The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996 03-25 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 25, 1996 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No.. 96 -06 A. CALL TO ORDER I B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Council /Manager Meeting of Monday, March 4, 1996 2. Minutes of Meeting 96 -05, (March 11, 1996) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA EA. PRESENTATIONS } 1. 1995,Human Relations Commission Annual Report _ F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion There wi - 11 - be no separate discussion on these items.. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Carver School Conditional Use Permit Review (2680 Upper Afton Road) 3. Mounds Park Academy Conditional Use Review (2Q51 Larpenteur Avenue) 4. Cave "s English Street Third Addition Final Plat (County Road B) 5. Cottages of Maplewood Phase III Bond Refinancing 6. Donations from Circuit City and Best Buy 7. .Revision of Part -Time Clerk - Typist Position 8. Contingency Transfer for Fire Consolidation Workshop G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M.: White Bear Avenue Improvements, Project 89 -21 2. 7:15 P.M.: Countryside Volkswagen Sign Variance (1180 Highway 36) 3. 7:30 P.M.: Menards Conditional Use Permit Revision - Temporary Greenhouse (2280 Maplewood Drive) 4. 7:40 P.M.: North Glen Fourth Addition (Castle Avenue) Zoning Map Change (R1 to R -1S) Preliminary Plat Increased Front yard Setback H. AWARD OF BIDS I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Acquisition of Kohlman Lake Overlook Park, 2. Sign Code Amendment - Residential Signs (Second Readingi) 3. Lawn Irrigation Ordinance _.4. Parkview (Lower Afton Road and Londin Lane) - Zoning Map Changes 5. Loitering Ordinance - 2nd Reading 6. Historical Society Ordinance - 1st Reading 7. Schedule Meeting to Discuss Commercial Property Study J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Highway 61 Park & Ride 2. East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization 3. Bellaire Avenue, Beam - Lydia; Project 95 -18: Approve Plans and Specifications Authorization to Bid No Parking Resolutions K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. a 3. N. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 5:00 p.m., Monday, March 4, 1996 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 5:02 p.m. B1 ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Present Councilmember Sherry Allenspach Present Councilmember Dale Carlson Absent Councilmember Marvin Koppen Present Councilmember George Rossbach Present Others Present: City Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager Craig Dawson City Attorney Patrick Kelly City Clerk Lucille Aurelius Community Development Director Melinda Coleman Finance Director Dan Faust Public Safety Director Ken Collins C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Allenspach asked that the following items be added: J1. Status of AT &T Cellular Telephone Tower J2. Organized Collection J3. Highway 36/Hazelwood Street Crossing Councilmember Rossbach asked that the following items be added: J4. Handicap Access/Deputy Registrar Counter J5. Ramsey County Beam Avenue Compost Site Mayor Bastian asked that the following item be added: J6. Maplewood Historical Commission March 4, 1996, Council/Manager Workshop Minutes Page Two City Manager McGuire asked that the following items be added: J7. Parking Restrictions, Hwy. 61 /County Road C Park -n -Ride Lot J8. Vending Machines in City Hall Lobby J9. Stationery- -Notecards Mayor Bastian moved approval of the aizenda as amended The motion was seconded by Councilmember Rossbach and approved. Ayes: All D. PROGRESS ON 1995 BUDGET OBJECTIVES McGuire presented the report on progress toward the budget objectives contained in the 1995 budget, the first City budget in which objectives were listed. He highlighted results among the 177 objective's in the budget. After councilmembers asked questions and made comments about individual objectives, McGuire asked what improvements councilmembers might like. to see. Bastian asked if other performance guidelines were more appropriate.. For example, the City has no control over how many permits it must process during the year However, the City can control how well it p erforms on the permits- -e.g., processing them within 24 hours. There may also be good benchmarks against which the City could measure its performance. Developing performance objectives for the 1997 budget is one of the topics scheduled for the Council /Staff retreat on April 18 -19. There were several ideas about what to prepare for: (a) look at models for formulating objectives, and what features should be in them; (b) focus on a particular department or two in developing objectives for 1997; (c) have staff develop issues for their particular departments for the Council to respond to; ' (d) have Council identify general organization -wide objectives, standards, or expectations that would guide staff in developing departmental objectives. Councilmembers requested that performance on 1995 budget objectives be communicated in Maplewood in Motion. E. NUISANCE ORDINANCE Council reviewed existing ordinance related to junk/parked/abandoned Vehicles, weeds /tall grass, and accesso ry buildings s in October 1995, and .delayed further consideration to a Workshop. Coleman reviewed these issues and explained the City's process for addressing complaints. The vehicle nuisances are addressed fairly well for purposes of practical enforcement; processing them is problematic and borders on perceptions of constitutional rights. Staff recommended no changes to provisions related to weeds /tall grass (as there are few complaints from residents,) or g to accessory structures (as there are no difficulties in enforcement presently). Council and staff discussed the desirability of having a City administrative process for sanctions and fines for violations instead of needing to rely on the court system to process them. March 4, 1996, Council/Manager Workshop Minutes Page Three F. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY STUDY After some discussion, councilmembers decided to schedule a special meeting for which review of this study would be the sole item on the agenda. Council requested that staff re are a list p p which showed the permitted uses within each of the zoning districts covered in the study. The date for this special meeting would be scheduled during the March 11, 1996 Council meeting. g G ON -SALE LIQUOR FEE AMENDMENTS Maplewood currently has 22 on -sale liquor licenses issued plus 2 club licenses. In late 1995 the Council increased the annual license fee to $5,750, and retained the $200 fee for a Sunday -sale license. Collins reviewed some very preliminary and generalized data about the calls for service at Licensed on -sale establishments during 1995. Maplewood police responded to 526 calls for service in 1995. Kelly related the methods used by some cities to determine their costs for licensing and enforcement of on -sale establishments. As there were several pieces of legislation _p g now under consideration which could limit the City's discretion in setting .license fees, the Council wished to delay action on considering any changes in the approach the City Y ma take in setting on -sale liquor license fees. Councilmember Rossbach . moved to continue this item to a Workshop after the 1996 session of the Lemslature i*s adjourned The motion was seconded by Councilmember Ko pp en and approved. Ayes: All H. UPDATE ON SAINT PAUL WATER UTILITY DISCUSSIONS McGuire reviewed the proposals that the staffs of the City and the Water Utility had agreed should be presented to their governing boards for conceptual approval and direction for additional revisions. Essentially, the Maplewood system would become part of the Saint Paul Water Utility. Maplewood would need to make some improvements before the Utility would accept the system. By paying for these improvements through water rates, Maplewood customers would be able to pay the same rate for water service as Saint Paul customers in 2003. The Council directed that staff continue discussions based on the framework that has been developed. Mayor Bastian moved that this matter be placed on the agenda of the March I L 1996 council meetiny. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Koppen and approved. Ayes: All I. UPDATE ON FIRE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATION WORKSHOP McGuire related that this workshop had been confirmed for March 19, 1996. After some discussion, Councilmembers decided that . none of them should attend it. March 4, 1996, Council/Manager Workshop Minutes Page Four I OTHER BUSINESS I. Status of AT &T Cellular Telephone Tower; Allenspach mentioned that some residents in the neighborhood believed that AT &T was going to propose to place its tower at a location different than the one the Council had approved. Coleman indicated that there had been no changes made, and that progress on the tower was now in AT &T's hands. AT &T has disagreed with the City's proposed $5,000 license fee. 2. Organized Collection: Allenspach shared some correspondence she had received re ard.in the Council's decision to consider the possibility of organized collection of g g residential solid waste. 3. Highway 36/Hazelwood Street Crossing** Allenspach noted MnDOT's letter to legislators regarding Maplewood's request for a signalized intersection or bridge at this g g g location. MnDOT had denied the request and suggested that the City had requested several years ago that such improvements be deleted from MnDOT's capital improvement plan. Bastian noted that the City had never made such a request. Allenspach said she would bring add this item to the March 11, 1996 Council meeting agenda. 4. Handicap Accessibility Improvements/Deputy Registrar Counter:. Rossbach related that revisions he had been working on would raise the estimated cost for these improvements from $5,500 to $8,100. Consideration of these revisions would be placed on the agenda of a future Council meeting. 5. Ramsey County Beam Avenue Compost Site: Rossbach had several questions about how Ramsey County gained the ability to use this site and how well it is managing it. He believed the compost operation began in 1984 with the City leasing the property p p from KSTP and subleasing it to the County. He was concerned about drainage and off - site blic health effects. He requested staff to review the history of complaints at other p q compost sites near Maplewood. 6. Maplewood Historical Commission: Bastian inquired about the status of creating this commission. The Commission cannot be formed until the Council adopts an enablin g ordinance. Rossbach said that the Historical Study Committee has reviewed an ordinance drafted by the City Attorney and has returned comments to that Office. The ordinance should be forwarded to the Council by its first meeting in April. 7. Park -n -Ride Lot, Highway 61 and County Road C: McGuire reported he had received several complaints since the Council ordered no- parking signs around this lot last month. Several alternatives were briefly discussed. This item will be scheduled for the March 25, 1996 Council meeting. 8. Vending Machines in City Hall Lobby: McGuire related some recent requests to place vending machines in the City Hall lobby. Councilmembers did not indicate strong preferences to place them there or keep them away. March 4, 1996, Council/Manager Workshop Minutes Page Five Mayor Bastian left at 6 :58 p.m. 9. Stationery -- Notecards: McGuire asked the Council for feedback on the advisability of purchasing notecards and envelopes with the City's logo and letterhead on them. Councilmembers indicated he should proceed with the purchase. K. FIUIIU,RE TOPICS These items were continued to a future workshop. L. ADJOURNMENT Acting Mayor Allenspach moved that the meeting be adjourned at 7:08 p.m. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Rossbach and approved. Ayes: All MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7 :00 P.M., Monday, March 11, 1996 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 96 -05 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL: Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present Sherry A1lenspach, Councilmember Present Dale H . Carlson, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Kopper, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present D MINUTES: 19 Minutes of Meeting 96 -04, (February 26 1996) Mayor Bastian moved to.approve the minutes.of Meetin No. 96 -04 (Feb 26.. 1996 as corrected: Page 9, 3, c: "Councilmember Rossbach stated that, while he supports the concept, he cannot support this Ordinance because of the geographic stipulations contained in it. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Bastian moved to.approveth Agend, a as amended: L1 Highway 36 & Hazelwood M1 Past Mayors Meeting M2 On Street Parking Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all EA. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS NONE 1 3 -11 -96 b CUB SCOUT PACK 461 WAS IN ATTENDANCE TO OBSERVE THE COUNCIL MEETING. F. CONSENT AGENDA: Counci 1 member Carlson moved, ._ seconded by Council member . Koppen .ayes to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1 thru 3 as recommended. 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 42,063.37 Checks #6136 - #6148 -Dated 2 -14 -96 thru 2 -21 -96 $ 41 Checks #24198 #24294 Dated 2- 2`7 -96 $ 161 Checks #6149 - #6171 Dated 2 -22 -96 thru 2 -29 -96 $ 106o301.52 Checks #24410 -----#24495 -- -Dated _3 - 5 _ -96 $ 351, 087.17 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: $ 267 753.57 Payroll Checks Dated 2 -23 -96 $ 48 805.42 Payroll Deduction Checks #50837 - #50849 Dated 2 -23 -96 $ 316 Total.Payrol.1 $ 667,646 16 GRAND TOTAL 2. Oakdale Fire Department Dispatching Contract Approved the 1996 Oakdale Fire Department dispatching contract. 3. Disposal of Surplus Equipment Declared as surplus property and authorized disposal at State auction of the following items: 1976 Street Flusher /Tanker Truck SN.R80dbV13064 (Unit #542) 1986 Single Axle Dump Truck (Unit #b46) 1989 Chevrolet Corsica SN IGIL75115JY574193 (Unit #504) 1990 Chevrolet Corsica SN IGILT5411KE267090 (Unit #508) G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. (7:06 P.M.): Bellaire /Helen Improvement a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed Bellaire Avenue street and utility improvements. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Assistant City Engineer Matthys presented the specifics of the report. 2 3 -11 -9E d. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings. F e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Melvin Kuehn, 2937 Bellaire, Against. He stated he was already assessed for Beam Avenue. f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Koppen introduced the followin Resolution and.moved its adoption: - ce. 96 - 03 - 31 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS,, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of street and uti 1. i ty improvements on Bellaire Avenue, from Beam Avenue to Lydia Avenue Cit Project 95 -18, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on March 11 1996, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follow - 1.- --That-- - --t is - -advi s -abl -e ! --- exped- -ent and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct street and utility improvements on Bellaire Avenue, from Beam Avenue to Lydia Avenue, City Project 95 -18, as described in the notice of hearing thereof, and orders the same to be made 2. The City Engineer is designated Engineer for this 'i and is hereb y p directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of sa improvement 3. The Finance Director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. The ro 'J ect financing shall be as fol 1 ows : project State aid $ 659875 Special assessments 41 825 Sewer fund 2,600 TOTAL $ 110 Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Carlson, Koppen Rossbach Nays - Mayor Bastian h. Councilmember Rossbach moved to delete sidewalk-from the project i . Staff stated sidewalk was-not a part of the project. j. Councilmember Koppen moved to approve a joint Dowers. agreement with North St Paul for completion of this project. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Carlson, Koppen, Rossbach Nays - Mayor Bastian r 3 3 -11 -96 2. 7:00 P.M. (7:25 P.M.); Organized Collection a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding undertaking process or the to organize the collection of residential solid 9 waste b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Assistant City Manager Dawson presented the specifics of the report. d. Mayor Bastian stated testimony w i l l be heard until 8:15 P.M. and the hearing may be continued until March 18, 1996, then opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Norm Schiefferl, Ramsey County Division of Solid Waste Kathy Juenemann, 721 M. Vernon: Should continue.with the process Favors Walter Wegleitner, 431 E. Belmont Lane: Speaking for Gene's Disposal Against Justa Cardinal, 1875 Arcade, Representing Maplewood Senior Organization: "Consider a senior rate." ? Bruce Jordan. 1460 E. Belmont: Against just one hauler. Against Paul Kakelmeier, 558 Farrell: Against just one hauler. Against Ray Colosimo, 2323 Case: Does not want to pay for services he does not receive. (He presently has metered service.) Against Emily Winstad, 2249 Radatz: Against just one hauler. Against Resident of 711 S Concerned about cost Against Resident of 687 Ferndale: Freedom of choice issue. Satisfied with present service. Against Kevin Berglund, 1929 Kingston: Organized collection would help the City Favors Jesse Black, 2005 Greenbrier: Against Bill Kring, 112 Bellwood: Free enterprise issue. Against Kim.Carlson, BFI- Woodlake Sanitation: Opposes organized collection Against Don Misgen, 1367 Price: Why change something that is working? Against Resident of 2231 Radatz: Opposes Against Pat Frank, 1921 Price: Needs more specific details /consider free enterprise ? Resident of 1726 Abel: Believes in open hauling Against Marty Showers, 1719 Abel: Asked questions about how organized hauling would work. Against Bill Robbins, 2277 Stillwater: Wants lower costs, etc. Neighborhood could organize for one hauler (submitted a letter) Against Duane Gol aski , Mayhi l l Road: Believes in competition - consider. pick up every other week. City should not get involved. Leave system alone.Against Tim Kline, 1954 Donna Senty Drive: Opposes Against Kathy Juenemann, 721 Mt. Vernon: Maplewood system will not be like the North St. Paul system • - - -- Kevin Berglund, 1929 Kingston: Be sure City goes in right direction. - - - -- Carl Johnson, 1946 E. Larpenteur (with Boy Scout Troop 461): City should have. organized collection, Council should protect the environmentFavors Chris Reinhardt, 1041 East County Road C,.Evergreen Environmental: Believe's in free enterprise - just bought trucks and started the business. This system would hurt small businesses. Against Kathy . Juenemann, 721 Mt. Vernon: Clarified the idea that only one hauler would be used, and that Council has no preconceived idea if there would be one or all --•-- e. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing._ 4 3 -11 -96 r f. Councilmember Allenspach introduced the followinq Resolution and moved its _ adoption 96 _ 03 _ 32 A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO COMMENCE THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION AND PLANNING FOR A POTENTIAL SYSTEM OF ORGANIZED COLLECTION OF RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE IN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood desires to evaluate the potential benefits of organizing collection of residential solid waste; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 115A.94 allow cities to organize collection of solid waste and identifies a process for organization; and WHEREAS, the .City of Maplewood has rovi ded mai 1 ed notice to P collectors of solid waste licensed by the City in 1.995 and 1996, and has published notice in the official newspaper of the public hearing to consider organizing solid waste collection; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood on March 11, 1996 , held a public hearing on its intent. to consider organized collection, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council establishes its intent to evaluate and possibly organize residential solid waste collection in the City and invites the participation of persons, including all persons licensed to operate solid waste collection, in .planning and establishing this organized collection system. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all COUNCIL STATED THAT PASSIVE OF THIS RESOLUTION DOES NOT MEAN THAT AN ORGANIZED COLLECTION PROJECT HAS BEEN APPROVED. g. Mayor Bastian moved.that on the 2nd meetin _of.ever month commencin. with A ril there be are ort b staff re ardin or anizedd Colle ction. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all COUNCIL STATED THERE WILL BE NO NEED FOR THE HEARING TO BE CONTINUED 3. 7:30 P.M. (9:05 P.M.) Highwood 5th Addition (O'Day Street) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public. hearing regarding a proposal to develop Highwood Fifth Addition, consisting of one lot for a house on a 1.11 -acre site on the north end of O'Day Street, north of Schaller Drive. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Coleman p resented the specifics of the report. p 5 3 -11 -9F d. Commissioner Gary Pearson presented the Planning Commission report. e. y P or Ma Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents.. The following persons were heard. Joe Yankovich, 857 O'Day Street Liz Creager, 2539 Schaller Drive Sam Bernstein, 2531 Schaller Drive Kevin Berglund, 1929 Kingston f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. Street Vacation Councilmember Carlson introduced the fol lowing Resolution and moved its .g adoption: 96 - 03 - 33 STREET VACATION WHEREAS, Mr. y ea . Dennis Gon applied for the vacation of the following - pp described street right -of -way: That P .art of O'Day Street north and east of an easterly continuation of the North line of Lot 3, Block 1, Highwood Third Addition in Section 13, Townshi.p 28, Range 22 WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On February 20, 1996, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this vacation. 2. On Ma rch 11 1996 the City Council held a public hearing. The City taff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent y P . a notice to the abutting property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will l 9 o to the following abutting properties: p y Outlots A and B of Highwood Third Addition NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described vacations for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The City and the developer have no plans to build a street north of this site. 3. The adjacent properties have street access. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -all 6 3 -11 -96 Preliminary Plat N h. Councilmember Carlson moved approve the H ghwood Fifth Addition rel iminar tat receive t e t on February 2 19960 Before the City Counci 1 approves the final Plat, a developer shall complete the following conditions_ 1 Change the street relocation plan to show the cul-de-sac right- of-way on the final plat. 2. Deed Lot 2 to the City and record this deed with the final plat. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF TO INVESTIGATE THE SIZE OF THE CUL -DE -SAC ON O'DAY STREET. 4. 7:50 P.M. (9:30 P.M.): Ramsey County Correctional Facility (297 Century Avenue South) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request from Ramsey County to switch from a farming operation, to a plant nursery and greenhouse operation at,. the Ramsey County Correctional Facility. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Pearson presented the Planning Commission report. e. Boardmember, Bergren presented the Community Design Review Board report. f. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing., calling for proponents or , opponents. The following persons were heard: Scott Simpson, Nurseryman at the facility Art Cavara, Superintendent of the facility g. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. Conditional Use Permit Revision h. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following _Resol tion and moved its adoption• 96 -03 -34 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Community Corrections Department applied for a conditional use permit to switch from a farming operation to a plant nursery and greenhouse operation at the Ramsey County Correctional Facility. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 297 South Century Avenue. The 1 e 9 a1 description s 7 3 -11 -9F ,EX PART SWLY OF NEW AFfON ROAD; N 1/2 OF NE 1/4 & EX CRESTVIEW; PART NE OF AFTON RD OF SW 1/4 OF. NE 1/4 & SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 & NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS & PIPE LTNE ESMT) IN SEC 12 TN 28 RN 22. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On February 20, 1996, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Counci 1 .approve this permit. 2. The C-ity Council held a public hearing on March 11, 1996. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding ro erty.owners as required by law. The Council p P gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 1: The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and p o erated to be in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use.would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, . hazardous, detrimental disturbing or cause a nuisance to any p erson or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, p dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run - off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 10. The City Council may waive any of the above requirements for a public building or utility structure, provided the Council shall first make a determination that the balancing of public interest between governmental units of the state would be best served by such waiver. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 8 3 -11 -9F 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the City. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The county corrections department shall file an annual report with the City manager informing the City of the following: a. If the percentage of felons increases above 29% of the inmates or. if the percentage of gross misdemeanors increases above 33% of the inmates. b. Of any applications fora license for the facility that increase the maximum number of inmates above 293. c. If the daily population exceeds the county's license for more than 21 (twenty -one) consecutive days. If condition 2.a. or 2.c. occurs, the City Council may reconsider the conditional use permit,. The City must approve any increase in the facility inmate population license prior to it becoming effective. 3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year if the---- greenhouse is not built. Future reviews shall be done only if a problem arises or if major construction is proposed. Minor construction shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. Seconded byCouncilmember Carlson Ayes - all Design Approval i. Councilmember Carlson moved to a rove the Tans_ stamedDecember 29 1995 for the greenhouses at the Ramsey County orrect i onaTFaci 1 i tv at 297 South Century Avenue., Ramsey County shat l d o. the fol l owi nq : 1. Repeat this review in one year if the City has not issued a building permit for the first greenhouse. 2. Comply with the approved plans. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 3. Apply for City Council approval of any building construction on county property.south of Lower Afton Road. Seconded by Council.member Koppen Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Al 1 enspach , Carlson, Ko pp en Nays - Councilmember Rossbach 5. 8:00 P.M. (9:51 P.M.): Parkview (Lower Afton Road and Londin Lane) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposal to develop 42 single - family homes between Lower Afton Road and Londin Lane, west of Connemara Condominiums. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 9 3 -11 -9F r Director of .Community Development Coleman c. D i rec Y resented the specifics of the P P report. d. Commissioner Pearson presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Ted Bearth, 2276 Londin Lane: In favor of the project Cathleen Laska, 2332 Dorland Road: Against the project Bill Miller, 39.5 Crestview Drive: Against John Peterson, Good Value Homes, the developer f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. Land Use Plan Changes g Councilmember Carlson intro._duced the following Resolution and moved its ado.Dti on : 96 - 03 - 35 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, John Peterson of Good Value Homes proposed changes to the City's land use plan from R -3(M) (residential medium density) and CO (commercial office) to R -1 (single dwellings) and OS (open space). WHEREAS, these changes apply to the undeveloped property located between Lower Afton Road and Londin Lane, west of Connemara Condominiums. WHEREAS, these changes. apply, to the proposed Blocks 2 and . 3 and Outlot A of Parkview. WHEREAS, the history of these changes is as follows: 1. On February 20, 1996, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The City staff published a hearing notice. in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission g ave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission .recommended that the City Council approve the plan amendments. 2. On March 11, 1996, the City Council discussed the land use plan changes. They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described changes for the following reasons: 1. They would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. 2. The developer is proposing to develop this part of the site with single dwellings. 3. It would reduce the allowable density and traffic from this site. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 10 3 -11 -96 h. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 96 - 03 - 36 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Arnie Johnson proposed a change to the City's land use plan from CO (commercial office.). to BC (:business commercial). WHEREAS, City staff proposed to change the City's land use plan to BC -M (business commercial modified) for the site. WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property on the south side of Lower Afton Road, east of the proposed Holiday Stationstore and west of Connemara Condominiums. WHEREAS, this change applies to the proposed Lot 1, Block 1 of Parkview. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. on February 20, 1996, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The City staff published a heari ng notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the plan amendments. 2. On March 11, 1996, the City Council discussed the 1 and use l an changes. They considered reports and recommendations P ions from the Planning Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described City staff proposed change for the following reasons: 1. They would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. 2. The BC -M designation would serve as a transition area between the proposed Holiday Stati onstore and the residential area to the south. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Carlson, Koppen Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember Rossbach i . Councilmember Carlson introduced the following .Resolution, and moved its adoption• 11 3 -11 -9F 96 -03 -37 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Arnie Johnson proposed a change to the City's land use plan from R -3(M) (residential medium density) and CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). WHEREAS, City staff proposed to change the City's land use. plan to LBC (limited business commercial). WHEREAS, these changes apply to the undeveloped property located on the pp east side of McKnight Road, south of the proposed Holiday Stationstore. WHEREAS, this change applies to the proposed Lot 3,, Block 1 of Parkview. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as-follows.:, 1. On February 20, 1996, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a .chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning p Commission recommended that.tfie City Council approve the plan amendments. 2. on March 11, 1996, the City Council discussed . the land use plan changes. They considered reports and recommendations from the P1 anni ng Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described City staff change for the following reasons: 1. They would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. 2. The larger LBC area would increase the transition area between the existing houses and the proposed Holiday Stationstore. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Carlson, Koppen Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember Rossbach Zoning Map Changes j. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 12 3 -11 -96 96 -03 -38 ZONING MAP CHANGE .WHEREAS, Good Value Homes applied for a change in the zoning map from CO (commercial office) and F (farm residential) to R -1 (single dwelling residential). WHEREAS, this change applies to the property north of Londin Lane, west of 2445 Londin Lane. The legal description is - : That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota; described as follows; Commencing at a cast iron monument found for the Northwest corner of said Section 12, thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 21 seconds East., on an assumed bearing basis, along the West l i n e of said Section 12, a distance of 362.00 feet; Thence North 88 degrees 15 minutes 57 seconds East, with the South line of the North 362 feet of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 705.53 feet; Thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds East, a distance of 265.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING herein; Thence South 69 degrees 43 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 280.33 feet; Thence North 88 degrees 15 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 349.07 feet; Thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds East with the East line of the said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance - of 548.15 feet to the North right of wa line of . y . Londin Lane; Thence South 88 degrees 18 minutes 55 seconds West with said right of way line, a distance of 1067.16 feet Thence North 00 degrees 18 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 417.10 feet; Thence North 88 degrees 19 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 40.11 feet; Thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of 235.21 feet ; Thence North - 88 degrees 15 - m - nutes 57 seconds East, a distance of 415.46 to the POINT OF BEGINNING herein, containing 14.6118 acres of land area. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On February 20, 1996, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the change. 2. On March 11, 1996, the City Council held a public hearing. The .City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described change in the zoning map for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. f 13 3 -11 -9F a 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical., efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all NO ACTION TAKEN ON REQUESTS To MAKE TWO CHANGES IN THE ZONING MAP: FROM CO TO BC AND FROM F. Co AND LBC TO BC. Preliminary Plat k. Mayor Basti an moved to. approve the Parkvi ew prel ii mi nary pl at Q.recei ved b the City on Februar 29 1996 The developer shall com lete the followi..ng before the City Council approves the final plat 1. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or contractor will a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all City requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Install permanent signs around the edge of any wetland buffer easements. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling, grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign design and location before the contractor installs them. d. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries. e. Have NSP install street lights in three locations, primarily at street i ntersecti ons`.. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. f. Pay the City for the cost of traffic - control, street identification and no parking signs. g. Provide all required and necessary easements. 