HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 01-23 City Council Meeting PacketThe Listening Forum begins at 6:30 p.m. before the second and fourth regularly scheduled City
Council meetings and replaces Visitor Presentations on the City Council Agenda.
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, January 23, 2012
City Hall, Council Chambers
Meeting No. 02-12
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1. Acknowledgement of Maplewood Residents Serving the Country.
C. ROLL CALL
Mayor’s Address on Protocol:
“Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council. It is our desire to keep all
discussions civil as we work through difficult issues tonight. If you are here for a Public
Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with the Policies and
Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. Before addressing
the council sign in with the City Clerk. At the podium please state your name and
address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and
Council. The Mayor will then direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond
to comments.”
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of January 9, 2012, City Council Meeting Minutes
F. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
1. Consider Reappointment to the Community Design Review Board
a. Jawaid Ahmed
2. Consider Reappointment to the Parks & Recreation Commission
a. Rhoda Erhardt
3. Consider Reappointment to Human Rights Commission
a. Arianne Maxwell
b. Marie Ridgeway
G. CONSENT AGENDA – Items on the Consent Agenda are considered routine and non-
controversial and are approved by one motion of the council. If a councilmember requests
additional information or wants to make a comment regarding an item, the vote should be held
until the questions or comments are made then the single vote should be taken. If a
councilmember objects to an item it should be removed and acted upon as a separate item.
1. Approval Of Claims
2. Approval to Accept Donation to Police Department from Schmelz Countryside
3. Approval of Assignment of Bridge Maintenance Agreement
4. Approval of 2012 Pay Equity Report
5. Approval of Temporary Gambling Permit for Church of the Presentation of the Blessed
Virgin Mary for Annual Spring Festival
6. Approval of Contract for Services Between the City of Maplewood and ISD 622
Community Educations for Aquatic Programming
7. Approval of Appraisal and Acquisition Services for TH 36/ English Street Interchange
Improvement, City Project 09-08
8. Adopt Resolution of Support for Mn/DOT Local Road Improvement Grant Funding
Application, TH 36 and English Street Interchange Improvements, City Project 09-08
9. Conditional Use Permit Review, Seasons at Maplewood (formerly known as The Regents)
Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway
10. Conditional Use Permit Review, Woodland Hills Church, 1740 Van Dyke Street
11. Planned Unit Development Review, Metro Transit Park and Ride Parking Ramp
12. Approval of Annual Service Contracts, Contractor Yearly Accumulative Expenses
13. Approval to Pay Invoice from League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for Services
Rendered
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Bartelmy-Meyer Area Street Improvements, City Project 11-14, Resolution Accepting
Feasibility Study, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications, and Calling for
Public Hearing
K. AWARD OF BIDS
L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
N. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The
request for this must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk’s Office at 651.249.2001 to
make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings
– elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be heard
and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is
understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep
emotions in check and use respectful language.
January 9, 2012
City Council Meeting Minutes 1
Item E1
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m., Monday, January 9, 2012
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 01-12
A. CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order
at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Rossbach.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
Will Rossbach, Mayor Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present
James Llanas, Councilmember Present
John Nephew, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Llanas moved to approve the agenda as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of December 5, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the December 5, 2011 City Council Meeting
Minutes as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – Mayor Rossbach, Council Members
Juenemann, Koppen, and Llanas
Abstain - Councilmember Cardinal
The motion passed.
2. Approval of December 12, 2011 City Council Workshop Minutes
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the December 12, 2011 City Council Workshop
Minutes as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – Mayor Rossbach, Council Members
Juenemann, Koppen, and Llanas
Abstain - Councilmember Cardinal
The motion passed.
Packet Page Number 1 of 138
January 9, 2012
City Council Meeting Minutes 2
3. Approval of December 12, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the December 12, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes
as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – Mayor Rossbach, Council Members
Juenemann, Koppen, and Llanas
Abstain - Councilmember Cardinal
The motion passed.
F. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
1. Administration of the Oath of Office – Marvin Koppen
City Clerk, Citizen Services Director, Karen Guilfoile administered the Oath of Office to Marvin
Koppen swearing him in as Councilmember.
2. Administration of the Oath of Office – Robert Cardinal
City Clerk, Citizen Services Director, Karen Guilfoile administered the Oath of Office to Robert
Cardinal swearing him in as Councilmember.
G. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Juenemann moved to highlight consent agenda item G2 Approval of Annual
Renewal of Club, Off-Sale, On-Sale and Wine Liquor Licenses.
Councilmember Koppen moved to highlight consent agenda item G8 Approval of 2012 Gas and
Diesel Fuel Contract with Yocum Oil.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve agenda items G1 and G3 through G10.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
1. Approval of Claims
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Approval of Claims.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 1,049,432.00 Checks # 85989 thru # 86036
dated 12/8/11 thru 12/13/11
$ 259,468.83 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 12/5/11 thru 12/9/11
$ 666,829.49 Checks # 86037 thru # 86088
dated 12/15/11 thru 12/20/11
Packet Page Number 2 of 138
January 9, 2012
City Council Meeting Minutes 3
$ 383,921.15 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 12/12/11 thru 12/16/11
$ 793,783.11 Checks # 86089 thru # 86151
dated 12/27/11
$ 805,362.15 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 12/19/11 thru 12/23/11
$ 1,046,181.12 Checks # 86152 thru # 86188
dated 1/3/12
$ 353,491.96 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 12/27/11 thru 12/30/11
$ 5,358,469.81 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL:
$ 515,063.43 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 12/9/11
$ 2,616.01 Payroll Deduction check # 9985592 thru # 9985595
dated 12/9/11
$ 518,701.49 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 12/23/11
$ 2,205.01 Payroll Deduction check # 9985644 thru # 99985647
dated 12/23/11
$ 1,038,585.94 Total Payroll
$ 6,397,055.75 GRAND TOTAL
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
2. Approval of Annual Renewal of Club, Off-Sale, On-Sale and Wine Liquor Licenses
City Clerk Guilfoile presented the staff report and answered questions of the council.
Councilmember Llanas moved to approve the Annual Renewal of Club, Off-Sale, On-Sale and
Wine Liquor Licenses.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – Mayor Rossbach, Council Members
Juenemann and Llanas
Abstain - Council Members Cardinal and
Koppen
The motion passed.
3. Approval of Currency Exchange Annual License Renewal for EZ Cash
Packet Page Number 3 of 138
January 9, 2012
City Council Meeting Minutes 4
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Currency Exchange Annual License Renewal
for EZ Cash.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
4. Authorization to Make Payment for Eden Systems Yearly Support Contract
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Payment for Eden Systems Yearly Support
Contract.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
5. Approval of 2012 Youth Service Bureau Service Agreement
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the 2012 Youth Service Bureau Service
Agreement.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
6. Approval of Resolution Directing Modification of Existing Construction Contract,
Change Order No. 4, Hills and Dales Area Street Improvement, City Project 09-15
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Resolution Directing Modification of Existing
Construction Contract, Change Order No. 4, Hills and Dales Area Street Improvement, City
Project 09-15.
RESOLUTION 11-12-669
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PROJECT 09-15
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Project 09-15, Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements, and has let a construction
contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and
designated as Improvement Project 09-15, Change Order No. 4.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that:
1. The mayor and city engineer are herby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract
by executing said Change Order No. 4 in the amount of 17,802.36.
The revised contract amount is $5,442,037.82.
Adopted by the Maplewood City Council on this 9th day of January, 2012.
Packet Page Number 4 of 138
January 9, 2012
City Council Meeting Minutes 5
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
7. Approval of Resolution Reducing Retainage on Existing Construction Contract,
Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements, City Project 09-15
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Resolution Reducing Retainage on Existing
Construction Contract, Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements, City Project 09-15.
RESOLUTION 11-12-670
DIRECTING REDUCTION OF RETAINAGE ON EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PROJECT 09-15
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has previously ordered
Improvement Project 09-15, Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements, and has let a construction
contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, the contractor, T.A. Schfisky and Sons, Inc., has requested, by written notice,
a reduction in contract retainage,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that the retainage within the construction contract is hereby authorized to be
reduced, at the discretion of the City Engineer, from 1.0% to 0.5%.
Adopted by the Maplewood City Council on this 9th day of January, 2012.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
8. Approval of 2012 Gas and Diesel Fuel Contracts with Yocum Oil
Deputy Public Works Director Thompson presented the staff report and answered questions of
the council.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the 2012 Gas and Diesel Fuel Contracts with
Yocum Oil.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
9. Approval of Designation of Depositories for Investments
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Designation of Depositories for Investments.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
Packet Page Number 5 of 138
January 9, 2012
City Council Meeting Minutes 6
10. Approval of 2011 Payment to Firefighters Pension Fund
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the 2011 Payment to Firefighters Pension Fund.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
H. PUBLIC HEARING
None
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approval of Rules and Procedures for City Council and Council Meetings
City Clerk Guilfoile presented the staff report and answered questions of the council.
Councilmember Cardinal moved to approve changes to Page 11 Other Matters to read:
The city newsletter article schedule will be divided such that the Mayor and each councilmember
has two city newsletter issues to write in a year with one of the 10 articles in one of the
Recreation Brochures.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
Councilmember Cardinal moved to approve changes to Page 11 Other Matters to read:
No political articles or ads are permitted in the Maplewood Monthly except for announcing details
of a non-partisan forum or informational meeting being held by a local, state or federal official
currently holding office.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
Discussion was held regarding implementing a Listening Forum that would be held before each
regular council meeting beginning at 6:30 p.m. The Listening Forum would take place of Visitor
Presentations on the city council agenda and would be off camera.
Councilmember Cardinal moved to approve the Listening Forum and have it recorded and
broadcast.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
Councilmember Llanas offered a friendly amendment to not broadcast the first meeting to
observe how the change goes. After discussion Councilmember Cardinal withdrew his motion.
Packet Page Number 6 of 138
January 9, 2012
City Council Meeting Minutes 7
Mayor Rossbach moved to approve the Listening Forum be conducted before regular city council
meetings on the second and fourth Mondays of the month beginning at 6:30 p.m. and to amend
the regular city council agenda removing Visitor Presentations from the agenda. The Listening
Forum will be recorded but not broadcast.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – Mayor Rossbach, Council
Members Juenemann and Llanas
Nays - Councilmember Cardinal and
Koppen
The motion passed.
Mayor Rossbach moved to approve the remainder of the changes to the Rules and Procedures
as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
2. Approval of 2012 Public Hearing Policies and Procedures
Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the 2012 Public Hearing Policies and Procedures
as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
3. Consideration of 2012 City Council Appointments
Mayor Rossbach moved to approve the 2012 City Council Appointments.
Appointment 2012 Appointments
Acting Mayor Marv Koppen
800 MHz Representative Kathleen Juenemann
James Llanas (Alternate)
Auditor Contact Bob Cardinal
Will Rossbach (Alternate)
Business & Economic Marv Koppen
Development Advisory Mike Martin (Staff Liaison)
Commission
Community Design Review Board Marv Koppen
(2nd & 4th Tuesday 7:00 p.m.) Mike Martin (Staff Liaison)
Data Compliance Officers:
Responsible Authority Karen Guilfoile
City Personnel Officer Terrie Rameaux
City Law Enforcement Officer David Thomalla
Packet Page Number 7 of 138
January 9, 2012
City Council Meeting Minutes 8
Appointment 2012 Appointments
Environment & Natural Kathleen Juenemann
Resources Commission Shann Finwall (Staff Liaison)
(1st Wednesday of the Month)
Fire Relief Association Will Rossbach
Relief By-Laws require Mayor Gayle Bauman(Staff Liaison)
to be member of the Board
Gateway Corridor Group Will Rossbach
Chuck Ahl (Alternate)
Heritage Preservation Bob Cardinal
Commission Marv Koppen (Alternate)
(3rd Thursday at 7:00 p.m.) David Fischer (Staff Liaison)
Housing & Redevelopment James Llanas
Authority Tom Ekstrand (Staff Liaison)
(2nd Wednesday at 7:00 p.m.)
Human Rights Commission James Llanas
(2nd Tuesday at 7:00 p.m.) Karen Guilfoile (Staff Liaison)
Joint Ice Arena Board Marv Koppen
James Llanas
Will Rossbach (Alternate)
Maplewood Green Team Kathleen Juenemann
(Monthly as Needed) Shann Finwall (Staff Liaison)
Municipal Legislative Commission James Antonen
(Monthly, Wed. 11:30 a.m.–1:00 p.m.) Will Rossbach (Alternate)
Official Newspaper Maplewood Review
Pioneer Press (Alternate)
Parks & Recreation Will Rossbach
Commission DuWayne Konewko
(3rd Wednesday at 7:00 p.m.) Jim Taylor/Audra Robbins (Staff Representatives)
The Partnership James Llanas
Dave Kvam (Staff Liaison)
Planning Commission Bob Cardinal
(1st & 3rd Tuesdays at 7:00 p.m.) Tom Ekstrand (Staff Liaison)
Police Civil Service Commission Kathleen Juenemann
(Meets as Needed) Terrie Rameaux (Staff Liaison)
Packet Page Number 8 of 138
January 9, 2012
City Council Meeting Minutes 9
Appointment 2012 Appointments
Ramsey County League Will Rossbach
of Local Governments Marv Koppen (Alternate)
Ramsey/Washington Kim Facile
Suburban Cable Commission Bob Cardinal (Alternate)
Marv Koppen (Alternate)
Regional Mayors Will Rossbach
Rush Line Corridor Will Rossbach
Chuck Ahl (Staff Liaison)
Suburban Area Chamber James Antonen
of Commerce Karen Guilfoile (Alternate)
Suburban Rate Authority James Llanas
(First month of quarter)
St. Paul Water Utility No Representative Required
Transportation Advisory Board Will Rossbach
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
4. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study, Rice Street Improvements,
City Project 11-28
Deputy Public Works Director Thompson presented the staff report and answered questions of
the council.
Councilmember Llanas moved to approve the Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility
Study, Rice Street Improvements, City Project 11-28.
RESOLUTION 11-12-671
ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY
WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to Rice Street generally between
County Rd B and Larpenteur Avenue, Project 11-28 and to assess the benefitting properties for
all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and it is instructed to
report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to
whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to whether it
Packet Page Number 9 of 138
January 9, 2012
City Council Meeting Minutes 10
should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the
estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $20,000 are appropriated to prepare this
feasibility report.
Approved this 9th day of January, 2012.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Diana Longrie, Maplewood
2. Bob Zick, North St. Paul
3. Mark Jenkins, Maplewood
4. Greg Copeland, St. Paul
5. Tim Kinley, Maplewood
6. Margaret Behrens, Maplewood
L. AWARD OF BIDS
None
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None
N. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
None
O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rossbach adjourned the meeting at 9:03 p.m.
Packet Page Number 10 of 138
Agenda Item F1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager
Sarah Burlingame, Senior Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Consider Reappointment to Community Design Review Board
a. Jawaid Ahmed
DATE: January 17, 2012
INTRODUCTION
Jawaid Ahmed was appointed to fill a vacancy on the Community Design Review Board on July
25, 2011. He was appointed to serve the remainder of an existing term that expires April 30,
2012. Because Jawaid has only served a short time on the commission, and he has expressed
an interest to continue serving on the commission, staff recommends that the City Council
reappointment Jawaid Ahmed to the Community Design Review Board. The term will expire to
April 30th, 2015.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council pass the attached resolution to reappoint Jawaid Ahmed to
the Community Design Review Board with a term to expire April 30th, 2015.
Attachment
1. Resolution for Appointment
Packet Page Number 11 of 138
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. ______
RESOLUTION OF APPOINTMENT
BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
Hereby appoints the following individuals, who have interviewed with the Maplewood City
Council, to serve on the following commissions:
Community Design Review Board
- Jawaid Ahmed, term expires April 30th, 2015
Packet Page Number 12 of 138
Agenda Item F2
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager
Sarah Burlingame, Senior Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Consider Reappointment to Parks & Recreation Commission
a. Rhoda Erhardt
DATE: January 17, 2012
INTRODUCTION
Rhoda Erhardt was appointed to fill a vacancy on the Parks & Recreation Commission on April
11, 2011. She was appointed to serve the remainder of an existing term that expires April 30,
2012. Because Rhoda has only served a short time on the commission, and has expressed an
interest to continue serving on the commission, staff recommends that the City Council
reappointment Rhoda Erhardt to the Parks & Recreation Commission. The term will expire to
April 30th, 2015.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council pass the attached resolution to reappoint Rhoda Erhardt to
the Parks & Recreation Commission with a term to expire April 30th, 2015.
Attachment
1. Resolution for Appointment
Packet Page Number 13 of 138
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. ______
RESOLUTION OF APPOINTMENT
BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
Hereby appoints the following individuals, who have interviewed with the Maplewood City
Council, to serve on the following commissions:
Parks & Recreation Commission
- Rhoda Erhardt, term expires April 30th, 2015
Packet Page Number 14 of 138
Agenda Item F3
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager
Sarah Burlingame, Senior Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Consider Reappointment to Human Rights Commission
a. Arianne Maxwell
b. Marie Ridgeway
DATE: January 17, 2012
INTRODUCTION
Arianne Maxwell and Marie Ridgeway were appointed to the Human Rights Commission on
November 8, 2010. Their terms expire on April 30, 2012. This was a new commission at the
time and the commissioners’ terms were staggered accordingly to prevent the terms all expiring
at once. Because Ms. Maxwell and Ms. Ridgeway have only served a short time on the
commission, and have expressed an interest to continue serving on the commission, staff
recommends that the City Council reappointment Arianne Maxwell and Marie Ridgeway to the
Human Rights Commission. The term will expire to May 1st, 2015.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council pass the attached resolution to reappoint Arianne Maxwell
and Marie Ridgeway to the Human Rights Commission a term to expire May 1st, 2015.
Attachment
1. Resolution for Appointment
Packet Page Number 15 of 138
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. ______
RESOLUTION FOR APPOINTMENT
BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
Hereby appoints the following individuals, who have interviewed with the Maplewood City
Council, to serve on the following commissions:
Parks & Recreation Commission
- Arianne Maxwell, term expires May 1st, 2015
- Marie Ridgeway, term expires May 1st, 2015
Packet Page Number 16 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
AGENDA NO.G-1
TO:City Council
FROM:Finance Manager
RE:APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE:
306,190.58$ Checks # 86190 thru # 86230
dated 1/4/12 thru 1/10/12
249,480.11$ Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 1/3/12 thru 1/6/12
229,287.62$ Checks # 86231 thru # 86280
dated 1/9/12 thru 1/17/12
499,168.88$ Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 1/9/12 thru 1/13/12
1,284,127.19$ Total Accounts Payable
575,968.67$ Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 1/6/12
2,205.01$ Payroll Deduction check # 9985679 thru # 9985682
dated 1/6/12
578,173.68$ Total Payroll
1,862,300.87$ GRAND TOTAL
sb
attachments
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651-249-2902 if you have any questions on the
attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary.
PAYROLL
AGENDA REPORT
January 23, 2012
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills
and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
Packet Page Number 17 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
Check Description Amount
86190 02464 FUNDS FOR ATMS 10,000.00
86191 04842 ZUMBA INSTRUCTION DEC - NSP 270.00
86192 00463 TRUCK REPAIR 6,618.90
00463 TRUCK REPAIR 2,577.48
86193 03789 REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS 2,012.78
86194 04265 ZUMBA INSTRUCTION - DEC 469.00
86195 01337 MESB & FLEET SUPPORT FEE - DEC 595.84
86196 01463 MCC MASSAGES DEC 1-15 1,036.00
86197 03334 WINTER PATCHING MATERIAL 243.14
86198 01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 14,581.77
01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 84.01
01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 35.69
01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 31.94
01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 13.58
86199 02347 ICC MEMBERSHIP 150.00
86200 01047 ROLL GOODS FOR SIGN FABRICATION 555.48
86201 04237 ICC MEMBERSHIP 400.00
86202 00412 EFFECTIVE MGMT TRAINING C AHL 600.00
86203 04374 AMBUTRAK LICENSE FEE 399.00
86204 00003 ESCROW REL CARDINAL HOME BLDERS 12,500.00
86205 03303 IT SUPPLIES 20.01
86206 02958 ICON SOFTWARE MAINT AGREEMENT 4,250.00
86207 04880 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 10/4 - 12/23 24.86
86208 04152 GYM SPACE FOR VOLEYBALL 786.50
86209 03978 LINENS FOR MCC DEC 10 & 11 106.88
86210 04975 NSP 5K 1,573.32
86211 00935 2011 CITY CONTRIBUTION 222,110.00
86212 04193 FORFEITED VEHICLE STORAGE FEE-DEC 2,250.00
86213 03270 YOUTH BASKETBALL OFFICIALS - DEC 672.00
86214 04974 WINTER SAFETY JACKETS 399.60
86215 04977 HP DESIGNJET T1100PS PLOTTER 1,500.00
86216 00392 UNCLAIMED PROPERTY 2006-2007 133.21
86217 04849 TEXAS HOLD'EM INSTRUCTOR - NOV 108.00
86218 01175 NET REVENUE TO COVER MAINT FIELD 2,395.00
86219 03587 EXPLORING POST RENEWAL 150.00
86220 00001 CHARITABLE GAMBLING-SECOND CHANCE 650.00
86221 00001 REIMB O FONTAINE IRRIGATION SYS 490.00
86222 04954 BELLY DANCE INSTRUCTION 11/16-12/21 120.00
86223 04976 FIRE DEPT GEAR TESTED 50.95
86224 02653 FIRE SYSTEM MAINT CONTRACT 5,886.52
86225 01836 JOINT POWER AGREEMENT OCT-DEC 2,700.00
01836 CRIME LAB SERVICES - NOV 75.00
86226 00198 WATER UTILITY 1,107.14
86227 01550 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS - DEC 4,717.40
86228 04528 ZUMBA INSTRUCTION - DEC 119.50
86229 02464 PAYING AGENT FEES 425.00
86230 03985 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 1/6 - 12/1 195.0801/10/2012 KAREN WACHAL
306,190.5841Checks in this report.
