Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 09-10 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, September 10 2007 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 16 B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Acknowledgement of Maplewood Residents Serving the Country D ,��a*lqwoml 111111111 Mayor's Address on Protocol: 'Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council, It is our desire to keep all discussions civil as we work through difficult issues tonight If you are here for a Public Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with the Policies and Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. When you address the council, please state your name and address clearly for the record. All commentsIquestions shall be posed to the Mayor and Council. I then will direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments,' E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. August 27, 2007 Council Manager Workshop Meeting Minutes 2. August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting Minutes F. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS G. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. New Maplewood Police Department Sergeant H. PUBLIC HEARINGS Crestview Forest Improvements, Deer Ridge Lane, City Project 06-21 a. Assessment Hearing, 7:00 p.m. b. Approve Resolution for Adoption of Assessment Roll c. Resolution Ordering Work to be done by Day Labor CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Claims 2. Mogren Street Improvements, City Project 06-17 th th a. Revise Assessment Hearing Date from September 24 to October 8 3. Conditional Use Permit Review— Dege Garden Center, 831 Century Avenue North 4. Conditional Use Permit Review- St. Paul Regional Water Services, 1900 Rice St. 5. Conditional Use Permit Review — Cottagewood PUD, Farrell Street All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. J. AWARD OF BIDS K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. City Code Amendment — Planning Commission (Second Reading) 2. Comprehensive Plan Updates, Consider Contracts with Schoell-Madson for Phase I of Land Use Plan Components and Phase I of Parks, Trails and Open Space Component and with Kimley-Horn for Transportation Component 3. Lark Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-15 a. Resolution Approving Revised Assessment Roll 4. Ferndale Geranium Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-14 a. Resolution Approving Revised Assessment Roll b. Resolution Approving No Parking on the west side of Ferndale Avenue 5. Consideration of Partnership Change — St. Paul Monastery Property Development L. NEW BUSINESS 1. The Regents Senior Housing Development (Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway) a. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Revisions b. Parking Reduction Authorization c. Design Approval 2. Gladstone Redevelopment Project — Phase 1, City Project 04-21, Resolution Requesting Cooperation Agreement Funding from MnDOT for TH 61 — Frost Improvements 3. Pond Overlook Public Improvements, 2161 County Road D, Project 07-08 a. Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment Hearing for October 8, 2007 4. Desoto Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06-16 a. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll for Doug Jones Parking Bays and Sanitary Sewer Improvements b. Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment Hearing for October 8, 2007 5. Preliminary Approval of Proposed Tax Levy Payable in 2008 6. Set Public Hearing Dates on Proposed 2008 Budget and Property Tax Levy 7. Resolution Providing for the Competitive Negotiated Sale of $5,090,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007E 8. Proposal for Scheduling City Council Public Hearings in the Future 9. Discussion on City Council Policy regarding City Commission Membership M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 249-2001 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability. RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language. Agenda Item El MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL MANAGER8W0RKGH{}P Monday, August 27.2O07 Council Chambers, City Hall 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Ch GL5:0Up.rn.bv Mayor LonQrie. � and was called to order B. ROLL CALL loll Diana Longhe Present Rebecca Cave, C0UnC|nlemb8r Present Erik Hj8||e.CounCi|nn9nnb8r Present Kathleen JuRDS[nGOD.CouOCi|[n9[nbRr Present Will F<0SsbGCh Present APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor LODgri8 moved tO approve the agenda. Seconded by{|oUnci|rnennbHrCave. AveS - A|| NEW BUSINESS 1. Cons ervation 8. Staff Presentati b. MN Land Trust ~�~ — Sarah 8tnJmm8n |. Naturalist, Ginny Gaynor, gave aO Open Space presentat tO the counc ' a. the Historical Background, b. criteria used to rank sites within the citv. C. acqu isition of the preserves sites, d. K8a philosophy regarding management and uses Vf these sites, — e -_ [ program status update, g. identify the location of the 14 preserve sites and provide site specific details concerning each of the sites, After her presentation Ms. Gaynor gave a summary and addressed questions. 2. Conservation Director for the C8Otn@| Region of the k8inn8SOt@ Land T[U3t. Sarah Stn}nnnn8n University Avenue West, Suite 24O, St. Paul, gave 8 presentation regarding the Open Space Protection Plan. A proposal for Phase 2 Implementation. Including the: 8. background and Purpose. b. process. c. proposed Terms. d. costs. After her presentation Ms. Strommen answered questions of the City Council. August 27, 2007, City Council Workshop 2. Gladstone Streetscape Improvements — Landscape Architect for Gladstone a. Public Works Director, Chuck Ahl, gave a presentation regarding the Gladstone Neighborhood Streetscape Study. The three different design concepts that are options to be considered for the theme of the streetscapes are: 1. Recreation/Nature/Open Space 2. Historic 3. Eco-Village At the conclusion of his presentation Mr. Ahl had an open discussion with the City Council. E. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Longrie moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:00 p.m. August 27, 2007, City Council Workshop 2 Agenda Item E2 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m., Monday, August 27, 2007 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 15 A. CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Mayor Longrie. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL Diana Longrie, Mayor Rebecca Cave, Councilmember Erik Hjelle, Councilmember Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Will Rossbach, Councilmember D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA G1. City Manager Copeland requested mc making item Fl. Swearing in of Office to item G1. F2. CERT training — Chief Lukin F3. Emergency Storm Response — Chuck K1. City Manager Copeland requested Ta Improvement Plan M1. Wendy's Restaurant — Rebecca Cave M2. NEST — Eric Hjelle M3. City Manager Evaluation Update — Ka Present Present Present Present Present Ping G1. Appointments/Presentations to item Fl. Markese Benjamin and moving Visitor Presentations K1. Unfinished Business, Adoption of the Capital Juenemann sm by Councilmember Ayes — All E. APPROVAL OF MINUT 1. Minutes from the August 13, 2007, 5 p.m. Council/Manager Workshop. Councilmember Cave moved to aDDrove the Council /Manager WorkshoD minutes of August 13 2007, 5 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes - Mayor Longrie, Councilmembers Cave, Hjelle, Rossbach Abstention - Juenemann August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 2. Minutes from the August 13, 2007, 7:00 p.m. City Council Meeting. F9 Councilmember Cave moved to approve the City Council Meeting minutes of August 13, 2007. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes- All 3. Minutes from the August 16, 2007, 5:00 p.m. City Council Meeting (A continuation of August 13, 2007). Councilmember Cave moved to approve the City Council Meeting minutes of August 16, 2007. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes — APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Swearing in of Police Officer Markese Benjamin a. Chief Thomalla introduced Markese Benjamin and Mayor Longrie gave Officer Benjamin the Oath of Office. 9 2. CERT Training — Chief Lukin Maplewood Fire Chief, Steve Lukin said the Maplewood Fire Station at 1955 Clarence Street will be holding nine CERT training classes (Certified Emergency Response Training) beginning Wednesday, September 12, 2007, through Wednesday, October 24 from 6:30- 9:30 p.m. The last training class will be held Thursday, November 1, with the final exercise and graduation at the Ramsey County Law Enforcement Center on Wednesday, November 7. 3. Emergency Storm Response - Chuck Ahl Mr. Ahl spoke regarding the recent storm that hit parts of Maplewood harder than others along with the loss of power and the emergency storm response team that responded to the situation. He also thanked the City of North St. Paul who assisted Maplewood with the use of some of their equipment. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Emil Sturzenegger, 2455 Londin Lane, Maplewood, spoke regarding the problems with cable television because he enjoys watching the city council, board and commission meetings. He expressed concern that there have been problems with the transmittal of the programs and that council resolve the issue. 2. Maggie Chaukline, 1863 County Road B East, spoke regarding the traffic concerns the neighborhood has regarding the increased traffic on County Road B from the Highway 36 construction detour and the accidents that have happened because of the detour. Chief Thomalla spoke regarding the discussion he had with Ramsey County and the contractors working on Highway 36 and the latest information he has to share with the public. August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 2 3. Bob Zick, 2515 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, addressed the council. He stated the proper way to say the Pledge of Allegiance. He also asked newly sworn in police officer Markese Benjamin to read the oath and learn the oath and documents that go along with serving the public and t0 know the rights Ofthe citizens. M8 spoke regarding the September 11.200Y. Primary Election and General Election November 6, and reminded voters to research who they vote for, what the candidates stand for and their history in Maplewood. IN 4. Elizabeth 08tten, 2747 C|8n]nC8 Street, K88pkevvOod, spoke regarding the dated correspondence she sent to the council and Mayor and the fact that those were dated requests that she is still waiting for responses. She also expressed her feelings Vf disappointment regarding the lack 0f response from the city. 5. Christine Stone, 2Y27 Hazelwood, Maplewood. Ms. Stone expressed her opinion Vfthings that have occurred with the management Of the city. O. N8ntyL8z8ry8n. in pn}ph8 persona, in sunnmo jUrR, 10734 West Lake Road Rice, spoke regarding the rules of professional conduct iU city government. 7. Bill Kayser, 2574 Dahl Avenue, Maplewood, addressed the council. He spoke regarding Mr. Bruce N d nU (d Of 8. Red B 186 B kvi whether Maplewood had a privacy ding particular concerned him. H8 also brought ongoing up an has had with his neighbors' wsnow removal methods and heasked what he about this ongoing problem. City Attorney, Alan K8nLrUd offered his business to Mr. Bronson ao the issues could be discussed privately. 0. Dave Schilling, addressed the council. He spoke regarding current and future council members being elected. Ferndale/Geranium Street Improvements, City Project 07-14 a. Assessment Hearing 7:15 p.m. b. Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll C. Resolution Awarding Construction Contract a. Public Works Director, ChVCk/\hi introduced the d8nn. b. Assistant City Engineer, Erin Laberee, presented the report. August 27.2007 City Council Meeting 3 Mayor Longrie opened the public hearing and the following individuals spoke: (1) Mary Jane Schuler, 2048 Geranium Ave E, Maplewood, addressed the council regarding her objection k]the Ferndale/Geranium |rnpnJv8n1RntS. She complimented the Public Works GL8ff for their good work. C2\ Richard Gilbert, 1140 Glendon St, Maplewood, addressed the council. He questioned hOvv assessments were estimated in K88p|evvOod. He also asked about the lighting in the park and having o rainwater garden. (3) lDrn Kennedy, 1134 Glendon St N, Maplewood, addressed the council about the natural spring that was capped in the park. He asked if there would be increased parking added for the park. He thanked the Public Works staff for 8 Q|D8 job done on this project. /4\ Nelson GSrb8O Geranium, Maplewood, addressed the council. His well was failing iD May of 2007 so he called the Public Works Department asking if there would be any chance of connecting to the city utilities and was told no so he spent $9,000 on a new well and now this project comes Up. He is not interested in paying to connect to the city utilities after he spent money on a new well. He would like the person that owns the property to pay for this. (The Mayor added that this project was planned for 2008 and the project was moved up.) (5) council. She said she was |d the assessment would assessment cost was too high. (0) Nancy White 2532 Rose Ave E.. Maplewood didn't address the council. Instead she handed her Laberee. Ms. White felt 30 days wasn't enough time to allow her k} pay assessment.N Mayor Longrie Closed the public hearing. COUnd|0e0b8[C RESOLUTION 07-08-148 ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council 0O July 23Pd for a Public Hearing, the assessment roll for the Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-14, was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, due toclerical errors in the previously accepted assessment roll, the following changes were necessary, and the assessment roll shall b9 amended @Sfollows: 1. Parcel |[}25282211O033-1122 Ferndale Street N— Changed h: two residential units from one due to the ability for the lot tObe split (+$3.70O); also added fees for sanitary and water service extensions to proposed lot-split (+$9,460). Total Assessment changed from $3,700 to $16,860. August 27.2OO7 City Council Meeting 4 2. Parcel ID 252922120188 — 2563 Geranium Avenue E — Changed to two residential units from one due to the unit being a duplex ( +$3,700). Total assessment changed from $3,700 to $7,400. 3. Parcel ID 252922140001 — 2627 Stillwater Road — Changed from a full street reconstruction rate to a partial street reconstruction rate (- $5,394.40). Total assessment changed from $21,526.40 to $16,132. 4. Parcel ID 2529221 1 0035 — 2637 Stillwater Road — Changed from a full street reconstruction rate to a partial street reconstruction rate (- $2,376.80). Total assessment changed from $10,812.80 to $8,436. 5. Parcel ID 252922110031 — 2638 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. 6. Parcel ID 252922110029 — 2648 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. 7. Parcel ID 2529221 1 0030 — 2648 Geranium Avenue -Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. 8. Parcel ID 252922110016 — 2637 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9 9. Parcel ID 252922110017 — 2645 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. 10. Parcel ID 252922110018 - 2657 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $2,460.00). Total assessment changed from $29,640 to $27,180. 11. Parcel ID 252922110028 — 2666 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. 12. Parcel ID 252922110027 — 2674 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. 13. Parcel ID 2529221 1 0026 — 2682 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. 14. Parcel ID 252922110019 — 2683 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 5 15. Parcel ID 252922110020 — 2691 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. 16. Parcel ID 252922110025 — 2692 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. 17. Parcel ID 2529221 1 0024 — 2700 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. 18. Parcel ID 252922110021 — 2701 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. 19. Parcel ID 252922110060 — 2707 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous payment of a storm sewer assessment (- $820.00). Total assessment changed from $9,880 to $9,060. And, WHEREAS, the following property owners have filed objections to their assessments according to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows: a. Parcel 252922130065 — Richard and Virginia Weinhold; 2615 Stillwater Road Mr. and Mrs. Weinhold obiect to the assessment based upon a senior citizen financial b. C. d. Nancy Whig of f. Parcel 2529221 Ms. Hansen any g. Parcel 2529221 Mr. and Mrs. Sc h. Parcel 2529221 Mr. and Mrs. Sr hardship. Parcel 252922120016 Mr. Nickolaus and Mr. Jc Parcel 252922120037 i Nickolaus and Keith Johnson; 1146 Evar Street on object to the assessment based upon financial hardship. ra Linroth; 2530 Rose Avenue -ts to the assessment based upon paying too much for taxes. 028 — Margaret Ferguson 2512 Rose Avenue objects to the assessment based upon living in a town home. 024 — Nancy L. White; 2532 Rose Avenue As to the assessment based upon a financial hardship. 018 — Sharon Hansen and Edward Rang; 2657 Geranium Avenue 1r. Rang object to the assessment based upon unbuildable lots. 029 — Mary Jane and Larry Schuler; 2648 Geranium Avenue ler object to the assessment based upon an unbuildable lot. 030 — Mary Jane and Larry Schuler; 2648 Geranium Avenue ler object to the assessment based upon not wanting to connect to City Laura Lin Parcel 2E irgaret rergu reel 2529221 water at this time. Parcel 2529221 1 0035 — Robert Doane; 2637 Stillwater Road Mr. Doane objects to the assessment based upon a financial hardship. Parcel 252922110031 — Nelson J. Gerben, Jr.; 2638 Geranium Avenue Mr. Gerben objects to the assessment based upon not wanting to connect to City water at this time. August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 6 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOO1 1. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed t0 review the objections received and report to the City Council at the regular meeting on September 10, 2007, as to their recommendations for adjustments. 2. The assessment roll for the Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements as amended, without those property owners' assessments that have filed objections, a copy of which is attached hereto and made 8 part hereof, is hereby adopted. Said assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 3. Such assessments shall bS payable iO equal annual installments extending over 8 period Of15 years, the first installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2008 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.0 percent per annum for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest Qnthe entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,2UOy. To each subsequent installment when due shall b8 added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 4. The of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, but no later than October 1, 2007, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the city clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time after October 1, 2007, pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 5. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after October 1 but D0 later than November 15,2O07, transmit o certified duplicate Of this assessment hJ the county auditor tObRextended on the property tax lists ofthe county. Such assessments shall b8 collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the council on this 27 th day Vf August 2O0Y. Seconded by{|oUnci|memberJU8n8m8nn. Ayes —All August 27.2OO7 City Council Meeting 7 Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the Resolution Awarding the Construction Contract to T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc., for $1,475,929.16 for the Ferndale/Geranium Street Improvements, City Proiect 07-14. AWARD OF BIDS RESOLUTION 07-08-149 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of T.A. Schifsky and Sons Inc., in the amount of $1,475,929.16 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements —City Project 07-14, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. Adopted by the council on this 27 day Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. ust 2007 s — Councilmembers; Cave, le, Juenemann, Rossbach Nay- Mayor Longrie August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 8 2' Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-15 8. Assessment Hearing 7:15p.nn. b. Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll C. Resolution Authorizing the Installation Of Burke Avenue Cu|-DG-S8C based On Resident Petition Request d. Resolution Awarding Construction Contract a. Assistant City Engineer, Erin L8benae. presented the report. Mayor Longrie opened the public hearing and the following individuals spoke: M\ Ralph Re|ler,1734 Lark Ave. E, Maplewood, addressed the council. (2) T0no Zanga, 1771 Burke Ave. E.. Mop|evvO0d. addressed the council. He is opposed tnthe project. His concerns were drainage and snow removal from the site. /3\ Joe F|ennin0, 2271 White Bear Av8.. K88p|8vvV&d. He owns Fleming Auto and objected tV being assessed OD three sides Of his commercial property. /4\ VVi||GPd Fr8Dz, 1750 Burke Ave. E., Maplewood. He disagreed with Mr. /\h|'S traffic count assessment of 5O0 cars 8 day. He estimated 50 cars 8 day. He disagreed with the report. (5) Terry Nadler, 1706 Sandhurst Ave. E., Maplewood. He asked if the width of Sandhurst Avenue would be increased or decreased with this project. Mayor Longrie closed the public hearing. Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll for the Lark/ProsperitV Area Street Improvements, CitV Project 07-15. RESOLUTION 07-08-150 ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on July 23rd, 2007, calling for a Public Hearing, the assessment roll for the Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-15, was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, due to a clerical error in the previously accepted assessment roll, the following changes were necessary, and the assessment roll shall be amended as follows: a. Parcel ID 102922430044— 1655 County Road 8E —This property was inadvertently omitted f0 assessment roll. This property has 8 main driveway off of Kennard Street and Gh0V|d be 8sG8Gs8d in order to treat all properties equally. Total Assessment is $4,960. And, WHEREAS, the following property owners have filed objections LO their assessments according to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows: o. Parcel 10.29.22.44.U{27—Robert F. Parsons; 2229 Prosperity Road Mr. Parsons objects to the assessment based upon senior citizen financial hardship. b. Parcel 10.20.2244.UO50— Dorothy S|evo;108O Lark Avenue Mrs. Sleva objects to the assessment based upon senior citizen financial hardship. August 27.2OO7 City Council Meeting 9 C. Parcel 11.2B.22.33.0001—Joe Fleming; 2271White Bear Avenue K8c Fleming objects to the 8Ss8sSnn8nt 8nnVVnL U8S9d upon the Us8N8 Lark Ave front NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL {)FMAPLEVVOC)O. MINNESOTA: That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to review the objections received and report bJ the City Council ot the regular meeting On September 1U.20O7 recommendations for adjustments. 2. The assessment roll for the Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements as amended, without those property owners' assessments that have filed objections, 8 copy [d which iSattached hereto and made 8 part hereof, iS hereby adopted. Said assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 3. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first installments t0b8payable onor before the first Monday in January 2UO8 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.0 percent per annum for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest onthe entire assessment from the date nf this resolution until December 31,2UUy. To each subsequent installment when due shall bR added interest for one year OQ all unpaid installments. 4. The owner of any property S0 assessed may, 8t any time prior to certification 0fthe assessment to the county auditor, but no later than October 1, 2007, pay the whole of the assessment Un such property, with interest accrued LO the date Of the payment, k} the city clerk, except th8tDointere8tsh@||bSCh8[g9difth8SDtinR8SS8Sa[nRDtisp8idvvithiD30d8yS from the adoption Of this resolution; and they noGy' at any time after October 1 2007. pay to the county auditor the entire amount gf the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 5. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after October 1, 2007, but no later than November 15, 2007, transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists 0f the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted bV the council OD this 27 th day Of August 20O7. Seconded bvCound|member0elle. Avey — A|| August 27,2O07 City Council Meeting 10 Cou0ci|memberJu8nemann moved to table the Resolution Authorizing the Installation of Burke Avenue Cul-De-Sa,c based on Resident Petition Request for the Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Pro'ect 07-15. Further, staff is instructed to conduct a traffic study of the volume of traffic on the roadway, investigate the drainage concerns of the residents, investigate other turn restriction options at the White Bear Avenue-Burke Avenue intersection and then re-survey the affected residents along Burke Avenue to determine the support of the Cul-De-Sac and other options proposals. Mr. AN indicated that staff would attempt to complete this prior to the end of September 2007. Seconded by Councilmember Cave. A CounCi|nl8nnb8rRVgSbaCh Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. The motion failed. COUnCi|[Dembers; HjEd|e, Rossbach Mayor Lonoh8,Counci|mRmb8rs )dJUHn8nn8nn COUnC|nlenlb8[Juenenlann moved to approve the resolution awarding the Construction Contract for the Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Proiect 07-15 including Bid Alternates 1, 2, 3, and 5 rincluding the Public Works, City Hall and MCC parking lotsl as recommended by the RESOLUTION 07-08-151 AWARD OF BUDS NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OFN1APLEVV0{}O MINNESOTA, that the bid ofT.A,Sohifakv& Sons, Inc. in the amount Of$2 includes Bid Alternates 1, 2, 3, and 5, is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements —City Project O7-15 authorized and directed to enter into 8 contract with said bidder for and On behalf 0fthe city. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. Adopted by the council on this 27 th day of August 200Y. Counci|mambnr Cave seconded. Aves — Comnci|mnmbemCave. Nays - Mayor Longrie August 27,2OO7 City Council Meeting 11 3. City Code Amendment — Planning Commission First Reading 7:30 p.m. a. Planner, Ken Roberts presented the report. b. Jeremy Yarwood from the Planning Commission gave a report. Councilmember Cave moved to approve the First Reading of the Proposed code amendment. This amendment chanaes Sections 2-246 throuah 2-255 of the code about the Diannina commission. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes — All The council took a 5- minute recess at 9:50 p.m. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt consent agenda items 2, 3, & 7. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes- All Mayor Longrie moved to adopt consent agenda item 1. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Councilmember Juenemann Seconded by yes- All as- All as- All Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt consent agenda items 9. Seconded by Councilmember Cave. Ayes- All August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 12 Approva of Claims. Mayor Longh8 moved approval OfClaims. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: � -------- No accounts payable checks were processed during this report period. � 109.324.80 Disbursements via debits h3 checking account Dated 08/02/07 thnJ 08/09/07 � 1.322.825.54 Checks #Y3312thnJ#7 Dated 08/07/07 thru 08, $ 324.20113 Disbursements via debits to checking @CCOUDt Dated 08/10/07 thru 08/16/07 $ 1.810 Total Accounts Payable I LT ETC one � 511,623.81 Pa C and Direct Deposits dated U8/1O/07 $ 2,824.27 Payro Deduction check #10O2820 thru #1002822 [)8t8d 08/10/87 ...... .. ..... $ 514L248.08 Total Payroll .... .... .... .... GRAND TOTAL Seconded byCOUnCiknen]barH�lb). Aves - AJ| 2. City Ordinance Update - KBuiUding Codes. Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following code updates to Section 12-39 (b)(3) of the city code. These changes are necessary Ln make the city code consistent with the optional parts Of the recently enacted State Building Code for use in the City Of Maplewood. (The old language is crossed out and the new language iGUndedin8d\: ^ A. Option 1305 EXGavatieR and Grading: 2002 QG SypplemeRt AppeRd K 2008 IBC Appendix J . (This gives niUna regulations in the building code about grading) ^ B. Option 13OG.O02OSubpart 3, Option #1 #2 Existing & New Buildings Special Fire Protection System: (This e||ovvs the city to require fine sprinkler systems in all assembly occupancies except for open stadiums. This also allows the city to require fire sprinkler systems in spaces with a smaller floor area than the building code would require.) August 27,2O07 City Council Meeting 13 Existing option 1335 Flood Proofing Regulation. This does not allow buildings to be built in a flood plain zone and allows the inspectors to require drain the and damp proofing for dwellings. The City of Maplewood has this provision in its current ordinance. The state made no changes to this option in 2007. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes - All 3. Conditional Use Permit Review — Liberty Classical Acade Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Conditio Classical Academy at 1717 English Street and review the C Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. 4. Conditional Use Permit Review — Councilmember Juenemann moved to api 717 English Street. rmit Review for Liberty i one year. Ayes — All san 309 61 North. RT council in three months and if necessary the Manager of Kline Nissan shall appear before the city council. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes - All 5. Authorization to Purchase Total Station for Engineering Services Program. Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the purchase of the Total Station and required components from Frontier Precision in the amount of $15,124.07 and authorize the City Engineer to make the necessary fund transfers. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes - All 6. Approval of Developer's Agreement for Walgreen's at White Bear Avenue and Beam Avenue, City Project 04-37. a. Public Works Director, Chuck Ahl gave the report. Mayor Longrie moved to approve the Developer's Agreement for Walgreen's at White Bear Avenue and Beam Avenue, City Proiect 04-37. August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 14 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Ramsey County, Minnesota Development Agreement for Walgreen's at Beam Avenue and White Bear Avenue THIS AGREEMENT, made this 27Lh day 0f August, 20OY. between the City of Maplewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation, acting by and through its mayor and city manager, herein called the CITY, VV.B.-BeGm.LLC. @ k8inn8SOt@ Limited Liability Company hSpRiO C@USd the OWNER and Meer Construction, Inc. 8 K8inn8SOL8 Corporation, herein t8||8d the DEVELOPER. |N CONSIDERATION nf the following mutual agreements and covenants, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. |n consideration oJ the CITY accepting development, the DEVELOPER shall provide all internal water systems, storm water management f8d|itie8, sanitary sewers and street improvements, as specified herein the Special Conditi improvements con. improvements and private improverne owner of the prope obligations necess 2. The DEVELOPER cations attached to this contract. All internal by the D intained by the DEVELOPER or their assign. The exception to the the sidewalk along Beam Ave. The OWNER warrants that he is the construct the said improvements. agrees 10 provide 8 cash escrow in the form of cash deposit for the curb and gutter, signing, landscaping and other improvements ce with current City standards, more specifically outlined in R shall be considered private utilities and/or for the construction of Walgreen's and maintains all rights and construction of sidewalk along Beam Avenue. The City shall construct this sidewalk when the White Bear Avenue Street Improvements are constructed in 2008. The cash escrow shall be in the amount of $9,000. August 27,2O07 City Council Meeting 15 3. The OWNER agrees bD dedicate 8tDo cost to the city, 1O feet of right 8vv8ysdOngVVhihe Bear Avenue for the future reconstruction of White Bear Avenue in 2008 as specifically shown on the plan attached hereto 8G Exhibit A. 4. The OWNER agrees toexecute, prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, o maintenance agreement establishing the maintenance requirements and responsibilities for the storm sewer treatment structures. 5. Cash escrow shall be letter of credit or cash deposit. If the surety is in the form of a letter of credit, the letter ofcredit must clearly indicate n irrevocable | 8 financial institution approved by the City Attorney) in the name of the City of Maplewood, payable On demand, to assure compliance with the terms of this developer's agreement. The letter 0f credit shall be of a one-year duration and must h with notification to the CITY a minimum of 60days prior to its expiration. 6. The DEVELOPER shall complete the public works improvements, if any, covered by this agreement bvno later than April 3U NO deviation from the required completion date shall be permitted unless approved in writing by the CITY. After receipt of written notice from the DEVELOPER df the existence of causes over which the DEVELOPER has nO control which will delay the oo[np|8ti0O of the vv0rk. the CITY, at its discretion, may extend the C0nlp|8ti0n date and any financial sureties required shall be continued t0 cover the work during the extension oftime. 7. The DEVELOPER shall furnish all engineering, architectural and administrative services for the private improvements and building projects. 8. The DEVELOPER agrees that the work shall be done and performed in the best and most workmanlike manner; and all materials and labor shall be in strict conformity with respect to the approved Plans and Specifications and improvement standards of the City of Maplewood, and shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the CITY or a duly authorized engineer of the CITY; and in case any material or labor supplied shall be rejected by the CITY or engineer as August 27,2O07 City Council Meeting 16 defective 0r unsuitable, then such rejected material shall be removed and replaced with approved material to the satisfaction and approval of the CITY or engineer and at the sole cost and expense of the DEVELOPER. B. After completion of any private work required by the DEVELOPER within public i or easements, the City engineer or the City engineer's representative of the []EVEL{)PER'n engineer will make provision shall apply only ho work within public right not inspect or warrant any private work cond 10. It is further agreed, anything to the contrary City Council and its agents or employees shall not manner to the OWNER, DEVELOPER, the DEVELOPE or subcontractor, material suppliers, laborers or to any other person or persons whomsoever, for any claim, demand, damages, actions or causes of action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the execution of this agreement or the performance and completion of the work or the improvements provided herein, which the DEVELOPER will save the CITY harmless from all such claims, demands, damages, actions or causes of action or the costs disbursements and expenses of defending the same, specifically including, without intending to limit the categories of said costs, cost and expenses for CITY administrative time and labor, costs of consulting engineering services, and costs of legal services rendered in connection with the defending such claims as may be brought against the CITY. It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER will furnish the City of Maplewood proof of insurance in the amount as required by the approval specifications covering any public liability or property damage by reason of the operation of the DEVELOPER's equipment, laborers, and hazard caused by said improvement. ated representative and ltnal inspection nf the work. This or easements. The City engineer will e contractor Orcontractors hired by the ing. that the City of Maplewood On@k/ liable O[ responsible iOany August 27,2O07 City Council Meeting 17 11. Breach of any terms of this agreement by the DEVELOPER shall be grounds for denial of building or occupancy permits for the Walgreen's building until the DEVELOPER corrects such breach. 12. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions contained herein and any other application thereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. -, 13. The terms and conditions of this agreement shall be binding on the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns 8ndUle benefits and burdens shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. In the event that this agreement is recorded, the CITY, DEVELOPER and OWNER hereby agree to execute and record a termination of this agreement upon issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 14. Notices. Whenever it shall be required or permitted by this Agreement that notice or demand be given or served by either party to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the addresses hereinafter set forth by certified mail. Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when ccordance with the at )ws, until written notic )f Maplewood County Road BEast evvnod 55109 W.B. —Be@nn. LLC The addresses of the parties hereto for such of such address has been given: C/O Semper Development, Ltd 80 South Eight Street Suite 1275 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 August 27,2O07 City Council Meeting iN deposited in the mail in TITLE STATE OFMINNESOTA \no. COUNTY (JFHENNEP|N) The foregoing instrument wac August, 2OO7 of the Owner. SIGNATURES FOR DEVELOPER yNEER CONSTRUCTDN BY TITLE ��~~ � STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS. COUNTY (JFRAK8SEY \ The foregoing instrument was oCkD0vv|8dg8d b9hJPS [nS this August, 2087 the of the Owner. Notary Public day of August 27,2O07 City Council Meeting 19 SIGNATURES CITY OF MAPLEWOOD: Diana Longrie, Mayor STATE [)F MINNESOTA) ms. COUNTY OF RAM8EY\ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2007, by Diana Longrie, Mayor, of the Maplewood, 8 [nuOi[jpG| corporation. ~� ...... Notary Public �......� .......... _ ... ..... ....... ....... SIGNATURES CITY OF MAPLEWOOD: Greg Copeland, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged befo me this day of , 2007, by Greg Copeland, City Manager, of the City of ZMEMEM August 27,2OO7 City Council Meeting 20 SPECIAL CONDITIONS Am 6*111 - .0] LVA 601 Lei 0 1 Q :0511:1 we] CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1. Project Information: a. Name: Walgreen's b. Developer: W.B. — Beam, LLC C. Engineer: Plowe Engineering d. General Contractor: Meer Construction e. Financial Guarantees: (1) Type: Cash Escrow (Sidewalk along Beam Avenue) Amount: $9,000 2. Scope of work contemplated under the terms of this contract and covered by ons of development approval from city council meeting (see attached minutes). August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 21 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL l2OP.K8. Monday, December 11 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. O8-33 New Business 2. VVa ' (Northeast Corner of White Bear and Beam Lot Division Land Use Plan Amendment (LBCL0BC) Zoning Map Change (LBCk}BC) Design Review 8. Planner Finwall presented th _ -_'n Kohler, Architect, Semper Devi C. Matt Reagan, Construction Manager |SSuRS. d. Scott Reagan, Meer Construction, — Commissioner _'Grover, representing the Planning Commission report. Mayor Longrie on code reauirements rm questions. Planning Commission, presented IN 8. Submit a revised survey b] staff for approval which shows the following: 1) Legal descriptions Of Parcels A and B. 2\ Location and legal description of a utility and access easement on the east side of Parcel A to accommodate utilities and access for the property to the north (2S5U White Bear Avenue) and access for the property to the east (Parcel B). 3\ Location and legal description of8n access easement on the north side [f Parcel A and the south side 0f the property tO the north /295U White Bear Avenue) tV accommodate the driveway located On the north side Vfthe VVa|gFe8n's' building and the shared curb cut oOWhite Bear Avenue. 4\ Location and legal description [f8t8n-foot-vvid8 roadway easement along White Bear Avenue the entire length of Parcel A to accommodate for future roadway widening. b. Deeds describing the two new legal descriptions for Parcels A and B, including the required utility, access, and roadway easement descriptions described above. C. Deeds must be recorded with Ramsey County within one year of the date of lot division approval or the lot division will become null and void (city code requirement). )nl8nt,vv8S present 8Hr Construction, |nc, addressed sidewalk August 27,2O07 City Council Meeting 22 d. Prior to issuance 0f8 grading or building permit for the proposed \A/o|green'S retail store and pharmacy on Parcel A. the following must be submitted to staff for 1) Proof that Ramsey County has recorded the deeds. 2\ A signed certificate of survey for Parcel A showing the location of all property lines, building, parking, driveway, freestanding sign, and easements. Seconded bvCoUnCi|mennb8rCave COUnC|nl8nlb8rR0sSb@Ch Ayes-All Avenues from Limited Busin , following LBC) to BL COMPREHENSIVE RESOLUTI PLAN CHANGE sm WHEREAS, Semper Development, the city's comprehensive land use plan from Limited Business Commercial (LBC) to Business Commercial (BC). WHEREAS, thichange applies oz the west 2cm feet cx the vacant property located Vnthe northeast corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues (Parcel A as described in the October 5, 2006, Lot Split Boundary Exhibit). WHEREAS, WHEREAS, the legal description of Parcel A is as follows: That part of the South 284.96 feet of the South 731.5 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29 North, Range 22 lying East of the center line of White Bear Avenue, Except the part thereof described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, said point being 175 feet Northerly of the South line of said Southeast Quarter; thence Northerly 556.5 feet along the East line; thence 354.5 feet due West; 35O feet due South; thence in8 Southeasterly direction LO8 point which i8 120 feet due West of the point of beginning; thence Northwesterly along last said line 166.75 feet [0 the north line 0f the said South 284.08 feet; thence along last said north line, South 88 degrees 19 minutes O5 seconds West @ distance 0f94.73 feet; thence deflecting left 90 degrees, South OO degrees 4O minutes 55 seconds East 8 distance Vf284.S8 feet tO the east /west quarter line of said Section 2; thence along said east /west quarter line, North 89 August 27.2OO7 City Council Meeting 23 degrees 18minutes 05 seconds East to the center of said Section 2; thence northerly along the East line [f the Southeast Quarter Vf the Northwest Quarter [f said Sect 2adistance of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning; according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota. FJ Subject to the right of way for Beam Avenue and White Bear Avenue and encumbrances as shown on an ALTA survey prepared by Houston Engineering dated March 24, 2006. Containing approximately 67,013 square feet. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: (Jn November 20,2OO8, the planning commission held 8 public hear The city staff published @ hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices t0 the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone 8L the hearing 8 chance k}speak and present written statements prior to their recommendation. On December 11, 2006, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE RESOLVED that the city council approved the above- described ohangetothe|8n for the following reasons: 4 n���'m 3. Promote economic development that will expand the property tax base, increase jobs and provide desirable services. 4. Minimize the land planned for streets. 5. Minimize conflicts between land uses. 6. Prevent premature use, overcrowding, or overuse of land especially when supportive services and facilities, such as utilities, drainage systems, or streets are not available. 7. Help to implement the goals of the comprehensive plan including: 1. Pr8v�8for ordHdwd evelopment. � n'-,--.--�-~----u--- ---�-_�_����~ The city will not approve new developme without providing for adequate facilities and services, such as street, utilities, drainage, parks, and open b) Safe and adequate access will be provided for all properties. C) Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic, social, or physical impact on adjoining developments. d) Whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar uses front on the same street or at borders of areas separated by major man- made or natural barriers. e) The city coordinates land use changes with the character of each nei fl Group compat businesses in suitable areas. Ayes-Al g) Avoid disruption of adjacent or nearby residential areas. Seconded by Councilmember Cave August 27,2O07 City Council Meeting 24 Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following resolution approve the zoning map change for the newly subdivided 1.54 acre western lot (Parcel A) on the vacant lot located on the northeast corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues from Limited Business Commercial (LBC) to Business Commercial (BC): ZONING MAP CHANGE RESOLUTION 06-12-154 WHEREAS, Semper Development, representing Walgreen's, applied for a change to the city's zoning map from Limited Business Commercial (LBC) to Business Commercial (BC). WHEREAS, this change applies to the west 253 feet of the vacant property located on the northeast corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues (Parcel A as described in the October 5, 2006, Lot Split Boundary Exhibit). WHEREAS, the property identification number for the property is 02-29-22-24-0004. WHEREAS, the legal description for Parcel A is as follows: That part of the South 284.96 feet of the South 731.5 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29 North, Range 22 lying East of the center line of White Bear Avenue, Except the part thereof described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, said point being 175 feet Northerly of the South line of said Southeast Quarter; thence Northerly 55O.5feet along the East line; thence 354.5 feet due West; thence 350feet due South; thence in a Southeasterly direction toa point which is 12O feet due West ofthe point of beginning; thence Northwesterly along last said line 166.75 feet to the north line of the said South 2d4.98 feet; thence along last said north line, South 8S degrees 10minutes 05 seconds West $ distance of 94.73 R$nt ih8nC8 deflecting left 88 d8gr88S. South UO degrees 4D minutes 55 seconds East o distance Of284.9G feet to the east / west quarter line of said Section 2; thence along said east /west quarter line, North 89 degrees 19 minutes 05 seconds East to the center of said Section 2; thence northerly along the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter Vf said Section 3a distance of1Y5.UU feet tothe point Qfbeginning; according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Subject to the right of way for Beam Avenue and White Bear Avenue and encumbrances as shown on an ALTA survey prepared by Houston Engineering dated March 24, 2006. Containing approximately 67,013 square feet. August Z7,2OO7 City Council Meeting 25 WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1 (]n November 20 the planning commission held G public hearing. The city staff published a hearing not in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone aL the hearing a chance tVspeak and present written statements prior tO their recommendation. 2. {)n December 11,2008, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOVV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described change in the zon map for the follow 1 Th— ,r-,---- --n — ---- --n _ The p c neighboring property the use Cx the property di included in change 0r plan iS adequately safeguarded. 3. Th community, where applicable, � ' The proposed change would h ' economical extension of public police and fire protection, and E o negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and ces and facilities, such as public water, sewers, conveniences 0fthe ave rie a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. b. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant must submit to staff for approval the following items: 1\ Revised grading/drainage/ut plans which comply with all city engineering department [8qUinamSDtS GS specified in the November 20, 2000, 8DgiD89hn0 report including, but not limited to, the granting Uf8right-0f-w8y easement along White Bear Avenue and the submittal of an escrow to the city to ensure construction of a six-foot- wide sidewalk along the length of Beam Avenue adjacent Walgreen's development to Ue complete by the city in2008. August 27,2OO7 City Council Meeting 26 2) Rev site plan show a bike rack to be located near the building entrance. 3\ A rev li 8ndohntVnl8LhCp|anvvhichshovv8Lh8Lih8overBUiUVnnin8Uonfn]m outdoor lights does not exceed 4-foot-candles at all pnUpRhv lines. 4\ Obtain 8 permit from Ramsey County for construction oncounty ri for the driveway access, utility work, and sidewalk. 5) Watershed district approval if revisions warrant 8new review. 8\ Ac8Gh eScnJvv or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be15U percent of the cost of the work. C. 5ign8Q8on the property ispart of the design review approval and is subject tO the following sign criteria: 1) One freestanding sign LVb8 located 0n the corner [f Beam and White Bear Avenue. Freestanding Sign to be maximum of 15 feet in height. 80 square feet in area, maintain 8 10-fOot setback toall property lines and comply with traffic visibility requirements. 2) Two Walgreen's wall signs to be located on the south and west elevation. Signs to be constructed [f individual must be centered within the manufactured limestone facade. 3\ Two one-hour photo signs and two pharmacy signs to b8 located on the south and west elevation. Signs to be constructed Of individual letters with 8 maximum letter height of 1.5 [8 nnUsL be centered within the rn8nUfa[tUn8d |inn8sLon8 piers. above the windows. � 4) One drive-through pharmacy directiona si tVbe|VCat8d8boveth8gtandingseann metal roof on the south elevation. Sign to be constructed of individual letters with a maximum letter height of 1.5 feet. 5) One interior entrance tower neon sign, 22 square feet in area. d. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: 1 ) Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. 2) Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. 3) Install all required landscaping and underground irrigation. 4) Screen the rooftop mechanical equipment. 5) Install all required outdoor li August 27,2OO7 City Council Meeting 27 a [ If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: 1) The city determines that the work iS not essential tO the public health, safety Or 2\ The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1if occupancy of the building iSin the fall 0r winter, Or within six weeks Of occupancy of the building if occupancy iSin the spring or summer. All work shall follow the approved plans. The di approve minor changes. COm development may Seconded bvCound|mernberRosabaoh. Ayes-All August 27,2OO7 City Council Meeting 28 7. Mogren Street Improvements, City Project 06-17, Resolution Approving Cooperative Agreement with MnDOT for Signal Reimbursement Expenses. Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the execution of Cooperative Agreement No. 91575 for the reimbursement of expenses by the State for the traffic signal system revision and associated construction in coniunction with the Mogren Street Improvements, CitV Project 06-17, Resolution ADDrovina Cooperative Aareement with MnDOT for Signal Reimbursement Exoenses. RESOLUTION 07-08-152 IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter into Mn/DOT Agreement No. 91575 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To provide for payment by the State to the City of Maplewood for the State's share of the costs of the traffic control signal and interconnect construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 61 at Beam Avenue within the corporate City limits under State Project No. 6222-159 (T. H. 61 =001). IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement, Ayes - All August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 29 PRE - LETTING STATE OF MINNESOTA SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECTION COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION The State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, .AMOUNT RECEIVABLE (None) Mn /DOT AGREEMENT NO. 91575 S.P. 6222 -159 (T.H. 61 =001) S.A.P. 138 - 020 -032 S.A.P. 138 -122 -002 C.P. 06 -17 State Funds ORIGINAL and .AMOUNT ENCUMBERED $122,593.50 (FY 2011) August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 30 91575 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into bv and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State" and the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City". August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 31 91575 WHEREAS, the City is about to perform grading, aggregate base, bituminous surfacing, concrete curb and gutter, concrete walk, utilities, storm sewer and traffic signal improvements construction and other associated construction upon, along and adjacent to Beam Avenue (C.S.A.H. 19) from Trunk Highway No. 61/Maplewood Drive to the BNSF Railroad bridge and on Beam Avenue (C.S.A.H. 19) from Trunk Highway No. 61/Maplewood Drive to Duluth Street within the corporate City limits in accordance with City-prepared plans, specifications and special provisions designated by the City as City Project 06-17 and by the State as State Project No. 6222-159 (T.H. 61=001) and S.A.P No's. 138-020-032, 138-122-002; and WHEREAS, the City has requested participation by the State in the costs of the traffic control signal system "C" and interconnect construction; and WHEREAS, the State is willing to participate in the costs of the traffic control signal system "C" and interconnect construction which includes the Sta construction nished Materials and associated amount as hereinafter set forth; and the State is willing to pay the City, it can pay e traffic control signal system "C" and on have been encumbered, which encumbrance must be ion of such funds by the Minnesota Legislature; appropriati 3 construction is currently part of the State's 2011 onstruction program, and the State will seek the unds, and encumber the funds, if available; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system. August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 32 IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I - CONSTRUCTION BY THE CITY Section A. Contract Award and Construction 91575 The City did receive bids and has awarded a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder in accordance with State-approved City plans, specifications and special provisions designated by the City as City Project No. 06-17 and by the State as State Project No. 6222-159 (T.H. 61=001). Execution of this Agreement shall constitute concurrence by the State in that award. The contract construction shall be performed in accordance with State-approved City plans, specifications and special provisions that are on file in the office of the City's Engineer, and are incorporated into this Agreement by reference. Section B. Direction, Supervision and inspection of Construction The contract construction shall be under the direction of the City and under the supervision of a registered professional engineer; however, the State cost participation construction covered under this Agreement shall be open to inspection by the State District Engineer's authorized representatives. Responsibility for the control of materials for the State cost participation construction covered under this Agreement shall be on the City and its contractor and shall be carried out in accordance with Specifications No. 1601 through and including No. 1609 as set forth in the State's current "Standard Specifications for Construction". Section C The City s !tion of Construction e the contract construction to be started and completed in accordance with the time schedule in the construction contract special provisions. The completion date for the contract construction may be extended, by an exchange of letters between the appropriate City official and the State District Engineer's authorized representative, for unavoidable delays encountered in the performance thereof. August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 33 91575 Section D. Additional Construction, Plan Changes, Etc. The State shall not participate in the cost of any contract construction that is in addition to the State cost participation construction covered under this Agreement unless the necessary State funds have been encumbered and the terms and conditions in the following paragraph have been met. All changes in the plans, specifications and special provisions for the State cost participation construction covered under this Agreement and all addenda, change orders and supplemental agreements entered into by the City and its contractor for State cost participation construction covered under this Agreement must be approved in writing by the State District Engineer's authorized representative before therefore. Section E. Compliance with Laws nt is made by the State and Reaulations The City shall, in connection with the award and administration of the construction contract and the performance of the contract construction, comply and cause its contractor to comply with all Federal, State and Local laws, and all applicable ordinances and regulations. Section F. Construction Engineering Costs The State shall pay a construction engineering charge in an amount equal to 8 percent of the total cost of the State participation construction covered under this Agreement. Section G. Addenda, Change Orders and Supplemental Agreements The State shall share in the costs of construction contract addenda, change orders and supplemental agreements that are necessary to complete the State cost participation construction covered under this Agreement and that have been approved in writing by the State District Engineer's authorized representative. August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 34 ARTICLE 11 - PAYMENT BY THE STATE 91575 The State shall pay to the City, as the State's full and complete share of the costs of the traffic control signal system "C" and interconnect construction, the State's share of state furnished materials and associated construction engineering to be performed upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 61 at Beam Avenue within the corporate City limits under State Project No. 6222-159 (T.H. 61=001), a lump sum in the amount of $122,593.50. After the following conditions have been met, the State shall pay to the City the State's full and complete lump sum cost share: 1. Execution and approval of this Agreement and the State's transmittal of it to the City. 2. Receipt by the State from the City of certified documentation for all of the right-of-way and easement acquisition required for State cost participation construction covered under this Agreement. 3. Legislative appropriation of funds for the State's road construction program. It is anticipated that payment by the State that depends on Legislative appropriation of funds will be made after July 1, 2010 and before June 30, 2011 for Fiscal Year 2011. 4. Encumbrance cost share, the 8 percen July 1, 2010 Receipt by t payment of f e State of the State's total estimated construction tate's share of the state furnished materials and struction engineering cost share, no earlier than a written request from the City for the LL PROVISIONS Section A. Maintenance and operation of signal system Upon completion of the traffic signal system "C", interconnect and EVP construction to be performed within the corporate City limits under the construction contract, the existing signal operation and maintenance agreement No. 74350 dated March 28, 1996 between the State, City and Ramsey County shall remain in full force and effect. August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 35 91575 Section B. Termination of Agreement Each party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by providing the other party with written or fax notice of effective date of termination. The State is not obligated to pay for services performed after notice and effective date of termination. Upon such termination, the City is entitled to payment for services satisfactorily performed under this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination. The State may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered under this Agreement. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the City. The State is not obligated to pay for services performed after notice and effective date of termination. Upon such termination, the City is entitled to payment for services satisfactorily performed under this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination, to the extent the funds are available. Section C. Examination of Books, Records, Etc. As provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 5, the books records, documents, and each party relevant to t party, and either the le appropriate, for a minim Section D. Claims nting procedures and practices of his Agreement are subject to examination by each lative auditor or the state auditor as f six years from final payment. Each party is responsible for its own employees for any claims arising under the Workers Compensation Act. Each party is responsible for its own acts, omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions of others and the results thereof. Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736 and other applicable law govern liability of the State. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and other applicable law govern liability of the City. August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 36 Section E. Nondiscrimination 91575 The provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 181.59 and of any applicable law relating to civil rights and discrimination shall be considered part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. Section F. Agreement Approval Before this Agreement becomes binding and effec by a City Council resolution and executed by as the law may provide in addition to the or their authorized representative. The State's Authorized Agent for t Agreement is Maryanne Kelly-Sonnek, successor. Her current address and phon Boulevard, Mailstop 682, St. Paul, n of this reements Engineer, or her er are 395 John Ireland The City's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director, or their successor. Their current address and phone number are 1902 County Road B East, Maplewood, MN 55109, (651) 249-2402. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement by their authorized officers. it shall be approved ate and City officers of Transportation August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 37 91575 STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. §§ 16A.15 and 160.05. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Recommended for approval: M Date MAPS Encumbrance No. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By Mayor ISM District Engineer Approved: By State Design Engineer Date Approved as to form and execution: By Contract Management )MMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION legated to Materials Management Division 19 late August 27, 2007 City Council Meeting 38 8. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MnReleaf Grant for Oak Wilt Disease Control. No action is needed for this item. 9. Temp-Seasonal-Casual Part-Time Pay Ranges for 2007. Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Temp-Seasonal-Casual Part-Time Pay Ranges for 2007 for these part-time non-benefit earning employees. RESOLUTION 07-08-153 WHEREAS, according to the Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations act, part- time employees who do not work more than 14 hour per week and temporary/seasonal employees who work in positions that do not exceed 67 days in a calendar year, or 100 days for full-time students, are not public employees and are therefore not eligible for membership in a public employee union. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following pay ranges and job classifications are hereby established for temporary/seasonal and casual part-time (14 hours or fewer/wk) employees effective upon approval. Accountant $10.00-30.00 per hour Accounting Technician $9.00-22.00 per hour Administrative Assistant $9.00-23.00 per hour Background Investigator $25.00-35.00 per hour Building Inspector $14.00-35.00 per hour Building Attendant $6.15-15.00 per hour Clerk $7.50-15.00 per hour Customer Service Assistant $6.15-15.00 per hour CSO $8.00-16.00 per hour IT Technician $15.00-20.00 per hour Laborer $6.50-14.00 per hour Lifeguard $6.15-14.00 per hour Manager on Duty Differential $1.00 per hour August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting 39 Election Pred a 4 IT Technician $15.00-20.00 per hour Laborer $6.50-14.00 per hour Lifeguard $6.15-14.00 per hour Manager on Duty Differential $1.00 per hour August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting 39 Office Specialist Receptionist Recreation Instructor/Leader Recreation Official Recreation Worker Theater Technician Vehicle Technician Video Coordinator' • will I Video Technician* $10.00-18.00 per our Water Safety Instructor (WSI) $7.50-16.00 per hour WSI & Head Lifeguard Differential $1.00 per hour (Lifeguards or WSIs working as Head Lifeguards; Lifeguards working as WSIs) *Video positions shall be paid a guarante BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the the pay rate within the above ranges. flat fee of $50 for 4 hours or less. Seconded by Councilmember Cave. shall have the authority to set August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting 40 J. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Pond Overlook Public Improvements, City Project 07-08, Resolution Awarding Construction Contract. a. Public Works Director Chuck AN presented the report. Councilmember Cave moved to approve the Pond Overlook Public Improvements, City Project 07- 08, Resolution Awarding Construction Contact. AWARD OF BIDS RESOLUTION 07-08-1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Northdale Construction in the amount of $107,606.75 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Pond Overlook Public Improvements (2161 County Road D) —City Project 07-08, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. Adopted by the council on this 27 day of August 2007. Seconded by Mayor Longrie. Ayes- All K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Adoption of the Capital Improvement Plan. This item was tabled. August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting 41 L. NEW BUSINESS 1. Renewal of Annual Lawful Gambling License — White Bear Avenue Business Association at AMF Maplewood Lanes and The Dive Bar. a. City Clerk, Karen Guilfoile presented the report. Councilmember Cave moved to approve the Renewal of Annual Lawful Gambling License — White Bear Avenue Business Association at AMF Maplewood Lanes and The Dive Bar. RESOLUTION 07-08-141 BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permits for lawful gambling is approved for the White Bear Avenue Business Association, to operate at AMF Maplewood Bowl located at 1955 English Street, and The Dive Bar located at 3035 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes — All 2. Approval of Wine and Strong Beer License — Dinh Yin Thong — Bambu Asian Cuisine. a. City Clerk, Karen Guilfoile presented the report. a. Dinh Yin Thong, Owner of Bambu Asian Cuisine, 1715-A Beam Avenue. Imember Rossbach moved to approve the Wine and Strong Beer License for Dinh Yin Th Councilmember Cave. Ayes- All 3. Set Special Meeting Date for the Purpose of Canvassing the Primary Election Results. a. City Clerk, Karen Guilfoile presented the report. The poles for the Primary Election will be open to vote on Tuesday, September 11 at 7:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. The city council set a special meeting for Thursday, September 13, 2007, at 5:00 p.m. for the purpose of canvassing the primary election results. No action is needed for this item. August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting 42 4. KohIman Lane Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-21, Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study. a. Public Works Director, Chuck Ahl presented the report. Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Kohiman Lane Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-21, Resolution Ordering Preparation of FeasibilitV Study. RESOLUTION 07-08-142 ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to the Kohiman Lane Area Streets, City Project 07-21 and to assess the benefited properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. ,000 are appropriated to prepare this feasibility st 2007 r Cave. Ayes — Councilmembers Cave, Hjelle, Juenemann, Rossbach Nay — Mayor Longrie August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting 43 FURTHERMORE, fur 5. Myrtle-Idaho Street Improvements, City Project 07-19, Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study. a. Public Works Director, Chuck Ahl presented the report. Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Myrtle-Idaho Street Improvements, City Proiec 07-19, Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study. RESOLUTION 07-08-143 [010 114 0 1 kIL02:2 0:42 ZT flQ ki Eel W ;1 *1*3 1 1 111 VA;J! t1i IYA WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to the Myrtle-Idaho Area Streets, City Project 07-19 and to assess the benefited properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, 'I • 0 �X 9 '. r TR E C ITT CO 1111 C I L 0 F MA� That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $30,000 are appropriated to prepare this feasibility report. Approved this 27th day of August 2007 Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes - Councilmembers Cave, Juenemann, Rossbach Nays - Mayor Longrie, Councilmember Hjelle August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting 44 6. Pond-Dorland Street Improvements, City Project 07-20, Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study. a. Public Works Director, Chuck Ahl presented the report. Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the Pond-Dorland Street Improvements, City Proiect 07-20, Resolution Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Study. RESOLUTION 07-08-144 ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to Pond Avenue and Dorland Road, City Project 07-20, and to assess the benefited property, for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he/she is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $30,000 are appropriated to prepare this feasibility report. Seconded by CouncilmembE nn. Ayes — Councilmembers Cave, Juenemann, Rossbach Nays — Mayor Longrie, Councilmember Hjelle August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting 45 7. Arkwright Utility Extensions, City Project 07-22, Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study. a. Public Works Director, Chuck AN presented the report. b. Donald Kaar, 394 Lark Avenue East, Maplewood, addressed the council. Councilmember Cave moved to approve the Arkwright Utility Extensions, City Proiect 07-22, Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study for the extension of sanitary sewer and water on Arkwright Street between Lark Avenue and Laurie Road. RESOLUTION 07-08-145 ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to Arkwright Utility Extension between Lark Avenue and Laurie Road, City Project 07-22, and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Ayes — All August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting 46 Seconded by CouncilmembE 8' MogremStreet Improvements, City Project 06-17 8. Resolution Ordering Preparation VfAssessment Roll U. Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment Hearing for September 24.2OO7. G. Public Works Director, ChUd«Ah| presented the report. Councilmember Cave moved to approve the Resolu the Mociren Street Improvement City Promect 06-17. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. ESSNHE0d7FROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk and city eng Improvements, City Project 06-17. receive bids for the MO0rem NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEW000, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and oKy engineer shall fo proper amount k}be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece 0r parcel [fland abutting on the streets affected, without regard tO cash valuation, provided bv law, and they shall file a copy Cf such proposed assessment inthe city office for inspection. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council thereof. August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting 47 Councilmember Cave moved to approve the Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll and OrdtEtg Assessment Preparation of Assessment Roll and Assessment Roll Hearing for October 8 1h , 2007, fo the Mogren Street Improvement, City Promect 06-17. RESOLUTION 07-08-147 ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL AND HEARING WHEREAS, the clerk and the city engineer have, at the direction of the council, prepared an assessment roll for the K80gn8D Street Improvements, City Project O0-17.8ndth8s@id@SS8SS[nRDt roll is on file in the office of the city engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OFMAPLEVVOC)D. MINNESOTA: 1 /\ hearing shall be held on the 8 day Vf October 2U07 the city hall 8tY:U8p.rn. to pass upon such proposed assessment and ot such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed tO cause 8 notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place 0f hearing, the general nature 0fthe improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the clerk and city engineer and that written or oral objections will b8considered. Seconded byCoUhci|rnernberJVenenl8nn. Ayes -All l August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting 48 a COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS Mi. Wendy's Restaurant COuDo|mSD1ber Cave asked if Mr. /\h| could shed some light onth9futUre[Oodirnprovernent project on White Bear Avenue and County Road D. Mr. AN gave a brief update regarding the |8L8st he had heard regarding the fUtVn8 n]8d construction of White Bear Avenue that may impact Wendy's Restaurant located at 1975 County Road D East, Maplewood. M2. NEST Councilmember Hjelle asked Mayor Longrie and Councilmember Rossbach what the rational was for naming Jinn Norman to the position with NEST. ` Mayor Longrie said Jim Norman applied to the NEST program in June and was recommended by the Mayor of Oakdale. In A COuOd|mS0bRrROSSb8Ch didn't see @ problem with the hiring Ofthis person and felt the situation didn't need k}be discussed any further. M3. City Manager Evaluation Update Council member Juenemann felt there had not been an improvement in Mr. Copeland's communication skills with her since his recent evaluation. Councilmember Juenemann said she doesn't have internet at home and chooses not to use her home fax and felt the City Manager should call her via the telephone. Councilmember Juenemann also had concerns regarding how the council meeting agenda has been handled. F-11 11 LTI I I 1! 1671111 :4 1 - 1 1 City Attorney, Alan Ka ve a brief update regarding current legal matters. nQ8t11:05p.rn. August 27, 2007, City Council Meeting we Agenda Item H1 TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Ch8rleS/\hL Public Works Director/City Engineer Michael Thompson, Civil Engineer 11 SUBJECT: Crestview Forest Improvements (Deer Ridge Lane), Project 06~21 1' Assessment Hearing, 7:00 p.m. 2- Approve Resolution for Adoption of Assessment Roll 3' Resolution Ordering Work to be Done by Day Labor INTRODUCTION The property owners have been mailed Gnotice of the exact amount of their assessment, as well as notice that they must submit a written objection either at or prior to the hearing if they disagree with the assessment amount. The city council should conduct the assessment hearing, receive any objections, and consider approving the attached resolutions of adopting the assessment roll and ordering work done by day labor. Ad the August 10.2007 council meeting (extension Of the August 1v the city council approved plans and specifications, ordered the assessment roll, accepted the roll and called the assessment hearing. No objections have been filed todate. The council will now consider moving forward with the work by authorizing day labor (or Department of Public Works Forces) to execute the proposed improvements. Background The improvements to the private street, O88r Ridge Lane, are being completed in response L8 G resident petition. The residents and Crestview Townhome Associations want Deer Ridge Lane to be taken back by the city oS o publicly maintained street. All costs for improvements will be assessed back to the property owners abutting the Deer Ridge Lane improvements. The total estimated cost for the improvements is $24.054. There are two homeowner associations involved with the project. The north half Of Deer Ridge Lane iS within the Crestview Forest || ||O090wO8ra Association and the south half of [)8Sr Ridge L8O8 is within Crestview Forest Town HO08 (}vvneng Association, Inc. The city has nn8{ with both associations three to four times over the course of this project. It is city staff's understanding from recent correspondence with association board members and their legal representative that the associations may pay the total assessment amount from reserve funds to avoid putting the assessment burden on homeowners within the two associations. The city assessed individual homeowners that front the improvement which is standard practice. It would be up to the associations to determine with their members how the assessment should be paid. The total estimated project cost is under $25 Under MN Statute 429, the City is oU0vved to utilize City Forces, or Day Labor, k)do the proposed work. Typically, iL makes more sense for the property tob8 assessed after the innpn}v8nn8ntS are connp|8L8d and the 8[tUG| cost has been determined. However, it was suggested bythe Local Improvement Guidelines (an explanation of MN Statute 429) that the assessment hearing be held prior to petitioning the council to authorize City Forces to do the work. The reason for this is that the funding for the project is secured prior tV City Forces commencing the work. Agenda Item H1 The proposed project area is illustrated Vn the attached location map. The improvements include re- grading of drainage outlet ditch, erosion oDntnO| stabilization, drafting Of 8 public right-of-way e8SenneDt, water utility upgrades perGPRVVG and restoration work. Assessment Objections Filed As of August 3O.2O07 staff has not received any objection k] the proposed assessments. Budget Impact There would be no impact on the approved budget based upon the recommendation below. The proposed assessment is the same 8s the feasibility cost estimate presented to the council 8L the June 25th,2007 Council Meeting. A summary of project nnateri8|a jeCtvvi||beprovided when the work i3completed. It is recommended that the city council approve the attached Resolutions for the Adoption Ofthe Assessment Roll and to Order Work tobS Done by Day Labor for the Crestview Forest Improvements (Deer Ridge Lane), City Project 06-21. Attachments: 1. Resolution for Adoption of the Assessment Roll 2. Resolution Ordering Improvement muoDone by Day Labor o. Assessment Roll 4. Assessment Map u. Location Map RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on August 13, 2007, calling for a Public Hearing, the assessment roll for the Crestview Forest Improvements (Deer Ridge Lane), City Project 06 -21, was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, the following property owners have filed objections to their assessments according to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows: 1. NONE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to review the objections received and report to the City Council at the regular meeting on September 24, 2007, as to their recommendations for adjustments. 2. The assessment roll for the Crestview Forest Improvements (Deer Ridge Lane) as amended, without those property owners' assessments that have filed objections, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted. Said assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 3. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2008 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.0 percent per arimmi for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2007. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, but no later than October 10, 2007, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the city clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time after October 10, 2007, pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 5. The city engineer and city cleric shall forthwith after October 1, 2007, but no later than November 15, 2007, transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the council on this 10`" day of September 2007. RESOLUTION ORDER WORK TO BE DONE BY DAY LABOR WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on August 13 th .280. the city engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the Crestview Forest Improvements (Deer Ridge L8n9) City Project 06-21, which have been presented to the council for approval, AND WHEREAS, the estimated cost of such improvement does not exceed $25,000, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CW MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. The city engineer shall proceed under the direction 0f the council, 8S given from time to time, to carry on all work in connection with such improvement in accordance with the plans and specifications herein approved. CRESTVIEW FOREST FINAL ASSESSMENT INFORMATION CITY PROJECT 06 -21 IMPROVEMENTS (DEER RIDGE LANE) PARCEL ID TAXPAYER STREET NUMBER STREET RESIDENTIAL UNITS EQUALLY DIVIDED ASSESSMENT 122822420196 FRED D YEKALDO 500 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420223 JEROME SARTOR TRUSTEE 501 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420197 MARY E JOYCE 502 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420224 DALE S ARMSTRONG 503 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420198 PATRICIA L MATZ 504 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420225 NANCY E KEELEY 505 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420199 ELIZABETH C REDDY 506 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420200 MARIAN J SVENDSEN 510 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420201 WALTER A MONDOR 512 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420202 DAVID H RICHTER 514 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420203 RUSSELL G NEPSTAD 516 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420204 JUNE S FREMONT 520 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420219 ALBERT O GUIZZETTI 521 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420205 PATRICIA L FREEMAN 522 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420220 PATRICIA A STONE 523 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420206 JOAN M MARONDE 524 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420221 NORMA A AMES 525 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420222 NANCY L DRISCOLL 527 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420207 LINDA L CULLEN 530 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420208 JANE I GRECO 532 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420209 BERNICE I BIELENBERG 534 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420210 BERNARD M VAGNONI 536 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420215 MELISSA ANN M HAYEK 539 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420211 JOAN R HALTER 540 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420216 WILLIAM L PARISH 541 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420212 EARL L PITTMAN 542 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420217 ROBERT H JOHNSON 543 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420213 OSCAR C TROOIEN LE 544 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420218 THOMAS M KALKA 545 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420214 JOHN R ARMBRUSTER 546 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420093 BRENT C ZEGLEN 550 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420092 JOHN SCHOENEWALD 551 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420094 ROBERT G HART 552 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420091 SUSAN L VENTO 553 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420095 ILENE L CARPENTER 554 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420090 LEV O WAGNER 555 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420072 VIRGINIA C BAKER 556 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420065 THOMAS J HAYEE 557 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420073 EVELYN M VIRNIG 560 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420064 PATRICK J FLAHERTY 561 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420074 DEBORAH JESPERSEN 562 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420063 ROBERT PRAYFROCK 563 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420075 MORRIS J REISTAD 564 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420062 KENJI OYANAGI 565 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420076 MARLYS A HOWELLS TRUSTEE 566 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420061 DOROTHEA HELEN KANDLER 567 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420077 GREGG D SHAVER 570 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420078 JANET L RAMSEY 572 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420079 MARY LOU SCHMIDT 574 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420080 RICHARD A BORGSTROM 576 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420081 WILLIAM B TRAUTZ 580 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420082 PETER J SAJEVIC TRUSTEE 582 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420083 RICHARD L WAKEFIELD 584 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 1 of 2 CRESTVIEW FOREST FINAL ASSESSMENT INFORMATION CITY PROJECT 06 -21 IMPROVEMENTS (DEER RIDGE LANE) PARCEL ID TAXPAYER STREET NUMBER STREET RESIDENTIAL UNITS EQUALLY DIVIDED ASSESSMENT 122822420084 WILLIAM L ALVEY 586 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420085 WILLIAM DORGAN 590 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420086 THOMAS P KANE 592 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420096 DONALD L EICKHOFF 594 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 122822420097 ROBERT C BLIZICKY 596 DEER RIDGE LN S 1 $430.24 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ASSESSMENT TOTAL TOTALS= 58 $24,954.00 2 of 2 CITY PROJECT 06 -21 ASSESSMENTS DEER RIDGE LANE DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a surrey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. AGENDA NO. 1-1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Finance and Administration Manager RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: September 5, 2007 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 260,175.15 Checks # 73402 thru # 73446 dated 08/17/07 thru 08/28/07 $ 139,935.55 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 08/17/07 thru 08/23/07 1,067,050.18 Checks# 73447 thru # 73498 dated 08/24/07 to 09/04/07 $ 293,330.23 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 08/24/07 to 08/30/07 $ 1,760,491.11 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $ 461,994.49 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 08/24/07 $ 2,624.27 Payroll Deduction check # 1002921 thru # 1002923 dated 08/24/07 $ 464,618.76 Total Payroll $ 2,225,109.87 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651-249-2903 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. ds. attachments S:\CTY Lists and Reports 2007\Agenda Reports\09-10-07\1 1 Approval of Claims Check Register City of Maplewood 08/24/2007 Check Date Vendor 73402 0811712007 01345 RAMSEY COUNTY 73403 0812012007 00396 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 73404 0812312007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 73405 0812312007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 73406 08128/2007 01337 RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV 73407 08128/2007 01504 CITY OF ST PAUL 73408 0812812007 03918 ACCOUNTEMPS 73409 0812812007 03613 ACTION IMPRINTS 73410 0812812007 03437 ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK 73411 0812812007 01811 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 08/2812007 01811 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 08/2812007 01811 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 73412 0812812007 03928 GEORGE CAVE 73413 0812812007 00279 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 0812812007 00279 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 0812812007 00279 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 73414 0812812007 00494 CHILDREN HOME & FAMILY SERVICE 73415 0812812007 00309 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 73416 0812812007 03929 ELECTRICAL VISIONS, INC. 73417 0812812007 00464 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH, INC 73418 08128/2007 03931 MICHAEL R EMERSON 73419 08128/2007 00509 FIRE MARSHAL ASSN OF MN 73420 08/2812007 00589 DAVE GRAF 73421 08/2812007 02945 HEALTHEAST VEHICLE SERVICES 73422 0812812007 00483 IDEACOM MID - AMERICA 73423 0812812007 03878 LAKE MANAGEMENT, INC. 73424 08/2812007 00982 METRO FIRE INC 73425 08/2812007 03930 RAMSEY- WASHINGTON METRO 73426 0812812007 00985 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 73427 0812812007 01001 MIDWEST LOCK & SAFE INC 0812812007 01001 MIDWEST LOCK & SAFE INC 73428 0812812007 01060 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC 73429 0812812007 01175 CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL 73430 0812812007 00001 ONETIMEVENDOR 73431 0812812007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 73432 0812812007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 73433 08128/2007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 73434 08128/2007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 73435 0812812007 01254 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 0812812007 01254 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 73436 0812812007 01289 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 73437 0812812007 03872 PRO STAFF 73438 08/2812007 03879 SANSIO 73439 08/2812007 02192 JIM SCHINDELDECKER 73440 0812812007 03398 SHAMROCK GROUP 73441 0812812007 01538 STRETCHER'S 73442 0812812007 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC 0812812007 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC 0812812007 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC 73443 0812812007 03916 TWIN CITY LAWN/LANDSCAPE INC. 0812812007 03916 TWIN CITY LAWN/LANDSCAPE INC. 73444 0812812007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC 08128/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC 73445 08128/2007 02464 US BANK 73446 08/2812007 01771 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE 45 Checks in this report. Description Amount FILING FEE TO OPEN CASE SALES TAX FOR USED VEHICLE EASEMENT ACQUISITION EASEMENT ACQUISITION FEE FOR 800 MHZ RADIOS MEDICAL SUPPLIES TEMP EMPLOYEE WEEK END 8110 EXPLORER - TSHIRTS INSURANCE AGENT FEE 07 -08 MDSE FOR RESALE MDSE FOR RESALE MDSE FOR RESALE REIMS FOR MILEAGE 4113 - 4114 PROJ 07 -03 RAINBOW - CONCRETE PROJ 07 -03 RAINBOW - CONCRETE PROJ 07 -03 RAINBOW - CONCRETE YOUTH DIVERSION FROG - JULY PROJ 06 -17 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING REFUND ELECT PERMIT BL -07 -12884 MINIATURE HALOGEN LAMP ESCROW REFUND 760 MEYER ST REC MEMBERSHIP DUES KARATE INSTRUCTOR 817 - 8128 VEHICLE CONVERSION PHONE SYSTEM REPAIRS & ADDS FOUNTAIN REPAIRS GAS DETECTOR/CHARGING STATION - WATERFEST CONTRIBUTION WASTEWATER - SEPTEMBER REPAIR REAR DOOR & INSTALL REMOVE & INSTALL CYLINDER -MAIN REGISTRATION FEES MONTHLY UTILITIES PROJ 06 -16 REIMS J KOLASA FOR REIMB W LEE - PROJ 05 -16 DRIVEWAY REFUND M JANOCHOSKI - CUSTOMER REFUND K FRFUND - DAY CAMP REFUND D JOHNSON - MISSED CLASS MDSE FOR RESALE MDSE FOR RESALE HERBICIDE APPLICATION TEMP CONTROLLER WEEK END 8112 EMS RUNSHEETS SUBSCRIPTION - AUG REIMB FOR SAFETY BOOTS 8122 MDSE FOR RESALE PRACTICE AMMUNITION VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIALS BASE & BITUMINOUS FOR 07 -03 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS FOR TRAIL LAWN SRVS - 2347 HILLWOOD DR E LAWN SRVS - 1068 LAKEWOOD DR N PROJ 07 -15 SEWER TELEVISING PROJ 07 -15 SEWER TELEVISING PAYING AGENT FEES BASKETBALL PROGRAMMING VENTURE 50.00 500.00 2,000.00 2,500.00 577.80 161.78 1,834.40 264.50 9,350.00 252.00 252.00 189.00 134.40 939.83 784.04 645.95 3,526.08 318.90 20.50 5.21 2,512.05 35.00 42.25 2,313.90 1,786.54 380.26 2,079.23 750.00 201, 847.06 313.39 284.59 450.00 4,619.87 425.00 189.27 107.00 18.00 6.00 713.70 38.00 1,284.18 2,684.29 614.60 109.99 285.20 168.26 2,467.01 375.18 373.69 312.50 225.00 275.00 160.00 543.75 7,079.00 2 CITY OF MAPLEVVOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Date 08/16/07 O8/1G/07 U017/07 U8/2O/0T U8/21/O7 O8/21/0T U8/22/07 U8/22/0T Settlement Date 08/17/07 O8/17/0T U8/20/07 08/21/0T O8/22/O7 O8/22/07 U8/23/07 U8/23/0T Payee MN State Treasurer MN Dept of Natural Resources MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer US Bank VISA One Cenj° MN State Treasurer MN Dept of Revenue 1� Description Amount Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 12.193.68 DNR electronic licenses 440.50 Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 10.036.76 Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 12.873.62 Drivers Licenae/OeputyRegie\nar 17.518.03 Purchasing card items 67.342.02 Drivers Lioenae/OeputyRegia\nar 14.459.04 Sales Tax 5.071.00 *Detailed listing of VISA purchases iaattached. lTl E.Y,� � c �,1 r • I+Y_�i � � [f 7 r • 1 � : Z �7 � [ � � � Iil. ��i Z i Y � � C I i i I �> ; :3I �I Trans Date Pasting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 0810712007 08/08/2007 VZWRLSS *APOCC VISN $44.27 R CHARLES AHL 08/0912007 0811512007 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS $575.00 R CHARLES AHL 0811112007 0811312007 AMERICAN Al 0012126167395 $294.10 R CHARLES AHL 0810912007 08/10/2007 CUB FOODS, INC. $9.16 MANDY ANZALDI 0811112007 0811312007 CUB FOODS, INC. $5.30 MANDY ANZALDI 0811312007 0811512007 MICHAELS #2744 $14.64 MANDY ANZALDI 0811412007 0811512007 CUB FOODS, INC. $54.35 MANDY ANZALDI 07/1112007 0810912007 NUCO2 $90.47 JIM BEHAN 0711812007 08/17/2007 WW GRAINGER 501 $987.88 JIM BEHAN 0712412007 0810912007 NUCO2 $86.42 JIM BEHAN 0712512007 0810912007 NUCO2 $90.47 JIM BEHAN 0713112007 08/09/2007 NUCO2 $77.48 JIM BEHAN 0810112007 0810912007 NUCO2 $60.86 JIM BEHAN 0810612007 0810712007 MINVALCO INC $279.81 JIM BEHAN 08/0912007 0811312007 AQUA LOGIC INC $26.39 JIM BEHAN 0810912007 0811312007 AQUA LOGIC INC $1,341.81 JIM BEHAN 0811512007 08/17/2007 PRIORTIY COURIER $27.80 JIM BEHAN 0811512007 0811712007 POOLSIDE $546.29 JIM BEHAN 0811612007 0811712007 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER $1,125.26 JIM BEHAN 0810212007 08/06/2007 ADVANCE SHORING COMPANY $60.39 TROY BRINK 08/0712007 0810912007 OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER $190.64 TROY BRINK 0811512007 0811612007 HYDROLOGIC WATER MANAGEME $17.53 TROY BRINK 0810212007 0810612007 INNOVATIVE COLOR PRINTING $84.60 HEIDI CAREY 0810212007 0810612007 INNOVATIVE COLOR PRINTING $1,446.48 HEIDI CAREY 0810212007 08/06/2007 INNOVATIVE COLOR PRINTING $42.30 HEIDI CAREY 0810312007 0810612007 DGI *DYNAMIC GRAPHICS $79.00 HEIDI CAREY 0810612007 0810712007 UPC *VISTAPRINT.COM $29.47 HEIDI CAREY 0810612007 08/08/2007 TIGER OAKS PUBLICATION $795.00 HEIDI CAREY 0810812007 0810912007 KINKOS.COM (P2K) ($217.22) HEIDI CAREY 0810812007 0810912007 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $51.96 HEIDI CAREY 0810812007 0810912007 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $142.47 HEIDI CAREY 0810812007 0810912007 KINKOS.COM (P2K) $217.22 HEIDI CAREY 0810812007 08/09/2007 GSIIENVELOPE MALL.COM $14.00 HEIDI CAREY 08/0812007 0810912007 GSItENVELOPE MALL.COM $17.20 HEIDI CAREY 0811412007 0811512007 GSItENVELOPE MALL.COM $55.95 HEIDI CAREY 0811512007 08/17/2007 INNOVATIVE COLOR PRINTING $117.15 HEIDI CAREY 0811612007 0811712007 GSI /ENVELOPE MALL.COM $26.75 HEIDI CAREY 0810312007 0810612007 PEARLS VISION #2 $416.54 SCOTT CHRISTENSON 0810712007 0810912007 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $217.13 SCOTT CHRISTENSON 08/0612007 0810812007 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $445.00 KERRY CROTTY 0810612007 08/08/2007 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $213.60 KERRY CROTTY 0810612007 0810812007 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $533.85 KERRY CROTTY 0810412007 0810612007 DIRECT SAFETY $69.13 CHARLES DEAVER 0810712007 08/08/2007 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $38.39 CHARLES DEAVER 0810812007 0810912007 MENARDS 3022 $21.28 CHARLES DEAVER 0810812007 0811012007 RYCO SUPPLY COMPANY $131.31 CHARLES DEAVER 08/0912007 0811012007 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS ($38.39) CHARLES DEAVER 0810912007 0811012007 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS ($66.24) CHARLES DEAVER 0810912007 08/10/2007 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $66.24 CHARLES DEAVER 0810912007 0811012007 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $127.82 CHARLES DEAVER 0811012007 0811312007 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $25.06 CHARLES DEAVER 0811012007 08/13/2007 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $26.59 CHARLES DEAVER 08/1612007 0811712007 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS ($114.46) CHARLES DEAVER 0810712007 0810812007 MENARDS 3022 $17.02 DAVE EDSON 0810112007 0810612007 CRAMER BLDG SERVICES INC $467.35 LARRY FARR 0810112007 0810912007 ST PAUL LINOLEUM & CARPET $276.90 LARRY FARR 0810212007 08/06/2007 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $5.62 LARRY FARR 0810312007 0810612007 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER $391.00 LARRY FARR 0810312007 0810612007 MENARDS 3022 $27.54 LARRY FARR 0810312007 08/08/2007 PARK SUPPLY OF AMERICA IN $197.55 LARRY FARR 0810412007 0810612007 TARGET 00021352 ($19.08) LARRY FARR 4 lTl E.Y,� � c �,1 r • I+Y_�i � � [f 7 r • 1 � : Z �7 � [ � � � Iil. ��i Z i Y � � C I i i I �1 :3I �I Trans Date Pasting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 0810412007 08/06/2007 TARGET 00021352 $11.41 LARRY FARR 08/0612007 0810712007 WINROC CORP- OAKDALE $198.63 LARRY FARR 0810612007 0810812007 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $178.75 LARRY FARR 0810712007 08/08/2007 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP $480.00 LARRY FARR 0810712007 0810812007 WINROC CORP- OAKDALE $19.87 LARRY FARR 0810712007 0810812007 MENARDS 3022 $25.52 LARRY FARR 0810812007 0810912007 WINROC CORP- OAKDALE $21.09 LARRY FARR 08/0812007 0810912007 ELECTRIC MOTOR REAPIR $519.12 LARRY FARR 0810812007 08/09/2007 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIP -MN $88.34 LARRY FARR 0810812007 0811012007 WW GRAINGER 250 ($755.89) LARRY FARR 0810812007 0811012007 WW GRAINGER 768 ($222.18) LARRY FARR 0810812007 08/10/2007 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $40.25 LARRY FARR 0810812007 0811012007 WW GRAINGER 495 $25.99 LARRY FARR 0810912007 0811012007 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER $1,704.78 LARRY FARR 08/0912007 0811012007 PREMIUM WATERS INC $5.33 LARRY FARR 0810912007 0811312007 WW GRAINGER 250 $679.60 LARRY FARR 0811012007 08/13/2007 RADIOSHACK COR00161455 $95.82 LARRY FARR 0811312007 0811412007 MENARDS 3059 $130.06 LARRY FARR 0811312007 0811512007 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $275.32 LARRY FARR 0811412007 08/15/2007 MENARDS 3022 $6.35 LARRY FARR 08/1412007 0811612007 OFFICE MAX $65.98 LARRY FARR 0811412007 0811612007 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $461.01 LARRY FARR 0811412007 0811612007 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $46.01 LARRY FARR 0811512007 0811612007 PETSMART 00004614 $98.87 LARRY FARR 0811512007 08/16/2007 MENARDS 3022 $4.24 LARRY FARR 0811512007 0811712007 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $17.97 LARRY FARR 0811512007 0811712007 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $65.89 LARRY FARR 0811512007 08/17/2007 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $72.94 LARRY FARR 0811612007 0811712007 TWIN CITY HARDWARE HADLEY $280.00 LARRY FARR 0811612007 0811712007 TWIN CITY HARDWARE HALE $12.27 LARRY FARR 0811612007 0811712007 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER $98.58 LARRY FARR 0810712007 0810812007 MINNESOTAS BOOKSTORE $37.45 DAVID FISHER 0810712007 08/09/2007 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC $472.45 DAVID FISHER 08/0912007 0811012007 MIDWEST LOCK & SAFE INC $36.21 DAVID FISHER 0811012007 0811312007 ORB AP800101 BBPLB4JN $1198 DAVID FISHER 0811012007 08/13/2007 USAIRWAYS 0371567979899 $403.10 DAVID FISHER 0811012007 0811312007 USAIRWAYS 0371567979900 $403.10 DAVID FISHER 0811412007 0811512007 PAYPAL INC $59.95 MYCHAL FOWLDS 0811412007 0811612007 WWW.CIRCUITCITY.COM $217.20 MYCHAL FOWLDS 08/0612007 0810812007 DELL MARKETING L.P. $1,456.52 NICK FRANZEN 0810712007 08/09/2007 INVESTINTECH.COM INC $119.95 NICK FRANZEN 0810912007 0811012007 BEST BUY MHT 00000109 $127.78 NICK FRANZEN 0811312007 0811512007 DELL CATALOG SALES, L.P. $636.87 NICK FRANZEN 0811612007 08/17/2007 ATACOMM $239.97 NICK FRANZEN 0811612007 0811712007 ATACOMM $15.60 NICK FRANZEN 0810812007 0810912007 PAKOR INC $413.72 PATRICIA FRY 08/1012007 0811312007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $103.59 PATRICIA FRY 0811312007 0811412007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $31.61 PATRICIA FRY 0811012007 08/13/2007 LANDSCAPE ALTERNATIVES $193.30 VIRGINIA GAYNOR 0811412007 0811612007 MICKMAN BROTHERS GARDE $95.72 VIRGINIA GAYNOR 0810312007 0810612007 EAT INC $409.48 CLARENCE GERVAIS 0811012007 08/13/2007 EAT INC $130.00 CLARENCE GERVAIS 08/0312007 0810612007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $40.62 JEAN GLASS 0810912007 0811312007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $38.33 JEAN GLASS 0811012007 0811312007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $56.36 JEAN GLASS 0811312007 0811412007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $44.89 JEAN GLASS 0810312007 08/06/2007 AVALON TEAROOM & PASTR $6.38 JANET M GREW HAYMAN 0810312007 0810612007 ARVEY PAPER & OFFICE PRO $2,313.32 KAREN E GUILFOILE 0811012007 0811312007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $17.86 KAREN E GUILFOILE 0811012007 08/13/2007 PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC. $50.00 KAREN E GUILFOILE 0811412007 0811512007 VZWRLSS*APOCC VISN $123.79 KAREN E GUILFOILE 5 lTl E.Y,> r � c �,1 r • I+Y_�i? t � [f 7 r • 1 � : Z �7 � [ � � � Iil. ��i Z i Y � � C I i i I �1 :3I �I Trans Date Pasting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 0811612007 08/17/2007 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $5.61 MARK HAAG 08/0312007 0810612007 METRO SALES INC $1,103.40 LORI HANSOM 0810812007 0810812007 COMCAST CABLE COMM $184.61 LORI HANSON 0811412007 08/16/2007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $74.54 LORI HANSON 0811412007 0811612007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $15.01 LORI HANSON 0811012007 0811312007 MENARDS 3059 $82.37 PATRICK HEFFERNAN 0811112007 0811312007 MENARDS 3059 {$1.58} PATRICK HEFFERNAN 08/1112007 0811312007 MENARDS 3059 $6.22 PATRICK HEFFERNAN 0811212007 08/13/2007 TARGET 00011858 $6.36 PATRICK HEFFERNAN 0811312007 0811412007 MENARDS 3059 ($58.51) PATRICK HEFFERNAN 0811312007 0811412007 MENARDS 3059 $26.59 PATRICK HEFFERNAN 0811312007 08/15/2007 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $4.26 PATRICK HEFFERNAN 0811412007 0811612007 MAPLEWOOD MARINE INC $452.65 PATRICK HEFFERNAN 0811412007 0811512007 MENARDS 3059 $57.34 ROLAND HELEY 08/0412007 0810612007 OFFICE MAX $48.72 RICK HERLUND 0810612007 0810712007 MENARDS 3022 $26.04 GARY HINNENKAMP 0810712007 08/09/2007 OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER $169.34 GARY HINNENKAMP 0811312007 0811412007 HEJNY RENTAL $138.59 GARY HINNENKAMP 0811412007 0811512007 HEJNY RENTAL $225.20 GARY HINNENKAMP 0811512007 08/16/2007 HEJNY RENTAL $82.88 GARY HINNENKAMP 08/1512007 0811612007 HEJNY RENTAL $172.40 GARY HINNENKAMP 0810912007 0811012007 SWIMOUTLET.COM $87.80 RON HORWATH 0810912007 0811312007 SEARS ROEBUCK 1122 $8.51 RON HORWATH 0810912007 0811312007 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $7.33 RON HORWATH 0810812007 08/09/2007 KNOWLANS #2 $39.92 ANN E HUTCHINSON 0810812007 0810912007 MONARCH WATCH $51.00 ANN E HUTCHINSON 0811312007 0811512007 ADAMS PEST CONTROL $69.23 ANN E HUTCHINSON 0811412007 08/15/2007 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $254.15 ANN E HUTCHINSON 0811412007 0811512007 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $76.22 ANN E HUTCHINSON 0811512007 0811612007 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $2.24 ANN E HUTCHINSON 0810712007 0811312007 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $152.03 DAVID JAHN 0810912007 0811012007 MOGREN LANDSCAPE SUPPLY L $54.58 DON JONES 0811612007 08/17/2007 BATTERIES PLUS $45.24 TOM KALKA 08/0612007 0810712007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $35.03 LISA KROLL 0810712007 0810812007 REED BUS INFO ACCT REC $178.40 LISA KROLL 0810912007 08/10/2007 ST PAUL STAMP WORKS INC $111.04 LISA KROLL 0811012007 0811312007 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE $716.98 LISA KROLL 0811612007 0811712007 REED BUS INFO ACCT REC $1,028.03 LISA KROLL 0811312007 0811512007 RUN N FUN $85.00 DAVID KVAM 08/1012007 0811012007 SPRINTPCS AUTOPYMT RC1 $54.09 ERIN M LABEREE 0811312007 08/15/2007 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $21.27 RANDY LINDBLOM 0810212007 0810612007 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $29.78 DENNIS LINDORFF 0810612007 0810712007 MENARDS 3059 $5.92 DENNIS LINDORFF 0810912007 08/13/2007 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $31.73 DENNIS LINDORFF 0810712007 0810812007 WALGREEN 00016873 $9.78 HOLLY LINTNER 0810712007 0810812007 BATTERIES PLUS $34.04 HOLLY LINTNER 08/0912007 0811012007 CUB FOODS, INC. $0.74 HOLLY LINTNER 0810312007 0810612007 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT $1,201.63 STEVE LUKIN 0810312007 08/06/2007 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT $644.02 STEVE LUKIN 0810312007 0810612007 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT $949.71 STEVE LUKIN 0810812007 0810912007 JIMMY JOHN'S 574 Q61 $50.00 STEVE LUKIN 0811412007 08/15/2007 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $97.77 STEVE LUKIN 08/1412007 0811612007 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $79.54 STEVE LUKIN 0811512007 0811612007 DE LAGS LANDEN OP01 OF 01 $379.14 STEVE LUKIN 0811512007 0811612007 VZWRLSS*APOCC VISN $38.33 STEVE LUKIN 0811612007 0811712007 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC ($263.27) STEVE LUKIN 0810212007 08/06/2007 THE TESSMAN COMPANY $136.96 MARK MARUSKA 0810212007 0810612007 ON SITE SANITATION INC $15.28 MARK MARUSKA 0810312007 0810612007 VIKING ELECTRIC -ST. PAUL $87.23 MARK MARUSKA 0810712007 08/09/2007 ON SITE SANITATION INC $30.56 MARK MARUSKA 0810912007 0811012007 WMS£WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY $785.38 MARK MARUSKA 0 lTl E.Y,> r � c �,1 r • I+Y_�i � � [f 7 r • 1 � : Z �7 � [ � � � Iil. ��i Z i Y � � C I i i I �1 :3I �I Trans Date Pasting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 0811012007 08/14/2007 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT $92.93 MARK IMARUSKA 08/1512007 0811612007 UNITED RENTALS #D10 $128.35 MARK MARUSKA 0810812007 0810812007 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFIC $415.00 ROBERT MITTET 0811012007 08/13/2007 SHRED -IT 01 OF 01 $19.65 ROBERT MITTET 0811012007 0811312007 SHRED -IT 01 OF 01 $19.65 ROBERT MITTET 0811112007 0811312007 USPS 2683519555 $5.70 ROBERT MITTET 0810312007 0810612007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $182.46 AMY NIVEN 08/0212007 0810612007 OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER $169.34 ERICK OSWALD 0810612007 08/07/2007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $20.30 MARY KAY PALANK 0810612007 0810812007 TARGET 00021352 $8.91 MARY KAY PALANK 0810712007 0810812007 AMAZON.COM $68.17 PHILIP F POWELL 0810812007 08/09/2007 LABSAFE *1010016290 $50.90 PHILIP F POWELL 0810812007 0811012007 WOLF CAMERA #1530 $111.78 PHILIP F POWELL 0810812007 0811012007 CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03 $7.98 PHILIP F POWELL 08/0912007 0811012007 TWIN CITY JANITOR SUPPLY $57.51 PHILIP F POWELL 0810912007 0811012007 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE $42.59 PHILIP F POWELL 0810912007 08/10/2007 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $41.20 PHILIP F POWELL 0810912007 0811312007 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE $10.65 PHILIP F POWELL 0811412007 0811512007 ABACUS PLUS SERVICES INC $731.66 PHILIP F POWELL 0810412007 08/06/2007 TRI -ANIM HEALTH SERVICES $995.00 ROBERT PRECHTEL 08/0712007 0810812007 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $995.34 ROBERT PRECHTEL 0810712007 0810912007 S & W HEALTHCARE CORP $360.00 ROBERT PRECHTEL 0810812007 0810912007 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $358.14 ROBERT PRECHTEL 0810812007 0811012007 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $10.47 ROBERT PRECHTEL 0810912007 08/10/2007 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC ($21.86) ROBERT PRECHTEL 0811412007 0811512007 TARGET 00011858 $185.98 ROBERT PRECHTEL 0811412007 0811512007 SCANTRON $129.11 ROBERT PRECHTEL 0811612007 08/17/2007 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $3.73 ROBERT PRECHTEL 0810812007 0810912007 GE CAPITAL $331.22 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 0811412007 0811612007 CENTURY BOOKSTORE $34.00 WILLIAM J PREFER 0810212007 0810612007 CATCO PARTS &SERVICE $26.22 STEVEN PRIEM 0810312007 0810612007 SOI *SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL $218.00 STEVEN PRIEM 0810712007 08/08/2007 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC ($126.28) STEVEN PRIEM 08/0712007 0810812007 POLAR CHEVROLET $28.67 STEVEN PRIEM 0810712007 0810812007 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC $227.33 STEVEN PRIEM 0810712007 08/08/2007 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC $20.85 STEVEN PRIEM 0810712007 0810912007 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19 $155.70 STEVEN PRIEM 0810812007 0810912007 POLAR CHEVROLET $28.67 STEVEN PRIEM 0810812007 0810912007 BATTERIES PLUS $255.57 STEVEN PRIEM 08/0912007 0811312007 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $75.69 STEVEN PRIEM 0810912007 08/13/2007 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039 $208.56 STEVEN PRIEM 0811012007 0811312007 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC $823.64 STEVEN PRIEM 0811312007 0811412007 BATTERIES PLUS $255.57 STEVEN PRIEM 0811312007 08/15/2007 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC ($683.17) STEVEN PRIEM 0811312007 0811512007 BAUER BULT TRE33200023 $617.41 STEVEN PRIEM 0811312007 0811512007 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19 $94.89 STEVEN PRIEM 08/1312007 0811512007 CATCO PARTS &SERVICE $309.79 STEVEN PRIEM 0811412007 0811512007 BAUER BULT TRE33200023 $103.05 STEVEN PRIEM 0811412007 08/15/2007 SOI *SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL $283.77 STEVEN PRIEM 0811412007 0811612007 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS $1,511.24 STEVEN PRIEM 0811412007 0811612007 EAT INC $42.33 STEVEN PRIEM 0811512007 08/17/2007 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $52.84 STEVEN PRIEM 08/1512007 0811712007 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039 $355.87 STEVEN PRIEM 0811512007 0811712007 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19 $68.82 STEVEN PRIEM 0811512007 0811712007 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC $177.48 STEVEN PRIEM 0811512007 0811712007 AGS /SAFELITE #5156 $195.18 STEVEN PRIEM 0810212007 08/06/2007 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED $2,077.97 KEVIN RABBETT 0810312007 0810612007 SHRED -IT 01 OF 01 $99.90 KEVIN RABBETT 0811312007 0811312007 COMCAST CABLE COMM $34.00 KEVIN RABBETT 0811512007 08/16/2007 HEALTHEAST TRANSPORTATN $574.65 KEVIN RABBETT 0810612007 0810812007 THE STAR TRIBUNE ADVERTIS $697.20 TERRIE RAMEAUX 7 lT l E.Y,> r � c �,1 r • I+Y_�i � � [f 7 r • 1 � : Z �7 � [ � � � Iil. ��i Z i Y � � C I i i I ��:3I �I Trans Date Pasting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 0810812007 08/09/2007 PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISIN $2,233.08 TERRIE RAMEAUX 08/1012007 0811312007 MN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH $1,872.