14 3 -11 -9E h. Demolish or move the existing buildings on the site. Abandon any wells or septic systems, subject to the Environmental Health Official's approval.. i. Construct an eight - foot -wide paved walkway and fencing between Lots 6 and 7, Block 2. This trail shall be between the street and the proposed sanitary sewer manhole on the west property line of Lot 6, Block 2. Also construct a 10- foot -wide paved walkway from the proposed sanitary sewer manhole on Lot 6, Block 2 to Lower Afton Road. The developer also shall provide a split -rail fence on both sides of the trail and shall install posts at each end of the trail to prevent cars or trucks from using the trail. The developer shall build the entire trail and any required fencing with the street. The City. Engineer must approve these plans. Maplewood is requiring the developer to pay for the trail within the plat since the trail will provide access to the commercial buildings on Lower Afton Road and Mcknight for 'the residents of the new plat. J. Construct an eight - foot -wide un -paved walkway and fencing between Lots 11 and 12, Block 2. This trail shall be between the street and the north property l i n e of the development. The developer also shall provide a split - rai.l fence on both sides of the trail within the development. The City Engineer must approve these plans Maplewood is requiring the developer to pay for the trail within the plat since the trail will provide access to Battle Creek Park to the residents of the new plat. 2.* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and Engineering plans. These plans shall include grading, utility, 'Aral nage, erosi on control , tree, trai 1 and, street pl ans . The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the City code. b. The grading - plan shall: 1) Include proposed building pad_ elevation and contour information for each home site. 2> Include contour. information for the land that the street construction will disturb. 3) .Show sedimentation basins. as required by the watershed board. 4) Show housing styles that reduce the grading on .sites where the developer can save large trees. c. There shall be backyard drains connected to the storm sewer system in at least three .locations in Block 3. These shalI.be between Lots 2, 3 and 9, between Lots 5, 6 and 8 and between Lots 10 11 and 12. The developer shall dedicate all necessary easements for these drains and pipes. . 15 3 -11 -96 d. Extend the storm sewer in Parkview Lane east to at least Lot 13, Block 3 and P rovide two additional catch basins in the street. e. Change the grading and utility plans to follow the lot and street design on the preliminary plat received by the City on February 29, 1996. f.* Provide a tree plan for the City Engineer's approval before grading or final plat approval. This plan shall show. where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan also must show the size,. species and location of any trees that the developer will plant as replacement trees. All trees that the developer will plant shall be at least 2 -.112 inches in diameter. There shall be no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. g. The street and utility plans shall show a paved trail between Lots 6 and 7, Block 2 from Parkview Lane and Lower Afton Road. This trail shall be 8 feet wide from Parkview Lane to the sewer manhole and shall be 10 feet wide from the sewer manhole to Lower Afton Road. h.. The streets shall be 28 feet wide from face to face of the concrete curb and gutter with no parking on one side. 3. Change the plat as follows: a. Make the util.ity easement between. Lots 6 and 7, Block 2 and between Lots 1, 2 and 3. Block 1, a utility and pedestrian easement. This easement shall be at least 30 feet wide between Parkview Lane and the sanitary sewer manhole. b. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the City Engineer. c. Show the wetland boundaries on the final plat as approved by the watershed district. d. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. 4. Provide all easements required by the City Engineer. These shall include wetland easements over the wetlands. The easements shall cover the wetlands and any land within"100 feet surrounding the large wetland. The easement shall prohibit any building or structures within 100 feet of the wetland or any mowing, cutting, filling, grading or dumping within 100 feet of the large wetland or within the wetland itself. For the smaller wetlands, the easement shall be at least 20 feet wide. The purpose of the easements is to protect the water quality of the wetlands from fertilizer, runoff and to protect the wetland habitat from encroachment. 16 3 -11 -9F 5 . Record the following with the final plat: a. A deed dedicating Outl of A to the City with a 100-foot- wide wetland buffer easement surrounding the wetland. b. A deed dedicating a wetland easement around the smaller wetlands along with a wetland buffer surrounding the easement. The City Engineer shall approve the width of this buffer based on the wetland classifications in the City code. c. A deed dedicating three feet of additional right -of -way along McKnight Road for future street widening. d. Cross easements between the Holiday site and the adjacent lots for the shared - access driveways The applicant shall submit t'he language for these dedications to the City for approval before recording. The applicant shall show all the wetlands on the final plat. 6. Show the wetland boundaries on the plat as delineated on the site. A trained and qualified person must delineate the wetlands. This person shall prepare a wetland delineation report. The developer shall submit this wetland information to the Watershed District office. The Watershed District_ must approve this information before the City approves a final plat. If needed, the developer shall change the plat to conform to wetland regulations. 7. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for any wetland filling. 8. Determine the elevation of the ordinary high water mark for the pond south of Lower Afton Road for the - Department of Natural Resources. Apply for and receive any permits the DNR requires. 90 Dedicate cross easements for ingress, egress and maintenance between the proposed corner property shown as the proposed Holiday Stationstore and the adjacent parcels. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the Director of Community Development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the City issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -all Street Width Reduction 1. Council member Carlson introduced the following Resolution and ,moved its adopt i on: 17 3 -11 -96 96 - 03 - 39 .STREET WIDTH CODE VARIATION WHEREAS, Mr. John Peterson of Good Value Homes requested a variation from the C i ty code. WHEREAS, this code variation applies to the Parkview development that is south of Lower Afton Road, north of Londin Lane and east of McKnight Road. WHEREAS, the legal description for this property is: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota; described as follows; Commencing at a cast iron monument found for the Northwest corner of said Section 12, thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 21 seconds East, on an assumed bearin g basis, along the West line of said Section 12, a distance of 362.00 feet; Thence North .88 degrees 15 minutes 57 seconds .East, with the South line of the: North. 362 feet of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 705.53 feet; Thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds East..a distance of 265.08 feet to the POINT OF . BEGINNING herein; Thence South 69 degrees 43 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 280.33 feet; Thence North 88 degrees 15 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 349.07 feet; Thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds East with the East line of the said Northwest Quarter. of the Northwest Quarter., a distance of 548.15 feet to the North right of way line of Londi -n - Lane Thence South--88 degrees 18 minutes 55 seconds West with said right of way line, a distance of 1067.16 feet; Thence North 00 degrees 18 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 417.10 feet; Thence North 88 degrees 19.minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 40.11 feet; Thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of 235.21 feet; Thence North 88, degrees 15 minutes 57 seconds East, a distance of 415,46 to the POINT OF BEGINNING herein. WHEREAS, Section 29- 52(a)(9) of the Maplewood City Code requires that local residential streets shall be 32 feet in width, measured between faces of curbs. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 28- foot -wide streets with no parking on one s i de. WHEREAS, this requires a variation of four feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows: The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on March 11, 1996. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the ,hearing a chance to speak and to present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the above - described variation subject to no parking on one side of the streets, all streets be aligned and given the name of Parkway Lane, and the developer paying the City for the cost of no- parking signs. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 18 3 -11 -9F MAYOR BASTIAN MOVED.TO.SUSPEND THE RL WITH ALL OTHER REMAINING ITEMS TO BI SECONDED BY 000NCILMEMBER CARLSON H AWARD.OF BIDS NONE 00 AYES - ALL -1, I -59 , I -6, J 7 MEETING. I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS ift 1. Project 95 -17, TH 61 Water Main Improvements, Beam Ave. to Co. Road.D Approve Plans Advertise for Bids a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Engineer Matthys presented the specifics of the report. c. Council member Rossbach moved to deny the project. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND d. Council member Carlson introduced the , following ,Resolution and moved its ado tion: - - - 95 _ 03 40 APPROVING PLANS AND.ADVERTISING FOR BIDS PROJECT 95 -17, TH61 WATER MAIN WHEREAS pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on January 8, 1996, plans and specifications for Trunk Highway 61 Water Main,.. Project 95- 17, have been prepared by (or under the direction ofd the City Engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:_ 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications., The. advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at 10 :00 A.M., on the 3rd day of April. 1996, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered. unless - sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount.of such bid. M -1 19 3 -11 -9F 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive., open, and read aloud bids received. at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular City Council meeting of June 24., 1996. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Allenspach, Carlson, Koppen Nays - Councilmember Rossbach 2. Sign Code Amendment - Residential Signs (2nd Reading) TABLED TO MARCH 25, 1997 COUNCIL MEETING 3 Lawn Irrigation Ordinance TABLED TO MARCH 25, 1997 COUNCIL MEETING 4. Loitering Ordinance - 2nd Reading TABLED TO MARCH 25, 1997 COUNCIL"MEETING 5. Professional Massage Center a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Parks & Recreation Director Anderson presented the specifics of the report. c. Councilmember Koppen moved to authorize a tering i.nto a formalss ree,ment with Sister Rosalind Gefre's Professional Massage Center to prov de rofessional massage services at the Community Center effective June 1 1996. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 6. Update on St. Paul Water Utility Contract a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. .b. Mayor Bastian moved to give conceptual_ approval framework for the preli mi nary, agreement wi th the St. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 7. Schedule Meeting to Discuss Commercial Property Study TABLED TO MARCH 25,, 1997 COUNCIL MEETING aft of the it Utility. E 20 3 -11 -9E J NEW BUSINESS .1. Project 89 -21, White Bear Avenue Improvements - Call for Public Hearin 9 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Engineer Matthys presented the specifics f i cs of the report. P c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. d. Council member Rossbach introduced the fol l owi ng Resolution and moved its adoption: 96 03 - 41 CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Maplewood ewood has received a report with • p p reference to the improvement of White Bear Avenue, City Project 89 -21, by construction of street improvements and WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized, execution of cooperative agreements for the design and construction of the improvements herein described: White Bear Avenue, from County Road C to I -694; County Road D, from White Bear Avenue to 1150 feet west. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the cost of the improvement according to the federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $2,600,000. 2. A public hearing will be held.in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 25th day of March, 1996, at 7 p. m : to consider said improvement The City Clerk shall give published notice of said hearing and improvement. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all Ke _ V S I TOR PRESENTATIONS NONE L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS NONE r. 21 3 -11 -96 M ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Past Mayors Meeting a. Councilmember Carlson moved to set March 25, 1996 at 6:00 P.M. as the date for a reception to present the pictures of former Maplewood mayors. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING 11:19 P.M. r Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk 22 3 -11 -9F AGENDA NO. Eq � l AGENDA REPORT Action by Council Endorse TO: City Manager Modified_ Rejected FROM: Sherrie Le, Human Resource Director Date RE: HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT DATE: March 15, 1996 INTRODUCTION Attached is the 1995 Human Relations Commission Annual Report for your information and review. Gordon Heininger, Chair, will be present at the March 25 Council meeting to answer any questions. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the 1995 Human Relations Commission Annual Report. tmc Attachment AGENDA NO. , F -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: March 19, 1996 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABT.F. $86,383.51 Checks #6172 thru #6187 dated 3 -1 -96 thru 3 -6 -96 $81 Checks #24301 thru #24514 dated 3 -12 -96 $119 Checks #24523 thru #24631 dated 3 -19 -96 , $135.447.94 Checks #6188 thru #6204 dated 3 -9 -96 thru 3 -13 -96 $422,201.64 Total Accounts Payable PAYRQT .T .- $271,926.72 Payroll Checks dated 3 -8 -96 $49,901.1 R Payroll Deduction checks #51073 thru #51086 dated 3 -8 -96 $321M7.90 Total Payroll $743,929.54 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. rb Attachments C:IWPWIN601AGENDAIAPPRCLI5.MAR Vill W , l7lJ+:- y..y!° 1 :.'+:.1 irl::l 1�;1 STE:: I OV: 1.6 _ . - VOt- . 1-r-Z7 -- -- C'I-•}E::C Il CvIE :a: F: VE:I'll' 0F.; I'f'E_C�I IT1 :°l JC?�•ri »t:. t••ll.1t'''11�1:::F� _ l�lw!'ll... , . .. l: r SI::F•.1:! °''!".l:l ".71 =•} At'Usl..l111" iC'I+::i!..1i•:1 ;., ' 03/01 /96 �i.�•»`�i `.y00 GROUP HE'AL.TH INC. HCITIA DEDUCTION PAY _ INS . V-4., ., 426.02 f ,. 41 1111S IhIIJr.-Y-11-1k.. f .. C'Ca1�7T71'tiar'ifl " - -- -- .._.__. 751 .65 1;� ,'; ?:�, L }. /'.`.?:L /96 5 3, 0 :! 00 ME:.DIC C1-4C 1C-I -1 f'•ti '-MA DEDIJ!CI']':)1 PAW 3 - MEDICA 'INS. DEDUCTIt 14' PDL. r- IE:.A1...Ti! »LIF f »- LII::.1�!T' it» TI-IS Is N�jr,yr 3 „• " >1- A /R INSURANCE iE :: C ON T I NUANC 1, 031 . l5 23 , s::c ": 6174 0 3/01/96 130100 D.C.A.,INC:. FE ES FOR Sf°f" iCE: 373.6'5 :'a ;'o 617 7- ._ - 0 - 3/0 1796 -- 5�'J - MO - -- 1114 lw[MAL r-FE - Z•hlSLW%r'tl+lCE HCM� r DEDUCT 1' ON -rAY _ _ -- - - -.. -__ _ 41 .1.8 I ... t:F'f': Itd al.)fit";I•�lCE PAYABI...tw 1-11: Al ... T 'I }° L.. CF'E:: DEW , 01... :1 *.I « 1.,10c). 1.0 - - - -- - -- - ------- -._.�. - - -- - -- -- .A/R Tht ;AINCE - t'0t4T71• -lUr -J K - .. ;� � -�- =' >7 50 :1.400 MADISO NATIONAL L..IFE:. C... T..D. lI- 11i , -lN.E. 2 �::4 1l` :, «�;• 61-77 0 ;/01 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL E.ESOURSE:S DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 534.00 ':;' .. ( (�a .I.:' S:, �r�- •ts�..�- �t�f��- - .. �J.:l! •,� .1. / i - G i� - - -- ...+ .t. '1Jti. +_ �.r�r -- --iii, f - -- 1'1.1.1 - • » . :. �:!t . _ . •. - -- -- - ----- �.�r�� •7�c �r•t -t- �••�• �r -�tf7� _.. if1 ti - ti.._ FE S 1" H 1 ABLE _ -- - - JCi � « 5 , 6A . ti0 r; /; 1. /`;; E; ': 't 1 •:t {'�(:� MINN. STATE TE:f A::;!:.sltiER I"It]'T'Cif�; 'tiJFI i L. I t:' F E =C ; F'i yl°A��1» I� `� , i 3•:� 1. « ji) 0 0 4 9 6. w` 4 I" I:C htht . STATE TREASURER DE1"' REG 149 , REPORT 1 66.3 - 1--96 9,253.75 r y ,': : +;:.. ":.+ .. ? . Ta,�'t1MER, � _ - - - - - - 1?fi « . - -- t 5 I..f,•.. ;�,. r:il:, �.rl , 1 ::1�AD? _�� I�I:Ct -}h1« STATE TI;EtW:;UF:kI� `:� "F1'!'E:: IJF: CJC': :Ft:i t...TC f'E ES F'r�YAI�C.E.i�i :l. «`.�:i c,.1 lklIll 0 'x': /0 5 /9 6 '5414O MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTor -z VI EH LIC FEES PAYABLE:. 13 1.�;., {) ?.�; ..41 t�:Y.i :;'": ii r1,.:.; - - ,. .. -- `'•rt:tT ? _uf)f?I1 -'� :f"f -`_- ---- _ __ f`E:I:: :'c;... F`L`IF: l'Ct`E:: __., - _ _ C;..`4 OFI: :'ICE t :3 ►..! I °� y::1 - -.:C 1: :: �:; �.. is 1 ::.1...:!: i:; E :: 1. �:: ,. " : +'�:; •T•f � f'•iS,l! ":1_. - �: . 'T�f:ifa T I �I 1: htC3- __ -- - - - ---- -- - - -- - - .1.:!."t-5 ! =•t ;r.: +t:,F.;Arjt i.11 '1;:'�...r. t-: > 71,.1 J. M r SC, IH-1 ... L..AN S COM MOD ITIES ::, « .:::i ' :_! :► :•-:1�::a...l._�= ,t•'ar:::r_�� 1�: �:: +::�!�ll�lO� � a: �i» a:r :.::� ::: ...... I :'•:► { , l :'l (T"a+sl : :a...S: '1'f":f81:Na:r40- -. 'I'i�tt'= ;�:?E::f..: t:: '('F� r• "•;:Ct-•I:CI'�•!(::+ :<':'.`�.. C:':: T}^:h'1:1.I' lI-4G -- • . _ _ ' :a:1F''l 'L..:CE : :;; :... E ::'lal.t:f'f'`t" 1: : :r. }' ' - - -- ...... ` -6 '�3!.sF�'1:�'i...1: l : : :: »" I :�i.:�t:l:l: f °'1'!l : ::I 1. e.� ..:';; <• ?.l.i:.+:? r:. r.?t- E. ti titr'�ti •::: ..i »• t t::' .. Y ... !::. � ..t... �.... ..... . ::. ? °' ::, ! ° 't`•'a rl� - '!. '... •.,.:'r? ,.': : ' i:i:' (;' .: � .� „� 61 :*)7 03/06 `+' -!1 40D MIt' NI. STAT TREAE!(.li: ;%-F.1•', MOTOR VE•.11 t »IC 1' °E:E!:i F'r.'iAP.LE F3 .�F3�.4!� !1 Iy;y:.ti; . 0e l ) 71;•;0? r r �r'CJL..Y[ FIoE-M;F'TY rr:. t°7J! -fly t"fTF; tn I1001'4 l�it'`y1_1t `- - - -- . _:._ _ _ 3.00 8.00 2 ? { -?,::;r; :° -'; ; J- 21 1"; T C'1'-1A :l) KOF:1 :1. RE::Pl.)ND 1-OF4 :* VIBS14P P :00ATE-D 159.34 :1. 59."'34 03 . :I. ;:•'. {`•: 6 .�[:sAhi 1 'I:J:F AI.II...T Refund Theater tickets 14.00 1. �T ., r lr.� Orl Refund Theater tickets - «�` ` "' 0 ;'•, -r I.2 {9 F''E:.t 11".I.» 0sl...S01 _Refund- Theater tick 0 : }.4.,, fill - TONY !•'!OF "FMAN REFUND- CO" -REC "A" VOLL..EYBAL.L. 31.00 ` 1. 00 .,;., ..;� -» r}'?77:`;.r.r, - -- - - -- - - 1'iE;S Tt- iC-_'OI}C7RE -F,'. -l;,i .1 -UND n17T 'OF ITIBSI IP ITIO to S!••II: "1• G F;EF °I iNI3 F °C31�; C1 hIl 10.00 031/ ?, /`,`6 010 A T & T PAGERS 62.82 FEE'S' FOR SERVICE 2. F38' F "CiF: 7.4' F"I= :I : : ::3 FOR S4='RV1 :CE 101. 37 TAY•. 11.2 « 1 55 :.3 ,., '} t`1 (1:"" I ^. *re,+�r - -- O1 - A T -, . T • -- - _. - - MTS - MDF`M 7 -7t',....cr1.6 .' - -... - - - -- -- - - -- - . 1.�. �f, 1.0.76 O1. t? :'5 r�C !••Ir- 1r:DWAF;1: :MAI_i... TOOLS 49.74 fi - 23 PAINT f3: M T SC . S-UPPL I ES 487.0 :1. `:il.11= 'F•I...:CE': =< - EQUIPMENT NT 1'x /9 /y Tr.' -! - _ .. -- --- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - _ .----- - - ---- - -- '•a� «fir! ClVI: :I i :'AYIvIFJ%ff' ON 2-17-96 1.0.(31 168. ' I=7 . ; n. TPt:. 8.70 C:C• T:Cr':r3 21.:1. TA r • 1 . 77 , r... r...., ,;Irk :.... :..: :: ..::. . 6 f • ,.::. fir. 11.t :.: +•.,,� r`•a ::a:3F;h! hlllTf.11:*:r!...IciT' :3 F'llfafiFr1M ::ta1= '!= 't ... l:f: ::�.� - SAT...ES TAX PBI..... O `T - -T.IF- . T!`- - -.- . w •;,1; ».. 3. CIO 24), ;:I. 020',: Ai._f:: R TE • =Yf l• EMc: I! t i + SUP PI FS) 7. r•' ::::: 1 .• :: r) • ti tl� .r - y.-? L. +1 :.1 t� ' ! ! 'y'!'�! I' !'''I r : +1.. l t l ! ! 1 I !`': 7 r tVlEP l ..,, SYSTEM Purchase P . /Monit r - ., �;. } � ,:;,:: 2 rte..... 5�; :•' % ?•..:;.i •:• f �;;* ; ;. r <;.' •, rti':'.1.:'�:tr,► t:::t:!►"!;.! t AVI F•'A I•'!`::.I''•I I 1.51 .1•' :- •t�.::3 �; :/1:::/ <. {�) 1.` + :!�� r.:i:�rarat ::Y �Al::..4.1.•t: F FUa.)► DAItI:> AID � .f . 4 r ,.. 4 _ - 075/ -.�. O{ r PADS :I.,:) __. '56 .r 9T:: i - .tnI317.1- t17.�, -- - - -- - - 37.2C �::;..t :' c: l< c ,..!l. i;r: R. +I: r'!a °t;.;l::; ��h:r'IZ•,'OF a Tr -..rl I u.JP11c1 : :.I: Jfi,,:I :: Ml.11''I1la: F4 I AI'llc :: r. IOil .J t_r!•.,!.... i FE°E : :t FOR SE : :F?V I CEO :f 3 r Cif 1= ESE :: :; h•CIIa SE ::I �� T (.:E :: ) ., 89 St.: :��).r {:r'f it }.. 'P..... 1'tX 19.68 ::.'r?�;: 1: 7 0,if 1 f9b 03 AI ::*PE RAr- 4CI::: P •l._US CAR WASH 1. 52 r 60 :I. !.7 :.. 6 �:? _ - ,.,, --•1: '? __ �"i7�a. ?9�Y ,. 0 0 --- AI -q)M,I T''FT0RF ;TtEW T 0 S PT i AI.." I <9 C PIT.: T' - I f3 i .21 :I. ' :1. r, 7." -- x,>)r « ^, t. 040 r It fnRNA-I...'. (- 'i1.JTO al:�R SIC E F.:r Mi4 I:NT /V EH1( ... E S 0 6 LOCK WORK .�49 • - FF:t°'AIF� - f� - MAIhTTfftlEl -'1TCL.:F_ _ ----- - - - - -. :C*:::I.r. 275. DON'S Jl't[•1OR ,raF:FtiVICE' CC). INC.. ` °r4' "` "' r._. :3 n: r .a /1.�:'.f { �+cr 061600 )�tAF:F+ {:hIC�Ct \tl:'r:r :thtCi t::i « ii111 " fill ?E Eh'1i ThiEE:FiChlt:j FEES 259.. �)r:) (y) ..... .. R 7 1,:) /:I. ' / / 06:1.906 !' rl l I l - ! :F�.Y `Y cr ciAl...l_.Y 571.1t�lhl TRAVEL F TRAINING 3 ( _ 5 1 : •��) �0. , KI . 24 322 03 /1 2 /96 0 % BI: RRY 1'�l COMPANY 1.�: ;CiCKE�'1`; :; 211 J10 r ��> 1 t�t r t - -r- :1. T f 1�tr MA � - . '` - 4-9r -t- f t": ; - _ _ - -.. •, _ - - - - rc?O r ;� i. a r -�rt :..'r`1..:,:'!: F F;E:I'taF! I' x'5.40 '.'I-.MIt:t._E Al...l._OWAVICE .. «+..��. 5 �. { l:.' 4 TAX 2011» ()C, 1 : ::LE::t� �'! .::C C' MOTOR REPAIR' I: F If ::.. , f,� t. : <f ��) 0 r;51. 00 k r��,i;r-*ll rac ON BUDGE l' s I GN SHOP 24 NAME BAX)G[ :: I�tt�af-,ra � : :*T* :, :�- « 9 r '• 4 1 4 03 /12/96 07 3 '00 BLUE DEL!_ ICE CREAM 0 MDSI =: « FOR RESALE 68 , 30 27 4C1 7i; , i:i i -+� !- •' �r,y ;°t �� ''"��: ,r:.. L. • 81 �::r50 ----- ��/� - PFZAD RM) Ara 11`Il.r r •fit �!�- - -- .. _ - - - -. 4 01. ? .C:. ,.t`. ._ ._. 4 V I... - M ]:1`14s r.. .t'.. - M'i!.l. 3t ur --- --.__. -._ "_. .___ _._ _- _- _- _--- .- •---- ..- .. -- - -. - TAX ._ ___ 9_ _. r�t.tr:.;:: r_:r.E _.. VEHI ;:;r:4 r P :OJECTOR FOR WINTER SURVIVAI._ 150.00 2i: 03/12/96 101.: :i«,0 BUILDERS SQUARE 3/3" CORDLESS DIZAI_L 202.42 260-'1t *-0 FE::E::I:'_-' "ITE :: CONTROI ... `:> INC:. CHEMICALS 9::1.61. 2:I. «+� TAB? 1.3 r 1 to i<: St ? ?:1�; +: ?3:C:f` s 7 0,3) l ]. 2 9 L.: :1.:1. 0080 1:MAia I lhlfa ,,iYc:il F.l I' :; C C).- :t: E_R I ... LI- t.:Yi °: 4 62. . UNIF0f %*III :, el C11_014 -IIt' G I .42 IS. 4 2 Uhll :l:-•Ctl ,'M`3 8, C:!._(._� l l:I:taf:', 03 /12/96 :110850 t�i�'i'C:i:! :at!1'I''f...]: ES °- �.�C:1ITL;I._t= 229« 12 -... t.tIIF ".:.. i :`t..:i 7 f fla:f=tf:+ _ _ - -t.". -11.°. S*UF'i 'L.I E: * ': * * VE• F'! IC, ':` 1.2 !.11''•1:11:: , i, f:::I...i :i*TF•11 : 41.20 TAX - - - 16.59 I .:.... .:., ;)...,, .I.:::. /9;.) 1 205 , 15 : f: l : ::1 I' ••FtiAI... ST ORES (TIH-4 M113 ; `i 24*. *.:; : ?;ci 02' ).FA. 96 1.40700 C OI._E : *I %I„ •f•Ri "1 E I... 1 - N( !... I'I..AI�Iht:{:I�Ii:; t:t:.'•I \ :I : :' : ": i r ";C! �'; -:;.. � :'ti:. , .:,....:. ::.,, .t YL.. L : +,)1 .� :r �i .1.. �.1 t•.: i.....f.• ., f::iil'i °:.: ,. C"(D , "Tl... r t:. "t...17111 f4f..:, _ 1 9 • « 1 9 / 3 r c'., , j-;# ., i t:_)'I' 1 :ai .:' ?' A ( "t : :: ;.:. a "+.i :.)..70 1 #.. :i : :{ ::�I ��: .I. 1': #.. :., ! °'t'' -t '1 : !' +: 1'•. �.�.: +r:.l..tl` .....+1' :- •t�.::3 �; :/1:::/ <. {�) 1.` + :!�� r.:i:�rarat ::Y �Al::..4.1.•t: F FUa.)► DAItI:> AID � .f . 4 r ,.. 4 PADS S'TEr.,.T,t-:F• r - - -- -' - - -- - _ - -- _. _. _ __. '56 .r 9T:: 37.2C BUTTERFLY CLOSUR'ES 38. 52 BA I'dDA I D S 46.. {:3 TA OUT tar' STATE it }.. 'P..... 1'tX 19.68 �)Cy «..... 0` 170` 00 D & 0 TOWING SER VICE INN r . TOW 2 VEI- !TC!_ES-1 95.86 95. 86 . �r^trr -- - - - Dental Claims - -__- - -- x,>)r « ^, t. ; - 6 181.(3." x.. DA. T !..00K R: SAFE :: LOCK WORK .�49 f`t I'A' :`: `6 :C*:::I.r. 275. DON'S Jl't[•1OR ,raF:FtiVICE' CC). INC.. RE PAIR docks @Community Center `" 767.00 �' � ^ 7(-')7. i1r::� �• , _. rf ., '.,, .., t� ., -,! I ! "`" S "y __ .. '- .1. t'1�: tl 1..•`t,.!L.•I -1 t"•.1•II:.. ry L. _ ..... .. R 7 : rr ' S ,. '.:�::C': "•.yt:� ciAl...l_.Y 571.1t�lhl TRAVEL F TRAINING 3 ( _ 5 1 : •��) �0. , KI I :" . K r t'l.lr: ::i'it._ A Ct�II:Y E hIT Envelopes 1 76 « R 0 1 76 .20 1 7ta .. 2 I :, , .� .. ► ! �.. > - - -- ':; .... _ - J10 r ��> 1 t�t r t - -r- :1. T f 1�tr MA � - . '` - 4-9r -t- f t": ; - _ _ - -.. •, _ - - - - rc?O r ;� i. a r -�rt :..'r`1..:,:'!: 1'2' 96 20 1 6 8 '.'I-.MIt:t._E Al...l._OWAVICE .. «+..��. 5 �. { l:.' 4 r 2011» ()C, 1 : ::LE::t� �'! .::C C' MOTOR REPAIR' I: F If ::.. Fi!: F'A C F ' � �?c h!'I'hlt "E" « /E�t�L4 T F'ME�hIT 220.79 'T'AX 6 22 - , t ��:. � r 4 ::Y :•� i °:ctr.'! ... ... (: +::':/ �'<'•'V... ... .... 27 4C1 7i; , i:i t ::I'!` :;F1F' MTZ ?t ail: `iT . '" F~t"F AT1�; & MAIta 1 /.:::t!ltll °'MFhdT' 75.9 .. � 9 f +.. r: ..... ;:114:,0 115r .�t'i , �._- ----__ .C:. ,.t`. ._ ._. 4 V I... - M ]:1`14s r.. .t'.. - M'i!.l. 3t ur --- --.__. -._ "_. .___ _._ _- _- _- _--- .- •---- ..- .. -- - -. - TAX ._ ___ 9_ _. P :OJECTOR FOR WINTER SURVIVAI._ 150.00 TAX 9.75 :I. . 5 , 0 :.!.:``;r'�• f.`' :::;':I. : /�`e�. 260-'1t *-0 FE::E::I:'_-' "ITE :: CONTROI ... `:> INC:. CHEMICALS 9::1.61. 2:I. «+� :�.�' ;r�' - -- - -- - r; _ �'/ ,rf"r! IN to i<: St ? ?:1�; +: ?3:C:f` s - dwr - . :L I j fi # - - -- - - -- tit4I Ffffl & . t t t ' 41. . �?;:, UNIF0f %*III :, el C11_014 -IIt' G I .42 Uhll :l:-•Ctl ,'M`3 8, C:!._(._� l l:I:taf:', 21.19 -... t.tIIF ".:.. i :`t..:i 7 f fla:f=tf:+ _ _ - -t.". -11.°. !.11''•1:11:: , i, f:::I...i :i*TF•11 : 41.20 l.�l�•! :!: I�� iaF�a''t.�: r:: f:a.. (:r;'l..l :I: t�lf:�� 1. f: „ i4; :, (TIH-4 M113 lYl1 �1 r; ::: };:} r 1. t:. "t...17111 f4f..:, _ 1 9 • « 1 9 / 3 r c'., , 14,646.36 1. 5 (' ;) . 2 r, -', 5 » 9 :a 4 -1 3f: '7- 5 1A C1 6. 7 00 41 1! 45 „ 94. 81-, p . ) 3-7() 7. Of', 1. ;x .. Q6 11719 .. 6 4 r5 100. M. 21.4.00 ' ... . .. 2 1 vi!1AC1'*HR1.:.A or. R-EGISTF-1 W . 4 T E ri ITEIYI D (:*"R I FAT I (]f4 AVIOUNT DA'U-.' 75 10 6' :., 0 GOPF-IiiJ."' D-IMPOSPAl JAN 1996 RECYCLING 14,646.36 ry !; -2/76 M-TCI--iAEI VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 21. . 5-0 9.5-1 G Ar- Ix SHOPPE A/R S 2435 '.1. 03/1.2/96 320281 GF:ANDMA'S FIAKERY... I NC CAKE 7 CAVE CAK AV 13.75 I -.S » 7,-.-*, -75 75 -13.75 ------- CAI 17 24- 3 2 03/12/96 320630 GUITAR Cl:-.*1,4TEI--,' MANAGEITIE-WT REF'AIR OF AMF'LIFIER 429.99 -TAX'- 0-7;/1.2/96 320860 H & L MESABI 6 GRADE:.-.I--,* BL(--tDF:.S 415.38 -2 TAX 27.00 410446 KELL.1 SERVICES INC. DATA EN TRY TEMP 2,5 4 . 5 9 .4104f.-O KELSEY. i:ONNIE. VEKHICLE ALLOWANCE. 15.12 2475(l") 0-371-2776--_ _413)0�50 -KNOX LUMBER' CO 0212"* -'MAINTE14ANCE -MATERIAL-__ 222.55 3 .57 0,-'F/1.2"/"?6 440100 ENT KREMUZ SPRING & ALIGNME R'ET'AIR & WUNT/VEFII�A_E 345.38 - RE-P A I r MATNT/NIEtATCLE" 765.171 '96 - 4 6 4 L5 2 LEAGUE 0i:- MINN. c. 5. 00 0 3 /`9 6 460800 L.ESCIO , INC " 1 4A 1. 1--4'f I::.I-4AI-4CF:1 PWITHT,'I Al- A 2 (30 5 TRP VFt .' P TRATf -1 T 1-4(3 VFFi1.(1*L.F:* Al... 7 0 510,'M MAPLE:W001) FIV-)KERY 5 D07. F'P,STr%TEF) 24'.*.')�* .)2` 01"VI 2/96 511 540 lylARW't*CK. p 3 k.o 1 A F,'! IA A R F I"I A -1 (3 AA 1* 11i"11-ZI E rEl" T P .;:'... { ?•: F"ECILA-1 1365 0"VI `-'-`./96 5311.61';o ME: :TROF C'OUI--4C.TL S.A.C. PAYA14LE 6 S.A.C. 68.00• --- 1` /1. A/ IP6 5 M DVIF"C"T (`f)(7*( ... ... COL.0i BOTTL.IF-Ifi ITIDISF F 'Or-',,' P'EHIPLE 424.� 50, 2-1367 03/1"y/rPYI) ,; h MT-F-11%1. STATE TREP)S ti- ER r--)TAX ISURCHARG311 TAX SURTAX r-,ETAI*N[-*:F-,' 25"0(),* 1: 1. 0 ITIT144ESOTA -r3L.UFr-r-,TI--4T -MOTO M--..T)UCTT1Df4 36.76 RA'Al 8. 4*.!'WZ 0 7;1' 1 i 754'.7-M-30 MTT*4r:.. T.-f -.L. EIVA --ITqC. Mr., K. RrEPATM-) K -PM4CE 7P LP C 00 2 " -70 - '1 0-`/1"/96 550425 MN DARE OFFICERS ASSN. SUBSCRIPTIONS P MEMUERSHIS 50.00, 'T R A V E 1 TRATMTMIM 0.00 .F:* EMERGENCY SYSTEMS, INC. R'FP61• ,' MAINT/VEI-11CLE 1, 5714.32 'J 7-.-� 6 1 6 t 0400 IyILJI-,I1C1I_1TE CO. STROBE LIGHT 89.04 TAX 5.79 630040 N . F E. I.... R. A. REG FEE F iJ14r f 370.00 755 - 0 A.. 75 6 1 A M. A D v 1) U E 13, -7.00 -6 0,7W12/96 630600 NATT01 PUSI -4AI 'NE SS URNITURE F Six adjustable conference tables 1,' 4 »96 2 9 6, - " },1. ;;;;r Cl: Tr7rl--11-401 ... OGIES) LIC 179.00 11.64 UM3. 9.00 0* 2/96 66C 0 0 I ST. PAUL CTTY OF A/R MISCELLANEOUS 5 CA 6 ( 0 .7 T In HOMIFIE AS 11:7. 0 TF011-1 INSTTTUTE TRAVEL TF-PiII-41!,11) 100.00 7 "W 661 7-n --WIRTHE R1 4 ATP C0Im'-.A1e4 171:J, HTS-UI--1TT----- '21.4.00 7" C) 6`1600 NOV;"THF: RkI FIYDRAUI ... IC P-IC1. 'S SANDIM ... ASTER TAX 212.99 STI ... T C A (3 6 17!. 5 1,110RIf STATUH-'(:3- F'OVIIH-17, UT T I ... IT I E �13 UTT I.. T T T ES U T T T 'r I Fr *H'.1 :16. "73111 TTI U ,....:L4 V F . 3 AA UT 1!... U . y .. f . I.I I.-- c, 14,646.36 1. 5 (' ;) . 2 r, -', 5 » 9 :a 4 -1 3f: '7- 5 1A C1 6. 7 00 41 1! 45 „ 94. 81-, p . ) 3-7() 7. Of', 1. ;x .. Q6 11719 .. 6 4 r5 100. M. 21.4.00 ' ... . .. 2 1 'I: TY 0F ('r it-if 'l.:k:.l:�Ji.lt.i!.� VOUC,IIr:.r:.:`Cllr '..CV r _1GxSTER _ I::0R F*l:.t-`.t. 16 i � i:P-If:a -:!'': C:F•if::i:::I- VE- F•IZ ?i::�Fi V f`r•It: ?i:iFt T�'FaYi ` ' I•ltai�lr�F -r; 1)A I*-: rt►. il�t� {I:�l i�lArrll� , : S ::.......... Jlr(` �(.r . ITEM f4tYli:il.11'-I'T' t::ii"lj:ll..Jj•'a f �•x� UT1L_ITIES 4. 40 i lt UT I I ... ITIES 3 « 14 4 103., 19 i r. 2 4 3132 0 3/ 12 /9b 6806 00 OCTOPUS WASH 23 wA,r )'! IG:"ci r, T_'I �;• 1l ASHE,13) t: 30 . 00 W ASHES* 4: TT C « .J t 0 22 24- ^ ' 33 03/12/96 692800 OXYCif -N CiC'FiVICE:: MAINTENANCE MATERIAL.. - - - - « 1.11 «:_ {::A3'84 03/1.2/96 0066 5 PAINTER PRINTS - -- - - --.. PUBLISHING _ _ 9915«00 99 t ii'j �'7,.y :} ► -- '�.} f J• t:, / T CJ - --- ._ 1 t7 7VV w --- -- ' Af - - C.: {": WMfl f:.f "IC.J4Jt:YL:. q INC. _.... � y F'F.'G�OI�.AM atlF'F• L I ES - -- - --- --- -- - --- - - - - - -- -. _ �• i 4 J« Jh 49 rT�, 243 03 12/9b 700900 PARK SUPPL..Y„ INC. SHOWER liAIIPrI_fM 98.64 TAX t« 0 t 03/ 12 / 96 7 1 2 11t, t='UL_AR CHEVROL_I::.T C: EO -REf" l.l', ';+b.1. 'RE «. ,:) "S 41 -PAIR tlhtMAFi!`:E'D 5`""i 1»;i1EV__ - -- --- - ---- - -.._. r 2 4388 03/12/96 720600 POSTMASTER S . . �ENEWAI:. 1ST CLAS Ff.ESOI'1T #404.:Y 85 r::..- .. ti 00 t! ' 4;':89 03/12 7208,'60 P IEir.I.E . WIL.i...IAM TRAVEL. & TFtiA:{:NII 7«40 VEHICL-E At._t_.0WANCl- _... ._ ;L r.). 6. °:s • j1 t„ � 4390 v n 63 12/96 rl r' 721 200 . _ • fir• PR S OURCE FITNESS' _ r s' 100L.Lc PL '} 2 POL..AR HEART HATE 90.0(1 t y 722 300 Pt 1Ml "' AND ME. Tf :Fi SERVICE I h it: « FEES FOR SERVICE- t t J ` t 24392 0 :/ 12 r'9 729200 QUEBL_O SUPPLIES -- OFFICE 196.44 1. 9 c:Y ., 114 • •- LL /�{ �; �{ I1.T I TUT:romm . _ F!-mr)sy - i - -- ,r F': «.- 369. 26 C Sti tt 3 )5" «2 `::r:::)•..;� 03z 5', b 1 ' ' ' 1':U!•d':3 1"A.ti`{ i Ihlt, r'r` �'r M t NCI- w ";S 5 0%' 780 S& f OF I ICI::. F•'F -,'O f7UC:'t : Y INC C « _ :•rf:: « - 40 « ,: t I .. , .•eta r3U1...i...l= :'F' :I N I�i7t F 11 �?c1.., r J t i . S *1...:1:1:1:.; ».. OFF I CI:: - - - -- - -- -- - 14 7 .} :. A l 8t: -`1.60 ::)1 t1 'l:i. "t "Y` !!1...E::l:::141 C:ORI TAX ti t:t !':�: 1 !" ::.::;�I ...'. 1 �. r �.. a .• ��.. ,...� ir; .. !'`! ' i�t -i • Fit ! F' F "i:aFi h'.: �.......I:r i C..:i:;:..� ! :::: :.., ..� , ....,. t 1 L,1 T ETC i :I -lE - M I C; ,1... MANUr-:_'1CTUR 1 NG � >UF•F'L_ I E :S JAN I TC1R I AL.. ��, 1 ., 99 � - . 99 _ e•� •!v1•.Ih n . • •, .y.. } I"t. YM:1_ ..___ n..: 1. r:... v r -. -_� ±.r �!. .••.. ;.. - r: 1;! ,.y ±- r` t -. .. - J'1 : , t- rTt.1::) t�R1S71"'1 iTi"F , - 7i « .__- n.rf" T'CII : T. r1 S t .:a 486. {? 2 IfV*3. }•.! „_.., ..... f... :•,: : ..z. °•.t }t, � } -•:, :r -- '- .''l.:: ° /�1::. f:�1.:); :;::';`:{ , , C•' E 1: t ) ?�FiE:Ii: ::F•!I ='F�: ,.) F�'FC1F�' w F'Cll ^IC'F:: ..C!t.1T.F' FFwF�'F`•,...F:' ,.:. hlA:l:l••i'T' /F.:t;UIF MC'NT 0 1.1. w 0,r 24502 0: 850395 SUNRAY AUTO 1 °'ARTS 81.1171:'I ... T.l:: -- VEHICL -E 1w66 St.JPPL. I E-S VEHI Ci...E 5 .6 ,. ___---------- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - - -.. --- - - -.._ __..- - - - -. ._.. ______ ._ __ - - - - -. - -._.- -------- - - - - -- - -- '')1 : ..tic'•' 24503 o s.,' 1::` 8'61.660 THE JEFFREY GROUP PURL_ 1: #:t{••I I H('3 2,995.00 24504 0 3/ 1 9 6 f. 80200. TRACY/TRIPP FUELS I NVENTORY OF SUP'P'LIES :. 1 5.,13:1.3.- . Tf' 24505 %F -133 ! rG 1 .L..�.J t. MIfS -..._ _. __:•�!►t!f - -_ ^ - - -_ _- -. - -� w 60 2205572 16 . 6 7 280!.5,573 16.67 24506 03/1:�/�; 6 � � �. �91.c � U.S. WEST DIRECT F'UB1_ISHINfi ---- - - - 17.30 - -- -- __- - - 17.7.. . 24507 ':'::x/1.2/96 = �C�r ?1.t >�'� Lll�ltFfll�:M ; UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CL.OTHING 62 91. UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 154 w 57 .08 POI P'OI...ICE UNIFORM 1.,108 BODY ARMOUR BAL -LISTIC VEST 400.00 24508 0311. 901. 300 t.lr'F'ER M I I)WEST SALES CO M I SCE= :i »_L_0 -IN ::c:lUS COMMODITIES 1.34 « Sfc` SUF'F'I_.IE'S - ,_TANITCIRIAL. 2 14w7> -- - -- - -- - - - -- - -- -- T T . HIV :7 v - - - - - -- - - -- -- TAX 13.96 371.62 t �{ � .r �'r' J. �.� : G7 - is� •1 �1•+..� d: r r� ------- - !! - i _ ^�1� tAp�• _"f:'.1.� .L 1:::_ 1.J 1: .1'... 1. __ - �.�!^ rMr, TAT! i {+- ! "I J.J;71: � 1"' l.f Tk 131::: 7A1... 1::. - - -- - -------- --- ---- -- - ._01 « [. r i .. .1. . . {. .. .C:. .c 24510 r? y /:1:' /` 6 91040t") CR'Al: ti I{a!%!I)EF- ,*S,CI•'IAEGEN VEHICLE AL»LOWANCE- 15. 96 1.5•.96 24511 n /1 ^ /96 910!00 VASKO RUBBISH SH REMOVAL FEES FOI"� SEF�VICE .82 230.82 FE :E -S FOR SERVICE- 33 0 . 76 56 j . 245.12 c }.:) /1. ^ /�b 9121.00 _. V IRTUE C'F+:INTII�IC:i �0cr„I 11� ~C .�`- 1 l0 :; •.. , FUN C1- IAC•�r1 7._ ,.. i 2451 9 .Jo :�~..1 o-- --- Wt^t171 »f': LET }S1t`I [.. •..)S . ^) 1 ::) 1 C.1 COSTS „I 24514 t) +f` 1 n'/ •fib 970 3ti0 YC.. +I..1MGf�:l: -111, �JAMI: ti « UNIFORMS Ci...i::)'T'Ni T l�Iti ^? � «'• C? '' « :�; ' V()(.JC' + ;lRE2 03/08/96 CITY OF MAPL..EWOOD PAGE 1 0 3 /15/96 08:06 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER 1::'ERIOD 16 ' i. VOUCHER/ 03/08/96 190400 i CHECK C HE- C K VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM -.-CHE' NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT STATE TREASURER .,03/0.7/96 541400 MIMNaTAIE TREASURER _ MO jQR V EH L_IQ FEES PAYABLE 7.269-25 _ - 6199 03/07/96 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 553.00 55 3.00 6190 03/08/96 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR TITLES 27.00^_7.00 ' i. 6191 03/08/96 190400 DEPT. OF N TUFAL R SOURSES DNR LICENS9 FEES PAYABLE 373.00 373.. .. 00 6192 0:3/08/96 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 4 v 073.50 4 , 07,s . 50 6193 03/08/96 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 870w50 870.50 6194 0 3 /08/ 96 _,- _ _ 72 2200 P E . A. PE 'A EDUCTION PAYABLE 3 59 ", 3 r 6196 03/11/96 6197 03/11/96 6 198 03/12/96 6199 03/12/96 6200 03/12/96 6201 03/13/96 6202 03/13/96 6203 03/13/96 6204 0:3/1.3/96 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES. PAYABLE 1„018.75 1 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 9 9 5 � 3 HEALTH PARTNERS REFUND DUPLICATE PAYMENT 419.36 4:19.36 890900 U . S . WEST COMMUNICATIONS 731 -'9811 24526 03/19/96 160.89 REFUND 21.00 ...I.. �0 2 r 731-9830 TREASURER 151.14 12,616„10 12,616.10 541400 7 70--- . 9929 TREASURER 53.63 784.50 78 4.50 200830 7779838 5,.} . EY) gymns 150.00 150.00 7779937 5 3 .63 77691.47 2 1':3. t.12 7709959 71.73 - -_ - - - -- _ 760.11 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 776.00 176.00 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 9 9,278.25 2452 03/19/96 MOUNDS PARK ACADEMY OVER PAID GRP FEE 14.40 14.40 t 24524 03/19/96 TIM HICKEY REFUND- -SFTBL OVERPAYMENT 150.00 150.00 24525 03/19/96 NICK GUETTLER REFUND- -SFTBL CANCELLATION 150.00 1:.:0.00 FEDERAL_ INCOME TAXES PAYABLE 28, 56 �- - - - -- 24526 03/19/96 NANCY --' oikIS REFUND 21.00 ...I.. �0 2 r db t ='ERA CONTRIBUTIONS 17 :a0 , (349.41'....._ .. l 6 62251 N08WEaj BAHK MINNESOTA F.I.C.A. PAYABLE 14 FEDERAL_ INCOME TAXES PAYABLE 28, 56 FICA CONTRIBUTIONS 14,414.95 56 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 12,616„10 12,616.10 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYaBLg 784.50 78 4.50 200830 DIRKSWAGER COLLEEN CHANG E - Carver /Edgerton gymns 150.00 150.00 db I Vi: UCHREZ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 3 1 '5 / 9y 6 M3:06 VOL)CHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR r-:'ERI OD 16 (Aff'.. c K CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 24527 03/1.9/96 ROSE AUSTAD CLASS REFUND 60.00 60. 24528 03/1.9/96 MILTON SWANSON 2 DEF DRIVING REFUND 16.00 16.00 245P9 03/1.9/96 021000 AMER'I-DATA SYSTEM COMPUTER 3,201.39 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 23.00 JAX 1.50 3o225. 24530 03/19/96 021250 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY MAT SERVICE 40.74 40.74 24531 03/19/96 021.500 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW MEMB DUES 40.00 40.00 24!-532 03/19/96, ! 230660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC. I.Feesr),--f-oar service 841.01. 