HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 02-27 City Council Packet6:00 p.m. CouncillManager Workshop
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. K80nd@y, February 27, 2008
Council Chambers, City N8U
K8R9Ling No. 08-04
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Acknowledgement oy Maplewood Residents Serving the Country
Mayor's Address on Protocol:
'Welcome to the meeting ofthe Maplewood City Council, It is our desire to keep all discussions civil oawe work through
difficult issues tonight If you are here for a Public Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with
the Policies and Procedures and Rules of Civility, which one /bmebed near the entrance. When you aoMneoo the council,
please state your name and address clearly for the record. All commentsIquestions shall be posed to the Mayor and
Council. I then will direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments.'
E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Clarification Of Minutes from the January 23.2O00 City Council Meeting
2. Minutes from the February 13 Council Manager Workshop
3. Minutes from the February 13, 2006 City Council Meeting
H. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered toba routine by the City Council and will bm enacted byone
motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will
be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
3. Final Fqat— yWapletre9 TOvvnhVm98 C2811 — 2827 SVith|8wn Drive)
3. Purchase of Police Vehicles
4. Acceptance Of2005 Justice Assistance Grant
5. Acceptance Of2O05 Buffer Zone Protection Plan Grant
0. Carry Over of2OO5 Appropriations LO2O00
Y. Approve Purchase of Single-Axle Plow Truck Body and Plow/Wing Attachment
8. Approve Sewer Use/Connection Agreement with the City of Woodbury — North of Highwood
Avenue
9. VenbVrg/Gu|d8n8T.H. 01 Frontage Road —City Project 04-04 — Resolution h]r Modification of
Existing Construction Contract, Change Orders 1`2. and 3
10. Gladstone North Area Street Improvements —City Project 04-15 — Resolution for Modification Of
Existing Construction Contract, Change Orders 2 and 3
11. Purchasing Policies and Procedures
12. Transportation Alliance Resolution
PUBLIC HEARINGS
7:00 p.m. Reduced Front Yard Setback Authorization (2413 Linwood Avenue)
MCC Pool Ceiling Painting
K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
TH 5 and TH 120 Property Owned by MnDOT — City Project 03-20 — Approve Resolution Calling
Public Hearing for March 13 to Review Marsh 212 and Hill - Murray School's Concepts for
Property Usage
L. NEW BUSINESS
1. Intoxicating Liquor License — Off-Sale — Blianchong Lor - Lor's Liquor Store
2. Intoxicating Liquor License — On-Sale — Jill Skogheim — 5-8 Tavern & Grill
3. City Code Amendment — Nonconforming Uses (First Reading)
4. Preliminary Approval for Issuance of Bonds and Equipment Certificates
1. Set Date for Council/Staff Retreat
2. Canvass of Election Results Monday, March 6th, 5:00 p.m.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this
service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 249-2001 to make arrangements.
Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials,
staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner.
We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for
each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language.
Agenda Item E1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: February 21, 200E
RE: Clarification of Minutes
Background
At the January 23` council meeting Councilmember Bartol moved that the minutes be revised with
two additions requested by Mayor Longrie and brought back to the February 27` meeting for final
approval. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Juenemann and carried by ayes all.
Introduction
The first addition was on Page 12 of the minutes. Item K1. Campaign Policy. Mayor Longrie
requested further verbiage of what City Attorney Kelly explained as follows:
'hat Statute 44 pertaining to civil service employees does not apply to Maplewood's paid-per-call
firefighters and that if Statute 44 does not apply to Maplewood's pay-per-call firefighters then there
would not or could not be a violation of the Statute as outlined in the internal investigation.
After review of the audio tape with City Attorney Patrick Kelly, the above language has been added
and is submitted to council for approval.
The second change was on Page 15 of the minutes. Item L_4 Maple Tree Group Home — CUP
Review. Mayor Longrie requested that the following be added to the minutes:
Councilmember Hjelle's findings of denial also include the finding of the Planning Commission
from the November 15, 2004 meeting as a basis of the findings for the denial.
After review of the audio tape with City Attorney Kelly, the record does not reflect the above
statement from Mr. Hjelle in the Findings of Denial. But is already a part of the minutes as a Finding
of Denial made by Councilmember Bartol.
Recommendation
Correct the minutes to reflect the change as requested by Mayor Longrie to Item Kl . Campaign
Policy.
MINUTES
CITY COUNCILIMANAGER WORKSHOP
Monday, February 13, 2006
Council Chambers, City Hall
6:00 p.m.
A. CALL TO
A
Relwen
Diana Lon(
David Bart
Erik Hjelle,
Kathleen J
Will Rossb
Others Pre
City Mana(
REaL Dire(
IT Director
Planner R(
C. APPROV,
Mayor Lon
as
U
BU%c
Pla
Planner Robe
vacancies on
The decision of the
City Council meeting
FUTURE TOPICS
Agenda Item E2
iews
ntroduced the report to the council who conducted the interviews for
, Planning Commission and Community Design Review Board.
cil will be announced and appointments will be made at the following
1. Council Retreat
2. Democratic Governance
F. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Longrie adjourned at 6:47 p.m.
Agenda Item E3
DRAFT-MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, February 13, 2006
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 06-03
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the City Hall, and was called to
order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Longrie.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
Diana Longrie, Mayor
David Bartol, Councilmember
Erik Hjelle, Councilmember
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember
Will Rossbach, Councilmember
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Mayor Longrie moved to approve the agenda as amended.
M1. Workshop
M2. Rush Line Corridor Task Force
M3. Locate Task Force
M4. Reconsideration of Mapletree CUP
M5 Update RWSC Commission
M6. Petition Update
M7. Class B City Update
M8. Presidents Visit
Mg. Special Election Reminder
M10. Manor's Forum
ded by Councilmember Bartol Ayes-All
ANNEET'' •
1. Minutes from the January 23, 2006 Council/Manager Workshop
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the minutes from the January 23, 2006
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All
2. Minutes from the January 23, 2006 City Council Meeting
Councilmember Bartol moved to approve the draft of the January 23, 2006 City Council
Meeting as a The minutes will be revised as requested and brought back to the
February 27 City Council Meeting for final approval.
City Council Meeting 02-13-06
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
Mayor Longrie moved to adopt the following resolution of appreciation for Erik Ahlness for his
years of service on the Maplewood Planning Commission
JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION 06 -02 -024
•' •
John Thein, Superintendent of School District 623 introduced himself to council and thanked
the various city employees for their continued assistance to, and support of, the school district.
2. Kevin Schmidt, 1800 Phalen Place, Maplewood, was present to discuss fair campaign practices.
El
i✓
0
rA
Judith Johannessen, addressed the council about the petition
Council Meeting.
Paul Nolan, 498 East Roselawn, addressed a typo on a
prompted the petition Ms. Johannessen presented.
Dean Wohlhuter, 1024 Marnie Street South,
candidates about water quality.
Dave Hafner, 1037 Marnie Street, expresse
former City Commissioners and Boardmem
Richard Dawson, 1630 Summit, St. Paul Park didn't f
people to discourage residents to vote for a particular
0
paign lite
ncilmembers
been
isitor presentations was the forum for
,.. =
1. City Engineers Association of Minnesota Project of the Year Award — Maplewood Mall
Area Transportation Improvements
a. City Engineer AN presented the report.
Mayor Longrie accepted the plaque on behalf of the city which will be posted in the lobby of
the Public Works building.,
2. Resolution of Appreciation — Eric Ahlness'
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report.
WHEREAS, Eric Ahlness has been a member of the Maplewood Planning Commission
since September 27, 2004, and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present tune; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has appreciated his experience, insights and good
judgment and
WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, without compensation, for the
betterment of the City of Maplewood; and
at the January 23r City
d questioned what
one of the
City Council Meeting 02 -13 -06
WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consistently
contributed his leadership, time and effort for the benefit of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBYRESOT VED for and on behalf Qf the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota and its citizens, that Eric Ahlness is hereby extended our heartfelt
gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service, and we wish him continued success in the
future.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All
3. Planning Commission Appointments
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Mayor Longrie presented specifics from the report.
Mayor Longrie moved to appoint Gary Pearson, ,Michael Grover and Harlan Hess to the
Maplewood Planning Commission
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All
4. Community Design Review Board Appointments
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Mayor Longrie presented specifics from the report.
Mayor Longrie moved to appoint John Hinzman, Ananth Shankar and Joel Schurke to the
Maplewood Community Design Review Beard
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All
H. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt consent agenda items 1 -5, 7 -9, 12 -14, and 16 -17.
Seconded by Mayor Longrie Ayes-All
Mayor Longrie moved to adopt consent agenda item 6.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
Mayor Longrie moved to adopt consent agenda item 10.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
Mayor Longrie moved to adopt consent agenda item 11.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
Mayor Longrie moved to adopt consent agenda item 15.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
City Council Meeting 02 -13 -06 3
Mayor LOngrie moved to adopt consent agenda item 18.
Seconded hvCoUn[i|nlernb8rRossb8ch |
1. Approval of C|8i[n3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 53.081.58
Manual Checks #09082
dated 01/17/08
$ 802.298.67
Checks #090O3Lhru #08105
dated 01/20/00thru 01/24/06
$ 280.885.67
Disbursements via debits 0] checking account
dated 01/13/00thru 01/19/06
$ 119.00
Manual Checks #8S1UOthnJ#O91O7
dated 01/25/06
$ 8.90
EFT #8S108
dated 01/31/06
dated 01/31/06
$ 119,70
checking account
dated 01/20/06 thru 01/26/06
69155
dated 01/27/06 thru 01/30/06
dated 02/07/06
$]
via debits to checking account
dated 01/27/06thru 02/02/06
Total Accounts Payable
$5
PAYROLL
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
$ 001.813.34 01/27X08
$ 2 Payroll Deduction check #1O4013th[U#1O4012
dated 01/27/06
City Council Meeting 02-13-06 4
GRAND TOTAL
2. Amendment k} School District 022 Cooperative Facility Use Agreement
Adopted an amendment to the School District 622 Cooperative Facility Use Agreement.
3. Amendment to School District 623 Cooperative Facility Use Agreement
Adopted an amendment the School District 023 Cooperative Facility Use Agreement.
' Map F Re Assoc —By Add
-=w
Adopted the new bylaw "Atic|eXV|I-DisSO addition into the Maplewood ghbana
Relief Association Bylaws.
5. /\ninla| Control Contract
Accepted the 2006 contract from Animal Control Services, Inc.
6. Donation from Schmelz
Accepted the donation of $2,500.00 from S
7. Annual Li cense
Adopted the following resolution approvin
operate at Garrity's at 1696 White Bear A
lkswagen.
8G8Dlb|iOg Reso Merrick Companies bJ
�RE SOLUTION
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the
premises permit for lawful gambling is for Merrick Companies LD operate at ,
1098 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection b]the
Urn8|in8sS of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute &348.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control
Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in
compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, Le it further resolved that this Resolution bv the City Council of
Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
8. Annual License Lawful Gambling - Merrick, Inc. (The Rock)
Adopted the follow resolution approving UleLavvfV|G8nnb|ingUC8nsefOrMHrhckCnn1p8nie8
to operate at The Rock at 2029 Woodlynn Avenue.
City Counc Meeting 02'8'06
RESOLUTION 06-02-021
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises
permit for lawful gambling is approved for Merrick Companies to operate at The Rock, 2029 Woodlyn
Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of
application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests
of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit applic�
Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this
Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Cor
9. St. Paul Monastery-Temporary Liquor L
Approved the temporary liquor permit for Carol Rennie
2675 Larpenteur Avenue.
10. Planning Commission's 2005 Annual Report
the Gambling Control Division
as being in compliance with
)n by the City Council of
ion for their approval.
of the St.Paul Monastery at
Accepted the Planning Commission's 2005 Annual Report.
11. Conditional Use Permit Review — Woodhill (Dahl Avenue, south of Linwood Avenue)
Moved to approve the CUP for Woodhill again on April 24, 2006 to ensure the developer has
paid the engineering escrow fees and has corrected the problems noted in the cease and desist
order.
Bruce Nedeqaard, the developer, Nedeqaard Custom Homes, addressed the council.
12. Conditional Use Permit Review — Maplewood Public Works Facility (1902 County Road B)
Approved to review the conditional use permit for the Maplewood Public Works building at 1902
County Road B East again in one year.
13. Conditional Use Permit Review — Heritage Square First Addition (Kennard Street and Legacy
Parkway)
Approved to review the CUP for Heritage Square again in one year.
14. County Road D Extension, West of Highway 61 — City Project 02-08 — Resolution for
Modification of Existing Construction Contract, Change Orders Nos. 2, 3 and 4
Adopted the following resolution directing the modification of the existing construction contract,
Change Order Nos. 2, 3 and 4 (T.A. Schifsky Contract) for the County Road D West
Improvements (TH 61 to Walter Street), City Project 02-08:
City Council Meeting 02-13-06 6
RESOLUTION 06-02-022
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PROJECT 02-08, CHANGE ORDER Nos. 2,3 and 4
(T.A. Schifsky Contract)
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement
Project 02-08, County Road D Realignment (West) Improvements (TH 61 to Walter Street), and has let a
construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported that it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be
modified and designated as Improvement Project 02-08, Change Order No. 2, 3 and 4, (T.A. Schifsky
Contract), as an increase to said contract by an amount of $42,11 such that the new contract amount is
now and hereby established as $724,323.93
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
that the mayor and city manager are hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the City of Maplewood to signify
and show that the existing contract is hereby modified through said Change Order No. 2, 3 and 4 as a contract
increase in the amount of $42,11 The revised contract amount is $724,323.93.
No revisions to the project budget are proposed at this time, as these changes fall within the
revised project budget approved by the city council on December 12, 2005.
15. Joint Powers Agreement with the State of Minnesota for Removal of Diseased Elm Trees on the
Gateway Trail
Approved the Minnesota Joint Powers Agreement (CFMS Contract No. A85324) so that the City
may be reimbursed by the State of Minnesota for the removal of diseased elm trees on the
Gateway Trail:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NT POWERS AGREEMENT
This agreement is between
Director of Trails and Watei
Under Minn. Stat. §§ 84.026 a
deemed necessary. The Stat(
city limits of Maplewood. The I
removal is required by statute.
not have staff availability to rei
I Term of Agreement
1.1 Effective date: Jam
Minnesota Statutes .�
1.2 Expiration da
occurs first.
nesota, acting through its Commissioner of Natural Resources, the
Recitals
471.59, ubd. 10, the State is empowered to engage such assistance as
in need of timely removal of diseased trees on the Gateway Trail within the
)Iic Works unit of the City of Maplewood has identified the diseased trees and
ie Department of Natural Resources, Division of Trails and Waterways does
ve the trees, so the City of Maplewood will remove the trees.
Agreement
23 2006,,or the date the State obtains all required signatures under
Dn 16C.05, subdivision 2, whichever is later.
31, 2006, or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever
2 Agreement between the Parties
The City of Maplewood will remove the trees identified and listed in "Exhibit A". The cost of removal is
estimated at 12,557.42. Due to unknown factors associated with tree removal, the cost may exceed the
estimate. If the cost is expected to exceed the estimate, the City of Maplewood must notify the DNR of the
reason and the amount of the additional cost. The maximum allowable additional costs shall not exceed
$1200.00
City Council Meeting 02-13-06
3 Payment
The total obligation ofthe State under this agreement will not exceed $14
4 Authorized Representatives
The State's Authorized Representative is [>8Oi8| K. B[8v8 Supervisor, Area 3B DNR Trails and \A/@t8nw@y3
651 772-7837 his/her successor.
The Governmental Unit's Authorized Representative is William Ph8fer Public Works Department, City of
yNap|evvond. MN, 651 24S-2408. The "Governmental Unit" is defined oS the City ofMaplewood.
5 Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Contract Complete
5.1 Assignment. The Governmental Unit may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under
this agreement without the prior consent of the State and a fully executed Assignment Agreement,
executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this agreement, or their
successors in office.
5.2 Amendments. Any amendment to this agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it
has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original
agreement, or their successors in office.
5.3 Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this agreement, that failure does not waive the
provision or its right to enforce it.
5.4 Contract Complete. This agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and
the Governmental Unit. No other understanding regarding this agreement, whether written or oral, may
be used to bind either party.
6 Liability
The Governmental Unit will indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from
any claims or causes of action, including attorney's fees incurred by the State, arising from the
performance of this agreement by the Governmental Unit or the Governmental Unit's agents or employees.
This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies the Governmental Unit may have for the State's
failure to fulfill its obligations under this agreement.
7 State Audits
Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the Governmental Unit's books, records, documents, and accounting
procedures and practices relevant to this agreement are subject to examination by the State and/or the
State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this
8 Government Data Practices
The Governmental Unit and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn.
S[8t. Ch. 13.8Sit applies LO all data provided bvthe State under this agreement, and 88it applies k}all
data created on||eoted, received atOred, uoed, maintained, or disseminated by the Governmental Unit
under this agreement. The civil remedies nfMinn. Si8L 8 13.08 apply tnthe release Vf the data referred to
in this clause by either the Governmental Unit or the State.
K the Governmental Unit receives 8 request tO release the data referred t0iO this Clause, the
Governmental Unit rnUGi immediately notify the State. The State will give the Governmental Unit
instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released.
9 Venue
Venue for all legal p[0CB8diOgS out 0fthis @gr88DleDt or its b[88Ch. must be in the 8ppnDph@t8 state or
federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota.
City Council Meeting 02'8'06
10 Termination
10.1 Termination. The State or the Governmental Unit may terminate this agreement at any time, with or
without cause, upon 30 days' written notice to the other party.
10.2 Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate this agreement if it
does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be
continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be
by written or fax notice to the Governmental Unit. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that
are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, the Governmental Unit will be entitled
to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds
are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the agreement is terminated because of the
decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must
provide the Governmental Unit notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State's
receiving that notice.
16. Purchase of Asphalt Pothole/Tack Trailer
Approved entering into a contract with Stepp Manufacturing Inc. for the purchase of
pothole/tack trailer unit at a cost of $21,976.28.
17. Change Order #3-Applewood Park
Approved Change Order #3 in the amount of $446 to eliminate erosion potential due to a
regrading of the hillside.
18. League of Women Voter's Candidate Forum
Approved the League of Women Voter's Candidate Non-Partisan Forum to be held in council
chambers February 15, 2006 at 7:00 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
J. AWARD OF BIDS
1 Maplewood Comr
a. City Manager
b. Chief Building
Councilmember F
improvement of tl
Center Operation
Seconded by COL
K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Pool Slide Access Stairs
ted the report.
ineer Farr presented specifics from the report.
moved to award the low bid of $29,950 be awarded for the
Imember Juenemann Ayes-All
Purchasing Policies and Procedures
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Finance Director Faust presented specifics from the report.
City Council Meeting 02-13-06
Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the addition of a policy statinci an individual who is in
the position to be makina sales of a product to the city may not be involved in the transaction of the
sale and establishing a procedure requiring two bids prior to a purchase.
2
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle
CoUnC|n1emb8rRos8b8Ch withdrew his motion.
Councilmember Hjelle moved to table this item and directed the City Attorney and staff to establish
a purchasina Policy addressina employment issues and defining what ownership interest means
with regard to that purchasing policy.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach
3. Charitable Gambling Policy
a. City Manager Fursman
b. City Attorney Ramberg
Mayor Longrie moved to ei
Disbursement Policy is in ci
Seconded by Cot
4. Public Works Bui
Contract
a. City Manager
b. City
presented the report and provided specifics.
�
answered council quest
Establish 8 Public Policy, by RHSn|Utk}n Calling for 8Written Policy for Fire Department Burns
8. City Manager FUnsnl8n presented the report.
b. [|hi8fLukin presented specifics from the report.
C. Fire Marshall Ge[v@i3 introduced Jean Lawry with the Boy Scouts Explorer's program who
spoke about the program and insurance coverage of participants.
Counci|nnennbnrLnnQho moved to direct City Manager Fursman to direct Chief Lukin to proce
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
n presented the report.
AN presented specifics from the report.
8n
, the project manager with Oertel Architects, was present for council questions.
e
Ayes-Al
Ayes-Al
to
— City Project 03 — Approve Changes to Construction
City Counc Meeting 02'8'06 10
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
5. Process for Personnel Policy Rev
a. City Manager Furanlan presented the report.
b. Human Resource Director L8 presented specifics from the repor
Councilmember Hjelle moved to direct the city to staff to adopt a policy that any changes in city
policy be distributed to all employees and subsequent employee handbooks issued to
employees includes all changes by addendum.
Seconded by Councilmember Bartol Ayes-All
NEW BUSINESS
1. Park Dedication Rates
8. City Manager FurSm8n presented the
b. Peter FiScher, Chair Ofthe Parks and Recreation Commission provide
cs of the
Seconded by Councilmember Bartol
2. Ramsey County Library Design
8. City Manager FurSm8n presented
b. Senior Planner Ek8tnandpr888nte
c. Boardmember Olson presented th
d. Jay Biedny, project manager with
e. Tim Carl, HGA Designs, the archil
Mayor Longrie moved to extend the rr
Motion died for lack of a second
Councilmember Juenemann moved t(
F-
1(3025Gnuth|
munity Design Review Board Report.
County, was present to answer council
project, addressed the council.
�
Seconded by Counci|memberRossbach Bartn| and Juenemann
and Rossbach
Motion Failed
City Manager FUnSnlan announced U3 visitors that this would b8 the last item addressed for
the evening. The meeting will reconvene 8t5:O0p.m.Dn Thursday, February 18"'
t The follow person was heard:
Richard McCain, 1825 Radatz, Maplewood
0- Boardmember Olson presented the Community Design Review Board report.
h. Susan N80itz, Director 0f the Ramsey County Library addressed the book drop-off and
other council question.
City Counc Meeting 02'8'06 l|
COuOC|m8[DbRrR0SSb8Ch
stamped December 12, 2065. Approval is subiect to the applicant complying with the following
1. Repeat this review in two years if the applicant has not applied for o building permit bv
that time.
2 Si Dag8isNot@pp0ved The applicant must submit a h8 ive sign plan for
review and approval by the community design review board. According to the approved
planned unit development requirements, ground signs shall be limited to 12 feet in height.
3. Comply with all requirements of Erin Laberee, the assistant city engineer, and those
listed in her report Engineering Plan Review dated February 10, 2006. This includes entering
into a developer's agreement with the city detailing the responsibility of the developer regarding
construction of public infrastructure such as the sidewalks and storm sewers.
4. The plan appears bJ. but the applicant shall 08k8 3UrR that it meets the requirements Of
the city's wetland protection ordinance.
5. All roof and ground-mounted mechanical equipment must be screened according to the
requirements of the planned unit development and city code.
0. As required by the planned unit development, the applicant must enter into a
development agreement with the city bJ dedicate @ trail along the south side Of the property.
The applicant shall be responsible for building this trail and the sidewalk along S0Uth|8vvD Drive
and any others deemed necessary bv the city engineer. The applicant must either obtain @trail
easement to build the southerly trail off of their site or they must relocate the trail onto their
In i
well as the sidewalk along Southlawn Drive. The city engineer should review and approve the
trail dedication documents as well as the plans for a sidewalk along the west side of Southlawn
Drive. Staff shall determine whether there is a trail easement on the abutting property to the
south to accommodate the proposed southerly trail. The council wants the trail to be located on
the abutting Birch Run Station property, if at all possible, in order to save additional trees.
7. Additional overstory trees shall be added along the Southlawn Drive frontage to meet a
maximum spacing of 30 to 40 feet as required by the planned unit development.
8. The amur maple trees shall be substituted with another similar ornamental tree.
Before a building permit is issued, the two lots com iSiOgthiSShBShGUb8COD1biDgd
legally-described parcel.
10. The applicant must get approval from the owner of Birch Run Station and the City of
Maplewood for use of the Birch Run Station rear driveway for access to the library delivery
doors. If the applicant cannot obtain these approvals, they must revise the site plan for staff
approval. This must be worked out before the issuance of a building permit.
11. The parking lot and driveway shall have concrete curb and gutter.
12. Parking stall drive-aisle dimensions and parking stall sizes shall comply with city code
13. All new turf areas must be equipped with 8O in-ground lawn irrigation system. The City
Council retains the right to require the installation of an in-ground irrigation as
determined by staff through future inspections of the landscaping.
City Council Meeting 02'8'06 12
14. The building placement and site grading must comply with the wetland ordinance and
cause no ground disturbance within 25 feet of the wetland delineation line. The building must
be at least 35 feet from the wetland delineation line at its closest point.
15. The director of community development may approve minor changes to these plans.
Major changes must be submitted to the design review board for approval.
16. The applicant must work with staff to determine the best and most functional location of
the main entrance driveway.
17. Zinc maybe used for the exterior instead of copper.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All
Mayor Longrie adjourned the meeting at 11:27 p.m.
The meeting reconvened at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 16, 2005.
9
Resolution of Support for Interconnect Project
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. City Engineer AN presented specifics from the report.
c. Dave Schuler, Chief Engineer for the project, presented further specifics of the report.
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following resolution supporting the interco
RESOLUTION 06-02-023
SUPPORT FOR WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has executed a Joint Powers Agreement with St.
)gional Water Services (SPRWS) to provide potable water to nearly 70% of the City's
WHEREAS, a project to provide an alternate supply of finished drinking water between
the Minneapolis Water and the Saint Paul Regional Water Services systems has been provided
for consideration by the Maplewood City Council, and
WHEREAS, Saint Paul Regional Water Services provides the citizens of Maplewood with safe,
reliable drinking water and has done so for many years, and
WHEREAS, SPRWS operates a well-designed, efficiently-operated and internally-redundant
system, and
WHEREAS, SPRWS is not totally protected from natural or manmade disasters, and the
likelihood of such an incident is extremely remote, but the effects of a long-term interruption
would be dramatic, and
WHEREAS there are 20 metropolitan cities that the Saint Paul and Minneapolis systems serve,
which is over 25% of the population in the State of Minnesota relying on these systems to
provide an uninterrupted supply of water for their everyday needs.
City Council Meeting 02-13-06 13
NOW, THEREFORE, |T|S HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Maplewood does hereby express our strong sup for the State of Minnesota Department of
Health's request for $10 million in State bonding.
Seconded bvCounC|nlen1b8rJu8nemann ,He|le.
Nays-Mayor LOnghe
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Wetland VV0rksh0p-[|nVnci|nn8nnberJUenHrn8nn announced that a Wetland Workshop will b8
held on February 23from 8:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Gladstone Station. An information flyer
is 8v8i|8b|8 on the cityvv8bSib3.
2
3
Rush Line Corridor Task F0rce-CoUn[i|nlernb8r
Line Corridor meeting.
Locate Task Force-Councilmember Rossbach was asked
Force and provided a report from the last meeting,
Reconsideration of the Maple Tree Conditional Use Permil
reconsideration of the Maplewood Tree CUP.
The City Attorney responded to Mayor Longrie's question
Public Hearings whenever a CUP is up for review or being
Councilmember Bartol withdrew his request to reconsider
presen
rt{n the last Rush
0
k"
�
be an alternate
um
irementareoording
UP for NY8p|e Tree.
^U
Mayor Longrie requested Mr. Brandt's attorney Tom Skovechski address the council.
The action that was taken serves to not change the conditions of the conditional use permit. The
CUP is for the twelve boys to be at the residence, but under the old conditions which has the
more restrictive language stating: the City Council shall review this permit in one year or
immediately if there are two criminal offenses related to the facility or to its residents.
Update Ramsey County Commission Meeting-Council member Hielle noted the comments from
the meeting were rendered not relevant to the city.
Petition Update-Mayor Longrie thanked Ms. Judith Johannessen for bringing forth her petition at
the previous council meeting. Mayor [onghe prov a summary oO discussions that have
occurred and an update on the resolution of the issues addressed by the petition. The petition
references the internal investigation initiated bv our City Manager, Mr. FVrsnn8n. to |nOk into two
incidences vvh8ne some individu8|S, off duty paid-per-call fire fighters and private citizens,
stuffed C@Dlp8igD literature into eDvG|0p8S at ODB Of the fire St8ti003 while watching 8 f00tb8||
game.
The resulting investigation addressed 3 areas Ofconcern:
Employee Policy regarding political activity by an emr)lovee. K was discussed, and the City
Manager, Mr. FVrsn18n. confirmed 8t our Council meeting on January 23 that hHtook
actions and has reprimanded 2 employees pursuant tothe employee policies in the employee
policy handbook in connection with the results Of the investigation. Since Maplewood iSGClass
B City, the City Manager is the person who makes, and is responsible for, the management of
the City employees, City employee reprimands and City employee matters ' not the Council.
City Counc Meeting 02'8'06 14
property City Council policy reciardinci the prohibition of campaigninci at City Hall or on municipal
The reference to Section 14 of the Rules of Procedure for City Council and Council
Meetings, as stated in the initial investigation, has been corrected in a subsequently amended
investigation report k}include only that policy that has been adopted by the City Council and not
8 proposed version. Ad our January 23 City Council meeting i[ was discussed and
confirmed by our City Attorney, Mr. Patrick P{e||y, that while there may be a City Council policy in
place, itiSnot enforceable because 8 policy iS not law. As8 result of this discussion, i{was
discovered that what Maplewood does not have an ordinance which governs the use of
municipal property for campaigning. AD enacted ordinance would bg law and would bR
eDfDrC8@b|8. If Maplewood had an ordinance regarding the use of municipal property for
campaigning or for political activity, it would be equally 8nfDrC88b|8 for all people in the
community, incumbents, ch8||enQers, private citizens, City employees. It would create constant
application and enforceability to all individuals.
