HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 08-27 City Council PacketMAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, August 27, 2007
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 15
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Acknowledgement of Maplewood Residents Serving the Country
r
lelmmmao1wo)3"
Mayor's Address on Protocol:
"Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council. It is our desire to keep all discussions civil as we work through
difficult issues tonight. If you are here for a Public Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with
the Policies and Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. When you address the council,
please state your name and address clearly for the record. All commentsIquestions shall be posed to the Mayor and
Council. I then will direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments. "
E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. August 13, 2007 Council Manager Workshop
2. August 13, 2007 City Council Meeting
3. August 16, 2007 City Council Meeting (Continuation of August 13, 2007)
F. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1 .
G. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Swearing in of Police Officer Markese Benjamin
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Ferndale/Geranium Street Improvements, City Project 07-14
a. Assessment Hearing 7:00 p.m.
b. Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll
c. Resolution Awarding Construction Contract
2. Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-15
a. Assessment Hearing 7:15 p.m.
b. Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll
c. Resolution Authorizing the Installation of Burke Avenue Cul-De-Sac based on
Resident Petition Request
d. Resolution Awarding Construction Contract
3. City Code Amendment — Planning Commission First Reading. 7:30 p.m.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Claims
2. City Ordinance Update — Building Codes
3. Conditional Use Permit Review — Liberty Classical Academy 1717 English Street
4. Conditional Use Permit Review — Kline Nissan 3090 Highway 61 North
5. Authorization to Purchase Total Station for Engineering Services Program
6. Approval of Developer's Agreement for Walgreen's at White Bear Avenue and Beam
Avenue, City Project 04-37
7. Mogren Street Improvements, City Project 06-17, Resolution Approving Cooperative
Agreement with MnDOT for Signal Reimbursement Expenses
8. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MnReleaf Grant for Oak Wilt Disease Control
9. Temp-Seasonal-Casual Part-time Pay Ranges for 2007
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a
member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered
separately.
J. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Pond Overlook Public Improvements, City Project 07-08, Resolution Awarding Construction
Contract
K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Adoption of the Capital Improvement Plan
L. NEW BUSINESS
1. Renewal of Annual Lawful Gambling License — White Bear Avenue Business Association at
AMF Maplewood Lanes and The Dive Bar.
2. Approval of Wine and Strong Beer License — Dinh Yin Thong — Bambu Asian Cuisine.
3. Set Special Meeting Date for the Purpose of Canvassing the Primary Election Results.
4. Kohiman Lane Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-21, Resolution Ordering Preparation
of Feasibility Study
5. Myrtle-Idaho Street Improvements, City Project 07-19, Resolution Ordering Preparation of
Feasibility Study
6. Pond-Dorland Street Improvements, City Project 07-20, Resolution Ordering Preparation of
Feasibility Study
7. Arkwright Utility Extensions, City Project 07-22, Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility
Study.
8. Mogren Street Improvements, City Project 06-17
a. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll
b. Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment Hearing for
September 24, 2007
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. H. Alan Kantrud
ro
I all [fill N ! I ky, 1:4 Z JU
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request.
The request for this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at
(651) 249-2001 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the
City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council
Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions
can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council
meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to
one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language.
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
MANAGE R/WORKSHOP
Monday, August 13, 2007
Council Chambers, City Hall
5:00 p.m.
4M COX*] 01] :4
A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order
at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Longrie.
B. ROLL CALL
A
0
4
Diana Longrie, Mayor
Rebecca Cave, Councilmember
Erik Hjelle, Councilmember
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember
Will Rossbach, Councilmember
Present
Present
Present
Present at 5:30 p.m.
Present
Mayor Longrie moved to approve
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle
— Mayor Longrie, Councilmember's Cave,
Hjelle, Rossbach
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. South Maplewood Moratorium Prese
Madson, South Maplewood Study.
on by Rose Lorsung, Senior Planner, Schoell
2. Discussion of Proposal for Finalization
South Maplewood Land Use Study.
2008 Comprehensive Plan Planning Process, Rose Lorsung, Senior Planner, Schoell
Update of Parks, Trails and Open Space Element of Comprehensive Plan during
b. Comprehensive Plan Update on Remaining 12 Elements in 2008.
a
After Rose Lorsung with Schoell Madson gave her presentation the city council had a question
and answer session. The council discussed the Parks, Trails, and Open Space and questioned
whether there was a need for a task force to complete this process.
Mayor Longrie moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:50 p.m.
August 13, 2007, City Council Workshop
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m., Monday, August 13, 2007
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 07-014
A.
141
A
A
CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Ch
at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Longrie.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Diana Longrie, Mayor
Rebecca Cave, Councilmember
Erik Hjelle, Councilmember
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember
Will Rossbach, Councilmember
Fi',PPROTAl—OF-AGEr1aA--
Mayor Longrie added M2. Old Gla
City Manager, Copeland added
Claim.
Councilmember Cave
Seconded by Mayor Longrie.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
rs and was called to order
Fire Station Parcel and M3. City Website Information.
Ayes — All
and N1. Data Practices
Minutes from the July 23, 2007, 5 p.m. Council/Manager Workshop.
Councilmember Juenemann telephoned Citizen Services Manager and City Clerk, Karen
Guilfoile, with a correction. The July 23, 2007, City Council Workshop minutes should reflect
Rebecca Cave as the Acting Mayor in Mayor Longrie's absence rather than Acting Chairperson.
This correction should be made in the City Council Workshop minutes and in the regular July 23,
2007, City Council minutes.
Councilmember Cave moved to approve the Council/Manager Workshop minutes of July 23,
2007, 5 p.m. as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle.
Ayes- Cave, Hjelle, Rossbach
Abstention — Juenemann, Mayor Longrie
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting
2. Minutes from the July 23, 2007, 7:00 p.m. City Council Meeting.
I
The same correction should be made to the City Council Minutes as noted by Councilmember
Juenemann during the approval of the City Council Workshop minutes.
Councilmember Cave moved to approve the City Council Meeting minutes of July 23, 2007, as
amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle.
Ayes- Cave, Hjelle, Juenemann, Rossbach
Abstention — Mayor Longrie
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Brian Gardner, Eagle Scout from BSA Troop 902, 1963 Maryknoll Avenue North,
Maplewood. Brian announced an upcoming Emergency Preparedness Workshop being
held at the Church of Jesus Christ of Ladder Day Saints, Little Canada, 2400 Edgerton
Street North, August 18 from 1-4 p.m.
2. Bill Kayser, 6408 - 81' Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, addressed the council. He
presented the council with a handout which he said he had also mailed to them.
3. Nancy Lazaryan, (in propria persona, in summon jure), 10734 West Lake Road, Rice,
addressed the council. Ms. Lazaryan gave a copy of the Notice of Motion and Motion from
Judge Joanne Smith from August 21, 2007, to the City Clerk, Karen Guilfoile.
4. Victoria Marchetti, 1033 Conway Street, St. Paul, addressed the council. Ms. Marchetti
wanted to introduce herself and let everyone know she was present if anyone needed to
speak to her.
5. Ron Cockriel, 943 Century Avenue, Maplewood, addressed the council. He spoke
regarding Minnesotans who were recently deployed and those who are currently serving
our country in the war. He also expressed how people deal with change. Both change in
day today life and change in the City of Maplewood.
Joe and Ms. Michael Bailey, 1615 Sterling Avenue South, Maplewood, addressed the
council. Ms. Bailey said she supports both Rose Lorsung and Schoell Madson in the work
they have done in the South Maplewood Land Use Study along with the work they have
done with the neighbors in South Maplewood. She felt they were very professional and
their ideas and plans were easy to understand.
9
APPOINTMENTSIPRESENTATIONS
Citizen Services — Recreation Program Report — Karen Guilfoile, Citizen Services
Manager.
Ms. Guilfoile gave a Recreation Program presentation regarding events and recreation
programs over the past 6 months. Also included was statistical information showing an
increase in participation from 2006.
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting
9
2. Public Works — Parks Maintenance Report — Chuck Ahl, Director of Public Works &
Engineering.
Mr. AN spoke regarding the recent storm that hit certain areas in the City of Maplewood
and gave brush pick up instructions for areas between Larpenteur Avenue and Conway
and McKnight and Century Avenue. Then Mr. AN gave a Park Maintenance Report
informing the city council of the benefits of blending the Park and Public Works
Maintenance Departments in the 2007 budget.
3. Fire Department Federal Grant — Chief Lukin
Maplewood Fire Chief, Steve Lukin, stated the city had applied for and received a
$150,000 federal grant to pay for laptop computers that would be installed in the city's
police and ambulance vehicles allowing emergency personnel to receive faster and more
complete information from the Ramsey County Dispatch Center. This will allow
Maplewood's emergency personnel to better serve the public.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. The Shores Senior Housing Development 940 Frost Avenue.
a. Land Use Plan Clarification — Gladstone — High (Requires 4 votes)
b. Street Right-of-way vacation
C. Public easement vacation
d. Preliminary Plat
e. Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
f. Design Approval
1. Planner, Shann Finwall gave the report.
2. Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director answered questions
3. Link Wilson, Kaas Wilson Architects, answered questions.
4. Denny O'Donnell, representing Walker Methodist, gave a report.
5. Linda Olson, Chairperson, Community Design Review Board, gave a
report.
6. Lorraine Fischer, Chairperson, Planning Commission, gave a report.
7. Steve Lukin, Fire Chief, answered questions
Mayor Longrie opened the public hearing and the following individuals spoke:
(a) Richard Currie, Historical Preservation Commission, 1937 Kenwood Dr W Maplewood.
(b) Linda Olson, 2005 County Road C East, Maplewood.
(c) Joy Tkachuck, 1088 Gordon Avenue, Maplewood.
(d) Jan Steiner McGovern, 1876 East Shore Drive, Maplewood.
(e) Mindy MacRunnel, 1890 Adele Street, Maplewood.
Mayor Longrie closed the public hearing.
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting 3
CouOC|memberC8ve moved to approve the comprehensive land use amendment resolution.
This resolution clarifies the comprehensive land use map definition for the Gladstone high d8nnitv
land use designation as follows:
Gladstone Hi (G-U): Locations with stacked housing units with densit ranging from
12 to 30 units per acre.
Seconded bv Mayor LOnghH. Aveo Ma Lon CnunCj|member's
Cave. Hielle
berSJuen8m@nn,
�
The motion failed bv a vote of 3 to 2 (Comprehensive Plan Amendments require 4
Councilmember Cave moved to amprove the public vacation resolution. This resolution is for the
public vacation of 20 feet of right-of-way along East Shore Drive and the vacation of a sanitary
sewer easement located on the west side of the property at 940 Frost Avenue. Prior to the city
recording this resolution, the applicant must complete following:
a. The applicant shall grant the city a right-of-entry to complete the sanitary sewer
abandonment work.
b. The applicant shall dedicate additional right-of-way to the city at the southwest corner of
the Frost Avenue and East Shore Drive intersection for the construction of the proposed
Seconded by Mayor Longrie. Ayes — All
PUBLIC VACATION RESOLUTION 07-08-133
WHEREAS, Link Wilson, Kaas Wilson Architects, Representing the Owner and
Developer, Bart Montanari of Dabar Development, has applied for the vacation of a portion of the
East Shore Drive right-of-way adjacent the property at 940 Frost Avenue and a sanitary sewer
easement located on the west side of the property at 940 Frost Avenue as follows.
Right-of-Way: The westerly 20-feet of East Shore Drive running the entire length of the property
at 940 Frost Avenue.
Sanitary Sewer Easement: Part of E. 10 acres of the W. 20 acres of Government Lot 2 described
as follows: Beginning at intersection of W. line of said 10 acres and S'ly line of Frost Ave. as now
located; thence "OO' E a distance of811 00 feet to intersection of E. line of said 10 acres
and KJ'|y line 0f East Shore Drive; thence N.0l said E. line 18B.J feet; thence VV at ri 8ngheS
87.5 feet; thence NW'k/@t8n angle [f81"57'to the right 8 distance [f813.05 feet to said S.line
Of Frost Av8.; thence SVV'|y thereon 17.3 feet, more Vr less to beginning; all in Sec. 1O.T. 29, R.
22, together with that portion Of the above described land S.Of the previously described line
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting 4
which lies \A/ Of@ line running N\A/k/ from the SE corner Gf the said E. 1O acres Of the VV. 20
acres of said Government Lot 2 to @ point 189.02 feet N. of and 5O feet VV. of said SE corner,
which easement shall include the perpetual right nf said Village of Maplewood, its successors or
assigns, h] construct, maintain, operate and repair underground sewer mains, pipes and
appurtenances over and across the strip of land hereinbefore described, together with perpetual
easement for ingress and egress, all without additional compensation.
WHEREAS, the history of these public vacations iagsfollows:
1 [}n July 17.20O7. the planning commission
vacations. The city staff published a notice
the abutting property owners. The planninc
chance to speak and present written staterT
considered reports and recommendations c
recommended that the city council approve
2. OO August 13
considered reports and recommendations of
WHEREAS, after the city approves
right-of-way property will go to the following a
Address: 940 Frost
Property Identification Number: 16292231
Existing Legal
Avenue Connection
ield a public hearing about the proposed
i the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to
,ommission gave everyone at the hearing a
!nts. The planning commission also
the city staff. The planning commission
'ie vacation.
op038i The city council also
staff and planning commission.
of the right-of-way, public interest iOthe
S`of Frost Avenue 8S described in Document No. 1999021,W'Of
lescribed in Document No. 1999021, N'of East Shore Drive as
367903@ndNE'of@|inedescribed as commencing at the center of
9 degrees 32 minutes 38 seconds W, assumed bearing, along the N
2, 1130.00 feet, to the point ofbeginning; thence South 27 degrees
23 minutes 03 seconds East, 1121.18 feet to an angle in the north line of said East Shore Drive,
said angle point being 658.56 feet westerly of the East line of said government lot 2 as measured
along the N line of said East Shore Drive and said line there terminating.
New Legal Description (After Pbattng): Lot 1 Block 1 The Shores.
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting 5
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described
right-of-way vacation for the following reasons:
1. The city's proposed road improvements along East Shore Drive do not require such a wide
right-of-way, and therefore the vacation of the 20-foot-wide portion of the right-of-way is in
the public interest and will allow the applicant additional land for development.
2. Installation of sanitary sewer along East Shore Drive is part of the public improvements
planned in connection with the development. As such, the existing sanitary sewer line
located on the west side of the property will be abandoned and removed. The sanitary
sewer easement will no longer be needed and therefore the vacation of the easement is in
the public interest.
Prior to the city recording the vacation of the right-of-way and sanitary sewer easement the
applicant must complete the following:
1. The applicant shall grant the city a right-of-entry to complete the sanitary sewer
abandonment work.
2. The applicant shall dedicate additional right-of-way to the city at the southwest corner of the
Frost Avenue and East Shore Drive intersection for the construction of the proposed
roundabout.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on August 13, 2007.
Seconded by Councilmember Cave. Ayes — Mayor Longrie, Councilmember's
Cave, Hjelle, Juenemann
Nay — Councilmember Rossbach
Mayor Longrie moved to approve the preliminary plat date-stamped April 19, 2007, for the Shores
(previously called Lake Phalen Estates) located at 940 Frost Avenue. Approval is subject to the
following conditions:
a. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall comply with all requirements as specified in the city engineering department's May
22, 2007 review and SEH engineering consultant's May 17, 2007 review.
b. Prior to final plat approval, the following must be submitted for city staff approval:
1 Dedication of drainage and utility easement agreements around all public storm
water facilities on the site.
2) Dedication of a 10- foot -wide drainage/utility/pedestrian easement along the south
side of Frost Avenue, along the entire northerly boundary of the Shores property.
3) Dedication of an 8-foot-wide pedestrian easement along the proposed trail to be
located on the west side of the building running from the Frost Avenue sidewalk to
the East Shore Drive sidewalk.
4) Rename the plat The Shores.
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting 6
C. Record all easement agreements with the final plat.
Seconded bvCouOCi|mernberCave. Ayes — Mayor Lon8he,COUDCi|rnernber'3
Cave, HU8Ue.JUenennann
Nay —Cnund|m8mbSrQ0ssbach
K88yOrUonohe moved to al2l2rove the conditional use permit resolution attached in the staff report
(Attachment 29). This resolution approves the conditional use permit for a 180 senior housing
planned unit development within the Shoreland Overlay District of Phalen Lake.
WHEREAS, Developer,
Bart Mont@n8hnfO8b8r Development, applied for 8 conditional use permit for a planned unit
development [o construct 81BO-unit senior housing complex known 8s The res.
WHEREAS, this permit applies tothe following property:
Address: 940 Frost Avenue
Property Identification Number: 162922310024
Existing Legal Description: That part of Government Lot 2, Sec. 16, T. 29, R. 22, Ramsey
County, Minnesota which lies S'of Frost Avenue as described in Document No. 1999021, W' of
Frost Avenue Connection as described in Document No. 1999021, N' of East Shore Drive as
described in Document No. 367903, and NE'of a line described as commencing at the center of
said Section 16, thence S 89 degrees 32 minutes 38 seconds W, assumed bearing, along the N
line of said Government Lot 2, 1130.00 feet, to the point of beginning; thence South 27 degrees
23 minutes 03 seconds East, 1121.18 feet to an angle in the north line of said East Shore Drive,
le point being 658.56 feet westerly of the East line of said government lot 2 as measured
along the N line of said East Shore Drive and said line there terminating.
New Legal Description (After Platting): Lot 1 Block 1 The Shores
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. (]n July 17.2O07.the planning commission held 8 public hearing. City staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave
8v8n/OOe aL the hearing 8 chance t0 speak and present written statements. The planning
commission also considered reports from the city staff.
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting 7
2. (}n August 13,2007, the city council reviewed this request. The city council also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-
described COnditiOO8] use permit, b8cGUS8:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code ofordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing Or planned character Vfthe surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity,
that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, to any
person or property, because of excessive i srn0k8, dust, odor, funn8S, water orair
p0||UtiOn dc8inGg8, water runoff, vibration, UOSighUiDeSS, e|8dTiC@| interference or
other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular tnc
traffic congestion Vr unsafe access on existing ~~~~ or 1
G. The use would b8 served by adequate public facill
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and
7. The use would not create excessive aKdditi
8. The use would
scenic features into the
S. The use would cause mini
The engineering
engineering plans. These
engineering department's
2007 review.
9
ea| streets and would not create
services, including StR}BtS, pD|iC8
Vstems, schools and parks.
costs tor pubill
id incorporate
mental effects.
ities or services.
the site's natural and
!nt shall review and determine approval Of all final construction and
plans shall comply with all requirements aS specified iO the city
May 22, 2007, review and SEH engineering consultant's May 17,
2. All construction shall follow the plans date-stamped April 18.2O07, and with revisions 8s
noted in The city council may approve major changes to the p|@O3. City staff
may approve minor changes to the plans.
3. The project is approved with 120 underground and surface parking spaces (emphasizing the
use nf underground parking) and 3O proof Of parking spaces. This i88 parking reduction Vf
21O parking spaces (30U parking spaces are required per city COde). The applicant shall
maximize the use 0f pervious pavers for the surface parking spaces.
4. The project is approved with 8141 square foot floor area reduction in the required unit floor
area for the memory care and assisted living units (58Osquare foot units are required per city
code; 490 to 509 square foot units are proposed).
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting 8
5. The proj i88pprovedvvdh820-hJ0Lfronty8nd88tb@Ck8k}nQFrD8tAvenUeh}rtheDne-sk}ry
kitchen portion of the building (30 front yard setback required per city code).
0. The project is approved with storage space Vf not less than 48 cubic feet for the memory care
and transitional care units /120 cubic feet Of storage area per unit required per city COd8\
7. The project is approved with four floors.
8. All signs OnU1ep must be approved bv the community design rev board.
S. Approval is conditioned on the owner constructing or funding neighborhood entry
monument sign 8t the intersection 0f Frost Avenue and East Shore Drive. Signage proposal
10. Approval is conditioned on the applicant implementing in terior
reflects the previous use of the property as the St. Paul Tourist Cabin site. Signage proposal
to be submitted to the Historical Preservation Commission for approval.
11. The approved landscape plan and tree preservation requirements shall be subject to
monitoring bv city staff k} assure compliance. Minor modificat b] these pla shall be
subject tn review by staff while major rnodifiCaUoms shall require city council approval.
12. The proposed construction must b
approval Dr the permit shall end. The city council may extend this deadline for one year.
13 Th city counc shall rev this year.
���
The Maplewood City oK�D0DAu�13 200�
�� --- _l r ~ —�~~' ' .
Seconded by �� /\voa—K�avorL�n�he,(|Dun{i|nnen�b8�s
' ' ^ ~
Cave, HjeA|e.Juenemann
MayorLnnoho
Avenue Approval issubject
to the applicant doing the following:
@. Repeat this rev in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
b. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant must submit to staff for
approval the following items:
1 ) Verification the Shores plat has been recorded.
2\ Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineer plans. These
plans shall comply with all requirements 8s specified in the city engineering
department's May 22.20O7 review and SEH engineering consultant's May 17.
2007 review. |D addition, the engineering plans should be revised GSfollows:
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting 9
��
=
��
�m
Tree Preservation:
1 The rev grading plan shall preserve the large specimen
cottonwood tree (heritage tree) located On the north side Ofthe
property, adjacent Frost Avenue (48-iOchtr88).
2. Rev to the grading plan Showing that the most easterly
retaining vv8U i8 shifted to the west to make every effort to preserve
the three specimen oak trees and other significant trees in the area.
3. Rev h]the grading plan shifting wall located 0O
the north side Cfthe wetland to the north, toward the building, to
make every effort to preserve significant trees in this area.
�
4. The applicant shall work closely with th
department to reduce the size or quantity of rainwater gardens
needed on the site in an attempt kJ reduce grading UUinl@tek/
preserve trees.
5. The applicant shall work closely with the city engineer
department to reduce the of grading needed along the Frost
Avenue and East Shore Drive property lines in8n attempt 0]
preserve trees and screen the property from these streets.
The applicant shall work closely with the city engineering departmen to
reduce rainwater gardens needed nn the site |n8n
attempt to reduce grading and ultimately preserve trees.
Revision to the grading plan to incorporate pervious pavers or pavement on
the following areas: loading dock, northwest patio, parking spaces located
in the center of the curved driveway, under the entry canopy, and at the
C@r8
venue and East Shore Dhma into the deve|0Dment ifDossib|e.
��
��
C)
��
��
cation of trash and recycling receptacles throughout the site.
The location 0f benches scattered throughout the site, along the trails and
Removal of the south driveway on East Shore Drive.
Relocation of 0D the west side 0fthe
building to wrap 8n}Und the south side of the building and exit onto East
Shore Drive, south Cf the driveway.
e) Location Vf all required surface and proof Of parking spaces.
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting
im
Location of a crosswalk on East Shore Drive. Crosswalk to extend from the
trail located on the south side of the driveway across the street to the
existina trail/sidewalk on the east side of East Shore Drive.
M C.
4\ Rev elevations showing:
8) An increase in the height of the loading dock screening fence to 6-feet hi
along Frost Avenue. This can b8 accomplished through the use Ofdesign
elements proposed on the arcade/trellis to increase the height and create
more of a screen to the loading dock.
5) G) 7)
b) The proposed northwest patio and entry door on the building elevations.
C) The proposed fence around the healing garden.
d) Roof vents must b8 placed on the `west side nf the roof if possible. All n}
vents must blend into the roofline with compatible colors.
Waters
Building material samples show
"
power point presentation presented
during the July 24 2007, meeting.
�m8 for the project as shown onthe
mmunity Design Review Board
Enter into 8d eveloper's
all public improvements surroundin(
the city which will cover the installation of
within the oroDertv.
8) Sign a maintenance agreement for the ongoing maintenance of all required
rainwater gardens and infiltration basins.
AA A cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior
driveways improvements, The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work.
mplete the following before occupying the building:
1 ) Replace any property irons removed because of this construction.
2) Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and
3) Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all
landscaped areas.
4\ Install all required outdoor lighting.
5) Install all required sidewalks and trails.
The lighting and ohOtnmethCS plan iG not approved. The applicant must submit 8revised
lighting and ph0t0DlBthcS plan for c0D1DlUDitv des review board 8ppn3v@| which
complies with city code and is compatible with the Phase | Gladstone public
|nnpn}Yernent8.
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting
11
e. Gi nage is not approved. The applicant must submit 8 sign plan for community desi
review board approval. The plan must show a monument sign tnbe located atthe
intersection of Frost Avenue and East Shore Drive which announces the entryway to the
Gladstone Neighborhood and any exterior SigD8g8 advertising the Shores.
L8OdSC8 replace DlSnt/3hO[8| and screening plan iS not approved. The applicant
must submit a revised landscape/tree replacement/shoreland screening plans show
1\ Detail of south elevation from the center of Lake Phalen showing compliance with
ShVne|8nd screening requirements (code requires that the building b88t least 8O
percent screened from the |8kR).
2\ Tree preservation plan shall maximize preservation of the significant/specimen
trees on the site.
3\ Landscape plan which shows:
@\ Additional plantings in front of the loading dock.
bA The locat Of all proposed ground mechanical units which are screened
by landscaping.
C) The installation of underground irrigation for the landscaped 8re8s. The
applicant should explore the Df conservation sensor sprinkler devices
which will shut off when it is raining.���
4) Rainwater garden plantings based on any grading changes. Rainwater gardens to
be reviewed and approved bv the city naturalist prior k} issuance of abUi|ding
permit.
9- If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
1\ The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
2\ The above-required letter of credit orcash escrow is held by the City of
Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall
o0nnp|eLe any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if
OCCVp8nCy of the building is in the f8|| Vr winter Orwithin six weeks of occupancy of
the building if occupancy iSiO the spring O[summer.
h. All work shall follow the approved o|8DS. City staff may approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes — All
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting 12
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adjourn the meeting at 11:07 p.m.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle.
The city council meeting will resume
Consent Agenda.
Ayes — Mayor Longrie,
Councilmember's Hjelle, Juenemann,
Rossbach
Nay — Councilmember Cave
August 13, 2007, City Council Meeting
beginning with the
13
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
5:00 p.m., Thursday, August 16, 2007
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 07-014
A. CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order
at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Longrie. This meeting is a continuation of the City Council Meeting
Monday, August 13, 2007.
B. ROLL CALL
Diana Longrie, Mayor Present
Rebecca Cave, Councilmember Present
Erik Hjelle, Councilmember Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present
C. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt consent agenda items 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes- All
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
biar Cave. Ayes- Al I
cilmember Juenemann moved to adopt consent agenda item 7.
ided by Councilmember Cave. Ayes- All I
Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt consent agenda item 11.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes- All I
Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt consent agenda item 13.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes- All I
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 1
1. Approval of Claims.
Councilmember Juenemann moved Approval of Claims.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 103,104.17 Checks #73157 thru #73195
Dated 07/17/07 thru 07/24/07
317,072.09 Disbursements via debits to checki
Dated 07/13/07 thru 07/19/07
$ 713,718.31 Checks #73196 thru #73265
Dated 07/20/07 thru 07/31/07
$ 124,327.88 Disbursements via debits to checking a
Dated 07/20/07 thru 07/26/07
356,993.54 Checks #73266 thru #73311
#REF!
4,521,704.14 GRAND TOTAL
Seconded by Councilmember
Ayes - All
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 2
Dated 07/31/07 thru 08/07/07
$
2,325,301.62
Disbursements via debits to checking account
Dated 07/27/07 thru 08/01/07
$
3,940,517.61
Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$
578,561.60
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 07/27/07
$
2,624.93
Payroll Deduction check #1002713 thru #1002715
Dated 07/27/07
$
581,186.53
Total Payroll
4,521,704.14 GRAND TOTAL
Seconded by Councilmember
Ayes - All
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 2
2. Donation to Maplewood Police Reserves.
Councilmember Juenemann moved ADDroval of the Donation to Maplewood Police Reserves.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle.
Ayes - All
3. Authorization to sign Sprint Agreement for Installation of Signal Amplifying Equipment.
It is recommended that authorization be given to sign the Sprint agreement for the installation of
signal amplifying equipment.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve Authorization to sign Spring Agreement for
Installation of Signal Amplifying Equipment.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes - All
4. Authorization to Pay Sprint/Nextel Bil
It is recommended that authorization be given to pay the
the amount of $5,396.18 and authorize all future paymer
Councilmember Hjelle
Seconded by Councilmember Cave. Ayes -
5. Authorization to Purchase Insurance Agent Servi
extel July 13, 2007, invoice in
it specific City Council action.
Authorization is requested to purchase insurance agent services from Arthur J. Gallagher and
Company at a cost of $9,350.00. This company is needed for the renewal of the city's property
and liability insurance coverage that is with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust.
ded by Councilmember Cave. Ayes - All
6. Resolution Accepting Election Judges for the September 11, 2007, Primary Election.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve accepting Election Judges for the September 11,
2007, Primary Election.
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 3
RESOLUTION 07-08-135 ACCEPTING ELECTION JUDGES
RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of Election
Judges for the 2007 Municipal Primary Election, to be held on Tuesday, September 11, 2007.
Jeanne Bortz
Mary Boyd
Ann Marie Breidenstein
Joanne Brown
JennetbaBunde
Joan Button
James Byers
Luoi||eCohanee
JoyoeCarbnrne
Jeanette Carle
Robert Carr
Ann Cleland
Debra Cohn Madson
Thomas Connelly
Colleen Connolly
Jason Cooper
Marianne Davidson
EdwandOeeg
LoneoOempoay
Maria Deshler
Pheoi||oDeVaau
Judy Dicks
Helen Jean Dickson
OianeOroogar
Fred DuCharme
Audrey Duellman
Carolyn Eickhoff
Elizabeth Erickson
Ann Fallon
Lorraine Fischer
Mary Fischer
Delores Fitzcjerald
Roy Gunther
Rosie Guthrie
OonitaHaock
Lisa Hos|eda|en
Kathryn Nst|eehad
Lloyd Hecht
Gordon Heininger
Barb Hilliard
Constance Hines
Gory0nnenkonnp
Mary Ho|zemer
ShideeHnrton
JaanattaHu|et
Marie Hunt
Lynn Huntoon "
Mildred Iversen
Gwendolyn Jefferson
Chris Jenkins
Judith Johannessen
Barbara Johnson
Carmen Johnson
Joyce Jurmu
Harold Kirchoff
Rosemary Kliever
Rosemary Koch
Julie Kohuth
Joan Kolasa
Dennis Kramer
Kroll
phineKrominga
, ella Lackner
Claudette Leonard
SteveLinnnweki
ViLinnoweki
Jackie Lockwood
Audrey Lodge
Delores Lofgron
RinhardLofgron
Dar|oneLn|porsbonk
Shari Lowe-Adams
Rebecca Lund
Robert LumdOron
eNahowald
Mahra �
Delores Marsh
Thomas Maskrey
Sharon McGinnis
Geraldine Meche
JoonMisgen ~
Betty Mossong
Gerry Muraski
Tina Nguyen
James Nieman
Louise Nieters
Helen Nissen
AmnNorberg
D. William (
O'Brien
Lois Olson
Kenneth Paddock
David Peh|
Mike Popham
VViUiamPhofer
Karla Radennaoher
Carol Roller
Holly Rome
Fran Rongstad
Charles Rowe
ElaimaRudeen
James Sanford
Pau|ineGathann
Elmer Sauer
Kathleen Sauer
Deborah Schmidt
K4aryAnn8ohneider
HorrietGohpnepfor
Louise Schultz
VV|Uiann Schulze
Ananth Shankor
Bob Spangler
Louis Spies
Tim Staf i
Pam Stephanie
Sandra Stevens
Mary Storm
Lorraine Taylor
Rita Taylor
Jean Theieoan
Leila Tillman
Franklin Tolbert
Oa|eTripp|ar
Cecilia Tucker
Connie Unger
Holly Urbaneki
VVi||iann Urbanski
Beulah VanQ|arioonn
KathyVanderPn||
K4oryVanek
Jeremy Vargas-Mulcahy
K4oryVatne
Phy||isVo|kmon
GeneVVandemee
GoryVVaennundt
Goy|eVVaennundt
John Willy
De|oresVVitsohon
Karen Zaoho
Scott Zoger
CourtneyZueroher
W1aggieZuercher
Fosburgh
3 Franzen
oFreer
io Fry
.3oines
Diane Golaski
Betty Granger
Jamie Gudkn(
Jaclynn Gunn
unariOtte Lampe
Anita Larson
Lorraine Lauren
Donna Lawrence
Barbara Leiter
Ann Leo
Pati Leo
Seconded bvC0UDd|0e0b8[HieUe.
Aven — A]|
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting
Ell
7. Chili's Restaurant Fund Raiser for St. Jude's Children's Research — Fee Waiver.
Mr. Mongoven has requested that the $200 fee be waived since this is a fund raising event for St.
Jude's.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Chili's Restaurant Fund Raiser for St. Jude's
Children's Research — Fee Waiver.
Seconded by Councilmember Cave. Ayes - All
8. St. Jerome's Temporary Gambling Resolution and Fee Waivers.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the St. Jei
and Fee Waivers.
TEMPORARY GAMBLING RESOLUTION 07-08-1
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that
the temporary gambling permit for lawful gambling is approved for the Church of St.
Jerome's, 380 E. Roselawn Avenue, to be used on September 16, 2007.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the
timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling
Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit
application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City
Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division
for their approval.
As required, a certificate of coverage for liquor liability insurance from Catholic
Mutual with an endorsement protecting the City was required and received.
On behalf of St. Jerome's, Mr. McCauley is requesting that the fees for the event be
waived as have been in prior years.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes — All
9. Conditional Use Permit Review — Liberty Classical Academy — 2696 — 2730
Hazelwood Street.
It is recommended that the Conditional Use Permit Review for Liberty Classical Academy at 2696
— 2730 Hazelwood Street to be reviewed again in one year.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit Review — Lib
Classical Academy at 2696 and 2730 Hazelwood Street.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes — All
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 5
10. Authorize Purchase of Manhole Castings and Covers for City Project 07-01,
Brookview Area Street Improvements.
It is recommended that the city council approve the purchase of manhole castings and covers
from ESS Brothers Inc. in the amount of $19,446.90.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Authorization to Purchase Manhole Castings
and Covers for City Project 07-01, Brookview Area Street Improvements.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes - All
11. Approve Storm Water Maintenance Agreement for Walgreen's at Rice and
Larpenteur City Project 06-23.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to a
Walareen's at Rice and Lamenteur Citv
MAINTENANCE A
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered intc
by and between the City of Maplewood, a municipa
ENT
Minnesota (hereinafter called "City"), and Rice-1 7, L.L.C.,
(hereinafter called "Landowner").
Witnesses
Purpose. The City has determined that it is
purposes and goals to
described herein as fol
St. Aubin and C
Minnesota Subj
Alleys Accruing
lity
the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement for
day of August 2007,
the laws of the State of
scent with the City's plans, regulations,
tection system for the property
ibit A attached hereto:
s Rice Street Addition to the City of St. Paul, Ramsey Co.,
to Road and Water Works Right-of-Way, Vacated Street and
I For Lots 1 Thru 9 and Lots 17 Thru 25 Blk 8.
It is understood that the Landowner shall be responsible for installing one (1)
VortSentry Underground Hydrodynamic Storm Water Treatment Unit ("Treatment Unit")
as shown on Exhibit 1, as well as the one (1) Underground Storm Water Retention
System ("Retention System"), and one (1) EcoStorm Underground Hydrodynamic Storm
Water Filtration Unit ("Filtration Unit") as shown on Exhibit 2 attached hereto, and the
owners from time to time of the Property (the "Owners") shall be responsible for the cost
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 6
8GSOC8t8d with D18iDt8iOiOg the storm water filtration unit, retSOLk}D avatoD1 and
tne8trn8nL Unit. U is further understood that the {}vvnerS Sh8U also be responsible for the
regular cleaning and maintenance Cf the filtration unit and treatment unit to insure full
working capacity Of each treatment measure.
It is understood between the parties that the City shall not be responsible for the
initial cost Of installing the Treatment Unit, Filtration Unit and Retention System. This
shall be the sole responsibility Cf the Landowner and Owners.
1. Responsibilities ofthe Parties.
8) The Landowner shall beresponsible for any costs related tothe
installation of the storm water Filtration Unit, Treatment Unit and
Retention System.
b\ The Owners shall be responsible hJ
maintenance of the storm water Filtration Unit, Retention System and
Treatment Unit.
` The Owner shall provide to the City an annual ' inspection '_ report of the
maintenance work. City and/or Capital Regions Watershed
District ("Watershed District") may, from time to time inspect the site to
determine whether or not the storm water Filtration Unit, Retention
System, and Treatment Unit are being maintained and operating
_
3. Right of Access. The Landowner hereby grants to the City and the
Watershed District the right to enter onto the property to inspect and monitor the
Filtration Unit, Retention System and Treatment Unit. |Dthe event the City O[Watershed
requires repairs or maintenance tD the storm water Filtration Unit. Retention System or
Treatment Unit, the Owner shall have thirty (3O) days in which 1V make said repairs and
maintenance. |f the Owner fails t0 make said repairs and maintenance within thirty /30\
days after receiving said notice from the City, they shall grant the City the right to enter
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 7
on the property to make any repairs and maintenance necessary to make the Filtration
Unit, Retention System and Treatment Unit operate to their full capacity. The Owner
shall be responsible b3 the City for any and all fees and costs associated with said
maintenance and repairs. Any maintenance or repair activities conducted by the City
shall be conducted ina way ao[o not block access tO the property or disrupt the
operations Of the property and its business, except 83 minimally necessary t0make
repairs.
4. Warranty of Ownership. Landowner hereby warrants and represents tnthe
City, 8Sinducement to the City to enter into this ent, that Landowner's interest in
the property is@Sfee ovvn8c
Landowner warrants that he/she has the right and authority to enter into said Agreement.
5. Binding Effect. The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be binding
on all heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be
binding on all owners from time to time of all or any part of the Property and shall be
deemed covenants running with the land. References herein to Owners, if there be
more than one, shall mean all of them. This Agreement, at the option of the City, shall
be placed of record so as to give notice thereof to subsequent purchasers and
encumbrancers of all or any part of the Property.
Landowner hereby consents to the recording of this Agreement with the Ramsey
County Recorder.
6. Notices. Whenever it shall be required or permitted by this Agreement that
notice or demand be given or served by either party to or0lthe other party, such notice
0[ demand shall b8 delivered personally 0[ mailed hv United States mail bJthe
addresses hereinafter set forth by certified mail. Such notice or demand shall bedeemed
timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with
the above. The addresses Of the parties hereto for such mail purposes are 8Sfollows,
until written notice Df such address has been given:
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 8
As to the City:
/\3b3 the Landowner:
City of Maplewood
1902 County Road BEast
Maplewood, MN 55109
Rice-17, L.L.C.
O01 Marquette Ave. S
Suite 100
Minneapolis, MN554O2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and La
executed OD the day and year first above
have caused this Agreement to be duly
Rice-17, LL'C.
TITLE
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting
STATE {JFMINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before n1ethis
2007 b , the
Notary Public
STATE {JFMINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
day of I
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this, day of .
2O07bv Diana Longh8, Mayor of the City Cf Maplewood, 8 Minnesota municipal corporation.
Notary Public
Greg Copeland, City Manager
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 10
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this, day of .
2O07bv Greg Copeland, City Manager Cf the City of Maplewood, @ Minnesota municipal
Notary Public
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle.
�
Ayes - All
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting
11
12. Desoto Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06-16, Approve Doug
Jones Parking Bay Agreement and Assessment Hearing Waiver.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Desoto Skillman Area Street Improvements,
City Project 06-16, Approving Doug Jones Parking Bay Agreement and Assessment Hearing
Waiver.
AGREEMENT
This Agreement, dated the 16th day of August 2007, is between the City of Maplewood,
a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and North Maplewood Townhomes, LLC,
a Minnesota limited liability company.
WHEREAS, the City is undertaking projects known as Desoto Skillman Area Street
Improvement, Project Number 06-16;
WHEREAS, North Maplewood Town
described by address and property identificati(
I LLC owns property in the Project Area,
bers as:
2019 Desoto: PIN
— 172922230001
2007 Desoto: PIN
— 172922230002
1993 Desoto: PIN
— 172922230003
1997 Desoto: PIN
- 172922230093
1994 Clark: PIN —
172922230006
2008 Clark: PIN —
172922230007
2020 Clark: PIN —
172922230008
2025 Clark: PIN --
172922230009
2011 Clark: PIN —
172922230010
1999 Clark: PIN —
172922230011
1985 Clark: PIN —
172922230012
WHERI
sments.
hearings for the Desoto Skillman Area Street
City and North Maplewood Townhomes, LLC agree to make the
-me]
North Maplewood Townhomes, LLC represents and warrants to the City that:
It has all requisite power and authority to execute this Agreement, and the officer
of North Maplewood Townhomes, LLC who did or will execute the same for and on
behalf of North Maplewood Townhomes, LLC has the power and the authority to
do so and to bind North Maplewood Townhomes.
B. It will act reasonably and exercise due diligence in the performance of the acts
permitted or required under this Agreement.
C. It will cooperate with all reasonable requests by the City related to this
Agreement that do not detrimentally affect the basis of the terms of this
Agreement.
2. North Maplewood Townhomes, LLC shall perform the following:.
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 12
A. Pay to the {|Uv $19,20513 in assessments for sanitary sewer on {||@rk Street and
parking improvements along Nt. Vernon Avenue for the North Maplewood
TOwOhOnleSPpOpertv. The breakdown 0f assessments i3aSfollows:
Sanitary Sewer $ 9.827.98 (Assessed t0 1SO5 Clark Street)
Parking Bays $ 9,437.15 (Assessed to All Properties)
- [ot@| $ 1S
North Maplewood Tovvnhonles L[C has been advised of its right to notice and o public
hearing and right to appeal concerning the assessments proposed against the North
K8ap|evvO0d T0vvOhOOl8S, LLC Property with the 8Dl0UOL t0 be $19.205.13. The
assessments are tob8 paid over @ fifteen /15\ year period 8t@n interest rate ofO%. North
K8@p|evv0od TDvvnhom88, LL(| expressly agrees to waive the notice of hearing, hearing
and its right to appeal said assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081.
8L8|. Minnesota case law supports waiver assessment procedures such 8s the right of
notice and public hearing. In Re Nemzek, 58 N.W.2d 746 (Minn. 1853).
3. Severability. If any term of this Agreement is found to be void or invalid, such invalidity
shall not affect the remaining terms of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force
and effect.
4. Arbitration. It is Re8d by the parties that any differences, dispute or claim which arises
under and pursuant to this Agreement or as to the performance thereof by the parties
hereto shall be submitted for arbitration to a board of arbitrators consisting of three (3)
persons, one selected by the party interested in one side of the dispute, one by the party
interested in the other side of the dispute, and a third person mutually selected and
agreed upon by the first two arbitrators.
Any party shall notify the other party in writing, served by U.S. Mail, certified or registered,
postage prepaid, of a dispute, stating the nature of the claim or dispute and the name and
address of selected arbitrator. The other party shall serve notice of its selected arbitrator
and opposition or other interest in the claim or dispute. The two arbitrators shall select a
third disinterested arbitrator within fifteen (15) days after the response notice stated
Arbitration shall be commenced within forty-five (45) days of the original notice pursuant to
the previous paragraphs hereOf, and all proceedings 3h8U be governed by Minnesota
St8tUtHS, Chapter 572. The decision of any two arbitrators shall be binding and conclusive
with respect to all claims and disputes submitted in such arbitration proceedings.
If 8 party does not respond to an arbitration notice then the party first serving the
arbitration notice under the previous paragraph shall be 8OUUed by MOtk]D to oehtOD 8
court of competent jurisdiction for its order selecting and appointing an arbitrator for said
defaulting party. Any such determination by the CVUU 8h8|| be fin8|, binding and
DODC|ugiv8 83 to all parties in interest. Expenses for the arbitration Sh8|| be divided 8QU@||y
among the parties.
5. The [JUv's and North Maplewood TovvnhonxeS obligations under this Agreement shall be
condUUon8d, for the Sn|8 benefit of the City and North K88p|8wnOd Tovvnhonn8s upon the
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 13
A. Contingent upon review and approval of final terms by the City Council.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement.
NORTH MAPLEWOOD TOWNHOMES, INC CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
By: By:
Date Diana Lonarie Date
Its: Its:
Its:
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting
14
MT. VERNON PARKING BAYS
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
THUS AWGREEK8ENT, made and entered into this 10th day Of August 2007. by and
between the City of M8p|8vv0Od a municipal corporation under the |8vv3 of the State of Minnesota
(hereinafter called ^Cib/'), and North K88p|8vvDod Tovvnhornes LLC 8 limited liability CDnnp8ny'
(hereinafter called "Owner").
1. The City has determined that it is consistent with the City's plans, regulations,
purposes and goals t0 prov parking bays for the follow properties @s indicated bvaddress
and property identification number:
201S Desoto: PIN
—172923230UO1
2OU7 Desoto: PIN
—17292223O002
1983 Desoto: PIN
—1729232300U3
1897 Desoto: PIN
-172822230U83
1094 Clark: PIN —1729222300O5
20O8 Clark: PIN —17293223UO07
3O20 Clark: PIN —1
2025 Clark: PIN — 1
2O11 Clark: PIN —1
109S Clark: PIN —1
1985 Clark: PIN —1
UiSUDd
iDSt@U 3 — p8dd
hereto ("Parkin(
|gible N for financing the cost b3 have the city
the locations shown on Exhibit A attached
bays are located within the City's right Ofway
portion of the parking bays located within the
the parties that the {|hv shall not be responsible for the inUU@|
igOingm8intengOce costs, which shall be the sole responsibility
related to the installation of the
C)
�0
��
e)
The Owner shall poSi the parking bays as No Park for Periods Longer than 24
Hours. The Owner shall b8 responsible for enforcing the 24 hour parking limit.
The Owner shall DOL post or utilize the parking bays for the 8xC|USiv8 use of the
tenants of the properties described above.
The Owner shall be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the parking
bays and for snow removal in the parking bays.
The Owner shall be responsible for the cost of restoring the parking bays in the
CiP:UDl3L@Dc8 that the City must enter OOb3 the Parking Bays for C0OSLnJCLi0D
required in the right of way.
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting
15
fl The City shall b8 responsible for the cost Of repairing damage done b3 the Park
Bays caused bv City vehicles performing routine street maintenance such 88snow
plowing and street sweeping. City vehicles shall not drive on the parking bays.
4. Warranty of Ownership. Owner warrants that it has the ri and authority to enter into
this Agreement.
5. The terms and prov nf this Agreement shall be binding on all heirs,
representat successors and assigns of the parties hereto and Sh8U be binding OO all
Owners from time to time of all or any part of the Property and shall be deemed covenants
running with the land. References herein tV Owner, if there be more than one, shall mean
all of them. This Agreement at the OpU0D of the City. Sh8|| be placed of [eCOnd GO as b3
give notice thereof to subsequent purchasers and encumbrancers of all or any party of the
Property.
Owner hereby consents to the recording Of this Agreement with the Ramsey County
8. Notices. Whenever d shall borequired or permitted by this Agreement that notice or
demand be given or served by either party to or on the other party, such notice Drdemand
Sh8|| be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the 8ddne3G8G hereinafter
set forth by certified mail. Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when
delivered || with the above. The
8UdregSS3 of the parties hereto for such purposes are as follows UOLi| vv[iUBO DOtiC8 of
change of such addresses has accordance herewith:
As to the City: City Of Maplewood
1902 County
Maplewood, MN 55109
As to the Owner: North Maplewood Townhomes, LLC
2505 Silver Lane N.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55421
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Developer have caused this Agreement hobeduly
executed 0n the day and year first above written.
[61TA ki 1:4�
North Maplewood Tovvmhmmmes,LLC
Its
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 16
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 16 th day of August 2007 by
-, the of North Maplewood Townhomes, LLC.
Notary Public
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
wm�• V •
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 16th day of August 2007, by
Diana Longrie, Mayor, of the City of Maplewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation.
Greg Copeland, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA
[C0111 Z I awe] 0 OWT- kyl 6
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 16th day of August 2007, by
Greg Copeland, City Manager, of the City of Maplewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation.
Notary Public
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle.
Ayes - All
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 17
13. Brookview Area Street Improvements, (Noise Berm Maintenance Agreement), City
Project 07-01, Approve Resolution Authorizing Maintenance Agreement with
Mn/DOT.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Brookview Area Street Improvements, (Noise
Berm Maintenance Agreement), City Proiect 07-01, Approving the Resolution Authorizing
Maintenance Agreement with Mn/DOT.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
RESOLUTION 07-08-137
IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter i
State of Minnesota, Department of Transp
To provide Noise Berm Maintenance for the Tf
corporate limits of the City of Maplewood upon
Agreement.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Map
Manager, Greg Copeland are authorized to exeCL
n/DOT Agreement No. 90966 with the
following purposes:
ME
the
Road interchange within the
ditions set forth in the
, Diana Longrie, and the City
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 18
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
City of Maplewood
I certify that the above Resolution is an accurate copy of the Resolution adopted by the City Council of
the City of Maplewood at an authorized meeting held on the day of
2007, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
,2007
Myjam
My Commission Expires
(Signature)
(Type or Print Name)
(Title)
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 19
1 l olm UA
PREPARED BY Mn /DOT
METRO DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO.
MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS 90966
T TT Ppiq
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DE PARTMENT OF RA •��
1
THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD- - - - - --
FOR
Noise Berm Maintenance for the McKnight Rd and TH 94 interchange within the corporate limits
of the City of Maplewood upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State" and the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City ".
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting
NE
WHEREAS, City completed construction of the noise berm within the City limits including
engineered fill, grading, and turf establishment, in accordance with City consultant prepared
plans, specificat and prov for which the construction project had been desi
State Aid Project NO. 138-148-01. 138-149-01; and
WHEREAS, State and City are empowered to enter into agreements pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 471.58;and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 1G1.38, the parties desire toenter
into an agreement relating to the routine maintenance of portions of the noise berm ad Lo
Trunk Highway 94 upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement.
A. City shall provide for the proper mai ntenance
the State. Maintenance shall include i nspection
perpetuate the noise berm in a safe and usable cor
B. The City shall hold the
failure to maintain the,
C. K either party needs t0modify
nnOdUDoatoDs and. if needed. (
D. The State retains its authority to
advertising permits, drainage pE
from an
�
I noise be
N
berm without cost Or expense t0
)n repair necessary kz
claims due to maintenance of or
and City will agree to those
nce agreement.
er, issue, and regulate access permits, si
d permits to install new utilities on trunk highway
The City agrees to maintain the noise berm, without cost ov expense tVthe State, in
cons ideration of the State permitting Cit construction Of the noise berm 0Otrunk
highway right
�ement will be in effect un til superseded bv another agreement between State
or until such time that the noise berm iSremoved.
|\(
A. State's Authorized Representative for the purposes of the administration of this
Agreement is Beverly Farraher, Assistant District Engineer - Maintenance,
Minnesota Department Of Transportation Metro District, 1500 West County Road
B2. Roseville, Minnesota 55113 her successor.
