HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996 02-12 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, February 12, 1996
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 96 -03
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting 96 -02, (January 22,. 1996)
2. Minutes of Joint Council /Boards /Commission Meeting of Februar y 3, 1996
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
EA. PRESENTATIONS
F. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are d id
consere to be routine b th
. ° . y e City
Council
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these
e
items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will
•- be
removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered . se aratel
P y
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Approval of Claims
Conditional Use Permit Review - Countryside Volkswagen, 1180 Highway 36 East
Preliminary lat g y
y Time Extension - Knollwood Circle Addition (Goff Homes)
East County Line Fire Department /Oakdale Ambulance Dispatching Contract
St p g
State Gambling License Renewal - Church of St. Jerome
Park & Recreation Commission Annual Report
Community Design Review Board - Change to Rules of Procedure
Budget Transfer - Recycling Fund
Carryover of 1995 Appropriations to 1996
Transfers From Tax Increment Fund
B udget Changes - - For _Tax - I ncrement Financing of Carefree Cottages - Phase 1
Transfers To Close Debt Service Funds 317 and 319
Joint Powers Purchasing Agreement With The City of St. Paul
Revisions to Pay Ranges
Century Avenue North of Highwood Sanitary ewer, Project Fe asib i lity
y � easibility
Memorandum of Understanding, Ramsey /Washington Metro Watershed District
• •
Study
1996 Community Development Block Grant Application - Handica p Access, Motor Vehicle
Department, City Hall
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M.:
2. 7:20 P.M.:
Lexus Automobile Dealership (Highway 61 North)
Wetland Setback Variance
Conditional Use Permit
Design Approval
Adult Use Ordinance (First Reading)
H. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Maplewood -In- Motion Bid for 1996
2. Purchase of Marked Patrol Vehicles
3. 72" Rotary Mower
4. Pick Up Truck
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Presentation of Community Survey Results
2. Holiday StationStore (Lower Afton and McKnight Roads)
Land Use Plan Change (CO to BC)
Zoning Map Change (CO to BC)
Code Change (Minor Motor Fuel Stations)
Conditional Use Permit
3. Organized Collection
4. Driveway Ordinance (2nd Reading)
5. Park -N -Ride
6. July 4th Celebration /Fireworks
7. Appointments to Joint Ice Arena Board
8. Loitering Ordinance - Second Reading
J. NEW BUSINESS
1, TH61 Watermain, Project 95 -17: Approve Plans and Specifications & Authorize Bidding
. ewoo Nature en er u oor Entrance Redesign
3. VEM Budget Adjustment - Mowing Equipment
4. Fire Relief Association Deficit
5. Energy Audit Report
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
N. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF MIAPLEWOOD CITY COUNC I L
7:00 P.M., Monday, January 22, 1996
Council Chambers, Municipal, Building
Meeting No. 96 0 02
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7 :00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian.
Be PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C R
Gary W.. Bastian, Mayor Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present
Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen., Councilmember Present
George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Mi nutes of ,Counci l /Manager Meeting of January 4, 1996
Councilmember Carl moved to approve the minutes of Council/Mano�er
Meeting of January 4. 1996 as presented.
rrrrrrrrrr irrlilrll�rgrir�rnlrrnr�r��r�� rrrrrrrr�rlr4
Seconded by Councilmember Ko.ppen Ayes - all
2. Minutes of Meeting 96 -01, (January 8, 1996)
9
Counci l member Rossbach moved to approve the _ _mi nutes- ai ; ---Meeti ng No 96
(January 89, 1996) as__pre�- sented,
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach
Ayes - all
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
L1 Smoking Compliance Checks
L2 Mayor's Update.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes -all
1 1 -22 -96
EA. APPOINTwIENTS /PRESENTATIONS
NONE
F CONSENT AGENDA:
.
Counci l.member Carlson seconded_ by Counci lmembe Koppgn; ayes - all, to approve
the Consent Agenda,
,moved,
Items_ F1 th ru F9., as _ recommended.
is Approval of Claims
Approved the following claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
12,812.82
Checks #6029-#6031 Dated 12 -29 -95 for period 12- Dec.1995
$ 89,823.56
Checks #23381-#23456 Dated 1 -9 -96 for period 12- Dec.1995
83 549.12
Checks #6032-#6041 Dated 1 -2 -96 thru 1 -3 -96 for period 14- Jan.1996
$ 44,189.17
Checks #23379- #23453 Dated 1.9 -96 for period 14- Jan.1996
$ 103,320.69
Checks #6045-#6047 Dated 1 -4 -96 thru 1 -5 -96 for period 12- Dec.1995
$ 64,131.36
Checks #23465-423591 Dated 1 -16 -96 for period 12- Dec.1995
$ 256,368.63
Checks #6042-#6057 Dated .1-4-96 thru 1 -10 -96 for period 14- Jan.1996
61 230.17
Checks #23466 - #23592 Dated.1 -16 -96 for period 14- Jan.1996
715,335.52
Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL. :
$ 305
Payroll Checks Dated 1 -12 -96 -
$ 48 , 649.83
.
Payroll Deduction Checks #50039-#50052 Dated 1 -12 -96
y
$ 354
Total Payroll
$190699914.26
GRAND TOTAL
2. Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation (Gorbunow)
Authorized cancellation of a $493.40 ambulance bill for James Gorbunow.
3. Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation (Schultz)
Authorized cancellation of a $531.30 ambulance bill balance for Bill
Schultz.
4. Budget Adjustment for Sewage Treatment Costs
Authorized an appropriation of 549,440 be made from the Sewer Fund
unappropriated retained earnings to finance sewage treatment expenses for
195.
2 1 -22 -96
� 5. Conditional Use Permit Review - 2873 Highway 61 North (Maplewood Toyota)
Reviewed and approved for renewal the Conditional Use Permit for Maplewood
Toyota at 2873 Highway 61 North, The CUP will not be reviewed again unless
a problem arises.
6. Board of Adjustment - Dissolution
Authorized dissolution of the Board of Appeals.
7. Holiday Differential - Temporary /Seasonal Employees
Authorized establishment of a fit per flour differential for temporary and
seasonal employees who are required to work on New Year's Eve, New Year's
Day, Memorial Day, the 4th of July and the day after Thanksgiving.
8. Railroad Lease Buyout
Approved the following Resolution:
96 -01 -03
APPROVING LEASE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County,
Minnesota, has previously entered into lease agreements with the Chicago. and
Northwestern Transportation Company which call for annual lease payments for
utility crossings and railroad right -of -way encroachments.
WHEREAS, the Union Pacific Railroad Company, successor company of the
Chicago and Northwestern Transportation an
Com y, now wishes to amend the
lease agreement through a one -time buyout in ieu of annual lease payments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
That a one -time buyout fee in the amount of $5,.450.00,, leases 90227,
90252 and 90311 shall be amended to eliminate the annual lease payments and
the amendments are hereby approved for execution by the Mayor. and City
Clerk.
9. Non -Union Wage Adjustment
Authorized 3% general wage increases effective 1 -1 -96, 1 -1 -97 and 1 -1 -98 for
all non -union employees, except the new Fire Chief position, which will
receive 3% increases effective 1 -1 -97 and 1 -1 -98.
3 1 -22 -96
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M.(7:06 P.M.): Ismaili Muslim Community Church (1460 Skillman Avenue)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a
request from the Ismaili Muslim Community Church for approval to use the
former Ramsey County Library building at 1460 Skillman as a church.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Commissioner Will Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Val Davis, representing the Ismaili Church
f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
Land use Plan Change tl to C)
g. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
96 -01 -04
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE (L TO C)
WHEREAS, Ms. Val Davis (for the Ismaili Muslim Community Church) applied for a
change to the City's land use plan from L (library) to C (church).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property at 1460 Skillman Avenue.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 2, 1996. The City
staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to
the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at
the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning
Commission recommended that the City Council approve the plan amendment.
2. The City Council discussed the plan amendment on January 22, 1996. They
considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City
staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described
change for the following reasons:
1. A church would have less affect on neighborhood traffic than an office
building or the former library.
2. A church would be just as compatible as an office or
existing and planned land uses around this site.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
Ayes - all
library with the
e
4 1 -22 -96
Conditional Use Permit
he Counci l member Carl son i troduced� the fol l owi ng, Res 1 uti on and moved i is
adoptio
96 -01 -05
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CHURCH
WHEREAS, Ms. Val Davis (for the Ismaili Muslim Community Church) applied
for a conditional use permit to open a church.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1460 Skillman Avenue. The legal
. description is
Blocks 28 and 29, Gladstone Plat 2, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. on January 2, 1996, the Planning Commission recommended that the
City Council approve this permit,
2. The City Council held a public hearing on January 22, 1996. The City
staff published a notice in the paper and -sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the
hearing a chance to s peak and present written statements. The
Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City
staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
, described conditional use permit because
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and
operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and
Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the
surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials,
equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous,
hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person
or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor,
fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration,
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local
streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on
existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services,
including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public
facilities or services.
5 1 -22 -96
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and .incorporate the
site's natural and scenic features into the development design.
90 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans the City received on
.November 15, 1995. . The Director of Community Development may
approve minor changes. The City Council must approve a conditional
use permit revision for any expansion of the church building or
parking lot.
2. The building must be used for a church within one year of Council
approval or the permit shall end. The City Council may extend this
deadline for one year.
3. Fill any potholes in the parking lot and driveways (code
requirement).
4. Sweep and restripe the parking lot to current City Code
requirements.
50 Remove and clean up any junk or garbage on the property.
60 The church shall keep any outdoor trash or recycling containers in
a 100 percent opaque enclosure, as required by code. The design of
the enclosure shall be subject to staff approval.
7. Any outside remodeling shall be subject to the approval of the
Community Design Review Board and Building Official. Any inside
remodeling shall be subject to the approval of the Building Official
and the Fire Marshal.
8. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Street vacation (Barclay Street)
i Counci l.member Carlson introduced the following. Resolution and , moved its
adoption:
96 -01 -06
STREET VACATION - PORTION OF BARCLAY STREET RIGIT -OF -WAY
WHEREAS, Community Development Director applied for the vacation of the
following described street:
The Barclay Street right -of -way between the south right -of -way line
of Skillman Avenue and the south property line of Blocks 28 and 29,
Gladstone Plat 2 or the north property line of the DNR Gateway Trail
in Section 15, Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County Minnesota.
6 1 -22 -96
n
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
W
1. On January 2, 1996,- the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve this vacation.
20 On January 22, 1996, the City Council held a public hearing. The City
staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to
the abutting property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing
a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning
Commission.
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the
property will go to the following abutting properties:
Blocks 28 and 29, Gladstone Plat 2, Ramsey County, Minnesota
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
,described vacation for the following reasons:
10 It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build a street in this location.
3. The adjacent properties.have street access
4. The County has been using this right -of -way for a parking lot.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
20 7:15 P.M.(7:16 P.M.): AT &T Tower (1899 Clarence Street)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a
proposal to install a 150' -tall cellular telephone tower facility behind
the storage garage at 1899 Clarence Street.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Commissioner Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Boardmember Erickson presented the Community Design Review Board report.
f. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Peter Beck, representing AT &T
Ted Olson, AT &T wireless Services
g. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
7 1 -22 -96
P
Tower Moratorium Variance
h. Councilmember Kopp en introduced the following.Resolutio,n and moved its
adoption:
96 01 -07
MORATORIUM VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, AT &T Wireless Services applied for a variance from the
Moratorium Ordinance.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to 1899 Clarence Street The legal
description is:
Lots 2 -6, Lot 22 and the south 25 feet of Lot 23 in Block 6,
Gladstone.
WHEREAS, the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires, a moratorium against
the installation of any communications towers for one year, unless the
Council adopts new regulations sooner.
I. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to install a cellular telephone
tower contrary to the provisions of the Ordinance.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On January 16, 1996, the Planning Commission recommended that the
City Council approve this variance.
2. The City Council held a public hearing on January 22, 1996. City
staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to
the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council
gave everyone at the hearing an o portunity to speak and. present
written statements. The Counci also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above -
described variance for the following reasons:
1. The proposed AT &T monopole and building installation would be
compatible with the existing and proposed land uses and zoning.
2. 94% of the surrounding neighbors notified of this project voiced
no objection to this request.
3. The use would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance because of compatibility.
4. The proposed facility is needed to mprove servi
i ce to AT &T's
users based on their tower- spacing requirements.
5. The proposed monopole would not cause any radio or television
interference.
8 1 -22 -96
6. The proposed monopole would be designed by a qualified
structural engineer and is designed and warranted to withstand
substantial. direct wind, upward to 90 mile per hour, and
further, i`s designed to crumple into itself i f failure should
occur.
71. All setback .and building code requirements would be met
8. The facility has met with the approval of the Maplewood
Community Design Review Board
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach,
Carlson,. Koppen
Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember
Rossbach
Street vacation (Curve Street
i Councilmember Carlson moved to take no action on the street
vacation.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers
Carlson, Koppen, Rossbach
Nays - Councilmember Allenspach
Conditional Use Permit
j. Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution moved its
adoption:
96 - 01 - 08
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CELLULAR TELEPHONE TOWER
WHEREAS, AT &T Wireless Services applied for a conditional use permit to
install a 150 - foot -tall cellular telephone tower.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1899 Clarence Street. The legal
description is:
Lots 2 -6, Lot 22 and the south 25 feet of Lot 23 in Block 6,
Gladstone.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On January 16, 1996, the Planning Commission recommended that
the City Council approve this permit.
2. The City Council held a public hearing on January 22, 1996.
City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to
the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present
written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission.
9 1 -22 -96
C
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above -
described conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and
operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan
and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the exi sting or planned character of
the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials,
equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous,
hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any
person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke,
dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage., water run -
off, vibration, general _unsightliness, el ectri cal interference
or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local
streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access
on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and
services, including streets, police and fire protection,
drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks -.
.7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public
facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the
site's natural and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the
City. The Director of Community Development may approve minor
changes and enter into an agreement with AT &T to use public
right -of -way.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within
one year of Council approval or the permit shall become null and
void. The Council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The property owner shall dedicate a utility easement for storm
sewer purposes to the City of Maplewood over, under and across
the North 10.00 feet of the West 65.00 of Lot 2, Block 6,
GLADSTONE, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
W
10 1 -22 -96
5. The applicant, AT &T Wireless Services, understands that the City
PP
Y may enact an Ordinance regarding the placement, size and the
imposition of a franch-ise fee once the moratorium is over and
may subject the property to all valid franchises enacted by the
Ci ty.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes Counci 1 members AlIenspach,
Carlson, Koppen
Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember
Rossbach
a
Design Approval
k. Councilmember Koppen
2. Obtain the following City Council approvals:
a. A variance from Moratorium Ordinance.
b. A conditional ue permit.
c. The vacation of Curve Street west of Woodbury
Mechani cal 0 s property, or license agreement for use if
legally possible.
3. Before getting a building permit the applicant shall submit
revised building elevations, for staff approval, showing a hip
roof on the proposed equipment building. The color of the
building shall match, or be compatible with Woodbury
Mechani cal 's building.
4. Before getting a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall:
a. Remove and dispose of the round concrete culvert sections
behind the Woodbury Mechanical building and make sure the
site is cleaned up.
b. Relocate or remove the semi - trailer, truck and small
flat -bed trailer from the north side of the Woodbury
Mechanical building to allow access to AT &T's two
parking spaces.
c. Pave a driveway extension and two striped parking spaces
for this facility (code requirement.
5. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary
occupancy if:
a. The City determines that the work is not essential to
the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter
of credit for the required work. The amount shall be
150 of the cost of the unfinished work.
er
11 1 -22 -96
1. Repeat this review in one year if the City has not issued a
building permit for this project.
N
Al work shall follow the approved Tans. The Director of
6. PP P
Community Development may approve minor changes.
Carlson Ayes Ma
.:Seconded. by Councilmember Ca or Bastian, Council members
Y Mayor ach, Carlso Koppen
Nays Counci member Rossbach
COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND AT &T
FOR A RENTAL FEE FOR THE TOWER.
H. AWMD OF BIDS.
NONE
U,NFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Holida y StationStore (Lower Afton and McKnight Roads)
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report .
b . Director i�
Director of Commun Develop Coleman presented the specifics of the
report.
c y anyone Ma Bastian .asked if an one wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following were heard:
Gary Gonrud, Real Estate Attorney with Holiday
Mark Nelson, Holiday Companies
Emil Sturzinegger, Connemara Condominiums
Will Rossbach Maplewood Planning Commission
d. May Bastian moved to table until the February 12, 1996 meeting to
allow Holiday Companies to revise the placement of the ingress and
egress.
2. Shoreland Ordinance (2nd Reading)
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the
report.
12 1 -22 -96
c Counci 1 member Koppen introduced the _following- Ordinance and moved its
adoption:
ORDINANCE NO. 745
AN ORDINANCE REVISING ARTICLE IX, SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT
AND OTHER RELATED SECTIONS OF THE CODE
The Maplewood.City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
SECTION 1. This section changes Section 28 -76 as follows:
Sec. 28 -76. Individual sewage treatment systems -- Conformance to state standards.
The owner or developer must use the City sewer system where available. Where the City
Engineer decides that a municipal sewer is not available, any use producing.sewage
shall have an individual sewage treatment system. A sewage treatment system means a
septic tank and soil absorption system or other individual or cluster type sewage
treatment system. The City requires a permit to install or alter a sewage treatment
system. All individual sewage treatment systems must meet or exceed the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency's standards. These. standards are in the document titled
"Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Standards, Chapter 7080 ". The owner or builder
shall provide sufficient soil borings and percolation tests so the City can decide
a site.s.suitability for an individual sewage treatment system..
SECTION 2. This section adds a new Section 28 -78 as follows:
Sec. 28-78. Nonconforming i ndi vi dual sewage treatment systems.
(a) After December 31, 1995, the City shall not issue a building permit for a new
principal structure or for the addition of a bedroom or bathroom, unless any
nonconforming sewage treatment system on the property meets current standards. The
City shall not consider a sewage treatment system nonconforming if the only
deficiency is the setback of the sewage treatment system from the ordinary high water
level of a lake or creek.
(b) The owner of any nonconforming sewage treatment system the City determines
to be a public nuisance shall bring the system into conformance or stop using the
system within thirty (30) days of receiving written notice from the city.
SECTION 3. This section changes the following definitions in Section 30 -2 as follows:
Lot means a parcel of land described separately from other parcels of land by a
plat, metes and bounds, registered land survey, auditor's plat or other accepted
means_. The lot description must be recorded by Ramsey County.
Lot area means the area of a lot, excluding drainage easements, wetlands and land
below the ordinary high water mark of public waters.
Lot division means the division of a property by metes and bounds description.
Public waters means any waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103F.005
Subdivisions 15 and 16.
13 1 -22 -96
;.t
Subdi vi si on means . the separati on of an area, parcel or tract of 1 and i nto two or
more parcels, tracts, lots or long -term leasehold interests for sale, rent or lease,
except. those separations:
(a) Where all the resulting parcels, tracts, lots or interests will be twenty
(20) acres or larger and five hundred (500) feet in width for residential
uses and five (5) acres or larger for all other uses;
(b) Creating cemetery lots;
(c) Resulting from court orders.
Wetland means a surface water feature classified as a wetland in the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service Circular No. 39 (1971 edition) or Minnesota Rules
Part 8420.0110, Subd. 52.
SECTION 4. This section adds a new Subsection 30 -3(d) as follows:
(d),The City shall not approve a subdivision where the owner or developer would
later need a Variance to use the lots for their intended purpose.
'SECTION 5. This section changes Subsection 30 -50) as follows:
(a) Before dividing any tract of land into (4) or more lots, a subdivider shall
submit a preliminary plat application to the Director of Community Development. The
Director of Community Development shall determine the necessary application
requirements and state them on a written form to be made available to the public at
his or her office. These requirements shall apply to plats and lot divisions. The
Director may waive any requirements that do not apply to the proposed subdivision.
SECTION 6. This section adds a new Subpart 30- 8(e)(3) (Minimum subdivision design
standards - Easements) as follows:
(3). Wetland easements The City may require a wetland easement over and beyond a
wetland. The wetland easement shall prohibit any structures, mowing, cutting,
filling or dumping within the easement. The City shall decide the easement's size
based on information from the watershed district and the wetland's quality, the
amount and quality of surrounding habitat the site's building restraints. The
City may require a developer to place signs around the easement boundary. These
signs shall identify the easement's boundary and restrictions.
SECTION 7. This section adds a new Subpart 30- 8(f)(7) (Minimum subdivision design
standards-Lots) as follows:
(7) Lot areas. Minimum lot areas shall not include public waters, wetlands or
drainage easements for storm water ponds. Lots in a shoreland overlay district
must meet the shoreland regulations in Chapter 36, Article IX .
SECTION 8. This section deletes Subpart 30- 8(f)(10) (Minimum subdivision design
standards-Lots) as follows:
(la) - Reserved.
14 1 -22 -96
SECTION 9. This section adds a new. Subpart 30- 8(f)(13) (Minimum subdivision design
standards -Lots) as follows:
(13) Where the City Engineer decides that City sanitary sewer service is not
available, all new subdivided lots shall have usable space for an individual
sewage treatment system and additional usable space to add a second
drainfield.
SECTION 10. This section changes Section 30 -15(a) (Lot divisions) as follows:
(a) A lot division shall not result in the creation of more than three lots.
SECTION 11. This section changes Section 30 -15(d) (Lot Divisions) as follows:
(d) The City shall not approve more than three new lots from a parcel or tract
in any single calendar year.
SECTION 12. - This section adds a new Section 35 -5 as follows:
Sec. 35 -5. Water Quality Standards.
Any public or private supply of water for domestic purposes must meet or exceed
the water quality standards of the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency.
SECTION 13. This section changes Section 36 -1 as follows:
Sec. 36 -1. Short title and administration.
This chapter shall be known as "The Maplewood Zoning Ordinance." The Director of
Community Development shall administer this chapter.
SECTION 14. This section changes Section 36 -4 as follows:
Sec. 36 -4. Interpretation; controlling provisions.
The provisions of this chapter shall be interpreted to provide the minimum
.requirements for the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare.
Where any provision of this chapter conflicts with any other, the most restrcti -ve
requirement shall apply.
SECTION 15. This section adds and deletes the following definitions to Section 36 -6
(definitions):
Commercial use: A principal use of land or buildings for the sale, lease, rental
or trade of products..goods or services.
Building line: The line parallel to the street line at a distance therefrom equal
to the depth of the front yard required for the district in which the lot is located.
For a lot fronting on a public water, the building line shall include a line parallel
to the ordinary high water level at the required setback therefrom.
Deck: A horizontal, unenclosed platform with or without attached railings, seats,
trellises or other features that are attached or functionally related to a principal
use.
15 1 -22 -96
Dwellin site: A designated location for residential use, including temporary or
movable shelter, such as camping and recreational vehicle sites.
Dwell i ng uni t Any structure or porti on. of a structure that i s desi gned as short -
or, long -term living including motel units, hotel units or cabins.
Height of building: The vertical distance between a building's highest adjoining
ground level or ten feet above the building ts, lowest ground level, whichever is
lower, and the highest point of a flat roof or the average height of the highest
gable of.a pitched or hipped roof. Height of building shall not include chimneys,
spires, towers, roof -top mechanical equipment, elevator penthouses, tanks or similar
building projections.
Industrial use: The use of land or buildings to produce, manufacture, store or
transfer goods, products, commodities or other items
Lot: A parcel of land described separately from other parcels of land by a plat,
metes and bounds, registered land survey, auditor's plat or other accepted means.
Ramsey County must record the lot description.
Lot area: The area of a lot, excluding drainage easements, wetlands and land
below,the ordinary high water mark of public,waters.
Mining: The surface or subsurface removal of sand, gravel, rock, industrial
minerals, other nonmetallic minerals and peat not regulated under Minnesota Statutes.
Planned unit development (PUD): A type of development characterized by a unified
site design, with two (2) or more principal uses or structures. A PUD may include
town houses, apartments, multiple -use structures (such as an apartment with
commercial shops),- or similar projects. Residential PUD's must have at least five
dwelling units or dwelling sites.
. Residential planned unit development: A residential use that is nontransient, and
the primary focus of the development is not service- oriented. For example,
residential apartments, manufactured home parks, residential condominiums, town
houses, cooperatives, single - dwelling homes and multiple dwellings would meet this
definition
Semi-public use: The use of land by a private, nonprofit organization to provide
a public service that is ordinarily open to persons outside the regular constituency
of the organization.
Setback: The minimum horizontal distance between any part of a structure, sewage
treatment system or other facility and an ordinary high water level, sewage treatment
system, top of a bluff, property line or another structure. Setbacks shall not
include eaves, gutters, cornices, steps, chimneys or fireplaces projecting not more
than two feet from the principal structure.
Sewage treatment system: A septic tank and soil absorption system or other
individual or cluster -type sewage treatment system.
Structure: Any building or appurtenance constructed or built on the ground or
attached to the ground. This does not include aerial or underground utility lines,
such as sewer, electric, telephone, telegraph, gas lines, towers, poles or other
supporting facilities.
16 1 -22 -96
Subdivision: The separation of an area, parcel or tract of land into two or more
parcels, tracts, lots or long -term leasehold interests for sale, rent or lease,
except those separations:
(a) Where all the resulting parcels, tracts, lots or interests will be twenty
acres or larger and 500 feet in width for residential uses and five acres or
larger for all other uses;
(b) Creating cemetery lots;
(c) Resulting from court orders.
Variance: The same as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462.
SECTION 16. This section changes Section 36 -8 as follows:
Sec. 36 -8. Violations.
Any, violation of this article (including violations of conditions established
concerning variances or conditional use permits) shall be a misdemeanor and shall be
.punishable as defined by law. Violations of this article can occur whether the City
or state requires a permit for a regulated activity. Each day that any violation
continues is a separate violation.
SECTION 17. This section changes Subsection 36 -17(h) and adds a new Subsection 36-
17(i) as follows:
(h) A property owner or developer -may expand a nonconforming structure or parking
lot if the structure or parking lot meets the following conditions:
(1) - The zoning regulations permit the use.
(2). The expansion would meet the minimum setbacks required by this chapter
or the setbacks of the existing structure, whichever is less. The
expansion shall not exceed the maximum height required by this chapter
or the existing height, whichever is taller. To deviate from these
requirements, the City may approve a conditional use permit, subject to
the standards in the City Code.
(3) The minimum setback from the ordinary high water level in a shoreland
district would be at least the average setback of adjacent residential
structures or fifty (50) feet, whichever is greater.
(4) All portions of said structure would be on the applicant's property.
(5) Runoff from the overhang of the addition would not adversely affect an
adjacent property.
(i) The City shall allow construction on nonconforming lots that do not meet the lot
size, width, frontage or depth requirements if the lots meet the following
requirements:
(1) Since becoming substandard, the lots have always been in separate
ownership from abutting lands.
(2) The lots were of record in the county recorder's office on the date
of enactment of this article.
17 1 -22 -96
(3) There is no evidence that -the lots did not meet the official
controls in effect when the City approved the lots.
(4) Any sewage treatment system meets the requirements of this code.
(5) The zoning regulations would permit the use.
SECTION 18. This section adds a new Section 36 -18 as follows:
Sec. 36 -18. Variances.
The City may grant variances to the requirements of this chapter. All variances
must follow the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. The City may approve
administrative variances according to Article VI of this chapter.
SECTION 19. This section changes the title to Subsection 36 -438 and Subsection 36-
438(a) as follows:
Sec. 36 -438. Planned unit developments generally; purpose and intent,
requirements.
(a) A PUD may not be divided unless the density distribution approved in the PUD
is ensured.
SECTION 20. This section adds the following subsections to Section 36-438 (PUD"s):
(d) Cormnon open space. The developer shall provide deed restrictions, covenants,
easements, public dedication or other equally effective and permanent means to
preserve and maintain any common open space. The instruments must include, all the
following protection:
1. Except routine maintenance, the City must approve the alteration of any
vegetation or topography that is visible from a public water.
2. Prohibit the exterior storage of vehicles or other materials. Storage
shall not include routine vehicle parking or the temporary storage of
materials for an ongoing construction project.
3. If on a public water, prohibit the uncontrolled beaching of watercraft.
(e) Owners' association. All planned unit developments with common open space
must have an owners' association with the following features:
1. Each lot owner must be a member.
2. Each member must pay a pro rata share of the association's expenses, and
unpaid association assessments can become liens on units or sites.
3. Association assessments must be adjustable to adapt to changing
conditions.
4. The association must be responsible for insurance, taxes and maintenance
of all commonly -owned property and facilities.
(f) The City shall designate PUD's on the official Maplewood zoning map.
SECTION 21. This section replaces the wording in Article IX of Chapter 36 with the
following wording:
18 1 -22 -96
ARTICLE IX. MORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT
Sec. 36 -561. Authorization, purpose and.objectives.
r
(a) Authorization: State. Statutes. and regulations authorize Article IX. The
specific sources are Minnesota Statute's, Chapter 105 (Division of. Waters, Soils and
Minerals) Minnesota Regulations, Parts 6120,2500- 6120.3900 and Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462 (the planning and zoning enabling legislation)
(b) Purpose and objectives: The purpose of this article i.s to provide specific .
regulations to protect the City's shorelands. It is in the public's best interest to
provide for the wise subdivision, use and development of shorelands. To accomplish
this purpose, Article IX has the following- objectives:
(1) Protect, preserve and enhance the quality of surface waters.
(2) Protect the natural environment and visual appeal of shorelands.
(3) Protect the general health, safety and welfare,of City residents.
Sec. 36 -562. Definitions.
The following words shall have the following meanings:
Average lot area.: The average of the lot areas within a single development. All
lots must be divided together to be included in the average lot area. For a single
lot, the minimum allowable area, shall be no less than the average lot area
requirement.
Bluff: A topographic feature such as a hill, cliff or embankment having all of
the following characteristics (land with an average slope of less than 18 percent for
50 feet or more shall not be considered part of the bluff):
(1) Part or all of the feature is in a shoreland;
(2) The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level;
(3) The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more
above the ordinary high water level averages 30 percent or greater; and
(4) The slope must drain toward a public water.
Bluff impact zone: A bluff and land that is within twenty feet of the top of a
bluff.
Boathouse: A structure designed and used solely for the storage of boats or
boating equipment.
Comnissioner: The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources or his or
her representative.
Intensive vegetation clearing: The complete removal of trees or shrubs in a
specific patch, strip, row or block.
Nonpoint source pollutant: A contaminant that enters water by washing off the
lard or seeping into ground water, which alters the physical, .chemical or biological
properties of water or the discharge into water of any substance that may create a
nuisance or make such water detrimental or harm the public health, safety or welfare.
19 1 -22 -96
Ordinary high water level The boundary of public waters. For lakes, this
boundary shall be at an elevation delineating the highest water level that has
existed for a sufficient time to leave evidence upon the landscape. This.evidence is
commonly that i nt where the .,natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic
to p redominant y terrestrial. For creeks, the ordinary high water level shall be the
elevation of the.top of the bank of the channel.
Public waters: Any waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.37,
'Subdivisions 14 and 15.
Regional flood: A flood that represents the large floods known to have occurred
in Minnesota. Such a flood is characteristic of what a person can expect to occur
about once every one hundred (100) years.
Shore impact zone: The land between the ordinary high water level and a line
parallel to it at a setback of 50 percent of the structure setback.
Shoreland: Land that is within the shoreland overlay district on the City's
zoning maps.
Shoreline: The boundary of a public water.
Steep slope: Land having average slopes over twelve (12) percent, as measured
over horizontal distances of fifty (50) feet or more, that are not bluffs..
Surface water - oriented use: The use of land where access to and use of a lake is
an integral part of the normal use. Marinas, resorts and restaurants with transient
docking facilities are examples of such a use.
Toe of the bluff: The lower point of a fifty (50)-foot land segment with an
average slope exceeding eighteen (18) percent. ,
Top of the bluff: The higher point of a, fifty (50)-foot land segment with an
average slope exceeding eighteen (18) percent.
Urban runoff: Storm water that flows over land or through a manufactured drainage
system.
Water- oriented accessory structure: A small, above - ground building or other
improvement that the owner needs to locate closer to ublic waters than the normal
structure setback. Such a setback would be because of t e relationship of its use to
a surface water feature. Examples of such structures and facilities include
boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses or freestanding decks.
The definition of water - oriented accessory structures or facilities shall not include
stairways, fences, docks or retaining walls.
Wetland: A surface water feature as defined in Chapter 103g of State Statute (The
Weiland Conservation Act).
sec. 36 -563. Shoreland Overlay Districts.
(a) Maplewood hereby creates a shoreland overlay district, with its attendant
regulations, as part of the zoning ordinance. This district shall overlay existing
zoning districts, so that any parcel of land lying in the overlay district also shall
lie in one or more of the underlying zoning districts.
20 1 -22 -96
a
(b) Within the overlay district, the City shall permit all uses allowed by the
underlying zoning district(s), if the proposed uses meet the additional requirements
in this Article.
(c) Article IX shall only apply to the shoreland districts on the official zoning
maps. These maps shall be on file in the office of the Director of Community
Development. The City has classified the affected waters in Section 36 -565.
(d) The City staff may reduce the limits of a shoreland on the zoning map
whenever the commissioner decides that a public water has topographic divides that
are closer to the public water than the shoreland boundary on the zoning map.
Sec. 36 -564. Notifications to the commissioner.
(a) The City sha1T send public hearing notices for amendments, subdivisions,
plats, variances or conditional uses under this article to the commissioner. The City
shall mail such notices at least ten days before the hearings. Hearing notices about
subdivisions shall include copies of the subdivision.
(b) The City shall send a copy of approved amendments, subdivisions, variances
or conditional uses under this article to the commissioner. The City shall mail all
such approvals within ten days of final action. When the City approves a variance
after :the commissioner. has recommended denial, the notification of the approved
variance shall include the City Council's minutes of the public hearing.
Sec. 36 -565. Shoreland Classification System.
(.a) The City has classified its public waters based on the DNR's Protected Waters
Inventory Map. The City used the following classification criteria (percentages apply
only to the shoreland located, in the City):
(1) Class I waters are those that the DNR has designated general development
waters, and the City land use plan shows at least seventy -five (75)
percent of the shoreland for commercial or industrial use.
(2) Class II waters are those that the DNR has designated general
development waters, and do not qualify for Glass I status.
(3) Class III waters are those that the DNR has designated recreation
.development waters having:
a. At least sixty (60) percent of the shoreline in public ownership, or
b. At least fifty (50) percent of the shoreland in public ownership and
less than ten (10) percent of the shoreland remaining for
development, excluding public open space.
(4) Class IV waters are those that the DNR has designated recreation
development waters, and do not qualify for Class III status.
(5) Class V waters are those that the DNR has designated natural
environmental waters.
21 1 -22 -96
. (b) The
City has classified its lakes as
follows:
(1)
Cl ass. I. Waters
Publ i c Waters Inventory
I . D
3M Pond
62 -0017
Tanner's Lake
82 -0115
(2)
Class II Waters
Public Waters Inventory
I..D..#
Gervais Lake
62.0007
C3)
Class III Waters
P.. ubl_ c Wa, ters I nv_e,ntory
I*-Do #
Casey Lake
62 -0005
Keller Lake
62 -0010
Lake Phalen
62 -0013
Silver Lake
62 -0001
Spoon Lake
Wakefield Lake
62-0011
M
Class IV Waters
Public Waters Inventory
I.D. #
Garver Lake
82 -0166
Kohlman Lake
62 -0006
Oehrline's Lake
62 -0014
(5)
Class V Waters
Public Waters Inventory
I.D, #
Beaver Lake
62 -0016
Round Lake
62 -0012
(c) Ma P 1 ewood has classified its two creeks
as tributary streams. The
two creeks are
Battle Creek and Fish Creek,
Sec. 36 -566.
District development standards.
(a) Lot and
Building Standards. The following
lot and building standards shall apply
to commercial
developments and residential developments
with four. or fewer dwelling units
per building.
The City must approve developments
with more than four units
per building
as planned unit developments.
(1) Class I Waters.
a. development
1. Minimum building setback from
the OHWL (feet)
2. Minimum on -site sewage system
setback from OHWL (feet)
3. Maximum Impervious surface
area (percent)
With bonus (percent)*
With Sanitary Without Sanitary
Sewer Sewer
50 NA
NA NA
50 50
70 70
22 1 -22 -96
b. Single Dwelling
1.
Minimum lot width
Water frontage lots (feet)
75
NA
Other lots (feet)
75
NA
2.
Minimum building setback from
the OHWL (feet)
50
NA
30
Minimum on -site sewage system
setback from the OHWL (feet)
NA
NA
4.
Average lot area
Water frontage lots (square feet)
15,000
NA
Other lots (square feet)
10
NA
5.
Maximum impervious surface area
(percent)
30
NA
With bonus*
Water frontage lots (percent.)
40
NA
Other lots (percent)
50
NA
(2) Class
II and III Waters
a. Nonresidential development
1.
Minimum building setback from
the OHWL (feet)
50
75
20
Minimum water frontage (feet)
75
100
36
Minimum on -site sewage system
setback from the OHWL (feet)
NA
75
4.
Maximum impervious surface
area (percent)
40
40
With bonus*
Water frontage lots (percent)
50
Other lots (percent)
60
5.
Maximum building height (stories)
4
4
b. Single dwelling
1.
Minimum lot width
Water frontage lots (feet)
75
150
Other lots (feet)
75
100
2.
Minimum building setback from
the OHWL (feet)
50
75
3.
Minimum on -site sewage system
setback from the OHWL (feet)
NA
75
4.
Average lot area
Water frontage lots (square feet)
15,000
409000
Other lots (square feet)
10
20
23 1 -22 -96
5.
Maximum impervious surface area
.(percent)
30
30
With bonus*
Water frontage lots (percent)
40
40
Other lots (percent)
50
50
c. Two -unit dwellings
1.
Minimum building setback from
the OHWL (feet)
50
NA
2.
Minimum Tot width
135
NA
3.
Maximum impervious surface
area (percent)
40
NA
With bonus*
Water frontage lots (percent)
50
NA
Other lots (percent)
60
NA
4.
Average lot area
Water frontage lots (square feet)
26,000
NA
Other lots (square feet)
17
NA
d. Three -unit dwellings
1.
Minimum building setback from
the OHWL (feet)
50
NA
2.
Minimum lot width
Water frontage lots (feet)
195
NA
Other lots (feet)
190
NA
3.
Maximum impervious surface
area (percent)
40
NA
With bonus*
Water frontage lots (percent)
50
NA
Other lots (percent)
60
NA
4.
Average lot area
Water frontage lots (square feet)
38,000
NA
Other lots (square feet)
25
NA
e. Four -unit dwellings
1.
Minimum building setback from
the OHWL (feet)
50
NA
2.
Minimum lot width
Water - frontage lots (feet)
255
NA
Other lots (feet)
245
NA
3.
Maximum impervious surface
area (percent)
40
NA
With bonus*
Water frontage lots (percent).
50
NA
Other lots (percent)
60
NA
24 1 -22 -96
• 4.
Average lot area
Water frontage lots (square feet)
49,000
NA
Other lots (square feet)
32,500
NA
r (3) Class
IV and V waters
a. Nonresidential development
1.
Minimum building setback
from the OHWL (feet)
75
.100
2.
Minimum water frontage per
development (feet)
J5
-150
3.
Minimum on -site sewage system
setback from the OHWL (feet)
NA
75
4.
Maximum impervious surface
area (percent)
30
30
With bonus*
Water frontage lots (percent)
40
40
Other lots (percent)
50
50
5.
Maximum building height (stories)
4
4
b. _Single dwelling
1.
Minimum lot width (feet)
75
150
2.
Minimum building setback from
the OHWL (feet)
75
100
3.
Minimum on -site sewage system
setback from the OHWL (feet)
NA
75
4.
Average lot area
Water frontage lots (square feet)
20
40
Other lots (square feet)
15
40
5.
Maximum impervious surface
area (percent)
30
30
.With bonus*
Water frontage lots (percent)
40
40
Other lots (percent)
50
50
d. Two -snit dwellings
1.
Minimum building setback from
the OHWL (feet)
75
NA
20
Minimum lot width (feet)
135
NA
3,
Maximum impervious surface
area (percent)
40
NA
With bonus*
Water frontage lots (percent)
50
NA
Other lots (percent)
60
NA
25 1 -22 -96
4.
Average lot area
Water frontage lots (square feet)
26
NA
Other lots (square feet)
35
NA
e. Three
-unit dwellings
1.
Minimum building setback from
the OHWL (feet)
75
NA
20
Minimum lot width
Water frontage lots (feet)
195
NA
Other lots (feet).
190
NA
3.
Maximum impervious surface
area (percent)
40
NA
With bonus*
Water frontage lots (percent)
50
NA
Other lots (percent)
60
NA
4.
Average lot area
Water frontage lots (square feet)
50
NA
Other lots (square,feet)
38,000
NA
f.
Four -unit dwellings
1.
Minimum building setback from
the ONWL (feet)
75
NA
2.
Minimum lot width
Water frontage lots (feet)
255
NA
Other lots (feet)
245
NA
3.
Maximum impervious surface
area (percent)
40
NA
With bonus*
Water frontage lots (percent)
50
NA
Other lots (percent)
60
NA
4.
Average lot area
Water frontage lots (square feet)
65
NA
Other lots (square feet)
49
NA
- efQr to Subsection )(1 )(d) for requirements
to qualify for an impervious surface
area bonus.
(4) Lot
width and setback standards for creeks.
a.
The lot width standards for single, double dwellings, three -unit buildings and
four -unit buildings in shorelands next to
creeks
are as follows:
Unsewered Sewered
Single dwelling 100 75
Double dwelling 150 115
Three - unit building 200 150
Four -unit building 250 190
26 1 -22 -96
b. Structure and sewage system setbacks (in feet) from the ordinary high water level
of tributary streams.
Structures Sewage Treatment
Unsewered Sewered System
100 50 75
(b) Additional Special Provisions.
(1) Reduction in development standards.
a. The City shall reduce all appli p cable development standards by one public waters
classification where a shoreland roperty meets all of the following conditions:
19 A principal or major arterial roadway, as defined by the Maplewood Land Use
Plan, separates the property from any public waters.
2. The property does not drain directly to a public water.
3. The visual impact of the property from the lake surface is small.
(i.e., A property subject to Class III standards may be subject to Class II
standards.)
b. The City shall raise the maximum allowed building height to - forty -two (42) feet
from any street side for structures that would be at least eighty (80) percent
screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline of a public
water during the summer.
C. The minimum lot area requirements in Section 36- 566(a) shall not apply to
developments that meet all the following conditions:
1. The development is at least eighty (80) percent screened from view from at
least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline during the summer.
2. The development shall have no frontage or private docking facilities on a
public water.
3. The development meets the impervious surface area requirements.
d. Impervious_ surface area bonus..
1. The impervious surface area limits shall be determined using the total
developable area of a parcel (above the ordinary high water level and
suitable for development), exclusive of streets and sidewalks.
2. The developer or owner shall provide and maintain significant man -made
facilities for reducing storm water flow or the treatment of runoff for
nonpoint source water pollutants to qualify for an impervious surface area
bonus.
3. The City Engineer shall determine whether a proposed management practice(s)
is adequate to warrant a bonus. A bonus may range from one to twenty (20)
percent for nonwater frontage lots and from one to ten (10) percent for
water frontage properties, dependent upon the practice(s) proposed. The City
Engineer shall forward a copy of proposed bonuses to the DNR for their
comments.
27 1 -22 -96
(2) In addition to other standards in this chapter, double, three -unit and four -unit
dwellings on Natural Environment Lakes must meet the following standards:'
a. Each building must be set back at least 200 feet from the ordinary high water
level.
b. Watercraft docking facilities for each building must be consolidated in
one
location.
C. No more than 25 percent of a lake's shoreline can be in double, three -unit
or
four -unit dwelling developments.
(3) Lots used as controlled accesses to public waters or as recreation areas for use
by
owners of nonriparian lots must meet or exceed the following standards:
a. If docking, mooring or over -water storage of more than six (6) watercraft is
to
be allowed at a controlled access lot, then the width of the lot must
be
increased by the percent of the requirements for ri Tarian residential lots
for
each watercraft beyond six, consistent with the folowing table:
Controlled Access Lot Frontage Requirements
Ratio of lake size. Required increase
to shore length in frontage
(acres /mi (per-cent
Less than 100 25
100 -200 20
201 -300. 15
301 -400 10
Greater than 400 5
b. All owners of nonriparian lots in a subdivision who have riparian access rights on
an access lot must jointly own the access lot.
c. The owner shall record against the title of the affected properties covenants or
other equally effective legal instruments that specify which lot owners have
authority to use the access lot. The covenants must do the following:
1. Limit the allowed number of vehicle parking.
2. Limit the allowed number of watercraft that the owners moor, dock or store
over water. (This shall not include temporary docking.)
3. Require centralization of all common facilities and activities to lessen
topographic and vegetative alterations.
4. Require screening of all parking areas, storage buildings and other facilities
from. a .public water, assuming summer. conditions. Screening shall use
vegetation or topography as much as practical.
(c) Placement, design and height of structures.
(1> Structure placement: Where structures exist on the adjoining lots on both sides
of a proposed building site, the owner or builder may change the structure's
setbacks without a variance to meet the adjoining structures setbacks from the
ordinary high water level, if the proposed building site is not in a shore impact
zone or in a bluff impact Zone.
28 1 -22 -96
a. Regardless of a waterbody's classification, the owner or builder shall set
structures or facilities back at least thirty (30) feet from the top of a
bluff and fifty (50) feet from an unplatted cemetery.
b. There shall be no structures or accessory facilities, except stairways and
landings, within bluff impact zones.
C. Nonresidential uses without water - oriented needs shall not be on lots with
public water frontage unless one of the following conditions is met:
1. The use or structure has double the normal setback from the ordinary high
water level; or
2. The use or structure is largely screened from view from the water by
vegetation or topography, assuming summer conditions.
(2) Design Criteria for Structures.
a Floodplain regulations: Development must follow the City's floodplain
regulations (Article VIII of Chapter 36).
b. Water-oriented accessory structures: Each lot may have no more than one
water- oriented accessory structure not meeting the normal structure setback in
Section 36- 566(a) subject to the following conditions:
1. The maximum height shall not exceed ten feet, exclusive of safety rails.
However, detached decks shall not exceed eight feet above grade at any
point.
2. The maximum area shall not exceed 250 square feet. Except that on general
development and recreational development waterbodies, the maximum area of
water- oriented accessory structures used solely for watercraft storage
shall be 400 square feet (provided the maximum width of the structure is
twenty (20) feet as measured parallel to the shape of the shoreline).
These structures may include the storage of related boating and
water- oriented sporting equipment.
3. The setback from the ordinary high water level must be at least ten feet.
4. The owner or builder shall use vegetation (assuming summer conditions).,
topography, increased setbacks or color to reduce the visibility of the
structure from public waters or adjacent shorelands.
5. The owner may use the roof as a deck, but the owner or builder shall not
enclose, cover or use the roof for a storage area.
6. The owner or builder shall not design or use the structure or facility as
a dwelling or living space. The structure shall not contain sanitary
facilities or sewage treatment facilities.
C. Stairways, lifts and landings: Owners or contractors shall not grade bluffs
and steep slopes for the sole purpose of access to a public water, where
they can build or install stairways or lifts. Stairways and lifts must meet
the following design requirements:
1. Stairways and lifts must not exceed four feet in width on single dwelling
lots.
29 1 -22 -96
2. Landings for stairways and lifts on single - dwelling lots must not exceed
32 square feet in area.
3. Stairways, lifts or landings shall not have canopies or.roofs kr
4. Whenever practical, stairways, lifts or landings shall be in the most
visually inconspicuous part of a. lot, as viewed from a public water during
the summer. _
5. Ram p p .
Ramps lifts or. mobility paths for physically- handica ped persons are
allowed to get to shore areas, if the owner or bui der follows the
standards of Subparts 1 through 4 above, and the requirements of Minnesota
Regulations, Chapter 1340.
d. Steep Sloes: The City Engineer must evaluate the possible soil erosion
impacts and development visibility from public waters before issuing a permit
to construct sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures or other
improvements on steep slopes. When the City Engineer determines it necessary,
he or she shall attach conditions to permits. These conditions shall prevent
erosion and preserve vegetation that screens structures, vehicles or other
facilities as viewed from the surface. of public waters during the summer.
(3) Height of structures: Unless approved as.a planned unit development, the maximum
height of all structures in residential districts, except churches and
nonresidential agricultural structures, shall be 25 feet.
Sec. 36 -567. Shoreland alterations.
All alterations in shoreland areas shall be subject to the City's wetland and stream
protection and erosion control ordinances. In addition, the following shall apply:
(a) Vegetation alterations.
(1) This subsection on vegetation alterations does not apply to construction of the
following uses:
a. Structures and sewage treatment systems
b. Roads, ramps or parking areas
(2) Vegetation may be removed or altered subject . to the following standards:
a. There shall be no intensive vegetation clearing within the shore or bluff
impact zones or on steep slopes. For all other property, the City requires a
- conditional use permit to clear forest land that is visible from a public
water. Such a proposal requires an erosion control and sedimentation plan
approved by the City Engineer and based on the Ramsey County Soil and Water
Conservation District Erosion Control Manual.
b. The City shall allow limited cutting, pruning or trimming of trees or shrubs
in shore and bluff impact zones and on steep slopes. This cutting, pruning or
trimming shall be limited to providing a view of the water from the site of a
dwelling or to allow for the placement of stairways and landings, picnic
areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas or water - oriented
accessory structures or facilities. Such limited clearing is subject to the
following conditions:
30 1 -22 -96
1. Such work not significantly reducing the screening of structures, vehicles
or other facilities as viewed from the water during the summer.
2. Preserving the shading of water surfaces along rivers.
3. The above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs or
branches that are dead, diseased or are safety hazards.
(b) Topographic alterations /grading and filling.
(1) Unless part of a building permit, the City shall require a grading and filling
permit for:
a. The movement of more than ten (10) cubic yards of material on steep slopes,
within shore impact zones or in bluff impact zones.
b. The movement of more than fifty (50) cubic yards of material outside steep
slopes, shore impact zones or bluff impact zones.
(2) The following requirements shall apply to construction permits, grading and filling
permits, conditional use permits, variances or subdivisions
a. Wetlands shall not be filled without a permit from the watershed board.
b. The owner or contractor shall design and conduct alterations to insure that
the work exposes only the smallest amount of bare ground for the shortest time
possible.
C. All development and site work shall meet the City's erosion control
ordinance.
d. The owner or contractor shall not place fill or excavated material in bluff
impact zones.
e. The commissioner must authorize all alterations below the ordinary high water
level
f. Topographic changes shall only be done if they are accessory to permitted or
conditional uses and do not adversely affect adjacent or near--by - properties,
g. The City will permit the placement of natural rock riprap, including
associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, if the
following conditions are met:
1. The finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot
vertical.
2. The landward extent of the riprap is within ten feet of the ordinary high
water level.
3. The height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not
exceed three feet.
(3) The commissioner must approve all connections to public waters. This includes
excavations where the intended purpose is to connect to a public water, such as
boat slips, canals, lagoons or harbors.
31 1 -22 -96
Sec. 36-568. Placement and design of streets, driveways or parking areas. 4
(a) Owners and contractors shall design public and private streets, driveways or parking
areas to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening
from public waters.
(b) Streets, driveways or parking areas shall meet structure setback standards from the
ordinary high water level. These facilities shall not be within bluff or shore impact zones
if there are other reasonable options. If no reasonable options exist, these facilities may
be placed within bluff and shore impact areas. However, the owners and contractors of these
facilities must design and install them to reduce adverse impacts.
(c) Watercraft access ramps, approach roads or access - related parking may be within shore
impact zones if the vegetative screening and erosion control conditions of this article are
met.
Sec. 36 -569. Storm water management.
(a) General Standards.
(1) When possible, designers and contractors must use natural drainage ways, wetlands
and vegetated soil surfaces to convey, store, filter and hold storm water runoff
before it discharges to public waters.
(2) Development must be planned and conducted to minimize disturbed areas, runoff
velocities and erosion.
(3) Developments shall maximize the use of surface drainage and vegetation to control
storm water runoff. Where surface drainage and vegetation are not adequate to
handle storm water runoff, the City will allow the use of buried pipes and man -made
materials and facilities.
(b) Specific Standards.
(1) Newly constructed storm water outfalls to public waters must provide for filtering
or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface debris before discharge.
(2) -All development within shoreland areas shall be consistent with the Maplewood
Drainage Plan,
0
Sec. 36-570. Special provisions for nonresidential uses.
(a),Standards for nonresidential uses.
(1) Surface water - oriented nonresidential uses must meet the following standards:
a. Such uses shall have topographic and vegetative screening of parking areas and
structures.
b. Uses that require short -term watercraft mooring for patrons must centralize
these facilities and design them to avoid navigation obstructions and to be
the minimum size necessary.
(2) Nonresidential uses without water - oriented needs and having frontage on a public
water must meet one of the following standards:
a. Double the normal setback from the ordinary high water level setback, or
32
1 -22 -96
b. Screen the use from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming
summer conditions.
(b) Mining: Processing machinery shall meet the structure setback standards from the
ordinary high water level and from bluffs.
Sec. 36 -571. Conditional Uses.
(a). In addition to the normal standards for evaluating a conditional use permit, the
following standards shall apply within shorelands:
(1) There would be no soil erosion or pollution of public waters during or after
construction.
(2) The proposed plan would limit the visibility of structures from public waters
(assuming summer conditions).
(3), The types, uses and numbers of any watercraft that the project would generate would
be compatible with the capacity of the public waters to handle these watercraft.
(b) Conditional use permit conditions: The City Council may attach special conditions in
shorelands. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Increased setbacks from the ordinary high water level.
(2) Limitations on removing the natural vegetation or requiring the planting of
additional vegetation.
(3) Special location, design and use provisions for structures,, sewage treatment
systems, watercraft launching and docking areas or parking areas.
Sec. 36 -572. Expanding or adding decks to nonconforming structures.
A deck may be added to or expanded on a structure if the deck would be within the required
setback from the ordinary high water level. The deck must meet all of the following criteria:
(1) The structure existed when the City established the structure setbacks.
(2) There is no reasonable location fora deck that meets or exceeds the existing ordinary
high water level setback of the structure.
(3) The deck encroachment toward the ordinary high water level does not exceed 15 percent
of the existing setback of the structure from the ordinary high water level or does not
encroach closer than 30 feet, whichever is more restrictive.
(4) The deck would be primarily wood, and not have a roof, screening or windows.
.Sec. 36 -573. Land Suitability.
Each lot created through subdivision shall be suitable for development with minimal
alteration. The City shall not consider lots suitable for development that would create any
of the following effects:
(1) Susceptibility to flooding
(2) Filling wetlands
(3) Building on soils with severe development limitations
(4) Creating severe erosion potential
33 1 -22 -96
(5).Buil:ding on steep topography
(6) Inadequate water supply or sewage treatment capabilities
( a loss of protected wildlife habitat
Sec. 36 -574. Planned Unit Development's (PUD"s).
(a) "Suitable area" evaluation: The City shall determine the suitable area for calculating
the density of a residential PUD as follows:
U project site .shall be divided into tiers. Tier boundaries shall be
approximately parallel to the boundary of the public water at the following
intervals, going landward from the public water:
Class I and II waters-
, first tier
Class I and II waters -
second and: additional tiers
Class III and IV waters
Class V waters
All river classes
Unsewered Sewered
feet l (feet)
200 200
267
200
26.7
267
400
320
300
.300
(2) The suitable area within each tier shall exclude wetlands, bluffs or drainage
easements for storm water ponds.
(b) Residential PUD Density Evaluation: The procedures for determining the base density
of .a PUD and density increase multipliers are below. The City or the developer may transfer
allowable densities from any tier to any other tier further from the waterbody. The developer
or owner may not transfer allowable densities to a tier closer to a waterbody.
(1) To determine the residential PUD base density, divide the suitable area within each
tier by the minimum lot size for lakes.or the minimum lot width times the tier
depth for creeks.
(2) Density increase multipliers:
a. The maximum base densities may be increased if the proposed plan meets or
exceeds the dimensional standards in Section 36- 566 and the other criteria in.
this section.
b. The City shall allow the density increases in Item c. below if:
1. The developer increases the structure setbacks from the ordinary high
water level to at least 50 percent greater than the minimum setback, or
2. The proposal reduces the impact on the public water an equivalent amount
with vegetation, topography or other means acceptable to the City and the
setback is at least 25 percent greater than the minimum setback.
14
C. Allowable density increases for residential planned unit developments:
Maximum density increase
Density evaluation tiers within each ti er. fpercent)
First
50
Second
100
Third
200
Fourth
200
Fifth.
200
d. Regardless of the above, the density may not increase above the density
allowed by the City's land use plan.
(c) Open Space Requirements: Planned unit developments must contain open space meeting all
of the following criteria:
1. At least 50 percent of the total project area shall be open space.
2. The City shall not include dwelling units or sites, road rights -of -way or land
covered by road surfaces, parking areas or structures as open space.
3. Open space may include outdoor recreational facilities or water- oriented accessory
structures or facilities.
4. For residential PUD's, at least 50 percent of the shore impact zone of existing
developments or at least 70 percent of the shore impact Zone of new developments
must be preserved in its natural state.
(d) Storm water management: Each PUD must have a storm water management plan consistent
with the City's drainage plan and erosion control ordinance.
(e) Centralization and design of structures and impervious surfaces: The following
standards shall apply to PUD's:
1. On -site water and sewage systems must be centralized.
2. The plans shall cluster buildings and impervious surfaces to maximize open space.
3. The plans shall centralize shore recreation facilities. Shore recreation facilities
shall include, but not be limited to, swimming areas, docks, watercraft mooring
areas and launching ramps. The number of spaces provided for the regular beaching,
mooring or docking of watercraft must not exceed one for each allowable dwelling
unit or site in the first tier (except existing mooring sites in an existing
commercially used harbor). The developer or owner may provide launching ramp
facilities, including a small dock for loading and unloading equipment, for use by
occupants of dwelling units or sites located in other tiers.
4. The developer shall design structures, parking areas and other facilities to reduce
their visibility (under summer conditions) from public waters and adjacent
shorelands. This design shall use vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color
or other means. The plans shall use existing vegetative and topographic screening
as much as possible. The City may require additional vegetation to help screen
these facilities.
5. All accessory structures and facilities, except water - oriented accessory
structures, must meet the required principal structure setback. The plans shall
35
1 -22 -96
centralize all accessory structures and facilities.
T
• - nted accessory 6. The Ci may allow water orie y structures and faci 1 i ti es i f they meet
d the design. standards in Section 36 -566. The plans shall centralize all
o r exceed g V11
water - orientated accessory structures.
Secs. 36 -575- 36 -581. Reserved,
SECTION 22 p
. This section drops the def i ni ti on of mining as follows
SECTION 23. This. Ordinance shall take effect after the City approves it and the official
newspaper publishes it.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes all
3. Food and Food Handlers Code Amendment (2nd Reading)
a. P
Manager McGuire resented the staff report.
9
b. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifi of the
report.
C. Mayer Bast introduced the following Ordinance and moved its_ado tion:
.`.
ORDINANCE NO. 746
AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE REGULATIONS FOR FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS
The p Y PP
Maplewood City Council a the following changes to the Maplewood Code
of Ordinances:
Section 1. This section changes the food establishment code by deleting the
existing Sections 13 -17 through 13 -41.
Section 2. This section adds a new Section 13- 17— Minnesota Department of Health
. Rules adopted by law.
