HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996 06-24 City Council Packet6- 20 -96:
4:30 -5:00 PRE— AGENDA MEETING
5:00 P.M. IiRA INTERVIEWS
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, June 24, 1996
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 96 -12
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Co ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting 96-11, (June 10, 1996)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
EA. PRESENTATIONS
141 HRA Appointment
f. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City
Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these
i tems . If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item w i l l be
removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Highwood Fifth Addition Final Plat (O'Day Street)
3. Conditional Use Permit Review - Carefree Cottages of Maplewood - Phase III ( Gervais
Avenue),
4. Resolution Approving Financing of a Joint Ice Arena
5. Resolution Supporting Community Oriented Policing Grant Program - Hiring New Officers
6. Resolution Supporting Community Oriented Policing Grant Program - Overtime )
7. Cash Connection Charge Objection, 2471 Forest Street
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M.: Century Avenue, north of Highwood Sanitary Sewer, Project 95 -11 ( 4 -vote
item)
2. 7:15 P.M.: Heather Ridge (Ariel Street)
Land Use Plan Change (R -3M to BC -M)
Zoning Map Change (R -3 to BC -M)(4 -vote item)
Conditional Use Permit
Design Approval
3'',o 7:30 P.M.: Ramsey County Golf Dome (Ripley Avenue and Van Dyke Street)
Conditional Use Permit
Setback Variance
Design Approval
I I I
4. 7:45 P.M.: MDG Properties Office /Warehouse /Manufacturing Building (Cope Avenue)
Conditional Use Permit
Parking Reduction Authorization
Design Approval
H. AWARD OF BIDS
16 1995 Bituminous Overlay Project
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Ramsey County Land Conveyance
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Lower Afton - McKnight- Londin Traffic Study
2. Sterling Street, Project 93 -08 - Final Payment
I
3. Upgrade of Video /Cablecast Equipment in Council Chambers
4. Notice of Termination of Fire Service Contracts
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
L COUNCIL PRESENTATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
N. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, June 10, 1996
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 96 -11
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Ma P l ewood, Minnesota was held in the Council
.
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C ROLL CALL:
Gary W: Bastian, Mayor
Sherry All enspach, Councilmember
Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember
George F. Rossbach, Councilmember
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
1. .Minutes of Meeting 96 -10, (.May 20, 1996)
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Me, eti'ng No., 96 -10
( Ma y 20. 1996) as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
Ayes - all
2. Minutes of June 3, 1996 Council /Manager Workshop
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the minutes of Council/Ma_na�ger
Meeti of June 3. 1996 as „presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers
Allenspach, Carlson, Koppen
Nays None
Abstain - Councilmember Rossbach
E.. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
F2 Delete
F6 Amend recommendation per memo distributed
Ll High School name
L2 North Suburban Tobacco Compliance
L3 Mayor's Forum
M1 Closed Session - Fire Contract Negotiations
Seconded by Carlson
Ayes - all
1 6 -10 -96
EA. PRESENTATIONS
NONE
F. CONSENT AGENDA
• d b Councilmember Kmen:_ a es a l Councilmember Rossbach moved, seconde vv
rove the Consent Agenda, Items F1._ and F3 thru F15,,- as reco mmended.
(Item F -3 was deleted from Agenda.
1. Approval of Claims
Approved the following claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 86,047.11
$ 111
$ 180
$ 148,547.85
$ 53
$ 459,582.12
$ 625
PAYROLL.: $ 322
$ 268 560.31
$ 48
$. 17.142.37
$ 657
$1,.282,771 95
Checks #6366-#6375 Dated 5 -9 -96 thru 5 -14 -96
Checks #25669- #25784 Dated.5 -21 -96
Checks #637646395 Dated 5 -15 -96 thru 5 -22 -96
Checks #25719 - #25896 Dated 5 -28 -96
Checks #6396-#6407 Dated 5 -23 -96 thru 5 -29 -96
Checks #25905-#25990 Dated 6 -4 -96
Total Accounts Payable
Payroll Checks Dated 5 -17 -96
Payroll Checks Dated 5 -31 -96
.Payroll Deduction Checks #52275- #52287 Dated 5 -17 -96
Payroll Deduction Checks #52616- #52622 Dated 5 -31 -96
Total Payroll
GRAND TOTAL
2. Maple Woods Estates Third Addition Final Plat (Ripley Avenue and Myrtle Street)
DELETED
3. Conditional Use Permit Review - Crestview Forest Townhouses
(Mailand Road and Sterling Street)
Reviewed and approved a one -year renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for
the Crestview forest Townhomes.
4.
Conditional Use Permit Review ISD #622 Service Center (1801 Beebe Road)
'Reviewed and approved renewal of the Condition
Revi a pp al Use Permit at 1801 Beebe
Road to be reviewed again only if a problem arises or the owner requests a
major change.
N
2 6 -10 -96
5. Conditional Use Permit Review - City and County Credit Union (1661 Cope Avenue)
Reviewed and approved renewal of the Conditional Use Permit at 1661 Cope
Avenue, to be reviewed again only if a problem arises or the owner requests
a major change in the permit.
6. Conditional Use Permit Review - Corner Kick Soccer Center (1357 Cope Avenue)
Reviewed and approved renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for the Corner
Kick Soccer Center, to be reviewed again only if a problem arises or the
owner requests a change to the permit.
7. Conditional Use Permit Review.- Holy Redeemer Church (2555 Hazelwood)
Reviewed and approved until November 11, 1996, renewal of the Conditional
Use Permit for Holy Redeemer Church
8. Approve Lot Split: Lots 8 & 9, Block 1, Kohlman Lake Overlook
Authorized staff' to complete an administrative lot split, granting the
southern 15 feet of Lot 9 to Lot 8 on Walter Street, creating a 90 -foot and
a 186 -foot lot, with the understanding that frattalone /Mogren will create,
at their expense, a landscape berm to be approved by the City's Park and
Recreation Director.
9. Therapeutic Massage License: Personal Touch Massage Center, 705 North Century
Approved a license for Ida Unser and Joyce Harris to operate a therapeutic
massage center under the name of Personal Touch Massage Center, at 705 N.
Century Avenue.
1001995-1996 HRA Annual Report
Accepted with thanks the 1995 -1996 Annual Report of the Maplewood Housing
and Redevelopment. Authority.
11. MCES Loan /Grant Application
Adopted the following Resolution:
96 -06 -63
AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR MCES LOAN /GRANT
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services has established
a program to offer loans to communities serviced by them to sponsor projects
to reduce inflow and infiltration from entering the metropolitan disposal
system.
WHEREAS, the MCES also has available grant monies for studies to provide
for development of an action plan to eliminate excessive inflow and
infiltration from entering the system.
3 6 -10 -96
WHEREAS, both programs require matching funds from the participating
communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Maplewood City Council hereby
directs staff to forward applications to the MCES for both programs.
12. Surplus Property Disposal
Authorized declaring as surplus property and disposal at State auction:
1990 Ford Model 6610 tractor /mower SN BC64208
1993 Trackless Model MT -511 with mower decks, snow blower and sander
13. Park Development Plans for Maplecrest Park
Authorized improvement of Maplecrest Park as recommended by the Park
Commission at a total budget request of $75,000 with the additional $25,000
being allocated from the Parkside neighborhood P.A.C. account.
14. Conti n 9 ency4
'Request: Additional Copies of Maplewood -in- Motion for Community Center
Authorized a transfer of $4,000 from the Contingency Fund into the Public
Relations publishing budget (101 -111- 000 - 4360), to provide additional copies
of the Spring, Summer and Winter issues of Maplewood -in- Motion for
distribution at the Community Center.
150 Request for Full -Time Custodian
Authorized combining two permanent part -time building maintenance positions
into one full -time position.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M.: (7:08 P.M.) Saint Paul Water Utility Conditional Use Permit and Design
Review (1900 Rice Street)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a
proposal to expand the water treatment plant by building a 6,000 square-
foot, two -story brick addition to the solids dewatering facility at 1900
Rice Street.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
e. Commissioner Barbara Ericson presented the Planning Commission report.
f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
Bradley Eilts, St. Paul Water Utility
L
4 6 -10 -96
9
Councilmember Rossbach. introduced the.following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
96 -06 -64
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ST. PAUL WATER UTILITY BUILDING EXPANSION
WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Water Utility has requested a Conditional Use Permit to
expand the solids dewatering facility at the water treatment plant.
WHEREAS, this Pp
ermit applies to 1900 Rice Street North. The legal description
p
is:
SECTION 18 TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22 IN THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD REVISED
DESCRIPTION NUMBER 175 A SPECIFIC PART OF SEC 18, TN 29 R 220
WHEREAS, the history of this Conditional Use Permit is as follows:
1. On June 3, 1996, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve this permit.
2.. On June 10 1996 the City Council held a publ.i c hearing. The City
staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing
a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning
Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described
Conditional Use Permit based on the building and site plans. The City approves this
permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated
to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of
Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the
surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
40 The use would not involve any activity, process, materials equipment or
methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental,
disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of
excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air
pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness,
electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets
and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing
or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services,
including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public
facilities or services,
5 6 -10 -96
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's
natural and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the City. The
Director of Community Development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year
of Council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The
Council may extend this deadline for one year.
3,.The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes- all
h . Counci l member Rossbach moved to approve the.. pl ans stamped May 17 , ._1996 _.
for the proposed. addition to ,St_Paul Water Utility's solids dewateri ng
faci 1 i ty. The Director of Community Development may approve minor
changes to the plans,
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
2. 7:15 P.M.: (7:18 P.M.) North Glen Fourth Addition Revised Preliminary Plat (Castle
Avenue)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a
proposal by Mario Cocchiarella, representing Maplewood Development,
Inc., to develop lots for four homes on a 2.22 acre site south of Castle
Avenue, east of White Bear.Avenue, to be known as North Glen Fourth
Addition.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Assistant City Engineer Matthys presented additional information.
e. Commissioner Ericson presented the Planning Commission report.
f. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Mario Cocchiarella, the applicant
Steven Swanson, 2296 Ariel Court
Tammy Korum, 2295 Ariel Court
Gary Korum, 2295 Ariel Court
LeAnn Kaup, 2289 Ariel Court
Pam Ki f fe , 2290 Ariel Court
6 6 -10 -96
g. Housing & Redevelopment Authority Commissioner Lorraine Fischer
responded to questions from the Council regarding Truth -in- Housing
regulations.
y h. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
g. Council member Rossbach moved, to _approve the North Glen Fourth Addition
Orel i mi nary at C recei
y ved by Ci tv on Apri,1 , 22 , 1996) .Before the
City Council approves the final plat, a developer shall complete the
following conditions
1. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the
developer or contractor will:
a. complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete
all public improvements and meet all City requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the
grading limits.
c. Pay the City for the cost of any traffic-control and
street-identification signs.
d. Provide all necessary easements.
2. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements
and overall site drainage. The City Engineer shall include in
the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or
contractor has not completed before final plat approval.
3.* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and
Engineering plans, These plans shall include: grading, utility,
drainage, erosion control, tree, and street plans. The plans
shall meet the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the
City Code.
b. The grading plan shall:
(1) Include proposed building pad elevation and
contour information for each home.
(2) Show sedimentation basins as required by the
watershed board.
(3) Show housing styles that reduce the grading on
sites where the developer can save large trees.
c. Provide a tree plan for the City Engineer's approval
before grading or final plat approval. This plan shall
show where the developer will remove, save or replace
large trees. This plan also must show the size, species
and location of any trees that the developer will plant
as replacement trees. All trees that the developer will
plant shall be at least 2 1/2 inches in diameter. There
shall be no tree removal beyond the approved grading and
tree limits.
d. The City Engineer shall not approve the utility plans
until after the North Saint Pau] Engineer approves the
plans.
4. Change the plat as follows:
a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the City Engineer.
b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the
final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and
rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines.
7 6 -10 -9F
5.* Provide all easements required by the City Engineer. These shall
include any drainage easements for the off - site drainage areas
that this pro ject would affect.
If the developer decides to final plat art of the preliminary plat,
P P P P YP
the City may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final
plat.
*Th developer must complete these conditions before the Ci issues a
grading permit or approves the final plat:
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
h. Counci I member Rossbach moved to apgr_ ove, front setbacks. of,50 feet for
Lots 1 -4, North Glen Fourth Addition.
i Sri i ■ i r��r
Seconded by Councilmember.Koppen Ayes all
H. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Maplewood Innovative Storm Management, Project 95 -12
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Assistant City Engineer Matthys presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
d. Councilmember Carlson introdu the following Resolution and moved its
adopt_
95 - 06 65
AWARD OF BID PROJECT 95 -12
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid
of Ashbach Construction Company in the amount of $203,004.80 is the lowest
responsible bid for the construction of Birmingham Innovative Storm Sewer,
City Project 95 -12, and the Mayor and. Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for . and on behalf of the
Ci ty
The Finance Director is hereby . authorized to make the financial
transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -all
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NONE
8 6 -10 -96
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Cash Connection Charge Objection, 2471 Forest Street
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Assistant City Engineer Matthys presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following were heard:
Kathy and David Korman, property owners
Lee Bisel, Lee Bisel Homes, builder
Bill Sievers, owner of lot at end of Forest
d Mayor Bastian moved to _table this item until June, 24, .1996 to allow time
for additional information regardi nq the _circum and research
Dossible options.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all
20 Proposal From Licensed Refuse Collectors Regarding Organized Collection
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Assistant City Manager Dawson presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following were heard:
Michael Hinz, Gopher Disposal
Kim Carlson, Woodlake Sanitary Service
Chris Reinhart,Evergreen Environmental Services
Kathy Juenemann, 721 Mt. Vernon Avenue
William Robbins, 2277 Stillwater Avenue
Kevin Berglund, 1978 Ripley
d. Mayor Bastian moved to hold a special .Council Meeting on August 5, 1996
at 5:00 P.M. for the purpose of further, discussion" of collection systems
and to extend to that date the close of the planning phase of the
statutory, process.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
9 6 -10 -9F
3..Cope Avenue Overlay, Project 96 -11: Approve Plans and Authorize Bids t.
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Assistant City Engineer Matth s resented the specifics of the report.
Y 9 Y P P P
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
d. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
96 06 - 66
APPROVING PLANS AND ADVERTISING FOR BIDS - PROJECT 96 -11
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on June 10,
1996,
plans and specifications for Cope Avenue Bituminous Overlay, Project
9641 have been prepared by (or under, the direction of) the City Engineer
who has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such P lans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto
and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on
file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official paper and in the Construction. Bulletin an advertisement for
bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans
and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at
least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify
the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened
and considered by the Council at 10 A.M., on the 11th day of July,
1996, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless
sealed and filed with the Acting Clerk and accompanied by a
certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid.
3. The Acting City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and
instructed to receive, open, and - read aloud bids received at the
time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The
Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the
regular City Council meeting of July 22, 1996.
Seconded by Councilmember.Rossbach Ayes all
4. Jurisdiction Transfer - Joy Road and Hazelwood Street
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Assistant City Engineer Matthys presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
10 6 -10 -9F
d. Counci 1 member Carlson introduced the fol 1 owi ng Resolution and moved its
ador)ti on
�
96 - 06 - 67
RECLASSIFICATION OF ROADWAYS - .JOY ROAD AND HAZELWOOD STREET
WHEREAS, the 1991 Mi nnesota Legisl established a Ramsey County
Local Government Services Study Commi ssion to "report on the advantages and
disadvantages of sharing, cooperating, restructuring, or consolidati
activities in areas of public service including public works; and
WHEREAS, the consolidation plan provides for reclassification of
roadways and corresponding changes in jurisdiction, including the transfer
of local and State Aid roadways between the County and municipalities; and
WHEREAS, Hazelwood Avenue (County Road 145) from Ripley Street to Frost
Avenue, and Joy Road (County Road 109) from the Maplewood /North St. Paul
border to Lydia Avenue, located in the City of Maplewood, are presently
under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County as County Roads; and
WHEREAS, these roadways have been determined to serve a local function
only; and
WHEREAS, revocation of "County Road" status may be accomplished by
resolution of the Ramsey County Board of Commi ssioners pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes §163.11; and
WHEREAS, The City of Maplewood has concurred that jurisdiction should be
changed from Ramsey County to the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, the consolidation plan stipulates that Ramsey County shall
improve the roadways to acceptable levels prior to transferring jurisdiction
over roadway segments from Ramsey County to municipalities, and the Ramsey
County Capital Improvement Program provides funding for these improvements;
and
WHEREAS, The City.of Maplewood desires Ramsey County to recycle and
overlay Hazelwood Avenue from Ripley Street to Frost Avenue for an estimated
cost of $20,000. from Capital Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway
Consolidation; and
WHEREAS, The Ramsey County Public Works Department performed a recycle
and overlay on Joy Road in 1991; and
WHEREAS, Joy Road has been improved to an acceptable level prior to the
transfer of roadway jurisdiction as calculated from the Pavement Management
System [(90- Condition Rating) Condition Rating] X 1993 Condition Rating),
therefore exempting Ramsey County from providing any compensation from the
County Roadway Consolidation Fund to the City of Maplewood for the
jurisdictional transfer of Joy Road;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Maplewood does hereby
concur with Ramsey County revoking the "County Road" status of Hazelwood
Avenue between Ripley Street and Frost Avenue, and Joy Road from the
Maplewood /North St. Paul border to Lydia Avenue and transferring
jurisdiction over the roadways to the City of Maplewood, effective the first
day of the second month following the completion of the recycle and overlay
11 6 -10 -96
of Hazelwood Avenue and after the Ramsey County Office of Budgeting and
Accountin g has encumbered the funds necessary to fund the recycle and
overly p roject, and after the County is in receipt of an adopted resol
Y p �
from the City of Maplewood concurring with the County revoking the "County
Road" status of Hazelwood Avenue from Ripley Street to Frost Avenue, and Joy
Road from p
the Ma lewood /North St. Paul border to Lydia Avenue; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County will recycle and overlay
Hazelwood Avenue from Ripley Street to Frost. Avenue; for an esti mated cost
of $20,000 from Capital Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway and
' P
Cap Improvements Funds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation as, jus
compensation fo this jurisdicti transfer; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Maplewood Engineer i authorized within
the limits of this resolution to take actions necessary to have the
identified juri sdiction changes executed.
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes all
5. Mall Area Traffic Improvements, Project 89 =21 Design Fee Increase Request
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b Assistant Cit y g Y E Matth s p resented the specifics of the report.
.
c. May or Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
d. Councilmember Carlson moved to:
i l approve an increase in the consultant's fee for deSiqn work of $20,000:
2 Z au thori ze executi of Agreements 95030 and 95003;
3 aut revision of the budg for. Pro 89 -12 to $646,444.40;
4 a rove the fi nancing.p lan for the p roject to be
Ramsey County $2152000
Maplewood Municipal State Aid $4312444.40
Seconded b Councilmember Ko pen. Ayes - all
Y P
6. Metropol i tan Livable Communities Act - Housing Action Plan
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
Director of Community Devel ent Coleman
b . Y Pm resented the specifics of the P
report.
c. Commissioner Ericson presented the Planning Commission report.
d. C p
C ommissioner Fischer resented the Housing & Redevelopment Commission
report
e. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
f. Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the 1996 Maplewood Housin4 Action
Plan as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
12 6 -10 -9F
7 . Tax - Forfeited Properties
a. Manager McGuire presented the.staff report.
.r
b. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the
report,
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding.this matter. No.one appeared.
d.. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
96 - 06 - 68
AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR CONVEYANCE OF A TAX - FORFEITED PARCEL
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has decided that the City needs
the following-described tax - forfeited land for drainage and ponding
purposes
N 150 FT OF S 1198 92/100 FT OF E 137 FT MOL OF W
417 FT MEASURED DUE E AND W OF PART OF SW 1/4 OF NW
1/4 E OF KE LLER PKWY IN SEC 9 TN 29 RN 22 (PIN #
09-29-22-23-0011-9).
WHEREAS, the wetland on the property makes development of the
site difficult.
WHEREAS, the lot is land - locked, further limiting development
potential.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council authorizes
the Director of Community Development to apply for a use deed for
said tax - forfeited land for drainage and ponding.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
e. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following. Resolution and moved its
adoption:
96 - 06 - 69
AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR CONVEYANCE OF A TAX - FORFEITED PARCEL
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has decided that the City needs
the following- described tax - forfeited land for drainage and ponding
purposes:
LOT 4 OF AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 77 ST. PAUL, MINN. EX W
256 FT; SUBJ TO ROAD & ESMTS (PIN # 25- 29- 22 033- 0072 -3).
WHEREAS, Maplewood needs more open space in this part of this
City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council authorizes
the Director of Community Development to apply for a use deed for
said tax - forfeited land for drainage, ponding and open space.
13 6 -10 -9F
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
e. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
96 06 - 10
AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR CONVEYANCE OF A TAX - FORFEITED PARCEL
WHEREAS the City of Maplewood has decided that the City needs
the following-described tax - forfeited land for drainage _and. pondi ng
purposes:
LOTS 1 THRU 3, BLOCK 1 OF MINTY ACRES, SUBJ TO ESMTS
(PIN # 36- 29- 22 -12- 0002 -5; PIN # 36- 29 -22- 12- 0003 -8;
PIN # 36-29-22-12-0004-1)0
WHEREAS, the wetland on these p roperties makes development of
the site difficult
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council authorizes
the Director of Community Development to apply for a use deed for
said tax - forfeited land for drainage, ponding and space.
Seconded b y Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
80 Authorize Advertising for Bids: Edgerton Park School Playground Equipment
a. Manager McGuire presented the,staff report
b. Director of Parks & Recreation presented the specifics of the report.
• c. Mayor Bastian asked if :anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared
d. Councilmember Carlson moved to authorize allocation of 1997 P.A.C. money
for im in 1996 and for City staff to continue to work with the
school district to determine fundi and phasing for the proposed
Edgerton School Master Plan project.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
9. Schedule Re- assessment Hearing for Proj. 93 -08, Sterling /Schaller Improvements
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Assistant City Engineer Matthys presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
d. Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
14 6 -10 -9E
96 06 - 71
ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING - PROJECT 93 -08
WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer, have, at the direction of the
9
Council, prepared an assessment roll. for the. construction of
Sterling /Schaller Improvements City Project 93 -08, and the said assessment
is -on file i n the office of the City Clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF*MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the . 8th day of July, 1996, at the
City Hall at 7:00 p. m. to pass upon such proposed assessment
and at such.time and place all persons owning property affected
by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard
with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed. assessment to be published in the
official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and
to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said
assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shat l state the date, time and place of
hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area to be
assessed that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the
Clerk and that written or oral objections will be considered.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes all
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
NONE
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. High School Name
a. Counci 1 member Carlson commented on the letter Council received regarding
the process for choosing a school name, and suggested that a letter be
written outlining the City's concerns.
b. Council will submit their concerns to City Manager McGuire and he will
prepare a letter for delivery to the meeting on June 19, 7:00 P.M. at
the District offices.
15 6 -10 -96
In
2. Tobacco Compliance
a. Councilmember Carlson stated he had received a call from North Suburban
Tobacco Compliance and asked if the City should become a member.
b. Director of Public Safety Collins reported that Maplewood is already a
member and that he and Captain Ryan have been attending the meetings.
C. Staff will prepare a report on what is being done in Maplewopd.
3. Mayor's Forum
a. Mayor Bastian commented on several items:
1) variations in speed limit on different parts of County Road C;
2) when will Ramsey County be doing the rest.of County Road C;
3) status of access to trail from County, Road C;
4) questions. from residents about limiting the ..number of outdoor
entertainment opportunities in a neighborhood;
5) Metropolitan Council report that Maplewood has an estimated 1995
population of 33,533 with 12,827 households, up from the 1990
figures of 30954 12,120;
6) complaints received about the music playing late at the
Midsummer Night Celebration at the Community Center on June 9;
7) White Bear Avenue Summerfest will be July 10
8) next Mayor's Forum will be a neighborhood open house at the
Metro Funeral Home from 6 :00 - 7:00 P..M., then to his house on
Ide Court at 7:00 P.M.
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Closed Session Fire Contract Negotiations
a. Mayor Bastian moved to go.. into ,clo
negotiations with th fire departments
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach
COUNCIL ADJOURNED AT 10 :25 FOR CLOSED SESSION
CLOSED SESSION CONVENED AT 10:29 P.M.
ion.
Ayes - all
i scussi on of
16 6 -10 -96
PRESENT:
Gary W. Bastian, Mayor
Sherry Allenspach Councilmember
Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember
George F. Rossbach, Councilmember
Michael McGuire City Manager
Patrick Kelly, City Attorney
Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager
Kenneth. Collins, Director of Public Safety.
Joel Hewitt Fire Chief
MAYOR BASTIAN MOVED TO ADJOURN THE CLOSED SESSION AT 10:52 P.M.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ROSSBACH AYES - ALL
COUNCIL MEETING RE- CONVENED AT 10 :55 P.M.
a. City Manager McGuire presented the report on the outcome of
negotiations addressing specific points.
b. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the contract with East County
Line Fire Department,
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
N, ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
Mayor Bastian moved, seconded by Councilmember Allenspach, ayes - all, to adjourn the
meeting at 11:00 P.M.
Lois N. Behm, Acting City Clerk
17 6 -10 -96
EA, 1.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT HRA Vacancy
DATE: May 15
INTRODUCTION
There is a vacancy on the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). City staff advertised this
vacancy in the Maplewood Review and Maplewood in Motion. We received applications from four
Maplewood residents.
BACKGROUND
On May 14, 1996, the HRA interviewed the four applicants for the vacancy at their regular
meeting. The HRA voted on the four applicants and recommended that the council interview the
top two vote - getters.
DISCUSSION
I have attached the applications of two people that the HRA recommended for this position.
RECOMMENDATION
:Interview the applicants for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and,pick one to fill
the vacant term. This person shall serve on the HRA until March 1998.
kr/hravacny.mem
Attachments:
1. Matthew Ledvina application
2. Joe O'Brien application
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM
NAME
Attachment 1
ADDRESS L' 2 L'�(�G �r � � ZIP
PHONE NO. Work' �'D � r l 2 � Home J�� �� 6�� DATE
1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? IM�►�v�' �Y1+5
2) Doe s our employment uire travel or being away from the community which would make regular
y require
�� at meetings difficult? Yes No
a g
3) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (please check)
Community Design Review Board
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Human Relations Commission
Park &Recreation Commission
X Planning Commission
Police Civil Service Commission
y
4} Do you have an sl2e cific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsibilities?
5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant:
6) Why would you like to serve on this Board or Commission?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
2
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC 2/95
Ms. Melinda Coleman
Planning Director _
City f Maplewood
ty
M
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Dear Ms. Coleman:
This letter is sent to express my interest in positions that may be available for the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority and /or the Planning Commission. My preference is for a position on
the Planning Commission. Responses to items 4) through 5) of the Applicant Information Form
are included in this cover letter. I have enclosed the Applicant Information Form and my
professional resume for your review.
I am interested in all aspects of the scope . of the Commission/Authority. I would like to see that
development and redevelopment of sites within the city occur with a high degree of
environmental sensitivity. This includes preservation of landforms, pollution prevention and
ecosystem management.
My wife and I moved to Maplewood in March of this year and I have not had a chance to
become active in community organizations up to this point. I served a Planning Commissioner
for the City of Chanhassen for three years until the time we moved to Maplewood. I also served
as Planning Commission liaison to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority as well as a
member of the Bluff Creek Corridor Preservation Task Force. Please contact Chanhassen
Mayor Don Chmiel (474 -6446) or Planning Director Kate Aanenson (937 -1900, ext. 118) if you
would like to contact references regarding my involvement with the City of Chanhassen.
I believe I can make a significant contribution to the community by providing careful review of,
and creative input for, the various projects that are undertaken within the City of Maplewood.
My educational and professional experiences have enabled me to develop a broad perspective
on many complicated issues which must be decided by the City Council with support from the
various advisory groups.
Thank you for your consideration regarding the available positions. I look forward to becoming
a contributing citizen of the City of Maplewood.
cerel
Matthew L. viva
cc: Honorable Gary Bastian
Mayor, City of Maplewood
K?
MATTHEW L. LEDVINA, P.E.
3.12 mar. Rd
9 a—LV e
Naas' I-r-a
(612) -l658
OBJECTIVE
Obtain full time employment in the environmental engineering field. The ideal position requires
the use of strong project management skills and extensive technical skills.
EMPLOYMENT
B. A. Liesch Associates, Minneapolis, MINI
Environmental and Engineering Consulting firm.
1987 - Present
J. M. Montgomery and Associates (formerly E.A. Hickok and Associates), Wayzata, MN.
Environmental and Engineering Consulting firm.
1984- 1987
EDUCATION
University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN
Master of Business Administration
May 1992
University of Wisconsin -Green Bay, Green Bay, WI
Graduate Course Work in Environmental Science
1982- 1984
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
B.S., Civil and Environmental Engineering
May 1982
EXPERIENCE
Corgi, orate Safety Served as a Corporate Radiation Safety Officer. Served as a member of the
corporate Health and Safety Committee. Conducted in -house radiation safety training refresher
seminars. Drafted corporate operating procedures and policies for construction site safety.
Prepared numerous site specific safety plans for investigation and work on contaminated sites.
Industrial Solid Waste Management Prepared numerous Management Plans for industrial Solid
Wastes received at landfills and incinerators. Characterization, evaluation and treatment/
disposal /processing recommendations for paint wastes, ashes, resins, PCB wastes, food
processing wastes, empty containers, asbestos, paper mill sewage sludge and low level
radioactive wastes.
Engineering Design Preparation of complete engineering plans for landfill liners with leachate
collection from the development of conceptual design and MPCA permitting through
construction. Economic analysis for alternative landfill liner materials and soil borrow studies
for landfill sites. Prepared and implemented closure plans and reports including design of landfill
gas venting systems, terrace systems for erosion control and drainage control structures.
Conducted investigations of alternative final cover materials such as water treatment lime
sludge, paper mill sewage sludge and synthetic membranes.
4
Resume
Matthew Ledvina
Page 2
EXPERIENCE (continued)
Assisted in the development of engineering plans for ground water removal and treatment
systems, soil vapor extraction, in situ groundwater sparging systems and waste water
treatment lagoons.
Rules and Administrative Orders Proficient in the interpretation an.d applicability of State and
Federal Rules including: RCRA Subtitle D, RCRA Subtitle C, RCRA Subtitle 1, CERCLA, Clean
Air Act Section 111 B, NPDES, OSHA 29CFR 1910.120, NRC Title 10, MERLA, MN Solid Waste
Facility Rules, MN EQB Rules and WDNR Solid Waste Facility Rules.
Assisted in regulatory negotiations of Request for Response Actions, Consent Orders,
Stipulation Agreements and Closure Orders. Served as Project Engineer for conducting remedial
investigations, feasibility studies and remedial action plans. Prepared solid waste facility cost
estimates and developed mechanisms for complying with regulatory requirements of financial
assurance for closure, long term care and contingency actions.
Site Remediation Conducted studies to define landfill leachate quality and quantities for on -site
treatment by aeration lagoons and off -site treatment by publicly owned treatment works.
Performed economic analyses of waste water treatment alternatives to identify the most cost
effective technique(s). Prepared remedial action plans for landfill and industrial sites to mitigate
ground waters contaminated with dissolved metals and volatile organics. Supervised the
successful excavation and manifesting of 1,000 tons of hazardous wastes and contaminated
soil at an industrial site.
Construction Administration Prepared design specifications and contract documents for
administration of landfill liner /leachate collection system construction, landfill closure
construction, and water supply well rehabilitation. Conducted all contract administration tasks
for construction projects with budgets up to $850,000. involved in surveying and grade
staking of liners, closure covers and borrow areas. Quality control work for clay liner placement
and "as built" report preparation for construction certification.
HydroQeoloQic Investigation Developed and supervised the undertaking of numerous
hydrogeologic investigations at solid waste landfills and industrial sites in various types of
glacial and bedrock formations. Implementation of environmental monitoring systems in the
evaluation of the magnitude and extent of groundwater contamination. Conducted hydraulic
testing of monitoring wells and pumping wells to define aquifer characteristics.
REGISTRATION:
Professional Engineer, States of Minnesota, Wisconsin and New Jersey.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Planning Commissioner, City of Chanhassen
Industrial Council on Environmental Management
M PCA Solid Waste Facility Financial Assurance Task Force
American Society of Civil Engineers
National Society of Professional Engineers
References Available on Request.
5
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM
Joe O' Brien
Attachment 2
NAME
1706 Lark Avenue East, Maplewood, MN 55109
ADDRESS ZIP
PHONE NO. Work: 225 -9452 Home: 0/04/95
773 -3817 DATE
1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? 25 years
2) Does your employment require travel or being away from the community which would make regular
attendance at meetings difficult? Yes No .._ -
3) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (please check)
x Community Design Review Board
xx Housing & Redevelopment Authority
X Human Relations Commission
Park & Recreation Commission
x Planning Commission
Police Civil Service Commission
* (most interested in the HRA, but would consider other options)
4) Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsibilities?
I have an interest in the shaping of the community, both commercially
and privately (housing). I would like to have the opportunity to
be .involved in the decision making process. My interests are in
both policy issues and development issues. Specific issues I have
followed in Maplewood include.Open Space, The Compost Site off Beam
Avenue, Senior Housing, Housing Development, Commercial Development
(especially around St. John's Hospital and the Maplewood Mall) and more.
5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant:
I have grown up in Maplewood and'was active in playing MAA baseball
and soccer. I was on the Hazelwood teams. I am proud to say I
attended Hazelwood School when it was still open.
6) Why would you like to serve on this Board or Commission?
I would like to serve on this Board or Commission because I am very
interested in the activities, issues and the developing and shaping
of the community in which I live -in and have watched become more
and more developed.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
I posses a four year college degree from the University of Minnesota.
My degree is in Housing with an emphasis in Community Development
and Public Policy. I would like to use my knowledge gained at the
University of:'Minnesota, and the knowledge I have gained at my current
job at a neighborhood organization in St. Paul, and.apply it in my
home community.
-6-
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC. 2195
Joe O'Brien
1706 Lark Avenue
Maplewood, MN 55109
October 6, 1995
Mr. Ken Roberts
Department of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Roberts:
I am interested in serving on a City of Maplewood Boards and Commissions. Please find
enclosed the completed application you mailed to me, per our telephone conversation. I
have a particular interest in the HRA Board, but also am interested in Community Design
Review and Planning Commission.
Mr. Roberts, I am interested in the development of Maplewood. I have lived in this city
for 25 years. Because I grew up on Hazelwood Avenue, I have seen a great deal of
development which has occurred in Maplewood. I can remember the fields where
Maplewood Mall is now located, the building of the Fire Station located on Hazelwood
Avenue and County Road C, the expansion of Beam Avenue, both to the west of
Hazelwood and to the east of White Bear Avenue, the sand pit which was turned into St.
John's Hospital, the re- excavation of the Hazelwood Soccer Fields, the expansion of
Harvest Park, and more, as well as countless numbers of housing development which has
taken place, including the elderly housing units.
I have experienced Maplewood's development and now wish to be a part of it. With a
Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Minnesota in Housing Community
Development and Public Policy and the experience I have working for anon- profit
I ommunity development corporation in St. Paul (Selby Area Community Development
Corporation), I believe I have some valuable experiences to donate to our City.
Please consider me a candidate for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Board, the
Community Design Review Board, or the Planning Commission. I can be reached at work
(225 -9452) or at home (773 - 3817). I look forward to meeting with you to discuss further
my options.
Sincerely,
d t
?e 001 -�
Joe O'Brien
7
Joe O'Brien
1706 Lark Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55109
(612) 773 -3817
Bachelor of Science Degree in Housing
University of Minnesota, St. Paul
Emphasis in Community Development and Public Policy
G. P. A.: 3.09
Special Skills
Team Player
Organized and Flexible
Developed Written and Oral Communication
Experience with Word Perfect, Microsoft Excel and Word for Windows
Relevant Courses
Urban Studies
Housing Policies
Diverse Populations
Building and Residential Technology
On Job Training with Architect Jim Glendening
Building Code Requirements Seminar (Continuing Ed., Univ. of St. Thomas)
Work Experiences
Development Specialist: Selby Area Community Development Corp.
St. Paul, Minnesota May '94 - Present
Supervise the rehabilitation of single family homes.
Work with members of City of St. Paul Staff and private funders at
coordinating rehabilitation of homes in Summit University Area.
Gather information, inspect and research potential projects.
Estimate the cost to rehabilitate selected future projects.
Calculate project budgets and track project expenses
Aide in drafting scope of work for rehabilitation of homes.
Complete grant applications and related documents
Tabulate construction bids for future projects.
Perform Construction Management on home rehabilitation.
Create record keeping documents on computer.
Construct Housing Manual for Development Specialist position.
8
Internship at two Housing and Redevelopment Authorities
Forest Lake/ Lindstrom, Minnesota December '93 -March '94
Perform Executive Director duties at senior apartment buildings.
Perform annual tenant reviews
Annual Inspection of apartment units
Supervise building maintenance staff.
Market vacant Units.
Self Employed Snow Plowing Winter '90 - '94.
Maplewood, Minnesota
Remove snow from parking lots, driveways and sidewalks.
Perform administrative duties, including record keeping.
Route Driver - Kohler Mix Specialties June '89 - Present
White Bear Lake, Minnesota
Deliver company product to local restaurant.
Prepare fleet of trucks for deliveries.
04
References Available Upon Request.
0
Maplewood HRA
Minutes of 05 -14 -96
C. HRA Interviews
The commissioners interviewed the four. applicants for the available .position on the
commission. The termThey are Peter Brueggeman, Matthew Ledvina, Joe O'6rien and
Shelly Strauss. The commission then voted. The two candidates with the most votes
were then recommended to the city council.
Commissioner Connelly moved the Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority
recommend Matthew Levina and Joe O'Brien as a possible candidate for the vacancy on
the Maplewood HRA.
Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes —all
AGENDA NO. I F -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: June 17, 1996
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed _the bills and
authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
$233,743.79 Checks #6408 thru #6433 dated 5 -30 -96 thru 6 -5 -96
$124,262.06 Checks #25997 thru #26090 dated 6 -11 -96
$106,720.18 Checks #6434 thru #6446 dated 6 -6 -96 thru 6 -12 -96
$1-32,61-9-0 Checks #26097 thru #26247 dated 6 -18 -96
$597,345.12 Total Accounts Payable
PAYR DT ,--
$272,998.49 Payroll Checks dated 6 -14 -96
$47,889.08 Payroll Deduction checks #52841 thru #52854 dated 6- 14 -96.
$320 Total Payroll
$918,232.69 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims.
rb
Attachments
Q%WPWIN601HGENDAIAPPRCL17.JUN
uCUrf E�. ^ ^:.
CITY
OF MAFL_EWOOD
PAGE 1
06/07/96
07:52
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
.,
FOR
F'ERTOD 05
,
VOUCHE -R/
- GFIEiK _
CFZECI{
- 41Fh1DOT;
VENDOR
_ ..... - -ITEFI -- - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- -
- - - - -- - - TTF1� — _ - -
- - -- - -- Elf;_— -
�Ii
--
NUMB ER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
OU
AMOUNT
f 45400 -.
0 J':�079b. _
M 4 3
r1IMN. STATE - TREASURER- -' - _ .
'STATE'-D`RTVE` S' - -LlC �FFES F7�Y�L.:�-T---
.���.:� -- -
-_. _ - - -- ��-� - - - --
4
-� {
6409
05/30/96
541400
MINN STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
1
16
,
641 -0
05/31/96
722200
Ft. E.R.A.
P/R DED MAY FOR JUNE PREMIUM
321.00
321.00
- -- 190400 —•-
- "'D'EF'T « OF NATURAL RESOUR E-S .
- .Dh1f� L- TrE`NSE 'T'EES - PA Yi-ST-.i[Mf - - --
6412
05/31/96
541400
MINN. STATE: TREASUR
STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABL
27 6w00
276.00
,.
6413
05/31/96
541400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
14.425.67
14,425.67
;
._..__.._ -- rl "'►.1.; -. -.
��/ .?J./ 7C]
_— ._. —_ I L....L:.OV ..
....- �'wCi.rl' \wAr ......._._ __.— .— __--__
. —.-17 ll.I7(? � 1'IAI•'tiYIN RU ' FEN_
�••�w
I"q+
5/17/96 F' /R MARV IN KOF'F'EN
15.49
30 w 9S
- 5/ 17/96 P71Z' I [- DLICTIDhi
i.V
5/17/96 F' /R DEDUCTION
17, 0 37 w 43
30, 536 r X35
•
iss'
.
TOTAL CHECKS
63 ,65 2 .50
,an'
I .
Id•f
I
%d F.
I
f `F
.F.1
lF."
IFN
IF`
'-f'
I.•
-1
t
1-"
I;f
VOLECFiF:Er ^ ^..
CITY OF MAPL_E:.WOOD
PAGE_ 1
06/07/96
07:52
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
I ''
FOR PERTOD 06 - - - -
- -- -
- - -- -
` f
VOUCH ~1 /
VENDOR
_ .. VENDOR --
- - - - - - - -- - - - 7TET'T - - - -- - - --
`�TEFI' -
- --
NUMBER
DATE
Nt.)MI ;1 *
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
6
NORWFST - BANK MIr4Nr7SO`TA---- ._..
-_._ . X1317*�6 - F'>FS- I5F'DllCTT.OT�7 - -- - --
3a «75 .
--- - - a�,;
5/31/96 P/R DEDUCTION
29,635.78
5/31 /96 P/R DEDU
13.956.61.
57, 5 4 9.0 0
6418
06/03/96
320500
GROUP HEALTH INC.
TUNE 96 P/R DED PREMIUM DUE
3,742.20
pf'�
TUNE 96 P/R DIED PREMIUM DUE
15„ 120.70
- -- - - - - --
- - - -- - - �T1,JFiE - 9b - 1= 'T ri'" � GD Fi•iF�T�lI1.J1;'T_
�,a :ti
�7�� i.
641
06/03/96
530100
MED I CA CHOICE
'TUNE 96 PREMIUM DUE
3.298.50
_ ---- TU'HE FRE hTTUFt -- RJE
--- M7. o4
JUNE 96 PREMIUM DUE
18
.JUNE:: 96 PRE-MIUM DU
1 , X07.05
23,146.00
�6420
06/0 3 /96
5511.00
MN MUTUAL LIFE I NSURANCE
.JUNE 96 PREMIUM DUE
341.64
JUNE:: 96 PREMIUM DUE
796.56
31
I.TiJF1C��FTL- FiI[7i~T
., �_.a ..
JUNE 96 PREMIUM DUE
51.06
2
z" c
1130 ID\/ _
-... -D w C wA 0.1.1`{l.. « - --. -- _- .__._.-
_- _--- • LTVI'11� 1"IDI "1 _. �.1 AlVE
ts w
6 422
06
501400
MADIS N ATIONAL L IFE
JUNE: 96 PREMI D UE
2,384.62
2,384.62
3i' 1
6423
06/0:/96
943500
WISCONSIN DEFT. OF REVENUE
WIS SWT MAY 96
849.62
849.62
"
4;
.4"1400
- 1*iTf+ N SIAM IPT URER
E7FF' S, - L-1C--FEES PAYABLE
691 . 50
> T �
,_.
6426
06
351200
HONG KONG CAFE
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
50.11
50.11
6 427
06/03/96
5141400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LTC FEES PAYABLE
22
22 v 39 1.0 1 .
„n
_ - r)4^i3` - 06704
53 '1W ---
1Ri.�DT.CA-LHOICF_
AM14 - 7602 , 807
442.
,. •.
r,a
6429
- - --
06/04/96
- -
541400
-- - --
MINN. STATE TREASURER
-- - - - -- -- - - -- - - - - -- - -- -
STATE DR L_I FEE PAYABLE
- -- -- - _ - - - -- -- -- -- -- -
802.00
802
t
15F.
6430
06/04/96
541400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
19
19, 540.751
F
STATE:. 'TREAS'LP.,E.R.
PAYAPLE
It 9 18 5w 7 5
19, - 58= ; 75
Fr
E ,
64 3 2
-- - - - --
06/05/96
-___ . - - - - -- --
541400
- - - - - - -- - -
MINN. STATE TREASURER i:..R
- - -
STATE DRIVERS I. IC FEES PAYABLE
583.50
583« 5
6
fl.
. 64 33
06/05/96
712108
PIZZA HUT OF AMERICA INC.
PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES
45.00
45.00
rT'FtJND = - -COrr - - FAM "MEi 1-.r - - - - -- - -- --
-- .