01/10/2012 SUMMIT INSPECTIONS
01/10/2012 SARA M. R. THOMPSON
01/10/2012 US BANK
01/10/2012 CITY OF ST PAUL
01/10/2012 CITY OF ST PAUL
01/10/2012 ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS
01/10/2012 BERYIMAR PEROZO
01/10/2012 SHAMROCK GEAR RESTORATION LLC
01/10/2012 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP
01/10/2012 NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL
01/10/2012 ONE TIME VENDOR
01/10/2012 ONE TIME VENDOR
01/10/2012 MN DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
01/10/2012 RICHARD NIELSEN
01/10/2012 CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL
01/10/2012 MICHAEL A. MILLER/ISN
01/10/2012 MINNESOTA GLOVE & SAFETY, INC.
01/10/2012 CITY OF MINNETONKA
01/10/2012 LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY
01/10/2012 MAPLEWOOD FIRE FIGHTERS RELIEF
01/10/2012 MIDAMERICA AUCTIONS
01/10/2012 SHEILA HEINRICH
01/10/2012 ISD 622 COMMUNITY EDUCATION
01/10/2012 KANE'S CATERING SERVICE, INC
01/10/2012 ESCROW REFUND
01/10/2012 MYCHAL FOWLDS
01/10/2012 GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC
01/10/2012 ASSOC OF MN BLDG OFFICIALS
01/10/2012 DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCIATES
01/10/2012 EMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC
01/10/2012 XCEL ENERGY
01/10/2012 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER
01/10/2012 3M
01/10/2012 XCEL ENERGY
01/10/2012 XCEL ENERGY
01/10/2012 XCEL ENERGY
01/10/2012 SISTER ROSALIND GEFRE
01/10/2012 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS CORP
01/10/2012 XCEL ENERGY
01/10/2012 MARIA PIRELA
01/10/2012 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
01/10/2012 MARY JOSEPHINE ANDERSON
01/10/2012 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
01/10/2012 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
Check Register
City of Maplewood
01/06/2012
Date Vendor
01/04/2012 US BANK
01/10/2012 MICHAEL NYE
Packet Page Number 18 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee Description Amount
12/30/2011 1/3/2012 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 27,059.75
12/30/2011 1/3/2012 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 3,362.00
12/30/2011 1/3/2012 US Bank Merchant Services Credit Card Billing fee 2,157.86
12/30/2011 1/3/2012 Optum Health DCRP & Flex plan payments 3,471.39
12/30/2011 1/4/2012 US Bank VISA One Card*Purchasing card items 785.02
1/3/2012 1/4/2012 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 44,898.18
1/4/2012 1/5/2012 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 36,322.43
1/4/2012 1/5/2012 ING - State Plan Deferred Compensation 44,784.00
12/30/2011 1/6/2012 US Bank VISA One Card*Purchasing card items 59,952.14
1/4/2012 1/6/2012 ICMA (Vantagepointe)Deferred Compensation 4,245.76
1/5/2012 1/6/2012 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 22,441.58
TOTAL 249,480.11
*Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Packet Page Number 19 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
Transaction Date Posting Date Merchant Name Transaction Amount Name
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 RED WING SHOE STORE $195.49 DAVE ADAMS
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 U OF M CCE NONCREDIT $300.00 R CHARLES AHL
12/19/2011 12/20/2011 TARGET 00011858 $28.86 MANDY ANZALDI
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 DRI*IMTOO MPEG TO DV $32.08 CHAD BERGO
12/28/2011 12/30/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $10.70 CHAD BERGO
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKLE $6.41 OAKLEY BIESANZ
12/28/2011 12/30/2011 ELPIS ENTER $515.16 OAKLEY BIESANZ
12/26/2011 12/27/2011 MENARDS 3022 $10.36 RON BOURQUIN
12/22/2011 12/26/2011 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES #229 $282.81 TROY BRINK
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1105 $11.03 SARAH BURLINGAME
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $72.65 SARAH BURLINGAME
12/21/2011 12/22/2011 REMINGTON ARMS $1,550.00 DAN BUSACK
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 STREICHER'S MPLS $999.28 DAN BUSACK
12/28/2011 12/30/2011 TIGER OAK $650.00 HEIDI CAREY
12/15/2011 12/19/2011 RED WING SHOE STORE $123.24 NICHOLAS CARVER
12/15/2011 12/19/2011 WW GRAINGER $21.71 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
12/27/2011 12/28/2011 VIKING ELECTRIC - CREDIT $369.36 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
12/20/2011 12/21/2011 SCS ENTERPRISES INC $2,590.87 KERRY CROTTY
12/15/2011 12/19/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $66.45 CHARLES DEAVER
12/28/2011 12/30/2011 RYCO SUPPLY COMPANY $256.12 CHARLES DEAVER
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 MENARDS 3022 $29.05 CHARLES DEAVER
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC.$3,370.09 RICHARD DOBLAR
12/20/2011 12/21/2011 BATTERIES PLUS #31 $263.50 RICHARD DOBLAR
12/20/2011 12/22/2011 OFFICE MAX $51.36 RICHARD DOBLAR
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 CLKBANK*COM_63H6WCEJ $39.96 RICHARD DOBLAR
12/21/2011 12/22/2011 TRANSCAT INC $340.95 MICHAEL DUGAS
12/22/2011 12/23/2011 MAGPUL INDUSTRIES $162.84 MICHAEL DUGAS
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 SKECHERS USA $68.00 MICHAEL DUGAS
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $11.75 PAUL E EVERSON
12/19/2011 12/20/2011 RSC EQUIPMENT RENTAL 322 $808.28 LARRY FARR
12/19/2011 12/20/2011 RSC EQUIPMENT RENTAL 322 $808.28 LARRY FARR
12/19/2011 12/20/2011 ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC $3,480.40 LARRY FARR
12/20/2011 12/22/2011 WEBER AND TROSETH INC $1,717.89 LARRY FARR
12/20/2011 12/22/2011 NUCO2 01 OF 01 $167.71 LARRY FARR
12/20/2011 12/22/2011 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIP-MN $4.28 LARRY FARR
12/21/2011 12/22/2011 TARGET 00006940 $3.05 LARRY FARR
12/21/2011 12/22/2011 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE SERV $3,094.97 LARRY FARR
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 MICRO CENTER #045 RETAIL $17.14 LARRY FARR
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 CINTAS #470 $95.98 LARRY FARR
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 CINTAS #470 $44.11 LARRY FARR
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 CINTAS #470 $84.96 LARRY FARR
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 ALS VACUUM&JANITORIAL SUP $178.96 LARRY FARR
12/26/2011 12/27/2011 BEST BUY MHT 00000158 $53.57 LARRY FARR
12/26/2011 12/28/2011 STAPLES 00118836 $139.80 LARRY FARR
12/27/2011 12/29/2011 STAPLES 00118836 ($139.80)LARRY FARR
12/28/2011 12/30/2011 BRADLEY PLUMBING $679.00 LARRY FARR
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY ($167.90)LARRY FARR
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 RSC EQUIPMENT RENTAL 320 $112.48 LARRY FARR
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 AQUA LOGICS INC $49.19 LARRY FARR
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY $32.32 LARRY FARR
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 MENARDS 3059 $275.05 LARRY FARR
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 SIMPLEX GRINNELL WEB P $226.14 LARRY FARR
12/18/2011 12/19/2011 FEDEX 898715887544 $26.16 SHANN FINWALL
12/22/2011 12/22/2011 COMCAST CABLE COMM $54.00 MYCHAL FOWLDS
12/27/2011 12/28/2011 CABLING SERVICES $427.80 MYCHAL FOWLDS
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTION $402.42 MYCHAL FOWLDS
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTION $559.75 MYCHAL FOWLDS
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTION $1,162.13 MYCHAL FOWLDS
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTION $69.41 MYCHAL FOWLDS
12/22/2011 12/22/2011 AMAZON.COM $3,758.64 NICK FRANZEN
12/22/2011 12/23/2011 PITNEY BOWES TELEMRKTG $113.01 NICK FRANZEN
12/22/2011 12/23/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $5.00 NICK FRANZEN
Packet Page Number 20 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
12/15/2011 12/19/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $153.57 DAVID GERMAIN
12/20/2011 12/22/2011 MILLS FLEET FARM #2,700 $17.67 DAVID GERMAIN
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 RED WING SHOE STORE $195.49 DAVID GERMAIN
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $202.73 CAROLE GERNES
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKLE $18.19 CLARENCE GERVAIS
12/21/2011 12/22/2011 IIMC $175.00 KAREN GUILFOILE
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 MENARDS 3022 $111.66 MARK HAAG
12/22/2011 12/26/2011 MILLS FLEET FARM #1,400 $253.18 MILES HAMRE
12/22/2011 12/26/2011 MILLS FLEET FARM #2,700 $9.99 MILES HAMRE
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 MENARDS 3022 $3.99 GARY HINNENKAMP
12/08/2011 12/19/2011 AMERICAN RED CROSS TWIN C $51.00 RON HORWATH
12/21/2011 12/23/2011 OFFICE MAX $32.43 RON HORWATH
12/28/2011 12/29/2011 LL BEAN MAILORDER $599.50 ANN HUTCHINSON
12/19/2011 12/21/2011 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $584.73 DAVID JAHN
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 IDU*PUBLIC SECTOR $48.71 JASON KREGER
12/23/2011 12/28/2011 AOAMEDIA.COM*AVANGATE.$29.95 JASON KREGER
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 VALLEY TROPHY $18.65 NICHOLAS KREKELER
12/21/2011 12/23/2011 A1 LAUNDRY $23.53 NICHOLAS KREKELER
12/27/2011 12/28/2011 THE UPS STORE 2171 $18.79 NICHOLAS KREKELER
12/15/2011 12/19/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $3.74 DAVID KVAM
12/20/2011 12/21/2011 AMZ*OPTICSPLANET, INC.$1,309.00 DAVID KVAM
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 DON'S PAINT & COLLISION $1,073.31 DAVID KVAM
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 CLASSIC COLLISION CTR $802.29 DAVID KVAM
12/15/2011 12/19/2011 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL $151.36 STEVE LUKIN
12/15/2011 12/19/2011 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL $159.68 STEVE LUKIN
12/19/2011 12/20/2011 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE $37.10 STEVE LUKIN
12/27/2011 12/29/2011 BARNETT CHRYJEEPKIA $2.14 STEVE LUKIN
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT $2,147.38 STEVE LUKIN
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT $466.78 STEVE LUKIN
12/26/2011 12/27/2011 HUGO'S TREE CARE $2,992.50 MARK MARUSKA
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 ADVANTAGE SIGNS AND $353.49 BRENT MEISSNER
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $512.00 MICHAEL MONDOR
12/19/2011 12/21/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $62.88 MICHAEL MONDOR
12/22/2011 12/26/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $62.88 MICHAEL MONDOR
12/22/2011 12/26/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $461.88 MICHAEL MONDOR
12/28/2011 12/30/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $181.08 MICHAEL MONDOR
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY $290.00 MICHAEL MONDOR
12/17/2011 12/21/2011 OPTICS PLANET INC $234.99 MICHAEL NYE
12/19/2011 12/20/2011 RADIOSHACK COR00161455 $84.51 MICHAEL NYE
12/19/2011 12/20/2011 BATTERIES PLUS #31 $27.75 MICHAEL NYE
12/19/2011 12/21/2011 PELICAN CASE $17.55 MICHAEL NYE
12/19/2011 12/21/2011 PELICAN CASE $108.96 MICHAEL NYE
12/21/2011 12/26/2011 RECONYX INC.$904.92 MICHAEL NYE
12/28/2011 12/30/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $47.07 MICHAEL NYE
12/28/2011 12/30/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $14.42 MICHAEL NYE
12/20/2011 12/21/2011 TRACTOR-SUPPLY-CO #0199 $142.71 ERICK OSWALD
12/15/2011 12/19/2011 DIRECTLY YOURS $13.94 MARY KAY PALANK
12/19/2011 12/20/2011 PARTY CITY 1032 $31.45 MARY KAY PALANK
12/28/2011 12/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $180.31 MARY KAY PALANK
12/19/2011 12/20/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $4.11 PHILIP F POWELL
12/20/2011 12/21/2011 AMAZON.COM $32.99 PHILIP F POWELL
12/20/2011 12/21/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $854.00 PHILIP F POWELL
12/20/2011 12/21/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $9.60 PHILIP F POWELL
12/21/2011 12/21/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $35.42 PHILIP F POWELL
12/22/2011 12/23/2011 USPS 26834500133401316 $29.35 PHILIP F POWELL
12/22/2011 12/23/2011 SITBETTER.COM $1,374.00 PHILIP F POWELL
12/22/2011 12/26/2011 TRI-TECH FORENSICS INC $120.50 PHILIP F POWELL
12/15/2011 12/19/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $355.03 STEVEN PRIEM
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $60.77 STEVEN PRIEM
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 GOODYEAR AUTO SRV CT 6920 $52.00 STEVEN PRIEM
12/19/2011 12/20/2011 BOYER TRUCK PARTS $271.50 STEVEN PRIEM
12/19/2011 12/21/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $219.63 STEVEN PRIEM
12/20/2011 12/21/2011 FACTORY MTR PTS #1 $70.66 STEVEN PRIEM
Packet Page Number 21 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
12/20/2011 12/21/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $105.28 STEVEN PRIEM
12/21/2011 12/23/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $110.33 STEVEN PRIEM
12/22/2011 12/23/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $141.99 STEVEN PRIEM
12/22/2011 12/23/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $266.12 STEVEN PRIEM
12/22/2011 12/23/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $230.74 STEVEN PRIEM
12/27/2011 12/28/2011 FORCE AMERICA DISTRIB LLC $152.83 STEVEN PRIEM
12/27/2011 12/29/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $124.97 STEVEN PRIEM
12/28/2011 12/29/2011 MTI $31.13 STEVEN PRIEM
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 POMPS TIRE SERVICE, INC $573.76 STEVEN PRIEM
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 NOVACARE REHB/HEALT $250.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX
12/27/2011 12/29/2011 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HE $173.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX
12/19/2011 12/20/2011 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS $1,032.96 MICHAEL REILLY
12/22/2011 12/23/2011 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS $141.75 MICHAEL REILLY
12/22/2011 12/28/2011 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $629.55 MICHAEL REILLY
12/27/2011 12/28/2011 WONDER HOSTESS # 50080 $26.26 AUDRA ROBBINS
12/27/2011 12/29/2011 MALL OF AMERICA $214.95 AUDRA ROBBINS
12/28/2011 12/29/2011 CUB FOODS, INC.$19.96 AUDRA ROBBINS
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $55.08 DEB SCHMIDT
12/27/2011 12/28/2011 NADA APPRAISAL GUIDES $172.00 DEB SCHMIDT
12/28/2011 12/29/2011 POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY $355.00 SCOTT SCHULTZ
12/29/2011 12/30/2011 POMPS TIRE SERVICE, INC $786.72 SCOTT SCHULTZ
12/19/2011 12/21/2011 IACIS $50.00 MICHAEL SHORTREED
12/20/2011 12/21/2011 TRAINING $322.37 MICHAEL SHORTREED
12/20/2011 12/22/2011 DRI*WWW.ELEMENT5.INFO $92.13 MICHAEL SHORTREED
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 STREICHER'S MO $3,923.20 MICHAEL SHORTREED
12/22/2011 12/26/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $209.41 DAVID THOMALLA
12/27/2011 12/29/2011 RUN N FUN $70.00 DAVID THOMALLA
$59,952.14
Packet Page Number 22 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
Transaction Date Posting Date Merchant Name Transaction Amount Name
12/15/2011 12/19/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $11.40 LONN BAKKE
12/15/2011 12/19/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $42.60 JOSEPH DEMULLING
12/17/2011 12/19/2011 WWW.KOHLS.COM #0873 $106.43 VIRGINIA ERICKSON
12/22/2011 12/23/2011 THE SALVATION ARMY 11 $23.00 ALESIA METRY
12/23/2011 12/26/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $453.14 MATTHEW RHUDE
12/16/2011 12/19/2011 WWW.KOHLS.COM #0873 $89.97 JOSEPH STEINER
12/22/2011 12/23/2011 OPTICS PLANET INC $58.48 THOMAS SZCZEPANSKI
$785.02
Packet Page Number 23 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
Check Description Amount
86231 02464 FUNDS FOR ATMS 20,000.00
86232 00644 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JANUARY 12,059.04
86233 01126 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JANUARY 496.00
86234 03818 MONTHLY PREMIUM - PARTIAL JAN 13,250.36
86235 04848 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JANUARY 245.40
86236 04222 2011 DURANGO (FIRE DEPT)27,275.00
86237 01936 REIMB FOR INTERNET - DEC 65.46
86238 00240 APPLICANT BACKGROUND CHECKS 65.22
86239 02396 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 10/14-12/15 59.94
86240 00585 NET BILLABLE TICKETS - DEC 232.20
86241 02728 PROJ 09-08 PROF SRVS THRU 11/30 19,386.32
02728 PROJ 11-14 PROF SRVS THRU 11/30 18,089.39
86242 00393 MONTHLY SURTAX - DEC 13213123035 1,919.40
86243 01202 CITY NEWS - JANUARY 4,801.17
86244 01337 911 DISPATCH SRVS - DEC 24,088.75
01337 MESB & FLEET SUPPORT FEE - DEC 654.08
86245 04845 RECYCLING - DEC 27,499.50
86246 04192 EMS BILLING - DEC 3,495.00
86247 00111 ANIMAL CONTROL SRVS 12/19 - 01/08 2,714.09
86248 00134 MEMBERSHIP DUES 10,225.00
86249 04471 SOUND TECH & GEAR FOR MCC 1/27 600.00
86250 04549 ZUMBA INSTRUCTION - DEC 240.50
86251 02929 LTC MONTHLY PREMIUM - JANUARY 479.54
86252 04440 10% OF VEHICLE FORFEITURE 115.71
86253 04867 PROF SRVS THRU 12/31 2,125.30
86254 00561 REPLACEMENT PUMP LIFT STATION 10 6,783.75
86255 04846 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 3,407.90
86256 03597 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 12/6 - 1/3 13.60
86257 00846 PHONE INTERPRETATION SRVS 9.29
86258 00857 LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE-B CARDINAL 220.00
86259 02336 FITNESS CONSULTANT SRVS 4TH QTR 1,500.00
86260 04000 TRAINING 165.00
86261 01085 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JANUARY 2,714.05
86262 01115 ANNUAL DUES 9,504.50
86263 04407 PERFORMANCES MCC JAN 6 & 7 3,933.00
86264 00001 REIMB J AREND DRIVEWAY PROG 250.70
86265 00001 REFUND C MORRISETTE S SNEAKERS 154.63
86266 00001 REFUND S DANNA BCBS BENEFIT 40.00
86267 00001 REFUND R HAMPER HP BENEFIT 40.00
86268 00001 REFUND G WESSELS HP BENEFIT 40.00
86269 00001 REFUND R HOOK BCBS BENEFIT 20.00
86270 00001 REFUND W HUBBARD MEDICA BENEFIT 20.00
86271 04978 WEDDING EXPO MEDIA & INSERTS 653.00
86272 00396 TRANSFER TITLES FORFEITED VEHICLES 215.00
86273 02358 REFUND DUPLICATE PAYMENT 320.00
86274 02010 20% OF VEHICLE FORFEITURE 231.41
02010 30% OF VEHICLE FORFEITURE 187.11
02010 30% OF VEHICLE FORFEITURE 160.43
02010 30% OF VEHICLE FORFEITURE 36.08
02010 30% OF VEHICLE FORFEITURE 19.56
86275 03446 DEER REMOVAL - DEC 115.00
86276 01455 REIMB FOR NOTARY PUBLIC CO REG 20.00
86277 00198 WATER UTILITY 748.13
Check Register
City of Maplewood
01/13/2012
Date Vendor
01/10/2012 US BANK
01/09/2012 AVESIS
01/09/2012 SYNERGY MOTOR CAR COMPANY
01/17/2012 CHAD BERGO
01/09/2012 HEALTHPARTNERS
01/09/2012 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE
01/09/2012 MEDICA
01/17/2012 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
01/17/2012 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
01/17/2012 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
01/17/2012 C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES
01/17/2012 SHANN FINWALL
01/17/2012 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL
01/17/2012 TENNIS SANITATION LLC
01/17/2012 TRANS-MEDIC
01/17/2012 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
01/17/2012 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC
01/17/2012 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
01/17/2012 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
01/17/2012 CNAGLAC
01/17/2012 PAT FLEMING
01/17/2012 FOTH INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIR
01/17/2012 ASSN OF METRO MUNICIPALITIES
01/17/2012 B&B AVM INC.