B. The City's Authorized Representative for the purposes [f the administrat Cd
this Agreement i8 R. Ch8rlesAh|. City Engineer, City OfMaplewood, 1830 East
County Road B. Maplewood, PWN5510g his successor.
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 21
C. State's Authorized Representative will have final authority for acceptance of maintenance
services performed by City under this Agreement.
V. ASSIGNMENT
A. No party will assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement, in whole or
in part, without prior written consent of the other.
B. All contracts and agreements made by any party with additional parties for the performance
of any work to be done under this Agreement will be made in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement and comply with State of Minnesota law.
C. This Agreement will not be construed as a relinquishment by State of any powers or
control it may have over the trunk highway covered under this Agreement.
V1. MERGER/AMENDMENTS
This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and City. No
other understanding regarding this agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to
bind either party. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing, and must be
executed by the same parties who executed the original Agreement, or their successors in
office.
VII. LIABILITY
A. The employees and agents of the City will not be deemed to be employees of the State for
any reason.
B. Each party will be solely responsible for its own acts and omissions, the acts and
omissions of its employees, and results thereof to the extent authorized by law. The
parties will not be responsible for the acts of any others and the results thereof.
C. Liability of State will be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736
and liability of City will be governed by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. This clause will
not be construed to bar any legal remedies each party may have for the other party's
failure to fulfill its obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
D. Each party to this Agreement will defend at its sole cost and expense any action or
proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character
arising in connection with or by virtue of performance of its own work as provided herein.
Each party will be solely responsible for its own employees for any workers compensation
claims.
Ix. CIVIL RIGHTS
The City must comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 181.59, and any
applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination.
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 22
X.
STATE AUDITS
The books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the City,
relevant to this Aon8enlert will be subject to examination by the K4n/DC}T/\uditor, the
Legislative Auditor, or the State Auditor, as appropriate, for no |eSS than six years
following the expiration of this Agreement.
In
DATA PRACTICES
The State and the City must comply with the Minnesota Data Practices Act
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.@8k applies k} any provided tDorbv8party
t0 this agreement.
)O|
Before this Agreement will become binding and effective, it must be City of
Maplewood City Council resolution, and be executed and City officers as
provided by law.
|N TESTIMONY WHEREOF the ^ parties h@v8execUhBdLhisAop8ern8ntthn}VghtheirdU|y
authorized officials:
~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
in
ct Engineer — Metro District Maintenance
as
Metro District Authorized Signature
Date
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 23
Date
Authorized Signature
Print Name:
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes - All
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 24
None.
H ki Ul I Z I [A 0 1:1111 - .11RI I Z I
I Approve Retaining Schoell Madson for Finalization of South Maplewood
Land Use Study.
Councilmember Cave moved to approve hiring Schoell Madson at a cost of $14,070.1
Seconded by Mayor Longrie. Ayes -
L. NEW BUSINESS
1. Intoxicating Liquor License — Chao Lee — Nickelby's Ba
a. Karen Guilfbile, City Clerk, Citizen Services Manager, gave the
b. Chao Lee, Oakdale, addressed the council.
Councilmember Cave
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes - All
2. Approve Retaining Schoell Madson to:
a. Update the Parks, Trails and Open Space Element of the Comprehensive Plan in
2007.
City Manager, Greg Copeland recommended tabling this item in order for city staff to do
further historical research regarding the document. City staff will bring this item back to the
city council for review.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to table the Updating of the Parks, Trails and Open
Space Element of the Comprehensive Plan in 2007 in order for city staff to bring further
information back to the city council.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes — All
b. Update Nine Elements of Comprehensive Plan in 2008.
Councilmember Hjelle moved to table Updating Nine Elements of Comprehensive Plan in
2008.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes - All
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 25
3. Crestview Forest Improvements — Deer Ridge Lane — City Project 06-21
a. Public Works Director, Chuck Ahl gave the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to accept the resolution Accepting Project Plans and
Specifications.
RESOLUTION 07-08-138
APPROVING PLANS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on July 9th, 2007,
plans and specifications for the Crestview Forest Improvements, City Project 06-21, have
been prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has presented such
plans and specifications to the council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the
city engineer.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle.
M2
Juenemann
ON
Ayes -- All
-08-139
ASSESSMENT ROLL
-AS, the city engineer will assign day labor for the Crestview Forest
(Deer Ridge Lane), City Project 06-21,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
:)LEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate
proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every
assable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to
'i valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed
E)ssment in the city office for inspection.
FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify
the council thereof.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle.
Ayes -- All
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting
0
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll
and Ordering Assessment Hearing on September 10, 2007.
RESOLUTION 07-08-140
ORDERING ASSESSMENT HEARING
WHEREAS, the clerk and the city engineer have, at the direction of the council,
prepared an assessment roll for the Crestview Forest Improvements (Deer Ridge Lane),
City Project 06-21, and the said assessment roll is on file in the office of the city engineer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
A' !!D MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of September 2007, at the city hall
at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all
persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be
heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The city clerk is hereby directe
proposed assessment to be published in the c
the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners
�Se a notice of the hearing on the
ewspaper, at least two weeks prior to
'operty affected by said assessment.
3. The notice of hearing sl
general nature of the improvement the
assessment roll is on file with the clerk
will be considered.
Councilmember Hjelle.
the date, time and place of hearing, the
e assessed, that the proposed
angineer and that written or oral objections
Ayes — All
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting
27
4. Ferndale Geranium Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-14, Approval of
Budget Adjustment for Sanitary Sewer I and I Improvements.
a. Public Works Director, Chuck AN presented the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Ferndale Geranium Area Street
,Improvements, City Proiect 07-14, Approval of Budget Adiustment for Sanitary Sewer I
and I Improvements.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes — All
5. Lark Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-15, Approval of Budget
Adjustment for Sanitary Sewer Lining of Kenwood Neighborhood.
a. Public Works Director, Chuck AN presented the report.
Councilmember Juenemann
Kenwood Neighborhood.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle. Ayes — All
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
M1. National Night Out — Councilmember Juenemann thanked everyone that was
involved in making National Night Out on August 7, 2007, a success.
M2. Old Gladstone Fire Station Parcel — Mayor Longrie spoke about the old Gladstone
Fire Station Parcel and asked staff if due to the location of this parcel the city had
ever thought of selling this parcel.
M3. City Website Updated — Mayor Longrie said she has received questions from
concerned citizens who have stated they have enjoyed having the packets and
minutes available to view on the city website for the City Council, Planning
Commission, Community Design Review Board and Housing Redevelopment
Authority but have asked why the Park and Recreation Minutes and the
Environmental and Natural Resources Commission do not have any packet
information or minutes available online. Chuck AN said the staff in Public Works is
working on that.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
N1. Dismissal of the Data Practices Case by Nancy Lazarvan. City Attorney, Alan
Kantrud reported on this case.
Mayor Longrie adjourned the meeting at 6:10 p.m.
August 16, 2007, City Council Meeting 28
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Jon Jarosch, Civil Engineer I
SUBJECT: Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements, Project 07-14
1. Assessment Hearing, 7:00 p.m.
2. Approve Resolution for Adoption of Assessment Roll
3. Approve Resolution for Awarding of Bid
DATE: August 27, 2007
All property owners have been mailed a notice of the exact amount of their assessment, as well as notice
that they must submit a written objection either at or prior to the hearing if they disagree with the
assessment amount.
The city council should conduct the assessment hearing, receive any objections, refer those objections to
the staff for action at the September 10, 2007 council meeting and consider approving the attached
resolution adopting the assessment roll without the property owners who have submitted objections. It
should be noted that the assessment roll currently proposed for adoption has changed from the
assessment roll accepted on July 23 These changes are highlighted in this report.
Final plans and specifications for the Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements were approved by the
city council on July 23 2007, and authorization was given to advertise for bids. Those bids were received
and subsequently opened on Wednesday August 22 2007. The city council should also consider
approving the attached resolution approving the award of bid following the assessment hearing and the
adoption of the assessment roll.
The city council ordered the preparation of the feasibility study at the June 11 2007 regular meeting. On
July 9 2007 the city council accepted the feasibility report and ordered the public hearing.
Street improvements for this neighborhood were listed on the city's capital improvements project plan for
2008 but the city council is now considering the project for 2007. The project involves the complete
reconstruction of approximately 1.2 miles of residential streets and affects approximately 128 properties.
The majority of streets in the project area have existing concrete curb that may only be partially
reconstructed depending on the required utility work and existing curb condition. The section of Geranium
Avenue between Ferndale and Century has no existing curb. This section is proposed to utilize a full
barrier curb and gutter street design. The rainwater garden program and driveway replacement program
will be utilized for this project. Storm sewer improvements along with sanitary sewer repairs are proposed.
Watermain is proposed to be installed along Geranium Avenue between Ferndale and Century, including
service lines, gate valves, and hydrants.
A neighborhood meeting was held on July 1 9th ,2OO7 to discuss the proposed project with residents. At this
meet the residents were provided with on overview Of the proposed project 8ndthe3tneetr8COnStruotion
process. They were also given the opportunity tV ask any questions they had regarding the project.
The proposed project schedule anticipates construction beginning as early as Se 2007and
completion of the project in November of 2007.
Only costs related to the street improvements are proposed hnbe assessed and are not directly dependent
on the actual amount of the bid, rather on a predetermined assessment rate established in the city's
pavement management policy. The method Vf assessment is the same as was outlined in the feasibility
study. The pnOp0SSd assessments will be for costs relating to the street and utility improvements to the
benefiting properties abutting the project Gtr88Ls. The assessments for the street and storm are shown
below. The assessment rate for new watermain, currently being proposed along Geranium Avenue east of
Fernd8|e, iS also shown below.
Residential Rates:
* $4 /unit for full street reconstruct (adding 0r replacing curb &gutbeh.
° $3,700 /unit for partial street reCVnGinJ[tk]n (utilizing existing curb & gutter).
* $4,1U0 /unit for new vvatenn8in insL8||8UOn
* $820 /unit for storm sewer assessment.
COmrD8[Cka| Or k8UKiF@nlik/ Rates:
~ $99.20 /Front Ft. for full street reconstruction (adding or replacing curb & gutter).
~ $74.00 /Front FL for podio| street r9cODstRJCd0n (utilizing exist curb & gutt
* $184O/Fnont Ft. for storm sewer assessment.
The total amount proposed LVb8 assessed iS$538.2Y8.0U.
Award of Bid
u
<�ODtr@CtOr bids were [GCGiv8d and publicly F8od o|OUd at 10:00 a.m., on Wednesday, August 22 n. 2007.
The following eleven bids were received and read G|OUd as follows:
All bids have been checked and tabulated. The engineer's estimate for the project vv8s $1,757,137.00 for
the Base Bid and $1 for the Base Bid + Alternate A. The low bid from T.A`SChifSkv and Sons
Inc. of $1.4Y5.829.18 for the Base Bid + Alternate A|s about 24% less than the engineer's construction
Contractor
Base Bid
Base + Alt. A
1\
T��SnhKskv and Sono.|no.
$1.263.127.17
$1/475.929.10
2\
Danner Inc.
$1.301.082.90
$1.562.182.77
3\
||8rdhv8S|DC.
$1/417,235.38
$1
4)
Arnt Construction
$1.421
$1.573
5\
Tower Asphalt Inc.
$1.450
$1.870
G\
FnaU8|0n8Co.
$1.443.488.42
$1.680.500.92
Y\
MaxGt8ining9r
$1.581.813.23
$1.785.101.43
8)
P@|dG and Sons
$1
$1
9)
Forest Lake Contracting
$1
$1
10\Arcon{|onstnJtLi0n
$1.831
$1.899
11) Park Construction
$1.780.290.87
$2.022.508.27
All bids have been checked and tabulated. The engineer's estimate for the project vv8s $1,757,137.00 for
the Base Bid and $1 for the Base Bid + Alternate A. The low bid from T.A`SChifSkv and Sons
Inc. of $1.4Y5.829.18 for the Base Bid + Alternate A|s about 24% less than the engineer's construction
cost estimate. The city has worked successfully with T.A. Schifskv and Sons Inc. in the past; most recently
being On the Desoto-Skillman Street Improvements, City Project 06-16.
Changes toAssessment RmUi
As was stated eGdi8�changes to the 8sSRsSnn8nLnd|accepted 8t the July 2v CoVn�|nleeUngvvRn8
necessary. The maj of these changes relate k) the discov that the most oJ the properties along
Geranium Avenue were previously assessed for storm sewer. The changes are highlighted below.
1. 1122 Ferndale StmmmtN — Chongadbokwoneaidentio|unitahomonndueLothnobi|ityhzr
the lot tobe split /+$3.7OU\;also added fees for sanitary and water service extensions to
proposed lot-split /+$S,400\. Total Assessment changed from $3,700t0$18.88O.
2. 256J Geranium Avenue E — ChanQedLohworaeidantia|uniLnfromoneduatnLhaunit
being o duplex /+$3 Total assessment changed from $3.YO0to$7.4OO.
3. 2627 Stillwater Road — Changedfrorn o full street reconstruction rate to o podio| street
reconstruction rate (-$5.394.4O). Total assessment changed from $21.5284OtO$18.132.
4. 2637 Stillwater Road — Changed from G full street reconstruction rate to @ partial street
reconstruction rate (-$2 Total assessment changed from $1O
5. 2637,2638.2645,2648(2),2666,2674,2682,268J,2691.2692.2700,2701. and 2707
Geranium Avenue, - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of previous
payment of8 storm sewer assessment /-$820.U0\. Total assessment changed from $S.88U
to $9,060.
0. 2657 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due t0 record Of
previous payment of8 storm sewer assessment ('$2.400.00). Total assessment changed
from $2S.840k}$27.180.
The assessment statements that were mailed to the residents already reflect the changes shown above.
The total amount b3bR assessed was subsequently reduced from $541.127.2Oho$530
parcels and the changes Lo their assessments are listed in the attached resolution individually.
Assessment Objections Filed
1. As of August 22, 2007 staff has received the following objections to the proposed assessments:
8. Parcel 252S22130085— Richard and Virginia VV8inho|d;2815 Stillwater Road
Mr. and Mrs. Weinhold object to the assessment based upon a senior citizen financial
hardship.
b. Parcel 252022120O1S- John NickO|GUS and Keith Johnson; 114OEv8rStreet
Mr. Nickolaus and Mr. Johnson object to the assessment based upon financial hardship.
Staff will review all objections and provide the city council recommendations for motion at the September
1 oth , 2007 city council meeting.
The proposed assessments are part Ofthe project financing plan, approved in July 0f2007. Any
assessments that may ultimately be reduced Vrdeferred will have an impact Vn the tax levy. Astatement
Of tax levy impact will b8 made for the September 1O"' council meeting when all the assessments
objections and recommendations are considered.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached Resolutions for the Adoption of the
Assessment Roll and Award of Bids for Ferndale- Geranium Area Street Improvements, City Project 07 -14.
Attachments:
1, Resolution: Adoption of the Assessment Roll
2. Resolution: Award of Bid
3. Assessment Roll
4. Location Map
5. objection Letters
RESOLUTION
ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant Noresolution adopted by the City Council on July 23oL2O07. calling for uPublic
the assessment roll for the Area Sincct Improvements, City Project 07-14, was presented
ion Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,and
WHEREAS, due to clerical errors in the previously accepted assessment roll, the following changes were
necessary, and the assessment roll shall be amended as follows:
l. Parcel UD252922|1O033-1i22Ferndale SbeetN — C io two residential units from one due Vothe
ability for the lot to be split (+$3,70N;also added fees for sanitary and water service extensions Wproposed
(+$9,460). Total Assessment changed from $3,700 to $10,860.
2. Parcel lD25292212O18X-25h3Geranium Avenue E— Changed to two residential units from one due 1othe
unit being u duplex (+$3,7UO). Total assessment changed from $3,70Otp $7,400.
3. Parcel ID 252922140001 — 2627 Stillwater Road — Changed fi a full street reconstruction rate to a partial
street reconstruction rate (-$5,394.40). Total assessment changed from $21,526.40to$l6,|32.
4. Parcel ID 252922110035 — 2637 Stillwater Road — Changed from a full street reconstruction rate to a partial
street reconstruction rate (-$2,37h.8U). Total assessment changed from $|0,8|2.8Uto$8
5. Parcel ID 252922110031 — 2638 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of
previous payment ofus|000 sewer assessment (-$82O.O[). Total assessment changed from $9,880|o $9,060.
6. Parcel ID252922ll002Y-2648 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record ot
previous payment ofustorm sewer assessment (-$820.UO). Total oomcmmoncut changed from $9,880 to $9,060.
7. Parcel ID 252922110030 — 2648 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of
previous payment o[ustorm sewer assessment <-$82U.U[A. Total aoacoaozcnt changed from $9,880 to $9,060.
D. Parcel ID 252922110016 — 2637 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of
previous payment o[uaioon sewer assessment /-$02O.O[A. Total assessment changed from $9,800io $9,060.
9. Parcel l[)252922l1O0|7-2645 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due iu record o[
previous payment ofustorm sewer assessment <482O.UO>. Total ooa0000ncot changed from $9 0n $9
|U. Parcel UO2529221lOU|8-2657 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of
previous payment m[o storm sewer assessment (-$2 Total assessment changed from $29,64U to
$27,180.
ll. Parcel ID252922llO02O-2666 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due iu record o[
previous payment otu storm sewer assessment (-$X2U.00). Total assessment changed from $Y"0X0to $9"060.
12. Parcel ID 252922110027 — 2674 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of
previous payment m[ostorm sewer assessment <-$820.00A. Total uuacuaozcnt changed from $9 10 $9
13. Parcel D0252922llUO26-2682 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due \m record o[
previous payment ofus|000 sewer assessment (482O.O[). Total assessment changed from $9,880|o $9,060.
14. Parcel ID252922ll00|Y-268] Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record ot
previous payment ofustorm sewer assessment (4820.UO). Total oomcmmoncut changed from $9,880 to $9,060.
15, Parcel ID 252922110020 — 2691 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of
previous payment o[ustorm sewer assessment <-$82U.U[A. Total aoacoaozcnt changed from $9,880 to $9,060.
16. Parcel ID 252922110025 — 2692 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of
previous payment o[uaioon sewer assessment /-$02O.O[A. Total assessment changed from $9,800io $9,060.
17. Parcel l[)252922l1O024-270O Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due iu record o[
previous payment ofustorm sewer assessment 00>. Total ooa000mcot changed from $9,880 0n $9,060.
18. Parcel ID 252922110021 — 2701 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of
previous payment m[ostorm sewer assessment (-$820.0[). Total uuacuaozcnt changed from $9 10 $9
19. Parcel ID 252922110060 — 2707 Geranium Avenue - Removed the Storm Sewer Assessment due to record of
previous payment o[u storm sewer assessment (-$820.0C). Total oosemsuzoni changed from $Y,Q8800 $9,060.
And, WHEREAS, the following property owners have filed objections tu their assessments according to the
requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized uofollows:
u Parcel 252922l3UOh5— Richard and Virginia Wcbnbokt2hl5 Stillwater Road
Mr. and Mrs. Weinhold object to the assessment based upon a senior citizen financial hardship.
b. Parcel 252922l200/6— John Nbokokxm and Keith Johnson; ll46EvurStreet
Mr. Niokobus and Mr. Johnson object to the assessment based upon financial hardship.
NOW THEREFORE, DE[I RESOLVED Bl, THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
l. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed tu review the objections received and report to
the City Council at the regular meeting on September l0,2007,asWtheir recommendations for adjustments.
2. The assessment roll for the Area Street Improvements as amended, without those property
owners' assessments that have filed objections, ncopy of which io attached hereto and made upart hereof, is
hereby adopted. Said assessment roll shall constitute the special uoacaumeul against the lands named therein,
and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the
amount of the assessment levied against it.
3. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual bzmkalhncoim extending over u period ofl5 years, the first
installments lobc payable onmr before the first in January 2OU8 and shall bear interest u{ the rate of
0.0 percent per unounn for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. Tothe fimlinstallment shall
be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2007. To each
subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
4. The owner of any property m assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment m the county
auditor, but no later than October l, 2007, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest
accrued to the date of the payment, to the city clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment im paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they nuuy o1 any time uUcr
October 1, 2007, pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued \o December 3l of the year iu which such payment immade. Such payment must bcmade
before November l5or interest will be charged through December 3l of the next succeeding year.
5. The city and city clerk shall forthwith after October 1, 2007, but no later than November 15, 2007,
transmit ucertified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor toie extended oo the property tax lists
of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over the same manner usother municipal taxes.
Adopted hv the council onthis 27 1u day oi August 2007.
RESOLUTION
AWARD OF BIDS
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the
bid of T.A. Schifsky and Sons Inc., in the amount of $1,475,929.16 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction
of Ferndale- Geranium Area Street Improvements —City Project 07-14, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized
and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city.
The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing
plan for the project.
Adopted by the council on this 27 day of August 2007.
N
August 23, 2007
Re: City of Maplewood
Ferndale-Geranium Area Street Improvements
City Project No. 07-14
SEH No. A-MAPLE071 1.00
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Maplewood
1830 E. Co. Rd. B
Maplewood, MN 55109
On Wednesday, August 22, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., 11 bids were received for the referenced project. A
summary is shown below in order of Base Bid plus Alternate A. The bid tabulation is enclosed.
Contractor Base Bid Alt. A Base Bid Plus Alt. A
1
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc.
$1,263,127.17
$212,801.99
$1,475,929.16
2
Arnt Construction
$1,421,256.04
$152,226.00
$1,573,482.04
3
Danner Inc.
$1,391,062.96
$171,119.81
$1,562,182.77
4
Tower Asphalt I nc.
$1,450,571.90
$220,075.20
$1,670,647.10
5
Hardrives Inc.
$1,417,235.36
$203,840.02
$1,621,075.38
6
Max Steininger Inc.
$1,561,613.23
$223,488.20
$1,785,101.43
7
Frattalone Co. Inc.
$1,443,488.42
$247,072.50
$1,690,560.92
8
PaIda and Sons Inc.
$1,565,875.41
$189,597.00
$1,755,472.41
9
Forest Lake Contracting Inc.
$1,577,260.77
$189,699.29
$1,766,960.06
10
Arcon Construction
$1,631,961.24
$267,965.25
$1,899,926.49
11
1 Park Construction
$1,780,290.87
$242,217.40
$2,022,508.27
Engineer's Estimate $1,757,137.05 $178,673.00 $1,935,810.05
Based on the Base Bid plus Alternate A, the low bid received was submitted by T.A. Schifsky & Sons,
Inc., of North St. Paul, Minnesota in the amount of $1,475,929.16.
This contractor has worked in the City of Maplewood on projects of various sizes. SEH engineers can
conclude that T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. has the experience and ability to complete a project of this size.
Accordingly, we recommend the project be awarded to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. in the amount of
$1,475,929.16, based on their Base Bid plus Alternates A, which compares favorably with the engineer's
estimate shown above.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
9 4�
Steven F. Heth, PE
Project Manager
Enclosure
A
',1Sp3020 -7 \projects�KO'M' 100\Repor(s&SpecsTemda1e Geranium SpecsVecawardlmdoc
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-5196
SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 651.490.2000 1 800.325.2055 1 651.490.2150 fax
FERNDALE - GERANIUM AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT INFORMATION CITY PROJECT 07 -14
PARCEL ID
TAXPAYER
STREET
NUMBER
STREET
RESIDENTIAL
UNITS
COMMERCIAL
FRONT
FOOTAGE
MULTI - FAMILY
FRONT
FOOTAGE
STORM
ASSESSMENT'
WATERMAIN
ASSESSMENT
STREET
ASSESSMENT
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
252922110052
2728 GERANIUM
0
CENTURY AVE N
350
$5,740.00
$34,720.00
$40,460.00
252922120016
JOHN D NICKOLAUS
1146
EVAR ST
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120015
TAMARA J WESTPHALL
1142
EVAR ST N
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120046
GARY E ERICKSON
1144
EVAR ST N
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120071
SAMUEL A RIVARD
1147
EVAR ST N
28
NiA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120045
DOLORES C MCCORMICK TRUSTEE
1148
EVAR ST N
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120070
DOLORES L REESE
1149
EVAR ST N
23
NIA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120017
TERRI J DAVIS
1152
EVAR ST N
30
N/A
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120044
SUZANNE H ODONNELL
1154
EVAR ST N
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120018
ROY E GINN
1156
EVAR ST N
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120043
MARIANNE DAVIDSON
1158
EVAR ST N
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120019
ESTER KATHLEEN QUINLEY
1162
EVAR ST N
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120042
JMW INVESTMENTS LLC
1164
EVAR ST N
30
NiA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120020
FRED M GORKA
1166
EVAR ST N
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120041
NADIA KAMARA LEWIS
1168
EVAR ST N
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120086
THOMAS M WIND
1127
FERNDALE AVE
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120001
JEFF J MCCLURE
0
FERNDALE ST N
NIA
$0.00
252922130066
ANDREW J BLOOMQUIST
0
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120118
JAMES F WEINGARTZ
1091
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700 -00
$3,700.00
252922120117
ROBERT E WARN
1101
FERNDALE ST N
1
NiA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922110061
JOHN C CAPISTRANT
1106
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120116
THOMAS G MUELLNER SR
1111
FERNDALE ST N
50
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922110054
TRACY K ROY
1112
FERNDALE ST N
1
N/A
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120115
THOMAS G MUELLNER SR
1113
FERNDALE ST N
50
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922110033
MIKE SELLERS
1122
FERNDALE ST N
2
NIA
$9460.00
$7,400.00
$16,860.00
252922110032
KENNETH H DUROSE
1124
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700 -00
$3,700.00
252922120176
BRUCE D JOHNSON
1133
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120175
BRANDON L GARZA
1139
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252 92212 01 74
JOSEPH A HAINES
1145
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120173
DAVID C BAHL
1151
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922110014
BRION A BOHN
1156
FERNDALE ST N
1
NiA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120172
ROBERT P DAAS
1157
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120171
EILEEN M ANZALDI
1165
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922110013
RONALD BRYAN SUITER
1168
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922110012
GABRIEL PEREZ RESENDEZ
1180
FERNDALE ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922110011
THOMAS CHUE TONG LOR
1184
FERNDALE ST N
1
NiA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922110031
NELSON J GEBBEN
2638
GERANIUM AVE
1
NIA
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110029
LAWRENCE R SCHULER
2648
GERANIUM AVE
1
NIA
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110030
LAWRENCE R SCHULER
2648
GERANIUM AVE
1
N/A
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922120159
JOSHUA S RINKE
2504
GERANIUM AVE E
37
NIA
$2,738.00
$2,738.00
252922120064
ROBERT O WELTY
2505
GERANIUM AVE E
28
NIA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120158
ANN M BOETTCHER
2506
GERANIUM AVE E
37
NIA
$2,738.00
$2,738.00
252922120077
NANCY C KELLER
2507
GERANIUM AVE E
28
NIA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120157
LEON F AXTMAN
2510
GERANIUM AVE E
31
NiA
$2,294.00
$2,294.00
252922120065
RICK T ANDERSON
2511
GERANIUM AVE E
28
NIA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120156
EMILY ANNE LARSEN
2512
GERANIUM AVE E
31
NIA
$2,294.00
$2,294.00
252922120076
GEORGIANNA E KEMPER
2513
GERANIUM AVE E
28
NIA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120154
GREGORY HOCKING
2514
GERANIUM AVE E
31
NIA
$2,294.00
$2,294.00
252922120066
CECILE I MALACK
2515
GERANIUM AVE E
28
NIA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120155
TERRENCE ROBINSON
2516
GERANIUM AVE E
31
NIA
$2,294.00
$2,294.00
252922120075
COLLEEN M WHELAN
2517
GERANIUM AVE E
28
NIA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120074
LOIS J LAITINEN
2521
GERANIUM AVE E
28
NiA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120067
COLLEEN M CONNOLLY
2523
GERANIUM AVE E
28
NIA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120073
RODRIGUEZ INVESTMENT PROP LLC
2525
GERANIUM AVE E
28
N/A
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120068
EDWARD M WEGWERTH
2527
GERANIUM AVE E
28
NIA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120072
VICKY L SARNER
2531
GERANIUM AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120069
DIANE L MILLER
2533
GERANIUM AVE E
28
NIA
$2,072.00
$2,072.00
252922120188
JEFFREY E VINER
2563
GERANIUM AVE E
2
NIA
$7,400.00
$7,400.00
252922120185
ALICE M SCHROEDER LE
2583
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120186
CAROL J MILLAR
2591
GERANIUM AVE E
50
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120187
SALLY J EVANS
2593
GERANIUM AVE E
50
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120088
THOMAS G MUELLNER SR
2597
GERANIUM AVE E
50
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120087
THOMAS G MUELLNER SR
2599
GERANIUM AVE E
50
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922110015
DANIEL K HAAKINSON
2627
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NiA
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
252922110016
THEODORE V CARLSON
2637
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NIA
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110017
MARILYN DEMOULLY
2645
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NIA
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110018
EDWARD R RANG
2657
GERANIUM AVE E
3
N/A
$12,300.00
$14,880.00
$27,180.00
252922110028
TIMOTHY I FLEISCHHACKER
2666
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NIA
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110027
JOSEPH MISKE
2674
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NIA
$4,100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110026
ROGER R GUND III
2682
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NIA
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110019
DENNIS W KERSKA
2663
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NIA
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110020
DAVID A DRUMMOND
2691
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NiA
$4,100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110025
SCOTT D ANDERSON
2692
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NIA
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110024
ALLAN SKY HUELSMAN
2700
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NIA
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110021
CURRENT RESIDENT
2701
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NIA
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922110060
STEVEN R WENSMAN
2707
GERANIUM AVE E
1
NIA
$4.100.00
$4,960.00
$9,060.00
252922120003
KATHLEEN M FLANAGAN
1189
GLENDON ST
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120002
JEFFREY MCCLURE
1197
GLENDON ST
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120184
SALVADOR J FERROZZO
1124
GLENDON ST N
50
NiA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120183
LINDA S FREY
1126
GLENDON ST N
50
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
1 of 2
FERNDALE - GERANIUM AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT INFORMATION CITY PROJECT 07 -14
PARCEL ID
TAXPAYER
STREET
NUMBER
STREET
RESIDENTIAL
UNITS
COMMERCIAL
FRONT
FOOTAGE
MULTI - FAMILY
FRONT
FOOTAGE
STORM
ASSESSMENT'
WATERMAIN
ASSESSMENT
STREET
ASSESSMENT
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
252922120182
TIMOTHY P KENNEDY
1134
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120012
ROXANNE MAGEE
1135
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120181
RICHARD K GILBERT
1140
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120011
BILL ACRES
1145
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700 -00
$3,700.00
252922120180
MARTIN N CARLSON
1146
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120179
JAMES J VERNSTROM
1150
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120010
TERRANCE M STREHLO
1153
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120178
JEFFREY T BOSTON
1158
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120009
MICHAEL J NOVAK
1159
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700 -00
$3,700.00
252922120177
GARY G SJERVEN
1166
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120006
PAUL B GEORGE
1167
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120005
BRUCE A SCHLEICHER
1175
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120004
DOREEN E WILLIAMS
1163
GLENDON ST N
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922120032
MARGARET H GOODSON
2504
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120061
BETTY J BEANE
2505
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120029
THOMAS G CASPERSON
2506
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120048
COLLEEN A NAUGHTON
2507
ROSE AVE E
30
NiA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120033
BARBARA J RAAEN
2510
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120049
ROBERTA K GOESS
2511
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120028
MARGARET E FERGUSON
2512
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120060
ALMA E JARVINEN
2513
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120034
DONALD M MCNEA
2514
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120050
GERRI A CLARKIN L E
2515
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120027
MARK J SCHREIER
2516
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120059
ANNE M BRUCKER
2517
ROSE AVE E
30
NiA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120035
THERESA BEHNKE
2520
ROSE AVEE
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120051
RUTH A STAUS
2521
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120026
LOIS L LYNCH
2522
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120058
SEAN M MCCARTY
2523
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120036
KENYON S LATHAM JR
2524
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120052
MICHAEL LOUIS MILLER SR
2525
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120025
ALEMAYEHU WAYESSA
2526
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120057
RICHARD L GILL
2527
ROSE AVE E
30
NiA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120037
LAURA L LINROTH
2530
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120053
DENNIS K SCHACHT
2531
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120024
NANCY L WHITE
2532
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120056
LON M PETERS
2533
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120038
MYRON H LARSON
2534
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120054
CRISTI J TORGERSEN
2535
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120023
SHAJIULLAH KHAN
2536
ROSE AVE E
30
NIA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922120055
PHILLIP T DEMMA
2537
ROSE AVE E
30
NiA
$2,220.00
$2,220.00
252922139065
RICHARD E WEINHOLD
2615
STILLWATER RD
1
NIA
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
252922140001
DAVID Y CHANG
2627
STILLWATER RD E
218
NIA
$16,132.00
$16,132.00
252922110035
ROBERT E DOANE
2637
STILLWATER RD E
114
NIA
$8,436.00
$8,436.00
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL STORM WATERMAIN
UNITS FRONT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
FOOTAGE
TOTALS= 56 682.00 $5,740.00 $69,700.00
2007 ASSESSMENT RATES,
STREET
ASSESSMENT
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
$451,376.00
$536,276.00
TOTAL =
$536,276.00
RESIDENTIAL STORM SEWER = $820.00 /UNIT
RESIDENTIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $4,960.00 /UNIT
RESIDENTIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $3,700.001UNIT
COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER = $16.401FRONT FOOT
COMMERCIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $99.20IFRONT FOOT
COMMERCIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $74A01FRONT FOOT
NOTES:
' PROPERTIES LABELED - NiA" WERE PREVIOUSLY ASSESSED FOR STORM SEWER UNDER CITY PROJECT 73 -14 OR 78 -20 OR BOTH.
'ASSESSMENT INCLUDES THE FEES FOR EXTENDING SAN. AND WATER SERVICES TO THIS PROPERTY FOR A LOT SPLIT.
2 oft
EAT LN
SIN DR J
4"5
AVE.
1 ANTELOPE WAY
2 AMBERJACK LN
3 BEAVERDALE RD
4 BOBCAT LN
5 COUGAR LN
AVE.
oil 901"1 NIVA
JNOLIA
Geranium
Park
z
A
D
U�
U�
U Lij
0
cn - i - a <
1-- z
�O
------------------ = '
NO SCALE
Ferndale—Gercnium, 07-1
Maplewood, Minnesota
Proposed 2007 Construction
D
G
�P�j
U �
D
U�
HAWTHORNE
AVE.
D
G
�P�j
SEA ► i
August 13, 2007
Department of Public Works
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood MN, 55109
ATTN: City Clerk
Dear Sir or Madame,
This letter is in response to the Statement of Assessment we received on August 11, 2007. The
Assessment is concerning City Project # 07 -14: Ferndale- Geranium Area Street Improvements.
We are objecting to this assessment on three points:
The first being that we already pay a significant amount of property tax to the City of
Maplewood. This project should have already been part of our current property tax and we
simply don't feel it is necessary to charge the residents of this area an additional fee to improve
what the City of Maplewood should already be maintaining for us.
Second, we currently have our townhouse up for sale and will not be living at this location for
much longer. We feel it is not in our best interest to pay this additional $2,220.00 because it
does not benefit in the long run in any way. Plus, having an assessment on the property will
certainly make selling the townhouse more difficult in an already poor market. I'm sure the other
homeowners with property for sale feel the same way.
And third, like many of the residents in this area, we do not have an extra $2,220.00 available to
pay the City of Maplewood additional money to fix the roads who's upkeep they are responsible
for. We simply can not afford this assessment.
liffi •
RECEIVE
Property identification number: AUG 2 0 2007
(12 digit number) Worts
Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ❑ ❑
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise
or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city
clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your
request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city
council consider (check one):
a. ❑ Deferral of assessment
b. Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
C. ❑ Cancellation of assessment
d. ❑ Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
iro d n s A , ► h KeJ
M
iii► iil►
. r r
gnature
IF i I
Agenda Item H2
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Michael Thompson, Civil Engineer 11
SUBJECT: Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements, Project 07-15
1. Assessment Hearing, 7:15 p.m.
2. Approve Resolution for Adoption of Assessment Roll
3. Approve Resolution Authorizing the Installation of Burke Avenue Cul-De-
Sac based on Resident Petition Request; Approve No Parking Resolution
in Cul-De-Sac Bulb
4. Approve Resolution for Awarding of Bid
DATE: August 16, 2007
I Z III I a*] Dili[" 9 [*1 Z
All property owners have been mailed a notice of the exact amount of their assessment, as well as notice
that they must submit a written objection either at or prior to the hearing if they disagree with the
assessment amount.
The city council should conduct the assessment hearing, receive any objections, refer those objections to
the staff for action at the September 10, 2007 council meeting and consider approving the attached
resolution adopting the assessment roll without the property owners who have submitted objections. It
should be noted that the assessment roll currently proposed for adoption has changed from the
assessment roll accepted on July 23 This change consists of the addition of one property to the
assessment roll. This property owner had been mailed all previous notices including the public hearing and
neighborhood meeting notices.
Final plans and specifications for the Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvements were approved by the city
council on July 23 2007, and authorization was given to advertise for bids. Those bids were received and
subsequently opened on Thursday August 23 2007. The city council should consider approving the
attached resolution approving the award of bid following the assessment hearing and the adoption of the
assessment roll. The city council should also consider approving the attached resolution approving the cul
de-sac installation on Burke Avenue in response to the resident driven petition.
mm -_i-
The city council ordered the preparation of this feasibility study at the June 11 2007 regular meeting. On
July 9 2007 the city council accepted the feasibility report and ordered the public hearing.
Street improvements for this neighborhood were listed on the city's capital improvements project plan for
2008 but the city council is now considering the project for 2007. The project involves the complete
reconstruction of approximately 1.7 miles of residential streets and affects approximately 120 properties.
The streets in the project area do not have curb and gutter and the design calls for barrier concrete curb
and gutter throughout. The rainwater garden program and driveway replacement program will be utilized
for this project. Currently about 25% of the residents are requesting a rain water garden as part of the
improvements. Major storm sewer improvements along with sanitary sewer spot repairs are proposed.
Agenda Item H2
Installation Of8short section of water main is proposed between Sandhurst and County RdB along with
improvements to some service lines, gate valves, and hydrants.
A neighborhood meeting was held on July 1» discuss the proposed project with residents. At this
meeting the residents were provided with @n overview 0f the proposed project 8Ddth9StnaGtrRCODSt[uCtiOn
process. They were also given the opportunity k] ask any questions they had regarding the project. City
staff conducted a second neighborhood plan review meeting on August 21' 2007vvhRn8n8sid8nLs could
review and make final oornnoentS on the design plans. City staff and the Cib/ SOn3U|bant met on site with the
residents who were very concerned with the drainage issues along Prosperity Road between County Road
B and Burke Avenue. The design plans call for improving the capacity of the ditch (grading), installing a
rain garden on the Group Health property to reduce the volume of runoff flowing under County Road B to
the Prosperity Road ditch, along with installing new culverts and additional underground drainage
infrastructure at the Burke/Prosperity intersection.
The proposed project Sch9UU|e anticipates construction beginning aSearly as September 2007 and
completion of the project in November of 2007.
Only costs related to the street improvements are proposed b]be assessed and are not directly dependent
on the 3Ctuo| amount of the bid, rather on o predetermined 8S383smeDt rote established in the city's
pavement management policy. The method of assessment is the same as was outlined in the feasibility
study. The proposed assessments will be for costs n]|8Ling to the street and UU|ib/ innpn]v8nn8nt8 to the
benefiting properties abutting the project Str88tS.l[h8oSSSSSnl8ntSf0[th8Str89t8DdStOr[n8n8ahOvvD
b8|Vvv. Many properties are exempt from the drainage improvement assessment because it was already
assessed in8previous city project. The storm sewer assessment iS8 one time only assessment.
Residential Rates:
* $4,960 /unit for full street reconstruction (adding or replacing curb & gutter).
0 $82U /unit for drainage improvements.
COnorD8PCiG| Or k8U|ti-F@nli|y Rates:
* $09.20 /Front Ft. for full street reconstruction (adding Or nap|@CiOg Curb & gutter).
° $16.40/Front Ft. for drainage improvements.
The total amount proposed LVb8 assessed iS$889.OS84U.
Regarding the cU|-de-s8c action; fourteen residents signed 8 petition k} install 8cu|-d8-S8ConBurke
Avenue @t the intersection 0f White Bear Avenue Or install @ barricade if@Cu|-d8-SGC was not feasible. The
petition was presented tO the city council Gt the public hearing 0D July 23 Please find the petition
attached. |n response [0 the petition, city staff sent out 8 questionnaire in order bJ get more feedback on
the issue from residents who have property fronting Burke Avenue between Prosperity Road and White
Bear Avenue. These responses are also attached.
Eight residents on Burke Avenue responded to the city staff questionnaire for installing a cul-de-sac on
Burke Avenue (which iS about half Cf total properties fronting the stn8eh. Six 0f the eight nesidents8pe
supportive of tU|-d8's8c. while two are against. The original cul-de-sac |8y0UL was [0 extend
approximately 5-feet from White Bear Avenue, but after concerns from the resident at 2125 White Bear
Avenue about losing parking due to its layout, the proposed cul-de-sac location was shifted 00-fe8ttOthe
west 8S seen in the attachment. City staff met with the owners of the two properties most impacted by the
proposed cul-de-sac. These were the two properties 8t the very east end Of Burke Avenue /1771 BU[h8&
2125 White BR8r\. Also, city staff had Gphone conversation with the resident 8L1785 Burke Avenue who
had mJ ob k} the proposal. These owners were generally supportive Vf the Cul-d8-s8t and have not
objected todate.
One of the two residents opposed to the cul-de-sac addressed 8letter to the public works director, city
council, and staff engineer discussing reasons against the CU|dG-S8C. The letter is included with the
response and put On public record 8s requested bvthe objector.
City staff sent the ou|-df+SoC layout hO the city police chief, fire chief, and fire marshal, and it was examined
and found that nO safety issues are associated with installing 800'dianneLerCu|-d8-S8C. There would have
to be a no parking condition in the cul-de-sac bulb in order to nn8xinniz8 the turning n8UiVS for emergency
vehicles. It is city staff's view that installing 8 cul-de-sac on Burke Avenue would be beneficial. It would
create 8 more residential type Str88L by disconnecting it from the highly traveled White Bear Avenue. It
vvOu|d also 8||0vv for net reduction Of impervious street anaa, which translates into o reduction of storm
water runoff and reduction iD reconstruction costs. The cost reduction would be found in the net area
reduction Vf the street pavement section of approximately 775 square feet. Snow storage could b8
accommodated in the large open area between the new cul-de-sac and White Bear Avenue. Also, the
transportation supervisor for District 622 was notified of the cul-de-sac proposal and stated that school
buses vvoU|d likely pick children Up at the intersection of Burke and Prosperity. And if there were any
special needs children on Burke, between Prosperity and White Bear Avenue, a smaller bus would be
utilized in order to navigate the proposed Cu|-de-sao.
[)n8 side note, iD response tO complaints about speeding OOF|GDdr@U Street, 8 questionnaire was also
rn8i|8d out to residents near the intersection of F|8ndr8V 8ir8eL and Laurie Road concerning traffic calming.
The city questionnaire asked if residents were in favor or in opposition to traffic calming bump outs at the
intersection. Twelve responses were received and only five were supportive of the traffic no|noin8 bump
outs. The remaining seven were opposed or wanted some other type of calming such 88 a speed bump or
4-way stop. The city set Vp speed counters along the Sb m 98t�ndfOUndL�8tth88� percentile speed was
26 mph. Given this result which shows the street does not have excessive speeders and the fact that there
is not a majority consensVs on the traffic calming bump outs, staff iS not planning 0n changing the existing
intersection condition. No action is required on this matter.
Award of Bid
Contractor bids were received and publicly read aloud 8t10:OO8.[n. Thursday, August 23 2007. The
bid tabulation letter will be provided 8Lthe city council meeting.
Changes km Assessment Roll
AS was stated earlier, 8 change tO the assessment roll accepted ot the July 23 m .2OO7 Council meeting was
necessary. The change |S listed below.
1. Parcel UD102922430W44-1655County Road B E — Thispropedvvvaainadvedent|y
omitted from the original assessment roll. This property has 8 main driveway off OfKennard
Street and should b8 assessed in order tV treat all properties equally. Total Assessment is
$4,960.
The assessment statements that were mailed to the residents already ref all changes. The total amount
tObe assessed was subsequently increased from $G94'138.4Ut0$088.O98.4O.
Assessment Objections Filed
1. ASof August 2»m.2UO7 staff has received three objections tV the proposed assessments:
o. Porna| 10.2S.22/41.UO27— Robert F. Parsons; 2229 Prosperity Rood
Mc Parsons objects to the 8GSeGSnnent based upon senior citizen financial hardship.
b. Parcel 1O.20.22/44.8050— Dorothy Ghev8;1080 Lark Avenue
Mrs. Sleva objects to the assessment based upon senior citizen financial hardship.
c. Parcel 11.29.22.33.0001 — Joe Fleming; 2271 White Bear Avenue
Mr. Fleming objects to the assessment based upon the usable Lark Ave front frontage.
Staff will review all objections and provide the city council recommendations for motion at the September
1 oth , 2007 city council meeting.
The proposed assessments are part Ofthe project financing plan, approved iD July Of2OO7. Any
assessments that may ultimately be reduced or deferred will have an impact on the tax levy. AGi8t8nl8nt
[f tax levy impact will be made for the September 10 council meeting when all the assessments
objections and recommendations are considered.
kiSrecommended that the city council approve the attached Resolutions for the Adoption of the
/\SseSsnlert ROU. Installation of the Cu|-d8-S8C on Burke Avenue with a no parking condition within the cul-
de-sac bulb, and Award Of Bids for Lark/Prosperity A[8o Street Improvements, City Project 07-15.
Attachments:
1. Resolution: Adoption «r the Assessment Ron
z. Resolution: Cu|-De-Sao Installation with wo Parking inBulb
a. Resolution: Award mBid
4. Assessment Roll
u. Location Map
0. Objection Letters (3)
r. Resident Petition for Burke Avenue
8. Resident Responses to the Burke Avenue Cu|'oo'Smu
9. Proposed Cu|'oo'8aoLayout
10 Bid Tabulation Letter (to uo provided at city council meeting)
RESOLUTION
ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on July 23rd, 2007, calling for a Public Hearing, the
assessment roll for the Lark,'Prosperity Area Street Improvements, City Project 07 -15, was presented in a Public Hearing format,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, due to a clerical error in the previously accepted assessment roll, the following changes were necessary, and
the assessment roll shall be amended as follows:
1. Parcel ID 102922430044 — 1655 County Road B E —This property was inadvertently omitted from the original
assessment roll. This property has a main driveway off of Kennard Street and should be assessed in order to treat all
properties equally. Total Assessment is 54,960.
And, WHEREAS, the following property owners have filed objections to their assessments according to the
requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows:
a. Parcel 10.29.22.44.0027 — Robert F. Parsons; 2229 Prosperity Road
Mr. Parsons objects to the assessment based upon senior citizen financial hardship.
b. Parcel 10.29.22.44.0056 — Dorothy Sleva; 1680 Lark Avenue
Mrs. Sleva objects to the assessment based upon senior citizen financial hardship.
c. Parcel 11.29.22.33.0001 —Joe Fleming; 2271 White Bear Avenue
Mr. Fleming objects to the assessment amount based upon the usable Lark Ave front frontage.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
I. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to review the objections received and report to the City
Council at the regular meeting on September 10, 2007, as to their recommendations for adjustments.
2. The assessment roll for the Lark Prosperity Area Street Improvements as amended, without those property owners'
assessments that have filed objections, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted.
Said assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein
included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
3. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first installments
to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2008 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.0 percent per annum
for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire
assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2007. To each subsequent installment when due shall be
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, but
no later than October t, 2007, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of the
payment, to the city clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the
adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time after October 1, 2007, pay to the county auditor the entire amount
of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made.
Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next
succeeding year.
5. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after October 1, 2007, but no later than November 15, 2007, transmit a
certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such
assessments shall be collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the council on this 27 day of August 2007.
RESOLUTION
BURKE AVEVNUE CUL-DE-SAC INSTALLATION WITH A NO PARKING CONDITION
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the
city council adopts a resolution to install a cul-de-sac on Burke Avenue between Prosperity Road and White Bear
Avenue and to adopt a no parking condition within the cul-de-sac bulb.
Adopted by the council on this 27 day of August 2007.
RESOLUTION
AWARD K»FBIDS
NOW, THEREFORE, 8EITRESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL {)[ MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the
bid of bn the amount u{$ b/ the lowest responsible bid for the
construction ofLark/Prosperity ArouSbzc\lrnproveoncutm —Ci Project 07-15, and the mayor and clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city.
The finance director is hereby authorized N make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing
plan for the project.
Adopted |m the council ou this 27' day nf August 2007.