FF
1 15 99f { }(;3 11. /96 THAI) , MYDOLJA F:: EFUND I }UF' F'MT AMkt 9 5 1.6687 ? . 02 7.02
O�'
- -- - - -
7
25999 06/1.1/96 MERGE:NS LAURIE E Rr"FIJND - CAMP MUSICAL THEATER 90.00 90.00 7 '
2.4-000, 06/1:1.1'9 ( - - -- - - - -- -- - -- - - - -- -- - - - -- - - - - -- -•� - -
.... � ..1.1t�lCMANN , KEN REFUND -- Ca IFI_.a SOF"TDt- `,I...t..
. ... .... .... :
r-,
I t .
I,f
1
VOUCF•IFtiE2
06 / 96 07:
CITY OF MAPLE::WOOD
_..
- -_-
-- - - - - -
-- VOUCHER/CHECK
REGISTER
PAG
- PERIOD- p - - - - -- — - - -- - -- -- _ _—
!
tlt: UCF• E
CHECK - -
NUMBER
-- - CHECK -- ___—
VENDOR
- VENDOR
le
DATE
NUI'1BER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
CWE`Cl� --
;y !
!
lE`- f- lt3LY-SfiIF2IT--------
-== -
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
1
4EFUIgD 0VERpA - III T•QFF Cyl~:QL7>"`
12 ;
2
06/11/96
010465
A T & T
V,J
- - -- - - -
PAGERS
— - - -- PAGERS -- -- - -
8.17
,, r -
-
-- - - - - -- — - - - - - - --
DIGITAL I:TAL PAGER -- MIS
--
21 . .ba
10.37
u;
-
T•AGER EVICECAAT,GC
�:. - z-
--
r:
---
�.'.laU04
06/11/96
010575
ACE HARDWARE
.
- zip -�-r—
- - - - -- ----- .. -
- -- _ -- ------ - - - - -- --
- _ _ -
--
F'FiOCyRAI'I SUP'P'LIES
o,
SUPPLIES
4 2.73
f
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
1
- - - -- -- --
_ -__
-_ __
MAINTEN MATERIAL
176.65
s'
26005
06/11/96
020825
--- - - - - -- - - -- - - -
ALL RITE ELECTRIC COMI: :ANY
-- - - - --
REPAIRS & MTMCE. /EQUIPMENT
337 .25
559 . 52
REPAIR & MA:I:NT /BUILDINGS
(37.00
---'--' REPAIR' - &' - MAINT /BUILD
14.24
.
.,
SALES TAX F'Fal_.. OUT OF STATE
z�
- - - - -- - - - --
REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT.
14.24- -
232 .00
"I
TsEI`ATF Pe MAIf4T /F.iUIl - DStIG a
-
R'EP'AID +i3•. MAINT /BUI
451.61.
-
- - --
--
SAL..1 TAX Plat... OUT OF STATE
2 .5>b -_
Er -�r�r. & MAINT /BUIL - - --
.96 ---
js—
REPAIR & MAINY /BUILDINGS
- -- - - - --
- - --
—
SALES T AX P BL. OUT OF STA
,
'6006
0
021000
AMERI- -DATA SYSTEM
—
SUPPLIE -- EQUIPMENT
387.66
Y
AMER ?CAN 1... SLlPPLY -
- .MAT
387.66
SEtalICE------ - - - - -- -- - -- -- -
MAT SERVICE
_ -- ia X85
-- - ----------- - - - - -- - --
-.
'D CriASr _. -_____ -
7�iE-
'
--
-- PROGRAM r -- _
PROGRAM FEES
- - --
a j.
' —� bpp`�•----
pb7'17./9b___
04a91 �i --
- -
Ai�NALSAUTO " 5i�'rVICC`
-
112:50
247.50
:,I
REPAIR & MAINT /tlEI•ilCl -C -- - - - - -- ------- - -
--._ -,-i - - - --
- -- - --
;;;
REPAI & MAINT /VEHICLE
22 4 o
85.06
- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- -
;
�'lr(?] 0 -
�b�'2�Y b - - -- --
0 �, 0600 -� -- -
-- AUTO - CL=ASS - - PECIAI. IS )TS ,, -- INC .;-
-- - - - -- REPA TR - R __ MA INT/VEHT Cl_fi -- _- ____ —__
—
50S' 1b
4b
26011
06/11/96
050790
AUTOMOTIVE: S E RVICE'S
.._ - -
. ------- - - - -._ _. -. -_- .
FE::F:'AIF; & MAIN ( /VE:F•IICL..E:
�.
26012
06/11/96
06 1
BATTERIES PLUS
_.
S VL::H xcl._r. - -..
.x41.3`
- -- -
301
::
--
SUP'P'LIES -•• E QUIPI"IEN T
b0 by
26013
06/11/96
061906
-- -
DF =.F BUILT
-.. - - - - -- - -- - - _ -- - -- -
.
472
- - -- - _ _ __-- - -
1 05 »4
- - --
St-N 1='LIES
b4.87
- _ --_
-
-
SUPPLIES -- VEH I CLE:
3 4. 5 5
;: UI :`PI._IES - VE:HICLL.
{�1
2601.4
0b /11 /9b
071400
DxF °F"
»C39
-191
_.. _.
,:
:SAT SVC
102 89
Car -tr S�. C
N
5 5 2 6
N
• i
VOUCt-•iRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 35
06/07/96
07:52
VOUCHER
/CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIO OFD
- -- -
4 .
VENDOR
VENDOR -
- - -- -- ITEi�t'- -.._.. _._._ ._ -. _ _. -._
__ BEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMO•tF•°R
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT 1 i..
- SAT
�IS I d)
--- - - - - -- '
SAT SVC
73 « 6c"3
SAT SVC,
90.25
530.23
26015
06/11/96
073200
BLUE BELL ICE CREAM CO.
MDSE. FOR RESALE
91.10
91.18
�"c�'?}'L - i3
iJ 11796 _
- Z3E313 �iO
'BOHL , -ZT0HN - -
26017
06/11/96
110325
CAPITOL COMMUNICATION
REPAIR & MAINT /RADIO
575.10
q 59. 42--
26018
06/11/96
118390
CA RUDDER STAM COMPANY
SU -- OFFICE
60.70
60 « 7 0
, al
2601
06/11/96
110470
CARL -E, TEEANE.TTE
VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
24.64.
24.64
4( �
_ yy y y
.+►y }�}�
�►� -��7 - ��� �r -
PRO U 1 �•� - CO - m - ..-_. ._
-yp �y} -gyp
-- 1 IA�T��1`I I.�G 1"1 AI ER 5
511
32.1 1
?l
•
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
58.85
117.70
13
?5I
--- CFRTTr- TF LATIORATORTr -_,S) -- -- _ _ ------
'SUPPLTES -- JANT I UH , IAL
4Z.5.
;A
SU PP LIES -- JANITORIAL
423.84
847.72.
1
- BROO'KLYiI
TKAI1qTNB
.
41;
26023
06/11/96
131735
CLARKL..IFT OF MINNESOTA, INC.
SUP'P'LIES -- EQUIPMENT
188.90
1 88.90
�d1
�:.60.�4
"'
06/ 11 / 96
15017,E
'"
COLLINS INS ELECT . Gl7N.aT• w C O. CO .
S
E P AIR & MAINT /UTILITY
�.
^77.48
i af � �
REPAIR & MAINT /UTILITY
124.81
-
--
- - - - -- -- - _ --
- -- -- - -- - - --
- - -- - -- SALE - S TAX - PEEL. - uU - 1 -- DF - -
7.37-
ly�
5j I
26025
06/11/96
180808
DALCO
SUP'P'LIES -- EQUIPMEN
30 . 0 3
30.03
26026
06/11/96
190044
DEBIL7 STUDY
VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
8.32
8.32
`a
T60,27 D &n.1796 -- -
50 _
DIAMOND - VOCFL -- r- A-INTS -
, 8 2,2 « '
$ 'I
26028
06/11/96
240375
EMERGENCY AP' MAINT .
REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE
106.80
rn
-
- REP'ATR - llAINT /VEF•1TCLE
26029
06/11/96
250800
F. M. FRATTAI._ONE
PROD 95• -1.7 CONSTRUCTION
74, 573.05
P ROJ _ Sri - 17 COHSTF3JC:T I Ot+ -- - - - - --
26030
06/ 11 /96
2602 83
FA I RTRON CORPORATION
REPAIRS & MTNCE . /EQU IP'MENT
50.00
671
f�.
REPAIRS P- MTNCE . /EQUTP'MENT -- -
-- - - - - - -- -- - -- .-� �O ---
- - - - -_ -x0.00
_. I
�
i
260 1.
06/1.1./96
260450
F- EE D --•R T Tl ".: CONTROLS INC.
CHEM I CAI._S
_. -- _.. _. - --
483.38
- -- - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -
483. 38
- - -- - --- - --
_
21
,,:.6032
06/
270200
FLEXIBLE P IPE TOOL CO.
SUP P LIES - EQUIPMENT
617.24
617.
' £
2 l: 0,2 3
06/11./96
270300
FLORv TIM
TRAVEL & - TRAINING
L -�l
vO UCI ii L2
C I T Y
OF M APL_EWOOD
PAGE 4
06/07/96
07:52
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
- --
CFfEK - --
- - VENDOR -
-- -- - VENAOFt
ITEM ----------- - - - - --
-- -- ��,F�CK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
''' 6 0 -
i.
- Oa/1iT96 -
- 302700
- TaI�ENf{F�OOK - LUMBER SU F•t"'C:.Y; - ZhIC
- h'IISCELLANECIUa COMMODITIE a - - -- - -
-- s1�
.a .' - --
.a
260
06/11/96
302900
GL.ENWOOD INGL_EWOOD
WATER SERVICE MAY 9
85.40
(3.%..40
26037
06/11/96
320300
GREEN VALUE NURSERY
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
18.04
18.04
2 ,60 e( 0 67i 1796 - - _
324 520 --
- GI",UI -cCfi ' T'OWER __EQU IF'MENT -- -- - -
SUFF'I:IES - _ - EOUTPMEhTT -
- $ 0
86.
2603
06/11/96
330645
HEALTH EDUCATION SERVI
BOO KS
88.00
88 .00
26040
06/11/96
340110
HEJNY RENTALS, INC
PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES
69.23
69.23
-
2fat}1 QfaT179b
���(}7�I►(7 - _
WI$"tiSF�FIELI}- -_ _ _
.. - t..�UF•F•LIES - � - YANITOP:II -_ -
147.20
147:0
S,
2604:
06/11/96
351250.
HORIZON CHEMIC CO., INC.
CHEMICALS
93,40
93 «
26043
06/11/96
370076
HUGHES & COSTELLO
JUNE RETAINER FEE
4
4,75►O.00
' --
--
6044 -0-67- 1-1796-
-. -�i4� 00 - - --
- I CMA._ . _ - -- - -- - - - ---
Ei00KS -
9.
« 9.5 - -..
26 045
06/11/96
400950
JEANS THORNE TEMPORARY SERVICE
CLERK TYPIST TEMP WAGES
273,.60
_!
--
- - - -- __ - -
- - -- - -- - -
- -- - - - --
- - -- - - - - - -- - . - - -- - - - -- - -- ._..
- -- SECRETARY -- TEMP_ - WAGES- - - --
389.:7
-7�6.a 46- - - --
26046
06/11/9
459050
LAN I ER WORLD I DE
REPAIRS & MTNCE .. /E QUIPMEN T
88.00
8 8.00
26047
06/11/96
4,99200
LASERQUIP•
REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIP'ME'NT
155.15
155.15
�6048 '
Oct /11/96 - _
_ - 470770 - --
- - - --
LINK AUTOIrtATION-
- REPAIRS -'&- MTNCE .- /EQUIPMENT --
26049
06/11/9
500650
M.R.P.A.
TEAM REGISTRATION
2,656
2, 6 56 .00
'60',50
06/11/96
510100
MAPLE' LEAF OFFICIALS ASSN.
CONTRACTED SPORTS OFFICIAL. S
7,046.75
7 046.75
^!�0 �1
,�:.
06111/96
51.1b00 .
_... MASYS CORP' - ..- - -- - - - -
- ��UNE 1lATtiWARE" i'1AIlaT - - - - --
- - - - - - x$55- �� - - --
I'T35 M - 7r� - --
26052
06/11/96
5::0500
MC:GUIRE, MICHAEL.
VEHICLE ALLOWANCE:
450.00
450.00
2 6053
06/11/96
530500
h'IENARDS
MAIN'T'ENANCE MATERIALS
5.45
5 » 45
i
2 605-406/11/96
530730'
METRO ATHLETIC SUP'P'LY
PROGRAM SUPPLIES _ .
909'51
51 -
26055
06/11 /96
531400
METRO SALES INC.
REPA IRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT
116 . 3 5
1 1 6 .35
26056
06/11/96 •
540175
MIDWEST COCA--COLA BOTTLING CC).
MDSE. FOR RESALE
'144.85
i '
MD al . FOR RE SALE:
215 .',
MX}t:3E::« FOR RESALE
2^ 3.90
989.0° -
26057
06/11/96
550240
MN CITY /CO MGh1T AS;SOC ISE -CTY
SUBSCRIPTIONS & t'IENDE.'RSHIP S
151.21
151.21.
.... c�..,,
06/•11 X96.
c• • � �- r+
009
•�
M (')bFPf - -1 f�lrra F-r.�i � T F•I�rr�IT rn
�'+ a t' t••
_y
•� c. �'� t:� ".,
.� c1 �,,..., �,, ..,
VOUCHRE - 2
CITY
OF MA{- 'L_EWOOD
WAGE 5
06/07/96
07.52
VOUt:`HER /C:F•IECK
REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
rl- TEi,^:K
.- T:HECK .. -
VE'h1DC1FL
VrfaDClFti
_. __ _ .__.. - - -- - - - - -- - - -- --------------------
E - 1 - �- - - - - --
-- - - -- -C1•df:- i:K__.
NUMBER
DATE
NUlrlB 1:
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT ' t
^ ,Otir`
X111.796
5703-00
MONROE SYSTEMS FOR IM
. REF'AIRS & T1TNCE.:7E - UIIPMENI - _ -_ -`_
9 0-0
319:0? �.... -- - - - -.
26 060
06/11/96
570 500
MOTOROLA. INC
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
9.
9.27
26061
06/11/96
630100
NADE".AU, ED
TRAVEL & TRAINING
10-00
10.00
661181 '
KORTHERN AIR GAS
SUPPLIES -- E(1UIi= liE14T - - - -
f
26063.
06/11/96
661750
NORTHERN STATES POWER
UTILITIES 217
3.14
-
. UTILITIES - 220._._ - - - -_ - - - - -._
----------- 3 -
UTILITIES 771
3.1.4
UTILITIES 1540
3.
i p
_1600
- '�"r?1
UTILITIES 1975
3.1.4
UTILITIES 2268
4.40
i.
UTILITIES 2501
4.71
1
UTILITIES 2739
,3r 1.
I.ITIL:7:TIE"�•+ .x:.741.- - - - --
.:>:3�
! --
UTILITIES 510
79.52
UTILITIES 2276
143.90
- - -- _ -_ -_
-- -- - -
-- - -
- -- -- - - -- - -- -- - - -' - -- - -- - -- -- - --
- - "l1TTl �I TIES 2380_____
.3 U.
LITILITIE "S 6
•1
i'
:
UTILITIES 203
16.93
- - - --
_ - - -- - -
_ - -- ...- - -
- - - - -- _ - -. _ _. -- - - -- - - - - - -- -- -- ------
LITTLTTIES -618- -
16.76 -
- - -- - - - - - --
UTILITIES 1625
96.
LITIL_ITIEKS 1662
10.49
'.;.
--- - - - - --
__ -_-
- - _ -- -
- -- - -- -- . - -- -- -- -- -- -
- IJTIC_I 'T'IFS "-.84 5 -
3
- - - - - --
UTIL-.I:TIE`S 1845
64.72
UTILITIES 2001
43.:6
- -----
I1.:"I:TIE'S� �1tf:l -- -
M
7
UTILITIES 2133
7.35
UT'I:LITIE::S 9
252.74
--
_UTT.1... ITTES .. 474 - _7
?. 2
UT•IL.ITIF S 22t.10
35.63
UTILITIES 1695
159.09
�.
- 44I3 «77 - --
UTILITIES 1995
120.56
2 , 030 » O6
_` e?ir3r•4
ff671119 i
670950
NYSTF:C)M PUBLISHING COMPANY INC
MAPL..EWOOD IN MOTT -ON - - - -_. -- _- - ___
-_.__ _- - - - - -- a�9�3V7i0
- - - - - > 790: C3
26065
06/1.1/96
6911300
OSWAL_D HOSE & ADAPTERS
Sl.1F='PLIES - EQUIPMENT
25.88
25.88
26066
06/1.1./96
^ 6 ,2000
OWE :NS SE..RVIC CORP.
CHE. "MICALS
1 .92.0 1.
192.01.
- - 2606706/11/96
700735
PAI ... MA, STEVEN T
K... HANDLER _ - - --
- -- ------- -a5�00 -- - -- --
- - - - - -- �,� , -,- -- - --1:
i
26068
06/11/96
712 108
PIZZA HUT OF. AMERICA INC.
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
16.75
16 75
f'
:'.t�0•.'r`?
06/1.1/96
71.^1.1.5
POLAR CHEVROLET Cal =O
REF $ MATNT /VEHTCL_E
200.00
200. C-0
,
Vi:�l.�i:F�F:E�' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE" 6
VOtJCI Ik
. 06 07: 52 �li /CHECK F.EGI�a"1 "E�Fi
a
e VOUCHI::. V
CHE'CK
- _CHE:CK - - -- CHECK - - - - -- - VENDOR
e
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
9I _
6070 0-67 i - 1796`
---- -- -.__._--__
-- 7412 0C - -- - RAINBOW
,��-
1= 'Fi(:)(a1;iAM SlJ!°'F'LIES
55.30
MI)ISE:. w F'1 fR RE'SAI_F..
12.96
MISCELLANEOUS -- COMMODITIES_ --
- ,, .TAT -
PROGRAM SUPPL.IE::S
37 . 86
� 1
"
T'F'iA'JEI.. 13+. TkAlhi]:NG
14.4
!'
°(
2 6071
06/11/
741600
RAMSEY COUNTY
TIF FEES
1,130.3
1,130
2607
06/11/96
742155
RAMSE::Y CTY PROPERTY RECORDS
PRINTOUT OF PROPERTIES IN MW
140
PRINTOUT OF P ROPERTI ES IN MW
140.23
280.46
r, . _ _-
3
06/11/96
C
7505.0
.:
RE�INHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS
: « FOR RESALE RESALE RESALE
,yI".
MD SE .
514.98
514.9
260
;.
..
0
7 ► 51 300- -----
T:ICHARDS014; _RICHTER AS OC: - --
'TRAVEL � 'iF�AINING
t
�,j
26075
06/
780300
S&T OFF I CE_PRODUCTS INC - - -_
SUPPLIES - OFFIC
139.7
1 39.74
26076
06/11/96
780600
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
80.64
A/R --• EMPL OYEE C OFFEE
35.84
-
-- - - - - -- -- _ -
. - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- -- .... - -.
PROGRAM - SUPPLIES -
c` ::• • . c:+
MD FOFi RESALE
491.18
'1
MDSE. FOR RESALE
2 51.85
- ---------------
_. - - -- ------ - - - - -- -----
�'�OrF'�r�M - Sr.IPF'c:TES -
6 9
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
16.42
j"
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
6 ?.67
1,039.05
- - -- - - -- - -
6C) ??
06/11!96
842530
STATE OF MINNESOTA CPV PROGRAM
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS
350.00
350.00
r
SPORT « - INC :- _ -----
r--- - - - - --
F'F�O(aF+.AT'i '
- -- I ,TiO��� 0
-
1, 5 ?1 40
F'IRi:iGRAM SUi::'t ='LIES
67.20
--
r
-- -- -
- --- �*Fa4��i -
06111 f5'6 -
-- '3515�'S
SY.ST EM.ra SUPPLY, INC . - - - -- - -- - _ -
- -- - �uPr- LIES ..OFFICE .------------- - - - - --
`
------- - ---- �,� - -
!"'
SUPPL..IE :S -- OFFICE::
103.94
,
SUN::'LIES -- OFFICE
47. 89
,::� -_
--
-- ---
- -- - - - - --
- - - --
- -- - - - - -- - -- -- _
-- Y;t.1(= '1"'L.. CE" 5 - - �.. - .OF"F"7C�E - - --
- - r
SUPI:: k..:1:ES -- OFFICE:
9
.:l: k:S -•- OF °f" I CE :
23.91
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
47
380 25
•
'7JI
'
2 6000
06/11/96
860080
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIAL_ - -
- - - - - -- - -- 393 - - - - -
^- 393 r 43
26081
06/11/96
860650
TARGET STORE'S- "C1 7 C, A
S)U1 °'I._I - L ""QtJll= M['-°IAT
66.2
_
87 . 38
-s!
MA I N°FENANCE:: MATERIALS
21 J
6082
06/11/96
861677
THIENES, PAUL
TRAVEL & TRAINING
35.6'
33
TRAVk_L & TRAINING
TRAVEI... $- TF�AIi�iXl*IG
'.::5 r 0.5
K T1:;'A1't11Tf %1Gj
39. ;,0
133.
CITY OF' MAPLEWOOD
PACE 7
VOUCHER/CHECK FtiE- CaICa�'E:F�
-- -- -- - -- - --- -- - - - - - -- ------
- - - - -- -------- - -
- - --
Oc5 / <�/1 �'f.�
07:52
- - -
I:: 06
- - - .. - -__ _ - -
I
ITE
Ift
- Z': }Il" CK -
CFiEC:K -
AIENDOR
VENDOF:
DEGI I F`T ION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
: t
NUMBER
DAT1-
NUMBER
NAME
- %OCR
06/11/96
OOO Ti01
THE ADWAY GRAPHICS
' 'irjRAT1 ' SUPPL IE - - - -
_
- 'i7 .
26084
0Er /] ]. /9Cr
(390200
U O WT CELLULAR INC:
WEST
TELEPHONE
26 9
-- _
26.99
-- - - --
;1F
_
2608 �
06/ 11 /rr 6
0908 5
r
U « Sa . WEST CELLULAR'
CELLULAR SERVICE
CELLULAR SERVICE
27.72
- -
- -- -
U1.1r. LJ...UL::AF SE::F E
-
_
TELEPHONE
ba « 10
141 w ::i4
- - - 2 60 8 6
_06 71 �/ TG7
____
j�]�'�]�
S9' V 00
i7
/R _
j
1�1�1�7
-- -- -Y--P
-_ ��1 1
bO ti w 9. �
- f
TELEPHONE
57.47
TELEPHONE
,
TELEPHONE
57.40
57.40
'
TEI...F::PHONE
`
- - -- - - -- - - ..---
._— _ - - - - --
- -- - - - --
-- ----- - - - - --
- TEi�T"F'HO11E - - --
D7.40
57.40
TELEPHONE
-- - --
- -- - -- -- - —
ME L.FF1- 101.1E
57.40
TELEPHONE
57.40
TEL.E::F'HONE::
-- - - - -- - - - -
-- - -- - - - - -- — --
---- - - - - -- - FF'Ntalaf -�'-
5 7 . 40
57.40
TE'I...E'PH0NE'
57.40
�^
TELEPHONE
- — - -
-- �,
`:
TFIwt�F'I LONE
57 a
- - - - - -- -- - - - - --
-- — - - -- - --
55 w 9 "!'
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
362.1.8 ___
--- - - --
___
_
.
`6 . 8 1.
TELEPHONE
IT I.A:.PHONE
,a7.7.�
iti
_ - .. _ -- -
- - - -- - -- - - -- -
TE1:M4ONE
_ -- -- —
---- - - - - -- - - --
-
'T'I: L E:F'HOhtE.:
58.20
TELEPHONE
58.2t)
- - - --
— - - - --5� o —
TEL..EPHONE
74.29
TI'- :I...I ":r•: u:
63.09
- - - -- -- -
- - - --
TELEPHONE
• -rS
f:: :F'I••1()t•1E"
TEI._I= :PHONE
70w 0 -
- - - - -- - - - - - -- -
--
TEI...>- F'f1ONE"
_.
TE LI_i -•HONE
J/.
r'r:::1...F::F1 ai�raE.:
! 1.7
--
- - - - -- -- - - - - --
TELEPHONE -
- - -- -
55.9
TELEPHONE
127. 0[:3
TELEF+10f,1f*:.
57
TELEPHONE
i
i
!ei
1 +
VOUCHRE.^
CITY OF MAPL_EWOOD
PAGE 8
1'
06/07/96
07:52
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
is
-
FOR' '06
1 51
E ,
V(ILJC I.41 ::a-'i
- - --
- - --
- - - --
CI -lE"C I<
C:} If CK
Vf MDOF:
VENDOR -- - -- - - -- -- — — -
-- - -- - - - -- - - - -ITEM -- -- - -- -- - - - - -- - --
44 �
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRI
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
,o
------ - - - -
-- ------------------ - - - - -- -
- -- -- "TEL::EF'1-101dE—
3 2.76
-
TELEPHONE
57.6:3
5 , 912 » 65
112
'- - -- " - 26087 -
_ -796 - -- 901x00 -- --
UPPER MZDWEST SALES �0 � - -
-_._ ._ .- �UF'F'LIE� --= - �TANITOF.IAL�
,, a
SUPPLIES -° JANITORIAL
26
-
SUPPLIES - JANITORIA
255 r 49
i,o
- -- -- -
-- --- S1:Jl PI —. .TAN TORT t_
r38. Ye
SUPPLIES JANITORIAL
17.25
475.60
b
y '
.2'6088
06 /II %96
93055tQ - - - • - -
WAGERS 'DUSINESS 'SYSTEMS -`
-- MAINT ON_ COPIER IN MBR
49: O
- - 49 - . d
26089
06/11/96
940 50
WERFR- -'T•ROSET INC.
REP AIRS & MTNCE . /EQUIPMENT
123.95
123.
2609
06/11/96
980800
Z I EGLER INC
SUPPL_ I ES VEH I CL_E
52.
52.90
1 ;:r
TOTAL CHECKS
294,:353.35
I :
!"4
1
c
i
310
o .1
:?
k
aJ
L. '4�
47
.a
F � ,.
PAGE 1
VOUCHRE2"
- VOU
CHECK
FOR PERIOD 06
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
'
VENDOR
-
ITEM
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOtJN'T
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
6434
06/06/96
5+41400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
TREASURER
STATE DRIVERS.LIC FEES PAYABLE
M OTOR VEH J.= FEES PAYABLE
526.
526.75
22l,117-76.
6435
06/06/96
541400
MIN STATE
..22
6436
06/07/96
190400
DEFT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES
DNS. LICENSE FEES PAYABLE
426.00
426.00
6437
06/07/96
541400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE
4$0.00
-480 ,,00.
LIC PAYABLE
5
4
/
5
6439
06/07/96
890900
U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
598.01
3
TELEPHONE---
S
{
TELEPHONE
57
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
-57.39
57 39
'
TELEPHONE
57.39
z
TELEPHONE
5739
3
EE HO
5
TELEPHONE
57.39
s
TELEPHONE
AE
57.39
3
TELEP
- .57 0139
ti
TELEPHONE
57.39
TELEPHONE
5 r 39
ID
TELEPHONE
57.
TELEPHONE
57.39
TELEPHONE
57.63
TELEPHONE
55.97
TELEPHONE
55.97
TEL E.PHONE
354.0.6
TELEPHONE
26.82
TELEPHONE
26. 81
TELEPHONE
32.75
TELEPHONE
296
p
TELEPHONE
58.20
TELEPHONE
.58.20
TELEPHONE
174.60
1
TELEPHONE
74.2 9
44
.. TELEPHONE
189.27
189.27
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
31.55
' 1.55
�
TELEPHO
270 r 20
48
TELEPHONE
167 «09
TELEPHONE
5.40
TELEPHONE
711 «78
s '
TELEPHONE
226.74
TELEPHONE
55.97
_
T
124.88
TELEPHONE
1A724.60
TELEPHONE
55 .10
T
TELEPHONE
3Z «75
VOUCHRE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 yy �
06/14/96 07:54 VOUC /CHECK R EGISTER �e
FOR PERI 06 ,
2 •
3
VnUCHER/ 4
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME.
6440
06/11/96
541400
MINN.
STATE
06/10/96
541400
MINN.
STATE TREASURER
6441
06/10/9
541400
MINN.
STATE TREASURER
6442
06/10/96
750600
SAM'S
CLUB DIRECT
6443
06/11/96
541400
MINN.
STATE
TREASURER
6444
06/11/96
541400
MINN.
STATE
TREASURER
6445 06/12/96 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER
6446 06/12/96 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER
26097 06/18/96. HODAPP, KATHY
26098 06/18/96
26099 06/18/96
26100 06/18/96
26101 06/18/96
26102 06/18/96
26103 06/18/96
26104 06/i8/96
26105 06/18/96
REFUND --
PRORATED CORP MEMB
96.75
96.75
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
14 •
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
24 477.13
REFUND -
3M FAM MEMB
140.62
140.62
6
1 12 1
REFUND --
SWIM CLASS CANCELLED
37.00
37.00
7
�
io
REFUND --
SWIM LESSON
37.00
37.00
s1.
10.00
MEMBERSHIP FEES
10.00
REFUND -
GROUP OVERPAID
24.00
24.00
REFUND
- SWIM LESSON
74.00
74.00
67
26106 06/iS/96
26107 06/18/96
ALLIANCE HOME BUILDERS
MCSHANNOCK, VIOLET
LEMIRE, JULIE
SCHAFFER ERIC
THORWICK, TONI
NASVIK, .JULIE
I SD #626
MOWCHAN, GUNBORG
REUTER, BLAKE
ARNQUIST. JAC
26108 06/18/96 BLEEDr THOMAS
REFUND - PRESCHOOL KARATE 19.00 19.00
71
REFUND - PRESCHOOL KARATE 16.04 16.00
73
Rprumn - PRnRATED REFUND 104.19 104.19 -.
STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE
513.75
513.75
13
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
14 •
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
24 477.13
24 477.13
16
MEMBERSHIP FEES
25.00
6
1 12 1
17
;Q�
MEMBERSHIP FEES
10.00
MEMBERSHIP FEES
10.00
21
MEMBERSHIP FEES
10.00
MEMBERSHIP FEES
10.00
24
MEMBERSHIP.FEES
10.00
MEMBERSHIP FEES
.10.00
ME MBE F
MEMBERSHIP FEES
10.00
105.00
29
3+ ,-
STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE
586.00
586.00
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
18
1$,555.28
33
STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE
509.00
509.00
37
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
16 202.81
16 202.81
REFUND ONE HALF OF ESCROW
7,000.00
41
0
• FUND ONE HALF OF ESCROW
24. 52
REFUND GRADING ESCROW REC10192
1,000.00
s
REFUN GRADING ESCROW REC10192
2.60
1
do
REFUND - CK SENT IN ERROR
34.08
34.08
s
S1 0
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
s
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
61
TELEPHONE
.32.75
e
s
TELEPHONE
187.19
6
1 12 1
10
y VOUCHREZ
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 3
's 06/14/96
07:54 . 1
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
2
FOR PERIOD 06
3 VOUC E
4 CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
,'CHECK
5 NUMBER
s
DATE
NUMBER NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
7 26109
06/18/96_
GALLO, ROSE
REFUND.-
SR.RES MEMB PRORATED
35►.40
35.40
8
9 26110
06/18/96
LINDERO SCOTT
REFUND -
MEMB PRORATED
329.16
329.16
11 26111
12
06/18/96
MARTI, DIANNE
REFUND -
.COACH'S
14.00
14.0.0
i 26112
06/18/96
HILL, NANCY
kEP'UND --
COACH'S
14.00
14.00
14
t5 2 6113
06/18/96
FR M
0.
16
17 26114
t8
06/18/96
TRISTANI, MARK
REFUND -
COACHING
14.00
14.00
t 26115
06/18/96
SCHMIDT„ BILL
REFUND --
COACHING
19.00
19.00
26116
06/18/96
SKINNER SKINNER PAM
REFUND _
COACHING
00
19.00
23 26117
24
06/18/96
CHURCHILL, JANICE
REFUND -
COACHING
19.00
19.00
25 26118
06/18/96
PEICHP LISA
REFUND -
ADULT V.B. -
8.00
. 8.00
27 26119
06/18/96
ARTHUR 0. HAUKLAND
CLUB INC.2 REFUND
ADULT V.B.
16,0
26120
06/18/96
KULAS, DIANE M.
REFUND --
ADULT V.B.
8.00
8.00
31 1 1- 1 6121
06/18/96
KOTTENv KAYE
REFUND -
:COACHING
14.00
14.00
32
26122
06/18/96
BEHRENDS DILL
REFUND -
COACHING
19.00
O
35 26123
3s
06/18/96
FLORES, GENE
REFUND
COACHING
14.00
14.00
37 26124
06/18/96
ESCH, MIKE
REFUND •-
COACHING
14.00
14.00
3e
26125
06/18/96
L AUMER, CHARLENE
REFUND -
COACHING
14.00
14.00
41 26126
42
06/18/96
MACHOVEC, MIKE
`REFUND
COACHING
19.00
19.00
43 26127
44
06/18/96
P I LLAR p TIM
REFUND --
COACHING
19.00
19..00
45 26128
06/18/96
SHANKAR ANANTH
REFU -
COACHING
14.00
14.00
147 26129
48
06/18/96
MONTEIRO, ANTONIO
REFUND -
COACHING
14.00
14.00
j4 26130
06/18/96
SINN, BRIAN
REFUND -
COACHING
14.00
14.00
51 26131
06/18/96
GEISER CURT
REFUND. --
COACHING
14.00
14.00
I52
I53 26132
06/18/96
SHAND, MIKE
REFUND -
COACHING
14.00
14.00
i
j,'•
155 26133
11%
06/18/96
MCCABE, DALE
REFUND -
SOCCER ERIN
14.00
14.00
57 26134
06/18/96
MIKE BRUCE
REFUND --
COACHING
14.00
14.00
n
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
P AGE . 4 y
�e
VOUCHRE..
VOU I '1S -
,
06/14/96
07:54
FOR
PER IOD 06
?
3
•
VOUCHER/
CHECK'
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK 6
- AMOUNT , �
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
e
s
26135
06/18/96
GRUBERv ELIZABETH
REFUND - COACHING
30.00
30.00 ,o
•
12
,3
2,613 6
06/ i x:3 /2.6
R
REFUND GRADING ESCROW REC 9689
_
30.41
1030.41 14
•
06/19/26
010465_
A T
s
26137
••+
x.6138
06/ 181'96
_
5
010..60
AC E AUTO FARTS
SUPPLIES - 'tlENICLE
SUPPLIES-- VEH
125.00
,e
s
3
2,
�
•. --
26139
06/18/96
010575
ACE HARDWARE
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
22.47
2 9
483 4
SU PPLIES JANITOR
26140
06/18/96
^ '�*
0208.5
RITE ELECTRIC COMPANY
ALL R
INSTALL OUTSIDE PHOTOCELL
492.00
4192.00
�
26141
06/18/96
031100
AP'P'EARANCE PLUS
CAR .WASHES
94.67
94.67
3,
•
261 42
06 8/96
4 70A
40SP
e
26143 06/18/96 042200 ASSOCIATED BUREAUS. INC. - FEES PRIMARY' LETTER FROG BILL, 30.00 30.00 3s
.6144
06/18/96
061480
BARNES $. NOBLE
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
21.09
211.09
' •
26145
06/18/96
061906
BAUER BUILT
SUP'P'LIES -
g ,"5
51. 35 40
4,
26146
9
Ob/18/ 6
061950
BEACON BALL_FIELDS
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
+450.16
454.16
n
x.6147
06/18/96
071450
BIEF'S
SAT. SVC.
253.73
X53.73
s
26148
06/18/96
080925
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
W UTILITIES
15.
5.14
s
WATER UTILITIES
4.83
WATER UTILITIES
51
W ATER
WATER UTILITIES.
30.59
WATER UTILITIES
49.72
50
WATER UTILITIES
1 114.5:
1
s
26149
06/18/96
T
081230
BOYE R TRUCK FARTS
SUPPLIES �- VEHICLE
3.41
3.41
9 4
^ 5
x.6150
O6/ 1 8/96
101350
BUILDERS SQUARE
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
5.42
5.42
26151
06/18/96
110150
C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES
FEES FOR SERVICE r
Empl oyee
_ 44 00
App l icat iq
40.00
s
. %o
•
79.00
26152.
06/18/96
110455
CAREER TRACK SEMINARS
TRAVEL & TRAINING
26153
06/18/96
110503
CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY
WALKER PLA COMPACTOR
6,$85.2'
6'885"
�
26154
06/18/96
131100
CHIP'PEWA SPRIN LTD
W ATER SERVICE
158.26
158.26
26155
06/18/96
140700
COLEMAN, MELINDA
TRAVEL & TRAINING
...r -.. r P%1 1'O At. 1 Pf1.tA1.I P`C
33.91
43 - _ -
77.03
- ---
76
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 5
y
's 06/14/96
07-54
VOUCH /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD Ob
2
3 VOUCHE
4 CHE
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
S NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
s
r 26156
06/18/96
150175
COLLINS ELECT. CONST. CO.
:REPAIRS, ,,& MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT
419.73
419.73
8
e 261
/ 8/
AMR BUILDING RV
R
32
32
10
11 26158
06/18/96
170400
CYBEX DIVISION OF LUMEX. INC.
PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES
22.98
22.98
12
13 26159
14
06/18/96
180100
D.C.A.,INC.
DENTAL CLAIMS CHECK RUN 060696
2,454.74
2
15 2 61 , 60,
9
h
DAVIS LOCK &-SAFE
SMALL TOOLS
.208.76
s
LOCK & PARTS
44.86
1r
SUPPLIES -- EQUIPMENT
27.45
18
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
79.68
19
FIX LOCK
69.50
430.25
21 26161
R T
26162
06/18/96
230900
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
APRIL. USAGE. MAY MINIMUM
181.78
4
APRIL USAGE MAY MINIMUM
6.36
APRIL. USAGE, MAY MINIMUM
1.13.59
APRIL USAGE. MAY MINIMUM
256.77
r
APRIL USAGE MAY MINIMUM
14.92
APRIL USAGE,, MAY MINIMUM
85.94
APRIL USAGE. MAY MINIMUM
425.24
APRIL USAGE MAY MINIMUM
244
1
31
26163
06/18/96
240375
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE
.106.00
RE
5 5
26164
06/18/96
240750
ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
37.23
37..23
r 26165
06/18/96
250060
ENGRAPHICS, INC.
SUP'P'LIES EQUIPMENT
27.96
27.96
26166
06/18/96
260286
FAMILY SERVICE INC.
7/1/96 -12/31/96 SERVICES
16 300.00
16 300.00
41 26167
06/18/96
260400
FAUST. DANIEL
TRAVEL & TRAINING
850.69
850.69
26168
06/18/96
280250
FORTMEYER & LANG PRINTERS
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
115.73
s
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
60.00
175.73
26169
06/18/96
300500
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS $.CLOTHING
6.29 -
r
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
60.29
U & CLOTHING
59.91
s
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
72.47
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
43.24
UNIFORMS .& CLOTHING
59.91
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
72.47
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
43.24
UNIFOR & CLOTHING
59..91.
fb
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
72.47
r
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
43.24
580.86
VOUCHFiE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ..._
«,9
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
,
VOUCHER/
2
3
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM �^
ITEM
5
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CHECK
6
AMOUNT
7
26170
06/18/96
341:75
WALTER M. GEISSLER
COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICE
75.00
75.00
9
26171.
06118196
310250
GOODYEAR AUTO SER VICE CENTER
REPAIR $. MAINT /VEHICLE
109.58
10
11
12
REPAIR , & MAINT /VEHICLE
101
210.92
13
26172
06/18/96
3.10260
GOODYEAR
REPAIR ,& MA INT /VEHICLE
294 .53
14
15
16
REPAIR .$ MAINT /VEHICLE
31.68
326.51
n
26173
06/18/96
310650
GOPHER DISPOSAL
APRIL 96 RECYCLING
17 879.04
17 879 «04
18
26174
06/18/96
320260
GRAF, MICHAEL
VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
11.20
11.20
21
26.175
06/18/96
3
GRAINGER
SUPPLIES -- EQUIPMENT
435.19
235.19
26176
06/18/96
320281
GRANDMA'S FAKERY INC.
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
14.75
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
13.75
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
13.75
PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES
18.75
31
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
13.75+
.PROGRAM SUPPLIES
13.75
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
13.75
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
13.
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
13.75
129.75
26177
06/18/96
330200
HAMERNICK DECORATING CENTER
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
- 141.20
41
MISCELLANEOUS COMMODITIES
73. Si.
414 «71
2617
06/18/96
340110
HEJNY RENTALS, INC
OUTSIDE RENTAL,.. - EQUIPMENT
64.00
64 «00
26179
06/18/96
350700
HIRSHFIELDS
SUPPLIES - .JANITORIAL
9.1.26
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
55.72
s
SUPPLIES -- EQUIPMENT
48.24
195.
so
s1
26180
06/18/96
351400
HORWATH, THOMAS
TREE INSPECTIONS
990.00
990.00
26181
06/18/96
370076
HUGHES & COSTELLO
FEES.FOR SERVICE
568.00
568.00
2618.2
06/18/96
390100
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. 0622
PUBLISHING
51.00
�
81 «00
26183.
06/18/96
390375
INSTY PRINTS PLUS
PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES_
, 89.,42
89.42
s'
26184
06/18/96
400650
J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOS INC.
AP PLIANCES RECYCLED
241.00
APPLIANCES RECYCLED
254.00
AP'P'LIANCES RECYCLED
183.00
I
A PPLIANCES RECYCLED
91.00
769 «00
26185
06/18/96
460950
JEANE THORNE TEMPORARY SERVICE
CLERK TYPIST TEMP
273.60
TEMP SERVICES RECEPTIONIST
85.50
71
TEMP SERVICES CLERK TYPIST
2 18.88
577.98
_
J 13
26186
06/18/96
401 250
JIM HATCH SALES CO.
SMALL TOOLS
162.22
.162.22
.�
L
VAUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPL_EWOOD
PAGE 7
06/1!q/96
07 .5
VOUCHER /CHECK
REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
2
3
4 CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
5 NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
6
7 26187
8
9 . 26188
06/18/96
410280
2
KAR PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES -- .JANITORIAL
264.23
264.23
0
11 26189
06/18/96
430300
XNOWL.AN ' S
PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES
17.86
9
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
34..01
51.87
13
14 26190
06/18/96
430970
KRECH'S BUSINESS SYSTEMS., INC.
'SUPPLIES -- OFFICE
53.14_
53.14
,5
% 26191
06/18/96
.459000
LANDSCAPE ALTERNATIVE5p INC.
SUPPLIES - ` EQUIPMENT
229.67
229.67
n
is 26192
06/18/96
470700
LILLIE BUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS
AD EOR LIFEGAURD
145.60
s
PUBLISHING FOR MAY 96
115.94
21
PUBLISHING FOR MAY 96
PUBLISHING FOR MAY 96
739.62
713-72
PUBLISHING FOR MAY 96
8$.56
ipi68044
4 26193
06/18/96
70930
LODMILL SUE
DRAMA INSTRUCTION
375.
75.00
26194
06/18/96
501600
MAIL.E ENTERPRISESp INC.
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
392.02
392.02
r
20 •26195
06/18/96
510100
MAPLE LEAF OFFICIALS ASSN.
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL TONY PAGER
48.00
48.00
261 96
06/18/96
510.500
MAPL EWOOD BAKERY
MDSE. FOR RESALE
670.79
670.79
31
26197
06/18/96
511750
MAUTZ PAINT CO.
SUPPLIES - .-JANITORIAL
233. 52
233.5
26198
06/18/96
520550
MCLAUGHLINp DILLY
-CONCERT PMT
Ip990.00
1p990.00
2619
06/18/96
531660
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
SAC CHARGES APRIL
b 200.00
162.00-
16„038.00
r
SAC CHARGES APRIL
2620
06/18/96
540175
MIDWEST-COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO.
