The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007 02-26 City Council Packet5:00 p.m. Closed Session — Discuss Pending Litigation — Copar vs City of Maplewood 6:00 p.m. Closed Session — Discuss Pending Litigation — Banick vs City of Maplewood AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, February 26 2007 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 07-4 B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Acknowledgement of Maplewood Residents Serving the Country Mayor's Address on Protocol: "Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council, It is our desire to keep all discussions civil as we work through difficult issues tonight If you are here for a Public Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with the Policies and Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. When you address the council, please state your name and address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and Council. I then will direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments. " D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes from the February 12, 2007 Council/Manager Workshop 5 p.m. 2. Minutes from the February 12, 2007 Council/Manager Workshop 6 p.m. 3. Minutes from the February 12, 2007 City Council Meeting F. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Approve new appointment to TH 49 (Rice Street) Task Force from Planning Commission H. PUBLIC HEARINGS CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Claims 2. Carry Over of 2006 Appropriations to 2007 3. Approval to Pay for Street Light Repair 4. Application for Use Deed — (SE corner of English Street and County Road B) 5. Conditional Use Permit Review — Maplewood Toyota (2973 Maplewood Drive North) 6. Conditional Use Permit Review— Menards (2280 Maplewood Drive North) 7. Employee Safety Training — On-call Service Agreement 8. Turnout coat and pant replacement purchase — Fire Department 9. Approval of 2007 Street Striping All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. J. AWARD OF BIDS K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Desoto Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06-16, Report on Existing Street Conditions and Proposed Improvements 2. Kenwood Area Street Improvements, City Project 05-16, Approval of Budget Adjustments and Project Overruns 3. County Road D East Improvements (TH 61 to Southlawn), City Project 02-07, Approval of Revised Purchase Agreement (Xcel Parcel) and Budget Adjustments 4. County Road D West Improvements (TH 61 to High Ridge Court), City Project 02-08, Approval of Budget Adjustments L. NEW BUSINESS 1. Heights Avenue Cul-de-Sac, City Project 07-06, Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Feasibility Study on Making Temporary Cul-de-Sac Permanent 2. Rainbow/ Mapleridge Driveway Reconstruction, City Project 07-03, Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Feasibility Study 3. Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Act Grant Agreement (Gladstone Redevelopment) 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Gladstone Redevelopment Plan ( English Street and Frost Avenue Area) Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 249-2001 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability. Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language. Agenda Item El MINUTES COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP 5:00 p.m. Monday, February 12, 2007 Council Chambers, City Hall • [ex•N A workshop of the City Council was held in the Council Cham to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Longrie. B. ROLL CALL Diana Longrie, Mayor Rebecca Cave Councilmember Erik Hjelle, Councilmember Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Will Rossbach, Councilmember C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Longrie moved to approve the a Seconded by Councilmember Cave D. NEW BUSINESS at City Hall and was called F -11 1. Firefiqhter Relief Association raid, president of thi and Ed Dietz, gave Ed Dietz, treasurer of the Ass( E. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Longrie adjourned at 6:43 p.m. irefighter Relief Association, along with firefighters Jon aresentation to the council regarding the Association. iation, gave further specifics of the report. February 12, 2007 City Council Workshop Agenda Item E2 MINUTES COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP 6:00 p.m. Monday, February 12, 2007 Council Chambers, City Hall A workshop of the City Council was held in the Council Cham to order at 6:45 p.m. by Mayor Longrie. B. ROLL CALL Diana Longrie, Mayor Present Rebecca Cave Councilmember Present Erik Hjelle, Councilmember Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present Hall and was called D. 1. Ballot for Commission Appointments D.2. Gethsemane Senior Housing Presentation on TIF Councilmember Cave moved to approve the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Ballot for Commission Appointments The Council completed balloting for the Community Design Review Board and the Parks and Recreation Commission Gethsemane Senior Housina Presentation on TIF Bob Van Slyke, project manager for Senior Housing Partners, addressed the council regarding a proposed senior housing project. Ward Isaacson, architect for the project, addressed the council. Jerry Moran of Gethsemane Lutheran Church spoke regarding this proposed project. E. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Longrie adjourned at 7:02 p.m. February 12, 2007 City Council Workshop Agenda Item E3 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. Monday, February 12, 2007 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 07-03 A. CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order at 7:11 p.m. by Mayor Longrie. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL Diana Longrie, Mayor Present Rebecca Cave Councilmember Present Erik Hjelle, Councilmember Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA GA. Public Safety Drugs Seminar G.5. Community Design Review Board Apt G.6. Parks & Recreation Commission App( G.7. Planning Commission Appointments M.2. Council Retreat M.3. Updated Research Regarding Wind E MA. Letter from Minnesota League of Citie N.1. Police Civil Service Commission Seconded by Mayor Longrie Ayes-all E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes from the January 8, 2007 City Council Meeting Mayor Longrie moved to approve the minutes of January 8, 2007 as corrected. Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-all 2. Minutes from the January 22, 2007 5:00 p.m. Council/Manager Workshop Mayor Longrie moved to approve the minutes of January 22, 2007 5:00 p.m. as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-all February 12, 2007 City Council Meeting 3. Minutes from the January 22, 2007 6:00 p.m. Council/Manager Workshop MoyorLon0he moved to approve the minutes of January 22, 2007 6:00 p.m. as submitted. Seconded bvCoUnCi|nnennb9rH�el|e U 4. Minutes from the January 22, 2007 City Council Meeting Councilmember Cave Seconded bvCoUnci|memb8rHjel|e A Jamie Jensen, o developer, spoke regarding the south Maplewood development moratorium. 2. /\OnGBrOdt 2513 Adele Street, spoke regarding the hockey ice rink located across the street from her home. 3. Bill MaySe�G40881 ' Avenue North, Brooklyn Park addressed the council r th8 Woodhill development property. 4. Nancy Lazaryan, 1O734 West Lake Road, Rice iUd9v8k}pn1Rnt 5. Ron COSkhe|.943 Century Avenue, spoke supporting the south Maplewood moratorium and in support of bringing in an outside facilitator to assist with this process. 8. John Nephew, 028 County Road B East, spoke in support Of the south Maplewood moratorium and bringing in an outside facilitator. 7. Michelle Bailey thanked the council for having the council/manager workshop at the fire station VnLonUiDLane. 8. Ron [}0ckhe| again spoke bJ clarify his previous comments regarding bringing in8noutside facilitator fo assist with the nlor8L0riUrn process. 8. George Gonzales thanked the council for the moratorium and the meeting at the fire station and supported the request for an outside facilitator to assist with the process. 10. John Nephew spoke regarding the request for a facilitator in the south Maplewood moratorium process and requested this b88"teChniCG| 11. Joe Bailey, 1O15 Sterling Street South, thanked the council for listening to citizens' requests. 12. Bob SChnlidt, 1439 Burke Avenue East, spoke regarding the K8op|evvOod Community Center revenues. 13. Richard Currie and Ron COCkre[1837 K8nvvo0d Drive West presented information onthe city's planned 50 year anniversary. 14. Dave Schilling, 1975Gr8enbrkar spoke concerning the city's reorganization process, city- paid employee education benefits and city supervisory employee unions. 2 February 12, 2007 City Council Meeting 15. Mike Klein, 1778 Desoto Street, presented his concerns regarding a city street project which includes sidewalks and curb redevelopment in his neighborhood. 10 16. Dave Hafner, 1037 Marnie Street, spoke regarding the Mayor's Forum. 17. Bob Monette, 1996 Kingston, spoke regarding his disgust with the city's current political turmoil and suggested that the city will lose developers and opportunities because of this. ..9 1 1 11 • A • 1. Resolution of Appreciation — Mary Dierich a. Planner Roberts presented the report. Mayor Longrie moved approval of the following resolution of appreciation for Mary Dierich for her years of service on the Planning Commission: RESOLUTION 07-02-013 JOINT RESOL UTION OF APPRECIA WHEREAS, Mary Dierich has been a member of the Maplewood Planning Commission since December 11, 2000, and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has appreciated her experience, insights and good judgment and WHEREAS, she has freely given of her time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment of the Citv of Maplewood: and WHEREAS, she has shown sincere dedication to her duties and has consistently contributed her leadership, time and effort for the benefit of the City. OW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of ad, Minnesota, and its citizens, that Mary Dierich is hereby extended our heartfelt and appreciation for her dedicated service, and we wish her continued success in Passed by the � City Council on Diana Longrie, Mayor Passed by the Maplewoc Planning Commission on Attest: Lorraine Fischer, Chairperson Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk Seconded by Councilmember Cave February 12, 2007 City Council Meeting Ayes-all 3 a. Hn3 Chi8fLukin presented KUc Bade with 8 plaque of appreciation for his 51 years of volunteer service to the City of Maplewood. 3. Community Center — Events Update G. Citizen Services Director GViUoi|8 gave a presentation Vf recent events held Gtthe Maplewood Community Center and reported on the Shiverfest event held at Hazelwood Park. 4. Public Safety [)[ugS SS[niDGr a. Mayor Longrie presented information on a free seminar on a kids and drugs seminar presented by Carol Felkowski of Hazelton Foundation to be held at the Maplewood Community Center On Thursday, February 22 from 7-9p.m. 5. CO00Unih/ [}RSigD Review Board Appointments a. Mayor Longrie informed the council that the review board applicant interviews and balloting has been completed. Mayor Longrie moved appointment of Matt Ledvina, Linda Olson and Matt Wise to the Maplewood Community Design Review Board. Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-all a. Mayor Longrie reported applicant interviews and balloting has been completed. Longrie moved appointment of Bruce Roman and Kim Schmidt to the Parks and Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-all 7, Planning Commission Appointments a, Mayor LonQh8 reported applicant interviews and balloting has been completed. K8ayorLonQria moved appointment of Dale Triggler, Harlan Hess and josej)h Walton to the Planning Commission. Seconded bVCounCi|nnennb8rCave Ayes-all None Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt consent agenda items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9 and 10. February 12, 2007 City Council Meeting El Seconded bvCoUn[i|m8mb8rHe||8 Ayes-al Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt consent agenda item 5. Seconded bv Mayor LVnQh8 Ayes-al Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt consent agenda item 8. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-all AoDr0v@| of Claims ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 340/479.55 Checks # 71884thnJ#7 dated 01/12/07 thru 01/2 $ 339 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 01/18/07thru 0 1/25@07�. $ 873 dated 01/24/07 thru 01/30/07 $ 135,209.82 Disbursements via debits tu check account dated 01/18/07Lhru 01/25/07 $ 308 Checks #71088thrU#72O13 dated 01/28/07thru 02/00/07 8 3,848'607.24 Disbursements via debits h3 checking account dated 01/26/07thru 02/01/07 $ 5.445.253.03 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $ 655 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated U1/20/2007 $ 2 Payroll Deduction check #1U01153UlnJ#1UO1155 dated 01/26/2007 $ 058.115.81 Total Payro 5 February 12, 2007 City Council Meeting 2. 0 � 01 TnanofenyfnonnTox|nonarnnnLFunds — FinanonDeportnlent Authorized the appropriate 2O08 budget adjustments and 20U8 transfers totaling $31O from the Tax Increment Funds to the Debt Service Fund. 8vvOOdOf Maplewood, City P 00-O8 the City of Saint Paul Private Water Main Agreement Approved the private water main agreement between Lauren & Company Development, LTD, the City Of K88p|8vvond and the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul. Update OD Sump Pump Inspection Program: Requesting Approval h3 Issue Final Letter Assessing Surcharge and Establishing 8 Policy for Handling FUtUn8 Non-Compliant Properties Authorized staff to send out a final notification letter requiring these property owners to achieve compliance with the "Ordinance Prohibiting the Discharge Of Clear Water into the K8UDiCipo| Sanitary S9vv8[ 8vot*Ol" by June 1, 2007. Failure h3 CO[np|y will result in @ surcharge 0f$1UO.U0 per month for single-family properties and $5OO.00 per month for all Other properties per ordinance requirement, Section 6.-SurChar08. Staff is also authorized from council k)provide final notification in the third mailing in the subsequent years Vfthis project. White Bear Avenue Improvements |e\. City Project U2-21: Approve Joint Powers Agreement with Ramsey County Services Approved the Joint Powers Agreement with Ramsey County in the amount of $50,000 of Municipal State Aid Street Funds (MSAS) for the improvement of White Bear Avenue between Radatz and Buerkle Road, Project 02-21, and authorized the Mayor and City Manager to sign said agreement. Vehicle and Equipment Purchase — Public Works Approval to enter into the following contracts: State Contract 436607 with Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet for the purchase of two i2\2O07 1 /2 ton pickup trucks for $36,187.98. Contract 436938 with TUrhw8rks for the purchase Cf one /1\2OO8 Jacobsen HR9U10 )0vv8r for $53,242.55. 7 Fina n Addition Approved the final plat for the Carm renAddition.sVbj8ct to compliance with the pF8|iQDiDGry o|Gt r8qUiF8[n8Ots, GU of which [nUSt be met to the satisfaction of the city engineer before the signing Ofthe plat documents. 8. Conditional Use Permit Review —8Ch|0Onk@Landscaping Extended the two conditional use permits associated with Schkmka Landscaping located at 2511 Carver Avenue again in one year to ensure continued compliance with all conditions. February 12, 2007 City Council Meeting R 9. Purchase of New Vehicles for Police Department Authorization to purchase four 2007 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor squad cars and one Ford Expedition. 10. Gang Strike Force Grant Approval — Police Department Approved the grant agreement. J. AWARD OF BIDS None K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1 Saint Clair Hills Development — Findings of Fact G. Moratorium Variance U. Rezoning l> Planner Roberts presented the report K8Gy0rLVngriS moved adoption of findings of fact for the requested moratorium varianc A. The city council denied the moratorium variance request because: 1 Strict --_'_,-_-__-- hardship to the property or to the property owner. The applicant knew the property in question was zoned R-1(R) (which limits the type of development possible on the property) when he purchased it and that the property could be subject to a moratorium when he made application to the city. _ There are no special circumstances _ or conditions in this ---- that warrant the city approving 8 variance k) the moratorium. 3. The proposed rezoning (and then the proposed subdivision) would be premature and would not be compatible with the R-1 (R) zoning designation. 4. The proposed rezoning and subdivision would not meet the spirit and intent of the moratorium ordinance. This iS because the city put the moratorium ordinance in place to study land use and zoning patterns in this area (among other things). The proposed variance would remove the subject property from the study and thus from any possible changes that the city decides to make to the land use and zoning designations 8S8 part Of the study. B. The city council denied the proposed zoning map change because: The request does not meet all the criteria required by the city for a zoning map change. This iG because the city cannot determine if the proposed zoning change would have any negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities. 7 February 12, 2007 City Council Meeting 2. Staff recommended that the city not grant the variance to the moratorium. The morator prohibits the city from considering rezoning 0rdevelopment requests, unless the city approves a variance to the moratorium. 3. The proposed rezoning was not consistent with the R-1(R) zoning that the city intended to use to preserve the semi-rural lifestyle and tominimize tract housing. The city expects the R-1 (R) zoning and any development consistent with that zoning t0 have lots 8t least two acres in size and t0 have wells and individual septic sysL8nnS (not using city sewer and water) The d plan aS shown by the applicant for the rezoning consistent with the R-1(F<) zoning as it showed 10.800-square-fVOL lots and the use of city water and sewer t0 serve the new lots. Seconded bvCoUn[i|m8mb8rHe||8 2. Conditional Use Permit Update -VVoOdhiU 8. Planner Roberts presented the b. Cou of the property owner, subsequent involuntary bankruptcy of the property owner's companies, and issues with completing the development of this project. Councilmember Hjelle moved to review the conditional use permit for Woodhill again in June 2007. Seconded bvCOuOci|rne[DbmrCave U � NEW BUSINESS 1. Desoto Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06-16, O8sotVStreet Sidewalk Decision 8. Public Works Director AN presented the report. b. Dick [)Vfr8Sne. 1721 [}eSOt0 Stneet, on area resident addressed the council. C. Mike Klein, 1778 Desoto 5tn]8t, an area resident addressed the council. d. Dick Dufresne of 1771 Desoto Street addressed the council once again. {|ounci|nlepnb8rRosSb8ch moved to table their decision on building the sidewalk on Desoto Street until the March 12 meeting. Seconded by CoVnni|[Mennb8rJV8n8nn8nn Ayes-all 2. 800 MHz Subscriber Agreement a. Hn3 ChiefLu|dn presented the naoorL b. City Manager Copeland explained that capital notes could pOSSibk/ be SO|d to partially fund this project 8ndthe operations fees could possibly b8 funded from the general fund. 8 February 12, 2007 City Council Meeting Councilmember Hjelle moved to authorize the expenditures of $283,123.87 and have staff research funding options and that the city council enter into a Countywide Public Safety Radio Communications Subsystem Subscriber Agreement bV siqning the Agreement. Al Z I Seconded bvCoVnC|nnemU8rCave U 3. Planning Commission's 2006 Annual Report G. Planner Roberts presented the report. b. Planning Commissioner Tushar Desai, 2973 Edward Street, addressed the council. C. City Manager Copeland commented on the multitude and variety of issues the commission reviewed during the year. K8oynrLongrie moved to accept the Planning Commission's 2006 Annual Report. Seconded by[}OunCi|nnennberJueneno8Dn AveS-o|| COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. K88p|evvOOd Review — Erik Hhe||e ^ CounC|nlenlb8rHUEA|erep incorrect stories and facts 91 0 Council Retreat consider a different fo discussion by Friday, the fire station. Mayor Longrie shared efficient by using wind several seminars on ti venture with Ramsev requesie 'nat such ry 18, and then set o Thursday date for the retreat tOb8 held 8t x he has filed 8K8inneooL8 N8vx8 Council CVnlp|8ini due to led in the Maplewood Review. d the council set a date for the council retreat and possibly as a roundtable discussion. It was agreed to submit ideas for ormation that she has attended seminars on becoming more energy - bines to generate electricity. Mayor Longrie said she has attended topic and that it may be possible in the future to establish a joint inty; she also reported that she has been appointed to the National Environment and Natural Resources Policy Committee. Ue of Cities 2. N ISTRATIVE NS City Manager Copeland distributed information to the council on the police Civil Service Commission applicant interviews and asked if the council wanted to accept further applications. It was decided this commission opening would be placed on the March 12 agenda for appointment. City Mana ~~~~ Copeland distributed o memo from City Attorney K@ntnJd exp that the city paid James Kayser and Evelyn Wallace $575,U00 for the App|8vv0od Park property. Mayor Longrie adjourned the meeting at 10:02 p.m. February 12, 2007 City Council Meeting � A-enda Item G1 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: CharleS/\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Appointment to Rice Street Corridor Study Task Force Planning Commission Member DATE: February 16, 2007 Ramsey County has convened 8 Task Force to study the needed improvements to Rice Street from south OfTH38iD Maplewood tO north Of County Road JiO Lino Lakes. The roadway was formerly Trunk Highway 49 and has been conveyed tO Ramsey County from K8n0C)T. The Council appointed four members 0n December 18,2O08to the Task Force. Michael Grover has resigned from the Planning Commission and ia unable to serve 0n this Task Force. A new member from the Planning Commission should b9appointed. The Planning Commission met On February 20.2OO7. and Dale Tripp|8rhas previously expressed interested in serving on this Task Force, although Mr. Trippler was not at the Commission meeting and final confirmation of his willingness to serve cannot occur until his return from vacation 0n February 28th. The Council appointed the following members to the Task Force on December 18th: 1. A business representative from the corridor: Ernie Schroeder from Schroeder Milk 2. /\ community representative: Michael Grover @ member Of the Planning Commission 3. /\ council member: K8LhyJV8n8nnann 4. A staff member: City Engineer Chuck Ah| Background The Rice Street corridor from south of TH 36 to north of County Road J is a congested arterial that handles |8FgS vO|UnnRS of traffic, 8Sp9Ci8||y in the PM peak pSh0dS due to the [nix of commuters and retail 8sL8b|iShnnHntG that use F(it8 Street for access. K8Gp|evvood's biggest concern in the corridor is the congestion at the Rice Street -lH30 interchange /bridge. Maplewood has some large traffic generators 8t this location in Cub Foods and Schroeder Milk. {)n the north side of County Road BatRice Street, St. Jude Medical (in Little Canada) has recently expanded the facility and is looking to expand their campus again in the near future. This has the potential tO add Upt040O additional employees tO the 05O jobs 8t their two Little Canada sites. Little Canada and Ramsey C0Vnh/ are working on moving the TH 38 - Rice Street interchange forward for improvement since MnDOT has no plans for an upgrade until the 2025+ time frame. These improvements, along with the remainder of the corridor, will be the subject of the Task Force. his recommended that the city council appoint Dale Tripplerfrom the Planning Commission to the Rice Street Corridor Task Force. AGENDA NO. 1-1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: February 26, 2007 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 220,175.95 Checks # 72014 thru # 72053 dated 02/13/07 $ 119,604.84 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 02/02/07 thru 02/08/07 $ 113,186.80 Checks # 72054 thru # 72122 dated 02/15/07 thru 02/20/07 $ 277,145.96 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 02/09/07 thru 02/15/07 $ 730,113.55 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $ 285,690.77 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 02/09/07 $ 3,175.84 Payroll Deduction check# 1001292 thru # 1001295 dated 02/09/07 $ 288,866.61 Total Payroll $ 1,018,980.16 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651-249-2903 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if ds attachments S:\CTY Lists and Reports 2007\Agenda Reports\02-26-07\1 1 Approval of Claims Check Register City of Maplewood 02/0912007 Check Date Vendor 72014 0211312007 03576 EUREKA RECYCLING 72015 0211312007 00687 HUGO'S TREE CARE INC 72016 02113/2007 02728 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 0211312007 02728 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 0211312007 02728 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 0211312007 02728 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 72017 0211312007 01018 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT 72018 0211312007 01504 CITY OF ST PAUL 0211312007 01504 CITY OF ST PAUL 72019 0211312007 01546 SUBURBAN SPORTSWEAR LLC 72020 0210912007 03822 ROCK ISLE FARMS 72021 0211312007 01809 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES NCR INC 72022 0211312007 00116 APPEARANCE PLUS CAR WASH 72023 0211312007 03824 ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0211312007 03824 ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 72024 0211312007 00173 TIM BELDEN 72025 0211312007 00240 C.S.G. CREDIT SERVICES 72026 0211312007 03823 CB MAPLERIDGE, INC. 72027 0211312007 02789 COMCAST CABLE COMM INC 72028 0211312007 03726 MARY CURRY 72029 0211312007 00358 DGM INC. 0211312007 00358 DGM INC. 0211312007 00358 DGM INC. 0211312007 00358 DGM INC. 0211312007 00358 DGM INC. 0211312007 00358 DGM INC. 0211312007 00358 DGM INC. 0211312007 00358 DGM INC. 0211312007 00358 DGM INC. 0211312007 00358 DGM INC. 72030 0211312007 00668 STEVEN HIEBERT 72031 0211312007 03597 MARY JO HOFMEISTER 72032 0211312007 00483 IDEACOM MID - AMERICA 72033 0211312007 00721 INDEPENDENT SPORTS NETWORK 72034 0211312007 03729 KNAAK & KANTRUD PA 0211312007 03729 KNAAK & KANTRUD PA 72035 0211312007 00827 L M C I T 0211312007 00827 L M C I T 72036 0211312007 00393 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 0211312007 00393 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 72037 0211312007 03756 DIANA LONGRIE 72038 0211312007 01035 MN CHAPTER IAAI 72039 0211312007 01156 JEAN NELSON 72040 0211312007 03785 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO, INC 72041 0211312007 01213 JULIE OLSON 72042 0211312007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 72043 0211312007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 72044 0211312007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 72045 0211312007 03709 MANDY PALANK 72046 0211312007 01359 REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL XX 72047 0211312007 03398 SHAMROCK GROUP 72048 0211312007 03278 SKRYPEK'S DAIRY QUEEN 72049 0211312007 01489 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC. 72050 0211312007 03650 STREICH- DEMARS INC 72051 0211312007 03626 TRI- COUNTY ASSN 72052 0211312007 01699 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 0211312007 01699 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 72053 0211312007 01750 THE WATSON CO INC 40 Checks in this report. Description RECYCLING - JAN TREE TRIMMING PROJ 06 -17 PROF SRVS THRU 12130 PROJ 06 -16 PROF SRVS THRU 12130 PROJ 04 -21 PROF SRVS THRU 12130 PROD 06 -10 PROF SRVS THRU 12130 AUTO PAWN SYSTEM FEE - DEC PROJ 06 -10 COTTAGEWOOD CRIME LAB SERVICES - JAN STAFF SHIRTS/EVENT HATS SLEIGH RIDE FEE WINTER SAND CAR WASHES - JAN MONTHLY PREMIUM - JAN MONTHLY PREMIUM - FEB PIANO PLAYER AT BRIDAL FAIR APPLICATION BACKGROUND CHECKS ESCROW REFUND MAPLERIDGE INTERNET CHARGES WATER FITNESS PRESENTATION TOW VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW ANTIQUE FIRE TRUCK TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW VEHICLE TOW VEHICLE REIMS FOR EYEGLASSES REIMB FOR MILEAGE 12128 - 01118 PHONE SYSTEM RESET YOUTH BASKETBALL OFFICIALS - JAN LEGAL SERVICES - JAN PROSECUTION SERVICES - JAN CLAIM DEDUCTIBLE #11058675 CLAIM DEDUCTIBLE #11046094 MONTHLY SURTAX- JAN CC SURTAX - DEC REIMB- MILEAGE,INT,MISC 10/31-12/30 CONFERENCE REGISTRATIONS REIMB FOR MILEAGE 111 - 1131 PROJ 06 -10 COTTAGEWOOD PMT #3 REIMB FOR SHOES 214 REFUND M SPARISH - BANQUET ROOM REFUND E OZURUMBA - BIRTHDAY REFUND CITY VIEW ELECTRIC BL -06- REIMB FOR MILEAGE 114 CAR WASHES - JAN MDSE FOR RESALE BIRTHDAY PROGRAM CAKES PROGRAM SUPPLIES TRAINING MEMBERSHIP DUES CLASS REGISTRATION - STORMWATER CLASS REGISTRATION - SEWAGE MDSE FOR RESALE Amount 19, 383.89 106.50 29,911.82 21,680.93 1,661.56 304.76 429.00 14,125.39 525.00 294.00 700.00 2,562.74 125.67 9,623.75 9,623.75 250.00 50.00 45,210.68 42.95 200.00 154.43 143.78 111.83 106.50 90.53 90.53 90.53 90.53 53.25 53.25 208.08 14.52 137.00 1,539.00 8,250.00 8,250.00 2,886.68 779.25 1,473.81 -0.98 362.63 415.00 28.52 34,696.69 85.00 300.00 167.74 160.50 4.37 109.59 121.00 356.75 397.75 875.00 60.00 310.00 200.00 190.50 zzu. i 15.a5 2 CITY OFMAPLBW00D Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee Description Amount 02/01/07 02/02/07 MN State Treasurer DriversLicense/Deputy Registrar 15.670.75 02X01/07 02/02/07 Discover Credit Card fees 170.68 02/01/07 02/02/07 K4N Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 1.638.50 02/02/07 02/05/07 MN State Treasurer Drivers Lioense/DeputyRegistrer 12.170.07 02/05/07 02/00/07 MN State Treasurer Drivers Licenne/DeputyRegistrmr 25.171.95 02/00/07 02107/07 MN State Treasurer Dhwarn Lioenne/DeputyRegishnr 14 02/02/07 02/07/07 US Bank VISA One Card* Purchasing card items 42,827.14 02/07/07 02/08/07 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/DeputyRegietrar 7.735.75 TOTAL 11960484 *Detailed listing of VISA purchases isattached. 9 Visa Transactions 1 -20 -07 to 2 -2 -07 Trans Date Posting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 01/18/07 01/22/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $30.67 JIM BEHAN 01/19/07 01/22/07 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS $66.32 JIM BEHAN 01/19/07 01/23/07 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLO $89.46 JIM BEHAN 01/22/07 01/23/07 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $15.09 JIM BEHAN 01/23/07 01/24/07 ELECTRIC MOTOR REAPIR $301.85 JIM BEHAN 01/23/07 01/25/07 SPRINT -STORE #2430 $37.43 JIM BEHAN 01/24/07 01/26/07 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE $76.39 JIM BEHAN 01/24/07 01/26/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $13.73 JIM BEHAN 01/25/07 01/26/07 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER $508.92 JIM BEHAN 01/30/07 01/31/07 EXTRACTOR CORPORATI $537.00 JIM BEHAN 01/30/07 02/01/07 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLO $118.48 JIM BEHAN 01/30/07 02/01/07 SIMPLEX GRINNELL WEB P $499.25 JIM BEHAN 01/31/07 02/01/07 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER $182.24 JIM BEHAN 01/31/07 02/02/07 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE $20.77 JIM BEHAN 01/22/07 01/23/07 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI $384.24 JOSEPH BERGERON 01/18/07 01/22/07 YOCUM OIL CO $47.99 RON BOURQUIN 01/18/07 01/22/07 MENARDS 3059 $10.15 TROY BRINK 01/31/07 02/01/07 MENARDS 3059 $28.95 TROY BRINK 01/24/07 01/25/07 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 ($59.64) HEIDI CAREY 01/24/07 01/25/07 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $59.64 HEIDI CAREY 01/24/07 01/25/07 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $361.12 HEIDI CAREY 01/25/07 01/26/07 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $41.75 HEIDI CAREY 01/25/07 01/26/07 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $404.59 HEIDI CAREY 01/26/07 01/29/07 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $206.34 HEIDI CAREY 01/31/07 02/01/07 FACTORY CARD OUTLET #284 $15.75 HEIDI CAREY 02/01/07 02/02/07 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $41.75 HEIDI CAREY 02/01/07 02/02/07 FONTS.COM $24.00 HEIDI CAREY 01/22/07 01/23/07 COUNTRY KITCHEN OF DUL $7.61 KERRY CROTTY 01/23/07 01/25/07 WENDY'S #2 Q25 $7.52 KERRY CROTTY 01/23/07 01/25/07 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE $22.75 KERRY CROTTY 01/23/07 01/26/07 ECONOLODGE $149.78 KERRY CROTTY 01/25/07 01/29/07 STREICHERS INC $585.16 KERRY GROTTY 01/18/07 01/22/07 BIRD HOUSE TOO $15.98 CHARLES DEAVER 01/18/07 01/22/07 RYCO SUPPLY COMPANY $17.83 CHARLES DEAVER 01/26/07 01/29/07 FRATTALLONE'S ACE HDWE $9.54 CHARLES DEAVER 01/26/07 01/29/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $5.73 CHARLES DEAVER 01/18/07 01/22/07 MENARDS 3059 $35.91 THOMAS DEBILZAN 01/30/07 01/31/07 MENARDS 3059 $12.73 THOMAS DEBILZAN 01/30/07 02/01/07 OXYGEN SERVICE CO INC $770.29 THOMAS DEBILZAN 01/31/07 02/01/07 ICI- DULUX- PAINTS #0092 $198.26 DOUG EDGE 01/25/07 01/29/07 OFFICE MAX $94.70 THOMAS G EKSTRAND 01/29/07 01/30/07 CUB FOODS, INC. $120.60 THOMAS G EKSTRAND 01/19/07 01/22/07 RADIO SHACK 00161455 $115.55 LARRY FARR 01/22/07 01/24/07 RADIO SHACK 00161455 $91.53 LARRY FARR 01/23/07 01/24/07 CINTAS FIRST AID #431 $53.75 LARRY FARR 01/24/07 01/25/07 ADAMS PEST CONTROL $321.74 LARRY FARR 01/24/07 01/25/07 ADAMS PEST CONTROL $531.97 LARRY FARR 01/24/07 01/25/07 ADAMS PEST CONTROL $193.04 LARRY FARR 01/24/07 01/26/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $715.38 LARRY FARR 01/26/07 01/29/07 RADIO SHACK 00161455 $10.64 LARRY FARR 01/29/07 01/31/07 RADIO SHACK 00161455 ($10.64) LARRY FARR 01/29/07 01/31/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $57.15 LARRY FARR 01/30/07 02/01/07 TWIN CITY HARDWARE HALE $125.57 LARRY FARR 01/31/07 02/01/07 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH $568.90 LARRY FARR 01/31/07 02/01/07 UNITED ELECTRIC #7649 $114.29 LARRY FARR 02/01/07 02/02/07 MENARDS 3059 $1,807.51 LARRY FARR Visa Transactions 1 -20 -07 to 2 -2 -07 Trans Date Posting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 01/23/07 01/25/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $42.54 MYCHAL FOWLDS 01/24/07 01/25/07 FEDEX SHP 01/23/07 AB# $13.83 MYCHAL FOWLDS 01/24/07 01/26/07 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY HA $865.00 MYCHAL FOWLDS 01/25/07 01/29/07 SPRINT PCS- 995 -SP WEB $113.50 MYCHAL FOWLDS 01/26/07 01/29/07 AT &T ARBOR /ESB $1,013.60 MYCHAL FOWLDS 01/26/07 01/29/07 PAYPAL INC $59.95 MYCHAL FOWLDS 01/28/07 01/29/07 HP DIRECT- PUBLICSECTOR $322.70 MYCHAL FOWLDS 01/30/07 02/01/07 OFFICE MAX $13.30 MYCHAL FOWLDS 01/31/07 02/01/07 AVENET LLC $20.00 MYCHAL FOWLDS 01/19/07 01/22/07 ROUTERSIM LLC $49.00 NICK FRANZEN 01/23/07 01/25/07 GOLDCOM 00 OF 00 $402.75 NICK FRANZEN 01/27/07 01/29/07 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTORS $274.67 NICK FRANZEN 02/01/07 02/02/07 TGT *TARGET.COM $70.46 PATRICIA FRY 01/19/07 01/22/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $23.41 VIRGINIA GAYNOR 01/30/07 02/01/07 GANDER MOUNTA100104802 $79.99 CLARENCE GERVAIS 01/19/07 01/22/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $345.73 JEAN GLASS 01/19/07 01/22/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $90.29 JEAN GLASS 01/31/07 02/01/07 CLOVER SUPER FOODS $13.14 MIKE GRAF 01/25/07 01/29/07 BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKLE $8.57 JANET M GREW HAYMAN 02/01/07 02/02/07 KNOWLANS #2 $8.75 JANET M GREW HAYMAN 01/24/07 01/26/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $27.30 KAREN E GUILFOILE 01/29/07 01/31/07 INT'L INST OF MUNI CLE $545.00 KAREN E GUILFOILE 01/29/07 01/31/07 AMTRAK INTER0291004260126 $297.90 KAREN E GUILFOILE 01/29/07 01/30/07 FASTENAL CO MO TO $12.79 MARK HAAG 01/30/07 02/01/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $12.68 MARK HAAG 01/30/07 02/01/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $72.85 LORI HANSON 02/01/07 02/02/07 COMCAST CABLE COMM $179.27 LORI HANSOM 01/19/07 01/22/07 MENARDS 3059 $424.15 PATRICK HEFFERNAN 01/26/07 01/29/07 MENARDS 3059 $8.51 PATRICK HEFFERNAN 01/31/07 02/02/07 7 CORNERS ACE HARDWARE $428.00 PATRICK HEFFERNAN 02/01/07 02/02/07 MENARDS 3059 $15.30 PATRICK HEFFERNAN 01/26/07 01/29/07 PSW *FRONTIER PRO SHOP $67.63 RON HORWATH 01/26/07 01/31/07 AMERICAN RED CROSS $25.00 RON HORWATH 01/30/07 01/31/07 SWIMOUTLET.COM $215.39 RON HORWATH 02/01/07 02/02/07 MEDCO SUPPLY $182.54 RON HORWATH 01/20/07 01/22/07 MISSISSIPPI MARKET $19.23 ANN E HUTCHINSON 01/20/07 01/22/07 HIST CTR MUSEUM STORE $20.79 ANN E HUTCHINSON 01/22/07 01/23/07 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $45.10 ANN E HUTCHINSON 01/23/07 01/25/07 NATURE -WATCH $28.00 ANN E HUTCHINSON 01/26/07 01/29/07 JERABEK'S NEW BOHEMIAN CO $55.00 ANN E HUTCHINSON 01/29/07 01/31/07 TARGET 00000687 $30.64 ANN E HUTCHINSON 01/18/07 01/22/07 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI $11.00 KEVIN JOHNSON 01/19/07 01/22/07 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI $6.00 KEVIN JOHNSON 01/19/07 01/22/07 SAMMYS PIZZA -DT DULUTH $11.00 KEVIN JOHNSON 01/20/07 01/22/07 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI $6.00 KEVIN JOHNSON 01/20/07 01/22/07 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI $11.00 KEVIN JOHNSON 01/21/07 01/22/07 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI $288.18 KEVIN JOHNSON 01/24/07 01/26/07 WOLF CAMERA #1530 $7.48 TOM KALKA 01/26/07 01/29/07 THE UPS STORE #2171 $14.50 TOM KALKA 01/18/07 01/22/07 GULDENS $200.00 LOIS KNUTSON 01/26/07 01/29/07 TARGET 00011858 $45.10 MARY B KOEHNEN 01/27/07 01/29/07 TJ T- SHIRTS $404.20 MARY B KOEHNEN 01/31/07 02/01/07 VZW APO CCVISIONNO $66.20 DUWAYNE KONEWKO 01/29/07 01/31/07 OFFICE DEPOT #375 $261.85 STEVEN KUMMER 01/26/07 01/29/07 U OF M CCE ON LINE $135.00 ERIN M LABEREE 01/26/07 01/29/07 NAPA AUTO PARTS # 28438 $22.87 DENNIS LINDORFF Visa Transactions 1 -20 -07 to 2 -2 -07 Trans Date Posting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 01/18/07 01/22/07 ASPEN MILLS 8005717343 $187.80 STEVE LUKIN 01/18/07 01/22/07 ASPEN MILLS 8005717343 $44.95 STEVE LUKIN 01/19/07 01/22/07 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC $70.29 STEVE LUKIN 01/19/07 01/22/07 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC $29.82 STEVE LUKIN 01/20/07 01/22/07 AMERICAN MESSAGING RECUR $17.74 STEVE LUKIN 01/22/07 01/24/07 CHILI'S GR122400002246 $28.20 STEVE LUKIN 01/24/07 01/25/07 AJ FORLITI PHOTOGRAPHY $1,165.65 STEVE LUKIN 02/01/07 02/02/07 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL $899.63 STEVE LUKIN 01/21/07 01/22/07 MENARDS 3059 $143.64 GORDON MALLORY 01/19/07 01/22/07 GOODYEAR AUTO SRV CT 6920 $44.00 DAN MARTIN 01/22/07 01/24/07 WOLF CAMERA #1530 $8.30 DAN MARTIN 01/23/07 01/26/07 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPL $11.20 MARK MARUSKA 01/23/07 01/26/07 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPL $18.30 MARK MARUSKA 01/25/07 01/29/07 CARQUEST 01021104 $33.03 MARK MARUSKA 01/31/07 02/01/07 METROCALL ARCH WIRE $47.76 ED NADEAU 01/23/07 01/24/07 CINTAS FIRST AID #431 $64.40 BRYAN NAGEL 01/30/07 02/01/07 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. $261.34 BRYAN NAGEL 01/22/07 01/23/07 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $37.69 JEAN NELSON 01/22/07 01/23/07 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $10.46 JEAN NELSON 01/22/07 01/23/07 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $165.23 JEAN NELSON 01/23/07 01/24/07 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $70.15 JEAN NELSON 01/18/07 01/22/07 CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03 $15.94 AMY NIVEN 01/18/07 01/22/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $522.48 AMY NIVEN 01/30/07 02/01/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $431.29 AMY NIVEN 01/30/07 02/01/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $817.46 AMY NIVEN 01/30/07 02/01/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $40.25 AMY NIVEN 01/23/07 01/25/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $215.09 RICHARD NORDQUIST 01/31/07 02/02/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $141.37 RICHARD NORDQUIST 01/31/07 02/02/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $219.39 RICHARD NORDQUIST 01/19/07 01/22/07 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT $5.85 ERICK OSWALD 01/19/07 01/22/07 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIP -MN $87.23 ERICK OSWALD 01/19/07 01/22/07 MENARDS 3059 $53.79 ERICK OSWALD 01/20/07 01/22/07 U OF M CCE ON LINE $70.00 ERICK OSWALD 01/24/07 01/25/07 U OF M BLOSYS /AG ENG OL $150.00 ERICK OSWALD 01/22/07 01/23/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $100.54 MARY KAY PALANK 01/29/07 01/31/07 FILING STORE COM $29.57 MARY KAY PALANK 01/26/07 01/29/07 BATTERIES PLUS $80.90 ROBERT PETERSON 01/19/07 01/22/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $105.44 PHILIP F POWELL 01/23/07 01/24/07 GRAFIX SHOPPE $201.29 PHILIP F POWELL 01/23/07 01/24/07 HTCI@a LCTECHNOLOGY $27.02 PHILIP F POWELL 01/19/07 01/22/07 LEEANN CHIN INC #17 $27.70 ROBERT PRECHTEL 01/24/07 01/25/07 TARGET 00011858 $183.98 ROBERT PRECHTEL 01/25/07 01/26/07 MENARDS 3059 $15.31 ROBERT PRECHTEL 01/26/07 01/29/07 MED ALLIANCE GROUP $509.90 ROBERT PRECHTEL 01/26/07 01/29/07 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $303.63 ROBERT PRECHTEL 01/19/07 01/22/07 CENTURY BOOKSTORE $17.00 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 02/01/07 02/02/07 GE CAPITAL $331.22 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 01/18/07 01/22/07 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $79.18 STEVEN PRIEM 01/19/07 01/22/07 KATH AUTO PARTS LC $90.60 STEVEN PRIEM 01/19/07 01/22/07 POLAR CHEVROLET $54.47 STEVEN PRIEM 01/22/07 01/23/07 FASTENAL CO MO TO $119.24 STEVEN PRIEM 01/22/07 01/23/07 MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC. -PL $302.89 STEVEN PRIEM 01/22/07 01/23/07 MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC. -PL $42.64 STEVEN PRIEM 01/22/07 01/23/07 MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC. -PL $71.04 STEVEN PRIEM 01/23/07 01/25/07 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $44.68 STEVEN PRIEM 01/23/07 01/26/07 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPL $49.01 STEVEN PRIEM Visa Transactions 1 -20 -07 to 2 -2 -07 Trans Date Posting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 01/24/07 01/25/07 PAM OIL INC $70.35 STEVEN PRIEM 01/24/07 01/25/07 HOTSY EQUIPMENT OF MINNES $79.60 STEVEN PRIEM 01/24/07 01/26/07 KATH AUTO PARTS LC $130.76 STEVEN PRIEM 01/24/07 01/26/07 TWIN CITY SAW CO $44.08 STEVEN PRIEM 01/24/07 01/26/07 BAUER BOLT TRE33200023 $456.35 STEVEN PRIEM 01/24/07 01/26/07 KREMER SPRING ALIGNMENT & $548.17 STEVEN PRIEM 01/25/07 01/29/07 KATH AUTO PARTS LC $21.02 STEVEN PRIEM 01/25/07 01/29/07 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $56.09 STEVEN PRIEM 01/25/07 01/29/07 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19 $47.65 STEVEN PRIEM 01/26/07 01/29/07 TRUCK UTILITIES INC $90.89 STEVEN PRIEM 01/31/07 02/01/07 PARTS ASSOCIATES INC ($85.77) STEVEN PRIEM 01/20/07 01/22/07 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS $2,012.63 KEVIN RABBETT 01/24/07 01/25/07 HEALTHEAST TRANSPORTATN $32.14 KEVIN RABBETT 01/24/07 01/25/07 HEARTLAND SERVICES $185.52 KEVIN RABBETT 01/24/07 01/29/07 SHRED -IT $129.87 KEVIN RABBETT 01/26/07 01/29/07 GRAFIX SHOPPE $816.00 KEVIN RABBETT 01/26/07 01/29/07 THE STAR TRIBUNE - ADVERTIS ($393.60) TERRIE RAMEAUX 01/26/07 01/29/07 THE STAR TRIBUNE - ADVERTIS {$2,203.00} TERRIE RAMEAUX 01/27/07 01/29/07 THE STAR TRIBUNE - ADVERTIS $2,203.