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX 0713112007 0811712007 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $18.11 MICHAEL REILLY 0811012007 08/13/2007 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $1,348.27 MICHAEL REILLY 0811012007 0811312007 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $1,322.75 MICHAEL REILLY 0811612007 0811712007 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS $1,468.19 MICHAEL REILLY 0810312007 0810612007 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $22.38 AUDRA ROBBINS 08/0712007 0810912007 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $16.27 AUDRA ROBBINS 0810812007 08/09/2007 CUB FOODS, INC. $119.34 AUDRA ROBBINS 0810812007 0810912007 CASCADE BAY CITY OF EAGAN $252.00 AUDRA ROBBINS 0811012007 0811312007 CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03 $20.00 AUDRA ROBBINS 0811512007 08/16/2007 822 -11 GROUP SALES BOOTH $1,203.75 AUDRA ROBBINS 0811512007 0811612007 822 -11 GROUP SALES BOOTH $20.10 AUDRA ROBBINS 0811612007 0811712007 CUB FOODS, INC. $132.19 AUDRA ROBBINS 08/0612007 0810812007 BROCK WHITE -180 $679.17 ROBERT RUNNING 0810712007 0810912007 BROCK WHITE -180 ($642.00) ROBERT RUNNING 0810712007 08/09/2007 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO $720.79 ROBERT RUNNING 0810612007 0810812007 JOHNSON PLASTICS $501.01 HARRIET J RYDEL 0810712007 0810912007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $56.22 HARRIET J RYDEL 0811312007 08/14/2007 PEI WEI ASIANDINER0113 $155.49 HARRIET J RYDEL 08/1512007 0811712007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $180.69 HARRIET J RYDEL 0811012007 0811312007 MENARDS 3059 $24.20 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 0811012007 0811312007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $46.49 DEB SCHMIDT 0811312007 0811412007 TRUCK UTILITIES INC $74.09 SCOTT SCHULTZ 0810312007 08/06/2007 WEBER & TROSETH INC $124.00 MICHAEL SHORTREED 0810712007 0810812007 BATTERIES PLUS $32.24 MICHAEL SHORTREED 0810812007 0810912007 FEDERAL SIGNAL EMP $238.56 MICHAEL SHORTREED 0810912007 08/10/2007 MERIT CHEVROLET $79.65 MICHAEL SHORTREED 0810912007 0811012007 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $16.55 MICHAEL SHORTREED 0810912007 0811312007 GOODYEAR AUTO SRV CT 6920 $682.63 MICHAEL SHORTREED 0811312007 0811512007 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC ($678.95) MICHAEL SHORTREED 0811412007 0811612007 GOODYEAR AUTO SRV CT 6920 $417.53 MICHAEL SHORTREED 0810312007 08/06/2007 T- MOBILE IVR PAYMENT $72.94 ANDREA SINDT 08/0612007 0810712007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $199.19 ANDREA SINDT 0811012007 0811312007 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $104.77 ANDREA SINDT 0810712007 08/08/2007 TARGET 00020461 $6.91 CHRISTINE SOUTTER 0810812007 0811012007 DEPT OF AGRICULTURE $15.30 CHRISTINE SOUTTER 0811512007 0811612007 BATTERIES PLUS $35.13 CHRISTINE SOUTTER 0811012007 0811312007 METRO SALES INC $992.00 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 08/1012007 0811312007 OFFICE MAX $38.06 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 0811512007 08/16/2007 DE LAGS LANDEN OP01 OF 01 $626.43 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 0810912007 0811312007 SEARS ROEBUCK 1122 $59.99 RONALD SVENDSEN 0810312007 0810612007 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY $85.52 JAMES TAYLOR 0810912007 08/13/2007 STREAMLINE DESIGN INC $279.75 JAMES TAYLOR 0810912007 0811312007 STREAMLINE DESIGN INC $747.80 JAMES TAYLOR 0810212007 0810612007 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $52.91 TODD TEVLIN 08/1012007 0811312007 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS #807 $25.56 TODD TEVLIN 0810812007 0810912007 INTL ASSN OF CHIEF OF POL $375.00 DAVID J THOMALLA 0811412007 08/16/2007 TRAVEL INSURANCE POLICY 3 $13.74 DAVID J THOMALLA 0811412007 0811612007 NWA AIR 0122152877427 $305.50 DAVID J THOMALLA 0810612007 0810812007 MINUTEMAN PRESS $262.23 SUSAN ZWIEG 0810912007 08/13/2007 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER IN $148.04 SUSAN ZWIEG 08/1512007 0811712007 QUILL CORPORATION $71.27 SUSAN ZWIEG 0 Check Register City of Maplewood 0813112007 Check Date Vendor Description Amount 73447 0812412007 02464 US BANK FUND FOR ATM 8,000.00 73448 0910412007 00519 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO. NITROGEN CYLINDER 98.63 73449 0910412007 00585 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL NET BILLABLE TICKETS - JULY 842.60 73450 09/0412007 02728 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES INC PROJ 07 -15 PROF SRVS THRU 7/31 85,456.13 0910412007 02728 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES INC PROJ 06 -17 PROF SRVS THRU 6130 49,331.05 09104/2007 02728 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES INC PROJ 06 -16 PROF SRVS THRU 7131 34,851.49 73451 09104/2007 01819 MCLEOD USA LOCAL PHONE SERVICE 7116 - 8/15 955.47 73452 09104/2007 01504 CITY OF ST PAUL RECORD MGMT SOFTWARE FEES - AUG 3,798.00 09/04/2007 01504 CITY OF ST PAUL SIGNAL LOCATE 94.58 73453 09104/2007 01190 XCEL ENERGY ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY 23,517.19 09/04/2007 01190 XCEL ENERGY ELECTRIC UTILTIY 1,192.27 09/04/2007 01190 XCEL ENERGY METERED SPEED SIGN 10.58 73454 09/0412007 01798 YOCUM OIL CO. 2% BIO DIESEL ULTRA LOW RED DYED 16,899.09 73455 09104/2007 03918 ACCOUNTEMPS TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE WEEK END 8/17 1,650.96 73456 09104/2007 03890 APPLE GLASS REPLACEMENT GLASS FOR POLICE 119.11 73457 09/04/2007 03824 ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS MONTHLY PREMIUM - SEPT 8,889.32 73458 09104/2007 00159 PAUL BARTZ REIMS FOR UNDERCOVER CLOTHING 177.86 73459 09/04/2007 03513 BRIAN BIERDEMAN K -9 MAINTENANCE - SEPT 35.00 73460 09104/2007 03915 BOEHMS CYCLE REPAIR EXERCISE EQUIPMENT 1,053.02 73461 09/0412007 00211 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP. PROJ 06 -16 PROF SRVS THRU 8/10 6,070.25 09/04/2007 00211 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP. PROJ 07 -14 PROF SRVS THRU 8/10 3,106.75 09104/2007 00211 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP. PROJ 07 -15 PROF SRVS THRU 8110 1,942.50 09104/2007 00211 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP. PROJ 07 -01 PROF SRVS THRU 8110 338.00 73462 0910412007 03555 BUSCH SYSTEMS INTL INC 400 RECYCLING BINS 2,924.00 73463 09/04/2007 02929 CNAGLAC MONTHLY PREMIUM - SEPT 509.66 73464 09104/2007 02897 EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT REGISTRATION FEES 1,000.00 73465 09/04/2007 01906 DAVE EDSON REIMS FOR SAFETY BOOTS 8/22 122.46 73466 09/04/2007 03516 ANTHONY GABRIEL K -9 MAINTENANCE - SEPT 35.00 73467 09/0412007 03245 HARTFORD GROUP INC PROJ 02 -18 LEGACY VILLAGE ESCROW 6,894.96 73468 09104/2007 03262 HENNEPIN CHIEF'S ASSN REGISTRATION FEE 200.00 09104/2007 03262 HENNEPIN CHIEF'S ASSN REGISTRATION FEE 200.00 73469 09/04/2007 00615 HLB TAUTGES REDPATH, LTD 2006 AUDIT, ACCOUNTING ASSISTANCE 16,245.00 73470 0910412007 01605 IFP TEST SERVICES INC PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAM 375.00 73471 09/04/2007 00719 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #622 CITY'S 1/3 SHARE OF TARTAN ARENA 31,358.51 73472 09104/2007 03729 KNAAK & KANTRUD PA PROSECUTION & LEGAL SERVICES - 16,500.00 73473 09/0412007 00393 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY CCLD FALL SEMINAR FOR 5 175.00 73474 09/04/2007 02060 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA YOUTH BASKETBALL EXPENSES 232.55 73475 09104/2007 02944 MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION ESCROW RELEASE 2318 OLIVIA CT 1,256.58 09104/2007 02944 MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION ESCROW RELEASE 2320 OLIVIA CT 1,256.58 73476 09104/2007 03818 MEDICA MONTHLY PREMIUM - SEPT 136,875.00 73477 09/04/2007 03270 MICHAEL A. MILLER /ISN ADULT SOFTBALL UMPIRES 815 - 8/23 2,862.00 73478 09104/2007 01084 MN FALL MAINTENANCE EXPO REGISTRATION FEES 225.00 73479 09/04/2007 01084 MN FALL MAINTENANCE EXPO REGISTRATION FEES 175.00 73480 09/04/2007 01085 MN LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY PREMIUM - SEPT 3,335.49 73481 09/0412007 01126 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE PERA LIFE INSURANCE - AUG 332.00 09104/2007 01126 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE PERA LIFE INSURANCE - SEPT 332.00 73482 09104/2007 03622 MN OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECH WIDE AREA NETWORK - JULY 392.00 73483 09/04/2007 01095 MODERN FENCE & CONST INC REPLACE WIRE ON BACKSTOP 1,100.00 73484 09104/2007 03785 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO, INC PROJ 06 -08 COTTAGEWOOD 1,271.45 73485 09/04/2007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND M ANDERSON - DAY CAMP 50.00 73486 09104/2007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REIMS J HUGHES FOR RAINGARDEN 35.00 73487 09/0412007 03933 PETERSON, FRAM & BERGMAN MATTERS RE: LAZARYAN 82.71 73488 09/04/2007 03872 PRO STAFF TEMP CONTROLLER WEEK END 8119 2,313.19 73489 09104/2007 01409 S.E.H. PROJ 07 -14 PROF SRVS - JULY 64,293.75 09104/2007 01409 S.E.H. PROJ 07 -01 PROF SRVS - JULY 16,792.41 0910412007 01409 S.E.N. PROJ 06 -05 PROF SRVS - JULY 8,157.57 09/04/2007 01409 S.E.N. PROJ 06 -02 PROF SRVS - JULY 7,191.54 09104/2007 01409 S.E.H. PROJ 07 -08 PROF SRVS - JULY 6,634.69 09/04/2007 01409 S.E.H. PROJ 03 -20 PROF SRVS - JULY 3,061.91 09/04/2007 01409 S.E.H. PROJ 04 -21 PROF SRVS - JULY 2,858.27 09/0412007 01409 S.E.H. PROJ 06 -17 PROF SRVS - JULY 2,679.64 9 Check Register City of Maplewood 08/31/2007 Check Date Vendor Description Amount - - 7910412 - 007 01409 S.E.H. PROF SRVS 5130 - 7131 689.72 0910412007 01409 S.E.H. PROJ 02-07 PROF SRVS - JULY 366.66 0910412007 01409 S.E.H. PROJ 04-05 PROF SRVS - JULY 245.00 73490 09/0412007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT MDSE FOR RESALE 375.59 09/04/2007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT MISC SUPPLIES & WATER FOR FIRE 375.18 09104/2007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT MDSE FOR RESALE 259.08 09104/2007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT CAMP SUPPLIES 204.82 09104/2007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT MDSE FOR RESALE 203.07 09/04/2007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT BIRTHDAY PROGRAM 55.78 09104/2007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT DAYCAMP SNACKS & BATTERIES 47.77 09/04/2007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT BIRTHDAY PROGRAM 45.47 09/04/2007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT BIRTHDAY PROGRAM 40.73 09/0412007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT BIRTHDAY PROGRAM 15.23 73491 09104/2007 00198 ST PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS WATER UTILITY 9,193.98 09104/2007 00198 ST PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS WATER UTILITY - KENNARD IRRIGATION 110.16 73492 09/04/2007 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC PROJ 06-16 DESOTO SKILLMAN PMT #3 441,640.53 73493 09104/2007 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC GRAVEL & BIT FOR RAINBOW PROJ 719.53 09/04/2007 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIALS 500.50 73494 09104/2007 00449 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC TRNG, DATA CONVERSION, & PROJ 5,274.50 09/0412007 00449 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC TRNG, DATA CONVERSION, & PROJ 2,731.25 09/04/2007 00449 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC TRNG, DATA CONVERSION, & PROJ 1,250.00 09104/2007 00449 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC TRNG, DATA CONVERSION, & PROJ 750.00 09104/2007 00449 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC TRNG, DATA CONVERSION, & PROJ 150.00 73495 0910412007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 07-14 SEWER TELEVISING 490.00 09/04/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 07-14 SEWER TELEVISING 415.00 09104/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 07-14 SEWER TELEVISING 375.00 09/04/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 06-16 SEWER TELEVISING 355.00 09/04/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 06-16 SEWER TELEVISING 355.00 09/0412007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 06-16 SEWER TELEVISING 275.00 09104/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 06-16 SEWER TELEVISING 275.00 09104/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 07-14 SEWER TELEVISING 275.00 09/04/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 06-16 SEWER TELEVISING 225.00 0910412007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 06-16 SEWER TELEVISING 205.00 09/04/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 07-14 SEWER TELEVISING 185.00 09104/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 06-16 SEWER TELEVISING 160.00 09/0412007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 06-16 SEWER TELEVISING 160.00 09/04/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 06-16 SEWER TELEVISING 160.00 09104/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 07-14 SEWER TELEVISING 160.00 09104/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 07-14 SEWER TELEVISING 160.00 09104/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 07-14 SEWER TELEVISING 160.00 09/04/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 07-14 SEWER TELEVISING 160.00 09104/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 07-14 SEWER TELEVISING 160.00 09/04/2007 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 07-15 SEWER TELEVISING 160.00 73496 09/04/2007 00529 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO STD PLAN 4043120-1 SEPT 1,553.00 73497 09/0412007 02464 US BANK PAYING AGENT FEES 431.25 09104/2007 02464 US BANK PAYING AGENT FEES 431.25 09104/2007 02464 US BANK PAYING AGENT FEES 431.25 09/04/2007 02464 US BANK PAYING AGENT FEES 431.25 09104/2007 02464 US BANK PAYING AGENT FEES 431.25 09/04/2007 02464 US BANK PAYING AGENT FEES 215.63 73498 09104/2007 03932 VALLEY CREEK EXPRESS INC, COMPOST SEEDING - CITY CAMPUS 4,244.98 1.067,050.18 52 Checks in this report. 0111 CITY OF MAPLEVVOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Date O023/O O8/23/0 U8/23/07 U8/23/0T U8/24/O7 O8/24/0T U8/24/07 U8/27/0T O8/27/O7 O8/27/07 U8/27/07 U8/27/0T U8/28/O7 O8/2S/0T U8/2S/07 Settlement Date O024/O O8/24/0 U8/24/07 08/24/0T O8/27/O7 O8/27/07 U8/27/07 U8/2O/0T O8/28/O7 O8/28/0T U8/28/07 U8/2O/0T O8/2S/O7 O8/30/07 U8/30/07 Payee IVIN State Treasurer IVIN Dept of Natural Resources |CyNA(Vantagepointe) Orchard Trust IVIN State Treasurer U.S. Treasurer P.E.R.A. IVIN State Treasurer yNidAmerice |NG Labor Unions IVIN State Treasurer VV| Dept ofRevenue IVIN State Treasurer IVIN State Treasurer ARC Administration K�� Description Drivers License/Deputy Registrar DNR electronic licenses Deferred Compensation Deferred Compensation Drivers Licenae/OeputyRegie\nar Federal Payroll Tax P.E.R.A. Drivers License/Deputy Registrar HRAF|ex plan Union Dues State Payroll Tax State Payroll Tax Drivers Licenae/OeputyRegie\nar Drivers License/Deputy Registrar OCRP& Flex plan payments Amount 16,191.02 420.00 3,883.66 23,005 12,054.29 90,700.36 64,982.95 15,270.05 1.897.54 3.932.25 17,540.50 1,085.05 20,435.07 18,394.38 3,537.96 11 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 08!24/07 CAVE, REBECCA 397.80 08/24/07 HJELLE, ERIK 397.80 08/24107 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 397.80 08/24/07 ROSSBACH, WILLIAM 397.80 08/24/07 COPELAND, EUGENE 3,090.00 08/24/07 RYDEL, HARRIET 1,665.35 08124/07 CHRISTENSON, SCOTT 1,690.16 08124/07 FARR, LARRY 2,271.92 08/24; PALANK, MANDY 305.25 08/24; RAMEAUX, THERESE 2,826.96 08/24107 MITTET, ROBERT 3,366.86 08/24107 ANDERSON, CAROLE 360.97 08/24/07 DEBILZAN, JUDY 999.35 08/24/07 JACKSON, MARY 2,008.01 08124/07 KELSEY, CONNIE 2,246.66 08124/07 FRY, PATRICIA 1,865.22 08/24/07 GUILFOILE, KAREN 3,366.86 08/24/07 KROLL, LISA 1,710.74 08/24/07 MORSON, JOHN 552.00 08/24/07 SCHMIDT, DEBORAH 2,047.66 08/24/07 SPANGLER, EDNA 855.69 08/24/07 CORTESI, LUANNE 929.85 08/24107 JAGOE, CAROL 1,728.46 08/24107 KELLY, LISA 1,026.35 08/24/07 LARSON, MICHELLE 853.80 08/24/07 MECHELKE, SHERRIE 1,021.49 08/24/07 MOY, PAMELA 1,12395 08/24/07 OSTER, ANDREA 1,96792 08/24/07 WEAVER, KRISTINE 1,893.36 08/24/07 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,726.15 08124/07 POWELL, PHILIP 2,589.83 08124/07 RICHIE, CAROLE 1,733.08 08/24/07 THOMALLA, DAVID 4,429.00 08/24/07 ABEL, CLINT 2,852.60 08/24/07 ALDRIDGE, MARK 2,548.85 08/24/07 BAKKE, LONN 2,974.57 08/24/07 BARTZ, PAUL 3,525.82 08/24/07 BELDE, STANLEY 2,491.53 08124/07 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 2,974.00 08124/07 BOHL, JOHN 2,883.56 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 08124/ BUSACK, DANIEL 2,423.18 08124/ COFFEY, KEVIN 2,653.94 08124107 CROTTY, KERRY 2,830.77 08124107 DOBLAR, RICHARD 4,379.57 08124/07 FREDERIKSEN, DAWN 1,240.26 08/24/07 FRITZE, DEREK 1,64593 08124107 GABRIEL, ANTHONY 3,087.07 08124107 HAWKINSON JR, TIMOTHY 1,810.93 08/24/07 HEINZ, STEPHEN 2,945.94 08/24/07 HIEBERT, STEVEN 2,766.66 08124107 JOHNSON, KEVIN 3,805.42 08124107 KALKA, THOMAS 739.88 08/24/07 KARIS, FLINT 3,918.10 08/24/07 KONG, TOMMY 2,400.11 08124/07 KROLL, BRETT 2,510.47 08124/07 KVAM, DAVID 3,523.42 08/24; LANGNER, TODD 1,985.86 08/24; LARSON, DANIEL 2,400.11 08124107 LINTNER, HOLLY 673.48 08124107 LU, JOHNNIE 2,863.63 08/24/07 MARINO, JASON 2,422.18 08/24/07 MARTIN, JERROLD 3,069.68 08124107 MCCARTY, GLEN 2,583.79 08124107 METRY, ALESIA 2,400.11 08/24107 NYE, MICHAEL 2,482.23 08/24107 OLSON, JULIE 2,445.82 08124107 PALMA, STEVEN 2,84692 08124107 RABBETT, KEVIN 3,587.70 08/24/07 RHUDE, MATTHEW 2,562.58 08/24/07 STEFFEN, SCOTT 3,639.98 08/24/07 STEINER, JOSEPH 2,337.18 08/24107 SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM 2,103.01 08/24107 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 2,607.30 08/24107 TRAN, JOSEPH 2,514.38 08124107 WENZEL, JAY 2,50193 08124107 XIONG, KAO 2,411.15 08/24/07 BERGERON, JOSEPH 4,896.58 08/24/07 DUGAS, MICHAEL 3,030.84 08124107 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 2,605.80 08124107 FLOR, TIMOTHY 2,961.02 13 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 08124/ FRASER, JOHN 3,020.85 08124/ LANGNER, SCOTT 2,480.26 08124107 THEISEN, PAUL 3,231.64 08124107 THIENES, PAUL 3,622.23 08124/07 BARTA, JEREMY 2,502.77 08/24/07 CRISTOFONO, BRIAN 1,952.53 08124107 DAWSON, RICHARD 2,936.44 08124107 DUELLMAN, KIRK 2,253.59 08/24/07 EVERSON, PAUL 3,613.26 08/24/07 HALWEG, JODI 2,905.39 08124/07 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS 2,864.74 08124/07 NOVAK, JEROME 2,656.47 08/24/07 OLSON, JAMES 2,586.07 08/24/07 PARSONS, KURT 2,403.83 08124/07 PETERSON, ROBERT 2,509.62 08124/07 PRECHTEL, ROBERT 3,146.15 08/24; SVENDSEN, RONALD 3,607.95 08/24; GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE 3,146.15 08124/07 LUKIN, STEVEN 4,016.18 08124107 ZWIEG, SUSAN 1,866.15 08/24/07 DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT 293.39 08/24/07 AHL, R. CHARLES 4,500.69 08124107 KNUTSON, LOIS 1,616.59 08124107 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 3,059.51 08/24107 NIVEN, AMY 1,294.62 08/24107 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 2,601.26 08124/07 AHL, GREGORY 840.00 08124/07 BRINK, TROY 2,012.99 08/24/07 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 1,948.55 08/24/07 EDGE, DOUGLAS 1,958.55 08124107 FOERG, ELIZABETH 952.00 08124107 FREBERG, RONALD 886.31 08/24107 HAMRE, MILES 992.00 08/24107 JONES, DONALD 2,091.23 08124107 MEISSNER, BRENT 940.00 08124107 MEYER, GERALD 2,027.39 08/24/07 NAGEL, BRYAN 2,486.01 08/24/07 OSWALD, ERICK 2,191.13 08124107 RUNNING, ROBERT 1,999.75 08124107 SETNES, SAMUEL 840.00 ITH CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 08124/ TEVLIN, TODD 1,931.75 08124/ BURLINGAME, NATHAN 1,585.35 08124107 DUCHARME, JOHN 1,511.02 08124107 ENGSTROM, ANDREW 1,886.69 08124/07 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 2,121.35 08/24/07 JACOBSOM SCOTT 1,953.35 08124107 JAROSCH, JONATHAN 2,191.75 08124107 KREGER, JASON 1,943.45 08/24/07 KUMMER, STEVEN 2,617.49 08/24/07 LABEREE, ERIN 2,882.35 08124107 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,486.07 08124107 MAHLER, MATTHEW 502.81 08/24/07 O'CONNOR, DONOVAN 756.40 08/24/07 SCHREMPP, ANTHONY 979.99 08124/07 SKOWYRA, NICHOLAS 863.59 08124/07 THOMPSON, MICHAEL 2,718.18 08/24; WACHAL, KAREN 520.89 08/24; ZIEMAN, SCOTT 871.20 08124107 LUND, MARK 960.00 08124/07 MARUSKA, MARK 2,912.84 08/24/07 NAUGHTON, JOHN 1,981.71 08/24/07 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1,950.86 08124107 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 197.41 08124107 DEAVER, CHARLES 543.62 08/24107 GERNES, CAROLE 716.25 08/24/07 HAYMAN, JANET 1,316.36 08124107 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,400.31 08124107 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 3,495.41 08/24/07 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE 1,038.46 08/24/07 SINDT, ANDREA 1,830.95 08124107 THOMPSON, DEBRA 690.46 08124107 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,693.35 08/24107 FINWALL, SHANN 2,600.07 08/24107 ROBERTS, KENNETH 2,747.14 08124107 BRASH, JASON 1,589.35 08124107 CARVER, NICHOLAS 2,939.21 08/24/07 FISHER, DAVID 3,823.36 08/24/07 RICE, MICHAEL 2,27895 08124107 SWAN, DAVID 2,346.15 08124107 WELLENS, MOLLY 1,420.18 im CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 08124/ BURLINGAME, SARAH 440.00 08124/ SAMUELSON, MICHAEL 2,243.49 08124107 BERGER, STEPHANIE 175.00 08124/07 BJORK, ALICIA 800.00 08124/07 BJORK, BRANDON 795.50 08/24/07 COLEMAN, JOHN 210.38 08124107 OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN 1,120.00 08124107 ROBBINS, AUDRA 2,369.00 08/24/07 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 368.13 08/24/07 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS 3,02490 08124/07 TAYLOR, JAMES 1,856.47 08124/07 GERMAIN, DAVID 1,957.79 08/24/07 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 1,948.55 08/24/07 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 2,210.29 08124107 ANDERSON, ANTHONY 336.00 08124/07 ANZALDI, MANDY 1,872.31 08/24; CAREY, HEID1 2,243.79 08/24107 CRAWFORD - JR. RAYMOND 540.00 08124107 EVANS, CHRISTINE 83799 08124107 HER, CHONG 870.00 08/24/07 HOFMEISTER, MARY 774.24 08/24/07 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 578.67 08124107 STAPLES, PAULINE 1,528.20 08124107 TOLBERT, FRANCINE 144.00 08/24/07 ZIELINSKI, JUDY 30.80 08/24/07 BIGGS, ANNETTE 126.00 08124107 BRENEMAN, NEIL 904.53 08124/07 BRUSOE, AMY 81.00 08/24/07 BRUSOE, CRISTINA 400.91 08/24/07 CHASE, STEPHANIE 176.63 08/24107 DEL ROSARIO, THERESA 58.50 08/24107 DUNK, RYAN 776.33 08/24107 ERICKSON- CLARK, CAROL 47.50 08/24107 EVANS, KRISTIN 43.90 08124/07 FONTAINE, KIM 702.38 08124/07 GREDVIG, ANDERS 629.19 08/24/07 HALEY, BROOKE 410.80 08/24/07 HASSENSTAB, DENISE 67.05 08124107 HORWATH, RONALD 2,336.04 08124107 IRISH, PETER 42.25 in CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE 1002834 1002835 1002836 1002837 1002838 1002839 1002840 1002841 1002842 1002843 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24,`07 08/24,`07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 08/24/07 EMPLOYEE NAME JOHNSON, JAMES KOEHNEN, AMY KOEHNEN, MARY KRONHOLM,KATHRYN LAMEYER, ZACHARY MATHEWS, LEAH NELSON, MARCY PROESCH, ANDY RYAN, ERICA SMITH, ANN TUPY, HEIDE TUPY, MARCUS WOLFGRAM, MARY GROPPOLI, LINDA HER, SHILLAME HOLMGREN, STEPHANIE PARAYNO, GUAI BEHAN, JAMES PATTERSON,ALBERT PRINS, KELLY REILLY, MICHAEL SCHOENECKER, LEIGH VANG,HUE YANG, TIM AICHELE, CRAIG PRIEM, STEVEN WOEHRLE, MATTHEW BERGO,CHAD FOWLDS, MYCHAL FRANZEN, NICHOLAS LONGRIE, DIANA JAHN, DAVID MORIN, TROY PALANK, MARY SVENDSEN, JOANNE SHORTREED, MICHAEL W ELCHLIN, CABOT MELANDER, JON BUCKLEY,BRENT ANDERSON, MICHAEL AMOUNT 130.31 52.10 1,525.41 724.94 108.25 339.40 552.50 257.88 18.20 275.80 63.60 275.63 478.08 296.63 113.78 114.38 246.93 1,820.69 1,20492 1,108.62 1,756.55 414.40 29.80 331.40 2,049.19 2,191.75 1,814.15 2,355.82 2,561.82 2,104.86 452.00 1,689.17 165.75 1,728.46 1,988.02 3,268.81 2,537.23 1,262.00 1,534.95 960.00 17 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 1002844 08124/ EDSON, DAVID 1,989.37 1002845 08124/ GORE, MICHAEL 960.00 1002846 08124/07 HELEY, ROLAND 1,990.59 1002847 08124107 HINNENKAMP, GARY 1,958.27 1002848 08124/07 LINDORFF, DENNIS 1,953.17 1002849 08/24/07 NOVAK, MICHAEL 1,948.55 1002850 08124107 OLSON, SCOTT 836.00 1002851 08124107 SOUTTER, CHRISTINE 1,290.00 1002852 08/24/07 FAR-LEY, JAMIE 840.00 1002853 08/24/07 GEBHARD, MADELINE 677.25 1002854 08124107 GOODRICH, DANIELLE 309.38 1002855 08124107 MALLET, AMANDA 258.75 1002856 08/24/07 RYCHLICKI, NICHOLE 165.00 1002857 08/24/07 HAAG, MARK 2,067.45 1002858 08124/07 NADEAU, EDWARD 3,061.98 1002859 08124/07 GLASS, JEAN 1,924.86 1002860 08/24; HANSEN, LORI 2,302.26 1002861 08/24; NAGEL, BROOKE 573.00 1002862 08124107 SIMPSON, JOSEPH 177.10 1002863 08124107 ANDERSON, JOSHUA 327.60 1002864 08/24/07 ANDERSON, JUSTIN 28095 1002865 08/24/07 BENJAMIN, AYLA 55.88 1002866 08124107 BOTHWELL, KRISTIN 355.20 1002867 08124107 BRENEMAN, SEAN 194.85 1002868 08/24/07 BUCHMAYER, NICOLLET 303.88 1002869 08/24/07 CHASTAN, ADAM 117.00 1002870 08124107 DEMPSEY, BETH 49.00 1002871 08124107 FENGER, JUSTIN 439.65 1002872 08/24/07 FLETCHER, LOGAN 177.13 1002873 08/24/07 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 1,133.34 1002874 08124107 HAGSTROM, EMILY 273.00 1002875 08124107 HERM, BREANNA 45.50 1002876 08/24107 HOLMBERG, LADONNA 340.00 1002877 08/24107 JOYER, JENNA 26.00 1002878 08124107 KOLLER, NINA 278.44 1002879 08124107 KOVACS, BREANNA 113.75 1002880 08/24/07 KURZHAL, ALISON 39.00 1002881 08/24/07 LYNCH, KAYLA 65.00 1002882 08124107 NWANOKWALE, MORDY 206.63 1002883 08124107 PEHOSKI, JOEL 163.08 im CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 1002884 08124/ RICHTER, DANIEL 68.00 1002885 08124/ RICHTER, NANCY 377.25 1002886 08124107 ROGNESS, TRYGGVE 508.30 1002887 08124107 ROSTRON, ROBERT 236.50 1002888 08124/07 RYDEEN, ARIEL 210.00 1002889 08/24/07 SAUCERMAN, MICHAEL 576.74 1002890 08124107 SCHAEFER, NATALIE 53.00 1002891 08124107 SCHMIDT, EMILY 264.55 1002892 08/24107 SCHMIDT, JOHN 97.50 1002893 08/24107 SCHRAMM, BRITTANY 233.13 1002894 08124107 SCHREINER, MICHELLE 325.50 1002895 08124/07 SCHUNEMAN, GREGORY 74.75 1002896 08/24/07 TRUE, ANDREW 551.18 1002897 08/24/07 VASKO, BEN 42.25 1002898 08124 /07 WARNER, CAROLYN 226.35 1002899 08124 /07 WARNER, REBECCA 282.15 1002900 08/24; WHITE, NICOLE 114.60 1002901 08/24; WICKNER, KRISTY 71.50 1002902 08124/07 WILLIAMS, KRISTINE 220.85 1002903 08124107 WOLFGRAM, TERESA 140.88 1002904 08/24/07 WOODMAN, ALICE 184.00 1002905 08/24/07 ZALK, IDA 74.13 1002906 08124107 BOSLEY, CAROL 295.00 1002907 08124107 PATTERSON. FELORENZA 259.00 1002908 08/241`07 SATTLER, CASSANDRA 16.25 1002909 08/241`07 SATTLER, MELINDA 288.60 1002910 08124/07 STODGHILL, AMANDA 32.63 1002911 08124/07 TELLS, KAIYA 292.00 1002912 08/24/07 ZAGLR, LINNEA 252.70 1002913 08/24/07 BIRKHOLZ, TYLER 279.13 1002914 08124107 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,307.83 1002915 08124107 GADOW, ANNA 261.98 1002916 08/24107 HER, PETER 139.00 1002917 08/24107 O'GRADY, VICTORIA 185.00 1002918 08124/07 SCHULZE, KEVIN 416.25 1002919 08124/07 VANG, KAY 244.20 1002920 08/24/07 VUE, LOR PAO 181.00 461,994.49 li' Agenda Item 12 TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Pubic Works Director/City Engineer Erin Laberee, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Mogren Street Improvements, City Project 06-17 1. Assessment Hearing Date Revision DATE: August 30, 2007 INTRODUCTIONIBACKGROUND On August 27 the City Council approved scheduling an assessment hearing for the Mogren Street Improvements. A clerical error was made in the report. The agenda report stated that the hearing was to be set for September 24 The resolution stated the hearing would occur on October 8 The correct assessment hearing date is October 8 2007. It is recommended that the city council approve the assessment hearing for the Mogren Street Improvement, City Project 06-17 for October 8th 2007. RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the clerk and the city engineer have, at the direction of the council, prepared on assessment roll for the K8O0n]n Street Improvements, City Project O8-17,8ndth8said8s888snlentrol|iSon file in the office Cf the city engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL C)F[NAPLEVVO[)O, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall m b8h8|dVnth88 day of October 2OO7.at the city hall atY:O0p.nn.tOpass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices LO the owners Vf all property affected by said assessment. The notice Cf hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the clerk and city engineer and that written or oral objections will beconsidered. Agenda Item 13 r_%�J TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review — Dege Garden Center LOCATION: 831 Century Avenue North DATE: September 4, 2007 4191IM91109N The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Dege Garden Center at 831 Century Avenue North is due for review. Refer to the maps on pages three through seven. BACKGROUND June 3, 1971: The city council approved a CUP for the parking lot at Dege Garden Center. June 1, 1988: The city council reviewed the CUP and revised the conditions. Refer to the CUP conditions in the minutes on page eight. June 22, 1989: The city council reviewed the CUP and required review again in five years. June 27, 1994: The city council reviewed the CUP and required review again in five years. August 24, 1999: City staff approved plans for Mr. Dege to add a 16- by 24-foot fenced-in plant storage area. This fenced-in area is north of the trash enclosure. (See the approved site plan on page six.) November 27, 2000: The city council reviewed this permit and authorized the continuation of the CUP for the Dege Garden Center subject to: 1. The business following the June 1, 1988, conditions of approval. 2. The city council shall review the permit again in five years. The city may review the permit in less than five years if the owner proposes a change or if a problem arises. In 1988, Mr. Dege installed a garage in the parking lot of the business. The district court subsequently required him to remove the garage since it violated the terms of his 1971 CUP. DISCUSSION Staff is not aware of any major problems specifically with Mr. Dege's business. However, on a recent inspection, staff did note that the "no left turn sign" from the Dege driveway onto 7 th street was missing. Staff will work with Mr. Dege to get a new sign installed. RECOMMENDATION Continuation of the conditional use permit for Dege Garden Center at 831 Century North Avenue, subject to: 1. The business following the June 1, 1988, conditions of approval. This shall include replacing the "no-left turn sign" for the driveway onto 7 th Street by March 1, 2008. 2. The city council shall review this permit again in one year. The city may review this permit in less than one year if the owner proposes a change or if a problem arises. pseo25\deg* CUP Review (2)-2OO7 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. She Plan 4. Site Plan Revision dated 8-24-00 5. Aerial Photo O. CUP conditions dated June 1.1898 Attachment T 0' i II - - -- -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - I man Attachment 2 0, ui �w 4 Attachment 3 .� q e • " A � 4 e i LI` GARDEN CENTER V41 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 Exi7[1�G ptv'ti•�ioa! fu�F�sf, .` ZONING BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN Rl (SINGLE DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) ZONE AND BC (BUSINESS COMMERCIAL) ZONE. R7 IS WEST OF ZONING LINE BC IS EAST OF ZONING LINE 0 a.ww ®• • i r .�r•if�• r�. r . .�RY +� w•� ° '• °I Mt • = �1 *. rR »e. .•1. Ar r ! ` • • » . • * • rR = -.7TH STRF-ET R ° ,V Rte" *•' • #•s.ar ��� �r�{y,, y���� . L -t Iff•iLi+y' _ 1MLAtoT ,�„ .� q e • " A � 4 e i LI` GARDEN CENTER V41 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 Exi7[1�G ptv'ti•�ioa! fu�F�sf, .` ZONING BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN Rl (SINGLE DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) ZONE AND BC (BUSINESS COMMERCIAL) ZONE. R7 IS WEST OF ZONING LINE BC IS EAST OF ZONING LINE 0 e • " A � 4 e i LI` GARDEN CENTER V41 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 Exi7[1�G ptv'ti•�ioa! fu�F�sf, .` ZONING BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN Rl (SINGLE DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) ZONE AND BC (BUSINESS COMMERCIAL) ZONE. R7 IS WEST OF ZONING LINE BC IS EAST OF ZONING LINE 0 im 6 t LN M. A ta 2Z' nent 4 2 cr i� S =r Qp STAFF-APPROVEDQ;ITE PLAN (AUGUST 24, 1999) 7 m L Lip 8 M. A ta 2Z' nent 4 2 cr i� S =r Qp STAFF-APPROVEDQ;ITE PLAN (AUGUST 24, 1999) 7 m L M. A ta 2Z' nent 4 2 cr i� S =r Qp STAFF-APPROVEDQ;ITE PLAN (AUGUST 24, 1999) Attachment Attachment Attachment 6 12. The zero setback to the R-1 zone to the west is justified since the R-1 zone is developed as a commercial parking lot. 13. The existing setback to the south lot line is justified since the canopy is an extension of the existing building line and removing part of the canopy to meet the setback would be less attractive and expose storage and sales items to view. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site plan submitted by Mr. Dege on October 27, 1986, shall be revised based on a survey of the south lot line and the west line of the canopy. The revised plan and the remodeling plans submitted on December 15, 1987, and May 23, 1988, shall be con- sidered part of this permit, except for any change must be ap- proved by the Community Design Review Board. 2. The parking lot may only be used for parking for the garden center building. 3. No commercial use for sale, storage, display or advertising signs of garden materials, plants, or any other kinds of goods shall be allowed anywhere on the legally described property to which this conditional use permit is issued or the parking lot. 4. No portion of this site or parking lot shall be used for truck or trailer storage. S. Review, renewal or revocation of this permit shall in accordance with City code. 6. Any trees on the site that die must be replaced. 7. No exterior lighting or speakers shall be allowed. 8. The canopy shall not be enclosed for year around use. 9. Sales under the canopy or outdoors shall be limited to garden products from March through October. No other type of sales or storage shall be allowed. 10. Council may require removal of the canopy for additional parking or to reduce parking demand if the use changes. 11. A fence does not have to be constructed along the south lot line. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. b. Garage R0koval Deadline 1. Councilmembe� Juker moved that the deadline for the garage removal be September 30, t999. Motion died for lack f a second. 1 � 6/l/ A% Agenda Item 14 TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review PROJECT: St. Paul Regional Water Services (McCarron's Treatment Plant) LOCATION: 1900 Rice Street DATE: August 27, 2007 I ! III I at] Bill" 1111[•P► The conditional use permit (CUP) for the St. Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) facilities at 1900 Rice Street is due for review. The CUP allowed for the expansion of the facility which includes three new buildings: (1) a two -story 36,000- square -foot office building with 240 parking spaces, (2) a one -story 11,230- square -foot meter shop and warehouse, and (3) a one -story 17,350- square -foot vehicle maintenance and storage building with associated parking and landscaping features. In addition, a future plan to build a cold vehicle storage building was included on the plans. (See the maps on pages three — five). ��ftT:Z�11I�1� December 15, 1988: The city council approved a CUP for SPRWS to construct a clear -water pond west of Sylvan Street and north of Larpenteur Avenue. June 10, 1996: The city council approved a CUP and design plans for the expansion of the solids dewatering facility. August 11, 1997: The city council approved a CUP and design plans for the construction of two building additions and a new building at the water treatment plant. December 10, 2001: The city council approved a CUP and design plans for the expansion and renovation of the water treatment plant. June 23, 2003: The city council approved a CUP and design plans for the construction of three new buildings on the water services campus. (See the council minutes starting on page six.) On July 12, 2004, the city council reviewed the CUP and agreed to review it again in one year. On July 25, 2005, the city council reviewed the CUP and agreed to review it again in one year. On August 14, 2006, the city council reviewed this CUP and agreed to review it again in one year. DISCUSSION The St. Paul Regional Water Services three newest buildings and the associated parking lots and driveways are complete. The contractor completed the installation of the required landscaping, including the trout stream and buffer restoration, (with native trees and grasses) within the campus. However, some of the landscaping in and around the visitor and employee parking lot has died. Kou Vang, the project engineer for SPRWS, outlines the status of the site work and landscaping in his letter on page 12. SPRWS expects to construct the approved cold vehicle storage buildings in 2009 or 2010. Because the applicant has not yet finished the project construction and all of the associated site work, the city should review this conditional use permit again in one year. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit for the St. Paul Regional Water Services campus at 1900 Rice Street again in one year. P:sec 18\st paul water utility cup review - 2007 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2, Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4, June 23, 2003, City Council Minutes 5. August 15, 2007 letter from Kou Vang 2 N Attachment 1 HEE' C t F x� Location Map St. Paul Water Utility 1900 Rice Street I ,; I WR Attachment 2 z t 0 R Y U i I LARF Zoning Map St. Paul Water Utility 1900 Rice Street At-tachment .4 Attachment 4 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:30 P.M., June 23, 2003 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 03-13 A. CALL TO ORDER: A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. 8:55 p.m. St. Paul Regional Water Services —McCarron's Water Treatment Plant a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Associate Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report. C. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission Report. d. Boardmember Olson presented the Design Review Board Report. e. Jim Butler, architect for the project provided further specifics. Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution approving a stream setback variance at the St. Paul Water Regional Water Service at the McCarron's Water Treatment Plant: RESOLUTION 03-06-117 STREAM SETBACK VARIANCE WHEREAS, David Wagner, of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services, asked the city to approve a stream setback variance from the zoning ordinance. WHEREAS, this variance applies to the water utility property at 1900 Rice Street. The legal description is: R City Council 05-27-03 SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22 IN THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD REVISED DESCRIPTION NUMBER 175 A SPECIFIC PART OF SEC 18, TN 29, R 22. (PIN 18-29-22-31-0042) WHEREAS, Section 36-196(h) of the wetland protection ordinance requires a 60-foot-wide stream buffer area next to streams. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 40-foot-wide stream buffer. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1. On June 2, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this variance. 2. The city council held a public hearing on June 23, 2003, City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described variance for the following reasons: Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. The 60-foot-wide stream buffer requirement would make development of this site difficult. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, since the applicant would greatly improve a portion of the stream buffer over its present state and the proposed development plans will treat storm water from the site with rainwater gardens, bio-retention basins and other best management practices. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: Dedicating a 40-foot-wide stream protection buffer easement along the west property line of the site adjacent to the future cold storage building and creating a buffer along the entire length of the stream contained or bordering their property. The buffer shall be 50 feet wide in all possible areas. This easement shall be prepared by a land surveyor, shall describe the boundary of the buffer and shall prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, grading, filling or dumping within the buffer. The applicant shall record this easement before the city issues a building permit. 2. Submitting a revised landscape plan for the restoration of all the stream-protection buffer on the west side of the site, including all the day-lighted parts of Trout Brook. This plan shall show extensive use of native plantings and grasses and shall be subject to city staff and watershed district approval. 0 City Council 05-27-03 3. Installing city approved signs at the edge of the stream-protection buffer that prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, grading, filling or dumping within the buffer. Seconded by C ouncilmember Wasiluk Ayes-All Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use permit revision for the addition of four building a new parking lot and associated site plan changes for the St. Paul Regional Water Services McCarron's Water Treatment Plant at 1900 Rice Street North: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION 03-06-118 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Water Utility has requested a revision to their conditional use permit to add four new buildings, parking and landscaping to plant facilities at the St. Paul Water Utility McCarron's Water Treatment Plant. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 1900 Rice Street North. The legal description is: SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22 IN THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD REVISED DESCRIPTION NUMBER 175 A SPECIFIC PART OF SEC 18, TN 29, R 22. (PIN 18-29-22-31-0042) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On June 2, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On June 23 2003, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above-described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approves this permit because: The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a N City Council 05-27-03 nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes-All Councilinember Koppen moved to adopt the design plans for the St. Paul Regional Water Services McCarron's Water Treatment Plant at 1900 Rice Street North: Approve the plans (date-stamped April 24, 2003) for the proposed office building, meter shop and vehicle maintenance buildings (with the associated parking and landscaping) at the St. Paul Regional Water Services McCarron's Water Treatment Plant at 1900 Rice Street North. This approval does not include the future cold vehicle storage building shown on the plans along the west side of the site. The city bases this approval on findings required by the code. The property owner or contractor shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a permit for this project. 2. Provide the following for city staff approval before the city issues a grading or building permit: 9 City Council 05-27-03 a. Building material and color samples of the plaster, metal panels, roofs, trim, and garage doors. b. A revised landscape/screening plan that shows the following: (1) The spruce trees proposed for the south and east sides of the parking lot and the property revised from 6 feet in height to 8 feet in height. (2) The planting of more coniferous trees along the south and east sides of the proposed parking lot to help screen the parking lot from the houses to the south and east. (3) Landscaping details for the stream buffer area and for the proposed rainwater gardens. If the basin area will only be seeded, the area must be vegetated with native grasses and forties. The mix design must be approved by the city before the contractor does the seeding. (4) An in-ground irrigation system (including sprinkler heads) for the areas that would have sod. The city does not require irrigation for areas with native grasses or for the rainwater gardens. c. Detailed grading, drainage, paving, utility and erosion control plan for approval by the Assistant City Engineer. These plans shall meet all the requirements of the Assistant City Engineer. d. A detailed photometric plan for all proposed outdoor lighting showing the location, style, height and design of the proposed light fixtures. All freestanding lights shall not be taller than 25 feet, and the illumination from any outdoor light must not exceed 0.4-foot candles at all property lines. e. Plans for any trash-dumpster enclosures. The gates for such enclosures shall be 100 percent opaque, and the materials and colors of the enclosure shall be compatible with those of the new buildings. These plans shall be subject to staff approval. f. Proof of recording of a 40-foot-wide stream protection buffer easement along the west property line. This easement shall be prepared by a land surveyor, shall describe the boundary of the buffer and shall prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. The applicant shall record this easement before the city issues a building permit. g. A letter of credit or cash escrow for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. 3. Complete and install all required exterior improvements, including the approved landscaping and any dunipster enclosures before occupying the buildings. im City Council 05-27-03 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June I if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Seconded by C ouncilmember Wasiluk Ayes-All 11 City Council 05-27-03 a ftt[, BOARD Off' WATER r Attachment 5 fr. President: Patrick Harris + Vick. President: John Zanmiller Commissioners: Matt Anfang + Gregory Kleindl m Debbie Montgomery + Will Rossbach + Dave Thune August 15, 2007 Mr. Ken Roberts City of Maplewood 1 830 County Road B East Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE; Conditional Use Permit Review Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) — 1900 Rice Street Deaf Mr, Roberts: AUG 1 17200? � Here is an update for our Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Review per our telephone conversation last week. I believe the only thing outstanding on the CLIP is the cold vehicle storage building. At this point in time, it is expected that construction of the cold vehicle storage building would be in 2010. Other minor issues on the side are as follows. In July 2007, SPRWS cleared a couple small areas consisting of planted native vegetation on the north corner islands of the main south parking lot, the native plants and grass got too tall and was creating a traffic hazard. SPRWS will replace these areas with landscaping rock and low growing plants this fall. SPRWS will also continue to replace dead trees that were planted with the Campus Project. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (651) 266 -6266. Sincerely, Kou Vang Project Manager KVfjml SAINT P AUL REGIONAL W ATER S ERVICES Stephen P. Schneider, General Manager 1900 Rice St. Saint Paul MIDI 55113 -6810 * TTY; 651 -266 -6299 Smart Paul Regional Water Services provides quality water services to the following cities: Arden Hills-Falcon Heiglits "Lauderdale "Little Canada Maplewood endota�Mendota Heights Roseville Saint Paul west St. Paul 12 AA -ADA -EEC Employer printed on recycled paper Agenda Item 15 TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review PROJECT Cottagewood PUD LOCATION: Forna|| Street, south of Highvvood&venua DATE: September 4, 2007 Project Description The conditional use permit (CUP)for the Cottagewood PUUiS due for review. This CUP iS for 815- unit town house PU[) (planned unit development). Refer t0 the maps and plans On pages three through seven and the city council minutes starting on page eight. BACKGROUND On August 28,20O8 the city council made several approvals for this development. They included a revision to the planned unit development, a preliminary plat and a resolution ordering the public improvements. These approvals were subject to several conditions. (Please see the city council minutes starting on page eight.\ On September 19, 2006, the community design review board approved the design o|8nSf0r Cottagewood (subject to several conditions of approval). (]n March 12 the city council approved the final plat for Cottagewood. The contractor has COmo|8t8d the site Qrading, retaining vva||g. UU|hU8s and the base CoVrS8 for the private driveway. However, there is landscaping, curbing, paving and other site work that the contractor still needs t0finish. Phil S0by' the project d8v8|op8[tO|d[nSth@tth8yhOpGt0finishth8 n8nl8inin0 driveway work this fall and possibly start 8 nnod8| home later this year. He noted that with the slow down in the housing market h8 might not start the first home until 20UM. Since not all of the site improvements are onnnp|ete the city council 3hOU|d review this permit again in one year. This review will give staff and the property owner a chance to ensure that the project iSrneeting8||Citv ordinances and conditions Ofapproval. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit (CUp) for the Cottagewood PU[) again in one year or sooner if the owner proposes a major change to the site. 61111:8 Q **] N 12 1 Eel Z I Site size: 3.71 acres Existing land use: Townhouse development (under construction) ael I I Z I el I I, [e RI Im , nn lig North: New Century development across Highwood Avenue South: 1- 494 West: Single dwellings on Ferndale Street East: Single dwelling and cell phone tower Existing Land Use Plan designation: R-31 (low-density multiple dwelling) Existing Zoning: PUD (planned unit development Criteria for Conditional Use Permit Approval Section 44-1097(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. p:sec13-28\Cottagewood PUD review (2) - 2007 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Address Map 3. Land Use Map 4. Property Line/Zoning Map 5. Final Plat 6. August 28, 2006 City Council minutes VVDRI FT Cl ........... 77, Location Map Cottagewood 3 N Ln 1 VALLEY ' VIEW AVE 9,32 93, 943 940 953 9b3 Lu gg Lu LL 1007 1015 I 2 98 1000 1 (IM 1016 102A --:17 zQ c -657 6 ry e . ... ... 2,kxl4i 7,� f 6 2 ? F o 7 1 2 ,6 )o 622 —A F c F 264 'h2 r2o' 2 fi 264 26� 26 1.- 2 C48 HIGHVVOOD AVE 1024 N MITZ AVE ......... 351 I - Su 923 CENTURY LN .............. -7 F ---------- 1?'7 04 2 TI'4' 2 1 r 6 9 2.9 100 2 �6 . ............ . 1077 107 Address Map Cottagewood 4 N 64 64 ter 64 W! 64 Z t j HIGHWOOD AVE fl Q0 Cq '67 966 ---------- N EM ITZ AVE 1012 1018- 1024 Cell Tower Land Use Map Cottagewood 5 y. N 27 %081 653 262 684 26 - Rio 2 6 A 0 6 2 /1 2.660 2 651 68 f- - 1� j2764 2712 6 Fos 0 6 C/R AN 2058 0-02 2rl S 2649 . 270 0 t 2654 2 goo 64z— 2 9 2 2 � 074 2652' H4 2 5_1' ........... 2 9 . 64 2650 '2648 w 641 Z t HIGHWOOD AVE fl Q0 C HN 966 7 ........... y . -------- -- N EM ITZ AVE 1 012 I 1M. 1 1 024 1 Zoning Map Cottagewood 6 Attachment 5 R V` P 0" S E D F It I JA L PPP L A T Li N 7 4.r 3 "+ y �: - - - - - - - - - - - - - R V` P 0" S E D F It I JA L PPP L A T Li N 7 Attachment MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL Y:UOP.M. Monday, August 28,20O8 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting NO. 00-22 A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, and was called k} order ak 7:10 P.M. by Mayor Longrie. ROLL CALL Diana LVnQhH,Mayor Present Rebecca Cave Counni|nnernber Present Erik |heUe.Counoi|nnennber Present Kathleen JV9nenn8nn,CoUnci|nnennb9r Present Will Ro8sbSch.CounCi|nnennb8r Present 2. Cottagewood Subdivision Public Improvements, City Project 06-10 Public Hearing 7:10pnn Cott] Town Houses (28S0Hi hvvo0dAvaenue) Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Revision Preliminary Plat Resolution Ordering Improvement (4 votes) a. Environmental Manager Konewko presented the public improvement report. b. Civil Engineer Kummer provided further specifics from the report. C. Commissioner Pearson presented the Planning Commission report. d. Planner Roberts presented the project approval report. R. Phil Soby, the applicant, 200 East Chestnut Street, Stillwater, was present for council Mayor Longrie opened the public hearing (9:03 p.m.), calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Kip Johnson, Project Engineer for the Developer Chris G8[k8.280OHighvv0Od Avenue East, K88p|RvvOOd Sharon SOby. Realtor and applicants wife 9. Mayor Longrie closed the public hearing. Councilmember Cave moved to aporove the followinci resolution. This resolution approves a conditional use permit revision for a planned unit development for the property at 2666 Highwood Avenue to be known as Cottagewood. This site is on the south side of Highwood Avenue, east of Dennis Street. The city bases this approval on the findings required by code: City Council MeE@ng 08-28-06 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION 06-08-105 WHEREAS, Mr. Phil Sobv. representing thep jRotdSvS|Op8rS.GDDiedfor8CODdition8|Ua8 permit /CUP\ revision for the C0tt@g8vvOOd residential planned unit development (PU[}). WHEREAS, this permit applies Lo the C|8Lta0Hvv80d town house development plan the city received on July 7.20O8 for the property ot2880QighvvoOdAvenue. The legal description is: Subject tV State TH1O0/117 and HVVY383. the north 11OU feet [f the West 173 feet Vf the East 198 feet of the West Y2ofthe NE 1 /4nf the SE 1 /4ofSedion 13 Township 28. Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (This is the property tOb9 known @S Lots 1-15Of the proposed Cottog9vvoOd) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is8sfollows: 1. C}n August 7.20US. the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave persons at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The C0nl[niSSi0n also C0D3idenSd reports and [8COnnnlend@tionS of the city Staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the conditional use permit. 2. On August 28 2006. the city council discussed the proposed conditional use permit. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning Conn[niSSion and City Staff. NC)VV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described conditional use permit because: 1. The use vvoU|d be located, designed, maintained, constructed and 0p8n8t8d to be in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character Ofthe surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, prOC8SS. [n@t8ri8|S. equipment Or methods Of operation that would be d8nQ8n}uS, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause 8 nuisance to any person or property, b8c8VS8 of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor fUnn8S, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibradion, general unSiQht|ineSS, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use vvoV|d generate only nnininn8| vehicular traffic on k]C8| streets and vvVV|d not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 0. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including SLr88ts police and fire pn}teCUon, drainage sLnJ[tUpeS, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. Y. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. S. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. City Council MeIng 08-28-06 Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans for 4-9 15 detached town houses aa approved bv the city. The city council may approve major ch8ngestoLhep|ans.Th8[)ine{tVrCfCVnnrnUnih/ Development may approve minor changes tO the plans. Such changes shall include: 8. Revising the grading and site plans t0show: (1) The developer minimizing the |oGS or removal of natural vegetation. (2) All driveways at least 20 feet wide. If the developer wants to have parking on one side of the main driveway, then it must be at least 28 feet wide. However, widening of the driveway must not lessen the side setback Of the driveway from the east property line. /3\ All parking stalls with o width 0f8t least 0.5 feet and 8 length Ofotleast 18 feet. Also, review and possibly revise the parking spaces and the turn-around area 8Lthe south end [f the site to maximize the number of trees to be saved and to minimize the amount of hard surface area. Nl Revised storm water pond locations and designs as suggested Or required bvthe watershed district or city engineer. The ponds shall meet the city's design standards. UB The developer minimizing the loss Or removal of natural vegetation including keeping and protecting as many of the large trees in the undisturbed area south of the town houses and parking areas. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall meet all the conditions and changes noted in the engineer's memo dated July 28.2O06. These shall include: a. The grading e, erosion control, streets, trails, tree, retaining walls, drivewaV utility, drainag and Parkinci plans. This approval includes the desicin of the proposed private cul-de-sac. h. Showing Do grading o[ground disturbance iD the conservation easement. This land iGL0bR preserved for open space purposes. The developer and contractors shall protect this area, including the large trees that are in and near the south side of the site, from encroachment from equipment, grading or filling. C. Include 8 storm water management plan for the proposal. 4. The design of all ponds shall meet Maplewood's design standards and shall be subject to the 8ppn}v8| of the city engineer. If needHd, the developer shall be responsible for getting any off- site pond and drainage easements. 5. The developer 0r contractor shall: a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the ponds, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. City Council MeqVg 08-28-06 b. Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs 8tthegr8ding|irnd3. c. Remove any debris or junk from the site, including the conservation area. d Provide the city with verification that the town houses OD the proposed site plan will meet the state's noise standards. This shall be with @ study, testing O[ other documentation. |f the noise on this site is8 factor, then the contractor will have k] build the town houses so that they can meet the noise standards. This may be done with thicker walls, heavier windows, requiring air conditioning or other sound-deadening construction methods. The developer shall provide the city with this documentation before the city will issue a building permit for the town houses. 0. The approved setbacks for the principal sLrV[tVpe8 in the COttagevvoVd PU[) shall b8: a. Front-yard setback (frO[n o public street or private driveway): nnininlUnl - 20 feet, [nGni[nu[n —35feet b. Rear-yard setback: 12 feet from any adjacent residential property line c. Side-yard setback /k}vvn hnVSeS\: nnininnVnn of six feet from 8 Side property line and at least 12 feet between units. 7. The developer or builder will pay the city Park Access Charges (PAC fees) for each housing unit 8i the time of the building permit for each housing unit. B. Submit the homeowner's association documents to city staff for review and approval. 9. The developer shall provide 8 permanent means tVpreserve and maintain the common open space. This may be done by conservation easement, deed restrictions, covenants or public dedication. The developer shall record this document with the final plat and before the city issues 8 permit for grading or utility construction. 10. The city council shall review this p8rnn|L in one year. 11. This approval does not include the design approval for the tovvnhonoea or any signs. The project design p|an8, including 8n}hiLeCtVr8|. . site, lighting, tree and landscaping p|SnS, shall b9subject to review and approval of the community design review board (CDRB). The projects shall be subject to the following conditions: 8. Meeting all conditions and changes 8s required bythe city council. b. For the driveways: (1) K8ininnUnn width -2Ofeet. /2\ K8oxinlUnl width -28feet. (3) All driveways less than 28 feet in width Sh8|| be posted for "No Parking" on both sides. Driveways 8L least 28 feet wide may have parking on one side and shall b8 posted for No Parking oD one side. c. Showing all changes required by the city 8S part Vfthe conditional use permit for the planned unit development (PUD). City Council Meqlng 08-28-06 12. The city shall not issue any building permits for construction on an outlot (per city code requirements). The developer must record afin8| plat to create buildable lots in the preliminary plat before the city will issue a building permit. Seconded bv Mayor LOngrie Ayes-Mayor LODgh8.00uDd|[nRmberS Cave, Hel|S 8ndJU8O8nl@OO Mayor Longrie moved to approve the Cottagewood preliminary plat (received by the city on July 7, 2006). The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: 8. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.° Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs sdthegroding|inndo. c. Have Xce| Energy install Group rate street lights in two k]C8UOnS- primarily 8tthe street intersection and near the south end of the driveway. The exact style and location shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. d. Pay the city for the cost of tr8ffi[-contn}[ street identification and no parking signs. 8. Provide all required and necessary easements, including any off-site easements. t Demolish Vr remove the existing house and garage from the site, and remove all other buildings, fencing, trailers, scrap [n8t8| debris and junk from the site. 0. Cap and seal all wells 0n site that the owners are not using; remove septic systems or dr8infie|ds subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines. In. Complete all the curb and gutter on Highwood Avenue on the north side of the site. This is to replace the existing driveways on Highvvond Avenue and shall include the restoration and sodding of the boulevards. i |OStoU G sign where the new driveway iDt8rS8CtS 0ghvv0Od/\v8nU8 indicating that bis8 private driveway. i Install survey monuments and signs alon8theedgesofthenOnsenxatone8aennentore8. These signs sh@Uexp|8inth8tth88r8obevondtheaiQnSi38oDnserv8tione8aementare8and that there shall be no building, fences, mowing, cutting, filling, dumping or other ground disturbance in that area. The developer or contractor shall install these signs before the city iasU8S building permits in this plat. 2. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include Qn8ding. UU|8v dnBin8Q8 8n]G0n control, dhv8vv8y trail, tree, and street plans. The plans shall meet all the conditions and changes listed in the memo from Michael Thompson dated July 28.2008. and shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. City Council Meql2ig 08-28-06 b.The grading plan shall show: M\ The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each building site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. (3) Building pads that reduce the grading 0n sites where the developer can save large trees. (4) The proposed street and driveway grades as allowed by the city engineer. (5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. On slopes steeper than 3: 1, the developer shall prepare and implement a stabilization and planting plan. 4t8 nnin|nnUnn. the slopes Sh8|| be protected with wood-fiber blanket, be seeded with a no-maintenance vegetation and be stabilized before the city approves the final plat. (8) All retaining vv8||s on the o|8nS. Any retaining vva||G taller than four feet require a building permit from the city. The developer shall install 8 pnJtSCtw8 nGi| or fence On top of any retaining wall that is taller than four feet. (Y) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city engineer. (8) No grading beyond the plat boundary without temporary grading easements from the affected property owner(s). (9) As little grading as possible west and south of the town houses. This is to keep as many of the existing trees on the site as is reasonably possible. c. The street, driveway and utility plans shall show: /1\ The driveway shall b88 nine-ton design vvithannSxinnVnngr8d8[f8i htpercent8ndth8 maximum grade within 75 feet of the intersection at two percent. (2) The street (d with continuous concrete curb and gutter, except where the city engineer determines that curbing iG not necessary for drainage purposes. (3) The removal of the unused driveways and the completion of the curb and gutter on the south side of Highwood Avenue and the restoration and sodding of the boulevards. /4\ The coordination of the water main alignments and sizing with the standards and requirements of the Saint P8U| R80iODG| Water Services (SPRVVS). Fire f|Ovv requirements and hydrant locations shall be verified with the Maplewood Fire Department. (5) All utility excavations located within the proposed right-of-ways or within easements. The developer shall acquire easements for all utilities that would be outside the project @n38. (6) The plan and profiles of the proposed utilities. (7) A detail of any ponds, the pond outlets and the rainwater gardens. The contractor shall protect the outlets to prevent erosion. City Council Meql3ig 08-28-06 (8) The rninirnUrn cul-de-sac size to meet the public Smfeb/ needs while preserving as many trees 8spossible. d. The drainage plan shall ensure that there is no increase in the r8L8 of storm vx8L8r run-off leaving the site above the current /pr8deve|opnn8nU levels. The developer's engineer shall: (1) Verify inlet and pipe capacities. (2) Submit drainage design calculations. e.° The tree plan shall: (1) B9 approved, 8konovvithth9kandSc8 ing,bvUl9ConnnnVnitvO8SignRev8vvBVanU (C[)RB) before site grading or final plat approval. (2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan shall |ndUd8 an inventory of all existing large Lpe9S on the site. /3\ Show the size, species and location of the replacement and screening trees. The deciduous trees shall be8t least two and one half (2 Y2) inches in diameter and shall be8 mix Vf red and white oaks, ash, lindens, sugar maples or other native species. The coniferous trees shall b98tleast eight /8\ feet tall and shall be a mix of Black Hills Spruce, Austrian pine and other species. (4) Show no tree removal in the buffer zones, conservation easement, or beyond the approved grading and tree limits. /5\ Include for city staff a detailed tree planting plan and rnot8h8| list. /8\ Group the new trees together. These planting areas shall be: /8\ near the p0ndingareas (b) 0n the slopes (c) along the west side of the site LV screen the proposed buildings from the homes to the west 0 Show the planting of at least 37 trees after the site grading is done. 3. Change the plat as follows: 8./\dd drainage and utility easements 8s required bv the city engineer. This shall include showing a 20-foot-wide drainage and utility easement along the north side of Lot 15. b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines onthe final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. c. Label the common areas GSon0ut|OtorGS0Ut|{tS. d.|f allowed, show the conservation easement on the final plat. 4. Pay for costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction plans. 5. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including any off-site drainage and utility easements. These shall include, but not be limited to, an easement for the Cu|v8d draining the pond at the northwest C0rD9r of the plat. City Council Meqt4ngO8-28-0S 6.The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not connp|8L8d before final plat approval. 7. Sign a developer's agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site dr8in8g8, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. U.~ Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. C. Provide for the repair Of||ighvv0Od Avenue (st[88t. curb and gutter and boulevard) after the developer connects to the public utilities and builds the private driveway. 8. Record the hJ||ovvin0 with the final plat: a. All homeowner's association documents. b. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision or splitting of the lots or p@P:e|S in the plat that would CpR@tR additional building sites. t. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any additional driveways (besides the one new driveway shown on the project p|anS) fronnQoingonLoHighvvoodAv8nU8. d.lhe conservation easement for the undisturbed area of the site. The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the city for approval before recording. The city will not issue @ building permit until after the developer has recorded the final plat and these documents and covenants. 9* Submit the homeowners association bylaws and rules to the director of community development. These are to assure that there will be one responsible party for the maintenance of the oonnnnon areas, Out|ots private utilities, dhvevvoyS, retaining vvoUs and structures. 10. Obtain 8 permit from the Ramsey-Washington K8etn] Watershed District for grading. 11.K the developer decides hD final plat part 0f the preliminary plat, the interim director Of community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. 12. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues Ggrading permit or approves the final plat. Seconded by MayorLon0rie Ayes-Mayor Longh8. CoVnci|m8mbers Cave. Hjelle. andJUenennonn City Council Meq&g 08-28-06 Agenda Item K1 TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Planner SUBJECTS: Code Amendment -Planning Commission DATE: August 28 City staff, the city manager and the city attorney have reviewed the current city code about the duties of the planning commission and the planning commission's rules of procedure. They determined that some minor changes were necessary to the city code and to the rules of procedure to reflect the current practices of the City. As such, staff has prepared a code amendment for the sections of the code about the planning commission. Staff also is working on s8p8n8ie report about their nJ|8G of procedure. lKeftlellikill On March 12,2007 staff requested that the city council allow staff to review and amend the planning commission's rules Ofprocedure. City council directed city staff and the planning commission to make the recommended changes to the planning commission ordinance and rules of procedure and then to bring the items back to city council for review. {)n August 27 the city council gave the proposed ordinance first reading. The council requested a change to Section 2-251 about the scheduling of meetings. Staff has made the requested change in the attached ordinance. DISCUSSION Code Amendments Staff determined that a few amendments to the city ordinance about the planning commission were necessary t008kSthS0consiStent with the recent direction Of the city manager and k}b8 consistent with current city staff organization. The proposed changes include the following: Sec. 2-249. Chairperson and vice-chairperson. — The election ofo chairperson and vice-chairperson now occurs GODUoUy Gt the second planning C0[nnlisSi0O nnR8Ung in January. This does not allow all 0fthe commission members k} vote 0nthese appointments because two of the commission members terms expire annually. The proposed code as shown in attachment 1 (page four) changes the election ho the first meeting inJune annually, thus enabling all commission members tnvote. Sec. 2-251. Officers; meetings; rules of procedure (a). — Staff iS proposing Gn addition tV the proposed code about meeting times for the planning commission. The newly added section (see page four) allows for meeting times to be in conjunction with the 8v8i|8bi|iiv of city facilities and the meeting times of other groups as directed by the city manager. Sec. 2-254. Responsibilities of communitV development director. -As directed bvthe city manager, the title 0f this section needed tOb8 changed ho reflect current organization of the departments within the city. In addition, staff is proposing tVchange CnrnrnVnitv d8v8|Vpnn8nt director to city planning staff throughout this section (see page COMMISSION ACTION On July 17, 2007, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed code change. RECOMMENDATION Approve the second reading of the proposed code amendment starting on page three. This amendment changes Sections 2-248 through 2-2550f the city code about the planning COnnnnisSiOn. P:\(zC) Planning Commission Code Amendment Memo 07(l) Attachments 1. Proposed City Code Amendment - Planning Commission 2 Attachment 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING DIVISION 4. PLANNING COMMISSION The Maplewood city council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed 0Ut): DIVISION 4. PLANNING COMMISSION* Sec. 2-246. Established. The city council establishes for the city a planning commission as an advisory board to the city council, as provided in Minn. Stots. §§462.351-462.3S4. (Code 1982.§ 25-17) Sec. 2-247. Advisory body; exceptions. All actions of the advisory planning commission shall be in the nature of recommendations to the city council, and the commission shall have no final authority about any matters, except 8s the council may lawfully delegate authority LOit. (Code 1S82.G25-18\ State law reference— City planning agency to be advisory, except as otherwise provided by state statute or charter, Minn. St8ts. 8 462.354 GUbd. 1. Sec. 2-248. Composition; appointment; qualifications; terms. (@) The planning COrnnniS3iOn Sh8]| have nine nlen1b8[3 appointed by the city COUnCi|. The members shall bR residents Of the city and may not hold GO elected city public office. When pVssib|e, the council shall select commission members tO represent the various areas Of the city and tO help meet the needs of the residents. (b) The city council shall appoint 080b800fth8DlanDirg commission for three- year t8rnls. The city Gh8U divide the membership into three groups of three members each. The terms of the three members in the same group shall end in the same year. |f the appointment isto fill 8 vacancy, the appointment would b8tV finish the unexpired part of the vacated terms. All terms shall expire On December 31 of the year in which the appointment ends. (Code 1982.§25-19) Sec. 2-249. Chairperson and vice-chairperson. The planning commission shall elect a chairperson and a vice-chairperson each year during the first plannina commission meetinci in June. at the seGGRd p The chairperson shall be responsible for calling and presiding at meetings and shall have an equal vote with other members of the commission. |f the chairperson iS not 8ta meeting, the vice-chairperson shall assume the duties Vf the chairperson for that meeting. |f the chairperson resigns from Or is otherwise no longer on the planning commission, the vice-chairperson shall become the acting chairperson until the planning commission can hold an election for new officers. (Code 19R2.§ 25-20) *State law references—K8unidpo| planning, Minn. Stots. §4G2.351 edSeq.; city planning @08noy. Minn. Gtota. § 462.354. SUbd. 1; D1etR]DV|it@D gVve[ODl8Dt Minn. 8L8tS ch. 473; Ramsey County included within "metropolitan area" over which "metropolitan council" has jurisdiction, Minn. 8t@tS.G473.121 SUbdS. 2 3; D1etn]pV|it@0 land use planning, Minn. St8tS. 8473.851etseq. ADMINISTRATION Sec. 2-250' Vacancies. (a) Any of the following may cause the office of8 planning commissioner to become vacated: M\ Death Vr removal from the city. (2) Disability or failure to S8rv8. as Sh0vvO by failure t0 attend four [n8RtiOgS in any year, may be cause for removal bvcouncil majority, Un|8ssQVod cause can be shown tO the council. (3) Resignation in writing. (4) Taking public office in the city. (b) Vacancies shall be filled by the council for the unexpired portion of the vacated term. (Code 1882.825-21) Sec. 2-251. Officers; meetings; rules of procedure. (a) The planning commission shall elect its own officers, establish regularly scheduled meeting times and dates in coniunction with the availability o city facilities and the meeting times of other groups as directed by the city manage . and adopt its own rules of procedure b>b8 reviewed and approved by the city council. 4 (b) All meetings ofthe planning commission shall b9 open bJ the public. Sec. 2-252. Duties and responsibilities. The planning conlrniSsk]n Sh8U have the duty to: (1) Prepare and recommend o comprehensive plan of development for the city. /2\ Conduct hearings and make recommendations ho the city council about the adoption 0f the city comprehensive plan and any amendments thereto. The comprehensive plan certified and adopted by the city council shall be recognized 8S the city's official comprehensive plan. (3) Study and make recommendations to the city council about implementing the comprehensive plan and any land use regulations. (4) Study and make recommendations to the city council about zoning code amendments. (5) Review, prepare and make 8 report tO the city council bv the second city council meeting |n February of each year regarding the commission's activities in the past year and major projects for the new year. (6) Maintain 8 liaison and coordination with government and private agencies SV that the city council may b8 familiar with the planning activities of such agencies in order t0 establish @n order of planning and development unity for the city. (7) Review and recommend, OnOr before June 3O0f each year, ocapital improvements program tV the city council, which is designed b] accomplish the comprehensive plan for the city. (8) Review and make recommendations k} the city council ondevelopment applications, such oSrezOningS. conditional use permits, variances, vacations, preliminary plats and home occupation licenses. (0) Accept such other and further duties @S may, from time tO time, b8 directed bv the city council, including conducting hearings. (Code 1082.Q25-23\ Sec. 2-253. Compensation; expenses. All members of the planning commission shall serve without compensation. However, approved expenses of the planning commission shall be paid from available Sec. 2-254. Responsibilities of city planning staff Gommui;ity develepmeR4 Subject to the direct of the city manager, the planning commission and its chairperson, the city planning staff GGMMURity deVelOpMeRt diFeGtG shall: (1) Conduct all correspondence Of the commission. C2\ Send out all required notices. (3) Attend all meetings and hearings of the commission. (4) Keep the dockets and minutes of the cOnnnni3SiOn'S proceedings. (5) Keep all required records and files. (6) Maintain the files and indexes of the commission. Sec. 2-255. Duties of city engineer city attorney city inspectors mndmkhercity (a) The city engineer and the city attorney shall b8 available LV the planning SOnnrnisai0n. The city engineer and attorney sha have the right tn sit in with the commission 8t all meetings, but shall not b8 entitled LVvote as members of the commission. (b) All city inspectors and other regular employees or personnel of the city shall cooperate with the planning commission and make themselves available and attend meetings when requested tOd0so. (Code 1S82.§25-2W) Secs. 2-256-2-280. Reserved' This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 2007. Attest: City Clerk Mayor � Agenda Item K2 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: CharleS/\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer Tom Ekst[@Dd Senior Planner SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Updates, Consider Contracts with Schoell Madison for Phase I of Land Use Plan Components and Phase I of Parks, Trails and Open Space Component and with Ki00ley-Horn for Transportation Component DATE: August 31 INTRODUCTION At the August 13, 2007 meeting, the City Council tabled consideration of retaining consultant services for preparation of various phases of the Comprehensive Plan tV allow for coordination and review Vf previous consultant work bvstaff. Planning and engineering staff have worked with a number of the consultants and have prepared a program to begin the preparation of the first phases of the overall work. Background The Council considered a recommendation to begin the Parks, Trails and Open Space portion of the Comprehensive Plan with the firm of SCho8UMadson along with 8n updating Vf nine components ofthe overall Comprehensive Plan On August 13.2O07. SChO8UK8GdSODia the firm selected through 8 competitive pnJD8sS h3 prepare the Comprehensive Land Use Study GS part of the South K88p|SvvOOd Moratorium process. The staff had been working with various firms [URS, SEH and Kimley-Horn (KHA)] through the engineering consultant pool for preparation Of the Transportation Component Of the Comprehensive Plan aSit related k} Legacy Village. Kimley-Horn was retained in 2003 to assist with the Transportation Plan as part of that process. The other firms, URS and 8E||. because Cf their involvement in area projects intheyN8p|8vvoVd Mail area, and because they were part of the City's consultant pool, had various tasks within their projects to assist with the Transportation Plan preparation, although KHA had the overall coordination task. City planning and engineering staff met with Schoell Madson representatives and KHA representatives 0J coordinate the overall project SC0p8bO8vOiddup|icoti0nOfS8rviC9S. Planning and Engineering staff did not consider returning to8 full competitive solicitation process for these services. The reasons include the background information that Schoell Madson has with the South Maplewood Study that will be a large component of the Comprehensive Planning and the major background information that KHA has from the 28U3 study work that they have completed. Additionally, KHAi8 currently 8n active member Uf the City's consultant pool and assisted staff in the preparation of the Sewer Study Component of the Comprehensive Plan in2003iO consultation with SE||. Each 0f these processes looked 8to competitive solicitation Offirms for the studies. B8c8USH this is G professional service, the C0rnp8{iLive selection is not governed by the |0vv bid requirements but nevertheless involves selection of the most effective professionals involved in the overall process and the competitive nature of the pool provides for the lowest cost overall plan. The staff did not S9|8[t a professional firm at the lowest cost for the work, but S8|9CtS based upon the best work scope while also considering the cost of the service given the scope of work proposed by the submittal from the consultant. Given each Vfthe firms current involvement in on-going work, it does not appear appropriate, nor iGiL recommended bythe staff, that the process b8 stopped and opened for 8competitive selection process. Agenda Item K2 Comprehensive Plan Page Two Proposal Review The process for preparation of a Comprehensive Plan needs to begin with the growth and development assumptions prior to the final determinations within the other components. For example, iLisnot appropriate t0 complete the work ofthe Parks, Trails and Open Space or Transportation component without the knowledge from the growth component Vf the Land Use study. Each Vf these components must work inunison. ACVop8nSUve effort with 8ChVe||K88USOn and hiHA will provide for the best Comprehensive Plan. Work is proposed in phases to allow check points and updates as necessary and to still meet the June 20U8 completion date required by the Metropolitan Council. The proposals will build upon the preliminary submittals ofSch0e||K8adaon from August 13 m and the work already completed bv K||Aon the Sewer Study and Transportation Study completed since 2003. The work authorizations and recommendations include the following: 1. Retain 8choeUMadsonto prepare Phase |of the Land Use Component at8cost of $8,020. This work will be the background m basis for work to be completed on all other phases of the Comprehensive Plan and should be the first step of the work. AS noted in the attached proposal from Schoell Madson, this work is the beginning of a more comprehensive process in 2008. C0OndiD@ti0O work with the other consultants will n8Su|t in 8 C0nlp|8b3d pnJg[8Qn by June 2008. This scope Vf work |s estimated t0complete only 1 /4nf the formal process. An additional authorization late in20070r early in2008 will be necessary bJ complete the study. 2. Retain Schoell Madson to prepare Phase I of the Parks, Trails and Open Space portion of the Comprehensive Plan in the amount $13.810. This process will provide Schn8||K8SdSVn with the lead Vf the plan 8S noted on August 13 m butvviUinC|udevvVrkonth8tr8i|SconnpVnentbyP(HA. The attached work plan proposes approximately % of the work to be completed in 2007. Included would be 8 rnU|Li-c0rnnnissi0n task force, including rnernb8rS appointed by the Park Commission, Environment and Natural Resources Commission, Historic Preservation Commission and o South Maplewood resident. Staff iS suggesting the following Task Force make up: 2 Park Commission, 2 ENR, 1 Historic PneservaUon, 1 Planning CVnnnnisSiVn K88nnber, 1 CORB Member and 4 K8ap|8vvVOd citizen members for @ total Task Force Of11. SchO8||K8@dS0n would provide the support tOthe Task Force along with City staff. 3. Retain Kirn|8y-Morn/KHA\in the amount [f $9,800 to complete the Transportation Component 0f the Comprehensive Plan and assist with the Trails portion of the Parks, Trails and Open Space plan. The attached scope of work from KHA identifies the work to be completed. 4. The Water Resources portion of the Comprehensive Plan has been previously covered in the work scope with SEH as part of the Non-degradation Study previously authorized by the Council. Work Summary * $ 8.020 -SnhneUK8odenn— Phase |of Land Use Plan component * $13.81U—Sohne||K4odaon— Phase |nf Parks, Trails and Open Space component * $ 9.8OU—Kimn|ny-Honl— Transportation and Trails Component * —8EH— Water Resources Component — previously authorized ° $31,630 — Total Project Cost ° - the SEH work is included in funding for the Non-Degradation Study required to be completed by December 2007. SEH will provide support to the other firms to complete this chapter of the work. Agenda Item K2 Comprehensive Plan Page Three Budget Impact The funding for portions of this work was not included as a line item in the 2007 budget. |tiS proposed that only the first phases of the work, necessary tobe completed in20OY.be authorized 8L this time. FViUr8 resources will b8 included in the 20U8 budget for completion of the plan. Funding is recommended 8G * $8,020 to be funded from City Planning budget MU1-01 —funds needed * $13.810LVLe funded from Park Dedication fees [PAC fund 4U3] 0 $9,800 to be funded from Public Works Administration [101 funds available It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Director 0fPublic VVOrkG/CUv Engineer to retain the following consulting firms for Phase I of the Comprehensive Plan as noted: 1. Retain GchVUMadsonto prepare Phase |of the Land Use Component at8cost of $8�20. 2. Retain Schoell Madson to prepare Phase I of the Parks, Trails and Open Space portion of the Comprehensive Plan iD the amount $13.810. 3. Retain Kirn|8y-WVrn/KH4Jin the amount [f $9,800 to complete the Transportation Component 0f the Comprehensive Plan and assist with the Trails portion of the Parks, Trails and Open Space Attachment: 1 acho|Madmm Proposal for Land Use Component - Sept 10, 2007 z. SohoonMmdomn Proposal for Parks, Trails and Open Space - Sept 1O.20O7 a. mm|oy'Hom Scope or Work for Transportation Component ii� �111111q�111111111q irm Far Scope of Work (Comprehensive Plan Elements) F0111=1 1 ) Introduction 2) City History 3) City Goals 4) Natural Features 5) Analysis of Population, Housing and Employment 6) Land Use 7) Housing 8) Historic Resources 9) Implementation (portions only) Schoell Madson will work with Kimley-Horn and SEH for the Engineering chapters, specifically related to the Transportation (Kimley-Horn) plan and the elements that tie into the Parks, Trails and Open Space component. This effort will be a part of phase one of the plan. Once the land use component is complete, we will then work with the other consultants for the sewer, water and transportation elements (which all stem from the land use plan). We expect this coordinated effort to occur early 2008 as part of the second phase of the planning effort. Work Plan Budget (all figures before Comprehensive Plan Components exclude the Parks, Trails and Open Space Section) Phase k Year 2007 (114 of the plan) Project Initiation • Meetings with staff (two persons-two meetings) .... ......................$1,320.00 Systems Statement Analysis & Data Gathering • In-house project management .......................... ......................$3,500.00 (project management for entire process) Mapping • GIS work for the entire plan .............................. ......................$3,200.00 ff"07 Phase I/: Year 2008 (314 of the plan) Public input • Website Work ........................................................................ $660.00 • Internal Staff Meetings (two persons-three meetings) ...................$1,980.00 • One Open House (two persons-one meeting) ....... ......................$2,100.00 (includes all preparations) • City Council Workshops (one person-four meetings) ....................$1,320.00 • Historic Commission (one person-one meeting) ..... ........................$330.00 • Environmental and Nat. Res. Commission (one person-one meeting)$330.00 • Planning Commission (one person-three meetings) ........................$990.00 • Redevelopment Authority (one person-one meeting) ......................$330.00 • City Council (two persons-four meetings) ............. ......................$2,640.00 Comprehensive Plan Component • Introduction Section ................................................. ............... $660.00 • City History ......................... ....... .........$ • City Goals ........................................................................... $1,200.00 • Natural Features .................................................................. $3,200.00 • Analysis of Population, Housing and Employment . ......................$3,750.00 • Land Use ............................................................................ $7,500.00 • Housing .............................................................................. $1,200.00 • Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces . ...........................(see separate proposal) • Historic Resources ................................................................. $220.00 • Implementation .................................................................... $3,000.00 (Includes Cl P, Ordinances, Grant Research) Total: $31,520.00 Project Total: $39,540.00 Assumptions: The figure for the land use component is based on an update to the existing plan without any redevelopment studies or other significant work related to creating new land use designations for the land use section. Schoell Madson assumes, and expects, there to be discussion related to these additional studies and can put together proposals for additional work as needed. Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan Update (note: this Plan is a required part of the Comprehensive Plan but due to the current community activity and declared importance, we are proposing to begin this Chapter early in the process) Schoell Madson proposes the scope of the project to consist of the following items: Create a Parks, Trails, and Open Space Task Force (City to determine composition and number of people) 2). Task Force ManagerVient 3). Staff Meetings 4). Open House Meeting 5). Initial Park Commission Meetings 6). Analyze current plan for all components and any new regional planning requirements 7). Field work for determination of new corridors 8). Mapping 9). Draft Plan 10). Prepare for and attend Commissions and Council meetings 11). Final Plan 12). Implementation Plan and Grant Research Our first step would be to compile all the work that was done before by other consultants and the City and then determine the best approach for the update of the plan. The focus will be transportation-type connections between the existing recreational amenities in the City to form a system of parks, trails and open spaces, whether City or County owned as well as implementation tools to accomplish the connection goals. Schoell-ff-ladson proposes this project to begin in September, 2007 as a part • the phase one of the project with an expected completion date of tarly 2008, project manager is Paul Schroeder. LW Phase 1. 2007 (314 of the plan) 1) Create a Parks, Trails, and Open Space Task Force (City to determine composition and number of people) 2) (6 meetings + meeting preparation and materials) • Meeting Preparation .................$1,250.00 • 6 Meetings (2-hours each) ......... $1,980.00 3) Staff Meetings • (two persons-three meetings).....$1,980.00 4) Park & Envr/Nat Res. Commission Meetings • (one person-two meetings) .......... $660.00 5) Open House ..... ......................$1,000.00 6) Analyze current plan for all components and any new regional planning requirements • $1,640.00 7) Field work for determination of new corridors (expectation to have assistance from City) • $2,700.00 8) Mapping • $2,600.00 Total Phase 1: $13,810.00 Phase H: 2008 (114 of the plan) 9) Draft Plan • $4,700.00 10) Prepare for and attend Commissions and Council meetings • (one person-three meetings) ....... $990.00 10) Final Plan • $2,400.00 11) Implementation Plan, CIP and Grant Research and applications (does not include application procedures) • $1,800.00 Total Phase 11: $9,890.00 INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ORDER NUMBER 8A Describing a specific agreement between Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. (the Consultant), and the City of Maplewood (the Client) in accordance with the terms of the Master Agreement for Continuing Professional Services dated December 9, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference. Identification of Project: Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update City Project 03 -30 General Category of Services: Transportation Planning Services Specific Scope of Basic Services: Provide additional services to complete an update of the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan as detailed in the attached Scope of Services (Exhibit A). Additional Services if Required: None identified at this time. Deliverables: Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update Method of Compensation: To be billed on an hourly (cost plus) basis as detailed in the attached Estimated Costs summary (Exhibit B). Schedule: See attached Project Schedule (Exhibit C) Special Terms of Compensation: None Other Special Terms of Individual Project Order: None ACCEPTED: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BY: TITLE: DATE: KRVILEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. I� TITL DATE: 8-halO7 rev 2102 1 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ORDER (IPO) NO. 8A COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE CITY PROJECT 03 -30 IPO No. 8 included Kimley -Horn services to assist the City of Maplewood with an update of your Comprehensive Transportation Plan to include proposed changes in the transportation system in the area of the Maplewood Mall. Some of the services identified in IPO No. 8 were performed in 2003; however a complete update of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan was not finished based upon direction from City staff. The City of Maplewood is currently in the process of preparing their 2008 Comprehensive Plan update as required by the Metropolitan Council. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan update will include an update of the City's Land Use Plan. The City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan must be updated to include the proposed changes in the City's Land Use Plan. Schoell Madson is preparing the update of the Land Use Plan. City staff has requested that Kimley -Horn provide additional services beyond those identified in IPO No. 8 to prepare the Comprehensive Transportation Plan update. The following is a summary of the specific additional tasks included as a part of this IPO. 1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update Kimley -Horn will review the proposed changes in the Land Use Plan prepared by Schoell Madson and update the Comprehensive Transportation Plan to include the Land Use changes. We have assumed that this will include an update of the Traffic Analysis Zones (TA-Z's). We have assumed that these services will also include attendance at up to four (4) additional meetings with City staff, the City Council, the Planning Commission, and/or Schoell Madson. We have assumed that the update will not require any new traffic modeling or analysis. 2. Bikeway and Trails Map Kimley -Horn will assist Schoell Madson in the preparation of the Bikeway and Trails Map to be completed as a part of the Comprehensive Plan update. We understand that Schoell Madson will have the primary responsibility to prepare the Bikeway and Trails Map and that Kimley -Horn will complete the following tasks to assist Schoell Madson: A. Provide electronic (AutoCAD) alignment information for the following trail segments: • The Bruce Vento Trail extension in the area of County Road D. rev 2102 • The extension of the Lake Links Trail from Hazelwood Street to Southlawn Drive. We will also provide background information to Schoell Madson for proposed trail alignments in the Gladstone Redevelopment area and in south Maplewood in the area of the Copar development. B. We will attend up to three (3) meetings with City staff and/or Schoell Madson and one (1) open house meeting. rev 1142 EXHIBIT B ESTIMATED COSTS INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ORDER (IPO) NO. 8A COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE CITY PROJECT 03 -30 Kimley -Horn proposes to perform all services for the project on an hourly (cost plus) basis using our current Standard Hourly Rate Schedule. The following is a summary of the estimated costs for the services included in this IPO. 1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update IPO No. 8 included a total estimated fee of $15,000 for this task. We propose that the total estimated fee be increased by $6,200 to include the additional services included in this IPO. The total revised estimated fee for this task is, therefore, $21,200. 2. Bikeway and Trails Map The estimated fee to complete these tasks is $3,000. 3. Reimbursable Expenses Reimbursable expenses (copy /printing charges, plotting, mileage, delivery charges, faxes, etc.) will be charged as an office expense at 6.0% of the labor fee. IPO No. 8 included an estimated amount of $825 for the reimbursable expenses. We propose that the total estimated amount for the reimbursable expenses be increased by $600 to include the additional services included in this IPO. The total revised estimated amount for the reimbursable expenses is, therefore, $1,425. The total estimated cost for the services and expenses included in this IPO is, therefore, $9,800. rev 2102 4 EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ORDER (IPO) NO. 8A COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE CITY PROJECT 03 -30 Work shall be completed based upon a schedule agreed upon with the City of Maplewood and coordinated with Schoell Madson. A preliminary schedule for the project is as follows: Begin Work September 17, 2003 Draft Bikeway and Trails Map Complete January 2008 Draft Transportation Plan Update Complete April 2008 Final Transportation Plan Update Complete May 2008 rev 2/02 Agenda Item K3 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer Michael Thompson, Civil Engineer 11 SUBJECT: Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-15 1. Approve Resolution for Adoption of Assessment Roll DATE: August 28, 2007 INTRODUCTION On August 27th, 2007, the city council received three (3) assessment objections for the Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvement assessment hearing. These objections were included in the report to council for the August 27th, 2007 meeting and no additional objections were made prior to or at that city council meeting. Therefore recommendations for action on each of the three objections are provided for the council to revise or confirm the final assessment roll for the project. I ME= The proposed assessments for the Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements were submitted to the city council for adoption at the August 27th, 2007 meeting. Residents were provided with the required 14-day advanced notice of the city's intent to levy the assessments, and the residents were required to file a written notice if they objected to the assessment amount. Three (3) property owners provided written objection as follows: 1. Parcel 10.29.22.44.0027 — Robert F. Parsons; 2229 Prosperity Road Mr. Parsons objects to the assessment based upon senior citizen financial hardship. 