MDSE. FOR RESALE _
268.95
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
352.70
621.65
tt
26201
06/18/96
540825
MINN. DEPT OF HEALTH
TRAVEL & TRAINING
2 3.00
23.00
26202
06/18/96
540880
MINN. DEFT. OF REVENUE
SALES TAX PAYABLE
2p287.00
5
SALES TAX PAYABLE
11.00
SALES TAX PBL. OUT OF STATE
12.00
29310.00
7
26203
06/18/96
542400
MINNESOTA RECRE &
ST TO URN BERTH
110.00
110..00
9
26204
51
06/18/96
370090
MOGREN BROS.
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
20.00
20.00
26205
06/18/96
570500
MOTOROLAp INC
REPAIR & MAINT /RADIO
304.96
304.96
53
26206
06/18/96
630015
N.C.C.E.M. HEADQUARTERS
SUBSCRIPTIONS &. MEMBERSHIP'S
75.00
75.00
26207
57
06/18/96
640550
NELSONp JEAN
VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
38.14
38.14
1
t
VOUC:HRE2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
WAGE 8
0 b /14/9b
07:54
VOU GH-ER
SHE- K_5F�
FOR PER 0 6
2 1
3
.;
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK S
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
e
26208
06/18/9b
b60900
NORTH STAR TURF, INC,
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
414.84
s
10
SUP'P'LIES _ EQUIPMENT
.250-
11
SMALL TOOLS
164.83
12
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
93.1
9 13
1! 1
26209
06/18/96
661181
NORTHERN AIRGAS
SUP'P'LIES - EQU
157.15
15
157.15 to
26210
06/18/96
.661755
NORTHERN STATES POWEP
UTILITIES
1�367.Sb
18
s �
UTILITIES
43.95
.
UTILITIES
7,533.96
$,945.4'7 21
26211
06/18/96
663302
NOW SPORTS
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
5.58.00
3I
558.00
ro
26212
06/18/96
680600
OCTOPUS CAR WASH
CAR WASHES
112.50
27 '
CAR WASHES
7
CAP WASHES
7.50
127.50
2621.3
06/18/96
691150
ONE HOUR MOTO PHOTO
PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES
648
31
6.38
26214
06/18/96
700800
PAPER WAREHOUSE INC.
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
$7.23
PROGRAM.SUPPLIES
6 - 92
PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES
11.30
105.45
26215
06/18/96
700870
PARAGON CABLE
SOUND SYSTEM
24
77.24
2
26216
06/18/96
711500
PHOTOS TO GO
DEVELOP FILM
15.92
5.28
DEVELOPE FILM
DEVELOP' FILM -
3.94
25.14 5
26217
06/18/96.
720600
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
306.00
7
306.00
9
26218
06/18/96
741200
RAINBOW FOODS
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
15.11
15..11 51
26219
06/18/96
750550
REINHART INSTITUTIONAL
FOODS MDSE. FOR RESALE
152.74
522.84
675.58
MDSE. FOP RESALE
26220
06/18/96
751450
RITZ CAMERA
FILM PROCESSING
5.74
5.74
26221
06/18/96
761200
ROAD RESCUE INC.
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
.70.10
70.10
26222
06/18/96
780300
S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES -- OFFICE
56.02
MISCEL COMMODITIES
12.83
5 !
MISCELLANEOUS COMMODITIES
12.83
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
24.98
,!
SUP'P'LIES -
105.44-
l
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
27.97
01
SUPPLIES -- OFFICE
50.76
711
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
27.97--
262.86 721
r
263.
26223.
06/18/96
780750
SAWYER, CHERYL
ENTERTAINMENT ON 6/1 DARE
200.00
200,00 426223.
F�
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE
y
's 06/14/96
07:54
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
_
FOR
PERIOD Ob
x
3 VOUCHER/
4 CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
5 NUMBER
6
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
26224
06/18/96
830900
SOUTTER
VEHICLE. ALLOWANCE
2.55
2.55
e
s 2 62- 2 5
06/18/96
84030
ST.PAUL BOOK & STATION
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
18.06
m
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
18.05
36.11
12 26226
06/18/96
840800
ST.PAUL RAMSEY MEDICAL CENTER
SUP'P'L - EQUIPME
1,345.
1.345.20
13
14 26227
06/18/96
840801
ST. PAUL,.-- RAMSEY MEDICAL CTR.
HEPATITIS SCRN
18.00
18.00
16 26228
06/18/96
843537
STRATUS COMPUTER INC.
REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT
2
2
n
18 26229
06/18/96
850340
SUMMIT INSPECTION SERVICES LTD.
FEES FOR SERVICE
5,317480
19
DEFERRED.REVENUE ELEC.PERMIT
610647.25
2i
ELECTRIC PERMIT FEES.
6 9 647.25--
5x317.80
26230
06/18/96
860080
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS,, INC
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
175.49
VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIAL
1
1
26231
06/18/96
860650
TARGET STORES -CPC, A/R
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
9.46 .
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
26.46
35.92
26232
06/18/96
860700
7AUTGES REDPATH & CO.v LTD.
PREP PENSION FUND PROJECTIONS
686.00
686.00
30 26233
06/18/96
861630
THE GUTHERIE THEATER
PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES
3 6.00
36
31
26234
06/18/96
871600
TOUSLEY_FORD INC.
REPAIR.CITY.VEH -DAMAGED IN ACC
1.
1
26235
06/18/96
880750
TROY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES
SUP'P'LIES -- JANITORIAL
311.04
REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT
29.29
SUPPLIES -- EQUIPMENT
451.65
SUPPLIES- EQUIPMENT
327.81
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
311.04
1
26236
06/18/96
881320
TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT AND
TOW
47.93
47.93
41
26237
06/18/96
890895
U.S. WEST:CELL
CELLULAR PHONE
63.73
63.73
3
26238
06/18/96
890900
U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE.
392.93
392.93
26239
06/18/96
890905
U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
605.91
TELEPHONE
57.47
TELEPHONE
57.40
TELEPHONE
57.40
TELEPHONE
57.40
51
TELEPHONE
57.40
TELEPHONE
57.40
TELEPHONE
57.40
TEL EP HO NE
57.40
TELEPHONE
57.40
TELEPHONE.
57.40
TELEPHONE
57.40
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE-10
VOUCHRE2
VOU / HM R
�.:
06/ 14/96
07:54
FOR PERIOD 06
2 �
3
CHECK CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR ITEM
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
6
, 1
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME DESCRIPTION
_
s
s
.
TELEPHONE
57.40
,.
10
TELEPHONE
57.40
TELEPH
5
t2
13
_
TELEPH
57.40
14 4
TELEPHONE
57 . 63
is
TELEPHONE
55.97
17
- ---- --
TEL
55.97
,e
TELEPHONE
., 362
.,
s
TELEPHONE
21
TELEPHONE
26 . 81
TELEPHONE
37.75
3 I
TELEPHONE
296,
5
TE LEPHONE
�
TELEPHONE
58 »20
27
TELEPHONE
58.20
TELEPHONE
74.29
TELEPHONE
63.09
31
TELEPHONE
58.2 0
TELEPHONE
31 . 55
TELEPHONE
270020
TELEPHONE
16.7.49
1 7 '
TELEPHONE
57.40
TELEPHONE
71.78
TELEPHONE
75 » 58
4
TELEPHONE
55.97
42
TELEPHONE
12 7.08
TELEPHONE
1 728.33
i
s.
TELEPHONE
55.10
TELEPHONE
32.76
4 7
.
TELEPHONE
32 «7b
57..63
5, 519.72
°
TELEPHONE
51
26 240
06/18/96
890980
UWS DUMPSTERS
90.20
296.88
DUMPSTERS
OUPMSTEPS
123.05
DUMPSTERS
105.47
1.003.40
1,619.00.
RECYCLING CHARGES
o '
26241
06/18/96
900100
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED :UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
71..01
26 O5
s,
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
"
608.22
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
400.00
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
142.02
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
194.35
-
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
57.51
G
UNIFORMS $. CL..OTHCLOTHING
122.2 b
,c
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
69.73
„
UNIFORMS & CL
26.05
,-
':
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
194 «26
215.26
2,126.72
,�
,;
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
>' �; t:l(Ji:' i �I�:I :;
CITY
C. F MAI�9._F..:�if.)OD
PAGE 1.1.
061:1.419!>
07 : 54
VOUCHE RVCI•• ECK REGISTER . _ .. . - - - - - - -- . ._
—.. - - -- — — - - - - - - -- - -
-.— — - - - - -- _ - - - --
1 ::T) s
Pf::R I COD 06
NUMBER
i "F:IEC
DA'T {:`
VENDOR
Fit
V E t, I D r
NAME
ITE lvl
DE SCR I PT I ON
ITE::M
A
CHECK i
AMOUNT
Ft
- -- :� f_..?4::'
06/10/96
901. 00
UF' 'ELF hIIU�JC::�iT SAL E`S CO«
SUF'F'L_IES. w' �1ANITOFtiIAI
134.88
1
. - -2 ft 43 _
_06!1.8!96
0650
_VULCAN_ SIGN CO._ _ — ..._ —...
SIGNG & SIGNALS -
4 4_ 74
- -44.._ 4
;�`E• x'44
06/1.8/96
9: y 1.1 0
WAL_I3(:)F; F'UhiF'
F:EPA I F:S P MTNC:E" . /E QLJ IF�'MENT
1, 738.91
26245
06/18/96
9 a 1 00
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
140.,00
�
COMM F='LUMBING INSPECTIONS
17 .00
1,4
COMM .-- t='LUMB I NG_..INSPECTIONS
175
1..40..00
26246
06/ 18/T6
934100
WASH I F IGTON CF:I ME NEWS SE :F.�! I CF. S
SUBSC.I PT IONS & MEMBERSHIPS
F
345.00
345.00 �
262
06/ 1.3196
98019
7_ARNOTH E• RUSVI WORKS. INC.
SUf I" L_IF_S �- t!lMhiICLE
SUPPLIES
496 . ���i
49F., « ::��i ; ' 6 .
�,
— -- —
— ,. - -- -- - -- -- - -- — —
i 281!
TOTAL CHECKS
239v339.27
3n;
-- -- -
�
3'.
34
'15
3f
1>; t
l an'
CHECK NUMBER
�.�rwwwrwwrww��
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT.DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT :DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
�wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww�w�ww
AMOUNT
wwwww�w�
06/14/96
ALLENSPACH,SHERRY
wwwwwww�w�wwwww�w�
309.77
06/14/96
CARLSON,THM SE
1,414.81
46/14/96
BODINE,RENEE
1
06/14/96
FAUST, DANIEL F
2
06/14/96
ANDERSON,CAROLE J
1
0.6/14/96
DEHN,DEBORAH
698.81
06/14/96
HANGSLEBEN,RICHARD
1
06/14/96
KLAGER,WENDY
1
06/14/96
VIGNALO,DELORES A
1
06/14/96
BEHM,LOIS
1
06/14/96
CARLE,JEANETTE E
1
06/14/96
JAGOE,CAROL
1,247.14
06/14/96
OLSON,SANDRA
892.55
06/14/96
POWELL,PHILIP
1
06/14/96
ALDRI DGE , MARK
1 4 31.14
06/14/96
BECKER, RONALD D
2 , 02 3.97
06/14/96
BOHL,JOHN C
2
06/14/96
FLOR,TIMOTHY
1
06/14/96
KVAM,DAVID
1,730.84
06/14/96
STEFFEN,SCOTT L
1
06/14/96
YOUNGREN,JAMES
2
06/14/96
EVERSON,PAUL
1
06/14/96
FRASER,JOHN
2
06/14/96
SAUNDERS,SARAH
1
1
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE.GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
2
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE.
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
:DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
ADELSON, LINDA
839024
DIRECT DEPOSIT
0 6/14/96
STAHNKE , .JULIE A
1 5 4 9.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
HAIDER, K:ENNETH G
2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
1 5 7 5.51
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
LUNDSTEN , LANCE
1 8 8 8.4 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
OSWALD , ERI CK D
1 3 7 4.71
DIRECT DEPOSIT
-0 6 / .14 / 9 6
DUCHARME , JOHN
1, 415.51
:DIRECT DEPOSIT
0.6/14/96
MATTHYS , RUS S
2 15 9.51
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
PECK , DENNI S L
l , 711.8 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
ANDERSON , BRUCE
2 , 3 9 2.9 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
BURKE , MYLES R
1 4 2 5.91
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
I+MARUSKA, MARK A
1 .71
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
GREW- HAYMAN , JANET M
8 4 2.3 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
BARTA, MARI E
1 2 3 7.11
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
COLEMAN , MELINDA
2 4 0 2 .7 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
EKSTRAND , THOMAS G
1 7 3 7.9 6
IIZECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
ROBERTS , KENNETH
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT'
06/14/96
STAPLES , PAULINE
2 101.11
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
EASTMAN , THOMAS E
1 8 9 3 .0 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
OLSON , RONALD J
1 2 6 0.31
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
TAYLOR, KATHERINE
19.5 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
RATHBURN RODNEY
5 2 6.7 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
HURLEY , STEPHEN
1 7 3 3.7 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J
1,725.11
2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
3
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
___-- -
DATE
-- - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
- �------ --- --
AMOUNT
-. --
_.. - - - --
DIRECT DEPOSIT
- - -
0 6 / 14 / 9 6
------------------ -
EDGE , DOUGLAS
--------------- -
1,18 4.71
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
BROTTEM, TRACY
3 7.5 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06./14/96
CROSSON, LINDA
l , 018.71
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
L I GSTON, JOYCE L
697.08
DUCT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN
1, 0 7 3.91
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
KNAUS S, PETER
705088
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/
SALITROS , DARLENE
5 6 0.2 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
PALMA , STEVEN
2 , 0 4 2.2 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
JOHNSON , KEVIN
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
BARTEL , DENISE
1 3 3 3.91
DMECI DEPOSIT
06/14/96
WARMAN , ROBIN
694963
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
BEHAN , JAMES
1 0 5 9.9 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
HANSEN, LESLIE
1,19 6.69
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
AFFOLTER , PENNY J
5 7 9.6 4
DUCT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
COLLINS , KENNETH V
2 , 6 6 8.9 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
HURT , CAROL J
117.7 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
KANE , MICHAEL R
1 8 2 2.71
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
D.OHERTY , KATHLEEN M
1 3 3 7.11
DIRECT DEPOSIT
0
JENSEN , MATTHEW
748951
CT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
PLACHECKI , DELI S SA J
6 4.5 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
LE , SHERYL
2 , 3 2 8.3 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
DOWDLE, VIRG.I.NIA
2 ,181.19
DIRECT DEPOSIT
- 0 6 / 1.4 / 9 6
HEINZ , STPIEN J
1 8 9 8.71
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06114/
COLEMAN ,PHILIP
2 2 9.4 0
3
,rte
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
\
FOR TH E CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
�m mmmm i&low �i i iii �ww
DIRECT DEPO SIT
06/14/96
BASTIAN , GARY W
3 5 2.0 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
SAVAGEAU, STEPHEN D
1, 116.01
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/14/96
ROSSBACH, GEORGE .
309977
52 633
0 6/ 14 / 9 6
CARLSON . DALE
309977
52634
06/14/96
KOPPEN,MARVIN
309977
5:263
06/14/96
CASAREZ,GINA
1,155.51
52636
0 6/ 14 / 9 6
CONRAD , B►ROOKE N
19 4.7 5
52637
06/14/96
DAWSONI CRAIG W
2 ,121.80
52638
06/14/96
HENSLEY,PATRICIA
159.36
52639
06/14/96
MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A
3,738977
52640
06/14/96
NELSON,BRIAN
320.00
52641
06/14/96
ZICK,LINDA
161.00
52642
06/14/96
PIEKARSKI,GREGORY J.
26.25
52643
06/14/96
CUDE,LARRY J
348900
52644
06/14/96
MIKISKA,WILLIAM
216.80
52645
06/14,/96
OSTER,ANDREA J
1,337911
52646
06/14/96
DeBILZAN,JUDY
486.09
52647
06 / 14 / 9 6
MATHEY S, ALANA K
1 418.9 3
52648
06 /14/96
FRY,PATRICIA
896935
52649
06/14/96
JOHNSON,BONNIE
758.48
52650.
06/14/96
KELSEY,CONNIE L
738902
52651
0 6/ 14 / 9 6
VI ETOR , LORRAINE S
1 5 0 6.8 7
52652
06/14/96
MARTINSON, CAROL F
1, 237.11
52653
06/14/96
PALANK,ARY KAY
1
,rte
5
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
DATE
-- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------ -
AMOUNT
52654
06/14/96
- - - -- ---------------
RI CHI E,CAROLE L
- - - --
1,254.05
52655
06/14/96
RYAN,MICHAEL
2,211.62
52656
06/14/96
SVENDSEN, JOANNE M
1,499.03
5.2657
06/14/96
BANICK,JOHN J
2
52658
06/14/96
BARTZ,PAUL
1
52659
06/14/96
BELDE,STANLEY
1
52660
06/14/96
BOWMAN,RICK A
2
52661
06/14/96
CASSEM,TERRY E
1
52662
06/14/96
DREGER,RICHARD C
2
52663
06/14/96
DUNN,ALICE
1,740930
52664
06/14/96
HELLE,KERRY
1,105982
52665
06/14/96
HERBERT,MICHAEL J
1
52666
06/14/96
HIEBERT,STEVEN
1
52667
06/14/96
LANG,RICHARD J
1, 796.22
52668
06/14/96
RAZSKAZOFF,DALE
1
52669
06/14/96
ROSSMAN,OAVID A
1
52670
06/14/96
SKALMAN,DONALD W
2,504.09
52671
06/14/96
STAFNE,GREGORY L
2,010.92
52672
06/14/96
STILL,VERNON T
1
52673
06/14/96
STOCKTON,DERRELL T
1,796.22
52674
06/14/96
SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J
1
52675
06/14/96
THIENES,PAUL
1 1 797.98
52676
06/14/96
WATCZAK,LAURA
1
52677
06/14/96
WELCHLIN,CABOT V
1
5
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
D
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
52678
06/14/96
ANDREWS,SCOTT A
2
52679
06/14/96
BERGERON,JOSEPH A
2
52680
06/14/96
KARIS,FLINT D
2,129.59
52681
06/14/96
MEEHAN,JAMES
2
52682
06/14/96
MELANDER,JON A
2
52683
06/14/96
RABBETT,KEVIN
2
52684
06/14/96
THOMALLA,DAVID J
1
52685
06/14/96
VORWERK,ROBERT E
1
52686
06/14/96
HEWITT,JOEL A
2
52687
06/14/96
EMBERTSON,JAMES M
1
52688
06/14/96
BOYER,SCOTT K
1
52689
06/14/96
FEHR,JOSEPH
1
52690
06/14/96
FLAUGHER,JAYME L
1
52691
06/14/96
HALWEG,KEVIN R
2 1 329.55
52692
06/14/96
LAFFERTY,WALTER
1
52693
06/14/96
PETERS,JILL
720.15
52694
06/14/96
RABINE,JANET L
1
52695
06/14/96
CHLEBECK,JUDY M
1
52696
06/14/96
DAHL,HELENE M
544.75
52697
06/14/96
DARST,JAMES
1
52698
06/14/96
FREBERG,RONALD L
1
52699
06/14/96
HELEY,RONALD J
1
52700
06/14/96
LUTZ,DAVID P
1
52701
06/14/96
MEYER,GERALD W
1
D
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
6
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
DATE
-- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------ -
AMOUNT
-
52702
06/14/96
- - - --
NAGEL,BRYAN
------------ - - - --
1
52703
06/14/96
RUNNING,ROBERT
984.71
52704
06/14/96
WESTERHAUS,BRIAN J
540.00
52705
06/14/96
WOESSNER,SHAWN P
504.00
52706
06/14/96
ELIAS,JAMES G
1
52707
06/14/96
LINDBLOM,RANDAL
1
52708
06/14/96
PRIEBE,WILLIAM
1
52709
06/14/96
BRENNER,LOIS J
697.11
52710
06/14/96
KRUMMEL,BARBARA A
641.35
52711
06/14/96
ANDERSON,ROBERT S
1
52712
06/14/96
HANSON,SHANE T
517.50
52713
06/14/96
HELEY,ROLAND B
1
52714
06/14/96
HINNENKAMP,GARY
1
52715
06/14/96
LAVAQUE,MICHAEL
1
52716
06/14/96
LINDORFF,DENNIS P
1 1 379.03
52717
06/14/96
OLSON,KRISTIN P
280900
52718
06/14/96
SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES
1 1 349.11
52719
06/14/96
SPICER,MARK R
448.00
52720
06/14/96
WEGWERTH,JEROME A
588.00
.52721
06/14/96
GUNN,NANCIE L
20.63
52722
06/14/96
HORSNELL,JUDITH A
677.11
52723
06/14/96
HUTCHINSON,ANN E
1,578971
52724
06/14/96
NELSON,JEAN
841.12
52725
06/14/96
SOUTTER,CHRISTINE
277.06
6
8
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
DATE
--- -. - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------ -
AMOUNT
52726
06/14/96
- - - -- ---------------
MISKELL,NANCY
- --
540.02
52727
06/14/96
WEGWERTH,JUDITH A
1
52728
06/14/96
ERICSON,JAMES
98000
52729
06/14/96
ANDERSON,EVERETT
1
52730
06/14/96
CARVER,NICHOLAS N
1
52731
06/14/96
OSTROM,MARJORIE
1
52732
06/14/96
WENGER, ROBERT J
1
52733
06/14/96
CHASE,TANIA
112950
52734
06/14/96
FERRAZZO,STEPHANIE
166.08
52735
06/14/96
FINN,GREGORY S
1
52736
06/14/96
FRANK,PETER J
383.01
52737
06/14/96
HILSGEN,NATALIE
109950
52738
06/14/96
LOMBARDI,JAMES D
250.51
52739
06/14/96
NESS,CHERI MARIE
117.00
52740
06/14/96
PETERSON,TRACY L
378.00
52741
06/14/96
PRIEFER,BRIAN W
45950
52742
06/14/96
RAHN,CARY
329.90
52743
06/14/96
RENSTROM,MARK D
175.00
52744
06/14/96
RYAN,KELLY
208.00
52745
06/14/96
SAGER,LEAH M
33.00
52746
06/14/96
SCHUBERG,ROBERT S.
115.50
52747
06/14/96
STIEN,MARY
307.91
52748
06/14/96
BREHEIM,ROGER W
1
52749
06/14/96
EDSON,DAVID B
1
8
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD.
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
E
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE.NAME
AMOUNT
52750
06/14/96
GERMAIN,DAVID
1
52751
06/14/96
NADEAU,EDWARD A
1
52752
06/14/96
NORDQUIST,RICHARD
973.65
52753
06/14/96
THOMAS- JR,STEVEN
1
52754
06/14/96
ATKINS,KATHERINE
530.26
52755
06/14/96
COONS,MELISSA
716.86
52756
06/14/96
COURTEAU,BARBARA
160.88
52757
06/14/96
EDWARDS,MARY P
4 10.71
52758
06/14/96
ESTEVEZ,DIANE
119000
52759
06/14/96
GLASS,JEAN
547.76
52760
06/14/96
GRAF,MICHAEL
711.18
52761
06/14/96
HOIUM,SHEILA
492.53
52762
06/14/96
KELLY,LISA
612.78
52763
06/14/96
MEINKE,JENNY
40.50
52764
06/14/96
PETERSON,KAYLENE
767.18
52765
06/14/96
PETERSON,RICHARD
351921
52766
06/14/96
SOLUM,PETER B
79.63
52767
06/14/96
BADEN,MATHIAS
305.68
52768
06/14/96
BECKER,VALERIE M
394.25
52769
06/14/96
BRAIER,GAIL E
121.50
52770
06/14/96
CHAPMAN,JENNY A
126.00
52771
06/14/96
CONLIN,PAMELA
85.50
52772
06/14/96
CORNER,AMY L
15.00
52773
06/14/96
DAMIANI,ROBERT
48950
E
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
10
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
DATE
-- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------ -
AMOUNT
52774
06/14/96
- - - -- ------------
EGGEN,ERIC J
- - - - --
78.75
52775
06/14/96
GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C
40950
52776
06/14/96
HAWKINS, LISA A
45.00
52777
06/14/96
HOULE,DENISE L
72.00
52778
06/14/96
IKHAML,JOHN
279.36
52779
06/14/96
ILLI,SARAH
78.00
52780
06/14/96
ISERMAN,MICHAEL L
221965
52781
06/14/96
JOHNSON,ROBERT P
142.50
52782
06/14/96
KAUFMAN,GINA
421.10
52783
06/14/96
KLETT,ANNA
115.81
52784
06/14/96
KOEHNEN,MARY B
333900
52785
06/14/96
KOEPKE,JENNIFER M.
171.00
52786
06/14/96
KRAEMER,JILL
598.10
52787
06/14/96
KULLANDER,CHRISTINE
185.25
52788
06/14/96
LINDQUIST,MATHIEU P
264.00
52789
06/14/96
LIVINGSTON,KELLY
305.01
52790
06/14/96
LUHRS,BETHANY L
186.00
52791
06/14/96
MAGNUSON,BETH M
15.00
52792
06/14/96
MAJKOZAK,MICHELLE
72.00
52793
06/14/96
MARUSKA,ERICA
130.20
52794
06/14/96
NORTHQUEST,JONEEN L
92.00
52795
06/14/96
OWEN,JONATHAN
43.50
52796
06/14/96
POWERS,JESSICA
317.20
52797
06/14/96
ROAN,CARIN K
208.93
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
52798
06/14/96
SCHLUETER,LOUISE E
30900
52799
06/14/96
SCHMIDT,RUSSELL
295.63
52800
06/14/96
SCHNEIDER,CHRISTINA L
156900
52801
06/14/96
SELIN,JONATHAN
256.90
52802
06/14/96
SIMONSON,JUSTIN M
107.50
52803
06/14/96
SIVERSON,OLAF L
117.00
52804
06/14/96
SMITLEY,SHARON L
76950
52805
06/14/96
SWANER,JESSICA
175900
52806
06/14/96
THIBODEAU,KELLY M
607.00
52807
06/14/96
WARNER,CAROLYN
94050
52808
06/14/96
WEDES,CARYL H
72.00
52809
06/14/96
WESTBERG,JENNIFER
69975
52810
06/14/96
WESTBERG,MELINDA
211.50
52811
06/14/96
BOSLEY,CAROL
170.44
52812
06/14/96
CHRISTENSEN,JODIE
383.25
52813
06/14/96
DULL,KELLIE
59.50
52814
06/14/96
FERRIERE,SONYA L
197.50
52815
06/14/96
FRANK,LAURA
84.00
52816
06/14/96
JACOBSON,REBECCA L
90000
52817
06/14/96
JOHNSON,ARIEL
50.63
52818
06/14/96
MCDONOUGH,DARLA
20925
52819
06/14/96
MCDILL,LAYL M
67.50
52820
06/14/96
OLEARY,VIRGINIA
240944
52821
06/14/96
RENSLOW,RITA
113.06
TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS 272,998.49
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
12
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
DATE
-- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
52822
06/14/96
- - - - -- ---------------
SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN
- --
199.50
52823
06/14/96
SPANGLER,EDNA E
91000
52824
06/14/96
ANDERSON,MICHELE
147.38
52825
06/14/96
AUER,DANIEL
416.31
52826
06/14/96
BAILEY,DEANNA L
152.25
52827
06/14/96
BRINKMAN,JOE J
170.00
52828
06/14/96
CHRISTENSEN,JANET
375.64
52829
06/14/96
ERSFELD,ALICE L
95.80
52830
06/14/96
JAHN,DAVID J
1
52831
06/14/96
JAQUES,THOMAS
125.78
52832
06/14/96
KELLY,CASEY
88.70
52833
06/14/96
MILLS,DEREK
148.60
52834
06/14/96
SCHLINGMAN,PAUL
1
52835
06/14/96
SEEGER,GERALD F
246.11
52836
06/14/96
SWANSON,LYLE
1
52837
06/14/96
SWANSON,VERONICA
627.36
52838
06/14/96
THOMAS,TINA M
21.00
52839
06/14/96
MULVANEY,DENNIS M
1
52840
06/14/96
SPREIGL,GEORGE C
1
TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS 272,998.49
Faw;t
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
Final Plat
PROJECT:
Highwood Fifth Addition
LOCATION:
O'Day Street, north of Schaller Drive
DATE:
June 12, 1996
INTRODUCTION
dorsed
11od -.fie
Rej ected. _.
Date
Gonyea Company is requesting that the city council approve the Highwood Fifth Addition final
.plat. This final plat would create two lots, one for a house and one for city park use. The plat is
on O'Day Street, north of Schaller Drive. (See the maps on pages 2 and 3 and the proposed final
plat on page 4.)
BACKGROUND
On March 11, 1996, the city council approved a street vacation and the preliminary plat. This
approval was subject to two conditions. (See the minutes starting on page 6.)
DISCUSSION
Gonyea Company has met all the conditions that the council required to approve the final plat.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Highwood Fifth Addition final plat subject to the county recording the deed
transferring Lot 1, Block 1 of the Highwood Fifth Addition to the city.
p:13- 28/hig h5fin. mem
Attachments:
1 Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Proposed Final Plat
4. Approved Preliminary Plat
5. 3 -11 -96 Council Minutes
: Att' . *%hl"fit
1
LOCATION MAP
2
m
4
N
s ' � 4 ' p"oAY
POND \�
MARY W. G
�
8 U KEG
IVD
O' DAY �
co
S g 7 A�
►.wuwD
��
cl .. A
woo* � N �
y y
C)
T a � �
WOOD � g E^'c o oft. �
3
cc
cc � U4CR�OGE 0�2.
CT. g W
c�
16
3
HILLW000 Z
z
w
1. HUNTINGTON CT.
2. W�KRIDGE LA-
68 ° 2 ' DR.
c 1.
O
Mr�t, �� Rrp�E
25
Q ���
a: � Re
oR. hC� o f
<( > g
AVE.
os
Lil�'W000
a te, AVE. UN'W0pD �1+
�•
O
J
OU
cr cc
TIM9E
17
CT
Z
TIM B � gE
LER DR.
W
eHYus CT. g DR, 1
U
1. CURRIE CT,
2. VALLEY VIEW CT.
ygLLEy ¢ vALL
VIEW. 3 � a-
VIEW
3. LAKEWOOD CT.
AV 2 �
1 En HiGttw00D
AVE. 74
N �
AVE. �
� �
z5
A
� � ME�+rrz AVE AvE - z
° u
A
z o � �
NEM
---
3: � OAK HEi kfT W � SOUTH -
x cc CREST AVE.
72
CT.
INOREIAND
CT. N CT. 4,
f A,*,o
SH
C rver
Q
SC OR
N
� Crook
P„
Loke
v
BOXWOOD Av.
S
CARVER
AVE.
43
OVERLOOK (t
LOCATION MAP
2
m
4
N
At a chm n
.bl to eo 155.01
�(24) FUTURE
9 o -L • CITY PARK
1 �
w a
(23) H
N O
� 00
� - rj M8E R CO uR
S`
. .............. +'.
O-
'�.
• fl
i.
..
O
L
. . .........::
. H o , � 1 Y ......:::::::: u 563 9 WIN
PIZ IN
K N . :.... 555 , 25 71
C D
2 5 8 7
857 O ::: . t _ . 3) 4 9
' q' , '13 93 -
r p', � � 2539
C34) P , — m 865' �` ,,,� �16.1� Q 4 90
° � � M. + � 253 , _• �' 14 2580 �.
�� i r 12, (� N i ��(►Q ,� 1 ,, b0 - 8 4 2 �.: �'3
` ; 7 z 877 N o y�� `'a '� r' (d�) lay 3
841 �` l ,
O s �
r5� -
• — 9 w1 10 c 850 7L
P . \1 0 Z3
,,hh
O V' tiOr � q ` 2528 ° �t 44. t3 i3 73 73
33.57 ��� �A, G W
�,A 25201 .� o zz �4� y
Z ``' � C � �) b �5
2512 D � •.� ° s < ,� 1 /
R
e CON
450 cn 't O c o 4 9 0....
�
L 0 T E 32) 6 s ° r , a 11 -`�6. 9 / 5 "� �4a� a q .6.
X92 � 4 ,� s
jp
- <40 1 O O t � �.9 � 4 s. r4 84 ao
145 75 70 64.42c g' �q F ' 1 ,Z 3 4
v tjy.y 2Za —
. +n
5 195.57 H UD 7 g 8,, 9 ,.
�.
2 1 ( ) � . c i `�� � ; 1 12) `i 3 (r4 � 5� � »
(
''
vALLEYV I EW Avg"
g , : VALLEY V t EW AV E.
2
1 1
p =b4 t 1, 7 �e ,• , - 13Z 0 9� I4c
90 01D 3 8S $p 115 0 o �' o r3� a o o �-S, o Vi z)
b� o a ap ° �1 J , z0 J 54 ., S5 3 o (?W .
� 'r �t2 �� h �4 �� 4, 5� 6; 7 10
to ...� 8e. .�3 -�. ? 9 61 " 1
(24 (?..5,� � 2 ) �2 ( i73.3� 4v, 6 - :. X3. 401
+
� 9 /69.64 0 ( +2-f "; _
1.02 ac. �
Q` x '140 . Q ( 'ES o p T o r.93u 13 12
ki-li O !�
� gg 110 P:
l04 r Q � O N Q
N • ft)
57s►c - a&—,
% L O 120` 80 14 100
2.i!� tlo9.I2 JJD 130 ` ,
HIGHWOOD AVENUE
V
&;t I i - . --' —.
169. • 143.0''
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
. .. ........
SITE 3 N
Attachment 3
N
0 30 60 90
SCALE IN FEET
SCALE: 1 INCH 30 FEET
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE NORTH
LINE OF HIGHWOOD THIRD ADDITION HAS AN ASSUMED
BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEGREES So MINUTES
24 SECONDS EAST
• DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND
AND MARKED VATH REGISTRATION NUMBER 6743.
• DENOTES 1/2 BNCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET
AND MAWCED VATH REGSTRATION NUMBER 20282.
HIGHWOOD FIFTH ADDITION
I - I -F-
SONG 5.00 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE
INDICATED. AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AND BEING
KLOO FEET IN WIDTH. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AS SHOWN ON
ON THIS PLAT.
HY -LAN' SURVEYING, P.
PROPERTY LOCATED IN PART. OF THE NORTH HALF LAND SURVE
OF SECTION 13. TOWNSHIP 28. RANGE 22.
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
PROPOSED FINAL PLAT
Q
N
2
N 89 ° 59'24 " E
NORTH UK OF HIGHWOOD THIRD ADDITION - 613.25
wI --
60.00 - - - - _ _ �. 352.30 - - - - - - - - - - - - --
-
;• 1 /
vACF;i �r----+------------------------------ - - - - -- - - - - -- ��
w i
.. a 3s•sS'2I• 7�
..'qAY SP. �:X'�. s2r48 '29'W ��.'
16.95 ' �o 0
O
Ri110.0� OC. NO.
1 L�68 9 \
C. BM- S24 - *
O'DAY ST.
uiioitr 44 13N t p.ld'28't7 < �
1
`
37 i ,'�i
L -14. \
1
`
r / I
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN
NOT TO SCALE
THUS:
1
t t V o
l ip--
M 1
s
1
a
; 10
I - I -F-
SONG 5.00 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE
INDICATED. AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AND BEING
KLOO FEET IN WIDTH. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AS SHOWN ON
ON THIS PLAT.
HY -LAN' SURVEYING, P.
PROPERTY LOCATED IN PART. OF THE NORTH HALF LAND SURVE
OF SECTION 13. TOWNSHIP 28. RANGE 22.
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
PROPOSED FINAL PLAT
Q
N
2
Attachment 4
STREET RELOCATION PLAN
H 5TH ADDI
0 30 60 90
SCALE: I INCH - 30 FEET CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY ,���.0 ��� 352-30 ...........
....... ......... N 89• 59 24' E. * " "•r,
260-95
% 0 00
01 L OCK % % � 1�]
b
Xy
.000, . ......
44
13 w
23 1
55
ool tol
(o /� 4
:�;. ::: � �.tottt.ol ,i 2
.0-e
1
10 000^1
1_01
+ be
womom woo, s %/iWALIE
of A so % 36
tlria�trw =16 • omm a" moveh"m talt Oil 12
*"voter flow"
77i
9845
ftes"Is
folist age&$ "'s" s re"
At" 4" Lou
11" +11 - 29,1111"
1610 a - Mall o"a" ft"
AU "@too@" op ok*$G" FEB 2 19
oftL"O's 111. SIGN*= TWM &111111111113
sm
mor"an ukask 11" ow"wly *a the ~%mly
"m 09 um ow"wl li" oil a" 3.
su" I's � "Im mwum.
I b"my ""Ift asit tie sput was p
a m es uman M "sees "m gam a" swt
I as *'ftlr 111"soww" wal Ift""m -"w 00
low N It" Oft" ot
ftt" tus uk o of owime It".
am. "ON" 31. It".
os gdte — — .
uw ► Salb. N tlAaa flsN hoss"m "wma ties
no IT " um "~&I 0"00"m of k"
Attachment 5
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
' 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 11, 1996
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 96 -05
3. 7:30 P.M. (9:0 P.M.) Highwood 5th Addition (O'Day Street)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the .meeting for a public hearing regarding a
proposal.to develop Highwood Fifth Addition, consisting of one lot for .
a house on a 1,11-acre site on the north end of O'Day Street, north of
Schaller Drive.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Commissioner Gary Pearson presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Joe Yankovich, 857 O'Day Street
Liz Creager, 2539 Schaller Drive
Sam Bernstein, 2531 Schaller Drive
Kevin Berglund, 1929 Kingston
f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
Street Vacation
g. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adOD
tion•
96.03.33
STREET VACATION
WHEREAS. Mr. Dennis Gonyea applied for the vacation of the following-
described street right-of-way:
That part of O'Day Street north and east of an easterly continuation
of the North 1 i ne of Lot 3, Block 1, Highwood Third Addition in
Section 13, Township 28, Range 22
6
r
s
MINUTES OF 14APLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, March 11, 1996
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 96 -05
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. On February 20, 1996, the Planning Commission recommended that
the City Council approve this vacation.
2. On March 11, 1996, the City Council held a public hearing. The
City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent
a notice to the abutting property owners. The - Council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written
statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the
property will go to the following abutting properties:
Outlots A and B of Highwood Third Addition
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described vacations for the following reasons:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City and the developer have no plans to build a street north
of this site.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes all
Preliminary Plat
h. Councilmember Carlson
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF TO INVESTIGATE 1HE "SIZE OF THE CUL- DE -SK ON O'DAY
STREET.
1, Change the street relocation plan to show the cul-de-sac right-
of-way on the final plat.
2. Deed Lot 2 to the City and record this deed with the final plat.
f-3
Aotion o..un0jL1 m
MEMORANDUM Endorsed
11041 `ied..,.... .
Rejected. ,
TO: City Manager ante
FROM: James Ericson, Planning Intern
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review
PROJECT: The Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Phase 111)
LOCATION: 1791 -1809 Gervais Avenue (between Rainbow Foods and Carefree Cottages)
DATE: June 7, 1996
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit (CUP) for Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Phase III) is due for
review. The CUP is for a planned unit development (PUD). City code requires a CUP for the
project because the city zoned the site LBC (limited business commercial). This zoning district
limits uses to offices and day care. However, the city may approve a CUP for a PUD in any
zoning district. Refer to the maps on pages 3-4 and the site plan on page 5.
BACKGROUND
On June 12, 1995 the city council made several approvals for the Carefree Cottages of
Maplewood (Phase 111). These included (1) a CUP for a PUD, (2) a land use plan change from
LBC to RH and OS, (3) a vacation for an excess drainage easement, (4) a parking reduction
authorization, (5) a sideyard setback variance and (6) the design approval. The CUP approval
was subject to 14 conditions. Refer to the minutes starting on page 6.
CUP DURATION
Section 36- 455(a) states that all CUPs shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the
date of the initial approval, unless such review is waived by the council decision or ordinance. At
the one -year review, the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term not to exceed five
(5) .years.
DISCUSSION
The developer is progressing with the project and hopes to have the first one -half of the
apartment building (the Chateau) ready for occupancy by July 1, 1996. They would continue to
work on the rest of the site during the summer and hope to have the whole project done by
September.
Some site grading and earth work, however, has gotten into the wetlands on the site.
Specifically, the grading and filling got into part of the wetland east of the apartment building
(behind Rainbow Foods). The grading also got into a small part of the wetland on the northwest
corner of the apartment building. City staff and Ramsey/Washington Watershed District staff
have been working with the developer on preparing a mitigation and replacement plan for the
wetland and buffer areas that the grading affected. Once the developer finishes this plan and it
is acceptable to the staffs, we will submit it to the council for review and approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit (CUP) for the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Phase III) on
or before September 9, 1996. The council shall do this review after the city staff receives a
wetland replacement/mtigation plan for the project.
PA ... 1sec11 \carecot5.rev
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line / Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. City Council Minutes, June 12,1995
2
Attac 1
8� AVE.
►u►PLE v►Ew AVE.
p RADAR � � AVE.
0
3 � � YFSS�BI AV 4b .. . s 4b 0
J 1i101'k�fOT ��5�, W
W � � NORTH
cou
' P � rJnr � '••. L6 . � � couRr Co
AVE. � � � rn � KOHLWW o"y
Z w W Loki o AVE t
Pot
W � O
El .w• v
MILL
DEMONT
BROOKS � W •..•
AVE. �n � � • a•
BROOKS
AVE CL EY)vTM _: moo
f^
SEX TANT
A
77 7oo
VE.
..
� CERvAuS
� ' CERY/ GER'vN5 AVE.
s GR/WCNEIM AVE. W CT. .
VIKING OR Y c Ate' a - I
SMERREN AVE. U$TLE AVE.
E: --- K � J od Lake A� COPE AVE. 006
� of
AVE D rn LARK AVE. � ir
LAURIE o � �R E R0.
uwooww LAURIE R0. �si.rw+I p lJ1URlE ° R0. W v
z ox
SSW uRST &
Z P4 �
CO. R0. � I B � � r
25
elMetcE AvE o � BuRKE I►vE. 6S '�''�'' v � Ow
p.pFt K= A„¢, � J&%" Ohm
IMONT AVE
E,Anp� J .
LL WW AVE. WIRRIS AVE �' � ••'
ROSEWOOD AVE N. g • • �
R/1►tSE1' C + •'
Ak
A M1 AV. �Q� � AVE 5 O �F� GROUNDS
0 0
cc 0
AVE COODRCt+
LOCATION MAP
3
4
N
Attachment
C�� r .` L S A
!1st ac. (•���� {M� t � . •v if'1} ( 0' • Q• o . , i ewe • • •.. e
10
1
vst K (4 loc.ar s , -o --
I ; . +t t � , ``., •r 3.13&
1 4 / #3 I ' •
(34) s tt �K� 1 1 x ` 44 &c. c ` ,
ai ae eft•19 (110) • s L ! J
v .c .
(• si•) e� 2547 / « AND •- .M ' 2 • - ' a**'
u •
N:
'S lag) .1 2542 . Of
f4+)
� v
!at •c ` •� i 4j) 253 s er4.72w
E253
WETLAND
MAPLE RIDGE MALL
emu. f52 2526 f t
o _ .,• •.• If0.01 i0 a f as
1ii,t9' � 7.sZ !M R t�.r' •i s `fie I
f su�.L� ' ' Ii7'�'•t '• 1
S 1 ;
O.L. A 0 os: "419K3 `� ; 1 Tit *t s fi8, I
C-") BITTERSWEET ��-: ••� :.�
ESTATES `� 1 1* = I
14
13 ONENESS a db oof
LID) 9411 Ao
.s
i 2 RAINBOW FOODS s
ire #�, Q� H'
ITE 1 � 4 robe .►R
•
r ` v ■f ■ ■ ■ ■�■ ■ice
rev � 10 O *Tlf 3 i� ' .
Ott) y y ■ ■
Z
P 9 . « ` o �, S s 71i 4.e W
33 " — �/ t�
MR) CAREFREE COTTAGES JP� J Co I
LLI
W .
M
o
B C
r V ,
Elm
� r (si Lsiou.
2425 '
3 (le) to W C1� r
Q P N o 1733 , a 401 2 (19) ; \,O .f
L L 1
Ito-
• . n>L �s ... /- -
■ 4K �; G ft, - �ERVAIS COURT
oft , .. 1 2.0 - l3sti �tS ;R opow" rj
�il.if' i 31 if 1770 •'• • •' j •�,r
..,6 .c 1.60 ac I; 1800 �81 s ■�
1730; �.``� 1790 ■ 1890 ♦ .