LARKIPROSPERITY AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL CITY PROJECT 07 -15
2007 ASSESSMENT RATES:
RESIDENTIAL STORM SEWER = $820.001UNIT
RESIDENTIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $4,960.001UNIT
RESIDENTIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $3,700.00 /UNIT
COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER = $16.401FRONT FOOT
COMMERCIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $99.201FRONT FOOT
COMMERCIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = S74.00 /FRONT FOOT
NOTES:
'PROPERTIES LABELED "NJA" WERE PREVIOUSLY ASSESSED FOR STORM SEWER UNDER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CITY PROJECTS:
(COPE UTILITIES DP 159. ASSESSED 1971) : (COUNTY DITCH 17 - PROJECT 74 -18. ASSESSED 19781 (FOOTPRINT LAKE STORM - PROJECT 87 -32. ASSESSED 1991)
PARCEL ID
TAXPAYER
STREET
NUMBER
STREET
RESIDENTIAL
UNITS
COMMERCIAL
FRONT
FOOTAGE
STORM
ASSESSMENT'
STREET
ASSESSMENT
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
102922440037
COPE AVE. PROFESSIONAL BLDG
1714
COPE AVENUE E
124
N/A
$9,176.00
$9,176.00
102922440004
DENNIS R TRAMPE
1736
COPE AVENUE E
-
124
N/A
$9,176.00
$9,176.00
102922440096
PATRICIA J HAAG
1665
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430021
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
KENNARD STREET N
-
-
-
-
-
102922440058
NATHAN BLEYLE
1666
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440044
KEVIN M MCLAFFERTY
1673
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440057
ROBERT A WAS] LUK
1674
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440045
LAWRENCE J PEIL ETAL
1679
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440056
DOROTHY P SLEVA
1680
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440046
MARK J CHANNER
1685
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440055
MARJORIE G LEE
1686
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440047
LARRY L BEWLEY
1693
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440054
GLADYSANN SANDSTROM
1694
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440048
WALLACE L NEUMAN
1699
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440053
DARRELL E ANDERSON
1700
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440049
GORDON A ANDERSON ETAL
1705
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440052
JOSEPH A OBRIEN
1706
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440050
SHELLY A LARSON
1713
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440051
SHAWN GREGORY
1714
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440007
TODD BRUNS
1725
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$3,700.00
$3,700.00
102922440021
KAREN J TETU
1726
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440008
AMY L SLOPER
1733
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440020
RALPH F FELLER
1734
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440009
MERLYN J ADER
1739
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440019
BERTIN BARRERA QUINTERO
1742
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440010
KEITH M ESALA
1745
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440018
LAWRENCE G JANSEN
1750
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440011
AKINTUNDE ODUWAIYE
1751
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440017
THOMAS E LABEY
1758
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440012
DAVID C SACKETT
1759
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440016
JUANITA M GUSTAVSON
1764
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440013
KEVIN L THOMPSON
1765
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440015
FELETI MOIMOI
1774
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440014
JAMES P GLASSEL
1775
LARK AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440059
CHRISTINE NOVAK
1665
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430022
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
LAURIE ROAD E
102922440073
DONALD J KAREL
1666
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440060
MARY KAY TRACY
1673
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440072
LORETTA L FARRAR
1674
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440061
ELSIE N ANDERSON
1679
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440071
BRIAN D RAU
1680
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440062
GERALD D BIBEAU
1685
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440070
EDITH L WALDVOGEL
1686
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440063
PHILIP C BURDINE
1693
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440069
JAMES A MCCUSKER
1694
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440064
ROBERT W NIELSEN
1699
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440068
JAMES D NEWTON
1700
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440065
RUSSELL W ANDERSON
1705
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440067
BETTY C KRENZ
1712
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440066
EDWARD P ROMAN
1713
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440022
JAMES J PRAML
1725
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440034
RICHARD M PRUDEN
1726
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440023
RICHARD F BORK
1733
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440033
JOHN A KLENK
1734
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440024
JEFFREY J LIBEL
1741
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440025
COLLEEN M GAICHAS
1745
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440026
THOMAS G VONWALTER
1755
LAURIE ROAD E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440027
ROBERT F PARSONS
2229
PROSPERITY ROAD
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440028
LON L FEIA
2223
WHITE BEAR AVE N
230
N/A
522,816.00
$22.816.00
102922440032
THAI THOA
2215
PROSPERITY ROAD
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440031
ROBERT EMERSON
2225
PROSPERITY ROAD N
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440030
GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC.
2165
WHITE BEAR AVE N
-
579
N/A
$57,436.80
$57.436.80
102922440029
PATRICK ALLEN OTT
2225
WHITE BEAR AVE N
-
176
N/A
$17,459.20
$17.459.20
102922430038
ANN M ROGERS
1610
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430026
BENJAMIN N HICKMAN
1613
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430037
DONALD L COLBERT ET AL
1616
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430027
JOSEPH L TIMMERS
1621
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430036
ESTHER M HARRIS
1622
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430028
RICHARD F CARLE
1627
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430035
ERWIN H YOUNGS
1630
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
1 of 2
LARKIPROSPERITY AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL CITY PROJECT 07 -15
2007 ASSESSMENT RATES:
RESIDENTIAL STORM SEWER = $820.001UNIT
RESIDENTIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $4,960.001UNIT
RESIDENTIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $3,700.00 /UNIT
COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER = $16.40/FRONT FOOT
COMMERCIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $99.201FRONT FOOT
COMMERCIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = S74.00/FRONT FOOT
NOTES:
'PROPERTIES LABELED "NJA" WERE PREVIOUSLY ASSESSED FOR STORM SEWER UNDER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CITY PROJECTS:
(COPE UTILITIES DP 159. ASSESSED 1971) : (COUNTY DITCH 17 - PROJECT 74 -18. ASSESSED 19781 (FOOTPRINT LAKE STORM - PROJECT 87 -32. ASSESSED 1991)
PARCEL ID
TAXPAYER
STREET
NUMBER
STREET
RESIDENTIAL
UNITS
COMMERCIAL
FRONT
FOOTAGE
STORM
ASSESSMENT'
STREET
ASSESSMENT
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
102922430029
CHARLES G HOPKINS ETAL
1633
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430030
LEAH KUSTER MCCLARNON
1639
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430034
TONG N YANG
1640
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430031
NOAH A KORBA
1649
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430032
CATHERINE J WALKER
1655
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430033
JOSE REYES
1656
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440074
WILLIAM GLAMPE
1665
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440086
CARL E BERGLUND
1666
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440075
ARTHUR RINEHART JR
1675
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440085
JAMES M RASSETT
1676
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440076
VIOLET J AMIOT
1689
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440084
LOIS BERNICE JOHNSON TRUSTEE
1692
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440077
DICK M CALLEN
1695
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440083
YOU HER
1698
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440082
TERENCE J NADLER
1706
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440078
MORTGAGE ELEC REG SYSTEMS INC
1709
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440081
STEVEN A FREEMAN
1714
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440080
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
SANDHURST AVE E
102922440079
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
SANDHURST AVE E
102922440035
ANTHONY N PIKE
1725
SANDHURST AVE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440036
JOHN R LAWRENCE
2205
PROSPERITY ROAD N
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922440087
MARLYCE M JOHNSON
1665
COUNTY ROAD B E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
102922430023
JAMES A KRESSIN
2209
KENNARD STREET N
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922120013
OPERATIONS ISO 622
1560
COUNTY ROAD B E
309
N/A
S30,652.80
$30.652.80
152922120006
JACQUELINE MARY FRANK
1646
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922120003
KIMBERLY M DIEDRICH
1647
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922120004
KATHERINE A OGRADY
1655
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922120007
WILLIAM A OSWALD
1654
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110032
JOHN P MCGARRIGLE
1659
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110042
ALFRED 0 CLEMEN JR
1662
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110031
D FRANKLIN TOLBERT
1669
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110030
GREGORY A KOLBECK
1675
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110038
GERALD J SOLNITZKY
2121
PROSPERITY ROAD N
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110022
MARK E GOPHER
1708
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110021
GRACE E LOCKE
1714
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110008
CAROLE E LYNNE
1723
BURKE AVENUE E
1
$820.00
$4,960.00
$5,780.00
152922110020
XIONG S VANG
1724
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110009
JOSHUA S MOGREN
1731
BURKE AVENUE E
1
$820.00
$4,960.00
$5,780.00
152922110019
ERIC A BOYD
1732
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110010
JOHN A PECHMANN
1737
BURKE AVENUE E
1
$820.00
$4,960.00
$5,780.00
152922110018
ROBERT F KUSTERMAN
1742
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110011
STUART D OLSON
1747
BURKE AVENUE E
1
$820.00
$4,960.00
$5,780.00
152922110017
W F FRANTZ
1750
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110012
EDWARD C FLAHERTY
1755
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110016
GREGORY C MOSER JR
1760
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110046
TIMOTHY A HOAAS
1765
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110014
THOMAS M ZANGS
1771
BURKE AVENUE E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
152922110015
SHIRLEY N TREBESH
2125
WHITE BEAR AVE N
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
112922330001
JOSEPH L FLEMING
2271
WHITE BEAR AVE N
98
N/A
$9,721.60
$9,721.60
102922430044
CLAY A LANGER
1655
COUNTY ROAD B E
1
N/A
$4,960.00
$4,960.00
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL STORM
UNITS FRONT
FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT
TOTALS= 109 1640 $3,280.00
STREET
ASSESSMENT
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
$695,818.40
$699,098.40
TOTAL =
$699,098.40
2 aft
I ILJI cERVAis
viEw AVE. CT.
AVE,
Knuckle Hecd Ecke C AVE, -)
<
ry
D.
o Q cn Un UA W _I
� Sherwood --- i W
RST o <
W � _
co. RD. > B
E. BURK AVE.
Cn As Community
/E. 6 � 65 Center
John Glenn
0 GATEWAY City Hall
0
w HARRIS AVE.
Q ROSEWOOD AVE. N.
z
ROSEWOOD
AV, AVE. S RAMSEY C
1 F1 r�y I
��. �P NUR AIR GR
NO SCALE
Lark — Prosperity, 07-15
Maplewood, Minnesota
Proposed 2007 Construction
Property identification number:
j (a - 2- -4 - LJ - �
1 2 d igit n u m – e r)
Do you wish to address the City Council tonight? F
Yes YO
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise
or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city
clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your
request will become part of the public hearing record. I request th9t the city
council consider (check one): Okc, Q 4 1 IMVP
-
f z , a�,,& kk
a. Deferral of assessment ce-filct" CL OVIZ
b. wenior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
C. i5 Cancellation of assessment
d. F Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
doh LJO I IAAQ �, �—' 9CIIVZI AND WDe--6,TOW
cl� LC 8 L� 4/ F QN IA i� A 0, 1 H' C re-Q Q C ORI Df -!
Address of Property OZ Zip Telephone
t
... L!'J.l./- !�/*J✓ yf'j�.t NjS,l '/-l�- '�'- t�.��{ .�./I l.� %..1� .._ {.... f tL" -., g �}��i.....J� ..(...'�../ _� {1 ._VOI�� � 1/ � , �� . �._/ f
i
1 I
r L
E
F
twe
. ;�'
e �
1
1
� e
f
a
/ { 4
u l
ato
M A
Lo
IAI
� a
9AA
CAA A_a- -
6bM
tzcr
----------
2 -0
_Aaa _Q_
, �OCAUI
lqi;,a
m
r.! I
ASSESS-MENT HEARING OBJECTION FORM
STREET 1IMPROVEmiENTS
PROJECT 07-0
Address of assessed parcel l So L /l, h livf—
Property identification number:
(12 digit number}
D r-
Cho you wish to address the city council tonight? I F
Yes No
Please complete this form if You intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise
or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city
clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your
request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city
council consider (check one):
a. F Deferral of assessment
i
b. j I X Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
C. F Cancellation of assessment
d. F Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
1 - XV , <,-,
' j
0 V
Print Name Signature Date
�o L 14
1 a E /I x, kf , /)-) /-� 1 --I ( -5 1 ) am 3
Address of Property Owner dip
Telephone
Do you wish to address the city council tonight?
Yes No
El Deferral of assess_ eat
Is
Address of Property Owner
June 26, 2007
Lark/Prosperity Area Street Improvement Project, No. 07 -15
1. White Bear Avenue at Burke Avenue has long been a safety issue for any vehicle
making a left turn onto Burke Avenue. Burke Avenue at White Bear Avenue is
also a safety issue when attempting a left turn. Essentially, a right turn onto
White Bear Avenue from Burke is the only safe turn at that intersection.
2. Burke Avenue between White Bear Avenue and Prosperity is a residential street
with an incline at mid - point. Traffic from Prosperity turns onto Burke to bypass
the lights at County Road B and White Bear Avenue. This begins at 5:00 a.m.
and continues all day in an easterly direction. The drivers drive up Burke at the
speed they were doing on Prosperity. We have young children living at the east
end of the street.
3. In the fixture, White Bear Avenue Family Health Center will bring additional
traffic to our street, as clients drive up Prosperity and take the short -cut up Burke
Avenue to White Bear Avenue.
We, the undersigned, request that a cull de sac be constructed on Burke Avenue at White
Bear Avenue. If this is not feasible, then I request Burke be barricaded at White Bear
with a "No Outlet" signage at its entrance. Now is the time to do this while the roadway
is being constructed.
Name 1 Phone #
- 77 9
-- �aq - / ( , 7
L5) ®7T
-'
16
C) r?
BURKE AVET\TE CUL- DE-SAC SURVEY, CITY PROJECT 07-15
0
3& p , �WOOd
qk�� Vorll�
After reviewing the attached cul-de-sac exhibit please check one of the following:
A Yes. I am supportive of the cul-de-sac.
1:1 No. I am against the cul-de-sac.
❑ Neither. I prefer a different solution such as
1:1 No opinion,
Please write any additional conirnents here:
Retum this suney as soon as possible to the City Engineering Department.
j 'Ul-
3 0 2007
HURTLE AVE31, CUL- DE-SAC SURVEY, CITY PROJECT 07-15
After reviewing the attached cul-de-sac exhibit please check one of the following:
Respondent Nanic:
Respondent Addres
Respondent Phone:
Z l/Y'cs. I ant supportive of the cul-de-sac.
❑ No. I am against the cul-de-sac.
F Neither, I prefer a different solution such as
1:1 No opinion.
Return this surrey as so as possible to the City Engineering Department.
ED
JtJ
B TKE AVENUE CUL- DE-SAC SURVEY, CITY PROJECT 07-15
After reviewing the attached cul-de-sac exhibit please check one of the following:
Respondent Name:
Respondent Address:
Respondent Phone:
F7
Yes. I am supportive of the cul-de-sac.
❑ No. I am against the cul-de-sac.
❑ Neither. I prefer a different solution such as
❑ No opinion.
Please write any additional comments here:
Return this Sunley !Ls�On a ssib to the City Engineering Department.
L: 7/V �/J L)
7 &CILL
7
1�r (- I /j
It
/E//�t
T
7_12,1 / Z_/El Q 7C:%
121-43111 J A 2 - ,0
C:�
7
Return this Sunley !Ls�On a ssib to the City Engineering Department.
JN
'~L 31 20»
AVENUE CUL DE SURVEY, CITY P
After reviewing the attached cul exhibit please check one ofthe :
r_1" Yes. I ain supportive of the cul
�-�
L_J No. I azo against the cul-de-sac.
[-� .
L_| Neither. T prefer ad' �f�rnn1oo]ut�nz such ao
[ op
Please write any additional corninents here:
jZECEIMED
AUG G i 20t,
le-
BURKE AVENUE CUL- DE -SAC SURVEY CITY PROJECT 07 -15 !al
After reviewing the attached cul -de -sac exhibit please check one of the following:
Respondent Name:
Respondent Addre
Respondent Phone
❑ Yes. I am supportive of the cul -de -sac.
No. I am against the cul -de -sac.
V
❑ Neither. I prefer a different solution such as
❑ No opinion.
Please write any additional comments here:
Return this survey as sooaa as passable to the City Engineering Department.
A"7 0 2 2007
5m,", -
BURIa AVENUE CUL- ICE -SAC SURVEY, CITY PROJECT 07-15 . lrcz�!
Pub-fic ln l l or" _,
After reviewing the attached cul-de-sac exhibit please check one of the following:
X Yes. I ani supportive of the cul-de-sac.
❑ No. I ain against the cul-de-sac.
❑ Neither. I prefer a different solution such as
❑ No opinion.
this survey as so in as ossible to the City Engineering Department.
Please write any additional comments here:
6t
'7
-1-- VED
AUCT 0 2 2007
BLM-E AVENTUE CUL- DE-SAC SURVEY, CITY PROJECT 07-15 ` "Plczllood
P4111Mr 111101 s
After reviewinc the attached cul-de-sac exhibit please check one of the following:
6
F'OFI
^ Yes. I any supportive of the cul-de-sac.
❑ No. I any against the cul-de-sac.
❑ Neither. I prefer a different solution such as
1:1 No opinion.
Please write any additional cormuents here:
fLe"i dermo
Return this Sul RE so on a ossi� to the City Engineering Department.
11111piqll ! iffpp� 111 i i� j p
I F
RespondentName: F FRAlzl
Respondent Phone:
Respondent Address: / 7.5
❑ Yes, I am supportive of the cul-de-sac.
N
X�_ No. I am against the cul-de-sac.
❑ Neither. I prefer a different solution such as
❑ No opinion.
Please write any additional comments here:
5E E 14 7 _1Af 14 E D 016r2 M E'Af 7
e-
E 44 �
Return this survey as soon as Dossible to the tCity Engineering Department.
Willard F. Frantz
1750 Burke Ave_ E.
Maplewood, Minnesota
August 10, 2007
RE: Burke Avenue Cul -Le -Sac
City Project 07 -15
To Whom It May Concern:
Regrettably, I was out of town and unable to be present when Petitioner presented this petition or these
comments would have been presented at that time. I applaud the civic mindedness and effort put forth in
this petition, however, I am compelled to disagree in total, primarily because I find no merit or
substantive facts or evidence to support the stated reasoning. The City Council should not and cannot
become involved in or resolve individual differences of opinion. My purpose here is to present what I
consider to be, "The rest of the story." Such a statement requires an explanation which I will provide
forthwith.
1. The subject of a cul -de -sac has been discussed on the street ever since the cul -de -sac on Flandrau
Circle was constructed. That was a special project and as I understand it, the total cost was assessed
each resident on the street on a unit basis. This was "Cash out of Pocket" and the residents approved it.
This petition, I fear, is opportunistic in that we have been informed it will be included in the Project and
there will be no individual or additional assessment. There is a cost to this cul -de -sac and regardless if it
is included in the total cost without a special assessment, the cost is apportioned to ALL property
owners included in Project 07 -15. Federal or State contributions are also tax revenue funds and 28
percent of the total Project costs are assessed to property owners. Is the price of a petitioner generated
project allowed to be incorporated into an approved public project and charged to everybody,
regardless of the fact they have no benefit from it? If a petition were circulated asking if all the other
residents included in Project 07 -15 wanted to help pay for a cul -de -sac on Burke Avenue, I think the
results would be obvious. If my assumptions above are correct, truth and transparency in the funding
and assessments for this project are not present.
2. When the subject of a cul -de -sac first came to my attention, I checked with the Maplewood
Engineering Department to determine what the standard specifications were. I was given a copy of
PLATE NO 120, dated 3-95, titled TYPICAL CULS -ICE -SAC. This Plate indicates the standard to be
a 94 foot diameter circle with an additional 13 foot right of way, making the real estate required to be a
circle with a diameter of 120 feet. Burke is a 32 foot roadway meaning that each resident at the East
end of Burke would have to grant to the City, a Right -Of -Way of 44 feet from the edge of the existing
roadway edges. Needless to say this would never happen - and it didn't.
Regardless, my basic concern is that the closure of access or egress to an existing street runs counter
to the reason it was constructed. While I know the "dimensions" of the "Typical" Standard and the
proposed cul -de -sac, I do know not know what other requirements exist for justifying the approval and
construction of one. Considering the disruption of an approved and constructed traffic flow pattern, I
would hope it would NOT be approved based upon "I want" or unsubstantiated facts which can be
easily verified or disproved. In this regard, an apathetic "I don't care" or "I don't want to cause
disharmony in the neighborhood" response :should NOT in nyy opinion be considered an approval of a
Petition to close a street. I would add that iftheir was documented evidence of the allegations or a
,
designated "Safety Issue" 1 would support this Petition without question.
3. The petition sets forth three reasons for the petition. While 1 may be verbose, I will address each
point, sentence by sentence for clarity and an explanation of1my reasorting. First however, I must
acknowledge a bias caused by petitioner when the petition was presented to me. Having told her four or
five times I would not sign the petition, she persisted by saying "she must have a signature" until my
wife took the clipboard and signed the petition to prevent the conversation from escalating to an
argument. My objection to the petition WAS NOT mentioned to the Council in response to a direct
question; "Were there any objections?" This same persistence is evident with regard to others that I
have spoken to who relented and signed the petition. They must speak for themselves so I will not
mention names. it is my considered opinion that apathy and a preponderance of "I don't care" or "I
don't want to create disharmony in the neighborhood" was the basis for many of the signatures that
carried this petition. That is an individuals right as it should be. However, decisions should be based
upon supported facts before any approval of changes to standards, specifications, or construction of any
project is commenced. I fail to find such basis in this petition. Further, no respondent is required to sign,
nor should he sign any petition unless they "fully" support it,
A. "ite Bear Avenue at Burke Avenue has Lon -aLg a le
g b een sa u or any vehicle ma king ft? iss e f
turn onto Burke. I have been making that turn for 30 years and continue to do so today. Admittedly,
with the increased traffic on White Bear during peak traffic periods (1.5 hours, A.M. and P.M.) M-F
and 12-1 P.M. on Sunday when the church on Van Dyke is dismissed, this maneuver can be
problematic. However, for the more timid, the resulting alternative is exactly what would be forced
upon us if a cul-de-sac was constructed: that is proceed to County Road B and make a left turn onto
County Road B. When prudent to do so, I do it now. However, for the remaining 21 hours of the day
there is really NO problem as far as I am concerned. The attached Maplewood Police Department
Address Strip Report substantiates this opinion as there have been NO reportable accidents at this
intersection during the period 12/11/04 and 07/31/07. In fact, the only accident at this intersection I can
remember in the 30 years I have lived at my present address is when a drunk driver rear-ended a vehicle
stopped for the County Road B stop light. This is not to say that there have not been -accidents at
County Road B or at the entrance of the Community Center Parking lot. Such incidents are not,
however associated with the intersection of Burke and White Bear Avenue.
B. Burke Avenue at "ite Bear is also a safe,
issue when attempting a left —turn. Again, myself and
many neighbors make that same turn every day and the explanation in A above applies. The claim is
NOT supported by any FACTS justifying the intersection to be a "Safety Issue" or any by recorded
complaints by Burke Avenue residents that I am aware of And again, there have been no accidents.
C. Essentially a riFht turn onto White Bear A mue from Burke is the Qnl
y sa fe turn at that
intersection. This is simply not true, When South bound on White Bear Avenue, I make a right hand
turn (West) onto Burke many times a day, peak traffic period or not. There is NOTHING to complicate
the maneuver nor is it a safety issue.
D. B and White Bear
Avenue. This is an assumption and allegation, which however, could be easily proved or disproved by a
Traffic Count Survey. Additionally, if this were true, are there any registered complaints from Burke
Avenue residents to substantiate this allegation? There are none that 1 know of Is It not logical fl - lat a
Petition to disrupt an area traffic pattern by the construction- of a cul-de-sac would be a last ditch effort
by disgruntled residents following NO action to numerous complaints? Further, would it not be
appropriate to conduct a traffic count survey to determine if the traffic on Burke exceeds that of a
normal residential street? Consider also, constructing a cul-de-sac would force ALL residents on Burke
Avenue to traverse someone else's residential road on a daily basis to get to their property which is
exactly what petitioner is complaining about. Should they also then be allowed to further disrupt the
traffic flow by requesting cul-de-sac's on their own streets? Standards are just that and should not be
carelessly waived for fear of a "Domino Effect" throughout the City of Maplewood.
E. 7his ins at. 00 a i;& and continues all day in an easterl direction. My property is at the
crest of Burke between Prosperity and White Bear. Such traffic must disappear before it reaches my
property as I for one have NOT seen such traffic. If this is a basis to approve a cul-de-sac, I respectfully
request that a traffic count survey be conducted to verify t alleged traffic from 5:00 A.M. To 7 :00
P.M. I consider Burke to be a quite street and if such a survey was conducted, I would not hesitate to
guarantee the results would reveal LESS than normal traffic for a "normal" residential street.
Eliminating access to a planned and constructed roadway should NOT, in my opinion, be accomplished
before establishing and verifying the necessity to do so. There must be some standards to be met for this
purpose. This is not to say that there is not an occasional vehicle just "passing" through, or an
occasional speeder. In my opinion, this should be expected on any street, any where. This again, is not
sufficient reason to eliminate access/egress to an existing roadway.
F. The drivers drive up Burke at the same seed they were doing on Pros Why y not? Th e
speed limit is the same. This comment makes no sense as to a justification for a cul-de-sac. If this is a
misprint, and speeding was meant to be the factor, where are the prior recorded complaints? There are
none to my knowledge. Admittedly, there have been incidents of speeding and they have irritated me,
but not to the extent I would request closure of the street. In fact, the occasional speeders I have
noticed were proceeding North bound on White Bear and turned left (West) onto Burke Avenue, the
opposite of what Petitioner alleges. Also, they have negotiated that turn without hesitation or problems.
G. We have youn children &yLn he east end of the street. Their are also children at the West
gat I
end of Burke. What is the point? I would wager that almost ALL streets have children living somewhere
on them. Again, where are any recorded complaints? There are none that I am aware of With regard to
the children mentioned at the East end of Burke, both families have fenced yards and one has a fenced
pool. They are responsible parents. I have personally seen them reprimand their children if seen playing
in the street. Again, I fail to see this as a basis to eliminate access to Burke from White Bear Avenue.
Standards are standard's and I would caution unwarranted approval of cul-de-sac's for fear of the ever
present "Domino Eft-ect."
H. :The third point is another assumption and allegation. If approvals for exceptions to the master
road plans are ever based upon such a basis, I fail to see how any reasonable planner could finalize a
plan before another "What IF" or "I Want" petition came in. Further, at present, the Medical Building is
on hold and Ramsey County is considering changes to White Bear Avenue. In my opinion, if it is not
broken, don't fix it.
I. With respect to a barricade in place of a cul-de-sac, all my reasoning above applies to a negative
response to such a proposal.
J. Another situation to be considered is the increased Punoff flow rate of the improved roadwa- and
any resulting impacts. At present, all runoff flows East and West from the crest in front of my property.
The Westerly flow collects at the intersection at Prosperity and exacerbates the excessive ponding, in
that area. It has been stated that this problem will be addressed but as of now, the letter has not been
delivered. The Easterly flow spills onto White Bear Avenue and drains Southerly to a catch basin across
from the entrance to the Community Center Parking lot. My point here is , constructing a cul-de-sac at
the low end (East) of Burke Avenue will establish a collecting point for excess run off. At present, a
high intensity -short duration downfall can, and frequently does, flood White Bear Avenue and Ryan's
Pond # I which overflows Westerly up to 250 feet which is past my property. This area is now
designated a "wet land." I fear the construction of a cul-de-sac will interrupt and possible collect the
runoff flow, and it will spill over onto the two properties adjacent to the cul-de-sac. The water could be
channeled through to White Bear, however, in the winter with a freeze[thaw cycles, who is going to
assure the channels are open to White Bear Avenue. If the street is maintained as it presently is, when
Ramsey County puts in the necessary storm drain project on White Bear, as they surely will, all that
would be necessary is to construct two catch basins at the intersection which would then connect to the
storm drain. This would also negate the need for any storm sewer on the Easterly section of Burke
Avenue. Although it does not affect me, I fear the snow plowing of the proposed cul-de-sac will
severely impact the two properties adjacent to the cul-de-sac.
K. There can be no doubt that a cul-de-sac will be disruptive to the existing traffic flow pattern. It
would affect all residents, their guests, delivery vehicles, snow plowing equipment, and all service and
emergency vehicles. Since I have lived here, I have had occasion to call the Para Medics 13 or 14 times.
The majority of the time, they arrived at the house from White Bear Avenue. The necessity for these
calls is no longer a factor but it does illustrate the point that "time is of the essence" in an emergency
situation and a cul-de-sac would block this East access to Burke Avenue. If there was excessive non-
resident use, speeding, and/or accidents as alleged, I would readily support the Petition. However, it is
obvious from my remarks, I do NOT see any justification for such support.
4. While I was not able to be at the council meeting when the Petition was presented, I was able to view
the cable re-run. I was also dismayed to receive this Resident Survey for Project 07-15, The revised
cul-de-sac plan, which has been revised further, was a complete surprise. However, what is done is
done. .
With regard to the presentation of the petition, I do not have a transcript so I can not analyze it for
adequacy as it would only result in further disagreement with the facts presented. To me, it was an
impassioned plea, introducing many additional unsupported alleged facts which have no basis in fact.
I must say that I have NEVER heard squealing brakes, seen numerous accidents, or drivers speeding
around comers. Neither has the Maplewood Police Department as evi denced by their Strip Report.
5. in conclusion and to summarize:
A. Reasons stated in a Petition for a cul-de-sac should stand up under scrutiny as to the facts stated.
I do not believe this one does.
B. Petitions requesting construction or changes in traffic flow patterns should be evaluated against
established plans, specifications, Master Plans, and City Codes. Exceptions should be minimized and
provide validated justification for approval. I fully realize that the City Council should not become
involved or attempt to resolve personal disputes amongst neighbors. I am not asking for any of that, At
M
C. I see no basis for approving, this Petition and strongly urge it be denied.
D. in view of the 'increased traffic on White Bear Avenue, and the prospect of a continuing increase,
I would not object to a NO LEFT TURN sign be posted and enforced for the North bound White Bear
Avenue traffic to prohibit a left turn (West) onto Burke Avenue. Prior to implementation, I would
expect the necessity for such signage would be deemed necessary by Ramsey County or Maplewood
Officials as a "necessary" Safety measure.
E. In my opinion, there is NO requirement to make the one block segment of Burke Avenue from
Prosperity to White Bear Avenue a PRIVATE road. If people have problems making turns onto White
Bear Avenue, they have the option to do what they would have to do if the cul-de-sac or blockade were
constructed. If ever a Traffic Count Survey on Burke Avenue substantiated the assumptions and
allegations in this Petition, I would most seriously reconsider my response.
F. If the cul-de-sac is denied, the Easterly access to Burke Avenue will remain open which will
facilitate the planned use of Burke Avenue for residents, guests, delivery vehicles, snow plowing
equipment, and all service and emergency vehicles. In addition, any costs associated with the
construction of the cul-de-sac will be saved, snowplowing will be easier, and connection to the future
White Bear storm sewer system will be simplified.
6. Should anyone have any questions or wish to discuss anything in this reply, I will make myself
available at their convenience.
Respectfully Submitted,
Willard F. Frantz
Encl. (1) Maplewood Police Department Ad-dress Report
I
Addmss Strip Report
Complaint
Occur Date & Time
Address
Incd
Disposition
07003758
03/03/2007 10:13:56
1647 BURKE AV
ASS-ASSIST CITIZEN CALLS, ALL
ADV
07004458
03114=07 13:29:00
1669 BURKE AV
FRAUD-UNAUTHORIZED USE OF CREDIT
CARD
RR
05011672
07/11=0516:10:23
1669 BURKE AV
ASS-ASSIST FIREIAMBULANCE
MEDF
04021372
121111200421:38:40
1669 BURKE AV
DISTURBANCE-DISTURBANCE CALLS
FC
06009821
06/05/200610:45:00
1675 BURK& AV
ASSAULT-THREATS W/O WEAPON,NON-
RR
05018666
1011=005 23:36:49
PROSPERITY RD BURKE
TERRORISTIC
1011&2005 1938:11
05015128
08128/200519:30:00
1708 BURKE AV
DOMESTICS
RR
06016599 09/11/2005 13:20:00 BURKE AV PROSPERITY
06013429 07126/2006 23:39:00 BURKE AV PROSPERITY
06001 120 Olr=M 19:31 :57 BURKE AV PROSPERITY
07012133 07103/2007 01:67.00 BURKE AV WHITE BEAR
07008178 05/08/2007 10.44:00 BURKE AV WHITE BEAR
OSD✓3487
12AM0062015
BURKE AV WHrrE BEAR
06022340
12/1112006 0 00
BURKE AV WHITE BEAR
06DO7954
0509r2M 00:24
BURKE AV WHITE BEAR
06005552
04103ifs. #K 00
BURKE AV WHrrE BEAR
OSOM42
1025rAN IS10 - 00
BURKE AV WHITE BEAR
05008217
05)23=0 2313:00
BURKE AV WHITE BEAR
06•293
03 - IS Q005 00:15
BURKE AV WHITE BEAR
07014274
071=00716
PROSPERITY RD BURKE
07004017
03/071200710:18:31
PROSPERITY RD BURKE
OSW2570
02fl3MM % 03
PROSPERITY R
05018666
1011=005 23:36:49
PROSPERITY RD BURKE
05018395
1011&2005 1938:11
PROSPERITY RD BURKE
TRAFFIC ACCIDENT-PROPERTY DAMAGE RR
INVESTIGATE AND ALL OTHER
RR
TRAFFIC VIOLATION -OTHER MOVING
OOA
TRAFFIC VIOLATION
DWI-GM.REFUSAL
RR
VIOLATION-DRIVING AFTER
RR
. TRAFFIC
SUSPENSION
TRAFFIC VIOLATION-DRIVING AFTER
RR
SUSPENSION
TRAFFIC VIOLATION -NO INSURANCE
RR
TRAFFIC VIOLATION-OTHER MOVING
FC
TRAFFIC VIOLATION
TRAFFIC VIOLATION-GM .DRIVING AFTER
RR
CANCELLATION
TRAFFIC VIOLATION-DRIVING AFTER
RR
SUSPENSION
TRAFFIC VIOLATION-DRIVING AFTER
RR
REVOCATION
TRAFFIC VIOLATION-NO INSURANCE
RR
TRAFFIC- STOP /ADVISE
FC
TRAFFIC VIOLATION-OTHER MOVING
FC
TRAFFIC VIOLATION
TRAFFIC VIOLATION-OTHER MOVING
FC
TRAFFIC VIOLATION
TRAFFIC VIOLATION-OTHER MOVING
FC
TRAFFIC VIOLATION
TRAFFIC VIOLATION-OTHER MOVING
FC
TRAFFIC VIOLATION
lnfbrmation requested by: (4704) 1 Printed at - 07/31/2007 15:391,21
!I �ci �— —
I ICI 71
O �m
rd
I
z I �� > U C') z — ® r o
�� 1 F F
XI II r z - - - -- — -
il,
c
11 rn � 307 8R �- - -�
7,x I
BA
z I
N
N I I
Cl) r WOOD WALL
m D X I o
x I o�mo
m D z z
0 ED 03
X ��) ;u m
U
o �
N
O
z \ f z Cn
El ((r
�i �o
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Planner
SUBJECTS: Code Amendment -Planning Commission
DATE: August 23
City staff, the city manager and the city attorney have reviewed the current city code
about the duties of the planning commission and the planning commission's rules of
procedure. They determined that some minor changes were necessary to the city code
and to the rules of procedure to reflect the current practices of the City. As such, staff
has prepared a code amendment for the sections of the code about the planning
commission. Staff also is working on s8p8n8ie report about their nJ|8G of procedure.
lKeftlellikill
On March 12,2007 staff requested that the city council allow staff to review and
amend the planning commission's rules Ofprocedure. City council directed city staff and
the planning commission to make the recommended changes to the planning
commission ordinance and rules of procedure and then to bring the items back to city
council for review.
DISCUSSION
Code Amendments
Staff determined that a few amendments to the city ordinance about the planning
commission were necessary to make them consistent with the recent direction of the city
manager and to be consistent with current city staff organization. The proposed changes
include the following:
Sec. 2-249. Chairperson and vice-chairperson. — The election Of@ chairperson and
vice-chairperson now occurs annually 8Lthe second planning commission meeting in
January. This does not a||Ovv all of the COnonoisSiOn members to vote On these
appointments because two of the commission members terms expire annually. The
proposed Cnd8 as shown in attachment 1 (page four) changes the election k} the first
meeting in June annually, thus enabling all commission members tOvote.
Sec. 2-251. Officers; meetings; rules of procedure . — SUaffinpvnpominQanadditionto
the proposed code about meeting times for the planning commission. The newly added
section (s88 page four) allows for meeting times to be in conjunction with the availability
of city facilities and the meeting times Cf other groups aS directed Uy the city manager.
Sec. 2-254. Responsibilities of community development director. —As directed bvthe
city manager, the title of this section needed iob8 changed k] reflect current
organization of the departments within the city. In addition, staff is proposing to change
CVnnnnVnib/ development director to City planning staff throughout this section (see page
COMMISSION ACTION
[xl July 1Y.20UY. the planning commission recommended approval Vf the proposed
code change.
Approve the first reading of the proposed code amendment starting on page three. This
amendment changes Sections 2-248 through 2-255Of the city code about the planning
CVrnnn|SsiVn.
P:\(PC) Planning Commission Code Amendment Memo 07(l)
Attachments
1. Proposed City Code Amendment - Planning Commission
2
Attachment 1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING DIVISION 4. PLANNING COMMISSION
The Maplewood city council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed 0Ut):
DIVISION 4. PLANNING COMMISSION*
Sec. 2-246. Established.
The city council establishes for the city a planning commission as an advisory
board to the city council, as provided in Minn. Stots. §§462.351-462.3S4.
(Code 1982.§ 25-17)
Sec. 2-247. Advisory body; exceptions.
All actions of the advisory planning commission shall be in the nature of
recommendations to the city council, and the commission shall have no final authority
about any matters, except 8s the council may lawfully delegate authority LOit.
(Code 1S82.G25-18\
State law reference— City planning agency to be advisory, except as otherwise
provided by state statute or charter, Minn. St8ts. 8 462.354 GUbd. 1.
Sec. 2-248. Composition; appointment; qualifications; terms.
(@) The planning COrnnniS3iOn Sh8]| have nine nlen1b8[3 appointed by the city
COUnCi|. The members shall bR residents Of the city and may not hold GO
elected city public office. When pVssib|e, the council shall select commission
members tO represent the various areas Of the city and tO help meet the
needs of the residents.
(b) The city council shall appoint 080b800fth8DlanDirg commission for three-
year t8rnls. The city Gh8U divide the membership into three groups of three
members each. The terms of the three members in the same group shall
end in the same year. |f the appointment isto fill 8 vacancy, the appointment
would b8tV finish the unexpired part of the vacated terms. All terms shall
expire On December 31 of the year in which the appointment ends.
(Code 1982.§25-19)
Sec. 2-249. Chairperson and vice-chairperson.
The planning commission shall elect a chairperson and a vice-chairperson each
year during the first plannina commission meetinci in June. at the seGGRd p
The chairperson shall be responsible for
calling and presiding at meetings and shall have an equal vote with other members of
the commission. |f the chairperson iS not 8ta meeting, the vice-chairperson shall
assume the duties Vf the chairperson for that meeting. |f the chairperson resigns from Or
is otherwise no longer on the planning commission, the vice-chairperson shall become
the acting chairperson until the planning commission can hold an election for new
officers.
(Code 19R2.§ 25-20)
*State law references—K8unidpo| planning, Minn. Stots. §4G2.351 edSeq.; city
planning @08noy. Minn. Gtota. § 462.354. SUbd. 1; D1etR]DV|it@D gVve[ODl8Dt Minn. 8L8tS
ch. 473; Ramsey County included within "metropolitan area" over which "metropolitan
council" has jurisdiction, Minn. 8t@tS.G473.121 SUbdS. 2 3; D1etn]pV|it@0 land use
planning, Minn. St8tS.
8473.851etseq.
ADMINISTRATION
Sec. 2-250' Vacancies.
(a) Any of the following may cause the office of8 planning commissioner to
become vacated:
M\ Death Vr removal from the city.
(2) Disability or failure to S8rv8. as Sh0vvO by failure t0 attend four [n8RtiOgS in
any year, may be cause for removal bvcouncil majority, Un|8ssQVod
cause can be shown tO the council.
(3) Resignation in writing.
(4) Taking public office in the city.
(b) Vacancies shall be filled by the council for the unexpired portion of the
vacated term. (Code 1882.825-21)
Sec. 2-251. Officers; meetings; rules of procedure.
(a) The planning commission shall elect its own officers, establish meeting
times in coNunction with the availability of city facilities and the meeting
times of other groups as directed by the city manager, and adopt its own
rules of procedure to be reviewed and approved by the city council.
4
(b) All meetings ofthe planning commission shall b9 open bJ the public.
Sec. 2-252. Duties and responsibilities.
The planning conlrniSsk]n Sh8U have the duty to:
(1) Prepare and recommend o comprehensive plan of development for the
city.
/2\ Conduct hearings and make recommendations ho the city council about
the adoption 0f the city comprehensive plan and any amendments
thereto. The comprehensive plan certified and adopted by the city council
shall be recognized 8S the city's official comprehensive plan.
(3) Study and make recommendations to the city council about implementing
the comprehensive plan and any land use regulations.
(4) Study and make recommendations to the city council about zoning code
amendments.
(5) Review, prepare and make 8 report tO the city council bv the second city
council meeting |n February of each year regarding the commission's
activities in the past year and major projects for the new year.
(6) Maintain 8 liaison and coordination with government and private agencies
SV that the city council may b8 familiar with the planning activities of such
agencies in order t0 establish @n order of planning and development unity
for the city.
(7) Review and recommend, OnOr before June 3O0f each year, ocapital
improvements program tV the city council, which is designed b]
accomplish the comprehensive plan for the city.
(8) Review and make recommendations k} the city council ondevelopment
applications, such oSrezOningS. conditional use permits, variances,
vacations, preliminary plats and home occupation licenses.
(0) Accept such other and further duties @S may, from time tO time, b8
directed bv the city council, including conducting hearings.
(Code 1082.Q25-23\
Sec. 2-253. Compensation; expenses.
All members of the planning commission shall serve without compensation.
However, approved expenses of the planning commission shall be paid from available
Sec. 2-254. Responsibilities of city planning staff Gommui;ity develepmeR4
Subject to the direct of the city manager, the planning commission and its
chairperson, the city planning staff GGMMURity deVelOpMeRt diFeGtG shall:
(1) Conduct all correspondence Of the commission.
C2\ Send out all required notices.
(3) Attend all meetings and hearings of the commission.
(4) Keep the dockets and minutes of the cOnnnni3SiOn'S proceedings.
(5) Keep all required records and files.
(6) Maintain the files and indexes of the commission.
Sec. 2-255. Duties of city engineer city attorney city inspectors mndmkhercity
(a) The city engineer and the city attorney shall b8 available LV the planning
SOnnrnisai0n. The city engineer and attorney sha have the right tn sit in
with the commission 8t all meetings, but shall not b8 entitled LVvote as
members of the commission.
(b) All city inspectors and other regular employees or personnel of the city
shall cooperate with the planning commission and make themselves
available and attend meetings when requested tOd0so.
(Code 1S82.§25-2W)
Secs. 2-256-2-280. Reserved'
This ordinance shall take effect after publishing in the official newspaper.
The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 2007.
Attest:
City Clerk
Mayor
�
AGENDA NO. 1 -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance and Administration Manager
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: August 17, 2007
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills
and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
I�lT�l�ffi► ' • i
$ - No accounts payable checks were
processed during this report period.
$ 169,324.80 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 08102107 thru 08/09/07
$ 1,322,925.54 Checks # 73312 thru # 73401
dated 08/07/07 thru 08/21/07
$ 324,201.13 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 08/10/07 thru 08/16/07
$ 1,816,451.47 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$ 511,623.81 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 08 /10 /07
$ 2,624.27 Payroll Deduction check # 1002820 thru # 1002822
dated 08/10/07
$ 514,248.08 Total Payroll
$ 2,330,699.55 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651- 249 -2903 if you have any questions on the
attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary.
ds
attachments
S: \CTY_CLRK\Agenda Lists and Reports 2007\Agenda Reports \08- 27 -07 \I1 Approval of Claims
CITY OF MAPLEVVOOD
Disbursements via Debits bu Checking account
Transmitted
Date
O8/O1/O7
O8/U1/07
U8/O2/07
U8/O2/0T
U8/O2/O7
O8/U3/0T
U8/OG/07
U8/O7/0T
O8/O7/O7
O8/O8/07
Settlement
Date
O0O2/O
O8/O2/0
U8/O3/07
08/O3/0T
O8/03/O7
O8/UG/07
U8/O7/07
U8/OO/0T
O8/O8/O7
O8/OS/0T
Payee
MN State Treasurer
ARC Administration
MN State Treasurer
MN Dept of Natural Resources
yNN Dept ofRevenue
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
US Bank VISA One Card*
MN State Treasurer
1�
Description Amount
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar
DCRP& Flex plan payments
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar
DNR electronic licenses
Fuel Tax
Drivers Limanae/DeputyReQimtror
Drivers Lioenae/OeputyRegio\nar
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar
Purchasing card items
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar
*Detailed listing of VISA purchases iaattached.
24,523.65
4,485.00
17,030.57
803.50
242.40
18.768.81
18,687.13
19,503.80
53,079.94
12,200.00
Visa Transactions Posted from 07/23/2007 to 08/03/07
Trans Date
Posting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
07/20/07
07/23/07
FACTORY CARD OUTLET #284
$79.98
MANDY ANZALDI
07/20/07
07/23/07
SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
$44.62
JIM BEHAN
07/25/07
07/26/07
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$55.28
JIM BEHAN
07126/07
07/30/07
AQUA LOGIC INC
$12.78
JIM BEHAN
07/27/07
07/30/07
ELECTRIC MOTOR REAPIR
$458.06
JIM BEHAN
07/30/07
08/01/07
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$233.24
JIM BEHAN
07/31/07
08/01/07
NORTHSHORE CARE SUPPLY
$398.00
JIM BEHAN
08102/07
08103/07
DIAPER DECK & COMPANY
$227.68
JIM BEHAN
07127/07
07/30/07
EAT INC
$82.32
RON BOURQUIN
07/30/07
07/31/07
CONCRETE FORM ENGINEERS
$423.44
TROY BRINK
07/30/07
07/31/07
UNITED RENTALS #D09
$16.83
TROY BRINK
08102/07
08/03/07
CONCRETE FORM ENGINEERS
$85.60
TROY BRINK
07/20/07
07/23/07
INNOVATIVE COLOR PRINTING
$378.61
HEIDI CAREY
07/24/07
07/25/07
FONT BROTHERS INC.
$23.43
HEIDI CAREY
07/27/07
07/30/07
DEX EAST - LOCKBOX
$35.95
HEIDI CAREY
07/30/07
08101/07
PRESS PUBLICATIONS
$143.94
HEIDI CAREY
07/30/07
08/01/07
INNOVATIVE COLOR PRINTING
$42.30
HEIDI CAREY
07/20/07
07/23/07
THE HOME DEPOT 2810
$72.29
CHARLES DEAVER
07/24/07
07/25/07
MENARDS 3022
$28.86
CHARLES DEAVER
07125/07
07/27/07
THE HOME DEPOT 2810
($72.29)
CHARLES DEAVER
07/26/07
07/30/07
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
($5.29)
CHARLES DEAVER
07/26/07
07/30/07
MICHAELS #9401
$7.47
CHARLES DEAVER
07/26/07
07/30/07
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$21.84
CHARLES DEAVER
07131/07
08102 /07
RAINBOW FOODS 00088526
$13.13
CHARLES DEAVER
08101/07
08/02/07
MENARDS 3022
$22.44
CHARLES DEAVER
08/01/07
08/03/07
BREEZY POINT RESORT /RES -C
$525.00
ROBERT J DOLLERSCHELL
07/23/07
07/24/07
MOGREN LANDSCAPE SUPPLY L
$74.55
DOUG EDGE
07130/07
07/31/07
ICI- DULUX- PAINTS #0092
$1,479.92
DAVE EDSON
08/02/07
08/03/07
MENARDS 3059
$15.91
DAVE EDSON
07/30/07
07/31/07
PANERA BREAD #1305
$441.63
THOMAS G EKSTRAND
07/20/07
07/23/07
IAI *IDEA ART
$610.44
LARRY FARR
07/22/07
07123/07
KOHL'S #0055
$77.97
LARRY FARR
07/23/07
07/24/07
WW GRAINGER 501
$779.85
LARRY FARR
07/23/07
07/25/07
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$29.82
LARRY FARR
07/24/07
07/26/07
TWIN CITY HARDWARE HALE
$826.68
LARRY FARR
07124/07
07/30/07
CRAMER BLDG SERVICES INC
$1,576.26
LARRY FARR
07/26/07
07/27/07
COMMERCIAL FURNITURE SRVC
$106.50
LARRY FARR
08/01/07
08/02/07
TARGET 00021352
$119.40
LARRY FARR
08/02/07
08/03/07
WMS *WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY
$359.04
LARRY FARR
08102/07
08103/07
WMS *WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY
$442.83
LARRY FARR
08102/07
08/03/07
WMS *WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY
$904.82
LARRY FARR
08/02/07
08/03/07
FINAL TOUCH SERVICES INC
$207.68
LARRY FARR
08/02/07
08/03/07
FINAL TOUCH SERVICES INC
$239.63
LARRY FARR
08102/07
08/03/07
MENARDS 3022
$519.17
LARRY FARR
07/20/07
07/23/07
CRAGUNS LODGE AND GOLF RE
$188.60
DAVID FISHER
07/20/07
07/23/07
CRAGUNS LODGE AND GOLF RE
$188.60
DAVID FISHER
08/02/07
08/03/07
SCIENCE MUSEUM RAMP
$5.00
DAVID FISHER
07/24/07
07125/07
ASSET RECOVERY CORP
$57.73
MYCHAL FOWLDS
07/24/07
07/26/07
SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES
$180.00
MYCHAL FOWLDS
07/24/07
07/26/07
SPRINT PCS- 995 -SP WEB
$399.45
MYCHAL FOWLDS
07/25/07
07/26/07
ATT* SERVICE
$1,013.60
MYCHAL FOWLDS
07125/07
07/26/07
QWESTCOMM *TN651
$66.45
MYCHAL FOWLDS
07/25/07
07/26/07
GOVDOCS.COM, INC.