Section 3. Subject t any s pecific modifications set forth after this, Maplewood
y
b reference Minnesota State Board of Health Rules Chapter 4625, Parts
adopts Y �
4625.2400 to 4625.7801 as contained by law in the document entitled Rules and
uirements for Food and Beverage.. Establishments, and all subsequent amendments
Req uirements d
the reto in effect on December 31, 1995. A copy of such regulations shall be filed and
f
available for inspection in the .office of the City C1 erk and the Department o
Comm p .
it Development Chapters 4625.2400 to 4625.7801 are hereby modified by
P
deleti
the terms "Board" and "Commissioner" and substitute the term Environmental
Health p
Official." in l ace thereof or other successor desi "Environmental
or authorized by
the City Council.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes -all
36 1 -22 -96
J. NEW BUSINESS
110 Pondview Apartments "NO PARKING" Request
a Manager McGuire presented the staff report..
b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report.
c. Councilmember Koppen moved to direct staff to establish a no -park, ng
zone around the cul de sac at the end of Iv Avenue East, and further
direct the Public Works Department to erect aDaroDriate signs.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes -all
2. Driveway Ordinance - First Reading
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report:.
b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report.
c. Councilmember Rossbach moved to ap rov_e first rea n_g _of an _ Ordinance
revising the current Driveway Ordinance_
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
3. July 4th Celebration
a. Manager McGuire requested this item be tabled until the February 12,
1996 meeting.
b. Mayor Bastian moved to table this .item until February 12, 19, 96.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
4. Landscape Architect Selection for Carver and Edgerton
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Parks &Recreation Anderson presented the specifics of the
report.
c. Councilmember Carlson moved to retain Brauer &Associates be retained to
develop Master Plans for Edgerton and Carver Community Center /Park
sites.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
37 1 -22 -96
5. Loitering Ordinance - 1st Reading
E
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Public Works Collins presented the specifics of the report.
C* Councilmember Carlson mov to approve first reading of an Ordinance to
control 1 of t_eri within_ the City,
Seconded.by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
6. Audit of Fire Departments
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Bastian moved to delay the ,f seal year 1995 _d t, of the
i ndeDendent fire deDartments one near and the audit for fiscal _years
1995 and 1996 be done together _ in ,1997 to minimize costs
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all
7. Community Center Financial Report
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Finance Faust presented the specifics of the report.
c. Director of Parks and Recreation Anderson presented a report o what is
planned for the future.
NO ACTION REQUIRED
8. Council /Staff Retreat
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Bastian moved. to set April 18 -19, 1996 as the date for the
Council /Staff Retreat, at Riverwood Conference Center, Monticello, MN.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -all
COl1NCILMEMBERS ALLENSPACH AND KOPPEN VOLUNTEERED TO FOLLOW UP ON FACILITATORS.
38 1 -22 -96
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Will Rossbach, 1386 East County Road C
..a. Mr. Rossbach spoke regarding the Capital Improvement Plan to install
lighting on - several -- City- recreation -- facilities -and expandi - ng - the s-i tes
b. Mr. Rossbach opposes this plan on the basis that this improvement will
draw people from other .communities creating traffice prob ems, etc. and
would not be fair to the residents
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Smoking Compliance Checks
a. Councilmember Carlson stated he had information indicating only 61% of
p
Ma lewood was in compliance with smoking regulations.
2. Mayors Update
Mayor.Bastian commented on various items, including:
a. Montgomery Watson - Watershed Plan
b. North Maplewood Coalition of Neighbors - concerned with traffic
problems at.Highway 36 and White Bear Avenue, and traffic capacity
on 694 and White Bear Avenue.
c. Multi-family dwellings
d. Association for Sensible Airport Planning
e. Ramsey County League of Local Government - 1 -25 -96 at new League
building.
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
NONE
N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
1Q :11 P.M.
Lucille E. Aurelius
City - Clerk
39 1 -22 -96
r�
i
MINUTES
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
JOINT MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
AND MAPLEWOOD ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1996
COMMUNITY ROOM, MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER
2100 WHITE BEAR AVENUE
I. CALL TO ORDER
Acting Mayor Allenspach called the meeting to order at 9 :02 a.m.
The following Councilmembers were present for the meeting:
Sherry Allenspach
Gary Bastian (arrived at 10:53 a.m.)
Dale Carlson
George Rossbach _
Also present were: Mike McGuire, City Manager
Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager
II. COMMUNITY DESIGN AND REVIEW BOARD
Members present: Gordon Berggren
Staff present: Melinda Coleman, Director of Community Development
Council and the Board discussed the advisory role of the Board, and how its
responsibilities were separate from the Planning Commission. Councilmembers
indicated they were satisfied with the performance of the Board. In written
communication, Board members bel ieved that some of the issues the Council sent to it
would more properly be addressed to developers. Councilmembers replied they were
asking questions to be comfortable that the Board had considered specific issues.
There was general discussion about the City's follow -up inspections for conformance
with approved designs, and for general building and site maintenance. The City
historically has had limited staff resources in this area, relies on complaints and
changes in occupancy to make inspections. Berggren also indicated concern about the
proliferation and relative permanence of portable signage.
Carlson suggested that the Board look into aesthetic designs for corridor improvements:
e.g., White Bear Avenue, Century Avenue, and Rice Street.
U
Minutes Page Two
February 3, 1996
III. 'HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA)
Members present: Tom Conley, Lorraine Fischer, Larry Whitcomb
Staff present: Melinda Coleman, Director of Community Development
HRA members had identified four issues it wished to discuss with the Council.
1)
Truth-in-Ho using Apparently, around five percent of house sales do not comply with the
City's truth -in- housing requirement. Council and Board members believed this to be a
reasonable compliance level. Reminders should be mailed to realtors, and persons selling
their own houses could be reminded through Maplewood in Motion
2 Goals for Livable Communities Act: Maplewood already complies with the benchmarks
developed from the Act, and will probably continue to do so if historic patterns of private
housin g construction continue. Carlson suggested that as it considers affordable housing
proposals, the HRA should be sensitive to transportation needs (e.g., accessibility through
N.E.S.T.). Fischer asked the Council to consider buying marginal or run -down housing
as it becomes available, so that the housing may be upgraded or razed to allow
redevelopment. Coleman noted that the City should to renew its participation in the
Minnesota Housing and Finance Agency (MHFA) first -time home -buyer program.
3) Encourage Maintenance and Improvement of Residences Council concurred with
Fischer's proposal that the HRA. approach local banks to encourage them to approve loans
that approach the cost of home improvements (rather than typically lover loan amounts
which reflect the increase in the market value of the property). To encourage major
capital maintenance, there needs to be clarification about what improvements will not be
calculated as an increase in the assessed value of a property.
4) Senior Housing The HRA believed that there needed to be more housing choices for
seniors, especially in alternative senior housing.
IV. PLANNING COMMISSION
Members present: Les Axdahl, Lorraine Fischer, Dave Kopesky, Milo Thompson
Staff p resent: Melinda Coleman, Director of Community Development
P
The Council and Commission discussed four items identified by the Commission.
Minutes
February 3, 1996
Page Three
1) PUD Ordinance: The. Commission had forwarded recommendations to the Council some
time ago, and did not believe it was informed of subsequent Council action. It currently
believed that PUDs were more appropriate for environmentally - sensitive areas. Members
expressed concern with implementation and long -term monitoring of PUDs as approved.
2) Commercial Property Study Council informed the Commission that it had briefly
considered the study at a recent Council meeting, and had decided to spend some time
reviewing it.. Council planned to schedule some discussion on the study at a Council
meeting in the near future. Fischer believed that adult uses should now be included in the
scope of the study.
3) Phalen Watershed District Council noted the City is active in the District's planning
processes. City staff uses District policy recommendations in land management practices
and in review of development proposals. There was discussion about the relative merits
of treatment or detention designs for stormwater quality.
4) Public Comment at Planning Commission Meetings Commission members indicated a
desire to invite more public comment or hold public hearings for many of the proposals it
considers. Residents have expressed concerns that they are not informed of Planning
Commission meetings which take place prior to public hearings at the City Council.
Councilmembers said they preferred the technical review and recommendations regarding
land use by the Commission, while having the policy decision made remain at the
Council level.
V. PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Members present: Rick Brandon, Craig Brannon, Jeanne Ewald, Peter Fischer,
Bonnie Qualley
Staff present: Bruce Anderson, Director of Park and Recreation
Commission members reviewed many of the issues and plans they were considering.
* Park Availability Charges (PAC): Ensuring the fees were comparable with neighboring
cities. PAC can be used only for acquisition and development- -what will happen when
new development is minimal, and money is needed for acquisition, development, and
replacement?
Minutes
February 3, 1996
Page Four
Land management plan for open space properties. Develop volunteer programs for site
restoration and management. Groups will need to be larger than what has been attracted
for nine parks thus far included in the Adopt -a -Park program.
Athletic facility program. Determine availability, level of upkeep, and possible need to
reprogram facilities. What will be effect of Goodrich Park being converted to County's
uses?
Monitor programs and fees. Monitor those programs that are not well -used.
Recreation trail system. Encourage connectivity throughout Maplewood, and in so doing,
year -round use of parks. Develop trailheads at junction of Munger and Gateway Trails,
and at Gateway Trail and Maplewood Municipal Complex.
* Community Center policies.
* Satellite community centers -- development and programming.
Mark and monitor park boundaries to safeguard park resources.
* Park redevelopment. Look to combine active and passive uses in most parks.
* Continue to pursue grants.
Mayor Bastian arrived at 10:53 a.m.
* Betterment of environmentally - friendly practices in park management.
* Continue to work and coordinate with other governments.
Investigate a city -wide cleanup for residences as well as community park/open space
cleanup days. Such a program could coincide with Earth Day.
Carlson encouraged the Commission to develop recommendations for priorities and long-
term financial plans of investments and program offerings the City should undertake.
VI. HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Members present: Lynne Croes, Carol Cude, Marie Koehler, Linda Wainio
Staff present: Sherrie Le, Human Resources Director
Commissioners gave an overview of the functions of the HRC. It works to ensure
inclusion of all groups in City activities, handles Police Department referrals of victims
of certain crimes, and provides advice on human relations issues.
The HRC is currently looking at joint offerings with neighboring HRCs in Roseville,
North Saint Paul, and White Bear Lake. Efforts are very preliminary at this time. The
HRC is also in the process of naming the recipient of the Diversity Awareness Award and
sponsoring a poster contest for diversity awareness in the schools. Council suggested the
Community Center as a venue for the award ceremony, and that the Council allocate
Minutes Page Five
February 3, 1996
funds in the budget instead of relying on the ability to award grants from the Charitable
Gambling Tax Fund. Commissioners also noted their support of diversity awareness
plays at North High School, and that the City's assistance in producing these plays came
from lawful gambling funds.
Council and commission members expressed concern about comments by a number of
Maplewood residents who opposed the conversion of the former Maplewood branch
library building to the Lsmaili Muslim Church. Staff related that this issue will be on the
agenda for the February 6, 1996, HRC meeting.
VII. POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
Members present: .Bob Dollerschell, Steve Gunn, Clayton Qualley
Staff present: Sherrie Le, Human Resources Director
Commission members briefly discussed what they accomplished over the past year and
what they're currently doing. They have updated some job descriptions and
classifications (e.g.,, captain and sergeant), and been involved in several new hires (most
of which became open due to retirements). They were complimentary about the quality
of the staff s background work on candidates. There was discussion about Maplewood's
testing and evaluation systems, and how they are different from other jurisdictions'. The
list is updated (re- tested) about every 18 months.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Carlson moved, and Bastian seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 11:55 a.m. Motion
approved 4 - 0.
AGENDA NO.--F._
TO: Ci ty Manag 1Vlana AGENDA REPORT
FROM: Finance Director �� --- -
RE' APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: February 19
ry 96
Attached is a listing of aid '
authori P bills for informatio
zed payment in accordance wi P The City Manager ha '
th City Council g approved poh• • cles. s reviewed the bills and
ACCOUNTS
$6,680.57 Check 11 6070 dated 1 -17 -96 for Period 12 (December, 1995
$69) 375939 Che )
ks #23601 thru #23694 dated ( 1 -23 -96 for Period 12 $142, 999.38 c 1995)
Checks 06058 thru #6069 dated 1 -11 -96 thru 1 -17 -96 for
$347,119.80 Period 14 (Janus Checks 1996
cks #23604 thru 023695 d �' )
dated 1 - - 96 for Period 14 ( January, 1996)
$ 363.90 Che
Checks #6071 thru #60872 date _ 18 -96 for Period 14
d 1
$139, 320.37 (January, 1996) Ch ,
Checks #23706 thru #23827 dated
ted 1 30 -96 for Period 12 ( D
$139,407.57 Che cks #23706 th ecember, 1995)
ru #23827 dated ( De 1 - - for Period 12
$25)206-22 Checks ember, 1995)
cks #23836 ghru #23908
dated 2 -6 -96 for Period 12
$113)819.63 Chec (December, 1995)
cks #6083 thru #6102 dated _
1 25 96 thru 1 - - for P '
eriod 14 (January, a 1996)
$489,118-96 Checks #23839 thru #23914 dated 2 -6 -96 for Period 14 (January, 1996)
$1,624 ) 011.79 Total
Accounts Payable
PAYROLL.,
$267,929.94 Payroll Checks dated 1 -26 -96
Payroll Deduction check 10298 thru #50310 dated 1_26_96.
$315)934-80 Total p ayroll
$1,939,946.59 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims.
rb
Attachments
CAWPWIN601AG ENDA%APPRCLMS. FEB
AA
u ---'
19
--1 �1ox2
czr/ OF MAPLEWOOD
DA"n..
VENDOR
NUMBER I',IAIvIE
ITEM
60 70
TIE
TELEPIA ONE
- Y-1:
14
LE
5 7 9
EPHONE
HJ
5 39
TELE
TIELEPIADIIE
-40NE
57.6.3
32.75
J6
E
58
IIE
TELEPHOIIE
TE
j 114
TEL-1-:11-IONE
40
71 so 73)
23602 01/2-3/96
REFUND WOVIENS VOLLEYEML..I..
686
RIEFUI W OMI:: IS
8.00
8.00
a
i
C� 'f• MAF
} t:�F�'
tat:�r� •�� ..I r. »J
II:I�4/ r:: tale; : 1•
:l .I: C)D 1 ' F ,.
- .
w.0 { _ ._ :
DAT r h•It.�t'1][:ii:::F4 t11::h(I)t:�f �,�F::l= II)OF
_ ...._ _
--
X. r:.r+, J4JAVIC:; .
• h'J
96 t: yt ::r- - rr''•r -r o i
f
7 TI » INC _
•• hrIr Ir"t� 1
w
�,,�► __.. 96 .! Iz) ..w -�• -- -- - - -- -__ ____ - 1111 { »l
h
�'t�t �af"ht�' 4,1t"i(ahlt a
_ Jh4 r
2� i60sY' 01/23/96 ..._ .. _ _.,..__ - . . - _ - __ .. t�'I:::rt.1i`�f�'1 , ww OVERNIT 3 .. 82 - -- -_ - - - - - -- 3 9 - ,�
TF•ICIF E.Clh! p F•!�'1F F� I, t~:�' REFUND VIC T. 28.
0 0 CON ''f
�' a <)C)
- W . _t) n r A ... t t +.r. �:: N - r:c:y��t .wr�'�- - _ __ _ _ - .�. w Cyr)
_ .. z{ Ih(�r
-..
"
�._ EL
� F :
1 "'1„
28. o
••'
w.
,.,.� yy { . �_ t 1 1 .r l.J A)�:� •�"`' ••, __ _....� M .. 85 — { 2%5
•} {) _ _ __ _ ter .t.
hriJ� �w.• ,
23 621. "` " w} „ �.... C«-1'';E' ).1: 'y. ( "14►'J . '� {;+ —__ —_ _ — -- _ —. _ _ 7 FEE _.. -)._ _... -------
1. te r "• r-r� J ---__
..
t "
2
2 ' }� } {).f. /.�'�i/ _.. _:.. _ __....._ { "t.1F�'PI... Its.,.} •w. t �'�} .F {) . � z;
r 6 .• ,�} ~
h.� �..r)�C '`' 'fir= �' CC;
C3
COLLE
PROGRAM SUPPLIES 2E
I-PGRAM 29
23629 01 _ ... _- ._.._...... ..'iii
ALLE
Z ..._ _ N TE,- ; C, �`1 �.. C,C11. . _ _ - - -__ _ _ ___- - _______ - _ —_—_— fa „ f:3�?
1. J 1. /.�:96 _ w 0.1. q _ �_�. �_..__ _ -. - W .._LL..� _ TRAVEL & 7'F4 A I hr:F hIC� — - 46 .1 �} 32 '
W
w ._ : .
50 io 0
.,
L.. t:: 35
--- - - -- -
w� t.�F''F'
� �. /,�,.}�✓
*3 20281 •, , - - -- -..__ , __ _ _ -- -- ..:r F:: � w.. F:: t:it.,i 1: F�'t'riF.:: hl'4' 107 „ t � y..,,W ...� .............__ . __..,_.._
fyF�t'1�I+i t �'1r S X: AKIE(�Y n :rlt1 _______ _
f.. N --
- --
�+.t "l[:Jt�tirtir'1 �• , - � -- -- - -'- _ _ ,�..�� .. C3f:3 9 E-3 o ot
}t.1r • •'
•�r:xt:Fa --
t•
F,.F . ES
,
' •r I:
�t.atrflt'�J itJ1••'I~'r :r F:' <�` �•► i. 41
,
w.
s s
», ..,r.w
~{
_
Ar( Stjj:: F� r:. :r. F�'�� r'
ry 44 X.
a _ 45
l::.I:.t -
,. 47
.........._.._�. Jt:J!•�t'�rrl fit »1r''F''l..:i:r::.�` — -- .__.�._. � r » �••� ,, 48
.. ._ .•
_.._. —
I '�a:O(:ih;
•
*75
.
..r
1 ` RAPI 3 r F Ci __ ... _ ..._ _ __. 15.7
_ . __ 50
- � 5
23636 23636 01/23/96 -•,.- Y ._. _ _.___— _ F i »�Fti'I1P�i c��l.!! �'r• I ,. .1, �i ,T; ti r. w »
' - -
•7 I:y
_ .. -.
k . .;y.• _�__y _ r'f•�:CaGRAI�t ;�tar"'F•'I �rtM~ � . t' „ r1) 56
�R • ..} a. / ,.� • ». • - ::.F -ra. ca...r~'J...i »c.a�r+ ic.:' �. « 57
% .I. �'
.h
M •E '�' 1 ... _._
{ wt It
EQUIPMEN
..•X
fit„ 20-29 61
641 '4'
__. :::�: tart:; �: rat, r r
_ Rl- JIYIr:. ht 1 �:� N � yC .... -- ---- --- H : — - . 64
:F r :.I„
F.*Qt.� ]• PlI
E147-
fF::hl1
6 3 9
T I��
23 641. �a ./�:''�Y r•} ... .. .. C;I lt.�C. L» D-1 t3T q - #6 ? . - F •t _ _ _- -' _ __ . �'f „ . ��'• - � � - --
:� _
}{ y# 7 ��
.. F-VOR - ._ . ! •�f�r'7 fit 1i� .:•�
...t �.. ... I
48 744-
_.
Vt:aE•1c::r••tRE.-:
10 _ .,
Y CJ
�ltalJt: /t:`I
t'lt�X}
W t-KeHL 3 N I•...� 01) . f, I t• A I K k
...rs
.. ..
5 CHE: _
• l VE 1 V
6 .Jrrl��r:la
_. _ --
8 01/23/96 43030o CHECK
KNO _
,a rlfYft:JUNT
PROGRA Aivol-JNT
SUPPLIEr
10
23646 SUP PLIES
11 01/23/96 510500
•
»RY ____ 30-.13 12 ,� — 648 C} �. /�'�i /{ ) ..)E - - C.J�R F �' SALE - -- - _ - -- _. - - -- — - -_ -- ...�"
13 _.._ -._ .T.�.._. _.--_--� __ - _ - .... MINN. I'rl �. htt�i
7�
ZEVE
14 PITHL.Y SAL-ES TAX 7�10 .40
IYITHLY SALES -- — _ .
�16 00
23649 11THL SALES TAX 7.4346.00
17 01/23/96 54240o
14.
• t� tali: :t:�L�E::r�'► ..._ _ -._ _ __ .. . _ _ _ --
T•:C C.lhl f:�'{ •tt:1'1't:ICali�11:=
W ��l�ll�l
c�..f1�i::1� �}:f.f�''=Y 't'•lF : ::Fti F��a�: � "�a 66.1.10f
........ 1111ORTH S 89.00 ------------
IDUSTT 20 6,15 1.5o __. _ 89.00
.« .0 I . f r�t�l :f: 'rtat�
MENT
..
--- --- ME
24 IR,
PA. - S & M'T'h!
'� L E`t*iT'
2,**36-'.--.s6 0:1./2, 321
26 " 1.J.1 I I tl. »I�lT
hlt:)t� T{• IERI- l A •l: .... ... ••
27 ,�:'. ♦ aca,'-� .a{. 1 .. ».. _ _.. - - r._ ._ _ ..... _ - _.. �.. _. „ �.' I. • .) Ica .... 9 , I
�8 --- __ __��t•� � I••II: »I 'tl�t =t� �K ,i..�:.�3 „ fig' �. _.- ,....�....
99 -- .. ,�..
- - ._ .._� t.Jl. -
.�..♦ ft�•�ao 0 - -_ -- - ,, ~.� " ^ �• r�: _ .�tJ'f::.!••i 1 " .�„ •! _3
. ..... Fa _
3u te {: 3oi { }} CaC`'T'[.J!••'i.J;.) CAR Wt�`t�`I t -- --- - -- _ -- --- .''' ,,.:,
• _,.) ..
31 WASt 2..44
w
WA( HE : :S _
23/96
goo I.' ' t # I' �� 4C
'''ac..�fa ( ?:! /'�''=i /� "• +•,. rti .. " '" _ - I°'lat:Jhh�_. t..::;a a
..
� ,. fit}
_ .__... _..._ REDEVELOPMENT �: __T_ _-- , - - -Y . _. _._ _,__..__ ,__,_ -. .. Red. --- p-�___.______ __.�_ ' " �`�'
f Y
• _
" RAI Stjl::'F'L-IE
39 .200.0
..... . _..��ert
s _.
PR(. -- - - -___ � • ICI: 24
40 tir�tt'r1 ..)I.JF•`i•. L•. - ..
41 - _ -- " •• I� of RESAL ....
_
i
2,3670 - - - - - -t- R
' L« l
;•it.11 °'1 �.
"�i
44 41 ca - _.r - -- - _
f
140V 95 D A TA •« f•♦
NOV 9 • r''I � ?•� t^3T
X PR OCESSING 23 5., 157 - _
__ - -- DI: t:: ��;:i
..........
�(t �
I}�T'r1 r••'I• tiCl(:l:..af:�:l' moo„ 7::
) .J
.
I C 9 '.1
•
4J : st�a7�, . / + =' "" S S(31 .. J }1•• t:: 9 DATA K __..�: „ f.3f� -- _ __- u«I Gil
RAMSEY �. +t.It.Jt rT'Y AXES ag.-
51
• - _,....
«... ".
1,3 �O 'ERTY T
R.( TAX }
)! • {:: RTY
r�
0
• :Y2
li „f
J`
• 'Y
L 92-0 r4 .• :L � �
t
RTY T AXES
f: 2
T Y 'f 1XE(C 92 9 '"8. :(• �l
AXES 9 .... •t 7 n ,
R
0
c „ 28 r ,;,
!�
r ,
VOI
CIT
rr-r�1< ...�
..,
f
I��'taF`' � r l
.
I
VE:.taz }OR
-
-
_
._
...
NUMBER
NAME
•.■ .
.(. r IY -
2iY� ,u,
01 /23/96
75 0
... ..... DESCJ� I
4
- -_
1 �'t
4c::F•Ir.»
.:, »Y
.1 _._ _
�.1T:r. Clikf » tYf __ .. _ _ - _.
t:• .. ..:...... F z�w�t::: M F- C)R r ESE_
.�t.�r f r
� r�ic:.�t
,
.. .. t.. I .. .
..r'� i .
:.. �... az. t.tc. r f r.
.�r�:
�_ _ _
68. 7
.rr�r'r
---- —__ _- —
.___.....__.
EQUIPMENT xF f�r
—_ - -_-
� � �'
+
23675 X3.1 ,�,. /t��c,,
».: ,- �- �---
7!: #437,13
---___ __ _ __
yti ... __
ES i�r� r-• •r•
.;�!••'t ='t. :1: '`t•` ..
f:.,:} ..» t f .. 1 ::• �:C:t::.
CE
a. t .._' �....
Hr�
_ _..._- .__..._.
,_ -- . _ - -. _ - -_
r��r�' CONSUL. Cyf:tiCli.1F�' pp
• I
__
—
95 ti 36
2..
_23676 0 3/96
jtt
_ ._.._.._
_
(3
_
���: R G :'F
. _
2
r;
is.
..,,
�', }t`}77 0 /x•'3/
. _. __ ....
��«y f ,, t,
..._.t�r� i:�I...tJ�� ���:''
.` �... _._.'_�. _ _ .. ._..._.
F k:: {:#
_._ P 1 . '4i.�i7RAM ���.�t » tw
�y
.. }� ,� F382. � # :�
—_ -,
,: }� � 882 8
841 40
c I`fy NORTHLAND
SIG
82
(32"90
1,11
r p r�t.1t.» h. I� � �"Y i�t� -`---
-- __�_ ._... - _
C ;r•�
+ « �
0� - :t I� "•w,�t'
��..�.._..�._......_.._ __..•...ti._..._ _..._._.�.....w __......L,_.
8.0650 » __.
S T i:#rlt••...}
COMPUTER . � •, - • - - - -- - _..�_.._.__ -- _._.__ -� _..
F � [!�
r: j 23
�'; 2/1
�;,'
+
,.,.,•, a / r
- ••
C:f» (r /!-�
•.
__ �_. _._...w_ ..._ �,_..__. _
�_
I• » t" -- _ _
..... .... i.» I •t 1 C.I.»
''
_
25
.# #
..
l,.t
.
r .
172-66
28
.�... 01 / �:` /96 -
i�t�()t� ._._ _ :. ��
00
_._ y __ _u � �
�'t� :L..�:.t: VIf:lht�:.
__ _ . -_
05
-____
_ 32
_. ".� _� � _ : .. __ ..._ �
U - c .. IaJI: ST i
TELEPHONE
.....
---- _
3 13
_..._.._
M}
M. - _
ITEb
3 18-2
3
I 1 � �
01 / 23 / 96
� �
C� 0 �. �. f�
___ . _ _.___ ___._- _.__
-__ -_ ._ iJhl'�- _�'C�l:�tri�_ �. C'L.. ClT'F•1 � htC:
:�
.. - ... 36
• 'I 37
,.} .. .. 2 � ti
+
r
!.3?:
��,.;, _ { �r._.__._.�.�- _
... }�} ♦ r :t. / 23/9
�__ __
{
UNI I��' " • » �+ /
• t...t: l� :fit.. R6 �: I.R()(.1D �•+.
a
- - - -� -
-- -- - ______. _-
t - 'ZO ° �1: R {
_ ,�� '
- __
38
39
1111
S
•
�Jr
_.
L.0,11 ON F:04.11-- -':: ".1._
FZAILROAD
f�I.:.l`1 1
- 1. .
p� o„
'�' Ut'?
. r..,I��
41
� ;--- - - - - -- - -
�,
,�:..:}� }_,�.. � /'S�c�
-_ _ _._ _
t•
t 0170
...
r�'FtiC��•�::F�;TY F-+;E - -- w �... ____..�.,.�_�._..�...�.�_,..... _. W
- � '1 �� 1�� 42
.. t:
_
6 9 2 »
Laf�1 r I.. »
« i., :: •
_
1
.2'35 0:i /.�:...
900276
IVERS
:: }l�1�'Pt...:I:t::: »•• EQUIPMENT NT
1 50„ oo 45
_ ._ ...._
{U r.� • r�Ir~ra•'�s CAF. :l �`
46
____�_ -____ �'i ,. :�;`� 48
2369 �
c�1 2
_�- . ___...� ._ .....
DEL. •
A/R ..� }
- ._. f AL PH
95
_.._
1
h't ..�C� FOR ::.:}'f1l..l:"
t Y
- � � � _. r _ - __...._ _ _ .. -t 9 .a. 2
— ---
- -�1
+;y�•
53
"1 2 4 54 .25
_.
57
} wi t} 58
I
_.. _
�` >4
+
(-
- -- - - - -- - - - -- -
-- -- ----__ _ —
_. _
L y... .._.......
_ ...
_ r W -
_.... _ W _. W
65
67
68
73
76
CT TY VOL
EbJt xt
�
CHE K • . , i .. _
»
�• � r�z� :t ��
(: t:rF I »t.r ...... ..
r, I`ri.11�t�' {f:`I�` DATE : VENDOR - V __ :... ........`.. _.. . _._. ..._ _ __. _. _� _ _ _ ._... . �.. ;F
rl�C�r4 __.:.. .
NUMBER - _
I cy ti
tT
.__ D ES C RIPTION r
i�
541+•'doh _ R. _ ... � _ .....�
Tr1T` . TEM
REASURE _ --
_.
.1 ...�._ .�� �}t1 M � hlf�t N
mo I OR
L.. l , h1[
_...__ _..___. c•' A•�
0
» PAYAl-A-F..' AMOUNT
6060 REASURr.
....�. ,Dr
OP- NATURAL FZE- E31•:tRS
°f
N .
Y .. -Pr
96 541400 `r •�� •y 1 1 f P A Y ABLE r ray
l'06,.y '1 n ,.}�� f f«, 1.1•ti'f. " �- -� '- - - - -__ - -- '`�_....�!,J _.._..........
_ •
...; w 395.0
. •!'' . rN ,
k...._ t'''1'
Lic p
Y 3.) 9 5. 0 0
!3�.,ti • ' v r •a _C..:4 a Tti/w ".+.M'1 »r..� { •,"I'{t �:« - - --_ __ _
� N
fvft:J►�•t:l
6 0 6 r.4 0 1. � � '� - -- - -- - -- - � ••ti ... {� . » t� � t !;:•/ I'4' r" X31.1[" •• �l w �)...y � � � ,•, "" M
121 6622151 P 13 2'
r:'.I~' zy::x
16196
{{ rt � t DE yt •�• �y
l}iJ I i :S:) I.../I; � AJ�.�[, ( J r.1-w .26
txhf
t
TREASU
6066 R
14 1;79. g e l
541.400 VEVI h1:Chfi +I„ `' t" .., .N TC:— '':i'`1Yr1 {F..f:} p L a N ,;� y
f::.t1.��Jr�,f �r�
0:1/17 �; •, t r -.__ � D I• vi »t'�` ,(a I ri:
2,. F•IOL �: DAY :i: hrht _....� Y ..__.._ -..., _u.... _- ... ... r�"r PAYA,� {I...l� � t� �t „ — �a>:3 32
CIO 33
0 -, /!c96 1% TRAIN.TbIr.
}C) l:EA
- , � / . -.
-- - 'r'I'�I", -
, . , ." 'ti W WW W ,... 35
.f ��' I) fit • :� Y • - - __ _ ..._ _... _ _ ._ _ B - �1 rr'.._._.DF�' ar t�f::.r- " " , _ " � ~ �'� ' r.y -------
0 1131
»
_ .... �- r I,r, rig " _ —.�.� _r. c� r "r: »�. s• »• 4 5 f N 9 36
t . .,
'i W u w....- ...___ _
j F'<%r3[:IJ._ -. ...... _ V F'r F.. a: t ", r•' � a r�'�1Y �' 3s
MOTL
_ „ 7 %5 .1201*54 r•, ..v •�' t
'33�;j
r �Ir� E
•_ .�.:'
40
_ :r'`r[•
41 ER
I.tl) .. _ DUt:»f...I...tv1AI�I �, �• — - -- - -. _. -- X }�'tlYf - Ilj:r %IC'S Ira N 00 4
s OE 1. lq(- 8.12-nsl
'3606 REF:UND �r, •. rat::: I!'�
t W 7C
r C1L11�i c AR
113 ..) f CI -w... _. .
y
. w ._ .
4., "`------ - --- -_ -- - - __ —Gtf� rtitsl :..t- .C�' " {•" ..� r�._.. �._ W.. �.. �_.._ �: r ..._..�.- .- �...- �..�..___.___.. to �„ t)�� 5 � �
45 - - --
�:t t l.lr. »r� I
46 l:;r•:
_x.. L..1.11 »t'4 F�'F
' I 1 I::. 3
-iClh '" S..
yy 1
_ .. .. - .. ,r q
01/23/96 C- 0 T 1.1'[.11... t"Ylt�Jl.11::.
0409-1. ARI111
t�l�l •.... ,, ..
�� .i
�1i.17 t:1 .•)�:. ' x'1[71 ".!`1trY
F+,'r
01 /23/96 061-60,5 •'I1"t'r IT
•� ICI
>•�' � I"I� :I. rat
:I
a:
23 _
q � .I. /t �,. ?/ c�� ... .._: ... ... ._._ ... .... _.. T'1�'� �: r`i .l. hi[:a - __..__ . _. _- __ •' .� g /' .. ;:
.�6 •r.l r'E , r1t. L . 64
•� XiIJ 1 L. .. '• �.� ss
t: :.
1
r ..Y
1/2%.
• %. » _u.__ y W_ .. E I
� I* � •/ - _. 0
ry»
M
• - .. 2a3/ t •y 1. - 451 74 69
»
—
R rTrw J t'nr .. �'�'�
-- .r N -
»~ � 11r 71 4
..) a. N - - ---- -- __ 72
.• _._ . ...,_w._... ..' .. O0 73
rw �1 •w f� 74
2 75
- - 76
. i.. w ♦ ti 1J IC» +t.. N ♦tit./
Sul
23 630 5,'a :!. ,{23/ ) 300500 6% K Sl - - . - RV •t. Cl.. - :S t.11� I M• (:3t-�MS & (il...C.I•rH I NG 6 1 . "( 3 2
zf
21
2< !!i�l.l.l' (.lFti�lM & CL.C�'rt••IIN .
- -- _ ._ .... �. �_. _St� . -_-
'i
UN1F )RIIS & CL..CI'rl••1ING
40
,
_...T ,
.11�! :I: ! 7 (:Jt�tilYtti3 & CLN(:l'r!••I x: t
lei 1 .. f 2
'
1 t.litl : I•�'C�F+:IYI;a� � (:rl•.(:1T 1�•I:CttIC; t�5#� w �'��.� ;
� '261 t:1ltl a: h(:Jil��tTl i & CLOTHING
1 {: 4
21
l 1111 F t'TF ME)" & C;L OT'!• 1 M- 3
_ _ .- - -- - _ . _._,.- _- - -- - -- . _. _ _ -i
26 r �
ji
29 23632 3 01/23 � 3C}2w�80 (�I. A DST'(7NE F -:I ZE DIEF » -- - -- --- _
30 I��'ITIT' RE QU: 1REED BY C:(]!�!'rFZA(. %'Y' T't:::Fti!'1�:3 :f'' ;, f•3�i:� N CTt3 't'
_T _ r__..,_ .,. girl (' t•tif.i:�i.a :i�;k•:I BY t:i)N'*fRA % ' t T � ITIE:�
31
..,....._.._ _ ._ .,_ 83 t �' 1:
3., 'i 2� }6; ti,:5 01 /s 3/96 3 +C3t: O DYE:AIR AU'Y•(:3 I•�I: «t .1.1"l � 41
33
I'�I(1.l. ILIT /Vi::.l•-1 •L C: I._t::, : i . �7 N t�5 ,� :I. ., �', i 42
.,. :..:� /{ t�> 3 3026 5 HA N -,- ' c ' --- .3 E::hl l...f:::: :!:f::• UN r' ti S ---_ _ -- -- _ --_- -- :L :3t }N - -- - -- : L ,
35 :SC �� 44
J�F�t'rl.a � (:rL..CI'T'M•I :C 11(:' r� �� - - - - - -- "" ♦. 4:,
36 23640 01/23/96 390300 :t: l�ll�l.l {aT I J Al... f:it.11��'I °'t...Y
37 .,-.. ....... rat !t�`F�'L.1 L ::� t.(.�l.l I °'!Ylt:lLIT' 47
ss .::'..,. 0 • L /�t: X401670 61OL..L..Y T'Y1`1E. FAVORS
S PROGRAM SUPPLIES -� �,. ,
19
39 4 2 . 80 42 >U
2 3642 01./23/96 420150 K1111<0 ` % It A*Y' :C ( :)hIALN A /R F'ROGt"tAM .1t ~'F'IN.
41 42 2% *. * 56 44 01 4504
LAKE: i.3t•t COLLEGE ,�
- - -- -
TRAVEL & TRA I N1!t!(�
43 _... _ _. _ m _. ,._ - 300
44 s:.,. 4 5 01 /23/96 �4 {>�t� ;:>,qp L..l.11tifX� �'Y•I::.I�I ., L..t"tI�I(.,I:« TRAVEL T'I'�f'� .L 141.t. itlt� T -� _ -
23 23/96 511600 IYIA%I CORP
Ftl:«!'&Al S & M f'1 /E« (:IUI F'IYIE «h!T' 1 .-, 85 5 ..75 .L M C iw1 ♦ -i ., 7:�_____ - �,.1
4/
..
.23650 01./x:'• y 19 570 050 t tYlt' •t( i'`Y ('SY�)'T cy I ,)� 975..00
49 R
i.
.. t
.. t
_-
� I�Ir�'r T'���
.. I NN
6U F� IY111:1 I�tT' /�!E'NM-t Crl 'a�4 N 00 J. ,02
t3 `)4
51 23 01/23/96
570 500 IYI(.�'T (:JII'�:(ll...�1., .I. itI( ". 1•+;1'�
52 _
!�� I• "t °'r�t :t: t•� � iY1�1:1: ltl'Y'/ T? :I: C
. _ . - - -._ ._ _ .____.__ _ _ ins
53 �:'., c�•::�2 r;�:1.1 ��� 3r'9�� c��: �3f:3f�0 i-lf1'r a: �Jl�lril.. ::iE::i"t a: I�IAEti;:i (:,R(JI.JI��• T I ,��l...l. ..- _ _ .. -__ _ _._ .__ .._ _ -_ - -- -.
.. �, .. N T'F+;�1:I: ltl :l: hl(:; :I: I�I'Y'E F+:i ♦IE::T' C:C�hll::
54 9 5 00 195 �fj#
• Y 1. M
_
5; .e« ♦:55x5 1 ♦ : 5 01. /x:'•: /96 660 800 I�{t. t+;�'l..l S T ,. I••'>n L. C •I. !' i.)t••' I : : +I�'T' .... ,S•,,I: •h.:.+ ]:tit... Af.3%�t::.0%:;I'�II : :. - - -
1 r6 I'I'r i:3 ., 9 f49 N .5 - 8-1 94 9 ..60 �. �. 3I
C' 2 *,*") , : *l6 0 :1. /23/96 �'S61.1.81 I�I(.11•�:•T VII::.RN A 1.1''C1A.S% ;: ?1.1F'•r'•I... 'c:t ..» s -, +,. '
.1 E:.,a E::(�1.1 a: F' flll:::l�lT' 50 �,
V(aUc: {•ire {:: r•y C
C` I T'Y OF 1" APL EWi.7OD r
r. , 9
9 6
6 .
RE Gi(
s•
�1i:Il.li..i••tf:::Fti/
(•`1 IC 't.. K C
C +t••IE•'C K I
I" ltlX�(. V
VENDOR
:L 'rE::>YI :
'T'E::Crt (
� I
Itli.11 D
DATE N
NIJlYIZ:iI:::Fi N
NAME D
D1:%S[Sks:1:1= •'r:1:Clh! .
:I: '
(:iN•tE "C: K
_
AMOUNT' A
.. i
i
'
2 3622 0
01/2 3/96 1
15 1900
C'PONT'INE NT ALN -..S
C C ` E _. (• � 1
__. b
1
b
236 23 0
0 _ 1
1.7 D
D N A . t•t N l:,... Alyll: «F ,L CA I" ll RCHAND .1. g a l h
h•'R(.lERA c. 5 •
t 1
1
• I
--`_
11 2
236 24
01 / 23/96 }/ 96 1
1 E30:1 Oo D
D.. l.r N A. q D
DENTAL 1
»Y -
12 !
1.r1 »1 "
:I. ,39 1
1 39 9 5
13 0 1 /23/96 .
�•.,362 5
1
..: _
_ . _....
Vl:�t• ICi•_EE AL »L OWAI - 4C E-K .
, �... _..
M 14
.- fro
1:3 _
_ 2362
0 1 / �:: a / 96 2
2 : E
EAS COUNTY LINE NE» "IRE DEPT. N F•�'
17
i "11T' I"• �I:::i.�l.i:l:l��E D BY i..i.7�1�1•r1= �;t =�C:'r 7
-_
eta M 98S .. 2 5
2 ,'36 2 E3 0 :1/23/96 2
260400 F
FAUST., I)Al*%I.I. I::L...__ _
I
___..._�.__....... I
-..__ . _ _
("PITY OF* IIAPI ... IEWOOD
FIAGIE 3
01 /l 9/96 10 J. 2
1 FlIERICH) :1.11
2
R 3
FP
4
C. I - - I r-.: C-* I <
C'•E"C'K
VENDOR
VENDOR
1. *y F*.* m
I T Etil
CI HECK
4
5
DATE.
NAME
DE: 113*C1 F11.1 FIT 101-11
AMOUNT
AITIOUNT
6
SLJF*-F:'I...:[Ec.)*' E n.L):[F:'Mr-*:I%IT
40. 52
3 --
41
:3
9
236,57
01/23/96
661.200
NORTHIERN DOOIR CIOITIF'ANY. j. do
1: NC
...
FZ.FF'AlR & MAINT/E.l.-DO & GROUNDIS
400.00
io
Fzrr F':"A.r R & MA:ENI*/BL..I)('*)' & ('33RDUNIX-3
1299. 00
699.00 . ..
12
13
J A
59
01. / , ? / 9 6
661. 7'5 0
- -- ------- STATEKS POWER"
251.6
8.7 4
15
2701 UTILITKS
IE
S.. 82
16
171
2725 UTILITI ES
130.137
18
1 5
268 .3 5
iq
20
l 62 5 UT' ILITIIES
17
700 UTI Ll T I FE S.
59.34
18
UTILITIEEE-)
10.44.32
2.9
24
2287 UTILITIES
57 76
25
23661
01/23/96
68 11 1.
.:)tJ,r-*'PL.TE:S OFFICE
70.25
7 0.2 5
26
27
28
1
23662
01/23/96
700735
PALMA. ETEVEN T
K--9 HANDLER
3;r.i.. 00
.:i .5 « 0
29
30
31
1
23664
01/23/96
7011.00
f"'ARKSIDE FIRE
PMT REQUIRED BY CrOP-ITRACT
32
33
5
)6
PI" IT' F,.'EQUIRED BY C014TRACT
55.
60n457.00
34
�7
.,234.00
23665
01/23/96
,700.00
.... ...
36
37
`
01/23/96
712105
F"lZZA FAC"TORY
TRAVEL & TRAINING
81.00
a 1 00
3 q
M
40
23667
01 /223
5/96
720600
POSTMASTER
MAIL MAPLFWOOD IN MOTION
et) qOOO.00
6 q 000 oo
41
11
43
23672
01/23/96
7 50 rzi 50
REINFIAra ii%is' - i UTIONAL. F:'('.)(:)D%c.%)
LJF'F:'L..:[E'%:) rEQUIPMEENT
44
45
15
MDSIE. FOR RIESALE
:1.6..74
46
,I ji
IT r. -.
IDSE.. FOR R..*SAL.E
E
825.21
J.
47
48
9
O.l./2%*L*)/96
762400
Fd.JFP'RIDC3'I:7 JOHNSON
STRI:--*I::.*r Fl.-USHEE"R TR(.J(',**K
..1400.00
(m.9 wx).. oo
49
50
51
0
23674
01/23/96
780300
;:3 &T' ;:3 &T' C) r' � C:F. :: PRC)DUC.*Tc.')l INC.
SUPPLIES 229.37
229..37
52
53
1
54
2
23678
01/23/96
(340295
ST F'Al..JI... BAR & REST
c
S
't.JFsr- ... TE(*% r.:.O(.JTF
198.99
55
SUPPL.. I ES
S
30.00
228.99
56
57
4
58
5
23680
01/23/96
S4 -.3 5 2-3 7
c3"TRATUS COMPUTE R., 114C.
RE-PAIRS & Ml*l%lCr---./i.
2.
2 486.. 00
59
6
,486,00
n
60
7
01/23/96
E )L.50395
'%*:%)[.Jl--IFZAY AUTO PARTS
SUPPLIES) VEHIC.-I ... E
1.38. 07
138.07
61
62
8
.
63
9
23682
01/23/96
850750
SWANE' I ... YLE'
. ......
U1411"ORMIS & COLOTHING
6 4
.!65
20.00
20.00
66
236133
O:L/.'4?,:)/96
S 5 15 75
c yc ll%lc
-S)TEMS
"
I UPPLIES 0 F F I Ei
'7. 77
67
2
0 1: ::I: CI : : : -
92.25
.1.'%*-)'0 02
68
69
3
70
1
23684
01/23/96
(360 05
1'.. 1131-4IF0
•IROG)RAM •
4. 40
71
t.jllIjF & CLO••I NG)
a 10 ". 50
n 1.24.90
73
23693
01/23/96
901 16
.300
UFTIER -Ilt"DWES11"T C)
496.28
496..28
74
75
76
FP
4
1
V0!•1i::1••IRE:2
0:I. � 1.9 / 1.0 u :I.,�
C::I:'T'Y OF MAPLE::WOOD
:' .�" �.. �.
_
Cli.11: :
-_ _..__f•�If , f•�ff� .c:; ��: .f�kfm.4�.�i
ERIOD 14
r
a
5
l::I••fE::t:� I< Ce C: K
Itll.1lYIXiI:�l�ti DATEK
VENDOR VED IDi: R :I: TE I"I
Itil.Jl`II: EER I�Irr ME:* �';ii:t"•�IPT'101
I �'E::i�l�
C.`I••II:::C: K
6
DI A
�fYlt:lE11
�
'' - 569,r .� Via. � "'.."
., ••, . _ . - --
wf:: :�y`T•�iJEthiE:: SU �..Y ��IC:�..��r�l•• �..E::�C�c�x� tYiA�..�.. TOOLS
•
�94 # 015
S
< MAI...L TOOLS
40
1,40
•• N t .
- —
I
12i
c 3AI ... I ::a" TAX
1. 84
2 f3 . :I. E.i
�,
1. ,
TOTAL CHEC
490 N7`af:3
1:3 !
f
i
I� !j
L•i
..._.__- ._�-
._.- .._ -... .. _. .. _ �.- rmm.- +„rmmw,w.- w.-,_.,,..._.. .-..++ nT.... n. rnT Twrm,., n.
,.�mm.,..__._.._.._....,,--.. - -. .....+r ..._.e.�mn,+• ,. -. _ ...
L�I
I
;St)
1
.39
I
I:
it
J
1
f
57
a�
i
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
.
RAGE 1
I
t'
Oi/26L.9.&_...
11:04._..x,.. - --
- --
__VOUCHER/ CHECK REGISTER
I
'
FOR
PERIOD 14
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
s}
t
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
71
r�
6071
01/18/
541400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE
776.00
776.00
u
to
iU
9
TREASURER-.- - -- - - - -- _ _ . - - -- ----
.. MOTOR... VEH LIC- .FEES PAYABLE - -_ _ __-__. ___
-
�.b f
12 1
- .- l3`
"
6073
01/19/96
190400
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES
DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE
612.00
612.00
L,1
16
6074
01/19/96
54140
MI STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
330.00
330.00
, ' ff
I :11
'
_. _+ X075____..0
!.19 - ►.- .__._.
- -- 414 _-
- -- Mlhthl.� _..STATE __-__STA.TE
_ DRI✓VERS -.. LIE.. FEES. __PAYABLE _-...__..
__ .. ___._ ___��.3b�. _
���. -�50_
607
01/22/96
541400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
5,847.05
5
6077
01/22/96
541400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE
494
494,50
_.TREADER - -
- -- ..__STATE
0
6079
01
541400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH
i
LIC FEES PAYABLE
L
7
7,605.20
!:}�
6080
01/24/96
520065
MCCOMBS, FRANK,, RODS & ASSOC.
P'URCHACE 2413 CARVER AVE EAST
120 V 000-00 T
1,20, 000.00
'
28
�_.
_ + ►S1__.__+011
41..9._
___-�414.00 ___..
- ---MI NN ,. -- ..STATE ... TREASURER - -__ __- - -_ -__ .. _._ -_-
- STATE_.. DRIVERS... -L -1C. -FEES_ fyAYAE LE. _-
_ _ - _ 8 2 . . 50 _
$D2_� 5 ► _._ __- .-
- -._:I
1
6082 6082
01/24/96
541400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
4,626.75
4
31
23705
01/30/96
T OYS "R " US
RE O VERFMT ON LIC C 5 0494
412.00
412.00
i
1
__.__237Q7_ . _
-01_/ 3Q/'96
_ _ _. _ _______ ____ .___
. ___ DEAC �_ . OR_�H_ _L �.. __- ___... __�_, _._ .._- . _ _ __.__.
REFUND- ----- ALAR!'_'!. -,FEE- _C502 -
�
23709
01/30/96
HENDRICKS, ZERITA & GENE
REFUND - ALARM FEE C50533
40.00
40.00
4;
3 '
23710
01/30/96
TAYLOR, MI CHELE
REFUND -- SNOWSHOEI
6.00
6.00
'
x;,,,
- - --
Y
DVERP'A ' . E - Youth th membership -
- - _ ; _
_ !.
23712
01/30/96
DELORES MARSH
VIC TEDESCO REFUND
14.00
14.00
I�t
23714
01/30/96
SHIPSTEAD, KATHLEEN
REFUND -- SWIM PRE 1
37.00
37.00
,
59
REFUND_. - UVERP.M -.T. AMD 51.1±C}D�a _. _
_ -: _ 1'�3 -. �t� _�� _ _ --
- �9 .z.40
as
�'
X3716
01 ! 30 / 96
I SD 271
OVER PAYMENT REFUND `- Youth Group
Activity 16.00
16.00
�` 1
23717
01/30/96
ISD 2144
OVERPAYMENT REFUND -Youth Group
Activity 20
. 20000
.1,
i
}' - _
2 718
01 /30/96
- - -
h1AFtK SCHWIETZ __
MEMPERSH I P' REFUND_ - _ _ . _.
_ _ _ 103 .. __.. . - - -.. _ _._._
_ _ __... 10 _
- 3_s
68
'
23720
01/30/96
ENSRUDE, MARGARET
REFUND -- AERO PUCH CARD
45.00
45.00
69
70
I
ri
23721
01/30/96
I LL I a SARAH
REFUND -- MEMBERSHIP
100 .00
100.00
7 3'
l
._...
2722
_
D1/30�96
_
Al�1DERG�71_�L, KATIE
REFUND - SWIM. REG
_:
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
+011.26/96 _ .11..0_. CHECK REGISTER .4.. _...._ _
l0l.lCHEi /
FOR PERIOD 14
PAGE 2
1
3
4
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
5
10
6
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
; i
23723
01/30/96
010290
A.K.R
FEES -- CO
160.DD
160.00
-
r
ILI
__23724
_D11301.96 __ -..:
_ _.._ __0.104,5 --
AST _.S - - - .- __ -_ -_ _.. __.,_
_PAGERS
7 K 75
li
10
PAGERS
20.
13
10
11
PAGERS
13.50
15,
1 �'
13
R
1E;y
1i
23726
01 /30/96
010470
A T & T WI RELESS SERVICES
CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES
49.58
b
lr>
_...___
:.CEL.LULAR__PHONE CHARGES._ __�_�._.��
�_...._ _._ .__x54.45 _____._ - _
�
,
CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES
21.78
111
TELEPHONE
47.94
173.75
23727
01/30/96
010575
ACE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES -- JANITORIAL
10.89
10.89
LOI�P_ .L�.lMB�ING__ &__�EAI�hJG._._.._
&._ _l'lTNCE._LEQU.IP'MENT_ -----
.______ -- - ------ _..__- _ A93...0.5~.
--
l i
REPAIRS & MTNCE . /EQUIPMENT
131.00
u
.624.05
_T.
DRYER,_
........_1 .5.0.
ELEC WORK
116.00
33
`'
El..:.EC OUTLET
116.0+0
''
,,,)
- - - - - -- ._ - - - -- _ _ _ __ _PAR-
S;_ .... __ _ . ____- __ ___- _- ____ -- _
-__ -_ _ _ _._ -- -.. _ _ .
�2 . Q6-_ _�.__ --
- _
_
3f,
2a
3 1
23730
01/30/96
021000
AMERI -DATA SYSTEM
EQUIPMENT - OFFICE
527.18
527.18
38
{>
39
,.'Il
23731
01/30/96
021200
AMERICAN FASTENER OF MN, I
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
39.78 ^ ^T
4 1;
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
137.42
177.20
! �)
3:1
''
LIB:
__ __ _
23732
-
01/30/96
__
021250
AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY
MAT SERVICE
13.05
13.85
14
I
2,5_
_.,__,A.MER I CAN...PLANNING ASSOCIATION.-, ........
SUB.SCR.I P'T I ONS . -... &
Ls,
23735
01/3+0/96
030660
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC
ANIMAL CONTROL SERV
8
808.93
I,•.
23736
01/30/96
061725
BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS
30.
30.00
23738
- - -
01/3019.
-- - BEST_ BU-Y. _: CO._w _.. _
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT-__-
_ 38. � 44 m -
1 _
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
1
2
:
.
3740
0 1301' _ .
0740
_- BLUEB_IRM _ RECOV.ERY PROORAM_ -.. --
SUH�SCI� I PT �.ONS IOWA .._I�EIhP SH �� -
- ... _ _.... - _ ._.. _ _.. _ � .�� _._ - -- -- _ ._ _ .
-- _ . - 5.00
fl �
�
- . -
- -':
23741
01/30/96
081250
FARAD RAGAN INC.
SUPPLIES -- VEHICLE
1
1,264.84
j
23748
01/30/96
180100
D.C.A.,INC.
Cif RUN 1 -19 -96
3
3:250.37
,1
23752
!I./30/96
240450
_ ..:FEED ~BETE COl+ITROLS INC �...
F�OOt_, CHEM..
CHEMICALS
1,,118
i
POOL CHEM
265.05
1
,`,
:
237
0 1/ 30 /96
300500
G & K SERVICES
U & CLOTHING
63 »
I :_,+
L,
'
-
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
66.63
130 .45
1 .
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 3
h
01/26/96
.11: 04 __.
_..
___ _ -__ ___ .. VOUCHER / REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 14
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM.
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NU MBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AM OUNT
8
23757
01/30/96
3 10250
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
R EP A I R & MAINT /VEHICLE
44.99
10
TIRES
355
400 .24
23761
01/30/96
320281
GRANDMA'S BA KERY v INC.
PROGRAM.SUPPLIES
13.75
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
12.75
15
SUPPLIES.... _- -- .--- .-- - - -._- . __. _ _ -__ _- -^
____._ . -- _i 2 7.5 _ ___. ___._
_ _ _ __ -__ --
`
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
12.75
,�
PROGRAM. SUPPLIES
1 2.75
19
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
1 75r
-
20
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
12.75
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
12.751
2r
23
PROGRAM. - -- SUPPLIES..
-_- _1 2_._? 5
24
PROGRAM S UPPLIES
1
75
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
12.75
26
• 27
0-
_
.._ .....__.,....,...._ W .................
-. -.._. __. _: _....
_ E - ,..._..........uw_ ._._.. __.. - ._:...
PROGRAM SUPPLI S
2 75
...._..._._.0 -..... i _ ... - .W4 ......._L
4.00
1 5 .
2°
A '
23762
01/30/96
320375
GRIGGS CONTRACTING INC
REPAIR & MAINT /EQUIPMENT
60.33
60. 33
31
23764
01/ 30/96
390300
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES -- EQUIPMENT
1
34
SUPPLI - EQUIPMENT
31.66
46.69
15
�6
23765
01/30/96
391525
INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE INST.,
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS
50.00
50.00
38
a9
23766_
TEMPORARY-- SERV--ICE
-- .:TEMP.__ SERVI -CE FOR RECEPT- 1- ON.I- ST_...._. -- .
- - - -_-
Qo
- _0i/30/9 __._
___- _.JEANE
_THORNE_-
41
237
01/30/
410310
KAR FL
DARE OFFICER TRA INING
78.
7$.
4.1
44
23768
01/30/96
410420
KELLER ELECTRIC INC.
REPAIR & MAINT /BLDG & GROUNDS
137.23
137.23
45�
46
47
.
23769
/3 / 96�.-
K I DSC_I ENCE ___ _ ._____.___ -- _. - -- _ - _... _.__...___SUDSCR
I P'T IONS . & MEMBERSHI -_ _ -_ __.- _ -__
-_ . _ -- -____- _ - it'd • 00___. .----- -__
-__ ___ -. 10 -• 90�._ -- -
48
- - - -41 -0751 _._
_ ___ __
49
23770
01/30/96
450450
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE
TRAVEL & TRAINING
120.00
120 .00
51
23771
01/30/96
459200
LASERQUIP
REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT
70.00
70.00
52
53
5 5
23772
01/30/96
460120
LEADERSHIP' - - - - -- _ _._. - - - - -. -- - ._.___._
_SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS----,
58
--
- - - - -_
_ ._ _ --
23773
01/ 30/96 -
460452
LEAGUE OF MINN, C ITIES
1996 D IRECTORY
153 . SD
5
,q
6n
8
23774
01/30/96
460800
LESCO INC.
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
460.08
-f1
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
460.08
920.16
63
64
23775
___.---__.___._------------
0 1/30'96
___------ ___- ___- .- ___ - - --
470700
L ILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS
AD FOR CUST SREV REP'
145r60
6 5
AD FOR P/T CUSTODIAN
91.00
67
NOT I CE P'UEsL LCAT I ON
86.47
323 . 0 7 __....
�W 68
_
.. ......
. __..... _ _ .. _. .... ___..... . _ ..
_ ..._ . __.._
_LEGAL .
.:......__ .. W...
_ -
23776
01/30/96
500300
M.A. ASSOCIATES
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
32.42
32.42
t
72
23779
01/30/96
530500
MENARDS
SMALL TOOLS
61.68
61.68
73
74
f �_
23781 _.
01/30/96
531660
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL _
. NOV SAC .. _..... ti ... - .- ......
14 �, 69�' ,. �t� _..
_ -._� __: �. _�_: �
�_ 76
(� VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
� - ___ VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
0 1/26194 ' .. -.11 � 0� .._.. .
FOR PERIOD 14
2
3 VOUCHER/
PAGE 4
. i
9
4
CHECK
C HECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
5
u
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT f,
!�
'
DEC SAC
92
107 �
10
iy
-_ _ 2 7 .__.
!_ _ ..___
. _. -. -- 540175 __
-___. MIDWEST- COLA B (ITTLING C
. Q..-
MDSE...FOR ..RESALE_._..__._ __- _- - -__ -- __ -- ___ -- -- - - - -_-
___ _.___ _-- _7i4.IID__
11
_714:.00 -__
11
1
;
23783
01/30/96
541440
MINN. STATE TREASURER STAX
DEC SURTAX
4,,058.51
43058.51 III
1J
23786
01
551350
MN ORNITHOLOGISTS` UNION
SUBSCRI PTIONS & MEMBERSH
20.00
20 t
18
20, _
1J
20.00 20
:
23789
01/30/96
630010
NAAEE MEMBERSHIP
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS
45.00
21
45.00 23
'I
23791
01/30/96
630275
NATIONAL 4 -H COUNCIL
BOOKS -
12. 20
12.20
/��
3
2 -...
� 1 j, / � j � / L ■
_. - s..�lc. ..,A i_..__... ...
63Q
. _. ._._._.____...NII
(/ ^{� I E ■/yam{. T L yj ■�.i �y /■ ICE
-.1 .D .3 O .T.i'•
U L j H G
PUB I S S I Nra ._. _.... .. _�._____....._- _.- •___._.... .. .__ _. ..... ..... _...
_
23794
01/30/96
640810
NEWMAN SIGNS
SIGNS & SIGNALS
1 265.86
a
I j
1 :,ll
23795
01/30/96
660800
NORTH ST. MAUL CITY OF
UTILITIES
386.44
;1a
.,
UTILITIES
218029
604..73 31
,>
l
23799
01/30196
681151
OFFICEMAX
SUPPLIES -- OFFICE
34.70
34.70
�....
_ . 23800
01/30/96
_ ..._ _..
700900
_,.... -
PARK SUP'P'LY INC.
._ ._. .. _ _ .. ..
- _ ._.,... ., _ _ .. _ _ _ - _....... -...
SUPPL
_.._ SUPPLIES
29.14
29.14
23804
01/30/96
751350
RINK SYSTEMS INC.
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
157.38
157.38 13
23805
01/30/96
780300
S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS I
S UPPLIES - OFFICE
111.81
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
70.51
6
,.