Possible Statute 44 violations prohibiting political activity by civil service employees. At the
January 23 Council meeting our City Attorney, Mr. Patrick Kelly, stated that Statute
44 pertaining to civil service employees does not apply tO W18p|gvvO0d'3 paid-per-call firefighters
and that if Statute 44 does not apply tOK8@p|9vv0Od'Sp8y-pgFC8|| firefighters then there would
not orcould not be possible campaign violations under Statute 44@s outlined in the internal
investigation.
Additionally, Mayor bmgheapologized to Ms. JOhanDessenOn behalf of the City, the Council,
and the staff for fact that the original pHUUOnh8sbeennniGp|aD8d. She explained everyone has
looked high and low for the original petition and thanked Ms. Johannessen for bringing in a copy
of the OhgiD8| petition and placing it on file with the City Clerk. K8@yO[ LOngh8 stated "VVg
support and encourage individuals to submit petitions to the Council and we fully support each
and every person's First Amendment Right hJ petition their government. That iswhat
democracy i8 all @bouL.
Councilmember Rossbach read the following statement into the public record:
We have a situation in Maplewood that we need to resolve. It is my belief that the situation is
mostly political in nature; however, there is an underlying issue of violations of city policy and
state statutes regarding the election process. This situation needs to reach a conclusion. It has
already resulted in accusations in the media which try to place blame on others, and efforts to
confuse the issue. There have been accusations of efforts to block discussion of the issue at
our meetings and a parade of citizens, on both sides, making efforts to discredit council
members and cause embarrassment. This issue, I believe, is splitting this council, the city
employees and the citizens of Maplewood. We need to bring the issue to a conclusion. I
believe that our ability to work together as a council will be impaired and that the citizens will
work to support or discredit council members until we resolve this issue.
I have tried on two occasions to work with councilperson Hjelle to resolve it. I chose to talk to
him because he seemed to be the central figure in the issue. We could not come to an
agreement that was satisfactory to both of us. Since the council meeting on Monday night, I
have spent time considering what the obstacles are that prevent us from working together to
resolve the issue. My conclusion is obvious: we are not working together. As a matter of fact,
it is my belief that we are working hard against each other.
/have stated on two occasions be/ore that we must reach G conclusion, and that we cannot try
bJ judge ourselves. NAe also cannot have any member Of the city staff involved / the process. /
still believe this is true.
City Council Meeting 02'8'06 15
I believe that we are all reacting to this situation in the normal fashion. The normal response if
you feel that you are being attached is to defend yourself. We need to move beyond this
approach. As the leaders of the community, I believe that we must lead by example. To this
end, I will take the first step. I ask to be thoroughly investigated as to any actions I have taken
or statements I have made which may have been in violation of any city policies or state
statutes pertaining to elections. At this time I am aware of the following accusations against me:
One, I rode on a city fire truck in the White Bear Avenue Parade during a period of time after I
had filed for election as mayor. Two, I participated at a Maplewood Historical Society
Halloween Hoedown wearing a grape costume. Third,/ sent out a letter to approximatel y 100
people in late July or August asking people to consider Dale Trippler as a candidate for council
in the upcoming special election. If there are additional accusations, I ask that they be brought
forward to be investigated. /do not believe that I have violated any policies or laws with these
actions. However, lam not capable of judging myself. If 1have been in violation, then I want to
know and I want others to know so they can avoid these situations. I wish to issue a sincere
apology to any council persons, staff or citizens that I have hurt or criticized during this situation.
I will not seek to defend myself and will fully cooperate in any investigation. If I am found to be
guilty of any violation, I will not appeal or argue the issue. Instead, I will accept whatever
penalty is imposed.
I would ask that all members of this council and any new council person elected on February
28 tl ' to take this position.
7. President's Visit-Mayor Longrie discussed the President's visit and the honor it was to have him
visit the City of Maplewood. Mayor Longrie also thanked the Police and Fire Departments for
doing an outstanding job during the President's visit.
8. Class B City Update-Mayor Longrie addressed rumors that she has heard about employee job
security. She explained with a Class B city structure, the City Manager is the only one with the
authority to hire and fire city staff.
9. League of Women Vo
sponsoring the candid
special election on Fe
:orum-Mayor Longrie thanked the League of Women Voter's for
forum which is now in rebroadcast. The forum was held for the
10. Mayor's Forum-In Mayor Longrie's absence, Councilmember Juenemann will be presiding over
the March 4th Mayor's Forum.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
X
1. Candidates Forum-City Manager Fursman announced the Chamber of Commerce is sponsoring
a Candidates Forum at the Best Western in Maplewood on Friday, February 24, 2006, at 7:30
a. m.
2. Ballot Question-City Manager Fursman explained the liquor license question on the ballot for the
February 28, 2006 election.
19111= ► 1
Mayor Longrie adjourned the meeting at 6:27 p.m.
City Council Meeting 02-13-06
16
AGENDA NO. H -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: February 27, 2006
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills
and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTSPAYABLE:
$ 1,895.27 Manual Check 9 69208
dated 02/09/06
$ 130,590.92 Checks 9 69209 thru 4 69251
dated 2 /10 /06 thru 2/14/06
$ 132,392.61 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 02/03/06 thru 02/09/06
$ 163,534.14 Checks 9 69252 thru 9 69323
dated 02/21/06
$ 270,608.31 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 02/10/06 thru 02/15/06
$ 699,021.25 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$ 487,652.17 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 02 -10 -06
$ 2,284.75 Payroll Deduction check 9 104158 thru 9 104159
dated 02/10/06
$ 489,936.92 Total Payroll
$ 1,188,958.17 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651- 249 -2902 if you have any questions
on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary.
ds
attachments
S: \CTY_CLRK\Agenda Lists and Reports 2006\Agenda Reports \02- 27 -06 \H1 Approval of Claims.xis
vchlist
02/10/2006 9:26:26 AM
Check Register
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
69208
21912006
01809 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES NCR INC
STORM SWR RIP RAP
1,895.27
69209
211412006
02114 CARL BOLANDER & SONS CO.
AFTON HEIGHTS PARK REPAIR
43,383.12
69210
211412006
00283 CENTURY COLLEGE
FF APPLICATION FEE
20.00
FF 1 TRAINING
542.00
69211
2/1412006
00354 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS, INC.
ELECTRICAL REPAIR - PUMPER
171.43
69212
2/14/2006
03440 DELMEDICO MACHINE SHOP INC
REPAIR POLICE EQUIPMENT
40.00
69213
211412006
03599 DENNY HECKER'S FORD LINCOLN
INSPECT VEHICLE
62.52
69214
211412006
00358 DGM INC.
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
111.83
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
111.83
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
111.83
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
111.83
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
111.83
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
197.03
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
111.83
69215
2/1412006
03600 DISCOUNT STEEL INC
TUBING & FLOOR PLATE
1,270.10
69216
211412006
03463 EBERT CONSTRUCTION
APPLEWOOD PARK PYMT #6
4,649.93
69217
2/1412006
00463 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
REPAIRAMBULANCE
4,731.85
69218
211412006
01973 ERICKSON OIL PRODUCTS INC
CAR WASHES - JAN
148.00
69219
2/1412006
00003 ESCROW REFUND
REF MIKE SEERY- ESCR CVS
1,000.00
69220
2/14/2006
03601 FAMILY INST FOR CREATIVE
CHARITABLE GAMBLING AWARD
2,000.00
69221
2/14/2006
03343 GHIZONI PRODUCTIONS
ENTERTAINMENT - JULY 4TH
750.00
69222
2/14/2006
00638 HAYMAN, JANET GREW
REIMS FOR MILEAGE 1/21 -12/20
62.15
69223
2/14/2006
00660 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
FIRE DEPT TRAINING
655.00
69224
2/14/2006
00718 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #622
BASKETBALL LEAGUE GYM
197.90
GYM RENTAL
174.00
69225
2/10/2006
00749 JAHN, DAVID
REPLACEMENT PAYROLL CHK
1,032.09
69226
2/14/2006
01894 KELLY & FAWCETT PA
LEGAL SERVICES - JAN
18,692.77
69227
2/14/2006
00393 LABOR & INDUSTRY, DEPT OF
MONTHLY SURTAX - JAN
1,87932
69228
2/14/2006
00906 M P E L R A
MEMBERSHIP DUES
150.00
69229
2/14/2006
00908 M R P A
AGENCY MEMBERSHIPS
1,545.00
69230
2/14/2006
03602 MN CHAPTER OF MAPMO
MEMBERSHIP DUES
75.00
69231
2/14/2006
01060 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC
MEMBERSHIP DUES
305.00
69232
2/10/2006
03248 MUSIC MAGIC
DJ SERVICE FOR DANCE 2/10
325.00
69233
2/14/2006
01160 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
ALUMINUM SIGN BLANKS
1,693.89
69234
2/14/2006
02300 OAKDALE LOCKSMITHS
SWITCH KEYS
47.93
69235
2/14/2006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF PETER KUBESH - DOUBLE
200.00
69236
2/14/2006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF EMMA NORTON -
183.32
69237
2/14/2006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF JOHN LARRIVE - MEMBERSHIP
158.00
69238
2/14/2006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF WILLIAM SWARD -
119.81
69239
2/14/2006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF GLEN TSCHIDA-
66.00
69240
2/14/2006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF JODI ABBOTT - PROG
35.00
69241
2/14/2006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF C WEIGEL -PROG CANCELLED
35.00
69242
2/14/2006
01248 PARTY TIME LIQUOR
ROOTBEER 9/24
55.32
69243
2/14/2006
01941 PATRICK GRAPHICS & TROPHIES
BASKETBALL AWARDS
2,169.41
BASKETBALL AWARDS
1,197.86
69244
2/14/2006
00396 PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF
TRAINING REGISTRATION FEE
80.00
TRAINING REGISTRATION FEE
180.00
69245
2/14/2006
01340 REGIONS HOSPITAL
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
231.83
69246
2/14/2006
01504 ST PAUL, CITY OF
SHOWMOBILE FEE -4TH OF JULY
1,000.00
69247
2/14/2006
03288 UNIVERSITYAUTO SALES &SERV LLC
REF ESCROW - UNIV AUTO SALES
6,066.60
69248
2/14/2006
02165 URS CORPORATION
PROJ 03- 12PROF SRV THRU 2/11/05
8,972.15
69249
2/14/2006
01734 WALSH, WILLIAM P.
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSP
799.80
69250
2/14/2006
01754 WEBER & TROSETH INC.
RECHARGE FIRE EXTINGUISHER
12.00
69251
2/14/2006
01190 XCEL ENERGY
GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY
22,556.81
44 Checks
in this report
Total checks :
132,486.19
2
CITY OFMAPLBNOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee Description Amount
02/02/06
02/03/00
MIN State Treasurer
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar
13.428.20
01127K06
02/03106
VV| Dept ofRevenue
State Payroll Tax
1
01/31/00
02/03/06
ARC Administration
DCRP& Flex plan payments
2
02/02/06
02/03/00
K4N Dept nf Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
1.858.00
02/03/06
02/00/08
MN State Treasurer
Drivers Licenee/DeputyFlegiatnar
14.216.87
02/06/08
02/07/06
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar
17
02/07/06
02/08/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers Lioenoa/DaputyR*gintnar
15.085.14
02/03/06
02/08/00
US Bank VISA One Card*
Purchasing card items
54.848.07
02/08/06
02/09/00
MIN State Treasurer
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar
11.184.48
TOTAL
13239201
*Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached.
Transactions 01 -21 -06 to 02- 03 -06.
Trans Date
Pasting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
20060123
20060124
NAIL RECREATION AND PRK L
$486.00
BRUCE K ANDERSON
20060120
20060123
CUB FOODS, INC.
$12.10
MANDY ANZALDI
20060122
20060123
TARGET 00011858
$18.98
MANDY ANZALDI
20060126
20060130
CUB FOODS, INC.
$4.03
MANDY ANZALDI
20060130
20060201
ORIENTAL TRADING CO
$234.62
MANDY ANZALDI
20060131
20060201
TARGET 00011858
$15.96
MANDY ANZALDI
20060131
20060202
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$42.53
MANDY ANZALDI
20060120
20060123
SHRED -IT 01 OF 01
$119.88
JOHN BANICK
20060124
20060126
AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS -MN
$197.59
JOHN BANICK
20060124
20060126
STRETCHERS INC
$1,762.40
JOHN BANICK
20060202
20060203
JACK NADEL INC
$1,717.20
JOHN BANICK
20060119
20060123
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$72.70
JIM BEHAN
20060120
20060123
TRI -DIM FILTER CORP
$20.05
JIM BEHAN
20060120
20060123
TRI -DIM FILTER CORP
$122.04
JIM BEHAN
20060120
20060123
TRI -DIM FILTER CORP
$422.71
JIM BEHAN
20060121
20060123
UPS *0007NX6H8507
$10.38
JIM BEHAN
20060124
20060126
MCKAY DATA SYSTEMS INC
$132.50
JIM BEHAN
20060124
20060126
AQUA LOGIC INC
$794.98
JIM BEHAN
20060124
20060126
AQUA LOGIC INC
$82.77
JIM BEHAN
20060124
20060126
AQUA LOGIC INC
$39.34
JIM BEHAN
20060125
20060127
POOLSIDE
$1,721.33
JIM BEHAN
20060127
20060130
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$80.18
JIM BEHAN
20060130
20060201
MINVALCO INC
$265.97
JIM BEHAN
20060201
20060203
SIMPLEX GRINNELL WEB P
$1,429.40
JIM BEHAN
20060120
20060123
THREE RIVERS PARK
$115.00
OAKLEY BIESANZ
20060124
20060125
KNOWLANS #2
$11.95
OAKLEY BIESANZ
20060129
20060131
SEWARD COOP S4J
$26.53
OAKLEY BIESANZ
20060131
20060202
BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKL
$6.18
OAKLEY BIESANZ
20060130
20060201
A 1 VACUUM CLEANER AND
$97.21
ROGER BREHEIM
20060125
20060126
A & K EQUIPMENT COMPANY
$143.78
TROY BRINK
20060125
20060126
UNITED RENTALS
$54.99
TROY BRINK
20060130
20060131
UNITED RENTALS
($54.99)
TROY BRINK
20060120
20060123
YELLOW BOOK USA
$814.00
HEIDI CAREY
20060201
20060202
FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
$95.85
HEIDI CAREY
20060123
20060124
CUSTOM HEADSETS INC
$414.23
MELINDA COLEMAN
20060123
20060124
HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS
$650.00
LINDA CROSSON
20060124
20060125
GE CAPITAL
$158.69
LINDA CROSSON
20060125
20060127
TIME WARNER CABLE
$109.79
LINDA CROSSON
20060126
20060127
TERRYBERRY COMPANY
$919.74
ROBERTA DARST
20060128
20060130
COMCAST CABLE COMM
$111.30
ROBERTA DARST
20060131
20060201
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS #807
$286.49
THOMAS DEBILZAN
20060130
20060131
MENARDS 3059
$126.49
ROBERT J DOLLERSCHELL
20060131
20060202
OFFICE MAX 00002204
$8.51
ROBERT J DOLLERSCHELL
20060201
20060203
CUB FOODS, INC.
$14.03
ROBERT J DOLLERSCHELL
20060119
20060123
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$51.91
LARRY FARR
20060120
20060123
UNITED ELECTRIC #7649
$293.75
LARRY FARR
20060126
20060127
ELECTRIC MOTOR REAPIR
$136.15
LARRY FARR
20060127
20060130
WAL MART
$6.26
LARRY FARR
20060130
20060131
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1
$110.00
LARRY FARR
20060130
20060131
ADAMS PEST CONTROL
$321.74
LARRY FARR
20060130
20060131
ADAMS PEST CONTROL
$193.04
LARRY FARR
20060130
20060202
VIKING ELECTRIC -ST. PAUL
$120.27
LARRY FARR
20060131
20060201
CONTINENTAL RESEARCH
$517.58
LARRY FARR
20060131
20060202
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$13.79
LARRY FARR
20060120
20060123
TARGET 00011858
$60.43
GREG FINN
20060123
20060125
STREAMLINE DESIGN INC
$242.25
GREG FINN
11
Transactions 01 -21 -06 to 02- 03 -06.
Trans Date
Pasting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
20060127
20060130
BATTERIES PLUS
$61.72
DAVID FISHER
20060131
20060201
PAYPAL INC
$59.95
MYCHAL FOWLDS
20060118
20060126
ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
$977.67
NICK FRANZEN
20060119
20060123
WWW.CIRCUITCITY.COM
$340.76
NICK FRANZEN
20060120
20060123
WWW.CIRCUITCITY.COM
$127.77
NICK FRANZEN
20060120
20060126
ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
$480.00
NICK FRANZEN
20060124
20060126
CIRCUIT CITY SS #3137
$14.88
NICK FRANZEN
20060125
20060127
CIRCUIT CITY SS #3137
$19.16
NICK FRANZEN
20060128
20060130
HP DIRECT- PUBLICSECTOR
$326.96
NICK FRANZEN
20060202
20060203
HP DIRECT- PUBLICSECTOR
$2,674.99
NICK FRANZEN
20060131
20060202
BROCK WHITE -180
$417.30
RONALD FREBERG
20060129
20060131
SPRINT PCS #226
$612.33
RICHARD FURSMAN
20060127
20060130
WOLF CAMERA #1530
$28.90
CLARENCE GERVAIS
20060128
20060130
BATTERIES PLUS
$42.59
CLARENCE GERVAIS
20060125
20060126
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$98.98
JEAN GLASS
20060125
20060126
TECHNAGRAPHICS
$1,467.57
KAREN E GUILFOILE
20060126
20060127
PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC.
$50.00
KAREN E GUILFOILE
20060131
20060202
HEADSET INNOVATIONS
$325.85
KAREN E GUILFOILE
20060131
20060202
HEADSETS.COM INC
$787.85
KAREN E GUILFOILE
20060120
20060123
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$52.32
MARK HAAG
20060124
20060126
GARELICK STEEL CO. INC
$321.67
MARK HAAG
20060124
20060126
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$10.95
MARK HAAG
20060120
20060123
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$77.93
LORI HANSON
20060123
20060124
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$27.03
LORI HANSON
20060126
20060127
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$91.04
LORI HANSON
20060131
20060201
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$19.04
LORI HANSON
20060131
20060201
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$39.25
LORI HANSON
20060201
20060202
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
($42.60)
LORI HANSON
20060128
20060130
TARGET 00011858
$22.78
PATRICK HEFFERNAN
20060130
20060131
TARGET 00011858
$22.65
PATRICK HEFFERNAN
20060119
20060123
AMERICAN RED CROS01 OF 01
$28.00
RON HORWATH
20060120
20060123
OFFICE MAX 00002204
$5.31
RON HORWATH
20060131
20060202
RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY
$146.57
RON HORWATH
20060201
20060203
DE LAGS LANDEN OP01 OF 01
$206.61
ANN E HUTCHINSON
20060120
20060123
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
$76.00
KEVIN JOHNSON
20060120
20060123
SAMMY'S PIZZA DULUTH INC
$11.00
KEVIN JOHNSON
20060120
20060123
SUBWAY #10659
$5.95
KEVIN JOHNSON
20060121
20060123
HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI
$11.00
KEVIN JOHNSON
20060121
20060123
HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI
$5.62
KEVIN JOHNSON
20060122
20060124
HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI
$5.73
KEVIN JOHNSON
20060123
20060124
HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI
$277.98
KEVIN JOHNSON
20060120
20060123
WOLF CAMERA #1530
$9.36
TOM KALKA
20060201
20060203
HOLIDAY #523
$7.86
TOM KALKA
20060201
20060203
OFFICE MAX 00002204
$7.44
TOM KALKA
20060201
20060203
CUB FOODS, INC.
$34.05
TOM KALKA
20060201
20060203
GOODYEAR AUTO SRV CT 6920
$44.00
FLINT KARIS
20060127
20060130
MECA
$35.00
LOIS KNUTSON
20060125
20060127
CENTURY COMMUNITY TECHNIC
$1,404.21
DAVID KVAM
20060122
20060124
HYATT REGENCY PIER 66
$663.78
SHERYL L LE
20060121
20060123
OFFICE MAX 00005272
$6.38
MICHAEL LIDBERG
20060128
20060130
CUB FOODS #3123
$10.00
MICHAEL LIDBERG
20060120
20060123
MENARDS 3022
$144.90
DENNIS LINDORFF
20060120
20060123
SBC PAGING
$17.71
STEVE LUKIN
20060125
20060126
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
$949.85
STEVE LUKIN
20060125
20060126
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
$1,106.87
STEVE LUKIN
20060126
20060127
TARGET 00011858
$62.84
STEVE LUKIN
Transactions 01 -21 -06 to 02- 03 -06.
Trans Date
Pasting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
20060131
20060202
METRO SALES INC
$238.00
STEVE LUKIN
20060201
20060202
AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL INT
$962.64
STEVE LUKIN
20060201
20060202
METROCALL ARCH WIRE
$39.35
ED NADEAU
20060124
20060125
SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
$254.37
BRYAN NAGEL
20060125
20060126
CINTAS FIRST AID #431
$41.35
BRYAN NAGEL
20060127
20060130
RED WING SHOE STORE
$164.90
BRYAN NAGEL
20060130
20060131
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$231.94
AMY NIVEN
20060201
20060202
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$22.51
AMY NIVEN
20060201
20060202
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$14.30
AMY NIVEN
20060201
20060202
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$137.99
AMY NIVEN
20060120
20060123
QWEST *COMMUNICATION
$690.00
MARSHA
PACOLT
20060201
20060202
QWEST *COMMUNICATION
$690.00
MARSHA
PACOLT
20060126
20060127
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$67.89
KATHLEEN PECK HALL
20060126
20060127
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$60.36
KATHLEEN PECK HALL
20060131
20060201
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$69.21
KATHLEEN PECK HALL
20060124
20060126
EAT INC
$18.00
ROBERT
PETERSON
20060124
20060126
YOCUM OIL CO
$62.25
ROBERT
PETERSON
20060120
20060123
COMMUNICATIONS USA INC
$103.00
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060120
20060123
AGT BATTERY LLC
$397.10
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060121
20060123
ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES
$52.19
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060123
20060124
U.S. TACTICAL SUPPLY INC
$140.95
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060125
20060126
MEDCO SUPPLY
$51.00
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060125
20060126
FITZCO INC
$79.68
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060125
20060127
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$21.99
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060127
20060130
FSC, INC.
$43.55
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060129
20060201
ADORAMA INC
$143.20
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060131
20060202
KMART 00071068
$44.70
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060131
20060202
TOOLS & MORE
$72.30
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060201
20060202
BATTERIES PLUS
$18.40
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060201
20060203
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$7.47
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060201
20060203
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$41.27
PHILIP F
POWELL
20060120
20060123
TARGET 00011858
$94.56
ROBERT
PRECHTEL
20060121
20060123
BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
$118.11
ROBERT
PRECHTEL
20060125
20060126
DAVANNI'S #18 - WOODBU
$84.97
ROBERT
PRECHTEL
20060125
20060127
CUB FOODS #3123
$13.18
ROBERT
PRECHTEL
20060127
20060130
BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
$149.34
ROBERT
PRECHTEL
20060201
20060202
GE CAPITAL
$331.22
WILLIAM
J PRIEFER
20060202
20060203
SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
$515.05
WILLIAM
J PRIEFER
20060119
20060123
WHITE BEAR DODGE INC
$81.54
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060120
20060123
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
$50.92
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060120
20060123
GOODYEAR AUTO SRV CT 6920
$54.00
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060120
20060123
SOI *SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL
$58.00
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060120
20060123
TRI STATE BOBCAT
$179.13
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060123
20060124
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES
$134.22
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060123
20060125
BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
$78.40
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060124
20060125
POLAR CHEVROLET
$9.86
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060124
20060125
POLAR CHEVROLET
$24.42
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060124
20060127
AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPL
$119.54
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060125
20060126
TERMINAL SUPPLY, INC.
$84.54
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060125
20060127
BAUER BOLT TRE33200023
$287.55
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060126
20060127
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
$45.80
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060126
20060130
TOUSLEY FORD 127200039
$78.83
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060127
20060130
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
$1,562.48
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060127
20060130
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
$1,349.39
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060127
20060130
HOTSY EQUIPMENT OF MINNES
$94.56
STEVEN
PRIEM
20060130
20060131
L Z TRUCK EQUIPMENT
$149.00
STEVEN
PRIEM
Transactions 01 -21 -06 to 02- 03 -06.
Trans Date
Pasting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
20060130
20060131
SOI *SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL
$103.21
STEVEN PRIEM
20060130
20060131
PAM OIL INC
$217.47
STEVEN PRIEM
20060130
20060201
BAUER BOLT TRE33200023
$44.50
STEVEN PRIEM
20060131
20060201
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO.
$1,336.02
STEVEN PRIEM
20060131
20060202
TOUSLEY FORD 127200039
$275.76
STEVEN PRIEM
20060131
20060202
TOUSLEY FORD 127200039
$40.43
STEVEN PRIEM
20060131
20060202
FELLING TRAILERS INC
$158.11
STEVEN PRIEM
20060201
20060202
MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC. -PL
$732.58
STEVEN PRIEM
20060201
20060203
BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
$25.62
STEVEN PRIEM
20060201
20060203
BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
$3.90
STEVEN PRIEM
20060202
20060203
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
$68.10
STEVEN PRIEM
20060202
20060203
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
$36.16
STEVEN PRIEM
20060202
20060203
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
$59.61
STEVEN PRIEM
20060202
20060203
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
$3.09
STEVEN PRIEM
20060126
20060127
HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS
$1,179.86
MICHAEL REILLY
20060131
20060203
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
$848.02
MICHAEL REILLY
20060124
20060125
TARGET 00011858
$150.86
AUDRA ROBBINS
20060120
20060123
WW GRAINGER 500
$272.21
ROBERT RUNNING
20060120
20060126
ABLE HOSE & RUBBER, INC
$161.84
ROBERT RUNNING
20060124
20060125
A & K EQUIPMENT COMPANY
$570.84
ROBERT RUNNING
20060125
20060127
DISCOUNT STEEL INC
$935.71
ROBERT RUNNING
20060127
20060130
MENARDS 3059
$416.16
ROBERT RUNNING
20060130
20060131
UNITED RENTALS
$45.48
ROBERT RUNNING
20060130
20060131
UNITED RENTALS
$42.59
ROBERT RUNNING
20060130
20060201
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$49.59
ROBERT RUNNING
20060124
20060125
MENARDS 3022
$21.09
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
20060124
20060125
MENARDS 3059
$9.56
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
20060126
20060127
MENARDS 3059
$4.87
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
20060127
20060130
ROCKLER WOODWORK 013
$5.31
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
20060127
20060130
MENARDS 3022
$15.11
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
20060127
20060130
MILLS FLEET FARM #27
$14.69
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
20060120
20060123
SHRED -IT 01 OF 01
$17.65
DEB SCHMIDT
20060201
20060202
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$48.99
DEB SCHMIDT
20060126
20060127
CLOVER SUPER FOODS
$138.79
RUSSELL L SCHMIDT
20060201
20060202
T- MOBILE
$46.36
SCOTT SCHULTZ
20060124
20060126
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
$190.79
MICHAEL SHORTREED
20060126
20060130
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
$65.00
MICHAEL SHORTREED
20060131
20060202
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
$567.12
MICHAEL SHORTREED
20060124
20060125
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$25.88
ANDREA SINDT
20060201
20060202
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$18.74
ANDREA SINDT
20060122
20060123
TARGET 00006940
$73.91
PAULINE STAPLES
20060130
20060131
SUBWAY #400
$4.89
SCOTT STEFFEN
20060131
20060201
SUBWAY #400
$7.01
SCOTT STEFFEN
20060201
20060202
SUBWAY #400
$6.04
SCOTT STEFFEN
20060120
20060123
KIN *VOLUNTEER FIRE
$50.00
RUSTIN SVENDSEN
20060128
20060130
LABSAFE*
$241.63
RUSTIN SVENDSEN
20060201
20060203
ASPEN MILLS 8005717343
$99.79
RUSTIN SVENDSEN
20060201
20060203
ASPEN MILLS 8005717343
$207.83
RUSTIN SVENDSEN
20060119
20060123
OFFICE MAX 00002204
$42.04
LYLE SWANSON
20060120
20060123
MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER
$200.15
LYLE SWANSON
20060120
20060123
HIRSHFIELD'S MAPLEWOOD
$19.48
LYLE SWANSON
20060124
20060125
ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC
$580.00
LYLE SWANSON
20060201
20060202
T- MOBILE
$105.70
DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN
20060121
20060123
QWESTCOMM *TN612
$70.29
JUDY TETZLAFF
20060121
20060123
QWESTCOMM *TN612
$140.58
JUDY TETZLAFF
20060121
20060123
QWESTCOMM *TN612
$70.29
JUDY TETZLAFF
Transactions 01 -21 -06 to 02- 03 -06.
Trans Date
Pasting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
20060121
20060123
QWESTCOMM *TN612
$99.68
JUDY TETZLAFF
20060121
20060123
QWESTCOMM *TN612
$99.68
JUDY TETZLAFF
20060121
20060123
QWESTCOMM *TN612
$856.51
JUDY TETZLAFF
20060121
20060123
QWESTCOMM *TN612
$372.92
JUDY TETZLAFF
20060121
20060123
QWESTCOMM *TN612
$99.68
JUDY TETZLAFF
20060121
20060123
QWESTCOMM *TN612
$99.68
JUDY TETZLAFF
20060121
20060123
QWESTCOMM *TN612
$70.29
JUDY TETZLAFF
20060123
20060124
QWESTCOMM *TN651
$57.65
JUDY TETZLAFF
20060124
20060126
TRUCK UTILITES INC
$123.41
TODD TEVLIN
20060125
20060127
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$41.76
TODD TEVLIN
20060201
20060202
NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT
$79.86
TODD TEVLIN
20060127
20060130
AE SIGN SYSTEMS
$64.54
SUSAN ZWIEG
20060127
20060131
QUILL CORPORATION
$340.75
SUSAN ZWIEG
$54,848.07
Vchlist
02/17/2006 10:59:36 AM
Check Register
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
69252
2/2112006
02347 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER
TRAINING REGISTRATION
175.00
69253
2/21/2006
01809 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES NCR INC
SAFETY GRIT - TAX & DELIVERY
3,343.46
69254
2/21/2006
00111 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC
PATROL & BOARDING FEES 1130 -
1,737.63
69255
2/21/2006
02034 ASSN FOR NONSMOKERS
NORTH SUBURB TOBACCO COMP
1,934.50
69256
2/21/2006
01811 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC
MERCH FOR RESALE
126.00
69257
2/21/2006
01869 BOETCHER, DALE
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
176.00
69258
2/2112006
01865 BOWMAN, DON
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL &
598.00
69259
2/21/2006
00206 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
FUEL TANK
606.47
69260
2/2112006
00211 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP.
