Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 01-08 City Council Packet5:00 p.m. CLOSED Session with Attorneys Pam VanderWiel, Chuck Bethel and ff Alan Kantrud-PendinoLitigation 6:00 p.m. [ouncillManagerWonkshop-Street Reconstruction Program AMENDED AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:08 P.M. K8Vnd8y, January 8, 2007 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 07-01 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Acknowledgement of Maplewood Residents Serving the Country C. ROLL CALL Mayor's Address onProtocol: "Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council. It is our desire to keep all discussions civil as we work through difficult issues tonight, If you are here for o Public Hearing orbo address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with the Policies and Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. When you address the council, please state your name and address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and Council. I then will direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments. " D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes from the December 11.2OO8 City Council Meeting 2. Minutes from the December 18, 2006 City Council Meeting Desoto Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project O6-10 8. Public Hearing lO0prn b. Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 votes) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted bv one motion. |f@ member 0f the City Council wishes tO discuss Gn item, that item will bR removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval OfClaims 2. Approval 0f2OO7 Animal Control Contract 3. Temporary Gambling Permit — Carver Elementary 4. Annual Gambling License Resolution — Hill Murray Mother's Club 5. Approve Emergency Repair Of Sanitary Sewer Main G. Approve Purchase Of Bobcat 58O0 Turbo Work Machine/Tool Cat 7. Approve Arbor Day Proclamation O. Gladstone North Area Streets, City Project U4-15 1818 Kennard Street for Flooding Damage Amended 01.05.07 K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS North St. Paul Electric Franchise Tax Ordinance — 2 nd Reading L. NEW BUSINESS 1. Liquor License Application — Kenneth 8UdfO8. Cub Discount Liquor St0r8-1O0VV.COUntv Road 2. Liquor License Application — Edward Bremer, Heritage Liquor —1347 Frost Avenue 3. Annual Renewal of Liquor Licenses C)ff-S8|R,{]n-s8|e. Wine and Club 4. Annual City Council Appointments 5. Rules of Procedure for Public Hearings S. Discontinuation ofPre-Agenda 7. Purchase Of ATM Machines for City Hall and the Community Center 8. Saint Clair Hills (Carver Avenue, east Of 1-494) 8. Moratorium Variance b. Rezoning ( ( S. 2007 Membership Due Payments to Municipal Le i | Liv8ConnnniSsion8ndAsSVCi8UVnVf Metropolitan Municipalities no Cities) (Item added DY.D 0 10. Citizen Advisory Boards and Commissions Policies (Item added 0/.05.07) M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS r o Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this service must be made at least 9S hours inadvance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (051) 240-2801 to nnSk8 8rr8ng8nn8nL8. Assisted Listening Devices are also 8v8i|8U|e. P|8S88 check with the City Clerk for availability. Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It/S hoped that bvfollowing these si nuleaevGryJne'S opinions can be heard and understood /na reasonable manner. N/e appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, d/s understood that everyone will follow these principles: Sh0w/re8peCt/bre8ChO/her,8otively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful la nguage. Amended 01.05.07 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:20 P.M. Monday, December 11, 2006 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 06-33 I loll Council Retreat Bob Cardinal Letter E. APPROVAL OF MI nager Workshop Ayes-All Special City Council Meeting Agenda Item El 11, and was called to order at Ayes-Mayor Longrie, Councilmembers Cave, Hjelle and Rossbach Abstain-Councilmember Juenemann Minutes the November 27, 2006 Council/Manager Workshop Councilmember Cave moved to approve the minutes from the November 27, 2006 Council/Manager Workshop as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All City Council Meeting 12-11-06 1 A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at 7:20 P.M. by Mayor Longrie. Pit] *41;9=14111111 xd F-11 k' Is]= MIT . STRWOWYMM Diana Longrie, Mayor Rebecca Cave Councilmember Erik Hjelle, Councilmember Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Will Rossbach, Councilmember APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. Minutes from the November 27, 2006 City Council Meeting K8eyorLongho moved to aggrove the minutes from the November 27, 2006 City Council Meeting as amended. Seconded hvC0Unci|nnennber|UeUe | 5. Minutes from the November 30.2808 Continuation Vf the 11-27-00 City Council Meeting Councilmember Cave Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All F. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1 Robert F--- r-,r-- Deputy elimination of the Deputy Police Chief position. _ Nancy _ ____ry_- 1034 West Lake Road, Rice, commented on what she felt were violations of MN Statutes. 3. William Kayser, 040881' 9 property known as Woodhill had recently passed away. ' --.-__--= 1955 Greenbrier _Maplewood, referred to a recent article by the former Mayor Robert Cardinal and the salary survey published in the city news. _ -_'n Nephew, fo discussion published salary survey was a bit misleading due to the percentage of salaries published. S. Christeen Stone, shared her disappointment with recent city changes that she felt will cost the city money in the long run. 7. Mindy Macrunnel, 1890 Adele Street, Maplewood, suggested better communication and follow through by city staff. 8. Al Galbraith, 1770 Edward Street, Maplewood, expressed concern that the only city publicity recently has been focused on negative. He would like to see the Maplewood motto "tooether we can" awlied. S. Shirley Linwood Court, Maplewood, commented on county taxes, union status and city salaries. G. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1 Resolution of Appreciation — Jinn KaCzrovva|d 8. Planner Roberts presented the report. Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following resolution of appreciation for Planning Commissioner Jim Kaczrowski: City Council Meeting 12-11-08 2 JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION 06-12-146 IN WHEREAS, Jim K8cznovvski has been o member of the Maplewood Planning Commission since April 11, 2005. and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has appreciated hiSBxp8h8mC8 and good judgment and VVHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, with betterment of the Cho of Maplewood; and ^� .hor the WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consistently contributed his leadership, time and effort for the benefit of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens, that Jim Kaczrowski is hereby extended our heartfelt gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service, and we wish him continued success in 8 Seconded by MayorL0ngrie | 3. Steve OVbih8|— Eagle Scout P roject a. Councilmember Cave commended Life Scout Steven Dobihal for the Eagle Scout Project he completed at the Maplewood Nature Center. b. Steven Dobihal, Life Scout, 1276 Lark Avenue, Maplewood, explained his Eagle Scout project at the Maplewood Nature Center: Steven and his volunteers created and installed 12 markers for a self guided trail at the Maplewood Nature Center. They represent 12 different interpretive points along the trail and correspond with an activity sheet and kiosk signs at the front entrance. Council thanked Steve for his hard work and dedication to the nature center. LIC HEARINGS 1. Proposed 2007 Property Tax Levy and Adoption of the 2007 Budget a. Adoption of Resolution Setting the 2007 Tax Levy b. Adoption of 2007 Ambulance Rates C. Resolution Adopting the 2007 Budget 8. City Manager Copeland presented the report. b. Mayor L0~~h8 opened the public hearing, calling for proponents 0r opponents. The follow persons were heard: Peter Fisher, 2344Gt8ndhdoe Avenue, Maplewood John Nephew, 028E County Road B..Maplewood Shirley Krause, 24U8 Linwood Court, Maplewood Carolyn Peterson, 1801 Gervais Avenue, Maplewood C. Mayor Longrie closed the public hearing. City Council Meeting 12-11-08 3 Councilmember Cave moved to adopt the followinq resolution certifVinq taxes payable in 2007: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TAXES PAYABLE UN2007 06-12447 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that: 1. The follow amounts of taxes be lev for 2006, payable in 2007, upon the net tax capacity in sa City of Maplewood, for the following purposes: ^�N Operations Debt 88mic8S TOTALLEVY $12,405,850 2 2. |O addition, there iSG$703,000 market va based refer( the debt service ODthe 2002 Open Space Refunding Bon 3. The next tax capacity based levy of $2,437,800 for Debt Service ani levy of$7U3.U0O total $3.140.800. This i38 net decrease ' O $4,061,872.79. The breakdown by Debt Service Fund follows as E, son OPEN SPACE REF 6 G BONDS - 2002D 111034mi Seconded by Mayor Longrie for 2006 payable in 2007 to finance 2000 Fire Safety Bonds. the market value based referendum '2.79 in the scheduled levv of SCHEDULED ADOPTED INCREASE LEVY LEVY (DECREASE) 133.070.00 16,743.00 57,986.00 89,600.00 11.014.00 r 314,428.00 317.40080 2.072.00 0.00 0.880.00 6.880.00 175.744.40 174.600.00 (1.144.40) 2 - (32.700.00) 245,201.00 269.800.00 24.699.00 518.714.00 526.000.00 7.286.00 628,331.00 339,900.00 (289 406.841.00 385.600.00 (21.341.00) 163.515.00 165.100.00 1.585.00 16.847.88 - (16.647.68) 318.027.45 - (318.027.45) 208,787.00 185,270.00 (23 53.909.00 50.800.00 (3.106.00) 180.879.95 188.700.00 27.820.05 57 - (57 450.226.43 287.590.00 (182.836.43) 135,408.88 60.890.00 (75.018.88) $4.061.87279 3.140.800.00 (031 Ayes-Mayor LOnghe 8nd|UeUe Nay8-CVVnCi|nnennbersJUenenn8nnand Roaaboch City Council Meeting 12-11-08 4 rates: RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2007 AMBULANCE RATES 06 -12 -148 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is authorized to impose reasonable charges for emergency and paramedic ambulance services by Minnesota Statutes 471.476 and by special laws (Chapter 426, Laws of 1975, and Chapter 743, Laws of 1978); and WHEREAS, it is fair and reasonable to charge for services person is transported and by type of services provided; i.e., basic' defined by Medicare. 2007: Councilmember Cave moved to adopt the following resolution adopting the 2007 Ambulance NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Base rates: Non - transport (treatment administered) Basic life support ambulance services Advanced life support ambulance services 1 Advanced life support ambulance services 2 Rate per mile transported BE IT FU administered trea or when the pati BE IT FU will be pro -rated red based upon the distance a lanced life support services as ng charges "So $ • 11 effective January 1, harge when the patient has not been transported to the detoxification center, that if more than one person is transported, the ambulance charges Ayes-All Imember C RESOLUTION 06 -12 -149 TION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR 2007 BE IT RES budget for 2007 is ER RESOLVED, that there shall be n it and is not transported, when the patier transported in a squad car. M Estimated Balances 01 -01 -07 Revenues Net other increases (decreases) Expenditures Estimated Balances 12 -31 -07 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that a as outlined in the following summary: OPERATING BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET DEBT SERVICE BUDGET TOTAL $39,721,067 $1,164,774 $8,855,748 $49,741,589 31,183,650 1,320,580 4,969,600 $37,473,830 (298,380) (86,570) 474,260 $89,310 (29,983,890) (822,840) ( 6, 5 76,2 9 0) ($37,383,020) $40,622,447 $1,575,944 $7,723,318 $49,921,709 City Council Meeting 12 -11 -06 5 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the department appropriations totaling $29,983,890 as listed in the budget booklet are hereby approved for the 2007 Operating Budget. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the expenses for the Community Center Operations Fund may exceed the appropriation provided that the net operating income before other revenues and expenses excluding depreciation for 2007 is not less than $94,690. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 2007 Capital Improvements Budget: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS $90,040 FIRE TRUCK REPLACEMENT 20 LEGACY VILLAGE TAX ABATEMENT DISTRICT 120 OPEN SPACE 230 PARK DEVELOPMENT 500,,640 REDEVELOPMENT 920 TAX INCREMENT ECONOMIC DEV. DISTRICT #1 -5 26,430 TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -1 430 TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -2 430 TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -3 440 TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -4 30,490 TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -5 25,290 TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -6 60,310 TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -7 19,920 TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT 1 -8 66,020 WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE — NO. ST. PAUL 140 WATER AVAILABILITY CHANGE — ST. PAUL 970 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $822,840 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director shall establish a budget for each public improvement project when the Council orders the project and that the budget amounts shall be recorded at amounts specified in the feasibility study for the project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 2007 Debt Service Budget: AI III r• i • 1 , i • i $6,576,290 Principal Interest Paying Agent Fees Fees for Service Interest — Interfund loans Investment Management TOTAL DEBT SERVICE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above budgets for Governmental Funds are hereby adopted for financial reporting and management control. City Council Meeting 12 -11 -06 6 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above budgets for all other funds are hereby adopted for management purposes only. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the transfer of appropriations among the various accounts, within a fund, shall only require the approval of the City Manager or his designee. However, City Council approval is required for transfers from contingency accounts. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all appropriations which are not encumbered or expended at the end of the fiscal year shall lapse and shall become part of the unencumbered fund balance which may be appropriated for the next fiscal year except appropriations for capital improvement projects which shall not lapse until the project is completed or canceled by the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $173,000 of the fund balance in the General Fund is designated for contingencies. Seconded by Mayor Longrie A Councilmember Rossbach Motion died for lack of a second. Councilmember Cave rie, Councilmembers Cave and Hjelle ibers Juenemann and Rossbach r14 Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-Mayor Longrie, Councilmembers Cave, and Hjelle Nays- Councilmembers Juenemann and Rossbach Mayor Longrie announced a 10 minute recess. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Juenemann moved to table the CUP for Woodhill (Agenda Item 15) until the Deceml: 18 City Council Meetina to allow the Citv Attornev to determine if the death of the orMertv owner Seconded by Mayor Longrie Ayes-All Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve consent agenda item 1 with a friendly am Councilmember Hielle that an itemized attorney bill (if applicable) be included with each a claims. Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve consent agenda items 2, 3 and 4. Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve consent agenda item 6. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All IM City Council Meeting 12-11-06 7 1 . Approval of Claims ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 406 Checks #7141OUl0#71457 doted 11/21/00thru 11/28/U8 $ 324 Disbursements via debits t0 checking account interest at the rate of eight percent dated 11/17/08LhrU 11/24/08 $ 550,771.77 Checks #Y1458thnJ#71532 dated 12/05/06 $ 94,941.88 Disbursements via debits k}checking IDENTIFICATION dated 11/27/08thrU 11/3O/08 ` $ 1.377.03448 Total Accounts Payable $ 471,782.47 Payroll Checks and Direct 1 $ 2 Payroll Deduction check #1 dated 12/01/06 $ 474,087.72 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 2. Assessments for False Alarm Bills Adopted the following resolution to certify false alarm payable in 2007: sm rges for collection with property taxes RESOLUTION 06-12-150 RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the following delinquent false alarm charge for collection with the taxes of said property owner for the year 2006, collectible in 2007, and which includes interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) on the total amount for one year: PROPERTY ACCOUNT STREET ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION AMOUNT* T Mobile 3001 White Bear Avenue 02.29.22.23.0009 $27.00 Maplewood Mall 3001 White Bear Avenue 02.29.22.23.0009 $216.00 Maplewood Manor 2266 Duluth 09.29.22.44.0158 $540.00 Auto Zone 751 Century Avenue 25.29.22.44.0049 $124.20 T Mobile USA, Inc. 3035 White Bear Avenue 02.29.22.21.0016 $27.00 ON Navy 3001 White Bear Avenue 02.28.22.23.0009 $43.20 Kentucky Fried Chicken 1A38 Beam Avenue 02.28.22.31.0058 $54.00 Real Estate Facilities 501 Marquette Avenue 18.20.22.14.0011 $27.00 Joann Etc. 173S Beam Avenue 03.29.22.14.0015 $43.20 Corner Kick 1357 Cope Avenue 10.20.22.32.0014 $367.20 TOTAL $1 ' 468.80 *Amount includes O% interest. City Council Meeting 12-11-08 8 3. Assessments for Ambulance Bills Adopted the follow p9so|Vtk}n to certify $2O 8rnbV|8nce bills as special assessment for collection with 2007 property taxes with interest at the rate of eight percent on the total amount for one year: RESOLUTION 06-12-151 RES OLVED, C ity Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the attached ambulance service charges totaling $20,120.14 for collection with the taxes of said property owner for the year 2006, collectible in 2007 with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) on the total amount for one year. rd 5 � Home Occupation License Review — Grupa (1 994 Du Approved h3 review the home occupation license for the photography studio 1994 Duluth Street again in one year (December 2OOY) or sooner if a pr0b|8nn arises or if Mr. 8G 8 major change to his home business. Conditional Use Permit Review —\8k}odhiU LinvvV�d/\v��u�\ ` � ' Item tabled to the December 18, 2008 City Council Meeting. County Road D Extension (H8zi Extension (West of TH 61), City Adopted the follow reso req County Road [) extension projects, / Project 02 and County Road D e TH81) City Project and County Road O ?-08: Approve Resolution for State Aid Variance variance from State Aid Ope rations Rules for the :)ad D Extension (Hazelwood b3TH61).City (West of TH 61), City Project 02 NA&TOMM 121 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood opened bids in advance of receiving state aid approval of final plans and specifications for the County Road D Extension projects (MSAP's 138-112-05, 138-121-03 and 138-020-29), and WHEREAS, said approval is required by State Aid Rules Chapter 8820.2800 subpart 2 to be eligible for municipal State Aid funding, and Extension it was necessary to open bids early to further advance the County Road D NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEVVO{)D. That the council hereby requests ovariance from said rules and directs the City Engineer k) appear before the State Aid Variance Committee and explain the need for variance and the reasons why the project was let before State Aid approval was given. City Council Meeting 12-11-08 J. AWARD OF BIDS None K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None L. NEW BUSINESS 1 Alley Vacation - Driscoll (south of Frost Avenue and east a. Planner Roberts presented the report. b. Commissioner Grover, representing the Maplewo the Planning Commission report. C. Judith Driscoll, the applicant, was present for cou Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the followin IdESURID-51 r Street) Planning Commission, presented it questions. esolution for the vacation of the WHEREAS, Ms. Judith Driscoll of 1896 Walter Street applied for the vacation of the following alley: That north-south alley in Block 3, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, that is between a point 113 feet south of the south right-of-way line of Frost Avenue and the north right-of-way line of Fenton Avenue and between Walter Street and Phalen Place as shown on the plat of Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota (in Section 16, Township 29, Range 22). , the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On November 20, 2006, the planning commission held a public hearing about this proposed vacation. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council ar)r)rove the vacation. 2. On December 11, 2006, the city council reviewed this proposal. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, the public fee title interest in the property will go to the following described properties: 1. 1907 Phalen Place (PIN 16-29-22-42-0010) 2. 1899 Phalen Place (PIN 16-29-22-42-0011) 3. 1893 Phalen Place (PIN 16-29-22-42-0012) 4. 1101 Fenton Avenue (PIN 16-29-22-42-0013) 5. 1896 Walter Street (PIN 16-29-22-42-0014) City Council Meeting 12-11-06 10 NOW, THEREFORE, BE[T RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city and the property owner do not need or use the alley in ques for street or access purposes. 3. The properties adjacent ho the alley have ad equate This vacation is subject to the city keeping 8 drainage 88S8rneni over the vacated alley inquestion. Seconded bvC0uDC|[nSmbBrH�el|S | 2. VV8| (Northeast Corner of White B ear Lot Division Land Use Plan Amendment (LBC to BC) Zoning Map Change (LBC to BC) Design Review — P 'F --r b. John Kohler, Architect, Semper Development, C. d. n. Mayor Matt Reagan |sSV88. Scott Reagan, Meer the fr,n]pn8 ission report. §� xm Meer C , answered for council questions. addressed sidewalk Planning Commission, presented ons) and is subiect to the a revised survey to approval which shows the following: 2) Location and legal description of a utility and access easement on the east side of Parcel A to accommodate utilities and access for the property to the north (2950 White Bear Avenue) and access for the property to the east (Parcel B). 3) Location and legal descr Of8n access easement on the north side ofParcel A8nU the south side Vf the property k} the north (2B5O White Bear Avenue) b]accommodate the driveway Vn the north side [f the VVa|gr88n8' building and the shared curb cut Vn White Bear Avenue. 4\ Locat and legal description of a ten-foot-w roadway easement along White Bear Avenue the entire length of Parcel A to accommodate for future roadway widening. b. Deeds descr the two new legal descr for Parcels A and B, including the required utility, access, and roadway easement descriptions described above. C. Deeds must bBrecorded with Ramsey County within one year 0f the date Of lot division approval or the lot division will become null and void (city code requirement). City Council Meeting 12-11-08 11 d. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit for the proposed Walgreens retail store and pharmacy on Parcel A, the following must be submitted to staff for approval: 1\ Proof that Ramsey County has recorded the deeds. 2) A signed oertifiCate0fsurveyf0rPgrCe|AshOvvngthe|oS8tOmof8Upropedv|ineS building, parking, driveway, fneeatonding sign, and easements. Seconded bvCoVnd|memb9rCave Ayes-All Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following comprehensive land use plan change resolution. This resolution changes the comprehensive land use plan for the newly subdivided 1.54 acre western lot (Parcel A) n the vacant lot located on the northeast corner of Beam an White Bear Avenues from Limited Business Commercial (LBC) to Business Commercial (BC): COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN CHANGE WHEREAS, 8ennp9r Development, representing VV8| applied f0r change to the city's comprehensive land use plan from Limited Business Commercial /LBC\to Business ConnnnerCi8| (BC). WHEREAS, this change applies b] the w the northeast corner of Beam and White Bear /\ 2006, Lot Split Boundary Exhibit). WHEREAS, the property WHEREAS, the legal de etof the vacant property located On arcel A as described in the October 5, number for is . as fol That part of the South 284.96 feet of the South 731.5 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29 North, Range 22 lying East of the center line of White Bear Avenue, Except the part thereof described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, said point being 175 feet Northerly of the South line of said Southeast Quarter; thence Northerly 556.5 feet along the East line; thence 354.5 feet due West; thence 350 feet due South; thence in a Southeasterly direction to a point which is 120 feet due West of the point of beginning; thence Northwesterly along last said line 166.75 feet to the north line of the said South 284.96 feet; thence along last said north line, South 89 degrees 19 minutes 05 seconds West a distance of 94.73 feet; thence deflecting left 90 degrees, South 00 degrees 40 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 284.96 feet to the east / west quarter line of said Section 2; thence along said east /west quarter line, North 89 degrees 19 minutes 05 seconds East to the center of said Section 2; thence northerly along the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2 a distance of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning; according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Subject to the right of way for Beam Avenue and White Bear Avenue and encumbrances as shown on an ALTA survey prepared by Houston Engineering dated March 24, 2006. Containing approximately 67,013 square feet. VVHEFlE/\S the history of this change is as follows: On November 20 the planning commission held 8 public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice inthe Maplewood Review and sent notices b} the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone 8t the hearing 8 chance k} speak and present written statements prior tVtheir recommendation. 2. {]D December 11,20O0. the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. City Council Meeting 12-11-06 12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED that the city council approved the above- described Ch8DgBtOthB|onduS8p|8Dforthefo|kJvvnQreGSODa: 1. Provide for orderly development. 2. Protect and strengthen neighborhoods. 3. Promote economic development that will expand the property tax base, increase jobs and provide desirable services. 4. Minimize the land planned for streets. 5. Minimize conflicts between land uses. 0. Prevent premature VS8, overcrowding, or services and facilities, such as utilities, dr 7. Help t0 implement the goals Ofthe a\ The city will not approve new d facilities and services, such as street, ut U) Safe and adequate will be C) Transitions between distinctly diffe negative economic, social, or phys d) Whenever possible, changes in tyr uses front on the same street or at made or natural barriers. id use should occur so that similar of areas separated by major nnon- vithih8Ch8r8CterVfe8chneighUorhVod. M Group compatible businesses in SUit8b|8 areas. - g) Avoid disruption of adjacent Or nearby residential areas. Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All ING MAP CHANGE RESOLUTION 06-12-154 nOp8r Development, representing VV@kx[8BnS. applied for 8 change t0the city's zoning map from Limited Business Commercial /LBC\tO Business COnnrn8ncia| (BC). WHEREAS, this change applies to the west 253 feet of the vacant property located on the northeast corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues (Parcel A as described in the October 5, 2006, Lot Split Boundary ExhibiL). WHEREAS, the property identification number for the property isO2-29-22-24-O004. VV|fEFlEAS the |8Q8| description for Parcel Ais as follows: land especially when supportive enlS. or streets are not 8v8||ab|8. :)Ian including: vithout providing for adequate s. drainage, parks, and open space. for all properties. Dg types of land uses should not create G ,al impact on adjoining developments. City Council Meeting 12-11-08 13 That part Vfthe South 284.88 feet Ufthe South 731.5 feet of the Southeast Quarter Of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29 North, Range 22 lying East of the center line of White Bear Avenue, Except the part thereof described as follows: Beginning 8t8 point On the East line [f the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter Vf Section 2, Township 2S, Range 22. said point being 175 feet Northerly of the South line of said Southeast Quarter; thence Northerly 556.5 feet along the East line; thence 354.5 feet due West; thence 350 feet due South; thence in a Southeasterly direction to a point which is 12U feet due West Vfthe point Vfbeginning; thence Northwesterly along last said line 108.75 feet to the north line of the said South 284.96 feet; thence along last said north line, South 89 degrees 19 minutes 05 seconds West a distance of 94.73 feet; thence deflecting left 90 degrees, South 00 degrees 40 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 284.96 feet to the east / west quarter line of said Section 2; thence along said east /west quarter line, North 89 degrees 19 minutes 05 seconds East to the center of said Section 2; thence northerly along the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2 a distance of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning; according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Subject to the right of way for Beam Avenue and White Bear Avenue and encumbrances as shown on an ALTA survey prepared by Houston Engineering dated March 24, 2006. Containing approximately 67,013 square feet. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1 On November 20 2006, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements prior to their recommendation. 2. {}n December 1 use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOVV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described change in the zoning map lfor the following reasons: The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. ff- R 4 would have DO negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such 8S public water, S8vverG. police and fire protection, and schools. Seconded by Councilmember CGv8 Ayes-All Mayor Lo he moved to approve the plans date-stamped October 2, 2006, and the revised landscape plan and building elevations date-stamped December 11, 2006, for the Walgreen's retail store and drive-through pharmacy to be located on the northeast corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues. Approval is subiect to the applicant doing the following: Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. Prior t0 issuance 0f8grading or building permit, the applicant must submit bJ staff for approval the following items: City Council Meeting 12-11-08 14 1\ Revised grading/drainage/utility plans which comply with all city engineering department requirements as specified in the November 20, 2006, engineering report including, but not limited to, the granting 0f8right-0f-w@y easement along White Bear Avenue and the submittal of an escrow to the city to ensure C0nsLrUCLiOn of six-foot-wide SidRvv8|k along the e*tifA length of Beam Avenue Lobe complete by the city in 2008. 2\ Revised site plan showing a bike rack to be located near the building 5) A revised lighting and photometrics plan which shows that the overall illumination frDOl outdoor lights does not exceed A-foot-candles at all property lines. G\ Obtain Ramsey County for construction on county i for the driveway access, utility work, and sidewalk. 7) Watershed district approval if revisions warrant a new review. 8 0f credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall U81 the cost of the work. Signage on the property is part of the design review approval and is subject to the following sign 1 One freestanding sign to be located on the corner of Beam and White Bear Avenue. Freestanding sign to be a maximum of 15 feet in height, 60 square feet in area, maintain a 10-foot setback to all property lines and comply with traffic visibility requirements. 2) Two Walgreens wall signs to be located on the south and west elevation. Signs to be constructed of individual letters with a maximum letter height of two feet and must be centered within the manufactured limestone facade. 3\ Two one-hour photo signs and two pharmacy signs h3b9k]CatedOntheGOuth and west elevation. Signs to be constructed of individual letters with 8 nn8xinnUnn letter height of 1.5 feet, and must be centered within the manufactured limestone piers, above the windows. 4\ One drive-through pharmacy directional sign to be located above the standing seam nneto| roof on the south elevation. Sign to be constructed of individual letters with o maximum letter height of 1.5 feet. 5) One interior entrance tower neon sign, 22 square feet in area. City Council Meeting 12-11-08 15 d. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying thebuiWiOg: 1) Replace any property irons removed because 0f this construction. 2\ Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. 3\ Install all required landscaping and underground irrigation. 4) Screen the rooftop h i | equipment. 5) Install all required outdoor lighting. e. U any required work i3 not done, the city may allow 1\ The city determines that the work is not essential tothepublic health, safety Vrwelfare. 2) The above-required letter of credit or all required exterior improvements. unfinished exterior improvements winter, or within six weeks of occVpG| - h escrow ihldbvthe City of Maplewood for owner or contractor shall complete any e 1 if occupancy of the building is in the fall or of N the building occupancy isbn the spring 0r [ All work shall follow the approved plans. The director minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. C0uDC| Ayes-All Councilmember Cave would like to see a following topics: unity development may approve retreat scheduled in January and proposed the 0 Team Building 0 Gladstone Phase 11 0 Setting Policies 0 Fiscal Disparities 0 Rental Property Control Ordinance member Cave also challenged each and every CVUnci|memb8rk} attempt working r as a team. 2. Bob Cardinal Letter-Comment from the Mayor Mayor Longrie stated that Katie 0|nner with the Maplewood Review called her recently for comments - regarding o letter from former Mayor Bob Cardinal. AS the Mayor had n0knowledge Vf the letter, Ms. Zi||nn8r faxed the four page letter k} Mayor LVnQh8. After having the opportunity to read the letter and due to the grammar used, writing style, syntax, way things were stated and facts in the letter, the Mayor, iO her h88rt-0f-heGdO does not believe her friend Mr. Cardinal wrote the letter. None City Council Meeting 12-11-08 16 O. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Longrie adjourned at 12:35 a.m. City Council Meeting 12-11-06 17 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, December 18, 2006 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 06-34 'I A A I A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at City 7:02 P.M. by Mayor Longrie. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Diana Longrie, Mayor Present Rebecca Cave Councilmember Present Erik Hjelle, Councilmember Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Longrie moved to approve the agenda as amended. M1. NEST Update G1. Move Item L6 to G1 G2. City Attorney Presentation M2. News Bulletin — Livable Communities Grant M3. Recent Newspaper Article Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All APPROVAL OF MINUTES Agenda Item E2 nd was called to order at 1. Minutes from the December 4, 2006 Special City Council Meeting Mayor Longrie moved to approve the minutes from the December 4, 2006 Special City Council Meetin as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Tom McDonough Tom McDonough, 660 Eldridge Avenue, Maplewood, expressed his gratitude to Police Chief Thomalla and Fire Chief Lukin and their staff for the respect and consideration his family received throughout the previous week and during the memorial service honoring his son Sergeant Brian McDonough. 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 1 9 2. Nancy Lazaryan, 10734 West Lake Road, Rice, commented on an ongoing lawsuit and recent data practices requests. 3. Bill Kayser, 6408 81S Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, also remarked on recent data practices requests. 4. John Nephew, 628 E. County Road B, spoke regarding city lawsuits and increased taxes. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS 1. Appointments to Rice Street Corridor Study Task Force a. Public Works Director Ahl presented the report. Councilmember Hjelle moved to appoint Kathleen Juenemann as the councilmember representative to the Rice Street Corridor Task Force: Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-Mayor Longrie, Councilmembers Cave, Hjelle and Rossbach Abstain-Councilmember Juenemann Councilmember Hjelle Force: Business Member: Ernie Schroeder, Schroeder Milk Community Member: Michael Grover, Maplewood Planning Commission Staff Liaison: City Engineer AN Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All Councilmember Juenemann requested that Councilmember Rossbach be the alternate for the Rice Street Corridor Task Force if she were unable to attend a meeting. 2. Resolution of Appreciation for John Hinzman a. Senior Planner Ekstrand presented the report. Imember Ju RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION 06-12-155 WHEREAS, John Hinzman has been a member of the Maplewood Community Design Review Board for one year and eight months, since March 28, 2005, and has served faithfully in that capacity; and WHEREAS, the Community Design Review Board has appreciated his experience, insights and good judgment; and 12-18-06 City Council Meeting WHEREAS, Mc Hinznl8n has freely given of his time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment Of the City 0f Maplewood; and VVHERE/\S, Mr. HiDznl8D has shown dedication to his duties and has consistently contributed his leadership and effort for the benefit [f the City. NC}VV. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf Ofthe City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens that John HiDzDl8DiShereby extended our gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service. Seconded hvCounci|me0ber0elle | 3. Presentation Vf Proposed City Vf Maplewood 50 Year Anniversary the Histor Preservation Commission a. Ron Cockriel, 943 Century, presented the report. CoUnci|nlemb8rJuen8m@nn moved to Seconded bvCoVn[j|nlennb8rH�elle 4. City Attorney Report a. City Attorney Kantrud p Mr. K8ntRud shared a letter n3ceiv8dfm on article in the |Star Tribune dated 12- The letter from e Cnu 10% ~~ office dated December n regarding citizen complaint. question ,ill be available on the city website for public a. Senior Planner Ekstrand presented the report. b. Brandon Bourdon, Kimley Horn & Associates, addressed council. C. Bruce Mogren, Mogren Development Company, was present for council d. Dave Sellegren, Land Use Attorney representing CarMax, addressed council. e. Joe Jagdmann, Real Estate Manager representing CarMax, addressed council. [ Chuck Patterson, Architect for the project, answered council questions. g. Dan Hughes, Landscape Engineer, was presented for council questions. h. Boardmember Shankar presented the Design Review Board report. 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 3 Mayor LOOghe opened the public hearing, calling for proponents O[ opponents. The following persons were heard: None Mayor Longrie closed the public hearing. CoVnC|m8rnbHrRosSb8Ch moved to adopt the followinci resolution awroving a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the CarMax/Mogren Addition Development to include all 18 conditions: CON 56 FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, Cann8x and Bruce K8cgremapplied for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development LV develop 8C8nnax used-car dealership on the former Country View Golf Course property; WHEREAS, this permit applies to the northeast corner of B880 Avenue and Highway The |RgG| description is: Lot 1, Carma WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as 1. On December 5, 2006, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published - hearing notice in the Maplewood . The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve this conditional use permit. 2. The city council reviewed this request on December 18, 2006. The council considered the reports and recommendations Vfthe city staff and planning commission. NOVV.THEREFO use permit revision becat a with the City's Compreh 2. The use would not change that the city council approved the above-described conditional gn8d, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity Plan and Code of Ordinances. isting or planned character of the surrounding area. J. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other 5. The use would gRm8[@t8 only noiniDlG| vehicular traffic OO k}C8| Stn}8tS and vvOu|d not C[8@t8 traffic congestion 0r unsafe access 0D existing Or proposed streets. O. The use would be served hv adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage strUc[ureS, water and sewer systems, SohOO|a and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 8. The use would maximize the preservation 0f and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause rninirn8| adverse environmental effects. Approval iS subject t0 the following conditions: 1. The development shall follow the plans date-stamped October 20.2000. except where the city requires changes. The director Cf community development may approve ° minor changes. 3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The odv council shall review this permit in 4. This approval permits the development of the Carmax site subject to the conditions of the city council. The future development sites are not approved at this time. The developers of these sites must submit all necessary applications and materials for evaluation of those plans as required by the city 5. If the watershed district allows their twin drainage pipes to be relocated above grade as an open channel, the PUD shall also require that all developments within the Carmax/Mogren Addition actively and regularly pick up all litter from their parking lots to keep debris from entering this open channel. G. The applicants shall comply with the Plan Review dated November 21 Erin [8ber8e and Michael 7. The applicants shall also comply with the requirements listed in these plan-review reports as follows: * The Drainage and Wetland Report by DuWayne Konewko dated November 22, 2006. • The wetland and rainwater garden landscaping comments by Ginny Gaynor dated November ' • The watershed district comments by Tina Carstens dated November 21, 2006. 8. The outdoor vehicle storage area is allowed. The outward-facing fagade of the screening wall shall be brick to match the building. 9. The pervious paving method proposed within the shoreland boundary area shall meet the requirements of the shoreland ordinance. This shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. 10. Vehicle transports shall not use public right-of-way for loading or unloading. 11. The site plan shall be revised for the city engineer's approval relocating the Highway 61 driveway to the north at County Road D. This driveway shall be located 8S far east 8spossible. This driveway shall remain gated 81 all times except when needed for vehicle test drives which i8 its proposed and permitted use. 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 5 12. The dealership shall not store any mater 0[ supplies 0O the outside 0f the building, except for what they store in the dumpster enclosure. 13. The dealership shall only park vehicles OO designated paved surfaces. 14. The app shall obtain any required permits from the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District, Ramsey County and the State Cf Minnesota and meet the requirements of those agencies. 15. The site plan shall be rev k} move the driveway Om Beam Avenue the east 8s possible. This revision shall b8 subject to the approval Cf the city engineer. 16. The city engineer shall get the necessary approvals for vved@ s0 part 0f the public improvements needed for this aubdivisko report by DuWayne Konewko, Environmental Management S 17. All buildings, paving, unneeded utilities, etc. within pnDpO removed from the site by the applicants. 18. The ap shall provide all development 8Qre8m8 required bv the city. These agreements shall be exec| building permits. Seconded by Councilmember Cave A 1. Signing of the following agreements with th n itigation from the watershed district id development as stated in the subdivision shall be demolished and n8nce agreements and escrows �crows paid before the issuance of * A mai ntenance The project plans shall clearly point out the maintenance 8CCR3S nDUt8 to each garden, DODU and basin. The developer/owner of the property will be responsible for all such maintenance. A development agreement with the city for the construction of the public n]@d within the development will connect Beam Avenue to County Road D. ising the plat to rename all Outlot B with a lot and block number. 