OFFIC
SUPPLIES -- OFFICE
9.37
1
SUPPLIES -- OFFICE
10.52
SUPP'L I FS. OFFICE:
SUPPLIES -- OFFICE
. 37.72
1i
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
32. 63
_. _
..._.
..._. ...--- _....._ ._,_ _.._ _
SUPPLIES OFFICE
12 .B 4
'.;
SUPPLIES -- OFFICE
9.74
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
15.43
454045
'G)
dll
23806
01/30/96
790200
SCHRICKEL _
CONCERT IN THEATRE
2,649.60
2,649.60.
, 1ts.
_23807
0 1 / 30 / 9 _.._._
820600 -
_ _ _ .,
SNAP` -ON TOOLS
ANA I NTENANCE MATER I AL
34.03
�
23808
01 /50/96
831505
SPECIALTY RADIO SERVICES
HT 1000 PORTABLE
2
_
1-�T . iC�t�O PORTABLE
702.90 _ .__ _ . _ _
_ .._._ __. _ 2,820
;!
23811
01/30/96
842800
STATE SUPPLY COMPANY
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
165 .97
i
i
GAUGES
42.5►1 _
!
_ 208.48 .,..... ; i
23812
01/30/96
843320
'STENCIL CUTTING & SUPPLY CO.
FEDISTAL S IGNS
336.54
336.54 A
9
' rd V
VOUCHRE2 C
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD -
PAGE 1
01 /.26/. 96 .._�__. 1
1_1_�D4
_ _ . V
VO:UCHER /CHECK.
6
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 2
i
11: 04
--
VOUCHER /CHECK. REGISTER:........ -
__01/26/96,
FOR
PERIOD 12
;J
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
5
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
7
8
23749
01/30/96
230900
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
DUPLICATING COSTS
147,.35
9
1n
DUPLICATING COSTS
5.15
,ice
DUPLICATING _ _COSTS _..._._ . _..... _ . ....___ -.. -
_._92 C)8 ...._..._._ .. -
.. _.. __.-. _-...�._ -... _....__....
_
_
DUPLICATING COSTS
208.1. ,
1 n 14
DUPLICATING COSTS
133.68
15
_DUPL I CAT I NG
16
DUPLICATING COSTS
344.69
t7
18
DUPLICATING COSTS
198.18
i,19S.92
19
20
-`-
23750
_............ ...._,..._.__ ...__...
01/30/96
_....._....._.._.....
231570
. _-....._......_
EDITH MILLER FLORISTS, INC.
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
51.43
51.43
21
?,2
?.3
.__23751 _ _
X7.1_ / : /___9_b____.___
-___ 2.5_ .1.50 ___._ __EP
_AI.tDI_0 VISUAL F .__..IhIC_._ - - -._ ___----- ___._.___.
_...
SHARFs__V.I DEO_ PROJ E.C.TOR _- RENTAL - - -___ _- _ - -_
15(� ..00R_ - --
___ L 50� (�0
2n
- 75
237 54
0 1/30/96
3�"J �. 238
GARVEY CO MMUIN I Cp'1` I ONS
PUBLIC RELATI PLANK I NG 2 HR
150.00
i 50 o0
26
27
28
23755
01/30/96
301750
GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT
TELESCOPING LIGHT POLE- -L HEAD
2
2,9$2.00
?9
30
31
i.
23756 _.
01/301
.0196
___Q2900
_�
LEhlWO[]DI_NGLE.W._OOD:_ -_ _._.- ____._.BOTTLED - WATER___. -- ____ -- __ . _ --
32
/96
GOB- EV I SPOSA�..
DEC 95 RECYCLING !�
, b
_7
34
35
0
PROGRAM SUPPL I ES
__ �__._....�..
,_ �- _ _ _ _
23759
01./30/96
310710
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.
FEES FOR SERVICE
21.00
2100
.30
nu
o
, !
23760
OkACE g DU AINE .
FEES FOR SERVICE
1 762 .50
:
I T62.50
�►
n1
42
n3
o
01/30/96
320200
z .
23.761.....
01/30196
32+ 281... _ _.,
. GRANDMA . S BAKERY, _ _.I NC .
PROGRAM SUPPL I ES.___ _._.._.._. _ ._. y _.. __ _:
an
45
„ _.._-
.. _ .
PROGRAM! SUPPLIES
12.75'
' r,
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
12.75
41.25
4
48
23763
01/30/96
390100
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL I� I ST . #622
PUBLISHING
55 .8T
49
so
PUBLISHI
266.53
,,
.ti.. __..._._... _ .._...._.. _._ .. ,__ .._... .._.. _ .. _.. _ _. -..
SUPPLIES
59
53
i"
23775
01/30f96
470700
LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS
PUBLISHI LEGAL NOT 10 -12
212.52
212
n
55
•1.1
23777
01/30/96
511200
MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE CO.
FEES FOR SERVICE
545.28
�, „
57
58
59
11
,
23778
0
.
_ STER____... _ _.. _ ..
MART I N--MC ALL 1 ._..-.
PERSONNEL
►�►�
so
;.
_.,
23780
.
01/30/96
531400
METRO SALES I NC.
REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIP'MENT
X5.00
6
63
sn
r .
REPAIR &- MTNCE_._ /EQU I PMENT _ - _ - - - -- .. - -
. - - -- 246.- _26__.___.____
X41.
r5
23784
01/30/96
542 125
MINNESOTA DEPT OF LABOR & IND
BOILER INSPECTI
30.
30 - 00
66
67
__-
(.._
23785
01/30/96
542130
MINNESOTA ELEVATOR, INC.
REPAIRS & MTNCE. /BLDGS.
80.00
jl
Vi �!
REPAIRS & MTNCE . / BLDGS .
280.91
3b+� . 91
1 �
2
...
23788
01/30/96
570090
MOGREN BROS.
U=-CART CONCRETE
80.00
50.00
,.,
23790
01/30/ 6 .......
_ 630033
N I S,_ COWMUN I CAT_ ONS _.....
.
_. PROVIDE /,INSTALL_. CABLE __.
365 .00
..._._.� __.�.
F
-
l
-,
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 3 ,
011261.96,___11:_0
/CHECK REGISTER
1
FOR
PERIOD 12
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
!NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT �
I
IINSTALL J CATS NET CABLES
1
1,365.00
. 630950--_. ---
-. -- I NCORP.ORA.TEI
272._5Q_
- - --
1
I'I
23795
01/30/96
660800
NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF
UTILITIES DEC
1,414.64
1,414.64
23796
01/30/96
661175
NORTHERN AIR CORP
HANG REGISTERS
183.,00
REPAIRS & MTNCE . /EQUIPMENT
3
3 , 4 53.26
23797
01/30196
661750
NORTHERN STATES POWER
UTILITIES 98
_ 99.
UTILITIES 345
98.93
`
1677 _ _ _
UTILITIES 2253
242.
UTILITI 2880
144.25
6_
-- --
UTILITIES 2104
9.52
875.57
23
23798
01/30/96
670950
_ , ... -... ...
NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC
_
PUBLISHING
}
5 869.
'
POSTAGE
1, 400.40
PUBLISHING
94 5.00
POSTAGE
100.00
PUBLISHING
187.56
9
s,
23801
01/30/
711 525
PHYS I O- CONTROL CORP s.
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
* 121045 �
� 121.45
23 802
01/30/96 -_ -_
. 741
- RA MS EY ..�CLINIC - --- - -_ - -- _ _.___.._..._ _ -- ...
� PRE-EMPLOYMENT I CAL_.E_
1772.00
-
X34
PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
256.00
a
'
PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
93.00
a
PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
_.. - . - . .. P � . .. . _ _.. _.
84.00
_ T _. _ _ ._._._.- _ _ -_ � �
610..00
.. � - - _ r_ � _
'>
23803
01/'30/96
741600
RAMSEY COUNTY
DATA EXTRACTION
97.90
- - - - -- .__._. -.
_ Shoulder Pave Agreement /K.el-1 e -r__.Pkw-
y_- _._
Shoulder Pave Agreement /Carver
Ave. 11,342.00
{
POSTAGE
85.92
18,383.82
r ;
23809
01/30/96
840405
ST. PAUL CITY OF
I.N LINE RACE ST PAUL FEE
112.
{
OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 94--04
600..00
t
__-
. - - - - --
OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 94--12
2 ,100.00
I
OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 94--10
150.00
OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS„ 94 _
_ 1 5Q0 0 ..
'
OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 95--06
1, 350 . +CEO
OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 95-05
600.00
REPAIR Vic. MA I NT / UT I L -I TY __ _
6 026.21
14 2 t
23810
01/30/96
841140
ST. PAUL WATER UTILITY
UTILITIES
4.76
;.
UTILITIES
17.46 ....._..
UTILITIES
89.40
UTILITIES
31.74
UTILITIES _ __ ..
90.45
y
VOUCHRE
�6 / 96
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
_.. VOUCHER /CHECK.. REGISTER
F}AGE 5
i
.__�� .._.... _......
FOR PER 14
' . -.-
VOUCHER!
_...w.w
'
CHECK'
..,
CHECK
VENDOR
.., _._. _..
VENDOR-
_Y.:....,.... .
. _ .:._.. ...... _ . ... _. _ .. ,..__..t._-
ITEM.
.�..:.:....:. ..__ u...4.._ .._._...,.. _ .....r.._._....
_..._......_.._.. ....
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
_.:._. __.
CHECk:
'
23813
01/30/96
850395
SUNRAY AUTO PA RTS
SUPPL — VEH
A MOUNT
AMOUNT
- - -
SUPPLIE VEHICLE
1370:46
_.._._-
SUPPLIES -- VEHICLE
56.90
$
i_. �!5.
__
...__
_ .....11.96
___SUPPLIES
ES
218.07
2 5
01 /30/96
860305
T.J.T. � SHIRTS
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
---
,
....._
''!
_
-SMALL-T—SHIRTS y -.� 4_.W..__ _ .. _ ..�
931.9 �
,
,
.S.r_.8. 2
23817
01/30/96
E380550
7RI COUNTY LA W ENFORCEMENT
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIIBS
2
2
20
23815
Di l l96 :
. .r_
Slo!20 �i
— _ _ . _-
U 5 WEST` CELLULAR INC
TELEPHONE __ . -- ---- -- - - -- —_ _ ._
5th . DD
�
50.00 z
�
x
` 8i r 3�
^I
1 81 . 3 2 .
_REIMOVAL.. �-_-.. EhlOVAL.
2(
24
�382 1
01/30/96
9 i i 33 5
VIKING AUTOMAT I C SFR I Nl�LER
ir to ink,ler
Repa �p Head
z`
9(
25
26
23823
tai /30/96 `
--- ----
937000
- -- -- --
WEAROUARD __—_
UN I FORMS & CLOTHING -
.147.
�
. 78 1
x
z7
U I F H I
N U NI F ORMS & CLOTHING
i77,44
z3
z�
_W_ ....._......r
23824
.
01/3 0 /96
. Y. __...
��..�.... �...-.._.�_...Wyy
WEATHER WATCH,
CH ,
..__ _ .....
WEATER WATCH SERVICE
59 99
r
��� #�
..._.......-._....y.- ..._....- _._ ..
' 10
2382 ,
../ l_9
!9 4th.5�DD
IE$ER_--.TROSETH
338.
DD
37
338.00
38
31
..._lNC _m
_ - -- REPAIR . -_ & , _ MA I NT. EQU I.P'MENT.____-_..__._
4.5
39
33
23826
01/30/96:
'950325
WORD PERFECT 1"MAOA��NE
SUBSCRIPTIONS P T NS & MEMBE
$SC I O MEM$E I P'
_.
_L - -�5 4n
41
a2+
_�.y --
_._ ...... __..
S 43
35
_.
44
36
TOTAL CHECKS
46
3 7
_
- - -__ _ - - --
289 47
48
3(�
49
401
51
41
_..,. _ ..... _... _
_ _...__ 52
ri
1
3
56
44 57
4i
46 ____ .:- W w. 59
471 60
t1t:JlJt:�N'lF�:t : :: '
t:'• :1:'I Y
OF* IYIAF:'!. «I :. *W(:)i:JI)
.j
1 .. l��:��:. :l
{��'/02/
]..f. u : }'r
�i., lJi.J i "l1::.1'L.� t.J1 "tl::.i., 1 •. �•
S 1 E :.
I`.o
v 0 1aCI.- IEr1:::�
r:>
3
a
I�r�'
I�•tl.11YtI�l : ::F�
t�lr•`�lY1l ::
.,..,..
I)1 : ::;: 1 P T :1: OI
t� IY1 i:�l.11t l'r
AIV :)+•JNT
6
.w$.. f,,a� „� l - .�.�.ilJf..+�
�. .G ,?K-- .�...-
.___ ...,.- ._.- ..I�..�.l..R��.#s: � t �1�.w1�w. -.. .. A... ttt..
.
• i.�
9
i�, )C:�: 7
0 2/ 06 / 9 e.)
(� ., f r 1 1 r 1, -I
Y' .�!' G .!• 1'1.1.1"i 1" R }� O
• 1 • l;: bi ` � ti
Y v +�
t::::�i. O REI := !Jt IZ)
�
00
J �r•
� f. 00
�
02/06/
Jt:71••Il' 1 i!•• ll��lE :A. DE: :ICI
I'C ::ICE :: it::t:! FtiI : ::F °IJ1AI)
70
70.
13
14 1
... .....
:
�;� }
. e l)S1f....,R .,
a. Llf2s - .f4�.
...__.. _ 'a. 1. .fit_ "lt : -s:t ;'��,.�{ �«. _.. _ ., __.
,JG E:..S.e
17
231
02/06/96
GRA NDVIA J Si BA1E1::.1' Y . .I.I - w
,+
1 ,., ..� ., ., .;� �. ' :'.
14 .� �. I f l'�f f s.Y IJ!' I !. 1. I::{
. >.Y
. .» �.
12 ,. l� , Y
rti r
1�
t :
19
23862
02
tir•'ii:l.
111% 'I':I:'r'!.a'1 "1 : :: !�'l':)l�ti l':it:�l��'t''i:�1�t'r'i : :: :!:l�lll.1
i::l:)t�l c•�:• c:
i~ :f:f I1 :::Jf} ,: }i'• ,i:Jl : :. SE :
Il:1�1� ! ;
+. }�
5 „
Y �:y
1 . 0 ., �f0
,.
01.00
1
}
t �::;i #:3t:3 �:'.
o �.•:/ ��{`: }/96
-
��+'�220 :I.
_
1Y1 •i.1 1 A I'll _I,1411 lyl
�� 1•''O .. t. t.l
CO.
!: °c:� 't.! "' �' ' � •' ''• �
!� l : :.....Y � I•+, ,.�l :: I is i..l: � o l i day Con e:r t
.,,,<•„
J. ;+ f:�:. 3 „ 00
,.,, «Y,,;.
1. {.,,. },.� 00
i_';l
<'G
�
� .
.7 .
2 (:} { .Y ' 2
0 d:: ! 0 t: / {'
} ,�F,
f � J {" 1 '�
{:} t. �t:� ,.
� {'1 •.�. t i '4
I I :1. r'I : :. ! «.:f: 'r' :.... I : :: hl'r <E :: F� r' �", :F I tt 1 E :: t I'
• t:ti "� t; :�• •, - ._...�..,.._...�.,r._•+• --
I� ' E :: E :... t :i . A . R . E . Pr
_-_ j � - - - --- ----'^•--
:I. N .�:.{ � N {
-^ - --- -
1, 2 00.00
: s
u
v :
.. . ....... .
���
82.5
32
Y lJI••'!• •'I... •t. EM OFF .1. t<`J
y OZ
.;3
r1.
s
w
»
{ . y �� .r , 115 J
d ::}
eta
i5 4:
�..., }c}
o�..�. }/
{. ,iy,.} �C�
,. }!.1! I1 t.1. .l.i�1,.}1 t...t., r .I. l.11�! .. }1...14�J �. t.Jl:.. \.} f...
t' 1._I::.,;} !" t.l! -� f
.;7
,_+ fay }.� ..}o
I) FZE :: VE ::I�IlJE :: EA ... E :: i:; N PE :R1" I :i: i'
3 JJ ry ` : ri
�
�i1*.v)90f.)
02/06/96
901.,. 00
Lil•''!•'1...!•+, IYI.I.II''l� EEI%3 %T {< }�`ILSK"'.} !•'•t.I
2.
It1'r'
!: IT 'Extractor VAC &
f l
,� ) J�`
. ,1 :1. N \ :�:•J
i
�
_.
...-attachments/
S an%-tlz er- -- Eqcx zp�t- --� --
- -a '� :1_,, fad}
�+ 1. ,
I`.o
"I
I
60F'.7 01/26/96 I-Al.400
C)
3
VIQ*TC R VE:Rl FE*•S PAYAEA ... EK
3 9 1. 115 0
C?* 1. E: w C) C) 1)
6080
F A, G E .I.
:1.90400
or- 11.1 A 'T U F%' A L.o -F I- %.,P
DIqR S )* AYA
ll 44
746.00
v 0 1.)
Fl E R / Cl 1 C* K R E C 1 C * T 1"' Fa
Y5
6092
ff
0.1. 1/2 9 9 6
Aj
6 0 E:9
01/26/96
722200
1 Q R F'[ I C.) 1)
I /J. 2/96 F"/R D E 1) U C" *T* 10 M
14.1060.19
-14
115 414
TREWS)"URER
1 E:
IVI(')*T*( v E F1 L 1 C F'E.T BI
.0
-.io
1/12/96 F*-*/I:Z DE: DUCT 1 011
E) c " 12 .. 61
) A6
4�
6090 0:1. /**9/96
6622'�
1%. . -:13
ST E.' A Il K I INN E % 0 TA
V 0 U 11.1 I F%l
1. 4.:. 07 3... • 26
A
l/26/96 P/R DEDUC 1311
T C
2�' 07" 98
CA AMC-
63
609t"-'l
01.1"29/96
1/2 6/96 F'/R C
-M
4
r
-L 7 58
1AUIVIBIER
DATE*
I I t. j I "113 E." 1:
IAANE".
D1::*ll3*C'R".I: 1:: 3: OIA
ANCAMAT
Y i
5
6096
01/29/96
------- -
4:1. 7 0* J. AC'A' 1 .
BA A K
& 1/26 FVR
9000000
?CJQ 00
7
6097
0:1.x`.:'9 9 6
(Z' 4 3 1%5 0 ("1
W*l'.':*lC'*C)I%IC`rl--I DET'T. OF* C� :i : : :~,Ii:::1- it.1!•.::
Jt')Il 191?6 W:I:(:' %W l'
7,5
:x:1...1. / 7 L
8
0:1 0 5) 6
6084
0:1 2 6
ti 4 1. 4 0 0
ITUAN. <%3TATl::: *T*RI:::All3*t.JIRI:: R
MOTOR VED-1 I... lCe r�•(:::I::..; ! ��'�'��1il:�l f:�:
�.� . 5;
-59.12
6. 1539.. 1 2
9
60E.,
0:1. /2,*. -96
01 8*11 0
REAAET:
(S) U F P L. I ..:. c- 1 -:- ( . 1 tyl I ::- J Y J I -:-
ENT
r:
12
is
c% 1 -: : 1 :� V
4890
9.72
14
3L ;. TF
lF TE 1 QU IE %
T
F'F C) C*I- ID 1 3 77
TFAVEA T R (-VC hIl hI C*%
9, 3. .0
E
lei
"Fl KIS VH
J-1 F Ell
2,
19
20
0 E : : c' I ::. ( . tj - I ::. I Y IF :
12.. 00.
121
%
F'RC)C3*RAITI SUF'F'I ... 1 E*S
12.01
22
13 56
T _
26
lG
"RCK*'RAPlI I E S
KS
E. _-L
_E vi
:17
FCAZ RIEISALE
F'C)lS*T*r.*)GI::-
3., 4 B
29
A
3 F a L 1 ,
o C i j: A t
10. 66
F'O'S TAGE-
33
0 C'A' F A t(I FE. S
HT"
3 99
, •.,,. j :
-5
34
6086
0.1/26/9
115 4 1. .4 0 0
'B)TATE: TRIENE)"URIER
DF�1VIER(S) L.-IC A Y A F*4 I ... E.
299.50
299..50
37
18,
"I
I
60F'.7 01/26/96 I-Al.400
C)
3
VIQ*TC R VE:Rl FE*•S PAYAEA ... EK
3 9 1. 115 0
139
2 91 0
6080
01/26/96
:1.90400
or- 11.1 A 'T U F%' A L.o -F I- %.,P
DIqR S )* AYA
'746. 00
746.00
Y5
6092
ff
0.1. 1/2 9 9 6
Aj
6 0 E:9
01/26/96
722200
P., I..: ,. R A
I /J. 2/96 F"/R D E 1) U C" *T* 10 M
14.1060.19
-14
115 414
TREWS)"URER
1 E:
IVI(')*T*( v E F1 L 1 C F'E.T BI
.0
-.io
1/12/96 F*-*/I:Z DE: DUCT 1 011
E) c " 12 .. 61
) A6
4�
6090 0:1. /**9/96
6622'�
1%. . -:13
ST E.' A Il K I INN E % 0 TA
1/26/96 Fs/R • E 1) U Co"'Y'l ON
1. 4.:. 07 3... • 26
A
l/26/96 P/R DEDUC 1311
T C
2�' 07" 98
63
609t"-'l
01.1"29/96
1/2 6/96 F'/R C
J-4:21073,26
5 6 I'tj..50
'
6091.
01. "9/96
6: 1. 0 %5
U.C.. FUI%lD
41*11 QTR 199.`5 1.)I%IE:*t- CeOlVIF
407.30
4071.30
Y5
6092
ff
0.1. 1/2 9 9 6
11 1-4 STATE:
DRIVIERE L. C FT: -O'Ei F'AYABLE-
E
��Y
630. 00
6*%*.)Q.. 00
tl
'� 6 C) 9,2;
(D:I./29/*(`6
115 414
TREWS)"URER
1 E:
IVI(')*T*( v E F1 L 1 C F'E.T BI
.0
-.io
.966. 50
CO
6094
01/29/96
7 2:`2 2 0 0
R.. A..
FVR DIET III F'OR • F , 1: Ll C C) v
3 •.'s 0 0
333.00
63
609t"-'l
01.1"29/96
5 i 0 L -`5 0
MIA 1' 1...t.
Al"IE W I LLIAMS JAIA :1.996
r
-L 7 58
7.. 11
6096
01/29/96
------- -
4:1. 7 0* J. AC'A' 1 .
BA A K
& 1/26 FVR
9000000
?CJQ 00
6097
0:1.x`.:'9 9 6
(Z' 4 3 1%5 0 ("1
W*l'.':*lC'*C)I%IC`rl--I DET'T. OF* C� :i : : :~,Ii:::1- it.1!•.::
Jt')Il 191?6 W:I:(:' %W l'
7,5
:x:1...1. / 7 L
6 0 9'�.':)�
0:1 0 5) 6
MOTOR vl:::I-i LA:C% 1 ::- I : FAYA131J.H.'
3., 75 3. 7 ; , : ��
; . , � : .,, . 3.. 7%5
3
j (
VOUC1.H
OF ITIAF'L..E::I!J( .. 1 1, 1
F t A C F , 2)
02/()2/`
.I..I. ;; 44
v0l.l t .rl•'I1: :.1'+. r l..•1 °11.. 1: E- 3' 1.,.} Y 1 .:.1:z
i1,
1
i
L 1 f
tart Il.:c:rt.
4�1
• rE
.;
t:.I•'lI t:::� .
_...._
: °I�IXft:Jl�ti._ _ ...
_��M �1It _ ..
:: I'�E
.11:— C R
14I1. VII!• {ER
DATE*
FIAIVIE*
ELM. : *1%3C :C 1°`'T' :l: CAIrl
AIVICA
(- Emvi N T
W
r'
s
' �
6099 - --
-0:1. /� y {� /(� 6
- - -_ t 11. ��•�: 0
IYI:I:1111-111. f: *T'�11•I : :' �Y•rtit::1)S) I::E -�;
- - - - -- -
s:�' ; • ti: :•• {:, ., . {:•• ::• :1
,.} rn t r: Jf�i, t v E: : :i�, r ,�r Y�1Z•I...r»
+} •s 3 ,:• 1
•. 1:•
8
r
6 1.00
0.1. /
�� :as�0 .i. 0
1... A140% ., P1.1 t.rt
ADD ' I... RE::.Ivl .I. B t.r .E. 'T' FT .111% 1.1/1.
1.1. 3 n ;it :3
1..1.
11
j101
'1'
6 .t. {r .I.
01/31
I:t�A' � tlf'�
,. / .L � , r ,r
Y .. t {. :. ...:.� .. (:; :.'.....-
1 1.I. I IN .. , :} T A T F.. f I �E :.(1,.al.)t ,I : :. 1,
� t. ., ..,. ..� 0 . _. _. ............._.... _....... _... _....................
Ir LA46 � Cti1::.I" t.lRT
,_....__... .. ,...�._......_. ....W_......._..__W__.
4 .} x •, T 5
__.
414% }3 9 .1 1
.,...._..._....
" 11I
14
J-
;
i
6 1. 02
_ - -- - _ - - --
0 1/ 3 1 /96
_-
54
1Yi :i 14 11 „ r:� TRE::n:: }t.tF�ETZ - -- _
x�r:: . ..
r:t! F it t �- � 1.49 RI ::_*P :l1 : ;% " {•
_ _.- _ - -- _ _ - - - -_ _ - --
'�
_ .. _ _
3 9 63 1 , * • ,5 0
-
-
1
'`'
`
�
:�':':;0 ", 59
� . -` 0c� -/ rP �s
t+;! � :1: t :�`Y' :1:1 ::: 1 :.:I: "fit is t y
-
t:V
t �l.�,I. 1 t:sl t"y►�1: :4 l:�� : :I�` "l.Il�l�}
'�;�'
.. ..N
`.tip, �
17
18
'
,.. »..�r
19
`1
2: }f`:3tA0
02/06/96
01.0230
f1., tj N 1 %3 1 Kl::. t::t:J11TI1•• (-11
'
3:1. N 20
,/ :I... 20
1171
22
4 . 0 2 /06 /96
� :1. r rS �
► 'T' X1:1: FZE::I..�F;: {,s :3 t yN �r �,� :1: t:::r :_t :�
•I : ::�.,.I ::l •I'•IC�1�iE ::
�-. --.��
H �' �
�4
34, 05
25
;'��
'T'I. "L..C..I:'I •It �htE..
24.7
.t. 2 N 06
27 �
111
_. - 4
�(
'' ""r `'y
�:•••. }042
0�
' /�} } / i
? :I. � i }
"' �
..� t :1I..
A DAM I Yt + {. � ::• ::: `• :� • • :; t. t
�A ,} I 1 , T �! ! T t 11%1 r /.
.. t :'
I I 1 �#� ! +.r'
.» ... .� #:f I : : :z' .i: t :: i...
f" ,..`. i
`231
„
F' E:r::: F•'OR {:aL•: :F-,V .1. E:.
� 7 .. �•'.�}
31 �
24
_...
___._.. _
__
p- .
I °'L•:.1::.;:3 l••'t.l i : c i1..1'tiE1.1. t.il;:
%-v 6
•-
J
I' :! E'•• O R ,:, E. F +, �J .I. t.r .
L:
.1. % :) 7 n J. �.}
3 a� i. F ii 01
3
7F
14
l2,7
`
ay:? 'Y
_ # �;.�..,�!a
_...._. __,...
''� (
/>'
_.�.. _ :y.
1' '�Yi'
,��.�, :a)I�I.I�I�"ti...
_.. ._ ...... _ r _
.:t #: :." :'t '� • {:' •' t • , :'�
C`Cli i #"i#I.. �. }I...1�'1:t.. ,.} :I:! X11 t: �I 71 E
.»
_ _. _ _ .._s .� _ w ... �. _._ .._ .. _. _ W ._ - .... t
I : :. tt., . _ is tit( __. W _. _ _... ....._.WW .- - _
,:• r; .:+�
_ y _. _. y /.:�' __�.._
••.,» :,,
'j
_. �,�..
35
!'�
�.'.: E�i�.r.•�
02/06/96
{�r��:'.t� 00
�1{: SM N OF* . T . F .. ;f`►1 N CY1: F 1 t::E: :F - t:�F t�Il�i
:L cr'(r'{ {� I�t.al:::t:.}
'�
.e..0.. 00
20 ., 00
'
39
r :ti :v i:'
t y f,
+,S
ti / �t` / c•
art ,»
.. « ., .� .� .�� �, .r.� ..,
{•
y } • (. r j + y} {. {. `' J4
( S % c % t'1:1:
r . ..� ..,. ..,.
� } { r�
....
._. .._.
___
--- .
41
f
i
I
f...,. O �,. t
,
�r2 06 T 6
1
Lr..SI�'•Y,. 0
j y!!�t
A. t I r.Y � .} .}
a t t:r . �:} �� .� N
:1.� I' i "l
t
{' {' {:' ,
.1. }' is} , :} 1 11: ti.? �..r E , .L F T .I. .7t I
�' n �
{ -y�� ` y
J` ,..► ! !
!32!
I
42
I f
ri:`.': 8. 6
+w 2 /06 /i�6
+� 61 60
E ARS - 4 F:.I l�; �: i�iF..E:.t•'-:.0 NO CO n
.: N p r ,» t y
L:.Iti G :I: NE:... R.1 FIc:E • l:� ; � •� #° ..t y,' :. �:�
.
,�
_. . _ ..
` 1 • ( I N
44
f'11
45
3s
2 )04 7
0 2/06/96
0 7�;;,�:'00
if L.UE:: BE: ::I...L :f. [:E :: t:�t•�EAIYI f :01.
IYII�IS :.. t� -t:li� I �t :::t:��"il..t : ::
1. f)c�} n ��(�
:I ���} .. ����
46 �
47
,36
4
23
021 0''6196
.L .I: � s #.T{
C M ) ,. i N .L MAG I I�It.� s. }Y,.� Y E "IYI,.}
�C,C)E' .I. P: � L »F..,�1,. E
4 ,� � N .�.• �
+�r t.� � N �'. �
38
50 i
5 1
3�
'
2 �:;
0
1 t #:3.y {�
t. ".t�'�"T "t.,t.l
c:�� ::•t::ti 'c % .... E. C`!
1
•r
r y • r
•
40
( S)UE I I...1 E:.cx .... VL•:.FI.l. CL. I.:'
2 9 . 52
53
n '
i
# :31. 1 °'1 °'1...1:1 : ::c% VI :�I i :I: � %I...1 : :.
� 1 0
''
..} �c....
5a
55
I
'z
; ) ! 1F''f ' L l'"' {, ti.�t 1'1. CA.. E:.
2
56
43
57
144
':y':" !;�
�. 38 .. 0
':� +C'
O.c..J�C ?6 � 6
+;t :+► + ~.r;
,1..,. }��,I..80
:: :ti r. v .� , f'`
I... ► I.:: ,. I :t•� :I. I Ii• I it ,1f T t.r ..y11I �i AY I. I I
... «..
DOOR I Zit. D
+;ti +;y (• �:•'
1. �..2 ... 5
r °. +•� �[ r.:
:E. ,:..,�. 0 9 ,.1
$8
4!i
�
46
2 3El.51.
02
23:t.6B
TOM I :.A<(%3*'Y *RAl _1ID
vE::1•'l1CeL.r AL.I ... f:)WAI%lC*A : ::
' . i 20 �
�. n d.. iF
15 2 0,
- \. N d.. S.•
47
62
63
4$
230'52
02106/96
�'�L � I. ;yr
t::.l ... ;:)IVI�.It'�I::� (f l.lf', f .l. t.;
IYtI) 1::• n 1"•f`.lI'4 E';t: :.:iAI...I...
: }. } I .1. 0 2
,'�, a :L .. f3 : �
64
49
�65
50
51
2
02 /0 6/96
''' 02
�:. c�� ,�,�:. t :3c�}
Y (:'� ... ',' � .. t . y
r 1:C l:..Y ,. }t::.!"�'� I ,, L 11C ..
�. •�, i, �,' •1 •:� f.` µ
(
,. }f:::1, r :r (
C%E .,.y 1 TO �',,�' �..��/ S�t�i
yy �
:L 6 ,, ;.�+ti+ r.� .. { �
16, , �:i� its N 00
5 '
,cy, ?�: , :�r
02/06/96
,t �� 'l. {�+:
1 �1*1 I "11� I" 1. »1 ".I�1 I" 1`!E';
;: }lJt "'1 »'1....1.1::.: } .... 1::.t:�1.1.1 I I'll �
ti �8 rl 7 rti
:;r � `,. ,� % '1
,
68
5.
{,
i
`
<:'.
0 1 2 /06/96
3005C110
% ) fy, i< 1 %: E
1.1N .1.1 C)R I'll S r::: t.: L.CYY" I-1.1'.FICJ
1.1 FIT 1'• F.'sIYI1 # : CI...t.l � I "I I'tt: �
6
1. :1. 1`3 9
72
7 3
�Ft
.E.
"�.
7a
U1"I:I: F , 0Fe IVI" ... t:rl... i:i'fl•• 11%It +
57 ,75
1
N� ICE S-1b"1U.
240 44 3,
770.00 770.00
DUES-
ooe�� o��oa/va
2 i:*"*?':: 02106196 53 : 1 .300 zwapscTzow asPvzc 1:':'('%
249
'ao
s, zwc' s�
^^
1::: I_ ��T n� ----'---'——
ozz ~___..,~, .^~~.. ,,^=, "12. 00.... ' � ��p ao
� / , '
�� .-COUNG-1-L. — — -����� p[��_.____
��7n nz�� � A ��ro� �' m�. �� � �n pn �' '
---- ^ zmn.pn �
nw�ao� nzw I'll .uspT.o� Msm-T*-swvzmC) Iv, --1.`--oo-----
Q
�����
AMOUNT
61, 82
21 19
60
02/06/96
1680
360.00
360..00
21
00. Oo
27
22
ooe�� o��oa/va
2 i:*"*?':: 02106196 53 : 1 .300 zwapscTzow asPvzc 1:':'('%
249
'ao
s, zwc' s�
^^
1::: I_ ��T n� ----'---'——
ozz ~___..,~, .^~~.. ,,^=, "12. 00.... ' � ��p ao
� / , '
�� .-COUNG-1-L. — — -����� p[��_.____
��7n nz�� � A ��ro� �' m�. �� � �n pn �' '
---- ^ zmn.pn �
nw�ao� nzw I'll .uspT.o� Msm-T*-swvzmC) Iv, --1.`--oo-----
Q
�����
'ao
s, zwc' s�
^^
1::: I_ ��T n� ----'---'——
ozz ~___..,~, .^~~.. ,,^=, "12. 00.... ' � ��p ao
� / , '
�� .-COUNG-1-L. — — -����� p[��_.____
��7n nz�� � A ��ro� �' m�. �� � �n pn �' '
---- ^ zmn.pn �
nw�ao� nzw I'll .uspT.o� Msm-T*-swvzmC) Iv, --1.`--oo-----
Q
�����
oil
52
j y j Y) c 1 :: : I : z I :-. I ::- p, I... I :--
,;:.:: }f:3 9 02/06/96 7,5 0 5 5 0
303.46
72
1 :: : c .... 1 :: : ( - 1 t.) I ::. j y j 1 :: 1%1 73
242. 82 'ti 4 6 2 C
74
7S
_
. I
fvjl� , - I
0 2 96
11::44
.1111 1 ... E W(*)(*'I'.(**,
CJTY OF l y n::. .: . .� e
1. -'1::' 4
401 2 E). 9 4
02/06/96
662:1. 00
1-11ORTHWE(S)T C14APTER
:1. '-`96
20.00
F.E. C.) : 1: 11 T F7 1:
41
1`7`96 DUE::113
VC)UC4'*IAI:::I: %
40.00
42
2
.13 2 3 S 9, `5
441
CAAE C**
. K.
1) T 1:7
1.4yrSTROVI, % %
:1*11(
VI:JI1*QR,_
- *I:
-1:1. 36
4.51 2 C 9 6
02/06/96
720600
A
% I L I 11 E4 E.: 1:
NAME
1 -1 1 :: ( 1*9%1 .*1* 1 T I"I
AIVICAM"IT
5
It.. I.N
1 A 0. E 1. E. 11
y I I I I I I I A :
9 1
I ::. ( - FZ I - r .,. V - I. .: :
45., 00
7
3 81
02/06/96
ti 4 2 1. 3) 0
S
111 IFIE"UTTA IELAEVATOR., INCIO
.7 Maintenance
80.. 00
CY). 00
10
rr
(.3.
02/06/96
',542400
TR!AVE'l & A1 WE FIG)
, . 0
C)
VIDE 1: .1 F RI._ ... E.
12
13
.......
& Parks Association
%
1?6 DUE."O FTAR I' 1:Z C011111 '%:)'%: * }: N
3 B 1%5 00
14
% -f: STAF-I ... 1::-(
7 8, 00
17
E , OA
TAUBVIAN
78 00
6 (S (1)
22
EASTMAIA
7f!3 00
896 00
2 3811:5.4
0 0 e) 9 16
Y 50200
IYIN C HI "TS ..} 0 F .1 L.1 F cC %
% A C) C
:L 996 DOE.0
Zn
14 i...00
5
:1. 4,p .00
261
21
5E
2%) %*
. 15_._.
_0 2 4�
-
5 502.6Q_
L : { . t �.t
NT,
TLYTT 1 OR,
... r .
T L11 IJ C.) I'll
60. 00
1.996 X)Ul::*.%(:'%
30.00
16 15 00
y '!
311
`3 6
02/06/96:
c,
F 0
F A
DUEIS FX R FK C .% IA I E* F
13
40.00
0, 0 1
X"
271
2 3 8 8 *7 Q;'2 0 6 9 6
',57 0 0 '5 0 lyl 0 FIT Lft:, 1 " : 11 Ei"R G% r.:. 1-4 C y I(: 1 ce
F ,
F q i Fz & ivi ij� :C i%t 'r v I I - I i: I.-
0 0
... ...
1.62.00
120
3 E '( 3 8
02/06/96
6300'2f:1
11 F: IS o
RI : :* : I F* 0 R (S )* 0 C C I-H IR R 1: F*
e
1.14.00
1:1.4. 00
4f)
311
41
K.45-
021f. )6/176
6,`)08'%50
IIIAT:ruiHAI, Wn.
Wvli.4: S)
RC 1
'2 00
22.00
�:� �
34
e
8 9 0
02/06/96
640805
% - - - - - -
1 ... 1:0NIS) AUTO %S%I::.RV]:C%I::'
11 1 T vl . :: I
& --13: CA ... E*
2 • 1. 2 15
2:1. 2 1,5
44
45
35
4
23(39:1.
02/06/96
64O F-330
1111 :'X l* CEN Tel 'TE:*.(:%F-11*%I()l ... C) -' . E "%:, %) -,IC
1-41H.XT :1 : :.! 1 T't.. ,Y 'T'l�:l ":{"
--m
rS .. %* ,674..60
:1.3 9 674 .60
48
i�
I
f
,
22389,.%;
02/06/96:
661 1 E-1 I
!I%I. Al IW IA(Q
1%.1 T T 1.4 rl I 1{.`
".It -1 1 P.� q
0 A
52
j y j Y) c 1 :: : I : z I :-. I ::- p, I... I :--
,;:.:: }f:3 9 02/06/96 7,5 0 5 5 0
303.46
72
1 :: : c .... 1 :: : ( - 1 t.) I ::. j y j 1 :: 1%1 73
242. 82 'ti 4 6 2 C
74
7S
_
. I
401 2 E). 9 4
02/06/96
662:1. 00
1-11ORTHWE(S)T C14APTER
:1. '-`96
20.00
41
1`7`96 DUE::113
20.00
40.00
42
.13 2 3 S 9, `5
441
02/06/96-
6 7 0 9%5 0
1.4yrSTROVI, % %
:1*11(
FEUX-l...:!. NC*
-1:1. 36
4.51 2 C 9 6
02/06/96
720600
1:1) 12 0 0
1 * 00
5 2
46
4 7 2
_ 3897
02/06/96
7 2 0 7 6 E,'
F R I::** IYU F:* F% El A 1't K
I ::. ( - FZ I - r .,. V - I. .: :
45., 00
481
C
S 13OX REENT
60.00
:L 0
49
50 225 -19 G
02/06/96
74 J.',cWO
C)
VIDE 1: .1 F RI._ ... E.
.1 6., 9 0
.......
Fl -.(:) C-31 F" i') V I %c*)'(.J F* PL .1 E%(3
:1. 2 .. 5 4
52
j y j Y) c 1 :: : I : z I :-. I ::- p, I... I :--
,;:.:: }f:3 9 02/06/96 7,5 0 5 5 0
303.46
72
1 :: : c .... 1 :: : ( - 1 t.) I ::. j y j 1 :: 1%1 73
242. 82 'ti 4 6 2 C
74
7S
_
. I
�1
V1.lLlt.rl•'
C r 1 Ty C) F*, IYI>r1F
�::
FACIE I' :••�i:IE t ,
{� "E /0219
:1• :1• u ri d
. ., ,
I•'• R. ••' 1... I J. 0 X) 1
3
C*`'I-•IEKC,* K
(:`. 1 E:C , * K
VE I•••11)OI:
R
,3
} _
t •a' F •l F 4
4
lei t.l l� l A { 1 : :. !•�
•
X�
DA TEE
•, j�
1�1UIl . ,.E::4
t f
I !1 . 1lYll : :.
X)E: iC 3:l: T 1 !- 1
i•�lYlC)t.1I - -I'r
— - -- --- __
r�lYli.11.lr�( 5
5
6
6
�__ �:�3 00
02 / 06/96
?c� 2:1.
F C.)l% :yi: :. x :I' I...I...E AREA �ii'::I'•li:1t:)I...; :'s
_ . T_, .. __.__.
�:i4.1:1:1...I }:C I�li:a ' I °' ��'' : ' tir
_._ _ ._ ._._ ... _ - _ _ .I. ' t I ,l:)tiJk l Yl1 : 1 I t' :: `ifs ;, i j { {� .. �: ,)
r:; �• 8
..��, C����� r 0
y
e
;�:'., "• c� 0 3 .
02 /06/ c � 6
7�3� ». �:" 0
I:ZYAI i.ri:)1...1...f:::1: :1�1
.
IYI�� :i:1�1 ':
r1 ::1�1�11 ;1i::f:" lYl(1�rf: ::t��::l: t�1...
� ,�`:�
1 s' N
.. s .. ,. 1 .
.. ,.
I �' �
9
10
•
cy.:) 02
02/06
i BO Y� O
�
•. • . ..... •... : :: Fri. .r ,. ." N
�:3 �`Y r i.11..1.• .l: i:; l :: 1 ') I� !.l t ... f' {:y :1: Itii i"
f : 1.1 l::' I•:' L........ ...r_... - -- - -- _ - ---- -- --
� o ....
— - __..___ . _- --_ - -- -
1 9.014
--- -
1
"
:rt.11:.I: :'I...-- 1 : ::C, .... t:)I:: - 1° :I:i: %I : :.
- �r
.. ,c.. ,
12
....
d. d• �t,�, -
f;
13
t,ll::.I:: ! •I
jj :a _
-
la
i >t.11'•'I••'l.. 1::.::3.
J. ell N 6 1
}t:
2 1,
17
; 1.11::1::'L.. a:1 : ::c .TM. i:)i: °!:: :r
5 201 .. 90
18
..
2
02/06/9
7
,•iAlyl ,:i CO'L.UX D -I! a1: CF r
11X),;! .. .. -t.Y! i ...
20
F='Rt:)i';'FtiAIYI %St.Jl::'PL. 1 ES)'
: 9..
11
lyl rl 'I '
•
-- -� -
22
iY 1Jf�: :i : ::.. i��c:�r� yr�I N ::
!.� 7 :
� .. 0 .. .
23
IYIX�fal :: N F C)R I:zl : : : %,.%)AI ... I : :.
7 ) ., (:Y4
24
t t
Y . .. 1:: t 11'
..Y 5
y
•�. ;, 491 .. 60 33
26
3.1
27
-'-
S
2,.3 904 � ' /�)!t�.l /c�'�
LS'TM -
...
�� } .} � ::•
— -- _ __ ••'
_z ±f� 4 : I,.. I�i.r .1. 1 «• � � 1 r -I. I4li ,-- � _.._._!.rC
l l :l' ca ; � !:� is � ° t•; Y "'t:`
L2'.....�._.__...._Y • a +� 1 i _ A! _ .r__0� 3 _ _.�.�. !! L�_. _ ! + , ..
�3L •• L. i l� ._ • r max
•;, r,,` • :� ,::
8..1+G.. u ,.} , _
_ - -- — -- - --- +� - -'� —
� ii
29
VI.i• 3i,EI ... L-•Ahll::•t•il•1 {: i. J.'i••LEIS
191 .7
—_..._ _ .,..
,.394.. or.5 3/
2g
:tH
3U
...... ..
�'..:�` Oti
. .
02/ 06/ 96
E 4 ;,
.. ..
IS C `c. •�C °'i ''!
!
"' _ 0I f • t 'I_ I�Ii•' -
y t,�l,..t.�
�• �
31
l.l!`�.I. I•• i.)l•+,IYi:al - • •�I.L!`�i.,
'.I. .25
.( ��r++;� r; ,�.� _ j;
3 `
33
2% ` 590 7
02
(:1 { x' Q 4 , _. , _.N)()
U E3 W 1 : :.{.i*T* C" 'E.l. »L1.11...r R 1 111
280-557
.,�r
36
37
.m....,_. _ ._.
_. ....._. �� «..
T
.,
..,. .
38
39
ff yy
rC:�,'.i'7}08
02/06/96
qq
S' 0.1. 1,30
'
i 1l,'!•.I .'' • •S:`' {:•{:+ r •`
I. ::! �, !' �' X W1: :.,.3 r' ,C C N
{:' ::� ;� •S:` ..» . .., .
,•)U F I_, :i: f E �, 1� N I �'�. R .I: A!.•
49 r
:I. �..
{ t» r'y
F) � 1 :l:
w N 2
, 1U
2, 0 9
{2ft06t' 96
9 0 1 720
V... J1: :.I...1
-- -., ._._;._.` ... - ---- -- -- --__
,. .. F• t•11•', F E'SiAl...L:•
- -- — - — 1. �, - --
1 ' 0
— - -�
: L 3 6 0
fe
41
..
239: .. ....,., --,,,
0
ti l d :. 0
Iti! i.) I ..l. •) • I:.. .I• '♦
_..._.k -..,�/ f �. _.,...... -. - - .. _ ..- . -- ......._,..- ..
-} ! f •' f : :� {....l. 1 ::. l V l :: I • l .� r l.» I : :
�- r . _� _ �r« .. _ . _ _ F. _ m
r Y �G � .. . * %
T L 4 2 .. J. 3 J V
4}
2" % r' . L
0 `. / {)t� }r'96
91��;t����
' A(S)Iii.! {=�;t•1DI .1•Eil••I F�1::.1Y1OVAL.•
!•• F:.I::.E% FOR ::31::F�;'�.I.t.rl: :.
,. 2 ..
"y`:'''ti �:(.
;I
46
1 .'F:.l::. 3 1••'t.)i }I::,f !. i .,iTM'
r _ .� .1.
1 y0 1. 42_
47
2, ;9 .1. 2
0 2 /06 /96 l
`� •1.
V I R'r'1.11::• 1TM'IR 1N•r' •I.1
;:lt.11 °'I• °�I....i. l::.c.; .... t.)!'••I" .f. t'` �
r r.;
i
i
48
1. C
30P 69
., 1 5 0
...
c %_3A :_ �'E:`r'' VI "El'r ,:3
r:r;
:I. 7 �:, t)+�)
,, ..
52
.c:...}91
0� - /06 /Y6
92:1. , :
W .Fl. w...1.111. lT lAC3)il z I -il : ::
.
it.1� iC:l+::l:l��'•(':I: C)l�l i +�f - iYIF::lYf1C�F::I ;wiF•111:: S
•:
,. (0 % .
39.00 �-
y:3{
54
f,I
t.
57
�1
CHECK NUMBER
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DUCT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
CITY OF MA.PLEWOOD
1
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
01/26/96
ALLEN S PACH , SHERRY
3 0 9.7 7
01/26/96
CARLSON,THERESE
1,372982
01/26/96
BODINE, RENEE
1,12 0.31
01/26/96
FAUST, DANIEL F
2 , 731.93
01/26/96
ANDERSON,CAROLE J
1
01/26/96
DEHN, DEBORAH
706.03
01/26/96
HANGSLEBEN,RICHARD
1 1 755.51
01/26/96
KLAGER, WENDY
1,463o83
01/26/96
VIGNALO,DELORES A
1
01/26/96
BEHM,LOIS
1
01/26/96
CARLE,JEANETTE E.
1
01/26/96
JAGOE,CAROL
1
01/26/96
OLSON,SANDRA
707.00
01/26/96
FULLER,ELAINE
591.35
01/26/96
POWELL, PHILIP
1
01/26/96
ALDRIDGE,MARK
1
01/26/96
BECKER,RONALD D
2
01/26/96
BOHL,JOHN C
2,021.37
01/26/96
FLOR,TIMOTHY
1,499955
01/26/96
KVAM,DAVID
1
01/26/96
STEFFEN, SCOTT L
2 ,14 4.79
01/26/96
Y OUNGREN ,JAMES
2 0 6 7.3 7
01/26/96
EVERSON, PAUL
1, 460.31
01/26/96
FRASER, JOHN
1, 800.31
CHECK NUMBER
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
01/26/96
SAUNDERS,SARAH
1
01/26/96
ADELSON,LINDA
668095
01/26/96
STAHNKE,JULIE A
.1
01/26/96
HAIDER I KENNETH G
2,591.48
01/26/96
PRIEFER,WILLIAM
1
01/26/96
LUNDSTEN,LANCE
1
01/26/96
OSWALD, ERICK D
1, 431.39
01/26/96
DUCHARME,JOHN
1
01/26/96
MATTHYS, RUSS
1, 994.71
01/26/96
PECK,DENNIS L
1,621.91
01/26/96
ANDERSON, BRUCE
2
01/26/96
BURKE,MYLES R
1
01/26/96
MARUSKA,MARK A
1
01/26/96
GREW- HAYMAN , JANET M
7 3 0.9 5
01/26/96
BARTA,MARIE
1,205.11
01/26/96
COLEMAN,MELINDA
2
01/26/96
EKSTRAND,THOMAS G
1
01/26/96
ROBERTS,KENNETH
1
01/26/96
STAPLES,PAULINE
2
01/26/96
ANDERSON,MICHAEL
56.0.00
01/26/96
EASTMAN , THOMAS E
1 ,8 0 2.91
01/26/96
OLSON,RONALD J
1
01/26/96
RYMER,STEPHEN
1
01/26/96
RATHBURN,RODNEY
475.77
2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
3
CHECK
CHECKNUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
HURLEY , STEPHEN
1 6 8 3.4 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
PRIEFER, LORI
104.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J
1 6 7 5.51
DIRECT IDEPOSIT
01/26/96
COLEMAN, PHILIP
784019
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
EDGE, DOUGLAS
1 2 5 9.4 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
BROTTEM, TRACY
9 3.7 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
CROS SON , LINDA
98.9.91
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
HOSCH, JESSICA
42.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
SCHONES , DUSTIN
5 7.0 0
DIRECT I3EPOSIT
01/26/96
LIVINGSTON , JOYCE L
796936
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN
1 0 4 3.51
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/9-6
KNAUS S , PETER
721950
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
SALITROS , DARLENE
580.89
DIRECTDEPOSIT
01/26/96
CURTIS, CARL D.
987.51
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
PALMA, STEVEN
2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
JOHNSON , KEVIN
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
BARTEL ,DENISE
1 2 9 6.31
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
WARMAN , ROBIN
718o26
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/26/96
BEHAN , JAMES
9 8 7.51
50060
01/26/96
BASTIAN,GARY W
352.04
50061
01/26/96
CARLSON, DALE
309.77
50062
01/26/96
KOPPEN,MARVIN
309.77
5.0063
01/26/96
ROSSBACH,GEORGE
309.77
50064
01/26/96
CASAREZ,GINA
1
3
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
nd
WEA
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
50065
01/26/96
DAWSON, CRAIG Tip
2, 060.00
50066
01/26/96
HENSLEY,PATRICIA
79.68
50067
01/26/96
LE,SHERYL
2
50068
01/26/96
MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A
3
50069
01/26/96
ZICK,LINDA
293.25
50070
01/26/96
ENGSTROM,MICHAEL
23975
50071
01/26/96
PIEKARSKI,GREGORY J.
36.75
50072
01/26/96
CUDE,LARRY J
337.60
50073
01/26/96
MIKISKA,WILLIAM
210.40
50074
01/26/96
OSTER,ANDREA J
1
50075
01/26/96
DeBILZAN,JUDY
473.49
50076
01/26/96
MATHEYS,ALANA K
2
50077
01/26/96
AURELIUS,LUCILLE E
2
50078
01/26/96
FRY,PATRICIA
885940
50079
01/26/96
JOHNSON,BONNIE
838.92
50080
01/26/96
KELSEY,CONNIE L
696942
50081
01/26/96
VIETOR,LORRAINE S
1
50082
01/26/96
COLLINS,KENNETH V
2
50083
01/26/96
MARTINSON,CAROL F
1,589.94
50084
01/26/96
PALANK,MARY KAY
1
50085
01/26/96
RICHIE,CAROLE L
1
50086
01/26/96
RYAN,MICHAEL
2
50087
01/26/96
SVENDSEN,JOANNE M
1
50088
01/26/96
ARNOLD,DAVID L
2
nd
WEA
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
5
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
50089
01/26/96
BANICK,JOHN J
2
50090
01/26/96
BELDE,STANLEY
1
50091
01/26/96
BOWMAN,RICK A
1
50092
01/26/96
DREGER,RICHARD C
2
50093
01/26/96
DUNN,ALICE
1
50094
01/26/96
HERBERT,MICHAEL!J
2 1 058.15
50095
01/26/96
HIEBERT,STEVEN
1
50096
01/26/96
LANG,RICHARD J
1
50097
01/26/96
NELSON,ROBERT D
2 1 233.86
50098
01/26/96
RAZSKAZOFF,DALE
1
50099
01/26/96
SKALMAN,DONALD W
2
50100
01/26/96
STAFNE,GREGORY L
1
r
50101
01/26/96
STILL,VERNON T
1
50102
01/26/96
STOCKTON,DERRELL T
1
50103
01/26/96
SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J
1
50104
01/26/96
THIENES,PAUL
1 1 185.91
50105
01/26/96
WATCZAK,LAURA
.1 1 564.79
50106
01/26/96
WELCHLIN,CABOT V
1
50107
01/26/96
ANDREWS,SCOTT A
1
50108
01/26/96
BERGERON,JOSEPH A
2,044.51
50109
01/26/96
DOWDLE,VIRGINIA
1
50110
01/26/96
HANSEN,LESLIE
967.20
50111
01/26/96
HEINZ,STEPHEN J
1 1 984.37
50112
01/26/96
KARIS,FLINT D
11850.71
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
C'
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
50113
01/26/96
MEEHAN,JAMES
2
50114
01/26/96
MELANDER,JON A
1
50115
01/26/96
RABBETT,KEVIN
2,02 1.09
50116
01/26/96
THOMALLA,DAVID J
1
50117
01/26/96
VORWERK,ROBERT E
1
50118
01/26/96
HEWITT,JOEL A
2
50119
01/26/96
EMBERTSON,JAMES M
1
50120
01/26/96
BOYER,SCOTT K
1
50121
01/26/96
FEHR, JOSEPH
1, 401.59
50122
01/26/96
FLAUGHER,JAYME L
1
50123
01/26/96
HALWEG,KEVIN R
2
50124
01/26/96
LAFFERTY,WALTER
1
50125
01/26/96
PETERS,JILL
700979
50126
01/26/96
RABINE,JANET L
1
50127
01/26/96
CHLEBECK,JUDY M
1
50128
01/26/96
KIRWIN,HELENE
609.56
50129
01/26/96
DARST,JAMES
1
50130
01/26/96
FREBERG,RONALD L
1
50131
01/26/96
HELEY,RONALD J
1
50132
01/26/96
KANE, MICHAEL R
1
50133
01/26/96
LUTZ,DAVID P
1
50134
01/26/96
MEYER,GERALD W
1 1 518.81
50135
01/26/96
NAGEL, BRYAN
1 1 471o58
50136
01/26/96
RUNNING,ROBERT
927.05
C'
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
6
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
DATE
-- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------ - -
AMOUNT
50137
01/26/96
- - --
ELIAS,JAMES G
------------ - - - - --
1
50138
01/26/96
LINDBLOM,RANDAL
1 1 378.71
50139
01/26/96
PRIEBE,WILLIAM
1 1 563.51
50140
01/26/96
BRENNER,LOIS J
1 1 325.91
50141
01/26/96
KRUMMEL,BARBARA A
624.95
50142
01/26/96
ANDERSON,ROBERT S
1 1 390.94
50143
01/26/96
HELEY,ROLAND B
1
50144
01/26/96
HINNENKAMP,GARY
1 1 322.96
50145
01/26/96
LAVAQUE,MICHAEL
1 1 322.96
50146
01/26/96
LINDORFF,DENNIS P
1 1 338.71
50147
01/26/96
SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES
1 1 361.97
50148
01/26/96
HORSNELL,JUDITH A
802.43
50149
01/26/96
HUTCHINSON,ANN E
1
50150
01/26/96
KUNDE,MARGARET
170.31
50151
01/26/96
NELSON,JEAN
854.39
50152
01/26/96
SOUTTER,CHRISTINE
17.44
50153
01/26/96
MISKELL,NANCY
650.63
50154
01/26/96
WEGWERTH,JUDITH A
1
50155
01/26/96
ERICSON,JAMES
170.00
50156
01/26/96
CARVER,NICHOLAS N
1
50157
01/26/96
OSTROM,MARJORIE
1
50158
01/26/96
WENGER,ROBERT J
1
50159
01/26/96
ANDERSON,BERNARD
185.60
50160
01/26/96
APSE,LESLIE A
30.00
6
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
8
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
50161
01/26/96
APSE,SHELLY L
30.00
50162
01/26/96
AYERS,RYAN
110000
50163
01/26/96
BLOOMER,JUSTIN
60.00
50164
01/26/96
BROWN,TIM
140.00
50165
01/26/96
BUCKINGHAM,PAUL
40.00
50166
01/26/96
BUCZKOWSKI,ALAN
6.0.00
50167
01/26/96
CHASE,TANIA
144.25
50168
01/26/96
DANIELSON,SCOTT
60.00
50169
01/26/96
FEUCHT,KENNETH
40.00
50170
01/26/96
FRANK,PETER J
258.75
50171
01/26/96
JANSEN,MICHAEL
60.00
50172
01/26/96
JOHNSON,DENIS
50.00
50173
01/26/96
LANDE,MICHAEL
126.00
50174
01/26/96
LINN,ERIC G
100000
50175
01/26/96
LINN,MATTHEW 0
60.00
50176
01/26/96
LUNA,BRIAN
90900
50177
01/26/96
LUND,ERIC
60.00
50178
01/26/96
LYSTIG,JOHN
110.50
50179
01/26/96
MACK,DAN
30.00
50180
01/26/96
METCALF,BRENT A
60900
50181
01/26/96
MCPARTLIN,TERRENCE
60.00
50182
01/26/96
NEWMANN,JENNIFER L
60.00
50183
01/26/96
NGUYEN,THINH
30.00
50184
01/26/96
RHEIN,MICHELLE L
84.50
8
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
0
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
---- .-- - - - - --
DATE
-- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------ - -
AMOUNT
50185
01/26/96
- - --
RYMER,MARC
-------------------
40.00
50186
01/26/96
SCHULTZ- III,HAROLD W
32.50
50187
01/26/96
SUMMER,CHRISTY
45900
50188
01/26/96
SVENDSEN,BRIAN
84.75
50189
01/26/96
SZYBATKA,CARRIE
31.50
50190
01/26/96
WARD,ROY G
476.00
50191
01/26/96
WATSON,JOANNA L
316.25
50192
01/26/96
ZABEL,JAMIE
45.50
50.193
01/26/96
ZABEL,LAURIE
52.00
50194
01/26/96
BREHEIM,ROGER W
1
50195
01/26/96
EDSON,DAVID B
1
50196
01/26/96
'GERMAIN,DAVID
1
50197
01/26/96
NADEAU,EDWARD A
1 1 783.61
50198
01/26/96
NORDQUIST,RICHARD
1
50199
01/26/96
THOMAS- JR,STEVEN
1
50200
01/26/96
ATKINS,KATHERINE
428.82
50201
01/26/96
COONS,MELISSA
661.72
50202
01/26/96
DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M
1
50203
01/26/96
ESTEVEZ,DIANE
137.70
50204
01/26/96
GLASS,JEAN
649.95
50205
01/26/96
GRAF,MICHAEL
732.33
50206
01/26/96
HOIUM,SHEILA
422.63
50207
01/26/96
HUGHES,JILL
102.00
50208
01/26/96
KELLY,LISA
5 67.08
0
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
10
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
50209
01/26/96
LARSON,TESSA
26.00
50210
01/26/96
MEINKE,JENNY
276.75
50211
01/26/96
PETERSON,KAYLENE
583923
50212
01/26/96
PETERSON,RICHARD
460.90
50213
01/26/96
SCHMIDT,RUSSELL
278.80
50214
01/26/96
SOLUM,PETER B
55.25
50215
01/26/96
VERNER,JEAN
101.50
50216
01/26/96
ARCAND,CHRIS A
86.13
50217
01/26/96
BADEN,MATHIAS
76.50
50218
01/26/96
BASTIAN,ALEX
130.00
50219
01/26/96
BERGEN,SUSAN M
54.00
50220
01/26/96
CHAPMAN,JENNY A
144.00
50221
01/26/96
DAMIANI,ROBERT
63.00
50222
01/26/96
DAVIS,WENDY
26.43
50223
01/26/96
DELANEY,JAMES
18.00
50224
01/26/96
DOTSON,ALISHA
318955
50225
01/26/96
EGGEN,ERIC J
98000
50226
01/26/96
FLANAGAN,MICHAEL D
87.00
50227
01/26/96
GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C
72.00
50228
01/26/96
HJELM,ERIC
33.00
50229
01/26/96
IKHAML,JOHN
267.36
50230
01/26/96
ILLI,SARAH
96900
50231
01/26/96
ISERMAN,MICHAEL L
256.88
50232
01/26/96
JENSEN,MATTHEW
719.29
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
50233
50234
50235
50236
50237
50238
50239
50240
50241
50242
50243
50244
50245
50246
50247
50248
50249
50250
50251
50252
50253
50254
50255
50256
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
11
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
01/26/96
JOHNSON,JESSICA
425.35
01/26/96
JOHNSON,ROBERT P
66.00
01/26/96
KASMARIK,DANIELLE M
162.00
01/26/96
KAUFMAN,GINA
374.85
01/26/96
KLETT,ANNA
242.16
01/26/96
KOEHNEN,MARY B
126.00
01/26/96
KRAEMER,JILL
465.40
01/26/96
KULLANDER,CHRISTINE
60.00
01/26/96
LEVITAN,JULIE D
132.00
01/26/96
LIVINGSTON,KELLY
319.05
01/26/96
LUI3RS , BETHANY L
153,00
01/26/96
MAJKOZAK,MICHELLE
90.00
01/26/96
MARUSKA,ERICA
162.00
01/26/96
MEISEL,TAMBREY
21.00
01/26/96
MICHEL,MOLLY
132.00
01/26/96
MILLER,CANDI
217.50
01/26/96
MCGRUDER,DONALD E
461.25
01/26/96
MCQUILLAN,ANNE S
260.00
01/26/96
NORTHQUEST,JONEEN L
75000
01/26/96
PEGO,JOHN M
169.00
01/26/96
PLACHECKI,MELISSA J
60.00
01/26/96
POWERS,JESSICA
312.81
01/26/96
SIVERSON,OLAF L
174.00
01/26/96
SMITLEY,SHARON L
36900
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
12
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
50257
01/26/96
SURFACE,SAMUEL
57.00
50258
01/26/96
SWANER,JESSICA
81.00
50259
01/26/96
THIBODEAU,KELLY M
600.00
50.260
01/26/96
WEDES,CARYL H
72.00
50261
01/26/96
WESTBERG,JENNIFER
42.00
50262
01/26/96
WESTBERG,MELINDA
174.50
50263
01/26/96
BOSLEY, CAROL
183.63
50264
01/26/96
CHRISTENSEN,JODIE
222.75
50265
01/26/96
DULL,KELLIE
86.06
50.266
01/26/96
FERRIERE,SONYA L
81.25
50267
01/26/96
FLEMING,KATHY A
30.00
50268
01/26/96
FRANK,LAURA
123.00
50269
01/26/96
GOSSMAN,SAUNDRA
40950
50270
01/26/96
JOHNSON,ARIEL
59.06
50271
01/26/96
LEHNEN,LORI
48.94
50272
01/26/96
MCDILL,LAYL M
326.25
50273
01/26/96
OLEARY,VIRGINIA
63.44
50274
01/26/96
RENSLOW,RITA
148.50
50275
01/26/96
SAGER,TENA
16.88
50276
01/26/96
SANCHEZ,HELEN
13.40
50277
01/26/96
SATTLER,KRISTIN
66.50
50278
01/26/96
SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN
185.50
50279
01/26/96
STOFER,DALE
40.00
50280
01/26/96
SWANSON,KARI
137.50
TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS 267,929.94
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
13
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
50281
01/26/96
ANDERSON,MICHELE
168.75
50282
01/26/96
AUER,DANIEL
343.32
50283
01/26/96
BAILEY,DEANNA L
110000
50284
01/26/96
CHRISTENSEN,JANET
306.51
5028.5
01/26/96
ERSFELD,ALICE L
77.00
50286
01/26/96
HURT,CAROL J
147.00
50287
01/26/96
JAHN,DAVID J
1
50288
01/26/96
JAQUES,THOMAS
156.25
50289
01/26/96
KELLY,CASEY
168.00
50290
01/26/96
LATHAM,BETTY
507.40
50291
01/26/96
MILLS,DEREK
132.00
50292
01/26/96
MOSS,STEPHANIE E
168.00
50293
01/26/96
SCHLINGMAN,PAUL
1
50294
01/26/96
SWANSON,LYLE
1
50295
01/26/96
SWANSON,VERONICA
690.94
50296
01/26/96
MULVANEY,DENNIS M
1
50297
01/26/96
SPREIGL,GEORGE C
1
TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS 267,929.94
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: James Ericson -- Planning Intern
SUBJECT Conditional Use Pe rmit Review -- Co untryside VW
LOCATION: 1180 Highway 36 East
DATE: Ja nuary 22, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Act I Can . by Co unc.a. ,
Endors ed.�....