PROJ 03 -19 PW BLDG ADDITION
298.00
69261
2/21/2006
00218 BROADWAY BUILDERS
REF GRADING ESC - 503 DORLAND
2,00126
69262
2/21/2006
00494 CHILDREN HOME & FAMILY SERVICE
YOUTH DIVERSION PROGRAM -
3,526.08
69263
2/21/2006
02050 CRITICAL CONNECTION ECOLOGICAL
BUCKTHORN REMOVAL
566.43
69264
2/21/2006
00363 DLT SOLUTIONS, INC.
AUTOCAD SOFTWARE
2,168.00
69265
2/21/2006
03035 DOLLERSCHELL, BOB
REIMB FOR SEMINAR FEE 2/11
15.00
69266
2/2112006
00451 ELAN -MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONTR
REPAIR GARAGE BAY HEATER
148.00
69267
2/21/2006
03576 EUREKA RECYCLING
RECYCLING - FEB
16,913.42
69268
2/2112006
00487 F.M. FRATTALONE EXC INC
PROJ 02 -07 COUNTY RD D PYMT
12,296.65
69269
2/21/2006
00499 FAUST, DANIEL
REIMB FOR MEAL - 1/27
5.50
69270
2/21/2006
00509 FIRE MARSHAL ASSN OF MN
MEMBERSHIP
35.00
69271
2/21/2006
00509 FIRE MARSHAL ASSN OF MN
MEMBERSHIP
35.00
69272
2/21/2006
00520 FLOR, TIMOTHY W
REIMB FOR TUITION
210.00
69273
2/21/2006
01867 HANSON, PERRY
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
396.00
69274
2/2112006
02945 HEALTHEAST VEHICLE SERVICES
INSTALL PREEMPTION SYSTEM
148.15
69275
2/21/2006
03155 HIBBERD, JOSEPH H
FOOD INSPECTIONS &
2,433.75
69276
2/2112006
03330 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC
PROJ 04 -21 GLADSTONE REDEV
4,283.48
69277
2/21/2006
03538 HUBBARD, PATRICK JAMES
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
792.00
69278
2/21/2006
00721 INDEPENDENT SPORTS NETWORK
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL SERVICE
1,368.00
69279
2/21/2006
00489 INTEREUM INC
OFFICE PANEL & WORK SURFACE
1,806.24
69280
2/21/2006
02787 KALKA, THOMAS M
REIMB FOR REFRESHMENTS 2 -1
49.06
69281
2/21/2006
00789 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE CO
UNLEADED MID -GRADE {89
13,002.28
69282
2/2112006
01894 KELLY & FAWCETT PA
PROSECUTION SERVICES - JAN
9,825.00
69283
2/21/2006
03021 KIMLINGER, JENNIFER
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
396.00
69284
2/2112006
03607 KIMLINGER, ROB
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
264.00
69285
2/21/2006
00908 M R P A
STATE TOURNAMENT FEES
650.00
69286
2/21/2006
00910 M S S A
MEMBERSHIP
35.00
69287
2/21/2006
03332 MC CARTY, GLEN
REIMB FOR MEALS & BOOK 1/12 -
45.86
REIMB FOR MEALS 10 -26 - 12 -28
26.61
69288
2/21/2006
02651 MCI
MCI NETWORK PHONE CHARGE
5.54
69289
2/2112006
03023 MELANDER, JON
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
330.00
69290
2/21/2006
00977 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
SOFTBALLS
2,067.48
69291
2/21/2006
00986 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
MONTHLY SAC - JAN
9,207.00
69292
2/21/2006
01058 MN SHREDDING LLC
SHREDDING SERVICE
170.83
69293
2/21/2006
03022 MOTT, RANDALL
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
330.00
69294
2/21/2006
01124 NATL ASSN OF TOWN WATCH - NATW
MEMBERSHIP
25.00
69295
2/2112006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF ST PAUL SHEET METAL- FOOD
610.00
69296
2/21/2006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF M STELLMACH - MEMBERSHIP
56.58
69297
2/2112006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF DEBBIE COOK - PROG
35.00
69298
2/21/2006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF KATHY WESTBERG - TICKETS
17.04
69299
2/21/2006
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF SARA KOPPE - MEMBERSHIP
10.00
69300
2/21/2006
02043 OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY
REPAIR PW GARAGE DOOR
5,254.82
69301
2/21/2006
01863 PACKER, ROGER
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
880.00
9
Vchlist
02/17/2006 10:59:36 AM
Check Register
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
69302
2/21/2006
02270 PALDA & SONS INC
PROJ 02 -08 COUNTY RD D PYMT #6
6,155.38
69303
2/21/2006
03608 PETERSON, MARK
REIMB FOR BATTERY
50.99
69304
2/21/2006
01284 POSTMASTER
BRM PERMIT RENEWAL #625000
160.00
69305
2/21/2006
01359 REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL XX
CAR WASHES - JAN
65.91
69306
2/21/2006
03446 RICK JOHNSON DEER & BEAVER INC
DEER PICKUP - JAN
100.00
69307
2/21/2006
03533 ROESER, RICHARD MICHAEL
REF GRADING ESC - 457 O'DAY CIR
500.00
69308
2/21/2006
02663 SAARION, CARL
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
44.00
69309
2/21/2006
03215 SHAFER CONTRACTING CO INC
PROJ 02 -07 CTY RD D PYMT #11
21,934.37
69310
2/21/2006
03398 SHAMROCK GROUP
MERCH FOR RESALE
271.00
69311
2/21/2006
03557 SIKORA, PAUL
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
66.00
69312
2/21/2006
03609 SILHOUETTE IMAGING CORP
TONER CARTRIDGES
83.07
69313
2/21/2006
01504 ST PAUL, CITY OF
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
1,176.63
RADIO SERVICE & MAINT - JAN
16.65
69314
2/21/2006
01059 STATE OF MN
DOT INSPECTION DECALS
48.00
69315
2/21/2006
01915 STEFFEN, NANCY
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
198.00
69316
2/21/2006
01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
REF GRADING ESCROW - 1762
500.00
69317
2/21/2006
01695 UNITED RENTALS, INC.
PARKAS
919.11
69318
2/21/2006
03606 URBAN COMPANIES
AFTON PARK REPAIR WORK
500.00
69319
2/21/2006
01734 WALSH, WILLIAM P.
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSP
116.88
69320
2/21/2006
01750 WATSON CO INC, THE
MERCH FOR RESALE
432.06
69321
2/21/2006
01755 WEBER ELECTRIC
REPLACE GFI INLINE & AMP
311.42
69322
2/21/2006
01872 WEBER, MARK
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL
330.00
69323
2/21/2006
01190 XCEL ENERGY
GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY
532.15
ELECTRIC UTILITY
56.25
GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY
10,035.26
ELECTRIC UTILITY
1,221.51
ELECTRIC UTILITY
12,209.53
GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY
4,061.85
72 Checks in this report
Total checks:
163,534.14
10
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee Description Amount
02/09/06
02/10/06
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
11,735.83
02/10/06
02/10/06
ICMA (Vantagepointe)
Deferred Compensation
7,942.92
02/09/06
02/10/06
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
1,126.00
02/10/06
02/13/06
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
10,792.06
02/10/06
02/13/06
U.S. Treasurer
Federal Payroll Tax
99,034.87
02/10/06
02/13/06
P.E.R.A.
P.E.R.A.
63,341.93
02/10/06
02/13/06
Orchard Trust
Deferred Compensation
28,802.66
02/13/06
02/14/06
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
12,949.00
02/10/06
02/14/06
MN State Treasurer
State Payroll Tax
19,046.49
02/10/06
02/14/06
MidAmerica - ING
HRA Flex plan
3,011.71
02/10/06
02/14/06
Labor Unions
Union Dues
1,719.88
02/10/06
02/14/06
Federal Reserve Bank
Savings Bonds
100.00
02/14/06
02/15/06
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
11,004.96
TOTAL
i'.i71> - I - *�
III
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
12
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
02 /10 /06
HJELLE, ERIK
397.80
dd
02/10/06
JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN
397.80
dd
02/10/06
ROSSBACH, WILLIAM
397.80
dd
02/10/06
COLEMAN, MELINDA
4,393.88
dd
02/10/06
DARST, ROBERTA
1,863.89
dd
02/10/06
FURSMAN, RICHARD
5,205.58
dd
02/10/06
FARR, LARRY
1,821.04
dd
02/10/06
SWANSON, LYLE
1,711.57
dd
02/10/06
LE, JENNIFER
310.50
dd
02/10/06
LE, SHERYL
4,246.65
dd
02/10/06
RAMEAUX, THERESE
2,448.11
dd
02/10/06
FAUST, DANIEL
4,417.22
dd
02/10/06
SCHMIDT, DEBORAH
1,57096
dd
02/10/06
ANDERSON, CAROLE
2,446.24
dd
02/10/06
BAUMAN, GAYLE
3,537.43
dd
02/10/06
JACKSON, MARY
1,873.35
dd
02/10/06
KELSEY, CONNIE
2,580.21
dd
02/10/06
TETZLAFF, JUDY
1,873.35
dd
02/10/06
FRY, PATRICIA
1,738.95
dd
02/10/06
GUILFOILE, KAREN
3,094.70
dd
02/10/06
MORSON, JOHN
510.72
dd
02/10/06
SPANGLER, EDNA
817.71
dd
02/10/06
JAGOE, CAROL
1,679.66
dd
02/10/06
JOHNSON, BONNIE
1,148.90
dd
02/10/06
MECHELKE, SHERRIE
1,705.84
dd
02/10/06
MOY, PAMELA
970.94
dd
02/10/06
OLSON, SANDRA
2,188.45
dd
02/10/06
OSTER, ANDREA
1,764.46
dd
02/10/06
WEAVER, KRISTINE
1,839.76
dd
02/10/06
BANICK, JOHN
3,987.34
dd
02/10/06
CORCORAN, THERESA
1,701.36
dd
02/10/06
POWELL, PHILIP
2,336.04
dd
02/10/06
RICHIE, CAROLE
1,716.28
dd
02/10/06
THOMALLA, DAVID
4,429.00
dd
02/10/06
ABEL, CLINT
2,863.63
dd
02/10/06
ALDRIDGE, MARK
2,783.32
dd
02/10/06
ANDREWS, SCOTT
3,578.95
dd
02/10/06
BAKKE, LONN
3,078.52
dd
02/10/06
BELDE, STANLEY
2,445.82
dd
02/10/06
BIERDEMAN, BRIAN
2,445.83
dd
02/10/06
BOHL, JOHN
3,214.53
12
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
13
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
02/10106
BUSACK, DANIEL
1,800.11
dd
02/10106
COFFEY, KEVIN
2,352.98
dd
02/10106
GROTTY, KERRY
3,233.21
dd
02/10106
DOBLAR, RICHARD
3,45833
dd
02/10106
DUNN, ALICE
2,580.82
dd
02/10106
GABRIEL, ANTHONY
1,988.74
dd
02/10106
HEINZ, STEPHEN
2,560.59
dd
02/10106
HIEBERT, STEVEN
3,229.57
dd
02/10106
JOHNSON, KEVIN
3,691.84
dd
02/10106
KALKA, THOMAS
1,225.41
dd
02/10106
KARIS, FLINT
3,773.63
dd
02/10106
KONG, TOMMY
2,521.51
dd
02/10106
KROLL, BRETT
2,944.57
dd
02/10106
KVAM, DAVID
3,523.42
dd
02/10106
LANGNER, TODD
1,680.93
dd
02/10106
LU, JOHNNIE
3,172.65
dd
02/10106
MARINO, JASON
2,687.05
dd
02/10106
MARTIN, JERROLD
2,51438
dd
02/10106
MCCARTY, GLEN
2,652.96
dd
02/10106
METRY, ALESIA
2,524.40
dd
02/10106
NYE, MICHAEL
1,968.73
dd
02/10106
OLSON, JULIE
2,742.23
dd
02/10106
RABBETT, KEVIN
3,587.70
dd
02/10106
RHUDE, MATTHEW
1,653.43
dd
02/10106
STEFFEN, SCOTT
3,340.98
dd
02/10106
STEINER, JOSEPH
1,655.91
dd
02/10106
SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM
1,685.93
dd
02/10106
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS
2,60730
dd
02/10106
WENZEL, JAY
2,709.13
dd
02/10106
XIONG, KAO
2,433.22
dd
02/10106
BARTZ, PAUL
2,913.57
dd
02/10106
BERGERON, JOSEPH
3,38139
dd
02/10106
DUGAS, MICHAEL
2,577.07
dd
02/10106
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA
2,713.80
dd
02/10106
FLOR, TIMOTHY
4,113.69
dd
02/10106
FRASER, JOHN
2,945.66
dd
02/10106
LANGNER, SCOTT
2,217.28
dd
02/10106
PALMA, STEVEN
3,401.17
dd
02/10106
THEISEN, PAUL
2,217.28
dd
02/10106
THIENES, PAUL
2,628.65
dd
02/10106
CARLSON, BRIAN
1,864.53
13
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
1111
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
02/10106
DAWSON, RICHARD
2,272.98
dd
02/10106
DUELLMAN, KIRK
2,166.89
dd
02/10106
EVERSON, PAUL
2,709.28
dd
02/10106
HALWEG, JODI
1,869.77
dd
02/10106
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
2,394.87
dd
02/10106
MYERS, TODD
1,864.53
dd
02/10106
NOVAK, JEROME
2,279.40
dd
02/10106
PARSONS, KURT
2,143.18
dd
02/10106
PETERSON, ROBERT
2,38432
dd
02/10106
PRECHTEL, ROBERT
2,211.08
dd
02/10106
SVENDSEN, RONALD
2,721.20
dd
02/10106
GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE
2,86834
dd
02/10106
BAUER, MICHELLE
2,46338
dd
02/10106
FLAUGHER, JAYME
1,993.53
dd
02/10106
HERMANSON, CHAD
1,603.75
dd
02/10106
HUBIN, KENNARD
1,825.13
dd
02/10106
KNAPP, BRETT
1,61836
dd
02/10106
LINN, BRYAN
1,969.83
dd
02/10106
PACOLT, MARSHA
2,529.68
dd
02/10106
RABINE, JANET
2,505.11
dd
02/10106
SCHAULS, ADAM
273.00
dd
02/10106
STAHNKE, JULIE
2,146.49
dd
02/10106
LUKIN, STEVEN
4,016.18
dd
02/10106
SVENDSEN, RUSTIN
3,21937
dd
02/10106
ZWIEG, SUSAN
2,028.76
dd
02/10106
DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT
29339
dd
02/10106
AHL, R. CHARLES
4,675.69
dd
02/10106
BREHEIM, ROGER
1,897.97
dd
02/10106
GROHS, JUDITH
1,820.28
dd
02/10106
KONEWKO, DUWAYNE
3,059.51
dd
02/10106
NIVEN, AMY
1,254.40
dd
02/10106
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
2,601.27
dd
02/10106
BRINK, TROY
1,871.14
dd
02/10106
BRUNELL, DAVID
1,573.08
dd
02/10106
DEBILZAN, THOMAS
2,005.27
dd
02/10106
EDGE, DOUGLAS
2,005.27
dd
02/10106
JONES, DONALD
2,049.27
dd
02/10106
MEYER, GERALD
1,981.79
dd
02/10106
NAGEL, BRYAN
2,368.18
dd
02/10106
OSWALD, ERICK
2,080.46
dd
02/10106
RUNNING, ROBERT
1,807.75
1111
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
im
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
02/10106
TEVLIN, TODD
2,079.97
dd
02/10106
DUCHARME, JOHN
2,414.88
dd
02/10106
ENGSTROM, ANDREW
1,694.15
dd
02/10106
ISAKSON, CHAD
103.95
dd
02/10106
JACOBSON, SCOTT
2,010.76
dd
02/10106
JAROSCH, JONATHAN
2,030.15
dd
02/10106
KNUTSON, LOIS
1,50590
dd
02/10106
KUMMER, STEVEN
2,366.82
dd
02/10106
LABEREE, ERIN
2,88235
dd
02/10106
LINDBLOM, RANDAL
2,703.27
dd
02/10106
PECK, DENNIS
2,421.79
dd
02/10106
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
2,417.17
dd
02/10106
THOMPSON, MICHAEL
2,337.67
dd
02/10106
ANDERSON, BRUCE
4,359.27
dd
02/10106
CAREY, HEIDI
2,138.16
dd
02/10106
HALL, KATHLEEN
1,820.28
dd
02/10106
MARUSKA, MARK
2,754.63
dd
02/10106
NAUGHTON, JOHN
1,770.15
dd
02/10106
SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
1,895.66
dd
02/10106
BIESANZ, OAKLEY
1,658.82
dd
02/10106
HAYMAN, JANET
1,470.05
dd
02/10106
HUTCHINSON, ANN
2,330.27
dd
02/10106
NELSON, JEAN
1,079.86
dd
02/10106
GAYNOR, VIRGINIA
2,060.55
dd
02/10106
EKSTRAND, THOMAS
3,134.50
dd
02/10106
KROLL, LISA
1,289.87
dd
02/10106
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE
1,130.50
dd
02/10106
SINDT, ANDREA
1,695.75
dd
02/10106
THOMPSON, DEBRA
755.22
dd
02/10106
YOUNG, TAMELA
1,567.75
dd
02/10106
CHRISTIANSEN, KEVIN
480.00
dd
02/10106
FINWALL, SHANN
2,274.41
dd
02/10106
ROBERTS, KENNETH
2,486.07
dd
02/10106
CARVER, NICHOLAS
2,853.51
dd
02/10106
FISHER, DAVID
3,374.28
dd
02/10106
RICE, MICHAEL
2,012.55
dd
02/10106
SWAN, DAVID
2,110.95
dd
02/10106
SWETT, PAUL
1,544.55
dd
02/10106
BJORK, ALICIA
39432
dd
02/10106
EVANS, BRIAN
98.00
dd
02/10106
FINN, GREGORY
2,280.01
im
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
02/10106
FRANK, PETER
290.00
dd
02/10106
GALLANT, CHARLENE
212.50
dd
02/10106
GOODRICH, CHAD
119.00
dd
02/10106
KELLY, LISA
1,415.27
dd
02/10106
MCBRIDE, PATRICK
80.00
dd
02/10106
NIEMAN, JAMES
102.00
dd
02/10106
NIEMCZYK, BRIAN
160.00
dd
02/10106
NIEMCZYK, EMILY
68.00
dd
02/10106
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
469.13
dd
02/10106
ROBBINS, AUDRA
2,179.48
dd
02/10106
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
185.25
dd
02/10106
STAPLES, PAULINE
3,028.20
dd
02/10106
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS
2,85434
dd
02/10106
UNDERHILL, KRISTEN
224.00
dd
02/10106
GERMAIN, DAVID
1,902.59
dd
02/10106
NORDQUIST, RICHARD
1,939.53
dd
02/10106
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
2,193.60
dd
02/10106
ANZALDI, MANDY
1,93439
dd
02/10106
COLEMAN, PHILIP
395.00
dd
02/10106
COLLINS, ASHLEY
128.00
dd
02/10106
CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND
224.00
dd
02/10106
CROSSON, LINDA
2,688.71
dd
02/10106
DREWES, DEENA
177.60
dd
02/10106
EVANS, CHRISTINE
810.08
dd
02/10106
GRAF, MICHAEL
2,001.16
dd
02/10106
HOFMEISTER, MARY
640.52
dd
02/10106
LEIBEL, LEAH
129.50
dd
02/10106
PELOQUIN, PENNYE
581.88
dd
02/10106
SCHMIDT, RUSSELL
2,094.61
dd
02/10106
SCHULZE, BRIAN
1,14038
dd
02/10106
ZIELINSKI, JUDY
103.60
dd
02/10106
ANDREA, JOHANNA
24.50
dd
02/10106
BRENEMAN, NEIL
71736
dd
02/10106
BRUSOE, CRISTINA
126.50
dd
02/10106
BUCKLEY, BRITTANY
142.50
dd
02/10106
CANTLON, COLLEEN
23.25
dd
02/10106
DUNN, RYAN
1,531.02
dd
02/10106
ERICKSON- CLARK, CAROL
108.75
dd
02/10106
EVANS, KRISTIN
126.00
dd
02/10106
FONTAINE, KIM
97037
dd
02/10106
GREDVIG, ANDERS
40938
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
I
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
02/10106
HAWBAKER, EVAN
77.55
dd
02/10106
HORWATH, RONALD
2,159.70
dd
02/10106
KOEHNEN, AMY
125.25
dd
02/10106
KOEHNEN, MARY
2,099.74
dd
02/10106
KRONHOLM, KATHRYN
622.67
dd
02/10106
MATHEWS, LEAH
150.50
dd
02/10106
NELSON, SIERRA
72.98
dd
02/10106
OVERBY, ANNA
120.00
dd
02/10106
PROESCH, ANDY
274.19
dd
02/10106
SIMPSON, KIMBERLYN
20.85
dd
02/10106
SKALD, SHANNON
72.00
dd
02/10106
SMITH, ANN
206.25
dd
02/10106
TRUE, CAROLINE
19.80
dd
02/10106
TUPY, HEIDE
212.60
dd
02/10106
TUPY, MARCUS
294.00
dd
02/10106
WERNER, REBECCA
141.63
dd
02/10106
WHITE, NICOLE
811.62
dd
02/10106
WOLFGRAM, MARY
52.00
dd
02/10106
GROPPOLI, LINDA
302.40
dd
02/10106
ANDERSON, MATT
33.25
dd
02/10106
BEHAN, JAMES
1,712.95
dd
02/10106
LONETTI, JAMES
1,377.79
dd
02/10106
PATTERSON, ALBERT
1,25737
dd
02/10106
PRINS, KELLY
1,248.59
dd
02/10106
REILLY, MICHAEL
1,674.15
dd
02/10106
SCHOENECKER, LEIGH
113.05
dd
02/10106
AICHELE, CRAIG
1,950.81
dd
02/10106
PRIEM, STEVEN
2,187.94
dd
02/10106
WOEHRLE, MATTHEW
1,609.97
dd
02/10106
BERGO, CHAD
2,355.82
dd
02/10106
FOWLDS, MYCHAL
2,363.23
dd
02/10106
FRANZEN, NICHOLAS
1,907.80
wf
104028
02/10106
BARTOL, DAVID
397.80
wf
104029
02/10106
LONGRIE. DIANA
452.00
wf
104030
02/10106
WORKMAN, ROBERT
50.00
wf
104031
02/10106
JAHN, DAVID
1,638.86
wf
104032
02/10106
MORIN, TROY
157.25
wf
104033
02/10106
THOMAS, MOLLY
672.00
wf
104034
02/10106
MATHEYS, ALANA
2,059.18
wf
104035
02/10106
HANSEN, LORI
1,81335
wf
104036
02/10106
GENNOW, PAMELA
520.00
I
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
104037
02/10106
PALANK, MARY
1,703.66
wf
104038
02/10106
SVENDSEN, JOANNE
1,85539
wf
104039
02/10106
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
3,268.81
wf
104040
02/10106
TRAN, JOSEPH
2,331.55
wf
104041
02/10106
WELCHLIN, CABOT
2,96930
wf
104042
02/10106
BAUMAN, ANDREW
280.00
wf
104043
02/10106
FREBERG, RONALD
2,038.00
wf
104044
02/10106
EDSON, DAVID
1,932.28
wf
104045
02/10106
HELEY, ROLAND
1,932.28
wf
104046
02/10106
HINNENKAMP, GARY
1,973.43
wf
104047
02/10106
LINDORFF, DENNIS
1,897.98
wf
104048
02/10106
NOVAK, MICHAEL
1,85735
wf
104049
02/10106
GERNES, CAROLE
645.94
wf
104050
02/10106
SOUTTER, CHRISTINE
26438
wf
104051
02/10106
DANNER, BRENDA
40.50
wf
104052
02/10106
BERGER, STEPHANIE
394.00
wf
104053
02/10106
BROZAK, ANNA
66.00
wf
104054
02/10106
BROZAK, KATHERINE
367.50
wf
104055
02/10106
BURNS, BETH
19.50
wf
104056
02/10106
CHOINIERE, CHARLES
33.00
wf
104057
02/10106
CICCHESE, JOHNATHAN
31.50
wf
104058
02/10106
DANIELS, DANIELLE
42.00
wf
104059
02/10106
DEVANEY, KRISTI
19.50
wf
104060
02/10106
GOODRICH, DANIELLE
112.00
wf
104061
02/10106
GREENER, DOUGLAS
45.00
wf
104062
02/10106
HANNIGAN, BRADY
55.00
wf
104063
02/10106
HANSEN, KATHERINE
31.50
wf
104064
02/10106
HAWKES, SCOTT
45.00
wf
104065
02/10106
HELKAMP, KAYLA
155.00
wf
104066
02/10106
JOHNSON, ALEXANDER
45.00
wf
104067
02/10106
JOHNSON, ARIANNE
31.50
wf
104068
02/10106
JUETTNER, MICHAEL
19.50
wf
104069
02/10106
KISCH, ALEX
31.50
wf
104070
02/10106
KLEIN, AARON
126.00
wf
104071
02/10106
KLEM. JOSH
107.00
wf
104072
02/10106
KOHLMAN, JENNIFER
154.00
wf
104073
02/10106
LANCETTE, JOSHUA
64.50
wf
104074
02/10106
MILTON, ZACHARY
21.00
wf
104075
02/10106
NICHOLS, SAMUEL
64.50
wf
104076
02/10106
NICHOLSON, COLIN
39.00
wf
104077
02/10106
OHLHAUSER, MOLLY
60.00
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
ius
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
104078
02/10106
ROBBINS, EMERALD
108.00
wf
104079
02/10106
ROELLER, MICHAEL
21.00
wf
104080
02/10106
ROERING, KATELYN
32.50
wf
104081
02/10106
RUNNING, DUSTIN
120.00
wf
104082
02/10106
SERGOT, COLLIN
127.50
wf
104083
02/10106
SHOBERG, KARI
127.88
wf
104084
02/10106
SIKORA, JACOB
49.00
wf
104085
02/10106
SIKORA, NATHAN
26.25
wf
104086
02/10106
SIKORA, PAUL
80.00
wf
104087
02/10106
STACKPOLE, QUINN
33.75
wf
104088
02/10106
TARR -JR, GUS
24.00
wf
104089
02/10106
YORKOVICH, BRADLEY
110.00
wf
104090
02/10106
ZIELINSKI, JESSICA
38.75
wf
104091
02/10106
HAAG, MARK
1,859.85
wf
104092
02/10106
NADEAU, EDWARD
3,061.98
wf
104093
02/10106
GLASS, JEAN
1,868.83
wf
104094
02/10106
HER, CHONG
311.00
wf
104095
02/10106
HER, PHENG
166.15
wf
104096
02/10106
NAGEL, BROOKE
27335
wf
104097
02/10106
SIMPSON, JOSEPH
316.70
wf
104098
02/10106
TOLBERT, FRANCINE
280.00
wf
104099
02/10106
ANDERSON, CALEB
76.00
wf
104100
02/10106
ANDERSON, JOSHUA
102.75
wf
104101
02/10106
ANDERSON, JUSTIN
102.75
wf
104102
02/10106
ARNEVIK, ERICA
17.50
wf
104103
02/10106
BRENEMAN, SEAN
28.80
wf
104104
02/10106
CLARK, PAMELA
150.65
wf
104105
02/10106
COSTA, JOSEPH
442.50
wf
104106
02/10106
DEMPSEY, BETH
139.80
wf
104107
02/10106
FENGER, JUSTIN
82.46
wf
104108
02/10106
GRANT, MELISSA
339.15
wf
104109
02/10106
GRUENHAGEN, LINDA
504.45
wf
104110
02/10106
HAGSTROM, EMILY
148.99
wf
104111
02/10106
IRISH, PETER
71.75
wf
104112
02/10106
KROLL, MARK
156.75
wf
104113
02/10106
LUTZ, CHRISTINA
44.00
wf
104114
02/10106
MELLEN, CHRISTOPHER
81.00
wf
104115
02/10106
NWANOKWALE, MORDY
97.50
wf
104116
02/10106
PEHOSKI, JOEL
101.54
wf
104117
02/10106
PETERSON, ANNA
59.50
wf
104118
02/10106
RICHTER, NANCY
272.00
ius
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
NE
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
104119
02/10106
ROSTRON, ROBERT
110.55
wf
104120
02/10106
RYDEEN, ARIEL
341.05
wf
104121
02/10106
SCHMIDT, EMILY
190.28
wf
104122
02/10106
SCHMIDT, JOHN
63.63
wf
104123
02/10106
SCHOENECKER, SAMANTHA
40.80
wf
104124
02/10106
SCHRAMM, BRITTANY
41.40
wf
104125
02/10106
SCHREINER, MICHELLE
208.16
wf
104126
02/10106
SMITLEY, SHARON
383.20
wf
104127
02/10106
STAHNKE, AMY
183.50
wf
104128
02/10106
WARNER, CAROLYN
167.65
wf
104129
02/10106
WEDES, CARYL
140.10
wf
104130
02/10106
WENZEL, SHANNON
19.50
wf
104131
02/10106
WOODMAN, ALICE
239.00
wf
104132
02/10106
ZALK, IDA
68.25
wf
104133
02/10106
BOSLEY, CAROL
31590
wf
104134
02/10106
KLINKHAMER. KATIE
37.50
wf
104135
02/10106
LEWIS, AMY
175.00
wf
104136
02/10106
ODDEN, JESSICA
58.80
wf
104137
02/10106
OIE. REBECCA
164.75
wf
104138
02/10106
PARAYNO, GUAI
214.63
wf
104139
02/10106
SATTLER, CASSANDRA
24.60
wf
104140
02/10106
SATTLER, MELINDA
72.60
wf
104141
02/10106
STODGHILL, AMANDA
74.25
wf
104142
02/10106
VAN HALE, PAULA
136.95
wf
104143
02/10106
ZAGER, LINNEA
70.73
wf
104144
02/10106
BALDWIN, JANA
51.80
wf
104145
02/10106
BERLIN, SARAH
149.63
wf
104146
02/10106
BIRKHOLZ, TYLER
50.80
wf
104147
02/10106
DOUGLASS, TOM
1,46136
wf
104148
02/10106
EVERSON, KYLE
47.63
wf
104149
02/10106
GADOW, ANNA
34.93
wf
104150
02/10106
O'GRADY, VICTORIA
121.63
wf
104151
02/10106
OLSON, CHRISTINE
11638
wf
104152
02/10106
SCHULZE, KEVIN
47.63
wf
104153
02/10106
THEESFELD, CALEB
27.80
wf
104154
02/10106
VANG, HUE
83.13
wf
104155
02/10106
VANG, KAY
125.10
wf
104156
02/10106
VANG, TIM
59.08
wf
104157
02/10106
VUE, LOR PAO
242.73
487,652.17
NE
Agenda Item H2
T{): City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Planner
SUBJECT. Final Plat
PROJECT. Maple%ree TownhoNMes
LOCATION: 2811-2O27South|awnDrive
DATE: February 17.2O00
Mr. Jon Brandt is requesting that the city council approve the final plat for the Mapletree
TovvnhVnn8G. Mr. Brandt is the developer and builder of the project. This final plat will create nine
lots for the townhouses and 10 lots for the garage units. This plat will b8 west OfGVVth|8vvn
Drive, south Of Beam Avenue. (See the maps 0n pages two -fivR]
BACKGROUND
[hl September 27 the city council approved the preliminary plat and project deeigOp|8nS
for the K48p|8LrR8 Townhouses. These approvals were subject to several conditions. /P|R8s8 see
the council nninUL9S Starting on page six.)