841.01 2-.4533 03/19/96 041500 ASPEN MILLS UNIFORM FOR JOHN HEWITT 232.50 DISCOUNT 11.63- 220.87 24534 03/19/96 060350 B&S INDUSTRIES MEDIC SUPPLIES 131.56 131.56 24535 03/19/96 061100 BANNIGAN & XELLY P.A. LEGAL FEES 7' 7 24536, 03/19/96 0732.00 BLUE BELL ICE CREAM CQ. ICE CREAM FOR RESALE 95.60 95.6-0 24537 03/19/96 090600 BREDEMUS HARDWARE CO., INC. CARVER LOCK CHANGES 55.00 55.00 24538 03/19/96 101350 EtUlLbERS SQUARE ELEC CORDS 20.12 TAX 1.31 21.43 24539 03/19/96 1.101.50 C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES FEE FOR CREDIT SERVICE 10.00 10.00 24540 03/19/96 110390 CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP COMPANY PREINKED STAMPS 68.00 TAX 41.42 72.42 24541 -.03/19/96 110850 CATCO FILTER, CLEVIt KIT, SHOCKS 296.74 TAX 19.29 316.03 24542 03/19/96 120515 CENTRAL STORES SUPPLIES - OFFICE 93.53 TAX 6.08 OVERPAYED CK #23982 50.00- 49.61 24543 63/19/96 130200 CHANDLER SIGNS, INC. ESCROW REFUND 14 ,INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 105.89 14 24544 03/19/96 151350 COMPUCARD INC. PVC CARDS 15.48 TELE SUPPORT 56.25 71.73 24545 03/19/96 1.51830 CONNEY SAFTEY PRODUCTS FIRST AID KITS 65.96 FIRST AID KITS 651.96 BLANKET 36.95 J BLANKET 36.95 5 ENVIROCTDE 45.50 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAP'LEWOOD PAGE? � 03/15/96 08:06 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER t FOR . PERIOD 16 . VOUCHER/ 208.1 24549 I C;HEt K . CHECK VENDOR' VENDOR ITEM ITEM C _ NUM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 5 ICE PAN 87.00 1 SHIPPING 5.2 I. DUPLICATING COSTS SHIPPING 5.20 SHIPP 10 DUPLICATING COSTS 220.91 TAX 6.69 i TAX 6,.68 141.88 TAX 8.61 SALES TAX PBL. OUT OF STATE 21.98. 354.82 4547 03/19/96 181852 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE STAMP'.SET 42.38 POSTAGE 5.00 TAX_ 3 .00 50.38 - 41 !!"' TRAVEL & TRAINING 57.79 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 128.16 208.1 24549 03/19/96 230900 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY DUPLICATING COSTS 156.39 DUPLICATING COSTS 5.47 DUPLICATING COSTS 97.73 DUPLICATING COSTS 220.91 DUPLICATING COSTS 141.88 DUPLICATING COSTS 73,.93 DUPLICATING COSTS 365.85 DUPLICATING COSTS 210.35 1,272.51 24550 03/19/96 240375 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. CHECK MEDIC ? +' 3 <:..�8.50 2 «50 ' �.. 24551 03/19/96 250130 ENVIRONMENTAL MAGAZINE 1 YR MAG SU BSCRIPTION 20.00 20 .00 24552 03/19/96 260450 FEED- -RITE CONTROLS INC. CHEMICALS 736.78 736.78 f. 24553 03/19/96 300500 G 13c K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 136.22 IJN l t= (3RM RENTAL 94.31 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 45.69 CREDIT .18.00-- 258.22 24554 .03/19/96 310250 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER TIRES ON 945 3.10.:6 24555 03/19/96 310650 GOPHER DISPOSAL FEB RECYCLING 12,844.48 _310.2 12,844.48 j 24.556 03/19/96 310850 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE 96 BLDG CODE SMNR OSTROM /CARVE 60.00 60.00 r' 2 4557 03/ 1'9/96 320281 GRANR MA ' S BAKERY, INC, CAKE 13.75 CAKE 13.75 CAKE 13.75 C AKE: 1 3.75 t CAKE 13- .. MAKE 1::3.75 - 41 !!"' -r r Kai VOUC1•ir.h' 2 - CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I PAGE: ca 0.31:1. 5/96 08:06 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER _ 13 FOR PERIOD 16 c + +. VOUf.".1'-IFR/ a QIHECK - CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM XTEM Nl:.El*tE:BER DATE NUMEBE R NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AM(]lJN'T �s CKE 14.75 CAKE _ 1 3. 7 ' 24558 03/19/96 CAKE 13.75 � CAKE: 13.75 CAKE 13 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13.75 CKE 14.75 166.00 I 24558 03/19/96 320 STEVE GRIMM Theatre performance at C' C M. . $00.00 800 .00 � - - -� 24559 0,x/19/96 350700 HIRSHFIE.LDS FAINT & MISC_ 5UE'F'LIES 187.64 TAX 12.20 199.84_ 24560 03/19/ 351300 HORSNE L. YUDI H TRAVEL . TRAINING 176.00 176.,-00 24.561 03/19/96 370076 HUGHES & COSTELL..O PROSECUTION SERVICE RETAINER F 4 4 ' 24562 03/19/96 380300 I.I.M.C:. REG FEE FOR IIMC 405.00 40;5..0C? 2456 03/19/96 400650 J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC. APPLIANCES RECYCLED 302.00 302. ! 24564 03/19/96 401670 JOLLY TYME FAVORS KAZOOS /RULERS 45.00 AX 3.15 48.15_._ -.__. 24565 03/19/96 410446 KELLY SERVICES, INC. TEMP EMPLOYEE 317.36 317.36 24566 03/19/06 420108 KIMBALL MIDWEST MIRE 170.40 170.40 2 4567 03/19/96 420150 KINKO'S NATIONAL A/R COMPUTER SRVC 17.40 TAX 1.13 Is. 5;3_.- _ 24568 03/19/96 459200 LASERQUIP NON CONTRACT SERVICE CALL 50.00 50.00 24569 03/19/96 470700 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS PUBLISHING 994.97 994.97 24570 03/19/96 470762 DENNIS LINDORFF BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 1 1 24571 03/19/96 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BAKED GOODS FOR RESALE 1,059.12 1,059. 24572 03/19/96 510925 MAPLEWOOD TRAVEL CAR RENT /AIR FARE 120.00 120.00 2457 03/19/96 511300 MARTIN -AMC ALLISTER PERSONNEL EVALUATION 300.00 - -+- MINNCARE TAX 6.00 306.00 24574 03/19/96 511720 MATTHYS, RUSS TRAVEL & TRAINING 14.81 14.81 2457 03/19/96 511725 MAU GEOR Con perfo at M. C. C. 750.00 750..00 24576 03/19/96 520500 MCGUIRE, MICHAEL.. VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 450.00 450.00 24577 03/19/96 530500 MENARDS 8 TOILET SEATS 43.92 TAX 2.85 46.77 VOUCHRE2 CITY Or MAPLEWOOD PA 0 E 51 24585 03/19/96 550600 vuuutit:.K/utlLuK Kt*_uiz:ilLK MN HGHWY MAPS 80.00 80.00 24586 03/19/96 550900 FOR PERIOD 16 PLANT CONFERENCE 35.00 35 «00 T _� VOUCHER/ 03/19/96 551500 MN POLLUTION CONTROL EMISSIONS TEST 72.00 :CHECK CHECK: VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK .NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 570050 24578 073/19/96 530731 METRO CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS REGISTER RENTAL 136.96 620600 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER CASES OF LAMPS 70.10 70.10 REGISTER RENTAL 273.92 24590 03/19/96 REGISTER RENTAL I VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 28.39 28.39 24591 03/19/96 640830 TAX 71,68 1 SHIP 9.00 24579. 03/19/96 540175 MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. COKE 284.10 24592 03/19/96 661181 NORTHERN AIRGAS OXYGEN/NITROUS 147.01 MDSE. FOR RESALE .542.00 826.10 661600 24580 03/19/96 540775 MINN. DEPT. OF HEALTH MN DEPT OF HEALTH LICENSE 45.00 45.00 24581 03/19/96 5 4 0 825 MINN. DEPT. OF HEALTH AWW A 3DAY WATER SEMINAR 185.00 185.00 BRAKE SET 24582 03/19/96 540880 MINN.. DEPT. OF REVENUE SALES TAX P BL. OUT OF STATE 11.00 24594 03/19/96 681151 SALES TAX PAYABLE 11.00 63.88 63.88 24595 03/19/96 691150 ONE HOUR MOTO PHOTO "ALES TAX PAYABLE 7,148.00 -38.29 SALES TAX PAYABLE 4 SALES, TAX PAYABLE 4.00 :T A L ES TAX PBL. OUT OF STATE 43.00 12 24583 03/19/96 542200 MINNESOTA MINING & MFG. CO.. SIGNS & SIGNALS 970.51 24584 03/19/96 542630 MINNESOTA TRUCKING ASSOC. DRIVER INSPECTION BOOKS. 227.09 .09 _227 24585 03/19/96 550600 MN DEPUTY REGISTRAR ASSOC. MN HGHWY MAPS 80.00 80.00 24586 03/19/96 550900 MN STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY PLANT CONFERENCE 35.00 35 «00 T _� 24587 03/19/96 551500 MN POLLUTION CONTROL EMISSIONS TEST 72.00 EMISSIONS TEST 8.00 EMISSIONS TEST 8.00 88.00 1 4; 24L.5138. 03/19/96 570050 MOBILE EMERGENCY SYSTEMS„ INC. STROBES/REAR BEACONS ON MOBILE 228.00 228.00 24589 03/19/96 620600 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER CASES OF LAMPS 70.10 70.10 24590 03/19/96 640550 NELSON, JEAN VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 28.39 28.39 24591 03/19/96 640830 NEXT CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES, INC 2 8MB SIMMS 405.72 SHIP 9.00 TAX 26.37 441.09 24592 03/19/96 661181 NORTHERN AIRGAS OXYGEN/NITROUS 147.01 147.01 24593 03/19/96 661600 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 19.14 SILICA SAND 50.99 BRAKE SET 195.93 266.06 24594 03/19/96 681151 OFF ICEMAX BRIEF CASE 63.88 63.88 24595 03/19/96 691150 ONE HOUR MOTO PHOTO DARE PHOTO DEVELOPING 38.29 -38.29 vo,Rsc U lmn * 1m/p^ oa"m^� o � CHECK CHECK---- 24596 03/19/96 ntlmo*7 /1 10A 24607 03/19/96 780300 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE . ' _ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 711525 PAGE * CARRY CASE 418.56 VOUCHE" CHEC." R TAX 5n3s 03/19/96 820600 FOR PERIOD 16 MONITOR CABLE | 473.56 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 24599 03/19/96 VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM 'CHECK wunosn w*ns DESCRIPTION ^nouwr wnouwr / 700850 PAPERDIRECT.-INC. PROGRAM SUPPLIES 51.e5 51.85 711500 PHOTbs To oo PHOTO DEV 8.57 8.57 24607 03/19/96 780300 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE 24598 0 711525 PHYSID-CONTROL CORP. CARRY CASE 418.56 .4.56 TAX 5n3s 03/19/96 820600 WALL PLANNER MONITOR CABLE 55.00 473.56 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 24599 03/19/96 712t15 POLAR CHEVROLET GEO REPAIR.& MAINT/VEHICLE 799.39 SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 166.99 284.89 2 03/19/96 930900 SOUTTER CHECK VEHICLE 943 70.82 5.20 24612 � 03/19/96 1340300 ST.PALIL BOOK & STATION 1099 ENVELOPES 20.00 24600 0,--v)/i9/96 721.200 PRO SOURCE FITNESS DRIVE CABLE 30.56 30.56 24601 63/19/96 741200 RAINBOW FOODS CANDLES 10.26 10.26 24602 03/19/96 741300 RAMSEY-CLINIC PHYSICAL 98.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 168.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 50.00 316.00 24603 03/19/96 741301 RAMSEY CLINIC PHYSICAL 926.00 926.00 4 03/19/96 741601 RAMSEY.COUNTY LAND PURCHASE 825.63 825.63 24605 03/19/96 742525 RANGER RICK MAGAZINE RANGER RICK SBSCRP 15.00 1.5.00 24606 03/19/96 750550 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS FOOD FOR RESALE 298.92 MDSE.FOR RESALE 311B.37 24607 03/19/96 780300 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE 73.76 PAD/EASEL 70.14 LABELS/TRAYS 82.80 TAX .4.56 TAX 5n3s 03/19/96 820600 WALL PLANNER 14.26 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 61.91 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 16.27 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 55.59 'CREDIT 10052- 267.50 24608 03/19/96 780 75 SR ONS L INC GROUP. INC. OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 21 4 2l P4609 03/19/96 820600 SNAP-ON TOOLS InArNTENANCE MATERIAL 43.74 24610 03/19/96 1330775 SOUTH ST PAUL STEEEL STEEL. TUBING 267.50 TAX 17.39 284.89 2 03/19/96 930900 SOUTTER VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 5.20 5.20 24612 � 03/19/96 1340300 ST.PALIL BOOK & STATION 1099 ENVELOPES 20.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE ` 7 0.3/1 Wtj: Vb VUUUHl- K /UHl- UK KEU15TLR F OR PER 1 6 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VE DOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION _ AMOUNT AMOUNT TA X 1.30 _ PROGRAM SUPPLIES _ 13.26--- ._--- - -._ -- STICKERS 1.89 SUPPLIES OFFICE 36.75 S'T'ICKERS 37.11 TAX 6.72 - LO R SUE 14.39 CASH REG TAPE 10.44 - 141.86 24614 03/19/96 850317 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY IST HALF OF DUES 1.400.00 1,400 „00 24615 03/19/96 850340 SUMMIT INSPECTION SERVICES LTD FEES FOR SERVICE 4,108 »40 DEFERRED REVENUE ELEC.PERMIT 5 i ELECT PERMI FEES 5 5 - 4x108=40... 2461.5 03/19/96 850395 SUNRAY AUTO FARTS VEHICLE LIGHTS 144.23 144.23 246 03/19/96 851575 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC. PRINTER RIBBONS 52.01 52.01 21618 .03/19/96 86070Q TAUTGES. REDPATH & Co.. L PREP OF FIRE RELIEE PENSION PR 2 1333- 50 2 133;5. 30 24619 03/19/96 861661 THE KAHLER HOTEL ROOM DEPOSIT FOR LMC CONFERENC X07.00 ROOM DEPOSIT F R L C CQNFER9HQ 276 . 00 483 .00 246:0 03/19/96 871800 TOWER ASPHALT MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 863.30 863.30 24621 03/19/96 880570 TRI -STATE BOPCAT,INC. BOBCAT 2 2.,239.75 24622 03/19/96 880675 TROPHIES UNLIMITED TROPHIES UNLIMITED 2 32 MEDALS 96. _ -- 'TAX 6.24 PLATES ENGRAVED 18.00 T'AX ..-1.17 . ,.� _ 2,709.36 i i 24623 03/19/96 881250 TWIN CITIES MUSIC & ARTS REPLACE CK5219 935.00 935.00 i 24624 03/19/96 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 625.67 GLOVES 25.95 F' I NS 13.48 I L1N I F 'OFi M- STEFFEN 69.9.E r UNIFORM- 19 4.38 i SGT SKALMAN 50.35 UNIFORM- -CASSEM 702.36 1.682.12 46:5 03/19/96 900276 UNIVERSAL NETWORK SERVICES LD BILL 3.6.96 101.65 _ iy- - -- - - -- -- A/R -- PERSONAL PHONE CALLS 23.55 125.20 24626 03/19/96 901300 UPPER MIDWEST SALES CO. SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 269.5 1___ 269.51 .f c� CI"T" O F MAPLE r:•AGE 8 i .� /1.5 /96 08:0 V()IJCHr:::r</C:! -IECK REGI -:: ' :)U(::I••IER/ C'.HE.:CK VEND VENDOR _ __- _ -�T�M _ITEM - -- -- - - -- _ CHEC:K .'lU �11E ER DATE NUMBER t�tAl�IF" DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 2 4627 03/19/96 911335 VIKING AUTOMATIC aF'F.INKLEEi REPAIR SPRINKLER 94.0 94. »00- �- �w__•-- . -_. -.- 24328 03/ 19/96 931100 DAVID WALBRIDGE DIG FUN SHOW 200.00 200.00 ., 24c "c':'9 03/19/ 9 3:1300 WALSH, WILLIAM P. FEES FOR SERVICE 724.00 DE::FFEFRED REVENUE —E'LBG.PERMIT 905.00 PLUMBING 905.00- 724.00 24630 03/19/96 931850 WAthhlti LITkS OF MN b FLASHER HEADS 4 - 84.00 20 BULBS 6 .04 48 BATTERIES (31..60 TAX 12.01 1 24631 0 /19/96 941200 WHEATLAND, rN . SWIMSUIT DIAPERS 171.00 (y; FREIGHT 3.69 174.69 TOTAL CHECKS 254 : f '', 1,1, i 1 . : i I it i t , >1 i c� CHECK NUMBER IRECT :DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 03/08/96 ALLENSPACH,SHERRY 309.77 03/08/96 CARLSON,THERESE 1 03/08/96 BODINE,RENEE 1 03/08/96 FAUST, DANIEL F 2 03/08/96 ANDERSON., CAROLE J 1,105,16 03/08/96 DEHN,DEBORAH 759.49 03/08/96 HANG.SLEBEN,RICHARD 1 i 03/08/96 KLAGER,WENDY 1 03/08/96 VIGNALO,DELORES A 1 03/08/96 BEHM,LOIS 1 03/08/96 CARLE,JEANETTE E 1 03/08/96 JAGOE,CAROL 1,182.71 03/08/96 OLSON,SANDRA 1 03/08/96 FULLER,ELAINE 768.49 03/08/96 POWELL, PHILIP 1 03/08/96 ALDRIDGE,MARK 1,598.81 03/08/96 BECKER,RONALD D 2,003.56 03/08/96 BOHL,JOHN C 2 03/08/96 FLOR,TIMOTHY 1,563.38 03/08/96 KVAM,DAVID 1 03/08/96 STEFFEN,SCOTT L 1 03/08/96 YOUNGREN,JAMES 2 03/08/96 EVERSON,PAUL 1,473.91 03/08/96 FRASER,JOHN 2 1 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 2 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER ra m - r one r DATE r �r r r .rte EMPLOYEE.NAME r r- r r r- ,AMOUNT DIR DEPOSIT 0 3 / 0 8 / 9 6 r r r r �r SAUNDERS , SARAH mm mm am 1,541,63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08./96 ADELSON , LINDA 894.03 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 STAHNKE ,JULIE A 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 HAI DER , KENNETH G 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 PRI EFER ,WILLIAM 1,. 5 3 4 .71 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 LUNDSTEN , LANCE 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 O SWALD , ERI CK D 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 DUCHARME , JOHN 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 MATTHY S, RUS S 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 0 3/ 0 8/ 9 6 PECK , DENNI S L 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 ANDERSON, BRUCE 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 BURKE, MYLES R 1 DIRECT .DEPOSIT 03/08/96 MARUSKA , MARK A 1 9 01.0 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 GREW - HAYMAN , JANET M 7 3 0. 9 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 BARTA ,MARIE 1 2 0 9 .7 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 COLEMAN , MELINDA 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 EKSTRAND , THOMAS G 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 ROBERTS , KENNETH 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 STAPLES , PAULINE 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 ANDERSON ,MICHAEL 560.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 EASTMAN , THOMAS E 1, 9 0 3.51 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 OLSON , RONALD J 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 RATHBURN , RODNEY 441.82 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 HURLEY , STEPHEN 1 2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 3 CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 PRI EFER , LORI. 55,25 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 COLEMAN , PHILIP 4 9 8.7 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03 / 08/96 EDGE , DOUGLAS 1, 15 2.31 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 BROTTEM , TRACY 148,13 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 CROSSON, LINDA 989.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 HOSCH,JESSICA 128.88 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 SCHONES , DUSTIN 132,00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 LIVINGSTON , JOYCE L- 679.08 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 KNAUS S, PETER 718.10 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 SALITROS , DARLENE 642.87 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 CURTI S, CARL D. 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 PALMA , STEVEN 2 93 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 JOHNSON , KEVIN 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 BARTEL ,DENI S E 1 2 9 6.31 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 WARMAN , ROBIN 691.38 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 BEHAN ,JAMES 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 HANSEN, LESLIE 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 AURELIUS , LUCILLE E 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 AFFOLTER , PENNY J 859,64 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 COLLINS , KENNETH V 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 03/08/96 HURT CAROL J � 96.00 50850 03/08/96 ARNOLD,DAVID L 2 3 4 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 50857 03/08/96 BASTIAN,GARY W 352.04 50858 03/08/96 CARLSON,DALE 309.77 50859 03/08/96 KOPPEN,MARVIN 309.77 50860 03/08/96 ROSSBACH,GEORGE 309.77 50861 03/08/96 CASAREZ,GINA 1 50862 03/08/96 DAWSON,CRAIG W 2 50863 03/08/96 HENSLEY,PATRICIA 34.86 50864 03/08/96 LE,SHERYL 2 50865 03/08/96 MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A 3 50866 03/08/96 SCHAAL,GAIL S 360.00 50867 03/08/96 ZICK,LINDA 276.00 50868 03/08/96 PIEKARSKI,GREGORY J. 44.63 50869 03/08/96 CUDE,LARRY J 348.00 50870 03/08/96 MIKISKA,WILLIAM 216.80 50871 03/08/96 OSTER,ANDREA J 1 50872 03/08/96 MATHEYS,ALANA K 1 50873 03/08/96 FRY,PATRICIA 868.37 50874 03/08/96 JOHNSON,BONNIE 595.57 50875 03/08/96 KELSEY,CONNIE L 815.46 50876 03/08/96 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1 50877 03/08/96 MARTINSON,CAROL F 1 50878 03/08/96 PALANK,MARY KAY 1 50879 03/08/96 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1 50880 03/08/96 RYAN,MICHAEL 2 4 5 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 50881 03/08/96 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1,653.35 50882 03/08/96 BANICK,JOHN J 2 50883 03/08/96 BARTZ;PAUL 1 50884 03/08/96 BELDE,STANLEY 1 50885 03/08/96 BOWMAN,RICK A 1 50886 03/08/96 DREGER,RICHARD C 2 50887 03/08/96 DUNN,ALICE 1 50888 03/08/96 HELLE,KERRY 1 50889 03/08/96 HERBERT,MICHAEL J 1 50890 03/08/96 HIEBERT,STEVEN 1 50891 03/08/96 LANG,RICHARD J 1 50892 03/08/96 NELSON,ROBERT D 2 50893 03/08/96 RAZSKAZOFF,DALE 1 50894 03/08/96 SKALMAN,DONALD W 2 50895 03/08/96 STAFNE,GREGORY L 2,206.45 50896 03/08/96 STILL,VERNON T 1 50897 03/08/96 STOCKTON,DERRELL T 1 50898 03/08/96 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 1 50899 03/08/96 THIENES,PAUL 1 50900 03/08/96 WATCZAK,LAURA 1 50901 03/08/96 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 1 50902 03/08/96 ANDREWS,SCOTT A 1 50903 03/08/96 BERGERON,JOSEPH A 1 50904 03/08/96 DOWDLE,VIRGINIA 1 5 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 6 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 50905 03/08/96 HEINZ,STEPHEN J 2 50906 03/08/96 KARIS,FLINT D 2 50907 03/08/96 MEEHAN,JAMES 2 50908 03/08/96 MELANDER,JON A 1 50909 i 03/08/96 RABBETT,KEVIN 2 50910 03/08/96 THOMALLA,DAVID J 2 50911 03/08/96 VORWERK,ROBERT E 2 50912 03/08/96 HEWITT,JOEL A 2 50913 03/08/96 EMBERTSON,JAMES M 1 50914 03/08/96 BOYER,SCOTT K 1 50915 03/08/96 FEHR,JOSEPH 1 50916 03/08/96 FLAUGHER,JAYME L 1 50917 03/08/96 HALWEG,KEVIN R 2 50918 03/08/96 LAFFERTY,WALTER 1 50919 03/08/96 PETERS,JILL 1 50920 03/08/96 RABINE,JANET L 1 50921 03/08/96 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1 50922 03/08/96 KIRWIN,HELENE 494.46 50923 03/08/96 DARST,JAMES 1 50924 03/08/96 FREBERG,RONALD L 1 50925 03/08/96 HELEY,RONALD J 1 50926 03/08/96 KANE,MICHAEL R 1 50927 03/08/96 LUTZ P 1 50928 03/08/96 MEYER,GERALD W 11439.19 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 7 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER r+�rrr�rr� rrr DATE rr�� rrrr EMPLOYEE NAME rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr AMOUNT 50929 03/08/96 rrrrrr�rrrrrrrrrrr NAGEL,BRYAN 1,358.07 50930 03/08/96 RUNNING,ROBERT 949.11 50931 03/08/96 ELIAS,JAMES G 1, 621.91 50932 03/08/96 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 1 50933 03/08/96 PRIEBE,WILLIAM 1 50934 03/08/96 BRENNER,LOIS J 1 50935 03/08/96 KRUMMEL,BARBARA A 670.61 50936 03/08/96 ANDERSON,ROBERT S 1 50937 03/08/96 HELEY,ROLAND B 1 50938 03/08/96 HINNENKAMP,GARY 1 50939 03/08/96 KIESLING,FRANCES M 150.00 50940 03/08/96 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 1 50941 03/08/96 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 1, 341.95 50942 03/08/96 SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES 1 50943 03/08/96 HORSNELL,JUDITH A 856.04 50944 03/08/96 HUTCHINSON,ANN E 1 50945 - 03/08/96 KUNDE,MARGARET 173.44 50946 03/08/96 MACY,RITA 108.00 50947 03/08/96 NELSON,JEAN 811.25 50948 03/08/96 SOUTTER,CHRISTINE 36.81 50949 03/08/96 MISKELL,NANCY 526.02 50950 03/08/96 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1 50951 03/08/96 ERICSON,JAMES 120.00 50952 03/08/96 ANDERSON,EVERETT 937.91 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 8 CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 50953 03/08/96 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1 50954 03/08/96 OSTROM,MARJORIE 1 50955 03/08/96 WENGER,ROBERT J 1 50956 03/08/96 ANDERSON,BERNARD 58,00 50957 03/08/96 ANZALDI,MANDY 41.81 50958 03/08/96 BLANDA,STEPHANIE M 78.00 50959 03/08/96 BLOOMER,JUSTIN 40.00 50960 03/08/96 BUCKINGHAM,PAUL 30.00 50961 03/08/96 CHASE,TANIA 203.00 50962 03/08/96 DANIELSON,SCOTT 30.00 50963 03/08/96 FEUCHT,KENNETH 30.00 50964 03/08/96 FRANK,PETER J 146.25 50965 03/08/96 HORNER,MATTHEW R 80.00 50966 03/08/96 LINN,ERIC G 40.00 50967 03/08/96 LINN,MATTHEW 0 40.00 50968 03/08/96 LUNA,BRIAN 150.00 50969 03/08/96 MACK,DAN 40900 50970 03/08/96 MANI,ANDREA D 77.00 50971 03/08/96 MCPARTLIN,TERRENCE 30.00 50972 03/08/96 PRIEFER,BRIAN W 71.50 50973 03/08/96 RYDEEN,JENNY 26.00 50974 03/08/96 RYDEEN,SARAH 52.00 50975 03/08/96 RYMER,MARC 30.00 50976 03/08/96 SIVERHUS,TIMOTHY 80.00 8 01 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER ............. DATE -- - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------- ----------- AMOUNT 50977 03/08/96 - - - - -- ------------ STIEN,MARY - - - - -- 404.43 50978 03/08/96 WARD,ROY G 490.40 50979 03/08/96 BREHEIM,ROGER W 1 50980 03/08/96 EDSON,DAVID B 1 50981 03/08/96 GERMAIN,DAVID 1 50982 03/08/96 NADEAU,EDWARD A 1 50983 03/08/96 NORDQUIST,RICHARD 1 50984 03/08/96 THOMAS- JR,STEVEN 1 50985 03/08/96 ATKINS,KATHERINE 501.55 50986 03/08/96 COONS,MELISSA 649.78 50987 03/08/96 COURTEAU,BARBARA 230.75 50988 03/08/96 DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M 1 50989 03/08/96 EDWARDS,MARY P 169.00 50990 03/08/96 ESTEVEZ,DIANE 122.40 50991 03/08/96 GLASS,JEAN 597.37 50992 03/08/96 GRAF,MICHAEL 766.71 50993 03/08/96 HOIUM,SHEILA 538.19 50994 03/08/96 HUGHES,JILL 91.80 50995 03/08/96 KELLY,LISA 491.36 50996 03/08/96 MEINKE,JENNY 182.25 50997 03/08/96 PETERSON,KAYLENE 671.43 50998 03/08/96 PETERSON,RICHARD 382.99 50999 03/08/96 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 297.50 51000 03/08/96 SOLUM,PETER B 175.50 01 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 10 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 51001 03/08/96 ARCAND,CHRIS A 133.25 51002 03/08/96 BADEN , MATHIAS 261,00 51003 03/08/96 BASTIAN,ALEX 150.00 51004 03/08/96 BECKER,VALERIE M 120.00 51005 03/08/96 BERGEN,SUSAN M 129.00 51006 03/08/96 CALLEN,JENNIFER 31.50 51007 03/08/96 CHAPMAN,JENNY A 210.00 51008 03/08/96 CONLIN,PAMELA 18000 51009 03/08/96 DAMIANI,ROBERT 196.00 51010 03/08/96 DOTSON,ALISHA 265.75 51011 03/08/96 DRIVER- YOUNG,VICKI 117.25 51012 03/08/96 EGGEN,ERIC J 108.50 51013 03/08/96 FLANAGAN,MICHAEL D 88.50 51014 03/08/96 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 108.00 51015 03/08/96 HANKA,CYNTHIA 21.75 51016 03/08/96 IKHAML,JOHN 334.56 51017 03/08/96 ILLI,SARAH 114.00 51018 03/08/96 ISERMAN,MICHAEL L 187.50 51019 03/08/96 JENSEN,MATTHEW + 648.61 51020 03/08/96 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 114.00 51021 03/08/96 KASMARIK,DANIELLE M 108.00. 51022 03/08/96 KAUFMAN,GINA 419.45 51023 03/08/96 KLETT,ANNA 305.76 51024 03/08/96 KOEHNEN,MARY B 354.00 CHECK NUMBER 51025 51026 51027 51028 51029 51030 51031 51032 51033 51034 51035 51036 51037 51038 51039 51040 51041 51042 51043 51044 51045 51046 51047 51048 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 11 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 03/08/96 KOEPKE,JENNIFER M 288.00 03/08/96 KRAEMER,JILL 668.05 03/08/96 LIVINGSTON,KELLY 439.25 03/08/96 LUHRS,BETHANY L 247.50 03/08/96 MAJKOZAK,MICHELLE 108.00 03/08/96 MARUSKA,ERICA 167.40 03/08/96 MEISEL,TAMBREY 52.50 03/08/96 MCGRUDER,DONALD E 210.00 03/08/96 MCQUILLAN,ANNE S 40.00 03/08/96 NORTHQUEST,JONEEN L 90.00 03/08/96 OWEN,JONATHAN 57.00 03/08/96 PEGO,JOHN M 227.50 03/08/96 PLACHECKI,MELISSA J 30.00 03/08/96 POWERS,JESSICA 323.26 03/08/96 SELIN,JONATHAN 115.50 03/08/96 SIVERSON,OLAF L 210.00 03/08/96 SMITLEY,SHARON L 36.00 03/08/96 SWANER, JESSICA 129,00 03/08/96 THIBODEAU,KELLY M 553.55 03/08/96 WARNER,CAROLYN 36.00 03/08/96 WEDES,CARYL H 72.00 03/08/96 WESTBERG,JENNIFER 51.00 03/08/96 BOSLEY,CAROL 130.00 0.3/08/96 CHRISTENSEN,JODIE 293.62 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 12 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 51049 03/08/96 FERRIERE,SONYA L 133.25 51050 03/08/96 FRANK,LAURA 114.00 51051 03/08/96 JOHNSON,ARIEL 87,75 51052 03/08/96 LEHNEN,LORI 106.31 51053 03/08/96 MCDILL,LAYL M 56.25 51054 03/08/96 OLEARY,VIRGINIA 76.13 51055, 03/08/96 RENSLOW , RI TA 135,00 51056 03/08/96 SANCHEZ,HELEN 26.80 51057 03/08/96 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 269.50 51058 03/08/96 ANDERSON,MICHELE 162.50 51059 03/08/96 AUER,DANIEL 258.45 51060 03/08/96 BAILEY,DEANNA L 196.85 51061 03/08/96 CHRISTENSEN,JANET 319.04 51062 03/08/96 ERSFELD,ALICE L 148.80 51063 03/08/96 JAHN,DAVID J 1 51064 03/08/96 JAQUES,THOMAS - 56.44 51065 03/08/96 KELLY,CASEY 148.80 51066 03/08/96 LATHAM,BETTY 459.65 51067 03/08/96 MILLS,DEREK 80.60 51068 03/08/96 SCHLINGMAN,PAUL 1 51069 03/08/96 SWANSON,LYLE 1 51070 03/08/96 SWANSON,VERONICA 656.99 51071 03/08/96 MULVANEY,DENNIS M 1 51072 03/08/96 SPREIGL,GEORGE C 11393.11 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 13 CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS 271,926,72 F___ ;Z MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: James Ericson -- Planning Intern SUBJECT: Carver Elementary School CUP Review OWNER: Independent School District 622 LOCATION: 2680 Upper Afton Road DATE: March 12, 1996 INTRODUCTION E ndo - me d...- odif i e c� ,- ,.�._....�.w. ]R e j e c t e d.�.,, Date The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Carver Elementary School expansion is due for review Refer to the maps on pages 2 and 3. BACKGROUND On December 19, 1994, the city cou ncil authorized approvals with Independent School District 622 for the expansion of Carver School gym space. The council approved a cooperative agreement with the school district to share in the costs of this expansion. On March 27, 1995, the city council approved: (1) a conditional use permit to expand the school, (2) the design plans dated January 18, 1995, . (3) a waiver of the screening requirement for rooftop mechanical equipment, and (4) an underground lawn . sprinklering variance. DISCUSSION The school distrcit is meeting all of the conditions of the CUP (included for reference beginning on page 5). While all work has been Completed in accordance to the plans stamped January 18, 1995, the site plan on page 4 shows a significant amount of work not done. This is due to a provision in the plan which allowed the school district to implement many of the items .contingent upon funding availablity. Some site cleanup is still needed since the construction finished. RECOMMENDATION Review this permit again only if a problem develops. PA ... \sec1- 28\carver.rev Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line / Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. CUP Conditions LOCATION MAP 4 N 2 Attachment 1 *• w f i 0 Z REM 0� N �•' .J ti AVE. •. • • t �► 27 2a � :,.. ' ' CONWAY AVE. ° FROM TAGE RD, - + ;. � 209 1011 �c N 240 ' '• r J . .� lb 236 '••• �• • 207 a N N n N �+ N N .. 102 .♦ 04 N e N 201 230 p 220 7.22 HVp • • , TOnnwo L,ok� rM • HUDSON PL - ,.• z W pR. •.. • ' ' z R CREEK •1 JAMES _ A a z W — , •• • . ` UPPER AFTON RD. LL. .. .. • . O S . •• o LOWER = y . ' ' ~ RAM SEY COUNTS' CORRECTIONAL El FACILITY ` •. ' LONDIN LA. .:.. .- :�� HIC � POND 0'DP►Y ' ' �►+ W . .. •: cr_ p o CU KHVC �, O'DAY A o AVE ••. Co O • LA RD. CIR. o IL .• • _ CRES"TVIEW �• 8 D DR. FOREST • ''.. "l ` CT. $ OAKRIDGE DR. DR. . _ W _ HILLWOOD _ :3 •. . .,•, LOCATION MAP 4 N 2 Attachment 2 an Zo 13 W iD 10 ��• ; • r �'' ti �► � 3 � .. 13� . 3 4 0 0� 6"s, 9N o g limp Le o 0 6_ 6 0 � o O e� �`t o - �► �► 6 ro - 1 I 30 ..o . 136 �3 3 �� 13S �' 133 3c . 1 4% 3� 1 UPPER AFTON ROADWE w M S.5 a,, . r , } ! in r trf ?.3 - 75 ac . +� (1) � 110 dJ 7 5 SCHOOL DI�4 �,�22 /sl CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL F?A1 ti S E `i" COUNTY OPEN SPACE i ........� �...� _ ! Li 14. . I N of ' 7 15. ; FUEL STATION 2 CLIN 1C SA- u 0 Fp lmh lonl *4 in I t2o 0 COMMERCIAL CENTER � nth hunch dF e � LUTHERAN CHURCH OF PEACE PROPERTY LINE 120NING MAP 3 4 N W 1 5.4 a ?0 4 H w• a D J ON '. 1 0 O.N 34070 J . 91 ac _tn__ - z (c.7:�ac. • W 0 V (7) n75 . Z7arc. ! . lo3ac.. X90 `75 � Oir PROPERTY LINE 120NING MAP 3 4 N Attachment 3 1 PROPOSED 37 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPADES (Not Done) norm M Mme.... 1 i .ftj Lao (Fields Not Done) 0 1 1 [ 7Z q PROPOSED GYM (ALTERNATE ##1) PROPOSED GYM (ALTERNATE ##2) (Both Done) 1 -18 -95 SITE PLAN CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4 .... .............. ;. ADD LANDSCAPING HER ............ . - -- - -,� «. - (Not Done) .6. . CHANGE SERVICE DRIVE Not D ( one) I lk i ROAD� � 1W 1 o I 1 ... ........wc.........1.... 1 .., -A aw www. I I 37 SCHOOL D ADDITIONS PROPOSED (Done) 4 N E 95 - 0 3- 38 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Independent School District No. 622 is requesting that Maplewood approve a conditional use permit to expand a school WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2680 Upper Afton Road. The legal description is: Beginning at a point twenty (20) rods west of the Northeast corner of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter (N 1/2 of the SE 1/4) of Section One (1), Township twenty eight (28) , Range Twenty Two (22); thence South forty (40) rods; thence West forty (40) rods; thence North forty (40) rods; thence East forth (40) rods to the point of beginning. (RIN 01- 28 -22 -41 -0005) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows 1. on March 6, 1995, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this permit 2. On March 27, 1995, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The City approves this permit because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air ollution, drainage, water off, vibration, general unsight iness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 5 3 -27- 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and sceni features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 10. The City Council may waive any of the above requirements provided the Council determines that the balancing of public interest between governmental units would be best served by such a waiver. Approval is subject to the fol lowing conditions: 1. All construct shall follow the plans stam ed January 18. 1995 and the utility, grading and erosion contro plan stamped March 9, 1995 a s approved by.the City. The Di rector of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed Construction must be started within one year after Council approval or the permit shall end. The Council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The City may require additional parking if needed. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all Design Review i. Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the design flans stamped January 18. 1995 and the utility, grading and erosion control plan stamped March 9� 1995 for the Carver Elementary School expansion, subject to the followin4 conditions: 1) Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. 2) Submit the following for staff approval before the City issues a building permit: a) A revised site plan showing 18- foot -deep parking stalls or 2- foot -wide non -grass areas next to the curbs for' vehicle overhang. b) A plan showing the design of the trash dumpster gate. The gate shall be 100 opaque. (code requirement) c) A revised landscape plan showing: (1) Screening north of the westerly parking lot that is at least six-feet-tall, (2) Additional evergreen trees on the northeast corner of the existing school to help screen the new service drive from the homes to the north. (3) Sod on all disturbed areas. d) A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan for the City Engineer's approval. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control Handbook. this plan shall have a catch basin on the north side of the proposed expanded parking lot. 6 3 -27 -0 F -3 MEMORANDUM e .Aotlon by Counc TO: City Manager Endorse James Ericson - Planning Intern Modifi.e SUBJECT: Mounds .Park Academy CUP R eview �' y Re j ectcd...,,. LOCATION: 2051 Larpenteur Avenue DATE: March 15, 1996 Date INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Mounds Park Academy is due for review. Refer to the maps on pages 3 and 4. BACKGROUND On April 27, 1992, the city council approved a revision to the conditional use permit for Mounds Park Academy to build two additions and expand their recreation areas. (See the minutes starting on page 5.) On November 14, 1994, the city council reviewed the conditional use permit for the academy. The cou ncil required a review again either six months after Independent School District 622 completes their proposed access road to Beebe Road or in three years, whichever is first. On June 12, 1995, the city council approved a CUP and the design review for Independent School District 622. This was so the school district could expand their parking lot and reroute their driveway to Beebe Road. DISCUSSION The city council should review the academy's CUP since Independent School District 622 recently completed their access to Beebe Road. The school will be carrying out the expansion shown on the site plan dated January 14, 1992 in two phases (refer to page 4). Phase One included the building expansion and renovations. Phase Two includes the exterior recreational and athletic facilities. Mounds Park has finished Phase One but has not yet started on the Phase Two improvements. According to the Academy's athletic director, they hope to build four of the eight tennis courts this summer but funding for the other. athletic facilities is not now available. As such, the Academy does not expect to complete the second phase site work in the near future. The academy is meeting all the conditions of the CUP. RECOMMENDATION Review this permit again only if a problem develops or if the academy proposes major changes to their site plan. P:1...1secl 41moundpk. rev Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line / Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. 4 -27 -92 council minutes ro v ° EDGEHILL RD. 65 J DEMONT AVE. d "BROOKS CL AVE. EL �fWT}.� �•+ $=w AVE. ol o r GERVAIS V z CT. W - Y L J Q 00. r d Lake CAST :.E AVE. 01 C) AVE. COPE AVE. !� z LARK AVE. a LAURIE RD. MARI LAURIE RD. V; / AVE. d U 0 I I 6 f 0 Now. �O r G J k VVAMSVR z 6� n lo t O 1 s o z! : E cry ►�1o�r W_ RAMSEY COUAITY N( IRStNG HOOF ANn NORTH SA/NT PAUL LOCATION MAP 2 ow Attachment 1 LJ N Attachment 2 _ _ ■ at a,� �■ n ■ m m a iii li Oil 216 19 2 o 2, o • .S. >•1,1 es � 1 •, �� . 2jo'> �i 'r -. .3f�•` . .yy,t. p'l'y l ; 1 �"� (2g12� wit \ I � cp ►a .' , ,,r i ' 11 �( S�• 17, 4 7 SST 7.3' 2I i2 � '.+ -s l ' v 5 1 21( I 7 \✓ f 22 cz O ;i Fs�, � dF a, •.� � c, it •' � //''��T_� _ � � Ii L3 • � _�. `/' 1 85 to 4 ( /� :�•'•{,��•� 1 �'. �N� .' ' E� �� r�� 1~ • SO IRSE :• :•:,.: : :•.. : :•:•:•::::• I n 20.1 �.c . �. }!::; �:�3:� }:.�:::;,.;.;�, !:!::!:�:.v':•'•:•r. : :• 4 O 3 x** ............... K; '*'*"V XX go �, ;:; :• ! :tiff : : :• :• :• :b• :• :•r :•:S' ,'�� ;�!�;'''!:':'••''! : % %: � :.;� :! ::• :� •: i!:•::.• :. :: f .X :..:.:.:•:•:.:•:.: •• '.''. .•..�': ii'' PU D "'5 .%��gN.- gg ,��,�• ono X..K.K. mi...NK X. 7 i � h .;�;�; ;:�:;';'': re ,: ?: •'��+�. (.381 ��— t ,�:. +��+ti•.��: :.;':�....• i „ , W•U�oo�i � pt l�nG ��'. _ L3aP ?. 7 8 9 10 I I 12 13 14 t--► •: ;. :?'