Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1996 01-22 City Council Packet
F' AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, January 22, 1996 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 96 -02 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Council /Manager Meeting of January 4, 1996 2. Minutes of Meeting 96 -01, (January 8, 1996) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA EA. PRESENTATIONS F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval. of Claims 2. Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation (Gorbunow) 3. Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation (Schultz) 4. Budget Adjustment for Sewage Treatment Costs 5. Conditional Use Permit Review - 2873 Highway 61 North (Maplewood Toyota) 6. Board of Adjustment - Dissolution 7. Holiday Differential - Temporary /Seasonal Employees 8. Railroad Lease Buyout - 9. Non -Union Wage Adjustment G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 2. 7:00 P.M.: Ismaili Muslim Community Church (1460 Skillman Avenue) Land use Plan Change (L to C) Conditional Use Permit Street Vacation (Barclay Street) 7:15 P.M.: AT &T Tower (1899 Clarence Street) Tower Moratorium Variance Street Vacation (Curve Street Conditional Use Permit Design Approval H. AWARD OF BIDS NONE Y: I I. UNFIN SHED BUSINESS 1. Holiday StationStore (Lower Afton and McKnight Roads) Land Use Plan Change (CO to BC) Zoning Map Change (CO to BC) Code Change (Minor Motor Fuel Stations) Conditional Use Permit 2. Shoreland Ordinance (2nd Reading) 3. Food and Food Handlers Code Amendment (2nd Reading)_ J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Pondview Apartments "NO PARKING" Request 2. Driveway Ordinance - First Reading 3. July 4th Celebration 4. Landscape Architect Selection for Carver and Edgerton 5. Loitering Ordinance - 1st Reading 6. Audit of Fire Departments 7. Community Center Financial Report 8. Council /Staff Retreat K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. N. ADJOURNMENT F COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 5:00 p.m., Thursday, January 4 1996 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council/Manager workshop of the Ma_ plewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 5 :02 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Present Councilmember Sherry Allenspach Present Councilmember Dale Carlson Present Councilmember Mary Koppen Present Councilmember George Rossbach Present Others Present City Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager Craig Dawson Park & Recreation Director Bruce Anderson Fire Chief Joel Hewitt C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA City Manager McGuire requested that the following item be added: (11) Joint Meetings with Advisory Board and Commissions. Mayor Bastian asked that Item I2 be added: Policy on Snowplowing of Sidewalks. Councilmember Carlson moved approval of the a,g.enda as mended The motion was seconded by Councilmember Allenspach and approved. Ayes: All D. OPEN SPACE City Manager McGuire reviewed the status of the following. properties: 1. Arcon /Grand Property (2413 Carver Avenuel The environmental assessment (EA) report had been completed and noted the presence of some "friable" asbestos and miscellaneous debris that will need to be disposed of properly by the seller of the property. A well on the site would need to be properly abandoned. Staff was working to close the sale of the property in January 1996. Mayor Bastian suggested that the buildings on the site be considered for a practice burn for volunteer firefighters. 2. Stielow Pro erty (1285 Sterling $tree!) The owner's representative, Merrill Paulson, is having a survey prepared to determine the amount of land Ms. Stielow will retain. She will likely keep around two acres of the fifteen or so acres she currently owns. Her asking price was expected to be in the $10,000 to $10,500 per acre range. 3. Kuslich A land survey is being arranged to allow for the creation of three residential lots along Forest Street, and to define the property for the homestead in the southwestern portion of the property. The survey work is expected to be completed in mid- to late - January. If this timetable is kept, the sale should be accomplished within 90 days. 4. Regnier/RJR Development The owners had given a written proposal to sell their land for $109,000, or about $15,600 per acre. Council considered this proposal at the December 1995 Workshop, but gave no direction regarding further action on this property. Council directed that a letter be sent to the Regniers which indicated the City did not wish to pursue their offer at this time. Councilmembers noted that the City had already acquired sizable open space holdings in that general area in Maplewood. 5. Ott: The attorney for the Haller/Bonsell property (Site 173) had not responded to staff requests that the estate prepare a firm offer for the City to consider. E. COMMUNITY FU City Manager McGuire noted that the Council had discussed this item briefly at the November 6, 1995 Workshop and decided to consider it again within a few months. Councilmember Carlson noted difficulties in recruiting residents to serve on a task force to set up a community fund. He believed it would be more appropriate to consider this topic during the Maplewood 2020 process, and councilmembers concurred with his p g suggestion that this item be continued indefinitely. F. RAMSEY COUNTY FAIR It City Manager McGuire noted that the Council had discussed a proposal from the Ramsey County Agricultural Society (aka Ramsey C to have a community celebration involving the White Bear Business Association, the City, and the Fair. He referred to a memorandum in which Park & Recreation Director Anderson identified a number of advantages and drawbacks to focus a Maplewood community celebration during the fair instead of July 4. Councilmember Koppen noted that having fireworks in 1995 during the fair contributed significantly to the success of the Ramsey County Fair. This matter will be placed on the agenda .for the January 22, .1996 City Council meeting. G. CITY COUNCIUSTAFF RETREAT At the December Workshop, the Council agreed to hold a retreat with the staff but could not identify workable dates. After checking their schedules this evening, Council requested staff to arrange a retreat for April 18 -19 or April 11 -12 (in order of preference). H. FIRE DEPARTMENT City Manager McGuire introduced Joel Hewitt, who began his duties as Fire Chief on .January 2, 1996. Chief Hewitt shared some information about himself and about his experience as fire chief for the volunteer department of the City of Roseville. He wished to move as quickly as possible to have the three departments currently serving Maplewood to function and act like they're one department during this year. Some things, like consolidating pension plans, may take a few years to accomplish. Hewitt noted that the combined activity level of the three departments is high- -800 fire calls and 2500 EMS calls. Mayor Bastian related his concern about consolidating the fire services stemmed from budget accountability. He believed that there had been a lack of information from the fire departments. Hewitt agreed that the fire service field in general needs to do a better job of communicating with administrators and governing boards, and he would work to make improvements in Maplewood. Among other comments made by councilmembers were: *A desire to see the development of standards or benchmarks in order to help the Council understand what is being done and how things should be done. *An expectation that the Fire Chief will be an advocate for the needs of the fire services. *A recognition by the Chief that there needs to be a balance of personal life and fire department obligations for the firefighters (and for the Chief). *A more rational approach to serve Maplewood, North Saint Paul, and Oakdale. There was concern expressed that 3 Ms spin-off 'in -o company may have different response requirements; as Oakdale may now have -a significant tax revenue stream, it may wish to establish its own fire department. *Will the City need to do more of the recruiting efforts, especially for daytime responders? In the past, recruiting has been handled by the departments.. Councilmember Carlson asked what the Fire Chief would need from the Council to help be successful. H_ ewitt said that the Council needs to realize that the firefighters are the most important resource in the fire service. The areas Council will play an important role will be in pay, equipment, pension, and recognition. Council wished to see a timetable of steps in the process to integrate the fire departments during 1996. Councilmember Koppen excused himself at 5:50 p.m., and indicated he would return shortly. Councilmembers also were sensitive about continuing an appropriate sense of history among each of the three fire departments. They also expressed interest in the successful cooperation of the three public safety services: police, fire, and emergency management. I. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Joint Meetings with Boards and Commissions City Manager McGuire and Mayor Bastian said they had received several phone calls from members of advisory boards and commissions to have joint meetings of their groups and the City Council. Councilmembers agreed to meet with them for one - half -hour sessions during the Mayor's Forum on Saturday, February 3, 1996. The meetings will begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Community Center. Council declared this meeting would be held, and ordered that it be properly posted. Councilmember Koppen returned at 6:10 p.m. 2. Polic .on Snowplowing of S dewall : Mayor Bastian asked for a memorandum regarding the City's policy on removing snow from sidewalks. He had not been present at the Council meeting when this matter was discussed in relation to a decision to remove snow from a trail along McKnight Road. He was concerned about residents being forced to walk in the roadway of White Bear Avenue. J. FUTURE TOPICS These items were continued. Other items which will be scheduled for upcoming workshops included the community survey, economic development and retention, and a quarterly report from the Community Center. K. CITY MANAGER 1 EVALUATION Discussion of this item began at 6:15 p.m. and continued until 6:50 p . m.. Action on the evaluation would be scheduled on the January 8, 1996 City Council meeting. L. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Bastian moved that the meeting be adjourned at 6 :50 p.m. Councilmember Allenspach seconded and the motion was approved unanimously. 1 0 a. MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday January 8, 1996 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 96 -1 GIRL SCOUT TROOP 621 PROVIDED A COLOR GUARD A CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 by Mayor Bastian. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C ROLL CALL: Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Marvin.C. Koppen, Councilmember George F. Rossbach, Councilmember D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. Minutes of Meeting 95 -28 (December 18, 1995) Present Present Present Present Present Councilmember Carlson moved to approve ,_the minutes of Mgeting No. 95 -28 _(December 18, 1995) as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all CITY CLERK LUCILLE AURELIUS ADMINISTERED THE OATH OF OFFICE TO COUNCILMEMBERS DALE CARLSON AND GEORGE ROSSBACH. E . APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended:, L -1 White Bear Avenue Improvements L -2 Mayor's Update Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all EA.. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS NONE 1 N F . CONSENT. AGENDA: Councilmember Carlson moved_.seconded b: the Consent „Agenda.., Items F -1, thru F- I 1. :Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 88,169.98 $ 809034.61 $ 142 $ 181 $ 152,035.65 $ 619713.33 $ 82,5.52 $ 7959918.22 PAYROLL: $ 11 $ 17,672.45 $ 27,354.15 $ 260,641.32 $ 47 $ 260,798.84 15,758.71 $ 641,500.77 $1,437,418.99 Dunci l member Koppen ayes - a11, to approve is recommended. Checks #5976 - #5990 Dated 12 -7 -95 thru 12 -13 -95 Checks #23012 #23132 Dated 12 -19 -95 Checks #5991 - #6005 :Dated 12 -14 -95 thru 12 -19 -95 Checks #23141 - #23246 Dated 12 -26 -95 Checks #6006 #6028 Dated 12 -21,95 thru 12 -29 -95 Checks #23253 - #23343 Dated 1 -2 -96 for period 12 (Dec. 1995) Checks #23262 #23345 Dated 1 -2 -96 for period 14 (Jan. 1996) Total Accounts.Payable Sergeants Union Merit Payroll Checks Dated 12 -14 -95 Metro Supervisors Union Merit Payroll Checks - Dated 12 -14 -95 Non -Union Merit Payroll Checks Dated 12 -14 -95 Payroll Checks Dated 12 -15 -95 Payroll Deduction Checks #49578 thru #49590 - Dated 1.2 -15 -95 Payroll Checks Dated 12 -29 -95 Payroll Deduction Checks #49820 thru #49826 - Dated 12 -29 -95 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 2. Budget Changes - Finance Department Authorized revision of the Finance Department 1995 and 1996 Budgets as follows: a) 1995 Budget increased by a X1,000 transfer from the Contingency Account to finance an increase in annual audit costs. b) 1996 Budget decreased by a $1,000 transfer to the Contingence Account to finance a decrease in annual audit costs. c) 1996 Budget increased by $2,815 transfer from the Contingency Account to finance payroll software modifications. 2 1 -8 -96 I 3. Tax Forfeit Land Transfer Program (3085 Highway 61) J Authorized staff to complete the sale of land the City obt.ai ned through tax forfeiture to Mary Bohnen of Sparkle Auto, the adjacent property owner, subject to Ramsey County combining' it to the property located at 3085 tl Highway 61 North. ' 4. Conditional Use Permit Review - Lakeview Lutheran Church (1194 County Road C) Reviewed and approved for renewal the Conditional Use Permit for Lakeview Lutheran Church at 1194 County Road C. The CUP will be reviewed again June 1, 1996. 5. Amber Hills Third Addition Final Plat Approved the Amber Hi 11 s Thi rd Addi ti on final pl at , subject to the devel oper recording the deed restrictions about the pipeline setback and the wetland buffer easements with the final plat. 6. Contract for Police Services - Landfall Reviewed and approved the 1996 Contract for Police Services between the City of Maplewood and Landfall. 7. Park and Recreation Commission Vacancy and Appointment Accepted with regret the resignation of Cathy Tol l efson from the Park and Recreation Commission and directed staff to advertise for applicants. Re- appointed Peter Fischer, Carolyn Peterson and Craig Brannon, whose terms expired December 31, 1995, to new three -year terms on the Maplewood Park and Recreation Commission. 8. Nature Center Donation Accepted with thanks a donation of $225 from Robert and Carolyn Odegard to be used for Nature Center Capital Improvements, and directed staff to credit it to Account 403 - 814 - 316 -4720. 9. Planning Commission and Community Design Review Board Reappointments Re- appointed Dave Kopesky, Lorraine Fischer and Les Axdahl to new three -year terms on the Maplewood Planning Commission. Re- appointed Marie Robinson and Ananth Vidyashankar to new two -year terms on the Maplewood Community Design Review Board. 10. Human Relations Commission Reappointments Re- appointed Gordon Heininger and Regina Laroche- Theune to new three -year terms on the Maplewood Human Relations Commission. 3 1 -8 -96 11 Police Civil Service Commission Reappointments Re -a ointed Steven Gunn to a new three -year term on the Maplewood Police pp Civil Service Commission. 12. Ambulance Bill Cancellation Authorized cancelling the remaining ambulance bill balance of 5256.66 for Louis E. Lorenzi, 13. Manager' Evaluation Accepted the City Manager's 1995 performance evaluation as presented by Councilmembers Allenspach and Koppen, and approved the award of $3,900 in merit pay. G. I PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7 :00 P.M. (7 :11 P.M.): TH61 North of Beam - Water Main, Project 95 -17 a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to install a 12 -inch water main and appurtenances along the east side of Highway 61 from Beam Avenue to County Road D. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings. d. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Mr. John Dittrich Tom Mogren, representing Countryview Golf Course (Golf Shop, Golf Course and adjoining house against.) Howard Lactorin spoke for himself and his brother Ray (in favor) Keith Venburg, Venburg Tire (in favor) f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoDtion: 96 -1 -1 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING - PROJECT 95 -17 WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of TH61 North of Beam Avenue Water Main, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly, held on January 8, 1996 and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; 4 1 -8 -96 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct TH61 North of Beam Avenue Water Main, City Project 95 -17, as described in the notice of hearing thereof, and orders the same to be made. 2. The City Engineer is designated. Engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 3. The Finance Director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project.- Seconded by Councilmember. Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Allenspach,'Carlson, Koppen Nays - Councilmember Rossbach H. AWARD OF BIDS NONE I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 10 Holiday Station Store (Lower Afton and McKnight Roads) Land Use Plan Change (CO to BC) Zoning Map Change (CO to BC) Code Change (Minor Motor Fuel Stations, Conditional Use Permit a. Manager McGuire stated the applicant requested this item be rescheduled to the January 22, 1996 Council Meeting. b. Mayor Bastian moved to reschedule_Ho,; Holidayy Station Store's request to January 22, 1996. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 2. Contract for EMS Medical Director a. Manager McGuire stated staff requested this item be tabled. b. Mayor Bastian moved to table this item until further information is Present Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all J NEW BUSINESS 1. Ice Arena Task Force Report a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 5 1 -8 -96 b. M ayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the ' Counci 1 regarding this matter. The following were heard: Craig Wal dron, City Ma nager, City .of Oakdale Rich McNamara Assistant Ci Manager,, City of Oakdale Denny Schutz, 790 Dorland c . Councilmember Rossbach moved to authorize execution o,f a..ioint powers agreement with the Ci of Oakdale and Independent School District 622 for construction and oper�.ati an of indoor ice facilities at Tartan Hi Qh School. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 2. Organized Collection of Refuse a Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following was heard: Craig.Waldron, City Manager, City of Oakdale c. Mayor Bastian moved totable this item to the February 12, 1996 meeting Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 3. Charitable Gambling Requests - First Quarter 1996 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Assistant Manager Dawson presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following was heard: Mary Moen, Presentation Church d. Councilmember Carlson moved to place the Char. itabl_.Gam_bl,ng Policies on a future Council /Manager meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes all e. Councilmember Carlson moved to app rove the requ of Lutheran Social Service of Minnesota ,_ ($3,,300) for Charitable Gambling Funds to assist with the Share -A -Home program. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all f. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the request of ISD 622 ($700) for Charitable Gambling Funds for the North High School's Multicultural Group, Shades of Youth to present a play, "According to Coyote ". Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 6 1 -8 -96 g. Counci l member Carl son moved , to approve the request of Presentation o f Mary School ( $5 , 000) for "Charitable Gambli Funds for_ the purchase of two additional Macintosh Computers with CD -ROM drives to r expand the ■■��1 r r.lr■��r r.■_■rr■- r�r-■I■I■Yr��r�rrr_ Ir.,�. r�lr��lrlri Irr�l��r rrr� school's access to the.Internet Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Carl son, Rossbach Nays - Councilmember Koppen Abstain - Mayor Bastian he Councilmember Carlson moved to.approve the request of City of Maplewood - - ■�■�I`�I�■ r■r ■�I 1 I I�I�III■ill�il I Ilri■rw r�l I�r�■I Emerg y Nana nt ($1,600) for Charitable Gambl Funds for the P urchase of six conference tabl fo the public meeting area in- the Publ i c , Works, Bui 1 di ng_ _Igll _ ■ �I��I� ■I��I�ir�� Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all i . Councilmember Carlson moved to a approve the r request l of Ci _y of Maplewood Recreation Division ($3,700) for Charitable Gambl i n Funds for portable- electronic 'scoreboards for outh basketball youth volleyball and s ecial eventst 36 chest protectors for youth softball and 40 pairs of safety glasses for vouch fl oor hockey. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 4. Food and Food Handlers Code Amendment a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specif of the report . C. Councilmember Koppen moved to.approve (as first reading of an ordinance amendi the current regulations for food establishments. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 5. Request to Use Open Space a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: Don Fratto, representing the Lions Club Clarence Haider, Plant Sale Chairperson c. Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the request of the ,North Maplewood Lions and Lioness Clubs to ,■I use the Open Space at Frost and English for r �rl -- r���Ir•r r�rr r i r their annual plant sale from May 8 through May 112, 1996. r per I .��r ■ I I��A I� Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 7 fl •. 6. 1996. Appointments a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian moved to appoint Patri ck Kel l y of Banni gan & Kell City Attorney at .$80 /hr for civil 1,, matters and $90 /hr, , for, 1 i ti gati on . Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all c. Councilmember Carlson moved to appoint, Martin Costello. of Hughes & Costello as Prosecuting Attorney with a monthl .ex enses ca of $5000 Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all d. Mayor Bastian moved to appoint Councilmember Sherry A1lenspach�an_d City Manager Mike McGuire to represent Maplewood at the Municipal Legislative Commission. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes all e. Mayor Bastian moved to appoint Councilmember George Rossbach to represent Maplewood at the Ramsey Co_ unt_y__League of Local Government , with Councilmember Dale Carlson as. Alternate. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen f Mayor Bastian moved to appoint Mayo on the Cable Commission with Councilm( Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach g. Mayor Bastian moved to appoint Counci Allenspach to represent Maplewood a' Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all Bastian to re per Dale Carlsc Ayes - all on e. Rossbach and Sherr Ayes - all h. Mayor Bastian moved to appoint Councilmember Mary Koppen and Assistant City Manager Craig Dawson to represent Map lewood at the Suburban Rate Authority. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 1 . Mayor Bastian moved to designate he Maplewood Rev �as. the official newspaper for Maplewood, Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all j. Mayor Bastian moved to appoint Councilmember Sherry, A1lenspach as Ac_.ting M ayor• Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes all 8 1 -8 -96 k. Mayor Bastian moved to appoi Carlson to represent Maplew Advice Board, Seconded by Councilmember Koppen 1. Counci 1 member Rossbach move( Map_l ewood' - s „ representativE with Communi tv Deve1 oDment D Seconded by Mayor Bastian ouncilmembers Geor at. the St. Ayes all uurk . . Ayes - al as ce m. Councilmember Rossbach moved to , appoint_ Mayor Gary Bast an Public Safety Director Ken Collins to represent Ma lewood at The Partnershi . Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes all n. Mayor Bastian moved..to appoint Councilmember Mary KoDDen to repr. Maplewood at the Metro East Development Partnershi with Comm Development Director Melinda „Coleman as Alternate. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes all 7. CDBG /Home Priorities a Manager McGuire presented the staff report. ,b. Director of Community Development Coleman and Assistant Manager Dawson presented the specifics of the report. c. Councilmember Carlson introduced the fol l ow nq Resolution_ an_d_moved its adoption 96 -01 -02 A RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING PRIORITIES IN A COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SURVEY REQUESTED BY RAMSEY COUNTY WHEREAS, Ramsey County has requested response to a community and economic development survey for purposes of planning activities to be funded in the federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME) programs during the next fiscal year; and WHEREAS, Ramsey has requested that a resolution be adopted if the Maplewood City Council were involved in identification of local or County priorities for these programs; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council did consider priorities that City staff had suggested, _ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council determines that, )ssDacn ana ua i e Treatment PI an 9 1 -8 -96 The following items are priorities within Maplewood that the City should pursue: 1. Rehabilitation of owner - occupied housing 2. Rehabilitation of rental housing 30 Removal of dilapidated structures. 40 HOME. program services 5. Establishment of a special assessment loan fund In order of priority, Ramsey County should address the following items of County -wide importance: 1. Neighborhood revitalization 2. Infrastructure improvements 3. Provision of new /expanded social services 4. Rehabilitation of rental property 5. Employment opportunities support Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 8. Request from North St. Paul - Highway 36 Pedestrian Bridge a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Assistant Manager Dawson presented the specifics of the report. .c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. 1 d. Councilmember Carlson moved to send .'a letter of.support for the North St. Paul application for ISTEA funding to build a pedestrian bridge over Highway 36 n .ear . Margaret ,Street and directed that this support be communicated to the Transportation Advisor Board (TAB) of the Metropol i tan. . Council Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS NOME L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. White Bear Avenue Improvements a. Councilmember Carlson suggested an effort be made to improve the aesthetics in the Maplewood Mall area when White Bear Avenue is improved. b. Councilmember Carlson suggested contact with St. Paul regarding their proposed plans for White Bear Avenue. 10 1 -8 -96 C. Councilmember Koppen moved to refer thi matter to the Community Desi n Review Board and 0. contact St Paul as to their Tans for landsca i:n White Bear. Avenue sout of Lar enteur wi th di scussion to include street lighting. landscing and other amenties. aping _i��irrrrii r,rrrr�r_r,rr�r i Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes all 2. Mayor's Update a. Mayor Bastian stated he had received calls regarding n school district g g boundary changes, especially the elementary schools. There will be a district meeting January 9., 1996 at .7: P.M at the Maplewood Middle School. b. The Partnership received a grant to provide community services within the area; also a Juvenile grant to help juvenile offenders. C. Recommendation Partnership parade be in Maplewood. It is still valued. d. Congressional City Conferences will be in March. e. Brochures and tapes for the National League of Cities Conference are available if anyone would like to hear them. f. Director of Public Safety has forwarded a letter of support for tobacco compliance. g. There was a question of whethe . Ma 1 ewood residents can join St . Paul p Parks and Recreation events - they cannot. h.lG A letter has been received from the Chain of Lakes Water Project. i . An invitation has been received for two eo 1 e ($30.) to attend the P P Gladstone Installation dinner on January 19, 1996. j. The Mayor's Forum on Saturday, January 6, 1996 - "Where TIF can be used, regarding playground equipment." M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS NONE N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING 9:24 P.M. Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk 11 1 -8 -96 �1 AGENDA REPORT TOO City Mana r .FROM: Finance Director o RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: January 16, 1996 AGENDA NO. F -1 Attached is a listing of paid bills f inf purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS P AYABLE: $12,812.82 Checks #6029 thru #6031 dated 12 -29 -95 for period 12 (December, 1995) $89,823.56 Checks #23381thru #23456 dated 1 -9 -96 for period 12 (December, 1995) $83,459.12 Checks #6032 diru #6041 dated 1 -2 -96 diru 1 -3 -96 for period 14 (January,, 1996 ) $44,189.17 Checks #23379 thru #23453 dated 1 -9 -96 for period 14 (January, 1996) $103,320.69 Checks #6045 thru #6047 dated 1 -4 -96 thru 1 -5 -96 for period 12 (December, 1995 $64 Checks #23465 thru #23591 dated 1 -16 -96 for period 12 (December, 1995) $256,368.63 Checks #6042 thru #6057 dated 1 -4 -96 thru 1 -10 -96 for period 14 (January, 1996) $6 1 8 210.17 C,'hecks #23466 thru 23592 dated 1 -16 -96 for period 14 (January, 1996) $715,335.52 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: - $305,928.91 Payroll Checks dated 1 -12 -96 $48, 649.83 Payroll Deduction check #50939 thru #50052 dated 1 -12 -96 $354,578.74 Total Payroll S i U S i d , GRAND TOT Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. rb Attachments P:BFINANCEtWRAGNSAPPRCU &JAN 6 C'UT' C.)F F : A C.3* E: 1 7 VOUCHI: I. F%KRIOD :1.2 2 4 C.'o 1-1 E C K C I E'C K VENDOR ITE.rl ITEM Cl- -I EC' K 5 6 DATTE NUMBEIR % DE%1:)C%1-R I P*T* 1011 IYIt 7 6029 :1.2/29/9zo 190400 DE: PT OF FIATURAL RE:SO ORSES Dl%lR' FEEKS PAYABL 1� 587. 00 57 . 00 8 10 6 0 -� C) 2 2 5 - 0 1::-(: F-AYAIRLSK T -, r i::*i.z -E % STAT E.- fikl ..JC' F.-.) 712.00 13 14 6031 12/29/95 541400 V1114-1. ESTATE* 'I*FZE:-'ASLJFZE:*F*%* MOTOR VE••1 LIC FEES^ PAYABLE 51 3. 82 11 L 11 j 513 . f: 2 15 1 2,3381 01/09/96 T f. E: T Z, JAIAE-- RET UND 3 'WORAM 2B .. 0 0 28 . 00 --16 17 18 19 23-382 01/09/96 BOLLMANN., M1C.'PHELLE: FZE*-*F- PROG )RAlyl - 12. , - .0 0 ---- 28. 00 --20 21 ;!2 23383 01/09/96 R., .... PI C) A11 28.,00 28.. 00 23 2 3 3 (5: 4 01/09/96 r I E A R'1%3". ,:YAP! FZEFUND PROGRAM 2B. 00 28 N 00 2Y 28 0 i5 VI 1 T H 0 1.00 . 0 0 0 0 0 29 .301 23386 01 /09/96 1.01 N K E PAUL REFUND l.Jt::. Pri T A Cp CT 9 515 4 5 4 It P. 6 3 0 486.30 31 32 23388 01/09/96 01046 5 A T T PACAR: HRS 62.82 62.82 3, 3 Elkv" 01/09/96 010466 A T & T J. 15 . cif} :L '.5 ..:3 0 36 37 38 23390 01/09/96 0:1.0470 A T & T W 11: Z EEL EK S 1% %) 11:xi : - I R V I C.". EEC CE:I ... I ... ULoAR C%I-V%d--ZC'I: 49. 58 39 40 r • C E� -LULAR F CHARGE 21. 7 8 .("E L.I ... ULAR PHONE- U13E AO.. 22.42 ........ C I ... UL.Al I ]; E I :z F +1114E ( i Eo 441 4b A C 23,7 0 -5 202 49.. 150 % ACCOUNT 02337202 54.45 4 7 48 AC%rC%eC)UI%H* 02-3,*. 5 57 2 0'2� 21. 7 0 49 -OUNT 0 2 4 sic: I 2,*-.v) AC%C'4- 104.25 ACCOUNT 024E.-9 1 69 92.61 52 02640019 46.32 53 •CC'-OUN• 02788941 1 J. 1%5 . 9 0 747..26 54 5b -iS .... .. U I PIvIE. 4 100.0. 1.00.09 P6 1�7 2 Z-5 3 9 2 01 /09/96 01 W571,05 AC%PE:.* HARDWARE SUPPLI E."S ZY A F 11TO F -,"o . C L .. 2 . 24 519 -%I TE lo%IAI%4('I -- MATIER 1AL. -- :1-22.10 -- -- - - _ _. __. 1 60 11:31, J PPL f E 143% .... JAN I TOR I At.. 3 6%-5 ) 0 2 507.44 E;., 01/0 9/96 q . 4c .. 0 01 i-wvr r: 4"Tr 1,200.� 1. --- --- - ,200..00 _��. +� 2 %-S 9 4 01/09/96 030660 C % E � C % ANIMAL C0NT.I:Z-C.)L S . . 8 p ERVI I FIC A N 1'. 1`1 A L I . CONTROL SEK RVI CE - E' ; 6 2 0:1. 6b "1 C -F Al-%I;ClifAL FMROF E F v I Cr E. %0, 9 2:` 4.. 2 0 1, 786.21. 69 70 2339'%* 01/09/9 6 ........... .. 0311.00 V Al::'I:*-"1::'AI:ZA,INI(*4�-r--- F-1 ... 1. J E %) W A 113" 111: %) 101 .. 9 B. 71 7 2 W AS F I EKS J-9.12 121.:10 � _ � 7� .23396 01/09/96 - - 0409 V,5 ARNAI ... S AUTC) % R 1 F I R & 036. 1.2 75 - m r:. r j**i x rk 1Y. Mki .1. V1 I / V M N A U L.. t:. Z., J. V . 6 i L 13 11;1';1 r4 �9 LJ ti •��, t f H. :r T'Y O F , MAPL.EWOOD f 1 ! 01 11-17 �` /t.:! IE : :t'.; K RE::C�.i:" TT: ::1 - - -- __ _ __ .. - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - -- - - i F't: R r'�•rER :I: C.) 12 3 is h .... �._. . � ... _..._ ...,_ _. ...... . .... �,. rl••I.1•�/ .. . ...._.. _.. _.. .. ,_.._ _ . ... -.. __.. .._ _.___._....,._. _....._..._. _.,, ...._ ,_. _. __. _......._ .._._ .. .. ..., _ .. . .._ ...._. ..._. _...._....� -.._ ... .. __.... - _._... __.... .. ..._...�.. _._ _. -- _. ._w..,. _. ... ._..� , ......... .« _ ___.. wrw� «._- _._.....__._ -._. _ ._ _._...._�- .___ _.. _..._. _ _....._..._ _..._,.______._._._..._.__.._. _.__.__..._.__.._.... .. -. _._.__..__._.._.__..____� _._ ,_.__.__._..__ _.____. , 4 w; c:.a• C % K .. VE::1� DOF VE::i•`IT t;.iF .T. T'r:: M 6 4 l� UIVIE -I : ::rz DA T I I�il.11�IB IR i�lAMEE DI F <1 P T IO I .. � � til l! I T A. lM.NJI � . 9 �► P ( 225 9 0 0 :I. /0 060265 B n R a Cr ., ..» NS,:):1. (:::E ::l;I'T'E::S, PI•:OCyEtAETt UP PL.. ..>, n 531 N 24 ..) n 53 n 24 1, 10 ' ;y •;v •;v {� f,� �..,. 3 . r 01/0 �/ f�6 00 ,{ -�' r r�S •S ..• ... N „• ..• .�. T: (`�t.rE•d1�I11' N ,a t..l�,l. »T� T DEE >r R Till.- NT .. 1.S •` •» - r•S � .. Y - - »{,`. II *I., »I...i...AF E::CII. S t.,t:�111 It:lD I T 11 :..,.) ;325 vti -- ..•••- 32 _.�.V ...: 63 13 1 1;> 2� ti400 O l /09/96 1 DUI L..z)E : :C Ci CSQUARE:: M AINTENANC E MA "R I A L.. 4 16 13 MAINTENANCE:.' MAT'I ERI A1...S 9 . , � 7 1. � y N 919.. 1,1 i!i 1 J _ - 23 40 �y j 'y - y , j 0 :1. /4��J' / S:? ..._ / �y «� /'� :t. :�'1�5! f 'S+� {' q (j r t� �y 'y r •�• q �» C. N l.� N .1. n j: }l.�i V r:. 1 {�+: I t�.l. h`t {h GROUP TRAVEL A p r 1 F�1"1�1::.1... & 1 {.�. �t.l. �l� 2.525.00 j : 9 ` 525 �L.• • ?O , 21 17 340 y 01. /09/96 • :t.1.0 90 CAP 1: T•t:ll... r�l.1X:�lf: EER %S T'r�I�II� � C Olvl1 'ANY #:yt.lr:1 ... 1: r::::% ..» 01- !° IC** 1::: 9.07 9 N 0 7 ` 2 18 19 23404 01. /f� { r�196 1.10460 t.r>�I:''E :.F PZE« E t...t.l t"'1•ACAKS) t.�h• t' A I. «�::I� OOD ��AITIS. .Y CO LOW •i: htT'I.. t'+,1~'.,. }T� LOAN :I. p f�()f� N f�f7 - .l p faf�fy N f�4) 24 15 ?i 2'% v , TO 5 01. / ,} �/ 6 11 53 1.) .» .. C. rl••11::.IYIt.A N Tr���' L t..t�I-+.1 C. RAT• 1. *l I 7 t.rl •li...I�I .l: t.rAt ».,:y ,�:.1 .,.) n f?q 213.00 28 2_ ' 29 2., «..� f'''• /L0 0.1- /�. 9 /'� 6 ; 1. �. t COL.i. 11 If:) q ! {i::.i�Ei IE:.T'i-'I � n T�EtiAVE:.1... & *T'I'',A.i. i�i.i NGJ .L ,� >r�,�` a c�)f� :!. p a�.�:'. n E)r�l 30 31 24 25 23 407 01. /f ?� /96 190044 DE- BIi. »�:AN ., JUDY �Jt:TII {.:t...E::. AI._I..t.aUJtlt�lt�l::. - - -- - 11.44 - :1..i.., 4r.�l - _ 32 33 ?; 2%`%'40 x 0:1. /09/96 240 :1.50 E::L..C)lyiORE :. fit: L)AT I C. VIDESE FOR RE::113A. t...E:: 1 5 1 . 3 9 :t 51.39 <<, 234:1.0 01. /09/96 270200 F L..EX :I: �C {E..:E F" I l� TE 7•[301... CO. MA 3:1�iT'I:: hlANCAE MATE i� :1: AL.. 5 5 08 5 5 f } #:3 318 30 31 2 34 :L :1. 0 /+J_ /_1§ 00rzi00 & K "BE::F+:V C;i:::f:3 l.1hI:CFORMS fir. - C;l...CIT'H:lNE) 61 . 82 - - 41 Ul__l 1. i "t:II- M' i & cI ... o1 :i.l`l0% 60..20 42 � 33 Fl U 1 I i ' t 11•� iYlr� � i``rl t'�'T 11: !<Ity .� .w w•. Y . . _ _... 44 14 1 1.11�1-I F C1F�1�1{ i C:I...t:l'T'I.1:l:141tti :'.:!. •• .i. { 45 1.11 X1:1 FT)I�tii IE & t ;l.. OT'i•• T 14(*.") ' 3 61 N { : y 46 36 U 1 11 F 0 011 %3 & CL OT H :I: %1 {7 60.20 47 37 l.11kl,l.I °' {.IC iYI# { M. T I�•IIF1(.; -- - - - - -- 39. � 49 a� 1JI I :C i --'t�t'zIY1;:3 C�i...t: *ri•1:t 11( 2 1. N 1. � icy 6 . 30 50 51 3` 1 do 234 01/09 : 0 :L �.) Cy f } t:; l : ::Itiil::.!• ` •• OFT-* - • •` ::• ::• :•• � » • �t"tl.. t..1 i I. t.rl... I 1 tit. ..at.. T r.` � .:• � • • • :• c:` .... ;y ,., Y _..._...___. _......._ _.._ ........_.__ ,a ..11 1 1....L E..,.) l ::t.,l.! :I: i 1 II:1�!'T' _ __w_ f .:, _ � _ � - �,�..r .. f. fa 53 1 41 42 c il.11 "'F'L...1. E , c l )% .... E:.t:)ll.I. L 'I - elE N 'T 1. 1 159 •• 7 5 585.75 54 55 4.1 23 01./09 301.950 - -- -� w tyl: :.l�lt�.l:tr�` L. • T.1.1.4E «. % s`E: V N /T•Y!' F:.#y :1 N'T' i... C';i~..i F"AI &. 11AIFI T./ E 1.1.1.tl...E' - - - -- 7:5 N 4 57 4,, f :i l.J 't::'i...:i: E ::# : a .... vl : ::i••11: C✓L..E:: i#:3 ., # :i , 5s 4r ' c%tjF 3: : I: : - I... :c .... vl : : :i'11: C`.I...E: w.. ___w_ .w__�_ ..__..._ 4s _ _ i Ic I:• t.�i'% { %I:: - I : ;.. - r ( -%E:. __- w . 169.21 ) y _.W ww - .1. p L" ,v .) N ��f� _ 61 • 41t 2 341. 1. f� 1. /09 <• T. �';t�lYil�� 1'1! ! ` •t:` .... ; :)1.11=�'!�='l...1:1:.,.) 'lll : ::I •i :r C l._1 : : � 63 2 '' ' n ,.i,ti 65 R i50 �a.a!"•i"`L..:1:I: : : { ..» �,�E I.: 2.44 66 .r E�'t�lt't 'T' 328 •.� N 67 f,8 15� 69 5s `. 1. .4 5 01/09 x 1.01.00 GA ...Tll : ::1 %1 %yT'AR RAl"1 %'3lH:Y CIO I... OW I NT'E:TU::IS'T' I ... 0A14! 1. „ 000.. 1. 5 1,000.15 70 � 71 51 5 Z . } f''.• .i. 6 O.E. /09 / 96 - 31.06 [:J l.! �•' I I::. I• , DT {) I" {.} {:)A .. _ _.__ -_ _..._ - --- --- - - - -• - -- l... •---- + -- - - f - p� - - ;,I- ti- - - ti -- -- • - - - -_ __. _. -.. __-_. _ -- ---- -•-- -- h lt:��. :t. t � ,. 1',l: ::C,YCrt.» 1: Fl ,.Y •--- '- _ ._ _ _.....__ -_ :I. *x) ., ,.)f� E N 69 - - - -- - • � r t.y . -_ - --- -- - :!. c�) q ..),� #:� N >�) r 73 + 74 ' :.. 34 ,�' 01. /09 /96 .:� 1. fj8 50 • t. l�t.Y�Jl::.h;ltilYli: »I`IT' 'T'I•ti�1.1.1• l,I. NG , }I: 'RV {.:E:. 'Th+ AVE «I... �: 'Thy A I. II I NG 50 . 00 0 0, 75 .I. � ! N 76 Il `'' j VO1. C1--IE E:: Cf:I :'f' Y OF" I1APL•E :M0 1 :' ' 3 1 1 : 17 t.l1.!t..I "!I: » I•i /t.rI--Il t. « RE . J • i c -.IF : :C -: I{ C:F•IE ::( K VE ::hlDOR VE1. t)t 0-1 :t: TE : :IY! :I:'T'E ::IY! C'HE::C* K 1%1(J 1.B1: :.!'l DAT"I::. DI:. : 014 - - -- - _ AIYIO(.11 -�� AIVIOl.lN"1• 4 ' i ( 2 341 9 01 /0 Y •Y It 390 .:. ' 0 {; '+ :1: tc I t: F•i'T D :I: I :EM «C _, 1 i' It.r „ { ' {:'• «.. Y .: }1.1F=`�� L« :I: E::,.:' �'f4�4 w �l�f `} 'Y 4 7 00 �.. w dill 11 � 10 23422. 01/09/96 510450 t' AF:'I. «1: : :Wt (3D AUTO BODY RET:'A l R & IYiA l'.I -, I'T' /V1 :: :1••1:1: (:'.I._ I: :-* V---------- __._- _..__------ __._ -__ 1.9 2.3 :1.92.. ►a � 12, 2 . . . .. 01 /09/.`:6 .. ;t 1.17; 0 P IAL4 ! C)I -, i ., I EKFIhIEK t'F•! ;:i1. 1I��'r�'L..:I: E ::�:a �"E ::I••I I: C:L..E :: 1 �4 i w 66 �. • ti:> w } { {} 161 14 1 =� 2uj 17 23 42 4 01/ 09/96 5 4:1.4 40 11.L 4IA w {a•i A T EK •T F�1::.�1f l.11'4f: »F+; S TAX :it.t!'R�'�1�C 1 "'�-�1... w l ; ,625.1.0 7 ., 625 .. :1.0 ^' � 181 191 7 t:�.. } t:�t "a '�I _i_/0 9 ; �r:} M� f 1t I " i.�I' t.��..1•'1 q :t. l'!C. _ 1' f F' .t. I'ti r.Y: I I�1 f " ! f'4 �l .t. t..� T � - - G} 5 a 00 650-00 j•,i 201 21 i 2342 0 1/ 0 9/ 96 6 Irl i.11 �! :I: t:: ;I: t...:l: "T'1::: C w i L11 1: I : «« '�1E :F•! :{: t ".1...1:: ; i 1. ti i ..1.1. i..; `�2I i i1.11:'F�'L.. a: E "� Vl...i••I :k C1..l:': 308 ' -i' -- - - -- 62 :1..3 8 2,5428 O 1 /09/96 620500 I41.1 i :1: Cr 1: All ` .:i WARl::-11T:JI.I F-'R0(3FZAIl ;alai: :'I::'l ... 1:1 :: i 238.. 57 `y;: 8 '• 3 `' ' :.,. }r4,, »cY �:L /09/96 } } .:i. f :T 1 NORTHERN lF=. BFI i' F t�T i : E'' • • AMBULANCE VENTS c�} {�{ (� w � , } , 990 ..00 : 28 1c'1 - 15 01/09/96 711500 1 °'I'-lt3'T'0 'Tt:l [ :,t:l i '!••it:l'TO D VI : ::I...OF' :i: FIG 20 ..3 y 5 20. i cy 'T' I ,, �0 2 343 2 �+`�«:, i 01 /09 / { j 6 71 1.:1. PLAZA :C REK AND w iE :T-,V 1. CfE :: 11 RE 4 �'>�i E R' & 1'�It�`1:l: N T /�E::I41 C:L••I::: 72. �2 w 9 7 ,;� ; }4; : ;I..�t)' '"" �a �. �. ;� 1 °'1:1 «�11� t:rF�lE i�tit:ll.,•I : ::' GEM l� :t: R MA 1: N T / VI: 11:1: t:'rl. E 1. x'28 ., 1 5 1 5 r4X 4 C. Akt / CL. A %S%• a .i t : g : 1.9 7 « 0_0 - - - -__ _ :1.995 ':: 4 f4 t:%4f1Xt /(:1 fa::� :l: t:: -- _ -- - -- - -20 22. 7:71:i .. 9 .) ,...�. }x`43 4 01/09/96 �'{4 :1..00 RA 1l�IlF OW 1=• 0(33 {a l � I'�t:li:,:i�,a�lYl .: }l.Jl'� 1 � l...:I: I :,� 66 �} 1,66 )(j ' L•.:1: JAI - 1: TOR 1 AL 5,52 ? 1..11 J.) auI �:.,. }f•4.y:.�.1. /) { / { '} 11 }( FtltlYl:.)L.. i.;t.�Llttil'!'Y F�E:..I.PrtBL1ltiiE:. IYI .l.l... lhl ta - 'r' hlt "!' I.t.�t::.. 1. M �..:l. » {,ti .. • �' .;.. 1 w (�.:� q 2,. 34, 0 1/09/ 96 7803 I C.3* 'T (3F• F•' .1• t•.L•• 1: 1W)DI .. T',a 1 1 1 4C .. SUF•`1-•'l ... 11 ...a "•• ()F I•-' 1 C EK 90 . 22 .• }LJ i L •I, E••. OF''F'' 1 t•:I::. 52.. �( 23-4,37 :1. /09/96 /'t3�} { r {•t C �f ..� : K. � A l 1 S ...I.IJ[• 1D .i RI :. :C%r T' • {`ti K • { K Y Y . - {•'� I'1.I..: }t..!" I...l...A 11�:t.�US t..CJ! II It. D 3: T .E 1:...:} ,f • •;Y 443 w 1...} 4 u! F'Ftit.��:lt't�1 S ` t E {•7 - __. -..... __ -•--- ._._�_._.__._.____.__.- - -- - -- - t _� ": ?- --- ._..,_.._______ 16 4 I:'I t:at:,I:�'1Crl {:xl.1N'I'L..:I:E ::� :y . �' s' 6: 5; ;. ni: I mx - « « -. ... I��t:it "RAlY! ::�l �l::'F�'L..:I: E ::f :i r w #: 3 r� 1 29.64 722..12 23z1:: �:i 01/09/96 790 ;:iC::I+:I: ::k ::hl 'f•E::t::l •! PROGRAM t L�l:='r='L..:I: I:::f :i :t. ;:s�+... () :l.: i�. w {fit} 234 .I./09/96 800 . ,.,1. I .I...YI: :. - I 1•••� 10 T :1. t..ta p F�It., w ?:il.11:'!;:'t...:1:1: :::} .« l;..C�1.1':1:1��'I'II : : :i-!'T' 'c } ..:y,�' Il . C i I 1 t r �' "1•Y OF ITIAPLAN 1� �1til." 4 ` 01, /U�y�' ; } :{.:f. H 1. 7 _ - __._ vt• uc%I••lt : :a � /t:a••ff : :a:I� I+;l. :ai.l.; :i "Y 1 1=+: _ _ __ _ _..._ _ __ .__.... _ .. __ . . I l:: (JR P E:: WI: Ca lf} :1.2 i f !3 2 c.f!••I t•:.t4 C, I•• IE: :t.rl.E:.ttitZt. :C�'E:!"i :t:'Y'E ::lYI CHECK � It 1JI1 R IR DATE 1*11J1'rlX {E !•� I�IAI'rit��. Et " " }t'` 'I FIT __.._ _ I.t•��•lr�a'T �tY $. 22v. 4 41 OJ. /09/96 t:33:r. ,50 5 '63'PEC" :C At...'Y'Y P-,'A D 1(3 �:il:: :RV :I: i E' REPAIR & t"rrl :i: hl'i'/RAD .10 77 .. 19 in . . - - - -- .. _.. __... •ti ::, :C l•+. l�i(11:1�1'T' /IRAD :C 0 � . ' C 7 i i . �:'.3 *12 01/09/96 t 40 5 t i'T' „ PAUL, „ CITY OF ZY0 :1: FIT Ucl E:: At C [ : :E:f" IE ::N*T' 02.... 2',54 ti i ., t�i� ;: ..1. � • 3 ., 64 5. :E :r. 13 15 23443 01• /0 9/ { ��}__ - - - -�� 84f x 0- I SM. PAUL t'4At r .r. �:.AL (. R % *_I L_ i. r : % .... r' .�:��.l �. r"'rYrr`' ! •Y' - - - - - - - -_- __- r3___ - - - -- - -- - -- ti P OI 'r ta. EQUI S % 20',5.. 88 *22 0 t.3t '19 23446 0 S 50 5 f :3t.lI - , IFZ AY PlU TO I ::*A • T% MA 1: FITI. 1%-IAN(:`.E- IIAT*r: : :r•;:1: Al... 1 60 .. 2 o 2' t }t.lr••'P!.•• T ES ..•. V EI•-11 Cfl.AK •• • 392 . .4 3 2 1 Wil 1Y1�1 :1: rtrrl hi�'1l�rt::t . - lYir�r'E�t�;; x1..: _ _� -„ t k� < .:I :r. Nt 2 26 2344,x' 0•!•/09/9c 8 603 0 i •� N .. f �� . F �'�i " ' !••I � I.!l�t:i:l: °t:3E+:lYl~y T C;E..t.) •t 1 : atilt J } �, �� } i fir} 4 1 23448 0 1• /09/96 8�.>,03 0 T . 111-_Z „ 1::*,. ��UI:: T1._Y CO „ 11A.1 i�! * 141 11 h1� :::l� :l: Al.- r� � �� � {� ,• .. ?3 -- V IA I I�t'T'E : :I%IAI , IC:E• MATERIAL- � -_ _---. _ :L6 6.1 4 -� i��a: i�i- �r: �t�l >rtii�r�;i��lYt��rl:.i�; :cr�c:. _ -_ � �1. 40 .. t:# . , a 7 �>> j''' .T ,� ,�..,. 449 0:1. /09/96. 861 0� I- : :1.•E .t a C :�J E'E :: t°;�t�3 l.lIYl�:�I:�:E "I. » . L.��: � �tr1�i� :�Y : C3� �� '' C � :a ' 36 i 23450 01/09/96 86:111.685 'Y•I••IC:IMAIJ. -A ., DW_1: D TRAVEI... & •Y'RA 1:1113: Iq(3 1. 9 3.9 1 5 37 1 2345 4 1. /C ? {�' {} {{�tt:3 :a l.litll. Vl°.'l• :c �'Y (IF M .0 l-ll~l iCl'Y't T RA V EL- 'Y'!•+;t� 1. !�I :I. hlta 50.0 ;:1 {� 41 1 42 ' 3� ...�} 43 234 ;r 4 { l / { G} �7' �.l.,.} •i • -y : {:� •',� •:. • ....S- r *� { •fir yp •� Al... a} �.l l !' �...r. f.« ..} t � 'i l'I .b 1 l.J l t .1. 1•'I y.. .t» 0 a ..}'•7 „ 14 5 -. {.•' {�ti •' :• I�l r DW .. ... ,.} 1 ..} �.. C:. �.} C CID.. ` ; :f .... �T l411'YTN :t: Al... 498. 707.36 ` 47 .. 23454 �:i�.3t�' °'1...:1:l:�f :a -•.• I�:t �l.l � :! 'l�rl: "!�!T 20 .. 013 - - .. } ,. C, -_ - - - ---_ - - - -- - -i49 01• /09 / {i 6 91.1.,: 5 V I: K 1111 l::L..I : t:�'I�t:r C 1 % -.Y wil.3F�'r�'1...:!: E x .... EQUIPMENT :E Y�'1'1�::Iti!'T' 95 .,69 1:1 1 ,5 „ 7 7 51 0 1 ,, .. , ., /'fir / 9 6 3. .•..} } 0 W 11...,, }! ! ,, WD ... I ... I All 1:: • t..�. ?lYll�ll: »1.4 .I. t.,�11.:. r•'l...IJtYIIL•.{ .!: l�tty .I: t�r:: }h•'k:.t.. "T .r. Cll�l 53 44 . . ��� . p j' . .... s C.'*,O IVIE:,R I C AL.. F- L1A.)VIB ,r M.; 1 I%I { :+F ::C , T :r 01 -! 1 5 5 ., 00 5a i . i:: t:3lYliYll :::t= :1 C I�•t. :I: I�t[ 1:11 i1 "'I : ::t:: :I: 0 111 - 4 55. '" 4;} 144 t : t:3lYI IYI i : :: I ►; t.� l ,r ]... F:' l,.,1,AVI 4 :l h110 :t: FIt: k:` E : C:'T' :t: t:1 fit _ a 2 0.; 00 - 57 p rrt.11Y E :t•,;c..I�1... r"'1... •� , FIG {:. �, •. �.. l.11lF- 1,1 It., 1 N,.}I r .L. Y 1, 0111 I COMPIER is f :'l... l.lrYtJ�; � 5$ 59 lip, :!: t ilt:! a: hi{ E CT:1 0 N 400.00- } � .. 2 456 01 /09/96 93 80 00 WIEAT'I••lE:SZ uJATC 111-1 n 1FICi „ } SE RV 1:CE:: 1�1(t3t' E.E. :r%l•Y' {y { • 1. 79 ... 9 { { . 1 9 r' 61 2 ,o . 63 64 ol 68 p 'S3 �64 70 71 " 5r - - _ - 73 74 � j i 75 _ , 76 E 11a 6 03 7 01/ 32 0'% 500 f71Rt.11..11"' 1••ll::Y- A.3 INC. p 1.99 F IRE :.M .I. U11 X: 1.11 ::. _ %.} •'){ _ _ - _ ._._ -- 1s JAhI1.IARY 1. 996 PREMIUM DUE: 5t: }9 a g r i W15 zo JANI.If 1RY 1996 F •RE M :t:1. M DUE 91.5.. 58 1: B ., 902 p 7 21 - 2 If , • 0 .. 8 10 3196 53 0100 IYi I CA 1::1••If3 1: f :l::: ZTr- t1 19 ! •'RE- 113:1.lIYI T ?1.11: :: 3, 30 �( zs if ANl.1AFtiY 1 996 PREMIUM 1:1.111 D1.1r:: 9 ti p ;5 2 :,. •. JA1ti11.1(1RY 1.996 i °RE "IYI :I: 1.1{Y! 1. f :l ., ��e�y"' p r r.3 :l. i - l�hll.lt1:+;'Y :1.996 PREMIUM 1�1.lI::. 1. „ {#:. : } t 2 4 - rti >i:; ., ., p �. t1h11.1r1 1. t'�) ADM 1" t :»1:» I)1.11::. x } } N :. �: 60 .. 4 �ti Y9 01 /03/9 1.801. D p 1:, p A p n I1 "It' � ^, 6040 01/03 "'.ti "'.x:1.1.4 MN IYI1.! (1.i�1l... LIF .I:hi�il.1l'4 = 1hli..i::. �JAIA If`�RY :1. { �96 PREMIUM Y�1.1E a+•'�2 p 04 39 JA14l1.1A 1.9 i °'I:Z *:IYt:i:l. M lL: 7 9 9 1.50 JJO JANUARY R 1 :t. 996 F�I : I �. M Al1.11° r• ,/y Y 2 ` 46 .. 94 'y 4;' J,j � •� 1. t :� p F l� I�:. 1, I�.. i x.1:31 41 60 0.1. /f. 3 6 50 .1.400 ITIAD .1. ,. }f: N 1~!t'•�T I CI1 l...l. F• i : :. ;1�t�l�I1 .I. �� �c�) 1•• {•zE..lY1:1.1.111 �f�1.1E:. �:. X34 4 .. c� 6 2 K ..) 4..66 i idy , 2%2537 9 01/0 D 0(:)l IYl : :: ! ,E ::F "1:11 ll� f�l• AD I:1 G% E :.,. }C SOW !• EC. "l' 4 19 2 . ., f:3.. C� p �{} 1 FZE::F�'1. ND CiRAD1.l -lf:i E : :cit,FZi:IW RE:.0 7479 :12 ..64 2 976 u 64 ; ' i f:34a :I. / }5x/ ) IY{f�! °'t._1 : ::1. "1: 11° l w `l"t1 'i ":{ a ..^ T OM t f�► {•dYl. 141:: :F� 1MAD ('1+:�1D ;i:14. 1" St::R[:lW Ftii::i: � �f:326 27 REFUND f:;F I :I: 11G EKSt%,F'.i:1W RE Ci ; #:!�` �) ��:'. p 4�; � � #:� . 42 � p 03 � h31 154 1 41 155 .a? �`: �� 01• /09/96 01.4 32 A p M p 1 : :: ,. !Y! p � 1il.lX {' C %'F* :I: F''T' L 01,41 i & Irl l: "IY iX:�I::: F {aI••! :1: f•�•�:x 40 4 0.00 143 23388 01/09/96 010465 A T & T DIGITAL F' AGE ::F*-; .... MIS 10.37 45 i'•' 1C;1::.1•� I:zl::.I - -!'T'r l... S1' : : R V :I. C %pF 2 1. : } .. . 46 .17 23. 01 /09/96 042503 (1�i�if:lf: I NT :I: ON OF IYIE::'T OV �il.J�:��:�f:;F+::[ F�''T' :C CI1�It :� IYlE ::tY{X {E::F # :i!•-I:I: F='�:a 6 6v464.00 62 48 MUNICIPALITI 63 6<1 49 �:...� • +� :1./4 / ) 1.4 .1.{ ,.j.a : {1. r+.. ".I:I�I(:, MCI T'1'�IC� �l�f {� I��c:11 -1::1 r't� 1 1 : ::ltl'r•r"�1... ^.� p C ?+�� 2,.o a 0 0 151 23 408 01/0 210:1.90 DCINA1...D !.) ...VE::F DA & A1c>13 *0(' A'T * ES TRAVEL & TRAINI 700 700 .. 00 '! 152 153 2. 41.8 01./09/ 37007 !'•11.11)1'11:» ":i f f.i0 }I'1: »1. »1...0 IRI: »�'��1.1.1�11: »l'� I° I;::l:» 1 '1 r, %50 p 00 4. ;5(; a Oo �° X -- -- -- - - - { _.._��� ,::'.: '` - .1. {.� {�' - -- - -- } t lr !.: .l. <ti� .l. �:�t�111... C. C� hl l" 1::. I' �l: :.h`1C:�:. - - [ K ___ ---- - -_ - -- - --- - - - - -- - -- - - . _-.- - - --- _ _ 1 28 . .e.. ,. +t:. a ,t.... , 75 +;S ••y r ;ti �• r1 'w Y :: v T REA SU RE r {;+ r •, ^. • r,•+ , . r•� ". c% r• 7 R....) X21. 01/ 09/96 wi0 428 l 1 a 1.:. a 1 ! .. A n !'•� � .. {. (' ! :t: l•• r :!: c :Ill '� R 1�1l:::IYIJL�I:�I'� �I'•I :1:1•• � .:►t� ., 4�4� �ti4� .r {. �? 6 i .)1 X :) .� , ,. .,. ,. f.:.l: T Y OF 11A! I.1::.1,Jt.lf.lJ(: . .... .. ` V Vf Il 1CA.-IF:1:ti/ 5 5 f:rt•• {E::( ": i C C:t••tE ::f:r i V VENDOR � �1E : :I- lief :IF 1)AT1 . N NUMBER N NAME* D D{ :SC% -FZ a:1 -' a:OFI n n {Y1r.�c.l1�{•r n n!Y{f:�l.���•r 6032 0 0 /02/96 : :1.501.75 C CfCll...l...:l F IS ED ... E C.'1' u u C::CINS T• p ( (`-0.. C CF 1.J J :1. 36 : :I. r, 90 1 1. a 90 p 67 i, 6 6033 :t. /02/"?6 5 541.400 1 113:111A.. ;.} r>r1 r1::: r rl�ti{ : ; 1.1i'•+. {::.c�� { {Yit:l'rta {�. V 1"{ 1...:1: c: i��•1: ^C.:t> 1 1 ��'�1Jf: L.E. 1 1.8 „ 06 .. 00 1 1. �:, ry ... ��c} .. 4 }�� , , 112 c c� }f � }�' 0 01/02/96 1 1 !541400 hl .l. h�lh{ p }•T•�'r r�» •T 1' !:"r1{ S l.aC4 »f:�' i i•r�1•rl: :. X �ti 1: + 1:.1•';j:} 1... T. C: F'•� "{::.S !"'�t`����1...t:» l l c�� l .r "�� 7 767.50 i iF:• ;14 6 603 0 01/03 541.400 t tY1 1:1 �i1�1 p :} T' •r'I": I I'1•�I .:)1.11•�i ::;l'�, f f I'A'rl::: T�1•�.1: V ETZS 1... ] C. 1: "I : : :I: ::;:) !- �1 YET: ;1...l... , ,.ti 5 �� r. � . ti ' ' 550..75 c�} ..• r rr STATE ; T { 1 ��'�1'Y►X { { ... {::: : :i..a ., ,�:..�:.1. p 63 1 1. ti ., ,� �,�::i. p 63 I I' 1:{...1f: }l.�I•�:�:.I•; I IYtC� t c::1: t:� {::•C:::E "� a � 6 03 7 01/ 32 0'% 500 f71Rt.11..11"' 1••ll::Y- A.3 INC. p 1.99 F IRE :.M .I. U11 X: 1.11 ::. _ %.} •'){ _ _ - _ ._._ -- 1s JAhI1.IARY 1. 996 PREMIUM DUE: 5t: }9 a g r i W15 zo JANI.If 1RY 1996 F •RE M :t:1. M DUE 91.5.. 58 1: B ., 902 p 7 21 - 2 If , • 0 .. 8 10 3196 53 0100 IYi I CA 1::1••If3 1: f :l::: ZTr- t1 19 ! •'RE- 113:1.lIYI T ?1.11: :: 3, 30 �( zs if ANl.1AFtiY 1 996 PREMIUM 1:1.111 D1.1r:: 9 ti p ;5 2 :,. •. JA1ti11.1(1RY 1.996 i °RE "IYI :I: 1.1{Y! 1. f :l ., ��e�y"' p r r.3 :l. i - l�hll.lt1:+;'Y :1.996 PREMIUM 1�1.lI::. 1. „ {#:. : } t 2 4 - rti >i:; ., ., p �. t1h11.1r1 1. t'�) ADM 1" t :»1:» I)1.11::. x } } N :. �: 60 .. 4 �ti Y9 01 /03/9 1.801. D p 1:, p A p n I1 "It' � ^, 6040 01/03 "'.ti "'.x:1.1.4 MN IYI1.! (1.i�1l... LIF .I:hi�il.1l'4 = 1hli..i::. �JAIA If`�RY :1. { �96 PREMIUM Y�1.1E a+•'�2 p 04 39 JA14l1.1A 1.9 i °'I:Z *:IYt:i:l. M lL: 7 9 9 1.50 JJO JANUARY R 1 :t. 996 F�I : I �. M Al1.11° r• ,/y Y 2 ` 46 .. 94 'y 4;' J,j � •� 1. t :� p F l� I�:. 1, I�.. i x.1:31 41 60 0.1. /f. 3 6 50 .1.400 ITIAD .1. ,. }f: N 1~!t'•�T I CI1 l...l. F• i : :. ;1�t�l�I1 .I. �� �c�) 1•• {•zE..lY1:1.1.111 �f�1.1E:. �:. X34 4 .. c� 6 2 K ..) 4..66 i idy , 2%2537 9 01/0 D 0(:)l IYl : :: ! ,E ::F "1:11 ll� f�l• AD I:1 G% E :.,. }C SOW !• EC. "l' 4 19 2 . ., f:3.. C� p �{} 1 FZE::F�'1. ND CiRAD1.l -lf:i E : :cit,FZi:IW RE:.0 7479 :12 ..64 2 976 u 64 ; ' i f:34a :I. / }5x/ ) IY{f�! °'t._1 : ::1. "1: 11° l w `l"t1 'i ":{ a ..^ T OM t f�► {•dYl. 141:: :F� 1MAD ('1+:�1D ;i:14. 1" St::R[:lW Ftii::i: � �f:326 27 REFUND f:;F I :I: 11G EKSt%,F'.i:1W RE Ci ; #:!�` �) ��:'. p 4�; � � #:� . 42 � p 03 � h31 154 1 41 155 .a? �`: �� 01• /09/96 01.4 32 A p M p 1 : :: ,. !Y! p � 1il.lX {' C %'F* :I: F''T' L 01,41 i & Irl l: "IY iX:�I::: F {aI••! :1: f•�•�:x 40 4 0.00 143 23388 01/09/96 010465 A T & T DIGITAL F' AGE ::F*-; .... MIS 10.37 45 i'•' 1C;1::.1•� I:zl::.I - -!'T'r l... S1' : : R V :I. C %pF 2 1. : } .. . 46 .17 23. 01 /09/96 042503 (1�i�if:lf: I NT :I: ON OF IYIE::'T OV �il.J�:��:�f:;F+::[ F�''T' :C CI1�It :� IYlE ::tY{X {E::F # :i!