DISCUSSION
The developer is progressing with the construction of the plat. To date, the contractor has
completed the rough grading of the site, the installation of the utilities and driveway and has
nearly finished the first 3-unit building. The developer has finished all the conditions the council
required for final plat approval.
Approve the final plat for the K88 Townhouse date-stamped January 24 This
approval is subject to the county recording the deeds, deed restrictions and covenants required
by the city and the developer meeting all the conditions of the city engineer.
p:aao3-28/Mapletn*eTH Hno| plat
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Address Map
3. Proposed Final Plat
4. Approved Preliminary Plat
G. September 27.2OU4. City Council Minutes
6. Proposed Final Plat (Separate Attachment)
Z\
N
2$38
2839
232 z
2323
3 2831 o ?...,
281
281 SITE RADATZ AVE
t
31 ' .. ..
3 3'' �
281
280
...',
....:
.:.,. .
IIvvd
277
Pa
Z MES
......... ...:... ... =i
Address Map
Mapletree Townhomes
3
W
Attachment 3
7t t w 4/4,. Cr
TWX 042Z qAUSEY CC— 4W
i k
1.47,
899.E rMt (V rK K e/+ OP TW St f/4 I
'
` - R
i s
m t
i �
�
4
111
vNwin
4
JA 0
$$
u iy
t
F
8
A$S OF LOT 9 WXM p e
p
`
a �i6
T$ 192
r
1
F`
w
4@ $ $/
7KE SE ,,
r
_
t2.
fto.x
�—
3
M tr FM
top IM fm'M Moo Mu Cr
Sam
w
9
Y
4
�!
ot
t
IQ
5
64
Ff i3
+
#54F
a
@A
P3
w
f+ �
! 4
5
®.0
9� 9/4 " TNg t/#
CR'C
p. $p41$
x
hk'pt6daxbk
PROPOSED FINAL PLAT
W
Attachment 4
Attachment
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:02 P'M' Monday, September 27, 2004
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 04-22
A. CALL T0ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Kathleen JU8nenl8nn,COUnci|nlenlb8r Present
Marvin KVppen.00Unci|nn8nnber Present
Jackie K8on8h8n-JUnek.00Vnci|nn8nnber Present
Will Ro3sb8oh Present
1. Project Reconsideration -Mapketr8RTownhouses |GvvnDriv8\
a. Preliminary Plat
b. Design Approval
a. City Manager FVrsn18n presented the report.
b. Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report.
C. Jon Brandt, the developer provided further specifics.
Counoi|nnennberKoppen moved to approve the Mapletree Townhomes preliminarV
plat (received by the city on September 8, 2004).
The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat:
1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
8. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and
meet all city requirements.
b. Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs 8i the grading limits.
C. Pay the City for the cost of traffic-control, street identification and no-parking signs.
d. Provide all required and necessary easements (including all utility easements and ten-
foot drainage and utility easements along the front and rear lot lines Of each lot and
five-foot drainage and utility easements along the side lot lines of each lot).
2. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, and street plans. The plans
City Council Mc@ting 09'27'04
shall meet all the conditions and changes listed in the memo dated September 16, 2004,
and shall meet the following conditions:
8. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code.
b. The grading plan Sh8||:
(1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home
site. The |[t lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary p|8L
(2) |Ddud8 Q2DtOUr iDfOrnl8tiOD for all the land that the construction will disturb.
(3) Show housing pads that reduce the grading where the developer can save large
trees.
/4\ Show the parking lot and driveway grades 88 allowed bv the city engineer.
(5) Include the tree plan that:
(8) 8h0vvs vvh8r8 the developer will r9nlov9 S8v8 or replace large trees. This
plan shall include 8n inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
(b) Shows no tree rennOv8| beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
KD Show drainage areas and the developer's engineer shall provide the city
engineer with the drainage calculations. The drainage design shall
8CC0[n[n0d8tS the runoff from the site and from the surrounding 8r8oS.
c. The driveway, parking lot and utility plans shall show the:
/1\ Water service to each lot and unit.
(2) Repair of Southlawn Drive (street and boulevard) after the developer connects to
the public utilities and builds the private driveways.
3. Paying for costs related b] the engineering department's review of the construction plans.
4. Change the plat aafollows:
a. Add drainage and utility easements as required bv the city engineer. This shall
include an easement for the water main and easements for any other public utilities
OD the site. The Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRVVS) shall approve the
description and location Of the easement for the water main.
b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These
easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet
wide along the side property lines.
c. Label the common area 8s[)VUVtA.
City Council Me7ting09'27'04
5. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including any off-site
drainage and utility easements.
8. The developer shall QOOlp|RtG all grading for public inlprOv8nl8ntS and 0v8r@|| site
drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that
the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval.
7. U n8CeS38ry. obtain 8 permit from the Ramsey-Washington K8etnn Watershed District for
grading.
8. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community
development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
9. Submitting the homeowners' association bylaws and rules to the city for approval by the
director Of community development. These are bD assure that there will beone
responsible party for the maintenance of the private utilities, parking areas, driveways,
landscaping and common areas.
10. Record the following with the final plat:
a. All homeowners' association documents.
b. A covenant or association documents that addresses the proper installation,
maintenance and replacement of any retaining walls.
The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the city
for approval before recording.
1 1.0btain a N PDES construction permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Seconded bvCoVnd|nn8mb8r K8on8han'JUnHk /yeS'A||
Councilmember Monahan-Junek moved to approve the plans date-stamped September 8,
2004, (site plan, grading and drainage plans and building elevations) for the Mapletree
Townhomes on the west side of Southlawn Drive.
The developer O[ contractor shall do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
3. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit:
8. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. lFh8S8
plans shall include: grading, utility, dn@iO8g8. 8n0aiOD control, tree, sidewalk and
driveway and parking lot plans. The plans shall meet the h}Uovvin0 conditions:
(1) The erosion control plan shall be consistent with city code.
City Council Mc8ting 09'27'04
CZ\ The grading plan shall:
/m\ Include building, floor elevation and contour information.
(b) |n[jUdH contour information for the land that the construction will disturb.
(o) Show sedimentation basins Or ponds aS may be required bv the watershed
board Vrby the city engineer.
(d) Show all proposed slopes steeper than 3:1OD the proposed construction
plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and
management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1.This shall include
covering these slopes with wood-fiber blankets and seeding them with a
"no mow" vegetation rather than using sod Orgrass.
/e\ Show all retaining walls Vn the plans. Any retaining vv8||s more than four
feet tall require 8 building permit from the city.
/M Show 8S little disturbance and tree removal @S possible OD the west and
south sides of the site (near the p8rk).
(3) The tree plan shall:
(8) B8 approved bv the city engineer before site grading.
(b) Include 8n inventory Of all existing large trees OD the site and shall show
where the developer will remove, save Or replace large trees.
(c) Show the size, species and location Vf the replacement trees. The
deciduous trees shall beot least two and one half /21/2\ inches in
diameter and shall beo mix of red and white oaks and sugar maples.
(d) Be consistent with the approved grading and landscape plans and shall
show nO tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
(4) All the parking areas and driveways shall have continuous concrete curb and
gutter except where the city engineer decides that itiS not needed.
(5) The design of the ponding area and the rainwater garden(s) shall be subject to
the approval Vf the city engineer. The developer shall b8 responsible for
getting any needed off-site utility, grading or drainage easements and for
recording all necessary easements.
(8) The driveways shall meet the following standards:
24-foot width--no parking on either side and 28-foot width--parking on one
side
The developer Or contractor shall post the driveways with no parking signs
to meet the above-listed standards.
City Council 09'27'04
(7) The developer shall disturb @3 little 8s possible Of the area along the west and
south pnJp8dv |iO8a. The applicant Sh8U ChGOgS the grading p|@D for this Dart
[f the site 8s recommended by the city engineer.
b. Submit a certificate of survey for all new construction and have each building staked
by a registered land surveyor.
c. Submit revised landscape and tree plans k} city staff for approval that incorporates the
following details and that meet the following requirements:
M\ All trees would be consistent with city standards for size, location and species.
(2) The maple trees must be at least 2 1/2 inches in caliper, balled and burlapped.
(3) The manicured Or mowed areas from the natural areas. This shall include
planting (instead Cf sodding) the disturbed areas around the ponding area and
the rainwater gardens with native grasses and native flowering plants. The
native grasses and flowering plants shall b8 those needing little OrOO
rn8inL8n8nc8 and shall extend at |88Gi four feet from the ordinary high vvGt8r
mark /{}HVVKX\of the pond. This isto reduce maintenance costs and bJreduce
the temptation of mowers to encroach into the gardens. Specifically, the
developer shall have the natural areas seeded with 8n upland mixture and
lowland mixtures as appropriate.
(4) The plantings proposed around the front Of the units shown OO the landscape
plan date-stamped May 24, 2004, shall remain on the plan.
(5) Foundation plantings near and around the buildings and additional screening
(with trees and other materials) between the proposed buildings and Southlawn
Drive.
(0) In addition to the above, the contractor shall sod all front, side and rear yard
areas (except for mulched and edged planting beds and the area within the
p0nding8rR@\.
(7) The contractor shall restore the SoUth|8vvn [)hw8 boulevard with sod.
(8) Shows where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan
shall include 8n inventory of all existing large trees on the site and shall show 8S
nnVCh of the existing vegetation (including trees) remaining 8|VnQ the vv8St8r|y
and southerly property lines. |D addition, this plan shall show the planting Of@t
least 1O replacement trees On the site.
(S) Adding ten more evergreen trees (B|8tk W|||s spruce or Austrian pines) 8|VnQ the
north and east property lines Of the site (in Detail areas C and D\. These trees
are tobeat least six feet tall and the contractor shall plant these trees in
staggered rows on the berm.
/1O\ Shows the size, species and location Of the replacement trees. The deciduous
City Council MqOng 09'27'04
trees shall be at least two and one half CZ1/2\ inches in diameter and shall be a
mix of red and white oaks and sugar maples.
(11) Shows the in-ground lawn-irrigation system.
M2\ Shall be approved bv the city engineer before site grading and shall be
consistent with the approved grading and landscape plans.
(13) Shows no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
d. Submit an in-ground lawn-irrigation plan to staff showing the location of sprinkler
heads.
e. Get the necessary approvals and permits from the watershed district.
Submit a revised site lighting o|8nfbrcUvapprOv8i This plan shall show how the
lighting on the buildings would add to the site lighting, and the plan should have
additional lighting along the main driveway, 3Oitis adequately lit. This plan also shall
show details about the proposed light fixtures tO ensure they are 8 design that hides
the bulb and lens from view to avoid nuisances. The light fixtures must have
concealed lenses and bulbs b] properly shield glare from the adjacent street riQht-0f'
vvoy3andfronn adjacent residential properties. This plan shall also show details
about the white-colored freestanding lights that were displayed and approved at the
June 22, 2004. community design review board meeting.
g. Have the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) approve the proposed utility
plans.
h. The fire chief shall approve the access to the back (west side) of the buildings for
firefighting needs.
Submit plans for city staff approval for any outdoor trash or recycling containers and
enclosures. If the developer wants to build such f8Ci|itkfS. the 9nC|VSUn8 Sh8U have
materials that are compatible with the buildings, and they shall have gates that are
1OO percent opaque.
Submit for city staff approval revised building plans and elevations that show or
include (but are not limited to) white shutters, white window grids, white balcony
n8i|ingS, ovvhite-oO|0nad trim band |OC@had between the two stories oDthe north, vve3t.
and east elevations of the townhouses that separates the two beige colors Vfvinyl
siding, and that provide more detail about the brick nr stone accents. These plans
also should reflect that all utility meters are located OD the north side Ofeach
townhouse, OD the lower level, within the recessed area.
k. Submit for city staff approval the site and building plans and elevations for the garage
buildings. These buildings shall be8t least 1O feet apart and shall have o style, finish,
rnateho|S and colors consistent with the main buildings on the Site.
i Present to staff for approval color building elevations or building material samples of
all elevations of the townhouses and garages. These elevations should show that
City Council Mqeting 09'27'04
the townhouses will have two-tones Cf beige-colored vinyl siding Vn the north, west,
and east elevations with a white trim band separating the two stories; have two-tones
of beige-colored vinyl siding on the second story and either brick or stone accents on
the first story of the south elevation. These elevations also should show that the
garages would have G beige-colored vinyl siding with 8 wainscot Vf brick Vrstone.
nn. Provide the city with a letter ofcredit or cash escrow for all required exterior
improvements. The amount shall Ue15O percent Vf the cost Cf the work.
3. Complete the following before occupying 88chbUi|ding:
@. Replace property irons that are removed because Of this construction.
b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. Sod all landscaped areas, except for the area
within the easement, which may beseeded.
c. Install continuous concrete curb and gutter along all interior driveways and around all
open parking Gt8||S.
d. |n3t8|| nafleCtorized stop signs sdthe exit, a hand iCop-p8rkin8 sign for each handicap-
parking space and addresses on each building for each unit. |n addition, the
applicant shall install ''nV parking" signs within the Site, as n8qVin]U by staff.
R. Construct trash dumpster and recycling enclosures as city code requires for any
dumpsters or storage containers that the owner or building manager would keep
outside the building. Any such enclosures must match the materials and colors 0fthe
building.
f. Install and maintain all required landscaping and an in-ground sprinkler system for all
landscaped areas (code nequirenn8nU.
0. |OSt@|| 0D-site lighting for security and visibility that follows the approved site lighting
plan. All exterior lighting shall follow the approved lighting plan that shows the light
spread and fixture design. The light fixtures must have concealed lenses and bulbs
to properly shield glare from the adjacent street right-of-ways and the nearby homes
and residential properties.
h. Install 8six-h}Vthi hSV|iUsCre8ninQf9nC8Vr8ddiUVn8|kandsC8pinga|Vngth888st
and north property lines of the site where the vegetation does not adequately screen
the town houses and the parking areas from the businesses and the existing
dwellings. These additional nl@t9h@|s GPS h3 eDSU[8 there is at least six-foot-tall, GO
percent opaque screen on these sides 0f the site. The location, design and materials
of the fence or the additional landscaping shall be subject to city staff approval.
i. The developer or contractor shall:
(1) Complete all grading for the site drainage, complete all public improvements and
meet all city requirements.
City Council 09'27'04
(2) Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs @tth8gn@ding|inlitS.
(3) Remove any debris 0rjunk from the site.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
8. The {ib/ determines that the work is not es88nU8| to the public health, safety or
b. The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held bv the city for all
required exterior improvements. The owner 0r contractor shall complete any
unfinished landscaping by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or
within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
c. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director Vf community development
may approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All
City Council 09'27'04
Agenda Item H3
To: City Manager Richard Fursman
From: Chief of Police David J. Thomalla
Subject: Purchase of Police Vehicles
Date: January 17, 2006
Introduction
Money was allocated in the 2006 budget to purchase vehicles, and we are requesting
authorization to order six 2006 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor squad cars.
Background
Police departments are able to place orders for squad cars until mid - March, 2006, and we
purchase them in conjunction with the State of Minnesota and many other municipal departments.
The vehicles must be ordered now for delivery later this year.
The State contract price for the squad cars is $20,596 each.
Recommendation
It is recommended that authorization be given to purchase six 2006 Ford Crown Victoria Police
Interceptor squad cars.
Action Required
Submit to the City Council for review and approval.
DJT /mkp
Agenda Item H4
To: City Manager Richard Fursman
From: Chief nf Police David J.ThnmaUo
Subject Acceptance nf Funds from 2005 JAG Grant
Date: February 17.2OO6
Introduction
City Council approval isrequired to accept funds awarded from the 200GJustice
Assistance Grant and authorize the appropriate budget modifications.
Background
The Maplewood Police Department was included in a grant the St. Paul Police Department
received from the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The 2UU5 Collaborative Justice Assistance Grant
(JAG) included Ramsey County, Roseville, and Maplewood in the award to St. Paul. The
Maplewood portion of this grant ioS14 The Police Department intends to use this funding hu
enhance the Department's Crime Multi-Housing Program. The money will provide overtime dollars
to provide training for and services associated with this program. Some funds will also be used for
program equipment and literature, asneeded. Maplewood has until September 9O.2O08toexpend
these funds.
Recommendation
Approve acceptance of the JAG funds and authorize the appropriate budget adjustments. The
interlocal agreement required to participate in this grant has been reviewed and approved by the
City Attorney's Office
Action Required
Submit to the City Council for review and action.
Agenda Item H5
To: City Manager Richard Fursman
From: Chief nf Police David J.ThnmaUo
Subject Acceptance of Funds from 2005 BZPP Grant
Date: February 16.2OO6
Introduction
City Council approval is required to accept funds awarded from the 2005 Buffer Zone
Protection Grant and authorize the appropriate budget modifications.
Background
The Maplewood Police Department received o grant from the Minnesota Division of Homeland
Security ao part of the Buffer Zone Protection Plan (BZPP). Infrastructure within the City of
Maplewood was identified by the Minnesota Division of Homeland Security and Emergency
Management making K4op|avvnod eligible for funding to protect this critical infrastructure.
Maplewood was notified in late 2005 that $48,378 had been awarded to us as part of this program.
In applying for this grant, the Police Department specified this money would be used to purchase
enough encrypted 8O0 MHz radios to provide one for each supervisor. These radios were not
included in the original purchase of80U MHz radios through Ramsey County. Additional 8O0MHz
equipment would also be purchased through this grant to be used for radio alarm systems which
could be placed invulnerable locations osneeded. The original deadline ho expend these funds
was March 31.2000. This has now been extended for 12 months until the 8OO MHz radio system is
functional.
Recommendation
Approve acceptance of the BZPP funds and authorize the appropriate budget adjustments.
Action Required
Submit to the City Council for review and action.
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
It has been past practice to permit the carry over from one year to the next of unspent monies for
specific purposes. This involves reductions in the 2005 Budget and corresponding increases in the
2006 Budget.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the following carry over requests.
Fund Amount Account No. For
General Fund
$6,000
101-201-4480
Audit fees
General Fund
22,290
101-301-4630
Business license software
General Fund
2,710
101-301-4390
Training for business license software
Capital Improvements
Projects Fund
54,700
405-000-4759
Sidewalks
Legacy Village Park
Development Fund
79,435
433-000-4720
Legacy Village Park Development
Sewer Lift Station #18
Project Fund
46,725
435-000-4759
Sewer Lift Station #18
Public Works Building
Addition Project Fund
587,820
427-000-4660
Public Works Building Addition Project
$799,680 Total for all funds
P:\FINANCE\WORDtAGN\BUDGCARR.DOC
Agenda Item H7
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Purchase of Single-Axle Plow Truck Body and Plow[Wing Attachment
DATE: February 13, 2006
INTRODUCTION
The 2006 Public Works capital outlay budget includes funds for replacement of one 1991 single-axle plow
truck with a plow/wing attachment. The truck chassis was purchased from Boyer Ford and is scheduled for
delivery in May.
Background
Public Works Fleet Management Department requested proposals to equip the plow truck with a dump
body and plow/wing attachment. The state bid prices were received from Aspen Equipment for one dump
body at a cost of $43,590.16, and J-Craft Equipment for one plow/wing attachment at a cost of $18,598.10,
tax included on both bids.
It is recommended that the city council authorize entering into a contract with Aspen Equipment, under
State Contract #433309, and J-Craft Equipment, under State Contract #435403, for the purchase of one
single-axle truck body and one plow/wing attachment at a combined cost of $62,188.26.
Agenda Item H8
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard FUnGm@D City Manager
FROM: Ch@rl8S/\hl Public Works Director/City Engineer
Bill Priefe[ Works Operations Analyst
SUBJECT: Sewer Use/Connection Agreement with the City of WoK»dbury— North of
Highwood Avenue
DATE: February 21.2006
Maplewood Sewer District 51 (W), the New Century Development, was connected to the Qty of
VV0OdbUn/s sanitary sewer system in2000. However, G formal written agreement addressing the
connection, the sewage treatment costs and the repair and maintenance costs was never done byeither
city. To rectify this oversight, a formal sewer use/connection agreement was drafted and is attached for
council consideration and approval.
BACKGROUND
In 2000, the City of Woodbury constructed sanitary sewer in the Century Avenue right OfvvGyhDprOvd8
sewer service to both Maplewood and Woodbury residences on Century Avenue between Highwood and
Linwood Avenues. This also allowed development and construction [f the New Century development north
and west nf Century and HighvvoodAvenues. Five residential connections were initially made in20OO.
There are currently 147 sanitary sewer connections that were connected during 2OU8 through 2005.
MaplewOd'S Sewer District 510N\ flows into the City of WOodbUry's sanitary sewer system and ultimately
Uln}VQh the downstream K88Ln]pV|b8n Council Environmental Services (K8{|ES) meter which is then billed L0
Woodbury for sewage treatment costs. The sewage treatment costs billed h0 Woodbury for the Maplewood
flow from 20OU through 2U05 were $55 Reimbursement will be made to the City Of Woodbury upon
approval of the attached sewer use/connection agreement. MCES will then adjust future sewage treatment
COStS sO that Maplewood is billed for District 51 /VV\ flow and Woodbury is credited.
The sewer use/connection agreement allows Maplewood to connect toVVO0dbUn/s sanitary sewer system
for the sole purpose Vf conveying sewage into VVooUbVry'Ssystem. Maplewood will also pay $2OU per year
to the City of Woodbury for routine maintenance on the Woodbury line that connects Maplewood to the
K8CES[n8tRr. For major rRp@i[S0r[8p|@CS[nSOt.K8Gp|Svv0Od@DdVVO0dbu[yvvi||podicipGt8iDthGCOStin
proportion to the daily flow originating from each City.
Request council approval of a sewer use/connection agreement with the City of Woodbury, and authorize
the appropriate budget change in the Sewer Fund to reimburse Woodbury for sewage treatment costs.
Ax*ohmomo:
1. Sewer Use/Connection Agreement with the City w*Woodbury
2. Location Map (Color copies provided to City Council)
Agenda Item H8
SEWER USEXONNECTION AGREEMENT
This agreement, made and entered into this day of , 2006, by the City of
Maplewood (hereinafter "Maplewood "), a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, and
the City of Woodbury (hereinafter "Woodbury "), a municipal corporation of the State of
Minnesota.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises made herein,
the parties agree as follows:
RECITALS
1) WHEREAS, Maplewood has requested permission from Woodbury to connect a
portion of its public sanitary sewer system to the Woodbury sanitary sewer system for the purpose
of transporting sanitary sewage from Maplewood's Sewer District 51(W), and the following
agreement is intended to reflect the mutual understanding and agreement to accomplish this
purpose.
2) WHEREAS, Maplewood and Woodbury understand and agree that the additional
sanitary sewer use shall require an increase to the rate to be paid by Maplewood as a part of the
parties joint sewer use.
In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, it is agreed by and between the
cities of Maplewood and Woodbury as follows:
SECTION 1
TERMS
1) Woodbury does hereby grant permission to Maplewood to connect Maplewood's sanitary
sewer conveying sanitary sewage from Maplewood's Sewer District 51(W), the New Century
Development, to the Woodbury sewer system east of Century Avenue South.
Agenda Item H8
2) The Maplewood sewer system to be connected to the Woodbury sewer system shall be
used solely for the purpose of conveying sanitary sewage, and Maplewood shall not permit or
allow any storm water runoff to be connected to the sewer system.
3) Maplewood shall be solely responsible for all maintenance, repairs and claims for damages
or injuries caused to any person or property whatsoever or from any cause whatsoever relating to
the properties or persons served by the Maplewood sanitary sewer. Maplewood agrees to hold
harmless, indemnify, and defend Woodbury from any and all claims for damages to persons or
property that arise or that may claim to arise from any reason relating to the sewers owned and
maintained by Maplewood and that are hereby authorized to be connected to the Woodbury sewer
system. Maplewood and Woodbury retain the right to select their own attorney should any cause
or dispute hereby arises related to this Sewer Use /Connection Agreement.
4) It is agreed between the parties hereto that the Metropolitan Council Environmental
Services (MCES) shall estimate the amount of sanitary sewage attributable to the Maplewood
properties hereby authorized to be connected to this Woodbury sewer system and shall
accordingly charge Maplewood for its proportionate cost of sewage treatment, conveyance, and
related costs in its annual billings. Woodbury and Maplewood shall cooperate with and provide
all necessary information to the MCES so as to permit the proper billing to Maplewood and credit
to Woodbury for this sewer use.
SECTION 2
BILLING
Woodbury shall maintain the sanitary sewer lines from the Maplewood connection to the
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) interceptor that consists of 1,221 feet of 12
inch line on Century Avenue South from the Maplewood connection to Courtly Road, then 1,133
feet of 12 inch line from Courtly Road to the 24 inch line south of Lake Ridge Townhomes then
2
Agenda Item H8
814 feet of 24 inch line from the manhole south of Lake Ridge Townhomes to the MCES
interceptor.
Maplewood shall pay $200.00 per year to Woodbury for said routine maintenance to be
performed on a cleaning schedule of once every four years. The charge to Maplewood represents
one -half of the cost to perform said maintenance. Woodbury shall submit an annual bill to
Maplewood before March ls of each year. This charge shall be annually adjusted on the
anniversary date of this agreement to reflect a proportional increase commensurate with the same
percentage increase experienced by the City of Woodbury for its sanitary sewer annual operating
Budget increase using 2006 as the base year.
For major maintenance, such as repairing or replacing the Woodbury sanitary sewer line
(pipe) or manholes, Maplewood and Woodbury will participate in the cost, including preliminary
engineering, detailed design and inspection, in proportion to the daily volume of flow originating
from each City.
SECTION 3
DURATION
This agreement shall be in force and in effect from 1 2006. Upon mutual
consent of Maplewood and Woodbury, this agreement may be amended and/or terminated at any
time. Each party will be liable for its share of costs as described in this Agreement in the billing
cycle incurred to of the date of the termination. After such termination, the parties shall have no
further obligation or responsibility under this agreement.
Upon 60 day written notice Maplewood may unilaterally terminate this agreement if all
sanitary sewer flow originating from Maplewood is removed from the Woodbury sanitary sewer
Agenda Item H8
line described in Section 2 and all Maplewood sanitary sewers are disconnected from the
Woodbury sanitary sewer line.
SECTION 4
MEETINGS
Maplewood, through its Public Works Department or designee, agrees to meet at the
request of Woodbury should any issues arise under this Agreement. The purpose of said meetings
shall be to discuss issues which affect the substantive rights of the parties under this Agreement.
The time and place of any such meeting, hereunder, shall be determined by the parties with
reasonable notice to one another. The parties retain the right to conduct meetings through other
electronic means as is acceptable to both parties.
SECTION 5
AGREEMENT SUBJECT TO DATA PRACTICES ACT
This agreement shall be subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act, at Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 13, comparable provisions and Federal law.
SECTION 6
MEDIATION OF DISPUTES
Any and all disputes between the parties under and concerning this agreement, including
its formation and the entering into the clause itself, shall be subject to mediation. The dispute
shall be submitted to a mediator selected and agreed upon by the parties within thirty (30) days. In
the event that the parties cannot agree to a mediator, a mediator shall be chosen by the Chief Judge
of the Ramsey County District Court. The costs of the mediation shall be equally divided between
the parties.