01/17/2012 JAN ALICE CAMPBELL
01/17/2012 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
01/17/2012 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
01/17/2012 M A TAYLOR INC
01/17/2012 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE
01/17/2012 HEALTHEAST
01/17/2012 MARY JO HOFMEISTER
01/17/2012 KERI NOBLE
01/17/2012 ONE TIME VENDOR
01/17/2012 ONE TIME VENDOR
01/17/2012 MN JUVENILE OFFICERS
01/17/2012 MN LIFE INSURANCE
01/17/2012 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMM
01/17/2012 ONE TIME VENDOR
01/17/2012 ONE TIME VENDOR
01/17/2012 PRESS PUBLICATIONS
01/17/2012 ONE TIME VENDOR
01/17/2012 ONE TIME VENDOR
01/17/2012 ONE TIME VENDOR
01/17/2012 RAMSEY CTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
01/17/2012 RAMSEY CTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
01/17/2012 RAMSEY CTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
01/17/2012 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
01/17/2012 RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF
01/17/2012 RAMSEY CTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
01/17/2012 ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS
01/17/2012 RAMSEY CTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
01/17/2012 RICK JOHNSON DEER & BEAVER INC
01/17/2012 MICHAEL SHORTREED
Packet Page Number 24 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
86278 02069 TELEVISED AND CLEANED MAIN LINE 420.00
86279 00529 LTD PLAN 4043120-2 - JANUARY 4,291.18
00529 STD PLAN 4043120-1 - JANUARY 2,371.93
86280 04179 PROGRAM DISPLAY SIGN MCC - NOV 250.00
04179 PROGRAM DISPLAY SIGN MCC - DEC 250.00
01/17/2012 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
01/17/2012 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO
229,287.6250Checks in this report.
01/17/2012 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO
01/17/2012 VISUAL IMAGE PROMOTIONS
01/17/2012 VISUAL IMAGE PROMOTIONS
Packet Page Number 25 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee Description Amount
1/5/2012 1/9/2012 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 98,097.43
1/5/2012 1/9/2012 P.E.R.A.P.E.R.A.87,971.24
1/5/2012 1/9/2012 ICMA (Vantagepointe)Retiree Health Savings 40,028.41
1/6/2012 1/9/2012 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 36,125.03
1/6/2012 1/9/2012 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 2,251.50
1/5/2012 1/10/2012 MidAmerica - ING HRA Flex plan 20,054.30
1/5/2012 1/10/2012 Labor Unions Union Dues 1,843.00
1/9/2012 1/10/2012 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 66,268.32
1/5/2012 1/11/2012 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 20,730.35
1/10/2012 1/11/2012 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 37,806.91
1/11/2012 1/12/2012 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 45,640.67
1/5/2012 1/13/2012 Optum Health DCRP & Flex plan payments 5,351.96
1/12/2012 1/13/2012 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 30,017.76
1/12/2012 1/13/2012 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 1,401.00
1/12/2012 1/13/2012 MN Dept of Revenue MN Care Tax 5,581.00
TOTAL 499,168.88
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Packet Page Number 26 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
CHECK #CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
01/06/12 ABEL, CLINT 2,842.94
01/06/12 THOMALLA, DAVID 4,936.26
01/06/12 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,882.15
01/06/12 POWELL, PHILIP 2,903.66
01/06/12 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 2,081.79
01/06/12 KVAM, DAVID 4,188.29
01/06/12 PALANK, MARY 1,886.77
01/06/12 WEAVER, KRISTINE 2,288.55
01/06/12 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,882.15
01/06/12 RICHTER, CHARLENE 1,007.89
01/06/12 SCHOENECKER, LEIGH 1,554.15
01/06/12 MOY, PAMELA 1,496.50
01/06/12 OSTER, ANDREA 1,886.77
01/06/12 LARSON, MICHELLE 1,798.29
01/06/12 MECHELKE, SHERRIE 1,312.90
01/06/12 THOMFORDE, FAITH 670.50
01/06/12 CORTESI, LUANNE 1,066.28
01/06/12 SCHMIDT, DEBORAH 2,719.20
01/06/12 SPANGLER, EDNA 1,174.29
01/06/12 GUILFOILE, KAREN 4,376.43
01/06/12 NEPHEW, MICHELLE 1,459.87
01/06/12 ARNOLD, AJLA 1,551.69
01/06/12 CAREY, HEIDI 4,226.02
01/06/12 KELSEY, CONNIE 2,569.24
01/06/12 RUEB, JOSEPH 2,617.00
01/06/12 DEBILZAN, JUDY 1,270.59
01/06/12 JACKSON, MARY 2,171.28
01/06/12 URBANSKI, HOLLY 500.00
01/06/12 ANDERSON, CAROLE 1,883.04
01/06/12 RAMEAUX, THERESE 3,030.67
01/06/12 BAUMAN, GAYLE 4,214.97
01/06/12 FARR, LARRY 3,030.67
01/06/12 JAHN, DAVID 2,265.46
01/06/12 KANTRUD, HUGH 184.62
01/06/12 CHRISTENSON, SCOTT 2,126.11
01/06/12 ANTONEN, JAMES 5,800.00
01/06/12 BURLINGAME, SARAH 1,966.90
01/06/12 VALLE, EDWARD 102.50
01/06/12 AHL, R. CHARLES 5,358.72
01/06/12 LLANAS, JAMES 435.16
01/06/12 ROSSBACH, WILLIAM 494.44
01/06/12 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 435.16
01/06/12 KOPPEN, MARVIN 435.16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
AMOUNT
01/06/12 CARDINAL, ROBERT 435.16
Packet Page Number 27 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
01/06/12 BECK, YANCEY 126.00
01/06/12 BIGELBACH, ANTHONY 384.00
01/06/12 BAHL, DAVID 168.00
01/06/12 BAUMAN, ANDREW 2,844.11
01/06/12 XIONG, KAO 3,031.03
01/06/12 ANDERSON, BRIAN 384.00
01/06/12 TRAN, JOSEPH 3,001.43
01/06/12 WENZEL, JAY 3,155.54
01/06/12 THEISEN, PAUL 3,278.48
01/06/12 THIENES, PAUL 3,561.52
01/06/12 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 3,335.86
01/06/12 TAUZELL, BRIAN 2,717.11
01/06/12 STEINER, JOSEPH 3,452.68
01/06/12 SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM 3,161.64
01/06/12 RHUDE, MATTHEW 2,956.20
01/06/12 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 4,060.51
01/06/12 PARKER, JAMES 2,400.55
01/06/12 REZNY, BRADLEY 3,591.11
01/06/12 NYE, MICHAEL 3,433.27
01/06/12 OLSON, JULIE 2,901.07
01/06/12 MCCARTY, GLEN 3,542.47
01/06/12 METRY, ALESIA 3,001.43
01/06/12 MARINO, JASON 3,105.14
01/06/12 MARTIN, JERROLD 3,073.92
01/06/12 LU, JOHNNIE 2,987.33
01/06/12 LYNCH, KATHERINE 2,311.25
01/06/12 LANGNER, SCOTT 2,842.94
01/06/12 LANGNER, TODD 2,943.49
01/06/12 KREKELER, NICHOLAS 842.40
01/06/12 KROLL, BRETT 2,987.33
01/06/12 KALKA, THOMAS 913.08
01/06/12 KONG, TOMMY 3,017.74
01/06/12 HIEBERT, STEVEN 2,954.18
01/06/12 JOHNSON, KEVIN 4,124.89
01/06/12 HAWKINSON JR, TIMOTHY 3,161.64
01/06/12 HER, PHENG 2,687.63
01/06/12 FRITZE, DEREK 3,324.28
01/06/12 GABRIEL, ANTHONY 3,195.88
01/06/12 FORSYTHE, MARCUS 2,010.73
01/06/12 FRASER, JOHN 3,477.42
01/06/12 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 3,112.67
01/06/12 FLOR, TIMOTHY 1,874.41
01/06/12 DOBLAR, RICHARD 3,886.81
01/06/12 DUGAS, MICHAEL 4,028.17
01/06/12 CROTTY, KERRY 3,575.20
01/06/12 DEMULLING, JOSEPH 3,097.61
01/06/12 BUSACK, DANIEL 3,998.04
01/06/12 COFFEY, KEVIN 3,314.90
01/06/12 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 3,946.09
01/06/12 BOHL, JOHN 3,141.42
01/06/12 BELDE, STANLEY 2,954.18
01/06/12 BENJAMIN, MARKESE 2,952.09
01/06/12 BAKKE, LONN 3,102.01
01/06/12 BARTZ, PAUL 3,457.36
01/06/12 ALDRIDGE, MARK 2,954.18
Packet Page Number 28 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
01/06/12 LUKIN, STEVEN 4,475.33
01/06/12 WESSELS, TIMOTHY 456.00
01/06/12 GERVAIS-JR, CLARENCE 3,867.86
01/06/12 STREFF, MICHAEL 3,246.95
01/06/12 SVENDSEN, RONALD 3,714.94
01/06/12 SCHULTZ, JEROME 408.00
01/06/12 SEDLACEK, JEFFREY 2,924.74
01/06/12 RICE, CHRISTOPHER 766.00
01/06/12 RODRIGUEZ, ROBERTO 432.00
01/06/12 RANK, PAUL 288.00
01/06/12 RAVENWALD, CORINNE 168.00
01/06/12 RAINEY, JAMES 468.00
01/06/12 RANK, NATHAN 576.00
01/06/12 PLACE, ANDREA 2,553.32
01/06/12 POWERS, KENNETH 612.00
01/06/12 PETERSON, MARK 364.00
01/06/12 PETERSON, ROBERT 3,092.09
01/06/12 OPHEIM, JOHN 420.00
01/06/12 PACHECO, ALPHONSE 576.00
01/06/12 NOWICKI, PAUL 279.00
01/06/12 OLSON, JAMES 2,844.11
01/06/12 NIELSEN, KENNETH 240.00
01/06/12 NOVAK, JEROME 3,840.24
01/06/12 MONSON, PETER 72.00
01/06/12 MORGAN, JEFFERY 312.00
01/06/12 MILLER, NICHOLAS 144.00
01/06/12 MONDOR, MICHAEL 3,089.18
01/06/12 MELLEN, RICHARD 300.00
01/06/12 MILLER, LADD 336.00
01/06/12 LOCHEN, MICHAEL 336.00
01/06/12 MELLEN, CHRISTOPHER 366.00
01/06/12 KUBAT, ERIC 2,449.48
01/06/12 LINDER, TIMOTHY 3,165.09
01/06/12 KERSKA, JOSEPH 384.00
01/06/12 KONDER, RONALD 153.00
01/06/12 KANE, ROBERT 684.00
01/06/12 KARRAS, JAMIE 144.00
01/06/12 JOHNSON, JAMES 441.00
01/06/12 JONES, JONATHAN 240.00
01/06/12 HUTCHINSON, JAMES 516.00
01/06/12 IMM, TRACY 360.00
01/06/12 HAWTHORNE, ROCHELLE 288.00
01/06/12 HENDRICKSON, NICHOLAS 2,470.98
01/06/12 HALE, JOSEPH 336.00
01/06/12 HALWEG, JODI 2,648.38
01/06/12 FOSSUM, ANDREW 2,844.11
01/06/12 HAGEN, MICHAEL 732.00
01/06/12 EATON, PAUL 240.00
01/06/12 EVERSON, PAUL 3,266.71
01/06/12 CRAWFORD, RAYMOND 729.00
01/06/12 DAWSON, RICHARD 3,943.89
01/06/12 CAPISTRANT, JACOB 387.00
01/06/12 CAPISTRANT, JOHN 420.00
01/06/12 BOURQUIN, RON 336.00
01/06/12 BRADBURY, RYAN 600.00
Packet Page Number 29 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
01/06/12 BETHEL III, CHARLES 42.50
01/06/12 BJORK, BRANDON 409.75
01/06/12 ALLEN, KATELYN 35.00
01/06/12 BERGER, STEPHANIE 591.38
01/06/12 SWAN, DAVID 2,738.95
01/06/12 WELLENS, MOLLY 1,644.36
01/06/12 CARVER, NICHOLAS 3,211.95
01/06/12 FISHER, DAVID 3,778.99
01/06/12 MARTIN, MICHAEL 1,496.39
01/06/12 BRASH, JASON 2,259.75
01/06/12 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 3,800.52
01/06/12 FINWALL, SHANN 3,202.15
01/06/12 SINDT, ANDREA 2,013.80
01/06/12 THOMPSON, DEBRA 821.72
01/06/12 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 3,211.95
01/06/12 KROLL, LISA 1,882.15
01/06/12 SOUTTER, CHRISTINE 74.81
01/06/12 WACHAL, KAREN 964.68
01/06/12 HAYMAN, JANET 1,492.87
01/06/12 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,622.80
01/06/12 DEAVER, CHARLES 453.95
01/06/12 GERNES, CAROLE 712.69
01/06/12 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 2,127.67
01/06/12 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 1,520.05
01/06/12 MARUSKA, MARK 43,118.81
01/06/12 NAUGHTON, JOHN 2,125.35
01/06/12 HAMRE, MILES 1,499.21
01/06/12 HINNENKAMP, GARY 2,246.86
01/06/12 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 4,590.46
01/06/12 EDSON, DAVID 2,309.40
01/06/12 ZIEMAN, SCOTT 582.20
01/06/12 JANASZAK, MEGHAN 1,482.95
01/06/12 LOVE, STEVEN 3,281.18
01/06/12 THOMPSON, MICHAEL 4,228.26
01/06/12 KUMMER, STEVEN 3,123.75
01/06/12 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,713.97
01/06/12 JACOBSON, SCOTT 2,530.95
01/06/12 JAROSCH, JONATHAN 2,843.75
01/06/12 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,713.98
01/06/12 ENGSTROM, ANDREW 2,530.95
01/06/12 TEVLIN, TODD 2,144.86
01/06/12 BURLINGAME, NATHAN 2,006.40
01/06/12 OSWALD, ERICK 2,918.26
01/06/12 RUNNING, ROBERT 2,458.77
01/06/12 MEISSNER, BRENT 1,947.83
01/06/12 NAGEL, BRYAN 3,408.40
01/06/12 EDGE, DOUGLAS 2,104.20
01/06/12 JONES, DONALD 2,144.86
01/06/12 BUCKLEY, BRENT 2,566.46
01/06/12 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 2,144.86
01/06/12 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 21,823.03
01/06/12 BRINK, TROY 2,354.81
01/06/12 KNUTSON, LOIS 2,034.95
01/06/12 NIVEN, AMY 1,411.62
01/06/12 ZWIEG, SUSAN 729.34
Packet Page Number 30 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
01/06/12 FOX, KELLY 45.00
01/06/12 FLUEGEL, LARISSA 56.63
01/06/12 FONTAINE, KIM 584.94
01/06/12 FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA 49.94
01/06/12 FLACKEY, MAUREEN 93.00
01/06/12 EKSTRAND, DANIEL 108.41
01/06/12 ERICKSON-CLARK, CAROL 49.00
01/06/12 DIONNE, DANIELLE 136.88
01/06/12 DUNN, RYAN 1,015.38
01/06/12 CRANDALL, KRISTA 177.82
01/06/12 DEMPSEY, BETH 202.00
01/06/12 BUTLER, ANGELA 85.00
01/06/12 CLARK, PAMELA 19.30
01/06/12 BRUSOE, CRISTINA 33.90
01/06/12 BUCKLEY, BRITTANY 272.15
01/06/12 BIGGS, ANNETTE 93.49
01/06/12 BRUSOE, AMY 248.55
01/06/12 BAUDE, SARAH 36.50
01/06/12 BEITLER, JULIE 37.10
01/06/12 ANDERSON, MAXWELL 296.80
01/06/12 BAETZOLD, SETH 32.63
01/06/12 VUE, LOR PAO 361.25
01/06/12 AICHELE, MEGAN 111.20
01/06/12 PENN, CHRISTINE 2,309.67
01/06/12 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 687.44
01/06/12 KULHANEK-DIONNE, ANN 433.76
01/06/12 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 526.97
01/06/12 HOFMEISTER, MARY 1,060.91
01/06/12 HOFMEISTER, TIMOTHY 370.50
01/06/12 GLASS, JEAN 2,103.67
01/06/12 HER, PETER 345.13
01/06/12 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND 431.38
01/06/12 EVANS, CHRISTINE 1,308.02
01/06/12 ANZALDI, MANDY 1,452.88
01/06/12 BRENEMAN, NEIL 1,603.71
01/06/12 HAAG, MARK 1,585.88
01/06/12 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 3,060.34
01/06/12 ADAMS, DAVID 1,606.32
01/06/12 GERMAIN, DAVID 2,134.60
01/06/12 TAYLOR, JAMES 2,711.78
01/06/12 VUKICH, CANDACE 33.75
01/06/12 SCHRANKLER, SAM 36.25
01/06/12 ST MARTIN, ANDREW 64.00
01/06/12 SCHALLER, SCOTT 53.75
01/06/12 SCHALLER, TYLER 50.75
01/06/12 ROBBINS, AUDRA 2,847.74
01/06/12 ROBBINS, CAMDEN 36.00
01/06/12 KLEIN, TIM 80.00
01/06/12 KOHLMAN, JENNIFER 57.00
01/06/12 KHOURY, SARAH 539.00
01/06/12 KLEIN, AARON 72.00
01/06/12 DWELLY, KATHLEEN 45.00
01/06/12 GRUENHAGEN, JAYNE 7.25
01/06/12 BRISENO, EMILIO 64.00
01/06/12 DEBILZAN, JAIME 39.00
Packet Page Number 31 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
01/06/12 MALONEY, SHAUNA 157.50
01/06/12 PRINS, KELLY 1,255.62
01/06/12 JOHNSON, JUSTIN 165.00
01/06/12 LONETTI, JAMES 360.00
01/06/12 COLEMAN, PATRICK 268.13
01/06/12 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,320.90
01/06/12 PENN, CAYLA 126.00
01/06/12 BORCHERT, JONATHAN 195.75
01/06/12 DANIEL, BREANNA 20.25
01/06/12 HITE, ANDREA 90.00
01/06/12 WOLFGRAM, TERESA 72.00
01/06/12 BOSLEY, CAROL 85.00
01/06/12 WEDES, CARYL 74.25
01/06/12 WOLFGRAM, MARY 81.90
01/06/12 TUPY, MARCUS 285.00
01/06/12 WARNER, CAROLYN 264.00
01/06/12 TREPANIER, TODD 484.00
01/06/12 TUPY, HEIDE 91.60
01/06/12 SMITH, CASEY 99.23
01/06/12 SMITLEY, SHARON 362.60
01/06/12 SCHREINER, MARK 18.25
01/06/12 SMITH, ANN 142.10
01/06/12 SCHMIDT, EMILY 27.63
01/06/12 SCHREIER, ROSEMARIE 185.00
01/06/12 RONNING, ISAIAH 111.65
01/06/12 RONNING, ZACCEUS 21.90
01/06/12 RESENDIZ, LORI 2,129.22
01/06/12 RICHTER, DANIEL 75.60
01/06/12 PROESCH, ANDY 523.25
01/06/12 RANEY, COURTNEY 245.00
01/06/12 PEHOSKI, JOEL 32.50
01/06/12 POVLITZKI, MARINA 19.00
01/06/12 NELSON, ELEONOR 25.00
01/06/12 NORTHOUSE, KATHERINE 95.63
01/06/12 NADEAU, KELLY 128.98
01/06/12 NADEAU, TAYLOR 102.20
01/06/12 MCCANN, NATALIE 57.00
01/06/12 MCCORMACK, MELISSA 55.13
01/06/12 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 565.32
01/06/12 LAMSON, ELIANA 72.00
01/06/12 KOHLER, ROCHELLE 90.00
01/06/12 KOLLER, NINA 449.38
01/06/12 JOYER, ANTHONY 37.00
01/06/12 JOYER, JENNA 101.91
01/06/12 JOHNSON, BARBARA 86.60
01/06/12 JOHNSON, JAMES 139.00
01/06/12 HORWATH, RONALD 2,589.01
01/06/12 IVES, RANDY 40.00
01/06/12 HEINRICH, SHEILA 530.00
01/06/12 HOLMBERG, LADONNA 501.00
01/06/12 HAGSTROM, EMILY 70.35
01/06/12 HANSEN, HANNAH 283.95
01/06/12 GRAY, MEGAN 114.58
01/06/12 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 254.00
01/06/12 GIPPLE, TRISHA 201.41
Packet Page Number 32 of 138
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2012\AprClms - 1-6-12 and 1-13-12
9985661
9985662
9985663
9985664
9985665
9985666
9985667
9985668
9985669
9985670
9985671
9985672
9985673
9985674
9985675
9985676
9985677
9985678 01/06/12 STEFFEN, MICHAEL 87.00
575,968.67
01/06/12 BELMARES, GABRIEL 137.75
01/06/12 REMNYAKOVA, ANZHELIKA 43.50
01/06/12 WALES, ABIGAIL 76.13
01/06/12 WEINHAGEN, SHELBY 33.08
01/06/12 LEKO, LINDSAY 48.50
01/06/12 SCOTT, HALEY 22.05
01/06/12 MERRITT, JACOB 64.00
01/06/12 VANG, TIM 377.00
01/06/12 MASON, KYLE 40.00
01/06/12 MASON, LAURA 45.00
01/06/12 HANNIGAN, TYLER 56.00
01/06/12 KUSTERMAN, KEVIN 35.00
01/06/12 BOEHM, BRIAN 29.00
01/06/12 HANNIGAN, RACHEL 48.00
01/06/12 ABRAHAMSON, AMANDA 35.00
01/06/12 AYD, GWEN 29.00
01/06/12 WELCHLIN, CABOT 11,336.88
01/06/12 SZCZEPANSKI, JOSEPH 20.00
01/06/12 FRANZEN, NICHOLAS 2,509.90
01/06/12 KREGER, JASON 2,066.40
01/06/12 BERGO, CHAD 2,651.63
01/06/12 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 3,826.42
01/06/12 PRIEM, STEVEN 2,392.46
01/06/12 WOEHRLE, MATTHEW 2,198.95
01/06/12 THOMPSON, BENJAMIN 363.00
01/06/12 AICHELE, CRAIG 2,222.15
01/06/12 REILLY, MICHAEL 1,915.75
01/06/12 SCHULZE, KEVIN 432.00
Packet Page Number 33 of 138
Packet Page Number 34 of 138
Packet Page Number 35 of 138
AGENDA ITEM G3
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: H. Alan Kantrud, General Counsel
SUBJECT: Approval of Assignment of Bridge Maintenance Agreement
DATE: January 15, 2012
INTRODUCTION
Maplewood purchased a section of retired rail and railbed in 2005 from Burlington Northern as
part of its County Road D road project. In completing the process of transfer, counsel for the
railroad has identified a maintenance agreement that needs to be assigned as part of the
purchase.