•-I:I: F='�:a 6 6v464.00 62 48 MUNICIPALITI 63 6<1 49 �:...� • +� :1./4 / ) 1.4 .1.{ ,.j.a : {1. r+.. ".I:I�I(:, MCI T'1'�IC� �l�f {� I��c:11 -1::1 r't� 1 1 : ::ltl'r•r"�1... ^.� p C ?+�� 2,.o a 0 0 151 23 408 01/0 210:1.90 DCINA1...D !.) ...VE::F DA & A1c>13 *0(' A'T * ES TRAVEL & TRAINI 700 700 .. 00 '! 152 153 2. 41.8 01./09/ 37007 !'•11.11)1'11:» ":i f f.i0 }I'1: »1. »1...0 IRI: »�'��1.1.1�11: »l'� I° I;::l:» 1 '1 r, %50 p 00 4. ;5(; a Oo �° X -- -- -- - - - { _.._��� ,::'.: '` - .1. {.� {�' - -- - -- } t lr !.: .l. <ti� .l. �:�t�111... C. C� hl l" 1::. I' �l: :.h`1C:�:. - - [ K ___ ---- - -_ - -- - --- - - - - -- - -- - - . _-.- - - --- _ _ 1 28 . .e.. ,. +t:. a ,t.... , 75 +;S ••y r ;ti �• r1 'w Y :: v T REA SU RE r {;+ r •, ^. • r,•+ , . r•� ". c% r• 7 R....) X21. 01/ 09/96 wi0 428 l 1 a 1.:. a 1 ! .. A n !'•� � .. {. (' ! :t: l•• r :!: c :Ill '� R 1�1l:::IYIJL�I:�I'� �I'•I :1:1•• � .:►t� ., 4�4� �ti4� .r {. �? 6 i .)1 X :) .� , ,. .,. ,. C O F •X . ,. :!.:: I.I t: lt.l�.,l-•il :::f=� /t.�l•�fl : "f� t I-�I:�� :1: a� TE w FOR I��•I : ::f`t :I: I:�I� a. f� i VClUCN IE :R/ _ -_ -- f:.i••lE::i K C;k•lECfK E: :hiY Clfi VEEN1)C.)F :r. •r�:: :I: •r c:� ::c:: I�1 �R D ATE' Y h1 U i�r IE R I- ,IAV : :: 11 -••r :l: c • �t�t f�tY UITr (1 t' I CA MA T 23425 0 1/09/96 55. X00 ITIN RE-C. & PARK �1t�S0C%P :l AT 100 c -} l. I . c , % ,( : % -Fl.I. F• T I C)ht::} & IYIf "tYfx��..�'4�:}I••I E � •�:} 20.00 20.00 - . • •• \• a• VOID pt r '• �..! Z � `.. `..'i ! �.. f FF t r - �..� l � = ��N�L'�'J��6lIWwk�!•„Ar�:�rdl A� ._ —. ��•� __ _._ ...._...._ __,_ __�_— 23445 0 1 /09 /96 850 500 SU BURBAN ,fir FEA Cf• AIYII E - F: OF' TRAVt «L f < , f1-4 3: NG -- --- - - 1 .5 . 00 — - - - -- I -100 23453 0 :I. /09/ 9 10,5 00 VA.S% R B I c�IH REEMrJVA TR ASH REMOVALL.. �' • � • t'4 r'1 {�}i••t t•+.I::.t'rft. VAI... . _ 2 3 0 . 8 2 � � !� j y. s� j� TOTAL ta••IEC: $127 ,X4'8 :`29 ,I ;i I: Ij I I j 1 I , r r. F c c; F 6 i — 7 1 t17 ' -"C. 9 6 a CITY �.�t" � IYIsGI r��l...�::4�ac:�OD _ 1 �: }' '� 1 ? .. � 1}( W 5 CT .. . �- - _`�.�_------ _._.-- - - - - - DATE .., l l�.sl�IZ {l::.i'+, !�l tYll::. .l. t 1::.!'r! - ______.+.---- ..�___... -__ __ :r.'Y' :rrt _.._ - -- 8 ' 0 c:rr4 :I:I��''r:r. c:zl�i AMOUNT i: C t y 0 . 1. , iu � ..r:.� ...i.I,f:. l�::i....! ,+�, y 1 •il 10 ... .. I _ Yr . y W__«_ • • r d} .t 2 { .. a . d.. .!' 2 I d 1...,.. -. .. a . .. j j+� 12 6046 01/ \ ,�, "•.ti ,�96 _ - --- - -- - -- -- - - -- - - -- -- 1.'. 01. 5 c.P OI...l....l.l%l Y i::.t. »i::.l.r'r' n c•`�' � � "' ' .r ..! i i s: r N y c.r c.! n i � i::. I i"1 .I. !'L !'�l f='I .I. !' 1 � i::.1:i �.� ! " 1::. l�! 15 1 ' ' I 1 - .i. I - _ _ _ �I;:.f•'�t IYI '►:l .t�IT./i:..CK- 1.l.r•'IYtC :.hi' 949.58 J. E. �' r;c�_ — _____ i 16 �15 6047 0 1/0:1/ 6 0 1. 1. 00 E - 4 C) D :r. Iq „ i�;l� lklr:�l:: 17 18 Y '. 20 18 FIROGHRAIJ f-, .t :..r r L :? 21 22 _rF>:r. ttil :r. t�lc:� : !. {� N rf 23 -,� !:: ►1�4[:It�i�ZA14 1.11 ``! 't...:I l ::f — 20..2(. 3 .. 24 ` 1 { :i(.1l��'I •'1::. a: h :t .. VE ::I" l :I: CA... l °: :1. 2.68 25 26 - y — •a r •y .t' .. 7 ., ?3 r I'Lf'1�.�i::.I... I'I'l .. 9. _. ze _....2 2,1 t" I::. IE %3% !"� c:�i'� ) i::. l'�` .i. l.` I '. i: .. S: a: 30 TFIIA E.L. & �::cal��'i�= 32 2fi _ r��rtc:�c f'1I 'i ...L ::� :y 1 — a.y�Y 1 t"'I'' f.aL•;i•�AII t L�l:•'f''l....l.I::: ;:} 33 - 28 t:: +la !� . 0 25 .:..i: !•'t:al: ; YI:.F .t. t.� .:. +: { •• � } 3s �s7 30 F I��t:J►[ f�;AM c:i�l:li=oF I.... rI : :' {'' J. J. { : � �'�t — -- !''I { t.t!•: +I:: +l....I - F.: S ,. + :F. :!. 38 32 ' 1 1 4 yr 1::.1... 1 1't .. .: �' a T 0 33 %*.)4 6 -'5 01 34 N•llJt;; N• !! f 1'i' : l:I�I E ST A T E �.��.�!'tiI�l1l'rtl::. 100.00 1 3 .c.. l 0 36 iii. »(� #:il : ::l�+; ., {a'r't ::: "'I..lr�hi ICI : ::i�='�.lh } .... 1) Irac:)c: G c::c:)r"tt::{'•!i c::l...:t: I�f :t: c:; '=' _ 44 45 -— ��-- -- - 37 r..a.Y • A.. N �J{? 20 46 47 .J ('Yt Yi'} I R� ti :�` +� ' ---�. ... !'` l .... f 11 : »�i l.J :; .. i a:y ' �.f!" ': 2 a S 48 r.'�•v qq tt 19 .c..a.Yr�69 0.1. / 1. �Y / { ?�t:Y ' N l : ::I: l...'Y ,, MAR 1 A ■i• "L.1 d. a 5 49 ' i ,. r L! 0 / 9 6 2 s c:ja: :Yc: Ji:lAN 'i.11t •� Jlf �l L.r 1::. I ;:} 1::. ' 5 -- a l.i .I. "'7 N it tf 54. { 54 BR 55 - x 'Tf•'il:: v ' +2 4 76 0 J. � 1. 6 / {` 6 r�t� DIRIF }':} t.:!••!i: °I•E .... a +t' .t 9 60 i ., .!. ' I•EI::.I•• -, l I} .... !:� r�1I�! .I. l.. I�! Y; { : }!"lt:;' !"'!'l c.aF4 f�1 T'1::. X 2 r , ' {� a 61 'ti . .T— � 8 63 2 0 +rt.�!` ...�.� MINE a JOHNN N s a :1 N r 65 „ t ��l : :: I� "1J1�l1� I-)EM] F-UCH CAIRID �� 67 » %� { X 0 .! / � / 9l�Y _ .. N .. _I• .. 00 � - _ ,t..,.} _ +�1 - r'11:::I'�t" B I: 1: S 1:� AC%, l�flt:al: :: :L 3 7 ,, r. �0 :I. . 50 s� 70 •f..1.Y r CY ice- 1�`i 1 , �y _ _ 71 _ _.. : L 6 / r' chi r�. 'c.tl .t .I' 133 ,. �r�r - +�f"1 - . i ` Y r..` ;.�...._ __._..__..._«.__.._._._.._....«._ I. ,� N �yr�_...._...._..._.... �., ire .c:�, }�ic:y••v a.} 0 1 / 1 6 / 9 6 (::+ f'�'r' 1:+'t' V% (/ �._....-_.«...,.,-.._.....«.,_.__._..._._._____... ...._.__..._..__...__.._:..__ «.._W. .!. 76 1'+.1: :.r !.)itil.1 54.. ' 4 0 � N ' j .. _ �,� t:� �.� [:f r�t t �: r 1 .�. .. ! ti . i [ ._..._._......._ ...._.. __ . ., .. i ! `! ":C' _. 4___._..._.-.___. �.__.. ..._._...____..__......_ _. �f .1�.�[.rl — a .attitr {I...l�� x�� rt;;: t�t�.»tit� {t:�r� r�nttiti::: .—__ __ _ ._ —___- — - - __..�__---- .r. t: »rt - - - - -- �:.� :-� ____...___.._ T� -- — R �•tr::: :: � � Iii::: {:i[:t�' :I: t °''1" J: [:ll�I tlitit[:Il.1t�t' y a �. [.J ... i��• •. � �:'.:a�s:3�} C�:t. �:l.l� .♦ [� ;1..: l.! iai.li .... I� 1 "'1 i �'` 3�:: i�� [•` :' _ ..._._._.._._.. _ �� / k - -�- --_—._ ___- -_-- }� {��i -- - .____.�_. —__ - .---- ._...__- �.-._. [al�ti(= X1.11.. �, JLjI:: :X {Jf� : :l° • t• ; t t• .." t�r�t•�n•rt::. __._ — __._. ~ - _ - -- - __._- _.__._.--- - -.... — ....___ ._-- __.___— _.—__— - - - l f a:} .. 5.��a� / l l y y t t .: }l� �� 4f�! >; �'� �r�F�:f:3 � ��:t: J':!. c� } / { i�t�} +;�:I. �? �i � ":� ('1C�1::.. F•1�1��;I�i�Jf11 :�;!•:: -- ------- .. !�'r�[:�[:;t�.:�t~t �a�.�r�'r- 't..:t: r:::::f .___.. - - -- .--- _.____.__._...— ____- ______._ .:Y ____ __._ _ —_ � �.. a } (�} ,� ��. .�...�.�.....�._ i tit.::. �'� [.r (1 t.. �►[::1;.: [:3 [:; [:31� I'Y't��' [:31.�� [:: [ :� tYl t' i � . W� •. ,. �- -- r...___� - ._- Xrt.11.. - "'t:�!'� - :t. r , _...�.._.._.._._ . a. ,. ..31�I'r' t • � � , [.r[:31...1...� t"�t:,t:::t t[.r� a. }l::t;�J� ..,, . _.-- ___.....__. • =r •1 :•,�- —._. : . Y : .,,, T __..�...._._.._ •Rya. } "F�rf� —_ r� :t.{ :t. }l {Yy�} _— _---- - - - - -- ���:� :I.�� "t;1 - -� .._ - -- �I ';.I :l.f�� at C` :�•'� N t,:C t� tt::: l �t a. (.J I• r• t... Y - - -- !Y! �1 �' �: }! �: F �; ' � (1 r '' _ _ __.._ -_ .. ... c � t � � �:} t: t'4 V [.� t::: - _�— __.____ t.} ,r �• .t: q I..ti } n K:3 �:ti r� ... . � - -- — ._ .•. v � ` `'i � • �r .f. � r' __._.... _ ._...�_�___.�- ..�__.__ -- . . . : t : ['`'r :t: [:�t�t ;:a zit::: _ r't _._,. � _... _._ _.....__.. �___._._..._..�.�_._.. �t 1 • i..t � q 'l� ' � � � .. • • .t � ., • .} �, t X d y .. . 1.. � � ti I �t :{: ttl[: .�.�_: __�... .�__W� - ........._..r_�. ... _.. _ W � .� � .. r�'t�ti[.l[�t�ti�t'� '` .11��'t�' ' {'' �A - - -�'— -- �- _..._.._a �..ri.. a � -_.__ �• }`• P �t. }a. }i.�l.r.1. � 1 1...�� ���.fl'a . :.��J�� a f � +�'�( .r '_- .. - ar :: r u act - a - - �•r� __ - - - _.__- ..__.. _ .- �;.1. i�f'•`li 1 �..�:.� � �:.i - ► i'.•i'aL.Jl:�in��l -� � { .i.�..�...����� _._ .. _..__ .._. __._... _ __. _ - - -- -• - ... ..'� _ .. --- - - - - -- - •- .._.._..___...__- - j "v �. .. � Sl . I �. _'a�'a.r� _ _ '- �. --- --- .. _.... ti r r r_S f� F -.._ � _.. •� �..._..�.... t� t ,�r �t 'a! .t..� � K.? � {?� S:} j � f� � t.} .1. � L1 �r y� A:; �!'4 t'l I.: ('''t[:! .! i�'! t': . i t 4 .t. ttit[7 � . . .. , t t'`t [ r,� �y� � �� •i {� �� �� J ,[ • ... z. t:..t...��r...t�l t .t. �tttra ,. }t: »t ; �,� :i: c:t:: �. t:�''r �t�tt'� �r•� aratt� -•r� _ __ �y�i����`c:`} � ?:I..�:i.�..��;�s�} ���r;�;:tit�� �;t:::i...l.:.�i:1:l��t:: �3�it4t :t :'T'�"t`:C[ :lt�t ---- „�----- .ti--__ `l ;ti- � _ __.� r,l:::[:rY[.ri...:t: t` t[.a aal:::l:��:i: C <t” ' P � � .f. �} f ?� �i �� �••i � � �� �:! r'1 � C:' I::� � i'ti t••e Y ti "'"ft = i••. t t r ..""."' a " i _ i t .... a "-.��) .. 4�� :�t� � t�� �. ���� M ��� :t. X1:3 u ::i{:� :� �t:3 M �'yt3 f r•� • ,v i(J {�, t• � �� .t � t l } � f S:} a C .•. r a.r -- r � a.i \f .�. .}� � } � „ a.f f .. {fit i. a - -..._. _... _. _ _ .._ ._. t r .. } � _ � � I-:. tYt .., .. .. •a '` ' • �ti .. �' } _ ..._. �3�} ,, i�lt?� [.r�t•;t...t::.„ irt: »�►t�{i::. r r t::: �t:::t••i:i:t::t...l::: f�i...t...[:II,IJr•�ttt[::t::: � �'� N f:3�� a • ;'��, . _ ry + . �:: _.__. _�. -..._ __..__-- ..-_._ _ - _ W._.... c:. - r' {::.t•� .t. t�ttti : t�f' r x�t � .., ..�`��� t. �� 1:� ��� a. ,. - - -- - ____...____ - -- -- ______ ___. ___—._ IJI " f:a ral _. t.. (,1t ; !�ll.!' :: � N : f y "y .. r, �r) :I. r.� �� » �� r•1':* 1. f. `al . {. � .1. � }l t �i..} .1. ��f �. a�'a� l.r'..�! �. i� � �l�'4l . {. {� {[.i _._._... _ ._.___ -- ___-._ - -- -- - - -- — .�:. a. ay� } #� __ __ - -- .�» � » C�,. : t �C } I�lPubltit ,, �I... [:�t:" •rt��n�i:::t... 'rt��:t: tkt �: tit[.; �. �� ,. ��� - _:t - �,. �:. T't��r''lt�t:�l... '1 "Fti r'°t :t: Itit :I: I�([:� :i. � N +'b _ �C.. aa�:�l.J� if '. _.__ '�..�\ ♦ i i i �t + 1 1� i.J -i i `- • i ::..i.i i q _�.1. i 'i l.r ,: _.� -_.. - - - _ ...._ ::. •• �a`i�? ��_ . tai T'i:TC; I":.. :: •�IC.tT • � Y ... • _.._.____..._ ._. -__.__ _ _..___..__._ ar (( .ti - - --- -- - - - -- a .•( �. l.� a. q � .r �� •a a.r w ,� if iF 1' • �c 5i! 58 ,g JO �� )7 .� -- — __ —__ -- .. a. .. ..a.} .1. � �f� 71 "r .. :t. � .. � � � jj� r r _ y( Y� +� Rya.} a . y d.. C.} ;.� '� a � a� �•' t... t....[� • 1 "; �. r t:. [ t.J { • f 'c [.J ! :. �'` 't - __.._.� ..__.._. ._.__— — .—_. —� _`— ._ —. —_ ------ — - � 2 � •+ ...} .t. t'�t[.. ,� [.. [.r�t.. t'` 7s f a ar � „ a -------._._.._.._..._..._ ..... ........ W__...._�.._......�..._ __ ..._..._.._____.._._____..._ - -- ... �..._..._._..,._...._.....-._.._. �_..- ....- ._...- .._..._.._...._ . .,._..�.__.,..._.........__.... � [ .`.I"t! ",IYI.(. + r• •j :3 75 t�t:::t �`� :t: t�4;:� � r�'rt�t[:.t::: ,..�r:::[:��.1 a: t- �'tYrt::t�!'r . p F. 1 '' � t ;,; a t ' A� �".�f aP'�7+^'"�"?.' � y ;r✓'�jEanz �,��� .,r ,. - t� • .. , ��.. -� )1/12/96 10-n-05 7 C. ITY (:)I:: I V IN LF .-Wocm 1--I F:: C, K Re E : ( . 3 r C , I . F r I .- Z VOUCHIERVC V cv, F vr TDn rk TT ETT 41 VIBER NUM BEER � 0 BG 2 4 7 X I M. 11 CIFIEK-CK, - lYft:lt.11kl T' AMOUNT 2Z-5520 01/16/96 5901.00 01/16/96 390374 IND•PIENDUENT SCHOOI... D 1ST SUPFIJAHM OFT7 0622 3: C, E. "R RECR C)I-%l PROCI ZAVIS B TL -Ii :'A*Y'r: Ce D 20.46 :11 84 0169 TIS-1. 51 Cell-Kill 3: CAI ... %(3`. C} I N 281.99 281 .99 225";524 01.1161ge 0 CT (Yl % J & W 1:114,E)TRUME NCF it 01-116196 ;5;;,2000 MN I*:1IlBE:*RW0LVF% ::c VF : :c% .. 53 54 55 78.1 50 UND & (:% I .. CING J Y*F 74.28 153. 40 =..%T7 r 5.1 Financ e icers T 2,*-')'%*.i 4 S 01/16/96 Assoc, 0 IlLJSKA L. 1: GAIT 1: 1-4 0 1 f 4 T E 1 71-5 4 00 %) Zl Z'.5519 01/16/96 370076 IF: S% C S .: • j7� ... 1 :7 1) d J 1.68.00 322. 00 %X e = 6 4210150 1 14 KO RATIO ONAL R 58 59 2Z-5520 01/16/96 5901.00 01/16/96 390374 IND•PIENDUENT SCHOOI... D 1ST SUPFIJAHM OFT7 0622 3: C, E. "R RECR C)I-%l PROCI ZAVIS B TL -Ii :'A*Y'r: Ce D 20.46 :11 84 0169 TIS-1. 51 C} I N 281.99 281 .99 225";524 01.1161ge 52 % J & W 1:114,E)TRUME NCF it 01-116196 ;5;;,2000 MN I*:1IlBE:*RW0LVF% ::c VF : :c% PROGRAM (%3LJPPL E 53 54 55 78.1 50 78. t' .. F- I E f i %) Fi: 225.,00 2,*-')'%*.i 4 S 01/16/96 620600 0 IlLJSKA L. 1: GAIT 1: 1-4 0 1 f 4 T E 1 71-5 4 00 -- .56 57 • j7� ... 1 :7 1) d J 1.68.00 322. 00 %X e = 6 4210150 1 14 KO RATIO ONAL R 58 59 ST J PT- TT -- T E . I r--7 , sr. W I C 60 23,549 01-/ 1 9 6 640550 C % .125 p 62 3156 62 23553 PIROGRAM 661755 3:1.2.34 23534 Ol /l 6 9'6 1,5 10 5 0 BAKERY PROGRAM T f ::{ y ... UTII ... IT I E S ISUPPI ... 47.20 47.20 1/16/ 681.1.51 3 -L 2. 2 S 782.-61 67 68 E % VIDSE. FOP! F F: -* %) A L E' 5 - 5 218. 25 760.75 (T f -017 37. 78 37..78 69 70 L-r L'if-Cz; c:} % r - --------------- -- s 52 2%*%)-l-el-7 01-116196 ;5;;,2000 MN I*:1IlBE:*RW0LVF% ::c VF : :c% PROGRAM (%3LJPPL E 53 54 55 2 2%5 0 0 225.,00 2,*-')'%*.i 4 S 01/16/96 620600 0 IlLJSKA L. 1: GAIT 1: 1-4 0 1 f 4 T E r . : - ( . 1 tj I. - 11 1 .- 14 1 . p -- .56 57 C Z.) F.: 131 -r 28.03 64.28 58 59 ST J PT- TT -- T E . 60 23,549 01-/ 1 9 6 640550 1-%I[1 .. %C)%()I-%l V E F-I *1 CA ... E ALLOWANCE 3156 62 23553 01/16/96 661755 NORTIAIEF-04 UTTI IT 3. r r c 0 28 . 0%3 2 0 (1) \.} 6 65 ... UTII ... IT I E S 7n470.40 -1. 66 1/16/ 681.1.51 3 -L 2. 2 S 782.-61 67 68 - IVI S% C% E- L. L. A 1.11 C) U C 37. 78 37..78 69 70 T --F 71 .-T-UG F I R- A 72 2,`55158 0-1-116196 7 0 0 B Cl 0 :'AI::'F:R WA , I Nf. D PROG'RAII 131 U P F L. I: 1::: ..(.% V 62. *20 C % 73 74 75 , .. oil 1. r E %:) r `L2.ZV7 76 2"55"59 2-3 * 0-1/1.6/96 7:1.1.500 G%C) 5.01. i C ITY OF MAP t...f::u,IOt:ll) Vt #(.)t*"Il-•Il. - '.I: `f t 61.)CIAE R/ 1l :ri— ____ C' >I F•:t::l t:::C�it:�l�; - - -- - �:F::F•tlf.7F�. — tf DATE. I�1l.1f {�:� f'6f I)I ::: �f� :I: f:''T' :f : :ll*I AMC — C;F�Il: :: t :.' !� AIYlt: UI-11T 4 6 9 10 ' P. f1? 235 01 / 1 6 / 96 7421.60 1= AIYII a t::: Y tart: # l.11�l 'T'Y I�L I�'t.�t:Jt=ti)F : ::J�i' I��:f1lYlt: t : ::ft >l : ::IYII : �It!'r lf ) t:Jt: ,`t.JfYJt : ::itt'T' {3 1 f /1 �• i 0 L) 2 ,:} ;164 01/16/96 15 5el) "i Ir l:'.1 111••1ARI :C 1 ;t�t�' :I: 'Y'1.1�' :l: t:lltl�ll... !�= 'i:lt:ll }f:+ . }! !t"'i:'! 1' F� �i N�• Y <:� ... r::rx�.J:l: IIl: ::ItiIT' f. 1 E, yq 4 0 0 .. . � s IH , ..., , ., .. ,E.,:}ftl... t::. :1.93. '.y {� ,. 2 2 1 t. r; I' I:: t::: I) %t ) .. 22 :;r FOR • t. 1! 8 25 C ....y a 4 OF SLJJ M I....1:1 .' :S yyr C:. " � _ 28 2., • f {., .. ..� . « Y �, v .. ;1..5 30 •• 2 1.18 - .. :. 31 ,, :: >t.Jt ! "•t....r. E :. % ... t.�I t.< .1. t''r:: ., �e:. ••Y � �S 33 _ ---. _ 1-: :: t :ll. J .l r'' tYir...r�r�r' .... t.,r- 'r- '.r.t..r ,... . . n •Y•.Y -.{{ + r. .. 34 35 ., ..,, �» +�..,. } ,� i 0 1/16/96 "r'''f i 7wi {:#!•�.1 °' t::t : #!�!{ l.Jt...'r... ., GROUP .., .. ., .I_i�tt7 C�I•�CIt.Jl� C 89 - -- Y _ _ 36 i 4 L },;1 ::• M .r.l� n t:lt.J'r�i1:DE 1 : »I %I(')%.T � F-1.R. •' "' . .c..t�a n '56 n 53 6 !1 9I:i6'} ':S, , n , 37 36 1 . .. . I ! »'1'�:t. GIRAlYf Yc.JI "•!•''r... J... . ? u 41 � - .} Y .} } � }, ItiI1. c. - A ' Tr .... �.,.:Y�y + �. 2 '32 a t !y 2. . t ,. '�'.'f� �� fry{ 42 + 123570 ...,. t: #t ! t::•I.JX:sl...:C t::(t :r. C114l-. {:t f l.. �J,II:..!' � t:f1... F.. f;rr (''� Y � r•y r• Y ••. �:• 44 – 01/16/96 - - -- t ......, ., . » f-F 1::.t..I I RA D I O %S % E.RV .r ( - E :., :} _ r � t: "I•''f`r 1. I' & rY A I I�rr RAD l If � 45 46 .I. ~r:r�•r�:� r� �:�Yrn a: �l�r,�r;:�x� � c� � , y ,:� n 47 4a # q y j •� y� { } �.! t " " 1 1. I:» S :# .... 1::. t:# t. 11. r +•• J (f:» F-I T' 911. n � 6 9.4 �„ l „ �� 4 9 . . . .... ��,: }c)a t'�- - "• Jt zt 1< > r f1 T ta r w . �I:. 1 �' 50 S1 .I. J::.::} .... t: ::tip 1: I��'IYII:::lt1'T' 21 52 r.' FtiCIC, {"�1•' M ��t.J�'1"•r...rF:. <:) t' F�'l�Lt: AP tal.Jt ~'J��'t... T A. 1: : ,% " f:,� 54 2`a,5",;.• 810 {)5 --- ST f. I "•ftl.Jl.+ ., t.,.CT'Y t.11•• _ •:Y 30.22 :1.07,.9 55 ' •,' 93 ....Oa t;01*4{:} rI :UCT .I. ON 57 • _.._.�_. _.. ... l J � r.; '" � ! Y F 59 , OT- :t. � i flZ:�tYl:F Itt C;t:lf: i , •. y 61 {� ::i.. ,;� ft I)l �I:i : C OS T('% �i�' fit:. f; "` ':.!. "Y'F•1.» ::} : tt l�c�> .�..,�.. , , sz 64 +» 0 1 /1 .6/96 _. ., f:# 4,�; i ; 5 �t••I1 I ' �'' -� ,, t . » 1. C I .. #:yl.li .. JJ . »:: :r . ! I ! 65 6 s i.J »..� 577 ,~ tr 6 850600 f i.Ji��'I : : l Yfl : ::r� :I: gift ,�....} ,. n .... h :.t:it. J 1 I IE:.1"I 'T' r•y '�'f:# 71 � .I. d:. n �t.. .._._ ;i.�..TM,�.•''�� M) '1577 { }�r�nr _ - '�rc " , _. ` �- & t.J.l.l... __ _ ` •• 99 73 7,5 , y _ St.Jl� 1.I::.z.y� ..:` C) - rT.�t..� - W � �F I'l l::yE::�::1... I ECH .J � c:.t:� a: r: :: {:� ,:....... IYI:C; : iC. - E :.I...I...A1l :::t:#t. % t•, f : .. ��,y -f :y Cr Cr0IYl 'r .I. r::. 7 99 II )�I /1-2/96 1. 0 0 5 CW MAPLEWOOD VOL)CA-11: SZEC1101 FACIE: ..2 4 . mc. r� r T • cl I #: C. I < 9 I MY113E.R. T 7 .1 .0114 r)IvIO(.)N*Y' is 6 {7'' 66 I::'R()C)I:ZAM 1: F: 63.. J. 5 I::'RC)G)PA1vI (%3UF:9I::'L:I.- 11 2%5 3 16 -I :. 26 5 1%5 0 F. I ::C U* r.: 5..Oo % I::.(%:) .• .. on. 12.76 378. 85 23580 0 J. /1. 6196 8807'50 *T*I:Z(')Y CHEA C61... 1: 1%4 D 1.) 1:7. (%:% CU-111111 CAI ... (3 .1. 7'%5 .. S 5 21 t SUPPLA 2.. 24 23 5f 31. 0 3. 1. 6196 3 W .1 N IT y I.. :Iw I.... T I . . R S 1: R V 1: C %:)(jPI:*- EQU I 1::*Ml:-i%!-r 3 10 98 31 • G 2,9 26 27 T) T7 I Z) 9 6 0 1.) T. ..S if Tr • J:I* PIVI E! I it I o (D - 129 I c 1.) 1 ::. 1 ::. 1 1 S 41.7.94 9:1.7.. 94 30 �3� UHTFor "7M) 6 -6 1`51 4_ UNI & CI .. 0 .1:1: l:= Z.) J. 345.42 LJI%4 & C. CYT* I I I C* % I ... A.. J 33.,55. 7.15. 51. 36 2 .i #: 5 0:1. /:L 6/96 900110 R'AII ... R 0 A 1) C*p C) @I r-:'RC)F:REt,,'-Y-Y MENIAL. 9 Ili 0 .. 00 950.00 37 18 39 RA. T. E. RMAD, _T -T � MA - R* I r Y _'RT!f4 T .9 % .9 52 02 o o 40 41 'C) P E R 'Y' Y RIENIAL LEAMS[i. 4090227 J. 80 00 1360 00 42 43 r . %yT r ST -T 11 o1a 1) of re ..T :757 __1441 1131 U 1:: V I... 'r 323. 12 4.5 : 1 % .. %.) .1 T orn. 340.20 UPPL* IE' % . _ ..,. _T_A C -5'07"11*'5*,")"-------'-*'*"-'-----'-'---'--'-'-1 af.) I-TOR.. L 527-J-35' In 23590 01/1.6/96 9;:i J. Z.3 0 0 Z.) C"01111 PLAMBIJAC37 28.00 I IMS 7) 5 - 521 153 % (% COMM II 3: U IS 35--00.... 54 CIPOIT11 1:1. . .1.1VIBING) 1I%I(%:)'F'F:i('-Y-I 164 .. 00 55 56 C* IBII .11 E& L) I V A " E C% T 101 '61 Of 2 0 D 1 92. 00 571 58 VY755 WIE'S I Bul. ME TRU .... E-EQUIPME-IT y. 9 60 ,:7 is 61 62 63 7_7 n7l - T 64 65 rA 6t 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 r -� 'TY OF tYlAr�'t...F ::l�it:lCllt ' _ ...:.. .. .. ....4 S r i • �.11 • i :..I•..I. t.��f:� .I. f ��.- -... _...._..._........_...__..,..._ _-.._..,,,-..-_ � ............. `.....__...._____......,. -.... _......._........._............__....._..__........_. ..�1..........,...__.........._ . �._....._...._. ._._- ....._._.._...._..._...... - .....- - a l ......_.._ � r.. 5 :; - ,•iii �. F ____ _ _ _ �,.�... - -- - - -__ _ ;BFI :! ,.__ ----- -f�f1lT+: - _ _- _._ _ ___ - -- -. .11�lT F ::1•� 19 DATE' I�ll.11YlX {E ::I� hlr�iYli::. X }F ::{ at:r'1 1:1 T' :!: t:ll�! R 9 A MOUNT >r�ltYtt:riaNT 10 1 0 .C.. 170, .r .} I .1. �1 � � •!' ' ' r--- ' ... -.... 12 i 1 1 .�.:._ �.. 5 13 12 6043 01/04/96 '541.40 IYI : f.!`II�! a : 'rA T 1: :. • 1'I F AZ *IR' { : 3'T' T r: D F�:I,Vt: RS i... :i.t.� t" I::.t::.: F•'AYA X6.41 E' 15 t3 . 7•• }�3..:aC� Y 04/96 541400 .. . . 'r {YtC!'T't:lF� '�F ::F'1 , :, F..:I: t:: F "E :: :.,.3 F {F..I~•. - .� 17 _ 1�1Y1: 1.0 q { +. 0+ta 1.0. ,20.. t0 ,R •�}��t�.' ��r���'1.t:) .t.��l� � .:._ .. 1,,'F�I• � .. . . - n r - 1 l JI �1 { `.� 1 _ ..I.. . . f _ ._... � 10 20 17 �' 1R a04 _ 01. /0 � / <; 6 ���••c 400 IY E PA „ f :i *Y'A' :: I'F r -D. SE.lRE R ":a'r'r :: I� T �,� �::� {:� t...: t: F EES PAYABL �•� »q 22 23 6 ? 3 .. 00 » �39 3 .. 00 �� 1.. ?0 : y Cy • t } 1., ;y �a 15 4 1.400 IYI.I.I�•II�I„ 'T'�1�'!.-:. • ('I•+;I::.r"��:i1.1IRE -E - I I'lt:�'T•t:11'4 •� »c:` ::• .» tel: »1 ° I I....I. t.. I+ "!:.`I t Y XiI. 2 n 25 ...k »I... 1. ,, 488., 00 1.0 q 4t3f3 .. 0 0 26 2� , �. 28 ,a 305 c' _ 0 1. ��1f:��'S 1• M .1. t I I ! :��'�'T'I:: ' ... ti ,. { ,,• f T'r 1'T'l::. IF4.1. �, i::.i•4 {a I J_t: FT t••'r�Ys1I:�1. 3 29 30 :.I: »l::. 70 7 05 .100 31 6 0 :1./08/96 P 53 1. 6 0 IYIF: .'i'F�t:lr'`t:al » .i. 'I't'•`Il�t �ft.11.11�tt:'.1. JAN 1 1 3EWAGAH. T'FZI:A'r'IYIF:.I%IT 33 '7 1 9 % - ) ! , 192. 00 19 31 ,8 _ -- I --- El: .. 50 35 0 6 0 5 1 5 - -- 01/ -- -- ?� � • I 1.40r} - -� I YI:t: h 1lt! .. a'r 'fi' r'l : :: 'r'F�;F : :1 # :3l.li F ::FL IYI CI' �l FtlF :: F•I i...:t: t: F" F :: F ::� F �'t'1 Y �1I:► I :: 37 39 - - -- -- _ :I. �'?i c�31»3 „ :I. {? I r,� 6 68 , A r ,, � 0,56 01/ 54 1. 400 IYi :r I�It�I u t }�r r��'r :: � 'I�; F ::ray at��l�+ � - -- ��T :: i��'falr'�11Es1.�i�. __,_ _ - - -- 11 839 . .. - .. t: •. ... r F.. •• ., .� �1S't!F•'I I'�, u lYlt:!' SJF ::F•I t..:r c:. F °F :: F : a F�'(�YiJFl...i :: ••`` a3 t�S �• o r_ :1. i r 45 23 4 66 - 0 1 /1.6/ 96 - - ---- (Yl ll,.l {: t: N iTl:::hlN I: rq : : :I:� l.11tlJf � .... � 016..1...1 :::YX:ct1I...I.. is l.1 : :: f a6 a . _ _ »I f 23472 ��:t.:�:i.6�`��'�y ��t:lF•lhl�:Ot::II�I, , IYlF ::i...VEFtl�tA .... FtiF ::F� l.11�tx� IMF ::r" Z�R:i: VT 14lC, - a9 �� S. �� 81. 50 .. .. 2 , yf 1 75 - -- 0:1./:1.6 -- �11~II�F:.F4 {: ? N g t: aF;i:: .'r't:rF 'II::.Iki - -- Ftil•.::!° .... D l F: F° t %I C)I - %[ - -. E ::VIB tYlF ::I�IJ[ • • �• 53 5,d 55 1, q ... "trJ : .. 23 482 0 r AD :i: t: )R y 1 .IRY 1��1 : ::I�" .. ::• ::• Y ,• •• •` � ," ,., , ,.. l.11� D .. Jt ul ! I rr r'1t.rt :r T' � 51. �..� }85 � t� �` ;� 5 „ �'t� �.� {�' .. ��� r 79 4 't. ....3 F; ... I� ».. t.a�,I::.I•:I•' Y F•'i.i!•4 .I. .1. { : 'f' {' .. .r .r 60 . 8 _ if 1. ! 1. 6 f 96 _ -- 0.1-0 N ra ..1Y1 „ 'r' I :" t.r I••! 1 : :: t:� l.11i: I_' „ IYI T :I: l�It'' :I: & I�! � :c I� •r' �t : : : t:� t. :r: I "'IYI ,, I . Y . J . /J. ti c.t.0.55 �'aCrl:.. F•tl•'iF'.I)t�J1i :: 230.88 230.88 64 w� F " { :a "" F:: :!: F�'IYIi� :Itl :1.9 ..64 19 ..64 65 66 ....... ......... , .. .I L 23,500 0 1/16 /96 _ 1 .. ..... , -- ---- _ F .I .,.3 ... i:Il :lr=al {'' Y 'al...l.. �T '` 70 lyl F . ! :. IY1�1'Tr:: . F•,.I.tll... 7 5 73 Y , ...,� • dal r• f r� ,�`�' ., ,�' . 7 4 ITIA 3. f: :.11 76 2350 . .i..l. 0 �:�f:3�� '� � t.r t:11:-*':1: 1 : ::R 1...1 : :: A c; 1 : :: ':; �, '•� ,a :I � < �, 1 ,... r. ,. ... I f� 2 35:16 01/1.6/96 ,`6 23 5 1. 8 01-11.6196 27 25 & VIA f-TUVEI-4:1 C•E 403.55 26 A p 467. Ir, en 7 28 J. -129 TFI-T-7VI .. . .. 717 _5 30 % ):L 0 7,5 0 (30VERNMENT F-rNoNCE: % K 0 ...... ---- --------- FEE /BUDGET AWAFUX: PROC 31 RE V E: W 275.00 27%5., 00 3202250 (33RAPis DAVE TE: YOUTH & J • JAN KAFO) 309.00 35 29 SO [-I P-1 M J. I F-1 ti L. t*. B L .1 N (33 (.-' JR *70c) - - eDe) JU 37 tj co 2 01-/1.6/96 390300 % 3* NDUISTR1 Al... Y S% 38 • J. 2*V 9 6 10 '06 UTTY OF MAPLEMOOD 40"81. 40.8 39 1 41 01/16/96 ---------- K F J -0: OU TER )I"IAI L T C) OL E-5 F: A (H) E 2 3 34 *)OLS, MALL TT . %:) • 5 .. 49 (34.40 4 do 71 5 6 I:..: rz �, 231528 01/1.6/96 450300 ur 1%. (JBI*'*(*%I:Z]:I::,'T*]:(:)1-41: & MI-EMBE R1 %1-1:1: FIS 7 8 101 NAME% ' .ff 110 19 A? ? 39 01/16/96 470700 Z.) L I LI-JE I NEWS"PAP-EIRS ) ADcS% (3*YVI TEC-4-1 AMOUNT 491.40 40 - n 5 S DC Al s M. mTrer OF -M! -- m - -f6TVrT(AP-T--1..- On 71 �41 r .. 135.. 72 53 12 13 12 . - A.-T , � 01 /1 6/96 50031 1`1 to 0 to VI to A" %:)%tjl FWL.J.I: 0 vl:: * 1.4 1 C L. E. 267..1.2 54 5 14 55 ----- - T r - A -^- - -- ---- -- - -a ff . - �%F F1 A R 25..00 25.00 .9 15 16 14 0 1 I 1. 6196 5006'%50 11"R.- F A. % VB TEAM W/IIRI:**A :L v 17 15 2 %, 5 0 S 01/1.6/96 220300 DU NN Al... 1: C E* TIRAVED & TRA11,43:116 869.. 00 (369.00 1 19 46 %- I (ES, 1.6.. 15 1.6.1.5 1 17 23) 509 01/16/96 231',525 %S y S T E ITI CS s I N(% ANNUAL SOFTWARE ' 60 20 4- 18 2 01/1.6/96 51.1-060 lyl A R 1) 0 14 11,4 I< %c)%t.)F:,F:*(:)FZ*T* 10,72,5.00 10-1725.00 22 g p %T%5 I T--O T*7T-6 7 Y 6 24D37Z5 CY ET M FE R - AFI**ARATUS MAINTO - -R ... - T U-1 T 409--30 409.30 63 23 I f� 2 35:16 01/1.6/96 ,`6 23 5 1. 8 01-11.6196 27 25 & VIA f-TUVEI-4:1 C•E 403.55 26 A p 467. Ir, en 7 28 J. -129 TFI-T-7VI .. . .. 717 _5 30 % ):L 0 7,5 0 (30VERNMENT F-rNoNCE: % K 0 ...... ---- --------- FEE /BUDGET AWAFUX: PROC 31 RE V E: W 275.00 27%5., 00 3202250 (33RAPis DAVE TE: YOUTH & J • JAN KAFO) 309.00 35 29 SO [-I P-1 M J. I F-1 ti L. t*. B L .1 N (33 (.-' JR *70c) - - eDe) JU 37 -4o 23%1:122 01-/1.6/96 390300 % 3* NDUISTR1 Al... Y S% 38 • 40"81. 40.8 39 1 .921 `2 6 01/16/96 401250 J:I M VIATC61-1 %S );A! .. FKS C1 )I"IAI L T C) OL E-5 40 41 34 *)OLS, MALL TT . %:) • 5 .. 49 (34.40 4 2 43 do 71 44 45 �, 231528 01/1.6/96 450300 1%. (JBI*'*(*%I:Z]:I::,'T*]:(:)1-41: & MI-EMBE R1 %1-1:1: FIS 4610, 40.00 40.00 A? ? 39 01/16/96 470700 Z.) L I LI-JE I NEWS"PAP-EIRS ) ADcS% (3*YVI TEC-4-1 491.40 491.40 40 - n ,10 S DC Al s M. mTrer OF -M! -- m - -f6TVrT(AP-T--1..- On 71 �41 53 4 ,, 2 3 •: + •.:_ 1 01 /1 6/96 50031 1`1 to 0 to VI to A" % SUBSC & ME VIBE:Rc%F-IIF:et*% 0 54 5 0 25..00 25.00 .9 23532 0 1 I 1. 6196 5006'%50 11"R.- F A. % VB TEAM W/IIRI:**A 5, 45 %.) 869.. 00 (369.00 46 %- I (ES, 47 M,CTOF�y 6D to Oy 60 48 23 53 '5 01/1.6/96 51.1-060 lyl A R 1) 0 14 11,4 I< ... 1 113 1-4 1. 14 G . 7 to %) 61 62 1, 409--30 409.30 63 23536 01/16/96 520500 J MCGRYERE., 111CHAEL C A F A I L..(:)WAN(:O%E:* .64 65 511[ .. ` I Al 450.00 450.100 C, 6 r, 7 .. to 17 M 5 T roe 9 541 2353f.) 01/16/96 53073:1. F'6I:::GP%3*T*F::R (SMSTE:111113 PITIJENT .1 70 23..54 71 MA 273 72 2-197..46 171 2 3 1%5 3 9 /1 6/96 C*111LDRENS Rr-::(:% 0 %J CTR VCIR TAPE 73 174 ,c..,:} 5 4 0 01/1-6/96 :-5401.75 lyl':X)Wl::*':%*T* COCA • .... C01 ... A 1307*1*1 ... 3: N C' CO. 201100 7 �r) .20 to 00 7� 76 7.7 PROG)RIAM r am low ITILTIt 207.20 132. 50 339"70 � ' crr/ n� wum nmflnn ILI ILI IMFWI M bA IRA |75�r —35 00------'------�` uTzL.zTzsa ��V.mV 394.40 ^= ' NAME" T 34 C 10 T " T . 324.39 3211..39 Tr 67 ILI ILI IMFWI M bA IRA |75�r —35 00------'------�` uTzL.zTzsa ��V.mV 394.40 ^= ' OM.. �:JF1Jt:.i• IFt ::� 1:.:1: t�Y t:l � v _)F:,I...F::6�,1t:3t:31f} 1 F�'s�1t:;C :: �� 2 '��:3UC l�t.�CIAI :::C*l K 1�41:�ty 1 :3'Y'I:::l Iq .. 51 6 :1 t.l t:.l••I 1 :: F / :,; •r� :i. 'r ..: vr -- -- -- e cK � .1i�lX {I: ::I ": I�ll.11�lX {l : ::rt I�I�at�ll : :: DE 13% C P 1: FIT 1: 0 N AlYl #:31.lN �1fY lc:Jl.a��•r ,t Q {..,.:�,. �5.. ♦r .1.. yl l it [ 7 ♦},. ,.} ,� ,. }l.�) I!:{'j 1 1 "1t � 1 l � I 1 "f! 1 {•� �:} P1:.•f _S .... r : ::l••I :l: C . L ' 2 7 I::•I... : I : I : : - c" .... v 1 ::-*!••i :I: C.l ... I : :: ,f �:.,�.�' # :3 }1.:1.�,r�> # :3i:I.;� f:�Yf Y'1 : ::fYlfa s:�1.1l�:.l::.I ... Y., :1:i�! . n ;: t:3i� "1� ":I:C.l: ;;� �. t t:� ..,... { r;► �:� 1. ,�..,. 1c .�..3 5(: ,�.. .. ♦} I .f. S 6 #3 r 0 � ... ". . .. ...I 1.11 AF I V%Ii.; ::..: r _ � - �.;� .� .� t F 111.�I...I�F: PHONE Jti'I• ! ! f, f. _ _ � ti , 88 22 E 38 21 i 2[ 2, ,5 7 0 1/ 1 6/96 r �0� }5:� 1.li�t .1. 1: :.! • ti .i. �'Y t .31 - • M l l-4N[::.{ a tJ' T'A 'T'l' r ! . l. !` #: 5 0 . 00 1 %5 r 2c ��� 5E.I s r,} :f. / 1. � S)6 t�� 1 ���}�� 1.1���F�'N F� lY� :�: x }la,{�:�� :a�r' �.���� ::� �.t:� N { a1.)F:'F:'t E :c% .... r: : :C l.� :I: I: �'IYIr:::l�!`r #:3 #:3 „ 22 . •:Y �� r., 2E ..� 3�•. u 2 :1. t 21 '"'t c:' T. T 7 `ry a 7 V % :v ) 0 5 :- 5 G� :� ::. •� :i W . ;:i�:l:T� `' : �'% i 1 � _._ _ _ �. . __ _ f �^-�-�- '! • i �._ 2E q 4 t 2 , * .1 ,y 2 01 /16/96 950326 6 ' ItJ D F' ClO 1� l... 0C l�I: R' F•'t'�; {.l#:II•+ AVI {: }1.! {•:'I °: i....1.1:. {:i r 3C 448..0 3 2 -- �. 33 34 *r'c:�'r' � :I" ET. l <# $2-86 36 38 39 40 41 42_ 43 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 53 54 55 56 57 58 _._ 59 60 61 62 63 64 �.. 65 66 67 69 70 71 — - - - -- - - - - -- -- — — — -- -- - - - -. _ — — _ _ _ - - - - -- — —_ _ .� .— -- - - -- _— — 72 - - - -- — — — _ -- - -- — -- �_. 73 74 75 OM.. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD EMPLOYEE NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSTT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT � 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT. 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT ; 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT' 01/12/96 DIRECT DEPOSIT, 01/12/96 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT ALLENSPACH,SHERRY 309.77 CARLSON,THERESE 1 BODINE,RENEE 1,120.31 FAUST,DANIEL F 2 ANDERSON,CAROLE J 1 DEHN,DEBORAH 670.08 GIBBS,MARGARET 245.94 HANGSLEBEN,RICHARD 1 KLAGER,WENDY 1 VIGNALO,DELORES A 1 BEHM ,LOIS 1 CARLE,JEANETTE E 1 1 2 39.45 JAGOE,CAROL 1 OLSON,SANDRA 753.73 FULLER, ELAINE 717.18 POWELL, PHILIP 1 ALDRIDGE, MARK 1 64 9. 2 2 BECKER, RONALD D 2 BOHL,JOHN C 1 FLOR,TIMOTHY 1 KVAM,DAVID 2 STEFFEN,SCOTT L 2, 027.57 YOUNGREN,JAMES 2 EVERSON , PAUL 21021.31 2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS.REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME w�w�wwrwwwwwww� .ww..wwwww.w.r.ww. AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 FRAS ER , JOHN '2 , 18 9. 4 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 SAUNDERS , SARAH 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 ADELSON , LINDA 988, DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 S TAHNKE ,JULIE A 1 6 8 2.7 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 HAIDER, KENNETH G 2 , 591. 4 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/ LUNDSTEN , LANCE 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 OSWALD, ERICK D 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DU CHARME , JOHN 1, 3 7 8.71 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 MATTHY S , RUS S 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 PECK , DENNI S L 1, 6 21.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 ' ANDERSON , BRUCE 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 BURKE , MYLES R 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 MARUSKA , MARK A 1, 8 3.5.9 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 GREW HAYMAN , JANET M 7 3 0. 9 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01 / 12 / 9 6 BARTA ,MARIE 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 COLEMAN , MEL I NDA 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT, 01/12/96 EKSTRAND , THOMAS G 1, 6 3 3.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT; 01/12/96 ROBERTS , KENNETH 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 STAPLES , PAULINE 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT ` 01/12/96 ANDERSON ,MICHAEL 560.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT.' 01/ EASTMAN THOMAS E 1 8 0 2.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 OLSON , RONALD J 1 2 2 4.31 DIRECT DEPOSIT. 01/12/96 RYMER STEPHEN ► 1 0 4 3. 5 , 1 2 3 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER �.��ww DATE ww�.�wwww EMPLOYEE NAME ww�w�w�wwwwwwwwwwww�wwwwwwww�w AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/1,2/96 wwwwww��wwwwwww�.w� RATHBURN , RODNEY 453,71 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 HURLEY , STEPHEN 11683-44 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 PRI EFER , LORI 58-50 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01 / 12/96 COLEMAN , PHILIP 306.05 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 EDGE , DOUGLAS 11334 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 CRO S S ON ,LINDA 989.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 HOSCH,JESSICA 108.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 SCHONES , DUSTIN 132.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 LIVINGSTON , JOYCE L 635.10 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN 1 1 043-51 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 - KNAUSS , PETER 728.29 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 SALITROS , DARLENE 549.01 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/12/96 CURT I S, CARL D. 1,032.29 4.9834 01/12/96 BASTIAN,GARY W 352.04 49835 01/12/96 CARLSON,DALE 309.77 49836 01/12/96 KOPPEN,MARVIN 309.77 49837 01/12/96 ROSSBACH,GEORGE 309977 49838 01/12/96 CASAREZ,GINA 1 49839 01/12/9.6 DAWSON,CRAIG W 21060.00 49840 01/12/96 HENSLEY,PATRICIA 34.86 49841 01/12/96 LE,SHERYL 21173.72 49842 01/12/96 MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A 7 49843 01/12/96 ZICK,LINDA 52 9.00 3 CHECK NUMBER 49844 49845 49846 49847 49848 49849 49850 49851 49852 49853 49854 49855 49856 49857 49858 49859 49860 49861 49862 49863 49864 49865 49866 49867 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 01/12/96 HAMPTON,ROBERT W 28.50 01/12/96 CUDE,LARRY J 337.60 01/12/96 MIKISKA,WILLIAM 210.40 01/12/96 OSTER,ANDREA J 1 01/12/96 DeBILZAN,JUDY 473.49 01/12/96 MATHEYS,ALANA K 1 01/12/96 AURELIUS,LUCILLE E 2 01/12/96 FRY,PATRICIA 870.29 01/12/96 JOHNSON,BONNIE 659.94 01/12/96 KELSEY,CONNIE L 915.90 01/12/96 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1 01/12/96 COLLINS,KENNETH V 2 01/12/96 MARTINSON,CAROL F 1 01/12/96 PALANK,MARY KAY 1 01/12/96 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1 01/12/96 RYAN ,MICHAEL 2 01/12/96 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1 01/12/96 PALMA,STEVEN 1 01/12/96 ARNOLD,DAVID L 2 01/12/96 BAN ICK,JOHN J 1 01/12/96 BELDE,STANLEY 1 01/12/96 BOWMAN,RICK A 1 01/12/96 DREGER,RICHARD C 2 01/12/96 DUNN,ALICE 1 4 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 5 CHECK CHECK NUMBER ------ - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME -------- - - - - -- AMOUNT 49868 01/12/96 HERBERT,MICHAEL J 2 49869 01/12/96 HIEBERT,STEVEN 1 49870 01/12/96 LANG,RICHARD J 1 49871 01/12/96 MOESCHTER,RICHARD M 25 49872 01/12/96 MORELLI,RAYMOND J 3 49873 01/12/96 NELSON,ROBERT D 2 49874 01/12/96 RAZSKAZOFF,DALE 1 49875 01/12/96 SKALMAN,DONALD W 2 49876 01/12/96 STAFNE,GREGORY L 2 49877 01/12/96 STILL,VERNON T 1 49878 01/12/96 STOCKTON,DERRELL T 1 49879 01/12/96 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 1 49880 01/12/96 THIENES,PAUL 1 49881 01/12/96 WATCZAK,LAURA 1 49882 01/12/96 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 1,743.51 49883 01/12/96 ANDREWS,SCOTT A 2 49884 01/12/96 BERGERON,JOSEPH A 1 49885 01/12/96 DOWDLE,VIRGINIA ' 2 49886 01/12/96 HEINZ,STEPHEN J 1 1 987.09 49887 01/12/96 JOHNSON,KEVIN 2 49888 01/12/96 KARIS,FLINT D 2 49889 01/12/96 MEEHAN,JAMES 1 49890 01/12/96 MELANDER,J'ON A 1 1 876.31 49891 01/12/96 RABBETT,KEVIN 2 5 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD D CHECK CHECK NUMBER w.�ww��wwrr�ww DATE w.rwww�ww EMPLOYEE NAME wwwwrwww�wwwwwwwwwww�wwwww AMOUNT 49892 01/12/96 .ww�rww THOMALLA,DAVID J wwwwww`. � ww � wwwwww . 2 49893 01/12/96 VORWERK,ROBERT E 1 49894 01/12/96 HEWITT,JOEL A 959.45 49895 01/12/96 EMBERTSON,JAMES M 1 49896 01/12/96 WILLIAMS,DUANE J 5,502.57 49897 01/12/96 BOYER,SCOTT K 2 49898 01/12/96 FEHR,JOSEPH 1 49899 01/12/96 FLAUGHER,JAYME L 1 49900 01/12/96 HALWEG,KEVIN R 2 49901 01/12/96 LAFFERTY, WALTER 1 49902 01/12/96 PETERS,JILL 1 49903 01/12/96 RABINE,JANET L 1 49904 01/12/96 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1 49905 01/12/96 KIRWIN,HELENE 486.26 49906 01/12/96 DARST,JAMES 1 49907 01/12/96 FREBERG,RONALD L 1 49908 01/12/96 HELEY,RONALD J 1 49909 01/12/96 KANE,MICHAEL R 1 49910 01/12/96 LUTZ,DAVID P 1 49911 01/12/96 MEYER,GERALD W 1 49912 01/12/96 NAGEL,BRYAN 1 49913 01/12/96 RUNNING, ROBERT 674.07 49914 01/12/96 ELIAS,JAMES G 1 49915 01/12/96 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 1 D CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 7 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 49916 01/12/96 PRIEBE,WILLIAM 1 49917 01/12/96 BRENNER,LOIS J 1 49918 01/12/96 KRUMMEL,BARBARA A 647.78 49919 01/12/96 ANDERSON,ROBERT S 1 49920 01/12/96 GERNER,RAYMOND 225.00 49921 01/12/96 HELEY,ROLAND B 1 49922 01/12/96 HINNENKAMP,GARY 1 49923 01/12/96 KIESLING,FRANCES M 255.00 49924 01/12/96 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 1 49925 01/12/96 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 1,338.71 49926 01/12/96 SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES 1 49927 01/12/96 HORSNELL,JUDITH A 829.24 49928 01/12/96 HUTCHINSON,ANN E 1 49929 01/12/96 KUNDE,MARGARET 168.75 49930 01/12/96 MACY,RITA 24.00 49931 01/12/96 NELSON,JEAN 832.82 49932 01/12/96 MISKELL,NANCY 561.60 49933 01/12/96 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1 49934 01/12/96 ERICSON,JAMES 170.63 49935 01/12/96 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1 49936 01/12/96 OSTROM,MARJORIE 1 49937 01/12/96 WENGER,ROBERT J 1 49938 01/12/96 ANDERSON,BERNARD 208.80 49939 01/12/96 BUCKINGHAM,PAUL 80.00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD E'3 CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 49940 01/12/96 FEELY,ERIC P 99.00 49941 01/12/96 LACKTORIN,JOSH R 214.50 49942 01/12/96 LEE,JOSHUA 144.08 49943 01/12/96 LINN,MATTHEW 0 30.00 49944 01/12/96 LYSTIG,JOHN 232.63 49945 01/12/96 MACK,DAN 80.00 49946 01/12/96 RYMER,MARC 80.00 49947 01/12/96 SVENDSEN,BRIAN 158.20 49948 01/12/96 WARD,ROY G 476.00 49949 01/12/96 BREHEIM,ROGER W 1 49950 01/12/96 EDSON,DAVID B 1 49951 01/12/96 GERMAIN,DAVID 1 49952 01/12/96 NADEAU,EDWARD A 1 49953 01/12/96 NORDQUIST,RICHARD 1 49954 01/12/96 THOMAS JR, STEVEN 1 49955 01/12/96 ATKINS,KATHERINE 596.19 49956 01/12/96 BARTEL,DENISE 1,296.31 49957 01/12/96 COONS,MELISSA 545.16 49958 01/12/96 DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M 1 49959 01/12/96 ESTEVEZ,DIANE 227.80 49960 01/12/96 GLASS,JEAN 559.02 49961 01/12/96 GRAF,MICHAEL 602.91 49962 01/12/96 HOIUM, SHEILA 350.89 49963 01/12/96 HUGHES, JILL 91.80 E'3 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD A CHECK CHECK NUMBER ������wrr�www DATE �www+wrwww EMPLOYEE NAME + rwww ww"rwwwwwww�wwrrwwwwwwwwwwww AMOUNT 49964 01/12/96 KELLY,LISA wwwwww� wwwwwwwww� w 474.43 49965 01/12/96 LARSON,TESSA 52.00 49966 01/12/96 MEINKE,JENNY 175.51 49967 01/12/96 PETERSON,KAYLENE 481.01 49968 01/12/96 PETERSON,RICHARD 492.57 49969 01/12/96 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 289.00 49970 01/12/96 WARMAN,ROBIN 595.06 49971 01/12/96 ARCAND,CHRIS A 60.13 49972 01/12/96 BADEN,MATHIAS 132.00 49973 01/12/96 BASTIAN,ALEX 151.13 49974 01/12/96 CHAPMAN,JENNY A 150.00 49975 01/12/96 DAVIS,WENDY 381.08 49976 01/12/96 DOTSON,ALISHA 395.35 49977 01/12/96 FLANAGAN,MICHAEL D 72.00 49978 01/12/96 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 36.00 49979 01/12/96 IKHAML,JOHN 419.36 49980 01/12/96 JENSEN,MATTHEW 526.16 49981 01/12/96 JOHNSON,JESSICA 480.05 49982 01/12/96 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 39.00 49983 01/12/96 KASMARIK,DANIELLE M 90.00 49984 01/12/96 KAUFMAN,GINA 424.45 49985 01/12/96 KLETT,ANNA 238.56 49986 01/12/96 KOEHNEN,MARY B 54.00 49987 01/12/96 KRAEMER,JILL 482.75 A CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 10 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER _----- - - - - -- DATE __ - - - - -_ EMPLOYEE NAME ___________ ___---------- AMOUNT 49988 01/12/96 - - - - -- ---___.-_--___- KULLANDER,CHRISTINE - - - -- 210.00 49989 01/12/96 LIVINGSTON,KELLY 371.75 49990 01/12/96 MAJKOZAK,MICHELLE 72.00 49991 01/12/96 MARUSKA,ERICA 105.00 4.9992 01/12/96 MICHEL,MOLLY 198.00 49993 01/12/96 MIERSCH,JEFFREY 42.00 49994 01/12/96 MCQUILLAN,ANNE S 240.00 49995 01/12/96 NORTHQUEST,JONEEN L 60.00 49996 01/12/96 PEGO,JOHN M 123.50 49997 01/12/96 PLACHECKI,MELISSA J 30.00 49998 01/12/96 POWERS,JESSICA _ 361.76 49999 01/12/96 SELIN,JONATHAN 177.00 50000 01/12/96 SIVERSON,OLAF L 150.00 50001 01/12/96 SMITLEY,SHARON L 18.00 50002 01/12/96 SURFACE,SAMUEL 213.00 50003 01/12/96 SWANER,JESSICA 51.00 50004 01/12/96 THIBODEAU,KELLY M 547.25 50005 01/12/96 WARNER,KARLEEN 21.00 50006 01/12/96 WEDES,CARYL H 36.00 50007 01/12/96 WESTBERG,MELINDA 121.00 50008 01/12/96 BOSLEY,CAROL 110.50 50009 01/12/96 CASEY,CATHLEEN 32.00 50010 01/12/96 CHRISTENSEN,JODIE 214.31 50011 01/12/96 FRANK,LAURA 127.50 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 11 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 50012 01/12/96 GOSSMAN,SAUNDRA 13.50 50013 01/12/96 JOHNSON,ARIEL 16.88 50014 01/12/96 LEHNEN,LORI 81.00 50015 01/12/96 OLEARY,VIRGINIA 72.50 50016 01/12/96 SAGER,TENA 140.06 50017 01/12/96 SANCHEZ,HELEN 40.20 50018 01/12/96 SATTLER,KRISTIN 56.00 50019 01/12/96 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 199.50 50020 01/12/96 SWANSON,KARI 148.50 50021 01/12/96 ANDERSON,MICHELE 225.00 50022 01/12/96 AUER,DANIEL 387.45 50023 01/12/96 BAILEY,DEANNA L 118.25 50024 01/12/96 BEHAN,JAMES 987.51 50025 01/12/96 CHRISTENSEN,JANET 354.04 50026 01/12/96 ERSFELD,ALICE L 82.50 50027 01/12/96 HURT, CAROL J 150.00 50028 01/12/96 JAHN,DAVID J 1 50029 01/12/96 JAQUES,THOMAS 196.88 50030 01/12/96 KELLY,CASEY 114.00 50031 01/12/96 LATHAM,BETTY 432.91 50032 01/12/96 MILLS,DEREK 214.50 50033 01/12/96 MOSS,STEPHANIE E 91.50 50034 01/12/96 SCHLINGMAN,PAUL 1,476.23 50035 01/12/96 SWANSON,LYLE 11340.84 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD EMPLOYEE NAME rr- SWANSON,VERONICA MULVANEY,DENNIS M SPREIGL,GEORGE C 12 AMOUNT 802,13 1,491.51 1,393.11 TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS 305,928.91 CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 50036 01/12/96 50037 01/12/96 50038 01/12/96 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD EMPLOYEE NAME rr- SWANSON,VERONICA MULVANEY,DENNIS M SPREIGL,GEORGE C 12 AMOUNT 802,13 1,491.51 1,393.11 TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS 305,928.91 AGENDA NO AGENDA REPORT Action by Council Endorsed TO: City Manager Modifie Rejectec* FROM: Finance Director Date RE: AMBULANCE BILL - APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION DATE: January 11, 1996 An application for cancellation of an ambulance bill has been received from James Gorbunow. This individual was taken to Ramsey Medical Center on June 23, 1995, and was suffering from complications of diabetes. The information submitted with his application for cancellation indicates his monthly income is $450 -$550 and he is not covered under his medical insurance for any diabetes related illnesses as it is considered a pre- existing condition on his policy. The application is attached for the Council's review. rb C: VVTWIN60 \AMB\GORVUNOW.AGN APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF PARAMEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE CHARGES s NAME OF APPLICANT: u /9 l.�w�ww_1..rwp .�Iwrw��..�� !• 35/ ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: P n .36 5 CITY : to L;- - , STATE . �� � h i�w�..._ri�a...�pw_. ZIP . 0 "..- � 7 PAT I ENT' S NAME e S G e. b a 0 e-1,0 DATE OF SERVICE _ - � X66 In AMOUNT OF CHARGES REQUESTED TO BE CANCELLED: 4 � %40 REASON FOR REQUEST -CHECK ONE: 1. Financial Hardship (fill out reverse side): 2. Other: e nwsc L. Ila ct 45c) J 1� �j4G� LOU S'IJ�Je red �NtG�er� ���vl v Med. � ns. l� ova L) v C&-yal's oa_ n I certify that the income information I have supplied on this application is true and accurate. I also certi that the requested amount of the charges . 9 q to be cancelled are not covered by Medical assistance, worker's compensation, Medicare, health insurance or auto insurance. Signed: Date: j 71 INCOME INFORMATION "INCOME means any amount received from the following sources by any Resident: • Any Public Assistance, including but • Salaries, including commissions, bonuses, not limited to Welfare, AFDC, SSI, and overtime pay and tips .Unemployment Compensation • Interest and Dividends • Pensions and Annuities, including PERA and Social Security • Rental income • Estate or Trust income • Business Profit - -for self - employed individuals, including Farmers Gain from the sale of property or securities • Payments received from properties being sold on Contracts for Deed • VA Educational Grants List all residents of your household. Include yourself. Include their ages and their incomes (if any): I) Income listed should include all income which your household can reasonable expect to receive during the next .12 months. 2) "RESIDENT" means any person, other than a renter, living in the household for at least 9 months of the year or a person who is claimed as a dependent for income tax purposes. NAME O.F. AGE OF INCOME OF RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT SOURCE OF INCOME (per month) (including employer's address, if applicable) O CA-S r V** r 6-a LL�vN11", becl-r Aro s7D TOTAL INCOME: 4-) per month= per year AGENDA NO. 3 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director Action by Council: Endorse Modifie Rejected. Date.. RE: AMBULANCE BILL - APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION DATE: January 12, 1996 An application for cancellation of an ambulance bill has been received from Bill and Lolly Schultz. On September 24, 1995, Bill Schultz was transported to St. Johns Hospital. The original bill was $531.30 and there is a remaining balance of $281.30 after payment by their insurance. The application is attached for the Council's review. rb C:\WPWIN60\AGENDA\SCHULTZ2.JAN 1 3 APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF PARAMEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE CHARGES NAME OF APPLICANT: + Lo ; aROZ072: ADDRESS OF APPLICANT- CITY: STATE: s Z I P . S i�r PATIENT'S NAME: ZO LLJ 4;L DATE OF SERV1Ct: SE,e�T •Z y, I4�"9"� AMOUNT OF CHARGES REQUESTED TO BE CANCELLE /•3 D REASON FOR REQUEST -CHECK ONE: X_ 1. Financial Hardship (fill out reverse side): 2. Other: I certify that the income information I have sup plied on t h i s application is true and accurate. I al,s o certify that the amount of the charges requested to be cancelled are not covered by Medical assistance.., worker's compensation Medicare, health insurance or auto insurance. Signed: r,�'`� °t�` Date:/ f�r INCOME INFORMATION "INCOME means any amount received the following sources by any Resident: • Any Public Assistance, including but • Salaries, including commissions, bonuses, not limited to Welfare, AFDC, SSI, and overtime pay and tips Unemployment.Compensation • Interest and Dividends • Pensions and Annuities, including PERA and Social Security • Rental income • Estate or Trust income • Business Profit - -for self employed individuals, including Farmers'' • Gain from the sale of property or securities • Payments received from properties being, sold on Contracts for Deed • VA Educational Grants List all residents of your household. Include yourself. Include their ages and their incomes (if any): 1) Income listed should include all income which your household can reasonable expect to receive during the next 12 months. 2) "RESIDENT" means any person, other than a renter, living in the household for at least 9 months of the year, or a person who is claimed as a dependent for income tax purposes. NAME OF AGE OF INCOME OF ;70 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT SOURCE OF INCOME (per mont. (' ncluding employer's address, if applicable) J AO& ow, HO LT L $ sEooelry 40,,E aw,4vL7kw- —tlomg. C-1.4P7j0, 40 ew 1 0; 4W kinne TOTAL INCOM per month= 1 6iQ-001 a 4's per year AGENDA NO. F ' " AGENDA REPORT Action b Coun Endorsed.... Modif TO: Cit Mana Rejected Date sweaft FROM: Finance Director �., /- RE: BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT COSTS DATE: Januar 15, 1996 PROPOSAL It is proposed that an appropriation of $49,440 be made from the Sewer Fund unappropriated retained earnin to finance sewa treatment expenses for 1995. BACKGROUND The Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services Division bills the cit for sewa treatment based on estimated g allons of flow and estimated costs. At the end of each y ear, actual flow data and actual costs are used to ad the amount billed. Then each cit is either billed or credited for the difference between the initial bill and the final bill. The final, bill received for 1994 indicates that an additional amount of $48,742 is due. This is 2.40/6 of the amount paid in 1 For comparison purposes, the final bill for 1993 was a credit of $47,998 which was also 2.4% of the amount paid in 1993. The additional amount due for 1994 has been added to the 1996 bill. However, for accountin purposes it must be accrued and treated as a 1995 expense. Therefore, a bud- adjustment is needed. The onl source available to finance the additional expenses is the Sewer Fund unappropriated retained earnin RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that an appropriation of $49,440 be made from the Sewer Fund unappropriated retained earnin to finance sewa treatment expenses for 1995. CAWPW1N601AGN1SEWER95.WPD Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorse Modif ied....�... TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts Associate Planner e� ecte �..-_. SU BJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review -- Maplewood Toyota Tate p Y DATE: January 5, 1996 INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit (CUP) at 2873 Highway 61 North is due for review. The CUP allowed for the expansion of a nonconforming use in a shoreland zone. Maplewood Toyota is on this site. See the maps on pages 2-4. BACKGROUND January 9, 1995: The city council granted the CUP and approved the building addition design. Refer to the minutes on page 5. DISCUSSION Maplewood Toyota is meeting all fou conditions the council set for this CUP. They finished their building addition in 1995. The city council should grant an indefinite approval and review this permit only if a problem arises. RECOMMENDATION Review the co nditional use permit at 2873 Highway 61 only if a problem arises. p:sec4ltoyota2.cup Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. CUP Conditions dated 1 -9 -95 Attachment 1 - 61 VjWWS HE7G a, *4 f • , • • r• —00 Poo.** *too 0 4w • 00 • • • • • • i • • • . • .. ... a lb 0 ago • Covtcy n. U was t • . Q cn 4. u t 2• 1 S�iirtM(T CT. •.. Z. COUNTRYVIEW CIR. s'T �,. • • '�' '� . 3 ♦ . lam► ST. BEAM k 4 o •. • w H • c`T • Ww�icl�c p Z Pa Koh irma W L Gervi s �lv v Loka � K OHLMM AVE. f C Co uNTY ROAD C AD 23 sl PALM �' z W 0j, v CT. P 3 CONNOR Ca N 0 AVE • CT. Di ROOKS a AVE. .. a w iA. I ` o BROOKS T SEX TAINT ft 12 GERVA IS •'' ' GERVAJS AVE. >- GRAWCyV'tE1At AVE. •j . Pte. vwt#C DR. .t %4ERREN AVE. K rA Con C.._....... _.� • • • } LAW A AV" LOCATION MAP _ 2 Attachment 2 �C oc c�. so 3 l N . ; .• to 40 . se 1692999 F r• N bo ,r • T 'q s9 1 t A ��� � tG S• �N Ij MAPLEWOOD TOYOTA ' 1 • � / L P PART OF Qe SQ 3± 44 / 8S5 r L 92 0.3) � � r PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Q 3 N ' 13s Attachment 3 BEAM AVENUE III PROPOSED SHOWROOM ADDITION, F/ 7 Z XAPLZWOOD — { - TOYOTA �• ': ~• l� •.rte �.� .��� �� • � "1/ LL J z v � 4 SITE PLAN 4 4 N Attachment 4 1. The use would be located designed. maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the Ci ty s Comprehensive Plan and Code of ordinances. 20 The.. use would not change the existing or planned character of the P surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 40 The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of P excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 56 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets .and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existin 9 or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services, 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal. adverse environmental effects, val is subject to the following conditions: . All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the City. The Director of Community Development may es. approve minor changes, 9 . The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of Council approval or the permit shall end. The Council may extend this deadline for one year. The City Council shad l review this permit in one year, Beam Avenue shall not be used for loading or unloading. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Koppen Nays - Council members Al l enspach, Rossbach Design Review i . Council member Koppen moved to approve the 21 an stamped September 26, 1994 for a 1 404 - s uare - foot addition to Ma l ewood Toyota, subject to the f i ndi n s reguired b the Code. and sub 'ect to the fol 1 owi n conditions: 5 1 -9.9F F--w6 'a. ) .? el f o un c i ."i. MOdifi . MEMORANDUM ReJ ecte . ...... Dat TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager FROM: Melinda Coleman, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Board of Appeals- Dissolution Date: January 10, 1996 INTRODUCTION At the October 23, 1995, city council meeting, the city appointed a Board of Appeals with respect to the Stefan /Larson Associates request. They requested an appeal to a code interpretation made by the Maplewood building official requiring an elevator with a retail space expansion at the Corner Kick Indoor Soccer Center. The board was appointed and consisted of the following individuals: John. Gaspar, Architect; Kenneth Mihelich, 3M Building Code Specialist, and Kenneth Nordby, President N.A.I. Architects. The Board of Appeals met on November 8, 1995, to hear testimony by Tim Stefan, proponent, and Marge Ostrom and Duane Grace who represented the city. The- board did not make their decision until a later date, but did find that the elevator was not needed with this project. Their decision was sent to. the State of Minnesota Building Code .Division and they have concurred with the Board of Appeals. RECOMMENDATION Since this matter has been resolved, the city council should now dissolve the Board of Appeals. Staff was pleased with the manner in which the Board addressed this issue and will formally express our gratitude to the members for their service. Agenda No. r4w I AGENDA REPORT Acti by C ouno i l Endorse d.�..�.�. DATE: January 16, 1996 Modified - Bejeated —= TO: City Manager Date -- FROM: Human Resource Director t) SUBJECT: Holiday Differential for Temporary /Seasonal Employees With the opening of the Community Center, we are now in a position where one of our facilities is open during some major holidays. Although union employees receive holiday premium pay when working on holidays, temporary and seasonal employees do not. In order to keep costs down at the Community Center, we have attempted to staff the Community Center with temporary and seasonal employees to the extent possible and practical. These employees are scheduled to work on holidays but receive no additional pay for doing so. We have been having a lot of difficulty trying to find staff coverage on certain days. Most of these days are traditional holidays but some are just days associated with holidays where most of the workforce prefers not to work. These days include: New Year's Eve, New Year's Day, Memorial Day, the 4th of July and the day after Thanksgiving. We propose a holiday differential of $2 per hour to be used only on the days listed above. This differential would apply only to temporary and seasonal staff who are required to work on these days. RECOMMENDATION Please establish a $2 per hour differential for temporary and seasonal employees who are required to work on New Year's Eve, New Year's Day, Memorial Day, the 4th of July and the day after Thanksgiving. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Railroad Lease Buyout DATE: January 17, 1996 Introduction Action by Council :a End.®rse Modifie Rejecte Date The Union Pacific Railroad has offered a buyout from existing leases paid annually by the City for utility crossing and encroachments in railroad right -of -way. Back During 1987 the City agreed to three leases with the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company. The leases were for two water main crossings and a parallel occupation of our sanitary sewer main in railroad right -of -way in the area east of McKnight road and north of Maryland Avenue. All three leases require an annual payment and are subject to revision on any anniversary billing date. Both water main leases were initially $180.00 per year, and the sanitary sewer main lease was $265.00 per year. The annual payments have since escalated to $225.00 for each water main and $450.00 for the sanitary sewer main per year or increases of 25% and 70% respectively. The Chicago and Northwestern was recently acquired by the Union Pacific Railroad Company which has offered the lease buyout. The lease buyout offer would amend our original lease by eliminating the annual lease payments. The one -time payment consists of $475.00 for each water main and $4,500.00 for the sanitary sewer main, or a total of $5,450.00. Since we have no control over future annual payments due to the escalation clause originally agreed to, the buyout offer is attractive. The one -time fee of $4,500.00 for the sanitary sewer main may appear to be high in relation to the water main buy -out, but the sanitary sewer main is not a simple crossing, but is actually in railroad right -of -way and includes three man holes. Recommendation It is recommended that council approve by resolution the buy -out offer from the Union Pacific Railroad Company through amendment of existing leases. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE LEASE AMENDMENT WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Y, Minnesota, has previously entered into lease agreements with the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company which call for annual lease payments for utility crossings and railroad right -of -way encroachments. WHEREAS, The Union Pacific Railroad Company, successor company of the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company, now wishes to amend the lease agreement through a one -time buyout in lieu of annual lease payments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: That for a one -time buyout fee in the amount of $5,450.00, leases 90227, 90252 and 90311 shall be amended to eliminate the annual lease payments and the amendments are hereby approved for execution by the Mayor and city clerk. J N r'l 1 F- F: FF'f 1 [1 U F'RF , �- C - ; -.� .-, _ _ rJT— F'EHI� E'..T T _ '� 1 F, 1 ;'t_ °1 ict_-1F, F'H�:'E . tDC - -: t -1%11 t SUPPAGR. DOC 900101 Aua No. C&NW 9027 Form ApprovecL A VP -Law FlAder No. 624-94 UPPLEME TAL A R ;EIYf EN'I' TM SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is made as of the day of .1199 , by and between UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD] COMFANY'� a Utah corporation, (hereinafter the LiueriS and the Cam' OF "L.EW000 a mmicipaliq• Nr•1th a marlu3g address at 1 830 East County Road B, Maplewood, MN 55109 (hereinafter the Lioffnstt). RECITALS By insrument dated January 15., 1987, the parties .hereto or their predecessors in interest (if any entered into an ap eement (herein the "Basic A.grecn -ielit ") identified as Chicago and North Western Railway Company license No. 90?27, covering the installa and marntenance of a water pipe line located at or near Maplewood, Minnesota. 'l'he parties now desire to modify the Basic Agr eement by the substitution of a one time fec in lieu of continued annual rental payments. AGREEMENT. N'L]►W, THEREFORE, TT IS AGREED by :grid between the panics hereto as follows: SECTION I - ELAMINATION OF ANNUAL, RENTAL Effective as of January 1, 1996, the Licensee agrees to pay to the Li c;crisor a one -tune fee in th sum of FOUR HUNDRED AND SEVENTY -FIVE DOLLARS ($475.44) payable in advance, in lieu of the annual rental heretofore stipulated. Effective as of January 1, 1996, the annual rental in the Basic Agreement is hereby expunged. SECTION 11 - PROTECTION OF FIB �FT'1�' CABLE SY��, ,MS (a) F ibcr optic cable systems njay be buried on the License)r's property. pr otection of the fiber optic cable systen s is of extreme Importance smcc any brew- could disrupt service to timers resultlrlg in business intc;rruption and loss j revenues and. profits. Licer shall telephone the Licenser at 1- 800 -:336 -9193 (a 24 -hour dumber) to dct.crrninc if fiber optic cable is buried anywhere on the Licensor's prerruscs to be used by the Licensee. If it is, Licensee Will telephone the telecommurnca.tions eompany(ies) invok!ed, arrange for a cable locator, and make xTangements for relocation or other protection of the fiber optic cable prior to beginning auy work on. the Licensor's prennise5. (b) La addition to other indermlity provisions of this /a - eeme t, the Licerisce shall ind emnify and hold the Lict;n��r harmlc�: from and against all costs, hability, and exT se whatsoe.�, ('Inc:luding. without Iinlitati� �n, attorney's fees, and court costs and expenscs) arising out of any act or onZission of the Licensee, its contractor, agents and/o employees, that causes or oontributes to (1) any damage to o d cstruction of any tclec ommuuications system inn Licensor's proper, and (2) any injury to or death of any person employed by or on behalf of any telecommunications co and/or it`s cotitract.or, agents or employees, on Lictimr's property. Licensee shall not have: Or seek reCoUrse against Licensor for an claim or ca use of action for alleged loss of profits or revenue or loss of �rvicc or Other consequential dar -x.age ti a telecommunication c;ompanN using 111 ensor's property or a cc wstomer or user of sert'ic: es of the fiber optic cable on Liccnsor's property. 624- 94.sup Artidt) %, 4Agrcvmcrit J2nuwy 16, 1996 Pagc 1 of 2 I — I -, C, I r-i u P F-'F-.. 1-AT-REAL EST j ` t,] I R 9 F- 1 F R c. H SUPPAGIZ-00C. 900101 Forin Approved, AVP-Law aiidit No. C&NW 90:217 Folder No. 6-214 SECTION III - EFFECTIVE This Supplernental A shall be effective as. of Januar 1, 1996. SECTION IV - AGREJEM.ENT 5UPL This a is supplemental to the Basic A as herein amended., mid nothin herein contained shall be construed as amendin or modif the same except as hercin provided. IN VVTITq-ESS VMEREOF, the panics hcreto have c3w;ed this Supplemcntal A to be exiteute-d as o the da and y ear arse herelliabove vy-ritten. I-NION PACIFIC RAMROAD COMPANY B CONTRACTREPRESENTATIVE WIINESS.- CITY OF MAPLIEWOOD Title: T 9 1 E 1 0 P A E 0 C 624-94_,qip AAAcles of A Jwnw 16, 1996 Pa 2 of 2 .T H FI 16 '��-. 1 �' : E FF'r_*�t�1 i_ I F`F'F' - �;i= � t - .1 T -F'EAL E T TC = '� 16 1 2 ;' ;' t�t:l5 t_6 F' . t�t t:�t� -,. C C1 SUPPAGR. DOC. 9W 10 I -ik c it No. C & NW 90252 Fom Approved. AVP -Law Foldor No, 624-95 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IBS SUIMLEMENTAII AGREENEENT is made as of the day of '199 , by and bctween UNI PACIFIC RAEUROAD C'OIV,[I'`ANY, a Utah c arporation, (hereinafter the Licen and the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a muaic;ipality tivith a mail ig adkh at 1830 Last County Road B, Maplewood, MN 55109 (herziinalter the Licensee). RECITA By m* - trument dated May 25, 1987, the partle..5 hereto or their predccessors in interest (if any), cntEred i.ato an agreement (herein the "Easic Agreement") identified as Chicago and North Westem Railway CoMpanY license Ni 90252, covering the installation and rnaiatenance of a water pipe line located at or near Maplewood, Mimi rota. T11e parties now desire to modify the Basic Agreement by the substitution of a one time fee in lieu of continued annual rental payments. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and bet wem the parties hereto as follows: SEC110N I - E1JMINAT1QN OF ANNUAL R )AL Effective as of January 1, 199ti, the Licenscc agrces to pay to the Licensor a one -firne fee in the stun of FOUR H JNDRED AND SEVENTY- -:fiTVE DOLLARS (5475.00) payable in advance, in lieu of the annu,-d rental heretofore stipulated. E ectiVt as o f January 1, 1996, the annual rental in the :B asi c; Agreement is hereby expunged. 1✓C; "r1t �l II - PROTECTION OF FIBER OJUIC. A.OLE SY$nMS (a) .f*iber optic; cable systems may be buried on the Lic;ensor's property. Protection of the fiber optic cable systems is of e:�ti zme import.,a et since any break- could disrupt Service to users resulting in b ess interruption and loss of revenue and profits. Licei shall telephone the Licenser at 1- 800 -336 -9193 (a 24 -hour number) to deter 'ne if f ber o p tic cable is buried anywhe on the Liccn.sor's prenuses to be used by the Licensee. If it is, Licerusee will telephone the telee- ornmunications company involved, arrange for a cable locator, and make arrangements for relocation or other protection of the fiber optic cable prior to beginning aria work on the Licc nsor's prem ises. (b) In addition to other indenuuty provisions of this Agreement, the Li=iscc shall and hold the Licensor harrnless from an agAirLt all costs, hability, and exq;�ens -e whats�ver (including, without I nitatiou, attorney's fees. and eot>:i't co:,N-ts and E uw_s:) ansing out of any act or omission of the Liceli , its contractor, agents and/or employees, that causes 11 or contributes to (1) any damage to or destniction of any telecomrn ruc ation5 system on Liccnsor's property, and (2) aq uijury to or death of any person empkwed by or o n behalf of an telewmmunieations company, and/or its crontraetoi•, a-gents or t on Llcensor's property. Lic;en shall ncx have or seek rewurse against Licensor for any clairzi or c aLtSe of action for alleged lc�:.s cif profits or revenue or loss of service or other conse damage to a telecomnlulucation comp using Lictnsor's property or a customer or user of services of the tip Qptic cable on Licensors property. 624 -9 4. -Rup Article, o #' A e��t'r ent Rr' 1atmary 16, x 996 Page 1. of 2 1 tit - A 1 �-; ' 1 9 F, 1 ' : FF'(- 1 1F'F'F' ���taT- -F'EHL E'=;T R SCIPPAGR. DOC, 900101 Forth Approwd, A VP Audit No. C&NW 90252 Folder No. 624-95 SECTION III - EF CT'IVE IkA 1Dus Supplemental .Agrcen, -.en,t shall be effective a` of J;inuaiy 1, 1996. SECTION IV - AGRIE.E.MENI SUPPLEMENIAL agretmcut is supplenlental to the Basic Agreement, as .h erein amended, and nothing herd containcc shall be c onstrued as arnen or modi King the same except as herein specifically provided. IN WITNESS WWREOV, the parties her have caused this Supplemental. A,greeement to L executed as of the day and year fu:st heremabove written. UNION I" ACMIC RAILROAD Cta►IVIP'ANY By : CONTRACT REPUStN MTKESS: 6 T�_:� 9 1 G 1 � ;'t�45 F' . FJC,1 tit - � , CITY OF MA -"LEW UO II x Titic: ,Ar6eles i)f A.graeawnt Page 2 of 2 kinumr4' 16, 1596 FRf 1t 1_I F'�'F' = ='�taT F'E T -� �, -.--, t1 �tt�, F L E T_ 1 1_ H. E tit 0 tat t .5UPPAGR.DO 9001 Audit No. C.&NW 90311 � Approved, AV'P -Law Folder No. 624-96 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT THIS SUPPLEIMNTAL AGREEMENT is made as. of the � day of . 1 by and between UNION PACIFIC: RAILROAD C+0►WANY, a Utah c otporation, (hereinafter the Licensor) and the CITY OF M"YEV' OOD, a mimicipahty Nvith a rnaihng ac3dYe�. at 1 830 East C.'owity Road B, Maplewood, NIN 55109 (h the RECITALS: By instn=ent elated; December 7, 1987, the parties hereto or their p redecessors in interest (if any ), eutered wto an agreement (herein the "Basic Agtxeemem") identified as Chicago and North Western .Railway Companv licensc No. x.1311, covering the installation and maintenance of a s,='t.ary 9evver pipe line. including three manholes, lvhich runs parallel to and within the railroad's right of way located at or tear MaplewoW, Minnesota. The parties now desire to modify the Basic Agreement by the substitution of a one 6m e fee .in. lieu of continued annual rental payinents. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows: SECTION I - EUMINADON F A:�. LAL RENTAL Effective as of January 1, 1996, the, Lic mste agrees to pay to the Licensor a onc: --time fee in the sum of FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($4 payable in advance, in lieu of the annual rental h eretofore Stipulated. Effective as of Jan uary 1, 19%, the annual rental in the Basic Agreement is hereby expunged. SECTION II - PROTECTION OF FIAB P`i°.IC CABLE SYSTEMS (a) Fiber optic cable syst.erns may be buried on the .Licenser's property. Protection of the fiber optic cable systems is of extreme imp )rWnce since any bream cou disrupt ser'vice to users r e,.;m lting in business interruption and loss of revenue:; xxi protit_s. Lice shall telephone the Licensor at 1 -,34U- 336 - 9 193 (a 2-=1 -hour number) to determine if fiber optic cable is buried anywhere on the L,i premises to be used by the 1_104clnsee. If it is, Licenser will telephone the telecom- niunicatlons compan involved, arrange for a cable. locator, and make arrangements for relocation or other protection of the fibct optic cable prior to begu ing any work on the Li • risor's premises. ( In addition to other inden pro-visions of this AgrcGmcnt, the Licensee Shall indemnify and hold the Licensor harml e&s .from. and against all costs, lia bility, and expense �N hatsvever• (:.including, w i thout limitation, attc fees, and cow cots and expenses) arising out of any a cct or O rmssion of the Licensee, its contt actor, agent` and/or employees, that causes or contributes to (1) any damage to or destruction of Any teleconununications system on Licensor's property, and (2) any injury to or death of any perwii employed by or on behalf of any t.elec,omrnunications company, and x its contractor, agents or eWloyees, on Licen.5or's property. L.kcensce: $hall not hav or welt rewurse against Licensor for any claim o cause of action fAx alleged loss of pi or revenue. or loss of serilic-, or other consequential damage to a v;lec or munic;ation company using Licenser's property or a c ustome r o user of sen!ices of the fiber optic cable on Licenser's property. 6Z4- 94.sup Artie:les of : -kgreernent J anuary 1 6, 1 996 P age I of 2 F . -7- 1= F R [1 T F-, E A L E T SUPPAGR-DOC 9WI01 Form Approvccd AVP-Law Audit No. CANW 90,3 1. F*Ider No. 624-96 SECTION III - E. EEECTHjE DATE This Supplemental A shall be effmtIve as of Januar I _, 1996, SECTION IV - AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL This a is supplemental to the Basic A as herein amended., and notin herein contained -shall be consaued as amendin or modifyin the same c.\'Ccpt as herein specificall pro-vided. IN WITNESS WfftREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Supplemental Agrcement to be executed as o the da and year first hercinabovt NAn'ttf,,,n. UNION PACIFJC RAJLROA.D COMPANY By: CONTRACI* P-J�PRESENTATTVt WITNESS: 624-94.sup x Title- E 0 0 0 H T 9 1 G. I L27`1-7 4 5 0 G. P CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Arbc1cs of A Pa 2 of'- jwwan- 16, 1996 * Q f -- T T A L F'H*-- *,--'I E . C,-1 0 4 :4;:::1:: ,'' :: Agenda No. F! AGENDA REPORT .t *cam. �. Endorsed, �,. DATE: January 16, 1996 Modified-, Rejeete TO: Mayor and bete A y City Council FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: NON -UNION GENERAL WAGE INCREASE The City is attempting to negotiate multi -year contracts with all bargaining units. A settlement has been reached with L.E.L.S. (Police Officers) that calls for a three year contract with no changes except a 3% COLA each year and an increase of $5 in 1996 and 1997 to deferred compensation. The Sergeants received a 3% increase in 1996. Negotiations with Metro Supervisors and AFSCME are in process. A 3% increase for non -union employees for each year (1 996 -1998) would retain internal equity among the groups. The non -union positions are: City Manager Finance Director Park & Rec Director Emergency Mgmt Dir. Administrative Asst -Pol. Community Ctr Mgr Payroll Technician (FT) RECOMMENDATIO Assistant City Manager Public Safety Director City Cleric Public Works Director Community Devel Director Police Captain Asst Emerg Mgmt Director Fire Chief MIS Coordinator Executive Secretary Fire Marshal Human Resource Director Based on current and proposed settlements with union employees, I recommend that the non -union employees receive 3% general wage increases effective 1 -1 -96, 1 -1 -97 & 1 -1 -98, except as noted below. No changes to benefits are being recommended at this time. The position of Fire Chief should not receive a 1996 adjustment as that salary was just recently set with 1996 in mind. That position is included in the 1997 and 1998 adjustment recommendation. MEMORANDUM Action by Couneil Endorse., Modif i ec ..,, ..,..,:. Re j ecte TO: City Manager t FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Date SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Change, Conditional Use Permit and Street Vacation LOCATION: 1460 Skillman Avenue PROJECT: Ismaili Muslim Community Church DATE: January 3, 1996 INTRODUCTION Ms. Val Davis, representing the .Ismaili Muslim Community Church, is asking the city to approve: 1. Aland use plan change from L (library) to C (church). (See the existing and proposed land use plan maps on pages 8 and 9 and the church's plan amendment statement on pages 12 and 13.) 2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a church. Section 36- 437(3) of the city code allows the city council to approve a CUP for a church in any zoning district. (See the church's conditional use permit statement on pages 14 and 15.) The church would be in the former Ramsey County Library building at 1460 Skillman Avenue. (See the map on page 10.) They are now meeting in a building in Saint Anthony. The church needs to move because the owner of the building they now meet in is going to demolish it. The church is not proposing any exterior building remodeling or changes now. They may do some work on the inside to make it fit their needs. Staff also is proposing the vacation of the Barclay Street right -of -way that crosses the parking lot on the site. DISCUSSION Land Use Plan Change and Conditional Use Permit The advantage of a church here is that it would create less traffic congestion than an office use or the former library. The church now has about 35 families in its membership. Thus, I expect about 35 vehicles on days of church services (mostly on Fridays and Sundays). According to the Institute of Traffic Engineers, a 7,000 square -foot (the size of the building) general office building would generate about 87 vehicle trips per day or 435 trips per week. Before the county closed the library in 1993, it generated about 2,500 visitors each month or an average of 100 visitors each day it was open. Off- street parking also is a concern with this proposal. The site plan shows 42 parking spaces on the property. With up to 35 families in the church, there should be enough parking on site. If the city approves this request, the council should review the church conditional use permit and the parking situation one year after approving it. If a parking problem develops, the council could consider parking restrictions then. Maplewood should not base its decisions about this church on the religious or cultural views of the membership. The city should only judge whether a church would be more or Less compatible with the existing and planned land uses than the former library. The proposed church meets the Maplewood City Code standards for a conditional use permit. Barclay Street Vacation Maplewood has no plans to build Barclay Street between Skillman Avenue and the DNR Gateway Trail. This is because the county had been .using this property for the parking for the library. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 17. This resolution changes the land use plan for the property at 1460 Skillman Avenue. This change is from L (library) to C (church). The city should approve this change because: 1. A church would have less affect on neighborhood traffic than an office building or the former library. 2. A church would be just as compatible as an office or library with the existing and planned land uses around this site. B. Adopt the resolution on page 18. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for a church at 1460 Skillman Avenue. The council should approve this resolution based on the findings required by the city code and with the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans the city received on November 15, 1995. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The city council must approve a conditional use permit revision for any expansion of the church building or parking lot. 2. The building must be used for a church within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The city council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. Fill any potholes in the parking lot and driveways (code requirement). 4. Sweep and restripe the parking lot to current city code requirements. 5. Remove and clean up any junk or garbage on the property. 6. The church shall keep any outdoor trash or recycling containers in a 100 percent opaque enclosure, as required by code. The design of the enclosure shall be subject to staff approval. 7. Any outside remodeling shall be subject to the approval of the community design review board and building official. Any inside remodeling shall be subject to the approval of the building official and the fire marshal. 8. The city council shall review this permit in one year. N C. Adopt the resolution. on page 20. This resolution vacates the Barclay Street right -of -way between Skillman Avenue and the DNR Gateway Trail. The city should vacate this street right -of -way because: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city has no plans to build a street in this location. 3. The adjacent properties have street access. 4. The county has been using this right -of -way for a parking lot. 3 CITIZEN COMMENTS We asked the surrounding property owners for their opinion of these requests. We sent surveys to the property owners within 350 feet of the site. Out of 51 properties, we received 23 replies. Four replies were for the requests, 13 were against, one had comments and five had no comment. For 1. It will bring diversity to the neighborhood. (Fiedler -1446 Belmont Lane). 2. ' The building will be occupied rather than standing vacant and inviting vandalism. (KJenk - 2004 Barclay Street) 3. The building will be cared for rather than standing empty. (Warner - 2012 Dieter Street) 4. I have no objection to freedom of religion, whatever denomination. (Larson - 2006 Manton) Against 1. We object to this proposal, not because of the people who wish to buy this,. but to Maplewood for not buying this and turning the building into something we all could have used. It was bad enough to lose our library, now you want to put a church there - give us a break. You could use that building for education reasons, use with the trail, a place for our teenagers or little kids to go, anything for the neighborhood. (Jelinek -1427 Skillman Avenue) 2. It may bring crime and drags into the area. Once they are here, it may be hard to have them removed. (Steiner -1431 Skillman Avenue) 3. I do not agree with the beliefs and .practices of Muslims. I do not want my children exposed to the strict practices and degradation of women. (Docker - 1473 Skillman Avenue) 4. This would not serve the immediate community but would be a burden to the surrounding residents. It will increase traffic and I also feel there is a security issue for my family with strangers meeting at a central meeting area that are not a .part of this immediate community. believe this will have a negative effect on my property value. The owner should use the property in such a way that would benefit the surrounding neighborhood or use the land for more residential lots. (Oaks - 1985 Barclay Street) 5. We are paying enough taxes for all these church businesses that are all taking in good money and paying no taxes. We have enough churches in the area already. Get someone to pay taxes or turn it over to the DNR as a very much needed resource. (Tauer - 2012 Barclay St.) 6. Parking and noise in the neighborhood. (Monette - 2060 Barclay Street) 7. Churches grow and there would be nowhere to build an additional parking areas, which would result in parking on streets. I am against this proposal. I do however feel that a branch of the library would be an excellent use for this building and would improve our community. (Tarnowski - 1428 Belmont Lane) 4 8. There would not be enough off - street parking, these people are not our neighbors, the streets are too narrow for parking, do not want the increase in traffic, safety hazard to kids at the park and state trail. Either use this building for community education or recreation purposes or just tear it down and let someone build a house on the property - this is a residential neighborhood and it should stay that way. There are not enough parking spaces to accommodate 30 -37 cars. The streets are too narrow for on- street parking. I do not believe that the full -time neighbors should have to pay to widen the streets for people who do not live in the neighborhood. With the state trail and the park so close, why can't this building be used for some park- related or recreation - related activities. If this cannot happen, please consider demolishing the building and zoning it residential so we can maintain the neighborhood property values and `feel' or being some place whose families would like to live. We oppose any use of.this building that is not geared to serving the people who live in the area. (Johnson - 1432 Belmont Lane) 9. The increased traffic, parking and future construction /expansion of site, safety of children and trail users. Have no future exterior construction /expansion, leave natural grass areas and shrubs, no expanded or on- street parking, have major access on Manton Street, discourage the use of Barclay and Birmingham Streets, 30 cars maximum Jn the lot. What are the times and days when the church will be used, why purchase versus rent, why do they want to move from Saint Anthony to Maplewood? (Eggert - 1452 Belmont Lane) 10. No tax base is generated to the city, unpredicted use present and future. (Sauro - 2051 Hazelwood) 11. We already have too much tax exempt property that gives no jobs. (Rovie - 2013 Dieter St.) 12. The building should be put on the tax rolls. Road access is limited by residential streets. Space is not available for future development if the congregation grows beyond it's existing size. Are they paying a fair price, or is the county cutting them a special deal? (Ristow - 2019 Dieter Street) 13. This is an instant $20,000 decrease in the value of my property. Put them in your neighborhood - not mine - Selby Dale - Payne Avenue Arcade Street, Manton Street next. I am moving out of here if they move in. I proposed last time this would have been a good rest stop for the DNR trail but I see North Saint Paul jumped ahead and built one. Otherwise any business except drugs. (Rasmussen - 1996 Manton Street) Miscellaneous Comment Could be some money we could use in the city. Being a church, we would derive no taxes from them. I am on the fence as of now. I hope to hear more. (Casci - 2018 Dieter Street) W REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.5 acres (65,773 square feet) Existing land use: A vacant 7,000 square -foot former public library and parking lot. SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Houses across Skillman Avenue East: Houses across the DNR Gateway Trail South: Houses across the DNR Gateway Trail West: Robinhood Park across Manton Street PLANNING Criteria for CUP Approval Section 36 -442 of the Maplewood City Code gives nine standards for approving a conditional use permit. (Refer to the standards in the resolution on page 18.) Parking Requirements The City Code requires one parking space for every four seats in a church. The church has not submitted any proposed floor plans for the building. LEGAL For vacations, Chapter 412.851 of Minnesota State law states that "No such vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so..." kr :p:Sec15 /1460Skil.mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Existing Land Use Plan Map 3. Proposed Land Use Plan Map 4. Property Line/Zoning Map 5. Site Plan 6. 12 -5 -95 Plan Amendment Statement 7. 10 -23 -95 Conditional Use Permit Statement 8. July 6, 1995 letter from Saint Anthony 9. Land Use Plan Change Resolution 10. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 11. Street Vacation Resolution 31 Att.arhr? -?nt. 1 SU N N • AV'E. o GERVAUS � US. DEMONT AVE. BROOKS A � N BROOKS � AVE T =) SEX TANTVE,. y o �. ac o p01* r AVE. � GERVAlS � � -t � GERVAlS , 1 01 v p � Gk" DVIEW AVE. z CT. EL �' DIVE GERVAlS f CASTLE I COPE AVE. VIKING DR. CL W � V Q W N U V Std ER R E N AVE. B MONO" 0 1 b5 K ad Lake E cs off' CT. COQ E �,�, I L�mc—� AVE. � F . LARK J AVE. n ° lAR K AVE. a V o < _ CO. RD, sn 4 v LA URIE RD. s�wr,�ooeo Z Pbr� - iz o . LAURIE RD. V LELAND RD. u SAN DH U RST OC W JUNCTION AVE. � 2 e � 0 Z '� Y R Co D. Ate -- °D BURK AVE. c ° ® BURKE AVE. } CHAMBERS ST a (t } i j LA. ELDR IDGE AVE. 3 Ginn b4 CO AR SE � AvE. BEt�+ AVE. W 4 RAE CR�4 �O�L � SKILL V �P � S KILL AVE. HARRIS AVE. SHO ROSEWOOD AVE. N. RosEwoo D ca �``�'' • w RY AN AV 4,4 AVE. S. J TRH L m EL �' DIVE GERVAlS f CASTLE RAMSE7 COUNTY NURSING tSfp A! E M10 FAIR GROUNDS t 1 AVE. GOOOR J ALDRICH GOLF o►. WIT] �' >- ?+ `- �n v SUM R AVE. AR" Z SU MER V E. -- �.} 50 ,r w o > o DO ° I` R15BIE AVE < �,. CL a�F RIP LEY ? Z RIPL.FY AV Wokefold ° 54 PN U1 o ° C Lake o m KINGSTON t; m } '° �ti vi j Y V S ILA AVE W W PRICE AVE lip V) z x �,. PRICE w J ; o t; 4f 6 LOCATION MAP r/ 4 N CASTLE AVE COPE AVE. CL W � V Q W N U V > -11 B MONO" 0 1 b5 arty fw RAMSE7 COUNTY NURSING tSfp A! E M10 FAIR GROUNDS t 1 AVE. GOOOR J ALDRICH GOLF o►. WIT] �' >- ?+ `- �n v SUM R AVE. AR" Z SU MER V E. -- �.} 50 ,r w o > o DO ° I` R15BIE AVE < �,. CL a�F RIP LEY ? Z RIPL.FY AV Wokefold ° 54 PN U1 o ° C Lake o m KINGSTON t; m } '° �ti vi j Y V S ILA AVE W W PRICE AVE lip V) z x �,. PRICE w J ; o t; 4f 6 LOCATION MAP r/ 4 N Attachment 2 FA f l "rC s ^o " .ter 3 • O L F A F r ost ..._. OWAM Ll • f i u . c W O 0 O V b. O E rBC R -3(H) r O ►a F r (M 11 � � 1 • i .. M—- o n-Mo o • sc min r�trterlel M f KEY = P =PARK ` L= LIBRARY ID S= SCHOOL 0 C= CHURCH r R -1= SINGLE DWELLINGS R - 3(H) =MULTIPLE DWELLINGS LAND USE MAP (EXISTING) Q N 8 Attachment 3 I jrch this � s .o z f :�•- -- f --0 ' Frost Joe 0 i t • c W bw 0 M V 0 0 U bw 0 E r BC A- 3(N) -, 0 E F I ME�e * n a� f r :� 2 8C m!n ilerterfai s • KEY P —PARK ` L= LIBRARY S= SCHOOL C= CHURCH r ; R -1= SINGLE DWELLINGS 13-3(H)= MULTIPLE DWELLINGS LAND USE MAP (PROPOSED) Q N 9 Attachment 4 ' *P �` 5 3 1 077 • �►•� t� . .. am • (AD) 00 N 0 N E 0 (0 Q CVM (o ���-� 2060 � V qt V i c� rl 7-1) ,. a — •r�9; 2052 to r - ♦- � t - 2046 �— S • 30 ?. 40 - 75 y SKILLMAN AVENUE O 3 30 —" 6 4 • . •: fib, 3 14 • ::'+•': :_ .:. :: SITE :::;.'• �� PARK 13 ::::�..:::'.::: 5 12 :: oeo A Tre N� 2012 - 2t LA �— 2( : 2004 . zoos r_ _ 2 1997 19 _ 1 -1 ) ' — 0 1996 — - - - • 4 1984 _ z) - _ ;� �.`-- -` • 1984 0 985- C 0 30 30 r__ ' � 6O � T i� 7 ' 60 Q�� 3 zs IZ ww YAN 0 1 j30 �; 1 {19 •i =.• 2 z 2 - • (ez) $ G 1 , 27 4 ''' J 27 = ls i 1 � N ,� . • s j O . ` eC d �( 1 , Z U v ; ! _ � < Cr SC f "r• N° dZ Z _ Q Z 1 �o 2 i 60 s �� m �o ( � (s0) oggo. umm . P 0 ^ 33 h • PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 10 i Q. N 2051 i . • � ,� t1 4 N • a- S3 sL. 33 3 f - o 2,� ' �3 4, T 22 o 4 C5) A- � �; 2 dm A I r_ 1 7 r_ < - 16 b 10(s) k.-;- lg`lggoI� r_ 14 m p • - 0 ri ~ (l0� 60 _ � 1 3 ., A N PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 10 i Q. N Attachment 5 u• ' •r.. ^•-- •i.r_..��. r1Yr+1►T'P"fI•wk9r- ..r..,,.._.... 69 1 • we& vW-W Tor Oy" S' • 1 �K�MM 11� M1�1 s td x " wv�i�er Ns•w s ..r+.R - aoa W .o • t'�''" f LL N AV .'�'. :•.._.yfRlrlk.. -s _ �.,� , k . do" -�. .r�•sw n+r „ � �l / # ♦/= c'] • ' ♦ fir .y. 4 . ' • / "e one s %p PONFAM form 1 � - •� /•' I- - ~'r• .•~ fry'', '� �� T•_ )' ��f' . � - _.... w. � :. :.; • :, :: i ` r /„w•! �� - Y l '.���j��r w ,.} }'.T %r.• y .• I• �V.• ` ♦ ` ' �• :ti�� ':' • '•t:. • : �:ti::' ' t -'s � ' � , • �; 'i e ' ; yK ,..� ; e . + ) � / ` r LOT PARKING � • �'•':� � •':::: �� • '"': �! � �” rte- + I / /I f �. UILDING A P a. .10 �r �� _�r w_ S •f•.; . P. "� /jam / •- t. 00.1 Ow skip- No o. Px i= r . t e t0 } 3 SITE PLAN 11 4 N Attachment 6 Parranto &Davis ATTORNEYS AT LAW VAL PARRANTO DAVIS GARY L. DAVIS December 5,1995 1538 WHITE BEAR AVE. SUITE 204 ST. PAUL, .MN 55106 (612 ) 774 -7278 FAX (612) 774 -8942 Mr. Ken Roberts City. of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Roberts: Please be advised that the undersigned represents The lntercommunity Charitable Trust in the matter of their rchase of the property at 1460 Skillman Avenue East (formerly the p p p Maplewood Library) from the County of Ramsey for purposes of use as a Church. As you are aware my Y clients have already applied to the City of Maplewood fora Conditional Use Permit and that in accordance with the City of Maplewood's Zoning Ordinances, the use of the premises as a Church is a specifically permitted use under Maplewood's current zoning plan. It is my understandin g that since the commencement of this application process it has been determined by the City of Maplewood that the City will require my clients to apply for a Comprehensive Plan Ammendment as well. As this new application requires of my clients much the same information as was required in the first application I submit that in order to avoid duplication we refer to material, information and exhibits produced earlier as part of the C.U.P. application. If the City is in need of a Site Plan or Architects Drawings plese see Exhibit No.1 which was p roduced for the C.U.P. application, County's Design Documents, Site Plan and Architects p Drawings. As with any Church, the facility will not be in constant use, but will have its highest use during religious holidays. Even at that time, this congregation consists of only 30 -37 families and most of them would have to travel great distances to attend worship services as it now stands. My clients would maintain and eventually improve the property. It is their intention to be good neighbors and good citizens of the City of Maplewood. Their most recent prior landlord , Saint Anthony Village, is sorry to see them leave (See Exhibit 41 C.U.P. ), but since the building my clients rented is being razed there is no choice but for them to move and they see Maplewood as a fine community for their relocation. 12 We have written to all of the named property owners (See Exhibit I C.U.P.) cited in the radial search provided to us by Bettendorf Abstracting (See Exhibit 2/ C.U.P.). In conversation with those neighbors who have responded to our salutations, my clients' relocation into the neighborhood is apparently seen as a positive addition. It is my undrstanding that those who responded to the City's questionaire have in some cases been negative in their appraisal of my client's purchase and have given some racially biased or other inappropriate responses. Naturally my client will expect that the City would not condone such sentiment in its consideration of my clients applications. The use of this facility as a Church will be located, designed, maintained, and operated in conformity with the City's requirements and Code of Ordinances. It will not change the existing character of the surrounding area. In fact, such use typically results in higher property.values and in any event does not depreciate property values. (See Exhibit 5 / C.U.P. ; Information about property values to homeowners whose property is near a Church or similar facility as provided by Mike Zoff, Edina Realty). Naturally, the Church would not be involved in, or use the premises for any activity or process or use any materials, equipment, or methods of operation that might be deemed hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property due to excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference, or other nuisances. As regards vehicular traffic, the most cars ever generated at this congregation's functions is in the range of 30 -37 cars. There is a parking lot on the property which will be more than adequate to meet the needs of my client without causing any vehicular traffic congestion or any unsafe conditions on local streets. (See Exhibit 1/ C.U.P.). Since this is an existing building most recently used as a Public Library which is a "Community Use" building and somewhat similar in use to that which my clients anticipate, it is assumed that the City is currently providing adequate public facilities and services, including streets, fire and police protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. The use of the premises as I a Church as opposed to a Library would not increase the cost of said public facilities or services. In fact it likely that there will be Less use and therefore less strain on the facilities when used as a Church than there was when used as a Public Library since the Church use would not be as constant as the library, but would be used on days of worship ( i.e. weekends) and not every day. If you have any questions regarding this application or this letter, please call Val Parranto Davis of Parranto & Davis Attorneys. Yours truly, Val Parranto Davis VPD /pl/95 -066 13 Attachment 7 Parranto &Davis ATTORNEYS AT LAW VAL PARRANTO DAVIS GARY L. DAVIS October 23, 1995 Mr. Ken Roberts or Mr. Tom Eckstrand City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B .Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Messers. Roberts and Eckstrand: 1538 WHITE BEAR AVE. SUITE 204 ST. PAUL, MN 55106 (612 ) 774 -7278 FAX (612) 774 -8942 Please be advised that the undersigned represents The Intercommunity Charitable Trust of the property in the matter of their purchase p p Y at 1460 Skillman Avenue East (formerly the Libras Ma lewood g City from the Count of Ramsey for purposes of use as a Church. It is my p Y) Y understandin that the of Maplewood will require my clients to apply for a Conditional Use p Permit and that in accordance with the City of Maplewood's Zoning Ordinances, the use of the p p remises as a Church is a specifically permitted use under Maplewood 's current zoning plan. Yp It is not my client's intention to do any serious remodeling or other construction at this time. The only Y P immediate) anticipated changes to the premises current condition and design would be essentially cosmetic in nature or in the nature of maintenance or repair. $ome examples would include aintin in the interior, repair of the kitchen /bath facilities to better accommodate the p g p .. congregation's needs and provision of a dividing mechanism in the largest room in the facility since this is a very congregation small con re ation and they do not need a room of its size. (See Exhibit No. 1) As with any Church, the facility will not be in constant use, but will have its highest use durin g g Y religious holidays. Even at that time, this congregation consists of only 30 -37 families and most of them would have to travel great distances to attend worship services. M clients would maintain and eventually improve the property. It is their intention to be good neighbors and good citizens of the City of Maplewood. Their most recent prior landlord., Saint Anthony Village, is sorry to see them leave (See Exhibit 4), but since the building my clients rented is bein g razed there is no choice but for them to move and they see Maplewood as a fine community for their relocation. 14 We ha ve written to all of the named property owners (See Exhibit 3) cited in the radial p search provided to 9 o us b Bettendorf Abstracting (See Exhibit 2). in conversation with those neighbors who ha v e responded to our salutations, my clients relocation into the neighborhood is p apparently seen as a positive addition. ' ' ill be located designed, The use of this facility as a Church will maintained, and operated in g conformity with t y p h he City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances. It will not change the . 'n character of the surrounding area. In fact, such use typically existing g results in higher property values and in any event does not depreciate property values. (See Exhibit 5 ). the Church would not b Naturally, ae involved in, or use the premises for any activity or proce ss or use an y equipment, materials, a ui ment, or methods of operation that might be deemed hazardous detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property due to excessive noise glare, smoke dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference., or other nuisances. ' I 6 r traffic, the most cars ever As regards vehicu a tra generated at this congregation's functions 9 ' range of 30 -37 cars. There is a parking is in the g p g lot on the property which will be more than adequate to meet the needs of my client without causing any vehicular traffic congestion or any unsafe conditions on local streets. (See Exhibit 1). Since this is an existing building most recently used as a Public Library which is a "Community g nit Use" building and somewhat similar in use to that which my clients anticipate, it is assumed that the City is currently providing adequate public facilities and services, including Yp streets fire and olice protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and p p p arks. The use of the p remises as a Church as opposed to a Library would not increase the cost of said public facilities or services. This use will incorporate and preserve the sites natural and scenic features into its future development design if and when an new construction is anticipated. In any event, the premises p 9 y used as a Church does not now and will not in the future cause adverse environmental effects. If you have any questions regarding this application or this letter, please call Val Parranto Davis of Parranto & Davis Attorneys. Yours truly, Val Parranto Davis VPD /pl /95 -066 15 at Attachment IS ills e Administrative Offices 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony,. Minnesota 55418 -1699 (612) 789 -8881 FAX (612) 781 -9323 July 6, 1995 To Whom It May Concern: The City of St. Anthony has been renting space for the worship services of the AGA Kahn Church for many years. They are prompt with their rent, take excellent care of the space they rent and are very good tenants. If the City of St. Anthony were to build rental space in our new, City Hall we would not hesitate to rent to AGA Kahn Church. If you have any questions, please call me. Thank you, Larry Hame Public Works Director 16 Attachment 9 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ms. Val Davis (for Ismaili Muslim Community Church) applied for a change to the Citys land use .plan from L (libary) to C (church). WHEREAS, this change applies to the property at 1460 Skillman Avenue. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. The planning commission held a public hearing on January 2, 1996. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the .plan amendment. 2. The city council discussed the plan amendment on January 22, 1996. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described change for the following reasons: 1. A church would have less affect on neighborhood traffic than an office building or the formes library. 2. A church would be just as compatible as an office or library with the existing and planned land uses around this site. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on January 22, 1996. 17 Attachment 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ms. Val Davis (for the Ismaili Muslim Community Church) applied for a conditional use .permit to open a church. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1460 Skillman Avenue. The legal description is: Blocks 28 and 29, Gladstone Plat 2, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1..On January 2, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on January 22, 1996. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 18 Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans the city received on November 15, 1995. The director of community development may approve minor changes. The city council must approve a conditional use permit revision for any expansion of the church building or parking lot. 2. The building must be used for a church within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The city council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. Fill any potholes in the parking lot and driveways (code requirement). 4. Sweep and restripe the parking lot to current city code requirements. 5. Remove and clean up any junk or garbage on the property. 6. The church shall keep any outdoor trash or recycling containers in a 100 percent opaque enclosure, as required by code. The design of the enclosure shall be subject to staff approval. 7. Any outside remodeling shall be subject to the approval of the community design review board and building official. Any inside remodeling shall be subject to the approval of the building official and the fire marshal. 8. The city council shall review this permit in one year. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on January 22, 1996. 19 Attachment 11 STREET VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, community development director applied for the vacation of the following - described street: The Barclay Street right -of -way between the south right -of -way line of Skillman Avenue and the south property line of Blocks 28 and 29, Gladstone Plat 2 or the north property line of the DNR Gateway Trail in Section 15, Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On January 2, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this vacation. 2. On January 22, 1996, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: Blocks 28 and 29, Gladstone Plat 2, Ramsey County, Minnesota NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city has no plans to build a street in this location. 3. The adjacent properties have street access. 4. The county has been using this right -of -way for a parking lot. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 11996. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JANUARY 2, 1996 Call to Order Chb+rperson Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. 11. ROLL C Commissioner L ter Axdahl Commissioner Bun Brueggeman Commissioner Barbar ricson Commissioner Lorraine her Commissioner Jack Frost Commissioner Kevin Kittridge Commissioner Dave Kopesky Commissioner Gary Pearson Commissioner William Rossbach Commissioner Milo Thompson 111. APPROVAL of MINUTES Commissioner Rossbach moved Commissioner Kittridge secpl5ded. The motion passed. IV. APPROVAL OFjJ4GENDA Present Present Present Present Present Present resent sent Pres t Present proval of the minutes b#�December 4, 1995, as submitted. Ayes —al Commis ' ner Thompson moved approval of the amended agenda, adding Item � January 8 Coun 'Meeting. \ ommissioner Frost seconded. Ayes —all T passed. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Ismaili Muslim Community Church - -1460 Skillman Avenue: Land Use Plan Change (L to C), Conditional Use Permit, and Street Right -of -Way Vacation Ken Roberts, associate planner, read the public hearing notice and presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts answered questions from the commission. *Val Parranto Davis, attorney for the church, .also answered questions. She said the church had no problem with any of the conditions. A member of the church said the congregation was composed of mostly professional people, many who were originally from India, Pakistan, and East Africa.. He said their church services would primarily be on Friday evening and Sunday morning. The church has approximately 100 -125 members. Chairperson Axdahl asked for comments from the public. Wallace Ristow, 2019 Dieter Street, asked if the area was large enough for future expansion of the church. He also asked if the requirement to cl up the area would include the pillars of concrete buried on the site. The Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 01 -02 -96 church member responded that the building was more than adequate because the size of the community has remained stable. He also said they planned to maintain the property nd upgrade Y p9 the building. Dawn Anderson Johnson, 1459 Skillman, was concerned about any planned changes to the exterior and interior of the building and the amount of traffic that would be generated. The church representative responded that traffic would be minimal. He said the were uncertain about exterior changes but the inside would be remodeled to include a prayer hall and classrooms for the children. Since there were no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Kittridge moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which changes the land use .plan for the property at 1460 Skillman Avenue. This change is from L (library) to C (church). The city should approve this change because: 1. A church would have less affect on neighborhood traffic than an office building or the former library. 