1700 ! 1 Z y w W .t.�iry � � •
f; Q� _ 4� �:.n� �► NW BELL ♦ �, �.
all 0
left
n
x t,, 0 a
N (Vro� t� 11
V A i E" ,�
3 TOPPER ? �� 0 a � al
C ) ;.. `
OFFICE WAREHOUSE WOR J �� .�, ♦ ��'
..�
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
4
4 .
N
Attachment • 3
r,
C
3
F •,
r
V�
1
Z
;
V
1
_
COUNTY OPEN SPACE
POND
r '
V
a
♦ 0
V
W�
u.
W
APARTMENT - 92 COVERED
fLA7p �
R4N ;
\ Q
PM
n9N /
• l
2� 3
E
2 2
� 2
2 WETLAND c
7 M 1.1 tvi 11 1,11..
2
• V
% �b �Y.LS PRGPME
• v~
19' i� �"` i vry �•- to
air a7.4� P—
STAUS b' 10 GRACES in. ---
S M. d1RAGE3 J /'
FIRE
RW
3 3 RETENTM ° - E'
POND �F. _ Eby.be:
J
APARTMENT BUILDING
i 58 2- BEDROOMS
16 3- BEDROOMS
3 3 36 1- BEDROOMS
3 3 110 UNITS
COTTAGE VILLAS
12 2-BEDROOMS
20 3- BEDROOMS
0 1- BEDRO
32 UNITS
V �.
•h. TOTAL PROJECT
70 2- BEDROOMS
36 3- BEDROOMS
✓ 36 1- BEDROOMS
142 UNITS TOTAL
PARKING
COTTAGES - 12 OPEN
COTTAGES - 32 COVERED
APARTMENT - 58 OPEN
SITE PLAN 05124/95
r: •
CAREFREE COTTAGES OF
MAPLEWOOD - PHASE III
AGE ° 'c= - - ` - MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Lot 5, Block 1, Maple Ridge Mall and the south 989.64 feet of Lot 1,
E.G. Roger's Gorden Lots except the westerly 280.00 feet thereof.
s
am .
ao
am
am
I101
am
TOTAL STALLS OPEN - 70
TOTAL STALLS COVERED - 124
001 Mf X W&M 5wf, 5fM 200
(60251 -W W602"M
SITE PLAN
5
f
0
Attachment 4
9, July Council /Manager Workshop
' Rescheduled the July 31. 1995 Council /Manager meeting to Monday, July 17,
1995 from 5:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M.
go
10 7:0 P.M.: Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Phase III)(Gervais Avenue)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting . for a public hearing regarding a
proposal by Gerald and Bruce Mogren (representing Carefree Cottages of
Maplewood III) to build 142 units of senior housing on the north side of
Gervais Avenue between Rainbow Foods and the existing Carefree Cottages
of Maplewood.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Commissioner Milo Thompson presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Boardmember Mary Erickson presented the Community Design Review Board report.
f. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing. calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Harlan Hess, 2472 Flandrau
Art Wilde, 2465 Flandrau
Justin Mailman, 2400 Flandrau
Bruce Mogren, the developer
Patty Mogren, resident manager of Carefree Cottages
Mary Bifulk, Carefree Cottages resident
Clarence Roth, Carefree Cottages resident
Joe Zappa, 2522 Flandrau
g. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
Lard Use Plan Change (LBC to RH)
h. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its
ldg p tion:
95 06 � 72
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE - LBC TO RH AID OS -CAREFREE COTTAGES PHASE I I I
WHEREAS, Gerald and Bruce Mogren applied for a change to the City's land use plan
from LBC (limited business commercial) to RH (residential high density) and OS (open
space) .
WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property located on the north
side of Gervais Avenue between Rainbow Foods and Carefree Cottages of Maplewood
(Phases I and II).
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
6
6 -12 -9r
1. On May 15, 1995. the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The City
staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent
notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written
statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve the p
2. On June 12, 1995, the City Council discussed the land use plan changes.
They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission
and City staff.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described
changes for the following reasons:
16 This site is proper for and consistent with the City's policies for..
high•density residential use. This includes:
a. Expanding the transitional land use between low
residential and commercial land uses.
b. It is next to a collector street and is .near two churches .
shopping, an arterial street and Four Seasons Park,
2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding
properties because:
a. The existing ponds and wetland areas will separate the senior
housing from nearby homes.
b. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property
values.
c. There would be no traffic from this development' on existing
residential streets.
3. The City had planned this site for RH land use from 1.973 - 1983.
4, In 1983, the City gave concept approval to a senior housing project on
this site.
Seconded by Counciimember Koppen - Ayes all
Conditional Use Permit
i . Councilmember Rossbach i *+t r ^�� ��� the fol l owi na Resolution and moved its
a,dggtion:
95 -06.73
COND ONAL USE PERMIT - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT •CAREFREE COTTAGES PHASE III
WHEREAS, Gerald and Bruce Mogren applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for
the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Phase III) planned unit development (PUD),
W this permit applies to the undevelo property on the north side of
Gervais Avenue between Rainbow Foods and the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Phases
I and II). The legal description is:
6 -12 -9"
Lot 5. Block 1, Maple Ridge Mall and the South 989.64 feet
of Lot 1, E. G. Roger's Garden Lots except the Westerly 260
feet thereof in Section 11, Township 29. Range 22.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On May 15. 1995 the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve this permit.
2. On June 12, 1995. the City Council held a public hearing. The City
staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing
a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning
Commissions
NdW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-described
conditional use permit, because:
10, The use would be located. designed, maintained, constructed and operated
to be in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and Code of
ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the
surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or
methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental,
disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of
excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust. odor, fumes, water or air
pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness,
electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets
and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or
proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services,
including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not excessive additional costs for public
facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's
natural and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1.
All construction shall follow the site plan dated May 24. 1495. except
that all buildings, including garages shall be at least ten feet apart.
The City Council may approve mayor changes. The Director of Community
Development may approve minor changes.
8 6 -12 -9,E,
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year
of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend
this deadline for one year.
30 The owner shall not convert this development to non - seniors housing
without the revision of the planned unit development. For this permit,
the City defines seniors housing as a residence occupied by persons that .
are 62 years of age or older.
4e* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and Engineering plans.
These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control .
tree and driveway and parking lot plans. The plans shall meet the
following conditions:
a. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with City Code.
b. The grading plan shall include proposed building pad elevation
and contour information for each building site.
c. The tree plan shall show:
13 Where the developer or contractor will remove, save or
replace large trees.
2> The site, species and location of any trees that the
developer will plant as replacement trees.
3) All trees that the developer will plant shall be at
least 2 1/2 inches in diameter.
There shall be no tree removal past the approved grading and
tree limits.
d,, All the parking areas and driveways shall have continuous
concrete curb and gutter except where the City Engineer decides
that it is not needed for drainage purposes.
5. The design of the NURP pond shall be subject to the approval of the City
Engineer. The developer shall give the City an easement for this pond
and shall be responsible for getting any needed off -site pond and
drainage easements.
6. The design of the propane storage area and its access shall be subject
to the approval of the Fire Marshal.
7. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or
trailers.
8,0 Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not geed for
day -to -day transportation on site. If the City decides there are excess
parking spaces available on site, then the City may allow the parking of
these on site.
9. If the City Council decides there is not enough on -site parking after
the buildings are 95 percent occupied, the City may require additional
parking.
9
6 -12 -9r
10. The developer or contractor shall:
a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the ,pond, ,
complete all public improvements and meet all City requirements.
b,o *Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading
limits.
c. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer
easements. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and
shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting,
filling or dumping.
d Install survey monuments along the wetland boundary.
e. Remove any debris. dunk or fill from the wetlands and site.
il. The developer shall provide an on•site storm shelter in the apartment
building. This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the Director
of Emergency Preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square feet
per person for 80% of the planned population.
12. *The developer shall give the City wetland easements over the wetlands.
The easements shall cover the wetlands and any land within twenty feet,
surrounding a wetland. These easements shall prohibit any building,
mowing, cutting, filling or d umping within twenty feet of the wetland or
within the wetland itself. The purpose of this easement is to protect
the water quality of the wetlands from fertilizer and to protect the
wetland habitat from residential encroachment.
13. *The .developer shall give the City a market study. This study must
document that there will be enough demand from seniors (62 or older) to
keep this a senior housing project. The City must approve this study.
14: The City Council shall review this permit in one year,
*Th eve oper must, complete these conditions before the City issues a
grading permit or building permit.
Seconded -by Councilmember Koppen Ayes all
Parking Reduction Authorization
�. Councilmember Rossbach
1) The parking space requirement is not proper for senior housing
because there are fewer cars per unit in these projects; and
2) The City has approved fewer parking spaces for other senior
housing, including the Village on Woodlynn and the Carefree
Cottages to the west of this site.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen 10 ayes all
6 -12 -9r
Vacations
k. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its
it adoption:
95.06.74
EXCESS DRAINAGE EASEMENT VACATION - CAREFREE COTTAGES PHASE III
WHEREAS, Gerald and Bruce Mogren applied for the vacation of the following-
described easements and right-of-way:
1. The drainage easement over the Northeasterly 320 feet of Lot 5, Block 1.
- Maple Ridge Ma11, Ramsey County Minnesota as dedicated on said plat.
20 All that part of the storm water ponding easement recorded as document
number 1021793 (Torrens) over Lot 5. Bl ock 1. Maple Ridge Me11, Ramsey
County. Minnesota, said easement described as follows:
A drainage easement over and across those parts of Lot 1, E. G, Roger's
Garden Lots and Lot 5. Block 1. Maple Ridge Mall described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89
degrees, 24 minutes. 04 seconds West (assumed bearing) along the
North line of said Lot 1 a distance of 145.7 feet; thence south 34
degrees 54 minutes 34 seconds West 150.11; thence south 36 degrees
46 minutes 38 seconds East 234.05 feet; thence north 80 degrees 14
minutes 52 seconds east 596.61 feet to a point on the southwesterly
line of existing drainage easement on said Lot 5; thence north 27
degrees 45 minutes 48 seconds west along said Southwesterly line of
said drainage easement 235 feet to the North line of said Lot 5;
thence north 69 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds west along said North
line of Lot 5 and its westerly extension 387.05 feet to the point of
beginning.
3. That part of Dertiont Avenue measuring 33 feet by 33 feet in the northwest
corner of Lot 5. Block 1, Maple Ridge Mall, Ramsey County, Minnesota as
dedicated on said plat.
WHEREAS, the history of these vacations are as follows:
1. On May 15, 1995, the Planning COMM'Ission recommended that the City
Council approve these vacations.
2, On June 12. 1995, the City Council held a public hearing,, The City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the
abutting property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a
chance to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning
Commission,
WHEREAS, after the City approves these vacations, public interest in the property
will go to the following abutting properties:
Lot 5 Bl ock 1, Maple Ridge Mall and the South 989.b4 feet of Lot 1,
E. G. Roger's' Garden Lots except the Westerly 280 feet thereof in
Section 11, Township 29, Range 22.
11
6 -12 -9c,
NOW, THEREFORE." BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-described
vacations for the following reasons:
S, It is in the public interest.
2. The existing easement is larger than the City needs.
3. The developer will dedicate other easements for wetlands and drainage
purposes.
These vacations shall be subject to the developer dedicating new drainage
and wetland easements to the City. The City shall not release this
resolution until the developer has prepared the easement documents for
recording.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen ayes • all
Side Yard Setback Variance
1. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its
ado .
95 a 06 • 75
SIDEYARD SETBACK YAFtIAHCE • CAREFREE COTTAGES PHASE III
WHEREAS. Gerald and Bruce Mogren applied for a variance from the zoning
ordinance.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to the undeveloped property on the north side of
Gervais Avenue between Rainbow Foods and the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood .(Phases
I and II). The legal description is:
Lot 5, Block 1. Maple Ridge Mall and the South 989.64 feet of Lot 1, E. G.
Roger's Garden Lots except the Westerly 280 feet thereof in Section 11,
Township 29, Range 22.
WHEREAS, Section 35.28(c) (6)(b) of the Maplewood Code of Or*4dinances requires the
proposed buildings to have a 504foot setback from the west property line.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 10•foot setback for detached garages a28-
foot setback for attached garages and a 20•foot setback for the apartment building.
WHEREAS, this requires variances of 40 feet. 22 feet, and 30 feet respectively.
WHEREAS. the history of this variance is as follows:
1, On May 15, 1495, the Planning Commission recormiended that the City
Council approve this variance.
29 On June 12. 1995. the City Council held a public h The City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone'at the hearing an
opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning
Commission.
12
6-12-9p,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-described
variance for the following reasons:
1. It would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance for the following
reasons:.
a. The smaller setback would not affect the existing senior housing
to the west. The nearest living unit would be 30 feet from the
proposed buildings.
b The closer setback would not affect the adjacent propesties on
the west side of the site since the proposed buildings are
similar to the existing buildings in style and use.
c. If the property line was not between phases of the development.
the buildings could be 20 feet apart.
2. Strict enforcement of the Code would cause undue hardship. The developer
cannot move the buildings further east and still, the City's parking and
access needs.
3. The variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen byes all
Design Approval
m. Councilmember Rossbac-h nLov,
TO I l
1. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a
building permit for this project.
2. .Complete the following before the City issues a building permit:
a. Have the City Engineer approve final construction and
Engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading,
utility, drainage, erosion control, tree and driveway
and parking lot plans. The plans shall meet the
following conditions:
1) The erosion control plan shall be consistent
with City Code.
2) The grading plan shall include proposed
building pad elevation and contour information
for each building site.
3) The tree plan shall show:
a) Where the developer or contractor will
remove, save or replace large trees.
b) The size, species and location of any
trees that the developer will plant as
replacement trees.
c) Al 1 trees that the develof/424 er will plant
shall be at least 2 inches in
diameter.
• There shall be no tree removal past the
approved grading and tree limits.
13 6 -12 -95
4) All the parking areas and driveways shall have
continuous concrete curb and gutter except
where the City Engineer decides that it is not
needed for drainage purposes.
5) The design of the NURP pond shall be subject to
the approval of the City Engineer. The
developer shall give the City an easement for
this pond and shall be responsible for getting
any needed off•site pond and drainage
easements.
b. Record with Ramsey County all drainage and wetland
easements required by the City. The wetland easements
shall cover the wetlands and any land within twenty feet
surrounding a wetland. These easements shall prohibit
any building, mowing, cutting, filling or d ing within
twenty feet of the wetland or within the wetland itself.
The purpose of this easement is to protect the water
quality of the wetlands from fertilizer and to protect
the wetland habitat from residential encroachment. City
staff shall approve these easements before the developer
records them.
C. Submit a certificate of survey for all new construction.
d. Revise the landscape plan for City staff approval
showing:
1) Drop the vegetation around the proposed propane
storage area. The Fire Marshal shall approve
this part of the plan.
2) The driveway between the east end of the
cottages and the storm water pond.
3) The planting of native evergreens on the site
to replace some of the proposed Black Hills
Spruce. These should include eastern red cedar
and eastern arborvitae. These should be on the
north side of the propane storage area and on
the north and west sides of the storm water
r nd.
4) anting (instead of sodding) the disturbed
areas on the west, north and east sides of the
apartment building with native grasses and
native flowering plants. The native grasses and
flowering plants shall be those need little or
no maintenance. This is to reduce maintenance
costs, strengthen the wetland buffer and to
reduce the temptation of mowers to encroach
into the wetland buffer.
5) The planting of native grasses and flowering
plants around the proposed storm water pond. This type of planting shall .extend at least
four feet from the ordinary high water mark
(OHWM) of the pond.
6) The repair and redefinition of the east edge of
the existing pond that is west of the proposed
apartment building. The edge of the pond shall
be reshaped and planted with sedges, rushes and
C8tL8i15.
14
6-12-91F
I ' e. Verify that the apartment building height and all unit
sizes meet City Code standards*
3. Complete the following before occupying the buildings:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this
construction.
b Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
c. Install reflectorized stop signs at the Gervais Avenue
exits, a handicap- parking sign for each handicap-parking
space and addresses on each building,, In addition, the
applicant shall install stop signs and traffic
directional signs within the site, as required by staff.
d. Screen all roof•mounted equipment visible from streets
or adjacent property. as Code requires.
e. Construct trash dumpster and recycling enclosures as
City Code requires. The enclosures must match the color
of the buildings.
f. Taper the existing sidewalk along Gervais Avenue to
match the driveway grades.
g. .Install an in-ground sprinkler system for all landscaped
areas.
h. Install continuous concrete curb and gutter along all
interior driveways and around all open parking stalls.
i. Install a storm shelter in a central location in the
apartment building. This shelter shall be subject to the
approval of the Maplewood Director of Emergency
Preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square
feet per person for 80X of the planned population.
J. Install on -site lighting for security and visibility,
subject to City staff approval.
k. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland
.buffer easements, These signs shall mark the edge of the
easements and shall state there shall be no mowing,
vegetation cutting, filling or dumping beyond this
point.
1. Install survey monuments along the boundaries of the
wetlands.
4. If any required work is not done. the City may allow temporary
0
occupancy if.*
a. The City decides that the work is not essential to the
public health, safety or welfare.
b The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter
of credit for the required work. The amount shall be
150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
15 b -12 -9E,
c. The City receives an agreement that will allow the City
to complete any unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of
Community Development may approve minor changes.
69 The applicant shall resubmit the building design changes for the
apartment and apartment garages to the Community Design Review
Board for approval.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen ayes al I
n. Mayor Bastian moved,to guest Staff to Dreoare a_re
c,m ;�rison of T F us s with other communities and statewide .
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson ayes •all
2. 7:20 P.M.(8:32 P.M.) Crestview Forest Townhouses (Mailand Road and Sterling Street)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a
staff proposed change to a preliminary plat condition for the Crestview
Forest Townhouses. The proposed change is relative to the trail to
Vista Hills Park.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Director of Parks & Recreation Anderson supplied additional information
regarding the proposal.
e. Commissioner Thompson presented the Planning Commission report.
f. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing,, calling for proponents or
opponents. No one appeared.
g. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
Plat Condition Change
h. Councilmember Carlson moved to aRprov
5) Provide for the dedication of a 20-foot easement from
Sterling Street to the west property line. The City shall
build the trail on Outlot A of the Beth Heights Addition and
on an easement on the southwest corner of the' Crestview
Forest 2nd Addition, The City and the townhouse association
shall stake the exact trail location in the field. The
townhouse association shall give the City any required
easements for this trail.
C) Send correspondence to developer to collect for cost of
trail.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen ayes - all
16 6.12 -95
f e
-L.,kw OFFICES
_BRJC4C,S 2,ND MO ROAN
) =,R0F'ESSJ 0 N.i%,:L ASSOCIATION
FIRST NATIONAL
SAINT V.&OL, M1NT4BS0'TA C15101
if) Sacj - C-3000
TEL-BIJ140NE (b -,
. FACSIX1 JL'W 181rdho Z:::4-L3460
-WRITILWS D1 D1A'L:K(TN1BY_U
Tune 17, 1996
(612) 223-6625
VIA MESSENGER
Mr- Dan Faust
Finance Director
Cit of Maplewood
1830 East Count Road B
Maple-wood, MN 55109
Mr- Richard McNamara
Cit of Oakdale
1584 Hadle Avenue North
.Oakdale, MN 55128
raw Y
il 's :
Action by COUnc) *'
F ,ndorsed—__--��
Modif 16
Rej eete
11* 01v'F1C-?-
f,,4.c)o ins CZ14TAR
MINIMAJOC11-19,
TZLEMEY149149M
P,kc-sihn" (612) 334 b(160
Re-- J oint lee Arena - Resolutions Re b the Joint Powers A
Dear Rich and Dan:
joint Tower A AL
r1be g reement re that the parties approve the j oint ice
arena and its financin on or before Jul 1 and that the find, based on the,
anal provided b Sprin that the facilit g ross revenues and other
available mone are sufficient to repa the bonds without reliance on a propert
tax lev In addition, the Joint Powers A re that Maplewood and
Oakdale issue g eneral obli bonds to the School District to evidence their
obli to pa one-third of the debt service on the bonds if the gross revenues
of the e facilit are i nsufficient.
am deliverin to each of y ou a cop of the resolution. The form of bond,
which ill'be an exhibit,
is not attached. I will put five copies of the resolutions,
- w
the form of bond and the Sprin Report to you in the mail tomorrow.
,� ' ::; ,_�;;:_ l ; ' a fi I `�I, fi t' f t . ; ' 1 i :i f NOW) �t 5 W 0 4
N V,) �t OW I
Y Z 10 C'f is-I 0 R Cy
MT. Dan Faust
M r. Richard McNamara
Taue 17, 1996
Pa Two
If y ou would like an from our office or Sprin to attend the
m eetin g , please le t me know in advance of - the meetin After adoption of the
resolution, please return two executed copies to me.
Ver trul y ours,
Mar
MMD:mw
Enc.
cc: Mr- John Maas
Mr. Thomas Deans
T 111 : `4 i.:'+ ►.� l.� I "I W0
(NON) NVIlY 0�
LAW OFFICES
BRIGGS A-WD MORGAN
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK 13UILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
TELEPI-IONE (612) 223-6000
FACSIMILE (412) 223-6450
MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE
June 18 1996 2400 IDS CENTER
WSITEI3�S DISECT DIAL NUMBER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE (612) 334-8400
FACSIMILE (812) 334 -8650
(612) 223 -6625
Mr. Dan Faust
Finance Director
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Mr. Richard McNamara
City of Oakdale
1584 Hadley Avenue North
Oakdale, MN 55128
Re: Joint Ice Arena - Resolutions Required by the Joint Powers Agreement
Gentlemen:
Enclosed is the complete copy of the resolution with the form of bond
attached as an exhibit and the Springsted Report.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Very truly yo,�urs,
Mary M.'\Dyrseth
MMD:mw
Enc.
n
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
MINNESOTA
HELD: June 24, 1996
Pursuant to due call and thereof a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota,
was duly held at the City Hall in the City on the 24th day of
June, 1996, at o'clock P.M. f or the purpose in part of
making certain findings in connection with a joint ice arena.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINANCING OF A JOINT
ICE ARENA, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS
WITH RESPECT THERETO AND AUTHORIZING
THE ISSUANCE OF A GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
TO EVIDENCE OBLIGATIONS UNDER A
- - JOI-NT-PoW-ER-&-AGREEMENT - - - - -
A. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood (the "City "),
Independent School District Number 622 (North St. Paul- Oakdale-
Maplewood), Minnesota (the "District ") and the City of Oakdale
( "Oakdale ") have heretofore entered into a Joint Powers Agree-
ment, as amended, effective as of January 1, 1996 ( collectively,
the "Joint Powers Agreement "), pursuant to which they established
a Joint Powers Board to construct, operate and maintain an indoor
ice arena intended to be used predominantly for youth athletic
activities (the "Joint Ice Arena ");
B. WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement provides that
the District will issue its general obligation bonds in the
principal amount not to exceed $1,950,000 (the "Bonds ") to
finance the construction of the Project and that if the Pledged
Revenues (as defined in the Joint Powers Agreement) are
insufficient to pay debt service on the Bonds the City and
Oakdale will each pay the District one third of the deficiency;
C. WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement provides that
the City's and Oakdale's obligation to pay any deficiency shall
323673.1
be evidenced by a general obligation bond issued and delivered to
the District;
D. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the City, the
District and Oakdale are required to approve the Joint Ice Arena
and its financing and find, based on analysis provided by
Springsted Incorporated, a professional organization experienced
In finance, that the gross revenues of the Joint Ice Arena and
other available money will be sufficient to repay the Bonds,
without reliance on a property tax levy or general purpose state
aid;
E. WHEREAS, a report on the feasibility of the
Project originally dated September 15, 1995, as amended and
supplemented by revised schedules dated April 16, 1996, has been
prepared by Springsted Incorporated, a professional organization
experienced in finance ( the "Springsted Report ") ; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Authorization; Findings The City Council hereby
finds, based on the analysis provided in the Springsted Report,
that the gross revenues of the Joint Ice Arena and other
available money will be sufficient to repay the Bonds, without
reliance on a property tax levy or general purpose state aid
within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.58,
Subdivision 3. paragraph ( a) (3) .
2. Approval of Project The City Council hereby
approves the Joint Ice Arena and the issuance of the Bonds to
finance the Joint Ice Arena.
3. Issuance of City Bond The City Council hereby
authorizes the issuance of the general obligation bond (the "City
Bond ") in the principal amount of $650,000 in substantially the
form attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Mayor and the Clerk are
hereby authorized and directed to execute the City Bond and
deliver it to the District prior to the issuance of the Bonds.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member and, after full
discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted.
323673.1 2
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY O F RAMS EY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting
Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes
with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same
is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a
meeting of the City Council of said City of Maplewood, duly
called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such
minutes relate to making certain findings in connection with a
Joint Ice Arena.
WITNESS my hand this day of
1996.
Clerk
323673.1 3
EXHIBIT A
$650,000 General Obligation
Recreational Facility Bond, Series 1996
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that the City of
Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, ( the "City") certifies that
it is indebted and for value received promises to a to
to p ay
Independent School District Number 622 (North St. Paul- Oakdale-
Maplewood) a sum equal to 33 1/3 of the annual principal and
interest requirements of the $1,950,000 General Obligation
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1996A (the "Bonds ") , as the
same shall become due if and t the extent that the primary
source of payment pledged to the payment thereof is insufficient
therefor.
This Bond constitutes a general obligation of the City and
to provide moneys for the prompt and full payment of said
principal and interest requirements of the Bonds when the same
become due if and to the extent needed, the full faith, credit
and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby
irrevocably pledged.
IN. WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, by the
City Council has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by
the signatures of the Mayor and the City Clerk, all as of
1996.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Mayor
City Clerk
324009.1
Report for the
Indoor Ice Arena Project
,September 15, 1995
Cities of Oakdale and Maplewood, Minnesota
and
Independent School District 622
(North St. Paul Maplewood — Oakdale, Minnesota)
Prepared by:
Springsted Incorporated
85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -2143
Minneapolis Office:
120 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402 -1800
(612) 333 -9177
Home Office:
85 East Seventh Place
Suite 100
St. Paul, MN 55101 -2143
(612) 223 -3000
Iowa Office:
2070 Melrose Avenue
Iowa City, IA 52246
(319) 351 -5855
Wisconsin Office: Washington Office: Kansas Office:
16655 West Bluemound Road 1850 K Street NW 6800 College Boulevard
Suite 290 Suite 215 Suite 600
Brookfield, WI 53005 -5935 Washington, D.C. 20006 Overland Park, KS 66211 -1533
(414) 782 -8222 (202) 466 -3344 (913) 345 -8062
Table of Contents
Paa es
Introduction and Purpose ............................. ............................... 0..............
Demographics........................... ............................... ...............................
ProjectRevenues ....................................................... ............................... 1 -3
ProjectExpenses ........................ ............................... .............................. 3 -5
Financing.................................................................... ............................... 5 -8
OtherConsiderations .................................................. ............................... 9
Indoor Ice Arena Project -- - -----
. . . ............ . .... ..... . . ......... ...... .......
Introduction and .Purpose
The Cities of Oakdale and Maplewood and ISD 622 have under consideration the construction
and shared use of an indoor ice arena. Springsted has been asked to review the operating
proforma for the proposed arena and compare it to information available for other arenas
elsewhere in the metro area. In preparing this report we reviewed budgetary information for
arenas and research from previously prepared feasibility reports. We did not attempt to verify
the information gathered.
The objective of this report is to comply with the statutory requirements of Minnesota law
(M.S. 475.58 as amended) for the financing of ice facilities.
Demographics
The population base of the area to be served has grown over the last 25 years. The following
table indicates population levels for the two Cities and the enrollment for the School District that
will be direct participants in development of the facility:
Entity
1970
1 80
1990
1995*
City of Oakdale
7
12,123
18,323
22,162
City of Maplewood
25,186
26,990
30,954
32,394 (1993)
North St. Paul- Maplewood S/D N/A N/A 8 11,650
(figures shown are enrollment figures)
Estimates made by the Metropolitan Council for the two Cities and by the School District.
Population alone is not the only determinant of success of a facility, but the population growth in
the area suggests that the base of potential users is growing. Due to the heavy use of similar
facilities by youth hockey programs, it is important to note that the District enrollment figures
show expansion of this portion of the population is also occurring.
The on -going expansion of athletic opportunities for school age girls has caused increasing
demands for ice time to support girls' hockey and Ice Ringette programs. This increased
demand has resulted in much interest in development of new facilities to accommodate the
need. The recently passed "Mighty Ducks" legislation, which is intended to reduce capital
borrowing costs, is one indication. We are aware of a number of communities that are also
initiating plans to develop ice arenas, but cannot comment on the impact of these proposed
developments on the market for the facility suggested for ISD 622.
Project Revenues
The primary revenue of an ice arena is the sale of prime time rental hours. These hours range
from after school lets out (2:30 -3:00 P.M.) to about 11:00 P.M. during weekdays and all day
and evening on weekends. The following Table 1 illustrates rental hours and projects a
potential total of 1,742 hours for a 26 -week schedule. The table is taken from a report
commissioned by the Tartan Area Youth Hockey Association (TAYHA) titled, "Proposed
Facilities Upgrading Report and Feasibility Study," and was developed by Arena Consulting and
Construction, Inc. in 1994. A similar but expanded study by Marquette Partners on behalf of
B SPRINGSTED Page 1
Indoor Ice Arena Project
Table 1
THE 6 AND 6 ARENA OPERATION
Prime Ice Hours
The table shows what is considered "prime time" rental hours. The early evening
hours from the time school dismisses until 5:10 P.M. could most likely be used by the high
schools.
Starting Times:
Monday through Thursday: 2:50 P.M.
4:00 P.M.
5:10 P.M.
6:20 P.M.
7:30 P.M.
8:40 P.M.
9:50 P.M.
Total 28 Hours
Friday: 2 :50 P.M.
4:00 P.M.
5:10 P.M.
6:20 P.M.
7:30 P.M.
8:40 P.M.
9:50 P.M.
11:00 P.M.
Total 8 Hours
Saturday: 6:00 A.M.
7:10 A.M.
8:20 A.M.
9:30 A.M.
10:40 A.M.
11::50 A.M.
1:00 P.M.
2:10 P.M.
3:20 P.M.
4:30 P.M.
5:40 P.M.
6:50 P.M.
8:00 P.M.
9:10 P.M.
10:20 P.M.
11:30 P.M.
Total 16 Hours
Sunday Drop 11:30 P.M. hour
Total 15 Hours
Total Hours per Week 67 Hours
Total Hours per Year (67 Hrs. X 26 Wks.) 1,742 Hours
Page 2 SPRINGSTED
Indoor Ice Arena Project
Inver Grove Heights in 1992 suggests that common usage fora 26 -week period is 1,400 hours.
If the arena is operated year -round the available time doubles, but usage doesn't necessarily
follow and rates are usually discounted from rental rates during the hockey season. Use of the
facility for dry floor activities may increase the revenue potential if ice is not maintained year-
round; however, operating costs would also increase and whether there is a net gain in revenue
must be examined closely. The City's proforma indicates a prime time usage of 1,600 hours.
This level is within the range of available hours.
Information provided by the Minnesota Ice Arena Managers Association indicates that rental
rates ranged from $70 /hour to $110 /hour (excluding Mariucci at a rate of $120 /hour) with an
average rate of $98 (See - Table 2). Newer rinks tend to charge at the higher. levels; older rinks
of the lower levels. The Marquette Partners report indicated that for those facilities for which
financial data was available, total ice rental income ranged from $109,000 to $196,000 per
sheet of ice.
The revenue figures being used for the proposed project are based on a rental rate of $100 and
rely on a projected usage of 1,200 prime time hours with 100 open skating hours. The School
District is expected to use an additional 300 hours of the available prime time hours. The
resultant ice rental income is $130,000 annually from prime time. It is unclear whether the
school or other potential users (such as community based programs) would operate non -prime
time programs during the school day although the potential exists.
We have been informed that the TAYHA has agreed to provide a total of $500,000 taking two
forms first, an upfront financing of construction costs of $250,000; and secondly, an annual
payment for subsidizing operations of $50,000 payable at the end of each operating period for a
five -year term. This income has been factored into the proforma by assuming that the
contributions will defray the cost of debt service during those years.
Other revenue sources from similar arenas include non -prime time rentals (such as day
programs for school or community), admission fees to major events, dry floor events during the
off- season if ice is removed, advertising, concession and vending machine income, skate
sharpening fees, and other miscellaneous rental and sales. However, the major factor in
revenue generation remains the effective scheduling and aggressive marketing of ice rental
time. City of Oakdale personnel have indicated that the expectation is the facility will not be
used as a spectator facility and, therefore, admission fees should not be a significant revenue
factor. Additionally, dry floor events are not expected. Modest amounts of income can be
expected from sharpening fees, concession and vending machine activities. The real potential
of advertising income is unclear to us at this time.
Project Expenses
Expense categories for arena operation are fairly straightforward and include the following:
Salaries: Includes rink management, maintenance and other personnel needed.
Payroll Taxes and Benefits: Taxes, insurance and retirement benefits, etc.
Repairs and Maintenance: Includes building, equipment and grounds maintenance.
Professional Services: Includes allocations for legal and accounting services.
Utilities: Includes electric, gas, sewer, water, waste and telephone charges.
Insurance: Includes cost of property and liability insurance for the arena.
Administration and Supplies: Includes promotion expense, printing, dues and
memberships, travel and office supplies.
Zamboni Expense: The cost for fuel and parts for ice resurfacing equipment.
Concession Merchandise: Includes the costs of goods sold.
2 SPRINGSTED Page 3
Indoor Ice Arena Project
Table 2
MIAMA
MEMBERSHIP SURVEY INFORMATION
1994 -95
Roller Skate/
Operate
Manager
Assistant
Ice
Rates
Roller Hockey
Concessions
Vendin
Salary
Aldrich Ice Arena
$100.00
$50 /hour
CCP
$40,000
$35,672
Apple Valley Sports Arena
110.00
other
CCP
40,000
30,000
Blake School
105.00
school
CCP
35,300
24,600
Bloomington Ice Garden
109.00
other
own
43,000
40,000
Brooklyn Park
Community Center
105.00
self
CCP
45,000
25,000
Burnsville Ice Center
110.00
other
own
49,100
36,000
Columbia Arena
95.00
self
CCw
43,200
32,180
Cottage Grove Ice Arena
104.00
$2 /session
own
44
37
Eden Prairie
Community Center
102.50
C --
40,000
35,000
Farmington Arena
100.00
other
CCP
31,262
26,250
Graham Arena
105.00
$25 /hour
other
-CP
38,000
Hastings Civic Arena
92.50
self
C -P
38,563
19,716
Hopkins Pavilion
95.00
$50 /hour
other
C -P
39,000
15,200
J. Cook Arena
90.00
other
own
44,500
34,200
Mariucci Arena
120.00
other
-CP
35,200
Minnehaha Ice Center
75.00
other
$11 /hour
$10 /hour
Minnetonka Arena
90.00
self
C--
30
National. Hockey Center
95.00
self
C --
32,000
27,000
New Hope Arena
105.00
self
own
55,307
31,595
Northfield Arena
90.00
self
34,360
Princeton Arena
95.00
other
-CP
29,000
Ramsey County Arenas (9)
90.00
$45 /hour
C --
50,725
40,560
Richfield Ice Arena
105.00
self
CCP
Rochester Arenas
100.00
other
C--
54
27,700
Roseville Ice Arena
110.00
self
own
45
St. Louis Park Rec. Center
90.00
self
C -P
47,698
34
Veteran's Memorial Arena
70.00
self
C -P
21,000
Wayzata Arena
90.00
other
not in
budget
12
White Bear Sports Center
95.00
self
-CP
Candy, coffee, pop.
Page 4 PA SPRINGSTED
Indoor Ice Arena Project
As yo.0 can see from the list, most of the expenses associated with arena operation are fixed,
not variable. Changes in the level of usage while the facility is open will have little effect on the
total expenses incurred.
We have looked at a number of budget statements for area arenas. It is difficult, however, to
make direct comparisons due to the variations in sizes of arenas, type of operation, staffing
complements, etc. Table 3 sets out current budget information for two arenas, an operating
proforma for a third arena, and financial information from the Marquette Partners report for two
additional arenas. Personnel expenses are a major expense component and will vary from
arena to arena based on the operations and the potential to share responsibilities within other
City/sponsor functions. It has been assumed that the new arena will be managed by the
current manager of the Polar facility. For purposes of the expense assumptions illustrated on
Table 4, it is assumed that the arena is staffed full -time, with additional personnel available for
maintenance and general operations. Sala levels have been based on levels similar to those
provided by M IAMA, and the .manager's cost is included as if each arena managed will support
half of the manager's salary.
Additional expense categories have been estimated using the Table 3 information as a guide.
Actual expenses of the facility will undoubtedly vary from those shown here and no assurance
is given that the amounts shown represent maximum exposures for operation of the facility.
Financing
The financing assumes that bonds are issued which carry a general obligation backing. Table 5
uses the estimated construction cost to derive the bond issue size required. The financing
assumes that the bonds are issued in February 1996 and that construction begins in March.
The project is complete in October and open for public use in November. Interest is capitalized
during construction and into the initial start -up phase of operations. Interest earned on
construction funds prior to expenditure are retained in the construction account and applied to
the project.
The amount of money needed to retire the bonds over a twenty -year period is shown under
"Average Annual Amortization" for each of three scenarios. Average Annual Amortizations are
provided for the first year of operation, years 2 through 5, and years 6 and beyond. The first
column illustrates a scenario where no grant money is received. The second assumes
$125,000 is received and the third assumes the full $250,000 is received. The Table 4
proforma has assumed the second debt service scenario, makes no assumptions concerning
inflation related to revenues and expenses, and results in a contribution towards operations of
$18,530 for each of the three participants in years 2 through 5, and $36,273 in year 6 and
thereafter.
The financial information presented here is based on estimates and assumptions based on
generally available data applicable to market experience in August 1995. The intent of this
report is to provide information to the participating jurisdictions, as well as to address the
requirements found in MS 475.58, as amended regarding youth ice facilities. This report is not
intended to be a rigorous feasibility study for disclosure purposes associated with the issuance
of municipal bonds. Some assumptions inevitably will not materialize and unanticipated events
and circumstances may occur causing actual results to vary. As the project takes on more
definition, it may be useful to revisit these assumptions and perform a sensitivity analysis to test
the impact of variations in certain key assumptions regarding operation and financing.
� SPRINGSTED Page 5
Indoor Ice Arena Project
Table 3
Revenues
Intere Earnings
Ice Rental:
Prime Time
Non -Prime Time
Other Rentals
Admissions
Dry Floor Events
Advertising
Concessions
Vending Machines
Skate Sharpening
Rental and Miscellaneous
Total Revenues
Expenses
Salaries:
Park and Recreation
Director
Rental Coordinator
Manager
Accountant
Overtime
Building Attendant
Skate Guard
Payroll Taxes /Benefits
Polar
Repair and Maintenance
Marquette
Professional Services
Report
Utilities
��1
Insurance
$ 600
Administration and Supplies
Zamboni
95,000
Concession Merchandise
24, 500
Dry Floor Events
Other:
19,500
General Fund
$ 81
Administration, Sales
__.5700
Total Expenses $179,600
6,000 2
$211,845 $208,339
Revenues Net of Expenses $ 64,500 $ (50,045) $ (5
Farmington
Polar
Marquette
Marquette
Report
Report
X19911
��1
$109,000 $196,000
16,000 6
4,000
5,.000
18.000
$152,000
10,000
3, 000
$215,000
$ 68 ,000
12,000
15
1 000
34,000
6,000
26
$129,000
15,000
12,000
1,000
38,000
2,000
41,000
$163,000
0
$238,000
$(11 $ (23, 000)
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Rosemount
Hastings
Eagan
1995
1995
1995 Citl
Budget
Budget
Proforn
$ 600
$ 4
169,200
95,000
$186,000
24, 500
20,300
19,500
$ 81
2
5
13,100
14, 810
23
5
21
4
10,400
2
47,000
1
7
4
0
9.800
3,,600
$244
$161,800
$202,600
$ 7,100
5
23,100
10,100
400
30,750
4.150
$ 81
$ 95
$101
5, 800
14, 810
23
12,000
17,699
11,550
58,600
45,980
47,000
10,000
10,350
8
3,400
9
12,500
2, 800
2
1
10,200
Page 6 2 SPRINGSTED
Indoor Ice Arena Project
- ----- - - ---- - ------ MOWN-- ---1 --- --- --------- -- -- - -----------------
Table 4
JOINT ENTITY ICE ARENA
First Year
Years 2 - 5
Years 6 +
REVENUE:
Interest Earnings
Ice Rental
Prime Time
$130,000
$130
$130
Non -prime Time
--
--
--
Other Rentals
--
--
--
Admissions
--
--
--
Dry Floor Events
--
--
--
Advertising
--
--
--
Concessions
5
5
5,000
Vending Machines
5
5
5
Skate Sharpening
1
.1
1
Rental and Miscellaneous
--
--
--
Total Revenues
$141,000
$141
$141,000
Less: Debt Service
(34,079)*
(99,090)
(
Available Revenues
$106
$41,910
$38
EXPENSES:
Salaries
$ 60,000
$ 60 7 000
$ 60
Payroll Taxes /Benefits
9
9
9
Repair and Maintenance
15,000
15,000
15
Professional Services
1
1
1
Utilities
45,000
45,000
45,000
Insurance
10,000
10,000
10
Administration and Supplies
5
5
5
Zamboni
2
2
2
Concession Merchandise
--
Dry Floor Events
--
Other— General Fund
Administration, Sales Tax
--
--
--
Total Expenses
$147
$147,500
$147,500
TO BE PROVIDED BY
THREE SPONSORS
$(40,579)
$(105,590)
$(108
TAYHA OPERATION SUBSIDY
x .0,000
50,000
0
NET SURPLUS
(SUPPORT REQUIRED) **
$ 9
$(55,590)
$(108
ESTIMATED INDIVIDUAL
ANNUAL SPONSOR SHARE
$ 18,530
36,273
* Net Debt Service after application of first year capitalized interest.
** Does not include replacement requirements.
2 SPRINGSTED Page 7
Indoor Ice Arena Project
Table 5
PROJECTED REQUIRED BOND ISSUE SIZES
Construction Costs
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
Less: Hockey Association Contingency
(250,00.0)
(250,000)
(250,000)
Grant Received
(0 )
(125._400)
(250 000)
Net Construction Costs to Fund
$11
$1
$1
Costs of Financing
20
2.0
20,000
Underwriting Discount
19
17
15,900
Capitalized Interest.
58,000
52,000
50
Less: Project Interest Earnings
32,.725)
(29,775)
_. (25 )
Bond Issue Size
$1,315,000
$1,185,00.0
$1,060,000
AVERAGE ANNUAL AMORTIZATION
First Year*
$94,521
$ 85,179
$ 76
Years 2 through 5
108
99
87,476
Years 6+
113
102
91,840
Assumed Bond Rate
5.75%
5.75%
5.75%
Amortization Term
20
20
20
* 11/1/1996 interest payment covered by capitalized interest
Page 8 SPRINGSTED
Indoor Ice Arena Project
Other Considerations
Additional consideration should be given to two items regarding major equipment acquisition
and a major maintenance reserve. It is our understanding the constructi budget provides for
building construction only with no financing for major equipment. We are unsure of the
financing source for the ice resurfacing equipment.
These types of facilities receive hard use over long periods of time, which result in equipment
and building maintenance problems. Breakdowns in the ice- making and ice - resurfacing
equipment lead to both loss of revenues and repair bills often in the $10,000's. The
establishment of appropriately sized maintenance reserves at the time of beginning operations
or a contractual remedy providing immediate funding by the three parties is recommended.