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX 01/27/07 01/29/07 THE STAR TRIBUNE - ADVERTIS $393.60 TERRIE RAMEAUX 01/27/07 01/29/07 THE STAR TRIBUNE - ADVERTIS $727.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX 01/27/07 01/29/07 THE STAR TRIBUNE - ADVERTIS $98.40 TERRIE RAMEAUX 01/23/07 01/26/07 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $824.89 MICHAEL REILLY 01/26/07 02/02/07 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $20.86 MICHAEL REILLY 01/20/07 01/22/07 TARGET 00011858 $110.07 AUDRA ROBBINS 01/20/07 01/22/07 CUB FOODS, INC. $15.33 AUDRA ROBBINS 01/25/07 01/29/07 CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03 $10.50 AUDRA ROBBINS 01/26/07 01/29/07 HISTORY THEATRE $305.00 AUDRA ROBBINS 01/23/07 01/25/07 RED WING SHOE STORE $156.40 ROBERT RUNNING 01/24/07 01/26/07 RED WING SHOE STORE ($156.40) ROBERT RUNNING 01/31/07 02/01/07 TRUCK UTILITIES INC $10.44 ROBERT RUNNING 01/31/07 02/01/07 A & K EQUIPMENT COMPANY $380.21 ROBERT RUNNING 01/31/07 02/01/07 MENARDS 3059 $8.14 ROBERT RUNNING 01/22/07 01/23/07 TGI FRIDAY'S #0472 $110.73 HARRIET J RYDEL 01/22/07 01/23/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $108.15 HARRIET J RYDEL 01/23/07 01/24/07 GECAPITAL $43.67 HARRIET J RYDEL 01/24/07 01/25/07 PAYPAL *PIM $47.70 HARRIET J RYDEL 01/29/07 01/31/07 PEI WEI ASIANDINER0113 $142.71 HARRIET J RYDEL 01/31/07 02/02/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $44.13 HARRIET J RYDEL 01/31/07 02/02/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $162.66 HARRIET J RYDEL 02/01/07 02/02/07 GE CAPITAL $43.67 HARRIET J RYDEL 01/31/07 02/01/07 MENARDS 3059 $467.54 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 01/22/07 01/23/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $87.11 DEB SCHMIDT 01/24/07 01/29/07 SHRED -IT $17.65 DEB SCHMIDT 01/30/07 02/01/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $180.92 DEB SCHMIDT 01/26/07 01/29/07 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $219.39 SCOTT SCHULTZ 02/01/07 02/02/07 T- MOBILE $45.06 SCOTT SCHULTZ 01/19/07 01/22/07 SECRETARY OF STATE $44.00 MICHAEL SHORTREED 01/22/07 01/24/07 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $255.00 MICHAEL SHORTREED 01/29/07 01/30/07 LIFESAVERS CONFERENCE 3 $200.00 MICHAEL SHORTREED 01/31/07 02/01/07 HILTON HOTELS DEPOSIT $195.03 MICHAEL SHORTREED 01/19/07 01/22/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $137.23 ANDREA SINDT 01/31/07 02/02/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $124.59 ANDREA SINDT 02/01/07 02/02/07 T- MOBILE IVR PAYMENT $75.27 ANDREA SINDT 01/22/07 01/25/07 RX EXPRESS MARKETING INC $676.00 PAULINE STAPLES 01/23/07 01/25/07 MICHAELS #2744 $651.65 PAULINE STAPLES Visa Transactions 1 -20 -07 to 2 -2 -07 Trans Date Posting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 01/25/07 01/29/07 MICHAELS #2744 $79.83 PAULINE STAPLES 01/25/07 01/29/07 OFFICE MAX $26.39 PAULINE STAPLES 01/26/07 01/29/07 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $1,366.30 PAULINE STAPLES 01/19/07 01/22/07 WEBER ELECTRIC $409.94 LYLE SWANSON 01/24/07 01/26/07 UTILITY CHEMICALS $322.27 LYLE SWANSON 02/01/07 02/02/07 T- MOBILE $103.92 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN 01/20/07 01/22/07 QWESTCOMM *TN651 $346.01 JUDY TETZLAFF 01/24/07 01/25/07 COMCAST CABLE COMM $111.30 JUDY TETZLAFF 01/25/07 01/26/07 QWESTCOMM *TN651 $57.57 JUDY TETZLAFF 01/22/07 01/23/07 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI $288.18 DAVID J THOMALLA 01/24/07 01/25/07 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL AND SUI $223.77 DAVID J THOMALLA 01/21/07 01/22/07 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 $4.78 JOSEPH WATERS 01/23/07 01/24/07 FIREHOUSE /CYGNUS ($16.05) SUSAN ZWIEG 01/23/07 01/25/07 MINUTEMAN PRESS $112.85 SUSAN ZWIEG 01/24/07 01/25/07 AE SIGN SYSTEMS $10.12 SUSAN ZWIEG 01/25/07 01/29/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $317.82 SUSAN ZWIEG 01/30/07 02/01/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 ($32.58) SUSAN ZWIEG 01/30/07 02/01/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 {$36.40} SUSAN ZWIEG 01/30/07 02/01/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $104.30 SUSAN ZWIEG 01/31/07 02/02/07 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $134.17 SUSAN ZWIEG $42,927.14 02/16/2007 Check Date 72054 72055 72056 72057 72058 72059 72060 72061 72062 72063 72064 72065 72066 72067 72068 72069 72070 72071 72072 72073 72074 72075 72076 72077 72078 72079 72080 72081 72082 72083 72084 72085 72086 72087 72088 72089 72090 72091 72092 72093 72094 72095 72096 72097 72098 72099 72100 72101 02/15/2007 02/15/2007 02/15/2007 02115/2007 02/15/2007 02115/2007 02/1512007 02115/2007 02/15/2007 02115/2007 02/15/2007 02115/2007 02/15/2007 02115/2007 02/15/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/2012007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02/16/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/2012007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/2012007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 00 0000 00 00 00 1011 f!!! 00 00 0000 00 ifii 00 1011 00 i 1 f f 1 1 f 1 •1 i •i 1 1 f f •f i •i Ifif 1! 1 it If ff it 1� 1!� 1!' it • 1 :f f 1 1 f 1!' 1 i If f i . 1 1 f 1 ! i111 Ifif Check Register City of Maplewood ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ERICKSON OIL PRODUCTS INC EUREKA RECYCLING RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV REINHART FOODSERVICE CITY OF ST PAUL XCELENERGY XCELENERGY XCELENERGY XCELENERGY XCELENERGY XCELENERGY XCELENERGY XCELENERGY ONE TIME VENDOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC ANTHONY BARILLA, JR PAUL BARTZ PAUL BARTZ TIM BELDEN DALE BOETCHER BONESTROO & ASSOCIATES DON BOWMAN DON'S PAINT & BODY SHOP DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE CO GRAFIX SHOPPE BEKAH GRAHAM PERRY HANSON HEALTHEAST VEHICLE SERVICES HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC PATRICK JAMES HUBBARD KUSTOM SIGNALS INC LA METTRY'S COLLISION MAPLEWOOD BAKERY MCA STUDENT SERVICES COMMITTEE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ALESIA METRY RANDALL MOTT MARCIA CHRISTENA MUELLER NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR Description REFUND G BENEKE - BCBS INS CREDIT REFUND K SMITH - BCBS INS CREDIT REFUND N RUSSELL - BCBS INS CREDIT REFUND C ERIKSSON - BCBS INS REFUND S DANIELS - BCBS INS CREDIT REFUND C STUTSMAN - BCBS INS REFUND D WHORTON - BCBS INS REFUND D CUMMINGS - BCBS INS REFUND J PETERS - BCBS INS CREDIT REFUND A SCHNEIDER - BCBS INS REFUND K VOGT - BCBS INS CREDIT REFUND S WELLS - BCBS INS CREDIT REFUND D MCKENZIE - BCBS INS REFUND J HAIDER - BCBS INS CREDIT REFUND L MAHOWALD - BCBS INS CAR WASHES - JAN RECYCLING - FEB RECORDING FEES MDSE FOR RESALE RADIO SERVICE & MAINT - JAN ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY ELECTRIC UTILITY ELECTRIC & GAS UTILTIY ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY EQUIPMENT LOAN ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY FIRE SIRENS FIRE SIRENS REFUND E NELSON - BCBS INS CREDIT PATROL & BOARDING FEE 1/29 - 2/11 VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL REIMB FOR UNIFORMS 117 REIMB FOR USB DRIVE 12/31 TUNE PIANO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN FOR CAMPUS VOLLEYBALL COORDINATOR REPAIR DAMAGE TO SQUAD - CN I.D. CHECKING GUIDE REPAIR GRAFFICS TO SQUAD - CN VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL REPAIR SQUAD - CN 07000862 PROJ 04 -21 GLADSTONE MASTER PLAN PROJ 04 -21 GLADSTONE REDEV - JAN VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL EAGLE II, DUAL KA DCM ANTENNA REPAIR DAMAGE TO SQUAD - CN MDSE FOR RESALE ADMISSION FEE MONTHLY SAC - JAN REIMB FOR DARE PARTY 2/9 VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL CITY NEWSLETTER - JAN REFUND E TRAFOYA - MN REV REFUND REFUND M DEMARRE - BASKETBALL Amount 34.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 19.00 17.00 17.00 115.02 13,111.90 368.00 325.29 167.88 14,592.76 12,538.72 7,267.13 4,023.17 756.64 594.85 48.14 46.63 20.00 996.09 483.00 39.38 19.25 60.00 69.00 4,625.68 516.00 861.46 80.80 175.73 345.00 414.00 291.47 4,391.49 400.00 1,081.00 2,627.96 3,824.77 343.29 40.00 3,316.50 43.53 345.00 69.00 3,344.00 285.00 100.00 A 02/16/2007 Check Date 72102 72103 72104 72105 72106 72107 72108 72109 72110 72111 72112 72113 72114 WAS 72116 72117 72118 72119 72120 72121 72122 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/2012007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/20/2007 02120/2007 02/2012007 02/20/2007 00 00001 00 00 00 1011 f!!! 00 :0 it •. 1 f . i 1 f .• i 1 1 1 i :• ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ROGER PACKER DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY NANCY STEFFEN STERNBERG LIGHTING, INC STERNBERG LIGHTING, INC JOANNE SVENDSEN JOANNE SVENDSEN UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA VAN DYKE STREET HOMES VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MARK WEBER WEBQA INC. CITY OF WOODBURY 69 Checks in this report. Check Register City of Maplewood Description REFUND D KILIAN - PROGRAM FEE REFUND T RONNEI - OVERPD REFUND EJ ZERWAS - BCBS INS REFUND K KONG - BCBS REFUND P COMFORT - PROGRAM FEE REFUND B DY- MEMBERSHIP REFUND N RICHTER - PROGRAM FEE REFUND J CARLSON - BCBS INS CREDIT VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL TRAINING TRAINING TRANSFER TITLES OF FORFEITURE VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL REPAIR STREET LIGHTS - LEGACY DEV REPAIR STREET LIGHTS - LEGACY DEV REIMB FOR MILEAGE 11/29 - 12131 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 111 - 2/12 CLASS REGISTRATION CLASS REGISTRATION TIF PMT TO DEVELOPER - 94% DUMPSTER SERVICE DEMO JOY PARK VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL IMPLEMENTATION FEE & SERVICE -FEB SEWER MAINTENANCE Amount 64.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 50.00 33.75 30.00 20.00 759.00 50.00 50.00 35.00 46.00 4,840.00 800.00 4.90 4.61 310.00 200.00 19,403.11 535.90 345.00 1,750.00 204.00 i1A CITY OF MApLBNDDD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee 02/000 02X}8/O7 U2/OO/07 02/0A/O7 O2/0A/O7 02/O8/O7 02/OA/O7 02/12/07 O2/09/07 U2/OQ/07 02/OD/O7 O2/0A/O7 O2/13/O7 02/OA/O7 02/14/O7 02/O9/07 O2/09/07 U2X}8X}7 (20807 O2/12/07 O2/12/07 02/12/O7 02/12/O7 O2/13/07 O2/13/07 U2/13/O7 U2/13/O7 U2/13/07 O2/14/07 02/14/O7 02/15/O7 O2/1G/O7 MN State Treasurer |CMA(VantaQapointa) K4N Dept of Natural Resources MN State Treasurer U.S.Tnaaourer P.E.R.& |CMA(Vantagepointe) MN State Treasurer MidAmehoa- |NG Labor Unions MN State Treasurer VV| Dept ofRevenue MN State Treasurer Orchard Trust MN State Treasurer ARC Administration I I [Q I F- Description Drivers License/Deputy Registrar Deferred Compensation DNR electronic licenses Drivers License/Deputy Registrar Federal Payroll Tax P. E.R.A. RHS Drivers License/Deputy Registrar HRA Rex plan Union Dues State Payroll Tax State Payroll Tax Drivers License/Deputy Registrar Deferred Compensation Drivers License/Deputy Registrar DCRP& Flex plan payments Amount 8.019.50 6,937.80 1,109.50 14,352.98 03.423.34 84 382.35 10.871.70 1,934.55 2,986.71 17,568.65 973.74 12,200.85 26,746.49 7 872.30 �� CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 02/09/07 CAVE, REBECCA 397.80 02/09/07 HJELLE, ERIK 397.80 02/09/07 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 397.80 02/09/07 ROSSBACH, WILLIAM 397.80 02/09/07 COPELAND, EUGENE 3,090.00 02/09/07 RYDEL, HARRIET 1,608.35 02/09/07 FARR, LARRY 1,998.20 02/091/07 SWANSON, LYLE 1,785.97 02/091/07 RAMEAUX, THERESE 2,893.83 02/09/07 SCHMIDT, DEBORAH 1,719.75 02/09/07 ANDERSON, CAROLE 2,164.50 02/09/07 BAUMAN, GAYLE 3,898.34 02/09/07 DEBILZAN, JUDY 900.00 02/09/07 JACKSON, MARY 1,956.17 02/09/07 KELSEY, CONNIE 2,780.38 02/09/07 TETZLAFF, JUDY 1,998.56 02/09/07 FRY, PATRICIA 1,833.22 02/09/07 GUILFOILE, KAREN 3,443.06 02/09/07 MORSON, JOHN 693.84 02/09/07 SPANGLER, EDNA 1,280.89 02/09/07 ANDERSON, SUZANNE 1,564.75 02/09/07 JAGOE, CAROL 1,74996 02/09/07 KELLY, LISA 2,014.07 02/091/07 MECHELKE, SHERRIE 1,721.02 02/091/07 MOY, PAMELA 1,192.07 02/09/07 OSTER, ANDREA 1,895.51 02/09/07 WEAVER, KRISTINE 1,920.15 02/09/07 BANICK, JOHN 0.00 02/09/07 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,750.55 02/09/07 POWELL, PHILIP 2,501.03 02/09/07 RICHIE, CAROLE 1,773.23 02/09/07 THOMALLA, DAVID 4,429.00 02/09/07 ABEL, CLINT 2,400.11 02/091/07 ALDRIDGE, MARK 2,445.82 02/09'07 ANDREWS, SCOTT 3,568.85 02/09/07 BAKKE, LONN 2,677.92 02/09/07 BARTZ, PAUL 2,445.82 02/09/07 BELDE, STANLEY 2,850.82 02/09/07 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 3,106.43 02/09/07 BOHL, JOHN 2,724.78 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 02/091/07 BUSACK, DANIEL 2,400.11 02/09/07 COFFEY, KEVIN 2,664.98 02/09/07 CROTTY, KERRY 2,869.97 02/09/07 DOBLAR, RICHARD 3,064.65 02/09/07 GABRIEL, ANTHONY 2,838.11 02/09/07 HEINZ, STEPHEN 2,67736 02/09/07 HIEBERT, STEVEN 2,997.07 02/09/07 JOHNSON, KEVIN 3,863.93 02/09/07 KALKA, THOMAS 934.53 02/09/07 KAKIS, FLINT 3,436.80 02/09/07 KONG, TOMMY 2,400.11 02/09/07 KROLL, BRETT 2,400.11 02/09/07 KVAM, DAVID 3,523.42 02/09/07 LANGNER, TODD 1,928.74 02/09/07 LARSON, DANIEL 2,565.65 02/091/07 LU, JOHNNIE 2,444.26 02/091/07 MARINO, JASON 2,400.11 02/09/07 MARTIN, DANIEL 688.86 02/09/07 MARTIN, JERROLD 2,514.38 02/09/07 MCCARTY, GLEN 2,532.55 02/09/07 METRY, ALESIA 2,576.69 02/09/07 NYE, MICHAEL 2,103.01 02/09/07 OLSON, JULIE 2,664.98 02/09/07 RABBETT, KEVIN 3,587.70 02/09/07 RHUDE, MATTHEW 1,900.18 02/09/07 STEFFEN, SCOTT 4,161.85 02/09/07 STEINER, JOSEPH 2,054.41 02/09/07 SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM 1,874.47 02/09/07 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 2,630.65 02/09/07 TRAN, JOSEPH 2,393.27 02/09/07 WENZEL, JAY 2,455.29 02/091/07 XIONG, KAO 2,411.15 02/091/07 BERGERON, JOSEPH 3,914.84 02/09/07 DUGAS, MICHAEL 2,907.72 02/09/07 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 2,653.80 02/09/07 FLOR, TIMOTHY 3,137.06 02/09/07 FRASER, JOHN 2,720.07 02/09/07 LANGNER, SCOTT 2,445.82 02/09/07 PALMA, STEVEN 3.522.15 02/09/07 THEISEN, PAUL 2,558.32 13 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 02/091/07 THIENES, PAUL 2,628.65 02/09/07 BARTA, JEREMY 2,011.25 02/09/07 DAWSON, RICHARD 2,959.39 02/09/07 DUELLMAN, KIRK 2,166.89 02/09 /07 EVERSON, PAUL 2,589.45 02/09/07 HALWEG, JODI 1,846.02 02/09/07 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS 2,574.49 02/09/07 NOVAK, JEROME 2,885.61 02/09/07 PARSONS, KURT 2,463.50 02/09/07 PETERSON, ROBERT 2,721.20 02/09/07 PRECHTEL, ROBERT 2,335.78 02/09/07 SVENDSEN, RONALD 3,014.28 02/09/07 GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE 2,868.34 02/09/07 BAUER, MICHELLE 1,727.75 02/09/07 BURAU, JAMES 1,603.75 02/091/07 FLAUGHER, JAYME 1,932.95 02/091/07 HERMANSON, CHAD 1,676.55 02/09/07 HUBIN, KENNARD 1,818.78 02/09/07 KNAPP, BRETT 1,978.05 02/09/07 LINN, BRYAN 2,117.45 02/09/07 PACOLT, MARSHA 2,529.68 02/09/07 RABINE, JANET 2,26825 02/09/07 STAHNKE, JULIE 1,931.75 02/09/07 LUKIN, STEVEN 4.016.18 02/09/07 ZWIEG, SUSAN 1,926.68 02/09/07 DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT 293.39 02/09/07 AHL, R. CHARLES 4,675.69 02/09/07 KNUTSON, LOIS 1,639.36 02/09/07 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 3,059.51 02/09/07 NIVEN, AMY 1,365.73 02/09/07 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 2,601.26 02/091/07 BRINK, TROY 2,312.13 02/091/07 BUCKLEY, BRETT 1,649.55 02/09/07 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 2,248.98 02/09/07 EDGE, DOUGLAS 2,248.57 02/09/07 FREBERG, RONALD 2,171.64 02/09/07 JONES, DONALD 2,133.97 02/09/07 MEYER, GERALD 2,065.51 02/09/07 NAGEL, BRYAN 2,486.01 02/09/07 OSWALD, ERICK 2,180.22 ITH CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 02/091/07 RUNNING, ROBERT 1,977.89 02/09/07 TEVLIN, TODD 2,070.81 02/09/07 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,521.69 02/09/07 ENGSTROM, ANDREW 1,854.55 02/09/07 ISAKSON, CHAD 353.09 02/09/07 JACOBSOM SCOTT 1,830.03 02/09/07 JAROSCH, JONATHAN 2,222.95 02/09/07 KUMMER, STEVEN 2,558.97 02/09/07 LABEREE, ERIN 2,882.35 02/09/07 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,521.67 02/09/07 MEINHOLZ, WILLIAM 184.80 02/09/07 SCHREMPP, ANTHONY 157.82 02/09/07 THOMPSON, MMICHAEL 2,480.47 02/09/07 ANDERSON, BRUCE 4,184.27 02/09/07 HALL, KATHLEEN 1,899.49 02/091/07 MARUSKA, MARK 2,877.03 02/091/07 NAUGHTON, JOHN 1,975.68 02/09/07 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1,978.46 02/09/07 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 2,021.88 02/09/07 DEAVER, CHARLES 577.61 02/09/07 GERNES, CAROLE 159.00 02/09/07 HAYMAN, JANET 1,409.17 02/09/07 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,434.31 02/091/07 NELSON, JEAN 4,375.92 02/091/07 GAYNOR. VIRGINIA 2,151.75 02/09/07 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 3,388.52 02/09/07 KROLL, LISA 1,498.38 02/09/07 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE 1,169.63 02/09/07 SINDT, ANDREA 1,82215 02/09/07 THOMPSON, DEBRA 795.39 02/09/07 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,724.15 02/091/07 FINWALL, SHANN 2,584.63 02/091/07 ROBERTS, KENNETH 2,736.47 02/09/07 BRASH, JASON 1,611.75 02/09/07 CARVER, NICHOLAS 2,980.81 02/09/07 FISHER, DAVID 3,877.36 02/09/07 RICE, MICHAEL 2,20335 02/09/07 SWAN, DAVID 2,31135 02/09/07 WELLENS, MOLLY 1,536.95 02/09/07 BJORK, ALICIA 170.63 im CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 02/091/07 BJORK, BRANDON 379.25 02/09/07 GOODRICH, CHAD 342.25 02/09/07 MCBRIDE, PATRICK 120.00 02/09 /07 NIEMAN, JAMES 245.00 02/09/07 OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN 374.63 02/09/07 ROBBINS, AUDRA 2,389.84 02/09/07 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 109.50 02/09/07 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS 2,854.34 02/09/07 UNDERHILL, KRISTEN 288.00 02/09/07 GERMAIN, DAVID 1,985.39 02/09/07 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 1,977.53 02/09/07 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 2,335.81 02/09/07 ANZALDI, MANDY 538.29 02/09/07 CARLY, HEIDI 2,275.78 02/09/07 COLLINS, ASHLEY 66.00 02/091/07 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND 209.00 02/091/07 EVANS, CHRISTINE 900.61 02/09/07 GRAF, MICHAEL 2,187.63 02/09/07 HER, CHONG 361.00 02/09/07 HOFMEISTER, MARY 893.23 02/09/07 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 657.15 02/09/07 SCHULZE, BRIAN 1,309.59 02/09/07 STAPLES, PAULINE 3,028.20 02/09/07 TOLBERT, FRANCINE 156.00 02/09/07 BRENEMAN, NEIL 508.73 02/09/07 BRUSOE, CRISTINA 199.25 02/09/07 BUCKLEY, BRITTANY 121.78 02/09/07 DUNN, RYAN 1,395.74 02/09/07 EVANS, KRISTIN 175.60 02/09/07 FONTAINE, KIM 1,029.85 02/09/07 GREDVIG, ANDERS 398.61 02/091/07 HASSENSTAB, DENISE 86.70 02/091/07 HORWATH, RONALD 2,356.85 02/09/07 IRISH, PETER 131.63 02/09/07 KERSCHNER, JOLENE 28.75 02/09/07 KOEHNEN, AMY 78.15 02/09/07 KOEHNEN, MARY 1,520.42 02/09/07 KROLL, MARK 408.00 02/09/07 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 683.33 02/09/07 MATHEWS, LEAH 168.38 in CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 17 02/091/07 PROESCH, ANDY 344.64 02/09/07 SMITH, ANN 295.50 02/09/07 TRUE, CAROLINE 202.35 02/09/07 TUPY, HEIDE 169.60 02/09 /07 TUPY, MARCUS 407.93 02/09/07 WOLFGRAM, MARY 116.88 02/09/07 GROPPOLI, LINDA 327.50 02/09/07 HER, SHILLAME 79.95 02/09/07 HOLMGREN, STEPHANIE 87.50 02/09/07 STEVENS, PATTI 182.53 02/09/07 BEHAN, JAMES 1,957.76 02/09/07 BERLIN, SARAH 420.35 02/09/07 PATTERSON, ALBERT 1,291.56 02/09/07 PRINS, KELLY 1,272.63 02/09/07 REILLY, MICHAEL 2,037.91 02/091/07 SCHOENECKER, LEIGH 165.84 02/091/07 VANG, HUE 132.05 02/09/07 AICHELE, CRAIG 2,025.75 02/09/07 PRIEM, STEVEN 2,243.07 02/09 /07 WOEHRLE, MATTHEW 1,769.53 02/09/07 BERGO, CHAD 2,355.82 02/09/07 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 2,686.82 02/09/07 FRANZEN, NICHOLAS 2,088.65 1001171 02/09/07 LONGRIE, DIANA 452.00 1001172 02/09/07 JAHN, DAVID 1,710.86 1001173 02/09/07 MORIN, TROY 165.75 1001174 02/09/07 HANSEN, LORI 1,894.04 1001175 02/09/07 GENNOW, PAMELA 188.50 1001176 02/09/07 PALANK, MARY 1,752.86 1001177 02/09/07 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 1,93699 1001178 02/09/07 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 3,268.81 1001179 02/091/07 WELCHLIN, CABOT 2,537.23 1001180 02/091/07 EDSON, DAVID 2,089.94 1001181 02/09/07 HELEY, ROLAND 2,018.59 1001182 02/09/07 HINNENKAMP, GARY 2,065.63 1001183 02/09/07 LINDORFF, DENNIS 1,980.77 1001184 02/09/07 NOVAK, MICHAEL 2,118.83 1001185 02/09/07 ABRAHAMSON, TYLER 50.00 1001186 02/09/07 BERGER, STEPHANIE 890.38 1001187 02/09/07 BONKO, NICHOLAS 30.00 17 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 1001188 02/091/07 BROZAK, KATHERINE 481.25 1001189 02/09/07 BURNS, BETH 35.00 1001190 02/09/07 CHEZIK, CARLEY 67.50 1001191 02/09 /07 CHURCHILL, JOHN 134.00 1001192 02/09/07 CORBETT, CAITLIN 5100 1001193 02/09/07 DAHL, SAMUEL 2100 1001194 02/09/07 DANIELS, ALYSHIA 20.00 1001195 02/09/07 DANIELS. DANIELLE 22.00 1001196 02/09/07 DEGREE, AMANDA 54.69 1001197 02/09/07 DOTAS, ANDREW 13.00 1001198 02/09/07 DOTAS, KENT 30.00 1001199 02/09/07 DOTAS, ROCHELLE 20.00 1001200 02/09/07 GAVIN, BENJAMIN 43.00 1001201 02/09/07 GOODRICH, DANIELLE 99.00 1001202 02/09/07 GREEN, DANIEL 21.75 1001203 02/091/07 GREENER, DOUGLAS 48.00 1001204 02/091/07 HANNIGAN, BRADY 36.00 1001205 02/09/07 HANNIGAN, TYLER 32.25 1001206 02/09/07 HOLDER, MOLLY 69.00 1001207 02/09 /07 JACKSON, ANGIE 30.00 1001208 02/09/07 JACKSON, CHRISTOPHER 19.50 1001209 02/09/07 JACKSON, HANNAH 30.00 1001210 02/09/07 JOHNSON, ALEXANDER 36.00 1001211 02/091/07 JUETTNER, MICHAEL 47.25 1001212 02/091/07 KLEIN, AARON 22.50 1001213 02/09/07 KOHLMAN, JENNIFER 100.00 1001214 02/09/07 LINDA, KELLIE 519.50 1001215 02/09/07 LUKIN, CASSANDRA 16.00 1001216 02/09/07 MALLET, AMANDA 33.75 1001217 02/09/07 MILTON, ZACHARY 21.50 1001218 02/09/07 MOBLEY, CAROLYN 20.00 1001219 02/091/07 MORRISETTE, WILLIAM 27.00 1001220 02/091/07 MORRISETTE, ZACHARY 21.50 1001221 02/09/07 MUELLNER, CHADD 45.00 1001222 02/09/07 NELSON, KIRSTEN 30.00 1001223 02/09/07 NICHOLS, SAMUEL 31.50 1001224 02/09/07 NICHOLSON, COLIN 4725 1001225 02/09/07 ROBBINS, EMERALD 406.00 1001226 02/09/07 ROELLER, MICHAEL 43.00 1001227 02/09/07 RUNNING, DUSTIN 271.25 im CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 1001228 02/091/07 SCHALLER, SCOTT 305.00 1001229 02/09/07 SERGOT, COLLIN 272.00 1001230 02/09/07 STACKPOLE, QUINN 78.00 1001231 02/09/07 STODOLA, JONATHAN 120.00 1001232 02/09 /07 TARR -JR, GUS 90.00 1001233 02/09/07 HAAG, MARK 2,00193 1001234 02/09/07 NADEAU, EDWARD 3,061.98 1001235 02/09/07 GLASS, JEAN 1,952.06 1001236 02/09/07 NAGEL, BROOKE 405.45 1001237 02/09/07 SIMPSON, JOSEPH 200.70 1001238 02/09/07 VELASQUEZ, ANGELA 40.50 1001239 02/09/07 ANDERSON, JOSHUA 149.10 1001240 02/09/07 ANDERSON, JUSTIN 13490 1001241 02/09/07 BENJAMIN, AYLA 104.25 1001242 02/09/07 BRENEMAN, SEAN 68.60 1001243 02/091/07 BRUSOE, AMY 128.25 1001244 02/091/07 CHASTAN, ADAM 58.50 1001245 02/09/07 CLARK, PAMELA 214.20 1001246 02/09/07 COSTA, JOSEPH 330.10 1001247 02/09/07 DEMPSEY, BETH 98.00 1001248 02/09/07 FENGER, JUSTIN 3720 1001249 02/09/07 GIEL, NICOLE 28.00 1001250 02/09/07 GRANT, MELISSA 100.75 1001251 02/09/07 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 567.13 1001252 02/09/07 HOLMGREN, LEAH 87.00 1001253 02/09/07 JOHNSON, JAMES 107.73 1001254 02/09/07 LEMAY, KATHERINE 51.38 1001255 02/09/07 NWANOKWALE, MORDY 104.63 1001256 02/09/07 PEHOSKI, JOEL 7910 1001257 02/09/07 RICHTER, DANIEL 68.00 1001258 02/09/07 RICHTER, NANCY 337.25 1001259 02/091/07 ROSTRON, ROBERT 150.75 1001260 02/091/07 RYAN, ERICA 72.80 1001261 02/09/07 SAUCERMAN, MICHAEL 339.88 1001262 02/09/07 SCHMIDT, EMILY 134.01 1001263 02/09/07 SCHMIDT, JOHN 58.50 1001264 02/09/07 SCHRAMM, BRITTANY 163.70 1001265 02/09/07 SCHUNEMAN, GREGORY 78.00 1001266 02/09/07 STAHNKE, AMY 35.00 1001267 02/09/07 TAYLOR, JASON 104.63 11/' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 1001268 02/091/07 WARNER, CAROLYN 326.95 1001269 02/09107 WEDES, CARYL 98.00 1001270 02/09/07 WERNER, REBECCA 330.46 1001271 02/09/07 WHITE, NICOLE 554.76 1001272 02109/07 WOODMAN, ALICE 174.60 1001273 02/09/07 ZALK, IDA 8L25 1001274 02/09/07 BOSLEY, CAROL 344.65 1001275 02/09107 KELLY, MICHAEL 115.50 1001276 02/09107 LEWIS, AMY 110.60 1001277 02/09/07 OIE, REBECCA 97.38 1001278 02/09/07 PARAYNO, GUAI 329.70 1001279 02109/07 SATTLER, CASSANDRA 49.20 1001280 02109/07 STODGHILL, AMANDA 39.88 1001281 02109/07 ZAGLR, LINNEA 231.51 1001282 02109/07 BIRKHOLZ, TYLER 55.60 1001283 02/091/07 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,773.32 1001284 02/091/07 GADOW, ANNA 134.20 1001285 02/09; HER, CHEE 57.15 1001286 02/09; HER, PETER 82.55 1001287 02109/07 O`GRADY, VICTORIA 278.70 1001288 021091'07 SCHULZE, KEVIN 209.48 1001289 02109/07 VANG, KAY 106.50 1001290 02/09/07 VANG, TIM 13135 1001291 02/09/07 VUE, LOR PAO 173.75 462,599.68 NE AGENDA NO. I -2 TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: CARRY OVER OF 2006 APPROPRIATIONS TO 2007 DATE: February 20, 2007 It has been past practice to permit the carry over from one year to the next of unspent monies for specific purposes. This involves reductions in the 2006 Budget and corresponding increases in the 2007 Budget. Funding for these carryovers will came from fund balance. It is recommended that the City Council approve the following carry over requests. Fund Amount Account No. For General Fund $3,500 101 - 115 -4130 Building janitorial supplies General Fund 22,000 101 - 115 -4410 Construction of new offices & furniture General Fund 6,600 101 -115 -4410 Public Works building storage area General Fund 17,890 101 - 115 -4410 Paint interior of city hall General Fund 31,240 101 - 402 -4630 Ticketwriter project General Fund 7,650 101- 401 -4025 Police temp wages General Fund 7,500 101 - 301 -4165 2 ATM machines General Fund 3,500 101 - 301 -4160 Lobby bench seating General Fund 2,800 101 - 301 -4160 4 lateral file cabinets General Fund 1,200 101- 301 -4160 2 file cabinets wlstorage General Fund 1,450 101 - 301 -4160 3 LED signs General Fund 1,600 101 - 301 -4165 Passport camera Justice Assistance Grant 9,000 216 -402 -4011 Balance of grant expenditures Justice Assistance Grant 2,370 216 - 402 -4165 Balance of grant expenditures Buffer Zone Protection Plan Grant 48,400 217 - 402 -4165 Balance of grant expenditures Capital Improvements Projects Fund 4,800 405 - 000 -4490 Consulting for campus improvements Capital Improvements Projects Fund 3,930 405 -000 -4720 Campus improvements Legacy Village Park Development Fund 77,910 433 - 000 -4720 Legacy Village Park Development Sewer Lift Station #18 Project Fund 4,570 435 - 000 -4759 Sewer Lift Station #18 $257,910 Total for all funds In addition, the budgets for grant funds not yet received should be carried over from 2006 to 2007. It is recommended that the City Council approve the following revenue budget carry over requests. Fund Amount Account No. For Justice Assistance Grant $11,410 216 - 000 -3516 Balance of grant funds Buffer Zone Protection Plan Grant 48,400 217 - 000 -3516 Balance of grant funds Park Development Fund 29,000 403 -000 -3534 Hazelwood Soccer Field Capital Improvement Projects Fund 10,000 405 - 000 -3530 Campus Improvements $98,810 Total for all funds PAW ORMAGNIBUDGCARR.DOC A-%genda Item 13 TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Chuck Ah[ Public Works Director/City Engineer Bryan Nagel, Street Superintendent SUBJECT: Approval to Pay for Street Light Repair DATE: February 14 INTRODUCTION Legacy street light repoirenoeed3$5.U0O.0UrequihngC0unCi|@ppr0v8i Background A decorative light pole was damaged beyond repair iD early November 2000. Due bJ public safety concerns new pole and globe assembly were immediately ordered from the [n8Duf@CtuFSr. Sternberg Lighting. A verbal quote 0f$4.840.O0was obtained 8L the time [f the order. Upon submittal 0f the invoice to the city finance department it was discovered that all shipping and taxes were not included in the quote, which exceeded the $5.000limit. Therefore the total cost ia$5 This amount exceeds $5.00Oand therefore council approval iSrequired. Funds are available for maintenance and repairs in8U7-58U-UUO-443U. It is recommended that council approve replacement of the damaged light pole and authorize payment to Sternberg Lighting. Agenda Item 14 TO: City Manager FROM: Tom Ekatoand, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Application for mUse Deed L{]C/\T|{]N: Southeast Corner Of English Street and County Road B [)ATE: February 12.20O7 Last August, the Ramsey County division of tax-forfeited lands notified the city of a tax- forfeited parcel. This was in regards to the undeveloped lot at the southeast corner of English Street and County Road B. This parcel iS8 substandard lot measuring approximately 40 by 60 feet in size totaling 2 square feet. The city code requires that, to be considered buildable, corner lots must have at least 100 feet of frontage on both streets and have at least 10.00U square feet Ofarea. The county explained that the city could apply for a use deed to attain this parcel for a future public purpose. Chuck Ah|. the city engineer, feels that the city needs this parcel for future street interchange, sidewalk and underground utility needs. Council Resolution On October 23, 2006, the city council first considered this matter and adopted a resolution requesting that Ramsey County withhold this parcel from public sale or auction for six months. This resolution gave the city six months to further evaluate our need for this substandard corner parcel tO keep for public purposes. Request Staff is requesting that the council approve the attached resolution requesting that the county grant the city a use deed for this lot to have for future public right-of-way needs. DISCUSSION As stated, Chuck Ahl, the city engineer, recommends that the city apply for a use deed for this parcel. H9 foresees 8 need h3 use this parcel for public roadway i[npnDvRnlRDtS. SpeCifiC@||y. the city could Use this poroR| for the expansion of the int8nSeCtiOD, the continuation of the English Street sidewalk and for buried utilities. To get 8 use deed on this parcel the city council must pass 8 resolution approving Lhe intended use of the property. The cost of this request iS$52.0 payable to Ramsey County. The council should also be aware that, if the city acquires this use deed, the public irnpnJv8nn8nLs anticipated nnVsL be utilized within three years or the county could retract the use deed. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution requesting that Ramsey County grant the city 8 use deed for the parcel on the southeast corner nf English Street and County Road B. The granting of this use deed would serve the City [fK88p|evvOod's needs bv allowing this pGrC8|'S use for public roadway improvements. Specifically, the city could use this p8n:8| for the expansion of the intersection, the continuation of the English Street sidewalk and for buried utilities. psmo1O\mm deed English and 8207 Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Location Map 2 Attachment 1 RESOLUTION USE DEED REQUEST WHEREAS, Ramsey County has given the City Of Maplewood of the opportunity to attain a use deed on a tax forfeited lot. WHEREAS, this property is located Gt the southeast corner 0fCounty Road and English 8Ln8Et, legally described as fd|0vvs: LOT 14 BLOCK 12. G/\B|N /\0[}[[|{]N TO GLA[}GT[)NE RAK8SEYC[>UNTY. M|NNEGC)TA, EXCEPT R{}/\O RIGHT-OF-WAY. F`|[]# 10-29-22-33-0040. WHEREAS, the City Of Maplewood, has determined that having 8 use deed On this pGnCR| vvVU|d serve the city's best interests by nl8kjnQ it available to the city for street hghL-)f-vv8y expansion purposes. The City [f Maplewood would use this parcel for the expansion of the intersection, the continuation of the English Street sidewalk and for burying public utilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council hereby formally requests by that Ramsey County grant a use deed to the City of Maplewood for the parcel legally-described above. The use deed would allow the city tO use this parcel for future right-of-way needs consisting of the expansion of the County Road B/English Street int9rS9Ction, the continuation of the English 8Ln8Et sidewalk and for burying public The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 2007. N 00 >1 m Agenda Item 15 TO: City Manager FROM: Tom EkStrand. Senior Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Reviews—Maplewood Toyota LOCATIONS: NVV Corner nf Highway 61and Beam Avenue and South ofGV|den's Roadhouse [}ATE: January 31.2O07 Two conditional use permits ({|UP8) for Maplewood Toyota that the city council approved are * Build G two-level parking ramp at the NW corner of Highway 61 and Beam Avenue On * Build 8 parking lot on the vacant lot between L8K8ettry Collision and GV|d8n's Roadhouse. This project consistedof824 inventory storage. The CUP allowed a parking lot as a primary use. Refer to the attachments. Parking Ramp On August 8.20U5. the city council approved: • A [}UP revision for parking ramp with car sales within 350 feet of residential property. • The site and architectural p|8Da. • A setback variance from the street right-of-way lines reducing the ramp's setback. Open Parking Lot On August 8, 2005, the city council also approved the parking lot for Maplewood Toyota south ofGu|den'aRoadhouse. Refer to the attached council minutes for both issues. DISCUSSION Parking-Ramp Site Steve K8oDonida Maplewood Toyota, i3 preparing tO apply for his building permit for the parking ramp. Therefore, h8is requesting that the CUP be kept ineffect. Staff sees nVreason not to extend the CUP. especially with his d8Sin8 to begin construction. Open-Parking Site The only work remaining for this site is the planting of trees west of the parking lot. This matter became one of coordination with the city because of the storm sewer installation and pond excavation going on at the time of the Maplewood Toyota parking lot construction. The city and K0c K8CD@nie|3 agreed that he vvOu|d pay the City for the tree planting and the city vvOU|d then plant them once our work iScompleted. The engineering department received this payment for the tree planting. The excavation around the pond has been completed, and the city plans io plant the trees in2O07. Traffic Analysis The city council requested a traffic analysis to see how traffic patterns and traffic volumes on Beam Avenue are affected now that the new County Road D extension is open. Tb[n SOhRweide, Of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. /SEH\, has prepared and submitted this study. Refer k] the attachment. Chuck Ah| the director [f public works, has commented onMr. Sohnw8ide's findings Gsfollows: "The traffic volumes On Beonn/VVa|ter8re returning to pre-County Road D construction levels. \8/8 should continue to see S normalization Vf the volumes as drivers continue k} find the new County Road Droute aSan easier trip. VV9 will b8 installing a permanent speed monitor to a traffic speed sign h3 control traffic. Our traffic engineering recommendation istO continue t0 monitor the traffic in this @r8@. We also are working with K8n0C)lF On inlpnOv8nl8OtS for the B8Grn/TH01inL8rs8cti0n. These may include consideration 0f lane changes that may have 8n impact on driveways and turn lanes. VVe anticipate 820O7 project Lh8Lvvi||oondnV8Lo address this intersection. Ag8in, further monitoring of the tn8MiC in this area and Toyota-related trips is recommended." RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Review the conditional use permit for the two-level parking ramp at the NW corner of Highway 01 and Beam Avenue VnMaplewood Toyota's northerly sales lot in August 20UY. 2. Review the conditional use permit for the Maplewood Toyota parking lot south OfGu|dSD'S Roadhouse in August 2O07. p Toyota CUP Revs 2O0G#2 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Site/Landscaping Plan for Parking Ramp Site J. Site Plan for Open Parking Lot 4. Landscaping Plan for Open Parking Lot 5. Cover Letter from Tom Sohnweidm dated October 25.2000 G. Traffic Analysis from Tom Sohrweide dated September 12, 2006 7. City Council Minutes dated August 8.2OO5 2 N t � t 4 �1 1 1 ] j I I I I I w � Location Map Maplewood Toyota Attachment 2 I -AMD,WAPt P V4 0 91 GULDEN'S F) (I J I t=rNd)WAruX4TAfl3 Attachment 4 N A' t a c hmen i 1 - 5 A 5tH MEMORANDUM TO, . (1inck AhL PE City of Maplewood FROII& Thornas A. Solimcidc, Pj P'rOF DATL October 2i- 2006 B(wii Aventic Neigh borhood Tratfic: SLH No, A-MAPLF0209,00 In a ineuno dated Scptcrnbcr 12, 21006, %%c presented our lindings with regard to traffic VOJUMC Of Bcaul Aveune west of Ifighwav 61 . That mcnio presented that exMinor daily traffic volutne on Beam: Avenue bct-,N the To car dealership and Duluth Street is 2,8W As a to0ow up %No have deteran tied that flic residential neighborhood served by f Avenue is estimated to generate 2,000 vehicle trips per day, This estimate Is based on the appry xmiately 200 sintde tarmly homes in that area. H Sbon Elliot! Hendrickwn Inc, 3535 VudnaiF, Czenrw OrNo, Si, Paul, MN 55110-5196 SEHisanequatupperivnity I www,sehinc.com 1 651A90,2000 1 8003252055 1 651.4997 2150 fax Attacr"rient 6) A SEH MEMORANDUM At your request- >a c navc conducted traffic counts on Beata Avenue, west ot'llighwaY 01, to nionnor cllariCcs in traffic flotk s% ith the realignment of County Road 1.) and the ex(cirsion, of Count y Road D to White Bear Avenue. Historical daily traffic counts conducted by the City and repoAcd to Mn/1)OTSiate Aid arc as follows Ye"a — rAverage Daily Traffic t 1998 2,650 ....... L l o r - - 2005 4 350 For comparison purlx)gcs. we conducted three additional traffic courts in 2006. These counts were taken on Flown Avenue betNvocn the west Toyota drivcway and Duluth Street. The first was taken fklth the icaligncd Count\ Road D open as est ot'Hig hat ay 61 . 1 - he second was taken with the realigned Counk% Road D west or Fliehwav 61 closed for paviug The third was taken with the realigned and ne%\ County Read 13 open to While fkmr Avowe. The daily traffic volumes front those counts areas follows. As can be seen. the most recent count of'2,960 vchict" compares closely to traffic counts; oil this roadv'av frorn 1999 and 2000, It appears that the 2005 Want may have been, influenced by some of the Comity Road D realignment wristruction, as it compares relatively close to the 2006 count with County Road D closed, In addition. we have conducted an operational analysis of the llighaoay 6lfBcam Aacnvic micts, ectIon, and Crud that the most cfficient traffic; lane assignment for eaMbound Btam, Avenuc remains a combination [cft-thru lane and a combination thm-right lanc tld Short Elliott HeWric"on Inc , M35VadrTacs Cvrx tf Z;r $1 Flo. rAN 551 10 'AN Spi ' 1:" - an (qoal Optxxrlor"ty C' , mpvyt,-r I wvw,%*hinc.corn I r`s ! 4%, AIN 1 1300 37f> 205?i 1 6r 1 it ?1 to Attlachment 7 Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All Councilmember Mon n- moved to den the design review bbased on the fact that the use _ nr� ^AnAin�A ��A Aal�+i^m� eir� ^r^ce"A ^�44N- I I IIIIIII! lllilf!ll Subject to road and highway, part westerly of centerline of said highway of South 253 feet of the east 608A feet of the NE 1 /4 of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22. i =11111 IBM= m NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above described conditional use permit because 111111 1 i ! 1 i I UM In. "m I =11MMMIMMIAMrs 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would use minimal adverse environmental effects. 10. Automotive sales and repair facilities are accepted uses in Mi districts subject to appropriate conditions Approval is subject to the fbllo ng conditions (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): 0 A pp fi v " 7: 9 a all MINE -0111KNOOM film q�i Jl!!l 1 1 I'll 1 111111 q�!l "I I 'l l Jill 4 Submit an irrevocable letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of 150 percent of the cost of completing the landscaping and site lighting. 122MMI Councilmember Ressbach 3 yes 11, Maplewood Toyota Expansion (north site — north of LaMettry's Collision-2923 Highway 61) a, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for outdoor motor vehicle storage b, Design Approval WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located between LaMettry Collision and Golden's Roadhouse. The legal description is: 2, The city council held a public meeting on August 8� 2005, to review this proposal. The council considered the report and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission, M conditional use permit because: 8, The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design, 9, The use would cause minimal adverse environmental eff ects. 10. Automotive sales and repair facilities are accepted uses in M1 districts subject to appropriate conditions, 3, The city council shall review this pen in one year, uirements of the shoreland ordinance. I It 3 zm - BERM= ISFAMMI'Ll 14 Agenda Item 16 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review PROJECT: Menards LOCATION: 228O Maplewood Drive DATE: February 14 INTRODUCTION Project Description The conditional use permit (CUP) for MenardSat 2280 Maplewood Drive iS due for review. The city approved this permit to allow Menards to enlarge their building and to amend their approved site plan. Brandon Wilmer, representing Menards, Inc., is requesting that the city council extend the approval of this CUP for at least one year so that Menards has time to complete the city-approved project plans. (Please see the letter on page four and the maps on pages five - nine.) BACKGROUND OD March 27 the city council made three approvals for K8en@rdS. They included: 1. A conditional use permit (CUFo) revision [O enlarge the building and amend the site plan. The city code requires council approval of@CUP revision for an owner to expand or revise @ store Or site for which a CUP exists. 2.Aparking-reduction authorization for 50 spaces. The code requires 451 spaces for the store. WYen@rdSiS proposing tQh@ve4O1 parking stalls. 3. The site and building design plans. (See the maps and plans on pages seven - nine.) Please see the city council minutes starting Vn page 11. On September 11, 2006, the city council reaffirmed the parking reduction authorization for Menards as approved by the city council on March 27, 2006. This approval was to allow Menards to have 50 fewer parking spaces than the city code requires. (See the council minutes on page 16.) DISCUSSION /\S Mr. Wilmer notes iD his letter, K8e0andS has been working OD their final structural and design plans for the approved changes to the store. He also notes that they expect to Sb3d and complete the improvements to the store and site this coming summer. Staff is not aware of any issues or problems at this site. As such, it is reasonable to extend the CUP approval for another year to allow K8eO@rdS time tO complete the Site COD8trUCtiOD and remodeling. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit (CUP) for Menards at 2280 Maplewood Drive again in one year. REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 13.48 acres Existing land use: Menards Store with outdoor sales and parking lot North: Highway 36 South: Single dwellings and Citgo Motor Fuel Station West: Highway 61 East: Countryside VW/SAAB PAST ACTIONS March 28, 1988: The city council approved Menards' CUP and granted a parking reduction authorization. January 23, February 13, March 27 and April 6, 1989: The council changed the CUP conditions. The changes were to clarify the screening fence and storage-rack height requirements. March 26,1990: The council reviewed the CUP. November 14, 1994, and September 11, 1995: The council amended the CUP conditions. April 8, 1996: The council amended the CUP conditions because of a request for a seasonal outdoor greenhouse and plant sale operation. May 20, 1996: The council again reviewed the CUP and directed Menards, Citgo, staff and the neighbors to meet and discuss several issues raised by one of the neighbors. These issues were about the screening fence, engine noises, fumes, parking and cross traffic between Citgo and Menards. August 12, 1997: The council reviewed the CUP again. The previous concerns and problems have been resolved. The council moved to review the CUP again only if a problem develops. Land Use Plan designation: M-1 (light manufacturing) Zoning: M-1 ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 44-512(4) requires a CUP for the exterior storage of goods or materials. Section 44-637(b) requires a CUP for any building or exterior use within 350 feet of a residential district. 2 Section 44-17(G) requires parking for W1en@rds@t the ratios 0f one space for each 20O square feet Of retail or office space and one parking space for each 100square feet of warehouse space. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Criteria for Conditional Use Permit Approval Section 44-1OQ7(@) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based Onnine standards. cup review — February 2OU7 Attachments: 1. Letter dated February 12.2U07 from Menand.Inc. 2. Location Map 3. Property Line / Zoning Map 4. Proposed Site Plan 5. Partial Site Plan G. Partial Site Plan (Garden Center) 7. January 24.2O0G. memo from Lt. 8hortnaed R. March 27.2O0G City Council minutes 0. September 11.2O0G City Council minutes I 1 6 1 1 Attachment 1 Febriiary 12, 21107 4F.: Maplewood Mervards Request for Time Extension Ocar Mr, Roberls: I ain wrium it) give notice ofilic prog C_ g ress of the itriproveincin pro c ' iut for our current !Vlenards Store in Maplewood that was approved by [lie City Council on klarch '27, 2006, We have been working diligently to put to + therthe structural �'Jnd fixturing plans for bosh the _gardon Qcntcr and I'ao;aok imprwements tifthe pvo�ject. AS this Ntorc is onc ot'zo khid, it .k as difficult t(i abide by a unie frame for courplefim- such plans and bckmuse cif this their desq has set us back, We do plan It have our building plans completed and sent oUt for kmilractor bids in Nlay 2007 and would beu'ill eonstruction of' tile garden center area, tentativel in JuIv 2007 aflicr the imi orio� of the "'C asotlal rush is (wcr f this ifterchandise. Once this pluise IS COTTIPICIC, WC WOUld tcIlralivel" begin the fiat adc pliasv ofilic iniprovcnwnts in tic lobcr 2007 anof would try to ha vv cv"x�Ihing Cornpleted by tile end ot'2007' It is to my under.aandivin from readinu the oriLinal MillUtCS (If' tile CitV COUTICII dj1pF0VdI for Mena rd's Conditional ke amendroent to add a garden oxnter that there was a condition that 11111, work lie. SUI)SIa1116a111n Started vo ithin orw vQSr k)fco topproval Or Tile J)Crnlit '"'(Sold bewtuc 111111 and voo(t 'I his ojlC-yCar deadlirre i,, March 27, 2007. Iftlic City determines diat sic have not "SUbstantial ly starled" tile iniprovenlents N� ith tile selledule I have noted above. then Menards Nvould like to seA the appro al ol'the couned Tk) cxtcrid this deadline low one vuilr a-, noted In the same condition rel'ercriced abo\ c from the L\ 27, 1 -006 City Council iiiintacs, resolution 06- o.1-042, Iftlicre is anv addition intorniation or anvihin- c1sc that I can do oi• provide in request I'or tile at'oreinentioned deadline CX[ellSion. please contact ine wsing any ofific inforniatIOT1 provided helow, Thank vou, sincrely, Brandon Wilmer I(cal Estate Proiect Mana-er Mellard, jllc. 4777 Jenard Drivo: L'ail Cl laire, Wl 54710 Phone: 71 5 - 1 0-7' 1 ? 1 I ,vlol)ilo: 7l5-5 7_()Q Fav 71S-876-5960 4777 MENARD DRIVE EAU '_LAsRE, Wl 54703 62 ,5 PHONE 11,715) 876-59' 1 "'AX (71 bj 8, ' 01 DR Attachment 2 WAWA WAVAN SITE -1i B 4 - ti Location Map Mesards 2280 Maplewood Drive GERVAIS AVE Zoning Map Menards 2280 Maplewood Drive Attachment 4 u Attachment 5 - _---- v___ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - APLE OOD, 44 F ( $ �4�s "Dews--, VDICE --� err rr - _---- v___ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - APLE OOD, Attachment 6 l PARKING STALL I H 3.. i H MAPLEWO LASS ININDOWS WROUGHT rRON F SEE DETAIL ` J H x � {t't OVA P# I . � t 120-0. ry pi 4 N Attachment 7 Maplewood Police Departement From Lt. Michael P. Shortreed YWAd CC: Deputy Chief John Barrack Date: January 24,2006 Re. Menard's Garden Center Addition After reviewing the attached proposal on the Menard's Garden Center Addition, I have the following comments and suggestions; 1) Appropriate outdoor lighting should be provided during all times that the Garden Center will be in opera!tion, 2) Outdoor storage of Garden Center and landscaping merchandise should be done thin the secure yard area to the south in order to prevent or at least minimize the number of thefts that may occur, especially after business hours, iu# Attachment 8 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, March 27, 2006 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 06-09 A. [a A L. CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the City Hall, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Longrie. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Diana Longrie, Mayor Rebecca Cave Councilmember Erik Hjelle, Councilmember Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present Present Present Present Present NEW BUSINESS Menards — 2280 Maplewood Drive a. Conditional Use Permit Revision b. Parking Reduction Authorization C. Design Approval a. City Manager Fursman presented the report. b. Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report. C. Rob Geske, the Real Estate Associate managing the project for Menard's, was present for council questions. d. Commissioner Grover provided the Planning Commission report. e. Boardmember Schurke presented the Design Review Board report. Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use permit revision for Menards at 2280 Maplewood Drive to add a 16,505 Square-foot garden center to the existing store: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION 06-03-042 WHEREAS, Robert Geske, of Menards, Inc. is proposing changes to a site with an existing conditional use permit to build a 16,105-square-foot garden center addition on the south side of the building at 2280 Maplewood Drive. The legal description is: SUB TO ESMTS; PART OF FOL TRACTS SELY OF HWYS 36 & 61; EX S 100 FT PART OF SW 1/4 N • CO RD B ♦ PART OF SE 1/4 W • CLIFTON ADD S OF L 107 FT N • S L • BLK 15 OF SD ADD EXTENDED & N • HEINEMANS BELLEVIEW & IN CLIFTON ADD, EX E 240 FT; BLKS 15 & 16 & EX E 255 FT BLK 10 & ALSO W 120 FT OF E 255 FT OF N 30 FT OF BLK 10 (PIN 09-29-22-43-0042) 11 City Council Meeting 03-27-06 WHEREAS, the history Of this conditional use permit revision iS@Sfollows: 1. (]n February 6 the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices tn the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave persons at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The commission also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the conditional use permit revision. 2. On March 27, 2006, the city council discussed the proposed conditional use permit revision. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. N{}VV. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described conditional use permit revision, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code ofordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing Or planned character Of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, d[@iD8g8, water run-off, vibration, general UOSight|iDeS8. S|8dTiC@| interference or other nuisances. 5. The use vvnu|d generate only minimal vehicular traffic on kzoa| mtn*ntn and vvnu|d not create traffic congestion Vr unsafe access Vn existing Vr proposed streets. 8. The use would be emn/ed by adequate public facilities and mervineo, including streets, police and 5na protection, drainage atrun[uneo, water and sewer systems, mnhmo|n and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities Orservices. 8. The use would maximize the preservation nf and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. S. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental efhan[n. Approval is subject to the following conditions: (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): 1. Adherence tn the site plan date-stamped . The director ofcommunity development may approve minor changes. 2. Compliance with the following screening-fence requirements: 8. The property owner shall continue to have and keep, in a maintained condition, wooden screening fences 8Sfollows: (1) The eight-footta\| screening fence west nf1O71 County Road B and running east-west behind 1O71.1O81 and part nf11O1C|ounty Road B shall remain. /2\ All other screening fences that abut the residential |OtS ShG|| be 14 feet tall. 12 City Council Meeting 0G-27-0h (3) All screening fences shall be constructed of vertical boards of the same dimension, color and material. b No material on the storage racks, adjacent to the fence behind 11O1 and 1115County Road B. shall extend above the 14-foOt-t8Ufence. o. No more than 2}6fee[of the 17}6-font-to| interior storage racks shall be visible from the homes to the south that are at street level along County Road B. This excludes those houses that sit higher OD@hill. d. Menards shall be responsible for the safety of the neighbors inregard to the materials stored over the height of the fence. 3. Hours of operation in the storage yard and garden center shall be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 4. An exterior public address system shall not bnallowed. 5. All lighting in the storage yard that is not needed for site security shall be turned off after business 0. The city counc shall review this permit revision in one year. hiqs pot 7. Plowed snow shall be stored away from the southern and eastern property lines to avoid runoff problems on residential property. 8. K8enandn nho|| store all their materials within the fenced storage area. Q. Sanitation facilities shall be provided byK8eD@ndg for the employees. 10. 4�& The proposed building addition and site work must be substantially started within one year of council approval 0r the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 11. The perimeter of the building must be kept accessible for fire emergencies. The applicant shall arrange with the fire marshal for access through the gate behind the building in the case of emergencies. Seconded bv Mayor Lnnghe | COunC|men1berROSSb@Ch moved to approve a parking-reduction authorization for Menards at 2280 Maplewood Drive to have 50 spaces fewer than the code requires. (The city code requires 451 parkinq spaces and Menards is proposing 401 parking spaces.) Approval is because: 1. The required number 0f spaces iSexcessive. KXen@ndS has gotten by, essentially, with the main parking area in front 0f the building since 1888. k8eD@ndS customers d0 not typically use other available parking areas on the site. 3. The proposed garden center addition would need 80 spaces according to the code. However, K8Sn@rdSiS currently using this same area for retail sales and outdoor storage as approved earlier by the city. 13 City Counc Meeting 0G-27-0h As a condition of approval of this request, Menards shall provide adequate directional signage in the parking lot and have employees or others provide traffic control and direction assistance in the parking lot nO all busy shopping days. Seconded hvCQund|memberCave | Cnuno|menlborRonnbooh moved to approve the site plan date-stamped March 8, 2006, and the building elevations date-stamped March 8, 2006, for the 16,105-sauare-foot -garden center addition to Menards at 2280 Maplewood Drive. Approval is subiect to the following conditions: 1. Repeat this review intwo years if the city has not issued @ building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall: o. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to the city engineering department for approval. The city engineering department should review the plans for the possibility of Menards implementing some or additional types of best management practices (iOC|UdiOQ rainwater gardens) t0 help treat storm water on the site. b. Revise the site plans for staff approval to provide enough handicap-accessible parking spaces to comply with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. o. Submit for staff approval, consistent elevations and site plans that correlate to each other, based On the plans date-stamped March 8.2O06. The plans date-stamped January 17.2O0G. and elevations date-stamped February 6, 2006, are inconsistent and difficult to read. d. Submit a revised wrought-iron fence elevation showing that the proposed decorative lights have been removed from the fence. e. Submit a revised landscaping plan showing the following: (1) All existing landscaping OD the north side Of the building. This plan should reflect all landscape materials that are healthy, in poor health, Qrdead. The purpose Qf this plan iStO ensure that all landscaping required previously by the city in this location has been planted and is healthy and thriving. (2) The implementation Of landscaping iDfK)DtOfO[D8@[theOSvvg@[d8DceOte[ If landscaping in this area is not feasible, work with staff to implement additional landscaping throughout the site. (3)Ad least one rainwater garden to help treat the storm water from the site. t Submit to city staff a cash escrow nron irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. 3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying thebui|dinQaddition: @. Menards shall provide a gate and clear access to the sanitary sewer manhole on the site as part of this request. b. Paint any new rooftop mechanical equipment t0 match the building color if the units are visible. (code requirement) 14 City Council Meeting 0G-27-0h n. The city waives the trash-dumoster screening requirement unless the dumosters,would be visible to the public. If K4eD@FdS wants to keep their dUrODSt8rS outside, UlHD they Sh@U provide an enclosure for them using the same materials and color as the building. d. Provide site-security lighting ae required bv the code. The light nnunco.indudingthe|onn covering the bulb, shall be concealed so not to cause any nuisance to drivers or neighbors. e. Meet all the requirements of the fire marshal including: (1) Keeping the perimeter Of the building accessible for fire emergencies. The applicant should arrange with the fire marshal for access through the gate behind the building iDthe case nfemergencies. (2) Installing @ monitored fire protection system. (3) Providing a floor plan of the store and a fire department lock box at the main entrance. t Verify that all existing required landscaping iShH@khv@DdgrOvvmg landscaping if itiS not healthy and growing. Plant all other landscaping required with this approval. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work imnot essential to the public health, safety orwelfare. b. The above-required letter Of credit Orcash escrow iS held by the city for all required exterior improvements. The owner Or contractor shall complete any unfinished landscaping by June 1 of the next year if the building is occupied in the f@|| or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building im occupied in the spring nrsummer. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director Qf community development m@y approve minor changes. G. Signs are not part of this approval. The applicant shall submit any requests for new V[ revised signs to staff for sign permits. Seconded hv Mayor LnnQrie | 15 City Council Meeting 0G-27-0h MINUTES MAPLEWOOH CITY COUNCIL Attachment 9 7:38 P.M, Monday, September `11 2006 Council Chambers, City Hall Meet'ng No, 06-23 2, Appeal of Condition of Approval — Menards (2280 Maplewood Drive) 2. The proposed garden center addition would need 80 spaces according to the code. However, Menards is currently using this same area for retail sales and outdoor storage as approved earlier by the city. in I. The required number of spaces is excessive. Menards has gotten by, essentially, with the main parking area in front of the building since 1988. Menards customers do not typically use other available parking areas on the site, Agenda Item 17 TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Larry Farr, Chief Building Engineer SUBJECT: Safety Expenditure, On-Call Services Agreement DATE: February 20.2OU7 for the February 20 Council Meeting OSHA and other agencies require the City Vf Maplewood tO keep its employees Vpb] date with training. This training includes AWARE, Right to Know /RTP{\. Material Safety Data Sheets (W18[}8), and other job specific training. |O2003.Integrated Loss Control Inc. ULC\ worked with the city to develop and implement employee training, create an instruction m8nV8| and start basic safety program. These efforts included the designing of the electronic (e-Manual) Health and Safety Program. All departments are to use this information as 8 tool to document training, review for needed infornoedi0n, and verify their area is compliant. The e-Manual has had several enhancements that make it very user friendly, has multiple training tabs, and meets the dOcUQnGnt8tiOD r8qUin8[n9Ots of reviewing agencies. Staff is proposing a new contract for services with ILC. This contract is for new training of city employees. There is8 need for |LC to assist the city with this proposed training k} get the city programs back to where we should be and to be within compliance requirements. (See the attached information from ILC and the proposed service agreement from ILC). Staff is recommending: A. Approval for |LC to assist the Cho of Maplewood with the On-Call G8rvio8S Agreement for the Health and Safety Program. This program is broken down into multiple steps that vv8 can chose from aS needed. The total package ifvv8 did all Vf the steps would not RxQ88d $G.5S3.00 dollars which is bi||ob|8 8t$713.0Odollars per month. This is the amount |8nn requesting tobH allowed b]spend. B. Authorize the City Manager to sign the service agreement contract on behalf of the city. (Attorney Chuck Bethel has reviewed this document on behalf of the city). P:misn/on-coU service agreement 2007 Attachments: 1. January 18,20U7 letter from |LC 2. Service Proposal dated January 15.2007 3. Proposed Service Agreement Contract with I LC Attac hment 1 I Integrated Loss Control, Inc. 3030 Centre Pointe Drive - Suite 700 - Roseville, MN 55113 - (651) 633 -6525 Michael H. Holmquist, MS, CSP President January 18, 2007 Larry Farr Chief Building Engineer City of Maplewood 1830 County Road B E Maplewood, MN 55109 -2702 Re: On -Call Services Agreement Dear Larry, Services In: Health & Safety Environmental Affairs Risk Assessment Risk Management Enclosed is the On -Cali Service Agreement which includes a variety of ILC services that can be accessed by City of Maplewood (City) on an as- needed basis. This does not cost the City anything, nor does it obligate the City to use ILC. It only lists services available and the hourly rates and other applicable fees which ILC is agreeing to hold for the Agreement period. Once signed by an authorized representative of the City, the City can request that ILC provide an estimate of cost for any service area or combination of services identified within the Agreement. ILC would respond with a cost estimate in the forth of a simple Service MemelEstimate, which restates the service requested, lists the cost and has a signature line for approval by a City representative. This simple document would be sent (e- mailed) to the City and if agreeable, signed by the City and faxed back to ILC. This serves as our authorization to begin work. All conditions within the original umbrella Agreement are in force on all service requests during the Agreement period. Each service itei,rJtask you would like ILC to assist with would have its own Service Memo/Estimate generated at the time of your request, for your review and approval. The first one, which is enclosed, is for the Fire Department Training already completed (signing and faxing back catches up on paper paperwork). Through an arrangement like the umbrella Agreement, ILC becomes a readily accessible resource to the City, helping when help is needed. Upon final approval, please sign both originals and mail both back to ILC. I will sign and forward an original to you for your files. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact meat 651 -633 -6525. Thank you for your time and continued consideration. Sincerely, Michael Holmquist, MS, CSP President Enclosure: On -Call Service Agreement (2 originals) Return Envelope Alternative Resources Through Quaked Professionals Attac hment 2 I Integrated Loss Control, Inc. 3030 Centre Pointe Drive - Suite 700 - Roseville, MN 55113 - (651) 633 -6525 Michael H. Holmquist, MS, CSP President January 15, 2407 Larry Farr Chief Building Engineer City of Maplewood 1830 County Road B E Maplewood, MN 55109 -2742 Re: Service Proposal - Health and Safety Program Support Dear Larry, Services In: Health & Safety Environmental Affairs Risk Assessment Risk Management First, let me thank you for allowing us the opportunity to submit this service proposal to the City of Maplewood. As you requested, I am providing you this service proposal for services proposed for 2007. As you are aware, ILC had provided routine monthly support to the City up to about one year ago, when as planned, the City began to service their program with internal resources. This proposal is designed to assist the City with catching up on and maintaining selected program initiatives and OSHA compliance requirements. During a prior two year service period, ILC worked with the City to development and/or update and implement the basic safety program for the City as a single employer. One of the original goals set in 2444 was to transition selected responsibilities to each department and their supervisors. That transition has not yet occurred. Now that you have the foundation in place, I see the next step as identifying those activities the supervisors will pickup and manage themselves with support provided by various internal resources and ILC. This upcoming year (2007) can be the transition period the City set out to achieve when it originally retained ILC to help the City back in 2003. Service Proposal — 2407 and Estimated Cost Based on our recent discussion, we identified the following specific goals 1. ILC will provide on -site Employee Right -To -Know (RTK) training to all relevant departments and Confined Space training to relevant departments as was done in previous years. Estimated cost: $1,674.04 (total) (training requested beyond this will be estimated and billed separately) Alternative Resources Through Qualified Professionals 2. ILC will help update and provide the newest version of the electronic (e- Manual) Health and Safety Program. As part of updating the Health and Safety Program and to prepare for the following recommended step (A) ILC would conduct a summary review of the current OSHA programs applicable to the City and their current status. Estimated cost: $475.00 (e- Manual technical formatting up date cost) Estimated cost: $900.04 (review of citywide program, prior to up dating) A. Once the updated e- Manual is on -line, ILC will assist each department, as needed, begin to address the specific compliance programs requirements relevant to each of them (ex. Hazardous materials inventories, harmful physical agent inventory, infectious agent inventory, lockout/tagout procedures, personal protective equipment inventories, respiratory protection, emergency procedures, etc.), using the various forms and instructions found in the e- Manual. This will establish the individual department reference material (field program binder). Estimated cost of Step A: $2,193.40 (initially set at 20 hours and 5 on -site trips have been initially estimated across all departments) 3. ILC will develop and conduct §upz3dw training relating to hazard recognition, helping them understand their responsibilities and identifying tools and resources to help them. This training will also include refresher on newly updated (e- Manual) Safety Manual and how to access information and forms. Estimated cost: $1,971.00 (total) 4. As requested on an individual basis, ILC will can help develop, for selected departments, the following basic training tools (kits) that the supervisors can use to train their employees as their schedules permit (examples, but not limited to): Lockout / Tagout Working Around Earthmoving Equipment Trenching and Excavating Fall Prevention/Protection and Ladder Safety Safe Use of Chainsaws, Trimmers and Chippers Jobsite / Workplace Hazard Recognition Estimated cost: (individual cost estimates will be provided upon request) Each topic will reflect the City's equipment and procedures (if something changes, it can easily be updated), presented on CD and hardcopy. The kit will contain instructions and the required recordkeeping forms specific for the training. This will aid in maintaining uniform recordkeeping across all departments. 5. ILC is available as an on -call resource for all departments throughout a month. Estimated cost: $1,080.04 (retained average of 1 hour per month for 12 month period) Health and Safety Service Proposal City of Maplewood Larry Farr January 15, 2007 Page 2 of 3 Integrated Loss Control, Inc. • (651) 633 -6525 6. ILC will assist the City in updating and implementing its Annual Health and Safety Workplan. Estimated cost: $270.00 (set up and establish as part of the e-Manual) 7. In addition to the above specific tasks, which are to be accomplished at times and dates mutually agreed upon within the service period, ILC is available on an On-Call basis to help as help is needed. The City representative would call ILC and inquiry about what the cost would be to provide the desired service, ILC will provide a Service Memo/Estimate representing the service requested. If approved the City's representative signs the service/Memo Estimate and faxes back to ILC. The authorized work is then performed. Estimated cost: Service Memo/Estimate provided as requested. No cost for On- Call Agreement to be in place. Cost of Service If you elect to approve all the projects as proposed, the total cost is $8,563.00. ILC can spread this cost over a 12 month period, resulting in a monthly charge of $713.00. Our proposal is a starting point, so if you have questions or would like to see adjustments made to this proposal please let me know and we will work with you to try and accommodate your need(s). I hope this information and the proposed approach meet with your approval. I will contact you within a few days, after you have had an opportunity to review this cost estimate and approach, to see if you or others have any questions or what you would like the next step to be. If you agree with the proposal, I will insert this into the body of a renewal Service Agreement (similar to the past Service Agreements with the City) and submit it for your final review and approval. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me at 651/633-6525. Once again, thank you for this continued opportunity for consideration as a service partner to the City of Maplewood. Sincerely, Michael Holmquist, MS, CSP President Health and Safety Service Proposal City of Maplewood Larry Farr January 15, 2007 Page 3 of 3 Integrated Loss Control, Inc. • (651) 633-6525 Attachment 3 AGREEMENT To: Larry Farr Chief Building Engineer City of Maplewood 1830 County Road B E Maplewood, MN 55109 -2702 651- 249 -2053 For: On -Call Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 From: Michael Holmquist, MS, CSP President Integrated Loss Control, Inc. 3030 Centre Pointe Drive Suite 700 Roseville, MN 55113 651/633 -6525 Agreement On -Call Loss Control Services DATE: January 4, 2007 CLIENT: City of Maplewood 1830 County Road B E Maplewood, MN 55149 -2702 CONTACT: Larry Farr Chief Building Engineer PROJECT: Can -Call Loss Control Services AGREEMENT PERIOD: 1- Unless sooner terminated in accordance with this Agreement, ILC and City of Maplewood, will have the following Agreement period: Start date: January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 2- During the Agreement period there will be quarterly evaluations of the services provided and the requests of service to ensure expectations are met. SCOPE: Integrated Loss Control, Inc., (ILC) is a professional Loss Control Services firm which provides quality services in Health and Safety, Risk Assessment/Risk Management and Environmental Services. City of Maplewood can request ILC to provide an estimate of cost for any service area or combination of services identified within the Agreement. ILC will respond with a cost estimate in the form of a Service Memo I Estimate, which restates the service requested, lists the cost and has a signature line for approval by a City of Maplewood representative. This document will be mailed or faxed to City of Maplewood and if agreeable, signed by City of Maplewood and mailed or faxed back to ILC. This serves as authorization for ILC to begin work. All conditions within this Agreement are in force on all service requests during the Agreement period. This Agreement provides ready access to ILC for the delivery of selected, pre - approved, services identified within this Agreement. ILC in essence becomes an extension of City of Maplewood's Loss Control Program. STAFFING: ILC will provide qualified professionals as needed to meet the nature of the service request. SERVICE LEVEL ILC agrees that it will provide services of a high quality in a prompt and efficient manner to City of Maplewood. City of Maplewood On -Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 2 Integrated Lass Control - (651) 633 -6525 It is understood that City of Maplewood has retained ILC as a whole company and therefore will receive the benefit of all applicable resources. 2 ILC staff may need to work off-site at the ILC office on occasion. Whenever ILC staff are required to change a scheduled on-site visit, the affected parties will be notified as far in advance as possible. 4 City of Maplewood will provide ILC staff with adequate office space for those times they are required to work on-site. 5 Standards regarding reaction time to requests for service or timeliness of reports: Upon request for service, ILC will make an initial contact with City of .Maplewood within 24 hours excluding holidays and weekends. Following this contact, a mutually agreed upon date and time for the services will be arranged. 6 Release and timeliness of reports. All reports generated through this Agreement will be made directly to City of Maplewood. Detailed reports will be generated within 10 working days of the receipt of final information pertinent to the report (eg. lab results). 7 The hours allotted for the service period are consumed at the rate of one hour for one hour during normal day shift hours (7:00am through 7:00pm), any on-site labor required during other that this time frame between Monday and Friday, would consume 1.25 hours per contract hour. On-site labor required during weekends would be consumed at 1.5 hours per contract hour. The fixed monthly fee does not increase, only the rate of hours utilization during these non-typical activities. Agreement Administrator. The Agreement Administrator for City of Maplewood is Larry Farr, Chief Building Engineer. The Agreement Administrator for ILC is Michael Holmquist, MS, CSP, President. NOTE: All services provided by ILC through this Agreement are to be coordinated through Larry Farr. CONFIDENTIALITY As a result of rendering services under this Agreement ILC will learn the identity of key employees and will learn about the nature of the workperformed, and results achieved by City of City of Maplewood On-Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 Integrated Loss Control - (651) 633-6525 Maplewood and the procedures, systems, forms, and methodologies utilized by City of Maplewood in its business. This information constitutes confidential, proprietary information of City of Maplewood. ILC shall not use, divulge to, or disclose to any person or entity, without written consent of an officer of City of Maplewood, any Confidential Information unless legally required to do so. In addition to and not to the exclusion of any other rights which City of Maplewood may have, City of Maplewood shall be entitled to seek injunctive relief to restrain any threatened or actual breach of ILC's obligations under this Section. The terms of this Confidentiality section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. As a result of using the services of ILC under this Agreement, City of Maplewood will learn the identity of key ILC employees and will learn about and receive (purchase) procedures, products (hard copy andlor electronic), equipment, forms, and methodologies utilized by ILC in its business. This information constitutes confidential, proprietary information of ILC. City of Maplewood shall not use, divulge to, or disclose to any person or entity, outside the scope of this Agreement, any confidential information without written consent of an officer of ILC. The terms of this Confidentiality section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. ILC IS AVAILABLE TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING GENERAL SERVICES PROGRAM STRATEGIES ILC will, upon request, assist in developing Loss Control strategies, working with top management to determine the level of program necessary to accept, transfer or eliminate risk of loss. ILC will, upon request, provide services such that the following general Loss Control Activities /Services are readily available. HEALTH AND SAFETY COMPLIANCE GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES CAN INCLUDE: Upon specific request, detect and monitor facility conditions that may adversely affect the health of employees and/or violate applicable laws, and to effect or recommend corrective measures. Audit and develop safety programs and to upgrade implemented accident prevention procedures and programs. Assist in reviewing and maintaining records required by federal, state and local laws and those required by City of Maplewood. SPECIFIC SERVICE AREAS: PROGRAM AUDITS - review existing compliance programs and identify those compliance programs absent, making recommendations as needed, (ex: AWAIR, Right -To -Know, Respiratory Protection Program, Forklift Operations, Workers" Compensation, etc.) HEALTH & SAFETY PROGRAM — assist with providing the development, implementation, maintenance and training required to meet federal, state and local regulations (ex: Minnesota City of Maplewood On -Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 Integrated Loss Control - (651) 633 -6525 AWAIR law). EMPLOYEE HAZARD COMMUNICATION — assist with providing the development, implementation, maintenance and training required to meet federal, state and local regulations (ex: Minnesota Employee Right -To -Know law). OTHER PROGRAMS — assist with providing the development, implementation, maintenance and training required to meet federal, state and local regulations. INCENTIVE PROGRAMS - assist with the development, implementation and maintenance as applicable. WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT — assist with providing physical hazard assessment, conduct selected industrial hygiene evaluations (sampling for air contaminants, hazardous substances, harmful physical agents or infectious agents ), ergonomic analysis, noise surveys and general environmental assessment. EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN - assist with the development, implementation, maintenance and applicable training. Ensuring that OSHA and applicable Pollution Control Agency requirements are met with the same program. SAFETY TEAM (Committee) - Assist with the training and facilitating of the safety committee. TRAINING PROGRAMS - Provide training such as, but not limited to: Employee safety training employee Right -To -Know lifting mechanics respiratory protection repetitive motion (carpal tunnel) lockoutltagout hazard recognition first aid forklift operations Supervisory safety training accident analysis job safety awareness job safety analysis -JSA accident investigation motivational techniques ergonomic (worksite design) training and communication skills SERVE AS A RESOURCE - regarding applicable laws and regulations. COMPLIANCE REVIEWS - schedules allowing, participate during regulatory inspections of the company. City of Maplewood On -Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 Integrated Loss Control - (651) 633 -6525 PROVIDE OTHER HEALTH AND SAFETY SERVICES AS REQUESTED Q VERALL RISK ASSESSMENT SER VICES ILC can, upon request, help identify risk exposures and the scope of those exposures, and determine the existence and extent of controls to those exposures. ILC can conduct loss analysis, suggest improvements to controls, and assist in their implementation. Risk Assessment Surveys and Reporting - Evaluate exposures and the scope of those exposures - Determine the adequacy of controls to major exposures - Suggest administrative and engineering improvements to existing controls - Assist in implementing controls to exposures - Develop loss data and analyze losses to determine loss trends - Provide a detailed evaluation for underwriting purposes in a timely manner - Provide photographs and building diagrams - Service for multiple lines of insurance coverage (Workers= Compensation, Fire, Crime, General Liability, Products Liability, Fleet, Builder =s Risk, Pollution) Occupational Injury /Illness Management Analyze past losses to determine loss trends and, the base cause of loss - Analyze existing programs (AWAIR, Confined Space, Lockout/Tag out, Bloodborne Pathogens) - Formulate loss reduction plans through training - Analyze production materials flow, and perform workstation design reviews - Conduct a Multi - Dimensional Job Analysis Assist in establishing or refining loss prevention programs and training personnel in loss analysis Establish Medical Case Management programs that will reduce duplication of effort and assist in cost containment strategies Assist in establishing a Timely Notice of Loss process - Establish an Early Return to Work program that will assist in effectively managing claims Fleet Safety Evaluations Consultation and educational bulletins to assist businesses in establishing comprehensive fleet management programs tailored to their needs. Assist in establishing programs for reviewing Driver selection qualification criteria Equipment controls Vehicle maintenance Accident reporting Accident review procedures Through analysis of motor vehicle accident trends a defensive driving training educational program can be provided to: Target a reduction in accidents Enhance defensive driving skills City of Maplewood ©n -Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 Integrated Loss Control - (65I) 633 -6525 Meet regulatory requirements Promote safety awareness. Property Protection and Fire Prevention Evaluations Develop a property protection and conservation program. Provide basic training for inspection, testing, and maintenance of the automatic sprinkler system. Assist in evaluating operations and help establish emergency preparedness and catastrophe plans. Products Liability Evaluations (when applicable) Assist you in identifying and evaluating your product liability exposure - Formulate recommendations that could reduce the potential for loss or reduce the impact of a loss that could possibly make the product more sellable. Assist in establishing accountability programs, defense programs and help monitor the success of programs currently in place. General Liability Evaluations Our evaluations can help enable underwriting to be more informed on the risk transfer process or exposures to and from the general public. Accident Investigations City of Maplewood management, claim managers and legal counsel call upon ILC to provide the necessary resources to deliver timely, quality accident investigation services. Mold Evaluations Our indoor air quality services are available to assist in meeting your needs relating to identifying, evaluating and controlling potential exposures to molds and other potential airborne contaminates. Workers' Compensation Cost Containment City of Maplewood and the insurance company can, upon request utilize ILC to assist with: I. Disability Management: identify and assist with early intervention and disability management activities which can include: Employee return -to -work opportunities Organizational and administrative functions which can be integrated to minimize costs related to claims Working with medical providers (Managed Care Provider coordination) - Training managers and supervisors - Development of return -to -work policies and procedures - Workers' compensation case screening - Perform factual research to determine the legitimacy of workers' compensation claims brought by employees - Assist in preparing for workers' compensation hearings on litigated matters City of Maplewood On -Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 Integrated Loss Control - (65I) 633 -6525 II. Job Evaluations: help conduct special job analysis to identify: - Health and safety concerns which will aid you in returning injured employees to work - Proper placement opportunities of individuals in jobs that match their physical, mental and emotional make -up, without endangering their health and safety or that of others - Potential work design elements that may result in either acute injury or repetitive trauma disorders - Job accommodations and position description development which can be made to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) III. Educational Services: specialized training and workshops covering such topics as: - Workers' Compensation issues - Developing the knowledge and skill to manage your workers' compensation program - Opportunities for the prevention of occupational injuries and non - occupational injuries which may affect your workforce - Statutory rules, collective bargaining Agreements, policy changes and management information necessary to more effectively implement a workers' compensation program - Back injury prevention presentations which can be tailored to individual worksites ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Environmental services apply to the City as an employer and generator of wastes, etc., related to day to day operations of its facilities and equipment. This service does not apply to the City's responsibilities to provide various services to the citizens of the City. ILC can, upon request, assist the City with the administration of any applicable Pollution Prevention Program. GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES CAN INCLUDE: - Obtain, analyze, and evaluate a wide variety of data in order to assess potential air and water pollution sources accurately. - Coordinate outside services as requested; laboratories, testing firms (stack sampling, modeling, technical expertise relating to permit applications, etc.). - Recommend courses of action to remedy any non - compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Initiate corrective action upon approval. - Ensures required reporting is accomplished in a timely manner. - Train management and employees as necessary. City of Maplewood On -Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 Integrated Loss Control - (651) 633 -6525 WASTE MANAGEMENT Relating to: Ground Water/Run -off, Sewered Waste, Hazardous Waste, Non - Hazardous Special Waste and Std. Industrial Waste ILC can, upon request, provide technical support, applying its technical resources to recognize, evaluate, research and recommend waste managements methods to City of Maplewood, working to assist product quality wherever possible. ILC can serve as an administrative focal point for the coordination of the waste management efforts, the ongoing health and safety program and any overall pollution prevention program. ILC can: 1. Coordinate and conduct those research and development activities necessary for the proper management of wastes generated. 2. Investigate and evaluate waste management methods, recommending options available to City of Maplewood based on its current operations. 3. Investigate and evaluate waste management methods regarding future processes. 4. Ongoing monitoring of the waste stream, noting the impact of changes to processes, etc. upon the waste and its methods of proper handling. S. Follow -up with waste disposal vendors who receive City of Maplewood wastes, verifying the waste disposal method identified to City of Maplewood is being applied. b. Coordinate and work with vendors and outside contractors on special needs, always integrating results into existing or proposed program. AIR EMISSION ILC can, upon request, assist with the ongoing coordination and administration of applicable Air Emission Permits. ILC can: 1. Provide coordination of existing permit and future permit needs. - in the event of a non - compliance issue, coordinate the necessary actions and resources to abate the non - compliance issue, being sensitive to and working to minimize the ramifications of past operations during the non - compliance period. - ensure coordination of any permit conditions, testing, engineering, amendments and reissuance with City of Maplewood's health and safety program and waste management program. - make sure required reporting, testing, and amendments or reissuance are timely. - coordinate the need for outside independent testing companies to conduct performance tests or special testing as requested. City of Maplewood On -Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 9 Integrated Loss Control - (651) 633 -6525 - maintain records and files in a proper and orderly manner. 2. Coordinate, develop, implement and administratively maintain any required operation and maintenance plan. - pull information and resources together - write the plan - develop "forms" for maintenance recordkeeping - train maintenance and/or operations staff on basic understanding of ventilation system and monitoring methods and equipment. 3. Assist with ventilation system design, maintenance and trouble shooting. 4. Upon request, assist with the coordination and/or evaluation of identified planned production increases and the impact on emissions. evaluations (testing, etc.) reporting communication with agency 5. Monitor on an ongoing basis adherence to any rules or permit conditions. 6. When applicable assist with future planning for amendments and modifications - coordinating the permit and related activities with the health and safety program, and waste management program. 7. Help identify opportunities that result from the health and safety program, the waste management program or permit initiatives which improve the indoor air quality (IAQ) resulting in protection of employees and product quality. 8. Provide training as needed to City of Maplewood staff regarding applicable permit or rules: management supervision employees 9. Staff special projects as directed. 10. Assist with meeting monitoring requirements. POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ILC can, upon request, develop, maintain, update and coordinate activities surrounding any applicable Pollution Prevention Plan and ensure that any applicable requirements are met in a timely manner. Applies to City's day to day operations of its facilities and equipment. This service does not apply to the City's responsibilities to provide various services to the citizens of the City. City of Maplewood On -Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 10 Integrated Loss Control - (651) 633 -6525 COST OF SERVICE City of Maplewood will be billed at an hourly rate determined by the nature of the service requested. If applicable a blended rate will be developed from the following: RATES: Senior Professional ........$125.00 - $150.00 (rate is dependent upon technical /professional expertise required) Senior Associate ...............$90.00 Risk Assessment Tech .....$75.44 Safety Technician .............$75.00 IH Technician ...................$75.00 Clerical .... .........................$40.00 Travel ......... ............................the applicable hourly rate Mileage .... ..........................$0.54 cents per mile* *due to possible increases in the cost of fuel, beyond ILC's control, this cost may be adjusted by mutual agreement of client and ILC. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES: - If requested by City of Maplewood that ILC staff have to travel out of town, meals, lodging and mileage would be paid according to the following schedule: Travel status - the applicable hourly rate Meals - Breakfast ($7.00) Lunch ($9.00) Dinner ($19.00) Lodging - actual cost (reasonable accommodations) Mileage - $0.50 cents per mile.* - If requested by City of Maplewood that ILC staff attend a special seminar at a time and place specifically relating to this Agreement, any cost for registration, materials, travel, lodging etc., will be paid as follows: Travel Status, Meals, Lodging, Mileage - at the above rates Registration and Materials - actual cost - With prior approval of City of Maplewood, ILC will be reimbursed for supplies it purchases for activities related to this Agreement. Normally supplies will be obtained through City of Maplewood. - When ILC is requested to use its technical equipment such as industrial hygiene monitoring equipment and various audio visual equipment, ILC will invoice a basic use fee for the period of time the equipment is used. Prior approval will be obtained before such a cost is incurred. Note attached equipment use fee schedule. - Questions regarding expenses will be brought to the attention of Sherri Le or the individual City of Maplewood On -Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 11 Integrated Loss Control - (651) 633 -6525 responsible for the service request. PAYMENT: Payment requirements may vary depending on the nature of the service request, ILC may invoice City of Maplewood at the beginning of a month, at the end of a month for work in progress or invoice on a structured payment plan. In any case payment is due ILC within approximately 30 days of the invoice date. ILC will identify the payment method necessary as part of each Service Memo f Estimate. INSURANCE: ILC shall maintain, at its expense, the following minimum insurance coverage: (a) Workers' Compensation; (b) Commercial general liability insurance (c) Professional errors and omissions insurance ILC shall require its employees to maintain the minimum level of automobile insurance coverage required under Minnesota law. INDEMNIFICATI ©N: ILC shall defend, indemnify and hold City of Maplewood harmless from any and all claims, liabilities, judgements, losses, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) asserted against City of Maplewood by any person or entity, or incurred by City of Maplewood, arising out of any injury, illness, death, property or other loss or damage arising out of or in any manner related to any negligent act or omission on the part of ILC or any of its employees, agents, or independent contractors. City of Maplewood shall defend, indemnify and hold ILC harmless from any and all claims, liabilities, judgements, losses, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) asserted against ILC by any person or entity, or incurred by ILC, arising out of any injury, illness, death, property or other loss or damage arising out of or in any manner related to any negligent act or omission on the part of City of Maplewood or any of its employees, agents, or independent contractors. The party seeking indemnification (the "Indemnified Party ") hereunder shall give the other party (the "Indemnifying Party "), notice in writing within ten (10) days of the occurrence of any event giving rise to indemnification rights hereunder. With respect to threatened or asserted claims of third parties, the Indemnifying Party shall have the right to control the defense of such claim by counsel of its own choosing, provided that the Indemnifying Party receives the consent of the Indemnified Party to the counsel chosen, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld. In any event, the Indemnified Party shall have the right at its own expense to participate in any claim, action or proceeding which is being defended by another party. If the Indemnifying Party within reasonable time after notice of a claim hereunder fails to defend such claim, the Indemnified Party shall be entitled to undertake the defense, compromise or settlement of such claim at the reasonable expense of and for the account and risk of the City of Maplewood On -Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 12 Integrated Loss Control - (651) 633 -6525 Indemnifying Party subject to the right of the Indemnifying Party to cooperate in the defense of such claim at any time prior to the settlement, compromise or final determination thereof. The Indemnifying Party will not, without Indemnified Party's written consent, settle or compromise any claim or consent to any entry or judgment which does not include as an unconditional term thereof the giving by the claimant or the plaintiff to the Indemnified Party of a release from all liability with respect to such claim, provided, however, that should the Indemnified Party assume the control of the defense of a claim, the Indemnified Party shall have the authority to settle or compromise any claim or consent to any entry of judgment, without the Indemnifying Party's prior consent. Without Cause: City of Maplewood or ILC may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part, at any time without cause, a 30 days written notice is not required but appreciated. Should the Agreement end early, an equitable adjustment shall be made to provide for termination settlement cost ILC incurs relating to commitments (relates only to such things as materials, equipment rental, laboratory costs, etc., does not relate to staffing) that had become firm before termination. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: In rendering its service under this Agreement, ILC is and shall remain an independent contractor and neither ILC nor its employees shall be deemed to be an employee of City of Maplewood. ILC shall be solely responsible for all pay withholding, unemployment, and other taxes and all other employee liabilities of every kind and nature, whether in connection with this Agreement or otherwise. ILC shall defend, indemnify and hold City of Maplewood harmless against all tax and related liabilities arising out of ILC's status as an employer. ILCs obligation to defend and indemnify City of Maplewood under this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement by either party for any reason. NO AUTHORITY: Neither ILC nor any of its employees or agents shall have any authority, right, or power to obligate, bind or commit City of Maplewood in any respect, directly or indirectly, to any commitment, Agreement, liability or obligation, except as expressly approved in writing by an authorized representative of City of Maplewood. SURVIVAL OF TERMS: The provisions of the Confidentiality, Independent Contractor, and Indemnification sections and any other sections of this Agreement which are intended to remain in effect after the expiration or termination of this Agreement shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement and remain in full force and effect thereafter. City of Maplewood On-Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 Integrated Loss Control - (651) 633-6525 13 NO ASSIGNMENT: This Agreement is personal to ILC. Neither this Agreement nor any of ILC's rights, obligations, or duties under this Agreement may be assigned or delegated to any other party without the prior written consent of an authorized representative of City of Maplewood AGREEMENT: When signed by both parties, this is the Agreement upon which both parties will abide and which ILC will deliver the agreed upon services. Integrated Loss Control, Inc. Date Michael H. Holmquist President for City of Maplewood Date Title City of Maplewood On -Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 Integrated Loss Control - (651) 633 -6525 14 INTEGRATED LOSS CONTROL, INC. SPECIAL USE FEE (AS OF 1-1-07) INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE EQUIPMENT DAILY FEE W70 Mio ILCO01 Drager Hand Pump ................. _._ ......... .................................... $25.00 ILCO02 Drager Tubes .................................................. ............................ Current Rate ILCO03 TSI Velocicalc ... ........................ .................................................. 60.00 ILCO04 Sound Level Meter ....................................................................... 50.00 ILCO05 Audiodosimeter ........................... ................................................ 50.00 ILCO06 Respirator Fit Test Kit ....................... ........ ............... ................ 20.00 ILCO07 Smoke Current Tubes ......................................................... _ ..... .. Current Rate ILCO08 Air Sample Pump.. ....................................................................... 29.00 Lab Analysis Charges .................................................................. Current Rate Shipping Charges ......................................................................... Current Rate ILCO09 Portable Gas Meter ........................................................... ....... _ 33. 00 ILCO10 Oxygen Meter .............................................................................. 33.00 IL C01 I Digital ThermometerlPyrometer ........................ ..........................33.00 ILC012 Direct Reading CO Meter ............................................................ 20.00 ILC013 Bore Scope ....................................................................... ........... 10.00 ILCO14 Moisture Meter ............... ......................... ...................... ............ 50.00 item no. ILC101 35mm Slide Projector .............................. _ ...................... .......... 22.00 ILC103 Projector Stand ................................................... .................... ... 15,00 ILC104 3M Overhead Projector ...... ........................................................ 27,00 IL C] 05 Portable Screen ............................... ......... .................................. 15.00 ILC106 Easel - Portable ........................................................................... 27.00 ILC107 Polaroid Camera ............................................................... ......... 5.00+1.501picture ILC108 VHS Video RecorderlPlayer .............................. ..........................60.00 ILC110 Video Camera .............................................................................. 60.00 ILC110-1 Digital Camera.. .......................................................................... 10.00 ILCI I I 35mm Camera (24expllhr processing).............. ..........................10.00 +film developing ILC112 LCD Projector and Laptop Computer ............... ..........................50.00 Note: All equipment rates are based on a minimum of 112 day (4 hours) use. This fee list is current as of January 1, 2007. Rates may change during the course of the agreement period. Rates applicable at the time of service will be used. City of Maplewood On-Call Service Agreement - Loss Control Services January 4, 2007 15 Integrated Loss Control - (651) 633-6525 Agenda Item 18 TO: City Manager FROM: Steve Lukin, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Turnout Coats and Pants Replacement Purchase DATE: February 20, 2007 1919KOIKOR Each year we try to replace a few sets of worn turnout gear. At this time, we are asking to replace four coats and four sets of pants. The brand that the Fire Department has been purchasing is Morning Pride which is available from Jefferson Fire and Safety, the rep in this area. RECOMMENDATION I am asking the city council to approve the purchase of the turnout gear in the amount of $6,236 plus $407 tax, for a total of $6,643 from Jefferson Fire and Safety. These funds are in the 2007 budget. Att. Agenda Item 19 TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer Bryan Nagel, Street Superintendent SUBJECT: 2007 Street Striping DATE: February 5, 2007 INTRODUCTION Each year the Ramsey County Public Works Department provides roadway pavement striping services to the various County municipalities. The cost of this service exceeds $5,000.00 and will require council approval. Background Pavement striping is important to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Ramsey County has sent out the yearly notification for pavement striping services for the 2007 season. Ramsey County requests that all requests be submitted by March 15 th Each year when we receive the notification we evaluate the existing conditions and any upcoming projects or maintenance operations. Currently 50% of our striping is done each year. The 2006 cost for striping services was $19,721.26. Funding is requested from 101 -502, fees for service. This is an annual budget item from the Street Maintenance Program. It is recommended that the city authorize Ramsey County to provide pavement striping of roadways at a cost not to exceed $22,000.00. Attachments: 1. Ramsey County Striping Letter RAMSEY COUNTY January 17, 2007 Department of Public Works Kenneth G. Haider, P.E., Director and County Engineer 1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive Arden Hills, MN 55112 -3933 • (651) 266 -7100 • Fax (651) 266 -7110 E -mail: Public.Works@co.ramsey.mn.us Mr. Chuck AN Maplewood Public Works 1830 East County Road 8 Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr, Ali!: ��Wpu JAN 18 2007 3fapfewood Pudfic Works The Ramsey County Public Works Department provides roadway pavement striping services to many of the Ramsey County municipalities. The County is looking at ways to better serve the municipalities in which we provide these services, Tlie tLrst ste tolvarcl'S2rvice t.rlprQveriierit iS tt ldenti:fy a cs3tm�)lcte ii5t'oi rC<idwa5 s to bL 'Lt:''}pe°d i i thcc 200 season. The County is requesting each municipality to submit a list of city streets they would like the County to provide striping on in 2007. The list can be separated into two areas: 1. Those city streets that can be striped at any time during the summer. 2. Those city streets that will require striping after a certain date due to pavement maintenance, utility work, etc. The earlier we can compile this information the better we can schedule our operations. We also ask that when it is necessary to mark for centerline striping, prior to painting, marking for striping be done 2 days prior. If in the event that it is not completed you will be billed for additional costs for remobilization. With this cooperation we will be able to' maintain a coriipeti 'vVtostTo'r bUr costumers. Our main objective is to work more efficiently and therefore, provide a better service to the traveling public and the municipalities we work with. Please submit a list of roadways to be striped and a large map with the roadway highlighted to Dan Soler or me by March 15 -th,. Also; :an the'striping: map please include a cell phone number so in the event of questions we have a contact =person. We would like to be in contact with the person responsible for marking the unpainted roads prior to the striping. Please have that person contact Ken Williams at 248 -0928 We would also ask your cooperation with stop signs that are within the county right of way. Ramsey County has an established practice on the size of signs and the mounting supports. Our personnel are responsible for the replacement of signs within the County right of way. Other agencies replacing signs within our right of way opens the county up to liabilities. It has been noted that in the past, replacement of stop signs has been done without notification and not meeting county standards. Please notify us if you encounter problems with signs. We have given the local law enfcr..ement clispatcli centers the phone nufnbers of our responding pcoplc. Your Ccopi,- raiion is a ppre gated. Thank you for your continued assistance on roadway maintenance with Ramsey Count y. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel fxee to give me a call at 651- 266 -7193. Minnesota's First Home Rule County printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 20% post-consumer content Agenda Item K1 TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles /\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer Erin [@b8ree. Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Desoto-Skillman Area Streets" City Project 06-16" Report on Existing Conditions and Proposed Improvements DATE: February 15.2007 INTRODUCTIONISU M MARY The Desoto-Skillman Area Streets Improvement was ordered at the January 8 m city council meeting. Several questions were brought upbythe council regarding the existing pavement condition index (PC|)for each StPSSt and the proposed improvements, mainly full reconstruction v8naUS partial reconstruction. A nl@p of the PC| rating is attached @|ODg with 8 [n@p showing which streets are h3 be fully Or partially r8t0nGinJc&ed. AbriEf summary detailing the type of improvement planned for each street also has been provided. Findings Streets with 8 PC| rating b8|Ovv 00 are COnSidG[Sd candidates for some tvo* of improvement pn0C8SS. Maintenance strategies include seal coat and overlay t0 extend the life of the street. When maintenance is n0 longer 8 cost effective option, reconstruction becomes necessary. Streets rated 0-50 are in very poor condition and require reconstruction. Streets rated 50 — 60 are candidates for an overlay and streets higher than 00 vvOU|d benefit from 8 seal coat. The majority of streets in the Desoto Gki||no8n area are rated be|Ovv 40 and do not have existing concrete curb and gutter and full reconstruction is proposed. Other streets, such as Clark Street and Mount Vernon, have PC| ratings higher than 40 with existing COnCneL8 curb. Major water main replacement work is necessary and will require that the entire roadway and curb be disturbed. Therefore @COnlp|eb3 reconstruction is necessary. Mississippi Street has o higher rating @t42 yet the curb is in poor condition and the soils are bad beneath the pavement section. A full reconstruction iG planned based On these reasons. Ripley Avenue and Jesse Street are also rated above 4O. These two streets do not have curb and gutter, therefore it is cost effective to include them in the neighborhood project at this time and completely reconstruct the streets. To summarize the proposed improvements, streets that are planned for reconstruction are in poor condition and have o |Ovv PC| rating, have major utility work planned or do not have existing concrete CUdJ and gutter. Streets with existing concrete curb that iSin good condition are proposed tOb8partially r8t0nGinJ{tRd. Overlays for streets in this neighborhood will not be cost effective because the PC|ratings are GL the |ovv end of the range for overlays (PC| rating 40-80), major utility work is needed, or the Gtr88L does not have existing concrete curb and gutter. Sidewalk SmrveyWpdate - Desmko City staff has been conducting meetings with residents along Desoto. Surveys and discussions continue to indicate that the residents remain opposed to the construction of a sidewalk under all scenarios for roadway width oD84O96in favor to00% opposed ratio. The engineering staff iS willing k} recommend a roadway without a sidewalk given that traffic volumes along Desoto are in the 500 — 850 vehicles per day. This r8COnnnn8nd8iiVn includes constructing the roadway width at 26-feet wide, the sL8k] aid nninirnUnn without @ variance. This width is COOaidRr8d the [nini[nu[n 8SSSOti8| t0 allow for vehicles to safely navigate the roadway when pedestrians may b8present. Final plans are being prepared without the sidewalk. Attachments 1 Street Improvement Summary z. pc|map 3. Street Improvement Map City of Maplewood, Minnesota Desoto-Skillman Area Street Improvements City Project No 06-16 SAP No. 138-128-001 SAP No. 138-122-002 Area I Green dashed boundary) Desoto Street (County Road B to Roselawn) - This street has concrete curb and gutter that is in fairly good condition, therefore a full reconstruction is not necessary. A partial reconstruction is proposed for this street that will utilize the existing storm sewer system. Desoto Street (Roselawn to Larpenteur Avenue) - City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. This street currently does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will be fully reconstructed. Skillman Avenue (McMenemy Street to Desoto Street) - This street has concrete curb and gutter that is in fairly good condition, therefore a full reconstruction is not necessary. A partial reconstruction is proposed for this street. Arkwright Street- This street has concrete curb and gutter that is in fairly good condition, therefore a full reconstruction is not necessary. A partial reconstruction is proposed for this street. Clark Street- This street has concrete curb and gutter that is in fairly good condition, however the proposed utility repairs will require the removal of the existing curb and gutter, therefore a full reconstruction is necessary. Mt.Vernon Avenue- This street has concrete curb and gutter that is in fairly good condition, however the proposed utility repairs will require the removal of the existing curb and gutter, therefore a full reconstruction is necessary. Bradley Street (N) - A substantial amount of the existing concrete curb and gutter on this street is in very poor condition and it is more cost effective to replace the entire curb and gutter then to spot repair the existing curb and gutter, therefore a full reconstruction is necessary. Jessie Street- City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. This street currently does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will be fully reconstructed. In addition, utility repairs are proposed on Jessie Street, requiring a full reconstruction. Area 2 (red dashed boundary) Mississippi Street- This street has concrete curb and gutter that is in poor condition, therefore a full reconstruction is necessary. The southern portion of this street will also receive an additional 2' sub-cut and 2' sand sub-base to account for soil corrections due to poor soils (as identified in the Geotechnical Report). Sloan Street (N) - City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. This street currently does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will be fully reconstructed. To account for poor soils (as identified in the Geotechnical Report) an additional 2' of sub -grade excavation and a 2' sand sub -base will be necessary in the south end of this street. Skillman Avenue (Mississippi Street to McMenemy) - City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. A portion of this roadway does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will need to be fully reconstructed. To account for poor soils (as identified in the Geotechnical Report) an additional 2' of sub -grade excavation and a 2' sand sub -base will be necessary. Sloan Street (S) - City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. This street currently does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will be fully reconstructed. Sloan Place -This street has concrete curb and gutter that is in good condition therefore a full reconstruction is not necessary. A partial reconstruction is proposed for this street. Bellwood Avenue- City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. This street currently does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will be fully reconstructed. Area 3 (blue dashed boundary) Kingston Avenue (W) - City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. This street currently does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will be fully reconstructed. Ripley Avenue- City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. This street currently does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will be fully reconstructed. Bradley Street (S) - City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. This street currently does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will be fully reconstructed. Payne Avenue- City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. This street currently does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will be fully reconstructed. Price Avenue- City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. This street currently does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will be fully reconstructed. Kingston Avenue (E) - City policy is to fully reconstruct roadways with concrete curb and gutter on those that do not currently have curb and gutter. This street currently does not have concrete curb and gutter, therefore it will be fully reconstructed. (/') I 1+1 /estern Hills AV E. 4 5 U) kJRI E AV E . - 7 r r 1_1� I LWOOD As AV E. Oi - - ----- ---- - --- --- - !291 0 �� SUMMER ry CT SUMMER LN. . w Cn 171 Cn SU`QMER�l M 171" PL. < RIPLEY 17 0 Oehrline La ke LLJ < n a, GA ® PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT NO SCALE Capital Improment Project for 2007 Desoto-Skillman Area Streets City Project 06-16 FA_ 01 7 m E 0 O O �2 0 <1 LL' AN -- - — - -------- A \/E _,_E� A% / EE All/ ' R E 1 H T E "JR "v,/ H E E L 0 C\ K T I V'13 Fq A- L� 0 0 J L z CY a. , V I j V / NI V < H v �'E ------ . .......... v NV vl� AN� LEGEND .......................... .......................... . ... ... ... ... ... . ............... ................................ ................ .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . FULL RECONSTRUCTION PARTIAL RECONSTRUCTION 1. ............................. City ofMaplewood, Minnesota Department of Public Works Engineering Div(sion STREET IMPROVEMENTS El Kimley-Horn DESOTO-SKILLMAN AREA and Associates, Inc. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE VEST. SUITE 345N TEL NO. (651) 645-4197 ST. PAUL MIWESOTA 55114 FAX. NO. (651) 645-5110 CITY PROJECT 06-16 > <1 < LAURIE T z LLI v L'I DR 1 D' L 11 T ------------------ - - ---- SKI _LMAN KEY L > MT, \/F R N I] /A V, a. , V I j V / NI V < H v �'E ------ . .......... v NV vl� AN� LEGEND .......................... .......................... . ... ... ... ... ... . ............... ................................ ................ .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . FULL RECONSTRUCTION PARTIAL RECONSTRUCTION 1. ............................. City ofMaplewood, Minnesota Department of Public Works Engineering Div(sion STREET IMPROVEMENTS El Kimley-Horn DESOTO-SKILLMAN AREA and Associates, Inc. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE VEST. SUITE 345N TEL NO. (651) 645-4197 ST. PAUL MIWESOTA 55114 FAX. NO. (651) 645-5110 CITY PROJECT 06-16 Agenda Item K2 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: CharleS/\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: KenwoK»d Area Street Improvements, City Project 05-16" Approval of Budget Adjustments and Project Overruns DATE: February 16.2007 The KenvvoOd Area Street Improvement budget has exhausted all funds authorized and additional expenses are warranted to the contractors. A revision to the financing plans is requested to complete the DISCUSSION The construction costs for the Kenwood project have exceeded the estimates approved by the City Council and significant 8xpen38Snenn8intobep8idt0hD8|izethep jeCt. A number of the adjustments are for work where additional funds have already been received from various agencies where the additional work has been authorized, but nV budget increase has been approved. These are 8s noted below: St. Paul Regional Water Services: $11O.0OO (new vvO[kreqU83tSdbvSPR\8XS\ Ramsey Washington VV8L8rSh8d District: $ 10,000 (new work) Driveway program: $ S0 (added payments) Interest Ofinvestments: $ 20,000 (money from fund for project) New revenue to cover expenses: $200,000 The following items are due to additional work on the water system by SPRWS for expenses not covered by 8PRWS required by the 1998 water system agreement; costs for additional sanitary sewer repairs and costs for the final adjustments tO the storm sewer and pVndingsystems and iS money from existing city VVACFUnd: $45.000 (balance in fund end O8=$132.1S3) Sewer Fund: $80 (balance in fund end U8=$872 EUFFund: $15,000 (budget from SO4-512-O0U-440O— consulting fees) Total from Funds: $140,000 The soil problems within the Kemwood Area were significant. The original estimate by the engineering staff included an allowance for a 25% replacement 0fSUboradematerials. Upon beginning the project, itvvoS obvious that this was not sufficient. The final contract will require that nearly 75% of the streets required GVbQnBd9 correction [f the soils. The engineering staff iS continuing final negotiations and review of contractor records; however, it appears that the soils issues will result in an additional cost to the City of $300.000. The staff had reduced the project costs 8L the time o[ the public hearing by$500.00U due Lo the bids received on the project. This was an error given the added work required by the soils n8p|8c8nl8nL and the extra city funds needed. The final project i3opppoxino8te|y5%Overbudget. Agenda Item K2 Budget Adjustments These adjustments need L0b8 added b] the approved project budget. Fundsare available for all Cf the expenses 88noted. The additional $300,000 is being reviewed with bond counsel to determine if additional bonding iSneeded. Engineering staff are currently finalizing previous year's projects vvhSnRth8project budget exceeded the final expenses as noted below: Countv Road D Project 01-15: $330 Haz8kmoVd St, P roj ectO1-10: $208,256 Carlton Street, Project 03-22: $323,107 Gladstone North Streets, Project 04-15: $116,151 Total of projects under budget: $885 his proposed that 8Sthese projects are closed, that the excess funds Letransferred to this project to avoid any future bonding needs. The alternative iSto close these projects, 00vethe9xC8S3fuDdSbJthRdRbt service fund, and then pay for this project's overrun of $300,000 from the debt service fund. Discussion The expenses that have exceeded the estimates are entirely related tn the bad soils inthe Kenwm0danea. The engineering staff did not estimate this work well and underestimated the extent of the problem during the construction process, although we were aware that the amount was in the $200,000 to $300,000 range. VVR were not able io approve budget adjustments until the final construction notes were assembled from the contractor and compared L0 our inspector's notes from the project. VV8 were unable to assemble some inspector notes quickly due to the untimely passing of our lead inspector. The new engineering staff who were working On this project have been assigned training in project management and in8tnJcL8d in procedures to provide Council notice of budget concerns quickly and early in the process. VVedOnot anticipate this type of situation to occur at any time OD future projects. ItiSrecommended that council authorize 8 budget increase as follows: SK. P8U| Regional Water Services: $110 Ramsey Washington Watershed District: $ 10,000 Driveway program: $ 60,000 Interest Ofinvestments: $ 20.000 VVA[|Fund: $ 45.000 Sewer Fund: $ 80,000 EUFFund: $ 15 Transfer from other closed projects: TOTAL $640.000 k} increase the final project budget to $8,213,230 for the K8nvv0Vd Drive Area Improvements, City Project 05-18. Agenda Item K3 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: CharleS/\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: County Road D Improvements (TH 61 to Southlawn)" City Project 02-07 Approval of Revised Purchase Agreement with Xcel Energy and Budget Adjustments DATE: February 16.2007 A revision to an agreement with Xcel Energy for the acquisition of a parcel for the construction of County Road [)iSrequired. Authorization bJ finalize the easement isrequested. Approval Of budget adjustments related to this @CqUiSidOn and two other acquisitions is also rRCOnl[n8OdSd. Discussion On June 12. 2006 the City Council approved an 8gr88nlerd with Xce| Energy for the purchase of parcel of land for the construction of8 newly aligned County Road O. This agreement needs LVU8 revised to finalize the acquisition. Final negotiations have arrived 8t@O acquisition price Of$292.5OO. The City's original offer was at $233.000. but was |ntr88G8d to $285.000 due LV an agreement by ){c8| Energy to pay project assessments. Xc8| Energy was requesting in excess of$400.00U for the property. The appraisal from the City was conducted in2OU4ed$233.0OO. Property values in the area have increased in excess Of 25Y6in the past two years making our appraisal atthe $292,500 value. Approval ofthis aqViSiiiVniG r8C000Rnd8d. Budget Adjustments This acquisition was not included within the approved project budget on December 12, 2005. AddbkonaUy the lowering of the BP Pipeline (approved in Sept 2005) in the amount of $325,000 was not included, nor was the acquisition of the parcel at Hazelwood and new County Road D (which has not been completed). The items were not included as they were reimbursement expenses from MSAS or paid refunds as sales to the adjacent landowner. However, due to financial considerations, the expense must be shown on the project funding, while a similar revenue for the reimbursement (money in — money out) must also be shown. This has held Up processing Of change orders for the project b8C@USethefUndi3ne8r|y exhausted. The accounting adjustment involves increasing the authorized expenditures as follows: XC8| Parcel purchase: $325.00O (includes added survey costs for lot split) BP Pipeline lowering: $325.000 Schreier parcel egmt: Total increase: $850,000 All expenses are covered with Municipal State Aid Funds ($557,500) or payments for the sale of th8Xce| Parcel t0 Country View Golf ($292 Because the final payments from the developer are part OfGD option agreement, funds need tobe authorized from K8SA8 for the entire $2S2 order LVb8 reimbursed from MS/\G over the next 15 years for the acquisition. The total KUGAS authorization iS then the entire $850,000. Bonds were sold in2UO5 for the K8SA8 amount k] cover this expense. There are n0tax dV||8rS involved in this adjustment. Upon 8ppn}v8| of this adjustment, staff will process the remaining change orders for construction Of the project, vvhiChiSS|i0ht|yUnd8[the[}eC2O05 estimates. This action iS an accounting of funds and allows the City to recover funds from our Municipal State Aid Street account managed byK8n[)[)T. Agenda Item K3 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that council authorize the acquisition from Xcel Energy in the amount of $292,500 for County Road [) Improvements, City Project U2-07 Municipal State Aid Street (KUSAS) expenses to cover this acquisition, the lowering of the BP Pipeline expense, and the acquisition 0f the Schreier parcel. Agenda Item K4 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: CharleS/\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: County Road D Improvements (TH 61 to Highridge Court), City Project 02-08 Approval of Budget Adjustments DATE: February 16.2007 The County Road D project bVdg8thaSexhaVstedEd|fundS8ithVhzedandadditiVn8|enp8nses8r8 vvornaDtRd tO the contractors. A revision tO the financing plans is requested hJ complete the project. DISCUSSION The construction costs for the County Road [) West project h8v88xC8Sd8dth88SUnlot8S@pprOvSdbvthS City Council on December 12.2O05bv$18U,000. Ann j0ritv0fth8s8cosLs($170.00O)vver88nU[iootnd when the K88/\G bonds were sold SO the cost overrun iS actually $1U The project oUthOhz8ti0nvv8S not increased for this added expense. An additional added expense, for the purchase ofon easement for the LaK88iry-K8c[}anie|pVndinQ area also was not included in the project UUdgetSuLhVhzaUVn8. All Vfthese expenditures were approved by the Council, however, staff should have adjusted the budget authorizations GS part Of the staff report. A3 the project iSbeiDgc|osed orders L0 contractors are being delayed as the project hJndh8sb88n8xh8USted. The land acquisition expense needs to be made Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS) funding eligible so that the City can be reimbursed for this expense over the next 15 years (new money into the project fund); while the $18O.UOU expenditures need tobe approved 8SK8SA8 eligible in order to access the $1YU,OOOM8A8 Bond funds from k8D[J(]lF. The remaining overrun of $10,000 is available from our MSAS annual allotment. We recently received our allotment notice from Mn[][)Tinto oUrK8SAS construction account (eligible for state aid designated roadways only) in the amount [f $858,000. Budget Adjustments These adjustments were not included within the approved project bVdoetnnOeCennb8r12,2UO5. The items were not included @s they were expenses approved after that date, but are reimbursable from our M8AS bond funds (already S0|d). Due to financial considerations, the expense must b8 shown onthe project funding, while a similar revenue for the reimbursement (money in — money out) must also be shown. This has held up processing 0f change orders for the project beo8uaethefundi3neor|y exhausted. The accounting adjustment involves increasing the authorized expenditures as follows: Additional construction expenses: g180,000 LoK8etn/ K8oDonka|pond: Total increase: $305.000 All expenses are covered with Municipal State Aid Funds ($305.000). The total MSAS authorization iSthe entire $305 although bonds were sold iD2O05 for the PWS/\S amount to cover this expense. There are no tax dollars involved in this GdiUSLnnHnt. Upon approval of this adiVsLnn8nL, staff will process the remaining change orders for construction of the project, which is over the Dec 2005 RsUnn8L8S. This action Agenda Item K4 iG8n accounting [f funds and allows the City to recover funds from our Municipal State Aid Street account managed by MnDOT. It is recommended that council authorize a budget increase of $305,000 in Municipal State Aid Street (K8SAS) expenses [0 cover the added construction expenses and acquisition nf the L8Metry—McDaniel pOndin0 area for the County Road [} VV9St |[npn}v8nnRntS /TM 61 — ||ighridgG Court), City Project 02-08. Agenda Item Ll AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Ch8rleS/\hl Public Works Director/City Engineer Erin L@beree Assistant City Engineer Michael Thompson, Civil Engineer I SUBJECT: Heights Ave Cul~de~Sac, City Project 07-06, Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Feasibility Report DATE: February 12.2007 INTRODUCTION The residents of the Carver Heights neighborhood are requesting that the City Council consider making the temporary cul-de-sac at the south end of Heights Avenue (south end of Dorland Road) permanent. In order to make the cul-de-sac permanent a new plat map must be created and public right-of-way acquired from residents near the Cu|-d8-SGC. Also, the Cu|-d9-S@C would need tOb9 re-constructed tO8 standard city street section toinclude curb and gutter. Background The Carver Heights final plat was recorded in January of 1988 and consists of the following streets: [JOr|GOd Road, Overlook Circle, and Heights Avenue. The Carver Heights development was built with fULVn8 road extension in mind. As such, 8 100-fo[t diameter temporary cul-de-sac was constructed GL the end of Heights Avenue and a temporary easement blanketed over the cul-de-sac. Currently nnpublic right-of-way exists over the existing cul-de-sac areas that are located outside of the dedicated street right- of-way. If the cul-de-sac is to become permanent, right-of-way acquisition from residents may be in order. City staff has reviewed the petition from the Carver Heights neighborhood residents. The letter requests vacation Of easements On the CoP8r property, but there are in fact nV dedicated road easements 8tthis time on the existing CoP8rproperty. City staff would need to carry out 8 feasibility study in order tofully address the impacts Cf making the Cu|-d8+Sacpermanent. |f the project do8snnUv8h]nw8nj.U|Unn8t8|y those residents who benefit from the improvement would be assessed for all costs associated with the project from feasibility through C0OStnJCtiOD. The COSt of the feasibility study vvOu|d b8cOQD8 8 project COSt as this pnJQnBnn proceeds. This roadway was originally planned LV extend into the Carver Crossing (CVP8r) development. Staff does not foresee any scenarios where this roadway will be extended. Th8CoP8r development originally had agreed to pay the costs of this work. AS that project ho3beende|8yed.the resident petition requires that the City either deny the petition or proceed with a study. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that council adopt the attached resm|ution@uthOdizingprep8RatiODOf@feasibi|itvr9p0rt regarding impacts and costs of making the temporary cul-de-sac permanent. A$5.UO0.O0 budget will need to be established to complete the feasibility study. Attachment: 1. Resolution 2. Resident Petition 3. Maps RESOLUTION VVHEREAS, it is proposed to nn8he inlprVv8nn8nLs to Height Avenue within the Carver Heights plat, City Project 07'U8,8ndt08ss8ssth8b8nefit8dpn}pedvfor8Uor8pVrtiVnVfLheC0StVfLheinnpr8venn8nL. pursuant tn Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL DF MAPLEVVO{}D. That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that hei3instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement iS necessary, cost effective and feasible and 8sk} whether it should best b8made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as PSC000RnU8d. FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $5,000 are appropriated to prepare this feasibility report. I - I k, / 44 CILIA11 �e R. Dear Mayor and City Council, We are citizens of the Carver Heights neighborhood in the city of Maplewood. We present this petition to you, our city government representatives, as a formal request to vacate the easement through the CoPar properties at the end of Heights Avenue and subsequently declare permanent the temporary cul-de-sac at that location. We feel there are good reasons to request this action. The recent proposal for development has shown that if the property is developed there is no intention to utilize this easement and the developer has already asked to have the easement vacated. The most important reason is for the safety of the many young children in our neighborhood, which is our primary concern. We also feel that this action would maintain the private character and environmental features of the neighborhood as it was intended and presented to the property owners. Thank you, Respectfully submitted by the undersigned. NAME ADDRESS SIG TURF A a, eclek Ax. k/- -T L ccj 6oa F r , �_T e Q �1 G land 0 - 54 (I L(AA VO J_ - 7 1 233F� 0 ell 1222L C2 Ct--. L44 6U -1 C' W rkou V g IA Z 27 ov�/ fl t liqlZ C-CIA ce, Carver Heights Petition Page 2 Dame Address Sign -e G�lJ�3�t 10 ` 1 i 1 C1 C7 F` c 6 - 4 al ft 4 4 pZ tri 6 A (2- j f f J // f /' / f I t a t ✓ � , l a`J k 9d ' S J' -- fl t r r'^J� �. . v l./ :J` �, i �i r �1 l "`� j i.. l � kC.., . � - .- _"" C,! k L' i f t r Lt� �Lt sc wl nY r i of `S - xz L'tiri l'bz'va5 }v antra t+ nnMS u n wtt - m^as- . --- bb➢frZf -- --� —� -- 9t5'SCt-- � -- 3_xa.ao-.49. -- 3 ..2tirAb.68 S v S• ^tV � C� � r °vti 3 s3 � e � 9 a t, ° � • .z5a s a .aG•m g T Cr3 a,� NJ . Sr6v:r r .. � aL AtC0.99.96x �L u ^ � M1 Lf a '� � apr,b pG1 til in X fl C\iy a NIO RAO a t� g� 7 fAA9.9U.94!i C3 w N.o ° G.00 06H .o9abi - a9'9ai # D i a r$ 8 Cn ro fl a9a � z # � Doom m w a a 9oaaa � � a _ � a I6a9.90.96x' MR9A9Aak pp 3mmv -- 00'039-- �rn..00.GO.osu al1NMAV y zz ro ro z •i`az'a astMta w anr a o.,;f mwn c *'tl'� '^ w H N 4 CARVER HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. SOURCES: Ramsey County (January 29, 2007), The Lawrence Group;January 29, 2007 for County parcel and property records data, January 2007 for commercial HEIGHTS AVE CUL -DE -SAC DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. SOURCES: Ramsey County (January 29, 2007), The Lawrence Group;January 29, 2007 for County parcel and property records data, January 2007 for commercial Agenda Item L2 TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles /\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Kummer, Civil Engineer 11 SUBJECT: Rainbow-Maple Ridge Shopping Mail Driveway, City Project 07-03 Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study DATE: February 14, 2007 INTRODUCTION/SU M MARY Maple Ridge Shopping Mail k5 located on the northwest corner of the intersection Vf White Bear Avenue and G8n/8iG Avenue (refer LO exhibit 4J. Rainbow Foods, a main mail tenant, is located Vn the south end of the shopping mall. Modifications to the loading dock/truck driveway access from Gervais Avenue are needed. The Council will be asked k} appropriate funds for @ feasibility study. Background Maple Ridge has 3 driveway entrances along its G8maiSAvenue frontage: Ahght-in/h0ht+Jut access 8t 2OU feet, 8 full access 8t5O0 feet, and 8 loading dock/truck full access 8t0OO feet — all distances measured west of the intersection of Gervais and White Bear Avenue (refer to exhibit B). There iS8nexisting sidewalk (of both concrete and asphalt surfacing) along the north side of Gervais Avenue that cuts through the three access points. At the truck access (the westernmost entry) there have been problems with large trucks cutting off the two radius points of the driveway access and driving over the curb and sidewalk in order tO make the sharp radius turn into the loading dock drive entry (refer to attached photographs). After the Public Works staff had been alerted tn the problem Uy residents, engineers examined the problem and determined that improvements were needed. MeGsVn8nl8ntS of the acLV8] radius of tire track in the snow compared to the eastern radius of the driveway entry indicated that the driveway radii are severely deficient for the size [f trucks that are utilizing the access. The pedestrian ramps for the sidewalk do not appear to be within Americans with Disabilities Act (4DA) tolerances. There is also 8 hydrant located approximately 5haet east ofthe driveway which will need to be relocated in order to minimize the possibility of the hydrant being damaged by a turning vehicle. Modifications to the existing driveway and walkway are n88d8U to improve pedestrian safetv, increase vehicle mobility into the 8CCesS decrease damage tO the existing bOU|Rv@nd and possible damage tOthe hydrant near the driveway. Budget Impact Due b} the relatively small size of the project, a project budget of $2,500 would be established for a feasibility study. All project costs will be assessed to the property owner. Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the preparation 0fthe feasibility study for the Rainbow-Maple Ridge Shopping Mall Driveway, City Project 07-03. Attachments: I . Resolution z. Ramsey County GIS Snapshot ofSite o. Aerial Photo mSite 4. Photographs of Driveway RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to the Rainbow-Maple Ridge Shopping Mail Driveway, City P j8ctU7-O3 improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that heisinstructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement iS necessary, cost effective and feasible and 8s to whether iL should best b8made 8s proposed 0rin connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement aS recommended. FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $2,500 are appropriated to prepare this feasibility report. 41 iv I a a ' _ k C 1� W W 1� TT ^ yl h W� n W m Q� Q� N N J y am, J i. J � O J � w � � J � � V u h_ N y i C$ O � J y c3 H y SC-i J G s � � J h ti G J T r n J V n v 3 c j r.� P �N w N U Agenda Item L3 MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Sh8mn Flnvv8|[A|CP. Planner SUBJECT: Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant Agreement DATE: February 21.20O7 for the February 2S City Council Meeting C)D December 13.20O8, the Metropolitan CouOC|8pprov8d$8.8n0iUkJDiDLkxab|8 Communities grants L0 ten projects insevencides. Thed8veloprnRnt/red9velOpment projects all demonstrated a component of land use that connect development with transit, intensify land uses, connect housing and employment, provide a mix of housing affordability, and provide infrastructure to connect communities and attract investment. The City Of Maplewood was awarded the largest grant 0f the ten projects including $1.8 million to fund Phase I public improvements in the Gladstone Redevelopment area to include the reconstruction Of Frost Avenue from MiQhvv8y 01 t0 Ph8|Rn Place, 8 roundabout otthe intersection Of Frost Avenue and East Shore Drive, aidevv8|ka, decorative street lighting, and landscaping. |n addition tV the roadway improvements are the construction of stormwater treatment ponds and devices to treat stormwater that is currently discharged directly to Lake Phalen without any form of treatment. The Metropolitan Council has submitted a grant agreement to the City of Maplewood (attached). The agreement spells out the authorized use [f the grant funds and conditions Vf the grant. The Metropolitan Council has requested that authorized officials sign the grant and that the city forward the agreement to them for execution. Approve the attached Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant Agreement showing the City CfK8op|evv0od's intent to comply with the Livable Communities Demonstration Account Program contract requirements for the grant award of $1.8 million for the Phase I capital improvements in the Gladstone Neighborhood. Attachment: Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant Agreement DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM GRANTEE: City of Maplewood GRANT NO. SG006-168 PROJECT: Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment GRANT ANIOUNT: $1,800,000.00 FUNDING CYCLE: Fall 2006 COUNCIL ACTION: December 13, 2006 END DATE: December 31, 2008 METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT GRANT AGREEMENT THIS GRANT AGREEMENT ( "Agreement'') is made and entered into by the Metropolitan Council ("Council" and the Municipality, County or Development Authority identified above as "Grantee." WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.251 creates the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, the uses of which fund must be consistent with and promote the purposes of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Council's Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes sections 473.251 and 473.253 establish within the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund a Livable Communities Demonstration Account and require the Council to use the funds in the account to make grants or loans to municipalities participating in the Local Housing Incentives Program under Minnesota Statutes section 473,254 or to Counties or Develop- ment Authorities to fund the initiatives specified in Minnesota Statutes section 473.25(b) in Participating Municipalities and WHEREAS, the Grantee is a Municipality participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account program under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254, a County or a Development Authority; and WHEREAS, the Grantee seeks funding in connection with an application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant program funds submitted in response to the Council's notice of availability of grant funds for the **Funding Cycle" identified above and will use the grant funds made available under this Agreement to help fund the project identified in the application; and WHEREAS, the Council awarded Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant program funds to the Grantee subject to the Council's eminent dornain policy and any terms, conditions and clarifications stated in its Council Action, and with the understanding that the project identified in the application will proceed to completion in a timely manner and all grant funds will be expended prior to the "End Date" identified above. NOW THEREFORE, in reliance on the above statements and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Agreement, the Grantee and the Council agree as follows: Page 1 of 8 Pages DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM I. DEFINITIONS 1.01 Definition of Terms. The terms defined in this paragraph have the meanings given them in this paragraph unless otherwise provided or indicated by the context. (a) '*Council .fiction" means the action or decision of the governing body of the Metropolitan Council, on the meeting date identified at Page I of this Agreement, by which the Grantee was awarded Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds. (b) Count))" means Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and Washington Counties. (c) "Developnient Authority" means a statutory or home rule charter city, a housing and redevelop- ment authority, an economic development authority, or a port authority in the Metropolitan Area. (d) "Metropolitan Area" means the seven-county metropolitan area as defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121, subdivision 2. (e) "Municipality" means a statutory or home rule charter city or town participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254. (f) "Participating illiinicipafity ineans a statutory or home rule charter city or town which has elected to participate in the Local Housing Incentive Account program and negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for the Municipality pursuant to Mirinesota Statutes section 473.254. 2.01 Total Grant Amount. The Council will grant to the Grantee the "Grant Amount" identified at Page I of this Agreement which shall be funds from the Livable Communities Demonstration Account of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Grantee understands and agrees that any reduction or termination of Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds made available to the Council may result in a like reduction in the Grant Amount made available to the Grantee. 2.02 Authorized Use of Grant Funds. The Grant Amount made available to the Grantee under this Agreement shall be used only for the purposes and activities described in the application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds. A project summary that describes eligible uses of the grant funds as approved by the Council is attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as Attachment A. Grant funds must be used to fund the initiatives specified in Minnesota Statutes section 473.25(b), in a Participating Municipality. Grant funds must be used for costs directly associated with the specific proposed activities and shall not be used for "soft costs" such as: administrative overhead; activities prior to the date of the grant award; travel expenses; legal fees; permits, licenses or authorization fees; costs associated with preparing other grant proposals; operating expenses; planning costs, including comprehensive planning costs; and prorated lease and salary costs. The Council shall bear no responsibility for cost overruns which may be incurred by the Grantee or others in the implementation or performance of the project activities. 2.03 Eminent Domain Restrictions. On January 25, 2006 the Council adopted a policy that restricted the use of LCA grant funds on projects when eminent domain authority was used to Page 2 of 8 Pages DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM acquire private property for ``economic development" purposes in connection with the projects. The Council's policy defined the term "economic development* for LCA program purposes and covers the time period fi-om January 25, 2006 to June 28, 2006. On June 28, 2006 the Council adopted a revised eminent domain policy that is consistent with the statutory definitions and restrictions contained in Minnesota Statutes chapter 117 as amended (effective May 20, 2006) during the 2006 legislative session. The revised policy applies to LCA grant awards and grant agreements made on or after June 28, 2006. The Council's January 25, 2006 and June 28, 2006 eminent domain policies are available online at: http://www.metrocouncii.org/services/livcomm/EminentDomainPolicy.htm. (a) If a notice of petition was served between January 25, 2006 and May 20, 2006 in connection with the Grantee's project (or any component of the project) for which grant funds were awarded, the grant funds may not be used to fund or support the project unless the project: (1) would have been eligible under the Council's January 25, 2006 policy; or (2) qualifies for an exemption under Minnesota Statutes section 117.012, subdivision 3 or 2006 Minnesota Laws chapter 214, section 22, clauses (b) through (e). (b) If a notice of petition was served on or after May 20, 2006 in connection with the Grantee's project (or any component of the project) for which grant funds were awarded, the grant funds may not be used to fund or support the project unless the project qualifies for an exemption under Minnesota Statutes section 117.012 subdivision 3 or 2006 Minnesota Laws chapter 214, section 22, clauses (b) through (e). 