HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 07-12 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, July 12, 1999
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 99 -15
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Council - Manager Workshop (June 7, 1999)
2. Minutes of Special Meeting 99 -13 (June 7,1999)
3. Minutes of Meeting 99 -14 (June 28. 1999)
E., APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered-to be routine by the City
Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to
discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be
considered separately.,
1. Approval of Claims
2. Surrender of Liquor License - Hideaway
3 + Refr i gle r�a nt lLea k - Police-; Department
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. Menards (2280 Maplewood Drive)
- Conditional Use Permit
- Design Approval
2. 7:10 P.M. Feed Products and Service (1300 McKnight Road)
- Conditional Use Permit
- Design Approval
3. 7:20 P.M. Knollwood Circle (Cypress Street, South of County Road C>
- Preliminary Plat
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. City Hall Security System
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. New Century PUD (Highwood and Century Avenues)
- Comprehensive Plan Changes
- Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
- Street Right -of -Way Vacations
- Easement Vacations
- Code Variation - Street Right -of -Way Width
- Code Vari Str.eet Pauement:W dth
- Preliminry Plat
- No Parking on Streets
- Early Start of Construction of Model Homes
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approve Budget for the Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Street Improvements, City Project
99 -13.
2. First Financial (East of 2025 E. County Road D)Building Design. Site and Landscape
Plan Revisions
3. Criteria for Accepting Liquor License Applications
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Mayor's Mailbox
2. Historical Society
3 Community Center
4.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Referendums - Educational and Marketing Plan
2.
3.
0. ADJOURNMENT
CITY COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
MEETING MINUTES
5:00 p.m., Monday, June 7, 1999
Maplewood Room, City Hall
A. Call To Order
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Rossbach at 5:00 p.m.
Be Roll Call
Mayor George Rossbach _ -
-- Present --
Councilmember Sherry Allenspach
Present
Councilmember ]Dale Carlson
Present
Councilmember Kevin Kittridge
Present
Councilmember Marvin Koppen
Present
Others Present:
City Manager Michael McGuire
Assistant to the City Manager Michael Ericson
Community Oriented Services Coordinator Colleen Dirkswager
Human Resource Director Sherrie Le
Parks and Recreation Director Bruce Anderson
C. Approval of Agenda
Mayor Rossbach moved to aDprove the agenda as resented. The motion was seconded b
Councilmember Koppen. Motion passed 5 -0.
D. Police Civil Service Commission Interviews
The three finalists for the Police Civil Service Commission vacancy were Joe Zappa, Tom
Lehmann, and Eric Ahlness. All three individuals are Maplewood residents with impressive
experience related to the commission position. Three 15 minute interviews began promptly at
5:00 p.m with questions from the mayor and city councilmembers. City Manager McGuire will
collect the ballots from the mayor and city councilmembers and announce the selection to the city
council at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
E. Community Oriented Services Update
Community Oriented Services Coordinator Colleen Dirkswager presented council with an update
of the activities and projects she is currently working on. Colleen reported on the draft copy of
the "Good Neighbor Policies" which the council was pleased with.
Fs Deer Management Discussion
Colleen presented the City Council with a report on her efforts to explore options for deer
management and to further explore a cooperative partnership between the city, Ramsey County,
and the City of St. Paul. Council listened to Ed Olson from the St. Paul Parks Department as he
explained the deer population issue in St. Paul. Council also listened to Bob Whitin g from the
Metro Bow-hunters Resource as he explained how his organization has been ofassistance to
many cities in the metro area. He said the biggest focus should be a controlled hunt inspecific
areas in January, February, and March. Bob Welch from the DNR said that regular hunting
within the city can be accomplished with an amendment from the council to allow it. He said the
issue is deer management not deer extermination. Council will review the issue and schedule
another public hearing in Carver Gym later this year.
G. Comprehensive Parks Plan Proposal
Parks and Recreation Director Bruce Anderson reported that in April 1998 the City Council
formally approved the hiring of Brauer and Associates to assist in updating the Comprehensive
Parks and Open Space Plan. During the past eight months staff has been working in close
cooperation with the Parks and Recreation Commission to solicit community input. The
community input process included an extensive survey which was completed in July 1998 and
followed with a series of community focus groups with local organizations. Staff is actively
involved in developing the final draft of the Comprehensive Parks and Open Space Plan. Parks
and Recreation Director Bruce Anderson reviewed with council the preliminary concept map and
each of the proposed park redevelopment projects.