� SPRINGSTED Page 9
Cities of Oakdale and Maplewood
and Independent School district 622, Minnesota
Projected Ice Arena Operations
Revised Option
(2 Sheets, $115/Hr., With Advertising Revenue)
First Year
Years 2 - 5
Years 6 +
REVENUES (1):
Ice Rental - Sheet #1 (1,300 hours) (2)
$89,700
$149,500
$149,500
Ice Rental - Sheet #2 (1,100 hours)
75
126,500
126,500
Advertising
12
20
20,000
Admissions
-
-
-
Dry Floor Events
-
-
-
Concessions (Net of Expenses)
6
10
10,000
Vending Machines
4
7,500
7,500
Skate Sharpening
3
5
5
Rentals
-
-
-
Other
-
-
-
Total Revenues
$1 91,100
$318,500
$318,500
Bond Debt Service (3)
0
(16_5,052 )
(165,052)
Available Revenues
$191,100
$153,448
$153,448
EXPENSES (1):
Salaries *
$75,000
$90,000
$90,000
Payroll Taxes/Benefits
11,250
13,500
13
Repair & Maintenance - Building
12,500
15
15,000
Repair & Maintenance - Machinery & Equipment
4,167
5,000
5
Utilities
62,500
75,000
75,000
Insurance
12,500
15,000
15,000
Supplies
8
10,000
10
Professional Services
1,250
1
1
Other
-
-
-
Total Expenses
$187, 500
$225,000
$225,000
Available Revenues Over (Under) Expenses
$3,600
($71,552)
($71
TAYHA Operation Subsidy
50,000
50,000
0
Replacement/Reserve (4)
0
0
0
NET SURPLUS (SHORTFALL)
$53,600
_.J$21,552)
($71, 552)
ESTIMATED ANNUAL SPONSOR SHARE
$0
$7,184
$23,851
(1) Assumes facility is operational in mid - November of 1996 and first year revenues will be 60% of norm
Expenses assumed to be 80% of normal (5 months).
(2) Does not include 300 hours of ice time given to ISO 622.
(3) Debt service payments are due on November 1 and May 1.
Since operating revenues are generated in October through April, the November 1 debt service
I . payment must be made primarily with funds from the prior operating year.
First year debt service payments (11/1/96 and 5/1/97) will be paid from capitalized interest.
(4) No allowance has been, made at this time for replacement and/or reserve funds; however, budget
considerations should include set asides for repair and replacement.
* Received from City following discussion with School District.
Prepared by: SPRINGSTED, Inc. (04/16196) F :\USERSIKAA\OAKDALE1PR00409.WK4
AGENDA REPORT
Action by C oune i 1
To: City Manager Michael McGuire
from: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins & E ndorse
Subject. Safe & Sober 96 Grant Resolution Modifie
Date: June 17, 1996
Rejecte
Date
Introduction
it. i's proposed that the City Council approve the attached resolution
authorizin g the Maplewood Police Department to receive and expend a community-
oriented policing grant of $41,725.54 from the Minnesota Department of Public
Safety.
Background
On May 17, 1996, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety invited the
Maplewood Police Department to submit grant applications pursuant to the
Minnesota Act of 1996. The deadline for application was June 14, 1996.
The Crime Prevention Act requires that, prior to the receipt or
expenditure of funds, the applicant. must provide a resolution from its
applicable governing body authorizing the execution of the grant agreement.
On June 13, 1996, the Maplewood Police Department submitted a grant proposal
under the Act to hire one new police officer to be,assigned exclusively to
neighborhood -level community - oriented policing.
The receipt of the requested grant constitutes the first -year salary for this
officer.
The proposed resolution satisfies the requirement for future release of funds
,to the Police Department. In addition, it authorizes the Chief of Police to
represent the department in the preparation of fiscal documents, reports, and
audits..
Recommendation
It is recommended that the proposed resolution, authorizing the department to
obtain the grant funds, be approved.
Action Required-
Submit to the City Council for their review and approval.
KVC:js
Attachment
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Public Safet under the Minnesota Omnibus Crime
Prevention Act of 1996, has called for g rant proposals from law enforcement a for funds to
implement communit policin pro and,
WHEREAS, the Cit of Maplewood is activel committed to the implementation of nei
level communit policin efforts-, and,
Y4-1EREAS, the abilit of the Department to implement these initiatives is directl affected b the
availabilit of such funds and,
WHEREAS, a prere for municipalities to receive such g rant funds is the existence of a
resolution authorizin the police department to enter into an a with the Department of
Public Safet for this purpose
NOW FORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Maplewood Police Department is authorized
to enter into a g rant a with the Minnesota Department of Public Safet to obtain funds for
the emplo of one full-time nei communit policin officer durin the period
from October 1, 1996, throu September 30, 1997 and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Kenneth Collins, Chief of Maplewood Police, is hereb
authorized to execute such subsidiar a as are necessar to implement the project on
behalf of the Maplewood Police Department.
SIGNED.* WITNESSETH.
(Si
Ma
(Title)
(Si
Cit Clerk
(Title)
(Date) (Date)
WHEREUPON the above resolution was adopted at a re meetin of
the cit council this 25th da of September, 1995.
Authorized signature and title
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
11 ..r.....,..,. 0---- . . , do hereb certif that I am the custodian of
the minutes of all proceedin had and held b the
of said that I have compared the above resolution with the
ori passed and adopted b the of said
at a meetin thereof held on the
da of at that the
above constitutes a true and correct cop thereof, that the same has not been amended
or rescinded and is in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto placed m hand and si this
and have hereunto affixed the seal of the
Date
( SEAL ) Authorized si and title
s
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council
To City Manager Michael McGuire
From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Coll ins` p Endorsed
Subject : Safe & Sober 96 Grant Resolution Modified_,..,._
Date: June 17, 1996
ReJected
Date
Introduction
It is ro osed that the City Council authorize the Maplewood Police Department
p p
to receive and expend a community- oriented policing grant of $46,000 from the
Minnesota Department of Public Safety.
Background
.On May 17, 1996, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety invited the
Maplewood Police Department to submit grant applications pursuant to the
Minnesota Act of 1996. The deadline for application was June 14, 19960
The Omnibus Crime Prevention Act requires that, prior to the receipt or
ex enditure of funds, the applicant must provide a resolution from its
p
applicable governing body authorizing the execution of the grant agreement.
On June 13, 1996, the Maplewood Police Department submitted a grant proposal
under the Act to provide $46,000 in overtime pay for officers assigned to
Operation CLIPPER (Community -Level Interaction Program).
Operation CLIPPER would use these overtime funds to increase police presence
in the 13 neighborhoods in the City of Maplewood, to foster neighborhood -based
police- citizen interaction, and to increase citizen involvement in crime
prevention.
The proposed resolution satisfies the requirement for future release of funds
to the Police Department. In addition, it authorizes the Chief of Police to
re p resent the department in the preparation of fiscal documents, reports, and
audits.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the proposed resolution, authorizing the department to
obtain the grant funds, be approved.
Action Required
Submit to the City Council for their review and approval.
KVC:js
Attachment
R ESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
VnJEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Public Safet under the Minnesota Omnibus Crime
Prevention Act of 1996, has called for g rant proposals from law enforcement a for funds to
implement communit policin pro and,,
V4EREAS, the Cit of Maplewood is activel committed to the implementation of nei
level communit policin efforts-, and,
WBEREAS, the abilit of the Department to implement these initiatives is directl affected b the
availabilit of such funds and,
WHEREAS, a prere for municipalities to receive such g rant funds is the existence of a
resolution authorizin the police department to enter into an a with the Department of
Public Safet for this purpose
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,, that the Maplewood Police Department is authorized
to enter into a g rant a with the Minnesota Department of Public Safet to obtain funds for
the reimbursement of police officer overtime expended on Operation CLIPPER durin the period
from October 1, 1996, throu September 30, 1997 and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,, that Kenneth Collins Chief of Maplewood Police, is hereb
authorized to execute such subsidiar a as are necessar to implement the project on
behalf of the Maplewood Police Department.
SIGNED: WITNESSETH, 0
(Si
Ma
(Title)
(Date)
(Si
Cit Clerk
(Title)
(Date)
WHEREUPON the above resolution was adopted at a re meetin of
the cit council this 25th da of September, 1995.
Authorized si and title
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
do hereby certify that I am the custodian of
the minutes of all proceedings had and held by the
of said , that I have compared the above resolution with the
original passed and adopted by the _ -- of said
at a meeting thereof held on the
day of at , that the
above constitutes a true and correct copy thereof, that the same has not been amended
or rescinded and is in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto placed my hand and signature this
and have hereunto affixed the seal of the
Date
(SEAL) Authorized signature and title
AGENDA ITEM G��
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council:
Endorsed
,TO: Cit Manager Modif ied.---
Re
FROM: Cit En Date
SUBJECT: Centur Avenue North of Hi Sanitar Sewer, Project 95-11
Public Hearin
DATE: June 17, 1996
The 'Cit council previousl received the feasibilit stud for this pro An
information , al meetin was conducted last month b Wood bur I ewood staff. In
addition, Maplewood has scheduled time just prior to the public hearin for staff to meet
with propert owners and answer q uestions. The proposed assessments and financin
are attached as information for this hearin If the cit council decides to g o ahead with
this pro it does re and 4/5 vote adoptin the attached resolutions.
KG
j c
Attachment
FINANCING PROPOSAL FOR DISCUSSION
Single Family Assessment
to
Per Uni
Sanitary sewer lateral
$2,625
Water lateral
2
Street
11125
Services
1
Water connection charge
520
Sanitary sewer connection charge
255
Subtotal unit assessment
$8,195
Financing
Single family assessment (28 units) $229,460
State aid street (65% of street cost) 102
Undeveloped property (55 acres) area
assessment ($2,500 /acre) 137.460
Total project cost $469,120
June 17, 1996
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearin on the construction of sanitar
sewer, water main, street reconstruction and appurtenances on Centur Avenue north
of Hi Avenue, Cit Project 95-11, a hearin on said improvement in accordance
with the notice dul g iven was dul held on June 24, 1996, and the council has heard
all persons desirin to be heard on the matter and has full considered the same
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is advisable, expedient,.and necessar that the Cit o Maplewood
construct sanitar sewer, water main, street reconstruction, and appurtenances on
Centur Avenue north of Hi Avenue, Cit Project 95-11, as described in the
notice of hearin thereof, and orders the same to be made.
2. The cit en is desi en for this improvement and is
hereb directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the makin of said
improvement.
3. The finance director is hereb authorized to make the financial transfers
necessar to implement the financin plan for the project.
r.7 4W A
Action by Council
MEMORANDUM
E n d o r s e d., ... ,,. .... .
Modifie
TO: City Manager Rejected-
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner Date
SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Change, Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit and
Design Review — Heather Ridge
LOCATION: Ariel Street and Highway 36
DATE: June 3, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Proposal
Gary T. Mulcahy is proposing to develop the 4.3 -acre parcel behind (east of) the Home Depot
and Cub Foods with a seven- building office complex called Heather Ridge. Refer to the maps
on pages 11--14 and the written explanation on pages 15 —17. The buildings would total 39,700
square feet. They would be one -story tall and have hip -roofs for a residential appearance. The
exteriors would be brick and stucco. Mr. Mulcahy would build this development in two phases.
The first phase would include Buildings One . through Four. Refer to the site plan on page 14.
The applicant is proposing a Combination of office and service uses at Heather Ridge.
Requests
Mr. Mulcahy is requesting that the City council approve the following:
1. Aland use plan change from R -3(M), multiple dwelling residential (medium density) to
BC(M), business commercial (modified). BC(M) allows offices, retail, restaurants and service
businesses.
2. A rezoning from R-3, multiple dwelling residential to BC(M).
3. A conditional use permit (CUP) because the site is designated as an outlot. The code
requires a CUP to build on an outlot.
4. Site, architectural and landscape plans.
BACKGROUND
November 28,1994: The city council approved a land use plan change to R -3(M) and rezoning
to R -3 for the proposed property as part of the Maplewood Retail Addition (the development
consisting of Cub Foods, Home Depot, Boston Market, Petsmart and Hollywood Video).
January 9, 1995: The city council approved the final plat for the Maplewood Retail Addition.
This approval designated the proposed parcel as an outlot.
May 21, 1996: The planning commission recommended approval of the land use plan change,
rezoning and conditional use permit.
May 28, 1996: The community design review board approved the design plans for Heather
Ridge. Refer to the attached minutes.
DISCUSSION
Land Use Plan Change and Rezoning
The city council should approve these requests. The benefits of this development outweigh the
concerns.
Benefits
1. Aesthetics Heather Ridge would be attractive. It would fit in with the multi- family
developments across Ariel Street in design and appearance and would be buffered with
landscaping. The council also could require additional landscaping along Ariel Street to
further improve the appearance of the project from the housing across the street. The view
of this office complex, with its residential -style brick and stucco buildings, would be more
attractive than the view of the back sides of Home Depot and Cub Foods.
2. Compatibility with commercial. Heather Ridge would be more compatible with the adjacent
commercial development than would a multi- family residential development. This site is not
. p
a desirable residential location since it abuts the two large service /loading areas behind
Home Depot and Cub Foods. A housing development on this site would likely be a lower -
value rental complex since it would be difficult to attract buyers for owner- occupied units.
3. A desirable complex. It is unlikely that the city will receive a more compatible development
p p
for this site than Heather Ridge. Heather Ridge would make a good transition between the
heavy commercial activity of the retail center and the apartments and town homes across
Ariel Street. A transitional use such as this meets the intent of the land use plan and the
zoning code. The land use plan and the zoning code both state that the BC(M) classification
and zoning is intended to provide for the orderly transition between more intensive
commercial uses and low or medium density residential areas. The proposed BC (M) Land
use and zoning would do this.
It is true that multiple- dwelling housing on this site would be more compatible with the
housing across Ariel Street from the standpoint of a similarity in development. The question
is the degree of compatibility. Heather Ridge would also be compatible and would create a
p wou crea
better transition in uses from the adjacent retail center to the housing in North St. Paul.
Concern
Traffic. The North St. Paul neighbors were primarily concerned with the potential for an increase
in traffic. The applicant provided a traffic study by Benshoof and Associates, Inc. which gives a
projection of the traffic that Heather Ridge would generate. This study showed that there would
be 690 vehicle trips generated per day. I compared this to the tragic generation projections
established by the Institute of Tragic Engineers (ITE). The ITE indicated that apartments on this
site would generate 166 vehicle trips per day (5.52 trips per unit per day times 30 units) and that
town houses would generate 140 vehicle trips per day (5:40 trips per unit per day times 26
2
units). The proposed office project, therefore, would generate up to 550 more vehicle trips per
day.
This figure sounds high, especially compared to the estimated vehicle trip generations for
apartments or town homes. The traffic study, however, concludes stating that "the two-way stop
n Ariel � y
signs o el Street at 11 th Avenue would continue. to be appropriate to control the projected
volumes after Heather Ridge is completed and fully occupied." This study also states that "the
proposed development would not significantly alter traffic conditions at the intersection of Ariel
Street.and the westbound Highway 36 exit ramp."
Although, the estimated traffic projections are higher than those for apartments or town homes,
staff is not overly concerned about the traffic impact. There are several reasons:
1. The North St. Paul City Engineer did not express any concern over the estimated traffic
volume with this development. Therefore, he did not seem worried that the intersection at
Ariel Street and 11th Avenue could not handle the traffic from Heather Ridge. This is what
the applicants traffic study showed.
2. The traffic activity would be higher than it would for a housing development, but evening nd
weekend g
e d traffic would be very low if there would be any at all. this would be more desirable
than the added daily traffic of a multi- family development.
3. The proposed office development isi patterned after an existing complex in the City of New
Brighton. The New Brighton city planner told me that there has not been a problem with
traffic volumes with this similar office, development in their city. The New Brighton
development, in fact, is centered between an adjacent apartment complex on the east and a
town house development (under construction) across the street on the west. The New
Brighton planner told me that they feat such an office complex was a compatible use next to
these multi - family complexes.
Site Plan Considerations
f
Gradin
Mr. Pat Conrad, of the Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District, stated four concerns in
his letter on page 18. The main problem is that some of the buildings would be too close to the
rear slope. Mr. Conrad explains that "when the district approved the grading of the entire site,
this steep slope was allowed only with the condition that no water from the top of the hill be
allowed to drain down the slope." The applicant must meet the watershed district's requirements
for r
- Hoff q
u control and ground disturbance control at the top of the slope.
It is possible that Buildings One, Two and Six may have to be shifted to the east to provide
enough distance from the slope for grading and building construction. If a suitable lan cannot
be provided p
p ed that maintains all required setbacks and parking lot dimensions, the applicant may
have to reduce building sizes or apply for variances if they cannot meet all code requirements.
3
Land scaping
The applicant should revise the landscape plan to move the trees proposed behind the buildings
to the front. These trees would not benefit the retail neighbors to the west and there is no
feasible place to plant them on the steep rear slope. The landscaping should be concentrated
along the street frontage and in front of the buildings.
Cul -de -sac
The applicant has proposed to provide a cul -de -sac at the end of Ariel Street next to Highway
36. This was a r � g od city
y
eguirement of the City of North St. Paul's city engineer and the Maplewo
engineer. The applicant should dedicate an easement for the part of this cul-de-sac that
encroaches onto this site if the council approves this project.
Conditional Use Permit
The city council should approve this CUP if they approve the proposed land use plan Change
rezoning. A CUP is only required because, this site is designated as an outlot on the lat. It was
designated a p s such because there was no specific plan for development at the time of the
platting in 1994. The review at that time was focused on the adjacent retail development.
1 p
Conclusion
The benefits of this project outweigh the concern about traffic impact. Heather Ridge would
make a good transitional use between the retail center and the housing to the east. The
complex would_ also be designed with residential com patibility in mind. In addition, the costs to
protection are generally less for a commercial development of this type compared to a medium
density residential use. Staff recommends approval based on these benefits. It has not been
shown th the estimated traffic generation levels would be excessive for the local streets and
the neighborhood.
RECOMMENDATION
A. Adopt the resolution on page 19 approving a land use plan change from R -3(M), multiple
dwelling residential (medium density) to BC(M), business commercial (modified). Approval is
based on the following reasons:
1. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's goals and policies.
2. The BC(M) land use classification would be a better transition than the R -3(M)
classification between the heavier - commercial BC (business commercial) classification to
the west and the multiple - dwellings to the east.
3. The BC(M) classification would be compatible with the adjacent residential development
to the east.
4
B. Adoption of the. resolution on page 20 approving the zone change from R -3, multiple dwelling
residential to BC(M), business commercial (modified). Approval is based on the findings
required by code in addition to the following reasons:
1. BC(M) zoning would be a better transition than R -3 zoning between the heavier-
commercial BC (business commercial) zoning to the west and the multiple - dwellings to
the east.
2. BC(M) zoning would be compatible with the adjacent residential development to the east.
C. Adopt the resolution on page 21 -22 approving a conditional use ermit for construction p t uction on a
parcel designated as an outlot. Approval is based on the findings re u'
subject to the followi � � g q fired by the code and
J ng conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director
ment may a � y of community
develo
p y pprove minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one ear f
permit shall Y o council
approval or the
p become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
D. Approve the site plan (date- stamped May 10, 1996 ) and the building elevations and
landscape plans (date- stamped March 18, 1996) for the Heather Ridge g development, based
on the findings required by the code. The developer shall do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building
project.
g permit for this
p ect. J
2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit:
g p t.
a. Provide a revised landscape plan to staff for approval moving th
pp g e trees proposed
east of the buildings to the Ariel Street frontage.
b. Provide a street easement to the city engineer for the
Y g proposed cul -de -sac in the
southeast corner of the site. The exact description of this easement is ect subj
city engineer's approval.
J to the
c. Submit a grading, drainage, utility nd erosion control '
Y of plan to the city engineer for
approval. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ra msey Soil and
Water Conservation District Erosion Control H •
Handbook. The grading, drainage
and erosion control plans shall also be subject to the approval
J pp oval of the
Ramsey/Washington
Metro Watershed District.
d. Any minor site plan changes resulting fro •
' g 9 om the review of the grading plan shall be
subject to staff approval. Any major site plan changes shall be subject ubJect to the
approval of the
community design review board or the city council if a variance is
needed.
5
e. Provide another trash enclosure at the north end of the parking lot. The location of
this shall be subject to staff approval. The design of the trash enclosures shall be
submitted to staff for approval. The trash enclosures shall be brick to match the
buildings and have closeable gates.
f. Provide a lawn- irrigation plan showing the location of sprinkler heads.
g. Provide a certificate of survey.
h. Pay the City of Maplewood $5,487.25 to share in the cost of that part the Ariel Street
construction next to Outlot A lying north of 9th Avenue.
3. Complete the following before occupying the first building of Phase l:
a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
b. Instal.1 a handicap- parking sign for each handicap - parking space and building
addresses.
c. Screen any roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property.
d.. Install the in- ground sprinkler system.
4. The parking lot shall have continuous concrete curbing. This also applies to the north
edge of the Phase I parking lot which must be curbed (code requirement). The applicant
shall also provide a looped drive aisle or a turnaround for each drive aisle at the northerly
termination of the Phase I parking lot.
5. If any required work is not done at the completion of each building, the city may allow
temporary occupancy if
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 150 % of the cost of the unfinished work.
The city may postpone this escrow requirement for a particular building if work is in
progress on a subsequent building, or subsequent buildings, in this project.
6. This approval does not include the signs. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive
sign plan for this complex.
7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
8. All of the buildings shall have the same color scheme. The applicant shall submit a
lighting plan to staff for approval.
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
surveyed owners of the 32 properties within 350 feet of the ro osed
four were in favor � p p site. Of the 13 .replies,
and 9 objected.
In Favor
1. There would be less noise in the evening and weekends due to less traffic; probably better
looking than apartments; less people roaming he area; th
' g ey would be here on business.
do not obje but would hope a lot more planting of trees, shrubs would accomp t
office buildings - their lands p Y hese
g landscaping. (Sengoz, 2033 9th Avenue E.)
2. Should not result in too much additional traffic. As art of the Cub St
Maplewood r p ore approval,
Ma
p promised to put in a stop at Ariel and 11 th. Where is it? (Becker 2037 9th
A venue E.)
Opposed
1. 1 am concerned about the traffic on Ariel Street. There is so much more '
o e traffic on 11th
Avenue from Cub Foods. How will we and the apartment eo !e et out on
p p g to 11th Avenue if
we have more business traffic to deal with? Also, I face Ariel and I really mis
trees that the too
ook away. Y s looking at the
Y ay. We don't have any birds or rabbits anymore because there is no
where for them to hide. Please consider planting some trees for the birds
s look much nicer. ,and to make
things er. Thanks for reading. (Cusick, 2437 Crestwood Drive
2. I object with the construction of the business park. I feel more business development in the
is p k
area is too much! (McMaster, 2 Williams Wood)
3. The view from my home of a parkin lot is not pleasant. g p t. An area of town homes would be a
setting comparable to our area. When two communities border
each other, some
consideration should be given to what is adjacent to an established neighborhood.
2047 9th Avenue E.)
eighborhood. (Mons,
4. 1 miss the trees and don't want more business in there! 2049 9th Avenue e E.)
5. There is already too much traffic in this area. With the new shopping
et off of Ariel pp g center, you cannot
hardly g el as it is. I don't feel this is a place for concentrating n
businesses t lac g Y more
. There are empty y p es in several of the strip malls near here and with the
coming of summer the street becomes a playground for the neighborhood chi
re g children. Plus
was under the impression ssion that the big trees on that property were suppose to be left in tact.
Not replaced with blacktop. Enough already!!! ! ! How about a little !
Y e green space. We don't
need buildings on every square inch of property. Let them build it next to Maplewood
Community Center for maybe across the street from there. Better et tell
iii Y I Mr. Mulcahy to
build across from his house... (Murphy, 2041 9th Avenue E.)
6. -No!! This was zoned for housing units. I do not think Ariel Avenue '
would provide good
business access. We have #s of children and adults walking n this stre '
about traffic • • g eet with heavy traffic.
and ! worry affic fatalities with the tremendous increase in traffic in this area. It
7
appears to be that the City of Maplewood is more interested in the tax levies than the quality
of life for its residents. (Nissila, 2035 9th Avenue E.)
7. Current access to 11th Avenue from Ariel is already seeing increased vehicle volumes (Cub
Foods and Home Depot) to the point of making access difficult. There is only one access to
this area of apartments and town houses. In my opinion, a semi -four should be required for
further vehicle volumes on Ariel which would be case if these office buildings were approved
for rezoning. If a semi -four were installed, my objections to the project would disappear.
(Wentworth, 2045 9th Avenue E.)
8. It may devalue my property as this will be directly across the street. (Sticha, 2441 Crestwood
Drive)
9. You will do what you want to anyway! You already built the center so why not more
business. Family homes don't seem important anymore. (Vatne, recently oved from 2039
9th Avenue E. ) Y
0
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 4.3 acres
Existing land use: undeveloped
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: A storm water holding pond, 11th Avenue and a future 31 -unit town house complex.
South: Highway 36.
West: Home Depot and Cub Foods.
East: Ariel Street, Cedar Heights Apartments and Crestwood Townhomes.
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: R -3(M)
Zoning: R -3
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36- 437(7) requires a CUP to build on an outlot.
Section 25 -70 requires that the community design review board (CDRB) mak . g e the following
findings to approve plans:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship o
neighboring, existing or proposed p sed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the
desirability of investment or Occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably
interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and
p ,
that is will not create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development in kee in with the character keeping a acter of
the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and
attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal
plan.
p
3. That the design. p p and location of the proposed development would rovide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetical of 9 ood
composition, materials, textures and colors.
Land Use Plan Change — Criteria to Approve
The land use plan does not list any specific findings to amend the land
g use plan maps. The plan
lists developmental goals and policies, however. The intent of these are to create harmonious
neighborhoods that are aesthetic, orderly and minimize conflicts between adjacent land uses.
0
Rezoning Criteria to Approve
Section 36 -485 of the zoning ordinance requires that the
q page 20 city counci! determine four findin s to
approve a rezoning. Refer to these findings listed in the resolution on g
.
Conditional Use Permit- Criteria to Approve
pp e
Sections 36- 442(x) and 36-439(b) require .
O q that the city council determines specific findings
grant a CUP. Refer to these findings listed in the p ngs to
g e resolution on pages 21 -22.
p- sec 111heather5. mem
Attachments:
1 Location Map
2 Land Use Plan Map
3 Property Line/Zoning Map
4, Site Plan
5 Applicant's Land Use Plan Justification
6 Applicant's Rezoning Justification
7 Letter from Pat,Conrad dated April 10, 1996
8 Land Use Plan Change Resolution
g Rezoning Resolution
10 Conditional Use Permit Resolution
I I Sde and grading plans date- stamped May 10, 1996 arat
se
t 2 Budding and landscape plans date-stamped P e attachment}
mped March 18, 1996 (separate attachment)
.t
LOCATION MAP
Q
N
Attachment 1 .
y
FIGHTS
b1
I
65 �
U WHITE BLAR LA
65
COUNTY ROAD D
RD. D
GALL AVE
w 4 " eR F�
o
WOODLYNN AVE.
p
c
Cr
19 Cr
LYD lA Q
0
MW a
E o A VE.
a a-
f d 8
o
1.
o
D O
�, �, P
06 Y w
O
p Y
2 �
1. SUMMIT CT.
2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR.
Sr w
- _ o m
v w V)
�r
STANDRIDGE
3.
3. DULUTH CT.
6r do, �
�'b
o Q � Z
= MAPLE
LA.
.�
4. LYDIA ST. cn
S
0
BEAM
AVE.
BEAM ,'P
AVE.
19
f-
19 Y MAPLE
VIEW AVE.
o
RADATZ
A V E
�4
0
3
0
M° ° d
MESSA81 AV
w
Z
Po
SSE
NORTH
SAIN
2
COUNTY Cr EE
COURT
L)
L
K
AVE.
U
�
N
w KOHLMAN C asey
Q Hor wood
0
AVE. Lake
w
E.,
`n
Pork
W 23
0 Z
3
2
3 �3
ROAD
C
c�
Z
W
=
°
CT
Z
�
Cr.
Z
g
�
^
( 1
EDGEHILL RD. 65
j
:ON
NO R
DEMON T
AVE.
m
Q
I cric BROOKS
AVE
N BROOKS
Cr
Q.
SEX'
I
TANT
N
AVE. �D
Z N s os
�
EL _.v,M
A��E
?
AVE.
Pflrk
pS�'
GERVAIS
AVE. >-
GERVAIS
�`'
� ¢
GERVAIS .,.,.,.
IVA
v
GRANDVIEW
AVE.
z
CT. . ❖.•.•
m
VIKING
DR.
Y
❖: ❖:
:,;, :,.,
r
SHERREty AVE.
�
Knuc cE it ad Lake
-. .-E AVE. �
��
CO '`�E. PQ' �'
�
v
�
COP
COPE
AVE. ►-
_
LARK :5
CT
�`' �-
Q u7
AVE.
t LARK
Q AVE.
a
N u;
LAURIE
RD.
CO.
RD.
v
LAURIE RD.
�snwwooeo
LAURIE
z RD.
w
z
O
RD. c
o Q
=
D URST
Z p cr
AVE.
w
v
J
v w
Z
INCTION
AVE. �'
Z
: fE
~
v,
W W
CO. RD.
65
>
B =
�5
�a eU E
AVE. m
BURKE
AVE. o
°
BURKE AVE.
Cent
N
�G
J , N
ARp
c �'T
ELDR
LN
1DGE
AVE.
John O"^
64
SAP
pVE.
I BELMONT ,
AVE.
4,
_
O
toy\
N�*"
AV
E.
Gvtewv
city Hon
-�
L
SKILL MAN
AVE.
HARRIS AVE.
w
SHE
ROSEWOOD AVE.
N. c
3
RY AN
AV.
ROSEWOO
NURSING RAMSEY COUNTY
FAIR 0 �
AVE. S.
GROU
LOCATION MAP
Q
N
Attachment 2
interchange
interchange ► ,principal arterial 694
Vadnais Heights OS ;�. - ' 8C major
- Co. Rd. 0 c- oIIect
M_1■ °
m !� BC
major collector _ = ■ ° - -�
_ .Q" BC
.1� - ---- --
min arterial !� E
Rgarn ... - i a l
BC(M L BC(M) . R B R'1
'+ OS LBC
3 -
M. 1 R-•3(M) _ -
O _ m
3 (M)
o R oo m , -
3 C - - - R- ,
IL
C o ; did. C major collecrar� - - All t r
as
Fbf
■
• A - 3-' - 0 0S
C 0 . ....... BC H
R— R_ P _
03
-.-- . - .
major collector-_ - '` - •:: % `.
G _._ LBC 6C R -3(M
ap
z. M 1
- ma o i'�rtwial L Hi hwa 3fi
. % i � 8 y inter nge �
Z G
C
.0 V ,.
i C
d LU
•, C
C V O
` m
O d
E r
HAZELWOOD
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN
PROPOSED BC(M) LAND USE
4
N
12
AffArhmpnf I
a% W4
4.14 3
id 0 ffTl
ll 83
60 (7 3 a^)
I-, A lkw
NLE ------ /_ 311
"ST . )
u a: .40 ( (w 4
J 7
344.3'7't A
c
it I ow
—TIM
Z
ui ■
>
y+- ._.e ►� DENTAL OFFICE,, t R3
---` :S ■ ,__., � ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ .�,� .o D ENTAL OFFICE
-JUNDER C
ONST
low
in *MAN m iq
str *+es
Ll
AV 6
BOSTON MARKET 3 '`0 2
fv
f .7
o o h s
13
A 4)
1.3v-4- AVt.
J s i
2
MIN en I
ELEVENTH AVENUE
747
sr st 4 .4
A 14 AX + •
-
in b-,� ounor N ffic
Lu
CUB s
4 � � r 1.V r
ti
FOODS "�..`� 5 `�
C0 .10
CkEs
wk
HOLLYWOOD '• "'•'•"" "'
. ...........
0 W 0.0 0 *. . .....
_uj
xv
VIDEO "'
ra
241. #4y 0
Y JUP
40
N. "
PETSMART
7 HOME .....: : ::........:....:..:.
............... :..
.................
................
DEPOT .:..... :..... :..::.......
................
c
l k
'9
A-SO
- - - - - -, �---- - - - - -- 262. Z3
Ek 0
HIGHWAY 36- - - - -- SRI -V - - - --
WVJY E-SMT
H 7 wy 'Esm 3
/
■ N M611, _1 a-
Lft
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
PROPOSED HEATHER RIDGE SITE
P9 , 13 PROPOSED BC(M) ZONING
C� �DOC
APARTMENTS
�a a
0'f4G; --- :- - - -Sla.i14; . - - -
M)
1 4
7Z
a41
( 29 16 t
(46) 1
wl
4
Attachment 4
E i I
VE 'V '
AVtriv
amm
or
�--
g� 936 -� ''`- -- - ---•c - i • - - --
P ,�! Il f ; 1 I I I ;
ftj , �'� IHOLDING�I I,I,�
f► 1
r 'I II I POND �i � �� � fl i M
i t l i x Mo i/i1� 1 a
( o
�- - -- nl 932 — . % / / 1 v►
- t-
i
CUB
�XV (
FOOD 1�� -� �
I
I !�
—o — i t, '
LLJ ;
�� /, �� : • NINTH AVENUE
Ix"
a ll
W 1
v)
1 • s
HOME l ol l
���! o I
DEPOT i ��
s�
• ••::•
AA ;:.
•
fill a 41�
1 Q � v -� . ..�. -r r, is t•s s
;,�b�br �'.� �' Goon •� ......e,�.�
f �r
C D/1G'
36
HIGHWAY �
SITE PLAN
PROPOSED HEATHER RIDGE
OFFICE PARK
pg. 14
--�- }� --V }�
4
N
Attachment 5
C014PREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Supporting Statements for Application:
Intended use of the Property
It. is proposed to use the property to construct a campus style
office building development. The proposal includes seven buildings
totalling 39,,700 square feet of gross floor space,
The buildings will be single story wood frame structures with hip
roofs and brick and stucco exteriors resulting in a high qualit
residential style architectural design. The site will have a well
developed landscaping plan.
Justification for Coml2rehensive Plan . Amendment
It is our recommendation that the comprehensive plan be amended
from medium density residential to commercial use to allow the
construction of the proposed office campus . The commercial land
use will result in a better transition from the high use retail
west of this site to the high density residential to the east.
Other advantages for this proposed use include reduced night time
and weekend traffic, higher tax base than townhome land uses, and
higher quality architecture and landscaping resulting in a much
improved curb appeal compared to typical multi. -fami. ly developments •
It is our recommendation that the proposed office use represents
the highest and best use of the land in this location.
1.
The developer intends to retain long -term ownership of the
development which will result in a p higher quality of development
from construction through the operation of this site, The
developer does not intend to request subsidies or incentives from
the City to implement the proposed development.
Lmpact_on Utilities
We have compared the proposed land use to that which would be
permitted by the current land use and Zoning plans. The proposed
-- P P
land use would have a reduced impact on sanitary sewer and water
systems.
Included with this submittal is a map showing the location of the
proposed development within the City and - a photocopy of the
Hazelwood Neighborhood Land Use Plan from `the City's adopted
comprehensive plan showing this site as R-3(M) land use •
15
Rt Z oNI NG
Impact of Re-Zon Public Welfare
Traffi
The proposed use would result in a higher tot '
g al traffic lc count, than
would result from a townhouse development. However, that traffic
would have concentrations Burin the morning gaud afternoon peak
with the balance of the traffic being spread, more or le
ughout the busines ss
uniformly thro ,
s day. It is anticipated that
traffic generation from this site would • ng
evenings and weekends.
be extremely light during
Based on our rev' •
review of the Site Traffic
Impact Report prepared for the Map lewood Retail •
opinion that p all De velopment, it i s
our
• p, the traffic generated by this site will
negligible impacts on 13th Avenue an have
d White Bear Avenue.
S and Fire:
The i
proposed land use would have lower r •
ris due to fire hazard than
residential land uses since the buildings w'
u g 111 have sprinkler
-systems with adequate ate fire hydrants located within the site.
build will be adequately spaced The
q y p ed to allow good access around the
buildings,
Light and open Space:
The site design provides generous separations •
bu The s' p ns between the various
sit features a well landscaped site which '
s .Well
promote open space. The buildings g will all be single story with
hip which ch will provide adequate light. Due to '
the increased
separation between buildings, there will be windows on all sides
all of the buildings to further enhance interior � °f
light.
Avoiding over - Crowding:
The site has increased separation between •
n the various buildings.
Also most of the buildings are set --back a considerable distance
•
from A riel Street .,�
The _ i ldings are further separated
significantly from the exis p
tang buildings within the Maplewood
Retail Development by both, horizontal '
separat�.on exceeding 120
feet, and a vertical separation in which
h this site i set
approximately 20 feet above the retail center* This design will
result in a general feeling of openness and space.
pace.
Conserving Property Values:
This development will conserve o r ert •
high alit s' P l andscaping and architectura p Y values by virtue of its
u
g quality sit de landscapi
the buildings. Property values 1 design of
p Y lues will be further enhanced because
the
developer intends to retain ownership f the •
p property which
16
will result initial higher quality construction and improved
long term site and building maintenance.
In our opinion, the proposed rezoning will enhance the values of
the adjacent properties.
Im acts on the Character of the Nei hborhood:
The neighborhood includes a high density retail development to the
west Highway 36 to the p
, g y south and high density residential to the
east. A stormwater pond is located to the north. The ro osed
project provides a high u • p p
P g quality and appropriate transition use
between the high density retail development to the west and the
high density residential development to the east,
ast.
Im act. of Re -Zonin on Municipal Facilities:
The existing municipal facilities including streets, sanitar
sewers, watermains, schools and arks are Y
p r adequate to support the
proposed re- zoning.
Streets include Ariel Street on the east which will p rovide direct
access to the site. STH 36 is a principal arterial through
STH 3 6 to Ariel Street which
h
Maplewood. There is an off -ram from • ch
g
•
will provide access. 11th Avenue is a collector street and White
Bear Avenue is a minor arterial. All of these streets will
provide
excellent access to the site and will allow traff*c to function
well.
Sewer and watermains are adequate to provide service for this
development. " The sanitary sewer and watermains in Ariel Street are
facilities of the City f North Saint
Y Paul. We have had
conversations with North Saint Paul's staff in which they have
indicated their will. in ness to rovide se '
g p service to thin development
through these facilities. The proposed land use would p lace less
demand on the sewer and water facilities than the existing
townhouse zoning.
There would be no impact on schools from the
proposed office
development. In fact, this would result In an increase tax base
with a reduction of demand on the schools and park system as
compared to the townhome zoning.
A copy of a portion of the City Zoning Map showin g the area is
enclosed.
17
Ramsey- Washington Metro Attachment 7
e,
District 1902 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
(612) 777 -3665
fax (612) 777 -6307
Tom Ekstrand
Maplewood Community Development
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Heather Ridge
Dear Mr. Ekstrand,
Thank you for submitting the preliminary plans for the above referenced project. The District has
some serious concerns regarding this development. Our formost concern is for the stability of the
slope on the west side of the site. When the District approved the grading of the enure site, this
steep slope was allowed only with the condition that no water from on top of the hill be allowed to
drain down the slope. The plans for Heather Ridge show several of the buildings being built right
into the side of the slope with the rooftop drainage going down the slope. The District's permit
will require that the plans be revised so that no water is directed onto the slope.
The District also required that no overflow of water could go down the slope. The proposed plans
need to be modified slightly to ensure that the parking lot overtops into the street instead of down
the slope. A small berm must be constructed just to the north of the northern entrance drive.
Another concern related to the buildings in the side of the slope is that the soil on the slope will be
exposed during construction. The District's permit will require that the soil on the slope be
covered at all times during construction.
The District is also concerned about the stockpiling of soil that will occur when the building
foundations are excavated. Stock piles should not be allowed adjacent to the slope.
Please contact me at 777 -3665 if you have any questyions regarding this matter.
Thank You,
atric .Conrad
District Technician
April 10th, 1996
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Gary T. Mulcahy applied for a change to the city's land use plan from R -3(M),
multiple dwelling residential (medium density) to BC(M), business commercial (modified).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located on the northwest corner of Highway
36 and Ariel Street. The legal description is:
OUTLOT A, MAPLEWOOD RETAIL. ADDITION
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On May 21 1996, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff
published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the
city council the land use plan change.
2. On , 1996, the city council discussed the land use plan change.
They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city
y
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
change for the following reasons:
1. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's goals and policies.
2. The BC(M) land use classification would be a better transition than the R -3(M)
classification between the heavier - commercial BC (business commercial) classification to
the west and the multiple - dwellings to the east.
3. The BC(M) classification would be compatible with the adjacent residential development
to the east.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on —1 1996.
19
ZONING MAP CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Gary T. Mulcahy applied for a change in the zoning map from R -3, multiple
dwelling residential to BC(M), business commercial (modified).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property at the northwest corner of Highway 36 and
Ariel Street. The legal description is:
OUTLOT A, MAPLEWOOD RETAIL ADDITION
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1.. On May 21, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city Council approve
the change.
2. On _, 1996, the city council held a public hearing. The city taff
published a notice i Y
p n the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing an Opportunity to speak and
present written statements. The council also considered re orts and recommendations
s
from the city staff and planning Commission.
,NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council approve the above- described
change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zonin g code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring
property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property
adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
q Y g
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the-community,
where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers
police and fire protection and schools.
5. BC(M) zoning would be a better transition than R -3 zoning between the heavier-
commercial BC (business commercial) zoning to the west and the multiple dwellings to
the east.
6. BC(M) zoning would be compatible with the adjacent residential development to the east.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on _, 1996
20
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Gary T. Mulcahy applied for a conditional use permit to construct an office
development on property designated as an outlot.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property t the northwest corner of Highway Y g ay 36 and
Ariel Street. The legal description is:
OUTLOT A, MAPLEWOOD RETAIL ADDITION
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On May 21, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council
this permit.
2. The city council held a public hearing on , 1996. City staff p ublished a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required
law.. T g p p Y q i ed by
The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written
statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff
and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - describe d
conditional use permit, because:
pp
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surroundin g area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -Off, vibration, eneral unsightliness, electrical
g g ,
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for p ublic facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
21
, 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
10. The use meets the minimum size and frontage requirements g q rements provided for in the ordinance.
11. The use has the requisite public improvements.
12. The permitted density under this code has not been transferred to ano ther parcel and is,
therefore, sufficient to accommodate the proposed construction.
13. The outlot is not to be used for permanent common open space.
p p ce.
14. The proposed construction can overcome or accommodate topographical
problems and
peculiar site characteristics.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved b the city. The director of community
Y Y
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one Y ear of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on
�I 1996.
22
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, MAY 21 1996
V. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Heather Ridge (Ariel Street and Highway 36)—Land Use Plan Change (R -3M to BC -M), Zoning
Map Change (R -3 to BC-M), and Conditional Use Permit
Ken Roberts, associate planner, read the public hearing notice and presented the staff report.
Mr. Roberts answered questions from the commission. Hank Breems was present re resentin
P 9
Gary Mulcahy, the applicant. Mr. Breems displayed a model of the .proposed office Complex.
Commissioner Rossbach questioned comments b staff and the developer about a
Y p commercial
development with a "residential feel." Mr. Breems responded that, as a developer and as far as
the city was concerned, they were looking at the highest and best use of the land. He gave
some comparisons between residential and commercial.
Planning Commission -2-
M i n ute s of 05 -21 -96
Commissioner Axdahl asked about the view to the west over these buildings. Mr. Breems said
they were - limited on the west side of the site because of the slope and watershed district
concerns. He added that the developer is open to city landscaping recommendations. Jim
De6enedet, civil engineer, Ray Raffel, architect, Jim Benshoof, traffic engineer, and Sid Lindahl
of Mulcahy, Inc. were also present for the applicant. Chairperson Axdahl asked for comments
from the public. There were no comments so the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Rossbach said he thought the staff report was very opinionated. He further
stated that he felt that every opportunity for comment in the report was "slanted toward" the side
of the applicant. As an example, he mentioned the references to "how residential" the developer
was trying to make everything look. Mr. Rossbach also alluded to various items in the staff
recommendation that he felt were strictly opinion and not fact.
Mr. Rossbach said the increased traffic and the increased impervious surface on the top of the
hill (199 parking spaces as opposed to approximately 60 for a residential development) were
definitely concerns that needed to be considered.. He spoke about the requirement for screening
of the roof -top equipment on the office complex but not for the Cub Foods and Home Depot
buildings. Mr. Rossbach felt creating a buffer from the Cub Foods /Home Depot retail
development was not as great a concern because of the elevations. Mr. Rossbach said R -3 was
still the best use for this area.
Commissioner Thompson said the skimmer booms in the stormwater ponding area have not
been functioning, and he expressed concern about adding more runoff to an already existing
problem. Commissioner Fischer originally had no problem with this site as residential, but, after
observing the view of the commercial rooftops from the area, she thought the appropriate
qualities for residential development were definitely lacking.
Melinda Coleman, director of community development, responded to Commissioner Rossbach's
comments. She said it was a difficult project to review, and staff gave careful consideration.