$410.00
MYCHAL FOWLDS
07/30/07
08/01/07
INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTORS
$1,230.61
MYCHAL FOWLDS
07/30/07
08/02/07
IRONKEY.COM
$345.77
NICK FRANZEN
07119/07
07123/07
OFFICE DEPOT #1090
$11.19
PATRICIA FRY
07125/07
07/26/07
WWW CHARITYBOX COM
$70.40
VIRGINIA GAYNOR
07/19/07
07/23/07
STREAMLINE DESIGN INC
$336.00
MIKE GRAF
07/20/07
07/23/07
SPRINT AQUATICS
$178.92
MIKE GRAF
3
Visa Transactions Posted from 07/23/2007 to 08/03/07
Trans Date
07/25/07
07/19/07
07/21/07
07126/07
07/26/07
07/30/07
07/19/07
07119/07
07126/07
07/29/07
07/19/07
07/23/07
07/30/07
08/01/07
07/27/07
08/02/07
07/26/07
07/30/07
08/01/07
07126/07
07/25/07
07/23/07
07/23/07
07126/07
07127/07
07/27/07
07/27/07
07/31/07
07/20/07
07/24/07
07/25/07
08/01/07
08/02/07
07/30/07
07/31/07
08/01/07
07/20/07
07/20/07
07/24/07
07125/07
07127/07
07/27/07
07/27/07
07/27/07
07/31/07
08/01/07
08/01/07
08/02/07
07/25/07
07/20/07
07/31/07
08/01/07
08/01/07
07/22/07
07/28/07
07131/07
08102/07
08/01/07
07/20/07
Posting Date
07/26/07
07/23/07
07/23/07
07/27/07
07/30/07
07/31/07
07/23/07
07123/07
07/30/07
08/01/07
07/23/07
07/24/07
08/01/07
08/03/07
07/30/07
08103/07
07/30/07
07/31/07
08/03/07
07/30/07
07/30/07
07/24/07
07/25/07
07130/07
07/30/07
07/30/07
07/30/07
08/01/07
07/23/07
07/25/07
07/26/07
08103/07
08/03/07
07/31/07
08/02/07
08/03/07
07/23/07
07/23/07
07/26/07
07127/07
07/30/07
07/30/07
07/30/07
07/30/07
08/02/07
08/03/07
08/03/07
08103/07
07/26/07
07/23/07
08/02/07
08/02/07
08/03/07
07/23/07
07/30/07
08/01/07
08/03/07
08/02/07
07/23/07
Merchant Name
SPRINT AQUATICS
CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03
VERIZON WRLS M3097 -01
NORTHWEST LASERS INC
CATCO PARTS &SERVICE
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
CUSTOMER SUPT CENTER
OFFICE DEPOT #1090
THE STAR TRIBUNE CIRCULAT
APEX MANAGEMENT SERVICES
SANDY'S SEWING DEN
MENARDS 3059
OFFICE MAX
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
AMERICAN RED CROS01 OF 01
TARGET 00011858
U OF M PARKING AND TRANS
METRO SALES INC
DE LAGS LANDEN OP01 OF 01
CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
UNITED RENTALS #D09
VANCE BROTHERS INC
MAGAZINE LINE
OXYGEN
MICHAELS #2744
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
VZWRLSS *APOCC VISN
REED BUS INFO ACCT REC
LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE
ARVEY PAPER & OFFICE PRO
RAPID PACKAGING
CTO *GOTOMYPC.COM
MENARDS 3022
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
MICHAELS #2744
EAT INC
CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPM
AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL
OVERHEAD DOOR OF NORTH
RAINBOW FOODS 00088617
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL
ASPEN MILLS 8005717343
BREEZY POINT RESORT /RES -C
ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC
NAPA AUTO PARTS LITTLE CA
GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPME
THE TESSMAN COMPANY
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
ON SITE SANITATION INC
QW ESTCOMM *TN651
COMCAST CABLE COMM
LISPS 2663650015
FSH COMMUNICATION01 OF 01
METROCALL ARCH WIRE
CINTAS FIRST AID #431
Trans Amount
($1.16)
$27.25
($15.96)
$123.05
$26.58
$1.59
$746.90
$185.95
$112.58
$150.00
$210.83
($29.81)
$20.10
$29.38
$661.00
$99.62
$8.00
$1,697.37
$206.61
$8.20
$729.40
$254.84
$273.17
$77.94
$19.97
$31.28
$63.71
$66.79
$356.80
$2,311.87
$2,000.00
$68.83
$19.95
$48.43
$16.38
$12.03
$18.00
$289.94
$414.09
$250.15
$13.39
$1,428.36
$1,177.03
$1,170.52
$1,124.43
$44.95
$525.00
$68.16
$31.89
$134.12
$551.06
$157.39
$1,079.04
$57.79
$117.35
$10.00
$63.90
$15.93
$54.98
Name
MIKE GRAF
KAREN E GUILFOILE
KAREN E GUILFOILE
MARK HAAG
MARK HAAG
MARK HAAG
LORI HANSON
LORI HANSOM
LORI HANSON
LORI HANSON
PATRICK HEFFERNAN
PATRICK HEFFERNAN
PATRICK HEFFERNAN
RICK HERLUND
RON HORWATH
RON HORWATH
ANN E HUTCHINSON
ANN E HUTCHINSON
ANN E HUTCHINSON
SCOTTJACOBSON
DAVID JAHN
DON JONES
DON JONES
MARY B KOEHNEN
MARY B KOEHNEN
MARY B KOEHNEN
MARY B KOEHNEN
DUWAYNE KONEWKO
LISA KROLL
LISA KROLL
LISA KROLL
LISA KROLL
ERIN M LABEREE
DENNIS LINDORFF
DENNIS LINDORFF
DENNIS LINDORFF
STEVE LUKIN
STEVE LUKIN
STEVE LUKIN
STEVE LUKIN
STEVE LUKIN
STEVE LUKIN
STEVE LUKIN
STEVE LUKIN
STEVE LUKIN
STEVE LUKIN
STEVE LUKIN
STEVE LUKIN
GORDON MALLORY
MARK MARUSKA
MARK MARUSKA
MARK MARUSKA
MARK MARUSKA
ROBERT MITTET
ROBERT MITTET
ROBERT MITTET
ROBERT MITTET
ED NADEAU
BRYAN NAGEL
Il
Visa Transactions Posted from 07/23/2007 to 08/03/07
Trans Date
08/02/07
07/24/07
07/25/07
07/24/07
08/01/07
07/23/07
07/23/07
07126/07
07127/07
07/27/07
07/21/07
07/23/07
07/25/07
07/27/07
07/31/07
08/01/07
08/02/07
07/20/07
07/23/07
07130/07
08/01/07
07/25/07
07/26/07
07119/07
07119/07
07/19/07
07/20/07
07/23/07
07/25/07
07/25/07
07/25/07
07/25/07
07/25/07
07/25/07
07/26/07
07126/07
07/27/07
07/30/07
07/30/07
07130/07
07131/07
08/01/07
08/02/07
07126/07
07/31/07
08/02/07
08/01/07
07/20/07
07/30/07
07/19/07
07/20/07
07/23/07
07/26/07
07/27/07
07/30/07
08101/07
08102/07
07/23/07
07/23/07
Posting Date
08/03/07
07/25/07
07/25/07
07/26/07
08/02/07
07/25/07
07/25/07
07130/07
07/30/07
07/30/07
07/23/07
07/24/07
07/26/07
07/30/07
08/01/07
08102/07
08/03/07
07/23/07
07/24/07
08/01/07
08/03/07
07/27/07
07/30/07
07123/07
07/23/07
07/23/07
07/23/07
07/26/07
07/26/07
07/26/07
07/27/07
07127/07
07/27/07
07/27/07
07/27/07
07/27/07
07/30/07
07/31/07
08/02/07
08102/07
08/01/07
08/03/07
08/03/07
07/30/07
08/01/07
08/03/07
08/02/07
07123/07
08 /02/07
07/23/07
07/23/07
07/25/07
07/27/07
07/30/07
08/01/07
08103/07
08 /03/07
07/25/07
07/25/07
Merchant Name
EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO.
RON'S VIRTUE PRINTI
OFFICE DEPOT REBILL
OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER
TRI STATE BOBCAT
OFFICE MAX
PARTY AMERICA 1008
OFFICE DEPOT #1090
OFFICE DEPOT #1090
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
PAYPAL *METALDETECT
PAYPAL *METALDETECT
MEDCO SUPPLY
GRAFIX SHOPPE
SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABO
SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABO
TARGET 00011858
ALLINA EMGERGENCY MED ED
BATTERY TECH CENTRAL
OFFICE MAX
MILLS FLEET FARM #27
METRO SALES INC
OFFICE MAX
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
RUFFRIDGE - JOHNSON EQUIP
PERFORMANCE TRANSMI
TURF WORKS FEI EAST
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
SCHELEN GRAY AUTO ELECT
DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY
TURF WORKS FEI EAST
BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
WINTER EQUIPMENT CO INC
AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPL
CR FIRST NATL 33200023
SOI *SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
BAUER BULT TRE33200023
SHRED -IT 01 OF 01
HEALTHEAST TRANSPORTATN
ACCURINT EOM AUTO P
WONDERLIC
HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
MICHAELS #2744
CUB FOODS, INC.
HOLLYWOOD VIDEO
TARGET 00011858
CUB FOODS, INC.
WILD MTN. & TAYLORS
WILD MOUNTAIN
TARGET 00011858
OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER
THE OLIVE GARD00012005
Trans Amount
$616.92
$223.93
$56.97
$169.34
$174.75
$45.78
$21.95
$21.90
$107.25
$26.59
$318.91
($318.91)
$76.47
$360.00
$189.03
$107.21
$70.07
$55.00
$108.50
$22.35
$17.16
$279.02
$24.47
$36.75
$115.79
$192.05
$50.76
$93.65
$154.65
$440.48
$23.19
$63.29
$20.63
$352.03
$100.48
$24.26
$683.17
$1,111.71
$102.61
$424.40
$169.55
$77.99
$116.63
$106.56
$931.11
$30.00
$462.96
$1,999.15
$576.18
$118.15
$34.93
$4.25
$121.74
$23.73
$60.00
$964.90
$63.25
$179.99
$142.23
Name
BRYAN NAGEL
AMY NIVEN
AMY NIVEN
ERICK OSWALD
ERICK OSWALD
MARY KAY PALANK
MARY KAY PALANK
MARY KAY PALANK
MARY KAY PALANK
ROBERT PETERSON
PHILIP F POWELL
PHILIP F POWELL
PHILIP F POWELL
PHILIP F POWELL
PHILIP F POWELL
PHILIP F POWELL
PHILIP F POWELL
ROBERT PRECHTEL
ROBERT PRECHTEL
ROBERT PRECHTEL
ROBERT PRECHTEL
WILLIAM J PRIEFER
WILLIAM J PRIEFER
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
STEVEN PRIEM
KEVIN RABBETT
KEVIN RABBETT
KEVIN RABBETT
TERRIE RAMEAUX
MICHAEL REILLY
MICHAEL REILLY
AUDRA ROBBINS
AUDRA ROBBINS
AUDRA ROBBINS
AUDRA ROBBINS
AUDRA ROBBINS
AUDRA ROBBINS
AUDRA ROBBINS
AUDRA ROBBINS
ROBERT RUNNING
HARRIET J RYDEL
Visa Transactions Posted from 07/23/2007 to 08/03/07
Trans Date
Posting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
07/24/07
07/25/07
THE UPS STORE #2171
$10.28
HARRIET J RYDEL
07/24/07
07/26/07
OFFICE DEPOT #1090
$80.14
HARRIET J RYDEL
07/30/07
07/31/07
OFFICE DEPOT #1090
$27.18
HARRIET J RYDEL
07130/07
07/31/07
OFFICE DEPOT #1090
$20.99
HARRIET J RYDEL
08/01/07
08/02/07
GE CAPITAL
$43.67
HARRIET J RYDEL
07/25/07
07/27/07
CARQUEST 01021104
$34.14
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
07/31/07
08/01/07
MENARDS 3022
$17.87
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
08101/07
08103/07
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$39.33
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
07119/07
07/23/07
INTOXIMETERS, INC.
$288.90
MICHAEL SHORTREED
07/20/07
07/23/07
LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGET
$131.61
MICHAEL SHORTREED
07/23/07
07/25/07
LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGET
$60.99
MICHAEL SHORTREED
07124/07
07/26/07
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
$67.63
MICHAEL SHORTREED
07/24/07
07/26/07
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
$98.99
MICHAEL SHORTREED
07/26/07
07/27/07
ABIKESTORE.COM
$89.88
MICHAEL SHORTREED
07/28/07
07/30/07
U OF M CCE
$75.00
MICHAEL SHORTREED
08/01/07
08102/07
JOHN E REID & ASSOC INC
$150.00
MICHAEL SHORTREED
08/02/07
08/03/07
RICHFIELD BUS CO.
$372.00
ANDREA SINDT
07/23/07
07/24/07
LOFFLER COMPANIES INC
$266.03
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
08/01/07
08/02/07
T- MOBILE RECURRING PMT
$135.91
DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN
07127/07
07/30/07
MICHAELS #2744
$14.13
JAMES TAYLOR
07/26/07
07/30/07
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$11.15
TODD TEVLIN
07/24/07
07/26/07
OUTBACK #2420
$18.54
SUSAN ZWIEG
07/25/07
07/27/07
ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER IN
$199.00
SUSAN ZWIEG
07125/07
07127/07
OUTBACK #2420
$25.89
SUSAN ZW I EG
07125/07
07/27/07
GRANDMAS SALOON & GRIL
$13.60
SUSAN ZWIEG
07/26/07
07/30/07
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
$546.35
SUSAN ZWIEG
07/26/07
07/30/07
GRANDMAS SALOON & GRIL
$15.34
SUSAN ZWIEG
07127/07
07/30/07
COUNTRY INN & SUITES HERM
$186.20
SUSAN ZWIEG
07/29/07
07/30/07
PAPA JOHNS #1838
$80.67
SUSAN ZWIEG
07/30/07
07/31/07
AE SIGN SYSTEMS
$76.68
SUSAN ZWIEG
07/30/07
07/31/07
MENARDS 3059
$13.82
SUSAN ZWIEG
07/31/07
08103/07
WORKPLACEPRO COM
$128.30
SUSAN ZWIEG
08/01/07
08/03/07
BREEZY POINT RESORT /RES -C
$525.00
SUSAN ZWIEG
0
Check Register
City of Maplewood
08/17/2007
Check
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount
73312
08/07/2007
00152
JOHN BANICK
PER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
29,701.60
73313
08/1412007
01283
POST BOARD
POLICE OFFICER LICENSE
90.00
73314
08/1612007
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REFUND B SELBY - DAYCAMP
161.00
73315
08/2112007
00463
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
REPAIR AMB MEDIC 2
2,380.42
0812112007
00463
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
REPAIR ENGINE 1
2,064.18
73316
08/2112007
01973
ERICKSON OIL PRODUCTS INC
CAR WASHES - JULY
102.24
73317
0812112007
03576
EUREKA RECYCLING
RECYCLING -AUGUST
18,365.49
73318
0812112007
00519
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO.
VIDEO CABLE REAIR KIT & LABOR
458.96
73319
0812112007
01949
GARY L FISCHLER & ASSOC PA
CANDIDATE SCREEN
275.00
08/2112007
01949
GARY L FISCHLER & ASSOC PA
CANDIDATE SCREEN
275.00
08/2112007
01949
GARY L FISCHLER & ASSOC PA
CANDIDATE SCREEN
275.00
08/2112007
01949
GARY L FISCHLER & ASSOC PA
CANDIDATE SCREEN
275.00
0812112007
01949
GARY L FISCHLER & ASSOC PA
CANDIDATE SCREEN
275.00
08/2112007
01949
GARY L FISCHLER & ASSOC PA
CANDIDATE SCREEN
275.00
0812112007
01949
GARY L FISCHLER & ASSOC PA
CANDIDATE SCREEN
275.00
73320
0812112007
00687
HUGO'S TREE CARE INC
STORM DAMAGE TREE TRIMMING
465.94
73321
0812112007
02728
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
PROJ 06 -16 PROF SRVS THRU 6130
41,608.99
08/2112007
02728
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
PROJ 04 -21 PROF SRVS THRU 6/30
13,193.04
08/2112007
02728
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
PROJ 07 -15 PROF SRVS THRU 6130
9,367.75
73322
08/2112007
02938
KORTERRA INC
LOCATE TICKET PROCESSING
1,324.00
73323
0812112007
01337
RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV
ACCUVOTE VOTING SYSTEM
2,454.55
73324
08/2112007
01360
REINHART FOODSERVICE
MDSE FOR RESALE
397.62
73325
0812112007
01504
CITY OF ST PAUL
CRIME LAB SERVICES - JULY
85.00
73326
0812112007
02462
SCOTT D WEMYSS
NAMETAGS
128.54
73327
0812112007
01190
XCEL ENERGY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
12,564.02
08/2112007
01190
XCEL ENERGY
ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY
5,821.83
08/2112007
01190
XCEL ENERGY
ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY
2,725.24
08/2112007
01190
XCEL ENERGY
ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY
2,723.28
0812112007
01190
XCEL ENERGY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
1,046.77
08/2112007
01190
XCEL ENERGY
EQUIP LOAN
494.06
0812112007
01190
XCEL ENERGY
ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY
307.06
0812112007
01190
XCEL ENERGY
FIRE SIRENS
46.38
73328
0812112007
01798
YOCUM OIL CO.
UNLEADED MID -GRADE 89 OCT
17,721.47
73329
08/2112007
03918
ACCOUNTEMPS
TEMP EMPLOYEE WEEK END 7/27
1,834.40
73330
08/2112007
03613
ACTION IMPRINTS
SWEATSHIRTS & T- SHIRTS
1,272.50
73331
08/2112007
00111
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC
PATROL & BOARDING FEE 7130 - 8/12
1,705.33
73332
0812112007
00122
ARDEN SHOREVIEW ANIMAL HOSP
VETERINARIAN SERVICES FOR K9 DUKE
198.20
08/2112007
00122
ARDEN SHOREVIEW ANIMAL HOSP
VETERINARIAN SERVICES FOR K9 DUKE
149.40
0812112007
00122
ARDEN SHOREVIEW ANIMAL HOSP
ADJ COST ON VET SRVS FOR K9 DUKE
48.60
73333
0812112007
01936
CHAD BERGO
REIMB FOR INTERNET SERVICES JULY
52.95
73334
0812112007
03738
BETHEL & ASSOCIATES PA
HR SERVICES 811 - 8115
1,893.00
73335
08/2112007
00230
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.
PIP RAP FOR STORM PROJECT
349.22
73336
08/2112007
00240
G.S.G. CREDIT SERVICES
APPLICANT BACKGROUND CHECKS
50.00
73337
08/2112007
03927
RICHARD N. & LISA M. CARLSON
PROJ 07 -15 PERMANENT EASEMENT
20.25
73338
0812112007
00371
DAKOTA CTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE
EMERGENCY RESPONSE DRIVING -
1,800.00
08/2112007
00371
DAKOTA CTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE
EMERGENCY RESPONSE DRIVING -
600.00
73339
0812112007
03926
DELEGARD TOOL CO
TOOLS & SUPPLIES
2,503.97
73340
0812112007
00358
DGM INC.
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
175.73
0812112007
00358
DGM INC.
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
149.10
08/2112007
00358
DGM INC.
TOW VEHICLE
149.10
08/2112007
00358
DGM INC.
TOW VEHICLE
149.10
08/2112007
00358
DGM INC.
TOW VEHICLE
149.10
0812112007
00358
DGM INC.
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
122.48
73340
08/2112007
00358
DGM INC.
TOW FORTEITURE VEHICLE
122.48
0812112007
00358
DGM INC.
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
111.83
0812112007
00358
DGM INC.
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
90.53
0812112007
00358
DGM INC.
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
90.53
7
08/17/2007
Check Date
73341
73342
73343
73344
73345
73346
73347
73348
73349
73350
73351
73352
73353
73354
73355
73356
73357
73358
73359
73360
73361
73362
73363
73364
73365
73366
73367
73368
73369
73370
73371
73372
73373
73374
73375
73376
73377
73378
73379
73380
73381
73382
73383
73384
73385
73386
73387
08/21/2007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08/21/2007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08/21/2007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08/21/2007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08/21/2007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08/21/2007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08/21/2007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08121/2007
08/2112007
08121/2007
If
ff
!!
ff
00399
02625
02625
If
!!
03924
Ifs:
00604
02945
02945
02945
0
f
1
f
1!
f
0
f
!!
00
01001
03819
ffff
00
ffff
00
Ili!
00
00 001
00
ffff
00
ffff
00
Ili!
01941
f
03872
03530
03920
f
f
01340
03830
f
02001
1
01417
Check Register
City of Maplewood
DGM INC.
DGM INC.
DGM INC.
DGM INC.
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS
DRAGONFLY GARDENS
DRAGONFLY GARDENS
DRAGONFLY GARDENS
EGAN COMPANIES INC
FINAL TOUCH SERVICES INC
FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING INC
FORMS & SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA
FRATTALONE COMPANIES INC.
GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC
HEALTHEAST VEHICLE SERVICES
HEALTHEAST VEHICLE SERVICES
HEALTHEAST VEHICLE SERVICES
HEALTHEAST VEHICLE SERVICES
ERIK HJELLE
MARY JO HOFMEISTER
IMPERIAL IMPRESSIONS
LA METTRY'S COLLISION
DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
DIANA LONGRIE
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
MDRA
METRO SALES INC
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
MIDWEST LOCK & SAFE INC
MINNESOTA POLITICAL PRESS, INC
NAI ARCHITECTS, INC.
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
PATRICK TROPHIES
POSTMASTER
PRO STAFF
DAVID PUNG
QWEST INTERPRISE AMERICA, INC.
QWEST INTERPRISE AMERICA, INC.
REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL XX
REGIONS HOSPITAL
RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
ROAD RESCUE EMERGENCY VEHICLES
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
RYAN PLUMBING & HEATING CO.
SALVATION ARMY
Description
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
TOW VEHICLE
TOW VEHICLE
TOW VEHICLE
PAINT FOR MESSAGE PAINTING
PLANTS FOR CITY HALL CAMPUS
PROJ 05 -16 PLANTS
PLANTS FOR CITY HALL RAINGARDEN
HEATING & A/X UNIT AT STATION 4
WINDOW CLEANING
PROJ 05 -16 KENWOOD PMT #10
TICKET WRITER PRINTER PAPER
PROJ 06 -17 CARMAX/MOGREN PMT #2
PROJ 07 -15 PERMANENT EASEMENT
VEHICLE CONVERSION
VEHICLE CONVERSION
VEHICLE CONVERSION
VEHICLE CONVERSION
REIMS FOR INT 4/1 - 7/31
REIMB FOR MILEAGE 6/26 - 8/1
TICKET ENVELOPES
BODY & PAINT REPAIR SQUAD #904
MONTHLY SURTAX - JULY 2305151810
REIMB FOR INT 3/22 - 7122
MDSE FOR RESALE
MEMBERSHIP DUES
S MAPLEWOOD MORATORIUM STUDY
MONTHLY SAC - JULY
LCN POW ERBOARD, LABOR, TRIP CHG
2007 -2008 DIRECTORY
CONSULTING FOR MCC 2ND FLOOR
REFUND V BIXBY - AMB 6004516
REFUND C SHOBERG - AMB 05001548
REFUND W JOHNSON - AMB 07947
REFUND TOWNS NEW CENTURY -PROJ
REFUND J VANSW EARINGEN - AMB
REFUND EMMAS PLACE - MEMBERSHIP
REFUND K OTTO - TREE REMOVAL
REFUND M VAN - PD BY PATIENT &
REFUND B OLSON - SOFTBALL
REFUND R FERNOW - AMB 05022426
REFUND P HAIDER - AMB 071592
REFUND J KORNGABLE - AMB 05020728
REFUND K ZILLEY - OVERPD DAY CAMP
ADULT SOFTBALL TROPHIES
BUSINESS REPLY MAIL ACCT PERMIT
TEMP CONTROLLER WEEK END 7/29
REPAIR MANUAL FOR FORD DIESEL
REPAIR 911 TELEPHONE SYSTEM 3/8
REPAIR 911 TELEPHONE SYSTEM 3/15
CAR WASH FEE - JULY
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
TRAINING
REPAIR VEHICLE
USED AUDIO RECORDERS
INSTALL TOILET
REIMB FOR OVERPMT MCC
Amount
90.53
53.25
53.25
53.25
852.85
961.22
855.62
762.02
17,180.00
3,003.30
84,746.51
112.37
593,406.43
2,487.00
1,741.15
1,024.26
814.20
684.62
171.80
13.82
409.07
3,117.17
1,481.26
171.80
355.51
495.00
1,059.50
14,924.25
730.21
47.70
210.00
965.50
747.00
619.78
579.92
415.00
273.50
186.38
179.03
140.00
95.31
81.69
21.00
20.00
201.29
2,000.00
2,313.19
158.68
319.50
213.00
163.85
441.44
1,000.00
257.43
150.00
1,125.00
34.30
Check Register
City of Maplewood
08/17/2007
Check
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount
73388
08/21/2007
02632
SERVICE MASTER
CLEANING SERVICES
479.25
73389
08/2112007
01455
MICHAEL SHORTREED
NATIONAL NIGHT OUT SUPPLIES
29.77
73390
08/2112007
01463
SISTER ROSALIND GEFRE
MCC MASSAGES - JULY
1,661.00
73391
08/2112007
00198
ST PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS
WATER UTILITY- KENNARD IRRIGATION
789.48
73392
0812112007
01545
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
MEMBERSHIP FEES
1,600.00
73393
08/2112007
01574
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
PROJ 06 -16 DESOTO /SKILLMAN PMT #2
377,398.76
73394
0812112007
01574
T.R. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
BASE & ASPHALT FOR TRAIL AT
1,184.18
0812112007
01574
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
892.76
73395
0812112007
01588
DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN
REIMS FOR MILEAGE 1107 - 8115
118.34
73396
08/2112007
01026
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEE TO UPDATE MANUALS
5.00
73397
08/2112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -14 SEWER TELEVISING
560.00
08/2112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -15 SEWER TELEVISING
535.00
0812112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -14 SEWER TELEVISING
405.00
08/2112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -15 SEWER TELEVISING
350.00
0812112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -15 SEWER TELEVISING
350.00
0812112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -14 SEWER TELEVISING
350.00
0812112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -15 SEWER TELEVISING
275.00
08/2112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -15 SEWER TELEVISING
275.00
08/2112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -15 SEWER TELEVISING
275.00
08/2112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -14 SEWER TELEVISING
235.00
0812112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -15 SEWER TELEVISING
160.00
08/2112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -15 SEWER TELEVISING
160.00
0812112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -14 SEWER TELEVISING
160.00
0812112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -14 SEWER TELEVISING
160.00
0812112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -14 SEWER TELEVISING
160.00
08/2112007
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
PROJ 07 -14 SEWER TELEVISING
160.00
73398
08/2112007
01683
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
POLICE VEST
749.95
73399
08/2112007
02464
US BANK
FUNDS FOR ATM
6,000.00
73400
0812112007
01750
THE WATSON CO INC
MDSE FOR RESALE
417.37
08/2112007
01750
THE WATSON CO INC
MDSE FOR RESALE
367.55
0812112007
01750
THE WATSON CO INC
MDSE FOR RESALE
356.91
73401
0812112007
01828
KRIS A W EAVER
REIMB FOR MILEAGE 111 - 7131
22.28
1 322.925.54
90 Checks in this report.
A
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted
Date
08/09/07
08/09/07
08/09/07
08/09/07
08/09/07
08/10/07
08/10/07
08/10/07
08/13/07
08/13/07
08/13/07
08/13/07
08/13/07
08/14/07
08/15/07
08/15/07
Settlement
Date
08/10/07
08/10/07
08/10/07
08/10/07
08/10/07
08/13/07
08/13/07
08/13/07
08/14/07
08/14/07
08/14/07
08/14/07
08/14/07
08/15/07
08/16/07
08/16/07
Payee
MN State Treasurer
MN Dept of Natural Resources
Pitney Bowes
ICMA (Vantagepointe)
Orchard Trust
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
WI Dept of Revenue
MN State Treasurer
MidAmerica - ING
MN State Treasurer
WI Dept of Revenue
Labor Unions
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
ARC Administration
Description
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
DNR electronic licenses
Postage
Deferred Compensation
Deferred Compensation
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
State Payroll Tax
State Payroll Tax
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
HRA Flex plan
State Payroll Tax
State Payroll Tax
Union Dues
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
DCRP & Flex plan payments
Amount
18,923.37
723.50
2,985.00
3,883.66
22,936.15
14,877.93
106, 737.24
74,272.96
20, 521.25
1,897.54
21,259.16
1,045.34
2,950.49
15,271.26
14,910.76
1,005.52
324,201.13
10
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
08/10107
CAVE, REBECCA
397.80
08/10107
HJELLE, ERIK
397.80
08/10107
JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN
397.80
08/10107
ROSSBACH, WILLIAM
397.80
08/10107
COPELAND, EUGENE
3,090.00
08/10107
RYDEL, HARRIET
1,565.60
08/10107
FARR, LARRY
2,173.71
08/10107
PALANK, MANDY
308.00
08/10107
RAMEAUX, THERESE
2,737.83
08/10107
MITTET, ROBERT
3,366.86
08/10107
ANDERSON, CAROLS
946.24
08/10107
DEBILZAN, JUDY
1,054.60
08/10107
JACKSON, MARY
2,122.71
08/10107
KELSEY, CONNIE
2,059.20
08/10107
FRY, PATRICIA
1,930.61
08/10107
GUILFOILE, KAREN
3,491.86
08/10107
KROLL, LISA
1,557.58
08/10107
MORSON, JOHN
552.00
08/10107
SCHMIDT, DEBORAH
2,047.65
08/10107
SPANGLER, EDNA
855.69
08/10107
CORTESI, LUANNE
1,042.87
08/10107
JAGOE, CAROL
1,728.46
08/10107
KELLY, LISA
1,141.85
08/10107
LARSON, MICHELLE
952.44
08/10107
MECHELKE, SHERRIE
1,297.71
08/10107
MOY, PAMELA
897.45
08/10107
OSTER, ANDREA
1,807.00
08/10107
WEAVER, KRISTINE
1,893.35
08/10107
BANICK, JOHN
54,000.00
08/10107
CORCORAN, THERESA
1,726.15
08/10107
POWELL, PHILIP
2,589.83
08/10107
RICHIE, CAROLE
1,733.08
08/10107
THOMALLA, DAVID
4,429.00
08/10107
ABEL, CLINT
2,793.74
08/10107
ALDRIDGE, MARK
2,938.62
08/10107
BAKKE, LONN
2,464.57
08/10107
BARTZ, PAUL
3,233.32
08/10107
BELDE, STANLEY
2,514.46
08/10107
BIERDEMAN, BRIAN
2,709.13
08/10107
BOHL, JOHN
3,225.55
III
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
08/10/07
BUSACK, DANIEL
2,400.11
08/10/07
COFFEY, KEVIN
2,499.44
08/10/07
GROTTY, KERRY
2,830.77
08/10/07
DOBLAR, RICHARD
3,964.22
08/10/07
FREDERIKSEN, DAWN
1,645.93
08/10/07
FRITZE, DEREK
1,645.93
08/10/07
GABRIEL, ANTHONY
2,929.57
08/10/07
HAWKINSON JR, TIMOTHY
1,703.43
08/10/07
HEINZ, STEPHEN
2,560.59
08/10/07
HIEBERT, STEVEN
3,106.75
08/10/07
JOHNSON, KEVIN
3,607.25
08/10/07
KALKA, THOMAS
739.88
08/10/07
KARIS, FLINT
3,284.66
08/10/07
KONG, TOMMY
2,400.11
08/10/07
KROLL, BRETT
2,565.65
08/10/07
KVAM, DAVID
3,523.42
08/10/07
LANGNER, TODD
1,960.16
08/10/07
LARSON, DANIEL
2,422.18
08/10/07
LINTNER, HOLLY
673.48
08/10/07
LU, JOHNNIE
2,422.18
08/10/07
MARINO, JASON
2,915.28
08/10/07
MARTIN, JERROLD
2,861.44
08/10/07
MCCARTY, GLEN
2,641.64
08/10/07
METRY, ALESIA
2,797.42
08/10/07
NYE, MICHAEL
2,103.01
08/10/07
OLSON, JULIE
2,445.82
08/10/07
PALMA, STEVEN
2,993.49
08/10/07
RABBETT, KEVIN
3,587.70
08/10/07
RHUDE, MATTHEW
2,527.23
08/10/07
STEFFEN, SCOTT
3,493.25
08/10/07
STEINER, JOSEPH
2,422.87
08/10/07
SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM
2,103.01
08/10/07
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS
2,548.91
08/10/07
IRAN, JOSEPH
2,514.38
08/10/07
WENZEL, JAY
2,742.23
08/10/07
XIONG, KAO
2,422.18
08/10/07
BERGERON, JOSEPH
3,501.02
08/10/07
DUGAS, MICHAEL
2,614.65
08/10/07
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA
2,665.80
08/10/07
FLOR, TIMOTHY
3,400.90
12
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
08/10/07
FRASER, JOHN
2,786.91
08/10/07
LANGNER, SCOTT
2,445.82
08/10/07
THEISEN, PAUL
2,930.86
08/10/07
THIENES, PAUL
2,757.78
08/10/07
BARTA, JEREMY
2,365.58
08/10/07
CRISTOFONO, BRIAN
2,025.01
08/10/07
DAWSON, RICHARD
2,734.42
08/10/07
DUELLMAN, KIRK
1,258.93
08/10/07
EVERSON, PAUL
2,684.60
08/10/07
HALWEG, JODI
2,213.16
08/10/07
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
2,574.53
08/10/07
NOVAK, JEROME
2,519.32
08/10/07
OLSON, JAMES
2,750.54
08/10/07
PARSONS, KURT
2,403.83
08/10/07
PETERSON, ROBERT
2,835.17
08/10/07
PRECHTEL, ROBERT
3,146.15
08/10/07
SVENDSEN, RONALD
3,425.86
08/10/07
GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE
3,146.15
08/10/07
LUKIN, STEVEN
4,016.18
08/10/07
ZWIEG, SUSAN
2,088.01
08/10/07
DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT
293.39
08/10/07
AHL, R. CHARLES
4,675.69
08/10/07
JAMIESON, BRYAN
760.00
08/10/07
KNUTSON, LOIS
1,616.55
08/10/07
KONEWKO, DUWAYNE
3,059.51
08/10/07
NIVEN, AMY
1,294.62
08/10/07
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
2,601.27
08/10/07
AHL, GREGORY
840.00
08/10/07
BRINK, TROY
1,875.75
08/10/07
DEBILZAN, THOMAS
1,975.55
08/10/07
EDGE, DOUGLAS
1,948.55
08/10/07
FOERG, ELIZABETH
969.00
08/10/07
FREBERG, RONALD
886.31
08/10/07
HAMRE, MILES
1,024.00
08/10/07
JONES, DONALD
1,948.55
08/10/07
MEISSNER, BRENT
940.00
08/10/07
MEYER, GERALD
2,057.39
08/10/07
NAGEL, BRYAN
2,486.01
08/10/07
OSWALD, ERICK
2,143.57
08/10/07
RUNNING, ROBERT
1,999.75
13
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
08/10/07
SETNES, SAMUEL
840.00
08/10/07
TEVLIN, TODD
1,921.75
08/10/07
BURLINGAME, NATHAN
1,585.35
08/10/07
DUCHARME, JOHN
2,486.07
08/10/07
ENGSTROM, ANDREW
2,020.01
08/10/07
GAYNOR, VIRGINIA
2,121.35
08/10/07
JACOBSON, SCOTT
1,953.35
08/10/07
JAROSCH, JONATHAN
2,245.39
08/10/07
KREGER, JASON
1,875.23
08/10/07
KUMMER, STEVEN
2,602.00
08/10/07
LABEREE, ERIN
2,882.35
08/10/07
LINDBLOM, RANDAL
2,486.06
08/10/07
MAHLER, MATTHEW
955.32
08/10/07
O'CONNOR, DONOVAN
780.80
08/10/07
SCHREMPP, ANTHONY
876.15
08/10/07
SKOWYRA, NICHOLAS
946.40
08/10/07
THOMPSON, MICHAEL
2,632.98
08/10/07
ZIEMAN, SCOTT
1,056.00
08/10/07
LUND, MARK
720.00
08/10/07
MARUSKA, MARK
2,837.03
08/10/07
NAUGHTON, JOHN
1,911.75
08/10/07
SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
1,950.86
08/10/07
BIESANZ, OAKLEY
197.41
08/10/07
DEAVER, CHARLES
581.90
08/10/07
GERNES, CAROLE
641.25
08/10/07
HAYMAN, JANET
1,297.10
08/10/07
HUTCHINSON, ANN
2,400.31
08/10/07
NELSON, JEAN
80.00
08/10/07
EKSTRAND, THOMAS
3,495.41
08/10/07
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE
1,038.46
08/10/07
SINDT, ANDREA
1,830.95
08/10/07
THOMPSON, DEBRA
690.46
08/10/07
YOUNG, TAMELA
1,697.35
08/10/07
FINWALL, SHANK
2,692.39
08/10/07
ROBERTS, KENNETH
2,958.96
08/10/07
BRASH, JASON
1,589.35
08/10/07
CARVER, NICHOLAS
2,939.21
08/10/07
FISHER, DAVID
3,823.36
08/10/07
RICE, MICHAEL
2,278.95
08/10/07
SWAN, DAVID
2,346.15
1111
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
08/10/07
WELLENS, MOLLY
1,586.27
08/10/07
BURLINGAME, SARAH
803.00
08/10/07
SAMUELSON, MICHAEL
2,090.16
08/10/07
BERGER, STEPHANIE
293.13
08/10/07
WORK, ALICIA
800.00
08/10/07
WORK, BRANDON
782.06
08/10/07
COLEMAN, JOHN
174.25
08/10/07
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
1,120.00
08/10/07
ROBBINS, AUDRA
2,369.00
08/10/07
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
311.13
08/10/07
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS
3,024.90
08/10/07
TAYLOR, JAMES
1,856.47
08/10/07
GERMAIN, DAVID
1,957.79
08/10/07
NORDQUIST, RICHARD
2,233.91
08/10/07
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
2,234.07
08/10/07
ANDERSON, ANTHONY
336.00
08/10/07
ANZALDI, MANDY
1,891.39
08/10/07
CAREY, HEIDI
2,243.79
08/10/07
CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND
324.00
08/10/07
EVANS, CHRISTINE
841.24
08/10/07
HER, CHONG
658.00
08/10/07
HER, PHENG
183.56
08/10/07
HOFMEISTER, MARY
815.63
08/10/07
PELOQUIN, PENNYE
536.76
08/10/07
STAPLES, PAULINE
1,304.70
08/10/07
TOLBERT, FRANCINE
120.00
08/10/07
ZIELINSKI, JUDY
146.30
08/10/07
BIGGS, ANNETTE
48.00
08/10/07
BRENEMAN, NEIL
888.56
08/10/07
BRUSOE, AMY
94.50
08/10/07
BRUSOE, CRISTINA
464.82
08/10/07
CRONIN, CHAD
32.50
08/10/07
DEL ROSARIO, THERESA
39.00
08/10/07
DUNN, RYAN
825.72
08/10/07
ERICKSON- CLARK, CAROL
47.50
08/10/07
EVANS, KRISTIN
43.90
08/10/07
FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA
644.00
08/10/07
FONTAINE, KIM
798.46
08/10/07
GIEL, NICOLE
70.00
08/10/07
GREDVIG, ANDERS
534.86
im
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
{HECK ff CHECK DATE
1002729
1002730
lOU273|
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
O8/lO/O7
EMPLOYEE NAME
HALEY, BROOKE
HA8SENSTADD2NI8B
BDRWATH0ONALD
IRISH, PETER
JOHNSON, JAMES
KOB8N£N,AMy
KOB8N£N,MADY
KDONHOLM,KATBlCYN
L&MEYER,2ACDADy
MATHBVy8
NBLS0N,MADCY
PROESCH,ANDy
RYAN, ERICA
SC|NEF2D,AND0E&
SMITH, ANN
TAYLOR, JASON
TRUE, CAROLINE
T0yy,H2lD£
T0yy,MARCQS
W0LFQRAM,/NADY
ODOy9OU
B£R
H0LMOREN
PARAJNO,OQ&i
DEHAN,JAMES
P/\TT£RGON,/\LD£RT
PRiNG,fJELLY
DElLLY,MUCB&EL
SCN0ENBCKBD,LB|OB
VANO,8UB
VANO,T04
AJCB£LB
PBJEM,8TBVBN
VY0£HDLE
DE03O,ClAD
F0WLD8
FTLaNZEN,hDCHOL&8
LONQBJB,DiANA
C8D1GTGN8OM,8C0TT
JAJDN,DA\QD
AMOUNT
482.80
89.40
2,336.04
65.00
215.45
|56.3U
1,513.73
501.88
|59.|3
375.06
533.|3
4l4]8
36.40
3795
216.70
4&0
46.20
|272U
275.63
615.23
328]3
73.80
138.75
|74.3U
|,884.84
1,058.92
i|l7.57
1,756.55
320.35
59.60
347.80
2,014.63
Z,|9i75
l,8l4`|5
2,355.82
2,686.82
1,780.66
452.00
l,d90.|5
��
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
1002732
08/10/07
MORIN, TROY
174.25
1002733
08/10/07
PALANK, MARY
1,728.46
1002734
08/10/07
SVENDSEN, JOANNE
1,909.79
1002735
08/10/07
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
3,268.81
1002736
08/10/07
WELCHLIN, CABOT
3,016.01
1002737
08/10/07
BUCKLEY, BRENT
1,544.95
1002738
08/10/07
WACHAL, KAREN
866.13
1002739
08/10/07
ANDERSON, MICHAEL
924.00
1002740
08/10/07
EDSON, DAVID
1,988.28
1002741
08/10/07
GORE, MICHAEL
672.00
1002742
08/10/07
HELEY, ROLAND
1,022.99
1002743
08/10/07
HINNENKAMP, GARY
1,959.35
1002744
08/10/07
LINDORFF, DENNIS
1,953.17
1002745
08/10/07
NOVAK, MICHAEL
1,948.55
1002746
08/10/07
OLSON, SCOTT
836.00
1002747
08/10/07
SOUTTER, CHRISTINE
1,160.94
1002748
08/10/07
DAMIANI, ROBERT
180.00
1002749
08/10/07
FARLEY, JAMIE
611.63
1002750
08/10/07
GEBHARD, MADELINE
724.50
1002751
08/10/07
MALLET, AMANDA
294.50
1002752
08/10/07
ROBBINS, EMERALD
319.38
1002753
08/10/07
RYCHLICKI, NICHOLE
105.00
1002754
08/10/07
HAAG, MARK
1,948.55
1002755
08/10/07
NADEAU, EDWARD
3,061.98
1002756
08/10/07
GLASS, JEAN
1,924.86
1002757
08/10/07
HANSEN, LORI
2,302.26
1002758
08/10/07
NAGEL, BROOKE
877.50
1002759
08/10/07
SIMPSON, JOSEPH
215.60
1002760
08/10/07
ANDERSON, JOSHUA
339.98
1002761
08/10/07
ANDERSON, JUSTIN
330.16
1002762
08/10/07
BENJAMIN, AYLA
102.63
1002763
08/10/07
BRENEMAN, SEAN
248.60
1002764
08/10/07
BUCHMAYER, NICOLLET
374.50
1002765
08/10/07
CHASE, STEPHANIE
318.94
1002766
08/10/07
CHASTAN, ADAM
52.00
1002767
08/10/07
DEMPSEY, BETH
98.00
1002768
08/10/07
FENGER, JUSTIN
120.35
1002769
08/10/07
FLETCHER, LOGAN
60.13
1002770
08/10/07
GRUENHAGEN, LINDA
684.55
1002771
08/10/07
HERM, BREANNA
141.38
I
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
1002772
08/10/07
HOLMBERG, LADONNA
221.00
1002773
08/10/07
JOYER, JENNA
115.38
1002774
08/10/07
KOLLER, NINA
248.06
1002775
08/10/07
KOVACS, BREANNA
105.63
1002776
08/10/07
KURZHAL, ALISON
256.75
1002777
08/10/07
LYNCH, KAYLA
78.00
1002778
08/10/07
NWANOKWALE, MORDY
47.25
1002779
08/10/07
PEHOSKI, JOEL
113.00
1002780
08/10/07
RICHTER, DANIEL
68.00
1002781
08/10/07
RICHTER, NANCY
270.75
1002782
08/10/07
ROGNESS, TRYGGVE
400.84
1002783
08/10/07
ROSTRON, ROBERT
387.50
1002784
08/10/07
RYDEEN, ARIEL
210.00
1002785
08/10/07
SAUCERMAN, MICHAEL
158.20
1002786
08/10/07
SCHAEFER, NATALIE
68.25
1002787
08/10/07
SCHMIDT, EMILY
474.75
1002788
08/10/07
SCHMIDT, JOHN
143.00
1002789
08/10/07
SCHRAMM, BRITTANY
398.30
1002790
08/10/07
SCHREINER, MICHELLE
171.29
1002791
08/10/07
SCHUNEMAN, GREGORY
84.50
1002792
08/10/07
SMITLEY, SHARON
427.55
1002793
08/10/07
TRUE, ANDREW
615.98
1002794
08/10/07
VASKO, BEN
123.50
1002795
08/10/07
WARNER, CAROLYN
150.90
1002796
08/10/07
WARNER, REBECCA
359.71
1002797
08/10/07
WHITE, NICOLE
114.60
1002798
08/10/07
WICKNER, KRISTY
154.38
1002799
08/10/07
WILLIAMS, KRISTINE
245.06
1002800
08/10/07
WOLFGRAM, TERESA
199.25
1002801
08/10/07
WOODMAN, ALICE
161.00
1002802
08/10/07
BOSLEY, CAROL
177.00
1002803
08/10/07
GENNOW, PAMELA
705.00
1002804
08/10/07
OIE, REBECCA
79.28
1002805
08/10/07
PATTERSON, FELORENZA
330.75
1002806
08/10/07
SATTLER, CASSANDRA
16.25
1002807
08/10/07
SATTLER, MELINDA
342.25
1002808
08/10/07
STODGHILL, AMANDA
18.13
1002809
08/10/07
TELLS, KAIYA
185.94
1002810
08/10/07
ZAGER, LINNEA
124.69
1002811
08/10/07
BIRKHOLZ, TYLER
206.63
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
1002812
08/10/07
DOUGLASS, TOM
1,451.02
1002813
08/10/07
GADOW, ANNA
271.62
1002814
08/10/07
HER, GHEE
55.60
1002815
08/10/07
HER, PETER
100.78
1002816
08/10/07
O'GRADY, VICTORIA
245.85
1002817
08/10/07
SCHULZE, KEVIN
346.88
1002818
08/10/07
YANG, KAY
296.00
1002819
08/10/07
VUE, LOR PAO
416.80
511,623.81
ius
Agenda Item 12
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: David Fisher, Building Official
SUBJECT: City Ordinance Update — BuildingCodes
DATE: August 21.2007
The Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry recently informed the city building official that
Maplewood should update the three optional administration sections of the city building code
used in Maplewood. (See Attachment 1, Office Memorandum)
The Minnesota State Building Code Rules Chapter 13UO Section O080 Optional Administration
(See Attachment 2) allows municipalities t0 adopt Minnesota Rules, Chapter 13O8 Special Fire
Protection System, 2006 IBC Appendix J Grading and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1335 Flood
Proofing Regulations 8s options. The attachments are provided b] the city council with the
necessary code updates. (See Attachments 3.4&5\
BACKGROUND
In 20O1. the three-model building nOd8 groups, |Ot8rn@tiOD8] CODfRr8nD8 of Building OffiCi8|S
(ICBC)) Building [ffin@| Code Administrators (B(JCA) and Southern Building Code CODgPSSS
International (8BC|C|) merged into the International Code Council (|C[|). The State of
Minnesota adopted this new ICC family of building codes as of March 31, 2003.
As part of the seven county nn8tn] 8n]8, the State requires the City of Mao|8vvoVd to use the
most current codes adopted by the State of Minnesota. In May of 2003. the City adopted GD
ordinance about the building codes in use inMaplewood. This ordinance updated the city code
language and adopted the most current State Building Code for perpetual use in Maplewood. In
addition to adopting the State Building Code, there were three optional provisions that the city
adopted 8spart of the building code with the council's action. As such, the city incorporated
these options 88 part nf the building code.
DISCUSSION
The State 0f Minnesota adopted the 20O0 IBC (international Building COde\.|RC(international
Residential Code) and the |FC (international Fire Code) 8sof July 1O.20O7. Section 12-3S(S9e
Attachment 0) Cfthe city code makes the IBC, |RC and the |FC part 0f the city code by
reference. The three options of the building code had some minor updates and language
changes that the city should adopt aG amendments tV the city code.
Staff is proposing the following updates tothe City OfK8o '3 Building Code options.
*
Existing option 1305 Excavation and Grading: This gives cities regulations for excavation
and grading.
* Ex option 1308.0020 Subpart 3, E Option #1 Speci Fir8 Protection System: This
allows the city to require fire sprinkler systems in all assembly occupancies except for
open stadiums. This also allows the city to require fire sprinkler systems in spaces with 8
smaller floor area than the building code would require. The City Of Maplewood has had
*
Exist option 1335 Flood Proof R8OU|8UOn. This does not allow buildings t0b8built
in ofk)Od plain zone and allows the inspectors to require drain tile and damp proof for
dvv8||in0G. The City 0fMaplewood has this provision in its current ordinance. The sL8L9
made nO changes to this option in20O7.
Adopt the follow code updates to Sect 12'3S(b)(3)of the city code. These changes are
necessary to make the city code consistent with the optional parts of the recently enacted State
Building Code for use in the City of Maplewood. (The old language is crossed out and the new
language iSVnder|in8d):
NO- 11 i9mrZA-
B. Option 1300.UO2O Subpart 3�E- Option #4- #2 Existing & New Buildings Special
Fire Protection System: [This allows the city to require fire sprinkler systems in all
assembly occupancies except for open stadiums. This also 8||OvvS the city to require fire
sprinkler systems in spaces with 8 smaller floor area than the building code would
require.)
Exist option 1335 Flood Proof R8OU|8UOn. This does not allow buildings t0b8built
in 8fklod plain zone and allows the inspectors to require drain tile and damp proof for
dwellings. The City of K88p|8vvoOd has this provision in its current ordinance. The state
made nO changes to this option in20O7.
P:DaveBui|dingOrdinonne Change Aug 2220O7
Attachments
1. Office Memorandum
2. Minnesota State Building Code13OO.0U6OSection Optional Administration
3. Minnesota Rules, Chapter 13US
4. Grading 2U00 IBC Appendix J
5. Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1335
0. Maplewood Code Section 12-3SAdoption
�m
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 8, 2007
TO:
FROM:
PHONE:
Attachment 1
LABOR & INDUSTRY
A trusted resource utilized by
employees and employers ...
Code Officials, Design Professionals, Contractors, and Suppliers
Thomas C. Anderson
State Building Official
(651) 284 -5068
*Aa(
Jerry Rosendahl
State Fire Marshal
SUBJECT: State Building and Fire Code adoption delayed to July 10, 2007
July 10, 2007, has been confirmed as the final adoption date of the Minnesota Building and Fire
codes. While the division's goal has been to have adoption occur on May 31, 2007, an unexpected
delay occurred in the rule process. Commissioner Brener decided to delay the code after receiving a
request from a segment of the industry requesting extra time for training and production of the code
materials. After considerable discussion, it was decided a 40 -day delay would not have an adverse
impact on the code, yet would provide valuable time for stakeholders to obtain code materials and
additional training for successful implementation of the code.
On Monday, July 2, 2007, the notice of adoption will be published in the State Register with an
effective date of July 10, 2007, for the following codes:
• Chapter 1300 Minnesota Building Code Administration
• Chapter 1303 Special Provisions -- Minnesota provisions of the State Building Code
• Chapter 1305 Adoption of the International Building Code
• Chapter 1306 Special Fire Protection Systems
• Chapter 1309 Adoption of the International Residential Code
• Chapter 1341 Minnesota Accessibility Code
• Chapter 7511 State Fire Code (proposed new chapter to replace chapter 7510)
Chapter 1307 Elevators and related devices was adopted and became effective Jan. 29, 2007.
-more-
The following codes are still in various stages of adoption and are expected to follow this fall.
• Chapter 1311 Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings
• Chapter 1322 Residential Energy Code
• Chapter 1323 Commercial Energy Code
• Chapter 1346 Mechanical and Fuel Gas Codes
• Chapter 4715 Minnesota Plumbing Code
• Chapter 5230 High - pressure piping, pipefitters, power piping system
THE 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE
Attachment 2
1309 and other applicable rules. Other F. 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems;
buildings and structures and appurtenances
connected or attached to them shall comply G. 1307, Elevators and Related Devices;
with chapter 1305 and other applicable rules.
Exception: The following structures that
meet the scope of chapter 1305 shall be
designed to comply with Minnesota
Rules, chapter 1311:
(1) existing buildings undergoing repair,
alteration, or change of occupancy; and
(2) historic buildings.