4
Agenda Item H8
SECTION 7
COMPLETENESS OF THE AGREEMENT
This document contains all the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and any alterations
or variations of the terms of this Agreement shall be invalid unless made in writing and signed by
the parties_ There are no other understandings, representations or agreements, written or oral, not
incorporated herein. If any part of this Agreement is declared null and void by law, the remaining
paragraphs of said agreement shall be valid.
SECTION 8
CONTROLLING LAW
This Agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota State law and Minn. Stat. § 471.59 (Joint
Exercise of Powers). In the event of a dispute, the laws of the State of Minnesota shall be
controlling.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on this
ZI
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
2006
Mayor
City Manager
Approved as to form by Legal Counsel
CITY OF WOODBURY
Mayor
City Administrator
Approved as to form by Legal Counsel
day
5
Agenda Item H8
SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT 51
=*Omgm- •
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Erin Laberee, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Venburg/Guldens T.H. 61 Frontage Road, City Project 04-04 (02-08) -
Resolution for Modification of Existing Construction Contract,
Change Orders 1, 2 and 3
DATE: February 17, 2006
During construction, there are often unforeseen changes from the original plans and
specifications. The city council will consider approving the attached resolution directing the
modification of the existing construction contract, Change Order Nos. 1, 2 and 3
Background
In April 2004, the city council approved the award of a construction contract to Imperial
Developers for the construction of the Venburg/Guldens Frontage Road.
Change Order's 1, 2 and 3 are summarized below.
Change Order 1 is for work completed to construct a bituminous flume at the temporary
driveway to the new frontage road to control erosion. The cost of the additional work is
$1,086.00.
The proposed Change Order 2 is for additional signage needed to direct traffic to Venburg's and
Guldens. A negotiated price of $426.00 is requested for Change Order 2.
Change Order 3 is for a flared end section that was required at the outlet of a 42 inch pipe into
the LaMettry Pond. The flared end section was not originally included in the contract and a price
was negotiated with the contractor for this change. The total cost of the work for Change Order
3 is $2,009.00.
Budget Impact
Approval of this resolution would increase the construction contract by $3,521.00. Change
Orders 1, 2 and 3 fall within the revised project budget approved by the city council at the
December 12, 2005, meeting. No budget revisions are required at this time.
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution directing the
modification of the existing construction contract, Change Orders 1, 2 and 3 for the
Venburg/Guldens Frontage Road, City Project 04-04 (02-08).
Attachments: Resolution
Change Order No. 1, 2 and 3
02-08 Location Map
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING K8{][)|F|C/\T|{]K] OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PROJECT 04-04 (02-08) CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
UrnpHh8| Contract)
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made
|nnpn]v8nl8rd Project 04-O4/02-O8\,VenUurg/GV|Uens Frontage Road, and has let 8
construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported that it is now necessary and expedient that
said contract b8 modified and designated 8S Improvement Pmec 04-0 (02-08) Change Order
Nos. 1'2. and 3asan increase to said contract bvan amount 0f$3 such that the new
contract amount is now and hereby established oS$428.337.34.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OFMAPLEVVOC)[}.
MINNESOTA that the mayor and city manager are hereby authorized tO sign ODbRh@KOfth8
City of Maplewood to signify and show that the existing contract is hereby modified through said
Change CJnd8r N0. 1, 2 and 3 GS 8 contract increase in the 8nn8Unt of $3.521.00. The revised
contract amount iGS42M.337.34.
No revisions to the project budget are proposed sd this time, o3 these changes
fall within the revised project budget approved by the city council on December 12, 2005.
Agenda M f
URS Copy
CRY Copy
Contractor Copy
CHANGE ORDER NO. I
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Project Name: Venburg / Guldens Grading, Utilities and Paving
Project No, City Project 02 -08 (04 -04) Date: 1/20/06
Contractor: Imperial Developers, Inc.
In accordance with the terms of this Contract, you are hereby authorized and instructed to perform the Work as altered by the following
provisions:
The City of Maplewood requested the contractor to construct a bituminous flume to control
erosion at the temporary driveway to the new Frontage Road adjacent to the Venburg/Guldens
project. The contractor provided a negotiated lump sum price for the work in the amount of
$ 1,086.00 / LS.
Description
Quantit
Unit Price
Extended Cost
Bituminous Flume
(1) each
$1,086.00
$ 1,086.00
Contract Status
Original Contract
Net Change of Prior Approved Contract Amendments
(Bid Alternate I — HDPE Pipe)
Approved Revised Contract
Net Change of Prior
Change Order No, 0
Change this Change Order:
Revised Contract (Pending):
Approval
Cost
$ 369,942.84
$ 54,823.50
$ 424,816.34
$ 0.00
$ 1,086.00
$ 425,902.34
Mayor
Approval
Engineer
Agreed to by Contractor
C.O. #1, Page I of 1
URS
CAY r•
Contractor . , •. y
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Project Name: Venburg 1 Guldens Grading, Utilities and Paving
Project No. City Project 02 -08 (04 -04) Date: 1120106
Contractor: Imperial Developers, Inc.
In accordance with the terms of this Contract, you are hereby authorized and instructed to perform the Work as altered by the following
provisions:
The City of Maplewood requested additional signage to direct traffic to the Venburg/Gulden site
during construction. The contractor provided a negotiated lump sum price for the signage in the
amount of $ 426.00.
Description
Quantit
Unit Price
Extended Cost
Construction Signs - Special
LS
$ 426.00
$ 426.04
Contract Status
Original Contract
Net Change of Prior Approved Contract Amendments
(Bid Alternate 1 — HDPE Pipe)
Approved Revised Contract
Net Change of Prior Pending
Change Order No. 1
Change this Change Order:
Revised Contract (Pending):
Approval
Cost
$ 369,942.84
$ 54,823.50
$ 424,816.34
$ 1,086.00
$ 426.00
$ 426,328.34
Mayor
Approval
Engineer
Agreed to by Contractor
C.O. #2, Page 1 of I
Agenda
URS .!
CIty Copy
Contractor •p
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORDS
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Project Name: Venburg I Guldens Grading, Utilities and Paving
Project No. City Project 02 -08 (04 -04)
Contractor: Imperial Developers, Inc.
Date: 1120106
In accordance with the terms of this Contract, you are hereby authorized and instructed to perform the Work as altered by the following
provisions:
During construction of proposed storm sewer, it was determined a flared end section would be
required at the discharge of the new 42" HDPE storm sewer at the discharge point into the
LaMettry Pond. This flared end section was not listed in the contract unit prices. The contractor
provided a negotiated lump sum price for the work in the amount of $ 2,009.00.
Description Quantit Unit Price Extended Cost
HDPE Flared End Section LS $ 2,009.00 $ 2,009,00
Contract Status
Original Contract
Net Change of Prior Approved Contract Amendments
(Bid Alternate 1 — HDPE Pipe)
Approved Revised Contract
Net Change of Prior Pending
Change Order No. I & 2
Change this Change Order:
Revised Contract (Pending):
Approval
Cost
$ 369,942.84
$ 54,823.50
$ 424,816.34
$ 1,512.00
$ 2,009.00
$ 428,337.34
Mayor
Approval
Engineer
Agreed to by Contractor
C.O. #3, Page I of 1
i * � � ■•
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Erin Laberee, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, City Project 04-15:
Resolution for Modification of the Existing Construction Contract,
Change Order 2 and 3
DATE: February 17, 2006
During construction there are often unforeseen changes from the original plans and specifications.
The city council will consider approving the attached resolution directing the modification of the
existing construction contract and revising the project financing plan to reflect these changes.
Background
In April 2004, the city council approved the award of construction contract to T.A. Schifsky for the
Gladstone North Area Street Improvements. Change Orders 2 and 3 are summarized below.
The changes described in Change Order 2 total $3,672.68. The changes are in the scope of the
sanitary sewer service repair at 197011974 Dieter Street which grew to include 1961 Dieter Street.
Additional work required by the contractor included PVC piping, PVC fittings, special couplings and
crew time for trenching and trench compaction.
The changes described in Change Order 3 total $11,499.12. The changes are drainage
improvements at 1490 Ryan, 1970 Barclay, 1961 and 1973 Dieter designed by the City of
Maplewood staff, along with additional Class 6 gravel required throughout the project for additional
parking areas, access roads and driveways.
Change Order No. 2 and 3 will increase the contract amount to $1,795,235.55.
Budget Impact
No increase in the project budget for the Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, Project 04-15,
is required as these extras fall within the original approved budget.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution directing the modification of
the existing construction contract for the Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, City Project
04-15.
Attachments: Resolution
Change Order No. 2 and 3
Location Map
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PROJECT 04-15
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Project 04-15, Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, and has let a
construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported that it is now necessary and expedient
that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 04-15, Change Order
No. 2, and 3, as an increase to said contract by an amount of $15,171.80, such that the new
contract amount is now and hereby established as $1,795,235.55.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city manager are hereby authorized to
sign on behalf of the City of Maplewood to signify and show that the existing contract is
hereby modified through said Change Order No. 2 and 3 as a contract increase in the
amount of $15,171.80. The revised contract amount is $1,795,235.55.
No revisions to the project budget are proposed at this time, as these
changes fall within the original project budget.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Project Name: Gladstone North Area Street Improvement Project Change Order No.: 2
Project No.: 04-15 Date: 1-27-06
Contractor: T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc.
The following changes shall be made in the contract documents: (Work not covered under
contract)
Description Unit
Labor, equipment and material EA
to install service connections at
1970/1974 and 1961 Dieter St
Unit
Quantit Price Total
1 $3,672.68 $3,672.68
TOTAL $ 3,672.68
Original Contract: $1,766,328.58
Net Change of Prior Change
Order No. 1: $13,735.17
Change This Change Order: $3,672.68
Revised Contract: $1,783,736.43
Approved
Mayor
Recommended
Engineer
Agreed to by Contractor by
Its
Title
CHANGE ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Project Name: Gladstone North Area Street Improvement Project Change Order No.: 3
Project No.: 04-15 Date: 2-6-06
Contractor: T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc.
The following changes shall be made in the contract documents: (Work not covered under
contract)
Unit
Description Unit Quantit Price Total
Labor, equipment and material EA 1 $3,105.50 $3,105.50
to improve drainage at 1490 Ryan,
1970 Barclay, 1961 and 1973 Dieter.
Aggregate Base CL. 6 for added EA 1 �'- -* �*-R
parking, access roads and drives.
TOTAL $ 11,499.12
Original Contract: $1,766,328.58
Net Change of Prior Change
Order No. 1: $13,735.17
Order No. 2: $3,672.68
Change This Change Order: $11,499.12
Revised Contract: $1,795,235.55
Approved
Mayor
Recommended
Engineer
Agreed to by Contractor by
Its
Title
GERVAIS A VE.
GRAN DVI EW AVE.
36 L
VI KING
DR. U) SHERREN AVE. �--
Cn U) U) Knuckle Head Lake
COPE CT. COPE AVE. d
LARK AVE. C� LARK
Cn Q' cr z
° CO.
LRD. 0 v v Q Q LAURIE
CJ p Sherwood< E L-J LEALAND RD. _ 4 SAND HURST Of Pork z AVE.
JUNC =ON AVE. w CO.
Ti bk r - J � g � z
°- `T' q� BURKE BURKE AVE. v-i L URKE Z—
J,, F m
o ��•O T CN CIR ELDR IDGE AVE John Gle
U) -71
(10 N E. B MON LN. 0 4 � GATEWAY
SKILL �`P VE. O SKILLMAN
AVE. w HARRIS AVE.
> Q ROSEWOOD 1
D vi AVE W rr
—J =D) W Robinhood = ROSEWOOD
p ROAN J v w Park z R AN AV. AVE. S.
O
TRp`I Flicek w _ z C j V b,C
J Park F- U (/? Q n-
n I c� FR ST AVE.
fl
=E NTON AVE. W (A U)
g W
Z Gloster M ER AV E. v w SU MM�R AVE.
J ° Park m p
2 ry W
FRISBIE AVE. v Paakefield
rk
RIP LEY A E. —° z
Project location
no scale
Exhibit 1
P Locatio
Gladstone North Area Streets 04-1S
AGENDA NO. HII
FA91:4 • I BY- 1 1:91:4 a* 1011
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: Purchases from Employee-Owned Companies
At the February 13 Council meeting there was a discussion about alternative ways to
deal with employee purchases from employee-owned companies. A motion was
passed which tabled action on the item and directed "the City Attorney and staff to
establish a purchasing policy addressing employment issues and defining what
ownership interest means with regard to that purchasing policy" for the February 27
Council meeting. The proposed policy recommended by the City Attorney's staff is as
follows:
"Before making a purchase from, or entering into a contract with, a
business entity owned wholly, or in part, by an employee of the City
of Maplewood, City Employees must obtain at least two (2) price
quotes which are to be preserved for one (1) year after their receipt.
That purchase shall then be reviewed by the purchasing Employee's
supervisor to confirm that the decision to make a purchase from, or
enter into a contract with, the business entity owned wholly, or in
part, by the City employee is based on rational economic factors
including, but not limited to, price and availability of goods and
services.
A business entity owned wholly, or in part, by a City Employee shall
be defined as: an entity organized for profit, including an individual,
sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, joint venture,
association, or cooperative in which the City Employee or a member
of the City Employee's immediate family has a financial interest
excluding interests consisting solely of publicly issued stock holdings
constituting equal to or lesser than 5% of the entity's total public
stock issue.
A member the City Employee's immediate family is defined as: the
City Employee's spouse, the City Employee's child, the City
Employee's parent, or the City Employee's sibling."
P\agn\purchasing policy change 022706
Agenda Item H12
FAC140 I IDEA :14001 A
)CATE: February 21, 20CJ
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Richard Fursman
City Manager
NO 1111 111 11111 111;;11111111"
FII, l�ii IIII I • 1 • l
1 1111111 ! 11 !1f! • '1 11 l�"I 0 -
Council member Will Rossbach requests that the attached resolution be adopted by the City
Council supporting transportation revenues for public transit assistance and highway purposes.
Whereas, Minnesota's transportation infrastructure forms the backbone of the state's
economy and has a direct impact on future economic development;
Whereas, too many Minnesotans are being killed in traffic crashes on dangerous
roadways;
Whereas, funding for highway and transit systems in Minnesota has remained stagnant
and is failing to keep pace with growing population and growing demands;
Whereas, local governments throughout the state are struggling to maintain local
transportation systems while the state's gas tax has not been increased since 1988 and
transit budgets have been cut in recent years;
Whereas, the Minnesota Legislature has repeatedly turned to revenue from the motor
vehicle sales tax, which has been viewed as user fee revenue, in order to fund both
highway and transit systems including the current dedication of 54% of motor vehicle
sales tax for transportation purposes;
Whereas, the legislature passed a proposed constitutional amendment during the 2005
Legislative Session that would appear on the ballot November 7, 2006 asking voters if
the remaining 46% of motor vehicle sales tax revenue currently used for other purposes
should be used for highways and transit systems;
Whereas, passage of this amendment would mean an increase in stable revenue for
highway and transit systems throughout the state that would rise to approximately $300
million per year once the transfer of revenue is fully phased-in by 2011;
NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved That the City of Maplewood strongly supports
passage of the proposed amendment to the Minnesota Constitution dedicating all of the
motor vehicle sales tax revenue to transportation with at least 40% of the revenue for
public transit assistance and not more than 60% of the revenue for highway purposes.
Agenda Item 1.1
I N :4 :101 z;h 9& 1 111 k y , I i T I F-
Applicant: Josh Clendenen, Delaney Company LLC
Site Address: 2413 Linwood Avenue
Zoning: Single-Dwelling Residential (R-1)
Land Use: Single Dwelling Residential (R-1)
City Council Hearing Date: February 27, 2006
60-Day Review Date: March 26, 2006
Project Description: Josh Clendenen, Delaney Company LLC, is proposing to
construct a single-family house on a vacant lot at 2413 Linwood Avenue with a
30.5-foot front yard setback. City code would require a 68.2-foot front yard
setback on this lot.
Request: In order to construct the house with a 30.5-foot front yard setback as
proposed, Mr. Clendenen requests the city council approve a reduced front yard
setback of 37.7 feet.
Recommendation: City staff recommends approval of the reduced front yard
setback to allow a new house to be constructed at 2413 Linwood Avenue with a
30.5-foot front yard setback, instead of the required 68.2 feet.
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION
Richard Fursman, City Manager
Shann Finwall, AICP, Planner
Reduced Front Yard Setback
Josh Clendenen, Delaney Company LLC
2413 Linwood Avenue
February 21, 2006
Josh Clendenen, Delaney Company LLC, is requesting city approval of a reduced front
yard setback to construct a new single-family house at 2413 Linwood Avenue. The
single-family house is proposed with a setback which is closer to the Linwood Avenue
right-of-way than allowed by city code. (Refer to the attached location map, site plan,
and building elevations [Attachments 1 through 3].)
Request
In order to construct the house with a 30.5-foot front yard setback as proposed, Mr.
Clendenen requests the city council approve a reduced front yard setback authorization
of 37.7 feet.
XejX9jFRW
February 13, 1989: The city council approved a plat called Huntington Hills South, Third
Addition. A condition of approval was that a temporary cul-de-sac be constructed at the
end of Springside Drive, allowing for the future extension of the street. (Refer to the
Huntington Hills plat and the Springside Drive temporary cul-de-sac map attached
[Attachments 4 and 5].)
April 30, 2001: City staff approved the minor subdivision of 2437 Linwood Avenue in
order to create two single-family lots. One lot maintained the existing house on Linwood
Avenue and the second lot was developed with a single-family house with access off of
the Springside Drive temporary cul-de-sac (2439 Springside Drive). A condition of
approval was the dedication of a 60-foot-wide right-of-way easement for the future
extension of Springside Drive. (Refer to the 2437 Linwood Avenue minor subdivision
map attached [Attachment 6].)
August 23, 2004: The city council approved the preliminary plat for Hillside Estates.
This plat subdivided a 1.6-acre vacant lot on Linwood Avenue into three single-family
lots, with the extension of Springside Drive into the above-mentioned right-of-way
easement. Two lots front on the new Springside Drive cul-de-sac and one lot fronts on
Linwood Avenue (2413 Linwood). (Refer to the Hillside Estates preliminary plat attached
[Attachment 7].)
June 13, 2005: The city council approved the final plat for Hillside Estates. (Refer to the
Hillside Estates plat attached [Attachment 8].)
Single - Family House Setback Requirements
The city's single - family front yard setback ordinance (Section 44 -107) requires that each
dwelling and accessory structure have a front yard setback of at least 30 feet, except
that interior lots next to existing dwellings must maintain a minimum setback of the
adjacent dwelling closest to the street and a maximum setback of the adjacent dwelling
farthest from the street.
The vacant lot at 2413 Linwood Avenue is an interior lot. The adjacent house closest to
the street (2425 Linwood Avenue) is set back approximately 100 feet and the adjacent
house furthest from the street (2401 Linwood Avenue) is set back approximately 105
feet. According to the front yard setback ordinance, therefore, the minimum front yard
setback for the vacant lot at 2413 Linwood Avenue is 100 feet.
In this instance, however, the rear yard setback ordinance overrides the setback
required by the front yard setback ordinance. The rear yard setback ordinance (Section
44 -109) requires a minimum rear yard setback of 20 percent of the lot depth. The
vacant lot at 2413 Linwood Avenue is 139 feet deep. For comparison, the adjacent lots
to 2413 Linwood Avenue are approximately 191 and 268 feet deep. The required rear
yard setback for 2413 Linwood Avenue is 27.8 feet at a minimum (139 feet x .20 = 27.8
feet). For this reason, the furthest the house could be set back from the Linwood
Avenue right -of -way is 68.2 feet, rather than 100 feet as required by the front yard
setback ordinance (139 feet [lot depth] — 43 feet [house depth] — 27.8 [20 percent of lot
depth] = 682 feet).
Mr. Clendenen proposes his new house with a 30.5 -foot front yard setback rather than
the required 68.2 -foot front yard setback. The reduced front yard setback is being
requested in order to preserve a berm and mature oak trees.
The required side yard setbacks for a single family house are 10 feet for the living
structure portion of the house and 5 feet for an attached or detached garage. Mr.
Clendenen's house will comply with this requirement with an 11 -foot setback to the east
and a 66 -foot setback to the west.
Reduced Front Yard Setback Requirements
The front yard setback ordinance allows city staff to approve a different setback than
described above if it would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties
and if any of the following conditions apply:
1. The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of the homes.
2. The proposed setback would save significant natural features.
3. The proposed setback is necessary to meet city, state, or federal regulations,
such as the pipeline setback or noise regulation.
4. The proposed setback is necessary for energy - saving, health, or safety reasons.
2
AS directed by code, 0O September 8 staff informed the adjacent property
owners and the city council of the proposed different front yard setback. Fifteen days
were given in which k] receive comment orGnappeal. {}n September 20
staff received 8O appeal Of the proposed setback byGO adjacent property owner. The
code requires all appeals on different front yard setbacks to be heard by the city council
for final determination.
Mr. Fred N8zah8n the property owner located to the east of the vacant lot (2425
LiDvv00d Avenue), is appealing the reduced front yard setback. In K8[ N8z8h@O'S
attached appeal letter he discusses his concerns about the placement nf the house and
his COOC8[OS about the Ove[@|| platting of the property. (Refer to Fred N@z8ri8O'S appeal
letter attached [Attachment B].) |t would appear that Mr. N@z8riGO'S main concern iSwith
the placement Of the infiltration basin On the Linwood Avenue lot.
Mr. N8z@ri@D requests that the developer rHC0DbJU[ the infiltration basin 8S@ "crescent O[
flattened tear drop shape" in order to allow the placement of the house in the center of
the lot, rather than the east side Of the lot towards his house. With the house located
further to the west, Mr. Nazarian would then request that the house be set back as far
from the Linwood Avenue right-of-way as the city's ordinance allows, 68.2 feet. Mr.
N8z@h8OiS not supportive, however, Of the house maintaining @60.2-fO0t setback from
the Linwood Avenue right-of-way if the house maintains its proposed side yard setback
of 11 feet to the east property line. Mr. N@z@h@n is @vv@ne that this scenario would cause
the removal Df the berm and mature trees and therefore reduce his privacy.
Hillside Estates Plat
Location of Infiltration Basin
The Hillside Estates plat has a drainage and utility easement located on the west side of
the Linwood Avenue lot. One reason the easement is needed is for 8n infiltration basin
which iG designed t0 treat storm water runoff from the new SpriDg9idB Drive street
extension and the new lots. The location Of the basin OO the west side Of the lot and
north Cf Linwood Avenue was chosen due tO the grade of the land and the fact that there
are DO mature trees OO this side Of the lot. Any other location would have caused
additional grading and removal 0ftrees. The Sp[iOgSide Drive street extension and
infiltration basin was constructed last sUnnrn9r.
Erin Laberee, assistant city engineer, states that the relocation of the basin is possible.
However, it would require that the city council authorize the vacation of the existing
drainage and utility easement, that the developer redesign and reengineer the basin,
that the developer dedicate @ new drainage and utility easement tn the city, and that the
developer reQradethe entire basin with the possibility for the removal of mature trees.
Mr. Clendenen would be responsible for all costs and work associated with the basin
ne|OC@Uon.
Mr. Cl8Od8OeD states that the relocation Of the basin would be cost prohibitive. For this
reason he met with Mr. Nazarian to discuss alternatives such as planting several
evergreen trees along the east side Of the property b} create additional screening. W1[
N8z@h8O seems opposed UD any other alternative but the relocation Of the basin and
shifting of the house further t0 the west.
3
Mr. ClendHneD states that shifting the house further to the west while maintaining the
basin's CU[neDt k]C@tk}D i8 not feasible b8C8USG it would require retaining vv@||S on the
west side of the house. The retaining vv@||S vvOV|d need UJ be constructed within the
drainage and utility easement. Ms. L8b8r8e states that the construction Ofretaining
walls iDthe easement would be problematic iDthe event the city ever needed b}n3gr@de
the basin orconduct other drainage and utility work within the easement.
Building Pads
The approved Hillside Estates preliminary plat showed the |Oc@tiOO of proposed building
pads for the future houses. The purpose Of showing the building pads is tO ensure that
each lot can be developed according tV the grading and drainage plan.
The city's front yard setback ordinance described above states that the city council may
approve special setbacks for developments, which is the request by Mr. Clendenen.
The ordinance further states that approval of a preliminary plat with building pads does
not constitute approval Cf setbacks. |n this case, however, it does support the
applicant's request in that it showed the most probable location for the future houses.
Tree Replacement
A condition 0f the Hillside Estates plat approval was that the developer replace all large
trees removed with the development Vf each lot. The city's tree preservation ordinance
defines 8 large tree @S any healthy tree with @ trunk diameter 0f8 inches @t@4-fOot-
t[UOkheight.8xdUdiOgbOxe|dH[.00ttODvv00dS
determined by the community development director. There are four oak trees which will
be removed with the development Df the lot 8t2413 Linwood Avenue. Only two Ofthe
oaks are considered ^ '|arQa''trees. Therefore, Mr. Qendenen is required 0o replace at
least two trees. With the approval of reduced front yard setback, city staff
recommends the replacement 0f all four trees, regardless 0f their size.
In Sb3ff'G OpiDk0 the proposed |0C8tioD of the hOU38 meets the 9b3Od8ndG of approval as
specified in the city's front yard setback ordinance for a reduced front yard setback for
the following reasons:
1 The proposed location 0f the house will not affect the drainage Ofsurrounding
properties.
2. The proposed location Of the house will not affect the privacy Of adjacent houses
because it will be screened from view from the house V]the east by@ berm and
several mature trees, and will b8 located over 1yO feet away from the house k}
the west.
3. The proposed location Of the house will preserve several mature oak trees.
For these reasons, staff recommends approval of the requested reduced front yard
setback authorization on the condition that the developer plant four, 8-foot-high
evergreen trees along the east property line, behind the rear wall [f the house, tO
increase screening from the adjacent property.
4
I.NW
Approve Josh Clendenen's request for a reduced front yard setback to allow a new
house to be constructed at 2413 Linwood Avenue with a 30.5 foot front yard setback,
instead of the required 68.2 feet. Approval is based on the following findings:
The lot has many difficult development challenges including: the lot is at least 52
feet shorter in length than the adjacent lot, there is a large infiltration basin and
drainage and utility easement located on the west half of the lot, there is a large
berm located on the northeast corner of the lot, and there are several mature oak
trees located on the northeast corner of the lot.
2. The Hillside Estates preliminary plat reflects the best location for a building pad
on the lot to be located with an approximate 30 -foot front yard setback on the
east side of the lot, as proposed by the applicant.
3. There are mature trees located on the northeast corner of the lot that will help
screen the new house from the house to the east.
4. The new house will be located over 170 feet from the house to the west.
Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following:
The applicant must submit the following for staff approval prior to issuance of a
building permit:
a. Landscape plan showing the location of four, 8 -foot -high evergreen trees
to be located along the east lot line, behind the rear wall of the house, to
add screening from the new house to the house located to the northeast
(2425 Linwood Avenue).
b. A letter of credit or cash escrow to cover 150 percent of the cost of
planting the above - mentioned four, 8 -foot -high evergreen trees.
2. Prior to certificate of occupancy for the house, the applicants must install all
required landscaping, including the four, 8- foot -high evergreen trees, and pave
the driveway with a bituminous surface.
P:com- dev \12 -28 \Springside Drive\2413 Linwood Avenue
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Elevations
4. Huntington Hills Plat
5. Springside Drive Temporary Cul -De -Sac Map
6. 2437 Linwood Avenue Minor Subdivision Map
7. Hillside Estates Preliminary Plat
8. Hillside Estates Final Plat
9. Appeal Letter
N
Attachment 2
LINWO-0-0 A VENL
E;lw 14
IO23S1 ,,
MIMM
0
1009.96
�
T_
i r\ovj
71?1 a
LI/I Tc�,
E l evation s
F
Elevations
Attachment 4
HUNTINGTON HILLS SOUTH THIRD ADDITION
S 'non-E S 7
21.73
247A2
dik ---- — -----
so a •
SCALA Fm 9
BEARING NOTE; POND "r- %�
#0
' I
4 5
IN t 11
w. ..+.. ' Z' I I N
am—
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS Ao!
ARE SHOWN THUS: .0
`14
nt
6
41
P N
Eew 1/4 K 114 L_ 30 � 30
.98
24&70 S 83
wo mill!
VV M34
scuow m rip. a Am
tmmwx tm'm DST
MCI IL M. 2a "Com 9= 3Y 01= swl" tvq!X 11-S. IP
lz r► � 24 MAIK ?4r = =
w
SCUM 1/4 COVCt OF SEC It
kmft om 22 It=
CIUMIER LAND ffURVEYOZ& VII
IMMMZO f'%OPZ=OXAL 0 UAMV SUI&VEYORS
lamb,
�I�
N Huntir Hillb Plat
W E 8
s
Attachment 5
YMY
q bF
MOO J/ 69..1€t 1 40 .
f- - - - -.. - - - - - I I r
6 50'-4"PE DRAIN TILE
I I I ( I. I ! ! r
�--J L ------
PIE MNINTILE..-
ti a4
JOT,
1 4
ro
I 7 I r
t t w v
NV = 006.96
Kw. = 1010.0
N Springsi•e Dri've
Teln' Cul-de-Sac
s
INFO q. CURVE
o
N.W. = 100707
H,W. = OM40
R 1',S Joam'
PC,= 1417.63 1
CONSTRUCT TE RARY
PT� Z+IM3
%
TURN-ARO D 100 DIA.