2.04 Loss of Grant Funds. The Grantee agrees to remit to the Council in a prompt 111anner: any unspent grant funds, including any grant funds that are not expended prior to the End Date identified at Page I of this Agreement; any grant funds that are not used for the authorized purposes; and any interest earnings described in Paragraph 2.06 that are not used for the purposes of implementing the project activities described in Attachment A. For the purposes of this Agreement, grant funds are ``expended" prior to the End Date if the Grantee pays or is obligated to pay for expenses of eligible project activities that occurred prior to the End Date and the eligible expenses were incurred prior to the End Date, Unspent or unused grant funds and other funds remitted to the Council shall revert to the Council's Livable Communities Demonstration Account for distribution through application processes in future Funding Cycles. The Grantee agrees to comply with any "business subsidy' requirements of Minnesota Statutes sections 116J.993 to 116J.995 that apply to the Grantee's expenditures or uses of the grant funds. 2.05 Payment Request Forms and Disbursements. The Council will disburse grant funds in response to written disbursement requests submitted by the Grantee and reviewed and approved by the Council's authorized agent. Written disbursement requests shall be made - using payment request forms, the form and content of which will be determined by the Council. Payment request and other reporting forms are available online at: http://www.metrocouncii.org/servicesllivcomm/LCAresources.htm. Disbursements prior to the performance of a project activity will be subject to terms and conditions mutually agreed to by the Council's authorized agent and the Grantee. Subject to verification of each payment request form and approval for consistency with this Agreement, the Council will disburse a requested amount to the Grantee within two (2) weeks after receipt of a properly completed payment request form. Page 3 of 8 Pages DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM 2.06 Interest Earnings. If the Grantee earns any interest or other income from the grant funds received from the Council under this Agreement, the Grantee will use the interest earnings or income only for the purposes of implementing the project activities described in Attachment A. 2.07 Effect of Grant. Issuance of this grant neither implies any Council responsibility for contamination, if any, at the project site nor imposes any obligation on the Council to participate in any pollution cleanup of the project site if such cleanup is undertaken or required. Ill. ACCOUNTING, AUDIT AND REPORT REQUIREMENTS 3.01 Accounting and Records. The Grantee agrees to establish and maintain accurate and complete accounts and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of all -rant funds received from the Council. Notwithstanding the expiration and terriiination provisions of Paragraphs 4.01 and 4.02, such accounts and records shall be kept and maintained by the Grantee for a period of six (6) years following the completion of the project activities described in Attachment A or six (6) years following the expenditure of the grant funds, whichever occurs earlier. Accounting methods shall be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 3.02 Audits. The above accounts and records of the Grantee shall be audited in the same manner as all other accounts and records of the Grantee are audited and may be audited or inspected on the Grantee's premises or otherwise by individuals or organizations designated and authorized by the Council at any time, following reasonable notification to the Grantee, for a period of six (6) years following the completion of the project activities or six (6) years following the expenditure of the gr ant 'I rant funds, whichever occurs earlier. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 16C.05, subdivision 5, the books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Grantee that are relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the Council and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six (6) years. 3.03 Report Requirements. The Grantee will report to the Council on the status of the project activities described in Attachment A and the expenditures of the grant funds. Submission of properly completed payment request forms required under Paragraph 2.05 will constitute periodic status reports. The Grantee also must complete and submit to the Council within sixty (60) days after the termination or expiration of this Agreement a final monitoring and evaluation report, the form and content of which report will be determined by the Council. This reporting requirement shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 3.04 Environmental Site Assessment. The Grantee represents that a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment or other envirormiental review has been or will be carried out, if such environmental assessment or review is appropriate for the scope and nature of the project activities funded by this grant, and that any environmental issues have been or will be adequately addressed. IV. AGREEMENT TERM 4.01 Term. This Agreement is effective upon execution of the Agreement by the Council. Unless terminated pursuant to Paragraph 4.02, this Agreement terminates on the "End Date" identified at Page I of this Agreement and ALL GRANT FUNDS NOT EXPENDED BY THE GRANTEE PRIOR TO THE END DATE SHALL REVERT TO THE COUNCIL. Page 4 of '8 Pages DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM 4.02 Termination. This Agreement inay be terminated by the Council for cause at any time upon fourteen (1 4) calendar days' written notice to the Grantee. Cause shall mean a material breach of this Agreement and any amendments of this Agreement. If this Agree rent is terminated prior to the End Date, the Grantee shall receive payment on a pro rata basis for eligible project activities described in Attachment A that have been completed prior to the termination. Termination of this Agreement does not alter the Council's authority to recover grant funds on the basis of a later audit or other review, and does not alter the Grantee's obligation to return any grant funds due to the Council as a result of later audits or corrections. If the Council determines the Grantee has failed to coiriply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the applicable provisions of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, the Council may take any action to protect the Council's interests and may refuse to disburse additional grant funds and may require the Grantee to return all or part of the grant funds already disbursed. 4.03 Amendments and Extensions. The Council and the Grantee may arnend this Agreement by mutual agreement. Amendments or extensions of this Agreement shall be effective only on the execution of written amendments signed by authorized representatives of the Council and the Grantee. The End Date may be extended beyond the original End Date identified at Page I of this Agreement if, AT LEAST THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE END DATE, the Grantee's authorized representative submits a written extension request that (a) states the reason for the extension request; (b) identifies a new completion date, which shall not exceed one year beyond the original End Date; and (c) describes in reasonable detail any proposed changes to the project activities and budget. THE END DATE MAY BE EXTENDED ONLY ONCE. THE PERIOD OF THE ONE -TIME EXTENSION SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE (1) YEAR BEYOND THE ORIGINAL END DATE IDENTIFIED AT PAGE I OF THIS AGREEMENT. Any additional extension requests from the Grantee must be approved by the governing body of the Metropolitan Council. V. GENERAL PROVISIONS 5.01 Equal Opportunity. The Grantee agrees it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local civil rights commission, disability, sexual orientation or age and will take affirmative action to insure applicants and employees are treated equally with respect to all aspects of employment, rates of pay and other forms of compensation, and selection for training. 5.02 Conflict of Interest. The members, officers and employees of the Grantee shall comply with all applicable state statutory and regulatory conflict of interest laws and provisions. 5.03 Liabifit) Subject to the limitations provided in Minnesota Statutes chapter 466, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Grantee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Council and its members, employees and agents from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from the conduct or implementation of the project activities funded by this grant, except to the extent the claims, darnages, losses and expenses arise from the Council's own negligence. Claims included in this indemnification include, without limitation, any claims asserted pursuant to the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA), Minnesota Statutes chapter 115B, the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended, United States Code, Page 5 of 8 Pages DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM title 42, sections 9601 el seq., and the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) as amended, United States Code, title 42, sections 6901 et seq. This obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or otherwise reduce any other right or obligation of indemnity which otherwise would exist between the Council and the Grantee. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This indemnification shall not be construed as a waiver on the part of either the Grantee or the Council of any immunities or limits on liability provided by Minnesota Statutes chapter 466, or other applicable state or federal law. 5.04 Acknowledgments. The Grantee shall acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the Council in promotional materials, press releases, reports and publications relating to the project activities described in Attachment A that are funded in whole or in part with the grant funds. The acknowledgment should contain the following language: Financing C o fir this project was provided hv the 11 tropolitan Council ilkletropolitan Livable Connnunities Fund. Until the project activities funded by this Agreement are completed, the Grantee shall ensure the above acknowledgment language, or alternative language approved by the Council's authorized agent, is included on all signs located at project or construction sites that identify project funding partners or entities providing g financial support for the project. 5.05 Permits, Bonds and Approvals. The Council assumes no responsibility for obtaining any applicable local, state or federal licenses, pen bonds, authorizations or approvals necessary to perform or complete the project activities described in Attachment A. 5.06 Subgrantees, Contractors and Subcontractors. The Grantee shall include in any subgrant, contract or subcontract for project activities appropriate provisions to ensure subgrantee, contractor and subcontractor compliance with all applicable state and federal laws and this Agreement. Along with such provisions, the Grantee shall require that contractors and subcontractors performing work covered by this grant comply with all applicable state and federal Occupational Safety and Health Act regulations. 5.07 Stormwater Discharge and Water Management Plan Requirements. If any grant funds are used for urban site redevelopment, the Grantee shall at such redevelopment site meet or require to be met all applicable requirements of: (a) federal and state laws relating to stormwater discharges including, without limitation, any applicable requirements of Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, parts 122 and 123; and (b) the Council' 2030 ff Resources A Policy Play and the local water management plan for the jurisdiction within which the redevelopment site is located. 5.08 Authorized Agent. Payment request forms, written reports and correspondence submitted to the Council pursuant to this Agreement shall be directed to: Metropolitan Council Attn: LCA Grants Administration 390 Robert Street North Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-1805 Page 6 of 8 Pages DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM 5.09 Warranty of Legal Capacity. The individuals signing this Agreement on behalf of the Grantee and on behalf of the Council represent and warrant on the Grantee's and the Council's behalf respectively that the individuals are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on the Grantee's and the Council's behalf respectively and that this Agreement constitutes the Grantee's and the Council's valid, binding and enforceable agreements, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantee and the Council have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. This Agreement is effective on the date of final execution by the Council. By Title Date By Title Date SGOOGMDEMO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By Director, Housing and Livable Communities Date OV07 Page 7 n 8 Pages DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM ATTACHMENT A APPLICATION FOR LIVABLE CO.NIMUNNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT FUNDS This attachment comprises this page and the succeeding pa ' ge(s) which contain(s) a summary of the proposed project identified in the application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds submitted in response to the Council's notice of availability of Demonstration Account grant funds for the Funding Cycle identified at Page I of this Agreement. The summary reflects the proposed project for which the Grantee was awarded grant funds by the Council Action, and may reflect changes in project ftinding, sources, changes in funding arnounts, or minor changes in the proposed project that occurred subsequent to application submission. The application is incorporated into this Agreement by reference and is made a part of this Agreement as follows. If the application or any provision of the application conflicts with or is inconsistent with the Council Action other provisions of this Agreement, or the project summary contained in this Attachment A. the t erms, descriptions and dollar amounts reflected in the Council Action or contained in this Agreement and the project summary shall prevail. For the purposes of resolving conflicts or inconsistencies, the order of precedence is: (1) the Council Action. including the condition stated in the Council Action upon which the receipt of grant funds is conditioned: (2) this Ag reement; (3) the project summary. and (4) the grant application. Consistent -,�lith the grant condition stated in the Council Action and in consideration of the Council's award of the grant funds made available under this Agreement. the Grantee agrees. (1) that its receipt of grant funds for construction of a roundabout (5600,000) and the construction,/rehabilitation of Frost Avenue, including parking bays, curb removal, sidewalk/trail connections (S600.000), is conditioned on Frost Avenue (currently a county road) being cz� redesignated a iviaplewood street: and (2) if the Grantee has received all or some portion of the S1.200,000 amount for these components of the project and if Frost Avenue has not been redesignated a lklaplewood street by the End Date stated at Page I of this Agreement, the Grantee will immediately repay to the Council the $1,200,000 amount, or such lesser portion of the 51,200,000 amount, it recei� for these components of the project and (3) if the Grantee has not received any of the 51.200.000 amount for these components of the project and Frost Avenue has not been redesignated a IvIaplewood street by the End Date stated at Page I of this Agreement. the Grantee shall not be eligible to receive anv of the 51.200,000 - 0 1 amount for these components of the pr and shall be eligible to recei\ e only S600,000 of the Grant Amount stated at Page I of this Agreement. C7 - Pcl-eS o(8 Pqzcs Applicant: Maplewood Recommended Funding Amount: $1,800,000 Project Name: Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment ---------- Project Description in Application: The first phase of the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan includes the redevelopment of the St. Paul Tourist Cabin site located on the west side of the redevelopment area (940 Frost Avenue). The St. Paul Tourist Cabin site is 6.5 acres in size, was established in approximately 1955, and is the oldest manufactured home site in Maplewood. Manufactured homes in this site date back to the 1950s and 1960s and do not meet current building code standards. In addition to the manufactured homes, there are 20 seasonal "tourist" cabins on the site. In order to accommodate the first phase of redevelopment, the city must implement street and sidewalk/trail improvements, storm drainage improvements, and park improvements in the western portion of the redevelopment area. The street and sidewalk/trail improvements include the reconstruction/rehabilitation of Frost Avenue between Highway 61 and Phalen Place, including improvements at the Highway 61 and Frost Avenue intersection, and the construction of a roundabout at the Frost Avenue and East Shore Drive intersection. The storm drainage improvements include the construction of a stormwater pond and mechanical treatment system to treat stormwater before it is discharged into Lake Phalen. Advisory Committee Comments on Demonstration, Innovation, Catalyst Elements of this Project: The stormwater management component of this project is a model that goes well beyond the required standards. The sidewalks and roundabout will result in a more walkable corridor, which will serve as a catalyst for future development. Funding Requested/Funding Recommended: 00 necommenciew $600,000 $600,000 Construction of a roundabout $600,000 $600,000 Reconstruction/rehabilitation of Frost Avenue (parking bays, curb removal. sidewalk/trail connections) $600,000 $600,000 1 Construction of stormwater treatment and $300,000 im provements at intersection of Frost Avenue and Hwy. 61 Receipt of grant award for the first two items listed is conditioned on Frost Avenue, a county roan, being redesignated a Maplewood street. Previnne. T.CDA Grants Received For This Or Related Protect: Dp.velonment Timeline: -T 4'& Z a t -1-1, , us�, St 2003 $8,000 Opportunity Grant — development of the Completed November 2007 Construction of stormwater treatment and Gladstone Neighborhood Master Plan November 2007 Dp.velonment Timeline: -T 4'& S Af Construction of a roundabout Ar il 2007 November 2007 Reconstruction/rehabilitation of Frost Avenue April 2007 November 2007 Construction of stormwater treatment and A ril 2007 November 2007 Agenda Item L4 Applicant: City of Maplewood Location: Gladstone NeighborhOod — I[te[section of Frost Avenue and English Street and Lands SU[nOUDdiDg Existing Land Uses: Light Manufacturing /M-1\ BUSiD8SS CODlrOerCi@l (BC) Business Commercial Modified /BC-M\ Limited Business Commercial (LBC) Medium Multiple Dwelling Residential /R-3M\ Double Dwelling Residential /R-2\ Single Dwelling Residential (R-1) Proposed Land Uses: City Council Hearing Date: Gladstone Medium /G-M\ Gladstone High (G-H) Gladstone Mixed-Use (G M-U). February 26, 2007 Project Description: The City of Maplewood iS proposing tO amend its comprehensive land use plan and map. The proposed amendment iS for the Gladstone neighborhood located generally at the intersection of Frost Avenue and English Street, east of Trunk Highway 61 in the central portion of the city. The city council adopted 8 master plan for the Gladstone neighborhood inDecember 2000 (Gladstone Neighborhood Redevek}pmentP|an). The master plan iS intended bJ provide direction and guidance for the Gladstone neighborhood as it redevelops. The city intends to use the master plan as an appendix to the comprehensive plan as it relates tO the Gladstone neighborhood. Request: City staff is requesting that the city council adopt the proposed comprehensive land use plan and map amendment in the Gladstone neighborhood. This amendment would change the comprehensive land use designations in the area from light manufacturing /K8-1\, business CUnl[n8rCi8| /BC\, business CUnl[nSrCi8| modified (BC-K8). limited buSiDSSS C0nl[nSrCi8| /LIBC\, n08diuQD multiple dwelling residential /R-3K4\ double dwelling residential (R'2) and single dwelling residential (Fl-1) to the land use designations 83 described in the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan. This includes land use designations proposed tobecalled Gladstone Medium (G-K8). Gladstone High (G-H), and Gladstone Mixed-Use (GK8-U). Recommendations: C)n February 8.20O7. the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed comprehensive land use and map amendment with four revisions to staff's recommended amendments as described in the staff report. Staff recommends approval of the amendment aS originally proposed. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: DATE: INTRODUCTION Project Description Greg Copeland, City Manager Gh8nn FinvvGU.A|CP. Planner Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Map AmmmmdmnemK - GUadstmne City OfMaplewood Gladstone Neighborhood (Intersection of Frost Ave. and English St.) February 21,2UO7 for the February 26 City Council Meeting The City of Maplewood is proposing LOGnnRnditsCOnnpreh8nSive|8ndUseo|8n8ndrn8p. The proposed amendment is for the Gladstone neighborhood located generally at the intersection of Frost Avenue and English Stnaet, east of Trunk Highway 61 in the central portion of the city (refer k} the Gladstone neighborhood aerial map attached S8pan8L8|y\. The city council adopted 8 master plan for the Gladstone neighborhood in[}RCRnnb8r2000 (Gladstone Neighborhood R9dev8|opnn9nLP|an). The master plan is intended toprovide direction and guidance for the Gladstone neighborhood gaitredevelops. The city intends touse the master plan 8s8n appendix iVthe comprehensive plan asitrelates tV the Gladstone neighborhood. Request City staff is requesting that the city council adopt the proposed comprehensive land use plan and map amendment in the Gladstone neighborhood. This amendment would change the comprehensive land use designations in the area from light manufacturing (M-1), business C0Ol[n8rCi8| /BC\, business C0Ol[nSrCi8| modified (BC-K4). |iQDiL8d buSiDSSS C0nl[nSrCi8| (LBC) nn9diUrn nnVUip|8 dwelling residential (Fi'3M), double dwelling residential (R-2). and single dwelling residential (R-1) to the land use designations as described in the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan. This includes land use designations proposed tobecalled Gladstone Medium /G-K4\, Gladstone High (G-H) and Gladstone Mixed-Use /GK4-U\. March 2004 the city council established a top priority to be the redevelopment of the Gladstone December 2004 the city council initiated a master planning process for the Gladstone neighborhood generally defined as the area G]0DA Frost Avenue b8bw88D Trunk Highway 61 and Hazelwood Street and the area along English Street between Ripley Avenue and the Gateway January 10.2O05. the city council appointed a2O-nlennb9r task force k} guide the planning process. The task force was made VpVfcity representatives (city council, planning COnnnni8sk]n. community design review board, housing and redevelopment authority, parks commission, and historical preservation commission), business ovvn9rG. residents, and members at large. August 8.2O05, the city council adopted 8 resolution directing the preparation of8nAlternative Urban Area wide Review \vvhiCh is an environmental review that evaluates cumulative impacts resulting from multiple redevelopment projects Spre8d over larger area. March 23 the Gladstone task force recommended approval 0f the draft November 2O05 Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan. This plan proposed approximately O00new housing units in the Gladstone redevelopment area. April 18, 2006, the city council held a public hearing on the draft Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan dated November 14.20O5. During the public hearing the city council heard recommendations from various commission and board representatives and task force members as well as heard comments from the public. June through December 2006 the city council held several workshops to review the draft Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan dated November 14.2O05. December 12, 2006, the city council adopted the final version of the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Master Plan. This plan proposes 05O new housing units and 5O.0OOLo 75.000 new neighborhood retail and office space in the Gladstone redevelopment area. December 13, 2006, the Metropolitan Council approved $8.8 million in Livable Communities grants tO ten projects iDS8v8DCitieS. The development/redevelopment projects 8||dRnlODSt[8tBd a component of land use that connect development with transit, intensify land uses, connect housing and 8nnp|oynn8nL, provide G mix ofhousing affordability, and provide infrastructure to connect communities and attract investment. The City of Maplewood was awarded the largest grant of the ten projects inC|uding$1.8nni||iOntofUndPh83e|pub|ioinnppOvennentsinthe Gladstone Redevelopment area (refer to Phase | public improvement map attached sepan8t8|y). February 6, 2007, the planning commission held a public hearing to review and make a recommendation on the proposed comprehensive land use plan and map amendment. The planning commission recommended approval of the proposed amendment with three changes as described below. DISCUSSION The adopted redevelopment o|onah0vvSaevena||ondUSeChonQeathot8renotournentlyogdof the comprehensive plan such 8s allowing for a mixture Vf land uses including multi-family residential and neighborhood retail and commercial. The redevelopment plan and proposed comprehensive plan amendment will direct future developments within the Gladstone neighborhood with the following guiding principles as defined in the master plan: design the future land uses as ovi||oge oonCept, transform naQiono| trails into celebrated village oon'idors, make Gladstone a compelling quality of life choice, weave natural systems and ecological functions into the built and recreational fabric, a||Ovv G|8dstVne'ShJtunB 03 whisper stories Of its past, make walkability the standard, think of Gladstone as a neighborhood for all stages of life, rn8k8 the Gladstone nn8sL9r plan 8 rnod8| for others to follow, and rn8k8 rnU|ti-rnod8| links between Gladstone and areas beyond. St. Paul Tourist Cabin Site DevelODment Bart Montanari of Dabar Companies, LLC, will be submitting a plan to the city to redevelop the 6.5-acre St. Paul Tourist Cabin site located @t940 Frost Avenue with senior housing (refer tO attached preliminary site plan and 8|9v8LionS\. The current proposal calls for 18O senior housing units including 20 memory care units, 60 assisted living units, and 100 independent units. Walker 2 Elder Care Services will market and manage the facility. Mr. K4onLan8h indicates that the development will create 65 new full-time jobs and will include 8 library, fitness rO0nn (available to residents and nonresidents of the development), bank, beauty salon, theater, chapel, and deli. There would be 98 underground parking stalls, 70 surface parking stalls, a transit shelter along Frost Avenue, and several gardens and walking trails throughout the site. The building will have three to four stories with each B|evod0n being constructed of quality building [nGt8h8|S. Mr. Montanari has hired Link Wilson of Kaas Wilson Architects to design the building. Mr. Wilson was the architect for the Summerhill Senior Cooperative building, which has been constructed on the Transfiguration Elementary School site, north of the Maplewood Nature Center. Staff has reviewed the preliminary plans for the project 8ndfindSth8tthRyrne8tLh9gViding principles and density allowances [f the adopted Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan. The property is currently zoned and guided as medium multiple dwelling residential (R-3M). The existing zoning On the property allows for multiple dwelling VnitS, including the senior housing development proposed bv Mr. MVni8nari. However, the city council must approve anamendment to the city's comprehensive land use plan in order to allow the number of units being proposed on the site (18O senior housing Un|LS). Mr. K4oni8n8ri proposes LV submit all required land use applications to the city for this development in March or April, with plans to break ground for the project in September 2007. Comprehensive Plan The Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan proposes densities for future land use patterns supporting approximately 450 to 650 new housing units, with the maximum number being achieved through density bonuses or incentives for development projects thotincorponate principles aS described in the master plan. The master plan includes a concept map [ffuture |8Dd uses OO figure 4-1 (figure 4-1 attached and also found in the master plan previously distributed). The redevelopment land use concept map was used GS8 model for the comprehensive land use map changes proposed. The Gladstone neighborhood is currently guided with seven different land use designations in the city's comprehensive land use plan including light manufacturing (K0-1) bU8iD8Ss coOl[O8[Ci8| (BC) buSiDSSS C0nl[nBrCi8| modified /BC-M\, limited business C0D101BFCi8| /LBC\. medium nnVUip|8 dwelling residential (R'3K8), double dwelling residential /R-2\. and single dwelling residential (R-1). The master plan reflects several land use changes that are currently not permitted under these land use designations such as allowing for a mixture of land uses including nnu|U-f8nni|y residential and neighborhood retail and COnnnnerCi8|. |n order ho ensure the comprehensive land use plan will allow for future developments 8S proposed in the master plan, the city's comprehensive plan (dated May 2002) must include the master plan oa8namendment. The master plan will serve 8ao separate document k}the comprehensive plan gSit relates b} the Gladstone neighborhood. |n addition, city staff iS proposing to amend the comprehensive land use map in the area with three new land use designations called Gladstone Medium (G-K8), Gladstone High /G-H\. and Gladstone Mixed-Use (GyW-U). The proposed land use designations will reflect the allowable densities in the Gladstone neighborhood 8sfollows: G-M: 7 to 12 units per acre G-H: 12 to 38 units per acre GK8-U: 20tD30 units per acre (00 percent residential and 40 percent commercial uses) 3 State statute requires that 8 comprehensive plan amendment [f this degree follow 8review process to include a public hearing by the city's planning commission with final approval by the city council; notification of the proposed amendment to adjacent governmental units; and review and final action by the Metropolitan Council to ensure the amendment is in conformance with [8gi0O8| ayStS[n plans, consistency with the MRtnUpO|it@O Land Planning Act r8qUirR[nSDtS and Metropolitan Council policies, and is compatible with adjacent communities. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (planning consultants) prepared the Metropolitan Council's required comprehensive plan amendment submittal form /att8Ched\. This form was submitted to the adjacent governmental units and the Metropolitan Council after the planning commission's public hearing. The proposed comprehensive plan land use and map amendment is described in detail On the submittal form. Overall changes in the land use and density ranges can be found on page 8, item 10. In addition, the existing and proposed land use designations rn8p is found On figures 3 and 5. Both of these changes reflect the land uses and densities oS described inthe approved master plan. City council approval of this proposed amendment would be subject to the Metropolitan Council's final approval. 8L8tR statute allows the Metropolitan Council 00 days Lo review and take final action on comprehensive plan amendments. City staff will help facilitate and accelerate the process by following up with the adjacent communities and with the Metropolitan Council. When the city adopts new land use designations such as these, it is usually proposed at the same time @SG new zoning district. The 0i||C[8St neighborhood iS such on example when the city council adopted the Mixed Use zoning district in2004 and peQVid8d land within the Hi||cpesL neighborhood hn the Mixed Use land use designation 8t the same time. |f time permitted, city staff would do the same with the Gladstone neighborhood. But due tO time constraints 0fthe comprehensive plan amendment review process, St. Paul Tourist Cabin redevelopment proposal, and completion of a new zoning district, the city must review and adopt the proposed Gladstone comprehensive plan amendment before staff has time LO complete the writing Of the new zoning district. /\s with the comprehensive land use designations inthe area, the Gladstone neighborhood is aDnRU with several different zoning districts. These zoning districts are limited iD their ability tO influence and shape development towards the desired pattern and form expressed through the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan. As such, 8 new zoning district is proposed which will enable the city to more clearly articulate and ultimately achieve the desired pattern and character Vf uses within the area. City staff and the Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. are creating a form-based zoning approach and framework that will regulate development within the Gladstone neighborhood. Form-based codes address the relationship between building facades and the public realm, the form and mass of buildings in relation to one another, and the scale and types of streets and blocks. |t places the primary emphasis on building type, dimensions, parking location, and tSg8d8 features, and less emphasis OOuses. |t will stress the appearance 0f the StpR8tSC8pe.0r public realm, over long lists 0f permitted uses. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. has prepared an overview of the form- based zoning approach for the city council's review /Gtt8Ched\. The proposed zoning code will include four district descriptions including Open Space (open opooaandpark|and — tomUovvanbvnand passive recreational uses, natural resource p[SSSrvGtiOD and education, hiStOhC8| interpretation, and public gathering); Neighborhood 1 (lower density — redevelopment areas that are adjacent to existing single family residential 4 disthCts\; Neighborhood 2 (more moderate density — residential redevelopment toward the interior of the neighborhood; and Neighborhood 3(rnixofreSidentia|8ndConnDlenci8|—redeve|OpDleDtiD ot the core of the neiQhb0rh0od). (Refer to attached Neighborhood District nn8p.\ These separate districts will ensure appropriate buffering and transitions from proposed redevelopment sites and adjacent single family h0n08S. The proposed zoning code will also include 8 section on sustainable design gUid8|ines8ndbonVS density standards. This section is intended to offer incentives for development projects to incorporate the sustainable and 8c0-fhend|y design principles described in the master plan. If each redevelopment site utilized all allowable bonuses, the overall new housing in the area would feasibly increase bv the maximum of850units. City staff proposes to present the draft form-based zoning district (Gladstone Mixed Use) to the planning ConnnniSaion and community design review board by the beginning of March. After recommendations by the planning commission and community design review board, final review and adoption ofthe code by the city council iS currently scheduled for March nrApril. Plannina Commission Public Hearina On February 6, 2007, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed comprehensive land use and map changes with four revisions as follows: Planning Commission Proposed Change: The three vacant parcels located south 0f Gloster Park and north Of Ripley Avenue should n8nn8in single t8nni|y residential (refer to PC Change 1 Map attached). The purpose for this change was ho ensure consistent single family development next to the existing single family residential properties. City Staff Comments: These three properties are vacant. Two of the properties are owned by an adjacent home owner on Ripley Avenue, and the other is owned by an adjacent home owner 0n Frank Street. During various iterations CJredevelopment concept plans over the last few years, these three parcels were included in several n}d8v8|Opnnent scenarios. The composite concept plan Vn page 1-7[d the master plan (attached) shows the properties included aS the result nf information gathered through various public meetings and background research. However, the final master plan image on page 4-0(8tt8Ched) does not include these properties. With the reguiding of these properties to the new Gladstone Medium land use designation, these properties could be developed with attached or detached town homes on a short Cu|-dS-S8C road into the properties from Ripley Avenue. The town homes would have tO meet the guiding principles of the master plan and proposed zoning district which would require buffering Of the units from the adjacent residential properties to the east, south, and west. 2. Planning Commission Proposed Change: The six parcels located north of Summer Avenue, east of the Vento Trail, and west of Clarence Street should be changed from Gladstone High Density to Gladstone Medium Density (refer to PC Change 2 Map attached). The purpose for this change was k} create G better transition between the existing single family residential properties located across Clarence Street. City Staff Comments: These three properties contain single family homes. These properties were also included in various iterations of redevelopment concept plans and are displayed in the final master plan image on page 4'8(Gtt8ched) with redevelopment Cf the properties with higher density attached housing products in a lower 3-story or 2-story 9 configuration. The condominium ntvR homes would meet the guiding principles ofthe master plan and the proposed zoning district which would require buffering of the units from the existing residential properties across Clarence Street. 