H. 1309, Adoption of the International
Residential Code;
1. 1311, Minnesota Conservation Code
for Existing Buildings;
J. 1315, Adoption of the National
Electrical Code;
If different provisions of the code specify
different materials, methods of construction,
or other requirements, the most restrictive
provision governs. If there is a conflict
between a general requirement and a specific
requirement, the specific requirement applies.
If reference is made in the code to an
appendix, the provisions in the appendix do
not apply unless specifically adopted by the
code. Optional appendix chapters of the code
identified in part 1300.0060 do not apply
unless a municipality has specifically adopted
them.
1300.0050 CHAPTERS OF MINNESOTA
STATE BUILDING CODE.
The Minnesota State Building Code
adopted under Minnesota Statutes, section
16B.61, subdivision 1, includes the following
chapters:
A. 1300, Minnesota Building Code
Administration;
B. 1301, Building Official Certification;
C. 1302, State Building Code
Construction Approvals;
D. 1303, Special Provisions;
E. 1305, Adoption of the International
Building Code;
K. 1325, Solar Energy Systems;
L. 1335, Floodproofing Regulations;
M. 1341, Minnesota Accessibility Code;
N. 1346, Minnesota Mechanical Code;
O. 1350, Manufactured Homes;
P. 1360, Prefabricated Structures;
Q. 1361, Industrialized/ Modular
Buildings;
R. 1370, Storm Shelters (Manufactured
Home Parks);
S. 4715, Minnesota Plumbing Code; and
T. 7670, 7672, 7674, 7676, and 7678,
Minnesota Energy Code.
1300.0060 OPTIONAL ADMINISTRATION.
The following chapters of the code are not
mandatory but may be adopted without
change by a municipality which has adopted
the code:
A. chapter 1306, Special Fire Protection
Systems;
B. grading, IBC appendix chapter J; and
128
THE 2007 MENNEsoTA STATE BUILDING CODE
C. chapter 1335, Floodproofing
Regulations, parts 1335.0600 to 1335.1200.
1300.0070 DEFINITIONS.
Subp. 4. Agricultural building.
"Agricultural building" means a building that
meets the requirements of Minnesota Statutes,
section 16B.60, subdivision 5.
Subpart 1. Scope; incorporation by
reference. The definitions in this part apply
to parts 1300.0010 to 1300.0250. For terms
that are not defined through the methods
authorized by this chapter, the Merriam -
Webster Collegiate Dictionary, available at
www.m- w.com, shall be considered as
providing ordinarily accepted meanings. The
dictionary is incorporated by reference, is
subject to frequent change, and is available
through the Minitex interlibrary loan system.
Subp. 2. Administrative authority.
"Administrative authority" means a
municipality's governing body or its assigned
administrative authority.
Subp. 3. Adult day care center. "Adult
day care center" means a facility that provides
adult day care to functionally impaired adults
on a regular basis for periods of less than 24
hours a day in a setting other than a
participant's home or the residence of the
facility operator.
A. "Class E" means any building or
portion of a building used for adult day care
purposes, by more than five occupants, for
those participants who are capable of taking
appropriate action for self- preservation under
emergency conditions as determined
according to part 9555.9730, and must meet
Group E occupancy requirements.
B. "Class I" means any building or
portion of a building used for adult day care
purposes, by more than five occupants, for
those participants who are not capable of
taking appropriate action for self - preservation
under emergency conditions as determined
according to part 95559730, and must meet
Group 1, Division 4 occupancy requirements.
Subp. 5. Building official. "Building
official" means the municipal building code
official certified under Minnesota Statutes,
section 16B.65, subdivisions 2 and 3.
Subp. 6. Building service equipment.
"Building service equipment" refers to the
plumbing, mechanical, electrical, and elevator
equipment, including piping, wiring, fixtures,
and other accessories, that provides sanitation,
lighting, heating, ventilation, cooling,
refrigeration, firefighting, and transportation
facilities essential to the occupancy of the
building or structure for its designated use and
occupancy.
Subp. 7. City. "City" means a home rule
charter or statutory city.
Subp. S. Code. "Code" means the
Minnesota State Building Code adopted under
Minnesota Statutes, section 16B.61,
subdivision 1, and includes the chapters
identified in part 1300.0020.
Subp. 9. Commissioner.
"Commissioner" means the commissioner of
administration.
Subp. 10. Designate. "Designate" means
the formal designation by a municipality's
administrative authority of a certified building
official accepting responsibility for code
administration.
Subp. 10a. Family adult day services.
"Family adult day services" means a program
providing services for up to eight functionally
impaired adults for less than 24 hours per day
in the license holder's primary residence
according to Minnesota Statutes, section
245A.143. This includes programs located in
residences licensed by the Department of
129
THE 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE
Attachment 3
MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 1306
SPECIAL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
1306.0010 GENERAL.
This chapter authorizes optional
provisions for the installation of on-premises
fire suppression systems that may be adopted
by a municipality in addition to the State
Building Code. If the municipality adopts
them, the sprinkler system requirements of
this chapter become part of the State Building
Code and are applicable throughout the
municipality. This chapter, if adopted, must
be adopted without amendment.
must be installed and maintained in
operational condition within the structure.
The requirements of this subpart apply to
structures that fall within the occupancy
classifications established in part 1306.0030,
items A to D.
Exception: The floor area of minor
additions that do not increase the occupant
load does not have to be figured into the
square footage for occupancy
classifications established in part
1306.0030, items A to D.
1306.0020 MUNICIPAL OPTION.
Subpart 1.. Requirement. The sprinkler
system requirements of this chapter, if
adopted, must be adopted with the selection
of either subpart 2 or 3, without amendment.
Subp. 2. Existing and new buildings.
Automatic sprinkler systems for new
buildings, buildings increased in total floor
area (including the existing building), or
buildings in which the occupancy
classification has changed, must be installed
and maintained in operational condition
within the structure. The requirements of this
subpart apply to structures that fall within the
occupancy classifications established in part
1306.0030, items A to D.
Exception: The floor area of minor
additions that do not increase the occupant
load does not have to be figured into the
square footage for occupancy
classifications established in part
1306.0030, items A to D.
Subp. 3. New buildings. Automatic
sprinkler systems for new buildings, additions
to existing buildings, or buildings in which
the occupancy classification has changed
1306.0030 REQUIREMENTS.
For purposes of this chapter, area
separation, fire barriers, or fire walls do not
establish separate buildings. Gross square
footage (gsf) means the floor area as defined
in the International Building Code. The floor
area requirements established in items A to D
are based on the gross square footage of the
entire building and establish thresholds for
these requirements. The following occupancy
groups must comply with sprinkler
requirements of this chapter, unless specified
otherwise:
A. Group A 1, A 2, A 3, and A4
occupancies;
Exception: air inflated structures, and
open picnic shelters.
B. Group B, F, M, and S occupancies
with 2,000 or more gross square feet of floor
area or with three or more stories in height;
Exception: S 2 open parking garages,
aircraft hangars, salt storage sheds, and
group "M" detached canopies.
212
THE 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE
C. Group E occupancies with 2,000 or
more gross square feet of floor area or with
two or more stories in height;
D. Group E day care occupancies with an
occupant load of 30 or more;
1306.0070 REPORTING.
A municipality must submit a copy of the
ordinance adopting this chapter to the
Department of Labor and Industry,
Construction Codes and Licensing Division.
The ordinance does not go into effect until:
1306.0040 STANDARD.
Automatic sprinkler systems must comply
with the applicable standard referenced in the
State Building Code. If a public water supply
is not available, the building official and fire
chief shall approve the use of an alternate on-
site source of water if the alternate source
provides protection that is comparable to that
provided by a public water supply. If an
adequate alternate water,supply sufficient for
hose stream requirements is provided or
available, the building official and fire chief
may permit the water supply requirements for
the hose stream demands to be modified.
A. a signed electronic, Taxed, or paper
copy of the ordinance has been received by
the division; and
B. the ordinance has been approved by
the division.
An ordinance is deemed automatically
approved by the division if the municipality
has not been informed that the ordinance has
not been approved within ten working days of
the division's receipt of the ordinance.
1306.0100 [Repealed, 27 SR 14791
1306.0050 SUBSTITUTE
CONSTRUCTION.
The installation of an automatic sprinkler
system, as required by this chapter, would still
allow the substitution of one -hour fire -
resistive construction as permitted by the
International Building Code, Table 601,
footnote d.
1306.0060 EXEMPTION.
The building official, with the
concurrence of the fire official, may waive the
requirements of this chapter if the application
of water has been demonstrated to constitute a
serious life, fire, or environmental hazard, or
if the building does not have an adequate
water supply and the building is surrounded
by public ways or yards more than 60 feet
wide on all sides.
Minn, Rules repealed, etc. in chapter 1306
1306.0100 [Repealed, 27 SR 1479]
213
Attachment 4
APPENDIX J
GRADING
The provisions contained in this appendix are not mandatory unless specifically referenced in the adopting ordinance.
SECTION J101
GENERAL
J101.1 Scope. The provisions of this chapter apply to grading,
excavation and earthwork construction, including fills and
embankments. Where conflicts occur between the technical
requirements of this chapter and the soils report, the soils report
shall govern.
J101.2 Flood hazard areas. The provisions of this chapter
shall not apply to grading, excavation and earthwork construc-
tion, including fills and embankments, in floodways within
flood hazard areas established in Section 1612.3 or in flood
hazard areas where design flood elevations are specified but
floodways have not been designated, unless it has been demon-
strated through hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed
in accordance with standard engineering practice that the pro-
posed work will not result in any increase in the level of the
base flood.
SECTION J102
DEFINITIONS
J102.1 Definitions. For the purposes of this appendix chapter,
the terms, phrases and words listed in this section and their
derivatives shall have the indicated meanings.
BENCH. A relatively level step excavated into earth material
on which fill is to be placed.
COMPACTION. The densification of a fill by mechanical
means.
CUT. See Excavation.
DOWN DRAIN. A device for collecting water from a swale or
ditch located on or above a slope, and safely delivering it to an
approved drainage facility
EROSION. The wearing away of the ground surface as a result
of the movement of wind, water or ice.
EXCAVATION. The removal of earth material by artificial
means, also referred to as a cut.
FILL. Deposition of earth materials by artificial means.
GRADE. The vertical location of the ground surface.
GRADE, EXISTING. The grade prior to grading.
GRADE, FINISHED. The grade of the site at the conclusion
of all grading efforts.
GRADING. An excavation or fill or combination thereof.
KEY. A compacted fill placed in a trench excavated in earth
material beneath the toe of a slope.
SLOPE. An inclined surface, the inclination of which is
expressed as a ratio of horizontal distance to vertical distance.
TERRACE. A relatively level step constructed in the face of a
graded slope for drainage and maintenance purposes.
SECTION J103
PERMITS REQUIRED
J103.1 Permits required. Except as exempted in Section
J103.2, no grading shall be performed without first having
obtained a permit therefor from the building official. A grading
permit does not include the construction of retaining walls or
other structures.
J103.2 Exemptions. A grading permit shall not be required for
the following:
1. Grading in an isolated, self-contained area, provided
there is no danger to the public, and that such grading
will not adversely affect adjoining properties.
2. Excavation for construction of a structure permitted
under this code.
3. Cemetery graves.
4. Refuse disposal sites controlled by other regulations.
5. Excavations for wells, or trenches for utilities.
6. Mining, quarrying, excavating, processing or stockpil-
ing rock, sand, gravel, aggregate or clay controlled by
other regulations, provided such operations do not affect
the lateral support of, or significantly increase stresses
in, soil on adjoining properties.
7. Exploratory excavations performed under the direction
of a registered design professional.
Exemption from the permit requirements of this appendix
shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be
done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or
any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction.
SECTION J104
PERMIT APPLICATION AND SUBMITTALS
J104.1 Submittal requirements. In addition to the provisions
of Section 105.3, the applicant shall state the estimated quanti-
ties of excavation and fill.
2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE' 605
APPENDIX J
J104.2 Site plan requirements. In addition to the provisions
of Section 106, a grading plan shall show the existing grade and
finished grade in contour intervals of sufficient clarity to indi-
cate the nature and extent of the work and show in detail that it
complies with the requirements of this code. The plans shall
show the existing grade on adjoining properties in sufficient
detail to identify how grade changes will conform to the
requirements of this code.
SECTION J105
INSPECTIONS
J105.1 General. Inspections shall be governed by Section 109
of this code.
J105.2 Special inspections. The special inspection require-
ments of Section 1704.7 shall apply to work performed under a
grading permit where required by the building official.
J104.3 ,Soils report. A soils report prepared by registered
design professionals shall be provided which shall identify the
nature and distribution of existing soils; conclusions and rec-
ommendations for grading procedures; soil design criteria for
any structures or embankments required to accomplish the pro-
posed grading; and, where necessary, slope stability studies,
andrecommendations and conclusions regarding site geology.
Exception: A soils report is not required where the building
official determines that the nature of the work applied for is
such that a report is not necessary.
J104.4 Liquefaction study. For sites with mapped maximum
considered earthquake spectral response accelerations at short
periods (S greater than 0.5g as determined by Section 1613, a
study of the liquefaction potential of the site shall be provided,
and the recommendations incorporated in the plans.
Exception: A liquefaction study is not required where the
building official determines from established local data that
the liquefaction potential is low.
SECTION J106
EXCAVATIONS
J106,1 Maximum slope. The slope of cut surfaces shall be no
steeper than is safe for the intended use, and shall be no steeper
than 2 horizontal to 1 vertical (50 percent) unless the applicant
furnishes a soils report justifying a steeper slope.
Exceptions:
A cut surface may be at a slope of 1,5 horizontal to 1
vertical (67 percent) provided that all the following
are met:
1.1. It is not intended to support structures or sur-
charges.
1.2. It is adequately protected against erosion.
1.3. It is no more than 8 feet (2438 mm) in height.
1,4. It is approved by the building official.
1 A cut surface in bedrock shall be permitted to be at a
slope of I horizontal to I vertical (100 percent).
FILL SLOPE
-*- -5 FT. (1524 mm) OR GREATER
NATURAL SLOPE
4 .. 01
r �"
*„ r
e w+ 2 FT. [610 mm} REMOVE! UN
,.
6KEYMINIMUM
55
For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 min.
FIGURE J107,3
BENCHING DETAILS
606 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE®
APPENDIX J
SECTION J107
FILLS
J107.1 General. Unless otherwise recommended in the soils
report, fills shall conform to provisions of this section.
J107.2 Surface preparation. The ground surface shall be pre-
pared to receive fill by removing vegetation, topsoil and other
unsuitable materials, and scarifying the ground to provide a
bond with the fill material.
J107.3 Benching. Where existing grade is at a slope steeper than
5 horizontal to 1 vertical (20 percent) and the depth of the fill
exceeds 5 feet (1524 mm) benching shall be provided in accor-
dance with Figure J107.3. A key shall be provided which is at
least 10 feet (3048 mm) in width and 2 feet (610 mm) in depth.
J107.4 Fill material. Fill material shall not include organic,
frozen or other deleterious materials. No rock or similar irre-
ducible material greater than 12 inches (305 mm) in any dimen-
sion shall be included in fills.
J107.5 Compaction. All fill material shall be compacted to 90
percent of maximum density as determined by ASTM D 1557,
Modified Proctor, in lifts not exceeding 12 inches (305 mm) in
depth.
J107.6 Maximum slope. The slope of fill surfaces shall be no
steeper than is safe for the intended use. Fill slopes steeper than
2 horizontal to 1 vertical (50 percent) shall be justified by soils
reports or engineering data.
SECTION J108
SETBACKS
J108.1 General. Cut and fill slopes shall be set back from the
property lines in accordance with this section. Setback dimen-
sions shall be measured perpendicular to the property line and
shall be as shown in Figure J108.1, unless substantiating data is
submitted justifying reduced setbacks.
J108.2 Top of slope. The setback at the top of a cut slope shall
not be less than that shown in Figure J108.1, or than is required
to accommodate any required interceptor drains, whichever is
greater.
J108.3 Slope protection. Where required to protect adjacent
properties at the toe of a slope from adverse effects of the grad-
ing, additional protection, approved by the building official,
shall be included. Such protection may include but shall not be
limited to:
1. Setbacks greater than those required by Figure J108.1.
2. Provisions for retaining walls or similar construction.
3. Erosion protection of the fill slopes.
4. Provision for the control of surface waters.
SECTION J109
DRAINAGE AND TERRACING
J109.1 General. Unless otherwise recommended by a regis-
tered design professional, drainage facilities and terracing shall
he provided in accordance with the requirements of this sec-
tion.
Exception: Drainage facilities and terracing need not be
provided where the ground slope is not steeper than 3 hori-
zontal to 1 vertical (33 percent).
J109.2 Terraces. Terraces at least 6 feet (1829 mm) in width
shall be established at not more than 30 -foot (9144 mm) verti-
cal intervals on all cut or fill slopes to control surface drainage
Property
Top of
but (610 minimum Slope
and need d not exceed
10 IL (3048 mm) maximum
Property
Line
Out or FIII
Slope Natural or
H!5 but 2 ft. (810 mm) minimum I Top of Finish Grade
and need not exceed Slope
20 8. (6096 mm) maximum
Interceptor gain
E h (if required)
I
Natural or
Finish Gmda
For ST: 1 foot = 344.8 mm.
FIGURE J108.1
DRAINAGE DIMENSIONS
2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 607
APPENDIX J
and debris. Suitable access shall be provided to allow for clean-
ing and maintenance.
Where more than two terraces are required, one terrace,
located at approximately mid- height, shall be at least 12 feet
(3658 mm) in width.
Swales or ditches shall be provided on terraces. They shall
have a minimum gradient of 20 horizontal to 1 vertical (5 per-
cent) and shall be paved with concrete not less than 3 inches (76
mm) in thickness, or with other materials suitable to the appli-
cation. They shall have a minim depth of 12 inches (305
mm) and a minimum width of 5 feet (1524 mm).
A single run of swale or ditch shall not collect runoff from a
tributary area exceeding 13,500 square feet (1256 in ( pro-
jected) without discharging into a down drain.
J109.3 Interceptor drains. Interceptor drains shall be
installed along the top of cut slopes receiving drainage from a
tributary width greater than 40 feet (12 192 mm), measured
horizontally. They shall have a minim depth of 1 foot (305
mm) and a minimum width of 3 feet (915 mm). The slope shall
be approved by the building official, but shall not be less than
50 horizontal to 1 vertical (2 percent). The drain shall be paved
with concrete not less than 3 inches (76 mm) in thickness, or by
other materials suitable to the application. Discharge from the
drain shall be accomplished in a manner to prevent erosion and
shall be approved by the building official.
J109.4 Drainage across property lines. Drainage across
property lines shall not exceed that which existed prior to grad-
ing. Excess or concentrated drainage shall be contained on site
or directed to an approved drainage facility. Erosion of the
ground in the area of discharge shall be prevented by installa-
tion of nonerosive down drains or other devices.
SECTION J110
EROSION CONTROL
J110.1 General. The faces of cut and fill slopes shall be pre-
pared and maintained to control erosion. This control shall be
permitted to consist of effective planting.
Exception: Erosion control measures need not be provided
on cut slopes not subject to erosion due to the erosion- resis-
tant character of the materials.
Erosion control for the slopes shall be installed as soon as
practicable and prior to calling for final inspection.
J110.2 Other devices. Where necessary, check dams, crib-
bing, riprap or other devices or methods shall be employed to
control erosion and provide safety.
SECTION J111
REFERENCED STANDARDS
ASTM D 1557 -e01 Test Method for Laboratory J107.6
Compaction Characteristics
of Soil Using Modified Effort
[56,000 ft-lb/ft'
(2,700kN- m1nP)1.
608 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE®
THE 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE
Attachment 5
MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 1335
FLOOD PROOFING REGULATIONS
1335.0200 ADOPTION OF "FLOOD
PROOFING REGULATIONS."
Sections 100 to 1406 of the 1972 edition of
"Flood Proofing Regulations" (FPR) as
promulgated by the Office of the Chief
Engineers, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C. is
incorporated by reference and hereby made a
part of the State Building Code subject to the
amendments in parts 1335.0200 to 1335.3000.
FPR sections 201.2 to 208.2 are placed in the
appendix of this code.
above mean sea level to which floodproofing
protection shall be provided. Hereinafter
reference to the term "regulatory flood
datum" in these regulations shall be
synonymous with the term "flood protection
elevation" as used in parts 6120.5000 to
6120.6200.
1335.0500 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 201.1.
FPR section 201.1 is amended to read as
follows:
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.0300 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 200.2.
FPR section 200.2 is amended to read as
follows:
Official Floodplain Zoning Map: The official
plain zoning map showing the extent and
boundaries of the primary and secondary
flood hazard areas is hereby declared and
established as part of these regulations.
Hereinafter reference to term "primary flood
hazard areas" in these regulations shall be
synonymous with the term "floodplain areas"
as used in parts 6120.5000 to 6120.6200.
1335.0400 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 200.3.
FPR section 200.3 is amended to read as
follows:
Application. These regulations shall apply to
the construction, alteration, and repair of any
building or parts of a building or structure in
the flood hazard area(s) of the municipalities.
Additions, alterations, repairs, and changes of
use occupancy shall comply with all
provisions for new buildings and structures as
otherwise required in the building code,
except as specifically provided in these
regulations.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.0600 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 201.2.
FPR section 201.2 is amended to read as
follows:
This section shall apply unless equivalent
provisions are incorporated in the city or
county flood plain zoning ordinance.
Regulatory Flood Datum: For the purpose of
these regulations, the regulatory flood datum,
or as hereinafter referred to, the "RFD," is
hereby declared and established for use as the
reference datum for determining the elevation
Nonconforming Use: A structure or the use
of a structure or premises which was lawful
before the passage or amendment of the
ordinance but which is not in conformity with
the provisions of these regulations may be
272
THE 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BumDING CODE
continued subject to the following conditions:
1. No such use shall be expanded, changed,
enlarged, or altered in away which increases
its nonconformity.
2. No structural alteration, addition, or repair
to any conforming structure over the life of
the structure shall exceed 50 percent of its
market value at the time of its becoming a
nonconforming use, unless the structure is
permanently changed to a conforming use.
3. If such use is discontinued for 12
consecutive months, any future use of the
building premises shall conform to these
regulations. The assessor shall , notify the
zoning administrator in writing of instances of
nonconforming uses which have been
discontinued for a period of 12 months.
FPR section 203.3 is amended to read as
follows:
Records: Copies of such tests, reports,
certifications, or the results of such tests shall
be kept on file in the office of the building
official for a period of not less than two years
after the approval and acceptance of the
completed structure for beneficial occupancy.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.0800 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 204.6.
FPR section 204.6 is amended to read as
follows:
Board of Appeals: See part 1305.0500,
Uniform Building Code section 204.
4. If any nonconforming use or structure is
destroyed by any means, including floods, to
an extent of 50 percent or more of its market
value, it shall not be reconstructed except in
conformance with the provisions of these
regulations; provided, the Board of Appeals
may permit reconstruction if the use or
structure is located outside the floodway and
is adequately and' safely floodproofed,
elevated, or otherwise protected in
conformance with these regulations.
5. Uses or adjuncts thereof which are or
become nuisances shall not be entitled to
continue as nonconforming uses.
6. An alteration, addition, or repair to a
nonconforming structure that exceeds 50
percent of its market value must be protected
as required by these regulations.
STAT AUTH: MS s 1613.61; 104.05
HIST: 15 SR 74
1335.0700 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 203.3.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.0900 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 204.7.
FPR section 204.7 is amended to read as
follows:
Validity: It shall be unlawful for any person,
firm, or corporation or agency (state or local)
to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair,
move, improve, remove, convert, or demolish
any building or structure in the flood hazard
area(s), or cause the same to be done, contrary
to or in violation of any of the provisions of
these regulations and /or the building code.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.1000 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 205.1.
FPR section 205.1 is amended to read as
follows:
Statement of Intention to Improve: The
273
THE 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE
owner or any registered architect or licensed
professional engineer authorized to represent
the owner shall, before preparing final plans
for any improvement in the flood hazard
area(s), file with the building official a
statement of intention to improve, including a
brief description of the type of improvement
being considered and giving its precise
location, on a form provided by the building
official. The building official shall note on
two copies the elevation of the RFD at the
location of the proposed improvement. One
copy of the statement of intention to improve
must be retained by the building official until
a permit copy for improvement on the site is
approved or one year has elapsed; a second
copy must be returned to the owner for use in
final siting and design of the improvement.
Assignments of the RFD elevations at all
locations must be consistent with the
determination of the regulatory flood
protection elevation as defined in the
community's flood plain zoning controls, if
any. This information must be open to public
examination at all reasonable times.
STAT AUTH: MS s 16B.61; 104.05
HIST: 15 SR 74
official without a permit, provided that such
repairs shall not violate any provisions of
these regulations or of the building code.
STAT AUTH: MS s 1613.61; 104.05
HIST: 15 SR 74
1335.1200 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 205.3.
Subpart 1. No. 2. FPR section 205.3, No. 2 is
amended to read as follows:
Two sets of complete plans and
specifications, in addition to plans and
specifications required by the building code,
except that plans and specifications for any
and all proposed improvement in the primary
flood hazard area(s) shall be prepared by an
engineer or architect licensed by the state to
practice as such. All drawings and
specifications shall bear the true name of the
author thereof, followed by such title as the
author may be lawfully authorized to use. All
plans and sections shall be noted with the
proposed floodproofing class of each space
below the RFD including detail drawings of
walls and wall openings.
1335.1100 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 205.2.
FPR section 205.2 is amended to read as
follows:
Permits Required: No person, firm, or
corporation shall erect, construct, alter, repair,
move, remove, convert, or demolish any
building or structure or any part thereof, or
make any other improvement within the
structure or any part thereof, or make any
other improvement within the flood hazard
area(s), or cause same to be done, without
first obtaining a separate flood plain building
permit for any such improvement from the
building official. Ordinary minor repairs may
be made with the approval of the building
Exception: Plans for Group M Division 1
Occupancies need not be prepared by a
licensed architect or engineer.
Subp. 2. No. 3. FPR section 205.3. No. 3 is
amended to read as follows:
Two copies of the owner's contingency plan,
which shall describe in detail all procedures
for temporary placement and removal or
contingent protection proposed items in
spaces affected by these regulations
including:
A. plans and schedules for items to be
removed and locations of places above the
RIND to which they will be removed if
these contents violate restrictions
274
TAE 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BU"ING CODE
associated with the floodproofing class of
the space in which they are placed
temporarily, including specific
organizational responsibilities; and
B. procedures, materials, and equipment
for protecting items required to have
protection by their floodproofing class, but
for which this protection is proposed to be
provided contingently, including specific
organizational responsibilities for
accomplishing this protection.
follows:
Use of Space Below the Regulatory Flood
Datum: No floor level or portion of the
building or structure that is below the RFD
regardless of structure or space classification
shall be used as habitable space, or for storage
of any property, materials, or equipment that
might constitute a safety hazard when
contacted by flood waters.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
Waivers of restrictions implicitly requested
by submission of the owner's contingency
plan may be granted by the building official
as provided by 1101.2.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
HIST: 17 SR 1279
1335.1300 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 209.1.
FPR section 209.1 is amended to read as
follows:
New Building and Structures: Every building
or structure hereafter erected, that is located
in the primary flood hazard area(s) where the
ground surface is two feet or more below the
RFD, or where flood water velocities may
exceed five feet per second, shall be provided
with an enclosed refuge space above the RFD,
of sufficient area to provide for the occupancy
load with a minimum of 12 square feet per
person. It shall be provided with one or more
exits through the exterior walls above the
RFD to an exterior platform and stairway not -
less than three feet wide.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.1400 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 209.3.
FPR section 209.3 is amended to read as
1335.1500 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 210.7.
FPR section 210.7 is amended to read as
follows:
Placard Types: Placards shall be white rigid
plastic or other non - water - susceptible
materials eight inches long and 12 inches
wide, and shall have printed thereon in black
letters the information shown in figure 2.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.1600 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 300.0.
FPR section 300.0 is amended by adding a
subsection to read as follows:
FPR Section 300.2. Interpretation: For the
purpose of these regulations, where definition
of terms as set forth in this chapter conflict in
meaning with those as set forth in part
b 120.5000, the latter shall take precedence.
STAT AUTH: MS s 1 04.05
1335.1700 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 301.2.9.
FPR section 301.2.9 is amended to read as
follows:
275
THE 2007 MugNEsoTA STATE BmDING CODE
Habitable space (room) is space in a structure
for living, sleeping, eating, . or cooking.
Bathrooms, toilet compartments, closets,
halls, storage rooms, laundry or utility space,
and similar areas, are not considered habitable
space.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.1800 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 301.4.1.
FPR section 301.4.1 is amended to read as
follows:
Building Code: The State Building Code
setting forth standards for the construction,
addition, and modification and repair of
buildings and other structures for the purpose
of protecting health, safety, and general
welfare of the public.
FLOOD PROOFING
CLASSIFICATION
OF SPACES
MINIMUM
RE
FlaodProofi�rg 4pate{
S6Erdar�
G'b�ireaf
Wads &:
Clams Proofing
Igads
Openings
FWFO
Cd gs
Cariacb
W1
Completely Type A
Class 1
Type 1
Class i
Class 1
Class 1
W2
Essentially Type s
class 1
Type 2
Class 2
Class 2
Class 2
01
W3
Flo Mwih TypeA
Class
Type3
Class
Class
Class
Potable Water
W4
Roadedvalh Typat;
Class
Type
Wss4
Class
CWs4
FloodWater
W5
Non
—
Type 5
Class 5
Class 5
ClassS
FloodP�aofsrg
lowmal Ftaod'urg & t)wIgg • see CWPter 8
Eleditrl -see chapter 12
M1ledrarura[ • See Chaffer 13
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.1900 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 402.1.
FPR section 402.1 (table 2) is amended to
read as follows:
General: Table 2 indicates the various
degrees.of protection required to permit use of
spaces for each floodproof ng; the chart in
itself shall not be construed as being
exhaustive with respect to all requirements
imposed by these regulations. In any disputes
arising over the interpretation of this chart,
the written provisions of these regulations
shall be considered as definitive.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
13351950 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 612.1.
FPR section 612.1 is amended to read as
follows:
Methods. A building must be considered
completely floodproofed if the lowest
elevation of all space within the building
perimeter is above the RFD as achieved by:
(1) building on natural terrain beyond the
RFD limit line on natural undisturbed ground;
(2) building on fill; or
(3) building on stilts.
These methods may be used alone or in
combination to achieve the required degree of
floodproofing. Data and design procedures
must be based on organized and acceptable
disciplines involved and the following
additional requirements.
0111.
THE 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE
STAT AUTH: MS s 16B.61
HIST: 15 SR 74
1335.2000 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 612.2.1.
FPR section 612.2.1 is amended to read as
follows:
Natural Terrain: In addition to the
requirements of the building code, the
building shall be located not less than 15 feet
back from the line of incidence of the RFD on
the ground, foundation design shall take into
consideration the effects of soil saturation on
the performance of the foundations, the
effects of flood waters on slope stability shall
be investigated, normal access to the building
shall be by direct connections with areas
above the RFD and all utility service lines
shall be designated and constructed as
required to protect the building and/or its
components from damage or failure during a
flooding event to the RFD.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.2100 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 612.2.2.
FPR section 612.2.2 is amended to read as
follows:
Building on Fill: The building and all parts
thereof may be constructed above the RFD on
an earth fill. Prior to placement of any fill or
embankment materials, the area upon which
fill is to be placed, including a five -foot strip
measured horizontally beyond and contiguous
to the toe line of the fill, shall be cleared of
standing trees and snags, stumps, brush, down
timber, logs and other growth, and all objects
including structures on or above the ground
surface or partially burned. The area shall be
stripped of topsoil and all other material
which is considered unsuitable by the
building official as foundation material. All
combustible and noncombustible materials
and debris from the clearing, grubbing, and
stripping operations shall be removed from
the proposed fill area and disposed of at
locations above the RFD and/or in the manner
approved by the building official. Fill
material shall be of a selected type, preferably
granular and free- draining placed in
compacted layers. Fill selection and
placement shall recognize the effects of
saturation from flood waters on slope
stability, uniform and differential settlement,
and scour potential.
The minimum elevation of the top slope for
the fill section shall be no more than one foot
below the RFD. Minimum distance from any
point of the building perimeter to the top of
the fill slope shall be either 15 feet or twice
the depth of fill at that point, whichever is the
greater distance. This requirement does not
apply to roadways, driveways, playgrounds,
and other related features which are not
integral and functional parts of the building
proper. Fill slopes for granular materials shall
be not steeper than one vertical on 1 -1/2
horizontal, unless substantiating data
justifying steeper slopes are submitted to the
building official and approved. For slopes
exposed to flood velocities of less than five
feet per second, grass or vine cover, weeds,
bushes, and similar vegetation undergrowth
will be considered to provide adequate scour
protection.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.2150 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 612.3.
FPR section 612.3 is amended to read as
follows:
Protection by Dikes, Levees, and Floodwalls:
Dikes, levees, and floodwalls must not be
considered to provide FP1 or FP2
floodproofmg or flood protection unless
277
THE 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE
(1) the dike, levee, or floodwall is built in
accordance with recognized and accepted
engineering practice and methods, and
(2) the design data has been submitted to the
Department of Natural Resources and the
Federal Emergency Management Agency for
revision of the community's flood insurance
study (flood insurance rate map) and official
zoning map.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.2300 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 1101.3.2.
FPR section 1101.3.2 is amended by changing
the "contents class" of food products from X
to 1.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
STAT AUTH: MS s 1613.61
HIST: 15 SR 74
1335.2200 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 802.1.
FPR section 802.1 is amended to read as
follows:
Applicability: Spaces to be intentionally
flooded with flood water (W4) shall be
provided with the necessary equipment,
devices, piping, controls, etc. necessary for
automatic flooding during the flood event and
drainage system(s) shall utilize approved
piping materials and have sufficient capacity
for raising or lowering the internal water level
at a rate comparable to the anticipated rate of
rise and fall of a flood that would reach the
RFD. These pipe systems shall be directly
connected to the external flood waters to
maintain a balanced internal and external
water pressure condition. Provisions shall be
made for filling the lower portions of the
structure first and for interconnections
through or around all floors and partitions to
prevent unbalanced filling of chambers or
parts within the structures. All spaces below
the RFD shall be provided with air vcnts
extending to at least three feet above the
elevation of the RFD to prevent the trapping
of air by the rising water surface. All
openings to the filling and drainage systems
shall be protected by screens or grilles to
prevent the entry or nesting of rodents or
birds in the systems.
1335.2400 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 1301.2.1.
FPR section 1301.2.1 is amended to read as
follows:
Heating systems utilizing gas- or oil -fired
furnaces shall have a float - operated automatic
control valve installed in the fuel supply line
which shall be set to operate when flood
waters reach an elevation equal to the floor
level of the space where furnace equipment is
installed. A manually operated gate valve
that can be operated from a location above the
RFD shall-be provided in the fuel supply line
to serve as a supplementary safety provision
for fuel cutoff. The heating equipment and
fuel storage tanks shall be mounted on and
securely anchored to a foundation pad or pads
of sufficient mass to overcome buoyancy and
prevent movement that could damage the fuel
supply line. As an alternate means of
protection, elevation of heating equipment
and fuel storage tanks above the RFD on
platforms or by suspension from overhead
structural systems will be permitted. All
unfired pressure vessels will be accorded
similar treatment. Fuel lines shall be attached
to furnaces by means of flexible or swing type
couplings. All heating equipment and fuel
storage tanks shall be vented to an elevation
of at least three feet above the RFD. Air
supply for combustion shall be furnished if
required for systems installed in W1 or W2
spaces and piping or duct work for each
purpose shall be terminated at least three feet
278
THE 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE
above the RFD.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.2500 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 1302.2.2.
FPR section 1302.2.2 is amended to read as
follows:
Where the state of dryness of a space is
dependent on a sump pump system, or where
the stability of a structure during a flood event
depends on the relief of uplift pressures on
building components, all interior storm water
drainage or seepage, appliance drainage, and
underslab drain tile systems shall be directly
connected to a sump (pump) and discharged
at an elevation at least three feet above the
RFD.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
Minnesota Department of Health and
Pollution Control Agency in terms of size,
construction, use, and maintenance and with
standards and criteria of the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources regarding
setbacks from normal high water mark of a
watercourse in accordance with the public
water classification.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.2800 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 1302.3.1.
FPR section 1302.3.1 regarding
cesspools /sewage disposals has been amended
by deleting this section in its entirety.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.2900 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 1302.3.2.
1335.2600 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 1302.2.3.1.
FPR section 1302.2.3.1 is amended to read as
follows:
All vents shall extend to an elevation of at
least three feet above the RFD.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.2700 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 1302.3.
FPR section 1302.3 is amended to read as
follows:
Sewage Disposal/Treatment: Individual
sewage disposal and /or treatment facilities
will be permitted in a flood hazard area but
only at locations where connection with a
public sewer system is not permissible or
feasible. Such facilities shall conform to
applicable standards, criteria, and rules of the
FPR section 1302.3.2 regarding seepage pits
has been amended by deleting this section in
its entirety.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.3000 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 1302.4.1.
FPR section 1302.4.1 is amended to read as
follows:
Water supply wells, tanks, filters, softeners,
heaters, and all appliances located below the
RFD shall be protected against contamination
by covers, walls, copings, or castings. All
vents shall be extended to a minimum
elevation of three feet above the RFD.
STAT AUTH: MS s 104.05
1335.3100 FLOODPROOFING
REGULATIONS, SECTION 1405.3.
279
THE 2007 MINNESOTA STATE Bun.DING CODE
FPR section 1405.3 is amended to read as
follows:
Protection by Dikes, Levees, and Floodwalls:
Dikes, levees, and floodwalls must not be
considered to provide floodproofing or flood
protection unless
(1) the dike, levee, or floodwall is built in
accordance with recognized and accepted
engineering practice and methods, and
(2) the design data has been submitted to the
Department of Natural Resources and the
Federal Emergency Management Agency for
revision of the community's flood insurance
study (flood insurance rate map) and official
zoning map.
STAT AUTH: MS s 16B.61
HIST: 15 SR 7
280
Attachment 6
§ 12 -37 MAPLEWOOD CODE
(b) Permit fees shall be assessed for work governed by the building code adopted in section
12 -39 in accordance with the fee schedule adopted by the city bV resolution. In addition, a
surcharge fee shall be collected on all permits issued for work govern y the building code
in accordance with Minn. Stats. § 16B.70.
(Ord. No. 837, § 12 -37, 5 -27 -2003)
Sec. 12 -38. Violations and penalties.
A violation of the building code is a misdemeanor (Minn. Stats. 16B.69).
(Ord. No. 837, 12 -38, 5 -27 -2003)
Sec. 12 -39. Adoption.
(a) This article provides for the application, administration, and enforcement of the
Minnesota State Building Code by regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, alter-
ation, repair, moving, removal, demolition, conversion, occupancy, equipment, use, height,
area, and maintenance of all buildings and/or structures in this city; provides for the issuance
of permits and collection of fees thereof; provides penalties for violation thereof; repeals all
ordinances and parts of ordinances that conflict therewith. This article shall perpetually
include the most current edition of the optional appendix chapters. Optional appendix
chapters shall not apply unless specifically adopted.
(b) This city does ordain as follows:
(1) The Minnesota State Building Code, as adopted by the commissioner of administration
pursuant to Minn. Stats. §§ 16B.59- 16B.75, including all of the amendments, rules
and regulations established, adopted and published from time to time by the state
commissioner of administration, through the building codes and standards division is
hereby adopted by reference with the exception of the optional chapters, unless
specifically adopted in this article. The Minnesota State Building Code is hereby
incorporated in this article as if fully set out this section.
(2) The Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to Minn. Stats. §§ 16B.59-
16B.75 allows the city to adopt by reference and enforce certain optional chapters of
the most current edition of the Minnesota State Building Code.
(3) The following optional provisions identified in the most current edition of the state
building code are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for this
city:
a. 1305, Excavation and Grading.
b. 1306.0020, subpart 3, E with Option 1, Special Fire Protection System.
C. 1335, Floodproofing Regulations.
(Ord. No. 837, § 12 -39, 5 -27 -2003)
CD12 :8
BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 12 -67
Sec. 12 -40. Certificate of occupancy.
(a) No building or structure shall be used or occupied and no change in the existing
occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof shall be made until the
building official has issued a certificate of occupancy as provided in this section. As required
by the city, a certificate of occupancy is required for all occupancies, including groups R -3 and
R -4, with the exception of group U occupancies.
(b) No change in the character of occupancy of a building shall be made without a certificate
of occupancy, as required in the building code. The building official may issue a certificate of
occupancy with secure proper funds or pursuant to the intent of the exception in subsection (a)
of this section, without certifying that the building complies with all sections of this Code.
(c) The fees for a certificate of occupancy and occupancy permits issued under this article
shall be imposed, set, established and fixed by the city council, by resolution, from time to time.
(d) Before issuing a certificate of occupancy, the area surrounding any newly constructed or
newly placed building shall be cleaned up, and all debris shall be completely removed from the
premises to the satisfaction of the building official.
(Code 1982, § 9 -26; Ord. No. 837, § 12 -40, 5 -27 -2003)
Secs. 12- 41- 12 -65. Reserved.
ARTICLE III. BUILDING RELOCATION*
Sec. 12 -66. Permit required.
No person shall move a house or garage over any highway, street or alley in the city without
first receiving approval from the city.
(Code 1982, § 9 -61)
See. 12 -67. Permit application.
An applicant for a permit required under this article shall submit a building relocation
application form and the following materials:
(1) A certified abstractor's list, listing all property owners and their mailing addresses
within 350 feet of the property to which a house is to be moved. Garage relocations
shall be exempt from this requirement.
(2) A legal description of the property to which the building is to be moved.
(3) Photographs showing all four sides of the building and a dimensioned site plan
showing the proposed placement of the structure on the new site.
(4) An application fee to be set by city council resolution.
*State law references -- Moving buildings over highways, Minn. Stats, § 160.26; building
mover regulations, Minn. Stats. § 221.81.
CD12:9
Agenda Item 13
T[):
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PROJECT:
L{}C/\T|[)N:
DATE:
City Manager
Ken Roberts, Planner
Conditional Use Permit Review
Liberty Classical Academy
1717 English SKr88L
&V0USt 9 2007
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit (CUP) for Liberty Classical Academy Ed1717 English Street iS
due for review. The CUP allows 8private school for Upto120students to operate inthe
Lake Phalen Community Church. (See the maps on pages three — five.)
BACKGROUND
On July 22.2003, the city approved the conditional use permit for Liberty Classical Academy.
This approval was subject tO six conditions ofapproval.
[)n June 13.2UO5. the city council reviewed the CUP and approved 8n amendment b]the
permit. This change allowed the school to expand from a maximum of 60 students to a
maximum Of120students. The council also agreed tO review the permit revision in one year.
(See the council minutes starting 0n page six.\
[)n July 10,2U00. the city council approved 8PUD amendment for the property 8t2898
Hazelwood Street. This revision allows Liberty Classical Academy to operate a school for up
to 500 students in the First Evangelical Free Church.
On, August 28 the city council reviewed the CUP for the school 8L1717English
Street. During this meeting, the city council, at the request of a neighbor added several
conditions Cf approval for the school. (See the council minutes On page 11.) One Vfthese
conditions set the maximum numbers of students the school may have at this location at 60.
[)n September 25,20O8 city council reconsidered the condition only allowing the school
to have 60 students and approved the school to allow the previously allowed amount of
students at12O. (See the council minutes on page 12.)
Liberty Classical Academy has been operating the school in the Lake Phalen Community
Church since the fall of 2003. The student population of the school has grown steadily since
they opened the school. This growth required the school to find a second location for their
functions, as they have outgrown the existing location in the Lake Phalen Community
Church.
Since the city approved the school's CUP request for the second location (at 2698
Hazelwood . they plan on having the older students (grades 8-12) attend school in
the new location. The school, at least for now, plans on keeping grades K — 5 in the first
location at 1717 English Street. They may eventually move all the school functions to the
new location on Hazelwood. Such a move would be contingent on many variables, including
the growth of the school population and the needs of First Evangelical Free Church (the
owners of the building).
During the council meeting on August 28, 2006, the city council added several conditions to
the CUP for the school. The council added these conditions after listening to one of the
neighbors of the school and to the representatives of the school. The council added the
conditions to try to address the concerns of the neighbor while still allowing the school to
operate in this location. Unfortunately, one of the new conditions changed the maximum
number of students the school may have from 120 to 60.
On September 25, 2006, the city council reconsidered this condition and increased it back to
120 after the school further explained their vision for the school and addressed the
neighbors' concerns in a letter. Since the council's actions regarding this permit and the
school in 2006, city staff has not received any complaints about the school or its operation.
Review the conditional use permit for Liberty Classical Academy at 1717 English Street
again in one year.
Rsec 161LCA cup review 07
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. June 13, 2005, City Council Minutes
5. Letter dated August 8, 2006 letter from Liberty Classical Academy
6. Letter dated September 15, 2006 letter from Liberty Classical Academy
7. August 28, 2006 city council minutes
8. September 25, 2006 city council minutes
2
N
Location Map
1717 English Street
Attachment 1
Z\
N
186
r
185
183
76
711
Zonin Map
1
1717 Eng sh Street
At to h
Ask
N
m
i
I �
I'
s:
Ask
N
Attachment 4
91 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Revision — Liberty Classical Academy 11717
English Street)
Kathy Smith, representing Liberty Classical Academy
Rebecca He Strom, Director, Liberty Classical Academy
WHEREAS, Ms. Kathy Smith, representing Liberty Classical Academy, is requesting that
Maplewood approve a revision to the conditional use permit for a school to operate in an existing
ch u rc h.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 1717 English Street, The legal description is:
The North 262 feet of the South 531,5 feet of the East '/2 of the SE 1 14 of the SE 1 /4, subject
to streets, in Section 16, Township 29, Range 22 (PIN 16-29-22-44-002 1)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
2, On June 13, 2005, the city council reviewed this proposal. At this meeting the council
considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission, The
council also gave everyone at the meeting a chance to speak and present written
statements,
M.
wzffllun���
rA
d, Updated doors and hardware,
e, The necessary changes to meet the handicapped accessibility code
f. A proper address on the building,
g. Any other changes the fire marshal or the building official deem necessary.
h, All the improvements and chard es listed in and shall meet all the conditions listed
EIMMMMIMMEM
6, The city council shall review this permit revision in one year.
Seconded by Counciimember Rossbach Ayes-All
L-3
Attachment 5
66)
17 17 DiLsh Strcet eta LlewN ood, IV NI 5 5, 109 651. 772 27 77
Dcar Mr, & N-'lrs. (41'-2 V4:)[cj' 8-8-06
As the new school dear approaches. I wanted to send you as letter describing the changes \ve
are making which we hope will alleviate sorne of your concerns. It has always been our
desire to he a -ood neighbor to those around the Lake Plialen Church Property .
, ks you alrcadv know, thc biggest chits Nvie are makin. 0
g f' r the UPCO11111111 School % is thit
we are moving the Middle and Upper school Students to another tacility. ']'his Nvill rOUghlV
cut in halt' tile nurnbVi- ot Students at the Lake Phalcn site in the coming ycar. Fhere are fewer
Phy,ed classes, as a result, which means ICSS use Ot'01C field tae to VOLIJ 110111C,
While we have already atterripted to keep tile ifluAlSiOn 01 'balk into You]' yard at a I minim urn
('bv having the phy cd teacher set garne fields up Using Atlantic "St and the church parking lot
its the direction f'()r the -oil post N realize tla<at bills still ineviiablv enter vour vard now
and then We have offered to put in at fence, but You have implied that you would; prctler not
to have as 6ence, Therctorc, as It stands, we will do our best to continue monitoring our
students and f4nufics to ensure a rulniulal impact (in Your yard I will rcmind
teachers/students/ta III I i ies ol'the houndiry line at - Hack-to School" night and several times
throughout the year. the phy,ed teacher Will continue to keep the goal posts in the opposite
direction frorn Your yard, and wc will corninit to ending official school related activities
Making LISC ol'tbc field at as re.tsomible hour Wsuall� no later than six o'clock), ]'here are
several special events which take place during elvening hours throughout the Year, such IS
Pa rent/1"cachcr conferences, Art/Drania Show, c1c. On these everilligs, the field arid parking
lot may he used by the students as they wait for their parents. etc. To help alleviate any
concern regarding parking on these nights, \,%e will rernind Camthes dint they must park in the
parking lot, it`possible� and J' parking on the street to be sure not to block private driveways.
In order to alleviatc the concern ovcr increased -arbaoc Items in voter viand. the students N-vill,
do a weekly garbage pick-up of'thc fi ari
eld d parking lot, We Nvill also continue to remind
� C -
su1dQnIs to dispose 'A' - arba-c appropriatclv hV using oarbage receptacles.
We Sincerely hope these chati-es v0li bring about a better relationship between you and the
school, We are doing our best to minitnize: the impact of the school on our neighbors while
also ulaintainini I I
g t he nlegrity of'our program tbrour students and their fian
Acadcwic Disti;wnon Ozuisical'!9%difion ChnsIian wor'kivi'm
Attachment 6
SEP s 5 2006
1717 English Street Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mayor Longrey and members of the Maplewood City Council,
9-15-06
On behalf of the Liberty Classical Academy Board of Directors, I am writing to you requesting
that LCA be placed on the City Council meeting agenda for clarification of the CUP renewal for
the Lake Phalen Community Church site that took place on August, 28", 2006.
At that meeting, discussion ensued regarding some issues raised by a neighbor, Greg Votel (along
with a petition he set forth). These issues were discussed and led to an agreement that LCA
would follow through with some measures to alleviate his concerns. When the motion was made
and voted upon, however, the number of students allowed at the Lake Phalen site was reduced
from 120 to 60, The motion and vote occurred very quickly, and I didn't hear that the number
had been reduced. My associate did, however, so I later called to clarify with the city that,
indeed, our CUP had been reduced from the previous number of 120 students to 60 students.
Unfortunately, there was no discussion regarding that change prior to the motion, so I wasn't able
to share LCA's need to keep the total number of students at 120. The school originally had a
CUP of 60 students, when we were only using the lower level classrooms. Then, as the school
grew, the church gave permission to LCA for use of the upstairs classrooms and the 3 floor
library. We received the conditional use permit for 120 students in June of 2005. There were
several costly upgrades that were contingencies of the revision (adding a wall and fire door in the
library, increasing the length of all railings and increasing the height of the rail leading up to the
library). Additionally, just this summer we spent $20,000 adding a water line that will operate
the sprinkler system. Next year, if we stay at Lake Phalen, the sprinkler heads will be installed
which will cost the school another $15,000. If we thought the student enrollment would be
limited to 60, we would not have moved forward with the upgrades. Rather, we would have been
forced to find a different site for the school. The church definitely wants us to stay in their
facility as they are very supportive of our mission and vision. Additionally, if we leave after this
year, the church would be left with half the sprinkler system installed (we were allowed by the
city to do the project in stages, since it is so costly).