3. 2 4. The name shall dedicate any easements that the city may require for drainage and utility shall be subject to the approval of the city's public safety staff and city 5. The app shall pay the city escrow for any documents, easements and agreements that the city engineer may require that may not be ready by the time of plat signing. G. The app shall comply with the requirements in the Engineer Plan Rev dated November 21, 2006, by Erin Laberee and Michael Thompson. 7. The app shall also comply with the requirements listed in these plan-rev reports as * The Drainage and Wetland Report bv0UVVevn8Konevvko dated November 22,2OO6. 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 6 w The wet and rainwater garden landscaping comments bvGiODy Gaynor dated November 22. w The watershed district comments by Tina Carstens dated November 21, 2006. Ayes Seconded by Councilmember Cave Co uncilmember Rossbach moved to direct the applicant provide a three dimensional cad drawing of the building elevations for submission to the Design Review Board for their approval based won previous suciciestions by the board and city staff. Seconded by Councilmember Cave A RE SOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a resolution Cf the city council adopted the 27th day of November, 2OU8. fixed a date for 8 council hearing 0O the proposed public improvements for the CGdN8x/MOgF8DAddition Improvements, City Project 06 AND WHEREAS, ten nf the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on December 18 2006 and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1 . That it is necessary, cost-effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make public improvements to the proposed CarMax/Mogren Addition Improvements, City Project 06-17. improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in this council resolution adopted the 3. The city E prepare final plans and , 4. The finan implement the financing proposed financing plan Developer Asse! City of M8p|RwO Ramsey County MnDOT Total i@t8d engineer for this improvement and iS hereby directed b3 the making of said improvement. �exctoriS hereby authorized [o make the financial transfers necessary bo for the project. A proj budO8tof$4 The MSAS Bond Funds Seconded by Councilmember Cave A Comment from Councilmember Rossbach for the record: $ 3.394 [76.996) $ 517,550 (11.7%) $ 282.550 A5.0%\ Ayes Although the L8Odf0[Ol letter states otherwise, COUD[j|DleDlb8rR0S3b8Ch clarified that this site does and will generate traffic onto local streets. 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 9:35 p.m. Mayor Longrie announced GY0 minute recess. Councilmember Cave moved to adopt consent agenda item 1 and requested an itemized list for Kimley- Horn & Associates, Inc. Seconded bvCoUn[i|nlernb8rHedle Ayes-All Councilmember Cove moved to adopt consent agenda item 2 with the notified of any adiustments to the expenditure accounts. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All Seconded bvCounci|nember0elle Seconded bvC0UDCi|nl8[Dbe[ROSgb@Ch CoUmci|nlennb8rRossb8ch Seconded by Councilmember Cave dated 12/12/06 $ 428,261.09 Disbursements via debits to checking 8cCount dated 12/01/06 thru 12/07/06 18A 3 Fotal Accounts Payable 3 7RAND TOTAL stm8nts for Investments at council will be Approved the 2006 budget adjustments and authorized staff to increase expenditure budgets for investment management fees and interest on interfund loans when there is a corresponding increase in investment earnings. Conditional Use Permit Review — Sinclair Fuel Station (223 Larpenteur Avenue) Approved to review the conditional use permit for Sinclair Oil Corporation to operate amotor fuel station 8{223L8roenteur Avenue East again only U8 problem arises orif8 change Or expansion iSproposed. All original conditional use permit conditions 83 outlined iO the July O. 2002, city council meeting minutes apply. 12-18-0O City Council Meeting 8 4. Approve Purchase of Street Sweeper Approved to enter into a contract with MacQueen Equipment, Inc. under State Contract No. 435586, for the purchase of an Elgin Pelican Street Sweeper for the purchase price of $115,549 including sales tax and trade-in. 5. Approve Emergency Repair of Tandem Dump Truck Approved the repair of transmission at a cost of $9,820.57 to be paid to Interstate Power Systems by Fleet Superintendent Ed Nadeau. J. AWARD OF BIDS None I'll UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Conditional Use Permit Update - Woodhill a. Planner Roberts presented the L Councilmember Hjelle moved to bring this item back to Seconded by Councilmember Ju NEW BUSINESS 1. Easement Vacation - Jensen Esta U Councilmember Cave 06-12-158 vacation of the following: Hoyt January of 2007. n ue) 71 City staff, at the direction of the city council, initiated the That part of the easement on Lot 7, Block 1, Jensen Estates, according to the recorded thereof, In Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows: The easterly six feet of the 20-foot-wide drainage and utility easement that is along the west property line of the property at 2320 Hoyt Avenue (between Lots 6 and 7, Jensen Estates) between the north property line of the plat and the Hoyt Avenue right-of-way as shown on the recorded plat. All in Maplewood, Ramsey County, in Section 24, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On December 5, 2006, the planning commission held a public hearing about this proposed vacation. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the vacation. resented the Avenue, south of Linwo F- 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 9 2. OD December 18,2000 the city council reviewed this proposal. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, the public fee title interest in the property will gOtO the following described properties: 1 Lot 7. Block 1. Jensen Estates (232O Hoyt Avenue) (PIN 24-2S-22-22-0O77) NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described 1. U is in the public interest. 2. The city and the property owner do not need or use all of the existing easement for utility or trail purposes. 3. The two properties adjacent b3th 4. The remaining easement area will enough for the installation of the required This vacati is subeotnth8 property own at on the west side of their house on their property. Seconded by Councilmember Juenema 2. O8SOt0 Area Street I mprovements, Resolution Receiving Preliminary Repoi Resolution Authorizing Preparation of P a. City Engineer AN presented the report. Ju enemann moved to adopt the follov noUino for aoub|inhearina for ondav. Jan Avenue maintaining the drainage 06-16: ng Pub lic Hearing for January R.2007 nc8oOnS rA 11 RESOLUTION �2 ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT, CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted June 29th, 2006, a report has been prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, a consultant of the city engineering division, with reference to the improvement of the Desoto-Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06-16, by and this report was received by the council on December 1, 2006, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost- effective, and feasible, 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $5,597,500.00. 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 10 2. /\ public hearing shall be held OD such proposed improvement 0l the »m day Of January, 20U7iD the Council chambers Of Maplewood City Hall 8t7:OOp.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded bvCoUn[i|nn8rnb8rHe||8 Ayes-All 3. Gladstone Area Redevelopment, City Project O4-21--ReSO|utionAoprnvinQK88sterP|anand Authorization to Proceed with Phase 1 Project Analysis and Preliminary Report o. City Engineer /\h| presented the report. CoUnci|nlernb8rRosGb@Ch RESOLUTION 06-1 ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, it is proposed that improvements in the form of storm water improvements, turn lane improvements, sidewalk/trail improvements, utility improvements and power line burial improvements for Phase 1 for the Gladstone Area Redevelopment Project, City Project 04-21 be implemented, and that all or a portion of said improvement costs be assessed to the benefited property, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, WHEREAS, the Metropolitan amount of $1.8 million for the impro\i rded8grant I of the Glad of Maplewood in the /elopment, and That the proposed improvement project be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of an additional $290,000 are appropriated from future project expenses to prepare this feasibility report and to prepare preliminary project plans and analysis. by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All C0UDC|niembe[C@v8 from the plan: RESOLUTION 06-2-61 APPROVING MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, pursuant tO8 resolution Of the City Council dated December 13 the City Council entered into agreements with the firms CfHoisinoton-KDeg|8rGroup, Inc., Kjmlev-Horn and Associates, Inc., 8EH Inc., and Braun |nt8rt8C. Inc. for the purpose of preparing 8 Master Plan for the Redevelopment of the Gladstone Area of the City, and WHEREAS, the City Council has held hearings and review sessions on various drafts of the Master Plan on September 2O November 14 January 8.2OO6; April 18.2UUQ; June 20. 2006; October 26, 2UOG and November 13 . 2000tO review and debate the various sections and approaches t0 the redevelopment strategies and policies for the Gladstone Area Redevelopment, and 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 11 WHEREAS, the Master Plan has been presented by Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. in a final format that is recommended for adoption by the City Engineer, and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has awarded a grant to the City of Maplewood in the amount of $1.8 million for the improvement of Phase 1 of the Gladstone redevelopment, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That said Master Plan as prepared and presented by Hoisington-Koegler Group, Inc. is hereby adopted as the guiding principles and policies for the redevelopment of the Gladstone area. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-Mayor Longrie, Councilmembers Cave and Hjelle Nays-Council member Juenemann and Rossbach Councilmember Cave moved to continue the meeting until all agenda items were addressed. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-Mayor Longrie, Councilmembers Cave, Hjelle and Rossbach Nay-Councilmember Juenemann 4. City Private Street Policy a. Planner Roberts presented the report. Councilmember Cave moved to adODt the Dr000sed Private Street Policv for use in MaDlewoo • The city shall only allow private RESIDENTIAL within a planned unit development (PUD): TE STREET POLICY (December 18, 2006) The City of Maplewood recognizes that private streets may be necessary in certain instances to overcome obstacles for a new development. The city intends to use this policy for private driveways in new preliminary plats and planned unit developments. When the city determines that private streets are warranted, it is the intent of this policy that they utilize a public street system as a backbone and primary mode of access for the project. The city is not encouraging the use of or the construction of private streets or driveways, and the city has designed this policy to address the following issues: • Outline the cases in which the city should consider allowing private streets • Govern the streets. the city will apply to developments proposing the creation of additional private • Specify the design standards that a developer must meet when constructing a private street as well as Maplewood's inspection policies. • Describe the responsibility of the developer in notifying potential buyers of private streets within a development. 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 12 The city discourages the use Of private streets within new developments. The city may allow private streets in residential developments on a limited basis if the city finds the following conditions to exist: (1) The prevailing d8v8|Vpnl8n{ pattern makes itunfeasible or inappropriate to construct 8 public street. In making this determination, the city may consider the location of ex property lines, the shapes and diDlRDSiODS of property, the |0C8ti0O of existing h0no8S and Strg8tS, the p[0pOSgd |0C@ti0DS of structures, local Vrgeographic conditions and the existence 0f wetlands, creeks and streams. /2\ After reviewing the surrounding gnaa. the city concludes that an extension of the public street system is not required tO serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide g street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. (3) The use Of8 private street will permit enhanced protection Of vv8t8DdS. slopes, CRe8kS. StRe8DlS. treed and forested areas w Factors that the city shall consider in allowing private streets existing water bodies, streams and creeks, existing public str( w The city also may consider private private streets to help achieve the ity's nn8r environmental |y-SeO30vB :)pog raphy of the development site, i, preservation of wetlands, wooded property and other unique features. PU[> if the that there is 8 need for the naqo8|8[U the citv.��� Private The owner or homeowner's association shall maintain the private streets in good condition and shall have them plowed within 24 hours of a snowfall greater than two inches. The owner or developer shall file with Ramsey County covenants about the maintenance of the private street against all benefiting properties. The covenants or homeowner's association documents shall outline a finding mechanism for the long-term care and maintenance of all the private streets and driveways within the development. street standards. If the city allows a private street, it shall be subject to the following standards: the (1 ) (4) The developer or builder shall construc the private street with adequate drainage facilities to convey (3) Private streets that are not usable by emergency vehicles because of obstructions, snow accumulation, or poor maintenance are a public safety hazard. The city may remedy such conditions and assess the cost back to the property pursuant to M.S. § 429.1 subd. 1 (C). storm water runoff. All such designs, plans and calculations are subject to the approval of the city (5) The developer or contractor shall post street addresses or city approved street name signs, if required by city staff, at the where the private street intersects the public hgh .Th8city. also may require additional street and address signs within a development to help ensure public safety. (8) The project engineer shall desi the private street to minimize the impact upon ad parcels. The city may require rev ali SoeoifiobUi|dingohentotnn.ksr8erordiffepentaetb8ckSgnd landscaping to minimize the impact. The developer Or contractor shall complete and have city approval of an erosion control plan before starting construction. (7) The private Stn}8t must be |0C8tBd within 8 strip Of p[Op8hv at least 30 feet wide extending out to the public right-of-way 0r covered bv@30-hJ0t-wid8 easement that the developer O[ builder permanently records over all benefited and impacted parcels. 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 13 08\ Maintenance and repair Of utilities that are within the private street shall b8 the responsibility Ofthe b8n8hbnQ property. All utilities within private GLn8et8 8h8U be des and constructed to rne8i or exceed city standards. The following are the standards that the city will app/y to developments proposing the creation of additional private � The city sha not allow private streets if the street iS intended O[designed to interconnect ne O[ public StRe8bG. w function as driveways may be appropriate. w |n order to better accommodate snow storage 1n developments shall discourage direct driveway access and guest parking on private streets that function as a through street. 0 Buildings fronting 0l@ private street shall b8set back a DliOinOUm of22 feet from the curb. The maximum length of a private dead end street sha The developer nr contractor shall pos w The city shall discourage locati The minimum width for private streets as defined from back of curb to back of curb shall be as follows: Number of Potential Units Served Type of Street Minimum Width (Back to Back) 4 Units or less No curb and gutter 14 feet 5 to 24 Units* Concrete curb and gutter 24 feet ° w All phvate streets Al dead or turn nf the fire department an fire lanes shall be p constructed the current city cross-sectional design standards for the specified ; shall b8 desi 8DdCDnstrUc[edbJoitv8t8nd8ndSandbzrneetthene8dS blic safety department. City personnel may inspect the construction of private streets during the installation and construction to verify that the contractor uses the proper design, materials and construction techniques. The following are the responsibility of the developer in notifying Potential buyers of private streets within a � Private street si O8nle bksd8S shall be blue in lieu of the standard uUv street si oO|Or of green. In addition to the private street nann8, the name blade also Sh8U have the word "Private" k]C8t8d on it to � The Developer's Agreement shall stipulate that the developer shall inform potential buyers Of private streets located within the development in the marketing materials and in the closing documents. 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 14 Notwithstanding the ability of a development proposal to meet the criteria and standards the city included in this policy, the city council reserves the right to deny a request for private streets based on other factors where the city council determines that such denial is in the best interest of the city. Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All 5. Residential Wood Burning a. Fire Chief Lukin presented the report. Councilmember Rossbach moved to direct staff to explore options for regulating residential wood burning in the city. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-Councilmembers Juenemann and Rossbach Nays-Mayor Longrie and Councilmembers Cave and Hielle I iv, • I ki Lei I a :J V Ii[I NEST Update Councilmember Rossbach informed council the annw reduced and a total of 80,000 riders will have utilized Livable Communities Grant Mayor Longrie stated the Metropolitan Council award4 $8.8 million dollars to fund projects that promote mixE housing job services including transit. The City of Ma Star Tribune Article contribution to NEST has been 9 fixed route by the end of 2006. 2 3 I Z DI O. ADJC Mayor ten projects in seven cities a total of .use developments and help connect �wood received 1.8 million dollars. Regarding a recent Star Tribune article, Mayor Longrie asked citizens to "do the math" when they read the article to help put it all in perspective. RESENTATIONS anager Copeland and council wished everyone a Merry Christmas! MENT rie adjourned at 12:00 midnight. 12-18-06 City Council Meeting 15 Agenda Item H1 TO: Greg Copeland — City Manager FROM: Ch@rl8SAhl. Pubic Works Director/City Engineer Erin[aberee — /sSistGntCity Engineer SUBJECT: Desoto-Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06-16 a' Public Hearing 7:00 prn b' Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 votes) DATE: December 28th INTRODUCTION The public hearing for this project has been Soh8dU|Rd for 7:00 p.m., K8ond8y. January 8, 2007. NOUC8S Of the public hearing have been mailed and published. The feasibility study was provided to council at the December 18"',2O08 city council meeting. The study includes information on the proposed improvement, proposed financing and probable assessments. The city council will consider ordering the improvement following the public hearing. Background The city council ordered the preparation [f this feasibility study Ed the July 10"'.20O8 regular meeting. (}n December 18"',2008the city council accepted the feasibility report, ordered the public hearing and authorized preparation of plans and specifications. Street improvements for this neighborhood vxer8|ist8dOnUl9oitv'scapital improvements project plan. The project involves the CO[np|8te PSC0OStnJCUOn of approximately 3.2 [ni|eS of residential Stna8tS and affects 8ppn}xinn8Le|y 280 properties. The majority of streets in the project area are planned for complete r8t0nGinJ{tiVn 8G these streets do not have concrete curb 0r major Vii|itvvvork is planned requiring complete replacement of the curb. There are several streets with existing concrete curb that will only be partially reconstructed as the utility work is rnininn8|. Asidevv8|k is also being planned for construction 8|VnQ Desoto Street. The rainwater garden program and driveway replacement program will be continued for this project. Storm sewer improvements along with several sanitary sewer repairs are proposed. Saint Paul Regional Water Services has identified sections of water main Lo replace 8s part 0f this project. Two neighborhood meetings were held on November 2, 2006 and November 9, 2006 to discuss the proposed project with residents. Approximately 150 residents representing 60 properties throughout the proposed project 8[8G8ttRDdmdth8QD8RtiOgS. Given the feedback from the neighborhood meetings and other telephone and e-mail inquiries that we have received since then, property owners are generally accepting Vf the proposed improvements to the neighborhood streets. The proposed project schedule anticipates construction beginning as early as May 2007 and completion of the project in November of 2007. Awork session will be held on January 8 th .200at 5:00pmtodiscuss various aspects of the city's street reconstruction program and associated financing. The city's 5 year capitol improvement plan and the street rating program will also b8 discussed 8s part Of the work session. The purpose of the session will betO better understand the process that is used to determine which streets to improve and how b]dVSOin8 cost effective nl8nDe[ Agenda Item H1 Budget Impact The resolution calls for establishing a project budget of $5,597,500. The financing plan is outlined specifically in the feasibility study and calls for funding from eight sources: Assessments, Municipal State Aid (MSA), Sanitary Sewer Fund, Saint Paul Regional Water Services ( SPRWS), Environmental Utility Fund (EUF), WAC Fund and Driveway Replacement Income. The funding breakdown is noted in Table 1. Table 9: Desoto - Skillman Area Street Improvements project funding breakdown The project budget, as identified in the feasibility study, is $1,027,500 over the total project cost estimated in the CIP. Construction costs have increased significantly since estimating the project costs for the CIP which is the reason for the increase. The majority of the additional cost will be funded through MSA funds for the reconstruction of Desoto Street and Skillman Avenue which are state aid routes. The GO Debt Service will need to be increased by $319,800 from the CIP to fund the project. Staff is confident that the cost estimates are conservative and that actual costs may be lower when bids are opened. It is recommended that the entire project proceed to receipt of bids with alternatives to delay portions of the project if expenses increase dramatically above that authorized in the project CIP planning stage. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the improvement of the Desoto- Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06 -16. Attachments: 1. Resolution Ordering Improvement After Public Hearing 2. Location Map CIP Funding Feasibility Funding % Increases from CIP GO Debt Service $ 1,026,200.00 $ 1,346,000.00 24% $ 319,800.00 MSA $ 1,144,900.00 $ 1,597,100.00 29% $ 452,200.00 Assessments $ 1,662,000.00 $ 1,836,000.00 33% $ 174,000.00 Sanitary Sewer Fund $ 233,700.00 $ 239,400.00 4% $ 5,700.00 SPRWS $ 131,200.00 $ 147,000.00 3% $ 15,800.00 Environmental Utility Fund $ 292,000.00 $ 292,000.00 5% $ - WAC Fund $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 1% $ - Driveways $ 60,000.00 1% $ 60,000.00 Total $ 4,570,000.00 $ 5,597,500.00 1 100% $ 1,027,500.00 Table 9: Desoto - Skillman Area Street Improvements project funding breakdown The project budget, as identified in the feasibility study, is $1,027,500 over the total project cost estimated in the CIP. Construction costs have increased significantly since estimating the project costs for the CIP which is the reason for the increase. The majority of the additional cost will be funded through MSA funds for the reconstruction of Desoto Street and Skillman Avenue which are state aid routes. The GO Debt Service will need to be increased by $319,800 from the CIP to fund the project. Staff is confident that the cost estimates are conservative and that actual costs may be lower when bids are opened. It is recommended that the entire project proceed to receipt of bids with alternatives to delay portions of the project if expenses increase dramatically above that authorized in the project CIP planning stage. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the improvement of the Desoto- Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06 -16. Attachments: 1. Resolution Ordering Improvement After Public Hearing 2. Location Map RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, G resolution Vf the city council adopted the 18th day of December, 20O8 fixed 8date for a council hearing on the proposed street improvements for the Desoto-Skillman Area Street Improvements, City Project 06-16. AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on January 8Lh.20UY, and the council has heard all persons desiring [0be heard On the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL DF MAPLEVVO{}D, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That itiGnecessary, and feasible, Gs detailed in the feasibility report, that the City ofMaplewood make improvements to Desoto-Skillman Area Street |nnprov8n0enbu City Project 08-16. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered 88 proposed in the council resolution adopted the 8th day of January 2007. 3. The city engineer is designated 9ngin98rf0rLhiSinnprVv8nn8nL8ndisherHbvdir8ctedto prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project bUdoetOf$5.5S7.500ShGUb8eSt@b|iShed. The proposed financing plan iS8sfollows: Financing Plan for Desoto Skillman Street lmprovments GO Debt Service $ 1,346,000.00 24% Assessments $ 1,836,000.00 33% Sanitary Sewer Fund $ 239,400.00 4% SPRWS $ 147,000.00 3% Environmental Utility Fund $ 292,000.00 5% Driveways $ 60,000.00 1% I Total $ 5,597,500.00 100% O < L 1 0 Cn Cf') Cn J GO < Cf) n Cf � cn ry q V E. ELD RIDGE ]EL D M e h , r1ine Cn u� Cf) �7 0 C < BELMONT 0 - LN. F _� X/ Lake _J cn SKILLMAN AVE. SKILL 'n AV E. BEL CIO Cf) U AVE. F O < c) y >- Z- LLJ 0 < ry ry M C/-) GATEWAY M SUMMER :D < MT VERNON M n AVE AVE. w Cn LLJ L'J RIPLEY Cn _J < 0 0 0 1 TOENJES _�­ Roselawn Edgerton Park >_ LJ_J n, < Ca n Western 7 - PL. < M ry RIP LEY < PL ZV- Park AVE. bi ry 0 Z � : ;7 III 7; - Li V Lu A 0 AVE BELLWOd AV E. BEL LVVUUU I Cn I— A 0 C/-) GATEWAY M SUMMER E. SUMMER LN. LJ_J ry CT. Lj J RIPLEY Cn 4,v SU MER D — u CD z Western 7 - PL. < M ry RIP LEY > K I N GSTO N < AVE. Hills 0 bi 35E � _ l NO SCALE Proposed Capital Improvement Plan for 2007 Desoto-Skillman Area Street Improvements City Project 06-16 0 Cn I Cn I— A >_ III C/-) GATEWAY Cn Cf) J RIPLEY AVE. 4,v Cn '5 CD z n < ry M Cn > K I N GSTO N < AVE. bi ry 0 Z � : ;7 III 7; - Li V Lu PRICE z AVE. n n H P < w AVE n 35E � _ l NO SCALE Proposed Capital Improvement Plan for 2007 Desoto-Skillman Area Street Improvements City Project 06-16 0 AGENDA NO. 1 -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: January 8, 2007 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 235,207.13 Checks # 71576 thru # 71633 dated 12/19/06 $ 105,311.17 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 12/08/06 thru 12/14/06 $ 132,775.55 Checks # 71634 thru # 71701 dated 12/26/06 $ 274,144.82 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 12/15106 thru 12/21/06 $ 325,923.99 Checks # 71702 thru # 71750 dated 12/27/06 thru 01/02/06 $ 94,745.94 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 12/22/06 thru 12/28/06 $ 1,168,108.60 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $ 482,71132 Payroll Cheeks and Direct Deposits dated 12/15/06 $ 2,963.93 Payroll Deduction check # 1000732 thru # 1000734 dated 12/15/06 $ 463,360.34 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 12/29/06 $ 513.16 Payroll Deduction check # 1000864 thru # 1000865 dated XX /XX /XX $ 949,548.75 Total Payroll $ 2,117,65735 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651- 249 -2903 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. ds attachments S \CTY_CLRK\Agenda Lists and Reports 2007\Agenda Reports\01 -08-07111 Approval of Claims.xls Check Register City of Maplewood 1211812006 Check 71576 71577 71578 71579 71580 71581 71582 71583 71584 71585 71586 71587 71588 71589 71590 71591 71592 71593 71594 71595 71596 71597 71598 71599 71600 71601 71602 71603 71604 71605 .E. • if• • i1• • 11• + 11• • i1• • 11• • 11• + 11• • i1• • 11• • 11• WA r . i •i r r r • r i :f• r � r 1 if••i i1 11 r � r � r � r � r � r � if r r 1 r �• 11• i1• 1 i r �• r r ERICKSON OIL PRODUCTS INC NICK FRANZEN GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL CITY OF ST PAUL CITY OF ST PAUL XCELENERGY XCELENERGY XCELENERGY XCELENERGY XCELENERGY XCELENERGY AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES NCR INC DEPT OF AGRICULTURE CRAIG AICHELE ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC APPEARANCE PLUS CAR WASH JAMES BEHAN BERBEE INFORMATION NETWORKS CHAD BERGO BETHEL & ASSOCIATES, PA BLUE CROSS REFUNDS BP/AMOCO OIL COMPANY C R FELTON & ASSOCIATES C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES CHILDREN HOME & FAMILY SERVICE CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. DGM INC. FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING INC ANTHONY GABRIEL GAMETIME CAROLE GERNES GYM WORKS INC HLB TAUTGES REDPATH, LTD IDEACOM MID - AMERICA INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS INC KNAAK & KANTRUD PA KNAAK & KANTRUD PA LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ALISHA LUKIN STEVE LUKIN M A TAYLOR INC MEHA MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION Description CAR WASHES - NOV REIMS INTERNET, CELL, MILEAGE 10118 - NET BILLABLE TICKETS - NOV RECORD MGMT SOFTWARE FEES - DRIVING SCHOOL FOR 13 OFFICERS GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY WINTER SAND PESTICIDE APPLICATOR LICENSE REIMS FOR TOOL ALLOWANCE PATROL & BOARDING FEES 11!20 - 1213 CAR WASHES - NOV REIMB FOR MILEAGE 7112 - 12/11 AIR- WLC4402 -25 -K9 REIMB HR SERVICES 11 /29 - 1 211 3 REF BCBS - AMB 06013750 FUEL APPRAISAL OF MISC ITEM - CN APPLICANT BACKGROUND CHECKS YOUTH DIVERSION FROG - NOV MH STRUCTURE FOR STORM SEWER TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLES TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE TOW VEHICLE PROJ 03 -39 HAZELWOOD ST - FINAL REIMB FOR UNIFORM ALLOW PLAYGROUND EQUIP REIMB FOR MILEAGE 1119 -10/25 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE - NOV 2006 AUDIT - PROGRESS BILLING REPLACEMENT HEADSET OVERHAUL OF TRANSMISSION ASY LEGAL SERVICES - NOV PROSECUTION SERVICES - NOV MCSC MEMBERSHIP REIMB FOR MILEAGE 10/30-11/21 REIMB FOR FIRE EXT & LUNCH FITNESS CONSULTANT FEE - 4TH QTR WINTER CONFERENCE ESCROW RELEASE - 2325 OLIVIA CT E ESCROW RELEASE - 2327 OLIVIA CT Amount 76.68 118.99 512.15 3,798.00 650.00 11,790.42 8,199.00 4,185.53 756.64 332.50 143.39 1,71 1.77 10.00 375.00 838.50 86.80 68.08 20,178.04 680.92 10,658.00 65.17 31.02 142.50 50.00 3,526.08 511.20 135.26 122.48 122.48 111.83 111.83 106.50 90.53 90.53 90.53 90.53 90.53 90.53 90.53 90.53 53.25 25,142.47 31.33 516.90 156.15 1,665.66 2,773.00 87.46 9,634.47 8,250.00 8,250.00 1,250.00 46.90 103.32 1,735.00 35.00 1,265.45 1,265.45 4 Check Register City of Maplewood 1211812006 Check 71612 71613 71614 71615 71616 71617 71618 71619 71620 71621 71622 71623 71624 71625 71626 71627 71628 71629 71630 71631 71632 71633 • 11• • if• + 11• • i1• • if• • i1• rr if11 r � r •• r r •• 1 '• i r •• r r •• r i i MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MINNESOTA PERFORM DANCE MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN MN COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSN NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RAMSEY COUNTY -VITAL RECORDS RICK JOHNSON DEER & BEAVER INC SAM'S CLUB DIRECT SAM'S CLUB DIRECT SISTER ROSALIND GEFRE SOUTHLAND BUILDERS SOUTHLAND BUILDERS SOUTHLAND BUILDERS SOUTHLAND BUILDERS SOUTHLAND BUILDERS SOUTHLAND BUILDERS SOUTHLAND BUILDERS SOUTHLAND BUILDERS SOUTHLAND BUILDERS SOUTHLAND BUILDERS STATE OF MINNESOTA T R F SUPPLY CO. T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC T.R. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC WILLIAM P. WALSH 58 Checks in this report. Description ESCROW RELEASE - 2317 OLIVIA CT ESCROW RELEASE - 2313 OLIVIA CT ESCROW RELEASE - 2315 OLIVIA CT ESCROW RELEASE - 2319 OLIVIA CT ESCROW RELEASE - 2329 OLIVIA CT ESCROW RELEASE - 2331 OLIVIA CT ESCROW RELEASE - 2321 OLIVIA CT ESCROW RELEASE - 2323 OLIVIA CT MONTHLY SAC - NOV THEATER RENTAL 11127 - 1213 TRAINING DRUG & DWI FORFEITURE FORMS SIGN BLANKS REF J CASKEY PROJ #75 -16A REFUND C BUCHANAN - MEMBERSHIP REFUND A HAGEN - MEMBERSHIP PROD 05 -16 F GUIDO - REIMB FOR REFUND ELDER -JONER PERMIT BL -06- REFUND G BARENZ PARTIAL TRAINING NOTARY RECORDING FEE DEER REMOVAL - NOV PROGRAM SUPPLIES PROGRAM SUPPLIES MCC MASSAGES - NOV ESCROW RELEASE - 1548 LEGACY ESCROW RELEASE -1552 LEGACY ESCROW RELEASE -1553 LEGACY ESCROW RELEASE - 1549 LEGACY ESCROW RELEASE - 1551 LEGACY ESCROW RELEASE - 3036 COTTAGE LN ESCROW RELEASE - 3012 COTTAGE LN ESCROW RELEASE - 3020 COTTAGE LN ESCROW RELEASE - 3010 COTTAGE LN ESCROW RELEASE - 3016 HAZELWOOD RAMSEY COURT CITATIONS 1111105 - TOWELS PROD 02 -08 CO RD D - PMT #12 VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIAL LICENSING MODULE - LICENSE FEES TAX COMMERCIAL PLUMBING - FINAL BILL Amount 1,261.13 1,261.13 1,261.13 1,261.13 1,250.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 21,483.00 8,602.20 55.00 116.09 652.85 666.44 312.00 306.72 131.46 80.50 55.00 50.00 100.00 400.00 192.19 144.03 1,935.00 1,010.55 1,005.48 1,005.48 1,005.48 1,005.48 1,005.29 1,004.93 1,004.93 1,004.93 1,004.93 2,261.93 236.43 23,496.47 519.68 17,482.00 1,136.33 1,497.00 235.207.13 3 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee Description 12/07/06 12/08/06 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 12/07/06 12/08/06 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 12/08/06 12/11/06 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 12/11/06 12/12/06 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 12/12/06 12/13/06 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 12/08/06 12113/06 US Bank VISA One Card* Purchasing card items 12/13/06 12/14/06 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar TOTAL *Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached. Amount 11 iVV�aJi II/ 11 Visa Transactions 12 -25 -06 to 12 -8 -06 Trans Date 12/712006 12/l/2006 1112412006 11/27/2006 1112812006 1112812006 11124/2006 11/28/2006 12/l/2006 12/l/2006 12/5/2006 12/5/2006 12/5/2006 10/31/2006 1116/2006 11/20/2006 11/24/2006 11/28/2006 11/30/2006 11/30/2006 12/l/2006 12/l/2006 1214/2006 1215/2006 12/5/2006 12/6/2006 12/6/2006 12/4/2006 12/6/2006 11/29/2006 11/29/2006 11/28/2006 11/27/2006 11/27/2006 11/27/2006 11/30/2006 12/4/2006 11/30/2006 11/29/2006 11/29/2006 11/30/2006 11/30/2006 11/13/2006 11/27/2006 11/28/2006 11/28/2006 1215/2006 1216/2006 12/6/2006 12/7/2006 12/7/2006 11/22/2006 12/l/2006 12/3/2006 1214/2006 11/29/2006 11/30/2006 12/l/2006 12/l/2006 11/27/2006 11/28/2006 11/30/2006 12/l/2006 1216/2006 12/6/2006 12/3/2006 12/3/2006 11/29/2006 11/30/2006 11/30/2006 11/30/2006 11/30/2006 sting Date Merchant Name 12!812006 VZW APO CCVISIONNO 12!412006 RAGAN COMMUNICATIONS INC 1112712006 KOHL'S 0577 1112812006 AMZ*AMAZON PAYMENTS 11/29/2006 CUB FOODS, INC. 11/29/2006 AMAZON.COM 1112712006 PERFORMANCE TRANSMI 1113012006 SHRED -IT 12/4/2006 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 12/4/2006 TOUSLEY FORD 127228006 12/6/2006 ACCURINT EOM AUTO P 12/6/2006 GRAFIX SHOPPE 12/6/2006 JACK NADEL INTERNATIONAL 12/8/2006 NUCO2 01 OF 01 12/8/2006 NUCO2 01 OF 01 12/8/2006 NUCO2 01 OF 01 12/8/2006 NUCO2 01 OF 01 12/8/2006 NUCO2 01 OF 01 12/1/2006 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE 12/1/2006 PRECOR 12/4/2006 CYBEX - 01 12/8/2006 NUCO2 01 OF 01 12/6/2006 AQUA LOGIC INC 12/6/2006 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE 12/8/2006 NUCO2 01 OF 01 12/8/2006 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 12/8/2006 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 12/5/2006 THINK ALL 12/7/2006 THINK ALL 12/1/2006 MICHAELS #9401 12/1/2006 GREEN EARTH OFFICE SUPPL 11/30/2006 SPRINT -STORE #2430 11/29/2006 A -1 HYDRAULICS 11/28/2006 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617 11/28/2006 FACTORY CARD OUTLET #284 12/1/2006 DUNE TEMPORARY TATTOOS IN 12/6/2006 TIGER OAKS PUBLICATION 12/1/2006 THE STAR TRIBUNE- CIRCULAT 11/30/2006 FRATTALLONE'S ACE HDWE 11/30/2006 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT 12/1/2006 REGAL AUTO WASH XX -M 12/1/2006 REGAL AUTO WASH XX -M 12/1/2006 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC 11/28/2006 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 11/29/2006 CINTAS FIRST AID #431 11/30/2006 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 12/6/2006 FERGUSON ENT #1657 12/7/2006 WMS'WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY 12/7/2006 WMS`WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY 12/8/2006 RADIOSHACK COR00161455 12/8/2006 LESCO SC 0530 11/28/2006 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY HA 12/4/2006 BEST BUY MHT 00000109 12/4/2006 GOVDOCS.COM, INC. 12/5/2006 AT &T ARBOR /ESB 11/30/2006 HP DIRECT- PUBLICSECTOR 12/4/2006 BERBEE INFORMATION NETWRK 12/4/2006 HP DIRECT- PUBLICSECTOR 12/4/2006 HP DIRECT- PUBLICSECTOR 11/29/2006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 11/30/2006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 12/1/2006 CUB FOODS, INC. 12/4/2006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 12/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 12/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 12/4/2006 KNOWLANS #2 12/4/2006 U OF M CCE ON LINE 11/30/2006 PETSMART 00004614 12/1/2006 CLOVER SUPER FOODS 12/1/2006 CLOVER SUPER FOODS 12/1/2006 CLOVER SUPER FOODS 12/4/2006 BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKLE Trans Amount Name $44.09 R CHARLES AHL $121.34 BRUCE K ANDERSON $21.29 MANDY ANZALDI $27.58 MANDY ANZALDI 515.20 MANDY ANZALDI 571.25 MANDY ANZALDI $1,651.45 JOHN BANICK $124.21 JOHN BANICK $4,760.95 JOHN BANICK $2,797.58 JOHN BANICK $30.00 JOHN BANICK $159.75 JOHN BANICK $1,247.31 JOHN BANICK 551.33 JIM BEHAN $83.92 JIM BEHAN $87.33 JIM BEHAN $87.33 JIM BEHAN $87.33 JIM BEHAN $40.42 JIM BEHAN $59.37 JIM BEHAN 592.70 JIM BEHAN 558.06 JIM BEHAN $1,101.77 JIM BEHAN $16.90 JIM BEHAN $87.33 JIM BEHAN $535.99 JIM BEHAN $535.99 JIM BEHAN $1.96 CHAD BERGO $1.00 CHAD BERGO 534.15 OAKLEY BIESANZ $262.65 OAKLEY BIESANZ $21.39 RON BOURQUIN $29.85 TROY BRINK $111.83 HEIDI CAREY $9.43 HEIDI CAREY ($88.50) HEIDI CAREY $192.50 HEIDI CAREY 556.29 LINDA CROSSON $1.91 CHARLES DEAVER $88.38 DAVE EDSON $24.48 ANDREW ENGSTROM $24.48 ANDREW ENGSTROM $16.42 LARRY FARR $640.00 LARRY FARR 574.98 LARRY FARR $192.21 LARRY FARR $12.30 LARRY FARR $350.37 LARRY FARR $350.37 LARRY FARR $18.06 LARRY FARR $223.65 LARRY FARR $865.00 MYCHAL FOWLDS 521.29 MYCHAL FOWLDS $410.00 MYCHAL FOWLDS $1,013.60 MYCHAL FOWLDS $1,513.08 NICK FRANZEN $534.27 NICK FRANZEN $292.88 NICK FRANZEN $87.33 NICK FRANZEN ($15.33) PATRICIA FRY $9.38 PATRICIA FRY 553.60 PATRICIA FRY $7.85 PATRICIA FRY ($7.85) PATRICIA FRY $37.54 PATRICIA FRY $11.54 VIRGINIA GAYNOR $150.00 CLARENCE GERVAIS $21.29 MIKE GRAF $151.14 MIKE GRAF $307.67 MIKE GRAF $52.04 MIKE GRAF $8.30 JANET M GREW HAYMAN Visa Transactions 12 -25 -06 to 12 -8 -06 Trans Date Posting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 1112712006 1112912006 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $66.35 KAREN E GUILFOILE 12/612006 12!712006 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER $88.05 MARK HAAG 12!612006 12!812006 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $27.54 MARK HAAG 12!712006 12!812006 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $5.59 MARK HAAG 1112812006 11/3012006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 540.15 LORI HANSON 1112812006 11/3012006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 534.50 LORI HANSON 11130/2006 121412006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $16.27 LORI HANSON 1214/2006 121512006 TECHNAGRAPHICS $1,324.86 LORI HANSON 11/22/2006 11127/2006 MENARDS 3059 $8.41 PATRICK HEFFERNAN 1211/2006 12/4/2006 DE LADE LANDEN OP01 OF 01 $206.61 ANN E HUTCHINSON 12/6/2006 12/8/2006 BARNES & NOBLE #2227 $16.99 ANN E HUTCHINSON 11/26/2006 11/28/2006 CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03 $15.30 SCOTT JACOBSON 11/29/2006 12/4/2006 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $667.12 DAVID JAHN 11/28/2006 11/29/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS # 28438 $198.43 DON JONES 11/28/2006 11/29/2006 MENARDS 3059 $3.39 DON JONES 11/28/2006 11/30/2006 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $68.94 DON JONES 11/29/2006 12/1/2006 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $106.50 DON JONES 11/30/2006 12/4/2006 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $36.38 DON JONES 11/30/2006 12/1/2006 MENARDS 3017 $12.81 TOM KALKA 11/30/2006 12/1/2006 MENARDS 3059 $55.52 TOM KALKA 11/24/2006 11/27/2006 CUB FOODS, INC. $15.76 FLINT KARTS 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 VZW APO CCVISIONNO 566.20 DUWAYNE KONEWKO 12/6/2006 12/7/2006 SONYSTYLE DIRECT $79.82 DAVID KVAM 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 ECI *GOTOMYPC.COM SVCS $19.95 ERIN M LABEREE 11/30/2006 12/1/2006 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT $52.14 DENNIS LINDORFF 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 MENARDS 3059 $34.93 DENNIS LINDORFF 12/6/2006 12/8/2006 MILLS FLEET FARM #27 $52.04 DENNIS LINDORFF 11/28/2006 11/29/2006 METRO SALES INC $301.55 STEVE LUKIN 11/28/2006 11/29/2006 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT $232.44 STEVE LUKIN 11/28/2006 11/29/2006 MAPLEWOOD PARKS AND RECRE $600.00 STEVE LUKIN 11/29/2006 12/1/2006 EAT INC $26.63 STEVE LUKIN 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL $892.97 STEVE LUKIN 12/1/2006 12/5/2006 ASPEN MILLS 8005717343 $36.87 STEVE LUKIN 12/5/2006 12/6/2006 WMS *WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY $267.91 STEVE LUKIN 12/6/2006 12/7/2006 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL $279.33 STEVE LUKIN 12/6/2006 12/7/2006 METRO FIRE $36.81 STEVE LUKIN 12/6/2006 12/7/2006 METRO FIRE $112.50 STEVE LUKIN 12/6/2006 12/8/2006 MAPLEWOOD CARBONES 571.50 STEVE LUKIN 11/30/2006 12/4/2006 MARATHON OIL 035212Q96 $20.00 GORDON MALLORY 11/22/2006 11/27/2006 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE $160.52 MARK MARUSKA 12/4/2006 12/5/2006 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $271.31 MARK MARUSKA 11/27/2006 11/29/2006 OFFICE MAX 00002204 $166.65 ED NADEAU 11/28/2006 11/29/2006 METROCALL ARCH WIRE $37.31 ED NADEAU 12/6/2006 12/8/2006 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $5.05 ED NADEAU 11/28/2006 11/29/2006 CINTAS FIRST AID #431 554.91 BRYAN NAGEL 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 SUNRAY TRUE VALUE $141.18 JOHN NAUGHTON 11/27/2006 11/28/2006 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $24.13 JEAN NELSON 11/27/2006 11/28/2006 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $3.37 JEAN NELSON 11/28/2006 11/30/2006 OFFICE MAX 00002204 $19.16 AMY NIVEN 11/28/2006 11/29/2006 CONTINENTAL SAFETY $294.43 RICHARD NORDQUIST 11/28/2006 11/30/2006 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $9.24 RICHARD NORDQUIST 11/27/2006 11/29/2006 TWIN CITY SEED COMPANY $137.39 ERICK OSWALD 11/28/2006 11/30/2006 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $6.79 ERICK OSWALD 11/30/2006 12/1/2006 QWEST *INTERPRISE $690.00 MARSHA PACOLT 12/1/2006 12 /4 /2006QWESTCOMM *TN651 $15.79 MARSHA PACOLT 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 CUSTOM HEADSETS INC $222.48 MARSHA PACOLT 11/29/2006 12/1/2006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $13.82 MARY KAY PALANK 12/4/2006 12/5/2006 TARGET 00011858 $4.62 MARY KAY PALANK 12/4/2006 12/5/2006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $199.08 MARY KAY PALANK 12/2/2006 12/4/2006 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $23.94 ROBERT PETERSON 12/6/2006 12/8/2006 EAT INC $8.75 ROBERT PETERSON 11/22/2006 11/27/2006 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC $374.14 PHILIP F POWELL 11/27/2006 11/29/2006 WOLF CAMERA #1530 $8.30 PHILIP F POWELL 11/29/2006 11/30/2006 MEDCO SUPPLY $150.22 PHILIP F POWELL 11/29/2006 11/30/2006 IMS PLUS $258.65 PHILIP F POWELL 11/29/2006 11/30/2006 NAPA AUTO PARTS # 28438 $6.81 PHILIP F POWELL 11/29/2006 12/1/2006 WOLF CAMERA #1530 $7.66 PHILIP F POWELL 11/30/2006 12/1/2006 RADIOSHACK COR00161455 $32.44 PHILIP F POWELL 11/30/2006 12/1/2006 BATTERIES PLUS 525.05 PHILIP F POWELL 11/30/2006 12/1/2006 ABACUS PLUS SERVICES INC $469.67 PHILIP F POWELL 11/30/2006 12/4/2006 PORTERS CAMERA STORE $164.95 PHILIP F POWELL 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 RIVER PAST CORPORATION $29.95 PHILIP F POWELL Visa Transactions 12 -25 -06 to 12 -8 -06 Trans Date Posting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 12/412006 12!612006 WOLF CAMERA #1530 $8.30 PHILIP F POWELL 12/412006 12!712006 TAPE $150.00 PHILIP F POWELL 12!512006 12!612006 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $7.97 PHILIP F POWELL 12!512006 12!612006 IMS PLUS $90.21 PHILIP F POWELL 1112412006 11/2712006 BATTERIES PLUS 520.22 ROBERT PRECHTEL 121112006 121412006 GE CAPITAL $331.22 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 1213!2006 121412006 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS $357.50 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 1112312006 1112712006 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19 $119.75 STEVEN PRIEM 1112712006 1112812006 PIRTCK MIDWAY $275.29 STEVEN PRIEM 1112812006 1112912006 ZIEGLER INC - RETAIL $7.17 STEVEN PRIEM 11/28/2006 1112912006 ZIEGLER INC - RETAIL $82.92 STEVEN PRIEM 11128/2006 1113012006 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $78.28 STEVEN PRIEM 11/29/2006 11130/2006 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY $479.54 STEVEN PRIEM 11/29/2006 12/1/2006 CATCO PARTS &SERVICE 545.88 STEVEN PRIEM 11/30/2006 12/4/2006 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $3.32 STEVEN PRIEM 11/30/2006 12/4/2006 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $42.73 STEVEN PRIEM 11/30/2006 12!412006 WHITE BEAR DODGE INC $9.59 STEVEN PRIEM 12/1/2006 12!412006 MERIT CHEVROLET CO. $40.10 STEVEN PRIEM 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $5.10 STEVEN PRIEM 12!1/2006 12/4/2006 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039 $62.80 STEVEN PRIEM 1214/2006 12/6/2006 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039 $184.31 STEVEN PRIEM 1214/2006 12/6/2006 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039 $5.59 STEVEN PRIEM 1215/2006 12/6/2006 SOI *SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL $1,123.74 STEVEN PRIEM 1215/2006 12/6/2006 PAM OIL INC $70.35 STEVEN PRIEM 1215/2006 12/7/2006 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $43.82 STEVEN PRIEM 1215/2006 12/7/2006 BAUER BULT TRE33200023 $415.18 STEVEN PRIEM 12/6/2006 12/8/2006 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS $705.46 STEVEN PRIEM 12/6/2006 12/8/2006 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $50.43 STEVEN PRIEM 1216/2006 12/8/2006 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $133.01 STEVEN PRIEM 1216/2006 12/7/2006 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS $1,834.97 KEVIN RABBETT 11/27/2006 11/28/2006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $9.65 TERRIE RAMEAUX 11/28/2006 11/29/2006 NOVACARE REHB /HEALT $90.