Mod.ifi ed,�
Rej ecte
Date
The conditional use permit, (CUP) at 1180 Highway 36 East is due for review. The CUP allows
the expanded operation of the motor vehicle maintenance and repair garages. This site is
occupied by Countryside Volkswagen. Refer to the map on page 2 and site plan on page 3.
BACKGROUND
January 9,1995: The city council granted the CUP and approved the expansion of Countryside
VWs maintenance, service, sales and showroom space. Refer to the council minutes on page
.4 for conditions of the CUP. The council also approved a right -of -way vacation resolution
assigning an 84- by 17.5 -foot section of frontage along Highway 36 to Countryside VW.
DISCUSSION
The construction work at Countryside Volkswagen is progressing and will not be completed until
summer of 1996 at the earliest.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit at 11.80 Highway 36 East again in one year.
p:1 ... 1sec91c'sidevw. rev
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. 1/9/95 City Council Minutes
Attachment 1
KOHI�V+N AVE. ROAD
J cou
si
,r PALM � �
PAO CT.
CONNOR �� : ��/E, � A �
OEI.Aqg ..BROOKS
AV,
�'
�., O � 1.v6• o
W
� 0 G
� � SO( T/Wi
,�. CERYAtS AVE, y GERVMS
R � GRA►aOVtEw AVE.
Pl(lyt• � VIKING OR.
poo
•� � SHERREN AVE.
. .... •..� � ^�.:.: cif: C' COPE �G� Z2
Ot
% of*
�j lC�MK�� -� , LARK AVE. .,
� VIKING OR. O � � � o
W F LAURIE RD.
SAND, URST
39 U ♦,
� LAURIE Cf. � IEUWD RD. v Q �
JUNCTION AVE
Bi1RKE C7. � p� Cs
BURKE AV ��� 6 d AyE BURKE AVE. o
(1) C WW BERS ST t
ELDRtDCE � AV ° � � ELDR IOCE AVE.
SKILLMAN A1/. SKILL � � AV E' SKILL MM.. AvE.
KENW 000
W u
AN AV.
CD %moor
wry,...
nrosr �
:LLw00D AVE. FE WON AvE.
o. C)
W � X MIS
6tE AVE I �j I
RIP LEY Z
A1�
a� w.i.n.+ PH IA 0 0 � �o loko
SO a _t; � � so inn AVE � �" � v
LOCATION MAP
2
Attachment 2
J g
ki
?� �.�.......... + .... . /..
•� i
.. • � a,ir�orr p+ct� � 0 v . •s •
� � .........�. *. ........... .
l
It s
lie
a I • `
' ' 1 l • �Q � w� �y
• •� �� � ' X1 1
• 1 1' �! 1 I 1 1 1 t 1
w. � 1 j • 1 11 �,jj
� • � � � � _,,,,r � ..._— � r ._._ �''r--- � �t � � ' '
�3 w�
�r� s
•
ate_ ---- -�—r -- + dr
.;.:H.
1
1
gs 4�
1
-.A
SITE PLAN
3
4
N
- -- -- - Attachment 3
• Approva1 is subject
to the f of 1 ow i ng cond
a pproved by the Ci The
•
All construction shall follow ow the si plan app
1• A rove minor change
Director of Community Development may a PP
hi n one year of Council
pro osed construction must be started w t y .
2. Thep The Council may extend the s deadline
a .nova or the perrnit st }ai 1 end . .
PP
for one year.
• provided that all
City waives the requi number of parking spaces, p
3. The C y
vehicles shall be parked on a paved p rki n lot. . CTt�� s is a Code
9 .
• � rove an plans for expanding the paved
requirement.) The Ci must app y p. ed on
• limit the vehicles stored or display
park areas . The c, ty, may
• it decides that there is insufficient on site parking.
the site �f the City
maintain screening along all south
The property owner shall install and ma�nt 9 •
4' ro P p y munit Des n Review Board must
lot 1 nes� to meet the City Code . The Com y g
approve the screening plan.
• excep emergency n
5 . There shall be no vehicle access. envy vehicles, to or fro�
e p 9
Duluth Street.
6. All dumps hers on the s i t e sha
l l be enclosed as required by City Code.
7. The
City Council shall review this permit in one year.
• imi tat i on on ingress /egr on Duluth Street is
8. contin of the 1
only for public safety
vehi and i s not for trucks and comme rcial
traffic.
ncilmember Ko
Seconded by Cou PP en Ayes all
I? IS
f ..
42
. F.-3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Jim Ericson -- Planning Intern
SUBJECT:
Preliminary Plat Time Extension
PROJECT:
Knollwood Circle Addition
LOCATION:
west of Cyprus Street and South of County Road C
DATE:
January 19, 1996
INTRODUCTION
A ticn by Council,
En.dors e d. ,, ..
Modified. -.
R e j e c t e
Date
Pat Goff is requesting a one -year time extension. He is representing Goff Homes, Inc. (See his letter on
page 5.) The time extension is for a fourteen -lot preliminary plat called the Knollwood Circle Addition.
(See the maps on pages 2 -3 and the preliminary plat on page 4.)
BACKGROUND
On December 15, 1988, the city council approved the preliminary plat, subject to several conditions. The
council also rezoned the site from F (farm residential) to R -1 (single dwellings).
The council has approved six (6) time extensions for this plat, each lasting one year and subject to the
1988 conditions.
DISCUSSION
There have been no changes to the city code that would warrant changing or .ending the plat now.
However, more than eight years have passed since the city held a public hearing on this plat. There may
be new neighbors near the plat site and they should have a chance to comment on the plans to develop
this property. In addition, there has been no physical activity to develop this plat in the eight -year
period.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a final, one -year time extension for the Knollwood Circle Addition preliminary plat. This time
extension shall be subject to the December 15, 1988 preliminary plat conditions. If the developer takes
no action to develop this site by February, 1997, the city should end this preliminary plat.
p:sec9Vcnollw'd.mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line / Zoning Map
3. Preliminary Plat
4. Letter from Pat Goff dated January 16, 1996
Attachment 1
y, G 1. SUMMIT CT.
�
rot 2. COUNTRIMEW CIR.
G 3. DULUTH CT.
4. LYDIA ST. rn
BEAM AVE s� � ° 19 BEM4
60
Cj
W
�J Lake � KC>HL1�4W AVE,
�p�r RED �
Hu t
I PLAZA 23
Z k � DR PALM �i ':,.,.•��� �^ �� '� Cr v
.3 BELLECREST
4 Dfat/ViILE DR ►13� �+.�.+` N �
3 MERIDIAN OR CT. � �► 3 � CT,
CONN4 CO NOR
3 � �. f_ AVE.
@ N BROOKS
W
0 8R0OK5 `� W t' SEX '
GE7tvAJS AVE. > CERVAJS
GRANMIEw
po �� VIKING
Lo c�e '
� SHERREN AVE. �
COPE
-WWI t
�- Kener � r AVE.
r
VIKING DR. O
60 � to4e CO. < RD, y v � U►URIE R0.
a ¢
W v Ui1RIE CT. a� C ; lEl��'J RD. v o SW URST
%WNciwn, AVE
Y BURKF CT. �
BURKE AV / � a E AVE 6URKE AVE. o
Par* ( 1 ) CMA�WSERS ST ELDRIDGE � AV ��, p � � ELDR IDLE AVE. d
�,v
D; E rn E. BELt�10NT AVE. ^�
hrlir�e
ke BEIMONT tN,
p � SKUl � OL,Av E. SKI SKILL WW AVE.
LLMAN AV. KENW 000 s
a Ike
LOCATION MAP
4
N
anf-
per ^ - 4morm
(e 0 / 2 3.7 S 169.8 `� �...�� ' O O �•� r� ��� �.,� ;w
IN
It. 14
I %
r ��, .. :.: -.
i
N 4) 0
2
{• . ;
UN
CD
�:•.•..:ti ::::: ✓::::�:.:::...
N �''y;:;:• fL : ?r: ?r, {�Y.�t;. •���r , ?? r ✓:•.;::' %ti' %: %' %' %'v: %•% %f �;�;ff:•: %;: }...,..$f� .::
' , • •f•L • 1 }: •:LL %j•✓:''X•;• ?x.5;•;1 ?�,� L•. .' r • `:: • • ... lL• :''•:• :•''• • �•; ', ,
CIA
/� '• • Y • jr }ff• ✓L'• • r • r � P' Y :1 .•. } J• j•: ✓:: • ..:•.::•:::::::. � ::.
'"', . `u .L . :`1 }} ,r v. ;C ' r: % �:}'r: ?�' •'.• ;;�'r: M:';v' %;•1j'.:;� L.L,:..} Y, ✓., .•:.,1:. 51 1 j� •
• ••. � ,,,. ;,r'.vtiL r j • r rr;}}'L}',. %r}:'r }•� rvrr }•
r ••v }:v. j •'� ..:vv'' j• Lr }'•;,:.•. rr��{ •Lrr • L :. ✓ '�;. ' O l L
x: X
.. . .,..•.L rr; ;{ . }• . j,�,�, �.• •:+ rG''It O:LVAtivf: %' .;..•..v .,L..;ti.: •'L''• •••.'. ♦ •
( .` ti :•
•
;.L; ; ? : ; ?; •'.•.titi :'•:.•... r.; }1. %:�'r ✓:....
titi ., {}'�:� � :' • ����}� }:• ?L':• " �. • �
N
KNOLLWOOD : ,
Ci R ' C LE ` 4 r. r 1 :• •,.;.,:, + }r ,�'�': %: %;::• ;:•:• te r , '3 � � ' � � � h + C
• / 2 I
If C t a) % � f :�::. • ,vr ;•: • :•:; ;.•: ?:^x;�Ta.;t. .•:•::ti•:ti•: } 'ti • %:•: ✓� •1
•+ • • gy
}' '' •: �•; j. ✓ ; . • . •,' f �'%' • .. ✓ti ... L. ✓.. • . m.
t i`• 1 � I � � � ti;: fir{ ti, .. •' ;y �'%'?'� �:vr ;.• ?;:;.ff::??;}> tir ?j;.•r.•.
NU
.. �• r • y :.,.; . {'.;.•. :. %' :.titi•: ;••• ✓••; ;•••,? �
r ', ' • i"
•• %f :; %vr r:• r v 'r r v y ti•;,• • •$fir }•.j v •••'rf.� ... 1
3 _ ♦ j j �, f �•.�,'O''f YJ ••'• f 1 J'1 r ❖. � •1 � •' � •i ; ;;•;,;•• , j ,� • P• {Y:''��''�ti� •iLL;.; :;• - � 1
4Qv • Y�;�. V=.' , '�`�'�,� , � j . L ;.Yrj,.,• • 71
1l rrrr' ., } �•G„Yf •' "75•r L,✓ .•' • 1
L•%ti.Y•;•L ✓, ••} %}✓ ::':• 1' %'L� SS• .••'L • ., r r }• . ✓'•1 L;•
low
Irk
t . ;. :: }, ' ,�? jam• :;� ..
, } • ?1: r'N,r: y L'•:.,{�, ••r: {•L }'LL:•:L • } }WV' �.'.• •r . •'•::✓✓:. : : j;' ' •
�� . � { • ti;••:•::..:� � ✓✓ ,r::�,tiyJ. •�; };•�' } 1••i ::; :':f •'''}' : � L;:;O: ;:•j ��� ; �f� �i':ti :';,•;'4;• T / 1
.. y+ �•,::;.,r,:. 1 �?;;�� � {r'r{::; :. ?r:L;..v' r • r• };rte {Y •Lj j � iO / , : S �.
Tz
%4C AV
do
It 33
S A-
IF
_. Id t
ov in
*4 4r ,
^j LLJ
et
t\r. 0 �0
�3) fI
4�• 1 ,off $ _ 7�� * 3, _ �3 ! 0
,,,• �9 5•• ,�; x .15 :� 0
14 4SKAW AM 'm am 40 oppmem.
o ff, • 4 '" �,: `� l r.. 2 'fie i 1 E'
ADD, Ee
Ri
-- 0 85.58 l 5
Ic
EMrONT AV E 1-- L ei 1�
too
n
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
ON
Q
N
3
• •
M
Attachment 3
dor
•- ;
U l f • i
Ole
,� i rr►+�
/ ''� 3
lop
^:,.�
Or
ui
IL z
� .. • ',ter 1 � / -' r
•
W e m ,
i
r: 1
. • � g + W � � • • iii• •
OO D CIRCLE .
r W
Orly%^ w ♦ ♦ C
.` 4 00 W � LrJ
1
SITE PLAN
PRELIMINARY PLAT
' (APPROVED 12- 15-88)
61
4
N
GOFF HO% S, INC.
865 ASPEN CIRCLE
LITTLE CAS+ - AD.A, 1U.\7ESOTA 5_5109
612-492-0767
JA. ARY 16 1996
Attach 4
1 [9@ .. nwC� : I� l
IFlik 18'
Mr. Tom Ekstrand
City of Maplewood
1 830 East County Road 8
Maplewood, �4innesota 55 109
.Re: Knollwvood Circle - Prelim Plat Rene%;
Dear Honorable Nlayor and City Council:
We are requesting a renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for KnoliNvood Circle Addition.
n
Enclosed is a check for $1 40.00 to cower the renewal fee.
Sincerely,
Patrick W. Goff
5
� �•
i
� f� t 4 a w t'
F ah 1
AGENDA
Endo eda.�,....
Modifieti
lRe j e ct e , _
To: Ci Manager Michael McGuire Date
'c Safety Kenneth V. Collin
From. Director of Publ i a y
Subject: East Count Line. Fire Department /Oakdal a Ambulance Dispatching
County
Contract
Date: January 30, 1996
Introduction
Attached ease find two copies of the 1996 East County Line Fire
P P
Department /Oakdale Ambulance dispatching contract. They have been signed by
the app ro ri East County Line Fire Department representatives.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the contract be approved and both copies be signed by
the Mayor, the City Clerk, and you and then returned to me for distribution.
Action Required
Review and approval by you and the City Council.
KVC :js
Attachments
Ft.- S0000
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: City Clerk
RE: GAMBLING LICENSE - ST. JEROMES CHURCH
DATE: February 7, 1996
St. Jerome's Church needs to renew their Charitable Gambling License with the
State of Minnesota, which requires a resolution from Maplewood.
RESOLUTION
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood,
Minnesota, that the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved
for St. Jeromes Church to operate at St. Jerome's School, 376
Roselawn Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota and at Dean's Tavern, 1986
Rice Street, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any
objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as
governed by Minn. Stat. §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the
Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming
approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minn.
Stat. §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this resolution by
the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the
Gambling Control Division for their approval.
MEMORAND Aot i on by Counci
To: Michael A. Mc M e
From: Bruce K. Anderso Parks Endorse �....._..�..
o a s & Recreation
Modif i e r��..,______�e.
Subs Annual Report .
l,ejecte
.Date: February 1, 1996 �
Day t
Introduction
In compliance with Article II, Section 21 -20, of the Maplewood City Ordinance, the Park and
Recreation Commission is required to submit an Annual Report for City Council consideration.
Attached is a copy of the Annual Report, which highlights our department's accomplishments,
as well as shortcomings.
Backgr
1995 was an extremely busy year for the Parks and Recreation Department. A brief review of
major issues are as follows:
1. The Parks and Recreation Department managed and operated the Maplewood Communit
Center.
2. Western Hills and Timber Parks were re- designed and developed.
3. $609,000 was received in City P.A.C. monies.
4. The Community Center Trail was completed, including an outdoor gazebo.
5. We assumed supervision of the indoors of the City Campus, including City Hall, Maplewood
Community Center, Public Works Building, Park Maintenance Building and Nature Center
Building.
6. Recreation Program Fees - The City Council adopted the David M. Griffith Associate Study
which will result in an increase of recreation fees in 1996.
7. The City acquired three land parcels, including a Neighborhood Park to serve the Linwood
and Highwood Neighborhood, Open Space off of Highwood Avenue, and the School District
##622 property located north of Highwood Avenue.
8. Joint- Powers Agreements in cooperative ventures were forged with the Ramsey ount Fair
y y
Board, three Eagle Scout projects, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Commission and
3M.
9. Master Plans were developed for the Maplewood Community Center Park and the Maplewood
Nature Center.
Recommundation
It is my recommendation that the City Council accept the Annual Report for the Parks and Rec-
reation Department, as recommended by the Maplewood Park and Recreation Commission.
. , DEPARTMENT
612- ??0 -45 ?0
PARKS AND RECREATION
Januar
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:
In. compliance with Article .II, Section 21 -20, of the Maplewood City Ordinance, the Park and
Recreation Commission hereby submits its Annual Report and 1996 Activity Plan.
We reviewed the accomplishments of the past year and discussed the various programs and
activities we wish to pursue in the coming year. Our cont" goal is promoting our city parks,
open spaces, Community Cemer and maintaining a quality Park System geared to the continually
changing demographics of our community.
We appreciate your past support and anticipate continued interaction between the City Council
and Park and Recreation Commission during 1996.
We also appreciate the support and assistance provided by the Parks and Recreation Department
Director and his dedicated staff.
Respectfully submitted,
Peter Fischer, Chair
Jeanne Ewald, ice -Chair
Donald Christianson, Secretary
Bonnie Qualley
Carolyn Peterson
Marabeth Timmers
Rick Brandon
Craig Brannon
Cathy Tollefson
• t • • • s - 81 • • * w
AC i NITY PLAN OF THE PARK AND RECREATION FOR 1995
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
The mission of the Parks and Recreation Deparhment is "To provide a community environ-
znent for all citizens to participate in and enjoy cultural and recreational activities on an
equitable basis."
As we look forward to 1996, we reflect on some of the events of the past year to measure our
accomp �. The major park develo anent projects were western sand
P Timber Parks.
Both sites were completely renovated and completed on budget and on time with city P.A.C.
;ponies. The second, and probably or issue our department freed in 1995, was the manage
ment and operations of the Maplewood Community Center. Additional accomplishments
include:
commum Cen ter
* Completion of a Faster Plan for the Maplewood Co 'ty Center Park. The Master Plan
proposes a major Outdoor Amphitheater complex, trails, formal _gardens and play structure.
* Groundbreaking was conducted for the Carver and Edgerton Elementary School Community
Gymnasium facilities m mid -May.
* A Marketing Study has been initiated for the Parks and Recreation Department, and
specifically the Maplewood Community Center.
* A new Coriity Center sign was installed on white Bear Avenue.
* Numerous new staff hires were retained in 1995, inclung new Aquatics Program Director
Linda Crosson and Building VW"Menance Supervisor Paul ��.n.
The Maplewood Co `ty Center received the M.R.P.A. Award of Excellence, which is
the highest award given for outstanding facility design program development in October 1995.
* The Maplewood Comununity Center was recognized by Athletic Business, which is the
business magazine for athletic fitness and recreation professionals in October 1995, as an
outstanding public facility and received front page coverage.
Trails
* The Park and Recreation Commission recommended, and the City Council approved,
�g the trail along McKnight Road duriag the winter season.
The Maplewood CityHall /Community Center Trail was completed. 3he tray is .544 miles
in length. In addition, the Outdoor Gazebo was completed.
Harvest Park trail was realigned to tie into the Willard Munger Trail.
Park Policies! R reat ion Policies
The Park and Recreation Commission recommended, and the City Council adopted, a Fee
Study which will increase Recreation Program Fees by approximately 25 %.
* The Park and Recreation Commission developed and adopted an "Adopt A Park" Program.
* The Park and Recreation Commission forwarded boundary letters to abutting property owners
to city park land outlining the city policy regarding usage of public park property. The city -
has initiated a three year process to survey all park boundaries and install appropriate boundary
markers.
* The Park Commission developed an Athletic Facility Plan.
* The Park Commission reviewed and monitored Community Center policies.
The .Maplewood In Motion was restructured to focus around four major quarterly issues to
reflect the seasonal operations of the Parks and Recreation Department.
* A Park and Recreation Commission job description was prepared by the Park Commission
and adopted by the City Council.
* . A new Scholarship Program was put in place by the Maplewood Park and Recreation
Commission, as well as a Frequent User Punch Card. Numerous new recreation programs
were developed.
Land Transactions
Op en Sipace
* The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed all Open Space acquisition parcels
and provided a recommendation to the City Council.
* The city acquired the Custom Mllwork property located north of Iiighwood Avenue.
* The city acquired the School District #622 property located north of Highwood Ave.
park Land
* The city acquired a new Neighborhood Park east of Sterling and north of Schaller
Drive. The Neighborhood Park will service the Linwood and Iiighwood
neighborhood.
* The Park Commission recommended the sale of Lot 1, Block 1, in Beth Heights
Addition.
* The Park Commission reviewed numerous proposals regarding the acquisition of
land in the Kohiman Lake Overlook Neighborhood. The Park Commission hopes
to bring this issue to a close in 1996.
P.A.C.
* Cash park dedication amounts were negotiated and received for the new Maplewood Retail
Center and Dayton's.
* The Park Commission recommended, and the City Council approved, increasing the
Residential P.A.C. Fees to $575 per unit.
* The Mervyn's P.A.C. Fee was negotiated in the amount of $62.,955.
* Total P.A.C. monies received in 1995 xceeded $500,000.
Cooperative Ventures
* The Park and Recreation Commission became intimately involved wtih the Ramsey County
Fair, including coordination of a Rollerblade Race, Pog Tournament and Fireworks.
* The Parks and Recreation Department coordinated two major Eagle Scout projects; the
first being extensive flower planting along White Bear Avenue, and the second being
planting of 150 connifer trees at Vista Hills Park.
* The Wakefield parking lot was redeveloped by Ramsey County at the request of the
Park and Recreation Commission.
# The Fourth of July Celebration was basically rained out.
* Numerous Joint-Powers relationships were developed with local school districts, businesses,
and surrounding municipalities.
* Ramsey County Open Space was dealt with extensively. The City Council is currently work-
ing directly with the Ramsey County Board to determine the final disposition of Ramsey
County ]ands.
Nature. Center
* Anew concept plan was developed for the Maplewood Nature tenter for implementation
in 1996.
The. Park and Recreation Commission also toured all the Maplewood parks and conducted a
Spring -and Fall tour of our major park developments.
1996 Goals
* Implement plan for Maplewood Nature Center entrance.
Update P.A.C. Ordinance.
Finalize Land ement Plan for Open Space and Park Areas.
* Evaluate Athletic Facility Plan.
* Monitor and evaluate current recreational programs/fees and .Adopt -A -Park Partnerships.
* Review of recreational trail and park access needs in the city.
Review and monitor Maplewood Community Center policies.
* Acquire land for Kohhnan overlook area and Gateway/Willard Munger trail head.
* Develop Master Plan for outdoor facilities at Edgerton and Carver Schools in cooperation
with the school districts.
Standardization of park equipment and facilities.
* Continue a long -range plan development by asses s;.ng current and future funding of
Capital Improvement Projects.
Continue parklopen space boundary process.
Our, vision is to begin along -Range Planning Process to guide the city and Park and Recreation
Commission in fulfilling our Mission Statement. Following are some of the medium and long-
range goals we anticipate to be of importance:
Ieium- -Term Goals (1997 -1998)
Redevelop plans for Wakefield, Robinhood and Gloster Parks.
* Development of "State -Of- The - Art" trail head at the intersection of William der and
Gateway Trails
* Pursuit of Grant monies for recreational and park projects.
Implement Land Management Plan.
* Ensure long -term ecological integrity in all city parks and open spaces.
* Continue to foster and develop joint ventures with other gov agencies ie. Tri- District
School and St. Paul Water Utilities.
Long -Term Goals (1996 -2000)
* ..Continue search for park sites in Oakridge neighborhood.
Establish interconnecting TraiVGreenway. System. throughout Maplewood.
* Identify future revenue sources beyond P.A.C. charges.
* Development. of Maplewood Community Center Park, Kohlman Overlook and
Linwood/Highwood areas.
Park maintenance and development accomplished durit►g 1995 through our Capital Improvement
Plan is attached as an addendum to this report.
endives
A Maps
Acquisitions
Master Plans
.ADDENDUM
1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
EDGERTON PARK
Volleyball Standards for Community Center Gymnasium ..........................5 3 9 000
KOHL PARK
Land 240
RA&VESTPARK
Trail Extension and Water Drainage, Grading .............. ..............................5 3
NATURE CENTER
Master Plan 1
AMBER HILLS LAND ACQUISITION
Land Acquisition Purchased Through School District # 622 0. .....................$12,500
Open Space .................................................................... ............................... 37
IYSUMSDEVELOLMENT
misc Improvements Including 'Benches, Gazebo,
Drinking Fountains and Irrigation Improvements o o*****000*0000"****000000***********$. 22,271
OMMUJNTr.CY CENTER TtAIL
Construction. of Trai1...... ............................... N... NNN...... .......,..N...................5 91,110
AMBER HILLS KAYSER ACQUISITION
Land Acquisition. ii..• ................. 1...••.. 1................................. .......i...N...........5209,328
WESTERN HILLS PARK
Major Park Renovation...... N.........,................... N... N ....... ..........N.N......N....ZS7,479
MM ERPARK
Major Park Renovation .............. N. N.............................. ...........,..................3 49,822
.7
g
= 71
0
R
y
i
a
N
x
a
�*'
0
�~
z�
t
1 � �
fw -4 �l
�• � � 1 l� � .
/0
sit
�1
A
•mow i s. •r s�•• And Paso"
1 LAIC
•
lop
SIM
.7
g
= 71
0
R
y
i
a
N
x
a
�*'
0
�~
z�
t
1 � �
fw -4 �l
�• � � 1 l� � .
/0
sit
�1
A
•mow i s. •r s�•• And Paso"
1 LAIC
• ♦ ,dk*
so
A �
�• , 1 AA � � ` • A- -AAA; ` ,
• / q�
.Loop
..� , ,,•• %. - • .........�.� ••• ..
�� �/� �� • � � • � � N ��r Armor .
• ` eke woe
low
• � . ��� Arm •
N
so
I lip
16's 0
.0
bow
{
io
• I A o a r
f IL
f it
Ilk
0 VA
of f
WL Is
tam I men
1 `
@!A s..
\ � 1
• •
A \ I VIII l � I" \
"'� r ... +� err `..r � � •rr � .� it 1
r
ZL
M
S
guA
.�na. soft* . • '• .��s..r
am
M Gum.
ms's w
Ab
r -
1
. t -t r•r
1 AMA
.. /�
iMiTMATE
%W am dim 4
1
1 •
� v
rr,�r
SEA "A "
MAY ARAA CC*MONEN'1S
1 Nr'AIIR.'ra�1�1�
t t,w.V. 09 No MIS
OMOWwRwA"DILfuuw
i fouAs
{ I
W"GKX.NK
omr t t rz'
NO Dow* !um
I 4w oau" W ILM
W atNW"
I rus.T�unt
! rrr�tfnarat��
I Sr WVOW w1N.71 MEN
i M' cm" mr CIAM t
1 tic SAC IM MW
i t �cvw� 1to�1�t'Ilt. t�l1�
i V IMAM= aw„MM tAMM
I w omew r ^pmwf mom
mop I
1 tr Wit.! Yo MM ■�lA1
rI �KA'"
tr - 1 rac"M i n t rrMins
1 N'rC�lyd.TQAMWM
1 /�t1t� t+�toc�a �►R1Al�R��
1 waf1t.sllft
3r I AMW hAIM
AAA
1 w1l11t1 a tam
M n AVT dul v sw "m wR OLT a 9 sm
1 /Rfttsrs Argo �
1 /t1t1,t10�t SPNM KIM
Clio
01
:' IP
W,
+ � � �. �, �4 1111
2 -Cb I K jvl�
AS
0
14
Eal ��Rft:
amil �
4t t'. '.i i --
W 100 �-A . 4 6 LN
a .'` �' • .°,,: i i III � �'.� � � � . � � 1 �
so It
'011A a I �A 44i
r. zck 7
It
f -
" NIT A
4 1
6 '*'A Wig It
Now IN owl
A
UL
it
I 'If
Zoo
w- Jim 14
P'p dig
. MW
A 1 44-1
L
-4
P
1 � ���.. of . v .
���!"�. �> r ye �
-'Soo
ALTERNMUL Z
SCAUM I•im OW
0 2010 so 12(
WffM SCALE IM FEET
MAPLEWOOD PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEMBERS
'TERM OF ATTENDANCE EXPIRATION
PETER FISCHER, CHAIRPERSON
5/93
100$
12/31/95
2443 STANDRIDGE AVENUE
MAPLEWOOD 3+IIJ 55109
JEANNE EWALD,VICE— CHAIRPERSON
1/88:
91$
.12/.31/96
1744 RUTH STREET
MAPLEWOOD MN 55109
DONALD CHRISTZANSON,SECRETARY
11/77
91$
12/31/96
1111 EAST COUNTY ROAD C
MAPLEWOOD MN 55109
BONNIE QUALLEY
12/74
64$
12/31/97
2089 BEAM AVENUE
MAPLEWOOD HN 55109
CATHY TOLLEFSON
6/89
9$
12/31/97
2587 POND AVENUE
MAPLEWOOD NN 55119
Z+tARABETH TII+IIMERS
3/94
'7 3 $
12/31/97
1621 E. SANDHURST DRIVE
MAPLEWOOD 1+IId 55109
CAROI+YN PETERSON
10/94
91$
12/31/95
1999 JACKSON STREET
MAPLEWOOD MN 55117
RICK BRANDON
3/95
100$
1622 EAST COUNTY ROAD C
NAPLEWOOD MN 55109
CRAIG BRANNON
5/95
100•
12/31/95
2927 WALTER STREET
MAPLEWOOD MN 35109
SUSAN KRAEMER
3/94
50$
(RESIGNED)
1778 ONACREST CURVE
4/20/95
MAPLEWOOD !�1 55117
r 0000, 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CDRB —Rules of Procedure Update
DATE: November 27, 1995
INTRODUCTION
Action b Cos.c1.
Endorse
Modified.......
Rejecte
Date
Staff is requesting that the community design review board (CDRB) revise their Rules of
Procedure. The CDRB has not revised their rules since February 9, 1987.
PROPOSED CHANGES
The proposed changes are primarily to update the terminology to the accepted manner currently
used. For example, deletions are made from any references to gender. Changes would also be
made to make the Rules more concise and to have the rules match the CDRB's actual practice,
such as:
1. Rescheduling meetings due to holiday or voting day conflicts — The proposed revision would
state that the meeting would be rescheduled.. It would no longer require rescheduling to the
following Tuesday. There may be occasions to meet on a different day or to even cancel the
meeting if there are no applications awaiting review.
2. There is no need to follow a specific review format (for example, first reviewing utilities, then
drainage, then traffic flow, etc, as the Rules require). The CDRB reviews all aspects of the
plans submitted, but should not be required to discuss them in any particular order.
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL REQUIRED
Code requires that any changes made to the Rules of Procedure be submitted to the city council
for approval
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the changes to the community design review board Rules of Procedure.
p: miscelkdrbrule. mem(6.2)
Attachment
CDRB Rules of Procedure
Attachment 1
COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
RULES OF PROCEDURE
I N A s:� ; i•
We, the members of the Community Design Review Board of the City of Maplewood, M
created pursuant to Article IV, Section 25 of the Code of Ordinances,-o hereby adopt the
following "Rules of Procedure," subject to the provisions of said Article, which is hereby made a
part of these Rules:
I. MEETINGS
A. All meetings s hall be held in the council chambers in Mapiewoo, City Hall the
, 1830 E. County Road 8, unless otherwise directed by the
chairperson s� or staff, in which case at least 24 hours notice will be given to all
members.
B. Regular meetings shall be held at 7 p.m. on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each
calendar month, provided that when the
fta. meeting falls on a
so
legal holiday or voting day such meeting shall be rescheduled
.00 iha Maw 6
.
C. Special meetings may be held upon call by the chairperson Gha or in his /her
absence, by the vice chaimerson spa, or by any other member with the
concurrence of two other members of the board with at least 48 hours notice to all
members.
11. QUORUM
A. Three members of the board shall constitute a quorum.
B. Any member who abstains from voting on a particular question because of possible
conflict of interest shall not be considered to be a member of the board for the purpose
of determining a quorum for the consideration of the issue.
C. Any action by the board shall require a ma„ lority vote of
the members present
Sete.
111. DUTIES OF THE CHAIRMAN
A. In addition to presiding at all meetings of the board, the chairperson eha shall
appoint such standing committees and temporary committees as may be required, and
such committees will be charged with the duties, examinations, investigations, and
inquiries relative to subjects assigned by the chairperson aR.
BO No standing or temporary committee shall have the power to commit the board to the
endorsement of any plan or program without the express approval of the board.
IV. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
A. The chairperson , vice chairperson and such officers as the board
-- . may decide are needed, shall be appointed at the second meeting of each
calendar year and will serve until their successors have been duly appointed
and qualified.
B. In the absence of the chairperson charrrra�rr, the vice c_ hai,rgerson shall
perform the duties of the chairperson i In the event
that both are absent, the members present shall
elect a chairpe, rson cl I pro tem.
V. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD VACANCIES
A. The following are grounds for recommending to the city council the dismissal renlovai
of a community design review board member:
1. 11 i#q -orr Failure to serve, as shown by failure to attend six meetings in any
calendar year, without ttrr� good cause IS of 11ow11.
2. Resignation in writing.
3. Taking of-public office in Maplewood .
66M 0%
4. Moving Out of Map.ewooditq.
VI. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
A. In addition to carrying out the duties prescribed in city ordinance, the director or a-ft
designated replacement, shall:
1. -Prepare the agenda for each meeting � U.
2. Act as technical advisor to the board on in any matter
which - ntaq comes before the
board.
3. Make written recommendations to the board on matters such as, but limited
to, architectural plans., site plans, signage and land caging proposals.
U pone
} s
-2-
5. Schedule any matter with the citv council that.has been review by the beard that
requires city council approval.
VII. AGENDA
A. Copies of the agenda, together with pertinent staff reports and cop ies of -the minutes of
the p revious me P a ll B
ow%r p mee ting, shall be made available to
each member of the board not later than three days W%W ys prior to the next
scheduled meeting wneeo .
B. The agenda format shall read as follows:
asp
1. Call to Order
2. Roll. Call
3. Approval of Minutes
4. Approval of Agenda
5. Unfinished Business
6. Design Review
7. Visitor Presentations
8. Board Presentations
9. Staff Presentations
10. Adjournment
C. The board .shall..only consider items on the a enda. '
big the Reafd-.
D. The board's review shall include but shall not I Le limited to the followin items:
1. Site Considerations:
a. Utilities '
b. Drainage
2 2 r 4 v%aft den"
c. Landscaping - fence, screening �
d. Traffic flow, parking and driveway access
e. Trash receptacle enclosure
f. Building setbacks
_3-
's -aa€e
g � security lighting
h.
(2) Access for emergency vehicles
2. Architectural Considerations:
a. Materials — compatible with neighboring buildi such as block metal
9 9 ,
brick, etc., including colors.
b. Building aesthetics — compatible with nei hborin buildings, scale of '
g g g , building,
size in relation to surroundings, flat roof vs. pitched roof, etc.
c. Location and concealment of outside equipment, e.g. air conditionin .and
outside storage. yards.
Vlll. AMENDMENT OR SUSPENSION Of RULES
A. Any of the foregoing rules may be te m p orarily suspended b a m Y P Y p Y � y vote of the
members present.
B. The "Rules of Procedure" may be amended at an r e g ula r meetin -f -#e
•
Y � g hans
majority vot My a
IX. Rules of Order
Except as herein provided, Robert's Rules of Order. •
f .
shall be followed. • in
p: misce11Vules3.wpd(6.2)
-4-
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD.
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPL.EWOOD, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 9, 1996
A. Rules of Procedure Update
Secretary Ekstrand presented the staff report. Boardmember Robinson fact shrubbery should
part of landscaping under site considerations. She also asked f traffic flow
be Included as pa P 9 i these
irrigation stems should. be included sn this update. Secretary Ekstrand said and Lawn sy
sterns could be included but added that the listings in this update were meant to be
generalized, not all inclusive.
n' Design Review. Board recommend adoption
Boardmember Berggren moved the Community g
g
of
the changes to the Community Design Review Board Rules of Procedure.
Boardmember Vidyashankar seconded. Ayes —all
F -s
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike McGuire, Cit Mana
FROM: Melinda, Coleman , Communit Development Director
SUBJECT: Bud Adjustment—Rec Fund
DATE: Januar 23, 1996
A c - L i on b C cu. - -,L c -- � - I .
Endorsed—
Modif ierl-----
Re j ected------
Date
.INTRODUCTION
'There is not enou mone ih.. the rec fund to pa for th December bill from Gopher
Disposal. The bud is short b $1615. The director of finance recommends that we pa this
bill from the 'fund bal in the rec pro funds
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize pa from the rec fund balance of $1615 to pa for the balance of the 1995
rec costs.
AGENDA NO.
AGENDA REPORT
Aot by V ou.i....c �. P
TO City Manager
Endorse
FROM: Finance Director
Igodified.. —
-
s
�e� octed-...-
Dat .__
RE: CARRYOVER OF 1995 APPROPRIATIONS TO 199`6
DATE: February 6, 1996
It has been past practice to permit the carryover from one
ear to the next of unsp ent monies
y p
for specific purposes. This involves reductions in the 1995 Budget and corres responding
9
increases in the 1996 Budget.
Department heads have requested the following eneral Fund carryovers:
overs: Y
1995 Acct. No.
Department Amount
1996 Acct. No.
For
City Manager's $ 5
101- 101 -4490
Second -half a ment for community
y
survey
1,000
101- 102 -4630
Desk chair for City Manager
Y g
115
101 - 104 -4390
Human Relations Commission event
890
101- 105 -4480
Veteran's Preference Hearin g costs
10
101- 119 -4490
Human resources i ntern
(101 -102 -4020)
Finance 500
101- 201 -4630
Computer software for project
p p J
management
2
101- 202 -4630
Annual financial report software
City Clerk 5
101 -303 -4730
Drivers license icture taking g area
Public Safety 1
101- 401 -4170
Criminal code and traffic books
5
101- 405 -4010
Fire Chief office furnishings
(101- 404 -4630)
575
101 -405 -4010
Fire Chief firefighting turnouts and
(101 -404 -4240)
uniforms
AGE DA REPORT Carryover of 1995 Appropriations to 1996
Febru ' 6, 1996
Page
1995 Acct. No.
Department
Amount
(1996 Acct. No.)
For
Public Works
29
101- 501 -4490
Study to meet requirements for old
city dump
6,170
101- 502 -4180
Materials to continue streets crack
sealing
4
101 -506 -4759
Installation of additional street lights
Parks & Rec.
8
101- 117 -4490
Energy audit
(101- 115 -4490)
Community Dev.
1
101- 701 -4010
Costs of dept. head to attend
(101- 701 - 4390)
national conference
$82,600
General Fund Total
In addition to the above, carryover requests have been received for the following other funds:
1995 Acct. No.
Fund Amount (1.996 Acct. No.) For
Hazardous
Materials Fund 31 545
Community Center
Construction Fund 21,590
Open Space Land
Acquisition Fund 55
204- 112 -xxxx Development of hazmat
response team
All accounts This the total amount of Community
in 409 Center construction money
remaining in the fund. These funds
will be used for additional furniture
and equipment purchases that are
being recommended by the users
and operations personnel.
410 -4710 This is the total amount of the Open
Space funding that remains in the
1995 budget. The process of
acquiring properties will continue
in 1996. Funds that remain at year-
end will be used in the following
year for acquisition of open space
until all funds have been expended.
AGE DA REPORT Carryover of 1995 Appropriations to 1996
February 6, 1996
Page 3
1995 Acct. No.
Fund. Amount (1996 Acct. No.l For
Street Construction
State Aid Fund 21 404 -4759 Lydia Avenue pedestrian signals
$129,160 Total for other funds
It is recommended that the City Council approve these carryover requests.'
P:\Fl NAN C E \W P\AG N \B U DG CAR R
AGENDA REPORT
Ac ( .. ;. I.,
TO: City Manager
Modif i e d..„
FROM: Finance Director
/92&16� Date
RE: TRANSFERS FROM TAX INCREMENT FUND
DATE: February 1, 1996
990
It is proposed that the Council authorize the appropriate 1995 budget adjustments and 1995
transfers totaling $1,670,592.86 from the Tax Increment Fund to the Debt Service Funds and
Community Center Project Fund.
BA(:KG. �OD
Annually transfers are mane from the Tax Increment Fund to finance expenditures in other
finds. The 1995 transfers from the Tax' Increment Fund will finance the following
expenditures:
1. Debt service costs on tax increment bonds totaling $1,262,511.24.
2. Community Center construction costs totaling $408,081.62
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council approve the appropriate 1995 budget adjustments and
transfers totaling $1,670,592.86 from the Tax Increment Fund to the Debt Service Funds and
Community Center Project Fund.
PAFINANCE\WP\AGN\TIF95.WPD
FILE NAME: TIFTR ANS
LOCATION: FIND'IR., C:1123R5W\MISC
DATED: 01-Feb-96
PREPARED BY: DF
1995 TRANSFERS OUT FROM TAX INCREMENT FUND 9401
(To eliminate cash deficits)
OPERATING TRANSFERS:
321 1989 Tax-Exempt Tax Inc. Bonds
326 1992 Tax Increment Bonds
328 1993 Tax Increment Bonds
RESIDUAL EQUITY TRANSFERS:
409 Communit Center Project Fund
Total transfers
12-29-95 BALANCE IN ACCT. 401-1010 =
JE to record General Fund admin. char
Transfers listed above
17:48
0 450,015 408,081.62 408t0182 409 -999 -3998
0 450,015 408,081.62 408,082 401 -999 -4998
1- 11608,475 1,670,592.86 512,133
1
0.00 Alread recorded b J 1254
'1
(1,670,592.86
55,288.34
BUDGET CHANGES:
1995
1995
1995
BUDGET
RE-EST.
ACTUAL
AMOUNT
ACCT. NO.
18,600
18,600
15,068.10
(31532
321 -999 -3999
810,690
310,690
326,553.46
15,863
326 -999 -3
829,170
829,170
920,890.08
91,720
328 -999 -3999
11158,460
11158,460 11262,51
104,051
401 -999 -4999
0 450,015 408,081.62 408t0182 409 -999 -3998
0 450,015 408,081.62 408,082 401 -999 -4998
1- 11608,475 1,670,592.86 512,133
1
0.00 Alread recorded b J 1254
'1
(1,670,592.86
55,288.34
AGENDA NO. r_
AGENDA REPORT
Action b Council:
TO: Cit Manager Endorsed - _,� Rejecte
Modified.......
FROM: Finance Director �OLU4- -i Data
RE: BUDGET CHANGES FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING OF
CAREFREE COTTAGES -PHASE I
DATE: Februar 2, 1996
PROPOSAL
It is proposed that two 1995 bud chan be approved for the Tax Increment
Fund: (1) increase estimated revenues b $61,550 in account 401-3015 and ( 2 )
increase estimated expenditures b $61,550 in account 401-4820.
BACKGROUND
Qn 6-28-93 the Council approved the development a for tax-increment
financin of the Carefree Cotta pro This a provided the
developer with the benefit of pa as y ou g e tax increment financin fora fifteenew
y ear period. Instead of receivin the proceeds from a tax increment bond issue,
the developer receives the tax increment revenues semi-annuall from the cit
after the are received from the count For 1995, this amounts to a refund of
85 %0 of the propert taxes paid, b Carefree Cotta
The first pa of tax increments was recentl made to Carefree Cotta
This pa was omitted from the bud because the timin was dependent on
a number of factors that were difficult to pro Also, the tax increment revenues
were omitted from the bud because the pa of them to the developer was
also omitted. Since the receipt and pa of the tax increments occurred in
1995 it would be beneficial to ad the 1995 bud now.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that two 1995 bud chan be approved for the Tax
Increment Fund: ( 1 ) increase estimated revenues b $61,550 in account 401
3015 and ( 2 ) increase estimated expenditures b $61,550 in account 401-4820.
PAMNANCEWMCAREFREEMPD
AGENDA NO. � 0Z
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Cit Mana
Finance Director 00—
Action by Council
Endorsed,......
Modified,...
Re ected.....
TRANSFERS TO CLOSE DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 317
AND 319
Januar 29, 1996
PROPO
It is proposed that effective 12-31-95 ( 1) Debt Service Fund 319 for the 1989
Improvement Bonds be closed b a transfer of $5,568.71 from Debt Service
Fund 317 for the 1983 1mprovement Bonds , (2 Debt Service Fund 317 for the
1983 Improvement Bonds be closed b a transfer of the remainin balance to
Debt Service Fund 325 for the 1992 Improvement Refundin Bonds and ( 3 )
that the appropriate bud adjustments be approved.
BACKGR
The final principal and interest pa have been made on the 1983 and
1989 Improvement Bonds. Accordin to State law (M.S.A. 475-61,
Subdivision 4), an surplus remainin in a debt- service fund after the bonds
and interest have been paid ma be appropriated to an other g eneral
purpose. The remainin cash balance in Debt Service Fund 317 for the 1983
Improvement Bonds is $240,106.82. Debt Service Fund 319 for the 1989
Improvement Bonds has a cash deficit of $5,568.71.
The last ten debt service funds were closed b transfer of their remainin
balances to the Capital Improvement Projects Fund. In order to close Fund
319 the cash deficit must be eliminated. This should be done b a transfer in
from Fund 317. The remainin balance in Fund 317 should be transferred to
Debt Service Fund 325 rather than to the Capital Improvement Projects Fund.
0
This Is because there are not an lar capital improvement projects
scheduled to be financed b the Capital Improvement Pro Fund over the
next five y ears. However, lar tax levies are scheduled for Debt Service Fund
325. Therefore, a transfer to this fund will decrease these future debt service
tax levies.
RECOMMENDATION
It recommended that effective 12-31-95 (1) Debt Service Fund 319 f the
1989 Improvement Bonds be closed b a transfer of $5,568.71 from Debt
Service Fund 317 for the 19831mprovement Bonds , (2) Debt Service Fund
317 for the 1983 Improvement Bonds be closed b a transfer of the remainin
balance to Debt Service Fund 325 for the 1992 Improvement Refundin Bonds
and (3) that the appropriate bud adjustments be approved.
P:\FINANCE\WP\AGN\DEBT8389.WPD
AGENDA NO. F' / 3
Actio,n b
AGENDA. REPORT �� ������� � ,}.
TO: Cit Mana Rejected.,
�ate._
FROM: Finance Director R041t.�'_
RE-. JOINT POWERS PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH THE
CITY OF ST. PAUL
DATE: Februar 5, 1996
.
PROPOS
It is proposed that the attached resolution be adopted to authorize the
e xecution of a joint powers purchasin a with the Cit of St. Paul.
BACKGROUND
The attached November 14 letter contains information which indicates that a
new electronic information service is now available, to make it easier for us
to use St. Paul and Ramse Count contracts for purch Presentl
Maplewood is one of the few cities in Ramse Count that has not executed
a joint powers a with St. Paul for purchasin There is no char
for implementation of joint purchasin nor is there an annual fee like we pa
tQ the State of Minnesota. However, there is a fee of $10 per master
contract that we use.
Since several Maplewood department heads expressed an interest in
purchasin on St. Paul and Count contract s, I re a j oint purchasin
a for execution. The attached Januar 22 letter indicates that the
C i# y of St. Paul has authorized execution of an j oint purchasin a
with Maplewood.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted to authorize the
execution of a j oint powers purchasin a with the Cit of St. Paul.
R ESOLUTION
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, that the appropriate Maplewood officials are
hereb authorized to execute the attached joint powers purchasin
a with the Cit of St. Paul.
PANNANCEWMAGNUOINTPURNM
JOINT PURCHASING AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this day of , 1996, by and
between the City of Saint Paul (Ramsey County, Minnesota) and the City of Maplewood,
(Ramsey County, Minnesota).
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul and the City of Maplewood, pursuant to the provisions
Minnesota Statutes 471.59 are authorized to enter into an agreement to exercise jointly the
governmental powers and functions each has individually; and
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul and the City of Maplewood desire to combine their
purchasing functions for the purchase of equipment, materials, services, and supplies to secure
more favorable prices and conditions;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED, by and between the parties hereto as
follows:
1. The City of Saint Paul shall, pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Saint Paul City
Charter and applicable State Statutes, make joint purchases for both the City of Maplewood and
the City of Saint Paul of whatever same or similar equipment, materials, services, and supplies
are authorized and requested by both the City of Saint Paul and the City of Maplewood.
Similarly, the City of Maplewood shall make joint purchases for the two entities in accordance
with all applicable Statutes and policies.
2. Each party shall make payment directly to the vendor according to established
procedures.
3. Neither party shall assume any responsibility for the accountability of funds expended
by the other or the issuance of a purchase order by the other party.
4. Each party shall be separately accountable for its own expenditures of public funds
made hereunder.
5. After bids have been received by the designated purchasing department on behalf of
both entities, and awarded, each party shall enter into its own contract or agreement with the
vendor.
6. As mutually agreed upon, the parties may share the costs associated with the shared
bidding process.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Saint Paul and the City of Maplewood have
executed this agreement the day and year first above - written.
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, a Minnesota
Municipal Corporation
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a Minnesota
Municipal Corporation
By
Norm Coleman, Mayor
Department of Finance and
Management Services
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ulblyj
Assistant City Attorney
JOINT PURCHASING OM CE
CffY OF SAINT PAUL Room 280 G# �XFL
it Harsc ?eltphonc 612- 266 -4900
1S Wtst Xr1JogY Ba Fax 672 266 -8919
COUNTY OF RAMSEY, se;,�r pd►; M' � s1o2 -1a7.
NOV 1 4 i
1
November 14, 9 95
U "
T0; Local Government Purchasing Contacts
FROM: Linda J. Camp, Purchasing Systems Manager
RE: Q..g Electronic information Ser% ice
Last fall, the Sant Paul/Ramse ty Coun Joint Purchasing Office launched a new electronic
• a wa to rovide our vendors and customers with more timely access to
information service as _ y p
. ation.. Called " , gl' te service Snakes use of fax -on- demand
and contractnn uiform Q h
bidding g
a fax machine or microcomputer, Bas ed
technology and allows users
to download documents to
our inau al are expanding our offerings in 1996.
. -on the success of the system in gun' y ear, we
• overnments fr uentl •ask us for copies of our purchasing documents
..since many other local g . e � y
T this •information about the expanded Quad or. want to make use of our contrac_ ts, I am senduig you
offering.
As of January L 1996, th ere will be a new "tier" of service developed just for local governments.
Subscrib
ers to this tier will be able ' to retrieve the following:
• Copies of Saint Paul and Ramsey County purcbasing Policies and forms
• Copies of Saint Paul and Ramsey County purchasinS bulletins
• Lists of buyers, aad their phone numbers and commodity assignments
• Copies of most Saint Paul and Ramsey County bidding documents (specifications,
addenda, tabulations, etc.)*
- � Copies of some Saint Paul Public Schools bidding documents*
• Directory of Saint Paul and Ramsey County certified Targeted Vendors*
• Saint Paul aad Ramsey Couaty master contracts
There will be a small charge for the documents listed above with an asterisk ($10 per Master
Contract, $1.00 for each other chazge document). The others will be available at no charge.
These dollars will be used to offset the costs of setting up the contracts and operating this system.
Plea note that anyone ;; a si u for this service but that your agency must have an executed
. se ,y gn p
• Powers A eement with the C . _of Saint Paul to use our Master Contracts. .
Joust gr ty . (more)
Purrhas�rrY for: ,► co,m►
City or saint Paul, Water Utft Chic Center Authority, Public Housing Agency, Port Authority, County of Ramsey
•
P
•�Subscri Lions" will be available m increments as o oyes:
* $ 50 0$ 150 ♦ $300 35W_
�•
$100 $200 $400
- currents until .
You will be able to retrieve free and charge do our account balance is used up
y
a renew in an amount at any tune.
You may y
• add bidding documents to the system
We are also offering other governments the opportunity to a
ed in exploring this option, please contact the at 266 -8920,
for easy retrieval. If you are interest P
• - . • contracts b virtue of a Joint. _Powers
If our agenc is a user of Saint Paul and Ramsey County y v
y g y . ' You'll be able to access
nco a you to consider signing up for thus new service. Yo
Agreement, I e , y
time day or n If ou don t currently hold a Joint Powers Agreem ent
our documents at any y � y .
but would like to Tease check off the space included below.
with Saint Paul for purchasing, � P
.. can be reached at 256 -8911 if you have
Joanne Erdman is the administrator of the system. She
technical questions.
. _ this fo with our check made
Please rovide all of the information requested below and return rm, y
t Joanne Erdman at 280 City Hall/Court House,
payable to City of Saint Paul o 15 west Kellogg
Boulevard.. nt Pa ul, - . MN 55 102.' Vard,. . �•
�7 ~1 l
• Government Tier at the following level:.
I am interested in subscribing to the Local Governor
$50 $100 .___.... S 1 5 0 $200
$300 $400 $500
Agency Name
Address
Contact Person
Phone Number
Fax Number
(Please include your area code) .
. r
Amount t Enclosed a packet of u�:ictions
once Y our order is processed.
Date Transmitted
intere in exe-cutin a Joint Powers Agreement for purchas with the City
My .agency is intere g .
of Saint
Governments Who Hold Joint Powers A
With the Cit of Saint Paul = r:
11/9/95
Cities C o—u—n a e s
Circle Pines
Chisa
Cotta Grove
Da
Eg an
Eden Prairie
Falcon Hei
Finla
Hastin
Inver Grove Hei
Lauderdale
Lino Lakes
-Lindstrom
Mendota Hei
Minne
Monticello
Mound
Bri
New Hope
North Saint Paul
Oakdale
Oak Park Hei
Pine City
ros e viRe.