We already have 49 students in the lower school this year. We could be up over 60 students as
soon as next year (07-08). Our desire is to have the ability to continue growing the lower school
at the Lake Phalen site and the Middle and Upper school at the First Free site with the idea that
eventually we would have the necessary student enrollment to support a building on our own.
We ask for your careful consideration of this matter and a reversal of the student enrollment cap
back to the previously approved 120 students.
Thanks so much for your thoughtful consideration.
4ncerel si
e& �gUo in
bekah ags
Director
lul
Academic Distinction Classical Tradition 10 Christian Worldview
Attachment
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:UUP.M. Monday, August 28.2OU0
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 08-22
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, 8t City Hall, and was called to
order at 7: 10 P.M. by Mayor Longrie.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Diana LVngh8,Mayor Present
Rebecca Cave Counni|nn8rnber F`r8S8nt
Erik |U8US Present
Kathleen JV8n8nnGnn.{|oVnci|nn8nnb8r Present
Will RoSsbGch.CoUnCi|rnennb8r Present
1' CONSENT AGENDA
MavurLonghe moved to approve consent agenda items 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 11.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All
Mayor Longrie moved to approve consent agenda item 3 with the condition that a notice
section is added to the document so the city has to aooropriate contact address for the developer.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
Mayor Longrie moved to approve the conditional use permit, agenda item 4 with the
conditions that school activities shall be completed by 6:00 p.m., litter will be nicked up as needed, a
garbage can will be outside, the school will contain grades kindergarten through 5 th grade with a
maximum of 60 students, and four evening events to go no later than 9:30 ip.m.
Seconded bvC0Un[j|[n8nlbSrRoSsbGCh |
CoVn[i|memb8rHeUe moved to apProve consent agenda item 6.
Seconded byCounCi|noenoberCave Ayes-All
CVVnci|memberHUe||e moved to approve consent agenda item 7.
Ayes-All Seconded by Councilmember Cave
Ayes-All Councilmember Hjelle moved to apiprove consent agenda item 10.
Seconded by Councilmember Cave
Im
MINUTES
�[��C�Ol�nt�
����PLEW��{��� CITY COUNCIL
7:04 P.M. Monday, September 25, 2008
Council {|hGnnb8rs. City Hall
Meeting N0. 00-25
A meet of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, @t City Hall, and was ca tO order 8t
7:04 P.M. by Mayor Longrie.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Diana Lnngh8,Mayor Present
Rebecca Cave CVVn[i|nn8nnUer Present
Erik |Ue||9 Present
Kathleen JuRD9[nGDD.00uDCi|[nS[nbRr Present
Will RoSsbGch.CoVnCi|rnennb8r Present
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Reconsiderat — Conditional Use Permit Review (Liberty Classical Academy —1717English
o. Planner Roberts presented the report.
b. The following person was heard:
Kathy Smith, 1964 Price Avenue, Maplewood
Councilmember Rossbach moved to set 120 as the maximum number of students that the
Liberty Classical Academy may have at their location at 1717 Eng-lish Street and approved to
review the conditional use permit for Liberty Classical AcademV at 1717 English Street again in
February 2007.
Seconded by CoVnC|nlemU9rJU8n8nn8nn
Ayes
City Council 08-25-06
.-.genda Item 14
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: 8h8nn Finvv8U Planner
SUBJECT: Kline NissamDemlership — Comditimmal Use Permit Review
LOCATION: 3090 Maplewood Drive
DATE: August 17. 2007
The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Kline Nissan Dealership located at 3090 Maplewood
Drive iS due for review. The CUP was required for o maintenance garage t0b8 located within
the Light Manufacturing (M-1) zoning district.
May 28 the city council approved 8 CUP tO allow for o maintenance garage t0b8
operated within 8 motor vehicle dealership as well as design review for the Kline Nissan
dealership. Refer k] the May 28,2OO2 city council minutes attached.
June 24, 2002, the city council approved a 75-foot-wide wetland buffer setback variance in
order to a||Vvv Kline Nissan's parking |VL LV be constructed to within 25 feet ofthe vv8U8nd
located Vn the south side Vf the lot and 5O feet Of the wetland located On the north side [f the
|0t. Refer t0 the June 24 city council minutes attached.
October 27 the city council approved 8 one-year extension to Kline Nissan's conditional
use permit.
Summer 2005 the city constructed a frontage road east of Maplewood Drive (Highway 61),
extending from the northerly old County Road D south to Maplewood Imports. The frontage
road was part Vf the County Road [) realignment project and was constructed for access to the
three automobile d8@|SrS |0C8tBd OD the east side Of Highway 81, including Kline Nissan. Refer
tO the frontage road site plan attached.
January 23.20O0. the city council approved 8 one-year extension to Kline Nissan's conditional
use permit.
DISCUSSION
The completion of the frontage road in front of the Kline Nissan dealership has improved and
made access h] the site safer. The frontage road is currently a public hgNt-Vf-vv8}( but will be
turned over to the dealerships in a year or two and will then become a private access road.
The Kline Nissan dealership has a subsurface water infiltration system installed in their parking
lot LO help treat water 8s it runs off the site. /\S part 0f the CUP conditions, Kline Nissan was
required LO sign 8 maintenance agreement with the city which states that they will have the
system inspected annually and that sediment will be removed from all storm and catch basin
structures. On May 31, 2007, Kline Nissan submitted their yearly inspection and cleaning
invoice and it reflects that the system is operating corre{t|y.
During the first year in Op8r8tk}D the dealership stored their du[noSterwithin the Dl8iDtRDGOce
garage. Since Kline Nissan opened, however, the maintenance garage has been modified S0
that there iSnO longer space in the garage L0 store the dUrnonteng. For this reason, Kline
Nissan recently obtained 8 permit to construct 8dVrnpsL8renclosure on the rear side oftheir
building to shore the dunnp3tenS. The enclosure will be constructed of 0-foot-high chain link
fence and gate with privacy slats which meets city code requirements.
As part of Kline Nissan's wetland setback variance approval they were required to improve the
wetland buffer with native plantings (dogwood ahRJbS). During initial inspections Of the buffer
earlier this summer it appeared that several of the shrubs had died or were overgrown with
weeds. Since that time, Kline Nissan representatives have discussed the best management
practices for the vvRUGnd buffer with the city's n8LUn8|isL. They will be following the city
naturalist's suggestions for weed management and plant maintenance within the buffer
throughout the summer and fall and hope to have the wetland buffer back to its approved
condition by next spring.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit for Kline Nissan 3090 Maplewood Drive again in one year to
ensure compliance with all required conditions. The conditional use permit can b9reviewed
sooner if@ problem arises 0r the applicants propose 8 major Ch8DgetOthSSibS.
P:Sec 3\Nissan 2007 CUP Review
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
a. Frontage Road Site Plan
1. May 2o.0000. City Council Minutes
o. June 24.2no2. City Council Minutes
K
Attachment 1
1-694 - - - --- ----- - ---- ----- - ---- ----
0 0
-,ol
0
l
3090 Maplewood Drive
Kline Nissan
we 40
TOT Teem LITA
Attachment 2
C 0 U N T Y R 0 A 0
S 89 E
, 66.96 ---
PYLON SIGN.
VEMFY SZF.
STYLE AND
L=nON
OATH OWN
OUU, CURB
* Buor,
1312 CCURa AND DETAIL f
TIM SM DETAIL_
2/Al
%. {A•t� Q41
EDGE OF =NEATM
Mtt WETLANDS
POSM
.711. I PROI Jam. MAL0140 Oor H CH
t IU43 sr. AT
VMF L=14
INT. ROOF OR -
W/ CVMFLOW W/ CONTRAL
TOR
40. to, SCUPPER (5) IT TT CURB AND
' s 31 CUTTER 5SE DETAIL
2/Al
0 S
MONUMEN s
T
VEMFY V
23
r, STYLE
a. 0 It
WCATZON
)MTM amot
7
P 14 1 DETAfL 6,(Ar--
At (4 IiSiJ IN 01 WMA 07T�
SMACK
DRSIING
Q. . . . . . . . . . .
nF DELINEATED
. . . . . . . . . . . .
zc
7'
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 M it
MrE OF DEULNEATED
R=2789.71097i/ z
wmmo- k 139�Z 46 7- WMANOS
L-12.72 SETBACX. TYP.
NORTH
SITE PLAN led N
5CALL: V - 40 -0 40 ��
Site Plan
12
�t
�� Attachment 3
MINUTES -MAPLEVVO0O CITY COUNCIL Attachment 4
7:O0F!yW, Tuesday, May 28,2O02
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 02-11
8:52 Kline Nissan Vehicle Dealership-3090 and 3110 K8ap|8vvVVd Drive
Wetland Setback Variance
Conditional Use Permit
Design Approval
o. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented the report.
b. Associate Planner Roberts presented the specifics Of the report.
c. Commissioner RoGsb8ch presented the Planning Commission report.
d. Boardmember Olson presented the Community Design Review Board report
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents.
The following persons were heard:
Rick Kline, Owner, Kline Nissan
Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution approving the
conditional use permit for the Nissan dealership at 3090 and 3110 Maplewood Drive:
RESOLUTION 02-05-097
CONDITIONAL USE PEF{K8|T RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Rich Kline, of Kline Auto World, applied for G conditional use permit for a
motor vehicle maintenance garage as part of a new Nissan dealership;
WHEREAS, this permit applies toproperties at3U80 and 3110 Maplewood Drive. The
property identification numbers are 03-29-22-22-OOO2 and 03-29-22-22-00O3. The legal
description is:
Tract "A", Registered Land Survey No. 15.On file in the office of the Registrar of Titles
within and for said County, except that part lying e8st9dyVfa|imebeginninQEd8pOintVn
the north line of said Tract 1494.91 feet vv8Si of the northeast corner of said Tn8Ci'
thence southeasterly 8t8D angle Of58 degrees, 43 minutes with said north line 445.39
feet; thence 8t8n angle of78 degrees 39 minutes k] the right 188.7 feet k]8 point 0nthe
south line 0f said Tract 13O3.88 feet west from the s0ULh88St corner Of said Tract,
Ramsey County, Minnesota. Torn8nSCertifioote Number: 171003.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On May 0. 2002. the planning D0rnnnisGkJn recommended that the ohv council
approve this permit.
2.On May 28.2OU2. the city council held 8 public hearing. The city staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices k] the surrounding property owners. The
council gave everyone GL the hearing 8 chance L0 speak and present written
Gi8LRrnRnLG. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city
staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED that the city council approved the above-
described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approves
this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code Ofordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding
area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance L0 any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke,
dust, odor, funnea, water Or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only Olininno| vehicular traffic on |OC@| StFSRta and vvOU|d not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access 0n existing 0r proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including
8tr8eLS, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems,
schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
8. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval ia subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved bv the city. The director Of
community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this
deadline for one year.
3. The applicant shall not load Or unload vehicles on public [ight-0fvv8y
4. Cars can only be parked on designated paved surfaces.
5. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded byC0UDCi|nlBnlbgrNbppeO Av8S-A||
a
Attachment
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
Y:0OP.K4., Monday, June 24.2O02
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting N0. 02-13
2. Kline Nissan Dealership Wetland Setback Variance Reconsideration /31O0 Highway 81\
8. City Manager Fursm8n presented the report.
b. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented the specifics Of the report.
C. Clifton A.AiChiDgBr, Ramsey/Washington K8RtFU VV8tSrShmd outlined the Metro
Watershed's position.
d. Rick Kline, owner, Kline Auto VVodd. spoke about the pnnp03o|.
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the following variance resolution (50 foot buffer
on the NE side, and 25 feet On all other sides with 8n infiltration system installed ODall
sides), for the Nissan Dealership site plan:
RESOLUTION 02-06-119
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Rick Kline, of Kline Auto World, applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance.
WHEREAS, this variance applies hJ properties ot308O and 311O Maplewood Drive. The
property identification numbers are O3-2S-22-22-00O2 and 03-29-22-22-UUO3. The legal
description is:
Tract "A", Registered Land Survey No. 15, on file in the office 0fthe Registrar of Titles within
and for said County, except that part lying easterly of a line beginning at a point on the north line
of said Tract 1494.91 feet west of the northeast corner of said Tract; thence southeasterly at an
angle of 58 degrees, 43 minutes with said north line 445.3Sfeet; thence at an angle Of7S
degrees 39 minutes t0 the right 188.7 feet tO8 point On the south line 0f said Tract 13O3.88feet
west from the southeast corner of said Tract, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Tbrn8OaC8rtifioot8
Number: 171003.
WHEREAS, Section 3G-18G(h)(3)Of the wetland protection Ordin8noeneqUines81OO-foo
wide wetland buffer.
WHEREAS, the 8ouiC8nt proposed 8 75-foot-wide vv8t8Dd buffer.
WHEREAS, the city council approved a wetland buffer variance ranging from a 50-foot-wide
buffer on the northeast side of the property to a 75-foot-wide buffer on the south and southeast
sides of the site.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is8Gfollows:
1. On May 6, 2002, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
2. The city council held 8 public hearing OD May 28.20O2. City staff published 8 notice iDthe
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law.
The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written
statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and
planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described
variance for the following reasons:
a. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the property and not created by the property owner. The 10U-h}ot+wide
wetland buffer requirement would make development of this site difficult.
b. The variance would b8in keeping with the spirit 8ndintentVfihe ordinance, since the
applicant would improve a portion of the wetland buffer substantially over its present
state and will treat storm water from the site with a subsurface storm water infiltration
system.
c. The city council previously approved similar wetland buffer variances for three
developments near this proposal.
Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following:
G. Dedicating 850-hJ0t wetland protection buffer easement along the northeast lot line and
a 25-foot wetland protection buffer easement along the remaining wetland edge. This
easement shall be prepared by a land surveyor, shall describe the boundary of the buffer
and shall prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. The
applicant shall record this easement before the city will issue a building permit.
b. Submitting 8 revised grading p|8O showing compliance with the required wetland
dedications. The grading plan shall |ndUd8 grading to within 18 feet Vf the wetland 9dQ8
On the side where the 50-fOoL buffer is required, with n8sk]n8tiOn of the remaining 40 feet
of wetland buffer consisting of native plantings to be approved by staff and the
watershed district /see landscape requirement Ue|Vvv\.
C. Submitting 8 revised |8DdsoopS plan for the restoration of 40 feet of the wetland-
protection buffer on the northeast side of the site and for the 25-foot buffer in the other
wetland buffer areas. This plan Sh8|| be subject to staff and watershed district approval.
Underground irrigation is required for all landscaped areas, excluding the wetland
protection bUffec
d. Installing signs 8tthe edge Of the wetland-protection buffer which prohibit any building,
mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer.
Submitting 8 signed maintenance agreement h]the Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed
District and the city for maintenance of the subsurface storm water infiltration system that
accepts responsibility for any necessary maintenance and upkeep of the system.
Seconded hvCoUn[i|mernb9rKoopen Ayes-Mayor Cardinal, CoUnCi|nlennb8rG Collins and
Koppen
Nays-Council members Juenemann and Wasiluk
2
Agenda Item 15
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: CharleS/\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer
Erin [@ber8e. Assistant City EDQiD88r
SUBJECT: Authorization to Purchase Total Station for Engineering Services Program
DATE: August 1.2007
The surveyors in the Engineering Department currently use two total stations for topographic and
COnStn]CtkJO surveying. One of the total stations is 20 years (dd is outdated and not n8|i@b|8. This total
station is DO |ODg9r in use. Engineering staff needs two total stations t0 d0 CODStnJCtiOD staking on this
year's project 8ndt0poQn8ph|c surveying on next years projects concUrpent|y.|iisno|on08r8cVnonnit8|k]
repair Or replace parts Of the equipment that are not functioning.
Two quotes have been received for a new total station and necessary components. The first quote from
Frontier Precision is for $15,124.07 and the second from Northwest Laser and Instruments for $16,649.15.
Expenditures in several funds within the Engineering Departments budget are significantly lower than
anticipated. A fund transfer from the overtime fund and the temporary wages fund would cover the cost of a
total station.
It is recommended that the city council approve the purchase of the total station and required components
from Frontier Precision amount of $15,124.07 and authorize the City Engineer to make the necessary fund
transfers.
Attachments:
1. Quote from Frontier Precision
2. Quote from Northwest Laser and Instruments
Northwest Lasers & Instruments, Inc.
Date: August I3, 2007
City of Maplewood
Attention: Jason Kreger
Dear Jason
Thank you for considering Northwest Lasers & Instruments for your total station
needs. The following quotation is for the Total Station you had requested. If you have
any questions regarding this quotation please feel free to call.
The Sokkia Set 530R total station w /(2) TDS Rangers package to include:
I -
Sokkia Set 530 R3( 5 ") Manual Total Station # 6552 -25
$ 7,995.00
Includes: Batteries and Charger
2-
Ranger to Instrument Cables
$ 200.00
2-
Wood Tripods
$ 300.00
2-
8ft Prism Pole # 67- 4708TMA
$ 290.00
2-
Single Prism w /Target # 63 -2010M
$ 250.00
TDS Ramer Options
TDS Ranger w /Survey Pro Software 300x (312Mhz Processor) $ 3,299.00 each x L = (Q 5 9 F- 0 C)
TDS Ranger w /Survey Pro Software 500x (512Mhz Processor)
Above price does not include applicable sales tax.
Thank you,
f ,.
0, %�
Rob Luers
Northwest Lasers & Instruments, Inc.
$ 3,799.00 each
15633. oc 5uoTo- ,-A c-
i 5 T,1 TA L
2200 University Ave Suite 100 St Paul MN 55114 (651) 645 -3828 Fax (651) 645 -4832
,- T V i m b I e
GPS- Constivction- Survey- Software - Machine Controls
Agenda Item 16
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Erin Laberee, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Walgreens at Beam and White Bear Avenue, City Project 04-37,
Approve Developer's Agreement
DATE: July 27th, 2006
The Walgreens at Beam Avenue and White Bear Avenue has been approved by the City Council.
Conditions of approval required the developer to post $9,000 for the future installation of sidewalk along
Beam Avenue in conjunction with the White Bear Avenue Improvements by Ramsey County.
BACKGROUND
As part of the conditions of approval for Walgreens, it is required that the Developer post to the City $9,000
for the future construction of a sidewalk along Beam Avenue. Typically, the developer would be required to
construct this sidewalk, but due to the upcoming White Bear Avenue reconstruction, the intersection at
Beam Avenue will be reconfigured and the proper location of the sidewalk is unknown at this time. When
White Bear Avenue is reconstructed, the sidewalk will be constructed. The agreement details this
requirement.
0* 614] LY, I LY, 14 Z I BY-A 1 [01 ki
It is recommended that council approve the Developer's Agreement between W.B. - Beam, L.L.0 and the
City of Maplewood.
Attachment:
1. Developer's Agreement
CITY 0FMAPLEWOOO
Ramsey County, Minnesota
Development Agreement for
VVG|Qr88nSat Beam Avenue and White Bear Avenue
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day Of August, 20OY between the City of
Maplewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation, acting by and through its mayor and city
[n8DGg8[. herein CG||Rd the CITY, VV.B.-BSorn @ K8iDORaOt@ Limited Liability
Company herein called the OWNER and Meer Construction, Inc. a Minnesota
Corporation, herein called the DEVELOPER.
|N CONSIDERATION Cf the following mutual agreements and covenants, the
parties hereby agree as follows:
|n consideration Of the CITY accepting the Walgreens development, the
DEVELOPER Sh8U provide all internal water systems, SLVnn water
management facilities, sanitary sewers and street improvements, including
concrete curb and gutter, signing, landscaping and other improvements as
specified herein, all in conformance with current City standards, more
specifically outlined in the Special Conditions, Plans and Specifications
attached to this contract. All internal inlpnJv8[n8Dts constructed by the
DEVELOPER shall b8 considered private utilities and/or improvements and
shall b8 maintained by the DEVELOPER Vr their assign. The exception tothe
private inlpn3v8nlentS iS the sidewalk along Beam Ave. The OWNER
warrants that he is the owner of the property proposed for the construction of
VVa|Qn8ens and maintains all rights and obligations necessary tV construct the
said i[nprOvR[nRDtS.
2. The DEVELOPER agrees Ln provide a cash escrow in the form nfcash
deposit for the construction of sidewalk along Beam Avenue. The City shall
construct this sidewalk when the White Bear Avenue Street Improvements
are constructed in2UO8. The cash escrow shall b8in the amount 0f$9.00U.
3. The OWNER agrees to dedicate at no cost LVthe city, 10 feet Vfright away
along White Bear Avenue for the future reconstruction of White Bear Avenue
in2OUGoS specifically shown On the plan attached hereto 8s Exhibit A.
4. The OWNER 8gr88S to 8x8cUte, prior to issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy, o maintenance agreement establishing the maintenance
requirements and responsibilities for the storm sewer treatment structures.
5. Cash 8GcnJvv shall be letter of credit or cash deposit. If the surety is in the
form of letter 0fcredit, the letter 0fcredit rnUGt clearly indicate that it is an
irrevocable letter of credit (from a financial institution approved by the City
Attorney) in the n8nn8 of the City of K8ap|8vvVOd. p8y8U|8 on demand, to
assure compliance with the terms [f this developer's agreement. The letter Cf
credit shall beofo one-year duration and must have 8 condition indicating
renewal, automatic with notification to the CITY 8 nnininnurn ofSOdGys prior to
its expiration.
8. The DEVELOPER shall complete the public works improvements, if any,
covered by this agreement by no later than April 30.2009.NO deviation from
the required completion date shall b8 permitted unless approved in writing by
the CITY. After receipt Vf written notice from the DEVELOPER Vfthe
existence of causes over which the DEVELOPER has no control which will
delay the completion of the work, the CITY, ot its discretion, may extend the
completion date and any financial sureties required shall be continued k}
cover the work during the extension 0ftime.
4
7. The DEVELOPER shall furnish all engineering, architectural and
administrative services for the private improvements and building projects.
O. The DEVELOPER agrees that the work shall bS done and performed iDthe
best and most workmanlike manner; and all rn8teh U
materials and
strict conformity with respect LO the approved Plans and Specifications and
improvement standards of the City of Maplewood, and shall be subject to the
inspection and approval of the CITY nra duly authorized engineer 0fthe
CITY; and in case any material or labor supplied shall be rejected bythe
CITY Or engineer 8S defective O[ unsuitable, then such rejected Qn8tR[i8|Sho||
be removed and replaced with approved material tO the satisfaction and
approval Of the CITY or engineer and ai the sole cost and expense of the
DEVELOPER.
9. After completion of any private work required by the DEVELOPER within
public right-of-way Ur easements, the City engineer orthe City engineer's
designated representative and a representative of the OEVELOPER'n
engineer will make a final inspection of the work. This provision shall apply
only to work within public right-of-way or easements. The City engineer will
not inspect or warrant any private work conducted by the contractor or
contractors hired by the DEVELOPER.
10. |tis further agreed, anything tO the contrary herein notwithstanding, that the
City of Maplewood City Council and its agents or employees shall not b8
personally liable or responsible in any manner k} the OWNER, DEVELOPER,
the DEVELOPER'S contractor orsubcontractor, nl8t8ri8| SUpp|iena |@b0nanS
ort0 any other person nr persons whomsoever, for any claim, demand,
damages, actions Vr causes [f action of any kind or character arising out Cf
0rby reason Of the execution 0f this agreement O[ the performance and
It]
completion of the work or the improvements provided herein, which the
DEVELOPER will save the CITY harmless from all such claims, demands,
damages, actions Or causes Of action Or the costs disbursements and
expenses of defending the same, specifically including, without intending to
limit the categories [f said costs, cost and expenses for CITY administrative
time and labor, costs of consulting engineering services, and costs of legal
services rendered in connection with the defending such claims as may be
brought against the CITY. |tiS further agreed that the DEVELOPER will
furnish the City of Maplewood proof of insurance in the amount as required
by the approval specifications covering any public liability or property damage
Uy reason nfthe operation of the DEVEL{)PER's equipment, laborers, and
hazard caused by said improvement.
11. Breach of any terms of this agreement by the DEVELOPER shall begrounds
for denial of building or occupancy permits for the Walgreens building until
the DEVELOPER corrects such breach.
12. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall
be invalid, i||Rg@| or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality and
enforceability of the remaining provisions contained herein and any other
application thereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
13. The terms and conditions of this agreement shall be binding on the parties
hereto, their respective successors and assigns 8ndLh8b8n8fitS8ndbVnd8nS
shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property.
In the event that this ognSS[nSOt is naD0[d9d. the CITY, DEVELOPER and
OWNER hereby agree to execute and record a termination of this agreement
upon issuance Vfa Certificate OfOccupancy.
14. Notices. Whenever iL shall b8 required 0r permitted by this Agreement that
notice 0rdemand be given or served by either party to0r0D the other party,
1H
such notice Or demand shall be delivered personally 0r mailed bvUnited
States mail t0 the addresses hereinafter set forth bv certified mail. Such
notice O[ demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally Or
when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses nf
the parties hereto for such rnoi| purposes are as follows, until vvhUen notice Of
such address has been given:
A9{D the City: City OfMap
1830 County Road BEast
Maplewood, MN 55108
As to the Landowner: W.B. — Beam, LLC
C/o Semper Development, Ltd
80 South Eight Street
Suite 1275
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
SIGNATURES FOR OWNER
AN
STATE OFMINNESOTA )oa.
COUNTY DFHENNEP|N \
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before m8 this day of
August, 2007, by
of the Owner.
Notary Public
�
SIGNATURES FOR DEVELOPER
MEER CONSTRUCTION, INC.
011
STATE OF MINNESOTA ss.
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
August, 2007, by
, the
of the Owner.
SIGNATURES
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD:
Diana Longrie, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA ss.
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2007, by Diana Longrie, Mayor, of the City of
Maplewood, a municipal corporation.
Notary Public
SIGNATURES
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD:
Greg Copeland, City Manager
STATE OFMINNESOTA )oa.
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before nn8 this day 0f
2007.bv Greg Copeland, City Manager, of the City of
Maplewood, a municipal corporation.
Notary Public
7
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
WE
SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT
1. Project |nfn[mGtkJD:
a. Name: Walgreena
C. Engineer: Pk}vv8EngiO8GhDg
d. General Contractor: Meer Construction
8. Financ Guarantees:
(1) Type: Cash Escrow (Sidewalk along Beam Avenue)
2. Scope of work contemplated under the terms 0fthis contract and covered bv
escrow guarantee are outlined in the conditions of development approval from
the December 11 m .2000 city council meet (see attached [ninutes\.
�
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:2OP.K8. Monday, December 11.20O0
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. O0-33
New Business
2. VV8| (Northeast Corner of White Bear and Beam Avenues)
Lot Division
Land Use Plan Amendment /LBCtoBC)
Zoning Map Change /LBChoBC)
Design Review
a. Planner Finwall presented the report.
b. John Kohler, Architect, S9mpor Development, was present for
council questions.
S. Matt Reagan, Construction Manager, Meer Construction, |nC,
addressed sidewalk issues.
d. Scott Reagan, Meer Construction, answered council questions.
e. Commissioner Grover, representing the Maplewood Planning
Commission, presented the Planning Commission report.
Mayor Longrie moved to approve the lot div
2.83-acre lot located on the northeast corn
requirements (Section 34-14 - lot divisions) and is subdect to the following:
8. Submit G revised survey t0 staff for approval which shows the
1 ) Legal descriptions of Parcels A and B.
2) Location and legal description Cf8 utility and access
easement on the east side of Parcel AtOaccommodate utilities and
access for the property to the north i205O White Bear Avenue) and
access for the property to the east (Parcel B).
3) Location and legal description OfGD access easement 0D
the north side of Parcel A and the south side of the property k} the north
/2950 White Bear Avenue) to accommodate the driveway located 0nthe
north side of the VV8|gr8ens' building and the shared curb cut onWhite
Bear Avenue.
4\ Location and legal description 0f8ten-fo0t-wid8roadway
easement along White Bear Avenue the entire length of Parcel Ato
accommodate for future roadway widening.
44,
b. Deeds describing the two new legal descriptions for Parcels A and
B, including the required utility, access, and roadway easement
descriptions described above.
C. Deeds must be recorded with Ramsey County within one year of
the date of lot division approval or the lot division will become null and
void (city code requirement).
d. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit for the proposed
Walgreens retail store and pharmacy on Parcel A, the following must be
submitted to staff for approval:
1 ) Proof that Ramsey County has recorded the deeds.
2) A signed certificate of survey for Parcel A showing the location
of all property lines, building, parking, driveway, freestanding
sign, and easements.
Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following comprehensive
land use plan change resolution. This resolution changes the
comprehensive land use plan for the newly subdivided 1.54 acre western
lot (Parcel A) n the vacant lot located on the northeast corner of Beam an
White Bear Avenues from Limited Business Commercial (LBC) to
Business Commercial (13C):
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION 06-12-153
WHEREAS, Sernper Development, representing Walgreens,
applied for a change to the city's comprehensive land use plan from Limited
Business Commercial (LBC) to Business Commercial (BC).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the west 253 feet of the vacant
property located on the northeast comer of Beam and White Bear Avenues
(Parcel A as described in the October 5, 2006, Lot Split Boundary Exhibit).
WHEREAS, the property identification number for the property is 02 -29-
22 -24 -0004.
WHEREAS, the legal description of Parcel A is as follows:
That part of the South 284.96 feet of the South 731.5 feet of the Southeast
Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29 North, Range 22 lying East of
the
center line of White Bear Avenue, Except the part thereof described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest
10
Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, said point being 175 feet Northerly
of
the South line of said Southeast Quarter; thence Northerly 556.5 feet along the
East
line; thence 354.5 feet due Nest; thence 350 feet due South; thence in a
Southeasterly
direction to a point which is 120 feet due West of the point of beginning; thence
Northwesterly along last said line 166.75 feet to the north line of the said South
284.96 feet; thence along last said north line, South 89 degrees 19 minutes 05
seconds
Nest a distance of 94.73 feet; thence deflecting left 90 degrees, South 00 degrees
40
minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 284.96 feet to the east 1 west quarter line of
said Section 2; thence along said east /west quarter line, North 89 degrees 19
minutes
05 seconds East to the center of said Section 2; thence northerly along the East
line of
the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2 a distance of
175.00
feet to the point of beginning; according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof,
Ramsey County, Minnesota. Subject to the right of way for Beam Avenue and
White
Bear Avenue and encumbrances as shown on an ALTA survey prepared by
Houston
Engineering dated March 24, 2006. Containing approximately 67,013 square
feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On November 20, 2006, the planning commission held a public hearing.
The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent
notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written
statements prior to their recommendation.
2. On December 11, 2006, the city council discussed the land use plan
change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning
commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approved
the above - described change to the land use plan for the following reasons:
11
1. Provide for orderly development.
2. Protect and strengthen neighborhoods.
3. Promote economic development that will expand the property tax
baS8, increase jobs and provide desirable services.
4. Minimize the land planned for streets.
5. Minimize conflicts between land uses.
0. Prevent premature use, overcrowding, or overuse Ofland
especially when supportive services and facilities, such aSutilities,
drainage systems, or streets are not available.
7. Help to implement the gOo|S of the C0QnpFSh8OSive p|8D including:
o\ The city will not approve new development without
providing for adequate facilities and services, such as
street, utilities, drainage, parks, and open space.
b) Safe and adequate access will b8 provided for all
properties.
C\ Transitions between distinctly differing types Of land uses
should not create 8 negative economic, social, orphysical
impact on adjoining developments.
d\ Whenever possible, changes in types Of land use should
occur so that similar uses front on the same street oredborders
of areas separated by major nn8n- made Vr natural barriers.
9\ The city coordinates land use changes with the character
[f each neighborhood.
D Group compatible businesses in suitable areas.
g\ Avoid disruption of adjacent Or nearby [8Sid8Dti8| 8[88S.
Seconded byCVUnCi|nn8nnberCave Av8g-A||
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following resolution
approve the zoning map ch5`_nqe for the newly subdivided 1.54 acre
ZONING MAP CHANGE RESOLUTION 06-12-154
WHEREAS, Scraper Development, representing Walgreens, onohcd for
a change a/ the city's zoning map from Limited Business [ommercin|(L0[)10
12
Business Commercial (BC).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the west 25' 3 feet of the vacant
property located on the northeast comer of Beam and White Bear Avenues
(Parcel A as described in the October 5, 2006, Lot Split Boundary Exhibit).
WHEREAS, the property identification number for the property is 02 -29-
22 -24 -0004.
WHEREAS, the legal description for Parcel A is as follows:
That part of the South 284.96 feet of the South 731.5 feet of the Southeast
Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29 North, Range 22 lying East of
the
center line of White Bear Avenue, Except the part thereof described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, said point being 175 feet Northerly
of
the South line of said Southeast Quarter; thence Northerly 556.5 feet along the
East
line; thence 354.5 feet due West; thence 350 feet due South; thence in a
Southeasterly
direction to a point which is 120 feet due West of the point of beginning; thence
Northwesterly along last said line 166.75 feet to the north line of the said South
284.96 feet; thence along last said north line, South 89 degrees 19 minutes 05
seconds
West a distance of 94.73 feet; thence deflecting left 90 degrees, South 00 degrees
40
minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 284.96 feet to the east 1 west quarter line of
said Section 2; thence along said east /west quarter line, North 89 degrees 19
minutes
O5 seconds East to the center of said Section 2; thence northerly along the East
line of
the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2 a distance of
175.00
feet to the point of beginning; according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof,
Ramsey County, Minnesota. Subject to the right of way for Beam Avenue and
White
13
Bear Avenue and encumbrances om shown uoanALT& survey by
Houston
Engineering dated March 24, 2006. Containing approximately 67,013 square
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
l. (}o November 2U the planning con�o�imm�nzboklunuhUc .
The chvu�dTnuh�abcduhearing notice bothe Maplewood Review and sent
notices lo the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements prior to
their recommendation.
2. {)u December l|,2UOh the city council discussed the land use plan
change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning
commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED that the city council approve the
above change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure Ord9tn]CtfnJD1
the use Ofneighboring property 0r from the character Ofthe
neighborhood, and that the use Cf the property adjacent bJ the area
included in the proposed change Or plan iS adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have m] negative effect upon the
logical, efficient, and economical extension Of public services and
t8Ci|iUeS. such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection,
and schools.
Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All
Mayor Longrie moved to approve the glans date-stamr)ed October 2,
8. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit
for this project.
14
b. Prior to issuance ofa grading Or building permit, the applicant must
submit to staff for approval the following items:
1\ Revised grading/drainage/utility plans which comply with all city
engineering department requirements 8G specified in the
November 20, 2008, engineering report indUdinQ, but not |irniL8d
to, the granting ofohght-of-vvay easement along White Bear
Avenue and the submittal Cf8n escrow k} the city k}ensure
construction [f8 six-foot-wide sidewalk 8|VnQ the length of Beam
Avenue adjacent VVo|gre8n'3 development t0b8 complete bythe
city in2OU8.
2\ Revised site plan showing o bike rack t0b8 located near the
building entrance.
3) A revised lighting 8ndDh0t0mSthCSD|8nvvhichahOvvSth@tthR
overall illumination from outdoor lights does not exceed A-h}0L
oand|8SotoUpropedv|inea.
4) Obtain 8 permit from Ramsey County for construction on county
h0 for the driveway access, utility work, and sidewalk.
5) Watershed district approval if revisions warrant 8new review.
G) A cash escrow Vr8n irrevocable letter Of credit for all required
exterior improvements. The amount shall Le150 percent Ofthe
cost of the work.
C. Si n88eontheprnpedvi3padOfthedeSignreviawappnJvo|andia
subject to the following sign criteria:
1) One freestanding sign tobR located OD the corner 0f Beam and
White Bear Avenue. Freestanding sign h]b88[n@xinlUnl0f15
feet in height, 0U square feet in area, maintain 81U-fo[t setback to
all property lines and comply with traffic visibility requirements.
2) Two \8/a|or8ens wall signs LOb8 located on the south and west
fd8v8tk}D. Signs tOb8 constructed Of individual letters with @
rn8xinnVrn letter height of two feet and must be c8nL8n8d within the
manufactured limestone facade.
3) Two one-hour photo signs and two pharmacy signs tobelocated
on the south and west elevation. Signs L0b8 constructed Uf
individual letters with @ nn8xi[nu[n letter height Of 1.5 feet, and
rnUsL be centered within the nnanUt8[tUped |inn8Gton8 piers, above
the windows.
4) One drive-through pharmacy directional sign tob8 located above
the standing Se80 mRb3| roof on the south elevation. Sign to be
constructed of individual letters with G [n8xinlU[n letter height Of
1.5 feet.
15
5) One interior entrance tower neon sign, 22 square feet in area.
d. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying th8bVi|dinQ:
1) Replace any property irons removed because of this construction.
2) Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking
lot and driveways.
3\ Install all required landscaping and underground irrigation.
4) Screen the rooftop mechanical equipment.
5\ Install all required outdoor lighting.
e. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy
1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public
health, safety or welfare.
2) The above-required letter 0f credit 0r cash escrow iG held bvthe
City 0fMaplewood for all required exterior improvements. The
owner 0r contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior
improvements by June 1if occupancy of the building iSin the fall
or winter, Vr within six weeks [f occupancy of the building if
occupancy iSin the spring Orsummer.
All work shall follow the approved plans. The director 0fcommunity
development may approve minor changes.
Im
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-
10
Agenda Item 17
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Bill Priefer, Public Works Operations Analyst
SUBJECT: Mogren Street Improvements, City Project 06-17, Resolution
Approving Cooperative Agreement with MnIDOT for Signal Reimbursement
Expenses
DATE: August 16, 2007
The City of Maplewood wishes to enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of
Transportation (Mn/DOT), to share in the costs of the traffic signal system revisions and interconnect
construction to be performed on T.H. 61 at Beam Avenue
Background
City Project 06-17, Mogren Street Improvements, Beam Avenue to County Road D, includes signal
revisions at T.H. 61 and Beam Avenue. Mn/DOT Cooperative Agreement No. 91575 provides for
payments by the State of Minnesota to the City of Maplewood for the State's share of the construction
costs. Cost percentages are based on the percentage of intersection legs controlled by each roadway
authority. For this signal system, Mn/DOT is responsible for two legs (T.H. 61) resulting in 50% of the bid
price, and the City of Maplewood is responsible for the remaining 50% for Beam Avenue.
Z1 *6141 LY, I LY, 1:4 11 I BY-A 1 [01 Ll
It is recommended that the city council authorize the execution of Cooperative Agreement No. 91575 for
the reimbursement of expenses by the State for the traffic signal system revision and associated
construction in conjunction with City Project 06-17.
Attachment:s:
1. Resolution
2. Mn/DOT Memo dated June 29, 2007
3. MnIDOT Agreement No. 91575
RESOLUTION
IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter into Mn/DOT Agreement No. 91575 with the State of
Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes:
To provide for payment by the State to the City of Maplewood for the State's share of the costs of the traffic
control signal and interconnect construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along
and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 61 at Beam Avenue within the corporate City limits under State Project
No. 6222-159 (T.H. 61=001).
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute the
Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement.
0
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metro District
Waters Edge
1500 W. County Road 02
Roseville, MN 55113
Office Tel: 851-234-7818
Fax: 851-234-7850
E-mail: Linda. heath@dot.state.mn.us
June 29, 2007
Mr. Chuck Ahl
Public Works Director
City of Maplewood
|902 County Road BEast
Maplewood, MN 55109
Subject: S.P. 6222'159([Il.61), SAP 138'020'032, S&P 138-122'002
Traffic Control Signal Preliminary Cooperative Construction
Agreement Information
7.[l. 6l Ca,Beam Avenue
Dear Mr. /\bl:
The City o[ project for the construction of the traffic signal system ul the above
mentioned location was let oo May 2. 2007. Mn/DOT's programmed preservation funding for the
replacement u{ this traffic control signal isinState Fiscal Year 2O|l. In order io proceed with the
transfer of these funds |p the City iuState Fiscal Year 2011 the Department nfTransportation
needs concurrence from the City of Maplewood regarding the cost participation, powec
cuoiuiououceand operodmnrompouaibi|diomof the signal xy�cco. P1ouxcrcvicvvtbedesign, cos|
maintenance, power supply, operation, and funding information outlined below and respond on
behalf of your agency ze�ondiugcoznonibncottov/ordmthe various zeap000ihiUdeo.
Maintenance and Operation Responsibilities
Presently Mn/[x}T traffic signal agreement number 74]5Oimin place regarding this traffic signal
and will rema iu effect. This agreement covers ma operations, E\/9
street light and the cost of electrical power for the traffic signal. The costs cover construction
for the new traffic signal will be covered in the Municipal Cooperative Construction Agreement.
DESIGN FEATURES
The permanent traffic actuated signal system N}econstructed shall LED indications,
luminaires over the mainline signal poles, countdown pedestrian indications, mast arm and pole
signing, and appro iatopovcuzoo1znozkioga.Luopddoodooubo|lbciootaJlcdwiUzbznoonoeLullio
conduit.
SIGNAL SYSTEM AGREEMENT
Cost percentages are based ou the percentage o[ intersection legs controlled hveach roadway
authority. For this signal myskem Mu/DOTia responsible for two legs resulting iu50%of the bid
price and the City is responsible for the remaining 50%.
Bid Prices:
Signal "C"): $193,525.00
Total Construction Cost (not including State Furnished : $198
Traffic Control Signal MobUououcc Agreement Information
SP 6222-159 (TH 61 cu Beam Avenue)
June 29, 2007
Page 2
Mn/DOT's Share (50% of Bid Price): $99,26250
State furnished materials/labor shall be reimbursed by the participating agencies at the same rate as
the corresponding signal system. These items/costs will be included in the municipal agreement and
will be in addition to the contract pay item costs listed above. Estimated costs for known state
furnished items:
Cabinet/controller* = $28,500.
Mn/DOT's Share (50%) = $14,250.00
Construction Engineering and Inspection (8% of Mn/DOT's signal share): $9,081.00
Total Mn/DOT Participation (State Fiscal Year 2011 Reimbursement) = $122,593.50
*The City must obtain the cabinet and controller through the direct purchase process from
Mn/DOT. A purchase order (P.O.) must be issued by the City listing the vendor as the State of
Minnesota — Department of Transportation. The P.O. should be mailed to:
State of Minnesota — Department of Transportation
6000 Minnehaha Avenue
St. Paul, MN 551
Attn: James Deans, Electronic Maintenance Supervisor
The billing will be invoiced to the City of Maplewood. Please allow four weeks after receipt of
P.O. to receive the cabinet and controller.
Please respond in writing or by e-mail to this letter by July 22, 2007 so that we may continue with
the Municipal Agreement without delay.
If there are any questions or concerns with which I may be of assistance, please call or e-mail me.
Sincerely,
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Linda Heath
Metro District Signals Project Manager
CC: John Bieniek, MESU*
Robert Vasek, WE*
Wayne Lemaniak, WE*
Chris Roy, WE*
Marc Goess, WE*
Mary Lunceford, WE*
Steve Misgen, WE*
Pete Ellwanger, WE*
James Deans, CESU*
Lanette Zaiger, CO*
Maryanne Kelly-Sonnek, CO*
Allan Espinoza, WE*
Dick Pientka, CO*
Michael Gerbensky, WE*
Curt Krohn, WE*
District File C.S. 6222
* Electronic copy only (hard copies available upon request)
PRE-LETTING STATE OF MINNESOTA
SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECTION COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION
AGREEMENT
Mn/DOT
AGREEMENT NJ
91575
S.P. 6222-159 (T.H. 61=001)
S.A.P. 138-020-032
S.A.P. 138-122-002
C.P. 06-17
State Funds
The State of Minnesota
Department of Transportation, and
The City of Maplewood
Re: State cost traffic signal
system "C" construction by the City
on T.H. 61 at Beam Avenue
ORIGINAL I
AMOUNT ENCUMBEREM
122,593.50 (FY 2011
(None)
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the State of
Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as
the "State" and the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, acting by and
through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City".
1
91575
WHEREAS, the City is about to perform grading, aggregate base,
bituminous surfacing, concrete curb and gutter, concrete walk,
utilities, storm sewer and traffic signal improvements construction
and other associated construction upon, along and adjacent to Beam
Avenue (C.S.A.H. 19) from Trunk Highway No. 61/Maplewood Drive to the
BNSF Railroad bridge and on Beam Avenue (C.S.A.H. 19) from Trunk
Highway No. 61/Maplewood Drive to Duluth Street within the corporate
City limits in accordance with City-prepared plans, specifications
and special provisions designated by the City as City Project 06-17
and by the State as State Project No. 6222-159 (T.H. 61=001) and
S.A.P No's. 138-020-032, 138-122-002; and
WHEREAS, the City has requested participation by the State in the
costs of the traffic control signal system IICII and interconnect
construction; and
WHEREAS, the State is willing to participate in the costs of the
traffic control signal system IICII and interconnect construction which
includes the State's share for State Furnished Materials and
associated construction engineering in a lump sum amount as
hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, although the State is willing to pay the City, it can pay
only after funds for the traffic control signal system IICII and
interconnect construction have been encumbered, which encumbrance
must be preceded by the appropriation of such funds by the Minnesota
Legislature; and
WHEREAS, this construction is currently part of the State's 2011
fiscal year road construction program, and the State will seek the
appropriation of funds, and encumber the funds, if available; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes
the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and
2
91575
cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of
constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system.
ARTICLE I - CONSTRUCTION BY THE CITY
Section A. Contract Award and Construction
The City did receive bids and has awarded a construction contract to
the lowest responsible bidder in accordance with State-approved City
plans, specifications and special provisions designated by the City
as City Project No. 06-17 and by the State as State Project
No. 6222-159 (T.H. 61=001). Execution of this Agreement shall
constitute concurrence by the State in that award. The contract
construction shall be performed in accordance with State-approved
City plans, specifications and special provisions that are on file in
the office of the City's Engineer, and are incorporated into this
Agreement by reference.
Section B. Direction, Supervision and Inspection of Construction
The contract construction shall be under the direction of the City
and under the supervision of a registered professional engineer;
however, the State cost participation construction covered under this
Agreement shall be open to inspection by the State District
Engineer's authorized representatives.
Responsibility for the control of materials for the State cost
participation construction covered under this Agreement shall be on
the City and its contractor and shall be carried out in accordance
with Specifications No. 1601 through and including No. 1609 as set
forth in the State's current "Standard Specifications for
Construction".
Section C. Completion of Construction
The City shall cause the contract construction to be started and
completed in accordance with the time schedule in the construction
3
91575
contract special provisions. The completion date for the contract
construction may be extended, by an exchange of letters between the
appropriate City official and the State District Engineer's
authorized representative, for unavoidable delays encountered in the
performance thereof.
Section D. Additional Construction, Plan Changes, Etc.
The State shall not participate in the cost of any contract
construction that is in addition to the State cost participation
construction covered under this Agreement unless the necessary State
funds have been encumbered and the terms and conditions in the
following paragraph have been met.
All changes in the plans, specifications and special provisions for
the State cost participation construction covered under this
Agreement and all addenda, change orders and supplemental agreements
entered into by the City and its contractor for State cost
participation construction covered under this Agreement must be
approved in writing by the State District Engineer's authorized
representative before payment is made by the State therefor.
Section E. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances and
The City shall, in connection with the award and
the construction contract and the performance of
construction, comply and cause its contractor to
Federal, State and Local laws, and all applicable
regulations.
Regulations
administration of
the contract
comply with all
E� ordinances and
Section F. Construction Engineering Costs
The State shall pay a construction engineering charge in an amount
equal to 8 percent of the total cost of the State participation
construction covered under this Agreement.
I
91575
Section G. Addenda, Change Orders and Supplemental Agreements
The State shall share in the costs of construction contract addenda,
change orders and supplemental agreements that are necessary to
complete the State cost participation construction covered under this
Agreement and that have been approved in writing by the State
District Engineer's authorized representative.
ARTICLE II - PAYMENT BY THE STATE
The State shall pay to the City, as the State's full and complete
share of the costs of the traffic control signal system "C" and
interconnect construction, the State's share of state furnished
materials and associated construction engineering to be performed
upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 61 at Beam Avenue
within the corporate City limits under State Project No. 6222-159
(T.H. 61=001), a lump sum in the amount of $122,593.50.
After the following conditions have been met, the State shall pay to
the City the State's full and complete lump sum cost share:
1. Execution and approval of this Agreement and the State's
transmittal of it to the City.
2. Receipt by the State from the City of certified documentation for
all of the right-of-way and easement acquisition required for
State cost participation construction covered under this
Agreement.
3. Legislative appropriation of funds for the State's road
construction program. It is anticipated that payment by the
State that depends on Legislative appropriation of funds will be
made after July 1, 2010 and before June 30, 2011 for Fiscal
Year 2011.
4. Encumbrance by the State of the State's total estimated
construction cost share, the State's share of the state furnished
5
91575
materials and the 8 percent construction engineering cost share,
no earlier than July 1, 2010.
5. Receipt by the State of a written request from the City for the
payment of funds.
ARTICLE IV - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section A. Maintenance and operation of signal system
Upon completion of the traffic signal system "C", interconnect and
EVP construction to be performed within the corporate City limits
under the construction contract, the existing signal operation and
maintenance agreement No. 74350 dated March 28, 1996 between the
State, City and Ramsey County shall remain in full force and effect.
Section B. Termination of Agreement
Each party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by
providing the other party with written or fax notice of effective
date of termination. The State is not obligated to pay for services
performed after notice and effective date of termination. Upon such
termination, the City is entitled to payment for services
satisfactorily performed under this Agreement prior to the effective
date of termination.
The State may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not
obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding
source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to
allow for the payment of the services covered under this Agreement.
Termination must be by written or fax notice to the City. The State
is not obligated to pay for services performed after notice and
effective date of termination. Upon such termination, the City is
entitled to payment for services satisfactorily performed under this
Agreement prior to the effective date of termination, to the extent
the funds are available.
6
91575
Section C. Examination of Books, Records, Etc.
As provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 160.05, subdivision 5, the
books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of
each party relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by
each party, and either the legislative auditor or the state auditor
as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from final payment.
Section D. Claims
Each party is responsible for its own employees for any claims
arising under the Workers Compensation Act. Each party is
responsible for its own acts, omissions and the results thereof to
the extent authorized by law and will not be responsible for the acts
and omissions of others and the results thereof. Minnesota Statutes
Section 3.736 and other applicable law govern liability of the State.
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and other applicable law govern
liability of the City.
Section E. Nondiscrimination
The provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 181.59 and of any
applicable law relating to civil rights and discrimination shall be
considered part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein.
Section F. Agreement Approval
Before this Agreement becomes binding and effective, it shall be
approved by a City Council resolution and executed by such State and
City officers as the law may provide in addition to the Commissioner
of Transportation or their authorized representative.
ARTICLE V - AUTHORIZED AGENTS
The State's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of
this Agreement is Maryanne Kelly-Sonnek, Municipal Agreements
Engineer, or her successor. Her current address and phone number are
395 John Ireland Boulevard, Mailstop 682, St. Paul, MN 55155,
(651) 366-4634.