2. Parcel 10.29.22.44.0056 — Dorothy Sleva; 1680 Lark Avenue E Mrs. Sleva objects to the assessment based upon senior citizen financial hardship. 3. Parcel 11.29.22.33.0001 —Joe Fleming; 2271 White Bear Avenue N Mr. Fleming objects to the assessment based upon the usable Lark Ave front frontage. The two property owners requesting hardship or senior citizen deferments will be mailed an application packet. Letters were mailed to all three owners stating city staff's recommendation to the council for the September 10 2007 city council meeting and that they should attend the meeting if they would like to further speak to the city council on this matter. Recommended Adjustments The following action is recommended on each objection request: 1. Parcel 10.29.22.44.0027 — Robert F. Parsons; 2229 Prosperity Road Mr. Parsons objects to the assessment based upon senior citizen/financial hardship. Staff recommendation is to deny cancellation of assessment and grant deferral upon approval of necessary paperwork. Agenda Item K3 2. Parcel 10.29.22.44.0056 — Dorothy Sleva; 1680 Lark Avenue E Dorothy Sleva objects to the assessment based upon senior citizen/financial hardship. Staff recommendation is to grant deferral upon approval of necessary paperwork. 3. Parcel 11.29.22.33.0001 — Joe Fleming; 2271 White Bear Avenue N Mr. Fleming is requesting a revision of his assessment based upon the usable Lark Avenue front frontage. Staff recommendation is to grant a revision of the front footage used to calculate the assessment along Lark Avenue. The revised front footage was calculated by connecting both ends of the property with a straight line and using the straight line distance. The revised distance was found to be 81 feet, a reduction of 17 feet from the original 98 feet. This amounts to a $1,686.40 assessment reduction for a revised total assessment of $8,035.20. A full cancellation of the assessment is not appropriate as this business does receive benefit from the roadway as access is provided to the neighborhood, even though the business has three roadways that provide service to the facility. BUDGET IMPACT The project budget will not be affected by approving the recommendations above to defer the two assessments and to revise the one assessment. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached Resolution for the Adoption of the Assessment Roll for the Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-15. Attachments: 1, Resolution: Adoption of the Assessment Roll 2. Assessment Roll 3. Location Map 4. Assessment objections (3) ADJUSTMENTS TO ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to8resolution adopted by the City Council OD August 27,2OO7,the assessment roll for the Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Project O7-15.vv8spreGentedin8 Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, three (3)property owners filed objections to their assessments according to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 428, summarized aSfollows: 1. Parcel 10.29.22/41.UO27— Robert F. Parsons; 222S Prosperity Road k8c Parsons objects hOthe assessment based upon senior citizen financial hardship. 2. Parcel 1O.20.22/44.0050— Dorothy Gkev8;108O Lark Avenue E Mrs. Sleva objects to the assessment based upon senior citizen financial hardship. 3. Parcel 11.29.22.33.0001 — Joe Fleming; 2271 White Bear Avenue N Mr. Fleming objects to the assessment based upon the usable Lark Ave front frontage. A. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed tomake the following adjustments to the assessment roll for the Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-15: 1. Parcel 1U.29.22.44.O[27—Robert F. Parsons; 2229 Prosperity Road Mc Parsons objects to the 8SS8GSrnent based upon s8nk]rcdiz8n/fin8n[iG| hardship. Staff recommendation iatodeny cancellation nf assessment and grant deferral upon approval of necessary paperwork. 2. Parcel 10.20.22.44.O058— Dorothy SbevG;18OO Lark Avenue E Dorothy Sleva objects to the assessment based upon senior citizen/financial hardship. Staff recommendation is to grant deferral upon approval of necessary paperwork. 3. Parcel 11.28.22.33.0001 —Joe Fleming; 2271 White Bear Avenue N Mc Fleming is requesting 8 revision of his assessment based upon the usable Lark /\v8nV8 front frontage. Staff rmuonnnnGndedion is to grant a revision of the front footage used to calculate the assessment along Lark Avenue. The revised front footage was calculated by connecting both ends o[ the property with G straight line and using the straight line distance. The revised distance was found to be 81 feet 8 reduction of 17 feet from the original 08 feet. This amounts to a $1,686.40 assessment reduction for a revised total assessment of $8.035'20' B. The assessment roll for the Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements, Gs amended, ishereby accepted, a copy of which ia attached hereto and made a part hereof. Said assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. C. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first installments to be payable 0n0r before the first Monday in January 20U8 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.0 percent per annum for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall b8 added interest Vn the entire assessment from the date [f this resolution until December 31.2O0Y. TV each subsequent installment when due shall U8 added interest for one year Onall unpaid iOSt@||nl8ntS. O. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, but no later than October 1, 2007, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the office of the city engineer, except that no interest shall Ue charged if the entire assessment is paid within 3Odays from the adoption Uf this resolution; and they may, at any time after October 1, 2007, pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued L0 December 31 of the year in which such payment is rn8d8. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. E. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after October 1, 2007, but no later than November 15 m , 2007, transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists Of the county. Such assessments shall b9 collected and paid over the same manner 8s other municipal taxes. Adopted by the council on this 1 oth day of September 2007 LARKIPROSPERITY AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL CITY PROJECT 07 -15 2007 ASSESSMENT RATES: RESIDENTIAL STORM SEWER = $820.001UNIT RESIDENTIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $4,960.001UNIT RESIDENTIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $3,700.00 /UNIT COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER = $16.401FRONT FOOT COMMERCIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $99.201FRONT FOOT COMMERCIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = S74.00 /FRONT FOOT NOTES: 'PROPERTIES LABELED "NJA" WERE PREVIOUSLY ASSESSED FOR STORM SEWER UNDER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CITY PROJECTS: (COPE UTILITIES DP 159. ASSESSED 1971) : (COUNTY DITCH 17 - PROJECT 74 -18. ASSESSED 19781 (FOOTPRINT LAKE STORM - PROJECT 87 -32. ASSESSED 1991) PARCEL ID TAXPAYER STREET NUMBER STREET RESIDENTIAL UNITS COMMERCIAL FRONT FOOTAGE STORM ASSESSMENT' STREET ASSESSMENT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 102922440037 COPE AVE. PROFESSIONAL BLDG 1714 COPE AVENUE E 124 N/A $9,176.00 $9,176.00 102922440004 DENNIS R TRAMPE 1736 COPE AVENUE E - 124 N/A $9,176.00 $9,176.00 102922440096 PATRICIA J HAAG 1665 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430021 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD KENNARD STREET N - - - - - 102922440058 NATHAN BLEYLE 1666 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440044 KEVIN M MCLAFFERTY 1673 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440057 ROBERT A WAS] LUK 1674 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440045 LAWRENCE J PEIL ETAL 1679 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440056 DOROTHY P SLEVA 1680 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440046 MARK J CHANNER 1685 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440055 MARJORIE G LEE 1686 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440047 LARRY L BEWLEY 1693 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440054 GLADYSANN SANDSTROM 1694 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440048 WALLACE L NEUMAN 1699 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440053 DARRELL E ANDERSON 1700 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440049 GORDON A ANDERSON ETAL 1705 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440052 JOSEPH A OBRIEN 1706 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440050 SHELLY A LARSON 1713 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440051 SHAWN GREGORY 1714 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440007 TODD BRUNS 1725 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $3,700.00 $3,700.00 102922440021 KAREN J TETU 1726 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440008 AMY L SLOPER 1733 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440020 RALPH F FELLER 1734 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440009 MERLYN J ADER 1739 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440019 BERTIN BARRERA QUINTERO 1742 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440010 KEITH M ESALA 1745 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440018 LAWRENCE G JANSEN 1750 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440011 AKINTUNDE ODUWAIYE 1751 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440017 THOMAS E LABEY 1758 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440012 DAVID C SACKETT 1759 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440016 JUANITA M GUSTAVSON 1764 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440013 KEVIN L THOMPSON 1765 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440015 FELETI MOIMOI 1774 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440014 JAMES P GLASSEL 1775 LARK AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440059 CHRISTINE NOVAK 1665 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430022 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD LAURIE ROAD E 102922440073 DONALD J KAREL 1666 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440060 MARY KAY TRACY 1673 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440072 LORETTA L FARRAR 1674 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440061 ELSIE N ANDERSON 1679 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440071 BRIAN D RAU 1680 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440062 GERALD D BIBEAU 1685 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440070 EDITH L WALDVOGEL 1686 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440063 PHILIP C BURDINE 1693 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440069 JAMES A MCCUSKER 1694 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440064 ROBERT W NIELSEN 1699 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440068 JAMES D NEWTON 1700 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440065 RUSSELL W ANDERSON 1705 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440067 BETTY C KRENZ 1712 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440066 EDWARD P ROMAN 1713 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440022 JAMES J PRAML 1725 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440034 RICHARD M PRUDEN 1726 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440023 RICHARD F BORK 1733 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440033 JOHN A KLENK 1734 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440024 JEFFREY J LIBEL 1741 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440025 COLLEEN M GAICHAS 1745 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440026 THOMAS G VONWALTER 1755 LAURIE ROAD E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440027 ROBERT F PARSONS 2229 PROSPERITY ROAD 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440028 LON L FEIA 2223 WHITE BEAR AVE N 230 N/A 522,816.00 $22.816.00 102922440032 THAI THOA 2215 PROSPERITY ROAD 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440031 ROBERT EMERSON 2225 PROSPERITY ROAD N 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440030 GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC. 2165 WHITE BEAR AVE N - 579 N/A $57,436.80 $57.436.80 102922440029 PATRICK ALLEN OTT 2225 WHITE BEAR AVE N - 176 N/A $17,459.20 $17.459.20 102922430038 ANN M ROGERS 1610 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430026 BENJAMIN N HICKMAN 1613 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430037 DONALD L COLBERT ET AL 1616 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430027 JOSEPH L TIMMERS 1621 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430036 ESTHER M HARRIS 1622 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430028 RICHARD F CARLE 1627 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430035 ERWIN H YOUNGS 1630 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 1 of 2 LARKIPROSPERITY AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL CITY PROJECT 07 -15 2007 ASSESSMENT RATES: RESIDENTIAL STORM SEWER = $820.001UNIT RESIDENTIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $4,960.001UNIT RESIDENTIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $3,700.00 /UNIT COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER = $16.40/FRONT FOOT COMMERCIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $99.201FRONT FOOT COMMERCIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = S74.00/FRONT FOOT NOTES: 'PROPERTIES LABELED "NJA" WERE PREVIOUSLY ASSESSED FOR STORM SEWER UNDER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CITY PROJECTS: (COPE UTILITIES DP 159. ASSESSED 1971) : (COUNTY DITCH 17 - PROJECT 74 -18. ASSESSED 19781 (FOOTPRINT LAKE STORM - PROJECT 87 -32. ASSESSED 1991) PARCEL ID TAXPAYER STREET NUMBER STREET RESIDENTIAL UNITS COMMERCIAL FRONT FOOTAGE STORM ASSESSMENT' STREET ASSESSMENT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 102922430029 CHARLES G HOPKINS ETAL 1633 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430030 LEAH KUSTER MCCLARNON 1639 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430034 TONG N YANG 1640 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430031 NOAH A KORBA 1649 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430032 CATHERINE J WALKER 1655 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430033 JOSE REYES 1656 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440074 WILLIAM GLAMPE 1665 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440086 CARL E BERGLUND 1666 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440075 ARTHUR RINEHART JR 1675 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440085 JAMES M RASSETT 1676 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440076 VIOLET J AMIOT 1689 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440084 LOIS BERNICE JOHNSON TRUSTEE 1692 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440077 DICK M CALLEN 1695 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440083 YOU HER 1698 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440082 TERENCE J NADLER 1706 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440078 MORTGAGE ELEC REG SYSTEMS INC 1709 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440081 STEVEN A FREEMAN 1714 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440080 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD SANDHURST AVE E 102922440079 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD SANDHURST AVE E 102922440035 ANTHONY N PIKE 1725 SANDHURST AVE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440036 JOHN R LAWRENCE 2205 PROSPERITY ROAD N 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922440087 MARLYCE M JOHNSON 1665 COUNTY ROAD B E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 102922430023 JAMES A KRESSIN 2209 KENNARD STREET N 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922120013 OPERATIONS ISO 622 1560 COUNTY ROAD B E 309 N/A S30,652.80 $30.652.80 152922120006 JACQUELINE MARY FRANK 1646 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922120003 KIMBERLY M DIEDRICH 1647 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922120004 KATHERINE A OGRADY 1655 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922120007 WILLIAM A OSWALD 1654 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110032 JOHN P MCGARRIGLE 1659 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110042 ALFRED 0 CLEMEN JR 1662 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110031 D FRANKLIN TOLBERT 1669 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110030 GREGORY A KOLBECK 1675 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110038 GERALD J SOLNITZKY 2121 PROSPERITY ROAD N 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110022 MARK E GOPHER 1708 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110021 GRACE E LOCKE 1714 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110008 CAROLE E LYNNE 1723 BURKE AVENUE E 1 $820.00 $4,960.00 $5,780.00 152922110020 XIONG S VANG 1724 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110009 JOSHUA S MOGREN 1731 BURKE AVENUE E 1 $820.00 $4,960.00 $5,780.00 152922110019 ERIC A BOYD 1732 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110010 JOHN A PECHMANN 1737 BURKE AVENUE E 1 $820.00 $4,960.00 $5,780.00 152922110018 ROBERT F KUSTERMAN 1742 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110011 STUART D OLSON 1747 BURKE AVENUE E 1 $820.00 $4,960.00 $5,780.00 152922110017 W F FRANTZ 1750 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110012 EDWARD C FLAHERTY 1755 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110016 GREGORY C MOSER JR 1760 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110046 TIMOTHY A HOAAS 1765 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110014 THOMAS M ZANGS 1771 BURKE AVENUE E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 152922110015 SHIRLEY N TREBESH 2125 WHITE BEAR AVE N 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 112922330001 JOSEPH L FLEMING 2271 WHITE BEAR AVE N 81 N/A $8,035.20 $8,035.20 102922430044 CLAY A LANGER 1655 COUNTY ROAD B E 1 N/A $4,960.00 $4,960.00 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL STORM UNITS FRONT FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT TOTALS= 109 1623 $3,280.00 STREET ASSESSMENT TOTAL ASSESSMENT $694,132.00 $697,412.00 TOTAL = $697,412.00 2 at 2 I ILJI cERVAis viEw AVE. CT. AVE, Knuckle Hecd Ecke C AVE, -) < ry D. o Q cn Un UA W _I � Sherwood --- i W RST o < W � _ co. RD. > B E. BURK AVE. Cn As Community /E. 6 � 65 Center John Glenn 0 GATEWAY City Hall 0 w HARRIS AVE. Q ROSEWOOD AVE. N. z ROSEWOOD AV, AVE. S RAMSEY C 1 F1 r�y I ��. �P NUR AIR GR NO SCALE Lark — Prosperity, 07-15 Maplewood, Minnesota Proposed 2007 Construction Property identification number: j (a - 2- -4 - LJ - � 1 2 d igit n u m – e r) Do you wish to address the City Council tonight? F Yes YO Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request th9t the city council consider (check one): Okc, Q 4 1 IMVP - f z , a�,,& kk a. Deferral of assessment ce-filct" CL OVIZ b. wenior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C. i5 Cancellation of assessment d. F Revision of assessment Reason for the request: doh LJO I IAAQ �, �—' 9CIIVZI AND WDe--6,TOW cl� LC 8 L� 4/ F QN IA i� A 0, 1 H' C re-Q Q C ORI Df -! Address of Property OZ Zip Telephone t ... L!'J.l./- !�/*J✓ yf'j�.t NjS,l '/-l�- '�'- t�.��{ .�./I l.� %..1� .._ {.... f tL" -., g �}��i.....J� ..(...'�../ _� {1 ._VOI�� � 1/ � , �� . �._/ f i 1 I r L E F twe . ;�' e � 1 1 � e f a / { 4 u l ato M A Lo IAI � a 9AA CAA A_a- - 6bM tzcr ---------- 2 -0 _Aaa _Q_ , �OCAUI lqi;,a m r.! I ASSESS-MENT HEARING OBJECTION FORM STREET 1IMPROVEmiENTS PROJECT 07-0 Address of assessed parcel l So L /l, h livf— Property identification number: (12 digit number} D r- Cho you wish to address the city council tonight? I F Yes No Please complete this form if You intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. F Deferral of assessment i b. j I X Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C. F Cancellation of assessment d. F Revision of assessment Reason for the request: 1 - XV , <,-, ' j 0 V Print Name Signature Date �o L 14 1 a E /I x, kf , /)-) /-� 1 --I ( -5 1 ) am 3 Address of Property Owner dip Telephone Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No El Deferral of assess_ eat Is Address of Property Owner AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles /\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer Jon jG[0Sch.Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements, Project 07-14 1' Approve Resolution for Adoption of Assessment Roll DATE: September 10 INTRODUCTION On August 27th, 2007, the city council received ten (10) assessment objections at the Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements assessment hearing. Recommendations for action on each of the objections are provided for the council to revise Or confirm the final assessment roll for the project. Background The proposed assessments for the Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements were submitted to the city council for adoption at the August 27th,2007meeting. Residents were provided with the required 14- day advanced notice of the city's intent to levy the assessments, and the residents were required to file a written notice if they objected t0 the assessment amount. Ten (10) property owners provided written objection as follows: o. Parcel 25202213O085— Richard and Virginia VVSinho|d;2815 Stillwater Road Mr. and Mrs. Weinhold object to the assessment based upon a senior citizen financial hardship. b. Parcel 25202212001M— John NiCho|8uS and Keith Johnson; 1148EvarStreet K8c NickO|GUs@nd K8c Johnson object b3 the assessment based Up0D finoDCio| hardship. n. Parcel 252S2212003Y— Laura Linrnth;253O Rose Avenue Laura Linroth objects to the assessment based upon paying too much for taxes. d. Parcel 25202212O028— Margaret Ferguson; 2512 Rose Avenue Margaret Ferguson objects tO the assessment based upon the proposed assessment cost for town h0nnH. e. Parcel 252822120O24— Nancy LWhite; 2532 Rose Avenue Nancy White objects tO the assessment based upon a financial hardship. [ Parcel 25202211O018— Sharon Hansen and Edward Rang; 2057 Geranium Avenue Ms. Hansen and Mr. Rang object to the assessment based upon VnbVi|dGb|elots. g. Parcel 25292211UO2Q— Mary Jane and Larry Schuler; 2048 Geranium Avenue Mr. and Mrs. Schuler object to the assessment based upon anVnbVi|daU|8lot. h. Parcel 252S2211003O— Mary Jane and Larry Schuler; 2848 Geranium Avenue Mr. and Mrs. Schuler object io the assessment based upon not wanting to connect toCity water at this time. Parcel 252922110035—Robert Doane; 2G37 Stillwater Road Mr. Doane objects b] the assessment based upon a financial hardship. i P8[C8| 252022110031 — Nelson J. G8rb9D, Jr.; 2638 G9r@DiUnl /\v8OUS Mr. Gerb8nobjects to the assessment based upon not wanting to connect to City water 8L this time. All property owners requesting hardship or senior citizen deferments have been mailed an application Recommended Adjustments The following action is recommended on each objection request: a' Parcel 252922130065—Richard and Virginia WeimhoUd; 2615 Stillwater Road Mr. and Mrs. Weinhold object to the assessment based upon a senior citizen financial hardship. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen deferral upon approval of necessary paperwork. b. Parcel 25292212g01@— John NickmUmmsand Keith Johnson; 1140EvmrStreet K8c NickO@Ua and K8c JOhOSOD Obi8Ct to the GSS8SsmSOt based UpOD finoDd8| hardship. Staff recommendation ist0 grant 8 financial hardship deferral upon approval ofnecessary c' Parcel 25292212g037— Laura Linroth 253g Rose Avenue L8Vr8Unn]th objects k} the assessment based upon paying too much for taxes. Staff recommendation is to deny the cancellation of assessment as benefit is received. To calculate the assessment rate for each unit, the front-footage for each foUr-p|8x town home was divided bv four and multiplied by the multi-family assessment rate. This a||Ovved the assessment tObe equally distributed k} each unit. Partial reconstruction rates were used, aS there is existing curb and gutter. d' Parcel 252932120028— Margaret Ferguson; 2512 Rose Avenue Margaret Ferguson objects to the assessment based Upon living in 8 town h0nnH. Staff recommendation is to deny the revision of assessment, as benefit is received. To calculate the assessment rate for each unit, the front-footage for each foupp|ex town home was divided bv four and nnV|Lip|i8d by the multi-family assessment rate. This 8||Ovved the assessment tObm equally distributed h3 each unit. Partial reconstruction rates were used, 8S there is existing curb and gutter. e' Parcel 252922120024—Nancy L. White; 2532 Rose Avenue Nancy White objects tV the assessment based upon a financial hardship. Staff recommendation iGtVgrant a financial hardship deferral upon approval Vfnecessary paperwork. f. Parcel 252922110018— Sharon Hansen and Edward Rang; 265T Geranium Avenue Ms. Hansen and Mr. Rang object to the assessment based upon UnbUi|dabhalots. Staff recommendation is to grant a deferral of second and third unit assessments, without interest, until such time pn3pRdv is developed. If the property is not developed within 15 years from the date Of the assessment hearing, the deferred assessment shall b9cancelled. It is also recommended L0grant the cancellation of the three w8temain8GsesSm8nts. VVat8rnl3in and services will be paid for otthe time that they connect hDthe city water. By Qh/ Ordinance, the Vvvn9nS shall be required to connect to City water when their current well g' Parcel 25292211Q029—Mary Jane and Larry Schuler; 2648 Geranium Avenue Mr. and Mrs. Schuler object k) the assessment based upon 8nUnbUi|d8b|elot. Staff recommendation is to grant a deferral of the unit assessment, without interest, until such time property is developed. If the property is not developed within 15 years from the date of the assessment hearing, the deferred assessment shall b8 cancelled. |tisalso recommended bo grant the cancellation 0f the vv@ternoGinassessment. VVGt8[nl8iD8Dd services will be paid for 8L the time that they connect t0 the city water. h' Parcel 25292211g030—Mary Jane and Larry Schuler; 204B Geranium Avenue Mr. and Mrs. Schuler object to the assessment based upon not wanting to connect to City water at this time. Staff recommendation is to grant the cancellation of the watermain assessment. The vv@tRn08in and services shall b9 paid for 8t the time that they connect tO City water. By C|h/ Ordinance, the owners shall be required LV connect to City water when their current well fails. i' Parcel 25292211g035— Robert Doane; 2637 Stillwater Road K8c Doane objects tO the assessment based upon 8fin@DCkal hardship. Staff recommendation iSk} grant 8 financial hardship deferral upon approval Vfnecessary i Parcel 25292211g031— Nelson J'Gmrbem,Jr.:263B Geranium Avenue Mr. G8d]8n objects tVthe assessment based upon not wanting L0 connect tO City water at this time. Staff recommendation is to grant the cancellation of the watermain assessment. The watermain and services shall be paid for at the time that they connect to City water. By City Ordinance, the Ovvnena shall be required to connect to City water when their current well The total assessment amount will bereduced by $24.600 for the cancellation of the six water assessments from $536,276.00 to $511,676.00. Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached Resolution for the Adoption nf the Assessment Roll for the Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements, Project 07-14. Auoo»monm: 1. Resolution: Adoption or the Assessment Roll 2. Assessment Roll n. Location Map 4. Assessment objections (10) RESOLUTION ADJUSTMENTS TO ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to8resolution adopted by the City Council OD August 2 8sS8Gsnn8rt nd| for the F8rnd8|8'G8r8n|Vrn Area Street |nnpn}v8nl8ntS, City Pnz�yt 07-14, was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, ten (1U) property owners filed objections to their assessments according k}the n8qVin]nn9ntS of K8inn8GOt8 Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as hJ||Vvvs: o. Parcel 252922l3O0h5— Richard and Virginia YYciubold; 2615 Stillwater Road Mr. and Mrs. Weinhold object \p the assessment based upon o senior citizen financial hardship. h. Parcel 252922l2UOl6— John NUckmkaom and Keith Johnson; ll46EvurStreet Mr. Nickolaus and Mr. Johnson object to the assessment based upon financial hardship. c. Parcel 252922]2O037— Laura Lbnroth;253U Rose Avenue Laura Liorudh objects tu the assessment based upon paying too much for taxes. d. Parcel 252922l2UO28— Margaret Ferguson; 25l2 Rose Avenue Margaret Ferguson objects to the assessment based upon the proposed assessment for a town home. c. Parcel 252922l2O024— Nancy L. White; 2532 Rose Avenue Nancy White objects to the assessment based upon o financial hardship. [ Parcel 252922110018 — Sharon Hansen and Edward Rang; 2657 Geranium Avenue Ms. Hansen and Mr. Rang object to the assessment based upon unbuildable lots. � Parcel 252922]lO029— Mary Jane and Larry Schuler; 2648 Geranium Avenue Mr. and Mrs. Schuler object tu the assessment based upon uouobui|dublelot. b. Parcel 252922llUO30— Mary Jane and Larry Schuler; 2648 Geranium Avenue Mr. and Mrs. Schuler object to the assessment based upon not wanting to connect to City water utthis donc i. Parcel 252922ilO035— Robert Doane; 2637 Stillwater Road Mr. Doane objects to the assessment based upon u financial hardship. j. Parcel 252922|1O031— Nelson ].(3crhcu,Jr.; 20]8 Geranium Avenue Mr. Gerben objects to the assessment based upon not wanting to connect to City water a¢ this time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEVVOC)D. MINNESOTA: A. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to make the follow ad to the assessment roll for the Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvement, Project 07-14: a. Parcel 252922130065 — Richard and Virginia Weinhold; 2615 Stillwater Road Mr. and Mrs. Weinhold object to the assessment based upon a senior citizen financial hardship. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen deferral upon approval of necessary paperwork. b. Parcel 252922120016— John Nickolaus and Keith Johnson; 1146 Evar Street Mr. Nickolaus and Mr. Johnson object to the assessment based upon financial hardship. Staff recommendation is to grant a financial hardship deferral upon approval of necessary paperwork. c. Parcel 252922120037 — Laura Linroth; 2530 Rose Avenue Laura Linroth objects to the assessment based upon paying too much for taxes. Staff recommendation is to deny the cancellation of assessment as benefit is received. To calculate the assessment rate for each unit, the front - footage for each four -plex town home was divided by four and multiplied by the multi - family assessment rate. This allowed the assessment to be equally distributed to each unit. Partial reconstruction rates were used, as there is existing curb and gutter. d. Parcel 252922120028 — Margaret Ferguson; 2512 Rose Avenue Margaret Ferguson objects to the assessment based upon living in a town home. Staff recommendation is to deny the revision of assessment, as benefit is received. To calculate the assessment rate for each unit, the front- footage for each four -plex town home was divided by four and multiplied by the multi- family assessment rate. This allowed the assessment to be equally distributed to each unit. Partial reconstruction rates were used, as there is existing curb and gutter. e. Parcel 252922120024 — Nancy L. White; 2532 Rose Avenue Nancy White objects to the assessment based upon a financial hardship. Staff recommendation is to grant a financial hardship deferral upon approval of necessary paperwork. f. Parcel 252922110018 — Sharon Hansen and Edward Rang 2657 Geranium Avenue Ms. Hansen and Mr. Rang object to the assessment based upon unbuildable lots. Staff recommendation is to grant a deferral of second and third unit assessments, without interest, until such time property is developed. If the property is not developed within 15 years from the date of the assessment hearing, the deferred assessment shall be cancelled. It is also recommended to grant the cancellation of the three watermain assessments. Watermain and services will be paid for at the time that they connect to the city water. By City Ordinance, the owners shall be required to connect to City water when their current well fails. g. Parcel 252922110029 — Mary Jane and Larry Schuler; 2648 Geranium Avenue Mr. and Mrs. Schuler object to the assessment based upon an unbuildable lot. Staff recommendation is to grant a deferral of the unit assessment, without interest, until such time property is developed. If the property is not developed within 15 years from the date of the assessment hearing, the deferred assessment shall be cancelled. It is also recommended to grant the cancellation of the watermain assessment. Watermain and services will be paid for at the time that they connect to the city water. h. Parcel 252922110030 — Mary Jane and Larry Schuler; 2648 Geranium Avenue Mr. and Mrs. Schuler object to the assessment based upon not wanting to connect to City water at this time. Staff recommendation is to grant the cancellation of the Watermain assessment. The watermain and services shall be paid for at the time that they connect to City water. By City Ordinance, the owners shall be required to connect to City water when their current well fails. i. Parcel 252922110035 — Robert Doane; 2637 Stillwater Road Mr. Doane objects to the assessment based upon a financial hardship. Staff recommendation is to grant a financial hardship deferral upon approval of necessary paperwork. j. Parcel 252922110031 — Nelson J. Gerben, Jr.; 2638 Geranium Avenue Mr. Gerben objects to the assessment based upon not wanting to connect to City water at this time. Staff recommendation is to grant the cancellation of the watermain assessment. The watermain and services shall be paid for at the time that they connect to City water. By City Ordinance, the owners shall be required to connect to City water when their current well fails. B. The assessment roll for the Ferndale- Geranium Area Street Improvements, as amended, is hereby accepted, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Said assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. C. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2008 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.0 percent per annum for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2007. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. D. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, but no later than October 1, 2007, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the office of the city engineer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time after October 1, 2007, pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. E. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after October 1, 2007, but no later than November 15 2007, transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the council on this 1 0 th day of September 2007 FERNDALE - GERANIUM AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT INFORMATION CITY PROJECT 07 -14 PARCEL ID TAXPAYER STREET NUMBER STREET RESIDENTIAL UNITS COMMERCIAL FRONT FOOTAGE MULTI - FAMILY FRONT FOOTAGE STORM ASSESSMENT' WATERMAIN ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 252922110052 2728 GERANIUM 0 CENTURY AVE N 350 $5,740.00 $34,720.00 $40,460.00 252922120016 JOHN D NICKOLAUS 1146 EVAR ST 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120015 TAMARA J WESTPHALL 1142 EVAR ST N 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120046 GARY E ERICKSON 1144 EVAR ST N 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120071 SAMUEL A RIVARD 1147 EVAR ST N 28 NiA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120045 DOLORES C MCCORMICK TRUSTEE 1148 EVAR ST N 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120070 DOLORES L REESE 1149 EVAR ST N 23 NIA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120017 TERRI J DAVIS 1152 EVAR ST N 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120044 SUZANNE H ODONNELL 1154 EVAR ST N 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120018 ROY E GINN 1156 EVAR ST N 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120043 MARIANNE DAVIDSON 1158 EVAR ST N 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120019 ESTER KATHLEEN QUINLEY 1162 EVAR ST N 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120042 JMW INVESTMENTS LLC 1164 EVAR ST N 30 NiA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120020 FRED M GORKA 1166 EVAR ST N 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120041 NADIA KAMARA LEWIS 1168 EVAR ST N 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120086 THOMAS M WIND 1127 FERNDALE AVE 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120001 JEFF J MCCLURE 0 FERNDALE ST N NIA $0.00 252922130066 ANDREW J BLOOMQUIST 0 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120118 JAMES F WEINGARTZ 1091 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700 -00 $3,700.00 252922120117 ROBERT E WARN 1101 FERNDALE ST N 1 NiA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922110061 JOHN C CAPISTRANT 1106 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120116 THOMAS G MUELLNER SR 1111 FERNDALE ST N 50 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922110054 TRACY K ROY 1112 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120115 THOMAS G MUELLNER SR 1113 FERNDALE ST N 50 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922110033 MIKE SELLERS 1122 FERNDALE ST N 2 NIA $9460.00 $7,400.00 $16,860.00 252922110032 KENNETH H DUROSE 1124 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700 -00 $3,700.00 252922120176 BRUCE D JOHNSON 1133 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120175 BRANDON L GARZA 1139 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252 92212 01 74 JOSEPH A HAINES 1145 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120173 DAVID C BAHL 1151 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922110014 BRION A BOHN 1156 FERNDALE ST N 1 NiA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120172 ROBERT P DAAS 1157 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120171 EILEEN M ANZALDI 1165 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922110013 RONALD BRYAN SUITER 1168 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922110012 GABRIEL PEREZ RESENDEZ 1180 FERNDALE ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922110011 THOMAS CHUE TONG LOR 1184 FERNDALE ST N 1 NiA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922110031 NELSON J GEBBEN 2638 GERANIUM AVE 1 NIA $4,960.00 $4,960.00 252922110029 LAWRENCE R SCHULER 2648 GERANIUM AVE 1 NIA $4,960.00 $4,960.00 252922110030 LAWRENCE R SCHULER 2648 GERANIUM AVE 1 NIA $4,960.00 $4,960.00 252922120159 JOSHUA S RINKE 2504 GERANIUM AVE E 37 NIA $2,738.00 $2,738.00 252922120064 ROBERT O WELTY 2505 GERANIUM AVE E 28 NIA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120158 ANN M BOETTCHER 2506 GERANIUM AVE E 37 NIA $2,738.00 $2,738.00 252922120077 NANCY C KELLER 2507 GERANIUM AVE E 28 NIA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120157 LEON F AXTMAN 2510 GERANIUM AVE E 31 NiA $2,294.00 $2,294.00 252922120065 RICK T ANDERSON 2511 GERANIUM AVE E 28 NIA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120156 EMILY ANNE LARSEN 2512 GERANIUM AVE E 31 NIA $2,294.00 $2,294.00 252922120076 GEORGIANNA E KEMPER 2513 GERANIUM AVE E 28 NIA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120154 GREGORY HOCKING 2514 GERANIUM AVE E 31 NIA $2,294.00 $2,294.00 252922120066 CECILE I MALACK 2515 GERANIUM AVE E 28 NIA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120155 TERRENCE ROBINSON 2516 GERANIUM AVE E 31 NIA $2,294.00 $2,294.00 252922120075 COLLEEN M WHELAN 2517 GERANIUM AVE E 28 NIA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120074 LOIS J LAITINEN 2521 GERANIUM AVE E 28 NiA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120067 COLLEEN M CONNOLLY 2523 GERANIUM AVE E 28 NIA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120073 RODRIGUEZ INVESTMENT PROP LLC 2525 GERANIUM AVE E 28 NIA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120068 EDWARD M WEGWERTH 2527 GERANIUM AVE E 28 NIA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120072 VICKY L SARNER 2531 GERANIUM AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120069 DIANE L MILLER 2533 GERANIUM AVE E 28 NIA $2,072.00 $2,072.00 252922120188 JEFFREY E VINER 2563 GERANIUM AVE E 2 NIA $7,400.00 $7,400.00 252922120185 ALICE M SCHROEDER LE 2583 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120186 CAROL J MILLAR 2591 GERANIUM AVE E 50 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120187 SALLY J EVANS 2593 GERANIUM AVE E 50 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120088 THOMAS G MUELLNER SR 2597 GERANIUM AVE E 50 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120087 THOMAS G MUELLNER SR 2599 GERANIUM AVE E 50 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922110015 DANIEL K HAAKINSON 2627 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NiA $4,960.00 $4,960.00 252922110016 THEODORE V CARLSON 2637 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NIA $4.100.00 $4,960.00 $9,060.00 252922110017 MARILYN DEMOULLY 2645 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NIA $4.100.00 $4,960.00 $9,060.00 252922110018 EDWARD R RANG 2657 GERANIUM AVE E 3 NIA $14,880.00 $14,880.00 252922110028 TIMOTHY I FLEISCHHACKER 2666 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NIA $4.100.00 $4,960.00 $9,060.00 252922110027 JOSEPH MISKE 2674 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NIA $4,100.00 $4,960.00 $9,060.00 252922110026 ROGER R GUND III 2682 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NIA $4.100.00 $4,960.00 $9,060.00 252922110019 DENNIS W KERSKA 2663 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NIA $4.100.00 $4,960.00 $9,060.00 252922110020 DAVID A DRUMMOND 2691 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NiA $4,100.00 $4,960.00 $9,060.00 252922110025 SCOTT D ANDERSON 2692 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NIA $4.100.00 $4,960.00 $9,060.00 252922110024 ALLAN SKY HUELSMAN 2700 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NIA $4.100.00 $4,960.00 $9,060.00 252922110021 CURRENT RESIDENT 2701 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NIA $4.100.00 $4,960.00 $9,060.00 252922110060 STEVEN R WENSMAN 2707 GERANIUM AVE E 1 NIA $4.100.00 $4,960.00 $9,060.00 252922120003 KATHLEEN M FLANAGAN 1189 GLENDON ST 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120002 JEFFREY MCCLURE 1197 GLENDON ST 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120184 SALVADOR J FERROZZO 1124 GLENDON ST N 50 NiA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120183 LINDA S FREY 1126 GLENDON ST N 50 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 1 of 2 FERNDALE - GERANIUM AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT INFORMATION CITY PROJECT 07 -14 PARCEL ID TAXPAYER STREET NUMBER STREET RESIDENTIAL UNITS COMMERCIAL FRONT FOOTAGE MULTI - FAMILY FRONT FOOTAGE STORM ASSESSMENT' WATERMAIN ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 252922120182 TIMOTHY P KENNEDY 1134 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120012 ROXANNE MAGEE 1135 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120181 RICHARD K GILBERT 1140 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120011 BILL ACRES 1145 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700 -00 $3,700.00 252922120180 MARTIN N CARLSON 1146 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120179 JAMES J VERNSTROM 1150 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120010 TERRANCE M STREHLO 1153 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120178 JEFFREY T BOSTON 1158 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120009 MICHAEL J NOVAK 1159 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700 -00 $3,700.00 252922120177 GARY G SJERVEN 1166 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120006 PAUL B GEORGE 1167 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120005 BRUCE A SCHLEICHER 1175 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120004 DOREEN E WILLIAMS 1163 GLENDON ST N 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922120032 MARGARET H GOODSON 2504 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120061 BETTY J BEANE 2505 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120029 THOMAS G CASPERSON 2506 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120048 COLLEEN A NAUGHTON 2507 ROSE AVE E 30 NiA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120033 BARBARA J RAAEN 2510 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120049 ROBERTA K GOESS 2511 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120028 MARGARET E FERGUSON 2512 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120060 ALMA E JARVINEN 2513 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120034 DONALD M MCNEA 2514 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120050 GERRI A CLARKIN L E 2515 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120027 MARK J SCHREIER 2516 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120059 ANNE M BRUCKER 2517 ROSE AVE E 30 NiA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120035 THERESA BEHNKE 2520 ROSE AVEE 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120051 RUTH A STAUS 2521 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120026 LOIS L LYNCH 2522 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120058 SEAN M MCCARTY 2523 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120036 KENYON S LATHAM JR 2524 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120052 MICHAEL LOUIS MILLER SR 2525 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120025 ALEMAYEHU WAYESSA 2526 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120057 RICHARD L GILL 2527 ROSE AVE E 30 NiA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120037 LAURA L LINROTH 2530 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120053 DENNIS K SCHACHT 2531 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120024 NANCY L WHITE 2532 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120056 LON M PETERS 2533 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120038 MYRON H LARSON 2534 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120054 CRISTI J TORGERSEN 2535 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120023 SHAJIULLAH KHAN 2536 ROSE AVE E 30 NIA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922120055 PHILLIP T DEMMA 2537 ROSE AVE E 30 NiA $2,220.00 $2,220.00 252922139065 RICHARD E WEINHOLD 2615 STILLWATER RD 1 NIA $3,700.00 $3,700.00 252922140001 DAVID Y CHANG 2627 STILLWATER RD E 218 NIA $16,132.00 $16,132.00 252922110035 ROBERT E DOANE 2637 STILLWATER RD E 114 NIA $8,436.00 $8,436.00 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL STORM WATERMAIN UNITS FRONT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FOOTAGE TOTALS= 56 682.00 $5,740.00 $45,100.00 2007 ASSESSMENT RATES, STREET ASSESSMENT TOTAL ASSESSMENT $451,376.00 $511,676.00 TOTAL = $511,676.00 RESIDENTIAL STORM SEWER = $820.00 /UNIT RESIDENTIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $4,960.00 /UNIT RESIDENTIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $3,700.001UNIT COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER = $16.401FRONT FOOT COMMERCIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $99.20IFRONT FOOT COMMERCIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $74A01FRONT FOOT NOTES: ' PROPERTIES LABELED - NiA" WERE PREVIOUSLY ASSESSED FOR STORM SEWER UNDER CITY PROJECT 73 -14 OR 78 -20 OR BOTH. 'ASSESSMENT INCLUDES THE FEES FOR EXTENDING SAN. AND WATER SERVICES TO THIS PROPERTY FOR A LOT SPLIT. 2 oft EAT LN SIN DR J 4"5 AVE. 1 ANTELOPE WAY 2 AMBERJACK LN 3 BEAVERDALE RD 4 BOBCAT LN 5 COUGAR LN AVE. oil 901"1 NIVA JNOLIA Geranium Park z A D U� U� U Lij 0 cn - i - a < 1-- z �O ------------------ = ' NO SCALE Ferndale—Gercnium, 07-1 Maplewood, Minnesota Proposed 2007 Construction D G �P�j U � D U� HAWTHORNE AVE. D G �P�j Property identification number: AUG 0 2007 ewood (12 digit number) 'PT'nabuc- Wort Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ❑ ❑ Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. ❑ Deferral of assessment b. 100 Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C. F Cancellation of assessment !X)PPCxAe-a A�\�s C-OMM�-Xv\k4�4 4 SOLAr5 Address of Property Owner + % � V',&3 ke LA- ( 10 ) Zip Telephone - NME F 4 0 1 4 # Maplewoo 9 August 13, 2007 Department of Public Works City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood MN, 55109 ATTN: City Clerk Dear Sir or Madame, This letter is in response to the Statement of Assessment we received on August 11, 2007. The Assessment is concerning City Project # 07 -14: Ferndale - Geranium Area Street Improvements. We are objecting to this assessment on three points: The first being that we already pay a significant amount of property tax to the City of Maplewood. This project should have already been part of our current property tax and we simply don't feel it is necessary to charge the residents of this area an additional fee to improve what the City of Maplewood should already be maintaining for us. l'G 2 0 2007 v 'e �6ac Wort Second, we currently have our townhouse up for sale and will not be living at this location for much longer. We feel it is not in our best interest to pay this additional $2,220.00 because it does not benefit in the long run in any way. Plus, having an assessment on the property will certainly make selling the townhouse more difficult in an already poor market. I'm sure the other homeowners with property for sale feel the same way. And third, like many of the residents in this area, we do not have an extra $2,220.00 available to pay the City of Maplewood additional money to fix the roads who's upkeep they are responsible for. We simply can not afford this assessment. ith Johnson -RE MITTIMITM-9 2L (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ❑ Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. ❑ Deferral of assessment b. F Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C. x Cancellation of assessment d. ❑ Revision of assessment Reason for the request: I C - 1 I it Address of Property 6wner Zip Telephone f fl Y U-1 L Print Name Signature Date w � �� � �� >� � . !a °.��. 2 �: �w��� ddb �/ � \ 2)� �d \�� /��� ���:���; � w��+ % . . , IMIROEMENTS ROB TC Address of assessed parcel -. " •- , ,f (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ❑ ❑ Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. ❑ Deferral of assessment b. ❑ Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C. ❑ Cancellation of assessment d. a Revision of assessment Reason for the request: r Address of Property Owner Zip Telephone ASSESSMENT HEARING OBJECTION FORM 'T IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Ll Address of assessed parcel 4, :L1 (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ❑ Yes ZN Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. R Deferral of assessment b. ❑ Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. ❑ Cancellation of assessment d. ❑ Revision of assessment Reason for the request: 0 -5 - 7 Is 0- Address of Property Owner Zip Telephone �7 Print Name 'tignatufe Date 0 ASSESSMENT HEARING OBJECTION FORM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT , -_® E wa Address of assessed parcel IIUT-•- Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise irr cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. F1 Deferral of assessment Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C. El Cancellation of assessment • Revision of assessment Reason for the request: Print Name Signature Date 71.5­ 72 Address of Property Owner Zip Telephone i (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Y6 El " Y No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise *. cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonighfs city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): El Deferral of assessmen! b. El Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C. d Cancellation of assessment Revision of assessment Reason for the request: o" 10 *3 U I Pvt`gw t n Z t --�P'o W> C3 C7 a F Nmn Z;-a —, I �^" Z=' 8H to °° Q 0 � txl I H7, tl o E ro4- }tj� £p p n ba to F -9 1 CA t�: x w n H I a " 3 t 01 Q c: w J3 o o tE Gd CA0CC0 50 ra pomp Ell :9 N t .. r k o H a*s to z.. M L13 Id ----, ' PU Y3 0 0 to CJ 0 1°3 o to t o -j to o to W ci f6 L�3 z d y ✓ A €t t 4>' N o ` XW -- to 0 oz0 NJ N y Y k3 CA H Z H 0 (:3 Is 0 r`z F C ol I r K9 0 H Is id tl Q l.} lal w " H #� I C C 0 C C A o E� � 1 fl cy tP 'X Ka ; 1 -3 19 t* w4 Q { t O n °n a Co z \ a M H C4Z0 U L3a O �� U(n I so eGV M � l,.�` a M CI} 0 !d. WW M H39 Cx1 06 C to p Z N:P r 'O C 'Ti t 1 - 3 n H n £A H } o :�gC xt'atz 0 p N I to H Irx H u 1.30 Cn CCt0 C e_ N H m m M to Q eacv?ny� } 4> Z ow m rer k +-3 N m Ft •.5 O 0 a t ro z C k to n CA r;} I O Ctl o� H to n t F to CA O n G o 1-t o ts 0 ol �tl ° a. 1 , 3 w k N z t a" ° 0 ha 4 1 0 0 1 N H ca1'3W 00gIk +-31-3 1 o C o E7 L-] i tai 1x7 t%3 w t1 m :vl k w 0 CA Cl3 0 t° yz k .. .. .. .. n n k i7 tj n 1 p ® \ii H ! tr UN A 4 1 .x cl °V H C i 4 \ M W C4 t O G3 to m sa \ / i o � 1 '1 C=3 5x M z 0 k r4 C oonn z c 1 Cl C caotop o 0 e pto MM O E'3 G3 ' t� C � '. C9 to N Fd ppirys 1 Fi Z C{} (] H 14 � Al H 01 t1 to tsi Y Mt3 ws 4 H F«�v o i 47 e'Ta no 'Z o xt n 1 n of z 4 a3 C t� 3 n j ?Cj N hi t5 Z i to t - a H CA A Ln ,n o z, cCS L`J I w N a (S c'3 a t Z C3 q Co Pv ).{ • CdC '�'`�. H Vi 1 e� n °r"v py yy M 7o o F H M o+3 I In Z oo ms (140 C 1 n ne�to�y t[�zzo x to to z ��-a � H sl°s �zt?