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX 11/30/2006 12!112006 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS $104.20 MICHAEL REILLY 11/30/2006 12!112006 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS $1,929.62 MICHAEL REILLY 12!1/2006 12/4/2006 HISTORY THEATRE $305.00 AUDRA ROBBINS 12!5/2006 12/6/2006 TARGET 00011858 $15.98 AUDRA ROBBINS 1217/2006 12/8/2006 ORDWAY CNTR - TICKET & DEV $161.00 AUDRA ROBBINS 11/28/2006 11/29/2006 MENARDS 3059 561.74 ROBERT RUNNING 11/28/2006 11/30/2006 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $87.85 ROBERT RUNNING 11/29/2006 11/30/2006 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY $165.08 ROBERT RUNNING 11/29/2006 12/1/2006 ROOT RIVER HARDWOODS $999.99 ROBERT RUNNING 11/29/2006 12/1/2006 ROOT RIVER HARDWOODS $199.20 ROBERT RUNNING 12/6/2006 12/7/2006 FASTENAL CO MO TO $43.68 ROBERT RUNNING 12/4/2006 12/6/2006 THE UPS STORE #2171 $12.47 HARRIET J RYDEL 1215/2006 12/7/2006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 579.98 HARRIET J RYDEL 1216/2006 12/8/2006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 547.89 HARRIET J RYDEL 11/22/2006 11/27/2006 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $580.00 DEB SCHMIDT 11/22/2006 11/27/2006 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $1,155.00 DEB SCHMIDT 11/22/2006 11/2712006 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $1,355.00 DEB SCHMIDT 11/22/2006 11/2712006 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $110.00 DEB SCHMIDT 11/28/2006 11/30/2006 SHRED -IT $61.00 DEB SCHMIDT 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 T- MOBILE $45.01 SCOTT SCHULTZ 11/24/2006 11/27/2006 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $354.50 MICHAEL SHORTREED 11/30/2006 12/1/2006 MINNESOTAS BOOKSTORE $214.00 MICHAEL SHORTREED 1211/2006 12/4/2006 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $14.93 MICHAEL SHORTREED 1211/2006 12/4/2006 DONUT HUT OAKDALE $9.95 MICHAEL SHORTREED 11/29/2006 12/1/2006 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $132.90 ANDREA SINDT 1211/2006 12/4/2006 U OF M CCE ON LINE $100.00 ANDREA SINDT 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 T- MOBILE iVR PAYMENT $41.79 ANDREA SINDT 12/2/2006 12/4/2006 SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL $200.00 ANDREA SINDT 12/2/2006 12/4/2006 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS $424.04 ANDREA SINDT 11/29/2006 12/1/2006 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 531.20 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 11/24/2006 11/27/2006 RED WING SHOE STORE $144.50 RONALD SVENDSEN 11/27/2006 11/29/2006 ENGRAPHICS, INC $110.23 LYLE SWANSON 11/28/2006 11/29/2006 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY GOLDEN V $31.96 LYLE SWANSON 11/29/2006 12/1/2006 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $77.62 LYLE SWANSON 11/30/2006 12/1/2006 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER $222.78 LYLE SWANSON 11/30/2006 12/1/2006 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $138.64 LYLE SWANSON 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY GOLDEN V $105.23 LYLE SWANSON 12/1/2006 12/4/2006 WALGREEN 00016873 $9.52 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN 1211/2006 12/4/2006 T- MOBILE $85.56 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN 1212/2006 12/4/2006 THE HOME DEPOT 2804 $9.46 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN Visa Transactions 12 -25 -06 to 12 -8 -06 Trans Date Posting Date Merchant Name 12/612006 12!812006 STREAMLINE DESIGN INC 12/212006 12!412006 FSH COMMUNICATION01 OF 01 12!712006 12!812006 QWESTCOMM'TN612 12!712006 12!812006 QWESTCOMM'TN612 121712006 121812006 QWESTCOMM`TN612 121712006 121812006 QWESTCOMM`TN612 1217!2006 121812006 QWESTCOMMWTN612 121712006 121812006 QWESTCOMMWTN612 121712006 12/812006 QWESTCOMM*TN612 12/7/2006 12/8/2006 QWESTCOMM*TN612 12/7/2006 12/8/2006 QWESTCOMM *TN612 12/7/2006 12/8/2006 QWESTCOMM *TN612 1112812006 11/30/2006 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT 12/612006 12/7/2006 INT'L ASSN OF CHIEFS OF P 1214/2006 12/6/2006 OFFICE MAX 00002204 11/28/2006 11/30/2006 TARGET 00022004 11/28/2006 11/30/2006 OFFICE MAX 00002204 11/28/2006 11/30/2006 KMART 00030346 Trans Amount Name $359.20 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN $58.58 JUDY TETZLAFF $70.29 JUDY TETZLAFF $262.36 JUDY TETZLAFF 599.68 JUDY TETZLAFF 899.68 JUDY TETZLAFF $99.68 JUDY TETZLAFF $369.70 JUDY TETZLAFF $99.68 JUDY TETZLAFF $140.58 JUDY TETZLAFF $70.29 JUDY TETZLAFF $70.29 JUDY TETZLAFF 510.63 TODD TEVLIN ($100.00) DAVID J THOMALLA $7.44 JOSEPH WATERS $2.39 SUSAN ZWIEG $7.44 SUSAN ZWIEG $14.24 SUSAN ZWIEG $51,014.42 12/21/2006 Check Date 71634 71635 71636 71637 71638 71639 71640 71641 71642 71643 71644 71645 71646 71647 71648 71649 71650 71651 71652 71653 71654 71655 71656 71657 71658 71659 71660 71661 71662 71663 71664 71665 71666 71667 71668 71669 71670 71671 71672 71673 71674 71675 71676 71677 71678 71679 71680 71681 71682 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 Vendor 00283 00363 01360 01360 01360 01360 01504 01504 02410 01190 01622 00101 03744 01811 01811 01811 01811 01865 03108 00230 00340 02050 00241 00354 00372 03035 00426 00103 01401 03798 01867 03542 03799 03538 02506 03787 03800 03786 01857 03021 03270 03270 01126 01095 01095 03022 03737 02091 02909 01175 00001 00001 00001 00001 00001 00001 00001 00001 Check Register City of Maplewood CENTURY COLLEGE DLT SOLUTIONS, INC. REINHART FOODSERVICE REINHART FOODSERVICE REINHART FOODSERVICE REINHART FOODSERVICE CITY OF ST PAUL CITY OF ST PAUL WELLS FARGO LEASING INC XCELENERGY 3M SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA BRUCE K ANDERSON ANTHONY BARILLA, JR BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC DON BOWMAN TRACY BOWMAN BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. CRAMER BUILDING SERVICES CRITICAL CONNECTION ECOLOGICAL CSI SOFTWARE CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS, INC. DALCO BOB DOLLERSCHELL KIRK DUELLMAN EARL F ANDERSON INC FIRST STUDENT INC CLAUDIA HAAS PERRY HANSON BRIAN HEATHER HENKE MANUFACTURING CORP PATRICK JAMES HUBBARD HUNT ELECTRIC CORP INSPEC JAMES WEDGEWOOD, INC JBJ DINING INC JOHNSON BROS WELL DRILLING JENNIFER KIMLINGER MIKE MILLER MIKE MILLER MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE MODERN FENCE & CONST INC MODERN FENCE & CONST INC RANDALL MOTT MARCIA CHRISTENA MUELLER JOHN NAUGHTON NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR Description FF TUITION SURVEY 2007 SUBSCRIPTION MDSE FOR RESALE MDSE FOR RESALE MDSE RETURNED MDSE RETURNED MEDICAL SUPPLIES RADIO SERVICE & REPAIR - NOV COPIER LEASE 12109 - 119107 ELECTRIC UTILITY MCC TICKET SALES REIMS FOR AIRFARE TO NATIONAL VOLLEYBALL REFEREE MDSE FOR RESALE MDSE FOR RESALE MDSE FOR RESALE MDSE FOR RESALE VOLLEYBALL REFEREE VOLLEYBALL REFEREE RIP RAP & CLASS 2 TRANS MAINT AGREEMENT - QTRLY REED CANARY MANAGEMENT MEMBERSHIP CARDS REPAIR PUMPER TRUCK MCC COURT AREA BARREL ROOF REIMS FOR LODGING REIMB FOR BOOTS PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MCC BUS FEE TO EIDEM HOLMSTEAD MCC DRAMA INSTRUCTOR VOLLEYBALL REFEREE VOLLEYBALL REFEREE SNOW BUCKET FOR CAT BACK -HOE VOLLEYBALL REFEREE ELECTRICAL WORK AT WAKEFIELD MCC WALL LEAKAGE INVESTIGATION MCC CONCERT FOR SENIOR CITIZENS PROJ 06 -12 CLOSE DEVELOPER FUND CLEAN OUT & SEAL WELL AT JOY PARK VOLLEYBALL REFEREE BASKETBALL OFFICIALS 1212,9,16 VOLLEYBALL REFEREE PERA LIFE INS - DEC FENCE AT GOODRICH PARK FENCE AT GOODRICH PARK VOLLEYBALL REFEREE VOLLEYBALL REFEREE REIMB FOR SAFETY BOOTS ROAD SALT MONTHLY UTILITIES REF PEI WEI - OVERPMT GAMBLING LIC REFUND MW ATHLETIC ASSOC REFUND EMMA NORTON SRVS - REFUND A JOHNSON - MEMBERSHIP REFUND R HAFOKA MEMBERSHIP REFUND E BIRCHEM SEWER BACKUP REFUND S PALREDDY MEMBERSHIP REFUND J WELLER MEMBERSHIP Amount 712.30 5,856.00 353.98 324.16 - 189.00 - 341.10 1,042.77 422.92 1,467.57 10,077.00 461.34 235.60 276.00 315.00 189.00 189.00 126.00 423.00 69.00 666.37 2,217.76 1,459.46 560.00 124.14 2,450.00 89.70 100.00 2,466.54 202.50 560.00 345.00 69.00 4,980.00 920.00 368.94 1,500.00 650.00 362.99 2,285.00 46.00 1,083.00 138.00 396.00 49,925.00 300.00 276.00 276.00 144.50 13,263.58 3,069.72 5,000.00 250.00 178.33 166.14 144.00 125.00 51.00 34.00 4 Check Register City of Maplewood 12/21/2006 Check Date 71683 71684 71685 71686 71687 71688 71689 71690 71691 71692 71693 71694 71695 71696 71697 71698 71699 71700 71701 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 12/2612006 1212612006 1212612006 Vendor 01225 01225 01863 01254 01254 03766 01359 01340 01386 02859 03073 01497 02705 01574 03743 01580 01698 01699 01750 01872 01770 OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS ROGER PACKER PEPSI -COLA COMPANY PEPSI -COLA COMPANY PRIMARY PRODUCTS CO REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL XX REGIONS HOSPITAL RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC. RT ELECTRIC, INC SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC SPRINGSTED INC DAVE SWAN T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC TRAFFIC & PARKING CONTROL INC TSE, INC. UNITED WAY OF THE ST. PAUL UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA THE WATSON CO INC MARK WEBER WHITE BEAR LAKE RESERVE UNIT 68 Checks in this report. Description VEHICLE SUPPLIES POCKET SPANNER WRENCH VOLLEYBALL REFEREE MDSE FOR RESALE MDSE FOR RESALE PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES CAR WASHES - NOV PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES EMERGENCY REPAIR OF SEWER MAIN SIREN MAINT LANDSCAPE ARCH SRVS 711 - 9130 REBATE CALCULATIONS 2004C REIMB FOR LICENSING ASPHALT POLE FOR DISPLAY SIGN REFUND CHARITABLE GAMBLING QUARTERLY PAYMENT OCT - DEC TRAINING FEE MDSE FOR RESALE VOLLEYBALL REFEREE RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING - 6 Amount 111.83 38.34 575.00 569.65 512.70 325.80 117.05 430.35 5,706.00 186.00 1,075.00 1,700.00 170.00 259.30 238.40 250.00 371.00 170.00 281.92 253.00 180.00 I .SL. ! / 0.30 im CITY OF MApLBNDDD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee 12M4/08 12/l4/08 12/14/OG 12/14/00 12/15/O6 12/15/O6 12/15/OS 12/18/OS 12/15/08 12/11/08 12/15/00 12/15/OG 12/1A/O6 12/2O/O6 12/18/OH MN State Treasurer |CMA(Vantagepointe) Orchard Trust K4N Dept of Natural Resources MN State Treasurer U.S.Tnaaourer P.E.R.& MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN Dept of Revenue Labor Unions MidAm*hca - |NG MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer ARC Administration 11001fim Description Drivers License/Deputy Registrar Deferred Compensation Deferred Compensation DNR electronic licenses Drivers License/Deputy Registrar Federal Payroll Tax P. E.R.A. Drivers License/Deputy Registrar State Payroll Tax Sales Tax Union Dues HRA Flex plan Drivers License/Deputy Registrar Drivers License/Deputy Registrar OCRP& Flex plan payments Amount �� Check Register City of Maplewood 12128/2006 Check Date Vendor Description Amount 71702 1212712006 03501 R H HOMES ESCROW REFUND - 3065 CAREY 2,519.38 71703 0110212007 00283 CENTURY COLLEGE LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING 1,785.00 71704 0110212007 03576 EUREKA RECYCLING RECYCLING - NOV 19,260.31 71705 0110212007 03365 NICK FRANZEN REIMS INT, CELL, MILEAGE 11118 -12126 118.46 71706 0110212007 00687 HUGO'S TREE CARE INC TREE REMOVAL 925.49 0110212007 00687 HUGO'S TREE CARE INC TOP TREES 319.50 71707 01102/2007 01819 MCLEOD USA LOCAL PHONE SERVICE 11116 -12/15 2,089.21 71708 01102/2007 01360 REINHART FOODSERVICE MDSE FOR RESALE 270.09 71709 0110212007 01504 CITY OF ST PAUL SEWER AGREEMENT 02 -7254 6,239.53 0110212007 01504 CITY OF ST PAUL SEWER AGREEMENT 02 -8697 1,309.00 71710 1212912006 02481 PETE FRANK BASKETBALL COORDINATOR 2,000.00 71711 0110212007 01996 ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMS EMT TRAINING CLASS 595.00 01/0212007 01996 ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMS EMT TRAINING CLASS 595.00 01/0212007 01996 ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMS EMT TRAINING CLASS 595.00 0110212007 01996 ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMS EMT TRAINING CLASS 595.00 0110212007 01996 ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMS EMT TRAINING CLASS 595.00 0110212007 01996 ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMS EMT TRAINING CLASS 595.00 0110212007 01996 ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMS EMT TRAINING CLASS 595.00 0110212007 01996 ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMS EMT TRAINING CLASS 595.00 0110212007 01996 ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMS EMT TRAINING CLASS 595.00 71712 01/0212007 03335 AMERICAN ENGINEERING PROD 04 -17 TESTING SRVS 132.90 71713 01/0212007 00090 AMERICAN RED CROSS CHARITABLE GAMBLING FUND PROG 1,100.00 71714 01102/2007 00111 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC PATROL & BOARDING FEES 1214 - 12117 1,310.42 71715 01102/2007 00174 STAN BELDE K -9 MAINTENANCE - JAN 35.00 71716 01/0212007 01936 CHAD BERGO REIMB FOR INT,PHONE,MILEAGE 12/07 94.58 71717 01/0212007 01811 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC MDSE FOR RESALE 157.50 71718 01102/2007 00211 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP. PROD 06 -10 PROF SRVS THRU 12101 324.00 71719 01102/2007 00242 CWH RESEARCH, INC. LAW ENFORCEMENT EXAMS & STUDY 1,202.00 71720 01/0212007 02743 RICHARD DOBLAR REIMS FOR TUITION 427.50 71721 01/0212007 03801 EDGERTON ELEMENTARY PTA CHARITABLE GAMBLING 1,700.00 71722 0110212007 02724 FBI /LEEDA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 50.00 0110212007 02724 FBI /LEEDA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 50.00 01/0212007 02724 FBI /LEEDA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 50.00 71723 01/0212007 00589 DAVE GRAF KARATE INSTRUCTOR 1215 - 12126 113.75 71724 01102/2007 00668 STEVEN HIEBERT K -9 MAINTENANCE - JAN 35.00 71725 0110212007 03802 HIGHWAY HANDYMAN PRODUCTS ROLLER APPLICATOR FOR SIGN 1,427.10 71726 01/0212007 02237 IMPERIAL IMPRESSIONS POLICE INFO CARDS 207.68 71727 01/0212007 00827 L M C I T WORK COMP QUARTERLY DEP PREM 61,704.50 71728 01102/2007 01081 M C P A ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 40.00 71729 01102/2007 00985 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER -JAN 201,847.06 71730 01/0212007 01079 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 195.00 01/0212007 01079 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 80.00 71731 01102/2007 03622 MN OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECH WIDE AREA NETWORK - NOV 392.00 71732 0110212007 01088 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY REGISTRATION FEE 540.00 71733 01/0212007 01156 JEAN NELSON REIMS FOR MILEAGE 11/1 - 12/19 61.05 71734 01/0212007 01961 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS CELL PHONE 11109 - 12108 37.29 71735 0110212007 03587 NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL ANNUAL EXPLORER RECHARTERING 93.00 71736 0110212007 02300 OAKDALE LOCKSMITHS REPAIR LOCK 191.26 71737 01/02/2007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND S MCDONOUGH - AMB 06009612 1,179.14 71738 01/02/2007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND T ROOT - CANCELLED CLASS 75.00 71739 01102/2007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND L OMAN - CANCELLED CLASS 42.00 71740 0110212007 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND L LEMAY - CANCELLED CLASS 42.00 71741 01/0212007 01250 DENNIS PECK REIMS FOR PARKING & MILEAGE 12122 15.90 71742 01/0212007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT MDSE FOR RESALE 451.46 01102/2007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT PROGRAM SUPPLIES 253.62 01/0212007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT MDSE FOR RESALE 186.50 12 Check Register City of Maplewood 12128/2006 Check Date Vendor Description Amount MDSE FOR RESALE 0110212007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT MDSE FOR RESALE 0110212007 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 71743 0110212007 03398 SHAMROCK GROUP MONTHLY LTD PREMIUN - JAN 0110212007 03398 SHAMROCK GROUP 71744 0110212007 00198 ST PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS 71745 0110212007 01580 TSE, INC. 71746 01102/2007 00529 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO 01102/2007 00529 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO 71747 0110212007 02464 US BANK 0110212007 02464 US BANK 71748 0110212007 01712 VENBURG TIRE CO. 71749 01/0212007 01750 THE WATSON CO INC 71750 01/0212007 01828 KRIS A WEAVER 49 Checks in this report. MDSE FOR RESALE 134.44 RETURNED FRUIT -66.64 MDSE FOR RESALE 184.00 MDSE FOR RESALE 121.00 WATER UTILITY 932.31 JANITORIAL SERVICE 10115 - 11111 990.00 MONTHLY LTD PREMIUN - JAN 3,022.77 STD PLAN 4043120 -0 -1 JAN 1,662.05 PAYING AGENT FEES 431.25 PAYING AGENT FEES 158.13 REPAIR FLAT 22.00 MDSE FOR RESALE 281.92 REIMS FOR MILEAGE 9115 - 12120 15.58 325.923.99 13 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee Description 12/21/06 12/22/06 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 12/11/06 12/22/06 MN Dept of Revenue Fuel Tax 12/21/06 12/22/06 Pitney Bowes Postage 12/21/06 12/22/06 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 12/22/06 12/26/06 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 12/26/06 12127/06 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 12/22/06 12/27/06 US Bank VISA One Card* Purchasing card items 12/27/06 12/28/06 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar TOTAL *Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached. Amount 12,027.17 226.00 2,985.00 758.00 7,527.75 9,018.78 51,501.99 10,701.25 ITH VISA Transactions 12 -08 -06 to 12/22/06 Trans Date Posting Dat Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 12/13/06 12/14/06 GAL *GALLS INC $1,888.15 SCOTT ANDREWS 12/13/06 12/14/06 GAL *GALLS INC $629.38 SCOTT ANDREWS 12/08/06 12/11/06 HEALTHEAST TRANSPORTATN $1,869.24 JOHN BANICK 12/08/06 12/11/06 DON' PAINT & BODY SHOP $1,978.87 JOHN BANICK 12/12/06 12/13/06 GRAFIX SHOPPE $207.68 JOHN BANICK 12/12/06 12/15/06 SHRED -IT $159.84 JOHN BANICK 12/15/06 12/18/06 TOUSLEY FORD 127200021 $278.31 JOHN BANICK 12/18/06 12/19/06 BENCHMARK PROF SEMINARS $295.00 JOHN BANICK 12/19/06 12/20/06 HUDSON MAP COMPANY $135.06 JOHN BANICK 12/08/06 12/11/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $15.93 JIM BEHAN 12/11/06 12/13/06 THERMO -DYNE INC $1,952.28 JIM BEHAN 12/11/06 12/13/06 THERMO -DYNE INC $1,949.61 JIM BEHAN 12/11/06 12/13/06 POOLSIDE $18.96 JIM BEHAN 12/13/06 12/14/06 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER $141.47 JIM BEHAN 12/13/06 12/14/06 GRAZZINI BROTHERS AND COM $677.00 JIM BEHAN 12/19/06 12/20/06 UPS *0007Q5JW6Y06 $10.35 JIM BEHAN 12/20/06 12/21/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS $46.64 JIM BEHAN 12/20/06 12/21/06 ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC $234.00 JIM BEHAN 12/09/06 12/11/06 APPLE SOFTWARE ORDER CTR $10.60 CHAD BERGO 12/21/06 12/22/06 EMETRIX ONLINE SALES $46.70 CHAD BERGO 12/14/06 12/19/06 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING {ST. $98.16 OAKLEY BIESANZ 12/15/06 12/18/06 BYERLY'S ST PAUL $8.20 OAKLEY BIESANZ 12/09/06 12/11/06 SEARS ROEBUCK 1122 $69.99 TROY BRINK 12/12/06 12/13/06 LITURGICAL PUB -GEN DEP $760.00 HEIDI CAREY 12/12/06 12/14/06 FULFILLMENT SERVICES /P $350.60 HEIDI CAREY 12/18/06 12/19/06 DGI *DYNAMIC GRAPHICS $79.00 HEIDI CAREY 12/20/06 12/22/06 JOANN ETC #1970 $16.37 HEIDI CAREY 12/11/06 12/12/06 G & K SERVICES 006 $682.05 LINDA CROSSON 12/15/06 12/19/06 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLU $77.48 LINDA CROSSON 12/16/06 12/18/06 PAYPAL INC $59.95 LINDA CROSSON 12/21/06 12/22/06 COMCAST CABLE COMM $89.60 LINDA CROSSON 12/08/06 12/11/06 FRATTALLONE'S ACE HDWE $14.90 CHARLES DEAVER 12/11/06 12/12/06 G & K SERVICES 006 $58.14 CHARLES DEAVER 12/11/06 12/13/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $422.81 CHARLES DEAVER 12/12/06 12/14/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 ($422.81) CHARLES DEAVER 12/07/06 12/11/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $28.18 THOMAS DEBILZAN 12/06/06 12/11/06 VIKING ELECTRIC -ST. PAUL $68.60 DAVE EDSON 12/13/06 12/14/06 TARGET 00011858 $106.49 ANDREW ENGSTROM 12/01/06 12/11/06 CRAMER BLDG SERVICES INC $800.00 LARRY FARR 12/07/06 12/11/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $381.15 LARRY FARR 12/08/06 12/11/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $82.90 LARRY FARR 12/10/06 12/11/06 GOODIN COMPANY $236.87 LARRY FARR 12/11/06 12/12/06 G & K SERVICES 006 $287.93 LARRY FARR 12/11/06 12/12/06 PREMIUM WATERS INC $5.33 LARRY FARR 12/11/06 12/12/06 HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION $538.92 LARRY FARR 12/11/06 12/15/06 CRAMER BLDG SERVICES INC $710.00 LARRY FARR 12/12/06 12/14/06 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1 $20.00 LARRY FARR 12/18/06 12/19/06 TARGET 00011858 $70.83 LARRY FARR 12/18/06 12/19/06 RADIOSHACK COR00161455 $45.75 LARRY FARR 12/18/06 12/19/06 WW GRAINGER 500 $178.67 LARRY FARR 12/18/06 12/19/06 WW GRAINGER 500 $65.18 LARRY FARR 12/18/06 12/20/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 {$12.72} LARRY FARR 12/18/06 12/20/06 MICHAELS #2744 $7.97 LARRY FARR 12/18/06 12/20/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $70.91 LARRY FARR 12/20/06 12/21/06 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $10.42 LARRY FARR 12/20/06 12/22/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $42.89 LARRY FARR 15 VISA Transactions 12 -08 -06 to 12/22/06 Trans Date Posting Dat Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 12/06/06 12/20/06 RED WING SHOE STORE $469.20 DAVID FISHER 12/13/06 12/15/06 CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03 $3.72 MYCHAL FOWLDS 12/14/06 12/15/06 CABLING SERVICES CORPORA $340.41 MYCHAL FOWLDS 12/15/06 12/18/06 QWESTCOMM *TN651 $265.80 MYCHAL FOWLDS 12/16/06 12/18/06 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTORS $1,140.04 MYCHAL FOWLDS 12/16/06 12/18/06 GOVDOCS.COM, INC. $410.00 MYCHAL FOWLDS 12/07/06 12/11/06 ALPHA VIDEO + AUDIO IN $4,275.98 NICK FRANZEN 12/07/06 12/11/06 OFFICE MAX 00024125 $106.48 NICK FRANZEN 12/07/06 12/11/06 CIRCUIT CITY SS #3137 $68.15 NICK FRANZEN 12/08/06 12/11/06 SPRINT -STORE #4354 $319.49 NICK FRANZEN 12/12/06 12/13/06 COMPUSA M/O #482 $51.63 NICK FRANZEN 12/14/06 12/15/06 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTORS $263.57 NICK FRANZEN 12/21/06 12/22/06 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTORS $134.40 NICK FRANZEN 12/12/06 12/13/06 PAKOR INC $412.30 PATRICIA FRY 12/14/06 12/18/06 PRAIRIE MOON NURSERY 1 $69.22 VIRGINIA GAYNOR 12/15/06 12/18/06 MINNESOTA BOOKSTORE $14.86 VIRGINIA GAYNOR 12/20/06 12/22/06 RED WING SHOE STORE $156.40 DAVID GERMAIN 12/07/06 12/11/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $63.68 JEAN GLASS 12/15/06 12/18/06 CLOVER SUPER FOODS $158.67 MIKE GRAF 12/19/06 12/21/06 FULFILLMENT SERVICES /P $660.72 MIKE GRAF 12/20/06 12/22/06 ARAMARK REF SVS #6013- $720.53 MIKE GRAF 12/21/06 12/22/06 CLOVER SUPER FOODS $159.95 MIKE GRAF 12/08/06 12/11/06 BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKLE $6.18 JANET M GREW HAYMAN 12/19/06 12/21/06 BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKLE $5.48 JANET M GREW HAYMAN 12/10/06 12/11/06 PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC. $50.00 KAREN E GUILFOILE 12/12/06 12/14/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $24.31 KAREN E GUILFOILE 12/14/06 12/15/06 VZW APO CCVISIONNO $56.26 KAREN E GUILFOILE 12/20/06 12/22/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $199.08 KAREN E GUILFOILE 12/08/06 12/11/06 OXYGEN SERVICE CO INC $28.34 MARK HAAG 12/20/06 12/21/06 ARVEY PAPER & OFFICE PRO $556.74 LORI HANSEN 12/14/06 12/18/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $24.91 LORI HANSOM 12/18/06 12/19/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $16.28 LORI HANSOM 12/19/06 12/20/06 DICTATION DEPOT $19.77 LORI HANSON 12/19/06 12/22/06 AMERICAN RED CROSS $45.00 RON HORWATH 12/19/06 12/22/06 AMERICAN RED CROSS $45.00 RON HORWATH 12/12/06 12/13/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS $35.22 ANN E HUTCHINSON 12/20/06 12/21/06 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $21.19 JON JAROSCH 12/15/06 12/18/06 CUB FOODS, INC. $77.99 KEVIN JOHNSON 12/08/06 12/11/06 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT $6.88 DON JONES 12/07/06 12/11/06 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $18.11 TOM KALKA 12/18/06 12/20/06 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $32.84 TOM KALKA 12/13/06 12/15/06 PANERA BREAD #3459 $51.56 LOIS KNUTSON 12/18/06 12/19/06 TARGET 00011858 $51.06 MARY B KOEHNEN 12/15/06 12/18/06 RADIOSHACK COR00161455 $12.74 DAVID KVAM 12/15/06 12/18/06 BATTERIES PLUS $15.92 DAVID KVAM 12/11/06 12/11/06 SPRINTPCS AUTOPYMT RC1 $54.30 ERIN M LABEREE 12/19/06 12/22/06 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC {$16.42} MICHAEL LIDBERG 12/20/06 12/22/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $58.29 DENNIS LINDORFF 12/11/06 12/12/06 MENARDS 3059 $31.44 STEVE LUKIN 12/12/06 12/13/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS $829.90 STEVE LUKIN 12/15/06 12/18/06 DE LAGS LANDEN OP01 OF 01 $379.14 STEVE LUKIN 12/15/06 12/18/06 VZW APO CCVISIONNO $27.18 STEVE LUKIN 12/20/06 12/21/06 AMERICAN MESSAGING RECUR $17.74 STEVE LUKIN 12/20/06 12/21/06 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC $107.39 STEVE LUKIN 12/19/06 12/21/06 THE UPS STORE #2171 $7.35 DAN MARTIN 12/08/06 12/11/06 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT $170.52 MARK MARUSKA 16 VISA Transactions 12 -08 -06 to 12/22/06 Trans Date Posting Dat Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 12/11/06 12/12/06 G & K SERVICES 006 $513.58 MARK MARUSKA 12/12/06 12/15/06 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPL $42.32 MARK MARUSKA 12/12/06 12/15/06 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPL $11.01 MARK MARUSKA 12/15/06 12/18/06 VZW APO CCVISIONNO $39.48 MARK MARUSKA 12/15/06 12/18/06 VZW APO CCVISIONNO $60.67 ED NADEAU 12/09/06 12/11/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS $421.53 BRYAN NAGEL 12/14/06 12/18/06 ARMSTRONG CRANE & RIGGING $735.44 BRYAN NAGEL 12/21/06 12/22/06 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $5.50 JEAN NELSON 12/07/06 12/11/06 OFFICE MAX 00002204 $9.02 AMY NIVEN 12/11/06 12/12/06 G & K SERVICES 006 $659.24 AMY NIVEN 12/11/06 12/12/06 G & K SERVICES 006 $228.55 AMY NIVEN 12/11/06 12/12/06 G & K SERVICES 006 $128.85 AMY NIVEN 12/11/06 12/12/06 MENARDS 3059 $4.75 RICHARD NORDQUIST 12/08/06 12/11/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $8.03 MARY KAY PALANK 12/14/06 12/18/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $19.15 MARY KAY PALANK 12/20/06 12/22/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $38.30 MARY KAY PALANK 12/20/06 12/21/06 PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC. $600.00 DENNIS PECK 12/12/06 12/14/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $34.47 KATHLEEN PECK HALL 12/20/06 12/22/06 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $2.83 ROBERT PETERSON 12/06/06 12/11/06 TAPE $35.95 PHILIP F POWELL 12/08/06 12/11/06 THE MALLORY COMPANY $233.65 PHILIP F POWELL 12/09/06 12/11/06 LABSAFE *1008893787 $109.94 PHILIP F POWELL 12/09/06 12/11/06 DR *NUANCE $58.51 PHILIP F POWELL 12/14/06 12/15/06 BEST BUY MHT 00000109 $129.90 PHILIP F POWELL 12/14/06 12/15/06 SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABO $129.72 PHILIP F POWELL 12/15/06 12/18/06 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE $112.86 PHILIP F POWELL 12/15/06 12/19/06 MODERN BUSINESS PRODUCTS, $53.25 PHILIP F POWELL 12/17/06 12/18/06 FRATTALLONE'S ACE HDWE $34.05 PHILIP F POWELL 12/19/06 12/20/06 FITZCO INC $148.36 PHILIP F POWELL 12/19/06 12/20/06 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE $25.00 PHILIP F POWELL 12/19/06 12/20/06 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE $255.48 PHILIP F POWELL 12/19/06 12/21/06 PEAVEY CORPORATION $183.90 PHILIP F POWELL 12/21/06 12/22/06 ABACUS PLUS SERVICES INC $678.41 PHILIP F POWELL 12/09/06 12/11/06 TARGET 00011858 $183.98 ROBERT PRECHTEL 12/16/06 12/18/06 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $208.52 ROBERT PRECHTEL 12/18/06 12/19/06 MENARDS 3059 $23.41 ROBERT PRECHTEL 12/19/06 12/21/06 OFFICE DEPOT #2592 $15.96 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 12/07/06 12/11/06 MERIT CHEVROLET CO. $21.49 STEVEN PRIEM 12/07/06 12/11/06 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039 $1,530.64 STEVEN PRIEM 12/07/06 12/11/06 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039 $1,530.64 STEVEN PRIEM 12/11/06 12/13/06 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $176.62 STEVEN PRIEM 12/12/06 12/14/06 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $167.69 STEVEN PRIEM 12/13/06 12/14/06 POMPS TIRE SERVICE $838.37 STEVEN PRIEM 12/13/06 12/14/06 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19 $236.88 STEVEN PRIEM 12/13/06 12/15/06 METCALF MOVING & STORAGE $100.00 STEVEN PRIEM 12/14/06 12/15/06 GOPHER BEARING COMPANY IN $10.37 STEVEN PRIEM 12/14/06 12/15/06 CENTER FRAME INC. $150.00 STEVEN PRIEM 12/14/06 12/18/06 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $6.92 STEVEN PRIEM 12/15/06 12/19/06 TRI STATE BOBCAT INC $32.46 STEVEN PRIEM 12/18/06 12/19/06 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT $115.01 STEVEN PRIEM 12/18/06 12/20/06 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $7.09 STEVEN PRIEM 12/19/06 12/20/06 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19 $9.10 STEVEN PRIEM 12/19/06 12/21/06 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $8.69 STEVEN PRIEM 12/19/06 12/21/06 TRI STATE BOBCAT INC $257.06 STEVEN PRIEM 12/20/06 12/22/06 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP $52.06 STEVEN PRIEM 12/20/06 12/22/06 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039 $184.31 STEVEN PRIEM 17 VISA Transactions 12 -08 -06 to 12/22/06 Trans Date Posting Dat Merchant Name Trans Amount Name 12/13/06 12/14/06 TCA *U.S. DIARY $530.63 KEVIN RABBETT 12/11/06 12/12/06 PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISIN $810.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX 12/12/06 12/13/06 MN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH $290.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX 12/13/06 12/15/06 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $68.84 MICHAEL REILLY 12/18/06 12/21/06 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $629.42 MICHAEL REILLY 12/12/06 12/15/06 SUPERAMERICA 4089 Q64 $28.29 AUDRA ROBBINS 12/14/06 12/15/06 TARGET 00011858 $21.24 AUDRA ROBBINS 12/07/06 12/11/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $233.91 ROBERT RUNNING 12/07/06 12/11/06 JOANN ETC #1970 $12.74 HARRIET J RYDEL 12/08/06 12/11/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $121.96 HARRIET J RYDEL 12/11/06 12/12/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $54.45 HARRIET J RYDEL 12/14/06 12/18/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $154.03 HARRIET J RYDEL 12/18/06 12/20/06 PEI WEI ASIANDINER0113 $125.67 HARRIET J RYDEL 12/20/06 12/22/06 COMCST OF TWIN CITIES DTS $42.95 HARRIET J RYDEL 12/15/06 12/18/06 SHRED -IT {$43.35} DEB SCHMIDT 12/12/06 12/14/06 THE OLIVE GARD00012005 $37.86 MICHAEL SHORTREED 12/13/06 12/15/06 ROILY POLY SANDWHICHES $11.95 MICHAEL SHORTREED 12/14/06 12/18/06 PEI WEI ASIANDINER0113 $28.22 MICHAEL SHORTREED 12/18/06 12/19/06 MSU CASHIERS OFFICE POS $50.00 MICHAEL SHORTREED 12/19/06 12/21/06 PERKINS FAMILY RESTAURANT $27.00 MICHAEL SHORTREED 12/11/06 12/12/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $114.99 ANDREA SINDT 12/13/06 12/14/06 LABSAFE *1008909878 $56.54 ANDREA SINDT 12/14/06 12/18/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 {$76.66} ANDREA SINDT 12/14/06 12/18/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $54.13 ANDREA SINDT 12/13/06 12/14/06 RED'S SAVOY PIZZA $186.61 PAULINE STAPLES 12/15/06 12/18/06 SUPERAMERICA 4089 Q64 $8.51 PAULINE STAPLES 12/20/06 12/21/06 HEART RATE MONITORS USA $487.50 PAULINE STAPLES 12/15/06 12/18/06 DE LAGS LANDEN OP01 OF 01 $626.43 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 12/19/06 12/20/06 CUB FOODS, INC. $31.20 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 12/20/06 12/21/06 WEBER ELECTRIC $123.00 LYLE SWANSON 12/20/06 12/21/06 WEBER ELECTRIC $223.98 LYLE SWANSON 12/14/06 12/15/06 COMCAST CABLE COMM $111.30 JUDY TETZLAFF 12/21/06 12/22/06 QWESTCOMM *TN651 $344.75 JUDY TETZLAFF 12/08/06 12/11/06 MENARDS 3059 $268.47 TODD TEVLIN 12/16/06 12/18/06 IRON AGE CORP $162.00 TODD TEVLIN 12/12/06 12/14/06 PROFEEL MARKETING INC $449.95 DAVID J THOMALLA 12/21/06 12/22/06 DON' PAINT & BODY SHOP $1,122.80 DAVID J THOMALLA 12/08/06 12/11/06 AAA ALL CITY VACUUM $9.29 JOSEPH WATERS 12/08/06 12/11/06 MENARDS 3059 $4.41 JOSEPH WATERS 12/19/06 12/21/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $3.07 JOSEPH WATERS 12/20/06 12/22/06 N WATER WORKS SPLY #2518 $226.42 JOSEPH WATERS 12/12/06 12/14/06 PIZZA MAN $119.85 SUSAN ZWIEG $51,501.99 18 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK 4 CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 12115/06 CAVE, REBECCA 397.80 12/15/06 HJELLE, ERIK 397.80 12/15/06 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 397.80 121/15/06 ROSSBACH, WILLIAM 397.80 12/15/06 COPELAND, EUGENE 3,090.00 12/15/06 RYDEL, HARRIET 1,850.61 12/15/06 FARR, LARRY 1,912.50 12/15/06 SWANSON, LYLE 1,711.57 12/15/06 ARNOLD, AJLA 519.75 12/15/06 RAMEAUX, T1 ERESE 2,581.84 12/15/06 SCHMIDT, DEBORAH 1.797.91 121/15/06 ANDERSON, CAROLE 811.07 12/15/06 BAUMAN, GAYLE 3,898.34 12/15/06 DEBILZAN, JUDY 900.00 12/15/06 JACKSON, MARY 1,873.35 12/15/06 KELSEY, CONNIE 992.11 12/15/06 TETZLAFF, JUDY 1,873.35 12/15/06 FRY, PATRICIA 1,818.50 12/15/06 GUILFOILE, KAREN 2,969.70 121/15/06 MORSON, JOHN 383.04 12/15/06 SPANGLER, EDNA 921.45 12/15/06 ANDERSON, SUZANNE 780.00 12/15/06 JAGOE, CAROL 1,679.68 12/15/06 KELLY, LISA 1,303.28 12/15/06 MECHELKE, SHERRIE 1,083.09 12/15/06 MOY, PAMELA 95117 12/15/06 OLSON, SANDRA 3,956.01 121/15/06 OSTER, ANDREA 1,820.80 12/15/06 WEAVER, KRISTINE 1,839.76 12/15/06 BANICK, JOHN 4,017.82 12/15/06 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,693.35 12/15/06 POWELL, PHILIP 2,394.54 12/15/06 RICHIE, CAROLE 1,684.28 12/15/06 THOMALLA, DAVID 4,429.00 12/15/06 ABEL, CLINT 2,745.91 121/15/06 ALDRIDGE, MARK 2,73832 12/15/06 ANDREWS, SCOTT 3,367.28 12/15/06 BAKKE, LONN 2,642.57 12/15/06 BELDE, STANLEY 2,760.82 12/15/06 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 2,907.63 12/15/06 BOHL, JOHN 2,859.13 12/15/06 BUSACK, DANIEL 2,40011 ius CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK 4 CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 121/15/06 COFFEY, KEVIN 2,587.73 12115/06 GROTTY, KERRY 2,741.49 12/15106 DOBLAR, RICHARD 3,079.66 12/15/06 GABRIEL, ANTHONY 2,339.41 12/15/06 HEINZ, STEPHEN 2,782.46 12115106 HIEBERT, STEVEN 3,244.72 12/151/06 JOHNSON, KEVIN 3,466.06 12/15/06 KALKA, THOMAS 686.28 121/15/06 KAKIS, FLINT 3,155.57 12/15/06 KONG, TOMMY 2,400.11 12/15/06 KROLL, BRETT 2,400.11 12/15/06 KVAM, DAVID 3,523.42 12/15/06 LANGNER, TODD 1,943.02 12/15/06 LARSON, DANIEL 2,400.11 12/151/06 LU, JOHNNIE 2,514.15 12/15/06 MARINO, JASON 2,400.11 121/15/06 MARTIN, DANIEL 654.69 12/15/06 MARTIN, JERROLD 2,514.38 12/15/06 MCCARTY, GLEN 2,331.55 12/15/06 METRY, ALESIA 2,698.09 12/15/06 NYE, MICHAEL 2,305.48 12/15/06 OLSON, JULIE 2,532.55 12/151/06 RABBETT, KEVIN 3,587.70 12/15/06 RHUDE, MATTHEW 1,874.47 121/15/06 STEFFEN, SCOTT 3,642.60 12/15/06 STEINER, JOSEPH 1,840.93 12/15/06 SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM 1,891.61 12/15/06 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 3,016.01 12/15/06 IRAN, JOSEPH 2,35298 12/15/06 WENZEL, JAY 2,444.26 12/151/06 XIONG, KAO 2,400.11 12/15/06 BARTZ, PAUL 2,925.35 121/15/06 BERGERON, JOSEPH 3,22617 12/15/06 DUGAS, MICHAEL 2,514.38 12/15/06 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 2,605.80 12/15/06 FLOR, TIMOTHY 3,100.75 12/15/06 FRASER, JOHN 2,720.07 12/15/06 LANGNER, SCOTT 2,445.82 12/151/06 PALMA, STEVEN 3,254.79 12/15/06 THEISEN, PAUL 2,625.82 121/15/06 THIENES, PAUL 2,628.65 12/15/06 BARTA, JEREMY 2,032.21 NE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK 4 CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 121/15/06 DAWSON, RICHARD 2,95939 12115/06 DUELLMAN, KIRK 2,173.00 12/15106 EVERSON, PAUL 2,481.49 12/15!06 HALWEG, JODI 1,991.84 12/15/06 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS 2,362.79 12115106 NOVAK, JEROME 2,272.98 12/151/06 PARSONS, KURT 2,175.62 12/15/06 PETERSON, ROBERT 2.579.71 121/15/06 PRECHTEL, ROBERT 2,428.15 12/15/06 SVENDSEN, RONALD 3,004.18 12/15/06 GERVAIS -JR CLARENCE 2,868.34 12/15/06 BAUER, MICHELLE 1,722.95 12/15/06 BURAU, JAMES 1,61836 12/15/06 FLAUGHER, JAYME 1,931.75 12/151/06 HERMAN SON, CHAD 1,669.35 12/15/06 HUBIN, KENNARD 2,145.08 121/15/06 KNAPP, BRETT 2,297.70 12/15/06 LINN, BRYAN 2,025.39 12/15/06 PACOLT, MARSHA 2,529.68 12/15/06 RABINE, JANET 2,268.25 12/15/06 SCHAULS. ADAM 195.00 12/15/06 STAHNKE, JULIE 1,931.75 12/151/06 LUKIN, STEVEN 4,01618 12/15/06 ZWIEG, SUSAN 1,829.92 121/15/06 DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT 29339 12/15/06 AHL, R. CHARLES 4,500.69 12/15/06 KNUTSON, LOIS 1,570.95 12/15/06 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 3,059.51 12/15/06 NIVEN, AMY 1,258.02 12/15/06 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 2,601.26 12/151/06 BRINK, TROY 1,822.15 12/15/06 BUCKLEY. BRENT 1.491.75 121/15/06 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 1,901.35 12/15/06 EDGE, DOUGLAS 1,893.35 12/15/06 FREBERG, RONALD 1,940.28 12/15/06 JONES, DONALD 1,893.35 12/15/06 MEYER, GERALD 1,969.79 12/15/06 NAGEL, BRYAN 2,486.01 12/151/06 OSWALD, ERICK 2,080.46 12/15/06 RUNNING, ROBERT 1,902.96 121/15/06 TEVLIN, TODD 1,830.15 12/15/06 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,414.86 21 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK 4 CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 121/15/06 ENGSTROM, ANDREW 1,776.55 12115/06 ISAKSON, CHAD 245.91 12/15106 JACOBSON, SCOTT 288.20 12/15!06 JAROSCH, JONATHAN 2,030.15 12/15/06 KUMMER, STEVEN 2,338.20 12115106 LABEREE, ERIN 2,882.35 12/151/06 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,414.86 12/15/06 MEINHOLZ, WILLIAM 190.96 121/15/06 PECK, DENNIS 2,421.80 12/15/06 SCHREMPP, ANTHONY 97.12 12/15/06 THOMPSON, MICHAEL 2,202.73 12/15/06 ANDERSON, BRUCE 4,184.27 12/15/06 CAREY, HEIDI 2,179.79 12/15/06 HALL, KATHLEEN 1,820.28 12/151/06 MARUSKA, MARK 2,754.63 12/15/06 NAUGHTON, JOHN 2,005.30 121/15/06 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1,895.66 12/15/06 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 1,572.74 12/15/06 DEAVER, CHARLES 536.02 12/15/06 HAYMAN, JANET 1,029.45 12/15/06 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,330.27 12/15/06 NELSON, JEAN 1,039.61 12/151/06 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 2,060.55 12/15/06 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 3,244.10 121/15/06 KROLL, LISA 1,320.08 12/15/06 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE 1,009.18 12/15/06 SINDT, ANDREA 1,745.35 12/15/06 THOMPSON, DEBRA 670.95 12/15/06 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,61336 12/15/06 FINWALL, SHANK 2,542.27 12/151/06 ROBERTS, KENNETH 2,486.08 12/15/06 BRASH, JASON 1,544.55 121/15/06 CARVER, NICHOLAS 2,853.51 12/15/06 FISHER, DAVID 3,712.12 12/15/06 RICE, MICHAEL 2,110.95 12/15/06 SWAN, DAVID 2,214.15 12/15/06 WELLENS, MOLLY 1,209.21 12/15/06 WORK, ALICIA 216.94 12/151/06 LUKIN, ALISHA 72.00 12/15/06 MCBRIDE, PATRICK 60.00 121/15/06 OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN 560.26 12/15/06 ROBBINS, AUDRA 2,288.25 22 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK 4 CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 121/15/06 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 137.88 12115/06 STAPLES, PAULINE 3,028.21 12/15106 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS 2,854.34 12/15/06 UNDERHILL, KRISTEN 351.00 12/15/06 GERMAIN, DAVID 1,902.59 12115106 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 2,033.54 12/151/06 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 2,124.33 12/15/06 ANZALDI, MANDY 1,513.85 121/15/06 COLLINS, ASHLEY 132.00 12/15/06 CRAUrFORD - JR, RAYMOND 329.50 12/15/06 CROSSON, LINDA 2,782.65 12/15/06 EVANS, CHRISTINE 819.66 12/15/06 GRAF, MICHAEL 2,094.61 12/15/06 HER, CHONG 419.00 12/151/06 HOFMEISTER, MARY 789.12 12/15/06 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 517.28 121/15/06 SCHMIDT, RUSSELL 2,094.61 12/15/06 SCHULZE, BRIAN 863.86 12/15/06 TOLBERT, FRANCINE 138.50 12/15/06 BRENEMAN, NEIL 322.31 12/15/06 BRUSOE, CRISTINA 15038 12/15/06 BUCKLEY, BRITTANY 65.08 12/151/06 DUNN, RYAN 908.03 12/15/06 ERICKSON- CLARK, CAROL 47.50 121/15/06 EVANS, KRISTIN 87.80 12/15/06 FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA 37.50 12/15/06 FONTAINE, KIM 830.62 12/15/06 GREDVIG, ANDERS 278.09 12/15/06 HASSENSTAB. DENISE 44.70 12/15/06 HORWATH, RONALD 2,159.70 12/151/06 IRISH, GRACE 28.00 12/15/06 KOEHNEN, AMY 130.25 121/15/06 KOEHNEN, MARY 1,605.62 12/15/06 KROLL, MARK 267.75 12/15/06 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 573.83 12/15/06 MATHEWS, LEAH 101.55 12/15/06 PROESCH, ANDY 387.15 12/15/06 SMITH, ANN 78.80 12/151/06 TELLIN, SARAH 12510 12/15/06 TRUE, CAROLINE 79.20 121/15/06 TUPY, HEIDE 127.20 12/15/06 TUPY, MARCUS 270.11 23 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK 4 CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 121/15/06 WERNER, REBECCA 116.86 12/15/06 WOLFGRAM, MARY 66.65 12/15/06 GROPPOLI, LINDA 312.50 12/15/06 HOLMGREN, STEPHANIE 127.75 12/15/06 STEVENS, PATTI 111.75 12/15/06 BEHAN, JAMES 1,800.37 12/151/06 PATTERSON, ALBERT 1,149.24 12/15/06 PRINS, KELLY 1,046.82 121/15/06 REILLY, MICHAEL 1,706.95 12/15/06 SCHOENECKER, LEIGH 134.30 12/15/06 YANG, HUE 27.80 12/15/06 AICHELE, CRAIG 1,940.55 12/15/06 PRIEM, STEVEN 2,12935 12/15/06 WOEHRLE, MATTHEW 1,680.56 12/151/06 BERGO, CHAD 2,355.82 12/15/06 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 2,561.82 121/15/06 FRANZEN, NICHOLAS 2,331.80 1000628 12/15/06 LONGRIE, DIANA 452.00 1000629 12/15/06 JAHN, DAVID 1,817.78 1000630 12/15/06 MORIN, TROY 148.75 1000631 12/15/06 MATHEYS, ALANA 2,059.20 1000632 12/15/06 HANSEN, LORI 1,995.63 1000633 12/151/06 GENNOW, PAMELA 104.00 1000634 12/15/06 PALANK, MARY 1,679.66 1000635 121/15/06 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 1,85539 1000636 12/15/06 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 3,268.81 1000637 12/15/06 WELCHLIN, CABOT 2,537.23 1000638 12/15/06 BAUMAN, ANDREW 1,056.00 