Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996 12-09 City Council Packet5:00 p.m. Thursday, December 5 H R C Interviews AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, December 9, 1996 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 96 -25 _ M 1101 B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting 96 -23, (November 25, 1996) L .. a at 1 1 1. Human Relations Commission Appointment F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items. I f a member of the City Council wi she 3 "to discuss an item, that item w i l l be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Hazelwood Forest Final Plat (Bar Street, North of County Road C) 3. Planning Commission Code Change (Second Reading). 4. Increase in Community Development Service Charges (Second Reading) 5. Fire Department Ordinance (Second Reading) 6. Certification of Delinquent False Alarm Bills 7. Suburban Rate Authority, Amendments to Joint and Cooperative Agreement 8. Police and Fire Service contracts with City of Landfall 9. Fire Protection Services Contract with City of Oakdale 10. Liquor License - Michael E. Connor (New Manager - ChiChi's) 11. Cope Avenue Bituminous Overlay, Project 96 -11 - Final Payment 12. Sterling Street, Project 93 -08 - Final Payment 13. Park Dedication Fees G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M.: Proposed 1997 Budget and Property Taxes p _. a. Citizen Comments b. Council Discussion c. Resolution to Adopt the 1997 Budget d. Resolution to Adopt the Tax Levy for 19,7 f 1 2. 7:20 P.M.: Wetland Buffer Setback Variance, General Sprinkler Corporation (Co.Rd.D) 3. 7:45 P.M.: Maplewood Imports, 2780 Maplewood Drive Wetland Buffer Setback Variance Conditional Use Permit Design Approval 4. 8:00 P.M.: Tower and Antenna Ordinance (First Reading) H. AWARD OF BIDS I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Highwood 4th Addition Preliminary Plat (South of Highwood Ave., West of Lakewood Dr.) 2. Garbage and Refuse Code Change (Second Reading) 3. Ordinance to Set Sewer Rates for 1997 - 2nd Reading J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Pleasantview Park No. 3 Cash Connection Charge 2. Write Off Uncollectible Ambulance Bills for 1994 3. Revision of Procedures for Cancellation of Ambulance Bills K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Set Meeting with Legislators 2. 40th Anniversary Update 3. N. ADJOURNMENT f MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, November 25, 1996 Council Chambers, Municipal - Building Meeting No 96 023 A regular meeting of the City Council of MT to lewood, Minnesota was held in the Council. Chambers. Building, and was calle order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian. B PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. QLL CAUL Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Dale H Carlson, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Council /Manager Meeting November 4, 1996 rem- I K Ire 16 re — se - ite d-, Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 20. Minutes of Meeting 96 -22 (November 12, 1996) Councilmember Rossbach moved to awrove the minutes of Meeting No. 96 -22 (November 12 1996) as Dresented. go Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -all Mayor Bastian moved to aDDrove the Agenda as amended: L1 Mayor's Update Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 11 -25 -96 1. Proclamation: Lawrence Kaiser VFW Post 8901 a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. a doption : CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA A PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Lawrence Kaiser VFW Post 8901 has been an organization serving the greater Maplewood community since its founding by 17 members on December 16, 1956; and WHEREAS, the Lawrence Kaiser VFW Post has historic roots in Maplewood, as it is named in honor of a man killed in action in Belgium in Worl d War II, the son of Joseph and Elizabeth Kaiser, who lived in what was to become Maplewood; and WHEREAS, the Lawrence Kaiser VFW Post has a distinguished history of service to the Community, providing service and contributions for hospitalized veterans for veterans and their families in times of need, both financially and socially; for pre and distributing the American flag; for sponsoring such youth activities as baseball teams and Girl Scouts; and WHEREAS, the 110 members of the Lawrence Kaiser VFW Post will be celebrating its 50th anniversary on Saturday, November 30, 1996, beginning at 6:00 P.M. at the Maplewood Moose Lodge at 1946 English Street; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood wishes to recognize civic organizations for their contributions to the community, especially as they observe important milestones. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Gary Bastian, as Mayor and .on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim Saturday, November 30, 1996 as LAWRENCE KAISER VFW POST 8901 DAY IN MAPLEWOOD and encourage all residents to express their appreciation and join Commander Don Dybvig, Adjutant Harold Prust, and the members of the Post in their celebration. . Proclaimed this 25th day of November, 1996. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 2. Resolution of Appreciation: Lester Axdahl a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian introduced the followina Resolution and moved its do •n 11 -25 -96 96 - 11 13 1. JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Lester Axdahl has been a member of the Maplewood Planning Commission since August 8, 1974 and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has appreciated his experience, insights and good judgement and WHEREAS he has f reel y 9 i ven of his time and energy, without compensation.. for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consistently contributed his leadership, time and effort for the' benefit of the City. NOW., THEREFORE , IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf. of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota and its citizens, that Lester Axdahl is hereby extended our heartfelt g PP ratitude and a reciation for his dedicated service, and we wish him continued success in the future. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 30 Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce a. Manager McGuire introduced Kitty Rhoades of the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce. b. Ms. Rhoades gave a presentation about the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce and working with the City of Maplewood. Counci 1 member Carl son moved. seconded bv Mayor-Basti an: ayes a] I to awrove th Consent A Items F-1 thr -10 as recommended, 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: 7, I OWA , $ 175,294.02 $ 158 $ 154,984.31 $ 638 PAYROLL: E 279 9 871.03 325,011.22 $ 963,827.09 Checks #6820- #6836 Dated 11 -1 -96 thru 11 -5 -96 Checks #28880- #28921 Dated 11 -12 -96 Checks # 6837 - #6853 Dated 11 -5 -96 thru 11 -13 -96 Checks #28926- #29022 Dated 11 -19 -96 Total Accounts Payable Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits Dated 11 -15 -96 Payroll Deduction Checks Dated 11 -15 -96 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 11 -25 -96 2. Budget Transfer - Contingency to Legal Division Authorized a transfer of $25 , 000 from the Contingency Account (101- 119 -000- a 4910) to the Legal Division (101- 103 -000- 4480), the amount anticipated to be needed for the balance of the year. 3 Planning Commission Rules of Procedure Approve g d the following Rules of Procedure for the Maplewood Planning , Commission: . RULES OF PROCEDURE We, the members of the. Planning Commission of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, created p ursuant to Chapter 25 as amended, of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, do hereby accept the following Rules of Procedure subject to the P rovisions of said ordinances, which are hereby made a part of these rules A. MEETINGS 1. All meetings shall be held in City Hall unless otherwise directed by the chairperson, in which case at least 24 hours notice will be given to all members. 2. Regular meetings shall be held at 7 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month. If a regular meeting falls on a legal holiday, such meeting shall be rescheduled as a special meeting, if needed. 3. S ecial meetings shall be held upon call by the chairperson, or in his a sence y b the vice chair erson or by any other member with the P concurrence of five other members of the Commission. At least 48 hours notice shall be given to all members for special meetings. B. QUORUM 1. A simple majority of the current membership of the Commission shall constitute a quorum. 2. Any member having a conflict of interest shall declare the same before discussion of the item in which he or she has a conflict. Any member who abstains from voting on a question because of possible conflict of interest shall not be considered a member of the Commission for determining a quorum for the consideration of that issue. 3. Approval of any motion shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of the members present. C. DUTIES of CHAIRPERSON In addition to the duties prescribed in Section 25 -20 of the Code of Ordinances, the chairperson shall appoint such standing committees and tem ovary committees as are required, and such committees will be charged wit the duties, examinations, •investigations, and inquiries about the subjects assigned by the chairperson. No standing or temporary committee shall have the power to commit the Commission to the endorsement of any P lan or program without its submission to the f u l l Commission. V 11 -25 -96 D. ELECTION OF OFFICERS 1. A chairperson and vice chairperson shall be elected at the second meeting of each calendar year and will serve until their successors have been elected. 2. In the absence of the chairperson, the vice chairperson shall perform all duties required of the chairperson. When both the chairperson and the vice chairperson are absent, the attending members shall elect a chairperson pro tem. 3. If the chairperson resigns from or is otherwise no longer on the 0 planning . commission, the vice chairperson shall become the acting chairperson until the planning commission can hold an election for new officers. If the vice chairperson on or is otherwise no longer on the planning commission, the:pTanning commission will el. ect a new vi, ce chairperson at the next possible planning commission meeting. E. REPRESENTATION AT COUNCIL MEETINGS A representative from the Commission shall appear at each Council meeting, .where a planning item is on the agenda, to present the Commission's recommendation and to answer questions from the City Council regarding the decision. .The Commission shall adopt a rotating schedule of its members at the first meeting of each year to attend these meetings. F. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT In addition to carrying out the duties prescribed in Section 25 -25 of the Code of Ordinances, the director shall: 1. Prepare the agenda and minutes for each meeting of the Commission. 2. Act as technical advisor to the Commission. 3. Present written alternatives and make recommendations on matters referred to the Commission. 4. Maintain a record of all agenda items from application to final action by the City Council. G. AGENDA 1. Copies of the agenda, together with pertinent planning office reports and copies of the minutes of the previous meeting, shall be distributed so that the members of the Commission shall have a copy at least three days prior to the meeting concerned. 2. The agenda shall consist of the following order of business: a. Call to Order b. Roll Call c. Approval of Minutes d. Approyal of Agenda e. Public Hearings f. Unfinished Business g. New Business 11 -25 -96 5 h. Visitor Presentations i Commission Presentations j. Staff Presentations k. Adjournment 3. No item which is not on the agenda shall be considered by the Commission. H. Except as herein provided, Robert's Rules of Order, Revised and Robert's Parliamentary Law shall be accepted as the authority on parliamentary practice. I. Amendments to the comprehensive plan shall require that the Planning Commission follow the same procedure for hearings and notices as required by State law for zoning ordinances. J. APPOINTMENTS Appointments to the Planning Commission shall be made by the City Council, after a recommendation from the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall interview all candidates after a vacancy is advertised in the official newspaper and recommend three candidates to the City Council. Selection of the candidates shall be done by a written ballot. Each commissioner shall vote for not more than three candidates, listing them in order of preference, and sign his. or her ballot. The chairperson shall announce the vote of each member and tally the votes, giving three points to a first choice, two points to a second choice, and one point to a third choice. The names of the three candidates with the highest total votes shall be submitted to the Council, in order of total votes. The Commission shall make its recommendation based on qualifications and a representative geographical distribution of members. K AMENDMENT 1. Any of these rules may be temporarily suspended by the vote of two - thirds majority of the members present. 2. These Rules of Procedure may be amended at any regular meeting of the Commission by a majority vote of the entire membership and submitted to the City Council for approval. L. These "Rules of Procedure" shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission at the first meeting of each year. 4. Sale of Used Equipment Authorized the sale of sirens removed from squad cars and ambulances to the Forest Lake Fire Department to use on their fire /rescue equipment. 11 -25 -96 6 5. Charitable Gambling Permit Renewal - Hill Murray Mother's Club 96 - 11 - 132 APPROVING CHARITABLE GAMBLING BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the CityCouncil of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for Hill Murray Mothers Club to operate at The Live Rooster, 2D26 Woodlynn Avenue.,. Maplewood, Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Di vision of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permi t application as being in compliance with Minn. Statutes No. 349.213 FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood .City Council requests that the.Gambling control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minn. Statutes No. 349.213. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. 6. Application for Cancellation of Ambulance Bill - Dorothy Trinka Authorized cancellation of the remaining $104.76 balance of an ambulance - bill - for Dorothy Trinka - - on - the basis of financial hardship. - 7. Increase in Community Development Department Service Charges. Authorized the following Community Development . Department Service Charges for 1997, and approved first reading of an Ordinance to increase the plannin fees. Licenses Due January 1: Motels: 1 - 15 Unit's $ 93 16 - 35 Units 126 36 - 100 Units 232 Over 100 Units 266 Special Food Handling Establishment 76 Miscellaneous Service Charges: Woodlot Alteration Permit 13 Building Relocation 605 Moving Permit 45 Community Design Review Board: R1 & R2 161 Other 508 Demolition Permit 54 Mobile Home Permit 34 On -Site Sewage Systems 50 Publications: (Includes Sales Tax): Zoning Code 5 Platting Code 2 Sign Code 2 11 -25 -96 7 Comprehensive Plan 13 Zoning Map 2 City Map 2 Section Map 2 Planning Commission or Community Design Review Board: Minutes - Per Year 14 Agenda Packet - Per Year 97 Property Owner List 56 80 Increase in City Clerk Department Service Charges Authorized the following City Clerk Department Service Charges for 1997: Alarm Installation Permit $ 42 Alarm System License - Commercial. 42 Amusement Park License 289 Animal Kennels: New License 63 Renewal License 32 Animal License (Cat & Dog) 16 Auctioneer License 81 Bench Permit: , 1st Bench 52 Additional Benches 30 Block Party License 28 Carnival License 284 Catering Food Vehicle License: 1st Vehicle 1 97 Each Additional Vehicle 65 Fleet 258 Christmas Tree Sales License 172 Cigarette and Tobacco License 45 Coin Operated Amusement Device: Base Fee 170 Per Device 43 Contractor's License 97 Food Establishment License 502 Golf Course License 245 Itinerant Food Establishment License 57 Liquor License Investigation Fee 767 3.2 Beer: Off -Sale License 47 On -Sale License 177 Motor Vehicle Repair License 119 Non - Perishable Food Vehicle License: 1st Vehicle 57 Each Additional Vehicle 33 Fleet 132 Pawn Shop/2nd Hand Dealer License 274 Pending Assessment Search 35 Personal Services: Investigation Fee 540 License 166 11 -25 -96 8 Potentially Hazardous Food Vehicle License: 1st Vehicle 136 Each Additional Vehicle 65 Fleet .387 r, Service Station License: 12 1st Pump 137 Each Additional Pump 13 Sewer Connection Permit 70 Solicitor License: Base.Charge 129 Each Solicitor 45 Swimming Pool License (Commercial): Indoor 88 Outdoor 88 Combined 119 Tavern License 44 Taxicab License:. 1% Base Charge 46 Each Driver 20 Temporary Food and Beer License 40 Theater License: Indoor 174 Outdoor 424 Trailer Rental License: 1st Five Trailers 33 Each Additional Trailer 11 Truth -In- Housing Evaluators License 90 Truth -In- Housing Filing Fee 25 Used Car Dealer License 247 9. Increase in Miscellaneous Service Charges Authorized the following Miscellaneous Service Charges for 1997: . Dog /Cat Impound Fee $ 28 False Alarm Charge 25 -100* Liquor License- .Temporary On- Sale -Per Day 151 Occupancy Permit 12 Police Accident Report Copies 10 - Tax- Exempt Mortgage.Revenue Financing: Commercial: Amount Paid with Application (non- refundable) 2,750 Base Charge (% of bond issue)- 1% Maximum (in addition to lication fee) 28,600 *** Residential (Mul,,+ ip e- Family Dwellings) Amount Paid with Application (non- refundable) 2 Base Charge (% of bond issue) 1% Maximum (in addition to application fee) 28 Tax Increment Financing: Application Fee (non - refundable) 5,450 Temporary Gambling Permit - Per Day 50** * Set by ordinance adopted 8 -28 -95 ** Set by Ordinance adopted 9 -10 -90 ***Set by Council on 9 -23 -96 11 -25 -96 9 10. TH61 Watermain, Project 95 -17 - Change Order Approved Change Order 1 modifying the contract for Project 95 -17 to cover extra work required due to poor soil condition and water utility requests, and adopted the following Resolution: 96 -11 -133 DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - PROJECT 95 -17 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 95 -17, Trunk Highway 61 Water Main, Beam Avenue to County Road D and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 95 -17 Change Order One. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,- MINNESOTA that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order One in the amount of $4,078.10. The revised contract amount is $125,117.65 The Finance Director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. The project budget is increased by X5,000.00 to $182.080.00. 1. 7:00 P.M. (7:20 P.M.): Gervais Avenue, Kennard to Barclay, Project 96 -02 (4 Votes) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting -for a public hearing regarding the proposed reconstruction of Gervais Avenue from Barclay Street to Kennard Street. b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. c. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. d. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Jim Glander, 1572 Gervais Avenue Bill Forsythe, 1588 Gervais Avenue Fred Cox, 2410 Hazelwood Jim Glander, 1572 Gervais (second appearance) Chuck DeSolas, 2408 Barclay Paul Berkley, 1470 Gervais Letter from Mark Terry, 1478 Gervais (Delivered by Paul Berkley) Vaughn Bolger, 1548 Gervais Jim Otis, 2401 Hazelwood Kurt Tressman, 2427 Barclay Will Rossbach, 1386 County Road C 11 -25 -96 10 f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. • Councilmember Carlson m• -• • direct the City Ei o• -- ? r to e • ceed wi hi- r Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all h. Councilmember Carlson introduced the foll in Resolution and moved its do •n 96 - 11 134 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING . PROJECT 96 -02 WHEREAS, a Resolution of the City Council adopted the 28th day of October, 1996, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed construction of street and utility improvements on Gervais Avenue, from Barclay Street to Kennard Street, City Project 96 -02, AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on November 25, 19969 and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is necessary, cost- effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood construct street and utility improvements on Gervais Avenue, from Barclay Street to Kennard Street, City Project 96 -02, 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council Resolution adopted the 28th day of October, 1996. 3. The City Engineer is designated engineer for this. improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 4. The finance Director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of $633,640 shall be established. The proposed financing plans is as follows: Assessments $ 1909080 State aid 443.560 Total $ 633,640 Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 2. 7:15 P.M.: Planning Commission Code Change (1st Reading) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding Changes to the City Code relative to the Planning Commission, 11 -25 -96 11 b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Will Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one appeared. fo Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Koppen m oved to approve first readina of an Ordinance to change the size of the Planning Commission and to update the code language about the Planning Commission. Seconded by Allenspach Councilmember Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Allens ach, Carlson, Koppen Nays, - Counci member Rossbach NONE I UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Ice Arena Financing a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Mayor. Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. c. Councilmember Ko e moved" 0 appr priate fundina for t1l N0111111f the undesianatff-bal-ance n tho r-don lund, Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Koppen, Rossbach Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember Carlson 2. Bradley- Kingston Watermain, Project 96 -16 a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. d. Councilmember Rossbach moved to.not accept the Dublic water main Droject Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 11 -25 -96 12 3 Personal Services ordinance Revisions 2nd Reading a Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b Acting Chief of Police Ryan presented the specifics of the report. c. Councilmember Allenspach introduced the following Ordinance for second reading and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 765 PERSONAL SERVICE Chapter 24 PERSONAL SERVICE Art. I. In General, 0 24 -1 - 24 -9 Art. II. Escort Services Div. 1. Operation Div. 2. Licenses Art. III. Saunas and Bath Houses Div. 1. Operation Div. 2 Licenses Art. IV. Massage Services Div. 1. Operation Div. 2. Licenses Art. V. Business Premises ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 24 -1 Purpose of Chapter. The purpose of this Chapter is to regulate, within the limits of the City, providers of personal services, which include escort services, massage centers, saunas and bathhouses; and similar social , recreational, and therapeutic activities. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to the incidental provision of such services by athletic, lodging, recreational, religious, or social organizations upon their registered premises. For the purpose of this Chapter, "incidental provision" shall mean that the cost of providing such facilities, and any income generated from their use shall represent less than fifteen (15) percent of the gross revenues generated by such organization at such premises. Cross reference -- Rules of construction and definitions generally, § 1 -41 et seq.§ 24 -2. Sec. 24 -2. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them for the purposes of this Chapter: 11 -25 -96 1 Bathhouse: Premises providing members of the public or a private club with bathing and personal cleansing facilities for hygienic, therapeutic, restorative, or social purposes on a commercial basis. Escort: A person employed to provide companionship, attendance, or accompaniment to another for social or recreational purposes; such employment not directly related to the health or safety of the client. Escort Service: Premises at, or through which, escort is advertised, offered, or provided for, members of the public or a private club For the purpose of this Chapter, a rap parlor is classified as an on- premise escort service. Massage Center: Premises in, or upon which, massage is offered or performed for members of the public or of a private club. Massage Therapist: The recipient of a massage degree or certificate from a recognized school who holds a current practitioner's license for massage therapy issued pursuant to the Article III of this Chapter. Operate: To own, manage or conduct, or to significantly participate in the ownership, management or conduct of a business, enterprise or service regulated under this Chapter. Outcall Service: Provision, a massage therapist of massage services at a premises other than a licensed massage center. Person: Any natural person, corporation, firm, partnership, or association.. Practitioner: A natural person licensed by the City to engage in the business of escort service, sauna or bath house attendance, or massage therapy; either at a licensed premise of such.servi.ce or on an outcall basis. Rap parlor: A commercial enterprise hosting wide - ranging, on- premise verbal conversation between its employees and members of the public or a private club. Recognized school: With regard to a massage therapist (see above), a degree or certificate- producing massage program, approved by the State of Minnesota Higher Education Services Office, which includes not less than five hundred (500) hours of training in the theory, method, and techniques of massage. Sauna.: Premises providing members of the public or a private club with communal or individual dry or moist heating facilities for therapeutic, restorative, rehabilitative, religious or social purposes on a commercial basis. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.020 8 -3 -78) Sauna or Bathhouse Attendant: Practitioners, licensed pursuant to Article II of this Chapter, em loyed at a licensed Sauna or Bathhouse premises to assist customers in the use of the faci ities. Attendant duties involve direct customer contact and include, but are not l i mi tel to: valet and groomi ng se.rvi ce ; i ssue of 1 ocks l ockers, towel s , and cl othi ng containers; and operation of sauna and bath equipment. Secs. 24 -3. violations - Penalties. Failure to establish and maintain the premises and records required pursuant to this Chapter constitutes a violation of this ordinance. Such violations shall be cause for suspension, revocation or non - renewal of the premise or practitioner's license and, or, other penalties including a maximum fine of seven hundred ($700) dollars. Secs. 24 -4 thru 24 -9. Reserved. 11 -25 -96 14 ARTICLE II. ESCORT SERVICES DIVISION 1: OPERATION. Sec. 24 -10 Business Office and Records Each escort service licensed under this Article shall maintain a business office at a street address listed on the premise license application. The address must be an actual location from which business is conducted and not merely a post box or similar, accommodation address. The name and telephone number of the operator or manager, hours of..operation.of the service, and a copy of the premise license wi 11 be prominently displayed in the business office. Records of the escort service required by this Chapter, including a register of appointments, a roster of escorts and photographs of escorts, shall be available at the business office for inspection by City officials during the posted hours of operation. The owner or operator of each escort service will also provide the Maplewood Police Department with a name and telephone number to be used for contacting the licensee or manager outside the posted hours of operation. Sec. 24 -11. Same - Register of Appointments. Each escort service shall maintain a register of appointments for all licensed escorts provided by.the service. The register shall include the name and practitioner's license number of the escort; the name and address of the client; the method of payment; the address to which the escort was initially dispatched; and the date, start time and duration for which service was provided.. Appointments shall be registered in chronological order by date and start time of service, and indexed by practitioner's 1 i cense numbers. The register shall include all appointments for the previous twelve months. Sec.:24 -12. Same - Roster of Escorts. Each escort service shall maintain, at the premises of record, a roster of escorts available through the service. The roster shall include the name, practitioner's license number, address and telephone number.of each escort, the date that the escort service began employing or referring the escort, and the date, as applicable, that such employment or referrals ceased. The roster shall include the names of all escorts employed or referred by the service during the preceding twelve (12) months. Sec. 2.4 -13. Same - Photographs of Escorts. Each escort service shall maintain, at the premises of record, a color photograph of each escort employed or referred by the service. Photographs shall be full -face, not less than 23/, by 23/, inches, and renewed annually. The practitioner's license number of the escort and the date the photograph was made will be indicated, in indelible ink, on the reverse of the photo . Photographs w i l l be retained as long as the escort is listed on the roster described in Sec. 24 -12, above. Sec. 24 -14. Premise manager. A manager must be designated for each premises licensed under this Chapter and said manager must have a valid escort service practitioner's license. The premise licensee shall designate a natural person as manager, which manager shall be responsible for the conduct of business upon and from the premises until another natural person has been designated in writing as manager by the licensee. The premise licensee shall promptly notify the City 11 -25 -96 15 Manager in writing of any change of managers; said notice indicating the name and address of of the new manager and the effective date of, such change. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.070, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -15. Prohibited activities. Any touching, manipulation, stimulation or excitation of the sexual or genital anatomy of an escort or a client, by or in the presence of another, during the provision of escort services, is expressly rohibited In addition to penalties provided elsewhere in this Chapter, a maximum fine o seven hundred ($700) dollars may, be imposed for each violation of this section. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.120, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -16. Prohibited solicitation of business by licensed practitioner. No practitioner licensed under this Article shall solicit business in any public place or in any licensed liquor establishment in the City.. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.067, 8 -3 -78) Secs. 24 -16. Violations Penalties. Violation of requirements rements and rocedures specified in this Arti,c.l a shall be cause for q P suspension, revocation or non - renewal of the premise or practitioners license and, or, other penalties including a maximum fine of seven hundred ($700) dollars. Secs. 24 -17 thru 24 -19. Reserved, DIVISION 2: LICENSES Sec 24 =20. License Fees Generally. The fees charged by the City for preparing, recording and issuing licenses pursuant to this Article shall be established by resolution of the City Council. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.034, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -21. License Fee - Initial . The license fee shall be paid when the application for a license under this Article is submitted and shall not be refundable. (Ord.. No. 450 § 822.035 8 -3 078) Sec. 24 -22. Same - Investigative fee. Upon the filing of an application fora premise or practitioner's license under this Article, the applicant shall pay in full any applicable investigative fee established by resolution of the City Council. Investigative fees are non - refundable. ,Investigative fees are assessed to defray the cost of background investigation of the prospective licensee and, in the case of premise licenses, of the original designated manager thereof. No investigation is required and no investigative fee shall be charged for routine annual renewal of licenses. When a license has expired due to failure of the license-holder to apply for timely renewal, or where a license has been denied or revoked by action of the City Council; the City Manager, at the recommendation of the chief of police, may require the applicant to pay the investigative fee anew.(Ord. No. 450, § 822.050 8 -3 -78) 11 -25 -96 16 Sec. 24 -23. Premise license required. Except, for the incidental provision of services defined in Sec. 24-1 of this Chapter, each person, firm, partnership, association, or corporation operating an escort service 0 within the limits of the City must be in possession of a current premise license for such business issued by the City. Sec. 24 -240. Premise license application - manner of submission. An application for a premise license under this Article shall be made on forms supplied by the City for such purpose and shall contain all information required by this Chapter. Any falsification or willful omission of information required in the application shall be cause for denial, suspension or revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.040, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -25. Information required - premise license application. Each applicant for an escort service premise license shall provide the following information on the application form: (1) Whether the applicant is a natural person, a corporation, a partnership or other form of organization. (2) I f the applicant is a natural erson, his or her true name , i* pl ace and date of birth,, street residence address and p one number; whether the applicant s a citizen of the United States; whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a name other than his or her true name, and if so, what was such name or names, and information con ncerni n g dates and places where used; the name of the business,, if it is to be conducted under a designation, name or style other than the full individual. name of the applicant, and in such a case, a copy of the certification, as required by M.S., chapter 333, certified by the Clerk of the District Court shall be attached to the application; the street addresses at which applicant has lived during the preceding five (5) years; the kind, name, and location of every business or occupation the applicant has been engaged in during the preceding five (5) years; whether the ap licant has ever been convicted of any felony, crime, or violation of any ordinance of er than traffic ordinances, and, if so, the applicant shall furnish. information as to the time, place, and offense for which convictions were had; the physical . ption of the applicant; the types and amount of relevant training • descriining and p experience the applicant possesses with regard to the operation of an escort service; P and the same in ormation shall be required of the manager. (3) If the applicant is a partnership, the names and addresses of all partners and all information concerning each partner and the manager as is required of an individual applicant in paragraph (2) above; - the name of the. managing partners) and the 4. interest of each partner in the . bus iness; a true copy of the partnership agreement shall be submitted with the application, and if the partnership is required to f i l e a certificate as to a trade name under the provisions of M.S., Chapter 333, a copy of such certificate, certified by the Clerk of the District Court shall be attached. (4) If the applicant is a corporate or other organization, the name and, if incorporated, the state of incorporation; a true copy of the certificate of incorporation, Articles of incorporation or association agreement, and bylaws shall be attached to the application, and if a foreign corporation, a certificate of authority, as described I n M.S., Chapter 303, shall be attached; the name of the manager and all information concerning said person as is required by paragraph (2) above; a list of all parties who control or own an interest in excess of five (5) percent in such corporation or organization or who are officers of the corporation or organization and all information concerning said person(s) as is required by paragraph (2) above. 11 -25 -96 17 (5) Whether the applicant is licensed in other communities; and if so, where. (6) Whether the applicant has previously been denied a license to operate or provide escort services. - (7) Description and address of the premises for which the license is requested. (8) If the appl i cant is a natural person, one front face photograph of the applicant, taken within thirty (30) days of the date of application, at least two and one -half (23/ inches square and a complete set of the applicant's fingerprints which shall, be taken by the chief of police; if the applicant is a partnership, corporation, or other organization, one front face photograph of each partner and manager, taken within thirty (30) days of the date of.application, at least two and one -half (23/ ") inches square, and a complete set of applicants' and managers' fingerprints which q shall be taken by the chief of pol i ce. (9) Such other information as the City Council may require. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.041 8 -3 -78) Sec.. 24 -26. Application to be verified. .The application for a premise license under this Article shall be signed and sworn to by the applicant if the applicant is a natural person If the applicant is a corporation, the application shall be signed and sworn to by an officer of the corporation. If the applicant is a partnership, the application shall be signed and sworn to by one of the partners. The application shall be notarized by a commissioned notary public. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.043 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -27. Issuance or denial. No premise license shall be issued under this Article except pursuant to an approved Council resolution. The Council may grant or deny any license requested at its discretion. A Council resolution shall not be necessary for the routine renewal of an existing business license; rovided that, failure to apply for renewal at least thirty (30) days P. • before. the expiration of an existing license may be considered an abandonment of this routine renewal privilege and Council approval may be required prior to renewal is such cases. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.090, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -28. Conditions of premise license. No premise license shall be issued, renewed or continued in effect under this Article, unles .there is compliance with the minimum conditions and requirements as set forth in this Chapter. Failure to maintain compliance shall be cause for denial, suspension or revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.060, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -29. Licensing of premises when taxes, assessments, claims, etc., due, unpaid, etc . , to City, county, or state. No license shall be granted or renewed under this Article on any premises on which taxes, assessment or other financial claims of the City, county or state are due, delinquent or unpaid, In the event an action has been commenced pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 278, questioning the amount or validity of taxes, the Council may, on .appeal by the applicant, waive strict compliance with this provision. No waiver may be granted, however, for taxes or any portion thereof which remain unpaid for a period exceeding one year after becoming due. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.160 8 -3 -78) 11 -25 -96 16 Sec.. 24 -30. Suspension or revocation of premise license. A premise license issued under this Article may be revoked by the Council for cause pursuant to a hearing. Such hearing to be held after five (5) days notice to the licensee. A license may be suspended temporarily by the City Manager and suspension shall continue until otherwise ordered by the Council, providing that the charges of the City Manager be delivered in writing to the licensee and that the Council afford the licensee a hearing at its first scheduled meeting immediately following the suspension order. -Upon hearing, the Council may continue the suspension for a specific period or may terminate same or may continue the license in effect based upon any additional terms, conditions and stipulations which the Council may in its sole discretion impose. (Ord.. No. 450 § 822.170 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -31. Prohibited activities when license suspended or revoked. No premise licensee shal l solicit business or offer or agree to perform any licensed service nor shall licensed employees of the business licensee solicit business or offer or agree to perform any licensed service within the City, while the premise license is under suspension or revocation under this Article. (Oral. No. 450, § 822.180 8 -3 -78) Sec 24 -32. Expiration date. Premise licenses issued under this Division shall terminate on the last day of the calendar year in which such license was issued. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.033 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -33. Transfer of premise licenses. No premise license issued under this Article shall be transferred to any other person or premises (Ord. No. 450, § 822.036, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -34,, Practitioner's License Required for Individuals. It shall be unlawful for any natural person to engage in. business as an escort, as defined in this Chapter, unless: (1) Such person is in possession of a current escort practitioner's license; and, (2) Such person is listed in the .escort roster of at least one escort service currently licensed under Section 24 -19, above. "Engage in business ", means the provision of services described in this Chapter for which any charge or fee is made or any money or thing of value is solicited or received by the provider. Sec. 24 -35. Minimum Age Requirement. Every applicant for a practitioner's license under this Article must be a natural person and at least twenty -one (21) years of age. (Ord. No. 450 § 822.037, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24-36. Disqualifications for licenses. No practitioner's license shall be issued to any applicant who: (1) Is under twenty -one (21) years of age; (2) Is not a United States citizen or legal resident alien; 11 -25 -96 19 (3) 1 Has , within the past five (5) years been convicted of a felony offense, or any misdemeanor offense involving moral turpitude, or which relates directly to such person s a b i l i t y . , . ca aci ty or fitness to perform the duties and discharge the responsibilities of the 1 i cense activity; or C4) Within five (5) years prior to the date of application, has had a similar license revoked, denied or suspended (Ord. No. 450, § 822.0649 8 -3 -78) .Sec 24 -37. Filing of practitioner's license application. Every application for an escort practitioner's license under this Article shall be filed with the City Clerk on a form to be provided thereby. (Ord. No. 450, S 822.041 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -38. Practitioner's license application - manner of submission. An application for an escort practitioner's license under this Article shall be made on forms supplied by the city for such purpose and shall contain all information required by this Chapter. Any falsification or willful omission of information requirea in the application shall be cause for denial, suspension or revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 45.9 822.040 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -39. Information required - practitioner's license application. Each applicant for an escort practitioner's license shall provide the following information in their application: {1) The applicant's true name, place and date of birth, street residence address and phone number; whether the a pl i cant i a citizen of the United States whether the applicant has ever use or has been known by a name other than his or her true name, and if so, what was such name or names, and information concerning dates and places where used; the street addresses at which applicant has lived during the preceding five (5) years; whether the applicant has ever been convicted of any crime and, if so, the applicant shall furnish information as to the time, place, and offense for which convictions were had; the physical description of the applicant; and the previous training or experience of the applicant in providing escort services. (2) Whether the applicant is presently licensed in other communities; and if so, where. (3) Whether the applicant has previously been denied a license to provide escort services. (4) One front face photograph of the applicant, taken within thirty (30) days of the date of application, at least two and one -half (23/ inches square and a complete set of the applicant's fingerprints which shall be taken by the chief of police (5) Such other information as the City Council may require, (Ord. No . 450, § 822.041, 8 -3 -78. Sec. 24 -40. Application to be verified. The application for a practitioner's license under this Article shall be signed by the applicant, in the presence of a city employee, at the time of filing. Applicants shall furnish satisfactory proof of identification upon signing. 11 -25 -96 20 Sec. 24 -41. Conditions of practitioner's license. No practitioner's license shall be issued, renewed or continued in effect under this Article, unless there is compliance with the minimum conditions and requirements as set forth in this Chapter. Failure to maintain compliance shall be cause for denial,.suspension or IV revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.060 8 -3 -78) Sec..24. -42. Issuance or denial; appeal. Applications for practitioners' licenses under this Article shall be reviewed by the chief of police and such other City officials as the City Manager may deem necessary. At the earliest practicable time thereafter, the City Manager shall issue or deny the request for a license based upon the recommendation of such officials. Denial of an application by the City Manager may be appealed to the City Council, if such appeal is made in writing within ten (10 ) working days following the date of denial of the license. When appealed, the City Council may uphold or reverse the decision of the City Manager. (Ord. No. 450, §822.090(6), (C), $ -3 -78) Sec. 24.43. Suspension or revocation of practitioner's license. A practitioner's license issued under this Article may be suspended or revoked by the City. Manager for cause pursuant to an administrative hearing. Such hearing will be conducted by a city officer appointed for this .purpose by the City Manager and will be conducted five (5) days following the service of notice of revocation upon the license holder. The notice of revocation w i l l specify the violations and causes upon which the suspension or revocation is based and will afford the practitioner the opportunity to attend the administrative hearing. Service of the notice may be accomplished by certified mail to the practitioner's address of record or by leaving a copy of the notice with the manager of the escort service which maintains the practitioner upon it's escort roster Sec. 24 -44. Appeal of suspension or revocation. The practitioner may appeal a license suspension or revocation during a regularly meeting of the City Council. After reviewing the grounds for action and the results of the administrative hearing, the Council may uphold or reverse the decision of the hearing officer and it's judgement in this matter shall be final Sec. 24 -45. Prohibited activities when practitioner's license suspended or revoked. No practitioner licensed under this Article shall solicit business or offer or agree to perform any licensed service within the City when the license of said person has been suspended or revoked. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.190 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -46. Practitioner's license to be carried, etc. A copy of the ractitioner's license or an identification card, issued under this Chapter by the City, shal be carried by the licensee at all times while so employed and licensees shall present such documents for inspection when so requested by a proper official of the City. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.110 8 -3 -78) Sec 24 -47. Expiration date. Practitioners' licenses i -ssued under this Article shall terminate on the last day of the calendar year in which such license was issued. (ord. No. 450, § 822.033 8 -3 -78) Secs. 24 -48 thru 24 -49. Reserved, 1.1 -25 -96 21 ARTICLE II. SAUNAS AND BATH HOUSES DIVISION 1: OPERATION Sec. 24 -50. Business Office and Records Each sauna or bathhouse premise licensed pursuant to this Article shall maintain premises at the business address listed on the license application. The name. and telephone number of the operator or.Manager, hours of operation of the business premises and a copy of the premise license will be prominently.disp aged at these premises. Records of saunas or bathhouses required by this Article, including the roster of attendants and record of health inspections, shall be available at the premises for inspection by ,City officials during the posted hours of operation. Sec. 24 -51. Roster of Attendants. Each sauna or bathhouse shall maintain, on the premises, a roster of attendants employed therein. The roster shall include the name, practitioner's license number, address and telephone number of each attendant, together with the dates that employment began and terminated. The roster shall include the names of all attendants employed by the sauna or bathhouse during the preceding twelve (12) months. Sec..24 -52. Record of Health Inspections. Each sauna or bathhouse shall maintain, shell document periodic health inspections :authorized agents pursuant to this Article. on the premises, a record book in which it of the premises conducted by the City-or it's Upon conclusion of each inspection, the inspecting official w i l l enter into the record book the date of the inspection, the results and recommendations of the inspection, and the inspector's signature or other official identification. Sec. 24 -52. Premise manager. A manager must be assigned for each premises licensed under this Chapter and said manager must. have a val id bath house or sauna attendant practiti ones' s l icense. The premi se l i censee .shall. designate a natural person as manager and the manager shall be responsible for the conduct of the business upon the premises until another natural person has been designated in ,writing as manager by the.licensee. The premise licensee shall romptly notify the City Manager in writing of any change or managers; said notice in icating the name and address of the new manager and the effective date of such change. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.0709 .address Sec. 24 -53. Prohibited activities. .Any touching, manipulation, stimulation or excitation of the sexual or genital anatomy of a bathhouse or sauna attendant or patron, by or in the presence of another, upon the licensed premises, is expressly prohibited. In addition to penalties provided elsewhere in this Chapter, a maximum fine of seven hundred ($700) dollars may be imposed for each violation of this section. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.120 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -54. Prohibited solicitation of business by licensed practitioner. No bath house or sauna attendant licensed under this Article shall solicit business in any public place or in any licensed liquor establishment in the City. (Ord. No. 450, § 8220067 8 -3 -78) 11 -25 -96 22 DIVISION 2: LICENSES Sec 24 -55. License Fees - Generally. The fees charged by the City for preparing, recording and issuing licenses pursuant to this Article shall be established by resolution of the City Council. (Ord. No. 450, § 8220034 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -56. License Fee - Initial. The license fee shall be paid when the appli- cation for a license under this Article is submitted and shall not be refundable. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.035 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -57. Same.- Investigative fee.. Upon the filing of an application for a premise: or individual 1 i cense under this article, the applicant shall pay in full any applicable investigative fee established by resolution of the City Council. Investigative fees are non- refundable. Investigative fees are assessed to defray the cost of background investigation of the ganag rospective licensee and, in the case of premise licenses, of the original designated r thereof. No investigation is required and no investigative fee shall be charged for routine annual renewal of licenses. When a license has expired due to failure of the license-holder to' apply for timely renewal, or where a license has been denied or revoked by action of the City Council; the Ci ty Manager , at the recommendati on of the chi of of pol i ce, may requi re the appl i cant to pay the investigative fee anew.COrd. No. 450, § 82.200509 8 -3 -78, Sec, 24 -58. Premise license required. Except for the incidental provision of services defined in Sec. 24-1 of this Chapter , each person, firm, partnership, association, or corporation operating an escort service within the limits. of the . City must be in possession of a current premise license for such business issued by the City. Sec. 24 -59. Premise license application - manner of submission. An application for a premise license under this Article shall be made on forms supplied by the City for such purpose and shall contain all information required by this Chapter. Any falsification or willful omission of information required in the application shall be cause for denial, suspension or revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 450 § 822.040 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -60. Information required - premise license application. Each applicant for a sauna or bath house premise license shall provide the following information on the application form: (1) Whether the applicant is a natural person, a corporation, a partnership or other form of organization. (2) If the applicant is a natural person, his or her true name, place and date of birth, street residence address and phone number; whether the applicant is a citizen of the United States; whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a name other than his or her true name, and if so, what was such name or names, and information concerning dates and places where used; the name of the business, if it is to be conducted under a designation, name or style other than 11 -25 -96 23 the full individual name of the applicant, and in such a case, a copy of the certification, as required by M.. S . , Chapter 333, certified by the Clerk of the District Court shall be attached to the application; the street addresses at which applicant has lived during the preceding five (5) years; the kind, name, and location of every business or occupation the a plicant has been engaged in during the preceding five (5) years; whether t e applicant has ever been convicted of any felony, crime, or violation of any ordinance other than traffic ordinances, and, if so, the applicant shall furnish information as to the time, lace, and offense for which convictions were had; the physical description of ..the applicant; the type and amount of training or experience the ap licant possesses with regard to the operation of a sauna or bath house; and t e same information shall be required of the manager. (3) If the applicant is a partnership, the names and addresses of all partners and all information concerning each partner and the manager as is required of an individual applicant in paragraph (2) above; the name of the managi partner(s) and the interest of each partner in the business; a true copy of the P artnership agreement shall be submitted with the application, and if the partnership is required to file a certificate as to a trade name under the provisions of M.S. Chapter 333 a copy of such certificate, certified by the Clerk of the District Court shall be attached. (4) If the applicant is a corporate or . other organization, the name and, if i ncor orated, the state of i ncorporati on; a true copy of the certi f cate of incorporation, Articles of incorporation of association agreement, and bylaws shall be attached to the application, and if a foreign corporation, a certificate of authority, as describe in M.S. Chapter 303, shall be attached; the name of the Manager and all information concerning said person as is required by paragraph (2) above; a list of all parties who control or own an interest in excess of five (5) percent in such corporation or organization or who are officers of the corporation or organization and all information concerning said persons) as is required by paragraph (2) above. (5) Whether the applicant is licensed in other communities; and if so, where. (6) Whether the applicant has previously been denied a license to operate a bath house or sauna. (7) Description and address of the premises for which the license is requested. (8) If the ap leant is.a natural person, one front face photograph of the applicant, taken wit in thirty (30) days of the date of application, at least two and one - half (2� ") inches s uare and a complet set of the applicant's fingerprints which shall be taken y the chief of police; if the applicant is a partnership, corporation, or other organization, one front face photograph of each partner and managing agent, taken within thirty (30) days of the date of application, at least two and one - half (23/ inches square, and a complete set of applicant's fingerprints which shall be taken by the chief of police. (9) Such other information as the City Council may require. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.041, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -61. Application to be verified. The application for a premise license under this Article shall be signed and sworn to by the applicant if the applicant is a natural person. If the applicant is a corporation, the application shall be signed and sworn to by an officer of the corporation. If the applicant 11 -25 -96 24 is a partnership, the application shall be signed and sworn to by one of the partners. The application shall be notarized by a commissioned notary public. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.0439 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -62. Issuance or denial. No premise license shall be issued under this Article except pursuant to an approved Council resolution. The Council may grant or deny any license requested at its discretion. A Council resolution shall not be necessary for business l icense; provided that failure to apply for before the expiration of an existing license may b routine renewal privilege and Council approval may b cases. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.090, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24-63. Conditions of premise license, the routine renewal of an existing renewal at least thirty (30) days considered an abandonment of this required prior to renewal is such No premise license shall be issued, renewed or continued in effect under this Arti unless there i s compliance . with the minimum conditions and requirements as set forth in this Chapter. Failure to maintain compliance shall be cause for denial, suspension or revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.060 8 -3 -78) Seca 24 -64. Licensing of premises when taxes, assessments, claims, etc., due, unpaid, etc., to City, county, or state. No license shall be granted or renewed under this Article on any premises on which taxes, assessment or other financial claims of the City, county or state are due, delinquent or unpaid. In the event an action has been commenced. pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 278, questioning the or validity of taxes, the Council may,. on appeal by the applicant,, waive strict compliance with this provision. No wai ver may be granted, however, for taxes or any portion thereof which remain unpaid for a period exceeding one year after becoming due. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.160 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -65. Suspension or revocation of premise license. A premise license issued under this Article may be .revoked by the Council for cause pursuant to a hearing. Such hearing to be held after five (5) days notice to the licensee. A license may be suspended temporarily by the City Manager and suspension shall continue until otherwise ordered by the Council, providing that the charges of the City Manager be delivered in writing to the licensee and that the Council afford the licensee a hearing at its first scheduled meeting immediately following the suspension order. Upon hearing, the Council may continue the suspension for a specific period or may terminate same or may continue the license in effect based upon any additional terms, conditions and stipulations which the Council may in its sole discretion impose. (Ord. No. 450., § 8 -� -78) Sec. 24 -66. Prohibited activities when license suspended or revoked. No premise licensee shall solicit business or offer or agree to perform any licensed service. nor shall licensed employees of the business licensee solicit business or offer or agree to perform any licensed service within the City, while the premise license is under suspension or revocation under this Article. (Ord. No..450, § 822.180, 8 - - 78) 11 -25 -96 2F Sec 24 -67. Expiration date. R Premise licenses issued under this Article shall terminate on the last day of the calendar year in which such license was issued. (Ord.. No. 450, § 822.0339 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -68. Transfer of premise licenses... No premise license issued under this Article shall be transferred to any other person or premises. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.0369 8 -3-78) Sec. 24 -69. Practitioner's License Required for Individuals. It shall be unlawful for any natural person to engage in business as a sauna or bath house attendant, as defined in this Chapter, unless: C1) Such person is in possession of a current practitioner's license; and, (2) Such person is listed in the attendants roster of at least one sauna or bath house currently licensed under this Article. "Engage in business". means the provision of services described in this Chapter for which any charge or fee is made or any money or thing of value is solicited or received by the provider. Sec. 24 -70, Minimum Age Requirement. Every appl i cant for a practi ti oner.' s 1 i cense under thi s Arti cl a must be a natural person and at least twenty -one (21) years of age. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.037 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -71. Disqualifications for licenses. No practitioner's license shall be issued to any applicant who: (1) Is under twenty -one (21) years of age; (2) 1s not a United States citizen or legal resident alien; (3) Has, within the past five (5) years, been convicted of a felony offense, or any misdemeanor offense involving moral turpitude, or which relates directly to such person's ability, capacity or fitness to perform the duties and discharge the responsibilities of the licensed activity; or (4) Within five (5) years prior to the date of application, has had a similar license revoked, denied or suspended. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.064, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -72. Filing of practitioner's license application. Every application for a practitioner's license under this Article shall be filed with the City Clerk on a form to be provided thereby. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.041, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -73. Practitioner's license application - manner of submission, An application for a practitioner's license under this Article shall be made on forms supplied by the City for such purpose and shall contain all information required by this Chapter. Any falsification or willful omission of information required in the application shall be cause for denial, suspension or revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.040, 8 -3 -78) 11 -25 -96 .26 Sec. 24 -74. Information required practitioners license application. Each applicant for a sauna or bath house attendant practitioner's license shall provide .the following information in their application,-, (1) The applicant's true name, place and date of birth, street residence address and phone number; whether the applicant is a citizen.of the United States; whether the applicant has ever used or has been known, by a name other than his or her true name, and if so, what was such name or names, and information concerning dates and places where used; the street addresses at which applicant has lived during the preceding five (5) years; whether the a plicant has ever been convicted of any crime and if so, the applicant shall furni s information as to the time, place*, and offense for which convictions were had; the physical description of the applicant; and the types and amount of training or experience of the applicant possesses regarding the functions of a sauna or bath house attendant. (2) Whether the applicant is presently licensed in other communities and if so, where. (3) Whether the applicant has previously been denied a license to provide escort .services. (4) One front face photograph of the applicant, taken within thirty (30) of the date of applicati on . at least two and one -half (23/ inches square and a complete set of the applicant's fngerprints which shall be taken by the chief of police (5) Such other information as the City Council may require. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.041, 8 -3 -78. Sec. 24 -75. Application to be verified. The application for a practitioner's license under this Article shall be signed by the applicant, in the presence of a city employee, at the time of filing. Appl i cants shal 1 furnish satisfactory proof of identification upon signing. Sec. 24-76. Conditions of practitioner's license, No practitioner's license shall be issued, renewed or continued in effect under this Article, unless there is compliance with the minimum conditions and requirements as set forth in this Chapter. Failure to maintain compliance shall be cause for denial, suspension or revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.060, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -77. Issuance or denial; appeal. Applications for personal service licenses under this Article shall be reviewed by the chief of police and such other City officials as the City Manager may deem necessary. At the earliest practicable time thereafter, the City Manager shall issue or deny the request for a license based upon the recommendation of such officials. Denial of an application by the City Manager may be appealed to the City Council, if I appeal is made in writing within ten (10) working days following the date of denial of -the license. When appealed, the City Council may uphold or reverse the decision of the City Manager. (Ord. No. 450, §822.090(6), (C), 8 -3 -78) 11 -25 -96 27 Sec. 24 -78. Suspension or revocation of practitioner's license. A practitioner's license issued under this Article may be suspended or revoked by the City Manager for cause pursuant to an administrative hearing. Such hearing will be conducted. by a city officer appointed for this purpose by the City Manager and will be conducted five (5) days following the service of notice of revocation upon the license holder. The notice of revocation will s eci fy the violations and causes upon which the .suspensi on P or revokati on is based and will afford the practitioner the opportunity to attend the admi ni- strati ve hearing. Service of the notice may be accompli shed by certified mail to the ractitioner's address of record or by leaving a copy of the. notice with the manager of the escort service which maintains the practitioner upon it s escort roster Sec. 24 -79. Appeal of suspension or revocation. The practitioner may appeal a license suspsion of revocation during a. regularly meeting of the City Council. After reviewing the grounds for action and the results of the administrative hearing, the Council may.uphold or reverse the decision of the hearing officer and it's judgement in this matter shall be final. Sec. 24 -80.. Prohibited activities when. practitioner's license suspended or revoked. No practitioner licensed under this Article shall solicit business or offer, or agree to perform any licensed service within the City when the license of said person has been suspended or revoked. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.190, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -81. Practitoner's license to be carried, etc. A copy of the racti ti ones' s license or an identification card, issued under this Chapter by the City, shalf be carried by the licensee at all times while so employed and licensees shall present such documents for inspection when so requested by a proper official of the city. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.110, 8 -3.78) Sec.24 -82. Expiration date. Practitioner's licenses issued under this Division shall terminate on the East day of the calendar year in which such license was issued. (Ord. No. 450, S 822.033, 8 -3 -78) Secs. 24 -83 thru 24 -89. Reserved. Article III. MASSAGE CENTERS DIVISION 1: OPERATION Sec. 24 -90. Business Office and Records Each massage center licensed under this Article shall maintain a business office at a street address listed on the premise license application. The address must be an actual location rom which business is conducted, and not merely a post box or similar accommodation address. The name and telephone number of the operator or manager, hours of operation of the service, and a copy of the premise license will be prominently displayed at the business office. Records of the massage center required by this Article, including the roster of massage therapists, photographs of outcall therapists and register of outcall appointments, shall be available at the premises for inspection by City officials during the posted hours of operation. 11 -25 -96 28 Sec. 24 -91. Roster of Massage Therapists. Each' massage center shall maintain, on the premises, a roster of massage therapists available through the center. The roster shall include the name, practitioner's license number, address, and telephone number of the therapist, the date that the massage center began representing the therapist, and the date, as applicable, that such representation ceased. The roster shall include the names of all massage therapists represented by the massage center during the preceding twelve (12) months, Sec. 24 -92. Register of Outcall Appointments. Each massage center shall maintain, at the premises of record, a register of all appointments for outcal1 service provided through the center. The register shall include the name and ractitioner's license number of the massage therapist, the name and address of the client, t e method of payment, and the address, date and time at which massage was provided. Appointments shall be registered i n chronological order by date and time of appointment. The register shall include all appointments for the previous twelve months. Sec..24 -93. Photographs of outcall Massage Therapists. Each.massage center shall maintain, at the premises of record, a color photograph of each massage therapist available for outcall service through the center. Photographs shall be full-face, not less than 23/ by 23/ inches, and shall be renewed annually. The ractiti.oner's license number of the therapist and the date the photograph was made will be indicated in indelible ink on the reverse of the photo. Photographs will be retained, while the therapist is listed on the roster described in Sec. 24 -18, above. Sec. 24 -94. Premise manager. A manager must be assigned for each premises licensed under this Chapter and said manager must have a valid massage therapist practitioner's license. The premise licensee shall designate a natural person as manager and the manager shall be responsible for the conduct of the busi ness until another natural . person has been designated in writing as manager by the licensee. The premise licensee shall promptly notify the City Manager in writing of any change or managers; said notice indicating the name and address of the new manager and the effective date of such change. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.0709 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -66. Clothing requirements. The buttocks and genitals of all massage therapists and the breasts of female massage therapists shall be o aquely clothed at all times during the provision of licensed services. (Ord. No. 4 0 § 822.069 9 - 8-3-78) Sec. 24 -95. Prohibited activities. Any touching, manipulation, stimulation or excitation of the sexual or genital anatomy of a client by a massage therapist, or of a massage therapist by a client, pursuant to the provision of massage is expressly prohibited. In addition to penalties provided elsewhere in'this Chapter, a maximum fine of seven hundred ($700) dollars may be imposed for each violation of this section. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.120, 8 -3- 78) Sec. 24 -96. Prohibited solicitation of business by licensed practitioner. No practitioner licensed under this Article shall solicit business in any public place or in any licensed liquor establishment in the City. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.067 8 -3 -78) 11 -25 -96 29 Secs. 24 -97. Violations - Penalties. Violation of requirements and procedures specified in this Article shall be cause for suspension, revocation or non - renewal of the premise or practitioner's license and, or, other penalties including a maximum fine of seven hundred ($700) dollars. Secs 24 -98 thru 24 -99. Reserved. DIVISION 2. LICENSES Sec 24 -100. License Fees - Generally. The fees charged by the City-for preparing., recording and issuing. license's pursuant to this Article shall be established by resolution of the City Council. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.034 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -101. License Fee Initial . The license fee shall be paid when the application for a license under this Article is submitted and shall not be refundable. (Ord. No. 450, § 822..035 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -102. Same - Investigative fee. Upon the filing of an application for a premise or individual license under this article, the applicant shall pay in full any applicable investigative fee established by resolution of the City Council. Investigative fees are non-refundable. Investigative fees are assessed to defray the cost of background investigation of the prospective licensee and, in the. case of remise licenses, of the original designated manager thereof. No investigation is require and no investigative fee shall be charged for routine annual renewal of licenses. When a license has expired due to failure of the license-holder to apply for ti mel y renewal, or where a license has been denied or revoked by action of,the City Council; the City Manager, at the recommendation of the chief of police, may require the applicant to pay the investigative fee anew.(Ord. No. 450 § 822.0509 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -103. Premise license required. Except for the incidental provision of services defined in Sec. 24 -1 of this Chapter, each person, firm, partnership, association, or corporation operating a massage service within the limits of the City must be in possession of a current premise license for such business issued by the City. Sec. 24 0104. Premise.license application - manner of submission. An application for a premise license under this Article shall be made on forms supplied by the City for such pur ose and shall contain all information required by this Cha ter. Any falsification or wil ful omission of information required in the application sha 1 be cause for denial, suspension or revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.040 8- 3 -78)- Sec. 24 -105. Information required - premise license application. Each applicant for an massage service premise license shall provide the following information on the application form: (1) Whether the applicant is a natural person, a corporation, a partnership or other form of organization. 11 -25 -96 30 (2) If the applicant is a natural person, his or her true name, place and date of birth, street residence address and p one number; whether the applicant is a citizen of the United States; whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a name other than his or her true name,.and if so, what was such name or names, and information concerning dates and places where used; the name of the business, if it is to be conducted under a designation, name or style other than the full individual name of the applicant, and in such a case, a copy of the certification, as required by M. S. Cha ter 33,3, certified by the Clerk of the District Court shall be attached to the app ication; the street addresses at which applicant has lived during the preceding f i.ve (5) years;* the kind,' name, and location of every business or occupation the applicant has been engaged in during the preceding five (5) years whether the ap l i cant has ever been convicted of any felony, crime, or violation of any ordinance .ot er than traffic ordinances, and, if so, the applicant shall furnish information as to the time, place, and offense for which convictions were had; the physical description of the applicant; the t vn es and amount of training possessed by the a pl icant relevant to the operation o a massage center; and the same information s all be required of the manager. (3) If the applicant is a partnership, the names and addresses of all partners and all information concerning each partner and the manager as is required of an individual applicant in paragraph (2) above; the name of the managing partner(s) and the interest of each partner in the business; a true copy of the partnership agreement shall be submitted with.the application,. and if the partnership is required to file a certificate as to a trade name under the provisions of M.S., Chapter 333 a copy of such certificate, certified by the Clerk of the District Court shall be attached. (4) If the applicant is a corporate or other organization, the name and, if incorporated, the state of incorporation a true copy of the certificate of incorporation, Articles of incorporation of association agreement, and bylaws shall be attached to the application, and if a foreign corporation, a certificate of authority, as described in M.S. Chapter 303, shall be attached; the name of the manager and all information concerning said person as is required by paragraph (2) above;. a l i s t of all parties who control or own an interest in excess of five (5) percent in such corporation or organization or who are officers of the corporation or organization and all information concerning said person(s) as is required by paragraph (2) above. (5) Whether the applicant is licensed in other communities; and if so, where. (6) Whether the applicant has previously been denied a license to conduct the type of business for which a license is requested. (7) Description and address of the premises for which the license is requested. (8) If the applicant is a natural person, one front face photograph of the applicant, taken within thirty (30) days of the date of application, at least two and one-half (23/ inches square and a complete set of the applicant's fingerprints which shall be taken by the chief of police; if the applicant is a partnership, corporation, or other organization, one front face photograph of each partner and managing agent, taken within thirty (30) days of the date of application, at least two and one -half (23/ inches square. (9) Such other information as the City Council may require. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.041 8 -3 -78) 11 -25 -96 31 Sec. 24 -106 Application to be verified The a lication for a remise. license under this Article shall be signed and sworn to by • pp .P the the applicant if the applicant is a natural person. If the applicant is a corporation, • PP cor at on . I f- the applicant a application shall be signed and sworn to by an officer of the por is n to b one of the is a.partnership, the application shall be signed and sworn y partners. The p application shall be notarized by a commissioned notary public. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.043, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -107. Issuance or denial. issued under this Article except pursuant to an approved t No premise license shall be P P Council resolution. The Council may grant or. deny any license requested at its discretion. n shall not be necessary for the routine renewal o A Council resolutio Y f an existing business license; provided that, failure to apply for renewal at least thirty (30) days expiration of an existing license may be considered an abandonment before the ex • P • of this P routine renewal privilege and Council approval may be required prior to rene wal is such cases. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.090, 8 -3 -78) sec. 24 -108. Conditions of premise. license. No premise license , shall be issued renewed or continued in effect under this Article, unless there is compliance with the minimum conditions and requirements as set forth in this Chapter. Failure to maintain compliance shall be cause for denial, suspension o • p r revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.0609 8 -3 -78) Sec,. 24 109. Licensing p - 'n of remises when taxes, assessments, claims, etc., due, unpaid, etc., to City, county, or state. shall be ranted or renewed under this Article on any premises on which No' license sha ich taxes, granted assessment or other financial claims of the City, county or state are due, delinquent or un P aid., In the event an action has been commenced pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 278, questioning the amount or validity of taxes, the Council PP ma on a eal by the applicant, waive strict compliance with this provision. No waiver may Y a ranted, however, for taxes or any portion thereof which remain unpaid for a period 9 exceeding.one year after becoming due. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.16 0 8-3-78) Sec. 24 -110. Suspension or revocation of premise license. A P remise license issued under this Article may be revoked by the Council for cause P ursuant to a hearing. Such hearing to be held after five (5) days notice to the licensee. A license may be suspended temporarily by the City Manager and suspension shall continue Y P di until r be until otherwise ordered by the Council, providing that the charges of the City Manage delivered i n writing to the licensee and that the Council afford d 9 ford the licensee a hearing at its first scheduled meeting immediately following the suspension order. Upon hearing, Y the Council may continue the suspension for a specific period or may terminate same or may continue the license in effect based upon any additional terms, conditions and stipulations which the Council may in its sole discretion impose. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.1709 8 -3 -78) 11 -25 -96 32 a Sec. 24 -111. Prohibited activities when license suspended or revoked. No premise licensee shall solicit business or offer or agree to perform any licensed service, nor shall licensed employees of the business licensee solicit business or offer or agree to perform any licensed service within the City, while the business license is under suspension or revocation under this Article.. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.180 8 -3 -78) Sec 24 -112. Expiration date. Premise licenses issued under this Division shall terminate on the last day of the calendar year in which such license was issued, .(Ord. No. 450 § 822.033 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -113. Transfer of premise licenses. No premise license issued under this Article shall be transferred to any other person or premises. No. 450, § 822.036. 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24-114, Practitioner's License Required for Individuals.. It shah 1 be, unl awful for any natural person to engage i n busi ness as a massage therapi st as defined in thi s Chapter, unl ess: (1) Such person is in possession of a current practitioner's license; and, (2) Such person is listed in the thera ists' roster of at least one massage service currently licensed under Section f4-19,, above. "Engage in business'.', means . the provision of services described in this Chapter for. which any charge or fee is made or any money or thing of value is solicited or received by the provider. Sec. 24 -115. Minimum Age Requirement. Every applicant for a practitioner's license under this Article must be a natural person and at least twenty -one (21) years of age. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.037, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -116. Disqualifications for licenses, No practitioner's license shall be issued to any applicant who: (1) Is under twenty -one (21) years of age; (2) Is not a United States citizen or legal resident alien; .(3) Has, within the past five (5) years., been convicted of a felony offense, or any misdemeanor offense involving moral turpitude, or which relates directly to such person's ability, capacity or fitness to perform the duties and discharge the responsibilities of the licensed activity; or (4.) Within five (5) years prior to the date of application, has had a similar license revoked, denied or suspended. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.064 -3 -78) Sec. 24-117. Filing of practitioner's license appl i cation . Every ap 1 i cati on for a practitioner's license under this Article shall be 'filed with the City Cler on a form to be provided thereby. (Ord. No. 450, S 822.041 8 -3 -78) 11 -25 -96 33 Sec. 24 -118. Practitioner's license application — manner of submission. An appl ication for a practitioner's license under this Article shall be made on forms supplied by the City for such pur ose and shall contain all information required by this Chapter. Any falsification or wi 1 ful omission of information required in the application sh -a ll be cause for denial, suspension or revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.040 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -119. Information required - practitioner's license application. Each applicant for an P massage therapist's ractitioner's license shall provide the P following information in their application: (1) The applicant's true name, place and date of birth, street residence address and phone number; whether the applicant is a citizen of the United States; whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a name other than his or her true name, and if so, what was such name or names, and information concerning dates and places where used; the street addresses at which applicant has lived during the preceding five (5) years; whether the a 1 i cant has ever been convicted of any crime and , i f so, the applicant shall furni s i P. nformati on as to the time, pl ace, and offense for which convictions were had; the physical description of the applicant; and the previous training or experience of the applicant in providing massage services.. (2) Whether the applicant is presently licensed in other communities; and if so, where. (3) Whether the applicant has previously been denied a license to provide massage services. (4) One front face photograph of the applicant, taken within thirty (30) days of the date of application, at least two and one -half (2i ") inches square. (5) Such other information as the City Council may require. (Ord. No. 450., § 822.041,. 8 -3 -78. Sec. 24 -120 Educational requirements of applicants. Every applicant for a massage therapist practitioner's license under this Article shall furnish a certified copy of their diploma or certificate of graduation from a recognized school. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.080 8.3 -78) Sec. 24 -121. Application to be verified. . The application for a practitioner's license under this Article shall be signed by the applicant, in the presence of a city employee, at the time of filing. Applicants shall furnish satisfactory proof of identification upon signing. Sec.. 24 -122. Conditions of practitioner's license. No practitioner's license shall be issued, renewed or continued.in effect under this Article, unless there is compliance with the minimum conditions and requirements as set forth in this Chapter. Failure to maintain compliance shall be cause for denial, suspension or revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.060 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -123. Issuance or denial; appeal. Applications for personal service licenses under this Article shall be reviewed by the chief of police and such other City officials as the City Manager may deem necessary. At the 11 -25 -96 34 earliest practicable time thereafter,, the City Manager shall issue or deny the request for a license based upon the recommendation of such officials. Denial of an application by the City Manager may be appealed to the City Council, if such appeal is made in'writing within ten (10 ) working days following the date of denial of the license. When appealed, the City Council may uphold or reverse the decision of the City Manager. (Ord. No. 450 §822.090(B ), (C ), 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -124. Suspension or revocation of practitioner's license. A�practitioner's license issued under this Article may be suspended or revoked by the City Manager for cause pursuant to an administrative hearing. Such hearing will be conducted by a city officer appointed for this purpose by the City Manager and will be conducted five (5) days following the service of notice of revocation upon the license hoT der The notice of revocation will specify the violations and causes upon which the suspension or 'revocation is based and will afford the practitioner the opportunity to attend the administrative hearing. Service of the notice may be accomplished by certified mail to the practitioner's address of record or by leaving a copy of the notice with the manager of the massage service which maintains the practitioner upon it's roster of therapists. Sec. 24 -125. Appeal of suspension or revocation. The practitioner may appeal a license suspension or revocation during a regularly meeting of the City Council. After reviewing the grounds for action and the results of the administrative hearing, the Council may uphold or reverse the decision of the hearing officer and it s judgement in this matter shall be final, 3 Sec. 24 -126. Prohibited activities when practitioner's license suspended or revoked. No practitioner licensed under this Article shall solicit business or offer or agree to perform any 11 censed servi ce wi thi n the Ci ty when the 1 i cense of said person has been suspended or revoked (Ord. No 450, § 822.190, 8 -3 -78) Sec 24 -127. Practi li cense to be carri etc. A copy of the ra ctiti oner' s license or an identification card, issued under this Chapter by the City, shalf be carried by the licensee at all times while so employed and licensees shall. present such documents for inspection when so requested by a proper official of the City. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.110 8 -3 -78) Sec 24 -128. Expiration date. Practitioner's licenses issued under this Article shall terminate on the last day of the calendar year in which such license was issued. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.033 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -129. Reserved, Article IV. LICENSED PREMISES Sec, 24 -130. Construction requirements. All premises licensed under this Chapter shall meet the following construction requirements: (1) Mechanical ventilation, lighting, and sanitary fixtures for closets, restrooms, offices, treatment areas and public areas shall conform the codes established by 11 -25 -96 35 the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and.. Air Conditioning Engineers and by the Uniform Building Codes. (2) Individual lockers shall be provided or the use of patrons with separate keys for locking. (3) The doors to saunas and individual massage rooms shall not be equipped with any locking device and shall not be blocked or obstructed from either side. (Ord. No. 450 § 822.0619 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -131.. Maintenance requirements. All premises licensed under this Chapter shall meet the following maintenance requirements: (1) Handwashing sinks, urinals, floors, walls and equipment shall be kept in a state of good repair and maintained in a clean, sanitary condition at all times. (2) Sanitary hand cleaning agents, sanitary towels and toilet tissue shall be .provided at all times. (3) Adequate refuse receptacles shall be provided and shall be emptied as required. (4) Linens and other materials shall be stored at least twelve (12) inches off the floor. (5) Clean towels and washcloths shall be made available for each customer in massage centers sauna, and bathhouses. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.062, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -132. Zoning requirements. In the development and execution of this Chapter, it is recognized that there are some uses which, because of their very nature, are recognized as having serious objectionable operational characteristics,. particularly when several of these uses are concentrated under certain circumstances, thereby having a deleterious effect upon the adjacent areas. Special regulation of these uses is necessary to insure that these adverse effects will not contribute to the blighting or downgrading of the surrounding neighborhood. Therefore, all premises licensed under this Chapter shall meet the following zoning requirements in addition to any others that may otherwise be provided for by this Code and other ordinances of this City: (1) A business license shall be issued under this Chapter only for property zoned business- commercial; P provided that, such use is not detrimental to existing and future development. No escort service, massa a center, sauna, or bathhouse shall be operated within (2) g . twenty -six hundred (2,600) feet of any other escort service, massage center, sauna or bathhouse. (3) No escort service, massage center, sauna, or bathhouse shall be operated within twenty-six hundred (2,600) feet of any residentially zoned district, a church, a nursery, an elementary, junior high or high school or any establishment frequented by juveniles. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.063, 8 -3 -78) 11 -25 -96 36 Sec. 24 -133 Closing hours. No premises licensed under this Chapter shall be open between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7.:00 a.m. of the following day, and no business shall be operated on Sunday. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.063, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24.134. Inspections of premises. A11 appl i cants and 1-i censees under, thi s Chapter shal l al l ow a proper off 1 ci al of the Ci ty to inspect and periodically examine the premises for the purpose of ascertaining that said premises conform to all requirements and regulations pertaining to health, fire and sanitation and to ensure the preservation of the good order and peace of the City. Any refusal on the part of the applicant or licensee to allow such inspection or exami nation shall be deemed as sufficient grounds upon which the City Manager may deny, suspend or revoke a license. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.100, 8 -3 -78) Sec. 24 -135. Minimum age requirement for presence on premises, exception. No person under the age of eighteen (18) years . shall be permitted at any time on the premises licensed under this Chapter as a customer or guest, unless accompanied by a parent or guardian. (Ord. No. 450, § 822.130, 8.3 -78) Sec. 24-136. Alcoholic beverages on premises. No.alcoholic beverages shall be allowed on any premises licensed under this Chapter at any time, (ard. No. 450 § 822.140, 8 -3 -78) Cross reference -- Alcoholic beverages generally, Ch. 5. Secs. 24 -137. Violations o Penalties. Violation of requirements and procedures specified in this Article shall be cause for suspension, revocation or non - renewal of the business premise or personal service license and, or, other penalties including a maximum fine of seven hundred (5700) dollars. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Councilmembers Allens ach, Carlson,, Koppen, Ross Each Nays - Mayor Bastian 4. Driveway Variance, 2345 Maryland Ave. E a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following persons were heard: John Wykoff, 2345 Maryland Avenue E Al Johnson, 2335 Maryland Avenue E 11 -25 -96 37 Seconded by Councilmember Koppen 1, Amusement City Review (1870 Rice Street) Ayes Counci 1 members 'Al 1enspach Koppen., Rossbach Nays Mayor Bastian, Councilmember. Carl-son a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the report. C. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following persons were heard: Carolyn Wilkerson, 1879 Jackson Jerry Anderson, Amusement City driving range manager • • •° o•° moved • - 1°. forma 1• • t he •Is •1a E se Permi t to determi 1' whether 1" s saf issues which should result in amending or •. 1! the •° 11 Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 2. Garbage and Refuse Code Change (First Reading) a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Assistant City Manager Dawson presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished.to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. d. Councilmember Koppen moved to V rove first reading of an ordinance about garbage and refuse in ChaDter 16 of the Cit Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 11 -25 -96 3E 3. Phalen Chain of Lakes Watershed P roject a. Manager McGui introduced the. staff report b. Assistant City Manager - Dawson presented the specifics of the report. C. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to s eak before the Council regarding this.matter. The foll owing persons were. eard: Sherri Buss, Phalen Chain of Lakes Watershed Pro ject Wi ll Rossbach, Planning Commi NO MOTION WAS MADE o; '► ► i �► 1 L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Mayor's Update a. Mayor Bastian informed the Council of various upcoming events and meetings, Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk 11 -25 -96 39 AGENDA NO. G * � / AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Sherrie Le, Human Resource Director Action by Council. Endorsed R .e j . Date RE: HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION APPOINTMENT DATE: November 18, 1996 INTRODUCTION There will be a vacancy on the Human Relations Commission due to the resignation of Marie Koehler whose term expires on 12/31/96. City staff advertised this vacancy in the Maplewood Review, St. Paul Pioneer Press, Maplewood In Motion, and through posted flyers. We received applications from four Maplewood residents. BACKGROUND At their meeting on November 6, the Human Relations Commission interviewed three applicants for the vacancy. The Commission voted to recommend the top two applicants to the City Council. DISCUSSION Attached are the applications of the two people - -Katie Thein Kimlinger and Cheryl Johnson - -that the HRC is recommending to fill this vacancy. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council interview the applicants and appoint one applicant to fill the vacancy. This person shall serve on the Human Relations Commission from January 1, 1997 through December 1999. tmc Attachments v � - v ter• CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION FOR NAME. 4 .el Cr ADDRESS U. �1 PHONE NO. Work: Home: DATE II 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? 3 � ''1 Cur c 2) Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes No Comments: 3) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (please check) Community Design Review Board Park & Recreation Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority Planning Commission Human Relations Commission Police Civil Service Commission 4) Do you have any spec ific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsibilities? o 1A lo too, &Ih-A 5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: - �ave� Serves �.s � volu.��-� -ee.r -�-�� P�.�.s-Y C"�k_��.' ��u. �r d � �,ti, `�-� L'� - I- �'r►. Pty l��r�� w�� re 'T a.c:f� � �_5 ��, a_d V4 c�--f- �. -(�r n (�� �t� r eve i b. YtieQc� � � pry }-e-G_'�'1V�t yGa. L ►'� 4 9j q k�- -�o r �avne v� . �ac,� o� � ��se �o s i � i tln. �' ll�:'r ir � one 1v ra�e. e.onfronf iss�?ps e� e a�vJ e��et (0/"._ See, . soCu.�fi�or�s -!v san e o �� -��.. 6) Why would you like to serve on is Board or Commission � WoOd i �b bleeme M. orb Q.c. h ;'t -A e j- ��.rn.�.r► l�cl� fi,r►� �����,�ss��n would e614bIe yn.t yv d` Ufov iD av�,;� rydto /v y,. 41tk � / �au��e i�ec�.�� -�G� 11 G� 'P�{.�'. c�a�ee`_ -� � �'.� 1)eme �� ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ��I`eh So .� tta�,�s h.�;c.V _ �l�.e �� / re criv-vl�e(:( 4. _ _a._ vo(u..h r' . ... ___ � oo A -� rv� j )/.,tS/ ' S /14 A� t I n kltk s 1 ,c, C o r � U, a ._ . Wr 1, - _ e ve'r� 0 M C 4 9 THE INFORMATION CIONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC. r d o� �u car Gib rORPARMPRIWOMM API +I C� r1ov -4 1 a/,ja*, 'S e r V i e tv '• �' m f� NAME 04:� .. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM T' ADDRESS ZIP /� PHONE NO. Work: ?Dci- Home• '2?� �-S DATE 1 1 3o 9 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? a 2) Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes No Comments: am X: can -j4ebs-dU I bn 3) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? ( check) g r Community Design Review Board Park & Recreation Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority Planning Commission Human Relations Commission Police Civil Service Commission , 4) Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsibilities? ��� • � /'�'IQ,y �1GLIfv /hOr`G &K //7cSG17-6 4,1'G4S, o4u f 4 4 5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: IV40n 6. 6) Why would you like to serve on this Board or Commission? I J 7 1 7alw, beeli lc»/'Kln `7� �N"e- Q. ll� O(' + / 0--Pm eSS - `b °�f� - kA Yar , e o }� � i rd►v� d k�l5 i ,�,;, -W, c9, s��.t� -i.�e s for �jUr , � coo Xtd I , Ke, -►o Wr �1h:�s e�c pe.►--, L-) -o y-er � +� q. Uhor-e broad - �'i'e.Jd . The -Mt., #&.'ra¢�i /9e/a,�i � cane.. s ��►� �ac�c�ee. �c�4. �, �` �. -k--. a'► has RdapJ -cd ,s ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC. FORM&BRDBCOMM,AK 10/86 AGENDA NO. F -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: December 3, 1996 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABL $160 Checks #6854 thru #6873 dated 11-13-96 thru 11 -20 -96 $230, 681.74 Checks #29027 dim #29111 dated 11 -26 -96 $3,864.00 Checks #6874 thru #6878 dated 11 -22 -96 thru 11 -27 -96 ,$325,116.01 Checks #29116 thru #29192 dated 12 -3 -96 $720,101.76 Total Accounts Payable PAVRO $273,745.39 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 11 -27 -96 Payroll Deduction check dated 11 -27 -96 $290,407.14 Total Payroll $1,010,508.90 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. rb Attachments CA PWINMAGENDAIAPPRCL03.DEC CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE. 1 VOUCHRE2 12/02/96 14:54 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER Ej3 I&i i E!P PERA F'!R DEDUCTED NOV ' f OR DEC PREM VOUCHER/ 321 « 00 29116 2 91 . 17 . 12/03/96 1 3 � NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT s 6 ':875:1/2b�'9, T20fi00 POSTMASTER &IfLK RATE PERMIT 1997 04903 . 85.00 85..00 ,� ,z . 6876 11/26/96 900180 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 3,000.00 3,000.00 ;; i8"!8 1/27/9 T004 50 PERA F'!R DEDUCTED NOV ' f OR DEC PREM 321.00 321 « 00 29116 2 91 . 17 . 12/03/96 1 HANSON. JANELLE 1 AR& vrr, rn REFUND — HOLIDAY VINE WREATHS REEl IND. MINE WREATH 6.00 A-A 6.00 X9118 12/03;�+�96 COF''P'�, BHIttLEY REFUND -- MINE WREATH 6 .00 6 .00 29119 12/03/96 ROTH,, !COLLEEN & J EFF REFUND — ROOM RENTAL 200.00 200.00 2*ti 21 ` 12 '03/9,6 <. ONDER v . r: ONNE . REFUND - CHOI THEORY 40.00 40.00 29122 { P 12/0 2 N O ' BR I EN, MARY REFUND YTH BASKETBALL REGIS 42.00 42. 29124 12/03/96 THOMAS 9 , ..?EFF REFUND_ -- YTH BASKETBALL 37.00 37 «.00 1 29125 12/03/96 ST. PAUL ACCADEMY , REFUND -- GROUP OVERPAID .3.00 3.00 CELL PHONE CELL. PHONE 127.14 45.77 CELLULAR PHONE CHARGE CELLULAR PHONE CHARGE 56.66 21.78 ., 29127 12/03/96 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC. ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES ip003.38 1,033.38 29128 912.9 12/03/96 042525 aso'Acio ASTM 'ic sysTrm-q r-n-. ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 1997 REPAIR MAINTZt]ITLTIY 65.00 1-75-00 65.00 175.00 ' z , `19130 12/03/96 .0 60150, BMB REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT "39.50 39.50 29131 3 12/03/96 061600 BARS. ENGINEERING CO. PROJ 95--12 OUTSIDE ENS FEES 1, 001.,^8 1 29133 12/0 - 08 1 220 BOYER SCOTT TUITION REIMBURSEMENT - 605.32 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/02 /96 14:5q VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER PAGE 2 VOUCHER/ 4 NUMBER s 8 DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT RAI saMQUN7 s to TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 530 :30 QA 1 �, 737.54 " 29135 12/03/96 090573 BRAUN INTERTE CORP. PROFESSIONAL SERV OPEN SPACE 1 1300.00 x s 29136 14 15 12/03/96 T D ! O I VOID L • . VOID - / Is 29.137 n 22138 12/03/96 32/103/26 110850 130ZOO CATCO CWTI 1-1 SUPPLIES — VEHICLE 216«42 Z5 -Do 216.4 21 29139 12/03/96 15 400. ; -., COPY :VQUI F'MENT., INC. =SUPPLIES '.... EQUIPMENT TrQ �+ 24 29140 12/03/9 190200 DENNISON LIGHTING SUPPLIES -- EQUIPMENT 697.9 14 48 A-4 697 «59 .c^.9141 12/03/96 190500 DEPT,. # ,: PUBLIC SAFETY 3RD QTR INCA -CHAP GES 70.00 _ kD QTR SCA CHARGE 1 890. Q0 ' 3, 3bO.OQ . 914 12/03/96 260290 FARMER BROS. CO. MDSE. FOR RESALE 122.38 r3l2j -MDSE. FOR RESALE 36.90 159.28 1 4 3 12/03/96 270 304 �L4R TIM TRAVEL & TRAINING 23.11 TRAVEL TRAIN - 5►.9 .., 29144 12/03/96 300500 G & K 'SERVICES `.MAT SERVICE 34.19 34.19 !. 29145 14A 12/03/94 >zAX/9A 320266 GRAINGEk MANnma S RAKERY, ThJC�. REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT • 45.30 - 45.50 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13.75 PROGRAM SUPPLIES .. ,, IF 13.75 43 PROGR SUPPLIES 13.35 P ROGRAM SUPPLIES r . .• 13.75 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13.75 PROGRAM SUPPLIES -. . _, 13.75 -, PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13.75 151.25. f. 52 s< 29148 12/03/96 400950 JEANE THORNE TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP SERVICES FOR RECEPTIONIST vs. ewl 20152 20.52 ss 29149 12/03/96 401670 JOLLY TYME FAVORS PROGRAM SUPPLIES '34.78 34.78 VOUCHRE2 _.._...... _ .. .. . _..... , :. .:. _ _.... _.... _ _wN.. �__.. _ ...._. _... ,_ ... CITY OF MAPLEWOOD WAGE 3 12/.02/96 14:54 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER z 3 VOUCHER/ 14 ;5 NUM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT I PE - 1 TES nEE-f Or 102 37 e 25151 12/03/96 420170 KLAGER WFMDY VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 7 «28 7.28 ' 2915.^ 12/03/96. Z0 Z26 530220 53OZ7.o MEEHAN, JAMES IRE. UNIFORMS & CLOTHING RR IR 154.00 350.00 113 7 -2 35L 7 7. „ 1 29154 12/03/'96 * 1650 METkopoLLTAN COUNCIL DEC SEWAGE 'TREATMENT 193 _ 19x,192.04 '8 2 915 5 12 /03/96 540177 MIDWEST RADIATOR RADIATOR REP UNIT 542 P 6 29.2 5 62 9. 2 5 t9 ,,.. OCT 96 SURTAX t�►3.5>6 -- 3,134 « b 5 BOOKS 64.44 105.44 t .. .. REPAIR L�CC MAINTlVEH A 27 t REFAIR M ATNT /VEHICLE . 89.00 ,, 30 M 660800 NnR3:W REPAIR & MA I NT /VEHICLE 460.00 2,'820.50 31 . UTILITIES : , 08.39 7 ©. 5 4 i PROD. 95 -18 OUTSIDE ENO FEES 9, 82 5 , 38 4, i PROD 95 -18 OTHER CONST COSTS 68 0 433.21 80,513.86 ;3 .30 :39 . 29160 ::f.2 /O J'S�6 V. - 1181 f. NORTHERN AIROAS 3RINERN -HYDRALAJER INC. SUF•PLIES -� .EQUIPMENT r-LnTmTma x.27.39 79-90 127.39 c at s 2 a. 9162 1,^/03/96 661755 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES •217 IIIII 3.14 a UTILITIE S 1200 4 « 71 45 UTILITIES 1540 3.14 � UTILITIES 1975 3.14 f ` 48 UTILITIES 2268 UTTLTT rR 4.40 E 4 . 50 UTILITIES 2739 3.14 6 51 - UTILITIES 1834 8,32.bb E UTILITIES X902 1,O ?4.49 E 5a UTILITIES 345 98.18 UTILITIES 5 ;. 5s 5s UTILITIES 980 27.49 57 . UTILITIES 1315 125.80 ;. VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 12/02/96 14:54 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER VOUCHER / • 1 2 3i 51 NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 I 'III IIIES 3457 'f UTILITIES 1501 99.75 s 10; UTILITIES 1698 .37,.88 12 , UTILITIES 1775 126.28 13 14, UTILITIES 1850 111*1 IIIES 1283 110 «49 1s 16. UTILITIES 2251 114.88 1 8 UTILITIES '. 258 x.21.19 19 2, UTILITIES 2290 10.91 • UTILITIES 2358 ,�.,, 126.91 ;UTILITIES X464' .:166.73 t UTILITIES 2880 ,,, 1111 ITIES =l 96.28 - -25 :.. . UTILITIES.2981 149.89 3 UTILITIES 2991 -, 154.11 s UTILITIESS 618 _. 16.44 3 . :.: ..UTILITIES 618 . . UTILITIES 1662 23 . $8 3 3; UTILITIES 1685 80.73 3, ... .:UT I CITIES 1810 D6.38 4 . a: . .: UTILITIES 1839 UTILITIES 1845 44.88 UTILITIES 1910 136.20 E UTILITIES 2019 x.5.18 5; .'UTILITIES 2 101 7.36 UTILITIES 2659 163.07 5 UTILITIES 2659 r 88.42 UTILITIES 474 170.10 UTILITIES 741 10.12 UTILITIES 1080 64.23 E UTILITIES 1401 2 189.:0 � UTILITIES 1935 255.39 _ UTILITIES.2146 .. PRO 13.94 t UTILITIES 2 345 11.92 UTILITIES 2740 36 092 UTILITIES 2104 11.04 UTILITIES 2575 31.33 19,,810.22 VOUCHRE2 ... - : ............_. .____.__,.,: .. >�.:� :.., _ .. _ <..,,._..__. ..: ._.....__.._ ... ...._ ._w.�.,�..•,........,.._...: :.,.: CITY _ .,.,.«.........,. . .....u,rs<..,w.__=..,_...., ate. .,. ,.. .._._,.._._..- ..,....... .. OF MAPLEWOOD ,.,. �..- .�....._..,� _ , .. PAGE 5 5 12/02/96 14:54 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER ' • -' VOUCHER/: 2 a 4 NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 _. ., •. , . OcEirm —• e 'SUPPLIES — OFFICE 63.57 103.86 0 DEVELOP FILM 11«64 , ,z. • DEVELOP FILM 10.87 28.1-1 t� ,F 3 291 b5 12/0/e ;: .700735 " :: L.MA„ S TEVEN fi K•�- HANDLER :. 3 5.00 i. 35. 00 ,F 29167 12/03/76 720760 PRECI BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLIES — ..OFF REPAIR MAINT-4RAD10 '70.84 70 84 2 J_ 41 68 2' 29 ., 'x`22.,04 F' 1D METER :SERVICE, 3NC « x REF AIRS do MTNCE «,/EQU - 240.28 240.28 2 2 29169 12/03/96 741200 'RAINBOW FOODS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 67.56 z , MDSE. FOR RESALE 7.97 3 .. - .. : -.: .. 29170.2/0396 :: , : L.ht34SSOCI�►TEB RAVEi. $c TRAINING =- � 1.50. a0b _ 150.E 00 g 29171 ., 12/03/96 ., 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY REPORT "ROLL CIF MAJOR TAXPAYER :._ - 65.00 65.00 7. c. 32 _'. 9 73 12 /O /96 <'S055U _.: E NWAi T INSTITUTIONAL. -FOODS �'IIfSE. -�'flR RESALE ;386.49 323 4.. 210-02 29174 12/03/96 751450 RITZ CAMERA - FAINT $. SLIDE PROCESSING 17.09 - - 37 ,. °. f, FILM PROCESSING -: 12.18 202.518 : s� & c e 1 5, . . ..._(_f . :qu me_nt - Ur. a $� 5. at urnisin s f h ! .` SUPPLIES -- OFFICE g 37.06 5 ` s R , ; k. S SUPPLIES -- OFFICE 11.95 5 u .: SUP'P'LIES -� OFFICE 2."72 a '� - SUPPLIES •— OFFICE 5.23 E E: SUP — OFFICE 43.14 4,941.14 4 v X9176 .i `d3/5►6 `'90500 SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MN • TRAVEL TRAINING �i54.O0 654 E St u 29178 12/03/96 llono'75 800300 SEAR SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL ENO. .... CITY DUMP STUDY 350.84 i 350.84 ; ; :: 917'9 1 /03/96 TS20225 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO TIME CLOCK 432.53 ; SUP'P'LIES .... OFFICE 55.45 487.9'8 - t pill if CITY OI MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 _ `' .y 4 t 6 ' _ - -- - _ - - -- - - -k jDR- ALL.. f'1 l:" I 0DZ' 1 2 VOUCI••n:R/ + ° h'ttJMlF ;f: l4 BATE NUMBER NAI11E DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Alvl( jUl 5 6 Q '% T"•f' - 'y -. - y• : y f _ Ak1E __ -_ .__ _. __ _- . --.'-- - i!!!�`Sl F1tilAtlCE -MA CE.FiI L..:'i- - - i9.44 _.___- i 9.. i j 8 291x1 12/03/96 840295 ST P BAR & REST MDSE. FOR RESALE 25.79 25.79 9 10 29 • .�:...l.t:::'. 1� /G::irS>h 8�i0:'i00 SUNSHINE EXE'F:E.S�'� F:E�'AIE: $. MAINY /t�EF•I]:i:.LE , 8.00 28 .00 12 �, :l n -. .:.ry ' "'1.,�-- .�(.!_•- -_._ -- _. �--- -����' '-J' C'-- �t� --CLG - -__.- 1 i� i 9 - 13 14 2 9184 12/43/96 860680 TARTAN CHOIR I~'FiQGFAM SU>~'F'LIE�a 126.00 126.00 15 16 291.8 5 12 /03/96 880800 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG. SUPPLIES VEHICLE 146.33 17.48 163.81 t7 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 19 29 186 12/03/96 901 300 UPPER MIDWEST SALES CO. SClP' I Ea - JANITORIAL 198 , a.^ 198. 3 2 1 •+e ". �+ .� i' �- r "' DEC 77.0 _ 76 TRASH REMOVAL DEC 2 30.82 23 DEC: RUBBISH REMOVAL 52 1,087.29 91138 12/03/96 931300 WALSN, WILLIAM P. COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSPECTION 190.00 GOMMEt`ZCI AL PLUMB I NO I NSP'ECT I ON 190.00 -- n �+ 29 ^.�}1C�9 .:� 1.^/03 ` 6 939000 WEATHER WATCH, INC. PAGER RENTAL /WEATHER SERVICE .?84.04 ^80.00 _ 30 31 X9190 12/03/96 '940700 WESCQ DI�7F�II�UTTON, INC:. ^ � SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 45.61 45.61 291.92' . , r ).. . O3/96 r 980195 �' "` ?_'ARNOTH BRUS WORKS v INC. SUP'P'LIES -- VEHICLE 568.71 568.71 7 38 ' TOTAL CHECKS = '3 281 ­ 9 8 C. �. O 41 2 3 7 9 51 52 ' 3 56 _7 - - - - -- — -- - -- — — — , tJCH E.2 CIT 01=• MA1 1 °'AGE: J. / 22 / 96 0 0. - 1t?_ _ V0UCHE.R /CHE RE ::L• T S I_I: :F _ _ -- _ -- -- _ - _F'C)I AL.I._ F:'I :I:Z I (:)Dt:i 1 2 U CHER/ 3. 4 -CIS CH EC VENX }QF *-: VEN DOR' ITEM ITEM CF 1 E ::C.:Ic 5 IISER DAT E_* NL JINX: {r. -.:r, NAME- Dr -_ SC r.PT1ON Allot.Jl AMOUNT' P 6854 11/1- osl 1. Of.) BODI RENEE PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6.39 9 P SUPPLIES 21. 76 t0 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 18.5 12 F'Q:aTAGE 1.65 13 w)UF'F'LIE: S - RANGE:: 20.00 14 15 SUF'F'LIES EQ F'M :ANT ^ (:38 16 Ur 11:"L I r_ :s EQU 7 . 2 4 17 TR & TRAINING 2 »25 tg , SUI :*P IES - EQUIPMENT 6. 18 20 • f:, t.1F'i °'LIEN - VEHICLE* (� 8.'•41. `. PROGRAM SUPPI...I ES 1 . 3.68 22 23 ' :%t.JF'F•I._ I E EQUIPMENT I PMr.: NT 5 « f 1. 2 4 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 4.25 25 S UP'P'LI ES - OFFICE 8 . 5 7 In SUr•F� .IE S •-• VEHICLE 7.77 28 SUPP LIES " EQt.]IF'MI -NT 16 .1.0 29 MAINTENANCE:: MATERIALS 1.98 30 3t REI= 'I...ENISI•4 PETTY CASH 10. 1. 1. 32 F Ef"L.ENISH F'ETTY CASH 10.11 33 PRO(3RAM SUP'P'LIES .60 34 35 PROG SU PP LIES !6.;39 35 P(X:)TAGE 12.30 37 TRAVEL & TRAINING 3.75 34 TRAVEL & TRAINIhIG 8.00 40 PROGRAM SUPPLIES* 2 .00 41 SUPPLIES OFFICE 4. 66 42 43 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT PMENT 19.39 44 TRAVEL & TRAINING 5.00 45 TRAVEL & TRAINING 10.00 a F'R( :)t� SUP PL IES 4. 48 SUPPL - EQUIPMENT 2 . 53 49 TF AVEL & TRAI :NING 4.00 50 St StJl-'F'E..Ir -_:s -• E(: UI P ME-*NT 10.60 52 rat. PPL I ES EQU IPMENT 2 .64 64 53 S UPPLIE S tJFF l_IE E:(:)lJ[FME h i'fi' ? «48 ry { 54 x:.77 » r .,<.> 55 ss 6855 11/1.4/96 541400 MINN. STATE TREASU STATE DRI VERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 649.50 64y,,;50 57 5e - 6856 11/14/96 ; 41.440 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 20, 389.52 59 20 389.5 685 11/15/96 190400 DE OF NATURAL RESO SES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 135.00 s, 135.00 68"58 11/15/96 541.400 MINN. STATE" TREASURER R t*I - )TOR VE;:H LIC FEES PAYABLE. 12 12,457.2 5 6859 11/15/9 541 MINN. STATE TREA RER ST ATE:: X? F:I'11Fi1S LIC F PAYAB 599.50 7 599.5 686c> :f 1/1.F3/96 66 225 1 . � t . I � �. Ni7FsbJE.yTAhIK MINI�IE:,,QT'A., N.A. 11 f { F. DEDU C 92 :E4 ,1.,i£3« . �. 7 0 71 - I I- -•1'5•••.9 P /Ii ?l. 28,13 `'7 72 _X )E::X 11-15-96 P /R DEDUCTION 1.4.158 « 92 57 201 » :1.1. 73 74 - 6861 11/1.8/96 1 541.400 MINN. STATE TREA MOTOR VEIA LIC FEES PAYABLE:: 8.024.5 75 8,024. 76 t E r 4 �h1 i _�1.1t..•hlFtik :.: I .i2 ! 96 ,. I. • r V OL 1.. :l< VF. , I'T'E : :lyl ITEM CHECK 1t'1kti Ft DATE N(.1MBI : : :Fi NAME 1 }r : :. C:I=;1 :PT 1:(311 AMOUNT AMOUNT 11 /:1. 8 /96 i -:1400 I*IIl -tN« STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYAI. -E 399.25 399.25 6 863 1. /18196 WATCZAK,� LAURA RE1= UND ••- NOV MEDICA & DCA INS 123.72 12 3.7.2 6864 11/19/9­6 550:1. 50 M14 BENEF ASSO CIATION NOV PREI I I Ul l 97. 97.32 6f-')65 ll./I.9/96 541.400 MINN. TATE TIRL -:MAJRl: R MOTOR VEH LTC: FEE:: PAYABLE-:' 1 �i � ►( }c r .1 U 15 , 5()9.1 U 61j166 11/19/96 541400 MINN. S'T'A TREASURER S ti ' LIC FEES PAYABLE 6 55. 25 6 55, 25 6867 1.1/1.9/96 95 ;.i() WLI(:)LI -.ET T:;AKE ::RY F'RO6R St Jt °'I::'LII : ::;:i 139.00 139.00 tyf:3l_'If�{ 11 i :(): 9!:> :1.61.9f::() CLIEt F OOl }: F'ROC.;F:Af I allt"'PLIE�i 76.00 l6. ( } <} 6869 11/2 470775 LIT TLE CEASERS PIZZA PR ET 'LIES 225 225 '070 1.1/20/96 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEM LIC FEES PAYABLE 12,510.75 12,�10..i' i 6071 1.1/2()/96 541400 MINN. STA'T•E TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FETES PA YABLE 630.00 630.00 68 *72 11/20/96 , 22 I 11-15-96 F' /R DEDUCTION 1 3 S 382. 70 11 -'•15 -96 1=' /R DEDUCTIOl�i 16,9.26.95 30 :aUr�.6�y l / ry .I ■/• 3 1 1� 'f �I.' \I / � I.(,1(..A,U(} �{•.•. 1 . .w Y I M A . I 1 � I r: :FAA .1-- 15--96 1 1. ; 49 _ -- - - F'ERA 11 _.1 5-96 15.49 30.903 290 J.1/26/96 CENTURY ROOF I NC REFUND -- BLDG.L PERMIT 31307 74.75 L 74.'75 11/26/96 F 'LJ * IAI FRENC :M:IK, MIi ::F•IAf. RE::FUND PROGRAM MEA 27 «00 27.00 2907 *.`9 11/'26/96 PROG'T , KAREN REFUND - PARTIAL- UNDER RAINBOW 14.00 14.00 s i :; : yQ, :::() 11/26/96 FIRSTAR BANK REFUND -- DUF' PMT FALSE ALARM 215.00 215.00 1.. : " "')0 *31 ll./ - 6 CAFtir�l° 1 EI : :: COT'TACir : :: i REFUND 0000 GERVA I O (CO T'TA(x{°:;a) 17, ":300.00 R'E::F UND 0000 c7r : :N :VFt :C�s ((:[:1`1" 'AtaE °`f 1,02B. 01 18., 528 01. -- s 290 3.2.. 1.1. 6 96 MARC: L. KRU(i H -; ESCROW F'RO...J 94-1.4 11W RETAIL 1, 9 i2 « ;w8 ESCROW PRQJ 94-14 MW RETAIL. - 58.92 1 010465 A '1' & I' DIGITAL F'A(a1* -.F� M(:lt*I'1 HL -Y F °EE- :: 4.00 4 •• O() i 290 ". 11/26 /5 1 6 020C370 ALA..IED {YU :DIC :AL.. A(::i Ol. CONTROL COMMISSIONS COL.L.E :.CTION A 913.78 913.78 1.1/ 26/96 021.000 A lll* I:ZI -- DA'T'A SYSTEK11 HF' 1)ESI < :fII'1',..f1 :�'r' DIRl ° :CT CARD 1., 7 ()0. L30 - - - - -- - - - -- HP ' E. :t { :.YE : :�' D x:97.14 1.,,997.94 3 a 29036 1.1 /26/96 0 69.1. 00 1 .4441 - 41:GAIA & KID'L..I ... Y 1: ". `•'+.. 1.3.,tr 'f30.46 _..__ _ .:3.,980..46 J o� 290:':7 11/26/96 061460 1:eARNE'S ?1. NO PROGRAM SUF:'F'L.. t E: :i - -- - - - -- -- 21. r 4 :t.. 09 [:: J. l Y t:�r i•ir �r•t._i:���[:at:��� °•r��:;i::. ,.. 1/22/96 -- r)f 3 : -;i.5' t:Qt.1C F•IE F;,�:(; V C K fi:f :C :f. STE::P,'_ _ - - - - - -- - F "(:)I:', ALL F'IERIOD::; UL;FitF •IE::C K CH EC K VENDOR VENDOR IT EM M I: TEP CI••II : : :C I 1MPER DATI : :: NUMBER NAME:' DI-::*S(:' R3.PTION AMOUNT AlYlt:lU1 29038 11/2 6/96 .061725 BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL NATIONAL SALES TAX PBL . OUT OF STATE BOOKS 5.27 4.95 29 0:: 1 ? 11/26/96 061906 13AUER BUILT SUPPLIES -- VEHICLE 411.69 41:1..69 29 040 11/26/96 071.200 BEST B UY CO. SUPPLIES -- OFFICE 28.72 '22. .`9041 11/26/96 080925 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS UTILITIES 1685 4.76 UTILITIES 1s 4.. 47 UT 1902 15.87 UTILITIES 1980 1.9..17 U T 11...1:'T'I:E ::f 18 a() 1 19.67 UTILITIES 21.00 523 UTILITIES 61 4.76 612.56 :'9 042 11/26/96 1.10468 CAR GILL, INC.,SAL:.T DIVISION MAINTENANCE:.' MATERIALS 750.24 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1 » 498.04 MA 14TE14ANCE MATERIALS I p5 1. 5 c MAINTENANCE.: MATERIALS 738.34 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5,991.87 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5 0 8 94,5 4 MAINTENANCE� MATERIALS 9, 7(33.95 26,172.72 29041 11/26/96 120450 CENTER URBAN POLICY RESEARCH BOOKS 57.95 57.95 29044 1.1./26 151800 CONL.IN, KATF YN SEASON BROCHURE 495.00 495..00 29045 11/26/96 180100 D . C . A . , I NC . DENIAL CLAIMS C K RUN 11-15-96 2 2 . 537.74 29046 11/26/96 180 50 DAHL_ GLASSWORKS REPAIRS & MTNCE.- /EQUIPMENT 220.00 220.00 290 11/26/96 200830 DIRKSWAGERv COLLEEN TRAVEL & TRAINING 27.40 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 89.60 1171100 29048 11/26/96 21.0400 DRAMATIC PUBI...ISF•IING SC:RIF'TS- •TI~IE: QUIET PLACE 1.2.26 12.26 29049 11/240/96 2302130 E.L. RE I NHARDT COMPANY INC. SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 19.16 19.3 6 29050 11/26/ 250150 EPA AUDIO VISU AL..., INC. CAMERA CONTF-,'OLL.E::R /V('-F 5 5,806.3 2 9051 1.1/26/96 260960 F'1._AHE-RTY EQUIPMENT C(:)r:I °'OI:ZATIC)1 MISCELLANEOUS COMMODITIES 378.27 378.27 i 29052 11/:6/96 2 70500 F.OI:X, X: ;EA X- MAS WREATHS CAMPUS) BLDG',-*) 120.00 1.20.00 2905 11/2 6/96. 27059 FOREFRONT DT.RECT SUPPLIE -- EC)LJI "' MEI. t T• 154.1.0 1.54.10 i 290511 11/2.6/96 100500 (3 81. K C)E:RV:I:t.ES) & C;I...014•1:1:14(:) 79.28, UI OI LM: :i & C l ... OTHING 7 2. 47 1.111:I:F'C)h:hlf - 43.24 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 35. 62 L)hl 1: F' ORr l!3 & CI... ()'T'F I :f Nita 59.91 1(.Jt {'� ) ;1 7, `.% l...l. 1 T til" 1'1("11" L-l: *- WI.Jt.)1.r . .i... -r 0 {' 9 V0L)Qf :R .0 II -- IE:.CK REGISTE I::'OFt ALL PER Ch•IEC:K VE::NDOF VENDOR IT'Ei�! ITE: :M CFiE C:l: vIBE:R DATIE N(JIll--4E::R NAIJE:L DE°.SCRIf ='TION AMOUNT AMOUN'T' UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 7.47 UN I FORMS & CLOTHING 43.24 UN:I:FO & CLOTHING) 24.50 UN I I: "OF MS & CLOTH 1116 79.28 UNI FORMS FCyRMS & CLOTH 72.47 UN I1 " MS & CLOTHING 4 * , * - ). 