+1 W to N ° �oq k -i WP1 CA I k OW o >W00o 0 Hlt,, W 1 0 o N 5�{�H F -0C,n �Sr`�'1 tk7 Cs9 HDm �k .aa� � i-t C7 o-�` H{73 rs '� 1 '3 1 [d3 d V n U Q O 3 w v . i 1 C Oa ° t IS kT7 ?'3 }'3 C!3 U3 C%1 ` i-°k t°� n '�1 Ua 1 6b Cfa ? o b U3 H 14 1 k F 0 t4 1 r3 1 11 ;KW tl H m1x3o0H > FiQt+S[fik- t €- 3Cs-3LT%^^ -. C. to k WO 1 H 0ZL� C i.°0 M • N 0 "z' Z ?C• t'M €sXtoUsMCM 14 1 C. to k :9 c:0>tran w tj 00 aWvir- to = H 3:gzMN 2%0 : 1 Hl< k u 3 xe'a.`C3 `xi 0 M1 - ` ° > I 0 �'1-3On t< 0`z(H O ,PM k V 1 Z m >< w ° �� m 1 * a°' 0 to to to Q 1 0 q M O to L� M k 0R+ i 0 t Z Z H . • . His Cis MH \'! tel C3o ?"EH H 1 ti. Via'N 0 01-3 to p P w u M 0 raa Z P M€s� 0 C1azt1 to „c aw Ll w z QH k wuW Mmov to to uo-3w°a Am Ct1 t A N CO 0 A U3 0 V h.s � L X vM '0 M to V U3 C 0 n 1 G�'a o� �n n W o 11} >" L-1s p C G" >' H Xk-1 H H 1 >"3 m to o Ci 0 0 '� e I z : >1 4 O { C l c H C t- S 6 w *r3 C k H t R7 :P z CA ry µ^ 1 WD, 1! H 0 f Cf1 S © c7 O H ltl F' 00 0"3 H H to o W' H �e FORM OVEMENTS Address of asses se parce Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise *r cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight!s city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): Reason for the request. l e e li�n e Date L Address of Property Oijper 6 7 Zip Telephone Reason for the request. ASSE HE A R ING .. PR OJECT— :ENT al Address of assessed parcel ' Property identification number: (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? es No r J,A Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. 1 request that the city council consider (check one): a. ❑ Deferral of assessment b. ❑ Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C. ❑ Cancellation of assessment d. Revision of assessment Raacnn fnr the ranuest, Address of Property Owner TT Zip Telephone Print Name - - -u ` Signature Date s 4 „ JU l ly " A�'.1' ?t... t.. dr F y# :� AS ESS EN A�RIN 4jf( '( ��TION FOKA T IMPROVEMENTI H ,+L PROJ�ECT Address of assessed parcel I= 2- (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonights city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. Deferral of assessment L)AiCe, W�l I b. El Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) Cancellation of assessmeni L n Revision • assessment • �46 C, 4 6 f S �(4 11�0- 3 j 0 V 6 4 Ai 6 Agenda Item K4b AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: R. Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Jon Jarosch, Civil Engineer I SUBJECT: Ferndale-Geranium Area Improvements, City Project 07-14, Resolution Approving No Parking on the West Side of Ferndale Street from Stillwater Road to Maryland Avenue. DATE: September 10, 2007 INTRODUCTION The City Council shall consider the approval of parking restrictions on the west side of Ferndale Street from Stillwater Road to Maryland Avenue. These restrictions are necessary to meet state aid standards for Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements. Description Ferndale Street is being fully reconstructed as part of the Ferndale-Geranium Street improvement project. Ferndale Street is proposed to be constructed to a uniform width of 36 feet from face-to-face of curb, matching the existing width. A 36 foot wide street section only accommodates parking on one side of the street and two driving lanes per state aid standards. Due to the design and funding requirements set on state aid projects, "No Parking" restrictions must be set for Ferndale Street by council resolution. All residents who live on Ferndale have been notified of the parking restriction by mail. Staff has not heard any objections from residents opposed to the parking restriction. It is recommended that the council approve the attached resolution adopting No Parking restrictions on the west side of Ferndale Street from Stillwater Road to Maryland Avenue. Attachments: 1. Resolution Approving No Parking Restrictions (Ferndale Street) 2, Project Location Map RESOLUTION FERNDALE STREET — "NO PARKING" RESTRICTIONS WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preparation of plans and specifications for the Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements, City Project OY-14inJVne 2007, and WHEREAS, the city will be expending Municipal State Aid funds on the improvement of Ferndale Street; and WHEREAS, segments Of said improvement dO not conform bJ the approved State Aid standard for unrestricted parking; and WHEREAS, release of MSA funds is dependent on specified parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, |T|8 HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Of Maplewood shall ban the parking of motor vehicles OD the west side Of Ferndale Street from its intersection with Sti||vv8tR[ Road t0 its intersection with Maryland Avenue. Dated 8t Maplewood, Minnesota this 1Uth day of September, 20O7 EAT LN �IN DR J 4"5 AVE. 1 ANTELOPE WAY 2 AMBERJACK LN 3 BEAVERDALE RD 4 BOBCAT LN 5 COUGAR LN AVE. oil 901"1 NIVA JNOLIA Geranium Park z A D U� U� U� Lij 0 cn :i- < 1-- z �O ------------------ = ' NO SCALE Ferndale—Gercnium, 07-1 Maplewood, Minnesota Proposed 2007 Construction G D �P�j U � D U� HAWTHORNE AVE. G D �P�j Agenda Item K5 MEMORANDUM T(]: City Manager FROM: T0[n EkStn3Od, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Consideration of Partnership Change--St' Paul's Monastery Property Development L{){|A7|[)N: 20y5Lorpnntnur Avenue East DATE: September 4.2O87 lFmbrmmn/ChrysmUimMerger At the June 11 council meeting, the city council discussed the pending merger between the Tubnn8n Family Alliance and Chrysalis, another human-service organization. The council questioned whether this merger, which b}Vk place on July 1, vvVV|d result in an intensification of activities on the Monastery site or an increase in the anticipated traffic in the neighborhood beyond that discussed during the PU0 approval process. The council directed staff tO forward this matter to the planning commission for discussion and evaluation and then bring |L before the city council for discussion. The planning commission discussed this matter on August 21,2O07. Past Action OD May 14.2007, the city council approved oPU[) (planned unit development) and @preliminary plat for the St. Paul's Monastery property 812875L8rp8nL8Ur Avenue East. The development, 8S w A 40-unit senior-housing apartment building to be operated by CommonBond Communities. * A 50-unit town house development also to be built and operated by CommonBond. The existing 11 0-car parking lot for the monastery on this site would be removed and relocated south Of the monastery building. A change iD use 0f the existing monastery building. This building would b8 sold k} the TUbnl@O F8nn|k/ Alliance for Use as 8 family-violence shelter/residence. This proposed t8Ci|itv vv0U|d be used for offices, housing, community support, information and training, child care and education. There would be a 108-car parking lot added to the south end of this proposed parcel for the lFubnnon Family Alliance. There would also be833-C8r parking lot provided northeast Of the monastery building. The Tubnnan Family Alliance use Vf this building would include 37 housing units 8Sfollows: six for single women; 18 for mothers with one tV two children; six for mothers with three or more children; four for adult males and three for mothers with teenage boys. * A future monastery on the north end of the property. The existing monastery building was constructed k]house 278 Sisters. Today, the community consists of 5M Sisters, 35 of which n8Sid8 on site. lFhenafOn3 there is no need for such a large building for the Sisters. The PUD conditions are attached for reference. The city council asked the planning commission tn consider the potential for increased impaC on the approved site use O[ traffic because 0f the TUbD18D/ChryS8|iSmerger. Ms. DuSSO'Battached letter explains that there will be no impact to the site or to the area because of the merger. At their meeting on August 21, the planning commission discussed this merger and its potential affect on the approved PU0. After 8 discussion with Ms. Chris Brinkman, the director of administration at the YUbnnan Family Alliance, the planning ConorniasiOn found that there would be no increase in activity or traffic generated by the use. They found the merger LOb88 "non isGUe. K8S. Brinkman explained that after Tubman obtained the Monastery site, their organization was approached by Chrysalis, 8 non-profit organization that provides chemical dependency and [n8ntG| health services. She explained that there is no intention LV use or need LV use this facility for services that they would provide at the priory site. Chrysalis has 8 new building they are using in Minneapolis and they have no need to relocate any of their services to Maplewood. As to why the applicants did not mention the possibility of the merger during the PUO nevi9vv. Ms. Brinkman said that Tubman was asked to sign a confidentiality waiver until the completion of the merger. As such, that is why the proponents did not notify Maplewood of the merger until after the city had approved the PU0. Options to Consider The city approved the PUD in May 2007 based on the use described in the applicant's project pnDp0SG|. The merger of the organizations will not include any intensification of uses beyond the scope of that proposal. The PU[) was for '"a multi-use family-violence shelter with 37 hmws6m&y units, offices and support fa " The conditions of approval did not reference Tubnnonos the approved user since conditional use permits are attached t0ause on8 property, not iospecific individuals, businesses Ororganizations. Possible VpU0nS at this time regarding the PUO are to: 1. Take no action since the St. Paul's Monastery site development with the operation of family- violence shelter by the Tubman Family Alliance would not become a use of greater intensity because of their merger with Chrysalis. This is based Vn the explanation given byMs. Brinkman at the August 21, 2007 planning commission meeting at which she stated that neither they nor Chrysalis have any intention of running any of Chrysalis' activities from the monastery 2. Call 8 new public hearing to consider amending the PUO.The change could include 8condition that the allowed uses of this PUD shall be limited to the intensity of that proposed initially for this project by the Sisters and bylFubno8n Family Alliance. This revision could confirm or reiterate the sL8t9nn9nt given by Ms. Brinkman with the TUbnn8n Family Alliance that their facility will not be used to provide any client services associated with Chrysalis. For the COUnCi|'S iDfV[OQ@tiOO these services include the following which were taken from the Chrysalis web site: Chemical Health Programs, Child Care, Community Education, Divorce Education, Legal Services, Mental Health, Parenting Time, Professional Education, Resources & Referrals, Support Groups, Tan Clinic and the Tubnnan Family Alliance. p:sem13-28\priory tubman chrysalis 807(3) Attachments: 1. May 14.20O7City Council PUDConditions 2. August 21.2OO7 planning commission minutes 3. Letter from Beverly Dusso MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:0Opm.. Monday, May 14.2O07 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. O7'09 2. St. Paul's Monastery Redevelopment (Century and Larpenteur Avenues) Public Comment on this matter was taken at a Special City Council Meeting on May 7, 2007. Public Comment is now closed. Discussion is limited 0n City Council questions for City Staff. a. Application for Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development b. Preliminary Plat for Century Trails Commons Senior Planner Ekstrand presented the report and responded to questions from the council. Ellen Higgins, in charge of development for Common Bond Communities, addressed the council regarding the proposed affordable housing. Mayor Longrie thanked Ms. Higgins for her suggestion that a transportation task force be created to work toward increasing public transportation to this site. Mayor Longrie stated her support for increasing transportation on the site and creating a task force to look at these issues. Councilmember Hjelle moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use permit fo a planned unit development for the Sisters of St. Benedict of St. Paul's Monastery. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 07-05-071 WHEREAS, the Sisters of St. Benedict of St. Paul's Monastery applied for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development to develop their 31.04-acre site with a 50-unit town house development; a 40'unit seniors housing apartment building; toconvert the existing monastery building ooamulti-use family-violence shelter with 37 housing unito, offices and support facilities and to build ofuture monastery building un the north end of their property. WHEREAS, Section 44-1092(3) of the city ordinances requires a conditional use permit for institutions of any educational, philanthropic and charitable nature. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at 2675 Larpenteur Avenue. The legal description is: That part of the South 1 /2of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying east and north of a line described as beginning at a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of Section 13 985 feet west of the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of Section 13; thence 78 degrees 40 minutes to the right proceeding in a north-northwesterly direction for 620 feet to a point of curve; thence to the left on a curve having a radius of 100 feet a distance of 157.08 feet to a point of tangent; thence 90 degrees to the right, at right angles to the tangent to said curve at said point of tangent, a distance of 450 feet; thence 90 degrees to the left a distance of 200 feet; thence 90 degrees to the right a distance of 225 feet, more or less, to the north line of said South }6of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13. Except that part of the Southeast Quarter of said Southeast Quarter of Section 13 which lies northeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 100 feet southwesterly of a I ine described as ffl beginning at a point on the east line of said Section 13, distant 1324.13 feet north of the southeast corner thereof; thence run westerly at an angle of 90 degrees with said east section line for 186.63 feet; thence deflect to the right on a 10 degree curve, delta angle 29 degrees 20 minutes, for 293.33 feet; thence on tangent to said curve for 100 feet and there terminating; together with all that part of the above described tract, adjoining and southerly of the above described strip, which lies easterly of a line run parallel with and distant 60 feet westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the point of intersection of the above described line with the east line of said Section 13; thence run southerly along the east line of said Section 13 for 540 feet and there terminating; also together with a triangular piece adjoining and southerly of the first above described strip and westerly of the last described strip, which lies northeasterly of the following described line: From a point on the last described line, distant 150 feet southerly of its point of beginning, run westerly at right angles to said line for 60 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence run northwesterly to a point on the southerly boundary of the first above described strip, distant 100 feet westerly of its intersection with a line run parallel with and distant 33 westerly of the east line of said Section 13. Which lies easterly, northerly and easterly of a line described as commencing at said southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13; thence westerly, along said south line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13, a distance of 832.02 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence deflecting to the right 78 degrees 40 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 750.06 feet; thence deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 204.00 feet; thence deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 638.98 feet to said north line of the south half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13 and said line there terminating. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On March 20, 2007, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission also considered the reports and recommendation of city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On May 7, 2007, the city council considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4.The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air 9 poUUU0n drainage, water nJn-off. vibr8tVn. Q8n8r8| unsightliness, R|8tLhc8| interference or other nuisances. 5.The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6.The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation 0f and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. B. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. This planned unit development shall follow the concept plans date-stamped January 11,2O07. These plans are considered concept plans because the applicant must submit design plans t0the city for approval for the proposed apartments, town houses, future monastery; shelter and any other future use. Staff may approve minor changes. 2. This planned unit development dn8S not give any approvals for Lot 1, Block 1 since this site has not been proposed for any future development and its future use is unknown. The development of this site vvOU|d require @ revision of this planned unit development and must comply with all city development requirements. 3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. 4. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 5. The property owner shall b8 required hJdedicate right Ofvv8yfor8 roadway to be studied by the City Engineer during the next three to five year period. The final location of the roadway shall be studied by the City Engineer and reported with a recommendation to the city council. The final need for the roadway has not been determined but will likely be necessary if additional development occurs on this property in excess of that currently being proposed or at higher density levels than approved; and also if property sold includes 8 major 8xp8nSiOnOfV888Lhai generate significant additional traffic tobe generated 8tHi||-K8urr8y. 0. The applicant must obtain all nmCmSS@ry and required permits from the K8inD8S0to Department of Transportation, Ramsey County and the Ramsey-Washington K88Ln} Watershed District. 7. The applicant must provide a right-turn lane on Century Avenue into the site, subject to MnDOT's approval. N . 8. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the engineering reports by Erin Labenee and Michael Thompson dated February 22 by R. Charles AN dated April 19, 2007. 9. The applicant shall install sidewalks wherever possible along Larpenteur Avenue. 10. Staff may approve minor changes to the plans. Seconded bvCouncj|nlemberRnsSb8ch A friendly amendment was added to the motion requiring the following conditions be included in the resolution: 11. Establish a neighborhood committee of no less than nine members whose membership composite shall be one representative from Hill-Murray administration 0r trustees, one day care parent from Maple Tree Day Care, one parent whose child attends Hill-Murray, three neighborhood citizens who signed the petition included in the council packet and three neighborhood citizens who are from the yellow cards received by the city. The committee's purpose shall b8[n facilitate communication, develop neighborhood solutions to neighborhood concerns, and provide feedback tV all parties subject tO the planned unit development. The committee shall report periodically tO the council and disband when DO longer needed. 12. Establish a transportation task force Vf neighbors and parties [0 the planned unit development to work on public transportation service and options for the site, to work iD coordination with the neighborhood committee. 13. The proposed project shall be reviewed by the Community Design Review Board and all requirements 0f that board shall b8followed. 14. Include two playground areas within the planned unit development as discussed at the hearing that were t0bR added to the plans. 15. Develop a security plan in partnership with all of the parties subject to the planned unit development and the neighborhood committee. 18. Monastery Way and Bennett Road shall bR public roads and the cost Of city sewer, ah]rnn vv8tR[, public street infrastructure and city water shall be borne by the developer. 17. The applicant shall install sidewalks along applicant's property 0nL@rpeDteU[ Avenue and internal streets. The council voted as follows: | The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on May 14.2OO7. Councilmember Hielle moved approval of a preliminary plat for Century Trails Commons N located at 2675 Larpenteur Avenue. Approval is subiect to: 1. Redesigning the public street right-of-way within the site to be 60 feet wide. 2. Complying with the applicable requirements of the engineering reports by Erin Lob8ree and Michael Thompson dated February 22.2OO7 and bvF<. Charles Ah|dated April 19.20O7. 3. 8tneHL lights shall be installed if required bv the city engineer, subject to his 4. The anoiCard shall dedicate any additional right-of-way if required by R8nlS8y County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 5. The property owner ShoU be required b3 dedicate i for roadway to be studied by the City Engineer during the next three to five year period. The final location [f the roadway shall b8 studied by the City Engineer and reported with G recommendation to the city council. The final need for the roadway has not been determined but will likely be necessary if additional development occurs on this property in excess of that currently being proposed or at higher density levels than approved; and also if property sold includes 8 major 8xp8nSiOnOfVS8Sthat generate significant additional traffic to be generated at ||i||-K8Urnay. Seconded bvCoUn[i|nl8n1b8rRosSb8dl U N . DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, August 21, 2007 a) Planned Unit Development Clarification — Saint Paul's Monastery (2675 Larpenteur Avenue) Mr. Ekstrand stated that the city council approved the PUD for the development plans for the Monastery site on May 14, 2007. This included a 40 unit seniors building, a 50 unit townhouse development, and the change in the Monastery building to be owned and house by the Tubman Family Alliance for their family violence shelter and residence, which has 37 housing units. Since that approval, there was a merger between Tubman and Chrysalis. At the June 11, 2007 city council meeting, the council questioned the impact that this would have on the neighboring area in regards to traffic. The Planning Commission is to discuss this matter and forward their comments to the city council. Chris Brinkman, the director of administration at Tubman Family Alliance, addressed the commission. After Tubman obtained the Monastery site, the organization was approached by Chrysalis, a non-profit which has chemical dependency and mental health services. There is no intention that this facility would be used for the services that they provide. Tubman was asked to sign a confidentiality waiver until the merger was completed. That is why the city of not notified of the merger until after the PUD had been approved. The merger was completed on May 23, 2007. Commissioner Yarwood clarified that the merger with Chrysalis does not have any affect on the activities of this facility. Ms. Brinkman said it does not. This merger would possibly reduce the amount of staff at the Monastery because some administrative support may move to Chrysalis' new building in Minneapolis. Commissioner Yarwood asked if the use of this site were to change in the future, would the city have any say in the terms of that use. Mr. Ekstrand stated that when the PUD was approved, it was approved with the types of uses that would be operated there. It was never specified that the intensity of uses should not exceed a certain threshold. PUDs are reviewed annually to see if there are any problems that may have come up that may need to be addressed. Mr. Roberts stated that the PUD has to follow the approved site plan. The activities within the PUD have to follow the conditions of approval as adopted by the city council. If any significant changes are made, then approval has to be made by city council. This is more a merger of administrative functions rather than a merger of functions at the site. I Chairperson Fischer stated that the whole site is zoned for higher residential use. The number of units the applicant requested was less than half of what they could have requested. Commissioner Pearson stated that the initial application relied on a statement by the administrator of the Bloomington Tubman operation. Does Chrysalis work with them as well? And how does the Tubman group plan to avoid turning away people suffering from family violence if they are taking on this additional function? Ms. Brinkman stated the Bloomington office does not have any Chrysalis type services and the site in Maplewood will also not be changing the current services. This is just a merger of administration functions. This merger does not take away from any of the planned use. Commissioner Trippler stated this was a non issue. b) Executive Summary Report — South Maplewood Study (South Carver Avenue) Commissioner Trippler motioned to table this item to the next meeting. Commissioner Yarwood seconded the motion. Ayes — All The motion carried. WSJ Mayor Lon grie and Council Members Page I of 2 Attachment 4 fimmffg�� M ONNIN 101AINNN, JONWO. DUN 2= Randy Schutming Mayor DI ana I . Maplewood City Hall 1830 County Road 13 East Maplewoo(l MN 55109 Duar Mayor Longric: Mayor Longrie and Council Members Page 2 of 2 Bevt,Tlv Duiso Prcsid mt / ExecuLiw Director Agenda Item L1 TO: City Manager FROM: Tom EkStrand. Senior Planner SUBJECT: Regent at Legacy Village LOCATION: SE Corner of Legacy Parkway and Kennard Street [)ATE: September 4,2UUy Frank James, of the Hartford Group, is requesting approval of revised plans for the Regent ot Maplewood, the senior apartment building 8t Legacy Village. The project was originally approved to have 120 units of assisted living when the PUO (planned unit development) was approved iO20O3. Last year, the community design review board (C[)F<B) approved the development plans which had the number Of units reduced tO110 indRpendent'|ivinQUnitS. Now, the applicant has revised their plans LO expand the complex to a 150-unit facility consisting of 80 independent-living units, 40 assisted-living units 15 intensive-care suites and 15 memory-care suites. This revised proposal requires the following approvals from the city council: * A revision tO the approved Legacy Village development concept plan because 0fthe proposed increase from 120bJ15Ounits. Also, @ unit-size reduction from 58O square feet to 400 square feet for the intensive- and memory-care units. 0 A parking reduction from 300 to 145 parking stalls. ~ Design plans. A. Approve the density increase from 120LV150 and the unit-size reduction from 58Uk] 400 square feet for the intensive- and memory-care suites. B. Approve 8 parking waiver tn provide 1OO underground and 45 on-grade parking spaces rather than the 300 required by ordinance. C. Approve the revised plans date-stamped August 20,2O07. T{}: City Manager FROM: Tom EkStr8nd, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Regent at Legacy Village LOCATION: SE Corner Of Legacy Parkway and Kennard Street DATE: September 4.2007 Frank James, of the Hartford Group, is requesting approval of revised plans for the Regent @t Maplewood, the senior apartment building ot Legacy Village. The project vv83 originally approved to have 120 units of assisted living when the PUU (planned Unit development) was approved in2003. Last year, the community design review board (CDRB) approved the development plans which had the number of units reduced to 116 independenUivingunita. Now, the applicant has revised their plans to expand the complex to a 150-unit facility consisting of 80 independent-living units, 40 assisted-living units 15 iDtSDSiv8-C@r8 suites and 15 [n9[nOry-C@PS suites. /This [nix iS slightly different from that described in the applicant's narrative where he breaks it down with 87 independent-living units, 48 assisted-living units and 15 units Vf intensive-care GUiL8G.\ Refer to the applicant's narrative. This revised proposal requires the following approvals: w A revision to the approved Legacy Village development concept plan because Ofthe proposed increase from 120k)150units. Also, the applicant is requesting that the unit size for their 30 intensive-care and memory-care units be reduced from the required 580 square feet tO4OO square feet. Approval of8parking reduction. The city code requires two parking stalls for each unit, one Vf which must be8garage space. The applicant iS proposing 8 total nf145 parking stalls consisting Of100 garage spaces and 45 surface parking spaces. (As with the revision in the unit mix stated 8bovH, the applicant's narrative originally proposed 131 npeoae--1OO underground and 31onsite. Since their original submittal, they have added 14 more parking spaces on site. * Approval Cf design plans. July 14,2O03: The city council approved the Legacy Village PU[]. comprehensive plan amendment, tax-abatement plan, and preliminary plat. Refer k} the approved PU[} concept plan. Since the council approved the Legacy Village PUD. the following projects have been • Heritage Square TVvvnhVnl8S(Z2O units) — under construction • Heritage Square 2' Addition /81 VnitG\ — Under construction • VVvngaie Rental TovvnhVnn8S/5U units) —completed • Ashley Furniture —completed • Kennard Professional Building —completed • Maplewood Sculpture Park —completed • Legacy ShoppeS Retail — not started • Ramsey County Library —completed DISCUSSION PUD Revision tmIncrease Number mfUnits Staff reviewed the density allowed in the original PUD approved in 2003. At that bnne. the Legacy Village residential density included the following: For-Sale Tovvnhom8S 250 units R8nL8|T0wnhonleG 198 units VVvngot8 Rental lFOwnhOnoeS 50 units Seniors Apartments 120 units Total 618 units The actual development densities that have occurred, or are proposed, are as follows: For-Sale TOvvDhO[D8S (Heritage Square) Rental T0vvDhO[n9S East Of Kennard St. (Heritage Square ||\ Renta|lovvnh0nne3 West of Kennard St (Legacy TnvxnhOnneSofMaplewood) VVyng8t8 Rent8|TVvvnhomes Seniors Apartments 220 units 81 units 91 units remaining to be built 50 units 150 units Total 592 units As the totals show, the proposed built-out density for Legacy Village will U828units less than originally 8pprov8d. The affect om the site itself should not cause any problem since the residents OD this site would not generate the quantity of traffic o nOrD8| multi- family development would generate. Staff, therefore, G8eS no pn}b|8nl with the proposed increase in density for the proposed senior complex. Parking Reduction Cho Code requires two parking stalls for each Unit, or in this case, 300 parking ato|a. Half of these, or 150, must be garage spaces. The applicant is proposing a total of 145 2 parking stalls. One hundred would be garage spaces and 45 would b8 open parking spaces. Staff had concerns about whether there would be enough parking for the residents, staff and visitors during peak visiting days /K8Oth8r'S Day, Father's Day, holidays, StC\ A|BO. there would b8no area available for future parking should 8 shortage develop. The applicant addressed these concerns with the following statement: ^N/e anticipate staff levels /DbeY7to20 employees 8tpeak times and 3t04overnight staff, with GD average 0f10/0Y2 staff nn site 8t any time. Based 0D our direct experience at Reo9n/at Burnsville senior project, DDwhich/h9Maplem0odproject is based, only 40/D500fthe underground spaces will bR reserved and used bvresidents G/ any one tine. (Burnsville has Y36 units and Q2UG spaces, Of which only 30to48 have been reserved and used 8t any time over the past 3years.} Accordingly, there /s plenty 0f room for staff to use the underground parking. Assuming 500G spaces used for residents and 20 for staff (this /8gmaximum 8s8Unption), there would still be@n additional 30 spaces available for tgnnilW4vis/tDr overflow parking in the underground garage and the entire surface parking lot for holidaysIspecial events, etc. Also, there are 8 few spaces Onthe surrounding streets. The 3Y (now 4fB spaces include those covered under the city parking easement. However, given the available parking described above /dO not believe this will cause any problem. " Last year, the Regent was approved to have 188 parking stalls io serve 110 independent-living units. This was 1.55 parking spaces per unit. Presently, the new Regent proposal would have 145 parking spaces for 150 units or.9 spaces per unit. The main difference now, however, is that there would be 80 independent-living units and the rest would be assisted-living (40) and intensive- or memory-care (30) units rather than them all being independent-living units like previously proposed. |tiSafair assumption that none of the "intensive-care" residents will drive and likely most of the "8SSiShed-|iviDg'' residents will not @Swell. This leaves the primary drivers tObS those iD the 8O independent-living units. With these figures considered, it seems reasonable that the proposed 145 units will suffice for this project. Shared Access and Paddno Another parking consideration is that the applicant and the city have 8nagreement that six parking spaces shall b8 available for sculpture-park parking. Reserving these six spaces for park use will lessen the number of parking spaces available for the Regent complex. This shared-parking agreement was arranged by Bruce Anderson, the former Parks and Recreation Director, and the applicant. The applicant should enter into 8 cross-easement agreement with the city which would guarantee the sculpture-park parking rights and to establish maintenance responsibility. Proof of Parkina The current plan does not include any Dg spaces 8Soriginally recommended bv the city council. Likely, the amount Of parking proposed will suffice for the needs of this facility, but the use of underground parking for visitors seems 3 unrealistic. It is not likely that 8 visitor will know that they can park in the underground garage if the surface spaces are full. The applicant may need tO utilize garage parking for staff and residents as their primary parking area and reserve the surface spaces for visitors and the half a dozen park spaces. Another problem would beif the use Vfthe building changed hJ that Ofmore independent-living units. In this event, there could b8@ greater demand on the 8v8i|8b|8 parking stalls. Unit-Size Reduction All the room sizes meet the city code minimums for square footage with the exception of the "Studio Care" efficiency-size apartments for residents with greater medical needs. The srnG||eSt unit size a||Vvv8d by the city ordinance is for efficiency units Ek580square feet. The proposed units would have 4O0 square feet. Based on the applicant's explanation at the planning commission meeting, the proposed unit sizes should suffice and nn98t industry standards. The planning CVnnnnisSiVn, however, requested that staff check other cities for their criteria @SGcomparison. Staff has talked t0 the planning StGffa in the cities of Woodbury, Roseville and VVhiL8 Bear Lake. Each of these cities said that they do not have unit-size criteria for intensive- or memory-care units. They all utilize the PUD process for approval of units that are small than their smallest allowed units for such housing developments. They feel that the PUD process provides a proper review procedure to analyze the specifics of a senior housing development such 8s this one. Through this process, they can determine whether the unit sizes proposed iSappropriate. These planners further agreed that 8set of specific minimum room-size requirements for such units would be hard to establish. It would seem almost inevitable that future cases would involve the developer asking for a waiver from the unit size requirements if they wound Up being slightly below the determined square footage. Parking and Unit-Size Summation Staff asked the planning staffs of Woodbury, ROG8vi||8 and White Bear Lake for their opinions about parking for @ senior-housing complex like this. Those | asked said that it ranges from requiring half of the normal parking for senior housing to around one per unit. None of them had a criterion for intensive- or memory-care units and it was felt that none were needed oS these residents would not drive. Staff k5 inclined k} accept the applicant's proposal for 8 parking reduction. Staff recommends that the management be required to make their staff and residents use the garage 8s their primary parking lot should surface parking become short. Staff isrelying on the applicant's justification and on the realization that this use will not change to a higher multi-family use. |n fact, the parking limitations will prevent such 8conversion ShVU|d that be considered in the future. The sizes proposed for the intensive- and nnRmOry-C8[8 Undo seem appropriate based on the applicant's justification. They have explained that this size unit iG8Oindustry standard in consideration of the fact that the residents do not require more space based on their health. The facility is also set Upto provide considerable CononoOn living space for the residents. The rooms are essentially a large bedroom with 8 small dinette and b8thn3OQn. The city also approved units of 221 to 380 SqU8nS feet for the Comforts Of Home which were smaller than those proposed for the Regent. M Building and Site Considerations The proposed building i8attractive. The materials proposed are no-maintenance and are compatible with the design ond8ntSr0rnl8t9h8|OfthRGxSUngLRg@CyViU8gS structures. The proposed exterior materials are, horizontal-lap vinyl siding, brick and rock-face concrete block. The connnnVnib/ design r8v8vv board recommended that the vinyl siding be replaced with H8rdi Board, cement-composite siding. Staff feels that the vinyl proposed iSabetter ChOioR in this C@S8 since Hondi Board will p8qUiPS periodic repainting and due tO the four- story height of the sLnJ{tVrH, it may become considerably more difficult to keep up with this maintenance. |t would be8 detriment L0 the applicant and the neighbors ifpeeling paint was not corrected promptly. The other tovvDhOnn8Sat legacy Village also are built with vinyl siding, so vinyl in this case would be in character and compatible with the other SbuCtVr8G. Landscaping The proposed landscaping would bS attractive and iD compliance with the PUD conditions. Staff |S recommending, though, that the plan b8 revised LO make the corner landscaping feature at the roundabout of taller plantings to match those planted at the other corners. Also, there should be two additional trees planted east Of the main entrance drive and in the yard area at the northwest corner of the site by the intersection. Trash Storage The applicant has not shown any outdoor storage area for trash Or recycling containers. The lower level, the garage level, shows that there will b8 trash storage in the garage 8r88. It trash is later stored outdoors, it must be within an architecturally-compatible trash enclosure. The oity, furthermore, is now requiring recycling containers for multi- family properties. Retaining Walls There are retaining walls shown on the original site plan. Retaining walls that exceed 8 height of four feet must have a fence or guardrail on top for safety and must be designed by a structural engineer. The site iS surrounded bv sidewalks along the two streets k} the north and west and bv the park trails t0 the south and east. Sidewalk connections are proposed bJconnect these pedestrian ways. 9 Site Lighting The original Dh0t0m8thnp|@nh@Sbe8npr8p8[8d8ndnle9tSoitvr8qUirRm9nt3. The proposed increase in living density should have no effect on this. Engineering Comments Refer to the engineer's report. Building Official's Comments Dave Fisher, K88o|evvooU Building C)ffiCh3, gave the fodk}VVOQ 0nD7meDtG: w The city will require 8complete building code analysis when the construction plans are submitted to the city for building permits. * All exiting must g0b]8public way. * Provide adequate fire department access t0 the buildings. * The developer should have apr8CVnsLnJcUOn meeting with the contractor, the project manager and the city building inspection department. Police Comments Lieutenant Kevin Robbet reviewed the new proposal and stated that there were nO public safety concerns with the revised plan. Fire Marshal Butch G8rv8is,th8 K88o|8vvOOd Fire K8orSh@[ reviewed the new proposal and requires the following to be provided or accomplished: • Fire protection per code • Fire alarm per code • A2O-h}oL+widH fire department access road • A fire department key box (order from A{|/FK8\ • Annunciation panel 8t the main entrance • Room directions • Proper marking 0ffire pnJtRCtiOD nDO[n and fire G|8[Ol n}0nl COMMITTEE ACTIONS August 21 The planning commission moved bJ approve recommend approval of the PUD revision with the unit-size reduction for the intensive- and memory-care units. They, however, moved that they not be smaller than those permitted for the ones at The N Shores. This minimum unit size approved was 4SU square feet. The planning commission also recommended approval of the parking-reduction to 145 spaces and specified that the parking spaces must not be less than 9 Y2feet wide. August 28.20O7: The community design [GvRvvbO@rdr8C0nlmSOd8d@pprOvG|Ofth8 design plans with the stipulation that the vinyl Siding be replaced with H8rdi Board siding since that would be more durable. The board also required that the six parking spaces, designated for the Sculpture Park, be appropriately signed so park users know which are available for them. A. Adopt the attached resolution to approve plans date-stamped August 20, 2007 for the revision LVthe previou G|y'8pp roved PUO concept plan allowing the Regent 8LLegacy Village senior building tO increase the number Of units from 12Uto15O. lFhisPUD revision also allows the reduction in the square-foot area of the intensive-care units from 588 square feet tV4UU square feet. Approval iS based on the findings required by ordinance and because 0f the following reasons: 1. The proposed built-out density of the entire Legacy Village PUD will be less than that originally approved by 26 units. 2. The affect on the site itself should not cause an overcrowding problem since the residents on this site would not generate the quantity of traffic a normal multi-family development would. 3. The nnininnVnn OmJp8n]8 requirement of 580 SqV8n] feet was intended for typical '' efficiency" apartments. The proposed unit sizes should suffice in this instance since they are for persons with limited mobility that need medical assistance. B. Approval ofa parking waiver k] provide 10U underground and 45 on-grade parking spaces rather than the 3OOrequired by ordinance. Approval is because the proposed senior housing complex would not generate the amount of traffic associated with typical [nU|ti-f8rDi|y uses. This parking reduction Of 155 SpoC8s is subject to the requirements of city ordinance should the use of the building be proposed for 8 change to8 higher traffic- generating use. Staff shall also determine whether the three surface parking sto||S proposed in the turnaround area are feasible. U they are not, they shall beomitted. C. Approve the revised plans date-stamped August 20, 2007 for the Regent at Legacy Village. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this 2. Before getting 8 building permit, the applicant Sh8U revise the plans or do the following for staff approval: a Enter into 8 agreement with the city for the shared parking spaces for the use of the city's abutting sculpture park. This agreement shall be prepared by the oho attorney and shall require that the developer of the senior complex be responsible for driveway maintenance and snowplowing. This agreement shall b8 subject k} the requirements Cf the director Vfpublic vvOrKS. ~ Provide the city with cash escrow orGD irrevocable letter of credit for the * Meet all requirements of the engineering report by Jon Jarosch dated July 5, ° Provide engineered plans to the building official for all retaining vva||8 that exceed four feet iD height @Snl88SurSdfnomthebOtbJrnOfth8fo0tn0. All retaining vv8||G that are four feet tall or taller Sh8|| have G pnJh3cbv8 fence or guardrail ontop. w Provide a site and design plan for the screening Of any trash and recycling containers if they would be kept outside. Should o trash enclosure area be proposed in the future, it shall not b8 placed in any parking space. * Provide 8 screening plan for any exterior utility meters, if there would bS outside nnRtSrS. SUbiRCt t0 the r8qUir8nl8OtS of the CO[nnlUOitv design review * Provide Sidevv8|kS to the existing trails and public sidewalks as required by the original PU0opprova. The location of these sidewalks iSdependent upon the location of exits from the building. 3. Before getting 8 certificate Of occupancy, the applicant shall: • Comply with or complete all aspects 0f these plans 0r any required revisions. • Provide in-ground |8vvn irrigation as shown on the plans. • |nSL8|| traffic and address signs, subject to staff approval. • Install wetland-protection buffer signs around the west side of the abutting vvei|8nd area. 4. The community design review board shall review major changes to these plans. Minor changes may be approved by staff. 5. The six Sculpture Park parking spaces shall b8 signed accordingly subject to staff M CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the 08 property OvvnSrG within 500 feet of this site for their C0mnlRntS. | received one response. That was bvtelephone. This person did not give their name and was in opposition to the proposal. They were not 8vvar9 that this senior building was part 0f the Legacy Village F`U[). SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 3anrno Existing Use: Undeveloped SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Legacy Parkway and the Kennard Professional Building South: Birch Run Station Shopping Center East: K88p|8vvOOd Sculpture Park VVRSt Kennard Street and the Heritage Squ8r8lFOvvnhOnlea Land Use Plan: R3H (high denahore3denba|) Zoning: PUD We received the complete application and plans for this proposal on July 21.2O0Y. State |@vv requires that the city take action within 00 days Of receiving COmo|Gt8 applications. A decision on this request iG required bv September 1S,2O07, unless the applicant agrees 0J8 time extension. p:nan3\ entSnrn 807 CC Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Legacy Village PUD Concept Plan 3. Site/LandsmapeP|an 4. Building Elevations 5. Project Summary from Hartford Group G. Engineering report dated July 15.2U07 7. Resolution 8. Plans date-stamped August 2O.2U07 (separate attachment) 9 E � d d i t dt tl 4t �t dl d l � ��...,ww�......w®..-..._..._..y..»,»...u._—u...e_�_www....�..,--�.......®._._.,....._.u� d t t Attachment I yy ypn`( yy W d CY P" y. 4 I � h LEGACY P t t t I¢ I I h { I t i�OBB =3r i i 5 PROPOSED d t REGENT APARTMENT 4 t I t 1 �I pd d LOCATION MAP ® � I "."" ".��—'®:...--®.......,....—.......�....�...—.—.....-�.:—...v..-..-........gym. ........ .....w.....u. w..,.. 'fit.,. «w-...�. ..-.'—.....- "'—«..m......... w . 0 Attachment 2 Attachment 3 I �I� t e � aid � � 1' I ® �� gag! � � I =4 7 7' ki - i rt to lai rTT M r7777 f i l l I b I �I� t e � aid � � 1' I ® �� gag! � � I =4 7 7' ki - i rt to lai Attachment 4 i i� F POKMWNU Is m mm� �k � \ � / �? \ � .. � »& !. {, � / \� Li « # ) \ 0 0 /* Attachment "' M HARTFORD SWIM June 12, 2007 l[Id AI REGENT AT NUPLEWOOD MUM LWAM ) WO Hi EMU B ; 952-838-2401 i Hartford rcquesu an amembnent/vvaiver of the e Lepcy ViUge PUD to allow 150 units at the Regent prplect. 9 F ME iffillilliffill rmi I I or m I 1 � i 1 11 1 i ii i i mmmmm��� I it I AGING IN PLACE 7900 Xerxes Avenue South - Su* 130c - 5kxx�'Ongton, ON 55431 - 952-838-2400 (P) - 952-838-2401 (F) -M��n WIM IM 4*1 Hiff3imics OW. IPA. 1 Assisted Lj�tg The Assisted Uving option will provide a special combination of residential housia& standard Personalized supportive Services and ongoing healfficam Regent Assisted T-jvmg is designed to meet the a. Wee house Medication t- d reminders + PersonaEzed health an d m Additional housekeeping Case management by health care professional Tailore . e d health related ic as needed Rehabil itation servioes Personal dry services MIM Jim Specific travel services will also be available to residents as requested. 1900 Xerxes Aveme Sout + SUft 13 • BbCmIn9tGn, MN 55431 * 952 - 338 -24 (P) - 952- 838-2401 ('F) Attachment 6 Page I of 3 Eneineerine Plan Review # 2 PROJECT: ood p Regent st Maplew Devc4oment PROJECT NO: 06-19 REVIEWED RY- Ion Jarosch, Staff Engineer DATE- July 5,2007 Mliscellaneous 2, A detailed definition for the aczess easements shown shall be submitted to the City of Maplewood. 3. Please submit a set of plans to the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District for their approval. !fJLJLM# *EWI RIV@1411 MIIEftJILIIG#tPA=IJVW.I!V IN* I 5� The developer or project engineer shall submit a copy of the NQCA's construction i (SWPPP)toth c* beforethecitywi is r stormwater permit e ity 11 J sue a gradi S permit for this projecL 7� The developer and project engineer shall satisfy the requirements of all other permitting agencies. Aft8OhOleOt7 "LANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVISION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, The Hartford Group applied for 8 revision to the planned unit development (PLID) for The Regent, the senior's housing complex at Legacy Village of K88p|evvnod. The proposed PUD revision was tO increase the pnaviOUS|y-8pproved density from 120 to 150 nnV|U-fanni|y units. This PUO revision also includes reduction in unit size for the 3U intensive-care and memory-care units from 580 square feet tV4O0 square feet. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the three-acre site in Legacy Village lying southeast of the intersection of Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway. Drive. The legal description is: Lot 1 Block 3Of Legacy Village OfMaplewood. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: C)n August 21.2UU7. the planning commission held 8 public hearing k} review these requests. City staff published @ notice iD the paper and sent notices t0 the surrounding property owners GS required bylaw. The planning commission gave everyone 8t the hearing 8 chance k]speak and present written statements. The planning commission also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff. 2. The city council reviewed this proposal and considered the planning commission's recommendation nn September 1O.2OO7. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and those in attendance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED that the city council the above-described PU0 revision based 0O plans date-stamped August 2O.20O7because: The use would be located, designed, nnaint8ined.oOnstnJct8d@nd operated tobeinconformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing Or planned character Ofthe surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing Vr cause 8 nuisance k} any person 0r property, because [f excessive noise. g|ona. smoke, dust, OdOr, fumes, water Or air pollution, dn8in80H. vv8L9r run-off, vibration, Q8n8n8| unsightliness, 8|HcLhc8| interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic On local streets and would not create traffic congestion 0r unsafe access On existing Or proposed streets. 8. The use would be served bv adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 10. The proposed built-out density of the entire Legacy Village PUD will be less than that originally approved by 26 units. 11. The affect on the sit itself should not cause Gn overcrowding problem since the residents on the site would not generate the quantity Uf traffic 8 typical multi-family development would. 12. The nnininnUnn fk}Vr-8n]8 requirement of 580 sqV8n] feet was intended for typical "8ffiCkeOcv"apartments. The proposed unit sizes should suffice iD this instance since they are for persons with |irniL8d mobility that need noedio8| assistance. The Maplewood City Council this resolution Vn September 1O. 2007. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, August 21, 2007 V. PUBLIC HEARING The Regents Senior Housing Development (Kennard Street & Legacy Parkway) (7:11- 8:55) a. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Revisions • . ' • Tom Ekstrand introduced the proposal. The applicant is requesting that the city approve a proposed increase in the number of units from 120 units to 150 units and a reduction in the size of the memory care units from 580 square feet to 400 square feet, which is under the minimum 580 square feet required by city code for an efficiency unit for a multi- family residence. The Applicant is also requesting approval of a parking reduction to 145 parking spaces. With this proposal, the overall density of the Legacy Village Development would be under the approved limit of 618 units by 26 units. Staff does not find any problems with the overall density of the development. There is no proof of parking shown in the proposal. City staff is in favor of the proposed number of parking spaces and overall density. City staff also is in favor of the reduction in size of the memory care units. Chairperson Fischer confirmed that the proposed parking spaces meet the required 9.5 feet minimum. Chairperson Fischer asked how the parking variances compare to the proposal presented to the Planning Commission last week regarding the size of the units and the number of parking stalls. Mr. Ekstrand responded that there is a higher parking ratio with this development compared to the number of parking spaces the city approved for The Shores project on Frost Avenue. Commissioner Trippler pointed out that the parking spaces are labeled in the packet as 9 feet wide. Mr. Ekstrand responded that the revised map shows the parking spaces as 9.5 feet wide. Staff will have to review the parking stall size and verify the width. Commissioner Trippler stated that the Planning Commission has made it very clear that 9 foot wide parking stalls for mainly elderly residents is ridiculous and he will not vote for any proposal that has 9 foot wide stalls. He is also uncomfortable voting for the reduction in size of the memory care units to 400 square feet. The city needs to define specific requirements for room sizes instead of granting variances for special situations, which could possibly become reoccurring requests. Planning Commission 2 Minutes of 08-21-07 Chairperson Fischer asked if there are any standards set for nursing home unit sizes and if there are any standards set by the state. Ken Roberts responded there are no standards set by the city, but the architect may know. If the whole commission feels strongly about the parking issues and unit sizes, then the staff would recommend that the commission should make a separate recommendation to the council to ask the council to direct staff to do research for possible code amendments. Chairperson Fischer asked if it is a correct assumption that everything proposed here is out of the wetland situation and meets the entire requirement for that. Mr. Ekstrand said yes. Commissioner Hess stated that he has similar concerns as Commissioner Trippler in regards to the parking stall sizes and the undersized units. There is a ten acre out-lot on the map for parking, Commissioner Hess asked if that was provided by the city or the developer. Mr. Ekstrand stated that out-lot was provided by the city and is already in existence, it is for the Sculpture Garden. Commissioner Martin asked how far this development is from the Myth Night Club. Mr. Ekstrand stated that it is about 2-3 blocks away. Commissioner Martin stated that he can foresee traffic flow issues with this development being so close the night club. It is a possibility the people may park in the Regent's parking area when attending the night club. Mr. Ekstrand stated that he does not foresee a problem and that this is far enough away that parking should not be a problem. This exact type of development was approved with the PUD in 2003, as far as the use concern, this has already been allowed. This meeting is just covering the proposed changes in density. Commissioner Martin stated that he also has similar concerns as Commissioner Trippler in regards to density issues. Mr. Roberts stated that most of the proposed parking will be underground in a secured facility. Commissioner Walton stated that this proposed development has a smaller amount of acreage but a similar amount of parking and number of units compared to the Shores. Commissioner Hess asked what the finished floor elevations of the building would be, as they relate to flood potential. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-21-07 Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director, stated that the entire storm sewer system for the Legacy Village area was a very complex plan and was developed as part of the entire plan. There was a very detailed analysis done on flooding potential and the overflow from the ponds. The last thing that was done was providing storm water overflow corridors, should an intensive rainfall occur. Commissioner Hess stated on Page 5, the last point under the Building Official's Comments, should read as, "The developer should shall have a preconstruction meeting with the contractor..." just ensure that the meeting does happen. Mr. Roberts said that staff will bring that to the Building Official's attention. Commissioner Yarwood stated that the applicant should provide some justification as to why the memory care units should be reduced to 400 square feet. He is hesitant to approve units in this city that are this small, in the case they may not always be used for senior housing. If the applicant is having trouble finding enough space for adequate parking space, then maybe the applicant should rethink the number of units in the development. Frank Janes, with Hartford Group, addressed the commission. This development was approved for a slightly different senior use last fall. Due to residential and housing market changes, we have re-looked over the project as a senior housing use. Hartford has a number of senior housing projects going on in the metro-area currently. After speaking with Mr. Ekstrand about concerns about the proposal before this meeting, Hartford Group made some revisions to address some of those concerns. Every parking stall above and underground is 9.5 feet wide. There are 102 underground parking spaces, and 45 surface parking spaces. This project would be a continuum care facility. This offers a number of different options to the residents of the development. The different types of units include independent, assisted care suites and memory care, which are categories of units to help define the services provided. The independent use is not an age restricted senior condo or apartment building. The independent units would occupy about half of the non-memory care units. This usually would attract an older demographic compared to other senior housing developments. The next level of care is the assisted living, which has more services provided including 3 meals a day. The care suites would have a 5-to-1 full-time staffing ratio for residents who require a high level of medical and personal care. These units are not considered nursing home units; however, residents would not be driving. The memory care, dementia, or Alzheimer's units provide services including an enclosed outdoor walking area. These residents would also not be driving and require a higher level of care and staff ratio. In regards to parking, this site is comparable to the Regents facility in Burnsville, which has 136 total units, with 92 underground parking stalls and 45 surface parking stalls. At any one time the most spaces that are occupied at a time are 40 spaces. With this project, there are 150 total units, but the memory care and the care suites are taken out because those residents are not driving. Then there are 120 units, for which there are 102 underground parking spaces, and 45 surface stalls. This gives the facility 147 parking stalls for 120 units of potential drivers. From experience with past projects, there will still be plenty of parking spaces for the residents as well as staff and visitors. Planning Commission 4 Minutes of 08-21-07 Regarding the proposed reduction in size of the memory care units, 400 square feet units is the size that is provided all over the market in the metro-area and in other areas. It is necessary to have a smaller unit because it has been found that the larger units tend to be more confusing and difficult for the residents to get around in. Hartford Group is confident that 400 square feet is an appropriate size for the unit. The sizes of the independent and assisted living units are much bigger, as they should be. The memory care and care suites are designed to be smaller on purpose and that is the norm. Commissioner Martin asked how much smaller can these rooms get. Mr. Janes responded that he cannot answer that but the project architect may be able to answer that more in depth. It is not possible that this facility could be used as a senior apartment building in the future because of the amount of parking and the facilities inside of the building, which include an industrial sized kitchen and other common space. This facility is too specifically designed to be converted for another use later on. Commissioner Martin stated that in other areas of the country, there are studio apartments that are smaller than this. Why is the developer not making these rooms smaller? Mr. Janes responded that those types of units would not be marketable. Commissioner Trippler Confirmed that the 400 square feet units are for both the 15 intensive care units and the 15 memory care units. Commissioner Trippler stated that in the given documentation, it only requests the reduction for the 15 intensive care units. Mr. Janes said that the commission has the original submission. Revisions have been made and city staff has those revisions. Commissioner Trippler asked if there is a restroom facility included in each of the intensive care units, if so, how large is it. Mr. Janes asked Tom Wasserman to address the commission. Tom Wasserman, the director of architecture with the Hartford group, addressed the commission. Mr. Wasserman went over the floor plans for the units. Typically, in other projects, room sizes range from 300-1000 square feet. The typical nursing home suite is between 250-300 square feet. A 400 square foot room is typically for 2 people sharing a space. Also, the residents in these memory care and care suites are usually short-term residents. The restrooms are a minimum of 6 ft by 8 ft spaces. The memory care and care suites residents will utilize the common space more than the independent and assisted residents. This helps in the healing process. Commissioner Yarwood stated that it is clear that there is no provision in the Maplewood code for this particular type of housing unit. Before the commission moves forward with approving a concept like this, the city needs to direct city staff to get a reference point as to how and if city code should accommodate these types of unit. The commission does not have the basis to approve a 400 square foot unit. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-21-07 Commissioner Desai asked what the average time a person spends in this intensive care unit. Mr. Wasserman said they can stay anywhere from 2-3 weeks to as long as a year and a half. The average is 3-6 months. Commissioner Pearson stated he is not concerned about the room sizes because he has had his mother and mother-in-law stay in assisted living before they died. Their final years were in a 12 by 14 foot room and he did not feel in any way that their dignity was compromised in any way. The City of Maplewood should try to have a variety of spaces for residents to choose from, which will fit their physical and financial needs. Commissioner Boeser asked if there is a health care professional that can speak to the issues of room size as for quality of life. Mr. Wasserman said there is none at this meeting. Also, addressing concerns of density on this 3 acre site, the size of this facility was determined at the beginning of Legacy Village project and there is also a 9 acre city park with walking trails, the Sculpture Park and the new city library adjacent to the site. Chairperson Fischer opened the discussion to the public. Don Shiek of 1601 Woodlynn Avenue addressed the commission. Mr. Shiek is concerned about the impact this proposal could have on the housing values in the neighborhood. He does not like the fact that the building is four stories, where the majority of everything is two stories in the neighborhood. Mr. Shiek requests that the building be lowered in height. Commissioner Walton asked for clarification on the height of the building and if this is in the scope of discussion. Mr. Ekstrand stated that this building has already been approved as a four story building. This is a story higher than city code states for an apartment/multi-family structure. Chairperson Fischer stated the Planning Commission is not looking at a new plan, but a revision on a previously approved plan. Commissioner Hess asked if there are any other four story buildings in the Legacy Village area. Mr. Ekstrand stated there are no other four story buildings, only two stories. Mr. Roberts stated the new medical office building is to the north of the Regents site and that building is about 2.5 stories. The office building is also at a higher elevation so the Regents will not look out of scale. Commissioner Trippler asked staff if there is any indication of an office complex being built in the future that is more than four stories high near this site. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-21-07 Mr. Ekstrand stated that another structure similar to the medical office building may be built to the east of the existing building. Judith Johannesen of Legacy Village addressed the commission. Ms. Johannesen expressed concern about the placement of the structure and that it is placed to close to the street. She feels that it will feel like a four story wall next to the street. Ms. Johannesen stated that she is concerned about the number of parking spaces on holidays for visitors and is afraid that overflow parking may come into the street. Ms. Johannesen urges the commission not to approve the building as a four story building. Commissioner Trippler if the building is scaled down to three stories, will it be any less obtrusive than a four story being that close to the street. Ms. Johannesen stated that her main concern is the fact that it will not fit the scale of the rest of the area. Ron Cockeral of 943 Century Avenue addressed the commission. Mr. Cockeral asked if the runoff will be retained on the site. Mr. Cockeral is concerned about park funding. He is also in favor of the fourth story but wants to know if the city has the necessary safety needs incase of an emergency. Mr. AN stated that there are requirements that have to be met for water infiltration and runoff. Rain gardens will be installed on the property to aid in this. All of the water retention requirements have been met. The sculpture garden and park were developer funded on the site. These units will not help fund the parks. Mr. Wasserman stated that the building plans have been reviewed by fire safety officials and it is up to applicable codes. Patrick Sarver, the director of development with Hartford Group addressed the commission. Mr. Sarver went over the elevations of the building. He also stated that the building was encouraged to bring the building closer up to the road, to help create an urban front. Mr. Wasserman stated that this building has always been a four story building and was approved in the master planning as a four story building. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Yarwood stated that the height of the building is out of scope for what is before the board at this meeting. He is still concerned with the reduction in room size. Commissioner Yardwood would prefer to table this until an ordinance is in place that deals with these types of developments. Mr. Roberts stated that there isn't enough time to table this as this proposal has to go to the council by September. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-21-07 Mr. Ekstrand stated that it is possible to do research and bring that back to the commission at the next meeting to aid in this decision. This would just be information, not a code amendment. Commissioner Trippler stated that commission can make an amendment to the staff recommendation to say the units may not be less than 500 square feet. Commissioner Trippler stated that on page 5, under C, the date should be changed to read, "Approve the revised plans date-stamped August 20, 2007...." Mr. Ekstrand stated that the Planning Commission is only supposed cover items A and B. Chairperson Fischer asked if the case arises that the use of this building changes, is there any way to have verbiage in the proposal stating that the city has the right to demand more parking be added. Mr. Ekstrand said that can be done. Mr. Roberts said that it may be in the original proposal. That will be verified before this goes to council and if it is not in the proposal it will be added. Commissioner Pearson said he does not have a problem with reducing the care suites and memory care units to 400 square feet. Commissioner Walton stated that this proposal asks for an additional 90 square foot reduction from what was already approved for the Shores. This creates a slippery slope of more reductions in room sizes and a line should be drawn. Chairperson Fischer asked what types of common areas are there. That would help make this decision on whether this size would be adequate or not. Mr. Ekstrand said that will be looked into. Commissioner Yarwood said the appropriate action to be taken would be to approve the same size units that were approved for the Shores which was no less than 490 square feet. Anything lower should be done by a revision to the city ordinance. Commissioner Trippler recommended adoption of the attached resolution to the revision to the previously-approved PUD concept plan allowing the Regent at Legacy Village senior building to increase the number of units from 120 to 150. This PUD revision also allows the reduction in the square-foot area of the intensive-care and memory care units from 580 square feet to 489 not less than 490 square feet. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and because of the following reasons: 1. The proposed built-out density of the entire Legacy Village PUD will be less than that originally approved by 26 units. 2. The affect on the site itself should not cause an overcrowding problem since the residents on this site would not generate the quantity of traffic a normal multi-family development would. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-21-07 3. The minimum floor-area requirement of 580 square feet was intended for typical "efficiency" apartments. The proposed unit sizes should suffice in this instance since they are for persons with limited mobility that need medical assistance. B. Approval of a parking waiver to provide 100 underground and 45 on-grade 9.5 foot wide parking spaces rather than the 300 required by ordinance. Approval is because the proposed senior housing complex would not generate the amount of traffic associated with typical multi-family uses. This parking reduction of 469 155 spaces is subject to the requirements of city ordinance should the use of the building be proposed for a change to a higher traffic-generating use. Commissioner Pearson seconded the motion. Ayes — Desai, Fischer, Pearson, Trippler, Walton, Yarwood, Martin, Boeser Nays — Hess The motion passed. This will go before the city council on September 10 2007. Commissioner Yarwood motioned that the city council direct city staff to examine the ordinance for minimum square footage for assisted care and memory units to appropriately revise the city ordinance. Commissioner Pearson encouraged commissioners to tour local senior facilities in the area. Commissioner Martin seconded the motion. Chairperson Fischer made a friendly amendment that staff also research a parking amendment for senior facilities. Ayes — All The motion passed. This will go before the city council on September 10 2007. DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, August 28, 2007 a. Regents Senior Housing (Legacy Village — Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway) Tom Ekstrand, City Planner, introduced the proposal. The proposal is a revision to an already approved PUD. The applicant, the Hartford Group, is requesting that the city approve the proposed increase in the number of units from 120 to 150 units. The applicant also requested a reduction in the unit size of the memory care and intensive care units from 580 to 400 square feet. The Planning Commission approved a reduction in the units to 490 square feet. The applicant is proposing changes to the architecture of the building and the landscaping. Mr. Ekstrand went over the proposed changes. City Staff recommends approval of the revisions to the architecture of the proposal and the landscaping. Chairperson Olson asked how this project compared with The Shores on Frost Avenue, which was approved at the August 13 city council meeting. Mr. Ekstrand stated that this proposal is smaller than The Shores, which has 180 units. This proposal provides similar services but has different ratios of those services. The Regents proposal also has a larger parking ratio. Chairperson Olson asked if there are similar common areas and amenities provided as proposed for The Shores facility. Mr. Ekstrand stated that the regents provides some similar amenities and common areas, but not as many. Chairperson Olson asked if this project was originally proposed as three story building, not as a four story building as it is now. Mr. Ekstrand stated that The Regents has always been presented as a four story building. The applicant has also added Board member Wise stated that after a discussion with Mr. Ekstrand prior to this meeting, he agrees that senior housing units do not necessarily need as many parking spaces as a single- family complex. However, with the possibility of having parking spaces reserved for the adjacent Sculpture Garden, he is concerned that there may not be enough parking. Board member Wise requested clarification on the access points of the site for the residents, compared to the previous proposal. Mr. Ekstrand stated the access points are the same as previously proposed. Board member Demko questioned which spaces would be reserved for the park and if the park has any other parking available. Community Design Review Board 2 Minutes 06-12-2007 Mr. Ekstrand showed on a map where the spaces would probably be. The Sculpture Garden only has street parking. Chairperson Olson asked what the city's position is on managing the Sculpture Garden and if it is still a possibility. Mr. Ekstrand stated that it is already in existence and the city is waiting on more funding to add more sculptures. Chairperson Olson stated she is concerned about the pervious surface. She is also disappointed in the lack of accessible housing for healthy seniors and amenities in terms of park space or play space for this area. Board member Wise asked if this building would obstruct the residents' current view of any significant. Mr. Ekstrand stated the residents to the west of the site will loose their view of the sculpture garden. However, this building was approved as part of the plan for the area and has always been approved as a four story building. The board members discussed the sidewalk connections in the Legacy Village area. Frank Janes of the Hartford Group addressed the board. Mr. Janes went over the different types of common areas and amenities of the proposed building. Mr. Janes discussed the parking concerns. From experience with the Regents Senior Facility currently existing in Burnsville, the proposed number of parking spaces will be more than sufficient for the proposed facility in Maplewood. The parking ratio in Burnsville is .6 of the number of units; where as the ratio for The Regents in Maplewood is .9. There is an agreement with the city, which will be finalized and recorded, which will provide 6 parking spaces for the use of the Sculpture Garden. Proper signage for this parking will be installed to notify the public that these parking spaces are available. The library is also on the other side of the park, which may provide parking areas as well. Also, 30 of the proposed units will be intensive care and memory care units, which will house residents that cannot drive. Chairperson Olson asked how many staff will be working at any time. Mr. Janes stated that there may be 4-5 staff members working overnight, 11-15 staff members during the daytime hours, and around 30 staff members on duty for a short period of time during shift changes. Chairperson Olson stated some concern that 4-5 staff members overnight may not be sufficient. Mr. Janes stated that the independent and the assisted living may not need as much assistance overnight. The memory care and intensive care units will need more staff attention. Mr. Janes addressed concerns about the density of site. He asked that the board keep in mind that Legacy Village was designed as whole and that there is a 9 acre park next to the site. Community Design Review Board 3 Minutes 06-12-2007 Chairperson Olson requested to look at the samples of the materials proposed for this facility. Mr. Janes provided the samples to the board and went over them. Pat Server, the director of Architecture from the Hartford Group addressed the board. He stated that the original proposal had the whole building be four stories across. The revised proposal attempts to incorporate four separate family type wings and is two stories. The architecture reflects this and the center entrance separates those four wings. Instead of appearing as one large building, it appears as a series of buildings. He then went over architectural details. Board member Wise asked why there is such a strong comparison to the facility in Burnsville, as it is only three years old. Does the developer have other experience with this type of facility? Mr. Server stated The Regents in Maplewood is so strongly compared to the Regents in Burnsville because they are almost identical, in terms of provided services. Hartford Group has also developed other similar facilities that add to their experience. Board member Wise asked what industry standards dictate for parking needs for these types of facilities. Mr. Server stated that an independent unit includes 1 meal a day, which is included in the rent, and the availability of services of nursing care, cleaning, cooking, etc. This is a step up from a conventional senior apartment complex. Assisted living provides a higher level of care. This type of facility provides much more specialized services than a traditional senior apartment complex. The developer relies on consultants to provide them with information on what the current market needs are and what services will best fit their needs. The developer and the consultants are confident that there will be more than enough parking spaces provided. Board member Wise stated that the city needs to gather information on what industry standards are and needs need to be satisfied in these types of developments. Mr. Server stated that at the last planning commission meeting advised the city council to direct staff to start researching senior housing facilities to possibly write city ordinances that address these issues. TollaTerim � � � � � � ii-Ir • mm, mara Mr. Server stated there are of the 120 assisted and independent units, there is a 70% to 30% split. Chairperson Olson asked for clarification on the types of amenities available. Mr. Server stated that the amenities include a dining room, a lounge in each wing on each floor, TV lounge, chapel, a billiards room, a card room, a gift shop with basic items, a movie room, a salon and spa space, etc. Community Design Review Board 4 Minutes 06 -12 -2007 Chairperson Olson stated that other similar developments have been approved recently with similar parking ratios. She is comfortable with parking reduction. Chairperson Olson stated that the vinyl siding should be replaced with hardy board. Patrick Sarver, the landscape architect with Hartford Group, addressed the commission. Mr. Sarver went over the landscape plan. Chairperson Olson discussed the proposed locations of the rain gardens in comparison to the previous proposal. Mr. Sarver stated that the new proposal exceeds the rainwater garden requirements. Chairperson Olson asked if any utilities would be exposed on the exterior of the building. Mr. Sarver said there would not be any utilities exposed. Chairperson Olson questioned deliveries made to the proposed facility and where the truck access would be located. Mr. Sarver explained where the truck deliveries would be made. This are would accommodate moving trucks, delivery trucks, etc. There is also direct access to the freight elevator and the commercial kitchen area from this entrance. The board questioned what types of lighting fixtures are proposed and how the lighting will affect the surrounding homes. Mr. Sarver stated that the lighting fixtures are similar to the other developments in the Legacy Village area. Chairperson Olson motioned to approve the revised plans date - stamped J August 20, 2007 for the Regent at Legacy Village. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall revise the plans or do the following for staff approval: • Enter into a cross - easement agreement with the city for the shared parking spaces for the use of the city's abutting sculpture park. This agreement shall be prepared by the city attorney and shall require that the developer of the senior complex be responsible for driveway maintenance and snowplowing. This agreement shall be subject to the requirements of the director of public works. • Provide the city with cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the exterior landscaping and site improvements. • Meet all requirements of the engineering report by Jon Jarosch dated July 5, 2007. Community Design Review Board Minutes 06-12-2007 • Meet all requirements of the fire marshal and building official. • Provide engineered plans to the building official for all retaining walls that exceed four feet in height as measured from the bottom of the footing. All retaining walls that are four feet tall or taller shall have a protective fence or guardrail on top. • Provide a site and design plan for the screening of any trash and recycling containers if they would be kept outside. Should a trash enclosure area be proposed in the future, it shall not be placed in any parking space. • Provide a screening plan for any exterior utility meters, if there would be outside meters, subject to the requirements of the community design review board. • Provide sidewalks to the existing trails and public sidewalks as required by the original PUD approval. The location of these sidewalks is dependent upon the location of exits from the building. 3. Before getting a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall: • Comply with or complete all aspects of these plans or any required revisions. • Provide in-ground lawn irrigation as shown on the plans. • Install traffic and address signs, subject to staff approval. • Install wetland-protection buffer signs around the west side of the abutting wetland area. 4. The community design review board shall review major changes to these plans. Minor changes may be approved by staff. 5. The vinyl siding shall be substituted with Hardy Board cementitious siding. 6. The six Sculpture Park parking spaces shall be signed accordingly subject to staff approval. 0 . = 65 • F17 r4 Nill GM LTYLU M_ z • 07we we M Ayes — Demko, Olson, Wise 19 Ka n Rol KIM M"01=52 H Agenda Item L2 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Gladstone Streetscape Improvements, Phase 1, City Project 04-21, Resolution Requesting Cooperative Agreement Funding from MnDOT for TH 61 — Frost Avenue Improvements DATE: August 31, 2007 The proposed improvements for the first phase of the Gladstone redevelopment involve required traffic improvements to the intersection of TH 61 and Frost Avenue. MnDOT conducts a program whereby they provide local agencies funding to upgrade facilities on the trunk highway system. The program is called "Cooperative Agreement Funding". A resolution authorizing the staff to submit a funding request is required. BACKGROUND The attached resolution authorizes the staff to submit a Cooperative Agreement request and commits the City to construct the improvements if the Cooperative Agreement funds are received. MnDOT is currently programming funds for a signal upgrade, so we believe that funds are forthcoming. The current estimates for the improvement of the signal and turn lane improvements are estimated at $800,000. A breakdown of funding for the improvements is: • $150,000 - MnDOT signal funding • $ 50,000 — Ramsey County signal funding • $200,000 — MnDOT Cooperative Agreement funding • $400,000 — Maplewood Municipal State Aid Bond Funds - • $800,000 — Total Project Cost * - an alternative funding arrangement through the developer of The Shores at Lake Phalen is being explored to reduce the City's expense for this project. We are expecting to have full staff recommendations on the improvements available in early October 2007 for all Phase I improvements. �N• i� • ZI It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution requesting Cooperative Agreement Funding from MnDOT for the TH 61 — Frost Avenue Improvements. Attachment: 1. Resolution 2. Map of Phase I improvements CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION REQUESTING FUNDING FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THROUGH THE MUNICIPAL AGREEMENT PROGRAM FOR CITY PROJECT NO. 04-21 GLADSTONE AREA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRUNK HIGHWAY 61/FROST AVENUE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the AUAR for the Gladstone Area Redevelopment Master Plan identified mitigation strategies at the Trunk Highway 61 (T.H. 61)/Frost Avenue intersection including the extension of existing turn lanes and the addition of new turn lanes. WHEREAS, Mn/DOT is currently planning to replace the traffic signal at the intersection of T.H. 61/Frost Avenue with cost sharing from Ramsey County and the City of Maplewood. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood will be responsible for the funding of a portion of the traffic signal replacement at the intersection of T.H. 61/Frost Avenue. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is requesting financial participation for the traffic signal and turn lane improvements from the Minnesota Department of Transportation through the Municipal Agreement program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA THAT: 1. The City of Maplewood is hereby authorized to apply for Municipal Agreement Funding for City Project No. 04-21 — Gladstone Redevelopment Project T.H. 61/Frost Avenue Intersection Improvements. 2. The City of Maplewood is committed to complete this project if Municipal Agreement Funding is provided. Adopted by the City Council of Maplewood this 10 day of September 2007. AYES: NAYS: Diana Longrie, Mayor ATTEST: Greg Copeland, City Manager _ .......... ....nn.. ................. .n. v_v ° _x _._.... _. s._. — _ tF r �. w XL , ..... !N A} f � r x.. x ./v MAPLEW091Y DESIGNATION X :l" •. e sD CS.A D ES $A t1 _ ,. �.._... .._ ...m •___... ... . d _ _ C i ry of e - mirmeso �.s..rY��'`a. ��s°��epp��.�nn E f n )Wsi n imi # H r and Assmiates, Im I RIJ) T AVI ! I V RNBA K Agenda Item L3 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles /\h[ Public Works [)i[8CtOr/Ch« Engineer Michael Thompson, Civil Engineer 11 SUBJECT: Pond Overlook Public Improvements (2161 County Rd D),Pr 07-08 1' Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment ����������������K������ th ,2007 DATE: August 20. 2007 INTRODUCTION The bid opening for this project was held on1U:3UG.nn, Wednesday, August 22.20078t City Hall. The award Vf bid occurred on&U Vst27"',2O07. The resolution for ordering the preparation [f the assessment roll was adopted 0n July 23'".20U7. Since city staff now has a firm estimate of the total project SO3tforthia improvement, the city council should consider both accepting the attached assessment roll and ordering the assessment hearing. This is a developer driven project, 8ndaSSuCh.on|yth8d8v8|Vp8rpnJp8rtyis being considered for the full assessment. BACKGROUND The developer gained approval from the council for 8PUO. rezoning, and preliminary plat at the council meeting OD June 25th for the development site 8t2101 County Road [). Also On June 25"'opublic hearing was conducted regarding the extension of a public street and utilities to service the proposed d8Ye|Vprn8nL That n8sV|ULion was also passed. The c|h/ entered into 8 contract for construction of the public road and utilities Gt the August 27"'.2U07meeting. A letter 0f credit in the amount [f $329,000 was secured from the developer prior to awarding of the construction contract. This letter ofcredit will be retained by the city until the oSSeaSnnent i3 levied to the developer property at 2161 County Road B. Construction on the site has begun and the road and utility improvements are set k}Ue completed this year. The developer signed a developer agreement with the city to ensure certain conditions are met for the development site. The total project budget aa reported in the feasibility study was $2S3/427. The rev amount based upon the actual construction contract amount and all other project re|8tedCO3taCOnle3Outho183.Q55.52. The costs of all these public improvements are to be fully assessed to the developer property over a period of eight calendar years at 0.0Y6 interest. It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolutions for the Pond Overlook Public Improvements C2101 County Road [)\, Pro 07-08: Accepting Assessment Roll and (]nd8hng Assessment Hearing. Attachments 1. Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment Hearing o. Location Map 3. Assessment Roll RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the clerk and the city engineer have, 8t the direction 0f the council, prepared 8n 8sS8sSrn9nL n]U for the Pond [)v8d0ok Public |rnpnJv8n1Hnts C2181 County Road O\, City Project 07-08 and the said assessment roll iSon file inthe office of the city engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, 1. A hearing shall bR held OD the 8th day Of October 20O7.o1 the city hall 8t7:O0p`[n.t0pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause 8notice of the hearing Onthe proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices [0 the owners Vf all property affected bv said assessment. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the clerk and city engineer and that written Vr oral objections will beconsidered. EXHIBIT I iii Heijt�ts Park Playc rest Park 11 N POND OVERLOOK FINAL ASSESSMENT INFORMATION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT 07 -08 1 of 1 STREET PROPERTY PARCEL ID TAXPAYER STREET NUMBER ASSESSMENT 353022440011 ANDRUS INVESTMENTS INC. 2161 COUNTY ROAD D E $163,955.52 TOTALS= $163,955.52 1 of 1 Agenda Item L4 TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Pubic Works Director/City Engineer Erin Laberee, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Desoto Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06 16 1. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll for Doug Jones' Parking Bays and Sanitary Sewer Improvements 2. Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment Hearing for October 8th 2007 DATE: August 30, 2007 Doug Jones petitioned the city for the addition of parking bays and sanitary sewer along Mt. Vernon Avenue and Clark Street. Council approved a change order to add this work to the Desoto Skillman project on July 23 Mr. Jones has signed an assessment waiver for the cost of the work. The next step in the improvement process is to order the preparation of the assessment roll and then to approve the assessment roll. After the assessment roll is approved, an assessment hearing should be scheduled for October 81h 2007. Background As part of the Desoto Skillman Area Street Improvements, parking bays have been added along Mt. Vernon Avenue for the townhomes managed by Mr. Jones. A sanitary sewer extension was also added to the project at the request of Mr. Jones to provide gravity sewer to one of the townhomes along Clark Street. Mr. Jones has agreed to finance the cost of this work, which totals $19,265.13, and has signed an assessment waiver. An assessment roll has been prepared and is attached. The assessment roll identifies assessing the properties a total of $19,265.13. An assessment hearing should be scheduled for October 8 2007 at 7:00 pm. Budget Impact The recommended action will not affect the project budget. • � • It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolutions for the Desoto Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06-16, Ordering the Preparation of the Assessment Roll, and Accepting Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment Hearing. Attachments: 1. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll 2, Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment Hearing 3. Location Map 4. Assessment Roll RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION {JF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer will receive bids for the Desoto Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06-16. NOVVTHEREFORE.BE|TRESOLVEDBYTHEC|TYQOUNC|LOF MAPLEVVO{JD. MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece Or parcel of land abutting onthe streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARINI WHEREAS, the clerk and the city engineer have, at the direction of the council, prepared an assessment roll for the Desoto Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 00-16. and the said assessment roll isnn file in the office Vf the city engineer. NOVV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF K8APLEVV{J{]O, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall b8 held On the 8 day of October 2O07.EH the city hall 8t7:O0p.nn.tVpass upon such proposed assessment and 8t such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment t0be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices tV the owners [f all property affected by said assessment. The notice Of hearing shall state the date, time and place {f hearing, the general nature Ofthe improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the clerk and city engineer and that written 0r oral objections will b8considered. 0 0 < L < Cn n C u� — Cn ry n rr" Cn n 7]ELD RIDGE D AV E. (J Cn z Oehrline U) < BELMONT LN. Lake Cn 0 1 Cf) C SKILLMAN AVE. SKILL MV L. DLL LVVUUU E. LLJ SUMMER ry PT Western Hills Cf) D F n 0 r U < UIVIIVIE-r LIN. L_J Lu D M ry RIPLE 71 Cn D AVE. AV E. Cn _ E F - RM n CL F_ z y 0 0 c :2 < Li I (-D 0 ry < (Y CD ry w 1_: m RIPLEY AVE. G� CD D n I 7 W < MT VERNON M AVE. Cf) LLJ J 0 < 0 I OENJES T J� Roselawn Edgerton Park As LIJ I'l ry � 1 0 Cn I I - I Cn Cn Pa rk PL ZZ P a AVE. n A S O AVE BELLWO(I MV L. DLL LVVUUU E. LLJ SUMMER ry PT Western Hills Cf) D F n 0 r U < UIVIIVIE-r LIN. L_J Lu D M ry RIPLE 71 Cn D AVE. >_ V (n I P--: u� LLJ RIPLEY AVE. G� CD < ry M Cn > K I N GSTO N < AVE. 0 ry 3: :�i V cf) PRICE L � 7 ' j A rim Cn I I - I AVE. D n 7 35E 1 \5� Proposed Capital Improvement Plan for 2007 Desoto-Skillman Area Street Improvements City Project 06-16 0 08 -30 -07 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DESOTO SKILLMAN AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT 06 -16 ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PARKING BAYS AND SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION Lot PIN Parking Bays Sanitary Total 2019 Desoto 172922230001 $ 858.00 $ 858.00 2007 Desoto 172922230002 $ 858.00 $ 858.00 1993 Desoto 172922230003 $ 858.00 $ 858.00 1997 Desoto 172922230093 $ 858.00 $ 858.00 1994 Clark 172922230006 $ 858.00 $ 858.00 2008 Clark 172922230007 $ 858.00 $ 858.00 2020 Clark 172922230008 $ 858.00 $ 858.00 2025 Clark 172922230009 $ 858.00 $ 858.00 2011 Clark 172922230010 $ 858.00 $ 858.00 1999 Clark 172922230011 $ 858.00 $ 858.00 1985 Clark 1172922230012 1 $ 858.00 1 $ 9,827.13 $ 10,685.13 TOTAL 1 $ 9,437.98 1 $ 9,827.13 $ 19,265.13 AGENDA NO. L -5 TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Robert Mittet, Finance & Administration Manager RE: Preliminary Approval of Proposed Tax Levy Payable in 2008 DATE: September 6, 2007 State law requires that cities certify their proposed property tax levies to the county auditor by September 15. The proposed tax levy that is given preliminary approval cannot be increased. Therefore, it is important that the proposed tax levy provides adequate revenues to finance the 2008 Budget. On May 8, 2006, the City Council directed staff to use the then current, 2006, rate of property tax levy for the planning target for the 2007 budget. Staff has continued to follow this Council direction in preparation of the 2008 budget. The 2008 proposed levy is based on the 2006 levy rate applied to the current taxable values. An historical analysis of the city's tax base from 2004 — 2008 is attached. Based on values developed by the Ramsey County Assessor, it indicates a 3.2% increase in total taxable value between 2007 and 2008, down from a 12.0% increase for the previous period between 2006 and 2007. The proposed tax levy then is $16,112,725, an increase of 3.6% from the 2007 levy. The City Council needs to decide the maximum levy that it is willing to approve and then adopt the attached resolution. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TAX BASE 2004 -2008 Sub -Total 35,744,863 38,904,061 43,251,535 48,720,722 50,503,081 Fiscal Disparities: 2008 TAXABLE VALUE: 2004 2005 2006 2007 ESTIMATE Real Estate 35,725,410 38,947,265 43,322,776 48,753,765 50,555,758 Personal Property 414,893 429,727 436,597 463,173 463,104 Tax Increment Districts (395,440) (472,931) (507,838) (496,216) (515,781) Sub -Total 35,744,863 38,904,061 43,251,535 48,720,722 50,503,081 Fiscal Disparities: Contribution (4,902,306) (5,239,396) (5,247,843) (6,002,384) (7,013,611) Distribution 3,269,704 3,370,550 3,522,442 3,801,563 4,535,739 Net Contribution (1,632,602) (1,868,846) (1,725,401) (2,200,821) (2,477,872) Total Taxable Value 34,112,261 37,035,215 41,526,134 46,519,901 48,025,209 Percent Change 10.5% 8.6% 12.1% 12.0% 3.2% Operations: Operations Total Capital Improvements: Capital Improvements Total Debt Service: Debt Service Fund Totals -All Funds TAX LEVY FOR 20072008 Proposed 2006 2007 2008 Levy Levy eLevy $11,089,570 $12,405,650 $12,690,800 $0 $0 $3,016,800 $3,140,800 $0 $3,421,925 $14,106,370 $15,546,450 $16,112,725 Change Amount Percent $285,150 2.3% $0 NIA $281,125 9.0% $566,275 3.6% P: IBUDGETIBUDMISC12008108taxest01 9/6/2007 RESOLUTION PROVIDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 2007 WHEREAS, State law requires that the City Council give preliminary approval of a proposed tax levy for 2007 payable in 2008 by September 15, 2007 and WHEREAS, he City Council has reviewed the Proposed 2008 Budget and has determined the amount of the proposed tax levy payable in 2008 which is the maximum amount that will be levied. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA THAT the proposed tax levy for 2007 payable in 2008 in the amount of $16,112,725 is hereby given preliminary approval. AGENDA NO. L-6 mmz�� FROM: Robert Mittet, Finance & Administration Manager Public Hearing Dates • Proposed 2008 Budget and Property Tax Levy ma State law requires that the City hold a public hearing on its budget and property tax levy for 2008. The following procedures must be followed: • Certify to Ramsey County the date it has selected by September 15 th; • Hold the meeting between November 29 and December 201h; • Hold the hearing after 5:00 p.m. if it is on a day between Monday and Friday or at any reasonable time on Saturday; and • Not to conflict with hearings for the county, metro special taxing districts or the three school districts in Maplewood. It bears noting that under statutes, since our property tax levy does not exceed the previous year levy by more than 4.2853%, the implicit price deflator, the city is exempt from the requirement to hold a Truth in Taxation hearing. Recommendation 71 10, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. ' S'rn - F'YrF - dT - ff T - 1 L feF6K'eT1TTX"1f , it! tv it. P\Council Files\Agendas\2008budgethearing S\AG EN DA \2007budgethearing FWATC1001197 1 USMINML�� I I I III I I 111�11 I Still =101J,111111110111 IF! �1111 .-- WA3411111TIFTIFFF med LTA= RE: Resolution Providing for the Competitive Negotiated Sale of $5,090,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 20078 DATE: September 10, 2007 Bonds need to be issued to finance five public works improvement projects that the City Council has approved. Improvement bonds totaling $5,090,000 are planned for the projects that have special assessments that total at least 20% of the project costs. The projects and financing plans are listed in the attached report from Springsted Incorporated. The report lists annual tax levies for the improvement bonds of $241,182-$2608,717 payable 2009-2022 which are required to finance the unassessed project costs. The report also suggests a bid award on the bond sale at the Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, September 24, 2007. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution providing preliminary approval for the sale of $5,090,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds. I W W A V 01% ITIN 1,101 ON I EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA HELD: September 10, 2007 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on September 10, 2007, at 10:30 o'clock A.M. for the purpose in part of authorizing the competitive negotiated sale of the $5,090,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007B. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATED SALE OF $5,090,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2007B A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City"), has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue $5,090,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007B (the "Bonds"), to finance various improvement projects within the City; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Springsted Incorporated, in Saint Paul, Minnesota ("Springsted"), as its independent financial advisor and is therefore authorized to sell these obligations by a competitive negotiated sale in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 47�5.60, Subdivision 2(9); and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: I. Authorization. The City Council hereby authorizes Springsted to solicit proposals for the competitive negotiated sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting Proposal Opening. This City Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Terms of Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A for the purpose of considering proposals for, and awarding the sale of, the Bonds. The proposals shall be received at the offices of Springsted and shall be opened at the time specified in such Terms of Proposal. 3. Terms of Proposal. The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the negotiation thereof are fully set forth in the "Terms of Proposal" attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby approved and made a part hereof. 4. Official Statement. In connection with the sale, the City Clerk, Mayor and other officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Springsted and 2071839NA participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds, and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 2071839N1 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the City's $5,090,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007B. WITNESS my hand on September 10, 2007. City Clerk 2071839N1 3 EXHIBIT A THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $5,090,000 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2007B (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, September 24, 2007, until 10:30 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless of the manner in which the Proposal is submitted. (a) Sealed Bidding. Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223-3046 to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223-3000 or fax (651) 223-3046 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. M (b) Electronic Bidding, Notice is hereby given that electronic proposals will be received via 7- PARITY . For purposes of the electronic bidding process, the time as maintained by PARITY shall constitute the official time with respect to all Bids submitted to PARITY. Each bidder shall be solely responsible for making necessary arrangements to access PARITY for purposes (?I'submitting its electronic Bid in a timely manner and in compliance with the requirements of the Terms of* Proposal. Neither the City, its agents nor PARITY shall have any duty or obligation to undertake registration to bid for any prospective bidder or to provide or ensure electronic access to any qualified prospective bidder, and neither the City, its agents nor PARITY shall be responsible for a bidder's failure to register to bid or for any failure in the proper operation of, or have any liability for any delays or interruptions of or any damages . Preliminary; subject to change. -1- caused by the services of PARITY . The City is using the services of PARITY solely as a communication mechanism to conduct the electronic bidding for the Bonds, and PARITY is not an agent of the City. If any provisions of this Terms of Proposal conflict with information provided by PARITY, this Terms of Proposal shall control. Further information about PARITY including any fee charged, may be obtained from: PARITY, , 1359 Broadway, 2 nd Floor, New York, New York 10018 Customer Support: (212) 849-5000 DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated October 15, 2007, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February I and August I of each year, commencing August 1, 2008. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months. The Bonds will mature February I in the years and amounts* as follows: 2009 $125,000 2013 $360,000 2017 $340,000 2021 $380,000 2010 $330,000 2014 $330,000 2018 $350,000 2022 $395,000 2011 $340,000 2015 $330,000 2019 $355,000 2023 $405,000 2012 $350,000 2016 $335,000 2020 $365,000 The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the principal amount of'the Bonds offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. In the event the principal amount oJ'the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any discount taken by the sueeessful bidder will he increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the principal amount of'the Bonds is increased or reduced. Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial bonds and term bonds. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above. In order to designate term bonds, the proposal must specify "Years of Tenn Maturities" in the spaces provided on the Proposal Form. BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the Bonds with DTC. -u- REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar, which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The City may elect on February 1, 2018, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2019. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition, the City will pledge special assessments against benefited properties. The proceeds will be used to finance various improvement projects within the City. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not less than $5,036,555 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $50,900, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany the proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The Deposit received from the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement, will be deposited by the City and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser falls to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 51100 or 1/8 of I%. There is no limit on the interest rate spread if quoted in level or ascending order; however, no rate for any maturity shall be more than 1.0% lower than any prior rate. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. - iii - n 1 =1 1 11 The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non-substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and (iii) reject any proposal that the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds that shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Unless compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds has been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE On the date of actual issuance and delivery of the Bonds, the City will execute and deliver a Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (the "Undertaking") whereunder the City will covenant for the benefit of the owners of the Bonds to provide certain financial and other information about -iv- the City and notices of certain occurrences to information repositories as specified in and required by SEC Rule 15c2-12(b)(5). OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223-3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 200 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Dated September 10, 2007 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Karen Guilfbile City Clerk -v- nri nq ed September 6, 2007 Mr. Robert Mittet Finance & Administrative Manager City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109-2797 Springsted Incorporated 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300 Saint Paul, IVIN 55101-2887 Tel: 651-223-3000 Fax: 651-223-3002 www.springsted.com Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of $5,090,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 20078 Dear Mr. Mittet: We have enclosed an electronic copy of our recommendations for the above-captioned issue for distribution to Council members and City staff prior to your meeting on Monday, September 10, 2007, We have also enclosed under separate cover contract amendment for services relating to arbitrage /rebate to include this issue. If the City wishes to continue to engage Springsted for this service for the new issue, please sign the amendment and return it to us. If you should have any questions pertaining to the enclosed documents, or if you require additional copies, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, 4. . Christine M. Hogan Project Manager smC Enclosures Recommendations M $5 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007E *Preliminary; subject to change Presented to: Honorable Diana Longrie, Mayor Members, City Council Mr. Greg Copeland, City Manager Mr. Robert Mittet, Finance and Administrative Manager City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797 Study No.: M1408V2 SPRINGSTED Incorporated September 6, 2007 Sprincjsted RECOMMENDATIONS Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of $5,090,000* General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007B (the "Bonds" or "Issue") We respectfully request your consideration of our recommendations for the above-named Issue. Bond proceeds will be used to finance various street improvement projects within the City. We recommend the following for the Bonds: 2. 3. 0 5. I Action Requested To establish the date and time of receiving bids and establish the terms and conditions of the offering. Sale Date and Time Monday, September 24, 2007 at 10:30 A.M., with consideration for award by the City Council at 7:00 P.M. that same day. Method of Sale The Bonds will be sold through a competitive bidding process. In the interest of obtaining as many bids as possible, we have included a provision in the attached Terms of Proposal for underwriters to submit their bid electronically through the electronic bidding platform of PARITV In addition, physical bids (by phone or fax) will be accepted at the offices of Springsted. Authority for the Bonds The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475 and 429. Principal Amount of the Bonds R 1.1 111 *Included in the Terms of Proposal for the Bonds is a provision that permits the City to increase or reduce the principal amount of the Bonds in any of the maturities. This allows for any necessary adjustments required based on final interest rates and issuance costs. Repayment Term The Bonds will mature annually February 1, 2009 through 2023. Interest will be payable each February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 2008, 7. Security, Source of Payment and Payment Cycle (a) Security *Preliminary; subject to change The Bonds are general obligations of the City secured by its full faith and credit and taxing power. City of Maplewood, Minnesota September 6, 2007 (b) Payment Source Special assessments and ad valorem property taxes are pledged as a repayment source for the Bonds. In addition, the City expects to use sanitary sewer funds, environmental utility funds and MSA funds for payment of debt service. (q) Payment Cycle The City will make their first levy in 2008 for collection in 2009. Special assessments are expected to be filed on or about October 15, 2007. Since taxes will not be available until 2009 and special assessments alone are not sufficient to make the full interest payments due on the Bonds, capitalized interest has been included in the par amount of the Bonds to pay a portion of the interest payments due through February 1, 2009. For the first levy year (the August 1, 2008 interest payment and the February 1, 2009 principal and interest payment), capitalized interest along with assessment income will be used to make those debt service payments. Thereafter, each year's collections of taxes and assessments will be used to make the August 1 interest payment in the collection year and the February 1 principal and interest payment in the following year. 8. Prepayment Provisions The City may elect on February 1, 2018, and on any date thereafter, to prepay the Bonds due on or after February 1, 2019 at a price of par plus accrued interest. 9. Term Bonds We have included a provision for the Bonds that permits the underwriters to combine multiple maturity years into a term bond, subject to mandatory redemption on the same maturity schedule provided in the Terms of Proposal. The advantage to the underwriter is that it provides large blocks of bonds, which are more attractive to bond funds, and certain pension funds, which deal only with large blocks of bonds. This in turn is a benefit to the City since selling larger blocks of bonds reduces the risk to the underwriter, allowing them to lower their costs and the interest coupons. Since the Bonds are being offered on a competitive bid basis and awarded on the lowest ME City of Maplewood, K1innes0ta September 6, 2007 true interest Cost, the City will award the Bonds to the best bid regardless Vf whether term bonds are chosen or not. 10. Credit Rating Comments AO application will b8 made k)Muudx'sInvestors Service for 8 rating 0O the Bonds. The City's outstanding general obligation debt i8 currently rated 11. Federal Tax' Exempt Obligations () Bank Qualification Under Federal Tax Law, financial institutions cannot deduct from income for federal iDCVme tax purposes, expense that iS allocable tO carrying and acquiring tax- exempt bOOdS. There iSGn exemption tO this for "bank qualified" bonds, which can be8o designated ifthe issuer does not issue more than $1O million nftax exempt obligations inG calendar year. Issues that are bank qualified generally receive slightly lower interest rates than issues that are not bank qualified. Since the City has issued more than $10 million Uf tax- exempt bODdSiO2O07 designated 8S bank qualified. 0d Rebate Requirements All tax-exempt issues are subject t0the federal arbitrage and rebate requirements, which require all excess earnings created b» the financing k}b8rebated k) the U.8. Treasury. The requirements generally cover two categories: bond proceeds and debt service funds. There are exemptions from rebate that may apply in both U[ these categories. There are exemptions to rebate if the proceeds of the Bonds are spent kl accordance wi#lOO8Of8l8 applicable expenditure exemptions. Proceeds used for construction purposes may qualify for the 0-00Dth.18- month, or 24-month expenditure exceptions. Kis our understanding that the City expects hJspend the proceeds 0f the Bonds within 18'0ODthS and will therefore b8 exempt from rebate. Please note that although the City expects k)meet an expenditure exception, the expenditure exceptions are based 0O actual expenditures and not one Ofexpectations. 8phOgGted currently provides arbitrage and rebate zz City of Maplewood, Minnesota September 6, 2007 services to the City. A contract amendment adding the Bonds has been forwarded to City staff. (c) Bona Fide Debt Service Fund The City must maintain a bona fide debt service fund for the Bonds or be subject to yield restriction. This requires restricting the investments held in the debt service fund to the yield on the Bonds. A bona fide debt service fund is a fund for which there is an equal matching of revenue to debt service expense, with carry over permitted equal to the greater of the investment earnings in the fund for the prior year or 1112 the debt service of the prior year. Additional diligence should be exercised in monitoring the debt service fund for the Bonds due to the potential accumulation of assessment prepayments, which could cause the debt service fund on the Bonds to become non-bona fide. (d) Economic Life The average life of the Bonds cannot exceed 120% of the economic life of the projects to be financed. (e) Federal Reimbursement Regulations 12. Continuing Disclosure The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance street improvements which have an economic life of at least 20 years. The average life of the Bonds is 8.551 years. Therefore the Bonds are within the economic life requirements. Federal reimbursement regulations require the City to make a declaration, within 60 days of the actual payment, of its intent to reimburse itself from expenses paid prior to the receipt of Issue proceeds. It is our understanding the City has taken whatever actions are necessary to comply with the federal reimbursement regulations in regards to the Bonds. The Bonds are subject to continuing disclosure requirements set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC rules require the City to undertake an annual update of certain Official Statement information and report any material events to the national repositories. In the past, the City has indicated that it will manage its own continuing disclosure matters. We understand that the City will continue that practice with this Issue. Em City of Maplewood, Minnesota September 6, 2007 13. Attachments • Sources and Uses • Assessment Income Schedules • Debt Service Schedules • Terms of Proposal DISCUSSION Proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance the following five projects: (i) Ferndale Geranium Area, (ii) Lark Prosperity Area, (iii) Pond-Overlook, (iv) DeSoto Area and; (v) Brookview Drive Area, All five projects are street reconstruction projects and related improvements including subgrade correction, concrete curb and gutter installation, storm sewer improvements, sanitary sewer improvements and watermain improvements. A large portion of the DeSota Area and Brookview Drive Area projects were previously bonded for with the issuance of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007A (the "Series 2007A Bonds"). A detailed sources and uses for the Bonds broken out by project is shown on page 7. The sources and uses include project costs, capitalized interest, costs of issuance and underwriter's discount. Special assessments and ad valorem property taxes are pledged as a repayment source for the Bonds. Assessments for Ferndale Geranium Area, Lark Prosperity Area and Pond Overlook in the principal amount of $1,487,650 will be filed on or about October 15, 2007. Assessments for the DeSota Area and Brookview Drive Area projects were applied to the Series 2007A Bonds. The assessments are structured over a term of 15 years with equal annual principal payments with interest charged on the unpaid balance of assessments of 6.0%. The total projected assessment schedule is shown on page 8. Pages 9 through 11 show the assessment schedules by project. Based on projected assessment income the City will be required to levy ad valorem taxes to pay a portion of the debt service on the Bonds. The City will make its first levy for the Bonds in 2008 for collection in 2009. Since taxes will not be available until 2009 and special assessments alone are not sufficient to make the full interest payments due on the Bonds, capitalized interest has been included in the par amount of the Bonds to pay a portion of the interest payments due through February 1, 2009. For the first levy year (the August 1, 2008 interest payment and the February 1, 2009 principal and interest payment), capitalized interest along with assessment income will be used to make those debt service payments. Thereafter, each year's collections of taxes and assessments will be used to make the August 1 interest payment in the collection year and the February 1 principal and interest payment in the following year. Each year's collection of assessments and taxes will be used to make the August 1 interest payment due in the collection year and the February 1 principal and interest payment due in the following year. In addition to assessment income and tax levies, the City expects to pay a portion of the debt service on the Ferndale Geranium Area project and Lark Prosperity Area project from the City's Sanitary Sewer Fund and Environmental Utility Fund. WAS funds in the total amount of $255,600, applied in equal annual installments over five years, will be used to pay a portion of the debt service on the Ferndale Geranium Area project. The Bonds have been structured over a term of 15 years around the projected assessments and other sources as identified above to provide a level annual tax levy requirement. Debt service schedules for each project are shown on Em City of Maplewood, Minnesota September 6, 2007 pages 12 -16. The debt service schedule for the Bonds as a whole is shown on page 17. Page 17 shows the following information: • Columns 1 through 4 show the annual principal payments, estimated interest rates and projected total principal and interest payments, given the current market environment. • Column 5 shows the amount of capitalized interest included in the par amount of the Bonds and that will be used to pay a portion of the interest due through February 1, 2009. • Column 6 shows the net new debt service. Column 7 shows the 5% overlevy which is required by State statutes and serves as a protection to bondholders and the City in the event of delinquencies in the collection of assessments or taxes. • Column 8 shows the projected assessment income developed on pages 8 through 10. • Column 9 shows the actual levy the City will need to certify. • Column 10 shows the projected debt service expected to be paid for from the City's Sanitary Sewer Fund. • Column 11 shows the projected debt service expected to be paid for from the City's Environmental Utility Fund. • Column 12 shows the projected debt service expected to be paid for from WAS funds. • Column 13 shows the net projected tax levy requirement for the Bonds, which represents the difference between the legal levy required (column 9) and the contributions from the sanitary sewer fund, environmental utility fund and MSAS funds (columns 10,11 and 12). Springsted Incorporated is pleased to again be of service to the City of Maplewood. Respectfully submitted, SPRINGSTED Incorporated N Provided to Staff: Rebate Contract Amendment Om 0 0 m 6 cn U) a) 0 co 0 0 W > 0 C"L m 0 0 0 a) (D ■ ■ ■ (Dal 0 0 OM007 0 = q q qa�qq q U) m 0 0 . U') W Ln 't 0 2 E 0 0 to N LO 0 E C� Ci (q C\� cl� Ct 0 0 0 C\l (D cn I�t (N 0 co 0) q CY) R C*lj t- LO Cn 0) G� C� 0 m V) W) Ln 0 2) 613, 61) to 3: m 0 a Cl co a 0 0 (D C� R C� — q I' R q 0 0 0 CD (D Ln -t — 0 R a 0 C, Cl) (D I- cli 0 0 L: 0 C� C� CS Ci C\! C CO Iq Ct CO 1- — & 0 0 Cl) m m Cl) LO V7 44 4a 0 m 0 0 c) cl C) 0 ;:�- 0 0 2) q R - q C� cx� Z6 R U) < 0 CD c, -�T C) -T 6 0 0 c c 0 C) C) co C) v C*4 0 Cl) 0 0 (s �r — 0 ai 04- - 0 0 00 0 N 6e tF.� 4a 0 0 C C� m r- 0 0 R q U � O � U � q 0 0 CD (D C m m 0 IL S a C) It �� �; 0 S Cy i C\ � - Ct > w Cl — — — 0 co a = LO LL 0 a C) p a 0 42 q -� q L q I C R < 0 CD C, 04 M 0 § CL 0 0 0 0 — r" " 0 a) 00 — C� vi wi ai 06 — 0 a. oc� co tl- co 2/ 04 oll ci 4% cli Cq to m N., E m 0 0 0 = P q q 0 98 a C LO N a) E R 0 R C) 'qt (D M V) 0 " q - L ( Q V ! C� 0 0 co OD CO Cl) 0 U- co r-_ m Cl) LO V7 64 LL 70 a = LO LL 0 2/ \ 4 t4 = Y) 0 U- CL -r 0 Co 0 FO E U . a- o 0 0 < ! — .2 2 - - 0) 0 tz! te —0 < cl) 0 En to 0 0 CL CL 0 0 (D (D 0 0 0 Cl) (L F- 0 01-- 0 X m N., City rfMaplewood, Minn General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Ser 2007B Total Assessment Income ASSESSMENT INCOME Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 12/31/2008 99,177.00 6.000% 108,102.57 207,279.57 12/31/2009 99,177.00 6.000% 83,308.38 182,485.38 12/31/2010 99,177.00 6.000% 77,357.76 176,534.76 12/31/2011 99,177.00 6.000% 71,407.14 170,584.14 12/31/2012 99,177.00 6.000% 65,456.52 164,633.52 12/31/2013 99,177.00 6.000% 59,505.90 158,682.90 12/31/2014 99,177.00 6.000% 53,555.28 152,732.28 12/31/2015 99,177.00 6,000% 47,604.66 146,781.66 12/31/2016 99,177,00 6.000% 41,654.04 140,831.04 12/31/2017 99,177.00 6,000% 35,703.42 134,880.42 12/31/2018 99,176,00 6,000% 29,752.80 128,928.80 12/31/2019 99,176.00 6,000% 23,802.24 122,978.24 12/31/2020 99,176,00 6.000% 17,851.68 117,027.68 12/31/2021 99,176.00 6,000% 11,901.12 111,077.12 12/31/2022 99,176,00 6,000% 5,950.56 105,126.56 Total $1,487,650.00 - $732,914.07 $2,220,564.071 SIGNIFICANT DATES Filing ............ -............. ---........ ---........ ---............. —............. --........ --............. -....... 10/15/2887 FiraPoymnmDate .---------------------------------------------------. 1281/2808 v=iesx007fl^=="~"m/ls" Summa / /-Z-2uox ���pri��s��� ��| �, ~ � ��� Em City mJMaplewood, K General Ob Improvement Bonds, Series 2D07B Ferndale Geranium Area Assessments ASSESSMENT INCOME Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+1 12/31/2008 34,316.00 6.000% 37,404.44 71,720.44 12/31/2009 34,316.00 6.000% 28,825.44 63,141.44 12/3112010 34,316.00 6.000% 26,766.48 61,082.48 12/31/2011 34,316.00 6.000% 24,707.52 59,023.52 12/31/2012 34,316.00 6.000% 22,648.56 56,964.56 12/31/2013 34,316.00 6.000% 20,589.60 54,905.60 12/31/2014 34,316.00 6.000% 18,530.64 52,846.64 12/31/2015 34,316.00 6.000% 16,471,68 50,787,68 12/31/2016 34,316.00 6.000% 14,412.72 48,728,72 12/31/2017 34,316.00 6.000% 12,353,76 46,669.76 12/31/2018 34,316.00 6.000% 10,294.80 44,610.80 12/31/2019 34,316.00 6.000% 8,235.84 42,551.84 12/31/2020 34,316.00 6.000% 6,176.88 40,492.88 12/3112021 34,316.00 6.000% 4,117.92 38,433.92 12/31/2022 34,316.00 6.000% 2,058.96 36,374.96 Total $514,740.00 - S253,595.24 $768,335.24 SIGNIFICANT DATES Filing Date. .... -------......... ......................... ------------------------....................... 10;5/2007 r n c, 4 :���� Em 792,91 0 City nfMaplewood, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2OU7B Lark Prosperity Area Assessments ASSESSMENT INCOME Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+l 12/31/2008 52,861.00 6.000% 57,618.13 110,479.13 12/31/2009 52,861.00 6.000% 44,402.94 97,263.94 12/31/2010 52,861.00 6.000% 41,231.28 94,092.28 12/31/2011 52,861.00 6.000% 38,059.62 90,920.62 12/31/2012 52,861.00 6.000% 34,88796 87,748.96 12/31/2013 52,861.00 6.000% 31,716.30 84,577.30 12/31/2014 52,861.00 6.000% 28,544.64 81,405.64 12/31/2015 52,861.00 6.000% 25,372M 78,233.98 12/31/2016 52,861.00 6.000% 22,201.32 75,062.32 12/31/2017 52,861.00 6.000% 19,029.66 71,890.66 12/31/2018 52,860.00 6.000% 15,858.00 68,718.00 12/31/2019 52,860.00 6.000% 12,686.40 65,546.40 12/31/2020 52,860.00 6.000% 9,514.80 62,374.80 12/31/2021 52,860.00 6.000% 6,343.20 59,203.20 12/31/2022 52,860.00 6.000% 3,171.60 56,031.60 Total $792,910.00 - $390,638M $1,183,548.831 SIGNIFICANT DATES Filing Date .-------------------------------------------------------. 10M5/2007 m,ics20m7W^==mun*/ Lark n"p,* S p gr i n g st e d $180,000 City of Maplewood, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007B Pond Overlook Assessments ASSESSMENT INCOME Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 12/31/2007 - - - 1213112008 12,000.00 6.000% 13,080.00 25,080.00 1213112009 12,000.00 6.000% 10,080.00 22,080.00 1213112010 12,000.00 6.000% 9,360.00 21,360.00 12/31/2011 12,000.00 6.000% 8,640.00 20,640.00 1213112012 12,000.00 6.000% 7,920.00 19,920.00 1213112013 12,000.00 6.000% 7,200.00 19,200.00 1213112014 12,000.00 6.000% 6,480.00 18,480.00 1213112015 12,000.00 6.000% 5,760.00 17,760.00 1213112016 12,000.00 6.000% 5,040.00 17,040.00 1213112017 12,000.00 6.000% 4,320.00 16,320.00 1213112018 12,000.00 6.000% 3,600.00 15,600.00 1213112019 12,000.00 6.000% 2,880.00 14,880.00 1213112020 12,000.00 6.000% 2,160.00 14,160.00 1213112021 12,000.00 6.000% 1,440.00 13,440.00 1213112022 12,000.00 6.000% 720.00 12,720.00 Total $180,000.00 - $88,680.00 $268,680.001 SIGNIFICANT DATES FilingDate ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1011512007 FirstPayment Date ................. .......................... -.— .... .......................... .......................... -.— .... .......................... — 1213112008 Aeries 2007J?Assc-m,nts / Pnd0,vr1—kAscssm,n& / 812312007 / 1 a28PYIJ D, ingsted Page 11 C) C) CN C13 0 (n U) (n co 70 a) r — o < E 0 O 0 E a) ti > (D (D 2 CL 0 ui LU LU LU co LU ui Z I It V q w w co - w " w j ,�r �r �r �t 10 Lr) LO to to 1- co co 00 0) m (N i :: - O 00 U I-- I-- m I-- w m ti E E N cq CO Lq N M N cc! r M O 10 to 0 N ul C i p c) m m u-) Lo c (D oo N w 1-- CD N c�2 "t cD m C4 cll� IS- cl) " cq Ili c cq lr� G� - u? tq V r c� LL cN I-- Nf oo CD 'It cD Vt co m O (D Qo CL J ul ") Lo u7 tn lo lo lo u") to o) r- 15 O l o m N " [-- c " t [- [-- ( D — cD q V) Z It C) Cl) 0) P- C 0) u1 M Ul 00 IT C'4 ,4 cD C) CD bb C) OR m V c � C ! C! O O a 0 cD c) C) C) LL 00 mmmmmmmmmcy) G lo lo lo In Lo Lo ttY I) 0 cD 0 C, 0 C C) C) m C) O 04 O C) to C) V C) c) c N N co Nr ID cN m cq r q: V: m M q N r r ( N cl) 1) z� 43 z cl) - IT cl) ( Vt 't cl) It Vt -It co c1l oo LL. CO CO C =i C:i c:� a� O C! c� c� O ai 0 ci W C=! clj N N N 04 N clj clj c1l 04 clj 04 clj cl4 C> Eh I It V q w w co - w " w j ,�r �r �r �t 10 Lr) LO to to 1- co co 00 0) m (N m r cD w V co 00 CD C'4 CN 'T cg O c, CD CO Co m Ci U) M (Iq 11 Ci pl% O m r h <0 m ti E E m m m m m w m m I-- w m 00 10 to 0 N ul I�r -;r �r It It IT IT 'r -It IT �r llr� Iq Iq U� IQ IQ Iq llr� W� Ili C4 cll� IS- — — — — — — — — — — — — 1- V) LL — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — co Co co Ln u) to Lo Ln tn Lo m cl) cD C) � O l o m N " [-- c " t [- [-- ( D — cD q q V It C) Cl) 0) P- C 0) u1 M Ul 00 IT C'4 i CD q: m P. cq r O U) O m m pl- " O q Co f- ��! cli It f- LO co C:. LO OR m " V- �: w 10 O m m a to p- rl-� C "r La 00 mmmmmmmmmcy) G cD cD =1 C) 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 cD -- I) 0 cD 0 C, 0 C C) C) m C) O Lo I It V q w w co - w " w j ,�r �r �r �t 10 Lr) LO to to 1- co co 00 0) m (N �v (D o " m r — w t— 'm o " c) v oo clj (o C> -t m N co m m [-- Lo m E E R O O m m co r-- r-- cq u) v: cy� m to 0 N ul cl) Z; (m �o m �o 04 m In Ir t Iq Ir (1) m oo (D 4) N 14 u1 CD 1- V) co Co co Ln u) to Lo Ln tn Lo m cl) cD C) (D O l o m N " [-- c " t [- [-- ( D — cD q q YO M Co to to co N Lo in " f-• (o C) cl) m (D Lo M (D m m r- N cD m " [-- c%j I- " m r ( q O cq l c 13 i vi cl! M F tl-� u7 11-i m C) u') � " [-- r- r- [-- M .4 — La N C CV CCD N j i F, CCD O C C C) O O CD CD CD O O C) C, CD cD cD =1 C) 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 cD c> I) 0 cD 0 C, 0 C C) C) m C) O Lo O r- r-- cm N c) O CN u1 C-4 M M C%l " r' f C-4 (Q CO r v: C� c? c� l l� cci M u ( Q z� 43 z m m m m r-- m �r c� If) �2 m �2 m 71 V V �2 �2 V co c1l oo Z cN cN N c6 cd co cD c:. O c:- =1 cD c:. b c3 =1 b c:. cD cD lo m Lo 0 cD C cD cD cD cD cD cD cD m oo r- t- cD c� m cNI (N (N 0 0 m o N CO CO cj a� CO f c � Co c\! <=� r vi co - m ol m m r- m m ;r cD cD O �2 �2 m �2 Z! �r �2 �2 �2 �2 �2 �2 M 12 N 613 to C) C, C, cD cD cD cD cD cD C> O cl cD (D O m m u C c) 0 0 0 0 0 C! u C� O m oo I-- I- Lo U') Lo Lo N N c) c) OJ m " " " O c:. m w " oR Co tll� O c cl! O 111-i v oc� r N M L O m (D to Lo -41 co co m O CH 0 Cl b c) O O O c) c) In O Lo O M M M O CD r N 04 M ',t 1) u1 10 CO 0 U m m cl) �v (D =1 CD C:. O CD O b C:l CD CD =1 CD C:. CD CD C> CD =1 O Cl CI C) C C C) C) C) C> CD Cl Cl O CCI C:l CD CD CD CD =1 CD O C) CD =1 CD CD CD Cl O C) Cl CD CD =1 =. CD Cl Cl CD C) CD C:, CD C=) C:> O cz� O O O O C� Ci Ci Ci C! C� (=� O O O V u1 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD C) C) C) C) C) C� CD Cl C) (V 4 1 1 4 N N C14 04 0 N C CV CCD N j i F, CCD O C C C) O O CD CD CD O O C) C, CD �v (D C) C) C'4 ❑ ca 6 (1) U) (D (6 - C m 0 < -0 a) 0 E 0 (1) 0- 3 > to N 0 0 - a ❑ 0- E 0 O (o 2) Z 0 W W cn W 2 W cn W W Z (D M W LO ID M W M C) M LO W 00 OD Q C) (D C) M CO t- r- (D M Cf) LO t- I- CC) (D LO I C) 2 M W V' U') LO 0 a W M a N LO C) Lo O 0 Cl CID Q0 1 00 CO N 0 LO C, 114 Cl) (0 M CD 0 W 0 m m LO m N m 11 -T (D ' 00 �2 So M O o Lo N W co co r- 4 — M (8) oc � C ! oc� V' M ll � C L Q C "! ( Q ol � Cl i p I ll :' 0 LO (D 00 OD CF) 1 4' q CF) 00 P- LO 00 (D co LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO Lo co C) a. - C ' I 0 cNi z c C> C) C) C) 0 0 C) 0 C, CD 0 0 0 6F) ( 'It q N (D QO 00 00 00 00 CN V' (D CN 0 C Lq N M CR cq llY Lq q (P q cq (,> O C) (n C) as CC) a) 0) 00 00 OD co 0) OD 0) 00 m 00 co 0) �t 0) 07 a) 0) a) o') a) a) a) a) 0) a) a) a) a) 00 LL :3 R oc� oc� cc� R oc� R oc� oc� oc� R cc� cc� cc� cc� t-- r- rl- tl- r- tl- tl- r-- t- r- tl- t- r- I-- fl_ V� 00 LLI m m m co Cl) Cl) m co Cl) m m Cl) co Cl) m CD to co L.) CD I,- ( R ti ( C! (Q CO o c� ( q - 6 (D M W LO ID M W M C) M LO W 00 OD Q C) (D C) M CO t- r- (D M Cf) LO t- I- CC) (D LO I C) 2 — C CIJ C) 01) CIJ C) C 1* 00 C I* C) (D 0 Lo O CM 7 V: r- : 7 O 1 1 7 to 1' t'-: W P,� W 0 cl� Gi C"! cl� O> n C� cc� kq ( q C"! VL W - 0 M �; �; ;; �; �; O �; �; ;) Y, Y) Y, ;; Y.) 0 ll � Cl i n Cli (1) n cl) n n Cl i Cl i n Cl) Cl) CO- oc� LO 0.) m 00 00 co P- r- I-- So c W L'r) 04 04 CIJ N C CIJ N " N N 04 N " N IT 0 cli c C> C) C) C) 0 0 C) 0 C, CD 0 0 0 C) C) C> CD C> C C) C> CD C CD a C) Cl Cl C 0 C, C) 0 CD 0 0 CD C) 0, (D C) 01 0 C) as 0 C> C) 0 C) 0 0 C) 0 C, CD 0 C) 0 C) C0 It C) Cl) cr) CO 0 OD CY) LO OD 00 Cl) 0 Cl) s. 0 ) V: (D - I- m I-- IT r Cl I'- V C) IT m p- 0 CD t LO Cl CN LO t- P- r C\' (D a) �; 0) O O1 CO 04 (0 ( M co L.) CD I,- ( R ti ( C! (Q CO o c� ( q - o c� a. a �2 �2 00 00 �2 m �2 �2 C4 LO 'r) _? 0 0 0 (D 04 C*4 CIJ N Cq N CN CIJ 04 04 C'i C'4 C'A C'4 00 1 " �R �2 L �2 �2 a N (Y) 0 C) " C ' , C ' 4 Cl) 0 C) 0 C:) C) C. C:) 0 0 C) 0 (D (D C, C', C, M It w N (0 O V' m N (D O a CD Ol 0 Cl) O) C*4 (D O1 CO (D OP) CO (D CD ' 00 04 (D CO O) M" C:) 00 r- Lo co ci 0 06 (.0 q co 06 p- (0 o') N V' tom- C) M (D a) -IT [- C) M 'IT 04 O (7) r- LO V' 04 C) OD n LO CO Cq O IT LO CT [-� V 6 1� V4 - C6 Ld - 06 L6 C C6 (D O) o) M 00 00 00 P, p- fl- (D (.0 Lo LO LO 6 00 (D M W LO ID M W M C) M LO W 00 OD Q C) (D C) M CO t- r- (D M Cf) LO t- I- CC) (D LO I C) 2 t- ct cq r --t r- co a) i- - a) m oo ai m Lo O r- Lo V° M 64 b 64 a) (3) O) co -4 4q �; W W 0 cl� Gi C"! cl� O> n C� cc� kq ( q C"! VL W - 0 Cl i (D (0 LO CO C) 00 0 QO OD I�r C) LO LO CF) 0') 0 (D 0 C) C) C) CF) CY) 00 OD co OD f- I- (D (D Cl) Cl) Cl) n CN CIJ C\l CIJ 04 " CIJ " C*4 " CN! LO 0.) m 00 00 co P- r- I-- So c W L'r) 04 04 CIJ N C CIJ N " N N 04 N " N IT 0 ell E O) I— rl- to Q') cq r- CD LO U�l f r CA C� I m O c C', CO r- 'o m m O 'm 0 ' m 'o M M m t- tl- W) " cn W C\ o N - i Qi 06 t 0 06 Gi - C4 C C CD 1 00 r- to CO I. co ;: 'M s 0 CD, CD (D C> 0 c) (D 0 0 (D 0 C) 0 C (n L Q q q LQ Un L q q q q (n Lq (n q 0 0) F r- LO (r) cq I-. r- CD V) LO t- r- N C) (3) LO Cl) C) M m Cl) U') a) (N (D r- IL Cli M r-� rl-� LQ N C\L (:;? r CQ Cli V a) N W N CD OD (D co (1) V' CO C(,D 0 0.) m 00 00 co P- r- I-- So c W L'r) 04 04 CIJ N C CIJ N " N N 04 N " N C� 0 ell E O) I— rl- to Q') cq r- CD LO U�l f r CA C� I m O c C', CO r- 'o m m O 'm 0 ' m 'o M M m t- tl- W) " cn W C\ o N - i Qi 06 t 0 06 Gi - C4 C C CD 1 00 r- to CO I. co ;: 'M s v M Cll C 0 0 Lo 0 Lo 0 LO 0 0 Lo 0 Lo Lf) 0 a) a) (D CD r cli C\l Cl) V' V' LO LO LO (0 0 c C> C) C) C) 0 0 C) 0 C, CD 0 0 0 C) C) C> CD C> C C) C> CD C CD a C) Cl Cl C 0 C, C) 0 CD 0 0 CD C) 0, (D C) 01 0 C) as 0 C> C) 0 C) 0 0 C) 0 C, CD 0 C) 0 C) C=� C C C C C C C C=� C C q C C=� q u 0 LO C) LD C, 0 Lr) U') (D C) LO V) to C C I \ l l ' l c t 4 c C-4 N N o"S a. C4 00 1 " �R �2 L �2 �2 a N (Y) 0 C) " C ' , C ' 4 0 C) 0 C:) C) C. C:) 0 0 C) 0 (D (D C, C', C, v M Cll $185,000 City of Maplewood, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007E Pond Overlook NET DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 105% of Total Assessment Income Levy Required 02/0112008 - - - - - - 02/01/2009 10,000.00 3.900% 10,096.67 20,096.67 21,101.50 25,080.00 (3,978.50) 02101/2010 15,000.00 3.900% 7,410.00 22,410.00 23,530.50 22,080.00 1,450.50 02/0112011 15,000.00 3.950% 6,825.00 21,825.00 22,916.25 21,360.00 1,556.25 02/0112012 15,000.00 4,000% 6,232,50 21,232,50 22,294.13 20,640,00 1,654,13 02/0112013 15,000.00 4.050% 5,632.50 20,632.50 21,664.13 19,920.00 1,744.13 0210112014 15,000.00 4.150% 5,025.00 20,025.00 21,026.25 19,200.00 1,826.25 02/0112015 15,000.00 4.200% 4,402.50 19,402.50 20,372.63 18,480.00 1,892.63 02/0112016 15,000.00 4.250% 3,772.50 18,772.50 19,711.13 17,760.00 1,951.13 02/0112017 10,000.00 4,300% 3,135,00 13,135,00 13,791.75 17,040,00 (3,248.25) 02/01/2018 10,000.00 4.400% 2,705.00 12,705.00 13,340.25 16,320.00 (2,979.75) 02101/2019 10,000.00 4.450% 2,265.00 12,265.00 12,878.25 15,600.00 (2,721.75) 02/01/2020 10,000.00 4.500% 1,820.00 11,820.00 12,411.00 14,880.00 (2,469.00) 02/01/2021 10,000.00 4,550% 1,370,00 11,370,00 11,938.50 14,160,00 (2,221.50) 02/01/2022 10,000.00 4.550% 915.00 10,915.00 11,460.75 13,440.00 (1,979.25) 02/01/2023 10,000.00 4.600% 460.00 10,460.00 10,983.00 12,720.00 (1,737.00) Total $185,000.00 - $62,066.67 $247,066.67 $259,420.00 $268,680.00 (9,260.00) & J PmdOverlwk / W!712007 / 8,10,1,14 - S P .- Page 14 $200,000 City of Maplewood, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007E DeSoto Area NET DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I CIF Net New DIS 105% Overlev 0210112008 - - - - - - - 02/0112009 - - 11,184.00 11,184.00 (11,184.00) - - 0210112010 10,000.00 3.900% 8,640.00 18,640.00 - 18,640.00 19,572.00 02/0112011 10,000.00 3.950% 8,250.00 18,250.00 - 18,250.00 19,162.50 0210112012 10,000.00 4.000% 7,855.00 17,855.00 - 17,855.00 18,747.75 0210112013 10,000.00 4.050% 7,455.00 17,455.00 - 17,455.00 18,327.75 0210112014 15,000.00 4.150% 7,050.00 22,050.00 - 22,050.00 23,152.50 0210112015 15,000.00 4.200% 6,427.50 21,427.50 - 21,427.50 22,498.88 02/0112016 15,000.00 4.250% 5,797.50 20,797.50 - 20,797.50 21,837.38 0210112017 15, 000.00 4.300% 5,160.00 20,160.00 - 20,160.00 21,168.00 02/0112018 15,000.00 4.400% 4,515.00 19,515.00 - 19,515.00 20,490.75 0210112019 15,000.00 4.450% 3,855.00 18,855.00 - 18,855.00 19,797.75 0210112020 15,000.00 4.500% 3,187.50 18,187.50 - 18,187.50 19,096.88 0210112021 15,000.00 4.550% 2,512.50 17,512.50 - 17,512.50 18,388.13 0210112022 20,000.00 4.550% 1,830.00 21,830.00 - 21,830.00 22,921.50 02/0112023 20,000.00 4.600% 920.00 20,920.00 - 20,920.00 21,966.00 Total $200,000.00 - $84,639.00 $284,639.00 (11,184.00) $273,455.00 $287,127.75 Series 2007& trrzpeovement 1 DeSoto Area J 91512007 f 929 AA4 Page 15 $130,000 City of Maplewood, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 20078 Brookview Dr. Area NET DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I CIF Net New DIS 105% Overlevy 0210112008 - - 02/0112009 - 7,239.18 7,239.18 (7,239.18) 0210112010 5,000.00 1900% 5,592.50 10,592.50 - 10,592.50 11,122.13 0210112011 5,000.00 195010 5,397.50 10,397.50 - 10,397.50 10,917.38 02/0112012 10,000.00 4.000% 5,200.00 15,200.00 - 15,200.00 15,960.00 0210112013 10,000.40 4.050% 4,800.00 14,800.00 - 14,800.00 15,540.00 0210112014 10,000.00 4A5010 4,395.00 14,395.00 - 14,395.00 15,114.75 02/0112015 10,000.00 4.200% 3,980.00 13,980.00 - 13,980.00 14,679.00 0210112016 10,000.00 4.250% 3,560.00 13,560.00 - 13,560.00 14,238.00 0210112017 10,00000 430010 3,135.00 13,135.00 - 13,135.00 13,791.75 0210112018 10,000.00 4.400% 2,705.00 12,705.00 - 12,705.00 13,340.25 0210112019 10,000.00 4.450% 2,265.00 12,265.00 - 12,265.00 12,878.25 0210112020 10,00000 450010 1,82000 11,82000 - 11,82000 12,411.00 0210112021 10,000.00 4.550% 1,370.00 11,370.00 - 11,370.00 11,938.50 0210112022 10,000.00 4.550% 915.00 10,915.00 - 10,915.00 11,460.75 02/0112023 10 4.600% 460.00 10,460.00 - 10,460.00 10,983.00 Total $130,000.00 - $52,834.18 $182,834.18 (7,239.18) $175,595.00 $184,374.75 Seties200791-pwvemmt / Biwkvfei4 Dr. Area / 91512007 / 9. � p ri n I gstedi C) Q N to o �) N U) Q1 � m p O w O 0 c � G 0 0 m U O (U N C W J D 0 W S U W U ii. W m W Q W z d O <t O w (D m h m M U) 't O M h 3 W N I+ N N d d) (0 O . 0 h h 0) h U) h h m O t+ h- W N co O O d' d 7+ O � O U) M m M (b c0 M CO O V' M h eP h N O N M O h M h m d h M O O Ln 0) a L EL Co M N m t0 to N N N N N to v v v v v C'4 N N N N N N N N N N co d m Cl) Z V3 In O N�t (0 M 10 h m to L0 V O 0) 0 0 0 0 0 O a C (00000 N N N N N 0 O N L 0 m V' M h V' O N W r N N N CO M W O O O U) V' cc")) c m ) C) cc")) C V' M � M m M M M M M m M M M M _ V3 r2 m � J M rl' O 0 to O a0 W N O V m "t (o to M . O 0) M M M 0) O r O 't h r (O LO . t6 N M M N N N N N M Cl) M co N M M Sb (0 c0 t0 (0 W c0 W CO W W c0 m (0 IX) LO it L3. W O O d) O m O O) 0) O) O) W O) Q) O h LU V a' V V V (0 V lL (o O Zfl (0 O (O O CO (O (O O O (0 (0 t0 0 CO C0 (0 CO (0 m fR d O (O 00 co N W M N to O O V to (0 (D N M CO o h c0 0) Ln (0 (N h t0 0) LO M O O 3 m m00 m ofoo m fq a C ' W Q) O (P 01 Q1 01 6f O Of W O O O O O o c . h... h'h"h'h'r= a v � LL .... N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � Ht W In O N�t (0 M 10 h m to L0 V O , r O Ln to t-- M M M V h M 0) V U) Ol C0 N 0 00 0) O r 0) O O to t CO '= � e)' O n O t0 M (o O �' O L h a . 0 m V' M h V' O N W r N N N CO M W O O O U) V' cc")) c m ) C) cc")) C V' M � M m M M M M M m M M M M _ m � J h m O V N O M CO V N O d' CO N (D h t6 U1 Cl U) 01 N CO O q N (o U) O C y 0) 14'1 ti" cl' M N N O CO CO N h t0 h tZf M W M dD M CO co W N h N h N it O N �t U7 U7 (0 (0 h !� M W 0) @ O O p p N C N N (0 O <r 00 N O O �t W N !" � UJ Cj d. N N Q co > QY" 6s N cO M t0 w 00 M M U) LO U) M M M O h (O W M O -R Co r f- h h h M �- to U) CO 0 N h V' N N M V' o O M t� N : N �Y M M M N <P (o 0) C h W W M t0 O Q) M � M O O Q3 O r O Ln W � R- p 0 O (O M O N h W w V' C') t- to m V �' O CO O to O M tt i" O Ln Lt) to M e < r M to L) Ln to to cl' <I' -t d' V' <I' I' V V' M O d � L N C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Cn O U) LO LO U) U) U) U} O O O U) U) U) O O p N O M O O N M h M to to h O) O m N Co M LO U) W N C U) B M W (o (0 (O i M VN' M M W h t (a (0 m Cl) V V V v O d � z L L . . . . . . . . . . . i W cq a C�0 C�0 CL ( v 00 v mtntntntntntntn000tntntn(D m h rn o M IL h oc 0) LC) U) 0) N M r Ln r M CO O O N (O N O t0 zr U) O U) M M O d' M M M m h (0 Lo to V M m M N M to p Ln Ln Ln Ln Nr v d' v T 4 T v V v O L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D7 Ln U) to U) L0 U) to O O O to L0 to O Q7 M h h h h h h N N N 4n N t� N N O h O M O O N M h CT O M h h h M O L0 U) O N M W CO Co N m w N h V' O t0 co O m CO CO 0) 00 m p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v = O O Ln O Lo Ln O Ln O O Ln O Ln U) O (A tT 0) o o .- N N m v, "It U) Ln U) CO p M M M V' V V' V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> O EL 'v O O o C C C 0 0 C C a C C o a O Lri00o0CD 0trio0tritr;0uitn o ' N M V' Ln O M M M V Ln Ln CO CA O) O �- M M co M co M m M m M m M Mr W O Q. M W 02 Ln CO h 0 a N M ° o ° o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 h Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h h c0 O O O h M cc } O V n N O E N O W N O a N O W } a7 N M � O ' G . S m t6 V t6 p Q M N c O UU O d. _! V �o U N a 9 co > QY" N _ L d c N Z ^'s p0 Il mQQ Z{_mQ ZS 'ri THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRUNGSTEDUNCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $5 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,k0UNNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2007B Proposa for the Bonds will be received on K8ondoy. September 24, 2007 until 10:30 A.M., Central Ti[n8 at the OffiCSS Of SphDOStSd |OCOrpO[8tmd. 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. I to] 903 WI-11 6ohngst8d will assume OO liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Spri ngsted pr to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute @ CODtr@Ct between the bidder and the City to pUrCh@S9 the Bonds [8g@Pd|8Sa of the manner in which the Proposal i3submitted. () Sealed Bidding. Proposals may be submitted in o sealed envelope or by fax (551)223-3046 to 8ohngat8d. Si PnUpOs@|S, without final price or COUpODs, may be submitted to 8phngst8d prior tO the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to SpringSted the final Pn3pOs@| price and Q]Up0D3, by b3|SphOnS (651) 223-3000 or fax /051\223-304S for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. (b) Electronic Bidding. Notice is hereby given that electronic proposals will be received via P/\R|T7 - For of the electronic bidding the time i i Sd by PARITv shall constitute the official time with respect to all Bids submitted to PARITY Each bidder shall be solely responsible for making necessary arrangements to access PARITY�' for purposes of submitting its electronic Bid in a timely manner and in compliance with the requirements of the Terms 0fProposal. Neither the City, its agents nor PAF<|TY° shall have any duty Or obligation t0 undertake registration to bid for any prospective bidder or to provide or ensure electronic access to any qualified prospective bidder, and neither the City' its agents nor PAF<|TY 0 ahG|| be responsible for a bidder's failure to register to bid or for any t3i|UPe in the proper operation [f. or have @Oy liability for any delays or interruptions 0f0r any donnog9S C8US8d by the S9rviCRa of /\ ���|T«�. The City i3 using the services OfP/\R|Tv as a communication mechanism to conduct the electronic bidding for the Bonds, and Tv is not an agent of the City. If any prov of this Terms of Proposal conflict with information provided by PAR|TY Terms 0f Proposal shall control. Further information about PAR|lY including any fee charged, may be obtained from: PAR|TY Bnoadway.2 nd Floor, New York, New York 10018 Customer Support: (212) 849-5000 ^ Pmliminory - nubjeoto change. DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated October 15. 2807. as the date Vforiginal issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and /\V0Vst 1 Of each year, cVnnnn8n[in0 August 1. 2008. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months. The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts* as follows: 2009 $125.00 2013 $360,000 2017 $340.00 2021 $380/000 2010 $330.00 014 $330/00 2018 $350.00 2022 $395,000 2011 $340.00 2015 $330l00 2019 $355.00 023 $405.000 2012 $350.000 2016 $335.000 2020 $365.000 ^ The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the principal amount of the Bonds offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. In the event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any discount taken by the successful bidder will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced. Proposals for the Bonds may contain 8maturity schedule providing for 8combination of serial bonds and term bonds. All term bonds shall b8 subject tV mandatory sinking fund redemption at a price of par plus accrued interest to the d8L8 of redemption and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above. |n order b] designate term bonds, the proposal must specify "Years of Term Maturities" in the spaces provided on the Proposal Form. BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM The Bonds will b8 issued bvmeans of8 book entry system with m] physical distribution of Bonds made tVthe public. The Bonds will b8 issued in fully registered form and one Bond, pepn8G8nUnQ the aggregate principal 8nn0UnL of the Bonds maturing in each y98r, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company /"DTC"\, New York, New YVrk, which will 8tL GS s8tUhUeS depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries nn8d8 on the books and records of OTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to [)TC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of OTC will be the responsibility of OTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial Ovvn8rG. The purchaser, 88 8 condition of delivery of the BondS, will be required to deposit the Bonds with [)TC. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar, which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. The City may elect on February 1.2018, and on any day thereafter, k} prepay Bonds due on[n after February 1 Redemption may b8in whole orin part and ifin part Ed the option Cfthe City and in such manner as the {|iiv shall determine. If less than all Bonds of nn8tVrih/ are called for n8d8nnpL|On the C|h/ will notify [)TC of the particular amount of such rn8tVdh/ to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity LO be n8d98nn8d and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity LVU8redeemed. All prepayments shall U8at8 price nf par plus accrued interest. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be g8DSro| obligations of the City for which the City will D|8dg8 its full faith and credit and power bD levy direct general od valorem taxes. |n addition, the City will pledge special @SseSsnn9Dts against benefited properties. The pn]Ce8dS will be used t0 fiD8DnR various improvement projects within the City. Proposals Sh@U be for not |8Ss than $5,030 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals 3hoU be oCSOrnponied by o Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") in the form 0f8 CRdifiSd or cashier's check or 8 Financial Surety Bond in the G[n0uDt of $50,900, payable to the Order of the City. |f8 check is used, it must accompany the proposal. If Financial Surety Bond is USRd. it must befrom an insurance company licensed to issue such 8 bond in the State 0fMinnesota, and pneapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Sp[ingst8d |OCO[pOrot8d prior to the opening of the pnJpOa8|S. The FiD8DniG| Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using @ HnGnCiG| Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required t0 submit its Deposit to Sphng3had Incorporated in the form of certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Sp[ingst8d |OCOrpOrGt8d not later than 3:30 P.M., Central linne, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that ti[n9 the Financial Surety Bond may be dr@vvD by the City to satisfy the [)8pO3it [8qUin8[nSDt. The Deposit received from the pUroh8aer, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement, will be deposited by the City and no interest will @CCnJ8 to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for ovv8rd of the Bonds is adj0Urned, recessed, or continued to another date without award Of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall b8iD integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. There is no limit on the interest rate spread if quoted in level Or ascending order; however, no rate for any [nGtU[itv Sh@|| be more than 1.096 lower than any prior rate. Bonds of the Sonoe maturity 3ho|| bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the dote of maturity. NO conditional proposals will b9accepted. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis Vfthe lowest interest rate b] be determined on 8trV8 interest toGi (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each pn}poG8|. in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: /i\vv8ivS non-substantive informalities 0fany pnJpOS8| or of nn8tbars relating to the receipt Of proposals and 8vv8rd of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without nGUse. and (iii) reject any proposal that the City determines t0 have failed to comply with the terms herein. A 0 [oil 10 6 11 [61:9- a us] 001 0 M10 V60611111 9 [01 N1 If the Bonds qualify for iS3uoDC8 of any policy of nlUnkcip8| bond iOsU[8nDS Or COn1[nhm9nt therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the iSSu8DC8 Of any such CO[nnlit[nSOt Sh8|| be at the SO|8 option and 8npSDs8 of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased coats of issuance of the Bonds n3SU|tin8 from such purchase Of iOSU[8nc9 Sho|| be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received 8 rating On the Bonds from o rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall b8 the responsibility Of the purchaser. F8i|Una of the rnUnidpo| bond insurer to issue the D0|iCy after Bonds have been Gvv8PdRd to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. If the Bonds qualify for assignment Of CUS|F` nUnnb8r3 such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such DunnbRrS OD any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure Or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days hd|ovvng the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without Cost to the purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be Subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal Opinion of Briggs and K8orQon, Professional ASSOoi8tiOn Of Saint PGU| and K8inDeGpO|iS. PWiDneSOtG and Of CUStO[n@ry closing papers, including G no- litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or 8qUivG|8nt, funds that ShG|| be [8C8iv8d at the OffiCRS of the City Or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Unless oOnnp|i@noe with the b*nnS of payment for the Bonds has been [nGd8 impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the pUPCh8S9r Sh@|| be |i@b|8 h3 the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with Said terms for payment. Alei ON 19 1 ON Ll -1 On the d8L8 of actual issuance and delivery [fthe Bonds, the {|U« will execute and deliver 8 Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (th8 "Und8rtaking")vvh8r8Und9rthe City will covenant for the benefit of the owners of the Bonds to provide certain financial and other information 8bVUL the City and notices of certain occurrences to information repositories as specified in and required by SEC RV|8 15c2-12/b\(5). OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the pr8p8nBbVn of an Official Statement containing pertinent inh]nn8ik]n relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as 8 nearly final (}ffi[i8| Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to SG|9. any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, 8phng8ted Incorporated, 388 Jackson 8Lne8{, Suite 3O0, Saint Paul, Minnesota 551U1. telephone /051\223-3U00. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, phDCip8| @nl0uOts and interest rates Of the BODdS, together with any other information required by |avv. 3ho|| constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter Of the syndicate t0 which the Bonds are awarded 20O copies Ofthe (]ffioi@| Statement and the addendum Or addenda described above. The City designates the Senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for pUrp of distributing C0piRS of the Final C)ffiCi8| St@L8nl8Ot to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering @ pnnpOSo| with respect to the Bonds 80na83 thereby that if its pn]pO38| is 8CCSDted by the City (i) it Sh8|| accept such designation and (ii) it Sh8|| enter into 8 C0nb'oCtua| relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Ma 1 115110 Will /s/ K8[8D GuilfOi|8 Qty Clerk Page 21 Agenda Item L8 To: City Council From: Greg Copeland, City Manager Date: September 6, 2007 Re: City Council Meeting Change for Public Hearings At the Citizen's Forum on September 4, 2007 there was a discussion how the City Council could conduct it's required public hearings on such matters as street assessments, land use changes, redevelopment and comprehensive planning amendments and any other matters. The recent experience of public hearings scheduled for 7:00 p.m. not beginning until much later was a concern for residents who came to the City Council Meeting for the scheduled hearing and had to wait an hour or more for the hearing to begin. One resident observed that he and many of his neighbors had to get up the next morning to go to work and hoped the City Council would consider making a change that would allow the public hearings to take place in a more timely fashion so people could get home at a reasonable time I have discussed this matter with the Mayor and Senior Staff and it is generally agreed that an annual public hearings calendar can be established in which either the first or third Monday of the month could be designated for Public Hearings. The Public Hearing Meetings would shift between the first and third Monday to allow for months where a holiday falls on the first Monday, such as Labor Day and News Years did in 2007. The discussion at the Citizens Forum was that Public Hearings Meetings would be reserved for that purpose only and the agenda would not include regular meeting items such as approval of minutes, visitor presentations, consent agenda items, award of bids, unfinished or new business or council presentations. .T"j-e&m we eaa September 6, 2007 This Public Hearing Meeting policy could be implemented as soon as November of this year. In the interest of efficiently hearing and considering Maplewood Citizens comments on matters before the City Council that require a Public Hearing, I recommend the following be adopted by the City Council: The City Council establish the first Monday of each month as the Public Hearings Meeting for that purpose only, to act on any and all matters that require a Pubic Hearing. As an amendment to the: Rules of Procedure for City Council and Council Meetings as Section One, I and the following amendment to Section F Order of Business to add Section F.1, IAN Order of Business For Public Hearing Meetings At the hour appointed for meeting, the members shall be called to order by the Mayor or in his/her absence by the Acting Mayor. Upon the appearance of the quorum, the Council shall proceed to business which shall be conducted in the established order: A. Call to Order A. B. C. D. E. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Approval of Agenda Public Hearings Adjournment N Agenda Item L9 J oge&u we Caa To: City Council From: Greg Copeland, City Manager Date: September 6, 2007 Re: Discussion of our City Council Policy regarding City Boards, Commissions and Committees Disciplining Procedures The City of Maplewood Personnel Policies specifically exempts under: Scope A. Personnel Covered Except as otherwise specifically provided, these policies apply to all employees of the City. These policies do not apply to: 3) Members of City Boards, Commissions and Committees; Therefore when a circumstance arises where there is a report of possible misconduct or unethical behavior by a commission member, an appointee of the City Council, that involves a City employee covered by and /or protected by the Personnel Policy, there is no specific policy in place to address that situation, other than a blanket statement of policy that the City Council may remove a Commission member for unethical behavior or other misconduct. Obviously, the City Council as the appointing authority retains full discretion over the process of conducting any disciplinary hearing or taking any other action it deems appropriate in matters regarding City commission members. However„ as there is no policy in place as to specific procedure to follow in such a matter I believe it might be prudent to discuss whether the procedure the Council should follow in effecting such removal should be set forth in a policy. Currently, the City Council in its Rules of Procedure, Section 8, General Rules of Order, has adopted Roberts Rules of Order. as its authority on parliamentary practice on matters not specifically covered in the Council's Rules of Procedure. Roberts Rules Section XX Disciplinary Procedures is written contemplating its use by a private association or organization, a society, not a public body. September 6, 2007 I would recommend that should the City Council wish to adopt a formal Procedure for removal of Commission member, that the Council authorize City staff to draft a policy that follows Robert's Rules but constructs the process to conform with Minnesota Open Meeting Laws and any other relevant laws to ensure a fair and open procedure that is easily understood by all parties RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to prepare a fair, open and transparent disciplinary procedure for addressing instances of unethical behavior or other misconduct by City Council appointees to the City's Boards, Commissions and Committees. 2