1000639 12/15/06 STELLA, JAMES 1,424.00 1000640 12/15/06 SVENDSEN, RUSTIN 31,065.60 1000641 12/151/06 EDSON, DAVID 2,250.53 1000642 12/15/06 HELEY, ROLAND 1,934.59 1000643 121/15/06 HINNENKAMP, GARY 2,214.83 1000644 12/15/06 LINDORFF, DENNIS 1,897.97 1000645 12/15/06 NOVAK, MICHAEL 2,083.87 1000646 12/15/06 ABRAHAMSON, TYLER 60.00 1000647 12/15/06 BERGER_ STEPHANIE 38038 1000648 12/15/06 BURNS, BETH 28.00 1000649 12/151/06 CORBETT, CAITLIN 19.50 1000650 12/15/06 DEGREE, AMANDA 96.25 1000651 121/15/06 GAVIN, BENJAMIN 31.50 1000652 12/15/06 GREEN, DANIEL 14.50 24 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK 4 CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 1000653 121/15/06 GREENER, DOUGLAS 48.00 1000654 12/15/06 HANNIGAN, BRADY 48.00 1000655 12/15/06 HANNIGAN, TYLER 42.00 1000656 12/15/06 HOLDER, MOLLY 92.00 1000657 12/15/06 JUETTNER, MICHAEL 40.50 1000658 12/15/06 KOHLMAN, JENNIFER 76.00 1000659 12/151/06 LINDA, KELLIE 426.00 1000660 12/15/06 LIUKONEN, MATTHEW 14.00 1000661 121/15/06 MALLET, AMANDA 15.00 1000662 12/15/06 MILTON, ZACHARY 31.50 1000663 12/15/06 MORRISETTE, WILLIAM 40.50 1000664 12/15/06 MORRISETTE, ZACHARY 31.50 1000665 12/15/06 NELSON, KIRSTEN 30.00 1000666 12/15/06 NICHOLS, SAMUEL 31.50 1000667 12/151/06 NICHOLSON, COLIN 40.50 1000668 12/15/06 OLSON, KRISTIN 104.00 1000669 121/15/06 ROBBINS, EMERALD 288.00 1000670 12/15/06 STACKPOLE, QUINN 39.00 1000671 12/15/06 HAAG, MARK 1,926.62 1000672 12/15/06 NADEAU, EDWARD 3,061.98 1000673 12/15/06 GLASS, JEAN 1.868.83 1000674 12/15/06 NAGEL, BROOKE 270.30 1000675 12/151/06 SIMPSON, JOSEPH 194.25 1000676 12/15/06 ALBRECHT, TIMOTHY 39.88 1000677 121/15/06 AMUNDSON, ERIC 9938 1000678 12/15/06 ANDERSON, JOSHUA 92.30 1000679 12/15/06 ANDERSON, JUSTIN 85.20 1000680 12/15/06 BENJAMIN, AYLA 61.75 1000681 12/15/06 BRENEMAN, SEAN 35.70 1000682 12/15/06 BRUSOE, AMY 39.50 1000683 12/151/06 CHASTAN, ADAM 48.75 1000684 12/15/06 CLARK, PAMELA 124.95 1000685 121/15/06 COSTA, JOSEPH 132.20 1000686 12/15/06 DEMPSEY, BETH 147.00 1000687 12/15/06 FENGER, JUSTIN 317.98 1000688 12/15/06 GIEL. NICOLE 56.00 1000689 12/15/06 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 399.49 1000690 12/15/06 HERRON, ADAM 101.25 1000691 12/151/06 IRISH, PETER 58.50 1000692 12/15/06 JOHNSON, JAMES 69.50 1000693 121/15/06 LEMAY, KATHERINE 15416 1000694 12/15/06 PEHOSKI, JOEL 33.90 25 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK 4 CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 1000695 121/15/06 RICHTER, DANIEL 51.00 1000696 12115/06 RICHTER, NANCY 284.00 1000697 12/15106 RYAN, ERICA 72.80 1000698 12/15/06 SAUCERMAN, MICHAEL 472.88 1000699 12/15/06 SCHMIDT, EMILY 13790 1000700 12115106 SCHMIDT, JOHN 97.50 1000701 12/151/06 SCHRAMM, BRITTANY 97.70 1000702 12/15/06 SCHREINER, MICHELLE 267.53 1000703 121/15/06 SCHUNEMAN, GREGORY 19.50 1000704 12/15/06 SMITLEY, SHARON 452.70 1000705 12/15/06 STAHNKE, AMY 58.80 1000706 12/15/06 WARNER, CAROLYN 326.95 1000707 12/15/06 WEDES, CAROL 98.00 1000708 12/15/06 WHITE, NICOLE 454.93 1000709 12/151/06 WILLIAMS, KRISTINE 46.70 1000710 12/15/06 WOODMAN, ALICE 138.00 1000711 121/15/06 ZALK, IDA 42.25 1000712 12/15/06 BOSLEY, CAROL 347.48 1000713 12/15/06 LEWIS, AMY 98.05 1000714 12/15/06 ODDEN, JESSICA 37.75 1000715 12/15/06 OIE, REBECCA 9737 1000716 12/15/06 PARAYNO, GUAI 239.63 1000717 12/151/06 STODGHILL, AMANDA 40.50 1000718 12/15/06 VAN HALE, PAULA 87.15 1000719 121/15/06 ZAGER, LINNEA 28.50 1000720 12/15/06 BERLIN, SARAH 350.03 1000721 12/15/06 BIRKHOLZ, TYLER 107.73 1000722 12/15/06 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,116.60 1000723 12/15/06 EVERSON, KYLE 26.60 1000724 12/15/06 GADOW, ANNA 98.36 1000725 12/151/06 HER, CHEE 98.43 1000726 12/15/06 HER, PETER 50.80 1000727 121/15/06 O'GRADY, VICTORIA 85.90 1000728 12/15/06 SCHULZE, KEVIN 43.23 1000729 12/15/06 VANG, KAY 85.20 1000730 12/15/06 VANG, TIM 64.75 1000731 12/15/06 VUE, LOR PAO 378.78 482,71132 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 12/29106 CAVE, REBECCA 397.80 12/29106 HJELLE, ERIK 397.80 12129106 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 397.80 12/29106 ROSSBACH, WILLIAM 397.80 12/29106 COPELAND, EUGENE 3,090.00 12/29106 RYDEL, HARRIET 1,679.60 12/29106 FARR, LARRY 1,912.50 12/29106 SWANSON, LYLE 1,747.90 12/29106 ARNOLD, AJLA 294.00 12/29106 RAMEAUX, THERESE 2,782.38 12/29106 SCHMIDT, DEBORAH 1,647.75 12/29106 ANDERSON, CAROLE 1,122.47 12/29106 BAUMAN, GAYLE 3,898.35 12/29106 DEBILZAN, JUDY 810.00 12/29106 JACKSON, MARY 1,873.35 12/29106 KELSEY, CONNIE 1,054.59 12/29106 TETZLAFF, JUDY 1,873.35 12/29106 FRY, PATRICIA 1,856.07 12/29106 GUILFOILE, KAREN 3,064.74 12/29106 MORSON, JOHN 255.36 12/29106 SPANGLER, EDNA 1,049.13 12/29106 ANDERSON, SUZANNE 858.00 12/29106 JAGOE, CAROL 1,790.38 12/29106 KELLY, LISA 1,140.12 12/29106 MECHELKE, SHERRIE 1,133.93 12/29106 MOY, PAMELA 960.76 12/29106 OSTER, ANDREA 1,828.82 12/29106 WEAVER, KRISTINE 1,924.83 12/29106 BANICK, JOHN 4,017.82 12/29106 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,685.35 12/29106 POWELL, PHILIP 2,394.54 12/29106 RICHIE, CAROLE 1,704.67 12/29106 THOMALLA, DAVID 4,429.00 12/29106 ABEL, CLINT 2,488.40 12/29106 ALDRIDGE, MARK 2,974.57 12/29106 ANDREWS, SCOTT 3,847.06 12/29106 BAKKE, LONN 3,019.61 12/29106 BARTZ, PAUL 3,547.22 12/29106 BELDE, STANLEY 2,862.07 12/29106 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 2,664.98 MA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 12129106 BOHL, JOHN 3,042.34 12129106 BUSACK, DANIEL 2,400.11 12129106 COFFEY, KEVIN 2,510.47 12129106 GROTTY, KERRY 3,171.76 12129106 DOBLAR, RICHARD 4,320.30 12129106 GABRIEL, ANTHONY 2,461.54 12129106 HEINZ, STEPHEN 3,249.56 12129106 HIEBERT, STEVEN 3,447.07 12129106 JOHNSON, KEVIN 4,341.14 12129106 KALKA, THOMAS 686.28 12129106 KAKIS, FLINT 3,652.85 12129106 KONG, TOMMY 2,488.40 12129106 KROLL, BRETT 2,400.11 12129106 KVAM, DAVID 3,523.42 12129106 LANGNER, TODD 1,900.18 12129106 LARSON, DANIEL 2,400.11 12129106 LU, JOHNNIE 2,642.91 12129106 MARINO, JASON 2,400.11 12129106 MARTIN, DANIEL 654.68 12129106 MARTIN, JERROLD 2,514.38 12129106 MCCARTY, GLEN 2,513.83 12129106 METRY, ALESIA 2,587.73 12129106 NYE, MICHAEL 2,344.04 12129106 OLSON, JULIE 2,753.27 12129106 RABBETT, KEVIN 3,587.70 12129106 RHUDE, MATTHEW 2,045.85 12129106 STEFFEN, SCOTT 3,519.21 12129106 STEINER, JOSEPH 1,705.93 12129106 SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM 1,934.45 12129106 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 2,864.20 12129106 IRAN, JOSEPH 2,406.55 12129106 WENZEL, JAY 2,797.42 12129106 XIONG, KAO 2,499.44 12129106 BERGERON, JOSEPH 4,030.51 12129106 DUGAS, MICHAEL 2,514.38 12129106 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 2,629.80 12129106 FLOR, TIMOTHY 3,088.64 12129106 FRASER, JOHN 2,820.33 12129106 LANGNER, SCOTT 2,445.82 12129106 PALMA, STEVEN 3,221.37 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 12129106 THEISEN, PAUL 2,535.82 12129106 THIENES, PAUL 2,628.65 12129106 BARTA, JEREMY 2,598.13 12129106 DAWSON, RICHARD 2,401.28 12129106 DUELLMAN, KIRK 2,619.03 12129106 EVERSON, PAUL 3,147.22 12129106 HALWEG, JODI 1,991.84 12129106 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS 2,452.60 12129106 NOVAK, JEROME 1,679.16 12129106 PARSONS, KURT 2,337.56 12129106 PETERSON, ROBERT 2,492.12 12129106 PRECHTEL, ROBERT 2,401.76 12129106 SVENDSEN, RONALD 2,384.32 12129106 GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE 2,868.34 12129106 BAUER, MICHELLE 2,374.67 12129106 BURAU, JAMES 1,525.87 12129106 FLAUGHER, JAYME 1,931.76 12129106 HERMANSON, CHAD 1,980.75 12129106 HUBIN, KENNARD 2,112.45 12129106 KNAPP, BRETT 1,695.90 12129106 LINN, BRYAN 2,228.18 12129106 PACOLT, MARSHA 2,529.68 12129106 RABINE, JANET 1,917.35 12129106 STAHNKE, JULIE 1,922.15 12129106 LUKIN, STEVEN 4,016.18 12129106 ZWIEG, SUSAN 2,012.19 12129106 DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT 293.39 12129106 AHL, R. CHARLES 4,500.69 12129106 KNUTSON, LOIS 1,570.95 12129106 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 3,059.51 12129106 NIVEN, AMY 1,258.02 12129106 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 2,601.26 12129106 BRINK, TROY 1,905.40 12129106 BUCKLEY, BRENT 1,559.53 12129106 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 2,037.68 12129106 EDGE, DOUGLAS 1,979.95 12129106 FREBERG, RONALD 1,932.28 12129106 JONES, DONALD 2,027.48 12129106 MEYER, GERALD 1,969.80 12129106 NAGEL, BRYAN 2,486.01 29 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 12129106 OSWALD, ERICK 2,573.61 12129106 RUNNING, ROBERT 2,099.81 12129106 TEVLIN, TODD 1,922.05 12129106 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,414.86 12129106 ENGSTROM, ANDREW 1,776.56 12129106 ISAKSON, CHAD 315.25 12129106 JACOBSON, SCOTT 1,457.25 12129106 JAROSCH, JONATHAN 2,147.95 12129106 KUMMER, STEVEN 2,366.80 12129106 LABEREE, ERIN 2,882.35 12129106 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,858.56 12129106 PECK, DENNIS 2,466.16 12129106 SCHREMPP, ANTHONY 145.68 12129106 THOMPSON, MICHAEL 2,234.15 12129106 ANDERSON, BRUCE 4,184.27 12129106 CAREY, HEIDI 2,179.78 12129106 HALL, KATHLEEN 1,820.28 12129106 MARUSKA, MARK 2,754.63 12129106 NAUGHTON, JOHN 1,822.15 12129106 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1,895.66 12129106 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 1,526.20 12129106 DEAVER, CHARLES 642.15 12129106 GERNES, CAROLE 22.50 12129106 HAYMAN, JANET 1,054.39 12129106 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,330.27 12129106 NELSON, JEAN 1,034.50 12129106 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 2,060.55 12129106 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 3,244.09 12129106 KROLL, LISA 1,359.84 12129106 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE 1,009.19 12129106 SINDT, ANDREA 1,745.35 12129106 THOMPSON, DEBRA 670.94 12129106 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,613.35 12129106 FINWALL, SHANN 2,564.23 12129106 ROBERTS, KENNETH 3,034.58 12129106 BRASH, JASON 1,544.56 12129106 CARVER, NICHOLAS 2,853.51 12129106 FISHER, DAVID 3,712.13 12129106 RICE, MICHAEL 2,110.95 12129106 SWAN, DAVID 2,254.80 ME CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 12129106 WELLENS, MOLLY 1,268.28 12129106 BJORK, ALICIA 131.63 12129106 MCBRIDE, PATRICK 60.00 12129106 OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN 435.38 12129106 ROBBINS, AUDRA 2,288.25 12129106 STAPLES, PAULINE 3,028.20 12129106 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS 2,854.34 12129106 UNDERHILL, KRISTEN 459.00 12129106 GERMAIN, DAVID 1,902.59 12129106 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 1,956.85 12129106 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 2,122.60 12129106 ANZALDI, MALADY 1,475.55 12129106 COLLINS, ASHLEY 90.75 12129106 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND 298.00 12129106 CROSSON, LINDA 2,782.65 12129106 EVANS, CHRISTINE 824.00 12129106 GRAF, MICHAEL 2,094.61 12129106 HER, CHONG 476.00 12129106 HOFMEISTER, MARY 729.99 12129106 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 562.89 12129106 SCHMIDT, RUSSELL 2,094.61 12129106 SCHULZE, BRIAN 900.44 12129106 TOLBERT, FRANCINE 222.50 12129106 BRENEMAN, NEIL 401.98 12129106 BRUSOE, CRISTINA 143.00 12129106 BUCKLEY, BRITTANY 68.50 12129106 DUNN, RYAN 680.48 12129106 ERICKSON- CLARK, CAROL 47.50 12129106 EVANS, KRISTIN 175.60 12129106 FONTAINE, KIM 792.98 12129106 GREDVIG, ANDERS 510.79 12129106 GUZIK, JENNIFER 88.00 12129106 HASSENSTAB, DENISE 44.70 12129106 HORWATH, RONALD 2,159.70 12129106 IRISH, GRACE 28.00 12129106 IRISH, PETER 117.00 12129106 KOEHNEN, AMY 78.15 12129106 KOEHNEN, MARY 1,391.90 12129106 KROLL, MARK 348.50 12129106 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 391.99 31 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE 1000746 1000747 1000748 1000749 1000750 1000751 1000752 1000753 1000754 1000755 1000756 1000757 1000758 1000759 1000760 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 12129106 EMPLOYEE NAME MATHEWS, LEAH PROESCH, ANDY SMITH, ANN TELLIN, SARAH TRUE, CAROLINE TUPY, HEIDE TUPY, MARCUS WERNER, REBECCA WOLFGRAM, MARY GROPPOLI, LINDA HER, SHILLAME HOLMGREN, STEPHANIE STEVENS, PATTI BEHAN, JAMES PATTERSON,ALBERT PRINS, KELLY REILLY, MICHAEL SCHOENECKER, LEIGH VANE, HUE AICHELE, CRAIG PRIEM, STEVEN WOEHRLE, MATTHEW BERGO,CHAD FOWLDS, MYCHAL FRANZEN, NICHOLAS LONGRIE, DIANA JAHN, DAVID MORIN, TROY MATHEYS, ALANA HANSEN, LORI GENNOW, PAMELA PALANK, MARY SVENDSEN, JOANNE SHORTREED, MICHAEL WELCHLIN, CABOT BAUMAN, ANDREW STELLA, JAMES SVENDSEN, RUSTIN EDSON, DAVID HELEY, ROLAND AMOUNT 69.83 245.57 118.20 36.49 66.00 169.60 341.78 132.15 71.93 352.50 156.83 120.75 216.05 1,769.23 1,149.25 1,046.82 1,706.95 45.40 145.95 1,949.19 2,324.65 1,787.82 2,355.82 2,561.82 2,493.90 452.00 1,638.86 165.75 2,059.18 1,924.58 406.25 1,697.86 1,855.40 3,268.81 2,980.98 464.00 1,248.00 3,406.91 1,932.28 1,934.59 32 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 1000761 12129106 HINNENKAMP, GARY 1,911.71 1000762 12129106 LINDORFF, DENNIS 1,897.97 1000763 12129106 NOVAK, MICHAEL 1,893.35 1000764 12129106 ABRAHAMSON, TYLER 30.00 1000765 12129106 BERGER, STEPHANIE 342.13 1000766 12129106 BURNS, BETH 21.00 1000767 12129106 CHEZIK, CARLEY 74.25 1000768 12129106 CORBETT, CAITLIN 45.50 1000769 12129106 DAHL, SAMUEL 33.00 1000770 12129106 DANIELS, ALYSHIA 30.00 1000771 12129106 DANIELS, DANIELLE 33.00 1000772 12129106 DEGREE, AMANDA 91.88 1000773 12129106 DOTAS, ANDREW 52.00 1000774 12129106 DOTAS, KENT 120.00 1000775 12129106 DOTAS, ROCHELLE 80.00 1000776 12129106 GAVIN, BENJAMIN 43.00 1000777 12129106 GREEN, DANIEL 72.50 1000778 12129106 GREENER, DOUGLAS 96.00 1000779 12129106 HOLDER, MOLLY 69.00 1000780 12129106 JACKSON, ANGIE 70.00 1000781 12129106 JACKSON, CHRISTOPHER 39.00 1000782 12129106 JACKSON, HANNAH 60.00 1000783 12129106 JUETTNER, MICHAEL 40.50 1000784 12129106 KLEIN, AARON 90.00 1000785 12129106 KLEM, JOSH 288.00 1000786 12129106 KOHLMAN, JENNIFER 108.00 1000787 12129106 LANCETTE, JOSHUA 88.00 1000788 12129106 LINDA, KELLIE 352.00 1000789 12129106 MALLET, AMANDA 71.25 1000790 12129106 MILTON, ZACHARY 43.00 1000791 12129106 MOBLEY, CAROLYN 30.00 1000792 12129106 MORRISETTE, WILLIAM 27.00 1000793 12129106 MORRISETTE, ZACHARY 21.50 1000794 12129106 NELSON, KIRSTEN 60.00 1000795 12129106 NICHOLS, SAMUEL 73.50 1000796 12129106 NICHOLSON, COLIN 60.75 1000797 12129106 ROBBINS, EMERALD 378.00 1000798 12129106 ROELLER, MICHAEL 73.50 1000799 12129106 SIKORA, PAUL 51.00 1000800 12129106 STACKPOLE, QUINN 52.00 33 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 1000801 12129106 TARR -JR, GUS 102.00 1000802 12129106 YORKOVICH, JENNA 22.50 1000803 12129106 ZIELINSKI, JESSICA 24.00 1000804 12129106 HAAG, MARK 3,183.98 1000805 12129106 NADEAU, EDWARD 3,061.98 1000806 12129106 GLASS, JEAN 1,868.83 1000807 12129106 NAGEL, BROOKE 286.20 1000808 12129106 SIMPSON, JOSEPH 122.05 1000809 12129106 VELASQUEZ, ANGELA 153.00 1000810 12129106 ANDERSON, JOSHUA 39.05 1000811 12129106 ANDERSON, JUSTIN 88.75 1000812 12129106 BENJAMIN, AYLA 65.00 1000813 12129106 BRUSOE, AMY 26.00 1000814 12129106 CHASTAN, ADAM 39.00 1000815 12129106 CLARK, PAMELA 71.40 1000816 12129106 COSTA, JOSEPH 237.80 1000817 12129106 DEMPSEY, BETH 147.00 1000818 12129106 FENGER, JUSTIN 234.38 1000819 12129106 GIEL, NICOLE 42.00 1000820 12129106 GRANT, MELISSA 157.35 1000821 12129106 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 428.55 1000822 12129106 HERRON, ADAM 111.38 1000823 12129106 JOHNSON, JAMES 69.50 1000824 12129106 LEMAY, KATHERINE 65.08 1000825 12129106 MCMAHON, MELISSA 111.23 1000826 12129106 NWANOKWALE, MORDY 20.25 1000827 12129106 RICHTER, DANIEL 51.00 1000828 12129106 RICHTER, NANCY 301.75 1000829 12129106 SAUCERMAN, MICHAEL 203.44 1000830 12129106 SCHMIDT, EMILY 78.80 1000831 12129106 SCHMIDT, JOHN 78.00 1000832 12129106 SCHRAMM, BRITTANY 97.40 1000833 12129106 SCHREINER, MICHELLE 183.01 1000834 12129106 SMITLEY, SHARON 452.70 1000835 12129106 TAYLOR, JASON 48.94 1000836 12129106 TRUE, ANDREW 35.80 1000837 12129106 WARNER, CAROLYN 301.80 1000838 12129106 WEDES, CARYL 112.50 1000839 12129106 WHITE, NICOLE 451.63 1000840 12129106 WOODMAN, ALICE 115.00 34 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 1000841 12129106 ZALK, IDA 45.50 1000842 12129106 BOSLEY, CAROL 344.65 1000843 12129106 KELLY, MICHAEL 84.00 1000844 12129106 LEWIS, AMY 122.10 1000845 12129106 ODDEN, JESSICA 24.54 1000846 12129106 OIE, REBECCA 90.79 1000847 12129106 PARAYNO, GUAI 261.95 1000848 12129106 SATTLER, CASSANDRA 33.83 1000849 12129106 SATTLER, MELINDA 41.40 1000850 12129106 STODGHILL, 47.25 1000851 12129106 VAN HALE, PAULA 33.20 1000852 12129106 ZAGER, LINNEA 48.90 1000853 12129106 BERLIN, SARAH 343.43 1000854 12129106 BIRKHOLZ, TYLER 107.73 1000855 12129106 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,116.60 1000856 12129106 GADOW, ANNA 236.28 1000857 12129106 HER, GHEE 57.15 1000858 12129106 HER, PETER 57.15 1000859 12129106 O'GRADY, VICTORIA 25.20 1000860 12129106 SCHULZE, KEVIN 53.20 1000861 12129106 VANG, KAY 99.40 1000862 12129106 VANG, TIM 75.85 1000863 12129106 VUE, LOR PAO 243.25 463,360.34 35 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager Greg Copeland From: Chief of Police David J. Th0nna|ka 8VbieC1: 200Y Animal Control Contract Date: December 28 Introduction Agenda Item 12 City Council approval is required h3 8vvand the 2007 contract for animal Cnntn]| services. For the past several years, the City of Maplewood has contracted with Animal Control Services, Inc., for animal control services. These services include answering calls for service, impounding stray animals, investigating cases of animal abuse/neglect, following up on dog/cat and kennel licenses, investigating cases involving dangerous dogs, and education programs for pet owners. Animal Control Services, |nc,has always provided reliable, professional service and shown that they are willing to work with the City to continue to provide the best service possible. The only changes from the 2006 contract are a slight increase in the two boarding fees and the patrol fee if fuel prices increase beyond $3.50 per gallon (the changes are marked with an asterisk below): Patrol (Per Hour) Unscheduled After-Hours C8U0ut1 (Per Hour) Unscheduled After-Hours CGUOUt2 (Per Hour) Unscheduled After-Hours CaUOUL3 (Per Hour) Unscheduled After-Hours CoUOut4 (Per Hour4Nknd/Ho|\ Boarding Bv City Direction/Ordinance (Per Day) Boarding Paid By Animal Owner (Per Day) Patrol Fee Increase |f Fuel Prices Increase Beyond $58.00 $68.00 $53.00 $63.00 $68.00 $78.00 $14.00 $10.25 $ 3.00/GaUon $27.90 $48.00(}-9p.0.) $58.00 (9 p.m.-Mid.) $08.00 (K8id,7 8.nn.) $53.00 (7 a.m.-6 p.m $63.00 (6-9 p.nn] $68.00 (S p.nn,K4id] $78.0O(PWid.-78.nl.) $14.5O $1Y.00* $ 3.50/GoUon° This contract has been submitted to the City Attorney for review and approval. Recommendation It is nmSOnlDlended that the City Council accept the 2007 contract from /\ninn8| Control GeniSRS. Inc. Action Required Submit to the City Council for review and action. 0JTj ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRACT This agreement made this day of Month of 2007, by and between Animal Control Services, Inc. a Minnesota Corporation, located at 6400 Colfax Ave North Brooklyn Center Minnesota. Hereinafter, referred to as "ASCI", and the "City" of Maplewood located in the County of Ramsey, and the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "City", witness to: In consideration of the covenants and agreements, hereinafter set forth, it is mutually agreed by and between the parties, hereto, as follows. 1. This agreement will be effective as of January 1, 2007 and will continue in effect until December 31, 2007, unless canceled, pursuant to Paragraph 15. 2. "ACSI" agrees to patrol the public streets of the "City" in a vehicle specially designed for the transportation of small animals, in accordance with City Ordinances and a schedule agreed upon by both parties, If such schedule is not agreed upon, the agreement shall be null or void. The vehicle shall have proper identification displayed on two sides. "ACSI" further agrees to insure, service, and maintain said equipment. 3, "ASCI" agrees that competent personnel, trained in the handling of animals, shall do patrolling. Said employees shall perform their duties only while in proper uniform and shall have with them, at all times while on patrol, proper identification as to indicate employee's name, title, and place of employment. The two employees who will perform the duties of Animal Control Officer are Richard Ruzicka, Mike Buckman and Joel Metcalf. 4, The "City" shall authorize "ACSI" to apprehend and retain dogs, cats and /or issue citation tags for violations of the "City" Ordinances, However, "ACSI" will not invade the private property contrary to the wishes of the owner of said property nor forcibly take an animal from any person without the approval and assistance of the Maplewood Police Department of the "City" 5, In addition to the regular hours of'patrolling referred to, "ACSI" agrees to maintain one (1) vehicle for standby service to attend to cases outside regular patrol hours at the specific request of the Maplewood Police Department "ACSI" shall respond immediately to any after hours' callout, agreed upon by the "City" of Maplewood and confirmed to be an emergency. 6. "ACSI" represents and agrees that all animals impounded shall be kept at WHITE BEAR KENNEL, 1283 HAMMOND ROAD, WHITE BEAR TOWNSHIP, MN. "ACSI" agrees and warrants that all animals impounded shall be kept in a comfortable and humane manner for a period required by the "City" Ordinance, It is mutually agreed upon that "ACSI" may temporarily board at an emergency facility if access and or treatment is not immediately available at the contract facility, Any fee differential for boarding an animal between the contracted facility and the facility in White Bear Township will be paid by the animal owner. If an animal is unclaimed, the "City" will pay the boarding cost at the contracted facility. The fee schedule(5) for any other facility to be used by "ACSI" shall be posted prominently At the White Bear Township facility and be given to the "City" for public information purposes. State law requires animals be held for a period of'5 days 24hrs periods this roles into a fraction of the days. 7. At the time that an animal impounded under this contract is reclaimed, "ACSI" or its agent shall collect the impounding fee and boarding charges as provided by "Contract".. All impounding fees and/or any other penalty fees collected by "ACSI" or its agent shall be remitted to the "ACSI ". All other fees collected by "ACSI" or its agents by request of the City shall be remitted to the "City." 8, In the event an animal impounded and boarded by order of the "City" Health Officer or placed under quarantine by ruling of the State Board of Health, said animal shall be boarded as required by said order or ruling. At the end of such period, the "City" shall release all of its interest, right and control over said animals that may then be disposed of at the discretion of "ACSI". In the event that any dogs, cats, or other impounded animals are unclaimed after six (6) days, they shall become the property of "ACSI" and may be disposed ofor sold at their discretion. All proceeds from the disposition of such animals may be retained by "ACSI" including any proceeds received from any animals disposed of in accordance to Minnesota Statutes 35.71. 9, The "City" shall furnish to "ACSI" any special forms or receipts specified in the "City" Ordinance and "ACSI" shall keep records of all animals impounded together with a description of the same. 10. "ACSI" shall assume liability for all harm to animals due to is negligence or that of its agents in not properly caring for the same, and agrees to defend the "City" against any lawsuits arising there from. "ACSI" shall defend, indemnify, mi , , and hold the "City" harmless including its officers, employees or agents fi - orn any and all claims, lawsuits, losses, damages, or expenses on account of bodily injuries, sickness, disease, death, and property damage including injury to animals. "ACSI" shall provide the "City" proof of public liability insurance including comprehensive automobile liability in an amount of at least $350,000.00 per each claimant and $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and E.O.0 insurance in the amount of $250.000 per occurrence. 11. The "City" agrees to pay "ACSI" for services in the performance of this contract as follows: A. Price per hour/per vehicle for scheduled patrol based on Fifteen (15) hours of patrol per week for actual time in service.Price per call — per vehicle for service during scheduled or regular working hours. $27.90 & After Hours Call-out unscheduled Special Callout 1 6:00 pin till 9:00 pin $4800 Special Callout 2 9:00 pin till Midnight $58,00 Special Callout 3 Midnight till 7:00 am $68,00 Special Callout 4 Weekends and Holidays 7:00am till 6:00prn $53.00 6:00pm till 9:00pm $63:00 9:00pra till Midnight $68,00 Might night till 7:00am $78.00 C. Price per animal — for each DAY or fraction thereof, for boarding any species of animals impounded by direction of' "City" officials or local Ordinance, $14,50 D. Price per animal for boarding each day or fraction there of for boarding and reclaimed by the owner this fee is not charged to the City only to the pet owner MTN E, Animal impoundment fee $13.00 (Paid by the animal owner upon reclaiming) F. Price per animal for disposal of'a cat G. Price per animal for disposal of a dog $21,00 $23.00 H, Kennel Vaccinations to stop Various Diseases from time to Time $3 ) .00 per shot (To be paid by animal owner if claimed, if not the City) L Boarding fee to keep Dead Domestic animals for reclaiming not to exceed the required (6) days. (To be paid by the animal owner if claimed, if not the City) $ 5.00 per day 12, "ACSI" reserves the right to increase fees for patrol hours if the possibility of future fuel prices increases beyond $3.50 per gallon. "ACSI" shall give written notice to the "City" showing the reason for the increase, 13. All payments shall be made by the "City", upon receipt of monthly statements by "ACSI". Invoices for services rendered will be due net 30 days from the date of invoice and will be subject to a 1.5% service charge on balance due each month. 14. "ACSI" agrees to provide emergency veterinary services to impounded animals as needed at cost to the "City"; however, veterinary service that was deemed necessary may be charged to the owner upon reclamation of the animal. The fee will be charged to the owner if the animal. If the animal owner is not known the fee will be charged to the City $80,00 15. "ACSI" agrees that during the period of this contract, it will not within the State of Minnesota, discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, sex, national origin, or ancestry and will include a similar provision in all subcontract(s) entered into for the performance, hereof This paragraph is inserted in the contract to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 181,59. 16. "ACSI" agree to comply with the Minnesota Data Practices Act and all other State and Federal laws relating to data privacy or confidentiality. "ACSI" agrees it will immediately report to the "City" any requests from third parties for information relating to the Agreement. 18, "ACSI" agrees to promptly respond to inquiries from the "City" of concerning data requests, 19. "ACSI" agrees to hold the "City", its officers, its agents, its department heads, its employees harmless from and claims resulting from the unlawful disclosure of the use of the data protection under State and Federal laws. 20,, "ACSI" agrees to abide by the requirements and regulations of the Americans with Disabilities Act 1990 (ADA) the Human Rights Act (Minnesota Chapters 363 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. These laws deal with discrimination based on race, gender, disability, religion, sexual preference, and sexual harassment. Violation of any of the above laws can lead to termination of this agreement. 21 Either party, hereto, may cancel this contract after Thirty (30) days written notice, thereof, to the other party, 22. Notices pursuant to this contract shall be given by deposit in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: a, To "AC I ": Mr. Richard L. Ruzicka, PRESIDENT Animal Control Services, Inc. 6400 Colfax Ave. No. Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 b. To "City" City Of Maplewood 1830 East County Rd B Maplewood Mn 55109 Alternatively, notices required by this contract may be personally delivered to the person's named above. Notice shall be deemed given as of the date of personal service or as of the date of deposit ofthe notice in the United States Mail. IN THE PRESENCE OF: INC. ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, BY: IN THE PRESENCE OF: MAPLEWOOD BY: DATE: Agenda Item 13 19 a 85 to] lowl' I a I bill & TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfbile, City Clerk RE: Permit Fee Waiver and Temporary Gambling Resolution DATE: January 3, 2007 Catherine Boehm, representing Carver Elementary PTO, has applied for a temporary gambling license to be used on March 31, 2007 from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. to conduct a raffle. The council waived the fee for the annual event. In conjunction with the raffle, Ms. Boehm has also completed miscellaneous permits for a carnival and for temporary food. The annual carnival and raffle will be conducted at the school located at 2680 Upper Afton Road on the aforementioned date and proceeds from the raffle will be used for programs for educational purposes. The school is requesting waiver of the associated fees which has been past practice for this particular event. BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the temporary premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the Carver Elementary PTO, 2680 Upper Afton Road, Maplewood, Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. Recommendation Approve the above resolution for temporary gambling and waive related fees as requested. Agenda Item 14 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: January 1, 2007 RE: Annual Lawful Gambling License — Hill Murray Mothers Club Intradiietion Hill Murray Mothers Club currently operates lawful gambling at 5-8 Tavern located at 2289 Minnehaha Avenue. They are requesting approval of an annual premise pen by approval of the following resolution. RESOLUTION BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for Hill Murray Mothers Club, to operate at 5-8 Tavern located at 2289 Minnehaha, Maplewood, Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. Recommendation It is recommended that council approve the lawful gambling resolution application for the Hill Murray Mothers Club to operate at 5-8 Tavern located at 2289 Minnehaha Avenue. Agenda Item 15 r AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer Ed Nadeau, Utility Superintendent SUBJECT: Approve Emergency Repair of Sanitary Sewer Main DATE: December 27, 2006 The sanitary sewer main line from Lift Station 6 on McKnight and Stillwater Road was in need of repair. This repair will exceed the ordinance allowed expenditure of $5,000. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city council approve the repair of the sanitary sewer at a cost of $5,706 to be paid to Ro-So Contracting, Inc. by Utility Superintendent Ed Nadeau. Attachments: 1. Invoice from Ro-So Contracting, Inc. City of Naplewood 1810 Countv Road 13 Maplewood MN 5510 DATE 10"31 -06 J OB IF 6-44 JOB NAME Repair 12" forcemain LOCATION McKnight Road & Stillwater QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT EXTENSION I — FA 12 X 10 PVC tee 465-00 465.00 1 EA 12" Ferneo Shear Ring w/ 10" bushing 180.00 180.00 5 FT 12" PVC C-900 2 3-00 115.00 4 EA Horseshoe blocks 14-00 56.00 9 EA Sand & Cemen 10.00 90.00 8 HRS Crew 600.00 Mono POPAL WTUNT OF ',IWZIK PERFO!�u V E D PO REPAIR PIPE AND REPLACH ARUP $57o6.00 Agenda Item 16 r_%�j AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer Bryan Nagel, Street Superintendent SUBJECT: Approve Purchase of Bobcat 5600 Turbo Work Machine/Tool Cat DATE: December 28, 2006 Council approval is required for expenditures exceeding $5,000.00. Background The Work Machine will assist us in meeting requirements of our NPIDES permit, enabling us to gain access to off road structures and water bodies that we are unable to access without rental equipment. The Work Machine will also be able to assist with winter plowing of sidewalks; it can operate all of our current plowing attachments. The Work Machine can also be utilized as a rear discharge lawn mower so that we are no longer side discharging our boulevards and center Islands into the streets/storm water systems. Budget Impact This is a 2007 capital outlay request for $39,600.00 under budget code 604-000-000-1540. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that council approve the purchase of the Work Machine/Tool Cat from Tri-State Bobcat Inc. under state contract #436808 for $39,478.13. Attachments: 1. Bobcat Product Quotation DE:v -29 -20 14 :34 TRI —STATE Z ODCAT ` Bobcat. P Quotation Quotation Number: WM -00830 Date: 12/29/2006 P. 01/01 Ship to Bobcat Dealer Bill To _�... — � City of Maplewood Tri State Bobcat Inc Attn: 1800 West Highway 13 1902 East County Road B Burnsville MN 55337 -2214 Maplewood, MN 55109 Phone: (952) 894 -0894 Phone: 651- 770 -4580 Fax: (952) 894 -5759 Fax: 651249 -2459 ----------------------"---- Contact: Bill Miller 1 Cellular: 612- 919 -1840 $3,565.75 E Mail: bill m@tristatebobcat.com Total of Items Quoted $36,865.25 Taxes: State of Minnesota $2,396.24 Ouote. Total - US dollars $39,261.49 Notes: Minnesota State Con tract #436808 All prices subject to change without prior notice or obligation. This price quote supercedes all preceeding price quotes. Customer must exerci his purchase option within 30 da from quote date Customer Acceptance: Authorized Signature: Print: Sign: Purchase Order: Date: TOTAL P.01 Part No Qty Price Ea. Total Description 7105550 1 $28,857.50 $28,857.50 5600 Turbo Work Machine 1 $3,565.75 $3,565.75 Factory Installed Cab Enclosure w /Heater & AC 7113226 71I399b 1 $1,411.00 $1,411.00 Deluxe Road Package High Flow Aux Hydraulics, 5600T 7105442 1 $500.00 $500.00 Dealer Installed Stereo with Headphones 27 X 10.5 -15, 10 PR, Turf Tire Assembly 7110346 4 $280.00 $1,120.00 Attachments 62" Dirt Bucket 6734233 1 $467.50 $467.50 Total of Items Quoted $36,865.25 Taxes: State of Minnesota $2,396.24 Ouote. Total - US dollars $39,261.49 Notes: Minnesota State Con tract #436808 All prices subject to change without prior notice or obligation. This price quote supercedes all preceeding price quotes. Customer must exerci his purchase option within 30 da from quote date Customer Acceptance: Authorized Signature: Print: Sign: Purchase Order: Date: TOTAL P.01 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles Ah[ Public Works Director/City Engineer DUW@VDe K0Dewk0.EDVirOD0eDt@l Manager Bill Priefe[ Public Works Operations Analyst SUBJECT: Approve Arbor Day Proclamation DATE: December 28, 2006 INTRODUCTION Agenda Item 17 The National Arbor Day Foundation in cooperation with the U.S. Forest Service and the National Association Vf State Foresters recognizes towns and cities across America that meet the standards ofthe TREE QTY USA pn}gnSnn. The City OfMaplewood vvVU|d like to be recognized as 8 participant in the TREE CITY USA program. TREE CITY USA recognition can make a strong contribution to our city's pride, and it will put us in touch with other communities and resources that can help us improve our program and help with Obtaining grants. DISCUSSION Many Vf the trees in8 typical city are Vn public property whether they are boulevard trees, |n parks 0rin k8op|evvOOd'S case, in our abundant open space. The TREE CITY USA program is designed horecognize COnnnnUniti8S that effectively manage their public tree r8soUnC8S and to encourage the innp|8nn8nL8UOn of community tree management based On four TREE CITY USA standards. The four standards provide structure for 8 community forestry pn00[8nl. [8qUin8 the City's pnOgr8[n to d8OlOnStrGtR SuCC8SS based OO the jUdQnn8nL of the State Forester's office, and provide for an Gvv8pen8GG and appreciation of trees among the residents of the c0nnnnVniLy. The four TREE CITY USA standards are: Standard 1:A Tree Board or Department A tree board is a group of concerned citizens, usually volunteer, charged by ordinance to develop and administer a comprehensive community tree management program for the care of trees Vn public property. Tree boards usually function with the aid Of professional foresters. The formation of seven member ad- hoc Environmental Committee was approved by the City of Maplewood council on January 26, 2004. Subsequently on September 11, 2006, the Environmental Committee was given full commission status by ordinance and renamed the Environmental and Natural Resources Commission. The Commission iSaided by the City's EnvinJnnn8nC8| Manager and the City Forester. Standard 2: A Community Tree Ordinance The ordinance should determine public tree care policies for planting, maintenance, and removals. The City of Maplewood adopted by ordinance the Environmental Preservation and Protection of Trees and Woodlands Ordinance On September 11.2000 which fulfills this standard. Standard 3: A Community Forestry Program with am Annual Budget mf at least $2 per capita The City ofMao|evvo0d's per capita expenditures for its forestry program are $2.24 per capita. Standard 4: An Arbor Day Observance and Proclamation The City Of Maplewood held oD Arbor Day observance ot the Maplewood Nature Center OO April 29.2008 as we have done for several years. A presentation on the value of trees was given by a member of the Environmental and Natural Resources Commission as well as a presentation by our City Forester on Dutch Elm disease and other tree diseases. A large Northern White Cedar tree was planted and Red and Sugar Maple seedlings were given away tO all participants. Although vve did publicize and promote the Arbor Day celebration, we did not formally issue a proclamation by our Mayor in 2006, but is hereby recommending adoption OfGO Official City Proclamation Arbor Day, April 27.2OO7 RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item 17 It is recommended that council approve the attached Arbor Day proclamation so that the City of Maplewood has met the four standards required of a community in order to be considered a participant in the TREE CITY USA program. Attachments: 1. Arbor Day Proclamation Arbor Da P roc l ama t ion . N/hHme8O |n1O72.J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees, and N/hHme8O this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and N/hHme8O Arbor Day iS now observed throughout the nation and the world, and kNh8re88 the [|dv of K88pkevvVod. K8inneS0L8 n8nn8d for the nn|Qhb/ and maj K88p|8 tree, is CR|ebn8LinQ its 50 Anniversary as 8 City in2007. and Whereas Maplewood wishes bJ join the over sixty Tree USA cities in Minnesota and Whereas, the people of Maplewood, Minnesota who initiated the statewide movement for the purchase of Open Space by voting upon themselves a property tax levy in 1993 to acquire 308 acres [f property all holding 8 vast store o[ trees, and natural beauty, and Whereas, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce life-giving oxygen, and provide habitat for wildlife, and kNh8re88 trees are 8 renewable resource giving Vs paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires, and beautify our community, and kNh8re88 trees in our city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community, and kNh8re88 trees, wherever they are planted, are 8 source of joy and spiritual renewal. Now, Therefore, 1, Diana Longrie, Mayor of the City of Maplewood, do hereby proclaim April 27, 2007 as Arbor ��Y | the (�Uv��K8 k�vvO�d d | U ��U�8 k} celebrate Day d LV ���� n 8 -, Maplewood, UpQ88 citizens 8 r-_, 8n support efforts to protect our trees and woodlands, and Further, I urge all citizens to plant trees to gladden the heart and promote the well-being of this and future generations. Dated this day of Mayor Signature Agenda Item 18 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles /\hi Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Gladstone North Area Streets, City Project 04-15, Approve Settlement with Gene Shursen at 1816 Kennard Street for Flooding Damage DATE: January 2, 2007 INTRODUCTION A settlement iS proposed for 8 driveway reconstruction issue that has been around since 2004. The claimant is willing to settle for $13,000. Approval of the settlement agreement is recommended. Background |n2O04, the city administered and designed the replacement Vf the driveway ak1812 Kennard Street. The driveway was immediately adjacent to property owned by Eugene Shursen at 1816 Kennard Street. The n8vv|y reconstructed driveway did not drain correctly and C8Ua8d damage hJ@ retaining vv8|| nODSt[uCt9d by Mr. ShVrSen and damaged G portion ofMr. ShVrs8n'sb8S8rnenL The extent of the damage and 8n agreement as to the appropriate amount of compensation has been debated for 2 years. The League nf Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust /LK8COD has investigated 8nddeLennin8dih8iCOv8r8Q8 of the basement from damage is approximately $6,000 (the final amount needs to be confirmed with a second estimate). An engineering analysis bySEM (copy attached) recommended repairs [f $5,000 from the city project bUdgeL The original total recommended funds by staff and LW1C|T has been $11 ($8.000 +$5.000). Mr. Shursen believes that he has costs in excess of $20,694 based on the following: Retaining wall repair (wood) $ 7,189 Basement repair $12,500 Door repair g 725 Water removal Total {||8|m $20.894 The reason that the claim settlement has not considered the full reimbursement for Mr. Shursen's damages iS that 8 waiver form (copy attached) was signed bv Mr. ShU[SeD. The City has GDobligation/responsibility for the correction Of the drainage ($5 and the LK8C|lF has agreed that insurance should cover $8.00O. The proposed settlement iG8t$13.O0U. The issue iG whether the City should settle for this additional $2 The LK8C|li3 not willing tO pay this final $2.U00. Staff recommends settling this claim ot$13 Budget Impact The project 04-15iSCum8n8vSigOhhC8nflyuOd8rbudo8tby$338,148. The original $5 bR covered under this budget. The $8 claim from Lk8C|T will b9 covered byclaims. |tiS proposed that the remaining $2,000 to settle this claim also come from the project budget. his recommended that council approve the attached settlement agreement with Eugene Shursenat181S Kennard Street in the amount of $13,000 for drainage damage from Project 04-15 funds. Attachments: 1. Settlement Agreemen 2. Waiver form from 1812 Kennard Street I ScH Engineering Letter RELEASE That Eugene Shursen of 1816 Kennard Street, Maplewood, Minnesota for the sole consideration of thirteen thousand dollars, ($13,000.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, releases and discharges forever the City of Maplewood and the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, their agents and servants, and all other persons, associations and corporations, including their successors and assigns, from any and all actions, claims and demands including claims for contribution and/or indemnity of whatever nature arising out of an accident, casualty or occurrence which happened since driveway reconstruction as part of the neighborhood street reconstruction program in 2004, at or near 1816 Kennard Street, Maplewood, Minnesota, including any consequences thereof now existing or which may develop, whether or not such consequences are known or anticipated. Further, in consideration of the above payment the UNDERSIGNED ALSO EXPRESSLY DECLARES AND AGREES: (1) That all claims, past, present or future, are disputed and this full and final settlement shall not be treated as evidence of liability, nor as an admission of liability, nor as an admission of liability or responsibility at any time or in any manner whatsoever; (2) That this full and final release shall cover and include all and any future injuries, death and/or damages not now known to any of the parties hereto but which may later develop or be discovered, including the effects or consequences thereof and including the cause of action therefore; (3) That the Undersigned will indemnify and hold harmless the parties released by this agreement against loss, including counsel fees, from any and every claim or demand of every kind and character, including claims for contribution, which may be asserted by the Undersigned by reason of said occurrence, injuries and/or damages or the effects or consequences thereof; (4) It is further understood and agreed: That the parties released admit to no liability to the Undersigned nor to anyone whomsoever. This release shall bind the signers, their heirs, next of kin, executors, administrators, successors or assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the hand and seal of the Undersigned is set hereunto this day of , 2006. READ CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING Name Address STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF ) Name Address On this day of 2007, before me personally appeared. , to me personally known, and known to be the person individually or jointly described in and who executed the above instrument and who acknowledged to me the act of signing and sealing thereof. Notary Public MA P UBLIC WO DRIVEWAY SIDE * O. We, t( (Requesting Residing at: _ I R_) , j l6 m I) a ?