24 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 24.50 6,90.2 29055 11/26/96 300600 G.L. BERG & ASSOCIAT CONCEIT TONIC S L FA 1. 1 29 056 11 /26/96 3 0 '::;00 GEOR GE'S BODY SHOP REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICL.E 475.00 475.00 '''90.:7 11/26/96 3 10650 GOPHER DISPOSAL OCT 96 RECYCLING 17,7:4.17 17 v 724.17 2 90 '58 11/26/96 320281. GRANDMA'S BAKERY. INC. PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES 1 3. 7 3 1 PROGRAM SUPP 1 P'RO(3RAlvI SUP'P'LIES 13.75 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13,Z5 P'F::OGRAM SUPPLIES 13 .75 PROGRAM SU P'P'LIES 7 13 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13. 1.10.0 .1 11/ 26/96 '340110 HE: JNY RENTALS INC: PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES 7.56 7.56 6 29060 11/26/96 370076 HUGHES COSTELLO FEES FOR SERVICE 566.40 566.;40 29061 11/26/96 390101 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #622 TRAVEL_ & TRAINING 16.50 16.50 290 { {2 11/x 390370 INSITUFORM CENTRAL INC. 1159' INSITUP'IP'E SEWER LINER 79 79„ :" :'9063 11/26/96 400650 J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC. APPLIANCES RECYCLED 107.00 AP'P'LIANCES RECYCLED 42.00 149.00 I 2 9064 11 /2 6/96 . 4016 3 5 JOHNSON PLASTI SUPPL - OFFI 19. 87 19.8 290 6'5 3. 1/26/96 4 3030 0 KNOWLAN ' S PROGRAM SUPPLIES 66. 66.29 ' 29066 11/26/96 4303 KNOX LUMBER CO 0212 MAINTENANCE MATE- RIAL_S 20.24 20.24 29067 11/26/96. 430850 KOVACH, MARY ANN C ONC IERT SOUTHERN MT MELODY 1,101.40 1 ,.1.01..40 ' {a�1�a(:a 1.1/�'� >/ 96 430960 KFtiE:CH IF:CIhI WORKS WROUGHT IRON FENCE* GATE 5,804.00 5 ,804.00 A'9069 11 /x'6/96 4309 70 K{"tECH ' S BUSINESS SY S�T'EM "a , I NC . REF'A I RS & i�!'T 'I�ICI °.. /L -�1. 1I1= 'MEN'T 35.00 , .. 007 y ? <� { i;7 (;1 I. 1 /.c�f i / { 1r w? 4604t - -t5 I .E;.AI JLIE (.11'� Irl,l 1`IN . C. E - I y 1. E:.tJ T FL�Mi f.! T F \AI E411 . � 5.00 } r5 �1 �� 29071. 11/26/9 490500 LUNDS'T EN , LAI%It' IE: - TRAVEL & TRA I I I I-1G -- - - --- ^ - - - - -- 15.97 1: x .. 97 � :'90 2 1:1. /; 6 96•• MEMBERSHI DUE 0. 00 30. { } I.x: ClITY OF 11 1 0 I..•�;(:11::. , :i �I� :x�� } {lt, :I. f` . _ . ----- - - - - -- - - - - r ;, -- - -- -- ____ -- - -- -- - - - -- -- ----- _.---- �.?(:►t.�Ch :;F�; �:N•IE:r:_ � tl r � , Y_1s:F_ _ ____ - F'(ar; AL.I... 1- 'I : :'R :c1>«<> - �:� UCIAE:h/ -- - -- _ �•� :t1::c :fK is .±tl {F_r4 C;htr::r:K DATE: VF::N'(�OF: rt�.�itiz -,I::F +�r:=h•int:�F�. rIAMI::: TTr: -M tit ° *lz3C 1: FIT 10111 :c'r'E ::r1 AMt UI-,l T c:r 1F ::(:h; Y ::...... ' 29 07:3 :B 11 500800 M.T.I ' D ISTR I BUTING CO « REPLACEMENT CAB 3 , �� r' « ,^ 3 3 v 477 . 23 ° 29074 11/26/9/­` 51. MAPL_EW BAKERY PR SUC'F'l...I '22 r ,.., , r, „ 29075 11/26/ 96 53 05r�0 M IH:NAF, *DS MAINTENANCE MATERI 1 3. f3 1 :a „ #:i {) , t?076 11 1.1. `« 30730 METRO ATHLETIC SUFIPL.Y MAINTENANC MATERIALS �fa(3 « 59 VOL.L..EYBAL.L.. EQUIP CARRIER 4:16«31 VB REF' STANDS 7 VIi RF:F ";l'ANUI;:3 81.8 « 07 " 29077 . 1.1./26 542200 MINI%IE'S0TA MIN & MFG. ( "0. ,r-.rI & SIGNA 2 l33. '0 SIGNS & S IGNALS 72 5 «78 SIGNS & SIGNALS 26 «38 3„ 127.. 36 ' 29078 3 11 /26/96 c��'0fi00 MUSKA LIGHT CENTER PROGRAM SUP P LIES 33.23 33.23 29 079 , 11/26/96 630015 N „ C . C w E « M « -- REGION L+ ; ^ c• ; -r MEM E�Er', �t�i I F AS �r �..�ME:NT 5.00 'F 29080 11/26/96 63 NAT I ANAL. FIRE F'F OTECT I ON . ASSN . RENEWAL NFF'A MAT ' L FIRE CODES 450 4 50 « 00 e 29013:1: A.1/26 6 630910 NATIONWIDE ADVEERTISING SERVICE EMPLOYMENT AD FOR A /F' TECH 362.32 362.. -52 2908 1 1/26/96 640804 NET LINK INTERNATIONAL REPAIRS & MTNCE . «/E QI.IIF•ME.NT 131.50 1;:31 . ? 29083 13 11. 64081.0 NE -WMAN SIGNS SIGNS & SIGNALS 2 2 2 " 290(:::4 5 11/26 660800 NOR ST. PAUL CITY OF * RENTAL OF 91 HYDRANTS 1, 380 « 00 1, 3s{? « oo 29 0_ 5 11 /26 /96 661785 N ORTH LA ND BUS , SYS INCOR Rr- :r- ' L_ACEM,.-NT REC ORD ERS 675 «0 67,51. 00 B 2 6 :L:1.1 681151 OFF I CE:.MAX S UPPLIES S - OFFICE:. 69.21. SUF'F' I: E:':. - I- XQU I F'MENT 37. o I f31. PP I I : :- ». Cl�:: -F' � t::E: 1 1 . 67 1.1 ' 290C37 11/26/96 690300 01...IVr - :: GARDEN TRAY J... & lR AINT i , -lti 1.59.32- 1 59. ; 2 3 '9088 i 11/26/96 710800 PET CONNECTION P ROGRAM SUF'F L..IE :'a 1.�`i w 1 S 18.18 2908 11/26/96 .f 1 1800 PIPE Sl:: INC" , "�1.1NIT SEWER ' . V - 3.111< h''I ::.( "T*] *(.11 4{ ., 634 0 „ 3 SANITARY ;aELklER T « V « I NS)F'E :.CT I ( : 1N 7, 746 . 20 -. r• , 2 12 a 29090 11126196 71.211: P LYMOUT H. CITY 01: POLICE OF'' I Cr - KI:Z 'rr : ::<,�T I NC 328. ; 328 29 091 1: 7 F'RIEI4E, W.11- L.IAI'rl fit- 1NL1 20.00 20.00 r 29 092 1-1/26/96 7401.40 R & T S PECIALTY, 11'4C C. r''R(:1GI;,AM SI >!1 °'I ='I» I:I':13 1 23.66 I ;� ' , . ..,....6 909 11/26/96 7 RAVIr3EY CLINIC OCT PR'll - E::MPL_OYME NT PHYS I CAL. S 50"00 __ _ _ 0(.'T PRE••- EMPLOYME14T I-'I-IY'z3l:(:;AI._^ ( I:•1:1�' »..0:'610:•1 t'Y\fIvIC:'h!'Y' C :.1_.IL CS 'Pt••h1 [' 93.00 r,r•, if, DUCIII.-Ir. Cl TV Ql*- MAI:*'l ... E:0001) 1:;'AGE 6 �� 9 6 Of..) V(')tjc"l R r f r ..R f:'OR ('_)LL PlE.R101)(C) 4 CIVIE:CK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM .117 C K cf * HMBErz DATE* NUME?l::'.R NAME DES)CRIl-'TION AMOUNT AMOUNT 7 A OCT PRE---EMPLOYMENT F"HYSICALS 93.00 1,162.00 .29094 11/26/96 741600 RAMSEY CQUHTY VOTING OTICE-M IEr,;. _N :'D TQ 1,38.26 V j- VOTING NOTICE MAILED TO V 01 E_" r 1,3 875.00 , SUPPLIES or-FIC.E. 833.00 1,846.96 11/26/96 770800 RYCO S UPPLY CC). SUP'P'LIES JANITORIAL 30.34 30. -34 29096 I1./26/96 780.300 SFY.T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES OFFICE 119.49 1c. 1,19.49 2f 29097 :1.:1./26/96 800200 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION TRAVEL TRAINING 70.00 2' SUBSC I I1 fTICONS & MEME,4Er_ 50.00 SUB".3 & MEMBENSHIPS 75.00 195.00 2-' 29099 1.1./26/96 810700 SHIELY CO. MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3 2- 2; �t, MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 12 15 3t 29099 1.1/26/96 830850 SOUTHVIEW MINNESOTA FABRICS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 31.1.1 3' :s1.1.1. 3: 29100 11/2-16/96 .840300 ST.PAUL BOOK & STATION MDSE. FOR RESALE 4.46 3 • SUPPLIES OFFICE 7.96 3 ' SUPV'L.IE:S OFFIC, 'E 3.98 3 SUPl:-**LIES OFFICE 1.07 17.47 291.01 11/26/96 840405 ST. PAUL. CITY OF PROul 96--11 OTHER CONST COSTS 417.15 4 , REPAIR ► MAINT/UTILITY 440.23 857.38 41 291.02 11/26/96 840601. S*rJ:'AUL PIONEER PRESS DAILY PAPER SUB. moR OFFICE: 21.45 21.45 4- 4f A- 9103 11/26/96 842520 STATE OF MINNESOTA %E INTERNET DIAL-UP SERVI 50.00 4' 50. 00 0 '291.04 1.1/26/96 850 39 rti SUNRAY AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 33.23 41 SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 23. 96 57.1.9 5. 291.05 11/26/96 851575 SYSTEMS SUPPLY INC. SLJI::'F*I-'f -•• I- 1.84.22 1. One., 22 '129106 11/26/96 860725 TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. REPAIRS & MTNCE./EnUIPMENt 212.40 REPAIRS & MTNCE./E0%UIPMENT 20.40 232.80 A% `9107 11/26/96 880800 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG. SUPPLIES VEHICLE 48.78 4f). 78 F 291.08 11/26/96 890980 UWS UNITED WASTE SYSTEM RECYCL 1: NO 940.00 f. WASTE ASSESSEMENT 90.20 1 291.09 11/26/96 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTH INip 128.91 F 3 2`9110 11/26/96 900180 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE 3 7 BUI ... K RATE PEV'MIT 1 004903 (35.00 7 29111. 7 11/26/96 912100 VIRTUE PRINTING SUPPLIES OFFI CE 109.38 7 109.38 -1 17 IT.)TAL CHECKS 3`? 1. n 1. 2:1..75. 1 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME. --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- AMOUNT i��amo ��� DIRECT DEPOSIT 1.1/27/96 ------ ALLENSPACH , SHERRY 3 0 9.7 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 CARLSON, THERES E 1 8 3 0.7 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 BODINE , RENEE 1,1.5 0.71 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 FAUST,DANIEL F (201) 2 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 ANDERSON, CAROLE J 9 7 7.14 DIRECT DEPOSIT ' 11/27/96 DEHN , DEBORAH 7 2 0.9 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 HANGSLEBEN , RI CHARD 1, 8 2 8.4 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 KLAGER, WENDY 1 4 5 3.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 VIGNALO , DELORES A 1 3 81.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 BEHM, LOI S 1 4 3 3.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11[27/96 CARLE , JEANETTE E 1 2 7 8.4 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 JAGOE , CAROL 1 219.4 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 OLSON , SANDRA 1 0 0 4.2 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 POWELL, PHILIP 1 3 41.4 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 ALDRIDGE , MARK 1 5 5 4.7 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 BECKER, RONALD D 2 ,121.4 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 BOHL , JOHN C 2 0 7 9.8 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 FLOR, TIMOTHY 1 3 5 3.02 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 KVAM, DAVID 1, 8 5 0. 0 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 STEFFEN, SCOTT L 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 YOUNGREN , JAMES 2 , 0 2 9.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 EVERSON , PAUL 1 3 5 6.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 ERASER, JOHN 1 910.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 SAUNDERS , SARAH 1 1 :vAL CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 2 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER -- DATE EMPLOYEE NAME -------------- ------------------ AMOUNT — _--- .__- _-._ DIRECT DEPOSIT -- - - - - -- 11/27/96 ADELSON , LINDA 8 7 8.0 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 STAHNKE ,JULIE A 1 1 5 9 8.0 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 HAIDER, KENNETH G 2,787o59 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 1 5 7 5.51 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 LUNDSTEN , LANCE 1 9 6 5.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 OSWALD , ERI CK D 1 6 7 0.8 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 DUCHARME , JOHN 1, 415.51 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 MATTHYS , RUS S 2 ,15 9.5 l DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 PECK , DENNI S L 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 ANDERSON , BRUCE 2 , 3 9 2.9 0 D IRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 BURKE , MYLES R 1,478,17 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 MARUSKA, MARK A 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 GREW- HAYMAN , JANET M 7 5 9.7 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 BARTA, MARIE 1 2 3 7.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 COLEMAN,MELINDA 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 EKSTRAND., THOMAS G 1 1 6 - 76931 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11127/96 ROBERTS , KENNETH 1 711.9 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 STAPLES , PAULINE 2 ,101.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 EASTMAN , THOMAS E 1 8 9 3.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 OLSON , RONALD J 1 3 2 9.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 HURLEY , STEPHEN 1 7 8 3.9 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J 1 7 2 5.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 EDGE , DOUGLAS 1 5 4 5.7 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 CROS SON , LINDA 11265991 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD J CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT rrrrrrrr�rrrrrrrrr rrr�rrrrrw�rr T DIRECT DEPOSIT rr�rr�rr 11/27/96 r�r�rrw�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrw�rrrr�rr� LIVINGSTON,JOYCE L 697.08 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN 1,12 8.31 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 KNAUSS , PETER 711.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 SALITROS , DARLENE 6 9 5.4 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 PALMA, STEVEN 1 9 5 9.51 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 JOHNSON , KEVIN 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 WARMAN , ROBIN 842,64 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 AFFOLTER, PENNY J 5 6 7.6 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 HURT , CAROL J 15 6.0 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 KANE ,MICHAEL R 1 9 23.4 2 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 DOHERTY , KATHLEEN M 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 JENSEN , MATTHEW 7 8 0.6 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 PLACHECKI ,MELISSA J 7 7.5 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 LE , SHERYL 11/27/96 DOWDLE,VIRGINIA 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DE POSIT 11/27/96 HEINZ,STEPHEN J 2 ,195.33 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 COLEMAN, PHILIP 437972 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 BASTIAN , GARY W 352904 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 SAVAGEAU, STEPHEN D 9 4 7.5 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 ROSSBACH, GEORGE 3 09.7 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 FRY , PATRI CIA 876935 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 LUT Z , DAVID P 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 SCHLINGMAN , PAUL 1 5 7 3.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/27/96 ESTEVEZ , DIANE 12 6.0 0 J CHECK NUMBER ------ - - - - -- DI.RECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 55573 55574 55575 55576 55577 55578 55579 55580 55581 55582 55583 55584 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 4 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 11/27/96 GRAF,MICHAEL 649.08 11/27/96 AAMODT, MICHELLE 474996 11/27/96 VORWERK , ROBERT E 2 11/27/96 NAGEL,BRYAN 1 1 604916 11/27/96 GUI LFO I LE , KAREN E 1 1 213 .14 11/27/96 HELLE,KERRY 1 11/27/96 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1 11/27/96 BARTEL,DENISE 50.00 11/27/96 OSTER,ANDREA J 1,337.11 11/27/96 ANDREWS,SCOTT A 2 11/27/96 RUNNING,ROBERT 1 11/27/96 ZWTEG, SUSAN C 1 038, 87 11/27/96 C,A.RLSON , DALE 309977 11/27/96 KOPPEN,MARVIN 309.77 11/27/96 CASAREZ,GINA 1 11/27/96 CRAIG,WILLIAM P 75.00 11/27/96 DAWSON,CRAIG W 2 11/27/96 ELIAS,KATHLEEN M 198900 11/27/96 HENSLEY,PATRICIA 69.72 11/27/96 MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A 3 11/27/96 SONNABEND,STEVEN M 308.00 11/27/96 PIEKARSKI,GREGORY J. 34.50 11/27/96 CUDE,LARRY J 348900 11/27/96 MIKISKA,WILLIAM 216.80 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 5 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER - - DATE EMPLOYEE NAME - - - - -- .------------ AMOUNT - - - -- ------ - - -- 55585 -- - - - - -- 11/27/96 ------------------------ DeBILZAN,JUDY - 537.85 55586 11/27/96 MATHEYS,ALANA K (202) 1 55587 11/27/96 SELVOG,BETTY D 185.25 55588 11/27/96 JOHNSON,BONNIE 686.19 55589 11/27/96 KELSEY,CONNIE L 814.46 55590 11/27/96 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1 55591 11/27/96 KOLASA,JOSEPH 6910 55592 11/27/96 JACKSON, MARY L 474.95 55593 11/27/96 MARTINSON,CAROL F 1 1 496.90 55594 11/27/96 PALANK,MARY KAY 1,435.46 55595 11/27/96 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1 55596 11/27/96 RYAN,MICHAEL 2 55597 11/27/96 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1 55598 11/27/96 BAKKE,LONN A 1 55599 11/27/96 BANICK,JOHN J 2 55600 11/27/96 BARTZ,PAUL 1 55601 11/27/96 BELDE,STANLEY 1 55602 11/27/96 BOWMAN,RICK A 2 55603 11/27/96 DUNN,ALICE 1 55604 11/27/96 HERBERT,MICHAEL J 1,796.22 55605 11/27/96 HIEBERT,STEVEN 1 1 418.78 55606 11/27/96 RAZSKAZOFF,DALE 1 55607 11/27/96 ROSSMAN,DAVID A 1 55608 11/27/96 SERVATKA,MICHAEL L 11176.53 CHECK NUMBER 55609 55610 55611 55612 55613 55614 55615 55616 55617 55618 55619 55620 55621 55622 55623 55624 55625 55626 55627 55628 55629 55630 55631 55632 0 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 11/27/96 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 1 11/27/96 SKALMAN,DONALD W 2 11/27/96 STAFNE,GREGORY L 1 11/27/96 STILL,VERNON T 1 11/27/96 STOCKTON,DERRELL T 1 11/27/96 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 1 11/27/96 THIENES,PAUL 1 11/27/96 WATCZAK,LAURA 1 11/27/96 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 1 11/27/96 BERGERON,JOSEPH A 2 11/27/96 KARIS,FLINT D 2 11/27/96 MEEHAN,JAMES 2 11/27/96 MELANDER,JON A 2 11/27/96 RABBETT,KEVIN 2 11/27/96 THOMALLA,DAVID J 1 11/27/96 HEWITT,JOEL A 2 11/27/96 ADRIAN, SCOTT W. 429.00 11/27/96 EMBERTSON,JAMES M 1 11/27/96 FECHT,MICHAEL J 115.50 11/27/96 WILLIAMS,DUANE J 412.50 11/27/96 BOYER,SCOTT K 1 11/27/96 FEHR,JOSEPH 1 11/27/96 FLAUGHER,JAYME L 1 11/27/96 HALWEG,KEVIN R 2 0 7 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 55633 11/27/96 LAFFERTY,WALTER 1 55634 11/27/96 PETERS, JILL 1 55635 11/27/96 RABINE,JANET L 1 55636 11/27/96 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1 55637 11/27/96 DAHL,HELENE M 617.44 55638 11/27/96 DARST,JAMES 1 55639 .11/27/96 FREBERG,RONALD L 1 55640 11/27/96 HELEY,RONALD J 1 55641 11 / 2 7/ 9 6 MEYER, GERALD W 1 715.6 2 55642 11/27/96 ELIAS,JAMES G 1 55643 11/27/96 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 1 55644 11/27/96 PRIEBE,WILLIAM 1 55645 11/27/96 KRUMMEL,BARBARA A 641.35 55646 11/27/96 ANDERSON,ROBERT S 1 55647 11/27/96 HELEY,ROLAND B 1 55648 11/27/96 HINNENKAMP,GARY 1 55649 11/27/96 KIMLINGER, MATT 296.00 55650 11/27/96 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 1 55651 11/27/96 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 1 55652 11/27/96 SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES 1 55653 11/27/96 HORSNELL,JUDITH A 823.99 55654 11/27/96 HUTCHINSON,ANN E 1 55655 11/27/96 KLEBBA, NANCIE L. 41.25 55656 11/27/96 MACY,RITA 74.38 7 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 8 CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 'EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 55657 11/27/96 NELSON,JEAN 863.71 55658 11/27/96 MISKELL,NANCY 570914 55659 11/27/96 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1 55660 11/27/96 .ANDERSON,EVERETT 383.23 55661 11/27/96 OSTROM,MARJORIE 1 55662 11/27/96 WENGER,ROBERT J 1 55663 11/27/96 BALLESTRAZZE,THAD M 119000 55664 11/27/96 BUCKHOUT,KRISTA D 31.50 55665 11/27/96 CHASE,TANIA 126.00 55666 11/27/96 DRALLE,SARA M 325.50 55667 11/27/96 EKSTRAND,BRIAN 94.50. 55668 11/27/96 ENGELDORF,KRI8TIN M 33.00 55669 11/27/96 FINN,GREGORY S 1 55670 11/27/96 LOMBARDI,JAMES D 402.58 55671 11/27/96 MORIN,DIANE E 195.75 55672 11/27/96 RENSTROM,MARK D 154.00 55673 11/27/96 SCHUBERG,ROBERT S. 120.75 55674 11/27/96 SPENCER,WILLIAM 31.50 55675 11/27/96 STEINBRING, THOMAS 105.00 55676 11/27/96 STEINBRING,MELISSA 114900 55677 11/27/96 STIEN,MARY 599.72 55678 11/27/96 STIEN,NATHANIEL 171.50 55679 11/27/96 VOGEL,PAUL R 48.00 55680 11/27/96 WARREN,ELLEN P 33.00 8 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD a CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 55681 11/27/96 BREHEIM,ROGER W 1 55682 11/27/96 EDSON,DAVID B 1 55683 11/27/96 GERMAIN,DAVID 1 55684 11/27/96 NADEAU,EDWARD A 1 55685 11/27/96 NORDQUIST,RICHARD 1 55686 11/27/96 THOMAS- JR,STEVEN 1 55687 11/27/96 ATKINS,KATHERINE 509.47 55688 11/27/96 COONS,MELISSA 474.03 55689 11/27/96 COURTEAU,BARBARA 199.13 55690 11/27/96 GLASS,JEAN 675.58 55691 11/27/96 HOIUM,SHEILA 612.78 55692 11/27/96 JOHNSON, NICHOLAS W. 367.25 55693 11/27/96 KELLY,LISA 661.34 55694 11/27/96 MEINKE,JENNY 128.25 55695 11/27/96 PETERSON,KAYLENE 492946 55696 11/27/96 PETERSON,RICHARD 496.73 55697 11/27/96 SOLUM,PETER B 26.00 55698 11/27/96 ANDERSON,JULIE M 63.00 55699 11/27/96 ARCAND,CHRIS A 105.00 55700 11/27/96 BADEN,MATHIAS 305.51 55701 11/27/96 BELISLE,BREA 89.38 55702 11/27/96 BUTALA, SANDRA A. 30.00 55703 11/27/96 CHAPMAN,JENNY A 263.20 55704 11/27/96 CONLIN,PAMELA 130.75 a CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 10 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 55705 11/27/96 CORNER,AMY L 30.00 55706 11/27/96 DOTSON,ALISHA 78.00 55707 11/27/96 FOLMAN, BENJAMIN 61.50 55708 11/27/96 GARNER,WILLIAM E 111.00 55709 11/27/96 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 90.00 55710 11/27/96 HAWKINS,LISA A 50.00 55711 11/27/96 HOULE,DENISE L 72.00 55712 11/27/96 IKHAML,JOHN 288.36 55713 11/27/96 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 140.63 55714 11/27/96 JOVONOVICH,TODD R 170.63 55715 11/27/96 KAUFMAN,GINA 498.25 55716 11/27/96 KOEHNEN,MARY B 433.00 55717 11/27/96 KOEPKE,JENNIFER M 237.00 55718 11/27/96 LIVINGSTON,KELLY 361.63 55719 11/27/96 LUHRS,BETHANY L 198.00 55720 11/27/96 MAGNUSON,BETH M 86.00 55721 11/27/96 MARUSKA,ERICA 62.00 55722 11/27/96 MEISEL,TAMBREY 8.75 55723 11/27/96 MI.SCHE -JOHN, ROSAMUND 126.00 55724 11/27/96 MOREHEAD,JESSICA R 33.00 55725 11/27/96 McQUILLAN,ANNE S 24.00 55726 11/27/96 NESS, AUTUMN M. 50.40 55727 11/27/96 NORTHQUEST,JONEEN L 15.00 55728 11/27/96 OWEN,JONATHAN 36.50 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE -- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- 55729 11/27/96 55730 11/27/96 55731 11/27/96 55732 11/27/96 55733 11/27/96 55734 11/27/96 55735 11/27/96 5.5736 11/27/96 55737 11/27/96 55738 11/27/96 55739 11/27/96 55740 11/27/96 55741 11/27/96 55742 11/27/96 55743 11/27/96 55744 11/27/96 55745 11/27/96 55746 11/27/96 55747 11/27/96 55748 11/27/96 55749 11/27/96 55750 11/27/96 55751 11/27/96 55752 11/27/96 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 11 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT POWERS,JESSICA 267.85 REGESTER, DOUG 50.00 SCHLUETER,LOUISE E 36900 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 344995 SCHONES, BRANDON 12.00 SENARIGHI, CYNTHIA 30900 SIMONSON,JUSTIN M 489.04 SMITLEY,SHARON L 124.00 STACKPOLE,JOHN A 110.50 STEVENS,MARY CATHERINE 72.00 SWANER,JESSICA 60.94 THIBODEAU,KELLY M 552.95 TIBODEAU,HEATHER J 68.40 WALKER,DARYL D 81.25 WARNER,CAROLYN 156.00 WEDES,CARYL H 108.00 WEISS, MARISSA 204.00 WESTBERG,JENNIFER 116.25 BOSLEY,CAROL 92.81 CHRISTENSEN,JODIE 324.86 FLEMING,KATHY A 30.00 JACOBSON,REBECCA L 648.00 McDILL,LAYL M 45.00 OLEARY,VIRGINIA 20.77 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 55753 11/27/96 RENSLOW,RITA 169.20 55754 11/27/96 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 157.50 55755 11/27/96 SPANGLER,EDNA E 117.00 55756 11/27/96 VRUNO, JESSICA 81.00 55757 11/27/96 VRUNO, JOANNE G. 39.00 55758 11/27/96 ANDERSON,MICHELE 126.75 55759 11/27/96 AUER,DANIEL 453.60 55760 11/27/96 BAILEY,DEANNA L 199095 55761 11/27/96 BEHAN, JAMES 1 55762 11/27/96 CHRISTENSEN,JANET 352.09 55763 11/27/96 ERSFELD,ALICE L 111.60 55764 11/27/96 GANJE,MELISSA M 36900 55765 11/27/96 JAHN,DAVID J 1 55766 11/27/96 JAQUES,THOMAS 161.25 55767 11/27/96 MARSHALL, BRIAN J. 153.00 55768 11/27/96 MILLS,DEREK 153.45 55769 11/27/96 NEWMAN,KELLY M 168.00 55770 11/27/96 PURVIS,TIM T 163950 55771 11/27/96 RICHBURG,KHARI S 82950 55772 11/27/96 SEEGER,GERALD F 232.15 55773 11/27/96 STEINHORST, JEFFREY 165.00 55774 11/27/96 SWANSON,LYLE 1 55775 11/27/96 SWANSON,VERONICA 677.97 55776 11/27/96 MULVANEY,DENNIS M 11883.87 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1 , 1 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 55777 11/27/96 PRIEM, STEVEN A. TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS 13 AMOUNT 1,347.66 273,745.39 Faw ;L MEMORANDUM Action by Conan oil TO: City Manager Endorsed . FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Modifi ed SUBJECT: Final Plat Rejected. _. PROJECT: Hazelwood Forest LOCATION: Barclay Street, north of County Road C DATE: November 26, 1996 INTRODUCTION Mario Cocchiarella is requesting that the city council approve the Hazelwood Forest final plat. Mr. Cocchiarella represents Maplewood Development, Inc. This final plat would create 20 lots for new houses on Barclay Street, north of County Road C. (See the maps on pages 2 and 3 and the proposed final plat on page 4.) BACKGROUND On. October 17, 1996, the city council approved a street width code variation, front yard setback variances and a preliminary plat for 21 lots for Hazelwood Forest. The preliminary plat approval was subject to 7 conditions. (See the preliminary plat on page 5 and the minutes starting on page 6.) 3 DISCUSSION Mr. Cocchiarella started building the plat the last week of October and is now installing the utilities and street. He has not yet submitted to staff the covenants or deed restrictions (Condition 6) the council required. He has met all the other conditions the council required to approve the final plat. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Hazelwood Forest final plat. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The staff shall not release the plat for recording until the developer submits the final copy of the required deed restrictions and covenants to the staff. This is for staff approval before he takes them to the county with the final plat. 2. The developer recording with Ramsey County the wetland easement, deed restrictions and covenants required by the city. The wording of these documents shall be subject to staff _ approval. p:sec3/hazelforfin Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Proposed Final Plat 4. Preliminary Plat 5. 10 -17 -96 council minutes 6. Proposed Final Plat (separate attachment) Attachment 1 VADNAIS HEIGHTS 61 ' COUNTY RD. . D c 0 COUNTY o� 0 L man 3ke COUNTY K S } U WE. O � EXTANT AVE. ,fir 0 U W U KOHLMAN /1 W ROAD � C � co CZ 0 N NOR or icy � 19 a RADATZ Mir r`�.�orn Rr4M1 i oft SEY COUNTY COURT • J N � ri w KOHLMAN s AVE. .err '� ''••�•'• � � Pat* � P 2 o EDGEHILL RD. AVE. DEMONT AVE GERVAIS AVF. 1 � 17) G cope r � LARK n m [ - M< on 2 1 u AVE t; BROOKS AVE. EL • t� SFN TANT z Four AVE. S�oaor� 4 O �v 3 4. �- GMAIS w GERVAIS 2. t. SUMM(T GT. CT. � g N Y VIKING CSR. - H 2. COUNiRYV1EW dR. S`r iii �' 3. G ' � j O 3. DULUTH CT. 4. LYDU1 ST. C;; ;. , AVE- � " ''�t,�,� � � LARK AVE. a. @ BEAM L man 3ke COUNTY K S } U WE. O � EXTANT AVE. ,fir 0 U W U KOHLMAN /1 W ROAD � C � co CZ 0 N NOR or icy � 19 a RADATZ Mir r`�.�orn Rr4M1 i oft SEY COUNTY COURT • J N � ri w KOHLMAN s AVE. .err '� ''••�•'• � � Pat* � P 2 o EDGEHILL RD. AVE. DEMONT AVE GERVAIS AVF. 1 � 17) G cope r � LARK n m [ - M< on 2 1 u AVE t; BROOKS AVE. EL • t� SFN TANT z Four AVE. S�oaor� 4 O �v �- GMAIS w GERVAIS GRAWOMEW AVE. 2 CT. Y VIKING CSR. - H I; t AVE- 1 Il - od Loks . w.... u ..,�,. AV E. COPE C;; ;. , AVE- � " ''�t,�,� � � LARK AVE. a. LOCATION MAP 2 Q N Attachment 2 ' 4 i Z' 3. 4 9 a•c o 274 V 0 3 33 4a cc 26iQ'll Aac ftio ............... Lo %4 • 3p., E 00 f �S 300 6 4- 0 �� I 1 i3 7 58 57 56 5 54 o, �o m 3. 0 41 4 y + 9 Q9 �C N l + cc m i m 272 � z i (P—) °_9 1 4 ■ b2 4 • e•::•::• :•::r. ::.• :.•.• :.• :.•.•.•:...•. •:•:r :::.�:•::•:•:� :.:...... ..::: 1 1 1 ` I C :.:.:... :..::... ::::.... 5 r%: r..:.: r::.:.:r::r ::.:.:.:.::.:.::. •:�.•.•. ..•.•.•.•..... . o ......................... ............ ". ) Do N AV :....:..... :.:.......:.:....... ; ........... ............ de ru :•:•: :_ ���� :::_:��::�::•:::.::•::...... 269 00 ....•.. :.•: ::. ::::::::..•.• .............. . N � SITE f:: .::r.:::: :::: ::.:...'...... : :.: -------- : .................. ------------------ n .•. :::•..: :.•.• :.•............ti.•, :::•:•. 0 8 pl a 4, o 00 9 g Q 17 K. KKKKT! o 6 M., • •�•�•�r••�•�•�•:� :�:� �.;: : :. :: : :.• .............,.:. �.:•::•:: 00 c , � .7G do .:.•: ;::;;rr. ; •: , . , . 7 Co .. %.• Q c o i:•: ............... ............•.•.•.•....:• : :.•.. 31 3: ss�:: •: .:• :..• :.• :.:•:•.:r ::•::;r•:. t8d' r,7' 33 �, K 263.1 .S' R - T ., rr, M f rn 11 •T . , . 'lo, �5Aw 9 I I .110 264 4?. (2-) 30; 1E 41 FIRE t� I STATION r Co Rio I 'Cr I , ° , I 415 so AC) � ( 9 is .� � � �• t 114 p �E 6 0 5 �c . •.,. � — r. o f O— '. .( -395) - '2 (-.393) i O �• 1 L 34 (2; 020 kz 6 PROPERTY LINE / MAP 3 Q. N r o t 2 79.4: C W 50� I m 'N • , 2 06. 43' Q i I Q 352 C 3C of PROPERTY LINE / MAP 3 Q. N Attachment 3 PROPOSED FINAL PLAT HAZELWOOD FOREST 4 t i r t 1 •. �~i .6. ► � •fib :.S ra I),• r .. •' ' � . v � �[ O � • "� � / fie► 4��'; .., • � :�. \ °� Lb •. a '� ' v' • L / \� � ° 1° i _ � TO si V- Z ,—�'j IL ok 4 '000 I • OR po 4 ~ - .1 . - . • —• \f 01 09 a,'g _,,. �♦ b �• yt --at 9-• • X71 i �• / • \ \ U ' s�.. t, -- '- �.9• •... •40 L O "b t jo t s =.• + /� C) e + `.• 1 fit' L r `- '"+•+ — /l. � i V to ♦ • -� � , g ' _ ... OL r PVT. V _ • U ile Cal ^• ' IL i r ' 4 jo 0 1 lit It .. 1 a . ► :, y �,. 4A 1 t ,.� % �� • � moo. � Sovt* vIr 0 10 t - 51 lb `• S ir to "•!► of ter Sir r/t et s.�c jt r T? So,.•• ••e of r w Sw • /t or Sec. J PROPOSED FINAL PLAT HAZELWOOD FOREST 4 t i Attachment 4 y O O J p AiG J T PPP P I' N S ;z:s § N c LA 5 1 ' 14 w Chia P o °< I � r; ; Fib, iy N En i•. Q �_ n O C r .� v 2 O O N rn V � y • _ 5 i C s V < N VI ft o O N z z � o 'L7 < r "' r O M IE 1n z 0 O O M Ic M O M Z -1 k . GGG� O L M �� \ z am M o Nor" m; M gz o I O� o� m v'0 rn Z3m 0 N S M N . s 4 ag < p i • �s� , !: . R/* UNE 1 n f , 3 i� •r } I \\ f Ip SJDE L01 LINE • j f. Jf s � � •'�^ L ,� ,8 s s g i j F co ' 8 Y 1 "•. �,.. " f f , �rw�rw�rs� .' �'. • � � I COUNTY ROA v • } wJ^ - .. ::.... ::: eouNT a0AD - -. . . . ....................... :Y z ^� O N r tt N f r 0 30 • ?p Vi �rb � ._ 30 c I °_ s = a • ►� Z z • ° w N Vt b V 0 • � C LT V C N w �o w � r+ g v 4 LL i 'r - r%rnrl i■■ILI w nv r%i AT ! J o � S � r rl C L 11YI I IN H n 11 V L= Jw% 1 5 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, October 14 1996 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Attachment 5 Meeting No 96 020 2. Hazelwood Forest Preliminary Plat (County Road C) a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor. Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: Ken Adolph, Schnell & Madsen Architects, Engineers for the project Chuck Pierson., 1485 County Road C - . East Kathryn Irvin. 2707 Hazelwood Street Patrick O'Brien, 2.759 Hazelwood Street Christeen Stone, 2727 Hazel -wood Street FOLLQWING DISCUSSION, MAYOR BASTIAN MOVED TO TABLE THIS ITEM, I -2, AND ITEMS I -3 AND J -2 THRU J-7. UNTIL 4:30 P.M. OCTOBER 17, 1996 SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ROSSBACH AYES -ALL 19 10 -14 -c Meeting 96.20 of the Maplewood City Council, continued from October 14, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 4:30 P.M. by Mayor 2. Hazelwood Forest Preliminary Plat (County Road C)• Continued, Street-Width Code Variation 0 me, 41 W-11 ,, I 11-114-114-V e4efs) 1 1111:4 lie rTs NITA WT 96 - 10 - 117 STREET WIDTH CODE VARIATION WHEREAS, the City Engineer requested a variation from the City Code. WHEREAS, this Code variation applies to the Hazelwood Forest development that would be north of County Road C. east of the Ramsey County Trail. WHEREAS, the legal description for this :property is: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 3. Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota; described as follows; Lots 10 and 11, Gardena Addition WHEREAS, Section 29- 52(a)(9) of the Maplewood City Code requires that local residential streets shall be 32 feet in width, measured between faces of curbs. WHEREAS, the City Engineer is proposing a 23- foot -wide street with no parking on one side. WHEREAS, this requires a variation of four feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows: - The Maplewood Planning Commission did not review this request. The Ma plewood City Council held a public hearing on September 23, 1996 about the proposed plat. City staff ?hue' lished a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and to present written statements.. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff. The Maplewood City Council continued their review of the proposed plat on October 14, 1996. The Council gave everyone at the meeting a chance to speak and to present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from City staff. NOW, THEREFORE., BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the above- described variation subject to the following conditions: a) no parking on the west side of the street. b) the developer paying the City for the cost of no- parking signs. C) that there be no outside storage of recreational or commercial, vessels or vehicles in the front yard setback. 22 10 -14 -c- Front Yard Setback Variance 96 - 10 - 118 FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development requested a variance from the zoning ordinance. WHEREAS, this variance applies to property on the north side of County Road C. east of the Ramsey County*Trail in the proposed Hazelwood Forest development. The legal description is: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota; described as follows; Lots 10 and 11, Gardena Addition WHEREAS, Section 36.70 of the City Code requires a 30 -foot front yard setback for houses. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing front yards of 15 to 20 feet. WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 10 to 15 feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 10 The Planning Commission did not review this request. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on September 23, 1996. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. 30 The City Council continued discussion of the proposed development on October 14, 1996. The Council gave everyone at the meeting a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City*Council approve the above - described variance for the following reasons: 1. .Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property and not created by the property owner. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, since the applicant would lessen the grading and tree loss on the site. 3. Since all the houses on the same street would have the same front yard setback, they would all be located consistently with each other. 4. The unique features of this plat include its topography, flora and fauna, and its relationship to the drainage of the surrounding area. 5. The Council feels a variance would contribute to the preservation of the developer's stated values for lots. 8 1 n -14 -c' Preliminary Plat f. Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Hazelwood Forest Dreliminary ,( recei v d by the Ci tx on September 16. 1996 OR Onti on one the r eceived on October 1, 1996) The develorPr shall com 1p ete following before the City Council ap nroves the final. 1� at• 1. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or contractor will.: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b,*.Place temporary orange safety fencing, silt fence and signs at the grading limits. c. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling, grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign design and location before the contractor installs them. d. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries. e. Have NSP install street lights in two locations; near the intersection of County Road G and Barclay Street and at the end of Barclay Street that ends in a cul -de -sac. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. f. Provide all required and necessary easements. Obtain the necessary approval from the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority for putting the sanitary sewer across their property and for any grading or storm sewer work. on their property. g. Remove - all junk, scrap metal. debris, and the shed. h. Cap and seal all wells on site; remove septic systems or drainfields. i. Remove the existing curb cut on County Road C. repair the street and sod the boulevard. j. Pay for the installation of no- parking signs on one side of the street if the council approves a street -width code variation for the plat. 2.* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These flans shall. include grading, utility, drainage. erosion contro, tree, trail and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the City code. b. The grading plan shall: 1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contours for each home site. 2) Include contour information for the land that the street construction will disturb. 3) Include sufficient pon*ding area to control the rate and volume of storm run -off from the subdivision to pre - development levels for the critical 100 year storm event either on the site or off the site at the developer's option. 4) Show housing styles and grading where the developer can save large trees. 24 10 -14 -0-, A It c.* The tree plan shall: 1) Be approved by the City- Engineer before site grading or final plat approval. 2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees and its plan to prevent damage under tree crowns for all trees to be saved. 3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous trees shall be at least two and one half (2 1/2) inches in diameter and shall be a mix of .red and white oaks and sugar maples. The coniferous trees shall be at least eight (8) feet tall and shall be a mix of native species. 4) Show no tree removal or disturbance beyond the approved grading and tree limits. d.* Construct an eight - foot -wide paved walkway and fencing between Lots 9 and 10 from Barclay Street to the Ramsey County Regional Trail and from Fitch Road to the Ramsey County Regional Trail. The developer also shall provide a fence or berm on both sides of the trail and shall install posts at each end of the trail to prevent cars or trucks from using the trail. These trail segments shall be over the proposed. sanitary sewer. The developer or contractor shall build the entire trail and any required fencing with the street and before the City Council approves the final plat or occupancy of the first home in the plat. The City Engineer must approve these plans. Maplewood is requiring the developer to pay for the trail since trail will provide the new residents access to the Ramsey County Trail and provide access for sanitary sewer maintenance. 3.* Secure and provide all required easements for the development including any off - site drainage and utility easements. 4. Provide wetland easements over the wetlands on site. The easements shall cover the wetlands and any land within 25 feet surrounding the wetlands. The easement shall. prohibit any building or structures within 25 feet of the wetlands or any mowing, cutting, filling, grading or dumping within 25 feet of the wetlands or within the wetlands. The purpose of the easements is to protect the water quality of the wetlands from fertilizer, run -off and to protect the wetland habitat from encroachment. 5. Show the wetland boundaries on the .plat as delineated on the site or within 100 feet of the site. A trained and qualified person must delineate the wetlands. This person shall prepare a wetland delineation report. The developer shall submit this wetland information to the Watershed District office. The Watershed District must approve this information before the city approves a final plat. If needed, the developer shall change the grading plans and plat to meet Maplewood's wetland regulations. 6. Record a covenant or deed restriction with the final plat that prohibits driveways on Lots 1 and 20 from going onto County Road C. 10 25 10 -14 -1- 7. .Obtain a'permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading and any wetland filling. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the Director of Community Development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final. plat. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all F- 3 Action by Cet .eiJ. MEMORANDUM E ndorse d-. TO: City Manager Modifie FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Rejected SUBJECT: Planning Commission Code Change Date DATE: November 7, 1996 INTRODUCTION On October 17, 1996, the city council discussed the membership and size. of the planning commission. The council directed staff to prepare an ordinance to change the size of the planning commission from eleven to nine members. BACKGROUND On October 7, 1996, Lester Axdahl resigned from the planning commission. This now leaves the planning commission with nine active members. DISCUSSION As drafted, the code amendment changes the size of the planning commission from eleven to nine members. It also updates the rest of the code language about the commission, including changing the gender - specific language in the code. COMMISSION ACTION On November 4, 1996, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed ordinance. On November 25, 1996, the city council approved first reading of the proposed ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the ordinance starting on page 2. This ordinance changes the size of the planning commission and updates the code language about .th.e planning commission. kr /p: /misc /pcord. mem Attachment: Proposed Code change ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AMENDING PARTS OF CHAPTER 25 OF THE CITY CODE ABOUT THE PLANNING COMMISSION. The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances (I have crossed out the deletions and underlined the additions): Section 1. This section changes Section 25 -17 as follows: Sec.25 -17. Established, The Maplewood City Council a tablishes for the city a planning rrn.r.+ i.r...rr.i■ iii commission as an advisory board to the city council, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 462.351 through 462.364. Section 2. This section changes Section 25 -18 as follows: Sec. 25 -18. Advisory body; exceptions. All actions of the advisory planning commission shall be in the nature of recommendations to the City council, and the said commission shall have no final authority about any matters, except as the council may lawfully delegate authority to it. Section 3. This section changes Section 25 -19 as follows: Sec. 25 -19. Composition; appointment; qualifications; berms. (a) The planning commission shall h, ave Dine tic -oar ) members appointed by the city council the members, shall be residents of the city and may hold an elected City „gublic .office. Wh „ g gssible, the council shall select r&mmission ,membe s to a resent the various areas of the city and o h212, meet the - e s of th esidents. mho . Ub The citycouncil shall appgint members of the p com 'ss`o r. t ree ear terms. The city shall divide the Membershig il3to three g roup s of .three memb ers each. The terms of the three me bers in the same g roup shall end in the same. a r. If the a int ent is to fill a vacancy, the appointment would be to finish the unexpir d part of the vacated term. All terms shatl expire on, December thirty first of th, e��ear in which the a„ ointment ends. 2 • r • • r •�• • M• • I L-1-A • w • •'• • • ill W ■ r • - • I I I L-J I [ILWJM4 I I • LWJ ' • ■ ""k- • • • t e • • v • M• r • - a v • • M • 7- • v aq I I I a ILI" • • • _ WJ • • r Section 4. This section changes Section 25 -20 as follows: Sec. 25 -20. Officers generally. The Oannina commission shall elect a chaimerson and a vice chairperson _at _this c and D iann i ng commission meeting in Janua sac ear. The c ai a son shall be re sible_for ca lling and resi in t m eeting s and shall have an qqUaLvote With Other m m ers of the commission. If the chairp is not at a meeting, the is c it ers assume the ll. assum the duties of the chairperson for that meetin . 1f the chai er on resi s rom. o is othe i e no .ion er on the tannin mission he v'ce chaff erson s hall becom2 t e actin on jjntil the planning commisslon„ can „hold an election.for _ new officers_ 5 1".011 tile . (Section 25 -21 and Section 25 -22 (below) remain unchanged.) Sec. 25-21. Vacancies. (a) Any of the following may cause the office of a planning commissioner to become vacated: (1) Death, or removal from the city. (2) Disability or failure to serve, as shown by failure to attend four (4) meetings in any year, may be cause for removal by council majority, unless good cause can be shown to the council. (3) Resignation in writing. (4) Taking of public office in the city. (b) Vacancies shall be filled by the council for the unexpired portion of the vacated term. Seca 25 -22. Officers; meetings; rules of procedures public attendance. (a) The planning commission shall elect its own officers, establish meeting times, and adopt its Own rules of procedure to be reviewed and approved by the city council. (b) All meetings of the planning commission shall be open to the public. 3 Section 5. This section changes Section 25 -23 as follows: Soo. 25 -23. Duties and responsibilities. The duties of the planning commission shall be as .follows: (1) To prepare and recommend a comprehensive plan of development for the city; (2) To conduct hearings and make recommendations to the city council a o t nrarr - fio the adoption of the city comprehensive plan and any amendments thereto. The comprehensive plan certified and adopted by the city council shall be recognized as the city official comprehensive plan.. ; (3) To study and make recommendations to the city council IV implementing the comprehensive plan and any land use regulations_. , (4) To study and make recommendations to the city council about Zoning a code amendments. in (5) To review, prepare and make a report to the city council by the second city council meeting in February of each year regarding the commission's activities in the past year and major projects for the new year. (6) To maintain a liaison and coordination with government and private agencies so that the city council may be familiar with -of the planning activities of such agencies in order to establish an order of :planning and development unity for the city (7) To review and recommend on or before June 30 ' , of each year a capital improvements program to the city council, which is designed to accomplish the comprehensive plan for the city.cf (8) To review and make recommendations to the city council on development applications, such as rezonings, conditional use permits, variances, vacations, preliminary plats and home occupation licenses_, (9) To accept such other and further duties as may, from time to time, be directed by the city council, including conducting hearings. (Section 25 -24 (below) remains unchanged.) Sec. 25 -24. compensation; expenses. All members of the planning commission shall serve without compensation. However, approved expenses of the planning commission shall be paid from available city funds. 4 Sect -on 6. This section changes Section 25 -25 as follows: Sec. 25-25. Citv staff ' 9 111111utwa I VVI01 wa Olive luton Subject to the direction of the city Manager, the planning commission and its chairperson %01 M ° the comrnunit,eveiopment director shall: ° IM Conduct all ggCLeesno dente ,of the commission. Ub Send out all required notices. Uc i�■�wr■w■w._�i www�w.rui�� *��www. Attend all meetings and h earings of the c.,_., mmission. Ud K ee* the d kets and minutes of -the com i sio p roceedings. (M Kee all re, gui ed records and files, .rr... .�. iii■ Maint in the files and indexes of the commission. P• • • P• • • • • P• • • • • - • • • • • ! I4PMqMPMW 40F v • • •�• • J I PON A- 9 •• s • III I I I I I t e • L- AM"' • NJ I M in - 1 - 1 9 I I I ! •-• • • • 111-i a s I I L a I I r:; 112 1 V 111041 L-M I v • I I ! • Section 7. This section changes Section 25 -26 as follows: Sec, 25 -26. Same - City engineer; city attorney; city inspectors; other city employees. (a) The %Q0 %11 L city engineer and the city attorney and their se,rvices shall be available to the planning commission. The said engineer and attorney shall have the right to sit in with the commission at all meetings, but shall not be entitled to vote as a member of said commission. (b) All city .inspectors and other regular employees or personnel of the city shall cooperate with the achvisrny commission, make themselves available and attend meetings, when requested to do so. Section 8. This ordinance shall take effect after the city council approves it and afte the official newspaper publishes it. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 11996. i 21 E •• Vi Planning Commission 2 - - i nutes of 11 -04 -96 B. Planning Commission Code Change Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioners Rossbach, Brueggeman and Pears. on said they preferred nine members on the commission. Commissioner Pearson had no objection. to eleven members. However, if the city council was inclined to downsize the planning commission, he preferred nine members to seven. Acting Chairperson Fischer said she would prefer to have eleven members because of the development still available in Maplewood.. The extra body could possibly provide more expertise, and continuity, than the smaller body. Commissioner Kittridge moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the ordinance which changes the size of the planning commission and updates the code language about the planning commission. Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes — Brueggeman, Frost, Kittridge, Pearson, Rossbach Nays— Fischer The motion passed. Commissioner Fischer said she voted against the motion only because- she preferred 11 members on the planning commission. Few y Action by Council: Endor , � MEMORANDUM Modifie Rejected. TO: City Manager Date FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Community Development Department Service Charges and Fees DATE: November 27, 1996 INTRODUCTION The service charges and planning fees for the community development department should be revised. BACKGROUND On November 25, 1996, the council gave the attached revisions to the service fees and the attached. ordinance raising planning fees first reading. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Approve the service charges for 1997 for the comm unity development department as outlined in Exhibit A starting on page 3. 2. Adopt the ordinance on page 6 setting the planning fees for 1997. kr /pmisc /servfees.mem Attachment: November 18, 1996 agenda report AGENDA NO, AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director and Community Development Director RE: INCREASE IN CONIMUNffY DEVELOPNWM DEPARTMENT SERVICE CHARGES DATE: November 18, 1996 INTRODUCTION It is proposed that the Community Development Department service charges be revised effective January 1, 1997. BACKGROUND It has been past practice to raise service charges annually to kip up with inflation. In 1993 a User. Fee Study was completed for the Community Development Department to insure that service charges finance an appropriate portion of the service costs. The User Fee Study report contained recommendations on 50 individual license /permit fees and service charges for the Community Development Department. For each item, it had information on the unit volume, current fee, costs to provide the service, recommended fee, phase -in schedule covering five years for the recommended fee, estimated increased revenue from the recommended fee and subsidy amount after the recommended fee is phased in. On 5- 24 -93, the Council approved the recommended fees for 1993 and made the increases effective July 1 1993. These fees remained in effect until January 1, 1995, when they were increased again. The recommended fees for 1996 were approved on 11- 13 -95. At this time, it would be appropriate to continue with the fee increases recommended in the User Fee Study. This is the fourth year of the phase -in schedule which covers most plaiuing fees and. some health inspection fees. Also, it would be appropriate to increase all other Community Development D — ent fees by 3 % to keep up with inflation. It should be noted that the recommended fees in the User Fee Study will produce . additional revenues of $212,000 over five years. The cost of the User Fee Study was $9,500. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council (1) approve revisions in Community Development Department license/permit fees and services charges listed in Exhibit A effective January 1, 1997 and (2) approve first reading of an ordinance (Exhibit B) to increase the planning fees. P:IFI *XMWPIAGMUSMFEE.CD 2 Nmember 18.1996 Exhibit A Page 1 of 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SERVICE CHARGES �ua� 1 -1 -95 1 -1 -96 1 -1 -97 Volume Fee Fee Fee PLANNING FEES (Set by Ordinance): Zone Change 1 $410* X492* X591* Conditional Use Permit: RI and RZ 1 188* 194* 200 Other 11 404* 514* 623* Condiitional Use Permit Revision: R1 and R2 1 38* 39* 40* Other 2 93* 111* 129* Variances: Rl and R2 7 82* 98* 118* Other 5 352* 486* 619* Vacations: RI and R2 10 $6* 104* 126* Other 2 238* 327* 416* Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created): RI and R2 11 58 67 69 Other 1 131 177 222 Home Occupations: Initial 2 92 111 131 Renewal S 46 48 49 Sign Erection Permit 100 19 20 21 Billboard Erection Permit 1 75 77 79 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 3 573* 716* 860* Code Amendment 1 352 486 619 Planned Unit Development 1 648* 803* 957* Preliminary Plat 7 700 881 1061 Preliminary Plat Revision or Time 9 . 113 140 168 Extension Final Plat 5 169 226 282 Time '=tensions/Renewals 9 113 116 119 Plus a surcharge for each affected property to pay for the County's filing fee for resolutions K, Exhibit A Page 2 of 3 COSY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SERVICE CHARGES Annual 1 -1 =95 1 -1 -96 1 -1 -97 Volume Fee Fee Fee Billboard License 1 289 298 307 LICENSES DUE JANUARY ST Motels: 1 -15 Units 1 87 90 93 16 - 35 Units 2 118 122 .126 36 -100 Units 1 209 225 232 Over 100 Units 2 250 258 266 Special Food Handling Establi shatent 35 72 74 76 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGE Woodlot Alteration Pernnit 1 12 13 13 Building Relocation 5 375 490 605 Moving Permit 3 43 44 45 Community Design Review Board: R1 & R2 2 151 156 161 Other 16 311, 410 508 Demolition Permit 1 50 52 54 Mobile Home Permit 1 32 33 34 On -Site Sewage Systems 6 33 41 50 PUBLICATIONS (Includes Sales Tax): Zoning Code 5 5 5 Platting Code 2 2 2 Sign Code 2 2 2 Comprehensive Plan 12 13 13 Zoning Map 2 2 2 City Map 2 2 2 Section Map 2 2 2 Exhibit A Page 3 of 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SERVICE CHARGES Es ual� 1 -1 -95 1 -1 =96 1 -1 -97 Volume Fee Fee Fee Planning Commission or Community Design Review Board: Minutes.- Per Year 14 14 14 Agenda Packet -Per Year 91 94 97 Property Owner List 52 54 56 5 Exhibit 6 ORDINANCE N0. PLANNING FEES Section 1. Section 36 -26 of the Zoning Code of the City of Maplewood is hereby amended as follows Section 36 -26. Fees. The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required: . Zone Change $591 Conditional Use Permit: 6.19 R1 & R2 200 -Other 623 Conditional Use Permit Revision: 168 R1 and R2 40 Other 129 Variances: R1 and R2 118 Other 619 Vacations: R1 and R2 126 Other 416 , Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created): R1 and R2 69 Other 222 Home Occupation Permit 131 (initial permit) 49 (annual renewal) Comprehensive Plan Amendment 81.6 Code Amendment 6.19 Planned Unit Development 957 Preliminary Plat 1061 Preliminary Plat Revision or Time Extension 168 Final Plat 282 Time Extensions /Renewals 119 .Section 2. Section 36 -258 of the sign code is amended as follows: Section 36 -258. Fees. (1) A sign erection permit fee (except for billboards) shall be $21. (2) The fee for erection of billboards shall be $79. (3) The annual license I fee for billboards shall be $307. Section 3. This ordinance shall be take effect on January 1, 19970 Passed by the Maplewood City Council on Mayor Attest: Clerk Ayes- - Nayes-- 6 AGENDA ITEM *7 AGENDA REPORT TO: Michael A. McGuire, City M nag . FROM: Joel Hewitt, Fire Chief RE: FIRE DEPARTMENT ORDINANCE DATE: October 1996 Action by Council: Endorsed Modifier ReJ ected,.�., Da.t e INTRODUCTION In reviewing the City Code with the City Attorney referencing fire protection, it revealed the necessity for an addition to the Code. for the establishment of a municipal operated fire department and to change the Code referencing the duties and powers of the fire marshal that currently .reflects the duties and power of the fire chief. DISCUSSION The following is an ordinance establishing the municipal fire department as reviewed by the City Attorney. This ordinance would occupy Article III, Code Sections 12 -74 through Sections 12- 78. FIRE PROTECTION The City Council hereby ordains and resolves Sec. 12 -74. Fire_ Department Established. There is continued a fire department consisting of a fire chief, fire office, and such number of full -time, part -time and volunteer firefighters as the City may employ. S ec. 12 -7. Purpose. The fire department shall be responsible for fire prevention, enforcement of the building code and fire code, fire suppression, delivery of emergency medical services, emergency actions for protection from release of toxic and dangerous or hazardous materials, and such other duties as are prescribed by the manager. Sec* 12-76, Fire Chief. The fire department shall be under the direction of the fire chief. The fire chief shall report to the manager. See. 12-77. Volunteer Firefighters. ' e may establish 'a volunteer gram hter ro. and may adopt standards for The fire chief y g p the employment ent of volunteer firefighters, subject to the approval of the manager. p Sec. 12-78. Training and Drills. The fire chief shall establish performance. standards for the personnel of the fire depart p g department and shall provide training and drills to meet said performance standards. The following are changes required in the code to reflect the duties and power of the fire chief and fire marshal due to the addition of the fire chief position within the City: Sec. 12 -73 (2) Eliminate as this becomes the responsibility of the fire chief: To provide direction, guidance, advice, and coordination of all volunteer fire departments located in the City and furnishing fire protection to properties within the City pursuant to contract with the City. Sec. 12 -73 (3) Change: To arrange with such fire departments all necessary procedures for periodic and regular inspection of public and private premises for fire prevention and safety. To Read: necessary procedures for periodic. and inspection of public and re To. establish all n ry p p g private premises for fire prevention and safety. Sec. 12 -73 (41 Eliminate as this is the responsibility of the fire chief and the City is being provided fire service from the municipal department: To assist such volunteer fire departments in all matters pertaining to internal organization, training, reciprocity of assistance, State department rules, State retirement contributions, underwriters regulations and all other matters pertaining to fire departments and to enforce the City fire code. Sec. 12 -73 (5) Ch ange: To plan for improvements and upgrading of fire protection within the City, to the ends that greater efficiency will be achieved in fire prevention, firefighting, and - insurance premium benefits; and to present all such plans and proposals to the City Council for implementation and activation. To Read: To assist the fire chief in developing improvements and upgrading of fire protection within the City, to the ends that greater efficiency and effectiveness will be achieved in fire prevention, firefighting, and insurance premium benefits; and to present all such plans and proposals to the fire chief for implementation. With the adoption of this new ordinance and changes in the correct ordinance, this will reflect the city's fire service operation as of January 1, 1997. RECOMMENDATION r To approve and accept the adoption of an ordinance establishing the City fire department to the Maplewood City Code, Article III, Sections 12 -74 through 12 -78. Additionally, to approve and accept the changes regarding the fire chief s and fire marshal's duties and powers within the Maplewood City Code Article III, Section 12 -73 (2) through 12 -73 (S). c: City Clerk AGENDA NO. �4 E ndorsed. Moditi �d AGENDA REPORT Rejecte d�„�,�, Date�� TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT FALSE ALARM BILLS DATE: December 2,1996 The alarm ordinance adopted by the Council on 8 -28 -95 includes a provision that unpaid false alarm charges shall be certified as special assessments. On 10 -28 -96 letters were sent to everyone advising them that their unpaid invoice(s) for false alarm charges would be added to their 1997 property taxes if payment was not made by 11- 30 -96. Most of the invoices were paid. It is recommended that the attached resolution be approved to certify the remaining unpaid false alarm charges for collection with property taxes payable in 1997. 