2. A church would be just as compatible as an office or library with the existing and planned land uses around this site. B. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a church at 1460 Skillman Avenue. The council should approve this resolution based on the findings required b 9 q Y the city code and with the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans the city received on November 15, 1995. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The city council must approve a conditional use permit revision for any expansion of the church building or parking lot. 2. The building must be used for a church within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The city council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. Fill any :potholes in the parking lot and driveways (code requirement). 4. Sweep and restripe the parking lot to current city code requirements. 5. Remove and clean up any junk or garbage on the property. 6. The church shall keep any outdoor trash or recycling containers in a 100 percent opaque enclosure, as required by code. The design of the enclosure shall be subject to staff approval. 7. The city council shall review this permit in one year. C. Adoption of the resolution which vacates the Barclay Street right -of -way between Skillman Avenue and the DNR Gateway Trail. The city should vacate this street right -of -way because: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city has no plans to build a street in this location. Planning Commission -3_ Minutes of 01 -02 -96 3. The adjacent properties have street access. 4. The county has been using this right -of -way for a parking lot. Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. OLD BUSINESS Shoreland Ordinance n Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. He said thi/ne w given to the mmission again because, after a considerable delay, the DNR h request some minor Chang Mr. Roberts then answered questions from the commission. ner Rossbach question the section that stated a lot division should not result in the ore than three lots. . Roberts explained that lot div isions can be done with ad a royal. The pp .creation of fou r more lots would require a preliminary plat application il approval. Commissioner Ros ach commented about the limitations of PUD by requiring them to have more than one use. commission and staff discussed the r rictions of the ordinance on anything but routine main Hance of vegetation in the shore) d. Commissioner Frost moved th lanning Commission commend adoption of the corrected shoreland ordinance, adding the rd "the" on page , (h), (5) before addition would and changing page 23, c., first line, re "shall not ade bluffs." Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Commissioner Axdahl asked if lot divi ' n requ is to add a home near the lake in the Arcade /Keller area would be affect by the setb requirements of the ordinance. Mr. Roberts said the biggest problem encoun red is the lack of ntage on a public street required by the subdivision code. Ayes—all The motion pass VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Adult Us6 Ordinance K Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Fische hought it 4ould be a BC usage rather than a manufacturing usage, G -� MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: DATE: Action by Council. d Endorse -. Modif i ed ..�.�,. ,. City Manager Rejected Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner ?ate Code Variance, Street Vacation, Conditional Use Permit abd Design Review AT&T Cellular Telephone Tower 1899 Clarence Street January 10, 1996 INTRODUCTION Project Description Ted Olson, of AT &T Wireless Services, is proposing to install a cellular- telephone tower facility. Mr. Olson proposes this facility behind Woodbury Mechanical's storage garage at 1899 Clarence Street. Refer to the maps on pages 1 0-13. The tower would be 150 feet tall. It would be a monopole tower with no guy wires. The applicant also would install a 12- by 28 -foot precast - concrete building to contain the electrical equipment for the tower. This would be a one -story building with a flat roof. The building would be embossed with a brick pattern. Refer to the photocopies and the written explanation on pages 17 -20. Requests Ted Olson, of AT &T Wireless Services, is requesting that the city council approve: 1. A variance from the code establishing a one -year moratorium on the installation of any telephone, television or radio towers. 2. A street vacation for the 600- foot -long section of Curve Street lying west of the property. This section of Curve Street is 30 feet wide and runs between Frost Avenue and Summer Avenue. Refer to the map on page 10 and the letter on page 16. 3. A conditional use permit (CUP)to put up a 150 - foot -tall cellular telephone tower. (AT &T recently proposed this facility on the Wanless Construction site at 1840 English Street. They chose the new location due to strong neighborhood opposition over the previous site.) 4. The building design and site plans. BACKGROUND Moratorium .December 18, 1995: The city council adopted the moratorium ordinance against the installation of any telephone, television or radio transmission /receiving towers. The moratorium would last for one year, unless the city council adopts regulations sooner that govern the installation of tower facilities. DISCUSSION Variance AT &T is requesting a variance from the antenna and tower moratorium to allow the construction of the cellular- telephone monopole. In order for the council to approve this request, they must determine that the proposal would be compatible with both the existing and proposed land use and zoning. It must also be found to be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. To make the findings for approval, the following issues should be addressed: 1. Is it compatible with the existing land use and zoning and appropriate with the BC -M (business commercial- modified) district? The proposal would be compatible with the existing and proposed land use and zoning. It would cause less impact on the nearby homeowners than the previously proposed English Street site. There are fewer residential neighbors that would be effected. At the Wanless Construction site, seven of the 27 property owners notified (26 %) opposed this proposal. At the current site, two of the 32 surrounding property owners notified (6 %0) opposed the tower. The design of the proposed building would also fit in with the surrounding commercial development. Based on the few objections received from our survey, and the nearby commercial development, the proposed location would be compatible with this neighborhood. 2. Would this request meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance? Since the proposed use would be compatible with the land use and zoning, it would also meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. Has the applicant demonstrated that the location of the proposed monopole is necessary to meet the frequency, reuse and spacing needs of the cellular system and to provide adequate coverage and capacity to areas which cannot be adequately served by locating the antenna in a less restrictive district. The applicant has demonstrated this in his letter of request and justification on pages 17 -20. 4. Will the monopole be located on a continuous parcel having a dimension equal to the height of the pole located nearest to the property line? If not, has a qualified structural engineer specified that any collapse of the pole will occur within a lesser distance under all foreseeable circumstances? The proposed monopole would be closer to the nearest lot line than the height of the pole (150 feet). The proposed monopole, however, would be further than 150 feet to the nearest residence. The applicant has stated in his letter that the proposed monopole will be engineered and manufactured by Valmont Industries, Inc. of Valley, Nebraska. They will provide the required engineering information to the building official for the building permit. 5. is the monopole and equipment building located in a near yard area and will the applicant meet all building and setback requirements? The proposed pole would be in a rear yard and it would meet all setback requirements upon the vacation of Curve Street. Without this vacation, the proposed pole would encroach onto the Curve Street right -of -way. All building codes must, and would, be met. 2 6. Does the project meet all site plan review requirements and is the buildin g screened from view with landscaping or other structures? Provided the city council vacates Curve Street, all site plan review requirements would be met. The community design review board conditionally approved this project on Janua ry 9 1996. No screening was required because the proposed building nd tower would be behind hind other buildings. Screening for the building does not seem warranted due to the the lacement of proposed building. Screening p P p g g could be required, however, if the council would find it to be beneficial. Street Vacation The city council should vacate Curve Street. The abutting neighbors have signed a petition in 9 9 favor. There are no lots that it would serve. All of the parcels east of this right-of- alread g Y y have access from Clarence Street. Mr. Jan Sundgaard, of 1865 Clarence Street has a e side yard that he might large ht ossib! build a g g possibly new home on. This, however, is subject to verification of the amount of land area he has and the location of his house. If Mr. Sund card did build, , access would come from Clarence Street, not Curve Street. The applicant needs this vacation to build their facility. Without the vacation the would not meet the required building setbacks ' y q g acks for the tower and budding. in fact, the would be partially within the right -of -way as would the two proposed parking spaces. As a condition of this vacation, the city should retain a 10- foot -wide utility easement for an existing storm sewer pipe. There is an existing storm sewer in place north of the Woodbur Mechanical ro ert . The easement p P Y ,however, is not wide enough. Ten additional feet are needed. Refer to the map on page 11. Conditional Use Permit The city, council should approve this request. This t ro'ec meets the criteria for a p j CUP. As stated above in the variance discussion, there is very little neighborhood opposition to this ro osal. Eighty-one er pp P p percent of those surveyed did not even respond. The design of the building would also be compatible with the adjacent commercial structures. es. As noted above under the street vacation discussion additional nal easement width is needed on the Woodbury Mechanical property for the existing storm sewer i e. If the council approves this P P pp his CUP, they should require this easement dedication as shown on P a g e 11. 3 Building Design and Site Issues The design and exterior of the proposed building would fit in with the nearby commercial buildings. The applicant should, however, design the building with a hip roof to be compatible with Woodbury Mechanical's roof design. Mr. Olson has agreed to do this. There are several round concrete culvert sections behind the building which Mr. Olson has agreed to clean up when building their facility. It is not possible to see if there is any other debris around the site that should be cleaned up because of the snow. The CDRB should require the removal of the culvert sections and site clean up as conditions of this approval. Mr. Olson has agreed to remove the culvert sections when they build their facility. Access. to the two proposed parking spaces for AT &T would be blocked by a semi - trailer, truck and small flat -bed trailer located on the north side of the Woodbury Mechanical building. These would have to be moved to provide clear access to the proposed parking spaces. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 21. This resolution approves a variance from the monopole installation moratorium for AT &T's proposed 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower at 1899 Clarence Street. Approval is based on the following reasons: 1. The proposed AT &T monopole and building installation would be compatible with the existing and proposed land uses and zoning. 2. 94% of the surrounding neighbors notified of this project voiced no objection to this request. 3. The use would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance because of compatibility. 4. The proposed facility is needed to improve service to AT &T's users based on their tower - spacing requirements. 5. The proposed monopole would not cause any radio or television interference. 6. The proposed monopole would be designed by a qualified structural engineer. 7. All setback and building code requirements would be met. 8. The facility has met with the approval of the Maplewood Community Design Review Board. B. Adopt the resolution on page 22. This resolution vacates the Curve Street right -of -way between Summer Avenue and Frost Avenue. It would be in the public interest to vacate Curve Street because: 1. There are no abutting lots that could benefit from its construction. 4 2.. The right -of -way width is only 30 feet wide. The minimum right -of -way width required is 60 feet. 3. The city has no intention to build Curve Street. Approval of this vacation shall be subject to the city retaining an easement for utility purposes over, under and across all that part of vacated Curve Street. adjacent to Block 6, GLADSTONE, Ramsey County, Minnesota, which lies Southerly of the Westerly extension of a line drawn parallel with and 20.00 feet Northerly of the South line of Lot 1 of said Block 6, and which lies Northerly of the Westerly extension of a line drawn parallel with and 10.00 feet Southerly of the North line of Lot 2 of said Block 6, GLADSTONE. C. Adopt the resolution on pages 23-24. This resolution approves a conditional use permit to allow a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower at 1899 Clarence Street. Approval is based on the findings required by the ordinance and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The property owner shall dedicate a utility easement for storm sewer purposes to the City of Maplewood over, under and across the North 10.00 feet of the West 65.00 of Lot 2, Block 6, GLADSTONE, Ramsey County, Minnesota. D. Approve the plans date - stamped December 21, 1995, for a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone ..tower and equipment building at 1899 Clarence Street. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in one year if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Obtain the following city council approvals: a. A variance from the moratorium ordinance. b. A conditional use permit. c. The vacation of Curve Street west of Woodbury Mechanical's property. 3. Before getting a building permit the applicant shall submit revised building elevations, for staff approval, showing a hip roof on the proposed equipment building. The color of the building shall match, or be compatible, with Woodbury Mechanical's building. 4. Before getting a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall: a. Remove and dispose of the round concrete culvert sections behind the Woodbury Mechanical building and make sure the site is cleaned up. b. Relocate or remove the semi- trailer, truck and small flat -bed trailer from the north side of the Woodbury Mechanical building to allow access to AT &T's two parking spaces. 5 c. Pave a driveway extension and two striped parking spaces for this facility (code requirement). J 5. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 6 CITIZENS' COMMENTS I surveyed owners of the 32 properties within 350 feet of the proposed tower site. Of the six replies, three were in favor, two objected and one owner had a miscellaneous comment. In Favor What's good for AT &T is good for Maplewood. (Jablonski, 1763 Maryknoll Avenue) Opposed 1. It is too close #o housing. Why not put a pole across English Street in open space area? (Dean, 1881 Ide Street) 2. It is not aesthetically pleasing. This tower would be more appropriate in an industrial -zoned area. (Sundgaard, 1865 Clarence Street) Miscellaneous Comment Hello, we are new to the neighborhood. I'm not sure what to put on the proposal, we only moved in a month ago. We live at 1896 Clarence. I was looking at the map, it looks like this antenna would be real close to us. I guess I will go with the majority vote, but I'm not real sure of the pros and cons. You can send me more information about this proposal, otherwise I guess whatever the rest of the neighborhood wants is fine with me. Thank you. (Driscoll, 1896 Clarence Street) 7 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 29,600 square feet Existing land use: Woodbury Mechanical garage SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Richard's Market South: The back yards of single dwellings West: Undeveloped Curve Street .and abandoned .railroad right-of-way future trail East. Clarence Street, single dwellings and Gladstone fire station PAST ACTION Previous AT &T Proposal December 11, 1995: AT &T withdrew their application for their tower facility on the Wanless Construction property. Other Tower Sites April 23, 1984: The city council granted a CUP for MCI to install a 280- foot -tall radio and telephone communications tower on the south side of Hi hwood Avenue. This facility is next to Carver General Auto Repair and two single dwellings. MCI 's facility also had two equipment buildings and a fenced yard for security. KSTP radio station on Highway 61 has two tower sites — one on each side of the . hi hwa 9 Y The. Proposed Site On July 17, 1990, the Community Design Review Board (CDRB) approved plans for the construction of the 1,800 - square -foot storage garage for Woodbury echanical on the subject property. rY 1 PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: BC-M (business commercial modified) Zoning: BGM Ordinance Requirement Section 36- 437(1) requires a CUP for public utility, public service or public building uses. The proposed tower is a public service use. 8 Vacation - Finding for Approval To vacate right -of -way, state law requires that the city council must find that it would be in the public interest. Conditional Use Permit - Findings for Approval Section 36- 442(a) requires that the city council base their approval of a CUP on nine standards for approval. Refer to the resolution on pages 23-24. p :sect 51at &t5.cup Attachments: 1. Location Map 2, Land Use Plan Map 30 Property Line/Zoning Map 4. Site Plan 5. Photocopy of the proposed tower 6. Photocopy of the proposed building 7. Applicant's Street Vacation Justification dated December 8, 1995 8. Applicant's Conditional Use Permit Justification and Project Explanation dated December 8, 1995 9. Variance Resolution 10. Street Vacation Resolution 11: Conditional Use Permit Resolution 12. Site plan /survey date - stamped December 21, 1995 (separate attachment) 13. Colored photocopies of tower and building (separate attachments) 0 Attachment 1 a,i ws Cr T AVE, .• Z Mood w O z 3 �. COUNTY ROAC g ® c 23 Y l `t r O CIR P L/) O N S� � kD0 OR DR ILLS DR •� Kai�Ynon PALM � Cr 1, �� z W i Z O ° to 9 • •� , •. CT. P cn N (R W S 3 CONNpR CO c C7; CON W W ; X EDGEHIL W AVE. NOR AVE. v v DEMONT . CT . DEMON O ff• AVE. m % � • - P� BROOKS AVE BROOKS TAN 04 W •t ,� o BROOKS CT ' 4, SEX ' Z AVE ° : t2 a,, AVE. " °z . ;.; • A FC GERVAIS AVE. GERVAIS s GRANDVIEW z v AVE. W • �•. poo o e VIKING DR. ' SHERREN AVE. . •..• .. COPE K c e ad Lake AVE. WING DR. Keller / J LARK � o O 4 ' � � � AVE. Q LARK AVE. � w 60 O Doke � _ CO. RD. vy ,� U LAURIE RD. s1,.r.00l p LAURIE O RD. AURIE CT. - � ` ``' i _ � o RD. LELAND c� (X Z W c o SANDH URST � I�Ork 12 z z z AVE. � G. z @ � �. AVE. uj JUNCTION z B Y CO. RD. B JRKE AV "KE CT. -00 o Pa�c' (1) CHAMBERS 6V CE ° A. St o (1) cc BURKE AVE. ca AVE. o ® BU A RKE A I ELDRIDGE ,4 AV ° Mp ELDR IDGE AVE• X LA. W BELMONT ( COU RSE iii AVE. I BEL#AONT E. AVE. TyO� MAN AV, KENW 000 KEL R GO SKILL AV _ �c,Q` SKILL MAN AVE. HARRIS AVE. w �. SH t; Cr ROSEWOOD AVE. h 6O J ° RY AN AV. ROSEW00 D AVE. S. J A VE L �`► o Q�� t o r O� Cr 0 �7 MOST N AVE. 0 D AVE 0 0 ° 0 0 0 � � 62 W 3 J a NTON FE AVE. W �:;:� • • � ; U MER AV E. y. S ° U W SU MI�AER AVE. 28 111 z ° _j W 3 l3 GOR DON FRISSIE . z O Y Y 0 a 3 RIP LEY 00 00 z o z ° Y W W G Wakefield ° Q-' SO PH IA o ° so take m 27 Round Y v SOP HIA AVE Z Z Lake w PRICE P 64 3 Phole , ° �- Z 0 0 . 61 Q 65 � C lb lb SENT PAU LOCATION MAP 10 4 N Attachment 2 9qM) E It L ' ll ` , J� Frost w j r� RI art Artai AVO. IMP •r . \ J�� 1` • '•� . t- " r. , w/y� /. ' } .��.r.. LAC_ • � , � Rte � � .L . �, ` � � --T -- --• - , � 1 .,i •• � , Vii ,��. � - - OS pu P j , _ s r r do mss i o MW '4nsior'bolitctnr ma jor arteri stint Paul 4; 30 C Q O IL O _ m • r GLADSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLA 4 N e N � O 9qM) E It L ' ll ` , J� Frost w j r� RI art Artai AVO. IMP •r . \ J�� 1` • '•� . t- " r. , w/y� /. ' } .��.r.. LAC_ • � , � Rte � � .L . �, ` � � --T -- --• - , � 1 .,i •• � , Vii ,��. � - - OS pu P j , _ s r r do mss i o MW '4nsior'bolitctnr ma jor arteri stint Paul 4; 30 C Q O IL O _ m • r GLADSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLA 4 N Attachment 3 W W F- N S V1 J Z .J W e MOBILE... nm HOMES _._._ o do v GLADSTONE'S WINDOW 'AN D D _ . OOR STORE 0 �9 y C bo l � 9 � 22tS94Q 0 1 in p z - u 6 A 1 1i ■ �s ! _ vs ��.Zs i zZ9. ► /MILLER'S MEATS ■ <��' ►I ►ham SC Hoo L i � T A 0 + 17s., .. GL CATERI b I , NG R 0 S T- RICHARD'S MAR } • R 30 ► 1 MIKE'S LP DENTAL LAB — ` '290 3 0 to 2 _ r► - --- GLADSTONE FIRE STATION= -- 4 ,WOODBURY MECHANICAL PROPERTY s ROPOSED ANTENNA SITE) IF, 1 889. 9 A . 22 r ` 7� to 1 SUMM R 1 CURVE STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY. PROPOSED TO BE VACATED p�' 3 zb 4 ('1 2 7 $ 40 4 ri' tT ;nft IT ' 41Le 4 1T as = 7 �-Z-4 WANLESS CONSTRUCTION tiAdo) 9 * Z Z (PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED ANTENNA SITE t PROPERTY LINE 120NING MAP tz 4 N FROST AVENUE — — — — — — — — - - - - - ----- - - - - - © % E E.J1F r % 30, w �Y OMMM OF THE NOMMUtY UWE OF K= G % NG WM1NOtS--% LLJ rri co c Li � ��4 of f RICHARD'S M p J.H. V TRIC UN Lr k RICHARD'S UTILITY & ORAINAGE ES TO BE RETAJNED VACATION PROCE. SEWER LOCATION EM ti t k J k PROPOSED SHELTER" NoRtN Log or K= 6 4RKET LLJ U) SPOIL PILE --%% % L LLJ %110 > Cr Q) 30�00 8V,57'57- S. 89°57'57" E` I Alt 1 I E cc VD ! z Attachment 4 UTILITY EASEMENT REQUIRED WOODBURY MECHANICALI 20.3r -- o(o FENCE- PROPOSED E 'TRAI-,% 4J L�AS 'T' G / -- - - < PROPOSED MONOPOLE f J."s I M NoRtN Log or K= 6 4RKET LLJ U) SPOIL PILE --%% % L LLJ %110 > Cr Q) 30�00 8V,57'57- S. 89°57'57" E` I Alt 1 I E cc VD ! z Attachment 4 UTILITY EASEMENT REQUIRED WOODBURY MECHANICALI . FENCE- G / -- - - _SVt_Vr4_E W ATEMIR y "Z;1 Lu C 6.G. TELEPHONE UK w I A W Ile SITE PLAN 13 4 2 Preport —WESTERLY EXTENSK)N OF SOUTH UNE OF BLOCK 6 AT&T V o 2515 ' MINNEoh SOUTH LINE OF BLOCK 6 2 2 5 0'N AC ..pb F4.4 MOW 4wee Tiac�r- H pr lit- Mi �fcP t S f CCC e 4 • ;+t �. ]q' t" +r�wa✓.uyjM'WMMIM��i/y, .. C i { fi t 11 F f• • t. .• ppff11 �'{f�{f :c { .. . '.... - - � -1i. ..1,. ,;... .F �. ,. "a',.. �• x,95 fSd -. ... � $Yi.?�U� �' � pr %i tr N f 1 Y i. Hr - I4 Tom. ^?l ,�'•. + 4' 1f:... S �r k4� •� ., � �� � �, f�'i�� � � ;:fir ��� f� t � it y,, K •. 7.. .. � �j {, Not a ` � ��' C+ a C+ :\ !i lit- %i tr N f 1 Y i. Hr - I4 Tom. ^?l ,�'•. + 4' 1f:... S �r k4� •� ., � �� � �, f�'i�� � � ;:fir ��� f� t � it y,, K •. 7.. .. � �j {, Not a ` � ��' C+ a C+ :\ !i Attachment 7 sm AT&T Cellular Division December 8, 1995 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Planning Commission City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN. 55109 RE: Curve Street Right of Way Vacation Honorable Mayor, Council Members and Commissioners: AT &T Wireless Services 2515 24th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55406 612 721 -1660 FAX 612 721 -4770 This letter accompanies an application for a Public Vacation of Curve Street between Frost 6 and Summer Avenues. The request is being made in the name of AT &T Wireless Services. The fee owners of the Pe y ro rt have consented to this application and have entered into a P lease for a portion of their property. The reason for the request is to allow construction of a small building proposed to be constructed to the west of an existing structure at .1899 Clearance Street By vacating this rig of way, it will allow the applicant to meet set back requirements. rements. There is no public need for this street as it has not been constructed and it's 30 foot easement width is too narrow to allow for 2 -way traffic. This street was to have been a one -way street and opposing traffic would have been carried by Ridge Street on the o PP osite side of the Northern Pacific Railway Co. easement. The Ridge Street right of way was vacated per Document # 1801806 filed 6- 25 -71. All lots abutting this right of way in this area currently have access to Clearance Street. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Ted Olson Property Manager TO/ enclosures 16 ^,� Recycled Paper Attachment g AT&T Cellular Division :December 8, 1995 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Planning Commission City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN. 55109 RE: Con&tional Use Permit Application Cellular Telephone Antenna Site 1899 Clarence Street Honorable Mayor, Council Members, and Commissioners: AT &T Wireless Services 2515 24th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55406 612 721 -1660 FAX 612 721 -4770 This letter accompanies an application for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a cellular telephone antenna site on land owned by Tim and Jeff Eldridge. The property is currently being used by the Eldridges in conducting his business under the name of Woodbury Mechanical, Inc. The request is being made in the name of AT &T Wireless Services ("AT&T"'). The fee owners have consented to this application and have entered into a lease agreement with the applicant for a portion of their property. Site drawings of the property and a picture of a similar site accompany this letter. As you are aware, AT &T recently withdrew an application for a Conditional Use Permit for this use at 1840 English Street. The decision to withdraw that application was made after the City Council meeting of November 27, 1995, where a number of area residents and council members expressed the opinion that this use would fit beater in the area surrounding the intersection of Frost and English Streets. Since that meeting, AT &T representatives have worked extensively to find an alternate location for the proposed cellular antenna site. We have explored and analyzed every available possibility. While this proposed new site will not allow AT &T to provide the quality of service that we had hoped to achieve in this area, it does satisfy the concerns of the Councilmembers and those residents. The Proposed Use. The site would be used by AT &T Wireless Services, one of only two companies who have been licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to provide cellular communications services to the Twin Cities. The proposed project would include a steel monopole with antennas attached to it and the construction of an equipment building to accommodate cellular radio and switching equipment A site is needed in this area for the following reason: • The need for improved cellular coverage as dictated by our customers 17 i�3 Recycled Paper Cellular Telephone Antenna Site 1899 Clarence Street Page 2 The Monopole. The proposed monopole will provide the support for the cellular antennas. It is constructed of steel, is completely self - supporting, and will be painted to blend with the sky. It will be engineered and manufactured by Valmont Industries, Inc. of Valley, Nebraska. We will provide detailed engineering data for permitting purposes to your Building Inspections Department when this request is granted. Equipment Building. The proposed equipment building will house radio, computer, and climate control_ equipment for this site. The equipment is powered by 220 volt, single phase, AC electric. It will be connected to AT &T Wireless Services' central switching offices via traditional telephone lines. As a result, no one will need to be present at the site on a daily basis. There will only be an occasional visit (average of once a month) for rou tine maintenance. The equipment produces no noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odor. The building itself is approximately 12' wide, 28' long, and 10' high. It is manufactured of pre- cast concrete with a brick facade to meet your codes. It will be brought to the proposed site by truck, off- loaded, and set on permanent concrete footings. Antennas. The antennas will be attached to the monopole and will transmit and receive the FM radio signals that c voice ce and data between the cellular system users and AT &T Wireless Services' central switch. The physical size of the antennas depends on the type and manufacturer. The area in which cellular coverage is needed largely defines the required antenna height. Naturally, topography and surrounding trees and buildings also play an important role in arriving at the appropriate height. AT &T wireless Services' engineers have determined that the height necessary at this location is 150 feet. The Cellular Phone System. Users of cellular telephone service include members of the business community as well as the public sector. Commuters, doctors, salespeople, business owners and executives all benefit by using cellular phones. Additionally, cellular telephones are used extensively by fire, police, and other public safety officials and departments. The system allows police and others to conduct discreet communication in the field, and it enables direct communication with individuals in need of assistance even when a traditional telephone is unavailable. Cellular phone users can contact "911 it to report accidents, fines, or other emergencies without first having to search for a telephone. The Question of Interference. The cellular phone system operates on a specific set of channels set aside by the Federal Communications Commission. The filtering of spurious signals is very tightly controlled. Cellular Cellular Telephone Antenna Site 1899 Clarence Street Page 3 telephones operate within a strictly regulated set of allotted frequencies between. 825 and 845 megahertz (MHz) and between 870 and 890 MHz. AT &T Wireless Services is currently licensed to operate in over 100 major markets nationwide with hundreds of antennas. There has not been any instance of television or radio interference reported. All AT &T Wireless Services sites must be operated in accordance with our FCC license to provide cellular service in this area. Mr. Albert S. Jarratt, Jr., Engineer in Charge of the St. Paul Field Office, Field Operations Bureau of the FCC, confirmed that the FCC has not received any complaints of interference by cellular phone transmissions with home electronic entertainment equipment in any of the five states in which Mr. Jarratt's office has jurisdiction. The Conditional Use Permit. The City of Maplewood, in it's Conditional Use Permit Application and zoning ordinances set forth the following standards by which the City Council shall approve, amend, or deny a conditional use permit: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and Code of ordinances. One of the purposes and intents of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan is to provide essential services to the public, including communication services. For the reasons set forth in greater detail above, a cell site in this general location is necessary to provide adequate cellular telephone service to this area of the City and surrounding areas. Allowing the cell site to be located here, subject to reasonable conditions, is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Zoning ordinance and. Comprehensive Plan. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. The City's zoning map designates the site for Business Commercial uses and is currently being used as a construction company's offices and storage yard. The site is. bordered to the north by other commercial uses, to the west by a large open parcel that could someday develop into a mixed use Planned Unit Development containing business and commercial uses, to the east by a vacated railroad bed owned by Ramsey County, and to the south by a mix of single family and high- density residential. The proposed communications facility is designed to serve those types of uses, as well as .the general public. Providing improved cellular telephone capacity and coverage for these uses will have a positive impact on the present and future character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. AT &T Wireless Services has installed over 100 cell sites throughout the state. In no instance has there ever been any evidence that a cell site has caused any depreciation of surrounding property values. .4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. As set forth in greater detail previously in this letter, the proposed use will not be detrimental in any way to the health, safety or general welfare of the community. To the contrary, providing improved cellular telephone coverage and capacity will be beneficial to the community. 19 Cellular Telephone Antenna Site 1.899 Clarence Street Page.4 S. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. Because of the computerized operation of this technology, site visits will be infrequent. On average, less than once a month. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. The only public utilities or services . that the proposed use requires is electrical service, which is ample for AT&T Wireless Services needs at this site. 7. the use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. See #6 above. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. N/A 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. The use would have no adverse environmental effects of any kind. 10. The City Council may waive any of the above requirements for a public building or utility structure, provided the Council sha, ll f f rst nu&e a determination that the balancing of public interest between governmental units of the state would be best served by such waiver. Under section 22.914 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the FCC requires AT &T Wireless Services to provide reliable cellular service to all who request it in this area. The increasing number of cellular users in this area makes this quite difficult without the proposed site. Many cities, because of this Federal mandate, have deemed our building and monopole an "essential service structure," and therefore waiving the need for a conditional use permit altogether. The granting of the CUP will alleviate problems for AT &T Wireless Services and it's customers in this area, including city and county departments of public safety. Conclusion. This letter should serve to better explain our application and to answer some of your questions. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact meat 612 -844 -6742. I will be in attendance at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings to address any additional questions that you may have. AT&T Wireless Services appreciates the assistance that we have already received from the City's Staff, and we look forward to working with you to better serve the area. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerel , Ted Olson Property Manager 20 Attachment 9 VARIANCE. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, AT &T Wireless Services applied for a variance from the moratorium ordinance. WHEREAS, this variance applies to 1899 Clarence Street. The legal description is: Lots 2-6, Lot 22 and the south 25 feet of Lot 23 in Block 6, Gladstone. WHEREAS, the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a moratorium against the installation of any communications. towers for one year, unless the council adopts new regulations sooner. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to install a cellular telephone tower contrary to the provisions of the ordinance. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1.0n January 16, 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council this variance. 2. The city council held a public hearing on 1996. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described variance for the following reasons: 1. The proposed AT &T monopole and building installation would be compatible with the existing and proposed land uses and zoning. 2. 94% of the surrounding neighbors notified of this project voiced no objection to this request. 3. The use would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance because of compatibility. 4. The proposed facility is needed to improve service to AT &T's users based on their tower- spacing requirements. 5. The proposed monopole would not cause any radio or television interference. 6. The proposed monopole would be designed by a qualified structural engineer. 7. All setback and building code requirements would be met. 80 The facility has met with the approval of the Maplewood Community Design Review Board. Adopted by the Maplewood City Council on 1996. 21 Attachment 10 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, AT &T Wireless Services applied for the vacation of the following described street: The Curve Street right -of -way lying west of Block 6, Gladstone. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On , 1996, the planning commission recommended that the city council this vacation. 2. On , 1996, the .city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: Lots 1 -12 and Lot 29 Block 6, Gladstone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described vacation. It would be in the public interest because: 1. There are no abutting lots that could benefit from its construction. 2. The right -of -way width is only 30 feet wide. The minimum right -of -way width required is 60 feet. 3. The city has no intention to build Curve Street. Approval of this vacation shall be subject to the city retaining an easement for utility purposes over, under and across all that part of vacated Curve Street adjacent to Block 6, G ADSTONE, Ramsey County, Minnesota, which Lies Southerly of the Westerly extension of a line drawn parallel with and 20.00 feet Northerly of the South line of Lot 1 of said Block 6, and which lies Northerly of the Westerly extension of a line drawn parallel with and 10.00 feet Southerly of the North line of Lot 2 of said Block 6, GLADSTONE. Adopted by the Maplewood City Council on 1 1996. 22 Attachment 11 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, AT &T Wireless Services applied for a conditional use permit to install a 150 - foot -tall cellular telephone tower. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1899 Clarence Street. The legal description is: Lots 2--6, Lot 22 and the south 25 feet of Lot 23 in Block 6, Gladstone. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1 On 199 , the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on , 199. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in . conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 23 Approval is subject to the. following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval PP or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The property owner shall dedicate a utility easement for storm sewer u oses to the City of P rP Y Maplewood over, under and. across the North 10.00 feet of the West 65.00 of Lot 2, Block 6, GLADSTONE, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Adopted by the Maplewood City Council on 1 1996. 24 5p ' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR AGENDA ITEM 0.2. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1996 B. AT &T Tower -1899 Clarence Street: Tower Moratorium Variance, Street Vacation , and Curve Street), ) Conditional Use Permit Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. In response to a question from the commission about neighborhood opposition, Melinda Coleman, director of community development, responded: that there doesn't seem to be the same level of concern for this pro. posal as the previous one on English Street. She received one phone call, and noted that some council members had received calls in favor of the tower at this location. Peter Beck, attorney for AT &T, and Ted Olson, property manager for AT &T, were present at the meeting. Mr. Beck said the proposed site is lower that the location originally proposed and will be less effective, but the tower would be the same height (150 feet). He then showed pictures of the area on which the pole was drawn at scale and colored. Mr. Beck also said the applicant was agreeable to all conditions recommended by staff. Mr. Olson also answered questions from the. commission. David Bartol, 1249 Frisbie Avenue, said he spoke with Jan Sundgaard (the owner of a neighboring mobile home park and house). He said that Mr. Sundgaard was opposed to the tower. Mr. Bartol thanked the commission for the tower moratorium. He asked them to consider whether the felt they . Y Y would approve this proposal after a year of study. .11f the commission is unsure, he recommended they table the application. Commissioner Pearson moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which, approves a variance from the monopole installation moratorium for AT &T's proposed 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower at 1899 Clarence Street. Approval is based on the following reasons: 1. The proposed AT &T monopole and building installation would be compatible with the existing .and proposed land uses and zoning. 2. Ninety -four percent of the surrounding neighbors notified of this project voiced no objection to this request. 3. The use would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance because of compatibility. 4. The proposed facility is needed to improve service to AT &T's users based on their tower - spacing requirements. 5. The proposed monopole would not cause any radio or television interference. 6. The proposed monopole would be designed by a qualified structural engineer. 7. All setback and building code requirements would be met. 8. The facility has met with the approval of the Maplewood Community Design Review Board. .a, Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 01 -16 -96 4 B. Adoption of the resolution which vacates the Curve Street right -of -way between Summer Avenue and Frost Avenue. It would be in the public interest to vacate Curve Street because: 1. There are no abutting lots that could benefit from its construction. 2. The right -of -way width is only 30 feet wide. The minimum right -of -way width required is 60 feet. 3. The city has no intention to build . Curve Street. Approval of this vacation shall be subject to the city retaining an easement for utility purposes over, under and across all that part of vacated Curve Street adjacent to Block 6, GLADSTONE, Ramsey County, Minnesota, which lies Southerly of the Westerly. extension of a line drawn parallel with and 20.00 feet Northerly of the South line of Lot 1 of said Block 6, and which lies Northerly of the Westerly extension of a line drawn parallel with and 10.00 feet Southerly of the North Line of -Lot 2 of said Block 6, GLADSTONE. C. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit to allow a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower at 1899 Clarence Street. Approval is based on the findings required by the ordinance and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The -city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The property owner shall dedicate a utility easement for storm sewer purposes to the City of Maplewood over, under and across the North 10.00 feet of the West 65.00 of Lot 2 Block 6, GLADSTONE, Ramsey County, Minnesota. D. Approval of the plans date- stamped December 21, 1995, for a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower and equipment building at 1899 Clarence Street. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in one year if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Obtain the following city council approvals: a. A variance from the moratorium ordinance. b. A conditional use permit. c. The vacation of Curve Street west of Woodbury Mechanical's property. 3. Before getting a building permit the applicant shall submit revised building elevations, for staff approval, showing a hip roof on the proposed equipment building. The color of the building shall match, or be compatible, with Woodbury Mechanical's building. 4. Before getting a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall: Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 01 -16 -96 a. Remove and dispose of the round concrete culvert sections behind the Woodbury ry Mechanical building and make sure the site is cleaned up. b. Relocate or remove the semi- trailer, truck and small flat -bed trailer from the north side of the Woodbury Mechanical building'to allow access to AT &T's two parking spaces. c. Pave a driveway extension and two striped .parking spaces for this facility (code requirement). 5. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Commissioner Frost seconded. Commissioner Fischer commented that, since there was no ordinance at this time for guidance, placing a pole in a business commercial or manufacturing zone is better than putting it in a residential or open space area. Ayes —all The motion passed. x dN� / MEMORANDUM TO Mike McGuire, City Manager FROM: Melinda Coleman, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Holiday Store DATE: January 16, 1996 INTRODUCTION Act ionk by Council Endors e d....., Modifi ed,.„. ]4 e j ected„ ,„ date At the December 4, 1995, city council meeting, a public hearing was held for the proposed Holiday Store at the southeast corner of McKnight and Lower Afton Roads. At this meetin g the city council requested additional information on the following subjects: 1. Sanitary sewer backup at 328 McKnight Road South. 2. Traffic concerns at the intersection of Lower Afton Road and McKnight Road. 3. Driveway locations and need for cross easements. 4. Nature of police calls at this location. 5. Recommendation from watershed district on need for sedimentation pond. 6. Design and environmental concerns with car wash. 7. Site design elements, including use of Amur maples for landscaping, sight triangle obstructions, and restrictions on outside storage. Items 1 -3 - These have been addressed in a memorandum from Ken Haider o page 2. The requirement for cross easements on the driveways has been .added to the conditional use permit resolution on page 35 in the December 4, 1995, staff report. Item 4 -The police call log for 1994 and 1995 for this intersection has been provided. This indicates that there were a total of 61 police calls with a wide range of violations and assistance. (See pages 8 -10.) Items 5 and 6 - Additional information has been provided by Mark Nelson of Holiday Companies. See the attached letter and information starting on page 11. The watershed district has indicated to staff that they do not require a pond for this project. A letter from them is included on page 21. Item 7 - The site plan will be amended to remove Amur maples from the landscaping plan. Restrictions on outside storage of merchandise has been added to the conditional use permit resolution on page 35 in the December 4, 1995, staff report. RECOMMENDATION See the recommendations in the December 4, 1995, staff report. p:sec12 -28 \holiday.mc Attachments: 1. Memo from Ken.Haider dated December 29, 1995 2. Maplewood Police log dated December 28, 1995 3. Letter from Mask Nelson of Hoiiday Stationstores dated January 12, 1996 4. J Letter from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed Board dated January 16, 1996. 5. Staff report of December 4, 1995 Attachment 1 MEMORANDUM TO Melinda Coleman, Director of Community Development T FROM: Ken Haider, City Engineer SUBJECT: Holiday Store Proposal DATE: December 29, 1995 The. city council requested additional information on two specific subjects at a recent council meeting concerning this proposal. The first concern is the sanitary sewer backup at 328 McKnight Road South that occurred within the last year. I have attached the sewer backup report dated January 31, 1995, concerning his incident. According g to our records the city was notified at 9 a.m. that a backup had occurred. The main line sewer was cleared by 9:20 a.m. and things were back to normal. The home at 328 McKnight Road South, however, did sustain damage and it is described in more detail in the attached handwritten note from the sewer division concerning the incident. The cause of the backup was tree roots in the 12 inch main line sewer. It is not uncommon for stoppages of this nature to be caused by tree roots removed from some upstream location becoming lodged in the city sewer anywhere down the line. The public works department annually publishes an article in the Maplewood in Motion concerning the sanitary sewer. The last article is attached for reference. The article indicates the proper notification procedure to report a backup and also reminds the homeowners that if they do have their sewer service line cleaned that the notify the Y Y public works department so that we can check the downstream pipes to make sure they are not plugged. The second issue concerns traffic at the intersection of Lower Afton Road and McKnight Road. I talked to Dan Soler of Ramsey County. . He reiterated the same opinions he expressed in the original staff report, that being the intersection does not have any significant traffic problems at this time. Both McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road have adequate capacity to handle the traffic. The most recent traffic counts available are those from 1993. They are as follows: Lower Afton Road east of McKnight Road 5 ADT McKnight Road south of Lower Afton Road 8 ADT McKnight Road north of Lower Afton Road 10 ADT The four -way stop is functioning well at the present time. Mr. Soler believes it will continue to operate well after construction of the proposed Holiday Store. 