�' j� In accordance with Maplewood Code of Ordinances Sec. 29 -119, seek permission from: Adjacent property owner: 141 -e _r 4/& /� 5 Residing at: / J Jv .tom /� G:{� (4; Legal owners of the following- described parcel: 5 ,5 G 4 C , F . J 14 �2 Property address: / S !fie , ' � t /l J) fi PIN LC Seek relief from the requirement to maintain a 5 -foot setback from the side lot property line for purposes of constructing a vehicular driveway or parking pad. We propose to add to or construct within —Q_._ feet of said lot line. We have discussed the issues of snow storage and removal, surface drainage runoff, and future driveway maintenance. It is understood that any construction of a permanent driveway in, on, or under the proposed area may be subject to conditions established by existing easement (if any) and said easement conditions or restrictions are acknowledged herein. The exact location of the common lot line and /or easement line (if any) is known and agreed upon by both consenting property owners. This instrument is no way cancels, alters, changes, or supersedes any city ordinance or state law that may affect this agreement. It is further agreed that the City of Maplewood be held harmless and exempt from any suit or legal action concerning or arising from this matter. We, the undersigned, do hereby I gi written permission for the above - requested relief. (Adjacent property owner[s]) (Address) (Telephone) (Date) Property address: ) eii rat oc'D 5f1 t PIN 0 September 11, 2006 Mr. R. Charles Ahl, PE Director of Public Works /City Engineer City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Ahl: E RE: Maplewood, Minnesota 1812/1816 South Kennard Street Retaining Wall and Drainage Evaluation SEH No. A- MAPLE0702.00 14.00 City Project No. 02 -10 We have completed the evaluation of the drainage and retaining wall between the properties located at 1812 and 1816 South Kennard Street. It is our conclusion that the grade of the driveway at 1812 South Kennard Street was modified resulting in the increase in water flowing into the basement at 1816 South Kennard Street. However, we do not believe that the change in the driveway grade and subsequent runoff led to the observed lean /tipping of the wood retaining wall between the two properties. The lean in the wall is the result of inadequate support or lack of tiebacks. We recommend remedial measures be taken to redirect the drainage down the driveway toward the street to alleviate the situation. Construct 80' of curb and gutter, Design D412 of Mn/DOT Standard Plate No. 7102I, along the north edge of the driveway at 1812 South Kennard Street. The cost for installation of the curb and gutter is estimated to be $3,600 to $5,000. The cost assumes significant labor and hand forming of the curb and gutter. Background Mr. Shursen has reported a significant increase in water flowing into his basement at 1816 South Kennard Street. The reported increase occurred after the driveway at 1812 South Kennard Street was reconstructed as part of the City Driveway Program in the Fall of 2004. Per a conversation with Mr. Shursen, he had recurring water problems in the southeast basement corner on the order of 5 to 6 gallons per rainfall event prior to reconstruction of the driveway. After reconstruction of the driveway he has had to pump out hundreds of gallons of water per rainfall event. Per our discussion with the City the driveway of 1812 South Kennard Street previously was graded to drain to the middle of the driveway with an inverted crown. After reconstruction, the driveway was sloped to drain toward the property boundary with 1816 South Kennard Street. The City has expressed concern that this has led to the increased flow of water into Mr. Shursen's basement and, potentially, the excessive outward lean of the wood retaining wall. The City provided SEH with base mapping and survey of the South Kennard Street' reconstruction. However, information was not available with respect to survey of the driveway in the area of concern prior to or after construction. Data Collection We performed a survey to supplement information provided to us by the City. This survey consisted of shooting elevations of the driveway edges, retaining walls and ground below the retaining walls. Location site features were determined by measuring distances from the existing homes and garage. The information obtained from this survey is presented on Exhibit 1. In addition, photographs were taken of the area. We have attached photographs showing the lean in the wall, slope of the driveway, and down spouts from 1816 South Kennard Street. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center DI St. Paul, MN 55 110-5196 SEH is an equal opportunity e.niployer I www.sehinc.com 1 651 .44(7.2000 1 800.325.2055 1 651.490.2150 fax Mr. R. Charles Ahl, PE September 11, 2006 Page 2 Evaluation Based upon our survey and discussions with Mr. Shursen and the City we believe the change in the slope of the driveway resulted in the increase in runoff toward Mr. Shursen's home and subsequently into his basement. The driveway currently slopes toward Mr. Shursen's home at a grade of 0.3% to 2.5 %. Additionally, the neighboring home has two downspouts that discharge onto the driveway, one of which directs flow directly onto the driveway. It is very probable that 300 to 400 gallons of water discharges onto the driveway toward Mr. Shursen's home in a 1 -inch rainfall event. There is very little impedance between the driveway and Mr. Shursen's home since there is coarse rock fill behind the wood retaining wall, which allows the water to drain quite rapidly. We completed an analysis of the wood retaining wall to determine if the excess water caused the noticeable outward lean. It is our opinion that the additional water did not cause the outward lean. Under normal loading conditions, soil or coarse filter aggregate only, an outward lean of approximately 2 to 4 inches would not be unusual. The analysis is based on the wall supported at 4 -foot intervals with 4x4 wood posts embedded 3.5 feet into the ground. The wall is approximately 3 to 3.3 feet high. Since a drain the and coarse filter aggregate were used behind the wall water pressure does not likely build up to a level that is detrimental. The wall is not expected to fail (completely tip over) unless an unusual loading condition occurs. This would be due to a surcharge load, such as a vehicle parked on the driveway, or excess water pressure due to a plugged drain tile or other circumstance. It should be noted that Mr. Shursen recently installed two additional drain file lines. One is located between his home and the wood retaining wall, approximately 6 inches below grade. The other drain file line is located behind wood retaining wall. There has been at least one rainfall event since this work was completed. Per a discussion with Mr. Shursen on August 23` this has significantly reduced the amount of water flowing into his basement. This was a very prudent approach to resolving the water problems, however, we still recommend that the drainage from the driveway be diverted with curb and gutter. This will restore the drainage conditions that existed prior to the driveway reconstruction. Conclusions At the request of the City of Maplewood we completed a review and evaluation of the drainage conditions and potential retaining wall issues between the properties at 1812 and 1816 South Kennard Street. We have determined that the modifications to the driveway at 1812 South Kennard Street led to the excess runoff toward 1816 South Kennard Street and subsequently increased water flow into the basement. The grade change and excess runoff; however, did not result in the outward lean of the wood retaining. The outward lean was the result of normal soil loads and inadequate supports or tiebacks. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. "�, /',� j r" Wayne S. Wambold, PE Senior Geotechnical Engineer wsw Attachments c: Steve Heth (SEH) Mark Lobermeier (SEH) s:\ko\tn\tnuple \070200 \4 -rprt \letter re[wt.doc MAPLEWOOD CITY SURVEY 3.2% 0 5 10 a 0 0 o, i 0 104 l A 0.6 GAR 0-1 .0 APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE J FILE NO. DRIVEWAY SLOPES PHONE: (651) 490 -2000 AMAPLE0702.00 EXHIBIT _ 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. 1812/1816 SO. KENNARD SEH ST. PAUL, MN 55110 DATE: NO.1 8/28/06 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 0.5% DOWN 0 SPOUTS 0.9% o _ LOWER WOOD RETAINING WALL x� 2.5% 1816 cp 1812 UPPER WOOD RETAINING WALL X 1.4% Lp I 0 0.9% c' DOWN o SPOUT � 1� 0.3 WOODEN FENCE � N 104 l A 0.6 GAR 0-1 .0 APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE J FILE NO. DRIVEWAY SLOPES PHONE: (651) 490 -2000 AMAPLE0702.00 EXHIBIT _ 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. 1812/1816 SO. KENNARD SEH ST. PAUL, MN 55110 DATE: NO.1 8/28/06 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA FA91:4 L I BYTAI W4 affl :49 TO: City Manager FROM: City Attorney and Finance Director RE: North St. Paul Electric Franchise Tax Ordinances Second Reading DATE: January 2, 2007 -a ffe iel-� It is proposed that the City Council approve the second reading of ordinances for the North St. Paul electric franchise tax. The ordinances have been amended from the first reading to reflect the language changes and rates approved in the St. Paul agreements. The City Council approved the first reading at the November 13, 2006 meeting without the rates. A change was made to the St. Paul ordinances relating to the purpose for the fee. This change was made to the North St. Paul ordinances and the rates were inserted. PAWORMAGWranchise fee nstp 2nd reading.doc AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO THE CITY OF NORTH SAINT PAUL, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN IN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, AN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND TRANSMISSION LINES, INCLUDING NECESSARY POLES, LINES, FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, FOR THE FURNISHING OF ELECTRIC ENERGY TO THE CITY, ITS INHABITANTS, AND OTHERS, AND TO USE THE PUBLIC WAYS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS OF THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Ordinance, the following capitalized terms listed in alphabetical order shall have the following meanings: City. The City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. City Utility System. Facilities used for providing non - energy related public utility service owned or operated by City or agency thereof, including sewer and water service, but excluding facilities for providing heating, lighting or other forms of energy. Commission. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, or any successor agency or agencies, including an agency of the federal government which preempts all or part of the authority to regulate electric retail rates now vested in the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. Company. The City of North Saint Paul, a Municipal Corporation, its successors and assigns. Electric Facilities. Electric transmission and distribution towers, poles, lines, guys, anchors, conduits, fixtures, and necessary appurtenances owned or operated by Company for the purpose of providing electric energy for public use. Notice. A written notice served by one party on the other party referencing one or more provisions of this Ordinance. Notice to Company shall be mailed to The City of North Saint Paul City Clerk, 2400 Margaret Street, North Saint Paul, MN 55109. Notice to the City shall be mailed to the City Clerk, City Hall, 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, MN 55109. Either party may change its respective address for the purpose of this Ordinance by written notice to the other party. Public Ground. Land owned by the City for park, open space or similar purpose, which is held for use in common by the public. Public Way. Any street, alley, walkway or other public right -of -way within the City. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF FRANCHISE 2.1 Grant of Franchise City hereby= b ants Company, for a period of 20 years from the date passed and approved by the City, the right to transmit and furnish electric energy for light, heat, power and other purposes for public and private use within and through the limits of the City as its boundaries now exist or as they may be extended in the future. For these purposes, Company may construct, operate, repair and maintain Electric Facilities in, on, over, under and across the Public Ways and Public Grounds of City, subject to the provisions of this Ordinance. Company may do all reasonable tivngs necessary or customary to accomplish these purposes, subject, however, to such reasonable regulations as may be imposed by the City pursuant to ordinance and to the further provisions of this franchise agreement. 2.2 Effective Date; Written Acceptance This franchise agreement shall be in force and effect from and after passage of this Ordinance, its acceptance by Company, and its publication as required by law. The City by Council resolution may revoke this franchise agreement if Company does not file a written acceptance with the City within 90 days after publication. 23 Service and Rates The service to be provided and the rates to be charged by Company for electric service in City are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. The area within the City in which Company may provide electric service is subject to the provisions of iVlinnesota Statutes, Section 2168.40. 2.4 Publication Expense The expense of publication of this Ordinance be paid by City and reimbursed to City by Company. 2.5 Dispute Resolution If either party asserts that the other party is in default in the performance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining party shall notify the other party of the default and the desired remedy. The notification shall be written. Representatives of the parties must promptly meet and attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved N -rithin 30 days of the written notice, the parties may jointly select a mediator to facilitate further discussion. The parties will equally share the fees and expenses of this mediator. If a mediator is not used or if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 30 days after first meeting with the selected mediator, either party may commence an action in District Court to interpret and enforce this franchise or for such other relief as may be permitted by law or equity for breach of contract, or either party may take any other action permitted by law. SECTION 3. LOCATION, OTHER REGULATIONS 3.1 Location of Facilities Electric Facilities shall be located, constructed and maintained so as not to interfere with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel along and over Public Ways and so as not to disrupt normal operation of any City Utility System previously installed therein. Electric Facilities shall be located on Public Grounds as determined by the City. Company's construction, reconstruction, operation, repair, maintenance and location of Electric Facilities shall be subject to permits if required by separate ordinance and to other reasonable regulations of the City to the extent not inconsistent with the terms of this franchise agreement. Company may abandon underground Electric Facilities in place, provided at the City's request, Company remove abandoned metal or 2 concrete encased conduit interfering with a City improvement project, but only to the extent such conduit is uncovered by excavation as part of the City improvement project. 3.2 Field Locations Company shall provide field locations for its underground Electric Facilities within City consistent with the requirements of itlinnesota Statutes, Chapter 216D. 33 Street Openings Company shall not open or disturb any Public '% or Public Ground for any purpose without first having obtained a permit from the City, if required by a separate ordinance, for which the City may impose a reasonable fee. Permit conditions imposed on Company shall not be more burdensome than those imposed on other utilities for similar facilities or work. Company may however, open and disturb any Public Way or Public Ground without permission from the City where an emergency exists requiring the immediate repair of Electric Facilities. In such event Company shall notify the City by telephone to the office desi by the City as soon as practicable. Not Later than the second working day thereafter, Company shall obtain any required permits and pay any required fees. 3.4 Restoration After undertaking any work requiring the opening of any Public '% or Public Ground, Company shall restore the same, including paring and its foundation, to as good a condition as formerly existed, and shall maintain any pared surface in good condition for two years thereafter. The work shall be completed as promptly as weather permits, and if Company shall not promptly perform and complete the work, remove all dirt, rubbish, equipment and material, and put the Public XX'av or Public Ground in the said condition, the City shall have, after demand to Company to cure and the passage of a reasonable period of time following the demand, but not to exceed fire days, the right to make the restoration at the expense of Company. Company shall pay to the City the cost of such work done for or performed by the City. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedy available to the City for noncompliance with this Section 3.4, but the City hereby waives any requirement for Company to post a construction performance bond, certificate of insurance, letter of credit or any other form of security or assurance that may be required, under a separate existing or future ordinance of the City, of a person or entity obtaining the City's permission to install, replace or maintain facilities in a Public Way 3.5 Avoid Damage to Electric Facilities Nothing in this Ordinance relieves any person from liability arising out of the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid damaging Electric Facilities while performing any actitiity. 3.6 Notice of Improvements The City must gi ve Company reasonable notice of plans for improvements to Public Ways or Public Ground where the City has reason to believe that Electric Facilities may affect or be affected by the improvement. The notice must contain: (i) the nature and character of the improvements, (ii) the Public Ways and Public Grounds upon which the improvements are to be made, (iii) the extent of the improvements, (iv) the time when the City will start the work, and (v) if more than one Public XX'ay or Public Ground is involved, the order in -,vllich the work is to proceed. The notice must be given to Company a sufficient length of time in advance of the actual commencement of the work to permit Company to make any necessary additions, alterations or repairs to its Electric Facilities. 3.? Shared Use of Poles Company shall make space available on its poles or towers for City fire, water utility, police or other City facilities whenever such use Nvill not interfere with the use of such poles or towers by Company, by another electric utility, by a telephone utility, or by any cable television 3 company or other form of communication company. In addition, the City shall pay for any added cost incurred by Company because of such use by City. SECTION 4. RELOCATIONS 4.1 Relocation of Electric Facilities in Public Ways If the City determines to vacate a Public XX'av for a City improvement project, or at City's cost to (Yr ade, regrade, or change the line of any Public XX'av or construct or reconstruct any City Utility System in any Public '% it may order Company to relocate its Electric Facilities located therein if relocation is reasonably necessary to accomplish the City's proposed public improvement. Except as provided in Section 4.3, Company shall relocate its Electric Facilities at its own expense. The City shall give Company reasonable notice of plans to vacate for a City improvement project, or to grade, regrade, or change the line of any Public Way or to construct or reconstruct any City Utility System. If a relocation is ordered within fire years of a prior relocation of the same Electric Facilities, which was made at Company expense, the City, shall reimburse Company for non - betterment costs on a time and material basis, provided that if a subsequent relocation is required because of the extension of a City Utility System to a previously unserved area, Company may be required to make the subsequent relocation at its expense. Nothing in this Ordinance requires Company to relocate, remove, replace or reconstruct at its own expense its Electric Facilities where such relocation, removal, replacement or reconstruction is solely for the convenience of the City and is not reasonably necessary for the construction or reconstruction of a Public 'Vay or City Utility System or other City improvement. 4.2 Relocation of Electric Facilities in Public Ground City, may require Company at Company's expense to relocate or remove its Electric Facilities from Public Ground upon a finding by City that the Electric Facilities have become or Nvill become a substantial impairment to the existing or proposed public use of the Public Ground. 43 Projects V-ith Federal Funding Relocation, removal, or rearrangement of any Company Electric Facilities made necessary because of the extension into or through City of a federally -aided highway project shall be governed by the provisions of Alinnesota Statutes, Section 161.46, as supplemented or amended. It is understood that the right herein granted to Company is a valuable right. City shall not order Company to remove or relocate its Electric Facilities when a Public Way is vacated, improved or realigned because of a renewal or a redevelopment plan which is financially subsidized in whole or in part by the Federal Government or any agency thereof, unless the reasonable non - betterment costs of such relocation and the loss and expense resulting therefrom are first paid to Company, but the City need not pay those portions of such for which reimbursement to it is not available. 4.4 No XX'aiver The provisions of this franchise apply only to facilities constructed in reliance on a franchise from the City and shall not be construed to waive or modify any rights obtained by Company for installations within a Company right -of -way acquired by easement or prescriptive right before the applicable Public '% or Public Ground was established, or Compan y 's rights under state or county permit. SECTION 5. TREE TRIMMING Company may trim all trees and shrubs in the Public Ways and Public Grounds of CMT to the extent Company finds necessary to avoid interference with the proper construction, operation, repair M and maintenance of anti Electric Facilities installed hereunder, provided that Company shall save the City harmless from any liability arising therefrom, and subject to permit or other reasonable regulation by the City =. SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION 6.1 Indemnity of City Company shall indemnify keep and hold the City free and harmless from any and all liability on account of injury to persons or damage to property occasioned by the construction, maintenance, repair, inspection, the issuance of permits, or the operation of the Electric Facilities located in the Public Ways and Public Grounds. The City shall not be indemnified for losses or claims occasioned through its own negligence except for losses or claims arising out of or alleging the City's negligence as to the issuance of permits for, or inspection of, Company's plans or work. The City shall not be indemnified if the injury or damage results from the performance in a proper manner of acts reasonably deemed hazardous by Company and such performance is nevertheless ordered or directed by City after notice of Company's determination. 62 Defense of Citv In the event a suit is brought against the City under circumstances where this agreement to indemnify applies, Company at its sole cost and expense shall defend the City in such suit if written notice thereof is promptly gig -en to Company within a period wherein Company is not prejudiced by lack of such notice. If Company is required to indemnify and defend, it -,�i11 thereafter have control of such litigation, but Company may not settle such litigation without the consent of the City, a =11ich consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section is not, as to d rd parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to the City, and Company, in defending any action on behalf of the City shall be entitled to assert in any action every defense or immunity that the City could assert in its own behalf. SECTION 7. VACATION OF PUBLIC WAYS The City shall give Company at least two weeks prior written notice of a proposed vacation of a Public Way. Except where required for a City project, the vacation of any Public Way after the installation of Electric Facilities, shall not operate to deprive Company of its rights to operate and maintain such Electric Facilities, until the reasonable cost of relocating the same and the loss and expense resulting from such relocation are first paid to Company. In no case, however, shall City be liable to Company for failure to specifically preserve a right -of -way under Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29. Any change in the form of government of the City shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance. Any governmental unit succeeding the City shall, -'- rithout the consent of Company succeed to all of the rights and obligations of the City provided in this Ordinance. 5 SECTION 9. FRANCHISE FEE 9.1 Fee Schedule Customer Class Fee Per Premise Per Month Residential customers $0.50 Small C &I — Non /Demand $1.00 Small C &I — Demand $6.00 Large Commercial & Industrial $45.00 9.2 Separate Ordinance The franchise fee shall be imposed by a separate ordinance duly adopted by the City Council, which ordinance shall not be adopted until after written notice enclosing such proposed ordinance has been served upon Company by certified mail. The fee shall not become effective until the beginning of a Company billing month after written notice enclosing such adopted ordinance has been served upon Company by certified mail. Section 2.5 shall constitute the sole remedy for solving disputes between Company and the City in regard to the interpretation of, or enforcement of, the separate ordinance. No action by the City to implement a separate ordinance will commence until this Ordinance is effective. A separate ordinance which imposes a lesser franchise fee on the residential class of customers than the maximum amount set forth in Section 9.1 above shall not be effective against Company unless the fee imposed on each other customer classification is reduced proportionately in the same or greater amount per class as the reduction represented by the lesser fee on the residential class. 9.3 Terms Defined For the purpose of this Section 9, the following definitions apply; 9.3.1 "Customer Class" shall refer to the classes listed on the Fee Schedule and as defined or determined in Company's electric tariffs on file with the Commission. 9.3.2 "Fee Schedule" refers to the schedule in Section 9.1 setting forth the various customer classes from which a franchise fee would be collected if a separate ordinance were implemented immediately after the effective date of this franchise agreement. The Fee Schedule in the separate ordinance may, include new Customer Class added by Company, to its electric tariffs after the effective date of this franchise agreement. 9.4 Collection of the Fee The franchise fee shall be payable quarterly and shall be based on the amount collected by Company, during complete billing months during the period for which payment is to be made by imposing a surcharge equal to the designated franchise fee for the applicable customer classification in all customer billings for electric service in each class. The payment shall be due the last business day, of the month following the period for which the payment is made. The franchise fee may be changed by ordinance from time to time; however, each change shall meet the same notice requirements and not occur more often than annually and no change shall require a collection from any customer for electric service in excess of the amounts specifically permitted by this Section 9. The time and manner of collecting the franchise fee is subject to the approval of the Commission. No franchise fee shall be payable by Company if Company is legally unable to first collect an amount equal to the franchise fee from its customers in each applicable class of customers by imposing a surcharge in Company's applicable rates for electric service. Company may pay the City the fee based upon the 6 surcharge billed subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectibles, refunds and correction of erroneous billings. Company agrees to make its records available for inspection by the City at reasonable times provided that the City and its designated representative agree in writing not to disclose anti information which would indicate the amount paid by any identifiable customer or customers or any other information regarding identified customers. In addition, the Company agrees to provide at the time of each payment a statement summarizing how the franchise fee payment was determined, including information showing any adjustments to the total surcharge billed in the period for which the payment is being made to account for any uncollectibles, refunds or error corrections. 9.5 Equivalent Fee Requirement. The separate ordinance imposing the fee shall not be effective against Company unless it lawfully imposes and the City monthly or more often collects a fee or tax of the same or greater equivalent amount on the receipts from sales of energy within the City by any other energy supplier, provided that, as to such a supplier, the City= has the authority to require a franchise fee or to impose a tax. The "same or greater equivalent amount" shall be measured, if practicable, by comparing amounts collected as a franchise fee from each similar customer, or by comparing, as to similar customers the percentage of the annual bill represented by the amount collected for franchise fee purposes. The franchise fee or tax shall be applicable to energy sales for any energy use related to heating, cooling or lighting, or to run machinery and appliances, but shall not apply to energy sales for the purpose of providing fuel for vehicles. If the Company specifically consents in writing to a franchise or separate ordinance collecting or failing to collect a fee from another energy supplier in contravention of this Section 9.5, the foregoing conditions be waived to the extent of such written consent. 10.1 Severability Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separate from every other section, provision, or part; and if any section, provision, or part shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other section, provision, or part. Where a provision of any other City ordinance conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance, the provisions of this Ordinance shall prevail. 10.2 Limitation on Applicability This Ordinance constitutes a franchise agreement between the City and Company as the only parties and no provision of this franchise shall in any way inure to the benefit of anti third person (including the public at large) so as to constitute any such person as a third party beneficiary of the agreement or of any one or more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action in any person not a party hereto. 7 SECTION 11. AMENDMENT PROCEDURE Either party to this franchise agreement may at any time propose that the agreement be amended to address a subject of concern and the other party Nvill consider whether it agrees that the amendment is mutually appropriate. If an amendment is agreed upon, this Ordinance may be amended at any time by the City passing a subsequent ordinance declaring the provisions of the amendment, which amendatory ordinance shall become effective upon the filing of Company's written consent thereto with the City Clerk xvithin 90 days after the date of final passage by the City_ of the amendatory ordinance. SECTION 12. PREVIOUS FRANCHISES SUPERSEDED This franchise supersedes any previous electric franchise granted to Company or its predecessor. Passed and approved: 1 2006. Diana Longrie, Mayor of City of Maplewood Attest: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk P: \WORD \AGN \electric francNscNSTPI.doc M ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRIC SERVICE FRANCHISE FEE ON THE CITY OF NORTH SAINT PAUL, A MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, FOR PROVIDING ELECTRIC SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES ORDAIN: AND THE FOLLOWING ADOPTED: SECTION 1. The City of Maplewood Municipal Code is hereby amended to include reference to the following Special Ordinance. Subdivision 1. Purpose. The Maplewood City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide electric services within the City of Maplewood. (a) Pursuant to City Ordinance a Franchise Agreement between the City of Maplewood and The City of North Saint Paul, a Minnesota corporation its successors and assigns, the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on The City of North Saint Paul, its successors and assigns, in an amount and fee design as set forth in Section 9 of the The City North Saint Paul Franchise and in the fee schedule attached hereto as Schedule A . Subdivision 2. Franchise Fee Statement A franchise fee is hereby imposed on The City of North Saint Paul, its successors and assigns, under its electric franchise in accordance with the schedule attached here to and made a part of this Ordinance, commencing with The City North Saint Paul, January 2007 billing month. This fee is an account -based fee on each premise and not a meter -based fee. In the event that an entity covered by this ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which xvill result in more than one franchise fee assessment for electric service to that premise. If the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entities covered by this ordinance have more than one premise, each premise (address) shall be subject to the appropriate fee. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company's manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the city will control. Subdivision 3. Payment The said franchise fee shall be payable to the City in accordance with the terms set forth in Section 9.4 of the Franchise. Subdivision 4. Surcharge The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission allows the utility company to add a surcharge to customer rates to reimburse such utility company for the cost of the fee and that The City of North Saint Paul will surcharge its customers in the City the amount of the fee. Subdivision 5. Record Support for Payment The City of North Saint Paul shall make each payment when due and, if required by the City, shall provide at the time of each payment a statement summarizing how the franchise fee payment was determined, including information showing any adjustments to the total surcharge billed in the period for which the payment is being made to account for any uncollectibles, refunds or error corrections. Subdivision 6. Enforcement Any dispute, including enforcement of a default regarding this ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. Subdivision 7. Effective Date of Franchise Fee The effective date of this Ordinance shall be after its publication and after the sending of written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to The City of North Saint Paul by certified mail. Collection of the fee shall commence as provided in Subdivision 2. Subdivision 8. Sunset Clause This ordinance shall automatically sunset on December 31, 2011, unless the City Council acts to renew or extend the fee at least six (6) months prior to the sunset date. The City Council may unilaterally renew or extend the fee on the same terms and conditions. V %ithout waiver of any rights under Minnesota law, the City Council shall seek agreement from Company if the City to change the fee rate or fee design. Passed and approved: .2006. Diana Longrie, l'layor ©f Ciy Qf llapleirood Attest: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk SEAL 2 SCHEDULE A Franchise Fee Rates: Electric Utility The franchise fee for the following purposes right -of -way maintenance, street lighting, burial of power lines, energy conservation, alternative energy sources and other city- ener2 - related expenses shall be in an amount determined by applying the following schedule per customer premise/per month based on metered service to customers within the City: Customer Class Fee Per Premise Per Month Residential customers $0.50 Small C &I — Nonf Demand $1.00 Small C &I — Demand $6.00 Large Commercial & Industrial $45.00 Franchise fees are to be collected by the Utility at the rate listed below, and submitted to the City on a quarterly basis as follows: January —March collections due by April 30. April —June collections due by July 31. July — September collections due by October 31. October — December collections due by January 31. P: \.WORD \.1G\ \electric franchise\STP2.d<>c 9 MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk ATTN: January 2, 2007 RE: Intoxicating Liquor License Application Introduction Agenda Item LI Kenneth Stidfole has completed an application for an intoxicating liquor license for a proposed off-sale liquor store at the Cub Foods Store located at 100 W. County Road B. Background The background check on Kenneth Stidfole for the purpose of holding an off-sale intoxicating liquor license in the City of Maplewood has been conducted and nothing was identified that would prohibit him from holding this license. Mr. Stidfole moved to the Fridley area when he was a young child. For the past nine years he has lived at his current home in the City of Centerville. Mr. Stidfole has been the store manager of the Cub Foods Store at 100 W. County Road B since August 2006. He has previous management experience at several other Cub Foods stores in the area including the Inver Grove Heights store. One of Mr. Stidfole's business references indicated that he has known him professionally for about three years and he is, "Very honest, conscientious, and reliable." Chief Thomalla has met with Mr. Stidfole to discuss measures to eliminate the sale of alcohol to underage persons, general security and retail crime issues, and the Maplewood Liquor Ordinances. During In the course of this investigation, state criminal history files were checked along with contacts and warrants in the cities of St. Paul, Maplewood, Blaine, and Fridley. Also checked were Ramsey, Hennepin, and Anoka counties. Consideration Approval of the intoxicating liquor license is requested. MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk ATTN: December 5, 2006 RE: Change of Manager Intoxicating Liquor License Intradiietion Agenda Item L2 Edward Bremer has completed an application for an intoxicating liquor license for Heritage Liquor (formerly Lor's Liquor Store) located at 1347 Frost Avenue. Backivound Mr. Bremer was raised in the Stillwater area and currently resides in St. Paul just south of the Gladstone neighborhood. After graduating from Stillwater High School, he attended St. Cloud State University where he obtained his bachelor's degree in Speech and Finance. After graduating from college Mr. Bremer managed Media Play stores in Maplewood, Coon Rapids, and St. Cloud. For the past four or five years he has been a partner in Envirotech North Central which is an oil and chemical absorbent company. At the end of October staff was informed by Blia Chong Lor, the former owner of Lor's Liquor Store, that he no longer had an interest in the liquor store and that Mr. Bremer had agreed in June of 2006 to purchase the business. We also obtained copies of a Cooler Purchase Agreement between Mr. Bremer and Mr. Lor dated June 9, 2006 and a Lease Agreement for the property located at 1347 Frost Avenue between Mr. Bremer and the owner dated August 1, 2006. Staff contacted Mr. Bremer and informed him that he was operating without a license. Chief Thomalla was also informed that Mr. Bremer had failed to obtain a license in a timely manner. On November 3 rd Chief Thomalla and Deputy Chief Banick met with Mr. Bremer at the 1347 Frost Avenue location and informed him that he must close the store until a liquor license was obtained. It should also be noted that on October 25, 2006, a liquor license application was received from Mr. Bremer and forwarded on to the Deputy Chief requesting a background check be conducted on Edward Bremer. Mr. Bremer has since been formally charged by the City Attorney's Office with a gross misdemeanor count for violation of liquor licensing requirements. Chief Thomalla and I met with Mr. Bremer, at his request, on November 6"' regarding details surrounding Heritage Liquor Store. During the conversation he stated numerous times that, "he should have applied for the license sooner, etc." When Mr. Bremer was interviewed by Deputy Chief Banick regarding his liquor license application he stated, "I took ownership the I" of June." Mr. Bremer said he purchased all the assets except the cooler and Lor's only stake in the business as of June was the cooler. According to Mr. Bremer, Mr. Lor came in once a week or every other week to check on the business. The police department has had two other contacts with Mr. Bremer. Mr. Bremer was the clerk who waited on an underage police decoy during an alcohol compliance check {10- 13-06) which he passed and he also reported a hit and run accident in the liquor store parking lot in early October. Mr. Bremer's personal and business references were quite complimentary. One stated, "Ed has been there six or seven months and has been easy to deal with." Another person stated, "Since Ed's taken over he's doing good business. He really improved the business. It was a dump until he took it over." Mr. Bremer's business partner stated that he has known Ed for fourteen years. He stated that Ed was a, "Trustworthy person, honest, with a good character." Chief Thomalla met with Mr. Bremer and his attorney to discuss measures to eliminate the sale of alcohol to underage persons, general security and retail crime issues, and the Maplewood Liquor Ordinances. In the course of this investigation, state criminal history files were checked along with contacts and warrants in the Cities of Maplewood, St. Paul, Coon Rapids, St. Cloud, Stillwater and Ramsey, Anoka, Steams, and Washington Counties. Consideration Staff is requesting consideration of the approval of the change of manager by Mr. Bremer. Agenda Item L3 19 1 a kyl IN 6 1 y.11 a I bill & TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfbile, City Clerk DATE: January 2, 2007 RE: Intoxicating Liquor License Annual Renewals — On-Sale, Off-Sale, Club and Wine RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that the following On-Sale, Off-Sale, Club and Wine Liquor Licenses, having been previously duly issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 2007, with approvals granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and health inspections: On-Sale Liquor Licenses Licensee Jill Skogheim Jose Valentin Leon Lynn Roth Dorothy Piotrowski Jacse Lee Nicholas Schwartz Carie Mike Judith A. Landreville Martin Mongoven Bret Shogren Paul Mateyka Raymond Emerfoll 5-8 Tavern & Grill Acapulco Mexican Restaurant AMF Maplewood Lanes Applebee's Neighborhood Grill Best Western Maplewood Inn Bleechers Bar and Grill Buffalo Wild Wings Grill Champps - Maplewood Chili's Grill & Bar #224 Chipotle Mexican Grill Dean's Garrity's Address 2289 Minnehaha Avenue 3069 White Bear Avenue 1955 English Street 3001 White Bear Ave., 1780 County Road D 2220 White Bear Avenue 3085 White Bear Avenue 1734 Adolphus Street 1800 Beam Avenue 2303 White Bear Avenue, 1986 Rice Street 1696 White Bear Avenue Michael Gengler Guldens Roadhouse 2999 North Highway 61 Cheryl Lynn Wolf Huey's Saloon 2425 Highway 61 Sherry Peak Jeffrey Kehr Matthew Hinrichs Gjon Prendi Stephen Parr Michael Pauly Amanda Kranz Philip Kenneth Poling Brian Meyer Matthew Kielas Brian Bauman Off-Sale Liquor Licenses Licensee Guneet Ameja Phillip Lu Arthur Stein Wendy Lauber Howard Remerowski Marvin Koppen Keller Golf Course Clubhouse 2166 Maplewood Drive Myth Nightclub Noodles & Company Olive Garden #1200 Outback Steakhouse Red Lobster #0283 Stargate Bar & Dance Club T.G.I. Friday's #0472 The Bird Nightclub The Chalet Lounge The Rock 3090 Southlawn Drive 2865 White Bear Avenue 1749 Beam Avenue 1770 Beam Avenue 2925 White Bear Avenue 1700 Rice Street, Suites J 3087 White Bear Avenue 3035 White Bear Avenue 1820 Rice Street 2029 Woodlynn Avenue Address A-I Liquor 19 Century Avenue North Big Discount Liquor 2515 White Bear Avenue Laber's Liquors 1700 D Rice Street Maplewood Wine Cellar 1281 Frost Avenue MGM Liquor Warehouse 2950 White Bear Avenue 1835 E. Larpenteur Avenue Party Time Liquor Blong Lee Princess Liquor'n Tobacco 2728 Stillwater Road Christopher Sarrack Sarrack's Int'l. Wine & Spirits 2305 Stillwater Road On-Sale Wine and Club Licensee Address B. Michael Diebel Goodrich Golf Course, Inc. 1820 North Van Dyke Robert Delmont Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc. 3095 White Bear Balbir Shoker Taste of India 1745 Cope Avenue Alan Hartman Maplewood Moose Lodge 1946 English Street MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: January 1, 2007 RE: 2007 City Council Appointments Introduction Item L4 At its first meeting of the year the Maplewood City Council officially makes the year's appointments to organizations of which the City is a member and to those who serve at the pleasure of the Council. The following appointment list is provided to the City Council for consideration at its January 8, 2007 regular council meeting. Appointment 2006 Appointment 2007 Appointment 800 MHz Liaison Acting Mayor* Kathleen Juenemann Will Rossbaeh (Alternate) Kathleen Juenemann *Rotation of acting mayors: 2005 Will Rossbach, 2006 Kathleen Juenemann Community Design Review Board Diana Longrie (2 ° & 4` b Tuesday 7:00 p.m.) Shann Finwall (Staff Liaison) Data Compliance Officers: Responsible Authority City Personnel Officer City Law Enforcement Officer Environment & Natural Resources Commission (i" Wednesday of the Month) Karen Guilfoile Karen Guilfoile Sherrie Le Terrie Rameaux David Thomalla David Thomalla Kathleen Juenemann DuWayne Konewko (Staff Liaison) DuWayne Konewko Fire Relief Association Diana Longrie Relief By -Laws require Mayor to be member of the Board Historical Preservation Diana Longrie Commission (3` Thursday at 7:00 p.m.) Gayle Bauman (Staff Liaison) Pauline Staples (Staff Liaison) Housing & Redevelopment Rebecca Cave Authority Melinda Coleman (Staff Liaison) Tom Ekstrand (Staff Liaison) (2nd Wednesday at 7:00 p.m.) Joint Ice Arena Board Erik Hjelle Rebecca Cave Bruce Anderson (Staff Liaison) Doug Taubman (Staff Liaison) Maplewood Community Outreach Committee Discussion Municipal Legislative Commission Kathleen Juenemann (Monthly, Wed. 11:30 a.m. -1:00 p.m.) Diana Longrie (Alternate) N.E.S.T (First Tuesday 7:30 p.m.) Will Rossbach Diana Longrie Official Newspaper Parks & Recreation Commission (3r Wednesday at 7:00 p.m.) The Partnership Planning Commission (1 & 3� Tuesdays at 7:00 p.m.) Maplewood Review Pioneer Press (Alternate) Rebecca Cave Bruce Anderson (Staff Liaison) No Council Liaison David Kvam (Staff Liaison) John Banick (Staff Liaison) Will Rossbach Ken Roberts (Staff Liaison) Police Civil Service Commission Erik Hjelle (Meets as Needed) Sherrie Le (Staff Liaison) Ramsey County League of Local Governments Kathleen Juenemann Will Rossbach (Alternate) RamseylWashington Suburban Cable Commission Rush Line Corridor Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce Kim Facile Erik Hjelle (Alternate) Robert Cardinal (Alternate) Will Rossbach Chuck Ahl (Staff Liaison) Diana Longrie Heidi Carey (Staff Liaison) Karen Guilfoile (Staff Liaison) Need 2007 Council Appointment Mike Shortreed Ken Roberts (Staff Liaison) Terrie Rameaux (Staff Liaison) Chuck Ahl (Staff Liaison) Suburban Rate Authority Diana Longrie (First month of quarter) St. Paul Water Utility Will Rossbach Board of Commissioners Agenda Item L5 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: January 1, 2007 RE: Rules of Procedures for Public Hearings Attached are the current Rules oj'Proceduresfor Public Hearings. Staff is requesting council consider and recommend any changes as a normal part of annual business. R a U i-r U sa " O 4� 4-4 O U U N �1 U U U m (n U^QQ cl Cj 7� H a 0 0 ti .4 U u V aj U U 1 V c� cz �+ N •C11 U cz Z O ct C � O �. H �o W L � • �� ;-4 ti rH flu{ O U * tr, � C U 'U— a nn O a.., 4 ct U ' 7 u o ct 4-4 t ;-4 o o u O u o V) a � O o O s U s' U y "O + U � "C O U O ct C/� R+ C ;-4 G -& O U �--+ . �-+ m Uri r r 3-I c o ct v ." � V bJJ � • �� • fib � O ff'+ � •v � O �4.4 00 U �= a N P 0 4- "� cis O 54 cn O cn O 'C 4.4 ct v V C O U U U w 4. UD O O u� a� O 4 . O S.4 N 5 c N 4 4-� ;-4 a C) C� p ;-4 v ,� O � b a O b u O O C) U G) O 'v � V; u to o m � c '� � � n 7;4 C) fn a- ct x Q 4� UD cn tn U ct3 T, C T O m cn d' 7 ti U V. cu Im cz Z O ct O �. H �o L � , ti ; ti 4 4-� ;-4 a C) C� p ;-4 v ,� O � b a O b u O O C) U G) O 'v � V; u to o m � c '� � � n 7;4 C) fn a- ct x Q 4� UD cn tn U ct3 T, C T O m cn d' 7 ti U V. cu Im Agenda Item L-6 TO: City Council From: Greg Copeland, City Manager Date: January 2, 2007 Re: Discontinuation of Pre-Agenda Meetings in 2007 Given the cancellation of the two December Pre-Agenda Meetings and the limited attendance at pre-agenda meetings over the last six months of 2006, the City Council should give consideration to not holding Pre-Agenda meetings in 2007. The staff are available to answer individual City Council members questions on any agenda reports or other matters before scheduled workshops or City Council Meetings either by email or telephone. I believe directing specific questions to staff regarding their reports prior to meetings would be a more efficient than continuing to hold Pre-Agenda Meetings. Recommendation: City Council adopt a motion to discontinue Pre-Agenda Meetings in 2007 and amend the Rules of Procedure for City Council and Council Meetings to strike language in Section 1 meetings, A. Regular. (See attached) .To9zffw& We can Section I MEETINGS A. Regular The City Council shall hold regular meetings on the second and fourth Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m., provided that when the day fixed for any regular meeting falls on a day designated by law as a legal holiday, such meeting shall be held at the same hour on the next succeeding Tuesday, not a holiday, unless authorized by the City Council. in additio t he Council shall meet at 4:45 p.m. on the ThuFsday pr-eeodin the second and fouFth Mendays. Those- g may be eane@!