�, ;�P:•:f .:.: %! :..X :�f: :;..•:•: S:•:•:•. : .........................Y:.•: 3 22 21 20 19 18 17 1 16 I 15 :;i }:� ;••'•''•:;: '�� (40) 't +' r • I ,�e�s' �,'�.�1 4 {;3.•:!;�; :::';:• ;'•' ::•;: :::: . or 2.8S�e 12 II 17 �- AV E. ::?•'!' �;::;..:. I )j aK) t•1S �a.., ai. sae, +S s s. , •: .� vpO >•, . �+ J ( 1 l .: ....,.t:; 3 1 10 ul r t r I ::•:.• :..! :•:.•::!:•:•:•: :•:•::`: :.•: {: t li! % .. n. ./' 0. :�i•: i�i!i!ii�• � i �.:_ % a 9--: �••:.•::.• .. y.� ul !7C ?�;::r,'.,.;., '• }!:�1�:� ' ` 3 Po op Lit I � .�... , 1ka — - ' - 9 ' - -- T1 .. t5G PSG "•• :•:•::! ! ri A A CIO V5 � _�7� Q — .. _ _ _ : + - - - � ,6. .!.•.! �:;:!:;:! r:•; :!:!:!'r:= :!:',::!::sti•,:!:.�!' � � 8 .1 �S !:1«^..1 � .,� yRCt Ism PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP N 3 HOLLOWAY L LCD WAY �1V E. Attachment 3 C 7 --~ 1 ' • 1 1 _ PROPOSED SOCCER FIELD c PROPOS :,r Ole ; BALL FIELD rd .:J . PROPOSED _ d CO URTS � TENNIS T__ PROPOSED' HOCKEY RINK PROPOSED ADDITIONS (C ot,te) • L III` � .�•.. . .- .;. � �.. 1� • ,111 � � � . � �__;.,_ 1 I 1 . .� { ,� � c =< ':' i �, ' i,, —�, \ `• X1 orw y i tlL_ cc • 1 1 _ 1t +r 0 1:'4 'IY < 1 LARPENTEUR AVE. EXISTING BUILDING SITE PLAN Q N 4 ATTACHMENT 4 Conditional Use Permit: 2051 E. LarPenteur Ave. (Mounds Park Academy) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: Jacob.Buxell, Architect Kathleen Wind, Assistant Superintendent of District 622 d. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92- -04 -39 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, Mounds Park Academy applied for a revision of the conditional use permit for a school. WHEREAS, they applied for this revision to allow them to expand the existing school WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2051 E. Larpenteur Avenue. The legal description is: Tracts D, E and H of Registered-Land Survey No. 396 as recorded in the office of the Ramsey County Registrar of Titles and a P arcel of land described as follows: Commencing at a point distant 33 feet West of the Northeast corner of the West 112 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29, Range 22; thence running West 26 rods thence South 22 rods; thence East 26 rods; thence North 22 rods to the point of the beginning, which lies within the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 14, Ramsey County, MN. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this application on February 18, 1992. They recommended that the City Council approve said permit 2. The City Council held a public hearing on April 13, 1992. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described conditional use permit for the following reasons: 13 5 4 -27 -92 I. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or .cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run - off, vibration, general ur.s ghtl i ness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic Congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6.. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 80 The use would maximiz, the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design, 9 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction must comply with the site p1 date- stamped January 14, 1992. The City Council. may approve major changes, after a public hearing and recommendation from the Community Design Review Board. The. Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The Academy may phase the development pl an.. 2. The City Council shall review t h i s permit one year from the date of approval, based on the procedures in City Code. The City may, at that time, direct the closure of the Price entrance if traffic problems continue. 3. The school shall turn the tennis court lights off by 9:00 p.me Only the school shall use the tennis court lights. 4. The school shall only use the area between the tennis courts and pond and the west lot line as a track or route for running during fall and spring cross - country meets. 5. The City Council may require that the Academy build a driveway to Beebe Road through the School District's property if the Academy buys the School District's building. 14 6 4 -27 -92 • 5. The City Council may require i y q re that the school chain the westerl access for evening e problem vents if they become a y seconded by Councilm ember Ro s s Bach Ayes - Councilmember s Carlson, Juker, Rossbach,.Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian e. Co nc i 1 member Za a moved t ' PP o authorize all -wa si ns at Price an b v wed in one Year_ Seconded 4 Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson Juker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays Mayor Bastian 7 15 rl-- y MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PROJECT: LOCATION: DATE: INTRODUt City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Final Plat Caves English Street Third Addition McAfee Circle and County Road B March 14, 1996 �TION :dot -ion by. Counej EndorSed Mo dif i e d.. .,. R e j date Mario Cocchiarella is requesting that the city council approve Caves English Street Third Addition final plat. Mr. Cocchiarella represents Maplewood Development, Inc. This final plat would create ten. lots for houses and one outlot for a ponding area. The plat is south of County Road B across from McAfee Circle and east of English Street. (See the maps on pages 3 and 4 and the proposed final plat on page 5.) BACKGROUND On August 22, 1994, the city council approved a drainage and utility easement vacation and a preliminary plat for ten lots for Caves English Street Third Addition. (See the preliminary plat on page 6 and the minutes starting on page 7.) On December 19, 1994, the council approved Caves. English Street Third Addition final plat subject to two conditions. (See the minutes on page 10.) On February 27, 1995, the council approved a resolution that included three actions about Caves English Street Third Addition. These included rescinding the earlier final plat approval, reinstating the . preliminary plat approval through August 22, 1998 and putting a hold on the easement vacation until the city approves a new final plat. (See the minutes on page 11.) DISCUSSION Mr. Cocchiarella bought this site from Mr. Cave to develop the approved preliminary plat. The developer has not yet started building this project. He has not yet submitted to staff the covenants or deed restrictions (Condition 4) the council required. He has met all the other conditions the council required to approve the final. plat. RECOMMENDATION Approve- Caves English Street Third Addition final plat. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The staff shall not release the plat for recording until the developer submits the final copy of the required deeds, deed restrictions and covenants to the staff. This is for staff approval before he takes them to the county with the final plat. 2. The developer recording with Ramsey County the easement vacation, deed restrictions and covenants required by the city. The wording of these documents shall be subject to staff approval. p:secl 0- 291eng l3fin .mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property LinefZoning Map 3. Final Plat 4. Preliminary Plat 5. 8 -22 -94 council minutes 6.12-19-94 council minutes 7.2 -27 -95 council minutes 2 Attachment 1 own LT DR VL AY C.- �R Pte. G ERVAIS AVE. Z HEDGEHtLL � DEMOtJT AVE. E� BROOKS AVE. BROOKS AVE � � SEX TMlT VE. 9- 1 1� �. GERYIUS � °� � � Cf V CRANMEW AVE. VIKING DR. `- SNERREN AVE Kn d lola COPE /1VE. LARK � CT. � � AVE LARK t AVE � lok� / � ° CO. < RO v► g v LAURIE RD. ��.� a LAURIE ° z RD. z `�� o LEUWO v SAND URSf � � AVE. Olm- JUNCTION b 8 �"n $ CO. R0. c�40 AVE. � BURKE AVE. o � BURKE AVf. (t) CHAMBERS ST (1 �s 6 � LDa WE AVE. � "rih..r 6 � GQ �RSE rn �,VE. BELMONT AVE. � GOL SKILL � � AV E. SKILL MAN AVE. HARRIS AVE. t; ROSEW000 AVE N. D AN AV. AVE. S. VOL co MOST SO. AVE �i F£ NTON AVE � �j�, y E $ SU MME AVE � N � � � � t; tseIE AVE. RIP LEY IK I ? Lake SO 1A OPHt A ST. C Now J � PRICE 04 0 < � O . • .. .. rid le . ', . 2 .. ::. .t. 's LOCATION MAP 3 4 N o � CON AVE U O' Q G ERVAIS AVE. Z HEDGEHtLL � DEMOtJT AVE. E� BROOKS AVE. BROOKS AVE � � SEX TMlT VE. 9- 1 1� �. GERYIUS � °� � � Cf V CRANMEW AVE. VIKING DR. `- SNERREN AVE Kn d lola COPE /1VE. LARK � CT. � � AVE LARK t AVE � lok� / � ° CO. < RO v► g v LAURIE RD. ��.� a LAURIE ° z RD. z `�� o LEUWO v SAND URSf � � AVE. Olm- JUNCTION b 8 �"n $ CO. R0. c�40 AVE. � BURKE AVE. o � BURKE AVf. (t) CHAMBERS ST (1 �s 6 � LDa WE AVE. � "rih..r 6 � GQ �RSE rn �,VE. BELMONT AVE. � GOL SKILL � � AV E. SKILL MAN AVE. HARRIS AVE. t; ROSEW000 AVE N. D AN AV. AVE. S. VOL co MOST SO. AVE �i F£ NTON AVE � �j�, y E $ SU MME AVE � N � � � � t; tseIE AVE. RIP LEY IK I ? Lake SO 1A OPHt A ST. C Now J � PRICE 04 0 < � O . • .. .. rid le . ', . 2 .. ::. .t. 's LOCATION MAP 3 4 N A t t a c h m e n'-, e'- PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP T E LJ Attachment 3 --------------- T 2 .1,4 2. mA I d Xc� ,o. CAVE ENG LISH STREET ,•,�� T 2!. R 22 R�►vSE� COVwTti 0.111 R4YSE T' CODUTy COO11r^&n% ' N•1l1339 633 i [• 567326.593 fop-%.$ THIRD ADDITION 4 i r•- 0 w 1 : ' `7�• ter♦ � =.Ji 1 a► `_� \J / /�► . � I • 4 Nh 1 1 1 1 - T 1 ` ,� ► •_� Tat ki_; , A' 1 ♦• �.. r ice! 1 •.� .. ' I I I I �� I Lv • h / < 4+ N too 33 33 t jRLI.a jc I rt Il.is�Ir31r r � 4 fx r ....► .. r 1... ..�. �. 30 •� ... • /...r •' GRAPHIC SCALE • 30 „ e ,� „� R LE:1.r�t�L' t1`.'E:, 110.00 R 7 :1 er.ozT w % • - • 14e "'os•w 16 00 - S89' 49'06rE _ L- - - - - - -r Is* ` $CALF M tW r tr I 1 f % . r • t / srxE , MC)1 50 TEST 1 f �% i 10 / n , •,�� / �. �� • L } :1: �` �� ' e) •'\t, 1A 8 Its 1o� a 1� • w"011.S Mom wp4 110N1l11ENr o •l1 {C.. E� NO 10947 WNUIL 1 MW OW X 14 . M { •' ♦ : 1 BLOCK Q�\ WOWED LEmMw WoN r n moNU14Ew SET AND I _ I d '�. I r 4 : \ !06.03 I �. _ ..t 30 L _ — 61' LICENSE f ^ ��• � S 6!'N 0!• E � � ...� 3C �p L — — — •� •• — J 76.J1! opwrs wwwy OMWVY CAST WM WOMA EM► 't I" � ��.. '� � , � �,e •< '$� •3 — seeis�2•'E j &30 ES �•! ' %: 14 fm rt ftwo or TII" KA T. T14f I ? { t r � � , �' $ '1,p,► S" uW Of M SM 1/4, SEC 10. • x I �. 9.62'1Y13 � •9 spa \. � ' T 29 R.22 5 ASSIJMCO t0 6[4R I (�\ f1 \• ;. ' �-- \ r No11*•1 er46•oe' � . I � — — — Z . e•26`50'34• e , t� `b `�, L a�'�yd r � -•• •I }' lom LvM T/ MM n+E fors ARE F- ; { 1 [ �� aw"S `Ro t " w '1'1? +t i X OWW90NS Or T►t LOT. NOT Or 04 TO , 0D E ( f J f �' �` \.. • �, ; — - — — _ wu wT tR1ES .�. I 6� - -, •13 _ + v 1V O I ITS , , e� ,':C I:l.I.4: Z L . — r 1 ; M e I , `7 S — M - — I a%~ me VMM EASEwMM AW 94Mm roftm; — S 165 � °v � ` es o � ! �• i 1. � �• ' ' / �J I • x i • I I— _ —NIL I a > _ W — I I f I I i h .Y�l I -' / / a. +sT ��7 • s �; >> \ \ \ \ . ^ 8 ' f 10 1 I iD ON AND tu IF T I /� 4 s o firo INDICATED. A e r<O►EE* um. L I _ ` 1 �/ //' Ndr36 \' I ( i �.•'c� s UWUSS - fOV,1+ uME o< 50VTw1rEST ° '- _ 1NOTTr+ 4N� �p,101•IING REAR LDt lMES 1IND R1ritT 33 I 33 '�' , / 4 Or SEC t0. T. ?f. R. 22 ` {)�y / / 10D aO . � ,01 73 A6 _ ' i� , `• F Of war LINES. UNLESS OTwE�ISE SwOwI+ ON i / y L _ _ _ .� _ �r - P - - - go `, Tw PLAT - Nsf•46 163.00 - c T� 6527 535 -M , TO 65 .^ii:L s sm"I 2f EST cm" or SECTMW 10. R JU�J�TIt�t'J i•+': E:. 7 00 Esl s epajl4, E t ra N °pOb2 �• E T . R 27- RwSEr C"IY C 1 w- 1 Q RAWSEr COum- COd10i•14TES '—T — H 176712 "o -�-- ---� -- —'�'-' --�- I E 56 W I I t A ►r .> H .. r / i I I I I A I N %-J :. :► OUT�CCT ^ '' A ' `'' �`�� ►.4 1 R n 1.t i ::' R 10 _ •x fZ .•_�.;-�:r :.�, ►.._:� ••- 2.38.91 — T— -fit-- -T � SCNOELL & •MADSON, INC. - ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS * PLANNERS SOIL TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES f �?�-• �'.' I l rf ( I ' j t' 14 PROPOSED FINAL PLAT 5 4 N CAVES ENGLISH STREET THIRD ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT . I C 4 -) ; c Scale o peno•es Mon Morwunti -I-) I C -��` J %` Baorongs art oaumec Q �� l y STRFF OWNER / DEVELO I ! T CAVE 8 ASSOCIAT - \ Q 2489 RICE STREW" O ROSEVILLE, MINNE /T I - - - I to i f L 12.200 S.F. DtffflrTION Or ►RO►S►TI •� 1f0 -/�} • •� / Lot • bloc• : Coves M.I,.A ftf..t 990004 A..ItIet. LELAND 11200 S ' 2188 - / 10 ' ' _ 10.0o�.F- i MIKIMYM ffTAAfRi 1 � .►•. - p + f0.000 S.F. f •� u g 8 10 a tE.T IRO..: YAr: tC f:Q[ YIr. t0•roo• t 000•• : ( — 30. OF LCT 19►711 FOR RLA• TAP.- i AO LAWS / 100 ! I \ MIKIMLM ASKA OF LS • 10.000 SQYARL F[LT + y t 1 R TOT 1 2 AS 1» 2180 AL NW89R LO OF SINGLE. FAMILY TS ■ 10 r � 100 S.F. , �� \ AtSRA6L L0T AREA ■' l0.Ot0 f0- FT. t i— ....�07 IL200 Sf. I \' 1 J TOTAL ARE• • •.I ACRE � � ....•— r ••.. ,• . • • .7 ACRE ` •..•.,�.,, i r AR[A OF fTRttTS `► t ' Mtt AREA ■ 1 -1 ACRI a r 2 174 , �` •' ~'''- 00"A" "gA ■ .1 ACRE ( I w �' • } `- I W N = _ 12.20 Sf. • :•: .. , IZ 2168 — rt �:s ! �� - 1 -•�� -� ' an .. - ---- ---�a 21 W ; - - •' ::::::�.:.:�::�: �r o PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT VACATION 62 ..,:......:.: T - — JUNCTIO :•- .•�••.:••.•.••.•. 2 - . - i ca PROPOSED PONDING AREA (OUTLOT R) . .. 5 / oaac�rw colrrou� i @=K LOCA70H it MIDWEST ..wam mom so am - � Own so land Surveyors & Gv11 Engineers, Jnc. a- • am e• owwo 40+ �•- •r• •. ••• EM ceem MpM • r•rir..•an�u1• 41. ftpM1t. SSNR _ ML N�1M�M Iw �1MMMN y u. �"+�_.._�� • AIM MR No Owl madam. 'e Attachment 5 G. PUBLIC WMINGS - Continued 20 7:.10 P'.M. (7:15 P.M.). Cave's English Street Third Addition a. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposal to develop lots for ten homes South of County Road B and East of English Street. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d., Commissioner Frost presented the Planning Commission report. e. Acting Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Sam Cave, representing Cave and Associates, Ltd. Robert Hensley, of Doherty. Rumble. Butler, representing the applicant Jules Loipersbeck. 2156 English Street Bill Karel, 2180 English Street f. Acting Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. Drainage Easement g. Counci 1 member Koppen i nt educed the fol l owi na Resolution and moved its ado 94.06 -93 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION WHEREAS, Sam Cave, representing Cave and Associates, Ltd, applied for the vacation of the following described easement: The drainage and utility easement on Lot 6, Block 1. of Cave's English Street Second Addition. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1) On August 1, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council vacate this easement. 2) The City Council held a public hearing on August 2 1994, The City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting property: Lot 6, Block 1 of Cave's English Street Second Addition. 8,22.94 7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above described vacation for the following reasons: 1) It is in the public interest. 2) The vacation will allow a more efficient lot design. 3) The developer will dedicate a new drainage area. This vacation is subject to the developer recording this Resolution with the final plat. The City shall not release this Resolution until the City approves the final plat. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes -all Preliminary Plat h. Counc 1 member a) Complete all grading for overall site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements and meet all City requirements. b)* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c) Pay the City for the cost of traffic - control and street identification signs. d) Widen County Road B by 4 feet to provide a walkway between McAfee Circle and the County trail property. The developer shall widen County Road 6 with the new street. The City and County Engineers must approve these plans. The City is requiring this walkway because: (1) it will provide a safe place for the residents of the new plat to walk to the County trail and Gladstone Park. (2) The walkway is to provide safer access to the trail. (3) These requirements follow City policy as stated in the Comprehensive Plan. e)* Provide all easements required by the City Engineer. f) Remove the existing fence and gate from around the vacated part of the pond and install a fence and gate around the new pond in Outlot B. This fence shall match the existing fence' in height and materials. The developer or contractor may salvage the fence and gate materials not used to fence the pond, subject to the — City Engineer's approval. �L 8 -22 -94 1) Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: 2)'* 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) B)* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, fence, erosion control, tree, trail and street plans.. the plans shall meet the following conditions: a) The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control handbook. b) The grading plan shall include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. c) The tree plan shall show: (1) Where the developer will remove, safe or replace l (2) The size an species of trees that the developer will plant as replacement trees. (3) Enlarge. the pond capacity to the maximum practical capacity by changing the side slopes to 3:1. Show the following on the final plat: a) A twenty•foot•wide utility easement between lots 4 and 5 for the proposed storm sewer. b) A drainage and utility easement on the ease side of Lots 5, 6. 7 and 10, Block 1. subject to the City Engineer's approval. This easement shall be for the proposed storm sewer pipes. c) A drainage and utility easement on the north side of Lots 9 and 10, subject to the City Engineers approval. This easement shall be for the proposed sanitary sewer pipe. d) Show drainage and utility easements along all - property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and -rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. Record covenants or deed restrictions with the final plat that do the following: a) Require the builder of the house on Lot 10 to install a driveway turn - around when they build the driveway. b) Prohibit the driveway on Lot 9 from going onto County Road B. Change `Circle" on the plans to "McAfee Circle ". Deed Outlot B to the amity. If they will accept it, deed Outlot A to the property owners to the west. If they wi11 not include Outlot A in the McAfee Circle right -of -way. Obtain a permit from the Watershed Board. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat. the City may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the City issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes •all 8 -22 -94 0 • Final Plat: •� Cave v s English Street Third Addition Attachment 6 2. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff rep y b. Director of Community Development Ol son presented the specifics o f the � report. s before the Council c. M or Bastian asked Jf anyone wished to p regardi this matter. No one appeared. d. Counci Imember Al1enspach moved to approve Caves En lish Street Third l at sub ect to the foll Addition final ' 1. The County recording the deed restrict ions covenants and deeds. • The wordin of thes documents shall be required by the City 9 subject to staff approval. 2. The staff shall not release the p 1 at for recording until the • developer d oes the following: ditions, including ' the reli.minary lat con a. Satisfies all p • P . _ credit or other financial guarantee for the letter of c the ubl improvements. p f the. re uired deeds, deed b. Submits the f nal copies o q restr ti and covenants to the staff for review before_ taking t kin them to the County with the - plat. b Councilmember Rossbach Ayes all .Seconded y 12-19-94 15 • I J 3. Final Settlement - Cave Litigation ' a Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b . City Attorney Kelly presented the specif of the report. c. Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution and moved its ado ti o_nn_, 9.5 - 02 - 26 EASEMENT VACATION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT S WHEREAS, Sam Cave, re resenting Cave & Associates, Limited, has 10 1 ied for a raina a and utility easement vacation and a previousl app g Addit preliminary prat for ten lots for Cave's English Street Third A WHEREAS, the City pp Council a pproved a preliminary plat for Cave's English Street Third Addition on August.22, 1994. t WHEREAS The City- Council approved a drainage and utility easement Y PP vacation on August 22, 1994, which easement vacation was not to be released it the City a pproved the final plat of Cave's English Street Third until pp Addition. WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Cave's English Street Third Addition final plat on December 13, 1994 subject to specified condition. WHEREAS, t he aforementioned final plat of Cave's English Street Third Addition is still subject to condition with which the applicant has not yet complied. WHERE PP q AS the applicant has now requested permission from the City u Council to complete the necessary condition within a specified period of time. WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the public to have the conditions to the Cave's Engl Str third Addition sati sfied with a specified period of time. WHEREAS it is in the best interests of the public to obtain settlement and dismissal of that civil action entitled Ed Cave & Sons, Inc. v. City of Maplewood, Court File No. CS -93 -6321. WHEREAS, the aforementioned civil action is ready for settlement subject ' only to this pending acti of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council take the following action: 1. The ap proval of the Cave's English Street Third Addition final plat on December 13, is ere y rescind so as to reinstate P English Street Third for Cave's En the preliminary plat approval o g Addition dated August 22, 19940 2. The reliminary plat approval for Cave's English .Street Third Addition p • is hereby amended to pro a vide that all outstanding conditions of that preliminary plat approval shall be satisfied on or before August 22, 19980 3. Thee vacation of the drainage and utility easement on Lot 6, 61 1 of Cave's English Street Second Addition shall not be released until such time as the City approves the final plat of Cave's English Street Third Addition. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 11 FW- 3000W Act by Coun to En.d o rs a d.,a„.. MEMORANDUM Mod.ified�, IRNeete Dat e TO: City Manager, Mike McGuire FROM: Community Development Director, Melinda Coleman SUBJECT: Rental Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 1995 Carefree Cottages of Maplewood III Project DATE: March 15, 1996 INTRODUCTION In March of 1995 the city issued $8,240,000 in Renta Housing Revenue Bonds for the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood. From this bond issue, $34.0,000 remains outstanding. In November of 1995, the city issued $7,900,000 Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds for the Carefree Cottages which refunded the Original bonds. The remaining $340,000, from the original bonds, will either be . redeemed or refunded later this year. The enclosed resolution for city council approval will allow the holder of the bonds to refinance at a variable rate equal to 60% of the prime rate. have also enclosed a copy of the First Supplemental Indenture of Trust for your reference. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on page 2. This resolution approves a First Supplemental Indenture of Trust with Norwest Bank Minnesota National Association for the outstanding $340,000. p :com dvptlbonds.thr Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. First Supplemental Indenture of Trust Attachment I i " EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA HELD: 1996 Pursuant to.due call and-notice thereof, a me of the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Ramse Count Minnesota was dul called and held at Cit Hall in said Cit on the da of 1996 at o'clock _.m. The followin members were present.- and the followin were absent: Member introduced the followin resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRUST WITH NORWE,ST BANK M NATIONAL ASSOCIATION BE IT RESOLVED b the Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "Cit that the Cit hereb approves a First Supplem Indenture of Trust to be entered into with Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association in connection with the outstandin $340,000 Rental Housin Revenue Bonds Series 1995 (Carefree Cotta of Maplewood III Project) and authorizes the Ma and Cit Clerk to execute the First Supplemental indenture of Trust on behalf of the Cit The motion for t he adoption of the fore resolution was seconded b member and upon vote bein taken thereon, the followin voted in favor thereof; and the followin voted a the same. Whereupon said resolution was declared dul passed a adopted. 314576.1 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached. and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City, duly called and held on the date herein indicated, insofar as such minutes related to approving a First Supplemental Indenture of Trust with Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association. WITNESS my hand this day of , 1996. City Clerk 3 314576.1 Attachment 2 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRUST This First Supplemental Indenture of Trust dated as of the 1st day of April, 199.6 , by and between the City of Maplewood ( the "City ") and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association (the "'Trustee"): WHEREAS, the Issuer and the Trustee have heretofore entered into that certain Indenture of Trust dated as of March 1, 1995 (the "Indenture" , in connection with the issuance of the City's $8,240,000 Rental Housing Revenue Bonds Series 1995. (Carefree Cottages of Maplewood III Project) (the "Bonds*"), of which $340,000 still remains outstanding (the "Outstanding Bonds "). WHEREAS, Section 2 - 2 (a) of the Indenture provides that the Bonds bear interest at the Variable Rate equal to 630 of the Prime Rate (as defined in the Indenture) . WHEREAS, the holder of the Outstanding Bonds has agreed to amend the Indenture to provide that, from and after April 1, 1996, the Outstanding Bonds bear interest at a Variable Rate equal to 600 of the Prime Rate. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Issuer and the Trustee as follows: 1. Section 2 -2 (a) of the Indenture is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section .2-2 (a) . Variable Rate From and after the date of issuance of the Bonds through and including March 31, 1996, the Bonds shall bear interest at the Variable Rate, which shall be a rate equal to sixty -three percent (630) of the Prime Rate. From and after April 1, 1996, up to the Conversion Date, the Outstanding Bonds shall bear interest at the Variable Rate, which shall be a rate equal to sixty percent (600) of the Prime Rate. The interest rate on the Outstanding Bonds shall change effective as of the date of any change in the Prime Rate." 2. Except as herein amended, all other terms and provisions of the Indenture shall remain in full and force and effect. 314574.1 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Issuer and the Trustee have caused this First Supplemental Indenture of Trust to be executed b their dul authorized officers. CITY OF MAPLtWOOD B Its Ma B Its Clerk Si pa to First Supplemental Indenture of Trust dated as of April 1, 1996, b y and between the Cit of Maplewood and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association. 314574.1 NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION .B Its B its Si pa to First Supplemental Indentur of Trust dated as of April 1, 1996, b and between the Cit of Maplewood and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association. 314574.1 CONSENT OF BONDHOLDER TO FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRUST the undersigned, do . h certi that I am the of the re holder of the Cit of Maplewood's $340,000 Rental Hou in Rev Bonds., Series 1995 (Carefree Cotta of Maplewood II Project) . I have reviewed the First Supplemental Indenture of Trust dated as of April 1, 1996, between the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota, and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association. In accordance with the re of Section 12 of the Indenture, I hereb consent to the First Supplemental Indenture of Trust dated April 1, 1996. I also consent, in accordance with Section 2-12(h) of the Indenture, to the extension of the Conversion Date (as defined in the Indenture) to October 1, 1996. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate on this da of 1996. B Its 314574.1 CERTIFICATE OF TRUSTEE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD $340,000 RENTAL HOUSING REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1995 (CAREFREE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD III PROJECT) I, the unders igned, the of Norwe s t Bank Minnesota, National Association, do hereby certify that is . the registered holder of 100% in principal amount of the above referenced bonds Dated this day of 1996. NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By Its 'Poo 314574.1 MEMO UM To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manage From: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of P Subj : Best Buy and Circuit City Donatit Date: March 15, 1996 F-00- 4 Action b C� ouno� J Endorsed: .- .- ..... - . Mod.i,f�.ed lie j e cted„_...., Date The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Department received a donation of a Stereo/Public Address System for the Maplewood Puppet Wagon. The total value of the equipment that we received was $300. Specific items that were donated included a tape -to -tape deck, microphone system and a receiver. Thank -you letters have been forwarded to both Circuit City and Best Buy on behalf of the City. The City Council should formally accept the donations on behalf of the City. r i ActlOn b a AGENDA REPORT Endorse M®difi� �e,i eete To. City Manager Michael McGuire Date___�� From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. Coll ins F4(n Subject: Revision of Part -Time Clerk Typist Position Date. March 19, 1996 Introduction I am requesting permission to convert the present single part -time Clerk Typist position to two part -time Clerk Typist positions as soon as possible* yP p Background A study of the use of overtime by the clerical staff has revealed the following: 1. Our calls for service have increased approximately 20% per year for the past three years, resulting in an annual increase in data entry requirements of about 10% per year over the same period. 2. The clerical staff has not been increased in seven years. 3. During this time, the workload on the clerical staff has been increased due to additional clerical duties. 4. The data entry backlog has been increasing at a rate just slightly less than 20 entry hours per week (as measured by use of overtime). 5. Because of seniority in the unit, the full -time Clerks have attained high levels of annual vacation. They have also been experiencing a s i g n i f i c a n t use of sick leave due to surgeries and illnesses. Based on the above findings, the expansion of the single part - time position to two part -time positions is financially and operationally the correct choice for the following reasons: 1. By introducing an additional Clerk Typist for 20 hours .per week, we will be able to avoid the recurring backlog that adversely affects the availability and accuracy of our records. 2. By making this a job- share position, we will obtain two trained employees for the price of one, positioning. us for better coverage during clerical vacancies and for timely. expansion as the clerical workload continues to increase. 3. T h i s extra position w i l l be financed by-using overtime funds that are currently budgeted for Recommendation It is recommended that this request be approved by the City Council. Action Required Submit to the City Council for review and approval. KVC:js F--- 9 Action by coun AGENDA REPORT Endorsed Modified„ To: City Manager Michael McGuire ]Reiected... From: Fire Chief Joel A. Hewitt Dat e_____ Subject: Transfer From Contingency Fund For Fire Department Consolidation' Seminar Date: March 15, 1996 Introduction On Tuesday, March 19, 1996, Chief Jeff Johnson from Tualatin Valley Fire Department, located near Portland, Oregon, will be conducting a consolidation seminar for 40 members of Maplewood' s fire departments. The Tualatin Valley Fire Department was a result of a consolidation process that combined several fire districts to create one of the largest volunteer fire ) (with g firefi hters over 500 de artments in the country. Chief Johnson is the p successor of Chief Jack Snook, who was Chief during the consolidation process. Both Chiefs now work together consulting on processes such as ours and have become nationally recognized for their work and seminar presentations on this subject matter. Chief Johnson will be presenting a customized seminar to assist the fire departments and City staff in our consolidation process. The costs for this seminar are obviously less expensive by bringing Chief Johnson here rather than having us travel to attend a seminar out of state. We also have the benefit of giving a large number of officers the ability to attend. Costs for the seminar are estimated as follows: Facilitator's fee Air fare Lodging & Miscellaneous Subtotal for Facilitator $ 750.00 (confirmed) 350.00 (estimated) 340.00 (estimated) $1,440.00 Forty dinners Refreshments Subtotal GRAND TOTAL Recommendation $ 213.79 (confirmed) 60.00 (estimated) $ 273.79 $1,713.79 It is recommended that the City Council authorize a budget transfer of $1,800 from the Contingency Account (101 - 119 - 000 -4910) to the new Fire Fighting Travel & Training Account (101 - 404 - 000 -4390) to cover these costs. JAH : j s AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Coubc-161.0- To: City Manager Endorse ...r....�.�... Y Modi fie FROM: Assistant City Engineer ]Re jecte g inee r �� D SUBJECT: Project 89 -21 White Bear Avenue Improvements --- ' J Public Hearing (7.30) DATE: March 18, 1996 Staff is prepared to present the ro'ect details at the ublic he p 1 p aring at the March 25, 1996 city counciI meeting. The public hearing s being held for information g 9 a1 purposes,....... it is not a legal requirement due to the ro'ect financin p 1 An information meeting was scheduled for Wednesda _ g y, March 20, 1996., from 5 p. m. to 7 p.m. in the council chambers. It is hoped that most if not all public p , p is questions and concerns will have been addressed there. RAM jC ;A et i. on by C oune i l d MEMORANDUM Endo rsed Modif i e d�.....�..� TO: City Manager Rejecte FROM: To Ekstrand, Associate Planner Dat SUBJECT: Sign Variances — Countryside Volkswagen /Saab LOCATION: 1180 Highway 36 East DATE: February 21, 1996 INTRODUCTION Jo Schmelz, of Countryside Volkswagen /Saab, has submitted sign plans for his car dealership on Highway 36. His proposal exceeds sign code limitations. Therefore, Mr. Schmelz is asking for the following variances: 1. Two more freestandina signs than the code allows. Code allows one; Mr. Schmelz proposes three — (1) "Saab" (2) "Used Cars" and (3) "VW." Refer to the plans (separate attachments). 2. A 3.5 -foot height variance for the _Saa, b freestanding sign. Code allows a maximum height of 25 feet; the proposed Saab sign would be 28.5 feet tall. (The applicant's letter on page 8 begins by also requesting a variance to have a total of eight signs and one ten - square -foot directional sign. The code allows all of these. This variance, therefore, is not needed. Refer to the ordinance requirements on page 3 for a description of what the code allows.) Refer to the maps on pages 5-7 and the letter on pages 8 -12. Staff has issued sign permits already for some of these signs. The applicant is installing those signs that the code allows. The 28.5- foot -tall freestanding sign and the two additional pylon signs cannot be installed without variances. DISCUSSION Variance #1 — Two Additional Freestanding Signs There is no justification to approve this request. State law provides that the city council may approve a variance only if "strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property." There are no such circumstances. This variance request is simply based on a desi for additional freestanding signs by the auto suppliers and Mr. Schmelz. The applicant's letter on page 10 states this desire. The applicant also states that allowing three freestanding signs would be in keeping with the spirit and .intent of the ordinance because of the size and configuration of the site. In other words, he feels that the site is large enough to warrant three freestanding signs. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to limit freestanding signs to one sign for each street frontage in order to avoid clutter. Allowing the three freestanding signs would create clutter which is contrary to the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Staff does not agree that the additional freestanding signs should be allowed because of the size of the site. The sign g ordinance is very generous by allowing a total of eight identification signs for this property. Y Variance #2 — Freestanding Sign Height Variance (Saab Pylon Sign) If the city council denies the first variance, this second request is a moot point. There is no justification for this request. The fact that this sign would be at a lower elevation than the other proposed freestanding signs does not make it harder to see. All points of the site are clearly visible from the highway and frontage road. Three and one half feet of additional height would not make the sign more visible. Another factor is that Highway 36 also drops in grade elevation along with the applicant's site. Each proposed sign location would be viewed from basically the same vantage point when driving by. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Denial of the variance request for two additional freestanding signs at Countryside VW /Saab. Denial is based on the following reasons: 1. The applicant's reason for this request is because of the auto manufacturer's desire to have their . own individual freestanding signs as well as the applicant's desire to have a separate "used car' freestanding sign. Therefore, strict enforcement of the ordinance would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. 2.. This request wound not meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance because it would lead to sign- clutter and set a precedent for additional freestanding signs on other properties. B. Denial of the 3.5 -foot sign height variance for the proposed Saab freestanding sign at Countryside VW /Saab. Denial is based on the following reasons: 1 Strict enforcement of the ordinance would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. The proposed sign would be as visible at its allowed height of 25 feet than at the proposed 28.5 feet. The topography of this site and the adjacent properties would not have any hindering affect on the sign's visibility. 2. This request would not meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The ordinance has set height limitations which can be met and provide adequate height for viewing purposes. 2 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 4.45 acres Existing land use: Countryside VW /Saab SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Frontage Road and Highway 36 South: houses and apartments on Duluth Street, Lark Avenue and Atlantic Street West: Menards East: Embers Restaurant PAST ACTION January 9, 1995: The city council approved the following for Countryside VW /Saab: 1 A street right -of -way vacation for part of the frontage road boulevard to give excess right -of -way back to the applicant. 2. A conditional use permit (CUP). The CUP was needed to add onto the maintenance garage. PLANNING Land use plan designation: M -1 (Light Manufacturing) Zoning: M -1 Ordinance Requirements Section 36- 342(a) allows a business in a M -1 district to have five signs if the surface area of their largest building facade exceeds 3,000 square feet. This section permits an additional sign for each clearly differentiated department or tenant. (With this criteria, the applicant can have a total of eight signs; five to start with plus one for the service garage, one for the body shop and one for the Saab building.) Section 36- 342(b) allows only one freestanding sign for each street frontage the site has. Corner lots, or double frontage lots could have two freestanding signs - One along each street. Section 36- 341(3) states that the maximum height of a freestanding sign shall be 25 feet. K Criteria for Variance Approval: State law requires that the city council make the following findings to .approve a variance: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the. spirit and intent of the ordinance. Undue hardship , as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted,, will not alter the essential character of the -locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. psec9 \vwsigns2.txt 1 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Applicant's Written Justification date- stamped February 5, 1996 5. Plans date - stamped February 5, 1996 (separate attachments) 4 Attachment 1 KOMLMAN AVE. ROAD ' J COU�tr�r c ro PALM CO NNOR C AVE • Cr AM CT. DEMOVO • W BROOKS C'T• • G ERVIV S AVE. PKWY • o0 p . La r • � Illiq 0 6 a 00 0. ` :: V COPE T O A N � soc vwT ! 1 r GERV^!5 C RAN OVIEW AVE. VIKING OR. SHERREN AVE. / VIKING R. K�pK� .� �� AVE. - - 4J O 1 Lake O N � �• b UURIE RD. v � � W � LAURIE CT. � �\i o l£VWU R0. v o S URST X 2S ►� � JUNCT?ON AYE � � Z Y 8UR10E Cf. � = 8 rn BURKE AV � o� CL AVE. � BURKE AVE. o HAM BERS ST fLDRIOGE � AV LA. G EIDR IDLE AVE. � BELMONT RSE C'i AvE. BEWOt�fT AVE. ►� SKILN AV. � � fR GOL SKILL LAM SKILL � � AV E SKILL W1lJ AVE. KENw ppp K � �� W u J � AN qv. CD CD i Qom' �eosr �+ :LLWOOD AVE. G �y FE. ►�1TON AVE z 0 q W o O � � � � � U 1�ER AV � v Q .39 Y � 3 � Go � � FRtSB�E AVE °� �� O � p t; RIP LEY U z A / ' Y o� �✓ � G W�k�fbt � o o � } <p� Loki �� 1 1 \ \ SO Y t; � ti SO HU► AVE CD � y LOCATION MAP 5 4 N Attachment 2 1145 � � ' �' ` i.3° °{ � , 94a� � • �,4� 1167 (� � 20 1255 � Q 1195 � � 1211 % I I � ft A ee e s • "-*& A c j% 11 C40 t HIGHWAY 36 �s -- , �- 8zS .� D I _ .......� .' �. I 7 � � .. .b i6 q ONTAGE ROAD. i `_. --t, _ 1:6., &a( no i \ e r .... . f.. C�ff �e k;w .i I 1255 .. �. 'N b4dkA � + P 2303 M'31 Y1Iil 1200 -- --- ... ...... ...... . ..... ....... ' f: :f ' 0 .. ......... ... f EMBERS 4 1 s J ♦� ... :�: 1248 9. 15 vw --SAAB i4 �u •Z � 7 12 0 1233 f. 40 - �, 4 .. _ a ■ as in Ito il • �I� w OG 1 M E N A R D S �.,�, ► ` ,�- f T- Y% - I I 2275 S fi; I ,{ l i � �, tb I1 �a 9 I zo 2 E , 2266 2 ,, _ ( , Iftya sle X. so A., -0 4 q UJI = .� �,L m �o� o o {{ �E C-4 IN �-I N '� ,� N , z ','1'.�► �t1 �� i % h (3) 2 2 5 5 L1J N r . !- I r r i C4 N �"' OP v J6& cc 4BALSIN10 a 0M 10 -1 LARK .71 ac 35 1. 7 ac � I. O 1424 � .t • "o ''. • i a ,.� - � � i s eo s► N sic x 'I 2233 ' N . , N O W �t I� ,��► K) Z ,� qqt J O10 , o •1 O 7O }'�' t I , t (� �, t � Zb I Z� ...J �? I �11� Z+ I Too �+ 42.E - • t.,t +) '� J .a .. so K Q t J _ -•-T is '�Xssssl slll_ - -- r- cf) . r- .. 2 2 2 3 ' �. ; T �, 1115 4 M'r 1143 _ (6) . ; �oo� I � �I'd e`�'i l ��' s �,�' 3 I��' +. ,� �•,� „ - t ♦- r T— . a ' � I r- � I Tm `% �)' A A. 9i i2 ��2 t 4 , }0 3 � r � .�' 4 ^ .i0 40 �p ao 4. 40 1 % . Ogg Z(. .j tAX, 1 L lac. 4 b at 4 1115 I I I I 20 ..+ . i �tl I ` I ►T Z t9 i 122 '3 A �iv Z(. 21 ; zs 3d 16 ? � 1b 1 X19 ( 4 .�. - X20 � 0+ L �_ I _ -V I k r +i" - PA tp a a 1 PROPERTY LINE I ZONING MAP L 4 N Attachment 3 O Z Z T rd O ter o X C > .. • / p 0 i Z3 zi Co M Z MM r o m � s �'" f j g . v � � v • � s � ZONED M_1_ +, n+ �" ZO NED R3 5 w �, •-- cop J Z . O v � c ZONED Mt ........... _._. m �`— ZONED R1 E M a; Z .0 s� 4 4 N Attachment 4 ATTACHMENT TO SIGNAGE VARIANCE APPLICATION INTRODUCTION • Applicant wishes to receive a signage variances consisting of the following: 1. approval of eight individual signs with square footage as designed (section 36- 342a). 2. approval of three freestanding signs with square footage as designed (section 36- 342b). 3. approval of one freestanding sign 13.5 taIler than allowed by code (section 36- 341.3). STATE LAVA REQUIREMENTS FOR FINDINGS BY CITY TO GRANT VARIANCE • Applicant feels that all variances requested are the result of undue hardships caused by circumstances unique to his property and business 1. The topography, elevation and shape of the property in relation to surrounding properties and roadways, causes visibility limitations 2. Applicant's property contains several buildings and Outdoor activity areas which require identification 3. Applicant sells multiple major brand name products and services which require . individual identification Applicant feels that by granting the requested variances,. the City would remain in keeping with the spirit and intent of the signage ordinances. For a property of this size and configuration, the signage requested is neither excessive nor a hazard 10 public health and safety. 1. All proposed signage is designed, manufactured and installed using top quality materials, carefully composed, proportioned and colored for integration with all architectural elements on the site 2. Proposed signage does not obscure roadway visibility nor is the top of any sign higher than signage on adjacent properties DOCUMENTATION OF PROPOSED SIGNAGE • Please refer to the attached drawing for a visual description of all requested signage and locations on property and buildings; refer to attached spreadsheet for square footage calculations. PREPARATION OF APPLICATION • This variance application has been prepared by the Applicant and Charles Levin of Charles Levin Architects ATTACHMENT TO SIGNAGE VARIANCE APPLICATION COUNTRYSIDE VW/SAAB PAGE 1 of 4 1. APPLICANT REQUESTS _PERMISSION TO ERECT 8 INDIVIDUAL SIGNS AND 1 DIRECTIONAL SIGN 8ACKGROUND Applicant's family has conducted business for decades using the names `SCHMELZ' and `COUNTRYSIDE'. The applicant relies upon the public's familiarity and trust for these names to attract business. Although the necessary signage is lengthy, applicant feels that to commu nicate effectively with potential customers, he must publicize his family /business .names where appropriate as well as the products and services he sells: 1. Volkswagen Building a. New Volkswagen vehicles b. Dealership service center 2. Saab Building a. New Saab vehicles 3. Body Shop Building 4. Used Car Sales Lot DESIRED SITUATION Applicant wishes erect 8 .individual signs as shown on the attached drawings (please note that two of the signs are on the same fascia, separated by an entry canopy). Additionally, :Applicant requests the square footage of the signage as designed (see spreadsheet). HARDSHIP CONDITIONS The Zoning Code calculates the maximum number of signs based on the largest building face on the property; applicant's property contains 3 buildings, two of which have street frontage. -(The Building Code applies an imaginary property line midway between the buildings for analysis of property line related construction issues (UBC 503.3); it does not appear that - the Zoning Code makes such a distinction). • If only the single largest building face is considered, 5 signs would be allowed: Buildina N ame Largest face A11 wable No. of .signs (by 36 -342a) VW Building .......... 3,146 sf (east) ........................... 5 • if only the buildings with street frontage were treated separately, a total of 8 signs would be allowed: Bu ildina ,_Name La face Allo. wable No of ,sig,na,_(by 36 342al VW Building .......... 3 9 146 sf ( east ) ........... ..............:.5 SAAB Building ....... 1,200 sf ( east ) ........................... 3 • 9 all three buildings were treated separately, a total of 12 signs would be allowed: il, ina Name Largest face Alto .� ab,le N , of sign. , (by 38 -342a) VW Building .......... 3 sf ( east ) ...........................5 SAAB Building ....... 1,200 sf (east) ........................... 3 Body Shop .............1,764 sf (east) .............. **s.e*e.ea.s*4 9 ATTACHMENT TO SIGNAGE VARIANCE APPLICATION COUNTRYSIDE VW/SAAB PAGE 2 of 4 29 OF THE 8 INDIVIDUAL SIGNS REQUESTED, APPLICANT REQUESTS PERMISSION FOR 3 OF THESE TO BE FREESTANDING BACKGROUND For years, Applicant has had two freestanding signs, one which advertises brand names and one for Used Cars. DESIRED SITUATION Due, to the demands of his product suppliers, Applicant wishes to separate the VOLKSWAGEN and SAAB identities, each on their own freestanding sign, to be consistent with the separation of each brand in its own building. Applicant also feels it necessary to identify the Used Car portion of his business on its own freestanding sign, rather .than placing the words .`USED CARS' on both brand signs. Thus, three freestanding signs are requested. Applicant emphasizes that although additional freestanding signs are requested, the distance between the signs is within the minimum amount allowed by Zoning Code (100.feet). HARDSHIP CONDITIONS The size requirement limitation for an individual freestanding sign imposed by the Zoning Code (200 square feet by 36- 341.2) is inadequate for applicant's use due to: the amount and individuality of information which needs to be communicated the. necessary size of the information for readability the height necessary for visibility from highway 36 the standard design of SAAB and VW freestanding signage • Applicants frontage is 356 lineal feet, all on one street; if property were on a corner with significantly less street frontage, a minimum of two freestanding signs would be allowed without variance from the zoning Code 10 ATTACHMENT TO SIGNAGE VARIANCE APPLICATION COUNTRYSIDE VW /SAAB PAGE 3 of 4 3. APPLICANT REQUESTS PERMISSION TO ERECT .A FREESTANDING SIGN 13.5% TALLER THAN ALLOWED AT THE PROPERTY LIN E DESIRED SITUATION Applicant wishes to create an orderly appearance for all freestanding signage by making the _heights consistent. Since Applicant's site slopes down significancy at the northwest comer, a height variance is necessary to bring the bop of the sign at the northwest comer level with the other proposed freestanding signs (see drawing A18.1). (Note: Reviewers of this application are encouraged to personally view the site from Highway 36 to see how the Applicant has already made this .height adjustment with new site fighting) HARDSHIP CONDITIONS Applicant desires to erect the northwest . corner freestanding sign at 28.5 feet tall, in lieu of 25 feet allowed by code (at the property line). • code allows signs up to 50 feet tall, but requires that the sign be moved back 3 feet for each foot over 25 feet; if applicants freestanding sign, were to be moved back enough to achieve this height within the code requirements, it would interfere with vehicle movement on the property and be under major overhead power lines crossing the site. Applicant has explored the cost of relocating the electrical lines underground, but has found the cost to be prohibitive and the result to be unacceptable since the adjacent pole lines crossing Highway 36 cannot be removed (according to NSP). Applicants property elevation is the lowest in the area, thus visibility is limited: • to the west, the elevation of the Highway 36 bridge deck (crossing over Highway 61) is 6 feet higher than any point on applicant's property according to Maplewood Aerial photograph of site (dated 3/81) • to the east, the elevation of the Embers Restaurant is 8 feet higher than the highest point on applicants property according to Maplewood Aerial photograph of site (dated 3/81) • the elevation of this particular comer of the property is several feet lower than the average elevation of the site (see registered survey) 11 ATTACHMENT TO SIGNAGE VARIANCE APPLICATION COUNTRYSIDE VW/SAAB PAGE 4 of 4 w � SUMMARY OF PROPOSED S - COUNTRYSIDE VW /SAAB SIGNAGE CONTROLLED BY ZONING CODE N SIGN NUMBER SIGN LOCATION WIDTH (FEET) HEIGHT (FEET) 'DOTAL COPY AREA (SQ. FT.) GENERAL NOTES 1 VOLKSWAGEN FREESTANDNG SIGN 7.00 23.35 163.48 Only one face is counted in area calculations; area of ex sed looting is included 2 USED CAR FREESTANDING SIGN 7.00 24.38 170..63 3 SAAB FREESTANDING SIGN 7.21 28.38 2Q4.54 4 VW BUILDING FASCIA 48.79 3.33. 162.48 5 SAAB BUILDING FASCIA- EAST 23.25- 2.83 65.87 6 SAAB BUILDING FASCIA- WEST 21.4$ 2.40 51.46 7 BODY SHOP WEST WALL 88.00 5.00 440.00 8 SCREEN WALL 22.00 Varies 128.26 TOTAL SIG NAG E AREA 1,3 86.71 Allo signage area by Zoning Code = length of property line x 3 squa feet 355.7 x 3 = 1,067.1 square feet, thus 130% of allowable area is requested. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE NOT INCLUDE IN ABOVE TOTALS Twn rlirprtinnal SinnS ipso than 10 snimm fppt in araa arp ailnwaci SIGN SIGN LOCATION WIDTH HEIGHT TOTAL AREA NUMBER I FEET 1 FEET SQ. FT. VW BUILDING FASCIA: SIGN A READS "SERVICE ENTRANCE" 10.00 1.00 10-00 ATTACHMENT TO SIGNAGE VARIANCE APPLICATION MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 27, 1996 CALL TO ORDER rperson Erickson called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. il. ROLL RC t�L Marvin Erickso Present Marie Robinson Absent Ananth Vidyashankar Present - Gordon Berggren sent Tim Johnson Pr t 111. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. February 13, 1996 Boardmember Berggren moved a roval of the amended minutes of February 13, 1996 changing Item VI. D. to read " J nson" instead of "Young." Boardmember Vidyas ar seconded. Aye —all IV, APPROVAL OF AGE A - Boardmember Vi ashankar moved approval of the agenda as submitted. BoardmemOr Johnson seconded. Ayes —all V. UNFWSHED BUSINESS was no unfinished business. VI. DESIGN REVIEW A. Sign Variance Request -- Countryside VW /Saab, 1180 Highway 36 John Schmelz, the owner, and Chuck Levine, the architect, were present representing Countryside VW /Saab. Mr. Schmelz said he has two manufacturers who have instituted signage on a national basis that he is required to follow. He said they were asking for the 3-1/2 foot variance to make all of the three proposed signs level across the top. The signs cannot be moved further back because of NSP power l ines. Mr. Levine said the dealership originally proposed a single sign but this was rejected by Saab and Volkswagen. He stated that, even though Mr. Schmelz handles two brands, he actually sells three products -used cars being the third product. Mr. Levine also said. there were inconsistencies in how the zoning and building codes evaluate prope He said the building code considers each individual building separately when dealing with fire - rating, etc. while the zoning code considers the dealership as one property. in this case, if a lot line was . Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes ' of 02 -27 -96 imagined between the buildings and if there were two separate owners for the buildings at Countryside VW /Saab, two pylon signs would be permitted. Mr. Levine said the VW and Saab signs are premanufactured and come in a certain size. The comer where the signs are is low to facilitate storm drainage. He said the Volkswagen sign was elevated on a 2 -foot concrete base to prevent it from being hit by cars in the lot. The other signs were positioned so that the tops were all the same as the Volkswagen sign. Mr. Levine said the Volkswagen and used car signs are actually below their allowable height limits, and the Saab sign is taller than allowable for its position. Mr. Schmelz pointed out that the two buildings on the property have different addresses. Secretary Ekstrand said the code does recognize that --it allows a total of eight identification signs because they are separate entities. Mr. Ekstrand complimented Countryside Volkswagen /Saab on their attractive sign design, but said he could find no reason under the state statute and city ordinance to recommend approval of a variance. He added that a manufacturer's desire to have individual signage was not adequate basis --attractive designs can be made incorporating all three messages. Mr. Schmelz and Mr. Levine again emphasized that there are two distinctly separate structures with separate identities. One is strictly Volkswagen and the other Saab. Boardmember Erickson said he thought this was a good argument for presentation to the city council, but the board must decide if this request meets the criteria of the ordinance for a variance. He felt it did not meet this criteria. Mr. Levine also mentioned that the height limitation is based on the ground elevation at the location where the sign is placed. He indicated that there is a 6 -foot change in elevation within 10 feet which allows the top of the Ember's sign to be at least 6 -8 feet above the top of this sign which would be only 100 feet from it. Boardmember Vidyashankar observed that there were other new car dealerships along Highway 61 that also have used cars and don't advertise them separately on a pylon sign. He also said there were two more products —parts and service -that aren't indicated on the pylon sign. Mr. Schmelz said that some of the dealers do have separate used -car pylon signs.. .Boardmember Berggren said he has noticed that variances are being granted in matters that involve nationally- advertised programs. He said he was in favor of this variance. Boardmember Johnson agreed that it was a great- looking sign but indicated he would have difficulty voting for the variance. Boardmember Vidyashankar also thought two entrances /exits to the property and three signs would cause some confusion. Mr. Schmelz thought it would make it easier for potential customers. Mr. Schmelz and Mr. Levine gave some details on the requirements Saab has for their signs. Boardmember Berggren asked about the variance for the Birch Run Station sign. Secretary Ekstrand said both staff and the community design review board recommended denial of this variance. The city council was split in their consideration and then allowed the variance. Community Design Review Board -3- Minutes of 02 -27-96 Mr. Levine took issue with the comment in the report about "sign clutter." He said they have gone to great extremes to unify the entire site. and that quantity in signs does not necessarily equal clutter. He thought signage could not be viewed independently of the entire effort being made on the site. He asked to have this comment. stricken from the report. Boardmember Vidyashankar moved the Community. Design Review Board recommend: A. Denial of the variance request for two additional freestanding signs at Countryside VW /Saab. Denial is based on the following reasons: 1. The applicant's reason for this request is because of the auto manufacturer's desire to have their own individual freestanding signs as well as the applicant's desire to have a separate "used car" freestanding sign. Therefore, strict enforcement of the ordinance would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. 2. This request would not meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance because it would lead to sign - clutter and set a precedent for additional freestanding signs on other properties. B. Denial of the 3.5 -foot sign height variance for the proposed Saab freestanding sign at Countyside VW /Saab. Denial is based on the following reasons: 1. Strict enforcement of the ordinance would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. The proposed sign would be as visible at its allowed height of 25 feet than at the proposed 28.5 feet. The topography of this site and the adjacent properties would not have any hindering affect on the sign's visibility. 2. This request would not meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The ordinance has set height limitations which can be met and provide adequate height for viewing purposes. Boardmember Johnson seconded. There was considerable discussion among the board on this issue. The board is denying this request based on the code. The board., however, is sympathetic to this request based on the attractive sign proposal and the applicant's statements to the board about the requirements of Saab and Volkswagen for individual pylon signs. Ayes — Erickson, Johnson, Vidyashankar Nays — Berggren 1TOR PRESENTATIONS r presentations. C7..w 3 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: James Ericson -- Planning Intem SUBJECT: CUP Revision and Building Design Approval LOCATION: 2280 Maplewood Drive DATE: March 5, 1996 INTRODUCTION Project .Description Action by Council Endorsed.,.„ MOdif i ed. JRejeoted..... now Date Mr. Greg Stachowiak, representing Echo Lake Greenhouse of Turtle Lake, Wisconsin, is proposing to operate a temporary greenhouse for three months each year starting around April 1. He is proposing to build the greenhouse in the vacant parking lot directly west of Menard's outdoor storage yard. Refer to the maps on pages 9-12 and the letter on page 13. The proposed greenhouse would be 48 feet by 21 feet; it would stand 11 feet high. It would have galvanized steel tubing with a white polyethylene covering (see page 14). The proposed hours of operation would coincide with those of Menard's. (These are 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Saturdays, and 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Sundays.) Greg Stachowiak anticipates displaying some stock outside the structure, but said that they would put all items inside the greenhouse at night. Depending upon the success of the operation, Mr. Stachowiak would like the greenhouse to become an annual business. Requests Mr. Stachowiak is requesting approval of the following: 1. Revision of the conditional use .permit (CUP) for Menard's. Code requires a CUP revision because the proposed greenhouse is an enlargement of the original Menard's CUP. Code also requires a CUP for a building (the proposed greenhouse) that would be within 350 feet of a residential district. 2. Site and building design plans. DISCUSSION CUP Revision The city council should approve this request. Staff has not observed any problems with temporary greenhouses in other parking lots around town. These businesses are seasonal and only last for approximately three months each spring and early summer. If problems would occur, the city code allows the council to review a CUP for amendment or termination for noncompliance. Site .and Building Design Considerations . The greenhouse design would be acceptable. The steel -tube framing with polyethylene covering is typical of such greenhouses in other parking Lots in Maplewood. The city should not allow the applicant to use any air- moving devices that would cause nuisance -noise to nearby homeowners. The applicant said that the parking lot in the area of the proposed greenhouse is in good condition. Maplewood should require patching if it is not. The applicant also must stripe the parking lot to meet the parking requirements. Neighbors' Concerns I. How many years would this approval be for? The applicant may wish to operate this greenhouse each year if the site is a successful location. 2. Does this permit allow the operation of this business or will it allow the operation of . other businesses? This CUP, as revised, would only permit the continuance of Menard's and the proposed greenhouse. 38 What will the greenhouse hours be? The applicant proposes to operate the greenhouse, at the most, along with Menard's regular store hours. They likely, however, would have shorter hours according to the applicant. Mr. Stachowiak guesses that their hours would probably be from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. 4.. Would the structure be temporary or permanent? What are materials of construction? Would there be any items stored outside of the greenhouse? Refer to the project description above. 5. Menard's already has trouble maintaining the easement on their south border and they .keep piling merchandise higher than the fence. Staff has not found any evidence of an easement south of the Menard property line. The original conditions did not speak.of any easement or maintenance requirement. Menard's periodically stacks building materials higher than the top of the .fence. When we inform the store manager of a complaint, they are quick to correct the problem. Enforcement has always been difficult because of the confusing and conflicting conditions of the CUP. The proposed revisions in the recommendation should clarify and consolidate the screening- fence requirements. They do not lessen any city requirement. S. There is already too much traffic in this area and at the corner of Maplewood Drive and County Road B. Are there plans to improve the intersection for better traffic flow? This greenhouse use would draw people to the site thus increasing traffic. It is difficult to say, though, how many of those would already be at the site to shop at Menard's. This is a 2 small, short -term business, however, compared to a Large, permanent one that a site of this size could hold. Staff, therefore, does not foresee any appreciable worsening of traffic congestion. The city improved the intersection of County Road B and Maplewood Drive last summer as part of the frontage road improvements. There are no plans to do any further work at this intersection. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approve the resolution on pages 15-17. This resolution revises the conditional use permit for Menard's outdoor storage yard with the following changes (I have crossed out the deletions and underlined the additions): 1. Adherence to the site plan dated March 15, 1988, and the greenhouse plan dated January, 8. 19 unless a change is approved by the city's community design review board. The director of communiN development may approve minor changes, .1 . r — 4 • • r • — • • .. — . • FTW I . — — — • e • — • • .. . r • • • — • r T-11rib I • Compl_ianc with the following screening-fence requirements: a. The property o, wnershall continue to h ave, and keep in a maintained condition, wooden s cree, nino- fences. as follows: An eight- foot -tall fence runn, no north -south on the west side of 1071 County Road B. This section of fence shall have "no parking" signs displayed. An eight- foot -tall fence running east -west from ; the northwest corner of 1071 County Road B to the northwest comer of 1101 County Road B. A 14-foot-tall fence behind 1101. and 1115 County _Road .B: also along the west lot line of 1115 County Road _B where it abuts. Menard's. A 14- foot -tail fence along the west side of the outside storage yard. U A 1.0 -foot -tall fence along the remaining south property line of Menard's and northerly along the east lot line to the point where the property jogs to the east. b. No material on the storage racks, adjacent to the fence behind 1101 and 1115 County Road B. shall extend above the 14 -foot -tall fence. c. No more than 2 1/2 feet of the 171 /2 -f oot -tall storage racks shall be visible from the homes t_ o the south that are at street level along County Road B. This excludes those houses that sit higher on a hill. d. Menard's shall be responsible for the safety of the neighbors in regard to the materials stored over the height of the fence. 3. Hours of operation in the storage yard shall be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 4 104 rMaid Cell Inbs 12-ftad A hadn na I onta 4 1 1220 Thai. nnnnagtht QUAReF Ai 111 1 kaild Cal AntAl Pond Q tchal he ca-annartehle far. thin wanilen Iwo %few ftFTMF%WftV6 ovalwoolwa b: 4. An exterior public address system shall not be allowed. 5. All lighting in the storage yard that is not needed for site security shall be turned off after business hours. 8--6. The city council shall not review this permit unless a problem develops or unless the property owner proposes a major, chande to their plans. man that ara at street lemse an Cameahs 12amel B - ? 7. Plowed snow shall be stored away from the southern and eastern property lines to avoid runoff problems on residential property. 4: 8. Menard's shall store all their materials within the fenced storage area. Plant displays shall be pitted outside the .greenhouse. A " annNnah'a .. oftV "ry w,"Now GWW %WVIWG a a VV 5169 . , feed- , 9. Sanitation facilities shall be provided by Menard's for the were employees f na3d in thqu • the %we V%w%ff 6 6%001%% 111W we ow #+a� =�: 10. The owner or operator shall get a building_rermit annually for the greenh 4 11. Greenhouse hours o_ f operation shall � coincide With of ;, enard's. 12. The greenhouse structure shall be tem2 orarv. The owner or o erator shall remove the greenhouse after each three -month season. B. Approve the plans (stamped January 8, 1996) for the proposed Echo Lake temporary greenhouse west of Menard's, based on the findings required by the code. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Repeat this approval again in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for the greenhouse. 2. Patch the parking lot as needed around the greenhouse an.d the proposed parking area. 3. Stripe the parking_ lot as shown on the site plan. Meet parking lot striping requirements as . stated in the city code and comply with ADA (Americans with Disability Act) requirements for handicap parking. This includes the installation of ahandicap- parking sign. 4. Apply to staff for sign permits. 5. There should not be any noise-making machinery or devices allowed that would be a n to any nearby homeowner. 6. Clean the .greenhouse site of any existing debris and keep the area clean during the greenhouse operation. The greenhouse operator .shall not leave any debris behind after the greenhouse business ends each summer. 7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 5 CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed owners of the 20 properties within 350 feet of the proposed greenhouse site. The city received nine replies. Of these, three favored the proposal, one had no comment, two were undecided with comment and three were against. In Favor 1. I think it would be good for the area. There is nothing like it around. (Hoffman Comer Oil Co.) 2 I think it would make a good use of that property and be good for the neighborhood. (Adams - 1112 County Road B) 3. No objection. (Andersen -1101 County Road B) Undecided 1. This area has a traffic congestion problem already. The comer of B and Maplewood Drive (at the HCO Station) is very heavily congested. Are there plans to "re- engineer" this intersection in the near future? If not, adding more retail will cause increased traffic and possible cause for concern. (Reed -1128 County Road B) 2. 1 would like to get a few answers to some questions I have about this project before I say I am in favor of it. a. How many years will this conditional use permit be for? b. Does this permit only allow operation of this business or will it allow operation of other businesses? c. What will be the store's hours? d. Structure description: Temporary or permanent? Materials used to construct it? .Length, height, width, etc.? Will items for sale be stored outside of building? (Forbes - 1 071 County Road B) Against 1. I wasn't for Menard's moving in to begin with. I went to the meeting and said so. It doesn't matter what I say here, you are going to do what you want no matter. The added traffic and trucks in front of my house is hell. (Mechura - 1160 County Road B) 2. It will bring too much traffic to our County Road B. (Occupant -1174 County Road B) 3. 1 believe Menard's already has their hands full Living up to their current conditional use permit. For example, they are not able to maintain the easement on their south border, nor can they keep from piling merchandise higher than the fence. (Bobick - 1115 County Road 8) R REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.12 Acres Existing land use: Undeveloped Property Owner: Menard, Inc. SURROUNDING LAND USES (surrounding the proposed greenhouse) North :. Maplewood Drive and Highway 36 interchange South: Single dwellings and Citgo Motor Fuel Station West: Maplewood Drive and frontage road East: Menard's outdoor storage yard PAST ACTIONS March 28, 1988: The city council approved Menard's CUP. January 23, February 13, March 27 and April 6 1989: The council changed the CUP conditions. The changes were to clarify the screening fence and storage rack height requirements. March 26, 1990: The council reviewed the CUP. November 14, 1994, and September 11, 1995: The council amended the CUP conditions. PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: M -1 (light manufacturing) Zoning: M -1 Ordinance Requirements Section 25 -70 requires that the community design review board (CDRB) make the following findings to. approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in Keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the City's comprehensive municipal plan. 7 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its - neighbors, .and that it. is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 36 -187 requires a CUP for building construction in a. M -1 district that would be closer, than 350 feet to a residential zone. Section 36- 448(b) requires an amended CUP for any enlargement or intensification of use of an existing CUP. Findings for CUP Approval Section 36- 442(a) states the city council must base their approval of a CUP on nine standards. listed these .standards in the resolution beginning on pages 15-1 T. p:sec9lmenards3. mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line / Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 1 4. site Plan 2 5. Mr. StachoWaKs Letter dated January 8, 1996 6. Greenhouse Specifications 7. CUP Resolution 8 Attachment 1 cc 3 4. � •• . O z 1. SUMMIT CT. '�: ►- 2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR. o _ 3. DULUTH CT. ce 6 4. LYDIA ST. to BEAM . AEy 19 BEAM 2880N CR). ti o a f O; C22 3 w , z *` N 2 / Kohlr�nan w v CE Lake Gervis: . w�/ W Lake , KOHLMAN AVE_ • �� ROAD C 2640N �- ,,ouNTY 1 PLAZA CIR 3 r ° P r 2 ALvARADO OR PALM I \ N � n � t Cr Z 3 BELLECREST DR W 4 OfAWILLE DR o�' � o , I 5 MER►DM DR •`. `'T' P N 5 o CT z Lbi CONNOR CO CON NOR g� qVE. AVE. v r 4- CT _�/� DEMON � j Op`' BROOKS • • 2 PvE' o 01 BROOKS w SEX Ts C a • ,�- GERVAIS AVE, r GER VAIS� 4 0 0 N s FR v GRANDVIEW i A P KWY .: U e m VIKING ' DI LOCATION MAP V 4 N • • " ' SHERREN AVE. Kr .