Rush Cit
Saint. Anthon
Shoreview
White Bear Lake
White Bear Lake .Township
Woodbur
Wy o min g
Anoka
Hennepin
Washin
.Other
Metro pol, Council
• Public Housin -A g enc y ( Saint Paul)
,.....,.State of-Mmnes6ta---'..._,-, A 46
'Universit Mihnesotal'
JOINT PURCHASING OFFICE
CITY OF SAINT PAUL 15 west Kellogg Boulevard
gg a d
COUNTY OF RANI S EYSaint Paul, Minnesota 55102 -1674
January 22, 1996
Dan Faust, Finance Director
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Faust:
Room 280 City Hall/Court House Telephone 612-266-8900
Fax 612 - 266 -8919
This is to follow up our recent correspondence related to a Joint Powers Agreement for
purchasing between the City of Saint Paul and the City of Maplewood. Since we last were in
touch, the Saint Paul City Council has passed a resolution authorizing the execution of such an
agreement. For your information, I have attached a copy of the resolution.
I am also enclosing two copies of the Agreement to be signed. Once your City Council has
passed a similar authorizing agreement, please have the appropriate officials execute both copies,
of the agreement and return both to me. I'll collect the signatures on our end, and return one
copy to you for your records. I would also like to have a copy of your resolution authorizing the
agreement.
Thanks for your assistance. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 266 -8920.
Sincerely,
Linda J. Camp
Purchasing Systems Manager
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
14
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
0 P?
"t I G A I..-
Presented By
Referred To
Council File #
Green Sheet #
RESOLUTION
SAINT AUL, MINNESOTA
1
Committee: Date
RESOLVED, that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 471.59, commonly referred to as the "Joint
Powers Act," the proper City of Saint Paul officials are hereby authorized and directed to execute
the attached joint powers purchasing agreements with the City of Maplewood and with Scott
County, said agreements providing for the joint purchase of equipment, materials, services, and
supplies as needed, copies of said agreements to be kept on file and/or record in the Department
of Finance and Management Services.
Requested
by Department of:
Bl ake
Yeas
Nays Absent
tR
�/
uer.in
Finance &
Management Services - Purchasing
H a rr3 s
✓'
Me cca r
.�-
Rettman
✓
un e
By:
%001
Adopted by C
cil: Dat 3 /
Form A
ved b Ci t orney
Adoption C rt'fied
by C c' ecretary
By:
By:
Approved y M
B
or• Da e
Approved b Mayor fo Submission to
PP Y Y
Counci
�. _1�
B Y
1 __
AGENDA NO. r`&
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Cit Council
FROM: Cit Mana 7 YCL
RE.- NON-UNION SALARY RANGES
DATE: Januar 29,1996
lid b the Council in November,
The Non-Union Pa Plan Guidelines approve
1990 provide that salar ran ( not individual's salaries be ad on
J Ist of each y ear b that y ears "Stanton Surve Summar of Salar
Increases b Government Groupin for suburbs over 10,000. Movement
within the salar ran is based on experience and performance.
increases occur on the emplo anniversar date.
Since the ran are adjusted on Jul Is #, this .creates a disparit between
emplo that have an emplo anniversar date durin the first six
months versus emplo that have an emplo anniversar date
durin the last six months To eliminate this problem, it is recommended
that the pa plan be amended as follows:
Salar ran ( not individual's salaries) be adjusted on Januar I of
each y ear b the precedin y ear's increase as indicated in the
"Stanton Surve Summar of Salar Increases b Government
Groupin for suburbs over 101000.
C:XWPW1N60\AGN\PAYP LAN .WPD
AGENDA ITEM
TO:
City Manager
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Counc.,ii
Endors a ,��. ,.
Modified..
lReJ ecter ..
DaLte._
FROM: City Engineer
SUBJECT: Century Avenue North of Highwood Sanitary Sewer, Project 95 -11
Feasibility Study
DATE: February 6, 1996
The City of Woodbury's engineering consultant has finished the feasibility tud for the
Y Y
.subject project. The report is very complete and includes a detailed financing section.
Sanitary sewer, water main, and street restoration are included in the estimated cost for
the project.
Based on benefited front footage, the estimated construction costs have been split
between the City of Woodbury and the City of Maplewood. Maplewood's share of the
construction cost is estimated at $306,100. In addition, the City f Woodbury would
Y Y
expect property in the City of Maplewood to pay an area charge for sanitary s ewer and
water main equivalent to that paid by property in the City of Woodbu It has not et
. Y v y
been divided whether that charge may be $1,320 per acre or $1,640 per acre. It is
evident from the estimated front footage assessment rates that the street replacement
is quite expensive. Discussions about cost and financing are continuing at the staff
level with the City of Woodbury.
No city council action is requested or required at this time. However, it would be
beneficial for the council members to familiarize themselves with the study and the
issues involved in this project. Over the next several months alternative financing
plans and proposals will be presented to the council for their consideration. This
project cannot go ahead until the Cities of Maplewood and Woodbury agree ree on some
mutual financing proposal.
KGH
jc
Attachment
AGENDA ITEM r"1
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
City Manager
City Engineer
Action by Council o
Endorse
Modifi e
Rejected.
Date
Memorandum of Understanding— Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed
D i stri ct
February 5, 1996
For several years the City of Maplewood has been an active participant in the Phalen
Chai of Lakes Watershed Project. As ou may recall this watershed project was
Y Y � p J
funded by a series of McKnight Foundation grants and has been instrumental in
addressing a number of natural resource issues in the chain of lakes.
Not only has staff been active on technical advisory groups but the city has also
appointed Will Rossbach and Jack Frost from the lannin commission to represent the
p 9 p
city on the natural resources board for the project. It is through this project that the cit
has gotten involved with the wetland buffer ordinance that it recently adopted, the city's
p Y
Innovative Storm Water Management Project through the LCMR grant, the city's
Ecological Classification Project funded by another McKnight Foundation grant. The
city's association with this project has reaped many environmental benefits within the
last several years.
In an effort to continue the good work already accomplished, the watershed district has
presented a Memorandum of Understanding between the watershed district and the
cities involved in the Phalen Chain of Lakes Watershed. This Memorandum of
Understanding is intended to continue the roductive relationship that has been
p p
established. Each city would be represented on the board, and the board would
operate for the benefit of the cities and the watershed as a whole. Will Rossbach has
volunteered to continue as the city's representative on the board.
The agreement does not require any specific financial involvement on the part of the
city. However, it is expected that the cities provide financial support for projects
requested by the city or that directly benefit the city. You may recall that in the 1996
budget, $10,000 was budgeted through the public works department to support this
effort.
The natural resources board and their staff has been instrumental in providing
additional staff analysis and recommendations on development proposals in
Memorandum of Understanding 2 February 5 1996
Maplewood. The environmental expertise provided b the natural resources board p p Y and staff
is not currently available at the city. It has been extremely helpful ful to'have that
expertise available.
It is recommended that the city council authorize the mayor to sign the Memorandum o
Y g _ f
Understanding on behalf of the City of Maplewood. Further, appoint Will Rossbach as
the city's representative beginning in March 1996,
KG H
jc,
1101f
lift
1902 E. County Road B
December 22, 1995
P H A L E N
C H A I N
OF LAKES
WATERSHED
PROJECT
Maplewood MN 55109 ♦ ph: 6121777 -3665
Mayor Gary Bastian
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55117
Dear Mayor Bastian:
In late 1994, the Maplewood City Council voted to endorse the management plan for the
Phalen Chain of Lakes Watershed Project and join other local governments and
organizations in a partnership to implement the plan. Our Steering Committee thanks you
for this expression of confidence and support for our project. The Committee has decided
to continue its work with a new name - -the Natural Resources Board for the watershed- -
housed at the local level, beginning in 1996. Enclosed please find a Memorandum of
Understanding, similar to the Partnership Agreement you adopted last year, that continues
this relationship.
We are writing to request that the Council sign the agreement to continue to participate in
the Project, and appoint a representative to the Natural Resources Board by February 9, if
possible. A member of your City Council or Planning Commission will probably best
represent the interests of the City in the Board's discussions, and in turn be able to
communicate 01,11r activities to the City. (The current Maplewood representatives to our
project are Will Rossbach and Jack Frost.) An appointment by February 9 will allow us to
convene the new Board in early March. The Board members will be appointed to three -
year terms, beginning in March, 1996. The Board will develop its own schedule for
meetings and work plan, based on the interests and schedules of the new members. Please
send a letter that provides the name, address, and daytime phone number of your
representative to the project address, shown above.
We look forward to continuing to work with you and the other cities In our Watershed on
projects like the Maplewood Stormwater Project, and Open Space policies and management
plans that will be completed this spring. Ken Haider has already included a budget item to
support continuing activities with the Watershed Project in the City's Public Works budget
for 1996. These projects benefit community residents and the environment, and go far
beyond the work of the watershed districts. Enthusiastic representatives from local
communities and organizations have been key to the success of the project to date, and will
continue to be important to our future. Please call Sherri Buss, the Project Manager, at
777 -3665, if you have questions or need more information. Thanks again for your
support!
S i cer ly,
Dana Larsen, H. B. Fuller Co. and
Co- chair, Phalen Chain of Lakes Watershed
Project Steering Committee
Mark Gernes, Izaak Walton League
and Co- chair, Phalen Chain of Lakes
Watershed Proj. Steering Committee
H A L E N
C H A I N
1
+ OF LAKES
WATERSHED
mu*,*00 NNW
� - -.� P R 0 j E C T
7902 E. County Road !3 ♦ Maplewood MN 55109 ♦ ph: 6121777 -3665
... A Parme for Local Protectrofz and Management of Natural Resources
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Between Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District
and the Cities of Little Canada, Maplewood, North St. Paul, St. Paul, Vadnais Heights,
and White Bear Lake
This agreement is made between the Ramsey- Washingtoii Metro 'Watershed
District and the Cities within the District for creation and support of a Natural
Resources Board for the Plialen Chain of Lakes watershed and implementation
of the Plialen Chain of Lakes Watershed Natural Resources Plan,
The District and the Cities agree that:
1. They will create a Natural Resources Board for the Plialen Chain of Lakes
Watershed. The Board will include members representing each city and the
Watershed District. These members will appoint additional. members, including
at least one member each representing local business and development interests,
lake associations, environmental groups, educators, and the Ramsey County
Board and Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District. The Natural Resources
Board may appoint additional m e mb ers repr esenting other local organizations with
inter in the n resources of the Watershed at its discretion. Ex- officio (non -
voting) members of the Board will include the Administrator of the Watershed
District, and designees of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and
University of Minnesota Department of Landscape Architecture.
2. The Natural Resources Board's functions will include the following:
Coordinate implementation of the Phalen Cllain of Lak es Watershed
Natural Resources Plan;
Work with local governments and others in the Watershed to identify and
consider natural resources issues and recommend actions or
solutions;
Identify and implement demonstration projects that protect and enhance
the natural resources and educate citizens and local governments
abOLIt natural r esource issues in the w,-iterslied; and
P staff a ss istance to cities In reviewing deve lopment pr oposals,
developing open space plans, or other activities as requested, to
implement the recommendations of the Natural Resources Plan and
Board.
3. The Natural Resources Board will determine its own regular meeting schedule, to
fulfill the functions described above and provide services as requested to local
cornmunities and others, within the limits of available staff time and budget. Board
meetings will be held at a location in the Watershed, to be determined by the Board.
4. Board members will be appointed to three -year terms, with no more than one -third
m
of the Board ters ending in any one year. Board members may be re- appointed to
an unlimited number of terms.
6. The Board will adopt by -laws and elect its own officers as needed to fulfill its
illission. Proposed by-laws will be presented to city governments fur their review
and comment.
7. The Board will hire staff as needed and as funds are available to carry out its
mission and functions.
The Watershed District and its AdiTllnlstrator will provide office and administrative
support to the Board and its staff. The District will share financial support for the
Project with local governments, and will provide technical expertise on natural
resources issues and projects as available and requested by the Natural Resources
Board and staff.
9. The Cities will provide technical, in -kind, and/or financial assistance, as available,
to support the Watershed Project, its demonstration projects, and education and
outreach activities to local citizens to implement the Phalen Chain of Lakes
Watershed Natural Resources Plan.
The level and types of support from each city will be based on the proportion of the
city's geographic area in the Watershed District, costs of the projects and activities
sponsored with the city, and the level of service the city requests from the Natural
Resoul'CeS Board and its Staff.
10. The Natural Resources Board will report to the Watershed District Board and each
IIiCipating City Council and organizittion on in annual basis. This report will
include an annual report of Its activities, a proposed work plan and budget for the
next year, and a request for financial support for the next year.
The Watershed Board and each City Council will approve continuing participation
and its financial contribution to the project on an annual basis.
This agreement shall become effective upon signature of all duly authorized signatores, and
shall remain in effect until December 31, 1999, or before that date, until thirty days after
written notice of termination by the parties signing the agreement.
Roger Lake, President DATE
Ramsey -Wash 1ngton Metro Watershed District
Mike Faliey, Mayor City of Little Canada DATE
Gary Bastian, Mayor City of Maplewood DATE
William Sandberg City of North St. Paul DATE
Norm Coleman City of St. Paul DATE
Mark II.cider City of Vadnais Heights DATE
Pattie Butcher City of White Bear Lake DATE
President, DATE
Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District
r:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
AGENDA REPORT
Mike McGuire, City Manager
Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager
Resolution Authorizing Application for CDBG Funds
February 12, 1996
INTRODUCTION
AGENDA NO.
Action by Council.
Endorse
Mod.if i -
Re j ecte m �sommm .
Date
A few months ago, the City Council authorized modifications to be made to customer service
facilities in the Deputy Registrar area in City Hall. These changes are needed to bring this
service area in compliance with standards in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
In checking with Ramsey County Community and Economic Development, expenses for such
improvements are eligible for funding by the Community Development Block Grant Program
(CDBG). In order to be considered, the City must submit an application by February 16, 1996,
for unallocated CDBG funds at Ramsey County. The County requires a City Council resolution
to formalize the application.
According to application forms, grants are not available to cover all of the costs for
improvements. The Council approved a project for $5,700, and subsequent revisions may push
the cost to the $7,500 range. The application to be submitted requests $5,700 to fund the level of
improvement needed to comply with the ADA; the City's General Fund would be used to pay the
remaining expense.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing
submission of an application to Ramsey County for CDBG funding of ADA- related
improvements in the Deputy Registrar area of the City Hall.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
R.A.MSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION
TO RAMSEY COUNTY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
FUNDING FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR AREA IN CITY HALL
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is committed to making improvements to make its facilities and
services accessible to all residents as required by the American with Disabilities Act (ADA); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that certain physical modifications are necessary in the
Deputy Registrar area in the Maplewood City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the modifications are eligible for funding from the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by Ramsey County; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it wishes to request this funding assistance for these
modifications needed in Maplewood City Hall,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood that it
authorize the submission of an application to Ramsey County for CDBG funding of the ADA - related
physical modifications in the Deputy Registrar area in Maplewood City Hall.
Adopted February 12, 1996
Gary W. Bastian
Mayor
U
G . /
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:- Lexus Automobile Dealership
LOCATION: Highway 61
DATE: February 6, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
.,Cti by Cour!ci
r
E ndorse " ... . .. . . a.. ....e.�.�.
Modif
Da
Ryan Companies is proposing to build an 11,000- square -foot, one -story Lexus dealership north
of Venberg Tire on Highway 61. Refer to the maps on pages 8-10. The proposed building
would be rock -face concrete block, EIFS (exterior insulation finish system), a stucco -look material
and glass.
Requests
The applicant is requesting that the city council approve:
1. A 75 -foot wetland buffer variance. City code requires a 100- foot -wide wetland buffer along
the east edge of this site. The wetland buffer is to protect the adjacent wetland to the east,
classified by the Ramsey-Washington Metro Distr- ict -as -.a Class 1 wetland.- - -Class 1 wetlands
are those with conditions and functions most susceptible to human impact, are most unique,
have the highest community resource significance and similar characteristics. The applicant
is proposing a 25 -foot -wide buffer. Refer to the letter on pages 11 -12.
2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a maintenance garage. The sale of new and used
vehicles is permitted. City cod h owe v er, req a CUP for service and m of
cars.
3. Architectural, site and landscape plans.
BACKGROUND
April 10, 1995: The city council approved a RLS (registered land survey) for the Ramsey-
Washington Watershed District. The RLS created five tracts east of Highway 61 and south of
County Road D. Tract E, east of the proposed Lexus site, was shaped to follow the outline of the
existing wetlands. The watershed district ovens Tract E.
January 3, 1996: The Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District approved the grading
permit for Lexus. According to Mr. Pat Conrad of the watershed district, their assessment of the
adjacent wetland was to accept the proposed 25 -foot -wide wetland buffer. It is still the city's
decision whether or not to approve it, however.
January 8, 1996: The city council ordered a water main extension project to provide city water to
the proposed Lexus site.
January 9, 1996: The community design review board (CDRB) approved the site, landscaping
and architectural plans.
DISCUSSION
Wetland Buffer Variance
All setbacks meet code with the exception of the wetland setback to the east. The watershed
district has agreed with the proposed 25- foot - wide wetland buffer, provided the applicant improve
the quality of the buffer over its present condition. According to Cliff Aichinger of the watershed
district, the buffer around the wetland is very poor. Even though the .required buffer width is
proposed to be only 25 feet wide, its quality would be enhanced by the applicant over its current
state. Refer to Mr. Aichinger's letter on pages 16 to 21. The applicant's architect, RLK
Associates LTD, has agreed to meet. his requirements for improving the buffer. These
improvements include reshaping the slope to a maintainable 3:1 ratio, planting a native wetland -
sensitive seed mixture and controlling all the runoff with catch basins.
Conditional Use Permit
The city council should approve the CUP as the proposal would meet the findings for approval.
Since the city council ordered the extension of water to this site, approval of this CUP should be
contingent upon the city entering into a contract for the construction of the water main extension.
Design Considerations
The applicant proposes to store all refuse and parts within the building. There is no need,
therefore, for an outdoor trash enclosure. If trash is kept outside anytime in the future, a
.permanent outdoor enclosure would be required. The rock -face concrete block and EI FS exterior
would be compatible with the other three auto dealerships south along Highway 61.
Landscaping
The landscape plan is acceptable for the most part. The applicant, however, may need to add
plan_ tings along the wetland buffer if required by the watershed district. The applicant also should
sod. the boulevard instead of seeding it. Essentially, the boulevard is part of the front yard. The
applicant should treat it the same as their own property.
Billboard Setback
The future building expansion on the north end of the site would be too close to the existing
billboard. The sign code requires that billboards be at least 100 feet from an on -site building or
sign. According to the site plan, the billboard would be 37 feet from the future building. Lexus
would have to apply for another CUP to be allowed to build within 100 feet of this sign.
Parking
As proposed, the applicant is showing 117 parking spaces with the first phase —the code requires
55. The applicant would use the remaining 62 spaces for auto - inventory parking. The city
should require Lexus to post signs designating at least 55 parking spaces for their customers and
employees. They need to do this so they do not have a shortage of spaces and the congestion
typical of auto dealerships.
2
RECOMMENDATION
A. Adopt the resolution on page 22. This resolution approves a 75 -foot wetland buffer variance
for the proposed Lexus dealership on Highway 61. Approval is based on the following
findings:
1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship .because of circumstances
unique to the property and not created by the property owner. The 100 -foot -wide wetland
buffer requirement would make development of this site difficult. The difficulty was
created by the new ordinance.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, since the
applicant would improve the quality of the wetland buffer substantially over its present
state.
Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following:
1. Submitting a grading and landscaping plan subject to the requirements of the city staff
and the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for the wetland buffer.
2. Dedicating a wetland -buffer easement. This easement shall describe the boundary of the
buffer and prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. The
applicant shall record the deed for this easement before the city will issue a building
permit.
B. Adopt the resolution on pages 23-24. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for
a maintenance garage at the proposed Lexus dealership on Highway 61. Approval is based
on the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. Before the issuance of a building permit, the city must have a signed construction
contract for the extension of the water main to the Lexus site. The water system must be
operational before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
5. The future expansion is not allowed. The applicant must apply for design approval and
an amendment to the conditional use permit prior to building this expansion. The future
expansion must be at least 100 feet from the billboard.
C. Approve the plans (stamped December 7, 1995 and the site plan stamped February 1, 1996)
for proposed Lexus dealership on Highway 61 based on the findings required by the code.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
3
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building .permit for this
project.:
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall:
a. Dedicate and record a wetland- buffer easement. This easement shall describe the
boundary of the buffer prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping
within the buffer.
b. Submit a revised landscape plan providing for any planting and ground reshaping or
restoration of the wetland buffer as may be required by the Ramsey- Washington
Metro Watershed District. Replace the seed on the Highway 61 right -of -way with sod
if allowed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The right -of -way shall
have an in- ground lawn irrigation system unless prohibited by MnDOT.
3. Before the issuance of a building permit, the city must have a signed construction
contract for the extension of the water main to the Lexus site. The water system must be
operational before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
4. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Replace any property irons- removed because of this construction.
b. Install reflectorized stop signs at both exits, a handicap parking sign for each
handicap parking space and an address on the building.
C. Screen all roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property. (code
requirement)
d. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure, subject to staff approval, if there would be
outside trash storage. (code requirement)
e. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for the parking lot islands and the sodded
areas between the highway and the parking lot. Lawn irrigation in the right -of -way
may be waived if MnDOT will not allow it.
f. Post signs designating at least 55 customer and employee parking spaces.
g. Post one -way traffic signs for the narrow driveway beneath the canopy on the south
side of the building.
60 The future expansion is not allowed. The applicant must apply for design approval and
an amendment to the conditional use permit prior to building this expansion. The future
expansion must be at least 100 feet from the billboard.
8. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work.
The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
4
7. This approval does not include the signs. Signage will be reviewed by staff through the
sign permit process.
8. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
9. Traffic flow in and out of the Lexus dealership shall be reviewed by Mn DOT. Any site
plan change is subject to staff approval.
5
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 3.63 acres
Existing land use: Backyard Building Systems shed sales lot and Rainbow Play Systems
play equipment sales lot
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Owner - displayed used car sales lot
South: Venberg Tire
West: Highway 67
East: Vacant property (wetland)
PAST ACTION
May 28, 1991: The city council approved a variance waiving the requirement for in- ground lawn
irrigation and approved the site plan for Backyard Building Systems. They display their buildings
on the south half of the proposed Lexus site.
September 28, 1992: The city council approved a CUP for Rainbow Play Systems. They display
and sell backyard play equipment on the north half of the proposed Lexus site.
June 13, 1994: The city council approved a CUP fora used motor vehicle sales lot for Clarence
Lacktorin on the lot north of the proposed Lexus site.
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: M -1 (light manufacturing)
Zoning: M -1
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36- 151(b)(9)(c) requires a CUP for maintenance garages.
Section 36- 196(h)(3) of the wetland protection ordinance requires a 100 - foot -wide wetland buffer
for the proposed Lexus site adjacent to the lot to the east.
Section 36- 292(b)(2) requires that billboards be no closer than 100 feet to a commercial,
industrial or institutional building or an on -site sign.
Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve
Plans:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring,
existing or proposed developments, and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of
investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the
use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing. or proposed developments; and that it will not
create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of
the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive
development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan.
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good
composition, materials, textures and colors.
Findings for Variance Approval
State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance from the
zoning code:
1. Strict enforcement would. cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
property under consideration.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship ", as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be
put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the
landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the
variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations
alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the
terms of the ordinance.
Criteria for Conditional Use Permit Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards.
(See findings 1 -9 in the resolution on pages 23 -24.)
p :sec3Vexus2. mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. 2 -1 -96 Site Plan
4. Applicant's Narrative Statement for the Variance Request dated December 5, 1 995
5. Applicant's Conditional Use Permit Justification dated December 28,1995
6. Letter from Cliff Aichinger dated January 26, 1996
7. Variance Resolution
8. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
9. Plans Date - stamped December 7, 1995 and February 1, 1996 (separate attachment)
7
Attachment 1
VADWS HOGHM
bt
lb
.' .. r. , ,.., :.•• �. COUNT
COUNTY RD. _
3 4. o 1. o
2. 1. SUMMIT z g
,�.
2. COU IEW CIR. W =
6 C
Y r-
l j: •. �Z G , �• 3• a 4. LYDIA STCT. 4PO NS o
Ln
BEAM I�VE. •- v- o Z 9 ® AVE.
• •. BEAM
o' �•
•.. w ZA(4 0
0
cr o
cr a 0
202 0 3
� w w Markham °
O N •
Kohlmon v a ? Pond
Gervis' Lak co
4 j
Lake • • • KOHLMAN AVE �n
• • Z �
' • �v � W I cr
����� COUNTY ROAD t' W W � 3
C C�
1 CIR @ C rOP J
�IIDO 4R P� iii � '�` <"\, CT, c� ' ° t
W
Z
MN D.
• +• CO CO S 3 CON CT �`' W v) EDGEHILL
NNOR qVE. A OR 0 W
CT. NT �• � DEMONT AVE,
O
`� DEM � �' BROOKS �
J ►let
qyE, N BROOKS �
W
. AVE.
o BROOKS CT. to Z
.� SEX TA NT F
AVE. o
• ..: 12 W
GERVAIS o
�- AVE. GERVAIS
• F� � GE-
'Q GRANDVIEW AVE. i
, • • Pte. W
poo VIKING DR. Y
A
SHERREN AVE.
. -.. K ad Lake
... • . • • • v OP COPE AVE.
s . LARK CT. 4J AVE- C7 iii LARK < AVE.
VIKING DR. Keller ~� °
6.0 o s �n
W O L ake o CO. RD. N U LAURIE RD. ?Mr+rood LAURIE RD. °
o z
LEtAND RD. o R
LAURIE CT. �� o — SANDH URST Z AVE.
o Z Z
JUNCTION AVE. 4 ' 2 g � Y CO. RD.
&JRKF CT. 00 0 , BU
BURKE AV a - BU AVE. o BURKE AVE.
p (1 CHAMBERS ST ° (1 } AVE. m 0 C65
v ° 0
EIDRIDGE qv �� yip ELDR IDGE AVE. W '""' 64
LA. a . o
-.. •,,.m /4 COU RS E Sri AVE. BELMONT AVE. _ 'CR
2 51_1
� 100 ! 0 O
ifiCOUNTY ROAD D
i 132 to a ? �1' -o`o." c 100 .;s ' " 452.58 - - �� - iL a � r-
1322 ,
'l 4
,�2 q.308c• �s� 13
.t
'•3 �° 311Q ,r
8c .
' '•3 � �. -, 3090 Nsp S
UBSTATION
�c do 3• � �• o0
SPARKLE AUTO SALES
&
U Q o
N R ♦ �,
Law
130 64
P P ro)L A high Ter%Si oh P.
�--- -� F--.I ►.._ - o F---t t- -- 101 - -1 f- -----y O-- -----i
STD. OIL CO• P� F'E >
721. V
322 f
(_
lo M�►PLEI�IIOO
4D D �-i, - - - -- -- -- - - -- - - - --
oao
r OWNER TO OWNER
AUTOMART
•-�o
..... .. ...
40b T02.42
... ........: Q�
` RAINBOW PLAY SYSTEMS E
...... .... . :.•. :....•...
: :::.• : :.::.:. :::::.::: WETLAND
l
BACKYARD BUILDING SYSTEMS
to .: :.•::. ❖ : :..•. • a :::•::.: ::: :.•.• :. �
......... .. .............
............... ............
C6 : •.• : .; ........•.•.•.: � r
_- : : .• .., ::.•. �_ _ - - - - X05.94
00 174 .20 1 i - 1654.2 8
VENBERG TI
>�. I 466
r I No •
• •� � '~ I
R \1 Y
a . q S
a.. O LAN
•••
B
ss
N 2980
� I e 25 FT. Z 51 9 b E sin r t
` 1
I
�� ..• � S9ac o� _� �. 090„ -. I !
! DO1 s '
• ° :"•• NI �� 1
PROPERTY LINE 1 ZONING MAP
PROPOSED LEXUS SITE
9
4
N
WON
Attachment 3 -
t
LIGHT
o STANDARD TYP.
z 000e
f
PlAM SKIN -
1 •
D
fES -
SITE PLAN
,o
A
N
Mw
1
!
t
i
r
i
IIIIII LEGAL DESCRIPTION
i
TRACTS 0 AND C. R.L.S. NO. 525. ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED FILE
TH,EREOF. RAMSEY COUOM MINNESOTA.
-,
MI SITE DATA
SITE 3.63 ACRES' 158,172 SO. FT.
j j
-•
- -
ZONING: MI - LIGHT MAH+UFACTURING
!
1
Io _ -.. •-
- - - - - -.. - - - �
/.
SETBACKS: KOUIRED: PROVIDED:
'
r+' � D
f
(FUTURE PARKING `- t
(L>ASF�D LNES)
SPA
FRONT
BUILD G LOT is 47
SIDE 5• 110'
REAR NON-WET
100' 25'
4
(E�i►sT��'
PARKIIIG REQUIRED. 56 SPACES
_ 1
.- - -...- _ I
- - 1
'
PARKING PROVIDED: 120 SPACES
�-• ,
0 SITE NOTES
�
1. PER CITY, CODE. A 100 FOOT SETBACK IS REQUIRED TO A CLASS ONE .
FEET.
I
WETLQQ. THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSES A BUFFER WIDTH OF 25
m IMPROVED BUFFER YARD AND SLOPE WILL 8E THE RESULT OF THIS
1
DEVELOPMENT. A VARIANCE S BEING REQUESTED TO REDUCE THE BUFFER
FUTURE EXPANSION I
WIDTH TO 25 FEET.
�-
/
8.000 S.F.
PROPOSED SETBACK
2. SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO BE COORDINATED WITH ANTICIPAWD PUBLIC
Q
'
FROM 1MEILAND EDGE. MATER MAIN TO BE INSTALLED FROM BEAM AVENUE TO COUNTY ROAD '0'
25' TYP. PROVIDED THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZES THE PRO= AT A JANUARY S.
+
1996 PUBLIC HEARING.
3. REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR SOIL BORING LOCAT)ONS.
1
4. ALL DIMD90ONIS SHOWN ARE TO 119K OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERIMSE.
2D' I5
�./
'`- STwc EAaE
OF AF7LAND (TvP)
0
S CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF
EXISTING UTILITIE AND T FEATURES. SUCH AS EX GUTTER
PRIOR TO C
IMEDOIATELY
f ~
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF
CISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLANS.
'COPHER
17
1 S
a CONTRACTOR SHALL CONVICT STATE ONE CALL.' FOR UTILITY
LOCATIONS. 454- 0002. 24 HOURS PRIOR TO DWAVATION /CONSTRUCTION.
r I
7. ALL CURB AID GUTTER TO BE CONCIIETE 4-•612 UNLESS NOTED OT EI MM
`
4
!
I
1
a P ARKING SE�WWOICAAPPED STALLS 8
SK41B�
t
OTMEFL
8 WIDE BY 18'-W DEEP WITH W -O' WIDE BY 18'-Or DEEP STRIPED
I
ACCESS AREA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. (REFER TO GEN(NAL DETAILS
3(rR
Rem
2w
0612 CONCR ETE
E REQUIRED ACCESS .PERMITS TO BE OBTAINED FROM Mn /DOT. FINAL APPROACH
f
CURB Ate CUTTER
AND DECELERATION LANE (IF ANY) WALL BE APPROVED BY Mn /DOT.
i
A PROVIDE D ARE BASED UPON PREVIOUS
LEX DEVELOPMENTS WHICH REQUIRE SIMILAR, APPROX. 120 STALLS PER
112. 24
PARKING
TOTAL
11,000 S.F. OF BUILDING.
i
120 SPACES /
11. A PORTION OF THE AVAILABLE STALLS (OVER 55) WILL BE UTILIZED FOR
AUTOMOBILE'S.
•
rn
DISPLAY OF NEW AND PREVIOUSLY OWNED
12. ALL TRASH WILL BE STORED INSIDE THE BUILDING.
PROPOSED LEXUS
13. REFER TO DETAIL SHEET 4 FOR EROSION CONTROL DETAILS.
1 1.000 S.F.
v
14. REFER TO EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEET 3 FOR GROUND COVER
MIXTURE IN BUFFER YARD SETBACK.
15. A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL AND VARWMNCE REQUEST HAVE BEEN
MADE TO THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ON DEC. 07. 1 895.
t
LIGHT
o STANDARD TYP.
z 000e
f
PlAM SKIN -
1 •
D
fES -
SITE PLAN
,o
A
N
Mw
1
!
t
i
r
i
i
t
LIGHT
o STANDARD TYP.
z 000e
f
PlAM SKIN -
1 •
D
fES -
SITE PLAN
,o
A
N
Mw
Attachment 4.
�ur�n�rr�
Demmber 5 1995
NARRAIM STATEMENT FOR VARULNCE APPLICATION
Lczus Development = Highway 61
Tract D and G RLS No. 525
The above stated properties are qtly under the ownership of Howard and Raymond Lacktorin.
The properties have been M tb�e Laclotorin £amity for decades and a third brother, Clarence, owns a
third parcel directly north of Tract D. The site location and request for development of Tracts D
and G will require a varianc to Section 9 -196 wetland and streams, site plan approval, and a
P ublic impro project. The following narrative focuses on the ice request
whereas a site plan approval application is being submitted concurrently and a public for
the waterma n project is ss eduled for J 8
The subject Property been existing is its current state for decades, currently the sites contain 'a
billboard aid sheds for sale. The zoning classification M -1 Light Manufacturing allows the
proposed automotive land use without restriction. All setbacks for the building and parking lot will
be in excess of the M -1 zoning district standards.
The change to the subject property has occurred due to the wetland classification provided by the
Ramsey Washington Metro Wald District. The subject wetland edge essentially parallels the
eastern PmI-eriy line of Tracts D aad G. The delineation aad analysis was provided by the
Watershed staff. The vNetlaad is classified as a Group 1 Wetland. The City of Maplewood Zoning
Cade Section 9 -1 96, Wetlands and Streams, Item (h) Buffer Standards. indicates the average and
minimwn width of a Group 1 wetland buffer shall be 100 feet. Strict adherence of a 100' wide
buffer yard will render Tract D and G of RLS 525 not developable to a reasonable use. The buffer
yard was imposed onto the subject parcels when the City adopted the new standards of Section 9-
1% in April of 1995. The wetland in question is completely east of the property line and is under
the ownership of the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed.
The variance request is being made subject to Article (f) variances of Section 9 -196, which states:
a.) Strict eaforcernent would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
P under consideration.
b.) The variance would be in beeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
The application 5 1995,, has been discussed with City staff and the administrator
of the Watershed District and will improve the existin buffer edge condition.
The 100' buffer yard was not in eicistence prior to April 1995, and if applied would restrict
reasonable use of the property. T1re subject parcels average less than 300' in width and imposition
of a 100 foot buffer will consume 1/3 to 1/2 of the developable area. Due to the setbacks
nocessary on State Highway 61, the property cannot be put to a reasonable use under the existing
�in�g with a 100' buffer yard classiScation.
er 1995 -1- NARRATIVE
pg 11
Unique circumstances to this property are the edge of the newly classified wedaad parallels the
eastern property line. The only change to the subject property has been the wetland classification
sud ordinaacx of a buffer yard setback imposed onto Tracts D and G. Neither of which were
created by the land owner.
In order to maintain the itrtegrity of the wetlaad aid create an improved buffer edge,, the applicant
is proposing a reduced buffer of 25' in width. The 25' buffer will also eliminate the elcisting
erodable edge 000dition with a 3 to 1 slope and a selected ground cover of Mn/DOT approved
native grass species. The erodable slope will be removed and all u +olled flows will be
eliminated. The proposed 25' buffer will enable the parcels to be developed to a reasonable use and -
rove the buffer yard over preset day conditions:
Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc., roquests the City Planning Commission sad City
Council approve a variance for a 25' buffer yard along the eastern edge of Tract D and G of RLS
525. The applicant .proposes to develop the site according to the plans submitted on December S,
1995, provided a public wateimain services the I roperty.
Thank you for your consideration of this variance request.
P9 12
December 1995 - 2 - NARRATIVE
Attachment 5
CIVIL ENGINEERING • URBAN PLANNING • TRANSPORTATION • ENVIRONMENTAL
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT • LAND SURVEY
Mr. Tom Ekstrand
City of Maplewood
Associate Planner
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 53709
Re: Site plan submittal
Conditional Use Permit
Lexus Dealership State Highway 61
Dear Tom:
On behalf of Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc., the applicant is requesting a Conditional
Use Permit for construction of a ite nance garage in association with the site plan approval,
variance, and watershed permit approval. As stated in the City Code Sections 36-151 (b) (9) on page
2241, the itenance garage portion of the site plan application requires a conditional use permit.
The primary function of the Lexus Dealership shall be the selling and display of new Lexus vehicles; a
!ttenance work area is an accessory component of the car dealership.
The following responses to the criteria for IIc ^p �* �rA nRA , ^r the Qi+p rI
p �,
package submitted to the City of Maplewood on December 6, 1995 and on the grading permit plan set
submitted to the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District on December 8, 1995.
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
The existing zoning is M -1 manufacturing which allows as an outright use car dealerships
and display lots. The majority of car dealerships on Highway 61 have as a service to their
customers a maintenance facility specifically integrated into the car dealership operation.
The property to the south, Venberg Tire, currently has operational maintenance garages as
does the Toyota Dealership located across Highway 61. The proposed maintenance garage
will occupy approximately 3,500 sq. ft. of the proposed 11,000 sq. ft. facility. All
maintenance on the vehicles will occur within the structure as required by Code. The
exterior of the maintenance area will be constructed of the same rock - faced concrete
masonry units as the showroom and customer service area.
13
(612) 933 -0972 • 6110 Blue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 • FAX (612) 933 -1153
Tom Ekstmnd
Page 2
December 28, 1995
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
The proposed use would improve the existing land use from a lot selling wooden sheds to a
permanent structure compatible with all applicable Design Review Committee criteria and
building codes. Removal of the blighted visual condition of the lot would occur if the site
plan, public watermain and variance are approved. The planned character of the area is
1VI -1 and the proposed structure exceeds the design requirements of a manufacturing
facility.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
The property values will increase due to the water availability to the property and
investment in the building and site. Secondly, the improvement to the slope adjacent to the
wetland will eliminate the erodable slope conditions and undesirable ground cover. The
proposed grading plan will improve the water quality, revegetate the slope with native and
appropriate grass species, conducive to an improved wetland and wildlife habitat.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water
or air pollution, drainage water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
The proposed will not involve any of the above activities due to its location in an M -1
district and lack of residential properties nearby. The exterior lights are a down cast cut
off fixture at a 24' height and will illuminate the parking lot and display areas.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
The proposed site plan will only have access from the northbound lanes of State Highway
61. Southbound traffic on State Highway 61 will not have access to the site. The entrance
to the site will be coordinated with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and will
require a driveway access permit. The location of the Lexus dealership was selected based
upon the traffic already on' Highway 61 and the surrounding land uses. Trus car dealersnip
Will not adversely affect the existing traffic on Highway 61 or any local street.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
The project will require a public watermain source, which has already been petitioned by
the applicant. A public hearing has been scheduled for January 8, 1996. Without a public
watermain source, this project will not proceed. The MWCC has been contacted and will
allow connection to the sanitary sewer. Storm e from the site has been discussed
with the City and watershed. A grading permit and plan set has been submitted to the
watershed for approval. -
14
Tom Ekstrand
page 3
December 28, 1995
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
The public facilities of Maplewood will be expanded and the general public better served
in terms of fire safety by the installation of a watermain from Bean Avenue to County
Road D. Additionally, the value of the properties which would .have fire and domestic
water will increase the anticipated tax base in Maplewood.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
The proposed use has been designed to enhance the wetland edge and provide a buffer yard
area between the development and the wetland. The erodable slopes will be eliminated and
a buffer yard at a 3:1 slope will be created along the entire wetland boundary. The buffer
yard width of 25 feet will allow the site to be developed, and the wetland edge and buffer
yard improved at no cost to the watershed district. The applicant has met with City staff
and watershed staff prior to submittal of the site plan. The proposed plan presents a win-
win situation for the applicant, City and watershed.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
As stated, all stormwater will be controlled and channeled through outlet structures with
appropriate rip rap and erosional/sedimentation controls in place. Secondly, the
maintenance garage operations will be located within the proposed structure. All
maintenance operations regarding recycling waste products /oils of the vehicles will be
performed to state building codes and MPCA regulations.
Thank you for your timely response to the site plan, variance and conditional use pemut on the
proposed Lelcus dealership on Highway 61. If you have any additional questions in regard to this
application, please do not hesitate to contact Gary Prinsen at 336 -1214 or myself at 933 -0972.
Sincerely,
RLK Associates, Ltd.
John Dietrich, ASLA
cc: Gary Prinsen
Greg Madsen
Melinda. Coleman
enclosure: Conditional Use Application Form
15
Attachment 6
Ra se y- Washington Metro
o o.
District
o m
0
MEMO
January 26, 1996
1402 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
ECEIV
TO: Ken Roberts, Maplewood Community Development
FROM: Cliff Aichinger, Administrator
SUBJECT: Wetland Buffer Recommendation for Lexus Dealership Site.
(642) 777 -3665
fax (612) 777 -6307
At your request I am forwarding this memo outlining the reasons for our recommendation
and the process followed in our wetland classification process.
The determination of the wetland classification is the key to the buffer size requirement
under the Maplewood Wetland Buffer Ordinance. However, determination of the
wetland classification is a complex, and somewhat subjective process. It uses best
available wetland science and biological. information, but includes several required
subjective steps and determinations. In the administration of any wetland management or
buffer ordinance, it is always good to recognize the limitations of the planning process
and know where some flexibility is appropriate. I will try to acquaint you and the
Planning Commission to these limitations.
Classification Process
The wetland classification process used by the District is predicated on protecting the
existing vegetative community of the wetland. To do this, the process begins with
determining the sensitivity of the wetland vegetation community to impacts from
stormwater runoff.
Attachment 1 illustrates the decision tree process we followed in making the wetland
classifications and the information needs of the process. The Maplewood classifications
are 1 through 5. Your class 1 wetland is equivalent to our "protect" classification. The
Maplewood ordinance added a classification for unique wildlife habitat. This
classification is not specifically identified in our process, but was derived from our
function and value assessment of each wetland.
As a bit of background, the District completed an inventory of all wetlands in our
District. We also included those small portions of Maplewood that are outside of the
District boundaries. Each of these wetlands were field inspected and a function and value
assessment was completed for each wetland basin This assessment identified a 0 -4 value
for each wetland function; floral diversity, wildlife habitat, fishery habitat,
flood/stormwater attenuation, water quality protection, and
aesthetics /recreation/education. This assessment provided much of the information
needed to complete the decision tree process.
The wetland inspection also provided the information needed for determining the wetland
sensitivity to stormwater impacts. Each wetland basin was classified according to its
16
Ken Roberts MEMO
January 26, 1996
Page 2
wetland vegetation into one of the four sensitivity classes; highly sensitive, moderately
sensitive, slightly sensitive, or least sensitive. One of the limitations of the process hies in
this step. For highly diverse wetland basins we must still make one wetland vegetative
type classification. Even though the basin is classified as highly sensitive, a portion of
the basin may be least sensitive. In most cases we would rather err on the side of
protection, but in cases where the adjacent land is particularly unique or valuable it may
warrant another look to make sure the classification and final buffer classification is
appropriate.
The second step is to develop a general determination of the wetland condition. Again
this is a somewhat subjective judgment on the part of the wetland inspector. The
implication is significant since any basin identified as "excellent" is automatically
elevated to the next level in the decision tree. Attachment 2 gives some of the factors
used in making the condition rating.
The third step is to determine the significance rating. Attachment 2 also gives the factors
used in making this rating. Again this can be somewhat subjective and a significant
rating automatically elevates the wetland basin to the next level.
Although this process includes some subjective aspects, the subjective decisions are made
by individuals with scientific background and experience. In most cases I believe the
classification would pass a rigorous challenge. However, it is also a process where
.another expert could easily argue that the wrong decisions were made.
The main point I want to make is that this, as with any other process I've seen, is not a
black and white issue. There can be disagreement based on best professional judgment.
Lexus Dealership Site
This is a classic case for identifying the shortfalls of the process I discussed above. It
probably illustrates every limitation in this process and why there has to be a variance
process available.
First, the wetland lying to the east of the dealership site is a matrix of wetland types and
conditions (see attachment 3). This area was farmed until approximately 1970. County
Ditch 18, north branch, divides the site north and south. Two other smaller drainage
ditches were cut from County Ditch 18 to the east to provide agricultural drainage. Since
agricultural activity has stopped, the area has reverted to a mosaic of wetland types.
In one respect the area is no where near "natural ", since it has been altered significantly
over the years. On the other hand it has reverted into a wetland complex that contains
some very good quality habitat. The west side of the wetland has been filled. This is
where the Lexus dealership is proposed.
Consideration of the west side of this site illustrates the shortcomings of the classification
process. We had to average the wetland to identify its general susceptibility rating,
condition and significance. This process resulted in a "protect" management
classification (level 1 in the Maplewood Ordinance). However, when you examine the
west side of this basin, it is clear that the wetland is partially filled and receiving
significant sediment loads from the eroding fill slope. Also the wetland immediately
adjacent to this fill area is primarily reed canary grass. The major influence of the
County Ditch on this side of the wetland is also a significant influence. If this wetland
17
Ken Roberts MEMO
January 26, 1996
Page 3
basin were classified using only the features of the west side, the ranking process would
work like this --
1. Reed Canary grass vegetation community slightly sensitive
2. Wetland condition - highly altered
3. Resource significance - nonsignificant
4. Management strategy - Utilize (Maplewood buffer classification 5)
District Recommendation
Due to the known condition of this wetland and the problems with the eroding fill on the
west side, I came to several conclusions, when reviewing the proposal.
1. The intent of the buffer ordinance is to preserve the existing "natural" buffers
around wetlands to protect water quality, wildlife habitat, and ecological
diversity. There is No buffer on the west side of the wetland in its current
condition. Preserving .what is there would be a detriment to the wetland not
help it.
2. The condition on the west side of the wetland will continue to deteriorate unless
it is stabilized and maintained.
3. The slope will not be addressed unless the site develops with a more permanent
type use.
4. A 100 foot buffer requirement would almost eliminate the potential of any
viable use of the property and would likely result in a challenge to the buffer
ordinance.
5. Establishment of a vegetative buffer, even a small buffer would eliminate
existing erosion problems and provide improved habitat.
6. Agreeing to a smaller buffer (25 feet) with .the requirement that the developer
establish a buffer to our specifications helps the west side of the basin and in no
way diminishes the value of the remainder of the wetland basin.
7. A 25 foot buffer is consistent with the wetland classification if the adjacent
wetland were rated without consideration other parts of the wetland complex.
m
Figure
Wetland/Storm Water Management
Decision Tree
Wetland S ensitivi ty Wetland Condition Resource Significance Management Strategy
Excellent
Significant
Highly Sensitive Moderate _�. Protect
Highly Impacted Nonsignificant
Excellent
Significant
Moderately Sensitive Moderate Manage -1
� Nonsignificant
Highly Impacted
Excellent
Significant
Slightly Sensitive Moderate Manage -2
Nonsignificant
Highly Impacted
Least Sensitive Highly Impacted Nonsignificant - -► Utilize
C�
�r�
AV - A-ctl titcruz z_
Wetland Management Plan
Notes for Determining Condition and Significance Ratings
FACTORS INFLUENCING WETLAND CONDITION RATING:
Rating Categories: Excellent
Moderate
Highly Impacted
Rating factors:
1. FunctionNalue code. A high FN code in any one category would give it a
moderate rating. A high FN code in two or more categories would give the
wetland a excellent rating. Any FN code with two or more "0" ratings would
be an automatic highly impacted rating.
2. Any excavated or created basin is an automatic highly impacted rating.
3. Any wetland adjacent to a major roadway and receiving stormwater discharge
is an automatic highly impacted rating.
4. Any wetland with visible signs of sedimentation or impacts from stormwater
discharge is an automatic highly impacted rating.
5. Wetlands that are immediately adjacent to residential or commercial
development and receiving direct stormwater discharge and/or are turfed to the
edge of the wetland are an automatic highly impacted rating.
6. Wetlands that are somewhat removed from existing development and have no
obvious signs of alteration or stormwater impacts have a moderate rating.
FACTORS INFLUENCING RESOURCE SIGNIFICANCE RATING:
Rating Categories: Significant
Non- significant
Rating Factors:
1. All wetlands not receiving a significant rating are non - significant.
2. Significant wetlands are the following:.
- Wetlands adjacent to or in a school site.
- Wetlands adjacent to or in a city, county or regional park.
- Wetlands adjacent to or in a nature center.
- Wetlands with unique, threatened or endangered flora or fauna.
- Wetlands that are rare for our watershed district.
- Wetlands that are of high value to the District for water quality management
or flood control.
20
e xu� dealership Wetland
Wetland Classification
PEMA
PEMB
PEMC
PEMF
�
P FO 1 A
PFO 1 C
PSS1 A
�
P C
PUBF
�
j
Mapparcel.shp
3
h�
Z
w
Attachment 7
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc, applied for a variance from the
zoning ordinance.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to property on the east side of Highway 61 between Beam
Avenue and County Road D. The legal description is:
Tracts D and G, Registered Land Survey No. 525
WHEREAS, Section 36- 196(h)(3) of the wetland protection ordinance requires a 100 -foot-
wide wetland buffer.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 25 -foot -wide wetland buffer.
WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 75 feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On February 5, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council
this variance.
2. The city council held a public hearing on February 12, 1996. City staff published a notice
in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as
required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and
present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations
from the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
variance for the following reasons:
1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the property and not created by the property owner. The 100 -foot -wide wetland
buffer requirement would make development of this site difficult. The difficulty was
created by the new ordinance.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, since the
applicant would improve the quality of the wetland buffer substantially over its present
state.
Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following:
1. Submitting a grading and landscaping plan subject to the requirements of the city staff
and the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for the wetland buffer.
2. Dedicating a wetland -buffer easement. This easement shall describe the boundary of the
buffer and prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. The
applicant shall record the deed for this easement before the city will issue a building
permit.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1996.
22
Attachment 8
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc. applied for a conditional use permit
for a motor vehicle maintenance garage as part of a new Lexus automobile dealership;
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property on the east side of Highway 61 between Beam
Avenue and County Road D. The legal description is:
Tracts D and G, Registered Land Survey No. 525
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On February 5, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council
this permit.
2. On February 12, 1996, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone
at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approves this permit
because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to
any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water
or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference
or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems,. schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8.. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
23
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. . The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval
or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. Before the issuance of a building permit, the city must have a signed construction contract for
the extension of the water main to the Lexus site. The water system must be operational
before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
5. The future expansion is not allowed with this permit. The applicant must apply for design
approval and an amendment to the conditional use permit before building this expansion.
The future expansion must be at least 100 feet from the billboard.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on
. 1996.
24
MINUTES of THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 16,1996
IV: NEW BUSINESS
A. t exus Dealership—Highway 61 North: Wetland Buffer variance and Conditional Use Permit
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report and answered questions from the
commission. Commissioner Thompson was concerned about the dumping of snow on the back
of the lot in the .buffer area. Ken Haider, city engineer, said the city does use areas adjacent to
wetlands and P onds for snow disposal because no other place is available. He said the intent of
the dumping restriction in this easement was meant to be debris, tires, etc. Commissioner Frost
asked about a provision for maintenance of the catch basins and protection of the quality of the
, drainage. Mr. Haider said curbs would be required to direct the runoff.
John Dietrich of RLK Associates, representative for the Lexus dealership and Ryan Construction,
was present. Mr. Dietrich said they read the staff report and concurred with the
recommendations. He said all uncontrolled runoff will be channeled through catch basins down to
the low Level of the wetland with proper erosion and sediment control systems in place.
Mr. Dietrich also pointed out the location of the three proposed catch basins. Mr. Haider asked
the commission to keep in mind that, although this is a wetland, it also is the conveyor of the
storm water from a large portion of White Bear Lake and Highway 61.
Commissioner Rossbach said he was disturbed by the proposal. Mr. Rossbach said he was told
that wetland buffers less than 75 feet are almost worthless and, therefore, the 25 -foot buffer
would afford no protection for the Class 1 wetland. He said that when the owners filled the
property, the displaced dirt caused problems for the adjoining property because the soil they
propose to build on is muck. Mr. Rossbach also felt that the runoff from the dealership would be
unprotected and would be dumped in the wetland. He said the developer was planning to bypass
the buffer with catch basins. Mr. Rossbach also indicated that other wetlands to the north are
filtering some of the runoff from White Bear Lake and Highway 61. He favored a bigger buffer
area and controls to cleanse the drainage before it goes into the wetland.
Commissioner Fischer asked if skimmers the city required on another dealership site in
Maplewood were effective. Mr. Haider said, to the best of his knowledge, there has been no
testing or evaluation on the previous application. Commissioner Kittridge said he thought the city
had made a commitment to better protect the environment for the future and he wasn't sure if this
proposal would be a step in that direction.
Ms. Coleman director of community development, said the watershed, in a meeting with the city
and applicant, supported this proposal and felt if would improve the buffer area and enhance the
quality of the slope. She said the classification of the wetland as a Class 1 was questionable
because it is filled with urban runoff. Ms. Coleman said future development of this site with a 100 -
foot setback requirement is unlikely because it would take about forty percent or more of the site.
Mr. Dietrich said the watershed identified the Kohlman/NSP wetland basin in a functional
classification for stormAvater ponding. This high level of classification caused it to be put in the
city's class of Group 1 wetland. He said they-were willing to work with the watershed and perhaps
put one outlet with a skimmer at the base of the slope.
Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend tabling this proposal until the
February 5, 1996, Planning Commission meeting. It is requested that a representative of the
watershed district be present at this meeting.
Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 9,1996
*1 B. Lexus Dealership, Highway 61 South of 1-694
John Dietrich of RLK Associates, representing Ryan Construction Company and the Lexus
Dealership, was present. Mr. Dietrich.said he had no questions or concerns in regard to the
staff recornmendations. Greg Madsen, senior project architect for Ryan Companies, was also
resent. Mr. Madsen asked for clarification of the requirement to post signs designating 55
parking spaces. Secretary Ekstrand said they were looking for signage that indicated specific
areas for customer and employee parking. Mr. Madsen then answered questions from the
board.
Mr. Madsen described the current buffer as a steep erodible slope of poplar and box elder.
He said that, working with the watershed district, they have been able to plan a 25 -foot buffer
zone with a consistent slope, graded 3:1, and planted with native grasses and indigenous
seedings to control the runoff. Chairperson Erickson asked about the possibility of a setback
variance at the Highway 61 entrance. Secretary Ekstrand said that, because the watershed
district was not opposed to this proposal, this option was not discussed. He also said that a
20 -foot setback from Highway 61 is proposed, but only 15 feet is required. Mr. Erickson was
concerned that the addition of the blacktop would increase the runoff. Mr. Dietrich pointed out
this is an M -1 zoning and allows for a fairly high -level of impervious. He said that large
utilities would be running along the western edge that would require an easement.
Mr. Madsen showed a rendering of the proposed structure and also a photo of an existing
Lexus building that is similar to this one. Mr. Madsen described the materials being used as
grayish with an abundance of glazing. He said the roof drainage would be internal and a 4-
foot P arapet would screen some mechanical units. The main mechanical unit would be on
ground level. There would be internal storage of recyclables, such as oil, tires, batteries, etc.
The board discussed placement of the accelerationldeceleration lanes-along Highway 61.
They decided to require that Mn/DOT review the traffic flow to and from the property.
Boardmember Vidyashankar moved the Community Design Review Board recommend:
C. Approval of the plans (stamped December 7, 1995) for proposed Lexus dealership on
Highway 61 based on the findings required by the code. Approval is subject to the
.following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit
for this project.
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall:
a. Dedicate and record a wetland - buffer easement. This easement shall describe
the boundary of the buffer and prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or
dumping within the buffer.
Community Design Review Board -4-
Minutes of 01 -09 -96
b. Submit a revised landscape plan providing for any planting and ground reshaping
or restoration of the wetland buffer as may be required by the Ramsey-
Washington Metro Watershed District. Replace the seed on the Highway 61
right -of -way with sod if allowed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
The right -of -way shall have an in- ground lawn irrigation system unless prohibited
by MnDOT,
3. Before the issuance of a building permit, the city must have a signed construction
contract for the extension of the water main. to the Lexus site. The water system must
be operational before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
4. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Replace any property irons removed because of this construction.
b. Install reflectorized stop signs at both exits, a handicap parking sign for each
handicap parking space and an address on the building.
c. Screen all roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property..
(code requirement)
d. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure, subject to staff approval, if there would be
outside trash storage. (code. requirement)
e. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for the parking lot islands and the
sodded areas between the highway and the parking lot. Lawn irrigation in the
right -of -way may be waived if MnDOT will not allow it.
f. Post signs designating at least 55 customer and employee parking spaces.
g. Post one -way traffic signs for the narrow driveway beneath the canopy on the
south side of the building.
5. The future expansion is not allowed. The applicant must apply for design approval
and an amendment to the conditional use permit prior to building this expansion. The
future expansion must be at least 100 feet from the billboard.
6. if any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
7. This approval does not include the signs. Signage will be reviewed by staff through
the sign permit process.
8. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
9. Traffic flow in and out of the Lexus dealership shall be reviewed by MnDOT. Any site
plan change is subject to staff approval.
Boardmember Berggren seconded. Ayes —all
G... a
Act by C aunOi l
MEMORANDUM Endorsees ---- -�
Modified
TO: City Manager Rea ected:.� ---
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Date
SUBJECT: Adult Entertainment/Sexually- Oriented Businesses . Ordinance
DATE: January 3, 4996
INTRODUCTION
On November 7, 1 994, the city council directed the staff to research possible ways to regulate
- sexually- oriented businesses. The council mentioned the use of conditional use permits, zoning,
moratoriums and setback requirements from various uses as possible ways to regulate these
businesses. Past court actions have said that local governments may only reasonably regulate
and. not completely prohibit adult entertainment and sexually - oriented businesses.
On February 27, 1995, the city council adopted a one -year moratorium on adult entertainment
and sexually - oriented businesses. The moratorium has allowed staff time to study where and
how the city code should allow for such businesses in the city. Any new regulations the city
adopts should protect the health, safety and welfare of all residents and existing businesses in
Maplewood. In addition, the moratorium prevented new adult entertainment and sexually- oriented
businesses from opening or existing ones from expanding until the city passes a new ordinance
about these establishments.
DISCUSSION
Staff modeled the proposed ordinance after ordinances that Woodbury and Bloomington recently
adopted. It has several parts including findings and purposes., definitions, license regulations
and standards and sign restrictions. As proposed, adult uses would be a permitted use in the
M -1 (light manufacturing) and M -2 (heavy manufacturing) zoning districts subject to several
performance standards. These include getting a license approved by the city council and being at
least 350 feet away from protected land uses (residential, day -care centers, libraries, churches,
parks, etc.) and they be at least 1,000 feet apart from each other.
Table 2 (page 2) shows where and how much land would be available for adult uses in the M -1
zoning district if they are 350 and 500 feet from protected land uses. The bottom of the table
gives the percent of Maplewood that would be available in the M -1 and in the M -1 and M -2
zoning districts together. As proposed, 4.96 percent of the city would be available for adult uses.
Table 3 (page 3) is similar to Table 2, but also includes the BC (business commercial) zoning
district as an area for adult uses. The city attorney felt that the city should not allow adult uses in
the BC zone and thus recommended that staff not include the BC zone in the draft ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the ordinance starting on page 4. This ordinance establishes regulations about adult uses
and sexually- oriented businesses in Maplewood.
kr /p:ord/adult3. mem
Attachments:
1. Table 2
2. Table 3
3. Ordinance
Attachment I
Table 2 November 20, 1995
P rc nt f L nd in laplewoad_Available for �4��du�lt Entertainment l�sage
Available Area in Zoning Districts M1 by Square foot and Acre
Section #
350 feet from Protected Areas
500 feet from Protected Areas
Square Feet
Acres
Square Feet
Acres
NY2 Sec 3
4, 510, 600
103.55
3
76.76
SY2 Sec 3
1
28.75
952,760
21.87
NY2 Sec 4
276,700
6.35
72,785
1.67
SY2 Sec 4
248,800
5.71
57,700
1.32
N Y2 Sec 9
1
35.80
1
23.73
SI /z Sec 9
1
26.45
850,000
19.51
NY2 Sec 10
228
5.23
88,500
2.03
SY2 Sec 10
1,625, 000
37.30
734,800
16.87
S% Sec 11
356,600
8.19
196, 580
4.51
NY2 Sec 15
40,600
0.93
0.0
0.0
SY Sec 18
132,000
3.03
0.0
0.0
NY2 Se 24
125,000
2.87
15,400
0.35
SY2 Sec 24
109,000
2.50
000
0.0
NY2 Sec 36
4
102.3
4
92.29
6 524 .368.97
is
.:.