BACKGROUND
Maplewood purchased several hundred yards of rail and rail-bed stretching from Beam Avenue
to I694 and across I694 onto the north-side road embankment. As Council is aware from having
travelled the new County Road D, the trestle over the roadway was removed as part of the
project but the one spanning I694 remains.
As with most railroad bridges that span MNDOT roadways stand-alone agreements accompany
them that call-out the responsibility for maintaining the bridge(s). The original 1965 Agreement
(attached as Exhibit 1) is the one that governs the bridge over the I694 roadway. The City and
BNSF are the principals, and Minnesota Commercial is the entity adjacent to the railbed to the
north (their rails start at Buerkle Road) which also leased part of the BNSF premises.
Upon the sale to the City an Assignment of the 1965 Agreement should have been made as
well. Since there are ongoing efforts being made to get the rail de-certified, the file is still be
dealt with and this matter was identified as having been missed during the transaction (in 2005).
DISCUSSION
The bridge itself is fairly robust and since no rail traffic is anticipated on it, the City will not be
expending any dollars in upkeep of the structure. However, if the City does initiate repairs or
maintenance, the MNDOT will reimburse the City for those costs anyway pursuant to the
Agreement (see paragraph 10 of the 1965 Agreement).
Since the City has purchased the Railbed and the Bridge that supports it, the Assignment
(attached as Exhibit 2) is simply a matter of housekeeping that assigns the responsibility to
maintain the bridge onto the new owner, the City.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Assignment Agreement from BNSF to City.
Attachments: (1) Agreement of Assignment; (2)1965 Maintenance Agreement
Packet Page Number 36 of 138
AGREEMENT OF ASSIGNMENT, ASSUMPTION, AND CONSENT
This is an Agreement of Assignment, Assumption, and Consent (this
“Assignment”) by and among City of Maplewood (the “City”), a Minnesota municipal
corporation, BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”), a Delaware corporation, Minnesota
Commercial Railway Company (“Minnesota Commercial”), a Minnesota corporation,
and the State of Minnesota through its Commissioner of Transportation (the “State”).
The premises of this Agreement are as follow:
A. Pursuant to that certain Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement dated
effective September 26, 2005, by and among the City, BNSF, and Minnesota Commercial
(the “Sale Agreement”), City purchased certain property (the “Property”) from BNSF.
B. Minnesota Commercial was made a party to the Sale Agreement because
it was providing freight rail service on the Property under a lease with BNSF.
C. The transaction contemplated by the Sale Agreement was consummated
on September 30, 2005 (the “Closing”).
D. The Property acquired by the City pursuant to the Sale Agreement
included a railroad bridge (the “Bridge”) that crosses over Interstate Highway 694.
E. It has come to the attention of the parties that there are certain agreements
between Northern Pacific Railway Company (“NP”) (BNSF’s predecessor by merger)
and the State that pertain to the construction, maintenance, and use of the Bridge
(collectively, the “Bridge Agreements”), to wit: (1) Agreement dated November 16,
1965, a true copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment 1 (which Agreement is
variously identified as State Agreement No. 54881 and BNSF agreement number
NP17937); (2) Supplemental Agreement No. 1 dated February 21, 1966, a true copy of
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 37 of 138
2
which is attached hereto as Attachment 2; and (3) letter agreement regarding a directional
highway sign on the Bridge, as set forth in letter dated July 29, 1969 from the State to NP
and letter dated October 30, 1969 from NP to the State, true copies of which are attached
hereto as Attachment 3.
F. It was the intent of the City, BNSF, and Minnesota Commercial that the
Bridge Agreements be included as part of the City’s purchase of the Property. In the
event there is any doubt concerning such intent, the City, BNSF, and Minnesota
Commercial desire to clarify such intent through this Assignment.
G. Consequently, BNSF and Minnesota Commercial desire to assign and
transfer to the City, retroactive to the Closing, all of BNSF’s and Minnesota
Commercial’s rights, interests, obligations, and liabilities under the Bridge Agreements,
all in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Assignment.
H. The City is willing to accept such assignment and transfer, all in
accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Assignment.
I. The State is willing to consent to such assignment and transfer, all in
accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Assignment.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each of the parties, the parties agree as
follows:
1. BNSF and Minnesota Commercial hereby assign and transfer to the City
all of BNSF’s and Minnesota Commercial’s rights, interests, obligations, and liabilities
under the Bridge Agreements, effective retroactive to the Closing.
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 38 of 138
3
2. The City hereby accepts such assignment and transfer and assumes all of
BNSF’s and Minnesota Commercial’s obligations and liabilities under the Bridge
Agreements, effective retroactive to the Closing.
3. The State hereby consents to the foregoing assignment and transfer and
hereby releases BNSF and Minnesota Commercial from any obligations and liabilities
arising under the Bridge Agreements from and after the Closing.
[balance of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow]
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 39 of 138
4
[signature page for Agreement of Assignment, Assumption, and Consent]
City of Maplewood
By:_____________________________
Print Name:______________________
Title: ___________________________
Date: ___________________________
and
By:_____________________________
Print Name:______________________
Title: ___________________________
Date: ___________________________
Approved as to form:
By:_____________________________
Print Name:______________________
Title: ___________________________
Date: ___________________________
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 40 of 138
5
[signature page for Agreement of Assignment, Assumption, and Consent]
BNSF Railway Company
By:_____________________________
Print Name:______________________
Title: ___________________________
Date: ___________________________
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 41 of 138
6
[signature page for Agreement of Assignment, Assumption, and Consent]
Minnesota Commercial Railway Company
By:_____________________________
Print Name:______________________
Title: ___________________________
Date: ___________________________
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 42 of 138
7
[signature page for Agreement of Assignment, Assumption, and Consent]
STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Recommended for Approval: COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
By: _____________________________ By: ______________________________
Manager, Railroad Administration Section Director, Freight, Railroads and
Waterways
Date: ____________________________ Date: _____________________________
STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION
Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. §§ 16A.15 and
16C.05
Signed: _________________________ Date: _____________ MAPS: __________________
APPROVED:
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
By: ______________________________________
Authorized Signature
Date: _____________________________________
c/client files/maplewood sale\agreement of assignment rev 12.12.2011.docx
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 43 of 138
8
Attachment 1
[Attach copy of Agreement dated November 16, 1965 and Exhibits A, B, C, D, and E
thereto]
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 44 of 138
9
Attachment 2
[attach copy of Supplemental Agreement No. 1 dated February 21, 1966 and Exhibit C
thereto]
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 45 of 138
10
Attachment 3
[attach clean copy of letter dated July 29, 1969 from the State to NP and letter dated
October 30, 1969 from NP to the State]
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 46 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 47 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 48 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 49 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 50 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 51 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 52 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 53 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 54 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 55 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 56 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 57 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 58 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 59 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 60 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 61 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 62 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 63 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 64 of 138
Agenda Item G3
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 65 of 138
AGENDA ITEM G-4
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: January 17, 2012
TO: Jim Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Terrie Rameaux, Human Resource Coordinator
Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of 2012 Pay Equity Report
BACKGROUND
The City of Maplewood is scheduled to submit the 2012 Pay Equity Implementation
Report to Minnesota Management & Budget (formerly the Department of Finance
and Department of Employee Relations) as required by the Local Government Pay
Equity Act, MN Statutes 471.991 – 471.999 and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 3920.
Jurisdictions are on a three-year schedule and this is the scheduled year for
Maplewood. The deadline for submission is January 31, 2012. This report, upon
approval by the City Council, will be submitted to Minnesota Management & Budget
for review.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Pay Equity
Implementation Report for submission to Minnesota Management & Budget
Department for review.
Attachment:
1. 2012 Pay Equity Implementation Report
Packet Page Number 66 of 138
G-4—Attachment #1
PAY EQUITY IMPLEMENTATION REPORT
2012
Part A: Jurisdiction Identification
Jurisdiction: Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood
Jurisdiction Type: CITY - City
Contact:
Name Title Phone Email
Terrie Rameaux HR Coordinator 651-249-2054 terrie.rameaux@ci.maplewood.mn.us
Part B: Official Verification
1. The job evaluation system used measured skill, effort
responsibility and working conditions and the same system was
used for all classes of employees.
The system used was: Consultant's System (specify)
Describe:
PDI
2.
Health Insurance benefits for male and female classes of
comparable value have been evaluated and
There is no difference and female classes are not at
a disadvantage.
Part C: Total Payroll
12,648,595 is the annual payroll for the calendar year just
ended December 31.
.
3.An official notice has been posted at:
BULLETIN BOARD (prominent location)
informing employees that the Pay equity Implementation
Report has been filed and is available to employees upon
request. A copy of the notice has been sent to each exclusive
representative, if any, and also to the public library.
The report was approved by:
City Council (governing body)
Will Rossbach (chief elected official)
Mayor (title)
Checking this box indicates the following:
signature of chief elected official
approval by governing body
all information is complete and accurate, and
all employees over which the jurisdiction has final
budgetary authority are included
Packet Page Number 67 of 138
Compliance Report
Jurisdiction:
Contact:Phone:
Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood MN 55109
2012
Case:
Report Year:
1 - 2012 DATA test (Private (Jur Only))
Terrie Rameaux terrie.rameaux@ci.maplewood.mn.us(651) 249-2054 E-Mail:
The statistical analysis, salary range and exceptional service pay test results are shown below. Part I is general information
from your pay equity report data. Parts II, III and IV give you the test results.
For more detail on each test, refer to the Guide to Pay Equity Compliance and Computer Reports.
I. GENERAL JOB CLASS INFORMATION
Male
Classes
Female
Classes
Balanced
Classes
All Job
Classes
# Job Classes
# Employees
Avg. Max Monthly
Pay per employee
II. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TEST
A. Underpayment Ratio =
Male
Classes
Female
Classes
a. # At or above Predicted Pay
b. # Below Predicted Pay
c. TOTAL
d. % Below Predicted Pay
(b divided by c = d)
*
*(Result is % of male classes below predicted pay divided by % of female classes below predicted pay.)
B. T-test Results
Degrees of Freedom (DF) = Value of T =
a. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for male jobs =
b. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for female jobs =
III. SALARY RANGE TEST = (Result is A divided by B)
A. Avg. # of years to max salary for male jobs =
B. Avg. # of years to max salary for female jobs =
IV. EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE PAY TEST = (Result is B divided by A)
A. % of male classes receiving ESP *
B. % of female classes receiving ESP
*(If 20% or less, test result will be 0.00)
50 25 3 78
123 48 9 180
6,124.31 4,791.67 5,701.42
87.50
15 5
35 20
50 25
70.00 80.00
169 3.344
($13)
($236)
93.66
6.18
6.60
0.00
6.00
4.00
Packet Page Number 68 of 138
Job
Nbr
Class
Title
Nbr
Males
Nbr
Females
Class
Type
Jobs
Points
Min Mo
Salary
Max Mo
Salary
Yrs to Max
Salary
Yrs of
Service
Exceptional
Service Pay
2012 DATA testCase:
Maplewood
Job Class Data Entry Verification List 730LGID
1 MAINTENANCE TRAINEE 1 0 M 42 $3,204.00 $3,357.00 2.00 0.00
2 BUILDING CUSTODIAN 2 1 B 42 $2,759.00 $3,527.00 7.00 0.00
3 LIFEGUARD 2 1 B 44 $1,797.00 $2,296.00 7.00 0.00
4 CUSTOMER SERVICE REP 0 2 F 45 $2,236.00 $2,856.00 7.00 0.00
5 BUILDING MAINT WORKER 1 0 M 46 $3,525.00 $4,504.00 7.00 0.00
71 SR CUSTOMER SERVICE REP 0 1 F 46 $2,459.00 $3,142.00 7.00 0.00
6 OFFICE SPECIALIST 0 19 F 50 $3,112.00 $3,977.00 7.00 0.00
7 LEAD CUSTODIAN 1 0 M 50 $3,170.00 $4,050.00 7.00 0.00
8 COMMUNITY SRV OFFICER 2 0 M 50 $3,080.00 $3,934.00 7.00 0.00
9 FACILITY TECHNICIAN 1 0 M 50 $3,170.00 $4,050.00 7.00 0.00
13 ACTIVITIES COORDINATOR 0 1 F 50 $3,301.00 $4,424.00 6.00 0.00
16 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 0 2 F 50 $3,489.00 $4,456.00 7.00 0.00
10 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 0 3 F 52 $3,372.00 $4,308.00 7.00 0.00 longevity
11 HEAVY EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 2 0 M 54 $3,615.00 $4,620.00 7.00 0.00
12 MAINTENANCE WORKER 12 0 M 54 $3,525.00 $4,504.00 7.00 0.00 longevity
18 ADMIN OFFICE COORD 0 1 F 54 $3,710.00 $4,740.00 7.00 0.00
14 MEMBER SERVICE COORD. 0 1 F 55 $3,301.00 $4,424.00 6.00 0.00
17 LEAD LICENSING SPECIALIST 0 1 F 56 $3,865.00 $4,955.00 7.00 0.00
19 SR ADMINISTRATIVE ASST 0 1 F 58 $3,839.00 $4,901.00 0.00 3.00
20 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 1 0 M 60 $3,643.00 $4,655.00 7.00 0.00
21 NATURALIST 0 2 F 62 $3,807.00 $4,865.00 7.00 0.00
22 MECHANIC CREW CHIEF 1 0 M 64 $3,976.00 $5,078.00 7.00 0.00
23 STREET MAINT. CREW CHIEF 1 0 M 64 $3,877.00 $4,955.00 7.00 0.00
24 STORM SEWER CREW CHIEF 1 0 M 64 $3,877.00 $4,955.00 7.00 0.00
25 SANITARY SEWER CREW CHIEF 1 0 M 64 $3,877.00 $4,955.00 7.00 0.00
30 MARKETING&ADVERT COORD 0 1 F 64 $4,152.00 $5,305.00 7.00 0.00
72 PARKS CREW CHIEF 1 0 M 64 $3,877.00 $4,955.00 7.00 0.00
26 POLICE OFFICER 35 4 M 65 $4,006.00 $6,181.00 3.00 0.00 longevity
73 IT TECHNICIAN 1 0 M 65 $3,750.00 $4,960.00 0.00 1.00
27 PAYROLL COORDINATOR 0 1 F 66 $4,045.00 $5,403.00 0.00 5.00
28 RECREATION COORDINATOR 1 0 M 66 $3,698.00 $4,958.00 6.00 0.00
15 FITNESS SUPERVISOR 0 1 F 68 $4,062.00 $5,445.00 6.00 0.00
29 FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 10 2 M 68 $4,434.00 $5,588.00 5.00 0.00
31 GIS ANALYST 1 0 M 73 $4,261.00 $5,637.00 0.00 11.00
32 ACCOUNTANT 0 1 F 73 $4,754.00 $6,074.00 7.00 0.00
33 AQUATICS MANAGER 1 0 M 74 $4,062.00 $5,445.00 6.00 0.00
34 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN SR. 4 0 M 74 $4,516.00 $5,769.00 7.00 0.00
35 FIRE CAPTAIN/EMT 2 0 M 74 $4,767.00 $5,978.00 5.00 0.00
36 LEAD NATURALIST 0 1 F 74 $4,114.00 $5,516.00 6.00 0.00
74 BANQUET & EVENTS MGR 0 1 F 74 $4,405.00 $5,904.00 6.00 0.00
37 IT/NETWORK ANALYST 1 0 M 75 $4,216.00 $5,575.00 0.00 6.00
38 PUB WKS OPERATIONS ANALYST 1 0 M 75 $4,514.00 $5,767.00 7.00 0.00
39 ENVIRONM HEALTH OFFICIAL 0 1 F 75 $4,608.00 $5,889.00 7.00 0.00
40 BUILDING INSPECTOR 2 0 M 75 $4,566.00 $5,833.00 7.00 0.00
41 CHIEF BUILDING ENGINEER 1 0 M 76 $4,996.00 $6,695.00 6.00 0.00
42 CIVIL ENGINEER I 1 0 M 76 $4,837.00 $6,182.00 7.00 0.00
43 CITIZEN SERVICES SUPERVISOR 0 1 F 76 $4,707.00 $6,306.00 6.00 0.00
44 PLANNER 1 0 M 76 $4,650.00 $5,944.00 7.00 0.00
45 TECHNICAL ASST-POLICE 1 0 M 76 $4,840.00 $6,185.00 7.00 0.00
48 HUMAN RESOURCE COORD 0 1 F 76 $4,804.00 $6,374.00 0.00 5.00
46 SERGEANT 7 0 M 78 $6,469.00 $7,645.00 3.00 0.00 longevity
47 PARK MAINT FOREMAN 1 0 M 78 $4,996.00 $6,695.00 6.00 0.00
49 FIRE CAPTAIN/PARAMEDIC 1 0 M 78 $4,988.00 $6,257.00 5.00 0.00
50 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER 0 1 F 80 $5,346.00 $6,837.00 7.00 0.00
51 NATURAL RESOURCES COORD 0 1 F 80 $5,041.00 $6,755.00 6.00 0.00
52 ASST BUILDING OFFICIAL 1 0 M 82 $5,041.00 $6,755.00 6.00 0.00
75 PARKS MANAGER 1 0 M 82 $5,173.00 $6,934.00 6.00 0.00
76 RECREATION MANAGER 0 1 F 82 $5,173.00 $6,934.00 6.00 0.00
1
Packet Page Number 69 of 138
Job
Nbr
Class
Title
Nbr
Males
Nbr
Females
Class
Type
Jobs
Points
Min Mo
Salary
Max Mo
Salary
Yrs to Max
Salary
Yrs of
Service
Exceptional
Service Pay
2012 DATA testCase:
Maplewood
Job Class Data Entry Verification List 730LGID
53 SENIOR PLANNER 1 0 M 84 $5,993.00 $7,954.00 6.00 0.00
54 STREET MAINT SUPERINTENDENT 1 0 M 84 $5,838.00 $7,551.00 0.00 7.00
55 SAN SEWER/VEM SUPERINTENDENT 1 0 M 84 $5,838.00 $7,551.00 0.00 2.00
56 CIVIL ENGINEER II 1 0 M 84 $5,322.00 $6,800.00 7.00 0.00
62 ASSISTANT FINANCE MANAGER 1 0 M 90 $5,348.00 $6,972.00 0.00 1.00
59 POLICE LIEUTENANT 2 1 B 92 $7,324.00 $8,499.00 0.00 6.00
60 IT DIRECTOR 1 0 M 92 $6,064.00 $7,965.00 0.00 6.00
61 BUILDING OFFICIAL 1 0 M 92 $5,962.00 $7,909.00 6.00 0.00
57 FIRE MARSHAL/ASST. FIRE CHIEF 1 0 M 95 $6,499.00 $8,299.00 0.00 3.00
58 ASST FIRE CHIEF/EMS 1 0 M 95 $6,499.00 $8,299.00 0.00 1.00
63 ASST. CITY ENGINEER 1 0 M 98 $5,937.00 $7,691.00 0.00 3.00
66 FINANCE MANAGER 0 1 F 100 $6,601.00 $8,769.00 0.00 2.00
77 CITY ENGINEER/DEPUTY PW DIR 1 0 M 102 $6,691.00 $8,431.00 0.00 3.00
78 DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF 1 0 M 102 $7,823.00 $8,724.00 0.00 2.00
64 FIRE CHIEF 1 0 M 105 $7,175.00 $9,568.00 0.00 11.00
65 POLICE CHIEF 1 0 M 108 $8,346.00 $10,282.00 0.00 9.00
67 CITIZEN SRVS DIR/CITY CLERK 0 1 F 110 $7,329.00 $9,062.00 0.00 5.00