1 PARNANCEMPIAGNTALSEAL MD RESOLUTION RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the following delinquent false alarm charges for certification against the tax levy of said property owners for the year 1996, collectible in 1997 and which includes interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) on the total amount for one year: ACCOUNT STREET ADDRESS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION AMOUNT All Tune & Lube 2525 White Bear Avenue 11- 29 -22 -22 -0027 $27.00 Circuit City 1940 E. County Road D 02- 29 -22 -22 -0001 $108.00 Home Depot 2360 White Bear Avenue 11- 29 -22 -31 -0056 $216.00 Taco Bell 1965 E. County Road D 35- 30 -22 -34 -001 $43.00 TOTAL $394.00 PA INANCEMMAGNTALSEAL.WPD AGENDA NO. JF' AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager Action by Council: Endorsed ,...,.... �.,. . Modif i erl Rejected Craig W. Dawson, Assistant City Manager Date Suburban Rate Authority, Amendments to Joint and Cooperative Agreement December 9, 1996 INTRODUCTION With the creation of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission in 1975, many cities "reconstituted" the Suburban Rate Authority (SRA) through a joint and cooperative agreement. At that time, the SBA's focus was on rates for electricity and natural gas. Since that time, there have been no amendments to the Agreement to reflect the significant change in the SBA's intervention authority (now into telecommunications and sewage treatment), nor the changes in government agencies (e.g., the MWCC, now the MCES). At is Fall 1996 quarterly meeting, the Suburban Rate Authority recommended that its member cities approve an amended joint and cooperative agreement. MAJOR PROVISIONS The amendments include the following major changes: Specifically expands the scope of the SBA's activity. It would now encompass gas and electric utilities, telecommunications, and sewage disposal. Establishes a temporary membership classification. Allows the Board, on behalf of the SRA or of governmental units, to enter into contracts for purchase and delivery of utility products. This provision would let the SRA Board conduct negotiations for governments who request it to do so. This new provision is inserted in anticipation of "retail wheeling" of utility services -- particularly electricity and gas. (Under a strict reading of the current agreement, the SRA Board and staff would not be allowed even to discuss such matters with utility providers.) The amendments also include numerous minor changes to update and simplify language, and to reflect current practices in the way the SRA conducts its business. The basis to determine voting rights - -a federal decennial census - -is also clarified. Maplewood currently has seven votes; with the population formula among current members, there are 162 votes in the SRA. Maplewood's membership in the SRA is $2,800 annually. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council approve and authorize execution of the amended joint and cooperative agreement for the Suburban Rate Authority. SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY ISSUES GAS RATES GAS FRANCHISES i ELECTRIC RATES ELECTRIC FRANCHISES i CITY SRA -� TELECOMWRATES i i TELECOM FRANCHISES i I ROW ORDINANCES i i WIRELESS TELECOM i ZONING WIRELESS TELECOM LEASES SEWAGE DISPOSAL ISSUES SRA & RATE PROCEEDINGS petition for rate change i I UTILITIES regulates i ! i -GAS - ELECTRIC - TELECOMM i requires proceedings PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (5 PERSON COMMISSION) recommends IF i ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE i ; presides over hearing INTERVENORS i i i ! j( CITY i CITY CITY RESIDENTIAL UTILITIES DIVISION ATTORNEY GENERAL RATE PROCEEDINGS j OTHER i PARTIES I OF PUBLIC SERVICE f AMENDED JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT I. PARTIES The parties to this agreement are governmental units of the State of Minnesota. This agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 471.59, as amended. II. GENERAL PURPOSE The general purpose of this agreement is to establish and continue an organization to monitor the operation and activities of public utilities in the metropolitan area; to conduct research and investigation of the activities of such utilities; and to conduct such other activities authorized herein as may be necessary to insure equitable and reasonable public utility rates and service levels for the citizens of the members of the organization and for the members themselves. III. NAME The name of the organization is the SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY. The name may be changed in accordance with Article XII. IV. DEFINITIONS Section 1. For purposes of this agreement, the terms defined in this article have the meaning given them. Section 2. "Authority" means the joint and cooperative organization created by this agreement. Section 3. "Board" or "Board of Directors" means the Board of Directors of the Authority established by Article VI. -Section 4. "Council" means the governing body of a governmental unit. Section 5. "Governmental unit" means a city or town in the metropolitan area. DJK109900 1 SU1,60 -3 Section 6. "Metropolitan area" means the metropolitan area defined and described by Minnesota Statutes, chapter 473, as amended. Section 7. "Member' means a governmental unit which has entered into and become a party to this agreement. Section 8. "Public utility" or "utility" means an investor -owned utility supplying telecommunication services to member residents or gas or electricity under franchise within one or more governmental units; the term may include other utilities as provided in Article XII. The term does not include municipally owned utilities; the term does include a governmental agency supplying sanitary sewer or other utility services to governmental units in the metropolitan area. Section 9. "Statutory cities" means cities organized under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 412. V. MEMBERSHIP Section 1. Any governmental unit in the metropolitan area is eligible to be a member of the Authority. Section 2. A governmental unit desiring to become a member must execute a copy of this agreement and conform to the membership provisions of this Article V. Section 3. A governmental unit wishing to become a member after the effective date of this agreement may be admitted only upon the favorable vote of two- thirds of the votes of the members of the Board of Directors present and voting at any regular or special meeting. The Board may, in its by -laws, impose conditions upon the admission of additional members. Section 4. The Board may, in its by -laws, establish procedures for temporary membership for governmental units for specified periods of time not exceeding one year with or without the payment of contributions or with the payment of reduced contributions as determined under Article X. If such memberships are authorized, the cumulative votes of all temporary members may not exceed 25% of the total votes of the directors of permanent members. DJK109900 SU160 -3 2 . Section 5. A change in the governmental boundaries, structure, classification or organization of a governmental unit does not affect the eligibility of a unit to become or remain a member of the Authority. VI. GOVERNING BODY: BOARD OF DIRECTORS Section 1. The governing body of the Authority is its Board of Directors. Each member is.entitled to one director on the Board. Each director is entitled to one vote for each 5,000 of population or fraction thereof, as determined by the official U.S. Census each decade, of the governmental unit represented by the director; provided, however, that each director must have at least one vote and no director may have more than 20 votes. Prior to December 31 of each year following the decennial census, the Secretary- Treasurer of the Authority must determine the population of each member in accordance with this section and certify the results to the chairman. Section 2. A director is appointed by resolution of the council of the members for a term . of one calendar year. A director serves until a successor is appointed and qualifies. Directors serve without compensation from the Authority, but nothing in this section is to be construed to prevent a governmental unit from compensating its director for service on the Board if such compensation is otherwise authorized by law. Section 3. The Board, in its by- laws, may provide for the appointment of alternate directors and prescribe the extent of their powers and duties. Section 4. Vacancies in the office of director will exist for any of the reasons set forth in Minnesota Statutes, section 351.02, or upon a revocation of a director's appointment by a member duly filed with the Authority. Vacancies are filled by appointment for the unexpired portion of the term of director by the council of the member whose position on the Board is vacant. Section 5. A majority of the votes of the Board of Directors constitutes a quorum, but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time. The votes of temporary members authorized by DJK109900 SU160 -3 3 Article V, Section 4 are not to be considered in determining the presence or absence of a quorum of the Board. VII. MEETINGS: ELECTION OF OFFICERS Section 1. A governmental unit may enter into this agreement by resolution of its council and the duly authorized execution of a copy of this agreement by its proper officers. Thereupon, the clerk or other appropriate officer of the governmental unit must file an executed copy of the agreement and a certified copy of the authorizing resolution with the finance director of the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota. The resolution authorizing the execution of the agreement must also designate the first director for the governmental unit on the Board. Section 2. This agreement is effective on the date when executed agreements and authorizing resolutions of the governmental units presently members of the existing Suburban Rate Authority have been filed as provided in Section 1 of this Article. Section 3. Within 30 days after the effective date of this agreement, the mayor of the member having the largest population must call the first meeting of the Board of Directors which must be held no later than the date of the next regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Authority. Section 4. The first meeting of the Board will be the organizational meeting of the Authority. At the organizational meeting, and at each annual meeting thereafter, the Board must select from among the directors a chairman, a vice - chairman, and a secretary- treasurer. Section 5. At the organizational meeting, or as soon thereafter as it may reasonably be done, the Board must adopt by -laws governing its procedures, including the time, place, notice for and frequency of its regular meetings, procedure for calling special meetings, and such other matters as are required by this agreement. The Board may amend the by -laws from time to time. The Board must meet at least once each year and on such other dates as may be provided in its DJK109900 4 SU160 -3 by -laws. The annual meeting is held in the month of January unless otherwise provided in the by -laws. VIII. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Section 1. The powers and duties of the Board of Directors of the Authority are set forth in this article. Section 2. The Board may make such contracts and enter into such agreements as it deems necessary to make effective any power granted to the Authority by this agreement. It may contract with any of its member governmental units or others to provide space, services or materials on behalf of the Authority. Section 3. The Board may provide for the prosecution, defense, or other participation in actions or proceedings at law in which it may have an interest, and may employ counsel for that purpose. It may employ such other persons as it deems necessary to accomplish its powers and duties. Such employees may be on a full -time or part -time, or consulting basis as the Board determines, and the Board may make any required employer contributions that local government units are authorized or required to make by law. Section 4. The Board may conduct such research and investigation and take such action as it deems necessary, including participation and appearance. in proceedings of state and federal regulatory, legislative or administrative bodies, on any matter related to or affecting utility costs, levels of service, rates or franchises, and advise members concerning such matters with a view toward obtaining compliance with franchises granted to utilities and insuring reasonable rates and service levels for the members and their residents. The Board may conduct the activities authorized by this section on behalf of any governmental unit located outside the metropolitan area at the request of such a unit, embodied in a resolution of its governing body; provided however, that the conduct of such activities on behalf of any such governmental unit must be DJK109900 SU160 -3 5 specifically authorized by the Board and shall be subject to such reasonable conditions as to cost of service and other matters as may be imposed by the Board. Section 5. The Board may obtain from any utility and from any other source such information relating to utility rates, costs and service levels as any of its members is entitled to obtain from such utilities. Section 6. The Board may receive and hold moneys from any utility to the extent and in the manner as may be provided by this agreement or any franchise granted to a utility by a member; and it may accept voluntary contributions from its members or other .sources as provided in Article X. The Authority has no taxing power. It may accumulate reserve funds - and may invest and re- invest its funds not needed for current expenses in the manner and subject to the limitations applicable by law to statutory cities. The Board may not incur obligations in excess of funds then available to the Authority. Section 7. The Board must make a financial accounting and report to the members at least once each year. The books and records of the Authority will be open and available for inspection by members at all reasonable times. Section 8. The Board may accept gifts, apply for and use grants of money or other property from members or other governmental units or organizations, and may enter into agreements required in connection therewith, and may hold, use, and dispose of such moneys or property in accordance with the terms of the grant, gift or agreement relating thereto. Section 9. The Board must establish the annual budget for the Authority as provided in Article X. Section 10. The Board may, in its by -laws, establish an executive committee and may delegate duties and authority to the executive committee between Board meetings. DJK109900 SU160 -3 6 Section 11. The Board may purchase public liability insurance and such other security bonds and insurance as it may deem necessary. Section 12. The Board may, on behalf of the Authority or on behalf of a number of member governmental units or nonmember governmental units, or both, enter into contracts, at the request of such units, with public utilities within or without the state for the purchase and delivery of utility products and services for those governmental units. Section 13, The Board may exercise any other power necessary and convenient to the implementation of the powers and duties given to it by this agreement. IX. OFFICERS Section 1. The officers of the Board are a chair, a vice - chair, and a secretary- treasurer elected by the Board for a term of one year and until their respective successors are elected and qualify, at the annual meeting. New officers take office at the adjournment of the annual meeting at which they were elected. An officer must be a duly qualified and appointed director. A director from a temporary member may not be an officer. Section 2. A vacancy in the office of chair, vice- chair, or secretary- treasurer occurs for any of the reasons for which a vacancy in the office of director occurs. Vacancies in these offices and filled by the Board for the unexpired portion of the term. Section 3. The chair presides at .meetings of the Board. The vice -chair acts as chairman in the absence, disqualification or disability of the chairman. Section 4. The secretary- treasurer is responsible for keeping a record of the proceedings of the Board, for custody of funds, for keeping of financial. records of the Authority and for such other duties as may be assigned to the Secretary - Treasurer by the Board. Persons may be employed to perform such services under the supervision and direction of the secretary- treasurer as may be authorized by the Board. The secretary - treasurer must post a fidelity bond or other DJK109900 SU160 -3 7 insurance against loss of Authority funds in the account specified by the Board. The cost of such bond or insurance to, be paid by the Board. The Board may provide for compensation of the secretary- treasurer for services to the Board. X. FINANCIAL MATTERS Section 1. The fiscal year of the Authority is the calendar year. Section 2. Authority funds may be expended in accordance with the procedures established by law for statutory cities. Orders, checks and drafts must be signed by the chairman and countersigned by the secretary - treasurer or such other person as may be designated by the Board in its by -laws. Other legal instruments must be executed on behalf of the Authority by the chairman and the secretary- treasurer. Contracts must be let and purchases made in accordance with the procedures established by law for statutory cities. Section 3. The activities of the Authority may be financed by funds available to it under Article VIII, from voluntary contributions from its members or from other sources, and by contributions from members of the Authority if it is determined by the Board by atwo- thirds vote, by written action or at a regular or special meeting, of all votes of then existing members, that such contributions are necessary. This determination must be made by the Board not later than August 1 of each year in order to obligate members to make contributions during the ensuing calendar year. The total annual contribution by members for the ensuing year is established by the Board on the basis of anticipated expenditures and only if the anticipated expenditures are in excess of the anticipated funds otherwise available to the Authority. The contribution in any year by a member must be in direct proportion to the number of votes to which the director representing the member on the Board is entitled. Contributions must be made by the member to the Authority as follows: one -half on or before April 1 of each year and one -half on or before September 1 of each year. DJK109900 SU160 -3 8 Section 4. An annual budget must be adopted by the Board at the regular meeting in July of each year. If a quorum is not present at the regular meeting in July, the budget may be .adopted b unanimous vote of the executive committee. Copies of the budget must be mailed p y promptly to the chief administrative office of each member. The budget is deemed approved by the members except one who, at any time prior to the annual meeting gives notice in writing to the secretary - treasurer that it is withdrawing from the Authority. XI. DURATION AND DISSOLUTION Section 1. The Authority will exist, and this agreement is in effect, for an indefinite term until dissolved in accordance with Section 3 of this article. Section 2. A member may withdraw from the Authority by filing a written notice with the secretary- treasurer by June 15 of any year giving notice of withdrawal at the end of that calendar year; and membership - shall continue until the effective date of the withdrawal. A notice of withdrawal may be rescinded at any time by a member. If a member withdraws before dissolution of the Authority, the member will have no claim on the assets of the Authority. Section 3. The Authority must be dissolved whenever the withdrawal of a member reduces total membership in the Authority to less than seven. The Authority may be dissolved at any time by unanimous vote of all the members of the Board of Directors. Section 4. In the event of dissolution, the Board must determine the measures necessary to effect the dissolution and provide for the taking of such measures as promptly as circumstances permit, subject to the provisions of this agreement. Upon dissolution of the Authority all remaining assets of the Authority, after payment of obligations, must be distributed among the then existing members in proportion to the number of their votes on the Board and in accordance with procedures established by the Board. The Authority will continue to exist after dissolution DJK109900 [1 SU1.60 -3 7 for the period, no longer than six months, necessary to wind up its affairs but for no other purpose. xII. TRANSITIONAL AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS Section 1. The activities of the Authority are to be coned to telecommunications, sewage disposal, gas and electric utilities, provided however, that the Authority may extend and broaden its activities to any other public utility as defined in this agreement by a 75% majority vote of all the votes of the Board of Directors, taken at a regular meeting of the Board. In the event the activities of the Authority are so extended and broadened, the Authority and its Board of Directors have all of the powers and duties with reference to any other public utility that they have with reference to gas, telecommunications, sewage disposal and electric utilities under this agreement. Section 2. The name of the organization created by this agreement may be changed when deemed appropriate by the Board, but only upon a 75% majority vote of all the votes of the Board of Directors taken at a regular meeting of the Board or by written action. If the name of the organization is so changed, the Board must provide in its by-laws for necessary measures to effect the change in official and unofficial documents, papers, and other essential respects. Section 3. It is the intention of the parties to this agreement that the organization created hereby is the successor to the Suburban Rate Authority in existence on the day prior to the effective date of this agreement. It is further the intention of the parties that any funds made available to the organization created by this agreement from assets of the prior Suburban Rate Authority must be used exclusively for the purposes of this agreement. The adopted budget of the prior Suburban Rate Authority remains in effect until revised and until the new annual budget is adopted. The adoption of this agreement does not affect or modify the obligation of members WK109900 SU160 -3 10 of the prior Suburban Rate Authority to make contributions authorized by the prior Suburban Rate Authority. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental unit has caused this agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers and delivered on its behalf. Minnesota (Governmental unit) By Its Mayor By Its Dated: , 199 Manager Filed in the office of the finance director of the City of Columbia Heights this day of , 199 DJK109900 SU160 -3 11 AGENDA NO. I? AGENDA REPORT Aotion by Council Endorse TO: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager Medifi e,.,�..,�.. Rejecte ........,.....w FROM: Craig W. Dawson, Assistant City Manager Date RE: Police and Fire Service Contracts with City of Landfall DATE: December 9, 1996 INTRODUCTION The City of Maplewood provides police services to the City of Landfall on a contract basis. The East County Line Fire Department has been providing fire services to Landfall under a contract. The City of Maplewood is succeeding East County Line to provide fire services to Landfall, and a new contract will need to be in place by the end of this year. POLICE CONTRACT Maplewood has had several three -year contracts with Landfall that have been renewed annually. The current contract, which is in effect for 1996 -1998, calls for police and animal control services but not paramedic services. The first -year (1996) cost for services is $88,024. Costs for subsequent years are to be based on a consumer index used by Maplewood's finance department. It is proposed to renew the three -year service agreement to run from 1997 -1999, with a 3.0 percent increase in the first -year cost for service. The contract payment would be $90,665 for 1997. Anew article would be added to the agreement so that Maplewood would not be obligated to continue services (without further compensation) for the use of equipment when grant funding expires. FIRE CONTRACT Landfall has had an annual service contract with East County Line. The 1996 contract amount was $22,000 ($2,000 of which was earmarked for the Maplewood Firefighters Relief Association). The City Attorney has drafted an agreement for 1997 that would be essentially identical to the current Landfall /ECL contract. Updated language would change the service provider from "East County Line" to "Maplewood ", increase the contract amount to $22,660, and include the usual protections for the City that exist in other City contracts. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the execution of agreements for police and fire services with the City of Landfall. Copies of the agreements are available in the City Manager's Office. AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT Action by, Council ' Endorsed ,,.�...� TO: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager Modif i e . , ,-. .� Re j ecte FROM: Craig W. Dawson, Assistant City Manager Dat �-- �- ��-aw- RE: 1997 Contract with Oakdale for Fire Services DATE: December 9, 1996 INTRODUCTION The East County Line Fire Department has been providing fire protection services to a portion of the Cit y of Oakdale on a contract basis. The current contract expires at the end of this year. The City of Maplewood will succeed East County Line in providing these services to Oakdale. CONTRACT REVISIONS The revised contract would retain the same format as the current East County Line/Oakdale or ) agreement. The majority of revisions are related to changing the service provider from East g Y County Line the City of Maplewood In 1996,Oakdale is paying $161,314: $139,041 for fire, rescue, and ambulance services; and a contribution of $22,373 to the Maplewood Firefighters Relief Association. In 1997, Oakdale would pay $193,576 - -a 20 percent increase over 1996. The agreement would be for all of calendar year 1997. Oakdale is contemplating an expansion of the Oakdale Fire Department in order to provide service to the area served by East County Line/Maplewood. Any changes to the agreement resulting from actions would be dealt with as contract amendments during 1997 or in an agreement for services in 1998. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council approve and authorize execution of the agreement for fire protection services with the City of Oaakdale in 1997 A copy of the agreement is available in the City Manager's Office. s Acty_mgr\oAdfagr. aga Michael E. O'Connor has applied for an intoxicating liquor license for 3069 N. White Bear Avenue (Chi - Chi's). Background An extensive background investigation has been done on Mr. O'Connor. He has g g no.-known contacts with the police, -and we cannot find any evidence that he holds a liquor license in any. other establishment'in the State of Minnesota. Recommendation After conductin g a thorough background investigation on this individual, I do not find any reason to deny his application for an intoxicating liquor license. Action Required Application for intoxicating liquor license to be submitted to the City ..Council for their review and approval or denial. MPR:js cc City Clerk Liquor File 96- 019457 1009 ITY OF MAPLEWOOD �APPLtCATION FOR INTOXICATING L THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE. Please do not use initials. Whoever- knowingly and willfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be deemed guilty of perjury and s - hall be punished accordingly. In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows. For a Cor P oration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders For a partnership, one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED I. 2. 0 qgs 9Gy i 9�to I Eduzwd� i�G� t �i U for and in behalf of ,.T (individual owner, officer or partner) 1 r hereby apply for an Off_ On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at (give address & legal description'): ,3o(oc1.__LJh, r 11 L ' i in the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 95 of Maplewood. Give applicants' dates of birth: Name Month Day Year t .09 Z!2&3 P rtsen � H G r- U f 1 S f'h 5 i 1 qqS as -t�� I Ck s v rr� 3 ��� ©�l �S t �'�. �e � (�(1 5511 4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States? Qe If naturalized, state date and place of naturalization: If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship, including naturalization of each officer or artner: >" p The residence for each of the applicants named' herein for the past five years is as follows: 50 The erson who executes this application shall give, wife's. or husband's full name and P , address C 6. What occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past five years? Res+ au m n + �)on ckc->_(Yieni 7. If partnership, state name and address of each partner If a corporation, date of incorporation -7.._- J j - g(o , .state in which incorporated Yom. amount of authorized capital .i zati on : co amount of paid in capital NIA If a s ubs i d i ary of any other corporation, so state T: g ive p urpose of corporation oration - T A 9 P P P 't Name and address of all officers, directors a d stockholders and the number of shares held by each: Name Address City If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this State? S Number of certificate of authority If this appl i cat i.on is fora new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws. 8. an what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? 9. If operating under a zoning 'ordinance, how is the location of the b u i l d i n g classified? Is the bui lding located within the prescribed area for such. licenses? 10. Is the establishment located near an academy., college, university, church, grade or high school? State approximate distance of the establishment from such school or church 11. State name and address of owner of-building 1A Q n 9 0'uj��j ss �V IS+ 11 7 ; has owne of bu i 1 i ng any connect i on , directly or indirectly with applicant? 12. Are the taxes on the above property delinquent? N 13. State whether 'applicant or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an w application for a Liquor License rejected by any municipality or State authority; if so, 9 ve date and detai l s 140 ..Has the applicant, or. any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances, if so, give date and.details 15. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application., during that past five years were ever convicted of any Liquor Law violations or any crime in this state, or an y other state, or under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and details 16. Is applicant, or any of his associates in this application, a member of the governing body of the municipality in which this license is to be issued? If so, in what capacity? 17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures, or equipment in the premises for which license i s applied, and if so, give names and details 18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota? n Give name and address of such establishment 19. Furnish the names and addresses of at least three business references, including one W 21. Does applicant intend to sell intoxicating liquor to other than the consumer? 22. State whether applicant intends to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice, gambling device and apparatus, or permit any gambling therein tor u 23. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exlusive from any other business establishment? Do you possess a retail dealer's identification card issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner which will expire December 31st of this year ? Give number 1?,95 0., '. 240 State trade name to be used �',h I��� is rne x ",V?- 250 State name . of person that will operate store ���j�`� ItA rd oco ,��or 26, Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number � � q �P � � J "J� S a ' 0 0 0, 27. If off sale license is being applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor by vehicle? (�n_ If so, state number of motor vehicle permits issued by Liquor Control Commissioner for current year 28 If you are building a new building for the purposes for which this appl i cat i-on is being made, please submit plans and specifications with, this application. 290 Financing of the construction of this b u i l d i n g w i l l be as follows: 30. FurnishAa personal financial statement with this. application. If a partnership, furnish financial statement of each partner. 31. Give description of type of operation_if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cocktail lounge, nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity by number of f customers and any other pertinent data) D e;� 32. What previous experience have you had described in the answer to No. 31 above? `�� r � as _� (L ( I 1� C�_ Ics - I in the operation of the t of business . ri I Ir - I 33. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all q 9 ordinances of the municipality; and I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge. (Signature of Applicant) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3 i -/ � - day of 19 A ' RO ROBERTM. SILBERMAN NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA .�f My Co=w Ssion Expires San. 31, 2000 Y CHI. CHI'S, INC. (a Delaware corporation) 18831 Von Karman Avenue Irvine, CA 92715 1996 OFFICERS AS OF 6/17/96 ROGER R. CHAMNESS ROBERT D. GONDA Director /President Treasurer 99.05 Willowbrook Circle 11052 Wickford Drive Louisville, KY 40223 Santa Ana, CA 92705 (502) 254• -1620 Social Security No.: 115 -40 -1275 S/S #545 -74 -2104 Date of Birth. 4/02/52 Date of Birth: 3/30/53 Place of Birth: New York Place of Birth: Arizona Driver's License No.: C4305360 Stock Owned 0% Stock Owned 0% i ROBERT T. TREBING, JR. KEVIN S. RELYEA Director /Vice President Director 28682 Vista Ladera 17403 Tam -O- Shanter Drive Laguna. Niguel, CA 92677 Poway, CA 92064 Social Security No.: 551 -88 -1920 S/S #549 -02 -8312 Date of Birth: 12/18/49. Date of Birth: 1/23/55 Place of Birth: Illinois Place of Birth: New York Driver's License No.: R0837770 Stock Owned 0% Stock Owned 0% Driver's License No.: NO261634 MICHAEL E. MALANGA Vice President 47 Sea Terrace Newport Coast, CA 92657 S/S #545 -96 -0302 Date of Birth: 11/01/53 Place of Birth: Illinois Driver's License No, E0143634 Stock Owned 0% TODD E. DOYLE Secretary 14249 Mango Drive Del Mar, CA 92014 Social Security No.: 565 -84 -2048 Date of Birth: 11/28/61 Place of Birth: Florida Stock Owned 0% Driver's License No. V7043185 Page 1 of 2 LISA C . MANUEL Vice President 8512 Raintree Drive Louisville, KY 40220 (502) 499 -8090 S/S #463 -08 -8358 DOB 10/06/55 POB: Texas Driver's License No.: C0931591 Stock Owned 0% STEVEN Wo SPRECHER Assistant Secretary 25962 Ernestine Court Laguna Hills, CA 92653 S/S #341 -46 -3119 DOB: 04/05/55 POB: Illinois Driver's License No.: C3443482 Stock Owned 0% FRI -MRD Corporation Stockownership 100- 18831 Von Karman Avenue Irvine, CA 92715 LAURIE A KATAPSKI Vice President 9715 Grandin Woods Road Louisville, KY 40299 (502) 253 -9157 S/S #556 -17 -5522 DOB: 01/24/57 POB North Carolina Driver's License No.: N4156407 Stock Owned 0% Page 2 of 2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 APPLICATION FOR SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE ���A���� ��Oni� <�Y'� doing business at �, Oki S L under the business name. of hereb y PP make application ication for a license to sell liquor between the hours of 8.:00 A. M. and 1:00 A. M. on Sundays at the above A location. I hereby certify that meals are served, and will be served on Sundays, at this location, that there is table seating capacity for 30 or more persons at one time, and that I presently hold an on -sale liquor license, issued by the City of Maplewood. The seating capacity at this location is Z Z Z Date ID1 3a /4(� License Fee is X200.00 per year. License Year is January 1 through December 31 LICENSE FEE PAID RECEIPT NUMBER Signature of Applicant nP Address (ardt,n f+* HS fy)r) sslla LICENSE NUMBER RESTAURANTS Chi - Chi's, Inc. Mailing Address: P.O. Box 32338 Louisville, KY 40232 -2338 Shipping Address: 10200 Linn Station Road Louisville, KY 40223 502/426 -3900 1a -30 c 4 f (4 TO Who rv� k Ma� CO v�G , 'I C mchael Edward �'Conr�or have.. no t) 'e_ �n�e�esf o-f Call LOia- 483- 8'aic�. O'Connor F4wp // AGENDA REPORT Action. by Council. Endore e d ._r.r.mm.�.n+.r�. m TO: City Manager Modified Re j ecte rl�„��r,� ...�,.� FROM: Assistant City Engineer ineer uk-/� Date RE: Project 96 -11, Cope Avenue Bituminous Mill and Overlay Change Order No. 2 Final Acceptance and Payment DATE: December 2, 1996 have attached the final project payment request and the resolution for the acceptance of the project. The final construction cost for the project, including all change orders, is $216,260.26. State aid will cover 100% of these costs. The final cost is less than 5% over the original bid price for the project. Considerable changes were incorporated into the project though, so I will detail the relationship of the changes to the cost. The council initially accepted the low bid with the understanding that the polymer taped striping at $33,390.46 would be replaced by Ramsey County painted striping at $1,229.60. This was completed as the council had ordered. A significant amount of proposed work items' final quantities were substantially higher than the proposed quantities. Please see the attached Change Order No. 2 and resolution directing the modification of the existing construction contract. Change Order No. 2 details the items that were increased in quantity as well as the deletion of the bituminous patching and polymer tape striping. Mn /Dot has approved all of the quantity increases shown. The explanation of the recapitulation contingency request follows. Concrete curb and gutter on Cope Avenue were integral with driveway which caused there to be an over run of concrete driveway removal and replacement. Curb and gutter removal and replacement were decided in field to go to nearest joint and also an adjacent section was often replaced due to the piece causing blockage of drainage. Sod quantities were increased due to increased curb and gutter removals and a large area of boulevard where St. Paul Water Utility had made repairs on water main. This area accounted for half of the over run. Curb and gutter increased for extra driveway replacements. Additional sawing bituminous pavement at Kennard Street for placement of new curb and gutter at old street intersection. Increase of mixture for joints and cracks and joint and crack filler was decided in field to increase crack sealing and routing rather than use bituminous patch mixture as there were not very many large potholes, alligatored areas or larger cracks that needed to be repaired. One hundred foot sample sections were taken after initial estimating before cope Avenue project began. This showed a much clearer projected total. The bituminous patching mixture was considerably lower. The increase in the quantity of mixture of joints and cracks increased the bituminous material for tack coat quantity. The removal of bituminous pavement median was increased due to the 12" thickness of the vacated Kennard Street right of way. This was agreed by city inspector and contractor as it was well over 6" thickness and was in accordance with Specification 2104.5. The completed project meets the plan and specification requirements. The contractor completed the project according to staff direction and in a timely manner. Staff recommends that the city council approve Change Order No. 2 and accept the project as complete. Staff should be directed to release the final payment of $13,819.76 to the contractor and increase the budget by $40,000.00 CHANGE ORDER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Project Name: Cope Avenue Bituminous Mill & Overlay Change Order No.: 2 Project No.: 96 -11 Date: Dec. 9, 1996 Contractor: Ace Blacktop, Inc. The following changes shall be made in the contract documents: Total Est. Final Cost Description Unit Quant. Quant. Bid Difference Remove 8618 Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 153.00 280.00 $ 5.50 $ 698.50 Remove 8624 concrete curb & gutter LF 324.00 420.00 6.50 624.00 remove bituminous median /pavement SY 361.00 545.00 3.00 552.00 Remove concrete driveway /apron SY 36.50 139.00 10.00 1 Sawing bituminous pavement LF 37.00 175.00 3.00 414.00 Sodding, type salt resistant SY 216.00 750.00 13.00 6 Aggregate base, Class 6 T 21.00 70.34 15.00 740.10 Mixture for joints and cracks HW 163.00 779.00 35.00 21 Joint and crack filler LB 2 8 1.75 11 Bituminous material for tack coat GAL 1 2 1.15 1 Concrete curb & gutter, Design B618 LF 151.00 280.00. 15.00 1 Concrete curb & gutter, Design B624 LF 312.00 420.00 16.00 1 8 concrete driveway pavement SY 28.00 104.00 47.00 3572.00 Bituminous patching mixture T 385.00 28.01 35.00 (12,494.65) Pvmt. mess. (r.arrow &only)polymer preform. LF 2.00 0.00 85.00 (170.00) 4 "solid line white polymer preformed LF 560.00 0.00 2.50 (1 4 "solid yellow polymer preformed LF 12 0.00 2.50 (30,152.50) 4 "broken line white polymer preformed LF 5 0.00 0.28 (17667.96) Contract Status Original Contract: Net Change of Prior Change Order No.1 : Change This Change Order: Revised Contract: Approved Mayor Approved Engineer Agreed to by Contractor by Its Time Cost $206 $ 3 $ 7,297.34 $217,106.99 Title RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 96 -11, Cope Avenue Bituminous Mill and Overlay and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 96 -11 Change Order 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAP LEWOO D, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 2 in the amount of $7,297.34. The revised contract amount is $217,106.99. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. The project budget is increased by $40,000.00. The project budget is as follows: State Aid $250,000.00 Total $250,000.00 RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that Cope Avenue, Bituminous Mill and Overlay, City Project 96 -11 is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 96 -11 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized. COPE AVENUE MILL AND OVERLAY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT PAYMENT REQUEST ESTIMATE NO. FINAL CONTRACTOR: ACE BLACKTOP, INC. PERIOD ENDING: 10-18-96 CONTRACT AMOUNT: $206,789.65 QUANTITY UNIT .ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANT. TO DATE PRICE TOTAL 2021.501 Mobilization (5% maximum) LS 1.00 1.00 $8,000.00 $89000.00 0563.601 Traffic control LS 1.00 1.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 2104,.501 Remove B618 concrete curb and g utter LF 153.00 280.00 $5.50 $1$540.00 2104.501 Remove B624 concrete curb and g utter LF 324.00 420.00 $6.50 $2,730.00 2104.505 Remove bituminous median/pavement SY 361-00 545.00 $3.00 $1,635.00 2104-0505 Remove concrete drivewa SY 36-50 139.00 $10.00 $1,390.00 2104.511 Sawin concrete pavement/curb and g utter LF 181.00, 140.00 $4.75 $665000 21-04.513 Sawin bituminous pavement LF 37.00 175.00 $3.00 $525.00 2575.505 Soddin t salt resistant SY 216-00 750.00 $13-00 $9,750.00 2211.501 A base, Class 6 T 21.00 70.34 $15.00 $1,055.10 22.31.501 Bituminous patchin mixture T 3185.00 28-01 $35.00 $980-35 2231.505 Mixture for joints and cracks HW 163-00 779.00 $35-00 $27,265.00 2231.507 Joint and crack filler LB 2025-00 8745.00 $1.75 $15,303.75 2232-501 Mill bituminous surface 2" SY 10933-00 12375.00 $0.78 .$9.2652.50 2340.508 T 41 B wear course mixture T 3347.00 .3423.75 $21.15 $72,412.31 2357.502 Bituminous material for tack coat GAL 1456.00 2875.00 $1.15 $3y306.25 2531.501 Concrete curb and g utter, Desi B618 LF 151-00 2 $15-00 $4,200.00 2531.501 Concrete curb and g utter, Desi B624 LF 312.00 420.00 $16.00 $6,720.00 2531-503 Concrete median, 4" SY 175.00 86.00 $27.00 $2,322.00 2531.507 611 concrete drivewa pavement SY 58.50 35.00 $32.00 $19120.00 2531.507 8" concrete drivewa pavement SY 28.00 104.00 $47.00 $4,888.00 0564.602 Pvmt. mess. (r. arrow & onl pol preformed LF 2.00 0.00 $85.00 $0.00 0564.603 4" solid line white pol preformed LF 560.00 0.00 $2.50 $0.00 0564.603 4" solid line y ellow pol preformed LF 12061.00 0.00 $2.50 $0.00 0564.603 4" broken line white pol preformed LF 5957.00 0.00 $0.28 $0.00 0565.602 Loop detector (6'x 6') EA 2.00 2.00 $21000-.00 $4,000.00 0565.602 Loop detector (6'x 15') EA 2.00 2.00 $2.1500.00 $55000.00 0504.602 Adjust valve box EA 34-00 35.00 $125.00 $4,375.00 0506.602 Reconstruct/ catch basin EA 46.00 48.00 $145.00 $6,960-00 2506.522 Adjust frame and rin castin EA 37.00 33.00 $165-00 $5,445.00 TOTAL $213,240.26 COPE AVENUE MILL AND OVERLAY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT PAYMENT REQUEST Page 2 Original contract amount Change Order 1 Total contract work completed to date Total retainage (6 %) Previous payments AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE Contractor QQ�� �t . S � L Z SEV6 Date 3 - 4 !o Engineer Date $206,789.65 $3,020.00 $216,260026 $0.00 $202,440.50 $13,819.76 2 AGENDA ITEM F" o / ° AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer RE: Project 93 -08, Sterling Street & Schaller Drive Utility and Street Improvements Final Acceptance and Payment DATE: December 2, 1996 Action by Counai]. ;; Endorse Modified. Rei ected,., Date Attached to this report is the final payment request and the resolution accepting the project. The final construction cost of the project would be $763,348.50, less than 2% over the original bid price and well within the contingency. The contractor has spoken with Al Jirovec, the resident who had raised issues previously about the contractor's work in the boulevard adjacent to his property. They have come to an agreement which is acceptable to city staff. Mr. Jirovec is satisfied with the conditions of the agreement. Staff recommends the city councils' acceptance of the project and the final payment of $4,000.00 to the contractor. RAM RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that Sterling Street & Schaller Drive Utility & Street Improvements, City Project 93 -08 is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 93 -08 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized. 06 -20 -1996 10:00 612 770 4506 Citw of Maplewood P.01 ' PROJECT PAYMENT REQUEST PROJECT 93 - 08, STERLINGaSCNA►LLER IMPROVEMENT CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 53109 ' Estirriate No. 8 FINAL PAYMENT Period Ending; June 15, 1996 Contractor: Ryan Contracting, Inc. Contract Amount: $750,359.09 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT OUANT. QUANT. TO DATE UNIT PRICE TOTAL 021.501 Mobi lIzation LS 1.00 1.00 $7,500, $7,500 2 101.501 cisaring AC $5,000,00 1, 5 . G rubb ing C 0.10 0.00 -IS, SOM .601 R emove concret curb $ utter LF 170.00 12 3.00 2.0 $246.00 ,501 Remove i e sewer 50.00 .00 , E1044 - .506 .60 Remove blow o assemb EA 1. 1.0 $400.00 400.00 .511 awls concrete s►vernsnt L 8. 0 8. 20. 120.00 104.-5 Sawing turninous avement F 189.00 55.00 .50 . 0 104.523 Sal costing EA 140 1. 00 $95.001 $95.00 104.601 R emove misc. st ructure limestone foundation) LS 1. 111 1 ,12. 1, 20. 0104.50 Remove misc. bit, and /or concrete debts C 200,O0 200,00 $5.00 $1 106.501 Common excavat on CY 1,850.00 23,32 $1.20 $27,987.60 105.607 Sub rade excavation (EV CY 11600.00 .1, 9.00 0 $1,27 . 0 1 .522 Select ranular borrow CV CY "0 11 1,360.00 8.b0 3,840.D0 __ IF 105,525 To so orrow LV CY 762.00 0.00 I $8.00 $0.00 05.635 a v® ed to $o� V 3a 3,996. - 7,990. 1 5 Salvo o o soli from s ock ile V Y 384 0.00 $2.00 .00 01 .601 Streat sweep LwILh p ictcu broom HR 17.00 25.76 $60.00 $ 130.601 Application of water for dust control M( GAL) 34,00 15.00 $30 00 150,00 - - 211.601 re ate base eae 6 T 7,219.00 8 $6.50 $56,957.42 2 .601 Mill bituminous su a 1.5" Y 238.0 0 .87 340.508 41 wear course m xture 41 WE 5 5Y 1,219.0 13458.22 $2 $31,935.0 340.510 Ty is 32 b n er course m xture 2BIB50000Y 833.001 688.1 $21.05 $12,303.93 340.614 T e 32 ass course m xlur0 32BBBb 0Y 1,827.00 1,8 8,78 21. $35,769. 7.502 Bituminous meter al for tack coat GAL 1 635 .00 $1.00 35,00 50 .5 ' RC t e apron w tray g u ard 546. 1,090, 2 50f.615 21" F pipe a ronv /trash guard EA 1.00 1.00 86400 56 M. 502-6414" Perf. PE p1pe drain E � __s e otext le sec k LF 1 1 21 OZ 1,210. 8.0 $9 503.641 RCP storm sewer Des. 300 CI. III LF 1,440.0 1,465.00 $16.60 $21 503. 1 15" storm sewer vs, 3006 C . 1 ,00 302.00 $ 20.6T , $6,191.00 3.541 CP storm sewer Dos. . III L F 217,00 217.00 603.541.21 "' RCP storm Brewer 099. 30 06 C1. III LF 1 1 ,461.00 ,40 37,100,40 0503. Connect to ex stIn 8" D s anitary sewer A 1, 1.00 $760.00 $75. . 0503,5021 S anitary $ewer manhole, Wdeep EA 14.0 14.00 S1 $15,960.0 05031 2 6" x 4" PVC w e Schedul 23,0 28-00 $78.00 1 �b 060.02 8" x 4" VP sewer a 1.00 17,00 295.00 $5,015.00 503.11 3,Excess de th san to ry sewer man ole LF 184.75 151.01 $11,325.75 03.603 a eddin , 149,21Fjor8"PVC LT MMMMP 1 $19.47 3.80 , SDR 35, son. sewer e, 6 doe L .00 0 1 6.368,50 03. 0" PVC 5DR 35, san, sower e, 1 F -20' daep 503.60 LF 151.0 9 142,0 2 0503.6038 D1 52. so sew er pipe, 0 - dee LF 0 1 .00 $23, 0 A.00 05036 31V'DI Cl. 52, son, sewer pipe, 15'-2V deep F 5 46,00 533. 28.00 $14,924- 503. 031 Di, Ci, 5 ,son, sewer pipe, 2 '45' dee p LF 1 1 $35.00 " 926,455.00 60 3 8 outsi ro LF 6 86,00 $3 0503.603 4 I 0 Cl. 63, Ban. sewer aery ce P ip e LF B34.00 14.00 $8 0o 503. 4" DI, C1. 63, sen, sewer service riser pipe LF 233.00 243.00 $13. 00 5 .00 050 PVC, Sch, 40, son. sewer service pipe LF 933.00 1 00 $7.90 81547, 06 -20 -1996 10 : 01 612 770 4506 C i t w of Ma►P 1 e wo o d P.02 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANT TO DATE PRICE TOTAL r503,603 4" , W. 4 , son. sewer sere ce riser e L ,00 17. - - $7.30 124.10 )6 Connect o exist in water man EA 4.00 "33 , 0 1, �_, 0 )504 .602 4 ate Val and box 1 .00 1. 0 1 0.00 31 0.00 )604,60 ate va and box 8.00 8.00 360.00 2 880,00 00 04.60 ate val and o x .00 6.0 1,98_ )504.602 12a gote valve and box EA .00 4s00 341.00 "$1500 $ 3,3_4.00 $1 650,00 ) 604,602 A ust valve ox • water EA .00 11.00 )504 H rant EA 9. ,00 1,175.00 460� $9,400.00 -WEnnownftme - )504 cor or ation ,QO 45, 7 .00 ,240.00 )60 . cur s o and ox 4 .0 .00 ,500. 0 - LOOM YS 04.60 e r vent assembly - EA .0 4.00 Z7 . 1,1 . )504.603 4 DIP water maln, Cl, 53, wl of . encasement LF 94POO 19.00 321.00 $ 3 , W04.603 6" DI w ®ter men, C 63, w/poly, encasement 113.00 12loOD $22,00 Z, 62.00 )504,603 B* DIP water mai n, Cl. 52, w1p encasement 1,547.00 1,41$.0 $16,00 $22,688.0 )60 , DIP wat er main, , W1201Y. encasement LF 2 1.00 $23.70 $50,978.70 )04.603 a copp Type K water service p1pe LF 1 1 856.00 2 0 17,040,00 )50 2" r - polystyrene in sulati on 2.0 142.20 $9,00 51,279,8 M4 . 20 ucti a lion fi ttings 8 2,652. 00 2,305.0 )505,,6 03 Instal I util ity conduit crossings LF 5100.00 5,000 00 V.00 $5,000.00 2506.501 d rainage structure , Des. 8 2'x 3' ox L 43.09 40.37 $155.00 $5,257.35 26 .501 Construct dra na a structure, es. C 48' F 113.49 98. 5180, $17,807.40 2504 1 Construct drains a structure, Des. CS 60 LF 36, 19 43.42 $220.00 $0,652.40 -- 25 onstruc ra na e structure, es. 49 . 2506.501 Construct drainag structure, Des. UK 60" LF 21.55 22,49 18_0 4,04 906,516 Ca$Un assembl , R -1422-00 EA 21.00 9. 19.w mom 180.E $3,420.00 505.516 C asting assembly, R• 67 -1/ EA 31.00 3i .00 247.0 $7 2506 .522 Adjust frame & ring costing 17.00 19.00 $17 ,_ 25 00 D5 Connect Into sk s - ting drai structure .00 2.00 450,00 800.00 2511.507 routed r ra , CI. ill, Design 3133 CY 5. 1.40 _ x.00 - 547.20 26T.515 Oeotextile filter, Type IV SY 13.0 16.00 $3.60 $57.60 2 01.5011Concrete curb utter, Des, D412 F 2,630.00 3 $ 4.V5 $16,280,81 2531. 01 Concrat curb a utter Des, 4 8 t, . 4, 5 .0 0 3 55.00 ,�i 5.00 001 Yre �o controlOd x,00 �,OOfl.00 �$�,0�00.00 2573.502 Slit fence, heavy d uty , I ncludes me ntanence LF 800.00 465.00 $2. $1,046.25 $73,502 i t ence, reassemb ed, I maintenance 1 ,00 46.0 .00 920.00 2573,51 Rock entr, ad w!T v eo. fabr c,�ncl, ma nt. pwpw� EA 4.00 0.00 $500.00 $0.00 3.601 E rosion contro , contractor's tan 1 % m himum S 1.00 1.00 7, 00,00 7 OTTO 267 , 1 Seed AC 7.54 $225.OU ,696.50 2575.502 S eed, Mixture 375 LB 24.00 50.00 $ $70030 0 � 57s.m S M ixture 500 LS 120.00 760.00 $2.50 1, 75,00 1 67 .60 Sodding, e awn 4 1. 3 576.51 Mulch material, T e T 4.80 13.86 $1 40,00 0 an 57 .51 D S chor n AC 1 $658 .35 5 5.623 0o fiber blank regul ,00 .00 5,040. 2575,532 Commercial fertil Ana s s 8.24 -Z4 4.0 .00 471.25 TOTAL 06 -20 -1996 10:02 612 770 4506 CitW of Maplewood P.03 Origninal contract amount Total contract work completed to date Change Order 1 Change Order 2 Change Order 3 Less previous payments Subtotal Total retainago (0 %) Previous r otainage Additional retains0e , Subtotal Retainage AMOUNT O CO NTRACI ENGINEER $750,359.09 739,716.62 2,464.31 11,861.67 9,315.90 759,348.50 $4,000.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 0.00 $4,000.00 DATE. 20 OATS: Post -It" Fax Note 7671 Qa�D l Firo nt (o R , o „ Q ► �? To a •T4 " S S CoMepG g YA04 CO C0 ' A P L� Obi Pone u Phone 0 - �•-� ,.� �r�' L 0 q �,� 6 Fax 0 /� - / 3 MEMORANDUM Acton by Council: Ens. c rs e r3._.,_.,....,._..,._�, TO: M ichael A. McGuire, City Manager 11od if ea Date FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director nd creation DATE: November 26, 1996 for the December 9, 1996 Park - Commission Meeting SUBJECT: P.A.C. Fees Residential /Commercial Dedication by Developers INTRODUCTION Enclosed is an updated of park dedication fees for 1996. As can be noted the rates range from a low of $100 for a single family unit to a high of $1,300 per unit. The Maplewood residential rate is currently $225 based on a density of 3.4 units per dwelling for single family for a total of $765. It would be staff s recommendation that the 1997 . rate be increased by $75 to $300 per dwelling unit. BACKGROUND The City of Maplewood has two separate ordinances for P.A.C. fees, the first being the residential ordinance and the second being commercial/industrial ordinance. The money collected from the funds are the primary source for acquisition and development of the Maplewood parks system. The Parks and Recreation Commission voted unanimously to endorse staff recommendation to increase the 1997 P.A.C. rates. Staffs proposed recommendation is' $300 per dwelling unit, which would establish the following P.A.C. rates: Single dwelling $1,020 Double dwelling $1,728 Mobile home $ 750 Town home $ 810 Staff further recommended that the current commercial value of nine percent of the raw value not be increased. RECOMMENDATION It is staffs recommendation that the City Council endorse the proposed increase in residential P.A.C. fees to $300 /dwelling unit and that there be no increase in the commercial/industrial rates. kdlpacfees.mem Enclosure 1996 P.A.C. RATES . . Pee:/Unit 1998 Ratac Tntfll Single Dwelling 3.4 $225 .$765.00 Double Dwelling 5.4 $225 $1,215.00 Mobile Home 2.5 $225 $562.50 Townhouse 2.7 $225 $607.50 1987 P.A.C. RATES Pen-/Unit 1997 Rates Tntal Single Dwelling 3.4 $300 $1,020.00 Double Dwelling 5.4 $300 $1,728 Mobile Home 2.5 $300 $750.00 Townhouse 2.7 $300 $810.00 In regard to P.A.C. fees for apartment complex: If 3-4 units/building - 2.7 persons x rate x number of units If 5 units/building -1.9 persons x rate x number of units If elderly apartments: 1 bedroom 4W 1.1 persons x rate x number of units 2 bedroom - 2.0 persons x rate x number of units The commercial /industrial rate is 9 °r6 of the market value of the property. T PARK DEDICATION FEES TOTALS 1996 TYPE OF UNIT OR DEVELOaP1�IENT *CITY Single Family Duplex Townhouse/Quad Multi Family Mobile Rome Commercial Industrial per Unit per Unit per Unit per Unit Unit Develop. Develop. Lor"I (9rrel Plymouth $ 1.300.00 $ 1 9 ,30 0.00 $1 S1,300.00 $1 54,050.00 54 Eden Prairie 1 1 1 1,200.00 1,200.00 4 4,500.00 Chanhassen 1 1 900.00 900.00 1 4 4 Woodbury 1.000.00 1,000.00 1 800.00 350.00 2 2,000.00 Cottage 1,000.00 750.00 750.00 750.00 1,000.00 4% of Fair 4% of Fair Grove Market Val. Market Val. Lakeville 900.00 900.00 900.00 900.00 900.00 5% of Fair 5% of Fair • Market Val. Market Val. Maple 845.00 845.00 845.00 845.00 NA 3,600.00 2 Grove Brooklyn 800.00 800.00 600.00 600.00 NA 2,900.00 1 Park Maplewood P 765.00 607.50 607.50 2.7 person x 562.50 9% of Fair . 9% of Fair rate x #units Market Val. Market Va l. New 750.00 650.00 500.00 350.00 500.00 NA NA Brighton Little 625.00 625.00 NA 312.50 NA 5% of Fair 5% of Fair Canada Market Val. Market Val. Blaine 620.00 530.00 460.00 390.00 475.00 1 1 Oakdale 600.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 NA 1,800.00 1 Roseville 500.00 400.00 400.00 350.00 NA 4% of Fair 4 of Fair Market Val. Market Val. Crystal 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 Coon 384.00 326.00 286.00 238.00 291.00 1 1,152.00 Rapids Mounds 100.00 150.00 150.00 NA 3-4 200.00 1 0% of Fair 10% of Fair View 4 -5 250.00 Market Val. Market Val. Arden Hills 10% of Fair 10% of Fair SEE FORMULA BELOW Market Val. met Val. Shoreview 10% of Fair 10% of Fair SEE FORMULA BELOW Market Val. Market Val. Lino Lakes 200.4 SF of SEE FORMULA BELOW Proposed Buildin Golden Valley 1 UP TO 10% OF RAW LAND VALUE FOR ALL CATERGS. *hank order based on Single Family Unit rate. Arden Hills Residential fees are based on Boss density in dwelling: nit Acre �atg 0'00 2 6% 2 -3 7% 3-4 8% . over 4 10% Shoreview 0-2 4% FMV 2.1-3 5% FMV 3.1-4 6% FMV 4.1-5 7% FMV 5.1+ 10% FMV r Lino Lakes Land cost/acre (I 0.000/NEnimum) x ensity Factor % x SMbd. Acreagel Park Dedication per Unit Number of Lots in Subd. AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director AX :4 RE: RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET FOR 1997 DATE: December 2, 1996 PROPOSAL Action by Council: ]Endorsed Modified.-.,-� e j eote Date It is proposed that a resolution be approved to adopt the budget for 1997. According to State law, this must be done at the conclusion of the public hearing. BACKGROUND On September 3rd a special City Council meeting was held to review and discuss the 1997 Proposed Budget (see minutes attached). At the conclusion of the meeting, preliminary approval was given to the proposed budget. On December 5th a public hearing was held on the 1997 Proposed Budget. The amount listed in the attached resolution for the Park Development Fund is $200,000 higher than the amount listed on pages 4 -7 of the Proposed 1997 Budget. This is because the $200,000 planned for the Edgerton Park Improvements listed on pages 4 -11 of the Proposed 1997 Budget was omitted by error from the Park Development Fund total. BUDGET ADOPTION The attached resolution should be approved to adopt the 1997 Budget. P:\FINANCEIWP\AGN\AD0PTBUD.96 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR 1997 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, NIENNIESOTA that a budget for 1997 is hereby adopted as outlined in the following summary: CAPITAL DEBT OPERATING IMPROVEMENTS SERVICE gUDG.FT _ RUDr-,FT BUDGET Estimated Balances 01/01/97 $ 10,512,842 $2,458,841 $6,725,277 Revenues 21,105 3,475,330 2 Net other increases (decreases) 418,790 1,736,760 929,180 Expenditures 21,233,140 4,555,880 3,864,090 Estimated Balances 12/31/97 $ 10,803,562 $3,115,051 $5 BE IT F[JRTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 1997 Operating Budget: GENERAL FUND: DEPARTMENT $ 803,450 Community Development 541,570 Finance 1,313 Fire 2,187,840 General Government 1,011,950 Parks and Recreation 4,243,250 Police 1 _771.00O Public Works $11,872,170 GENERAL FUND TOTAL CHARITABLE GAMBLING TAX FUND: 10,000 General Government DENTAL SELF - INSURANCE FUND: 71,000 General Government ENHANCED 911 SERVICE FUND: 13,810 Police HAZARDOUS MATERIALS FUND: 10,820 General Government RECREATION PROGRAM FUND: 554,590 Parks and Recreation RECYCLING FUND: 220,740 Community Development COMMUNITY CENTER FUND: 1,774,720 Parks and Recreation SANITARY SEWER FUND: 3,375,630 Public Works WATER FUND: 43,590 Public Works V.E.M. FUND: 410,540 Public Works DATA PROCESSING FUND: 339,890 General Government PAYROLL BENEFITS FUND: - 9P535i640 General Government $21,233,140 TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS PARINANCE\WMMADOWBUD.96 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the expenses for the Community Center Operations Fund may exceed the appropriation provided that the net loss for 1997 is less than $133,560. BE IT FUR RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 1997 Capital Improvements Budget: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND $ 250,050 OPEN SPACE LAND ACQUISITION FUND 501,430 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 1,164,770 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2,943,890 STREET CONSTRUCTION STATE AID FUND 850 TAX INCREMENT FUND 196,270 WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE — NO. ST. PAUL 50 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS $4,555,880 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director shall establish a budget for each public improvement project when the Council orders the project and that the budget amounts shall be recorded at amounts specified in the feasibility study for the project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 1997 Debt Service Budget: $2,200,000 Principal 1,622,190 Interest 5,430 Paying Agent Fees 21,290 Interest -- Interfund Loans _ 15.180 Investment Management 3,864,090 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above budgets for Governmental Funds are hereby adopted for financial reporting and management control. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above budgets for all other funds are hereby adopted for management purposes only. PARNANCEMMAGMADOPTBUD.96 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the transfer of appropriations among the various accounts within a department budget or within a non - departmental expense category, within a fund, shall only require the approval of the City Manager. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all appropriations which are not encumbered or expended at the end of the fiscal year shall lapse and shall become part of the unencumbered fund balance which may be appropriated for the next fiscal year except appropriations for capital improvement projects which shall not lapse until the project is completed or canceled by the City Council. P ARNANCE\WMAGNNADOPTBUD.96 CO UNCHJMANAGER WORKSHOP OF THE CITY OF MAPLEW OOD 5:00 p.m Monday, September 3, 1996 Maplewood Room, City,Hall TE A. CALL TO ORD The meeting was called to order by Acting Mayor Allenspach at 5 :00 p.m. B. ROLL_ CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Present (arrived at 5:15 p.m.) Councilmember Sherry Allenspach Present Councilmember Dale Carlson Present Councilmember Marvin Koppen Present Councilmember George Rossbach Present Others Present City Manger Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager Craig Dawson Finance Director Dan Faust C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA City Manager McGuire asked that the following items be added: (L1) Carver and Edgerton Community Centers Grand Openings; (L2) Pre - Agenda Meeting for September 5, 1996; (L3) Police Sgt. Dreger Retirement; (L4) Status of Ramsey County Park Transfer; and (LS) Proposed Medical Clinic. Councilmember Carlson moved approval of t, he aizenda as amended. The motion was seconded b y Councilmember Rossbach and approved. Ayes: All September 3, 1996 Council/Manager workshop Page Two D. PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF AUDITING FIRM Finance Director Faust outlined a process and timeline for selecting an auditing firm. The Ci ty p of Maplewood has contracted with KPMG Peat Marwick LLP for the past 13 Y differing. ears. There are differin hies about whether or how often one should consider P char in auditing fu'ms. An audit firm technically reports to the City Council, and a g g g selection committee should have a Council representative on it. Councilmember Koppen moved that a committee be formed to include the Mayor ,(or his designee from the Council,, thg. CiV Manager and the Finance Director for 12 oses of 5glecting a firm to perform audit servicea gf t finances. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion and it was approved. Ayes: All E. RECOVERY OF UNBILLED RECYCLING AND HYDRANT CHARGES Finance Director Faust explained the utility billing process and how, over nearly 20 Y ears, some properties (64 for hydrant charges, 139 for recycling services) had not been included in the billing system. Mayor Bastian arrived at 5:15 p.m. Councilmember Carlson moved that the City adjust billings tt, recover these unbilled ch ar iz es for balances due ii jo one year. d e interest. Councilmember Koppen seconded the motion and it was approved. Vote on the motion: 4 -1 (Councilmember Rossbach opposed). F. r RECOVERY OF UNBILLED SEWER CHARGES Finance Director explained the utility billing process and how some properties had not been included in the billing system. Councilmember Carlson moved that the Citv adiust billings to recover these unbilled gharaes 1 v . Councilmember Koppen seconded the motion and it was approved. Vote on the motion: 4 - 1 (Councilmember Rossbach opposed). September 3, 1996 Council/Manager Workshop Page Three G. 1997 PROPOSED BUDGET 1....0.yer"Vie Discus _ _s�on City Manager McGuire presented an overview and highlights of the 1997 Proposed Budget. He reviewed assumptions in estimating revenues and expenditures in operations, g p g capital improvements, and debt service. Proposed expenditures for City operations were summarized as follows (figures are rounded): * Community Development: increase of 1.4 %, to $1,025,000 Councilmember Carlson asked about what plans were under consideration for the recycling collection contract in 1997. It was decided to discuss this matter further at a future Council meeting. Finance: increase of 4.1 to $540,000 Fire: increase of 19.4 %, to $1,315,000 General Government: increase of 2.8 %, to $5,155,000 * Parks and Recreation: increase of 12.7 %, to $3,340,000 Mayor Bastian suggested a program begin where residents can "adopt" a part of the Community Center buildings and grounds. He was also concerned about one of the objectives of the Nature Center division- - public education to increase awareness of Jim's Prairie. It is difficult to access, and vegetation would be damaged due to additional visitors. * Police: increase 1.1 to $4,255,000 There was brief discussion about Community - oriented Policing and Community - oriented Services initiatives. * Public Works: decrease of 5.0 %, to $5,600,000 In the General Fund * Revenue would increase 9.5% from 1996 to 1997 * Expenditures would increase 3.3% from 1996 to 1997 * Transfers to other funds -- Community Center, Recreation Programs- -would be $442,460 (compared to $181,250 in the 1996 budget) * The projected fund balance would be $4,065,000, up 11.4% over the 1996 adopted budget. The balance would be 34.2% of budgeted. expenditures * Per capita expenditures would increase 1.8% (which is less than the projected. p p 2.8% rate of inflation), and the population served would increase 1.5% In Commun ity Center operations the projected net loss for 1997 would be $389,000. Staff is developing a plan which would gradually reduce the net loss to $0 in 2000. Councilmembers suggested that metropolitan universities be contacted for students to do a case study in marketing and improving the financial situation of the Community Center. September 3, 1996 Council/Manager Workshop Page Four The Capital Improvement portion of the proposed budget reflected Council action on July 8, 1996, to adopt the 1997 -2001 Capital Improvement Plan totalling $14,619,000. The 1997 proposed budget showed implementation of the first year of this plan, which identified $4,358,000 for improvements. It included using $500,000 in TIF receipts to purchase the commercial property north of the Community Center. Councilmembers expressed concern that $100,000 may not be sufficient funding for an effective street overlay and sealcoat program. In De..., bt Service the City's obligations for 1997 total $1,525,000, down $450,000 from the 1996 outlay due to retirement of some bonds and reduced installments on several others. Future annual debt service payments for existing bonds would be reduced slightly for 1998, and then increase to a relatively constant $1,600,000 level for, 1999 -2003. The City's long -term debt was increasing 1.0 % from 1996 to 1997, to $27,700,000. 2 Ambulance Rates for 19V Finance Director Faust reviewed the reasons for recommending an increase in ambulance rates for 1997. Councilmember Allenspach moved to adopt the resolution to set ambulance rates for , 1997. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion and it was approved. Vote on the motion: 4 -1 (Councilmember Rossbach opposed). 3. Ordinance To Set SevYer Rates for 1997 (First reading Finance Director Faust reviewed the reasons for recommending an increase in sewer rates for 1997. The proposed ordinance would continue a flat quarterly fee based on class of customer. City Manager McGuire mentioned that changes to include avolume -based rate may be suggested for the second reading of the proposed ordinance. Mayor Bastian moved to alDnrove the first reading of an ordinance to .set sewer rates for 1997. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion and it was approved. Ayes: All 9. Selection of Dates for Public Hearings on Proposed 1997 Budget Dates and times proposed for the public hearings required by statute were: 6:30 p.m. Thursday, December 5, with continuation if necessary to 6:30 p.m. Thursday, December 12. The final hearing would be scheduled for 7:00 p.m. Monday, December 9 or December 16, depending on whether the initial hearing needed to be continued to December 12. September 3, 1996 Council/Manager Workshop Page Five 4 lection li c Headngs d 7 Bud a continued Mayor Bastian noted the National League of Cities I congress is often held on dates which may conflict with these hearing dates. This item would hi dered at the Septembgr 9. 19 City Council meeting. 5. Adoption of Proposed Prollertv Tax LevtiPavable in 1997 Councilmember Carlson moved to adopt the resolution setting the Ci 's 12rqgo5gd pMpgrty, tax jgyy movable in 1997. Mayor Bastian seconded the motion and it was approved. Ayes: All H. STATUS REPORT ON 1996 BUDGET OBJECTIVES City Manager McGuire presented a report on the status of progress toward the 164 objectives listed in the 1996 adopted budget. I. OUTDOOR SEASONAL SALES OPERATIONS Council decided to continue consideration of this item to the October 7, 1996 Council/Manager Workshop. J. DEER MANAGEMENT Assistant City Manager Dawson reviewed a request by a resident for management of the deer population in south Maplewood, and a staff memorandum which related the number of incidents reported to police involving deer and suggested processes to develop a deer management plan. The Council decided not to- proceed with deer management planning at this time, and directed staff to continue monitoring the situation and to write a letter to the resident about the Council's action. Mayor Bastian suggested that a Mayor's Forum, possibly the one for November 1996, have the topic of wildlife management (which would include deer and geese, among other species). �fl • r September 3 1996 Council/Manager Workshop Page Six K. FIRE. DEPARTMENT UPDATE City Manager McGuire related progress with Gladstone and Pazkside Fire Departments on proposed agreements for their merger into the Maplewood Fire Department. He noted that there was significant agreement on most matters among the negotiating group. 111 19 11 _ 1 d Edgerton Communit Center Grand Openings: These openings will 1. Carver an g tY b e he September 4 and 5, respectively, beginning at 6:00 p.m. with a formal ceremony h p � at 6:20 p.m. Meeting for September 5 Council decided to cancel this 2. Pre-Agenda g p meeting. 3 3. Sergeant g Dre er Retirement: The retirement party for 32 -year veteran Police Sgt. Dick Dre g er was scheduled for the evening of Sunday, September 8, 19960 he Ramsey Cou 4. Ramsey County Park Transfer: y Board of Commissioners had transfer of arks from Ramsey voted to approve the p Y County to the City of Maplewood. al Clinic: A radiology lab and clinic 5. Medic gY c is being proposed on land north of Saint J ohn ' s Hospital. Y os ital. The land currently has five houses on it, but the long -term plan for the area is commercial and service. M. FUTURE TOPICS The list of future topics was noted. N. A JOURNBMT_ At 7.34p.m • . , Mayor Bastian moved that the meetin e adiourned Councilmember Carlson seconded and the motion was approved. There was no further discussion. Ayes: All v � AGENDA NO AGENDA REPORT Action by Council.:, TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director Endorse Rejected. Date . RE: RESOLUTION LEVYING PROPERTY TAXES PAYABLE IN 1997 DATE: Decemb �1-9 96 After the public hearing is held, a resolution needs to be approved that will levy property taxes for 1996 payable in 1997. The amounts listed in the resolution have been reduced by $1,559,920 which is the homestead and agricultural aid (RAGA) that the City will receive in 1997. It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted which will levy the same amount as the proposed levy approved by the Council on September 3, 19960 rb Attachment P:\F1NANCE\WP\AGN\PR0PTX.96 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TAXES PAYABLE IN 1997 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MApL,� MINNESOTA that: WOOD, 1. The following amounts of taxes b ' e levied for 1996, payable in 1997 upon • • n said City f Maplewood, � P the net tax capacity i ty P , for the followin purposes: g Operations $5,529,980 Capital Improvements 370,000 Debt Service Lr 1 _08,400 TOTAL LEVY $7,424 2. In addition, there is a $416,500 market value based referendum levy for 1996 payable in 1997 to finance the debt service on the 1994 Open Space Bonds. 3. There is on hand in the following sinking g king funds excess amounts as indicated a o after each fund and such shall be used to pay n the appropriate obligations of the City: DESCRIPTION 1967 General Obligation Sanitary ewer B I' Y B onds 1977 Public is Works Building Bonds $12,000 1977 General Obligation Improvement p nt Bonds Series 1 1977 General Obligation Improvement 3,500 27,700 Bonds Series 2 1979 General Obligation' Improvement Bonds 111000 1989 General Obligation Improvement p t Bonds 2,000 1992 General Obligation Refunding Bonds Serie s 1992A 1 993 E ui rn ent Certificates Series q p 13,430 363,757 1993A 1993 Tax Increment Bonds Series 19 93B 967 1 993 General Obligation Refunding Bonds 1994 . 9 Series 1993C Open Space Bonds 18 603 " 50,846 TOTAL 1 $521,329 In accordance with Minnesota Statues 475.61 and 273.13, Subd. 19 (3) (a) (b) 297a and Chapter 162 of Minnesota Statues, the County Auditor of Ramsey , ounty her bhapter authorized and directed to reduce by the amounts above mentioned the tax that would otherwise be included in the rolls for the Year 1996 and collectible in 1997. 4. It has been determined that the foil ' owing sinking funds have insufficient ro'ected Projected liabilities, as required b State p J assets to meet • y to Statute, and original resolution levying must be increased. b the following y g ad- valorem taxes Y ng amounts: 1977 Refunding Bonds 1989 Tax Increment Bonds $3%300 1990 General Obligation Im rovemen 71 570 P t Bonds 1991 General Obligation Improvement Bonds 19 0 1995 TOTAL Series 1991A 107 5 696 General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1 ' TO 995A $ 173,756 5. Changes set forth in 3 and 4 section • s above result In a net decrease of $ 347 , 573 levy of $1, 872 473 . in the scheduled PAFINANCEIWP\AGN\PR0PTX.96 Action by Co nciI ;l MEMORANDUM Endorse Modif i e d:--.,.,., TO: City Manager Re j e c t e FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner date SUBJECT: Wetland Buffer Variance - General Sprinkler Corporation p LOCATION: County Road D, East of Highway 61 DATE: November 21, 1996 INTRODUCTION Project Description Frank Winiecki, of General Sprinkler Corporation, is proposing to build a 13,200- square -foot, one - story building for his business. This building would be on the south side of County Road D east of Highway 61. This site is 1,100 feet northeast of the new Lexus dealership on Highway 61. Refer to the maps on pages 6--7. Request The applicant is requesting that the city council approve a variance for a narrower wetland- protection buffer. Refer to the proposed site plan on page 8. City code requires a wetland buffer of 100 feet for site. The proposed undisturbed buffer would range in width from 40 feet to 100 feet. Mr. Winiecki, therefore, is asking for a . variance of up to 60 feet in reduced buffer width. Please see the site plan date - stamped November 1, 1996 on page 8 and the separate attachment. The city code requires the wetland buffer to protect the adjacent wetland surrounding this site. The Ramsey- Washington Metro District classified this wetland as a Class 1 wetland. Class 1 wetlands are those with conditions and functions most susceptible to human impact, are most unique and have the highest community resource significance. Mr. Winiecki plans to apply for design approval if the city council grants this variance. DISCUSSION Mr. Winiecki has oriented the proposed 13,200 square -foot building parallel to County Road D facing north. Mr. Winiecki hired Peterson Environmental Consultants to review the watershed district wetland delineation and to make their own decision about the wetland locations and types. The watershed district staff met with the consultant and has reviewed their report. (See the memo from Pat Conrad on page 9 and the memo from Peterson Environmental Consulting starting on page 10.) On the east and south sides of the site, the watershed district decided that the wetland edge is south and east of the ditch. This Leaves an undisturbed buffer area of at least 65 feet on the east and south sides of the site. The proposed site plan shows the wetland at least 120 feet south of the south property line. The watershed district, however, does not have enough information or documentation to verify this location. They want Mr. Winiecki to have his consultant locate the edge of the wetland south of the .ditch and then they would verify the consultant's work. On the west side of the site, Mr. Winiecki shows the wetland edge as the top of the west bank of the west ditch. This provides at Feast 40 feet of undisturbed area between this wetland edge and the bottom of the spoil pile on the east side of the west ditch. Mr. Winiecki proposes to grade the site up to the bottom of the spoil piles on the east side of the ditch. The proposed undisturbed wetland buffer should be wide enough to meet the intent of the code. Wetland buffers serve as a way to preserve water quality, lessen development impact and provide wildlife habitat and aesthetic benefit. As now proposed, the plan is meeting these needs. Lexus Site Regarding the Lexus variance, the city council allowed the reduced wetland buffer width because of the poor condition of the existing buffer on that site. The previous owner had filled and compacted the Lexus site over many years. As such, the land next to the wetland did not provide any benefit as a wetland buffer. The city council decided that a 25- foot -wide functional buffer would be more beneficial than a 100 -foot -wide hard- packed, nonfunctional buffer. COMMISSION ACTION On November 18, 1996, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed wetland buffer variance request for this proposal. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on page 15. This resolution approves a 60 -foot wetland buffer variance for the proposed General Sprinkler Corporation building on County Road D, east of Highway 61. The city should approve this variance because: 1. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of. the ordinance. The Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District has classified the adjacent wetland. as a Class 1 wetland —the most significant wetland type. The proposed variance would not be excessive and would still protect the wetland, which is the intent of the ordinance. 2. The applicant has shown that strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property and not created by the property owner. Undue hardship means the owner or developer cannot put the property to a reasonable use if the city denies the variance. The 100- foot -wide wetland buffer requirement would make development of this site difficult. The wetland ordinance created the difficulty and the proposed variance is not excessive. 3. The proposal offers protection to the wetland for wildlife habitat and aesthetic enhancement, which are also functions of a wetland buffer. E Approval is subject to the applicant or owner doing the following: 1. Submitting a certificate of survey for the area that shows the location of: a. The ditch and wetland to the south and east of the site. b. The ditch and wetland to the west of the site. c. All property lines. d. County Road D and any existing utilities. e. The existing culverts for the ditches on either Side of the site. f. The location, size and species of any large trees on the site. 2. Submitting grading. and landscaping plan for the perimeter areas of the site between the driveways .and parking lot and the wetland edge (including the wetland buffer ). This plan shall be subject to the requirements of the city staff and the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District. 3. Dedicating a wetland- buffer easement. This easement shall be prepared by a land surveyor, shall describe the boundary of the buffer and shall prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. The applicant shall record the deed for this easement before the city will issue a building permit. 4 Follow the site plan date - stamped November 1, 1996, subject to any changes required by city staff or the community design review board (CDRB). 5. Accepting responsibility for any necessary maintenance and upkeep of the ponding area and any sump catch basins. 3 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.79 acres Existing land use: undeveloped SURROUNDING LAND USES North County Road D and 1 -694 South.: Undeveloped ro ert P p Y West: Two single dwellings East: Northern States Power substation and driveway PAST ACTION February 26, 1996: The city council approved a wetly • pp wetland buffer reduction variance of 75 feet for the new Lex us .Dealership. The code required 100 feet, but the council a 25- foot -wide buffer. This w cil allowed Lexus to provide as because of the poor condition o the existing buffer on the site. f g Lexus PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: M -1 (light manufacturing) Zoning: M-1 Ordinance Requirements Section 9- 196(h)(3) requires a 100 =fo - ' q of wide wetland - preservation buffer adjacent to the wetlands that are near the proposed site. Findings for Variance Approval State law requires that the city council make the following • zoning code: Ong findings to approve a variance from the 1. Strict enforcement would ca -use undue e hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. q 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit ' p g pit and intent of the ordinance. 4 "Undue hardship," as used in granting of a variance, means the ro ert in question cannot be p p Y q put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the localit Economic considerations Y alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. p :sec3lwiniecki.5th Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. 11 -1 -96 Site Plan 4. 10 -28 -96 memo from Watershed District 5. 10- 2.8 -96 memo from Peterson Environmental Consulting 6. Wetland Setback Variance Resolution 7. Site Plan date - stamped November 1, 1996 (separate attachment k M w � VADNAIS HEIGHTS 19 O COUNTY RD. p A< Z Attachment 1 COUNTY 0 UJ z I AVE. rv�sst 1�ark BROOKS AVE. E. v� S ao 3 4. o V7 SEX TANT z "Waft 2 �.� • AVE. � 1. SUMMIT CT. 2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR. o Q z Z 6 Z LGERVAIS GRANDVIEW J 3. DULUTH CT. 4. LYDIA ST. � � � Y 1� yN S ° Z CT. m VIKING DR. w Y SHERREN AVE. o l ad BEAM C AVE AVE. 'T Kohiman \Lake COUNTY K ohlmon Cn Pork N ►R a 5 3 VE• U AVE. � �o w S J o �u SEXTANT AVE. � AF 19 � 0 o RADATZ 0 3 w Markham p MESSABI v w w _ Pond RAI col ~ C0i KOHLMAN AVE. 0 z th w KOHLM • Q Ha� } • Pork AVE. ROAD C °C @ z TD _ � '� rn C;r �i Z W 0 Z Z o Cr w W a iN NOR z X EDGEHILL RD. z. AVE. v � GERMS AV = v I C OP COPE j J LARK Z CT. W n 25 O nn � H DEMON I AVE. rv�sst 1�ark BROOKS AVE. E. v� S ao V7 SEX TANT z AVE. i— AVE. � Se ason* o >- GERVAIS X U.) q Park Q Z LGERVAIS GRANDVIEW -� 0 AVE. Z CT. m VIKING DR. w Y SHERREN AVE. Knuc�C a l ad Lake C AVE. AVE. v LARK o AV . E. • V) LOCATION MAP 6 4 N Q+ + = ^ t•,.,,,, .., 4- n VADNAIS HEIGHTS too 10/ \p0 �° COUNTY R D : ■, 0' `7 _ 732 1 66"m www p . ::s :: :::::::: :•r:::v 132 � :.:.::::_::::::: ::::::::::::: :: � , � -_ - -. - -- 0 1322 ... •::::::;•:•.:::•.:.•:.:•......:... :.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:::.:: .:.:.•:.� >..:::::::�::::::: :::: (9) . ..... •''_'�'•�• N NSA 3110 ...::; : ;::::: ;: .::::::::::::::::�: �::;:•. :....; ..•.;.::;. v:: .•.;.:•:.:•.:•.•.•:.•.v.•. : :•.• .: ::: S: {.;:;:••••r..; ;.;.:•..:•. .:•.•.:•..v. ::•.: :•.:•.:•. i A 1 ?'tip'' 3085 3090 4 o. y i get t— o- o- a•- - O �. ----{ �--- -� � � . �- 23. �� o o ' P. P P r c x n i 9 h T n `o n a 2 •� ''`� �" BACKYARD Q BUILDING ; SYSTEMS 732 Q �5 0 , 0 EXUS p. D o, W E Q 3000 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Q N Attachment 3 ......... I a I t Iw 0 COUNTY ROAD D ocsa T 7 '0 i"..0"000W sr" Ul --- +., �,..�,,. �;� PROPOSED B LDI • -A ot 0 vow% 6 10'% OWN" 'S SO 0 vow. • ♦6 *on Vs L sees • j! > 4w is sow f woe- % 1 W f a "es l%•► %ogs 46 2&1&,L %0% 1 4 , 1L 1 In ta&Aoa ew" P -0 V%'% PRO P ERTY LINE '*E WETLAND EDGE LAW SURVEY . 6. s f. bomoot wor ft" ft MA OWAINO 0 ft S. 4 f ft ftp F It So, a doessow t000 %.ft C& M —000. of I I I H do 0 010 a GOMW Wool 6" ab Ono-I. a dwpow 0 now 0- eo ohm . NOV '396 J e EXISTING DITCH WETLAND EDGE EXISTING DITCH,!.'b',—, O • hw SITE PLAN F **1 4 Ramsey- Washington Metro District oo• o� October 28th, 1 996 Scott Krych Peterson Environmental Re General Sprinkler Dear Mr Krych LL.yL a1VIV AUZI wf!' #UuCJ Attachment 4 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 (612) 777 -3665 fax (612) 777 -6307 OW 19 Thank you for meeting with the District TEE panel to discuss the wetland de at. the above referenced site. The purpose of this letter is to sunmian*ze the co nclusions of the TEF panel meeting. The wetland delineation along the eastern ditch was moved to the opposite side of the ditch at a maximum. The wetland begins on the east and south side of the eastern ditch. The wetland along the western ditch was also moved to the western bank of the ditch, The area to the west of the western ditch will be considered wetland until the ap can show that the hydrology parameter is not met. T PP he TEP panel needs to see. conclusive evidence in the form of water level measurements throughout the growing season which show that the hydrolo parameter is not met. If you have a n y ques tions regarding this site please contact me at 777 - 3665, Sincerely, Pat J, Conrad District Technician cc Ken Roberts 9 0 �� t ~d "II 1 L I_•i C 9 L Z L Z 9 ZZ: 966T PETERSON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. Attachment 5 MEMO R "DUM TO: Melinda Colenuu4 Cityo FROM: Ronald P. Peterson, Pres de James L. Arndt, Ph.D, essio -o cien 'st - ZA Mike DeRuyter, Soils S P ecialis Scott Krych, Professional. Wetland Scientist Mike Graham, Professional Wetland Scienti DATE: October z 8,1996 SUBJECT: Frank Winiecki Site, County Road D Maplewood ty � p PEC Project No. 96 -089 Per out earlier telephone conversations, ' p ons, Peterson Environmental Consultung, Inc. (PEC), has undertaken additional coordination with the Ramse Y gtc -Wad y rl -Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) in order to review their wetland delineation on Oroperties ad`oinin adjoining the Winiecki property. The purpose of this memorandum is to docur#ent revisions made to the wetland delineation and to address the City's wetland buffer requirements as they pertain to the subject property. Wetland De inea The wetland was originally delineated by the Ramsey -Was n Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) on the northern and eastern sides of two ditches which P arallel the southern and western site boundaries. According to fi eld observations made b y PEC staff on October 14 and 15, 1996, the delineated areas consist of a forestedpeatland which has been drained and filled. The area is not indicated as wetland on : National Wetlands Inventory maps, and soils are identified as earth fill material over 'o soils b the y g y Soil Survey of Washington and Ramsey Counties. As indicated by the soil survey, soils on the site consist of various fill knaterials, mcludin g peat (See Attached Data Forms). Direct evidence of wetland hydrology was not present at the time of the site visit. The strongest evidence of disturbed hydrolog in the wetland was the presence of noon saturated Peat. Because these soils develop due to a persistent water table within 6 inches of the surface, free water surfaces at d � the of 18 inches or more indicate an altered hydrologic regime. Watcr tables at the tine of the site visit were observed at depths of approximately 30 inches. When histosols (pe ats) are draine d, 10 11 pin �7, a m 3 0 2 i were observed at depths of app roximately 3 0 inches. F y When hi StosOls (pests) are drained, the organic material begins to decay and subside. Surface roots of box elders are exposed in the area by subsidence. These exp roots and b - Fo ba ses of tree: bv� likely reflect subsidence and not a reaction to ndin or inundation • Po g , as there were no drift lines, grater marks, or sediment deposits which would su est fl ' • gg ooding or f nundation. Other evidence of subsidence includes ver ell ulated Org anic rY gran ganic surfac0s, and very low bulk densities above the water table. Undisturbed peatlands are normally y dominated by obligate wetland vegetation s uch as sedges, cattails willows - $ - , etc. The area north of the ditch currently is dominated bY facultative- upland (FACU ) vegetation, wi • w i t h the remainder of gie pLant comet . ma, osed of faculty 'v � unity composed facultat (FAC) and facultative -wet (FACW) ve etas on. Due to e - g the fact that the area does not meet the wetland vegetation or hydrol g . enteria, the wetland boundary was moved to the south and west sides of - the ditch. Thy 10 foot wide spoil bank on the western side of the ditch, is dominated . by creeping charlie (Glecoma hederacea, FA.CU) and coin mon buckthorn Rh=nus • cathard ca, FA,C and is topographically 1 -2 feet higher than the rest of the wetland therefa pos cons u ,re i is our posltlon that it should also be consi land. However the P RWMWD has not conceded the spoil pile to be upland. The new "questionable" wetland boon da y, therefore, is shown on Figure l as being at the south and west ed c of the ' ' ' g drainage ditch, essentially at the property boundary. This new line has been agreed to b the R y (see attached letter dated October 28, 1996). The area within this revised boon i . dart' i's considered to be questionable since it appears to lack wetland hydrolo y gy. The plant community within the revised wetland bound is do . . art' by FAC ttunated V�, FACU and FAC species .and is underlain by histosols however the area may lack wetland hydrology. Because histosols have such a high moisture holdin ca aci g p ty, it has been our expenence that climax plant communities in drained eatlands are not dorninat . P ed by species characteristic of uplands, but rather species more commonl associated wi . Y th transitional wetland areas. Further hydrologic investigation may; prove the revised questionable wetland area is also non - jurisdictional. Since wetlandd hydrology cannot Y gY t be accurately determined at this tune, we are assum n that this area is jurisdictional. g WETLAND BURS The City of Maplewood has recently mandated . P y that buffer zones be mauttauied around the perimeter of wetlands and that a 1 0-foot setback from the buffer edg be required for building foundations (Buildings and Building Regulations Code Sec. 195. The width of the buffer zone vanes depending upon how the wetland was clawi&d in the RVTMWD - Wetlands Inventory. The subject wetland has been classified as C 1 which m cans that it was designated as Unique and Outstanding in the ward district invento e . ry. Th buffer Zone required around Class 1 wetlands is loo feet. The cwrrerit development plan for the property would require an encroachment of the southwest corner of the building foundation of 15 feet ' into the wetland buffer zone (this includes ;the additional 10' building setback). An additional 45 feet of eneroac hnatent would occur for the Page 2 11 1 . 1 1 t 1 construction of parking area, an entrance road and landscaping in on the west side of the building. The buffer zone encroachment distances given are bated on the wetland boundary including the spoil bank on the west side of the ditch as detenn;ined b the RW BASIS FOR VARIANCE REQUEST we have reviewed the variance provisions in the Maplewood Wetland Ord ce and believe a variance would be warranted in the rtion of the Winiecki prop that falls po p pe� w tai h the buffer. The reasons a variance appears warranted are as fol,ows: (1) The spirit and intent of the City's wetland ordinance can readily be served by a reduced buffer along the west side of the Winiecki property. The ordinance states that buffers "are integral to rnaintainin the valuable functions m g S any wetlands perform. Buffers reduce the impacts of surrounding land use on wetlands and .streams by stabilizing soil to prevent erosion by stormwater; f lteri ' suspended solids nutrients and harmful substances; and moderating water level flue tua ont during storms. Buffers also provide essential wildlife habitat. Finally, buffers reduce the adverse in►pacts of human activities on wetlands and streams." Certainl iu lands adjacent to Y� p 1 wetlands in most locations serve most or all of these functions. Hdwever, in this case these buffer functions are not being provided in the buffer zone area 'where development would occur on the Winiecki property. In looking at a cross - sectional view of the site (Figure 2), the buffer zone within the property is primarily composed of the drainage ditch, an artificial berm created throu the deposition of old ditch spoil and an adjacent area on the other si4e of the spoil pile. P P The bean prevents storm water from running off the site into the a dj acent ditch under existing conditions; this spoil pile would remain with the ro sed : development. The P Po P proposed project plan would develop the property up to the edge of the berm so that any water not contained within the storm water treatment pond on - site would be contained b the beam. The 45'-wide area proposed for development within the buffer zone is not currently serving as a buffer to the questionable wetland area `ovidin an by Pt S Y of the water quality functions identified in the City or dinance. Even if storm water were allowed to run off -site, the existing drainage ditch would prevent this water from entering the questionable wetland area. The undisturbed buffer area consisting of the top of the spoil pile and the sideslope of the ditch are sparsely vegetated and are currently not serving the questionable wetland by providing erosion prevention;' filtering suspended solids, nutrients and hanuful, substances; or moderating water level fluctuations. Further, the highly disturbed nature of the buffer zone has resulted m' limited wildlife habitat value. The remainder of the buffer zone consists of the drainage ditch itself and a spoil pile on the western bank of the ditch. The e ditch provides a water quality function to the questionable wetland by not all storm water to enter the area unless the ditch floods. This drainage ditch would not be impacted b the rQ osed project. P� Y P P P � Page 3 12 Figure 2. Coss- Sectional View of West Property Boundary Buffer Zone I Revved "Questionable" _,♦ + West Property Wetland Area . C..n�l wife. Winiecki is also proposing to construct a stortnwater treatment pdnd on -site to ensure pre - treatment of any runoff from imp surfaces p discharge p rior to its; a into the g County Ditch. Ongoing coordination will be maintained with the R and the Ci Engineer to ensure that the pond is designed to meet all applicable water quality standards. (2) Strict enforcement of the ordinance would work an undue hardship on the applicant. We believe that a variance from the buffer and building setback re Q ui Justified meets are in this case. It is apparent that the portion of the subject P roperty within the buffer zone is not serving any of the buffer functions set forth in the City ordinance. A strict enforcement of the buffer and building . setback re urements would result in a hardship to the project proposer since the proposed building aad associated p#king lot cannot be reconfigured to avoid the buffer zone. The unique shape of the ro ' does not allow P I y for as many alternative designs or buil ding locations as might otherwise be available on a more rectangular site. Further, although there is no jurisdictional wet- and actually on the property, the property i encumbered by the maximum setback allowed by the City ordinance. Also, the only wetland area remaining, around which the buffer has been placed, ads to be non - jurisdictional. PLC's data on ve g etatian alone shows the questionable area to be missing one of the three mandatory parameters and to be non- wetland. It would be a hardship to require W. Winiecki to lose art entire construction season to undertake an extensive hydrologic stud on property he goes not o when Y P Pe�Y �, data is already available that demonstrates its non - jurisdictional status; Lastly, the quality of the wetland lobe around which the 100-foot tuffer is designated does not by itself meet - the definition of a Class 1 wetland. Its Cl' 1 designation is apparently the result of being cor ected to a larger Class 1 wetland system off -site a substantial distance to the south. An evaluation of the q uestionabli wetland area itself using the RVI14WD funct ions and values methodology would result in a classification lower than Class I with a resultant narrower buffer zone. Page 4 13 1 We propose that a variance be approved allowing the buffer zone ed a along the western bound to be revised to 55 feet which would p ro p erty � � ut it at. the! edge of the existing P spoil file on the site. This would have no adverse affect on the ques 'onable wetland that the buffer P rotects since there would be vily no change in water utility or erosion of the wetland. The very imited wildlife habitat value being provided Eby the buffer in this zy , area would. have no meaningful adverse impact on local wildlife poptilations. The current buffer area is highly disturbed from 'past ditching and grading activi and is not an area of high wildlife use nor is it rare or valuable wildlife habitat. AftsmaiYas Even though the .portion of the buffer zone where project impacts w .uld take place is not providing buffer functions, the project p roposer. did consider several ilternative desi ns in . P 8 . P 1 P P ,g an attempt to nu mmize buffer encroachment. The building was mov V from its originally planned location, along the southwest property boundary to a loca along the north ro bound This minimized the degree of encroachment into'the boildn P PAY azY 8 setback and buffer zone from approximately a 40 -foot encroachment along hid entire length of the building. to a 15 -foot encroachment of the southwestern comer of the 6buildin 8 8 The two access roads are needed on either side of the building so thit large semi tractors pulling trailers can easily and safely enter and exit the site and can maneuver within the site when backing up to loading docks. cc: Frank Winiecld, General Sprinkler Pat Conrad, Rarnsey- Washington Metro Watershed District Page 5 14 Attachment 6 WETLAND SETBACK VARIANCE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Frank Winiecki of General Sprinkler Corporation applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance. WHEREAS, this variance applies to property on the south side of County Road D, east of Highway 61. The legal description is: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 525 WHEREAS, Section 36- 196(h)(3) of the wetland protection ordinance requires a 100 -foot -wide wetland buffer. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 40-foot -wide wetland buffer. WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 60 feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1. On November 18, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this variance. 2. The city council held a public hearing on December 9, 1996. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property . p Y owners as . required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described variance for the following reasons: 1. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District has classified the adjacent wetland as a Class 1 wetland —the most significant wetland type. The proposed variance would not be excessive and would still protect the wetland, which is the intent of the ordinance. 2.. The applicant has shown that strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property and not created by the ro ert owner. Undue p p Y hardship means the owner or developer cannot put the property to a reasonable use if the city denies the variance. The 100 -foot -wide wetland buffer requirement would make development of this site difficult. The wetland ordinance created the difficulty and the proposed variance is not excessive. 3. The proposal offers protection to the wetland for wildlife habitat and aesthetic enhancement, which are also functions of a wetland buffer. 15 Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Submitting a certificate of survey for the area that shows the location of: a. The ditch and wetland to.the south and east of the site. b. The ditch and wetland to the west of the site. C. All property tines. d. County Road D and any existing utilities. e. The existing: culverts for the ditches on either side of the site. f. The location, size and species of any large a trees on the site. 2. Submitting a grading and landscaping plan for the perimeter areas of the site between the driveways and parking lot and the wetland edge (including the wetland buffer). This plan shall be subject to the requirements of the city staff and the Ramse Y 9 - Washin ton Metro Watershed District. 3. Dedicating a wetland - buffer easement. This easement shall be re ared b a land p p Y surveyor, shall describe the boundary of the buffer and shall rohibit an building, P Y g g, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. The applicant shall record the deed for this easement before the city will issue a building permit. 4. Follow the site plan date- stamped November 1, 1995, subject to an changes required b Y 9 q y city staff or the community design review board - (CDRB). 5. Accepting responsibility for any necessary maintenance and upkeep of the ondin area and any sump catch basins. p p p 9 The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1995, 16 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD :B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 18,1996 B. Wetland Setback Variance -- General Sprinkler Corporation (County Road D) The staff report was presented by Ken Roberts, associate planner. Mr. Roberts answered .questions from the commissioners. He said a survey is required to verif the accuracy q fy Y of the drawing submitted by Mr. Winecki. Mr. Winecki's consultant will set the wetland edge where he thinks it is. Then it will probably be surveyed by Mr. Winecki's surveyor who will forward that information to the watershed district. The watershed district then will check it. In the future the watershed district will be reviewing commercial submittals but will not be doing he initial work for g the application. Cliff Aichinger, administrator of the watershed district, answered questions. He described the their role as an "offer of assistance" to property owners in the district. The watershed staff marks a conservative wetland determination of an area. if the applicant does not care to accept this delineation, he can hire his own consultant to reassess the wetland area. Based on information submitted from this consultant, the watershed district will then review their determination. Mr. Aichinger said the general definition of wetland in Minnesota is that the water has to be within 12 inches of the surface during two weeks of the rowin season ( mid - May ) . � g The applicant, Frank Winiecki, said he was comfortable with the staff recommendations. Staff emphasized that Mr. Winieckiwas not being asked to do anything that would not be Yt 9 required of q any other developer requesting this type of variance. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend: Adoption of the resolution which approves a 60 -foot wetland buffer variance for the proposed General Sprinkler Corporation building on County Road D, east of Highway 61. The city should approve this variance because: 1. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District has classified the adjacent wetland as a Class 1 Wetland—the most significant wetland type. The proposed variance would not be excessive and would still protect the wetland, which is the intent of the ordinance. 2. The applicant has shown that strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property and not created by the property owner. Undue hardship means the owner or developer cannot put the property to a reasonable use if the city denies the variance. The 100- foot -wide wetland buffer requirement would make development of this site difficult. The wetland ordinance created the difficult and the Y proposed variance is not excessive. 3. The proposal offers protection to the wetland for wildlife habitat and aesthetic enhancement, which are also functions of a wetland buffer. Planning Commission Mi n utes of 11 -18 -96 Approval is subject to the applicant or owner doing he follow* 9 1. Submitting a certificate of survey or the area • Y ea that shows the location of: a. The ditch and, wetland to the south and east of the site. b. The ditch and wetland to the west of the site. c. All property lines. d. County Road D and any existing utilities. e. The existing culverts for the ditches on either side of the site. f. The location, size and species of an large trees on the site. Y 9 2. Submitting a grading and landscap plan for the rim • p 9 p perimeter areas of the site between the driveways and parking lot and the wetland edge (including the wetlan This. 9 d buffer). .plan shall be subject to the requirements of the city staff and the Ramse - Washin W Y gton Metro Watershed District. I Dedicating a wetland - buffer easement. This easement shall be re `ared a p p and surveyor., shall describe the boundary of the buffer and shall prohibit an buildi fillip or dumping Y g� g, cutting,. g p ng ithin the buffer. The applicant shall record the deed for this easement before the city will issue a building permit. 4. Follow the site plan date- stamped November 1 1996 subjec ' j ct to any changes required by city staff or the community design review board (CDRB). g 5. Accepting responsibility for any necessary aintenance and upkeep rY p p of the ponding area and any sump catch basins. Commissioner Ericson seconded. Ay The motion passed. G -3 Action by Council MEMORANDUM Endorsed,..� Modified........., TO: City Manager :Rey ect od.- ,h.... FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner Date SUBJECT: Wetland - Buffer Width Variance, Conditional Use Perriifand Design Review — Maplewood Imports Addition LOCATION: 2780 North Highway 61 DATE: November 19, 1996 INTRODUCTION Project Description Brian Rathke, of Ryan Companies, is proposing to build a 9,957 - square -foot addition onto the South side of Maplewood Imports, 2780 North Highway 61. Refer to pages 9 -11. The purpose of.the addition is to provide for a new- vehicle delivery area, service write -up area, showroom, offices and customer waiting area. The applicant would add parking spaces as well. These would be added towards the rear of the site. Part of this new parking area would be on an existing graveled area and partly on an undeveloped area. Requests The applicant is requesting approval of the following: 1. A wetland -buffer width variance. The city code requires an average of a 100 -foot -wide wetland buffer to the rear of this site by an adjacent wetland. The code allows this buffer to .. be as narrow as 50 feet in places. The applicant proposes as little as a zero- foot -wide buffer next to part of the wetland. Refer to the map on page 11 and the Fetter on pages 13 -14. 2. A conditional use permit (CUP) to add onto the building since the addition would be closer than 350 feet to a nearby residential district. The proposed addition would be 152 feet from the residential zone to the south. Refer to the map on page 11 and the letter on page 17. 3. Design approval of the architectural and site plans. DISCUSSION Wetland Buffer Variance The applicant has considered three alternative designs in an attempt to make this project work, as the letter on pages 13 -14 indicates. These are: (1) avoid expansion towards the "finger" portion of the wetland and add parking to the south towards the residential neighbors; (2) fill the "finger" portion of the wetland under a provision of the Wetland Conservation Act, and (3) the current proposal which would preserve the ufinger" but would have grading up to its edge. Alternative Three, the applicant's proposal, is the best alternative. As the applicant's letter explains, expanding the site to the south towards the home owners would impact these neighbors the most. Some of the neighbors are already worried that there may be negative affects on their property values and disruption • ro proposal. It i of their neighborhood with the app licant's . p p s unlikely that neighbors would be !ea homes. The other alternative pleased if the project crept closer to their ative is equally bad, but from an environmental Aichinger, of the Ramsey-Washington perspective. Cliff g Metro Watershed District, stated that he the wetland. woul a narrowed wetland buffer than see the Foss o f d rather see The applicant's plan is a reasonable compromise to the city's wetland buffer requirements. As With the Lexus proposal, they would rovide ' p an improved buffer next to the "finger" with pretreatment areas to filter the arkin I i p got runoff prior to discharge into , the wetland. Another consideration is that the ' " e finger appears to have been created b the existing parking lot in the past and is not of a higher quality . Y grading of the y as is the main bod of wetland. ' has created a hardship for the property ert « � Y This p p Y owner since the finger must be treated. as a Class even though- it has l esser characteristics. Mr. II wetland - "finger" is of a le Aichinger has stated that, even though this "fin g lesser quality and appears man made he is s • g ' � till compelled to consider it as a Class II wetland since it drains into the main wetland body. Conditional Use Permit The proposed expansion meets the criteria eria for a CUP. The owners of one neighboring g g household, however, had two concerns. The the suggested that the building expansion o east or the north. There is no room no g p occur to north of the building to expand and ex ansion to On primary reason for th p the east would hide the addition from the front. e addition is to create a showroom for Mercedes. Showrooms need visibility from the street. Their second concern was about any potential negative affect ffect on their property alue. T y County Assessor's office has explained that y he neighboring property p there would not be any negative impact on the nei g g p perty values. The site is already developed a p Y p and there would not be any further encroachment towards the south other than the existing pavement. proposed addition will extend 153 feet closer p Granted, the oser to the neighbors than the existing buildin . However, the nearest house to the south g would still. be 51.2 feet away. Consequently, ther would not be any negative affect on property values e . . Neighbors' Concerns 1. Would the shoreland protection require • of hard -surf q ements be met regarding the maximum amount ace permitted? The shoreland protection ordinance req uires that the applicant not exceed 50% of their w q Property th impervious material (building, as halt or uiremen# sin p c oncrete). The applicant is meeting q since their impervious surface coverage would o this re re -tr g not exceed 40 /o and also since they would provide a the Pre-treatment method for storm runoff before the drain e wetland. age enters 2 2. Would the neighbors be inconvenienced in any way? The neighbors would be able to hear the sound of the construction as it takes p lace. After completion, however, there would not be any foreseeable disturbance from Maplewood Imports. . 3. There should not be any driveway access allowed to Kohiman Avenue. Access to Kohiman Avenue is not proposed. The applicant would Continue to use their present driveways at the frontage road. 4. Would any residential properties be depleted? This proposal would not eliminate or deplete any existing houses or residential properties. 5. The applicant should provide a visual and noise buffer for the adjacent home owners to the south. The landscaping and screening ordinance requires screening where a parkin lot is constructed next � g single- or to property that is used or shown on the city's land use plan for si double- dwelling use. This does not apply to the applicant's proposal. The north end of the property at 1263 Kohiman Avenue abuts Maplewood Imports site. This lot, however, is planned and zoned as M -1 (light manufacturing). Though there is a house on the south end of the lot, this house is 512 feet away from the proposed parking lot. It is difficult to conclude, therefore, that the north end of this lot is used residentially. Design Considerations Building Design, Roof - Equipment Screening and Trash Storage The building design is attractive. On November 12, the community design review board waived the requirement for the screening of any new roof -top mechanical equipment. The CDRB required that the applicant paint the new units to match the building as required b the code. The CDRB felt q Y t that screening would be more noticeable than the e nt and it eventually quipme becomes unsightl The CDRB also felt that trash dumpster screening was not needed for the containers behind the building. They observed, however, that the applicant stored cardboard and wooden pallets on the north side of the building. The CDRB required that the applicant keep this area clean. They directed staff to monitor this area for tidiness. Additional screening may be required when the CUP is reviewed in one year if a problem persists. Parkin The number of parking spaces proposed would meet code requirements. The code requires q q s 161 spaces — the applicant is proposing 190. Site L, iq_hts The code requires that new site lights be designed or aimed so that they do not shine into any residential neighbors' windows or onto a public street. 3 COMMITTEE ACTION November 12,1996: The CD R !m ort , B approved the building design • p s proposed expansion. g sign and site plans for Maplewood p November 1'8, 1996: The Ian recommended a variance and p n ing commission the CUP, pproval of the wetland buffer RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution beginning on page 18. This resolution a buffer variance for the proposed a pproves a 50 -foot wetland p p ed parking lot expansion of Ma nd_ Approval i Maplewood Imports pp s based on the following findings: p at 2780 North Highway 61. A g gs: 1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue ' . The hardship because of circumsta Y e hardship is cau ed b an of nces unique to the property. evolved into slow- qualit wetlan y d excavation on the site which wetland y d. Due to its connection to a la , the property owner would be r rge, higher- quality equired, by code, to provide a 50-foot setback. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent applicant would improve the ualit nt of the ordinance, since the runoff rior # quality of the wetland buffer b the re- p o its discharge into the wetland. y p re-tr eatment of storm A pproval is subject to the applicant ' pp doing the following: 1. Submitting a grading nd lan ' and g dscaping plan subject to the re ' the .Ramsey- V1/ashington Metro quirements Of the city staff Watershed District for the wetland .buffer. 2. Dedicating awetland -buff • wetland-buffer easement. This easement shall descr' the buffer and prohibit an build' ibe the boundary-of Y Ong, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping � The applicant shall record the g ping within the buffer deed for this easement before permit. the city will issue a building 3. Accepting responsibility for any necessary basins y y maintenance and u and any ponding areas or. infiltration pkeep of the sump catch ration ditches. E3• Adopt the resolution beginning ermit t0 g n g on page 20. This resolution a r p expand the auto dealership at 2 pp oyes a conditional use the adjacent residential p 780 North Highway 61 to be closer dential district. This permit is based than 350 feet to sed on the standards requ and is subject to the following conditions: i Y ordinance 1 All construction shall follow the. site plan approved b the city. ' development may approve minor chang Y• The director of com munity Y 2. The proposed construction mu • mus be started within one ear of co ' permit shall end. The council ma e Y uncil approval or the y e xtend this deadline for one Y ear. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4 C. Approval of the plans date - stamped September 27, 1996 for the building and parking lot expansion of Maplewood Imports, 2780 North Highway 61. Approval is subject to the property owner doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall dedicate and record a wetland -buffer easement. This easement shall describe the boundary of the buffer and prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. 3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Paint all proposed roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property. The color must match the building color. (code requirement) b. Aim or shield all exterior site lights as required by code so they are not a nuisance to any neighbors. 4. Keep the trash storage and dumpster areas clean and picked up. If a problem develops, the city may require additional dumpster space and /or an enclosure at the time of future conditional use permit reviews. 5. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 150 % of the cost of the unfinished work. 6. This approval does not include the signs. Signage will be reviewed by staff through the sign permit process. 7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 5 CITIZENS' COMMENTS l surveyed the surrounding property owners within 350 feet for their comment about this proposal. Of the 47 questionnaires mailed, I received six in favor, two were opposed, four had no Comment and four neighbors submitted miscellaneous comments. In Favor 1. They are good neighbors — No problems. (Trepanier, 2170 6th Street North St. Paul ) 2. The 61 frontage should be all commercial. (D &R Development Co., 2688 Maplewood Drive) ) 3. 1 am in favor, however, adding a wood privacy fence and landscape trees would add a visual and noise buffer to both residents and Maplewood Imports. (Murphy, 1287 Kohlman Avenue) 4. Businesses are good for the tax base of our community. (Baden, 2973 Beebe Parkway) 5. They are good neighbors. (Andersen, 1324 Kohlman Avenue) 6. l am in favor because it does not involve me in an way and it is a nice site for m Y Y y neighborhood. (Tucci, 1293 Kohlman Avenue) Opposed 1. We don't need to expand any more car dealerships! Leave the land be - It doesn't have to be developed!! (Wright, 2684 English Street) 2. An acceptable change would be to expand to the east or north of the building. Also, what, if any, impact would this have on property values and taxes? Renter- Swanson 1308 Kohlman Avenue) Miscellaneous Comments 1. No opinion except the following question: Does the proposed development meet the watershed criteria for percent of hardened surfaces versus open round? (Kliethermes, g 2720 Maplewood Drive) 2. I have no objection unless residential land owners are being inconvenienced. If any residents are affected in a negative way we will most certainly object to this plan. Rhame 1244 Kohlman Avenue) 3. I. do not object as long as they do not plan to seek entry or exit access from Kohlman Avenue now or in the future. (Buesing, 1247 Kohlman Avenue) 4. 1 could debate both pros and cons of this issue, however, as long as residential property isn't depleted any more than it already has within that area (demolishing duplex for ABRA ) I am in favor of growing small businesses. (Dorle, 2725 Clarence Street) 0 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 8.31 acres Existing Land use: Maplewood Imports SURROUNDING LAND USES North: KSTP Radio Station South: Don's Auto Body and single dwellings which front on Kohlman Avenue West: Maplewood Drive (Highway 61) East: Undeveloped property (wetlands) .PAST ACTIONS Maplewood Imports November 6, 1969: The city council approved plans for the original building. July 19, 1979: The council approved a CUP for a 3,900- square -foot shop addition. June 8, 1987: The council approved CUP for a 1,740 - square -foot car wash addition. May 23, 1988: The council reviewed the CUP and approved it for an indefinite term. Projects with Wetland Issues February 26, 1996: The city council approved a 75 -foot wetland setback variance for the new Lexus dealership on Highway 61. Code required 100 feet. Lexus was required to provide a "improved, quality" buffer in lieu of the poor - quality 100- foot -wide buffer that existed. On June 17, 1996 the planning. commission first reviewed a proposal by Frank Wienicki, of General Sprinkler Corporation, for a wetland buffer width variance. Mr. Wienicki was proposing to provide as little as a ten- foot -wide buffer (the code required 100 feet) on his site north of the new Lexus dealership. The planning commission considered revisions to this proposal on July 1.5, September 16 and again on October 7, 1996. They tabled this review each time to give the Mr. Wienicki a chance to improve the plans and provide a wider buffer with less impact on the wetland. Mr. Wienicki is currently proposing a revised site plan which will soon be scheduled for planning commission review. PLANNING Land use plan designation and zoning: M -1 (light manufacturing) Ordinance requirements: M -1 7 Ordinance Requirements Section 36- 187(b) requires a CUP for any building or exterior use, except parking, in a M -1 district that would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district. Section 36- 196(h)(3) of the wetland protection ordinance requires a 100- foot -wide wetland buffer, with a minimum buffer width of 50 feet, for the proposed parking lot expansion. Criteria for CUP Approval Section 36- 442(x) states that the City council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. Refer to .the findings in the resolution on pages 20 -23. Criteria for Variance Approval State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship ", as used in Conn ection with the granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is die to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the .landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. p:sec4lmapimpor.cup Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Hazelwood Land Use Plan 3. Property Line /Zoning Map 4. Site Plan 5. Applicant's Variance Justification Dated November 6, 1996 6. Exhibit A — Parking Lot Setback from Wetland Edge 7. Exhibit B — Alternative Parking Layout Extending to the South 8. Applicant's CUP Narrative Statement Dated September 24, 1996 9. Variance Resolution 10. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 11. Plans date - stamped September 27, 1996 (separate attachment) 0 Attachment 1 _. VADIVAIS ' HE►GHrs it J.! �l j ti 2. 1. SUMMIT CT. -•.I �. 3. �I YC aR. sr G = 4. LYDIA ST. , *S BEAM AVE. o 19 BEAM f W - 19 C Mcrkhcm Koh hnan r Pon Game lAJ Lake "''� Q KOHLMAN AVE. z J COUNTY ROAD C W Q I �u CIR 3 SE�cRFST DR PALM Yk, E7; @ tg A 4 WALMLLf DR A► V. 5 M OR CT. P �'°"� Ate.. � � N rn AVE. AVE, DEMONT � � AVM @ o ` OOKS AVE. W?OOKS � qw j KS AVE. CT. SEX TANT our A�1T All& Al. t GER1tAIS AVE. >. GERVAIS per; GRANDYIEW AVE. e VW NG DR SHERREN AVE. K c e v od Lake "COPE AVE. � avow i 1' IrARK• KING DR. Keller ...� AVE. LARK o t°k° co. < R . `� � ` D .v � LAURIE � RD. i��r�oe LAU c W 8 � 1. � W E pow* LAURIE CT. , r c LELAND RD. o Ix URST AVE. Iz ` ' - dUNC710N AW. ' WRKf Cr. e t; Co. `BURKE V � � _ PW* (1) AVE. 6uRKE Al CHAMBERS ST (1 aJRKE � ELDRiDGE AY . E1.OR A t�hrteM BE LMONT �,A [INRNONT AVE. SKILLMAN A ow SKILL AV E. Suu M� � KENW OOD AVE. HARRIS AVE. 4 ' • ROSEWOO '00 000 LOCATION MAP 9 4 N Attachment 2 interchange interchange principal arterial 694 Vadnais Heights OS R j BC ma'jo Co. Rd. p cgllQclor ■ O ■ — M. 1 0. CD ' � �.i C■ � BC t'tS V I L major collector ■ O , mom I MAPiE wo00 r , ■ � � � M A+l BC i ./I, minor arterial ' r� 4 - - �_ IaI - � B R1 - � OS a 3 ; 1 R--3(M LBC c R y Jr v CO:�d. C r.;'collec'tor- - :fr. -- II t r 1 PAX, :- - -A =1 `=' _ .�� FS - -; - Kim i T „ pS OS P%O R- t0 7. H ^ [ major collector " - - -- �� .L / O i • ••_ • 1 ._.? w F ff� i �� t ! LBC _ G 1 i mat rte -vial ►- Highway 6 — ......... y ! i inter ha ge ri r � •� f O V a. > i C N V W Q V .,, 0) O c» O , ` m O d O •- E 3 HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN ,o 4 N Attachment 3 I Q N _Yv ee Se c- 3 a ;oo �l e� / 3 I S (5.126c) (3-s?C&C) , �, p. '� � 3b I 9 e' � � 8.6 Jac � ` s2 03.' BATTER !SR OAOC -AST ItVCs CQ• / 39S. Z S4 4 AL 95 N ?5 a .� v 496 f / ale. %Wft i if EXISTING BUILDING r i WETLAND EDut N. 8 $. Co . v ::::::.•M PROPOSED ADDI c m Q►7 O iz_ A 3 - *9 0-vo v® DON AUTO BODY 1 4 � • 1 p . ``• 3 5 J1 I O COMMERCIAL BUILDINGIT* � ! �, � � .5 1 ,_ 1 7 8 4'} �1 �" N 8. L L � 011 N 4 13 O C42 !43) ('�4) 66 46 -KO H' 0 . A77 o •; o C f � 4 so• •b. rat I '` t I X74 oo C7 _N N N ❑ Q I f _ A . -; X03.4 t i 4 69 I • �oit. 13 1 ✓� xrr N C1 ool N _ �zs 0 71 .7o — ZD I 00 KOHLMAN so amp so C PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP MAPLEWOOD IMPORTS SITE ti t Attachme 4 �i.. mow'• YiA. Mw•IM•r•.•w «.•.wr.....w........ •..._ .n «M ..• 7..N ....w .•. _ Won at"wo WALL ' .. r .o.. ...._ x t� NG - f•' » i EXISTI .mot. t _ rOM.�I" ' • � ' t MAPLEW OOD IMPORTS / BUILDING O s' v •,;.•• , of '• is . '% ?I?!Z:.W!.•`. ± ! � 1, . Q 1 'r ::.:.PROPOSED ADDITION' •� wag t,': •` ' ~ tw wi le M 1 f •. !1/IM0tM611011 CURB we wft 3 is 1 1 1 1 SITE PLAN 12 4 N November 6, 1996 Attachment 5 CIVIL ENGINEERING • URBAN PLANNING • TRANSPORTATION • ENVIRONMENTAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITE • CO NSTR UC TION MANAGEMENT • LAND SURVEY NARRATIVE STATEMENT FOR VARIANCE APPLICATION Maplewood Imports 2780 Maplewood Drive The property under the current ownership of LeJeune investment, Inc. totaling 8.31 acres is a combination of M-1 zoning and Residential zoning districts.. The dealership has been operating for 27 years and owned by LeJeune Investment for three years who have maintained close communications with the adjacent property owners and residential properties. Maplewood Imports is proposing an expansion to their facilities to obtain a new Mercedes line of vehicles. The proposed site expansion is being held to the minimum number of stalls to adequately support the existing and proposed showrooms. The site location and request to expand the building and parking lot will require a Conditional Use Permit and a Variance to section 9 -196 wetland and stream. The following sanative focuses on the variance request and why the request is the most reasonable solution for parking lot expansion. The site fills within the Kholman lake shoreland ordinance which requires a maximum impervious development of 50% if drainage is pretreated, Along the eastern side of the site is a wetland basin identified as a Maplewood class 2. The eastern wetland has two components. The main body of the wetland and an appendage ( finger) that extends west toward Maplewood Imports. The finger appears to have been created by the grading of the existing parking lot at some past period. The grading directed drainage to this area and overtime wetland characteristics appeared. This wetland acts as a cleaning buffer for the main wetland body. A wetland evaluation of this finger indicates it has characteristics of a class S wetland. The Maplewood Code 9 -196 wetland &streams does not allow a wetland boundary to have multiple classiScations within one wetland edge. The expansion request of Maplewood Imports to put their property to a reasonable use has attempted to balance the factors of overall impervious site coverage, and not to expand the commercial nature of the business toward the residential properties to the south. Maplewood Imports proposes to eland their parking lot in the direction of the wetland. The existing paved and gravel areas will be resurfaced with curb aad gutter to control the drainage to sump catch basins. The sump catch basins will involve a rock infiltration trench to pre-treat drainage from the existing and additional paved surfaces. An existing drainage pipe that discharges directly to the wetland will be r moved. The proposed parking lob will encroach into the buffer setback at the loca#ion of the westerly tip of the wetland finger. The specific variance request is for a reduction in the SO' minimum distance of the buffer in the area of the wetland finger. The buffer at the western end of the wetland finger would be zero during construction aad approxitaately 18' at the canclusion of construction. Buffer setback for the remaining wetland boundary will exceed the SO'minimum distaace and will average 110'. (see exhibit A) This average exceed the 100' average distance specified in the ordinance. (612) 933 -0972 • 6110 Blue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 • FAX (612) 933 -1153 13 Throughout the site design process alternative designs were review which include, filling a part of the wetland appendage or reconfiguring the parking lot to avoid encroachment into the buffer Yazd. To reconfigure the parking lot would require developing the parking lot to the south. (see. exhibit B) This parking lot configuration would impact the southerly neighbors, by moving the parking lot up to 100' closer to the homes. Maplewood Imports has continued to - work with the neighbors by mowing or not mowing different areas of their property per the neighbors requests. A southerly expansion would impact existing trees that currently screen the dealership for some of the neighbors. Maplewood Imports has been proactive in kceping good relations with the neighbors and feels that creating a pazlang lot closer to the resident homes is not a viable option. It is believed that the proposed location for the parking will create less of a environmental and social unpact, being in the buffer, than removing the stand of trees with the southerly expansion. The southerly parking option also would require a zoning change as part of the expansion would be in a residential zee. Under current wetland Conservation Act regulations filling of up to 2000 square feet of wetlands is permissible. If the appendage was filled the minimum buffer setback could be met.. Filling a wetland to meet the minimum buffer setback requirement is not a desirable or attractive alternative. By controlling the drainage with curb and gutter and sump catch basins existing erosion will be reduced. Small rains and initial water from larger storms will infiltrate the water table through the rock trenches. The northerly catch basins will control drainage from the existing uncontrolled parking area and reduce the amount of erosion to the wetland. The southerly catch basin will control drainage from areas that are currently paved and unpaved. The overflow drainage will discharge through the wetland appendage before reaching the main wetland. All of the proposed new paving is being directed to the southerly catch basin and the wetland finger. All disturbed Bound including the 3:1 slope will be seeded with a watershed approved native seed mix that will enhance and improve the buffer in those areas. These proposed changes should ;improve the water quality to the wetland finger and ultimately to the main wetland body. As an existing business within Maplewood, Maplewood imports has the opportunity to obtain a new Mercedes line of vehicles. The ownership, development team, City staff and watershed have worked diligently. on producing a plan which is sensitive to the wetlands and balances neighbor concerns. The plan will improve the overall water quality, Plant material/ground ever around the wetland and maintain the cun�ent distance between a commercial use and residential property. The ownership of Maplewood Imports request approval of the Planning Commission and City Council of this buffer yard variance as the best alternative to balance the competing site constraints at Maplewood Imports. 14 Neer 6,1996 - 2" NARRATIVE Attachment 6 Z O o cow -wg i fo o N Q � w C 0 - ,. Z IM o X 0 cc - Q o.. L16 LU W N W W O M o • W W - .- r- .- N N O V x W No1* 16'OOOW - �- - 335 -}4' o • M Cat M O 9, r LO A �-+ :v Ln ._°; to Cn Q� C 13 '- ... ��vr �'w.' .. _ - .��+.� �'+bDL "•'.'.'s'�. .....S"8:.�v.' :�. 'y':' ' _ . �aa S ft 4 1 ..l �� EXPANSION I uE 5 9W 94KRM 9937 S0. FT. t FM 976.00 ` 5 W,SM , 3 3 1 t X� sotro MMN !.•'� 1 Y ¢ ?i � 11 '-ApprowncLie NOV 1 A' 4p 4L 40 S Z on � r1 1 • _ ,� .. 1Q-- I— 1 96 AR. E 16 EXt 1 40 esi ners Eil 1 t1 filar Ir, Itr Suite pp ���i� Minnetonka. Mt! usldslz 11.astitr� Rela tionsjil� S � 9u:l U s RILK .AN 5534 i iarwanrCoon 90 irt A� Sur lSNOVAN bW 400"M I L N..Y N a Opers EXIST "O 168 So FFE 975.50 Attachment 7 20 -8512 CM 2 / - -�-- - [CC 0' O k SURNOUPtTA81.E CUR FWWRE i :DED --- - 8' C U►MUW FENCE i 12 1x �ti r R *2.5' i 14 E41- 10' TV"SMON AREA FROM 81:17 CLAS M SURMOUNT.AME CURS. .. i ! \- SURmOUNTAfnf CuRR PER i i i DO ..l �� EXPANSION I uE 5 9W 94KRM 9937 S0. FT. t FM 976.00 ` 5 W,SM , 3 3 1 t X� sotro MMN !.•'� 1 Y ¢ ?i � 11 '-ApprowncLie NOV 1 A' 4p 4L 40 S Z on � r1 1 • _ ,� .. 1Q-- I— 1 96 AR. E 16 EXt 1 40 esi ners Eil 1 t1 filar Ir, Itr Suite pp ���i� Minnetonka. Mt! usldslz 11.astitr� Rela tionsjil� S � 9u:l U s RILK .AN 5534 i iarwanrCoon 90 irt A� Sur lSNOVAN bW 400"M I L N..Y N a Opers EXIST "O 168 So FFE 975.50 Attachment 7 20 -8512 CM 2 / - -�-- - [CC 0' O k SURNOUPtTA81.E CUR FWWRE i :DED --- - 8' C U►MUW FENCE i 12 1x �ti r R *2.5' i 14 E41- 10' TV"SMON AREA FROM 81:17 CLAS M SURMOUNT.AME CURS. .. i ! \- SURmOUNTAfnf CuRR PER i i - - Attachment .8 Septeriber 24, 1996 NARRATIVE .STATEMENT FOR CONDITIONAL - USE APPLICATION Maplewood Imports The Pmpe1'tY owned by Le.Teune Tnvestitwnts currently is as auto dealership "Maplewood Imports" for Mercedes Benz, Audi, and Porsche; with a service deparanent. The elcisting :and proposed addWon is zoned M -1 Light Manufacturing. M -1 is de correct zoning without restrictions. All setbacks will mcet M -1 requirements. , T1e planned expansion will increase showroom floor and office. space with an indoor car droproff and pick -up area. Maplewood Code Sec. 36- 187(b) states, "No building or exterior use, elccept parking, maybe erected, altered or conducted within three hundred fifty (350) feet of a residential district without a Conditional Use Permit". It is estimated that the residartial zoning line is approximately 80 feet south of the southerly PioPert3' line. This locates the existing building 295 feet from the zoning . line and the prow b,ilainiz will be approximately ins fed from said tese line. The proposed meets the five criteria as stated in the Conditional Use Application. Furthermore, the closest residential building is located over 350 few from the .proposed building expansion. Thank you for your consideration of this Conditional Use request. 17. Attachment 9 VARIANCE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc, applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance. WHEREAS, this variance applies to property at 2780 North Highway 61. The Legal description is: Lots 97,98 and 99 of GARDENA ADDITIONAL OF RAMSEY COUNTY, Minnesota together with the west 1/2 of vacated English Street lying between the Easterly extension of the North line of said Lot 97 and Easterly extension of the South line of said Lot 99. The North 114 feet of Lots 16 and 17, KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The Northerly 300 feet of Lot 14 and all of Lot 15, KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota. At that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the South east, 1 /4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, which lies East of the Easterly right of way of Trunk Highway No. 61, and North of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point distant 531.75 feet West and 122 feet South of the Northeast corner of the above - described fraction of Section 4, thence running Northwesterly at a range of approximately 66 degrees, 28 minutes, from said point 107 feet, more or less to a point on the Easterly right of way line of said Highway No. 61, which said point is 90 feet Southwesterly from the point of intersection of said Easterly right of way line with the North line of said quarter- quarter - quarter section except that part platted as KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION. The North One -half of Lot Twelve (12) of KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota together with that part of vacated English Street lying within the SE 1/4 of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22 and lying between the Easterly extension of the North line of Lot 12, KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, and the Easterly extension of the South line of the North 1/2 of Lot 12,. KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION. The North 300 feet of Lot Thirteen (13) of KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The North Half (N 1/2) of Lot Eighteen (18), KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, together with an easement for ingress and egress over the West 10 feet of the South Half of Lot Eighteen (18), KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The North 335.00 feet of Lots 73 and 74, GARDENA ADDITION to Ramsey County, Minnesota; and the East 40 feet of English Street, vacated, lying between the Westerly extensions across said street of the North line of Lot 74 and the South line of the North 335.00 feet of Lot 74, all in GARDENA ADDITION to Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, Section 36- 196(h) (3) of the wetland protection ordinance requires a wetland buffer with an average width of 100 feet and a minimum width of 50 feet. 18 WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a buffer with a minimum width of zero feet. The average proposed buffer width would be 72 feet wide. WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 50 feet from the minimum buffer width requirement and .28 feet from the average buffer width requirement. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1. On November 18, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this variance. 2. The city council held a public hearing on , 1996. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required b law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and q Y present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described variance for the following reasons: 1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. The hardship is caused by an old excavation on the site which q 3 evolved into a low- quality wetland. Due to its connection to a large, higher - quality wetland, the property owner would be required, by code, to provide a 50- foot setback. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, since the applicant would improve the quality of the wetland buffer by the pre - treatment of storm runoff . prior to its discharge into the wetland. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1 Submitting a grading and landscaping plan subject to the requirements of the city staff and the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for the wetland buffer. 2. Dedicating a wetland -buffer easement. This easement shall describe the boundary of the buffer and an rohibit building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. p Y The applicant shall record the deed for this easement before the city will issue a building permit. 3. Accepting responsibility for any necessary maintenance and upkeep of the sump catch basins and any ponding areas or infiltration ditches. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1996. M Attachment 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ryan Construction Company applied for a conditional use permit to add onto an auto dealership building. The addition would be within 350 feet of a residential lot line. WHEREAS, this permit applies to Maplewood Imports at 2780 North Highway 61. The legal description is: Lots 97, 98 and 99 of GARDENA ADDITIONAL OF RAMSEY COUNTY, Minnesota together with the west 1/2 of vacated English Street lying between the Easterly extension of the North line of said Lot 97 and Easterly extension of the. South line of said Lot 99. The, North 114 feet of Lots 16 and 17, KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The Northerly 300 feet of Lot 14 and all of Lot 15, KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota. At that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the South east 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, which lies East of the Easterly right of way of Trunk Highway No. 61, and North of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point distant 531.75 feet West and 122 feet South of the Northeast corner of the above- described fraction of Section 4, thence running Nothwesterly at a range of approximately 66 degrees, 28 minutes, from said point 107 feet, more or less to a point on the Easterly right of way line of said Highway No. 61, which said point is 90 feet Southwesterly from the point of intersection of said Easterly right of way.line with the North line of said quarter - quarter- quarter section line except that part platted as KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION. The North .one -half of Lot Twelve (12) of KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota together with that part of vacated English Street lying within the SE 1/4 of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22 and lying between the Easterly extension of the North line of Lot 12, KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, and the Easterly extension of the South line of the North 1/2 of Lot 12, KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION. The North 300 feet of Lot Thirteen (13) of KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The.North Half (N 1/2) of Lot Eighteen (18), KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, together with an easement for ingress and egress over the West 10 feet of the South Half of Lot Eighteen (18), KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The North 335.00 feet of Lots 73 and 74, GARDENA ADDITION to Ramsey County, Minnesota; and the East 40 feet of English Street, vacated, lying between the Westerly extensions across said street of the North line of Lot 74 and the South line of the North 335.00 feet of Lot 74, all 'in GARDENA ADDITION to Ramsey County, Minnesota. 20 WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1 On November 18, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council. approve this permit. 2. On , the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 1, The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The . use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 10.There would not be a significant affect on the development of the parcel as zoned. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 21 3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1996. 22 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 18, 1996 VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Maplewood Imports, 2780 Highway 61 North --- Wetland Buffer -Width Variance and Conditional Use Permit Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts and Melinda Coleman, community development director, answered questions from the commission. David Dahlquist of RLK Associates, the site designer and engineer for the project, gave some history of this wetland :area. Mr. Dahlquist felt the 18 -20 foot slope buffer that would exist after construction would actually improve the vegetation from what it is now existing. g Commissioner Rossbach asked why a rocked trench was planned instead of a retention pond. Mr. Dahlquist felt the trench was adequate for this size development. Ken Haider, public works director, said there wasn't an average time frame before ponds needed to be dredged. He said there hasn't been a need to dredge. any of these ponds after construction was completed in a development. Mr. Haider thought it would be a significant length of time (tens of years ) before a pond Would need dredging. Mr. Rossbach said he was concerned with looking for a way to improve the quality of water before it enters the wetland. Mr. Dahlquist said the drainage lines are not changing and he felt the grass in front of the building acts as a filtration area before the water gets into the Swale. Since there is no curb in this area of the parking lot, the water would flow unto the 9 rass area and be cleansed somewhat before entering the culvert. Mr. Dahlquist affirmed that the water would go. directly to the ditch area and not through catch basins. He said elbows would act as skimmers to keep grease and oil from going into the sump . pumps. _ Doug Molder, of Maplewood Imports, spoke about the speaker system and lights at the dealership. Mr. Dahlquist pointed out that most of the site was already paved and that the addition of sump catch basins and trenches was an improvement to the existing conditions. He said an open water pond would be an alternative measure. This was not planned for economic reasons and because they wanted to stay out of the buffer area. Brian Rathke with Ryan Companies commented that, if soil borings were done and found that the soils would not provide suitable drainage, they then would consider excavating and providing bedding material. He said the owners have evaluated the options and considered the concerns and interests of the neighbors. Commissioner Rossbach thought the "prudent choice would be to require a retention pond. He said it is a better water - treatment system, and it is known how it works. Mr. Haider said a retention pond would cause significant disruption, i.e. perhaps excavation and bermin 9 , within Planning Commission Minutes of 11 -18 -96 the. buffer area. Cliff Aichinger of the Ramsey Washington Watershed District agreed that more ran � g granular materials could be substituted, as Mr. Rathke mentioned, so that the water could be better filtered before going into the water table. Commissioner Pearson moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a 50 -foot wetland buffer variance for the ro osed parking � P P p g lot expansion of Maplewood Imports at 2780 North Highway 61. Approval is based on the following findin 1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. The hardship is caused by an old excavation on the site which evolved into a low- quality wetland. Due to its connection to a large, higher- quality wetland, the property owner would be required, by code, to provide a 50 -foot setback. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, since the applicant would improve the quality of the wetland buffer by the re- treatment of storm runoff prior to its discharge into the wetland. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Submitting a grading and landscaping plan subject to the requirements of the city staff and the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for the wetland buffer. 2. Dedicating a wetland - buffer easement. This easement shall describe the boundary of the buffer and prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. The applicant shall record the deed for this easement before the city ill issue a building g permit. e. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit to expand the auto dealership at 2780 North 61 to be closer than 350 feet to the adjacent residential district. This permit is based on the standards required by ordinance and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one Y ear. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. Commissioner Kopesky seconded Ayes --- Ericson, Fischer, Frost, Kopesky, Pearson Nays — Rossbach The motion passed. Commissioner Rossbach said he voted against the motion because he didn't feel infiltration trenches were the appropriate method to work with the parking -lot water. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 12, 1996 B. Maplewood Imports Expansion, 2780 Highway 61 Maplewood Imports was represented by Doug Mulder of Maplewood Imports, Brian Rathke of Ryan Companies, Jerry Putnam of LHB Engineering and Architecture and David Dahlquist of RLK Associates. Mr. Dahl quist introduced the project and explained details about the request. Mr. Putnam answered the board's questions about the building materials and building design. The board was impressed with the building design. Boardmember Robinson, however, noted a problem with cardboard and wooden pallets stored in the open on the north side of the building. Mr. Mulder explained that this is the area where packaging materials are stored after weekly deliveries. Mr. Mulder said that this material is removed weekly. Staff suggested that this issue be. reviewed at the time of the one -year conditional use permit review to see if the property owner is keeping these materials out of site. After one year the city may require the construction of a new enclosure for this material. Boardmember Johnson moved the Community Design Review Board recommend: C. Approval of the plans date - stamped September 27, 1996 for the building and parking lot expansion of Maplewood Imports, 2780 North Highway 61. A rovaVis subject to the p p p � 9 Y pp J. property owner doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall dedicate and record a wetland- buffer easement. This easement shall describe the boundary of the buffer and prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. 3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Paint all proposed roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property. The color must match the building color. (code requirement) b. Aim or shield all exterior site lights as required by code so they are not a nuisance to any neighbors. 4. Keep the trash storage and dumpster areas clean and picked up. If a problem develops, the city may require additional dumpster space and /or an enclosure at the time of future conditional use permit reviews. 5. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or .. ........... o welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 150% of the. cost of the unfinished work. 6. This signs. pproval does not include the i na a will be reviewed b staff 9 g g y through the sign permit process. 7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may Y approve minor changes. Boardmember Robinson seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. CDRB 11 -12 -96 � -y MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Community Development Director SUBJECT: Antenna and Tower Ordinance DATE: .November 19, 1996 INTRODUCTION A ct I. en by C Ou.nc i / ll . Endorse Mo dif i e e i e e t e �..�.,.- Date On December 18, 1995, the city council adopted a one -year moratorium on towers and antennas. The moratorium allowed staff time to study where and how the city code should allow these facilities. The primary objectives of the zoning ordi are to protect adjacent land uses from possible adverse impacts and to regulate antennas and towers in a way that does not preclude their legitimate use. In addition, the moratorium prevented new towers and antennas from being constructed in Maplewood until the city adopts a new ordinance. BACKGROUND On October 21, 1996, the planning commission and several telecommunication industry representatives reviewed the first draft of the antenna and tower ordinance. The Commission and industry representatives suggested several changes to the proposed ordinance. On November 4, 1996, the planning commission and several telecommunication industry representatives reviewed the second draft of the antenna and tower ordinance. The Commission and industry representatives suggested several more changes to the proposed ordinance. City staff noted these suggestions and have made more changes to the proposed text. DISCUSSION Several telecommunication companies have approached Maplewood seeking permits to construct wireless telecommunications facilities. As proposed, the ordinance relates to cellular telephone towers, antennas and rooftop apparatus needed to operate for this rapidly changing technology. Staff modeled the ordinance after ordinances that Bloomington and Woodbury recently adopted. The League of Minnesota Cities developed model language and helpful direction, research and other inform from cities around the United States. This information has been very useful and staff has used some of this language in the proposed ordinance to fit the city's needs. Currently, there are six towers and associated facilities in the city. KSTP has two sites on the east and west sides of H ighway 81 and south of Beam Ave. They have five towers that are between five and six hundred feet tall. The other tower, which I believe belongs to AT &T, is located south of Highwood Avenue and west of Century Avenue. As proposed, new towers and antennas would be a permitted use on existing facilities, water towers, sides or roofs of buildings or structures over two stories and existing power or telephone poles. In all other districts and instances, the ordinance requires the owner to get a conditional use permit. City staff wrote the ordinance to allow towers in residential districts if the applicant can show the proposed tower location is necessary to meet the cellular telephone coverage and capacity that otherwise could not be served. The proposed ordinance restricts towers in residential districts to 75 feet in height. Some cities have prohibited towers altogether in residential districts. This approach may be at odds with the 1996 Federal Telecommunications Act. This law bars cities from actions that prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting personal wireless telephone services and facilities in their cities. COMMISSION ACTION On November 18, 1996, the planning commission recommended approval of the attached ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the ordinance starting on page 3. This ordinance establishes regulations about commercial use antennas and towers in Maplewood. Attachment: Proposed ordinance paordftwer.3 K ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE CITY CODE BY ADDING LANGUAGE ABOUT ANTENNAS AND TOWERS. The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: Section 1. This section changes Section 36 -66(b) by adding the following: (3) Antennas and towers as. regulated by Section 36 -606. ri. rlw. l�i�r.. r. r. rr��l. �. r� .r.r�.�r�.��.w�r■w. �i_ r�iq ....Ir.r�Ir..Irr�4.l•rr�r.�_ Section 2. This section changes Section 36 -84.7 as follows: (I have crossed out deletions and underlined the additions.) Section 36 -84.7 Radio tower, television antenna and flagpole setbacks. Citizen band radio towers amat eur radio towers television antennas. and fla oles in an R -1 district shall maintain a five -foot setback from all property lines. Section 3. This section adds the following to the Maplewood City Code: (Additions have been underlined.) CHAPTER 36 ARTICLE XI COMMERCIAL USE ANTENNAS AND TOWERS Section 36 -600. Purpose. To accommodate the communication needs of residents and business while protecting the public health ,.safety and general welfare of the community, the Maplewood City Council finds that these regulations are ,necessary to_ 1. Facilitate the p rovision of wireless telecommunication services to the residents and businesses of the cit, r�- rrri._r i 2. Minimize adverse visual effects of towers through careful design and siting standards. rr 3. Avoid potential damage to adiacent prop erties from tower failure through structural standards and setback requirements. 4. Maximize the use of existing and app roved towers and building for new wireless telecommunication antennas to reduce the number of towers needed to serve the c- =� 3 Goals in do t�_this ordinance include the following: 1. Minimize adverse visual effects of towers through careful design and siting standards. 2. Avoid potential damage to adiacent properties from tower failure through structural standards and , setback regu, irements. 3. Maximize the use of existin and approved towers and buildings new wireless telecommunications antennas to reduce the number of towers needed to serve the community. 4. Prom the use of public land. buildings and structures for - wireless communications whene p ossible. irrrr_.I.rw .I r�l_r_�_ 5. Freestanding mono Roles and towers shall be designed and installed .to encourage two co- locations of facilities on the same structure or on the same site. 6. The following references shall be followed when selecting sites: a. Primary structural location reference for wireless com munication a ui ment as permi tted uses. _ 01,E water towers. IQ Co- location on existing towers. J .3 1 Church steeples or the church structure when camouflaged as steeples, bell towers, or other architectural features. Sides and roofs of building s,o structures over two stones_ L 5 Existing �,power or telephone pole corridors. ._.le c Light poles or towers at outdoor recreational facilities. _ I.. �rr�r�irlr _r.r_�_Ir_I�.��I�r.r.q�rlr r..�_r__Ir•rr•.�_ Parking Lots may be used to locate monopoles where the structure replicate incorporates or substantially blends with the overall li htin standards and fixtures of .the garkinglot. b. Primary land use areas for monopoles requiring conditional use permits. Industrial. Government, school, church or places of worship, utility, and institutional sites. L31 Public parks /golf courses, when compatible with the nature of the dark or course. Open space areas when compatible with the nature of the area and site. Section 36 -601. Definitions. The followin words and terms.. when used in this section or ordinance shall have the foliowin meaning unless the context clead_indicates otherwise: 1. Accessory structure. A structure located on the tower or antenna site customarily incidental to the receivi . ng or transmitting of radio or television programs, radio and telephone receivin wave transmit/receive antennas designed for dispatching or use with household electronic equipment including "ham" radio equipment. 2. Antenna Thatportion,of any equipment located on the exterior or. outside any structure, used for transmitting or receiving radio or television waves. 3. An, t_ a, Cellular Telephone. A device consisting. of a metal, carbon fibre, or other electromagnetically conductive .rods or elements, usually arranged in a circular array on a single supporting pole or other structure and used for transmission and reception of radio waives in wireless telephone communications. 4. Antenna Public Utility Microwave. A parabolic dish or cornucopia sha ed electroma neticall reflective or conductive element used for the transmission and /or reception of point to point UHF or VHF radio waves in wireless communications and including - anv supporting structure. 5. Antenna Radio and Television Broadcast Transmittin A wire,. set.of_wires metal or carbon fibre rod.or other.electroma electromagnetic element used to transmit ublic or commercial broadcast radio or television ro rammin and includin the support structure. thereof. 6. Antenna Satellite Dish, A device incorporating a reflective surface that is solid-,open mesh or bar configured and is in the. shape of a shallow dish cone horn or cornucopia. Such a device shall be used to transmit and /or receive radio or electromagnetic waves between terrestrial! y and /or orbital l -based uses. This definition includes but is not limited to what are commonly known as satellite. earth stations,, TVROs television receive oni and satellite microwave antennas. 7. Antenna Short -wave Radio Transmittinq and Receiving. A wire set of. wires or a device consisting of a metal carbon fibre or other electromagnetically conductive element used for the transmission and reception of radio waves used for short -wave radio Communications and including the supporting structure thereof. 8. Public Utilit . Persons co oration or overnments su l in as electric trans ortation ..._ water, sewer, or land line telephone service to the public. For this ordinance, commercial wireless telecommunication. sources shall. not be considered public utility uses. 9. Tower. Any pole, spire, or structure or combination desi ned for attaching antennas and all supporting lines, cables, wires, braces and masts. Section 36 -602. Existing antennas and towers. Antennas towers and accesso structures in existence as of 1996 date of ordinance adoption) that do not meet or comply with this section are subject to the followin provisions:, 1. Towers may continue in use for the existing purpose now used and as now existing -but ma not be replaced or structurally altered without meetin all standards in this section. 2 If such towers.are damaged or destro ed due to any reason or cause at all, the user or owner voluntarily removes the tower the owner or o erator .ma re air and restore the tower to its former size height and use within one . year after first - getting a building ermit from the city. The location and 2hysical dimensions shall remain as they were before the damage or destruction. 5 Section .36 -603. Interpretation. It is not the intention of th s, rdina�to i_ nterfe_ re with, abrogate or annul any covenant or other ag, reement between parties. However, where this ordinance imposes ( greater restrictions upon the us.e or e remises for antennas or towers than are im osed or re uired b other. ordinances rules r ulations or permits, or by covenants or agreements,. the 12rovis ions of this ordinance shall g_ Section 36 -6.04. Inspections and Violations. a. All towers, monopoles, antennas and supporting structures _m obtain a building permit and are subject. to inspection bv the city buildin : official to determine. com liance with UBC construction standards. Deviations from the on inal construction that a p ermit is obtained other than antenna adiustments, is a misdemeanor. ■�.■..r�l r�..■....■ ■I II III I I ■ ICI_ I. 11��1■. r�. 1. r�... l._I_r.�l�lr��l..�lrll�q. -Ir._� Ir .■MI .I -�I.I I I��1�I�� b. Notice of violations. will be sent by registered mail to the owner and the owner will have thirt ( 30) . da'ys from the date the notification is issued to make rep airs. The. owner wi notify building official that the re airs have been made and as soon as ossible after that the buildina official will make another insp ection and. the owner n otified of the results. c. Adjustments or modifications to existing antennas do not -re uire a conditional use permit or a building -permit. Section 36 -605. Conditional Use Permit. a . In reviewing an app lication for a conditional use permit for the construction of commercial antennas towers monopoles and accessory structures the city council shall consider the: Standards in the city code, Il�n.l■Irlr_.wl��—__.�Il.rr Recommendations of the planning commission and community desig review board. L31 Effect of the p use upon the health safety, convenience and general of residents of surrounding ' areas, r. �r�r .rr-����■.u.rlr�ll-r.�u1_■�I I�� Effect on values, U Effect of the proposed use on the co mprehensive plan_ b. The applicant shall provide at the time .of application, sufficient information to show that construction and .installation of the antenna or tower wil meet. or'exceed the standards and .. r.r■_I ■r.l�+■.+r_.■ _w - _ I�.. .�Ir..lril�+l.�■II ^�.r��.�uw�_I Il�rr .r■+■r• ■I�.•w_I.r�lrrr +lr. i■ r. ll�. r-. Irrr■. �...Irrr�.r+++�ir.rlrrl.■.n.l req uirements of the r UBC (Uniform Building Code). Ilrlrrl.rrrrM.�M1��_I..�I�.. C. Conditional use permits will not be required for: Re air or re lacement or adjustment of the elements of an antenna array affixed to a tower or antenna, if the repair or replacement does not reduce the safety factor. fQ Antennas mounted on water towers sides or roof of existin structures and on existin towers, power, ,light_, or telephone. poles. d. The l fee to. be paid for the conditional use permit sha I be set by city council resolution. Section 36 -606. Cellular Telephone Towers Proposed in Residential Districts. No person, firm or corporation shall build or install _a tower or monopole ,in a resident al zone without obtaining a conditional use 2ermit. Such a tower or m_pol,�hall_be sub ec_t to , but not limited to, the following conditions: 1. The a2dicant shall demonstrate b - rovidin a coverage /interference. analysis and ca acit analy sis, that location of the .tower as 2roposed is necessary to meet the f r e ci uengy reuse a n d s2 acing needs of the cellular s stem and to p rovide adeguate portable cellular tele hone coverage and ca acit to areas that cannot be adeguately served by locating the antennas in a less restrictive district or on an existing structure, A tower. or antenna. . Ir. rll�l__�r.�ll_Arr- rrAlAl_A._I A llrl r.rYlrp�rr�r I AAA�1�1��_� 2. The antennas shall be located on an existing structure if . ossible and shall not extend more than twent -five 25 feet above the hei ht of the. structure to which. they are attached. 3. If no existin structure that meets the height re uirements for the antennas. is available for m ountin the antennas such antennas may be mounted_ on a monop not. to exceed sevent -five 75 feet in height. The mono ole shall be located a distance of at least the height of the monopole' from the nearest residential structure unless a qualified structural eng ineer specifies in writing that any colla se of the pole will occur within a lesser distance under all foreseeable circumstances and if the city council approves a lesser setback. 4. The height of a tower rnav be increased to a maximum .of one hundred 100 feet if the tower .is designed for the co- location of another 2rovider's antenna. Ir- �1_I_II I Iril -I��1 Illllrlr.�. -Ir. RArlr� .AAA ^�� 5. Transmitting receiving and switching a ui ment shall be in an existing structure whenever ossible. If anew a ui ment building is necessa for transmitting, receiviag and switchin the owner or op erator shall locate it at least ten 10 feet from the side or rear lot line and shall landscape and screen it. The community design review board shall review such a building, and the landscaping- and screening. Section 36 -607. Construction Requirements, Setback and Height Restrictions in Districts or Locations Other Than Residential. a. No 2 art of any tower or antenna shall be constructed located or maintained at an time p ermanently or temp orarily, in or upon any re uired setback area for the district in which the antenna or tower is to be located. b. All antennas towers and accesso structures shall meet all applicable provision s of this code and this section. c. Antennas and towers shall meet the following reguiremen_ #s: �• - I�Irr�A_IAAI_A�I Ilrr■ JD The antennas may be mounted on a single i3ole or m not to exceed one hundred sevent -five 175 feet in height. The pole shall be setback at least the height of the pole plus twenty -five (25) feet from any residential lot line. IA1_I�_I IAI�.�.rr.1 ..A__.r . r_IIAir•II��_Ir� X2,1 Metal towers and monopoles shall be constructed of, or treated with, corrosive resistant material. L31 The use of gu yed to wers is prohibited. 7* (4) Tower locations should provide the maximum amount of screenin,o- Rossible for off -site views of the facility LQ _Existing on -site vegetation shall be preserved to the max imum practicable extent. The installation shall be designed to be compatible with the underlying site plan. The owner or op erator shall landsca a the base of the tower and. an accesso . structures. Accessory structures and eg* uil2ment buildings shall be designed to be architectural! compatible with any principal structures on th site. The community design review board shall review the. desi n .of any accesso struct a ui ment buildin s and site landscaping. I� f .71 Towers shall be a light blue or gray. or other color shown to reduce visibility. No advertisino or identification visible off -site shall be pJaced on the tower or buildin s. J 8 Antennas placed upon the tower shall com I with all state and federal re ulations about nonionizing radiation and other health hazards related to such facilitie I�■I�.■Y ■I�_ ■�I 11I�11 ■�1�11■■I.IpIY- �I�i�l .■ ■� ■I II�_� L99,1 Wireless telephone antennas where located on an existing structure shall. not extend more than. twenty-five 25 feet above the structure to which they are attached. Such antennas are a permitted. use in all zoning districts of the city, _ _I�1■I 1111 ■111.1 I�.I.■_I� ■��■I� �II�1■_■■I I I■ I■■ ■I ■1. X10 Towers with.. antennas shall be designed to withstand a uniform wind loading as .prescribed by the UBC ( Uniform Buildin Code■ ICI lil■■■r�lll�■■q/�����1 I.11IIA■�I ■II -W � ■�I iw� ■��I . I� Telecommunications a ui ment located on the side of an existin structure or on a roof of a structure shall not be screened. Section 36-608. Lights and Other Attachments. . .�.IIU.1...■■�b■�II�■_�I_,.. ■.I _ I. IIY.I■1�■r• -■�� -- No antenna or tower shall have affixed or attached to it in any way any lights, reflectors flashers da )dirrme strobes or steady ni httime li ht or other illuminating devices exce t: 1. Those needed during time of repair or installation, � -- II ■I■I■IrN I■ t�■ �■ ���. �■_I_. ■lii■ ■— �.�_I�■I�Il�.li 2. Those re wired by the Federal. Aviation Aci engy, the Federal Communications Commission or th ci 30 For towers in 2arking lots lights associated with the parking lot. li htin . In addition no tower shall have constructed thereon or attached thereto in way, an latform catwalk crow'snest or like structure except durin enods of construction or repair. Section 36 -609. Removal of Abandoned or Damaged Towers. - - -___— I ■I ■1� .�.�_�I_■■._A ^�.�.Y�I�1� -.I �1_I I ■. A.1.*■I�i.� Any tower and /or antenna that is not used for one (1) year shall be deemed abandoned and may be required to be removed in the same manner and pursuant to the same procedures as for dangerous or unsafe structures established by Minnesota Statutes Sections 463.15 through 463.26. Section 36 -610. Co- location of Personal Wireless Communication Service E ui ment. A proposal for anew personal wireless service tower shall not beapproved unless it can documented by the applicant to the satisfaction of the city council that the telecommunications e u meat p lanned for the proposed tower cannot be accom modated on an existing or app roved tower or commercial. buiidin within one -half mile radius transcending municipal borders of the proposed tower due to Otte or more of the followin 1. The planned a ui ment would exceed the structural caoacity of the existing ,or approved tower or commercial buitdinc„�. 2. The planned. a ui ment would cause interference with other existin or planned a ui ment at the tower or building. 3. Existina or app roved structures and commercial buildings within one -half mile radius cannot or will not reasonably accommodate the ui ment at a . hei ht necessa to function. 4. For residential district si #es the applicant must demonstrate .b providing a city-wide coverage/interference a nd capacity analy that the location of the antennas as proposed is necessa to meet the fre aerie reuse andspacing needs of the cellular s s #em and to p rovide adeq ortable cellular telephone coverage and capacity to areas that cannot be adeguately served by locating the antennas in a less. restrictive district or on existin structure. 5. For all commercial wireless telecommunications service towers a Fetter of intent committin the tower, the owner and his or her successors to al low the shared use of the. tower if an a dditional user a gees in writing to meet reasonable terms and conditions for shared use. Section. 36 -611. Interference with Public Safety Telecommunications. All new or existing telecommunications service and a ui merit shall m eet or .exceed all Federal Communication Commission (FCC) standards and regulations and shall not interfere with public safety telecommunications. Section 36 -612.. Additional Submittal Requirements. Additional Submittal Re uirements. Besides the information re uired elsewhere. in this Code building ermit a0dications for towers shall include the following. supOemental information: 1. A rep and 21ans from a civalified and re istered engineer. or others that: a. Describes the tower hei ht and design including a cross section and elevation. b. Documents the hei ht above grade for all potential mountina positions for co- located antennas and the minimum separation distances b etween antennas. C. Describes the tower's capacity,�including the number and type of antennas that it can hold. d. Includes an en ineer's stamp and registration number, if applicable e. Includes all other information necessa!y for the city to evaluate the request. Section 36 -613. Variances. The gity may rant variances to the re- uirements of this section. All variances must follow the Provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect after the city council approves it and the official newspaper publishes it. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 1996. 10 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, . MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 18, 1996 A.. Tower and Antenna Ordinance Melinda Coleman, director of community development, presented the staff report. Chairperson Fischer the r suggested some changes in the ordinance. Ms. Coleman answered questions from the commissioners. AT &T Wireless Services was represented at the meeting by Peter Beck. Mr. Beck discussed two suggestions contained in his letter sent to Ms. Coleman on November 18, 1996. His first choice was that the antenna setback be from any residential structure. He was agreeable to having. the setback be from the residential lot line but suggested, on multiple - family lots, the requirement be changed to have the setback from the structure. Mr. Beck also asked that in unique situations, a pole could be allowed to be located with the setback from a residential structure. He referred to a previous request, approved by the panning commission, to locate a pole in the Frost Avenue and English Street area. The feasibility of two 75 -foot poles, as opposed to one 150 -foot pole, was discussed. Commissioner Frost thought it was sufficient to require the tower to meet or exceed the standards and requirements of the Uniform Building Code. Commissioner Ericson said she-lives in a townhome and, with her home as an example, would object to allowing a tower to be 25 feet from a residential home. She would agree with having the ordinance state that the 175 -foot setback is required from any residential or multiple lot line and further specifying how this setback could be reduced. Mr. Beck said he did not have town house- developments in mind when he spoke of multiple residential projects. Ken Roberts, associate planner, reviewed Maplewood's setback requirements. The commissioners had no objection to striking the portion of the ordinance that required sufficient information to show that construction and installation of the antenna or tower would not create a safety hazard or damage to the property of other persons. it was adequate to have the construction meet or exceed the standards and requirements of the Uniform Building Code. All the commissioners, except Mr. Pearson, were willing to keep the setback requirements as stated in the ordinance and let the city council make the final decision. Commissioner Pearson had sympathies with a developer in that ordinances are suppose to give direction on how somebody can't develop something. He was hesitant to start developing ordinances that continue to require numerous variances. In order to move forward with this ordinance, he was willing to leave the wording as it is. Commissioner Pearson moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the ordinance which establishes regulations about commercial use antennas and towers in Maplewood as amended. This ordinance is. amended to have Section 35 -805. b. read, "The applicant shall provide at the time of application, sufficient information to show that construction and installation of the antenna or tower will meet or exceed the standards and requirements of the UBC (Uniform Building Code). Commissioner Thompson seconded. Ayes ---all The motion passed. "T44V / MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat PROJECT: Highwood Estates No. 4 DATE: November 26, 1996 .INTRODUCTION Project Description ,cti®n by I Mod.if .W Re j eofed. - 41 Date- Roar Development is proposing to develop lots for 27 single- family homes. They call this development Highwood Estates No. 4. It would be between Lakewood Drive and McKnight Road, south of Highwood Avenue. Refer to the maps on pages 10 -13. Requests To build this project, Roar Development and Raymond and Mary Lee Maida, the property owners, are requesting that the city approve: 1. Development on existing slopes greater than 25 percent. (See the map on page 14 and the letter on pages 18 and 19.) 2. A preliminary plat for 27 house lots and an outlot next to the property at 2292 Highwood Avenue. The proposed outlot is for a garage encroachment from 2292 Highwood Avenue. (See the maps on pages 13 -17.) 3. A variation from the city code to reduce the required street width. The developer is asking to reduce the streets from 32 feet to 28 feet from gutter to gutter. (Refer to the letter on pages 20 -22.) BACKGROUND On September 28, 1987, the city council approved Gonyea's Oak Heights Third Addition preliminary plat. This preliminary plat was for 19 single - dwelling lots along Lakewood Drive and Mamie Avenue, south of Highwood Avenue. On February 13, 1989, the council approved Gonyea's Oak Heights Third Addition final plat. This final plat created 19 lots for houses along Lakewood Drive and Mamie Avenue. The plat also created Southcrest Court street right -of -way, west of Lakewood Drive. With this final plat, the city provided street access to the Roar Development site. This access is from the temporary cul -de- sac on the west end of Mamie Avenue and with the Southcrest Court street right -of -way west of Lakewood Drive. On September 9, 1996, the city council tabled action on this request until their September 23, 1996 meeting. The council also directed staff and the city attorney to prepare findings of fact for denying the plat and to prepare conclusions of law based upon the file and public testimony. On September 23, 1996, the council tabled this request to the October 14, 1996 council meeting at the applicant's request because of a religious holiday. On October 14, 1996, the council tabled this request until December 9, 1996 at the applicant's request. This tabling was to give the applicants time to revise the plat to lessen the grading and tree. loss on the site. The developers also had a meeting with the neighbors to review their concerns with the project. (See the letter and meeting register on pages 30 and 31.) DISCUSSION Open Space and Parks The Maplewood Open Space Committee called this property Site 164. They ranked this site 26th out of the 66 they rated and seventh out. of the 19 they rated in this neighborhood. Maplewood has not included this site in its park or open space acquisition plans. Many neighbors prefer to keep this .property for open space or a park. Maplewood or Ramsey County would have to buy this property to keep it as open space. Ramsey County has no plans to buy the property. There is no shortage of open space in this area. Maplewood recently bought the Grandview open space on Carver Avenue (13.3 acres) and the Kayser open space east of Sterling Street north of Highwood Avenue (16 acres). The council also has approved the purchase of about 10 acres of Beverly Stielow `s property on the northwest comer of Carver Avenue and Sterling Street. This purchase would be for additional open space and would be directly east of the Grandview open space.. Pleasantview Park (14.4 acres) is south and east of the site, just east of the houses on Lakewood Drive. The city also bought another 8 acres of the Kayser property east of Sterling Street for a future neighborhood park. (Please see the Highwood Land Use Plan map on page 12 for the location of these. areas.) Preliminary Plat Construction on a Slope Section 9 -194 of the city code has standards for construction on slopes. Specifically, Subsection (d) requires the city council to approve the alteration of slopes 25 percent or more in grade. The code requires the council to base their decision on the degree of alteration of the slope and the importance of the slope to the character of the area. Much of the proposed plat site has existing slopes of 25 percent or more. (See the plat and existing topography map on page 14.) As 'proposed, the plat will require grading of most of the site, including most of the area with slopes of at least 25 percent. (See the proposed grading plan on page 15.) The developer needs to do the extensive grading to have the proposed streets and utilities meet Maplewood's construction standards. However, the basic character of the site will remain unchanged. That is, the site will generally slope from east to west (Lakewood to McKnight) with the eastern and western edges of the site staying as is to match the grades of the neighbor's properties. Density and Lot Size Several neighbors thought that there were too many lots in this plat and that they were too small. As proposed, the lot sizes range from 11,899 square feet to 64,745 square feet with an average lot size of 25,216 square feet. The lots east of this site on Lakewood Drive and Mamie Avenue range in size from 10,147 to 14,070 square feet. For the properties on the east side of McKnight 2 Road, the house lots range in size from 34,200 square feet to 106,442 square feet (2.4 acres with a ponding easement). The city code requires at least 10,000 square feet above a drainage easement and 75 feet of width. All the proposed lots meet or exceed city standards. Maplewood cannot reduce the number of lots or require larger lot sizes if the proposed plan meets the city's ordinances. Trees Roar Development would grade much of the site and thus remove many trees on the site. Before grading the site, the city should require the .developer to submit a detailed tree plan to staff for approval. Maplewood's tree ordinance requires there be at least ten trees per gross acre on the site .after grading. For this site, the ordinance requires that at least 172 large trees remain. If the developer cannot keep that many large trees, the ordinance requires him to plant replacement trees. This would be up to a maximum of ten trees per gross acre so there are at least 172 trees on site. The ordinance does not apply to trees under eight inches in diameter or box elder, cottonwoods or poplar trees. Since the October 14, 1996 council meeting, the developer met with some of the neighbors and city staff to review the grading and tree plans. The developers have agreed to revise the grading plans to save more trees around - the perimeter of the project sits. (See the letter on page 30.) Wetlands There are no wetlands on this site. However, the site drains to the west to a ponding area behind 1050 and 1060 McKnight Road. The city engineer recommends that the developer add a storm water pond near the rear of Lots 6 and 7, Block 1 to slow and treat the storm water before it enters the existing pond. Drainage - Watershed District The, Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District received the proposed project plans. Pat Conrad, of the watershed district, has reviewed the proposed plans and has given them preliminary approval. Roar Development or the contractor must get a permit from the watershed district before starting grading or construction. Reduced Street Widths Section 29 -52 of the city code requires that Focal streets be 32 feet wide (gutter to gutter). The code says that the city council may permit variations from this requirement in specific areas that do not effect the general purpose of this section. Roar Development wants to build 28- foot -wide streets. (See the letter starting on page 20.) The city engineer is for this code variation if the city limits parking to one side of the street. Since 1993, the council has approved the same street widths with no parking on one side for the Oak Ridge, Maple Woods Estates, Beth Heights and Parkview developments. The narrower streets would provide a larger setback between the street and the homes and would put less impervious surface on the site. 3 Neighbor Concerns (Refer to page 8 for the full summary of replies.) Traffic increase on Lakewood Drive would be hazardous. Ken Haider, the city engineer, said the city designed and built Lakewood Drive as a minor collector street to serve the traffic needs in this part of Maplewood. He also said the current four way stop at Lakewood and Snowshoe is functioning well. Mr. Haider believes this intersection will continue to operate well after the construction of the proposed development. The proposed layout puts all the plat traffic on Lakewood Drive. Lakewood Drive was designed and built as a minor collector street (36 feet wide instead of 32 feet wide ) with a sidewalk on the east side. Some neighbors believe there is too much traffic on Lakewood Drive already. The city .engineer believes that Lakewood Drive can handle the traffic from this development, Several neighbors suggested connecting a street from the plat to the north to Highwood Avenue. Such a street would go through proposed Lot 15 west of the Maidas (2322 Highwood Avenue) but would require additional extensive grading and tree loss. The existing grade south of Highwood Avenue is at least 15 percent while the maximum .street grade that the city allows is 7 percent. Retaining walls also would be necessary to .get to the Maidas' existing garage because the new street would be about ten feet lower than the existing garage. This development would affect the trees and wildlife habitat. The developer has designed this site to preserve the trees west of proposed Dorland Road and east of the existing pond behind 1050 and 1060 McKnight Road.. The required sedimentation basin will help protect the existing pond. Saving the trees east of the existing pond would lessen the loss of wildlife habitat. Neighborhood Preference Many replies said the city should buy this land as open space or reduce the number of lots in the development. The city reviewed this site as part of the open space process but the open ace P P committee ranked the site 26th out of the 66 they considered. There is no shortage of open space and parks in this area as discussed on page 2. As I also noted earlier, the city cannot require the developer to increase the lot sizes or reduce the number of lots in the lat if they meet all city code requirements. P COMMISSION ACTION On August 18, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve three requests for this project. These include development on slopes greater than 25 percent the preliminary plat and a street width code variation. 