@(4 by 4w City Ga+moil of i�wai+anted. N Agenda Item L7 AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: January 2, 2007 RE: ATM Machine Purchase Intradiietion On a daily basis at city hall, customers can be heard asking, "Do you have a cash machine?" When we send them to another location to obtain cash so that they can do business with us — in some cases we have no guarantee that they will come back or go to another location to conduct their business. The city takes pride in providing courteous and service-oriented opportunities to the large number of citizens that come to us for various needs. To further our goal of excellence in customer service, I am proposing installation of ATM machines for city hall and the community center. Backivound There are three options available to us in this venture: Option 1: Purchase the ATM machines (negotiated at cost) and receive 100% of surcharges generated. Surcharge is the fee collected for each transaction. The negotiated cost of the machines is guaranteed the lowest in the nation with a 90 day "best price" guarantee. And we will be checking! Option 2: Lease the ATM's and receive 100% of the surcharges generated. Option 3: Participate in a free 90 day trial. The ATM machines will be placed in our locations with no cost or obligation to us for a 90 day test trial. The city would receive .25 per transaction during this period. ATM machines accept most major ATM debit or credit cards. The majority of the processors for these cards is either VISA or MasterCard that assume any related fees that are charged for transactions. The actual transaction fee for receiving cash is generally set at $1.50 to $2.00 per transaction and over 75% of the user's of ATM machines withdraw $40.00 during each transaction. Staff has negotiated a "below market value" price of $3,100 each for the purchase of two machines. It is believed that profits from the machines will pay for themselves within a six month period of time if the cost is set at $2.00 per transaction. In addition to the purchase price of the machines, it is estimated by IT Director FowIds that it will cost approximately $1,000 to install phone lines needed for networking purposes. Included in the 2006 budget was a $16,000 allocation for election equipment in the event that there were not enough grant funds available to bring the city into compliance with the Federal Help America Vote Act. Using these funds was not necessary as Federal funds were available to purchase our new handicapped accessible equipment. Consideration Staff is requesting that council approve the purchase of ATM machines from Ultimate ATM Service for $3,100 each (excluding tax) and for the installation of the necessary phone lines. Funds from the 2006 Election budget will be used to pay for the purchase and installation. Agenda Item L8 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Planner SUBJECT: Moratorium Variance and Rezoning PROJECT: Saint Clair Hills LC}C/\T|C]N: Carver Avenue, east of Sterling Street DATE: December 21.2000 Mr. Jamie Jensen, representing Tyrus Land Company, is requesting city approval of a variance to 8 nnnn8k}hUnn and 8 zoning nn8p change. He is asking the city for these 8ppn]v8kS for the undeveloped property nn the south side Of Carver Avenue east Cf Sterling Street. Please see his statement 0D pages 12-14 and the maps OO pages 15 through 2O. Requests The applicant is requesting that the city approve: 1. A variance from @ development moratorium ordinance. Refer tO the statement starting 0Dpage 12. 2. A zoning map change for the project site. This change would b8 from R-1(R) (rural residential) to R-1 (single dwellings). (Please see the property line/zoning map on page 16.) On November 13, 2006, the city council gave second reading to a moratorium ordinance for many nf the properties south Cf Carver Avenue. The adoption 0f this ordinance bv the city council prohibits any development or subdivision of any property south of Carver Avenue that the city has zoned F /t8[Ol residence) and R-1(R) (rural residential). This Dl0r8t0[iuDl includes the properties in this request. (See the adopted moratorium 0D pages nine -8|RvSn.) DISCUSSION Development Moratorium Variance As noted above, the council recently adopted 8 moratorium ondevelopment for many of the properties south [f Carver Avenue. The moratorium will end in November 2007nr after the city approves changes hJ the comprehensive plan, h] the zoning ordinance 0[t0 the zoning maps for the area. The council enacted this moratorium, 8S outlined iO Section 1.02[f the moratorium, "to review existing and planned land uses and zoning designations and the existing natural and constructed features in the south Maplewood study area, including @ review Dfthe diversity of housing options within Maplewood because 0fzmOing." Mr. Jensen is requesting a variance to the moratorium so the city may consider a zoning map change for the property. The city cannot consider the zoning map change for the property with the [n0rGLOhUD1 that is now iO p|@C8 unless the city Gpp[0v8S 8 variance to the [n0[8b3[iUDl. | diSCU3S the proposed zoning map change below. Section 4Of the moratorium ordinance outlines the criteria and procedure the city i3b3 follow for considering 8 variance to the 0rdiD@OQ8. Section 4.01 S@y3 "The city council, 81 their discretion, may grant variances from this ordinance based upon a determination that a proposed subdivision or development would be compatible with proposed land use and zoning, and that such proposals would keep with the spirit and intent of this ordinance. The procedures t0be followed iOapplying for a variance from this ordinance shall be in accordance with state law on findings for variances and shall include the following: 8. The applicant shall file 8 &DDlp|et8d application form, together with [8qUi[Bd exhibits, b3the Community Development Department. b. The application for 8variance shall set forth special circumstances or conditions that the applicant alleges to exist and shall demonstrate that the proposed subdivision or development is compatible with existing or proposed land use and zoning. C. The city will submit the application to the planning commission for their review and recommendation bJ the city council. d. The city council may set, 8t its discretion, 8 public hearing before making 8final determination on the requested variance. 8. The city council may impose such restrictions upon the proposed subdivision 0r development aS may b8 necessary tV meet the purpose and intent 0fthis ordinance. The issue for the city b3 consider with this variance iSbJdetermine if the request has special circumstances or conditions that merit approval and if the proposed rezoning (and then the proposed subdivision) would be compatible with existing or proposed land use and zoning. Zoning Map Change Mr. Jensen iS asking the city b3 change the zoning 0f the property from R-1/R\ (rural residential) bJ R-1 (single dwellings). The city changed the zoning this site toR-1(R) in3O03 after the city completed 8 study [U south Maplewood and created the R-1(R) zoning district. (See the August 25. 20O3 city council minutes with the adopted fl-1 (R) zoning ordinance starting On page 45.)As| noted above, the city may not consider this zoning map change until the moratorium and study are complete or if the city approves 8 variance to the nnon8tnriUnn. Section 44-1105Of the zoning code requires that the city council make several findings b3 rezone 8 property. They include: 1 . The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code; 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure Ordetr8otfnmnitheua8OfOeighbOrng property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded; 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences Of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare; ill 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension Of public services and facilities, such 83 public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. |n this case, staff cannot determine J the proposed zoning map change would meet any or all of the required criteria. These are all elements and criteria that the city should be considering and reviewing as part of the study of the area that staff will be doing during the development moratorium. It also k5 important to note that public utilities are near, but not next to, the property in question. They are now located t0 the west [fthe site near the intersection [f Carver Avenue and Sterling Street. The city or the developer would need to extend the sanitary 88vver and water to the east to serve this site t0 allow the developer to CDnGirU[t the proposed subdivision. Before the City vv0U|d 8||ovv such Uh|ib/ extensions to oCCUr however, the city would require the oOnnp|8[i0n 0f8 feasibility study for the public improvements. Such a study would help the city determine the size and location of the new utilities and would ensure that such improvements would be done in a logical, efficient, and economical manner. The feasibility study also would include a financing plan for covering the costs of the improvements (including the preliminary assessments for each affected property). Since there are not utilities immediately available to the site, and since the city has not done a feasibility study for the extension of public utilities in this area, staff cannot determine if the proposed zoning change would have any negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities. As such, and since staff i8 recommending that the city not grant the variance to the moratorium, the city should not approve the rezoning request from R- 1 /R\ t0 R-1 for the Saint Clair Hills development. Conclusion The proposed moratorium variance request and the rezoning do not meet the findings for approval. As such, the city should proceed with the study for the moratorium area as directed by the city council and deny the applicant's requests. OD December 10,206 the planning commission, 0DG5-0 vote, recommended that the city council deny the moratorium variance request and the proposed rezoning. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Deny the request of Jamie Jensen for @variance from the development moratorium for the property south 0f Carver Avenue and east Of Sterling Street. This variance would allow the city to consider 8 rezoning request for the properties inquestion. City staff is recommending this denial because: 1. Strict enforcement 0f the moratorium ordinance would not cause @O undue hardship b}the property or to the property owner. 2. There are no special dncUrnsL8nCe or conditions in this case that warrant the rUv approving a variance to the moratorium 3. The proposed rezoning (and then the proposed subdivision) would b8 premature and would not be compatible with the land use and zoning designations. 4. The proposed rezoning and subdivision would not meet the spirit and intent ofthe moratorium ordinance. B. Deny the proposed zoning map change (from R-1/RUt0R-1) for the proposed Saint Clair Hills development on Carver Avenue. City staff is recommending denial because: 1. The request does not meet all the criteria required by the city for G zoning map change. This is because the city cannot determine if the proposed zoning change would have any negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and 2. Staff is recommending that the city not grant the variance to the moratorium. The moratorium prohibits the city from considering rezoning or development requests, unless the city approves a variance to the moratorium. CITIZEN COMMENTS City staff surveyed the owners of the 1Oproperties within 5UOfeet of this site and all those that own property on Carver Avenue between |-4S4 and Century Avenue. The following are the comments the city received: FOR: Rezoning the two pieces iSthe right dhingtodo.VVeneedtopWShfnrfUUd8ve|Opn18ntinthiS part of Maplewood. K8y property taxes for 2UO7 are going Up28% this On top [f81O0% increase over 2005 and 2000. How can |.0r anyone else, live under these conditions? The only way our pF0pShv is worth what the DOUDh/ is saying is t0 have it fully developed. It i3 great for the neighbors to have rural atmosphere, but on whose nickel, or$7.30Uin this case? |Lis time for 8 reality check down here by all neighbors. Thanks. (Jay Libby —25S1 Carver Avenue) AGAINST: 1. VV8 are opposed b3 the rezoning because vve think b should remain rural. The taxes are SOhigh now that we could not afford city sewer and water assessment costs on top of that. They should only be 8Uovv8d to put two houses on that |[t as it is currently. It is unfair to include the Ledo property in the development when no deal has been made with the Ledos!! /8ch|Onnko- 2511 Carver Avenue) ffl 2. | @Dl for the [n0[GLOhUDl as is! | @Dl also opposed to the [8z0DiDg at any time. | DlOvSd b3 this neighborhood because of the D8LU[8, the wild deer that you are killing off every fall. Now we have wild turkey and other habitat in the area. With new homes and new residents, you will have to destroy them too! Also is Fish Creek going to handle the run off, not only us up on the hill, but also on the down side. We have a very unique part of Maplewood and it would be much better tO keep 8Sis. Land developers are 8 dime 8 dozen and destroy much of our natural beauty - and they say the housing market iSdown! (VVong-2595 Carver Avenue) 3. Please see the e-mail message from Patty Geahn0npage 21. 4. Please see the letter from Jim Kerrigan onp@ges22@nd23. 5. Please see the e-mail message from Tom H0nwothon page 24. 8. Please see the e-mail message from Douglas Coombs on page 25. 7. Please see the e-mail message from Connie and Mark VVieg8|0D page 20. 8. Please see the e-mail message from Amy Kaiser on page 27. 9. Please see the e-mail message from Chris and Jane Jenkins on page 28. 10. Please seethe e-mail message from the Baileys on page 29. 11. Please see the e-mail message from Sue Bonibc0n page 30. 13. Please see the e-mail message from Mark Bonitzon pages 31 -33. 13. Please see the e-mail message from Ted Cyctaron page 34. 14. Please see the e-mail message from Patrick Bailey nn page 35. 15. Please see the e-mail message from Nona Johnson 0n page 38. 18. Please see the e-mail message from Claire Jensen on page 37. 17. Please see the e-mail message from Jeff Jensen on page 38. 18. Please see the e-mail message from the [|a|houn8on page 38. 19. Please see the e-mail message from Uyen Campbell On page 40. 20. Please see the e-mail message from Dick SLahrnn page 41. 21. Please see the e-mail message from Greg and Carol Thompson on page 42. 22. Please see the e-mail message from Carl Erb on page 43. 23. Please see the e-mail message from Carolyn Peterson 0n page 44. 9 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION ShBsiz8: 5.22 acres (east parcel) and 3.38acres (251O Carver Avenue) Existing land use: Undeveloped North: Single dwellings across Carver Avenue South and East: Ramsey County Open Space and Fish Creek VV88i: Single dwelling @L251O Carver Avenue and Sterling Street PLANNING Land Use Fq@n designation: R-1 (single dwellings) Existing Zoning: R-1(R) (rural residential) Proposed Zoning: R-1 (single dwellings) Findings for Moratorium—Variance Approval Variances from this ordinance may b8granted by the city council based upon @ determination that a proposed subdivision or development would be compatible with existing or proposed land use and zoning and that such proposals would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this ordinance. The pn]C8dVre8 to be followed in applying fora variance from this ordinance shall be in accordance with state law on findings for variances and shall include the following: 1. The applicant shall file 8 c0nDp|8LRd application h3[Dl together with required exhibits to the Community Development Department. 2. The application for a variance shall set forth special circumstances or conditions which the applicant alleges to exist, and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is compatible with existing Or proposed land use and zoning. 3. The application shall be submitted to the planning commission for their review and comment. 4. The city council may in its discretion set a public hearing prior to making a final determination on the requested variance. 5. The city council may impose such restrictions upon the proposed development orsubdivision as may be necessary to comply with the purpose and intent of this ordinance. SECTION 4- VARIANCES 4.01 The city council, at their discretion, may grant variances from this ordinance based upon a determination that a proposed subdivision or development would be compatible with proposed land use and zoning, and that such proposals would keep with the spirit and intent N of this ordinance. The procedures to be followed in applying for a variance from this ordinance shall bSiD accordance with state law 0O findings for variances and shall include the hJ|k3vvDg: 8. The @oo|iC@nt shall file 8 completed application form, together vvdh required exhibits, t0 the Community Development Department. b. The application for 8variance shall set forth special circumstances or conditions that the applicant alleges tn exist and shall demonstrate that the proposed subdivision or development is compatible with existing or proposed land use and zoning. C. The city will submit the application to the planning commission for their review and recommendation Lo the city council. d. The city council may set, at its discretion, a public hearing before making a final determination On the requested variance. 8. The city council may impose such restrictions upon the proposed subdivision or development 8S may be necessary t0 meet the purpose and intent 0f this ordinance. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Variances State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve G variance from the zoning code: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 2. The variance would bein keeping with the spirit and intent Ofthe ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be put b38 reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight 0fthe landowner i8 due Lo circumstances unique Lo his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute 8D undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Rezoning Section 44-1165of the zoning code requires that the city council make the following findings to rezone property: 1 . The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code; 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure ordetr8(tfnomUleUseOfn8ighborng property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent hD the area included in the proposed change or plan ia adequately safeguarded; N 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, vvh8r8 8pp|iCGb|S. and the public welfare; 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such GG public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Application Date The city received this application on November 27, 2006. State law requires that the city council take action ml this request within 80 days Of receiving the request. /\S such, the city council should act on these requests and notify the applicant in writing of the city's action by January 23, 2007. p:sao24-28\o dair hill -mocVar and rezone -2UO8 Attachments: 1. Moratorium Ordinance 2. Applicant's Statement dated 11-14-08 3. Location Map 4. Property Line/Zoning Map 5. Address Map 0. Existing Conditions Map 7. Preliminary Plat H. Site Plan 9. e-mail message from Patty Geahn 10. Letter from Jim Kerrigan 11. e-mail message from Tom Horvath 12. e-mail message from Douglas Coombs 13. e-mail message from Connie VViege| 14. e-mail message from Amy Kaiser 15. e-mail message from Chris Jenkins 1S. e-mail message from the Baileys 17. e-mail message from Sue Bonitz 18. e-mail message from Mark Bonitz 19. e-mail message from Ted Cyptar 20. e-mail message from Patrick Bailey 21. e-mail message from Nona Johnson 22. e-mail message from Claire Jensen 23. e-mail message from Jeff Jensen 24. e-mail message from the Ca|houna 25. e-mail message from UyenCampbell 2G. e-mail message from Dick @tehr 27. e-mail message from Greg Thompson 28. e-mail message from Carl Erb 28. e-mail message from Carolyn Peterson 3U. August 25.2O03 city council minutes (R-1(R) zoning code) N . MINUTES Attachment 1 MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7: 03 P.M. Monday, November 13, 2006 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 06 -28 A. CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, and was called to order at 7:03 P.M. by Mayor Longrie. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL Diana Longrie, Mayor Present Rebecca Cave Councilmember Present Erik Hjelle, Councilmember Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Will Rossbach, Councilmember Absent H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8:17 p.m. South Maplewood Development Moratorium Ordinance (Second Reading) a. Planner Roberts presented the report. b. Mayor Longrie opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: AN ORDINANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROTECTING THE PLANNING PROCESS, FOR PROTECTING THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF MAPLEWOOD AND FOR DEVELOPING LAND USE AND ZONING STANDARDS AND LAND USE PLANNING FOR THE AREA SOUTH OF CARVER AVENUE IN MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA The area under consideration in this ordinance (hereinafter referred to as the "South Maplewood Study Area ") includes all the land south of Carver Avenue in Maplewood (refer to the South Maplewood Study Area map for the location) that the city has zoned F (farm residence) and R-1 (R) (rural residential). The Maplewood City Council ordains: SECTION 1. PURPOSE 1.01 The City of Maplewood is currently conducting a study that includes land use, zoning and planning components for the area south of Carver Avenue. 1.02 The objective of the study is to review existing and planned land uses and zoning designations and the existing natural and constructed features in the south Maplewood study area, including a review of the diversity of housing options within Maplewood because of the zoning. From this 9 City Council Meeting November 13, 2006 information, the city may make changes tothe comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance or the land use plan in the area to create better-planned and constructed developments and neighborhoods. 1.03 |n addition k} the study, the city may need k} revise the city's zoning ordinance, zoning map, land use map and comprehensive plan because of the following issues: - Land use - K8iOirnunl lot sizes Public utility availability (including sewer and water and the CnStS and impact on the 8pe8\ - Building setbacks - Open space connectivity - Existing city and county public land uses ' Parks and trails connections - Mississippi River Critical Area considerations - Mississippi National River and Recreational Area (MNRRA) considerations, including those Of neighboring communities - Metropolitan Council Requirements and Land Planning Guide Book (including, but not |inniL8d Lo, the strategies for protecting special resources including solar access, wind energy access, the urban service area and historic pre8erv8Uon). ' Pedestrian flow and safety Parking - Historical features and the objectives listed in the M8p|evv00d C0Dlp[8h8DSivB P|8D - Topography - Wetlands, ponding8nd other water features - Storm-water systems and management requirements Housing density - The percentage nfR-1(R) acreage tn other land use acreage for residential purposes in K88p|Svv0Od. - The percentage of R-1 (R) housing potential in relation to other designations for housing opportunities in Maplewood, i.e. single dwelling, 4O.00O square foot lots versus 10,O00 square foot lots, R-1, R-1/S\, mid-density, high density to provide comprehensive list of the housing options inMaplewood. The financial impacts of development nn the city - Street p8tt8[DS and traffic flows - R8n0G8V/VV8Shingt0O Metro Watershed District considerations and rRqUir8DlSOL3 - K8n[)OT Highway and Traffic Plans for the area, including traffic and public safety ' Preservation of housing and life-style options 1.04 There is8need for the city to do these studies so that the city staff and the city council will have current and relevant information before considering Vr making any changes to the city's comprehensive plan and to the city's zoning ordinance, zoning map and land use map for the area south of Carver Avenue. 2.01 The city COUD[j| authorizes the ohv staff to do this study. City staff shall coordinate this Study with the p|8ODiDg c0[DD1iSSi0l. the environmental and D3tuc8| resources commission, the historical preservation 0onnnni8Sion, other government agencies, property owners, interested citizens, the city council and any other entities that may provide input 1othe study. 2.02 Upon completion 0fthe study, city staff will present the study and its results to the planning commission for their review and recommendation to the city council. 10 City Council Meeting November 13'2O0S 2.03 A moratorium on development in the south Maplewood Study Area is adopted pending completion of the study and/or the adoption of any amendments to the city's zoning ordinance, zoning map, land use map Vr comprehensive plan 88the city deems necessary because of the study. The city will not approve any new development, subdivision or building permit for a new bui|ding, during the nlO[8b3[iUn0 period. M8p|8vv0Od may iSSU8 building permits for the Rxp8DSiOD or FSD10d8|iOg of existing structures, for accessory structures or for one new principal structure On an existing lot of record where the owner does not subdivide the property. SECTION 3. TERM 3.01 The term of ordinance shall be for one year or until the city council adopts amendments tDthe city's zoning ordinance, zoning map, land use map or comprehensive plan as the city deems necessary because of the study or the city council takes any action that directly affects the study or the ordinance. SECTION 4. VARIANCES 4.01 The city council, at their discretion, may grant variances from this ordinance based upon determination that a proposed subdivision or development would be compatible with proposed land use and zoning, and that such proposals would keep with the spirit and intent of this ordinance. The procedures to be followed in applying for a variance from this ordinance shall be in accordance with state law on findings for variances and shall include the following: 8. The applicant shall file a completed application form, together with required exhibits, to the Community Development Department. b. The application for 8 variance shall set forth special cirouD\8t8noesO[CoOdhbOnath8t the applicant alleges 0n exist and shall demonstrate that the proposed subdivision or development i8 compatible with existing or proposed land use and zoning. The city will submit the application to the planning commission for their review and recommendation to the city council. d. The city council may set, at its discretion, a public hearing before making a final determination oO the requested variance. 8. The city council may impose such restrictions upon the proposed subdivision or development as may be necessary to meet the purpose and intent of this ordinance. Seconded by Mayor LODgri8 Ayes-All 9:19 p.m. ,4 five minute break was taken. 11 City Council Meeting November 13'2O0S Attachment 2 1 M 8 3 1 5" Street NW suftv C New Brighton, Minns to 5. 1 1 1 1 651 633-5010 651 633-1404 (fax) /7 I.Application for Zoning Change 12 12 Existine Zoning MENEMM We are aware of the Copar development, We ask for none of the allowances they require. We will be offering single-family residential 10,000 square-foot lots, very low density, a reasonable and allowable cul de sac, and sianificant efforts with regard to Fish Creek. Area Desire for Development: 13 13 The City also anticipates the development of this area. The area is located in Sanitary Sewer District 70. The "200' ) South Maplewood Sewer Study" adopted by the City Council states that : 7, A gravity sanitary sewer can serve District 70 and the sanitary sewer flows from the 240- acre Bailey's Nursery parcel in Woodbury and Newport, When the city or a developer extends municipal sanitary sewer to serve District 70, the new pipe must be sized large enough to serve the 240-acre Bailey Nursery parcel. (Italics added) Jamie Jensen President, Torus Land Company 14 4 N SITE Attachment 3 t. c f f Location Map St Clfdr Nils Carver Avenue N Attachment 4 Zoning Map St Clfdr Nils Carver Avenue D I 1 435 144 t. if M1440 4475 Attachment 5 Address Map St Clair Hills Carver Avenue SITE Atta ent m I 2595 2575 r. 2511 - -- -- ---- - --- — — — — - — — — — — — --- — — -- — — -. 1 4 , . ---------------------- ­ — ZARVER' - — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- X- ----------- --- ---------------- av S-40cr 2610 SITE A OPEN SPACE Vs." ip j $ 5y —V� m I 1:11ti m I 2575 2595 2 z 4: C 1 7 CARVER AVE iC.S.A,H NO. 40 . .. . ........ 1 WFER AVE, 1:11ti m I Attachment 8 Sq Fl OPEN SPACE 15, sq F1 2 H I C - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- _-- - - - - - ff - --------- v zC ----------------------- L CARYU -AYA, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sq Fl 15, sq F1 2 4 i M I Ken Roberts From: wipersplusp_ coo east. net Sent: Fri-day, December 08, 2006 9 AM To: Ken Roberts Cc: hrcbailey@romcasL net Subject: A against a development Carver area 2575 carver ave Patzy G - earin is for the moratorium and opposed to the re zoning of land at any time. Needed nature wild life in this area. This would kill off and destroy all the wild life. Fish Creek needs repair as is has been damaged and can not handle any more run off. Not only us but on the hill and the other side. Keep as is and land developers out as they are a dime a dozen. So make this clear I am against TYrus Land Co. and any developments any where in south Maplewood area. P.S. This is in reference to reply needed for the city council of Maplewood 21 21 A tt ac h ment �- I Attacnment 10 Jim Kerrigan St. Paul, MN 55119 Ken Roberts City of Maplewood � " 1 1 ■ M I. jjj III F; 1?1 M"k « # #k. III I k IMPOI = OEM INIVIN!" I I I I 1 11 », �I jjjj I III III 10-re ski reT =11-F1 k Variance to the south Carver Avenue development moratorium Rezoning from R1 (R) to Ri At this time I do not support approval of either of these two requests by Tyrus, In a letter I previously provided to <,»:,2< I detailed my concerns on the rezoning (see attached letter dated October 26, 2006). 22 22 1 1 1 , ARMIN III •i III! III III I The rezoning request by Tyrus is exactly what has been requested by Copar for their proposed residential project in this area. As you are aware, Copar has now brought legal action against the City following denial of their project by the City. It would seem that if Tyrus is allowed to proceed forward, such action could be interpreted as arbitrary and capricious and compromise the City's legal position with Copar. % With the development moratorium now in place, It seems most logical to study the south Carver Avenue area as a whole and not allow any exceptions, Once the planning study has been completed, Tyrus, if still interested, can undertake a project that is in 2ccordance with the agreed-upon findings, Sincerely Oim Kerrig r, FTAMM 23 23 Response to neighborhood survey/moratorium variance and rezom request - south of Carver A— Page I of I t7 Attachment 1' WOMM From: Tom Horwath [THorwath@ci.ec1inamn.usJ Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 8:16 AM To: Ken Roberts 1 1 Hello Ken I appreciate an opportunity to formally respond to above mentioned subject. I do wish to make some specific comments regarding the proposaVrequests of Jamie Jensen, and some general concerns regarding any further development in the area south of Carver Ave. My famity has been living on our lot on Carver Ave, for 15 years now. We first purchased the lot 20 years ago. Our lot was selected after an extensive lot search in the east metro area. We found nothing comparable to it at that time. The large lot size, variable topography, and most important the density of trees not onty on our land, but also throughout the neighborhood. The area was, and still is, of rural character, yet so close to the Twin Cities where both my wife and I wished to live, work and raise our family. 100 wil"111N NOWN ""- 11MAINAIN1 Rr4VJL1KM;?A(;I A 61101 VIE-M-1•1:1 - SIVAPIP4 Millis gi INI 1111!! ;11111 fin 119WUN116 a a Ay 12/512006 24 24 Page I of J Attachinert 1, From: Coombs mpf@aol.com Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 10:26 AM To: Ken Roberts BEEM Thank you for the notices on the moratorium and Public hearing notice regarding Tyr Land Co. It is nice to be informed. I was not, nor am I now for or against the passing of the moratorium. But now that the City has passed it I believe it should be enforced. I do not like flip flopping around. The rules for South Maplewood change frequently and usually without any notice to those of us south of 494. 1 believe the City needs to take the time afforded by the moratorium and develop rules for south of Carver that are consistent with those of the rest of the city....and stick to them. For example; there is a 1.27 acre lot across the street from me. by should someone be allowed to build on it when I cannot split my lot down to 1,27 acre parcels*?????? Why were homes permitted to be built on the hills NW of me, interfering with my TV's and cordless phones without me being included in the decision process. The city does not allow me cable, satellite, or regular clear TV. Yet my property taxes soar because of the new homes which have all the amenities. So tell me, why should we like it when everyone wants to destroy what rural surroundings we still have. I think theTyrus land project is mostly good, Of course I would prefer its y undeveloped, but that would not be fair the the property owners who would like to sell, as many others in the area have already done. I would like to see bike trails, safely connecting the parks in South Maplewood and Woodbury, and along fish creek down to the Point Douglas Bike route, I would like to see a fire hydrant on the most eastward edge of the project on Carver Avenue. I would like to see cable access required to this area and ALL of South Maplewood. I would Like to see minimum lot sizes consistent with those in the area. I would like to see the area to have it's own water retention pond. And a tornado siren in the development or within a few blocks. I would like to see the business off the comer of Sterling on Carver removed (it has insufficient off street parking and to much traffic for a residential area), Sincerely, Douglas Coombs 2700 Carver Avenue Pa- e I of I Attachment 13 17.1 TV ZM a =- From: Connie VVi•gel [conniewiegei@r-omcast.net] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 11:55 AM To: Ken Roberts Cc: Diana Longde (External); City Council Subject: Moratorium variance and rezoning requests - St. Clair Hills Housing Development - Carver Avenue and Sterling Street RE: The Moraton*um variance and rezoning requests — St. Clair FElls Housing Development — Carver Avenue and Sterling Street (East of 1-494) Maplewood - requested by Jamie Jensen of the Tyrus Land Company. We are hopeful that the city will engage in this process fairly and transparently, in a way that the concerns and input of all parties are respected, lm� nie and Mark Wiegel II� III i t Carver Avenue 651-329-3776 1217/2006 26 W Attachment 14 From. Amy Kaiser [amy.katserChotmaii.com] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 419 PM To: Ken Robetts Cc: Diana Longhe (External) Subject: Response to Neightorhood Survey letter Dated 11-30-06 Dear Mayor Longrie, City Staff, and Council Members, This area is very unique and we must carefully consider the impact we have on the area. The residents of this area live here because this is the type of lifestyle they choose to live. I ask the Council to support the Comprehensive Plan honoring the citizens the right to live the lifestyle they choose. I also ask the Council to thoroughly survey the area for it's historical value. This needs to become a priority included with the moratorium in order to honor the Comprehensive Plans historical preservation committment. I also would like to request that in the future all land owners in the moratorium area be notified of any requests made that require a variance to the moratorium so that they may respond also. Get the latest Windows Live Messenger 8.1 Beta version. Join now. http://ideas.live.com 27 a Pa I of I At"'- 15 From: chdsienkins@usfamity.net Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 6:38 PM To: Ken Roberts Cc: hrcbailey@comcast.net; Diana Longde (External) Mr, Roberts, We are emailing you regarding the request for a variance and rezoning by Tyrus Land Company. We Q WWWW" III NOR Q1640mal va I Ir I Am v I Col ILI I [HOW Mimi! KEE= oil -I N Of Maplewood, MN 55119 651-776-1651 12/7/2006 28 E Attachment 16 RE. The Moratorium variance and rezoning requests — St. Clair Hills Housing Development — Carver Avenue and Sterling Street (East of 1-494) Maplewood - requested by Jamie Jensen of the Tyrus Land Company. MEMMM W W Page I of I Attachment 1 17 Ken Roberts From: Sue,Bonitz@deluxe.com Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:42 AM To: City Council Cc: Ken Roberts C "la7or �iA City Co.ncil i"­ t< th,u¢,k you f­ ,.jt,minq to I_L'! CL'_ ize%, of Mal l%�wncd and coz� rm the ye-Ir rr, r.x " r'' on im, --k,n :�?iud t v i t an-d 1_h to � urn,,. 71 can n, Dnly b� :�Quth �,v C,rvrer� Th�� , _,!6o to t�e! U :Med onrr ind it Should be dcl tho reque_jf for a wnrian%_ f t:h, mc:7&tcri•nn and r, by 7 Cc— Niw v =2... no_c: will w.-int on T� -, WhO1,7 �i va�r� ance unti. who�,� nr�-, i � look',­` at o;' C. - ! ryt as -C>Ianned by the m.-.),ratoriunl. awl about Tvru_ behind why tee Should 2 . t '. .. POW , fle d are 'ajt a Couple th th�_.- I f. they ware, r-,illy r on. e�lc,­Unt�­r.d any C71.irrent that, would pret to have the main rural, o- r Mr v%d X._: i kr,ow tor a !�a(_t, L c.x_je I W.- ot thU' City COUIICil Me�,. !:inq th�� nigint :Oo) that PoKe up aqain !° orur dex.elacin to�_ area, myself inelu Not to : rth of Caviar and a tou•.L. , rco 1,rcor LS.e North part of Man'ewood d. "Th _ �,3 Our p.rop, o,kck,:• to s Y �a: t : ,: ar :t a ny !7 z,nd w h.v­a V_'Iw of woodr[ and T L-ro-M every windo wc dought ner@ bec:AU33 of the fcc- -Wh i hlv­'�q CZOL-­ to th,� c* ty. juot i.3 fr-,�t oornewnot doan not m.-an w<� c. Z - . F-. c- not al'ways mean on Loo' it O­h.r -. r h -., 3b md' r CK - 0 the f.­! of the Z r�z. cr_ and t; _ .t °ur,r ° °f...:• of natn. or,. s.._4. _­ in and thi��'s prop,�,-ty ', we tho inq�.rs r.�.e _:� 'k7r and the Ot:lar Cleve' oper:- L­ c no,: ­:-��j �;pc Lon �h�j Lond every thin.g is _p roved. know t�_ey h,�v a r� P - Jht to X,-tror.-A op but to Lh way i.; zoned and reopon4;1 io in romplJ.4.inco -with OK to haavm 1,­.d '�'-at tj left a L one and to Save areas of azeat beau�_v alld that hav great- im.caot. Finollv, i ncT­,- on the c'_ry' r4�­. back �:y Ven. 'Rob.,::ts was forwardr- to by a neighb 7 um x,:,­ ��cmz rn, nutizica':-On� 1 understand that ii o 5�0 iaol. WM, �or au : , ..j no° Ly ao; far rt Ict o': - ­ , edback. it- ahould go out to the who!,± ma ez rr'n fQ '.y czAlly =os not Nrtot :a hone:;t reaporz­s. S . 12/8/2006 30 30 [IMMOI From: Bonitz Mark [Mark. Bonitz@thomson . netl Sent- Fdday, December 08, 200• 2:49 PM To: City Council; Ken Roberts Subject: Tryus Land Company Requests For Zoning Change & Variance Importance: High Page I of 3) A 18 Common sense should have dictated that at an absolute minimum, the City should have notify all of the landowners currently under the moratorium as this developer is requesting a variance from the moratorium itself. Furthermore, in response to the Try us Land Company's specific justification I submit the following for your consideration: M � 12/8/2006 31 31 Ongy i I I -am IIIIIIIIIINNO I 111 1 MI IIII I I . . ......... Page 2 of I Unless the Tryus Land Company i s proposal includes digging a moot around the property it is, not in anyway, means, shape or form an island onto itself. It is however a integrated and significant part of the whole south Maplewood picture, Let us stay the courseand work through the tasks outlined in the moratorium, • Tryus attempts to conclude that rising property valuations and taxes equate to an area's ri I peness for development. Truth is - most everyone's property evaluations and property taxes have risen in recent years due to the shifting tides of revenue away from cities and counties by the State. In response to Mr. Jensen's statement "The f reeway has sapped the area of any remaining 12/8/2006 32 a 19100� Mark J. Bonitz A proud owner of Rural Charm in south Maplewood 12/8/2006 3333 Pa-e I of I Attachment 19 -7 V . 