70 PARKS & REC DIRECTOR 1 0 M 110 $7,500.00 $9,147.00 0.00 2.00
68 ASST. CITY MGR/PW DIRECTOR 1 0 M 114 $10,329.00 $10,329.00 0.00 3.00
69 CITY MANAGER 1 0 M 132 $10,831.00 $10,831.00 0.00 3.00
78Job Number Count:
2
Packet Page Number 70 of 138
Case : 2012 DATA test
Predicted Pay Report for Maplewood 1/13/2012
40 60 80 100 120 140
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Male Jobs Female Jobs Balanced Jobs Predicted Pay
Line Continuation (Min)Line Continuation (Max)
PointsSalary
Page 1 of 4Packet Page Number 71 of 138
1/13/2012
Job
Nbr
Job Title Job
Points
Max Mo
Salary
Job
Type
Nbr
Males
Pay
Difference
Predicted
Pay
Nbr
Females
Total
Nbr
Predicted Pay Report for Maplewood
Case : 2012 DATA test
1 MAINTENANCE TRAINEE 42 $3,357.00 Male 1 $25.08 $3,331.92 0 1
2 BUILDING CUSTODIAN 42 $3,527.00 Balanced 2 $195.08 $3,331.92 1 3
3 LIFEGUARD 44 $2,296.00 Balanced 2 ($1,251.70)$3,547.70 1 3
4 CUSTOMER SERVICE REP 45 $2,856.00 Female 0 ($799.58)$3,655.58 2 2
5 BUILDING MAINT WORKER 46 $4,504.00 Male 1 $740.53 $3,763.47 0 1
71 SR CUSTOMER SERVICE REP 46 $3,142.00 Female 0 ($621.47)$3,763.47 1 1
6 OFFICE SPECIALIST 50 $3,977.00 Female 0 ($218.51)$4,195.51 19 19
7 LEAD CUSTODIAN 50 $4,050.00 Male 1 ($145.51)$4,195.51 0 1
8 COMMUNITY SRV OFFICER 50 $3,934.00 Male 2 ($261.51)$4,195.51 0 2
9 FACILITY TECHNICIAN 50 $4,050.00 Male 1 ($145.51)$4,195.51 0 1
13 ACTIVITIES COORDINATOR 50 $4,424.00 Female 0 $228.49 $4,195.51 1 1
16 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 50 $4,456.00 Female 0 $260.49 $4,195.51 2 2
10 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 52 $4,308.00 Female 0 ($103.77)$4,411.77 3 3
11 HEAVY EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 54 $4,620.00 Male 2 ($7.54)$4,627.54 0 2
12 MAINTENANCE WORKER 54 $4,504.00 Male 12 ($123.54)$4,627.54 0 12
18 ADMIN OFFICE COORD 54 $4,740.00 Female 0 $112.46 $4,627.54 1 1
14 MEMBER SERVICE COORD. 55 $4,424.00 Female 0 ($311.43)$4,735.43 1 1
17 LEAD LICENSING SPECIALIST 56 $4,955.00 Female 0 $401.33 $4,553.67 1 1
19 SR ADMINISTRATIVE ASST 58 $4,901.00 Female 0 ($143.91)$5,044.91 1 1
20 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 60 $4,655.00 Male 1 ($616.41)$5,271.41 0 1
21 NATURALIST 62 $4,865.00 Female 0 ($625.31)$5,490.31 2 2
22 MECHANIC CREW CHIEF 64 $5,078.00 Male 1 ($510.41)$5,588.41 0 1
23 STREET MAINT. CREW CHIEF 64 $4,955.00 Male 1 ($633.41)$5,588.41 0 1
24 STORM SEWER CREW CHIEF 64 $4,955.00 Male 1 ($633.41)$5,588.41 0 1
25 SANITARY SEWER CREW CHIEF 64 $4,955.00 Male 1 ($633.41)$5,588.41 0 1
30 MARKETING&ADVERT COORD 64 $5,305.00 Female 0 ($283.41)$5,588.41 1 1
72 PARKS CREW CHIEF 64 $4,955.00 Male 1 ($633.41)$5,588.41 0 1
26 POLICE OFFICER 65 $6,181.00 Male 35 $284.47 $5,896.53 4 39
73 IT TECHNICIAN 65 $4,960.00 Male 1 ($936.53)$5,896.53 0 1
27 PAYROLL COORDINATOR 66 $5,403.00 Female 0 ($479.39)$5,882.39 1 1
28 RECREATION COORDINATOR 66 $4,958.00 Male 1 ($924.39)$5,882.39 0 1
15 FITNESS SUPERVISOR 68 $5,445.00 Female 0 ($444.81)$5,889.81 1 1
29 FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 68 $5,588.00 Male 10 ($301.81)$5,889.81 2 12
31 GIS ANALYST 73 $5,637.00 Male 1 ($685.52)$6,322.52 0 1
32 ACCOUNTANT 73 $6,074.00 Female 0 ($248.52)$6,322.52 1 1
Page 2 of 4Packet Page Number 72 of 138
1/13/2012
Job
Nbr
Job Title Job
Points
Max Mo
Salary
Job
Type
Nbr
Males
Pay
Difference
Predicted
Pay
Nbr
Females
Total
Nbr
Predicted Pay Report for Maplewood
Case : 2012 DATA test
33 AQUATICS MANAGER 74 $5,445.00 Male 1 ($769.95)$6,214.95 0 1
34 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN SR. 74 $5,769.00 Male 4 ($445.95)$6,214.95 0 4
35 FIRE CAPTAIN/EMT 74 $5,978.00 Male 2 ($236.95)$6,214.95 0 2
36 LEAD NATURALIST 74 $5,516.00 Female 0 ($698.95)$6,214.95 1 1
74 BANQUET & EVENTS MGR 74 $5,904.00 Female 0 ($310.95)$6,214.95 1 1
37 IT/NETWORK ANALYST 75 $5,575.00 Male 1 ($776.88)$6,351.88 0 1
38 PUB WKS OPERATIONS ANALYST 75 $5,767.00 Male 1 ($584.88)$6,351.88 0 1
39 ENVIRONM HEALTH OFFICIAL 75 $5,889.00 Female 0 ($462.88)$6,351.88 1 1
40 BUILDING INSPECTOR 75 $5,833.00 Male 2 ($518.88)$6,351.88 0 2
41 CHIEF BUILDING ENGINEER 76 $6,695.00 Male 1 $221.79 $6,473.21 0 1
42 CIVIL ENGINEER I 76 $6,182.00 Male 1 ($291.21)$6,473.21 0 1
43 CITIZEN SERVICES SUPERVISOR 76 $6,306.00 Female 0 ($167.21)$6,473.21 1 1
44 PLANNER 76 $5,944.00 Male 1 ($529.21)$6,473.21 0 1
45 TECHNICAL ASST-POLICE 76 $6,185.00 Male 1 ($288.21)$6,473.21 0 1
48 HUMAN RESOURCE COORD 76 $6,374.00 Female 0 ($99.21)$6,473.21 1 1
46 SERGEANT 78 $7,645.00 Male 7 $937.83 $6,707.17 0 7
47 PARK MAINT FOREMAN 78 $6,695.00 Male 1 ($12.17)$6,707.17 0 1
49 FIRE CAPTAIN/PARAMEDIC 78 $6,257.00 Male 1 ($450.17)$6,707.17 0 1
50 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER 80 $6,837.00 Female 0 ($229.40)$7,066.40 1 1
51 NATURAL RESOURCES COORD 80 $6,755.00 Female 0 ($311.40)$7,066.40 1 1
52 ASST BUILDING OFFICIAL 82 $6,755.00 Male 1 ($412.12)$7,167.12 0 1
75 PARKS MANAGER 82 $6,934.00 Male 1 ($233.12)$7,167.12 0 1
76 RECREATION MANAGER 82 $6,934.00 Female 0 ($233.12)$7,167.12 1 1
53 SENIOR PLANNER 84 $7,954.00 Male 1 $604.09 $7,349.91 0 1
54 STREET MAINT SUPERINTENDENT 84 $7,551.00 Male 1 $201.09 $7,349.91 0 1
55 SAN SEWER/VEM SUPERINTENDENT 84 $7,551.00 Male 1 $201.09 $7,349.91 0 1
56 CIVIL ENGINEER II 84 $6,800.00 Male 1 ($549.91)$7,349.91 0 1
62 ASSISTANT FINANCE MANAGER 90 $6,972.00 Male 1 ($681.24)$7,653.24 0 1
59 POLICE LIEUTENANT 92 $8,499.00 Balanced 2 $622.35 $7,876.65 1 3
60 IT DIRECTOR 92 $7,965.00 Male 1 $88.35 $7,876.65 0 1
61 BUILDING OFFICIAL 92 $7,909.00 Male 1 $32.35 $7,876.65 0 1
57 FIRE MARSHAL/ASST. FIRE CHIEF 95 $8,299.00 Male 1 $68.79 $8,230.21 0 1
58 ASST FIRE CHIEF/EMS 95 $8,299.00 Male 1 $68.79 $8,230.21 0 1
63 ASST. CITY ENGINEER 98 $7,691.00 Male 1 ($674.06)$8,365.06 0 1
66 FINANCE MANAGER 100 $8,769.00 Female 0 $173.07 $8,595.93 1 1
Page 3 of 4Packet Page Number 73 of 138
1/13/2012
Job
Nbr
Job Title Job
Points
Max Mo
Salary
Job
Type
Nbr
Males
Pay
Difference
Predicted
Pay
Nbr
Females
Total
Nbr
Predicted Pay Report for Maplewood
Case : 2012 DATA test
77 CITY ENGINEER/DEPUTY PW DIR 102 $8,431.00 Male 1 ($409.99)$8,840.99 0 1
78 DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF 102 $8,724.00 Male 1 ($116.99)$8,840.99 0 1
64 FIRE CHIEF 105 $9,568.00 Male 1 $366.54 $9,201.46 0 1
65 POLICE CHIEF 108 $10,282.00 Male 1 $754.41 $9,527.59 0 1
67 CITIZEN SRVS DIR/CITY CLERK 110 $9,062.00 Female 0 ($396.78)$9,458.78 1 1
70 PARKS & REC DIRECTOR 110 $9,147.00 Male 1 ($311.78)$9,458.78 0 1
68 ASST. CITY MGR/PW DIRECTOR 114 $10,329.00 Male 1 $511.61 $9,817.39 0 1
69 CITY MANAGER 132 $10,831.00 Male 1 ($599.95)$11,430.95 0 1
Job Number Count: 78
Page 4 of 4Packet Page Number 74 of 138
Agenda Report G5
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Jim Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, Citizen Services Director
DATE: January 13, 2012
SUBJECT: Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary Temporary Gambling
Permit Resolution
Introduction
An application has been submitted for temporary gambling by Stephen Blessing on behalf of the
Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, 1725 Kennard Street. This is for their
Spring Festival event.
The event will be held on May 5, 2012 from 5:00 p.m.to 11:00 p.m. and on May 6, 2012 from
11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Funds raised will be used to support general operations.
In order for the State of Minnesota to issue a temporary license, approval of the following
resolution from the City is required:
RESOLUTION
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the
temporary premises permit for lawful gambling on May 5, 2012 and May 6, 2012 is approved for
the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary (BVM), 1725 Kennard Street,
Maplewood.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the
timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control
Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in
compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of
Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the above resolution for a temporary gambling
for the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
Packet Page Number 75 of 138
Agenda Item G6
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: DuWayne Konewko, Parks and Recreation Director
Ron Horwath, Aquatic Manager
SUBJ: Consider Approval of Contract between the City of Maplewood and ISD 622 for
Aquatic Programming Services
DATE: January 15, 2012 – for council meeting on January 23, 2012
INTRODUCTION
The City of Maplewood and Independent School District 622 Community Education (ISD) are
entering into a contract to work cooperatively to provide aquatic program services to the
community at large. The City of Maplewood will provide services to assist in the management
and supervision of the ISD 622 swim lessons, water exercise programs and open swim. I have
attached the proposed contract for council’s review and consideration. The city attorney has
reviewed and approved the language in the proposed contract.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends council approve the contract between the City of Maplewood and ISD 622
for aquatic programming services and authorizes the City Manager to execute contract.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed contract between the City of Maplewood and Independent School District 622 for aquatic
programming services.
Packet Page Number 76 of 138
Agenda Item G6
Final 1-11-12
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES between ISD 622 Community Education
and the City of Maplewood
Name of Contractor: City of Maplewood; Maplewood Community Center (MCC)
Address: 2100 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, MN 55109
Dates of Service: January 9 – August 3, 2012
Times: Varies based of swim lessons schedules; winter schedule attached
Description of Services: The direct supervision of ISD 622 Aquatics staff and coordination of
swimming lessons and water fitness classes to include:
ISD 622 Community Education Stipulations
• The City of Maplewood will provide supervision and evaluation of the 622 winter session
of swimming lessons and water exercise classes.
• The City of Maplewood will plan, schedule, train, supervise and evaluate the 622 spring
and summer sessions of swimming lessons and water exercise classes.
• The City of Maplewood will schedule lifeguards
• The City of Maplewood will schedule
for ISD 622 pool rentals and other
special events such as St. Peter’s Catholic School Swim Team, North High SCUBA, Girls
Swim Night Out, Landfall April Swim Lessons, Adaptive Aquatics, and other private
parties.
Water Safety Instructors
• The City of Maplewood will collaborate with 622 Community Education Manager
regarding 622 swimming lesson/water exercise class fees, equipment needs, scheduling,
staffing, payroll and evaluation.
for Landfall April Swim
Lessons and for other special requests from ISD 622 Community Education Manager.
• Current ISD 622 employees will remain employees of ISD 622 for duration of this
contract. The contractor will approve time sheets & submit to ISD 622 for payment.
When additional staff is required, they will be hired as ISD 622 employees and paid at
District 622 rates.
The City of Maplewood Stipulations
• ISD 622 Community Education will pay for a certified lifeguard to be on the deck during
all swim lessons. This is to ensure optimum patron safety.
• ISD 622 Community Education will pay Water Safety Instructors and Water Safety Aides
for swim lessons.
• ISD 622 Community Education will pay Instructors for Water Fitness and Cardio Water
Workout classes.
• The Maplewood Community Center may use 622 pools for purposes of conducting Red
Cross Lifeguarding, Water Safety Instructor and re-certification courses. These trainings
will be conducted at times that least interferes with other programs such as swim
lessons and water fitness classes and can be for the benefit of both ISD 622 and City of
Maplewood programs; some of these programs may be offered to the public.
Packet Page Number 77 of 138
Agenda Item G6
Final 1-11-12
• Training sessions for both 622 and City of Maplewood staff may be conducted at any of the
available pools or facilities including MCC and may be conducted jointly with 622 and MCC staff.
Staff will be paid by their respective employers for such required trainings.
• Current City of Maplewood employees will remain employees of Maplewood for
duration of this contract. When additional staff is required, City of Maplewood staff can
be hired as ISD 622 employees and paid at District 622 rates. The contractor will
approve time sheets & submit to ISD 622 for payment.
• The City of Maplewood and ISD 622 Community Education mutually agree to indemnify
and hold each other harmless for any and all occurrences relating to coordination,
supervision, management, instruction, lifeguarding, and all other relevant issues relating
to the coordination and operation of a comprehensive aquatics program.
The City of Maplewood and ISD 622 Community Education shall list each other as
additional insured for all aquatic related activities. All insurance policies and/or
agreements relating to aquatic related activities must be reviewed and approved by the
respective attorneys, City Manager for the City of Maplewood and Community
Education Director for ISD 622 Community Education.
All insurance policies and/or agreements relating to aquatic-related activities
shall require that the issuer notify the City of Maplewood and ISD Community per MN
State Statute 60A.35-.38 of any policy cancellation or non-renewal.
• Hold a meeting with Chuck Ericksen, Pat Svendsen, DuWayne Konewko, and Ron
Horwath in April, 2012 to ensure that provisions of the contract are being satisfied.
• Both parties agree to discuss extension of this contract in May, 2012.
• Contract expires on August 3, 2012.
Location of Services: John Glenn Middle School Pool, Skyview Community School Pool and, on a
limited basis, Maplewood Middle School Pool
Total amount to be paid by ISD 622 Community Education to the City of Maplewood: $17,500
This is a contract between Independent School District No. 622 and the contractor as specified
above. It is agreed that the City of Maplewood will invoice ISD 622 Community Education for
the amount of $5,833.34 at the end of each session (3/31/12, 5/31/12, and 8/3/12). Either
party may terminate this Contract upon giving the other party a ninety (90) day written notice.
The contractor is accountable to Patricia Svendsen – ISD 622 Community Education Manager.
Chuck Ericksen: Date:
ISD 622 Community Education Director
Patricia Svendsen: Date:
ISD 622 Community Education Manager
Jim Antonen: Date:
City of Maplewood City Manager
Packet Page Number 78 of 138
Agenda Item G6
Final 1-11-12
DuWayne Konewko: Date:
City of Maplewood Parks and Recreation Director
Packet Page Number 79 of 138
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Michael Thompson, City Engineer / Dep. Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Approval of Appraisal and Acquisition Services for TH 36/English Street
Interchange Improvement, City Project 09-08
DATE: January 13, 2012
INTRODUCTION
The council will consider authorizing the services of a professional team for appraisal and land acquisition
services for the Highway 36 and English Street Interchange project, slated for 2013 construction.
BACKGROUND
On August 23, 2010 the council authorized staff to proceed with tasks generally described as feasibility
study, pursuing additional project funding, public involvement, design surveys, preliminary layouts and
approvals, environmental assessment documentation, and other associated tasks to move this project
forward in coordination with project stakeholders.
Since that time a number of public open-houses, one-on-one meetings, and citizen design committee
meetings have been held to shape this into a successful project that balances impacts yet accomplishes
the goals of the project such as improved mobility along Highway 36, and providing access to local
businesses and residents. A public hearing for the environmental assessment portion of the project is
expected in February of this year in addition to an official project Public Hearing in March/April of this year.
The Public Hearing would serve as the official vote by the City Council in moving the project into final
design and construction.
Layout approvals and environmental work is finalized. The detailed survey and soil testing is complete and
the preliminary roadway, drainage and bridge plan designs are underway. Final design services would
likely be started in the February/March 2012 timeframe upon completion of the 30% set of plans which was
authorized by the council at the October 24, 2011 council meeting.
APPRAISAL AND ACQUISITION SERVICES
Appraisals are needed for this project for both land acquisition and special benefit analysis. In addition,
acquisition services are needed to acquire the needed land to successfully construct the interchange
improvement project. Staff solicited this work and received three responsive proposals for professional
teams to complete the stated work tasks. These proposals were then ranked based on criteria such as
experience, project team members, and cost.
The following is a summary of the proposals as it relates to cost in addition to the ranking order based on
all criteria by the selection team:
Firm Total Cost Ranking
Proposer #1 $ 62,845.00 Overall Rank=1*
Proposer #2 $ 108,173.00 Overall Rank=2
Proposer #3 $ 87,900.00 Overall Rank=3
*Proposer #1 is Evergreen Land Services Company who is recommended to perform the services.
Agenda Item G7
Packet Page Number 80 of 138
BUDGET
As this project has moved forward a draft financing plan was revised in December 2011. The construction
cost is estimated at just over $14.5 million with a total project cost estimate of roughly $18 million; at this
time just under $16 million is identified in funding sources. This leaves a $2 million gap that must be filled
between now and the project letting in 2013.
Total Cost
STP
Interchange
$
STP Water
Quality $ MNDOT Ramsey County
Cooperative
Agreement City RWMWD Total Sources
Total
Project
Cost $17,780,000 $7,350,000 $248,000 $4,500,000 $250,000 $500,000 $2,115,000 $732,000 $15,695,000
The current budget is set at $17.78 million, and roughly 3.5% has been spent to date. The work for the
appraisal and acquisition services was included in the overall project budget, thus awarding this work will
not affect the approved budget.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize Evergreen Land Services Company to perform the
appraisal and acquisition services for the TH 36/English Street Interchange Improvement, City Project 09-
08, proposed in an amount of $62,845.00.
Agenda Item G7
Packet Page Number 81 of 138
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Michael Thompson, City Engineer/ Deputy Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution of Support for Mn/DOT Local Road Improvement Grant
Funding Application, TH 36 and English Street Interchange Improvements,
City Project 09-08
DATE: January 17, 2012
INTRODUCTION
City staff is planning to pursue Routes of Regional Significance grant funding through MnDOT’s Local
Road Improvement Program (LRIP) for the TH 36 and English Street Interchange Improvements project. A
resolution of support from the City Council is required to accompany the application for these grant funds.