' CENTER I
13" CL,
3
L - 2� - 233r - wE F
125.00 34,38
YMY
q bF
MOO J/ 69..1€t 1 40 .
f- - - - -.. - - - - - I I r
6 50'-4"PE DRAIN TILE
I I I ( I. I ! ! r
�--J L ------
PIE MNINTILE..-
ti a4
JOT,
1 4
ro
I 7 I r
t t w v
NV = 006.96
Kw. = 1010.0
N Springsi•e Dri've
Teln' Cul-de-Sac
s
N 53'34'06 E
x
OR" xtna x
to
0,
rol
—PROPOSM DMW a.
t as
NM
0 4 WiVEWAX EASEUENT
— — — — — — — — — — — --
$46�0
------------------------- ------------------- --- —
4�
iIDRJ)t Wit: OF MEET Wi;tjT—QF—WAY
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
WIE Or ttiE SE 114—SW T/4
SEC 17 T. 2B. R. 22 fj
IVIFOO,O A VA' E.
—' IV
88*34'06 E Mrr, 'w,
Attachment 6
2437 Linwood Ave,
Minor Subdiv*isnion
1783'L�
1 1 42' R
170' 10' U71UTY EASEMENT
46',
17�
UNWOOD A7VE.
Attachment 7
SEtnON 12 TOWN 28 RANCE 72 SUBJ To RI)
EX W 60 FT OF E 206 PT OF 5225 Ft & EX E
146 FT; THE S 500 FT OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF
S- 1/4 OF SW 1/4 iN SEC 12 TN 28 ;?N 22
SPRfNGSiDE DR.
8
Prel il" nary
%I.
r2
R
-----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Attachment 8
FOUND 1/2 INCH
to [RON PPE~ CAP
n NO. 9235
0
).00
V)
.3'07'49'
4.90
C
16
— — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — —
—
Z as �
It
IT
00 < 11
LO (per right—of—way for roadway
i'15'37 K �
I'SO
purpas�es. Doc- No. 1645294)
Cobb
----------------
LO
C
00
`07'
.90
----------
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — --
388'34'06"WI
Co
a
40.01
S88'34'06"W 206.04
&I M r 0 t
Am
Final Plat
R E C E'i "! IF '__ a
SEP : 0 200
TO: City of Maplewood — Office of Community Development
1830 County Road B East Attachment 9
Maplewood, MN 55109
FROM: Fred Nazarian
2425 Linwood Avenue East
Maplewood, MN 55119
DATE: 15 September 2005
SUBJECT: John Poirer Development and resultant lot on XXXX Linwood Avenue East.
I have received your letter for comment on the proposed house placement by Delaney Custom Homes on
24XX Linwood Avenue East (immediately West of my property). Before I make my comments and
suggestions I feel it is mandated that we do a review of the plat as initially proposed by John Poirer (See
Attachment 1).
BACKGROUND:
In reviewing this proposed plat I made some suggested changes to it. One of these proposed changes was
to allow the 1.7 acres to be developed as ONLY TWO LOTS. I also expressed my concerns as to my loss
of privacy if too many trees were cut down to make room for the (then proposed) cul-de-sac. With
hindsight I now see that these suggestions were not listened to and a PROBLEM has been created for the
developer (Delaney Custom Homes) by the allowance of the third lot, and the placement of a MUD
POND (settlement ditch) in a position on the lot that almost certainly forces the ungainly placement of the
proposed new house in one of two areas immediately close to my property line and causes the cutting of
more trees in order to have this placement work. Also, if allowed, it will certainly destroy EVEN MORE
of my privacy (as did the removal of 80% of the trees in the right-of-way of, and immediately adjacent to
(on the South side of) the cul-de-sac)). Additionally, there were two other configurations of the mud pond
prior to this last iteration.
ACTIONS:
The City approved the (proposed) plat by John Poirer for three lots after (as I understand it) he requested
development of only one house on the property (and he was forced by the City to develop three lots).
Additionally after staking out the three lots with lath, these lath sticks were constantly being moved by
surveyors during the one-year of development of this property. Additionally there STILL IS an
unresolved concern about the East line of the 24XX lot and it true location (again lath placements were
moved by surveyors AND A METAL LOT IRON was also moved within the last six weeks. I brought
these concerns up to the developer and Shann Finwall but have seen no action as agreed to in our meeting
of 9:00 AM Thursday, 9 September 2005.
MY POSITION:
I am formally objecting to the placement of the house in its' currently staked out location near the East
property line of the property. Additionally, I object to the present contour and placement of the mud pond
on the lot at 24XX Linwood Avenue East.
PROPOSED ACTIONS:
In counter to this location I propose the following actions by the City of Maplewood:
1) Recontour the settlement pond closer to the West property line and in a crescent or flattened
tear drop shape (See Attachment 2 proposed re- designs and house placement),
2) Allowance of the placement of the proposed new house in a location more in the middle of the
lot and closer to the back of the lot,
3) Replace all of the "Large trees" removed for the cul -de -sac work according to the "Large tree
Ordnance" of the City of Maplewood. I suggest the planting of the replacements on the South
side of the cul -de -sac between the remaining trees and the East lot line of the new Springside
Lot#2. - ¢Ee AAACHMtmr * t •.
4) Replacement of some trees removed from the 24XX Linwood lot on the side of the boundary
Hill between 24XX and 2425 Linwood Avenue East (subject to agreement between developer
and Homeowner of 2425 Linwood Avenue East),
5) A setback for he house of 66 feet from the front lot line, and a minimum of 15 feet from the
East lot line of 24XX Linwood Avenue East, based upon the recontouring of the mud pond
into a more compact shape closer to the South and West lot lines of 24 XX Linwood ( two
proposed re- configurations can be seen on Attachment 2).
If the City approves the placement of the house in its' currently staked out position (near the East lot line)
and 30.5 feet for a front yard set -back, then I am formally requesting a Ietter from Mr. Patrick Kelly
accepting full fiscal responsibility for all future depreciation of value of my house. Such value to be
determined by the historical (appraised and taxed) value increases from 1997 to date. Furthermore, I wish
to be compensated on an annual basis for all loss of value due to the failure to allow placement of this
house in a more aesthetically pleasing (and normalized) location.
Sincerely,
Fred Nazarian
2425 Linwood Avenue East
Maplewood, MN 55119 — 5824
Dc: Delaney Custom Homes
Mayor Bill Cardinal
A rrAc."mev I
S c" 12 Imm 2s ��M = suw TO ;w
Ex w fio n Of E =A OF S= F7 & a
!46 Ft; INE S 500 FT OF E 1/2 OF V 1/2 OF
T 1 / 4 OF SW Y W = 1 2 IN 20 R14 22
iL
LINWOOD �-VE.
ArAoimc-N - r
lvoz ,T a.q
�2'v
00 AME
NUE
W
OAX 1
M $19
0
Agenda Item J1
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Parks and Recreation Director
DATE: February 22.2OO5 for the February 27 City Council Meeting
SUBJECT: MCC Pool Ceiling Painting
INTRODUCTION
The Maplewood Community Center opened to the public in October 1994. The facility has proven to
be extremely successful and we've had the opportunity to serve over 4 million patrons during the past
decade.
The city has made extraordinary efforts to keep the community center iDexcellent condition and we
regularly receive compliments regarding the quality and upkeep of the community center. As the
community center begins hoshow its age, ongoing maintenance issues continue ho evolve. The MCC
pool ceiling and support beams are currently iD need 0f painting. The formal bid proposals were
opened on Wednesday, February 22 at 9 a.m. in the city hall council chambers.
The MCC pool and support beams are currently in need of maintenance and routine painting and
upkeep. Specifications and advertisement for bid were prepared and advertised iO the local
newspaper.
There were three bids received ranging from g low Of$08.315[Og high of $155,600.
The request for proposal proposed the painting of the interior of the Maplewood Community Center
8qU8UC C8OLe[ as outlined in the 8OC|0S8d 13-point 3p8CifiC@ti003 which were supported by d8L8i|Gd
paint and product application specifications from Sherwin Williams.
It is proposed that the painting will occur during the pool shutdown at the end of August. The monies
for the painting will come from the Maplewood Community Center capital improvement fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the city council award the low bid of $96,315 to Swanson & Youmdale|nc,
with the understanding that the city receive 8 formal letter [f confirmation warranting their bid through
December 1, 2006.
xp»\bidawerd.poo/nco
Enclosure
MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER
PREPARATION AND PAINTING AQUATIC PROJECT
BID OPENING
February 22, 2006
9 a.m.
BIDDER
BID AMOUNT
BID ALTERNATE 1
BID ALTERNATE 2
5% BID BOND
Swanson & Youngdale Inc
$96,315
Yes
Rainbow Inc.
$98,930
Yes
TMI Coatings
$155,600
Yes
Swanson & Youngdale, Inc.
6565 West 23rd Street
P.D. Box 26070
Mirnea.pohs, Miinesuta 55426-0070
Phone: 952 54-5,2541
F;ix: 952 45.4435
Saks Fax: 592.525.1945
Mr. Larry Farr
City of Maplewood
Maplewood Community Center
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 66109
Re: Maplewood Community Center — Pool Ceiling Painting
Maplewood, Minnesota
We propose to furnish labor, materials and equipment to provide the preparation and
painting of the pool ceiling at the above referenced, per the specifications dated December
9, 2005, for the such of $96,315.00.
We further propose to issue a credit of $2,500.00 it the main tresses are painted to match
the ceiling color.
This proposal is based on no lead, radium, chromium or other hazardous materials are in
the existing coatings.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me,
An Equal Opportunity Employer/Contractor
a:» ■■.<£ : <»
m■fewa
LOC%20y MAPS WOOD COMMUNITY CENTER POOL
!
ITEM DESCRIPTI � U/M QMANTITY PRICE EXTENSIO
FUR N I SH ALL LAB 7 AND MATERIA FOR THE
PREPARATION ND PA MAP LEWOOD
COMMUNITY CENTE AQUATIC CEILING S
BEAMS AND R ELATED ft N L
(AS PER TT HED SPECI F I CAT I ON)
4 ■■ i<, ■, 4!■ + a „
&!! «, „
1H
PROPOSAL
TMI Coatings, Inc.
MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER AQUATIC CEILING PAINTING
Bids Due: 9:00 A,M, February 22, 2006
TMI Coatings proposes; to furnish all labor and materials for the preparation and painting of the Maplewood
Community Center aquatic ceiling and support beams and related painting projects in accordance with 12-page bid
spec i
if cati dated January 26, 1 -006.
'FOTALLA-BORA-�ND.\IATERL LED : . . . ... . . , . , , . , $155
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to you. If you have any questions or comments, please feel
free to contact me at 65 1- X152 -61
<:(m'oro
5
February 13, 2006
City of Maplewood
Maplewood Community Center (MCC)
2100 White Bear Ave.
Maplewood, Mn. 55109
This RFP is intended for the painting of the interior of the Maplewood Community
Center Aquatic Area. This includes the following items and is not limited to unforeseen
details or exclusion.
1. Protection of Pool Area so that debris does not contaminate the pool area or pool
waters. Empty Pools and decks are to be lined with plastic, taped at seams and
secured on the decks.
2. Prep work/cleaning to remove loose paint, rust, and debris on items to be done
using approved method.
3. Prep work/cleaning of all metal ceiling decking to remove loose paint, rust, and
debris (using approved method not to damage or remove galvanized finish)
4. Prep work/cleaning of all trusses, support columns, and girders/1 -Beams to
remove loose paint, rust, and debris (using approved method)
5. Prep work/cleaning of all attaching plates, Pipes, support brackets, trim, bolts,
and related support items to remove loose paint, rust, and debris (sandblasting
may be required)
6. Prep work/cleaning of all Light Fixtures to remove loose paint, rust, and debris
(sandblasting may be required)
7. Priming using Sherwin Williams recommended primer and methods for the areas
listed above, pickling may be necessary on galvanized decking areas.
8. Paint all areas using Sherwin - Williams recommended paint (color to be selected
by MCC) for the areas listed above following Sherwin - Williams requirements.
9. Disposal of all debris following EPA or other regulatory agencies specifications.
10. Warranty to be issued by Sherwin - Williams for areas completed.
11. Independent inspector will be contracted to do inspection to insure quality of
work and application of finishes throughout project.
12. All items /materials required for this project will be inclusive in this proposal
including but not limited to primer, paint, cleaning supplies, cleaners, sand
blaster /sand /materials, lift equipment, scaffolding, ventilation, safety equipment,
protective equipment, permits if required, coverings, tape, clean -up, window
cleaning, disposal of debris, and related project items.
13. This bid also includes steel wind break columns by windows, water slide support
frame, and fire sprinkler system.
(NOTE: This proposal does not include the waterslide stairs /railings /deck areas, cement
support columns, walls, or metal doors /windows trim.)
Bids are due by February 22, 2006.
If you have any questions or need different blue prints please contact Larry Farr, Chief
Building Engineer at 651 -249 -2342, or Cell Phone 651- 755 -3098.
My computer/Maplewood Community CenteriPool Area RFP Painting 2005A
9
Agenda Item K1
TO: Richard FurSmaO. City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer
SUBJECT: TH 5 and TH 120 Vacant MnDOT Property, City Project 03-20—
Resolution Calling for Public Hearing on March 13 to Review Marsh 212
and Hill_MurrayConcept Plans
DATE: February 20,2006
The excess right of way on the western side of TH 120 at the intersection with TH 5 has been under
discussion for six years regarding the possibility of relocating the |S[] #022 bus maintenance facility from
U0vvntOvvn North St. Paul tO this site. In the past year, Hill-Murray School has also expressed on interest in
the property for expansion 0f their campus and athletic fields. An environmental group, represented bv
Ron CoCkpei| (called Marsh 212),has also expressed interest/concern with site proposals. |n July 2OU5
each of these groups made a presentation to the City Council on their proposal. {)n January 23,2OO8,the
City Council heard G presentation from |8[)#822On the bus garage proposal. A public hearing would b8
appropriate tO receive local input OD the Marsh 212 and Hill-Murray Concept Plans. A resolution calling
that hearing for March 13. 2000, is recommended.
Background
The City Council considered this item Vn January 23.2O08, when the bus garage proposal was presented.
The Council requested 8 presentation from Marsh 212 and Hill-Murray before making 8final
determination. ApUb|iC hearing should be called for March 13, 2008 L8 review these pnJp8s8|S. Marsh
212 and Hill-Murray are expected to submit information for the public hearing On March 3 m for staff review.
A formal review and discussion of the property will be presented as part of the staff report for the public
hearing once information from Marsh 212 and Hill-Murray iGreceived.
Staff plans to review the two proposals with the same criteria for wetland protection, environmental
enhancement, wetland restoration and overall neighborhood impact as applied to the bus garage proposal,
which was recommended for denial by the staff.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution calling a public hearing for March 13,
2006, at 7:00 pm on the TH 5 and TH 120 excess MnIDOT property for Marsh 212 and Hill-Murray.
Attachments:
Agenda Item K1
RESOLUTION
CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has previously reviewed a proposal from
Independent School District No. 622 for relocation of their bus garage facility from North St. Paul
to vacant MnDOT property at the intersection of TH 5 and TH 120 (Century Avenue), and
WHEREAS, the Council requested a review of alternative proposals from a group called
Marsh 212 and also from Hill-Murray School, and
WHEREAS, said proposals require extensive public review and comment, and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to hear all relative comment on the proposal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider presentations by representatives from Marsh 212 and
representations from Hill-Murray School for the MnDOT property at TH 5 and TH 120.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed proposals on the 13th day of March
2006, in the council chambers of city hall at 7:00 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and
published notice of such hearing and improvement as required.
Item L -1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: February 21, 2006
RE: Change of Manager Intoxicating Liquor License
Introduction
Blianchong Lor has submitted an application for a change of manager for the on -sale
intoxicating liquor license for Lor's Liquor Store, located at 1347 Frost Avenue. Mr. Lor
was an equal partner with Charlie Lor and is now sole owner. Mr. Lor has been
employed at the store since 2003.
Background
Mr. Lor has been residing at his current St. Paul address for the past three years. Prior to
moving to St. Paul he resided in Minneapolis for ten years. One of Mr. Lor's business
references indicated that he has known Mr. Lor both professionally and personally for
approximately six years and he is a "really nice person." Another stated that Mr. Lor has
no problems with his business practices.
Chief Thomalla has personally met with Mr. Lor to discuss measures to eliminate the sale
of alcohol to underage persons, general security and retail crime issues, and the
Maplewood Liquor Ordinances. In the course of this investigation, state criminal history
files were checked along with contacts and warrants in the cities of St. Paul, Minneapolis
and Maplewood. Ramsey and Hennepin counties were also checked.
Recommendation
The on -sale intoxicating liquor license change of manager is submitted to Council for
approval.
Item L -2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: February 21, 2006
RE: Change of Manager Intoxicating Liquor License
Introduction
Jill Skogheim has submitted an application for a change of manager for the on -sale
intoxicating liquor license for 5 -8 Tavern & Grill, located at 2289 Minnehaha Avenue.
Background
Ms. Skogheim was born and raised in the West St. Paul area and has been residing in the
Dakota County cities of Inver Grove Heights and Mendota Heights for the past five
years.
Ms. Skogheim is also a shareholder in the business and the owner of the building. She
also has been affiliated with 5 -8 Tavern & Grill in Minneapolis since 1997 and the
Maplewood location since 2002 where she is the current manager.
One of Ms. Skogheim's references made very positive comments about her. In fact, he
said that she is "very straight laced" and "a very trustworthy person."
Chief Thomalla met with Ms. Skogheim to discuss measures to eliminate the sale of
alcohol to underage persons, general security and retail crime issues, and the Maplewood
Liquor Ordinances. In the course of this investigation, state criminal history files were
checked along with contacts and warrants in the City of St. Paul, City of Inver Grove
Heights and Ramsey, Hennepin and Dakota Counties.
Recommendation
The on -sale intoxicating liquor license change of manager is submitted to Council for
approval.
Agenda Item L.3
TO: City Manager
FROM: Kevin Christiansen, Planning Intern
SUBJECT: Nonconforming Use Ordinance Amendment
DATE: February 21
On May 29.3004.Governor Ti0PawlSnty approved amendments to the state's nonconforming
statute. The 8Dl8Od[Derd authorizes further restriction tOvv8nd repairing and replacing
nonconforming uses. The amended statute takes precedence over the city's current
DODC0Df0rDiDg 0ndiD@OC8. To be consistent with the standards in the state St@tULe staff is
proposing @O amendment t0 the city's nonconforming use ordinance.
DISCUSSION
The city's zoning code, Article 1, Section 44-12 (c) states that a "nonconforming use that is
wholly or partially destroyed by fire, explosion, flood or other phenomenon or legally condemned
may be reconstructed and used for the same nonconforming use provided that building
reconstruction shall be commenced within one year from the date the building was destroyed or
condemned and shall b8 carried on without interrVption." However, Minnesota Statutes, Section
462.357, subdivision 1 (e) states that any nonconforming use may continue after destruction
unless more than 5O%Of the market value was destroyed and DObuilding permit has been
applied for within 18O days from the date Of the destruction.
Changing the city's nonconforming use ordinance to disallow a nonconforming use if 5Oq60fthe
market value has been lost and to mandate owners of nonconforming uses to apply for a
building permit within 180 days will be consistent with state statute.
On February 6, 2006, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed
nonconforming use code amendment (Section 42-12).
Approve the proposed ordinance amendment attached. This code amendment changes the
nonconforming ordinance (Section 42'12) k]make it consistent with Minnesota Statute, Section
462.357, subdivision 1(e).
Attachments:
1. Maplewood's current Nonconforming Ordinance
2. Minnesota Statutes 20O5 section 402.357. subdivision 1(e)
3. Proposed Ordinance Amendment
JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 624 SESS. 2 OUTPUT: Tue Apr 8 12:31:10 2003
/firsUpubdoes/mcc/3/11217–full Attachment 1
§ 44-11 MAPLEWOOD CODE
(3) Whenever an OL district is established, any subsequent application to change the
district with which the OL district is combined shall not be construed to be an
application to eliminate the OL district for the area covered by the application, unless
such intent is expressly stated in the application.
(4) Establishment of and any subsequent modification of the boundaries of any OL district
shall be by ordinance amending the zoning map of the city. Such amendment shall
comply with the requirements of article VII of this chapter.
(c) District regulations. In any OL district parcel criteria, property development and use
regulations may be established in accordance with the objectives identified in the district's
individual purpose and intent. Such regulations shall be structured to implement the purpose
and intent of the individual district and shall be applied uniformly to all properties within the
district.
(Code 1982, §§ 36-14-36-16)
Sec. 44-12. Nonconforming buildings or uses.
(a) Any 1 1 awful use of a building or land existing at the effective date of any section of this
chapter may be continued although such use does not conform to such section of this chapter.
(b) The substitution of one nonconforming use for another nonconforming use may be
permitted by the city council by conditional use permit, as provided in article V of this chapter,
provided that such nonconforming use is determined by the city council to be of the same or
more restrictive nature as the original nonconforming use. Whenever a nonconforming use of
a building or land has been changed to a use of a more restrictive classification or to a
conforming use, such use shall not thereafter be changed to a use of a less restricted
classification.
(c) A nonconforming building wholly or partially destroyed by fire, explosion, flood or other
phenomenon or legally condemned may be reconstructed and used for the same nonconforming
use, provided that building reconstruction shall be commenced within one year from the date
the building was destroyed or condemned and shall be carried on without interruption.
(d) If a nonconforming use of a building or land is voluntarily abandoned and ceases for a
continuous period of one year or more, subsequent use of such building or land shall be in
conformity with this chapter.
(e) No existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the district in which
such building or premises is located shall be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered,
unless:
(1) Required by law or government order; or
(2) There would not be a significant effect, as determined by the city through a conditional
use permit, on the development of the parcel as zoned.
CD44:22
Minnesota Statutes 2005, 462.357 Page I of 6
Attachment 2
Minnesota Statutes 2005. Table oLChapters
Table of contents for Cha - ter 462
462,357 Official controls: zoning ordinance.
Subdivision 1. Authority for zoning. For the purpose
of promoting the public health, safety, morals, and general
welfare, a municipality may by ordinance regulate on the earth's
surface, in the air space above the surface, and in subsurface
areas, the location, height, width, bulk, type of foundation,
number of stories, size of buildings and other structures, the
percentage of lot which may be occupied, the size of yards and
other open spaces, the density and distribution of population,
the uses of buildings and structures for trade, industry,
residence, recreation, public activities, or other purposes, and
the uses of land for trade, industry, residence, recreation,
agriculture, forestry, soil conservation, water supply
conservation, conservation of shorelands, as defined in sections
103F.201 to 103F.221, access to direct sunlight for solar energy
systems as defined in section 2160.06, flood control or other
purposes, and may establish standards and procedures regulating
such uses. To accomplish these purposes, official controls may
include provision for purchase of development rights by the
governing body in the form of conservation easements under
chapter B4C in areas where the governing body considers
preservation desirable and the transfer of development rights
from those areas to areas the governing body considers more
appropriate for development. No regulation may prohibit earth
sheltered construction as defined in section 2160.06,
subdivision 14, relocated residential buildings, or manufactured
homes built in conformance with sections 327.31 to 327.35 that
comply with all other zoning ordinances promulgated pursuant to
this section. The regulations may divide the surface, above
surface, and subsurface areas of the municipality into districts
or zones of suitable numbers, shape, and area. The regulations
shall be uniform for each class or kind of buildings,
structures, or land and for each class or kind of use throughout
such district, but the regulations in one district may differ
from those in other districts. The ordinance embodying these
regulations shall be known as the zoning ordinance and shall
consist of text and maps. A city may by ordinance extend the
application of its zoning regulations to unincorporated
territory located within two miles of its limits in any
direction, but not in a county or town which has adopted zoning
regulations; provided that where two or more noncontiguous
municipalit have boundaries less than four miles apart, each
is authorized to control the zoning of land on its side of a
line equidistant between the two noncontiguous municipalities
unless a town or county in the affected area has adopted zoning
regulations. Any city may thereafter enforce such regulations
in the area to the same extent as if such property were situated
within its corporate limits, until the county or town board
adopts a comprehensive zoning regulation which includes the area.
Subd. !a. Certain zoning ordinances. A municipality
must not enact, amend, or enforce a zoning ordinance that has
the effect of altering the existing density, lot -size
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/462/357,htm] 1/17/2006
Minnesota Statutes 2005, 462.357
requirements, or manufactured home setback requirements in any
manufactured home park constructed before January 1, 1995, if
the manufactured home park, when constructed, complied with the
then existing density, lot-size and setback requirements.
Subd. lb. Conditional uses. A manufactured home
park, as defined in section 327.14, subdivision 3, is a
conditional use in a zoning district that allows the
construction or placement of a building used or intended to be
used by two or more families.
Subd. 1c. Amortization prohibited. Except as
otherwise provided in this subdivision, a municipality must not
enact, amend, or enforce an ordinance providing for the
elimination or termination of a use by amortization which use
was lawful at the time of its inception. This subdivision does
not apply to adults-only bookstores, adults-only theaters, or
similar adults-only businesses, as defined by ordinance.
Subd. ld. Nuisance. Subdivision lc does not prohibit
a municipality from enforcing an ordinance providing for the
prevention or abatement of nuisances, as defined in section
561,01, or eliminating a use determined to be a public nuisance,
as defined in section 617.81,, subdivision 2, paragraph (a),
clauses (1) to (9), without payment of compensation.
Subd. le. Nonconformities. (a) Any nonconformity,
including the lawful use or occupation of land or premises
existing at the time of the adoption of an additional control
under this chapter, may be continued, including through repair,
replacement, restoration, maintenance, or improvement, but not
including expansion, unless:
(1) the nonconformity or occupancy is discontinued for a
period of more than one year; or
(2) any nonconforming use is destroyed by fire or other
peril to the extent of greater than 50 percent of its market
• value, and no building permit has been applied for within 180
• days of when the property is damaged. In this case, a
municipality may impose reasonable conditions upon a building
permit in order to mitigate any newly created impact on adjacent
property.
(b) Any subsequent use or occupancy of the land or premises
shall be a conforming use or occupancy. A municipality may, by
ordinance, permit an expansion or impose upon nonconformities
reasonable regulations to prevent and abate nuisances and to
protect the public health, welfare, or safety. This subdivision
does not prohibit a municipality from enforcing an ordinance
that applies to adults-only bookstores, adults-only theaters, or
similar adults-only businesses, as defined by ordinance.
(c) notwithstanding paragraph (a), a municipality shall
regulate the repair, replacement, maintenance, improvement, or
expansion of nonconforming uses and structures in floodplain
areas to the extent necessary to maintain eligibility in the
National Flood Insurance Program and not increase flood damage
potential or increase the degree of obstruction to flood flows
in the floodway.
Page 2 of 6
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/462/357.btml 1/17/2006
Minnesota Statutes 2005, 462.357
Subd. if. Substandard structures. Notwithstanding
subdivision le, Minnesota Rules, parts 6105.0351 to 6105-0550,
may allow for the continuation and - improvement of substandard
structures, as defined in Minnesota Rules, part 6105.0354,
subpart 30, in the Lower Saint Croix National Scenic Riverway.
Subd. lg. Feedlot zoning controls. (a) A
municipality proposing to adopt a new feedlot zoning control or
to amend an existing feedlot zoning control must notify the
Pollution Control Agency and commissioner of agriculture at the
beginning of the process, no later than the date notice is given
of the first hearing proposing to adopt or amend a zoning
control purporting to address feedlots.
(b) Prior to final approval of a -feedlot zoning control,
the governing body of a municipality may submit a copy of the
proposed zoning control to the Pollution Control Agency and to
the commissioner of agriculture and request review, comment, and
recommendations on the environmental and agricultural effects
from specific provisions in the ordinance.
(c) The agencies' response to the municipality may include;
and
(1) any recommendations for improvements in the ordinance;
(2) the legal, social, economic, or scientific
justification for each recommendation under clause (1).
(d) At the request of the municipality's governing body,
the municipality must prepare a report on the economic effects
from specific provisions in the ordinance. Economic analysis
must state whether the ordinance will affect the local economy
and describe the kinds of businesses affected and the projected
impact the proposal will have on those businesses. To assist
the municipality, the commissioner of agriculture, in
cooperation with the Department of Employment and Economic
Development, must develop a template for measuring local
economic effects and make it available to the municipality. The
report must be submitted to the commissioners of employment and
economic development and agriculture along with the proposed
ordinance.
(e) A local ordinance that contains a setback for new
feedlots from existing residences must also provide for a new
residence setback from existing -feedlots located in areas zoned
agricultural at the same distances and conditions specified in
the setback for new feedlots, unless the new residence is built
to replace an existing residence. A municipality may grant a
variance from this requirement under section 462.358,
subdivision 6.
Subd. 2. General requirements. (a) At any time after
the adoption of a land use plan -for the municipality, the
planning agency, for the purpose of carrying out the policies
and goals of the land use plan, may prepare a proposed zoning
ordinance and submit it to the governing body with its
recommendations for adoption.
Page 3 of 6
http://w 1/17/2006
Minnesota Statutes 2005, 4623 :)57
(b) Subject to the requirements of subdivisions 3, 4, and
5, the governing body may adopt and amend a zoning ordinance by
a majority vote of all its members. The adoption or amendment
of any portion of a zoning ordinance which changes all or part
of the existing classification of a zoning district from
residential to either commercial or industrial requires a
two-thirds majority vote of all members of the governing body.
(c) The land use plan must provide guidelines for the
timing and sequence of the adoption of official controls to
ensure planned, orderly, and staged development and
redevelopment consistent with the land use plan.