1 Mill From: Ted L. Cyptar Investigations [ticinvesfigabons@comcast, net] Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2006 9:51 AM To: Ken Roberts Subject: st. clair hills Ap.169*61111MOMI 1 P2 Ify-I.-ItIlLs 12/7/2006 34 w Pa.ge I of I AlItachment 20 120 "M From. Pat Bailey [pat.bailey@baileynursery.com] Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 1:19 PM To: City Council: Ken Roberts Subject: Tryus Land Company Requests For Zoning Change & Variance M� +► t I'm writing to respectfully urge you to deny a recent variance and rezoning request made by the Tyr IM Land Company. I support the recently enacted moratorium, as the whole area needs to be considered with respect t Fish Creek, traffic issues, conservation considerations, and area residents' desires. I To grant any one party a variance is wrong. Let's wisely use the one-year moratorium to ensure a thoroughly well-thought In for this unique area. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Patrick Bailey 11"1 11 May" •00 k 111 11Y I I, O 35 M From: Johnson, Nona M [Nona.M.Johnson@HeafthPartners.ComI Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 3:13 PM To: Ken Roberts Cc: rayon ongre@ yahoo. com; hrcbailey@comcast.net Attachment 21 i_ is wr. # �' I III I NO 111111111111111 1 1:11 11 1111111111 1 IN I I I III To: City of Maplewood Ken Roberts — Planner Cc: Mayor Diana Longre December 6, 2006 36 36 Attachment 22 From: Claire Jensen [clairejensen@visi.com] Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 8:47 PM To: City Council; Ken Roberts Cc Diana Longrie (External) Subject: Tyrus Land Company Request for Rezoning of Carver & Sterling area, City Council, Mr. Roberts, and Mayor Longrie, 37 37 Attachment 23 Ken Roberts From- Jeff Jensen BefFjensen@upstairstechnology.comI Sent; Sunday, December 10, 2006 8:47 PM To: Ken Roberts Cc: City Council; Diana Longrie (External) Subject: Fish Creek area moratorium and zoning change requests Additionally, the existing road infrastructure cannot handle the increased traffic load. When the Wakota bridge project caused the routing of traffic up Sterling, just getting on Sterling from our street, Haller Lane E, was regularly difficult in the morning, waiting for an entrance spot in the illegally speeding traffic. That time period was enough insight to understand the inadequacy of the existing roads and the impact of the speeding traffic. Still, the Bailey and Sterling intersection is a problem. Please uphold the existing moratorium and the zoning of RlR; we must not destroy the look and feel of this area, and must use the granted time to cohesively plan together. Sincerely, Jeff Jensen 2533 Haller Lane E Maplewood, MN 55119 M Attachment 24 To: City of Maplewood Ken Roberts - Planner Ken. Roberts@ CI. Maplewood.ivIN.US Cc: Mayor is Lon re mavorlonue!: December 5, 2006 RE The Moratorium variance and rezoning requests - St. Clair Hills Housing Development - Carver Avenue and Sterhng Street (East of 1-494) Maplewood - requested by Januie Jensen of the Tyrus, Land Company, Sincerely, PZj-Ij-I9I—C-I?-i—(Z:RAaI_jA 2553 Haller Lane 39 39 Pacl,e I of 2 A 25 2564 Halter Lane Maplewood, MN 55119 (651) 714-9742 From-, Bonitz Mark Serrt, Friday, December 08, 2006 2:49 PM To. 'ritycouncil@ci.mapiewood.rnn.us'; 'Ken Roberts' Subject! Tryus Land Company Requests For Zoning Change & Variance Importance: High Earlier this week I was made aware that the Tryus Land Company submitted a combined request for a zoning change and variance to the current development moratorium in south Maplewood, I was not made aware of this by the city even though I live in the area of south Maplewood that is under the current moratorium. Someone needs to review the City of Maplewood's notif ication policy, I can assure you f rom comments of other concerned residents the policy is not working! Common sense should have dictated that at an absolute mioirntim, the City should have notify all of the landowners currently under the momtorium as this developer is requesting a variance f rom the moratorium itself. 1 111111 11111111111111111111 11 ! : 1 � � I 111 1 � � 1 0 . I 11P11 12/1 1/2006 40 M Page I of I Attachment 26 I oppose the Moratorium variance and re-zoning request by Tyrus Land Company for the St Clair Hills Housing at Carver and Sterling. lon for Me area Mat Incli area, 12/7/2006 41 41 Attachment 27 Ken Roberts It is our desire that Mr. Jensen's request be denied. Sincerely, Greg and Carol Thompson 1525 Haller Ct. S. '-japlewood, IM 55119 42 42 Page I of I Attachment: 28 MM041 From: JucaerbQaoi.corn Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 11 PM To: City Council; Ken Roberts Subject: Request for Valance /So. MpNvd Respeeffully, Carl Erb 2354 Heights Ave. E. Maulew(�. N-5644-9 43 M Attachment 29 RE The Moratorium variance and rezoning requests — St. Clair Hills Housing Development — Carver Avenue and Sterling Street (East of 1-494) Maplewood - requested by Jamie Jensen of the Tyrus Land Company. MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL Attachment 30 7:01 P.M., Monday, August 25, 2003 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 03-18 A. CALL TO ORDER: A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:01 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present Proposed R- I (R) Zoning District Code Amendment (Second Reading) a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following Ordinance 840, which adds a rural residential (R -1 (R)) zoning district (with a two -acre minimum lot size): ORDINANCE NO. 840 AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE R-1R (RURAL SINGLE-DWELLING RESIDENCE) ZONING DISTRICT THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: (Deletions are crossed out and additions are underlined.) Section 1. This section changes Section 44-9 as follows: Section 44-9. Zoning districts. The city is hereby divided into the following zoning districts: F, Farm Residence District. R-1, Residence District (Single Dwelling). R- I R, Rural Sinjzle-Dwellimz District. R- IS, Small-Lot Single-Dwelling District. R-2, Residence District (Double Dwelling). R-3, Residence District (Multiple Dwelling). R-E, Residence Estate District. 45 City Council Meeting 08-25-03 NC, Neighborhood Commercial District. CO, Commercial Office District. BC, Business and Commercial District. LBC, Limited Business Commercial District. BC(M) Business Commercial Modified District. SC, Shopping Center District. M-1, Light Manufacturing District. M-2, Heavy Manufacturing District. Section 2. This section adds new Sections 44-117 through Section 44-150 as follows: J. DIVISION 3.5 R -1(R) RURAL SINGLE-DWELLING DISTRICT Sec. 44-117. Intent. Maplewood intends to protect and enhance the character of areas of the city that, because of topography or other factors, do not have, nor does the city expect to have, municipal sanitary sewer or water service. To allow for and to protect a very low density, semi-rural, residential life style, the city creates the R- I R zoning district. This zoning district is for the areas of Maplewood that are not suitable for suburban or tract development because of topography, vegetation or other factors that make the installation of municipal sanitary sewer unlikely. The city finds the most suitable use of these areas is single dwellings on large lots. Such low-density residential development will lessen grading and soil erosion and will help protect ground water, vegetation and wooded areas. The lots and parcels in the R- I R zoning district are generally much larger than those in the R -1 (single dwelling} district and those with municipal sanitary sewer and water. Sec. 44-118. Uses. The City shall only allow the following uses. Lal Permitted uses: (1) Any permitted use in the R-1 District, subject to its regulations. (b) Conditional uses. The City may permit the following by conditional use permit: (1) Anv use allowed by conditional use permit in the R -1 (single dwelling) District. (2) Commercial farming or gardening, including the use or storage of associated equipment, when on a property with a single dwelling. (3) Stands for the sale of agricultural products grown or produced on the property. (4) Metal storage buildings, commonly known as pole barns or agri-buildings, subject to the applicable size and height requirements. Lc) Prohibited uses. The city prohibits the following uses in the R -1(R) zoning district: (1) Accessory buildings without an associated single dwelling on the same property. (2) Reserved. 46 City Council Meeting 08-25-03 Sec. 44-119. Height of buildings. The maximum height of a single-family dwelling shall be thirty-five (35) feet. Sec. 44-120. Lot dimensions, lot area and width requirements. La) No person shall build a single dwelling on a site less than eighty seven thousand one hundred twenty (87,120) square feet (2 acres) in area and (b) Each lot or parcel shall have enough area or usable space for a house, driveway, well and an individual sewage treatment system (ISIS), including two drainfields. (c) No person shall build a single dwelling on a lot with less than one hundred twenty (120) feet of width at the front building setback line. (d) Each interior lot or parcel shall have at least sixty (60) feet of frontage on an improved public street. (e) Each comer lot or parcel shall have at least one hundred (100) feet of frontage on each of the public streets. Sec. 44-121. Front yards. (a) Each dwelling and any accessory structure(s) shall have a front yard setback of at least fifty (50) feet. Except that: (1) If each of the lots next to an interior lot has a dwelling, the minimum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling closest to the street. The maximum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling farthest from the street. (2) If subsection (a)(1) above does not apply and there is a predominant setback, a dwelling shall be no further forward and no more than five feet to the rear of the predominant setback. (3) Regardless of the above, if the city council has approved special setbacks for a development, those setbacks shall apply. City approval of a prelimingy plat with building pads does not constitute approval of special setbacks. (4) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. (b) The director of community development may allow a different front yard setback if the propose setback would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions apply: (1) The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of adjacent homes. (2) The proposed setback would save significant natural features, as defined in section 9-188. (33) The proposed setback is necessary to meet city, state or federal regulations, such as pipeline setback or noise regulations. 47 City Council Meeting 08-25-03 (4) The proposed setback is necessary for energy saying, health or safety reasons. Sec. 44-122. Side yards. Each dwelling and any accessory structure(s) shall have side yard setbacks of at least thirty (30) feet from a side property line. The following exceptions to this standard shall apply: (a) The side yard on the street side of a corner lot shall have a width of at least fifty (50) feet. (b) When a property owner uses two (2) or more adjoining lots as a single-building site, the side yard requirements shall apply only to the outside lot lines. (c) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. Sec. 44-123. Rear yards. (a) Single dwellings shall have a rear yard setback of at least twenty (20) percent of the lot depth or a minimum rear setback of fifty (50) feet, whichever is larger. (b) Accessory buildings shall have a rear yard setback of at least thirty (30) feet. Sec. 44-124. Tower, antenna and flagpole setbacks. Towers, antennas and flagpoles for residential (non-commercial) use in the R -1(R) zoning district shall meet the same setbacks as accessory buildings in the R -1 (single dwelling) district. Sec. 44-125. Minimum foundation areas; room requirements. (a) The minimum foundation area shall be at least: (1) A one -story dwelling, nine hundred fifty (950) square feet. (2) A one and one-half story dwelling, seven hundred twenty (720) square feet. (3) A bi-level dwelling, eight hundred sixteen (816) square feet. (4) A tri-level dwelling, seven hundred sixty-five (765) square feet. L5J A two-story dwelling, five hundred twenty-eight (528) square feet. (b) Room size and number shall be consistent with the standards of the International Residential Code. Sec. 44-126. Building-width requirements. The minimum building width on any side shall be at least twenty-one (2 1) feet. The building width shall not include entryways or other appurtenances that do not run the full depth of the building. Sec. 44-127. Accessory buildings. Lal Section 44-114 (Accessory buildings) in the R-I District shall U121Y to the use and hei)Zht of accessory buildings and garages in the R -1 R zoning district. 48 City Council Meeting 08-25-03 (b) For lots of at least 2 acres in size in the R-1R zoning district, the following size standards shall apply to accessory buildings and garages: Detached Buildings Attached Garages Combination of detached (maximum area) (maximum area) buildings and attached (square feet) (square feet) garages (maximum area) 1,400 (garages) 1,400 2,800 1,100 (other buildings) Section 3. Section 44-128 - 44-150. Reserved. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes-All 49 City Council 08-25-03 lei TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19,2006 Chairperson Fischer called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. 11. ROLL CALL Vice-Chairperson Tushar Desai Commissioner Mary Dierich Chairperson Lorraine Fischer Commissioner Michael Grover Commissioner Harland Hess Commissioner Gary Pearson Commissioner Dale Trippler Commissioner Jeremy Yarwood Absent Present Present Present at 7:03 p.m. Present Absent Present Absent Staff Present: Ken Roberts, Planner Lisa Kroll, Recording Secretary Saint Clair Hills Development (Carver Avenue, east of 1-494) (Development Moratorium Variance and Rezoning (R-1(R) to R-1) (7:06 — 8:24 p.m.) Mr. Roberts said Mr. Jamie Jensen, representing Tyrus Land Company, is requesting city approval of a variance to a moratorium and a zoning map change. He is asking the city for these approvals for the undeveloped property on the south side of Carver Avenue east of Sterling Street. On November 13, 2006, the city council gave second reading to a moratorium ordinance for many of the properties south of Carver Avenue. The adoption of this ordinance by the city council prohibits any development or subdivision of any property south of Carver Avenue that the city has zoned F (farm residence) and R -1(R) (rural residential). This moratorium includes the properties in this request. Mr. Jensen is requesting a variance to the moratorium so the city may consider a zoning map change for the property. The city cannot consider the zoning map change for the property with the moratorium that is now in place unless the city approves a variance to the moratorium. Mr. Roberts added that the state statue requires the city to notify residents within 350 feet of a project site but staff extended the area to all those within 500 feet from this proposal and to all those on Carver Avenue between 1-494 and Century Avenue. Staff received one comment for the proposal and 24 responses against the proposal including the e-mail that was handed out prior to the start of the planning commission meeting from Joe and Michael Bailey. Chairperson Fischer asked if the planning commissioners had any questions for staff? Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 12 -19 -06 No questions were asked of staff. Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant to address the commission. Mr. Jamie Jensen, Developer, Tyrus Land Company, 2483 —15 St NW, Suite C, New Brighton, addressed the commission. He said he's here to request the change in the zoning from R -1(R) to R and the removal of moratorium in south Maplewood. It is his position to find out what the city requirements are in order to develop property in Maplewood. He said if he meets the requirements he should be allowed to develop his property in Maplewood. He said in this case he thinks he meets the requirements and should be able to proceed with development. The zoning requirement is R -1(R) which requires a 2 -acre minimum for the development. He read from page 5 of the south Maplewood sewer study the proposed land uses in south Maplewood assuming that the area will be served with sanitary sewer. In areas where sanitary sewer is not installed, the city may want to consider modifying the land use to more of a rural residential use with the minimum lot size as discussed before. The first step is to get sanitary sewer, if you can't get sewer than you look to the larger lot size. Then you would ask, what has the city told developers as far as the import of sanitary sewer? Mr. Jensen said the first thing he looked at was the city utility code which reads at 40.96 any building used for human habitation or for human occupancy located on property lying inside the city shall be connected to the municipal sanitary sewer system within one year from the time that a connection is available to any such property. Additionally, all buildings constructed within the city on property adjacent to a sewer main or in a block through which the sewer extends shall be provided with a connection to the municipal sanitary sewer system for the disposal of all human waste. Sanitary sewer is number one. They're not looking for individual sewer systems. Looking further under the rules of subdivision 34 -10 section 11, it states: Before an individual sewer treatment system may be installed, the city manager decides that city sanitary sewer is not available. He said that is another indication that the sanitary sewer system comes first, when available. Sanitary sewer is available to this property and staff has indicated that the sewer connect is about 400 feet away from the property in question. He put a map on the overhead showing this area in (sewer area 70 as shown on the Maplewood sewer map). He put the sewer as- builts on the overhead to represent where the end of the city sanitary sewer line and where the water main extends. (To him this represented that the sanitary sewer line and water main are available to his property.) He said he went to the engineering department with this plan when he first proposed it and the engineering department said the sewer and water services are well within the proximity to the property. He said under the City of Maplewood's ordinances, as the developer he is required to use the city sanitary sewer and water services if there is a sewer line to the property. He said this map is from 1996, 7 years before the R -1(R) designation was even put in. Why is this area indicated as R-1 (R)? Why is there a two lot minimum in this area? This would have come from the sewer study in 2003. The city map shows this area as sewer area 70. Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 12-19-06 Mr. Jensen said the south Maplewood sewer study on page 2 states, there are 8 districts within this study area which include sewer district 50, 51, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 and 58. Sewer district 70 is not part of the south Maplewood sewer study and shouldn't have been made R-1 (R). However, it was touched on when the sewer study was done. In an earlier memo from Ken Roberts, it states for district area 70 a gravity sewer can serve district 70 and the sanitary sewer flows from the 240 - acre Bailey Nursery parcel in Woodbury and Newport serve it. When the city or a developer extends the municipal sanitary sewer services to serve district 70, the new pipe must be sized large enough to serve the 240-acre parcel of Bailey Nursery. The Carver Lake interceptor is large enough and the interceptor can be attached. Now he has a property where the city requires the developer to use sanitary sewer, it's zoned for 2 acre lot minimums, which you don't use sanitary sewers for. Now he is stuck between a rock and a hard place. This property should never have been zoned R -1(R) and should have remained zoned R-1 and must follow the Maplewood rules regarding the utilities and subdivisions and use sanitary sewer. Then we come to the south Maplewood moratorium question of whether or not this property should be removed from the south Maplewood moratorium or left alone. The question is that the moratorium is put in place to study the area to find out what it should be and in this particular case there is nothing else the property could be zoned. The zoning rule 44.9 gives 7 different zoning districts. The zoning districts are (F)Farm, (R-1 (R) if that ever gets put in), R-1, R-1 (S), R-2, R-3 R-E. This property has to be zoned either R-1, R-1 (S), R-2 or R-3 for single family, twin homes or multi-family. He said at this point he is asking for the lowest density allowed where sanitary sewer and water are present. With the moratorium the question becomes, what can this property ever be which is R-1(R). Because of the sanitary sewer it will have to be zoned R-1, it is not going to end up being R-E or R -1(R) because if it is, then you will have to have individual sewer systems where sewer and water are available which would violate the city code. He's looking to be steered one way or the other. The Maplewood rules say you have to use the sewer and water connection because it is there, if the sewer is available, you can't use individual sewer systems, and if you don't use individual sewer systems, you have an R -1(R) district. A delay would be expensive to sit on property for 1 year to wait for the moratorium to be lifted when nothing is going to change. He would request that the zoning be changed from R -1(R) to R-1 and that the moratorium be lifted from this area. Commissioner Trippler said in the research that you did, did you read any language that says the city is required to have lots smaller than 2 acre lots whether there is sewer there or not? Mr. Jensen said he hadn't read such language, he has looked for something that would be that abundantly clear, but he couldn't find anything. Commissioner Trippler asked if he thought the city had the authority and the right to create a zone that allows 2 acre lots? Mr. Jensen said yes, where there is no sewer or water service. Commissioner Trippler asked where the code makes that distinction? Planning Commission -4- Minutes of 12-19-06 Mr. Jensen said it doesn't make it that clear, it would be nice. It would be inferred from the language that he read from the south Maplewood sewer study, the proposed residential land uses assume that the areas will be served with sanitary sewer. In areas where sanitary sewer is not installed, the city may want to consider modifying the land use to a more rural residential use. That is a back door way of trying to get there. It's sort of assumed, which is always a mistake, then you are going to have an R-1 zoning where there is city sewer and water. Where there is no city sewer and water you can't have R-1 zoning, but it doesn't say here is sewer so you can't have a 2-acre lot. People can buy land and put city sewer and water in but it wouldn't be anticipated that would be the case. He wished it was that clear. Commissioner Trippler said if you acquired a piece of property in this area which was a 2 acre lot and you built a house on it and you put in city sewer and water would that be a possibility? Mr. Jensen said yes it's possible, but it's enormously expensive. Commissioner Trippler said the development you are proposing doesn't in any way, shape or form fit in with R-1(R) zoning designation; it doesn't fit in with the neighborhood, or with this area of Maplewood. Why wouldn't you make a proposal if you wanted to develop this property to have 2 acre lots with a house on each 2 acre lot? Mr. Jensen said that would not make financial sense. He knows the city can disregard any financial considerations but it's no secret that he's in it for the commercial purpose. He is trying to bring the property, as any developer would, to its highest and best use. Having two 2 acre lot minimums with sanitary sewer is nowhere near its highest use. In the future, the Bailey Nursery property is going to develop into many parcels and if they go with R-1 zoning that would be 720 homes within several hundred feet of this property. If they go with higher than R -1(R) zoning they could build over 1,000 homes. Mr. Jensen said everything in the city's documentation says, the Bailey Nursery property development is coming, be ready for it and be ready with the sewer system. This Bailey Nursery property isn't even in Maplewood but your documentation says "be ready for it". But the documentation says lets get ready for the future development. He's on the road "to" the future Bailey property and he would like to get started. What Maplewood is saying is you are going to be required to have 2 acre minimum lots until the Bailey family decides to sell, then Maplewood will bring the sewer line up to the property and charge you (the developer) for it. When the sewer line goes "by" his property he will be assessed as it goes up to Bailey Nursery property, but in the interim he has to sit on 2 acre lots and he said that isn't fair. Planning Commission -5- Minutes of 12-19-06 Commissioner Trippler said Mr. Jensen is jumping the gun considerably. The purpose of the moratorium as he understands it's to give the city the opportunity to look at the R-1(R) zoning classification and decide if it applies, if the city wants to maintain the R -1(R) zoning in this area of Maplewood then the city council will do that. It's very likely he thinks, given the tone of the city currently, that the R -1(R) zoning will remain in south Maplewood whether there is sewer here or not. He firmly believes the comprehensive plan is going to be changed to reflect the R -1(R) zoning which should have been changed in 2003 when it was first proposed and put into place. Whether or not the Bailey Nursery property becomes the next downtown or not is beyond Maplewood's control. That property is located in Woodbury, not in Maplewood. What we do have control over is this area of south Maplewood where Mr. Jensen wants R-1 zoning in an area the city has zoned R-1 (R). In Mr. Jensen's letter all he read was a justification for why it should be zoned R-1 and he didn't see any justification as to why it should be given a variance from the moratorium. Mr. Jensen said there were two letters, and he asked if the commission got the second letter? Mr. Roberts said the latest letter from Mr. Jensen is on page 12-14 of the staff report. Commissioner Trippler said the letter he sees in the staff report is dated November 14, 2006, number 1., application for zoning change, number 2., variance regarding south Maplewood moratorium. Commissioner Dierich asked if this property went from (F)Farm to R -1(R) zoning? Mr. Roberts said he couldn't recall what the property was zoned in 2003. Commissioner Dierich remembered that was what it was zoned. Which means when Mr. Jensen bought this property he knew it was zoned R -1(R) right? Mr. Jensen said correct. Commissioner Dierich said when she proposed the first moratorium in south Maplewood in 2003 as a planning commissioner the commission thought this property should be zoned R -1(R) rather than (F)Farm. She asked if there was any reason why as the developer you would have purchased this property thinking you could come to the city and tell the planning commission that the City of Maplewood would "have" to connect your property to the sewer line when the planning commission had no intention of doing that? We did the south moratorium sewer study to make sure that the city was correct in assuming that there was not going to be sewer in that area and that is why sewer area 70 was not included. Mr. Jensen said he doesn't know what this panel had in mind at that time but the Maplewood written code says if there is sewer available, you connect to it. Commissioner Dierich said that is correct, "if" there is sewer "to" the property, you connect to it. But there "isn't" sewer "to" this property, so there is no reason for the city to hook you up to the city sewer and water. She said she doesn't understand your rational or your logic for that. Mr. Jensen said the sewer connection is within 400 feet of this property, which means it is accessible to the property. Planning Commission -6- Minutes of 12-19-06 Commissioner Dierich said it's accessible but it is not "on" the property and there is no requirement for the city to hook you up. Mr. Jensen said you as the city are not allowed to put sewer "on" my property without my permission so there would never be sewer on my property. You would put it "near" my property and I could connect to it. Commissioner Dierich said the sewer would be put in the street in front of your property and currently it is not in the street in front of your property. The planning commission intended when we decided on this zoning to keep the property "rural" in character and you knew that coming into this. In her mind, Mr. Jensen either has to wait the moratorium out or sell this property. The city would love to let you do whatever you want to do with this property but we have put a moratorium in place to study this to make sure we as a city are doing the correct thing for this particular area. In her mind he has not given her or the commission any rational as to why we should let you have an exception to the moratorium and nobody else. Mr. Jensen said you mentioned keeping the property "rural" in character. He said he has been through the code and couldn't find any definition of what "rural character". If Maplewood has elements of "rural character' in the code he would like to see it. Commissioner Dierich said she lived three houses down from this property for 20 years and she knows it's rural in character, so don't tell her it isn't. Mr. Jensen said he is not speaking to her personally, he is just stating the city code does not specify a rural character. Commissioner Dierich said the city has a rural code and has put that in place. We have zoned these particular pieces rural, whether you found it on the website or not, it's there. Mr. Jensen said he has read the entire Maplewood code and it's not in there. Commissioner Dierich asked staff for assistance. Chairperson Fischer asked if it's in the code or if that is one of the pieces we were having the moratorium to put into place properly? Mr. Roberts said the R-1 (R) zoning code was adopted in August of 2003 and whether it has been put in all the updates and put on the website he can't speak to that. Planning Commission -7- Minutes of 12-19-06 Mr. Jensen said he has looked and looked for that. Mayor Longrie had relied on the wording semi rural character and when that became part of the R -1(R) zoning in 2003 the wording said in order to maintain the semi rural character of the property. Being an attorney himself, and knowing to look for that, the rule is; if there is a conclusion there must be a finding of fact, if there is a finding of fact there had to have been a study, if there was a study there must be somebody that requested it. So he went back to look for it and discovered there were no conclusions made, there were no findings of fact, there was no study, there was no one that requested it, there is no semi rural character law in Maplewood. It's a declaration, but if this were to go to a court the court would say as every court has ever done, if Maplewood says there is a rural character, show us the definition of rural character in Maplewood. There is none so the courts would say, if you the City of Maplewood have this in your R -1(R) zoning, what does semi-rural character mean? The city didn't study it, you didn't conclude it, and therefore there is no "rural" character. Commissioner Dierich asked if Mr. Jensen owned this property in 2003? Mr. Jensen said no. Commissioner Dierich said then you don't know about the three or four meetings the planning commission had where they discussed this rural character and the rational behind it. The planning commission looked at this code and passed it on to the city council. Mr. Jensen said there is no "rural character" in Maplewood. Commissioner Dierich said that's your opinion. Mr. Jensen said he would ask for the findings then. Commissioner Dierich said the information is available in the planning commission minutes from the meeting in 2003. As an attorney you did a great job finding the codes so far. You can go back and look for the 2003 planning commission minutes and the city council minutes and you will see that. Chairperson Fischer asked staff where this information may be in writing? Mr. Roberts said the planning commission and city council minutes would be available on the internet and there should be copies of the staff reports available. Commissioner Grover said it sounds like you aren't going to find a favorable planning commission for this request. He said there is a difference of opinion here. Mr. Jensen thinks that having sewer and water accessible 400 feet away from where he wants to build means the city should connect him to the utilities. He asked what the city's responsibility is in terms of sewer and water connection for a development. Mr. Roberts said the Engineering department told staff that a feasibility study would have to be done to see where things are now and how the sewer and water would need to be expanded there and at what depth and size the pipe would need to be. That level of detail has not been done yet. Commissioner Grover asked how long a study like that would take? Planning Commission -8- Minutes of 12-19-06 Mr. Roberts said he would guess three to four months. As a caveat the feasibility study would need to be ordered by the city council. The city Engineering department can't just start feasibility study on their own. Commissioner Hess said the overhead showed the diagram of a sewer profile in the area or as- builts and Mr. Jensen was saying the 400 foot differential was more like 50 feet from there. Mr. Jensen said he was only guessing, he didn't have a ruler on that map. That was based on how wide his property is and how wide the neighboring property is and was only an estimation. That was the as-built map. You would have to get the original size from the engineers and use an engineer's ruler. This is a reduced sized map that was used for faxing and is not to scale. Commissioner Hess said regarding the south Maplewood moratorium, one of the items listed in the staff report regarding the findings for a variance is item b. which states The application fora variance shall set forth special circumstances or conditions that the applicant alleges to exist and shall demonstrate that the proposed subdivision or development is compatible with existing or proposed land use and zoning. Based on the current zoning and the code as it is, what is it that you the developer felt was an undue special circumstance for the variance request? Mr. Jensen said the special circumstance was that the utilities were brought up to the property. This property is within the City of Maplewood yet there is constant reference to the Bailey Nursery property even though it isn't part of the study area the 240-acre parcel located southeast of Carver Lake was reviewed to determine the sewer service should be provided from Maplewood. The parcel is owned by Baileys Nursery and is located in Woodbury. So what Maplewood is saying is we are going to set a sewer line for property that isn't even located in Maplewood to do not what "you the developer" wants but whatever the "future" Bailey Nursery property owner wants. If the future developer wants to build high rises they can do that and Maplewood will supply them with the sewer connection. But as the developer of this property in Maplewood you have to get your own sewer connection and these need to be 2 acre lots which is an expensive option and not financially feasible for him and Maplewood isn't going to allow you to take this property to the highest and best use. The city staff has stated a feasibility study will have to be done. Yes, there would have to be a feasibility study if the "city" put the services in. If he as the "developer" puts the sewer service in there would be no need for a feasibility study and he could move forward. He said he came to the Maplewood Engineering department and said he wants to put the sewer in and the city said "they" would prefer to put the city sewer and water in because the city has the Bailey Nursery property in mind. If he would be delayed 6 months due to the need for a feasibility study, then he will move forward on his own. He said he doesn't need a feasibility study to tell him if this can be done or not. Commissioner Hess asked Mr. Jensen if he had a copy of the ordinance from August of 2003 that shows the R-1 (R) zoning designation? Mr. Jensen said yes. Commissioner Hess said on page 11, Section 44, discusses lot sizes. He said it seemed odd to him that Mr. Jensen subdivided the parcels into 14 lots that should have been proposed as two 2- acre lots. Planning Commission -9- Minutes of 12-19-06 Mr. Jensen said yes. On page 10, 44-117, states this zoning district is for the areas of Maplewood that are not suitable for suburban or track development because of topography, vegetation or other factors that make the installation of municipal sanitary sewer unlikely. So, once again the city is stating if there is sewer available we connect to sewer, if we don't have sewer then we follow R -1(R) zoning. Commissioner Hess said he thinks you have to look at the "character" of this land. Mr. Jensen said you can look at the character if the city has a written rule about character, but they don't. Commissioner Hess said he thinks that is what the R -1(R) zoning states. Commissioner Grover said if there isn't sewer available the zoning is R -1(R) and that's what we have here. Who would pay for the sewer and water connection for development if this connection was extended all the way to Woodbury? Mr. Roberts said the size and location of the sewer pipe would be studied as part of the feasibility study. The connection may not be extended all the way to Woodbury but if the connection were extended farther east, the pipe may have to be sized and set at a certain depth so that the connection could easily be extended in the future without tearing up any recently installed pipe. So in 5 or 10 years from now, if there was a need for the sewer and water connection, it would be ready to connect. As far as who pays for the sewer and water connection, the sewer users pay, the benefiting property owners pay, and the city pays the Metropolitan Council who runs the metro area sewer system. As Mr. Jensen said, there is a sewer interceptor under Carver Avenue and the sewer pipes would be extensions from that, which would also require permits from the Metropolitan Council for those extensions. Commissioner Grover said in terms of developments throughout the city, is it the policy of the Public Works department to allow developers to do their own sewer work? Mr. Roberts said in more recent years it has been the city's policy and direction that the city does the sewer improvements and extensions where there are public improvements on public streets. If there are developments on private streets like a townhome development, the policy has been more to allow the developer to install the private sewer system because the sewer system would be maintained by a private association. The direction for public extensions and public streets would be done as a public improvement project with the city coordinating the work. Commissioner Trippler asked staff to put the zoning map on the overhead screen. He asked Mr. Jensen if he knew what (F) zoning was? Mr. Jensen said yes, (F) stands for the Farm zoning district. Commissioner Trippler asked Mr. Jensen if he would agree Farm zoning is associated with more rural areas then downtown central business district areas? Mr. Jensen said as I stand out on the street, I would agree, but looking at the law, I wouldn't agree. The (F)Farm you have in Maplewood has no lot limit which could mean a lot 10 X 10. There is no requirement for size, frontage, depth, size of house, length of driveway, or anything. Planning Commission -10- Minutes of 12-19-06 Commissioner Trippler said even though the zoning map shows (F)Farm zoning surrounding this property you still contend that this has no "rural" characteristics whatsoever? Mr. Jensen said you indicate "rural" characterization as something we should all "get". A city is not permitted to just "get" it, it has to be a written rule. He has to be able to refer to the city code and say what is the definition of "rural" in character and show him what is the written code for rural. There is very little of it in here anyway. There is no written law. If you were to say "rural" character he would say there has to be a cow or something on the property, it has to be a farm, or wording like that but Maplewood has no such thing. When he looked at the property to purchase it he saw semi-rural character. He asked himself what is rural character, what is semi-rural character, there is none. Commission members keep referring to minutes that represent what was discussed but minutes are not laws, and discussions are not laws either. Commissioner Trippler said only an attorney could look at lots zoned (F)Farm and conclude that it has no "rural" character to it. Chairperson Fischer asked if one of the reasons we went to the moratorium in south Maplewood was that some of the intent, zoning, and terminology were not in sync with each other and the moratorium gave the city more time to put that together. Mr. Roberts said that is part of what will be studied. Commissioner Dierich said she is having trouble understanding why we are arguing about sewers connections and whether this is rural or not rural. The city made a decision to have R -1(R) zoning here and made a decision not to put sewer or water in that area at this point and have upheld that decision for a fairly long time now. Her mind has not changed since the city made that decision. The same houses are in the same neighborhood, things look the same there and the question she has is shall we break the moratorium or not? It's wonderful Mr. Jensen that you are able to link together obscure pieces of the ordinances in order to try and make your case and hope this goes your way. But you haven't made your case for the planning commission to break the moratorium. Unless she hears something that makes the commission want to break the moratorium she isn't sure why we are discussing the other things peripheral to the issue. Commissioner Trippler asked if there was anything in the Maplewood ordinance that require the only application of R -1(R) is in areas where there are no sewers? Mr. Roberts said he didn't know if it was specifically written like that. Clearly the intent for the R- 1(R) zoning was for non-sewered areas. It could be applied elsewhere, but that was the primary intent for it. Commissioner Trippler asked if it was written in any of the Maplewood ordinances that if you have sewers you can't have R -1(R) zoning? Mr. Roberts said no. Mr. Jensen said all the rules relative to development have to be America is the Land of the Free. He said this is his property to do with what he wants, subject to the city of Maplewood's reasonable "written" rules. Planning Commission Minutes of 12-19-06 Commissioner Dierich said the rules are written. Staff will have to dig them out and give them to you Mr. Jensen. Mr. Jensen said those rules can be upheld as long as they are reasonable. Once there is sewer to the property and once you come up with R-1 (R) zoning that says "where sewer is not available", you have the larger lot size. It then becomes incumbent on the city to say why he can't have it, then the burden changes. At this point he said he is requesting the change in zoning and the removal of the moratorium. He said he can see where his request is going. He turned to the audience and said the audience came to comment on this request. Chairperson Fischer asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak regarding this proposal. Mr. Jim Kerrigan, 2620 Carver Avenue, Maplewood, addressed the commission. His letter is attached in the staff report on page 10. He said he is opposed to the request to remove the moratorium and the request to change the zoning. Mr. Kerrigan said part of the reason for the moratorium is to take a look at the area and the zoning and determine if there needs to be a new zoning classification. Mr. Jensen said there are too many limitations on this property. City's need to look at their land use laws and see what is best for the area. Mr. Jensen said he is being treated unfairly. If Mr. Jensen can prove that in court he doesn't think Mr. Jensen would win his case. Commissioner Grover asked if the city had ever granted a variance in any other area in the city that had a moratorium? Mr. Roberts said