BACKGROUND
The 2011 Legislature approved $10 million of state transportation bond funds in the Local Road
Improvement Program (LRIP). These funds are used to assist townships, cities and counties in paying the
costs of constructing or reconstructing local road projects with statewide or regional significance.
Criteria for submitting projects are:
Projects must be approved for construction letting by June of 2013
The road improvement must qualify as regionally significant
The project must correct a transportation deficiency and incorporate a safety strategy as part of the
proposed improvement project
Funding is capped at $500,000.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution in support of MnDOT’s LRIP
Routes of Regional Signficance grant funding application.
Attachments:
1. Resolution: TH 36 and English Street Interchange Improvements, C.P. 09-08 - Funding Application
Agenda Item G8
Packet Page Number 82 of 138
RESOLUTION
SUPPORTING MNDOT LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (LRIP) FUNDING
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL FOR THE TRUNK HIGHWAY (TH) 36 AND ENGLISH STREET
INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood is the official governing body; and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is planning to construct improvements to the TH 36 and
English Street Interchange area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is requesting financial participation for the TH 36 and
English Street Interchange Improvements from the Minnesota Department of Transportation
through their Local Road Improvement Program grant; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The City of Maplewood is hereby authorized to apply for Local Road Improvement
Program Grant Funding for City Project 09-08 – TH 36 and English Street Interchange
Improvements.
Approved this 23rd day of January 2012
Agenda Item G8
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 83 of 138
MEMORANDUM
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Planner
Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review —The Seasons at Maplewood
(formerly known as the Regent)
LOCATION: Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway
DATE: January 17, 2012
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Seasons at Maplewood Senior Housing is due for its
annual review. The Seasons at Maplewood used to be called The Regent at Legacy Village.
BACKGROUND
September 10, 2007: The council adopted a resolution approving plans date-stamped August
20, 2007 for the revision to the previously-approved PUD concept plan allowing the Regent at
Legacy Village senior building to increase the number of units from 120 to 150. This PUD
revision also allowed the reduction in the square-foot area of the intensive-care units from 580
square feet to 382 square feet. Approval was based on the findings required by Resolution 07-
08-161 (attached) passed at that meeting.
January 26, 2009: The city council reviewed the CUP and agreed to review it again in one year.
January 25, 2010: The city council reviewed the CUP and agreed to review it again in one year.
January 24, 2011: The city council reviewed the CUP and agreed to review it again in one year.
DISCUSSION
Construction of the Seasons at Maplewood Senior Housing project is complete and is in
compliance with the conditions of approval. Staff recommends that the city council review this
CUP only if a problem arises or if the owner proposes a major change.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit for the Seasons at Maplewood only if a problem arises or if
the owner proposes a major change.
p:\sec3\Legacy Village\Seasons Snrs CUP REV_012312
1. Council Minutes for September 10, 2007
Attachments
2. Location/Zoning Map
Agenda Item G9
Packet Page Number 84 of 138
2
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m., Monday, September 10, 2007
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 07-16
1. The Regents Senior Housing Development (Kennard Street and
Legacy Parkway)
a. Pl anned Unit Development (PUD) Revisions
b. Parking Reduction Authorization
c. Design Approval
1. Senior Planner, Tom Ekstrand presented the report
2. Frank James, General Counsel for Hartford Group, 7900
Xerxes Avenue South, Suite 1300, Bloomington, addressed
and answered questions of the council.
3. Patrick Sarver, ASLA, Director of Development for the
Hartford Group, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Suite 1300,
Bloomington, addressed and answered questions of the
council.
4. Maplewood Fire Chief, Steve Lukin answered questions of
the council.
5. Planning Commissioner, Tushar Desai gave the Planning
Commission report.
6. Community Design Review Board member, Matt Wise gave
the Community Design Review Board report.
7. Carolyn Peterson, 1801 Gervais Avenue, #301, Maplewood,
addressed the council. She spoke about the needs she
would be looking for in independent and assisted living.
Councilmember Cave moved to adopt the attached resolution to approve plans
date-stamped August 20, 2007 for the revision to the previously-approved PUD
concept plan allowing the Regent at Legacy Village senior building to increase
the number of units from 120 to 150. This PUD revision also allows the
reduction in the square-foot area of the intensive-care units from 580 square feet
to 382 400 square feet. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance
and because of the following reasons
WHEREAS, The Hartford Group applied for a revision to the planned unit
development (PUD) for The Regent, the senior’s housing complex at Legacy
Village of Maplewood. The proposed PUD revision was to increase the
previously-approved density from 120 to 150 multi-family units. This PUD
revision also includes a reduction in unit size for the 15 intensive-care and 15
:
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVISION
RESOLUTION 07-08-161
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 85 of 138
3
memory-care units from 580 square feet to 382 square feet.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the three-acre site in Legacy Village
lying southeast of the intersection of Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway.
Drive. The legal description is:
Lot 1, Block 3 of Legacy Village of Maplewood.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On August 21, 2007, the planning commission held a public hearing to
review these requests. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent
notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak
and present written statements. The planning commission also
considered reports and recommendations of the city staff.
2. The city council reviewed this proposal and considered the planning
commission’s recommendation on September 10, 2007. The council also
considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and those in
attendance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approved
the above-described PUD revision based on plans date-stamped August 20,
2007 because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and
operated to be in conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and
Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the
surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or
methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental,
disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of
excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
Packet Page Number 86 of 138
4
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and
would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or
proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services,
including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water
and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or
services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site’s
natural and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
10. The proposed built-out density of the entire Legacy Village PUD will be
less than that originally approved by 26 units.
11. The affect on the sit itself should not cause an overcrowding problem
since the residents on the site would not generate the quantity of traffic a
typical multi-family development would.
12. The minimum floor-area requirement of 580 square feet was intended for
typical “efficiency” apartments. The proposed unit sizes should suffice in
this instance since they are for persons with limited mobility that need
medical assistance.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on September 10, 2007.
Seconded by Mayor Longrie. Ayes – Mayor Longrie, Councilmembers
Cave, Juenemann
Nays
Councilmember Cave
– Councilmembers Hjelle,
Rossbach
moved approval of a parking waiver to provide 100
underground and 45 on-grade parking spaces rather than the 300 required by
ordinance. Approval is because the proposed senior housing complex would not
generate the amount of traffic associated with typical multi-family uses. This
parking reduction of 155 spaces is subject to the requirements of city ordinance
should the use of the building be proposed for a change to a higher traffic-
Packet Page Number 87 of 138
5
generating use. The three parking spaces in the circular driveway area shall be
omitted. Staff shall work with the applicant to further reduce the surface parking
to maximize green space on the site. Staff shall also determine whether the
three surface parking stalls proposed in the turnaround area are feasible. If they
are not, they shall be omitted. (changes are in underlined and deletions are
stricken.)
Seconded by Mayor Longrie. Ayes - All
Mayor Longrie asked the applicant if the project would use union labor. The
applicant was unsure.
Councilmember Cave
• Enter into a cross-easement agreement with the city for the shared parking
spaces for the use of the city’s abutting sculpture park. This agreement shall
be prepared by the city attorney and shall require that the developer of the
senior complex be responsible for driveway maintenance and snowplowing.
This agreement shall be subject to the requirements of the director of public
works.
moved to approve the revised plans date-stamped August
20, 2007, for the Regent at Legacy Village. Approval is subject to the applicant
doing the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit
for this project.
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall revise the plans or do
the following for staff approval:
• Provide the city with cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the
exterior landscaping and site improvements.
• Meet all requirements of the engineering report by Jon Jarosch dated July 5,
2007.
• Meet all requirements of the fire marshal and building official.
• Provide engineered plans to the building official for all retaining walls that
exceed four feet in height as measured from the bottom of the footing. All
retaining walls that are four feet tall or taller shall have a protective fence or
guardrail on top.
Packet Page Number 88 of 138
6
• Provide a site and design plan for the screening of any trash and recycling
containers if they would be kept outside. Should a trash enclosure area be
proposed in the future, it shall not be placed in any parking space.
• Provide a screening plan for any exterior utility meters, if there would be
outside meters, subject to the requirements of the community design review
board.
• Provide sidewalks to the existing trails and public sidewalks as required by
the original PUD approval. The location of these sidewalks is dependent
upon the location of exits from the building.
3. Before getting a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall:
• Comply with or complete all aspects of these plans or any required revisions.
• Provide in-ground lawn irrigation as shown on the plans.
• Install traffic and address signs, subject to staff approval.
• Install wetland-protection buffer signs around the west side of the abutting
wetland area.
4. The community design review board shall review major changes to these
plans. Minor changes may be approved by staff.
5. The six Sculpture Park parking spaces shall be signed accordingly subject to
staff approval.
6.
Seconded by Mayor Longrie. Ayes - All
The horizontal-lap siding on the building exterior shall be the cementious
Hardi Board product. The proposed vinyl siding is not allowed.
Packet Page Number 89 of 138
7
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 90 of 138
MEMORANDUM
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Planner
Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review–Woodland Hills Church
LOCATION: 1740 Van Dyke Street
DATE: January 17, 2012
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit (CUP) for the temporary homeless shelter at Woodland Hills Church
is due for its annual review.
Last year, Woodland Hills Church, located at 1740 Van Dyke Street, requested the city council
revise its conditional use permit (CUP) to operate a temporary homeless shelter. The proposed
shelter is provided through Woodland Hills’ affiliation with Project Home, a program operated by
the St. Paul Area Council of Churches currently providing shelter at area churches for those in
need.
BACKGROUND
January 10, 2000: The city council approved a CUP for a church, a comprehensive land use
plan amendment from BC (business commercial) C (church) and amended the liquor license
requirements to exempt the 100-foot spacing requirement for churches from on-sale/off-sale
liquor establishments in instances where the liquor store was in operation before the church
entered the neighborhood. (Note: at the time of the 2030 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
adoption on January 25, 2010, the land use classification was changed from C to MU, mixed
use.)
February 1, 2001: The city council approved a one-year extension of Woodland Hill’s CUP in
order to check the progress of the church’s construction.
April 8, 2002: The city council approved a one-year extension of Woodland Hill’s CUP in order
to check the progress of the church’s construction.
June 9, 2003: The city council moved to review the CUP for Woodland Hills Church again only if
there are changes proposed to the CUP, there is an expansion to the facility or if a problem
arises.
January 24, 2011: The city council approved an amendment to the CUP for Woodland Hills
Church to permit a temporary homeless shelter twice a year. Each occasion would be for up to
a one month period—two months per year total.
Agenda Item G10
Packet Page Number 91 of 138
DISCUSSION
Woodland Hills Church had provided temporary shelter through Project Home on three one-
month occasions over a span of 1½ years prior to last year’s CUP amendment. Once learning
about this use, the community development staff contacted the church about the need for a CUP
amendment.
Since the city council approved the CUP amendment, staff is not aware of any issues or
concerns regarding the temporary homeless shelter. Staff recommends reviewing this CUP
again in one year.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit for Woodland Hills Church again in one year.
p:sec14\woodland hills church temporary homeless shelter CUP CC Review_012312
Attachments:
1. Zoning Map
2. City Council minutes, dated January 24, 2011
Packet Page Number 92 of 138
Packet Page Number 93 of 138
Attachment 2
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m., Monday, January 24, 2011
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 02-11
J. NEW BUSINESS
3. Conditional Use Permit Revision, Woodland Hills Church Request for a Temporary
Homeless Shelter, 1740 Van Dyke Street
a. Senior Planner, Tom Ekstrand gave the report and answered questions of the
council.
b. Planning Commissioner, Joe Boeser addressed the council.
c. St. Paul Council of Churches representative, Sara Eagle addressed the council.
d. Facilities Director of Woodland Hills Church, Troy Zambrano addressed the
council.
Councilmember Juenemann
moved to approve the conditional use permit revision for
Woodland Hills Church at 1740 Van Dyke Street to operate a temporary homeless
shelter two months each year and notifying the city when it will take place during the
year.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION
RESOLUTION 11-1-524
WHEREAS, Woodland Hills Church applied for a conditional use permit revision to operate
a temporary homeless shelter.
WHEREAS, Section 44-1092(3) of the city ordinances requires a conditional use permit for
churches and institutions of any educational, philanthropic and charitable nature.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at 1740 Van Dyke Street. The legal
description is:
PID # 14 29 22 33 0001
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On December 7, 2010, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff
published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners.
The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present
written statements. The planning commission also considered the report and
recommendation of city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city
council approve this permit.
2. On January10, 2011, the city council considered reports and recommendations of the
city staff and planning commission.
Packet Page Number 94 of 138
Attachment 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council passed the above-described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and this Code.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause no more than minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. Staff may approve
minor changes.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval
or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for
one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The temporary homeless shelter shall be limited to a period of two months each
year. The number of residents sheltered shall not exceed 20 persons at a time as
proposed.
5. Woodland Hills Church shall provide constant supervision when the temporary
shelter is in operation.
6. Woodland Hills Church shall comply with all requirements of the Maplewood Building
Official, Fire Marshal and Health Officer prior to beginning the operation of the
temporary shelter.
Packet Page Number 95 of 138
Attachment 2
7. Any changes in use or the operation of the temporary shelter or expansion of the
church shall require review by the city council.
8. Any plans for changes to the building exterior, other than painting or repairs, shall be
submitted to the community design review board, for review and approval.
9. The applicant shall notify city staff prior to operating the temporary shelter so the city
can assure compliance with the allowed two months per year of the homeless
shelter.
The Maplewood City Council passed this resolution on January 24, 2011.
Seconded by Councilmember Nephew. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
Packet Page Number 96 of 138
MEMORANDUM
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner
Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Planned Unit Development Review—Metro Transit Park and Ride
Parking Ramp
LOCATION: 1793 Beam Avenue
DATE: January 17, 2012
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Metro Transit Park and Ride Parking Ramp planned
unit development (PUD) is due for review. This PUD allowed Metro Transit, a division of the
Metropolitan Council, to build a three-level (a ground-floor level and two above-ground levels),
1,000-space parking ramp at the park and ride site located west of Sears at 1793 Beam
Avenue.
BACKGROUND
September 27, 2010: The city council approved the PUD for this project. The council also
approved a front setback reduction for the proposed parking ramp of 15 feet from the Southlawn
Drive right-of-way and a reduction in parking stall widths from 9 ½ feet to 8 ½ feet.
Refer to the attached conditions of approval (attached).
January 11, 2011: The community design review board approved the project design plans and
a comprehensive sign plan (attached).
DISCUSSION
The applicant is presently working on plans for a building permit submittal this spring. Staff
suggests review of this PUD again by September 27, 2012 at the anniversary of the initial
approval by the city council. If the applicant has not obtained a building permit by that time this
approval would expire, as required by ordinance.
The applicant needs to be aware that they still owe the city $26,396.18 for engineering review
costs incurred during the city’s review of this proposal. This was due to project review costs by
the city’s engineering staff as well as charges from the city’s consultant traffic engineer in
performing the evaluation of the traffic-impact analysis for this project.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit for the Metro Transit Park and Ride Parking Ramp planned
unit development, 1793 Beam Avenue, by September 27, 2012. If the applicant has not
obtained a building permit to start construction by that time, this approval shall expire as
required by ordinance. The engineering-review costs still owed by the applicant must be paid
prior to obtaining a building permit for the proposed parking ramp.
Agenda Item G11
Packet Page Number 97 of 138
2
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 4.41 acres
Existing Use: Metro Transit Park and Ride Facility
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Maplewood Mall parking lot
South: Beam Avenue and Chili’s
East: Maplewood Mall parking and the Maplewood Mall
West: Southlawn Drive, Olive Garden and McDonald’s
PLANNING
Land Use Plan: C (commercial)
Zoning: BC (business commercial)
p:sec2N\Park and Ride Parking Ramp annual PUD Review CC Report #2 1 12 te
Attachments:
1. Location/Zoning Map
2. Land Use Plan Map
3. Site Plan
4. City Council Conditions of approval dated September 27, 2010
5. Community Design Review Board approval dated January 11, 2011
Packet Page Number 98 of 138
Packet Page Number 99 of 138
Packet Page Number 100 of 138
Packet Page Number 101 of 138
Packet Page Number 102 of 138
Packet Page Number 103 of 138
Packet Page Number 104 of 138
Packet Page Number 105 of 138
Packet Page Number 106 of 138
Packet Page Number 107 of 138
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Antonen, City Manager
Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Larry Farr, Chief Building Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Annual Service Contracts, Contractor Yearly Accumulative
Expenses
DATE: January 23, 2012 City Council Meeting
INTRODUCTION
The annual service contracts for the Maplewood Community Centers, Simplex Fire System Monitoring
Equipment, Thermo/Dyne Aquatic Area Heating and Cooling unit, and Trane Heating Ventilation/Air
Conditioning (HVAC) equipment are due for approval. Staff uses electrical contractors for multiple
projects for the city which we are now presenting to combine planned expenses under one approval.
BACKGROUND
City staff uses outside contractors, vendors and service companies to compliment the work being done
by Building Operations and Building Maintenance on equipment. This helps to ensure that equipment is
functioning properly and to help reduce unexpected system failures. We are also using electric
contractors to do various projects for the city that vary in expense amounts but accumulatively exceed
the amount requiring council approval.
DISCUSSION
Building Operations and Building Maintenance use many service companies and contractors
throughout the year which in the past were not brought to the council’s attention either due to the
expense being under the required council approval amount or they were reoccurring agreements that
were processed. We are now bringing these items to your attentions as renewals occur or approvals
are processed. Included with this are electrical contractors usage as the yearly expense combined or
single project amounts do exceed the council approval dollar amount thus reducing the number of times
needing approval with a limited annual amount. This will allow you to become aware of what types of
businesses or services are used annually to help supplement the current Building Operations and
Building Maintenance (MCC) staff’s work load. This year’s projects include campus parking lot and
walking trail light poles replacement with raised bases, MCC pool area lighting lamps and ballasts,
parking lot and walking trail existing lights bulbs and ballasts, public works garage doors emergency
power adaptors, Nature Center parking lot light pole and base replacement, Public Works new area
garage light fixtures to cords with plugs for maintenance work, and unforeseen work.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is requesting city council approval for signing and paying the service contracts which are budgeted
to 602-614-000-4430 (Repair and Maintenance of Equipment) for Thermo/Dyne (Pool Area Heating-
Cooling) $3,400, Simplex Grinnell (Fire System Equipment) $5,495, and Trane Company Two (2) year
contract (Heating/Cooling/Air Conditioning) (2012) $9,984, (2013) $10,798. Staff is also requesting
approval for spending accumulative expenses over $10,000 but limited to $70,000 for electrical
contractor work in 2012 before requiring additional approval. The electrical work expense would come
from the general ledgers of Building Operations 101-115 or Building Maintenance (MCC) 602-614.
Attachments: Service Contracts for Thermo/Dyne Inc., Simplex Grinnell, Trane Co.
Agenda Item G12
Packet Page Number 108 of 138
Agenda Item G12 Attachments
Packet Page Number 109 of 138
Agenda Item G12 Attachments
Packet Page Number 110 of 138
Agenda Item G12 Attachments
Packet Page Number 111 of 138
Agenda Item G12 Attachments
Packet Page Number 112 of 138
Agenda Item G12 Attachments
Packet Page Number 113 of 138
Agenda Item G12 Attachments
Packet Page Number 114 of 138
Agenda Item G12 Attachments
Packet Page Number 115 of 138
Agenda Item G12 Attachments
Packet Page Number 116 of 138
AGENDA NO. G13
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Consider Approval to Pay Invoice from League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust for Services Rendered
DATE: January 17, 2012
INTRODUCTION/ BACKGROUND
As part of the litigation on the Gearin Property [Wipers] the defense of claims against the City of
Maplewood was provided by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust [LMCIT]. The
settlement of that litigation was covered by LMCIT at no cost to the City of Maplewood. The
LMCIT did not provide litigation coverage or settlement coverage for City Prosecutor Alan
Kantrud. Due to this exclusion, because Mr. Kantrud was conducting duties as a Maplewood
representative, he was provided separate legal representation from July 2010 to August 2011.
The cost of the representation for Mr. Kantrud was $51,315.94. Discussions with the LMCIT
determined that $7,216.96 was a separate category covered by LMCIT; as well as a $468.00
unrelated expense. Thus, the final amended amount due to LMCIT is $43,630.98. As part of
the settlement discussions, Mr. Kantrud agreed to pay $1,000.00 toward the settlement, thus the
Maplewood share due to LMCIT is $42,630.90.
The City has maintained a Legal Contingency Fund for the purposes of covering litigation and
claims expenses. The 2012 Budget document notes that the Legal Contingency Fund has been
replaced with an internal service fund called the Risk Management Fund. Adequate funds are
available in the Risk Management Fund to cover this expense, as the Council approved a
contribution of $60,000 toward this expense before settlement of the Wipers litigation was
completed.
This item requires Council approval because the expenditure exceeds the $10,000 limit by the
Council and is brought forward for Council approval.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the payment of $43,630.90 to the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust and the invoicing of $1,000.00 to Alan Kantrud to cover a
portion of this expense, with payment of expenses from the Risk Management Fund.