- .. ''' . '• ..: '•'' �' v O COPE I 2. •• • ., . ►- Uy \ ::kf�: '`'' LARK I �v t17 AVE. JE. i , •• ►-= ` VIKING DR. v W 60 Keller�� .. Lake ° CO. a RD. N 4 v v LAURIE RD. RD.: r ---- ' ��' • ' cn s ' w x z o ° p V 3 LAURIE CT. 1 .� \� o LELAND RD. 0 W 0 X SANDH URST Q Ln a z O w , �S Y BURKE CT. Cr t� r O o JUNG N AVE. W 6�E Z . .� Y BU�KEA V Maple~ o p a AVE. oc BURKE AVE. o f = 1 EWRIDGE � � �� v ST ? � � � ° 0 3 JG AV 2 E. o A V " �� Mp ; �E• Nr ►- ELDR IDGE L AVE. W LA � W � o Oehriine i BELMONT Lo e �4 CO URSE p,VE. � �`� AV � BELMONT E. AVE. _ AVE. w I SKILLMAN AV. KENw o0D GOLF KELP SKILL _� ! I SKILL MAN AVE. r j 88 W LA D Y I g . L„ i 1 Q W r cr 1 o� b0 0 � U mood RY AN AV. �---� ANON ` AV A. z 1 W a W ! � CC TRN L w >� � � � c "* ROSELAWN O 27 FROST o 6 AVE. E AVE. I Cr { a. ' �., I FE I NTO °o b2 N AVE. v z z I 5 4` o SUMMER o 3 a: �;ZX 1 o Q z N Q T 3 J Isu I MER �►v E. v' w ig`' o ; CT. N f- z ; GORI DON1 ! FRISBIE AV t LOCATION MAP V 4 N Attachment 2 — C j 1 - • ` r oi �— Hc, I I • ; 4 O . — HIGHWAY 3 - r. / A ir t i✓ *52 C � .... :.. X 1 . ; :f�.:•: : .•:•:•:..: : �:• .. ..... . %• :•.. . •" ev � ':'::�'� :: iiii� +�wi�:3►i�ii:- ,•............ •; ;F1•FI•h ................. G s N1 . � .•r:•: /. .... •.:: i• :'i:;i; .: /. {. S M N A R D .Y.• ... • .i :r :.;:. ............. • i :.•'' h :� .. �lli�•:• .... Co ... . .. .......... .... ..... .......... . ........ ... .......... ..... . .. ... .... fi:: f„ ... ...... ........... 5:;: .. .. r. 4 ::;:; ;:fir }:�:�: %:�: %�:::•:.•:•:.:; �:•. i ..• ti ii I 3 :�:� ::•::. :•.•. Y.•.�:�: .....: n I i :......... . r • . •.. ..r •.. /�� .a o w. .J:...... •... i J `• .• ............... . 000i ...... . :•J..•.;..; :.•J.:.•.•.•.•:.. .; :. :•:.... .... ..::...... l 1 i C r :•:.•::•:•:• ::•: .......... IBM it Ax Or X. lop. 7 t i>f.Si 1 T r t •: J :' yr: ti . - - F 112 7- i- �- 4 114 3 , a Sr 1071 , 1081 _ < x, _ 1115 _ ♦.. ♦- Kin M in -- COUNTY 1128 T �- •1108 -�� c �------ �.•�` -�. ^ - - ; .: Q �� 1112 + sin_� �. -- _�;,-:- _ 3i,,� 1136 I C. S I `fir. I 7 Q C.. \� I r � VW/SAAB ' i I • 1 _ i.Y. f - 4 = - 1 s Z — F rM la 'r L Z I G tt I i� 15 14 .i 2255 r I� II 18 C .J • 1 2233 ►', �b 2223 , �.41 u y 1 ' }0 M 13 .1 --- -� - -- .t A.s7ac 1160 1174 33 .3 C- /," , •33 /,a PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 10 4 N Attachment 3 O � C� O � rrrr • r M4LLr 0 r7-r. bm P*oo" "^L.LJ MENARDS 11111 11 llll� 11111 111w am :......00 --- --- -- MENARDS OUTSIDE STORAGE YARD 10, r own '�,� �""; .7 �: i..�:1q�+r.-.. ::" _' _ _ • r r.. ► ..+_ate u i - -- -- � 1 /PROPOSED f 14 meow so was* so 00'aft QD owso 40 ft Soso GREENHOUSE . �, i 14 10 ft Ift ► WkW ow 0% go &a Oft 1 01 8 14 81 *� EXISTING WOODEN SCREENING -FENCE �.-� ..�.� t � �.�_�. 8' 10 FENCE HEIGHTS �� - JAN 0 �o & 14 SITE PLAN I ! 4 11 Attachment 4 Y�� o ,7 fir AS A" LJ% le VA I -lz 44-1ge"s. �E 00 PROPOSED GREEN HOUSE 00 rn 0 M > 0 M � v EXISTING FENCE 12 � 1 Attachment 5 -s `1 Co v 40�;) — 0) -� 4 --.3 *�Izec OUTSIDE TO OUTSIDE o�owu. COVER: White 6 mil. UVI SWE om run 48 Ic n n I o Q WE DOOR 601.011,961 GARDEN MART SPECIFICATIONS WIDTH: 21' -0" COVER: White 6 mil. UVI HOLD DOWN SYSTEM: treated polyethylene 50% 12 mil. flexible poly water „ It LENGTHS: 30 -0 , 48 -0 , shade tubes built into full length 601.011,961 bench supports (both END POLY: Clear 6 mil. UVI sides) HOOP SPACING: 6' -0" treated. polyethylene OPTIONAL (customer .HEIGHT OF STRAIGHT HANGING BASKET PUR- supplied) Concrete block hold down system SIDE WALL: 6' -0" LINS: Four full length basket g HEIGHT TO APEX: 11' -011 purlins OPTIONAL Front and rearwail ELECTRICAL: 115V standard current purlin display (for use with FRAME: 2" dia., 14 ga. VENTILATION: 5' -0" high POLY-VENT 11) galvanized steel tubing POLY -VENT If or SLIDE -SIDE POLY FASTENER: DOORWAY SIZE: 6' -0" SLIDE -SIDE PANELS: Clear, Aluminum Wiggle Wire wide by 6' -8" high 8 mil. polycarbonate for faster installation Attachment 6 14 Attachment 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Greg Stachowiak of Echo Lake Greenhouse is proposing changes to a conditional use permit. The changes include adding a temporary .greenhouse west of the existing outdoor storage yard at 2280 Maplewood Drive. The legal description is: SUB TO ESMTS; PART OF FOL TRACTS SELY OF HWYS 36 & 61; EX S 100 FT PART OF SW 1/4.N OF CO RD B & PART OF SE 1/4 W OF CLIFTON ADD S OF L 107 FT N OF S L OF BLK 15 OF SD ADD EXTENDED & N OF HEINEMANS BELLEVIEW & IN CLIFTON ADD, EX E 240 FT BLKS 15 & 16 & EX E 255 FT BLK 10 & ALSO W 120 FT OF E 255 FT OF N 30 FT OF BLK 10 WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On March 4, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 20 On March 25, 1996, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice .in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property .owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 69 The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 15 80 The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9.. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.. Adherence to the site plan dated March 15, 1988, and the greenhouse plan dated January 8, 1996, unless a change is approved by the city's community design review board. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. Compliance with the following screening -fence requirements: a. The property owner shall continue to have, and keep in a maintained condition, wooden screening - fences as follows: (1) An eight- foot -tall fence running north -south on the west side of 1071 County Road B. This section of fence shall have "no parking" signs displayed. (2) An eight -foot -tall fence running east -west from the northwest comer of 1071 County Road B to the northwest comer of 1101 County Road B. (3) A 14- foot -tall fence behind 1101 and 1115 County Road B; also along the west lot Fine of 1115 County Road B where it abuts Menard's. (4) A 14- foot -tail fence along the west side of the outside storage yard. (5) A 10- foot -tall fence along the remaining south property Fine of Menard's and northerly along the east lot line to the point where the property jogs to the east. b. No material on the storage racks, adjacent to the fence behind 1101 and 1115 County Road B, shall extend above the 14- foot -tall fence. c. No more than 2 1/2 feet of the 17 1/2-foot-tall storage racks shall be visible from the homes to the south that are at street level along County Road B. This excludes those houses that sit higher on a hill. d. Menard's shall be responsible for the safety of the neighbors in regard to the materials stored over the height of the fence. 3. . Hours of operation in the storage yard shall be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 4. An exterior public address system shall not be allowed. 5. All lighting in the storage yard that is not needed for site security shall be turned off after business hours. 6. The city council shall not review this permit unless a problem develops or unless the property owner proposes a major change to their plans. 16 7. Plowed snow shall be stored away from the southern and eastern property lines to avoid runoff problems on, residential property. 8. Menard's shall store all their materials within the fenced storage area. Plant displays shall be permitted outside the greenhouse. 9. Sanitation facilities shall be provided by Menard's for the employees. 10. The owner or operator shall get a building permit annually for the greenhouse. 11. Greenhouse hours of operation shall coincide with those of Menard's. 12. The greenhouse structure shall be temporary. The owner or operator shall remove the greenhouse after each three -month season. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on March , 1996. 17 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MARCH 4, 1996 Call to Order Cltgirman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. 118 ROLL GALL Commissions ester Axdahl Present Commissioner B ny Brueggeman Present Commissioner Barb a Ericson Present Commissioner Lorrain ischer Present Commissioner Jack Frost Present Commissioner Kevin Kittridg Present Commissioner Dave Kopesky Present Commissioner Gary Pearson Present Commissioner William Rossbach Present Commissioner Milo Thompson esent Ill. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Fischer moved approvaW the minutbsof February 20, 1995, as submitted. Commissioner Pearson seconde Ayes—AK,dahl, Ericson, Fischer, Frost, Pearson, Rossbach, Thompson The motion passed. IV. APPROVAL OFAGENDA Abstentions — Brggeman, Kittridge, Kopesky Commissigrfer Frost moved approval of the agenda as submitted. ComXissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes —all e motion passed. V. NEW BUSINESS A. .Menard's Conditional Use Permit Revision — Temporary Greenhouse (2280 Maplewood. Drive) Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts answered questions from the commission. Greg Stachowiak, representing Echo Lake Greenhouse, was present. Mr. Stachowiak had no comment on the staff report or the recommendations. He said they would be renting the property from Menard's and it would be well maintained. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Approval of the resolution which revises the conditional use permit for Menard's outdoor storage yard with the following changes (I have crossed out the deletions and underlined the additions): 1. Adherence to the site plan dated March 15, 1988, and the greenhouse plan dated January 8, 1996, unless a change is approved by the city's community design review board. The director of Community development-may approve minor changes. -2- PFW Compliance with the following screening- fence requirements: a. The prop owner shall continue to have, and keep in amaintained _ condition, wooden screening- fences as follows: A n ei ht -foot -tall. fence running no h -south on the west side of 1.071 County Road B. This section of fence shall have "no, par i "s_ ions_ displayed. An eight- foot -tall fence runnina east -west from the northwest ,corner of 1071 County Road B to the northwest comer of 1101 Cou Road B. Qj A 14. foot-tall fence behind 1101 and 111.5 County. Road B: also along t_ he west lot Fine of 11 County Road B where it abuts Menard's. LQ A 14- foot -tali fence along the west side of the outside storage yard. U5h A_ 10- foot -tall fence along,the remaining south prop erty line of Menar;d's and northerly along the east lot line to the point where the property jogs to the east. b. No material on the storage rr cks, adjacent to the fence behind 1101 and 1115 County _Road _B, shall extend above the 14- foot -tall fence. c No more than 2 1/2 feet of the. 17 1/2-foot-tall storaae racks shall b,_sibl, a from the homes to the south that are at street level along County Road B This excludes those houses that sit higher on a hill. d. Menard's shall be responsible for the safety of the neiahbors in regard to the materials stored over the height of the fence 3. Hours of operation in the storage yard shall be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. ■ • • • • 15 1 W • • • ! • • • • W ID i I r • ■ • • s a • _ • r 0 • T• • ■ ELOIL-01 ill 1111 11P -M M 12&7PAUIJIJU�X�Aw .t - • - - • • • L ■ • • 1 12 9 • • * • _ r IM L ■ ■ ■ • ■ .. ■ • • • 1-111 L; ij M101 f 4 An exterior public address system shall not be allowed. 5. All lighting in the storage yard that is not needed for site security shall be turned off after busin hours. $- 6. The city council shall not review this permit unless a problem develops or unless the prope :w amajor ,change to their plans. Planning Commission - 3 - Min of 03 -04 -96 'too 046 lq ' . - A-: 7. Plowed snow shall be stored away from the southern and eastern property lines to avoid runoff problems on residential property. #: g. INV QLVI O kf V QI loll Mena rd's shall store all their materials within the fenced storage area , Plant diSLplays shall be permitted outside the greenhouse. , 1-�- 9 Sanitation facilities shall be provided by Menard's for the �ricrr en ema.loyee = . • , he fen�ce: 10. The owner or operator shall get a building permit annually for the greenhouse. 11. Greenhouse hour, rs�of , o_peration shall coincide with those of Menard's. 12. The greenhouse structure shall be temporary. The owner or operator shall remove the rg, eenhouse after each three- month season. Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. North Glen Fourth Addition (Castle Avenue): Zoning Map Change, Preliminary Plat, and Inc ed t Yard Setback Ken Robe ssociate planner, presented th staff report. Mr. Roberts an red questions from the commission. missioner Rossbach commented that the drain plan shows most of the development draining to a gully to the southwest, and he d where it goes from there. Russ Matthys, assistant city 'neer, said he asked for a sion of the grading plan. He is requesting that all the runoff from evelopment b ected toward the frontage road. All the drainage would then remain in the natur ist' pattern of flow. Mr. Matthys said they are asking the developer to have no impervio a drainage directed to the south of the lots. Mario Cocchiarella, representi aplewood Developmen , c., was present at the meeting. The commission asked Mr. C iarella about the reference to liens the citizen comments. Mr. Cocchiarella sai is was an issue between the contractor who oped a street, within a development r. Cocchiarella's, in North St. Paul and the city of North S . ul. A maintenance bond wa led by the city of North St. Paul when they contractor didn't pay for r ration of a cur ection that failed. Mr. Cocchiarella explained the procedure where, after the city is a ew road, a maintenance bond is placed on a project for one whole year after it is complete . MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MARCH 12,1996 C: Temporary Greenhouse Proposal-- Menards, 2280 Maplewood Drive Greg Stachowiak, representing Echo Lake Greenhouse, was present at the meeting. Mr. Stachowiak said he had no problems with staff recommendation. He said the greenhouse would operate from April 1 to July 1 and be removed after that. Mr. Stachowiak also said the p asphalt surface to the area would be patched, if necessary, and stripped. He would like to be able to run a banner sign along the front side that will be attached to the greenhouse. Mr, .Stachowiak said a small display, that included some trees or shrubs, would be placed outside the door of the g reenhouse. These items would be brought inside the structure each evening. No additional lighting, other than from Menards' existing lights, or electricity would be used. Boardmember Robinson moved the Community Design Review Board recommend: B. Approval of the plans (stamped January 8, 1996) for the proposed Echo Lake temporary greenhouse west of Menard's, based on the findings required by the code. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Repeat this approval again in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for the greenhouse. 2. Patch the parking lot as needed around the greenhouse and the proposed parking area. 3. Stripe the parking lot as shown on the site plan. Meet parking lot striping requirements as stated in the city code and comply with ADA (Americans with Disability Act) requirements for handicap parking. This includes the installation of a handicap- parking sign. 4. Apply to staff for sign permits and discuss the banners with staff. 5. There should not be any noise- making machinery or devices allowed that would be a nuisance to any nearby homeowner. 6. Clean the greenhouse site of any existing debris and keep the area clean during the greenhouse operation. The greenhouse operator shall not leave any debris behind after the greenhouse business ends each summer. 7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Boardmember Johnson seconded. Ayes —all �y MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Zoning Map Change and Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Castle Avenue, east of White Bear Avenue PROJECT: North Glen Fourth Addition DATE: March 12, 1996 INTRODUCTION Project Description Action iiy Oo � En d ors e ( Date Mr. Mario Cocchiarella, representing Maplewood Development, Inc., is proposing to develop lots for five homes. The project's name is North Glen Fourth Addition. This plat would be on a 2.22 - acre site south of Castle Avenue, east of White Bear Avenue. (See the maps on pages 9 and 10.) Requests To develop this site, Mr. Cocchiarella is requesting that the city approve: 1. A change to the city's zoning map. This change would be from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1 (S) (small -lot single dwellings). (See the property line /zoning map on page 10.) 2. A preliminary plat for five lots. (See the proposed preliminary plat on page 11.) 3. Increased front setbacks for the houses on Lots 1 -5. The developer is showing front setbacks on the proposed grading plan (page 12) of 50 feet for these lots. Please also see his letter on pages 14 and 15. BACKGROUND On September 24, 1990, the city council made several approvals for the North Glen Third Addition. These included approving the concurrent annexation /detachment, the vacation of Ariel Street north of Cope Avenue and the preliminary plat. On November 15, 1990, the council approved the North Glen Third Addition final plat. This plat created seven lots for houses and three outlots for future development on Castle Avenue. DISCUSSION Rezoning As proposed, Mr. Cocchiarella wants to plat the property with 70- foot -wide single- family lots. The city has zoned the site R -1 (single dwellings). In the R -1 zoning district, the minimum lot width is 75 feet. As such, the developer wants the city to change the zoning to R -1(S) (small -lot single dwelling). The minimum lot width in this district is 60 feet. The Maplewood City Code has four findings the council must make to approve a rezoning. (See the required findings in the reference section on page 7.) With Highway 36 to the north, the water tower to the south and the M -1 property to the west, the proposed R -1(S) zoning is appropriate and meets the findings required by code. Open Space and Parks The Maplewood Open Space Committee called this property Site 131. They ranked this site 49th out of the 66 they rated and second out of the four they rated in this neighborhood. Maplewood has not included this site in its park or open space acquisition plans. Some neighbors prefer to keep this property for open space or a park. Maplewood would have to buy this property to keep it as open space. Another concern of some neighbors was the amount of park land available in the area. They feel there is a need for additional park land. Preliminary Plat Density and Lot Size The proposed lot sizes range from 16,101 square feet to 22,294 square feet with an average lot size of 19,616 square feet. The average lot size is larger than many lots on Cope Avenue .and Adel Street. These range in size from 10,125- 19,600 square feet. The city code requires at least 7,500 square feet above a drainage easement and 60 feet of width in the R -1(S) zone. All of the proposed lots meet or exceed these standards. Sanitary Sewer and Water To serve this property, the developer is proposing to extend the sanitary sewer and water from Ariel Court to the site. (See the utility plan on page 13.) North Saint Paul wants the developer to loop the water main from Adel Court north to Castle Avenue east to Seventh Street. If North Saint Paul requires this loop, the developer also will need to extend the water main to the west to serve the lots in Maplewood. The proposed sanitary sewer would be in an easement in the rear yards of the home sites. This sewer would connect to the North Saint Paul sewer in Ariel Court. Maplewood should require the developer to have the utility plans approved by the North Saint Paul City Engineer before the Maplewood City Engineer approves them. Increased Front Setbacks The proposed grading plan (page 12) shows front setbacks of 50 feet for the houses on Lots 1- 5. They are proposing the increased setbacks because of the highway and the depth of the lots. Moving the houses back from Castle Avenue will allow the houses to be farther from the highway. These proposed setbacks would meet the city's standards for larger front yards. This is because the proposed house sites would not affect the drainage or the privacy of the adjacent homes. These lots range from 216 to 319 feet deep. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 16. This resolution changes the zoning map from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1(S) (small -lot single dwellings). This change is for the North Glen Fourth Addition plat. The reasons for this change are those in the code and because the developer plans to develop the site for small -lot single dwellings. 2 B. Approve the. North Glen Fourth Addition preliminary plat (received by the city on February 7, 1996). Before the city council approves the final plat, a developer shall complete the following conditions: 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Pay the city for the cost of any traffic - control and street- identification signs. d. Provide all necessary easements. 2. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. 3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall: (1) Include .proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home. (2) Show sedimentation basins as required by the watershed board. (3) Show housing styles that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large trees. c. Provide a tree plan for the city engineer's approval before grading or final plat approval. This plan shall show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan also must show the size, species and location of any trees that the developer will plant as replacement trees. All trees that the developer will plant shall be at Feast 2 -1/2 inches in diameter. There shall be no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. d. The city engineer shall not approve the utility plans until after the North Saint Paul Engineer approves the plans. 4. Change the plat as follows: a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. ' 3 5.* Provide all easements required by the city engineer. These shall include any drainage easements for the off -site drainage areas that this project would affect. If the developer decides to final plat. part of the preliminary plat, the city may waive any conditions that do not .apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. C. Approve front setbacks of 50 feet for Lots 1 -5, North Glen Fourth Addition. 4 CITIZEN COMMENTS We asked the nearby property owners for their opinion of these requests. We sent surveys to the property owners within. 350 feet of the site. Out of 39 properties, we received 18 replies. 13 were for the requests, 3 were against, 1 had comments and 1 had no comment. Those for the requests had the following comments: 1. It will help the value and development of my area. (Anderson - 1965 Cope Avenue) 2. I am for this as long as Cope Avenue is not opened and made a through street from White Bear Avenue. (Hofacker - 1974 Cope Avenue) 3. Single - family homes on lots beats anything else you could put there. (Backer - 1986 Cope Avenue) 4. If the homes are comparable to the surrounding homes. (Hurt - 1994 Cope Avenue) 5. We do not want apartments going in or a warehouse! I am concerned about the developer though, as he caused us in the cul -de -sac to have liens on our homes. If it is for houses, we are for it. (Smith - 2284 Ariel Court) 6. I would rather have private homes than apartments or businesses in that area. (Kiffe - 2290 Ariel Court) 7. 1 would rather see homes located there than commercial property. (McLeod - 2284 Jennifer Lane) 8. l would like to see single- family homes on this piece of property instead of a business or apartments. (Plan - 2303 7th Street) 9. We would rather see residential than commercial. (Caldwell - 2315 7th Street) 10. I would rather see it as residential rather than commercial /business. (Heliquist - 2321 7th Street) 11. It would be compatible with the homes to the south and east. The only alternative is more M.1 land. (Hillcrest Development - Minneapolis) Those against the requests had the following comments: 1. This would displace a lot of wildlife we have living in the area. We like the open field. Apark would be nice -there are a lot of children in the area. (Maiwurm - 1968 Cope Avenue) 2. We already lost a home to the City of North Saint Paul and we do not want it to happen to our new neighbors. We chose our new home because of all the woods behind us and we enjoy the wildlife and birds. The property should be left alone, the woods left intact, so we can continue to enjoy Mother Nature. There is too much development as it is and houses are being built too close together. Young families with children need space to grow, to learn 5 about nature and to share it with -their children. Do not take that from them. (Henderson - 2283 Adel Court) 3. We would like .to see a natural barrier between the houses here and the highway. Sell it to the county and leave the property as a natural open space area. If this Mario is the same guy that developed our properties here, be careful. We all had liens placed on our properties because he failed to pay for curb and gutter work that was done. Because of this, some of us had trouble refinancing. If I had not done the leg work myself with the attorneys, I would not have been able to refinance and -get a better interest rate. The lot also looks like a very low place to build on. How is this going to effect our properties? if they level everything before they build, what happens to all the nice trees and shrubbery? All of us here would like to see it Left a natural area. (Kaup - 2289 Adel Court) We. also received the following comments: We are 4K with the project if you can get the occupants of the yellow house (in North Saint Paul) to clean it up. If not, we would let prospective buyers know about the. problems that may make them think twice about living there. What will happen to the drainage ravine behind our property? It is the drainage for the area in question - will the contractor fill it in? (Swanson - 2296 Ariel Court) 2 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Gross Area: Proposed Density: Existing land use: 2.25 acres 2.22 homes per acre Undeveloped SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Highway 36 north of Castle Avenue East: Single dwellings in North Saint Paul South: Water tower and single dwellings West Undeveloped property that the city has planned and zoned M -1 (Light manufacturing) PLANNING The existing R -1 (single dwellings) land use designation is for low density residential land uses like single dwellings. TREES There is a mix of trees on the site. These range from scrub shrubs and trees to large oak trees. Most of the large trees are in North Saint Paul. The city should require a tree plan before the developer grades the site. SOILS The Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District informed us that the soils on this site are suitable for development if the developer controls the erosion. The District recommends that the developer get specific soils data before developing the site. CRITERIA FOR ZONING MAP CHANGE Findings for Rezoning Section 36 -4.85 of the zoning code requires that the city council make the following findings to rezone property: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 7 p :sec11 /nglen4th.mem Attachments: 1 Locabon Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Proposed North Glen Fourth Addition Preliminary Plat 4 Proposed Grading and Drainage Plan 5. Proposed Utility Plan 6. 2-6 -96 letter from Mario Cocchiarella 7. Zoning Map Change Resolution 8. Project Plans (separate attachment) 8 Attachment 1 � o z D ++ P w EDGE . DEMONT AVE. t m Ln BROOKS - A1 E . cn AVE. EL V '''i E-- kN T Z oI-: row '� • AVE . .1 N s 0 % - Q cc Q �._.._ t R'VA1 S (� .VE. z _ CT. Y R Cr luc eod take CAS �E POE- o AV E. C E �►''= . �- . �n _ G � to LARK Q AVE. • a � cn � Y S.nrw►oo+d o LAURIE 1700 340( AVE. o w c; Z z CO. Q Ca�r�uni *'- (.� BU AVE Ce; ~ ;f w� U �� >> >: 0 1 2 Jahn GMnn o �i3 SCA Go city Hco HARRIS AVE. Li ROSEWOOD AVE. N. Cr. RosEwoO D RAM C0UNrT#Y Q. RS NG HONE AND Q AVE. S. NU FA;R GROUNDS NORTH SAINT o`er c� �9 � 'AY AVE - GO ODRIC H HO�.LO AL C� it cl �' i ¢� . l7 COURSE �. 68 1 o �... 4 Li Q� t I s mmt-� AVE. AR ,4 x >- <18> 4. v)- d %r* Grv*&icn �n C o W PW* O y • O .w RIPLEY A %vt. RI PLEY AV I d KINGSTON a� �;,,� �n K IN OSTON A%, �. AVE. z w . �E Y �- W PRbCE AVE.. n Y MC LN °D LARPENTEUR LOCATION MAP �� 4 N Attachment 2 ■ THE HOME DEPOT ■ o .I �+ it I. _--- .- ---- - - - - -, HIGHWAY 36' 0. FsM 3 T s.4 �Z _..? = CASTLE AVEN - - - -- - - • - - - - - - - 6 �.. , 1 t 1 14 f 81 J * 2� 27 28 29 30 1 I 18 19 20 21122 ;? •.... .2 �I M -, A c {_ ► wl 13 12 '1I 10 9 - � IW .� — *.- WAT E R 1937 I -- - -� 9 In Pjn A-) i 7 I�dI7�,IrF, oO `y . ` � � p •�v. - r / O � /il• ' - r tl � 11 1 11 1 I V V V r. . A f a � �- \� r `-T`� . _ 7_1 J - COPE AVENUE - - - - - - o —.- - l4 L�i.o7 - �o { N 00 0 (D a 60 7 , (Xi 1 I ., w a� c� `: -; c� co o, v� ; F- N R T f H , I o 2- -1 r - T- ,� r ♦- ` z 5 ^ g (38) foo '79 2 w ... 79 1 t3 a e W -- - - - - - -- W W \39� - - - - -- - -- ',v�c 2•�t�90 I 9 2(33�o t�s' 0 ' W r'�- hoc ZS2 I� (,2t� W = 4 �.. 2 13 �" - �z�i S ` (r z o� tile- 7S K " •" 21 L t Q v - �.�., t ,9 e W z U 1 ..,. 3 ,• , z:� DDC. z,4 �342I ?T" 7S 73 .E 2 i I.� ♦ � ) (� (3 4 �/� °_' .,zsT — — — — -- -- — 123 1 �'� ' ` . 52.4 ►x ( ) W 1�� 1� %5 E C N C 1 (42 .�� 5 �4 , N( c Qo, � ,30 moo �� 7S.ot R OAD 15 0 9 i LAURIE s.,3 - 90AS , 3 ?5 .G7wc'N is C9g) 2 X rS i1 n . -, .. m -� - 1 p i�o i• (62. Y,,.:Fgo)v �" 16 C48� 7+ r2:6 7 -27 9 r obi I (34,� 5 SITE PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 'Q 10 N D 050 z Q cry z Attachment 3 t� 1 Z � 1 f J.� ► � � � ii � 'i /f li J r : v iii. .� L� l 1 SERVICE IIO�G 1R. �. � i In M TYPI A ESYj._QZZ,I, JvPkAL L OT AM- J klw 01. liwoctt LM� 1 "111acM 110 Lot Moo 54 il. Lot No. 1 ?.400 LM 1104 n w C 0 w L too 1e0 srxt w FW EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PARCEL A AND 11 OtwA C. NORM GLEN THM Ao0O10N. ecowd" M aw ►eowMd MM Ywew That pail of .rate #Wmal Wool a wow OwWAs 5 on.l t.. WRIN GAIN lH" ApWTIOM, 4c to ohs loosed" pot ulwaa. arto "le «A w ewwwy a 6" of M n Ne. M 6 No arNwaL.rly w M W 4. Sae. /. fmfm Gun lMll 1Trt - t�Tf. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PARCEL A AND 8 Par441 A TM • «t AO 00 f90 of Otr1104 C. NORTH 0144 IMM 40110k, a"ofdw►p to t#9 fewo w ON vwrw. 1/etCN a Tw paA W vacated Awl.0 St#w vw�p oa00en ww east ww a Otrl►ot 0 and the 0094 wo of Qd101 C. NORTH GLEN TIMD AOWT*N. oeeo," to the recwow pw1 1lweol, wW ymq oNooen the - trot WW a Stou T►6nr MM.�yy►f..0�ot Irc !1 a" the herttwool" we w let 4, 11tec� ►. "a *0 1H Ott" Twto AaaT10N, is"O r a" saw WAN L. eA,MI w aw "m so" a wow. LOT AND AREA TABULATION - PARCEL A AND B Vocowd *AM Suess - G.W4 Sq.wre rem 14 0 ">Lb Acr« 0" C • Tow 3i,5f0 es/ M ►acct A • 14,440 Squoae 190 0 3 Air« perC a - y�,��p tow • if.li0 97W hvft 104.0 Neo 0 M Acme ftLoreo« of Lots 2 Av tp9 L.at #$" t 4. )OS $q. it orw�r 2.04 Ut^/AO. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION - LOTS 1 - 0 Ou" A ofld OvUet I. IIOIHN OWt TIWtO A00110h. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1 - 6 L4'ls 1,2.3,4, oM S. Vlach I M NORM GLEN FONRM Aoot110k, LOT AND AMA TABULATION - LOTS 1 - d 10401 Area 2 25 Alias lborroor at Lots 9 *ova Wl ArM 19.616 Sq FL ift Hwy» 2 22 Lrwt/AC. I SCHOELL k MADSON. INC. F01"ER DEVELOPER PRWECT NAME/SHEET nn 0 A,. • NORTH QLRN FOURTH ADDITION _ ISM TMT .ONLt*M, lilM APLEMIO OD DEVELOPMENT W04400AK% ,� •e,,oe P NY PLAT iAas3M - pub AT • AR S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 61302 -150 SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT 11 IJ low r � i I. C ao. .: ' ( 1. Ext�� l0t0 K WA1 O NItuTY Q N Attachment 4 i oil OIMrEry►r pULVERT; - ` M � �,,,,.►�' 'tea,. "'� , �• ._� 00 sm + SOYD: SF�Y ' r 1 � ..PL � .ML � � � � 000 •� ' \rte / _ • ttlTt � � � � �. a _ ILOGO 1, /• 1 0 ..1r I w O 0 i �- Y r� V 1 rr b i b i I. n W o �o 100 )so SC41 w stn I SCHOELL A It1ADSON, 9 C. OWNER /DEVELOPER FPR(IJ T NAME ME WL rEBTM . VANOWAWTAt 80 ORTH QM FOU RTH ADDITION 10W SAYMA . , WR MAPLEWOOD DEVELOPMENT MINARY GRADING i DRAINAGE PLAN AT AR S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 61302 -130 SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 12 4 N LEGEND ODOM C01114 00WOUR - -- ••M�� -�� ODOM I WO f -o: 0own ow oWMA ODWF f POWR OF pM09 ---- -- OtNO1v 00AMM ARMW DDIMU U80 INO IM 00 a NAT Lor KOO no a ~ offm t011L w C a Mou�c� COW.) 00000000000000 00 R am" amw wMa I SCHOELL A It1ADSON, 9 C. OWNER /DEVELOPER FPR(IJ T NAME ME WL rEBTM . VANOWAWTAt 80 ORTH QM FOU RTH ADDITION 10W SAYMA . , WR MAPLEWOOD DEVELOPMENT MINARY GRADING i DRAINAGE PLAN AT AR S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 61302 -130 SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 12 4 N Attachment 5 w[TUw CoN+E CT1oN to Ex►9 " Tr ru, ►ERMUN W/ r GATE VALVE SOUTM SEA � TR. M o . 1 d F I— T T — F — T —7 \ ►rtWUwT r GATE Vk I 7 a BLOCK 1 wr. ��wre 20 DOI wom unury NT T I --- ExW#4 a ct t �KM EASEMENT I � r 1 1 f2 v (;A. IIo •`L t � 1 `�. \ � \ . ` ! • 111, � ` '� /� CT 1C o1M0 V AT MN. SM21 111 I.IRI�II •� 1 I - �� / LEGEND no IQ a WMAM 1 1 II 1 / Oti1QED � 0� IWAWf tT1E1t I I ODOM 001,1►10 shloll MN *D4010 W1ATUN 1 I� a 1 b�b I I SCHOELL 0 MADSON. INC. OWNER /DEVELOPER PROJECT NAME TITLE = o+oM+Erns . wMEtiola • n�ces W TES E I K DEVE NORTH GLEN FOURTH ADDITION � M , YUTA . MAPLEW OD . AM , O so= PRKM11NARY UTILITY PLAN D ATE, ANUARY, 1 S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 61302 -150 SHEET 3 OF 3 UTILITY PLAN 13 I I n a w e bib 66 AVE.) 0 so A loo 150 I SCALE ►►+ US I M'~ r arc vKVE� 4 N a plewood DEVELOPMENT COIVSTR INC. 3030 Granada Avenue North • Suite A Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 (612) 777 -6869 Office (612) 777 -8007 Fax February 6, 1996 Mr. Ken Roberts Assistant City Planner City. of Maplewood 1830 E. county Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Roberts: Attachment 6 This letter will serve as our narrative summary of the request for rezoning on the parcel under consideration by your staff proposed as "North Glen 4th Addition." As you know, we are requesting that this property be rezoned from R -1 to R -1(S) and that the front yard setback be altered to allow for 50' setbacks. These requests are being made for the following reasons: First, the subject property's proximity to Highway 36 necessitates that we retail the lots at an extremely modest value. To achieve this end, the scaling of the lots to an average of 70' in width helps us to gain an additional lot in this project. (It is important to note that the overall square footage of each lot remains far in excess of even the R -1 requirements ). Second, the progression of higher density parcels as the proximity to the highways increase is a natural planning method that permeates most cities. The rezoning from R -1 to R -1 (S) is a fairly mild request considering this issue and is certainly within the realm of reasonableness. Third, the increased setback from the frontage road will help relieve the noise generated from the highway. This is also a feature that will help to satisfy the requirements set forth by the FHA with regard to noise pollution standards. Fourth, when I originally asked for and was granted the rezoning on this site, the request for rezoning to R -1 from M -1 was never envisioned to be a restriction on our ability to finish the site with single family homes. We simply did not calculate the exact lot dimensions at the time these parcels were platted into outlots. 14 LAND DEVELOPMENT • CONSTRUCTION a DESIGN CONSULTATION MN Builder License #1011 Finally, the 70' width will be more consistent with the 65' wide lots allowed by North St. Paul on the adjacent lots shown as parcels .A & B on the preliminary plat. This consistency will provide for a more uniform site plan and, I think, a better looking project in the end. Kerr, please - note that this preliminary plat application is proposed with a request to reapportion the existing assessments on the property across the lots in the project equally. As.you may be aware, once these Lots are sold, whatever mortgage company is involved will demand the payoff of the assessment on each lot so as to accelerate the entire payoff -of the outstanding assessments on these parcels. Thank you for your help in submitting this application. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Best Regards, Mario J. occhiarella MJC /mc 15 Attachment 7 RESOLUTION: ZONING MAP CHANGE WHEREAS, Mario Cocchiarella applied for a change in the zoning map from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1(S) (small -lot single dwellings). WHEREAS, this change applies to the property south of Castle Avenue east of White Bear Avenue. The legal description is: Outlots A and B, North Glen Third Addition, in SEC 11 TN 29 RN 22 (PINS 11- 29 -22 -31 -0049 and 0050). WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On March 4, 1996 the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the change. 