3 Holiday Store 2 December 29, 1995 There is also a concern about the location of the two driveways closest to the intersection. The Lower Afton Road driveway is setback 85 feet from McKnight Road. Ingress for this driveway is not a problem since it is downstream of the intersection. Therefore, the driveway should have no effect on Lower Afton Road traffic. The McKnight Road driveway is 125 feet back from the intersection. This is adequate to store at least five vehicles in each lane, for a total of 10 on McKnight Road, without blocking the driveway. If more vehicles are stacked waiting or the four-way stop g Y p ingress for south bound traffic on McKnight Road may be interrupted. However, under those conditions. an intelligent driver would continue south on McKnight Road to the next driveway and use that into the Holiday Store. Again, in should not be a problem from this driveway because the four -way stop sign at the intersection does create breaks in the traffic and should allow reasonable access to.the p ublic street. KGH jc. Attachments .y DATE: F:;t P� 1= t< U F=> FR F.= F=> C3 F=;t"r ID b ADDRESS OF BACKUP: �''�� Gr a .,� . ��,�� BACKUP kEPORTED TO - - - - -- ft"m — mom BY:: T -1A PERSONNEL DISPATCHED TO S IT E : ?, ae T I ME: I ME: STOPAGE CORRECTED: _V %i-,,. � T I ME: CAUSE OF STOPAGE: ON— On dw� � "mm ON=. mmmm -now amm 4� dm� 6� ON O omm 4� 4--m dew. Aftm dom NNW -nip am. amm eaw qm� am. *am �m sm� __m__ amm EQUiPM USED: ----- __,.._- -- - - - -- -H : / . 4� mum 40� -mom *mom �"w ftw"� "m ft� *am —HOURS: DESCRIBE DAMAGE: d • `_���_.S� ,� -..� �' ��'. • . -' '' �v �.�� y ,fir -100- 4"m 4"m "Wo OEM omm _ - - - - - am= _ -- 40M Ono --40- Amw _ Ono "M..mm mm -ow ONO ft� am. LIST ANY STATEMENTS By CREW /PROP. O NER REGARDING DAMAGE OR POSSIBLE CLAIMS -W-mmft� 6�.wmw C) E: 0T' FZ' E; K F.= 0r C; ADDRESS OF STOPAGE, DOWNSTREAM UPSTREAM M,oH,oNOo, 0 < < < < < M-H-NO. D I STANCE D MA 13 1 E; "r F:;Z I CT NO.. �� 5 ow Oi'' tic i'S...r • ._-� �r � . f .� ~S r /, t gop • f' d� r � _.,2 'ir- . - -" ` .�'� I _ '�* �- �.., .w . ;' •7 ,,,i • - „ + ., r y ,,- i' °• ;!Y = :''',,. � L 7 = t/ �' �.t i X j's • f ' �, r» I • , r �'i►'�^ tii�`'ir+� •!' r• � �'��''' � `" `�ir:l�"/`i..�.�^i/f- �' `��-✓' E.�,..� Ole il. ' R�_. �, �..- :�,.>{.:s� ��. j - I iA _ j�wi .�- ,ri...•� ' �• r•' �'�.+ .•s - - �• . �i ` "' ► r "� l�rtTT,',.� f t / • Y � /�' t+j• �!'' � � ,.+ �. y i ' •�., � .-"` •- �''� ..._'' � _. "1C • • _ - � V � - j _ fl► - �.! - , � F . ,,,�' � a�,.�'v+�' � { .� � �`�' /�' ..�- r - . r _ �. �.' +. '..r'rr�;,! �.. �..r >�,,.✓ � ..�„/e. ..�,,; -•� •�/� -�. i :...`„{y�•••I 7►:.�. • iaC•�'y�..� �-'�/ i Zr r Lo t?- t'• /`i_sy' y j (^'' C. �w - .ice;.•�,� �" / t -�� ri..1i —� ��►-'` .+ F C� '�„v�• ~ �r `�:- .G�J^'� i r. � .. �x .I �. -�:.r /� :. 1�C' ! r�� � �' - •�ssr .. - '� :,,.� .��'t✓��...,. �r,.'�`�'`v�l...yy�.,��w• �„L__,/� r� �.�� Y � � � // � � y�.- b+aa'p.. .;' ... ••�{!• �.�f� -� .. , � ..,,�',,.1'r,e„ ,�. ..��,�„ ,,,�(r -. •• � �.. �i. � ��'••..�- • y ' r_�1..�...3� - s�c. - 1 '�..✓ .% 4 ksr �. •(,.�' �� '�' (+'�,. �.ri.r.._• �.� ' - ��' :..,.• -I!' ,�._ .�.�."��. -r, �v �w.ar' ,�p�- ' "�i"_�. °�"' � G�'�:� i. v' r .f•• ?' �• _�_'�,r.,. ✓' .._��`• �•. i.��r' O'•"I /�`� "��. �f•.� y.:.�'� ` ! '�.'� •'c•..ia'�`. �s•'1vr �. ,r nI' ` �.. d {...+•r - fi r e.� t. �,...• �/"'�,r, - '1i/ - - +r"�► 41 15' ..•�► ' i. - ... - . 4, ._�.i� ���.. ► •'�i' �'�• ••ii•r/� r"'�"'q+. i �� I ? y��.1."� ..._. y' p ;. ' "1�/ �,,,. t,�'^G'M"•1! �' �"'�- i - . r, + /�`+1!" 001„ ri..• ti� "f !� �,,: '' / `�•r' 4 `.� - -.. �.:-. +.-•�. * r -•Sf /,,.•,•..t 0 L? 1S t Public Works Ibur S'e►vcr System - A Guided Tour Your sanitary sewer is very much like your « Beater - you don' thiilk about It much unt11 it doesn' work. Sewers are something that are taken for granted - out of sight, out of mind - until the out of sight part stops working. A basic understanding of the plulliblllg and sallitan• sewer systems in your house will help you to know what to do if waste water does not drain front your house. The sanitary sewer system begins with the drains inside your house. Al.l of the drailis from the sulks, toilets, etc., piped to the sanitary sewer service that exits your house underground and connects to the sanitary set% main under the street. Each drain has a "trap" that prevents sewer gasses and odors front cllt i the house. Each drain also has a roof vent pipe that exhausts gasses through a chimney- like stack and admits fresh air to the drains. Vents maintain the pressure behind the flow of drain water and wastes, thus preventing water from being siphoned out of the traps. The sewer service line is typically a four -inch diameter cast -iron pipe (plastic in homes built after 1980), and is usually installed under the basement floor. A clean -out opening is installed just before the pipe leaves the house. In case of a blockage in the sewer service line, plumbers use this clean out to eliminate blockages between the house and the sewer plain. After the sewer scn•ice line leaves the house, it typically connects to a six - inch diameter clay pipe which then connects to the eight -inch diameter clay pipe sewer main. The t� length of the sewer service line front the llousc to the ccrltcrliiie of the street (or the sewer plain) is 60 feet. The first 30 feet of the scNN line is typically cast droll and the remaining 30 foot run to the sewer main is clay pipe. Drain pipes and vent pipes, collcctiN•ely called the drain - waste- N or DWV system, must work together to drain water and waste. If a Went pipe is plugged, the drain will burp and bubble as water drains out. If only one section of plumbing does not drain, it is usually an Internal plumbing probicin. lioweN if no drains work, or the entire system drains slowly. or the worst case scenario occurs - waste water conics back through the basement floor drain - the problem is outside of the house in either the sc«•cr sen7icc line or the sewer main. If you suspect a hlockage outside of your house, contact our Public Works department at 770 -4550 (or call Map1ewood Police at 777 -8191 after normal business hours). Our utility department will check the sewer main through a manhole to determine if there is a blockage in the sewer main line. If there is no problem in the street, the blockage is probably between the House and the sewer main. Tree -root invasion at the joints of the old style clay pipe is a conlnion probleni. mature trees exist. If there is a blockage in the sc«•er scnyice line, it is the hoincown responsibility. Our utility department requests that they be notified after a scNN service line has been cleaned. T�•pically, the cle- aili ng process pushes an accumulation of trce.roots and seNvagc into the sewer m that m ay cause a blockage of the main, and cons (111clltly cause sewe backups in your neighbors' homes. Most of tilt City's seNv I11f11 its we installed in the late '50's and early '60's. Much of the system is eight -inch clay pipe that connects to the la rge Metropolitan Waste Control interceptors that ultimately convey sewage to the Pigs Eye Treatment Plant ill St. Paul. Otir nill depa rtment Cleans and maintains 138 miles of s sewer and 12 pump stations. 7 RUN DA � 28-0EC-95 RUN -TIME: 162-47 REPORT 0/ 5 summary totals only DT-TM RPTD: N/0/94 0 0O0 - 12 7/95 0 000 Attachment 2 MAPLEW8OD POLICE PAG 1 ***ENFOkS*** �C�����ATlSTlCS SUMMARY dc----� int�r�tl � (Summary by Juris & C'S Activity) SORT SEQUENCE: (9 1 ) AGENCY �lS & �� � CF:'.-! IVl7Y SUMMARY TOTAL REPORT DETAIL ��l�S: 8 lime heading use preset pagebmaks single spaced - f I E L D N A IME RANGE SELECTIONS GROUP SELEI., , "AN" DATE-TM REPORTED 01/O1B 4 00/00 - 12/27/9500:00 STREET NAME GROUP *lower afton* *mckni INTERSE�'STR�ET GROUP *)owe aftow» *mckni�t* � RUN DATE: *2O- DES: -95 M A P L E W O O D E` O L I C E RUN TI P. i. - -47 RUN '! = F. R S rt t'� i i� , d" T f f f P T s • '� e= � r REPORT #_ ` s��mm.2—r�= to only CFS _ ALI S RECEi _ � � � G STAT��i�_� �����E RP TD: =F F� a s G DT–TM F�TD= 01 r 11 9 �0 *0 -- 1 � L� 1 9�_ � 000 (Summary by J is & �•EE Af - i f i yy j SORT SEQUENCE: (9 AGENCY, JUG` I O & CFS ACTIVITY PAG i ' UMMARY TOTAL AGENCY 001 JUR I E 01 ACTIVITY 09001 TOTAL DEEE : SPEEDING A GEN Y V00 JURTS "I ACTIVITY V IT � if 9`0:� TOTAL DF": DISOBEY ETON` SIGN i. AGENCY 001 jUR I L 01 ACTIVITY 09003 TOTAL DEED :: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAS' # AG 00 1 JUR I E _� 1 AI` T I V I TY 0. s 05- � TOTAL DESC : E XHAU.J . HOT MUFFLED 1 A E�, - r 10 . BUR I E 0.1 ACTIVITY 09028 TOTAL DESC: DEFECTIVE LIGHT VIOLATION ADEN ,' :6Ar I JUR I E 01 AC: T I v I T Y 0 J0 *3 TOTAL DE-SC: ALL OTHER M V I NG V I OLAT I OHS 1 AGENCY 1 J UR I E 0 1 ACT 1.1 T �_ ��`� :�� 1 TOTAL DESC : FAIL TO DISPLAY CURRENT REGI rz) Al =H:,Y (X.)1 T J��R -S f 01 ACTIVITY .. • i �:�L11 ' i TOTAL : : _ E DSC s T f f s F•. ' i• { DRIVING WITHOUT I j AGENCY 001 JUR I b 0 s ACTIVITY 0 2.14 TOTAL DER-C a. ALL OTHER' ILL V I �ILAT 10��S 1 AGENCY 00 J�. =�.I 0 ACTIVITY � #�r:`;.� TOTAI DE:��_ i i NO �EOOF OF I��L=c`A�I�.E � �_ NCxf # }' -E. _ _ F z `.€ 1 � 1 ti . i ;ITS = : :.� 9 � #`�'''" TOTA L DE�� :' DES C; D�.I1,IH�� � i f: # _ TEE WITHDRAWAL A D =1 JUG' I{ 1 Ai: T I` I T!r `L 1 ` TOTALfE =: sEH IEEE cTOLEH OJT I I?E A s i:i•r'!:i ii f F jf. =�• � TfE r Lfi=FIv:_s =9 R Til'T . T i :i: ��� -r AL TU DE !� L =i•: = IH 1 PEA. .. EH A `OE= ETA HIGH AGEN£_V 001 TU " �'= A�'TIEfIT� �����R� TOTAL DE•_�_: PRO D�� � �lLH A�.�.�E�.��: ST/HIGH _ AGENCY X01 JUR I E 01 ACTIVITY 09444 TOTAL DEEC : DEED' STRUCK t AGENCY 0 JUR I E � 1 ACTI VITY 0 TOTAL DEOC : SI CARED FOR ALL HED RUNS 1 AGENCY 00 JUR I E .01 ACTI 092,0 TOTAL DESC : PUBLIC AEC I ET AGENC � t� 1 JUG' I t 0 1 ACT I V I T t 09 310 TOTAL DESC : OTHER � � I T I ? EH � •OMFLA I N 'i i A GrE NIC `I 1 JUE` I E €� 1 ACTIVITY 02 -18 1 TOTAL DEOO: EUO�` I � : I OUL VEHICLES 1 �� AGENCY 1 JUr-. I E 01 ACTIVITY V I T �F 096 TOTAL DESK.: PARKING COMFLA � HT,� i AGENCY 00 JL R I E 0 1 ACTIVITY 0` 90 TOTAL DEE%: SERVE WARRANTS r C 0 IGEN 001 s CUIE JU 01 A f �' i I� ITS Fi =i ? 1 991AE•, TOT D r S € _ iirit = JVE AGENCY 00 JUR t E 01 ACTI 0 99 13 TOTAL DECC : UNLICENSED TENSED VENDORS 1 D RUN DATE: 28-DEC-95 1. M A P L E W 0 0 D P 0 L I C E PAGE 3 RUN- TIME: 16:47 E N F 0 R REPORT #: 5 summar totals onl CFS CALLS RECEIVED STATISTICS SUMMAR 21 f B P i n t ,0 r 01 5- t. I ,r.,T-TM RPTD: 01/01/94 0000 - 121'227/95 0000 (Summary T by Wris & CFS Activit SOP SEQUENCE: (9 1) AGENCY, JURIS A C'S ACTIVITY SUMMARY S' TOTAL AGENCY 00.1 JURIS 01 ACTIVITY 09919 TOTAL DEED: TRAFFIC (EXCEPT DWI) AGENCY 001 JURIS 01 H U C V L 11 L ACTIVITY 09'.32' 2 . TOTAL DESC.! VEH UNLOCKS AGENCY 001 JURIS 01 ACTIVITY d850.0. TOTAL DESIC: DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MAR I T UAN A -POSSEPSTON H 0 D .j i OO L4 A EN V*-% IV J U R 1 S' 0 IL a. IT I V A�. I ITY 0:070 TOTAL DESC: D'ITURB PEAfCE 1.01 -MS-PUB'I C NUISANCE AGENCY 0.01 JURIS 01 AC TIVi l T y I I T '-' TOTAL DES C: THEFT-LESS 2.z00-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP A 6 N Y 6. 1 JURIS' 01 ACTIVITY vb011 TOTAL DESC: No Table Entr for this Activit A AGENCY `601 jU"* I S 01 K. i PF*T' tIT HL. I i , I T Y X A A 1 T OTA I IHL D E SC R M A @111 S T •A D M J U S U L :'LU "T-MS-:0�- ',' cE NAM POL A GCE N ;.-:* Y 00 1 J Ur, T r' 01 TOTAI HL AGENCY 00.1 T AL R 91 E P 0 R T TOTAL 61 10 Attachment 3 H011dGY Companies GEN. OFFICE: 456' WEST 80th STREET / MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1224 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 / PH. 612 - 830 -8700 / FAX 612- 830 -8864 CREDIT OFFICE: 5501 W. OLD SHAKOPEE RD. / .MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1216 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 / PH. 612 - 921 -5200 / FAX 612- 921 -5295 January 12, 1996 Melinda Coleman City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 F i(I JO 12 �s VIA MESSENGER RE: Additional Information for January 22, 1996 City Council Meeting Holiday Stations #ores, Inc. McKnight and Lower Afton Roads, Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Ms. Coleman: As requested at the December 11, 1995 City Council meeting, delivered with this letter are the following items: Customer Count: We estimate a daily average of 800 -950 customers will use our proposed convenience store /superette by the second full year of operation. Car Wash: Enclosed is information explaining where the waste water exits the car wash syste Storm Water Pond: As we have discussed, the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District does not require a pond for our site. Enclosed for your use is a copy of the subwatershed boundaries surrounding our site. Shared Access: We are willing to structure our easements with Mr. Johnson in a manner. that gives the City the ability to adjust the location of the shared driveways if the future need arises with development of Mr. Johnson's remaining property. We wish to construct the driveways in their proposed locations when our property is developed. FooD U ns, HOI -� 00 11 Ms. Coleman January 12, 1996 Page 2 We hope this additional information assists your preparation for the Council's meeting. Please call me at 830 -8767 if you have any questions, or if you wish to discuss our application. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Sincerely, .HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES, INC. Mark W. Nelson Manager Real Estate /mwn33 cc: Arnold E. Johnson Gerald E. Frisch Gary Gandrud David D. Hoeschen 12 i r ORARcLm. ;I Fi Gc F RE a % SINGL O SINGLE DOUBLE Wo" SH P R �- wiG Roc:�� Ttr. o�: �.' ��ss SPOT PASS r�ot:T r� �s,-� �, '��C � "•.:' �� t �t� PREZZ WATER v-) C }�AGc SOr,K P E ft- c . ��' I�L. EL.AST C RY -- ...w...w....r ........r ..rte _ _ t � I • • v i • hA ~Cy II UIC= =H PrR'SSUK� . Ni 2 020.5 will 2 17 it got A ro A 4 MI\I 10 ��C 5.o • 51 J 7 r Me (GA .Lo�IS} Ni 2 020.5 will 2 17 it got A ro A 4 MI\I 10 ��C 5.o • 51 J 7 r It df - �--- • 111 11 l , Fit IF r� Ul T w Not Professionally DraHm. FOR INFORMATION ONLY Car Wash Water Discharge Explanation Car Wash Svs tem Water is passed through trench drain on bay floor to collect sand and soils, then through waste trap and in`ta sanitary sewer. The biodegradable, environmentally safe chemicals are diluted by the wash water. Wash cycle water and rinse cycle water drained to sanitary sewer. Trench drain in bay floor is maintained several times per week to insure sedimentation of sand and soils. Waste trap is maintained on a periodic basis. 16 TEL: Jan 15 '96 1 No . 0 6 P. / 1 D 1A\CcE " MATERIAL SAFETY D AT •'rH9 ,14u A ,. A SHEET o� rroRs Since 1932 Thic M806 complies with 29 orn 19 -t o. i zoo SECTION I - IDENTIFICATION Manufacturer: GRACE -LEE PRODUCTS, INC. Product Name: 947 COLD WAX 2540 Second Street N.E. Date Prepared: 11 SEPT 95 Minneapolis, MN 65416 Replaces: NEW Information: 612 -379 -2711 Product 10: FP 022 •V: r: !•�• :�•�•'. • • •�'C�:;:��,v,� : :-0i}�•i:l��. I. + � 'v ♦ ' V.• •I. rr.• �Vr ., • • � • • � • • \.:'. •., J.• ti' ',V : I • •,•, • SECTION /I • HAZARDOUS !INGREDIENTS /IDENTITY INFORMA TION HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS CAS # OSHA PEL in A CGI14 TL V (PPT (OPTIONAL Contains no hazardous components ` SECTION /11 HEAL TH HAZA RD DA TA • PRIMARY ROUTES OF ENTRY: Inhalation: Yes Skin: Yes Ingestion: Yes Eyes: Yes HEAL TH HAZARDS (A C 0 TE and CHRONIC) Eye or skin contact can produce irritation. Ingestion can cause Indigestion. Excessive Inhalation of mist or vapors can cause Irritation of respiratory tract. CARCINOGENICITY: NTP: No IARC MONOGRAPHS: No OSHA REGULATED: No SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF EXPOSURE. Redness or irritation to eyes and skin. Possible dizziness If inhaled excessive MEDICAL CONDI TIONS GENERA LL Y AGGRA VA TED BY EXPOSURE: /None kno wn. EMERGENCY FIRST AID PROCEDURES ,., ... .v v. . /. . tittt�:e ws� ...:.:::::: 4 .p , r 'A: :i: . . r -r ..... .... ::: : S: •• S .v: viw. W . v" 1N �.a .� n o Ott � d��:� :r. • :ti :ti•: •'I. • 1 M 1/� •,� •.� �•; .tiff, :�:� ,, i •• tai P �� •� • a X. :. ................... : :....:.......... . a .t �v • :'• 11 l r .I •• .t�: r .. e• � o or' �at�s• ve, , :.:....... a• icy tt .fir '.:e• • •J t • • • • . • • it . • I,•4' •:•:••: • • 'r • • • • • •I ': • • '• I ' • .. • • • J ' 1 :•i A .Y•,/•Y :PI: tI % :.. � • • . • • • • I• • • r• . I • • • h'I:•:•:•� •: • ::•::•i : :•:•: �•... . ::•:•: :•�• :•fi•�•• 1 :' / {•�) T -d'Me-2 •` Y L I "d ay. .I .': :ct ��': , �`• +� tt: >J Ira �o..;.....,.. ..... SECTION I V FIRE AND EXPL OSION HAZARD DA TA FLASH POINT (Method Used): >200 EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use media sultable for surrounding area. SPECIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES: Routlne firefighting procedures adequate UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: No unusual fire and explosion hazard 17 TEL: Jan 15'96 16:13 No .003 P TIO V R CTIV DAT STABILITY. Stable CONDITIONS TO AVOID." None iNCOMPA TIBILI TY (Materials to avoid): Strong oxidizing agents HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: None HAZARDOUS POL YMERIZA T /ON: Will not occur CONDITIONS TO A VOID. None SECTION VI PHYSICAL CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS BOILING POINT: 2127 SPECIFIC GRA VI TY. 0.920 typical ypical VAPOR PRESSURE (mm Hg).& WIE MELTING POINT. NIA VAPOR DENSITY (AIr = 1): NIE EVAPORATION RA TE (Butyl acetate = l) 0.95 SOLUBILITY IN WA TER. Complete 1 %ply = 7.0-8. 0 typical ' APPEARANCEAND ODOR: Clear, yellow liquid; slight petroleum odor SECTION V11 PRECAUT IONS FOR SA FE HANDLINGAND USE STEPS TO BETAKEN IF MA TERIAL IS SPILLED OR RELEASED. Contain spill. Mop, scoop, or vacuum tip as much as possible for reuse or disposal. Flush remainder to sewer with plenty of water. Use caution as area will be slippery, WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD In accordance with local, state and federal regulations. PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORAGE Store In cool, dry place. Keep product covered. OTHER PRECA UTIONS. KEEP OUT OF REA CH OF CHILDREN. SECTION V111 CONTROL MEASURES VENTILA TION LOCAL EXHAUST., Usually adequate SPECIAL: NIA MECHANICAL (General): Satlsractory O THER. NIA PROTECTIVE GLOVES; Rubber or plastic EYE PROTECTION. Safety glasses recommended OTHER PROTECTIVE CLOTHING OR EQUIPMENT.# Routine protective clothing and equipment adequate. WORKIHYGIENE PRACTICES: Normal safe housekeeping practices adequate. HMI SINFPA TYPE RATINGS Hee/th /Blue: 1 0 = Minimal 4 = Severe Flammability /Red.• O 1= Slight Reactiv/ty/Ye /low: 0 2 = Moderate SpectficAVhite: 3 = Serlous Tha in�ormetion presented in th• MSOS is believed to be accurate. However, nothing contained in this information is to be taken as a warranty of any kind by GRACE -LEE PRODUCTS, INC. The user should review any recommendations in the specific context of the intended use to determine whether they are :ppropriste. -J W • ' - 7. TEL: Jan 15 '96 1 U_ U_6 1,,4 o U U 02 U h AA Cc Er. L E Er. i. ?THE INNOVATORS OP MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET 0 POW Since 1932 This MSDS complies with 29 CFR 1910.12 ........... SECTION I - IDENTIFICATION Manufacturer: GRACE-LEE PRODUCTS, INC. • 21540 Second Street N.F. Product Name: SUPER SUDS 6033-13 Date Prepared: 08 FEB 94 -Minneapolis,, MN 55418 Replaces: NEW Inform ation: 612.379,2711 PE LIL. XP ` . �� ��INJ� '0►R1�±�4�3►D.1Y�t�1�t�Y���� � ;. :.. ..,.:.::::: :: :.:.:':;::;;::.;;:, \:.:...:;.:..:.:..... SECTION ff - HAZ4RDOUS INGREDIENTS11DENTrry iwomfvi TIoN HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS CAS # 0 SHA PEL fpp m) A CGIH TL V (PPM) % tOPTIONALJ NO hazardous components SECTION I// HEAL TH HAZARD DA TA ROUTES OF ENTRY: Inhalation: Yes Skin: Yes In Yes - Eyes: Yes HEAL TH HAZ4 RDS (A CUTE and CHRONIC Eye or Skin contact can Produce irritation Or burnin o tissue. Ingestfon can cause dama o as 0 i f *f g tra intestina tract Excessive inhalation of mist or vapors can cause Irritation of respirator tract N TP: No 1ARC MONOGRAPHS: No CARCINOGENICITY, OSHA REGULATED: No SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF EXPOSURE: See health hazards MEDICAL CONDITIONS GENERALL Y A GGRA VA TED 8 EXPOSURE.- None kno wn. ......... ���'5:���'��;���.o ��I'r�? << /fll� #�y�<�'�S�b!,�t�!1'�1�•:Iaf � l�P:� l? ���7 !l�l?�`5;.�3I^��.�tB�'�::�dt`•. �:. ,.- .,•.•.. 04 kid iwnd 1 SKIN mAriat0* dl..'d6 Sri •,• 1 GO" ' A"' Met'.*a ' .Ndf �r y �i�:eti2f•"ws� • . ,e► . , � •, � !• .. . �\ \i\ � , ��A �r► � ,�, - �•• :. y �% . .} ,.,� !:. : r,.. .} . ....,.....• �:.:•:: ; •:•:; "•�. } }v.ti : ^: 1N1fAL-'A77-0Nt SECTION IV FIRE AND EXPLOSION IIAZ4RD DA T FL POINT (Method Used /: Non EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use media suitable for surrounding area. SPECIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES: Routine Arefightin procedures ade UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: No unusual Are and explosion hazard 19 TEL: Jan 15 '96 10:07 No .000 P . 0 STABILITY.- S :able CONDITIONS rO A VOID: None I UCOMPA TIBIL/T Y f Ma t erials to a void /: Strong acids, s trop oxidizing Ong agents HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: None HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION. Will not occur CONDITIONS TO AVOID: /Ilona SECTION W PHYSICAL CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS BO/LlNG POINT: >212 VAPOR PRESSURE (mm Hgl: NIE VAPOR DENSITY (Air = 11: WE SOL UB /LITY IN WA TER: Complete ft SPECIFIC GRA Vl T Y: 1.08 typical MELTING 1 /G POINT: N/A EVAPORAT ION RA TE (Butyl acetate = 11 N/E 1 %pH = 1.5 typical APPEARANCE AND ODOR. Clear, blue liquid SEC77ON VI1 PREC4 UTIONS FOR SAFE HANDLING AND USE STEPS TO BE TAKEN IF MATERIAL IS SPILLED OR RELEASED: Contain spill. Mop, scoop, or vacuum uP as much as possible for reuse or disposal. Flush remainder to sewer with plenty of water. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD In accordance with local, sta and federal rsgu /a tions. PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORAGE Store in cool, dry place. Keep product covered. O THER PRECA UTIONS.. KEEP 0 UT OF REA CH OF CHILDREN. SECT/ON V //! CONTROL MEASURES VENTILA TION Local Exhaust: Usually adequate SPECIAZ: NIA MECHANICAL (General /: Satisfactory OTHER: N/A \ PRO TECTI VE GL 0 VES, Rubber or plastic EYE PROTECTION: Safety glasses recommended OTHER PROTECTIVE CL O THING OR EO UIPMENT. Routine protective clothing and eq ad u 9 adequate. WORKIHYGIENE PRA CTICES. Normal safe housekeeping practices adequate. eat ue: 0 0 _ Minimal 4 e viers Flammability /Red: 0 1 Slight Rea c tivil y/Yello. w: 0 2 = Modera to Specific/White: 3 = Serious e in'forme n presentedin the WDS1 d to be eccurate. However, nothing contained in this inlormation is to be token as a werien ry of any kind by GRAC��tEE PR40ClCTS, INC. The user shaidd review eny recommendations in the spocilic context of the intended use to detelrmine whether they are appropriate. 20 Attachment 4 Ramsey- Washington Metro District 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 (612) 777 - 3665 fax (612)777 -6307 Tom Ekstrand Maplewood Community Development 1830 County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 - R J 7JAN M I Dear Tom, The District has reviewed preliminary plans for a Holiday Station Store for the corner of McKnight and Lower Afton Roads. The proposers of this g . p p s project approached the District .specifically in . regards to the issue of on -site ponding. The District does not have a policy that would require on- site ponding for this project. A sedimentation pond on this site would have limited success in treating the runoff from the site. The overall size of the parcel constrains the available space for ondin . An undersized p p g pond i would result n little dead storage and would result in a pond that would need to be cleaned out fairly often to maintain its sediment removal efficiency. Y A major concern related to this site is that the pollutants in the runoff from gas stations (gas and oil ) are lighter than water which means they will float on the surface of a pond and will not settle out of the water. The way some engineers deal with this problems is they install skimmers or subsurface drains to the pond. This allows the water to leave the and but keeps the as an ' p � p g d oil in the pond. The problem with this type of pond is that it requires frequent removal of the as and oil from the surface of the pond. g p Also, when large storm events occur, the gas and oil is simply flushed downstream resulting in a high concentration of pollutants in the runoff. The concentrated pollutant load would then have a greater impact on downstream natural areas. Please contact me at 777 -3665 if you have any questions regardin g this matter. Sincerely, /atrick onrad District Technician 21 January 16, 1996 Attachment 5 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Holiday Store LOCATION: SE Comer — McKnight and Lower Afton Roads DATE: December 4, 1995 INTRODUCTION Project Description Mark Nelson, of Holiday Companies, is proposing to build a4,000-square-foot, one -story Holiday store with fuel sales and a car wash. Refer to the maps on pages 12 and 17. There would be two pump islands with one dispenser on each island. Two vehicles could fuel up at each island at a time. Refer to the project description on page 18. (Since last September, the applicant. revised the building design. Refer to the schematic drawing on page 39. Request Mr. Nelson is requesting the following: 1. A comprehensive plan change from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). 2. A rezoning from CO to BC. Referto the statement on page 19. 3. A code change. to allow two pump islands instead of only one. Refer to page 21. 4. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a motor fuel station in a BC district. Refer to page 20. Reasons for the Requests 1 Plan change and rezoning: The code does not allow a fuel station on CO -zoned land. The applicant needs BC zoning. 2. Code change: The code does not allow more than one pump island. The applicant is proposing two. 3. CUP: The code allows fuel stations on land zoned BC only by conditional use permit. BACKGROUND Holiday Store September 19, 1994: The planning commission tabled this review until the developer presents a property value study, submits a community design review board application and provides information on the drive - through car wash noise. March 14, 1995: The community design review board approved the site, landscaping and architectural plans. September 11, 1995: The city council tabled the public hearing for this request until December 11, 1995. Adjacent Site — Proposed Parkview Townhouses July 10, 1995: The city council denied a proposal for 116 townhouses on a 20 -acre site to the southeast. Refer to page 15. This property is presently adjoined with the Holiday store site as one tract of land. Refer to the Past Actions on page 9 for additional background information. DISCUSSION Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Change The current land use plan designation and zoning is CO (commercial office). The CO zone allows offices and related commercial uses. The proposed zoning is BC (business commercial). The BC zone includes a wide variety of commercial uses, ranging from offices to fast -food restaurants and gas stations. As an alternative, the BC-M (business commercial modified) zone would allow minor fuel stations, but does not allow car washes. Since the BC zone allows such a variety of uses, the city should put a time limit on any zoning or land use change. If the Holiday Station is not built, the city could rezone the property back to CO. There are no specific findings for changing the land use plan. There are, however, certain general development policies for commercial properties. Refer to page 28. This proposal meets these criteria. The four requirements for rezoning are on page 10. This proposal meets all but part of the fourth requirement. This requirement states that "the proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer, police and fire protection and schools." This proposal would create more police calls than an office use. See the crime section below. Code Change The code defines minor fuel station as "a retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle fuels which provides no more than one island with a maximum of two dispensers." The applicant is proposing two small islands with each having one fuel dispenser. The intent of the ordinance is to Limit the number of vehicles that can fuel up at one time to four. Having two islands,. each with one dispenser, would meet the intent of the ordinance. Dispensers that can serve more than two cars at one time are possible, but not probable. According to the Minnesota Service Stat "ion Association, such dispensers make up only 2% of the market. The ordinance should require that the dispensers be designed to fuel only two cars at one time (one car on each side). Eliminating the one island requirement would not change the ordinance's intent, but would allow more flexibility in site design. The ordinance also changes the definition of major fuel station, since it is defined as a station having two or more islands. Conditional Use Permit and Site Design The proposed gas station would meet the requirements for a CUP. This use would generate more traffic than an office, but, according to Bob Hamilton, a traffic engineer with the City of St. Paul and Dan Solar, the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer, the station would not cause any major problems or safety issues. There is one change required in the site plan. The city code prohibits parking spaces within the line of vision between self- service fuel dispensers and the attendant's window. The CUP approval should state this as a requirement. 2 Open Space One neighbor suggested that the city use this site as an extension of Battle Creek Regional Park. Larry Holmberg, a supervisor with the Ramsey County Park Department, told me that the county has no plans to buy this property. The entire 25 acres owned by Mr. Johnson was on the city's open space acquisition list. Mr. Johnson had previously told the city that he did not want to sell his land to Maplewood for open space. He wanted to sell it for development. Traffic Some neighbors stated concerns about too much traffic at McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. McKnight Road is four lanes and Lower Afton Road is two lanes with a paved shoulder. There is a four -way stop at the intersection. The city has designated both these roads as major arterials. Major arterials are designed for carrying high volumes of traffic to and from residential neighborhoods. Bob Hamilton, of the City of St. Paul, said that the proposed Holiday station would increase traffic, but would not cause any major problems or safety issues. He thought that the use was appropriate for the corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. He said that McKnight Road was well equipped to handle the traffic. He suggested that the city require a traffic study to determine levels of service and the need for signals. Mr. Hamilton thought that the setback of the drives from the corner was acceptable. Dan Solar, the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer, told me that the intersection does not have any significant traffic problems. Both McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road have adequate capacity to handle the traffic from the Holiday station. The four -way stop sign is functioning well. As the south end of Maplewood continues to develop, it is likely that the county will signalize this intersection. Mr. Solar thought this might happen in about five years. He stated that the driveway locations were acceptable for the Holiday station. He did not feel that a traffic study was needed. One of the neighbors stated that MTC busses had to be rerouted because of the traffic. The MTC said they have done some route changes in that area, but the changes had nothing to do with the traffic. Other Stations One of the neighbors wrote that "Within a two mile radius of our house, we have gas station /convenience stores. We do not need another gas station." One of the people objecting to the Holiday Station is an owner of the Shamrock Plaza. There is a SuperAmerica Station there. The station has two dispensers on one island and a 24 -hour convenience store. The city attorney advised me that the city cannot deny a change to the comprehensive plan or zoning map because of the number of similar uses in the area. The courts have stated that cities cannot make market judgments. Cities must base their decisions on land use criteria. The market will determine how many and which gas stations the neighborhood will support. 3 Crime One of the residents complained that the Holiday Station would create high volumes of transient traffic and provide a hangout for youth gangs much like the SuperAmerica station across the street at Shamrock Plaza. According to the St. Paul Police Department, in the last 12 months, there were 38 police calls to Shamrock Plaza. Our research a year ago showed that there were 158 calls to the SuperAmerica Station between January, 1992 and September, 1994. Most of the calls were some type of disorderly conduct, theft or traffic violations. The Holiday station may have fewer calls because of the hours of operation. The SuperAmerica station is open 24 hours. The city code would limit the Holiday station hours of operation to 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. Ken Collins, the Maplewood Director of Public Safety, told me that there should not be a problem of gangs hanging out. Most convenience store operators call the police if this happens. He said than convenience stores are usually monitored by the police to avoid such problems. Mr. Collins stated that a convenience store would probably generate more police calls than an office, but the police calls would not affect the neighborhood. Most such calls are for theft, traffic violations or people driving off without paying for gas. Such calls do not generally affect surrounding homes. Drainage The District 1 Council in St. Paul and an owner of the Shamrock Plaza were concerned about drainage. I talked to Roger Puchreiter at the St. Paul engineering department. He was not aware of any flooding or drainage problems. There is a storm sewer along the east side of McKnight Road. The city does not allow surface drainage to the street. The developer will have to drain the surface water into catch basins and pipe the. water to the storm sewer. This should improve the existing drainage. The water from the Holiday station site now drains onto McKnight Road. Property Value Impact and Car Wash Noise Potential Last September, the planning commission noted these two issues as specific concerns that they required the applicant to address. The applicant submitted the studies addressing these concerns. Property Values I have enclosed the findings from the applicant's property value impact analysis on pages 22 -24. This study was prepared by Ruppert & Ruppert Associates, Inc., real estate appraisers. In summary, the study finds that there would not be any negative impact on the value of the five homes to the south. Staff agrees with these findings listed on page 24. In response to our survey of the neighbors, the property owner at 338 McKnight Road felt that the Holiday station would decrease his property values. Richard Simmer, a commercial appraiser for Ramsey County, said that a convenience center with gas would generally have a negative effect on surrounding residential property values. In this case, however, the negative effect is mitigated by the existing LBC (limited business commercial) zoning to the north, the Shamrock Plaza across McKnight Road and by McKnight Road itself. The nearest house would also be separated from the proposed Holiday station by about 250 feet of wooded land. (The nearest neighbor, at 228 McKnight Road, did not express any concern about the potential for a negative impact on property values.) 4 Car Wash Noise 1. have enclosed the applicant's car wash noise analysis on pages 25-27. This report concludes in saying that the car wash must be equipped with a noise reduction .package to .stay below the maximum noise limits set by the PCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency). It has been staff s observation that the noise is also reduced when the car wash doors are closed while the car wash is in operation. The applicant should be required to have the car wash doors set up to always be closed when the car wash is running. Options 1. Change the land use plan and zoning map to BC-M (business commercial modified). This would allow the gas station, but not the car wash. 2. Approve the developer's requests. 3. Deny the developer's requests. Conclusion The decision in this case is whether a convenience store with gas sales and a car wash is better for the city and the neighborhood than offices. The advantage of the proposed use is improved service for area residents. The disadvantage over offices is more traffic and more police calls, but, as stated earlier, these possibilities are not significant. I do not see strong reasons for denying or approving these requests. The revised building design on page 38 is also more attractive than the design submitted to. the CDRB last March. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 33. This resolution changes the land use plan designation for the southeast comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). This change is based on the following reasons: 1. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's policies for commercial development. 2. There would still be a transition zone between this site and the five single dwellings to the south. 3. There is similar commercial development across McKnight Road in St. Paul as the proposed Holiday store. If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall reconsider this land use plan change. B. Adopt the resolution on page 34. This resolution changes the zoning on the southeast comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). This change is based on the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with* the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 5 .2. The .proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the .best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer, police and fire protection and schools. If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall reconsider this rezoning. C. Approve the code change on page 38. This change allows two fuel- dispenser islands for minor fuel stations rather than one island. The number of fuel dispensers allowed shall not change. D. Adopt the resolution on pages 35 -37. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for a fuel station and car wash on property zoned BC (business commercial) at the southeast comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. This permit is based on the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the city stamped July 31, 1995. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The developer shall revise the site plan, for staff approval, omitting any parking spaces between the attendant's window and the fuel islands (code requirement). The applicant must still provide enough parking spaces to meet the code. 5. The developer shall submit a lighting plan for staff approval. Any lighting poles south of the buildings and fuel island canopy shall aim away from the residential district to the south. All lighting shall be screened or directed to comply with city code. Site lights shall not exceed one -foot candle of intensity at a residential lot line (code requirement). 6. The developer shall equip the car wash with a noise reduction package and keep the southerly door closed while car washing and drying equipment is operating. 7. The fuel station and car wash shall not be open between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. (code .requirement). 8. External speakers shall not exceed the noise standards set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (code requirement). C*l 9. The developer shall not disturb the land or remove any trees between the grading limits of this site and 328 McKnight Road. 10. The building official shall not issue a building permit for the proposed .development until the city approves a lot division creating this. site and the applicant records the new deed with Ramsey County. Conditions of this lot split shall include the following: a. Dedication of three feet of additional right -of -way for the future widening of McKnight Road. b. Dedication of cross easements between the Holiday site and adjacent properties because of the shared- access drives proposed. 11. The Holiday Stationstore shall not be allowed to store merchandise for sale outside of the building. 7 CITIZENS' COMMENTS We surveyed owners of the eight properties within 350 feet of this property. Of the six replies, three were in favor and three objected. In Favor 1. I believe it will lead to further development in the surrounding area. (Midway National Bank, Apple Valley) 2. It is a much needed development for south Maplewood. Refer to the further comments in the letter on page 29. (Johnson, 2299 Londin Lane) 3. Refer to the letter on page 30. (Ger,th, 2276 Londin Lane) Opposed 1. a. McKnight and Lower Afton cannot handle anymore traffic than it already has. It is dangerous enough trying to pull out of our driveway now. MTC busses had to be rerouted because of the tragic. b. Within a two mile radius of our house, we have gas station /convenience stores. We do not need another gas station. c. Development of this property will only decrease the value of my property. Sell this property to the state as an addition to Battle Creek Park. (Palmer, 338 McKnight Road) 2. It increases high volumes of transient traffic and provides a hangout for youth gangs much like the SA station does today. Use this land for a store front plaza or once building for less overall traffic (transient) than agas /quick -stop grocery store does. (Ketch, 328 McKnight Road) 3: Refer to the letter on page 31. (Anderson, Shamrock Plaza, St. Paul) 4. Refer to the letter on page 32. (District 1 Community Council) 8 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.25 acres Existing land use: undeveloped SURROUNDING LAND USES North Lower Afton Road and Battle Creek Park South: undeveloped commercial property and single: dwellings West: McKnight Road and Shamrock Shopping Center in St. Paul East: undeveloped commercial property PAST ACTION July 1, 1971: The city council granted a special use permit over the entire 25 -acre site. The permit was for a 375 -unit apartment and town house development. This permit expired in 1972. October 10, 1983: The city council rezoned the southeast comer of Lower Afton and McKnight Roads from F (farm residence) to CO. The council also changed the land use plan from RM (medium density residential) to LSC (limited service commercial) for this property. (LSC was the previous classification before the city began using zoning classifications last year.) The LSC designation allowed minor motor fuel stations. December 12, 1988: The council approved a CUP for a planned unit development (PUD). The PUD was for the entire 25 acres owned by Mr. Johnson. The PUD included 152 rental town houses, a 33,600- square -foot retail center and two gas dispensers on one island. June 1, 1991: The CUP expired. January 11, 1993: The city adopted a new comprehensive plan. As part of this plan, the city changed the land use categories to match the zoning districts. As a result, the land use for the Holiday site changed from LSC to CO. PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: CO Zoning: CO Ordinance Requirements Section 36- 151(b)(9) requires a CUP for a minor motor fuel station and car wash in a BC district. Zone Change - Findings for Approval Section 36 -485 of the zoning code requires that the city council make the following findings to rezone property: 1 The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the neighboring g 9 property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the -property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer, police and fire protection and schools. CUP — Findings for Approval Section 36- 442(x) requires that the city council approve CUPs based on specific standards for approval. Refer to the resolution on pages 35 -37. OTHER AGENCIES Ramsey Soil and Water Conversation District Robert Johnson, of the soil conservation district, stated that care must be taken to rotect nearby Y wetland and the abutting streets from sedimentation. Care must also be taken to protect groundwater from underground tanks. 10 p:secl2- 281holiday6. mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Land Use Plan Map - Existing 3. Land Use Plan Map - Proposed 4. Property Line /Zoning Map - Existing 5. Property Line /Zoning Map - Proposed 6. Site Plan 7. Description of the Proposed Development 8. Rezoning Statement 9. Conditional Use Permit Statement 10. Code Amendment Letter 11. Property Value Impact Analysis 12. Car Wash Noise Analysis 13. Commercial and Industrial Development Policies 14. Letter from Arnold Johnson dated July 18, 1994 15. Letter from Gerhard Gerth dated July 19., 1994 16. Letter from Allen J. Anderson dated July 18, 1994 17. Letter from District 1 Community Council 18. Resolution Comprehensive Plan Change .19. Resolution - Zoning Map Change 20. Resolution'- Conditional Use Permit 21. Code Change 22. Revised Building Schematic 23. Plans date- stamped July 31, 1995 (separate attachment) 11 Attachment 1 W DR. • LOCATION MAP 12 4 N CREEK z LAYER LA. 2 • `' . JAMES DR. t; .t CO I E IE� .... . • • 1OWL 0 v REG ti,,t rp u Z W • ` UPPER AFTON RD. • o ' o go c� '• CREEK•, d ' ' 9 LOWER • ' .' Q • ~ . ► RAMSEY COUNTY . ' ` • `. • CORRECTIONAL. LONDIN U. FACIL[ Y '•. .: • '. • . .• '•'' POND C O� N! C AY ' 1 .: ' o W_ _ �� ., . . .. .. .. . • ' J w o �t p��� ui V� � �YQ v O'ElAY KING A � . , ` • .' Q IrtAl USN D RD. CSR. so • TEAK o � o �.+` CRESTVIEW o OD DR. ek • • • •. • ' .• WOOD tr CT. 0 o FOREST 6 DR. OAKROGE DR. t� � • 1 6 ' 1. W HILLWOOD 2 :3 .. 1. NUNTINGTON CT. , . • 2 ' DR. v j 2. OAKRIDGE Lk -• • CC. 1. R C '• 00 0 a 0 •• • o UNWO00 Ate• • ' •...,...... .. r HL Or AVE. @ r . . r• 4 LOCATION MAP 12 4 N EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA HUMBER 11 4 N 13 � s � • r m • • _ r / R OM �i♦ :b � minor collect or _. .. Bib ■■■ ■■■N ■u - ®.i ■■■■■ now== ■ se e�T — F_ — • gram oollecto W18 • _J ow ••• ' ■ EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA HUMBER 11 4 N 13 PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 11 4 N 14 e • ; Q A • AD— • ■ mino.r q. R OWD . ®r♦, ®®� minor collector— I 1. . . Will . „ -■ R■ s =min minor collector . t on to _J il�l� t ••• ! i i 1 i 0 1 1 i l l i 1 1 1 1):= I i i l! I I I I i i! 1 1 i 1 1 i 1! / 1 1 1 1 1 1{ i .. ■ PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 11 4 N 14 Attachment 4 2632.7 mom ow� Torq L 18. 8 2. G t= OPOSED HOLIDAY �ESERVE� FOR PARK STORE SITE tor O IM 4 a H Z Q 1 �..� LOWER AFTON ROAD ,o — r r 7 43 C 0 WooDE V � LOW LAND '9go3 ZA 57 ax— ■ �p � 1. Ss h N Q •, a PARKVIEW SITE 328, 330:97 338 �2 s.p4� GHQ cooE �"s 5 . 4` 3 -rMENT 346 NC Q, Ot4NE N 358 r a.�� ` N 14 &me 46 A C. '� 368 .q�rr t�a.4rro �3 33 - - -izs t 2��.s2 c 3.6f � � � N 1 ,� iTORM 33 ''� at. �4) �I n,tr (i) at. �2) , Lk� ' `� MT C 41 � iN C C4 s 3 C4 * N st 0 C4 r ( {r� 6 S MT i ,� 370 -384 17 7. 7 *14' c r r t z � y, F- ' ' -?.0 ND qq 1� e zq• 2 0 + 7 P� o MCKNIG-HT 'T'Oww ° 6 r Cv co i 0 i 2 VT IL Vr' >* b.7 1 d 3l c,� �GovES 13 TWAU 2-1 o f PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP EXISTING ZONING N !. SITE OF PROPOSED HOLIDAY STATION TORE 1046.45 15 Attachment 0.O ..1 a z s 2 6 32.9 Tc�T� L 1 1 .� ----- R PR OPC)SED HOLIDAY FOR STOR: SITE 030 . v LOWER AFTON ROAD --- B C :•: WOODEV Of w LOW LAND 24 . 57 cu.. MEMOS ■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■�■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■ �_� ti N� Q ■ PARKVI EW TOWNHOUSE SITE o � AFAR al 941 ,33.•c . 4 oso " 8.93 124.1` r 10 b 6.4'5` fn 602 2 L Z `OAT •'� N i r 0 4C' 4 C O ac i�- Z V 4 PROPOSED ZONING SITE OF PROPOSED HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE 4 N 16 — 22 a — � t � ► � 2 9� Co 7 Q. C.• = M � STORM L (3 '$ Cs r, T. 3 - 4 on r— — — — — — — — — — — — OUTL( .*Ito i S G T tt741�z t �� ' O ►N p P IGKNt*- Townr Co -o y ? PROPOSED ZONING SITE OF PROPOSED HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE 4 N 16 Attachment 6 j � 1 � � y i r SITE PLAN 4 N t I nw� d =rrd"kt cvr, A r-i t S 1 � � atra �•a ]. • - • � 4 own *meQ CAM Silk 4 evrn R►e/ t Mt^ 609W IW .,' • r..ra.. • ter.