Packet Page Number 117 of 138
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Packet Page Number 118 of 138
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Michael Thompson, City Engineer/ Dep. Public Works Director
Steven Love, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Bartelmy-Meyer Area Street Improvements, City Project 11-14, City Project
11-14, Resolution Accepting Feasibility Study, Authorizing Preparation of
Plans and Specifications and Calling for Public Hearing
DATE: January 17, 2012
INTRODUCTION
The feasibility study for the Bartelmy-Meyer Street Improvements, City Project 11-14, is complete and
available in the office of the city engineer. Copies will be distributed to council members prior to the
meeting and also available in council chambers. The study includes information on the proposed
improvements, costs, and proposed financing. An executive summary of the feasibility study is
attached to this report. The city council will consider accepting the feasibility study, authorizing the
preparation of plans and specifications, and ordering a public hearing to be held on February 13, 2012.
BACKGROUND
It is important that the city maintains its infrastructure valued at a little under $200 million. This project
is proposed to meet set goals of the council, as identified in the adopted budget, to attain a pavement
condition index rating of 70 out of 100 for 75% of the 135 miles of local streets. Currently 65% of the
local streets are rated at 70 or higher, 10% shy of the set goal. In order to meet this goal the Public
Works department has been averaging approximately 4 miles of road per year of road reconstruction.
With the recent reduction of funded Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) reconstruction projects in 2012 the
proposed CIP project calls for the full reconstruction of approximately 1.3 miles of roadway (see
attached 2012-2016 CIP). The city’s street reconstruction program began in 1999 and many
neighborhoods have seen investment through this program. Post construction surveys have been
incorporated into these projects and residents have been very favorable to the neighborhood
investment. The reconstruction program is also the best opportunity to reduce the volume of
stormwater runoff and pollutants before reaching lakes and wetlands. The city is required to do this as
part of the NPDES MS4 Permit requirements mandated through the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency under the Clean Water Act.
The proposed project area can be seen on the attached project location map and is generally located
east of Stillwater Road, north of Minnehaha Avenue East, west of Sterling Street, and south of
Stillwater Road.
The feasibility report was ordered at the June 27, 2011 city council meeting. Subsequently a letter and
information packet were mailed to the residents on July 27, 2010 to provide information on the council’s
action and to inform them that preliminary engineering, such as soil borings and a topographic survey,
would begin within the neighborhood. The information packet contained an article discussing the city’s
street reconstruction program, an article providing information about Special Assessments, a rain
garden pamphlet, a driveway reconstruction program pamphlet, a questionnaire, and information about
the questionnaire. Response questionnaires mailed back to the city by residents along with a summary
of written comments are attached to this report.
Agenda Item J1
Packet Page Number 119 of 138
An informational neighborhood meeting was held on September 29, 2011 from 5:30-7:30 P.M. at the
Maplewood Community Center. Approximately 26 residents attended the informational meeting. Staff
gave a presentation about the project and what a standard street reconstruction project entails. The
presentation included the public improvement process, the construction process, existing conditions,
proposed improvements, proposed assessments, and an estimated project timeline.
After the presentation residents asked questions, expressed concerns, and gave input about the
project. Staff opened up the meeting for a brainstorming session to get ideas from residents about how
a Maplewood street project could resolve some long-standing issues in their neighborhood. Staff made
themselves available to discuss the project one-on-one after the general question and answer period of
the presentation. Based on discussion with the residents they were concerned with the cost of the
proposed assessment. Items that residents brought up and felt needed to be improved in the
neighborhood included the park equipment at Gethsemane Park, reduction of traffic speed through the
neighborhood, localized drainage issues, and there was discussion about on which street the proposed
sidewalk should be located. Following the meetings, staff made themselves available via phone, email,
and meetings with the residents to discuss the proposed improvements.
Following the September 29th meeting City Staff and the City’s consultant began to review the
comments received at the meeting and evaluate possible design opportunities to address these
concerns. Typically design options for addressing traffic speeds on local streets include bump outs at
intersections and narrowing of road ways. Localized drainage issues are normally solved by upgrading
the storm sewer system and installing rain gardens. Staff met with the City’s parks department to
discuss ways in which we could work together to include the park upgrades as part of the street
reconstruction project. Staff also began reviewing possible locations for additional sidewalks.
Shortly after the above review process started the City was approached by the Ramsey Washington
Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) regarding a very unique one-time grant opportunity. This grant
would allow the City and the Watershed to partner together on a neighborhood improvement project.
The grant is comprised of funds from the Clean Water Fund Grant and RWMWD. The following are the
four major goals of the grant:
Improve water quality/reduce storm water runoff
Improve pedestrian/bike safety
Reduce traffic speeds
Enhancement of the Urban Forest
The design concept for the grant, often referred to as the “Living Streets Concept”, achieves these four
goals by first narrowing the roadway to reduce the impervious surface (see attached Street Layout –
Concept). This reduces the storm water runoff, helps improve the water quality, reduces traffic speeds,
and has the added advantage of cutting down on long term maintenance costs of the road way. The
extra boulevard area provides additional area to install low maintenance rain gardens to further improve
water quality and reduce the storm water runoff. Sidewalks are installed along one side of all streets to
promote pedestrian safety. Boulevard trees will be planted to enhance the urban forest.
In reviewing this grant opportunity staff found that many of the design options that were being reviewed
to address the items brought up at the September 29th meeting fell in line with the goals and design
concepts of the grant. City Staff, the City’s consultant, and RWMWD began evaluating and preparing a
plan using the grant’s design concept in order to set up another neighborhood meeting.
Agenda Item J1
Packet Page Number 120 of 138
A second informational neighborhood meeting was held on November 15, 2011 from 5:30-7:30 P.M. at
the Maplewood Community Center. Approximately 22 residents attended the informational meeting.
Staff presented the revised concept layout that included information about the grant opportunity, the
proposed layout, and how the layout addressed the concerns brought up at the September 29th
neighborhood meeting.
After the presentation residents asked questions, expressed concerns, and gave input about the
project. The concept was generally well received while the installation of neighborhood sidewalks was
met with mixed feelings by parties on both sides of the idea. Some residents were worried about the
increased cost sidewalks could have on the project/assessments, having to maintain sidewalks during
the winter, and the perceived loss of property. While others were favorable to having a dedicated
location to walk off of the street.
On November 17, 2011 staff met with the local Girl Scout Troop 53521 at Gethsemane Lutheran
Elementary School to discuss the proposed Bartelmy Meyer Area Street improvement project. Girl
Scout Troop 53521 has been very involved with improving pedestrian facilities within the school zone
area. A summary of the meeting was included as an FYI article and is attached to the agenda report.
An additional neighborhood meeting is planned prior to the Public Hearing at which staff will be
available to the residents to answer questions about the proposed project design, the construction
process, and assessments.
Staff brought the project design concept before the Community Design Review Board, the Parks and
Recreation Commission, the Environmental and Natural Resources Commission, and the Planning
Commission. Staff presented the design concept, showed how the design addressed concerns of
residents, answered questions, and solicited feed back from the various commissions. Overall the
commissions were very supportive of the proposed design and how the project also met Livable/Living
Streets goals and design concepts for the Bartelmy Meyer Area Street Improvement project.
DISCUSSION
The neighborhood improvement project generally consists of the following streets: Bartelmy Lane,
Brand Avenue, Mary Street, Meyer Street, and 7th Street (east of Bartelmy Lane). Street and utility
improvements for all of the above listed streets were planned for 2012 reflecting the council’s
previous adoption of the 2012-2016 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
Staff is proposing to add 7th Street (west of Bartelmy Lane) and Sterling Street to the project. 7th
Street (west of Bartelmy Lane) and the Sterling Street are currently in use and maintained by city
forces. These additional roadways are in need of repair and will allow for a complete neighborhood
reconstruction design and would represent a cost savings over reconstructing them as standalone
projects.
Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) owns and operates the water mains within the
Bartelmy-Meyer neighborhood. SPRWS has identified that the majority of the water main in this area
is cast iron pipe installed in the 1960’s and is in need of replacement. SPRWS has agreed to replace
the approximately 8,000 L.F. of cast iron pipe with new 8” ductile iron pipe.
Staff is proposing to add the Gethsemane Park Improvements to the scope of the project. The park
equipment was installed in 1985 and currently consists of a slide and a metal gym (see attached park
photos). The playground equipment at Gethsemane Park is outdated and in need of improvement.
This issue was brought up by residents at the neighborhood meetings. Staff believes that by
Agenda Item J1
Packet Page Number 121 of 138
incorporating this into the project as a bid alternate it will provide the opportunity for a much needed
neighborhood improvement.
Staff is proposing to add the construction of a concrete sidewalk along the north side of Cope Avenue
from White Bear Avenue to Hazelwood Street to this project. Several unconnected segments of
sidewalk exist within the City and in this case along the north side of Cope Avenue in front of the local
businesses. This sidewalk will provide a connection to the north/south sidewalk located on the east
side of Hazelwood Street to the north/south sidewalk along the west side of White Bear Avenue. The
sidewalk will also provide pedestrian access to the businesses located on the north side of Cope
Avenue and is located just north of a bus stop on White Bear Avenue. Staff has received a number of
requests for a sidewalk along Cope Avenue from White Bear Avenue in the past. This addition to the
project scope will be added as a bid alternate, which later allows flexibility in the work that is awarded.
Staff is also proposing to add the installation of fiber optic lines along Beam Avenue from Southlawn
Drive to Fire Station 3 located on County Road C and along East 7th Street from Century Avenue to
the Maplewood Nature Center. Staff has been building a network of fiber optic lines with the goal of
securing a reliable, high-speed system between various city facilities. This work will utilize existing
vaults owned by North St. Paul to reduce installation costs and will also be added as a bid alternate to
the project.
The following is a summary of the proposed improvements to the neighborhood streets. All of the
streets in the proposed project area do not have concrete curb and gutter. New concrete curb and
gutter would be installed along all of the neighborhood streets. The full roadway throughout the
neighborhood will need to be removed and replaced as part of the street reconstruction due to lack of
an adequate existing road cross-section and deteriorating pavement condition. The majority of the
existing neighborhood streets are currently constructed without the necessary aggregate base to
provide a firm base to support the bituminous section of the road. Poor subgrade soils will need to be
removed and replaced with a granular material to allow proper subsurface drainage in order to prevent
frost heaving.
The neighborhood street widths range from 24 to 30 feet wide. The streets are proposed to be
constructed at 24 feet wide with parking restricted on the opposite side from the walk. Parking bays on
Bartelmy Lane adjacent to the Gethsemane Park are proposed to add additional parking adjacent to the
park. Sidewalks are proposed on one side of all neighborhood streets to promote pedestrian safety.
The sidewalk will connect into the newly constructed trail along Stillwater Road at the north end of the
project and provide pedestrian access to the local school, park, the Maplewood Nature Center property,
and the trail running along Minnehaha Avenue. The sidewalk along Bartelmy Lane north of 7th Street
will be maintained by the city and the residential walks on and south of 7th Street will be maintained by
the residents during the winter for snow removal. The City will assist with a transition period over the
first couple of years. Typically the City only plows sidewalk along major collector roadways.
Limited storm sewer is present within the project area. An expansion of the existing system is a major
part of the proposed improvements to relieve drainage issues, reduce street ponding problems, and
reduce the amount of storm water runoff in the roadway section. The majority of the existing system
was found to be in need of replacement as part of the proposed project.
Currently there are no water quality treatment practices in the project area. Proposed treatment
features such as a regional rainwater garden and boulevard rainwater gardens will provide the means
to capture and reduce pollutants from reaching downstream water bodies. Staff will be working with
RWMWD and the residents on the location and design of the rainwater gardens.
Agenda Item J1
Packet Page Number 122 of 138
The city’s sewer superintendent has noted that this neighborhood’s sanitary sewer system has a history
of root intrusion, structural deficiencies, and has identified need for spot repairs to the main line, main
lining, and manhole reconstruction. Additionally the city will pay for a free sewer service
cleaning/televising for homeowners; and any deficiencies found within the right of way would be paid for
by the city during the project. The city’s sewer superintendent has also identified several main lines
outside of the project area that are in need of lining that are proposed to be added to scope of the
project as a bid alternate.
BUDGET
The total project cost as identified through the feasibility process is $4,157,000.
FUNDING SOURCE
FEASIBILITY
ESTIMATE
RWMWD GRANT FUND $907,000
G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS $1,401,390
SPECIAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS $733,610
SANITARY SEWER FUND $140,000
W.A.C. FUND $50,000
ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITY FUND $175,000
PARK FUND $20,000
ST. PAUL WATER $700,000
DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT PROGRAM $30,000
TOTAL FUNDING $4,157,000
FEASIBILITY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST RECOVERY
The increased project cost, as mentioned above, is in part due to additional water main work proposed
by SPRWS; however SPRWS would reimburse the city for the work associated with the replacement of
main and extensions. This is reflected in the additional contribution by SPRWS to the project financing
plan. Additionally the scope of the project has been increased with the inclusion of the additional two
streets, increase in storm sewer work, and the addition of bid alternates (i.e…Cope Sidewalk and Fiber
Optic extension).
It should be noted that $710,000.00 of the proposed $1,401,390 in identified G.O. Improvement Bond
funding will be transferred from other past projects that have seen a savings, thus reducing the new
bonding requirement to $691,390.00.
It is important to note that a major funding source reflects the RWMWD Grant Fund which was originally
to be used in a neighboring city, but that project did not move forward. This grant is a significant benefit
to the city.
The Living Streets design concept represents a cheaper alternative when comparing estimated costs to
a standard design. The Living Streets design represents an approximate upfront savings of $100,000
when looking at the change in street and storm costs. The added advantage of the Living Streets
design from a budgetary standpoint will be the continued cost savings over the life of the road with
reduced costs in maintenance, seal-coating/mill and overlay projects, and when the road surface
requires replacement. This is all in addition to the benefits of slowing traffic, providing a safe route for
pedestrians, and enhancing stormwater quality and the urban forest.
With the understanding of holding to debt levels resulting from the approved 5-year CIP the
intent is to design this project with a number of bid alternate options which could reduce the
Agenda Item J1
Packet Page Number 123 of 138
scope of improvements; such as eliminating Fiber Optic Improvements and/or scaling back the
extent of the Cope Avenue sidewalk improvements. In essence, this would allow the bids to be
received and the city can choose the design based on the cost it is comfortable with in order to
proceed.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution accepting the feasibility report,
authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications, and calling for a public hearing for 7:00 p.m.,
Monday, February 13, 2012, for the Bartelmy Meyer Area Street Improvements, City Project 11-14.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Executive Summary
3. Questionnaire Results
4. Location Map
5. 2012-2016 CIP Bartelmy Meyer Area Streets
6. FYI Girl Scout Meeting
7. Living Streets Design Concept
8. Existing Park Photos
Agenda Item J1
Packet Page Number 124 of 138
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the council adopted June 27, 2011, a report has
been prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of Bartelmy
Meyer Area Street Improvements, City Project 11-14, and this report was received by the
council on January 23, 2012, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost-effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the Bartelmy Meyer Area Street Improvements, City
Project 11-14 in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a
portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an
estimated total cost of the improvement of $4,157,000.
2. The City’s consultant engineer, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., is the
designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and
specifications for the making of said improvement.
3. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers
necessary for the preparation of plans and specifications. A proposed budget of $4,157,000
shall be established. The proposed financing plan is as follows:
FUNDING SOURCE
FEASIBILITY
ESTIMATE
RWMWD GRANT FUND $907,000
G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS*$1,401,390
SPECIAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS $733,610
SANITARY SEWER FUND $140,000
W.A.C. FUND $50,000
ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITY FUND $175,000
PARK FUND $20,000
ST. PAUL WATER $700,000
DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT PROGRAM $30,000
TOTAL FUNDING $4,157,000
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST RECOVERY
*Note: Includes G.O. Improvement Bond funding in the amount of $710,000.00 from Fund
510 from previous project, which reduces bonding obligations to $691,390.00.
4. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 13th day of
February, 2012 in the council chambers of city hall at 7:00 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed
and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
Approved this 23th day of January 2012
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 125 of 138
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
BARTELMY-MEYER AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS
MAPLEWOOD CITY PROJECT 11-14
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Feasibility Study and Report has been prepared for the Bartelmy-Meyer Area Street
Improvements, Maplewood City Project 11-14. The proposed project includes the
following improvements:
● Full reconstruction of the following streets to include removal and replacement of
existing bituminous pavement, concrete curb and gutter construction, and
subgrade correction as necessary.
o Brand Street
o 7th Street
o Meyer Street
o Mary Street
o Sterling Street
o Bartelmy Lane
● 7th Street and Sterling Street have been added to the project scope as these
roadways are in need of repair and will allow for a complete neighborhood
reconstruction design.
● Sidewalk construction throughout the project area on one side of each roadway.
● Storm sewer and other storm water best management practices (BMPs) for runoff
quantity and quality control. Storm sewer improvements are proposed to include
catch basins and storm sewer pipe as needed in addition to existing storm sewer
facilities. Existing storm sewer structures and pipe that are damaged or over
capacity are proposed to be replaced as necessary. The construction of rainwater
gardens and other storm water BMPs will be necessary to meet watershed and city
infiltration requirements.
● Sanitary sewer repair as deemed necessary through televising and manhole
condition assessments. Properties not currently serviced by sanitary sewer or
properties which may be subdivided in the future will require additional sanitary
service to be constructed as a part of this project.
● Cured in-place pipe (CIPP) sanitary sewer lining improvements outside the
project limits as identified by the City’s Utility/Fleet Superintendent.
● Replacement of all cast iron water main pipe within the project area. SPRWS has
identified approximately 8,000 feet of water main replacement.
● Replacement of the playground equipment at Gethsemane Park.
● Sidewalk construction along Cope Avenue from White Bear Avenue to
Hazelwood Street.
● Fiber optic improvements in two locations outside of the project area to enhance
the city’s existing fiber optic communication system between city facilities.
The estimated costs for the proposed improvements are detailed below. These costs
include a 10% construction cost contingency and a 25% allowance for indirect costs.
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 126 of 138
Proposed Improvement Estimated Cost
Street Improvements $ 2,259,000
Storm Sewer Improvements $ 599,000
Sanitary Sewer Improvements $ 140,000
Watermain Improvements $ 750,000
Driveway Replacement Program $ 30,000
Gesthemane Park Improvements $ 100,000
Cope Avenue Sidewalk Improvements $ 179,000
Fiber Optic Improvements $ 100,000
Total Project Cost $ 4,157,000
The improvements are proposed to be financed through a combination of special
assessments to benefiting properties, RWMWD grant funds, WAC funds, SPRWS funds
and other City of Maplewood funds. The following is a summary of the estimated
funding amounts from each of the proposed financing sources:
Financing Source Amount
RWMWD Grant Fund $ 907,000
G.O. Improvement Fund $ 1,401,390
Special Assessments $ 733,610
Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund $ 140,000
WAC Funds $ 50,000
Environmental Utility Fund $ 175,000
Park Fund $ 20,000
SPRWS Funds $ 700,000
Maplewood Driveway Replacement Program $ 30,000
Total $ 4,157,000
The following is the proposed project schedule for the project if the City Council votes to
proceed:
Maplewood City Council Receives Feasibility Report, January 23, 2012
Calls Public Hearing, and Authorizes Preparation
of Plans and Specifications
Maplewood Public Hearing February 13, 2012
Maplewood City Council Approves Plans and March 26, 2012
Specifications, and Authorizes Ad for Bids
Bid Opening May 4, 2012
Maplewood Assessment Hearing and City Council May 14, 2012
Awards Contract
Start Construction May 2012
Construction Complete September 2012
Based upon the analysis completed as a part of this report, the proposed Bartelmy-Meyer
Area Street Improvements, Maplewood City Project 11-14, are feasible, necessary, and
cost effective, and would benefit the City of Maplewood.