Factors -such as surrounding land uses, the City of North St. Paul's opinion that the increased
traffic was not a major concern, and the benefit to the area of only having the increased traffic
from 8 -5 p.m., not evenings and weekends, influenced the staff recommendation. Ms. Coleman
added that "planning is not always black and white," and sometimes has to be an opinion.
Commissioner Frost said he agreed with Commissioner Fischer that the view overlooking the
retail area was definitely not favorable for residential development.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a land use plan change from R -3(M), multiple
dwelling residential (medium density) to BC(M), business commercial (modified). Approval is
based on the following reasons:
1. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's goals and policies.
2. The BC(M) land use classification would be a better transition than the R -3(M)
classification between the heavier - commercial BC (business commercial) classification to
the west and the multiple - dwellings to the east.
3. The BC(M) classification would be compatible with the adjacent residential development
to the east.
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 05 -21 -96
B. Adoption of the resolution which approves the zone change from R -3, multiple dwelling
residential to BC(M), business commercial (modified). Approval is based on the findings
required by code in addition to the following reasons:
1. BC(M) zoning would be a better transition than R -3 zoning between the heavier-
commercial BC (business commercial) zoning to the west and the multiple - dwellings to
the east. '
2. BC(M) zoning would be compatible with the adjacent residential development to the east.
C. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for construction on a
parcel designated as an outiot. Approval is based on the findings required by the code and
subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
D.. Approval of the site plan (date- stamped May 10, 1996) and the building elevations and
landscape plans (date - stamped March 18, 1996) for the Heather Ridge development, based
on the findings required by the code. The developer shall do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit
for this project.
2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit:
a. Provide a revised landscape plan to staff for approval moving the trees proposed
east of the buildings to the Ariei Street frontage.
b. Provide a street easement to the city engineer for the proposed cul-de -sac in the
southeast corner of the site. The exact description of this easement is subject to the
city engineer's approval.
c. Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for
approval. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and
Water Conservation District Erosion Control Handbook. The grading, drainage
and erosion control plans shall also be subject to the approval of the
Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District .
d. Any minor site plan changes resulting from the review of the grading plan shall be
subject to staff approval. Any major site plan changes shall be subject to the
approval of the community design review board or the city council if a. variance is
needed.
e. Provide another trash enclosure at the north end of the parking lot. The location of
this shall be subject to staff approval. The design of the trash enclosures shall be
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 05 -21 -96
submitted to staff for approval. The trash enclosures shall be brink to snatch the
buildings and have closeable gates.
f. Provide a lawn - irrigation plan showing the location of sprinkler heads.
g. Provide a certificate of survey.
h. Pay the City of Maplewood $5,487.25 to share in the cost of that part the Ariel Street
construction next to Outiot A lying north of 9th Avenue.
3. Complete the following before occupying the first building of Phase I:
a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
b. Install a handicap- parking sign for each handicap - parking space and building y
addresses.
c. Screen any roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property.
d. Install the in- ground sprinkler system.
4. The parking lot shall have continuous concrete curbing. This also applies to the north
edge of the Phase I parking lot which must be curbed (code requirement). The applicant
shall also provide a looped drive aisle or a turnaround for each drive aisle at the northerly
termination of the Phase I parking lot.
5. If any required work is not done at the completion of each building, the city may allow
temporary occupancy if :
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
The city may postpone this escrow requirement for a particular building if work is in
progress on a subsequent building, or subsequent buildings, in this project.
6. This approval does not include the signs. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive
sign plan for this complex.
7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes— Axdahl, Fischer, Kopesky, Frost, Kittridge,
Thompson, Brueggeman, Ericson
Nays-- Rossbach
The motion passed.
Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes of 05 -28 -96
A. -Heather Ridge Office Complex, Highway 36 and Adel Street —Land Use Plan Change,
Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit and Design Review
Hank Breems, representing Gary T. Mulcahy, was present at the meeting. He said they did
not have any problems with the recommendations by staff. Mr. Breems displayed a model of
the complex. He also said they were willing to work with staff on the landscaping.
Mr..Breems explained that the building and parking lot construction will be phased, but the
complete site will be. graded and have utilities installed. Mr. Breems then showed pictures of
a similar office complex in New Brighton. He said the Heather Ridge development would
have brick on the bottom of the buildings and stucco on the top.
Boardmember Vidyashankar moved the Community Design Review Board recommend:
D. Approval of the site plan (date- stamped May 10, 1996) and the building elevations and
landscape plans (date- stamped March 18, 1996) for the Heather Ridge development,
based on the findings required by the code. The developer shall do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit
for this project.
2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit:
a. Provide a revised landscape plan to staff for approval moving the trees proposed
east of the buildings to the Ariel Street frontage.
b. Provide a street easement to the city engineer for the proposed cul -de -sac in the
southeast corner of the site. The exact description of this - easement is subject to
the city engineer's approval.
c. Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for
approval. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and
Water Conservation District Erosion Control Handbook. The grading,
drainage and erosion control plans shall also be subject to the approval of the
Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District.
d. Any minor site plan changes resulting from the review of the grading plan shall be
subject to staff approval. Any major site plan changes shall be subject to the
approval of the community design review board or the city council if a variance is
needed.
e. Provide another trash enclosure at the north end of the parking lot. The location
of this shall be subject to staff approval. The design of the trash enclosures shall
be submitted to staff for approval. The trash enclosures shall be brick to match
the buildings and have closeable gates.
Community Design Review Board .3.
Minutes of 05 -28 -96
f. Provide a lawn- irrigation plan showing the location of sprinkler heads.
g. Provide a certificate of survey.
h. Pay the City of Maplewood $5,487.25 to share in the cost of that P art the Ariel
Street construction next to Outlot A lying north of 9th Avenue.
3. Complete the following before occupying the first building of Phase I:
a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
b. Install a handicap- parking sign for each handicap - parking space and building
addresses.
c. _ Screen any roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property.
d. Install the in- ground sprinkler system.
4. The parking lot shall have continuous concrete curbing. This also applies to the north
edge of the Phase I parking lot which must be curbed (code requirement). The
applicant shall also provide a looped drive aisle or a turnaround for each drive aisle at
the northerly termination of the Phase I parking lot.
5. if any required work is not done at the completion of each building, the city may allow
temporary occupancy if
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
The city may postpone this escrow requirement for a particular building if work is in
progress on a subsequent building, or subsequent buildings, in this project.
6. This approval does not include the signs. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive
sign plan for this complex.
7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
8. All of the buildings in Phase 1 and 2 shall have a uniform color scheme. The applicant
shall submita lighting and signage plan to staff for approval.
Boardmember Robinson seconded. Ayes —all
C*7 aw 3
Action by C ounc it i
E n d o r s e d..,.,,,,,
MEMORANDUM Modified --.,,
Re J ecteii
TO: City Manager Date
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit, Setback Variance and Design Review
PROJECT: Goodrich Golf Dome
LOCATION: Van Dyke Street and Ripley Avenue
DATE: June 1.3, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Greg Mack, of the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department, wants to build an
inflatable dome for public golfing. The proposed location is the northwest corner of Van Dyke
Street and Ripley Avenue, south of Aldrich Arena. (See the location map on page 11 and the
.property line map on page 12.) Ramsey County owns this property and would contract with an
operator to build and manage the dome under a license agreement. The dome would be white
fabric and 65 feet tall, and the base of the dome would be 160 feet by 210 feet. There would be
31 hitting stalls in the dome. On the east side of the dome, there would be a one -story, 32'x 50'
rock -face concrete -block building. (See the proposed site plan on page 13.) This building would
be the entrance to the dome (through an airlock) and would .haverestrooms, office space and
support space for the dome. (See the building elevations and drawings on the enclosed plans.)
They want to operate the golf dome between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. seven days a week. They may
have the golf dome open for fewer hours in the winter. (See the letter from Greg Mack on page
16.)
Requests
To build this project, Ramsey County is requesting that the city approve:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP).
Section 36 -437 of the city Code allows the City council to approve a CUP for a public service
or public building uses in any zoning district.
2. A setback Variance to build the golf dome 20 feet from the Ripley Street right -of -way. The
city code requires a 30- foot - setback for a building from a street right -of -way.
3. The building design, site and Landscape plans.
BACKGROUND
On November 14, 1994, the city council considered a request for a similar golf dome on this site.
The council denied the conditional use permit for the dome based on the findings in the city
code.
On June 3, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city approve the proposed
conditional use permit and setback variance for the golf dome. Refer to the attached minutes.
On, 11, 1996, the community design review board recommended approval of the site,
building design and landscaping plans. Refer to the attached minutes.
DISCUSSION
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Location
Several people have expressed concerns about the proposed location of the dome. The Count
staff felt that being near the existing streets, parking areas and utilities would be a benefit. In
addition, the County expects the golf dome to complement the facilities at Goodrich Golf Course.
They want golfers to use the dome for a warmup area before playing on the golf Course. The
county plans to have a paging system in the dome to alert golfers to their start time. Street
access to the proposed site is good and there would be no need to build additional parking. This
snakes for a more efficient use of the existing public facilities and lessens the project costs.
Another location suggested for the golf dome is the former race track area north of the County
Parks building. At this location, the dome would, be more hidden. However, this site has six
problems: poor access, lack of parking, lack of utilities, an existing storm water pond and the
Williams Brothers pipeline.
The nearest existing paved parking area is about 500 feet to the south in front of the County
Parks building. To use this site, the county would have to pave more parking next to the dome.
In addition, access to the north site is not as convenient as the proposed site on Ripley Avenue.
Vehicles would have to go north from Ripley on Van Dyke Street or east from Frost Avenue
around the barn and nursing home to get to the facility. An alternate access to this area would
be another driveway to White Bear, Avenue near the horseshoe pits.
A storm water pond is in the center of the track area. The Maplewood storm water plans (page
15) show this pond as part of the city's planned storm water system. The county could not build
the dome in the pond. Ken Haider, the city engineer, does not feel that the city or county could
move the pond.
Another problem with the north site is the Williams Brothers pipeline. It crosses the site from
Goodrich Golf Course on the southeast to the DNR Trail on the northwest. (See the map on
page 1.5.) The city code requires any new building to be at least 100 feet from the nearest
pipeline.
An alternate Location to the proposed site would be on the south end of the parking lot that is
east of the nursing home. However, the disadvantage of this site is the distance from the golf
course entrance.
Traffic
Ramsey County hopes to average about 1,000 customers a week at the golf dome. This would
be an average of 143 users per day. For a twelve -hour day, this would be an average of twelve
customers per hour or one every five minutes. The county traffic engineer told me that the dome
should not cause any traffic problems.
2
Parking
Ramsey County is not proposing any additional parking for the dome. Dome users would use the
Aldrich Arena parking lot and the lot across Van Dyke Street to the east. With the lot across Van
Dyke Street, the county could segregate the dome parking from Aldrich Arena parking. The city
code does not have a parking standard for a golf dome. As proposed, the facility would have 31
tee boxes and a 1,600 square -foot support facility building. At the most, the proposed golf dome
should need up to 70 parking spaces. This would include 62 spaces for the 31 tee boxes and 8
for the service building. The county feels that the existing parking lots are large enough for their
needs. If a problem develops, there is a vacant area west of the, proposed golf dome site to add
more spaces.
When the County repaved the Aldrich Arena Lot, they striped the lanes but not individual parking
stalls. Section 36 -22(e) of city code requires that all parking lots have single - striped parking
spaces. The county should finish striping the part of the parking lot between Aldrich Arena and
the golf dome as required by code (9.5 -foot -wide stalls or 9- foot -wide signed employee stalls). In
addition, the parking lot does not have curbing. Section 36 -22(c) requires continuous concrete
curbing. Since the county did not previously have curbing, they should add concrete curb the
south side of their lot. This would finish the edge of the parking lot after the county installs the
golf dome. ;
On- Street Parking Ban
The Maplewood Police Departmentereco.mmends that the county post both sides of Ripley
Avenue for no parking. With the business curb cuts on the south side, the city should keep the
street clear of parked cars. This will improve visibility for cars leaving the driveways. In addition,
this will help insure that fewer pedestrians will be trying to cross Ripley Avenue to the county
property.
The county has already posted part of Van Dyke Street north of Ripley Avenue for no parking.
However, the installer put the signs parallel to the street instead of perpendicular to the curb.
The county should turn these signs so they are visible from Van Dyke Street. in addition, the
county should post the curve on Van Dyke Street north of Ripley for no parking.
SETBACK VARIANCE
To fit the golf dome on the proposed site between the existing parking lot and Ripley Avenue,
the county has asked to have the dome setback 20 feet from the Ripley Avenue right -of -way.
This requires a 10- foot - setback variance since the city code requires a 30- foot- setback for
buildings from a street right -of- way.._ If the county put the dome 30 feet back of Ripley Avenue, it
would encroach into the existing parking. lot.
For the city to approve a variance, the council must find that there is a unique hardship for the
request. The unique building materials and the need for a security fence around the dome
require a site wider than a block or brick building. This setback request should not cause any
visibility or site problems. This is because Ramsey County owns all the property on the north
side of Ripley Avenue and there are no other buildings on that side of the street.
3
Building Design
The code requires three findings to approve a building design. These findings are on page 9.
The second finding says that "the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping
p p g
with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious,
Orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the City's comprehensive
municipal plan." The third finding says that "the design and location of the proposed
development would provide a desirable .environment for its occupants, as well as for its
neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors."
Around this site the existing buildings have a mix of exterior materials and color. They range
from wood siding with fake -stone accents (South China Island) to concrete block (Aldrich Arena
and Mid America Bank) - to stucco (Perkins). The support and service building for the dome
would have rock -face concrete block and a standing seam metal mansard. It should be
compatible with the surrounding buildings.
Undoubtedly the design of the dome would be unique to the area. It would be much taller (65
feet) than the surrounding buildings. It would be 22 feet taller than Aldrich Arena. The owner of
the Perkins Restaurant complained that the dome would block the view of their sign and
. g
restaurant from White Bear Avenue. However, the dome may bring Perkins additional business.
Whether the design would aesthetically fit the surrounding area is the question. This is a
subjective decision that will vary with individuals. If the council is not sure how the dome would
look, they could require that the county hire a consultant to produce a computer generated
p
photo. The consultant could insert a drawing of the dome in a photo of the background. This
could show how the dome would look in comparison to the surrounding uses.
Landscaping and Screening
The developer is proposing an attractive landscaping plan. (See the plan on page 14.) This plan
has more trees on the west end of the dome than the plan the county submitted to the city in
1994. However, the proposed. plan shows six Amur Maple trees on the east end of the dome.
The city council has set a landscape policy prohibiting amur maples- either in tree or shrub form.
As such, the applicant should revise the plan to substitute the amurs with another type of tree.
In- Ground Sprinklers
Section 36 -28 of the city code requires that the developer or owner install an in- ground sprinkler
system for the new landscaped areas. To meet the code, the city should require the county to
install this system around the proposed landscaping and grass areas on the east and south
sides of the dome.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the requests.
2. Table until the county revises its plan by moving the dome north of Aldrich Arena.
3. Table to require a computer- drawing showing how the dome would look on the site.
4. Deny the requests.
4
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Approve the resolution on page 17. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for a
public indoor golf dome on the northwest corner of Van Dyke Street and Ripley Avenue.
The council bases the permit on the findings required by code and it is subject to the
following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The Director of
Community Development may approve minor changes.
2. The county or the contractor must have started the proposed construction within one
year after the council approves this permit or the permit shall end. The city council may
extend this deadline for one year.
3. If the city Council determines there is not enough on -site parking, the council may
require that the property owner or operator provide additional parking.
4. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
B. Approve the resolution on page 19. This resolution approves a 10- foot- setback variance to
build the golf dome on the northwest corner of Ripley Avenue and Van Dyke Street 20 feet
from the Ripley Avenue right -of -way. The city approves this variance based on the following
findings:
1. Strict enforcement of the Code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the property.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
3. The proposed golf dome would be compatible with, the existing and proposed land
uses and zoning.
4. Ramsey County needs the proposed golf dome to improve service to Goodrich Golf
Course users.
5. The proposed golf dome location would not cause any visibility or sight distance
problems.
C. Approve the site plan (received May 17, 1996), the landscape plan (received June 3, 1996)
and building elevations the city received on May 20, 1996 for the Goodrich Golf Dome,
subject to the findings required by the city code. The developer shall do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit:
a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans for the City engineer's
approval. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the city code and with
the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control Handbook.
5
b. Revise the landscape plans for staff approval. This plan shall show:
(1) All deciduous trees at least 2 1/2 inches in caliper, balled and burlapped.
(2) All evergreen trees at least six - feet -tall.
(3) Additional deciduous trees on the west side of the dome.
(4) Different trees than the Amur Maple trees.
c. Submit the following for staff approval:
(1) A revised site plan showing ahard- surfaced sidewalk from the northerly
parking lot to the building entrance. This sidewalk must meet ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements.
(2) A color scheme for the rock -face concrete block entrance building and
revised elevation drawings showing the metal mansard roof on the entire
north and south elevations of the concrete block building. The roof colors
shall also be subject to staff approval.
3. Complete the following before occupying the dome:
a. Install an address on the building.
b. Construct an enclosure as required by city code for all outside dumps #ers
(including those for the arena). The enclosure(s) must match the building color.
Submit plans for the enclosure(s) to staff for approval.
c. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for the landscaped and grass areas between
the dome and Ripley Avenue and between the dome and Van Dyke Street. (Code
requirement)
d. Construct continuous concrete curbing along the south side of the Aldrich Arena
parking lot. (Code requirement)
e. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
f. Sod all turf areas.
g. Install handicap - accessible parking spaces and signs that meet the requirements
of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act).
h. Screen all .roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property.
Submit screening plans to the Design Review Board for approval. (Code
requirement)
Post both sides of the curve on Van Dyke Street north of Ripley Avenue, for no
parking and turn the existing no parking signs so they are perpendicular to the
curb.
j. Post both sides of Ripley Avenue, between White Bear Avenue and North St.
Paul Road, for no parking.
4. Finish striping the Aldrich Arena parking lot between the golf dome and the arena to
meet. code requirements (9.5- foot -wide stalls or 9- foot - wide signed employee stalls ) by
October 1, 1996.
5. Provide at least a 30 -foot setback between the buildings and the property line along
Ripley Avenue and from Van Dyke Street if the council does not approve a setback
variance. (Code requirement) This may require the county to shift the dome to the north.
6. This approval does not include the signs. Signs shall be subject to staff approval.
1 pp
7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community Development may
Y p Y
approve minor changes.
8. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work.
The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
c. The city receives a written agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished
work.
W
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
surveyed owners of the four properties within 350 feet of the proposed Golf Dome site in 1994.
The owners of two of these properties replied. Both owners were against the proposal. In
addition, we also surveyed the 34 property owners on the west side of White Bear Avenue
between Larpenteur and Frost Avenues. Of the 12 who responded, six were for the proposal,
four were against the proposal and two had no comment.
For
1. It is a positive addition to the other recreational facilities in the area and will bring some
revenue into Ramsey County. (Hejny - 1829 White Bear Avenue)
2. A very good idea, everyone whom we talked with would enjoy going there. (Strobel -1849
White Bear Avenue)
3. I would rather see the land left the way it is now -- undeveloped. But for some reason, if
someone feels the need to put something there, it might as well be a golf dome. I think a
golf dome is better than a lot of other things they could put there. (Schaeppi - 1899 White
Bear Avenue)
4. Great —more tax dollars for Maplewood. (Mirsch - Saint Paul)
Against
1. It will block our sign at Perkins and view of the restaurant from White Bear Avenue. Move
the dome to the far west corner. (Tom Cory, Perkins - 1829 North Saint Paul Road)
2. It sounds like an eyesore. It also sounds like an elitist use of taxpayer dollars that the
County could put to better use. Leave it be an open space; we need more open space.
Perhaps put in more trees and some flowers, or plant a prairie there for everyone to
enjoy —not just golfers. (Sturm - 1759 White Bear Avenue)
3. The only concern i would have is increased traffic. (Allhiser - 1799 White Bear Avenue)
4. I don't want to look at it. Make it an outdoor driving range. (Arndt 1783 White Bear Ave)
5. The City of Maplewood and Ramsey County are continually talking and bemoaning the loss
of green grass and open spaces. The grass area along Ripley and White Bear Avenue
makes a good border for the Aldrich Arena area. I am sure that at some future time the strip
along Ripley will be needed for additional parking area for Aldrich Arena activities. An
inflatable dome sure wouldn't add anything to improve the open view of the residences on
White Bear Avenue. The County Fair has indicated its demise at the present location. The
area formerly used as a racetrack and other agricultural activities should now be available.
This area is more or less screened from the residences and traffic on White Bear Avenue
by trees and soil berms. It also adjoins the golf course. (Holt - 1895 White Bear Avenue)
6. Additional commercial projects on east side of White Bear Avenue increases traffic flow for
residential owners. Consideration should be made concerning rezoning west side of White
Bear Avenue for commercial use. (Gustafson -Lake Elmo)
E'1
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 65,920 square feet (1.5 acres)
Existing land use: undeveloped
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Aldrich Arena and parking lot
East: Goodrich Golf Course and parkin lot across Van Dyke g y e Street
South: South China Island, Perkins and bank across Ripley Avenue
West: .Vacant County y
ty property and houses across White Bear Avenue
PLANNING
Land - Use Plan designation: P (park)
Zoning: F (farm residence)
Ordinance requirements:
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may grant a CUP if based on nine findings.
(See' the findings in the resolution on pages 17 and 18.)
Section 25 -70 of the city code req uires that the CDRB make the followin g fi ndings to
approve plans:
�. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship ship to
neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will
not impair
the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not
unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existin or
ments� an � g proposed
developments; d that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with th
p g e
character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious,
orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's
p p
comprehensive municipal Ian. y
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a p p desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aestheticall of
good composition, materials, textures and colors.
9
Findings for Variance Approval
State law requires that. the city council make the following findings to approve a variance from
the zoning code: pp
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
property under consideration.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship ", as used in granting of a ro ert variance, means the in u
property y question cannot be
put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of
the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created .by the landowner, and
the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic
c
considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the ro ert Y
exists under the terms of the ordinance.
p p
PUBLIC SAFETY
The Police Department recommends the following:
1. The applicant should install adequate site lighting for around- the -clock protection.
2. There should be no parking on both sides of Ripley Avenue and Van Dyke Street.
OTHER AGENCIES
The Ramsey County Board approved this proposal in 1994. They have not pp
et approved this
plan in 1996.
Y
p: sec141golfdom2. mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Landscape Plan dated June 3, 1996
5. Maplewood Storm Water System Map
6. Applicant's letter dated May 15, 1996
7. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
8. Setback Variance Resolution
9. Plans stamped May 20, 1996 (separate attachment)
10
Attachment 1
AVE. O
Kn C e ad Lake ��
E—` COPE AVE. t?` '� Z
AVE. --
C.> �n LARK AVE. --i
AVE. �n n ' LAURIE RD.
LAURIE RD. LAURIE ° '
Sihorrood o Z
Z RD w t�
PQ w = W o 1 700
_
SANDH URST AVE. o w U 0 � tr Z
W w 65
8 iii c,� Y CO. RD. 8
M BURKE AVE. o BURKE AVE.
` t; 0 1
DR I DG E AVE. 3: John G1onn
� a•
NT AVE. �- I�
Go
to we Cftjr iio+A
AN I AVE. j HARRIS AVE. W
ROSEWOOD AVE. N.
binhood ,� ROSEWO�i D
RYAN V. AVE. S.
. AVE
RA.VSEY COUNTY
NURSING HOME AND
FAIR GROUNDS
GOODRICH ¢
.
• GOLF
r EDGE EDGEHILL RD.
COURSE P
P J`.
DEMONT AW: , �
c BROOKS
AVE,
� BROOKS
�
w
�
AVE.
.
Z
EL a
��N
SEX
TANT
AVE.
s caono
�
�? �c.•
A
----
....
w 1p
°
P
�. GERVAIS
c�
� - G ERVAI S
V)
G RAN DVi EW
AVE.
z
CT.
VIKING
DR.
x
�•..
3b �
CHERREN AVE
AVE. O
Kn C e ad Lake ��
E—` COPE AVE. t?` '� Z
AVE. --
C.> �n LARK AVE. --i
AVE. �n n ' LAURIE RD.
LAURIE RD. LAURIE ° '
Sihorrood o Z
Z RD w t�
PQ w = W o 1 700
_
SANDH URST AVE. o w U 0 � tr Z
W w 65
8 iii c,� Y CO. RD. 8
M BURKE AVE. o BURKE AVE.
` t; 0 1
DR I DG E AVE. 3: John G1onn
� a•
NT AVE. �- I�
Go
to we Cftjr iio+A
AN I AVE. j HARRIS AVE. W
ROSEWOOD AVE. N.
binhood ,� ROSEWO�i D
RYAN V. AVE. S.
. AVE
RA.VSEY COUNTY
NURSING HOME AND
FAIR GROUNDS
GOODRICH ¢
.
• GOLF
¢� .
COURSE P
P J`.
ALDRICH
z
� S � 45 28
o v SU MW�� AVE' ARENA Y
� G Wakefield
m
>.- '010 �O� Lake � o m 6
vE
65
NOR'
'9
HOLLOWAY
68 19
Hillside
x
Pork
CC
-5 RI PLEY
R. - KINGS
S 0 d
o �
w
m 3 Y
w MCKNIGH
W
M
Li
cc
U
LOCATION MAP
4
N
65
NOR'
'9
HOLLOWAY
68 19
Hillside
x
Pork
CC
-5 RI PLEY
R. - KINGS
S 0 d
o �
w
m 3 Y
w MCKNIGH
W
M
Li
cc
U
LOCATION MAP
4
N
LOCATION MAP
4
N
Owo—
FROST AVE.
�r
�9ir : 'Se
!3
Attachment 2
L6
0i
d�4.
1
1
RA M S E Y COUNTY
NURSING HOME
d
V
9° e
t
_ - Ito
35 ui
051 .
1895 j ) r _ _ RA M s E Y CO v,
5 _
1883 Q /
O
1871 - 1.90 �.
GOODRICH
1 1865 0) RAMSEY OUNTY o
GOLF COURSE
t� X95.97 1 z
�. ALDRICH ARENA m
1855 1) Q
cn. 13 cc 35
x _
7c 090 •
. 49 r
N
8 9
ti
H YMA.
1831 3 �
10
3{
II; HEJNY , � w
i ,
;, ?'.
RENTAL Q o
a w:� ....
Z 8 90 j 0
rJ • ui
�-- _
1805 �5� — - - 00
-- --'� R I P L EY AV E.
-Doc �2es574
z,.00 SOUTH
1798 ° '°� ,4 ` (� { NA
H \? h O ! ! �! v�
=- ? --- IPERKINS {BLAND �
1789 .3 MIDAMERICA BANK � ' p 00,
rj di
+_--- � r 4 t.� a — tea
Ri 14 '> Q
a 5 •
zoo , •�� , � ,�
ti
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
12
h. 3 �
f�
N
Attachment 3
F
r
i
j
i
K ~
i
i
i
!
ALDRICH ARENA
I
I - -
I 1 Otf M
J. 27 10, 40
at-
GO
�' I.: I � •t. 0: � 0 �
r M i • j I Qf 1
Jjoa
'• 1 wl. / '
.IC► v0.. �4
y o re e* M lM Ot
ct -
♦.• . .%r 4r - try Ott.?e
w r w ' Apl
"`. \ `` G '� - - � _ ' —•-----__ _�Y. _._:— ''"`-- =+ter'- - - _. .�.._._.:svraar_ —_— — � � I, —.1K S.. `qtr• i Q• I
Gv
M WA! N' h M pi.7�� �.'10. Wu.v'
RIPLEY go�AVENUE �e �� r.
M
M . vN1�
M 17r. fM.
SITE PLAN
13
5 -77 -96
U
N
h
? r
R i V
p� 3
�P
.1
g a
9�
X
%A i Z 0
Z � W •
J
?s
o I�
a
d
..fig. o
r
> I
t Y�
i t s
16
n rr �r !� r • �t Q -� J. t H rl ,
14
o
of
s
a
a
Attachment 5
. SE�c W
w N
LLJ 0 - :
0 . ,
Co. N i CD
12` - ,J
} `'' � ""` i �^ .► � � is .: /� !a, ht: IJJy ,a: = rftl• •a.) # lt.f � • fY ~ • • q
S ig) i 1 Kam-. ff 1.1 ?y. .j y..s. :1 �•'� r C ♦
y ! } 7 ,1 1 + G!G{ . i•' { �� ! C r •f �� r ' (.y ,, �.. Q' S Ja
,. • , T'1 �. &4,, •� w ..� i., 1. ... �1t a Q r ,,2 t % 1
• I
�. . . '
Y ��• +2 B r
J
� t
. WICKLANOER S o ��.- ,.• t M, _� D
i ! POND =•'k - �, �.,., r .. ;��
f CENTER 5 M AI�.Ew�000 -
` LP 26 = PUBLIC WORKS -,,;�' C. - �:�
0 t ELDRIOGE
1 �i3 t\ ► +.� �' �a 7t; .,.•` aft, Z,
5 24
s C; y C F b r c r �0 4 �' +✓'� /1 v•• ; A► 001KO 0
��, `'� 1911 ! a � 3 A
L 2.415 •.
r -
MUNTY i • // >
• • ' f
'�� �• CITY HALL _�' _ s ... ` .. - - - 5271��� ..: BE' �o�T
9 LP 27A
. s>r± >l.
1
2 f. .LP 278
24 _ ""• "• ttt:s
r r
r TRAIL _ .
LP 27 o
le
5273 t : }
,
3 t r .•.
LP 27 C. J4' c. ♦.f. o.;..
;. �0 5200, •.
6 � LP 28 G 29
/ {
GOOD {
GOLF
T PARK 6
� •'� COURSE of II
,� I
I RAMSEY BLDG. `�` A y •' -'- •' ;::•.
COUNTY '
tL FARM ! ,, � ,= i. , .
W 's VAN Cl KI • yE
NURSING ?zi '` ��' •� ;
a
HOME •,?•• PRIVATE *Y$T .M
• ; - -gip '• — Of �•
I ,f„
MAPLEWOOD STORM WATER SYSTEM
15
4
N
Attachment 6
't
v
L:
Parks and Recreation Department
Gregory A. Mack, Director
2015 N. Van Dyke Street
Maplewood, MN 55109 -3796
May 15, 1996
Ms. Melinda Coleman
Community Development Director
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Ms. Coleman:
Tel: 612 -777 -1707
Fax: 612- 777 - 6519
As requested by the City of Maplewood, this letter identifies the purpose and use of the facility
identified in the Request for a Conditional Use Permit.
Ramsey County (owner of the property) and Midwest Domes are negotiating an agreement that will
'grant Midwest Domes the right to erect a dome structure solely for the purpose of operating a public
golf range facility adjacent to the Goodrich Golf Course. This use shall include apractice /teaching
range and services normally provided in association with the operation of such a facility.
The goal of this facility will be to provide opportunities for golfers at all levels of playing ability to
develop and improve their golfing skills. We believe this project will enhance the quality of life for the
community by providing a year -round recreational facility for its residents. The project complements
other elements within the "recreation corridor," which includes the Maplewood Communi ty Center,
Willard. Munger Gateway State Trail, Goodrich Golf Course, Aldrich Arena and Goodrich Triangle
Park.
If you require further information, or clarification, please call me at 777 -1707. Thank you for your
consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,.,
Gregory A. ck .,
Director
GAM/j j h
16
Minnesota's First Home Rule County
printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10% post - consumer content
AFSCME
:
Attachment 7
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Ramsey County applied for a conditional use permit for a public golf dome.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property on the northwest corner of Van Dyke Street and
Ripley Avenue. The legal description is:
The East 310 feet of the West 625 feet of the South 192 feet of the North 1l2 of the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29, Range 22.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 3, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this permit.
2. On June 24, 1996, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
60 The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
17
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1.
All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The Director of Community
Development may approve minor changes.
2. The county or the contractor must have started the proposed construction within one year
after the council approves this permit or the permit shall end. The city council may extend
this deadline for one year.
3. If the city council determines there is not enough on -site parking, the council may require
that the property owner or operator provide additional parking.
4. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on June , 1996.
18
Attachment 8
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Greg Mack, of the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department, applied for
a variance from the zoning ordinance.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to property on the northwest corner of Ripley Avenue and
Van Dyke Street. The legal description is:
The East 310 feet of the West 625 feet of the South 192 feet of the North 1/2 of the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29, Range 22.
WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c)(c) of the Maplewood City Code requires a 30 -foot setback for
buildings from a street right -of -way.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 20 -foot building setback from the Ripley Avenue right -
of -way.
WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 10 feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On June 3, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this variance.
2.. The city council held a public hearing on June 24, 1996. City staff published a notice in
the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required
by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present
written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the
city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
variance for the following reasons:
1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the property.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
3. The proposed golf dome would be compatible with the existing and proposed land uses
and zoning.
4. Ramsey County needs the proposed golf dome to improve service to Goodrich Golf
Course users.
5. The proposed golf dome location would not cause any visibility or sight distance
problems.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1 1996.
19
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 06 -03 -96
B. Goodrich Golf Dome Conditional Use Permit -- Ripley Avenue and Van Dyke Street
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. A revised landscape plan with some
additional information, received June 3, 1996, was given to the commissioners. Mr. Roberts
answered questions from the commission. Commissioner Axdahl commented about a statement
in the staff report that the council denied the previous request for this golf dome based on findings
in the city code. He asked what changes had been made in the city code that would affect this
project. Mr. Roberts said the city attorney thought there was enough subjectivity in the findings
for approval, or denial, for the city to now approve the requested dome.
Commissioner Fischer asked staff to comment on the recommendation for a 30 -foot setback
requirement (contained in the new information distributed at the meeting regarding
Recommendation B. 5.). The conditions, as approved by the Community Design Review Board,
recommend a 30 -foot setback, as code requires. As shown on the plans, the building would have
a (f}- foot setback from the Ripley Avenue right -of -way. Gregory Mack, director of the
Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department, is now requesting a 20- foot - setback from the
.Ripley Avenue right -of -way. This would leave some separation between the dome and the south
edge of the existing parking lot.
Mr. Roberts said the city did not see any problem with this request. He added that attention will
be given to the Community Design Review Board conditions to satisfy both the city and the
Ramsey County parks department. Kevin Finley, of the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation
Department, was present and offered to answer questions. Fred Paul of Midwest Domes, the
contractor and manager of the proposed dome, also was at the meeting.
Commissioner Frost asked if this dome would be similar to the one in Cottage Grove.
Mr. Finley said this dome is like the one in Cottage Grove that has come down twice in the last
three to four years. Mr. Paul said the manufacturer is now using a new cable system to support
the dome during times of high wind shear.
Nancy Peterson, 1990 Ripley Avenue (across from Goodrich Park), spoke about a possible plan
by Ramsey County to use Goodrich Park as an outdoor driving range. She felt this was not an
appropriate use for that area and said the neighborhood needed a typical park there. There also
would be a need by Maplewood to relocate the balifields, presently at Goodrich, with a substantial
cost to the taxpayers. Ms. Peterson's concern was to look at this as more than a golf dome —it is
an opportunity to provide Maplewood with seven large parks. Ms. Peterson also asked if it was
necessary to have the dome 65 feet tall with two levels. Mr. Finely said the height was required.
Carolyn Peterson, 1999 Jackson Street, recommended building the golf dome at Ripley and
VanDyke.
Greg Mack, the Ramsey County Parks director, said there has been discussion with the
Maplewood City Council and the Ramsey County board about conveyance of 7 properties, now
owned by Ramsey County, to Maplewood, subject to the county receiving a conditional use permit
and, building permit for this golf dome. These parcels comprise 144 acres of land, most of which
the city has had under long -term lease. Mr. Mack said there would be a restriction in the
conveyance that all lands being transferred to Maplewood are to remain as either park or open
space.
L1
Planning Commission -5-
Minutes of 06 -03 -96
Commissioner Frost asked Mr. Mack for an update on the north and south extensions of the
pedestrian /bike trail that runs from Frost Avenue to Beam Avenue. Commissioner Fischer spoke p e about a
bush that interferes with site distance on the trail south of County Road 6 at the intersection of 6th Street.
This was determined to be on the Department of Natural Resources Gateway trail.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Approve the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a public indoor g olf dome
on the northwest comer of Van Dyke Street. and Ripley Avenue. The council bases the
permit on the findings required by code and it is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The Director of
Community Development may approve minor changes.
2. The county or the contractor must have started the pro osed construction within one
e
year after thecouncil approves this permit or the permit shall end. The city council
may extend this deadline for one year.
3. If the city council determines there is not enough on -site parking, the council may
require that the property owner or operator provide additional parking.
4. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Approve a setback variance from 30 feet to 20 feet off Ripley Street for the dome.
Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes— Axdahl, Rossbach, Frost, Brue eman
99 ,
Ericson
Nays — Fischer
LIM
The motion passed.
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JUNE 11, 1996
V1. DESIGN REVIEW
A. Ramsey County Golf Dome, Ripley Avenue South of Aldrich Arena
'Kevin Finley, of the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department, was present. Mr.
Finley said they agreed to the recommendations in the staff report. Secretary Ekstrand gave
some background information on the project. Mr. Finley explained the plantings on the site -
plan drawing. He said the trees shown on the plan are not in addition to the 20 trees that
were planted in the last two years on Ripley Avenue between White Bear Avenue and Van
Dyke Street. Evergreen trees will be planted immediately est of the dome and also
Y up
towards White Bear Avenue. The Amur maples,. shorn on the plan, will be changed to
another type of deciduous tree. Mr. Finley said the facility would have only vending machines
and that retail sales of any golfing equipment would be at the Goodrich Golf Course.
Boardmember Erickson was concerned about sidewalk access to the front of the building.
9
Mr. Finley said the mansard would be teal blue, to match Aldrich Arena. The rock -face block
would be gray. Fred Paul, of Midwest Domes, described the airlock that o rovides access
P t
the dome from the small building to the east, as being constructed of the same fabric as the
Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes of 06- 11 -9.5
dome and approximately 14 feet high by 14 feet wide by 20 feet long. Mr. Paul said the area
would be large enough to hold a small truck and would be used to provide services to the.
dome and for handicap access.- Boardmember Robinson asked about the possibility of
having the block of the building a cream color to match Aldrich Arena, rather than gray.
Secretary Ekstrand recommended that the block be colored and the mansard be wrapped on
both end elevations. Mr. Ekstrand also said a hard- surface, access walk should be made
available from the north parking lot to the front door.
Mr. Paul agreed that a walkway was needed and mentioned the expense of extending the
mansard. He was most concerned about the requirement of having colored block and did not
agree with this.. Chairperson Erickson said the plans were not complete, and suggested that
the developer have a color scheme before the proposal is presented to the city council.
Boardmember Robinson moved the Community Design Review Board recommend:
C. Approve the site plan (received May 17, 1996), the landscape plan (received June 3,
1996) and building elevations the city received on May 20, 1996 for the Goodrich Golf
Dome, subject to the findings required by the city code. The developer shall do the
following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit
for this project.
2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit:
a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans for the city
engineer's approval. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the city
code and with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion
Control Handbook.
b. Revise the landscape plans for staff approval. This plan shall show:
(1) All deciduous trees at least 2 1/2 inches in caliper, balled and burlapped.
(2) All evergreen trees at least six - feet -tall.
(3) Additional deciduous trees on the west side of the dome.
(4) Different trees than the Amur Maple trees.
c. Submit the following for staff approval:
(1) A revised site plan showing ahard- surtaced sidewalk from the northerly
parking lot to the building entrance. This sidewalk must meet ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements.
(2) A color scheme for the rock -face concrete block entrance building and
revised elevation drawings showing the metal mansard roof also on the
entire north and south elevations of the concrete block building. The roof
colors shall also be subject to staff approval.
Community Design Review Board -3-
Minutes of 06 -11 -95
3. Complete the following before occupying the dome:
a. Install an address on the building.
b. Construct an enclosure as required by city code for all outside dumpsters
(including those for the arena). The enclosure(s) must match the building
color. Submit plans for the enclosure(s) to staff for approval.
c. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for the landscaped and grass areas
between the dome and Ripley Avenue and between the dome and Van Dyke
Street. (Code requirement)
d. Construct continuous concrete curbing along the south side of the Aldrich
Arena parking lot. (Code requirement)
e. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
f. Sod all turf areas.
g. Install handicap - accessible parking spaces and signs that meet the
requirements of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act).
h. Screen all roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property.
Submit screening plans to the Design Review Board for approval. (Code
requirement)
. Post both sides of the curve on Van Dyke Street, north of Ripley Avenue, for
no parking and turn the existing no parking signs so they are perpendicular to
the curb.
j. Post both sides of Ripley Avenue, between White Bear Avenue and North St.
Paul Road, for no parking.
k. Add a hard - surface sidewalk, to meet ADA standards, from the north parking
lot to the front entrance of the dome.
Colored rock -face block, other than concrete -gray block, subject to staff
review, is to be used on the entrance building. The mansard is to be
wrapped around the three visible sides of the entrance building.
m. All colors are subject to staff review.
4. Finish striping the Aldrich Arena parking lot between the golf dome and the arena to
meet code requirements (9.5- foot -wide stalls or 9- foot -wide signed employee stalls) by
October 1, 1996.
5. Provide at least a 30 -foot setback between the buildings and the property Fine along
Ripley Avenue and from Van Dyke Street if the council does not approve a setback
Community Design Review Board -4-
Minutes of 06 -11 -95
variance. (Code requirement) This may require the county to shift the dome to the
north.
6. This approval does not include the signs. All signage shall be subject to staff
approval.
7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community Development may
approve minor changes.
8. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
.b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work.
The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
c. The city receives a written agreement that will allow the city to complete any
unfinished work.
Boardmember Berggren seconded. Ayes --all
5 S
TO: all the members of the Maplewood City un
Mayor Gary Bastian Dale Carlson eorge Rossbach
Sherry Allenspach Marvin Koppen
We, the residents of Maplewood wear Goodrich park, empress
our support of the proposed Goff Dome to be built next to
Aldrich Arena.
We support the Dome for the following reasons:
1. Building the Golf Dome provides Ramsey County with their desired
driving range facility and does not use the Goodrich Triangle land for an
outdoor range, thereby taking away a city softball program and a community
park.
2. By Ramsey County not needing Goodrich Park as a driving range
facility, and turning it over to Maplewood ownership, Maplewood need not
spend $1 million +dollars to move their softball program elsewhere.
3. In making Goodrich park a Maplewood park, it preserves this only open
space to the residents who live near it.
4. Keeping Goodrich parr as a Maplewood park fits Maplewood's park
board goal of "a park for each mile radius ".
5. The Golf Dome next to Aldrich Arena and adjacent to Goodrich Golf
Course serves the county and community's need for more recreation while
disrupting the fewest number of residents and programs in this location.
Signatures and Addresses in support of the Golf Dome on White Bear Ave.
V
.r.
�z � 1
��Z 2 Pct' Y uE
400r, Ar
ova— LA," s �. c .�� Iq 3 c) l �c� �w� -�
�e'S�Ahn �L ��� �d � �1�Ea� �4 flu L .
, e-mjM
wL
kofk /-
`
�a�
�w IST
� ad
-C �
1 �$�
P2 ,A,�
Mar«woOD
or
���..e�,
��310
��w �Ive. u9�.�
"4 /v< ??Z!�
�y���
� d� /j�Lty
M1�f�L�L -shy
`'� �
!�
Li i)(PJ4
id'lQ �I,C�O C�
j
�z � 1
��Z 2 Pct' Y uE
400r, Ar
ova— LA," s �. c .�� Iq 3 c) l �c� �w� -�
�e'S�Ahn �L ��� �d � �1�Ea� �4 flu L .
, e-mjM
wL
1
e
s
H
u
Sr
ku�
a R�i
&..' I
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Action by CounollA :.^
Endorses,,
Mods fie
R e j 0 - ate
City Manager Date
Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit, Parking Reduction Authorization and Design
Review
PROJECT: MDG Properties Building
LOCATION: Cope Avenue, east of the Ramsey County Trail
DATE: June 17, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Mike McGrath and Gary May are proposing to build a 37,000- square -foot office /warehouse/
manufacturing facility on Cope Avenue east of the Ramsey County Trail and Corner Kick Soccer
Center. Refer to the maps on pages 9 and 10. The proposed building would be constructed of
precast concrete panels and brick and would be 22 feet tall. Refer to the site plan on page 11
(this-is the applicants original plan), the revised site plan on page 12 (this is the applicant's
revised plan incorporating parking lot changes after the planning commission's .review , the
letters of explanation on pages 14 and 15 and the building elevations (separate attachment).