1,366,125
260.91
3.02% of Maplewood available -- 350 feet from protected areas
2.13% of Maplewood available -- 500 feet from protected areas
(Total Area of Maplewood: 532,477,440 square feet -- 12,224 acres)
If M2 zoned areas are included in the totals, the amount of land available increases to:
350 Feet: 26,409,520 Sqft, 606.28 Acres, 4.96 % of Maplewood
500 Feet: 21,066,125 Sqft, 483.61 Acres, 3.96 % of Maplewood
2
P:\miscell\M 1 adult. use
Table 3.
Attachment 2
November 20, 1995
Percent Hof Viand n flaplewvo d ► ► ailab a for 4du1t inter# Jnment: sage
Available Area in Zoning Districts M1, M2, BC and SC by Square Foot and Acre
Section
350 feet from Protected Areas
500 feet from Protected Are as
Square Feet
Acres
Square Feet
Acres
N 1 / Sec 2
5,350
122.80
4, 051,612
93.01
NY2 Sec 3
6,717, 000
154.20
4, 910, 000
112.72
SY2 Sec 3
1,437, 000
32.99
1,114, 000
25.57
NY2 Sec 4
411,607
9.45
74,076
1.70
SY2 Sec 4
250,200
5.74
56,018
1.29
NY2 Sec 9
1
26.26
898,680
20.63
SY2 Sec 9
1,152, 034
26.45
850,000
19.51
10
228,000
5.23
88,500
2.03
Sec 10
ENY2 Sec
'1,625, 000
37.30
734
16.87
Sec 11
625, 300
14.35
185,600
4.26
S%2 Sec 11
762
17.50
386
8.87
SY2 Sec 14
251,500
5.77
187,300
4.30
N%2 Sec 15
40,600
0.93
0.0
0.0
NY2 Sec 18
1,753,800
40.26
1
29096
SY2 Sec 18
2
59.45
1
115,400
43.06
NY2 Sec 24
125,000
2.87
0.35
SY2 Sec 24
109,000
2.50
0.0
0.0
NY2 Sec 36
4
102.75
4,020
92.29
S%2 Sec 36
10,334,000
237.24
9,700,000
222.68
NY2 Sec 1 (28)
185,000
4.25
61,000
1.40
TOTALS:
39
908.29
30,614
700.5
7.43 % of Maplewood available -- 350 feet from protected areas
5.73 % of Maplewood available -- 500 feet from protected areas
Total Area of Maplewood: 532,477,440 square feet (12,224 acres)
3
Attachment 3
ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE
CITY CODE BY ADDING LANGUAGE ABOUT ADULT USES AND SEXUALLY-
ORIENTED BUSINESSES
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
SECTION 1. This section adds the following to the Maplewood City Code: (I have underlined the
additions.)
CHAPTER 17.4
ADULT USES AND SEXUALLY - ORIENTED BUSINESSES
Sec. 17.4. Adult Uses and Sexually- oriented Businesses.
a. Pi_ nd nes and.,Pumos_
1. The u [2ose of this ordinance is to control through licensing and zoning re ulations
certain land uses that have a direct and detrimental effect on the character of the ci s
residential and commercial neigh borhoods.
2. The Ma lewood Cily Council .makes the following findings about the effect adult uses
and sexual) oriented businesses have on the character of the cit s neighborhoods. In
making the findin s the cily council accepts the recommendations of staff that has
studied the ex eriences of other urban areas about such businesses. The Minnesota
Attorney General, the American Planning Association, and the cities of Saint Paul,
Indiana olis Rochester Minnesota Phoenix Arizona Los Angeles,, Seattle and New
York have studied the im acts of adult uses and sexually-oriented businesses on urban
areas. These studies have concluded that adult uses and sexual] oriented businesses
have adverse im acts on the surrounding neighborhoods. Based on these studies and
findings, the Maplewood CityCouncl concludes:
lad Adult uses and sexuall - oriented businesses can contribute to an increase in
crime in the. area where such businesses are located. This can be a burden to ci
crime - prevention pLoarams and law- enforcernent sees.
JbI Adult uses and sexually- oriented businesses can. significantly contribute to the
deterioration of residential nei hborhoods and can increase neighborhood blight
These businesses also can impair the character and quality of t_ he residential
housino in the area where such businesses are. This situation could lessen the
amount of desirable housing for reside_ nts.
Lcl The concentration of adult uses and sexually- oriented businesses , in one area can
greatly affect the area where such businesses are concentrated and on the Quality
of urban life. A cycle, of decay can result from the influx and concentration of adult
uses and sexually-oriented businesses. Others may perceive the presence of
such businesses as an indication that the area is deteriorating and the result can
4
be devastating. That is, other businesses move out of the vicinity and residents
flee from' the area. Lower propertyvalues. that can result from the concentration
of such businesses erode the ci s tax base and contribute to urban bli ht.
Ldl Adult uses and sexually-oriented businesses have adverse seconds im acts of
the types discussed above.
Ue It is necessary to rovide for the s ecial and ex ress regulation of businesses.
establishments or commercial ente rises that operate as adult -bodv p ainti n
studios adult bookstores adult. cabarets adult car washes adult comi2 anionshi p
establis adult hotels or motels adult massa a arlors or health clubs
adu! mini - motion picture theaters adult modelina studios It motion 2icture
arcades or theaters adultriovelly, businesses adult saunas and similar adult-
oriented services 0 ratin under different names to ro tect the ubl ic health
safely and welfare and to uard a g ainst the inception and transmission of
disease.
of The commercial entemrises such as the types described in (e) above and all other
similar establishments whose services include sessions offered to adults
conducted in arivate by members of the same or opp osite sex, and emplovinA
personnel with no saecialized training are susceptible to ogerations contravening,
subvertins� or endangering the morals of the city by being the site of acts of
pro stitution illicit sex and occasions of violent crimes, and thus reauirin4 close
inspection, licensing and reaulation.
LM Control and re ulation of commercial establishments of these. lyp in. view of the
abuses often a etrated . re cure intensive efforts,bv the police department and
other departments. of the ci It is necessa for the cit to rovde services to all
of Ma lewoo without concentrating the ublic services in one area. The
concentrated use of cily services detracts from and reduces the; level of service
available to the rest of Maplewood. Thus these ty es of establishments can
diminish the abilily of the cily to Drotect and R romote the general health welfare
morals and safety of Maplewood.
Uh The cily council adopts the followin land -use and licensin re ulations
, recognizing that it has an interest in the present and future character of the ci s
residential and commercial nei hborhoods. These regulations are to lessen the
detrimental and adverse effects adult uses and sexuall -oriented businesses have
on adjacent land uses and to rotect and oromotethe health safe .and welfare
of the residents of Maplewood.
It is not the intent of the ci council to vro adult uses or sexual! - oriented
businesses or establishments from having an o ortunit to locate in Mal2lewood. It
also is not the intent of the city council to regulate these businesses on the basis of
content but only on the basis of likely adverse seconda effects.
rrrr_�r
b Definitions. The following words shall have the following meanings:
Adult uses: adult body painting studios, adult bookstores, adult cabaret, adult car wash, adult
.hotels or motels duIt motion picture theaters, adult mini - motion picture theaters, adult massage
parlors, adult health /sports clubs, adult saunas /steam rooms /bath houses, adult companionship
establishments, adult rap /conversation parlors, adult novelty businesses, adult motion picture
arcades adult modeling studios and other remises ente rises establishments businesses or
ply open to some or all members of the public at or in which there is an emphasis on I the
presentation, display,_ depiction, or description o f "specified sexual activities or speci ie
anatomical areas" which the public could see This definition does not apply to the practice of
medicine sur osteoRatby. chiropractic h sical therapy or odiat by state- licensed or
reg istered , i2ersons as outlined in Cha ter 24 of the citv code. Activities classified as obscene as
defined 'by, Minnesota Statutes -4617.241 are not lawful and are not included in the definition of
adult uses.
Adult Use - Accessory: The offering of goods and/or, services classified as adult uses. on a
limited. scale that are incidental to the rims activit and oods and /or services offered b the
establishment. Examples of sch items include adult magazines, adult movies,_ adult novelties,
and the like.
Adult Uses - Princi al: The offerinci of goods and/or services classified as adult uses as a
D rimarv.or sole activily of a business or establishment and include but are not limited to the
following
Adult Body Painting Studio: An establishment or business that provides the service of
app lying paint or other su bstance whether trans anent or nontrans arent to or on the
' body . of a 2atron when such body is wholly or 2artialiv nude in terms of "s ecified
anatomical areas."
Adult Bookstore: An establishment building or business engaoina in the barter, rentaL or
sale of items or merchandise consisting of Tinted matter, p ictures, slides records
audiota es videotapes, com uter or video disks motion 2icture flm or an other similar
materials if such a.shop is not o en to the 12ublic generallv but only to one or more
Classes of the public,. excluding anv minor because of age, if more than twen ly ( 20
ercent of the usable floor area of the establishment buildin or business or if at least
500 s uare feet whichever is smaller, has voducts or materials distin uished or
characterized by an em hasis on matters de ictin escdbin or related to "s ecified
sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas."
Adult Cabaret: An establishment buildina or business that Rrovides dancing or other live
entertainment. if such. dancing or other live. entertainment is distinguished or characterized
bv an emphasis on the performance, p resentation - , display, depiction, or description of
"specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas.
Adult Car.Wash:.A wash facili for any tvoe of motor vehicle that ,allows em to ees
ag ents, inde endent contractors or personSr to a2pear in a state of Rartial or total nudi
in terms of "specified anatomical areas."
L51 Adult Companionship Establishment: An establishment or business if such establishment
excludes minors because of age, or which 2 rovides the service of eng aging in or listenin
to conversation, talk or discussion between an employee of the establishment and a
customer, if such service is distinguished or characterized b an emphasis on "s ecified
sexual activities" or " specified anatomical areas."
Adult Entertainment Facili _ A_ building or space in which an admission is charged for
entrance, or food or nonalcoholic beverages are sold or intended for consumption. and in
which may be observed live presentation of entertainment distinguished or characterized
by an emphasis on matters depi_ctin� describing, or relating to "specified sexual
activities" or "specified anatomical areas."
(Z) Adult Establishment: An establishment building or business. en a i ng in any of the
following activities or which uses any of the following business procedures or practices:
either:
Ua Any business conducted exclusively for the patronage of adults and about which
minors are specifically e_ xcluded from patronage thereat either b law aw or by the
operators of such business: or
L b I Anv other business that offers its patrons services products or entertainment
characterized by an emphasis on matter dep ct g, exposing, describing, discussing
or relating to `specified, sexual _activities" or "specified anatomical areas._
Saec_if calls included in the term.. but without limitation, are adult bookstores, adult
motion picture theaters.. adult mini - motion picture theaters adult massa a arlors
adult health clubs adult saunas adult com2anionshi2 establishments adult health
clubs .adult cabarets adult car washes adult novelly businesses adult motion 2icture
arcades, adult modeling studios, a__ dult ,hotel or motel, and adult bad v 2aintina studios.
U8 Adult Hotel or Motel: A hotel or mote{ from ,which minors are sQecif cally_excluded , from
P atronage and in which material is Rresented that is distinguished or characterized bv an
emphasis on matter depicting, describing or relating to "specified sexual activities" or
"specified anatomical areas.'s
U Adult Massa a Parlor Health/Sport Club: A massage parlor or health /s ort club that
restrict minors because of age, which 2 rovide the services . of massa a .if such service is
distinguished or .characterized by an emphasis on " specified sexual activities" or
"specified anatomical areas."
_(10) Adult. Mini- Motion Picture Theater: A business building or establishment in an enclosed
building with a capacity for less than 50 Re rsons used for Rresenting visual media
material if such business as a 2revailing Rractice excludes minors by virtue of age, or if
said material is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual
activities" or "specified anatomical areas" for observation by patrons.
( 111 Adult Modeling Studio: An establishment or business whose major business is the
p rovision, to customers of figure models who are so 2rovided with the intent of providin
sexual stimulation or sexual gratification to such customers who engage in "s ecified
sexual activities" or display "specified anatomical areas" while being observed.. painted
p ainted u on sketched drawn scui tured ,, photo ra hed or otherwise de icted by such
customers.
12 A_ dult Motion Picture Arcade: Any building or„elace to which the public is allowed or
invited in which coin or slug- operated or electronically, electrically_ or mechanically_
controlled still or motion 2icture machines ro'ectors computers. or other ima e-
roducin devices that show images to five or fewer 2ersons Rer machine at once and
where the images so displayed are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on
depicting or describing "specified sexual activities" or "spe„ cif ed_ anatomical areas."
---.( Adult Motion Picture Theaters: A business premises within an enclosed building Wth_ a
capacity of 50 or more persons used presen_ tiny y suealedia material if said business
as a prevailing .practice excludes minors by virtue of ace, or if said material is
distinguished or characterized by an emphassis . on the depiction or description of
"s ecified .sexual activities" or "specified., anatomical areas" for observation bv patrons.
(14) Adult Novelty Business: A business that has as a principal activi the sale of materials
or devices that stimulate human genitals or devices designed for sexual stimulation or
which depict or relate t_ o specified sexual activities or speed anatomical areas.
, M 5,1 Adult Sauna/Steam Room /Bathhouse: A sauna/steam room /bathhouse that excludes
minors because of age, or which 2 rovides a steam bath or heat bathin room used for
bathing, pleasure, relaxation or reducing, utilizing steam or hot air as. a cleanina. relaxin
or reducing aa ent if the service 2rovided the sauna/steam room /bathhouse is
distinguished or characterized by an em hasis on. "s ecifed sexual activities" or
"specified anatomical areas.
Licensed family day-care home licensed grou2 Tamil day-care home licensed -child -care
center: A facility holding a license from Rarnse .Coup or Minnesota Rursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Cha ter 245A and /or Minnesota Rules Chapter 9502 or Cha ter 9503 as amended.
Minor. Any natural personunder the age of eighteen M 8 ears.
Nudi : The showing of the human male or female genitals or pubic area with less than a full.
o a ue cove ring: the showing, of the female breast with less than a full o a ue lcovering of an
ortion thereof below a Roint immediately above thelop of the areola• or the depiction or showin
of the covered male genitals in a discernibly turgid state.
Public Library : Any, library that provides free access to all residents - of a city or county without
discrimination and is organized under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 134.
Public Park: A oark, reservation o en s ace la round beach or recreation or communi#
center in the cily owned leased or used wholly or in part. by a cit y, counly, state school district
or federa for recreation purposes.
Place of Worshi : A Wilding ors ace that is nnci all used as a vlace where eo le of the
same faith or religion regularly .assemble for ,worship. .
.School: A building or space that is,princiRally used as a glace where twen -five L25) or more
P ersons receive a full. course of educational instruction. Any ost- seconds or ost -hi h school
educational building, including any college or any vocational- technical college, shall not be
deemed . a school for .purposes of this ordinance.
Sexually - Oriented Business: An adult book store. adult bodv painting studio, adult car wash
adult. cabaret adult hotel or motel adult com anionshi R establishment adult motion Ricture.
theater, adult mini- motion picture theater adult massage arlor adult entertainment facility,, adult .. "NNW="
MONOW health or s orts clubst adult novel! y business adult modeling studio or adult sauna as defined
herein. Activities classified as obscene as defined by Minnesota Statutes §617.241 are not
lawful and are not included in the definition of adult uses.
Ste. ecified Anatomical Areas: Anatomical areas consisting of
Less than completely and opaguely covered human - genitals, pubic region or 2ubic hair
buttock, anus, or female breast or breasts below a point immediately above the #o, p of
the areola or any combination of the foregoina; and
IQ Human male genitals in a disc turgid state even if completely and opaquely_
covered.
SRecified Sexual Activities: Activities consisting of the following:
Actual or simulated sexual intercourse oral copulation, anal intercourse, oral -anal
copulation, bestiality, direct physical stimulation or fondling of unclothed genitals, pubic
re buttock or female breast. , flagellation or torture in - a sexual relationshig or the
use of excretoEy functions in a sexual relationshiR2 and any of the followina sexual) -
odented acts or conduct: anilin us-.tuggery.. co ro ha co ro hilia cunnilin us
fellatio necrophilia, pederasty, edo hilia i uedsm sarmhism. sodomy, zooeras • or
(2) Human 4enitals in the state of sexual, stimulation, arousal or tumescence; or
L31 Use or acts of human or animal ejaculation, sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral
copulation,, coitus, or masturbation,_, or
L41 Fondlin or touching of human enitals ubic region or 2ubic hair, buttocks or female
breast or breasts; or
U Situations involving a 2erson or Rersons,, any of whom are nude clad in
undergarments or in sexually revealing costumes who are engaged in activities
involving the fla torture fettedng,, binding or other ohysical restraint of an
such person; or
L 6 1 Erotic or lewd touching. or other sexual) - oriented contact with an animal by a
human being or
M Human excretion, urination, menstruation, vaginal or anal irrigation; or
' Any combination of the above.
c. Licenses.
1. License Re uired. No 2erson, firm or co oration shall own or o erate an adult use or
sexual) - oriented business in Ma lewood without having first secured a license as
provided herein.. Licenses shall be one of two lees:
Adult Use Principal
Ub Adult Use Access
2. A22lications. The city shall Dre are an ap2lication for. an adult use dnci al or
sexually oriented business license This application shall include:
Ua ' The name, residence, phone_. number and birthdate of the applicant, if an
individual: and if a corporation the names, residences phone numbers and
b of those owners holding „more than five percent (5 %) of the issued and
outstanding stock of the corporation.
LbI The name, address, phone number and birthdate of the operator and manager of
such operation, if different from the own r=;
Lcj The address and legal descrioti_of the building.. establishment or premises
where the adult use or sexually-oon'_entedw business is to be located;
L d l A statement detailing each gross misdemeanor or felon gelatin to a sex offense
and /or the operation of adult uses and related activities of which the applicant Or,
for a corpo_, ration, the owners of more than five percent t5 %) of the outstanding
stoc of the corporation, have been convicted, and whether the applicant has ever
aQpli_d for or held a license to operate a similar type of business in other cities.
Ue The activities and types of business to be conducted;
The hours of operation;
LM The provisions made to,restdct acce by .minors;
LhI A building plan of the premises detailing all intemal opera tions and activities;
Qi A description or building Ian that details all R interior and exterior
chanties to an existing building or structure.
3. License Fees.
lw� 4
Lai Each avRlication for a license shall be accom anied by a receil2t from the ci
finance director for payment in full of the re uired. a lication and investigative fee
for the license as established by the ciN council. All fees shall be paid. into the
general fund of the
All licenses shall ex ire on thelast of. December in each year. The ciN shall
issue each license for one (1) year, except.that if part of the license year has
elapsed when plication is made the ci may issue a license for the
remainder of the year for a p rorated fee. In com2uting such fee the - -city,shall
count any unex ired fraction. of a month as one 1 month.
Uc The annual fee for an adult -use or sexually_ oriented business license, shall be as
established by the city council.
No part of the fee_paid by any license issu d under this ordinance shall be
refunded excel2t in the following instances upon a lication to the cily manager
within thirty ,.(3, 0) days from the happening of the -event. The city shall refund a
rorated p ortion of the fee for the unexpired Redod of the license com uted
monthlv, wh o eration of the licensed business ceases not. less than one 1
month befo ex0rationof the license because o f:
t1} Destruction or damage of the licensed premises by fire or other catastrophe:
The licensee's illness;
L31 The licens death;
(4) A change in the legal status making unlawful for the licensed business to
continue.
Each application shall contain a provision on the application,. in bold print stating
that any withholding, of information or the providing of false or misleading
information will be grounds for t_ he denial or revocation of a license Any cha
in the information provided l u
on the application or provided d, rind the investigation
shall be reported to the city council by the application or licensee_; If said changes
take place dining the investigation, the data shall be .provided to the director of
eublic safety or city manager in writing and they shall report the changes to the
10
cily council. Failure to rep ort said chang by the a licant s or the licensee ma
result in a denial` or revocation 'of a license.
4. Granting of License.
f a
The city shall investiaate all facts set out in the application.. After the ciN finishes
its investigation, the ciN shall hold a public hearing and shall give everyone to be
heard for or against the granting of the license a chance to present their views.
After the irtvestioation and public hearing, the city council shall grant or re #use the
application.
Ub The city shall only issue the license to the applicant. The license shall not be
transferred to another holder. The ci shall only issue each license for the
remises or location described in.the a ligation. No license may be transferred
to another place without the apps vaI of .the C#Councit.
5. Persons Ineli ible for License. The cily shall not arant a license to nor mav one be
he by any person who:
Ua is under twen#�v -one (21) years of ,age.
LbI Has been convicted of a felony or of violating an Minnesota law.
Lcl Is not the 2 of the establishment for which the license is issued.
IM Has not paid the license and investigative fees required by this ordinance.
Lel Is not a citizen of the United States.
j Has had an adult use or similar license or perrn, i, t revoked under an ordinance or
statute similar to this.
5. Places Ineligible for License.
Ua No License shall be -ranted for adult uses or sexually-oriented business on an
remises where a licensee has been convicted of a violation of this Cha ter or
where any license hereunder has been revoked for cause, until one (1_) year has
elapsed after such. conviction or revocation.
Ub Except uses lawfully existina at the time of this Ordinance ado tion no license 0 .. M-NO-w—
shall be ranted for an. adult use or sexually - -oriented business that does not
meet all city code requirements, all building and fire- code reauir ments and all
provisions of state_ and federal law.
7. Nonconforming Uses. Any adult use or sexually- oriented business existing on the
effective date of the adoption of this ordinance .may be continued subject to the
following rovisions:
Lal No such adult use or sexually - oriented business shall be expanded or enlarged
except in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance;
Ub A nonconforming adult use or sexually- oriented business. hall be required to
apply for and receive an adult use license from the hr„. The cit,�does not require
a public hearing before issuing a license for the nonconforming adult use or
sexually- oriented business.
11
8_ Conditions of License Generally.
Ua Every, license shall be granted subiect t_ o the conditions in the following
subdivisions and all other provisions of this chapter_, and of anv applicable
sections of the Ma2lewood City Code., state and federal law.
Ub All licensed premises shall have the license posted in a cons icuous place..
Uc No minor shall be allowed in or on the premises of an adult use or sexually -
oriented business.
Ud Any designated inspection officer or law enforcement officer of the city, shall have
the right to enter, insaect. and search the premises of a licensee during business
hours.
Ue Every licensee shall be_responsible for the conduct of their place of business and
shall maintain conditions of this ordinance and the city code.
No adult goods, materials or services shall be offered sold transferred
conveyed, give s pl_a,.y+e d .or .bartere „d to any minor.
9 Conditions of License„ Adult Use Prinei2al.
The cily 2ermits adult use 2 dnci2 al and sexual! - oriented businesses only in the M -1
( light manufacturing) and M -2 (heavy manufacturing) zoning districts subiect to the
followi conditions:
No.adult_use principal or sexually-oriented, business shall. be located closer than
1 , 000 feet from any other adult use principal or sexually-oriented business in an
city. Measurements shahl be made in a straight line, _without w regard to city
boundaries, intervenin str uctures o„ r obj ects, from the near p oint of the actual
b siness premises of the adult use pdncipal or sexually- oriented business to the
nearest pgint of the actual business premis2s of any other adult use p rincig al or
sexual- oriented business.
No adult use Rrin cipal or sexual) - oriented business shall be located closer than
350 feet from any residential lot line lace of worshim school ublic 2ark ol2 en
s ace licensed family da -care home licensed grouRfamily da - care home
ublic libraa, or licensed child -care or da -care center in any cily. Measurements
,shall be made in a straight line, without regard to cit boundaries, intervening
structu or objects, from the ,nearest point of the actual business prremise;,nf
the _adult use nnci al or sexually-oriented business to the nearest pro e line - of
the premises or building used as a dwelling or residence, ,place of worshie
school, public park open space, licensed family day -ca home licensed 4_ roue
fermi v day -care home, public library, o lice child -care or day- care center.
f.cl No adult use ; n_ '_pal or,se_ xually-oriented business shall be located closer than
350 feet from any residential lot lin any .residential zoning. district or any
residential ,planned unit development (PUD) in any city. Measurements shall be
made in a�straight line, without regard t_ o city boundaries intervening structures or
objects, from the nearest point of the actual business ,premises of the adult use or
sexually oriented. business to the nearest residential lot line, ,boundary of the
residential zoning district or planned unit development PUD .
12
. All adult uses and sexually- oriented businesses must follow all of this code
jj e The city Rrohibits any buildinu owner or operator from having more than one (1) of
the following uses, tenants or activities in the same building or structure:
Adult Body Painting Studio
Adult Book Store
Adult Cabaret
Adult Car Wash
Adult Com2anionshiR Establishment
Adult Entertainment Facili
Adult Hotel or Motel
Adult Modeling Studio
Adult 'Sauna/Steam Room /Bath House
Adult Motion Picture Theater
Adult Mini- Motion Picture Theater
Adult Massage Parlor
Adult Health /Sports Club
Adult Novelty Business
Any business or establishment in which there is an emphasis on the
pre sentation,�,dis lay_, depiction, or description of "specified sexual activities" or
"specified_ anatomical areas" that the public could be see_
tZf An adult use 2rinci2al and sexual) -oriented businesses shall not sell or dis erase
nonintoxicating or intoxicating li uors nor shall it be located in a building that
contains a business that sells or dis enses nonntoxicatin orintoxicatina li uors.
IM No adult use rinci al and sexual) -oriented businesses entertainment shall
en a e .in an activit or conduct or ermit an other erson to engage in an
mom
activi or conduct in or about the adult use establishment that is prohibited by an
ordinance of Maplewood, the laws of the State of Minnesota or the United States
of America. Nothin in this ordinance shall be construed as authorizing or
p ermitt ing conduct that is prohibited or reg ulated b other statutes ordinances
includina but not limited to statutes or ordinances Drohibiting the exhibition sale o
distribution of obscene material generally. or the exhibition. sale or distributio of
: specified materials to minors.
Uh No adul_ t use princiRal or sexually- oriented businesses shall be conducted in any
manner that 2ermits the 2 or observation from any pro2 ertY not a2l2 roved
as an adult use of any materials depicting, describing or related to "Specified
Sexual Activities or "Specified Anatomical Areas" by any visual or audit
including disolay. decoration. lion. show window. sound transmission or other
means.
. Q i All adult use princi,a1 and sexual) -orie. rated businesses shall prominent!y display a
sign at the entrance and located within two feet of the door- openin device of the
adult -use establishment or section of the establishment devoted to adult books or
materials which states: "This business sells or displays material containing adult
themes. Persons under age 18 years of age shall not enter."
No person under the age of 18 shall be permitted on or in the pr, miser of anal_
use or sexual l business establishment. No person under the age o, of 18
13
shall be permitted access to material displayed, offered for sale, given
transferred, conveyed or rented by an adult use or sexually oriented business.
k Adult use principal and sexually- oriented businesses shalt not be open between
the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on the da s of Monday throu h Saturda
nor between 1:00 a.m. and 12:00_noon on Sunda
10._ Conditions of License ,Adult Use Accessory.
The city may, issue adult use accessory licenses to businesses or establishments
located in the BC SC (shopping center and M -1 Zoning Districts subject to the followin
requirements:
Sat The adult use - accesso shall comprise no more than twen 20 ercent of the
floor area or u to 500 s uare feet whichever is smaller, of the establishment
space, structure or building in which it is located.
Ub Displav areas for adult movie or video tape rentals or other products shall be
restricted from general view and shall be located within a separate room, for
which the access is in clear view and in the control of the Rerson res onsible for
the operation.
L cl Magazines and publications or other similar vroducts.classified or gualified as
adult uses shall not be accessible to minors and shall be covered with aw
or other means to Rrevent dis2lay of anv materials other than the 2ublication title.
Ud Adult use - accesso shall be prohibited from both internal and external
advertising and sionin4 of adult materials and products.
1 1. Revocation, Sus2ension or Nonrenewal of License.
Ua The. ci council may revoke suspend, or not renew a license u on
recommendation of the cit y manager that shows the licensee its owners
managers, employe a ents or any other interested parties have en in
any of the following conduct:
Fraud. deception or misrepresentation about securing the license.
Habitual drunkenness or intemperance in the use of dru s includina, but not
I imited to the use of drug defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 618.01
barbiturates, hallucino epic drugs. amphetamines. Benzedrine Dexedrine or
other sedatives,. deg essants_ stimulants. or tranquilizers.
U Englging in conduct involving moral to itude or 2ermitting or allowing others
within their eMplov or agencv to en a e in conduct involving moral to itude
or failing to prevent agents,, officers, or employees in engaging in conduct
involving moral turpitude.
4 Failure to follow any requirements of the ordinances of Maplewood about
sani taa and safety conditions, zoning requirements, building code
requirements or ordinances, the violation of which involves moral turpitude,
or failure to follow the requirements of this ordinance.
_
14
( 5 ) Conviction of an offense involving moral turpitude.
L bj The certificate holder may appeal such susaens on, revocation or non - renewal to
the citv council. The council shall consider the appeal at a reoularly scheduled
public hearing o or after ten days from service of the notice of appeal to the city
manager. At the conclusion of the hearing, the council may order:
That the revocation= suspen on or Nonrenewal be affirmed.
2 That the revocation sus ension or Nonrenewal be lifted and that the
certificate be returned to the. certificate holder.
The council may im ose at their discretion any additional terms conditions
or stipulations for the suspension or issuance of the certificate.
d. Sign Restrictions.
The following sign regulations shall a221V a221 to all adult use and sexually- dented
businesses in the ci . These regulations are to 2rotect children from ex osure to sexual) -
oriented or shockina signs and materials and to Rreserve the value of.prooedy near adult
use and sexuail oriented businesses. These re ulations are aside from any other 2rovision
of the cit y code.
1. All signs shall be flat wail or freestanding signs. No signs shall be located on the roof
or contain any flashing lights, movina elements or electronicall or mechanically-
chan9 messages.
2. The ci s si n re ulations for the zonin district where the business is located shall
regulate the. amount of allowable sign area and the number of ...allowed signs for an
adult use or sexualiy-onented business.
3. No merchandise photos. or pictures of the products or entertainment on the oremises
shall be disl2layeg in window areas or any area where th@y can be viewed from .the
sidewalk or public dght-of-wav adioining the bu or structure in which the adult use
or sexually oriented business is located.
4. No si ns shall be 2 in an .window. A two 2 s uare -foot si n may be_ laced on
_
the door to state hours of o eration and admittance to adults onl
e. P
Any person violating any 2rovision of this ordinance is auilty of a misdemeanor and u on
conviction shall be ounished not more than the maximum penalty for a misdemeanor as
2rescribed by state law.
f_ Severabilib►.
If an section subsection sentence clause or phrase of this code amendment is for an
reason held to be invalid such decision shall not affect the validityof the remaining ortions
of h this code amendment. The council declares that it would have adopted the code
amendment and each section subsection sentence, clause or 2 hrase of it irresi2ective of
the fact that anemone or more _sections,, _ subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases are
declared invalid.
15
SECTION 2. This section adds the followinc to the M"Iewood City Co de:
Sec. 36- -
186 13 Adult Use Princip Sexuall -oriented Businesses and Adult Use Accesso
,
subiect to the [ uirements in Chanter 17.
SECTION 3. This section adds the following to the LAM2Lqwood City Code:
Sec. 36-1 l3(a)(12)
(12) Adult. Use Accessory.
The ' adult use accesso licenses to businesses or establishments
� ma issue a
located in SC sho in center Zonln District subject to the re uirements in Ch a ter 17
and the foil
owing reouirements:
a. The
adult use accesso shall com rise no more than fifteen 16 ercent of the
ap�
floor area of the establishment or buildin in which it is located.
b. Qisplavareas for adult movie or video #a a rentals or other similar roducts shall
.be restricted from enera view and shall be located within a se arate room the
acce of which is in clear view and under the control of the erson res onsibfe
for the operation.
C. Mag azines and vu bl!cations or other similar roducts classified or aualified as
ad
ult uses shall not be accessible to minors and shall be cov red with a wra er
er ether means to
revent dis la of an materials other than the ublication tale.
d. Adult use - accesso shall be rohibi#ed from both internal and external
advertisina and sig of adult materials and. roducts.
e. i ne city ai5o 5n011 u I&I v all ak!wl oa wlw Mail w Uf I vi malm6••
. o%m%.& A,&r4nn an nei, apt inr m- wiry lice reauest in
SECTION
4. This ordina shall take effect after the city council approves it and. the official
newsoaper publishes it.
The Maalewood Qgy approved this ordinance on -0
P :/ . /adult2.mem
16
1111. NEW BUSINESS
A. Adult Use Ordinance
the staff report and answered questions from the
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented p
Melinda Coleman director of community development, suggested that Pat Kelly, the
commission. Me ,
Maplewood cit att orne be asked for s comments on, how the ordinance relates to the
y y, Pe
nsive plan. Commissioner Thompson felt the ordinance should clearly state that the
comprehe p
' will cross eo- p olitical
distances cited g boundaries in interpretation and application. Mr.
Thompson also thought the ordinance should specifically designate*the Maplewood department
' ' en comp laints. Ms. Coleman said this would be a licensed facility and
that would handle any citiz p
complaints should be handled by the police department. Licenses are issued through the city
clerk's office and can be revoked.
' asked about the possibility of having a further definition of holding
Commissioner Ericson as p tY
corporations so that na mes s of actual owners could not be hidden. Ms. Ericson was also of the
opinion person ' that a who had previously had an adult -use license revoked should become
permanently ineligible Y
n for an future such license. Commissioner Rossbach felt this consequence
r a misdemeanor, but was agreeable to requiring a longer period of time before
was too harsh fo r. � ve
issuance of a new license. Commissioner Kittridge thought the proposed ordinance seemed ry
tight and anticipated no problems.
• Planning Commission recommend acceptance of the a
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Plan g adult
n c.
business ordinance, amended as follows: (1) page 9, Section entertainment/ sexually-oriented . a -
ldin co oration so identity of owners is public, (2.) page 10, Section 3. ( } 2. further define. ho g rp II
nt rice "u on rejection of an applications for a license, the finance director shall
delete last se e , , p 1 Y . "
paid," (3) a e 11 Section 5. {f} - add has had an adult use license revoked
refund the. amount p page similar to this ordinance, (4) page 12, Section 9. (a), {b), and (c} � _
under an ordnance
or statute simi
delete " Map an �n ' Maplewood" and add yin city,' and (5) page 15 - add a new section after d. to
. Y
address compliant processing.
Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
H W/
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Pauline Staples, Recreation Manager
RE: Maplewood In Motion Bid for 1996
DATE: January 31, 1996
PROPOSAL
.Action by Council
Endorse
Mod.ifie
Re j e et e d.,. ,
Date
It is proposed that Maplewood in Motion be published and mailed eleven times in 1996
as follows:
- Four Issues would be thirty -six (36) pages in length
- Seven Issues would be eight (8) pages in length
- Each newsletter would be 8.5" x 11' page size
- 15,000 copies mailed per issue
- Paper stock would be 60# white offset recycled
- Ink would be black plus one color on the cover page
BACKGROUND
Maplewood In Motion is currently the only publication that the City has to communicate
to residents of the City of Maplewood. This newsletter is currently published and mailed
twelve times per year. In 1995, we adjusted the newsletter to adapt to four larger issues
to incorporate the Parks and Recreation /Community Center programs.
The style and format of the newsletter would remain the same with each page being
8.5" x 11 ". We would continue with one PMS color on the cover page and text would
be black. Stock paper color would be white offset recycled. The Maplewood In Motion
logo would remain the same at this time with the possibility of change in 1996.
Bids were received and opened on January 30, 1996, 10:00 am. Bids were received
from Nystrom Publishing Company, Inc. and Century Graphics. Results of the bids
were as follows:
Nystrom Publishing Company, Inc. $30,970.88
Century Graphics . $48,847.00
Recommendation
It is recommended that City Council approve the bid quotation from Nystrom Publishing
Company, Inc. for $30,970.00 to provide publishing services for eleven issues of
Maplewood In Motion for the year 1996. The total budget for 1996 for Public Relations
is $66,620.00 to include publishing and postage.
AGENDA REPORT : �..a��'
Endorsed..,
Modifie
To: City Manager Michael McGuire
Reject e c� .
From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. Collins Z��
:fat e ,.
Subject Purchase of Marked Patrol Vehicles
Date. January 16, 1996
Introduction
Money was allocated in the 1996 budget to purchase patrol vehicles.
We, request uest authorization to purchase four 1996 patrol vehicles
re
(two for the Patrol Division and two for the Paramedic Division).
Background
The Police Department can purchase patrol vehicles at only one time during the
p
year.
The P urchases are made in conjunction with the State of Minnesota, the City of
St. Paul, Ramsey County, Washington County and many Ramsey and Washington
County cities.
The vehicles are purchased under State of Minnesota Contract #408408 and cost
$19,180 each.
The vehicles must be ordered.now for delivery in June or July.
Recommendation
As this is the only time during 1996 that we can purchase these vehicles, we
recommend that authorization be given to make this purchase.
Action Required
We recommend that this be P resented to the City Council for their approval.
KVC :js
AGENDA ITEM /
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Ken Haider Public Works Director
FROM: Lance Lundsten Public Works Coordinator
SUBJECT: Park Mowing Equipment Replacement
DATE: January 30, 1996
Action by Council:
Endorsed .,..,_...�.....�........v.
Red ectecl_._„
Date
The VEM capital outlay for 1996 includes an amount of $17 for Toro
mower replacement. Because we own various attachments, that do not need replacin
and will not match other brands of equipment, the power unit must be a Toro brand.
Request council approval of purchase of one replacement mower, as quoted b
p � q Y
M.T.I. Distributing Co. in the amount of $16,820.61. This amount includes 6.50%
Minnesota sales tax.
AGENDA ITEM //'
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Ken Haider
Act-i 'on bY Co '.Inch
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Lance Lundsten
Pick up Truck Replacement
February 2, 1996
Endorsed...
ModifJed.,
Re j a of ed„�,„
Date
. The 1996 VEM capital outlay operating budget contains an amount of
$30,890.00 for the purchase of replacement pick-up trucks for the Park and Utilit
p p p y
supervisors. The State of Minnesota bid has been awarded to Erickson Chevrolet of
Dawson Minnesota. The cost is $14,319.28 each. This p rice is for 1/2 ton 2wd
Chevrolet model C1 500 trucks. I have been able to secure firm price q uotes from a
local dealer, for identical units, in the amount of $13,999.00 each, or $320.28 per unit
less. Because state bid prices historically have been the best option for local
government vehicle purchases I have contacted Mr. Dale Meyer, contract administrator
of the materials management division State of Minnesota to request information
regarding the price difference. He indicated the Minnesota legislature has declared
certain areas of the state as "economically depressed ". Dealers in these areas are
awarded bids that are higher than dealers in other areas. Not only re their prices
Y p
higher, it is also inconvenient to do business, due to the need to use long- distance
phone calls and difficulty in contacting knowledgeable fleet sales staff.
Request council award purchase of two 1/2 ton pick -up trucks to Polar Chevrolet in the
amount of $27,998.OG
AGENDA NO.
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager
FROM: Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager
RE: Presentation of Results from Community Survey
DATE: February 12, 1996
Colon by Council %,
Endorsed
Modified -- -
Rejecte�
Date
Decision Resources., Ltd., conducted a random telephone survey of 400 Maplewood residences
during late Fall 1995. Dr. Bill Morris will provide an overview of significant findingsin the 1995
survey, as well as comparisons with results from surveys of Maplewood conducted by DRL in
1990 and 1992. In general, residents are very supportive of and satisfied with their City
government and the services it provides - -in fact, the results are among the most positive in the
metropolitan area.
The revised amount in the budget to conduct this survey was $11,700.
Z -4;L
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Holiday Store - Addendum
LOCATION: SE Corner—. McKnight and Lower Afton Roads
DATE: February 6, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council.
Endorsed
Modify. ed
Rejected
Dat
Mark Nelson, of Holiday Companies, has revised his site plan for the proposed Holiday Station
Store on the corner of Lower Afton Road and McKnight Road. He made this revision because of
the council's requirement on January 22, 1 -996 to provide only one curb cut along each street.
Mr. Johnson's revised plan proposes one curb cut along Lower Afton Road and two along
McKnight Road. Refer to the letter on page 2 and the site plan on page 3.
Mr. Nelson said he did not understand that he would Only be allowed one curb cut on each
street He is requesting approval of the curb cuts as shown.
p:secl2 \holiday.te
Attachments:
1 Letter from Mark Nelson dated February 6, 1996
2. Revised Site Plan date- stamped February 6, 1996
3. Memo and attachments dated January 16, 1996
4. Revised Site Plan (full size) date - stamped February 6, 1996 (separate attachment)
Q 61196 08 :42 FAX 6128301674 03 ,-0O.3
Attachmnt 1
Holiday Companies
t.t N. i )t t If F. jhn� t1't'`:►
tit ►rh %1 WI I'T ! N1A)I AII 1.i�:F�.l:, P () Iit=1\ I; :'d 1�i1t+1�7�Af•t.rt.l:• t+il� ;; I�Itt ! 1 �1:•13�!► U; UU i lAa f 10 tl!l} tfllLJ
(10111T tlFIM: 54 % -%', t_►1I) SHAK17WEL RD. i !.1AIL aL• ►L'11:CS` 1•i i 1l1:1:� %Iko 1, INN MN * ,4.10 ! t'll. ti1':')!I S X1111 / 1AX W2.421.S2
Feb 6, 1996
Melinda Coleman VIA MESSENGER
Director of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1$30 East County Road 6
Maplewood, MN 65109
RE: Revised Driveway Locations for Proposed Holiday stationstore
SE Corner of McKnight and Lower Afton Roads., Ma p lewood Minnesota
Dear Ms. Coleman:
As requested at the January 22, 1998 City Council meeting, enclosed are seven ( 7) p rints
of our site plan showing revised driveway locations for our proposed Stationstore at
McKnight and Lower Afton Roads. Also enclosed is a reduced cop of this plan (8 112 11
x
We were able to move the driveway on Lower Afton Road awa y from the inte rsection an
additional 35 feet. Bo th driveways on McKnight were moved back 15 feet. You will note
the second /shared driveway on McKnight now alig with the driveway from th
� y e
Shamrock Plaza, and we were able to add green space /landscaping to this area.
Please call me at 830 -8787 if you have any questions. Thank you.
a,
Sincerely,
HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES, INC.
Mark W. Nelson
Manager Real Estate
/mwn35
Enclosure
FEB 0 6 1995
.'' 0� 1�10
( JU s s) � , . . �_ : , N �. ,
2
�2 06. 96 08:41 FAX 612830/6 Chi► (:)gi3O1 3
Fax 612-- 476 -4939 Feb 5 '96 17:51 P. '01
-- - - - - -- .. -- --. Attachment 2
�' �;-• �r• rrr. �. r�rr�- Prrrr-R.- ..- f- rrrrrtirrrrrr�r r �►r•Prw �.- 1- �+'�rrrrr �r
4
•
+
! r
�7
E
t-'
AN
IF I
:;� tt
r�
%; m ME I
lapin am
apin
lapin I.Mal M96 t
./r
r ` r
1
•
3
fail E B 0 (-,t
t � a�:a: +�r}.+►74.: 1. u�: 10.i•w.+Y�'�4r•:�. a•v -;rrr� ��
M� W..t 'Wa�y� �' �•I.a�� 1 l'w: ✓s•.. u.'..: F r .......s '
OV.rar.�:
rR'R.�.`R 1fr M`w►T N f Ar � .1Y M P w r.t K` R• ww. A P •. •wv
Attachment 3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager
FROM: Melinda Coleman, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Holiday Store
DATE: January 16, 1996
INTRODUCTION
At the December 4, 1995, city council meeting, a public hearing was held for the proposed
Holiday Store at the southeast corner of McKnight and Lower Afton Roads. At this meeting the
city council requested additional information on the following subjects:
1. sanitary sewer backup at 328 McKnight Road South.
2. Traffic concerns at the intersection of Lower Afton Road and McKnight Road.
3. Driveway locations and need for cross easements.
4. Nature of police calls at this location.
5. Recommendation from watershed district on need for sedimentation pond.
6. Design and environmental concerns with car wash.
7. Site design elements, including use of Amur maples for landscaping, sight triangle
obstructions, and restrictions on outside storage.
Items 1 -3 - These have been addressed in a memorandum from Ken Haider on page 2. The
requirement for cross easements on the driveways has been added to the conditional use
permit resolution on page 35 in the December 4, 1995, staff report.
Item 4 - The police call log for 1994 and 1995 for this intersection has been provided. This
indicates that there were a total of 61 police calls with a wide range of violations and
assistance. (Seepages 8 -10.)
Items 5 and 6 - Additional information has been provided by Mark Nelson of Holiday
Companies. See the attached letter and information starting on page 11. The watershed
district has indicated to staff that they do not require a pond for this project. A letter from them
is included on page 21.
Item 7 - The site plan will be amended to remove Amur maples from the landscaping plan.
Restrictions on outside storage of merchandise has been added to the conditional use permit
resolution on page 35 in the December 4, 1995, staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
See the recommendations in the December-4, 1995, staff report.
p :sec12- 281holiday. me
Attachments:
1. Memo from Ken Haider dated December 29, 1995
2. Maplewood Police log dated December 28, 1995
3. Letter from Mark Nelson of Hoiiday Stationstores dated January 12, 1996
4. Letter from the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed Board dated January , 16 1996.
5. Staff report of December 4, 1995
Attachment 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melinda Coleman, Director of Community Development
FROM: Ken Haider, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Holiday Store Proposal
DATE: December 29, 1995
The city council requested additional information on two specific subjects at a recent
council meeting concerning this proposal. The first concern is the sanitary sewer
backup at 328 McKnight Road South that occurred within the last year. I have attached
the sewer backup report dated January 31, 1995, concerning this incident. According
to our records the city was notified at 9 a.m. that a backup had occurred. The main line
sewer was cleared by 9:20 a.m. and things were back to normal. The home at 328
McKnight Road South, however, did sustain damage and it is described in more detail
in the attached handwritten note from the sewer division concerning the incident.
The cause of the backup was tree roots in the 12 inch main line sewer. It is not
uncommon for stoppages of this nature to be caused by tree roots removed from some
upstream location becoming lodged in the city sewer anywhere down the line.
The public works department annually publishes an article in the Maplewood in Motion
concerning the sanitary sewer. The last article is attached for reference. The article
indicates the proper notification procedure to report a backup and also reminds the
homeowners that if they do have their sewer service line cleaned that the notify the
Y Y
public works department so that we can check the downstream pipes to make sure they
are not plugged.
The second issue concerns traffic at the intersection of Lower Afton Road and
McKnight Road. I talked to Dan Soler of Ramsey County. He reiterated the same
opinions he. expressed in the original staff report, that being the intersection does not
have any significant traffic problems at this time. Both McKnight Road and Lower Afton
Road have adequate capacity to handle the traffic. The most recent traffic counts
available are those from 1993. They are as follows:
Lower Afton Road east of McKnight Road
5,300 ADT
McKnight Road south of Lower Afton Road
8,600 ADT
McKnight Road north of Lower Afton Road
10 ADT
The four -way stop is functioning well at the present time. Mr. Soler believes it will
continue to operate well after construction of the proposed Holiday Store.
K
Holiday Store 2 December 29, 1995
There is also a concern about_ the location of the two driveways closest to the
intersection. The Lower Afton Road driveway is setback 85 feet from McKnight Road.
Ingress for this driveway is not a problem since it is downstream of the intersection.
Therefore, the driveway should have no effect on Lower Afton Road traffic. The
McKnight Road driveway is 125 feet back . from the intersection. This is adequate to
store at least five vehicles in each lane, for a total of 10 on ,McKnight Road, without
blocking the driveway. If more vehicles are stacked waiting for the four -way stop
ingress for south bound traffic on McKnight Road may be interrupted. However, under
those conditions an intelligent driver would continue south on McKnight Road to the
next driveway and use that into the Holiday Store. Again, ingress should not be a
problem from this driveway because the four -way stop sign at the intersection does
create breaks in the traffic and should allow reasonable access to the public street.
KGH
jC
Attachments
4
DATE:
�.�
LAJ EZ F:Z IE3 hick I= t< U F=> F:Z EZ F=> C3 F::Z""r
ADDRESS OF BACKUP J
Maw *=meow a.—
DACK'UP REPORTED TO:
4-ma 4mom dm� -Mob 4maw 4-up 4� Amp Amum BY: 4107
PERSONNEL. DISPATCHED TO SITE: �.�. ,� �' ,�.�,�.,�,_, I ME: 1�
- -- -T IME:
STOPAGE CORRECTED:
T I M E
CAUSE OF STOPAGE:
EQUIPMENT USED:
- -H OURS:
DESCRIBE DAMAGE: 44AA -t c ?" w l
e 4
mud
1� loom ft�
son'
4mmus 0 4mm 400b W40 amm
mum wqm—� moo
LIST STATEMENTS BY CREW/PROP. OWNER REGARDING DAMAGE OR POSSIBLE CLAIM,
"I 1-ler-Ile-14-1- 11-W.
(= U M F=> L. I=. "r 1—= E;.K [.="r C: " B .
ADDRESS OF STOPAGE.
DOWNSTREAM UPSTREAM
. M,HoNOo, M.H- NO.
Of
--DISTANCE
E;`rFZ I (='r NU ��' mwm�
5
,
•a,
+ �.+/ ���' `� �•; ' `./ 4 f nc • �'.�;.' _'> r 1 y.e � i t� +'i i�r'L...... - �►' +' � �' � �f ark , , /
� r
. �" �•' ._ n`�„ �iC { '`�'�. �... -- �,f',.✓ J ' °!� - . ,� 00 i� • 1 �+,w - `..t �..�J�r:� �.� �-' +./ ' « �.�'"rt a - �,f
4 -'or
j�
�/� r,,.,,G; _ ..I.+- 'sue w`� 1 �' M' 7�"4'.. '� l� 'rt C� � , �`'•`� • l /'•$� // • ' ,./"•� -. (,�. J ,
r'
"P P t:'i ,_ �.. C ...�..,� .A� . o' - �.,' . - -/► s►t.+r �:'-� �..: r •.j;.�,�"' ~ 't��%�!. {� ", 1 / '`y
r
- ..' ' f ��� /t t" F:.. , i I ^r J r i � , i f�" 1 ' `r C . �,r+ �, r �! f . P i� �(�' " J V jd 1� - t.
1 ! '
cr'
;�,� /�� r ,. y'�.. �. ,.i��..� y ;• fi r'" ..� • •t'� °'.-. •b4�a,� �'+'- !'�..� !' "�..�' �F.�� � •�"T L �_.,� •� ^ � �!^ �•. �y� y i/ A -Rr ��
' f 1 f + _-t �y f �J 'jam•^
Al
W.7- \77/� ✓'+ . � �. .f�Gr�� •" I .�. 5/� � �� •f rwa•► >rf T�� T"'� , � � I ► ,.r+ v��.r
je
c
t
��• i ��� fs a r � �� , IY �����✓�s++ •. ✓Cr ~ �" • I��� r �'��I ��`.��Y ••.! 1...�� �- ' � ��. ° � �r�or
a..' � � .i'•� � � :. �.. . a{ �'.'�,p�e� ���' + «'L�� � t w A.• �� + mss �, f - �r��ti./f: -'A+ ��{�.w A'� ✓
.� . .' t - tv "-�• ice. �'r! ' Ile-
loge f i �- Z.• y!�' �' 3s r r °' " G.t -�s�- t;. �s' y " .ri" ,e►"�i`.. I /^�
"'� -L•-iG .� �✓',✓' ...- ( ' � " v ^ T :* I.�•- lr.�'�.... �.•'''Jo# .04e.",
4 `5
Public Works
lbtir Sewer System A GWded Twin
Your sanitary sewer is very niticli like your «vatcr
lieater you don't think about it much until it doesn't
work. Sewers are something that are taken for granted -
out of sight, out of mind - until the out of sight part stops
working.
A basic understanding of the plumbing and sai itar
sewer systems in your house will help you to know what
to do if waste water does not drain front your house. The
sanitary sew er s y steni bcgilis with the drains inside �•oiir
house. All of the drains from the sinks, toilets, etc., arc
piped to the sanitary sewer service tliat exits your House
underground and connects to the salutary seNver main
under the street. Eacli drain has a "trap" that prcN
sewer. gasses and odors froth entering the House. Each
drain also has a roof vent pipe that cxliausts gasses
through a chimney -like stack and admits fresh air to the
drains. Vents maintain the pressure behind the flow of
drain water and wastes, thus prevcnting «•ater front being
siphoned out of the traps.
The sewer service line is typically a four -inch diameter
cast -iron pipe (plastic in homes built after 1980), and is
usually instilled under the basement floor. A clean -out
opening is installed just before the pipe leaves the house.
In case of a blockage in the sewer service line, plumbers
use this clean out to eliminate blockages between the
house and the sewer plain. After the scwcr scn•ice line
leaves the house, it typically connects to a six -inch
diameter clay pipe which the connects to t elglit -inch
diameter clay pipe sewer main. The typical length of the
sewer service line from the house to the centerline of the
street (or the sc «•er main) is 60 feet. The first 30 feet of
the scN % line is typically cast iron, and the remaining 30-
foot run to the sewer main is clay pipe.
Drain pipes and A•ent pipes, collectively called the
drain- wastc- N or DWV system, niust «vork together to
drain water and waste. If a vcnt pipe is plugged, the drain
will burp and bubble as water drains out. If only one
section of plunibing does not drain, it is usually an
intcriial plumbing problem Howevcr, if no drains work,
or the entire system drains slowly, or tlic worst case
scenario occurs - waste hater conies back through the
basement floor drain - the problem is outside of the house
in eitlier the sc% % senice line or the sewer plaid.
If you suspect a blockage outside of ;your house,
contact our Public works depal at 770 -4550 (or
call Maplewood Police at 777 -8191 after normal
business hours). Our utilitti• dc�irtment will check the
sewer main through a manhole to determine if tllcre is a
blockage in the sewer plain line. If tllcre is no problem in
the street, the blockage is probably between the house and
the sewer main. Tree -root invasion at the joints of the old
style clay pipe is a co problein NN'liere mature trees
exist.
If there is a blockage in tic sewer scn'ice line, it is the
homeowner's responsibility. Our utilit department
requests that tlicy be notified after a scNN service line has
been cleaned. Typically, the cleaning process puslies an
accumulation of tree roots and se«•agc into the sewer
plain that may cause a blockage of the plain, and conse-
(111cnt ly cause Sewer
backups iii your
neiglibors' homes.
Most of the City's
sewe mains were
installed ill the late
'50's and ea rl y '60's.
Much of the systelll is
eiglit -inch clay pipe
tli, connects to the
large Metropolitan
Waste Control
interceptors that
ultimately convey
sewage to the Pigs
Eye Treatment Plant
ill St. Patil. Otir
utility department
Clealis aiid Iilalntains
1 38 tulles of saIi tary
sewer and 12 pump
stations.
7
Attachment 2
RUN DATE.; 218-DEC-095 MAPLEWOOD POL I rE P GE I
RUN TIME: 16:47
REPORT #., 5 suffi.ary, totals only CFS CA H LLS RECEIVED STATISTICS SUMMARY rfs-print'26064
5H71
7/ !2 b Juris & i v i
DT-TM RPTD: 01'01.19-4 0000 "-'/"''1'5 00010 ubmar
C: . i-% ACT H)T I T V
TURI F
SORT SEQUENL.L,.- (3 31 A GE. N C. Y W A -.J L. -j t1 {: . J. s I I
I IMM 'RY
T
OT L
REPORT DETAI
ff�TTIINS: 8 line headin use preset pa sin spaced
. z aw --F 12
FIELD NAME RANGE SELECTIONS 6 R 0 U P S E 1, - E'
AGENCY 001 - 001
J
DATE-TM REPORTIELD 011/0.11:94 0-000 - l7/Q; 00:00
STREET NAME. GROUP *lower afton* fmckni
I- I-
INTERSECT STREET GROUP *lower of ter;* *mckni
�1681
RUN DATE,: 28-DEC-95 P1 A P L E W 0 0 D P 0 L I CE
RUN TIME: 16:47 * * * E N F 0 R S * * *
REPORT #: 5 summar totals onl CFS CALLS RECEIVED STATISTICS SUMMARY
DT-TM RPTD: 01/01/94 0000 - 12/27/95 0000 (Summar b Juris & CFS Activit
SORT SEQUENCE: (91) AGENCY, JURIS & C S ACTIVITY
PAGE 2
cfs-print2ftOW647
"A
SUMMARY
TOTAL
AGENCY
001
JUG' IS
01
ACTIVITY
09001
TOTAL
DESC:
SPEEDING
9
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09002
TOTAL
DESC:
DISOBEY STOP SIGN
•
AGENCY
001
JURIS
0i
ACTIVITY
09003
TOTAL
DEISM::
FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09027
TOTAL
DES C:
EXHAUST NOT MUFFLED
I
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09028
TOTAL
DESC:
DEFECTIVE LIGHT VIOLATION
3
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09033
TOTAL
DE C;
ALL OTHER MOVING VIOLATIONS
I
AGENCY
001
JUG` IS
01
ACTIVITY
09201
TOTAL
DESC:
FAIL TO DISPLAY CURRENT REGIS
3
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09211
TOTAL
DES C:
DRIVING WITHOUT INSURANCE
1
AGENCY
001
JURIS
011
ACTIVITY
09214
TOTAL
DESC:
ALL OTHER DL VIOLATIONS
I
AGENC'Y
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
092261
TOTAL
DESC.2
NO PROOF OF INSURANCE
S
AGENCY
001
jURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09229
TOTAL
DESC:
DRIVING AFTER WITHDRAWAL
i
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09315
TOTAL
DESC:
VEH (REC STOLEN OUTSIDE AGENCY
I
AGENCY
001
jURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09420
TOTAL
DESC:
PER INJ M VEH ACC (FOB OT /HIGH)
I
AGENCY
001
JUR*IS
01
ACTIVITY
09440
TOTAL
DES C.-
PRO DAM M VEH A ST/HIGH)
2
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09444
TOTAL
DESC:
DEER STRUCK
2
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09730
TOTAL
DES C:
SICK CARED FOR (ALL MED RUNS)
I
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09802
TOTAL
DES•:
PUBLIC ASSIST
2
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09310
TOTAL
DESC:
OTHER CITIZEN COMPLAINT
2
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09821
TOTAL
DESC:
SUES= ICIOUS' VEH ICLES
AGENCY
001
JURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09825
TOTAL
DESC:
PARKING COMPLAINTS
AGENCY
001
jURIS
01
ACTIVITY
09901
TOTAL
DESC:
SERVE WARRANTS
2
AGENCY
001
JUG` IS
01
ACTIVITY
09911
TOTAL
DESC:
RADAR USE
7
AGENCY
001
JUSTE
01
ACTIVITY
09913
TOTAL
DESC:
UNLICENSED VENDORS
i
"A
'
RUNDAlE:28~0EC-95 MAPL[WOUD POLlCE PAGE 3
RUN TlME:.16:47 * * * E N F O RS * * *
REPORT #: 5 sum���ls�� �C����G��I��� c�rint�r�t1�
DT-TM RPTD� OU01B� �OOO - 12/27/95 0O0O (Summary hv Juri� &OB Activitv)
UMMARY
AGENCY 001 JUR S 01 ACTIVITY 09919 TOTAL
AGENCY O01 ��lS 01 ACTIVITY 09922 TOTAL
AGENCY 001 �lS
� 01 ACTIVITY d8500 TOTAL
AG UP. NCY 8A4 � lS 01 ACTIVITY n307O TUTAL
'
'
AGENCY 001 JURlS 01 ACTIVITY tg159 TOTAL
AGENCY 00 1 JURlS 01 ACTIVITY vh011 TOTAL
AGENCY N� ��IS 01 AC7lVlTY 0200 TOTAL
AGENCY 001 JURIS N T�AL
AGENCY OOi TOTAL
� REP ORT TOTAL
DESC: TRAFFIC (EXCEPT DWI)
D[SC/ VEB UNLOCKS
DESC; DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESS ON
DESC: DISTURB P[ACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE
DESC; THEFT-LESS 200-MS-MOTOR VEH_OTH PROP
DESC/ No Table Entry for this Activity
3
i
1
1
1
i
1
6l
6l
6�
10
Attachment 3
Holiday Companies
GEN. OFFICE: 4567 WEST 80th STREET / MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1224 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 / PH. 612-830-8 ! FAX 612- 830 -8864
CREDIT OFFICE: 5501 W. OLD SHAKOPEE RD. / MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1216 MINNEAPOLIS, .ti1N 55440 / PH. 612- 921 -5200 / FAX 612- 921 -5295
January 12, 1996
' F f Co I NIV
Melinda Coleman
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
VIA MESSENGER
RE: Additional Information for January 22, 1996 City Council Meeting
Holiday Stationstores, Inc.