a variance was granted in 2001 for a parcel of land by Maplewood Mail where the old Bennigan's Restaurant is. There was a moratorium on property from the east side Southlawn Drive to the west side of Hazelwood Avenue and from Beam Avenue to County Road D. The parcel was an outiot that was part of the shopping center and the city council felt the use was consistent and nothing was going to change and the council granted the variance request. Chairperson Fischer asked staff if the were any moratoriums that ended early or if there were any moratoriums that went longer than anticipated? Mr. Roberts said most of the moratoriums have gone the full length of time and some moratoriums have even gone longer. Mr. David Ledo, 14511 Oakhill Road N., Scandia, addressed the commission. He is the personal representative for the Ledo family that own the five acres immediately to the west of the proposed development. At the present time he is neither for nor against the moratorium because this property isn't for sale, but in the next few years it will be. His aunt is in a living trust and when the trust is dissolved he will be forced to sell. His question is, has anything been started to study the area for the moratorium yet? Mr. Roberts said the moratorium was put in place in November. Staff is preparing to start on this and doesn't think anything substantial would be completed for at least 6 months. Commissioner Grover asked if that precluded the Ledo family from selling the property? Planning Commission -12- Minutes of 12-19-06 Mr. Roberts said the Ledo family can sell their property; they just need to be aware of the moratorium. Mr. Ron Cockriel, 943 Century Avenue N., Maplewood, addressed the commission. He said thank you for putting the moratorium in place and suggesting this to the city council. There are many issues with this property in south Maplewood. Everyone with property in this area wants to know what they can do to maintain what property they do have in this area or sell it to be developed. These are real questions that hopefully the moratorium will address these questions. Let's get the information out there and spend the time to determine what the highest and best use of this property is and what the city wants done with this property. As property owners will need to know what they can do and if they can afford the taxes on their property. There was a Ramsey County Open Space sign on this property for about 30 years and recently that sign as well as other open space signs are now down and he wondered what happened to the signs. He wants to make sure the moratorium remains so the city can study the area and determine what is best for the property owners. Mr. Mark Weigel, 2720 Carver Avenue, Maplewood, addressed the commission. He said part of the reason for the moratorium is to answer the questions that are being raised. How is the moratorium study going to be done and are the neighbors going to be part of this study? The developer has also stated this property isn't rural in character because a highway runs through the property and there are supposedly planes flying overhead. Mr. Roberts said staff doesn't have the full report regarding how this moratorium study would be done. There are many interested people in the area so the city would be silly to not include these people in the process. It has not been decided yet how the study would be done or who would be involved in the study. The city is aware there are many people very concerned and the neighbors have a lot of good ideas and know things that would be good for the city to be aware of. Mr. Weigel said he would suggest the city widen their range of notifying the neighbors in the area to keep everyone involved and aware of the study and the plans for the area. Commissioner Dierich said staff needs to look the property behind Mr. Weigel, those people behind Mr. Weigel have an easement for sewer from the Bailey property, as do the people down the hill and the people down the hill from those people. Before the city can begin to think about puffing sewers in here we need to think about disturbing all these property owners. She doesn't see this happening. Especially since Joe Bailey stated he is not selling his property and has no intention of selling at this point. Mr. Mark Bonitz, 1635 Sterling Street South, Maplewood, addressed the commission. His letter is on page 31 of the staff report. He requested that the city continue to move forward with the moratorium and deny the variance request. There is a lot of work ahead and a lot of work behind us. At this point, to do anything else would do a discredit. He said he grows tired of developers like Mr. Jensen. They have a right to develop property, but when they purchase property knowing what the zoning is, it seems there is this attitude of entitlement and that gets him riled up. Mr. Bonitz said there has been no effort that he has seen on Mr. Jensen's behalf to engage the neighborhood why doesn't he say "let's work together and figure out how we can make something better", so this doesn't sit well with him. Planning Commission -13- Minutes of 12-19-06 Mr. George Gonzalez, 2359 Heights Avenue, Maplewood, addressed the commission. He lives in the moratorium area but he knew nothing about this application, proposal or tonight's meeting until he heard about it by word of mouth. The 500 foot notification area in a rural neighborhood like this is a problem. There could have been a lot more than 20 people here tonight if all the residents in Maplewood would have been notified about this meeting and been given a chance to respond. The Bailey family couldn't be here tonight because of a funeral in California. He thanked Commissioner Trippler for his knowledge of the zoning laws and the raw character of this land. He hopes the city will keep the moratorium in place. To lift the moratorium for one developer would only mean other developers will be asking for the same thing. Commissioner Grover asked how many people live in the moratorium area? Would it be too difficult to notify a larger area regarding upcoming proposals? Mr. Roberts said it wouldn't be "impossible" to do. Commissioner Trippler said it occurred to him that many of the people communicated to staff through e-mail. He recently logged on to the city website and he was able to go through the government notification process where you can get notices sent to you via email each time there is a notice put on the city website. He asked staff if it would be possible to set something similar up like that for people who live in this area of the moratorium so they could log in and request notices are sent to them via e-mail to them whenever something comes up? Mr. Roberts said staff would have to check on that with the IT staff. Commissioner Trippler said it's a free service. He said as much as it would be nice to notify everyone in the city of Maplewood that can be an enormous expense at .39 cents a piece. If the city could send something electronically that could be a good way of handling that. Commissioner Hess asked if there is something that we can put in the language to expand from the notification area from 500 foot property for large parcel areas like this where the lots are large in order to alert more people because he has heard that complaint during other proposals too. Mr. Roberts said state law only requires the city to notify people within 350 feet of a site. The city policy has been to expand that notification area to 500 feet. Whether its 600 feet or 2 miles there are people that think they should be notified about a proposal. He has heard there are people that are interested in knowing what is going to happen in the moratorium area. He has a hard time understanding the direct concern of people living on Haller Lane regarding a development on Carver Avenue. He understands how it affects the people that live within the moratorium but the people that live in the area that is zoned RE-40 and are not subject to the moratorium. The land around them is subject to the moratorium and the area could change as development may or may not develop in the future. We as a staff have to make judgments as to who to mail information to. Word of mouth has been a great way to spread the news. If there are people that want to be added to the mailing list they should let staff know. There may be a way to notify people electronically, staff doesn't know but could check with IT. Commissioner Dierich said if staff would have stayed within the 500 feet notification area that would have included 5 neighbors. She reminded staff that people in south Maplewood don't have cable and internet access is not as easy as you would like to believe. Planning Commission -14- Minutes of 12-19-06 Mr. Vince Bastiani, 2513 Haller Lane, Maplewood, addressed the commission. He said he's in support of the moratorium and he agreed with staff's comments and conclusions. Mr. Jensen mentioned in his proposal that there are two airports that have flight patterns over this neighborhood, which isn't true. He said he's a private pilot himself and those flight paths go over the refinery in Cottage Grove and this area doesn't see jet planes. Only small business jets fly in and out of the downtown St. Paul airport. We aren't even in the defined area for FAA for the downtown St. Paul airport. He noticed a month ago during the hearing for the moratorium that Mr. Jensen said he didn't have a problem with the moratorium. Now a month later he's back "requesting" a variance as the developer of this property. Mr. Jensen said he's a private pilot as well and the runways that serve downtown Minneapolis are class B airspace which is 5 miles on either side of the center line so it would be within it, it is not within the class D airspace of St. Paul but it is within the flight plan of that district. He said he did not have trouble with the moratorium at the previous hearing. Mr. Greq Thompson, 1528 Haller Court S., Maplewood, addressed the commission. He's in favor of the moratorium. We are concerned not only for the rural character of the area but for the traffic in the area as well. There are two ways in and two ways out of this area. One is on Sterling Avenue and the other is Carver Avenue. If we put this many houses on this street and then other development is added, soon you will have 400 to 500 houses in this area. Haller Lane is already dangerous when you come out onto Sterling Street and he said he couldn't imagine if another 60 houses were built with additional cars driving on this stretch of road with a speed limit of 35 mph even though people drive faster than that. Chairperson Fischer asked if anybody else in the audience wanted to speak regarding the public hearing. Nobody came forward. The chair closed the public hearing at 8:23 p.m. Commissioner Grover moved to deny the request of Jamie Jensen for a variance from the development moratorium forthe property south of CarverAvenue and east of Sterling Street. This variance would allow the city to consider a rezoning request for the properties in question. City staff is recommending this denial because: 1. Strict enforcement of the moratorium ordinance would not cause an undue hardship to the property or to the property owner. 2. There is no special circumstance or conditions in this case that warrant the city approving a variance to the moratorium. 3. The proposed rezoning (and then the proposed subdivision) would be premature and would not be compatible with the land use and zoning designations. 4. The proposed rezoning and subdivision would not meet the spirit and intent of the moratorium ordinance. Commissioner Grover moved to deny the proposed zoning map change for the proposed Saint Clair Hills development on Carver Avenue. City staff is recommending denial because: Planning Commission -15- Minutes of 12-19-06 1. The request does not meet all the criteria required by the city for a zoning map change. This is because the city cannot determine if the proposed zoning change would have any negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities. 2. Staff is recommending that the city not grant the variance to the moratorium. The moratorium prohibits the city from considering rezoning or development requests, unless the city approves a variance to the moratorium. Commissioner Trippler seconded. Ayes— Dierich, Fischer, Grover, Hess, Trippler The motion to deny passed. Chairperson Fischer said the planning commission makes the recommendation to the city council and the city council makes the final decision. This item is tentatively scheduled to go to the city council on January 8, 2007. Agenda Item L.9 To: City Council From: Greg Copeland, City Manager Date: January 4. 2007 Re: 2007 Membership Dues Payments to the Municipal Legislative Commission and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (Metro Cities) Please find the attached information on the above referenced organizations and their 2007 legislative agendas. (Copies have been requested from Metro Cities and will be distributed upon receipt.) Dues for the City of Maplewood are now payable for 2007 in the following amounts: Municipal Legislative Commission $9,070.00 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (Metro Cities) $8,987-00 Recommendation: Adopt a motion authorizing payment of 2007 dues for each organization. gagdfivt We ewt I I N The Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) was established in 1984 and now provides a voice for the more than 718,000 residents and over 482,000 employees who work in thirteen suburban communities. These communities share common demographic, economic and tax base characteristics. They also face similar challenges associated with development and maintenance of public infrastructure, and increasing demand from residents and businesses for effective public services. Our communities also have a number of differences: some are growing rapidly while others are fully developed; some are almost exclusively residential communities while others contain significant commercial developments. Despite these differences, our communities share a common philosophy with respect to the relationship between the state and local units of government. We believe that: The Legislature must constantly strive to develop policies promoting greater stability and predictability in the fiscal relationship between the state and local units of government. • When it is possible and efficient to do so, public services should be provided by the level of government closest to those affected. • The system created by the State to finance city services must be equitable, accountable and straightforward. Our communities pledge their support of a comprehensive approach to addressing ongoing challenges such as public safety, transportation, economic development, and affordable housing. In order to succeed in these endeavors, local governments must be provided with effective tools (including financial) and the flexibility to use them without unfunded mandates from other units of government. The MLG urges its legislative delegation to be mindful of the following guiding principles when deliberating on tax, finance or regional growth initiatives: • In order to promote accountability, local government finance should demonstrate a strong relationship between taxes paid and benefits received. • Unfunded state mandates, levy limits, property tax freeze and reverse referenda significantly limit the predictability necessary for local governments to plan with financial confidence. • Cities characterized with high property values are not universally populated with high-income residents. Populations in all of our cities include retirees on fixed incomes, single parents and apartment dwellers. Policies that ignore such diversity are not equitable. • Any tax reform creates burden shifts on individual taxpayers and potential revenue shortfalls for communities and should be recognized and addressed by the state in order to maintain the stability of our local governments. MUNICIl'AL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION (MLC) Member Cities M ayors Apple Valley Mary Hamann - Roland Bloomington Gene Winstead Burnsville Elizabeth Kautz Eagan Mike Maguire Eden Prairie Phil Young Edina Jim Hovland Lakeville rally Dahl Maple Grave Mark Steffenson Maplewood Diana Lon.grie Minnetonka Jan Callison Plymouth Kelli Slavik Shoreview Sandy Martin Woodbury Bill Hargis KEY MLC LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES I. Enhance the circuit breaker program with additional tax relief funding A. Allows property tax relief to be targeted to individuals 11. Adequate level of transportation funding for cities and counties A, Need to increase the Highway Trust Fund and would support: 1. License tab adjustment 2. Moderate gas tax increase 3. Consideration of a referendum on a region wide sales tax dedicated to transit and highways 111. Local control and accountability (MLC opposes levy limits) A. Decision making at the city level is highly visible and local officials are accountable to their voters IV. Full reimbursement of MVHC in 2.007 and acceleration of payments to March and September (currently received in October and December) 2007 MLC LEGISLATIVE AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS 1. Support for Local Control and Accountability A. MLC opposes levy limits III. Strengthen State and Local Fiscal Relationship A. Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) 1. Full reimbursement of MVHC in 2007 2. Accelerate MVHC payments to March and September (currently received in October Et December) 3. Direct payment to homeowner B. Better Information for Property Tax Payers 1. Inclusion of "effective tax rate" on TnT notices and the property tax statement 2. Department of Revenue annual report on property taxes paid as a percentage of income C. Targeting Property Tax Relief to Individuals 1. Enhance circuit breaker with additional tax relief funding 2. Support limited market value phase out D. Reexamine Fiscal Disparities - improve program E. Oppose Sales Tax on Local Government Services Ill. Adequate Level of Transportation Funding A. Support MVST dedication at 6016 for highways and 40% for transit B. Support long-term funding plan, including the following revenue sources that reflect local-. needs: 1. Referendum on a region wide sates tax dedicated to transit and highways 2. Adjust license tab depreciation schedule 3. City wheelage tax (clarifications to existing statutory authority) 4. Gas tax increase 5. Dedicate MYST revenues from (eased vehicles to transportation 6. Local option for transportation utility fees 2007 LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES The top three priorities of the Municipal Legislative Commission for the 2007 legislative session are: 1. Support for Local Control and Accountability 11. Strengthen State and Local Fiscal Relationship 111. Adequate Level of Transportation Funding 1) SUPPORT FOR LOCAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTABILITY MLC cities support policies that promote local control and accountability. Decision making at the city level is highly visible. Member cities hold regular council meetings (at a minimum of once per month) and are all open to the public. Agendas for these meetings are published in advance and proceedings may be viewed on local cable television and the internet. The Truth in Taxation component of the annual budget process also promotes local accountability by providing residents with advanced notice of property tax impacts of proposed local budgets as well as an opportunity to express their concerns at a public hearing. The MLC opposes any additional state limitations on local decision making or unfunded mandates that inhibit cities' ability to plan with financial confidence, specifically: A) THE IVILC OPPOSES LEVY LIMITS MLC cities receive no LGA. Our cities residents and property owners provide nearly all the revenue for city services through property taxes and fees. Imposing artificial caps (i.e. levy limits, property tax freeze or taxpayer satisfaction survey) while limiting sources of revenue, removes the autonomy needed for city officials to make decisions in the best interests of their fellow citizens. These limitations on local decision making are inconsistent with local accountability and prohibit municipalities from planning with fiscal confidence, 11) STRENGTHEN STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RELATIONSHIP A) MARKET VALUE HOMESTEAD CREDIT Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHQ is a state funded program designed to reduce the property taxes paid by qualifying homeowners. Under state law, homeowners receive a tax credit on their property tax statement equal to 0.4 percent of the property's market value, up to a maximum credit of $304. The credit is reduced for homes valued over $76,000 until the credit is fully phased-out for homes valued over $414,000. In 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 the MVHC was cut to selective cities, particularly those not receiving local government aid (LGA). These cuts had a significant financial impact to the communities that were targeted (see attached chart for impact to MLC cities). FULL CITY REIMBURSEMENT OF MVHC The MLC supports current state law which restores full MVHC reimbursement to all cities in FY 2008. 2) ACCELERATE MVHC PAYMENTS TO CITIES The MVHC is currently paid to cities and other local units of government in October and December. The late state payment in the city's fiscal year forces cities to have larger than necessary cash reserves in order to meet expenses until the state dollars are received. Accelerating the MVHC payments to March and September would assist all cities in more effectively managing cash flow (particularly because cities do not receive property tax receipts until June and November). The MLC supports an enhanced government finance partnership with the state through earlier MVHC reimbursement dates. 3) DIRECT PAYMENT OF MVHC TO HOMEOWNER The MLC supports paying the MVHC directly to the homeowner. Under the current MVHC program, the state acts like a property tax payer by reimbursing the local units of government for the value of the MVHC (it is actually part of the certified levy). Thus, if cuts are made to the program, it is the local unit of government that fails to get reimbursed, not the homeowner. In short, the MVHC program does not produce additional revenue for the city like the local government aid (LGA) program, The MLC believes that the state should fund its property tax relief program and be honest with the property tax payer. As a result, the MLC supports changing the administration of the MVHC program by eliminating local units of government from implementation and providing for a direct credit or payment to the individual homeowner. A direct payment to the homeowner would promote accountability for MVHC funding and allow for a more truthful property tax statement. Bogja � 1:10101ageig 413"IEX4 The Truth in Taxation program provides excellent parcel specific information for taxpayers regarding property tax impacts (i.e. valuation changes or local government spending decisions). However, taxpayers or policy makers have no easy method to compare the property taxes they pay, other than in dollars, with homeowner property taxes in other jurisdictions. Since property taxes are based on the value of the property, meaningful comparisons are very difficult. Throughout the country, tax policy analysts have used "effective tax rate" as the method of comparing property taxes from one state or jurisdiction to another. Effective tax rates are expressed as the percentage of the property tax (not including special assessments) to the value of the home. For example, a $1,100 property tax on a $100,000 home would have an effective tax rate of 1.1 %- 1) INCLUSION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATES ON THE PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT MLC supports including the "effective tax rate" on Truth in Taxation notices and on property tax statements. Effective tax rate information would provide homeowners a better sense as to whether tax changes were a result of shifts from changing property values or from spending decisions. For the first time, taxpayers would have a useful too] to compare their taxes with any other Minnesota homeowner. 2) IMPLEMENTATION OF A PROGRAM THAT WOULD ANNUALLY REPORT PROPERTY TAXES AS A PERCENTAGE OF INCOME MLC supports requiring the Department of Revenue to annually report the homeowners property taxes paid as a percentage of income (community average) for cities with a population greater than 5,000. C) TARGETING PROPERTY TAX RELIEF TO INDIVIDUALS Even though MLC cities receive no local government aid, MLC has supported an LGA program that allows each city to provide a basic level of municipal services without an overbearing level of taxation. MLC supported the 2001 property tax reforms that compressed and simplified the rate structure in an effort to build better equity and accountability into the property tax system. MLC also supported the 2003 LGA formula changes which made significant progress in bringing all cities "on formula" (eliminating grandfathered aids). MLC believes that property wealth is not the most appropriate measure of "ability to pay" property taxes. As residential home values have rapidly escalated over the past several years, tens of thousands of Minnesotans, particularly seniors on fixed incomes, would not financially qualify to purchase the home in which they live. I ) ENHANCE THE CIRCUIT BREAKER PROGRAM MLC supports additional property tax relief to those in greatest need by directing additional dollars to the circuit breaker program. The effectiveness of any state appropriations for LGA beyond the rate of inflation should be evaluated against adding those dollars to the circuit breaker. Numerous studies have concluded that state aid to cities is not an efficient method of property tax relief. Too often, the aid results in additional government spending that many would argue goes beyond providing the "basics". On the other hand, the circuit breaker income adjusted property tax relief program provides direct assistance to those homeowners in greatest need. 2) LIMITED MARKET VALUE PHASE OUT MLC supports current law which fully phases out limited market value in 2008 for property tax payable 2009. D. REEXAMINING FISCAL DISPARITIES Many arguments used in support of the original fiscal disparities law in the early 1970's may no longer be valid. After 35 years, MLC believes it is appropriate for the legislature to reexamine the fiscal disparities program. k 1 p:191tif -.741 The MLC supports a comprehensive transportation funding package that considers and plans for future local as well as state transportation and transit needs. Minnesota must have a sound roadway system to remain economically competitive in agriculture, manufacturing, tourism and general commerce as well as an efficient and affordable transit system that can deliver people to and from employment locations. A) STATUTORILY DEDICATE WST REVENUES MLC was supportive of a constitutionally dedicated source of funding for transportation and supports early legislative action to statutorily dedicate 60% of MUST revenues to highways and 40% to transit. B) LONGTERM TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PLAN MLC believes transportation funding legislation should provide a fair and equitable revenue collection system and therefore supports the following policies: • Increase in highway and bridge funding • New County State Aid (CSAH) distribution formula that directs greater construction dollars to growing and congested counties • Adequate funding sources for efficient metropolitan transit systems • Authorize additional trunk highway bonding to accelerate the removal of metro highway bottlenecks and complete unfinished freeways 2) REVENUE SOURCES MLC supports the following revenue sources to meet transportation goals: • Referendum on a region wide sales tax dedicated to transit and highways • Adjust license tab depreciation schedule • City wheelage tax (clarifications to existing statutory authority) • Gas tax increase • Dedicate MUST revenues from ]eased vehicles to transportation • Local option for transportation utility fees Apple Valley 1,112,293 1,112,293 995,786 927,277 4,947,649 Bloomington 1,696,959 1,630,492 1,488,406 1,457,082 6,272,939 Burnsville 1,305,009 1,231,999 1,149,237 1,117,746 4,803,991 Eagan 1,223,402 1,153,562 1,036,072 950,135 4,363,171 Eden Prairie 843,982 763,466 629,029 544,939 2,789,416 Edina 528,756 452,522 372,664 366,784 1,720,726 Lakeville 656,230 656,230 656,230 620,167 2,588,857 Maple Grave 988,270 979,793 854,734 782,234 3,605,031 Maplewood 268,296 268,296 268,296 268,296 1,073,184 Minnetonka 787,036 706,708 621,952 574,855 2,690,551 Plymouth 737,392 689,350 634,691 569,134 2,630,567 Shoreview 480,123 428,437 372,956 352,546 1,634,062 Woodbury 902,448 857,007 793,349 720,423 3,273,227 MLC Cities Total: 11,530,196 10,930,155 9,873,402 9,251,618 41,585,371 State -,vide totals: 20,032,915 19,011,465 17,549,411 16,645,066 73,238,857 MLC Cities 1 of State -wide Totals: 57.61 57.5% 56,31 55.61 56.81 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities MISSION ME-7 CITIES Page I of 2 is to represent the collective interests of all metropolitan area cities on metropolitan issues and statewide issues with metropolitan significance ABOUT METRO CITIES Metro Cities is the only metro-wide service and lobbying organization representing cities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Our membership currently consists of 76 cities from all 7 metro counties, that make up more than 85% of the metro area's population. A DMINIS TRA 11 VE S 1W UC TURE Metro Cities is governed by a 19-member Board of Directors and served by a four-person staff. Board membership is comprised of local elected and appointed officials representing each class of city, and is geographically distributed to reflect the composition of our membership. Metro Cities represents metro cities before the Metropolitan Council on sues such as comprehensive land planning, zoning, transportation, growth, housing, wastewater and water resources, and livable communities Metro Cities represents metro cities before the Legislature on transportation funding, economic development, housing, LGA and other state aids, property taxes, tax increment financing and other issues with metro and statewide significance. Metro Cities provides a forum for policy development with four committees (Municipal Revenues, Metro Agencies, Housing/Economic Development and Tra nsporation /General Government) comprised of local officials and staff that meet annually to develop policies that guide Metro Cities in its representation of city interests before the Legislature and Metropolitan Council. http://wxvw.amm 145.org/about 11412007 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Page 2 of'-) Metro Cities provides important services to its membership, including the on-line Newsletter, Bill Tracker, License and Permit Fee Survey, the MN Local Government Salary and Benefits Survey, and staff support for the Metro Area Management Association (MAMA). POLICY DE "EL OPMENT A vital function of Metro Cities is to provide a forum for policy development and consensus building that allows city officials to deepen their awareness and understanding of other communities, collaboratively problem solve, and develop consensus based policies. As the only general purpose metro-wide city organization, and with membership that includes the central cities, inner ring and developing suburbs as well as freestanding communities, Metro Cities is uniauetv suited for this task. METRO CITIES RELATIONSHIPS WITH LMC AND THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL While Metro Cities is affiliated with the LMC and routinely cooperates on important issues, our mission is separate. A key distinction is the Metro Cities work with the Metropolitan Council. Metro Cities, created subsequent to the Council, coordinates with and monitors the Council's work on a range of issues and responds as appropriate to protect the interests of metro cities. Although, Metro Cities and LMC work collaboratively on a wide array of city issues with metro and statewide importance, there have been and likely will be issues where our metro focus will dictate a different approach. littp://Nv , , vw.amml45.org/about — tis/niissioii.litm 1/4/2007 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Click here ,r L 6 it? orinalion on becomijkz, a Aleti Cities Alenlbei -L- Metro Cities Membership List 1. Adibelt-vi He! 2. Anoka I AP-P-Le -valley. 4. Arden Hills 5. B tiy p t qu 6. Blaine 7. Bloorninuton 8. Brooklyn -Center 9. Brooklvn Pack 10. BUrnsvitle 11. Qlqrnplill 12. Chanhassen 13. Chaska 14. Circle Pines 15. Colunibi " a Heights 16. Coon RaPA-s 17. Cotta Ye Grove 18. Crystal 19. D a yton 20. Eagan aj 1 21. Eden Prairie 22. Edina 23. Excelsior 24. Falcon Hei-fits 25. Farmin -0 0 - 11 26. Forest Lake 27. Fridley 28. Golden Valley 29. 1-1,,istin is 30. Hopkins 31. II- Ittgo 32. Inkpe.ndence 33, Inver Grove FIM I ghtts 34. Lake Elmo 35, Lakeville 36. Lauderdale 37. Lmg Lake 38. Malitomedi 39. MaoleNvood 40, Me Lake 41. Mendota He4dits A) . Minneapolis KI-1-11m -06 43, Minn * etouka 44. Minne ' t - rista 45. Nqw-R ghton 46. Newport 47. North St. Paul . ......... 48. Oak Park Hts. 49. Oakdale 50. Orono 51. Osseo 52. Plyn:iouth 53. Prior Lake 54, Ramsey 55. Richfield 56, Robbinsdate 57. Rosemount 58, St. Anthony 59. St. Francis % SItII,L-Q-uj-s-P.qIIr,Ik 61. St. Michael* 62. St. 1','ILII 63. St. Paul Park 64. Savage 65. 'ShIalkolpec 66. Shorewood South - St- Patti 68. Spt ing Park 69. Sunfish Lake 70. Three Rivers Park District* 71. Waconia 72. Wayzata 73. W est S t P aul il 74. White Bear Lake 75. Woodbury 76- Woodland * Associate Member Become a Metro Cities Member ... Page I of 2 All cities in the seven - county metropolitan area who are members of the League of Minnesota http://w 114/2007 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Metro Cities Policy Committees Metro Cities has four standing committees, which develop the organization's policy positions based on input from representatives of member cities: I. Housing com ic _QeveIQPL1!_e1_1t 2. Municiliaumveiiiie vrax-ation 3, Tran BSc Gencral 4. Mctropgli�tanAteneies Officials of any member city may serve on a committee of their choice. Each committee annually submits policy recommendations to the Board of Directors for review, modification and distribution to the general membership. The general membership meets in November before each legislative session to debate and adopt the official Metro Cities positions for that session. In matters of legislative policy, each member city has one vote, plus one additional vote for each 50,000 population or major fraction thereof above the initial 50,000. Legislative policy requires a two-thirds affirmative vote of the members present and voting to be adopted. The Liousing and Economic Development Committee considers all issues related to economic development and housing, including subsidized housing, affordable housing and activities of the Metro Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). It also reviews all amendments to the Met Council's Housing Guide.Policy Chapter and develops policy dealing with economic development issues, HRAs, tax increment financing (TIF) and development authorities. The MkY11,i_Qi,PA[Rgygmies Colli.iii,itte.e considers any matter concerning city revenues, property taxes, and city expenditures, including state aid formulas and dollars, levy limits, property tax assesments and fiscal disparities. The Transi)ortation and General Legislation Committee considers all major issues related to air and surface transportation, including funding sources at all government levels. Members of the AMM Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) are encouraged to join. along with other city officials. This committee has developed policy on issues such as municipal consolidation. pensions. PERLA, comparable worth, data privacy, contractor licensing and local control/authority. This committee also considers all major issues that have an impact on metropolitan area cities outside the scope of other AMM committees. This includes issues such as municipal consolidation, pensions, PERLA, comparable worth, data privacy, contractor licensing and local control/authority. The Metropolitan At-yencies Committee considers legislative issues and other policies related to the Met Council and metro agencies. It monitors the structure and relationship between the regional and local units of government Page 1 of 2 http: / /www.amm /committees /committees.litm 1/4/2007 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and reviews amendments to the Metro Development Guide Policy Chapters. It has previously developed policy on land use planning, solid waste management and the Met Council selection process. It reviews the council's yearly budget and this year will monitor the policies and plans being developed to implement the Regional Blueprint. Page 2 of 2 littp://www.amm145.org/con 1/4/2007 Agenda Item L -10 To: City Council From: Greg Copeland, City Manager Cl Date: January 5, 2007 Re: Citizen Advisory Boards and Commissions Policies 2007 Board/ Commissions Vacancies Please be advised that all members of Citizen Advisory Boards and Commissions whose tern have expired were notified that if they wished to continue to serve in those capacities they should reapply. All vacancies have been posted on the City Website and News Releases have been sent to the Pioneer Press, Star Tribune and the Maplewood Review soliciting applications from interested citizens. We expect applications from any interested citizens to be returned by January 26, 2007. We will schedule interviews with the City Council on January 29"' beginning at 5:00 p.m. and have reserved February 12 at 5:00 p.m. to continue interviews if necessary. The first appointments could be made at the February 12"' City Council Meeting. There are openings on the following City Commissions/Board: Community Design Review Board — 4 openings Community Outreach Commission — 7 openings Housing Redevelopment Authority - I opening Parks and Recreation Commission — 3 openings -.*t Planning Commission — 3 openings -*.- Police and Civil Service Commission — I opening Election of Commission Chairs In April 2004 the City Council decided that the Chairs of Commission would be selected by the City Council except for the Police Civil Service Commission in which the chair is determined by State Law. When the City Council on September 11. 2006, adopted the Environmental and Natural Resources Commission Ordinance it specified that the Commission members were to gogeMeA We ('an, January 5, 2007 choose their officers at the first meeting. Given that action I would recommend the City Council repeal the 2004 policy and direct Commissions to select their own officers annually after the City Council has made the new appointments to each Board/Commission in order that all members of the advisory bodies have an equal vote in determining their leaders for the next year. City Council Contacts for Boards/Commissions The 2004 policy also assigned a City Council member to be the contact person for the Council. I recommended staff liaisons for each board /commission and from an administrative standpoint believe that is all that is needed as the boards/commissions all report their actions/recommendations to the City Council as a whole. Appointment of City Employees as Members of City Boards/Commissions The question has also been raised regarding the appointment of City Employees to Citizen Advisory Boards/Commissions. The Police Civil Service Commission by state law does not allow members to be employed by the city. No City Employees have yet applied for an appointment to a board/commission. In order to involve more citizens in the advisory process and broaden the overall participation in these boards/commissions beyond insiders at City Hall the Council could follow the Police Civil Service Commission model and require appointees not be city employees at the time of appointment, Cable TV Broadcast of All City Boards/Commissions In order to ensure that all meetings of City Council Advisory Boards /Commissions are available for all citizens to view by live cable TV broadcasts or broadcasted at a time available in the GTN Channel 16 schedule all commission meetings will be held in The City Council Chambers. The meeting schedule below has been developed to allow for this improvement in public access and will be effective February 1, 2007. Advisory Body Community Design Review Board Community Outreach Commission Environmental & Natural Resources Commission Historic Preservation Commission Housing and Redevelopment Authority Parks and Recreation Commission Planning Commission Meeting Day/Time Staff Liaison/Phone Number 2 " and 4"' Tuesday 6:00 p.m. Shane Finwall 651.249.2304 4 Wednesday 7:00 p.m. Heidi Carey 651.249.2104 I" Thursday 7:00 p.m. Dewey Konewko 651.249.2330 3" Thursday 7:00 p.m. Pauline Staples 651.249.2105 2" Wednesday 7:00 p.m. Tom Ekstrand 651.249.2302 3` Wednesday 7:00 p.m. Karen Guilfbile 651.249.2002 1" and 3' Tuesday 7:00 p.m. Ken Roberts 651.249.2303 N Memorandum To: City Advisory Board Members CC: Maplewood City Council From: RichuodFurmxun Date; April IL2OU4 Re: New Advisory Board Appointment Policy Tile Maplewood City Council recently adopted a new policy for how board appointments are made. As membership on tile City Council changes, policies are often amended to reflect new views or methods tn address certain issues, 7n this case, the City Council has mudc some changes oil ]low m interview and appoint members m the various advisory boards. /\ copy of this policy imattached. The inost significant change is that the City Council will now interview all candidates, instead of having each board do it. ln addition, the City Council would ask each board or commission *submit questions to ask tile candidates and to send a representative to participate in tile interviews, Another change is that the council will also appoint chairs for each commission and they will serve a two - year term. Chairs can 6e re-appointed after two years but they would have 1obcrenmn|uatrd and re- selected bythcCounoi).Thiudocsnotapp|ywothcPn|iceCivi|ServicnCommisuion.os(boir rotations and chair appointment im governed by State law. Tile City Council also established a contact person for each advisory board or commission. The Council wants to establish o closer working relationship with the boards. They believe that having m specific Council-inernber contact will enhance communication and provide a way to share inh»nnu1inn. Tile current Council contact appointments are uyfollows: Planning Commission and {ZlRE- WU|Rnss6«6h, JnckioMonuhan'Juook, Police Civil Service- Bob Human Relations Commission and Environmental Commission. KadhyJuencmnon` and the 04mrv\(mppau. These uppoinonootu will remain iuplace through 2005. If you have any questions about tile new policies, please contact tile, orumernber of tile City Contwb Harriet Rydel City of Maplewood City Managees Office IM E County Road B Administrative Assistant Maplewood, MN 55109 Phone 651249,2051 Fax 651.2491059 Pr The City of Maplewood is seeking applications from citizens who would like to volunteer their time to serve on City Council Citizen Advisory Boards and Commissions. There are openings on the following City Commissions/Board: ❖ Community Design Review Board -4 openings Community Outreach Commission — 7 openings -*e Housing Redevelopment Authority - 1 opening Parks and Recreation Commission — 3 openings ❖ Planning Commission — 3 openings ❖ Police and Civil Service Commission —1 opening You can download a City of Maplewood Commission Application at www.cj.maplewood.mn.us. or call 249-2051, Harriet Rydel, Senior Administrative Assistant to the City Managers Office to have an application sent to you. Applications should be retumed to the City Hall by January 15, 2007. Information about each of the Commissions/Board is available on the website. I For Release 8 a.m., December 22, 2006 Together We Can CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM NAME: DATE: r_116 V PHONE #: Work: Home: E-mail: You may attach a resume or other summary of your background and experience for appointment to this Commission. I On which Board or Commission are interested in serving? (please check) 0 Community Design Review Board 0 Housing & Redevelopment Authority El Community Outreach Commission 0 Parks and Recreation Commission 0 Environmental & Natural Resources Commission 0 Planning Commission 1:1 Historic Preservation Commission n Police and Civil Services Commission 2. How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? 1 Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes C] No 4. Please list specific reasons why you would like to serve on this Board or Commission? 5. Do you have any specific areas of interest within the Board's or Commission's scope of responsibilities? 6. List any community organizations or activities in which you have recently or are now an active participant. Please share any additional comments on why you should be selected by the City Council. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC EXCEPT FOR HOME AND WORK TELEPHONE NUMBERS AND E-MAIL ADDRESS. Return or mail this application to: city of Maplewood, 1830 County Road B East, Maplewood, MN 55109 I I �Iconunlssions,c Dal Inis Sion , General In rormi I iodBoards &- CoM MIS Sio as Applicra ion doc 120806