The tenants would use parts of this building for the fabrication and storage of metal roofing
materials. They also would use the building for clothing storage and distribution. Mr. McGrath
said that there, would not be any outside storage of materials.
The applicants have a grading and fill permit and are preparing the site for development.
Requests
The applicants are requesting the following:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) because the addition would be 72 feet from the residential
district to the south (the center of Cope Avenue). Code requires a CUP for buildings in a
M -1 (light manufacturing) district that would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district.
2. Approval of plans.
City staff also is recommending that the city approve a parking reduction authorization, as
recommended by the planning commission.
BACKGROUND
On May 28, 1996, the community design review board (CDRB) approved the design plans. Refer
to the attached minutes. The CDRB recommended additional brick on the building. Refer to the
revised plans (separate attachment).
On June 3, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city approve the conditional
use permit and the parking reduction authorization. Refer to the attached minutes.
DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit
As proposed, the building, with its office, storage and manufacturing uses, conforms with the
requirements of the M -1. district. However, the issue is what. safeguards should the city re
g tY uire q
to protect the residential neighbors because of the building's proximity to the residential district.
The main concern that the neighbors expressed was about traffic to and from this site.
Mr. McGrath told me that all deliveries would take place durin normal business hours Monday
Y
through Friday from 7 a.m. to 5 p.rn Deliveries would be by trucks ranging from pickup trucks
to .one -ton (gross vehicle weight) trucks. There would be a semi- truck delive ry about once a
week. They are not open evenings or weekends.
Several neighbors said that there is already too much traffic on Cope Avenue for a residential
neighborhood. Maplewood has classified Cope Avenue as a minor arterial roadway in the
comprehensive plan. Minor arterials are commercial -grade roadways intended to connect
collector streets (neighborhood streets) with mayor arterial roadways. Maplewood intends minor
collector roadways to carry 7,000 plus vehicle trips per day. The traffic count on this part of
Cope Avenue shows that there are currently 2,808 vehicle trips.per day in a 24 -ho.ur period.
Parking
The applicants revised the site plan as the planning recommended with 30 fewer parking spaces
than the original proposal. City staff is recommending that the city council approve a parking
reduction authorization of up t0 30 fewer spaces for the building. The owner /operator told us that
the tenants /partners that will be in the building have a total of :about 40 employees. As proposed,
Y p p ,
the plans show at least 82 parking spaces on the site. If the city allows the developer to have 30
fewer parking spaces, there still should be enough parking on the site for the tenants. In
addition, having fewer parking spaces will allow the developer to build less retaining all on the
g
west side of the site near the Ramsey County Trail. This should allow for more gentle grading
and more green area next to the trail.
2
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 16 -18. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for
a building in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district to be closer than 350 feet to a residential
district. The city bases the approval on the findings required by code and is subject to the
following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city.
Y
2. The city council may require additional parking in the future if the council determines that
there is a need for additional parking on the site.
3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within One ear of council
y ouncil
approval or the permit shall become . null and void. The council may extend this d
for one year.
Y deadline
4. The city council shall review this.permit in one year.
5. There shall be n0 outdoor storage of any materials or equipment without approval p pp of a
revised conditional use permit by the city council.
B. Approve a parking reduction authorization of u t '
p o 30 fewer parking spaces for the MDG
.properties building on Cope Avenue. The city approves this arkin reduction because p g se the
tenants in the building have areas of assembly and warehousing that need fewer employees
p yees
and parking than other commercial -buildings. The City council may require uire the
owner /Operator to add more on -site parking if the city council determines that there is
a
shortage of parking on the site.
C. Approve the plans (stamped June 17, 1996) for the MDG Properties building g on Cope
Avenue, subject to the findings ; required by the code. The property owner shall:
p Y
1. Repeat this review in two ears if the city has no i •
Y y t issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Provide the following for staff approval before the city ssues a building permit:
Y gp : t
a. A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control Ian to the i '
t p city engineer for approval.
The erosion control plan shall comply with ordinance re uirements.
q
b. A lawn- irrigation plan for all landscaped areas showing the '
p g e iocatiOn of sprinkler
heads.
c. A certificate of survey of the property.
d. A revised landscape plan providing sod instead of seed for the
Highway 36 frontage,
the Cope Avenue frontage and along the side lot lines a distance of 100 feet from the
south property line.
e. A revised site plan providing for site - security lighting.
3
3. Complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
b. Restore and sod - damaged boulevards.
c. Install handicap - parking .signs for each, handicap- parking space and an address on
the building. Each tenant shall also be identified for public safety ur
Y oses. p
d. Screen all roof- mounted equipment visible from streets or . adjacent pro pert
y.
p p Y
e. Construct trash dumpster enclosure if there will be any outdoor storage of refuse.
The enclosures must match the building in color and materials. There must be a
closeable gate that is 100 % opaque.
f. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
4
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
i surveyed owners of the 27 properties within 350 feet of this site. Of the nine replies, two were
in favor and seven objected.
In Favor
1. Good use of property. (Meyer, 2493 Orchard Lane, White Bear Lake)
2. It is congruent with existing structures on north side of Cope. (Doll, 2255 Ide Court)
opposed
1. I object because of the increased traffic, including truck traffic that would cause a problem for
no and also for the increased hazard to walk and bike traffic on the trail. I don't believe
there should be any more commercial development in this area with the residential so close
and because of the proximity to the trail. It would spoil that portion of the trail which I use all
the time. I would like to see a park —type area with benches, trees and maybe a fountain.
This would make a nice resting spot along the trail for families, etc. Thank you. (Sturm,
2251 Ide Court)
2. It would increase traffic volume on Cope.. Not just volume but the people who drive
Cope —drive way too fast. No one drives the speed limit and you take your life in your hands
just crossing the street to get your mail. I would like to see the building set back from Cope
also for esthetic reasons. (Kruchowski, 1410 Cope Avenue)
3. We already have enough traffic going through this neighborhood living by the state trail. This
is a residential district we don't need the added noise. Professional offices would be OK. A
warehouse is not acceptable because of the large trucks going in and out at all hours of the
night. Also the size of vehicles like a semi should not be going on residential streets.
(Stepnick, 2250 Ide Court)
4. High truck traffic. An office building would be ok (cars only). It would be better if you could
have trucks and cars using Highway 36 as entrance instead of Cope Avenue. Too many
children using the new bike and foot pathway. Also a lot of trucks from Nemis Newman
Company already and heavy traffic from soccer center. (Cardenas, 2261 Birmingham
Street)
5. Creates more traffic, less trees for viewing, trees are better than concrete any way you look
at it. Plant huge trees so we can't see the building. Plus, buy residents trees to plant in front
of their houses. (Sanada, 1404 Cope Avenue)
6. a) Depreciates value of homes; b) Also too much traffic with soccer club and noise not
controlled well. Establish senior residences instead. Should a service road parallel
with Highway 36 to eliminate some of this traffic. (Nelson, 1356 Cope Avenue)
5
7. Cope Avenue already has a lot of traffic the additional traffic would be too - much. We moved
to Cope Avenue in January of this year.. Cope Avenue is a heavily traveled street with no
sidewalks for people walking. We feel that 20 trucks driving in and out would be too much
noise as well as a danger to the people in our neighborhood. Many people walk down Cope
to get to the walking trails, for some children it is their only route to Weaver Elementary
School.
We feel abuilding /warehouse without so much traffic would be ok. The Nimis Newman
building is a perfect example of an acceptable amount of traffic We hope you can take our
thoughts and children into consideration when making your decision. Thank you. (Steele,
.1392 Cope Avenue)
C�
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 2.61 acres
Existing land use: undeveloped
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Highway 36
South: Cope Avenue and single dwellings
West: A paved bicycle /pedestrian trail and the Corner Kick Soccer Center
Fast: Nimis' Newman, Goldstar and MN Granite
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: M -1 (light manufacturing)
Zoning: M -1
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36- 187(b) states that no building or exterior use, except parking, may be erected, altered
or constructed within 350 feet of a residential district without a CUP.
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council must base approval of a CUP on nine standards for
approval. Refer to findings one through nine in the resolution on pages 15 -17.
Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve
plans:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to
neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the
desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably
interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or .proposed developments; and
that is will not create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of
the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and
attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal
plan.
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good
composition, materials, textures and colors.
7
PUBLIC SAFETY
The developer should provide:
1. Adequate lighting between 1400 Highway 36 and the proposed building.
2. Lighting for the parking lot in all darkened hours.
3 Proper signing and /or identification for each business.
p:sec101mcgrath.cup
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Site Plan (original submittal)
4. Site Plan Revision (showing the reduction in parking spaces)
5. Building Elevation Reductions (with additional brick as recommended by the CDRB)
6. Applicant's letter dated April 18, 1996
7. Letter from Douglas A. Moe dated April 17, 1996
8. Resolution
9. Plans date- stamped April 22, 1996 (separate attachment)
10.. Revised plans date- stamped June 17, 1996 (separate attachment)
Attachment 1
Q- KOHLMAN AVE. v w KOHLMAN
HoMood W 0 AVE.
z Z
COUNTY ROAD C w w 23 3
g
�. C -� o
PALM �� t, i W z W Cv ' N EH/ v
CT. PALM cn D a 4 '
5 3 ° Cr z EDGEHILL RD. {
N� CON NOR S W
CONNOR C� AVE• � 0 DEMONT AVE.
CT. MOt4T AVE. O AVE.
�n BROOKS AVE ��OKS N
W , Q AVE. I
w o eRCAKS �^ SEX TANT z o1
H Four
CT. Q AVE. M Q z Pte'
,(\ SEXTANT AVE. w � � g
GE � AIS GERVAIS w Q GERVAIS
�Q N DVI EW AVE. z CT.
00
pp A N G DR.
La �e
• SHERRE AVE. F CAST
•,.,.•.
K LEU
�e, a d Lake
COP COPE AVE. CO
LARK g CT. W A C7 c LARK Q AVE. a
6� .Keller / � o Q _ �' � �. t; N � �
w Lake CO. RD. cm v LA RD. o LAURIE Z RD.
i o _ = SAND URST AVE. o w
` w 2
J� �� } JUNCTION AVE. �' z B Y CO. RD. 65 > B
BU C7. / �Q Pork � a B(/ � � RKE O Con�mw,
AV MOP4~ RKE AVE. m Bu AVE. ® BURKE AVE. c.nt�r
Park � (1) CHAMBERS ST o C �) g It
AV ELDR IDGE AVE. 3 JOhn GiOnn
LN • W O 64
v RSE iii pYE• 1 BELMONT AVE.
GOLF CO K = Gotewo City H011 S
R ILL Av E. SKILL MAN AVE. HARRIS KEL LE S
(ENW 000 ? SHE ROSEWOOD AVE. N.
• �, -� RobkO) od ROSEWO D RAMSEY C
D RYAS v P ' 0 ' t ` RY AN AV. Q AVE. S. NU FAIR GROI
Q AVE • w Q� �' �J
� nkmk 4 z C
p0f*
Off
i
}
27 FROST = $ w LA AVE. G00
ALDRICH , GC
a.
w FE NTON AVE z ® >' 45 @ Zj � COI,
62 o Q z N U MMER
Uj AV E. v Su MvMA AVE. ARENA
Q 3 w o o
3 GOR DO �K FRISBIE AVE. a Q z
Sy 0� o RIP LEY
CC
w o: w G Wak eld Z 0
�--- SO PH IA o o m Lake z o M �n K
�n � -o
Round
�~ _�' p� z � v = SO H(A AVE � ti � W ; � E w w N p;
L ak Lake V) z �J x # _ <
-u 4 w PRICE P •
Phalen �.- z O z C3O
o Q W n Q
Q
LOCATION MAP
9 N
J 1 1
o `20) -`
3�
0
A /
5J �
t .♦ 1
I t 8 2.4 z o o -
� • ln
� N
1.3 3L � 1
p � 3•
+
1 0
r
ct
F Z
V ' W
0
i
j � x
Q
CL
w
Attachment 2
(19 �, ► -
U
1
W
1
� 2
R - w - s
C\j \ HIGHWAY 36 ►
�T 10 ® _
i i ° 2 39 ac• �_ s� �•• - ec
:.:. :::: :::... z 3 .3 �co� ,1439 , 54
7� c 2315
• :::; ... •: 3
-2- 1
f :..::.:.: : :.::.: ::...:.�:::: :.. 2305 L
r 3 ! PROPOSED: U . s
I ••
� ► � , ��� SITE ��:�' ;-+ .•�� +
• :•..• ; .; • •; : • I vi
, . :.:::.:: . :'::::•::•::::::•:.::::.•:: ::. ! 2297 J -
..:......... .; ....::....: :.
CORNER KICK • ::::.•::. :::.• ::: :: : ::: : :: • ::.::'•::::... V
..
NIMIS NEWMAN VISA,
CC
AR,
S) �,
SOCCER CENTER. :::..:::::::::. : :•: : :.:• :. :.:.• .:.:.:..::..... .38 z
....... CL41 i N
�i•:�: ::: •::;',•r:• :• ::::;:: ; •; ::
x ' MN GRANITE W
_ - z 4 = :..:::•::.::..:•:,.: :::....::; . ;.. v 1431
A um in
J ::. :•. • ::• : ::::' :.' '
1 ,• s'+ l S 7 +1 rr1
135fi- ! e9
1318 358 F 1378 1384 - 1392 35 -
1404 �1410� 11420 1 1428
1 S 4 -• �� ;r Q i
ion
7
C A ! t i ► t 3
Q
124) z
�r o 1 ►. 1� 19 D L O 21 22 23
�� ,► � �8 o I y 0191 ,{ / 1T — 8j „
�b 5 J � ' 9 7, , �•' ,' \ z q (12.1 ) CD 1 9
� 1 4 4 e 4 ., ,
:-7-1 �q o LA R K
N ^ 20 X24 6 I V 1w. 446
In 14o (124)
h .J 7 V 117 2 i 3 Z 1 �"t b 14 13 ' 2 1 t t 0 M)
-
1 14 5 a i j C 1 t n �'-- j t !) •
.40 i r q g•,;
�
I \b 1 2 48. (o 7 j �� p G 23': 24 : S 1 18 19 20 21 22' 23
h 5
Jf
1 c�
54
r
r �p
1 s-8 1 l 1 1 ' ^ I 'Z
14S. 7 a ! 7 /�
114 c. .
C . .
PROPERTY LINE I ZONING MAP
io
:`
4
N
Attachment 3
L C _ r _ - _ - - - � __ -•_ _wr,r r_ -•wsrr rr..r •.. •. •ww.rwrr�
.+� W .i L,0 1+ •w��•�.��. -r•r �•r �•..�r r�-•� ••• I__- _��•�.� �. _. r ��r• �� ��•r r. w,.��w. ���
I '
1
Tor 1 � l 1 1• j � is�• iv' « � !
, 1 .� AiTP►11,11M0 rev � f! �•• � .� ! r�� �' •;'• ' 1 1
Vie,, i i ! 1 ''.''. ����== �� f� = �,._. • 1 1 t 1
�! ' :' - - 1,t • NIMIS NEWMAN MECHANICAL
0 .�o. .�..• , , ! ! ; ,.: 1 1► • GOLDSTAR M OULDING
T. T'r'0"" ; , ': ' '�'• , ; • MN GRANITE & MARBLE
! •. :: .
V�.If1�p 1 ! •• • .' L.L.• :.• . •/ �.•�••.;.• •': "�,
PROPOSED • � 1
! 1 ' BUILDING *4
Pro
1 � e •'t�:i�s:' ;t wrwe ag eMacy, s•v •. ►`. 1 !
! '• ?• ��!!. .••:. 7500 fF 4.000 !I
Iry
If
• pdM • NM MA
Apo
w wr.IwO.iZ „ - L " rM ywH
' COPE AVE,
DATA
SITE AREA
0.61 .A.
BUILDING AREA
OFFICE
10,500 SF
MANUFACTURING
2,000 SF
WAREHOUSE
24,500 Sr
TOTAL
37,050 SF
PARKING REQUIRED
'
OFFICE 1 1/200 SF
52.S CARS
MANUFACTURING 1 1/400
S.0 CARS
WAREHOUSE 1 i /1000 SF
24.5 CARS.
i
82.0 CARS
PARKING PROVIDED
82.0 CARS
LANDSCAPING
KEY QTY. NAME
SIZE
ROOT
NM S MORNAY MAPLE
2 -1/2"
BAB
AP 15 AUSTRIAN PINE
6' •
B&B
AM 20 AMUR MAPLE
18"
POT
BP 8 BLUE PFITZER
18"
POT
SITE PLAN
11
Q
N
6 __= =1 - - I — " c< -- ".. I I __ � -11, in mmilmmmm
0-4
N)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
YO
,et. SP&O
pea* "@A...-
41 1.
L i P
-y-n
J%
-00 vbwow� vvp -mov 1 4 1 1
94OV-4-
obv"04'r d"r vu%64- 1 1
r4p so '080APISM
=nv
L'odow ow
00
Mop
fe
may
Jr
41
whom = 1 .0,0 064W wvwm&4
ps AP O rnnll
ro
COPE AVE.- dW,"
SITE PLAN
DATA
fITI AREA
2.61 A.
BUIWING AREA
2 a&&
orricit
9,600 SF
MANUFACTURING
21000 sr
WARENGUZZ
251320 Sr
u7Fy6
PARKING PROVIDED
52 CARS
LANDSCAPING
WIN 7 NORWAY HAP"
2 a&&
AP 2s AUSTRIAN PINK
6. 098
asc is RED SPLENDOR CRAM
2-1120 "a
ar 16 at-Ur ]PPITUR
low POT
-an >
C+
C+
JUN 17 1996 � i
C+
" � '0--ism-0 Wv wwmwwvpo
�Z��:sed s:� PI�,J
r
!
10
ul
cc
Ul
IL
0
cc
i CL
i ca
( i i 111
y�;
W
ulnn►Illu� ww�+w�wMrw►twaiwwww
mnii��i��m�im
pw
M ill
NORTH ELEVATION
MM11111 — 2 .. 1I11111111IIN1111 ......
I�IIIII{ in1�111n1i {III�(illill
Nlll111i1
- 111 ■SS �S'"
4 1)- o1wholso OR-dim
EAST
Y i
�. Ul
JUN 17 19%
UL
{
k
1
E
Itt 1 � i
flu
I
_ Ic
0
Q V {
SOUTH <
f
�y
!s
t
W'
..I
H
Q
W
CL
O
w
0 .
C+
C+
0
ss
=3 of E
C+
. CT1
1
.1
z
WEST
1 /,r. M ,.��.
Me Do 6. PARTNE_P,�SHIP., LoLoPe
2448 LARPENTEUR AVENUE W
ST PAUL, MN 55113 Attachment
612 - 641 -0300 612 -641 -0300 (fax)
April 18, 1996
City of Maplewood
183 0. E County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: INTENTED USE MDG PARTNERSHIP PROPERTY
COPE AVE, MAPLEWOOD
we propose construction of a 37,000 SF office
warehouse located between the Corner Kick Soccer Facility
and Nemis Newman Company, on Cope Avenue.. There would be
approximately 8000 SF of office with 17,000 SF of warehouse
for one tennant located in the north portion of the
building. The remaining 12,000 SF would consist of 2,500
SF of office, 2000 SF of manufacturing and 7,500 SF of
warehouse. The total facility would house approximately 40
employees with minimal visitor traffic. Material
deliveries would consist of 12 to 20 truck trips per day
with occasiona over the road truck deliveries. The
routine traffic would be f rom passenger vehicles and 24 ft
delivery trucks.
The facility would be consistent with the current
industrial Zoning of the property and is similar in use to
the building bordering the east property line. The
proposed building will provide an additional buffer between
highway 36 and the re sidential property south of Cope
Avenue. we feel operation of the facility would have no
negative impact on the neighborhood, and will provide an
astatically pleasing addition to both Highway 36 and Cope
Avenue Frontage Road.
For the above reasons, we request that the City of
Maplewood approve our request for both the design and
conditional use permit.
Also, attached is the general description of the above
proj from our architect.
Sincerely,
Mike McGrath
MG Partnership LLP
14
•. .hip. . nn,
� 4 R
1
APR 2Z1996 1 1
JE ARCHITECTS PHONE hC. +612 441 5469 Apr, 1? 1996 03 :13PM P1
• DOUGLAS A. MOE Attachment -7
.. ARCHITECTS
INOORPORATED
10484 Vale Street
Elk River, Minnesala 66380
{610) 44165460
. April 17_, 1996
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road 8
Maplewood, MN . 55109
Res MDG Properties -- Mapl.awood, . MN.
To Whom it may concern:
Following is a general description of the above project;
The 2.61 acre site fronts Copy Avenue and is bordered on
the west by the abandoned Burlington Norther. n Railroad R.O. w .
and on the east by Iimi s Newman Mechanical .and Minnesota
Granite and Marble office--warehouse. The buffer of existing
trees on the west and south property l i nes , if practical and
desired by the City, could ba saved and supplemented by the
plantings shown on the drawings.
The intended use of the property is an office-warehouse struc-
ture of 37,000 square feet with offices can the. north and south
ands-and a loading area on the west side.
The height of the building is approximately 22 feet plus a
Parapet. at each office area to screen rooftop equipmont, mat..
erials are to be ribbed precast concrete wall plaLnk, face brick,
and metal panels* colors to be earth tones.
The above project does not involve any procoss, activity, mat -
erial, equipment or method of operation that would be dangerous,
hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nul same to any
person or property*
Sincerely,
u s A. Moe
i
APR 2 2 1996
15
Attachment 8
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Michael McGrath and Gary May applied for a conditional use permit to build a
37,000 - square -foot building in a M -1 (light manufacturing) district closer than 350 feet. to a
residential district.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property to the east of 1357 Cope Avenue. The legal
description is:
THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22,
EXCEPT THE EAST 39 ACRES, EXCEPT THAT PART LYING WEST OF THE EASTERLY
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, AND EXCEPT THAT
PART LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF HIGHWAY NO. 36
AS NOW LOCATED:
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 10, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG
THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 A DISTANCE OF 848.3 FEET TO THE
INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO.
36, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE A
DISTANCE OF 1196.20 FEET, THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE LEFT 90 DEGREES AND
ALONG THE SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 25 FEET, THENCE
DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 90 DEGREES AND ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE A
DISTANCE OF 93.46 FEET TO AN IRON, SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF
WEST LINE OF THE EAST 39 ACRES AND THE SAID TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 36
SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY
LINE A DISTANCE OF 233.30 FEET, THENCE SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE
WEST LINE OF THE EAST 39 ACRES A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE SAME LINE A DISTANCE OF 169.15
FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SAID SOUTH LINE
A DISTANCE OF 233.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SAID EAST 39
ACRES, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 188.86
FEET, THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY
LINE A DISTANCE OF 233.30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AND
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 10, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG
THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 A DISTANCE OF 848.3 FEET TO THE
INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO.
36, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE A
DISTANCE OF 1196.20 FEET, THENCE DEFLECTING TO THE LEFT 90 DEGREES AND
ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 25 FEET, THENCE DEFLECTING
TO THE RIGHT 90 DEGREES AND ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF
16
93.46 FEET TO AN IRON, SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF WEST LINE OF
THE EAST 39 ACRES AND THE SAID TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 36 SOUTHERLY RIGHT -
OF -WAY LINE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID
RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 233.30 FEET, THENCE SOUTHERLY AND
PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 39 ACRES A DISTANCE OF 250.00
FEET, THENCE EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY
LINE A DISTANCE OF 233.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 39
ACRES, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 250 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 3, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this permit.
2. The city council held a public hearing on June 24, 1996. City staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
conditional use permit, because:
1 The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2.. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
17
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city.
2. The city council may require additional parking in the future if the council determines that
there is a need. for additional parking on the site.
3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
.approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
4. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
5. There shall be. no outdoor storage of any materials or equipment without approval of a
revised conditional use permit by the city council.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1996.
18
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JUNE 3 1996
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. MDG OfficeMarehouse Building Conditional Use Permit- --Cope Avenue
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Ericson was
concerned about the speed limit for trucks on Cope Avenue. Ken Haider, city engineer, said the
speed for all traffic on Cope Avenue is 30 mph and separate speed limits cannot be set for trucks
and cars. Commissioner Axdahl asked about sound level restrictions. Mr. Roberts suggested
that the tenants be .required to keep the shop -area doors closed.
Ga ry May, MDG Properties, was present. Mr. May said there will be two tenants. The northern
two - thirds of the building will be a warehouse where garments are .recycled (col lected, processed,
packaged, and the southern one - third will be an architectural sheet -metal
9 ed and shipped), ed PP �
manufacturing facility. He said this would be a good use for the property because the occupant
density is low, it is wholesale and not retail, the hours of operation are strictly work hours, and the
trucks would primarily be "cube" vans with only occasional semi trucks.
Commissioner Rossbach noted that there were close to 100 parking spots and only 40
emp loyees. Mr. Ma was a to a reduction in the required number of parking stalls. Greg
Y 9
Mack, Ramsey County Parks, commented on the aesthetics of greenery instead of a retaining
wall facing the paved pedestrian trail. Mr. Mack also asked to have the sight distance where the
trail crosses the building grade addressed. His concern was that southbound pedestrians on the
trail would be able to see the traffic on Cope Avenue. Mr. May said the retaining wails were 7
feet in the northern section,. near Highway 36, where the elevatiorl_of the pedestrian trail is
9
much higher. He said the parking lot is about one foot above the street level, for drainage, at
Cope Avenue.
Ken Roberts said if . the city council wants to reduce the required parking area, it should probably
take a formal action to approve a parking reduction authorization. This should be a separate
action. Mr. Roberts also referred to the Community Design Review Condition B. 2. f. which calls
for a revised site 99
lan. He suggested that the planning commission might want to coordinate with
P
that condition and require some kind of staff approval before the building permit is issued.
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 06 -03 -96
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a building in an M -1
(light manufacturing) district to be closer than 350 feet to a residential district. The city
bases the approval on the findings required by code and is subject to the following
conditions:
r
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The developer shall revise
the site plan to have up to 30 fewer parking spaces on the site, primarily on the west side
of the building, if the council approves the parking reduction authorization. The. revised
site and parking plan shall be subject to city staff approval. The director of community
development may approve other minor changes.
2. The city shall only require enough parking with the building for the needs of the tenants.
4.
This parking reduction is to less sen the amount of impervious surface area and to
increase the amount of green space on the site. The city council may require additional
parking in the future if the council determines that there is a need for additional parking
on the site.
3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
4. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
5. There shall be no outdoor storage of any materials or equipment without approval of a
revised conditional use permit by the city council.
B. City council grant a parking reduction authorization of up to 30 parking spaces to lessen the
amount of impervious surface and to increase the amount of green space on the site.
Commissioner Ericson seconded. Ayes —ail
The motion passed.
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MAY 28, 1996
C. MDG Properties Building, Cope Avenue
Mike McGrath, of MDG Development, was present at the meeting. Mr. McGrath said they are
in agreement with all the items in the staff recommendation. except for Item B.2.e. He said
their plans were.drawn with a brick and metal facade three- fourths of the way down the south
elevation. The balance of the south elevation would be precast to match the east and west
elevations. Mr. McGrath pointed out that the intent of MDG Development was to have the
face of the building as the north side, toward Highway 36. He thought staff feels the face of
the building is the south side, toward Cope Avenue. Since 'additional trees and plantings are
being required on the south side to make a buffer for Cope Avenue residents, Mr. McGrath
felt a full brick face wasn't necessary because it would not be fully visible.
Boardmember Erickson thought, based on the citizen comments, the south elevation will be
the most critical to the residents. He also noted their objection to increased traffic. Mr.
McGrath emphasized that there would not be a significant amount of additional traffic, and it
would be limited to business hours. He said there would be two tenants in the building --one
does light -gauge sheet metal fabrication and the other is a recycler and distributor of clothing.
The work activity typically occurs with the doors closed.
The board and staff discussed the distance to the pedestrian trail and the existing buffer
between that trail and this site. Secretary Ekstrand said a policy has been established by the
city to no longer plant amur maples. An environmental assessment determined that these are
not a native species.
Mr. McGrath said they would be willing to go along with staffs recommendation to make the
south wall and the wraparound on the west side brick. Mr. Ekstrand expressed a concern for
the residents to the west who would see a long wall on the west side of precast concrete and
a much larger building. Mr. Ekstrand and the board complimented Mr. McGrath on the design
of .the building and encouraged a revised landscape plan that would show the removal of
"'scrub" trees on the south elevation and replacement with a more dense type of year -round
screen.
Boardmember Vidyashankar moved the Community Design Review Board recommend:
B. Approval of the plans (stamped April 22, 1996) for the MDG Properties building on Cope
Avenue, subject to the findings required by the code. The property owner shall do the
following:
Community Design Review Board -5-
Minutes of 05 -28 -96
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit
for this project.
2. Provide following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit:
a. A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for
approval. The erosion control plan shall comply with ordinance requirements.
b. A lawn - irrigation plan for all landscaped areas showing the location of sprinkler
heads.
c. A certificate of survey of the property.
d. A revised landscape. plan providing the following:
1) Sod, instead of seed for the Highway 36 frontage, the Cope Avenue frontage
and along the side lot lines a distance of 100 feet from the south property
line.
2) Substitution of the amur maples with another plant type.
3) More trees along the Cope Avenue frontage using Austrian Pines primarily
for winter coverage. This plan may include the preservation of some of the
existing trees along the southerly frontage.
4) Submit the revised landscape plan to staff for approval.
e. Revised building elevations extending the brick and metal roof detail along the
south elevation and wrapping it around the west elevation to the first garage door.
f. A revised site plan providing for:
1) Four handicap parking spaces. At least one space must be van accessible.
2) Site - security lighting.
3. Complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
b. Restore and sod - damaged boulevards.
c. Install handicap- parking signs for each handicap- parking space and an address
on the building. Each tenant shall also be identified for public safety purposes.
d. Screen all roof- mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property.
e. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure if there will be any outdoor storage of
refuse. The enclosures must match the building in color and materials. There
must be a closeable gate that is 100% opaque.
Community Design Review Board Minutes of 05 -28 -96
f. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash -escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Boardmember Robinson seconded. Ayes —all
AGENDA ITEM H��
MEMORANDUM
TO: Cit En
FROM: Public Works Coordinator
SUBJECT: Award of Bid, Project 96-1 1996 Bituminous Overla
DATE: June 17, 1996
Action by Council, 6
Endorsed...-
Modified...
Re ected-,-.—
,.Date,,
On June 11, 1996 bid for 1996 Bituminous Overla Project 96-10, were opened and
read publicl There were two firms who bid the exact same price. These firms are
Ashbach Construction Compan of St. Paul and Tower Asphalt, Inc. of Lakeland,
Minnesota. Both companies have worked in the Cit of Maplewood and have provided
excellent services. Both firms are union shops and are available on short notice (1 to 2
da Both have e and labor in sufficient numbers. Therefore, it Was nearl
impossible to make a decision that could not be construed arbitrar
Both firms expressed a wish to "flip a coin" to determine award of bid. At 1:30 p.m. on
June 17, 1995, this was done in the Public Works Maintenance office. In attendance
were:
Lance Lun.dsten, Public Works Coordinator
Michael Kane, Public Works Foreman
Richard Anderber Ashba Construction Compan
Gar Balk, Tower Asphalt
The coin was provide ' d and flipped b the public works coordinator with the street
foreman as witness. B the '.'flip of a coin" it is recommended Project 96-10, 1996
Bituminous Overla be awarded to Tower Asphalt.
. RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS
. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWO D
O ,MINNESOTA,
that the, bid of Tower Asphalt in the amount of $21.25/ton for the construction of 1996
Bituminous .Overlay, City Project 96-10, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorize
Y Y d
and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city.
The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers
necessary to implement the financing plan for the ro'ect.
p 1
TABULATION OF BIDS
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meetin of the officials desi for
a bid openin b the City Council of Maplewood w as convened at 1 f a .m., Tuesda
June 11, 1996. The p u rpose of this meetin was to receive, open and publicl read
aloud bids for construction of 1996 Bituminous Overla Pro 96-10
Present were: Public Works Coordinator Lance Lundsten and Secretar Jud
Chlebeck
Followin the readin of the notice of advertisement for bids, the followin bids were
opened and read:
Bidder Amount Bond EE Q Affidavit ADA
Tower Asphalt $21.25 ton x x x x
Ashbach Construction Co. 21.25 ton x x x x
Hardrives, Inc. 23.30 ton x x x x
Midwest Asphalt 24.65 ton x x x x
W. B. Miller, Inc. 24.94 ton x x x
Pursuant to prior instruction. of the council, the cit clerk referred the bids received to
the cit en instructin him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation
at the re cit council meeting of June 24, 1996.
Meetin adjourned at 11 :05 a.m.
SENT BY v 6-1 ;12 : 4 6FM t BANN I GAN & KELLY -+ 612 777 85434 # 5/ 6
JOHN F HANNIGAN..1K,
PATRICK J. KELI X
J AMES i. 1 IANT N
JANET M. WILEBSKI
JOHN W. QU,ARNSTROM
1754 NORTH (:IZNTRAI.I.IvE TowFu
445 MI -MOTA S *I J(hhT
SAINTPALIL, MINNI S! 1 )U1
.tune 17, 1996
City of Maplewood
AT'TN: Lundsten
1830 But County Road B.
Maplewood, MN 55109-2797
Re: Pro ject 9&Bitwninous overlay
Dear Lan
( 224 37x I
1 (( 12) ?'J",1-80 19
It is our understanding that the City of Maplewood h -
� as received two exact bl&, specificall
�.. Tower Asphalt . $63,750.00
- Ashbach Const. - $63,750900.
AS you knew, Minnesota Statute 5412311 :states the contr s
resp onsible bidder act shall be let to the lowest res
p , after notice has been published once in the official ncws
days in advance of the last da � paper at least teen
y for subtxus ion of bids,
Pursuant to Minnesota Statute S41Z311 there must r
e un with the offiicials a reasonable d egree
of fair diser�ction in deter the lowest resp onsible p bidder.
The bidder who submit: the lowest bid in dollars ' - r,
is not necessarily the the lowest responsible
bidder" and the quoted phrase gives Council reasona n.able dtscaret�on �n choosing axx�c�ng b idders,
'�osponsi t�il�ity'� in bid state. re .�an�ea� not on ly �an.�a i .. _
� , cal responsibility but also integ s and
likelihood of the bidders doing favorabl � ��►
� e and satisfactory work. Promptness,, far +�� le as an
element of responsibility. . 1'
Value does not arrays depend on the rice alone '
. , p 7 e C. may also consider the quality,
suitaib.�I� �.y, and adapt�.b�l �t�' of the ar ticles. Where la � ` �'
plans and speciieatic�ns demand considerable
factors and no single bid is lowest in all these factor - -
the �rari s, the C ouncil may deride what way to g ive
c�us factors and considering der'in.g alt of th a rn, accept what i g
hid. P t deern.� to be the lowest rosp�ansible
B annig anKell P.,, .
y o
A 7' T 0 R N C Y 5 A - r I. A, W
06117196 12:50 TX /RX N0.1030 P.005
SENT BY
Mr. Lance Imndsten
June 17, 1996
Page -2-
6-17-96 V*12:46P.M BANNIGAN & KELLY-+ 612 777 9343 V'# 6/ 6
It is our understand" that both the biddem specificall Tower Asphalt and Ashbacb
Construction on -a wei scale, have all the * with respect to responsibilit Mcludin
.financial responsibilit integn"t sUl and a likelihood of faithful and satisfactor work.
It is our understandin that the contractors ha a g reed to an award of'bid b the coin flip. The dan area is with respect to the dete ation as to whether the above captioned re
are satisfied and the awardin of the contract are admin'stra&e acts of disCretion • wbich will be
enjoyed onl if done le arbitraril capriciousl or unreasonabl • NeWn v. Cit o fit: p
8 N-vWM 853. As a resul it 4 s m understandin that Tower
Asphalt and Asbbaeb have
a to the determination b a coin flip which could he cate as arbitrar capricious and
unreasonable. However, the have a to w
alve an contest with respect to the awardin of
the bid throu this procedure. 71is is still dan however, the are waivin their ri
Please see attached a
Respectfull y ours,
BA NNIC Aft & Yo P.A.,
PJK:Irn
Pat J. Kell
06117196 12:50. TXIRX N0. 1030 P.006 M
SENT BY
6 -17 -96 : 12'4,:7).M T BANKI GAN & KE. LLY-+ 612 777 9543: # 2/ 6
"LAecF
This Release, dated thi�I� day Qf d Ne` , 1996 by
Tower Asphalt
P. O. Box 15001
Lakeland, Minnesota 55043
hereinafter referred to as 'Tower;
and
Ashbach Construction Company
1', 0. Box 65738
St. Paul, Minnesota 55165 -0738
h.ereiraafter referred to as Ashbach*
WHEREAS, Tower Asphalt is a Minnesota Cor p ora tion •
rp anon located at Lakeland, Minnesota
55043, and
WHEREA.,'S, Ashbach Construction Co i s a
n.n eSFQuit lcorpt)ra,tloll with b usi ness
located in S Paul, Minnesota, and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is a Muni 'Pal corporation p rporation pursuant to the laws of
the State of lfinnesota,
WHEREAS, the C of Maplewood has requested bids
ds for Project 96,10 B• �tu ous
Overlay in the City of Maplewood, and
WHEREAS, 'P and Ashbach had submitted bid .
s o n Ju � 1, 1996 and said bids were
opened pursuant to minnesota Statute 412.3 on June 11 1 •
996, and
WHEREAS, Tower had submitted bid for Project '9
� 6-10 in t he amount of X63,750.00
($21.25 per ton), and
WHEREAS. Ashbach had submitted a bid in the amo of $63,750.00 ($21.25 per ton),
and
06117196 12:50 TK /RX N0.1030 P.002
SENT BY' 6 -17 -96 ;12:437M r BANN I GAN & KELLY-- 612 777 3543 ; # 31 6
4
WIMREAS, both Tower and Ashbach have completed prr�rle�ts xn the City of Ma Maplewood
p and
and have both siruilar requirements and qualifications as the lowest bidder,
11 Tdwcr and Ashbach have si milar requirements con Cerning responsibilit y, not
only to financial re
sponsiba.lity but aLso to integrity, �
g ty, skill, and the ab"lity and likelihood of
comPletrr,g the project in a faithful ands sat sfactory manner,
WHER Tower and .Ashbach have agreed in order tier to award the bid to the lowest
responsible bidder, the City's determination ma be governed •
y � erred bey a flip of the coin.
NOW, THEREFORE. IT IS AGREED
14 That Tower will release, hold harmless and in •
�l ernn� fy the City of Maplewood from
y action or ciaiM that may result in not being elected - -
g as the lowest respons b as a
result cif the determination b a coin fl p on Project 96
'Iat Asbbach will rel ease, hold harmless and ' •
indemnify the City Of Maplewood
l`rc►m any action or clal.rn that may resu
y It in not being selected as the lowest res om6bl '
p e bidder
as a result of the determination by a coin fl i on Pro'ect -
p l 10.
Ashbach and Tower have not discussed their re •
irres pective bids nor entered into any
Wecment with each other concerning the award o bids b the City of Maplewood.
4. Ashbach and Tower both rep resent that their r
P epresentatives .have the power to
exe cute this agreem a this agreement is entered f or the r
pu poems of releasing any an all
actions against the CitY Of Map lewood F ewood as a result of the Award of Ord t either
T ower or
Ashbach by coin flip.
V4
06117196 12:0 TX /RX N0.1030 P.003
SENT BY = 6-17-96 :12 : 4 FP.s BANNN I GAN & KELLY -
Dated this � � fi day of To , Ig96
Tower Asphalt
By ,r
y ep ►lr� ..�j.
' ,� `1LJV JCii
�►�. � =� ` MY QMN�f SS!(aN ,j Nis ,�
♦ %xMs RY � RES
P� f,2
Lm
3
06/17/96 12:50 TX/RX Nv.1030
612 777 0543 : # 4/ 6
LO RA VI
7
Alt
z, . Y,CCN I S I CO 1 S
JAN UAR
>G
P. 004
Z -/
Action bV Council
TO: Michael A. M
FROM: Brace K Ands
DATE: June 17, 1996
MEMORANDUM
and Recreation
Endorse.
M
Rejected.,....
Date
ity Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Ramsey County Land Conveyance
INTRODUCTION
The Ramsey Counter Board of Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 96 -213 dated
May 21, 1996 approving the Parks and Open Space Land Conveyance Agreement
between Ramsey County and the City of Maplewood. The enclosed conveyance
agreement is consistent inform to the agreement that was reviewed by the Maplewood
City Council in 1994.
BACKGROUND
The City of Maplewood has leased six park land facilities from Ramsey County for the
past twenty -plus years. The City has developed municipal athletic fields and associated
neighborhood park facilities on five of the park lands. The agreement proposes to
convey seven park parcels to the City of Maplewood totaling 144 acres. The seven
park sites are as follows:
1. Afton Heights Park
2, A portion of the fairgrounds, located north of the Willard Munger gateway trail
3. The .Goodrich triangle (less retention of the 50 -foot easement along North St. Paul
Road for possible road expansion)
4. Flicek Park
5. Wakefield County Park
6. County Ditch 18 soccer fields.
7. Joy County Park
The County proposes to deed all seven parcels to the City with the following
understandings:
1. The City of Maplewood will approve a conditional use permit and necessary
permits for construction of a golf dome west of the Goodrich golf course parking
area..
2. A. covenant will be placed on the deeds indicating that the property shall be used for
public parks and/or recreation purposes.
3. The City shall pay all deed taxes, filing and recording fees, and other incidental
costs associated with conveyance of title.
4. The conveyance from the County shall be in the form of a quit claim deed.
5. The City agrees to not assess any County park and open space Land for public
improvements such as roads, storm sewers, sanitary sewer and water, unless the
improvement provides a direct benefit to the existing and/or planned park facility.
6. The City will agree that the lease agreements for the Fish Creek open space site
property will terminate and the City will convey all usage rights to the Fish Creek
property back to the County.
7. Joy Park would be developed and maintained exclusively for natural resource and
outdoor based recreation and open space preservation.
8. The City agrees that all Ramsey County residents will have equal access to each of
the park land recreational amenities.
9. The City agrees to accept all Ramsey County obligations as defined in the water
access site agreement for Silver Lake, between. the State of Minnesota and Ramsey
County, dated July 7, 1984.
have reviewed each of the agreements with Greg Mack and the city attorney and
recommend that the City comply with the agreements as stipulated.
There are two issues that I would like to share with you regarding the acquisition of
these properties:
1. The City will be assuming increased maintenance costs for the maintenance of
Wakefield and Joy Parks. Enclosed is a letter dated September 9, 1994 outlining an
estimated cost of $17,500 for maintaining and developing Joy and Wakefield Parks.
have included in the 1997 budget request approximately $19,000 in increased
personnel and supplies to maintain and operate Wakefield and Joy Parks. It is not
possible for the existing City .maintenance division to assume the workload of
maintaining Joy and Wakefield, Parks without increased manpower and supplies. It
should also be noted that Joy Park will be bringing a host of new issues to our
department, including water -based resources. Specifically, the City will be assuming
two bathroom facilities that we have not maintained in the past on a year -round
basis and a public boat launch. It is my intent to speak with representatives from the
Cities of North St. Paul and Oakdale to determine if there are any areas of joint
.program maintenance and/or park development sharing for Joy Park.
2. The second. issue is the City's agreement to not assess any County park and/or
open space for public improvements. After speaking with public works director Ken
Haider on this issue, he indicates that this has been the City's practice - in the past
and that the County has not been assessed in the past.
At this time I cannot think of a specific assessment issue that could affect the
community, but want to make sure that the City Council is aware of that stipulation.