4 RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approve the alteration of a slope over 25 percent in grade for the construction of Highwood Estates No. 4 preliminary plat. The council should approve this alteration because: 1. The degree of alteration will not affect the basic character of the slope. 2. The alteration will not affect. the importance of the slope to the character of the area. 3. The council approved a similar request in 1987 for the Gonyea Company to build the Oak Heights development in the area. B. Approve the Highwood Estates No. 4 preliminary plat (received by the city on June 19, 1996). The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat: 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. V Place temporary orange safety fencing, silt fence and signs at the grading limits. c. Have NSP install street lights in three Locations, primarily at street intersections. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. d. Pay the city for the cost of traffic- control, street identification and no- parking signs. e. Provide all required and necessary easements. f. Demolish or move the existing shed behind 2322 Highwood Avenue on proposed Lot 11, Block 1. Abandon any wells or septic systems within the plat, subject to the Environmental Health official's approval. 2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall: (1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. (2) Include contour information for the land that the street construction will disturb. (3) Provide a permanent, dual- purpose sedimentation basin as described in the draft 1996 Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District Watershed Management Plan at the end of the storm water pipe between Lots 6 and 7, Block 1 near the existing pond. 5 (4) Show housing styles that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large trees. (5) All proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 shall be identified on the proposed construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. (6) Show all retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls more than 4 feet tall require a building permit from the city. (7) Be revised to show the undisturbed buffer areas as described in the letter dated November 26, 1996. These shall include: (a) On the east side of the development, provide at least a 15 -foot -wide undisturbed buffer on Lots 4 and 5, Block 2. (b) On the south side of the development, provide at least a 30- foot -wide undisturbed buffer on Lot 3, Block 1. (c) On the west side of the development, provide at least a 40- foot -wide undisturbed buffer on Lots 8 and 9, Block 1. c. Change the plat to show the street curves next to Lots 2 -5 and Lots 8 -11, Block 1 with a minimum of a 150 -foot radius on the centerline. Also change the lot lines in the plat to make them radial to the new street centerlines. d. Change the grading and utility plans to follow the revised street and lot design required in Condition 2(c) above. In addition, move the proposed sanitary sewer line between Lots 9 and 10, Block 1 to between Lots 10 and 11, Block 1. This. change is to drop one manhole and to lessen the amount of sewer pipe. This sewer line change may require changing the grading plan to make the grades meet city standards. e. Provide a tree plan for the city engineer's approval before grading or final plat approval. This plan shall show where the developer will remove, save, move or replace large trees. This plan also must show the size, species and location of any . trees that the developer will plant as replacement trees. All deciduous trees the developer plants shall be at least 2 -1/2 inches in diameter. There shall be no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. f. The streets shall be 28 feet wide from face to face of the concrete curb and gutter with no parking on one side. 3. Change the plat as follows: a. Add and change drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. D c. 'Show Nemitz Court as Maida Court on the final plat and construction plans. 4. Provide all easements required by the city engineer. 5. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site .drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developers agreement any grading. that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. C. Adopt the resolution on page 32. This resolution approves a city code variation for 28-foot- wide streets in Highwood Estates No. 4. This variation is subject to no parking on. one side of the streets and the developer paying the city for the cost of the no- parking signs. 7 CITIZENS' COMMENTS [surveyed the owners of the 85 properties within 350 feet of this site. Of the 45 replies, 6 had no comment, 7 were for and 32 objected. (I have summarized the objections due to the large number and duplication of replies.) For 1. I am for the proposal but do not want an outlet on to Highwood Avenue. (Wehrle - 2315 Highwood Avenue) 2. 1 would like to see Highwood Avenue repaired to handle this increase traffic and truck use for this project. The road is getting quite torn up with the heavy truck use. (Aherns 936 Currie Court) 3. Only if the deer problem can be eliminated. The more development that occurs in the area the more landscape damage I get from feeding deer. (Eldridge - 2316 Valley View Court) 4. I would like to see covenants enforced on the homes to be built, so as to protect property values. F would also like to see one street exit on to Highwood, rather than both on to Lakewood. (Anonymous) 5. it looks like a good development. (Dennis Gonyea, Gonyea Development Company) Objections There were several letters and comments in opposition. The main objections or concerns were: 1. The density is too high. Increase the lot sizes and have fewer houses. 2. The city should buy the property for open space or nature preserve, there is a need for more open space in the area. 3. There would be a loss of wildlife habitat and trees, general environmental impacts. 4. Storm water drainage impacts (especially on ponds near McKnight Road). 5. The amount of grading required and erosion and drainage concerns. 6. The traffic increase would be hazardous, especially on Lakewood. Drive. Connect one street to Highwood Avenue. 7. The impacts on the schools. Also see the petition and letters on pages 23 -29. These represent the comments staff. received. Es REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: gross acreage 17.19 acres, net acreage • 15.05 acres Existing land use: a house and accessory buildings at 2322 Highwood Avenue and undeveloped SURROUNDING. LAND USES North: Houses across Highwood Avenue South: Houses in the Oak Heights Additions West.: Houses on McKnight Road East: Houses on Mamie Avenue and Lakewood Drive PLANNING Existing Land Use Plan and Zoning designations: R -1 (single dwellings) p :sec 13- 28/hghest4t. -2 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Highwood Land Use Plan Map 4. Proposed Preliminary Plat 5. Plat and Existing Topography 6. Proposed Grading Plan 7. Erosion Control Plan 8. Proposed Utility Plan 9. 7 -1146 letter from Roar Development (slopes) 10. 8 -9 -96 letter from Roar Development (street widths) 11. Neighbors Petition and Alternative 1 12. 7 -3 -96 letter from Sullivans 13. 6 -28 -96 letter from Willis 14. 6 -25 -96 letter from Jodi Fish 15. 11 -26 -96 letter from Roar Development 16. 11 -18 -96 Meeting Register 17. Street Width Code Variation Resolution 18. Plans date- stamped June 19,1996 (separate attachment) 0 Attachment 1 FS 16 1. NUNTINGTON CT. 2. OAKRIDGE U. 17 1. CURRIE CT. 2. VALLEY VIEW CT. --' 3. LAKEWOOD CT. 74 LAND -4v CT. C ci i �... OWS v BOXWOOD Av. co � Q 88 �.. cc 0 CARVER mmm m� ai• 0 OVERLOOK � CIR. o ce 0 o�C) � t. �5 O Carver Lake LOCATION MAP 4 N 10'• Attachment. 2 4. 4 3-4 ^ 7A V 6 f L L 7 A 71. 'I 4 i $ 4-4-5 !3.443 0 ' Co Zr 7 150-7S �4 .952 C4 90 V C7935"936- C*A ISO 38 Ce) z C .939- 7 9 IN .942 f. A 94 9 946 9-49 01 1'2 1p Z, ( 41 2) w6 Ln U - ) 4 2275 3 4 f-1 1. s C14 C-4 -1: 01 "° 0 1w. - C4 �:) 959; 1-9 (3) (& It N r 9 9 55 60 co 956. - N C64 (44 -�s I I w V ►07. SO 8.07 77, iL LA 0 2 3 6. 150 &05-�-1 ire In 43 2.5 40 i'l Igo Z) 0, �66Ct 2 3 cv Ct) fw (7 (746; 0 #4 r-4 ", M 8. C 2344- of) L 2322 # (-k 2 �A 1 97 goo u: 04 04 LD G C N 27 400000 1 j 75 61. T o as r (t7) 4- 4d C VI 6 Q-Lsll I 1A illy c P. 1�1 Ol 342 1�,-� 1113' C, PLEASANTVIEW PARK 7; LIP 2334; ► /-1,/ 120 11) 1110 \P 1123 .� F 1122.y -2319 14 10 41 OAK 1r- 350 2309 r- ( 2) - 232411< Jac 1 40 1 96 1 i6 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 000 N 11 o 98 0 (2, , tK J-77) r 00 0 < 44 983. -10 0 ..QA!0,' 4 p0av 4 WIT OD R1 N 2 . C 991 \ A 4 7e (57.) ds� I M CV) 91 9k . W 10 �j .3, C*4 ! 04 * 5 ; 1001 assw 0 7 SAO I fit/ --- L L 285 N 15 Cl- ,�° (0 1021 ,; :n,'� 5 , .� 0, T 1020 04, exx- � � � � 8> 102 55 1-79) 0 r - 1 10 22 ;� Co 1050 (s) V 1031 0 � I1032 �'� 1025 OUTLOT jr — 4 4 N U 167 Z02-411-, },-- ( k . 4� A SITE 1043-- o' 1042. 0 apow oil 1049 40 qZ83 85) 140 3 PJD 05 10521P. C. 40 1059 0 ac 1 e� 01 1060 R. I Q 0 Q ,� *4 1063: 0 1062 o = -wo, tvft� �e $ 140 r 10 4. 11 Cp N -Cr 1. 69 V?WptoT 10 c> 107 ep- 2' 14� Z CIO 1070 44"7 IN kzo) .10811 k */ 1082 20 114 .004 30 oil 40 414-76 W. 4r- WON logo Lo 2329 2339 f —11 1101 1092 D Go 2328 0 W OAK IQMTS 6nLiwr 1102 tin ��NYE A'S 1pr% (7,Z) , ��y o as r (t7) 4- 4d C VI 6 Q-Lsll I 1A illy c P. 1�1 Ol 342 1�,-� 1113' C, PLEASANTVIEW PARK 7; LIP 2334; ► /-1,/ 120 11) 1110 \P 1123 .� F 1122.y -2319 14 10 41 OAK 1r- 350 2309 r- ( 2) - 232411< Jac 1 40 1 96 1 i6 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 000 N 11 Attachment 3 1 i major collector Linwood I V \ R-1 ! AA r OS R -1 0 O S E to ._ p \ \eC 100 minor 1 c R 1 M = = os Q r t m noF � maj collector 1 collector ) � Highwood! S. C SITE . � '< ----� ---n R — 1 � -' os .� minor �• collector R- 1 -- 4 p S TT carver , REVISED R•••t- r - --�`: 7 -20 -95 O.s - � � 1 1 V � o os �J 1 l � I a HIGHWOOD I NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 7 4 N 12 Attachment 4 d + _ ��r-_i_ - tom r ./ a I � 0 1 as, its I f3 it i '- ,l- + 1 I �/ \\ % •�`� am r and 04 NA0006 4 --77 1 1 1 , "osum I V boo . / N I I i Lw_w_ - - - -- ••i i r - -- - - -- ,I -, i { '^•Id - -- w� i._-- n! - M � / ♦ i i VIA *� -1 + - -_• .r fo C 0 rM - *C- tv C'o ` ` b \ ` Vq � p yo r 1 1 �• T t i 1_ r_•- •..• 11_1 - + i � r .•l1 nlr• � � � 1 �' ' ' i � �•' i T i J I w3 41w" N`►. CtY. ; ' + Ll i' '� ^`� C••^tr I I, — �— _fib _____j 1 1 ,_ ._ . _ �.. �i�i�ar. `�. 1 �, � :�- ' 1 . ' /'�. fit yAVENtTS �; °";�.•s ; � � � :!''Z " ?� = i� I I ii 1 1 1 1 ir_..,� •�• ( `� A 140 The 1 Y # 11 +I I I .- -- rd amp" — I - - - - - - - I I OM r• t • •r• • •r r • 1 / \ ----- - -- -.- — L--- J-- - - - - -J 1 ► ►• a •• M 1►• 1 ►� V 1 1/ 1 I I I V I l t 11 1 1 1 11♦1 / 0 JO IL I L A � �� ..� s� sus �ts ix� ��►� � s !• "� sa tip+. s ft o il > o s • i Lag!! 5 o ne -1 _ s � � s � - � � .. S v ° i s PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT 13 ■ I M 1 r y ♦ m �d n r� PLAT AND EXISTING TOPOGRAIP Attachment 6 Z log i 394.19 M f 15 • 1 ' • 1 1 15 Attachment 7 1 F I E � • I I I �— . t _=- 1: 1 1 �� ---J - T - 1 � I d I / o p 1 . � 7 �. t : : 4; • I is Pit I OAS % lot EROSION CONTROL PLAN i f 16 "Ole .1000' .40 oe wet--- #-pop Attachment 8 L 4 T- fkb � � % Afte PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN 17 Attachment 9 Roar Development, Inc. 2795 Highway 55 E. Suite R Eagan, Minnesota 55121 July 11, 1996 City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN. 55119 D C� U�'I G J juL i Re: Highwood Estates No. 4 Preliminary Plat ATTN: Honorable Mayor and City Council Our company has submitted a Preliminary plat proposal for 2 tracts of land in south Maplewood for your review and approval. These tracts, consisting of about 17 acres, are located on the south side of Highwood Avenue between McKnight Road and Lakewood Avenue and described as: Tract A: Lot 2 and the west 1/2 of Lots 5 and 6, HIGHWOOD HEIGHTS. Also part of Lot 1 and part of the east 1/2 of Lots 5 and 6 HIGHWOOD HEIGHTS. Tract A is owned by Raymond and Mary Lee Maida. Tract B: Lot 3, except the north 300 feet of the west 110 feet, HIGHWOOD HEIGHTS, according to the recorded plat there of Tract B is owned by Roar Development, Inc. These tracts are shown outlined in red on the attached plan. A resent review by city staff indicates that there will be some grading in areas of the project on existing slopes that exceed 25% grade which requires city council approval. We have been working with the city planning and engineering staff to develop preliminary plans for the highest and best use of the referenced properties. Preliminary meeting with city staff on the plans submitted have generally received favorable review, recognizing that this site is difficult for development. The development consists of 27 lots ranging from 11,900 square feet to 64,745 square feet, with the average lot size of 25216 square feet. Because of the existing slopes and our best efforts to preserve as many trees as possible, all the lots exceed by more than 18% the minimum 10,000 square foot requirement. im r As developers of Highwood Estates No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3; Roar Development had its contractors grade, construct slopes and protect existing slopes along the south side of Southcrest Avenue (a wooded and steep s lope area) to rov We for some of the higher p g value homes in this area. Many of these homes range from $250,000 to $300,000 in value. There are no e rr osio n problems along this steep sl segme of the 1-Ii hwood p � g Estates project. The owners of the subject tracts of land respectfully request your favorable consideration and approval of the preliminary plat for Highwood Estates No.4. Respectfully Submitted, Roar evelopmen Inc. KaA ond R. Maids ary Le .Maids 19 Attachment 10 Roar Development, Inc. 2795 Highway 55 E. Suite R Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Office 405 -8811 August 9, 1996 City of Maplewood 1,830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55119 F it D V' AU3 Re: Highwood Estates No. 4 Preliminary Plat ATTN: Honorable Mayor and City Council Our company has submitted a preliminary plat proposal for two tracts of land in south Ma y lewood for our review and a pp royal. These tracts, consisting of about p 17 acres, are located on the south side of Highwood Avenue between McKnight Road and Lakewood Avenue and described as: Tract A: Lot 2 and the west 1/2 of Lots 5 and 6, HIGHWOOD HEIGHTS. Also part of Lot 1 and part of the east 1/2 of Lots 5 and 6 HIGHWOOD HEIGHTS. Tract A is owned by Raymond and Mary Lee Maida. Tract B: Lot 3, except the north 300 feet of the west 110 feet, HIGHWOOD HEIGHTS, according to the recorded plat .thereof. Tract B is owned by Roar Development, Inc. These tracts are shown outlined in red on the attached plan. We were informed by City staff that reducing the roadway width from 32 feet to 28 feet requires City Council approval. Reducing the roadway width be four feet would benefit and enhance our development and the surrounding developments for the following reasons: 1. The development has 25 large lots with ample off street parking. Many lots have over 100 -foot frontages. 2. Although storm water drainage is not a problem, reducing the hard surfacing would reduce the storm water drainage by 12.5 %. 3. Approving our request to reduce the roadway width would be consistent with similar requests approved in recent plats. 20 City of Maplewood August 8, 1996 Page 2 The owners of the subject tracts of land respectfully request your favorable consideration and approval of the preliminar plat with the reduction in roadwa y width for Highwood Estates No. 4. Respectfully Submitted, Roar Development, Inc. Raymond R. Maida Mary Lee T. Maida 21 C�❑ I Lr 304 Fd OW bw ft- nolw�ooc td1o11fs r too Ift I 1 .- ----------- 6---- _-- _-- �+• - -__ - --� I iot I i t t a' �� Jr �a ii I I % ,� ❑1 r: ♦ ♦♦ ` l i i 11 5L I AIM 1 L ♦ . nr ` ` Mrr00p lmllll ♦`♦ iSr' '♦ /r .• 1 -_ 32t.t{ :: 1 ♦ f �! � i s of rd c ion / /' ♦ %: t 1 1 � � 1 - '• fir/ O 1 i ••. ►. 1 t 1 »• I p si bL j t i t t 1 1 -�� �- - -'�►- -J 1._ -n- d CAN �/ ` 1 1. / to le i ce' i'\� t \ '•• `\ ,% //'/ % '1 •` I I♦ 1. I O OIL COURT i i — FIt C11p!•d IrM ! ! t c L. I le 1 - - -- \ -- -107 - _� I I z �► 'Co Fd t• _ .._ - - �i•wir O El --- . +*1.�Id •' ♦ '; ;v )'AYEIdtfE Sr:.I i ti - st FST� _ j LL U. 1.. 1 � i f � 1 ••� 1 + r II (( ce 1 1 sd cwno I \ t.wl...l •o1•tr M M• sell 1/2 •t 1d i \ %0 1 16 '• I I 1�1 i1.1 T ►• V •• I I L\ N \ I \ �• 1 + ._ —.- - -- ----------------------- -- - --\ r I 1 I I 1 • r♦ r♦ • T t /♦ • t L► 1 11 /1 / • 1 / • •� / ►I♦ 1 tom• • • IL ag 1 9 1 _ o . �_ C t : : wit ° $X- a $ IV o 1 fig 22 Attachment 11 Maplewood Project: Highwood No. .4 Section: 13 -28 The Undersigned residents of the "Oak Heights" residential development strongly oppose the development "Highwood Estates No. 4" as presented by Roar Development of Eagan, Minnesota. Instead we propose that the land ' be developed per "Oak Heig hts Residents' Alternative 1" which is attached. Name Address Date vzw-v_ /'-4� t o 1, 2 Lek e(10 a-ej (ev Maplewood Project: Highwood No. 4 Section: 13-28 The Undersigned residents of the "Oak Heights" residential development strongly oppose the development "Highwood Estates. No. 4" as presented by Roar Development of Eagan, Minnesota. Instead we propose that the land be dev oped per "oak Heights Residents' Alternative V which is attached. N a 9 Address Da e Ala Z7 A I) h An ( CQ3 r 1 _ � • �T.�.• fit""` �• I •/ ,• Ae s 3 i , ; 1tj � • w• • • •• • � � MM11 w V s • e,. 41 T • om C5 ! I r . mo .... . duo M i �Te ft%by _mom so* _�I 7A r IAO .,, .= i am r mom i• ' ro � �......,.�. -,+eye •• l� � st�'��rinat . e 24 ro a� Iwo _PW w � as x • PW co 'u Attachment 12 Peter and Wendy Sullivan 1022 Lakewood Drive South Maplewood,' MN 55119 July 3 1996 Kenneth Roberts Associate Planner 1 830 E..County Road B Maplewood MN 55109 Dear Mr. Roberts: am ventin • • g in • response to you mailing r of June 21, 1996 regarding the proposed l Hi hwood Estates #4. First let me say that while l favor an development called g . t • i w ith their proper as they wish, I strongly urge the city to restrict individuals right to do w p p Y develo prnen# and pure p p purc op en spaces as much as is feasible. I am most certain NOT "n favor of any development of this land. Many visitors to this nei ghborhood • n ss- newer homes, good streets, yet plenty of tre In comment on its unique e • • and residents alike are blessed add with frequent wildlife sig hting . ition visitors a n the quali of velo y bel � eve the de ment of this land would have a negative - impact o p life in this neighborhood, orhood and would likely decrease my property value. . 't i imperative That bung said, and being realistic, I believe 1 is that the city consider the - full of children- to have a safe ,. needs of a neighborhood street system. The alternative . Brain and S inn accomplish that and we would favor :proposals submitted by . . ntion this ro sal would increase traffic on highwood their Alternative #1. As they me p po . - the one of that those who only by one house the of the development. It is only fa • development a a rice along with those of us who also are will profit by this de p pay. . p impacted. Tha y ou ou for considering the needs of this neighborhood. Sincerely, ?10 2-1( Peter and Wendy Sulliv n 25 Attachment 13 Kenneth Rogers Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 .June 28, 1996 Dear Mr. Rogers, JUL This letter is to voice some concerns we have regarding the proposed development of property directly behind our home -- Highland Estates No. 4. We appreciate the information you have made available to us and are very interested in being a part of the planning/development process. We are extremely concerned that the proposed plan will do major damage to the old growth trees in the area, will cause future drainage problems, and will create a tremendous increase of traffic for our street -- Lakewood Drive. Each of these issues will cause a loss of property value for us and our neighbors. First, the mature red oaks in this area have been ve ry susceptible to oak wilt and p other diseases. Many in the neighborhood have already been lost due to damage of the root system caused by construction compacting. The proposed p p grading plan for the development will mean the loss of most of these trees in short order. As currently planned, these "wooded" lots are not likely to be wooded for long. I'm sure you recall the drainage problems directly across Highwood Ave. from our neighborhood in recent years. Their drainage "plan" was not sufficient to 'keep from damaging the houses downhill from new .construction. Since the land behind us is the last natural drainage area in the neighborhood we fear that g neighborhood, there will be no place for all the run -off to go. (Frankly, we're g lad we don't live downhill...) Finally, the current street plan puts all access to the new development on Lakewood -- in fact, sandwiching our home in between access p oints. Our street already is used as a thoroughfare for many other homes and speeds have become excessive -- especially when you realize almost every house on the block has small children. We are very concerned about the increased traffic that this new addition will cause without an access point .to Hi g hwood Ave. We have talked with our neighbors, Todd Eckstrom &Dawn Duerre and Brian & Jean Sinn, and support both their suggestions for changes to the current proposal. Eliminating the cul -de -sac and making deeper lots behind us would we decrease the need for grading, thus reducing the loss of trees and providing- .better drainage. In addition, a street connecting ith Hi hwood Ave would help � g p alleviate our concerns about increased traffic and the safety of our families. Thank you for allowing us the opportunit o comment on the p roposed ty Ian. p p p With everyone's cooperation, we're sure we can make this new development a beautiful addition to our neighborhood. Sincerely, C Steven & Marcia Willis 1 053 S. Lakewood Drive Maplewood, MN 55119 27 Attachment 14 1092 Lakewood Drive. S. Maplewood, MN 55119 June 25,1996 Kenneth Roberts Associate Planner Community Development Dept. City of Maplewood 1830 E. Cty. Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797 Dear Mr. Roberts: I am writing in regard to the neighborhood survey .re: Highwood Estates No. 4. I object to this proposal for a few reasons: First and foremost, the traffic situation on Lakewood Drive S. The proposed development currently will route more traffic on Lakewood Drive South. As a parent to two small children (ages 1 and 4), I have been continually concerned for their safety regarding Lakewood Drive South. As you may or may not be aware, Lakewood is the main thoroughfare into our neighborhood and is wider than most roads in the area. It is also somewhat straight in its design. Because of these facts, it provides continual traffic - continual traffic that most of the time exceeds the posted speed limit. I have called the city engineer regarding this problem in the past. He promised another "Slow, Children at Play" sign to posted on the road. We have yet to see the additional sign. I have summoned the City police previously for obvious violations (in excess of 60+ mph). The police officer that I talked with explained that because of the shape of the city, they often times cannot respond to issues in South Maplewood immediately, and additionally, do not have the resources to continually patrol the area. He explained that I could get the license numbers of the cars and take them to court myself if I wanted to. Let me ask you this, Mr. Roberts, would the City of Maplewood pay for your time off to take citizens to court if they were speeding in your neighborhood? I know my employer would not. The city installed a stop sign at the intersection of Snowshoe Lane and Lakewood Drive S. last year. This has actually caused faster traffic ... by the time that a car stops at the stop sign, they more often than not have sped up and are going even faster by the time they reach my house (which is 6 houses away from the intersection). I guess it is human nature that provides one to think that the stop -sign slowed them down therefore it is necessary to speed up in order to make up for the lost time. So, as a concerned parent, my question is - does a child have to get hurt or killed before the .road gets the attention that it needs or deserves? The thought of routing more traffic on this already dangerous roadway is of grave concern to me. The proposal as drawn will probably increase the traffic on the road by approximately 90 -120 cars /day. I agreed to sign the petition that was drawn up by Brian Sinn, my neighbor at 1062 Lakewood Drive S., in regard to redesigning the plat that was submitted in the neighborhood survey. This redesign would provide entrance into this property from Highwood as well as W Letter from Jodi F. Fish June 25, 1996 Page 2 Lakewood Drive. This is more acceptable than the current design, however, in all actuality, I would not like to see that property developed which brings up my second point .... I object to the development of this acreage because it is one of the last open wooded spaces in South Maplewood. As a citizen that voted FOR the open land referendum a couple of years ago, one of the areas that was designated as a possible open space is THIS property. I understand and realize that there were no guarantees when we voted for the Open Land referendum, however, I would like for the Office of Community Development to assess the open acreage in South Maplewood and identify possible areas that will be preserved. At the time the referendum was proposed and came up for vote, the wooded areas north of Highwood (off Sterling) and north of Linwood (again, off Sterling) were also undeveloped property. These are now being developed as homesites. There is very little acreage in South Maplewood that is being preserved. Third, we were assessed in 1992 for the drain -off created by our current housing development. Will the current drainage culverts and sewers accommodate another housing project in this area? Who will be charged when they do not.? The terrain on the property in question is quite steep and could very likely develop more run -off problems for our neighbors .on the St. Paul side of McKnight Road. There will be a HUGE uproar by the citizens of Maplewood in this area if additional assessments for drainage problems occur (that should not have occurred in the first place!). Finally, witb all the new development in South Maplewood, and our current elementary school already at capacity, how are we going to address the issue of continual over - crowding at our. schools? If this development follows suit with our existing neighborhood, 75% of the houses will have children. At 2.3 children/house, this will be approximately 47 more children introduced to the school district. In addition to the housing developments at Highwood /Sterling and Linwood /Sterling, is the school district prepared to handle this additional influx of students? I enjoy being a citizen in the South Maplewood neighborhood in which I live... one of the biggest drawing factors to building my home in the area was the beautiful woods that have been preserved - this is not commonplace in most suburbs anymore. I think we would be doing our community an injustice by plowing over one of the few remaining wooded sites in South Maplewood. I appreciate the opportunity to voice my opinion regarding the development proposal referred to as Highwood Estates No. 4. I hope that you and the Office of Community Development will not take my concerns lightly. cerely, J 1 ish Citizen of South Maplewood 29 L-11-.)V-25- S46• TUE 1 73 :18 RfDY F-RED A HL 612 698 208• Roar aevelopement, Inc. And A & R En 2795 Hi 55.E. SL :ice R Eagan 30 Minnesota 55121 Phone (6,12) 405-19.8. 11 Fax (61 )) 4 54-0�) 0 1 &r November 26, 1996 Cit of Maplewood 1830 East Count Road B Maplewood, MN. 55119 RE: Hi Estates No. 4 Preliminar Plat A.ttn: Honorable Ma and Cit Council: On Novearnber 18, 3.996 we met with 3.0 residents and ad propert owners to the proposed plat referen.ced abo-,re. A list of their na and addresses is attached. The meetin was held at the home of Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Curu-iin They had. the opportunit to review our propos-ed deve,lopment "Hi Estates No. 4,, ' r J din draina traffic and loss of an.s,v% er q uest io ns and express their concerns re i trees. It was the concensLis that A &-. R En ( pro j ect en could work- -%,vith the Cit F.-n staff and Plan staff to save some additional trees and slopes iilon' the perimeter of the tract b ad the pro g radu*A g plan to proN,ide� the- follo 1) On the east side of the development, a 15 foot undistu buffer could be prowided on. proposed lots 4 and 9,, Block 2 Hi Estates No. 4. "N' On the south side of treed velopment, a minis -Li.ni of a 30 foot buffer c(--)Lild. be provIded. on proposed lot 3, Block 1 Hi Estates No. 4. 3) On the west side of the development, a niinftnum of a 40 foot buffer could b(--- provided on proposed Lots 8 and 9, Block 1 Hi Esates No. 4. Th.e developers re that the prelimar plat for Hi Estates No. 4 be approved contin upon the d evelopers workin with the cit staff to provide for said buffer areas. Sincerel Roar Developnient, Inc. 0 F. . ED 2 Attachment 15 30 NCIV-25-96 TUE 13-:1? R'OY F-RE116=1HL N,I..F-.F,TJNG REGISTER 612 698 208? p Attachment 16 1.. B D. Sh-ui 1.062 Lakewood. Drive So. 2. ',-Aeven & Marcia. Willis, 1053 Lakeivood Drive So. T I Da 'Vri Duerre 143 La..kewood Drive So. -)b(-.-n-t and. Teresa Platzer 4. F 1031 Lakewood. T-Mves So. 5 Luke Schallin 2.328 Oak Hei Court E. 6. B-ru`e &r- Paiiiela Cunnin 2-32-9 Oak Hei CoLirt E. -is 1020 NjcK-j' Road So. I Rot ?rt Hoskii I 8. Willlwii Kortus 1050 McKni So. 31 Attachment 17 STREET WIDTH CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Arthur Werthauser of Roar Development requested a variation from the city code. WHEREAS, this code variation applies to the Highwood Estates No. 4 development that is south of Highwood Avenue, west of Lakewood Drive and east of McKnight Road. WHEREAS, the legal description for this property is: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota; described as follows; Lot 2 and the West one half of Lots 5 and 6, Highwood Heights; Part of Lot 1 and part of the East one half of Lots 5 and 6 of Highwood Heights; Lot 3, except the North 396 feet of the West 110 feet of Highwood Heights. WHEREAS, Section 29- 52(a)(9) of the Maplewood City Code requires that local residential streets sha11 be 32 feet in width, measured between faces of curbs. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 28 -foot -wide streets with no parking on one side. WHEREAS, this requires a variation of four feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows: The Maplewood Planning Commission reviewed this request on August 19, 1996. The planning commission recommended that the council approve the proposed code variation. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 9, 1996. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and to present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the above - described variation subject to no parking on one side of the streets and the developer paying the city for the cost of no- parking signs. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on December , 1996. 32 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA AUGUST 19, 1996 C. Highwood Estates No. 4 Preliminary Plat (Highwood Avenue): Development on Slopes, Preliminary Plat, and Street Width Code Variance Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. He answered questions from the commission. Ken Haider, city engineer, also answered questions about grading and streets in the development. Art Werthauser, representing Roar Development (the developer), was present. He said the sanitary sewer is being placed adjacent to an existing storm sewer easement that has already been cleared of trees. Mr. Werthauser said streets and pads will be compacted, if necessary, to required standards. Commissioner Kittridge expressed concern that sufficient erosion control measures are in place when slope grading begins. Commissioner Kittridge moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Approval of the alteration of a slope over 25 Percent in grade for the construction of Highwood Estates Number Four preliminary plat. The council should approve this alteration because: 1. The degree of alteration will not affect the basic character of the slope. 2. The alteration will not affect the importance of the slope to the character of the area. 3. The council approved a similar request in 1987 for the Gonyea Company to build the Oak Heights development in the area. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes- 6rueggeman, Ericson, Fischer, Frost, Kittridge, Kopesky, Pearson, Thompson Nays- Rossbach The motion passed. B. Approval of the Highwood Estates Number 4 .preliminary plat (received by the city on June 19, 1996). The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat: 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing, silt fence and signs at the grading limits. c. Have NSP install street lights in three locations, primarily at street intersections. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. Planning Commission, -5- Minutes of 08 -19 -96 d. Pay the city for the cost of traffic - control, street identification and no parking signs. e. Provide all required and necessary easements. f. Demolish or move the existing shed behind 2322 Highwood Avenue on proposed Lot 11, Brock 1. Abandon any wells or septic systems within the plat, subject to the Environmental Health Official's approval. 2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b.. The grading plan shall: (1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. 3 (2) Include contour information for the land that the street construction will disturb. (3) Provide a permanent, dual - purpose sedimentation basin as described in the draft 1996 Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District Watershed Management Plan at the end of the storm water pipe between Lots 6 and 7, Block 1 near the existing pond. (4) Show housing styles that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large trees. (5) All proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 shall be identified on the proposed construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. (6) Show all :retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls more than 4 feet tall require a building permit from the city. c. Change the plat to show the street curves next to Lots 2 -5 and Lots 8 -11, Block 1 with a minimum of a 150 -foot radius on the centerline. Also change the lot lines in the plat to make them radial to the new street centerlines. d. Change the grading and utility plans to follow the revised street and lot design required in Condition 2(c) above. In addition, move the proposed sanitary sewer line between Lots 9 and 10, Block 1 to between Lots 10 and 11, Block 1. This change is to drop one manhole and to lessen the amount of sewer pipe. This sewer line change may require changing the grading plan to make the grades meet city standards. Planning Commission -61W Minutes of 08 -19 -96 e. Provide a. tree plan for the city engineer's approval before grading or final plat approval. This plan shall show where the developer will remove, save, move or replace large trees. This plan also must show the size,•species and location of any trees that the developer will plant as replacement trees. All deciduous trees the. developer plants shall be at least 2-11/2 inches in diameter. There shall be no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. . f. The streets shall be 28 feet wide from face to face of the concrete curb and .gutter with no parking on one side. 3. Change the plat as follows: a. Add and change drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property Lines. 4. Provide all easements required by the city engineer. 5. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developers agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval, If the developer decides to final prat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. C. Adoption of the resolution which approves a city code variation for 28- foot -wide streets. This variation is subject to no parking on one side of the streets and the develo r paying the i for pe P Y 9 city the cost of the no parking signs. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. AUU1 1 1 UNAL 1 N rVKMA i 1 VN FOR AGENDA ITEM I -1 City of Maplewood 1 8 3 0 East County Road B N.aDl ewood , Minnesota 55109 Re: Highwood Estates No. 4 Preliminary Plat ATTN: Honorable Mayor and City Council: This letter concerns the develor_ment of "Highwood Estates No. �" • I a m famiti r with the proposed plan for this development and would � �, a like to exrre s s my support for approval 0.1 t e pl n . I have 3 ived in the urea (2434 Soucre.st. Avenue) for over 2 years and rrvP beer. fortunate to exr-erience t open spaces, trees and wil- 11 le th t �:ad reva ijed 'Pre for rary of those years 's Fowever, 1 fi � � p roperty that deve�.oz_.mert }•' �'�' !kn c�o'n from t cla tha I pure .ased m p. P k�� s nA � i ta' n le . I am �_ �"� ±Af1�], t the City of 1 arlewood has mar - ti devAlor "ent in ^n orderly, quclity fashion and that the City d 1 the foes g' ^.t tc i?�clvde a. nelOnborhood park In t�^is s'_f'"ea* Severe 1 ears acc it wp.s d iff icui t to watch tine acres of c d oak trp�°s be �estrc,�P y a n to ..�.4k ��a v for Lakewood Drive and it's houses. � . a U - o -anderA ? ii,cod.s frequently and my kids built t tree hcu there. It was uainful to lose the magni ficent view from t top of tie : that was v, -Dulled down to r:rovide access for the domes that now surround Oak THe igh is Court* But these areas have become a fine dove l cry =nt and are ir kee wing with my expectation when. I rurcha sed my rrcrerty in th is first -ring suburb of Marlewood . It seems ironic to me tl^at the very people who now reside or the land I described above G�^ould be objecting to the cor.tinupt icr_ of a revel cDment t�%,ey Pn jov; a. cor_t'ir-uat� ion that was envisioned by the 0 . Wners and by Maplewood before their eevelopr.!ent was started. V-e south ler; of Msr.,lewood is blessed wit'i many acres of pub) is lend Inc I F em to me to be u(2 1 Plea ss nt View Park in t'n i s immediate area ;,c It- d ce s rot s . �rudent for the City of Maple-wood t9ke additicnnl � land in this area off of the tax roles to satisfy the special irtere s_t of a few residents. Nor does it seep? fair to ask property owners to wl thdraw 9. clan for developmer_t of their property for wv) ich they have been a yin ' taxes at, a rate dictated by the R -1 classification of tine p � g land. T.1ere fore , I ask that you act expiditiously to approve the plat of Highwood Estates No. 4 as proposed. Sincerely, W = C mi r�gQrtha 2434 Southcrest Avenue X. - %- eV. o od , 1�N c;5 19 p L9�L9odr� .fit.. y ALSYRING so am m.mmms a a-ammom a am moan am a an man 8162 NORTHSHORE TRAIL •FOREST LAKE, MN. 55025 • Teieplane 612464-5U2 pity of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B ,Maplewood, MN 55119 11 - 29 - 96 Re: Highwood Estates # 4 At Honoy able Mayor & Members of the C,.+,_ Counci i I am very familiar with the above named prOnCose0 �ve c >T ;,ent arild t. parties who are t ryl n- to ��: ►rtit M tai r:c.a sEeM+r:g y monumental tip hill bath fitter i •ai :;:ere for 27 years and oaying taxes ana assessrr:�.�:i s a � and t- laryIee r+da have decided moo, take the appreciation of their lard inves and use it for their retirement. But a few eery selfish people who have used this land for their own noa wa:.t tc stop the level op::en t and add vatore costs - o it f^r eual intervention. Hr,-- ca^ the neighbors self serving interests stand in t1 v, J of davelopment oft- both: the planrlir:g comr�is on and city engineer have appr oved' the development? Every cri teria has been met and the only thing s ta nding in the way for Council approval are some neighbors who want to continue use this parcel for their own pleasure. I encourage you to approve the plat of this development so Ray and Marylee can enjoy their retirement. It is the right thing to do. It is the fair thing to do. Do not suocumb to self serving special interest groups. I trust democracy still works. Sincerely, Al Syring PE171'ION We, the undersigned residents and property owners of South Maplewood strongly support the residential „ S Y PPo ent�al development of Highwood Estates No. 4 „ as shown on the proposed plat drawing attached as submitted b Development, Inc. and Raymond R. Maida and M kee T. Maida for the following y Roar Develo P Y �'Y owing reasons: 1. This development proposes 27 lots that vary in size from 12,000 S. F. to 57,000 SX with an average lot size in excess of 25,000 S.F. These lots are significantly larger than the lots platted in the adjacent g Oak Heights additions. � 2. This development provides for and guarantees building pads for houses that range from $160,000 to $300,000 +. in value which will enhance the property valuesof the adjacent homes and neighborhood 3. Roar Development, Inc. has an excellent reputation and has developed Highwood Estates No. 1,. No. .2, and No. 3. All of these developments have been outstanding improvements to our South Maplewood neighborhood 4. We strongly oppose the purchase of the land for open space because South Maplewood has adequate open space and parks. 11e city purchase of the land would permanently remove it from the tax rolls. The new homes on this land would significantly increase the tax base of our city by approximately $6.0 Million. 5. As South Maplewood tax payers, we have just had an increase in our property taxes for 1997 and strongly request that the mayor and -city council approve "Hig wood des N0.4” plat and support good development that will increase the tax base of our city. ADDRESS s • � • 4 a � .'�!s it 9 /ftnt/e _ l PEITIZON Wc, the undersigned residents and property owners of South Maplewood strongly support the residential development of "Highwood Estates No. 4" as shown on the proposed plat drawing attached as submitted b ment Inc. and Raymond and M Y Roar Develop y nd R. Ma�d� arykt T. Msudz for the following reasons: I. This development proposcs 27 lots that vary in size from 12,000 S. F. to 57,000 SX, with an average lot size in excess of 25,000 S.F. Thesc lots arc significantly larger than the lots platted in the ad Oak Heights additions. l C� g 2. This development . provides for and guarantees building pads for houses that range from $160,000 to $300,000+ in value which will enhance the property valuesof the adjacent homes and neighborhood. 3. Roar Development, Inc. has an excellent reputation and has developed Highwood E-3tates No. 1, into. 2, and No. 3. All of these developments have been outstanding tmprovements to our South Maplewood neighborhood 4. We strongly oppose the purchase of the land ,for open space because South Maplewood has adequate open space and parks. The city purchase of the lased would perctianently remove it from the tax rolls. The new homes on this land would significantly increase the tax base of our city by approximately 56.0 Million. 5. As South Maplewood tax payers, we have just had an increase in our property taxes for 1997 and strongly request that the mkvor and -city council approve "Hiowood acs N0.4" plat and support good development that will increase the tax base of our city. 1 _ r / �7�1/2S. OIG� .Z �.2 Z �v��.t).o _ 4,. PWq 2Y3 AGENDA NO. MT 40 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager Craig W. Dawson, Assistant City Manager Action by Council ®j Endorse Modified...., Rejected Date Second Reading of Ordinance To Amend Solid waste. Chapter in City Code December 9, 1996 INTRODUCTION On November 25, 1996, the City Council approved the first reading of the proposed. ordinance to update the City Code regulations on solid waste (Chapter 16). A question arose about pricing regulations for very- low- volume waste collection in ,Section 16-33. One Councilmember believed that guidelines for low - volume pricing should be more explicitly stated. DISCUSSION This section of the proposed ordinance would require haulers to have three volume -based prices, with a 30-gallon volume as the starting point for the pricing structure. It would also require that: "Further, each hauler shall provide services for amounts less than thirty (30) gallons at a price below what it charges for collection and disposal services for thirty- gallon volumes." Haulers generally provide this type of service already, although they do not often publicize it. Although they offer it in different ways, most haulers reduce prices for very -low- volume generators and have their customers continue to use garbage cans instead of pre - paying for bags or stickers. This approach appears to be very workable and flexible for haulers and customers alike. Having this requirement in the City Code is a benefit to customers. Haulers would now need to state that this level of service is available, instead of quietly arranging it with customers who request it. Customers seeking very. - low - volume rates would need to shop for services among licensed haulers, the same as a customer with any other level of service. Competition for cost and quality of service should determine what the price for collection from very- low - volume customers will be. The provision in the proposed ordinance gives flexibility to both licensees and residents in meeting the expectations of very- low - volume customers. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the second reading of the proposed ordinance W ithout any changes from its first reading. Chapter 16 GARBAGE, REFUSE AND OTHER SOLID WASTES Art. 1. In General, §§ 16 -1 - -16 13 Art. 11. Collection Licenses, §§ 16- 26- -16-45 Arta Ill. Disposal Sites, §§ 16- 46--16 -55 Art. IV. Recycling and Waste Management, §§ 16- 56- -16 -58 ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 16 -1, Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the following terms, phrases and words shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them: Compost: Shall mean lawn and garden waste, such as leaves and grass clippings, which are allowed to decompose naturally. Garbage: Garbage shall mean food waste and household waste materials. Refuse materials: Refuse shall mean, but not be limited. to, vehicle parts, tires, scrap metal, ashes, grass, weeds and garden waste not being composted, scrap wood, brush, tree trunks, broken or unused"household appliances and furniture, recreational equipment parts, sod, concrete chunks, blacktop chunks, unused building materials, pails, barrels and Simil monfar ;.,left Sec. 16 -2. Disposal requirements -- Generally; frequency. Every person, firm or corporation shall dispose of garbage which accumulates upon his property in the city at least once a week or more often as directed by the city manager. Every householder, occupant and owner of any dwelling, boarding house, apartment building, mobile home,., or any other structure in the city, including churches and halls, shall have garbage and refuse collected by haulers licensed by the city and shall comply with the provisions of this chapter and with the dates of collection and requirements therefor as established by the city manager. Sec. 16 -3, Disposal Methods. (a) Single- and two- family homes shall store all garbage in rodent -proof covered containers between weekly collections. On the designated day of collection in their area, they may place the garbage on the curb in either sealed polyethylene bags of or equivalent to at least one and one -half millimeter thickness, or in 30- to 90- gallon bins. In lieu of this requirement, special arrangements may be made with the hauler for walk -in service. (b) Tree limbs and Christmas trees, cut so as not to exceed four (4) inches in diameter and three (3) feet in length, tied in bundles of no more than eighteen (18) inches in diameter, may also be placed in the same manner as prescribed in Subsection (a) hereof. 2 (c) The owners, operators or managers of any building containing more than two (2) dwelling units, or of any firm or corporation where garbage accumulates in excess of four (4) thirty- to thirty - two- gallon containers per week shall have bin service weekly from a commercial -type hauler licensed to do business in the city. The bins shall be of a minimum capacity of one cubic yard, covered, and of an approved sanitary type with the proper attachments for lifting on to refuse trucks. .(d) Recyclable materials from residential dwellings shall be placed on the curb for collection in bins, boxes or paper bags. (e) Yard wastes (leaves, grass clippings, other soft - bodied plant material) to be collected by a licensed refuse collector shall be placed on the curb for collection in bins or bags as prescribed in Subsection (a) hereof. In lieu of this requirement, special arrangements may be made with the hauler for walk -in service. (f) Refuse and waste materials not disposed of through a licensed refuse collector, shall be take, n to disposal site, (such as a landfill or transfer station) approved by the State of Minnesota or the appropriate agency in the state to which the waste is delivered. (g) Home lawn and garden waste may be composted in small quantities on a residential lot as long as the compost pile does not create a nuisance for neighbors from odor or unsightliness. Compost piles must be placed at least five feet from rear- and side -yard property Fines, and in no case may be placed in a front yard. Sec. 16-4. Containers and storage of waste materials. Except on days of collection when garbage may be put on the curb for collection in residential areas, every person, firm or corporation as a householder, occupant or owner of any dwelling, boardinghouse, apartment building or any other structure utilized for dwelling purposes, and any .restaurant, firm, corporation or establishment that accumulates garbage in the city, shall provide and use one or more fly- and water -tight metal or equivalent rodent - proof garbage containers. State law reference -- Unlawful deposit of garbage, litter, etc., M.S. § 609.686 Sec. 16 -6 Collection and disposal generally, (a) All. garbage and refuse accumulations in the city shall be collected and Conveyed under the supervision of the city manager. The city manager shall have the authority to make rules and regulations concerning days of collection, type and location of waste containers and such other matters as he deems necessary; provided that, such are not contrary to the provisions of this chapter. (b) In all single- and two - family dwellings in the city, it shall be the responsibility of the owner or occupant to contract with the licensed hauler of his or her choice to remove garbage and refuse. (c) Fees for hauling garbage, refuse, etc., under this chapter shall be paid directly to the licensed hauler by the owner, agent, occupant or tenant of the premises at which the garbage and rubbish is collected, and such fee shall be full compensation for the services. The collector may refuse to make collections from any premises when the fees are not paid. 3 Sec. 16 -86. Hours of collection. No collections of garbage or rubbish shall be made, except between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, Monday through Saturday. Sec, 16 -7. Unlawful disposal; location of containers for collection disposal of inflammable or explosive materials. (a) No person in the city shall place any garbage, rubbish or refuse in a street, alley or other public place, or upon any private property, whether owned by such person or not, except as provided by this chapter. (b) No person shall throw or place any garbage or refuse in any stream or other body of water in the city. (c) No person shall place any waste material in any street, alley or other public place in the city. (d) No person in the city shall store sweep or deposit any garbage or refuse in such a manner that it may be carried by elements off his or her property. (e) No person shall bury or burn any garbage or refuse in the city. (f) Except as otherwise provided in this article, all metal containers or equivalent, for the collection of refuse, shall, at all times, be located behind the rear line of the dwelling, in the garage or screened from view from the street, and at least ten (10) feet from any abutting dwelling. (g) Highly inflammable or explosive materials shall not be placed in containers for regular collection but shall be disposed of by notifying the fire marshal who will issue directions for the disposal of said item at the expense of the owner or possessor thereof. Sec. 16 -8. Unauthorized collections. Any person, firm or corporation who permits garbage or refuse to be picked up from his or her premises in the city by an unauthorized or unlicensed collector under the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a violation of this chapter. Sec. 16 -9. Collection requirements -- Generally. It shall be the duty of every contractor, scavenger and person including his agents and employees, who has contracted or undertaken to remove any garbage, refuse, waste material, or other filthy, offensive or noxious substance, or is engaged in the removal, loading or unloading of any such substance in the city, to do the same with dispatch and in a manner as cleanly and as little offensive, and with as little danger and prejudice to life and health, as possible. Sec. 16 -10. Same manner of transporting. All persons, firms, or corporations engaged in the business of recycling or hauling garbage or refuse in the city shall transport the materials in enclosed vehicles, containers or bins, so as to prevent any loss of these materials, and to prevent litter. 0 Sec. 16 -11. Same -- Obstructions, delays, interferences. No person shall obstruct, delay or interfere with any contractor or person engaged in the city in removing any offal, garbage, refuse, dirt, dead animals, sewage or other like substances, or with the proper performance of their contract. Sec* 16-12. Penalty for violation of article. Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine of not more than seven hundred dollars. ($700.00) or by imprisonment for not more than ninety (90) days, or both. Each day that a violation continues shall constitute a separate violation. Violations of this article may also be handled through the administrative offenses section. Secs. 16- 13-- 16 -26, Reserved. ARTICLE II . COLLECTION LICENSES Sec. 16M26. Required It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to collect garbage or refuse in the city without having first secured from the city council a license so to do. Sec. 16 -27. Application; fee; duration. (a) Any person, firm or corporation desiring a license to collect garbage and refuse in the city shall make application for the same to the clerk. The application shall set forth and require: (1) The name and address of the applicant. (2) An attestation that the applicant will follow a long -range plan of disposal in conformity with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regulations. (3) The applicant to use tandem axles or flotation tires to reduce the per axle weights of all trucks used for collection of solid waste. (4) The applicant to provide maps of service routes configured so that customers on load - sensitive streets will be among the first served on .such routes. (5) The applicant to provide collection carts or bins to customers upon their request. (6) The applicant to provide collection of yard wastes to customers upon their request. (7) The applicant to provide special or extraordinary collection services within twenty -four (24) hours of a customer's request. (8) The applicant to provide special service collection arrangements for customers to accommodate their physical health concerns. (9) The applicant to indicate whether it will collect from commercial accounts, residential accounts, or both commercial and residential accounts. 