Subd. 3. Public hearings. No zoning ordinance or
amendment thereto shall be adopted until a public hearing has
been held thereon by the planning agency or by the governing
body. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing
shall be published in the official newspaper of the municipality
at least ten days prior to the day of the hearing. When an
amendment involves changes in district boundaries affecting an
area of five acres or less, a similar notice shall be mailed at
least ten days before the day of the hearing to each owner of
affected property and property situated wholly or partly within
350 feet of the property to which the amendment relates. For
the purpose of giving mailed notice, the person responsible for
mailing the notice may use any appropriate records to determine
the names and addresses of owners. A copy of the notice and a
list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent
shall be attested to by the responsible person and shall be made
a part of the records of the proceedings. The failure to give
mailed notice to individual property owners, or defects in the
notice shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona
fide attempt to comply with this subdivision has been made.
Subd. 4. Amendments. An amendment to a zoning
ordinance may be initiated by the governing body, the planning
agency, or by petition of affected property owners as defined in
the zoning ordinance. An amendment not initiated by the
planning agency shall be referred to the planning agency, if
there is one, for study and report and may not be acted upon by
the governing body until it has received the recommendation of
the planning agency on the proposed amendment or until 60 days
have elapsed from the date of reference of the amendment without
a report by the planning agency.
Subd. 5. Amendment; certain cities of the first class.
The provisions of this subdivision apply to the adoption or
amendment of any portion of a zoning ordinance which changes all
or part of the existing classification of a zoning district from
residential to either commercial or industrial of a property
located in a city of the first class, except a city of the first
class in which a different process is provided through the
operation of the city's home rule charter. In a city to which
this subdivision applies, amendments to a zoning ordinance shall
be made in conformance with this section but only after "here
shall have been filed in the office of the city clerk a written
consent of the owners of two-thirds of the several descriptions
of real estate situate within 100 feet of the total contiguous
descriptions of real estate held by the same owner or any party
purchasing any such contiguous property within one year
Page 4 of 6
http://iAq , w.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/462/357.htmi 1/17/2006
Minnesota Statutes 2005, 462,357
preceding the request, and after the affirmative vote in favor
thereof by a majority of the members of the governing body of
any such city. The governing body of such city may, by a
two-thirds vote of its members, after hearing, adopt a new
zoning ordinance without such written consent whenever the
planning commission or planning board of such city shall have
made a survey of the whole area of the city or of an area of not
less than 40 acres, within which the new ordinance or the
amendments or alterations of the existing ordinance would take
effect when adopted, and shall have considered whether the
number of descriptions of real estate affected by such changes
and alterations renders the obtaining of such written consent
impractical, and such planning commission or planning board
shall report in writing as to whether in its opinion the
proposals of the governing body in any case are reasonably
related to the overall needs of the community, to existing land
use, or to a plan for future land use, and shall have conducted
a public hearing on such proposed ordinance, changes or
alterations, of which hearing published notice shall have been
given in a daily newspaper of general circulation at least once
each week for three successive weeks prior to such hearing,
which notice shall state the time, place and purpose of such
hearing, and shall have reported to the governing body of the
city its findings and recommendations in writing.
Subd. 6. Appeals and adjustments. Appeals to the
board of appeals and adjustments may be taken by any affected
person upon compliance with any reasonable conditions imposed by
the zoning ordinance. The board of appeals and adjustments has
the following powers with respect to the zoning ordinance:
(1) To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that
there is an error in any order, requirement, decision, or
determination made by an administrative officer in the
enforcement of the zoning ordinance.
(2) To hear requests for variances from the literal
provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict
enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the individual property under consideration, and to
grant such variances only when it is demonstrated that such
actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the
granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be
put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the
official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to
circumstances unique to the property not created by the
landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the
essential character of the locality. Economic considerations
alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use
For the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Undue
hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access
to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be
granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in section
2160.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with the ordinance.
The board of appeals and adjustments or the governing body as
the case may be, may not permit as a variance any use that is
not permitted under the ordinance for property in the zone where
the affected person's land is located. The board or governing
body as the case may be, may permit as a variance the temporary
Page 5 of 6
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/462/357.html 1/17/2006
Minnesota Statutes 2005, 462.357
use of a one family dwelling as a two family dwelling. The
board or governing body as the case may be may impose conditions
in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect
adjacent properties.
Subd. 6a. Normal residential surroundings for
handicapped. It is the policy of this state that handicapped
persons and children should not be excluded by municipal zoning
ordinances or other land use regulations from the benefits of
normal residential surroundings. For purposes of subdivisions
6a through 9, "person" has the meaning given in section 245A.02,
subdivision 11.
Subd. 7. Permitted single family use. A state
licensed residential facility or a housing with services
establishment registered under chapter 144D serving six or fewer
persons, a licensed day care facility serving 12 or fewer
persons, and a group family day care facility licensed under
Minnesota Rules, parts 9502.0315 to 9502.0445 to serve 14 or
fewer children shall be considered a permitted single family
residential use of property for the purposes of zoning, except
that a residential facility whose primary purpose is to treat
juveniles who have violated criminal statutes relating to sex
offenses or have been adjudicated delinquent on the basis of
conduct in violation of criminal statutes relating to sex
offenses shall not be considered a permitted use.
Subd. B. Permitted multifamily use. Except as
otherwise provided in subdivision 7 or in any town, municipal or
county zoning regulation as authorized by this subdivision, a
state licensed residential facility serving from 7 through 16
persons or a licensed day care facility serving from 13 through
16 persons shall be considered a permitted multifamily
residential use of property for purposes of zoning. A township,
municipal or county zoning authority may require a conditional
use or special use permit in order to assure proper maintenance
and operation of a facility, provided that no conditions shall
be imposed on the facility which are more restrictive than those
imposed on other conditional uses or special uses of residential
property in the same zones, unless the additional conditions are
necessary to protect the health and safety of the residents of
the residential -facility. Nothing herein shall be construed to
exclude or prohibit residential or day care facilities from
single family zones if otherwise permitted by a local zoning
regulation.
HIST: 1965 c 670 s 7; 1969 c 259 s 1; 1973 c 123 art 5 s 7;
1973 c 379 s 4; 1973 c 539 s 1; 1973 c 559 s 1,2; 1975 c 60 s 2;
1978 c 786 s 14,15; Ex1979 c 2 s 42,43; 1981 c 356 s 248; 1982 c
490 s 2; 1982 c 507 s 22; 1984 c 617 s 6-8; 1985 c 62 s 3; 1.985
c 194 s 23; 1986 c 444; 1987 c 333 s 22; 1989 c 82 s 2; 1990 c
391 art 8 s 47; 1990 c 568 art 2 s 66,67; 1994 c 473 s 3; 1995 c
224 s 95; 1997 c 113 s 20; 1997 c 200 art 4 s 5; 1997 c 202 art
4 s 11; 1997 c 216 s 138; 1999 c 96 s 3,4; 1999 c 211 s 1; 2001
c 174 s 1; 2001 c 207 s 13,14; 2002 c 366 s 6; 2004 c 258 s 2;
lSp2005 c I art 1 s 92; art 2 s 146
Copyright 2005 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota.
http://www.revisor.Ieg,state.mn.us/stats/462/357.htm1 1/17/2006
Attachment 3
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS OR USES SECTION
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
Section 1. This amendment revises Section 42 -12 (c) (Nonconforming buildings or uses)
(additions are underlined and deletions are stricken):
A nonconforming building, structure or use destroyed by fire or other peril may be continued,
including through repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance, or improvement, but not
expansion, unless more than fifty (50) percent of its market value is destroyed and provided that
a building permit has been applied for within one - hundred and eighty (180 ) days from the date
the building, structure or use was damaged. In this case, the city may impose reasonable
conditions upon a building permit in order to mitigate any newly created impact on an adjacent
property.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper.
The City Council approved this ordinance on February 27, 2006.
T. •
Attest:
City Clerk
AGENDA NO. L4
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: Preliminary Approval for Issuance of Bonds and Equipment
Certificates
Bonds need to be issued to finance three public works improvement projects that
the City Council has approved. Improvement bonds totaling $6,085,000 are
planned for the projects that have special assessments that total at least 20% of
the project costs. The projects and financing plans are listed in the attached
report from Springsted Incorporated. Page 9 of the report lists annual tax levies
for the improvement bonds of $378,063-$468,650 payable 2007-2025 which are
required to finance the unassessed project costs. The report also suggests a bid
award on the bond sale at a special Council meeting at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday,
March 23. (There is a pre-agenda meeting that day at 4:45 p.m.)
Equipment certificates totaling $290,000 need to be issued to finance the
purchase of 800 MHz radios for Maplewood's Police and Fire departments that
the City Council approved on 10-14-04. The equipment to be purchased includes
portable radios for officers and firefighters along with mobile radios for squad cars
and firefighting vehicles. The total purchase cost is $646,372 but Ramsey
County will reimburse the City for a large portion of the cost. Some purchases
were made in 2004 that are not eligible for financing by the equipment
certificates. A transfer of $40,516.83 from the General Fund to the project fund is
needed to finance this purchase. Page 11 in the attached report from Springsted
Incorporated lists annual tax levies for the equipment certificates of $67,793-
$133,647 payable 2007-2010 which are required to finance the principal and
interest payments.
- • 111 - I • -• 2 1 • - a - . . - 0 - • 4 • -
off so •- •
2 — • — Is
approval for the sale of $290,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates, (3)
authorize the appropriate budget changes and a transfer of $40,516.83 from the
General Fund to the project fund to finance 2004 equipment purchases and (4)
schedule a special Council meeting at 5:00 p.m. • Thursday, March 23 for a bid
award on the bond issue and equipment certificates.
PAR NANCEMORMPERK06BONDS1
nri nq ed
February 16, 2006
Mr. Dan Faust
Finance Director
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109-2797
Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of:
Springsted Incorporated
380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
Saint Paul, IVIN 55101-2887
Tel: 651-223-3000
Fax: 651-223-3002
www.springsted.com
$6,085,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A
$290,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 20068
Dear Mr. Faust:
We have enclosed an electronic copy of our recommendations for the above-captioned issues for distribution to
Council members and City staff prior to your meeting on Monday, February 27, 2006.
We have also enclosed under separate cover contract amendment for services relating to arbitrage/re bate to include
these issues. If the City wishes to continue to engage Springsted for this service for the new issues, please sign the
amendment and return it to us.
If you should have any questions pertaining to the enclosed documents, or if you require additional copies, please do
not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Christine M. Hogan
Project Manager
ss
Enclosures
Recommendations
M
$6,085,000
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A
$290,000
General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2006E
Presented to:
Mayor Robert Cardinal
Members, City Council
Mr. Richard Fursman, City Manager
Mr. Dan Faust, Finance Director
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109-2797
Study No.: M1408Q2R2
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
February 16, 2006
Sprincjsted
a]
RECOMMENDATIONS
Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of:
$6,085,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A (the "Bonds")
$290,000 General Obligation Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 20068 (the "Certificates")
(together referred to as the "Issues" or "Obligations")
We respectfully request your consideration of our recommendations for the above-named Issues.
We recommend the following for the Obligations:
Action Requested To establish the date and time of receiving bids and
establish the terms and conditions of the offerings.
2.
3.
4.
61
Sale Date and Time Thursday, March 23, 2006 at 10:00 A.M., with
consideration for award by the City Council at
5:00 P.M. that same day.
Method of Sale The Issues will be sold through a competitive bidding
process. In the interest of obtaining as many bids as
possible, we have included a provision in the attached
Terms of Proposal for underwriters to submit their bid
electronically through the electronic bidding platform of
PARTY ®. In addition, physical bids (by phone or fax)
will be accepted at the offices of Springsted.
Authority for the Obligations
The Obligations are being issued pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475.
The Bonds are further authorized pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
The Certificates are further authorized pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301.
Repayment Term The Bonds will mature annually August 1, 2007
through 2026. Interest will be payable semi-annually
each February 1 and August 1, commencing
February 1, 2007.
The Certificates will mature annually August 1, 2007
through 2011. Interest will be payable semi-annually
each February 1 and August 1, commencing
February 1, 2007.
A
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
February 16, 2006
6. Security and Source of Payment
(a) Security
The Obligations are general obligations of the City
secured by its full faith and credit and taxing power.
(b) Payment Source The Bonds will be repaid with a combination of special
assessments and ad valorem property taxes.
The Certificates will be repaid with ad valorem property
taxes.
7. Prepayment Provisions The City may elect on August 1, 2016, and on any
date thereafter, to prepay the Bonds due on or after
August 1, 2017 at a price of par plus accrued interest.
Due to their short duration, the Certificates will not be
subject to prepayment prior to their stated maturity.
8. Term Bonds We have included a provision for the Bonds that
permits the underwriters to combine multiple maturity
years into a term bond, subject to mandatory
redemption on the same maturity schedule provided in
the Terms of Proposal. The advantage to the
underwriter is that it provides large blocks of bonds,
which are more attractive to bond funds, and certain
pension funds, which deal only with large blocks of
bonds. This in turn is a benefit to the City since selling
larger blocks of bonds reduces the risk to the
underwriter, allowing them to lower their costs and the
interest coupons. Since the Bonds are being offered
on a competitive bid basis and awarded on the lowest
true interest cost, the City will award the Bonds to the
best bid regardless of whether term bonds are chosen
or not.
Due to their short duration, term bonds will not be
permitted for the Certificates.
9. Credit Rating Comments An application will be made to Moody's Investors
Service for ratings on the Obligations. The City's
outstanding general obligation debt is currently rated
"Aa2 ;I .
Page 2
City of Maplewood, K1inneG0ta
February 16, 2006
10. Federal Tax'
Exempt Obligations
kA Bank Qualification Under Federal Tax Law, financial institutions cannot
deduct from income for federal income tax purposes,
expense that is allocable k] carrying andaCqU|hOgtaX-
exe0pdbOOdS. There iSGO exemption h3 this for "bank
qualified" bonds, which can b8SO designated ifthe
issuer does not issue more than $1U million nftax
exempt obligations in8 calendar year. Issues that are
bank qualified generally receive slightly lower interest
rates than issues that are not bank qualified. Since
the City does not expect 0J issue more than $1Umillion
{f tax-exempt obligations iO2O08 the Issues will be
designated 8S bank qualified.
0d Rebate Requirements All tax-exempt issues are subject t0the federal
arbitrage and rebate requirements, which require all
excess earnings created bv the financing k}b8rebated
k) the U.8. Treasury. The requirements generally
cover two categories: bond proceeds and debt service
funds. There are exemptions from rebate that may
apply in both U[ these categories.
There are exemptions to rebate if the proceeds of the
Bonds and Certificates are spent iO accordance with
one [f the applicable expenditure exemptions.
Proceeds used for construction purposes may qualify
for the 0'0OO8h 18'0OOth.Or24'0OOUhexpenditure
exCeDUOOS. Proceeds used t0purchase equipment
may qualify for either the 8-m0nkhor18-m0nth
expenditure exceptions tnrebate.
Kis our understanding that the City expects b}spend
the proceeds Of the Bonds within 24fO0OthSand
proceeds nf the Certificates within 18-0Vnths.
Although the City expects k) meet aDexpenditure
exemption for the Bonds and Certificates, itiS
important k> note that the expenditure exemptions are
8O actual test and not one Ofexpectations, Spr|Dgsted
currently provides arbitrage and rebate services Nthe
City. A contract amendment adding the Obligations
has been forwarded hO City staff.
Page
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
February 16, 2006
(c) Bona Fide Debt Service Fund The City must maintain a bona fide debt service fund
for the Bonds or be subject to yield restriction. This
requires restricting the investments held in the debt
service fund to the yield on the Bonds. A bona fide
debt service fund is a fund for which there is an equal
matching of revenue to debt service expense, with
carry over permitted equal to the greater of the
investment earnings in the fund for the prior year or
1/12 the debt service of the prior year.
Additional diligence should be exercised in monitoring
the debt service fund for the Bonds due to the potential
accumulation of assessment prepayments, which
could cause the debt service fund on the Bonds to
become non-bona fide.
(d) Economic Life The average life of the Obligations cannot exceed
120% of the economic life of the projects to be
financed.
The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance
street improvements which have an economic life of at
least 20 years, The average life of the Bonds is
11.945 years. The proceeds of the Certificates will be
used to purchase equipment which has an economic
life of 6 years. The average life of the Certificates is
3.454 years. Therefore the Issues are within the
economic life requirements.
(e) Federal Reimbursement Regulations
11. Continuing Disclosure
Federal reimbursement regulations require the City to
make a declaration, within 60 days of the actual
payment, of its intent to reimburse itself from expenses
paid prior to the receipt of Issue proceeds. It is our
understanding the City has taken whatever actions are
necessary to comply with the federal reimbursement
regulations in regards to the Issues.
The Obligations are subject to continuing disclosure
requirements set forth by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). The SEC rules require the City to
undertake an annual update of certain Official
Statement information and report any material events
to the national repositories. In the past, the City has
indicated that it will manage its own continuing
disclosure matters. We understand that the City will
continue that practice with these Issues.
Page 4
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
February 16, 2006
12. Attachments The Bonds
• Sources and Uses
• Assessment Income Schedule
• Debt Service Schedule
• Terms of Proposal
The Certificates
• Sources and Uses
Debt Service Schedule
Terms of Proposals
11 &ifllml W ki
The Bonds
Proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance the following three projects: (i) County Road D East, (ii) County Road D
West, and (iii) Kenwood Area Neighborhood streets. The sources and uses of funds for the Bonds are shown on
page 7. In addition to the bond proceeds, cash contributions totaling $899,235 will be used to pay for a portion of the
improvement projects.
The Bonds will be repaid with a combination of special assessments and ad valorem property taxes. Assessments in
the principal amount of $1,575.458 will be filed on or about October 1, 2006. The interest rate charged on the unpaid
balance of assessments is 5.9%. All assessments have been structured with equal annual principal payments over a
term of 15 years. The projected assessment schedule is shown on page 8.
Based on projected assessment income, it is expected that the City will be required to levy ad valorem taxes to pay a
portion of the debt service on the Bonds. The City will make its first levy for the Bonds in 2006 for collection in 2007.
The February 1, 2007 interest payment and a portion of the August 1, 2007 principal and interest payment will be paid
for with a cash transfer from the City's general fund. The first levy collection received in 2007 will be used to
reimburse the City's general fund. The remaining portion of the 2007 collections will be used to pay the
February 1, 2008 interest payment and the August 1, 2008 principal and interest payment on the Bonds. Thereafter,
each year's collection of taxes and assessments will be in an amount sufficient to pay the February 1, interest
payment and the August 1 principal and interest payment in the year following collection.
The Bonds have been structured around the projected assessment income with a level annual tax levy requirement
over a term of 20 years. The average annual levy requirement for the Bonds will be approximately $380,190 starting
in levy year 2007. The principal structure for the Bonds is shown on page 9. Page 9 shows the following information:
• Columns 1 through 4 show the principal maturity dates, the annual principal payments, estimated interest rates
and projected total principal and interest payments, given the current market environment.
Page 5
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
February 16, 2006
• Column 5 shows the 5% overlevy which is required by State statutes and serves as a protection to bondholders
and the City in the event of delinquencies in the collection of assessments or taxes.
# Column 6 shows the projected assessment income developed on page 8.
• Column 7 shows the tax levy requirement for the Bonds, which represents the difference between the projected
assessment income and 105% of debt service,
# Column 8 shows the year which the levy needs to be certified in order to pay the levy requirement on the Bonds.
The Certificates
The proceeds of the Certificates will be used to finance the acquisition of 800 MHz radios for the City's Police and
Fire Departments. Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301, specifies that the City may issue certificates of
indebtedness without exposure to a petition requirement calling for a referendum if the total amount of the issue does
not exceed 1/4 of 1% of the market value of the taxable property in the City. Based on the City's 2004/05 taxable
market value of $3,117,413,900, this represents a maximum issue size of $7,793,535. This issuance of $290,000 is
within that limitation and is not subject to taxpayer petition for a referendum.*
The Certificates will be repaid with ad valorem tax levies. The City will make its first levy in 2006 for collection in 2007
in amount sufficient to pay the February 1, 2007 through August 1, 2008 debt service payments. The
February 1, 2007 interest payment and a portion of the August 1, 2007 principal and interest payment will be paid for
with a cash transfer from the City's general fund. The first levy collection received in 2007 will be used to reimburse
the City's general fund. The remaining portion of the 2007 collections will be used to pay the February 1, 2008
interest payment and the August 1, 2008 principal and interest payment on the Certificates. Thereafter, each year's
collection of taxes will be in an amount sufficient to make the February 1 interest payment and the August 1 principal
and interest payment in the year following collection.
The sources and uses of the Certificates are shown on page 10. The debt service schedule for the Certificates is
shown on page 11. The Certificates are structured with even annual debt service payments over a term of five years
as directed by City staff.
*At the time this document was drafted the taxable market value for 200512006 was not available; therefore the taxable market
value for 200412005 was used. Based on this value, the Certificate size of $290,000 is well below the maximum issue size
allowed. Assuming that the 2005/2006 taxable market value is larger than the 2004/2005 value, the Certificates will satisfy the
limitation under the statute. Springsted will verify this once the 200512006 taxable market value is available.
Springsted Incorporated is pleased to again be of service to the City of Maplewood.
Respectfully submitted,
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
ss
Provided to Staff: Rebate Contract Amendment
Page 6 1 0
City nfMaplewood, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds
Series 2006A
Sources & Uses
Dated 04/@1/2006| Delivered 04/01/2006
Sources Of Funds
PaAmounofBondo------------------------------------------------
$6,085,080{0
SoweFvndTransfec--------------------------------------------------
443,24500
Environmental Utility Fund Tmnsfec .... -------................... -----------------------..........
383.580.00
vvAoFundTransfec --------------------------------------------------.
80.08010
Costsof Issuance ...........................................................................................................................................................
38,430,00
Uses Of Funds
KonwongAmomeigxUomooUGtreeto -----------------------------------------.
4,727.140,00
CountyRoad D East. .... ................................................................................ --..............
-----------.... 1,671,538.00
County Road DWest .-------------------------------------------------'
488,54410
Total Underwriter's Discount (1.2o0%) .... --...............................................................................................................
78.082.e0
Costsof Issuance ...........................................................................................................................................................
38,430,00
Rounding Amount
2,520,50
x=e,200611pp.="="m/m^cuFURFoST/211+12006/8:57Am,
1,575,458
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A
Assessment Income
ASSESSMENT INCOME
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +1
12/31/2006
-
-
-
12/31/2007
1 05,030.54
5.900%
116,190.03
221,220.57
12/31/2008
105,030.54
5.900%
86,755.22
191, 785.76
12/31/2009
105,030.54
5.900%
80,558.42
185, 588.96
12/31/2010
105,030.54
5.900%
74,361.62
179, 392.16
12/31/2011
105,030.54
5.900%
68,164.81
173,195.35
12/31/2012
105,030.53
5.900%
61,968.01
166, 998.54
12/31/2013
105,030.53
5.900%
55,771.21
160,801.74
12/31/2014
105,030.53
5.900%
49,574.41
154,604.94
12/31/2015
105,030.53
5.900%
43,377.61
148,408.14
12/31/2016
105,030.53
5.900%
37,180.81
142,211.34
12/31/2017
105,030.53
5.900%
30,984.01
136,014.54
12/31/2018
105,030.53
5.900%
24,787.21
129,817.74
12/31/2019
105,030.53
5.900%
18,590.40
123,620.93
12/31/2020
105,030.53
5.900%
12,393.60
117,424.13
12/31/2021
105,030.53
5.900%
6,196.80
111,227.33
Total
$1,575,458.00
-
$766,854.17
$2,342,312.17
SIGNIFICANT DATES
FilingDate .......................................................................................................................................... ............................... 10/01/2006
FirstPayment Date ............................................................................................................................ ............................... 12/31/2007
Senes2006Assessrnentr / SINGLEPURFOSE / 217412006 / 1:41FAI
cl' is
Page 8 12
, ;16,085,000
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds
Series 2006A
NET DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
Date
Principal
(1)
coupon
(2)
Interest
(3)
Total P +I
(4)
105% of Total
(5)
Assessment
(6)
Levy Required *
(7)
Levy Year
(8)
0810112006
-
-
-
-
-
............................... 4.3826565%
TrueInterest Cost ( TIC) .............................................................................................................
-
0810112007
35,000.00
3.350%
336,110.00
371,110.00
389,665.50
-
........... ........... ................ ........ 4.2780146%
WeightedAverage Maturity ........................................................................................................
0810112008
35,000.00
3.450%
250,910.00
285,910.00
300,205.50
221,220.57
468,650.43
2006
0810112009
295,000.00
3.550%
249,702.50
544,702.50
571,937.63
191,785.76
380,151.87
2007
0810112010
300,000.00
3.600%
239,230.00
539,230.00
566,191.50
185,588.96
380,602.54
2008
0810112011
305,000.00
3.700%
228,430.00
533,430.00
560,101.50
179,392.16
380,709.34
2009
0810112012
310,000.00
3.800%
217,145.00
527,145.00
553,502.25
173,195.35
380,306.90
2010
0810112013
315,000.00
3.900%
205,365.00
520,365.00
546,383.25
166,998.54
379,384.71
2011
0810112014
325,000.00
4.000%
193,080.00
518,080.00
543,984.00
160,801.74
383,182.26
2012
0810112015
330,000.00
4.050%
180,080.00
510,080.00
535,584.00
154,604.94
380,979.06
2013
0810112016
335,000.00
4.100%
166,715.00
501,715.00
526,800.75
148,408.14
378,392.61
2014
0810112017
345,000.00
4.150%
152,980.00
497,980.00
522,879.00
142,211.34
380,667.66
2015
08/0112018
355,000.00
4.200%
138,662.50
493,662.50
518,345.63
136,014.54
382,331.09
2016
0810112019
360,000.00
4.250%
123,752.50
483,752.50
507,940.13
129,817.74
378,122.39
2017
0810112020
370,000.00
4.300%
108,452.50
478,452.50
502,375.13
123,620.93
378,754.20
2018
08/0112021
380,000.00
4.350%
92,542.50
472,542.50
496,169.63
117,424.13
378,745.50
2019
0810112022
395,000.00
4.400%
76,012.50
471,012.50
494,563.13
111,227.33
383,335.80
2020
0810112023
305,000.00
4.450%
58,632.50
363,632.50
381,814.13
-
381,814.13
2021
0810112024
315,000.00
4.500%
45,060.00
360,060.00
378,063.00
378,063.00
2022
0810112025
330,000.00
4.550%
30,885.00
360,885.00
378,929.25
378,929.25
2023
0810112026
345,000.00
4.600%
15,870.00
360,870.00
378,913.50
378,913.50
2024
Total
$6,085,000.00
-
$3,109,617.50
$9,194,617.50
$9,654,348.38
$2,342,312.17
$7,312,036.21
*2006 Levy will be the debt service due on 211107, 811107, 211108, and 811108 in the total amount of $468,650.43
Dated.........................................................................................................................................
............................... 410112006
DeliveryDate ..............................................................................................................................
............................... 410112006
FirstCoupon Date ......................................................................................................................
............................... 210112007
Yield Statistics
BondYear Dollars ......................................................................................................................
............................... $72,688.33
AverageLife ...............................................................................................................................
............................... 11.945 Years
AverageCoupon ........................................................................................................................
............................... 4.2780146%
NetInterest Cost ( NIC) ...............................................................................................................
............................... 4.3826565%
TrueInterest Cost ( TIC) .............................................................................................................
............................... 4.3923879%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes .............................................................................................
............................... 4.2522949%
All Inclusive Cost ( AIC) ...............................................................................................................
............................... 4.4641142%
IRS Form 8038
NetInterest Cost... ........... ............................ ........... ........... ................ ...........
........... ........... ................ ........ 4.2780146%
WeightedAverage Maturity ........................................................................................................
............................... 11.945 Years
Series 20061mprovea t R 1 67N61X PI.RPOSE 1 211912006 1 8:53 Al
Page 9 13
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
General Obligation Equipment Certificates OfIndebtedness
Series 2006B
Sources & Uses
Dated 04/01/2006 1 Delivered 04/01/2006
Sources OfFunds
Uses DfFunds
Deposit m Project Construction Fund ...................................... ---........ ------------------...... ---... 250.175.00
Costsof Issuance ............ --.......................................... ................................ ---......... —................................ -- 12,39080
Total Underwriter's Discount (1.700%) .------------------------------------------ 4,930.00
m,es2006/ q ujp=eP/o=/xmuo/mRFOSr/ 21/+2006/ *wav
Page 10 14
$290,000
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness
Series 2006B
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +I
105% Levy *
Lev
Year
08/0112006
-
-
-
-
AverageCoupon ...................................................................................................................................................
-
08/01/2007
50,000.00
3.350%
13,690.00
63,690.00
............................... 3.5811578%
AllInclusive Cost ( RIG) ..........................................................................................................................................
08/0112008
55,000.00
3.450%
8,592.50
63,592.50
133
2006
08/01/2009
60,000.00
3.550%
6,695.00
66,695.00
70,029.75
2007
08/0112010
60,000.00
3.600%
4,565.00
64,565.00
67,793.25
2008
08/01/2011
65,000.00
3.700%
2,405.00
67,405.00
70,775.25
2009
Total
$290,000.00
-
$35,947.50
$325,947.50
$342,244.88
2006 Levy will be the debt service due on 2/1/07, 8/1107, 2/1/08, and 811108 in the total amount of $133,646.63.
SIGNIFICANT DATES
Dated ....................................................................................................................................................................
............................... 4/01/2006
DeliveryDate .........................................................................................................................................................
............................... 4/01/2006
FirstCoupon Date .................................................................................................................................................
............................... 2/01/2007
Yield Statistics
BondYear Dollars .................................................................................................................................................
............................... $1,001.67
AverageLife ..........................................................................................................................................................
............................... 3.454 Years
AverageCoupon ...................................................................................................................................................
............................... 3.5887687
NetInterest Cost ( NIC) ..........................................................................................................................................