RECOMMENDATION
It is my recommendation that the City accept the land. conveyance agreements from
Ramsey County as stipulated in Ramsey County Board Resolution No. 96 -213 dated
May 21, 1996.
kd
3
Resolution
Board of
R amsey C ount Y
Presented By Commission Haigh Date May 21, .1 996 N 96-213
Attention: _
Budgeting and Accounting
Greg Mack, Director, Parks & Recreation Page 1 of 2
City of Maplewood
WHEREAS, Ramsey County is leasing six of its park and open
space properties to the City of Maplewood for municipal parks and
recreation purposes; and
WHEREAS, The. City has developed municipal athletic fields and
associated facilities on five of these park and open space
� p p
properties; and
WHEREAS, City and County staff, along with their respective
parks and recreation commissions, concluded that the following
County - owned property should be considered for conveyance to the
City based on character of the park, location and service area:
o Afton Heights Park
o A portion of the fairgrounds
Munger Gateway Trail
located north of the Willard
o Goodrich Triangle (less, retention of a 54 -foot easement along
North St. Paul Road)
o Flicek Park
o Wakefield County Park
o County Ditch 18 soccer fields
o Joy County Park; and
WHEREAS, The Ramsey County Parks a nd 'Recreation Commission
recommended conveyance of these properties t the Cit y of
Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, An agreement has been prepared that specifies
conditions of the transfer, including placing covenants on the
deeds stating that the property shall forever be used for public
parks, recreation and open space purposes; and
RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI, SIONERS
YEA _ NAY OTHER
John Finley
Sue Haigh
Hal Norgard
Rich O'Connor
Rafael Ortega
Brenda Thomas
Dick Wedell
Hal Norgard, Chairman
B
(Continued)
Bonnie C. Jackelen
Chief Clerk -County Board
i i
Resolution
Board of
amsey ount YC ommissioners
1
Presented By Commissioner Haigh Date May 21, 1996 No. 96-213
Attention:
Budgeting & Accounting
Greg Mack, Director, Parks & Recreation Page 2 of 2
City of Maplewood
WHEREAS, The conveyance of County parks and open space land is
consistent with the County's no net loss of parkland policy and the
1994. no_ net loss amendment to the Ramsey County Home Rule Charter;
and
WHEREAS, The conveyance of parks and open space land is
subject to the ordinance provisions of the Ramsey County Home Rule
Charter; Now, Therefore, Be It
RESOLVED, That the Ramsey. County Board of Commissioners
approve the Parks and open Space Land Conveyance Agreement between
Ramsey County and the City of Maplewood involving the following
properties: Afton Heights Park; that portion of the County
fairgrounds located north 'of the Willard Munger Gateway Trail;
Flicek Park; Wakefield County Park; County Ditch 18 soccer fields;
Joy County Park; and Goodrich Triangle, subject to adoption of an
ordinance in accordance with the Ramsey County Horne Rule Charter
and City approval of a conditional use permit and necessary
building permits for construction of a. golf dome west of the
Goodrich Golf Course parking area; and Be It Further
RESOLVED, That the County Board directs the Director - of Parks
and Recreation to initiate the ordinance process after receipt of
City approval of a conditional use permit and . necessary building
permits for construction of the golf dome; and Be It Further
RESOLVED, That the County Board authorizes the Chair and Chief
Clerk to execute the agreement and quit claim deeds for transfer of
title on or after the effective date of the resulting ordinance,,
RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMM1SS10NERS
YEA NAY OTHER
John Finley X
Sue Haigh X Hal Norgard, airman
Hal Norgard X
Rich O'Connor X
Rafael Ortega X By
Brenda Thomas X Bonnie C. Jac
Dick Wedell X Chief Clerk my Board
PARRS AND OPEN SPACE LAND CONVEYANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
1996, by and between RAMSEY COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinaf ter "County, " and the
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, Ramsey County, Minnesota, a municipal corporation
under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter "City.
In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter
provided, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1} The County agrees to convey to the City fee title ownership of the
park and open space properties described on Exhibit A and commonly
known as:
o Afton Heights Park 1
o That portion of the County Fairgrounds located north of the
Willard Munger Gateway Trail (Community Center site addition)
o Goodrich Triangle
o Flicek Park
o Wakefield County Park
o County Ditch 18 soccer fields
o. Joy County Park
2) The conveyance from the County to the City shall be in the form of
a quit claim deed,
3 ) The City shall pay all deed taxes, filing and recording fees, and
any other incidental costs associated with conveyance of title.
4) A covenant shall be placed on the deed stating that the property
shall forever be used for public parks, recreation and open space
purposes . In the event the premises cease to be_ used for such
purpose , title shall revert to the County. .
5) The City acknowledges the value of County parks and open space
property located within the City and that these properties
contribute positively to the quality of life for residents of the
City and, as a secondary benefit, provide natural corridors for
stormwater retention and drainage. In recognition of this positive
contribution and the County's conveyance of certain park and open
space land to the City for municipal park and recreation purposes ,
the City will not assess any County park and open space land for
.public improvements such as roads, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and
water unless the improvement provides a direct benefit to existing
or planned park facilities. The County will grant easements to the
City to accommodate Construction of public improvements -at no
charge where such easements do not negatively affect the intended
use of the park and open space property.
1 of 2
6) The City and County agree that the lease agreements between the
County, and City for City use of any properties described in Exhibit
A and the lease agreement attached hereto as Exhibit B for City use
of a portion of the Fish Creek open space site will terminate in
all respects at the time Ramsey County conveys all the properties
identified in Exhibit A.
7) The City agrees that Joy County Park will be developed and
maintained exclusively for natural resource -based outdoor
recreation (e.g. fishing, boating, picnicking, hiking, nature
appreciation) and open space preservation. Further, the City
agrees that all Ramsey County residents will have equal access to
the park and its recreational facilities. Furthermore, the City
agrees to accept all Ramsey County obligations as defined in the
Water Access Site Agreement for Silver Lake between the State of
Minnesota and Ramsey County, dated July 7,1984, and attached
hereto as Exhibit C.
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have set their hands and
seals all as of the day and year first above written.
RAMSEY COUNTY
By
.Its Chairman
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
By
Its Mayor
8y
Its Chief Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Director of Parks and Recreation
Ramsey County Attorney
Risk Management
Budgeting and Accounting
By - - --
Its City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
2 of 2
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR MAPLEWOOD PARK TRANSFERS
Afton Heights Park - P.I.N. 01- 28- 22 -24- -0001 (part)
The south 1150 feet of the east 700 feet of the southeast 1/4
of Northwest 1/4, subject to raods and easements in Section 1,
Township 28, Range 22.
Communitv Center - P.I.N. 14- 29 -22 -23 -0001
Part lying northerly of the M ST P and S STE M railroad
right-of-way of the west 870 f e e t of the south 1/2 o f the
Northwest 1/4 in Section 14, Township 29, Range 22, subject to
roads and easements.
Goodrich Trian2le ^ P.I.N, 14- 29- 22- 24- 0001.(part) .
Part of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 lying southeasterly
of North St. Paul Road and except that part lying
southwesterly of Hazel Street in Section 14, Township 29,
Range 22. '
Plicek Park - P.I.N. 16- 29 -22 -24 -0001 (part)
Subject to Frost Avenue, that part of the southwest 1/4 of the
northeast 1/4 of Section 16, T. 29, R..22 together with that
part of the southeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of said Section
16, all of which lies southeasterly of the Soo Line Railroad
right -of -way according to the plat thereof on file and of
record in the office of the Register of Deeds Ramsey County
Minnesota.
Wakefield Park
P.I.N. 15- 29 -22 -43 -0022
Siabject to roads, part of the west 1/2 of the southeast 1/4
westerly of the centerline of Prosperity Avenue in Section 15,
T. 29, R. 22
P.I.N. 15- 29 -22 -31 -0122
Gladstone Plat 2, Block A
P.I.N. 15- 29 -22 -31 -0123
Gladstone Plat 2, Block B
P . I . N. 15-29-22-34-0020
North 1/2 of vacated alley adjacent and part of Lots 10 and 11
east of east line of west 16 feet of Lot 28 Block 2 Warren and
Flints 'Addition to the City of St. Paul extended nor the rly
across said Lots 10 and 11, Block 3, Wakefield Park,
P.I.N. 15- 29 -22 -34 -0030
Warren and Flints Addition, south 1/2 of vacated alley
adjacent and east 7 feet of Lot 19 and all of Lots 17 and 18,
Block 2.
County Ditch 18 Soccer Fields
P.I.N. 03- 29 -22 -41 -0009
Except east 910 feet of the South 200 feet of the north 912
feet of the East 1/2 of the Southeast Quarter (Subject to
street) in Section 3, Township 29 North, Range 22 West
P.I.N. 03- 29 -22 -41 -0007
Except North 912 feet and except South 1,243 feet and except
East 554 feet anti except West 408 feet, the East 1/2 of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 29 North, Range 22
West, 'subject to easements of record.
P.I.N. 03- 29 -22 -41 -0006 (Part)
The west 100 feet of the East 910 feet of the South 100 feet
of the North 912 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3,
Township 29 North, Range 22 West
Joy Park
PII.N. 01- 29 -22 -11 -0002
Part southerly of Highway 694 of following: Northeast 1/4 of
N ortheast 1/4 and except the south 303.8 feet, the east 620
feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 subject to
roads and easements in Section 1, Township 29,-Range 22
P.I.N. 01- 29 -22 -13 -0016
Lakeside Park Addition to North St. Paul, Lot 10, except that
part of Lot 10 described as follows: Beginning at . the
northwest corner of said Lot 10 thence southerly.a.long west
line of said Lot 10 to southwest corner thereof, thence east
at right angle a distance of 75 feet, thence northwesterly to
point of beginning.
1
t
P.I.N. 01- 29 -22 -14 -0002
Lakeside Park Addition to North St. Paul, Lot 11
P.I.N. 01- 29 -22 -14 =0001
Rearrangement of Blocks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 6, 9, A and B Lakeside
Park Addition to North St. Paul, Lot C
P.I.N. 01- 29 -22 -14 -0003
.Rearrangement of Blocks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, A and B Lakeside
Park Addition to North St. Paul, Lot D.
P . I . N. 01- 29 -22 -12 -0003 ( State Use
Except the East 620, part lying north of Woodlyn Avenue and
southerly of the southerly line of Highway, of the Northwest
Quarter of the . Northeast Quarter (subject to roads and
easements) in Section 1., T. 29, Range 22
• EXHIBIT B
• - LEASE AGREEMENT
• THIS LEASE AGREEMENT made and entered into this
day of , 1986 by and between s
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
a municipal corporation under the laws of the
State of Minnesota (hereinafter "City "),
and
COUNTY OF RAMSEY, a po litical subdivision of
the State of Minnesota, (hereinafter "County ") .
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants and agreements
hereinafter provided, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1 PREMISES LEASED: The County hereby leases to the
City for its exclusive right to use, enjoy and control, the
following described .premises:
County Ditch No. 18 site: Parcel No*
• 3- 29 -22 -41 -0009 Un'platted lands except East 910
feet of the South 200 feet of the North 912 feet of
the East 1� of the Southeast Quarter (Subject to
street) in Section 3, Township 29 North, Range 22
West*
Parcel No. 3 -29 -2 2 -41 -0007 Unpl atted lands - except
North * 912 feet and except South 1,243 feet and
• except East 554 feet and except West 408 feet, the
East of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3,
Township 29 North. Range 22 West, subject to
l
easements of _ record .
Part of Parcel No. 3- 29 -22 -41 -0096 •Unplatted lands
The West 100 feet of the Eas 910 feet of the
South 10 feet of the North 912 feet o f the
Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 29 North,
• Range 22 West*
for recreational and for community use by all of the citizens of
Ramsey County •
2) TERM: This lease i for a term of twenty- -five (25)
Y
ears beginning on August 2, 1986 and ending on July 31, 2111.
3) RENT: The County makes no charge of the City for
this lease •
M .
4) ASSIGNABILITY: The City shall not assign this
lease.
5� PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION: The City ha subm Y mlt a W"Nuummm"
plan for the premises including a layout for use of areas,
including, but not limited to, play equipment; utilities and
plantings to the Ramsey County Executive Director. His approval
PP l
shall not be unreasonably withheld. As part of the approved
plan, the City may attach such fixtures, signs and erect
,structures in or upon the premises, all of which shall be the
property of the County in the event the same are not removed o n
or before the term and /or cancell of this lease
6) MAINTENANCE OF PREMISES: The City shall maintain
.the premises and property f urnished under this .lease in good
repair and tenantable condition during the period of this lease
in accordance with good park maintenance practices The Ramsey
C County y
o y Executive Director. shall approve all commonly accepted
environment intrusions* The City shall see to it that all
utilities and wires are placed underground.
7) USE* BY OTIiERS : Each agreement between the City and
a third party for the use, occupancy or enjoyment of the
premises is subject to the approval of the Director of the
Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department.
8) ASSESSMENTS: The City s.hall pay for all
assessments levied against the premises during the term of this
lease,
9 INDEMNIFICATION: The City shall indemnify the
County and save it harmless from any and all claims for damages
which the County may be required- to pay for .injury or damage
caused through the negligence of the City or any of its agents
or employees by virtue of its operation and control of the
premises*
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their
]hands and seals all as of the day and year first above written.
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
B joowa g�
Its Chairman
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
By
Its m
C /� B - Cu
Its. Ch Clerk 86 —SSA 1 s� Ci y Clerk
ounty * Attorney
Approved
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss
C OUNTY OF RAMSEY �
1927 Th e foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of
*6-&, by Diane Ahrens and John R. Velfn the Chair and Chief Clerk of he Rams
County Board of Commissioners, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota
on behalf of said Ramsey County Board of Commissioners.
f
Notary Public
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
RO BER.TA A. SO LDT
)ss LAMM Coywy
COUNTY OF R A MS E Y MY ca ll Wn1OA "W=2-3-92
t
9$� The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of ,
4 Y John the Y Y b C. Greavu and Lucille Aurelius M and City Clerk of the
City of Maplewood, a municipal corpora under the laws of the State of
Minnesota ,on behalf of the Maplewood City Council.
Notary P bhc
JEAN SCHADT
NOTARY H:•Lt_ . M: 04SOTA
�" RAM.EY Coin 1m
L My corr+miaion expires Jan. 31, 1987
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
David MacMillan
Assistant County Attorney
Suite 900
350 S/ Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
RETURN TO:
- Bannigan & Kelly, P.A.
4 Mid west Federal Building
50 E. 5th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
A
By
ounty * Attorney
Approved
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss
C OUNTY OF RAMSEY �
1927 Th e foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of
*6-&, by Diane Ahrens and John R. Velfn the Chair and Chief Clerk of he Rams
County Board of Commissioners, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota
on behalf of said Ramsey County Board of Commissioners.
f
Notary Public
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
RO BER.TA A. SO LDT
)ss LAMM Coywy
COUNTY OF R A MS E Y MY ca ll Wn1OA "W=2-3-92
t
9$� The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of ,
4 Y John the Y Y b C. Greavu and Lucille Aurelius M and City Clerk of the
City of Maplewood, a municipal corpora under the laws of the State of
Minnesota ,on behalf of the Maplewood City Council.
Notary P bhc
JEAN SCHADT
NOTARY H:•Lt_ . M: 04SOTA
�" RAM.EY Coin 1m
L My corr+miaion expires Jan. 31, 1987
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
David MacMillan
Assistant County Attorney
Suite 900
350 S/ Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
RETURN TO:
- Bannigan & Kelly, P.A.
4 Mid west Federal Building
50 E. 5th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
r`'IA
A G R E E M E N"
- - — --
THIS AGRE= :�!E :rr made this %� day of f �( 1c��
between the State of ;Minnesota, acing by. and through t:;e Commissioner
of the Oeparwment of 'Iatural Resources, hereinafte. :rred to as
"Co .. issioner" or "State," and Ramsey County, Minnesota, hereinafter
referred to as "Coun cy."
W ITNESSE n :
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Natural Resources has under
Minne Statutes 1982, Section 97.48, Subd. 15, the aut.*ority, duty,
and respons ib i 1 i ty to provide the p u b l i c with free state w ater access si
on lakes where access is inadequate; and
WHEREAS, " e County 'is author.i Zed under Min n esota Statutes,
Section 471.191 to operate recreat facilities; and
WHEREAS, additionally Chapter 301, Section 31, Subdivi n,
Laws of Minnesota 1983, appropriated funds to the Commissioner of Natural
Resources to acquire land,, develop water access sites on lakes in the
"metropolitan area," - establish priorities with the cooperation of the
• Metropolitan Council and local uni of government, and maximize local
effort and finances in the public water access program; and
WHEREAS, the State and the County have determined that the
existing publ access site on Silver Lake, legally described, to wit:
Lot 11, Lakeside Park Addition, Section 1, Township 29 North, Range 22 West,
Ramsey County, hereinafter referred to as the "Access," is totally
inadequate and is of "pri for improvement under the Metropolitan
Public Water Access .Program; 'and •.
WHEREAS, the State and the County desire under the authority of
Minnesota Statutes 471.59 (1982)) and applicable appropriations laws, to
cooperate in the financing of the improvement, development and subsequent
maintenance of a public acce on Silver Lake; and
WHEREAS., plans for such public access were submitted to the
State, were approved, the approved plan attached hereto as exhibit A and
hereinafter referred to a: the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the. contract for construction of the access was included -
as part of a park improvement contract entered into by the County with
a contractor; and
WHEREAS, exceeding the approval deadline in the contract
would mean additional cost or a possible delay in construction of the
acc &ass; and
WHEREAS, the State and the County had previously agreed upcn
58,000 as the Stata's share of the total cost of 526,.110 for the ac:c_s:
development, pending funding allocation; and
WHEREAS , the State was allocated deve 1 opmen t tunas by the
legislature but could not distribute them prior to the ac_ass approval
deadline in the County's development contract; and
WHEREAS, the County developed and comp 1 e ted the p u b l i c access
-in accordance wit.. *..+:` apProvzd plan and in good faith prior to the fun( "
r
becoming available to me_* construction deadline; and
WHEREAS, the pub 1 i c access has been inspected and approved 5y
the Oepartment of tilatural Resources;
NOW, THERE -ORE, in Dori s f derati on of the mutual benefits to to
derived by the public bodies hereto and for the benefit of the general
public, the parties agree as follows:
I. Access
The County upon completion of the Access in accordance wi M
the approved p l a n , agrees to operate the access in the following manner:
A. The County. shalt comply with all local, state and federal
haws, regulations, rules and ordinances which apply to management, operation
and maintenance of a public access. -
. - 8. The County shall be soTely responsible for the management,
operation and maintenance of the public access and keep the same in good •
and sanitary order as described herein in compliance with the_ terms of
the Agreement..
C'. The access may be used for limited picnicking but in no
event shat I such use interfere with its use as a publ is access to the lake.
D. The access and related facilities shall be free * and shall
remain open to the public every day of. the year at least 16 hours a day
between the hours of 4 a.m. and 12 midnight, except in emergency situations
or when modified with written consent of the State. •
E. The access shall have no launch restrictions placed upon
• the boat size or engine horsepower, except as adopted through surface use
• zoning regulations applying to all users of the lake.
r . T ne c to to reserves th r to the accts.: %t
al times to ins-., the County is i n co m p liance with the to �� s of m : s
P+yre�.. en t.
C. 'lie County shall post a sign infcrr;ml.ng the public at
the "access" is -- operatively provided by the County a the Oepar=ant of
Na_ur3l Resourca_. .
N. The County shall provide adequate rc l i ce protecticr and
s enforce provisions of this Agreement.
II. Fu- n
The State agrees to provide funds in ttie amount of �0
to .Supplement the cost o r" deve the access in acc- roance with the r
approved a 1 an. ?1ymen t w ilt be m. ade within a reasonabl t ime of te .ze
County submi is verified approved expenditures and the cost thereof incurred
and paid,
III. Liabi
Nei tier the State nor any of i off icers, agents, or
employees, officially or personally, shall be liable on account of any
f
claim, demand or cause of action made or brought b reason son or any alleged
act or Omission of the County or any of its agents, servants or emp loyee s
p s
in doing anything hereby permitted or required to be done b the County,
or by reason of any l of life, or an i n j ury or dam
- Y J Y age to .persons cr
• property, whether avoidable or not, that may be alleg to be due
3 to !i
• use or' occupancy of the premi by the County, it being he intent of
9 the
parties hereto that no risk or Liability is or shat i be �n
• curred by the
S tate or any of i is officers, agents or em l o ees officially
P Y � or personally
. by this Agreement or by the use or occupant of the premi Y p ses by the C cun ty
and that al such risk and liabi shall be and hereby are e - assumed by the
County, The County shall save and hold the State harmless from an y and
all liability arising out of the County's activi _ y i ties or use or occupancy
of the premises.
IV. Te
• This agreement shall coamence on the date i t i s encumbered •
•
- by the Commissioner of Finance and be er etual ex ' • •
P P exc as otherwise provided,
Y, nud •
Th e book s,, records, docu and a cc oun t ing procedur
and practi of the Coun rel evan c to this agr - C^men t are subject to
ex aination by t ~e Commissioner of Natur Resources and the State au dito r.
V I. A l tara t i on and En forcamen t -
Any material alteration of the approved plan after c=pletion
of the improvement and development :aunt be approved in writing by the
Cornmi ss i oner of uat :ral Resources and Ramsey County. This provision of the
_Acreemen t may be e. ^. forced by the State or the County in law or in equity and
no rwedy shall prec.tude another.
OP. nKTAENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES RAMSEY COUNTY
Y
T i t l e Tit C.tiairsn Beare or t:ouy (:u:e�,,..,
D ate
Date
ASSIS;?'MNT C IN1MIS„4
AUG 2 z 198• r; J
ADM I N I STRAT 12� ( = • ; % ./
8 Y Al 1 f; 7 7 lo ad T Ch ie Mi4rk County 8card
Title Date �'•S��S�j �y•f
Date G = MOY f
i;'
APPR as To FORM AND Ex I1T ~'` "`• i'` • -:
EC N
8o Y -U..
Hub rt HuT hre III -- •�..M_
A t t n ey Gene al QATF.
By
Spe s s f . Attorney General
Department of atoral R sourc s
Date � 0
1
l •
omw
r
lo:
cob
r �-
s ~
W -
r
,
�•
./
.40
I
• •
/ i � '..r.v •� �i���'
. T
w ar-
Aso
AV
RAMSEY COUNTY
Parks and Recreation Department
Gregory A. Mack, Director
2015 N. Van Dyke Street
Maplewood, MN 55109 -3796
September 9, 1994
Mr. Bruce K Anderson
Director of Parks & Recreation
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Dear Bruce:
Tel: 612 -777 -1707
Fax: 612 -777 -6519
In response to your request, the following is information about
Wakefield and Joy County Parks.
Wakefield County Park
Wakefield consists of 41 acres. Pursuant to the agreement
between Ramsey County and the City of Maplewood, dated November
19, 1984, the City was given the exclusive right to use, enjoy,
and control or regulate two sites identified on the attached
map. Site A is the area currently used by the City for
municipal recreation purposes and Site B is the Babe Ruth
baseball field site,
All agreements pertaining' to Site B are under the jurisdiction
of the City, subject to specific construction approvals as
defined in the lease agreement. Generally, the process that has
been used for site improvement is that. the Babe Ruth Association
has submitted proposals to the City Director of Parks and
Recreation who forwards his recommendation on to Ramsey County.
The County has authorized certain improvements to the site based
on the City's recommendation. One problem that we have
encountered with the Babe Ruth site is their desire to fill
certain areas of the park without authorization. We have not
authorized any of the site grading and clean fill activity on
the site. This is a matter that the City should address to
assure that the regrading and contouring of the site is in
compliance with all City standards.
In terms of operating cost, the estimated annual cost of mowing,
trash collection, litter control and restroom maintenance is
$11,000. There have been no recent capital improvements to the
site. Aside from the Babe Ruth activity described above, I'm
not aware of any environmental issues pertaining to Wakefield
Park.
Minnesota's First Home Rule County
printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10% post - consumer content
AR8CME
Mr Anderson
September 9, 1994
Fage Two
Joy County Park
The park is 63 acres in size and consists primarily of a
a.
lakeside picnic area and boat launch facility. I. believe the
most recent capital improvement was installation of the boat
launch. That occurred before I was appointed Director of the
Ramsey.County Parks and Recreation Department. In recent years,
oy Road was realigned and widened by the Ramsey County Public
Works Department. This improvement benefited the park.
The estimated annual cost for mowing, trash collection, litter
control, toilet pumping fees, etc, is $6,500. I'm not aware of
,any environmental issues pertaining to Joy Park.
As soon as our attorney returns from vacation, we will prepare a
draft transfer agreement for review. In the meantime, please let me
know if you have any further questions.
GAM /clm
Sinc rely,
Grego A. ack
Director
S -I
MEMORANDUM Action by Council:
Endorsed,- -- - -- - P'
Modified-_- mono
TO: Cit Mana Re
FROM: Cit Engineer Date-
SUBJECT: Lower Afton Road McKni Road Londin Lane Traffic Stud
DATE: Ma 30, 1996
Three specific traffic concerns were raised in the trian formed b Lower Afton Road,
Londin Lane, and McKni Road. Ramse Count and the Cit of Maplewood have
conducted recent traffic counts in the.area. Ramse Count h,---Is provided accident
data for the last four y ears at the major intersections. Usin this current information as
a basis for discussion, Maplewood and Ramse Count staff discussed each of the
traffic concerns.
The first item was the speed limit on Lower Afton Road. Currentl the speed limit is 50
mph. The last time this road was rated b a speed stud was in 1964. It seems ver
appropriate at this time to re Ramse Count to re the state to conduct a
speed stud on this section of roadwa After that information is available, the new
traffic volume information should be evaluated as part of the stud In the last few
y ears there has been a dramatic increase in traffic volumes east of Londin Lane on
Lower Afton Road. This is probabl due to the increase in housin units in Maplewood
and the retail development in Woodbur
The second concern involves westbound Lower Afton Road left turns onto southbound
Londin Lane. There are two options that could be considered at this intersection. A
left -turn lane for westbound traffic, or a b lane that westbound traffic could use to
g o around left-turnin traffic. Each of these t of projects have different, advanta
and disadvanta but both * are relativel expensive due to the lar amount of
pavement and g radin g that would be re for implementation. Review of the
accident data shows that the intersection is operatin ver well in its current
confi A left -turn lane would help eliminate rear-end collisions. As y ou can see
in 1992 there were two rear-end collisions, in 1993 and 1994 there were none, and in
1995 there was one. This accident histor does not indicate a ma problem at the
intersection. Therefore, .no action at this intersection is recommended.
The last item we addressed was the four-wa stop at the intersection of McKni Road
and Londin Lane. A four-wa stop si stud was done in 1986 at this intersection.
The information from that stud shows that there was a lar disparit in the traffic
between McKni Road and Londin Lane. That disparit still exists toda There is
seven times as much traffic on McKni Road as compared to Londin Lane.
Lower Afton - McKnight - Londin Lane
2 May 30, 1996
Installation of four -way stop signs in these situations traditionally increase accidents at
the intersections. If we look at the accident history at McKnight Road and Londin Lane,
we see that there have been no rear -end accidents in the four years of. there have
been three right -angle accidents, one in each of the last three years, and one left -turn
accident in 1994. The right -angle accidents may be reduced by installation of a four -
way stop sign. However, there has traditionally been an increase in rear- end.collisions
as I a result of stop -sign installations. Even though McKnight Road and Lower Afton
Road has higher traffic volumes, the rear -end accident phenomena is borne out by the
data. Installation of four -way stops at the intersection of Londin Lane and McKnight
Road is not recommended.
KGH
jC
INTERSECTION 1992 1993 1994 19951
McKnight at Lower Afton
Lane
Rear End 2
1
0
2
Right Angle 1
2
1
0
Left Turn 1
0
0
0
Miscellaneous 3
0
0
1
McKnight at Londin
Lane
Rear End
0
0
0
0
Right Angle
0
1
1
1
Left Turn
0
0
1
0
Miscellaneous
?_
0
0
0
Londin Lane at
Lower Afton
Rear End
2
0
0
1
Right Angle
0
0
0
0
Left Turn
0
0
0
0
Miscellaneous
1
0
0
0
�J �� UPPER At JUN ML). I
1996 COUNT 5453
1993 COUNT (5307) 120
.0
LOCATION
68
1 05 9 5
(1 048 1)
@ 39
LOWER
1737
LONDIN
5453
(5307)
��N
2 9 9 1
LN.
I
lih,
w 16 0 � , ` ,
POND i N.-ol 0#DAy
� ppN Z 0 LN.
c- >: MARY
of
<
\123 6 KING co 0 DAY >-
AI ST. <
(86--- 2� CIR. 0
w 0
oil 11 111-
C) 0 z
TEAK— g 0 -j CRESTVIEW
? 0 w
WOOD w 3: Li FOREST
TEAKWOOD DR. I,__ DR.
CT 0 V)
0 OAKRIDGE DR.
L
2HILLW
z
68 <
V) 20 >- DR. � DA
o 0
� C7-
<'
7921
(5307)
39
0
u
Li
I DESIGN:
I DRAWN:
DATE: 5/30 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD- ENGINEERING DEPT.
FILENAME:
I REVISIONS I I I I
LINWOOD
NEIGHBORHOOD
PAGE
AGENDA ITEM. Taw 01
MEMORANDUM ,anon on bY C Oune i
i9ndorseA
TO: Cit Mana Modified
.JecteA
FROM: Assistant Cit En Data
SUBJECT: Project 93-08 - Sterlin Street and Schaller Drive Utilit and Street
Improvements
DATE: June 17, 1996
I have attached the resolution for.acceptance of the project as well as the final pa
re from the contractor for said project. The contractor recentl completed the
remainder of the items that needed to be addressed so that the project is now
satisfactoril complete. The contractor's performance was acceptable and the work
was completed in a timel manner.
Althou the project had si desi revisions after the bids were received due
to land ac b the cit the total construction cost was held to less than two
percent above the bid proposal price. Staff 'recommends the acceptance of the project
b the cit council and the final pa of $4,000.00 to the contractor. The final
construction cost of the project would then be $763,348.50.
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
WHEREAS, the city engineer for the Cit y p of Maplewood has determined that
Sterling Street and Schaller Drive _Utility and Street Improvements, City Project 93 -08
is complete and recommends acceptance of the ro'ect;
p �
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 93 -08 is complete and maintenance of
� p
these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of any retainage or escrow is
hereby authorized.
PROJECT PAYMENT REQUEST
PROJECT 93 -08, STERLING- SCHALLER IMPROVEMENT
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B
MAP LEWOO D, MINNESOTA 55109
Estimate No. 6 - FINAL PAYMENT Period Endings June 15, 1996
Contractor: Ryan Contracting, Inc.
Contract Amount: $750,359.09
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QUANT.
TO DATE
PRICE
TOTAL
2021.501
Mobilization
LS
1.00
1.00
$7,500.00
$7,500.00
101.501
Clearing
AC
0.10
0.25
$5,000.00
$1
101.506
Grubbing
AC
0.10
0.00
$5,000.00
$0.00
104.501
Remove concrete curb & gutter
LF
170.00
123.00
$2.00
$246.00
014.501
Remove pipe sewer
LF
48.00
50.00
$8.00
$400.00
104.509
Remove blow off assembly
EA
1.00
1.00
$400.00
$400.00
104.511
Sawing concrete pavement
LF
8.00
6.00
$20.00
$120.00
104.513
Sawing bituminous pavement
LF
189.00
55.00
$2.50
$137.50
104.523
Salva a casting
EA
1.00
1.00
$95.00
$95.00
0104.601
Remove misc. structure (Limestone foundatio
LS
1.00
1.00
$1,120.00
$1
0104.605
Remove misc. bit. and /or concrete debris
CY
200.00
200.00
$8.00
$1,600.00
105.501
Common excavation P
CY
21,850.00
23
$1.20
$27
105.507
Subgrade excavation (EV)
CY
1,800.00
1,059.00
$1.20
$1,270.80
105.522
Select granular borrow CV P
CY
11,360.00
11,360.00
$6.50
$73,840.00
105.525
Topsoil borrow (LV) (P)
CY
762.00
0.00
$8.00
$0.00
105.535
Salvaged topsoil (EV)
CY
349.00
3,995.00
$2.00
$7
105.535
Salvaged topsoil from stockpile CV P
CY
384.00
0.00
$2.00
$0.00
0123.601
Street sweeper with pickup broom)
HR
17.00
25.75
$6
$ 1,545.00
130.501
211.501
2232.501
2340.508
2340.510
340.514
2357.502
Application of water for dust control
Aggregate base Class 6
Mill bituminous surface, 1.5"
Type 41 wear course mixture : 41 WEB50055Y
Type 32 binder course mixture (32BIB50000Y)
Type 32 base course mixture (32BBB50000Y)
Bituminous material for tack coat
M GAL
T
SY
T
T
T
GAL
34.00
7,219.00
238.00
1,219.00
833.00
1,627.00
1,149.00
� 15.00
8
782.67
1,458.22
588.31
1
635.00
$10.00
$6.50
$3.00
$21.90
$21.05
$21.05
$1.00
$150.00
$56,957.42
$2,348.01
$31,935.02
$12,383.93
$35,759.32
$635.00
2501.515
15" RC pipe apron w /trash guard
EA
2.00
2.00
$545.00
$1,090.00
501.515
21" RC pipe apron /trash guard
EA
1.00
1.00
$686.00
$686.00
502.541
4" perf. PE pipe drain w/Type 1 geotextile sock
LF
1
1,210.00
$8.00
$9,680.00
503.541
2503.541
2503.541
503.541
0503.602
12" RCP storm sewer Des. 3006 Cl. III
15" RCP storm sewer Des. 3006 Cl. III
18" RCP storm sewer Des. 3006 Cl. III
21" RCP storm sewer Des. 3006 Cl. I I I
Connect to existing 8" DIP sanitary sew
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
1,440.00
637.00
217.00
1,451.00
1.00
1
302.00
217.00
1
1.00
$18.60
$20.50
$23.40
$25.40
$750.00
$27,267.60
$6,191.00
$4,991.00
$37,109.40
$750.00
0503.602
Sanitary sewer manhole, 8' deep
EA
14.00
14.00
$1,140.00
$15,960.00
0503.602
8 x 4 PVC w e, Schedule 40
EA
23.00
28.00
$78.00
$ 2,184.00
0503.602
8" x 4" DIP sewer wye
EA
21.00
17.00
$295.00
$5,015.00
0503.603
Excess depth sanity se ma nhole
LF
184.76
151.01
$75.00
$11,325.75
0503 .603
0500.603
0503.603
0503.603
0503.603
0503.603
0503.603
0503.603
Pipe bedding, 3149.2F, fo 8" PVC
8" PVC, SDR 35, san. sewer pipe, 0' -15' deep
8" PVC, SDR 35, san. sewer pipe, 15'-20' deep
8 DI, Cl. 52. san. sewer pipe, 0' -15' deep
8" DI, Cl. 52 sa n. sewer p 15' -20' deep
8" DI, Cl. 52, san. sewer pipe, 20' -25' deep
8" outside drop
4" DI, Cl. 53, san. sewer service pipe
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
1,669.00
1,518.00
151.00
147.00
545.00
1,143.00
56.89
834.00
1,9 47.00
1,795.00
142.00
103.00
533.00
813.00
43.36
632.00
$0.01
$14.70
$19.30
$23.00
$28.00
$35.00
$85.00
$14.00
$13.00
$7.90
$19.
$26,386.50
$2,740.60
$2,369.00
$14,924.00
$28,455.00
$3,685.60
$ 8,848.00
$3,159.00
$8
1 0503.603
0503.603
4" DI, Cl. 53, san. sewer service riser pipe
4" PVC; Sch. 40, san. sewer service p i pe
LF
=LF
233.00
933.00
243.00
1,082.00
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QUANT.
QUANTITY
TO DATE
NT
PRICE
TOTAL
n:
0503.603 4" PVC, Sch. 40, san. sewer service riser pipe
LF
14.00
17.00
$7.30
$124.10
0504.602 Connect to existing water main
EA
4.00
T 4.00
$330.00
$1
0504.602 4 11 ate valve and box
EA
1.00
_... 1.00
$310.00
$310.00
0504.602 6'° gate valve and box
EA
8.00
8.00
$360.00
$2,880.00
0504.602 8 10 gate valve and box
EA
2.00
4.00
$495.00
$1,98
0504.602.12 ate valve and box
EA
4.0.0
4 :0 0
$
$ 3,3 64 . 0 0
0504.602 Adjust valve box - water
EA
7.00
11.00
$15 0.00
$1
0504.602 Hydrant
EA
9.00
8.00
$1
$9,400.00
0504.602 1" corporation
EA
44.00.
45.00
$72.00
$3,240.00
0504.602 1" curb stop and box
EA
44.00
45.00
$100.00
$4,500.00
0504.602 1" air vent assembly
EA
6.00
4.00
$278.00
$1,112.00
0504.603 4" DIP water main, Cl. 53, w /poly. encasement
LF
94.00
19.00
$21.00
$399.00
0504.603 6" DIP water main, Cl. 53, w/ of . encasement
LF
113.00
121.00
$22.00
$2
0504.603 8" DIP water main, Cl. 52, w /poly. encasement
LF
1,547.00
1,418.00
$16.00
$22,688.00
0504.603 12" DIP water main, Cl. 52, w /poly. encasement
LF
2,145.00
2,151.00
$23.70
$50,978.70
0504.603 1" copper, Ty e K, water service„ i e
LF
1,956.00
2 30.00
$8.00
$17,040.00
0504.605 2" rigid polystyrene insulation
SY
292.00
142.20
$9.00
$ 1,279.80
0504.620 Ductile iron fittings
LB
2,652.00
2,308.00
$1.60
$ 3,692.80 '
0505.603 Install utility conduit crossings
LF
5
5
$1.0
$ 5,000.0 0
2506.501 Construct drainage structure, Des. CB 2'x 3' box
LF
43.06
40.37
$155.00
$6,257.35
506.501 Construct drainage structure, Des. CB 48"
LF
113.49
98.93
$180.00
$17,807.40
2506.501 Construct drainage structure, Des. CB 60"
LF
36.19
43.42
$220.00
$9
2506.501 Construct drainage structure, Des. MH 48"
LF
31.82
18.72
$1 60.00
$2,995.20
2506.501 Construct drainage structure, Des. MH 60"
LF
21.55
22.49
$180.
$ 4,0 4 8.20
2506.516 Casting assembly, R- 1422 -0012
EA
21.00
19.00
$180.00
$3
2506.516 Casting assembly, R- 3067 -V
EA
31.00
31.00
$247.00
$7
506.522 Adjust frame & ring casting
EA
17.00
19.00
$1_7
$3
0506.602 Connect into existing drainage structure
EA
2.00
2.00
$450
$900.0
511.507 Grouted ri ra , Cl. lll, Design 31 33B
CY
5.60
11.40
$48.00
$547.20
511.515 Geotextile filter, Type !V
SY
13.50
16.00
$3.60
$57.60
2531.501 Concrete curb & gutter, Des. D4
LF
2,630.00
3,503.40
$4.6
$
2 531.501 Concrete curb & gutter, Des. D418
LF
4,65 0.00
3,783.
$5.
$18,9
0563.601 Traffic control
LS
1.00
_ 1.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
573.502 Silt fence, heavy duty, includes maintenance
LF
800.00
465.00
$2.25
$1,046.25
2573.502 Silt fence, preassembled, includes maintenance
LF
125.00
460.00
$2.00
$920.00
2573.511 Rock entr. pad w/Type V geo. fabric,incl. maint.
EA
4.00
0.00
$500.00
$0.00
0573.601 Erosion control, contractor's plan (1 % minimum)
LS
1.00
1.00
$7,800.00
$7,800.00
2575.501 Seeding
AC
2.77
7.54
$225.00
$1,696.50
2575.502 Seed, Mixture 375
LB
24.00
50.00
$14.00
$700.00
2575.502 Seed, Mixture 500
LB
120.00
750.00
$2.50
$1,875.00
2575.505 Sodding, Type Lawn
SY
4,425.00
2,080.00
$1.50
$3,120.00
575.511 Mulch material, Type I
T
4.80
13.86
$140.00
$1,940.40
575.519 Disk anchoring
A C
2.40
6.93
$95.00
$658.35
575.523 wood fiber blanket, regular
S Y
1,775.00
3,600.00
$
$5,040.00
2 575.532 Commercial fer tilizer Anal sis 8 -24 -24
LB
694.00
1,885.00
$0.25
$471.25
TOTAL $739,716.62
Origninai contract amount
Total contract work completed to date
Change Order .1
Change Order 2
Change Order 3
Less previous payments
Subtotal
Total retainage (0 %)
Previous retainage
Additional retainage
Subtotal
Retainage
AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE
CONTRACTOR:
$750;359.09
739,716.62
2,464.31
11,851.67
9,315.90
759,348.50
$4,000.00
$0.00
$4,000.00
($4,000.00)
$4,000.00
0.00
$4,000.00
DATE:
ENGINEER: DATE:
AGENDA NO. T dw 3
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Michael McGuire, City Manager
Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager
Action by Council:'
tndore a .m...,....�..-
Modifiet .
ReJected
Date
Upgrade of Video / Cablecast Equipment in Council Chamber
June 24, 1996
INTRODUCTION
The video /cablecast equipment in the Council Chamber is among the earliest generations of
equipment manufactured. Funds were budgeted in 1995 to replace this equipment, but they were
designated for other uses as the year progressed. Earlier this year, the City received nearly
$39,600 in franchise fees after paying for the services of the Ramsey /Washington Suburban
Cable Commission and GTN. These fees were not identified as a revenue anywhere in the 1996
budget.
DISCUSSION
For approximately $20,000, the video /cablecast system could be dramatically upgraded. Among
the items which should be replaced are:
* Switcher A light vertical band scrolls across the TV screen, indicating that all cameras
are "bleeding" through the switcher. There is no "Gen- lock" in the system, so the screen
jumps as the producer switches between cameras. One of the two "buses" on the switcher
is broken. The current model is no longer made. To have programmed bulletin board
and tape replays, it is capable of having only an auxiliary unit ( "Mini -T ") that must be left
on 24- hours -a -day; additionally, it has no memory to survive a power failure.
-- A new video switcher with two buses (each with an additional input), Gen -lock,
and two small production monitors is approximately $5,400 with tax.
* Cameras All of the cameras are old technology, and they all deliver dark images. The
remote camera behind the Council table is a surveillance ( "bank security ") type of
camera, as is the document camera. Like these cameras, the ones on tripods in the back
of the Council Chamber and in the production room are " 1- chip" technology; the standard
for cameras today is "3-chip".
-- Replacing each camera with 3 -chip ones, including the hardware for remote
control operation and wall mounting, would total approximately $12,200.
(The two cameras on tripods could be kept and used as camcorders.)
Video /Cablecast Equipment Upgrade'
Page Two
* Mini -T : This is a brand name for an automated program replay system. It has several
drawbacks: with only four ports, it can run only up to four tapes; it must be left on 24-
hours -a -day; in case of power failure, someone must rush in and reprogram it as there is
no internal memory.
-- A new version of the Mini -T has eight ports, and thus could expand our playback
capabilities as well as having an automatic default to the City's cable bulletin
board. It has a 5- to 7 -year internal battery for memory storage, so there is no
need to reprogram the system in the event of a power failure. This unit costs
around $1,000.
* Video recorder: This should be replaced. An upgraded model would cost around $400.
* Production room: Rewiring and recabling would need to be done for the remote cameras
and new equipment in the switching rack. A new surface is needed to place the character
generator. Shelving for videotape storage should also be provided.
To summarize, the costs to upgrade would be:
Switcher System $ 4,400
Monitors 1,000
Cameras, etc. 12,200
Mini -T 1,000
VCR 400
Rack, Prod. Rm. Cabling 1
TOTAL $20,000
Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council authorize staff to obtain quotes for
the equipment described above. Revenue for the improvements would come from cable
franchise fees received in 1996. The amount to be expended from the Miscellaneous division of
the General fund would be authorized by the Council after the quotes have been tabulated.
AGENDA NO. q,
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Michael McGuire, City Manager
FROM: Joel Hewitt, Fire Chief
Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager
RE: Notice of Termination of Fire Service Contracts
DATE: June 24, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council v
Endorsed....,....,. -
Modified....-
]Rejected---
Date
The City's contracts for fire services from the three fire departments- -East County Line,
Gladstone, and Parkside- -all expire on December 31, 1996. In discussions about the formation
of the Maplewood Fire Department effective January 1, 1997, the City Council has stated that it
does not intend to enter into agreements with any of the three departments for services in 1997.
Each agreement has a termination provision requiring a 180 -day notice. The City must notify the
departments of intent to terminate by July 4, 1996. While the notice provision is intended to
apply for termination during the term of the agreement (rather than at the end of it), the notice to
terminate is appropriate in this case to remove any confusion or assumption that the agreement
would automatically carry into next year.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council formally notify the East County Line Fire Department,
the Gladstone Fire Department, and the Parkside Fire Department, that the City of
Maplewood will terminate the agreement with each department to provide fire services
effective 11:59 p.m. December 31, 19960
(In the case of East County Line, this notice is a formality as the City and East County Line have
reached a tentative agreement on conditions for service in the Maplewood Fire Department in
1997.)