• • • , • �� ' 1 /00040 i4wr CAM a &RM "i , ,tl 4 •; .. y , 1 1 •. �1 1 SITE PLAN 4 N t I nw� d =rrd"kt cvr, A r-i Attachment 7 Description. of Proposed Development Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road Maplewood, Minnesota Holiday Stationstores, Inc. proposes development of a neighborhood convenience store /superette with gasoline for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road to serve the convenience needs of the surrounding area. The property is a large 1.25 acre parcel fronted by McKnight Road to the west, Lower Afton Road to the north and vacant, Commercial Office District property to the south and east. Holiday's proposal includes an approximately 4,000 square foot convenience store building, two gasoline islands with an overhead canopy, and a car wash. The project is oriented to McKnight Road to serve the convenience needs of the surrounding area. The .proposal includes a small area of the convenience store building dedicated to a brand name food sales area, to be operated by Holiday. This large site is able to efficiently accommodate . a drive -thru window for this brand name food area in conjunction with the traffic flow patterns for the proposed car wash. Drive -thru and car wash customers will exit toward Lower Afton Road. At a minimum, the proposal meets the zoning and development criteria. In all areas possible, this proposal provides greater setbacks, parking spaces, and landscaped areas than required in the zoning ordinance. Holiday is excited at the prospect of becoming part of the Maplewood community. We look forward to providing a quality facility and .operation to meet the convenience needs of the area. MWN /jw5 18 Attachment 8 Rezoning Statement Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road Maplewood, Minnesota Holiday Stationstores, Inc. proposes development of a neighborhood convenience store /superette with gasoline for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road to serve the convenience needs of the surrounding area. The property is zoned CO- Commercial Office District. A convenience store /superette with.gasoline requires a BC- Business Commercial District zoning. Therefore, Holiday Stationstores, Inc. requests a zoning change from CO to BC for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. The proposed Holiday convenience store /superette with gasoline ("Holiday store ") will help serve the existing convenience needs of the area. This development will cater to existing traffic and is not intended to "draw" customers from outside the surrounding area of the site.. The site layout promotes safe, efficient on- and off -site circulation and traffic patterns. The. proposed Holiday store will provide the most advanced safety systems available. Lighting will promote a safe environment, but will not adversely affect adjoining property. Landscaping and green space is proposed to minimize any impacts the development may have on the immediate area and architectural features will be used to avoid a "commercial look" to the development. The density of the proposed development will be less than what could be developed under the CO- Commercial Office District. The quality of the proposed development should positively impact value in the area. Neighboring property to the west is developed commercially, property to the northwest is high density residential, property to the north is park land /open space, and property to the south /southeast is vacant. Surrounding property, for the most part, is already in use, and this proposed project will not detract from that use. Architecturally, the proposed Holiday store will be designed to fit the character of the neighborhood. The property proposed for rezoning enjoys all public services (immediately accessible) and will not create a demand on such services beyond existing capacities. Overall, a zoning change for this property will allow the addition of a high - quality, state - of- the -art convenience facility to meet the needs of the neighborhood. MWNrw:doc4 19 Attachment 9 Conditional Use Statement Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road Maplewood, Minnesota Holiday Stationstores, Inc. proposes development of a neighborhood convenience stare /superette with gasoline for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road to serve the convenience needs of the surrounding area. The property is a large 1.25 acre parcel fronted by McKnight Road on the west, Lower Afton Road to the north and vacant, Commercial Office District property to the south and east. The proposed Holiday convenience store /superette .with gasoline (".Holiday store ") will, at a minimum, meet the zoning and development Criteria for the City of Maplewood. In all areas possible, this proposal provides greater setbacks, parking spaces and landscaped areas than required in the zoning ordinance. Holiday's proposal will not substantially alter the commercial and retail character planned for the surrounding area. The high quality of the proposed development. should positively impact value in the area. The proposed use is not excessive for this site. and should not promote any nuisances in the :area. The Holiday store will cater to existing traffic and is not intended to "draw customers form outside the surrounding area of the site. The site layout promotes safe and .efficient on- and off -site circulation and traffic patterns.. The property enjoys all public services (immediately accessible) and will not create a demand on such services beyond existing Capacities. This development will use the highest quality materials and design features, and will employ the most advanced technology and safety systems available. Holiday looks forward to becoming a part of the Maplewood community and providing a quality facility and operation to meet the convenience needs of the area. MWN /jw6 20 Attachment 10 Holiday Companies CEN. OFFICE: 456' WEST 80th STREET / MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1224 MINNEAPOLIS, NIN' 55440 / PH. 612 -830 -87 / FAX 612 - 830 -8864 CREDIT OFFICE: 5501 W. OLD SH.AKOPEE RD. / MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1216 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 / PH. 612 - 921 -5200 / FAX 612 -921 -5295 Judy 28, 1994 Mr. Tom Ekstrand City f Maplewood JJL ty p 1830 East .County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Zoning Code Amendment for Holiday Stationstores, Inc. Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road Dear Mr. Ekstrand: As we have discussed during the past several weeks, Holiday's development proposal, for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road, includes one gasoline dispenser on two separate dispenser islands. This design promotes safer and more efficient traffic circulation than two dispensers on one dispenser island, and still meets the intent of the code with a fueling capacity for only four vehicles at one time. .We are trying to meet the intent of the Zoning Code by limiting fueling capacity. We simply wish to design the site in a manner to most effectively serve our customers. We ask for a Code Amendment to specifically allow two separate dispenser islands, as our lan depicts. We will still have only the two gasoline dispensers as required by the Zoning Code. Please incorporate this request as part of our application. Call me. directly at 830 -8767 if ou have an questions, or if you wish to schedule a meeting to further discuss our Y Y proposal. Thank you for your continued assistance. Sincerely, HOLIDAY STATIONSTORFS, INC. Mark W. Nelson, Manager Real Estate MWN:jw9 BLESS' 21 if Attachment 11 HOLIDAY COMPANIES July 19, 1995 Page 5 of 7 PROPQSED „STORE IMMACT The concern is that the market value of the five existing single family homes to the south will be negatively impacted by construction of the proposed Holiday Store. The addresses of the five homes in question and their 1994 assessed values, building age and foundation size are as follows: > 'c y sRr ?z '�'• rx .,..+a V ADDRESS } . a -0 3 - >r '� t >- ,..... ?i SESS:ED � D T O-V . -NDA O � c -.; ... �: . b •. � ..� :,. .l • .: a�.y,>7t ......::: 'st,:cv : >.i� >. %'. ;; :.,.. .,: :.:.. -;� :,r..c. r: . : +..... .. ,.. ep''.:. .., .: �".; .:'Y :. ..r.. . ai. .. ., ).'`iro �:, _.. �' kP` .... ,.... ., �. 2 ..: •::�! .. :: `.4 �;n \ ..... a - A;"".fi.:. .: ?. . \Y �.). M^ ' �• o. :d`. +:a Y : r.:.. •{ n ^' a SN. : s. Y.� �:. :i '.. ? -.;F.^ ..woo,: : -.ti :.. r.'• : S.0 >z. Y::': �••?w`' .�.r. vrryy )a, ', r'. f _ :X'w�`,y. ��SS � ", <. r ,.�., a . >.' '.d v .i . )G <:. � .'!.:' > • •K + 328 McKnight Road $81,500 1977 982 square feet 3.38 McKnight Road $80 1977 1,040 square feet 346 McKnight Road $90,000 1977 1,660 square feet 3 5 8 McKnight Road $83 1977 1,040 square feet 2271 Londin Lane $74,800 1955 936 square feet This information was obtained from Ramsey County. The home fronting on Londin Lane faces away from the proposed Holiday station site and would in no way be affected by the proposed store. The remaining four homes all front on McKnight Road (facing west) which is a heavily traveled roadway (8,500 cars per day) and are located near an existing neighborhood commercial strip center (Shamrock Plaza ). 22 HOLIDAY COMPANIES July 19, 1995 � Page 6 of 7 Implicit in the definition of market value is the assumption that the buyer is acting prudently and knowledgeably. A prudent and knowledgeable buyer of any of the five homes located south of the proposed Holiday store would inquire as to the development possibilities of the Arn old E. Johnson site. The potential buyer would become aware of the previously proposed developments and the current proposed developments (Parkview). A potential buyer would also inquire about the zoning and potential uses of the adjacent property. In short, a prudent and knowledgeable buyer would fully expect that the Arnold E. Johnson property will be developed as a mixed -use development in the near future and would take into consideration this fact when making an offer to purchase one of the five homes to the south, Th e above =e ree ardlos f whether or not a Holidav Stgre is proposed or co nstructed . o n a no , ion his site. The existing CO zoning allows for a wide variety of office and related commercial uses such as restaurants and retail sales. IN, UR QPINION THE PROPOSED HOLIDAY STORE MILL HA NO MORE OR L ESS OF AN IMPACT ON THE HOMES 10 1HE SOUTH THAN AN QFFICE -L PME T WITH RELATED USES, I S A IT ED USE ER THE CURRENT ZONING. The proposed Holiday store site IS NOT VISIBLE from any of the residences to the south. The topography and vacant commercial site to the north (which is heavily wooded) prevent any direct view of the proposed Holiday store site. From the southern property line of the proposed Holiday store site to the northern property line of the northernmost home (328 McKnight Road), is approximately 270 lineal feet. This distance combined with the upward sloping topography further mitigate any potential negative impact. Even if the vacant commercial tract in between the proposed Holiday store site and the single family homes was not heavily wooded, visibility of the proposed Holiday store site would be poor. The upward sloping topography would result in the single family homes "looking over" the Holiday store. Finally, the vacant commercial site between the proposed Holiday store site and the single family homes to the south serves as a "buffer" between the two uses. This site is zoned LBC with permitted uses including office, clinics and daycare. This is a "lighter" zoning than either CO or BC and would provide an adequate "buffer" or "step down" between the two uses. 23 i HOLIDAY COMPANIES July 19, 1995 i Page 7 of 7 It is our considered opinion that construction of the proposed Holida y store at the southeast corner of McKnight and Lower Afton Road VOIJLD NOT NEGATIVELY AHECT the five single family homes to the south. The reasons for this o p inion are summarized as follows: 1. The home fronting on Londin Lane faces away rom the p roposed ' y p p ed Holiday station site. The four homes fronting on McKnight Road (facing west) are located on a heavily traveled roadway near an existing neighborhood commercial strip center. � g g p ter. 2. A potential purchaser of any of these homes would have had knowledge of the development potential of the Arnold E. Johnson property. 3. The proposed Holiday Store would have NO MORE F QE LESS IMPACT on the homes to the south than- an office development with related uses which is a permitted p p tted use under the current zoning. 4. The proposed Holiday Store site is VIRTUALLY NOT VISIBLE from an y of the five homes to the south given the distance, topography and wooded area. 5. The vacant parcel between the proposed Holiday store site and the five single famil y homes to the south SERVES AS A BUFFER between the two uses. We hope this information has been helpful. - If you have any uestions or comments lease do q comments, hesitate to contact us. RUPPERT & RUPPERT ASSOCIATES, INC. �80�� JV[ L, rivbluunt License 4000850 �. SJR/jah 1tr2602.wpd 24 Appraiser License 4000851 Attachment 12 Huntin PROJECT NUMBER: 4140 95 -1347 PAGE: 2 DATE: Mash 21,1995 *Revised: July 25, 1995 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a plan review and acoustical opinion of a proposed Holiday Stationstore and associated car wash to be located in Maplewood, Minnesota. This work was requested b y p Mr. Scott Al au g y h of Holiday Companies on February 14, 1995 with the analysis conducted on March 17 and 20, 1995. ANALYSIS SU1IMARY & OPINION The following is based on a plan review of the proposed site and sound pressure data obtained on a similar configuration measured in South Gate, California. The estimated dBA sound pressure levels at the nearest residence straight south of the car wash entrance is 53 dB without the noise reduction and 48 dB with the noise reduction p ackage. Sound pressure levels at the nearest residence to the SE of the car wash entrance is 50 dB without the noise reduction and 45 dB with the noise reduction package. MPCA innesota Pollution Control Agency) noise standards state the L, .and L values for an NAC -1 (M g enc Y (Noise Area Classification - Residential) cannot exceed 65 and 60 dB respectfully during the daytime hours r of 7 am to 10 . m Conversely, the L10 and L values cannot exceed 55 and 50 dB during the nighttime p Y hours of 10 pm to 7 am. NOTE: L and L are levels exceeded 10 and 50% of the time. SUMMATION: If the car wash is operated durinL7 da.ytime hours onl_x and with the n_o_ise reduction ,pac no noise violation is anticipated. There is the potential for a noise violation if the car wash is operated after 10 pm and without the n_ oise reduction pa�cka *Note: • The proposed hours of operation eration will be from 6AM -11PM. It is further proposed that p p the noise reduction package will be utilized. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: A t was furnished of the proposed Parkview Development which will be located in the SE corner of p p p McKnight and Lower Afton Road, Maplewood, Minnesota. In addition, sound level data was furnished b y Nationwide wash Systems, Inc. This data consisted of a series of tables listing octave band and 1/3 octave band sound pressure levels as well as dBA and dB Linear values (these latter levels were essentially identical). See attached tables. The data listed two sets of values which applied to a Thrust Pro Dryer with and without a Noise Reduction package. A 5 dB reduction was realized with the NR package installed. Distance measurements were obtained from the car wash entrance to the nearest residence located to the AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL HUNTINGDON ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL INC REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. C0 A member of the HIH group of companies 25 L Hunt in on PROJECT NUMBER: 4140 95 -1347 PAGE: 3.o DATE: March 21 *Revised: July 25, 1995 south and southeast (350 and 325' respectively). Using the sound level data provided and the Inverse Square Law suppositions, anticipated noise levels were calculated. No provisions were applied relative to the wind or atmospheric conditions. No residences were indicated to the north or west of the car wash *within 350 feet AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL HUNTINGDON ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL INC REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF CLIENTS, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. �a A member of the HIH group of companies 26 TABLE 1 Octave Band Noise Levels (Decibels) For Car wash Dryer (Thrust Pro) With and Without Noise Reduction Package (NRP) Hertz Dr ear with NRP D er without NRP 31.5 37 38 63 53 49.5 125 61 55 250 72.5 61 500 73.3 70 1000 72 69.5 2000 72.5 73.3 4000 67.6 68.2 8000 56 r 61.8 16,000 42.9 49.9 dBA 80 84.3 dB C 87 89.3 Linear 79.7 84.5 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL HUNTINGDON ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL INC REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF CLIENTS, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. �a A member of the HIH group of companies 26 PROJECT NUMBER: 4140 95 -1347 TABLE 2 Hmtingqon PAGE: 4 DATE: March 21, 1995 *Revised: July 25, 1995 One -Third Octave Band Noise Levels (Decibels) For Car Wash Dryer (Thrust Pro) With and Without Noise Reduction Package (NRP) Hertz Drver with 1VItP Drver without NRP 20 23 30 25 19.5 29.5 3.1.5 27 28.8 40 32 33.5 50 38.2 38.5 63 44.5 47 80 52.2 51.8 100 53.6 54.7 125 55 56.5 160 57.5 57.8 200 63.5 60.9 250 65 66 315 75 78 400 71 78 500 65.2 69.2 630 67.1 70.5 800 67.3 72.8 1000 68 72 1250 66.2 72.2 1600 63.6 71 2000 67.5 70.8 2500 70 70.5 3150 65.5 69.2 4000 60.5 63.7 5000 58 60.5 6300 53.3 59.1 8000 50.5 53 10,000 47 49.4 12,500 46.1 43.1 16 36 37.2 20,000 32 29.2 g: \shared\mmfiles\rk \95 -1347 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL HUNTINGDON ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL INC REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION. OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. t? A member of the HIH group of companies 27 Attachment 13 COMNMRCLAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES The following are the City's commensal and industrial development policies: . • Group compatible businesses in suitable areas. 0 Provide attractive surroundings in which to shop and work. • Require adequate off- street loading facilities. • Promote the joint use of parking areas, drives and trash containers. • .Avoid disruption of adjacent residential areas. • Use planned unit developments (PUDs) wherever practical. Maintain orderly transitions between commercial and residential areas. � Require commensal and industrial developers to make all necessary improvements to ensure compatibility with surrounding residential uses. Require adequate screening or buffering of new or expanded commercial areas from any adjacent existing or .planned residential development. • Restrict commercial development which will result in traffic volumes which are beyond the capacity of the road . systems or generate excessive noise or pollution as deffned by state standards. • Plan land uses and streets to route nonresidential traffic around residential neighborhoods. N91 Attachment 1 ff- 4 0 oo� /OOZ 0000 .0 1 29 Attachment 15 C o^:munity Development Department City of Maplewood 1830 East Cou Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Sirs: We need more convenient-Zahopping in this area and Holiday $ with its diverse merch.a,ndise will provide for this. - The Shamrock Center, lo^ated in :the city of St. Paul is beginning to un =down appearance. This added c ompetition w ill help the have a r pp neighborhood. The town of Maplewood-."could.-.-benefit from the added tax base. The overall development of the Johnson property is well thought out and - will be an asse t to Maplewood. I believe an additional four gas purrps would be nore appropriate. The Super Americ rtore on the opposite corner has only four pumps and there are always cars waitingo loo to : I wcas not se nt ' a copy of the opinion survey as my home is located on Londin Lane - not in the im;�ediat� area of the purposed Aolida y Station Sure,. I drive by this corner every- day and I would a- :preciate this new addition to the neighborhood. Sincerely, ley Gerhard Gerth C i A. J. ANDERSON & CO., LTD. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 93 W. LITTLE CANADA ROAD, SUITE 104 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 Phone: (612) 480.8190 JU. July 18, 1994 Mr, Kenneth Roberts, Association Planner City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Proposed Holiday Gas Station, Car Wash, and Convenience Store at McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road Dear Mr. Roberts: We are strongly opposed to rezoning this area for the following reasons: 1.) We know that cutting down the hill along McKnight Road will permit a flood to occur at Shamrock Plaza Shopping Center, We were nearly flooded out several years ago when a very heavy rain storm occurred! An elimination of the hill and a large black topped area will permit the water to wash down on us. We believe this will permit very serious damage to us. 2.) A Super America gas station and convenience store already exists at our shopping center which adequately serves the convenience needs of the neighborhood. 3.) A car wash will draw people from other neighborhoods and will create further congestion and traffic problems at the intersection of McKnight and Lower Afton Road, Who will pay for signal lights and required widening of the roads? We recommend that the zoning remain the same and that the hill , not be removed and that the property be used for residential. We have served notice to Ramsey County and City of Saint Paul regarding the potential flood problem to us that would be created by this proposed rezoning. Very truly yours, � f IKow �.- -d --l"INNNNUMMOM Allen J. Anderson General Partner Shamrock Plaza Partnership 31 Attachment 17 District lCommunifty Council District l News Conway Recreation Center • 2090 Conway St. •Room 126 • St Paul, MN -55119 - (612) 292 -7828 The Maplewood Planning Commission c/o Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 September 6,1994 Rye: Rezoning, Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road Dear Geoff: Thank you very much for taking the time to meet with the District 1 Hearing Committee. It was very helpful and informative to have you there and the committee certainly appreciated your time. As mentioned at the meeting the committee and other members of the community had some concerns about the proposed rezoning, including the following: 1. The impact of increased traffic and potential need for signals at the intersection. 2. The location of curb cuts and impact of traffic flow in and out of the proposed station on McKnight and Lower Afton Road. 3. Effect of Additional run off on storm .sewer capacity. 4. The environmental impact of cutting down and grading the site and effect on the pond to the East. 5. The intensity of the rezoning from CO to BC, the highest intensity business zone. Is this zoning appropriate for this location? Would the, site be returned to CO if this project is not carried out? Geoff, thank you again for your time. If it would be alright I would like to attend the Planning Commission Meeting. May I have you send a copy of the agenda? (My fax number is 292- 7829.) I look forward to working with you on this and future projects. Best r gar4, Je fe . W hen Co 'ry Organizer CC: Ms. Garneth Peterson, Planner PED Ms. Toni Baker, Ramsey County Commission 32 Attachment 18 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION S Mark W. Nelson of Holiday Companies, applied for a change to the city's land WHEREA , p use plan from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). WHEREAS, this change applies to the 1.25 acre tract at the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road, WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: .1. The . p lanning commission held a public hearing on , 199_. City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present .written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council the plan amendment. 2. p y The cite council discussed the plan amendment on , 199_. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described change for the following reasons: 1. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's policies for commercial development. 2. There would still be a transition zone between this site and the five single dwellings to the south. 3. There is similar commercial development across McKnight Road in St. Paul as the proposed Holiday Store. Adopted on 9 1995 33 Attachment 19 REZONING RESOLUTION Whereas, Mark W. Nelson of Holiday Companies, applied for a rezoning from CO (commercial. office) to BC (business commercial). Whereas, this rezoning applies to a 1.25 acre tract at the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. The legal description is: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota,. descnbed as follows. Commencing at the intersection of the West line of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter and the South line of the North 362.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter; 9 thence Easterly, said south line 40.01 feet to its intersection with a Fine P arallel with and distant 40.00 feet East of said West line and the actual point of beginning; thence continue Easterly, along said south line, 245.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 100.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 20.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 125.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 125.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 20.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 100.00. feet to said line 40.00 feet East of said , Y , i` West line; thence Northerly, said parallel line to the actual point of beginning. g Subject to easements, if any. Whereas, the history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. The planning commission reviewed this rezoning on, recommended that the city council the rezoning. They 2. The city council held a public hearing on The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately P Y 1 safeguarded. 30 The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted on , 1995. 34 Attachment 20 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mark W. Nelson of Holiday Companies, applied for a conditional use permit to operate a fuel station and car wash on property zoned BC (business commercial). WHEREAS, this permit applies to a 1.25 -acre site at the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. The legal description is: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the West line of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter and the South line of the North 362.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest Quarters thence Easterly, along said south line 40.01 feet to its intersection with a line .parallel with and distant 40.00 feet East of said West line and the actual point of beginning; .thence continue Easterly, along said south line, 245.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 100.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 20.00 feet; thence Southerly,. parallel with said West line, 125.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 125.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 20.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 100.00 feet to said line 40.00 feet East of said West line; thence Northerly, along said parallel line to the actual point of beginning. Subject to easements, if any. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On , 1995, the planning commission recommended that the city council this permit. 2. , The city council held a public hearing on , 1995. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 35 6. The use would be served by. adequate public facilities and services, including streets, -police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 80, The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1 All construction shall follow the site plan that the city stamped July 31, 1995. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The ,proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized Within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The developer shall revise the site plan, for staff approval, omitting any parking spaces between the attendant's window and the fuel islands (code requirement). The applicant must still provide enough parking spaces to meet the code. 5. The developer shall submit a lighting plan for staff approval. Any lighting poles south of the buildings and fuel island canopy shall aim away from the residential district to the south. All lighting shall be screened or directed to comply with city code. Site lights shall not exceed one -foot candle of intensity at a residential lot line (code requirement). 6. The developer shall equip the car wash with a noise reduction package and keep the southerly door closed while car washing and drying equipment is operating. 7. The fuel station and car wash shall not be open between 17 p.m. and 6 a.m. (code requirement). 8. External speakers shall not exceed the noise standards set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (code requirement). 9. The developer shall not disturb the land or remove any trees between the grading limits of this site and 328 McKnight Road. 10. The building official shall not issue a building permit for the proposed development until the city approves a lot division creating this site and the applicant records the new deed with Ramsey County. Conditions of this lot split shall include the following: a. Dedication of three feet of additional right -of -way for the future widening of McKnight Road. 36 b. Dedication of cross easements between the Holiday site and adjacent properties because of the shared - access drives proposed. 11 The Holiday Stationstore shall not be allowed to store merchandise for sale outside of the building. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1996. 37 Attachment 21 ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING TWO FUEL- DISPENSER ISLANDS FOR MINOR MOTOR FUEL STATIONS The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: Section 1. This section changes Section 36 -6 as follows: (I have crossed out the deletions.) Section 36-6, Definitions, Minor Motor Fuel Station: A retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle fuels with a maximum of two (2) dispensers. Fuel dispensers shall be designed to serve o_ my two cars at one time. Major Motor Fuel Station: A retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle fuels which provide more than two (2) dispensers -We ' - RIAMCIA Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 9 1995. M I �.• �, 2 p L ��.7• . ,� y ..t °, nMw��i`11' ray .._F f•. ,. _ .. . tnr�•^e -, - ,+ i � � Y' MI, lu "" } I r ,� Yyp,�...i. �raisaf,as,ea,, y _ ' _ �• f i/ , , � � � � ! p r , f iI � x ,.r t ..! �i ��ewill� �s.�•n:;; �' ` ° r a° • : wz r .::� '-� ::ati• .. ` i `� ' i r � � f �F• { � � a r- -- ..,.�w�� OF . ,ereM +'F �!�SK s°`c]Y"'af"x"rt''. �.,..� - "`+ _ •� _ 1 !' s p(' r -- _ - ,��.�_ 4 L�0 ♦ � � 1' j9i • � r,� 9 e w• �f0��/�6r-� 27 R4 - �.a +Mas.a� � . � aos .gem•• , .g: s •.:.. � _ � f R r t,', .. t � � , 'f � p Y O •� � i o - - `�.. � � �� !^ `' � r ��. R,� r��� �:+�c�saei.. .� .' r�����,ans' - T � � r1 y ,���_ A v � ', , ` L aa+w.e.rew s»+•r ... _ .,. _,4• .,raor-..M�w,,,pp�� � / }y � .ty �l - � _ .it-'. �.`. �'j .vro,A��,f�. an.,s -„„� , - D. nR rrwr •�.►n���•+- ......"°+","' .. t� j �����:� � f `♦ � i 'rp + �i� '`^ �!� A � '�t,� { r t N 1 l �....�. i'"«� - ..-- ..,n, �r. ° ...4..,.� q, -s ►+ter- ..- -.+ f ,� 19 , 4 a T' Noun MEN `� • . ■ . ■ ■ �� so tt• sli! frs O dl �s l� ! t� l�ls� sY rro cells Ao� �1 _ -- �, /4r , ♦� (�~ �r lit maw "M rr wL r .�� f i Ir F !! f / ov 04 � $ i � ~ , " • { 1 f owl IL Vj 4p .dew I !" s? _ .� ' r a r Mir' F ��. • al y Ow �• .1�' r t" +r p•..,•�,r Yµ. �w ! ` J __'_"' . j� • • _ r+ISIwMI l l'.�.wtw+ -�- -- .. s•, �... v :e` _ i."i� ILI OF 4ft AIM a -- ..�.... - - ..w.. • Lim - '_•VOW A Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 08 -21 -95 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 7 P.M. Holiday Store (Lower Afton and McKnight Roads) —Land Use Plan Change, Zoning Map Change and Code Change Ken Roberts, associate planner, read the public hearing notice and presented the staff report. Gerald Frisch of St. Paul, attorney for Holiday Store, was present and spoke about the proposed operation. Mark Nelson, manager of real estate for Holiday Companies, showed the plan that was originally presented last September and then described changes that have been made to it. Mr. Nelson said they are moving everything away from the southern residents (and proposed southeast residents), adding 20 feet to Lower Afton Road, increasing the green space along McKnight Road, shortening the building, increasing the setback for the carwash and placing the carwash and gas islands as far to the north as possible. Mr. Nelson also said Holiday's intent was to serve the existing traffic. Mr. Nelson then answered questions from the commission. Acting Chairperson Fischer then asked for Comments from the public. Lloyd Peterson, a member of the St. Paul District 1 Community Council, said their concern was about the amount of traffic and asked if there was any intent to widen these roads, especially because of the number of school busses using these routes. Ken Haider, .Maplewood city engineer, said he was not aware of any plan to widen these roads.. Dennis Palmer, 338 McKnight Road South, requested that a more- current traffic study of the area be considered and that the police have greater control of speeding along McKnight Road. Mr. Palmer also commented on the number of gas stations, carwashes, and fast food places within a two -mile radius of this area. Jerry Johnson of 2445 Londin Lane, representing the Connemara II Association, expressed concern over traffic speeds and the number of youths that linger around this Commercial area. Dennis Palmer Challenged the statement that there is an average of one police call per week at Shamrock Center. Mr. Palmer said they have a statement from a realtor that shows if Holiday is allowed to build, their property value will decrease. Jerry Hickey, 2455 Londin Lane, agreed with the comments made by the two previous speakers and asked to have this item tabled until after the open space discussion with Mr. Johnson has been resolved. He felt this area, as it now exists, fits in with the open space of Battle Creek Park. Emil Sturzenegger, 2455 Londin Lane, spoke about the traffic in the area and thought the land use designation should remain BC (business commercial). Ron Hamre; 2445 Londin Lane, was also concerned with the same issues as the previous speakers. Alan Anderson, general partner in Shamrock Plaza Shopping Center, said they have put up a fence in an attempt to control foot traffic at the center. He also mentioned the possibility of ice problems on the hill from wet cars leaving the carwash in the winter. Mr. Anderson spoke of drainage concerns and groundwater contamination in the area. Richard Peterson, 2445 Londin Lane, also talked of crime and traffic in the area. Virginia Peterson, 2445 Londin Lane, read a Copy of a letter she previously sent to the City of Maplewood. This letter expressed her objection to the proposed station. Gary Ketch, 328 South McKnight Road, asked about the property valuation study that the Commission requested from Holiday last September. Associate Planner Roberts said the property study supplied by Holiday indicated that this proposal would not have a greater negative impact than an office building, which would be allowed by the current zoning. Mr. Ketch requested an opportunity to have the residents hire their own real- estate appraiser. Mark Erickson, area manager for SuperAmerica, felt the Holiday Store would definitely draw traffic from outside the area. Mr. Erickson mentioned the possibility of potential problems because of the number of Planning Commission -3- M i n utes ' of 08 -21 -95 dispensers in relation to the existence of a car wash. Mr. Nelson of Holiday Companies then answered questions that had been raised. Mr. Frisch, the attorney for Holiday, then offered some additional remarks. Since there were no further comments, Acting Chairperson Fischer closed the public hearing. The commission and staff then discussed the proposal. Commissioner Martin moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. ..Approval of the resolution which changes the Land Use Plan for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). This change based on the following reasons: 1. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's policies for commercial development. 2. There would still be a transition zone between this site and the five single dwellings to the south. 3. There is similar commercial development across McKnight Road in St. Paul as the proposed Holiday store. If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall reconsider this land use plan change. B. Adopt the resolution which changes the zoning on the southeast. corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). This change is based on the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer, police and fire protection and schools. If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall reconsider this rezoning. C. Adopt the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a fuel. station and car wash on property zoned BC (business commercial) at the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. This permit is based on the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the city stamped July 31, 1995. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Planning Commission -4- M of 08 -21 -95 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The developer shall revise the site plan, for staff approval, omitting any parking spaces between the attendant's window and the fuel islands (code requirement). The applicant must still provide enough parking spaces to meet the code. 5. The developer shall revise .the site plan, for staff approval, if an on -site retention pond is required by the Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District. 6. The developer shall submit a lighting .plan for staff approval. Any lighting poles south of the buildings and fuel island canopy shall aim away from the residential district to the south. All lighting shall be screened or directed to comply with city code. Site lights shall not exceed one -foot candle of intensity at a residential lot line (code requirement). 7. The developer shall equip the car wash with a noise reduction package and keep the southerly door closed while car washing and drying equipment is operating. 8. The fuel station and car wash shall not be open between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. (code requirement). 9. External speakers shall not exceed the noise standards set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (code requirement). 10. Th developer shall not grade the land or remove any trees between the Holiday store site and the house at 328 McKnight Road. 11. The city shall not issue a building permit for the proposed development until the city approves a lot division creating this site and the deed is recorded with Ramsey County. D. Approve the code change which allows two fuel - dispenser islands for minor fuel stations rather than one island. The number of fuel dispensers allowed shall not change. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. ""� 4 1- Commissioner Ma ft the Planning Commission meet' ime (9:05 p.m.). A. Amber Hills Fifth Addition Street, south of Linwood Avenue) Ken Rob. , associate planner, presented ff report. Bill Dolan, the developer, was e so He told the commission that he had read the report and agreed with it. Mr. Dolan answered questions from the commission. .Z' -.Z MEMORANDUM Action by Council.. TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner nda�----- .-.� -- SUBJECT: Shoreland Ordinance Modifie DATE: January 4, 1996 Rejec Date INTRODUCTION The Minnesota department of Natural Resources (DNR) is requiring Maplewood to revise its shoreland ordinance. BACKGROUND On January 24, 1983, the city council adopted the shoreland ordinance. It created shoreland overlay districts around DNR designated public waters. The regulations in shoreland districts are more restrictive than for land outside the shoreland districts. On July 11, 1988, the counci approved a change to the shoreland ordinance. This change exempted nonwater- frontage developments that would not be visible from the lake from the height and density limitations. A developer requested this change for a senior housing project. The developer had planned but never built the project on the Beaver Lake Lutheran Church property. On September 26, 1994, the council gave first reading to an ordinance revising the shoreland ordinance. Staff then sent the draft ordinance to the DNR for their approval. On December 15, 1995, the city received a letter from the DNR conditionally approving the proposed shoreland ordinance. They are, however, requiring several minor changes to the proposed ordinance. DISCUSSION We based the proposed ordinance on a model ordinance written by the DNR. Some of the DNR's standards apply to a city's subdivision regulations, some to the general zoning ordinance and some to other sections of the city code, such as water systems or sewers. We have consequently changed the DNR's model ordinance to fit Maplewood's code. The DNR is requiring the city to make some minor changes to the draft ordinance. These are mostly technical and statue citation changes. I have included all the necessary changes in the attached ordinance. The nonshoreland sections of the ordinance describe the changes from current regulations. The new ordinance starts on page 3 and the shoreland ordinance starts on page 11. Page 31 is the start of the old ordinance. As written, the new ordinance creates the following major changes from the current regulations: 1. After December 31, 1995, the city cannot issue a building permit for a new principal structure, bedroom or bathroom if a nonconforming sewage treatment system is on the property. (Section 2, page 3) 2. Minimum lot areas would not include wetlands. The current ordinance only exempts storm water ponds. (Section 7, page 5) 3. The definition of planned unit development (PUD) would require at least five dwelling units instead of a minimum of five acres. (page 7) 4. Nonconforming lots could be built on and nonconforming buildings could be expanded with certain conditions. (Section 17, pages 8 and 9) 5. For each class of water, Section 36- 566(a) (pages 14-21) creates separate standards for single, two-unit, three -unit and four -unit buildings. The current standards have only two classifications — single dwellings and multiple dwellings. The city must approve all buildings with more than four units as a planned unit development. 6. Section 36- 566(a)(4) (page 19) adds lot width and setback standards for the two creeks. 7. Section 36- 566(b)(2) (page 21) adds special standards for double, three -unit and four -unit buildings around natural environment lakes. 8. Section 36- 566(b)(3) (pages 21 and 22) creates standards for public access lots, and access lots used by surrounding neighbors. 9. Section 36- 566(c) (pages 22-23) adds standards for the placement, design and height of structures. 10. Section 36-570 (page 26 ) adds special standards for nonresidential uses. 11. Section 36 -571 (page 27) adds standards for conditional use permits in shorelands. 12. Section 36 -572 (page 27) adds standards for expanding or adding decks to nonconforming structures. 13. Section 36 -574 (pages 28-30) adds standards for planned unit developments. 1 am submitting this revised draft to the planning commission and city council for second reading. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached shoreland ordinance. p lord /shore5.mem Attachments: 1. Proposed Shoreland Ordinance 2. Exisbng Shoreland Ordinance 2 ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE REVISING ARTICLE IX, SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT AND OTHER RELATED SECTIONS OF THE CODE The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: SECTION 1. This section changes Section 28 -76 as follows: (I underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Sec. 28 -76. Individual C-site sewage treatment systems— Conformance to state standards. The owner or developer must use the city sewer system where available. Where the city en ineer decides that a municipal sewer is not available any use producinq sewa a shall have an individual sewa a treatment s stem. A sewa a treatments stem means a se tic tank and soil abso tion s stem or other individual. or cluster lyge sewa a treatment system. The ci re uires a 2ermitto install or alter a sewa a treatment system. All individual sewage treatment sy stems must meet or exceed the .Minnesota Pollution Control A en s standards. These standards are in the document titled "Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Standards Cha ter 7080 ". The owner or builder shall Provide sufficient soil borings. and ercolatio tests so the cit of ihe Cow can decide a site's suitability for an individual __se system, • nna Annetta in a SECTION 2. This section adds a new Section 28 -78 as follows: Sec. 28 -78. Nonconforming individual sewage treatment systems (a) After December 31, 1995, the city shall not issue a building permit for a new principal structure or for the addition of a bedroom or bathroom, unless any nonconforming sewage g treatment system on the property meets current standards. The city shall not consider a sewage treatment system nonconforming if the only deficiency is the setback of the sewage treatment system from the ordinary high water level of a lake or creek. (b) The owner of any nonconforming sewage treatment system the city etermines to be a ty public nuisance shall bring the system into conformance or stop using the system within thirty (30) days of receiving written notice from the city. SECTION 3 . This section changes the following definitions r in Section 30 -2 as follows: (I underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Lot means 'a parcel of land described separately from other parcels of land by a ID metes and bounds registered land survey,-auditor's plat or other accepted means. The lot descri tion 3 must be recorded _Ramsey Coun ' u. nth ;e l At I Lot area means the area of. a lot excluding drainage easements wetlands and land below the ordinary high water mark of public waters. Lot division means the division of a roe b metes and bounds descri tion. .Public waters means an waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 10317.005 Subdivisions 15 and 16. Subdivision means the separation of an area, parcel or tract of land into two or more parcels, tracts, lots or long -term leasehold interests for sale, rent or lease, ' Han of sir4main CA except those separations: (a) Where all the resulting parcels, tracts, lots or interests will be twenty (20) acres or larger in size and five hundred (500) feet in width for residential uses and five (5) acres or larger for all other uses; (b) Creating cemetery lots; (c) Resulting from court orders. Fn Wetland means a surface water feature classified as a wetland in the United 'States Fish and Wildlife Service Circular No. 39 1971 edition or Minnesota Rules Part 3420.0110 Subd. 52. SECTION 4. This section adds a new Subsection 30 -3(d) as follows: Ud The cily shall not approve a subdivision where the owner or develo er would later need a variance to use the lots for their intended urpo e. SECTION 5. This section changes Subsection 30 as follows: (I underlined the additions.) (a) Before dividing any tract of land into (4) or more lots, a subdivider shall submit a preliminary plat application to the director of community development. The director of community development shall determine the necessary application requirements and state them on a written form to be made available to the public at his or her office. These requirements shall g pplv to p lats and lot divisions. The director mav waive anv re uirements that do not. ap2lv to the proposed subdivision. SECTION 6. This section adds a new Subpart 30- 8(e)(3) (Minimum subdivision design standards — Easements) as follows: U Wetland easements. The citv mav re u a wetland eas ement over and beyond a wetland. The wetland easement shall rohibit any structu es m wo in cuttin fillina or dum in .— 4 within the easement. The cily shall decide the easement's size based on information from the watershed district and the wetland's gualily the amount and q uali!y of surroundin habitat the. site's buildin restraints. Th city may re uire. a developer to lace. nsi s around the easement boundary. These. signs shall identify the .ea, sement's bou,ndary and restrictions. SECTION 7. This section adds a new Subpart 30- 8(fl(7) (Minimum subdivision design standards —Lots) as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) (7) Lot areas. Minim 0%1 to .Minimum lot areas shall not include p blc waters, wetlands or drainage easements for storm water ponds. Lots in a shoreland _overlay district must meet the shoreland regulations in Chapter 36, Article IX . SECTION 8. This section deletes Subpart 30- 80(10) (Minimum subdivision design standards —Lots) as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) (10) Reserved. 91100F 1105e VIRUS %We oqmgg 5NO"Wor 'W'"W's 9%49 WWG%g age a "NOPWO1611OF5 5 %we 11kelmw hgwg%r SECTION 9 . This section adds a new Subpart 30- 8(f)(13) (Minimum subdivision design standards —Lots) as follows: X1_3. , where . the cily engineer decides that city sanitary sewer service is not available all new subdivided lots shall have usable space for an individual sewer treatment system and additional usable space to add a second drainfeld. SECTION 10 . This section changes Section 30 -15(a) (Lot divisions) as follows: (I underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) (a) A lot division shall not result in the creation of more than three lots. fts seems, 9 1 ANNE 6ANFIR, QOfff IF 5`40F a INF a 0 vlw 1%0 INV new 91%w� 10001WO, %a Gleor mow IF wqwglw as %we WAM The 4105 IMF% I%ffw 0 fta g 91ROU as I 101W W.VV INS' %am/ 'ROF a IDE ou %FIMW % . SECTION 11. This section changes Section 30 -15(d) (Lot Divisions) as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) d2*40irla, (d) The city shall no_ t approve more than three new I ots from a parcel or tract e�- 'at Beef IF 5`410 natant in any single calendar year. 5 SECTION 12. This section adds a new Section 35-5 as follows: Sec. 35- Water Quality Standards. Any Rublic or Rrivate sur)Rly of water for domestic wriposes must meet or exceed the water Quality standards of the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota. Polluton, Control Aaeng SECTION 13 . This section changes Section 36 -1 as follows: (I underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Sec. 36 -1. Short title and administration. This chapter shall be known a�-- shw ' as "The Maplewood Zoning Ordinance." The ommau director of community dev_elopm_ ent shall, administer this SECTION 14. This section changes Section 36.4 as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) sec. 36-4. Interpretation; controlling provisions. Un V so wa 0 r w 9 10101' wo ' The provisions of this chapter; #fey shall be i rpreted to Rrov. de the minimum requirements for the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare. Where any the provisions of this chapter conflicts ^with. any other, the most restrictive requirement shall apnl ' s %9 RAMP a n-a cif Anu -tint' ILA th SECTION 15 . This section adds and deletes the following definitions to Section 36-6 (definitions): (1 have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Commercial use: A principal u_ se of land or buildings for the sale lease, rental or trade of pr__ ducts, goods or services. Building line: The line parallel to the street line at a distance therefrom equal to the depth of the front yard required for the district in which the lot is located. For a lot fronting on a public water, the building line shall include a line parallel to the ordinary high ,water level at the required setback therefrom. Deck: A horizontal, unenclosed . platform with or without attached railings, seats, trellises or other features that are attached or functionally related to a principal Dwelling site: A designated location for residential use, including temporary o, r moveable shelter, such as camping and recreational vehicle sites. Dwelling unit: Any structure or portion of a structure that is designed as short- or long -term living quarters, including motel units, hotel units or cabins. 