3. Planning COD)[niSSiOD Proposed Change: Create two Gladstone High Density land use designations 8Sfollows: Gladstone High /1\-12tO2Ounits per acre and Gladstone High (2) -200o3O units per acre. The planning commission felt that the density ranges of12 to30 units per acre were too high (with o variation of8 units per aCn8\. The Gladstone High (1) could be used to reguide the six parcels located north of Summer Avenue, east of the Vento Trail, and west of Clarence Street aG defined above. City Staff Comments: The Gladstone zoning district 8s defined above will separate districts to ensure appropriate buffering and transitions from proposed redevelopment sites and adjacent single family homes. |n addition, any reduction in the density applied in the comprehensive land use plan and map amendment would reduce the overall density of the entire Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan. AG such, decreased densities in one area should be compensated for with increased densities in another area in order io achieve the maximum number Vf new housing units Of050. 4. Planning Commission Proposed Change: The Gladstone land use designations 3hoU|d be renamed t0a more generic name so that these designations COu|dUeVSedinOLher areas of the city. City Staff Comments: One 0f the gUilding principles 0f the Gladstone master plan is03 create 8 model for others tofollow. This will be the case with the master plan and the proposed zoning district. However, the comprehensive land use designations and density requirements proposed for the Gladstone neighborhood are very specific to unique pieces 0f property within the neighborhood. The purpose of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan is to help the public and private sector in planning for future physical, social and economic development within the city, while considering surrounding cities and the region. The city's adoption Of the Gladstone master plan @8@D amendment to the comprehensive plan, along with changing the comprehensive land use map to reflect the proposed Gladstone land use designations within the Gladstone area, is consistent with city goals and po|ioiea, regional p0|ioie3, and will help manage projected population growth in the metropolitan area by fostering more residential and employment opportunities. Adopt the comprehensive land use plan and map amendment resolution attached. This resolution changes the land use designations in the Gladstone neighborhood fnJrn|ight manufacturing (K8-1). business commercial /BC\. business commercial modified /BC-PW\.limited business cOrnnn8rcia| (LBC), rnediVnn multiple dwelling residential (Fl-3K4), d0Ub|R dwelling residential (Fl-2). and single dwelling residential /Fl-1\to the land use designations 8Gdescribed in the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan dated December 2006. This includes land use designations which will b8 called Gladstone Medium (G-yW). Gladstone High /G-H\.and Gladstone Mixed-Use /GW4-U\. The comprehensive land use plan amendment is based Vneight specific comprehensive plan land use and housing goals and four land use policies as follows: R 1. Provide for orderly development. 3. Protect and strengthen neighborhoods. J. Promote economic development that will expand the property tax base, increase jobs and provide desirable services. 4. Minimize the land planned for streets. 5. Minimize conflicts between land uses. 0. Provide 8 wide variety of housing types. 7. Provide safe and attractive neighborhoods and commercial 8n]8S. R. Plan multi-family housing with an average density of at least 10 units per acre. Polices: 1. Include a variety Vf housing types for all types Vfresidents. 2. Disperse moderate-income developments throughout the city near bus lines. J. Support innovative subdivision and housing design. 4. Protect neighborhoods from activities that produce excessive noise, dirt, odors or which generate heavy traffic. P:\com-dev\gladstone\comp plan and zoning\2-6-07 com plan public hearing memo 1. Gladstone Neighborhood Aerial Map z. Phase | Public Improvement Map 3. St. Paul Tourist Cabin Site Preliminary Redevelopment Site Plans and Elevations 4. Figure 4-1 found in Master Plan - Future Land Uses o. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment Submittal Form u. Form-Based Zoning Memorandum 7. Gladstone Zoning Neighborhood District Map 8. PC Change 1 map 9. Composite Concept Plan found in Master Plan 10 Final Master Plan Image found in Master Plan 11 Pu Change 2 Map 12 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Map Amendment Resolution 0 Attachment 1 1 Attachment 2 --------------- -- - ------- ---------- - - ----------- > -7 - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - iF �,�I �,� I�� ` . I , I I C x — — — — — — — — — — --- 1 71 TT ---------- II v A.�, NJ 5 T lo L M /R i2 L --- --------- EMO ----------- Attachment 3 i i A U CU O CU a--+ M LJ y vJ C: a--+ v U Q CD 0 v -F-+ O -0 C/) O O a --+ v v CD v �' J (f) 0 0 .� a O a N a --+ tff E ��RR V E U) O a --+ v v CD v �' J (f) 0 .� O • ► M, i • r i • i i 1 U 6 ' V J' r � V A-+ O F 1 • • 1 i s w J tU N 0 CU a --+ V CU U) 0 o cD U Q LL -� a o > a to G1 s i i U O a --+ m LJ • • 6 j 5) 7 � � v �- E ° o _ o LL > 1 I- 0 k I O cu 7 W c� Q) t0 a) Y O LL i i ra LJ 0 m AM CU . O F 1 i. 1 i I 0 V o 2 Z Attachment 4 i to Q) .4- Q) o -E -0 0 4- 0 Q 4- 42 �s 771 QL 7s O Q) Cl (o � 0 CL M M .S2 Q) 0 Z3 is Q M Cj Z O Q) CL ct Cz Q3 O. bo cn -5 U) Q) Co ZZ M M i Attachment it Metropolitan Council Local Planning Handbook I Amendment Form Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form Gladstone Neighborhood AMENDMENT NAME This form is available in MS Word format on the Metropolitan Council's website: 1. Provide the fd|OvVnQ information: Local governmental unit City Of Maplewood Contact name Contact title ShaUn FiDVY8U.AICP Planner Address C ity of Maplewood: 1830 County Road B East C ity, Tele FAX number (S51)249-2318 Email add Date of 2. Identify type of amendment and describe. Check all that apply: X 2a. Land use change 2b. MUSA Expansion or Change X 2c. Text Change X 2d. Other Update to the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to the Gladstone Neighborhood. 3. Provide a description nf the amendment. General location Gladstone Neighborhood — City nf Maplewood — Ramsey County The Gladstone Neighborhood is located east of Trunk Highway 61 in the central portion of Maplewood. The project area im connected to two regional trails, the Munger State 7 and the BnJCeVentO 7 Approximately quarter mile south of the Gladstone Neighborhood is the City of St. Paul (See Figure 1). Brief description The City Vf Maplewood has recently adopted @redevelopment plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood titled the "Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment P|Gn^. dated December Of30O6 (See Figure 2). The plan iS intended tOprovide direction for the Gladstone Neighborhood @sitrHd8v8|OpS. An Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was also completed for the project area titled the "Gladstone Area Redevelopment Master Plan AUAR", dated September nmof28O5. |[in anticipated the Final AUAR will bn adopted bv t he City Council i March of 2OO7 February 2006 1 In addition, the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan needs to be amended to the City's Comprehensive Plan dated May of 2002. The redevelopment plan will serve as a separate document to the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to the Gladstone Neighborhood. The redevelopment plan reflects several land use changes that are not currently part of the comprehensive plan (See Figure 3, 4 & 5). Affected area, in acres 195.30 Acres February 2006 2 SECTION 1: PROCESS OVERVIEW commission 4. Indicate official local status of the plan amendment. (Check all that apply.) The local governing body must take action on the proposed amendment before submittal to the Metropolitan Council. Action Acted • 11 =41MEEM4 "I Date of Action val Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review Pending Approval 5. List adjacent local governments, school districts and other jurisdictions and the date the copies were sent. Notifying adjacent governmental units and affected school districts is one of the criteria the Council will use in determining whether an application is deemed complete for review. City of Landfall: Helen Hallis, City Clerk — 11 Forest Heights, Landfall, MN 55128 — Sent on City of Little Canada: Joel Hanson, City Administrator — 515 Little Canada Rd E., Little Canada, MN 55117 — Sent on City of Newport — Larry Bodahl, City Administrator - 596 7th Ave, Newport, MN 55055 — Sent on City of North St. Paul — David Kotlinek, Community Services Manager — 2400 Margaret St., N. St. Paul, MN 55109 — Sent on City of Oakdale: Brent Brommer, Community Development Director - 1584 Hadley Ave. N., Oakdale, MN, 55128 — Sent on City of St. Paul: 1400 City Hall Annex, 25 West 4th St., Saint Paul, MN 55102 — Sent on City of Vadnais Heights: Donn Whiski, Community Development Director - 800 E County Rd E, Vadnais Heights, MN 55127 — Sent on City of White Bear Lake: Jim Robinson, Community Development Director - 4701 Highway 61 N., White Bear Lake, MN 55110 — Sent M City of Woodbury: Dwight Picha, Community Development Director - 8301 Valley Creek Rd., Woodbury, MN 55125 — Sent on Ramsey County: Dave Twa, County Manager — 15 W. Kellogg Blvd., Room 250, St. Paul, MN 55102 — Sent on Washington County: Donald J. Theisen, County Engineer — 14949 62 St. N., PO Box 6, Stillwater, MN 55082 — Sent on Mahtomedi School District: Dr. Mark Wolak, Superintendent — 1520 Mahtomedi Ave., Mahtomedi, MN 55115 — Sent on February 2006 3 Roseville School District: Bryan McDonough, Superintendent -1251VVCVunb/Rd.B2.RVSeviUe.K8N55113—SentOn South Washington School District: Tom Nelson, Superintendent —7362E. Point Douglas Rd. S, Cottage Grove, K4N55O16— Sent On St. Paul School District: Patty Phillips, Superintendent -2520 East 12 th /\ve, North St. Paul, K8N551OO— Sent Vn White Bear Lake School District: Dr. Theodore S.B|@e8inA. Superintendent -4M55 Bloom AvG.. White Bear Lake, K8N5511O— Sent On 6. Identify outstanding issues or conditions made iOthe Metropolitan Council's review of the municipality's 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update or subsequent comprehensive plan amendment? o, the Council's review did not identify any issues or conditions. Issue/Condition Steps taken or future planned actions, including date The QtynfMaplewood needed to have on The City updated its Comprehensive Sewer Plan in 2003. The plan adopted comprehensive sewer plan approved update addressed the inconsistencies with the City's previous 2U0O by the Met Council before the City could alter, update and considered future devn|opment/redave|oprnnnL The Plan expand or improve its sewage disposal was also prepared bn meet the Tier | and Tier || content requirements system. identified in the Local P|onninOHandbnok. 7. Will/has @n environmental review (Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Environmental Impact Statement or Alternative Urban Ape@vvide Review) be/been completed for the Site? none required. Yes, indicate type of review and approximate date of completion. Include @ summary of findings, if completed: An Alternative Urban AnaavvdnReview was completed for the project mreat0edUle "Gladstone Area Redevelopment Master Plan AUAR^ A copy of the AUARieavailable upon request. AD executive summary Vf the AUAR can be found iD Appendix A.Adraft copy dated September 6 th , 2005 was submitted for public comment in September of 2005. The final document including the response tO comments and @ final mitigation plan iS anticipated tVbS adopted by the City Council iO March Of2OO7. February 2006 4 SECTION 2: FORECASTS 8. Does the plan amendment change the population, household and employment forecasts that appear iD the Metropolitan Council's published forecast tables? (Published forecast tables are OD|iDH.) No: OO change iD community-level forecasts Yes: identify the net changes tO community-level forecasts due tO the plan amendment: The proposed land use changes may influence community-level forecasts. ASthe Gladstone Neighborhood redevelops, individual projects will need k]be reviewed based OD their influence tV community-level forecasts. An increase in population and household forecasts is assumed for this project based on the land use categories and typologies listed in the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Master Plan. Based on the densities and land use patterns within the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan, the potential exists for approximately 450 to 650 new housing units to be constructed. The phasing for the CVO9tnJCtipD of these units will be based on market conditions. For this plan update, it assumed that 1/3Vfthe estimated R5O units will occur by2O10 with the remainder occurring by2O2U. For commercial development, the plan assumes no net increase in employment. It in mnnunled that the existing number 0f jobs and employment will be retained through any redevelopment Or through the replacement Vfexisting jobs with new commercial/retail jobs. The plan assumes 50 feet of new commercial development. For all amendments that propose land use x»r forecast changes, you must complete the questions #10 (land use), #11 (housing), #12 (trip generation), #20 (sewer flow) and #30 (water supply). SECTION 3: LAND USE S. Does the plan amendment propose any impacts to wetlands located on the site? No wetlands on the site. No impacts towetlands located on the site. There are several wetlands that fall within the project area. However development aa proposed, will not impact any of the wetlands. Any wetland impacts as a result of unanticipated development will need to take into account the appropriate mitigation strategies. Any wetland impacts will require @ mitigation plan to obtaining all appropriate permits outlined in Section 8 of the Gladstone AU/\R. Yes, describe the type of wetland, potential impacts and mitigation plans: February 2006 5 Net Changes (Additions or to Community-level reductions due to the Forecasts amendment) 2010 2020 2030 Households 217 433 0 Population 539 1,074 0 For all amendments that propose land use x»r forecast changes, you must complete the questions #10 (land use), #11 (housing), #12 (trip generation), #20 (sewer flow) and #30 (water supply). SECTION 3: LAND USE S. Does the plan amendment propose any impacts to wetlands located on the site? No wetlands on the site. No impacts towetlands located on the site. There are several wetlands that fall within the project area. However development aa proposed, will not impact any of the wetlands. Any wetland impacts as a result of unanticipated development will need to take into account the appropriate mitigation strategies. Any wetland impacts will require @ mitigation plan to obtaining all appropriate permits outlined in Section 8 of the Gladstone AU/\R. Yes, describe the type of wetland, potential impacts and mitigation plans: February 2006 5 10. Describe land use changes in acres, applicable to this amendment site, using the following tables and filling in the community's specific land use categories: F-1 Not Applicable. CPA = Comprehensive Plan Amendment * 60 % of the mixed use development will consist of residential and the remaining 40% will consist of commercial uses. The above calculations reflect these assumptions. ** Based on the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan, the densities assumed for future land use patterns could support approximately 450 to 650 new housing units. The City of Maplewood will monitor redevelopment to stay within this range, which is well under the range evaluated in the AUAR. 11. If the proposed amendment changes the amount of land city wide staged for development by 2011 for medium density, high density or mixed use residential development, complete the following table to identify the amount of land available pre and post amendment: The proposed changes are a result of assumed development and will not have any impact on land that is considered developable. Fill in all land use categories that allow for multifamily residential development All Land Uses Residential Land Uses Only Land Use Designation (fill in Acres Developable acres # Units Based on Density Range) specific land use categories) Pre CPA Post CPA Pre CPA Post CPA Single Dwelling Residential 2.70 (Density Range: 2 - 5 Units Per 55.12 48.87 182 Units 180 Units Acre) I Mixed Use Double Dwelling Residential (Density Range: 3 - 7 Units Per 3.91 2.70 11 - 27 Units 8 - 18 Units Acre) Medium Density Multi Dwelling (Density Range: 7 -12 Units Per 6.22 6.91 43 -74 Units 48 - 82 Units Acre) High Density Multiple Dwelling (Density Range: 12 - 30 Units Per 8.38 16.53 100 - 251 Units 198 - 495 Units Acre) Mixed Use (Density Range: 20 - 30 Units Per Acre) * 0.00 24.92 NIA 299 - 448 Units Total 73.63 99.93 336 - 578 Units 733 - 1,223 Units CPA = Comprehensive Plan Amendment * 60 % of the mixed use development will consist of residential and the remaining 40% will consist of commercial uses. The above calculations reflect these assumptions. ** Based on the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan, the densities assumed for future land use patterns could support approximately 450 to 650 new housing units. The City of Maplewood will monitor redevelopment to stay within this range, which is well under the range evaluated in the AUAR. 11. If the proposed amendment changes the amount of land city wide staged for development by 2011 for medium density, high density or mixed use residential development, complete the following table to identify the amount of land available pre and post amendment: The proposed changes are a result of assumed development and will not have any impact on land that is considered developable. Fill in all land use categories that allow for multifamily residential development Acres city-wide for each land use category Pre-amendment Acres city-wide for each land use category Post-amendment Total Acres Developed acres Developable Acres* Amendment acres** Developable acres a b a-b=c d c+d=e Double Dwelling Residential 2.70 Medium Density Multi Dwelling Does Not Apply 6.91 Does Not Apply High Density Multiple Dwelling 16.53 I Mixed Use 2 "Developable" means land planned for urban residential development, infill or redevelopment before 2011. Amendment acres from the municipality's response to Question #10 above. • The numbers provided represent the net change in land use for the project area. February 2006 6 SECTION 4: TRANSPORTATION I 0=4 MEIM10 no 12. Complete the following table using the Institute pf Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 6 th Edition, to show whether this plan amendment increases or decreases trip generation from the planned land use and transportation element of the community's comprehensive plan. ° The AQTnumbers reflect what was provided for the redevelopment scenarios in the AUAR under Section 21, Traffic. Total times for post amendment are due to8change in land use from commercial to residential. 13. Will these changes require improvements to the existing local and regional road network or interchanges beyond what is in the community's current transportation plan? existing local and regional road networks can accommodate increase. Yes, describe improvements and who will pay for them: The AUAR recommends the following intersection improvements at TH 61/Parkway Drive/Frost Avenue: • Extend the T.B.6lsouthbound left turn lane toaminimum ofl50feet. • Change the northbound and southbound T.f{.6l left bmphasing tu permissive/protected phasing. • Install dual nustboondleft-bzoz lanes onto northbound T.fl. 61. A summary of the phase one infrastructure improvements can be found in Appendix B. Any infrastructure improvements will need b]be in-place Or in-conjunction VVdh[ed8V8|OpmKeO[. The City iS currently coordinating improvements with the County and State. Access 14. If the site has direct access to a principal or "A" minor arterial, is location and spacing consistent with applicable County guidelines orK8nDOT'o Access Management Guidelines )? Not applicable, no direct access to a principal or "A" minor arterial. em Yes, describe: THM1 im classified aeathe principal arterial. The project oremiaoen[eredaroundtheintensenhomof English Street and Frost Avenue (C8/\H28). which serve @S major cVUeCtQrS. Direct access tOTH61 can ba reached bv Frost Avenue. Spacing im consistent with County and K8n8]OlF Access Management Guidelines. Any improvements recommended in section 13 will be coordinated with the County and Mn/DOT to meet access management guidelines and other roadway specifications. February 2006 7 Trip Generation for the Site Based Trip Generation for the Site Based on Planned Land Use on Planned Land Use Pre-Amendment Post-Amendment Est. average daily traffic 8,736 ADT * 7,564 ADT * ° The AQTnumbers reflect what was provided for the redevelopment scenarios in the AUAR under Section 21, Traffic. Total times for post amendment are due to8change in land use from commercial to residential. 13. Will these changes require improvements to the existing local and regional road network or interchanges beyond what is in the community's current transportation plan? existing local and regional road networks can accommodate increase. Yes, describe improvements and who will pay for them: The AUAR recommends the following intersection improvements at TH 61/Parkway Drive/Frost Avenue: • Extend the T.B.6lsouthbound left turn lane toaminimum ofl50feet. • Change the northbound and southbound T.f{.6l left bmphasing tu permissive/protected phasing. • Install dual nustboondleft-bzoz lanes onto northbound T.fl. 61. A summary of the phase one infrastructure improvements can be found in Appendix B. Any infrastructure improvements will need b]be in-place Or in-conjunction VVdh[ed8V8|OpmKeO[. The City iS currently coordinating improvements with the County and State. Access 14. If the site has direct access to a principal or "A" minor arterial, is location and spacing consistent with applicable County guidelines orK8nDOT'o Access Management Guidelines )? Not applicable, no direct access to a principal or "A" minor arterial. em Yes, describe: THM1 im classified aeathe principal arterial. The project oremiaoen[eredaroundtheintensenhomof English Street and Frost Avenue (C8/\H28). which serve @S major cVUeCtQrS. Direct access tOTH61 can ba reached bv Frost Avenue. Spacing im consistent with County and K8n8]OlF Access Management Guidelines. Any improvements recommended in section 13 will be coordinated with the County and Mn/DOT to meet access management guidelines and other roadway specifications. February 2006 7 Transit and Other Modes of Transportation 15. Will this amendment enhance access to transit services, increase or decrease the demand for transit services or warrant the extension of new transit service? not currently served by transit or will not affect transit. Yes, list existing routes, describe changes and identify transit facility improvements (e.g. shelters, park and rides): The project area is served by Metro Transit Route #147. ThGVento Trail isalso part of the regional transit way SvStSD1. NO immediate i[Dp[VveOOeDt8 are D|@DDSd of transit nature; hOvv8v8r, with the increase in demand for transit services, growing traffic congestion, rising gas prices, and success of other regional transit investments, the Vento Trail could see transit improvements planned for the corridor accelerated within the next 5t0 10 years. The project will PeSU|tiD an increased population/household base which will have 8 modest impact ODridership. 16. Does the plan amendment include Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies or land use and urban design measures, if applicable? Yes, describe (e.g. car and van pooling, flexible work hours, mixed land uses that discourage vehicle trips and promote walking, biking, hdeSh8hOg. and transit): Residents will be able to utilize the GL P8U| Transportation Management Organization (TK8O) services. The TMO serves as a resource to help promote, educate and provide alternative modes of transportation. Development in a mixed use pattern seeks to decrease local trips and encourage more transit oriented development. 17. Does the plan amendment include pedestrian and bike access and facilities, including crosswalks, bridges, trails, sidewalks, and bike racks, if applicable? Yes, describe: The Gladstone Neighborhood Master Plan provides a list of "Guiding Principles" to follow as redevelopment occurs. Part Ofthee guiding principles are hJ embrace the neighborhoods dVse proximity to reQ|0n@| tx@i|G make pedestrian connectivity top priority and provide rnU|b-rnnda| links with the surrounding areas. The City in planning to implement street and sidewalk improvements along Frost Avenue GS part Ofthe first phase Ofredevelopment. February 2006 8 A ViBtion 18. Does the plan amendment affect any airport functions? X I Not applicable, site not within airport influence area or search area. No, site within airport influence area or search area but no impacts. Explain: es, describe relationship to airport safetv/noise zones, land use compatibilitv or other possible impacts: Wastewater 18. What type Of wastewater treatment will be utilized tO serve the proposed amendment? Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (I8TG). I I Privately Owned/Community Treatment System. I Local/Municipal Owned Wastewater Treatment Plant. X I Regional Wastewater Treatment. 20. Complete the following table, to show whether this plan amendment increases mdecreases wastewater flow from CUrneDdy planned |@Dd USG and sewer flow projections. Mgd = million gallons per day The community flow numbers are from the City's 2003 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Update (See Appendix C). The following assumptions were made to estimate the sewage flows: • The City's Zoning Map represents 20O3 development. • The City's Zoning Map with revisions tO include twelve (12) development/redevelopment areas that represents projected 2O1Odeve|opmenL • The City's Planned Land Use Map represents projected 2020 development. February 2006 9 life Also Age go Mgd = million gallons per day The community flow numbers are from the City's 2003 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Update (See Appendix C). The following assumptions were made to estimate the sewage flows: • The City's Zoning Map represents 20O3 development. • The City's Zoning Map with revisions tO include twelve (12) development/redevelopment areas that represents projected 2O1Odeve|opmenL • The City's Planned Land Use Map represents projected 2020 development. February 2006 9 21. Does the local wastewater system have adequate capacity, nr staged capacity to accommodate the proposed amendment? Yes, explain: The City of M@ '82003 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Update considered the Gladstone Neighborhood redevelopment and its impacts on sanitary sewer demand for the area. The sanitary sewer demand outlined in the Comprehensive Plan anticipated a greater developed area than what is outlined in the redevelopment plan. The existinq utilities have sufficient capacitv to serve Proiected future development. em 22. Does the regional wastewater system have adequate capacity, Vr staged capacity t0accommodate the proposed amendment? Yes, explain: As stated in Section 21, the Comprehensive Plan anticipated a greater developed area than what is outline in the redevelopment plan. Resulting in sufficient capacity to serve projected future development. ex 23. Has the community and/or Metropolitan Council identified an inflow and infiltration (W) problem? Yes, describe the steps taken to address the 1/1 issue and p|8DS for future action: In 2005 the Metropolitan Council notified the city that there was surge Vf inflow into three Of the meters within the city near the 3M campus, over 4 miles southeast Of this site. Meters indicated that this area does not have an|/|problem. Since that date the city has been working with the 3M and the Metropolitan Council t0mitigate the problem. The city has installed meters within the suspected property t0 track the flow and determine the source of the surge. The City and 3M have identified the likely source of the 1/1 problem and o mitigation project haobneninnp|ennented. The city also passed m sump pump program ordinance in 2005, which states that property owners cannot connect sump pumps to the sanitary sewer Since that d te the city has been inspecting || properties to ensure compli Ul8Ci does not have 8n identified |/|problem. 24. Identify i )th@twiUbeiOOp8CtHdbvUlH8HCh8OgHS@OdiDdiC@te if flows will bHdiverted from one interceptor service area to another? Two interceptors are located within the project area (7122 & 1-SP-217: Met Council G|S Data). Both serve as gravity mains and will not experience any diversion of flows based on redevelopment. 25. Does the plan amendment include any wastewater flow b]@n adjacent community? For new intercommunity agreements, the receiving community must also amend the sewer element of its Yes, enclose a copy of the inter-community agreement February 2006 10 Surface Water 26. Will stormwaterrunoff generated from proposed amendment be treated on-site? o, check one of the following and describe: Runoff will receive DOtreatment: Runoff will be treated off-site off-site treatment facility: Yes, describe type and level of on-site p0UUt8Dt removal treatment/mitigation D1@nS: The Gladstone Redevelopment Master Plan incorporates design policies and principles that seek to reduce runoff and provide increase opportunities for pre-treatment nf surface runoff resulting inlessoning the impacts nf the surface water runoff. |n addition tn regional system improvements, the redevelopment master p|8D and Cib/ policy will require developers to provide added treatment systems OD-Site. 27. Does the community have an updated stormwater management plan, including best management practices and implementation strategies? Yes, Year adopted: The City adopted @StormwaterManagement Plan which includes best 2002 management practices and implementation strategies. |n2OO4 the City also updated the plan through the implementation Of@D environmental utility fund. The environmental utility fund predominantly funds the implementation of storm water management throughout the city. 28. Does the community have an adopted erosion control ordinances? em Yes, Year adopted: Maplewood Ordinance Section 44-1243/y\ Water Supply 29. Does the community have an updated water supply plan? The {}hv has also incorporated, by policy, m standard forntormvvater management that incorporates substantial infiltration and treatment options that will meet the Non-degradation Plan requirements for Maplewood. These standards and policy have been adopted as part of the Gladstone Master Plan Document and resolutions of the City Council 01111120 The CdY S vv8tHr Sui)i)lY is mVvdGd bY St. Paul RHaiVn@| Water Services. 30. Will the proposed plan amendment increase m decrease projected water use from the community's current water supply plan? X I NO inCrS@SG or decrease in on]iectSd water use from water Su Yes, orovide water sui)r)lv Nan amendment to describe n facilities improvements or February 2006 11 SECTION 6: PARKS 31. Does the amendment include, or is it adjacent to or within 1 /2a mile of an existing or planned regional park, reserve nr trail, ma identified inthe 2030 Regional Parks Plan X Yes, describe potential impacts and mitigation plans: The Gladstone neighborhood is within a 1 /2mile of the Lake Phalen and Keller Regional Park, and the Munger State Trail and the Bruce Vento Trail. The Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan embraces these amenities by establishing an interconnected network of open spaces, parks, trail corridors and green streets. 32. Does the community have a Parks & Open Space Plan including regional park elements? X Yes, Year adopted: City of Maplewood Parks, Open Space, and Trail System Plan SECTION 7: IMPLEMENTATION 33. Will the plan amendment require changes in zoning or subdivision ordinances, capital improvement pn0gn8D1 (C|P) V[ other official CVDtrO|S? X Yes, describe proposed changes and timeline: An implementation timeline can be found in Appendix D. 34. Does the community have O@[U[8| resources protection ordinances, including wetland, [F8e preservation, and steep slopes? X Yes, identify: Environmental Preservation and Protection of Trees and Woodlands Ordinance dated, September 5, 2006. Environmental Protection and Critical Area Ordinance, dated 1982 February 2006 12 cu 0) c 0 O O o m 0 a") :!-- N 3: -0 E c cu - 0 cc X C) N E N C < C:) 0 4-- C'4 X a) w cu CU CD c = 0 a) — M ( E > 0 CL (D CL 0- 0— O C ❑ > co a) 3: a) a) :tl_ cn ^ ) 75 E a) c a) 3: _0 m to E .— E aw) — �— cts c :3 a) 0 L- a) 0 C) 0 3: C) (D (a a) a) �c -T cn -C -0 0)4- M C: 0 0 0 0- TN a) 0 - a) > ca a) 12 Cc$ - 0 a) a) > - -F; c Cc$ a) a) c . Ln a) a) c c6 E . (D O)o NZ , 0- Cc �� a) W E L a - ) c a 0 > o m o a) m C: cn - 0 — a) 7E 0 CY) - a) cn - 0 O E — a) a) M C%4 U O >1 0 0 0 (D - 0 0 m t CD C: CU a) in o 0)O fD - 0 C a) a) -c -a 0 CY) -0 N 0 a) o 0) a) CU 0 j 4 0 CL 0 E c: (D X a) E �Z o W C Cc *4-- < 0)- a) > a) 0 co -0 m CL C.) ui co R CL 0 Fn OL cn cn tD 2 0 (n ,4 QL 0 A. ca ca 0 C: (n a) 0 0 c E a) OL :E Q 0 a) a) -0 D•- Q a) E E 0 Q 4) 0 (n 0 D 4- 4 cn O .2 0 0 Q D D C1 00 c +: :3 0 CL i�ee�e�� W 4) c 0 a CL 0 06 CL 3F < . 0 z li 0 c 0 iii Lu M 0 1111 0 0 _iii �i� �i� � iii M . 11111111111 R CL 0 Fn OL cn cn tD 2 0 (n ,4 QL 0 A. ca ca 0 C: (n a) 0 0 c E a) OL :E Q 0 a) a) -0 D•- Q a) E E 0 Q 4) 0 (n 0 D 4- 4 cn O .2 0 a) CL a) M V4 tp O O U . 0 Q D D C1 00 c +: :3 0 CL W 4) c 0 a CL 0 06 CL 3F < . 0 z 0 c 0 Lu 0 0 0 c a) CL a) M V4 tp O O U . Figure 1. Project Location (Regional) Gladstone Neighborhood Figure 2. Project Location (Gladstone Neighborhood) Gladstone Neighborhood Figure 3. Planned Land Use Gladstone Neighborhood Figure 4. Redevelopment Plan Concept Gladstone Neighborhood Figure 5. Proposed Land Use Changes Gladstone Neighborhood Appendix A. Gladstone Area Redevelopment Master Plan Draft AUAR Executive Summary Gladstone Neighborhood Executive Summary N _ . .• An Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) is authorized under Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410. 