2. On March 25, 1996, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above. described change in the zoning map for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The .proposed change will not substantially . injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. The applicant is proposing to develop the site with small -lot single dwellings. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on March 25, 1996. 16 • • LIOTP I • _ • v loo O r wed srtzlw shall be stored awa from the southern and eastern property4ines t- - off probIe?i-,.t,,s on residential propert ' Ar • • a I I OU Lei • • • • _ • • • - • • • • 0 00 AF • • • ' • r• Lei 01-15 • • • • 400 00 0 •• s _• • • •• •• • _ lxfenard _ - • jj- -- -• • r• 1° • • _ • -�•- -• • •- g reen h o use. Ow- rev r• e • • • v- v • •• e► Tila I • • • • • • e • • • • .�• • _ • r • _ • U&I I - • • • • • e • • • • • ° • + • • • 111 %A L6191 • I • • • • • • • III IV e • • O v■�- �- �..�- ��■i•�•r -ria■ ■ice ■iw�■►•�► �■ r_ �i�tii- �■ r _��r- _i2- �► i��,�_�r.11 ■ie �,� - 10. The owner or operat6r shall get a building p ermit , a rInually for tft areenhouse. 11. Greenh u e rs of o era ion shall coincide with those of Menard's. 12. The re Ouse structur shal be t m ora . The owner or operat sha emove the a reenh6us e after each three-m sealon. Z e ssioner Rossbach seconded. Ayes —all motion passed. B. North Glen Fourth Addition (Castle Avenue): Zoning Map Change, Preliminary Plat, and increased Front Yard Setback Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts answered questions from the commission. Commissioner Rossbach commented that the drainage plan shows most of the development draining down to a gully to the southwest, and he asked where it goes from there. Russ Matthys, assistant city engineer, said he asked for a revision of the grading plan. He is requesting that all the runoff from the development be directed toward the frontage road. All the drainage would then remain in the natural, existing pattern of flow. Mr. Matthys said they are asking the developer to have no impervious surface drainage directed to the south of the lots. Mario Cocchiarelia, representing Maplewood Development, Inc., was present at the meeting. The commission asked Mr. Cocchiarelia about the reference to liens from the citizen comments. Mr. Cocchiarella said this was an issue between the contractor who developed a street, within a development of Mr. Cocchiarella's, in North St. Paul and the city of North St. Paul. A maintenance bond was called by the city of North St. Paul when they contractor didn't pay for restoration of a curb section that failed. Mr. Cocchiarelia explained the procedure whe after the city accepts a new road, a maintenance bond is placed on a project for one whole year after it is completed. Planning Commission -4- Minutes of 03 -04 -96 David Kaup, 2289 Adel Court, was concerned about the placement of the sewer and water for this .development. He felt some of the residents of Adel Court would lose the oak trees in their backyards. Mr. Matthys said the existing Maplewood utilities were water at the end of the old German Street right -of -way on the frontage road and sanitary sewer at German and Cope Avenue. it would be costly, if not impossible because of grades, to connect sanitary sewer from this location. M.r. Matthys said it would be much easier to connect sanitary sewer the way the developer has proposed it. The North St. Paul engineer apparently desires the water main be looped from Adel Court to the frontage road to 7th Street. Mr. Cocchiarella indicated on a map the location of the 15- foot -wide easement for sanitary sewer and the 12- foot -wide easement prepared specifically for water main. North St. Paul requests the utilities be : installed in this manner because they prefer to have no "dead- ends" in their system because water begins to smell and becomes distasteful when it sits in the Fine. He added that they do not plan to take out any trees outside the existing easements, but will be coming very close to them. Commissioner Thompson moved the Planning Commission recommend tabling approval of the North Glen Fourth Addition (Castle Avenue) until engineering questions with the city of North St. Paul are resolved. There was no second so the motion died. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which changes the zoning map from R -1 (single dwellings) to R-1 (S.) (small -lot single dwellings). This change is for the North Glen Fourth Addition plat. The reasons for this change are those in the code and because the developer plans to develop the site for small -lot single dwellings. B. Approval of the North Glen Fourth Addition preliminary plat (received by the city on February 7 1996). Before the city council approves the final plat, a developer shall complete the following conditions: 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b..* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Pay the city for the cost of any traffic- control and street - identification signs. d. Provide all necessary easements. 2. The developer shall complete a.11 grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. 3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. Planning Commission -5- Minutes of 03 -04 -96 b. The grading plan shall: (1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home. (2) Show sedimentation basins as required by the watershed board. (3) Show housing styles that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large trees. c. Provide a tree plan for the. city engineer's approval before grading or final plat approval. This plan shall show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan also must show the size, species. and location of any trees that the developer will plant as replacement trees. All trees that the developer will plant shall be at least 2 -1/2 inches in diameter. There shall be no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. d. The city engineer shalt not approve the utility plans until after the North Saint Paul Engineer approves the plans. 4. Change the plat as follows: a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. 5.* Provide all easements required by the city engineer. These shall include any drainage easements for the off -site drainage areas that this project would affect. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the city may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. C. Approve front setbacks of 50 feet for Lots 1 -5, North Glen Fourth Addition. Commissioner Fischer seconded. Commissioner Pearson requested discussion of an amendment to the motion. He proposed adding "e." to B.3. which would require replanting a sufficient number of 2 -Y2" trees to provide a buffer between the south adjoining properties. Mr. Pearson said the tree replacement requirement in the recommendations did not specifically apply to the south boundary. Mr. Roberts suggested the commission add a sentence to Item B.3.c. to address this concern. Mr. Pearson asked to have "the developer will plant, as replacement trees, a sufficient number to provide buffer on south adjoining properties" added to B.3.c. Commissioner Rossbach asked when buffers between residential developments started becoming a requirement. Commissioner Fischer responded that this would be for replacement of any oaks killed by adjacent grading close to the property line. She emphasized that this would not be as a buffer, but a replacement of damaged property that is presently existing, if damage should occur. Commissioner Rossbach said there was not a clear definition of buffer in this area. Commissioner -6- Planning Commission Minutes of 03 -04 -96 Fischer asked Commissioner Pearson it the motion could be clarified to say that any trees, of Whatever size that the code covers, that go down because of this work will be replaced. Commissioner Pearson explained that, whether the utilities are jacked or dug, he wants to be assured that there will be replantation of any damage to quality trees in that area. He was not Looking for additional buffer. Commissioner Rossbach asked if this discussion was being limited to the areas where either a sewer or water was being installed in Maplewood. Commissioner Pearson specified that it would - be limited to any work that would affect the rear lot line of the Maplewood proposed development on the.south. He thought there was a considerable amount of ambiguity in that neither the Maplewood nor the North St. Paul city engineer have seen and approved this plat and no tree plan has been submitted. Ms. Coleman said we cannot require trees to be planted in the city of North St. Paul. She stated that, if a tree plan is submitted that meets the Maplewood code, it would be difficult to require the planting of additional trees. Commissioner Thompson said that a tree plan can look beautiful on paper, but two years later an owner may have to remove dying trees. The ' damage is not apparent immediately. Russ Matthys suggested that trees are less susceptible to being shocked when work is done in the spring or late in the fall. Commissioner Kittridge commented that the utility lines are coming from North St. Paul and the damage that occurs on the North St. Paul side of these utilities is something that must be controlled by that city. Commissioner Pearson withdrew his motion to amend the original motion. Ayes — Axdahl, Fischer, Rossbach, Kopesky, Frost, Kittridge Nays — Brueggeman, Ericson, Pearson, Thompson The motion passed. Hill-Murray High School Conditional Use Permit (2625 Larpenteur Avenue) Ken berts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Frost asked to ve Item 8 "d to the recommendation. This would require 30 trees to be planted for s ning between the w fields and the homes on Knoll Circle. Commissioner Thompso ggested addressing the p ing issue now as part of this expansion. Rich Gray, of Toltz, King, 11, Anderson and Associates (TKDA) id the catch basin on the north field has been installed her catch basins on the plans be added as the fields and track are regraded and improved. As pa f the wetland mitigate performed in the fall, a depression was formed and two small wetlands we created. C issioner Rossbach inquired about the need for some type of sedimentation basin, is rly at the end of the catch basins coming from the activity field, as well as the parking lot. C sioner Frost proposed requiring a turf management plan. Mr. Gray said they h no proble with the requested 30 -foot setback for the bleachers. Mr. Gray asked what the c' considered "impervious" because on walking /jogging trail some of the areas do come clo within the 50 -foot setback, in particular the tenance drive He also asked if the back for the baseball field (fencing) could infringe into tha a. Mr. Roberts said the .buffer ar s intended to have no disturbance, including fence. Jim Weste use said the bad ksto in place already. He said it was even more important, with the 50 -foot er, is to be abl get emergency vehicle to the upper part of the performance field. Mr. Westerho and r. Gray also answered questions from the commission. s -/ MEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuir er Acti by Counc ty From: Bruce K. Anderson, f r s & ecreation �n . . Endorse Subs: Kohlman Lake Overlo . Moci�fieA. Date: March 19, 1996 ReJ ectecA......,......�.... For the March 25, 1996 City Council Meeting Date Introduction The Park and Recreation Commission and city staff have been ursuin the feasibil of ac u 0 p g ty q g and developing a park in the Kohlman Lake Overlook Neighborhood for the past year. This has become a high priority for both staff and the Park and Recreation Commission, due to the limited amount of land available in a heavily populated area. This is the last area designated within the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan for a Neighborhood Park. The city received a Purchase Agreement from Mr. &Mrs. Best to purchase their land for $25,000 per acre. The City retained Dahlen &Dwyer to complete an appraisal on the property. The appraisal has the value of the 7.2 acres at $180,000. Backizround The City Council has received a petition from the neighbors in the Kohlman Lake Overlook Neighborhood to acquire and develop a Neighborhood Park. During the past twelve months, we have implored a number of options, ranging from purchasing developed lots to property in Little Canada. The city has negotiated in good faith for two properties; the first being owned by Mr. & Mrs. Best, which is 3.6 acres in size and the Frattalone/Mogren parcel, which is 3.5 acres in size. This was the first priority for acquisition from the Park and Recreation Commission and city staff for a Neighborhood Park. The project was not budgeted in the 1996 Capital Improvement Plan, but there is adequate dollars in the P.A.C. Fund to acquire the Best property. The city has not been able to reach a formal agreement for the Frattalone/Mogren property at this time for two reasons; the first being the proposed value and benefit of storm water improvements installed on the site; and secondly the possible acquisition of an outlot and trail easement along Walter Street. Recommendation It is staffs recommendation that the city acquire approximately 3 acres of property from Mr. & Mrs. Best at a cost of $25,000 per acre. The exact acreage would be determined by a survey at the city expense. The monies for the acquisition would be from the city P.AC. Funds. It should be noted that staff will continue to negotiate to purchase the Frattalone/Mogren parcel. Staff further recommends that the city review the feasibility of developing single family homes off of Frank .Street to offset the acquisition and development cost for a Neighborhood Park in the Kohlman Lake Overlook Neighborhood. This issue would be considered as part of the negotia- tion process with the Frattalone/Mogren parties. DAB ILEN & DV%TYER INC. General Description: Fee Owners: Address: PID #'s: Land Size: Improvements: Zoning: Highest &Best Use: Utilities: 'Estimated Market Value: Date of Value Estimate: Appraiser: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kohlman Lake Park Overlook is a .proposed osed acquisition of , two adjacent parcels by the city of Maplewood for park and recreational purposes. Albert L. & Florence D. Best Frank Frattalone. Frattalone Parcel: 1134 West County Road D Best Parcel: 1138 West County Road D Frattalone Parcel: 0429 -22 -12 -0054 Best Parcel: 04-29-22-12-0011 Frattalone Parcel: 3.58 Acres Best 3.63 Acres SUBJECT PROPERTY: 7.21 Acres None Farm-Residential Single family residential development after assemblage of the parcels. All municipal utilities available. $180,1000 March 5, 1996 Dwight W. Dahlen, MAI SREA Dahlen & Dwyer, Inc. 1260 Norwest Center Tower St, Paul, MN 55101 (612) 224 -1381 w iw - • _ �� Q8.2G t� 0 3 ,& s ►. 84ac . ~ O p • 5 cxe. d x ( 3S)� , a r LO In C4 So 140 A S 1 4 �2 s� Csb1 1.1 __ 2 t 1.2 t' - , •39 4 j �; r• 0 0 5 4�� I t. 5 � ) �- 433 _ � tim 4 00.5) 6 � � • 130.04 a 7 � .' (4p 0) O 3 34at ` � � N (�8 3 0 7 „ 190.30 Ct 86 4.E 11r. 3 4 2 ac , p 9 m N 430 - 010 i i -- Asa ES 6 r no 469693 1 K. S. P.TVoR.L . 4 MAI �. 140-33 150 a �►.�c 9 � l 10 9 145 2 4 o C 34) w (44) � :W 1 (7) .40 r S 2 41 r (33) (54) —� 140.27 143)1 7 z.3 r 7(32) r �n 12 4 N 4n. 27 60) • IQ V) r r J (Cr (001 < J J (30) 1-- to'a ac Z 1 27 1 a h h - c a) _ ■ C�) r• 4 129) r r �50) 1 1 - 1-19 37 3 1 (17', - - -- - - -- O �d 14 -o t3�•� 0 13 0 ( 10) 152 2.3 e I - 1 (38) 3`� 2 ap C6 2� � �. 2 C3 7) c 1 4 0. 2:E _ tLK ' AA . eV U) 1 59 0 2.9 0.02 �--. � (48) 2 2 , 1 � � I �,, 1 � � P. �►9. ► 4 (35) � � ^ 1 19.3$ m 34 ) ,� U9. � 3 , 7 -- e. ` � L Y D IA AVE, 2 1 3 {34 37 �( }2 .. ( ;7 tea\ ■ LEGEND Larder Parcels'mmmmm■ SUBJECT PROPERTY Frat Best Parcel P el T rans. Easement em" amino &Amwm .Z— Z MEMORANDUM To. City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Sign ordinance Amendment — Residential Distri r�ct Signs DATE: November 20, 1995 INTRODUCTION 40ti by C ou nc RndQ-rsed Re jeeted�... Date Staff is requesting that the city council change the maximum size allowed for ground- mounted signs for churches, apartments, townhouses, schools, libraries communi institutions. these � itY centers or other Present) y, ese facilities may have a ground sign no larger than 15 square The: community review board � q e feet. Y , and (CDRB) may allow up to 32 square feet, based on the following factors (signs over 32 square feet : require a variance): ) 1. Acreage of the total development 2. Design of the sign, including lighting 3. Setback and visibility from a public roadway 4. Need for identification by the applicant 5. Public safety concerns 6. Proximity to low density residential and recreational areas 7. Overall landscape design of the applicant's ro e includin � P P �' g topography 8. The nature and design of the message board supports BACKGROUND January 25, 1988: The city council adopted the p resent ordinance. October 24, 1995: The CDRB stated their support for the code change and asked staff to prepare an amendment. Previously Approved Ground Signs Between 16 and 32 Square F eet eet April 28, 1988: A 32- square -foot sign for the Lutheran eran Church of Peace October 24, 1989: A 32- square -foot sign for Arlington Hills Methodist Church November 28, 1989: A 22.5- square -foot sig for Holy Redeem ' g Y er Catholic Church Ma 22 19 y , 90. A 32- square -foot sign for the Salvation Arm Free Church y July. 9, 1 :991: A 3 _ 1 square _ foot sign for First Evangelical Free Church September 22, 1992: A 32- square -foot sign for Gethsemane Lutheran Church April 26, 1994: October 18, 1994: A 32- square -foot sign for the St. Pau ' .g I Hmong Alliance Church A 20- square -foot sign for St. Jerome's Catholic Church ch November 15 1994: _ _ A 32 square foot sign for Cross Lutheran Church October 24, 1995: A 32- square -foot G f sign or Great Hope Church g P October 24, 1995: A 32- square -foot sign for the Village on Woodl nn g y Town Homes DISCUSSION There are several reasons for changing this ordinance: 1. Since this code's adoption in 1988, the CDRB has never denied a request for a 32- square -foot sign. The eleven signs approved have always met the findings for approval. 2. 32 square feet is an appropriate- sized ground sign for a church, multiple dwelling or institution. So far, these signs have always been for large sites. 3. It costs an applicant $311 to apply for CDRB review. This is a large fee for innocuous proposals that have always been approved. 4. These reviews needlessly use staff and CDRB time as well as delay applicants from installing their signs. The only benefit of such a review by the CDRB is to evaluate a sign's appearance. So far, however, of the eleven signs approved, all have been found to be attractive by the CDRB without any alteration. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the ordinance amendment on page 3. p :ordlrl - signs. cod(5.4) Attachment: Ordinance Amendment 2 Attachment 1 ORDINANCE No. AN ORDINANCE REVISING THE SIGN REGULATIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS The Maplewood City Council approves the following ordinance:. (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Section 1. This section changes Section 36 -316 as follows: Section 36 -316. Permitted. The only signs which are permitted in an R -1 Residence District (Single Dwelling), R -2 Residence District (Double Dwelling) or R -3 Residence District (Multiple Dwelling) in the city are as follows: (1) Signs permitted in Schedule I, subdivision I of this division, as regulated therein. (2) One fascia sign of not more than two (2) square feet in area giving the name and occupation of the occupant of a building carrying on a home occupation as defined in the city zoning ordinance. (3) Wall signs up to twenty -four (24) square feet and freestanding signs up to thirty -two (32) #te square feet may be allowed by sign permit for apartment or townhouse complexes, churches, schools, libraries, community centers or any other institutions. *3d1ftAn Or :hAPO% 12:11 Me The total square footage of any freestanding sign G G8 FA shall measure the overall dimensions of the sign message board. One fascia and one freestanding sign shall be permitted for each street frontage. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after its approval and publication. Approved by the Maplewood City Council on , 199 . 3 • • , d" h1aael far. Wonfilinafian we • hu thia • ' • %W WWWV • • • i The total square footage of any freestanding sign G G8 FA shall measure the overall dimensions of the sign message board. One fascia and one freestanding sign shall be permitted for each street frontage. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after its approval and publication. Approved by the Maplewood City Council on , 199 . 3 1 -3 Act i On by C ©une i l 9, Endorsed.. ....�._ Mod if i ed.. -..q� Re j ecte MEMORANDUM Date TO: City Manager, Mike McGuire FROM: Community Develop e M elinda y p ent Der ctor, Me Inds Coleman SUBJECT: Lawn Irrigation Ordinance DATE: March 1, 1996 INTRODUCTION At a past city council meeting staff was asked to review the irrigation ordinance. There were three specific issues identified and they are as follows: 1) that the ordinance lacked the requirement that an irrigation system be installed in the ground, 2) that if such systems are designed to shut off automatically, that they also be equipped with a rain sensor to prevent operation when it is raining, and 3) to find out what the cost of sensing/ detecting equipment would cost. ANALYSIS The existing Ordinance requires that the developer of any project, Other than single or duplex dwellings, shall "install a lawn irrigation system that will not spray on public streets or sidewalks." The ordinance does not address whether or not irrigation systems are required of remodelling or expansion projects or of existing buildings that change uses. Staff generally looks at this on a case by case basis and with input from the desig review board. This is .one area where staff is looking for policy guidance from city council. Another area staff would like council consideration relates to how we define where yards should be irrigated. This too, is not addressed in the current ordinance. Staff surveyed landscape businesses to see what irrigation systems typically cost and what the cost of sensors would be. The total costs, including installation for a commercial in- ground sprinkling system are variable, ranging from 10 cent to 50 cents per square foot depending on the area, terrain and physical barriers. The cost of adding rain sensing equipment is minimal, usually around $100. Attached is a draft ordinance changing the lawn irrigation code for council review. At this time it only addresses the issues outlined in the introduction. The draft ordinance gives the city council the opportunity to grant exemptions if suitable landscaping or irrigation alternatives have been provided. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city council review this information and direct staff to prepare specific code changes. If there is direction to accept the proposed changes or others to the ordinance, staff will review them with the community design review board. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MAPLEWOOD CITY CODE SEC. 36 -28, SUBD. C, ARTICLE 9, PERTAINING TO LAWN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: SECTION 1. This section amends Sec. 36 -28, Subd. C, Article 9 as follows: (Additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out.) (9) Install a underground lawn irrigation system of . Th system shall spray on p blc streets or sidew -alks. If such irrigation system is automatic or is ca able of o. eratin automatically, the sha be equipped.with a rain sensor /detection device to prevent operation when it is so as ,to .conserve water. If installation of such system is prohibitively, difficult due to terrain or other factors, or is unnecessarydue to alternative irrigation provisions or xeriscape arrangements which do not require irrigation, exemption may, be granted by the City Council on a case-by-case basis, provided suitable alternative irri ation arras ements have been secured ,,by the develoiDer. SECT1'ON 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the City Council approves it and the official newspaper publishes it. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on , 1996, CAJERICSOMSPRINKLE ORD MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Parkview - Commercial Lot Zoning DATE: March 18, 1996 INTRODUCTION Project Description Action by Council:; Endorsed Modifie Rejecte Da,t e aim Good Value Homes is proposing to develop ots for 42 single-family P homes and three lots for commercial use. They call this development Parkview. It would be between Lower Afton Road and Londin Lane, west of Connemara ow ra Condominiums. Refer to the maps on pages 7 -10. Requests To build this project, Good Value Homes and Arnie Johnson, the property owner, requested that the city approve: . 1. Several changes to the comprehensive Ian. These included • p ed a change from. • R -3(M) and CO (commercial once) to R -1 (single dwellings) for the house lots in the preliminary plat. • R -3(M) to OS (open space) for the existing pond. • CO (commercial. office) to BGM (business commercial modified) for the future commercial lot on the south side of Lower Afton Road. • R -3(M) and CO to LBC (limited business commercial) for the future commercial lot on the east side of McKnight Road. See the approved land use map on page 7. 2. Several changes to the zoning map. These included a r • rezoning from. • F (farm residence) and CO (commercial once) to R -1 (single dwelling) for the house lots in the proposed plat. • CO (commercial office) to BGM (business commercial modified) for the future commercial lot on the south side of Lower Afton Road. • F and CO to LBC (limited business commercial ) for a 40-foot-wide ' . step of land west of the proposed house lots and for the future commercial lot on the east side of McKnight Road. Refer to the existing and proposed zoning maps on a • 10 a g p pages 8 and 9, the preliminary plat on page and the letters on pages 11 -13. The council approved the zone change for the house lots on March 11, 1996. However, the council still needs to take action on the zone change re uest for two ' g q o commercial lots. State law requires the city to take action on any zoning request within 60 days of the city receiving g a complete application or within 120 days if the city notifies the -applicant of the time extension. pp ension. In addition, the metropolitan land planning act requires citys to have the zonin g property of ro ert Y consistent with their land use plan. 3. A preliminary plat for 42 house lots, three commercial lots and an outlot around the existing pond. (See the map on page 10.) 4. A variation from the city code to reduce the required street width. Mr. Peterson wants to reduce the streets from 32 feet to 28 feet from gutter to gutter. BACKGROUND On July 10, 1995, the city council held a public hearing to review a request of Town and Country ry Homes to build 116 town houses on this site. At this meeting, council directed 9, staff to prepare findings of fact to deny the town house proposal. Can July 24, 1995, the council adopted findings of fact to den.. a zoning ma change, preliminary Y 9 p g i p ry plat and design plans for the proposed town house development on this site. On February 12, 1996, the council approved several requests to build a Holiday tationstore on the southeast comer of Lower Afto n and .McKnight Roads y . On March 11, 1996, the council approved several requests for the ro osed Parkview p p development. These included changes to the comprehensive a rezoning from F 9 (farm resden residence) to R -1 (single dwellings) for the house lots, a preliminary plat and a code variation for narrower streets. However, the council did not take action on changing the zoning for two commercial lots. DISCUSSION Zoning Map Changes - Commercial Lots The approved preliminary plat would have three commercial lots on Lower Afton and McKnight Roads. The corner lot is for the proposed • • g • p p Holiday Stationstore. In addition, there would be one lot east of the proposed Holiday site on Lower Afton Road and another lot south of the Holiday ite on McKnight Road. y Mr. Johnson is asking the city to plan and zone the two future commercial lots one on either side of the one proposed Holiday Stationstore) BC (business commercial). (Refer to his letter on a e 13. p g ) Mr. Johnson does not have any specific plans or developers yet for these lots. Maplewood has zoned these areas CO (commercial office) and LBC (limited business commercial). The requested BC designation is Maplewood's general commercial zone and allows a variety f commercial. uses. These include retail restaurants taurants, on -sale liquor, offices, clinics, banks, personal services, car sales, indoor theaters, bakeries, repair shops and indoor organized P 9 athletic activities. By conditional use permit, the council could allow laces of amusement ement, recreation or assembly, exterior storage, display or sales, used motor vehicle sales and motor fuel stations. 2 For the future commercial tot on Lower Afton Road (Lot 1, Block 1), city staff is recommending a change from CO (commercial office) to BC-M (business commercial modified). Maplewood intends the BC-M district to provide for the orderly transition between more intensive commercial uses and residential areas. The city allows retail uses, offices, clinics, day care centers, repair shops (except motorIfuel stations and vehicle repair garages) in this district. With a council - approved conditional use permit, sit -down style restaurants (no drive -up windows) and indoor places of amusement or recreation also could go here. The zoning code specifically prohibits drive -in: restaurants, exterior storage or sale of goods, car washes, repair garages and major motor fuel stations in the BC-M zone. As listed above, the possible uses in this location would be appropriate on Lower Afton Road and should be compatible with the proposed Holiday Station. For the future commercial lot on McKnight Road, (Lot 3, Block 1), city staff is recommending a change from CO to LBC (limited business commercial). This would expand the existing LBC zoning area along McKnight Road. This change would be to fit the proposed property lines for Lot 3, Block 1. The existing LBC area is about 33,600 square feet (0.7 acres). As proposed, Lot 3, Brock 1 would be about 1.6 acres. Most of the LBC area increase would be to the north into the existing CO (commercial office) area. This proposal would create one, larger LBC lot between the houses on McKnight Road and the proposed Holiday Stationstore. As proposed, the changes for Lot 3, Block 1 should provide more protection from commercial uses to the houses in the area. Maplewood intends the LBC zone to be a transition area between more intense commercial areas and residential areas. The zoning code only allows offices, clinics and day care centers in the LBC zone. The CO zoning district allows offices, clinics, banks, and related commercial uses including restaurants, pharmacies and retail sales to serve the primary office uses. In addition, the council could approve a conditional use permit for supportive commercial uses in the CO zone including gift stores, office supply, ticket agency, or travel service. Any of the uses in the LBC zone would provide a better transitional use between the houses on McKnight Road and the proposed Holiday Stationstore than those in the CO zone. All the proposed land use plan and zoning map changes would be consistent with city goals and objectives and the findings for approval required by the city code. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on pages 14 and 15. This resolution changes the zoning map from CO (commercial once) to BC-M (business commercial modified). This rezoning is for the proposed Lot 1, Block 1 of Parkviewfor the future commercial lot on the south side of Lower Afton Road. The city is approving this rezoning based on the findings required by code and to make the zoning consistent with the land use plan. B. Adopt the resolution on pages 16 and 17. This resolution changes the zoning map from F (farm residential) and CO (commercial office) to LBC (limited business commercial). This rezoning is for the proposed Lot 3, Block 1 of Parkview including a remnant strip of property east of the existing LBC-zoned land east of McKnight Road. The city is approving this rezoning based on the findings required by code and to make the zoning consistent with the land use plan. 3 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: gross acreage - 25.87 acres, proposed single- dwelling site - 14.6 acres Existing land use: Undeveloped (the city also has approved a Holiday Stationstore at the corner of Lower Afton and McKnight Roads) SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Lower Afton Road and Battle Creek Regional Park South: Londin Lane and McKnight townhomes (Nest: Single dwellings and undeveloped commercial property East: Connemara Condominiums and undeveloped property north of Connemara PAST ACTIONS July 1, 1971: The city council granted a special use permit over the entire 25.87 -acre site. The permit was for 375 apartment and town house units. This permit expired in 1972. October 10, 1983: The council rezoned the southeast comer of Lower Afton and McKnight Roads from F to CO. The council also approved a comprehensive plan change from RM (medium density residential) to LSC (limited service commercial) for this property. (LSC was the classification before the city began using zoning classifications in the comprehensive plan.) Early 1980s (specific date unknown): The city council rezoned part of the commercial site to LBC (limited business commercial) for a day care center. The owner never built this center. December 12, 1988: The council approved a conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) on this property. This PUD included a 33,600 - square -foot retail center with gas - dispensers at the southeast comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road and 152 town houses. The council also changed the land use plan from LSC to SC (service commercial). This CUP expired on June 1, 1991. March 14, 1995: The CDRB approved the design plans for the Holiday Stationstore. December 11, 1995: The city council held a public hearing about the proposed Holiday Stationstore. The council tabled this request to get more information on several subjects. January 22, 1996: The council again considered the requests to build the Holiday Stationstore. The council tabled the proposal to get more information about the proposed driveways. PLANNING Existing Land Use designations: R -1 (single dwellings), OS (open space), BGM (business commercial modified) and LBC (limited business commercial) 4 Existing Zoning: F (farm residence), CO (commercial office) and LBC (limited business commercial) Proposed Zoning: F (farm residence), R -1 (single dwellings), BC-M (business commercial modified) and LBC (limited business commercial) Findings for Rezoning Section 36 -485 of the zoni code requires that the city council make the following findings to rezon 9 ne property. 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially. injure or detract from the use of neig hboring � 9 g property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. q Y g 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the Logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers police p sewers, fire protection and schools. p:sec 121parkview.9 Attach ments: 1. Location Map 2. Approved Land Use Plan Map 3. Existing Property Line/Zoning Map 4. Proposed Property Line/Zoning Map 5. Preliminary Plat .6. 12 -27 -95 letter from Good Value Homes (rezoning) 7. 1 -26 -96 letter from Arnie Johnson 8. Rezoning Resolution (CO to BC -M) 9, Rezoning Resolution (F and CO to LBC) 5 � v 4, m CON � QT Z btAYER W. CREEK JAMES �� pR Q rn 68 � C R�.EK AL Ln RE� ►ot ' L*L o u � � � UPPER AFTON R0. � v 68 �� cR p � La+nw cr. s row cr. aoRLwo u+. 