6 Height of building: The vertical distance between a building NOW adjoining round level or ten feet above the buildin 's lowest ground level.. whichever is lower, and the hig hest oint of a flat roof or the height of the highest enable of a pitched or hipped roof. Yoe ,wa' measuFemen' from 'he mean llawl Al UZA CIMI 'Ind 2131 dfi= thA hi 161d6MCJ iQ A 13nint MWIAMU %P`W%'OFVW'%Vm5 %mmW 40016591M VWVVW%V% 1 OP"Woosaftr Iwo %NOW x'W'%rV1 r VWVVm%MW`%fi1 ftsvamsft • new4cled that Hei ht of building shall not include chimneys, spires, towers, roof-top mechanical etc ui ment elevator penthouses, tanks or similar buil projections Industrial use: The use of Land or buildings to produce, manufacture, store or transfereoods, SIM products, - cro, mmodities or other items. Lot: A parcel of land described separ ately from other parcels. of land by a plat, .metes and bounds, registered land survey, auditors pla_ t or other acce ted means. Ramsey County must record the of description. Lot area: The area of a lot, excluding_ drainage easements, flands and land below the ordinary high water _mark of publi waters. MiningThe s or subsurface removal . of sand, gravel, rock, industrial minerals, other nonmetallic c ,minerals and peat not regulated under Minnesot Statutes. Planned unit development(PUPJ: A type of development characterized by a unified site design, with two (2) or more * principal u_ses . or structures. A P_UD may include town house apartments, multiple -use structures (such as an apartmen with commercial sh ps), or similar oro,iects Resid PUD's must have at least five dwelling units or dwell sites. Residential planned unit development: A residential use that is nontransient. r and the .arima focus of the development is not serviceon'ented. For example, residential apartments, manufactured home oarks, residential condominiums town houses coo eratives single-dwellin homes and multi le dwellings would meet this definition. Semi-public use: The use of land by a 2 rivate . 2 non rofit organization to provide a public service that is ordinarily oe n to persons outside the regular constituency of the organization. S� etback: The minimum horizontal distance between an_y,.part of a structure, sewage treatment s sy, te_or other facilitv and an ordinary high water level, sewage treatment system, , too of a bluff, property line or another structure. Setbacks shall not include eaves, gutters, cornices, steps, chimneys or projecting not more than two feet from the principal structure. OVA'AftwIve 10102 ;Anwhe..S., Th.e... measurame.M.U., .... W 1144 IWO, J 40019 %05 %ff WWWww'ROPOWN't. NOW1910054 a 'inn nerneind;v slear. to il*a -aWa or. fl-en' 'in' "ne The measummenfis %M Oman%, • 1 f. • f Sewa a treatments stem: A se tic tank and soil absorption system or other individual or cluster -type sewage treatment system. Structure: Any building or appurtenance constructed or built on the ground or attached to the ground., This does not include aerial or underground utility lines, such as sewer, electric, telephone, telegraph, das lines, towers, poles other supporting facilities. EE Subdivision: The se aration of an area arcel or tract of land into.tWor or more Rarcels, tracts lotS .Orlon -term leasehold interests for sale rent or .lease exce t those se arations: a Where all the resultina 2arcels, tracts lots or interests will be twenly res or lar er and 500 feet in ,width for residential uses and five. acres or larger for all other uses; fla Creating cemetery lots; LCI Resulting from court orders. Variance: The same as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. s • 1 the1 W 14W 'wars W W We 5 9%0 wveelsq c ., varwa RoftorWEMPS w%w %me 11010 we age 5 an 99wi %W Falls 1W 9 1Gt SECTION 16. This section changes Section 36-8 as follows: (I underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Sec. 36-8. Violations. Any violation of this article (including violations of conditions established concerning variances or conditional use permits) shall be a misdemeanor and shall be punishable as defined by law. Violations of this article can occur whether the city o_;,state reQuires a permit for a regulated tar. ahn a cti . al a E_ ach day that any violation continues is a separate violation. SECTION 17. This section changes Subsection 36- 17(h) and adds a new Subsection 36- 17(i) as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) In A property owner or developer may expand a nonconforming structure or parking lot if the structure or parking lot meets the following conditions: 8 (1) The zoning regulations permit the use. . (2) The expansion would meet the minimum ,setbacks reau red by this chaoter or the setbacks of the existina structure whichever is less. The ex ansion shall. not exceed the maximum height required by this chapter or the existing height, whichever is taller T, deviate from these requirements,- the city may aoprove a conditional use permit, subject to he standards in the city code. (3) The minimum setback from the,ordina high water level in a,_shoreland district would be at least the average setback of adjacent residential structures or fifty feet whichever is greater. (4) All portions of said structure would be aye on the applicant's property. (5) Runoff from the overhang of the addition would is not adversely affectft an adjacent property. The city shall allow construction on n onco, nforming lots that do not meet the lot size, width, frontage or depth requirements if the lots meet the following requirements: Since becoming substandard, the lots have always b_een_in separate ownership from abutting lands. IQ The lots were of record in the county_recorder's office on the date of enactment of this article. L31 There is no evidence that the lots did not meet the official controls in effect when the citv a„p raved the I, ots. An sewage treatment system meets the requirements of this code. U The zoning regulations would permit the use. SECTION 18. This section adds a new Section 36 -18 as follows: Sec. 36 -18. Variances. The city may rant variances to the re uirements of this chapter. All variances must follow the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. The city may approve administrative variances according to Article VI of this chapter. ...._.w i 9 SECTION 19 . This section changes the title to Subsection 36.438 and Subsection 36- 438(a) as follows: (I crossed out the deletions.) Sec. 36 -438. Planned unit developments generally; ' 'en purpose and intent, requirements. (a) ' ., , _ , . . ift tmAgnhAf MRAQ AnAdl=Ani •` • . A PUD may not ftwo an ar%actmen' 1*1 WV be divided unless the density distribution approved in the PUD is ensured. SECTION 20. This section adds the following subsections to Section 36-438 (PUD Common open space. The developer shall p ovide deed restrictions, covenants, easements public dedication or other egually effective and p ermanent means to p reserve and mai common o en s ace. The instruments must include all the followin rotection: 1. Exceot_routine maintenance, the cit must approve the alteration of any vegetation or topography that is visible from a public water. 2. Prohibit the exterior storage of vehicles or other materials. Storage shall not include routine vehicle „rking or the temporary storage of materials foran ongoing construction ,Mie�ct. 3. If Lon a public water, pro. hibit the uncontrolled beaching of watercraft. Owners' association.. All Fanned unit developments with common o en space must have an owners' assoc, iation the following features: 1. Each lot owner must be a member. 2. Each ,member must pay a pro rata share of the association's expenses, and unpaid association assessments can become liens on units or sites. 3. Association assessments must be adjustable to adapt to changing conditions. 4. The association must be re wonsible for insurance, taxes and maintenance of all commonly -owned Rrooedy and facilities. f The city shall designate PUD's on the official Maplewood zoning map. 10 SECTION 21. This section replaces the wording in Article IX of Chapter 36 with the following wording: ARTICLE IX. SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT Sec, 36 Authorization, purpose and objectives. (a) Authorization: State Statutes and regulations authorize Article IX. The specific sources are Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 105 (Division of Waters, Soils and Minerals); Minnesota Regulations, Parts 6120.2500 - 6120.3900 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462 (the planning and zoning enabling legislation). (b) Purpose and objectives: The purpose of this article is to provide specific regulations to protect the city's shorelands. It is in the public's best interest to provide for the wise subdivision, use and. development of shorelands. To accomplish this purpose, Article IX.has the following objectives: (1) Protect, preserve and enhance the quality of surface waters. (2) Protect the natural environment and visual appeal of shorelands. (3) Protect the general health, safety and welfare of city residents. Sec. 36562. Definitions. The following words shall have the following meanings: Average lot area: The average of the lot areas within a single development. All lots must be divided together to be included in the average lot area. For a single lot, the minimum allowable area shall be no less than the average lot area requirement. Bluff: A topographic feature such as a hill, cliff or embankment having all of the following characteristics (land with an average slope of less than 18 percent for 50 feet or more shall not be considered part of the bluf): (1) Part or all of the feature is in a shoreland; (2) The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level; (3) The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high water level averages 30 percent or greater, and (4) The slope must drain toward a public water. Bluff impact zone: A bluff and land that is within twenty feet of the top of a bluff. Boathouse: A structure designed and used solely for the storage of boats or boating equipment. Commissioner: The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources or his or her representative. 11 . Intensive vegetation clearing: The complete removal of trees or shrubs in a specific patch, strip, row or block. Nonpoint source pollutant: A contaminant that enters water by washing off the land or seeping into ground water, which alters the physical, chemical or biological properties of water or the discharge into water of any substance that may create a nuisance or make such water detrimental or harm the public health, safety or welfare. Ordinary high water level: The boundary of public waters. For lakes, this boundary shall be at an elevation delineating the highest water level that has existed for a sufficient time to leave evidence upon the landscape. This evidence is commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial. For creeks, the ordinary high water level shall be the elevation of the top of the bank of the channel. Public waters: Any waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.37, Subdivisions 14 and 15. Regional flood: A flood that represents the large floods known to have occurred in Minnesota. Such a flood is characteristic of what a person can expect to occur about once every one hundred (100) years. Shore impact zone: The land between the ordinary high water level and a line parallel to it at a setback of 50 percent of the structure setback. Shoreland: Land that is within the shoreland overlay district on the city's zoning maps. Shoreline: The boundary of a public water. Steep slope:, Land having average slopes over twelve (12) percent, as measured over horizontal distances of fifty (50) feat or more, that are not bluffs. Surface water - oriented use: The use of land where access to and use of a lake is an integral part of the normal use. Marinas, resorts and restaurants with transient docking facilities are examples of such a use. Toe of the bluff: The lower point of a fifty (50) -foot land segment with an average slope exceeding eighteen (18) percent. Top of the bluff: The higher point of a fifty (50) -foot land segment with an average slope exceeding eighteen (18) percent. Urban runoff: Storm water that flows over land or through a manufactured drainage system. Water- oriented accessory structure: A small, above - ground building or other improvement that the owner needs to locate closer to public waters than the normal structure setback. Such a setback would be because of the relationship of its use to a surface water feature. Examples of such structures and facilities include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses or freestanding decks. The definition of water - oriented accessory structures or facilities shall not include stairways, fences, docks or retaining walls. 12 Wetland: A surface water feature as defined in Chapter 1038 of State Statute (The Wetland Conservation Act). Sec, 36 -563, Shoreland Overlay Districts. (a), Maplewood hereby creates a shoreland overlay district, with its attendant regulations, as part of the zoning ordinance. This district shall overlay existing zoning districts, so that any parcel of land lying in the overlay district also shall lie in one or more of the underlying zoning districts. (b) Within the overlay district, the city shall permit all uses allowed by the underlying zoning district(s), if the .proposed uses meet the additional requirements in this Article. (c) Article IX shall only. apply to the shoreland districts on the official zoning maps. These maps shall be on file in the office of the director of community development. The city has classified the affected waters in Section 36 -565. (d) The city staff may reduce the limits of a shoreland on the zoning map whenever the commissioner decides that a public water has topographic divides that are closer to the public water than the shoreland boundary on the zoning map. Sec. 36 -564. Notifications to the commissioner. (a) The city shall send public hearing notices for amendments, subdivisions, plats, variances or conditional uses under this article to the commissioner. The city shall mail such notices at least ten days before the hearings. Hearing notices about subdivisions shall include copies of the subdivision. (b) The city. shall send a copy of approved amendments, subdivisions, variances or conditional uses under this article to the commissioner. The city shall mail all such approvals within ten days of final action. When the city approves a variance after the commissioner has recommended denial, the notification of the approved variance shall include the city council's minutes of the public hearing. Sec. 36 -565. Shoreland Classification System. (a) The city has classified its public waters based on the DNR's Protected Waters Inventory Map: The city used the following classification criteria (percentages apply only to the shoreland located in the city): (1) Class I waters are those that the DNR has designated general development waters, and the city land use plan shows at least seventy -five (75) percent of the shoreland for commercial or industrial use. (2) Class II waters are those that the DNR has designated general development waters, and do not qualify for Class I status. (3) Class III waters are those that the DNR has designated recreation development waters having: a. At least sixty (60) percent of the shoreline in public ownership, or W b. At least -fifty (50) percent of the shoreland in public ownership and less than ten (10) percent of the shoreland remaining for development, excluding public open space. (4) Class IV waters are those that the DNR has designated recreation development waters, and do not qualify for Class Ill status. (5) Class V waters are those that the DNR has designated natural environmental waters. (b) The city has classified its lakes as follows: (1) Class I waters 3M Pond Tanner's Lake (2) Class II waters Gervais Lake (3) Class III waters Casey Lake Keller Lake Lake Phalan Silver Lake Spoon Lake Wakefield Lake (4) Class IV waters Carver Lake Kohlman Lake Oehrline's Lake (5) Class V waters Beaver Lake Round Lake Public Waters Inventor]] I.D # 62 -0017 82 -0115 Public Waters Inventory_ I. D # 62 -0007 Public Waters Inventory I. D. # 62 -0005 62 -0010 62 -0013 62 -0001 62 -0011 Public Waters lnvento[y I D # 82 -0166 62 -0006 62 -0014 Public .Waters, In entory I.D. # 62 -0016 62 -0012 (c) Maplewood has classified its two creeks as tributary streams. The two creeks are .Battle Creek and Fish Creek. Sec. 36 -566. District development standards. (a) Lot and Building Standards. The following lot and building standards shall. apply to commercial developments and residential developments with four or fewer dwelling units per building. The city must approve developments with more than four units per building as planned unit developments. 14 15 With Sanitary Without Sanitary Sewer Sewer (1) Class I waters a. Nonresidential development 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 50 NA 2. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from OHWL (feet) NA NA 3. Maximum Impervious surface area (percent) 50 50 With bonus (percent)* 70 70 b. Single dwelling 1. Minimum lot width Water frontage lots (feet) 75 NA Other lots (feet) 75 NA 2. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 50 NA 3. Minimum on -si #e sewage system setback from the OHWL (feet) NA NA 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 15 NA Other lots (square feet) 10,000 NA 5. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 30 NA With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 40 NA Other lots (percent) 50 NA (2) Class II and III waters a. Nonresidential development 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 50 75 2. Minimum water frontage (feet) 75 100 3. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from the OHWL (feet) NA 75 15 4. Maximum impervious surface 50 area (percent) 60 With bonus* 4 Water frontage lots (percent) 15,000 Other lots (percent) 5. Maximum building height (stories) b. Single dwelling 1. Minimum lot width 50 Water frontage lots (feet) Other tots (feet) 2. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 3. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from the OHWL (feet) 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) Other lots (square feet) 5. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) With bonus" Water frontage lots (percent) Other lots (percent) c. Two-unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 2. Minimum lot width 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) Other lots (percent) 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) Other lots (square feet) 40 40 50 100 60 75 4 4 75 150 75 100 50 75 NA 75 15,000 40,000 10,000 20,000 30 30 40 40 50 50 50 NA 135 NA 40 NA 50 NA 60 NA 26,000 NA 17 NA 16 d. Three -unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from NA the OHWL (feet) 2. Minimum lot width NA Water frontage lots .(feet) NA .Other lots (feet) 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) With bonus* Water, frontage lots (percent) Other lots (percent) 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) Other lots (square feet) e. Four -unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 2. Minimum lot width Water - frontage lots (feet) - Other lots (feet) 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) Other lots (percent) 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) Other lots (square feet) (3) Class IV and V waters a. Nonresidential development 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 2. Minimum water frontage per development (feet) 3. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from the OHWL (feet) 17 50 NA 195 NA 190 NA 40 NA 50 NA 60 NA 38 NA 25,000 NA 50 NA 255 NA 245 NA 40 NA 50 NA 60 NA 49,000 NA '32, 500 NA 75 100 75 150 NA 75 4. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 30 30 With bonus* Water frontage )ots (percent) 40 40 Other lots (percent) 50 50 5. Maximum building height (stories) 4 4 b. Single dwelling 1. Minimum lot width (feet) 75 150 2. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 75 100 3. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from the OHWL (feet) NA 75 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 20,400 40 Other lots (square feet) 15,000 40 5. Maximum impervious .surface area (percent) 30 30 With bonus" Water frontage lots (percent) 40 40 Other lots (percent) 50 50 d. Two -unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 75 NA 2. Minimum lot width (feet) 135 NA 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 NA With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 50 NA Other lots (percent) 60 NA 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 26,000 NA Other lots (square feet) 35 NA e. Three -unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 75 NA 18 2. Minimum lot width Water frontage lots (feet) 195 NA Other lots (feet) 190 NA 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent} 40 NA With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 50 NA Other lots (percent) 60 NA 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 50 NA Other lots (square feet) 38,000 NA f. Four -unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 75 NA 2. Minimum lot width Water frontage lots (feet) 255 NA Other lots (feet) 245 NA 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 NA With bonus" Water frontage lots (percent) 50 NA Other lots (percent) 60 NA 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 65 NA Other lots (square feet) 49,000 NA *Refer to Subsection 36- 566(b)(1)(d) for requirements to qualify for an impervious surface area bonus. (4) Lot width and setback standards for creeks. a. The lot width standards for single, double dwellings, three -unit buildings and four - unit buildings in shorelands next to creeks are as follows: Unsewered Sewered Single dwelling 100 75 Double dwelling 150 115 Three -unit building 200 150 Four -unit building 250 190 19 b. Structure and sewage system setbacks (in feet) from the ordinary high water level of tributary streams. Structures Sewage Treatment Unsewered Sewered System 100 50 75 (b) Additional Special Provisions. (1) Reduction in development standards. a. The city shall reduce all applicable development standards by one public waters classification where a shoreland property meets all of the following conditions: 1. A principal or major arterial roadway, as defined by the Maplewood Land Use Plan, separates the property from any public waters. 2. The property does not drain directly to a public water. 3. The visual impact of the property from the lake surface is small. (i.e., A property subject to Class III standards may be subject to Class II standards.) b. The city shall raise the maximum allowed building height to forty -two (42) feet from any street side for structures that would be at least eighty (80) percent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline of a public water during the summer. c. The minimum lot area requirements in Section 36- 566(a) shall not apply to developments that meet all the following conditions: 1. The development is at least eighty (80) percent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline during the summer. 2. The development shall have no frontage or private docking facilities on a public water. 3. The development meets the impervious surface area requirements. d. Impervious surface area bonus. 1. The impervious surface area limits shall be determined using the total developable area of a parcel (above the ordinary high water level and suitable for development), exclusive of streets and sidewalks. 2. The developer or owner shall provide and maintain significant man -made facilities for reducing storm water flow or the treatment of runoff for nonpoint source water pollutants to qualify for an impervious surface area bonus. 20 3. The city engineer shah determine whether a proposed management practice(s) is adequate to warrant a bonus. A bonus may range from one to twenty (20) for nonwater frontage lots and from one to ten (1 percent for water frontage properties, dependent upon the pracfice(s proposed. The city engineer shall forward a copy of proposed bonuses to the DNR for their comments. (2) In addition to other standards in this chapter, double, three -unit and four -unit dwellings on Natural Environment Lakes must meet the following standards: a. Each building must be set back at least 200 feet from the ordinary high water level. b. Watercraft docking facilities for each building must be consolidated in one location. c. No more than 25 percent of a lake's shoreline can be in double, three -unit or four - unit dwelling developments. (3) Lots used as controlled accesses to public waters or as recreation areas for use by owners of nonriparian lots must meet or exceed the following standards: a. If docking, mooring or over -water storage of more than six (6) watercraft is to be allowed at a controlled access lot, then the width of the lot must be increased by the percent of the requirements for riparian residential lots for each watercraft beyond six, consistent with the following table: Controlled Access Lot Frontage Requirements Ratio of lake size to shore length (acres /mile) Less than 100 100 -200 201 -300 301 -400 Greater than 400 Required increase in frontage (p ercent ) 25 20 15 10 5 b. All owners of nonriparian lots in a subdivision who have riparian access rights on an access lot must jointly own the access lot. c. The owner shall record against the title of the affected properties covenants or other equally effective legal instruments that specify which lot owners have authority to use the access lot. The covenants must do the following: 1. Limit the allowed number of vehicle parking. 2. Limit the allowed number of watercraft that the owners moor, dock or store over water. (This shall not include temporary docking.) 41 3. Require centralization of all common facilities and activities to lessen topographic and vegetative alterations. 4. Require screening of all parking areas, storage buildings and other facilities from a public water, assuming summer conditions. Screening shall use vegetation or topography as much as practical. (c) Placement, design and height of structures. (1) Structure placement: Where structures exist on the adjoining lots on both sides of a proposed building site, the owner or builder may change the structure's setbacks -without a variance to meet the adjoining structures setbacks from the ordinary high water level, if the proposed building site is not in a shore impact zone or in a bluff impact zone. a. Regardless of a waterbody's classification, the owner or builder shall set structures or facilities back at least thirty (30) feet from the top of a bluff and fifty (50) feet from an unplatted cemetery. b. There shall be no structures or accessory facilities, except stairways and landings, within bluff impact zones. c. Nonresidential uses without water - oriented needs shall not be on lots with public water frontage unless one of the following conditions is met: 1. The use or structure has double the normal setback from the ordinary high water level; or 2. The use or structure is largely screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer conditions. (2) Design Criteria for Structures. a. Floodplain regulations: Development must follow the city's floodplain regulations (Article VI11 of Chapter 36). b. Water - oriented accessory structures: Each lot may have no more than one water- oriented accessory structure not meeting the normal structure setback in Section 36- 566(a), subject to the following conditions: 1. The maximum height shall not exceed ten feet, exclusive of safety rails. However, detached decks shall not exceed eight feet above grade at any point. 2. The maximum area shall not exceed 250 square feet. Except that on general development and recreational development waterbodies, the maximum area of water - oriented accessory structures used solely for watercraft storage shall be 400 square feet (provided the maximum width of the structure is twenty (2Q) feet as measured parallel to the shape of the 22 shoreline). These structures may include the storage of related boating and water - oriented sporting equipment. 3. The setback from the ordinary high water level must be at least ten feet. 4. The owner or builder shall use vegetation (assuming summer conditions), topography, increased setbacks or color to reduce the visibility of the structure from public waters or adjacent shorelands. 5. The owner may use the roof as a deck, but the owner or builder shall not enclose, cover or use the roof for a storage area. 6. The owner or builder shall not design or use the structure or facility as a dwelling or living space. The structure shall not contain sanitary facilities or sewage treatment facilities. c. Stairways, Lifts and landings: Owners or contractors shall not grade bluffs and steep slopes. for the sole purpose of access to a public water, where they can build or install stairways or lifts. Stairways and lifts must meet the following .design requirements: 1. Stairways and Lifts must not exceed four feet in width on single dwelling lots. 2. Landings for stairways and lifts on single - dwelling lots must not exceed 32 square feet in area. 3. Stairways, lifts or landings shall not have canopies or roofs. 4. Whenever practical, stairways, Lifts or landings shall be in the most visually inconspicuous part of a lot, as viewed from a public water during the summer. 5. Ramps, lifts or mobility paths for physically- handicapped persons are allowed to get to shore areas, if the owner or builder follows the standards of Subparts 1 through 4 above, and the requirements of Minnesota Regulations, Chapter 1340. d. Steep Slopes: The city engineer must evaluate the possible soil erosion impacts and development visibility from public waters before issuing a permit to construct sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures or other improvements on steep slopes. When the city engineer determines it necessary, he or she shall attach conditions to permits. These conditions shall prevent erosion and preserve vegetation that screens structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters during the summer. (3) Height of structures: Unless approved as a planned unit development, the maximum height of all structures in residential districts, except churches and nonresidential agricultural structures, shall be 25 feet. 23 Sec. 36 -567. Shoreland alterations. All alterations in shoreland areas shall be subject to the city's wetland and stream protection and erosion control ordinances. U addition, the following shall apply: (a) Vegetation alterations. (1) This subsection on vegetation alterations does not apply to construction of the following uses: a. Structures and sewage treatment systems b. Roads, ramps or parking areas (2) Vegetation may be removed or altered subject to the following standards: a. There shad be no intensive vegetation clearing within the shore or bluff impact zones or on steep slopes. For all other property, the city requires a conditional use permit to clear forest land that is visible from a public water. Such a proposal requires an erosion control sedimentation plan approved by the city engineer and based on the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control Manual. b. The city shall allow limited cutting, pruning or trimming of trees or shrubs in shore and bluff impact zones and on steep slopes. This cutting, pruning or trimming shall be limited to providing a view of the water from the site of a dwelling or to allow for the placement of stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas or water - oriented accessory structures or facilities. Such limited clearing is subject to the following conditions: 1, Such work not significantly reducing the screening of structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed from the water during the summer. 2. Preserving the shading of water surfaces along rivers. 3. The above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs or branches that are dead, diseased or are safety hazards. (b) Topographic alterations/grading and filling. (1) Unless part of a building permit, the city shall require a grading and filling permit for. a. The movement of more than ten (10) cubic yards of material on steep slopes, within shore impact zones or in bluff impact zones. b. The movement of more than fifty (50) cubic yards of material outside steep slopes, shore impact zones or bluff impact zones. (2) The following requirements shall apply to construction permits, grading and filling permits, conditional use permits, variances or subdivisions: 24 a. Wetlands shall not be filled without a permit from the watershed board. b. The owner or contractor shall design and conduct alterations to insure that the work exposes only the smallest amount of bare ground for the shortest time possible. c. All development and site work shall meet the city's erosion control ordinance. d. The owner or contractor shall not place fill or excavated material in bluff impact zones. e. The commissioner must authorize all alterations below the ordinary high water level. f. Topographic changes shall only be done if they are accessory to permitted or conditional uses and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby properties. g. The city will permit the placement of natural rock riprap, including associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, if the following conditions are met: 1. The finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot vertical. 2. The landward extent of the riprap is within ten feet of the ordinary high water level. 3. The height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not exceed three feet. (3) The commissioner must approve all connections to public waters. This includes excavations where the intended purpose is to connect to a public water, such as boat slips, canals, lagoons or harbors. Sec. 35 -568. Placement and design of streets, driveways or parking areas. (a) Owners and contractors shall design public and private streets, driveways or parking areas to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from public waters. (b) Streets, driveways or parking areas shall meet structure setback standards from the ordinary high water level. These facilities shall not be within bluff or shore impact zones if there are other reasonable options. If no reasonable options exist, these facilities may be placed within bluff and shore impact areas. However, the owners and contractors of these facilities must design and install them to reduce adverse impacts. (c) Watercraft access ramps, approach roads or access - related parking may be within shore impact zones if the vegetative screening and erosion control conditions of this article are met. 25 Sec. 36 -569. Storm water management. (a) General Standards. (1) When possible, designers and contractors must use natural drainage ways, wetlands and vegetated soil surfaces to convey, store, filter and hold storm water runoff before it discharges to public waters. (2) Development must be planned and conducted to minimize disturbed areas, runoff velocities and erosion. (3) Developments shall maximize the use of surface drainage and vegetation to control storm water runoff. Where surface drainage and vegetation are not adequate to handle storm water runoff, the city will allow the use of buried pipes and man -made materials and facilities. (b) Specific Standards. (1) Newly constructed -storm water outfalfs to public waters must provide for filtering or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface debris before discharge. (2) All development within shoreland areas shall be consistent with the Maplewood Drainage Plan. Sec. 36.570. Special provisions for nonresidential uses. (a) Standards for nonresidential uses. (1) Surface water - oriented nonresidential uses must meet the following standards: a. Such uses shall have topographic and vegetative screening of parking areas and structures. b. Uses that require short -term watercraft mooring for patrons must centralize these facilities and design them to avoid navigation obstructions and to be the minimum size necessary. (2) Nonresidential uses without water - oriented needs and having frontage on a public water must meet one of the following standards: a. Double the normal setback from the ordinary high water level setback, or b. Screen the use from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer conditions. (b) Mining: Processing machinery shall meet the structure setback standards from the ordinary high water level and from bluffs. 26 Sec. 36 -571, Conditional Uses. (a) In addition to the normal standards for evaluating a conditional use permit, the following standards shall apply within shorelands: (1) There would be no soil erosion or pollution of public waters during or after construction. (2) The proposed plan would limit the visibility of structures from public waters (assuming summer conditions). (3) The types, uses and numbers of any watercraft that the project would generate would be compatible with the capacity of the public waters to handle these watercraft. (b) Conditional use permit conditions: The city council may attach special conditions in shorelands. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) Increased setbacks from the ordinary high water level. (2) Limitations on removing the natural vegetation or requiring the planting of additional vegetation. (3) Special location, design and use provisions for structures, sewage treatment systems, watercraft launching and docking areas or parking areas. Sec. 36 -572. Expanding or adding decks to nonconforming structures. A deck may be added to or expanded on a structure if the deck would be within the required setback from the ordinary high water level. The deck must meet all of the following criteria: (1) The structure existed when the city established the structure setbacks. (2) There is no reasonable location for a deck that meets or exceeds the existing ordinary high water level setback of the structure. (3) The deck encroachment toward the ordinary high water level does not exceed 15 percent of the existing setback of the structure from the ordinary high water level or does not encroach closer than 30 feet, whichever is more restrictive. (4) The deck would be primarily wood, and not have a roof, screening or windows. Sec. 36 Land Suitability. Each lot created through subdivision shall be suitable for development with minimal alteration. The city shall not consider lots suitable for development that would create any of the following effects: (1) Susceptibility to flooding (2) Filling wetlands 27 (3). Building on soils with severe development limitations (4) Creating severe erosion potential (5) :Building on steep topography (6) Inadequate water supply or sewage treatment capabilities (7) Creating a loss of protected wildlife habitat Sec. 36 -574. Planned Unit Development's (PUD's), (a) "Suitable area" evaluation: The city shall determine the suitable area for calculating the density of a residential PUD as follows: (1) The project site shall be divided into tiers. Tier boundaries shall be approximately parallel to the boundary of the public water at the following intervals, going landward from the public water: Unsewered Sewered (2) The suitable area within each tier shall exclude wetlands, bluffs or drainage easements for storm water ponds. (b) Residential PUD Density Evaluation: The procedures for determining the base density of a PUD and density increase multipliers are below. The city or the developer may transfer allowable densities from any tier to any other tier further from the waterbody. The developer or owner may not transfer allowable densities to a tier closer to a waterbody. (1) To determine the residential PUD base density, divide the suitable area within each tier by the minimum lot size for lakes or the minimum lot width times the tier depth for creeks. (2) Density increase multipliers: a. The maximum base densities may be increased if the proposed plan meets or exceeds the dimensional standards in Section 36 -566 and the other criteria in this section. b. The city shall allow the density increases in Item c. below if: 1. The developer increases the structure setbacks from the ordinary high water level to at least 50 percent greater than the minimum setback, or 28 l feet feet Class I and tl waters- first tier 200 200 Class I and II waters- second and additional tiers 267 200 Class III and IV waters 267 267 Class V waters 400 320 All river classes 300 300 (2) The suitable area within each tier shall exclude wetlands, bluffs or drainage easements for storm water ponds. (b) Residential PUD Density Evaluation: The procedures for determining the base density of a PUD and density increase multipliers are below. The city or the developer may transfer allowable densities from any tier to any other tier further from the waterbody. The developer or owner may not transfer allowable densities to a tier closer to a waterbody. (1) To determine the residential PUD base density, divide the suitable area within each tier by the minimum lot size for lakes or the minimum lot width times the tier depth for creeks. (2) Density increase multipliers: a. The maximum base densities may be increased if the proposed plan meets or exceeds the dimensional standards in Section 36 -566 and the other criteria in this section. b. The city shall allow the density increases in Item c. below if: 1. The developer increases the structure setbacks from the ordinary high water level to at least 50 percent greater than the minimum setback, or 28 l 2. The proposal reduces the impact on the public water an equivalent amount with vegetation, topography or other means acceptable to the city and the setback is at least 25 percent greater than the minimum setback. c. Allowable density increases for residential planned unit developments: Density evaluation tiers Maximum density increase within each tier (percent) First Second Third Fourth Fifth 50 100 200 200 200 d. Regardless of the above, the density may not increase above the density allowed by the city's land use plan. (c) Open Space Requirements: Planned unit developments must contain open space meeting all of the following criteria: 1. At least 50 percent of the total project area shall be open space. 2. The city shall not include dwelling units or sites, road rights -of -way or land covered by road surfaces, parking areas or structures as open space. 3. Open space may include outdoor recreational facilities or water - oriented accessory structures or facilities. 4. For residential PUD's, at least 50 percent of the shore impact zone of existing developments or at least 70 percent of the shore impact zone of new developments must be preserved in its natural state. (d) Storm - water management: Each PUD must have a storm water management plan consistent with the city's drainage plan and erosion control ordinance. (e) Centralization and design of structures and impervious surfaces: The following standards shall apply to PUD's: 1. On -site water and sewage systems must be centralized. 2. The plans shall cluster buildings and impervious surfaces to maximize open space. 3. The plans shall centralize shore recreation facilities. Shore recreation facilities shall include, but not be limited to, swimming areas, docks, watercraft mooring areas and launching ramps. The number of spaces provided for the regular beaching, mooring or docking of watercraft must not exceed one for each allowable dwelling unit or site in the first tier (except existing mooring sites in an existing commercially used harbor). The developer or owner may provide launching ramp facilities, including a 29 small dock for loading and unloading equipment, for use by occupants of dwelling units or sites located in other tiers. 4. The developer shall design structures, parking areas and other facilities to reduce their visibility (under summer conditions) from public waters and adjacent shorelands. This design shall use vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color or other means. The plans shall use existing vegetative and topographic screenin as much as possible. The city may require additional vegetation to help screen these facilities. 5. All accessory structures and facilities, except water - oriented accessory structures, must meet the required principal structure setback. The plans shall centralize all accessory structures and facilities. 6. The city may allow water- oriented accessory structures and facilities if they meet or exceed the design standards in Section 36 -566. The plans shall centralize all water. orientated accessory structures. Secs. 36 - 36 -581. Reserved, SECTION 22. This section drops the definition of mining as follows: (I added a new definition in Section 36 -6.) SECTION 23. This ordinance shall take effect after the city approves it and the official newspaper publishes it. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 1 1996. 30 Attachment 2 ARTICLE DL MORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT• Sec. 36461. Purpose and Intent. (a) It is the purpose of this article to rovide for ' p r the � utilization of shoreland areas, in order to protect water quality, the natural characteristics and visual appeal of protected waters, the local tax base, and the general health, - safety and welfare of community residents. (b) Enactment of this article is provide a mechan to reduce the negative effects of shoreland overcrowding, such as water Pollution, inadequate space on lots for dr a an • facilities fl • aiaag d aa�attary flood dataages, and degradation of the aesthetic appeal and natural characteristics of designated shoreland and a 'scent water areas. (Ord. No. 534, 1 1, 1•24 - 83) . Sec* WWI Establishment of s shoreland overlay district (a) A shoreland overlay district, with its attendant regulatio art of the zonin is hereby established as p niag ordinance. This die- trlct shall overlay existing zoning districts, so that any ar�cel of Viand lying in the overly district p y shall also lay in one or more of the underlying established zoning districts, (b) Within the overlay district, all uses may be • y p ermitted in accordance with regulations for the underlying zoning district(s) if the uses meet the additional requirements established in this article. (Ord. No. 534, 1 1. 1-24-83) Sec. 36683. District boundaries, This overlay ordinance shall apply to the shoreland districts which are delineated on the official Zoning maps. Three maps ps shall be on file in the office of the director of comma . ty devel- opment for inspection and copying. (Ord. No. 534, 1 1. 1 -24-83 UU reference Environmental protection, ; 9.186 et seq. 8upp. No. 9 2325 Sec. 364U. Def tuitions. (As used in this article, the following t ms shall have the meanings ascribed to theml Average lot area: The average of the lot areas within a single development or phase. For a single lot, the allowable area shall be no less than the average lot area requirement. Boathouse• A structure used solely for the storage of boats or boating equipment. Building of record- A structure which was in existence or for which a building permit was issued prior to (effective date of this article). Lot of record- A lot recorded with the Ramsey County register of deeds or registrar of titles prior to (effective date oi'tlus article). Multiple dwelling. Any residential structure containing two (2) or more living units. 31 ZON7NG 1 86464 Nonpoint source (NPS) pollutant A contaminant that enters water by washing off the land or seeping `into ground water, which alters the physical, chemical, or biological properties of water or the discharge into water of any substance that may create a nuisance or render such water detrimental or w1unous to public health, safety or welfare. Nonpoint source (NPS) pollutant treatment - Storm water man - a8ement practices which will reduce nonpoint source pollution prior to reaching a protected water, ordinary high water mark COHWM): A mark delineating the highest water level which has been taaintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape. The ordinary high water mark is commonly that point where the natural vege- tation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial. Planned unit development A development planned as a unit which incorporates: (1) Residential and commercial land uses, or (2) Variation(s) from this shoreland overlay article or under- lying zoning district regulations relating to, but not lim- ited to, density, setbacks, height limits and minimum lot area which are permitted by negotiated agreement between the developer, the municipality, and the commissioner of natural resources. Protected waters: Formerly referred to as public waters, means any water of the state as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.37, subdivision 14. Regional fl ood: A flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred in Minnesota and that can be expected to occur on an average frequency of once every one hundred (100) years. Shoreline: Land abutting the ordinary high water mark. Shoreland• Land located within the following distances from a protected water: . (1) One thousand (1,400) feet from the ordinary high water mark of a lake, pond or flowage; and (2) Three hundred (300) feet from a river or atr mm, or the landward extent of a floodplain on such a river or stream, whichever is greater. The practical 'ts of shorelands, may be less than the statutory limits, where such limits are designated by the natural drainage divides at a lesser distance and approved by the department of natural resources. Structure: Any building, except aerial or underground utility lines, such as sewer, electric, telephone, telegraph or gas lines, including towers, poles and other supporting appurtenances. Urban runoff. Storm water that flows over land or through a man -trade drainage system, that usually contains litter, organic or bacterial wastes. (Ord. No. 534, 11, 1-24-83) 32 Sec. 36-M. £horeland - classifications. (a) Criteria for classification (percentages apply only to shoreland located in Maplewood): (1) Class I waters are defined as those DNR designated gen era] development waters in which at least seventy-five (75) percent of the shoreland area is plsnned for commercial or industrial use, as defined by the Maplewood Land Use Plan. (2) Class II waters are defined as those DNR designated gen• oral development waters not qualifying for Class I status. (3) Class III waters are defined as those DNR designated rec• reation development waters. having: a. At least sixty (60) percent of the shoreline in public ownership, or b. At least fifty (50) percent of the shoreland in public ownership, or e. Less than ten (10) percent .of the shoreland remaining for development, excluding public open space, as of (date this article ive). (4) Class IV waters are defined as those DNR designated rec- reation - development -waters net qu&1i g- for -- - Cass - -- M status. (5) Class V waters are defined as those DNR designated natu ral environmental waters. (b) Classification o f protected waters.• (1) Class I waters. 