3610 as an alternative form of environmental review for development projects. Generally, the AUAR consists of one or more development scenarios, an inventory of environmental and cultural resources, an assessment of the "cumulative" impacts that the development scenarios may have on these resources as well as public infrastructure services, and a set of mitigation measures that reduce or eliminate the potential impacts generated by the development. The AUAR is intended to address the "cumulative" impacts resulting from a sequence of related development projects as opposed to an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) which looks at a single project's impacts and does not attempt to outline mitigation initiatives. WHY AN AUAR FOR THIS PROJECT? An AUAR was chosen for the Gladstone Area Redevelopment Planning project because it will provide a better framework for coordinating multiple redevelopment projects that may occur over a period of years, identifying potential impacts, and focusing on effective, efficient mitigation strategies. I IN b'MMUM il I An AUAR is used as a tool to help parties interested in development within the project area understand the existing environmental and cultural resources present on a site prior to initiating detailed planning and design. It is also used to identify key initiatives or actions needed to minimize negative impacts generated by proposed development. Any proposed development in the project area would need to be reviewed for consistency with the AUAR and Mitigation Plan. If a development plan is not consistent with these documents or other statutory requirements, the developer may need to conduct additional environmental documentation/ review or request an amendment to the AUAR. Natural and cultural inventory information in the AUAR and the Mitigation Plan will be used to guide development. Design and construction would precede only after all other approvals and agreements are complete as required through the entitlement process. The AUAR by itself does not entitle a development project. The project would still need to conform with other plans and policies that guide the area including the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and in this case the Gladstone Redevelopment Master Plan. OVERVIEW OF THE AUAR PROCESS The City of Maplewood last adopted its Comprehensive Plan in May of 2002 consistent with Minnesota State statutory requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. The Comprehensive Plan designates a large portion of the project area as business commercial or light manufacturing. Today, the project area is home to a number of aging commercial sites that are being eyed by developers and property owners for future redevelopment. Part of the pressure for redevelopment is directly related to an inefficient and aging land use and development pattern. The location is not seen as a strong location for commercial development due to the relatively low traffic volumes on Frost Avenue and English Streets and the competing commercial corridors of TH 61, White Bear Avenue and Highway 36. The value of land as residential development is driving some of the pressure for redevelopment. The City and neighborhood undertook a lengthy planning process to arrive at a redevelopment plan for the Gladstone Area. The plan serves as a policy guide to staff and decision makers and helps generate a greater degree of certainty for the neighborhood. The process was facilitated through a task force representing the neighborhood residents and businesses, elected and appointed city officials and other special interest groups. The process also included five separate city wide public meetings which were attended by as many as 70 to 170 participants at any one time. The planning process resulted in the Gladstone Redevelopment Master Plan. The AUAR is a by- product of that planning process. DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS This AUAR document reviews two separate development scenarios (see Figures 6.1 and 6.2). The first scenario represents a "full buildout" scenario based on the land use plan contained within the current Comprehensive Plan. The second scenario is based on a redevelopment concept for the project area developed through the planning process. The evaluation attempts to understand the impacts from a development pattern that will create the greatest degree of impacts on the community or in terms customary to environmental reviews "the worst -case- scenario ". The Master Plan, and ultimately what may be built, will likely be a lesser intensity than what is assumed in the ALTAR. The current project area contains approximately 475 housing units (100 mobile homes /manufactured housing units, 188 single family detached homes, and 187 units in multi - family structures including duplexes to apartment /condo buildings). The project area is also home to approximately 180,000 square feet of commercial development of which only 30,000 to 40,000 square feet is purely neighborhood retail oriented uses (bakery, grocer, liquor, laundry mat, etc...). The remaining uses are services (construction offices, storage, auto repair services, etc...) or specialty commercial (entertainment, funeral home, etc... ). The project area also has nearly 60 acres of park and open space excluding the two regional trail corridors. The Comprehensive Plan Scenario: This scenario assumes a land use pattern reflective of what is currently present today with a few minor exceptions where parcels are either vacant or currently being used in a legal non - conforming manner. The scenario assumes a development pattern consistent with both the current comprehensive plan and zoning designations. The predominant pattern includes commercial uses north of Frost Avenue between the Vcnto Trail and Flicek Park and stretching along the cast side of English Street. Additional neighborhood commercial uses are reflected cast of English Street with frontage on Frost Avenue. Light Manufacturing is the land use pattern established for the area near Frank and Edward Street adjacent to Frost Avenue. A mix of residential uses surround the perimeter of the project area with the bulk being single family detached residential. Through limited redevelopment and development of existing vacant parcels, the project area could see an additional 100,000 square feet of non - residential development. The nature of this development will consist of low profile, destination oriented, service commercial or light industrial type uses similar to what is currently present today. Housing units would change only moderately with the redevelopment of the manufactured housing parcel on English Street. The Redevelopment Master Plan Scenario: The redevelopment master plan scenario assumes the conversion of existing logy intensity commercial services to a high density residential pattern with a limited amount of new commercial development estimated at roughly 50,000 square feet of new commercial development of a neighborhood retail character. An existing structure is proposed to remain with an additional 15,000 square feet of office /service for a total of approximately 65,000 square feet of commercial development as part of the redevelopment master plan scenario, At a full build out scenario, the redevelopment plan would add approximately 900 new housing units consisting of a combination of stacked condominium/ apartment units and attached townhomes. A portion of the open space area at Frost Avenue and English Street would be developed, accounting for a share of these housing units. The redevelopment master plan also calls for nearly S 18 million of public improvements. These include improvements to the open space area at Frost Avenue and English Street (the Savanna ), Flicek Park improvements, streetscape and roadway improvements primarily to Frost Avenue and English Street, storm water system enhancements, burial of overhead power lines along Frost Avenue and English Street and site contamination clean uplremediation. Implementation of redevelopment will require a combination of public and private actions and will occur over a period of years, possibly 10 or more years. IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS Park, Trail and Open Space System The Comprehensive Plan scenario preserves the current park and open space system as is today. The redevelopment scenario suggests a number of improvements and changes to the park and open space system. Gloster Park is proposed to be removed from the park supply and sold for development. The active recreational uses would be displaced. A tot lot would be relocated within the immediate area. Flicck Park is proposed to be reprogrammed to a combination of open space and storm water overflow areas, which would serve as an open space area except under extreme storm events. Active recreational uses in Flicek Park would be displaced from the immediate neighborhood but would still be available in nearby parks including Wakefield Park and Robinhood Park and the ballfield shared with the former Gladstone Elementary, The Gladstone Savanna neighborhood preserve would be reconfigured under the redevelopment plan, A portion of the Savanna is proposed to be redeveloped to housing that would orient towards the Savanna. A bridge structure under Frost Avenue would serve as a direct pedestrian, storm water and habitat connection to Flicek Park. Improvements to the Savanna and open space system include removing invasive species, re- establishing prairie understory, planting oak groves, planting buffers, and planting demonstration gardens at an interpretive plaza area near the Frost Avenue and English Street roundabout, In all, the reprogramming of Flicek Park and the reconfiguration of the Savanna open space results in a no -net loss of open space area. Also as part of the Flicek Park reorganization, a small play area, picnic area and parking area provide a limited level of active park use. The parking area also serves as a trail head location to the Gateway Trail. A key part of the Redevelopment Master Plan is the provision of an improved pedestrian circulation pattern that establishes safe pedestrian connections throughout the project area and connected to other regional amenities through the Gateway and Vento Trail and local connections. A combination of pedestrian or green streets, plaza streets, off street trails and sidewalks provide this network. No other changes to the park and open space system are proposed. Natural, Cultural and Physical Resources The Gladstone Area has a rich history that has been well documented. The area was one of the early settlement areas for the Maplewood Area. The two current Regional Trail Corridors were once thriving railroad corridors and the Savanna was an industrial railroad maintenance facility serving the railroad industry. Other major industries made this area their home in the early days. An historical and cultural resources study was completed as part of the planning process and is available from City Hall. The redevelopment plan offers the opportunity for this area to help tell the story through interpretation and public improvements. Redevelopment will be done with awareness of the historical and cultural resources present in the neighborhood and will avoid or minimize negative impacts to these resources. The natural resource system is a strong part of the project area and surrounding areas. Proximity to Lake Phalen is a significant benefit to the community. Under current conditions, storm water runoff gets to Lake Phalen quickly without significant treatment. The redevelopment scenario seeks to emphasize natural resource preservation and environmental design to provide greater opportunities to treat and control water runoff. The improvements planned for the Savanna and reconfiguration of Flicek Park will help with restoration of native ecological systems. The City has completed a Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the project area and has identified fourteen properties that will require additional environmental studies and /or cleanup activities. These activities may include Phase 11 ESAs, preparation and implementation of a development response action plan and determination of soil disposal costs. Utilities The Gladstone Area is currently developed, Existing sanitary sewer and watermain systems are in place to meet the demands of the existing neighborhood, and demands will not increase as a result of proposed redevelopment plan. The construction of additional watermain and sanitary sewer lateral extensions will be required in some areas to meet the needs of the proposed redevelopment. While the storm sewer is sized to meet existing demands, storm water -related improvements are proposed as a part of the proposed redevelopment plan. Within the Savanna, an existing storm water pond will be redesigned and upgraded to meet National Urban Runoff Protection (NURP) standards. In addition, near the Tourist Cabins site, pond construction and environmental manhole installation are necessary to treat storm water before it is discharged to Lake Phalen. The burial of overhead utility lines in the project area will be included as part of redevelopment. Overhead lines to be removed are located along Frost Avenue (from Hazelwood Street to west of East Shore Drive) and along English Street (from Ripley Avenue to Ryan Avenue). Water Resources and Storm Water Management In the proposed conditions for the Gladstone Area, the overall storm water system will be greatly improved to increase flood protection and improve storm water treatment. Under the system, runoff from within the project area is routed primarily to Round Lake and Lake Phalen. No major changes to this routing are proposed. A total of fivc (5) wetland areas were identified in the project area. These wetlands are isolated to the west side of the project from East Shore Drive to Highway 61. The shore of Lake Phalen is also considered a wetland, but was not delineated as no impacts to the shore line are planned. All efforts will be made to avoid impacting wetlands as a result of the redevelopment within the Gladstone Area. A wetland delineation report documents these wetland features. There is an existing storm water detention pond that will be modified as part of the redevelopment concept in order to improve volume control in addition to treatment potential. The Gladstone Redevelopment Master Plan will incorporate design policies and principles that seek to reduce runoff volumes and provide increased opportunities for pre- treatment of surface runoff, improving upon existing water resource impacts. Under current storm water systems, the majority of storm water is discharged into Lake Phalen or Round Lake with limited treatment in many areas. Round Lake is a listed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as impaired, and is directly connected to Lake Phalen. Therefore, the overall storm water plan seeks to provide treatment systems that will improve the quality of runoff to both water bodies. Treatment is proposed in the form of an improved storn water pond in the Savanna and placement of several sediment traps in existing storm sewer and infiltration systems throughout the study area. Flicek Park's reconfiguration as an open space and storm water overflow area (The Meadow) will provide infiltration opportunities. This Meadow area will help to manage the extreme storm water event through the hydraulic connection to the storm water pond existing on the west side of the Savanna. The proposed Savanna pond will be a wet pond (have a permanent pool of water) and will serve as the primary regionalized storm water treatment and detention area. A natural wetland infiltration basin is planned as an extension to the south portion of the Savanna pond to provide additional treatment and control flooding during an extreme rainfall event. In addition to regional system improvements, the redevelopment master plan and city policy will require developers to provide added treatment systems on -site. Streets Frost Avenue and English Street are integral parts of the Maplewood community street system. Therefore, the redevelopment of these roadways could potentially have community -wide impacts. The existing roundabout at the intersection of Frost Avenue and English Street serves as a focal point and aids in traffic calming. In addition to the roundabout, the following street improvements are proposed as a part of the redevelopment plan: • Frost Avenue (East Shore Drive to Hazelwood Street) • English Street (Gateway Trail to Ripley Avenue) • Edward Street (Frost Avenue to Ripley Avenue) • Ripley Avenue (East Shore Drive to Edward Street) • Sophia Avenue (East Shore Drive to Edward Street) • Frost Avenue and English Street (Northwest Quadrant) • `Vest of Clarence Street (Frost Avenue, to Ripley Avenue) • Frank Street (Frisbic Avenue to Frost Avenue) Construction of a bridge along Frost Avenue east of Frank Street is also included in the redevelopment plan. The bridge will serve as a pedestrian crossing and will accommodate storm drainage overflows. Traffic Related Impacts Key intersections and streets within the Gladstone redevelopment area have been analyzed to determine the impacts of the proposed redevelopment plan. The analysis was performed for existing conditions, 2030 forecast traffic volumes, and the Gladstone development scenarios. Intersections that were analyzed as a part of this study are as follows: I . TH 61 and Frost Avenue — signalized 2. TH -36 and English Street signalized 3. CR -B and English Street all -way stop 4. Frost Avenue and English Street — roundabout 5. Ripley Avenue and English Street all -way stop 6. Larpenteur Avenue and English Street — all -way stop 7. White Bear Avenue and Frost Avenue signalized The key findings of the traffic analysis indicates that the Gladstone Redevelopment Master Plan Concept will not require any mitigation measures at these key intersections with the exception of turn lane and signal modifications at the TH 61 and Frost Avenue intersection. The changes recommended at this intersection are not needed solely to accommodate this project, they reflect current deficiencies that exist at this intersection. The proposed redevelopment plan will result in fewer traffic impacts at the key intersections than if the area is developed based upon the current Comprehensive Plan due to the difference in traffic impacts generated by commercial/ industrial development patterns compared to residential. Development Staging The planned phases of the public improvement components in the project area, along with estimated start and completion dates, are as follows: • Construct bridge structure (May 2006 to November 2006) • Stormwater related improvements (May 2006 to November 2008) • Environmental cleanup of various properties within the project area (May 2006 to November 2008) • Frost Avenue and English Street improvements (May 2006 to November 2006) • Public roadway construction (May 2007 to November 2008) • Overhead utility line burial (April 2006 to July 2006) J It is anticipated that private sector development will commence in the Spring of 2006 concurrently with some of the public improvements. MITIGATION INITIATIVES The mitigation plan identifies existing tools and policies that the City of Maplewood has in place to address the types of impacts that may result through development of the AU AR project area. The plan also identifying additional initiatives that will need to be implemented to mitigate potential environmental impacts resulting from projected development of the project area. This approach goes above and beyond what is required. The objective of the mitigation initiatives are not only to mitigate potential impacts, but to also improve current conditions in the area as redevelopment occurs. In addition to general mitigation initiatives, the mitigation plan includes strategies in the following areas: • Natural and Physical Resources • Historical and Cultural Resources • Land Use Management • Erosion Control and Sedimentation • Water Supply and Appropriation • Wastewater System • Storm Water Management • Traffic Management 07112 1 Phase One Development Proposed Public Improvements Gladstone Neighborhood f� 101191'1011W" U [Ilk The City of Maplewood is currently planning for the redevelopment of the Gladstone neighborhood. The Gladstone neighborhood is generally defined as the area along Frost Avenue between Trunk Highway 61 (T.H. 61) and Hazelwood Street and the area along English Street between Ripley Avenue and the Gateway Trail. A Master Plan and an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) have been completed for the Gladstone neighborhood detailing proposed development concepts for the area. The first phase of the Gladstone redevelopment plan is proposed to include the redevelopment of the St. Paul Tourist Cabins site located in the west portion of the redevelopment area along the south side of Frost Avenue. The existing manufactured homes in this area are proposed to be replaced with a senior housing development. In order to accommodate the first phase of the redevelopment plan, the City is planning to implement infrastructure improvements including the following; • Street and sidewalk improvements along Frost Avenue and East Shore Drive. • Overhead utility burial along Frost Avenue. • Stormwater improvements in the area of the Tourist Cabins site. • Stormwater and park improvements in the area of the Gladstone Savanna. 2. PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The proposed Phase 1 public infrastructure improvements include street improvements, overhead utility burial, stormwater improvements, and Gladstone Savanna improvements as detailed below. A. Street and Sidewalk Improvements Frost Avenue is an urban collector roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Phase I of the project includes street improvements on Frost Avenue from T.H. 61 to Phalen Place. The total length of Phase I improvements along Frost Avenue is approximately 3,700 feet. The predominant existing typical section of this portion of Frost Avenue is an urban four -lane undivided section. Frost Avenue between T.H. 61 and the entrance to Keller Regional Park - Round Lake Picnic Area (approximately 1,000 feet) is four -lane divided, which narrows to two lane undivided just east of the park entrance at the existing bridge crossing the body of water connecting Keller Lake and Round Lake. The roadway then widens back to a four -lane undivided section east of the bridge. Frost Avenue is proposed to be rehabilitated with a mill and overlay in the Phase 1 area. The Phase I improvements also include proposed improvements to the existing signalized intersection of T. H. 61 /Parkway Drive /Frost Avenue at the west end of the project. These improvements are proposed to include the following: • The extension of the existing southbound left turn lane on TH 61 at Frost Avenue. • The construction of an additional left turn land for eastbound Parkway Drive atTH61 • The reconstruction/realignment of the existing right turn lane on westbound Frost Avenue at TH 61. • Traffic signal improvements at the intersection. As stated in the AUAR, improvements at this intersection should be coordinated with Ramsey County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT). The existing Frost Avenue /East Shore Drive intersection is a three -way intersection with stop control at northbound East Shore Drive. This intersection is proposed to be constructed as a roundabout similar in size to the roundabout at Frost Avenue and English Street. A roundabout will increase the capacity of the intersection while reducing delays. Additionally, the roundabout will provide opportunities for landscaping and other urban design enhancements. A roundabout justification report will need to be prepared and submitted to Mn/DOT for review and approval prior to the beginning of construction on the project. An existing bituminous trail approximately 7 feet wide runs along the north side of Frost Avenue from East Shore Drive to just west of Walter Street. The trail dead -ends several hundred feet west of the entrance to Flieek Park. This trail is proposed to be reconstructed to a 10 -foot width and extended to the east to the Flicek Park entrance. The westerly portion of the trail will require realignment in the vicinity of the proposed roundabout. Also, approximately 200 feet of the existing trail on the east side of East Shore Drive south of Frost Avenue will be realigned to accommodate the proposed roundabout. In order to accommodate pedestrians within the proposed redevelopment area, a 6 -foot concrete sidewalk is proposed to be constructed from East Shore Drive to the west and along East Shore Drive from Frost Avenue to Lake Phalen. The western limit of proposed concrete sidewalk along Frost Avenue is yet to be determined and will be based on the proposed layout of the St. Paul Tourist Cabins site redevelopment. Street trees are proposed to be added at 50 -foot intervals along Frost Avenue on both the north and south sides. Other urban design enhancements are planned for this area including additional landscaping, brick pavers, benches, and above- ground planters. 2 Existing lighting along the Phase I portion of Frost Avenue consists of cobrahead street lights mounted on alternating utility poles. These lights will be eliminated when the existing overhead utilities are buried as part of this project. New street lighting is proposed along Frost Avenue in the Phase I area to replace the cobraheads. B. Overhead Utility Burial Overhead utilities owned by Xcel Energy exist along Frost Avenue within the Phase I project limits. The overhead lines and utility poles are on the north side of Frost Avenue from T.H. 61 to the Tourist Cabins area where they cross to the south side of Frost Avenue and continue on past Phalen Place, the eastern limit of Phase I of the project. As an aesthetic improvement to the Frost Avenue corridor, this project proposes to bury the existing overhead utility for the length of the project. All work associated with burial of the existing utility lines is to be performed by Xcel Energy. C. Tourist Cabins Area Stormwater Improvements In the proposed condition for the Gladstone area, the overall stormwater system will be greatly improved to increase flood protection and improve stormwater treatment. Under the current system, runoff from within the project area is routed primarily to Round Lake and Lake Phalen, either directly or through one of the three wetlands in the area. The Tourist Cabins stormwater area includes the Tourist Cabin site, Frost Avenue from the Tourist Cabin site east to Adele Street, and East Shore Drive from Frost Avenue to just south of the Tourist Cabin site. The current Tourist Cabins Area stormwater improvement plan includes a pond sized to treat the abovementioned 12.3 acres on the Tourist Cabin site. There is approximately 44 acres of additional area within the vicinity of the Tourist Cabin area previously defined in the Gladstone AUAR. However, further evaluation indicates it is cost prohibitive to reroute the existing storm sewer to provide treatment for these additional areas within the Tourist Cabins Site or to the west. Rerouting storm sewer involves the removal and replacement of a significant amount of pavement. As an additional option for the Tourist Cabins area stormwater improvements, a pond north of Lake Phalen within the park area, just north and west of the cul -de- sac at East Shore Drive was evaluated. Without significant modifications to the current system, there is insufficient area in this location to construct a single stormwater management facility necessary to treat the 12.3 acre Tourist Cabin area. However, a series of rain gardens within the area west and south of East Shore Drive along Lake Phalen could be constructed to provide the water quality treatment proposed for the Tourist Cabin site. This rain garden area would look much like the area on the northwest shore of Wakefield Lake. The shore of Lake Phalen is considered wetland and has not been delineated. All efforts have been made to avoid impacting wetlands as a result of the redevelopment within the Gladstone area. Should the City desire the rain garden option for the Tourist Cabin Area storm water management, it is possible that some impacts to a wetland area will result. A wetland mitigation plan will need to be prepared for any impacts to wetlands. Wetland impacts are not anticipated and therefore mitigation plans have not been included in the Phase I stormwater improvements for the Tourist Cabin area. D. Savannah Improvements The majority of the Gladstone neighborhood north and east of the Savanna flows into the existing Savanna Pond under existing conditions. Because the existing inlet and outlet in the Savanna Pond are so close in proximity and elevation, the stormwater essentially by- passes the Savanna Pond. The existing stormwater detention pond on the Savanna will be modified in order to improve volume control and treatment potential by creating dead storage and infiltration capacity. The proposed Savanna pond will serve as the primary regional storm water treatment and detention area. An infiltration basin is planned as an extension to the south portion of the Savanna pond to provide a high -level of treatment for smaller storms and flood control during a 100 -year rainfall event. In addition to regional system improvements, City policy requires developers to provide added treatment systems on -site. Dead storage, or a permanent pool, will be created on the Savanna by excavating and installing an impervious liner. A liner will allow the storm pond system to be more of an aesthetic amenity to the park area. The liner is necessary because the soils found on the Savanna during the preliminary site investigation are very sandy and incapable of holding water. However, the proposed infiltration area on the Savanna site will make use of the sandy soils and will infiltrate water received from the permanent pool area. Phase I improvements on the Savanna will consist of constructing the dead storage area and installing the liner. Rough grading of the infiltration area will be completed to manage the 100 -year rainfall event on the Savanna site. Because the Savanna site was identified as a location of potential contamination during the Phase I Environmental Report (Braun Intertee, Inc, 2005), it is necessary to further refine the location of the contaminated soils. Successful completion of the grading within the Savanna relies on finding no contaminated soils within the grading area during testing. Future Phases II and III will complete the live storage grading on the Savanna site to manage the extreme event rainfall and create a smooth transition to the larger Savanna Park area. Additionally, the extreme event overflow pipe will be installed under Frost Avenue. The extreme event pipe will hydraulically connect the Savanna Pond with Flicek Park to the north. 0 • Flicek Park's reconfiguration as an open space and storm water overflow area will also provide infiltration opportunities and will help to manage the extreme storm water event. All grading at Flicek Park will take place in future Phases II or III. Appendix C. 2003 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Update Sewage Flows Gladstone Neighborhood M. � : «� m I I I I 1161 7z I 1161 • i i ' i Phase One Development Time Line Gladstone Neighborhood C,u is 4.4 N iq - . ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. .. ig O ............................. ............... 2 4-o CJ 4 W 4.4 t . ts l t6 FL o. o " EL o Q F' E' o E t5 �b C, �,G 'r,�2 o' F o 1 t . E < 2 m o !85 6 E' L - 6 1 9 0. f S a t L X I X af rl Ca E' -d W 2 a' E o .2 ' s , = 2 E c Sn a- E z 'S 15 F- o E 1 E -�o E o Z3 1 � I S o U 0 L) o s 0. w < ou M 80 0 0 o u 0) 0 'S (i .... .............. .......... .... .... ... ................ ......... ................. CL 0 o C,u �! oc cx r7 ii5 4.4 tz fll S ............................ .......................... 21 iB ;b M1 ;5 8 g g 2 i;5 ' 41 ~ 2 4.4 g g E b3 :a, E l o :2 75 -6 E QE S2 O o o o "o oo S o N N " Al i o E c o cc w E & ces '.' S? '6 E > 8 ti < E i7L E o t5 ' E E E E E E E Ti 2 FL < C) < CL o < < 0 < < d Q) U 0 N 'm ............ .......... . .... .... .... ...... ...... .............. .............. ... .... .... 7 ............................ .. ...... 2 A : :p �M p : 9 1� ao Attachment 6 Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. 1=1 911M To: Shann Finawall From: Brad Scheib, AICP Subject: Gladstone Neighborhood Plan Implementation Regulator- Framework Date: 31 January 2007 This memorandum provides an overview for the zoning approach and a framework for the ordinance that will regulate development within the Gladstone Neighborhood. This framework has been assembled so that it may serve as a basis for other districts within Maplewood with some modifications or potentially as is. The City of Maplewood's current zoning ordinance is limited in its ability to influence and shape development towards the desired pattern and form expressed through the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan. Like many zoning codes, Maplewood's existing land use regulations focus on "land use" as the principle regulating feature. Districts are organized around pennitted or conditional uses and density or lot size. Under a form-based zoning code, districts are organized more around a desired form and character of development. The form helps guide or dictate the proper use for the district. The Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan and ultimately the Comprehensive Plan establishes the desired character and f6ma of development that a regulatory structure will be built around. A form-based zoning approach will enable the City- to more clearly articulate and ultimately achieve the desired pattern and character of uses within the districts. The following outline pro-,ides the framework and content for the ordinance: Part 1--General Ordinance Items —this section covers many of the basic elements necessary for construction of a zoning ordinance. A. Title B. District Descriptions/Purpose and Intent 1. Open Space district intent is to have a single district that zones property as open space for what it is. Park lands would be included in this district. The purpose and intent would be to allow active and passive recreational uses, natural resource preservation and education, historical interpretation and public gathering. 2. Neighborhood 1-4ntent for Neighborhood I is to accommodate a predominantly lower density neighborhood consisting of single family attached homes. This district is appropriate for redevelopment areas that are adjacent to existing single family residential districts and should serve as a transition to a more intense area. 3. Neighborhood 2— intent isto accommodate a more moderate density consisting of an tixof attached housing and stacked housing. The possibility, for live-work units in this district provides for a mixed use character, however, the predominant pattern is residential. 4. Neighborhood 3-4ntent is to provide a village like development pattern with the predominant use being a true mix of residential and commercial uses. Uses may be vertically or horizontally mixed. This district 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 Ph (612) 338-0800 Fx (612) 338-6838 www.hkgi.com Direct (612) 252-7122 Email bscheibCahkgi.com Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Regulatory Framexvork 25 Januaty 2007 Page 2 would accommodate the highest level of density /intensity of all the districts and is meant to be an active urban center for the neighborhood. C. Applicability (describes where use of the district is appropriate and requires a redevelopment or master plan to be completed prior to rezoning to establish basis for district) D. Definitions (where existing zoning code does not adequately define key terms, new definitions will be added) E. Administrative procedures (this part will describe how applications are submitted and reviewed if differently than existing processes and procedures) F. Consistency with other city policies and codes required (i.e. storm water, engineering standards and building codes) Part 11 —Site and Building Standards (addressed on a district level these are the basic standards that will be applied in the district —clues for these standards will be extracted from the Gladstone Neighborhood Master Plan particularly Chapter 4) A. setbacks B. lot coverage C. lot frontage. types (porches, stoops, fences, storefronts, patios, yards, etc...) D. building frontage types (% street frontage that is principle building) E. lighting (building and site) F. signage (building and site) G. building height 11. building materials 1. building facades J. landscaping requirements K. base density/site intensity L. sidewalks and site circulation systems M. parking quantities N. parking lot design and siting O. garage placement and design P. driveu-av access Q. mechanical/utility siting and design R, public space requirements Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Regulatory Framervork 25 Januaty 2007 Page 3 S. open space /green space requirements T. others.... (this is a work in progress and others may be added) Part III — Sustainable Design Guidelines and Bonus Density Standards this section is intended to offer incentives for development projects to incorporate the sustainable and eco-hiendly design principles described in Chapter 4 of the master plan. A. Purpose of density bonuses B. Calculation of Density Bonuses C. Limits to bonuses D. Qualifying criteria and design standards a. Achievement of LEER certification b. Implementation of Low Impact Development standards (Green roofs permeable pavers cistern sy=stems resource cl cling) c. Vertical setbacks d. Alternative parking strategies C. Public circulation systems f. Public amenities (street furniture etc...) g. historical interpretation h. Accessible housing design features i. Others Part IV —use table this section will establish a table that outlines and describes uses that would be either permitted as -of- right, permitted with certain conditions or outright prohibited. This table will build off of other City of Maplewood zoning districts in terms of format and will implement directions from the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan. Attachment 7 1 Cu l I �hl Li fu 1 fu LD C: • 70 4 fu r ! / '---- ��71i ! �« '| | ' � ,,43 135 | [L |{ Lu 18 ---� i _ --------------------------- -------------------------- )'77,7 1 7.9U Lo 1 7 !B— -3 1 t6� Mai | | / / \ i 1-7710 i / | / �1 8 � � ~--- --------------------- FR!SBIE AVE N 00 RIPLEY AVE [�-T�89 u- cp 17 5 lilt | | / / \ i 1-7710 i / | / I 0 IT Q) 0z 0 M Q) cr: M M (n Attachment 9 • 4-1 C5 + C C4 - 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . I . iz - 75 -7 I.S u t- I j Attachment 9 • 4-1 E I FWAXIMMITMIM (0 1 :zz , 'QD V) Q CL L') C'o Q M (T3 0 -4 - tn Q) to 70 (13 Q) its , Q) Qp O 'QG M 0- `Qo "CLO CL ai 0 Z Q) Q) Q) 4-- O Q� Q) 0 (T,) m JZ M --------------- -- ---------------------- --------- 1 L y 0 / ! ' . ! Attach t 11 / Lo v� ! \ \ � FROST AVE ---------~' r-----------� ------------- . . % 71 \ ---------------------- SUMMER AVE ! ,,___-________________ 1 8 3-0j rx 6qav 1 N80 A L Ld 1 9" r!19 3 Ell 18�41 ED _ 1 L y 0 / ! ' . ! Attach t 11 / Lo v� ! \ \ � FROST AVE ---------~' r-----------� ------------- . . % 71 \ ---------------------- SUMMER AVE ! ,,___-________________ 1 8 3-0j rx 6qav 1 N80 A L Ld 1 9" r!19 3 Ell 18�41 ED Attachment 12 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RESOLUTION NO' WHEREAS, the applicant, the City of Maplewood, has prepared a master plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood (Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan dated December 3008\ which neighborhood i8 generally described as the properties located east VfTH 81 and the north and south sides Cf Frost Avenue and more accurately depicted in Exhibit AaS attached; and, WHEREAS, the master plan describes g desired land use pattern for the project orea that consists of single dwelling nasidenti8|, double dwelling residential, rnediUnn density nnu|Up|e dwelling, high density multiple dwelling, mixed use, open space/park, public/semi-public and regional trails; 8Dd WHEREAS, the master plan outlines a series of projects and actions that will move the Gladstone Neighborhood into the future with consistency in 8viaiOn that is commonly held by the Maplewood community and neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the master plan defines approaches to implementation that include a comprehensive plan amendment and map change and potential amendments to regulatory b}O|s; and, WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council approved the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Vn December 18thOf20O0. WHEREAS, the history of this change is on follows: {]n February S,2U05, the planning commission held 8 public hearing. City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission conducted the public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the comprehensive land use plan amendment and map change. 2. On February 26, 2007, the city council discussed the land Use plan changes. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. WHEREAS, the city council approve the above-described comprehensive land use plan amendment and map change for the following reasons: The land use plan change is based on eight specific Maplewood comprehensive plan land use and housing goals as follows: a. Provide for orderly development. b. Protect and strengthen neighborhoods. C. Pn}nnOte economic development that will expand the property tax base, increase jobs and provide desirable services. d. Minimize the land planned for streets. 9. Minimize conflicts between land VG8G. f. Provide o wide variety of housing types. g- Provide safe and attractive neighborhoods and commercial areas. h. Plan multi-family housing with an average density of at least 10 units per acre. 2. The land use plan change is based on four specific Maplewood comprehensive plan land use policies as follows: 8. Include 8 variety Vf housing types for all types Ufresidents. b. Disperse moderate-income developments throughout the city near bus lines. C. Support innovative subdivision and housing design. d. Protect neighborhoods from activities that produce excessive noise, dirt, odors or which generate heavy traffic. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: The City of Maplewood adopts the entire Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan dated December of 2006, attached as Exhibit B, as an amendment to the city's comprehensive plan. The following land use designations will describe the Gladstone neighborhood and the allowable densities within those designations and will be adopted as part of the comprehensive plan: Gladstone yW8diUnn (G-M) - 7 to 12 unites per acre Gladstone High /G-N\-12to3O units per acre Gladstone Mixed-Use -20LV3U units per acre The forgoing resolution Om3 dated this 26 th day of February, 2007. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Diana Longd8.Mayor Attest: Karen E. Guilfoile, City Clerk and seconded by 2