7
91575
The City's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of
this Agreement is Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director, or their
successor. Their current address and phone number are 1902 County
Road B East, Maplewood, MN 55109, (651) 249-2402.
8
91575
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement by their
authorized officers.
STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered Recommended for approval:
as required by Minn. Stat. 55 36A.15 and 16C. 05.
By
By District Engineer
Approved:
Date
By
State Design Engineer
MAPS Encumbrance No.
By
Mayor
Date
By
Title
Date
Date
Approved as to form and execution:
By
Contract Management
Date
COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
As delegated to materials Management Division
By
Date
9
Agenda Item 18
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahi Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Bill Priefe[ Public Works Operations Analyst
SUBJECT: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MnReLeaf Grant for
Oak Wilt Disease Control
DATE: August 17
The City of Maplewood has received a Minnesota ReLeaf grant in the amount of $1O,UO0 for the grant
period Of July 1.2OO7 through June 30,2OO8. The K8DR9L8of grant provides matching funds 0n8
reimbursement basis for a comprehensive disease management program for oak wilt within defined control
zones within Maplewood. The Department of Natural Resource's goal for the program is to maintain oaks
8s|n integral part of community resources and io minimize the impact [f oak wilt.
Background
The MnReLeaf grant provides reimbursement to citizens and the city for oak wilt control efforts including
vibratory plowing and the removal of diseased spore producing oak trees. Chemical injections, hOvv8v8[.
are not reimbursable this year GS they were last year. The City received our first K4nR8LeGf grant last year
for the period 0f July 1.20O8 through June 30.20OYin the amount [f $7 [)f that amount, $4.00Uwas
reimbursed to eleven property owners, and $3,800 was reimbursed to the city for control work and removal
of diseased oaks 8t open space sites.
Through outreach and education, we attempted to identify and notify property owners of diseased oaks in
order to encourage their participation in the management of oak wilt through matching grant money. The
participation level was lower than vveexpected. However, individual land owners have different values and
economic circumstances that sometimes preclude the appropriate actions L0 contain oak wilt. We hope
that through the combination of financial assistance and continued outreach and education that more
property owners will participate in isolating this disease and take advantage of the financial assistance
afforded by this grant.
No action is required by the council. This is information only.
Agenda Item 19
To: Maplewood City Council
From: Greg Copeland, City Manager
Date: August 22, 2007
Re: Temp-Seasonal-Casual Part-time Pay Ranges for 2007
a=. �
The City of Maplewood periodically updates the guidelines for pay ranges for
part-time, non-benefit earning employees. The pay ranges were last updated in
December of 2005. Supervisors have the ability to hire within the range, based
on a person's experience, qualifications, etc.
Recommendation:
I recommend that the City Council approve the attached resolution that sets
guidelines for pay ranges for these part-time non-benefit earning employees.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, according to the Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations act, part -time employees
who do not work more than 14 hour per week and temporary /seasonal employees who work in positions that
do not exceed 67 days in a calendar year, or 100 days for full -time students, are not public employees and are
therefore not eligible for membership in a public employee union.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following pay ranges and job classifications are
hereby established for temporary /seasonal and casual part-time (14 hours or fewer /wk) employees effective
upon approval.
Accountant
$10.00 -30.00
per hour
Accounting Technician
$9.00 -22.00
per hour
Administrative Assistant
$9.00 -23.00
per hour
Background Investigator
$25.00 -35.00
per hour
Building Inspector
$14.00 -35.00
per hour
Building Attendant
$6.15 -15.00
per hour
Clerk
$7.50 -15.00
per hour
Customer Service Assistant
$6.15 -15.00
per hour
CSO
$8.00 -16.00
per hour
Data Entry Operator
$8.00 -12.00
per hour
Election Judge
$6.50 -12.00
per hour
Election Judge - Assistant Chair
$9.00 -15.00
per hour
Election Precinct Chair
$9.00 -16.00
per hour
Engineering Aide
$7.00 -16.00
per hour
Engineering Technician
$10.00 -16.00
per hour
Fire Department Custodian
$600 -690
per quarter
Firefighter -Paid- Per -Cali
$8.74 -15.31
per run
$18.00
per drill
Firefighter -Paid- Per -Call - Shift Fill -in
$12.00
per hour
Intern
$6.50 -20.00
per hour
IT Technician
$15.00 -20.00
per hour
Laborer
$6.50 -14.00
per hour
Lifeguard
$6.15 -14.00
per hour
Manager on Duty Differential
$1.00
per hour
Office Specialist
$8.50 -18.00
per hour
Receptionist
$8.00 -16.00
per hour
Recreation Instructor /Leader
$615 -32.00
per hour
Recreation Official
$6.15 -30.00
per hour
Recreation Worker
$6.15 -18.00
per hour
Theater Technician
$20.00 -30.00
per hour
Vehicle Technician
$9.00 -15.00
per hour
Video Coordinator*
$11.00 -19.00
per hour
Video Technician*
$10.00 -18.00
per hour
Water Safety Instructor (WSI)
$7.50 -16.00
per hour
WSI & Head Lifeguard Differential
$1.00
per hour
(Lifeguards or WSIs working as Head
Lifeguards; Lifeguards working as WSIs)
*Video positions shall be paid a guaranteed minimum flat fee of $50 for 4 hours or less.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager shall have the authority to set the pay rate
within the above ranges.
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Michael Thompson, Civil Engineer 11
SUBJECT: Pond Overlook Public Improvements (2161 County Rd D), Project 07-08
1. Approve Resolution for Awarding Construction Contract
DATE: August 23, 2007
INTRODUCTION
Final plans and specifications for the Pond Overlook Public Improvements were approved by the city
council on July 23 2007, and authorization was given to advertise for bids. Those bids were received and
subsequently opened on Wednesday August 22
Background
Contractor bids were received and publicly read aloud at 10:30 a.m., on Wednesday, August 22 2007.
The following five bids were received:
All bids have been checked and tabulated. The engineer's estimate for the project was $140,020.00. The
low bid from Northdale Construction of $107,606.75 is about 23% less than the engineer's construction
cost estimate. The city has worked successfully with Northdale Construction, Inc. in the past, most recently
on the Cottagewood Public Improvements (Highwood Avenue).
Budget Impact
There would be no impact to the approved budget based on the above recommendation. The bid falls well
within the approved construction cost estimate and similarly falls within the estimated construction costs
established in the feasibility study. Furthermore the developer of the townhomes to front the new public
street has posted a letter of credit in the amount of 125% of the total project costs. The letter of credit can
be considered for released once the developer property has been successfully assessed.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached Resolution for the Award of Bids for Pond
Overlook Public Improvements (2161 County Road D), City Project 07-08.
Attachments:
1. Resolution: Award of Bids
2. Location Map
3. Final Bid Tabulation Letter
Contractor
Total Bid
1)
Northdale Construction
$107,606.75
2)
Burschville Construction, Inc
$111,888.00
3)
Jay Bros, Inc.
$112,689.55
4)
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc.
$117,352.50
5)
Hennen Construction
$117,845.00
6)
Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc.
$124,917.50
7)
Geislinger & Sons
$126,467.05
8)
Northwest Asphalt
$127,035.32
All bids have been checked and tabulated. The engineer's estimate for the project was $140,020.00. The
low bid from Northdale Construction of $107,606.75 is about 23% less than the engineer's construction
cost estimate. The city has worked successfully with Northdale Construction, Inc. in the past, most recently
on the Cottagewood Public Improvements (Highwood Avenue).
Budget Impact
There would be no impact to the approved budget based on the above recommendation. The bid falls well
within the approved construction cost estimate and similarly falls within the estimated construction costs
established in the feasibility study. Furthermore the developer of the townhomes to front the new public
street has posted a letter of credit in the amount of 125% of the total project costs. The letter of credit can
be considered for released once the developer property has been successfully assessed.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached Resolution for the Award of Bids for Pond
Overlook Public Improvements (2161 County Road D), City Project 07-08.
Attachments:
1. Resolution: Award of Bids
2. Location Map
3. Final Bid Tabulation Letter
RESOLUTION
AWARD OF BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Northdale
Construction in the amount of $107,606.75 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Pond Overlook Public
Improvements (2161 County Road D) —City Project 07-08, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city.
The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing
plan for the project.
Adopted by the council on this 27 day of August 2007.
EXHIBIT I
iii
Heijt�ts Park
Playc rest
Park
11
N
August 23, 2007
City of Maplewood
|8]0E. Co. Rd. l\
Maplewood, MN 55109
TlB: Maplewood, Minnesota
Pond Overlook Public
Citv Pro ioct No. O7-U8xCliczdNmx
On Wednesday, August 22 bids were received for the jcuL
Please find enclosed the bid tabulation detailing the results. The results are summarized below.
Contractor Total Bid
1
Northdale Construction
$107,606.75
2
Burschville Construction, Inc,
$111,888.00
3
Jay Bros. Inc.
$112,689.55
5
Herman Construction
$117,845.00
6
Dave Perkins Cosntruction, Inc.
$124,917.50
8
Northwest Asphalt
$127,035.32
Engineer's Estimate $140,020.00
* Denotes mnectedfigure
The low bid was submitted by Northdale Construction o{ Rogers, Minnesota, in the amount of
$107 investigated the qualifications ofy4ordxloo Construction and find that they (l)
have a sufficient understanding oithe project and equipment to perform the construction for which kbid;
and (2) according to their bonding agent they presently have the financial ability to complete the project
bid. SEH makes no representation or warranty as to the actual financial viability of the contractor or its
ability to complete its work.
Accordingly we recommend the project bc awarded kmNordhdub Construction io the amount nf
$107,600.75.
Chad E. Setterholm, PE
Project Manager
Enclosure
nb
Short Elliott Hendrickson /mc..zsusvaunais Center Drive, st. Paul, Mwe11us1oa
oenisun equal opportunity employer | www.s»mnozom 1 651.490.2000 1 800.325.2055 1 651.490.2150um
L6
0
Z
0
P
4c
A
i
monompl=
mKlqK E-ml
W
0)
co
CL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
V
9
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
9
9
U)
9
9
U?
q
U?
9
q
q
9
9
q
9
9
9
9
q
9
9
q
q
9
0
0
C)
C>
C)
0
C)
C)
LO
co
r-
C)
0
0
CD
C,
C)
0
C)
c�
co
t,-
u-,
C,
<D
0
C)
0
C,
co
0
M
0
C�
C)
- t
C)
N
V
0
C:)
C)
CO
LO
CO
00
r-
U)
N
N
—
CO
C)
00
<t"
M
Lo
N
N
CO
N
o
CO
C)
00
LO
1
, T
LO
N
—
N
CO
0
N
(0
LO
CD
C)
C)
0
U)
C)
C)
C)
[I-
(D
CO
Z�
Cl)
0
LO
(Fj
(6
.1 i
N
r_:
t_•
C\i
rl.:
1-:
In w Lo
c z LO
0
Z O
0
C�
CD
C)
C)
C)
C)
a
0
CD
V)
C)
m
C)
C)
LO
0
C5
ED
(5
o
C)
E)
a
o
C)
C5
C)
o
C)
7777
dy :5; C)
c c�:)
( U : �)
c c�>
O
Q
U)
Lf�
N
M
Cl?
o
N
O
q
O
O
o
0
0
0
d
0
C?
0
1: o6
�t
0
C�
(1)
;:
�o
-,t
Lf)
(.0
N
00
cq
0
C)
C>
00
LO
't
0
M
U,)
L
C5 (3) 00
O
to
Q0
LO
C14
(�o
CD
f-
—
LO
—
c
m
CD
C) >
0
cli
co
I-
:T
, t C:
C
Gq
4)
0
CD
0
V)
cc
CD
ID
0
C,
CD
CD
0
in
CD
(D
r-
r_
CD
CD
U')
It
CD
CD
CD
CD
(D
ID
0
0
(D
V')
N
I ?
q
O R
I:
I D
L o
00
M
<D
u-,
0 �
0 ?
C R
N
d
fl-
to
m
C5
C5
m
w
m
N
N
in
U
6
6
4
6
6
Q0
m
N
m
m
C
.
co
.
m
.
U
N
0
m
U -)
CD
m
m
0
m
N
!�!
N
—
U.)
-
m
<D
0
1-
It
�;
I
m
m
m
LC)
cli
N
It
C)
M
N
M
'It
4
q
I'-
C �
oc�
P
IQ
M
m
m
LQ
CO
N
co
L6
GO
1-:
di
C
CD
r-:
U')
M
—
N
CO
CO
2
( D
0
-C
0 all Lo
U')
z
(D
0
LO
U
U)
C)
r-
0
CO
Q
�
a)
f-
U -)
<D
CD
U")
CO
1 0
CO
( �O
m
T
N
CD
"-
m
rl �
C:)
0 �
V)
.
00
.
"
0 �
(N
0 )
C�
cl�
C�
Lr �
:
—
(,�
U�
11
.
Co
O�
r`
(P
0 (0
- FD z CD
•
N
C>
N
0
Q
Nt
CO
—
i
4
Cl)
1--
:1-
CO
a)
U-)
N
o
4
N
U*)
—
co
I-
C5
—
U
Cl)
06
C
t--
Cq
—
C\J
m
—
C)
00
-t
CO
m
V)
CO
't
a
LO
t
�2
CO
CD
C;)
in
0 o O
Go
Z �
0
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
C)
0
C)
CD
CD
C)
(D
CD
CD
0
CD
CD
C)
CD
CD
CD
C)
0
C)
CD
CD
CD
(D
CD
(D
C)
(D
U)
Q
q
I ?
q
I ?
C?
I ?
q
q
q
q
q
U?
C?
C?
q
q
q
I ?
q
I ?
C?
I?
O
q
q
I ?
q
q
—
—
00
0
C.
o
(D
CD
C)
C>
<D
0
d
U
C\l
�
C)
C>
C)
0
CD
o
(.0
0
M
C)
<D
0
C)
C
C)
o.
0
N
:t
0
00
c>
LO
0
0)
N
CD
co
(D
t--
;:
co
C)
0
C)
0
q
V)
N
V)
C)
0
q
C)
CD
Cl)
M
—
C
oc�
--
—
CO
cq
m
tl•
oc�
I
Cl
M
cl�
CD
Cl)
tl-
Q
10
rl.:
C�
M
LO
It
m
(D -
GO
00
CO
rt
to
CO
—
—
—
—
E
o
LU <D
(D
0
Q
U
CD
0
C)
C)
a
0
C)
0
CD
0
o
C)
LO
0
CD
CD
C)
C)
C)
(D
0
C)
0
CD
CD
CD
CD
<D
cn C)
C:)
Q
M
Q
q
I?
o
O
0
C)
d
o
Lq
q
q
N
O
C?
O
Q
Cl
Q
I?
O
O
Q
q
o
O
O
C.
O
C)
�t
cl)
0
0
0
LO
LO
'-
N
C)
LO
O
U
C
C)
6
N
6
C5
0
�t
o
U
U
C)
o
c.
C>
C5
N
o
�2
cy)
It
CO
U
C)
CD
—
0
M
Cl)
cn
CO
C V
cq
1-
0
CO
CD
N
CD
"o
C�
Cl i
—
—
Go
w
CO
C)
a
0
CD
Q
C,
0
m
U
<D
CO
CD
�D
Il-
LO
C�
CD
0
C�
CD
00
CD
a)
�t
I-
N
(0
m
N
LO
m
C)
N
CO
M
C)
I-
N
LO
tl,.
CO
m
C\l
m
t
UJ
Ci
z
z
z
0
LL
LL
LL
0
0
>-
>-
LL
>-
LL
0
0
<
<
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
<
<
7
F
I C)
I U)
1 -1
1 0)
-1
I F
H
0
1 0
I W
W
-i
LLJ
-i
-j
-i
-i
-i
-i
W
LLJ
LIJ
LU
CO
LLJ
0
Z
CL
Z
LU
W
CL
W
CL
w
0
0
CL
CL
E
-J
5;
0
a.
w
w
<
w
0
F-
w
a-
w
CL
0�
w
D
o
Lu
0
0
U)
o
E
w
LL
0
z
y
>
w
w
ob
F-
W
W
C)
X
0
F-
F-
W
<
J
0
D
0
z
W
m
0
z
<
-j
<
LU
CL
m
(L
W D
>
<
0
w
c
(D
0
0
rr
o
co
'o
w
Y
O
W
W
c
W
CL
z
w
w
w
0
o
F-
w
w
U)
<
0
FC�-
Z
C)
W
0
LL
<
W
W
0
0
W
F-
CO
Lu
a
x
N
Z
0
o
0
>-
F-
o
z
0
C
a.
0
x
0
cli
<
0
0
0
F-
CD
F-
o z
>
0
E
<
Z n
ar
U)
2
2
C)
0
"
0
I
C
(D
W
0
<
<
(D
<
w
t
W
w
W
F-
W
C , )
Q
Z
P
F-
0
W
F-
u
2
z
w
w
0 ,
3:
0
-j
D
(f)
(0
-,
0
z
0
o
Lu
w
z
w
w
co
E
z
z
§ �
0
>-
<
75;
0
111
0
111
<
>
Z
0
z
<
>
0
w
m
0
<
o
<
<
w
CL
0
0
W
tr
F-
0
0
<
I- ,,: <
0
z
z
0
w
x
i
z
I,
W
co
0
w
z
5
fr
w
z
- r
<
LU
�z
<
CL
CL CD
0
z
D
w
Lil
C)
<
w
z
0
w
cL
a,
a.
:�!
C)
LU
0
(D
U)
0
>
D
00
0
F-
Ir
w
W
Of
-j
:5;
3:
z
- 1
<
<
w
(n
z
3:
D
Z:)
Lu
F-
C�
cr
LU
F-
-j
<
Cf)
2= 40
to
C
co
0
w
CL
-1
co
m
0
0
C)
<
LIJ
0�
of
W
0
C)
U)
>
z
UJ
.2 0
N
LLJ
0
0
<
F-
X
LLI
>i
>
z
Lu
CL
Lu
(L
LL
>
U)
U)
w
fy
M
Q-
co
LU
n
73 w CL (D
,
>
0
z
z
w
Ir
fr
w
W
0
E
-j
��
r)
m
a.
o
o
0
c
m
m
x
0
m a
—
CO
w
w
(D
W
F-
LU
LLI
-
z
-r
0
CL
0
0
w
D
Q
M
C
5;
1
Of
m
-j
0
�
_j
CL
0-
<
=
CL
(
a
= 0
n
0
0
0
d
o
m
Q 'S
5
W
ry
cn
<
co
D
U)
(D
LLJ
(j)
LU
0
w
n
LL
I
1�
P
1 0
=
q
=
I CO
04
—
LO
—
1 Cl)
—
—
—
—
O
O
0
6
> 0
0 R. 6 B
z
Z M
2
E
IN
CL
4)
0 M Ri
CD
N
M
;t
L2
CD
t-
M
d
C)
N
M
Et
m
CO
I-
co
m
CD
N
o. m co
—
IN
co
1,r
ILO
CO J
jr-
I00
0)
1—
1—
—
1
C14
N
N
N
IN
N
N
N
N
m
M
Cl)
W
0)
co
CL
m
L6
O
O
a
M J
W
I
i
o
0
0
d
O
o
d
0
0
0
0
d
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
d
O
o
0
X
Lq
0
0
o
a
d
o
d
a
0
d
o
a
d
o
d
a
d
O
o
a
o
L
a
0
C.
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ui
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Lo
0
co
a co
a
LO
CO
d
U)
d
d
Lo
r
o
N
Up
0)
O
M
Lo
00
Ln
m
N
St
o
N
m
CO
Ln
o
o
U)
0
O
LC)
'It
LC)
N
d
M
00
M
r`
r
0
N
00
00
N
N
O
N
M
r
c W Lo
Z LO
O
Vt
O
U C� Z o
O
O
O
O
a
0
0
a
0
0
0
d
m
0
0
d
O
0
0
d
a
v � O
Ln
o
0
0
a
o
Cl
0
0
0
o
U?
m
o
o
d
Ln
o
0
0
a
- 00
v
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ui
0
Ui
0
0)
0
C>
0
N
0
0
LO
0
> W 00
d
O
O
U)
O
M
O
N
M
d
O
O
M
O
O
.G d > M
U1
d
N
d
M
rt
CO
t17
O
N
r
N
L d 0
p
N
N
N
m
: CII
=
d�
O
d
O
a
0
0
7
C0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LO
0
0
U)
C
a
to
C1
Ln
o
0
U7
a
U)
a
0
Ln
U')
d
C)
CO
O
a
t,
a
d
o
U7
O
+. >.?
i
co
O
O
M
(.0
Cl)
00
U)
co
t`
O
d
co
O
O
Cl)
LO
Lo
U)
ti
m
to
O
d
U7
d
LO
a)
m
m
O
LO
M
tom-
LO
N
r
LO
U)
6)
m
N
d
U)
m
9z
_ >
r
U)
N
O
00
t�
O
0)
m
St
N
M
tl-
m
M
N
N
(0
N
CO
SO
m
r
N
LO
N
m
t+�'
i
O'
LO
;
O - U) U)
m
0
0
0
a
0
0
N
M
O
O
Lo
M
o
o
d
LO
O
m
d
a
ti
U
r
d
0
U7
a
LO
O
U)
L()
LO
tO
0
U) U)
m
d
M
U7
a
a) O t.0
Z
N O
y _
d
( .O
O
O
O
LO
M
m
C0
co
CO
d
(0
co
r-
tom-
CO
CO
00
d
N
O
to
O
U)
M
N
U*)
t`
O
ti
U)
Ch
CO
-O d i O
Lr)
N
m
M
t�
M
rt
co
t`
O
N
(0
0) )
�''
C
N
r
r
r
r
N
M
z C� fR
0
0
d
O
o
d
0
0
0
0
d
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
d
O
o
0
C1
Ln
d
O
O
o
a
d
d
o
O
d
o
a
d
d
U)
a
d
O
0
a
o
L
00000000Ul)
00000N00U;000
d
M
d
d
d
LO
d
U)
d
LO
N
h-
00
a
d
o
LO
CO
d
d
0
N
_
C0
t-
M
O
ti
LO
I`
d'
O
00
to
N
M
m
CO
Imo-
Lt)
Lo
O
N
N
t`
M
O
m
O
E
H
W d
o
0
d
O
o
d
0
0
0
0
o
d
d
O
0
d
o
0
0
0
0
(n O
U
LO
o
0
0
a
0
0
d
0
0
U)
O
O
a
0
d
LO
0
0
0
0
o
C i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ui
M
a)
U)
0
0
LO
cl)
o
ri
0
0
N N
d
O
U)
O
L()
lO
U)
M
r
O
O
N
0
0
O a
C)
I -D
I`-
t7J
0
r
-
tf)
N
N
Lo
rt
c
to
N
N
U)
-
U)
m
W EA
0)
r
r
r
r
r
Cl)
N
r
U)
O
d
d
r
r
U7
a
CO
LO
r
r
yy,,
Z
W
r
c
N
N
N
LO
N
O
Cl)
�
�
W
9 ,.?
W
=
=
rY1
Q
a
Q
Q
<<
<t
Q
Q
J
>-
LL
LL
W<
LL
LL
Q
J
W
W
W
W
IUI
W
t1)
W
U
U)
J
J
J
W
(n
J
W
U)
Q
W
0
v
Cl)
G
t
Imo-
W
cn
z
U
}
U)
O
CL
O
°
H
W
z
LO
W
Q
°
O
_
3
ry
W
o
CD
U)
N
E-
Z
a
M
Q
z
w
of
Q
7;
x
(n
w
U
Z
O
z
w
O
3:
N
@
Q
Q
LU
m
d¢
><
>
( ( 0
Q
U
O�
o
w
Q
Q
X°
o�>
°'
°
°
Q
H
0
U)
_°
00
d
m
ui
W
Z
Z
z
-j
m
0
N
U
N
U)
d
m
U)
>-
U
C.`J
W
J
z
z
a
a
Q
cc
Q
W
W
ZO
w
m
z
Q
c N
Z
a
U
N
U)
U)
H
E-
H
co
m
Q
J
Q
U)
J
O
LL
W
W
co
co
O
Q<
F-
Y-
�'
z
�'
C
Q
U
U
W
W
cO
06
>
W
Z }
a
d
CL o
p
0
0
I-
1-
I-
<�
((n
W
U
U
Z
O
W
J
z
Q
<{
z
W
LLI
O
v + W
W
U
U
Q
Q
W
<C
O
O
X
W
W
O
O
z
Z°(D
p J to
J
W
W
h
I-
H
Z
Z
Z_
O
W
m
x
U
d
W
Z
H
4) Q C
�-
Z
Z
W
U)
U)
F-
H°
H
U
U
LL
v
U-
of
°
0r
J
CL >_ 'O
U
z
z
z
z
z
LLJ
U)
U)
Z
O
Z
Z
Q
U
Z
H
O°°
I-
__ m
D
O
O
O
O
O�
Q
Q
<(
w
O
O
ry
O(D
J
�-
O>
o g <C 'S
°
U
U
U
U
U
z
U
C)
�
cD
U
U
I—
�
CO
U
U)
U)
=
O
O
°'
z
m
O R. d
d z o
E
a
a)
p t4 W
m
q
U)
(0
h
W
M
O
N
M
It
M
CO
h
M
O
O
N
m
O
m 0 m
m
m
m
m
m
m
mKf
v
v
v�T
v
d
It
v
v
Lo
to
U)
I Lo
I-
v
a
ns
CL
L6
0
z
O
t
0
co
CL
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
�nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
cli
E
0
CL
CL
0
>
0
0
0. co m
co
CL
L6
0
z
0
P
4c
A
i
monompl=
mKIqK E-ml
co
CL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LO
-T
0
0
0
0
0
LO
0
0
0
LO
0
-t
0
0
0
0
LO
LO
Lo
o -4
M
0
C!
M
cc
CD
C
C�
"It
10
U
N
U')
m
It
1—
It
m
r—
CD
w
0
:3 Cl)
-tz LO
1.0)
(1) U) Lo
0
O
O
C)
0
C)
C>
C)
0
CD
O
C)
0
CD
C>
C)
0
O
O
CD
c z C)
0 . 9
C) 2i
0
0
0
q
O
o
Un
o
o
O
o
n
C ?
C?
o
O
LO
: It
LO
C)
C)
C>
CD
C)
C)
0
0
CD
CD
0
LO
C)
CD
0
CD
C)
O
N
LO
N
N
CD
CD
C>
C)
N
CY)
r
CD
O
CD
LO
0
0
C) 00
cl
0
C7)
cc�
4=1
m
LO
d'
U')
m
r-
CD
N r,:
LO
LO
cq
V5
(3) 0
0,
0
C)
C)
C)
CD
(D
CD
C)
0
C)
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
0
C)
CD
C)
CD
0
0
9
q
q
9
q
C?
9
9
C?
q
q
9
q
C?
q
U ?
C?
C?
q
q
q
M)
.,
C)
C>
C)
0
0
0
C)
0
U*)
C)
<D
0
C)
0
C\l
0
C)
'IT
C)
0
C*4
CCA
-t
C)
C�
0
V)
LO
N
(D
N-
I--
-
00
-t
C)
C)
�;
0
00
c�
0
0
in
Ul O
(7)
t
t'
l f )
m
m
C �
N
N
c
-
co
C'�
N
LO
Cl)
Iq
LO
It
LO
la
V)
0 LI)
N
-
-
-
-
-
(0
-
C
r-:
C0 Lo
0
Z
Lo
0
O
O
(D
0
C)
CD
CD
C!
0
C?
CD
0
O
0
CD
0
0
0
C)
CD
(D
C!
0
0
CD
0
(D
'F I- = .
cU C
LO
C)
C>
C)
0
C;
0
C)
0
U")
r-
m
N
C)
O
m
m
C)
(0
C)
a
W LO
C)
CD
I-
C)
U')
m
m
m
G)
mot'
CY)
00
Cl)
t-
N
m
CD
cq
CD
Lo
M
Co
C)
V
0
10
W Cl)
St
c) r-:
N
C
Cl)
0
C)
C)
C)
CD
CD
CD
C)
0
C)
CD
C)
CD
CD
CD
CD
0
CD
CD
C)
CD
LO
i
t-
C)
C>
LL)
0
Lo
O
C)
LO
C)
C)
LO
V
O
0
Lo
0
C)
U)
Lo
N
m
N
d
C.0
c)
O
0
m
f-
O
q
m
O
O
N
N
CD
C)
N
0
C)
- q
C)
m
w
O
LO
M
LO
cl�
CO
-
M
(0
N
M
-
M
U')
C�
It
M
M
CO
N
M
<0
LO
LO
N
ti
N
cl�
V5
tq
z
0
0 LO
CD
CD
CD
0
CD
0
CD
0
CD
0
co
0
CD
CD
C)
0
C)
CD
C-)
CD
C) Se LL?
0
C ?
q
q
q
q
q
C ?
C ?
C ?
C4
r�
q
q
-
-.
q
0
q
q
t- m a)
V
cl)
C)
C>
LO
0
LO
0
CD
LO
C)
U')
CO
CO
CD
C>
r
LO
C)
r-
V)
N
2
CD
CD
C)
m
CD
N
m
CO
CD
CD
M
C)
C)
co
o x (m
q
ca co
0)
LO
M
cc�
CIJ
co
co
C
U
C�
Cl)
C�
Cl)
0
LL
M
N
LO
0
CD
0
LO
0
M
LO
CO
N
N
N
N
co
W
CD
0
rY1
<
<
Q
Q
<
<
>-
LL
LL
U1
<
LL
L - L i
<
1-i
W
IW
IW
ILU
IUJ
W
IW
JW
0
U)
J
I J
W
CO
w
IU)
R
I UJ
cn
<
ci
LU
<
w
CO
LU
Z
U)
<
(0
CL
U)
z
7->
CD
0
z
LO
—
<
0
0
>
ry
Lu
C?
0
(D
LLJ
z
<
U)
C14
N
<
<
Z
-
0
CD
E
0
j;
K
CD
Q
0
>-
of
<
75
x
<
(n
—
z
0
CD
3:
z
z
LU
x
<
Of
LU
0
M
"
Z
>
(0
"Cr
<
0
-
Q n
0
<
in
o
r-
(0
CO
fl-
>
1
co
.
0
o
w
0
LU
<
Q
CD
w
<
u)
�:
x
CO
=
00
CD
�2
-
Lli
M
Z
Z
z
-j
co
0
N
-
w
-,
r)
C ?
,
M
W
>-
W
7
cli
(D
Z
z
w
W
LU
<
cc
<
F
W
z
w
m
z
Z
m
a,
Lu
1
LLI
Lu
0
(0
<
P
F
0
<
W
-J
-i
(0
-1
0)
> CD
-
LL
x
x
<
<
CL
w W
Z
w
0
2
z
LLJ
LU
Z
W
W
LL
>.
CL
Z
CL
�:
CL CD
0
0
<
5
0
ct)
w
(/)
w
z
F-
WZ
<
U)
40 m
<
<
-j
w
w
CO)
L-LJJ
Ld
Q
X
o
UJ
W
of
0
C":
<
P:
F-
w
w
0
0
z
Z
0
D
()
0 -J
CL
w
w
F-
F-
Z
Z
Z
0
x
M
X
i
( -)
<
(L
W
5
z
<
w
w
4)
z
z
w
w
w
Elf
iz
�z
o
0
0
LL
v
U-
Of
F)
Or
-i
CL s=
U
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
W
0
0
Z
0
Z
Z
<
0
Z
F-
O°°
0
0
0
0
0
Q<
<
w
0
0
ry
O_0
--
o
>-
D
U
ry
o
3
u
H cr-
w
w
w
w=
0
0
0
> 0
0
z
co
0 o
Z
-0 a
E
4)
9
o m w
co
q
U')
(0
P-
M
M
CD
-
N
M
't
M
CO
I-
M
M
CD
N
M
0
m 2 0 m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
Kf
�t
, I -
Nt
�
lzt
d
It
v
v
LO
n
U)
LO
co
CL
L6
0
Z
0
P
4c
A
i
monompl=
mKIqK E-ml
co
CL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(7)
0
N
0
0
0
0
�f
M
LO
U
0
0
N
LO
0
M
M
N
CO
M
0
N
N
M
N
Qa
00
M
CO
I
c
C')
-
N
CO
C�
(C�
P-
Lf)
I'l
CO
-
t'�
-
C)
CO
CO
CO
'-Ij
V�
LQ
t
t-:
1-
04
1 ;1:
CO
Cl)
C')
Lo
0')
(Fj
N
0
-
CO
P
00
P-
Lo
-
N
(o
CO
cq
CO
J- LO
0
Q- z
0
C�
0
(D
a
C)
0
L
m
C)
Q
C)
0
C)
C)
(D
0
C)
Q
0
'IT
Co
a
m
CO
N
N
0
C)
C)
(D
Cj
c?
O
0
0 .
0
0 .
.
U �
`q
o
0
0
C�
0
, I:
C?
(A
o
C?
lz�
0
0
L o
C:)
0
cl)
0
C�
W
LO
U)
N
M
LO
C>
M
t
U.)
U.)
C6
(N
d'
d"
r
LO
-
"t
N
(.0
00
C>
CO
Cl)
O
to
N
LO
tl-
I-
N
M
Cl)
M
CO
-
CO
C\j
N
N
N
-
rl-
N
t
N
CO
(o
o
M
0 -r-
z Cl)
0
CD
CD
C)
CD
(D
CD
C)
0
C)
CD
CD
0
(D
CD
(D
0
CD
CD
C)
CD
CD
CD
C)
0
(D
CD
C)
CD
(D
d
C)
9
q
C
9
q
(?
q
C?
0 o
q
q
q
q
(?
q
9
C?
(?
q
q
0
C
9
1 ?
q
I ?
q
q
q
q
q
q
-
-
C.
C)
0
0
o
U)
C)
C)
C)
CD
0
LO
0
C)
0
C)
C>
C)
0
C)
0
It
Q0
LO
C)
a
0
C)
0
C)
6
d
0
N
Lo
N
0
NT
C)
LO
N
I
-, t
r
0
f'-
C)
Lr)
-T
Lo
co
0
0
P-
C)
(D
I-
M
LO
0
(D
"T
C)
c�
co
V
0)
cq
I
LO
LO
(
CO
Cl)
-
LO
-
00
LO
CO
(3)
LO
(0
-
CO
CO
m
It
<r
CO
CO
m
(6 00
LO
GG
C6
C\i
-
C\i
(6
tl--:
00
C(5
N
6
t--:
C: (1) Cl)
0 > Lo
0
cn ¢ Lo
C)
Q
(D
0
C)
C)
a
N
C)
C�
C)
0
C)
C)
(D
0
CD
CD
(D
0
C)
C)
C)
0
C)
0
C)
CD
C)
Z Lo
C:)
2)
5
5
C)
o
c.
C5
U-)
0)
C)
5
<5
o
C5
C�
C�
C�
C�
C�
C�
ID
C�
d
O
0
a) U') r-
Ni
L6
4
6
6
P
4
(b
-
N
v)
u-)'
Q
co
Lo
c)
c>
a)
o
r-
CO
(L6
co
u-)
r--
u)
o
O
O
Lo
0) (D co
o
0
t
-
C14
Q0
CO
LO
Cl)
M
-
M
N
N
M
<r
Q0
�t
Lr)
(D
QO
LO C.0
00 CD
V)
(D co
0
CD
CD
C)
CD
CD
CD
C)
0
(D
CD
C)
0
(D
CD
C)
0
CD
CD
C)
CD
CD
CD
C)
0
C)
CD
CD
0
(D
CD
(D
C)
C)
C.
LO
0
C)
0
C)
C)
C)
C)
C)
0
Lo
Lo
CD
(D
C)
C)
C)
0
CD
LO
C)
U*)
C)
C)
0
C)
0
C)
0
C)
U
Z;
LO
C)
C)
LO
N
't-
LO
C)
0
N
N
LO
r-
LO
LO
C)
0
-
P
00
CO
CO
-
LO
LO
C)
LO
C)
c�
t
CO
(D
00
M
CO
LO
N
(0
CNJ
N
C-)
LO
P
N
-
N
(0
N
M
U)
CO
It
(1) z CD
(Fj
C6
LOi
N
-
V
P
C(5
a
LO
-
C\i
06
V5
0 C')
0
a) LO
> LO
Z a
0
Q
C)
C)
C)
C)
a
0
C)
C�
C)
0
C)
C)
(D
0
C)
CD
C)
0
C)
C)
C)
0
CD
Q
CD
0
C)
CD
CD
Y LO
C:)
c�
C>
q
C�
9
C�
C�
C�
q
q
C�
q
q
q
q
q
q
C�
9
q
q
C)
q
q
q
q
q
U*)
U*)
cl)
V)
O
Lr)
CO
N
U)
LO
0
LO
LO
CO
C)
C)
0
0
C6
C)
N
r.-
N
0
m
c.
6
(D
L (D
0
M
-
r-
CO
N
LO
LO
LO
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
L
LO
CO
N
'D C)
> CO E
M CD CD
Gq
O
LO
CO
C)
a
0
CD
C,
0
LO
LO
<D
"o
CD
�D
LO
Kf
r-
LO
C�
CD
0
C�
<D
m
C,
CD
m
�t
I-
N
CO
m
N
LO
M
N
CO
M
C)
I-
N
LO
fl-
U')
cli
Cl)
W M
CY
z
z
z
--j
O
0
(n
LL
LL
LL
0
0
0
>-
>-
U-
>-
U-
0
0
LL
¢
LL
U-
U-
U-
U-
U-
r
U
F-
C)
U)
-i
U)
-i
(D
C)
W
W
-i
W
-i
-j
J
J
J
J
W
W
W
W
W
w
0
z
CL
Z
w
LLI
CL
LU
CL
LLI
0
0
FL
CL
E�
6
-J
5;
a.
w
w
w
0
F-
w
a-
LU
CL
a
w
o
0
w
al:
0
0
U)
CD
In
E
F-
w
0
n
5�
z
F-
—
ob
CD
F-
I --
W
W
C)
X
F-
F-
w
Z
<
D
0
z
W
m
F-
D
z
I
<
<
<
w
CL
(L
m
(L
>
<
z
W
0
w
c
(D
0
rr
N
LO
0
o
co
m
W
0
W
CC
p
W
CL
w
w
w
o
I--
w
w
w
U)
CD
W
>
<
F�-
Z
C)
CL
LL
<
F-
F-
CO
w
rr
x
N
Z
0
0
>-
F-
w
o
z
0
C
a.
0
x
0
cli
<
0
F-
CD
F-
o z
><
<
Z n
ar
O
U)
C)
0
"
0
M
C
(D
75;
W
W
D
0
<
Z
(D
<
w
t
W
w
W
F-
w
co
Q
Z
P
-
F-
0
W
H>
w
u
z
O
H
Z)
g
0
-,
0
z
0
w
W
z
W
w
C�
M
E
Z
z
§ �
0
>-
<00<>Zo
z
<
> M
0
M
S
<
o
<
LLJ
CL
0
0
LLJ
tr
F-
w
0
0
<
<
2 <
z
z
0
2
w
x
i
z
I
ui
co
0
z
5
w
Z
- r
w
<
<
w
�z
<
CL
w
CL CD
z
D
w
w
C)
<W
:�!
C)
w
0
(/)
<
U)
0
>
O
O
F-
3:cr
W
W
Of
_j
<
z
- 1
w
<
<
w
cn
z
3:
D
0
n
w
F-
W
W
W
F-
2=
W
C
L)
co
cn
0
ui
CL
CO
M
0
0
C)
<
w
W
Of
w
o
0
w
>
z
.2 - 0 -J U)
N
w
(D
(D
LL
<
<
F-
X
W
>1
>
Z
w
a-
w
a �
LL
>
U)
U)
w
fy
m
CL
co
r)
73 w CL (D
>
0
z
z
w
Ir
<
m
w
0
W
0
-j
r)
0
w
a.
0
C)
0
c
m
m
m 0 < a
'a
CO
LLJ
w
(D
b
F-
_j
w
w
z
M
M
W
-
-x
>
>
C)
C)
CL
-
0
0
w
lw
M
C
5;
1
0-1
F-
CD
-j
0
_j
a.
CL
<
CL
CL
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
(D
'a
5
W
Cr
U)
<
U)
D
)
0
W
(j)
W
(D
U)
LL
co
(.D
:;t
00
"t
w
r
r
I M
-
-
I
-
I
-
I
Cl)
C
O
O
o
0
> 0
0 R. o I
z
2 z
E
I-
CL =
4)
O w
CD
-
N
M
q
LO
CO
t-
M
0
C)
N
M
Et
M
CO
r-
CO
0
O
�;
N
m o w
N
M
r
LO
CO
r-
W
M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
Cl)
co
CL
m
L6
O
O
a
M J
W
I
i
v
O
co
CL
r
o
0
0
0
0
o
d
o
0
0
0
0
o
Q
U?
O
O
O
o
0
01
L
LO
o
0
r
O)
o
co
U)
U)
0
0
0
0
0
x
0
0
0
0
Ul
d
N
O
Q
O
M
r-
m
LO
N
V
O
O
O
O
M
O
to
_o
LO
V
M
ti
r--
O
Q
co
U
d
M
M
rt
M
O
O
7
M
ti
Vp
N
Q
C>
� M
R
r•
N
t*.
CO L
`n
p
C14
s
a ca z
io .'
O
O
Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q
d
d
O
O
d
O
O
Q
Q
O
Q N
M
d
o
0
0
0
Cl
Cl
d
o
0
0
0
o
O
Q
d
O
0
0
0
0
cn Lf)
M
O
O
r•
00
U)
to
N
O
U)
O
O
M
O
co
O
M
Q CO
R: eJ) d
d
O
r+
O
a
O
m
Cl)
M
r
LO
Cl)
M
N
V
M
r•
N
r
a
O
O
O
M
LO
N
U)
N
<t
0)
C)
Y
(6 N
Y
C
0
z to e»
0 ,
d
a
d
a
o
(D
0
C)
d
a
d
a
o
0
0
LO
d
a
d
a
o
LC)
O
O
O
o
0
0
Q
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
r
O
OU�
Q
O
o
'i
6
6
o
O
o
0
0
0
o
6
6
0
o
0
o
M
o
o
N
0
0
n
CJ
d
V
Q
a
V
U)
O
U)
C0
O
LO
Q
d
0
C)
C)
q
0
d'
co
LO
O
co
_
Q
U)
M
a
(0
tl
r
r
M
M-
'It
M
U)
O
CO
N
r
N
+-
(0
cP
4'1
R
m
-
-
-
-
c-
N
N
N
CO
O
~
0 d Lo
LO
V).
o
O
Q
Q
O
C)
0
o
a
O
Q
d
d
O
O
d
O
a
Q
Q
0
Z Lo
7; O
O
O
O
o
0
0
Q
d
o
C)
0
o
LO
O
Q
LO
O
OU�
0
0
6) U) r•
s'
U)
O
o
0
o
0
6
0
6
0
U)
o
N
O
Q
r-
N
o
0)
0
o
W (0 tt) co
O
O
rt
U)
O
LO
M
O
d
N
<-
a
O
N
M
U)
a
G r CI�f-
d
LO
co
a
C0
r•
N
Cl)
M
U)
O
Cl)
-
M
LO i5 N
cu
M
N
N
p
(D M > 4A
G�?
d
O
a
d
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
d
a
O
O
O
O
O
a
d
a
O
O
O
V
O
C)
O
O
O
O
O
d
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U)
0
0
0
0
0
LCS
'i
U7
O
o
0
0
C)
0
0
C)
C)
0
0
0
C)
0
N
0
0
U)
0
0
n
(n
d
V
O
Q
O
O
O
O
Q
LO
O
Q
a
(,0
O
U)
CO
LO
LO
r-
d
0
r
i
Q
U)
U)
M
-
t
U)
M
M
U)
N
'It
t-
U)
r
U)
N
a
M
M
O
CO
CD
N
M
N
N
r
L0
r
r
V
N
Ni
O z C l)
O
(} > Lf
Kt
Z o
o
a
d
a
o
d
O
O
d
a
Q
d
d
O
O
d
o
a
Q
a
a
Y < <
2 2 Lo
wo
O
O
O
o
0
0
0
d
o
0
0
0
o
O
Q
d
LO
O
O
o
0
Cl) r
y "
LO
000000000)
C)
0LO
N
0
tri
00
V' >+
d r N 6F
d
Ct
LO
O
LO
C)
M
a
r
d
�t
d
in
LO
7
U)
M
a
N
a
U)
LO
r
LO
Cl)
O
M
a
U)
j OCO N
N
M
r
N
N
V
N
0)
M
N
to
Q
O
O
r
.-
LO
O
M
LO
co
r
c-
N
N
N
U)
N
O
N
�
m
W
CY
=
rYl
Q
a
Q
Q
<<
<t
W
LL
co
<
U-
LL
Q
J
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
U
0
J
J
J
W
W
J
W
0
Q
W
0
v
ccn
ci
LU
t
Imo-
W
W
z
rn
U
U)
}
O
W
C7
Z
�
°
H
W
LO
W
Q
O
3
W
o
(J)
(D
0
°
_
ry
U)
N
O
F-
t4
~
<[
H
0
Q
cos
O
w
±+
of
Q
7>
X
(n
W
U
Z
O
=
z
w
U
3:
N
@
Q
Q
LU
m
¢
><
>(
Q
U
O
Q
w
Q
Q
X°
O
Q�>
°'
°
°
Q
H
CD
u)
�:
00
00
d
C0
-
ui
W
Z
Z
z
-j
m
0
N
U
N
-
w
' t
M
M
>-
C'?
C,7
W
J
Z
Z
a
a
<t
cc
Q
r
w
w
z0
w
m
z
M
c N
z
a
U
co
m
Q
J
Q
fn
J
O
W
W
W
O
Q<
z
�'
C
Q
U
U
W
W
0
0 }
W
Z
a
d
CL o
O
0
0
I-
1-
I-
<��
W
O
U
Z
O
W
J
>'
E-
z
Q
<{
z
W
LLI
O
v m W
W
U
U
Q
Q
W
<C
O
O
5
X
W
W
O
O
z
Z
�
p J to
J
W
W
h
I-
H
z
z
z_
0
W
M
x
U
q
d
W
z
~
y Q C
�-
z
z
W
C0
U)
Elf
i-
°
h
U
C3
LL
v
U-
Q`
°
0r
J
CL t= - O
U
z
Z
Z
z
z
tl1
co
Cn
Z
O
Z
z
Q
U
z
H
O° °
I
__ m
z
O
0
0
0
0�
Q
Q
<(
w
O
O
ry
O�
J
�-
O>
o g <C s
°
U
U
U
U
U
Z
U
CU
�
cD
U
U
i-
�
co
to
U)
U)
=
O
O
p3 °'
Z
m
O d
d z o
E
a
a
m
p m W
M
q
U)
C0
r-
CO
M
O
N
CO
It
M
CO
h
M
d
O
N
CO
O
0. 2 c
M
CO
M
M
CO
M
M�
V
b'
V'T
V
d
"t
t
V
LO
L
U)
I LO
I h
v
O
co
CL
Item L -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: August 22, 2007
RE: Annual Lawful Gambling License — White Bear Avenue Business Association
Introduction
The White Bear Avenue Business Association is requesting approval of their annual
premise permits for lawful gambling at the AMF Maplewood Bowl and The Dive Bar.
Approval is requested of the following resolution.
RESOLUTION
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that
the premises permits for lawful gambling is approved for the White Bear Avenue
Business Association, to operate at AMF Maplewood Bowl located at 1955 English
Street, and The Dive Bar located at 3035 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the
timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling
Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit
application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council
of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their
approval.
Recommendation
It is recommended that council approve the lawful gambling resolution application for the
White Bear Avenue Business Association to operate at the AMF Maplewood Bowl and
The Dive Bar.
Item L-2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, Citizen Service Manager
DATE: August 22, 2007
RE: Owner/Manager Intoxicating Liquor License
Introduction
Dinh Yin Thong has submitted an application for an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to
serve wine and strong beer at Bambu Asian Cuisine located at 1715 A Beam Avenue.
Ms. Thong is the owner and will also be the license holder.
Background
Ms. Thong was born in Vietnam and came to the United States to live in St. Paul in 1992
and currently resides in Eden Prairie.
Ms. Thong attended Highland Park High School and then Hamline University. After
graduating from Hamline she began working in the mortgage business and works out of
offices in Bloomington, Edina and Chaska. This is Ms. Thong's first experience in the
restaurant and bar business.
Sergeant Crotty contacted Ms. Thong's references which spoke highly of her and as
required by City ordinances the necessary background investigation was completed by
the Police Department. In the course of the investigation, state and federal criminal
history files were checked along with contacts and warrants in the cities of Eden Prairie,
St. Paul, Chaska, Bloomington, Edina and Maplewood and the counties of Hennepin,
Carver and Ramsey.
Ms. Thong has been given a copy of the City Code of Ordinances that applies to being an
intoxicating liquor license holder and has met with Chief Thomalla personally to discuss
measures to eliminate the sale of alcohol to underage persons, general security and retail
crime related issues.
Consideration
It is recommended that the City Council approve the on-sale liquor license for the
purpose of selling wine and strong beer to Ms. Thong.
Item L-3
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfbile, City Clerk
DATE: August 22, 2007
RE: Meeting to Canvass Primary Election Results
The local Primary Election will be held on September 11, 2007. State
Statute directs, on or before the second day after the election, the governing
body of a city or a town conducting the primary election shall canvass the
returns and declare the results of the election.
It is requested that the city council call a special meeting to be held on
Thursday, September 13, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. in council chambers for the
purpose of canvassing the Primary Election results.
Agenda Item L4
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Charles /\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer
Michael Thompson, Civil Engineer 11
SUBJECT: Kohi00an Lane Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-21; Resolution
Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study
DATE: August 16.2007
INTRODUCTION/SU M MARY
The Kohiman Lane Area Street Improvements, bounded by Little Canada to the north and County Road C
to the south and Kohiman and Gervais Lakes to the east and west (see attached drawing), are listed in the
Maplewood Capital Improvement Plan GS8 proposed project fVrth82UO8constnJ[1ionG98S0n.Th8citv
council will consider initiating the project byapprovingtheatt8Chedn3S0|ution0nd8hngthepr8p8r8tioDof
the feasibility study.
Background
The Kohiman Lane Area Streets have continued to deteriorate over the years with the streets having a
current weighted average PC|| rating of21 (on 8scale from 1k)1U0). The streets in the rating, having 8
length of 0.65 miles, consist of Linden Lane, Kohiman Court, Beam Avenue, Meadowlark Lane, and
KOh|nn8DLone. The Keller Parkway street section between Arcade Street and Kohiman Lane would not be
included in the street reconstruction, only utility extensions. Utilities would be installed panS||8| to the street
in the boulevard area.
This project would COnSist Ofapproximately 0.86 miles of street reoDnstnuCtkon, including drainage and
utility innpn]v8nl8ntS/8xt8nsk]ns.|tis necessary tVreconstruct these streets b} improve serviceability and
drainage, meet city standards and relieve the maintenance department of repairs.