McKnight and Lower Afton Roads, Maplewood, Minnesota
Dear Ms. Coleman:
As requested at the December 11, 1995 City Council meeting, delivered with this letter
are the following items:
Customer Count: We estimate a daily average of 800 -950 customers will use our
proposed convenience store /superette by the second full year of
operation.
Car Wash: Enclosed is information explaining where the waste water exits the
car wash system.
Storm Water Pond: As we have discussed, the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed
District does not require a pond for our site. Enclosed for your use
is a copy of the subwatershed boundaries surrounding our site.
Shared Access: We are willing to structure our easements with Mr. Johnson in a
manner that gives the City the ability to adjust the location of the
shared driveways if the future need arises with development of Mr.
Johnson's remaining property. We wish to construct the driveways
in their proposed locations when our property is developed.
�~ a FooD
ALES
Holiday
11
Ms. Coleman
January 12, 1996
Page 2
We hope this additional information assists your preparation for the Council's meeting.
Please call me at 830 -8767 if you have any questions, or if Y ou wish to discuss our
application.
Thank you for your continued cooperation.
Sincerely,
HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES, INC.
Mark W. Nelson
Manager Real Estate
/mwn33
cc: Arnold E. Johnson
Gerald E. Frisch
Gary Gandrud
David D. Hoeschen
12
m
LOWER AFTON ROAD
LAm6 LAB DRAINAGE WAY
LA 4
wows
3
LA 5 LAm 13 1 A.177
r '
A 0 e , V V • U . ...ice... ��1. -ARCtn H ..
SI NGL SINGLE DOUBLE
.., PASS SPAT P ,SS FRONT r�,�S ;-�
`, ►,�',Sy PRE- H..If= ri ROC�•C� TIr,... C... _..
�, ^•t �.��; P SS ^,� t:�� �P
-•�� O'• PP- .c�S�J� = PANEL BLAST ��Y
r r•,CF.AG c S AK
I
V
.f
0 to
Aa
ry I1 HIn-H p? S U .
FAC 4KA
; Ire;`
A % R
�► c
11 �, \ ... ,, -.�..
$Vill
y 3 ' .
2
X0.5
�I, �...i
L I/tl � J w
3
•...1
• vvv
.�?03
•
J.�
17
17
�•
I
' 4 MIN 10 " C
.4 i ��
5.6
51.17 ,
a. ,
Of
----
--- f� � -.—
- . z f N- �..�rr. •T' 5 �" _'T �1 Cam- . fr
01
TD
Z
Not Professionally Dram.
FOR INFORMATION ONLY -
Car Wash
Water Discharge Explanation
Car W ash Svstem
Water js passed through trench drain on bay floor to collect sand and soils, then
through waste trap and info sanitary sewer.. The biodegradable, environmentally safe
chemicals are diluted by the wash water. Wash cycle water and rinse cycle water
drained to sanitary sewer.
Trench drain in bay floor is maintained several times per week to insure sedimentation
of sand and soils. Waste trap is maintained on a periodic basis.
16
• TEL Jan 15 '96 10:11 No.000 P.US
b kRD ACE=LEE
)
'"'7#49 0010VArORC" MATERIAL SAF ETY DATA SWEET
Since 1932 Thio MODS complies with 29orn -i9mizoo
SECTION I IDENTIFICATION
Manufacturer.- GRACE-LEE PRODUCTS, INC. Product Name: 947 COLD WAX
2640 Second Street N.E. Date Prepared: 11 SEPT 96
Minneapolis, MN 66418 Replaces: NEW
Information: 612-379-2711 Product ID: FP 022
y io ............
SECTION HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS11DENTITy INFoR4fA TION
HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS GAS# OSHA PEL ( ppm TL V ( PP2? 2 (OPTIO
ACGIH NA L)
Contains no hazardous components
SEC T/0A1 /// HEAL TH HAZARD DA TA
PRIMARY ROUTES OF ENTRY: Inhalation: Yes Skin: Yes In Yes E Yes
HEAL TH HAZARDS (ACUTE and CHRONIC)
E y e o r. skin contact can produce irritation. In can cause Indi Excessive Inhalation of mist or
vapors can cause lrrflafion of respirator tract
CARCINOGENICITY,* N7P.* No /ARC MONOGRAPHS: No OSHA REGULATED: No
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF EXPOSURE, Redness or irritation to e and skin. Possible dizziness if inhaled
excessivel
MEDICAL CONDITIONS GENERALL YAGGRA VA TED BY EXPOSURE: None known.
EMERGENC Y FIRST A ID PROCEDURES
E I
d.
g ,*
.. . . ........
..........
!-- Ak
.. . .... ..
..........
.2 %X
..........
ob
........ .......... vxc
... ........
A
X'V, XIN: ...............
rp M.NX-ft ...............
V V. i.*Ry-..r
...........
.... . .....
.......... • % ........
AMP. 'MI....
_V ..
Y "'d i*"0*'*"%' ..... .
SECT/ON I V FIRE AND EXPL OSION HAZARD DA TA
FLASH POINT ( Method Used >2000F
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use media suitable for surroundin area.
SPECIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES: Routine firefi procedures ade
UNUSUAL FIREAND EXPLOSION HAZARDS.- No unusual fire and explosion hazard
17
TEL Jan 15 '96 10:13 No. P . O�j
SEC TION V R C TI V1 TY oA T
STABILITY: Stable CONDITIONS TO A VOID: None
INCOMPA TIBILI TY (Materlals to avoid): Strong oxidizing agents
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Hones
HAZARDOUS POL YMERIZA TION. Will not occur CONDI TO AVOID.- None
SECTION VI PHYSICAL CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
BOILING POINT: 212 SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 0.920 typical
VAPOR PRESSURE firm Hg). WIE MEL TING POINT. N/A
VAPOR DENSITY (Air -w 1): N!E EVAPORA RATE (Butyl acetate = T) 0.95
SOL UBILI TY IN WA TER Complet e 1 %pH = 7.0-8. 0 typical. '
APPEARANCE AND ODOR. Clear, yellow liquid; slight petroleum odor
SECTION Vll PRECA UT/DNS FOR SA FE HA NDL ING AND USE
STEPS TO BE TAKEN IF MA TERIAL IS SPILLED OR RELEASED:
Contain spill. Mop, scoop, or vacuum up as much as possible for reuse or disposal. Flush remainder
to sewer with plenty of water. Use caution as area will be slippery.
WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD
In accordance with local, state and federal regulations.
PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORAGE
Store In cool, dry place. Keep product covered.
O THER PRECAUTIONS. KEEP O UT OF REACH OF CHILDREN.
SECTION V11 CONTROL MEASURES
VENTILA T /ON LOCAL EXHAUST: Usually adequate SPECIAL: N/A
MECHANICAL (General): Satisfactory 0THER: NIA
PROTECTIVE GLOVES. Rubber or plas tic
EYE PROTECTION: Safety glasses recommended
OTHER PROTECTIVE CLOTHING OR EQUIPMENT.- Routine protective clothing and equipment adequate.
WORWHYGIENE PRACTICES: Normal safe housekeeping practices adequate.
HMIS/NFPA TYPE RATINGS
Health /Blue: 1 0 = Minimal 4 = Severe
Flammablthy /Red.• 0 1 = Slight
ResclIvltylYe /low: 0 2 = Moderate
Specjfic/kVhlte: 3 = Serlous
The information presented in the MSDS is believed to be accurate. However, nothing contained in this information is to be
taken as a warranty of any kind by GRACE -LEE PRODUCTS, INC. The user should review any recommendations in the specific
context of the intended use to determine whether they are appropriate.
ON •
TEL Jan 15 10 : U 6 1 0 - U" U_ 13 F-' . C,
'j �'1`; D c:
Rhl AA CcE=L.EEr-
L b )
8 'THE MATERIAL SAFETY D
Since 1932 This MSDS complies with 29 CFR 19 10, 1 200
SECTION I - IDENTIFICATION
Manufacturer: GRACE-LEE PRODUCTS. INC. Product Name: SUPER SUDS 6033-B
• 2640 Second Street N.E. Date Prepared: 08 FEB 94
Minneapolis, MN 55418 Replaces: NEW
-Information: 612-379.2711
Pgoduct •LCL. X-P
AM. AN
X0. 2..
�U-B'k M Cd?W-- 401 DRM4--
-MZ4 , .:....: a.:..
SECTION ff HAZ4RDOUS INGREDIENTS/IDENTITY INFORMA TION
HAZ48DOUS COMPONENTS CAS
OSHA PEL fppin) A CGIH TL V (ppm) %
(OPTIONAIJ
No hazardous components
SECTION I// HE4L TH HAZARD DA TA
ROUTES OF ENTRY: Inhalation: Yes Skin: Yes Inges6on: Yes Eyes: Ye S
HEAL HAZ4RDS (ACUTE and CHRONIC/
E or skin contact can produce irritation or burnin of tissue. Ingestion can cause damage*to
1
tract. Excessive inhalation of mist or vapors can cause irritation of respiratory tract.
CARCINOGENICITY: NTP.- No /ARC MONOGRAPHS.- No OSHA REGULATED: No
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF EXPOSURE: See health hazards
MEDICAL CONDITIONS GENERALL Y A GGRA VA TED B EXPOSURE: None known.
. .........
kid
- - d - 6 > .:f•: <.:.:. !
dlkii
i-.-xaX4%V wy. 0.%
VWES-7701V
Kg'- � W. a' k' '� ' X ' }sal s3/ :�. L'or1S '''IL�II , :::::• On C .:4:a
i V0 M wa- � 0" "V"s
1 *S 11 - � P WK - 1 � T
.v.�:•S:�t�'•�.' r • •: • as r: •r • a• • � •ra•: •.. • •:C•iC•:O: •. }, � ::::•: •: •:. :• •.:: : :' •. � :•:•: :: • . .
'T' 7/
SECTION IV FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZ4RD DATA
FLASH POINT [Method Used]: Non-flammable
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use media suitable for surrounding area.
SPECIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES., Routine firefightin procedures ade
UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: No unusual Are and explosion hazard
19
TEL: Jan 15 '96 10:07 No . Uu P.00
HA2ARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: will not occur CONDITIONS TO AVOID: /None
SECTION YI PHYSIC 4L CHEMIC4L CHARA CTERISTICS
BOILING POINT: >212 SPECIFIC GRA W T Y. 1.08 typical
STABILITY: Stable CONDITIONS TO A VOID: None
INCOI YIPA TIBILI T Y Materials to avoid): Strong acids, strong oxidizing agen
HAZ4RDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS. None --�
VAPOR PRESSURE [mmHg),,* NIE
VAPOR DENSITY (Air = 11: N/E
SOLUBILITY IN WATER: Complete
APPEARANCE AND ODOR: Clear, blue liquid
MEL TING POINT. NIA
EVAPORATION RATE (Butyl acetate = 1) N/E
1 / pH = 11.5 typical
SECTION VII PREC4 UTIONS FOR S4FE HANDLING AND USE
STEPS TO BE TAKEN IF MATERIAL IS SPILLED OR RELEASED:
Contain spi /I. Mop, scoop, or vacuum up as much as possible for reuse of dfsposal. Flush remainder to
sewer with plenty of water.
WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD
In accordance with local, state and federal regulations.
PRECAUTIONS TO BETAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORAGE
Store in cool, dry place. Keep product covered.
0 THER PRECA UTIONS. - KEEP 0 UT OF REA CH OF CHILDREN.
SECTION /III CONTROL MEASURES
VENTILA TION Local Exhaust. Usually adequate SPEC /AL: NIA
MECHANICAL (General ): Satisfactory 0THER. NIA
PROTECTIVE GLOVES: Rubber or plastic
EYE PROTECTION: Safety glasses recommended
OTHER PROTECTIVE CLOTHING OR EQUIPMENT: Routine protective clothing and equipment adequate.
WORK HYGIENE PRACTICES. Normal safe housekeeping practices adequate.
HMISINFPA TYPE RA TINGS
H ea l thlBl u e: _ Mi 4 = evere
Flammability /Red: 0 1 = Slight
Reactivtty/Ye110 w. Q 2 = Modere to
Specific/White: 3 = Serious
e inlormat;on presented rn t e S S is believed to be eceurete. However, nothing contained in this information is to be token es s warranty
of any kind by GRACE PRODUCTS, INC. The usef should review eny reeommenda dons in the specific context of tho intended use to
determine whether they are appropriate.
20
Attachment 4
R Metro
oo•
District
�m
0
January 16, 1996
Tom Ekstrand
Maplewood Community Development
1830 County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Tom,
1902 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55164
(612) 777 -3665
fax (612) 777 -6307
The District has reviewed preliminary plans for a Holiday Station Store for the corner of McKnight
and Lower Afton Roads. The proposers of this project approached the District. specifically in
regards to the issue of on -site ponding. The District does not have a policy that would require on-
site ponding for this project.
A sedimentation pond on this site would have limited success in treating the runoff from the site.
The overall size of the parcel constrains the available space for ponding. An undersized pond
would result in little dead storage and would result in a pond that would need to be cleaned out
fairly often to maintain its sediment removal efficiency.
A major concern related to this site is that the pollutants in the runoff from gas stations (gas and oil)
are lighter than water which. means they will float on the surface of a pond and will not settle out of
the water. The way some engineers deal with this problems is they install skimmers or subsurface
drains to the pond. This allows the water to leave the pond, but keeps the gas and oil in the pond.
The problem with this type of pond is that it requires frequent removal of the gas and oil from the
surface of the pond. Also, when large storm events occur, the gas and oil is simply flushed
downstream resulting in a high concentration of pollutants in the runoff. The concentrated
pollutant load would then have a greater impact on downstream natural areas.
Please contact me at 777 -3665 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
/atrick onrad
District Technician
21
Attachment 5
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Holiday Store
LOCATION: SE Comer — McKnight and Lower Afton Roads
DATE: December 4, 1995
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Mark Nelson, of Holiday Companies, is proposing to build a 4,000- square -foot, one -story Holiday
store with fuel sales and a car wash. Refer to the maps on pages 12 and 17. There would be
two pump islands with one dispenser on each island. Two vehicles could fuel up at each island
at a time. Refer to the project description on page 18. (Since last September, the applicant
:revised the building design. Refer to the schematic drawing on page 39.
Request
Mr. Nelson is requesting the following:
1. A comprehensive plan change - from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial).
2 A rezoning from CO to BC. Refer to the statement on page 19.
3. A code change to allow two pump islands instead of only one. Refer to page 21.
4. A conditional use :permit (CUP) for a motor fuel station in a BC district. Refer to page 20.
Reasons for the Requests
1. Plan change and rezoning: The code does not allow a fuel station on CO -zoned land. The
applicant needs BC zoning.
2. Code change: The code does not allow more than one pump island. The applicant is
proposing two.
3. CUP: The code allows fuel stations on land zoned BC only by conditional use permit.
BACKGROUND
Holiday Store
September 19, 1994: The planning commission tabled this review until the developer presents a
property value study, submits a community design review board application and provides
information on the drive - through car wash noise.
March 14, 1995: The community design review board approved the site, landscaping
and architectural plans.
September 11, 1995: The city council tabled the public hearing for this request until December
11, 1995.
Adjacent Site — Proposed Parkview Townhouses
July 10, 1995: The city council denied a proposal for 116 townhouses on a 20 -acre site to the
southeast. Refer to page 15. This property is presently adjoined with the Holiday store site as
one tract of land.
Refer to the Past Actions on page 9 for additional background information.
DISCUSSION
Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Change
The current land use plan designation and zoning is CO (commercial office). The CO zone
allows offices and related commercial uses. The proposed zoning is BC (business commercial).
The BC zone includes a wide variety of commercial uses, ranging from offices to fast -food
restaurants and gas stations. As an alternative, the BC-M (business commercial modified) zone
would allow minor fuel stations, but does not allow car washes. Since the BC zone allows such a
variety of uses, the city should put a time limit on any zoning or land use change. If the Holiday
Station is not built, the city could rezone the property back to CO.
There are no specific findings for changing the land use plan. There are, however, certain
general development policies for commercial properties. Refer to page 28. This proposal meets
these,criteria. The four requirements for rezoning are on page 10. This proposal meets all but
part of the fourth requirement. This requirement states that "the proposed change would have no
negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and
facilities, such as public water, sewer, police and fire protection and schools." This proposal
would create more police calls than an office use. See the crime section below.
Code Change
The code defines minor fuel station as "a retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle
fuels which provides no more than one island with a maximum of two dispensers." The applicant
is proposing two small islands with each having one fuel dispenser. The intent of the ordinance
is to limit the number of vehicles that can fuel up at one time to four. Having two islands, each
with one dispenser, would meet the intent of the ordinance. Dispensers that can serve more
than two cars at one time are possible, but not probable. According to the Minnesota Service
Station Association, such dispensers make up only 2% of the market. The ordinance should
require that the dispensers be designed to fuel only two cars at one time (one car on each side).
Eliminating the one island requirement would not change the ordinance's intent., but would allow
more flexibility in site design. The ordinance also changes the definition of major fuel station,
since it is defined as a station having two or more islands.
Conditional Use Permit and Site Design
The proposed gas station would meet the requirements for a CUP. This use would generate
more traffic than an office, but, according to Bob Hamilton, a traffic engineer with the City of
St. Paul and Dan Solar, the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer, the station would not cause any
major problems or safety issues.
There is one change required in the site plan. The city code prohibits parking spaces within the
line of vision between self- service fuel dispensers and the attendant's window. The CUP
approval should state this as a requirement.
E
Open Space
One neighbor suggested that the city use this site as an extension of Battle Creek Regional Park.
Larry Holmberg, a supervisor with the Ramsey County Park Department, told me that the county
has no plans to buy this property.
The entire 25 acres owned by Mr. Johnson was on the city's open space acquisition list.
Mr. Johnson had previously told the city that he did not want to sell his land to Maplewood for
open space. He wanted to sell it for development.
Traffic
Some neighbors stated concerns about too much tragic at McKnight Road and - Lower Afton
Road. McKnight Road is four lanes and Lower Afton Road is two lanes with a paved shoulder.
There is a four -way stop at the intersection. The city has designated both these roads as major
arterials. Major arterials are designed for carrying high volumes of traffic to and from residential
neighborhoods.
.Bob Hamilton, of the City of St. Paul, said that the proposed Holiday station would increase
traffic, but would not cause any major problems or safety issues. He thought that the use was
appropriate for the corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. He said that McKnight Road
was well equipped to handle the traffic. He suggested that the .city require a traffic study to
determine levels of service and the need for signals. Mr. Hamilton thought that the setback of
the drives from the comer was acceptable.
Dan Solar, the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer, told me that the intersection does. not have any
significant traffic problems. Both McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road have adequate capacity
to handle the traffic from the Holiday station. The four -way stop sign is functioning well. As the
south end of Maplewood continues to develop, it is likely that the county will signalize this
intersection. Mr. Solar thought this might happen in about five years. He stated that the
driveway locations were acceptable for the Holiday station. He did not feel that a traffic study
was needed.
One of the neighbors stated that MTC busses had to be rerouted because of the traffic. The
MTC said they have done some route changes in that area, but the changes had nothing to do
with the traffic.
Other Stations
One of the neighbors wrote that "Within a two mile radius of our house, we have gas
station /convenience stores. We do not need another gas station." One of the people objecting
to the Holiday Station is an owner of the Shamrock Plaza. There is a SbperAmerica Station
there, The station has two dispensers on one island and a 24 -hour convenience store. The city
attorney advised me that the city cannot deny a change to the comprehensive plan or zoning
map because of the number of similar uses in the area. The courts have stated that cities
cannot make market judgments. Cities must base their decisions on land use criteria. The
market will determine how many and which gas stations the neighborhood will support.
3
Crime
One of the residents complained that the Holiday Station would create high volumes of transient
traffic and provide a hangout for youth gangs much like the SuperAmerica station across the
street at Shamrock Plaza. According to the St. Paul Police Department, in the last 12 months,
there were 38 police calls to Shamrock Plaza. Our research a year ago showed that there were
158 calls to the SuperAmerica Station between January, 1992 and September, 1994. Most of
the calls were some type of disorderly conduct, theft or traffic violations. The Holiday station may
have fewer calls because of the hours of operation. The SuperAmerica station is open 24 hours.
The city code would limit the Holiday station hours of operation to 6 a.m. to 11 p.m.
Ken Collins, the Maplewood Director of Public Safety, told me that there should not be a problem
of gangs hanging out. Most convenience store operators call the police if this happens. He said
that convenience stores are usually monitored by the police to avoid such problems. Mr. Collins
stated that a convenience store would probably generate more police calls than an office, but the
police calls would not affect the neighborhood. Most such calls are for theft, traffic violations or
people driving off without paying for gas. Such calls do not generally affect surrounding homes.
Drainage
The District 1 Council in St. Paul and an owner of the Shamrock Plaza were concerned about
drainage. I talked to Roger Puchreiter at the St. Paul engineering department. He was not
aware of any flooding or drainage problems. There is a storm sewer along the east side of
McKnight Road. The city does not allow surface drainage to the street. The developer will have
to drain the surface .water into catch basins and pipe the, water to the storm sewer. This should
improve the existing drainage. The water from the Holiday station site now drains onto McKnight
Road.
Property Value Impact and Car Wash Noise Potential
Last September, the planning commission noted these.two issues as specific concerns that they
required the applicant to address. The applicant submitted the studies addressing these
concerns.
Property Values
I have enclosed the findings from the applicant's property value impact analysis on pages 22 -24.
This study was prepared by Ruppert & Ruppert Associates, Inc., real estate appraisers. In
summary, the study finds - that there would not be any negative impact on the value of the five
homes to the south. Staff agrees with these findings listed on page 24.
In response to our survey of the neighbors, the property owner at 338 McKnight Road felt that the
Holiday station would decrease his property values. Richard Simmer, a commercial appraiser for
Ramsey County, said that a convenience center with gas would generally have a negative effect
on surrounding residential property values. In this case, however, the negative effect is mitigated
.by the existing LBC (limited business commercial) zoning to the north, the Shamrock Plaza
across McKnight Road and by McKnight Road itself. The nearest house would also be
separated from the proposed Holiday station by about 250 feet of wooded land. (The nearest
neighbor, at 228 McKnight Road, did not express any concern about the potential for a negative
impact on property values.)
4
Car Wash Noise
I have enclosed the applicant's car wash noise analysis on pages 25-27. This report concludes
in saying that the car wash must be equipped with a noise reduction package to stay below the
maximum noise limits set by the PCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency). It has been staffs
observation that the noise is also reduced when the car wash doors are closed while the car
wash . is in operation. The applicant should be required to have the car wash- doors set up to
always be closed when the car wash is running.
Options
1. Change the land use plan and zoning map to BC-M (business commercial modified). This
would allow the gas station, but not the car wash.
2. Approve the developer's requests.
3. Deny the developer's requests.
Conclusion
The decision in this case is whether a convenience store with gas sales and a car wash is better
for the city and the neighborhood than offices. The advantage of the proposed use is improved
service for area residents. The disadvantage over offices is more traffic and more police calls,
but, as stated earlier, these possibilities are not significant. I do not see strong reasons for
denying or approving these requests. The revised building design on page 38 is also more
attractive than the design submitted to the CDRB last March.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on page 33. This resolution changes the land use plan designation for
the southeast comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial once)
to BC (business commercial). This change is based on the following reasons:
I . It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's policies for commercial
development.
2. There would still be a transition zone between this site and the five single dwellings - to
the south.
3. There is similar commercial development across McKnight Road in St. Paul as the
proposed Holiday store.
If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall
reconsider this land use plan change.
B. Adopt the resolution on page 34. This resolution changes the zoning on the southeast
comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial office) to BC
(business commercial). This change is based on the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning
code.
5
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the
neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the
property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately
safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the
community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities,. such as public water, sewer,
police and fire protection and schools.
If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall
reconsider this rezoning.
C. Approve the code change on page 38. This change allows two fuel- dispenser islands for
minor fuel stations rather than one island. The number of fuel dispensers allowed shall not
change.
D. Adopt the resolution on pages 35 -37. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for
a fuel station and car wash on property zoned BC (business commercial) at the southeast
comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. This permit is based on the findings
..required by the code and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the city stamped July 31, 1995. The
director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized
within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The
council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The developer shall revise the site plan, for staff approval, omitting any parking spaces
between the attendant's window and the fuel islands (code requirement). The
applicant must still provide enough parking spaces to meet the code.
5. The developer shall submit a lighting plan for staff approval. Any lighting poles south
of the buildings and fuel island canopy shall aim away from the residential district to
the south. All lighting shall be screened or directed to comply with city code. Site
lights shall not exceed one -foot candle of intensity at a residential lot line (code
requirement).
6. The developer shall equip the car wash with a noise reduction package and keep the
southerly door closed while car washing and drying equipment is operating.
7. The fuel station and car wash shall not be open between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. (code
requirement).
8. External speakers shall not exceed the noise standards set by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (code requirement).
6
9. The developer shall not disturb the land or remove any trees between the grading
limits of this site and 328 McKnight Road.
10. The building official shall not issue a building permit for the proposed development until
the city approves a lot division creating this site and the applicant records the new
deed with Ramsey County. Conditions of this lot split shall include the following:
a. Dedication of three feet of additional right -of -way for the future widening of
McKnight Road.
b. Dedication of cross easements between the Holiday site and adjacent properties
because of the shared- access drives proposed.
11. The Holiday Stationstore shall not be allowed to store merchandise for sale outside of
• the building.
7
CITIZENS COMMENTS
We surveyed owners of the eight properties within 380 feet of this property. Of the six replies,
three were in favor and three objected.
In Favor
1. I .believe it will lead to further development in the surrounding area. (Midway National Bank,
Apple Valley)
2. It is a much needed development for south Maplewood. Refer to the further comments in
the letter on page 29. (Johnson, 2299 Londin Lane)
3. Refer to the letter on page 30. (Gerth, 2276 Londin Lane)
Opposed
1. a. McKnight and Lower Afton cannot handle anymore traffic than it already has. It is
dangerous enough trying to pull out of our driveway now. MTC busses had to be
rerouted because of the traffic.
b. Within a two mile radius of our house, we have gas station /convenience stores. We do
not need another gas station.
c. Development of this property will only decrease the value of my property.
Sell this property to the state as an addition to Battle Creek Park. (Palmer, 338
.McKnight Road)
2: It increases high volumes of transient traffic and provides a hangout for youth gangs much
like the SA station does today. Use this land for a store front plaza or office building for less
overall traffic (transient) than a gas /quick -stop grocery store does. (Ketch, 328 McKnight
Road)
3. Refer to the letter on page 31. (Anderson, Shamrock Plaza, St. Paul)
4. Refer to the letter on page 32. (District 1 Community Council)
8
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 1.25 acres
Existing land use: undeveloped
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Lower Afton Road and Battle Creek Park
South: undeveloped commercial property and single dwellings
West: McKnight Road and Shamrock Shopping Center in St. Paul
East: undeveloped commercial property
PAST ACTION
July 1, 1971: The city council granted a special use permit over the entire 25 -acre site. The
permit was for a 375 -unit apartment and town house development. This permit expired in 1972.
October 40, 1983: The city council rezoned the southeast comer of Lower Afton and McKnight
Roads from F (farm residence) to CO. The council also changed the land use plan from RM
(medium density residential) to LSC (limited service commercial) for this property. (LSC was the
previous- classification before the city began using zoning classifications last year.) The LSC
designation allowed minor motor fuel stations.
December 12, 1988: The council approved a CUP for a planned unit development (PUD). The
PUD was for the entire 25 acres owned by Mr. Johnson. The PUD included 152 rental town
houses, a 33,600- square -foot retail center and two gas dispensers on one island.
June 1, 1991: The CUP expired.
January 11, 1993: The city adopted a new comprehensive plan. As part of this plan, the city
changed the land use categories to match the zoning districts. As a result, the land use for the
Holiday site changed from LSC to CO.
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: CO
Zoning: CO
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36- 151(b)(9) requires a CUP for a minor motor fuel station and car wash in a BC district.
0
zone Change - Findings for Approval
Section 36 -485 of the zoning code requires that the city council make the following findings to
rezone property:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the neighboring
property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property
adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or, plan is adequately safeguarded.
q Y 9
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community,
where ..applicable, and the public welfare. ,
Y
4 The proposed change would have no negative effect upon, efficient,
the to ical, and
p g
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, .sewer, police
and fire protection and schools.
CUP — Findings for Approval
Section 36- 442(a) requires that the city council approve CUPs based on specific standards for
approval. Refer to the resolution on pages 35 -37.
OTHER AGENCIES
Ramsey Soil and Water Conversation District
Robert Johnson, of the soil conservation district, stated that care must be taken to protect nearby
wetland and the abutting streets from sedimentation. Care must also be taken to protect
groundwater from underground tanks.
10
p:sec12- 28\holiday6. mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Land Use Plan Map - EXisting
3. Land Use Plan Map -. Proposed
4. Property Line / Zoning Map - Existing
5. Property Line / Zoning Map - Proposed
6. Site Plan
7. Description of the Proposed Development
8. Rezoning Statement
9. Conditional Use Permit Statement
10. Code Amendment Letter
11. Property Value Impact Analysis
12. Car Wash Noise Analysis
13. Commercial and Industrial Development Policies
14. Letter from Arnold Johnson dated July 18, 1994
15. Letter from Gerhard Gerth dated July 19, 1994
16. Letter from Allen J. Anderson dated July 18, 1994
17. Letter from District 1 Community Council
18. Resolution Comprehensive Plan Change
19. Resolution - Zoning Map Change
20. Resolution Conditional Use Permit
21. Code Change
22. Revised Building Schematic
23. Plans date- stamped July 31, 1995 (separate attachment)
11
Attachment 1
a
f—
Z
Z
0
16
1. HUtMNGTON CT.
2. OAKRtDGE LA.
•
R ur n • A 0�
CREEK
Z MAYER LA.
G
JAMES W DR. o
p Ae U)
r 0 Z
f tEG W
UPPER AFTO RD.
..
.
'
.
'
•
•
o
f .
CR ECK
�
•,
GIO NA-
..
...
..,
. •
�.
'
39
LOWER
. . .
:
•
O
t
•"
'
RAWSEY COUNTY
• '
`. •
LONDIN LA.
CORREC77ONA,L
El FAC1L1TY
,Q
�,,
.. �0
to
••
�•'••
�
o
POND W
cr.•e�.�.
HtG �
of 39
:•
.• ,
•
Moot
� .� z
2 PO
N th' �• �
: •..
.. • .
.,
• ' '
'
`, w
o KING A
�
O'DAY '
<
.
•,
fj
.,.
ICU LAN D RD. <
C1R.
S o
.
'
TEAK 0
-- CRFSTVIEW
WOOD IL A�OD DR.
•. •
•.
o
'•
FOREST
ar OR.
O�AKRME DR.
'
•
,
•
W
_
HILLWOOD ei z
z
•.
•..
.. •.
••
`.
•
'
o SO
. . o
•
P
cc
0
, ...
•
o UNWOOD
A VE.
;'•.
..
,! O CT
r
cc
0
•
,V � J
CAE
LOCATION MAP
12
Q
N
I EXISTING
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN
P LANNING AREA NUMBER 11
4
N
13
r m
to
o r f � 010
-9 as
flow •
minor collector
11 IL
m ■ �r s - .J
■NE
inor
— -� -
'
® col
41#11
aw Lu
••• f
�.ri1�A� rir�
i!! i t 1 �' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1:� 1 1!! I I# /# t# f # ##
i t f# i 1 f #/ f e 1
■
I EXISTING
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN
P LANNING AREA NUMBER 11
4
N
13
PROPOSED
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN
PLANNING AREA NUMBER 11
4
N
14
r�
■/
-
®�� •�, ® i:l
°
R-1 • o r ► `,. ;1
minor collector IN IP
- - -- - r swim --
M �.
;•a ■■ ■
°
�nnv�■
�
� mino
I
®
co
`
•
_ -J
• e•
! 1!!
1 1 1 1
.n
PROPOSED
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN
PLANNING AREA NUMBER 11
4
N
14
Attachment 4
_ 2 6 3Z•�
Q m
l
TdT�, L
FOR PARK
PRUP� SED HOLIDAY RESERVED
7 9 t ac. }
STO RE SITE o30
LOWER AFTON ROAD ,0
411 t 7 45
-* ..............
............
.00 i ♦�
k r
- 4 �� " I� r V = I
WOODED
......... C 0
LOW LAND
■■■■■■ ■■ 24.8 7 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■--
■ � � 1.ss
N �
■ a 5MT
PARKVIEW TOWNHOUS SITE
i. 318
330. .P7
n 338 4
Geo C oE C"f 5
RT ME
34fi APA C
N
.- G pNN E
• 4 so Q1
A., N �a N
3 5g C4 4. 10 46. 4 5' -- -
46 40'
366
a .33
,r+
Q '^ ° z ( N �" 1
F- a
44
z o 3 70-384
YO
N
24 O' (2
Iff
s. q t v LI p.416 3 33 ' `-'ZZS _' a 2�D.82
i �ml i70RM
L. (2 � O
a , `� 1 few FR
3 Co e
N
__ OUT LOT A
i S M r •
Zq• 7
Q D
P o
1C.KNI & 7"owN HOMES
Co -op
- VTILtTr( -- �i
E3tA - T- 1 - ��.04
1�
o o' V
4
0 R
13 TWRV tO2)
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP n
EXISTING ZONING
SITE OF PROPOSED HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE
15
Attachment 6
263E. Onomme
4MD TbTq L IS - BZ4c.
' ROPOSED HOLIDAY RESERVED FOR
, .
STOR SITE � 9 � )
zb°
f LOWER AFTON ROAD
IN I
CL
�M
Z
,,
V!
l o t
ac
i . z
t
C3 0
M o
e
PROPOSED ZONING
SITE OF PROPOSED HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE
:...• ' WOOD \
. .... .... NMA
LOW LA
24.57
�.
t11� Q
PARKVIEW TOWNHOUSE SITE
(2)
v
O C2
• a Gil
3
PAR
A
oso
Pa
$r) (6)
8x.93 X24.1` 10(9
in
ME 6os.2 1 1 loof I I .r zo . ..
4
N
16
�1
G (3�
G q,.C.. ('2
$To IL"
I s n T
�4
3
�- -
- - - -- - -- - --
,
-
ZSW*4s 1
OUT'L(
.016
; . -2 S G
1 t 7x11 Z `�
� t , �
P
iC.K NIA•M T Towrv
Co -op
-------- -
- - - --
PROPOSED ZONING
SITE OF PROPOSED HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE
:...• ' WOOD \
. .... .... NMA
LOW LA
24.57
�.
t11� Q
PARKVIEW TOWNHOUSE SITE
(2)
v
O C2
• a Gil
3
PAR
A
oso
Pa
$r) (6)
8x.93 X24.1` 10(9
in
ME 6os.2 1 1 loof I I .r zo . ..
4
N
16
Attachment 6.
vw
�� O // i ;1 ,� L.� .�. „J •-- � TORE � s- r �
th
.__ 1
4 r, UP
1 MItI► N�•R A'1T� /
1 . • ar•�. • " Mr. . • ��' • • �/
t `
�1
1 ' �NIM� idlr
1 t
' 1
t
1 '
8
,
° r
SITE PLAN Q
17 N
LONER AFTON
ROAD
1 �
•
Wow
.w
,
Lwow&
Is
I
—j
a&—
0 4mww 0 0 4001�
ft-4
• I�.J
�'
b � t � , • �
..
� Mtn► •+wr le��
oho
low
.r
ivi
1
'
;';'•
X14.
•�
• . �
�
ICJ
f�L
1
•
vw
�� O // i ;1 ,� L.� .�. „J •-- � TORE � s- r �
th
.__ 1
4 r, UP
1 MItI► N�•R A'1T� /
1 . • ar•�. • " Mr. . • ��' • • �/
t `
�1
1 ' �NIM� idlr
1 t
' 1
t
1 '
8
,
° r
SITE PLAN Q
17 N
Attachment 7
Description of Proposed Development
Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road
Maplewood, Minnesota.
Holiday Stationstores, Inc. proposes development of a neighborhood convenience
store /superette with gasoline for the southeast corner of McKnight. Road and Lower Afton
Road to serve the convenience needs of the surrounding area. The property is a large
1.25 acre parcel. fronted by McKnight Road to the west, Lower Afton Road to the north
and Vacant, Commercial Office District property to the south and east.
Holiday's proposal includes an approximately 4,000 square foot convenience store
building, two gasoline islands with an overhead canopy, and a car wash. The project is
oriented to McKnight Road to serve the convenience needs of the surrounding area.
The proposal includes a small area of the convenience store building dedicated to a
brand name food sales area, to be operated by Holiday. This large site is able to
efficiently accommodate a drive -thru window for this brand name food area in
conjunction with the traffic flow patterns for the proposed car wash. Drive -thru and car
wash customers will exit toward Lower Afton Road.
At a minimum, the proposal meets the zoning and development criteria. In all areas
possible, this proposal provides greater setbacks, parking spaces, and landscaped areas
than required in the zoning ordinance.
Holiday is excited at the prospect of becoming part of the Maplewood community. We
look forward to providing a quality facility and operation to meet the convenience needs
of the area.
MWN /jw5
18
Attachment 8
Rezoning Statement
Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road
Maplewood, Minnesota
Holiday Stationstores, Inc.. proposes development of a neighborhood convenience
store /su erette with asoline for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton
p 9
Road to serve they Convenience needs of the surrounding area. The property is zoned
CO- Commercial Office District. A convenience.store /superette with gasoline requires a
BC- Business Commercial District zoning. Therefore, Holiday Stationstores, Inc. requests
a zoning change a from CO to BC for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower
Afton Road.
The proposed Holiday convenience store / superette with gasoline ( "Holiday store ") will
hel p g serve the existing convenience needs of the area. This development will cater to
existing traffic and is not intended to "draw" customers from outside the surrounding area
of the site. The site layout promotes safe, eff cient on- and off -site circulation and traffic
patterns. The proposed Holiday store will provide the most advanced safety systems
p p p Y p
available. Lighting will promote a safe environment, but will not adversely affect
adjoining property. p g oinin Landsca in and green space is .proposed to minimize any impacts
the development may have on the immediate area and architectural features will be used
to avoid a "commercial look" to the development. The density of the proposed
will be less than what could be developed under the CO- Commercial Office
development p
District. The ualit of the proposed development should positively impact value in the
q Y p ro p
area.
Neighboring property to west is developed commercially, property to the northwest
is high density residential, Property to the north is park land /open space, and property
9 tY
to the south /southeast is vacant. Surrounding property, for the most part, is already in
use and this 1.
ro osed project will not detract from that use. Architecturally, the
p p p
proposed Holiday store will be designed to fit the character of.the neighborhood.
The ro erty proposed for rezoning enjoys all public services (immediately accessible)
p p ..
and will not create a demand on such services beyond existing capacities.
Overall, a zoning change for this property will allow the addition of a high - quality, state -
of- the -art convenience facility to meet the needs of the neighborhood.
MWNrw:doc4
19
Attachment 9
Conditional Use Statement
Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road
Maplewood., Minnesota
Holiday Stationstores, Inc. proposes development of a neighborhood convenience
store /superette with gasoline for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton
Road to serve the convenience needs of the surrounding area. The property is a large
1.25 acre parcel fronted by McKnight Road on the west, Lower Afton Road to the north
and vacant, Commercial Office District property to the south and east.
The proposed Holiday convenience store /superette with gasoline ( "Holiday store ") will,
at a minimum, meet the zoning and development criteria for the City of Maplewood. in
all areas possible, this proposal provides greater setbacks, p arking spaces and
landscaped areas than required in the zoning ordinance. Holiday's proposal will not
substantially alter the commercial and retail character planned for the surroundin g area.
The high quality of the proposed development should positively impact value in the area.
The proposed use is not excessive for this site and should not promote any nuisances
in the area. The Holiday store will cater to existing traffic and is not intended to "draw"
.customers form outside the surrounding area of the site. The site Layout promotes safe
and efficient on- and off -site circulation and traffic patterns. The property enjoys all
public services. (immediately accessible) and will not create a demand on such services
beyond existing capacities. This development will use the highest quality materials and
design features, and will employ the most advanced technology and safety systems
available.
Holiday looks forward to becoming a past of the Maplewood community and providing
a quality facility and operation to meet the convenience needs of the area.
MWN /jw6
20
Attachment 10
Holiday Companies
GE's. OFFICE: 456' WEST 80th STREET / MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1224 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 / PH. 612 - 830 -8 / FAX b12- 830 -8864
CREDIT OFFICE: 5501 W*. OLD SHAKOPEE RD. / MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1216 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 / PH. 612- 921 -5200 / FAX b12- 921 -5295
July 28, 1994
Mr. Tom Ekstrand
City f Maplewood JJL
ty p
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE Zoning Code Amendment for Holiday Stationstores, Inc.
Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road
Dear Mr. Ekstrand:
As we have discussed during the past several weeks, Holiday's development proposal,
for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road, includes one
gasoline dispenser on two separate dispenser islands. This design promotes safer and
more efficient traffic circulation than two dispensers on one dispenser island, and still
meets the intent of the code with a fueling capacity for only four vehicles at one time.
We are trying to meet the intent of the Zoning Code by limiting fueling capacity. We
simply wish to design the site in a manner to most effectively serve our customers. We
ask for a Code Amendment to specifically allow two separate dispenser islands, as our
plan depicts. We will still .have only the two gasoline dispensers as required by the
Zoning Code.
Please incorporate this request as part of our application. Call me directly at 830 -8767
if you have any questions, or if you wish to schedule a meeting to further discuss our
proposal. Thank you for your continued assistance.
Sincerely,
HOLIDAY STATIONSTORFS, INC.
Mark W. Nelson, Manager
Real Estate
MWN:jw9
Foo s}
WKICY
21
Attachment 11
HOLIDAY COMPANIES
July 19, 1995
� Page 5 of 7
PROPOSED STORE
The concern is that the market value of the five existing single family homes to the south will
be negatively impacted by construction of the proposed Holiday Store.
The addresses of the five homes in question and their 1994 assessed values, building age and
foundation size are as follows:
• ....) :.., ro ...:.' ,.. r,n;t• ,., . �. _ +.^'x. .. .>�: a:.: .. .w ...:.:
'a w� ♦ h t � > r br /Yi.. a `. w� -.+r _ . c
ADDRESS..:
.. •.. a ::
�•�•
S S :ED. y
3UI ?Il
'.�.Lte:c�i'r f
!yt,4 +.
....: `OU
S �
/ T
... . •.. .. .. :... • ... Y .i X u:... ..:. .. ...) f .. .,H ...... w�,r ,�
:.. .�.; ...:/ K.. > v. t. :r ..f. .. :.� r'C:� "�.i i'v)+ltv,.t rA.wi�"�C: •..':A.iY)Jt">rfN .•4?•. :f•- � ".
v.: :3.. xC9Kr
.. :� ... � :... :., . ,. , : >.;...; ..:, y;:.m.',>. � �:..• <µ ;3.x
• ..�r.syr , ,.. �8,�!.. .:n:.ro
M ►.
39S :,.,/
.0 >.. •. yn.. >
: r,
� t
..
Y
:4... - rG:' - S.: SrC >3t Y :..
Al
<i:3. .iR.A %.b5�.: h
a '�°' V �x..
> it <. ),a'
t. zF `�
.ATION
)... ... . i-
�4n. .K .O'...
x < 6.r�. ).�
< >•
328 McKnight Road
$81
1977
982 square feet
338 McKnight Road
$80,
1977
1,040 square feet
346. McKnight Road
.$90
1977
1,660 square feet
358 McKnight Road
$83,100
1977
1,040 square feet
2271 Londin Lane
$74,800
1955
936 square feet
This information was obtained from Ramsey County.
The home fronting on Londin Lane faces away from the proposed Holiday station site and would
in no way be affected by the proposed store. The remaining four homes all front on McKnight
Road (facing west) which is a heavily traveled roadway (8,500 cars per day) and are located near
an existing neighborhood commercial strip center (Shamrock Plaza).
22
4
HOLIDAY COMPANIES
July 19, 1995
� Page 6 of 7
I I' t IZ1141 O 1
Implicit in the definition of market value is the assumption that the buyer is acting prudently and
knowledgeably. A prudent and knowledgeable buyer of any of the five homes located south of
the proposed Holiday store would inquire as to the development possibilities of the Arnold E.
Johnson site.
The potential buyer would become aware of the previously proposed developments and the
current proposed developments (Parkview). A potential buyer would also inquire about the
zoning and potential uses of the adjacent property. In short, a prudent and knowledgeable buyer
would fully expect that the Arnold E. Johnson property will be developed as amixed -use
development in the near future and would take into consideration this fact when making an offer
to purchase one of the five homes to the south.
The above is true regazdless of whether or not a Holiday tore is �ronosed or conctrnc+Pd on a
pi.Qn of this site.
The existing CO zoning allows for .a wide variety of office and related commercial uses such as
restaurants and retail sales.
IN OUR OPIlvION, THE PROPOSED HOLIDAY STORE WILL HAVE NO MORE OR
ESS O F AN I P N THE H E SOUTH 1HAN AN F E
DEVE LOPMENT D
HICH S A IT - UNDER
SHE CURRENT ZONING.
The proposed Holiday store site IS NOT - VISIBLE from any of the residences to the south. The
topography and vacant commercial site to the north (which is heavily wooded) prevent any direct
view of the proposed Holiday store site. From the southern property line of the proposed
Holiday store site to the northern property line of the northernmost home (328 McKnight Road),
is approximately 270 lineal feet. This distance combined with the upward sloping topography
der mitigate any potential negative impact.
Even if the vacant commercial tract in between the proposed Holiday store site and the single
family homes was not heavily wooded, visibility of the proposed Holiday store site would be
poor. The upward sloping topography would result in the single family homes "looking over"
the Holiday store.
Finally, the vacant commercial site between the proposed Holiday store site and the single family
homes to the south serves as a "buffer" between the two uses. This site is zoned LBC with
permitted uses including office, clinics and daycare. This is a "lighter" Zoning than either CO or
BC and would provide an adequate "buffer" or "step down" between the two uses.
1. 23
HOLIDAY COMPANIES
July 19, 1995
Page 7 of 7
It is our considered opinion that construction of the proposed Holiday store at the southeast
corner of McKnight and Lower Afton Road AQULD A TIVELY AFF ECT the five
single family homes to the south. The reasons for this opinion are summarized as follows:
1. The home fronting on Londin Lane faces :away from the proposed Holiday station
site. The four homes fronting on McKnight Road (facing west) are located on a
heavily traveled roadway near an existing neighborhood commercial strip center.
2. A potential purchaser of any of these homes would have had knowledge of the
development potential of the Arnold E. Johnson property.
3. The proposed Holiday Store would have NO MORE OR LESS IMPACT on the
homes to the south than an office development with related uses, which is a permitted
use under the current zoning.
4. The proposed Holiday Store site is VIRTUALLY NOT VISIBLE from any of the
five homes to the south given the distance, topography and wooded area.
5. The vacant parcel between the proposed Holiday store site and the five single family.
homes to the south SERVES AS A BUFEER between the two uses.
We hope this information has been helpful. If you have any questions or comments, please do
not hesitate to contact us.
RUPPERT & RUPPERT ASSOCIATES, INC.
By:
appon;-rrebwent
er License 4000850
1 1". SJR/jah
I r...
1tr2602.wpd
1'
24
Appraiser License 4000851
Attachment 12
Huntm4qon
PROJECT NUMBER; 4140 95 -1347 PAGE: 2
DATE: Mash 21,1995
*Revised: July 25, 1995
INTRODUCTION:
This report presents the results of a plan review and acoustical opinion of a proposed Holiday
Stationstore and associated car wash to be located in Maplewood, Minnesota. This work was requested
by Mr. Scott Alpaugh of Holiday Companies on February 14, 1995 with the analysis conducted on
March 17 and 20, 19959
ANALYSIS SUMMARY & OPI1vION:
The following is based on a plan review of the proposed site and sound pressure data obtained on a
similar configuration measured in South Gate, California. The estimated dBA sound pressure levels at
the nearest residence straight south of the .car wash entrance is 53 dB without the noise reduction and
48 dB with the noise reduction package. Sound pressure levels at the nearest residence to the SE of the
car wash entrance is 50 dB without the noise reduction and 45 dB with the noise reduction package.
MPCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) noise standards state the L, and L values for an NAG1
(Noise Area Classification - Residential) cannot exceed 65 and 60 dB respectfully during the daytime hours
of 7 am to 10 pm. Conversely, the L, and L values cannot exceed 55 and 50 dB during the nighttime
hours of 10 pm to 7 am.
NOTE: Lio and Lso are levels exceeded 10 and 50 % of the time.
SUMMATION:
If the car wash is operated du rin daytime hours o. niv and with the noise reduction , aacck age, no
noise violation is anticipated. There is the potential for a n, oise violation if the car wash is operated
after to pm and without the noise reduction pack e.
*Note: The proposed hours of operation will be from 6AM -11PM. It is further proposed that
the noise reduction package will be utilized.
BACK `ROUND INFORMATION,
A plat was furnished of the proposed Parkview Development which will be located in the SE corner of
McKnight and Lower Afton Road, Maplewood, Minnesota. In addition, sound level data was furnished
by Nationwide Wash Systems, Inc. This data consisted of a series of tables listing octave band and 1/3
octave band sound pressure levels as well as dBA and dB Linear values (these latter levels were
essentially identical). See attached tables.
The data listed two sets of values which applied to a Thrust Pro Dryer with and without a Noise
Reduction package. A 5 dB reduction was realized with the NR package installed.
Distance measurements were obtained from the car wash entrance to the nearest residence located to the
AS A MUTUAL. PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL HUNTINGDON ENGINEERING 81 ENVIRONMENTAL INC REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF
CLIENTS. AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL.
CIO A member of the HIH group of companies
25
HtmtM4 don
PROJECT NUIVM ERs 4140 95 -1347 PAGE: 3 4
DATE: March 21 1 1995
*Revised: July 25, 1995
south and southeast (350 and 325' respectively). Using the sound level data provided and the Inverse
Square Law suppositions, anticipated noise levels were calculated. No provisions were applied relative
to the wind or atmospheric conditions..
No residences were indicated to the north or west of the car wash *within 350 feet
TABLE 1
Octave Band Noise Levels (Decibels)
For Car Wash Dryer (Thrust Pro)
With and Without Noise Reduction Package (NRP)
Hertz
Drver with NRP
er without NRP
31.5
63
125
250
500
1000
2000
4000
8000
16,000
dBA
dBC
Linear
37
53
61
72.5
73.3
72
72.5
67.6
56
42.9
80
87
79.7
38
49.5
55
61
70
69.5
73.3
68.2
61.8
49.9
84.3
89.3
84.5
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL HUNTINGDON ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL INC REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF
CLIENTS, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL.
Ca A member of the HIH group of companies
26
PROJECT NUMBER: 4140 95 -1347
TABLE 2
Huff1t
PAGE: 4
DATE: Mash 21,1995
*Revised: July 25, 1995
One -Third Octave Band. Noise Levels (Decibels)
For Car. Wash Dryer (Thrust Pro)
With and Without Noise Reduction Package (NRP)
Hertz Drver with NRP Drver without NRP
20
23
30
25
19.5
29.5
31.5
27
28.8
40
32
33.5
50
38.2
38.5
63
44.5
47
80
52.2
51.8
100
53.6
54.7
125
55
56.5
160.
57.5
57.8
200
63.5
60.9
250
65
66
315
75
78
400
71
78
500
65.2
69.2
630
67.1
70.5
800
67.3
72.8
1000
68
72
1250
66.2
72.2
1600
63.6
71
2000
67.5
70.8
2500
70
70.5
3150
65.5
69.2
4000
60.5
63.7
5000
58
60.5
6300
53.3
59.1
8000
50.5
53
10
47
49.4
12,500
46.1
43.1
16,000
36
37.2
20
32
2902
gs \shared\mmfiles\rk \95 -1347
I . I
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL HUNTINGDON ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL INC REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF
CLIENTS, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS PROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL.
t� A member of the HIH group of companies
27
Attachment 13
COMWRCLAL AND MUSTRLAL DEVELOPUFNT
POLICIES
The following are the City's commercial and industrial development
policies: .
• Group compatible businesses in suitable areas.
• Provide attractive surroundings in which to shop and work.
• Require adequate off-street loadeng facilities.
r promote the joint use of parking areas, drives and trash
containers.
�
Avoid disruption of .adjacent residential areas.
• Use planned unit developments (PUDs) wherever practical.
Maintain orderly transitions between commercial and residential
areas.
• Require commercial and Industrial developers to make all
necessary improvements to ensure compatibility with
surrounding residential uses.
• Require adequate screening or buffering of new or expanded
commercial areas from any adjacent existing or . planned
residential development.
• Restrict commercial development which will result in traffic
volumes which are beyond the capacity of the road systems or
generate excessive noise or pollution as defined by state
standards.
• Plan land uses and streets to mute nonresidential traffic around
residential neighborhoods.
N't
Attachment 14
If
6PZox .00u� .t.� -z` Zo4 C . o4, , o 4 '
t max, z�z.0
ol 6
ot-ooe
.e� .0
ooze 1
oo�
Attachment 15
Cor:munity Development Department
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Dear Sirs:
We need more convenient! shopping in this area and Holiday, 'With its
.diverse merchandise will provide" for this.
The Shamrock Center lonated in city o f. St. Paul is beginning to
ha a run =down a This added competition will help the
neighborhood
The town of Ma R ltvood:_could.- benefit from the added tax base.
The overall development of the John$on property is well thought out
and be an asse t to Maplewood.
v an additional four g uirps would be more appropriate.
I belie g R
The Sup er A n. erica rtore on the op posite corner has only four pumps
and there are always cars waiting.
Note I � r S 0 try n ot sent a cop of the opinion survey as my home is
located on Londin Lane- -not in the imxediatr area of the purposed
Holida y Station Stare, I drive by this corner every day and I would
appreciate this new addition to the neighborhood.
Sincerely
of
Gerhard Gerth
30
1
A. J. ANDERSON & CO., LTD.
CERTIFIED - PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
93 W. LITTLE CANADA ROAD, SUITE 104
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 J u l. .,
Phone: (612) 490.9190 u
July 18, 1994
Mr. Kenneth Roberts, Association Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 Last County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: Proposed Holiday Gas Station, Car Wash, and Convenience Store
at McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road
Dear Mr, Roberts:
We are strongly opposed to rezoning this area for the
following reasons:
1.) We know that cutting down the hill along McKnight
Road will permit. a flood to occur at Shamrock Plaza
Shopping Center. We were nearly flooded out several
years ago when a very heavy rain storm occurred!
An elimination of the hill and a large blacktopped
area will permit the water to wash down on us. we
believe this will permit very serious damage to us.
2.) A Super America gas station and convenience store
already exists at our shopping center which
adequately serves the convenience needs of the
neighborhood.
3.) A car wash will draw people from other neighborhoods
and will create further congestion and traffic
problems at the intersection of McKnight Road and
Lower Afton Road. Who will pay for signal lights
and required widening of the roads?
We recommend that the zoning remain the same and that the hill
not be removed and that the property be used for residential. We
have served notice to Ramsey County and City of Saint Paul
regarding the potential flood problem to us that would be created
by this proposed rezoning.
Very truly yours,
Aw f dw�
Allen J. Anderson
General Partner
Shamrock Plaza Partnership
31
Attachment 17
District lCommunifty Council District, 1, News.
Conway Recreation Center • 2090 Conway St. •Room 126 • SL Paul, MN 55119 (612) 292 -7828
The Maplewood Planning Commission J
c/o Mr. Geoff Olson
Director of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
September 6,1994
Re: Rezonin g g , Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road
Dear Geoff:
Thank you very much for taking the time to meet with the District 1 Hearing Committee. It
was very helpful and informative to have you there and the committee certainly appreciated
your time.
As mentioned at the meeting the committee and other members of the community had some
concerns about the proposed rezoning, including the following:
1. The impact of increased traffic and potential need for signals at the intersection.
2. The location of curb cuts and impact of traffic flow in and out of the proposed
station on McKnight and Lower Afton Road.
3. Effect of Additional run off on storm sewer capacity.
4. The environmental impact of cutting down and grading the site and effect on the
pond to the East.
5. The intensity of the rezoning from CO to BC, the highest intensity business zone. Is
this zoning appropriate for this location? Would the site be returned to CO if
this project is not carried out?
Geoff, thank you again for your time. If it would be alright I would like to attend the
Planning Commission Meeting. May I have you send a copy of the agenda? (My fax number
is 292- 7829.) I look forward to working with you on this and future projects..
Best r garclk,
je fe hen
Co 'ty Organizer
CC: Ms. Gaxneth Peterson, Planner PED
Ms. Toni Baker, Ramsey County Commission
32
Attachment 18
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mark W. Nelson of Holiday Companies, applied for a change to the city's land
use plan from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the 1.25 acre tract at the southeast corner of McKnight
Road and Lower Afton Road.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. The planning commission held a public hearing on , 199_. City
staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners as required by law. The planning commission gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The
planning commission recommended that the city council the plan
amendment.
2. The city council discussed the plan amendment on , 199_. They
considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
change for the following reasons:
1. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's policies for commercial
development.
2. There would still be a transition zone between this site and the five single
dwellings to the south.
3. There is similar commercial development across McKnight Road in St. Paul as
the proposed Holiday Store.
Adopted on , 1995
33
Attachment 19
REZONING RESOLUTION
Whereas, Mark W. Nelson of Holiday Companies, applied for a rezoning from CO
(commercial office) to BC (business commercial).
Whereas, this rezoning applies to a 1.25 acre tract at the southeast corner of McKnight
Road and Lower Afton Road. The Legal description is:
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28,
.Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the West line of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest
Quarter and the South Fine of the North 362.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest
Quarter; thence Easterly, along said south line 40.01 feet to its intersection with a line
parallel with and distant 40.00 feet East of said West Fine and. the actual point of beginning;
thence continue Easterly, along said south line, 245.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with
said West line, 100.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 20.00 feet;
.thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 125.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with
said South Fine, 125.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 20.00 feet;
thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 100.00 feet to said line 40.00 feet East of
said West line; thence Northerly, along said parallel line to" the actual point of beginning.
Subject to easements, if any.
Whereas, the history of this rezoning is as follows:
1.
The planning commission reviewed this rezoning on
recommended that the city council the rezoning.
They
2. The city council held a public hearing on . The city staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners
as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak
and present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
rezoning for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning
code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the
neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the
property adjacent to the area included -in the proposed change or plan is adequately
safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the
community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer,
police and fire protection and schools.
Adopted on 1 1995.
34
Attachment 20
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mark W. Nelson of Holiday Companies, applied for a conditional use permit to
operate a fuel station and car wash on property zoned BC (business commercial).
WHEREAS, this permit applies to a 1.25 -acre site at the southeast corner of McKnight Road
and Lower Afton Road. The legal description is:
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28,
Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the West line of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest
Quarter and the South line of the North 362.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest
Quarter; thence Easterly, along said south line 40.01 feet to its intersection with a line
parallel with and distant 40.00 feet East of said West line and the actual. point of beginning;
thence continue Easterly, along said south Line, 245.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with
said West line, 100.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 20.00 feet;
thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 125.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with
said South line, 125.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 20.00 feet;
thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 100.00 feet to said line 40.00 feet East of
said West Fine; thence Northerly, along said parallel line to the actual point of beginning.
Subject to easements, if any.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On , 1995, the planning commission recommended that the city council
this permit.
2. The city council held a public hearing on , 1995. The city staff
published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as
required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and
present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
conditional use permit, because:
1, The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
35
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities :and services, .including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall. follow the site plan that the city stamped July 31, 1995. The
director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized
within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and. void. The
council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The developer shall revise the site plan, for staff approval, omitting any parking spaces
between the attendant's window and the fuel islands (code requirement). The
applicant must still provide enough parking spaces to meet the code.