5 (10) The applicant to provide information that may be required of the city by county, metropolitan, state, or federal governments. (b) Said application described in Subsection (a) of this section shall be submitted to the city manager, or his duly authorized representative; upon finding that the applicant is responsible, has .proper equipment for such collection and that no nuisance is liable to be created by the granting of said license, the city manager shall endorse and approve the application. . (c) Before any license may be issued, the applicant shall pay to the clerk a license fee imposed, set, established and fixed by the city council, by resolution, from time to time, which fee shall accompany the application. (d) No license issued under this article shall be for a longer period than one year, and all licenses shall expire on December thirty -first of each year. Sec. 16 -28. Insurance. (a) The applicant shall provide a certificate of public liability insurance in the following amounts for the purpose of collecting garbage and refuse; provided that, such insurance policy shall be subject to the approval of the city manager; and the applicant must also provide a comprehensive general policy or liability insurance with the minimum coverages as stated. At a minimum, conform to Ramsey County requirements below: a. General Liability 500,000 Bodily Injury (per occurrence) 250,000 Property Damage or 500,000 Combined Single Limit b. Auto Liability 500,000 Property Damage 250,000 Bodily Injury (per person) 500,000 Bodily Injury (per occurrence) Sec. 16 -29. Garbage trucks. or 500,000 Combined Single Limit Each garbage and refuse collector licensed under this article shall provide a covered tank or wagon, so constructed that the contents will not leak or spill therefrom, in which all garbage and refuse collected shall be conveyed to an approved disposal facility. The truck or conveyance used shall be kept clean and as free from offensive odors as possible, and shall not be allowed to stand in any street, alley or public place longer than is reasonably necessary to collect garbage and refuse. Sec. 16 -30. Pickup schedules. Each licensee under this article shall consent to and follow a schedule of pickups, setting the day and area of pickups, as established by the city manager, so as to limit area pickups to the same day per week each week. Sec. 16 -31. Duty of licensees to report accumulations of garbage or refuse. Each hauler licensed under this article shall report any accumulations of garbage or refuse in violation of this Code or other ordinances of the city to the city manager or the city manager's on designee. Sec. 16 -32. Suspension and revocation. (a) Failure by a licensee under this article to comply with this chapter shall be grounds for revocation of the license by the city council .after a hearing for said purpose. (b) In the. event the city manager finds violations of this chapter by a licensee under this article, and he or she orders corrections of same, which licensee fails to make, the city manager may suspend the licensee's right to operate under the terms of the license and order this appearance at. the next regular meeting of the city council for the purpose of hearing whether or not said suspension should continue in effect. Sec. 16 -33. Volume -based rates.. Each garbage hauler licensed under this section shall provide to its residential customers a system of volume -based rates. A volume -based rate includes a solid waste collection charge and a disposal charge based on the volume of the solid waste. There shall be a minimum of three (3) categories for the volume of garbage and for the rate of collection, the least amount of volume for which shall be thirty (30) gallons. That part of the price for service based on the disposal charge shall be proportionately different for the three volumes of waste collection service. Further, each hauler. shall provide services for amounts less than thirty (30) gallons at a price below what it charges for collection and disposal services for thirty - gallon volumes. Secs. 16-34--16-45. Reserved ARTICLE III. DISPOSAL SITES Sec, 16-46. Unlawful deposit of garbage, etc. No manure, garbage, offal'or any vegetable or animal matter, or odorous substance, which may be detrimental to health, shall be dumped at any place within the limits of the city. Sec. 16-47. Applicability of article. No dump for garbage, refuse materials and other solid wastes shall be operated within the city by any person, or as a public dump operated by the city. ARTICLE IV. RECYCLING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT Sec. 16-56. Purpose. The city's goal is to improve waste management and to serve the following purposes: (1) Reduction in waste generated. (2) Separation and recovery of materials and energy from waste. 7 (3) Reduction in indiscriminate dependence on disposal of waste. (4) Coordination of solid waste management among political subdivisions. Sec, 16-67,. Program. The city has established and.developed a local recycling program throughout the city. The city's goal is to promote public education and solid waste reduction and recycling. Sec. 16 -58. Rates and charges. The following rates and charges are hereby established for public education on solid waste reduction. and recycling: (1) Residential. The residential rate shall be three dollars and sixty cents ($3.60) per unit per quarter. (2) There shall be added to all statements not paid by the date due a delinquency charge of ten (10) percent of the amount due; provided, however, that the city manager may adjust the delinquency charge based upon a customer's circumstances such that the amount billed could not be paid by the date due. This authority granted to the city manager will Apply to all accounts which have delinquencies that occur after January 1, .1996. mblmem\garbage.2 0 AGENDA NO. -3 action by Council AGENDA REPORT Endorsed... . Modified.,.,,.. Rejected.,., Date TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: ORDINANCE TO SET SEWER RATES FOR 1997 (SECOND READING) DATE: December 2, 1996 On September 3 the City Council approved first reading of the attached ordinance to increase the sanitary sewer charges by 4.1 %effective 1 -1 -97 to provide the revenues anticipated in the 1997 budget. Attached is a copy of the agenda report from that meeting. It is recommended that second reading of the attached ordinance be approved to increase the sanitary sewer charges effective 1 -1 -97. P: AGN /SWRCHRG.2nd Attachments AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director A AGENDA NO. LA�Z - IUAf �Ia4 IVJ7-0 RE: ORDINANCE TO INCREASE SEWER RATES (1ST READING) DATE: August 16, 1996 It is proposed that sewer billing rates be increased by 4.1 % effective January 1, 1997 in order to provide the revenues anticipated in the 1997 Budget, The last sewer rate increases were effective January 1, 1996. A rate increase is needed effective January 1, 1997 to provide the revenues needed to finance the 1997 operating expenses of the Sanitary Sewer Fund. Approximately 75% of the operating expenses (excluding depreciation) are for the sewage treatment costs which the city cannot control. Chapter 473.519 of state law requires that local governments have sewer rates which allocate sewer treatment costs proportionate to usage pursuant to the Federal water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. These federal regulations have been imposed g po because federal aid has been used for improvements and exp ansion of the Metropolitan P po Disposal System. The state law 'in effect requires the City Council to set sewer rates based upon reasonable estimates of sewage flow by type of dwelling. Thus apartments, for g � P , example, must be billed a sewer rate that is less than the rate for single -family dwelli Y In 1991 at the Council's request, the City's engineering staff obtained water -usage data from several apartments and homes in Maplewood. The data was for winter -quarter usage . � e g and indicated that the average usage for an apartment unit was 78 % of the average usage g for a single - family home. This supports the Maplewood sewer rate for apartments which is 80 % of the rate for a single - family home. Agenda Report Ordinance to Increase Sewer Rates (1st Reading) August 16, 1996 Page 2 pR OP SED RATE TNCREASES . In order to g enerate the needed $3,211,540 in sewer billing revenues for 1997, the following rate changes are needed: Present !r no s 'Residential (rate per qua .rl; Single Family and Townhouse $36060 $38.10 Duplex 73.20 76.20 Apartment 29.30 30.50 Mobile Home 36.60 38010 Condominium 36.60 38.10 Nnn- RPCidential Rate per 1,000 gals. 1.83 1.91 Minimum Charge (per quarter) 7.70 8.00 R1EC.QMMF-NDAT1QN It is recommended that the attached ordinance., which provides for a revision of sewer rates, be approved for first reading. PAMANC.M%?\A 3NISEW &WPD Attachment PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO SEWER SERVICE CHARGES THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES EBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 28 -21 is hereby amended to read as follows: The following rates and charges are hereby established for all sanitary sewer services furnished by and in the City: (1) The quarterly residential rates shall be: Single - Family Dwelling $38.10 Townhouse 38.10 Duplex 76.20 Condominium 38._10 Mobile Home 38,10 Apartment 30050 (2) Non-residential rates shall be $1.91 per 1,000 per gallons. Non- residential sewer service charges shall be a minimum of $8.00 quarterly per sewer service connection. (3) The rate for properties used jointly for residential and commercial purposes that are not metered separately shall be billed at non - residential rates. (4) In respect to property which shall be connected with the Cit y sewer system for the discharge and disposal of other residential, commercial or industrial sewage rates, or any waste unusual in either character or amount, then in addition to all applicable charges hereunder, the City Council reserves the right to impose such supplemental sewage rate charges as said City Council shall determine as reasonable and warranted on the basis of all relevant factors. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force beginning January 1, 19970 AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO. FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City Manager City Engineer Pleasantview Park No. 3-Cash Connection Appeal December 4, 1996 Action by Council Endorse Modifie Rej ecte ...... Date Recently a preliminary plat for Pleasantview Park No. 3 was approved by the city council. One of the conditions for that plat was payment of a cash connection charge for the newly created lot on Crestview Drive. This condition was based on the information that the property had not previously been assessed. During the preparation of the conditions for that preliminary plat approval, a search of the records did not indicate the property had ever been assessed for sanitary sewer or water. Recently a second independent search was made of the records. It was found that indeed the property was fully assessed when the original sewer and water was installed. In these cases the city has never attempted to collect a cash connection charge. Staff has notified Mr. Gonyea that the property has been assessed in the past and that we would be recommending that the condition of cash connection charge be dropped from his preliminary plat approval. It is recommended the city council change the plat condition when final plat approval is requested so that there is no cash connection charge required on this property, KG H jC N OW AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT A by C o of j. En dorsed..... TO: City Manager Mod Rej eeted� FROM: Finance Director Dat e RE: WRITE-OFF UNCOLLECTIBLE AMBULANCE BILLS FOR 1994 DATE: December 2, 1996 It is proposed that the uncollectible 1994 ambulance bills in the amount of $121,745.52 be written off. The following four steps are used to collect payments on ambulance bills: 1. First Notice Ambulance charges are billed by the 10th of the month following the run date. The first notice requests payment in full unless covered by Medicare and /or Medical Assistance, in which case appropriate numbers and consent forms are requested. This notice also recommends those individuals not covered by Medicare and /or Medical Assistance file any private insurance claim at this time. 2. Second Na - -e: If the bill remains unpaid 30 days after the first bill, a second notice indicates payment has not been received. It instructs individuals with Medicare that if they have received an explanation of benefits from Medicare, they should file any private insurance claims. 3. Final Notice,: If the bill remains unpaid 60 days after the first bill, a final notice requests payment in full within 30 days or the account will be referred to a collection agency and /or Ramsey County Conciliation Court if the person is a resident of Ramsey County. (State law requires that conciliation court items be filed in the county within which the defendant resides. 4. If the bill remains unpaid, it is sent to Associated Bureaus 90 days after the first bill. Associated Bureaus write two letters. After 45 days, Associated Bureaus calls us and asks for approval to send the unpaid accounts on to full collection and possible court proceedings. The 1994 ambulance bills proposed to be written off have been processed through these four steps. Further collection efforts are not feasible. Agenda Report - Write -Off Uncollectible Ambulance Bills for 1994 December 2, 1996 Page 2 Steps taken to improve collections have been: 1. Revised our billing notices to minimize misunderstandings. 2. Added a mileage charge which increases our medicare reimbursement rate. 3. Continued use of data entry operator to allow the clerk-typist more time to spend on ambulance receivables. 4. Installed new ambulance billing software on January 15, 1994. S. Increased our Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates. 6. Changed collection agencies. The following graph shows the collection rates for 1991 - 1994. Please note that the collection rate for 1994 is only 3.7% lower than 1993 even though there was an increase in advanced life support transports and the addition of a mileage charge. AMBULANCE BILL COLLECTION RATES 10096 8096 W% 40% 20% 0% AS OF 10 -31 -96 1991 1992 1993 1994 Agenda Report - Write-Off Uncollectible Ambulance Bills for 1994 December 2, 1996 Page 3 The following is a summary of transactions for ambulance services provided in 1992 compared to 1993 and 1994. Service Charges $ 400,579 $ 486,773 $ 577,485 Court Filing Fees + 1,386 + 0 + 0 Total Billed $ 401,965 $ 486,773 $ 577A5 Service Charges Paid - 297,123 - 3 80, 243 - 455 Court Fees Paid - 954 - 0 - 0 Hardship Cancellations - 1 4 293 - 220 - 8 15 Uncollectible Balance $ 102 $ 84 $ 121 An itemization of the uncollectible balance for 1994 is attached. The first page lists a recap of the balance by category. The uncollectible balance for 1994 is $36,946 more than 1993. It is higher due to an increase in the number of advanced life support transports and the addition of a mileage charge. Service charges have increased annually due to increases in the billing rates. The billing rates for 1992 through 1994 were as follows: Services Rendered �9� 1993 1994 Basic Life Support - Resident $210 $220 $225 Basic Life Support -Non - Resident 230 240 250 Advanced Life Support - Resident 380 395 430 Advanced Life Support -Non - Resident 420 435 475 Mileage (rate per mile) 0 0 7.10 The increase in billing rates is partly responsible for the increase in uncollectible accounts. It is recommended that the $121,475.52 of ambulance bills itemized in the attached exhibit be written off as uncollectible. rb C: \WPWIN60 \AMB \UNCOL96.AGN CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT - FLAG SUMMARY 12:20 pm 12/15/93 TO 12/31/94 FLAG DESCRIPTION CALLS CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE P SUBMITTED TO COIL. AGENCY 184 63051.10 8662.67 54388.43 r VETERANS ADMINISTRATION ** 2 938.10 349.13 588.97 S WORKMANS COMPENSATION ** 18 5906.30 5003.80 902.50 U BANKRUPTCY 6 1841.70 202.72 1638.98 V DECEASED 51 19912.40 6117.85 13794.55 W. RESIDENT OF SOUTH AFRICA 1 278.40 160.56 117.84 x MA DENIED - HAS HMO* 33 11334.30 0.00 11334.30 y WRITE -OFF ACCTS M /MA ** -- 221 - - - - -- 85352.50 ---- - - - - -- 46372.55 ---- - - - - -- 38979.95 ---- - - - - -- TOTALS 516 188614.80 66869.28 121745.52 For individuals who are covered by Medicare and Medical Assistance, the City can only charge what is allowed -- balances have to be written, off, * Individuals who have MA or MA rejected claims, or balances on bills paid by either the Veterans Administration or Workers Compensation cannot be legally pursued by the City of Maplewood. ( 1 ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT 12:20 pm 12/15/93 TO 12/31/94 CALL PAT. NUMBER PATIENT NAME DATE F C CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE ------ - r - - - m--mm - ------ m - - - - - - - m --- - - - - - ft-- m " - - m - m - - - - -- mm - - - - m - - - - - 312001 9319087R MOEN, CHARLES 12/30/93 y 1 267.60 160.88 106.72 401001 9400013 FOSTER, PATRICIA 1/ 1/94 x 1 260850 0.00 260.50 401005 9400053R YARUSSO, JOSEPHINE 1/ 2/94 y 1 451.30 258.96 .192.34 401010 9400142 SCRAMLIN, HELEN 1/ 4/94 y 1 260.50 161.82 98.68 401030 9400158 CONLIN, ROBERT 1/ 4/94 p 1 482.10 211.24 270.86 401016 9400183 SANTOS, BARBARA 1/ 5/94 y 1 288.90 110.68 178.22 401017 9400191 GUZMAN, DELORES 1/ 5/94 y 1 479.70 268.53 211.17 401019 9400209 GILLESPIE, CLIFFOR 1/ 5/94 p 1 486.80 0.00 486.80 401020 9400212 MORROW, STEVEN 1/ 5/94 s 1 313.90 266.82 47.08 401022 9400227 THIGPEN, FRANCIS 1/ 5/94 p 1 281.80 0.00 281.80 401023 9400235R LANDERVILLE, ELLA 1/ 6/94 v 1 472.60 0.00 472.60 401024 9400238 PUTNAM, JOYCE 1/ 6/94 p 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 401025 9400252R BLISS, PETE P 1/ 6/94 v 1 246.30 110.94 135.36 401031 9400301 MERRIMAN, ROSETTA 1/ 7/94 p 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 401033 9400303 LUNSMAN, BARBARA 1/ 7/94 p 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 401034 9400307 DERANEK, ANDY 1/ 7/94 s 1 257.10 218.54 38.56 401035 9400315 CHATTERTON, MARIE 1/ 7/94 v 1 444.20 0.00 444.20 401039 9400338 HARTZER, TAMMY 1/ 8/94 y 1 524.70 268.53 256.17 401040 9400357R DYRDA, BETTY 1/ 8/94 v 1 458.40 314.47 143.93 401042 9400368 BALLBACH, JOY 1/ 8/94 y 1 288.90 110.68 178.22 401045 9400431 SHANKS, KATHLEEN 1/ 9/94 p 1 281.80 0.00 281.80 401046 9400432 REDDEN, JUDY 1/ 9/94 p 1 479.70 0.00 479.70 401047 9400436 WHITEBREAD., BENTON 1/ 9/94 v 1 479.70 0.00 479.70 401048 9400437 SCHULTZ, DAWN 1/ 9/94 y 1 458.40 327.57 130.83 401049 9400451 HALLIGAN, RICHARD 1/ 9/94 y 1 281.80 124.87 156.93 401052 9400469 BALLERRESOS, PAUL 1/10/94 p 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 401063 9400569 GILLESPIE, CLIFFOR 1/11/94 p 1 486.80 0.00 486.80 401079 9400803 JAMES, LASHELL 1/16/94 p 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 401081 9400825 MORITZ, GEORGE 1/16/94 v 1 274.70 0.00 274.70 401085 9400863 DYBVIG, BEVERLY 1/17/94 y 1 253.40 96.83 156.57 401087 9400866 KRONHOLM, EDWARD 1/17/94 p 1 444.20 355.36 88.84 401088 9400867 DEUEL, MICHAEL 1/17/94 p 1 264.20 0.00 264.20 401091 9400903 CONVERSE, PAUL 1/18/94 p 1 274.70 0.00 274.70 401092 9400945 IVERSON, CHRISTOPH 1/19/94 p 1 321.00 0.00 321.00 401095 9400988R YARUSSO, JOSEPHINE 1/19/94 y 1 451.30 258.96 192.34 401.097 9400954 JOHNSON, MARY 1/19/94 y 1 479.70 22.16 457.54 401102 9400996 OLSON, LINDA 1/20/94 p 1 531.80 0.00 531.80 401105 9401012 McGUIRE,, MICHAEL 1/20/94 p 1 517.60 465.84 51.76 401108 9401037 ALLBRIGHT, JUSTINE 1/20/94 y 1 479.70 268.53 211.17 401109 9401063 McGUIRE, MARSHA 1/21/94 p 1 479.70 0.00 479.70 401110 9401080 MOONEN, CHERYL 1/21/94 p 1 285.50 0.00 285.50 401117 9401245 SLABASZEWSKI, SAND 1/24/94 y 1 288.90 110.68 178.22 401122 9401305 CASPARY, TONYA 1/26/94 y 1 489.20 254.68 234.52 401124 9401323 BACKES, MICHAEL 1/26/94 p 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 401127 9401336 VOELLER, ARTHUR 1/26/94 y 1 458.40 327.57 130.83 401135 9401369 EIBERTSON, DORIS 1/27/94 p 1 246.30 0.00 246.30 401131 9401409 GILLESPIE, CLIFFOR 1/28/94 p 1 486.80 0.00 486.80 ( 1 ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT 12:20 pm 12115/93 TO 12/31/94 CALL PAT. NUMBER PATIENT NAME DATE F C CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ------- ----- - - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 401133 9401477 CONSTANT, ROSEMARY 1/29/94 p 1 232.10 0.00 232.10 401139 9401482 HOFSTAD, MARLENE 1/29/94 x 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 401141 9401550 HANSEN, DAGNY 1/30/94 x 1 458.40 0.00 458.40 402001 9401610 MITCHELL, ROBERT 2/ 1/94 p 1 281.80 0.00 281.80 402007 9401658 GROSSEL, MICHAEL 2/ 2/94 y 1 260.50 148.87 111.63 402011 9401713R SCHAUFELBERGER, AN 2/ 3/94 y 1 465.50 331.44 134.06 402037 9401756 KEENAN, JOSEPH 2/ 4/94 x 1 472.60 0.00 472.60 402020 9401859 BRUNKO, AARON 2/ 6/94 p 1 479.70 0.00 479.70 402025 9401908 LUNSMAN, GARRETT 2/ 7/94 p 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 402027 9401957 POURZANDRAKIL, MAR 2/ 8/94 x 1 288.90 0.00 288.90 402029 9401925 MARISTUEN, KERMIT 2/ 8/94 p 1 482.10 0.00 482.10 402034 9402019 MURPHY, DANIEL 2/ 9/94 y 1 232.10 134.63 97.47 402049 9402156 SCHICHEL, GREGORY 2/11/94 y 1 .281.80 159.55 122.25 402051 9402164 GILLESPIE, JEAN 2/12/94 p 1 281.80 0.00` 281.80 402053 9402176 THEIS, NOREEN 2/12/94 p 1 146.30 0.00 146.30 402054 9402176A THEIS, JOHN 2/12/94 p 1 146.30 0.00 146.30 402055 9402200 REYNOLDS, MICHELLE 2/12/94 p 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 402060 9402176B WOLF, MARY 2/12/94 y 1 271.30 94.06 177.24 402056 9402255 CHESNUT, ANNABELLE 2113/94 p 1 437.10 252.77 184.33 402058 9402287 CARPENTER, BARBARA 2/14/94 p 1 517.60 0.00 517.60 402061 9402309 STAHNKE, MARGARET 2/14/94 y 1 239.20 120.17 119.03 402065 9402338 GONSER, LOIS 2/15/94 v 1 335.20 0.00 335.20 402064 9402334 SERPICO, THERESA 2/16/94 x 1 437.10 0.00 437.10 402073 9402408 MILLER, RACHEL 2/16/94 p 1 274.70 0.00 274.70 402074 9402424 VOELLER, ARTHUR 2/16/94 y 1 444.20 319.83 124.37 402077 9402477 JOHNSTON, RACHEL 2/17/94 y 1 274.70 105.14 169.56 402078 9402501 GILLESPIE, CLIFFOR 2/18/94 p 1 501.00 0.00 501.00 402079 9402503 ALLEN, LETA 2/18/94 u 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 402081 9402574R BLISS, PETE P 2/18/94 v 1 451.30 258.96 192.34 402082 9402613 DAHLGREN, SALLY 2/19/94 y 1 538.90 274.07 264.83 402083 9402630 NELSON, EHARD 2/19/94 p 1 489.20 0.00 489.20 402087 9402669R STRONG, GRANT 2/20/94 y 1 281.80 173.43 108.37 402093 9402797 BOYER, MARIA 2/23/94 s 1 306.80 260.78 46.02 402094 9402842 NELLES, ALMA 2/24/94 x 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 402095 940285OR BOSSMAN, IDA 2/24/94 y 1 501.00 280.63 220.37 402101 9402915 SIMMONS, RACHELLE 2/25/94 y 1 267.60 102.37 165.23 402102 9402943 BERG, MALCOLM 2/26/94 y 1 493.90 274.07 219.83 402103 9402965 CONNETT, JOANN 2/26/94 p 1 296.00 0.00 296.00 402107 9402997 LARSON, LILLIAN 2/27/94 y 1 444.20 255.86 188.34 402109 9403006 BONESS, FRANK 2/27/94 y 1 274.70 105.14 169.56 403003 9403110 JOHNSON, HOLLY 3/ 1/94 p 1 299.70 0.00 299.70 403004 9403120 ZENTZ, ORVILLE 3/ 1/94 y 1 531.80 274.44 257.36 403005 9403133 BAKER, MICHAEL 3/ 1/94 p 1 458.40 0.00 458.40 403007 9403148 WASHINGTON, DENNIS 3/ 1/94 p 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 403012 9403178 ETHIER, VIOLET 3/ 2/94 y 1 486.80 343.05 143.75 403013 9403185 DUCKWORTH, FOREST 3/ 2/94 s 1 482.10 409.79 72.31 403015 9403204R OUI, TANH 3/ 2/94 y 1 451.30 257.45 193.85 ( 2) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT 12:20 pm 12/15/93 TO 12/31/94 CALL PAT. NUMBER PATIENT NAME DATE F C CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE 403017 9403212R OUI, TANH 3/ 3/94 y 1 451.30 257.45 193.85 403018 9403214 MAKI, MARY 3/ 3/94 x 1 232.10 0.00 232.10 403019 9403244 RUSTAND, DONALD 3/ 4/94 p 1 257.10 0.00 257.10 403020 9403313 ENGEN, SHERYL 3/ 5/94 y 1 246.30 94.06 152.24 403021 9403315R OUI, TANH 3/ 5/94 y 1 246.30 94.06 152.24 403024 94003579 TIETZ, MARGARET 3/10/94 y 1 281.80 138.75 143.05 403027 9403666 BAKER, WENDY 3/11/94 x 1 257.10 0.00 257.10 403028 9403681 HALL, BYRON 3/11/94 u 1 253.40 202.72 50.68 403034 9403662 URZUA, ANN 3/11/94 v 1 288.90 141.84 147.06 403031 9403728 SEVERSON, TERRI 3/12/94 p 1 288.90 10.00 278.90 403036 9403715A MORENO, JOSE 3/12/94 p 1 278.40 0.00 278.40 403041 9403753 CARLSON, CLARENCE 3/13/94 p 1 451.30 361.04 90.26 403045 9403811 LYNAUGH, MARYANNE 3/14/94 y 1 524.70 339.18 185.52 403047 9403820 TIETZ, MARGARET 3/14/94 y 1 281.80 138.75 143.05 403049 9403653R DUREN, RICHARD 3/14/94 y 1 281.80 138.75 143.05 403051 9403882 BREYER, DOUGLAS 3/15/94 p 1 278.40 0.00 278.40 403052 9403898 DORIS, BRUCE 3/16/94 p 1 465.50 196.00 269.50 403053 9403900 BAKER, MICHAEL 3/16/94 p 1 451.30 0.00 451.30 403055 9403914R FLAHERTY, DOROTHY 3/16/94 y 1 472.60 335.31 137.29 403057 9403929 LANE, WILMA 3/16/94 x 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 403063 9403965 BURFIEND, WILLIAM 3/17/94 p 1 257.10 181.85 75.25 403065 9403994 KRUSZEWSKI, ANNA 3/17/94 y 1 246.30 154.08 92.22 403067 9404073 HIGGINS, RYAN 3/19/94 x 1 493.90 0.00 493.90 403071 9404157R MOEN, DOROTHY 3/20/94 y 1 472.60 335.31 137.29 403077 9404266 POLSKI, MICHAEL 3/22/94 y 1 321.00 113.45 207.55 403078 9404275 MITCHELL, BETTY 3/22/94 p 1 493.90 0.00 493.90 403080 9404309 LATHAM, SEAN 3122/94 p 1 288.90 0.00 288.90 403081 9404311 DENZER, ESSIE 3/22/94 y 1 458.40 327.57 130.83 403083 9404281 BETRA, LYNDA 3/22/94 y 1 257.10 88.52 168.58 403094 9404420 WARREN, LISA 3/24194 p 1 306.80 0.00 306.80 403099 9404467 HARRY, RAYMOND 3/25/94 v 1 465.50 418.95 46.55 403103 9404593 RONDEAU, RICHARD 3/28/94 y 1 246.30 154.08 92.22 403109 9404672 POLSKI, MICHAEL 3/29/94 y 1 313.90 110.68 203.22 403115 9404772 BLESENER, AMBER 3/31/94 x 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 404001 9404842 CAMARILLO, MARINA 4/ 1/94 p 1 232.10 0.00 232.10 404002 9404845 SPATOLA, GIOBANNA 4/ 1/94 p 1 257.10 0.00 257.10 404005 9404853 EVERSON, RUTH 4/ 1/94 y 1 260.50 161.82 98.68 404006 9404875 BROWN, FRIEDA 4/ 1/94 y 1 451.30 258.96 192.34 404008 9404896 LARSON, LILLIAN 4/ 2/94 y 1 451.30 258.96 192.34 404010 9404948 FUCHS, BERNARD 4/ 2/94 y 1 451.30 217.16 234.14 404013 9405006 THANE, CHARLES 4/ 4/94 y 1 253.40 88.52 164.88 404014 9405019 FRANCO, SYLVIA 4/ 4/94 y 1 538.90 274.07 264.83 404016 9405075 OLSON, MARY 4/ 5194 p 1 538.90 0.00 538.90 404025 9405148R YARUSSO, JOSEPHINE 4/ 6/94 y 1 458.40 262.05 196.35 404026 9405167 NELSON, EHARD 4/ 7/94 p 1 489.20 0.00 489.20 404028 9405191 DEFOE, SCOTT 4/ 7/94 y 1 253.40 157.95 95.45 404029 9405173 WALSH, SEAN 4/ 7/94 p 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 ( 3 ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT 12:20 pm 12/15/93 TO 12/31/94 CALL PAT. NUMBER PATIENT NAME DATE F C CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE ------ 404034 ----------- 9405312 - - - - - - - - - - - m --- m - - DEFOE, SCOTT r --- r --- - - 4/ 9/94 y - 1 -------- 246.30 - - - - - - - - 154.08 -------- 92.22 404035 9405317 GILLESPIE, CLIFFOR 4/ 9/94 p 1 288.90 0.00 288.90 404038 9405427 BAUER, EMMA 4/11/94 y 1 451.30 258.96 192.34 404042 9405455 JORISSEN, CHARLES 4/12/94 y 1 472.60 268.25 204.35 404048 9405569 STANDIFORD, DANIEL 4/14/94 p 1 306.80 0.00 306.80 404052 9405667 ALLEN, LETA 4/15/94 u 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 404057 9405646 NGUYEN, BA THI 4/15/94 y 1 493.90 346.92 146.98 404058 9405651 RAUSCHER, PATRICK 4/15/94 y 1 267..60 165.69 101.91 404053 9405860 SUNDGAARD, LEIF 4/18/94 p 1 246.30 236.30 10.00 404064 9405879 LEURER, ARLENE 4/19/94 y 1 288.90 141.84 147.06 404068 9406000 LAMOTTE, ELIZABETH 4/21/94 p 1 281.80 138.75 143.05 404070 9406016 SINGH, PRITAM 4/21/94 p 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 404077 9406202 WILLS, MARJORIE 4/24/94 y 1 444.20 255.86 188.34 404090 9406268 BIORN, LAURA 4/25/94 p 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 404092 9406299R HOEFS, LOUIS 4/26/94 y 1 465.50 331.44 134.06 404096 9406391 HARRY, RAYMOND 4/28/94 v 1 253.40 228.06 25.34 404099 9406398 GERBITZ, EILEEN 4/28/94 y 1 458.40 327.57 130.83 404102 9406451 REEVES, KRISTIENA 4/29/94 p 1 278.40 0.00 278.40 404103 9406482 BAKER, RICKY 4/30/94 y 1 458.40 46.18 412.22 405002 9406594R VOIGHT, GEORGE 5/ 1/94 y 1 472.60 335.31 137.29 405008 9406654 SEVERSON, KERRY 5/ 2/94 y 1 246.30 154.08 92.22 405024 9406666 CONARD, JaMONEY 5/ 2/94 p 1 246.30 0.00 246.30 405016 9406760 MURPHY, MICHAEL 5/ 4/94 y 1 253.40 126.36 127.04 405018 9406785R YARUSSO, JOSEPHINE 5/ 5/94 y 1 451.30 258.96 192.34 405063 9406812 CALHOUN, DONNA 5/ 5/94 v 1 444.20 0.00 444.20 405031 9406875 REYES, NICHOLE 5/ 6/94 y 1 281.80 107.91 173.89 405064 9406858 WALSH, EUGENE 5/ 6/94 v 1 444.20 255.86 188.34 405033 9406944 DEBE, DUANE 5/ 7/94 u 1 257.10 0.00 257.10 405034 9406969R REITER, LORNA 5/ 8/94 y 1 486.80 274.44 212.36 405035 9406981 HER, SIA 5/ 8/94 x 1 510.50 0.00 510.50 405037 9406992 SCHULTZ, DAWN 5/ 8/94 y 1 465.50 331.44 134.06 405038 9406994 JOHNSON, STEFNY 5/ 8/94 y 1 472.60 265.76 206.84 405019 9407005 ELMER, ESTHER 5/ 9/94 y 1 246.30 123.27 123.03 405021 9407039 BRACKEY, KATHY 5/ 9/94 s 1 306.80 260.78 46.02 405040 9407031 RICE, DENNIS 5/ 9/94 p 1 264.20 0.00 264.20 405022 9407076 HILPERT, JOEL 5/10/94 s 1 321.00 272.85 48.15 405042 9407067 GILLESPIE, CLIFFOR 5/10194 p 1 281.80 0.00 281.80 405054 9407304 DUNKLE, LEAH 5/13/94 y 1 437.10 315.96 121.14 405055 9407321 PANCAKE, GRETCHEN 5/13/94 x 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 405067 9407320 WALSH, EUGENE 5/13/94 v 1 444.20 255.86 188.34 405058 9407440 JACKSON, KELLY 5/15/94 p 1 278.40 0.00 278.40 405070 9407448 GILLESPIE, CLIFFOR 5/16/94 p 1 501.00 0.00 501.00 405060 9407510 VANN, WILLIAM 5/17/94 p 1 458.40 458.00 0.40 405071 9407509 COBURN, CAMILLE 5/17/94 p 1 288.90 10.00 278.90 405072 9407526 BUERSKEN, LEE 5/17/94 p 1 313.90 0.00 313.90 405075 9407568 BIEDSCHEID, GERTRU 5/18/94 v 1 444.20 214.16 230.04 405080 9407610 WALSH, EUGENE 5/18/94 v 1 444.20 255.86 188.34 ( 4) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT 12:20 pm 12/15/93 TO 12/31/94 CALL PAT. NUMBER PATIENT NAME DATE F C CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE 405081 9407616 WELLS, DWIGHT 5/18/94 p 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 405084 9407632 BENAVIDES, WALTHER 5 /19/94 w 1 278.40 160.56 117.84 405086 9407642 POLSKI, MICHAEL 5/19/94 y 1 328.10 116.22 211.88 405087 9407661 LAMMERS, MICHAEL 5/19/94 p 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 405088 9407667 ROBINETTE, THOMAS 5/19/94 p 1 246.30 0.00 246.30 405089 9407680 4UESNEL, MELANIE 5/19/94 p 1 451.30 0.00 451.30 405090 9407734 GLASS, FLORENCE 5/20/94 y 1 510.50 331.44 179.06 405098 9407733 VOLKMANN, MAYME 5/20/94 v 1 274.70 0.00 274.70 405092 9407793 WALSH, EUGENE 5/21/94 v 1 444.20 256.01 188.19 405100 9407805 BAILEY, EVELYN 5/21/94 y 1 239.20 120.17 119.03 405095 9407868 BETRU, LYNDA 5/22/94 y 1 482.10 251.91 230.19 405101 9407923 BETRU, LYNDA 5/23/94 y 1 482.10 251.91 230.19 405102 9407927 ZICK, ANGELENE 5/23/94 s 1 292.60 248.71 43.89 405106 940796IR HOEFS, LOUIS 5/24/94 y 1 267.60 165.69 101.91 405109 9408029 BAKER, RICKEY 5/24/94 r 1 472.60 0.00 472.60 405112 9408079 OLCOTT, AIMEE 5/26/94 y 1 239.20 203.32 35.88 405115 9408116 SWANDOLLAR, JOSEPH 5/26/94 y 1 296.00 103.19 192.81 405118 9408157 CAMPION, HELENE 5/27/94 v 1 444.20 62.84 381.36 405122 9408197 MEDIA, ADRIEN 5/28/94 p 1 306.80 0.00 306.80 405124 9408210 ROELL, ROGER 5/28/94 p 1 508.10 375.00 133.10 405131 9408303 THOMPSON, DENISE 5/29/94 p 1 278.40 0.00 278.40 405132 9408323R KUEHLWEIN, WALTER 5/30/94 y 1 472.60 335.31 137.29 405133 9408324 LAURER, ARLENE 5/30/94 y 1 239.20 150.21 88.99 405141 9408417 SAATZER, RONALD 5/31/94 p 1 271.30 0.00 271.30 406004 9408501R WILLIAMS, INEZ 6/ 2/94 y 1 479.70 339.18 140.52 406007 9408526 ESTBY, FREDERICK 6/ 2/94 p 1 486.80 0.00 486.80 406015 9408775 ETHIER, VIOLET 6/ 7/94 y 1 260.50 161.82 98.68 406016 9408779 FINBERG, PHILLIP 6/ 7/94 p 1 458.40 0.00 458.40 406017 9408790 RAMSEY, PAULINE 6/ 7/94 v 1 458.40 0.00 458.40 406020 9408887 WEYER, MAE 6/ 9/94 v 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 406025 9408922 ANDERSON, DOROTHY 6/ 9/94 v 1 444.20 255.86 188.34 406026 9408941 TRIEMERT, KIRK 6/ 9/94 p 1 285.50 0.00 285.50 406029 9409006 SIMMONS, ROBERT 6/10/94 p 1 132.10 0.00 132.10 406031 9409016 GILLISPIE, CLIFFOR 6/10/94 p 1 493.90 0.00 493.90 406035 9409077 COLEMAN, ROCHELLE 6/11/94 y 1 486.80 271.30 215.50 406036 9409089 GOETSCHEL, MARVEL 6/11/94 y 1 501.00 350.79 150.21 406038 9409110 SALAS, CARMELO 6/12/94 y 1 267.60 16.62 250.98 406039 9409112 JOLLY, DAVID 6/12/94 p 1 281.80 0.00 281.80 406041 9409121 FISHER, HELEN 6/12/94 y 1 239.20 63.03 176.17 406042 9409157 CHARNELL, ELIZABET 6/12/94 p 1 288.90 0.00 288.90 406043 9409165 GROWE, DANIEL 6/12/94 p 1 273.00 0.00 273.00 406044 9409165A RICHARDSON, MARC 6/12/94 p 1 250.50 0.00 250.50 406045 9409167R FLIPP, MAY 6/13/94 v 1 246.30 0.00 246.30 406050 9409209 JOHNSON, NATHAN 6/13/94 p 1 246.30 0.00 246.30 406049 9409240 RIASCOS, ZEMIRE 6/14/94 p 1 496.30 0.00 496.30 406055 9409326 HIGGINS, WILLIE 6/15/94 p 1 510.50 0.00 510.50 406057 9409328 HARRY, RAYMOND 6/15/94 v 1 444.20 399.78 44.42 ( 5 ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT 12:20 pm 12/15/93 TO 12/31/94 CALL PAT. NUMBER PATIENT NAME DATE F C CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE 406062 9409441 WALSH, EUGENE 406070 9409574 WALSH, ETHELYN 406071 9409584 PABLO, RONALD 406072 9409606 GANZKOW, DEAN 406078 9409723 FRERICHS, CHAD 406079 9409729 MONSON, MICHAEL 406084 9409826R THOMPSON, CORAL 406087 9409849 WASHINGTON, DENNIS 406088 9409853 HEARDEN, MARILYN 406090 9409943 MERINGDOL, JOHN 406095 9409939 SPETEN, DIANNE 406092 9409971 OLSON, WAYNE 406094 9410027 PASILLAS, CECILIA 406099 9409989R HALLGREN, STEPHEN 406100 9410029 SCHOMMER, MARTIN 406106 9410075 HERZOG, MICHAEL 406109 9410130 JEWITT, COLLEEN 407002 9410415 HARRY, RAYMOND 407004 9410442 DAVIDS, CHRISTINE 407005 9410444 WALSH, MILDRED 407006 9410486 IVES, ASHLEY 407008 941054OR QUI, TANH 407010 941058OR NIELSEN, EDITH 407017 9410754 GRUNZ, JONATHAN 407024 9410834 FRENCH, ERIC 407029 9410928 FRANK, CHARLES 407030 9410937 BREDAHL, MICHAEL 407078 9410909A LEE, JACQUILINE 407033 9411022 FREEMAN, LEONARD 407036 9411035 LARSON, SEAN 407039 9411118 SCOTT, JASON 407040 9411128 GROESS, MICHAEL 407047 9411261 SHAMP, KRISTIE 407048 9411329 FREEMAN, LEONARD 407053 9411368R HOEFS, LOUIS 407056 941139OR HALLGREN, STEPHEN 407060 9411443 GANZKOW, DEAN 407061 9411451 FERCHO, SHIRLEY 407062 9411452 LARSON, JAMES 407064 9411479 ZAPPA, MARY 407065 9411481 ROHR, SCOTT 407066 9411532 YERBICH, LORETTA 407067 9411533 LARSON, TOMMY 407069 9411590 WILLIAMS, DESSIE 407071 9411594 MONSON, MICHAEL 407073 9411611R VOIGHT, GEORGE 407074 9411615 BERRINI, MARLENE 6/17/94 v 1 472.60 6/19/94 y 1 444.20 6/19/94 x 1 239.20 6/19/94 p 1 479.70 6/21 /94 p 1 257.10 6/21/94 y 1 479.70 6/23/94 y 1 246.30 6/23/94 p 1 274.70 6/23/94 y 1 253.40 6/24/94 y 1 538.90 6/24/94 p 1 299.70 6/25/94 p 1 451.30 6/25/94 p 1 299.70 6/25/94 p 1 267.60 6/25/94 y 1 274.70 6/26/94 p 1 274.70 6/27/94 x 1 437.10 7/ 1/94 v 1 246.30 7/ 1/94 p 1 281.80 7/ 1/94 y 1 493.90 7/ 2/94 p 1 288.90 7/ 3/94 y 1 451.30 7/ 4/94 y 1 465.50 7/ 7/94 y 1 257.10 7/ 8/94 p 1 296.00 7/ 9/94 v 1 444.20 7/ 9/94 s 1 292.60 7/ 9/94 p 1 126.70 7/11/94 v 1 232.10 7/11/94 p 1 546.00 7/12/94 y 1 246.30 7/12/94 p 1 342.30 7/14/94 s 1 264.20 7/15/94 v 1 437.10 7/15/94 y 1 486.80 7/16/94 p 1 472.60 7/16/94 p 1 465.50 7/17/94 p 1 281.80 7/17/94 p 1 278.40 7/17/94 y 1 253.40 7/17/94 p 1 321.00 7/18/94 p 1 285.50 7/18/94 y 1 496.30 7/19/94 y 1 493.90 7/19/94 y 1 479.70 7/19/94 y 1 260.50 7/19/94 p 1 264.20 268.25 204.35 319.83 124.37 0.00 239.20 0.00 479.70 0.00 257.10 268.53 211.17 123.27 123.03 0.00 274.70 96.83 156.57 274.07 264.83 0.00 299.70 0.00 451.30 0.00 299.70 0.00 267.60 105.14 169.56 0.00 274.70 0.00 437.10 221.67 24.63 0.00 281.80 277.53 216.37 288.50 0.40 257.45 193.85 331.44 134.06 88.52 168.58 0.00 296.00 255.86 188.34 248.71 43.89 0.00 126.70 115.02 117.08 436.80 109.20 94.06 152.24 0.00 342.30 224.57 39.63 184.33 252.77 343.05 143.75 0.00 472.60 0.00 465.50 0.00 281.80 30.00 248.40 157.95 95.45 81.00 240.00 0.00 285.50 8.31 487.99 84.45 409.45 19.39 460.31 161.82 98.68 0.00 264.20 ( 6) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT 12:20 pm 12/15/93 TO 12/31/94 CALL PAT. NUMBER PATIENT NAME DATE F C CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE - - - - -- 407076 ----- - - - - -- 9411635R - -- --------- - - - - -- HOEFS, LOUIS - - - - - - -- -- 7/20/94 y - 1 -- - - - - -- 472.60 -- - - - - -- 335.31 -- - - - - -- 137.29 407082 9411677 HICKSON, JOHN 7/20/94 p 1 292.60 281.80 10.80 407083 9411677A OLSON, TAMARA 7/20/94 p 1 281.80 0.00 281.80 407084 9411677B HER, PLIA 7/20/94 x 1 299.70 0.00 299.70 407091 9411791 VOGELGESANG, WILLI 7/21/94 y 1 458.40 327.57 130.83 407102 941.1877 MORROW, VIVIAN 7/23/94 p 1 444.20 0.00 444.20 407105 9411859 SCHUMANN, RENEE 7/23/94 p 1 313.90 158.84 155.06 407106 9411905 GILBERTSON, ROBERT 7/23/94 p 1 264.20 131.36 132.84 407110 9411952 NELSON, WARREN 7/24194 v 1 444.20 209.90 234.30 407112 9411979 GIBBONS, TYLER 7/25/94 p 1 274.70 0.00 274.70 407114 9412052 GILLESPIE, CLIFFOR 7/26/94 p 1 274.70 0.00 274.70 407117 9412082 GONSER, LOIS 7/26/94 v 1 482.10 0.00 482.10 407120 9412149 GONSER, LOIS 7/27/94 v 1 482.10 0.00 482.10 407134 9412351 GONSER, LOIS 7/30/94 v 1 482.10 0.00 482.10 407136 9412396 LUDKE, JOAN 7/31/94 y 1 501.00 251.91 249.09 408003 9412525R WEFLIN, OLIVER 8/ 2/94 y 1 444.20 319.83 124.37 408005 9412575 CHAMBERLAIN, MARK 8/ 3/94 y 1 285.50 99.60 185.90 408006 9412577R KUEHLWEIN, WALTER 8/ 3/94 y 1 501.00 350.79 150.21 408008 9412668 MORAN, PENNY 8/ 4/94 x 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 408010 94.12691 KRUEGER, JASON 8/ 4/94 p 1 278.40 0.00 278.40 408011 9412693R ALEXANDER, EMMA 8/ 4/94 y 1 260.50 161.82 98.68 408016 9412738 SCHLADWEILER, GENE 8/ 5/94 y 1 267.60 135.04 132.56 408019 9412817 BUSHONG, RICHARD 8/ 6/94 y 1 472.60 335.31 137.29 408020 9412823 PINOTTI, THERESA 8/ 6/94 y 1 465.50 262.99 202.51 408024 9412879 DeYOUNG, FRANK 8/ 7/94 p 1 531.80 0.00 531.80 408026 9412909 LARSON, NICHOLI 8/ 7/94 p 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 408032 9413108 KENNEDY, JOSEPH 8/11/94 p 1 560.20 286.82 273.38 408035 9413130 BERG, MALCOLM 8/11/94 y 1 493.90 277.53 216.37 408046 9413244 FREEMAN, LEONARD 8/13/94 v 1 232.10 115.02 117.08 408047 9413249 BRISTL'IN JR., JACK 8/13/94 p 1 503.40 0.00 503.40 408051 9413303 ROSSOW, EVEYLN 8/13/94 y 1 296.00 144.94 151.06 408052 9413351 THRALL, MICHON 8/14/94 y 1 546.00 276.84 269.16 408054 9413402 BUELOW, PATTI 8/15/94 p 1 465.50 0.00 465.50 408062 9413371 LEO, FLORENCE 8/15/94 p 1 493.90 0.00 493.90 408058 9413433R HALLGREN, STEPHEN 8/16/94 v 1 472.60 0.00 472.60 408070 9413563 BRANDT, JEANNE 8/17/94 y 1 232.10 146.34 85.76 408071 9413601 DAVIS, DARYL 8/18/94 p 1 489.20 0.00 489.20 408072 9413611 SPRAKE, MYKEL 8/18/94 x 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 408073 9413634 SPRAKE, MYKEL 8/18/94 x 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 408076 9413650 KNOPF, CAROLINE 8/19/94 v 1 246.30 166.41 79.89 408080 9413719 VAN, TIMOTHY 8/20/94 p 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 408085 94137929 NEVIN, DOROTHY 8/21/94 y 1 465.50 331.44 134.06 408088 9413819 HERBST, KRISTINE 8/21/94 y 1 253.40 157.95 95.45 408091 9413846 LULOFF, AMANDA 8/21/94 p 1 321.00 256.80 64.20 408094 9413944 McKENZIE, EMMA 8/23/94 p 1 232.10 0.00 232.10 408098 9413981R KUEHLWEIN, WALTER 8/23/94 y 1 288.90 177.30 111.60 408106 9414119 MASON, CLAREASE 8/25/94 y 1 281.80 107.91 173.89 ( 7 ) ( 8) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT 12:20 pm 12/15/93 TO 12/31/94 CALL PAT. NUMBER PATIENT NAME DATE F C CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE - - - - -- 408109 ----- - - - - -- 9414145 -- -- -------- - - - - -- MARTIN, ZACHORY -- - - - - -- -- 8/25/94 s - -- - - - - -- 1 257.10 -- -- - - -- 215.68 -- - - - - -- 41.42 408112 9414274 PLADERS, LYNDA 8/27/94 x 1 458.40 0.00 458.40 408119 9414302 TRENT, LEONARD 8/27/94 y 1 246.30 94.06 152.24 408115 9414322 SCHLADWEILER, GENE 8/28/94 y 1 515.20 228.38 286.82 408122 9414431R LEE, JOHN 8/30/94 y 1 465.50 223.18 242.32 408124 9414433R WINKEL, JOHN 8/30/94 y 1 472.60 335.31 137.29 409008 9414424 GREEN, JAMES 8/30/94 y 1 328.10 116.22 211.88 408126 9414476 DUELL, MILDRED 8/31/94 y 1 451.30 258.96 192.34 409001 9414538 HOLES, KRISTA 9/1/94 p 1 299.70 0.00 299.70 409002 9414540 RIKKE, LAVERN 9/ 1/94 y 1 288.90 177.30 111.60 409004 9414566 MAZANEC, LILLIAN 9/ 1/94 y 1 501.00 280.63 220.37 409006 9414592 CAPAUL, MARTIN 9/ 1/94 v 1 482.10 0.00 482.10 409007 9414612R LEE, JOHN 9/ 1/94 y 1 232.10 75.25 156.85 409010 9414631R LEE, JOHN 9/ 2/94 y 1 458.40 220.17 238.23 409011 9414649 SMITH, SHAEN 9/ 2/94 y 1 246.30 154.08 92.22 409015 9414754R HALLGREN, STEPHEN 9/ 4/94 v 1 472.60 0.00 472.60 409020 9414875 SOURS, ROSEMARY 9/ 6/94 p 1 482.10 0.00 482.10 409021 9414885 GODBOUT, BRANDON 9/ 6/94 p 1 288.90 87.92 200.98 409043 9414884 LeFROOTH, APRIL 9/ 6/94 p 1 299.70 0.00 299.70 409031 9415084R HALLGREN, STEPHEN 9/10/94 v 1 493.90 0.00 493.90 409033 9415086 GERSTER, MARY 9/10/94 u 1 546.00 0.00 546.00 409035 9415108R BLISS, PETE P 9/10/94 v 1 246.30 123.27 123.03 409036 9415115 MERILL, SHIRLEY 9/10/94 y 1 267.60 165.69 101.91 409039 9415174 MILLER, FRANCIS 9/11/94 p 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 409040 9415192 BERG, MALCOLM 9/11/94 y 1 501.00 280.63 220.37 409041 9415195R HOEFS, LOUIS 9/12/94 y 1 267.60 165.69 101.91 409042 9415197 MORROW, STEVEN 9/12/94 s 1 560.20 476.17 84.03 409066 9415249 BUDKE, MICHELLE 9/12/94 p 1 458.40 0.00 458.40 409054 9415363 MORISSET, ANDREA 9/14/94 p 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 409055 9415368R NIELSEN, EDITH 9/15/94 y 1 472.60 335.31 137.29 409057 9415376 FREEMAN, LEONARD 9/15/94 v 1 437.10 184.33 252.77 409060 9415439 TOFSRUD, DeWAYNE 9/15/94 p 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 409100 9415411 JONES, BENJY 9/15194 p 1 285.50 0.00 285.50 409068 9415432 ROGERS, JOSEPH 9/16/94 v 1 458.40 366.72 91.68 409069 9415433 BULTMAN, CHRISTINE 9/16/94 y 1 479.70 268.53 211.17 409074 9415492 GILLESPIE, CLIFFOR 9/17/94 p 1 501.00 0.00 501.00 409076 94155198 McDONALD, HAZEL 9/17/94 y 1 472.60 335.31 137.29 409061 9415570 GRASSMAN, BRIAN 9/18/94 p 1 482.10 0.00 482.10 409064 9415642 JOHNSON, ROBERT 9/19/94 p 1 299.70 0.00 299.70 409085 9415669 HENRIKSEN, HUEY 9/20/94 s 1 299.70 254.75 44.95 409090 9415710 OVERLAND, DAVID 9/21/94 y 1 296.00 113.45 182.55 409091 9415718 SMITH, LATASHA 9/21/94 y 1 538.90 274.07 264.83 409094 9415749 HURST, VERALVILLE 9/22/94 p 1 285.50 0.00 285.50 409095 9415755 SOBANIA, CHERYL 9/22/94 p 1 288.90 0.00 288.90 409097 9415809 RYAN, RANDALL 9/22/94 p 1 260.50 234.45 26.05 409109 9415887 BEISSEL, CHAD 9/23/94 p 1 479.70 0.00 479.70 409103 9415912 MURPHY, DAN 9/24/94 y 1 437.10 315.96 121.14 ( 8) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT 12:20 pm 12/15/93 TO 12/31/94 CALL PAT. NUMBER PATIENT NAME DATE F C CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE 409104 9415936 ROSSOW, EVELYN 9/24/94 y 1 444.20 255.86 188.34 409107 9416041 POLSKI, MICHAEL 9/25/94 y 1 313.90 110.68 203.22 409112 9416090 LEE, SONG 9/27/94 y 1 458.40 2.77 455.63 409117 9416124 HEIDENREICH, THOMA 9/28/94 p 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 409118 9416127R HOEFS, LOUIS 9/28/94 y 1 472.60 335.31 137.29 409121 9416140 BUERSKEN, LACIE 9/28/94 y 1 296.00 113.45 182.55 409126 9416250 HOPKINS, EFFIE 9/30/94 y 1 486.80 343.05 143.75 409128 9416264 DUNKLE, LEAH 9/30/94 y 1 444.20 319.83 124.37 410007 9416454 NDUMBE, JETTIE 10/ 4/94 y 1 274.70 105.14 169.56 410011 9416470 HUMPREY, MELVIN 10/ 4/94 v 1 489.20 89.20 400.00 410014 9416507 BEAMAN, MELISSA 10/ 5/94 p 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 410015 9416512 ALIPERTO, JOE 10/ 5/94 y 1 451.30 323.70 127.60 410016 9416516 DERROSSET, BARBARA 10/5/94 p 1 281.80 0.00 281.80 410019 9416570 TRUAX, JOANNE 10/ 6/94 y 1 465.50 265.15 200.35 410020 9416575 FINCEL, GEORGE 10/ 6/94 s 1 510.50 433.93 76.57 410021 9416576 RITCHIE, BETTY 10/ 6/94 v 1 493.90 0.00 493.90 410023 9416582 NADEAU, THOMAS 10/ 6/94 x 1 232.10 0.00 232.10 410024 0416633R STOKVIS, LUDWIG 10/ 7/94 y 1 472.60 268.25 204.35 410029 9416734 HENDRICKS, JEFFREY 10/ 8/94 y 1 285.50 99.60 185.90 410033 9416758 HOOT, RAYMOND 10/ 9/94 r 1 465.50 349.13 116.37 410035 9416774 MERILL, SHIRLEY 10/ 9/94 y 1 458.40 327.57 130.83 410040 9416814R STOKVIS, LUDWIG 10/10/94 y 1 472.60 268.25 204.35 410045 9416954 ENGEBRETSON, JUDY 10/13/94 s 1 328.10 278.89 49.21 410046 9416956 ANDERSON, DAWN 10/13/94 y 1 437.10 251.91 185.19 410047 9416976 BAILEY, EVELYN 10/13/94 y 1 246.30 154.08 92.22 410048 9416981 MOTZ, BRAD 10/13/94 p 1 260.50 208.40 52.10 410049 9416967 KAUFENBERG, PAUL 10/13/94 p 1 508.10 508.00 0.10 410051 9417019 POLSKI, MICHAEL 10/14/94 y 1 546.00 276.84 269.16 410059 9417165 LEURER, ARLENE 10/16/94 y 1 444.20 319.83 124.37 410062 9417255 BUERSKEN, LACIE 10/18/94 y 1 281.80 107.91 173.89 410063 9417277 LONG, DAVID 10/18/94 p 1 444.20 0.00 444.20 410067 9417339 FARRIS, VIRGINIA 10/20/94 p 1 246.30 0.00 246.30 410069 9417365 DeROSSATT, BARBARA 10/20/94 p 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 410075 9417409 FARRIS, VIRGINIA 10/20/94 p 1 260.50 0.00 260.50 410083 9417504 KLANDE, EVELYN 10/22/94 y 1 267.60 132.56 135.04 410085 9417512 MILLER, EMILY 10/22/94 x 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 410086 9417549 VANGEEST, RENEE 10/22/94 x 1 546.00 0.00 546.00 410089 9417625 GEORGE, KHADIJIA 10/24/94 p 1 321.00 0.00 321.00 410090 9417660 NELSON, NANCY 10/25/94 p 1 281.80 0.00 281.80 410091 9417662 BOROS, JOSEPH 10/25/94 p 1 246.30 246.29 0.01 410100 9417756 PRIEBE, EDNA 10/27/94 y 1 458.40 275.22 183.18 410105 9417820 YOUNG, GY 10/28/94 y 1 510.50 262.99 247.51 410106 9417845 JONES, THERESA 10/28/94 p 1 267.60 0.00 267.60 410108 9417896 RICH, DIONNE 10/30/94 y 1 281.80 107.91 173.89 410110 9417928 FINBERG, PHILLIP 10/30/94 p 1 465.50 0.00 465.50 410113 9417969 COY, MARVIN 10/31/94 p 1 472.60 0.00 472.60 410114 9417988 SELLECK, RONALD 10/31/94 p 1 264.20 0.00 264.20 ( 9) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT 12:20 pm 12/15/93 TO 12/31/94 CALL PAT. NUMBER PATIENT NAME DATE F C CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE 411002 9418049A PRITZEL, JEROME 11/ 1/94 x 1 162.20 0.00 162.20 411004 9418084 OLSEN, JAMES 11/ 2/94 y 1 296.00 113.45 182.55 411008 9418176 CHILDS, MINDY 11/ 3/94 p 1 465.50 0.00 465.50 411010 9418197 JOHNSON, JOHN 11/ 4/94 y 1 501.00 350.79 150.21 411014 9418223R HOEFS, LOUIS 11/ 4/94 y 1 472.60 268.25 204.35 411015 9418246 GARRISON, ELLEN 11/ 5/94 y 1 501.00 238.22 262.78 411019 9418310 PINEAULT, NATHAN 11/ 6/94 x 1 313.90 0.00 313.90 411020 9418321 ROMERO, GREGORY 11/ 6/94 p 1 496.30 397.04 99.26 411024 9418355 DENNEY, LEONARD 11/ 7/94 v 1 288.90 0.00 288.90 411025 9418359 SCHIARIZZI, JOSEPH 11/ 7/94 x 1 496.30 0.00 496.30 411029 9418384R DUREN, RICHARD 11/ 7/94 y 1 486.80 274.44 212.36 411033 9418525 GANZ, AUSTIN 11/10/94 p 1 153.40 0.00 153.40 411036 9418535 WESSELL, JULIE 11/10/94 y 1 306.80 138.75 168.05 411041 9418677 STEVENS, JOANNE 11/13/94 y 1 553.10 279.61 273.49 411045 9418661 DELISLE, BERTHA 11/13/94 y 1 260.50 129.46 131.04 411047 9418764 ALBAUGH, JOANN 11/15/94 y 1 246.30 154.08 92.22 411050 9418739 MALLOY, MARY 11/15/94 y 1 458.40 260.22 198.18 411052 9418760 FELDE, VICTOR 11/15/94 v 1 503.40 0.00 503.40 411057 9418861R JOST, RAYMOND 11/17/94 x 1 451.30 0.00 451.30 411061 9418902 O'NEIL, SUSAN 11/17/94 s 1 306.80 260.78 46.02 411062 9418924R MOEN, CHARLES 11/18/94 y 1 296.00 144.94 151.06 411064 9418934R BLISS, PETE P 11/18/94 v 1 260.50 129.46 131.04 411066 9418958 CHILDS, MINDY 11/18/94 p 1 437.10 0.00 437.10 411068 9418918 KANNER, ZACHARY 11/18/94 x 1 465.50 0.00 465.50 411069 9418986 BENNETT, MICHELLE 11/18/94 y 1 303.10 88.52 214.58 411074 9419089 LARSON, BARBARA 11/20/94 y 1 458.40 327.57 130.83 411076 9419106R ALBRECHT, ANNA 11/20/94 y 1 486.80 274.44 212.36 411082 9419142 HUBERTY, LEE 11/21/94 y 1 296.00 113.45 182.55 411088 9419183 MILLER, EMILY 11/22/94 x 1 458.40 0.00 458.40 411089 9419197 DONOVAN, LARRY 11/22/94 s 1 271.30 230.61 40.69 411090 9419198 THOMPSON, SACHEENA 11/22/94 y 1 267.60 102.37 165.23 411091 94192 -18 HUTCHEWS, JENNIFER 11/22/94 p 1 288.90 0.00 288.90 411096 9419312 MILLER, GERRIANNE 11/24/94 y 1 531.80 271.30 260.50 411097 9419313R NICHOLS, IVA 11/24194 y 1 472.60 268.25 204.35 411098 9419316 BAKER, PATRICIA 11/24/94 y 1 274.70 105.14 169.56 411105 9419371 McGUIRE, MARSHA 11/25/94 p 1 486.80 0.00 486.80 411107 9419423 BOVEE, ERICA 11/26/94 p 1 292.60 0.00 292.60 411111 9419508R FISCHER, HERMAN 11/27/94 y 1 472.60 226.19 246.41 411112 9419522 MICHAEL, KATHY 11/28/94 s 1 278.40 218.53 59.87 411114 9419535R DUREN, RICHARD 11/28/94 y 1 486.80 274.44 212.36 41.1115 9419550 BARTHOLOMEW, SCOTT 11/28/94 y 1 288.90 110.68 178.22 411117 9419580 NELSON, DAVID 11/29/94 y 1 560.20 282.38 277.82 412004 9419725 BIBEAU, ANNETTE 12/ 2/94 y 1 479.70 192.34 287.36 412005 9419726 STEELE, CECELIA 12/ 2/94 y 1 257.10 88.52 168.58 412011 9419786 STREAM, JORDAN 12/ 3/94 x 1 274.70 0.00 274.70 412014 9419800 MCARTOR, CORY 12/ 3/94 y 1 267.60 102.37 165.23 412016 9419820 REYES, NICHOLE 12/ 4/94 y 1 501.00 276.84 224.16 ( 10 ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12/ 6/96 CALL REPORT 12:20 pm 12/15/93 TO 12/31/94 CALL PAT. NUMBER PATIENT NAME DATE F C CHARGES CREDITS BALANCE - - - - -- ----- - - - - - - ------------ - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 412032 9419971 DAHLSTROM, LAWRENC 12/ 7/94 v 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 412043 9420096 DOUGLAS, DAVID 12/ 9/94 p 1 146.30 0.00 146.30 412045 9420096B KLUK, KAREN 12/ 9/94 y 1 264.20 91.29 172.91 412056 9420110 STREETER, DORRIAN 12/ 9/94 x 1 271.30 0.00 271.30 412053 9420199 GLIBRAS, SAMUEL 12/11/94 p 1 472.60 0.00 472.60 412054 9420204 GOTTFRIED, SHELDON 12/11/94 y 1 458.40 327.57 130.83 412057 9420211R McDONALD, HAZEL 12/11/94 y 1 472.60 335.31 137.29 412060 9420252 TOVSEN, NICHOLAS 12/12/94 y 1 531.80 271.30 260.50 412061 9420254 WDOWYCHYN, JOHN 12/12/94 s 1 257.10 222.91 34.19 412062 9420276 HODGES, MICHELLE 12/12/94 y 1 288.90 110.68 178.22 412063 9420284 ANDERSON, CECIL 12/12/94 v 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 412067 9420370 BUZGAN, MIHAIELA 12/12/94 y 1 517.60 265.76 251.84 412064 9420299R McDONALD, HAZEL 12/13/94 y 1 486.80 343.05. 143.75 412065 9420303 RIKKE, LAVERN 12/13/94 y 1 281.80 173.43 108.37 412069 9420387 RICHARD, BENNY 12/14/94 p 1 451.30 0.00 451.30 412070 9420398 ADESHINA, ELIZABET 12/15/94 p 1 274.70 274.00 0.70 412074 9420437 BLOM, TIMOTHY 12/15/94 x 1 465.50 0.00 465.50 412078 9420487 PATRIN, EMILY 12/16194 y 1 482.10 251.91 230.19 412080 9420521 DAHLSTROM, LAWRENC 12/17/94 v 1 246.30 0.00 246.30 412081 9420524 MAHNKE, MARIE 12/17/94 y 1 253.40 126.36 127.04 412082 9420525 RIKKE, LaVERN 12/17/94 y 1 267.60 165.69 101.91 412086 9420580 GARGARO, PAUL 12/18/94 p 1 313.90 25.00 288.90 412090 9420610 BAILEY, HEATHER 12/19/94 p 1 271.30 205.86 65.44 412091 9420616 CHRISTENSEN, SARA 12/19/94 y 1 486.80 208.35 278.45 412100 9420695 SMITH, LATASHA 12/20/94 y 1 531.80 271.30 260.50 412102 9420733 PAULSON, ROGER 12/21/94 p 1 444.20 255.86 188.34 412103 9420759 HILL, ROSEMARY 12/21/94 y 1 239.20 150.21 88.99 412101 9420763R BLISS, PETE P 12/22/94 v 1 451.30 258.96 192.34 412109 9420804 KANIS, CRAIG 12/22/94 u 1 271.30 0.00 271.30 412117 9420898 STAMPER, DONNA 12/23/94 y 1 239.20 91.29 147.91 412120 9420944 WHARTON, EMILY 12/24/94 p 1 281.80 253.62 28.18 412121 9420959 PEREZ, ISAAC 12/25/94 p 1 253.40 0.00 253.40 412125 9420974 SMITH, IRIS 12/25/94 y 1 510.50 265.15 245.35 412128 9420998 ERICKSON, JAZMIN 12/26/94 y 1 274.70 105.14 169.56 412132 9421024 CERMAK, ALICE 12/26/94 y 1 458.40 260.22 198.18 412136 9421047 ZOPF, DONALD 12/27/94 p 1 486.80 0.00 486.80 412137 9421066 HANSON, CARLITA 12/27/94 p 1 257.10 0.00 257.10 412146 9421137R WAHLBERG, JESSIE 12/29/94 y 1 246.30 154.08 92.22 412147 9421138 MOORE, EVE 12/29/94 y 1 444.20 319.83 124.37 412149 9421145 KISLENGER, KIMBERL 12/29194 p 1 567.30 0.00 567.30 412156 9421208 CRANDALL, IVY 12/30/94 y 1 444.20 319.83 124.37 412157 9421234 RIEBE, TIMOTHY 12/31/94 p 1 264.20 211.36 52.84 412160 9421243R GIERASIMZUK, JOZEP 12/31194 y 1 281.80 173.43 108.37 412161 9421246 LETOURNEAU, OTTO 12/31/94 y 1 472.60 268.25 204.35 412163 9421258 PETERSON, LETA 12/31/94 p 1 501.00 150.00 351.00 412164 9421263 HINSJOS, MARIO 12/31/94 p 1 501.00 400.80 100.20 TOTALS 188614.80 66869.28 121745.52 ( 11 ) AGENDA NO. %Taw *3 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: REVISION OF PROCEDURES FOR CANCELLATION OF AMBULANCE BILLS DATE: December 2, 1996 PROPOSAL Action by Council Endorsed Modif Rejected. Da �.., It is proposed that the Council discuss criteria for determining when an ambulance bill should be cancelled that would include an income limit and a limit on countable net assets. BACKGROUND The City of Maplewood has used the attached Application for Cancellation of Paramedic Ambulance Service Charges form for several years. At the 10 -28 -96 council meeting, staff was directed to develop a criteria for determining when an ambulance bill should be cancelled. On 11 -27 -96 1 discussed this issue with Dale Carlson. He suggested that an income limit be established based on the federal poverty guidelines. He also suggested that an asset limit be established. Details on Dale Carlson's suggestions are attached. A criteria for determining when an ambulance bill should be cancelled would insure that the Council makes consistent decisions on ambulance bill cancellations. Key issues for the Council to discuss and decide are the following: 1. Should an income limit be established? Should it be based on the federal poverty or other guidelines? What deductions will be eligible for calculating the countable income? What will the countable income limit be? 2. Should an asset limit be established? What assets will be counted? What liabilities will be eligible for calculating countable net assets? What will the countable net assets limit be? RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council discuss criteria for determining when an ambulance bill should be cancelled that would include an income Limit and a limit on countable net assets. P:IFINANCEIWPIAGN\AMBCAN.WPD APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF PARAMEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE CHARGES NAM OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PATIENT'S NAME: DATE OF SERVICE: AMOUNT OF CHARGES REQUESTED TO BE CANCELLED: - �r��r�w�rw.r.��wArw�wwrw wwr- � l wi.ri rr =wr-rrw- rwrwwww.rw -- ri �. w =�.rrrrr►=iww�.rwrrr�.- wrw�... �w� REASON FOR REQUEST - CHECK ONE: I. Financial Hardship (fill out reverse side: 2. Other: I certify that the income information I have supplied on this application is true and accurate. - i also certify that the amount of the charges requested 9 4 to be cancelled are not covered by Medical assistance, worker's compensation, Medicare, health insurance or auto insurance. Signed: Date: INCOME INFORMATION "INCOME" means any amount received from the following sources by any Resident: • Any Public Assistance, including but • Salaries, including commissions, bonuses, not limited to Welfare, AFDC, SSI, and overtime pay and tips Unemployment Compensation Interest and Dividends • Pensions and Annuities, including PERA and Social Security • Rental income • Estate or Trust income • Business Profit- -for self - employed individuals, including Farmers • Gain from the sale of property or securities • Payments received from properties being sold on Contracts for Deed • VA Educational Grants List all residents of your household. Include yourself. Include their ages and their incomes (if any): I.) Income listed shoul d include al 1 income which your household can reasonable expect to receive during the next 12 months. 2) "'RESIDENT" means any person, other than a renter, living in the household for at least 9 months of the year, or a person who is claimed as a dependent for income tax purposes. NAME OF AGE OF INCOME OF RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT SOURCE OF INCOME (per month) (including employer's address, if applicable) TOTAL INCOME: per month= per year '9 Dan, ID:E EA HI: MIN FAX :612-4504-2709 PAGE 2 The, followin sheet has the various income limi for different a and famil size. You Will note, for example, pre woman have a hi incorne standard than non-pre adults. I would su that we keep it simple. Possibl usin the 185% of federal povert g uidelines. We could also establish an asset limit, but limit it to li assets, not count cars homes, etc. Medical Assistance has different asset limits dependin of-) the famil composition. For instance, families with children do not have asset limits. In determinin countable income, we should consider some deductions. We could have a simple worksheet that lists monthl g ross income and subtract a work deduction to account for taxes, da expenses and re monthl medical expenses not covered b insurance. I am thinkin for . example, of seniors who have Medicare onl who need prescriptions each month not covered b Medicare. Also followin is a su worksheet to do eli calculation. I hope this helps. Let me know if y ou need additional information. FAMILY MoN'T$Ly 6 MONTH S I ZE STANDARD STANDARD 1 MA j GAXC I NCO S TANi�ARD S Rev. 6 15 /96 SCBEDUIX A ScamuLE C t 709 FAMILIES AND C8 I LDREId PREG3�CA�ifi' W0 AND INFANTS SCHEDULE E Sc HEDU7jE QMH 133 1 OF TAE �II�D ER AGE 1'W� CHILDREN AGE 6 & 0 144 $ CAF FED ERAL PQVER.TY AFDC GRANT STANDARD 2 7 5 W OF FEDERAL PaVERTy $O RN ON ©R AFTER 10 100 GUIDELINES EFFECTIVE 7 1 87 j GUIDEL I NES EFF' . 4/ l/96 OF FEDERAL PO VERTY GUIDELINES E FFEC:T I VE 4/1/9 9 1,346 EFFEeTIVE 4/1 j 19 6 10 FAMILY MoN'T$Ly 6 MONTH S I ZE STANDARD STANDARD 1 467 2 802 2 583 3 3 709 4,254 4 828 4 f 96 8 5 929 5,574 6 1 x 034 6,180 7 1,133 6,798 a Ir 221 7,326 9 1,346 7 10 1,380 8 Addit s, 7 1 426 SEDULE B 1 T .t _ AGED r BLIND OR DISABLED I MARR IED► COUPLES. AND SIDOLE PERSONS 120% OF THE AFDC GRAFT 17 r 850 STANDARD 3 r 57 21 EFFECTIVE 7 /l/9-0 4 FAMILY MONTHLY 6 MONTE SIZE STANDARD STANDARD 1 420 2 2 524 3x 144 3 638 3,828 4 745 4 S 836 5,016 6 928 Sr669 7 If 6,120 8 1.098 6,r594 9 1, 176 7,056 .10 .1 2 42 7,452 Add.it . 64 384 FAMILY MONTHLY 6 MONTH SIZE STANDARD STANDARD 1 1 x 774 10,644 " 2 2 r 374 14..244 3 2 r 975 17 r 850 4 3 r 57 21 5 4 25 6 4 , 7 ? 28,656 7 5 32 8 S 977 35,862 . 9 6 39 r 462 10 7 43 j Q68 Addit 600 3 f 600 *The f ami lY B , ze for a pregnant woman is always a minimum of 2. FAMILY SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Addit ip MONTHLY STANDARD 645 863 1, 082 1 f 3 00. 1 1 r 737 1 2 2 2 218 SC$EDULE QWD 20 01 OF FEI] ERAL POVERTY GUIDESZNES EFFECTIVE 4/1/96 FAMILY S1 ZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Add it . MONTHLY STANDARD I { 290 1,727 2,163 2,600 3 3 3, 910 4, 347 437 6 MONTH. STANDARD 3 5 6,492 7 1 800 9 10 11 13 r 038 14 15,660 1,p 308 FAlfiILY SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Add it a. SCEZDULE SIm 1201 OF FEDERAL P OVZRTY GUIDELINES EF' ECTIVE 4/1/ FAMILY S Z zE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Addit. MONTHLY S TA MARD 774 1,036 1,298 1 r 560 1 2 , 484 2 r 346 2 f 608 262 MONTHLY STANDARD 545 863 2.082 1 1,518 1,737 1,966 2,173 2 2 21.8 SCSEDULE EXT -MA 1 OF FEDERAL POVZRTY GUIDELINES EFFECTIVE 4/1/96 FAMILY SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 14 Addit. Nfl NTELY STANDARD 1,193 1,597 2 2 f 405 2 3, 213 3,617 4 4 r 425 4 404 d - b / I n 1. s t. a a s d, . do S ULZ D AGES TWO THROUGH FIVE YEARS 13 3 OF FF-DLR,AL POVERTY GUIDELINES EFFECTIVE 4/1/ FAMILY MONTHLY 6 MONTH SIZE STANDARD ST ANDARD 1 858 5,148 2 1,148 6,888 3 1,439 8,634 4 1..729 10, 3 74 5 2 , 019 12,214 6 2 13 7 2 644 15.600 8 2 x.7,,346 Addit, - 290 1,740 FAMILY SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Addit ip MONTHLY STANDARD 645 863 1, 082 1 f 3 00. 1 1 r 737 1 2 2 2 218 SC$EDULE QWD 20 01 OF FEI] ERAL POVERTY GUIDESZNES EFFECTIVE 4/1/96 FAMILY S1 ZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Add it . MONTHLY STANDARD I { 290 1,727 2,163 2,600 3 3 3, 910 4, 347 437 6 MONTH. STANDARD 3 5 6,492 7 1 800 9 10 11 13 r 038 14 15,660 1,p 308 FAlfiILY SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Add it a. SCEZDULE SIm 1201 OF FEDERAL P OVZRTY GUIDELINES EF' ECTIVE 4/1/ FAMILY S Z zE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Addit. MONTHLY S TA MARD 774 1,036 1,298 1 r 560 1 2 , 484 2 r 346 2 f 608 262 MONTHLY STANDARD 545 863 2.082 1 1,518 1,737 1,966 2,173 2 2 21.8 SCSEDULE EXT -MA 1 OF FEDERAL POVZRTY GUIDELINES EFFECTIVE 4/1/96 FAMILY SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 14 Addit. Nfl NTELY STANDARD 1,193 1,597 2 2 f 405 2 3, 213 3,617 4 4 r 425 4 404 d - b / I n 1. s t. a a s d, . do l i • �.. ♦ ..lf - ��r • r �i • 1 •.x. 1 '1 1 f�•�[ 1 1 �� 1 1 ii i • rr "' 1 ►.+ 1 '•a ���..� (• �� F List all mon y gross income. Please provide verification such as pay stubs or other statements. Gross earned Income Child Support Workers Compensation Re impla yment Insurance Social Security -Pension Ot he r unearned in come Tot al Monthly Income Deductions 20% of gro earned income daycare (provide receipts) unreimbursed monthly medical bills. (provide receipts) Net countable income `leas list all liquid assets for all household farnily members and current balan Provide current balance statements. b ank accounts stocks bonds mutual funds other AGENDA NO r . AGENDA REPORT TO: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager FROM: Craig W. Dawson, Assistant City Manager RE: Set Meeting with Legislators DATE: December 9, 1996 INTRODUCTION ,fit -off. ,�3 �,ounc, 1 . Endorsed... Modifle��. Rejected .-- Date The City Council has generally held a meeting with legislators prior to or early in the legislative session, and the Council has expressed an interest in such a meeting around the beginning of the 1997 session. ACTION It is difficult to coordinate the schedules of 15 people during the holidays and early in the session. A meeting later in the session can be problematic, too. In late January 1996, only one legislator showed up to an 8:00 a.m. session to meet with Council and staff. It is suggested that the Council set a date to invite legislators to meet with them, and to select a time that would appear likely that legislators could be available. Suggested dates and times are: Thursday, December 19, 5:30 p.m. Monday, December 23, 6:00 p.m. Thursday, January 9, 5:30 p.m. Monday, January 13, 6:00 p.m. Thursday, January 23, 5:30 p.m. Monday, January 27, 6:00 p.m. Legislators representing parts of Maplewood are: Sen. Linda Runbeck Dist. 53 Rep. Sherry Broecker Dist. 53A Sen. John Marty Dist. 54 Rep. Mindy Greiling Dist. 54B Sen. Chuck Wiger Dist. 55 Rep. Betty McCollum Dist. 55B Sen. Len Price Dist. 57 Rep. Nora Slawik Dist. 57A s Acty_mgr \legismtg. d09