3M Pond Tanner's Lake (2) Class Il waters. r Battle Creek % --Fish Creek Gervais Lake (3) Class III waters. Casey Lake Keller Lage Lake Phalen Silver Lake Spoon Lake Wakefield Lake (4) Class IV waters. Carver Lake SIP. Kohlman Lake . -: tor t `"'' Oehrline's Lake (5) Class V waters. Beaver Lake Round Lake (Ord. No. 534, 6 1,1.24 -83) 33 Sec. 364M. District development standards, (a) Class! water& With Without Sanitary Sanitary (1) Commercial development. Sewer Sewer a. uaa building setback- the OHWM (feet) 50 50 b. Minimum can -site .sewage system setback from OHWM (feet) 50 c. Maximum Impervious surface area (percent) 50 50 With bonus (percent)* 70 (2) Multiple Dwelling. a. Minimum building setback from OHWM (feet) 75 b. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 With bonus (percent)* 60 (b) Class H and III waters, (1) Commercial development. a. Maximum building height (stor- ies) 4 4 b. Minimum building setback from the OHWM (feet) 50 75 • C. Minimum water frontage (feet) 75 100 d• um on-site sewage r1kem . setback from the OHWM (feet) 50 e. Maximum impervious surface . area (percent) 40 40 With bonus* Water frontage lots ( percent) 50 Other lots (percent) 60 (2) Single dwelling. a. Minimum water frontage 75 140 b. inim building setback from the OHWM (feet) so- With Without Sanitary Sanitary Sewer Sewer C. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from the OHWM (feet) 50 d. Average lot area water frontage lots (square feet) 15 20 (e) Maximum impervious surface area (percent) s0 With bonus Water &mtaa►ge lots t) 40 Other lots (percent) 50 34 (3) Multiple dwelling* a. um building height (stor- ies) b. Mi�nimura building from the OHWM (feet) C. m um water frontage per de- velopment (feet) d. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) With bonus* Water frontage ItAs (percent) .Other lots (percent) e. Average lot area per unit Water frontage lots (square feet) (c) clus jv and v water& (1) Commercial development. a. M building height (stor- b. Minimum buil ding ck from the OHWM (feet) c, Mini mum water per de- velopment (feet) d. Minimum on -site sewage BYBWM setback from the OHWM (feet) 4 75 85 40 so 40 10,000 3 3 75 100 75 150 75 With Without Sanitary Sanitary Sewer Sewer e. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 80 so With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 40 Other lots (percent) 50 (2) Single dwelling. a. Minim water frontage and lot width at building setback tine (feet) 75 150 b. Minimum buil ding ,etback the OHWM (feet) 75 100 C. M ine um orwd sewage setback from the OHWM (feet) 75 d. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 20 40 Other lots (square feet) 15 40,000 e. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) $o 30 With bonus* Water frontage lots t) 40 Other lots (percent) 50 35 (3) Multiple dwelling. a. Maximum boil ding height (ator- ies) 3 b. aimum building $ova the DHWM (feet) 75 c. Minirn= water !rontage per ttie- velopment (feet) 85 d. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 With bonus* Water ftnntage lots (percent) 50 Other lots (percent) W with Without Sanitary Sanitary Sewer Seiner e. Average lot area per unit Water frontage lots (square feet) 25,000 Other lots (square feet) 5 *Refer to subsection 36- 566(e) for requirements to qualify for an impervious surface area bonus. Impervious, surface area limits shall be determined using the total developable area of a parcel (above the ordinary high water mark and suitable for develop- ment), exclusive of streets and sidewalks. (d) Roads and parking ar+eaa (1) Roads and parking areas shall be designed and located so as to retard urban run-off. (2) where practical and feasible, all roads and parking areas shall meet the structure setback standards from the ordi- nary high water marker specified in subsections 36- 566(a), (b) and (c). In no instance shall these impervious surfaces be located less than fifty (50) feet from the or high water mark. : (3) Natural vegetation or other natural materials shall be used to screen parking areas when viewed from the water. (e) Impervious surface area bonus. To qualify for an impervious surface area bonus, as permitted in subsections 36- 566(a), (b) and (c), significant man -wade facilities shall be provided and main- tained for the reduction of storm water flow or the treatment of urban run -off for nonpoint source water pollutants. The director of public works shall determine whether a pro- posed . management practice(s) is adequate to warrant a bonus using criteria adopted by the city council and approved by DNR. The criteria Will be subject to revision from time to time taking into ft ' t the most recent technology. A bonus may range from one to twenty (20) percent for nonwater frontage lots and from one to ten (10) percent for water frontage properties, depen- dent upon the practice(s) proposed. The director of public works 36 shall forward a Dopy of proposed bonuses to the DNR for review and comment. (f) Water quality management plan. (1) All development within a shoreland area shall be subject to a water quality management plan, which is to be ap- proved prior to construction by the director of public works, e=cept single and double dwellings meeting the following criteria: a. The parcel is not part of a plat created utter (effective date of this article). b. The parcel does not have frontage on a protected water'. (2) A water quality ., nagement plan shall include, but not be limited to, a statement of the construction and effective maintenance of nonpoint source pollutant treatment meth- ods to be used to reduce potential water pollution aswi- ated with: a. Urban run -off, b. Soil erosion after construction is complete, and c. Soil erosion during co nstruction. These methods shall be in addition to any significant man- made facilities proposed for an impervious surface area bonus as per=mitted by subsection 36.366(e). r� (g) Elevation o f the lowest flo where no regulatory flood �1. • prot�lo��l�evatn.on has been established., no strudure � boathouses, piers and docks, shall be placed at an elevation such • '''`@ that the lowest floor, including basement, is less than three (3) feet above the highest known water level. In those instances V .,, . { where sufficient data on known high water levels are not avail- '�, �, able, the ordinary high water mark shall be used. k : • • t r (h) Drainage. All development within shoreland areas shall be consistent with the intent of the Maplewood Drainage Plan, dated January, 29 74. r G) Exemption from setback �+equirement�, Setback aquirtments from the ordinary high water mark shall not apply to boathouses, piers and docks. Location of piers and docks shall be controlled by applicable state and local regulations. Q) Reduction in development standard (1) where a shoreland property is: (a) separated from all pro- tected waters by a p riacipal cr major arterial roadway, as defined by the Maplewood Land Use Plan, (b) the area does not dr ain directly to a protected water, and (c) the visual uapact of the area from the lake surface is minimal, all applicable development standards may be reduced in re- strictiveness by one protected waters classification. (i.e., Property subject to Class III standards may be subject to Class II development standards.) (2) Not withstanding the maximum building height require ments in section 36 -566 (b) and (c), the maximum building height shall not exceed forty -two (42) feet from the street side for structures that would be at least eighty (80) per- cent screened from view from at least eighty (84) percent of the shoreline of a protected water during the summer. 37 (3) Minimum area- per -unit requirements in section 3&566(c) &hall not apply to developments that are at least eighty Oo) percent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shore line of a protected water during the sum - mer, do not have frontage or private docking facilities on a. protected water and which comply with impervious surface requireiaents. 9 . (k) Substandard lots and buildings. (1) Lots of record, not meeting the m niinum lot area require - 'ments of this shoreland overlay article, may be allowed as a building site, provided all other dimen€. sal requirements of this shoreland overlay article are complied with insofar as practical. (2) A building of record, which is caused to be substandard due to the enactment of this article, may be expanded, provided that: a. The use and expansion are allowed by the zoning ordinance. b. Where practical and feasible., the improvements will not increase the substandardness of the building rela- tive to the requirements of section 36 -566, except as permitted in subsection 36.566WX2)c, or c. The setback of the structure, if a water frontage lot, is the average setback of adjt oent residential structures from the ordinary high water marker or fifty (54) feet, whichever is greater. (1) Boathouse&. Boathouses may be allowed up to the OHWM provided: (1) They do not con taa sanitary facilities. (2) They are not used for human habitation. (3) They are no larger than one hundred sixty (160) square feet in area and one story in height. (4) They are designed to be aesthetically compatible with the natural setting insofar as practical. (Ord. No. 534, 1 1, 1.24 -83; Ord. No. 628, 11 7- 11-88) Sec. S6k%7. Shoreland alterations. (a) Selective removal of natural vegetation shall be allowed, provided that sufficient vegetative cover remains to screen cars, dwellings and other structures when viewed from the water for aesthetic purposes. (b) grading and filling in shoreland areas may be authorized by a grading and fill permit. Such permit may be granted by the director of public works, subject to the approval of an erosion control plan. At a minimum, an erosion control plan shall require that: 0 (1) The smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for a short a time as feasible. (2) Temporary ground cover, such as mulch, is used and per - =anent ground cover, such as sod, is planted. (3) Methods to Pce vent erosion and trap aediaient are employed. (4) Fill is stabilized to accepted engineering standards. (c) Excavation on shorelands where the intended purpose is connection to a protected water, shall require a permit from the director of public works before construction is - begun. Permits may be obtained only after the commissioner of natural rep ""•zeroes has issued a permit for any work on the beds of protected eaters. (d) Any work which will change or diminish the course, cur- rent or crow I section. of a protected water or wetland shall be approved by the commissioner of natural resources, and such approval shall be construed to mean the issuance by the commis-. sorer of natural resources of a permit under the procedures of Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.42 and other related statutes. (Ord. No. 534, 1 1,1- 24 -83) Sec. W4W. Onosite sewage treatment systems. (a) All on -site sewage treatment systems shall be designed and installed in accordance With the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Individual Sewage Tmatment Systems dards, (6 MCAR 4.8040). (b) All wing sewage treatment systems inconsistent With the standards in subsection 36-368(a) shall be brought into con- or discontinued Within five (6) yearn from the date of en- actment of this article. Any nonconforming sanitary facility found to be a public a I isanoe shall be brought into conformity or dis- continued within thirty (30) days aver receiving Written notice from the Maplewood environmental health official. (ord. No. 834, 11 1-24-83) Sec. 364HO. Plan revie o (a) Subdivision& (1) All plats which are inconsistent with the provisions of L this ordinance shall be reviewed by the commissioner of natu. . ral resources. Such review shall require that the p p lats be received by the commissioner at least ten (10) days before city council approval of a preliminary plat. (2) A copy of all plats Within the shoreland overlay district shall be submitted to the commiasionp `natural resources within ten (10) days of fmal approval of the city council. (b) Planned knit developments MUD). Altered Toning stand- ards may be allowed as excertions to the zoning ordinance for FM's, provided that: 39 (1) Proposals must be .approved by the department of natural resources prior to final approval by the municipality. The department of natural resources shall have thirsty (30) days from the date of written notification from the city to reply, after which time said proposal shall be considered approved. (2) Open space is preserved, that would not have been pre- served without the PUD. (3) where a density bonus is considered, the following factors are evaluated to ensure the proposed density will be con - sistent with the resource limitations of the protected water: a. Physical and aesthetic im pact of any ' density; b. Density of current development; C. Amount of public shoreland and shoreline; d.. Levels and types of water surface use and .public access; e. Possible effects on over -all public use of the protected water. (4) Any shoreline recreation facilities, such as beaches, docks and boat launching facilities are centralized. (5) The development is consistent with requirements for a PUD in the city Zoning code. (6) An approved PUD shall not be modified unless approved in writing by the department of natural resources and the city council. The department of natural resources shall have thirty (30) days from the date of written notification from the city to reply, after which time, said request shall be considered approved. (c) Multiple-family and commercial developments. Non- single- dwelling detached developments which would disturb at least one acre of shoreland, shall be submitted to the commissioner of natural resources for review and comment at least ten (10) days prior to community design review board approval. (d) Reduction of development standard& Where standards would be reduced under subsection 36 -56N), notification of the request shall be submitted to the commissioner of natural resources at least ten (10) days prior to issuance of building permit or com.mu- nity design review board approval, whichever would come first. (Ord. No. 534 1 1, 1- 24-83) Sec. X70. Variances and amendments. (a) A copy of public hearing notices to consider variances and amendments to the provisions of this article shall be received by the commissioner of natural resources at least ten (10) days prior to such hearings. (b) A copy of final decisions granting variances or ordinance amendments shall be submitted to the commissioner of natural resources within ten (10) days of final action. (Ord. No. 534, § 1, 1.24 -83) Secs. 36. 571 -�81. Reserved. ,x I -3 MEMORANDUM TO FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City Manager Environmental Health Official Code Amendment - Food and Food Handlers January 16, 1996 Icti on by Council Endorsed. -.,, Mo d i f i e d.... Reieote fat � BACKGROUND The State Health Department has directed us to upgrade our food code to remain equal with their rules, Chapter 4625. In Our contract with the state, to license and conduct inspections of restaurants and Other facilities., we cannot be less restrictive than the state. Therefore, Our food. code must be at least equal to their code. On January 8, 1996, the city council gave this ordinance first reading. The council requested several changes to the proposed ordinance. DISCUSSION Maplewood passed its first food code in 1980, and has not altered it since. However, the state has since made small changes to their rules that we must include in our code. These changes in the state rules are already being enforced in our food service facilities, so there would be no changes now in enforcement. There is one major change that the state will start soon. It is the requirement for a certified manager for all major restaurants. (Places that sell only nonhazardous foods would be exempted.) Restaurants and food handlers in Maplewood must meet this requirement or any new state rules even if the rules are not now in our code. I propose that we adopt the state's "Rules for Requirements for Food and Beverage Establishments, Chapter 4625 -Parts 4625.2400 to 4625.7801" by reference. This will eliminate the need for future changes to our food code. The attached ordinance does this and has the changes that the council asked for. The licensing and enforcement sections of our code would remain unchanged. In 1980, Maplewood adopted the state Swimming Pool and Lodging Establishment rules by reference. This has worked out well. RECOMMENDATIONS Adopt the attached ordinance. This ordinance: 1. Deletes Sections 13 -17 through 13-41 of the Maplewood City Code. 2. Adds Chapter 4625— Parts 4625.2400 to 4625.7801 of the State Health Department rules by reference to Section 13 -17 of the city code. p:ordlfood.ord Attachment: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE REGULATIONS FOR FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of g 9 p Ordinances: Section 1. This section changes the food establishment code b deleting the existing Y g g Sections 13 -17 through 13 -41. Section 2. This section adds a new Section 13- 17--- Minnesota Department of Health Rules adopted by law. Section 3. Subject to any specific modifications set forth afterthis, Maplewood adopts by reference Minnesota State Board of Health Rules Chapter-4625, Parts 4625.2400 to 4625.7801 as contained by law in the document entitled Rules and Requirements for Food and Beverage g Establishments, and all subsequent amendments thereto in effect on December 31, 1995. A copy of such regulations. shall be filed and available for inspection in the office of the city clerk and the department of community development. Chapters 4625.2400 to 2625.7801 are hereby modified by deleting the terms "Board' and "Commissioner" and substitute the term "Environmental Health Official," in place thereof, or Other successor desi Hated or authorized b the city council. g y The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on j1996. , t t 4 AGENDA ITEM J" AGENDA REPORT Acti b C0Un TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer M0d ifje�.. Y g Rej ecte d,... SUBJECT. Pondview Apartments —No Parking Request DATE: January 12, 1996 The attached letter from Pondview Apartments requests no parking signs be installed around the cul -de -sac at the end of Ivy Street. The no parking zone would make it easier for school buses to turn around in the cul -de -sac. There certainly is adequate off- street parking for the apartments. Staff has no objection to establishing a no parking zone. It is recommended the city council establish a no parking zone around the cul -de -sac at the end of Ivy Avenue East, and further direct the public works department to erect appropriate signage. KGH jc Attachments A • .... rti 2575 Ivy Avenue East Maplewood, Minnesota 55119 January 2, 1996 City Council City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road 6 Maplewood, MN 55109 Attn: City Engineer 770 -5877 (Fax 770 -1582) This is a request to have No Parking Signs ns installed around the cul -de -sac at the end of Ivy Avenue E. The Maplewood, North. St. Paul, Oakdale School District will bring their school buses up to the cul -de -sac only if certain conditions are met. One of those conditions is that No Parking Signs. be installed around the cul -de -sac to facilitate their buses turning around in the cul -de -sac. Previously, the School District approved the. elementary school buses to load /unload at the cul -de -sac, but not the middle school or high school buses. This request is 9 q an attempt to fill the School District requirements in order to have all buses p brought u to the cul -de -sac. 9 Sincerely Yours, c Cindy Salmon Resident Manager C'. KVI 1_ACG (. O AGENDA ITEM Too °Z AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Driveway Ordinance -First Reading DATE: January 16, 1996 Act* 011 by ^x Rej e Attached is a revised driveway ordinance proposal. The current driveway ordinance is twelve pages in length. The revised proposal has significantly shortened g Y the ordinance, mainly by reducing the verbiage requirements. The only change of the dimensions of driveways is the maximum residential width 32 feet. Otherwise the actual requirements for driveways are unchanged. Staff recommends the replacement of the existing driveway ordinance with the attached proposal. The first reading of the new ordinance could be completed at the January 22, 1996 city council meeting. RAM Attachments ARTICLE IV, DRIVEWAYS DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Section 29 -86. Purpose of article. The purpose of this article is to establish design standards for driveways Y providing access to and from private property located along and adjacent to public street right of way. Sec. 29 -87. Scope of article The scope of this article is intended to be consistent with Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.18, subdivision 3. Sec. 29 -88. Definitions. The following words, terms, and phrases shall have the followin g respective p meanings: Corner clearance: On property adjacent to a street intersection, the distance between the edge of the street right of way ot intersected b the driveway and the y Y Y nearest edge of the driveway. 4. Double driveways: Connected driveways that provide ingress and egress to the street right of way at two separate accesses from a single property Driveway width: Distance at the narrowest point between parallel edges of the driveway. The width shown includes surface, shoulders, or g utters. Sec. 29 -90. General regulations. (a) If the terms of a permit issued under this article are violated, the director of the public works department may revoke the access. (b) A driveway turn - around must be constructed with each new home fronting on an arterial street, as designated in the city's comprehensive plan. (c) A variance from the standards set forth in this article may be allowed by the public works department when the variance will facilitate a safe, efficient use of the property without interference to the construction, maintenance, or safe and efficient use of the adjacent property and the street and its appurtenances. (d) The community design review board will review all commercial driveway permit applications as part of the review of the commercial property improvements. Secs. 29- 91--29 -100. Reserved. DIVISION 2. CONSTRUCTION AND STREET- ACCESS PERMITS Sec. 29 -101. Required. • Authorization to construct or alter a driveway shall consist of a permit issued b the public works department. Supplemental permits may also be required by other governing authorities. No alterations to driveways may be made at an time without . Y permission from the public works department. Sec. 29 -102. Applications. As a part of the permit application, a driveway Y or p layout, Ian view, of the property and proposed driveway shall be submitted. The plan view shall include buildings and any other relevant present or planned appurtenances. Layouts shall be drawn to scale or fully dimensioned on a reproducible sheet of paper. Sec. 29- 103 -29 -115. Reserved, DIVISION 3. CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Sec. 29 -116. Dimensions. The approved driveway widths are as follows: Residential: minimum-12'(3.65 m), maximum-32'(9.75 m) The approved minimum distance between nearest edges of double driveways is 20' (6.10 m). The approved corner clearances are as follows: Arterial street: 30' (9.15 m) Nonarterial street: 30' (9.15 m) Sec. 29 -117. Gradient. The profile of the driveway shall slope upward from the edge of the street, at a minimum, to the edge of the right of way. The maximum gradient shall be thirteen (13 percent. Sec. 29 -118. Driveway angle. The angle between the driveway and the intersecting street right of way shall not be less than sixty (60) degrees. Sec. 29 -119. Location. Driveways shall have a setback of at least five (5) feet (1.5 m) from the side or rear lot lines, except by written agreement with the owner of the adjacent lot. Sec. 29 -120. Enforcement. If a driveway is constructed contrary to this article, the city may require that the driveway, or a portion thereof, be removed. Secs. 29- 121 -29 -135. Reserved. C7ww 3 1, ,T. MEMO UM To: Michael A. Mc ire Ci e From: Bruce K. Anderson, & ecrea Subj: July 4th Celebration Date: January 12, 1996 For the January 22, 1996, ity Council Meeting Action by Council Endorsed..... Mod.ifid..�. Re . Date Introduction Mayor Gary Bastian and the City Council received a letter dated September 28, 1995, from Toe Fob Secretary of the Ramsey County Agricultural Society. Mr. Fox requested that the City Council consider the possibility of supporting a joint venture with the Ramsey County Fair Board in 1996. This issue was discussed briefly at the City Council/Manager meeting on January 4, 1996. The City Council requested that this issue be placed on the January 22nd agenda. Background The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Department has sponsored a community Fourth of July Celebration for the past twenty -plus years. The July 4th Celebration was orig inally held at Wakefield Park and was relocated to Hazelwood Park three years ago. The City Council has allocated $15,000 for the July 4th Celebration in 1996, which is rimaril used for the fireworks p Y display. I have attached a memorandum dated December 27, 1995 which outlines some of the issues that need to be considered prior to making a decision. It is my understanding that Joe Fox will be out of the country on January 22 and will not be able to attend the meeting. I have had the oppor- tunity to speak with Mr. Fox on this issue and he requested that the City Council begin to address this issue, as a decision will need to be made for long - range planning, no later than March 1, 1996. Recommendation It is my recommendation that the City Council consider the letter from Joe Fox dated Septem- ber 28, 1995, regarding the Ramsey County Fair Celebration and provide staff with a recom- mendation. r a� hEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuire, er From: Bruce 'K. Anderson, & Recreation Subj: July 4th Celebration Date: December 27, 1995 Our department has sponsored the community July 4th Celebration for the past twenty -plus years. The July 4th Celebration was originally held at Wakefield Park and has been relocated to Hazel- wood Park This is a one day event with a budget of approximately 525,000, which includes a magnificent fireworks display. In 1995, the July 4th Celebration was rained out snd the fireworks were held in conjunction with the Ramsey County Fair, following the White Bear Avenue Parade. This proved to be a very popular event for the Ramsey County Fair and the fireworks was well attended. It is extremely difficult to measure large groups of people, but I believe the crowd was as large for the fireworks following the White Bear Avenue as it bas been in previous years at Hazelwood Park on July 4th. .Mayor Gary Bastian received a letter (see attached) from Toe Fox, Executive Director of the Ramsey County Fair Board, requesting that the city establish a new tradition for our comawnity celebration. His specific request was for the city to sponsor the fireworks, along with other activities, in conjunction with the Ramsey County Fair and the White Bear Avenue Parade. I believe there is some merit to this suggestion. The following issues should be considered by the City Council: 1. The current Fourth of July Celebration is a one day event. 26 The city expends a large amount of money (525,000 in 1995) for fireworks and related bands.. 3. The Ramsey County Fair is a four day celebration, which includes bands, carnival rides and a variety of activities ranging from Petting Zoos to Art Fairs to commercial eau' bits. 4. The White Bear Avenue Business Association sponsors a parade, which culminates at the Maplewood Community Center. 5. The location of the Ramsey County Fair and the White Bear Avenue Parade in relationship to the Maplewood Community Center and City Hall is ideal. 6. Our department sponsored two successful events as part of the Ramsey County Fair in 1995; the first being the World's Largest Pog Tournament; and the second being an In -Line Skate Race down White Bear Avenue. 7. The city could potentially gain Seater exposure by having a longer Festival and incorporating activities and/or events at the Maplewood Community Center, as well. 8. It is always difficult to get volunteers to coordinate a Festival of this aiu and scope. By tying in with the Ramsey County Fair Board and White Bear Avenue Business Association, we have a broad base of support already in place. 9. One of the original reasons for establi shment of a July 4th Celebration is that there were not any fireworks on the northeast side of the Twin Cities. There are now fireworks displays in the cities of Woodbury, Roseville and Taste of Minnesota. The downside of joining the Ramsey County Fair and White Bear Avenue Business Association is: 1. The city might lose some identity. 2. There has been a stung tradition of the Maplewood Fourth of July Celebration. 3. The Fourth of July Celebration could be expaaded I to include the Maplewood Mall as a co- sponsor, especially Dayton's, and be expanded to a two to four day event. 4. Parking may become a problem, should the celebration become too large on White Bear Avenue during the Ramsey County Fair and the White Bear Avenue Parade. 5. The city may lose its identity and/or name associated with the Fourth of July Celebration. It would be my recommendation that this issue be placed on the City CouncilUanager agenda for future discussion. c: Pauline Staples, Recreation Program Manager Joe Fox, Ramsey County Fair Board i a R AMSEYCOUN7YAGI ICU LT� SOCIETY 182111fj+nk S'saet XapleK�oo� JI�n,�o�a SS109 September 28 1995 Gary Bastian, Mayor City of Maplewood 1834 E. County Road B OMCTM Maplewood, Mn 55109 Rno Ericluon dew Dear Mayor Bastian and members of the City Council: 77K2S4 The 1945 Ramsey County Fair is now history and our evaluations cominue to till us that we Vice � a very �ccessful fair. Success can be measured in many di$erent ways but the one measure that Vce�deat was obvious to me was the cooperation from the business and public community that worked to not fF Joe Fox on1Y keep the fair in teas area but made signi5caat financiAl Bad leadership contributions to the many Secretary new programs. Tt76$14 pf course we all know that the City's contribution of the fireworks was the highlight of this year's fair and the signi£icarrt increase in att endance that evening supports that observation. But your Off GlIberuO° support to the fair didn't start or end with the 5revvorks. Sta#'manbers is the Parks and Recreation Traunrtr Department most helpful throughout the planning Process. which started several months before the fay. Your Parks Department sponsored events provided visibility for the City of Maplewood and DDtECTORS they also co- sponsored and supported other important events during the fair. I can't say enough • about the positive and creative leadrrship from -those staff manbers who helped with this year's -fair. Dee Barber This then leads me to address the futuve and the planning for the 1996 Ramsey Courrty Fair D"'ja B°d°" which will beheld July 24-28, 1996. A comnnunty celebration involving the White Bear Business ' Rick Houle N p� Assoc., the City of Maplewood and the Ramsey Fair would benefit this whole area. If you sad the Candy Petersen city council would support this joint venture I feel we need to make-some planning decisions for the Robert Ptei"ad 1996 fair within the next few months. Would you or someone on your staff give a call regarding your R&M SebWdt views with this idea? . 5b'r°n Sdftp ThereL is one more item Mayor that I would like to address. We have had many requests to have Bingo P I" e dL again at the count' fair• The civic organizations in Maplewood for one reason or another cannot qualify or do not choose to obtain a bingo permit. The city ordinance would need to be changed to allow other civic groups outside of Maplewood to apply. Since the fair is a county wide event we would benefit by having other groups participate in this way. Please give this your consideration. Thanks again for Maplerovood's support of the 1995 Coun air. �►� X08 FOX, SeCf C.C. Michael McQuire, Bruce Anderson, Collen Dirkswager liamsey Caunh Fair ..... ,inly 19. 23,1995 Jim 4 MEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manage From: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of P s e r tion Subj: Landscape Architect Selection for dgerton Date: January 10, 1996 For the January 22, 1996, City Council Meeting . 3tion by CnunoI 14o aif J e . Re j e ct e rl -�--°r Introduction The Maplewood City Council authorized the solicitation of requests for proposals for Master Plans for Edgerton and Carver Park/School sites. A R.F.P. was forwarded to five architecture firms in December 1995. 1 shordisted the landscape architecture firms to three, which were formally interviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission at a Special Meeting on Monday, January 8, 1996. Background The City of Maplewood has worked in close cooperation with Independent School District #622 and School District #623 to develop satellite Community Centers at Edgerton and Carver Ele- mentary Schools. To fully utilize and develop the Community Center concept, it was determined that Master Plans would be beneficial for the outdoor facilities at Edgerton and Carver Elemen- tary Schools. The proposals ranged in professional service fees from $8,740 to $19,200. The Park and Recreation Commission conducted formal 1/2 hour interviews, which consisted of a fifteen to twenty minute presentation from each of the respective firms, followed by a ten to fifteen minute question and answer session. Based on the formal interviews and the written pro - posal, it was the unanimous recommendation of the Park and Recreation Commission that Brauer & Associates be retained to provide Master Plan services for Carver and Edgerton Elementary Schools. I have placed a copy of Brauer Professional Services Proposal for City Council review m the Council office. Staff concurs with the Park and Recreation Commission recommendation based on the following criteria: 1. Brauer & Associates has a positive track record with the City of Maplewood, having developed Master Plans for three Neighborhood Parks including Pleasantview, Timber and Western Hills Parks. 2. Both the Park and Recreation Commission and staff have experienced a very positive working relationship with Brauer & Associates. They are imminently qualified to provide the Master Plan services, as outlined. 3. Brauer & Associates has had past work experience in working with Hmong and Asian populations, who will be users at the Edgerton School/Park Complex. 4. Brauer & Associates has joint - ventured in their proposal with the USA Aquatics firm located in Minnetonka. The Park and Receation Commission anticipates that develop- ment of a water resource would be a positive amenity at both Edgerton and Carver. Mr. Thomas Shaefer, a principal in USA Aquatics, has designed, built and/or managed over forty aquatic facilities since 198.8 in the five State area. The two most notable were the Shoreview and Chaska Community Center pool facilities. 5. The proposed fee structure by Brauer & Associates was $13,900. Their fee structure was in the middle of the proposals submitted. Based on this verbal construction document cost of 5% to 7 %, as contrasted with an estimate of 7% to 9% by the other two interviewed firms, the proposals become a moot point. 6. Brauer & Associates is able to meet the proposed timeline to have construction documents completed by April 1 for a mid -April bidding. Recommendation It is staffs recommendation that Brauer & Associates be retained to develop Master Plans for Edgerton and Carver Community Center/Park sites. I have spoken with representatives from both Maplewood School District #622 and Roseville School District #623 and they concur with the proposed staff and Park and Recreation Commission recommendation. AGENDA NO. S�- (a TO: Cit Mana AGENDA REPORT FROM: Finance Director ���� RE: AUDIT OF FIRE DEPARTMENTS DATE: Januar 11, 1996 PROPOSAL Action b Cou ncil: Endorsed..-..-. Modif ied...... Re ected........ Date It is proposed that the fiscal y ear 1995 audit of the independent fire departments be dela one y ear and that the audit for fiscal y ears 1995 and 1996 be done to in 1997 to minimize costs. BACKGROUND The last audit of the independent fire departments covered fiscal y ear 1994 and was completed in 1995. , No appropriation was included in the 1996 Bud for the fiscal y ear 1995 audit of the independent fire departments. It would be more cost effective to complete the audit for fiscal ye ars 1995 and 1996 to in 1997. The cost for an audit annuall is $12,300 per y ear for a total cost of approximatel $24,600; a sin audit report coverin two y ears would cost approximatel $17,400. As an alternative, if the Council believes an audit should be done now for fiscal y ear 1995, mone is available in the General Fund contin account. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the fiscal. y ear 1995 audit of the independent fire departments be dela one y ear and that the audit for fiscal y ears 1995 and 1996 be done to in 1997 to minimize costs. PAMNANCEWMAGNTIREAU95MM AGENDA NO. 1 AGENDA REPORT TO: Cit Mana FROM: RE: DATE: Finance Director COMMUNITY CENTER FINANCIAL REPORT Januar 16,1996 A Action b Council .. Endorsed Modified..... Re Date The resolution adoptin bud policies for the communit center provided that it's income statement be placed on the Council a ever three months for public discussion. Attached are g raphs summarizin financial data for the y ear ended December 31, 1995. Also attached are the financial statements for the same period. It is important to note that these are PRELIMINARY financial statements that are subject to. further adjustments. Most of the adjustments will probabl involve increases to the operatin expenses as we are still processin 1995 invoices for the Communit Center. The first g raph shows operatin revenues and expenses b q uarter. Quarterl revenues have ran from a low of $252,609 for the third: q uarter to a hi of $328,450 for the first q uarter. The total operatin revenues for the twelve months were $'!,161,689. Quarterl expenses were the hi at $422,153 in the fourth q uarter and the lowest at $290,289 in the third q uarter. The total operatin expenses for the twelve months were $1,437,023. The second g raph attached shows the q uarterl y operatin losses before depreciation. There has been a net loss ever q uarter. The lar net loss was $111,602 for the third q uarter and the lowest was $14,948 for the first q uarter. The total operatin losses for the twelve months were $275,334. The third pa attached is an income statement for 1995. , The lar sources of operatin revenues were memberships and dail fees. Membership revenues were $477,267 and dail fees were $331,573. The lar operatin expenses were for the office and buildin maintenance. Office expenses were $399,182 and buildin maintenance was $269,764. The fourth pa attached is a cash flow statement for 1995. It indicates. the Communit Center Operations Fund cash balance chan from a positive balance of $172,949 on Januar 1 st to a cash deficit of $101,500 on December 31, 1995, The fourth q uarter had the lar positive cash flow and it was $59,117. The second q uarter had the lar ne cash flow and it was $2'10,437. Communit Center Financial Repo Januar 16, 1996 Pa 2 The fifth pa attached is an income statement for 1995 with comparative data for 1994. The total operatin losses for 1995 were $275,334 and for 1994 the were $166,975. The 1996 Bud provides for a transfer from the General Fund to the Communit Center Operations Fund to finance the 1994 operatin loss. The increase in the operatin loss for 1995 will probabl re an increase in the transfer from the General Fund to the Communit Center Operations Fund in the 1097 Bud The sixth pa attached is a cash flow statement for 1995 with comparative data for 1994. It indicates the Communit Center Operations Fund had a positive cash flow of $172,949 in 1994. In 1995 it had a ne cash flow of $274,449. PAF1NANCE\WP\AGNXCC1N1295.WPD COMMUNITY CENTER OPERATIONS FUND Operating Revenues and Expenses For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 1995 Ruands Nsoo $14W $1200 $1000 $8W $600 $400 $200 $0 Ist Qt. 1995 2nd Qt. 199S 3rd Qt, 1995 4 Q1r 1995 1995 TOW Reveries Expenses 1 PAFINANCE \WP\AGN \REVEXP95.CHT 1 st Qtr. 1995 2nd Qtr. 1995 3rd Qtr. 1995 4th Qtr. 1995 Total Revenue $328,450.00 $269,581.00 $252,609.00 $311,049.00 $1,161,689.00 Expenses $343,398.00 $381,183.00 $290,289.00 $422,153.00 $1,437,023.00 PAFINANCE \WP\AGN \REVEXP95.CHT COMMUNITY CENTER OPERATIONS FUND Operatin Income (Loss) Before Depreciation For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 1995 SO .......... . .................... 0$141948 . $50 , 000 ..... ...... ................. I-- .......... ........... ............ ................. ................. ............ ........... ............. ................. .............. ................. 4 100 , 000 ................. ................. ................. ................. ................. ................ ............... . .......... � . . . ..:., -$1111602 -$111,104 41501000 -$200,000 - $250,000 -- -$3001000 1 si Qtr. 1995 2nd Qtr. 1995 3rd Qh. 4th QIr. 1995 Total PAF1NANCEkWP\AGN\1NCDEC95.CHT -$2751334 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Community Center Operations Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings For the Year Ended December 31, 1995 PRELIMINARY PROD. NO. 1 st Quarte 2nd Quarte 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Tota Operating Revenues: 001 Memberships $ 102 114 122 137 477 001 Daily fees 126 75 65 63,565 331,573 002 Concessions 37 23,073 20,036 21 102 021 Theater fees 7 10 6 32 56,204 022 Banquet room fees 19 14 16 24,221 75 023 Day care fees 6 6,833 5 5,074 23 061 Pool fees 7 16 7 5 37 062 Gym fees 747 545 1,055 9,234 11,581 063 Multi- purpose room fees 8,325 3 2 5,191 19 064 Exercise fees 11,220 3 4 6 25,992 Total 328,450 _- 269 _ _ 252 311 1,161, 689 Operating Expenses: 001 Office 101 127,296 69,808 100 399 002 Admission desk/concessions 48,254 43 40 47 179,549 021 Theater 9 8 1 33 52 022 Banquet room 6 6 6 10 28 023 Day care 11 8,428 8 12 40 061 Pool 52 46,825 47 59 205 062 Gym 7 6,130 5,994 16 36,552 063 Multi- purpose room 106 0 568 0 674 064 Exercise programs 19 20 13,445 12,246 65,807 Building Maintenance 62 77,246 55 74,585 269 Utilities _ 23 37, 41,519 55 157,694 Total _ 343,39 381,183 290 _ 422,153 1,437,023 Operating income (loss) before other revenues (expenses) (14,948) (111,602) 37,680 _ X111,104) 27 Other revenues (expenses): Interest on investments 2 941 (1,317) (1,831) 621 Miscellaneous revenues 0 214 135 39 388 Depreciation (62,796) (62,796) (62,796) (62,796) (251,184) Investment management fees (266) (81) 0 1 (346) Miscellaneous expenses (12 _ (1 (400) (1 _ (3,314) Net Total (60,357) (62,80 _ - -- - (64,3 -- - -- - (66,2 1 -- - -- - ) (253,835) Net income (loss) - - -- (75,305) (174,411) - - (1 02,0 58) (17 ) _...___ (529,169) - Retained earnings - beginning (144,767) (220,072) (394,483) (49 6,541_) - (1 44,767) Retained earnings - ending $ 2� 20,072) (394,483) (496,541) (673,936) (673,936) PAFINANCE\ 123R5W\MISC\COM 1ST CITY OF iii APLEWOOD, Mii+iNESO i A ,'nM Mi�lnitu f :render OparaticnS F tatevi'f'lent ©f Sz5our ces and Appl of vi as oI tl ie i LE ndeu D e c e m & Der .i 1 , i W :, � Sources tJf caSl1. Net into a ( V?s) Add de preciatiuill ( decrease in curr assets increase kdecrease) in deferred revenue increase (uecre 111 other Ilau'IiitieS 1 Mai Applications of cash: Purchase of fixed assets Net i (decrease) in cash Beginning cash balance I - "REL I Mi NAR % 1 5 t t, tl 1) i U/ - k1 l f ,395) k je-U,I UU) 6 el l . UL�, f 9U 62 UL, t . 201 1 U t 2 U 0 tLJ,L.5U (2 0 1 U 33) cl Ui ` JG 888 t ) o �L, s %� i tC1`i 1) %' `i iri ,fi t b► i `=" i ' 50 ,ti.1 1 J' 1 k`t:�,. F) 1 6 1 .7.�) J. tJ�EJJ FLU, �tJirJ) 1 s 9.. � L,�J i /° J� r t tL 1 L), t) Z .:iiii t 1 Jet, VJL) ♦.7�, 1 t �' ,i sl `t tL t ,��) I L VV 1 , sn ii � L 1 tJ,�l) r =? 30% ) tl JaU,i,JJV ;� �J�7, f 1 l Ll `�,4s9 t 4 �''.�' n' % i 1 UJ, 45 0 ('22 49981 ) i 'Z 4 t 1 60, 1 ii �t� 4 Std t1 W F yy, 4j (-)A f QR A 7\ � -)T, F X A 9 f 4 4 7\ f F n F F � t4 F n4 cznnN � a} F ,�l. } f 4 n4 rnnx i F ►,ss F ,�4+4�'� CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Community Center Operations Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings PRELIMINARY December 31 PROG. 1995 1994 NO. December YTD. Decemb YTD. Operating Revenues: 001 Memberships 46 477,267 36,696 55 001 Daily fees 23,894 331 11 75 002 Concessions 8 102 8 24 021 Theater fees 5 56,204 2 2 022 Banquet room fees 6 75 5 11 023 Day care fees 3,529 23,694 1 2 061 Pool fees 4,957 37 2 5 062 Gym fees 856 11,581 262 1 063 Multi- purpose room fees 2,039 19 2,228 5,275 064 Exercise fees 2,176 25 1,425 3,095 Total 104 _ ..- ------------- -- ___.._ 1 ,161, 68 __ . __ __.... ........ ..- - -_.._ -_ _ 72,465 _ _._ 1881251 Operating Expenses: 001 Office 36,664 399 31 104 002 Admission desk/concessions 21,616 179 16 48 021 Theater 21 52 96 96 022 Banquet room 4,252 28 1 2 023 Day care 1 40 2 14 024 Senior lounge 0 0 0 65 061 Pool 19,326 205 18,700 47 062 Gym 5 36 2 6,845 063 Multi- purpose room 0 674 89 142 064 Exercise programs 5,794 65,807 17 24,796 Building Maintenance 31,852 269 24,303 81,537 Utilities 5, 376 157 23,537 24,830 Total 153 139, 904 ^ _ 355 2 26 1 Operating income (loss) before other revenues (expenses) (49 (275 67,43 (166 97 5 Other revenues (expenses): Interest on investments (444) 621 250 1,096 Donations 0 0 0 8 Miscellaneous revenues 0 388 151 7,202 Depreciation (20,932) (251,184) (583) (583) Contingency 0 0 0 0 Investment management fees 0 (346) (81) (216) Miscellaneous expenses (1,286) (3,314) 245 0 Net Total (2 (18) - 15 (253,835) -__ Income (loss) before operating transfers (71,861) (529,169) (67,457) (150,976) Operating transfers in: From Charitable Gambling Fund 0 0 0 5 Net income (loss) (71,861) (529,169) (67,457) (145,351) y Credit from transfer to contributed capital 0 0 584 584 Retained earnings - beginning (602,075) (144,767) (77,894) 0 Retained earnings - ending _ (673,936) (673, 936) _ __ X144, 767) 44,767) P:\ FINANCE \123R5W\MISC \COMMOP95.WK4 c: Mike McGuire, Dan Faust, Bruce Anderson, Tom Eastman, Council Members CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Community Center Operations Fund Statement of Sources and Applications of Cash December 31 Sources of cash: Net income (loss) Add depreciation (Increase) decrease in current assets Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue Increase (decrease) in other liabilities Total Applications of cash: Purchase of fixed assets PRELIMINARY 1995 1994 D ece m be r YTD. De YTD. $ (71,861) (529,169) (67,457) (145,351) 20 251 583 583 (22, 999) (20, 783) (5,332) (5,332) 58 50 66 238,275 ---- - __20, 267) ---- - _(2 6, 20 0) 171 310 _._ ....__ -- 841774 (35,322) (274,449) 11,318 172,949 0 0 0 0 Net increase (decrease) in cash (35,322) (274,449) 11,318 172,949 Beginning cash balance (deficit) (66,178) 172,949 161,631 0 Ending cash balance (deficit) $ (101,500) (101 17 172,949 AGENDA NO. � b AGENDA REPORT TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager FROM: Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager RE: Council /Staff Retreat DATE: January 12, 1996 INTRODUCTION Action by ou oil , Endorse Modifie e d..�..._o_.,. * .� Rejecte Date At the January 4, 1996 Council /Manager Workshop, the Council indicated a preference to hold the Council /Staff retreat on April 18 -19 (Thursday- Friday), with an alternate time of April 11 -12. STATUS Based on earlier research, Riverwood Conference Center in Monticello offered the best value (in terms of costs and facilities) among four centers surveyed. It is currently available on both dates. Three facilitators were contacted before the Council discussed the retreat in December 1995. Each of them has indicated they are available on both of these dates. One Councilmember and one staff member have indicated probable schedule conflicts if the retreat were held April 11 -12. It would be of benefit to the conference and potential facilitators if the time for the retreat can be established. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council set April 18 -19 for the Council /Staff retreat at the Riverwood Conference Center in Monticello, MN. A small number of Councilmembers may wish to meet with the City Manager and potential facilitators during the process of selecting one of them to provide services during the retreat. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Mike McGuire, City Manager Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager November 28, 1995 Council /Staff Retreat There are five staff members new to the management team during the past two years and the Council membership is set for the next two years. With a new team that will be in place for at least two years, it would be productive for the Council and staff to spend A few days in order to learn more about each other and understand what goals should be pursued. One approach used by many organizations, and one which the City has used in the past, is a two - day retreat. There are a couple of ways to structure this retreat: First half -day: Council and Manager session (no other staff present) Second &Third half -days: Council and Staff sessions MEM Three half -days: Council and Staff sessions The sessions would be led by a facilitator. Sessions could focus on: 1) Team building 2) Goalsetting and budget goals 3) Maplewood 2020 It is anticipated that these sessions would begin on a Friday morning at around 9:00 a.m. and conclude with a lunch on Saturday. The following facilities and dates are available: Daniel Gainey Center (Univ. of St. Thomas), Owatonna: Jan. 26-27 Feb. 9 -10 The Meeting Point (Univ. of St. Thomas), Chaska Feb. 9 -10 IDS Oak Ridge, Chaska Jan. 26 -27 Feb. 2 -3 Feb. 9 -10 Riverwood, Monticello Feb. 2 -3 Feb. 23-24 1996 Council /Staff Retreat Page Two Costs Costs vary on single- or double- occupancy in the rooms. Total costs for double occupancy assumes seven double rooms and two single rooms, as there are 11 men, foL11. woillell, and a facilitator for the group. Facility Unit Cost Total Cost Gainey $180 /pp single $2,880 $140 /pp double $1,340 (Sat. lunch may be addl) Meeting Point $142 /pp single + 38 /pp Sat. sess. $2,900 (no double rate) IDS Oak Ridge $I50 /pp single $3,280 $ 100 /pp double $ 1 + 55 /pp Sat. sess. Riverwood $165 /pp single $2,640 $120 /pp double $1 (incl. Sat. lunch) (due to room availability, there would need to be some double occupancy on Feb. 2 -3) Costs for a facilitator will vary, depending upon who is selected to perform this service. Initial inquiries indicate that fees may range between $2,000 and $3,000.