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 127 of 138
Bartelmy Meyer Area Street Improvements, City Project 11-14Questionnaire SummaryStreetYears @ AddressSanitary Issue Require Regular Cleaning CommentTelevised ?Drainage IssueWhenStanding WaterCommentDirect FloodingCommentRain GardenSizeLocationDriveway ProgramGeneral CommentsAbel St. 32 years n nn/annnnn/annN/AAbel St. 9 years n nnnnn/ann/aRental PropertyAbel St. 54 years n nThere is nothing wrong with our street!nnnnn/annAgain, there is nothing wrong with our street .I have talked to neighbors who have said they also have no problems.Abel St. 45 years n nnnnnnnN/AAdolphus St. 35 years n nn/annn/ann/an n/a n/a nAdolphus St. 41 years n nnyIn the spring-during snow meltnThis happens maybe every 4-5 years nny1. Drainage coming from southwest of our property into our garage. 2. Cars parked in street over night contrary to law 3. Ditch on northedge of property along roselawn ,any needfor this?Agate St. 52 years y y/once a yearDrain pipe's water backs up onto basement floor n n n n n/a n yThe south west intersection of Agate St. & Oak Crest Curve has a visability obstructed due to it interseting at a 45 degree angle ,plus a large pine tree on south corner and 7 foot high bushes running 30 feet in the North and East directions. A stop sign on Agate is needed,do to fast traffic on Agate st . >30mphAgate St. 38 years y n/a In 2001, I had yard dug up new sewer line installed before that I had problems every year since 1972,In 2001inspector came out to inspect new sewer line ,he would not let them install it all the way to the street. The water dept broke my sewer line when they where fixing a water leak in the street.They patched it together ,maybe this needs to be checked.nn y 1 day ,(10 feet) ,water comes from the slope north in drivewayn/a n/a y 8*16by the boulevard treemaybe/ quoteProblem with Northwest neighbors fence(flower box structure) moving into our yard ,causing drainage issues. Also watching city council meetings,they mentioned that we would pay for new water lines .The area in front of my house has had 3 major water line breaks . I believe that St. Paul Water line is in poor shape on the hill.Agate St. 50 years y yMain sewer line plug,In 2002 I replaced the main sewer pipes to the property line. It still is having problems under Agate St. The total cost was about $ 2000.00 n/a yAfter big rain stormsnyCemented the window well ,but still seepage.y 12*24yI heard the cost is $7000.00 & the interest rate is 9% for installments .I think this is way to high -both amount & int.rate.Agate St. 42 years yabout every 1 1/2 yearstree roots- toilet paper getting stuck in themnnnnn/anynoise-lots of busses-school-loud car mufflers,large trucks when they don't want to stop at the stop signs at larpenteur Agate St. 46 years y yroots city service at prop line / 9to 12 months- last service 8/18/2010nnn/ann/an/anN/AAgate St. 51 years n ywater comes up from the floor every 4 yearsnnnnn/annPut driveway back like it was before.I have lawn service on Mondays.Agate St. 19+ years y nback up in laundry room floor drain 2-3 times 651-489-8904n n/aAfter big rain stormsyless than hr /between our house and neighbors house / North side of house ny n/aopen to suggestions from you on size and location,We have a corner lot.nN/AAgate St.4 monthsnnnnn?y 8*16 n/a nN/AAgate St. 18 years n n/aHad to have line cleaned out from house to street in 1992 ,maybe one other time.n sometimes after big rain storms/After almost any rain or melting event n/an/amaybe 10*20maybeYes . I own my own auto repair shop In St. Paul.So I pay $14,000 a year in property tax and you let these people fix cars ,paint cars in there garage's(they make money) 10 cars in driveways,lot's of people living in houses .This nieborhood use to be so good .Do something about this (complaned before) ( 1772 Agate St. is one) All over nieborhood.Agate St. 32 years n nn/annnnn/annTHIS IS NOT NECESSARY AND A WASTE OF MONEY!Agate St. 52 years n nn/annnnn/annTake a good look - Our street is fine ,we do not need a new street -maybe resurface.Too much money for something we now have.Agate St. 20 years n nn/annnnn/ay 10*20Corner of Agate nN/AAgate St. 5 years n nnnnnnyN/AAgate St. 43 years n nn/annnnn/annN/AAgenda Item J1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 128 of 138
Bartelmy Meyer Area Street Improvements, City Project 11-14Questionnaire SummaryStreetYears @ AddressSanitary Issue Require Regular Cleaning CommentTelevised ?Drainage IssueWhenStanding WaterCommentDirect FloodingCommentRain GardenSizeLocationDriveway ProgramGeneral CommentsAgate St. 30 years y yTree roots 12 to 18 mo /sometimes longer n/a n n n y 8*16 front yard n/a N/AAgate St. 3 years n n n/a yAfter big rain stormnThe water seeps through the basement walkout door. The cement fondation next to a sewer drainage is off alignment . It sits lower ,so water settles and comes into the basement durring heavy rains.n y 10*20 by driveway y NoneAgate St. 17 years y yMain drain back up- I had to snake it .n n n n/a n/a y8*16/10*20/12*24nKeep the bus company on Rice St. from using Agate St. as a shortcut and our streets won't be in this bad of shape .Agate St. 27 years n n n/a yAfter big rain stormnGrade slants towards houseyAfter big rain-caused by grasde -gutters added to house -solved problem unless heavy rain & northerly wind.y 8*16 fornt yard n N/AAgate St. 42 years n nYes,Cities main line backed up into basementn y n/a n yWhen neighbors gutter overflows into basement n y N/AAgate St. 45 years n yBack up in basement drain.Cleaned to street nn n n n nBeaumont St. 18 years n n n/a n n n n n N/ABeaumont St. 38 years n/a n/aslow draining upstairs/basement bathtub/bathroom sinks/kitchen sink/every 3 months use shop vac to blow out drains in drain cleaner n/a n nrain poors onto driveway as bituminous curb wears away ,ice builds up at end of driveway as snow melts and drains into drivewayny 12*24 n/a nAbove ground power lines in the back yard -frequnently (burn out) transformers ,people speed southbound on Beaumont (children on street)& ?????????? in the ditch @ Fenton /Beaumont St.Beaumont St. 10 years n nnnn/an/anyN/ABeaumont St. n/a n/a n/an n/an/an/an/an/aAre there any programs for low income people like myself. Struggling like others ,so I can get new gutters for house? They are real bad.Please let me know.Thank you.Beaumont St.May 12,2010n nn/annnnn/ay8*16 or 10*20Two on either side of our walkway ,MN prairie garden would be nice.nN/ABeaumont St. 3 years n nnnnnnyN/ABeaumont St. 38 years n nn/annnnn/annSome people are on fixed incomes,I do not need extra bills= Thank youBeaumont St. 40 years n nnnnnnnN/ABeaumont St. 12 years n nnnnnnyThis is horrible and NOT necessary!WASTE OF OUR MONEY.It is a rental home & I will not put more money into it as it can't sell as it is w/ the location .Our money should go to cleaning up the saftey & crime,not a road that doesn't need repair!Bellwood Ave. E 38 years n nnnnnnyLarge trucks /Preceived speeding problems .Bellwood Ave. E.32 years n nn/a yAfter big rain storm nyAfter a big storm ,we put up new guttersnnN/ABellwood Ave. E.20 years n nn/a nnyChange the slope of the driveway away from the house on the west side.nyN/ABellwood Ave. E.56 years n nn/annnnn/annN/ABellwood Ave. E.42 years n nn/annnnn/an/anN/ABellwood Ave. E.6 years y yThe main line was blocked between house & street about 2 years agon/a yAfter big rain sorms n n n y N/A
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 129 of 138
Bartelmy Meyer Area Street Improvements, City Project 11-14Questionnaire SummaryStreetYears @ AddressSanitary Issue Require Regular Cleaning CommentTelevised ?Drainage IssueWhenStanding WaterCommentDirect FloodingCommentRain GardenSizeLocationDriveway ProgramGeneral CommentsBellwood Ave. E.1 year y y roots in the sewer pipes nnnnn/ay 12*24 I am not picky nN/ABellwood Ave. E.51 years n y2008 ,I had standard water control system, inc...n y n/a nDid have water ,but it has been corrected with ,standard water y n/a y 8*16next to mailbox going toward the driveway.nTake blvd tree out,add more street lights.New mail box(I like the white mail box and 1 post,pictured shown in pamplet of rain garden.Bellwood Ave. E.50+ years n n trees roots 7-8-09 n nwindow usually from heavy rain.n y nothing n n N/ABellwood Ave. E.55 years n nn/any/water in basementAfter big rain stormsnnn/anyN/ABellwood Ave. E.31 years n nThe sewer line going to the street was replaced at the street last year. Line had collasped.We do have roots in the line. No problem until last year.No problem after line was replaced.nnnnnnJust replaced the driveway ,driveway was put in with the ability to remove the end just incase the street was redone.Bellwood Ave. E.48 years n nnrarely and very littleAfter big rain stormsnny 8*16 n/a nN/ABellwood Ave. E.45 years n nnnnnn/annN/ABellwood Ave. E.32 years y n/aTree rootsn/a nnnnn/aN/ABellwood Ave. E.54 years y yslow draining/ work done, auger floor drainn n n n n/a n n/a N/ABellwood Ave. E.10 years n nn/anyAfter big rain stormsnnn/annN/ABellwood Ave. E.54 years n nny-once in a while After big rain stormsn/aFound a crack in foundation .Had a contractor out and it was fixedn?nAt the bottom of our driveway,level out the street so the rain does not stand there.Bellwood Ave. E.56 years n n n n n yes/no n/a ny/would like est.Too many different garbage companies - some come down the street more than once.This must take it's toll on wearing the street ,pot holes,ect…Bellwood Ave. 30 years n n n n n no n n n N/ABrand 9 no no yesafter big rain stormsno yes 12x24 yesRaingarden at the dead-end 12x24 is acceptable in additionto one on our property. BrandBush 13 yes yesrequire cleaning due to the roots every 6 monthsyesafter big stormsno no yes 12x24 noCity Heights Dr. 38 years y y Tree roots ,tree removed I will have to go through my records to see what I have - This will take some time nyAtter big rain storm nyYears ago - 1 time had yard redone so incline changed away from windows y 12*24?-along the front y N/ACity Heights Dr. 4 years n n n yAfter big rain stormsn n n/a n n N/ACity Heights Dr. 22 years n n Blocked drain -roots in pipe n/a sometimes After big rain stormsncouple days.Water stands at end of drivewayn n/a nI cannot afford a $8000.00 assesment .I think generally the streets are in fine shape .With the exception of Summer & Kingston between City Heights & Jackson are a mess! These area's should be redone.City Heights Dr. n/a n n n n n n n/a y N/ACity Heights Dr. 16 years n nonly need sewer drains cleans 2 times for tree roots nyAfter big rain stormsn n n n N/ACity Heights Dr. n/a n n n n n n n N/ACity Heights Dr.18 years n n n n n n n n N/ACity Heights Dr. 3 years n n n n n/a n/a y 8*16south side of mailboxes y N/ACity Heights Dr. 20 years y yTree roots every 5 years ,651489-2481n/a n n n n n N/A
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 130 of 138
Bartelmy Meyer Area Street Improvements, City Project 11-14Questionnaire SummaryStreetYears @ AddressSanitary Issue Require Regular Cleaning CommentTelevised ?Drainage IssueWhenStanding WaterCommentDirect FloodingCommentRain GardenSizeLocationDriveway ProgramGeneral CommentsCity Heights Dr. 16+ years n nnnnnnnN/ACity Heights 12 years n nnnnnnyN/AGurney St. 12 years y yEvery 1-2 years we have had to have someone come in clean out roots n/a n/anBecause of working on landscape & raingutters have for past 8-10 years ,kept moisture down to virtually none.ny 12*24Currently our entire front yard is a garden ,we will redo ours to match yours.yIntersection visibility,possible street lights, Also fill in the current drainage ditch.The drainage is a big issue because it all drains right in front of my driveway.Winter when ice & snow build up I wind up with a virtual lake in my driveway after storm sewer & curb should be elevated.Would like to see the Larpenteur/Gurney intersection made into a cul da sac. (sp?)Gurney St. 32 years n nPrior to 1990 I used to have fairly regular backups.But now all the offending trees are gone.nyAfter big rain storm nny 8*16 n/ayN/AGurney St. 36 years n nnnnny 8*16 n/ayI noticed that the street improvement does not include Gurney from Kingston the Water Work or Sylun alley which has standing water problems -why not include these two items in the improvement project.Kingston Ave. 28 years n ymain line from house to street was cleaned 2 times 3 years agonnnny 12*24Decision will be made upon your advice.nCould use over night parking signs.Kingston Ave. 46 years n nNo problemsnnnny 8*16Middle of front yardnNoKingston Ave. 46 years n nnnnnnnN/AKingston Ave. 41 years y y Tree roots every 12 to 18 mos nnnnn/an/aN/AKingston Ave. 49 years n nnnnny 8*16nN/AKingston Ave. 52 years n nn/a nnnnnI would favor a speed bump on east blockMary 21 no noyes in the spring yesuse a pump to divert down driveway, 40 ft from house in backnoyes 12x24where flower bed currently isyesBetter lighting. Sidewalk on Mary St. instead of Meyer. We are landlocked by 3 majoy busy roads: Stillwater, Minnehaha, and McKnight. This area needs a better park on the newly purchased park land. Mary 38 no nonononononoMeyer 26 yes yessewer problems every other yearyesafter big rain stormsyesstays for 1 day, 1 foot from house on north sidenonoyesOur entire block do not want sidewalks - there is no foot traffic. As mentioned at the meeting, the people on Bartelmy want the sidewalk as it's more of a thoroughfare. Meyer 4 no nohad a 1 time problem with roots. Pipe has been replacedyesafter big storms, in the spring (goes into garage)yeson driveway, lasts a day, bottom of steps near retaining wallnoyes 8x16front yard north side of drivewayyesdo not want trees removed. Cost issue as we are not planning to live at home long term. Our section of road is not as bad as others. Do not want sidewalk on our side of street.Meyer 7 nononononoyes12x24yesI have a neighbor that resides at the deand end on Stillwater Road (Seventh & Meyer) that has created his ownprivate drive that goes onto Seventh and on our property - what barrier or will he be taxed for the boulevard as well?n/a 40 years n nn/a nnnnyN/AOnacrest Ct. 42 years n nn/annnyWe put in a special window and a drain in the window wellnyWe have to think about it. I don't think Onacrest Curve needs these improvements.Our hill runs down and drain collects it.There is no problem.Onacrest Ct. 17 years n nnnIt has happened-poor drainageaaway from house,fixed my gutteryCouple hours,between house and Western Hills Park,by tennis court ,SE about 75 feetyGutter/drain y n/aWhatever ,I just like the look nWant a NEW mailbox post -we will purchase new mailbox/we do share a post now.Onacrest Ct. 3 1/2 years n nnnnny 8*16 n/ayN/AOnacrest Ct. 53 years n nWe had tree root problems years back.That tree has been removed from Blvd.nnBasement drain tile nn/annMy only concern is why we need 8 or 9 rubbish trucks everyThursday?Onacrest Ct. 52 years n n n n n n/a n y N/A
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 131 of 138
Bartelmy Meyer Area Street Improvements, City Project 11-14Questionnaire SummaryStreetYears @ AddressSanitary Issue Require Regular Cleaning CommentTelevised ?Drainage IssueWhenStanding WaterCommentDirect FloodingCommentRain GardenSizeLocationDriveway ProgramGeneral CommentsOnacrest Ct. 25 years n y roots/every 15 months nyAfter big rain stormsycomes in through garage in 2 spots,standing water in front by tree roots,several hrs ,1-2 feet from house ,steps and foundation.yTried to slop land -add window covers /Damage to propertyy n/anorth side of houseyN/AOnacrest Ct. 52 years n nMega tree roots removed from sewer from boulevard tree 12/06/2005. Camera showed misalignment due to tree rootsynnnnnN/AOnacrest Ct. 52 years n nnnnnnnN/AOnacrest Curve 5 years n nWe had work done on the sewer system when we first moved in to eliminate sewer gas and move a toilet.n/a yAfter big rain stormsy24 hrs 5-10 yards in driveway 15-30' due south.ny 12*24In front of house nLighting ! Inadequate lights!Onacrest Curve 12 years y yroots have been a huge problem for us. nnnnnnN/AOnacrest Curve 39 years n nn/a yAfter big rain stormsnnn/aySpeed problems .We have several children on our block & could use ( caution children at play ) signs.Non inforcement problems with overnight street parking & parking in front lawns, due to too many vehicles to park in driveways.Onacrest Curve 52 years n nnnnnnnThere are too many garbage removal companies using the same routes-as many as five or six -When one could do the same with much less wear & tear on the road.Onacrest Curve 10 years n nnnnny 10*20 Front nI would like a light post in front of my house and speed bumbs.Onacrest Curve 45 years n nn/a nnnnn/aN/AOnacrest Curve 3 years n nnyAfter big stormnwater from the chimmney weep hole in basement and from side door ny 12*24nN/AOnacrest Curve 40 years n nnnny installed window wells nyStorm sewer and catch basin needed at Jackson & Summer,If not more.Onacrest Curve 55 years n nsewer back up every 4-5 years n/a nnnnyN/AOnacrest Curve 48 years n nn/annnn/annN/AOnacrest Curve 48+ years n nn n/an/an/ay ? ?nNeighbor with "prairie grass" that is very un-attractive-This is not a prairie.Onacrest Curve. 37 years n nRecived post card from city-possible tree roots in line-had plumber come out to clean line- this was several years backn/a nyI don't know what drain tile is,Tile is on pationeast side in back for standing water 1 to 2 hrs ,approx 15 fty 10*20 by rock in yard yN/ARoselawn Ave. 20 years n nn/a yAbout once every 10 years after a very big down pournnnyN/ASummer Ave, 37 years n nn/annny10*20 /12*24not at this timeyWill want ConcreteSummer Ave.12 years n nn/a nnnnnN/ASummer Ave. 17 years y n/aTree roots in sewer line 651-488-1235n/a nnnnnDuring heavy rains the road in front of our house becomes a river with run off coming from the roads above us.Summer Ave. 15 years y nThe sewer main to the street needed service to remove tree roots 3 times, 2 years ago ,I have invoices , I just have not located them yet n/a yAfter big rain stormsn 40 feet ? y some landscaping & tile y 10*20yN/ASylvan St. 47 years n nn/a nnnnnSpeeding on Larpenteur & Sylvan St.Sylvan St. 2 years n nnnnnnnN/AAgenda Item J1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 132 of 138
Bartelmy Meyer Area Street Improvements, City Project 11-14Questionnaire SummaryStreetYears @ AddressSanitary Issue Require Regular Cleaning CommentTelevised ?Drainage IssueWhenStanding WaterCommentDirect FloodingCommentRain GardenSizeLocationDriveway ProgramGeneral CommentsSylvan St. 7+ years n nn/a nnnnnYes , We have a above ground culvert.What will happen to it?Sylvan St. 26 years n nnnnnnn/aWe live in a alley and our access out of garage is through the ally and onto Kingston ,We do nt have a garage Sylvan Street and do not use it. Why should we pay for Sylvan sewer & gutters ,rain water gardens when we do not use it! Sylvan street does not need work....Sylvan St. 51 years n n/annnnnnN/ASylvan St. 5 years n nn/annnnn/annN/ASylvan St. 7 years n nnnyn/annyMore light on street (Kingston dead end)Van Dyke StreetAccess to Keller Golf course driving rangeAgenda Item J1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 133 of 138
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 134 of 138
PROJECT NUMBER:PW08.070
PROJECT TITLE:Bartelmy Meyer Area Streets
DESCRIPTION:Neighborhood Area Street Improvements and Full Reconstruction of State Aid Street
JUSTIFICATION:
Bartelmy Street, a state aid route from Minnehaha Avenue to Stillwater Road, is in poor condition. This
section of roadway does not currently have curb and gutter. The northern half of the roadway has minimal
storm sewer. A full reconstruction is necessary.
The neighborhood streets north of Minnehaha Avenue and east of Stillwater Road are beginning to fail and
are in need of improvement. The streets include Brand Street, Meyer Street, Mary Street, and 7th
Street.
1.3 miles of streets, Average PCI: 36/100
PROJECT STARTING DATE:July 2011
PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:October 2012
PROJECT COSTS
PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCES BY YEARS:
Preliminaries:$100,000
Land Acquisition:$0
Construction:$2,330,000
Equipment and Other:$0
Project Costs:$2,430,000
TOTAL COST:$2,430,000
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
2012 - 2016
PROJECT CATEGORY:Public Works
NEIGHBORHOOD:09 - Beaver Lake
Funding Source Prior Years 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Funding Total
Bonds-G.O. Improvement 100,000 183,400 0 0 0 0 283,400
Bonds-Special Assessment 0 851,000 0 0 0 0 851,000
Sanitary Sewer Fund 0172,0000000172,000
St. Paul Water 0 97,200 0 0 0 0 97,200
Environmental Utility Fund 0 175,000 0 0 0 0 175,000
St. Paul W.A.C. Fund 0 297,200 0 0 0 0 297,200
Bonds-M.S.A. 0 554,200 0 0 0 0 554,200
74
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 5
Packet Page Number 135 of 138
Bartelmy‐Meyer Area Street Improvements – Girl Scout Troop Meeting
City staff met with Girl Scout Troop 53521 at Gethsemane Lutheran Elementary School on November
17th, 2011 to discuss the proposed Bartelmy‐Meyer Area Street Improvement Project. This same Girl
Scout Troop (then Brownies) contacted City staff and their local representatives in April 2011 in regards
to pedestrian safety on the streets around their school. Their involvement at that time resulted in the
installation of additional “School Zone” signs by MnDOT on Stillwater Road. Staff was impressed by the
Girl Scouts desier to better their community and therefore wanted to solicit their input for the Bartelmy‐
Meyer Project. Staff presented to the Girl Scouts the various items that are replaced as part of the
project and asked them for feedback on what types of improvements they thought were necessary in
the neighborhood. Many ideas were to be had, with most ideas focusing on the need for safe areas to
walk to school and the need for upgrades to the Gethsemane Park playground area. According to Judy
Hinck, Principal of Gethsemane Lutheran School, the Girls were quite happy to have been involved. “ I
wish you could have seen the next day as the girls dragged classmates into the room to explain the
project to them and to let them know what might happen with the playground. Kids were very excited,
and I believe that you now have a group of girls who will be active in their communities all of their lives‐‐
they know that their involvement can make a difference! “
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6
Packet Page Number 136 of 138
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 7
Packet Page Number 137 of 138
Agenda Item J1 Attachment 8Packet Page Number 138 of 138