39 4 ooRLANo DR. LOWER 5 0 R0 d p PL. 7 UNO Cr. n, DORUWO CT. �� RAM$EY COUNTY I A&Jrl%lm I � � CORRECi701WL z 0 U 2 Ze C9 2 3 CT. o � BRIDGE DR. v � 16 HILLW OOD � Z o 1. HUNTINGTON CT. 68 d LJ 2 ' OR. 2. OAlCRIDGE LA. � �ti N�,L, g� SPR� Cr. � OR 3 0 UNWOOD AVE. @ p.hil AVE. UIyW 0 4� Z � �� CT. � 12 LOCATION MAP 6 Attachment 1 `� 12 Q N •,••,,• •. �u rAc:iu7Y 2 POND ,� W � �' 0'oAY O �. �O 3 � pptA = � bIAKY ' � t; lN. G � cb a � � � KINC AvE '� LN, e � O q >- � A4AIUW0 cc � G o a 25 O Q O o � � Q WdOD � I g w.a+r TEAK OD DR CT. o � BRIDGE DR. v � 16 HILLW OOD � Z o 1. HUNTINGTON CT. 68 d LJ 2 ' OR. 2. OAlCRIDGE LA. � �ti N�,L, g� SPR� Cr. � OR 3 0 UNWOOD AVE. @ p.hil AVE. UIyW 0 4� Z � �� CT. � 12 LOCATION MAP 6 Attachment 1 `� 12 Q N Attachment 2 Lower Afton BC L B C .y R- 1- Lond'in L lm Mailand m REVISED c� . a� c� 0 co E a .a �v 0 0 Linwood 1 i 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 a� c a� U CO = COMMERCIAL OFFICE LBC = LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL I I OS = OlPEN SPACE R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS 1 11 R -3(M) = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I f t R -3(H) = HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL VISTA HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN (APPROVED ON 3- 11 -96) 4 N 7 Attachment 3 RESERVED FOR 'PARK BATTLE CREEK PAR I 02 127 (o•45 1 LOWER AFTON ROAD o -- PROPOSED N D HOLIDAY STORE WOODE 0 C 0 LOW L A ND 94 � 3s x 24,67 cu. Mason NBC h N� Q Rl E5M T )'328 PR -- s e �7 - Ix 338 PR PARKVIEW PLAT SITE 330- a Goo co r ("s S _ 346 ==' CONNEMARA 358 ONN E `-� A, 2271 2299 G q o; 4 ' N l9 Ni- 10 __ . 1064.45' _ Q 1 0 2 2. 2• r r 3 r s �r � 7. fA 1 N) 1 J I 9Z i j� j o 40 MV ' 0 9�2 3 ��" C s 240 A )77 1 " 4 �...'...."' 93 33 - — —z� ? ; 20.82 zr e.4 t6 a 1 �1 !Togs" a,C„ 1 f tW FR In , 3� 1 NAT. J sl w L OUT LOT A C T 1lb% o 7 F = FARM RESIDENCE P o � w Ho t�gfS ASP 6 R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS (4 A N CO = COMMERCIAL OFFICE 1 L = BC LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL q -v / 3� 14 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 'Q (EXISTING) N �1 Attachment , 4 RESERVED FOR PARK BATTLE CREEK PARK �h w t MIMI LOWER AF TO N ROAD -- ---- -- ,o ----- --- 33 0.07 4 PROPOSED t 7 •45 ■ BC (OWNER PR OPOSAL) , __ 1 W OODEP 1 -- -._ �. E HOLIDAY B PROPO -� 346 STORE 1 CONNEMARA` M somm 0 L AN LOW A p 1 33 MENOMONEE*** go BC (OWNER PROPOSAL) LBC (STAFF PROPOSAL) E gMT � g �2) 328 � PROPOSED PARKVIEW PLAT SITE 0 338 33 0.07 GRO �o o i C .rS 5 ' -� 346 CONNEMARA` N C .33 fc V 2299 coNNE 358 2271 1 A 10 45 _ V I I ,.. -- Woolf 40 , �co cos _ 33 ��-• �.: 00 we 1T7 3�8 t ?�.q�� '� t�e.gi� �3 33 � - - --- -- 2�1a a i ,. �t01 T 1 tew�ie 'L'.K�• i2 " N on 0 N_ 2 3 , i - 04 t 366 s Uri � N , �. _ S T i A p U T LOT A Y 17 7. U6 8 7 4>L� i G 219.41611 — 1 IV -1 F = FARM RESIDENCE P� ' MCKNIG- TowhHomES f? IL o Co - oP - R -1 SINGLE DWELLINGS 6 2. 1 UTIL - '/- E�MT•�it ' 114 (4e - = C OFFICE � CO COMM C �. LBC = LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL • BC —M = BUSINESS COMMERCIAL MODIFIED , i ,� _ . 4 ww wa ■hfa■r�1/1 /\Aar \�f' — f1n/ L / LR%A — VVV§V 'v ell—VV VV eve eve e—a •von•- PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP (PROPOSED) 4 N y Attachment 5 PARKVIEW LOWER AFTON GAS diiov km or va SaT lzou rw ALTIMMAR VW-�- I t oo 2 CNN" uft OUTLOT A 4 - 9 A Cw R ES EDGE Cr 0*.e 925 • - 8 ,i j 9s 9/U *T-7LANDS ;5 OW j I& fee 0~. • m 2:7 or IGI W DEVELOPER PRROPOSED TRAIL A. Nr' AX 3 Vol • NO a b 12 STAFF PR.,( PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 10 S MOW of or Vic 00 f 14 or =W 12. •4 SITE DATA Z EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING (AREA) (AREA) OWNER CO 7.74 ACRES 0 ACRES ARNIE JOHNSON LBC 0.65 ACRES 1.62 ACRES 2290 LONDIN LANE F 16-52 ACRES 0.00 ACRES ST. PAU.' MN 55119 R2 0.00 ACRES 14.61 ACRES ROW LONDIN LANE 0.81 ACRES 0.81 ACRES LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ROW McKNIGHT 0 ACRES 0.03 ACRES RETAIL - 0 ACRES 3.74 ACRES The Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 Of Section 12. DEVELOPER OPEN SPACE 0 ACRES 4.88 ACRES Township 2& Ran 22. exc the swthsriy 450 feet Of the %latterly 250 feet thereof. and except the GOOD VALUE HOMES, INC. Northerly 362 feet and except t h e w 40 feet 9*45 EAST RIVER ROAD, SUITE 201 PROPOSED R ' ESIDENTIAL ZONING LOW DENSITY (R2) Rornse covnt Minnamoto 25 aefee more at COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 TOTAL ACRES 14.61 toss. is. District 57 Plot 01200 portal 04= PHONE: 755-9793 TOTAL LIVING UNITS 42 DENSITY 2.87 UNITS PER ACRE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL ZONING LOT 1 BLOCK 1 2.50 ACRES ENGINEER— SURVEYOR LOT 2L BLOCK 1 LOT 3 BLOCK 1 1.24 ACRES 1.62 ACRES PASSE ENGINEERING, INC. 9445 E. RIVER RD. SUITE 203 PROPOSED OPEN SPACE ZONING COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 PHONE: 755-6240 OUTLOT A 4.88 ACRES PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 10 December 27,, 1995 Mr. Ken Roberts Planner City of Maplewood 1830 E. Co. Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Parkview Dear Mr. Roberts, This application is. to request rezoning of the parcel described. in the attached application. The proposed rezoning involves 3 parcels per the attached exhibit. The largest area would be rezoned from Rural to Single Family Residential.' This request appears be a technical change intended to more accurately comply with the proposed land use. It is my understanding that single family homes could be constructed on the current zoning but it is the Cities preference to change the zoning more accurately describe the proposed use. The other two parcels are on Lower Afton Road and McKnight. The applicant would like to have both of these parcels. rezoned form Commercial Office to Business Commercial. S in e Family Impact: 1. Traffic The proposed single family use would be have less traffic impact than virtually any developed use. 9445 East River Road N.W. Minneapolis, MN 55433 • Phone 612.755 -9793 Fax 612 - 755 -6207 Minnesota Builder 1583 11 2. Safety -The development of the site would not result in any unsafe 3. Light and Open Space -The subdivision .would have adequate street lighting- The open space needs would meet by the County Park. 4. Overcrowding - The proposed land use would represent the lowest possible developed state density. .Overcrowding would not e an issue. 5. Property Values -The single family homes .being proposed- would not reduce the value of neighboring properties. Skcerely C' jo .Peterson Presli ent 12 January 26, 1996 Ken Roberts City Planner City of Maplewood 1830 E Co. Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55105 . Y Re: Rezoning of 4 Acres at McKnight and Lower Afton Roads Dear Mr. Roberts: This letter is a simple request asking you to help me to develop my property so that it can be of more benefit to the people who are living in this area and to those future people who will find Maplewood to be an attractive place to live. Request: As shown on the attached map of the corner of Lower Afton Rd and McKnight Rd there - is one acre on the corner designated as a Holiday Station store. The adjacent property along McKnight and Lower Afton Roads is designated as LBC and CO. I am requesting that this zoning be changed to BC. This zoning will enable me to attract buyers to complete the development of my property as previous City Councils have requested. This zoning will be of benefit to all of the people who live in this area and in South Maplewood. Developers who have been interested in developing my property have stated that the possibility of a convenience shopping center in this location would increase the attractiveness of my property for homesites. This zoning will work in conjunction with the request for R1 zoning for the 15 acres to be developed by Good Value Homes. This zoning will provide the highest benefit to the City of Maplewood since there is no other feasible zoning for this corner property. in addition, this zoning to BC will indicate to a developer just what i have to sell, and will expedite getting this property an the tax roils. Please note that i do not have any specific development in mind at this time; My intention will be to sell the property to a developer. We know that these changes have to happen; My plea is to be proactive and to eliminate some of the divisiveness that has been generated by Connemara. Sincerely, c: Mark Nelson Holiday Companies P. O. Box 1224 4567 West 80th Street Minneapolis, MN 55440 John Pecchia Christoffel, Elliot &Albrecht 386 North Wabasha Street St. Paul, MN 55102 A. E. Johnson 2299 Londi n Lane St. Paul, MN 55119 PIN 12- 28 -22 -22 -000 John Peterson Good Value Homes 9445 East River Road Coon Rapids, 11IN 55433 13 .Attachment 7 Attachment .8 RESOLUTION: ZONING MAP CHANGE WHEREAS, Arnie Johnson applied for a change in the zoning map from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). WHEREAS, city staff proposed a zoning map change to BC-M (business commercial modified) for the site. WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property on the south side of Lower Afton Road, east of the proposed Holiday Stationstore (the proposed Lot 1, Block 1 of Parkview). The legal description is: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a cast iron monument found for the Northwest corner of said Section 12, thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 21 seconds East, an assumed bearing, with the West line of said Section 12, a distance of 362.00 feet; Thence North 88 degrees 15 minutes 57 seconds East with the South line of the North 362.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a .distance of 285.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING HEREIN; Thence continuing North 88 degrees 15 minutes 57 seconds East, a distance of 420.53 feet; Thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds East, a distance. of 265.08 feet; Thence South 88 degrees 15 minutes 57 seconds West 415.46 feet; Thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of 40.08 feet; Thence South 88 degrees 15 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 25.13 feet; Thence North 40 degrees 17 minutes 21 seconds West, a distance of 125.00 feet; Thence 88 degrees 15 minutes 57 seconds East, a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 21 seconds West, a distance of 100.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. containing 2.6111 acres of land area. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On February 20, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the change. 20 On March 11, 1996, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described city staff proposed change to the zoning map for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 14 3 The proposed change will serve the best interest and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, .efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, p olice and fire protection and schools. 5. The proposed change. would make the zoning consistent with the land use Tan. p The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on March , 1996. 15 4 Attachment 9 RESOLUTION: ZONING MAP CHANGE WHEREAS, Amie Johnson applied for a change in the zoning map from F (farm residential), CO (commercial office) and LBC (limited business commercial) to BC (business commercial). WHEREAS, city staff proposed a zoning map change to LBC (limited business commercial) for the site. WHEREAS, this change applies to the property north and northeast of 328 McKnight Road South. (the proposed .Lot 3, Block 1 of Parkview). The legal description is: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows; Commencing at a cast iron monument found for the Northwest comer of said Section 12, thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 21 seconds East, an assumed bearing, with the West line of said Section 12, a distance of 362.00 feet; Thence North 88 degrees 15 minutes 57 seconds East with the South line of the North 362.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 40.00 feet to the East line of the West 40 feet of said :Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; Thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 21 seconds East with the aforementioned East line, a distance of 245.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING herein; Thence North 88 degrees 15 minutes 57 seconds East, a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 21 seconds West, a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence North 88 degrees 15 minutes 57 seconds East, a distance of 150.13 feet; Thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 24 seconds East, a distance of 275.30 feet; Thence South 88 degrees 19 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 250.13 feet to said East line of the West 40 feet; Thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 26 seconds West with the aforementioned East line, a distance of 255.03 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING herein conta.inin 9 1.5337 acres of land- area. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On February 20, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the change. 2. On March 11, 1996, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described city staff proposed change to the zoning map for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 16 I The proposed change will serve the best interest and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and .fire protection and schools. 5. The proposed change would make the zoning consistent with the land use plan. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on March 17 ti AGENDA REPORT he aor. Endorsed To City Manager Michael McGui Modi ie '_..�..._ ...�. From: Di of Public Safety Kenneth V. Collins L lReJecte Subject: : Loi teri n Ordinance Second Rea Date J g g Date: March 4, 1996 At the February 19 City Council meeting, the second reading of the loitering ordinance was tabled so that some technical changes could be made at the Council's request. These changes were as follows: • In the premise definition section, remove "cafe" and put a comma after "parking lot." In Section 1, the word "annoy" was removed and, in its place, "disturb the peace was inserted. In Section 5, the word "private" was inserted before the word "roadway;" and the sentence "The provisions of the paragraph shall be applicable only along any street posted as a 'No Cruising Zone' and only between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 2 :00 a.m." was removed. This will be dealt with at a later date when the need arises. No other ch anges were made at this time. Recommendation Review and pass second reading of ordin Action Required Submit to City Council for review and handling. KVC:js Attachment §19 -16 MAPLEWOOD CODE Sec. 19-16. Same —Loitering. (a) Definitions. For the purpose of this section, the following terms shall have the following respective meanings ascribed to them: (l) Premise . any yard, lot, parcel, sidewalk, boulevard, street, highway, alley, park, playground, restaurant, church, school, any car or other motor vehicle, parking lot, drive -in, building used for business, commercial or industrial purposes, washroom, lavatory, apartment hallway, or other location whether public or private in the City of Maplewood. (2) Puniness premise - all premises, either public or private, which include a facility that has established open and closed hours. Non - business premises shall include all other premises in the City of Maplewood. (b) Whoever commits any of the following acts constitutes a nuisance against public order and is guilty of a petty misdemeanor: (1) Lingering about the doorway of any building, or sitting or lingering upon the steps, window sills, railing, fence, or parking area adjacent to any building in such manner so as to obstruct or partially obstruct ingress to or egress from such building or in such a manner to disturb the peace of the owner or occupant. (2) Remaining for more than five minutes -on any private business premise which is posted with a conspicuous sign containing the words "No loitering" when: (a) the business establishment is closed; or (b) the person charged does not visibly demonstrate any intent to conduct business at the establishment or to leave the premise after having conducted such business. State law reference -- M.S. § 609.725, subd 2. Cross References -- Mun Corp 111(1). NUISANCES §19.16 (3) Lingering for more than five minutes on any public business premise which is posted with a conspicuous sign containing the words "No loitering" when such premise neither has been nor will be open for business within 30 minutes. (4) Lingering for more than five minutes on any public or private non - business premise which is posted with a conspicuous sign containing the words "No loitering." (S) Lingering for any length of time upon any public or private premises or moving in a slow and deliberate manner without purpose or otherwise interfering with, obstructing, or rendering difficult or unreasonable for passage any public or private roadway, sidewalk, parking area, or right -of -way after having been warned within the preceding four months, either orally or in writing, by the owner, agent, manager or person in charge thereof, or by any peace officer or employee of the City of Maplewood, that such conduct will result in a charge under this section. (c) Whoever commits any of the following acts is guilty of a misdemeanor: (1) Failing or refusing to vacate or leave any premises after being requested or ordered, either orally or in writing, to do so by the owner:, agent, manager, or person in charge thereof, or by any peace officer or employee of the City of Maplewood, or returning within two hours thereafter to the premises after having been so requested or ordered to vacate such premises. • (2) Any of the acts described in subsection 19 -16 (b) (1) through (5), when less than one year has elapsed since the individual was found guilty of a previous violation of this section. x - (v MEMORANDUM Act by Counci TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City Manager City Clerk HISTORICAL ADVISORY COMMISSION March 18 1996 Endorse Modifi� ReJec Date Attached for first reading and discussion is the proposed Ordinance creating the Maplewood Historical Society. ORDINANCE FOR MAPLEWOOD HISTORICAL ADVISORY COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREIN ORDAIN: Article IV, Secs. 2 -87 to 2 -97 is hereby added to read as follows: DIVISION 4. HISTORICAL ADVISORY COMMISSION Sec. 2 -87 Established There is hereby established for the City a Historical Advisory Commission as an independent board to the City Council, as provided in Minnesota Statutes Annotated Sections 471.93 and 138.51. Sec. 2 -88. Statement of public policy and purpose. It is hereby declared by the City Council that it is the public policy of the City to engage in a comprehensive program of historic preservation and to promote the use and conservation of historic properties for the education, inspiration, pleasure, and enrichment of the citizens of this City. The purpose of this division creating the Historical Advisory Commission is to secure for all citizens the opportunity to preserve and disseminate knowledge of the City's history. Sec. 2 -89. Advisory body: All actions of the Historical Advisory Commission shall be in the nature of recommendations to the City Council, and said Commission shall have no final authority with reference to any matters, except as the Council may lawfully delegate authority to it. Sec. 2 -90. Composition; Appointment; Qualifications; Terms (a) The Historical Advisory Commission shall be composed of 7 members appointed by the City Council, who shall be residents of the City, may not hold an elective public office in the City, and shall be selected to assure that the Commission is representative of the various areas of the City and responsive to the needs of the people. The unexpired portion of the year in which the appointments are made shall be considered as one year. All terms shall expire on December 31 of the year in which the appointment terminates. As the terms expire, all appointments thereafter shall be for a term of 3 years, and a member may only be reappointed for one additional terms. The first board appointed by the Council shall serve as follows: three members for three years and four members for two - year terms. After the two -year terms expire, all appointments shall be three -year appointments. Sec. 2 -91. Officers Generally. The chairperson and vice - chairperson of the Historical Advisory Commission shall be elected by the Historical Advisory Commission at the first meeting in January of each year from among the members of the Historical Advisory Commission. The chairperson shall be responsible for calling and presiding over all meetings and shall be entitled to an equal vote with other members of the Commission. 1 ADDITION TO ITEM I -E MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City Clerk SUBJECT: HISTORICAL ADVISORY COMMISSION DATE: March 22, 1996 As requested, following are the changes to the proposed ordinance which were .suggested by Councilmember Rossbach: (Suggested deleti crossed out, suggested additions underlined.) * At the end of Sec. 2 -88. Statement of public policy and purpose: The purpose of this division creating the Historical Advisory Commission is to secure for all citizens the opportunity to preserve and disseminate knowledge of the area's history. * Additional paragraph added to Sec. 2 -89. Advisory body: The Historical Advisory Commission shall act as the board of director's for a Maplewood Area Histori Society, which w i l l act as a communi organi zati on , encouraging unlimited membersh. p and g art.ici ation of all interested perso ns. Peo 1e chosen by this or anization.shalI com rise the Historical Advisor Commission at. specified interval s with the app roval of the Council. This rou 's operati on wi 11 be as outl i ned i n the . sp dfi c charter. Wording change in first sentence plus additional sentence at the end of Sec. 2 -90. Composition; Appointment; Qualifications; Terms .(a) The Historical Advisory Commission shall be composed of 7 members ap . pol nted by the Ci ty Counci 1, who shal 1 be resi dents of the Ci ty, may not hol d an elective public office in the City, and shall be selected to assure that the Commission is representative of the City and responsive to the needs of the people. . . . Generally, the.four officers of the Maplewood Area Historical Societylus three at -1 ge members will be the appointed members. * Wording change in first sentence of Sec. 2 -91. Officers Generally. The chairperson and vice- chairperson of the Historical Advisory Commission :shall be elected by the Historical Advisory Commission at the , rte- �inrlin January meeti of each year from among the members of the Historical Advisory Commission. Sec. 2 -95. Compensation, expenses. All members of the Historical Advisory Commission shall serve without compensation. However, the City Council may appropriate money for the purpose of collecting, preserving, storing, housing, printing, publishing, distributing and exhibiting data and material pertaining to the history of the City, for the purpose of commemorating the anniversary of any important and outstanding event in such history, and to preserve such history, data and material for future generations. Sec. 2 -96. Staff - Director of Commission responsible for correspondence, docket, minutes, records, files, etc. Subject to the direction of the Historical Advisory Commission and its chairperson, the City Manager's designated person shall conduct all correspondence of the Commission, send out all notices required, attend all meetings and hearings of the Commission, keep the docket and minutes of the Commission's proceedings, compile all required records, and maintain the necessary files and indexes of the Commission. Sec. 2 -97. City Attorney and Other City Employees. (a) The services of the City Attorney shall be available to the Historical Advisory Commission. 3 Sec. 2 -92. Vacancies. (a) Any of the following may cause the office of a Historical Advisory Commissioner to become vacated: (1) Death or removal from the City; (2) Disability or failure to serve, as shown by failure to attend four (4) meetings in any year, may be cause for removal by the Council majority, unless good cause can be shown to the Council. (3) Resignation in writing. (4) Taking of public office in the City. Sec. 2 -92. Officers, Meetings, Rules of Procedure; Public Attendance; etc. (a) The Historical Advisory Commission shall establish meeting times and adopt its own Rules of Procedure to be reviewed and approved by the City Council. (b) All meetings of this Commission shall be open to the public and shall be housed in such manner as to permit public attendance. Sec. 1.93. Powers. The powers of the Historical Advisory Commission shall be as follows: (1) Recommend districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that are of historical, archeological, engineering or cultural significance. No power shall be exercised by the Commission which is contrary to a State law or denied by the City by its charter or law. The powers of the Commission shall be exercised only in a manner prescribed by ordinance and no action of a Commission shall contravene any provision of the City's zoning or planning ordinance unless expressly authorized by an ordinance. Sec. 2 -94. Duties and Responsibilities. The duties of the Historical Advisory Commission shall be as follows: (1) To discover and collect any and all material which may establish or illustrate the history of the City. (2) The Commission may publish any and all materials which may bear upon this history. (3) To provide for the guidelines for any and all material necessar y to fulfill its purpose. (4) To disseminate historical information by any means it deems advisable, including the operation of a museum. A museum for these purposes follows the International Council of Museums (ICOM) definition. A museum is a "non- profit making, permanent institution in the service of society and its development, and open to the public, which acquires, conserves, researches, communicates, and exhibits, for the purpose of study, education, and enjoyment, material evidence of people and their environment." (5) To apply for and receive any grants, accept bequests and to establish and maintain an endowment fund. 2 AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Mayor and City Council Michael McGuire, City Manager Action by Council: End.orsea Igo dif i ed..._..._ Rejected... Date SET MEETING TO DISCUSS COMMERCIAL PROPERTY STUDY March 15, 1996 INTRODUCTION At the March 4, 1996 Council /Manager workshop, the Council decided to consider the Commercial Property Study as the sole item on the agenda for a future meeting. The Council would need to set and post a notice of this special meeting. For convenience, this meeting could be held immediately following a pre - agenda meeting, beginning no later than 5:30 p.m. and ending at 7 p.m. There is also a fifth Monday in April that is available. The following dates are suggested: Thursday, April 4 Immediately following 4:30 p.m. pre - agenda meeting Monday, April 29 5 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. Thursday, May 9 Immediately following 4:30 p.m. pre - agenda meeting RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council set a special meeting to discuss the Commercial Property Study from one of the dates listed above. AGENDA NO. V " I AGENDA REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager RE: Park- and -Ride Lot, Highway 61 and County Road C DATE: March 25, 1996 Action by Couno11 Modif ed Re j ec ted., Date INTRODUCTION This item was placed on the agenda at the Council meeting on March 11, and continued to the March 25 Council meeting. Since the Council authorized changes in the posted no- parking areas around this site on February 12, several residents and users of the lot have contacted the City and shared their enerall (g y negative) comments about the new parking arrangement. A map showing the current parking restrictions around the park -and -ride lot is attached. Discussion about options should occur at the Council meeting. Staff will make further changes as directed by Council. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council identify changes to make concerning parking restrictions in the area of the park - and -ride lot at Highway 61 and County Road C. �o Gervis L1.� Lake I PLAZA CIR 2 ALV►RADO DR 3 BELLECREST DR -00 4 DEAUVILLE DR 5 MERIDIAN DR PARK & R LOT �„ 20 �� G � . 30 J o B EAM AVE. �9 � S w k �tiC�t.{ o cT D ,, O o� �� Kohlman Lake KOF / �;` COUNTY ROAD c OPP"' Kelier Lake U) C) a: F - LARK z Q N U) U) S �<< rop PALM KohiPork an XX C7- --0 1p " t'L o I co. RD. (f) LLj 3 Q ``' c o c:) CONNOR C E . Q a CON� NO o LELAND CT. DEMWAj C-0 L AVE* z a 0 BROOKS � � Y t� JUNCTION � L-L �F� GERVAIS T. H .6 3 6 60 OPP"' Kelier Lake U) C) a: F - LARK z Q OP CTS U) U) � > v VIKING DR. ; co. RD. �� Q ``' o c:) LAURIE CT. Q a o LELAND RD. C-0 L z a � � Y Q JUNCTION AVE. L-L BURKE CT. <) CL J 83 U 7RK E, AV plecret P a o rk eU RK CHAMBERS ST � E �,"'�� ELDRIDGE AV m _�Q. a�'�' ;pl view Memo �No PA2K�NG� � Y% S . B. T H 61 TELEPHONE c 65 1 19' L ±7 T P Typ ld 97.5 1 0 �- 19 5 ` �'� 6US SHELTER N. B. T H. 61 t jt NO FA;2K-1tJG w FR. RD. Alo DI O taw k A AG ENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer Action by Council: Endo rs e d .... .......�........ Modified.. Re j ec ted.... Dat e SUBJECT: East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization g 9 DATE: March 18, 1996 In the early 1980s the legislature, through the state statutes, required watershed management organizations be established to cover the metropolitan area. As e . p result of that legislation the City of Maplewood participates in four watershed management g organizations. The west side of town is covered b the Central Ramsey Watershed Y y M Organization (WMO), the majority of the city s covered b the Ramsey-Washington Y Y Metro Watershed District, the northeast corner of town is covered b the Valle Branch Y Y Watershed District, and the very southern tip of the "leg" is involved in the East Mississippi WMO. The three organizations on the north part of town have done a ood job in complying g the law over the years. In fact, the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District has gone far beyond the legal requirements and is considered a leader in watershed management. The East Mississippi WMO, however, has had a less than sterlin record. The cities involved in this organization are Maplewood, St. Paul Park, Newport Grey Cloud Island, Cottage Grove, and Woodbury. Over the years this organization originally organized through a joint- powers agreement (JPA), has lacked leadershi p to implement the requirements of the statutes. Maplewood has never taken an active role in this organization because we comprise a very small portion of the area. There is virtually no activity in that part of our city covered by the WMO. Recently, under threat of enforcement action, the cities have begun to discuss their situation and investigate the most reasonable way to comply with the statutes. The first question that must be answered is how should the WMO be organized. There are two options available. The first is to organize under a watershed district format. The elements of this type of organization are defined by state statute. The Ramsey- Washington. Metro Watershed District is organized under this option. The district is governed by a board of commissioners appointed by the county. The board does have a responsibility to comply with the law providing the necessary reports and p ublic meetings to manage the water resources within the district. The district does have some limited levy authority, again based on statute. The also have the ' They ability to levy East Mississippi WMO 2 March 18, 1996 special assessments to finance improvement projects. They are indeed a se crate local unit of government created by the legislature with specific intent of managing p g g water resources within their jurisdiction. The second type of organization available is to continue under an amended nded powers agreement between the member cities. This type of organization also has a . . p g board. The appointments, however, are made by the member cities not the count � Y The organization would have the authority that any of the member.cities has the authority to accomplish. In this case anything he city can do the joint-powers g Y organization can also do. For the .past 11 years the East Mississippi WMO has operated joint-powers pp p as a organization. The best of my knowledge none of the member cities have taken leadership role in advancing the interests of water management or complying ' g plyingwith the law. Given the track record I have some reservations in recommending he City of joint-powers g Y Maplewood continue. to support the type arrangement for this WMO. Again, based on the track record, a watershed district organization would be 9 much more effective in responding to water management concerns and complying with legal g requirements defined by statute. In an effort to move this rocess along, of the member cities ' p g� r sties in the East Mississippi WMO are attempting to get a preliminary commitment from the city councils . Y to support the type of organization to be pursued. It is recommended that the City of . Y Maplewood endorse the watershed - district type of operation to represent the East p Mississippi Watershed Management Organization. KGH jc AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council Endorsed. TO: City Manager Modifi e Rejected. FROM: Assistant City Engineer D a te SUBJECT: Project 95 -18, Bellaire Avenue Street and Utilit Improvements DATE: March 18,'1996 Attached is a resolution approving the lans and authorizing the advertisement ' p g rtisement of bids. Also attached is a resolution for no parking on the west side of Bellaire Avenue. Staff will present the plans ands specifications for the street improvement ' p p meat pro }ect at the March 25, 1996, council meeting. The consultant has designed the ro'ect according to the council's p } 9 approval of the feasibility study and direction at the public hearin 9 proposed p . The ro osed ro} 'ect would be const improvements in conjunction with the City of North St. Paul. The im rovements within .Maplewood include the following: construction of a 36 -foot wide 9 -ton street with curb and gutter, replacement of the existing catch basins and storm sewer, . 9 ,replacement of a portion of North St. Paul's water main, and replacement of three existing sanitary sewer 9 y services. A cross - sectional view of the street design has been attached. The street design width will allow for on- street bicycle/pedestrian traffic wi ' ' without requiring a sidewalk or pathway. If the plans and specifications are approved b the council the ' pp y advertising for bids would be handled by the City of North St. Paul and the consultant after North St. Paul's approval. There would be very little cost to Ma lewood to have the project o to ' p p 1 g bid. The bids would be brought back to council for their acceptance. The no- parking resolution is required for the release of municipal state q p t aid funds for said project. Staff recommends the city council's approval of the plans and specifications Pp p p and the no parking resolution, as well as authorization for the advertising for bids. RAM jC Attachments E , RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on March 11 1996, plans and specifications for Bellaire Avenue Street and Utility Improvements, . Y p nts, Project 95 -18, have been prepared by for under the direction of the city engineer, � Y g , who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval, and pp , WHEREAS, the City of North Saint Paul and the City f Maplewood Y p d have into nto a point- powers agreement for the preparation of said plans and . p specifications, and WHEREAS, the City of North Saint Paul requested its consulting engineers, q g ngineers, Toltz King, • Duvall, Anderson nand Associates, to prepare said final plans and specifications NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans ands specifications, a co of which are attached p , copy ached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered laced on file in the office . p ffice of the city clerk. 2. Upon the approval of said lans and specifications b the ' p p y City of North Said Paul and the advertisement for and opening of bids in accordance with Minnesota Statues Chapter 429, the city clerk and city engineer shall receive the opened bids from North Saint Paul. 3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and i g Y instructed to tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids , and the award of a contract, at the regular city council meeting of July 22, 1996. NO PARKING RESTRICTION PROJECT 95 -18 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has approved the plans andspecifications P for the construction of Bellaire Avenue from Beam Avenue to Lydia Avenue and WHEREAS, the city will be expended municipal state aid (MSA - p p Project 138 126- . 02) funds on the improvement of said street; and WHEREAS, said - improvement does not conform to the approved ' ppr ved minimum width standard with unrestricted parking; and WHEREAS, release of MSA funds is dependent on specified parking P p p ng restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood prohibits the parking of motor vehicles on the west side of Bellaire Avenue from Beam Avenue to Lydia Avenue. 1O' i Pao•