Staff will initiate the project prOCeSSondf8GSbi|itvStudvbvsendiDgGDiDfOrmGtk}Dhstterthisnl0DthtOthS
neighborhood residents. This fall the engineering department will begin topographic surveys and
preliminary engineering studies 0f the project 8pe8. Staff will follow Up with neighborhood meetings 8Sthe
feasibility study i3 being completed. |tis anticipated that the public hearing will b8 held late this fall.
An0t-bJ-emc89d project budgetOf$3O.0OOvvOu|db8Rsb]b|ishedf0rth8p jRCtdeve|Opnlent,tOu0OnaphiC
surveying, and preliminary engineering required for completing the feasibility study.
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the preparation of the
feasibility study for the Kohlman Lane Area Street Improvements, Project 07-21.
Attachments:
1 Resolution
2. Location Map
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to the Kohiman Lane Area Streets, City Project
07-21 and to assess the benefited properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
- AOT!, TMEREFORE, BE IT RESOL" OF RIARLEITJnr-Gl�
MINNESOTA:
That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is instructed
to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the
proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made
as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as
recommended.
FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $30,000 are appropriated to prepare this feasibility report.
Approved this 27th day of August 2007
COUNTY ROAD D COW
Sunset HIGHRIDGE CT.
Ridge
cn Park
LITTLE CANADA
f -2 <
c/)
LYDIA LAE. � >- 1--:
1 cn
2
0
3
ry
I--
cn BEAM AVE.
< k -_j
ry
< C
0- KohIman
Gervais Lake
Lake
X 61
/ �� �� COUNTY ROAD C
n Kohiman
0 Park
F-� 0
C
cn 3: cn 7
PALM I Manufactured
vo I Co Housing
. 01
CT
0 Estates
P 7 - U cn F
LU L� 2 0 Ali
U ry 3 c�
n
< CONNOR 4 CON NOR
AX/r-
PROPOSED 2008 STREET IMPROVEMENTS NO SCALE
KOHLMAN LANE AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
CITY PROJECT 07-21
Agenda Item L5
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Charles /\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer
Jon j@[OSch ' Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Myrtle-Idaho Area Street Improvements, City Project 07-19; Resolution
Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study
DATE: August 27.2007
INTRODUCTION/SU M MARY
The Myrtle-Idaho Area Streets, bounded by Larpenteur Avenue to the north and Montana Avenue to the
S0VLh /see attached dram»nni are listed in the Maplewood Capital |rnpr0v8rn8nL Plan as 8 pn}p0SRd project
for the 20O8 construction season. The city council will consider initiating the project by8ppn]vingLh8
attached resolution ordering the preparation 0f the feasibility study.
The Myrtle-Idaho Area Streets have continued tV deteriorate over the years with the streets having 8
current weighted average PC| rating Cf30.3 (on 8 scale from 1k}1OU\. The public works department
continues to spend a considerable amount of time maintaining these streets by patching potholes in severe
areas to sustain G [nininoUno |8v9| of service.
This project vvoU|d consist 0fapproximately 0.74 miles of street reconstruction, including drainage and
utility improvements. It is necessary to reconstruct these streets to improve serviceability and drainage,
meet city St8nd8njS and relieve the maintenance department of continual repairs. The majority of streets in
the area are without curb and gutter.
Staff will initiate the project prOCeSSondf8GSbi|itvStudvbvsendiDgGDiDfOrmGtk}Dhstterthisnl0DthtOthS
neighborhood residents. This fall, the engineering department will begin topographic surveys and
preliminary engineering studies 0f the project 8pe8. Staff will follow Up with neighborhood meetings 8Sthe
feasibility study i3 being completed. |tis anticipated that the public hearing will b8 held late this fall.
AnVt-tO-exC8ed project UUdg9tof $30.0OU would b8 established for the project d9v9|Vpnlert.t0000n8phiC
surveying, and preliminary engineering required for completing the feasibility study.
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the preparation of the
feasibility study for the Myrtle-Idaho Area Street Improvements, Project 07-19.
Attachments:
1. weoomunn
2. Location Map
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to the Myrtle-Idaho Area Streets, City
Project 07-19 and to assess the benefited properties for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is
instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary
way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to
whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and
the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount • $30,000 are appropriated to prepare this
feasibility report.
Approved this 27th day of August 2007
ry
LEY
z
CD
U
7
Hillside
Park
AVE.
KINGSTON
MGKNIGHT LN
MONTANA
W I-:
n- u/
ry
u NEE
0
0
�d
m
o�
wrVIERTN
Myrtle -Idaho Area Streets
City Project 07 -19
Location Map
L 3.
4 KNOLL
L
Agenda Item L6
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Charles /\hl. Public Works Director/City Engineer
Steve Kummer, Civil Engineer 11
SUBJECT: Pond Avenue and Dorland Road Improvements, City Project 07_20,
Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study
DATE: August 17 m ,2007
I NTRODU CTIONISU M MARY
Pond Avenue and Dorland Road (see attached drawing) has been in the Maplewood Capital
Improvement Plan Gs8 proposed project h]rUle 2OO8 construction season. The city council will
consider initiating the project bv8ppnJvingLhH8U3Chedr8s0|ULionondRhngLh8prHp8n8tion0f
the feasibility study.
Background
This project would tonsist of approximately 0.40 miles of street r8consLnJtU0n drainage and
utility improvements.
Uk5 necessary b] reconstruct these streets to improve serviceability and drainage, meet city
standards and relieve the maintenance department Cf continual repairs. City staff uses several
methods of evaluation to determine StRe9bS that are in need Of r9Q2Dst0CdOn. One of these
methods is through the use of pavement condition index (PCI) ratings which evaluate the
amount and severity of distress in existing pavements on81Lo1UOscale. The current average
PC| rating for Pond Avenue and [)or|8nd Road inthis area iS41. Other field observations have
indicated a need for remediation of several drainage structures and upgrades to existing storm
water treatment measures.
Staff will initiate the project process and feasibility study by sending an information letter this
month tO the neighborhood residents. This summer the engineering department will begin
topographic surveys and preliminary engineering studies of the project Gn8@. Staff will follow up
with neighborhood meetings by early fall as the feasibility study is being completed. It is
anticipated that the public hearing will be held in early fall.
Budget
Anot-to-8xce8d project bVdgHtof $3O would be established for the project development,
topographic surveying, and preliminary engineering required to complete the feasibility study.
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the preparation
of the feasibility study for the Pond Avenue and Dorland Road Improvement, City Project 07-20.
Attachments:
1. m*oomuvn
2. Site Map
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to Pond Avenue and Dorland Road,
City Project O7-20,8ndL08SS8GSLhHben8fitHdpnJpertvfor8Uor8portionCfLhe cost Cfthe
improvement, pursuant Lo Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOO1
That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that
he/she is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a
preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and
feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other
improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $30,000 are appropriated to prepare this
feasibility report.
Proposed Capital Improvement Plan for 2008
Pond Avenue and Dorland Road Improvements
City Project 07 -20
0
Agenda Item L7
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Ch@rleS/\hl Public Works Director/City Engineer
Michael Thompson, Civil Engineer 11
SUBJECT: Arkwright Utility Extension, Resolution Ordering Preparation of
Feasibility Study
DATE: /\UgU8t 17 2007
INTRODUCTION
Donald K8oriS considering @ lot split Ofthe property 8t394 Lark Avenue E. Please see the
attached location map which shows the existing sewer and water main. The city council will
consider initiating the project bv8ppn]vingLh88UBchedr8Go|ULiVnVnd8hngLhepr8p8n8tion0f
the feasibility study.
Mr. K8ar has approached the city regarding a possible lot split 8t3S4 Lark Avenue Eand
currently there is@ single family home On the site. {]n July 24"',2O07 the city received @petition
request from Mr. K@@rtO conduct @ feasibility study for extending public utilities; namely sanitary
sewer and water to service the possible lot split site. If the lot split were LO occur the newly
created |0L vv0V|d front Arhwright Street which currently has no sanitary sewer 0rwater utilities.
Staff will initiate the feasibility upon Council approval and staff will begin the feasibility process
upon 8$2.UUO cash deposit bvMr. Ka8c Once the feasibility study is finalized, city staff would
bring the study tn the Council for approval and calling for 8 public hearing. The feasibility study
will |OOk into costs and funding for the extension Of water and sewer on Arkwright Street
between Lark Avenue and Laurie Road. |t appears two additional lot splits could occur along
this portion of street and should be studied for utility extensions also.
A project budget Vf$2,0U0 would have bJbe provided bvthe petitioner, Mr. K8Gc City staff
would not begin the feasibility of this project until the funds are posted by Mr. Kaar.
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the preparation
of the feasibility study for the extension of sanitary sewer and water on Arkwright Street
between Lark Avenue and Laurie Road.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Location Map
3. Petition Letter
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to Arkwright Utility Extension between
Lark Avenue and Laurie Road, City Project 07-22,@OdbJ8S383sthRbRnSfitRdpnJp8rtvforG]|0r
a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOO1
That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is
iOStnJCt8d t0 report t0the council with all convenient speed advising the council in G pPS|inniDGry
way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to
whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement,
and the estimated cost Cf the improvement 8srecommended.
LOCATION MAP: 394 LARK AVENUE
ARKVVRlr,HT 11T11 ITY FXTFN.qinN CITY PRnFrTn7-99
WATER MAIN
TH 36
T
T11CCANADA
LAURIE RD E
------------------ - -
SANITARY
SEWER MAIN
- -----------
-------------------------
4no fi
DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information foration and]
data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only.
commercial SOURCES: Ramsey County (July 30, 2007), The Lawrence Group;July 30, 2007 for County parcel and property records data; July 2007 for commercial and
re
re
LAURIE RD E
------------------ - -
SANITARY
SEWER MAIN
- -----------
-------------------------
4no fi
DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information foration and]
data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only.
commercial SOURCES: Ramsey County (July 30, 2007), The Lawrence Group;July 30, 2007 for County parcel and property records data; July 2007 for commercial and
f
_ a
WU
5 CA N LT Ls CA 3 La CA. _
to
7
Ig
I�
F
I�
4�
!x
Agenda Item L8
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Pubic Works Director/City Engineer
Erin Laberee, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Mogren Street Improvements, City Project 06-17
1. Resolution ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll
2. Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment
Hearing for October 81h 2007
DATE: August 16, 2007
On May 14 the city council awarded the Mogren Street Improvements to Frattalone Companies for
$2,374,426.30. The next step in the improvement process is to order the preparation of the assessment
roll and then to approve the assessment roll. After the assessment roll is approved, an assessment
hearing should be scheduled for October 8 2007.
I ME=
Bruce Mogren is developing the former Countryview Golf Course site. As part of the development,
improvements to Beam Avenue and a new north south roadway connecting Beam Avenue to County Road
D are under construction. Frattalone Companies was awarded the bid and is currently constructing the
improvements. Bruce Mogren entered into a developer's agreement with the city and has signed an
assessment waiver for the roadway improvements.
An assessment roll has been prepared and is attached. The assessment roll identifies assessing the
properties a total of $2,500,000. An assessment hearing should be scheduled for October 8 2007 at 7:00
pm.
Budget Impact
The feasibility report identified assessing the developer $3,394,600. The assessment has been reduced
due to the nearly $900,000 cost saving on construction costs. The engineer's estimate for the project was
$3,250,000 and the low bid by Frattalone was $2,374,426.30. Therefore the assessment to the developer
was reduced as well. No budget revisions are necessary at this time.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolutions for the Mogren Street
Improvements, City Project 06-17, Ordering the Preparation of the Assessment Roll, and Accepting
Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment Hearing.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll
2. Resolution Accepting Assessment Roll and Ordering Assessment Hearing
3. Location Map
4, Assessment Roll
RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION [)F ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer will receive bids for the Mogren Street Improvements,
City Project 06-17.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OFMAPLEVVOO[).
MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially
assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece 0r parcel [f land abutting onthe
streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in the city office for inspection.
FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council
RESOLUTION
ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING
WHEREAS, the clerk and the city engineer have, at the direction of the council, prepared 8n
assessment roll for the K8ogn8n Street Improvements, City Project 00-17.andthesaidoS3e3smentud|isOn
U|8 in the office Vf the city engineer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF |NAPLEVVOO[).
MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall m b8h8|donth88 day of October 20O7.ot the city hall otY:0Up.nn.tOpass
upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected bysuch
improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause 8notice of the hearing on the proposed
assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail
notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment.
The notice Of hearing shall state the date, time and place Of hearing, the general nature Ofthe
improvement the area tob8 assessed, that the proposed assessment roll |s0n file with the clerk and city
engineer and that written or oral objections will b8considered.
VADNAIS HEIGH 11 s4 9. COTTAGE LANE LN.
10, COTTAGE LANE LN.
11. COTTAGE LANE LN.
@COUNTY ROAD D
Q I Sunset HIGHRIDGE CT.
Ridge
Park
z
Q `
I of "
U to w =; I
J LYDIAUAVE. Ic-n- w� E
t1
� P
BEAM AVE.
0 T
COUNTY ROAD COUNTY ROAD D CT.
}I u
D CIR.
1
VILLAGE TR.
D
61
Q
!1
g
CHAMBERLAIN ST.
t J
t
8
v_
6.
!
LEGACY Q�
O MINGWAY T
8. COTTAGE LANE LN.
Ir
7
5 I1
COUNTY ROAD D
10. f-1 u
11 WOODLYNN
Legg acy
AVE. S Vifloge
GVLD
~
Pa rfk re
R 1. SUMMIT CT.
ST. JOHN'S
2. COUNTRYVI CIR.
BLVD.
3. DULUTH
tn
Z
?
i—
o
w
f l
BEAM
FO
I"ZZ Location
/ Kohlman
Lake \\ w >z
11
KOHLMAN g AVE.
W I;
\ - COUNTY ! ;' ROAD
p kohlman
CIO Park S� rGIJ ± {t}
J
Manufactured p { ��1,�\ I O
J V) 1 Housing s �/, t Q Z
O Estates 7D! I �e -)W
Z � v w 5 2 h °
aN : 3 CT co
ii w
4 CON ,NOR 0
AVE. Z
,ION AVE.. ! pFz W 4r
3 1 - J O 113 U tb
i Iw ��
)OKS �' � J
CT. -J
Q � j l � Q -J
AVE
TANT
GERVAIS AVE.
�kwY
no scale
o =
w Markham
Q
Pond ,\I
X
C)
�- Z
Q North
Hazelwood
(fit} Q w Park
w
m C , c�
R Z
I O 1 J
i ii W
Z_jj tYM= �
I i I
w
GO ; DEMONT I AVE. m
>-' IBROOK I; E F G
AVE.
Harvest C)
Park 0�
I
M ,I JFour NT A � 0
GRANDVIEW AVE. `.
i
Project Location
Mogren Street Improvement 00 -17
LUM-1i
•
•
•
•
•
ti
tC
C)
U
ui
0
Ix
a.
0
z
W
vJ
W
U)
Cl)
co: r rP is 00
CD
Ln r- 64 :: q
CD
4 1-: (xi to
6
CW U' ) C a)
CD
(D "t
CD
t6 L6
C�
N: Lr) 04 : 0)
0
oo CD M C4
Ln
0
04
V) 60-: 6cl: W,
(a
CD OD co
CD
co: 't (c) C\j
CD
Lr) r Lo 1
0
OD CO 0): r—
CD
, 11
U)
6 �
�
C\J: N ioo
CD
I CD cy) co
Q
llz 1-: mo
ti
C\I: cc) r- C14 cc)
: (0:00: (D
0
CD
LO: r— : N N
r-
M
C It U C)
CD
o') cy") to :: �
CD
4 6 Lr56
6
(z): a): CD: 0')
CD
C "t C-4 C:)
CD
I-
to C): LO: 0)
0
(0::�::CO::L0
C5
0
in
Vs: 6r): U9,
(a
I 't N is fl-
0
, t : : (b M m
C5
co: Cf) : co
CD
4:: 0)
0
m
Cy): LO: CO: I
In
U c): CY)
I-
V) ua V) te
6
U tom- (0 CC)
CD CD CD C)
(=):: C) 5 C)
::
C N C 64
C\J: CN N3 'N
C , 4 : : N C N
M:M
lC
Z
C\I N : C C\4
cy)
c) C) 0 C)
En
N ce): 0
0
0 : 0 :
6 ::—:
0
Knaak & Kantrud, P.A
A T T O R N E Y S AT LAW
OF COUNSEL:
Tom Dailey
Don Kohler
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 22 August 2007
TO: City Manager, Greg Copeland
t H. Alan Kantrud
hakantrud @klaw.us
direct: 612.743 -4242
114 Qualified Neutral by the
Minnesota State Bar Association
RE: Complaint regarding Xcel & former Ramsey County Compost Site by
Elizabeth Sletten
In recent weeks a citizen of Maplewood has brought forward a complaint regarding the
presence compost and compost-like materials at the Kohlman Lake substation site operated
by Xcel Energy along County Road D. Specifically the complaint cites a debris pile and a
separate area apparently dedicated to compost storage according to the assertions in the
complaint. The same complainant has also been directing the City's attention to the
former Ramsey County - operated compost site on Beam Avenue. I am attaching copies of
the complaints for easy reference.
While I can't speak for any other agency the complainant has contacted, I have attached
my responses to the complaints as well as the response from the owner and operator of the
site, Xcel Energy, regarding that particular issue. As you can see from the letter, Xcel has
responded with an explanation as well as a commitment to action. In the City's case we
are looking into what, if any, agreements or memos of understanding may exist with
respect to the site. I would not regard this operation a public nuisance, and the planning
staff has assured me that the site could be used in that way, but should have a permit to do
so. So we may develop some agreement or insist upon a permit depending on what turns
up.
For over a year now the City has also been deluged with data requests from Ms. Sletten.
The requests have required a single page response up to literally hundreds of e -mail
communications between city staff and legal counsel. It should be noted that the City has
taken numerous steps in an attempt to comply with Ms. Sletten's broad data requests.
Specifically, hiring temporary staff to process the large amount of documentation requested
to ensure that no private or confidential information was released.
These MGDPA requests from the complainant have included a running complaint
regarding the former Ramsey County Compost Site formerly located on Beam Avenue in
Maplewood. The City's only participation in that site was the permitting of it for that use
at that time at the request of Ramsey County. The site has not been used as a composting
facility since June 12, 2000. (See the attached report for city staff and companion vote to
terminate Conditional Use Permit in 2000.) It is also interesting to note that the previous
City Attorney has indicated that the complainant did not raise any of these issues prior to
last summer.
The complainant has consistently maintained that the site is polluted with a variety of
substances, even while in 2005 settling her legal claims against Ramsey County in which
she made similar allegations. The current complaint alleges that long -dead trees ringing
the wetland on the site died due to the pollution on the site.
The City has answered the complaint by way of the City Naturalist's opinion that the
condition is not unnatural and certainly not a nuisance; quite the contrary—the trees
actually provide habitat for a diversity of creatures.
The other consistent theme of the complaint and complaining is that the City is not taking
the issue seriously or is somehow ignoring the matter altogether. It should be noted that
the complainant has made, her complaint to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency,
(MPCA) asking that it make the appropriate inquiries. This is the proper procedure. Yet
there are demands that extensive and expensive testing be done by the City on this parcel
of private property. If the complainant desires to make a claim against the property owner
private legal advice should be sought by Ms. Sletten for a more thorough analysis of the
claims and remedies, if any.
Determining and managing polluted sites is a task the Minnesota Legislature has assigned
t, Zn
to scientists and other qualified experts at the MPCA. The City of Maplewood utilizes the
MPCA to assist us with the funding and cleanup of our public lands.
The former Ramsey County compost site is on private land and the complainant signed a
t,
settlement agreement on her claims against Ramsey County in a suit where the City of
Zn
Maplewood was dismissed as a defendant in 1998; Ms. Sletten's relief lies with the MPCA
and/or the courts, not with the City of Maplewood.
July 26, 2007 SENT VIA U.S. MAIL
AND FASCiLUME
H. Alan Kantrud, Attorney at Law Greg Copeland, Manager
Knaak & Kantrud, P.A. City of Maplewood
3500 Willow Lake Blvd., Suite 800 1830 County Road B East
'V'adnais Heights, Minnesota 55110 Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Fax: 651 -490 -1580 Fax: 651- 249 -2009
Du'Wa�ne Konewko, Staff Liaison Tom Grundhoefer, General Counsel, Legal
City of Maplewood League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust ( "LMCIT")
1830 County Road B East 145 University Avenue West
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 St. Paul, Minnesota 55103
Fax: 651 Fax: 651
Stanley S. Hubbard, Chairman and CE
Iiubbard Broadcasting, Inc. ( "KSTP ")
3415 University Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota. 55114
Fax: 651 -642 -4103
Dear Mr. Kantrud, Mr. Copeland, Mr. Konewko, Mr. Grundhoefer, and Mr. Hubbard:
In addition to my It tter dated :Iul� 23, 2007,1 am continuing to respond to Mr, Kantrud's letter
dated July 12, 2007.
Prior to the onset of the Maplewood City Council meeting on July 23, 2007, the City Manager,
Greg Copeland approached me to discuss the "official environment report" in which Staff
Liaison, DuWayne Konewko stated he had written during the July 10, 2007 Environmental and
Natural Resources Commission meeting and furthermore retracted via telephone on July 23,
2007.
asked Mr. Copeland "Is Adr. Soutter an official city employee? " Mr. Copeland stated "No, he
is a contractor ". I further inquired, " Does Mr. Soutter have his own business ?" Mr. Copeland
stated, '7 don't know".
I am very concerned to have learned that not only is Chrristirte Soutter not an " City of
Maplewood employee, but also that Mr. Copeland has no knowledge of Ms. Soutter's
PT/TA gild L T9 0 000MA 1dVW
TZ8T6LLT99T BT :OT LBOZILZ /L0
employment and educational background that should include Federal Environmental
contamination rules, laws, regulations and policies. Mr. Copeland should have received this
information directly from Maplewood Staff Liaison, DuWayne Konewko prior to approaching
me.
Additionally, Ms. Soutter, the "N6turalrst/7'ree Inspector" from the "Maplewood Nature
Center" wrote an "official environmental report" on City of Maplewood letterhead. This action
by Ms. Soutter is fraudulent dine to the fact that she is an independent contractor and is
representing herself as an "official city" employee.
Apparently, Ms. Soutter did not complete and/or further conduct any "Wetlands Health Chart"
cued functions and values assessments of the area,
Mr. Kantrud in your July 12, 2007 letter, one of the areas in which you specifically mentioned
was in respect to the "trees you reference are not and will not be interrupting any public
services or utilities in their current condition either. Were that the case the utility companies
already have the authority to enter upon the premises and correct the problem."
To your own admission, you state that the "Beam Avenue Compost Site" is a'publiepremises".
Within the official city documentation, the "Beare Avenue Compost Site " closed in .tune 2000.
In 1994, Ramsey County conducted a water quality "Summary Report" (see partial test results,
attachment #1). Will& Ramsey County's own report they found Federal chemicals which were
banned in the 1970's. Within the "official report" prepared by Ms. Soutter, there was no testing
of these Federal chemicals conducted.
As the U.S. Department of Justice, Environmental and Natural Resources Division has been
specifically aware of this issue since 1998, they have not received any other factual evidence
from our previous legal representatives (see attachment #2) that we are aware of. However, as
Mr. Mariani, Jr. clearly stated within his letter "we would be prepared to review sash data ".
EVZO 3Jdd LT90 QOOM31dVW TZGIGLLT99T OT:OT L00ZILZILO
In conclusion, when trees are dead, trees are dead! There is a scientific reason these trees are
dead. This is not a "seasonal wetland complex classification" and therefore pursuant to the City
of Maplewood's Code, the city is not exempt and furthermore the §18.31(8) exemption for
wetlands does not apply.
The City of Maplewood is continuing to blatantly and disrespectfully ignore the Citizens' of
Maplewood that have been bringing forth factual information to the City of Maplewood
regarding the "Beam Avenue Compost Site " since the 1980
At what time will the Citizens' of Maplewood who's personal and private properties, homesteads
personal injuries, and livelihood receive their due rights and process?
During the Maplewood City Council meeting on July 23, 2007, the City clearly admitted to
mailing an ordinance/zoning "mistake" and immediately stated "on the record" that they are
going to reimburse expeditiously the Keller Lake Convenience Store located at 2229 Maplewood
Drive, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 for their propane tank within the next "90 days"
This "mistake" was brought on by City Staff Planner, Ken Robert's 2006 personal decision that
allowed the Keller Lake Convenience Store to illegally place the propane tank on his business
premises in the first place.
This continued "selective" process in which the City of Maplewood has been conducting their
"official city business" needs to cease immediately. There are a multiplicity of "mistakes that
have occurred because of the previous council's "blind eye" to the problems of the Compost Site.
The City of Maplewood has "inherited" these problems, and MUST resolve the significant health
hazard that the Compost Site is to the people of Maplewood.
The "Beam }Avenue Cwrapost Site " problems have not been resolved. There is evidence that
Agent Orange, Silvex and other heavy chemicals are still present at the site. Nothing has been
3
E1/60 Dovd LT90 QOOMA TZ8TGLLT99T OT:oT L00Z /LZ /L0
done to remove these chemicals from the site, and these chemicals continue to pose a
considerable health hazard to the Citizens.
Today after personally speaking to the Maplewood City Manager, Mr. Copeland via telephone
and in person, I am officially requesting the following;
1. Detailed expenditure report of all expenses that have been paid to Ms. Soutter for her
services provided to the City of Maplewood.
2. All specific /detailed testing in which I inquired in my letter dated July 23, 2007 of the
"Beam Avenue Compost Site " 'be conducted immediately.
3. An official, recorded meeting with Greg Copeland, City of Maplewood Manager, H.
Alan Kantrud, Legal Counsel for the City of Maplewood; Stanley S. Hubbard, Chairman
and CEO, Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. ( "KST "); Elizabeth Sletten and Ralph and
Veronica Sletten, to take place after all test results have been produced , to all of the
mentioned parties above. However, this meeting should not be scheduled later than
August 31, 2007,
4. A plan of action that the governing body of the City of Maplewood will be taking to
remove the hazardous chemicals from the "Beam Avenue Compost Site ".
Please respond on or before August 3, 2007, Additionally, please note that my address is current
on my original letter dated June 29, 2007 and as listed below.
Very truly,
r
Elizabeth A. Sletten
2747 N. Clarence Street
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Tel: 763 - 7832473 or 651 -484 -7074
elizabeth007(comcast.net
Attachment(s)
Cc; Maplewood Ci!y Council Members (vio hand delivery)
Mayor Diana Longrie
Rebecca Cave, Council Member
Erik Hjelle, Council Member
Kathleen Juener ann, Council Member
Will Rossbach, Council Member
4
PT /bA - AL)VrI LT90 G00M3 TZBT5L1T99T OT :OT LOOZILZILO
Environmental and Natural Resources Commission Members (via hand delivery)
James Beardsley
Margaret Behrens
Carole Lynne
Carol Mason Sherrill
John Mason
Tom Moibi
Ginny Yingling
5
PT /cn -4r,ti,4 / T90 GODM I�ddW ZZ8TGLLT99Z 0T :OT L00Z /LZ /LB
OFFICIAL NOTICE - DATED MATERIAL
August 5, 2007
Xcel Energy Inc.
Excel Energy
Paul J. Bonavia, President - Utilities Group
Michael C. Connelly, VP and General Counsel
414 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 -1993
City of Maplewood
Greg Copeland, Manager
Ken Roberts, Planner
Chuck Ahl, Director Public Works /City Engineer
DuWayne Konewko, Staff Liaison
Michael Samuelson, Code Enforcement Officer
Molly Wellens, Health Officer
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Saint Paul- Ramsey County Department of Public Health
Zack Hansen, Environmental Health Section Manager
Mike Crider, Community Environmental Health
Environmental Health Section
2785 White Bear Avenue North, Suite 350
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 -1320
SENT VIA U.S. MAIL, FASCIMILE
AND / OR HAND DELIVERY
H. Alan Kantrud, Attorney at Law
Knaak & Kantrud, P.A.
3500 Willow Lake Blvd., Suite 800
Vadnais Heights, Minnesota 55110
MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)
Roberta Wirth, Solid Waste Division
Geoffrey Strack, Solid Waste Division
Stephen Mikkelson, Information Officer
520 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -4194
US EPA Region 5
Office of the Regional Hearing Clerk
Attn.: Sonja Brooks - Woodard
77 W. Jackson Blvd., Mailcode: E -13J
Chicago, IL 60604 -3590
Fax: 312 -886 -9697
Re: Formal Notice — Complaint/Investigation and Meeting Request(s)
XcelEnergy
Kohlman Lake Substation
3070 Maplewood Drive
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Dear Mr. Bonavia, Mr. Connelly, Mr. Copeland, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Ahl, Mr. Konewko, Mr. Samuelson,
Ms. Wellens, Mr. Kantrud, Mr. Hansen, Mr. Crider, Ms. Wirth, Mr. Struck, Mr. Mikkelson, and Ms.
Brooks - Woodard:
Since early spring 2007, there has been a strong odor that has been coming from the north/northeast
direction of our homes. Due to the hot summer days this putrid odor has substantially intensified. After
`following our noses" we located where this putrid odor is admitting from.
On August 2, 2007, after driving west and east on County Road D from both Highway 61 and Hazelwood,
in plain view you can clearly see oversized piles of decomposing materials from the XcelEnergy,
Kohlman Lake Substation ( "Kohlman Lake Substation ") (see photographs, attachment(s) #1 -7).
As numerous local, state and federal agencies are aware, the risks posed to the public and environment
whether the actions /conduct has been an isolated incident or part of a pattern of violations Excel Energy is
currently violating each agencies rules, regulations, ordinances and policies.
This "Kohlman Lake Substation" is known as "a very important piece of infrastructure for electrical
utilities in the NE metropolitan area ", t 2 3 a
I am very concerned to not only have become aware that the City of Maplewood does not have any
documentation of this, but they completely ignored this major issue while on the "City Tour" on Monday,
July 30, 2007, the City of Maplewood Planning Commission, City Council, the HRA, the CDRB, the
Environmental and Natural Resources Commission, the Historical Preservation Commission and staff
liaisons drove right past this illegal activity 5 (see attachment #8).
It is clear that XcelEnergy has made a conscious decision to start an illegal /private composting/trash
operation/facility at there ( "Kohlman Lake Substation ").
1 See January 2003 - Environmental Assessment Worksheet Prepared by: URS Corporation for the County Road D
Realignment Project in Maplewood, Minnesota. Responsible Governmental Unit: City of Maplewood. Proposer: City of
Maplewood.
'See City Council Minutes for Wednesday, November 12, 2003 — City Council of the City of White Bear Lake, Minnesota.
3 See City Council Minutes for Tuesday, April 27, 2004 — City Council of the City of White Bear Lake, Minnesota.
4 See Official City of Maplewood "Minutes ", Maplewood City Council for Monday, July 11, 2005 — Meeting No. 05 -13
5 No. 26 -- "New County Road D (Highway 61 to Hazelwood Street) The city in 2006, in cooperation with Ramsey County and
MnDOT, built a new County Road D from Hazelwood Street to Highway 6 1."
In conclusion, XcelEnergy and The City of Maplewood arc bluntly and disrespectfully ignore the
Citizens' of Maplewood. At what time are business owners /staff and The City of Maplewood
Officials) /staff going to be held responsibly for their wrong doings.
According to the "CODE OF ORDINANCES, City of Maplewood, Minnesota, ARTICLE II.
NUISANCES ", 678 910 Excel Energy and The City of Maplewood are in direct violation of these codes
and other rules, regulations, policies and laws and therefore need to be held accountable for their actions
and inactions.
6 Division 1., Sec. 18 -26., "Unlawful to cause, create or commit. ":
" (a) It shall be unlawful for any person in the city to commit, cause or create a public nuisance or to permit any
public nuisance to be created orplaced upon or to remain upon any premises in the city owned or occupied by him.
(b) Each day that any violation of subsection (a) of this section continues shall constitute a separate violation. "
(Code 1982, § 19 -1)
7 Division 1., Sec. 18 -27., "Common law and statutory nuisances adopted by reference. ":
"In addition to what may be declared in this article to be nuisances and how the nuisances may be removed, abated
or prevented, those offenses which are known to the common law of the land and the statutes of the state as nuisances are
hereby adopted by reference to be nuisances for the purposes of this article and may, f they exist within the city limits, be
treated as such and proceeded against as provided in this article or in accordance with any other applicable law. " (Code
1982, § 19 -2)
$ Sec. 18 -30. "Public nuisances generally.
"A public nuisance is a thing, act or use ofproperty which shall ":
"(1) Annoy, injure or endanger the health, safety, comfort or repose of the public;
(2) Offend public decency;
(3) Unlawfully interfere with the use of or obstruct or tend to obstruct or render dangerous for passage a public
waster, park, square, street, alley or highway,
(4) Depreciate the value of the property of the inhabitants of the city or of a considerable number thereof, or
(S) In any way render the inhabitants of the city or a considerable number thereof insecure in life or in use of
property. " ( Code 1982, § 19 -6)
s Sec. 18 -31. "Nuisances affecting health, safety, comfort or repose. ":
(8) All noxious weeds. Noxious weeds shall be as defined by the state department of agriculture. Tall grasses and
other rank growths that are adversely affecting the public health, safety, welfare, comfort or repose shall also be considered
a public nuisance. Wetlands and public open space, such as parks, nature centers or county open space, are exempted from
the tall grass part of this subsection. The noxious weed requirements shall apply. The environmental health officer shall
interpret and enforce this subsection, subject to an appeal to the city council;
(9) Throwing, dumping or depositing any dead animals, manure, garbage, decaying matter, ashes, rubbish, tin
cans or other putrescent material of any kind on public or private property which is not designated as a public dump; "
10 *State law references — Definition of the Term "nuisance," Minn. Stats. § 561.01; public nuisances, Minn. Stats. §
609.74; power of the city to regulate, prevent and to abate nuisances, Minn. Stats. §§ 145.22, 145.23, 412.221, subd. 23,
429.021, subd. 1(8).
3
I am officially noticing and requesting from all parties addressed above the following to be implemented
immediately and expeditiously in the following order(s):
1. Official notification to the requestor /signee of all immediate personnel /agency assessments of the
area to be completed on or before Tuesday, August 7, 2007.
2. Official notification from the MPCA of an Administrative Penalty Orders ( "APO ") to the
following parties:
a. ExcelEnergy;
b. The City of Maplewood; and
c. Ramsey County
3. Official notification from the MPCA of a Stipulation Agreement(s) (STIPs) to the following
parties:
a. ExcelEnergy;
b. City of Maplewood; and
c. Ramsey County
4. Official notification from the EPA's Criminal 11 Investigation Division (EPA CID) to the following
parties below of the (OECA) , (EPCRA) 12 , ( FOIA) 33 (PPA) 14 , ( SDWA) 15, (RCRA) 16,
(CERCLA) 17 and (ESA) 18 , however if the EPA finds other /additional violations and "Acts ", the
below parties shall be noticeD immediately as deemed appropriate:
a. ExcelEnergy;
b. The City of Maplewood; and
c. Ramsey County
5. Detailed testing of the environment/composting piles which should include but not be limited to:
a. Environmental Assessment Worksheet;
b, air quality;
c. ground and surface water; and
d, soil sampling
6. Notification to all residence(s) and business(es) within a 5 mile radius which include(s) and not
limited to:
a. admission of the illegal composting and nuisance activities;
b. health and wellness surveys to be completed by each individual resident(s) /worker(s)
11 Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) — Region 5.
12 The Emergency Planning & Community Right -to -Know Act (EPCRA); 42 U.S.C. 1 1011 et seq. (1986)
13 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA); 5 U.S.C. 552 and at 40 C.F.R. Part 2, FOIA
14 Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) — 42 U.S.C. 13101 and 13102, s/s et seq. (1990)
" The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA); 42 U.S.C, sls 300f et seq. (1974)
16 Resource conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); 42 U.S.C. s/s 321 et seq. (1976)
" Comprehensive Environmental Response, compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Super€und); 42 U.S.C. s/s 9601 et seq. (1980)
la The Endangered Species Act (ESA); 7 U.S.C. 136; 16 U.S.C. 460 ct seq. (1973)
4
c. Detailed action plan(s) in which each of the addresses will be taking to resolve this matter
expeditiously.
d. Notification of any and all ( "APO "), ( "STIPs ") and/or other formal agreement(s), which
are enforced within a 30 day period and /or between all parties.
7. Immediate removal of all decomposing materials, compost, wood, vegetative plant materials,
garbage which includes: metal, plastic and other trash.
S. An " Official Special Meeting" located at the City of Maplewood for all residence(s) and
worker(s) which should include the following agencies and official materials:
a. Representative(s) from each agency including:
i. Xcel Energy;
ii. City of Maplewood;
iii. Ramsey County Department of Public Health — Environmental Health Section;
iv. Environmental Protection Agency ( "EPA "); and
v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ( "MPCA ").
b. Copies — all detailed test results for distribution:
i. Test results should be mailed to each individual on or before August 27, 2007.
c. Copies — all detailed computations of health and wellness surveys:
i. Test results should be mailed to each individual on or before August 27, 2007.
d. Copies of all detailed ( "APO ") Order(s)
e. Copies of all detailed ( "STIPs ") Order(s)
f. Dated "Action Plan" in which each residents) /worker(s) within the 5 mile radius will be
compensated for the following below:
i. Medical expenditures;
ii. Nuisance; and
iii. Any personal investigation/research and other expenditures.
This meeting should take place after all test results have been produced to all the mentioned
parties, residence(s) and worker(s). However, not to exceed September 10, 2007.
Very truly,
Elizabeth A. Sletten
2747 North Clarence Street
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Tel: 753783 -2473 or 651- 484.7074
el izabeth007L&conmcast.net
Attachment(s)
Cc: Torn Grundhoefer, General Counsel, Legal
League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust ( "LMCIT")
145 University Avenue West
St. Paul, Minnesota 55103
5
Michele Bachmann, U.S. Representative, 6ch District
Betty McCollum, Congresswoman, 0 District
Charles W. Wiger, Senator, District 55
Maplewood City Council Members (via hand delivery)
Mayor Diana Longrie
Rebecca Cave, Council Member
Erik Hjelle, Council Member
Kathleen Juenemann, Council Member
Will Rossbach, Council Member
Environmental and Natural Resources Commission Members (via hand delivery)
James Beardsley
Margaret Behrens
Carole Lynne
Carol Mason Sherrill
John Mason
Tom Moibi
Ginny Yingling
,rssioners (via hand delivery)
Ramsey _ Count _ oar o omm ssio___
Tony Bennett, Chair, District 1
Jan Parker, District 2
Janice Rettman, District 3
Toni Carter, District 4
Rafael Ortega, District 5
Jinn McDonough, District 6
Victoria Reinhardt, District 7
6
xc
August 9, 2007
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
Elizabeth A. Sletten
2747 North Clarence Street
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Kohlman Lake Substation
Dear Ms. Sletten:
Lauren C. Buehler-
Assistant General Counsel
922517th Street, Suite 900
Denver, CO 80202 -5533
Phone: 303.294.2972
Fax: 303.294.2988
s
This letter is written in response to your letter, dated August 5, 2007, regarding the odor
allegedly emanating from Xcel Energy's Kohlman Lake Substation. Your letter states that there
are "oversized piles of decomposing materials" on the substation property, and that Xcel Energy is
operating an illegal composting /trash facility, which has allegedly created a nuisance in violation
of a variety of City Ordinances.
Xcel Energy takes its responsibility as an environmental steward and good corporate
citizen very seriously. Immediately upon receiving your letter, we investigated the substation
property. We noted demolition debris, bags of grass clippings, and broken cable spools along the
road bordering the substation property to the north. This debris is shown in the photographs
included as Attachments 6 and 7 to your letter. Xcel Energy, however, did not generate this
debris. The demolition debris appears to be from a home remodeling project. In addition, we have
an established program to recycle or scrap our cable spools and we do not dispose of spools on
property surrounding the substation. Moreover, the substantial majority of the debris is not even
located on Xcel Energy's property. As such, we have no legal obligation to remove the debris.
However, as a member of the Maplewood community, we feel it is incumbent upon all of us to
help keep the City clean. In this instance, therefore, we will remove the debris and dispose of it in
a properly approved landfill. Please note that by doing so, however, we are not accepting any type
of ongoing obligation to remove debris along the road.
There is also a legally permitted wood chipping operation on the substation property,
which includes two piles of wood chips. One of the piles of wood chips is visible in the
photograph included as Attachment 4 to your letter. The City of Maplewood approved the wood
chipping operation in 1994. The wood chips are not decomposing, nor do they emit any odor,
other than the smell of freshly chipped wood. The wood chip piles are removed every 2 -3 months;
the last piles were removed in June 2007.
Our investigation has concluded that Xcel Energy is neither operating any type of illegal
trash facility nor creating a public nuisance. We are not legally responsible for the debris located
along the road. In addition, the two wood chip piles that are on our property are permitted and
approved by the City of Maplewood. In short, the substation property is not the source of the
"putrid odor" coming from the north/northeast of your home.
f
Elizabeth A. Sletten
Kohhnan Lake Substation
August 9, 2007
Page 2
Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.
V y truly yours,
r
auren C. Buehler
cc: City of Maplewood
Greg Copeland, Manager
Ken Roberts, Planner
Chuck Ahl, Directory Public Works
DuWayne Konewko, Staff Liaison
Michael Samuelson, Code Enforcement
Molly Wellens, Health Officer
Saint Paul -- Ramsey County Department of Public Health
Zack Hansen, Environmental Health Section Manager
Mike Crider, Community Environmental Health Manager
H. Alan Kantrud, Esq.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Roberta Wirth, Solid Waste Division
Geoffrey Strack, Solid Waste Division
Stephen Mikkelson, Information Officer
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5
Sonja Brooks- Woodard
Maplewood City Council
Mayor Diana Longric
Rebecca Cave, Council Member
Erik Hjelle, Council Member
Kathleen Juenemann, Council Member
Will Rossbach, Council Member
Environmental & Natural Resources Commission
James Beardsley
Margaret Behrens
Carole Lynne
Carol Mason Sherrill
John Mason
Tom Moibi
Ginny Yingling
Ramsey County Board of Commissioners
Tony Bennett, Chairman District 1
Jan Parker, District 2
Janice Rettman, District 3
Toni Carter, District 4
Rafael Ortega, District 5
Jim McDonough, District b
Victoria Reinhardt, District 7
U.S. Representative Michele Bachmann
Congresswoman Betty McCollum
Senator Charles W. Wiger
Tom Gundhoefer, General Counsel
KNAAK & KANTRUD, P.A.
Attorneys at Law
Frederic W. Knaak *_
H. Alan Kantrud **
Greg T. Kryzer**
*Also Licensed in
Wisconsin & Colorado
*Qualified neutral under
Rule 114 of the Minnesota
General Rules of .practice
3500 Willow Lake Blvd., Suite 800
Vadnais Heights, MN 55110
Telephone: (651) 490 -9078
Facsimile: (651)•490 -1580
Of Counsel
Donald W. Kohler
Joseph B. Marshall
Thomas M. Dailey, P.A.
Theodore M. "Ted" Thompson
10 August 2007
Ms. Elizabeth Sletten .
2747 North Clarence Street_
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE. Correspondence of June 26, 2007 regarding trees in wetland complex
Dear Ms. Sletten:
You recently delivered correspondence to the City that continued to voice your concerns
regarding the trees located on the KSTP property. along Beam Avenue as well as your concern
over the credentials of the City's naturalist, Ms. Soutter.
I can assure you that Ms. Soutter has the necessary credentials to perform her role as a naturalist
for the City. Ms. Soutter has a college degree in Biological Sciences and a Masters in Botany. In
addition she is certified by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture as a, "tree inspector." In
terms of training for some of the legal and regulatory standards you reference, I do not believe
her job entails any interaction with those on a day to day basis and therefore the City would not
require her to have such training/knowledge.
With respect to your request that the City undertake further study and inquiry on the site itself I
can only tell you that the property is the subject of litigation of which you are very familiar with.
With respect to your on -going concerns regarding the trees in the wetland complex you refer to
as a, "compost site," I have already written to you that, under the Maplewood City Code, it is not
my interpretation that these trees constitute a nuisance and directed you to the § 18.348)
exemption fdr wetlands. It is still my opinion that the area you are concerned about would
clearly fall into at least a, "seasonal wetland," complex classification and thus be exempt per our
Code.
In fact, you have included with your correspondence a copy of material derived from city files —
a so -called summary report of the 1994 water quality monitoring efforts undertaken by Ramsey
County. On page one of that report, in the; "site information," portion, the County describes the
compost site as being adjacent to a, "partially-drained/ditched palustrine emergent wetland with
water regime temporarily flooded."
5letten Correspondence
August. 10, 200T
Page 2
This supports my proposition that the trees you refer to are, in fact, part of a seasonal wetland
and I therefore continue to assert my previous position regarding the situate of the trees and the
areas general, "exempt," status under our City Code. And to correct your assertion in your.
correspondence, ..l don't believe I ever regarded the City as being, "exempt," as you write on page
three of your July 26 2007 letter, I indicated that ' l regarded the site as being exempt for that
purpose.
Your other concern, as indicated in you August 5, 2007 correspondence, is over a property
owned by Xcel that has some debris and other materials on it. The City has been in contact with
Xcel and is investigating your complaint. When our inquiry is complete you will be informed of
What we discover.
Yours very truly,
L H Oeod ntrud '
�, City Attorney
Eno
cc: Greg Copeland
City Council
Tom Grundhoefer
DuWayne Konewko
Chris Soutter
Environmental & Natural Resources Commission
Stanley Hubbard
Pierre Regnier
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Community Development Director
SUBJECT Conditional Use Permit -- Yard Waste Transfer Site
LOCATION: Beam Avenue, west of Hazelwood Street
DATE: May 22, 2000
INTRODUCTION
City staff recently received a petition requesting that the city council hold a public information
hearing about the conditional use permit (CUP) for the Ramsey County yard waste transfer site.
(See the petition on page three.) This site is on Beam Avenue, west of Hazelwood Street.
BACKGROUND
May 9, 1994: The city council reviewed and amended the CUP for the Ramsey County compost
site.
August 8, 1994: The city council accepted a report from the county about the compost site. The
council directed the county to continue researching conditions and techniques for compost site
operations.
August 14, 1995: The city council extended the CUP for one year and amended Condition 14 to
require that the county submit a status report to the city on a yearly basis regarding the compost
site.
August 9, 1996: The city council reviewed the permit and listened to neighborhood residents'
concerns with the compost site. A motion was made and seconded to reduce the size of the
compost to 10,000 cubic yards. This motion resulted in a split vote -2 nays and 2 ayes (Mayor
Bastian was absent). The council then tabled this item for two weeks to allow for full council
consideration.
On October 14, 1996, the city approved a revision to the conditional use permit for the Ramsey
County Compost Site, making the site subject to 17 conditions. The conditions of this approval
included not allowing composting or yard waste management on the site after the spring of 1997
and allowing the County to make some improvements to the site. (See the minutes starting on
page 4.) These changes made the operation only a yard waste transfer site, not a compost site.
At the November 13, 1998, city council meeting, Mr. Bob Zick spoke under the visitor
presentation part of the meeting about the Ramsey County Compost Site. He had several
concerns about possible violations at the site. After Mr. Zick spoke, staff reviewed the procedures
and conditions of operation for the yard waste site and found that there were no violations at the
site.
On December 27, 1999, the city council again considered a review of the Ramsey County Yard
Waste transfer site. At that meeting, the mayor made a motion to set a public hearing to review
or possibly change the CUP for the site, but the motion died for a lack of a second. As such, the
council took no action on the site.
DISCUSSION
Site Operations
It was a relatively quiet year in 1999 for the yard waste transfer site on Beam Avenue. City staff
received one complaint late last summer about inadequate collections of grass clippings. The
complainant indicated that the County's hauler was not picking up materials the required three
times a week. Staff checked out the complaint and found that the hauler had made a
determination not to pick up all three days because there was not enough material at the site to
make a full truck load. According to the County, this happened five times in the months of June,
July and August.
After Ramsey county officials found out about this, they notified the hauler to make the required
pick ups regardless of the amount of material on the site or the cost to the County. It is the
understanding of staff that the county has resolved this operational issue. City staff did not see
this complaint meeting our standards for initiating enforcement of a violation. Staff saw this as a
fiscal and fairness issue between maintaining a public facility that benefits the overall community,
against the fact that the amount of yard waste found at the site was so insignificant that it would
be a waste of city and county resources to pursue this further.
With the exception of the above - mentioned incident, the County is meeting all the conditions that
the city set for the site in 1996. Neither the city staff nor county staff is proposing any changes to
the site or to the site operation.
In July 1999, the Saint Paul- Ramsey County Department of Public Health sent a letter to
Maplewood residents explaining some of the history and recent activities of the Beam Avenue
yard waste site. I have included a copy of their letter (starting on page seven) for your
information. This letter acknowledges that several nearby residents have sued Ramsey County.
This lawsuit against the County is proceeding, however, the suit against Maplewood has been
dismissed. (See the article from the October 1999 Minnesota Cities magazine on page 11.)
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit (CUP) for the Ramsey County Yard Waste Site on Beam
Avenue and direct staff to work with Ramsey County to make changes to the site or to the site
operations as the council deems necessary.
p:sec3lcom post4. mem
Attachments:
1. Neighbors Petition
2, 10 -14 -96 Council minutes
3. 7 -22 -99 Health Department letter
4. October 1999 Minnesota Cities magazine, page 18
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 7:00 P.M. (7:05) Ramsey County Yard Waste Transfer Site Conditional Use Permit Review (Beam
Avenue)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
c. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings.
d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents.
The following persons were heard:
Zack Hansen, Goodhue County, Applicant
Ron Brzinski, 1358 Kohlman Avenue
Greg Bleaser, 2670 Barclay Street
Rita Blaeser, 2670 Barclay Street
Tim Wilson, 2664 Barclay Street
Mark Pick Peich, 2676 Barclay Street
Dave Mozs, 2658 Barclay Street
Rita Blaeser, second appearance
Ron Brzinski, second appearance
Greg Blaeser, second appearance
f Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Mayor Cardinal moved to terminate, effective immediately, the conditional use permit for the Ramsey County
Yard Waste Transfer Site on Beam Avenue for the following reasons: past operational problems including the
removal of materials, proximity to a hospital and health clinics, proximity to wetland, potential pollution in
pond, health concerns of nearby residents and inadequate buffer zone distance between residents and the
facili1y.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Collins and
Allenspach
Nays - Councilmembers Koppen and Wasiiuk
2, 7:10 P.M. Mogren Brothers Landscaping Conditional Use Permit Reconsideration (Behind (West
of) 2599 White Bear Avenue)
This item was removed from the Agenda at the applicant's request.
`1 - ZC.)O Gt7 CD C
/!] IVU7�S