5. The developer shall submit a lighting plan for staff approval. Any lighting poles south
of the buildings and fuel island canopy shall aim away from the residential district to
the south. All lighting shall be screened or directed to comply with city code. Site
lights shall not exceed one -foot candle of intensity at a residential lot line (code
requirement).
6. The developer shall equip the car wash with a noise reduction package and keep the
southerly door closed while car washing and drying equipment is operating.
7. The fuel station and car wash shall not be open between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. (code
requirement).
8. External speakers shall not exceed the noise standards set by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (code requirement).
9. The developer shall not disturb the land or remove any trees between the grading
limits of this site and 328 McKnight Road.
10. The building official shall not issue a building permit for the proposed development until
the city approves a lot division creating this site and the applicant records the new
deed with Ramsey County. Conditions of this lot split shall include the following:
a. Dedication of three feet of additional right -of -way for the future widening of
McKnight Road.
36
b. Dedication of cross easement& between the Holiday site and adjacent properties
because of the shared - access drives proposed.
11. The Holiday Stationstore shall not be allowed to store merchandise for sale outside of
the building.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 1996.
37
Attachment 21
ORDINANCE NO. .
AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING TWO FUEL - DISPENSER ISLANDS
FOR MINOR MOTOR FUEL STATIONS
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
Section 1. This section changes Section 36 -6 as follows: (I have crossed out the deletions.)
Section 36-6, Definitions.
Minor Motor Fuel Station: A retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle fuels
4VAiGleS AO FROM th she a Inv with a maximum of two (2) dispensers. Fuel, dispensers s_
be designed to serve only two cars at one time.
Major Motor Fuel Station: A retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle fuels which
provide more than two (2) dispensers
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper.
The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 1 1995.
W
4
10
F App
OF/
P PI
. v r
NN
dftU
-, °!Y '00
I 0
A "
4
•� 3ii }6 wa,. u , '� a ..arw -. `� ` � �`.. �
p
- 1 .. "' _�' �I� �� �� ws s �sr war ®a�� w�� �� NIL
WMMMM 4=j
b
A mow
Woo, ddkk
Ito
ol
mod
V
OW I I!t*AA
loon _ vo
mr
tiff?
W 6
VIM AN
-mom
7'
�jj •.ter ` - _ _ 1� ��.•,�`�►► ..+�� � ��rr �r :�'°�� �� ,�,,.- .,.dry
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 08 -21 -95
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. 7 P.M. Holiday Store (Lower Afton and McKnight Roads) —Land Use Plan Change, Zoning Map
Change and Code Change
Ken Roberts, associate planner, read the public hearing notice and presented the staff report.
Gerald Frisch of St. Paul, attorney for Holiday Store, was present and spoke about the proposed
Operation. Mark Nelson, manager of real estate for Holiday Companies, showed the plan that
was originally presented last September and then described changes that have been made to it.
Mr. Nelson said they are moving everything away from the southern residents (and proposed
southeast residents), adding 20 feet to lower Afton Road, increasing the green space along
McKnight Road, shortening the building, increasing the setback for the carwash and placing the
carwash and gas islands as far to the north as possible. Mr. Nelson also said Holiday's intent was
to serve the existing traffic. Mr. Nelson then answered questions from the commission.
Acting Chairperson Fischer then asked for comments from the public. Lloyd Peterson, a member
of the St. Paul District 1 Community Council, said their concern was about the amount of traffic
and asked if there was any intent to widen these roads, especially because of the number of
school busses using these routes. Ken Haider, Maplewood city engineer, said he was not aware
of any plan to widen these roads. Dennis Palmer, 338 McKnight Road South, requested that a
more- current traffic study of the area be considered and that the police have greater control of
speeding along McKnight Road. Mr. Palmer also commented on the number of gas stations,
carwashes, and fast food places within a two -mile radius of this area Jerry Johnson of 2445
Londin Lane, representing the Connemara II Association, expressed concern over traffic speeds
and the number of youths that linger around this commercial area.
Dennis Palmer challenged the statement that there is an average of one police call per week at
Shamrock Center. Mr. Palmer said they have a statement from a realtor. that shows if Holiday is
allowed to build, their property value will decrease. Jerry Hickey, 2455 Londin Lane, agreed with
the comments made by the two previous speakers and asked to have this item tabled until after
the open space discussion with Mr. Johnson has been resolved. He felt this area, as it now
exists, fits in with the open space of Battle Creek Park. Emil Sturzenegger, 2455 Londin Lane,
spoke about the traffic in the area and thought the land use designation should remain BC
(business commercial). Ron Hamre, 2445 Londin Lane, was also concerned with the same
issues as the previous speakers.
Alan Anderson, general partner in Shamrock Plaza Shopping Center, said they have put up a
fence in an attempt to control foot traffic at the center. He also mentioned the possibility of ice
problems on the hill from wet cars leaving the carwash in the winter. Mr. Anderson spoke of
drainage concerns and groundwater contamination in the area. Richard Peterson, 2445 Londin
Lane, also talked of crime and traffic in the area. Virginia Peterson, 2445 Londin Lane, read a
copy of a letter she previously sent to the City of Maplewood. This letter expressed her objection
to the proposed station.
Gary Ketch, 328 South McKnight Road, asked about the property valuation study that the
commission requested from Holiday last September. Associate Planner Roberts said the property
study supplied by Holiday indicated that this proposal would not have a greater negative impact
than an office building, which would be allowed by the current zoning. Mr. Ketch requested an
opportunity to have the residents hire their own real- estate appraiser. Mark Erickson, area
manager for SuperAmerica, felt the Holiday Store would definitely draw traffic from outside the
area. Mr. Erickson mentioned the possibility of potential problems because of the number of
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 08 -21 -95
dispensers in relation to the existence of a car wash.. Mr.'Nelson of Holiday Companies then
answered questions that had been raised. Mr. Frisch, the attorney for Holiday, then offered some
additional remarks. Since there were no further comments, Acting Chairperson Fischer closed
the public hearing. The commission and staff then discussed the proposal.
Commissioner Martin moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Approval of the resolution which changes the Land. Use Plan for the southeast corner of
McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial office) to BC (business
commercial). This change based on the following reasons:
1. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's policies for commercial
development.
2. There would still be a transition zone between this site and the five single dwellings to
the south.
3. There is similar commercial development across McKnight Road in St. Paul as the
proposed Holiday store.
If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall
reconsider this land use plan change.
B. Adopt the resolution which changes the zoning on the southeast corner of McKnight Road
and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). This
change is based on the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the
neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the
property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately
safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community,
where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer,
police and fire protection and schools.
If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall
reconsider this rezoning.
C. Adopt the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a fuel station and car wash
on property zoned BC (business commercial) at the southeast corner of McKnight Road and
Lower Afton Road. This permit is based on the findings required by the code and subject to
the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the city stamped July 31, 1995. The
director of community development may approve minor changes.
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 08 -21 -95
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized
within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null. and void. The council
may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The developer shall revise the site plan, for staff approval, omitting any parking spaces
between the attendant's window and the fuel islands (code requirement). The applicant
must still provide enough parking spaces to meet the code.
5. The developer shall revise the site plan, for staff approval, if an on -site retention pond is
required by the Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District.
6. The developer shall submit a Fighting plan for staff approval. Any lighting poles south of
the buildings and fuel island canopy shall aim away from the residential district to the
south. All lighting shall be screened or directed to comply with city code. Site lights shall
not exceed one -foot candle of intensity at a residential lot line (code requirement).
7. The developer shall equip the car wash with a noise reduction package and keep the
southerly door closed while car washing and drying equipment is operating.
8. The fuel station and car wash shall not be open between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. (code
requirement).
9. External speakers shall not exceed the noise standards set by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (code requirement).
10. The developer shall not grade the land or remove any trees between the Holiday store
site and the house at 328 McKnight Road.
11. The city shall not issue a building permit for the proposed development until the city
approves a lot division creating this site and the deed is recorded with Ramsey County.
D. Approve the code change which allows two fuel - dispenser islands for minor fuel stations
rather than one island. The number of fuel dispensers allowed shall not change.
Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes -all
The motion passed.
BUSINESS
Commissioner Ma ft the Planning Commission meeti ime (9:05 p.m.).
A. Amber Hills Fifth Addition Street, south of Linwood Avenue)
Ken Robe , associate planner, presented ff report. Bill Dolan, the developer, was
pre He told the commission that he had read the report and agreed with it. Mr. Dolan
so answered questions from the commission.
AGENDA NO.
AGENDA REPORT �� � o Action UI -Ici . Action .
Fndorsed.. r
TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager Mod fied
lRe j ected.
FROM: Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager Date
RE: Organized Collection -- Formally Starting the Process
DATE: February 12, 1996
INTRODUCTION
On January 8, 1996, the City Council decided to delay for a month a decision on whether to go
forward with the process to organize collection of residential refuse, as it was expected that
responses to a question in the community survey would be tallied and thus could provide
guidance in this decision. Residents who volunteered comments after reading articles about
organized residential collection in Maplewood in Motion and the Maplewood Review last
summer were overwhelmingly against changing the current "modified organized collection"
system in which refuse collection days are specified for various parts of Maplewood.
Community survey results were not consistent with individual comments made by phone or by
mail last year, however: they indicate that organized collection is favored by a 56% to 38
margin, with 20% of the respondents stating that they would strongly oppose any change from
the current system.
Following the statutory process (MSA 115A.94) for organized collection is long and requires a
significant investment of staff resources. In order to have an orderly transition to organized
collection by January 1, 1997, the Council should start the process by adopting a resolution
setting a public hearing for March 11, 1996. What follows is a timeline of work to be
accomplished and formal actions to be taken through the balance of the year.
TIME LINE
February 12, 1996: Adoption of the Resolution of Public Notice.
Statute requires the City Council to adopt a resolution announcing the City's intent to consider
organizing collection of residential refuse and setting a public hearing to begin the process. The
hearing must be held at least two weeks after public notice and "mailed to persons known by the
City to be operating solid waste collection services in the city." Notice of the hearing would be
published and mailed to licensees. In 1995 there were 29 firms licensed to collect solid waste in
Maplewood; in 1996, 19 firms have been licensed and renewal reminders have been sent to the
remaining 10 companies.
Pageqwo
March 11, 1996: Public hearing
At this meeting, the City Council hears comments from interested parties. If the Council decides
to pursue organized collection, it must adopt a Resolution of Intent To Organize Collection after
closing the public hearing. Adoption of the resolution formally starts the minimum 180 -day time
period to act on an ordinance to organize refuse collection. A minimum 90 -day planning period
begins in which the City must invite licensed haulers to help them develop proposals and plans
for organized collection. (Failure of a licensee to participate during this planning period does not
invalidate the process.)
June 10, 1996: Begin meetings with licensed collectors to discuss collection arrangements
On June 10, the minimum 90 -day planning period is over. The next minimum 90 -day process
.requires the City to "discuss possible organized collection arrangements with all licensed
collectors operating in the city who have expressed interest. If the City is unable to agree on an
organized collection arrangement with a majority of the licensed collectors who have expressed
interest, or upon expiration of the 90 days, the City may propose implementation of an alternate
method of organizing collection..."
During this time the City must meet with licensed haulers to talk about and negotiate contractual
arrangements- -e.g., fees, billing responsibilities, zones.
September 23, 1996: First reading of an ordinance on organized collection
October 14, 1996: Second reading and adoption of an ordinance on organized collection;
Approval of contract(s) with licensed hauler(s)
January 1, 1997: Organized collection of residential refuse begins
RECOMMENDATION
If the City Council wishes to pursue the process to organize the collection of residential
refuse, it is recommended that the Council adopt the attached resolution stating the City's
desire to consider organized collection and setting a public hearing for March 11, 1996, to
consider a Resolution of Intent To Organize Collection.
j'
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
RA.MSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR MARCH 11, 1996
TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION OF INTENT
TO ORGANIZE COLLECTION OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 115A.94 specifically authorizes a City to organize collection of
solid waste, "a system ... in which a specified collector, or a member of an organization of
collectors, is authorized to collect from a defined geographic service area or areas some or all of
the solid waste that is released by generators for collection "; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that organizing collection of residential solid waste may
result in maximizing efficiency and economy in solid waste collection, and may enhance public
health and safety; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has invited residents on a self - volunteering basis or through
participation in a community survey to relate their preferences for the City to undertake the
process to organize collection,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood that:
1) A public hearing be held on March 11, 1996, for to obtain public comments regarding the
advisability of the City going forward with the statutory process to organize collection of
residential refuse; and
2) A notice of this hearing be published in the City's official newspaper and mailed to all
firms licensed by the City of Maplewood to collect solid waste.
Adopted February 12, 1996
Gary W. Bastian
Mayor
AGENDA ITEM a..
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Reo
j ecte
Date
SUBJECT: Driveway Ordinance — Second Reading
DATE: February 2, 1996
Attached is the new driveway ordinance ro osal. The first reading of this p p g s n ew
ordinance was completed at the January 22, 1996, city council meeting. Staff
recommends that the second reading of this new ordinance take place at the
February 12, 1996, council meeting.
I' • lI
jc,
Attachment
ARTICLE IV. DRIVEWAYS
DIVISION 1. GENERALLY
Section 29 -86. Purpose of article.
The purpose of this article is to establish design standards for driveways
providing access to and from private property located along and adjacent to p ublic
street right of way.
Sec. 29 -87. Scope of article
The scope of this article is intended to be consistent with Minnesota Statutes,
Section 160.18, subdivision 3.
Sec. 29 -88. Definitions.
The following words, terms, and phrases shall have the following respective
meanings:
Corner clearance: On property adjacent to -a street intersection, the distance
between the edge of the street right of way ot intersected b the drivew and the
Y Y y
nearest edge of the driveway.
Double driveways: Connected driveways that provide ingress and egress to the
street right of way at two separate accesses from a single property
Driveway width: Distance at the narrowest oint between parallel edges of
p p g the
driveway. The width shown includes surface, shoulders, or gutters.
Sec. 29 -90. General regulations.
(a) If the terms of a permit issued under this article are violated, the director
of the public works department may revoke the access.
(b) A driveway turn - around must be constructed with each new home fronting
on an arterial street, as designated in the city's comprehensive plan.
(c) A variance from the standards set forth in this article may be allowed by
the public works department when the variance will facilitate a safe, efficient use of the
property without interference to the construction, maintenance, or safe and efficient use
of the adjacent property and the street and its appurtenances.
(d) The community design review board will review all commercial driveway
permit applications as part of the review of the commercial property improvements.
Secs. 29 -91 -29 -100. Reserved,
DIVISION 2. CONSTRUCTION AND
STREET- ACCESS PERMITS
Sec. 29 -101. Required.
Authorization to construct or alter a driveway shall consist of a permit issued b
the public works department. Supplemental permits may also be required by other
governing authorities. No alterations to driveways may be made at any time without
permission from the public works department.
Sec. 29 -102. Applications.
As a part of the permit application, a driveway layout, or plan view, of the
Y P ,
property and proposed driveway shall be submitted. The plan view shall include
buildings and any other relevant resent or planned appurtenances. Layouts P P pp y is shall be
drawn to scale or fully dimensioned on a reproducible sheet of P a er.
P
Sec. 29- 103 --29 -115. Reserved,
DIVISION 3. CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
Sec. 29 -116. Dimensions.
The approved driveway widths are as follows:
Residential: minimum-12'(3.65 m), maximum -32' (9.75 m)
The approved minimum distance between nearest edges of double driveways is
20' (6.10 m). The approved corner clearances are as follows:
Arterial street: 30' (9.15 m)
Nonarterial street: 30' (9.15 m)
Sec. 29 -117. Gradient.
The profile of the driveway shall slope upward from the edge of the street, at a
minimum, to the edge of the right of way. The maximum gradient shall be thirteen (13)
percent.
C
Sec. 29 -118. Driveway angle.
The angle between the driveway nd the intersecting street right of w
Y g g ay shall not
be less than sixty (60) degrees.
Sec. 29 -119. Location.
Driveways shall have a setback of at least five (5) feet (1.5 m from the s' O ) side or
rear lot lines, except by written agreement with the owner of the ad'acent lot.
1
Sec. 29 -120. Enforcement.
If a driveway is constructed contrary o this article the city may require that Y y y q at the
driveway, or a portion. thereof, be removed.
Secs. 29- 121 ---29 -135. Reserved.
i
4
MEMORANDUM Action by Council:
TO: City Manager Endorse
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Modifie
SUBJECT: Park and Ride Lot Rejecte
LOCATION: Highway 61 and Count Road C
LOC g y y Dat e
DATE: February 7, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Mr. David Richter, of 1122 County Road C, asked the city to review the parking situation near the
park and ride lot. He complained that people were parking on the frontage road.
BACKGROUND
On June 28, 1993, the city council asked staff to notify MnDOT about several issues about the
park and ride lot. After this, MnDOT agreed to change the design of the lot. (See the 9 -2 -93 staff
memo and the 8 -25 -96 letter from MnDot.)
The State of Minnesota built the park and ride lot in 1994 when Ramsey County rebuilt County
Road C. Since it was a state project, the city council was not able to review or approve the lot
design. MnDot, however, did work with city staff to resolve some issues with the lot.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the parking situation near the park and ride lot and direct staff as to what action the
council wants to take.
kr /p: /Sec 9 /pridelot.mem
Attachments:
1. 9 -2 -93 staff memo
2. 8 -25 -93 MnDot letter
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: MnDOT Park and Ride Lot
DATE: September 2, 1993
Last June, the City Council requested that MnDOT make the following changes to their
Park and Ride Lot at County Road C and Highway 61:
1. Provide concrete curb and gutter around the entire parking lot, rather than just the
west side.
20 Enlarge the stall widths from 9 to 9.5 feet.
3. Move the .parking lot as far south as possible.
4. Provide landscaping to screen the parking lot from the residences to the west.
S. If possible, reduce the size of the parking lot.
I have .attached MnDOT's letter of reply.
go \b- 5:Mndotlot.mem (9)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. MnDOT Letter
cc: Dave Richter 1122 E. Co. Rd. C
2
VADNAIS HE7G.HTS
• • • • •• • •. • • •
• , • •_ �t •h • •.• • • • • •��! . • • • • • • tt �•
ep • • •• • • 04b ��. • •,• .• ,• • 0 • • • j •• • s v •IIlb * i • •• 1..
•� ' ' CC UNN R0. 0
oa, lb
C�
•� ?� Lym 3
9
BEAM AVE, ..� .Y 8
• • • i • •• ', • •* I •i r
..�� • �•• •/ �• • :! Jo -P. •• ••. •
lb 0
L22)
2 • •
V t;
LU LOIN , •
..�. KONUM AVE
J
R c
Z ALVERokoo DR n ' CT
3 llE�t,CE''S?' OR • PALM
4
3 Oft •• • '• s
co
�tNO�q AVE �-- A VE 3 NOR
. o
o s CT.
SEX I
• - cE WAIS AVE. �. AIS
Age -mamm
•
•• • CR
`' • ,
PK
• VWNG I
so • 4, S'HMEN AVE.
qb 410
?'
.n •• •• • • �•• , %• ••♦ •
• .• , ` ' • !
004% • • • COUPE
.
"maw 411 1 AlW CT.
LOCATION MAP
L.J
N
3
James
v
�■� .E.Iluf1►tl 114 1•,' .
1 �0 1i.9.e 33 , TAW
i Q p N t 1 N . C / q0
I ip min m" 0 MEN
1071 O Q
Q « D
il �
cf
TO 76 140 ire
70 19
__ - - C OUNTY ROAD C _ Al 1•! �.e�� =--
f
, I •♦�
109
oc-
0•/ 9 O r ./ , r 0 I
C
) 01 41111 � c� � - :� !�` , cz3�. o Z `� 11 *
CV
r 1 V
t • 134.5 -
/ Owe. r •
1 C� !. Q• oQ" S ,r1� O • S
.. ■�� �� w �� �r
' O
art
4.
• f • � '
•
o
•
• o 'f
i0 _ ;3 ��� �;. (std •►- 4 C'
(.T 2c+c.)
W
•; a co 3 4-
-4.6 -4
�
:mot IZ arc
� �
. �
�.•
_ .1 r. t
o Z
's0 0 143 •lo ' , �
•
i6o
W
MITSUBISHI
0000" 6
tr ,3
Opp t t
��• `•
2610
J K1 r W
. l2'
�, + • ,� •4 - PEti ' - Dac. ?L88GSS It -f- �, � • �
�= a �r
�..� �...� �.� .rta.r..� � •� � �� � " ED - QC awt. _ l l - 1 - dS
5 1 1 •�' 1 so
Ile t9
- ROYAL NISSAN ;
TOWN AND COUNTRY '� � � f ;`' �� Ls
A .' 7 1590 /
4 �.� ��� �. .��. i. .ram +rawer � �.� S�i� ra.�.� ��. �� bra f • - � O � � .` ` � `!
/ 1 i
. �•.
° . I
.. r
/ If �\00 T'GyTA L E►,
a -)
• _ INV
t �.. 1 p, 8 4c}
- ` (4)
ago c3
a
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
4
N
4
Attachment 2
Minnes Department of Transp �
Metropolitan Division L=- Waters Edge Buildin
AUU
1500 West County Road B2 ti ;
OF Roseville, Minnesota 55113
3
a
582- 1369.
August 25 1993
Mr. Geoff Olson
Director Community Development
.1830 East County Road B
Map lewood , IAN 55109
RE County Road C and Highway 61 Park and Ride lot
Dear Mr. Olson:
At our meeting last month, we reviewed your letter of the Council's
concerns and. their request to make several design changes to the
proposed Park and Ride lot. Subject to your acceptance, I will
agree to make the following changes:
A) Provide curb around the entire parking lot to comply with
the city code. I agree that this is a good policy as it
controls the parking assignments.
B) Enlarge the stall widths from 9 to 9.5 feet in accordance
with the city code. This will reduce the total number of
stalls.
C) Construct a landscaped berm along the westerly side of the
lot opposite the residence of Mr. Richter. This will
reduce the visual impact and restore the screening
presently existing on the side. As you know the plan does
also have landscaping on County Road C adjacent to the lot.
The landscaping will be placed with the safety of the user
also in mind and hence it is not intended to act as a
barrier or wall.
D) Shift the lot as far east as practical and realign the
entrance.
As I stated in our meeting, it is my intent, as well as the
Department, to maintain a good working relationship with both the
Maplewood council and staff. Your early written response will be
appreciated.
S inc
r Morris, P.E.
Assistant Division Engineer State Aid
6�
An Equal opportunity Employer
.Action by C �� -L
MEMORMDUM
To: Michael A. McGuire, City Endorse
From: Bruce K. Anderson, Direct' s & ecreation e
Subj f July 4th Celebration R e j e c t e d.
Dater February 7, 1996 Dat . -
For the February 12, 1996 City Council Meeti
The City Council tabled any action on the Jul 4th Celebration at their meeting on Janua July $ J a ry 22.
Attached is a copy of the Staff Report that was prepared for City Council consideration. It is
my understanding that the City Council spoke with the Commissions on Saturday Febr 3
p y� � , w
regarding this issue.
f ,
IM MORANDUM
To Michael A. McGuir Ci e
From: Bruce K. Anderson, & ecreat on
Subj July 4th Celebration
Date: January 12, 1996
For the January 22, 199 , ity Council Meeting
Introduction
Mayor Gary Bastian and the City Council received a letter dated September 28, 1995, from Joe
Fox, Secretary of the Ramsey County Agricultural Society. Mr. Fox requested that the City
Council consider the possibility of supporting a joint venture with the Ramsey County Fair Board
in 1996. This .issue was discussed briefly at the City CouncIN.Unager meeting on January 4
1.9960 The City Council requested that this issue be placed on the January 22nd agenda.
Back Zou d
The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Department has sponsored a community Fourth of July
Celebration for the past twenty -plus years. The July 4th Celebration was originally held at
Wakefield Park and was relocated to Hazelwood Park three years ago. The City Council has
allocated $15,000 for the July 4th Celebration in 1996, which is primarily used for the fireworks
display.
.1. have attached a memorandum dated December 27, 1995, which outlines some of the issues that
need to be considered prior to m a decision. It is any understanding that Joe Fox will be out
of the country on. anuary I 22 and will not be able to attend the meeting., I have had the oppor-
tunity to speak with Mr. Fox on this issue and he requested that the City Council begin to address
this issue, as a decision will need to be made for lowrange p no later than March 1,
1996.
Recommendation
It is my recommendation that the City Council consider the letter from Joe Fox dated Septem-
ber 28, 1995, regarding the Ramsey County Fair Celebration and provide staff with a recom-
me idation.
� � t
MEMORANDUM
To: Michael A McGuire, a
From Bruce K. Anderson, & Recreation
Subj: July 4th Celebration
Date: December 27, 1995
Our department has sponsored the community July 4th Celebration for the past twenty plus years.
The July 4th Celebration was otig'uay held at Wakefield Park sad has been relocated to Hazed-
woodPark This is a one day event with s budget of appmldmately 525,000, which brJudes a
magtificeat fireworks display.
in 1993, the July 4th CeJebratioa was rained out sad the fireworks were heldin conjunction with
the Ramsey County Fair, following the White Bear Avenue Parade. This proved to be a very
Popular event for the Ramsey County Fair and the fireworks was well Mended. It is a�rsmely
difficult to measure large groups of people, but I believe the crowd was as large for the fireworks
following the White Bear Avenue as it has been. is previous years at Hazelwood Park on July 4th.
Mayor Gary Bastian receival a letter (see stta64 from Toe Fmc, Director of the
Ramsey County Fair Board, requesting that the city establish a new tradition for out community
celebration. His specific request was for the city to sponsor the fireworks, along with other
activities, in conjunction with the Ramsey County Fair and the White Bear Avenue Parade. I
believe there is some merit to this suggestion.
The fond issues should be considered b the Cit Council:
1. The aurent Fourth of July Celebration is a one day event.
2. The city. s, a large amount of money (S25,000 in 1995) for 5reworks and re]ated bands.
3. The Ramsey County Fair is a four day celebration, which includes bands, carnival rides and
s variety of activities ranging from Petting Zoos to Art Fairs to commercial admits.
4. The White Bear Avenue Business Association sponsors a parade, which culminates at the
Maplewood Community Center,
3. The location of the Ramsey County Fair sad the White Bear Avenue Parade in KslRip
to the Maplewood Community Center and City Hall is ideal.
6. Our department sponsored two wccessfiil events as part of the Ramsey County Fair in 1995;
the first being the World's Largest Pog Tournament; sad the second being as Ia -Line Skate
Race down White Bear Avenue.
70 The city could potentially gain greater exposure by having a longer Festival and mcorporatin8
activities and/or events at the Maplewood Community Center, as well.
S. It is always difficult to get vohnteera to coordinate a Festival of this s*= and scope. By lying
ift with the Ramsey County Fair Board and White Bear Avenue Business Asaocaadon, we
have s broad base of support already m place.
9. One of the original reasons for establi shme1rt of a Tiny 4th Celebration is that there were not
ate► fireworks on the northeast side of the Twin Cities. Then are now fireworks displays
0 s the cities of Woodbury, Roseville and Taste of Ivynnesota -
The downside. of joining the Ramsey County Fair aad White Bear Avenue Business Assxiation
is:
1. The city might lose some identity.
2.
I'here has been s along tradition of the Maplewood Fourth ofJuly Celebration.
30 The Fourth of July Celebration could be expaaded to include the Maplewood Malt as a co-
sponsor, esptdallY Da3'ton's, and be expanded to s two to four day. event.
4. Parking may become s problaq should the celebration become too large on White Bear
Avenue during the Ramsey County Fair and the White Bear Avenue Parade.
S.
The city may lose its identity and/or name associated with the Fourth of July Celebration.
It would be my recommendation that this i=sua be placed on the City CounciiIZaaager agenda for
f mrre discussion.
c: Pauline Staples, Recreation Program Manager
Joe Fox, Ramsey County Fair Board
,l
� 1
II
i.
a
•
RAMjEYCOUNTYAGRICULTURAL SO CIETY
1d2111fj*rk Se+aet
x��o�1, Nr�aota SSlO➢
Sepember zs, 1995
OFF'ICEItS
Gard' Bastian, Mayor
City ofMaplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, Mn 35109
Itom z� Dear Mayor Bastiaa and memba�s of the City Co�u►ci1: .
The 1993 Ramsey County Fm is now history and our tvaivations e to tell us that we
�a� Isad a very aceessfiil fair. Summs can be meas�ual is many di�'erent ways but the one measure that
was obvious to me was the cooperation from the business and public comnuunty that worked to not
Fox only keep the fair in this area but made agr�ificant fumcxal aad kedaship cont�utions to the many
ja Secrette�* new' Pro18TStctis• .
'7"4514 Of crnuse we all kaaw that the City's ution of the fireworks was tbt bighiight of this
years fair and the sigtificant imcraase is stteadance evening supports that observation. But your
Cliff C+lIeemoa to the fa'v didn't Mart or end with the firevvor�cs. Staff saembers im the Parks and Recreation
Tn'°et! support to
started several months before
7"4524 7"4524 �Partmerrt were most belpfiil thmughout the planniaB P� w
'�
the fair. Your Parka Department Vonsored events pmded via'b�ity for the Cry of Maplewood and
DDtE�i'ORS 1* iLso eo- �onsored snd aipported other important evaats duriag the fair. I ant say enough
who with this s fair.
.shout the posi�e aad ta�eativ�e leaderstup from Om staff me�nberz �e�ped Y�
�k1 Bsrber � then leads me to address the ftrt�ve -sad the plaaaiag fot the 1996 Rta�sey County Fair'
David Bodakk
which w�l be held luty 24- 28,1996. A community cxaebration involving the V�fiite Bear 8usiaess
Wc�c Hoak
Al p Assoc., the City of Maplewood and the Ramsey Fair aoiild bme5t this whole area. If you and the
taoay �eoenm city cousie� would aipport this joint verrtiu�e I feel we need to m�lce.some pls�mmg da�sions for the
it�bert Retwd i99b fair within the naa fi months. Would you or on your sta$'gve a call regarding your
Sam Sehmiec mews with this idea?
� 3'6ene is one more item Mayor that 3 would h1ce to address. We have had many requests to
u Played agaiA st the couutY fair. Ttu civic organ�tions in Maplewood for one mason or
. another can m qualify or do not choose to obtain a bingo prrmit. The cat}' ordinance would need to
be changed to allow other avic groups outside of Maplewood to apply. Since the fair is i county
wide event we aoutd benefit by having other poops participate in this way, please give this your
consideration. 7bw*s again for Maplrwood's support of the 1995 air.
0� Joe Fob S
C.C. Michael McQuire, Bruce Anderson, CoDen Diricswager
Ramx�• Canat� Fair ..... My 19621 1"S
AGENDA NO. 7
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager
FROM: Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager
RE: Appointments to Joint Ice Arena Board
DATE: February 12, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Action by Co ca "
Enaorse
mo d.if i e .
]Rejecte
Date
On January 8, 1996, the City Council voted to accept a $250,000 "Mighty Ducks" grant awarded
jointly to the ISD 622 and the cities of Maplewood and Oakdale, and to execute a ' oint
J powers
p
agreement for to form an organization to operate and maintain the ice arena complex at Tartan
High School. Each jurisdiction will have two representatives to serve on the board of directors
of the yet- to -be- formally -named organization.
The formal powers of the board are stated generally. The board will have the authority "to
exercise all powers which are common to Oakdale, Maplewood, and the School District which
are necessary and appropriate for the construction, operation use, maintenance, and repair of the
Joint Ice Arena..." Implicit in this list is the authority to issue bonds or obligations. A 1993
State statute requires that if a joint powers board has this authority, "the joint board ... shall be
comprised solely of members of the governing bodies of the governmental units which
established the joint board ..." (Emphases added.)
In short, the Council must appoint two Councilmembers to serve on the Joint Ice Arena Board.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that two Councilmembers be appointed to serve on the Joint Ice Arena Board.
It is further recommended that the City Manager and Assistant City Manager be named as staff
alternates to the Board.
Y
'11
,+ AGENDA REPORT
To: City Manager Michael McGuire
From: Director of Public Safety ��.,l.
F y Kenneth V. Col l i ns
Subject: Loitering Ordinance
Date: January .16, 1996
Introduction
z -g
Action by Coimcil:
Endorsed___
Modified_._
R
Date
The y q
Maplewood City Council re quested that an ordinance-be drafted that would
P
control loitering within the City.
Background
The attached ordinance has been drafted in response to the City Council 's
,request.
The first section of the ordinance contains definitions used within the
ordinance. The second and third sections outline the penalties for violating
various subdiv
Numerous ordinances from other cities and state statutes were reviewed to
gather the information to draft this document.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the.Cit y council make any recommended changes and
approve the first reading of the loitering ordinance, Section 19 -16.
Action Required-
Submit to the City Council for their review and handling.
KVC:js
Attachment
§13 -16 MAPLEWOOD CODE
See. 19 -16. Same -- Loitering.
(a). Definitions. For the purpose of this section, the following
terms shall have the follo`N.ring respective meanings ascribed to them:
(1) Premise - any yard, lot, parcel, sidewalk, boulevard, street,
highway, alley, park, playground., restaurant, cafe, church,
school, any car or other motor vehicle, parking lot drive -in,
building used for business, commercial or industrial
purposes, washroom, lavatory, apartment. hallway or other
location whether public or private in the City of
Maplewood.
(2) Business prentise - all premises, either public or private,
which include a facility that has established open and
closed hours. Nonbusiness premises shall include all other
premises in the City of Maplewood.
(b) whoever commits any of the following acts. constitutes a
nuisance against public order and is guilty of a petty misdemeanor:
(1) Lingering about the doorway of any building, or sitting or
lingering upon the steps, window s i l l s , railing, fence, or
parking area adjacent to any building in such manner so as to
obstruct or partially obstruct ingress to or egress from such
building or in such a manner- to annoy the owner or
occupant.
(2) Remaining for more than five minutes on any private business
premise which is posted -with a conspicuous sign containing
the words "No loitering" when:
(a) the business establishment is closed; or
(b) the person charged does not visibly demonstrate any
intent to conduct business at the establishment or to
leave the premise after having conducted such business.
(3) Lingering for more than five minutes on any public
business premise which is posted with a conspicuous si
containing the words "No loitering" when such premise
neither has been nor will be open for business within 30
minutes.
State law reference -- M.S. § 509.725, subd 2.
Cross References -- Mun Corp 111(1).
NUISANCES §19 -16
(4} Lingering for more than five minutes on any public or
private non- business premise which is posted with a
conspicuous sign containing the words "No loitering ". .
(S) Lingering for any length of time upon any public or private
premises or moving in a slow and deliberate manner without
purpose or otherwise interfering with, obstructing, or
rendering difficult or unreasonable for passage any P ublic
roadway, sidewalk, parking area, or right -of -way after having
been warned within the preceding four months, either orally
or in %witing, by the owner, agent, manager or person in
charge thereof, or by any peace officer or employee of the
City of Maplewood, that such conduct will result in a charge
under this section. The provisions of the paragraph shall be
applicable only along any street posted as a "No cruising
zone" and only between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m.
(c) Whoever commits any of the following acts is guilty of a
misdemeanor:
(1) Failing or refusing to vacate or leave any premises after
being requested or ordered, either orally or in writing, to do
so by the owner, agent, manager, or person in charge
thereof, or by any peace officer or employee of the City of
Maplewood, or returning within two hours thereafter to the
premises after having been so requested or ordered to
vacate such premises.
(2) Any of the acts described in part (a ), paragraph 1 through 5
of this section, when less than one year has elapsed since
the individual was found guilty of a violation of this
section.
�►
AGENDA ITEM
J-
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
City Manager
Assistant City Engineer w
Action by Council:
Endorse d�_____a,.
Modifie
lie j ecte ci-..�.�...
Date
Project 95 -17, Trunk Highway 61 Water Main - Beam Avenue to County
Road D
February 5, 1996
Attached is the resolution approving the plans and authorizing the advertisement
of bids. Also enclosed is the advertisement for bids. Staff will present the plans and
specifications for the water main improvement project at the February 12, 1996 cit
council meeting.
Staff has designed the project according to the cou
g p � g approval of the
feasibility study. As proposed, the project would provide municipal water availability � p p Y to
the properties east of Highway 61, between Beam Avenue and County Road D. The
water main would be installed approximately 25 feet east of the edge of the highway
g Y
shoulder. Fire protection, through the installation of fire hydrants, will also be p rovided.
The engineer's estimate for the total project cost is $233,630.00. This cost is
significantly higher than the consultant's cost of $134,000.00 in the feasibility stud
. Y .
Y
The differences are due primarily to the costs of clearing, grading, driveway estoration
Y
the Amoco pipeline crossing, extension of Mn /DOT culverts, and permanent erosion
control, all of which were not included in the feasibility study's estimate. The plans and
Y Y p
specifications, as proposed, do not include service stub outs for any of the properties.
p
St. Paul Water Utility could tap services in the future as requested by the individual
property owners, at the owners' expense.
The increase in project costs brings the cost per front to $75.00, a $32.00
increase over the feasibility study's $43.00. Assessing the entire project cost becomes
extremely questionable at this price. Staff sees a few options for the council to
consider:
1. Continue with the advertising and see what comes in for bid prices.
2. Assess only $45.00 per front foot and cover the remainder of the cost with
alternate funding sources (Hydrant Fund etc.).
3. Cancel the pro
Staff will await the direction of the cit council re the followin possible
actions:
1 Approval of the plans and specifications.
2. Authorization of the advertisin for bids.
3. Approval of financin plan for the project.
4. Cancellation of the project.
RAM
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
The City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota will receive sealed bids for the construction of the
following project within the city limits on the basis of cash a ment for the work: p Y .Trunk Highway 61
Water Main, Beam Avenue to County Road D, City Project 95 -17.
The project will include the following approximate quantities:
3000 cy common excavation /salvaged topsoil 2750 If 12" water main
2150 If silt fence 7 ea hydrants and 6" valves
3.20 ac turf restoration 2 ea 12" g ate valves
Associated culvert reinstallation, traffic control, erosion control, turf
establishment, and all appurtenances
The project is to begin on or about May 15, 1996, and be completed by June 15, 1996.
Bids will be received until 10 a.m. on the 6th day of March, 1996, at the municipal buildin g,
p
1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota, at which time and place all bids will be publicly
Y
opened, read aloud, and considered.
Proposals must be placed in a sealed envelope with the statement thereof "BID FOR TH 61
WATER MAIN, PROJECT 95 -17." Proposals shall be submitted to the city clerk p y k on or before the
above - stated time. Proposal is for the furnishing of all labor, equipment, and materials and
performing all work in connection with the above- stated construction.
Plans, specifications, proposal forms, and contract documents are on file in the office of the
City Engineer, 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109. Copies of
p p the documents
must be purchased from the office of the city engineer by a ment of $40 (nonrefundable) to the Cit pY Y
of Maplewood for each set.
All bids must be accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, in an amount equal to five percent (5 %) of the total bid. Failure of the
successful bidder to enter into a contract in accordance with said bid or to furnish such performance
bonds as specified shall constitute forfeiture of said bid bond to the city. No bid may be withdrawn
for at least 90 days after the scheduled closing time for the receipt of bids, without the consent of the
city council.
The city council reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any informalities -in
bidding.
Lucille E. Aurelius, City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Publish: Maplewood Review: February 14 & 21, 1996
Construction Bulletin: February 16 & 23, 1996
vi
RESOLUTION
APPROVING PLANS
ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on January 8,
1996, plans and specifications for Trunk Highway 61 Water Main, Project 95 -17 have
been prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has presented such
plans and specifications to the council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the
city clerk.
2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper
and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the makin g of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall
be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specif
p Y
the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the
council at 10:00 a.m., on the 6th day of March, 1996, at the city hall and that no bids
shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied b
p Y a
certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five
percent of the amount of such bid.
3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to
receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted and to
tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids, and the award of a
contract, at the regular city council meeting of May 13, 1996.
Iq
NMI
MEMORANDUM Act 1. on by C ounci l
To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manag
From: Bruce K. Anderso n Director of P c ion Endorsed..
Subj : Maplewood Nature Center Modifie
Date: Febru a ry 1 1996 Rejecte For the February 12, 1996, City Council Meeting date
Introduction
The City retained Diane Klausner Associates Inc. to redesign the outdoor entrance to the Nature
Center to better serve the trail users. Attached is a copy of the Master Plan, which has been
reviewed and adopted by the Park and Recreation Commission, s well as the Maplewood Nature
p
Center staff.
The City Council has budgeted $34 ,000 for Nature Center improvements in 1996. The pre ' '-
nary estimates for the proposed outdoor improvements are $60,000, including architectural
services.
Background
The Maplewood Nature Center was developed in the earl 1970 °s. Dunn the p ast twent
p Y g p
years, the Nature Center has provided environmental education and outdoor classes for thousands
of Maplewood residents. In 1994, the Nature Center Building was expanded to include new
office space and a general purpose Meeting Room. The outdoor grounds have had minimal
improvements during the past twenty -plus years.
The Master Plan would provide for improved access to the Nature Center and increased
educational opportunities through outdoor displays at the kiosk. In addition, it will improve the
Trail System, better serving not only the walkers, but also organized groups for snowshoe and
small group interpretation sessions.
Highlights of the plan include an expanded kiosk and outdoor open seating area, "softening" of
the entrance to the Nature Center through increased lantin s and landscape material develop-
p g p � -
p
ment of a Butterfly Garden, small water pond area for aquatic plants and a new window. One of
the educational objectives of the Nature Center will be to provide alternative landscape plans and
method for residents to use. The newly designed area will serve as a demonstration area for Ci
residents regarding plant materials, native prairie grasses and natural outdoor amenities.
Recommendation
It is staffs recommendation that the City Council adopt the Services Agreement prepared b
p � p p Y
Diane Klausner Associates Inc. at a cost of 8% of the final bid award for preparation of final
bid plans and specifications, and allocate an additional $25,000 from unallocated Commercial
P.A.C. monies to develop the Master Plan. There are adequate monies in the Park Dedication
Fund to complete the project, as proposed.
DIANE KL AUSNER
ASSOCIATES INC.
January 14,1996
Mr. Bruce K. Anderson
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Dear Bruce:
16020 36th Place N.
Plymouth, MN 55446
(612) 550 -0413
This contract letter outlines Scope of Services, Compensation, and other elements
which constitutes an agreement between the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,
hereinafter referred to as OWNER and DIANE KLAUSNER ASSOCIATES
INC., hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT for landscape architectural
services required to assist the OWNER with design development and
construction documents for the entry design of the Maplewood Nature Center,
The OWNER and CONSULTANT agree as set forth below:
A. SCOPE QF BASIC SERVICES
The work program will include the following:
1. Master Plan Design Development, Construction
Drawings and Specifications
2. Preparation of job Cost Estimate
3. Meetings with Nature Center Staff and City to Review
Planting Plan, Site Details and Furnishings
4. Construction Observation and Inspection
B. SCOPE OF A DDMONAL SERVICES
The following Services have not been requested by the OWNER but are available
upon request from the CONSULTANT.
1. Preparation of a maintenance manual which would include descriptions
and characteristics of each woody and herbaceous plant on the landscape
plan. The list includes maximum width and height of mature p lants,
blooming time, color of blossoms and fruits (if any), seasonal color changes,
.
. ... y g
as well as pruning, fertilizing and upkeep requirements.
C. OWNERS RESPONSIBILITIES
1. The OWNER shall be responsible for providing the CONSULTANT with
spot elevations as needed.
20 THE OWNER shall be responsible for reproduction of bid sheet instructions,
forms, specifications and construction drawing blueprints.
D. COMPENSATION
For the Construction Documents, Job Cost Estimate, Meetings, On -Site
Construction Supervision (Paragraph'A) services Diane Klausner Associates
provides, it is agreed that Diane Klausner Associates Inc. will be compensated at
o p
8 /o (Eight Percent) of the final bid award.
Additional Services beyond the scope of Basic Services will be performed only
when authorized by you in advance. Compensation for additional services will
be at my hourly rate of $40.00 /hour.
Reimbursable expenses are the actual expenses made by Diane Klausner
Associates in the interest of the project. These may include but are not limited to
mileage, film, reproduction, printing, facsimile and mailing. Mileage is calculated
at $.30 /mile. Total reimbwrsible expenses are estimated at $150.00 - $300.00.
E. SCHEDULE
I am available to begin immediately. I anticipate drawings to be ready by
April 1,1996.
F. M_ I _SCELLANEOUS
It is understood that neither DIANE KLAUSNER ASSOCIATES or the OWNER
have control over the factors that determine construction costs, and the actual
bids or negotiated construction costs may vary from any estimates of such costs
that DIANE KLAUSNER ASSOCIATES may prepare.
This agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days written
notice should either fail to substantially perform in accordance with its terms,
•
r
through no fault. of the party that initiates the termination.. In the .event of
termination, DIANE KLAUSNER ASSOCIATES shall, be compensated for all
services performed and expenses incurred to the date.
This letter is intended to be the entire agreement between us. Any changes or
additions to this agreement must be made in writing and signed by both of us.
This copy, and an additional copy of this letter agreement, have been signed by
me on behalf of DIANE KLAUSNER ASSOCIATES. If this agreement is
satisfactory, please sign and date as indicated below. Once you have signed both
copies, please return one to Diane Klausner Associates and retain the other- for
your file. My receipt of the fully signed copy will constitute my authorization to
proceed. Thank you again for your selection of Diane iQausner Associates on this
project.
Respectfully submitted,
DIANE KLAUSNER ASSOCIATES INC. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
f
Diane Klausner Date Bruce K. Anderson Date
mom
AGENDA ITEM
i
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager
City Engineer
VEM Budget Adjustment— Mowing Equipment
February 5, 1996
During preparation of the 1996 budget, the parks department expressed an interest in
increasing their rotary mowing capabilities. Rotary owers have a much higher quality
y 9 q tY
cut than the flail mowers currently used on much of the park turf. Rotary mowing has
Y g
the advantage of providing a safer, more attractive, and healthier turf.
In 1996, . $62,840 was budgeted for a large rotary mower. This was based on
preliminary considerations. Since that time an extensive evaluation rocess
p has been
carried out by the VEM division with the full cooperation of the arks department. A
p p
number of different brands and types of rotary mower equipment has been evaluated.
The evaluation process was very successful and resulted in directing he decision to
g a
very obvious choice.
Rather than purchasing one large rotary mower it would be much more efficient to
purchase two slightly smaller units to be used b two separate crews. The intention
Y p nti n
would be to form two mowing crews with similar equipment. Each crew would have a
large rotary mower, a medium size riding ota mower, and small hand g rY equipment.
Unfortunately there are no trailers in the fleet at the present time that would
accommodate this mix of equipment.
The purchase price of the two new rotary mowers would be very similar to the budget
amount of $62,840. There was no money budgeted for additional trailers, however. It
is estimated the total cost of purchasing two trailers is between $8,000 and $10
The VEM does have a positive balance and indeed could cover the cost of this
additional purchase.
This type of an operation would save wear and tear on equipment since one vehicle
and one trailer would haul all the mowing equipment for a given crew. Present) each
9 Y
piece of mowing equipment is hauled by a separate truck on a separate trailer.
2
February 5, 1996
It is recommended that the cit council authorize a budget adjustment of $10 000 ' in the
VEM fund to finance
the purchase of two new trailers for mowing equipment.
f � � g q pment. Further,
authorize staff to solicit bids for two new rotary mowers.
KGH
jc
I
AGENDA NO.
AGENDA REPORT ��e�Ulon by Council
TO: Mayor and City Council Modified
Rejecte
Date
FROM: City Manager ...
RE: RELIEF ASSOCIATION SHORTFALL
DATE: February 2, 1996
INTRODUCTION
Attached is a copy of a letter from the Maplewood Fire Fighters Relief Association
informing the City that they have a shortfall of $13,577.38.
BACKGROUND
This has occurred in the past and continues to largely because the City of Oakdale
does not contribute at the same level that Maplewood does. Every year that there has
been a shortfall, Maplewood has paid the difference, with the exception of 1993 when
the three fire departments contributed towards it.
DISCUSSION
After receiving the letter, I contacted Oakdale City Administrator Craig Waldron and
asked that they consider paying a portion of the shortfall for 1995 and increase their
contribution for 1996. Two days later, Mr. Waldron called and informed me that
Oakdale could contribute $5,000 towards the 1995 shortfall and that they would
substantially increase their contribution for 1996.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a payment of $8,577.38 to the
Maplewood Fire Fighters Association (with the balance of $5,000 being contributed
from Oakdale) from the 1996 Contingency Account.
Attachment
Maplewood Fire Fighters
Relief Association
January 16, 1996
Mr. Michael McGuire
Maplewood City Manager
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. McGuire:
JAN 1.81996
V)
We recently received the City of Maplewood's 1995 contribution of $102,241.62.
The funding level certified to you according to our schedules I, II, and III, was $131,079.00.
Landfall and Oakdale remitted amounts, $1,781 and $13,499 respectively, in accordance with
their contracts with East County Line Fire Department. The remaining portion of $115,799 less
the amount the City of Maplewood contributed leaves a balance due in the amount of $13 5 77.3 8.
I am requesting your assistance in addressing the Maplewood City Council to request the
additional funds due the Maplewood Firefighters Relief Association. Your assistance in this
matter is greatly appreciated. Please give me a call at 731 -3437 if you have any questions or
require any additional information.
Sincerely,
�ys s
Edward P. Fitzgerald
President M. F. R. A.
P.O. Pox 9053 • North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109
(Rt� Ice'
T A FF Ac t!
Endorsed—__
ENERGY AUDIT STUDY Modifie
$e3 eeted._____ -_
1830 County Road B East �$te
Maplewood MN, 55109
February 6, 1996
Prepared by; The Parks and Recreation Debt.
Prepared for : City council
Meeting Date February 12th, 1996
The purpose of this report is to request approval for a o% interest free loan through the NSP
Local Government Program. In the fah of 1995 .staffs requested from council approval for
� pp
engineering fees. Whose fees were approved and the City hired Sam Stewart and Assoc. to
prepare Energy Audit Reports for City Hall, Public works, Parks and Recreations Garage and the
Community Center. The engineering study has been completed for city hall. In this report there
are sixteen opportunities of energy savings recommended. Where is a detailed p
economic summary and engineering aar�alysis of each oppo the report. Staff has reviewed
this :report and - recommends that the city o with the sixteen energy saving opportunities.
,� gY g Pp
The total loan amount needed for the project is $74,78x. The loan period is ten years. The loan
will be paid through the monthly utility bills. The pro g is desi ed to save more mone in
p .
�'
energy than the project will cost. The cost of the project will be absorbed in energy savings and-
the city will not see an increase m the utility bills unless there is a gate increase.
There is inforTnation in the summary that allows you to see the Yb
Simple Payback Years of each
p
opportunity. Some opportunities show a higher payback than others. However, the total payback
years for the project are 3.4. This allows the city he opportunity to u p gr ade eq uip ment , rove
tY pp tY p� '� p � p
, building operating costs and temperature control and absorb the costs within, that 3.4 year
-payback. Eventually all these items will need to be addressed if not from roactive approach
p pP
from a reactive approach. The cost for the city will be :higher eventually if we elect to complete
-these projects on an individual basis.
enclosed for your review are detailed descriptions, Cost savings, initial cost and the NSP
Incentive for each opportunity. Information on the total project also is enclosed. A -co py of the
complete Energy Audit Report is available for review.
i i
S Y:
1 Engineering fees . has been retained and carried over to the 1996 bud g et. The amount carried
over is 58,850.
2. Engineering Audit has been completed for City Hall with detailed energy savings
opportunities.
3. Engineering Audit has been reviewed by staff. Staff has selected the opportunities in the
:report.
4. Staff requests that council approve loan agreement NSP to complete project.
5. Upon approval of the loan. Staff will request .Sam Stewart and Assoc. to begin the contractor
selection process.
6. Contractors are selected. Schedule work to begin.
7. Sam Stewart and Assoc. will begin the engmeermg audit on the cd center and .Parks
and Rec. Garage.
Staff has selected to complete one project at a time. when one building has been completely
p y
retrofitted, - eve will begin the process for the next building. City has the greatest energy
savings potential. 'Wherefore, we elected to start with that buildin g first.
(2.3 %) Miscellaneous Equipment
(21.1 %) Lighting Systems (Indoor;
(1.8 %) Heating. Systems
(34.2 %) Air Conditioning
►) Air Handling Units
(1.4 %) Exhaust Fans
(1D.7 %) Lighting Systems (Outside)
%) Pumps
EC d .#
#1
1#2
1 #3
#4
#5
#6
#7
SUMMARY OIL ENERGY CONSERVATION AND ELECTRIC LOAD MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
S
p
t
EC d .#
#1
1#2
1 #3
#4
#5
#6
#7
SUMMARY OIL ENERGY CONSERVATION AND ELECTRIC LOAD MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
MAPLEWOOD ' CITY
HALL
PAGE 1
.
.
;.
........ : . .::.:...:.- ...............
<< . tin i ..
1 . Ede ..... .. .......
......... .
ro ss
Ne
:: .,:::
P.....:.::. . .....
Esti `ate` En 9 �
En r n'' ....
... ...... .
" "' i . ...... . .
Inrho I
:NS
..........
:Inrba .... .....
........ ...
....
.. ttit�a
�:
P. ck a $.
ay. ........ .
n' .
.............
Re uc . ................
on .........
De` c
sn p b n:
C:.
os
.g u.
o n'
.. tY
...
t '' >:.
' ve. n� ..... ........
..... ...
1 i .r. D D ...
1.1f
���`
1111 :
............
.... ................... .. .
. ................ .
sp ... ..
. ............... 0 e:
Retrofit existing 2x4 3 -lamp
$3
$972
$2,257
$617
3.7
11
2.6 L 100
Parabolic Fixtures (4,160 Hrs/Yr)
`
with three (3) T8 lamps and one (1)
:1
Reduced Power Electronic Ballast
Retrofit existing 2x4 3 -lamp
$6,567
$1,121
$5,4
$886
6.1 _
1 1 21 1
i
5.4. L 100
Parabolic Fixtures (2,080 Hrs/Yr)
w ;'
with three (3) T8 damps and one (1)
Reduced Power Electronic Ballast
Retrofit existing 1x4 2 -lamp
$2,272
$7 t 2
$1,5,
$461
3.4
10
12 L 100
fixtures (8,736 Hrs/Yr) with two (2)
T8 lamps and one (1) Reduced
.Power Electronic Ballast
Retrofit existing 1 x4 2 -lamp
$3
$911
r
o
$2
$510
5.5
9110
2.2 L 100
fixtures (4,160 Hrs/Yr) with two (2)
T8 lamps and one (1) Reduced
Power Electronic Ballast
Retrofit existing 1 x4 1 -lamp
$713
$212
$501
$108
4.7
2
0.3 L 100
fixtures (8,736 Hrs/Yr) with one (1)
.
T8 lamp and one (1) Reduced
Power Electronic Ballast
fi
Retrofit existing 4x4 6 -lamp
$511
$1 12
$3 9
$89
4.5
1 123
0.5 L 100
fixtures (2,080 HrsNr) with four (4)
T8 lamps and one (1) Standard
Electronic Ballast
'
Retrofit existing 1 x8 2 -lamp
$1,472
$346
l
$1,1`6
$162
7.4
3 459
004 L 100
fixtures (8,736 HrsNr) with four (4)
4 Foot T8 lamps and one (1)
Standard Electronic Ballast
#8
�#10
#11
�#12
#13
#14
#15
#16
SUMMARY OF ENERGY CONSERVATION AND ELE CTRIC LOA MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
... .
.......
. . . ......... .. ..........
....
....
. . . ................. X%
........... . ..... ..
....... . ..... ...... . a
...... ............ .... ...........
......... . .......... ..
. ............
.. . . .......
. Gt
......
........... .............
............... .....
....
.. .... M 6*"
........................
l
.. . .....
!In al
......... . ....
.... ..
NSPv
.. nraal:,
a .....
........... ...........
.... . k .....
P 81 6.
...... ...
.......
....... ..
0
De 's''c"n"' n . . .... ....
PUP
C.69 t
Bo'unt� ......
...... .
......
.... ..... or ........
S. i.n
av
. ........
'Ne arS
............. T ...............
.... .
W
Replace existin Incandescent
$1 ,853
$634
$192-49
$459
2.7
9,088
Flood lamps or Fixtures with
Fluorescent lamps or Fixtures
)nstall Occupanc Sensors in
P y
$3,900
$839
$3
$468
6.5
8,385
locations that are randoml
occupied
Install Power Factor Correction
$666
None
$660
$113
5.8
Reduce operatin hours on AH U #2
None
None
None
$5,908
Immediate
72,997
Utilize Steam Boiler onl when
p
None
None
None
$35/Da
Immediate
needed for Preheat or Humidification
Reduce hours of operation of
$19400
$350
.$1 00�
$1,164
0.9
12,934
Smokin and Restroom Exhaust
Inspect and Recalibrate all
$29240
None
$292,40
$2
0.9
42
.T6mperature Controls
Install Adjustable Speed Drives
$3,981
$420
$3
$19665
2.1
509442
on AHU #2 Suppl and Return Fans
. must q ualif y for Bount
Install- a new Facility Monitorin
$429250
$59543
$36
$3
1 0.5
559429
and Control S
T. ................. . . .................
. .......
. ..................... .
$ 7 4 1_.' $
.7
....
. .............. 2`1
. ... .. *' ** slo
Z' ....
$1.8 .07.
... . ...... ...
. .......... ..... .
:: ..........
_.. a .......... .............. ..........
4 240
........ ................ ......
......
PAGE 2
. .........
i� ...........
................
..........................
.....................
....................
N SP ............................ .
1.71 L 104
2.01 L 113
SUMMARY OF OPPORTUNITIES
Page
Opportunity #1
- Replace Fluorescent Lams Ballasts
6- 4
with (3) more eff icient lamps and
(1) Electronic Ballast (4 Foot
.3-Lamp Fixtures , 4 firs /Yr )
Opportunity #2
AM Replace Fluorescent ent Lamps /Ballasts
6.. 7
with (3) more efficient lamps and
(1) Electronic Ballast (4 Foot
3-Lamp Fixtures, 2 Hrs /Yr)
Opportunity #3
- Replace Fluorescent Lamps /Ballasts
6-10 .
with (2) more efficient lamps and
(1) Elect ,Ballast (4 Foot
2 -Lamp Fixtures, 8,736 Hrs Yr
Opportunity #4
- Replace Fluorescent Lamps /.Ballasts
6
with (2) more eff icient lamps and
(1) Electronic Ballast (4 Foot
2 -Lamp Fixtures, 4 Hrs Yr
T " - _ ._ - _Qpportunity .... #5 - --
: �e�lace- Flue: esc -+ant
- - . _Laarps, Ba11asts - . - .. -
with (1) more efficient lam p and
(1) Electronic Ballast (4 Foot.
1-Lamp F ixtures, 8 Hrs Yr
Opportunity #6 -
Replace Fluorescent .Lamps /Ballasts
6 - 19
with (4),more effic lam
lamps and
(1) Electronic Ballast (4 Foot
6 -Lamp Fixtures, 2 Hrs Yr
Opportunity #7 -
Replace Fluorescent scent .._ Lamps /ballasts
6 22 - -
with (2) more efficient lamps and
_
(1) Electronic Ballast (8 Foot
2 - Lamp Fixtures, 8 Hrs Yr
Opportunity #8 -
Replace exis sting ting Incandescent
Flood Lamps or Fixtures with
h
6
more efficient Fluorescent Lamps
or Fixtures
Opportunity #9 -
Install Occupancy ensors '
Y in
locations that are randomly
6--2
- occupied
6 - 1
4
Summa Of O
pportunities, .page 2
Opportunity #10
- .Install Capacitors to improve
Power Factor to 90 percent
opportunity #11
- Reduce operating on
..hours
Air Handling Unit #2
Opportunity #12
- Utilize the
e Steam Boiler only
When needed for preheat or '
humidif ication -
Opportunity #13
- Reduce ho •
hou of operation of
the Smoking and Restroom
Exhaust Fans
Opportunity #14
- Inspect and '
P recalibrate all
Temperature Controls
Opportunity #15
- Install Adjustabl •
? table Speed Drives
on AM #2 Supply Fan and
Return Fan
_ Opportunity .- . •-# 16
T-n t i 1..e ,� ,�
n.. . acil ity .
Monitoring and Control
System (F74CS)
Page
6 -31
6 -34
6 -37
6 -40
6 -44
6 -47
- 6 6 2
6 - 2