............................... 4.0809484
TrueInterest Cost ( TIC) ........................................................................................................................................
............................... 4.1188881
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes ........................................................................................................................
............................... 3.5811578%
AllInclusive Cost ( RIG) ..........................................................................................................................................
............................... 5.5276476
IRS Form 8038
NetInterest Cost ...................................................................................................................................................
............................... 3.5887687
WeightedAverage Maturity ...................................................................................................................................
............................... 3.454 Years
Interest rates are estimates. Changes in rates may
cause significant alterations to this schedule.
The actual underwriter's discount bid may also vary.
Series 2006F,q�+iprnenl Gar / SWGUFURAISL / ?!1412006 / 1:44PM
SP r i gqs d
Page 11
15
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRUNGSTEDUNCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,A0UNNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2006A
Proposal for the Bonds will b8 received 0n Thursday, March 23 until 1O:OOA.k8,Central
TiQn8 at the OffiDSS Of SphDgSt8d Incorporated, 380 Jackson Sbreet, Suite 300, Saint Paul,
K8inneaot8, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the
Bonds will b8by the City Council @t5:OOP.K8.. Central Time, Of the same day.
SohngstGd will osSUmS OO liability for the inability of the bidder h3 reach Spri ngsted pr t0 the
time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to
constitute G contract between the bidder and the City t0 pUPChGS9 the Bonds nSg8Pd|8Ss of the
manner in which the Proposal iasubmitted.
(a) Sealed Bidding. Proposals may be submitted in 8 sealed envelope or by fax
(551)223-3046 t0 Sphngst8d. Si Prop0s8S, without final phC8 or cOUpODs may be
submitted to Gphngsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting
to SpringstRd the final PnOpOa8| phC8 and COUpODS, by b3|SphODS (051) 223-300O or fax
(851) 223-3048 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal.
(b) Electronic Bidding. Notice is hereby given that electronic proposals will be received vi
P/\R|T7 F0[ purpOses ofthe 8ksCtnJniC bidding pnJC83s the time 83 maintained by PARITY
shall constitute the official time with respect to all Bids submitted to PARITY Each bidder shall
be o0/e/v responsible for making necessary arrangements f0 access P4R/T for purposes of
submitting its electronic Bid in a timely manner and in C0Dp&snCe with the requirements of the
Terms 0fP Neither the City, its agents nor PAF<|TYv�
° shall have any duty Or obligation tO
undertake registration to bid for any prospective bidder or to provide or ensure electronic access
to any qualified prospective bidder, and neither the City' its @g8Dta nor PAR|T« shall be
responsible for a bidder's failure to register to bid or for any t3i|Une in the proper operation Of. Or
have GDy liability for any delays or interruptions of or any damages ooUSed by the S9n/inRs of
P4[�|T»� The City is using the services ofPAR|Tv as a communication mechanism to
conduct the electronic bidding for the Bonds, and PAF<|.. �v iS not 8O agent Of the City.
If any provi of this Terms of PrOooye| conflict with information provided by P/\R|Tv this
Terms 0f Proposal shall control. Further information about PAR|lY including any fee charged,
may be obtained from:
PAR|TY Broadway, 2 nd Floor, New York, New York 10018
Customer Support: (212) 849-5000
Page ~ 16
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated April 1, 2006, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2007. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature August 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
2007
$ 35,000
2012
$310,000
2017
$345,000
2022
$395,000
2008
$ 35,000
2013
$315,000
2018
$355,000
2023
$305,000
2009
$295,000
2014
$325,000
2019
$360,000
2024
$315,000
2010
$300,000
2015
$330,000
2020
$370,000
2025
$330,000
2011
$305,000
2016
$335,000
2021
$380,000
2026
$345,000
Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial
bonds and term bonds. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption
and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above at a price of par plus accrued interest
to the date of redemption. In order to designate term bonds, the proposal must specify "Years
of Term Maturities" in the spaces provided on the Proposal Form.
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "),
New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases
of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single
maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants.
Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of
the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the
responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by
participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial
owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the
Bonds with DTC.
The City will name the registrar, which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City
will pay for the services of the registrar.
The City may elect on August 1, 2016, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or
after August 1, 2017. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the
City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are
called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be
prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to
be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in
such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition, the City will pledge special
Page 13 17
assessments against benefited properties. The proceeds will be used to finance v8rk)US
Proposals improvement projects within the City.
shall be for not |eSS than $6 and accrued interest on the total principal
8nlOuDt of the Bonds. PnDp0SG|a shall be 8CCOOlp8ni8d by 8 Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") in
the form 0f3 certified Or cashier's check or o Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $60.850
payable to the order Ofthe City. If dl8Ck is uSRd, it must accompany the pn]pOSG|. |f8
Financial Surety Bond i3 used, it must befrom an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State OfMinnesota, and pr88ppnJv8d by the City. Such bond must be submitted t0
SpringSted Incorporated prior to the opening of the ppDpOSa|3. The Financial Surety Bond must
identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the
Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
[8qUin8d to submit its [}Sp0Sit to SpriDgSt8d |OCOrpO[8t8d in the form Of G certified Or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by SpringSted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central
TiQn8 On the next business day following the @vvGnd. If such [)SpOSit is not received by that
time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement.
The [}Sp0Sit received from the purchaser, the 8[nOUnt of which will be deducted at Sd±|8nl8Dt
and DO interest will 8CorUe to the purChoSer, will be deposited by the Qty. In the event the
purchaser fails t0 comply with the oCoSDtad pn]pOSG|. said amount will be retained by the City.
No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, r8C8SS8d. or continued to
another date without 8vv8rd of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral
multiples Of5/1000r 1/8Of196. Rates must be in |8v8| or ascending order. Bonds Of the same
maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No
conditional proposals will bRaccepted.
The Bonds will be ovvonded on the basis of the lowest interest rate h0 be determined on o true
interest COSt /l[|C\ basis. The City's computation Of the iDt8[SSt rate of each pnJpOSo|, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right b}: /i\vvoive non-substantive informalities of any proposal or of
nl8tberS relating h3 the ngD8iDt of pnJpOSG|S and 8vv8rd Of the BODdS. (ii) reject all pnUpOs@|S
without cause, and (iii) reject any ppDpOS8| that the City determines to have failed to comply with
the terms herein.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qU8]U» for issuance of any policy of nnUnkcip8| bond insurance or connnndnl8rt
therefor at the ODLiVn of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such conlrniirn8nt Sh8|| be at the S0|8 option and expense of the purchaser of
the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of
insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the Qh/ has requested and received G
rating on the Bonds from 8 rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating
agency fees shall bR the responsibility [f the purchaser.
Foi|Un8 of the nnUnkcip8| bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been 8vvGnd8d to the
purchaser shall not CVnsUiUL8 C8V88 for failure or refusal by the purchaser to 8Cc8DL delivery on
the Bonds.
CU8|PNUK4BERG
If the Bonds qVa|hv for 8sSi0nnl8rd of CU8|P nUnnU9rS such nUnnU9nS will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
Page ~ 18
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUS|P Service Bureau charge for the assi 0fCUS|Pid8nLific8LionnVnnb8rs
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days follow the d8L8 of their 8vv8rd. the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser through OTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be sub to neCRiDL by the
purchaser of8n approving legal Opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of
Saint Paul and Minneapolis, K8inn8Gota, and of cUSk}nn8ry closing papers, including 8 no-
litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds Gh8|| be nn8d8 in federal,
0r equivalent, funds that shall b8 received 8L the offices 0f the City or its designee not later than
12:00 Noon, {|8ntr8| Time. Unless COnnp|i8nC8 with the terms of payment for the Bonds has
been nn8d8 impossible by action of the City. or its 80RnLs. the purchaser shall be |i8b|H L0 the
City for any |VsS GVff8r8d by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said
terms for payment.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
On the d8L8 of actual issuance and delivery [fthe Bonds, the {|Uv will execute and deliver 8
Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (th8 "Und8rt8Nng")vvh8n8Und9rthe City will covenant for the
benefit of the owners of the Bonds to provide certain financial and other information about the
City and notices of certain occurrences to information repositories as specified in and required
by SEC RV|8 15c2-12/b\/5\.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Si8L8nl8rt containing pertinent information
relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will S8nxe as 8 nearly final Official 8tat8nn8n0
within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies Cf
the C)ffiCi8| Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser
is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, SphnQGied Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street,
Suite 3OU, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55181, telephone (051)223-3800.
The (}ffiCi8| Statement, when further supp by an addendum or addenda specifying the
nn8LVritv dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by |8vv, shall constitute 8 "Final {)ffiCi8| Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds as that L9rnn is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost Lothe
senior managing underwriter [f the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 258 copies Vfthe
Official SL8t8nn8nL and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate LV which the Bonds are awarded 88 its 808nL for
pVrp0S8S of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter.
Any underwriter delivering 8 pn}poS8| with respect to the Bonds 8gr89S thereby that if its
pn}p0SG| is accepted by the City /i\iL Sh8|| accept such designation and (ii) it Sh8|| enter into G
0onb8CtVa| relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring
the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter 0fthe Final Official Statement.
Dated February 27, 2006
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ KGrRnGVilfoi|8
City Clerk
P8O�1�
~ 19
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRUNGSTEDUNCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$290,000
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,A0UNNESOTA
Proposal GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS, SERIES 2006B
for the Certificates will be received on Thursday, K88rCh 23, 2008, until 10:00 A.M.,
CSOtn3| Tinn8 at the OffiCSS of SphOOStSd Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint
Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award Of
the Certificates will b8by the City Council @t5:OOP.K8.. Central Time, Of the same day.
SohngstGd will osSUmS OO liability for the inability of the bidder h3 reach Spri ngsted pr t0 the
time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to
constitute 8 contract between the bidder and the City to pUroh@S8 the Certificates regardless of
the manner in which the Proposal i3submitted.
(a) Sealed Bidding. Proposals may be submitted in 8 sealed envelope or by fax
(551)223-3046 t0 Sphngst8d. Si Prop0s8S, without final phC8 or cOUpODs may be
submitted to Gphngsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting
to SpringstRd the final PnOpOa8| phC8 and COUpODS, by b3|SphODS (051) 223-300O or fax
(851) 223-3048 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal.
(b) Electronic Bidding. Notice is hereby given that electronic proposals will be received vi
P/\R|T7 F0[ purpOses ofthe 8ksCtnJniC bidding pnJC83s the time 83 maintained by PARITY
shall constitute the official time with respect to all Bids submitted to PARITY Each bidder shall
be o0/e/v responsible for making necessary arrangements f0 access P4R/T for purposes of
submitting its electronic Bid in a timely manner and in C0Dp&snCe with the requirements of the
Terms 0fP Neither the City, its agents nor PAF<|TYv�
° shall have any duty Or obligation tO
undertake registration to bid for any prospective bidder or to provide or ensure electronic access
to any qualified prospective bidder, and neither the City' its @g8Dta nor PAR|T« shall be
responsible for a bidder's failure to register to bid or for any t3i|Une in the proper operation Of. Or
have GDy liability for any delays or interruptions of or any damages ooUSed by the S9n/inRs of
P4[�|T»� The City is using the services ofPAR|Tv as a communication mechanism to
conduct the electronic bidding for the Certificates, and v is not an agent of the City.
If any provi of this Terms of PrOooye| conflict with information provided by P/\R|Tv this
Terms 0f Proposal shall control. Further information about PAR|lY including any fee charged,
may be obtained from:
PAR|TY Broadway, 2 nd Floor, New York, New York 10018
Customer Support: (212) 849-5000
Page 16
DETAILS OF THE CERTIFICATES
The Certificates will be dated Aoh| 1, 2000, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1. 2007. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months.
The Certificates will mature August 1 in the years and amounts 8sfollows:
2007 $50000 2008 $80000 2011 865000
2008 $55,000 2010 $60,000
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Certificates will beissued by means ofG book entry system with n0 physical distribution of
Certificates made to the public. The Certificates will be issued in hJUy n]QiSt8r8d h]rnn and one
Certificate, representing the 8QQr8Q8Le principal amount [fthe Certificates rn8LUhn0 in each
will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust
Company ("[)TC") New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the
Certificates. Individual purchases of the Certificates may be made in the principal amount of
$5 any multiple thereof [f8 single maturity through book entries made Vn the books and
records ofC)TC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to C)TC
or its nominee GS n8giSL8ped owner of the Certificates. Transfer of principal and inL9r8SL
payments LV participants of DTC will be the responsibility of [)TC; transfer of principal and
intHn8GL payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such
participants and other nominees Vf beneficial owners. The purchaser, 8s a condition Cfdelivery
of the Certificates, will be required to deposit the Certificates with DTC.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the registrar, which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City
will pay for the services of the registrar.
The Certificates will not be subject to payment inadvance of their respective stated maturity
dates.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The {|Hrtifit8L8S will be general obi0GLk}nG of the City for which the City will o|8dQ8 its full faith
and Credit and power to levy direct general 8d v8|or8nn taxes. The proceeds will be Used to
finance the acquisition of equipment for the City's police and fire departments.
Proposals shall be for not h*as than $285'070 and accrued interest on the total principal amount
of the Certificates. PrOpOS@|S Sh8]| be @CCO[np8Died by G Good Faith Deposit /"[]8pOSb"
form of certified Or cashier's check or Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $2,900,
payable to the order Ofthe City. If check is USRd. it must accompany the pn]pOSG|. |f8
Financial Surety Bond i3 used, it must befrom an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State OfMinnesota, and pr88ppnJv8d by the City. Such bond must be submitted t0
SpringSted Incorporated prior to the opening of the ppDpOSa|3. The Financial Surety Bond must
identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the
Certificates are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
[8qUin8d to submit its [}Sp0Sit to SpriDgSt8d |OCOrpO[8t8d in the form Of G certified Or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by SpringSted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central
Page ~ 21
Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Depo isnot received by that
Unn8. the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the O8poSd requirement.
The Deposit received from the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement
and no interest will accrue to the purchaser, will be deposited by the City. In the event the
purchaser fails to comply with the accepted pn]pOs8|. said amount will be retained by the City.
No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for avv8nd of the Certificates i8 adioVrned, recessed, or continued
to another date without 8vv8nd of the Certificates having been rn8d8. Rates shall be in integral
nnu|Up|8s of 5/100 Or 1/8 Of 196. Rates nnUSt be in |9v9| or ascending order. Certificates of the
s8nn8 rn8tVrih/ shall bear a SinQ|8 n8L8 from the date of the Certificates to the d8L8 of maturity.
No conditional proposals will beaccepted.
F-1 V�
The Certificates will be 8vvord8d On the basis of the |Ovv8St iDbar8at n3be h3 be d9t8Q0iOmd OD G
true interest o0St (F|[}) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each pnnpoao|. in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
The City will rRSRme the right to: /i\vv8ivS non-substantive informalities of any pnJpOS8| Or Of
nn8Uera relating to the receipt of proposals and 8vvand of the Certificates, (ii) reject all proposals
without cause, and (iii) reject any proposal that the City determines t0 have failed to comply with
the terms herein.
If the Certificates qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Certificates, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Certificate nor any error with
[8SpSCt Ul8r9t0 will constitute C8USG for failure or refusal by the purchaser to @CCRot delivery Of
the Certificates. The CUS|F` Service Bureau charge for the assignment ofCUS|P identification
numbers shall be paid by the purchaser.
Within 40 days follow the date of their award, the Certif will be delivered without cost to
the purchaser through [}TC in New York, New York. Delivery will be SUhieSt to receipt by the
purchaser Of@D approving |8g@| opinion Of Briggs and WYOrg@O PrOf8SSiOn8| /\SaOCi8tiOD. Of
Saint Paul and Minneapolis, K8inD83Oto, and of customary closing papers, including o no-
litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Certificates Sh@|| be nl@dR in
federal, or equivalent, funds that aho|| be received at the offices of the City orits designee not
later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. UD|8aS COnlp|i8nnR with the t8rQna of payment for the
Certificates has been made impossible by action of the City. Or its agents the purchaser shall
be |i@b|R to the City for any |OSS Suff8F8d by the City by PSGS0D Of the purchaser's non-
compliance with said terms for payment.
CONTINUING [}|G[}k3SURE
On the date of actual issuance and deli of the Certificates, the City will execute and deliver
8 Continuing 0iSdOSUnR Undertaking (th8 "Und8dGking")vvhRreuDd8rthe City will covenant for
the benefit of the owners Of the Certificates t0 provide certain financial and Other information
about the City and notices of certain occurrences to iDfOr[n@ti0O n8pOSih3hRs GS specified in and
required by SEC Rule 15c2-12(b)(5).
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation ofon Official Statement containing pertinent information
relative to the Certificates, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly final Official
Page 18
Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For copies of the Official SL8L8nn8rt or for any additional information prior [0 s8|8. any
prospective purchaser |8 referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, GphnQst8d Incorporated,
380 Jackson Street, Suite 30U Saint Paul, Minnesota 551O1 telephone (851) 223'3O0O.
The (]ffi[j8| 8LGL8nn8nL when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying thR
maturity dates, principal annOUntS and interest rates of the Certificates, together vvhh any other
inhJnn8U0n required by |8vv. Gh8|| constitute 8 "Final Official Statement" of the C|h/ with respect
to the Certificates, 8s that term is defined in RV|8 15C2-12. By awarding the Certificates to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting G pn]p0s8| therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such avv8nj, it shall provide without cost tnthe
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates are awarded 50 copies of
the Official Statement and the addendum Vr addenda described above. The City designates the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates are awarded as its agent
for purposes Of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating
Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering 8 pn]p0s8| with respect LV the Certificates agrees
thereby that if its pn}pVs8| is accepted by the City /i\ it shall accept such designation and (ii) it
shall enter into 8 contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters 8fthe Certificates for
pUrpVG8G of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final [)fhCi8|
Statement.
Dated February 27, 2006
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ KGrRnGViUni|8
City Clerk
Page 19
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
HELD: FEBRUARY 27, 2006
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council
of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on
February 27, 2006, at o'clock _.M. for the purpose in part of authorizing the competitive
negotiated sale of the $6,085,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE COMPETITIVE
NEGOTIATED SALE OF $6,085,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2006A
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the
"City "), has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue $6,085,000 General
Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A (the 'Bonds "), to finance various improvement
projects within the City; and
B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Springsted Incorporated, in Saint Paul,
Minnesota ( "Springsted "), as its independent financial advisor and is therefore authorized to sell
these obligations by a competitive negotiated sale in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,
Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Authorization The City Council hereby authorizes Springsted to solicit
proposals for the competitive negotiated sale of the Bonds.
2. Meeting; Proposal Opening This City Council shall meet at the time and
place specified in the Terms of Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A for the purpose of
considering proposals for, and awarding the sale of, the Bonds. The proposals shall be received
at the offices of Springsted and shall be opened at the time specified in such Terms of Proposal.
3. Terms of Proposal The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the
negotiation thereof are fully set forth in the "Terms of Proposal" attached hereto as Exhibit A and
hereby approved and made a part hereof.
4. Official Statement In connection with the sale, the City Clerk, Mayor and
other officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Springsted and
1875376v1
24
participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds, and to execute and deliver it
on behalf of the City upon its completion.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
1875376v1 2 25
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and
foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a
full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council duly called and
held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the City's $6,085,000 General
Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A.
WITNESS my hand on February 27, 2006.
City Clerk
1875376v1 .5 26
iai:11aIIM
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$6,085,000
CITY OF • i i MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2006A
Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Thursday, March 23, 2006, until 10:00 A.M.,
Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint
Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of
the Bonds will be by the City Council at 5 :00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the
time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to
constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless of the
manner in which the Proposal is submitted.
(a) Sealed Bidding. Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3046
to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted
prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final
Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3046 for inclusion in
the submitted Proposal.
I'
(b) Electronic Bidding. Notice is hereby given that electronic proposals will be received via
PARITY R . For purposes of the electronic bidding process, the time as maintained by PARITY
shall constitute the official time with respect to all Bids submitted to PARITY ° . Each bidder
shall be solely responsible for making necessary arrangements to access PARITY, for purposes
ofsubmitting its electronic Bid in a timely manner and in compliance with the requirements of
the Terms of Proposal. Neither the City, its agents nor PARITY shall have any duty or
obligation to undertake registration to bid for any prospective bidder or to provide or ensure
electronic access to any qualified prospective bidder, and neither the City, its agents nor
PARITY shall be responsible for a bidder's failure to register to bid or for any failure in the
proper operation of, or have any liability for any delays or interruptions of or any damages
caused by the services of PARITY. The City is using the services of PARITY solely as a
communication mechanism to conduct the electronic bidding for the Bonds, and PARITY is not
an agent of the City.
If any provisions of this Terms of Proposal conflict with information provided by PARITY`, this
Terms of Proposal shall control. Further information about PARITY including any fee
charged, may be obtained from:
1875376v1 A- I 27
PARITY, 1359 Broadway, 2 Floor, New York, New York 10018
Customer Support. (212) 849 -5000
7lIIIT- i1rl.Y!]��:hIT�1�1�7.y
The Bonds will be dated April 1, 2006, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2007. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature August 1 in the years and amounts as follows;
2007
$ 35,000
2012
$310,000
2017
$345,000
2022
$395,000
2008
$ 35,000
2013
$315,000
2018
$355,000
2023
$305,000
2009
$295,000
2014
$325,000
2019
$360,000
2024
$315,000
2010
$300,000
2015
$330,000
2020
$370,000
2025
$330,000
2011
$305,000
2016
$335,000
2021
$380,000
2026
$345,000
Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial
bonds and term bonds. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption
and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above at a price of par plus accrued interest
to the date of redemption. In order to designate term bonds, the proposal must specify "Years of
Term Maturities" in the spaces provided on the Proposal Form.
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "),
New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual
purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof
of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its
participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as
registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of
DTC will be the responsibility of DTC, transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial
owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of
beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to
deposit the Bonds with DTC.
The City will name the registrar, which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City
will pay for the services of the registrar.
The City may elect on August 1, 2016, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or
after August 1, 2017. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the
City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are
called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be
prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to
1875376v1 A -2 28
be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in
such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge special
assessments against benefited properties. The proceeds will be used to finance various
improvement projects within the City.
MVAa We] a9 me] 03.Y�1IW
Proposals shall be for not less than $6,008,938 and accrued interest on the total principal amount
of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in the form
of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $60,850, payable to
the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany the proposal. If a Financial Surety
Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of
Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted
Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify
each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are
awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to
submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire
transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the
next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the
Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The
Deposit received from the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no
interest will accrue to the purchaser, will be deposited by the City. In the event the purchaser
fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No
proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples
of 51100 or 1/8 of I %. Rates must be in level or ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity
shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional
proposals will be accepted.
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of
matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals
without cause, and (iii) reject any proposal that the City determines to have failed to comply with
the terms herein.
1 0 ,
1610 1716ML �[ 1'r/�111�1�17f1:�_fy l7f.Yi]�I11[�] I
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
1875376v1 A -3 29
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the
Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance
shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the
Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall
be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the
purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of
Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no-
litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal,
or equivalent, funds that shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than
12:00 Noon, Central Time. Unless compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds has
been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City
for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for
payment.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
On the date of actual issuance and delivery of the Bonds, the City will execute and deliver a
Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (the "Undertaking ") whereunder the City will covenant for
the benefit of the owners of the Bonds to provide certain financial and other information about
the City and notices of certain occurrences to information repositories as specified in and
required by SEC Rule 15e2- 12(b)(5).
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information
relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly final Official Statement
within the meaning of Rule 15e2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of
the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser
is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street,
Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223 -3000.
1875376v1 A -4 30
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter
or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than
seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior
managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 85 copies of the Official
Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior
managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes
of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any
underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is
accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual
relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt
by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated February 27, 2006 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/sl Karen Guifoile
City Clerk
1875376v1 A -5 31
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
HELD: FEBRUARY 27, 2006
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council
of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on
February 27, 2006, at o'clock _.M. for the purpose in part of authorizing the competitive
negotiated sale of the $290,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness,
Series 2006B.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE COMPETITIVE
NEGOTIATED SALE OF $290,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF
INDEBTEDNESS, SERIES 2006B
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the
"City "), has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue $290,000 General
Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2006B (the "Certificates "), to finance
the acquisition of equipment for the City's police and fire department; and
B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Springsted Incorporated, in Saint Paul,
Minnesota ( "Springsted "), as its independent financial advisor and is therefore authorized to sell
these obligations by a competitive negotiated sale in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,
Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Authorization The City Council hereby authorizes Springsted to solicit
proposals for the competitive negotiated sale of the Certificates.
2. Meeting; Proposal Opening This City Council shall meet at the time and
place specified in the Terms of Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A for the purpose of
considering proposals for, and awarding the sale of, the Certificates. The proposals shall be
received at the offices of Springsted and shall be opened at the time specified in such Terms of
Proposal.
3. Terms of Proposal The terms and conditions of the Certificates and the
negotiation thereof are fully set forth in the "Terms of Proposal" attached hereto as Exhibit A and
hereby approved and made a part hereof.
1875387v1
32
4. Official Statement In connection with the sale, the City Clerk, Mayor and
other officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Springsted and
participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Certificates, and to execute and
deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
1875387v1 2 33
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and
foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a
full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council duly called and
held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the City's $290,000 General
Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2006B.
WITNESS my hand on February 27, 2006.
City Clerk
1875387v1 .5 34
iai:11aIIM
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$290,000
CITY OF iii MINNESOTA
'GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS, SERIES 2006B
Proposals for the Certificates will be received on Thursday, March 23, 2006, until 10:00 A.M.,
Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint
Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of
the Certificates will be by the City Council at 5 :00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the
time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to
constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Certificates regardless of
the manner in which the Proposal is submitted.
(a) Sealed Bidding. Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3046
to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted
prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final
Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3046 for inclusion in
the submitted Proposal.
I'
(b) Electronic Bidding. Notice is hereby given that electronic proposals will be received via
PARITY R . For purposes of the electronic bidding process, the time as maintained by PARITY
shall constitute the official time with respect to all Bids submitted to PARITY ° . Each bidder
shall be solely responsible for making necessary arrangements to access PARITY, for purposes
ofsubmitting its electronic Bid in a timely manner and in compliance with the requirements of
the Terms of Proposal. Neither the City, its agents nor PARITY shall have any duty or
obligation to undertake registration to bid for any prospective bidder or to provide or ensure
electronic access to any qualified prospective bidder, and neither the City, its agents nor
PARITY shall be responsible for a bidder's failure to register to bid or for any failure in the
proper operation of, or have any liability for any delays or interruptions of or any damages
caused by the services of PARITY. The City is using the services of PARITY solely as a
communication mechanism to conduct the electronic bidding for the Certificates, and PARITY
is not an agent of the City.
If any provisions of this Terms of Proposal conflict with information provided by PARITY`, this
Terms of Proposal shall control. Further information about PARITY including any fee
charged, may be obtained from:
I875387vl A -I 35
PARITY, 1359 Broadway, 2 nd Floor, New York, New York 10018
Customer Support. (212) 849 -5000
DETAILS OF THE CERTIFICATES
The Certificates will be dated April 1, 2006, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2007. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Certificates will mature August 1 in the years and amounts as follows;
2007 $ 50,000 2009 $ 60,000 2011 $ 65,000
2008 $ 55,000 2010 $ 60,000
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Certificates will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Certificates made to the public. The Certificates will be issued in fully registered form and one
Certificate, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Certificates maturing in each year,
will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company
( "DTC "), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Certificates.
Individual purchases of the Certificates may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any
multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC
and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as
registered owner of the Certificates. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants
of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to
beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other
nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Certificates, will
be required to deposit the Certificates with DTC.
The City will name the registrar, which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City
will pay for the services of the registrar.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The Certificates will not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity
dates.
1875387v1 A -2 36
The Certificates will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full
faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. The proceeds will be used to
finance the acquisition of equipment for the City's police and fire departments.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $285,070 and accrued interest on the total principal amount
of the Certificates. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in the
form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $2,900,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany the proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must
identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the
Certificates are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central
Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time,
the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The
Deposit received from the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no
interest will accrue to the purchaser, will be deposited by the City. In the event the purchaser
fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No
proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Certificates is adjourned, recessed, or continued
to another date without award of the Certificates having been made. Rates shall be in integral
multiples of 51100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in level or ascending order. Certificates of the
same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Certificates to the date of maturity. No
conditional proposals will be accepted.
Ui
The Certificates will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a
true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to; (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of
matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Certificates, (ii) reject all proposals
without cause, and (iii) reject any proposal that the City determines to have failed to comply with
the terms herein.
I875387vl A -3 37
Ca> R&II20l1NNT1.3NNl iy
If the Certificates qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Certificates, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Certificate nor any error with
respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of
the Certificates. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification
numbers shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Certificates will be delivered without cost
to the purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by
the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of
Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no-
litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Certificates shall be made in
federal, or equivalent, funds that shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not
later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Unless compliance with the terms of payment for the
Certificates has been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be
liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance
with said terms for payment.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
On the date of actual issuance and delivery of the Certificates, the City will execute and deliver a
Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (the "Undertaking ") whereunder the City will covenant for
the benefit of the owners of the Certificates to provide certain financial and other information
about the City and notices of certain occurrences to information repositories as specified in and
required by SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5).
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information
relative to the Certificates, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly final Official
Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For
copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective
purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson
Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55 10 1, telephone (651) 223 -3000.
I875387vl A -4 38
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Certificates, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Certificates, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Certificates to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates are awarded 85 copies of
the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates are awarded as its agent
for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating
Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Certificates agrees
thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it
shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Certificates
for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official
Statement.
Dated February 27, 2006 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Isl Karen Guifoile
City Clerk
I875387vl A -5 39