H. Open Space Land Acquisitions Report
Assistant to the City Manager Mike Ericson provided an update of the work of the Open Space
ace
p p
Acquisition Committee who have approved the top five parcel priorities to be purchased with the
remaining funds from the Open Space Bond Referendum. The five parcels are Bradley Oaks
Shreier, Kayser, Schlomka, and Corbey. Mike has had numerous meetings with the ro e
P p rtY
owners and is very close in reaching agreements with four of the five property owners for the
purchase of their properties.
I. Report from City's Y2K Task Force
Assistant to the City Manager Mike Ericson provided council with an Executive Summary of the
Y2K Action Plan. The Task Force has continued to meet to develop acity -wide action plan to
deal with the Y2K issue both internally and externally. The city council reviewed the Executive
Summary and asked a few questions. Councilmember Kittrid e asked what an budget would be
g g
for the worst case scenario and Mike estimated it at $30,000 if full staffing was required.
Department heads will also review and comment on the plan which will be finalized by the Task
Force and used as a guide to provide staffing during the New Year's Eve weekend.
j. Other Business
1. Cable TV Show - Maplewood City Update - "Straight Scoop"
City Manager Mike McGuire discussed the proposed weekly 30-minute city update
program which will be produced and directed by Joe Frazier from GTN Channel 16 to
better inform and educate the citizens of Maplewood about city council activities, cit
issues including Y2K, and a wide variety of city departmental activities. It will be
produced at the Oakdale studio and hosted by a GTN reporter and a rotation of the mayor,
y
city councilmembers, and the city manager. Council liked the idea and asked that it
brought to an upcoming council meeting for formal approval.
K. Future Topics
1. City Goals
The 1999 City Goals List developed at the council /staff retreat earlier this year will be
reviewed periodically at Council/Manager Workshop meetings throughout the year to
row g y
provide updates, reschedule priorities, and measure progress on the completion of g oals.
Z. Community Survey - Decisions Resources Ltd.
Council had inquired earlier this year about the need to have a citizen survey since it has
been a few years since the last one was completed by Decision Resources, Ltd.. The
survey would measure citizen views on a number of important city issues including the
level of citizen support for three possible referendums in the fall: on -sale liquor licenses
parks redevelopment plan, and fire hall /fire equipment. Council will review this issue at
the next council /manager workshop.
L. BID AWARD FOR MOVE OF BRUENTRUP FARM
The meeting minutes for this agenda item are contained in the attached minutes since this ortion
of the
e meeting was a specially- called council meeting scheduled for 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of
awarding the bid for the move of the Bruentrup Farm. The city clerk's office has re ared the
p p
minutes of the specially- called council meeting in accordance with state statute.
M. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Allens ach and seconded bv Carlson to ad'ourn the meetin at 7:53 p.m. Motion
passed 5 -0.
MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:30 P.M., Monday, June 7, 1999
Maplewood Room, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 99 -13
A. ROLL CALL:
George F. Rossbach, Mayor Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present
Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present
Kevin Kittridge, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Rossbach moved to approve the agenda as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
C. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Award Bid for the Relocation of the Bruentrup Farm
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the
report.
b. Assistant to the City Manager Ericson presented the id results:
Semple Excavating Inc. $84,000 and Stubbs Building Movers $124,200
Councilmember Koppen moved to award the bid to Semple Excavating, Inc. In the amount of
$84,000.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson
Mayor Rossbach moved to increase the bid award by $5,000 from $84,000 to $89,000 to cover
costs for moving the metal shed.
Councilmember Koppen accepted the motion as a friendly amendment.
F. ADJOURNMENT Ayes - all
Councilmember Allenspach motioned to adjourn at 7:53 P.M.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson
Ayes - all
Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, June 28, 1999
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 99 -14
A. CALL TO ORDER:
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Rossbach.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL:
George F. Rossbach, Mayor
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember
Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember
Kevin Kittridge, Councilmember
Marvin C .- �= Koppen , Councilmember
Present
Present
Present
Present
.Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the minutes of Meeting 99 -13 (June 14, 1999) as
presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
Ayes - all
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Mayor Rossbach moved to approve the Agenda as amended.
M -2. Historical Society
M -3. Community Center
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson
Ayes - all
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
1. Mosquito Control -Jim Stark
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the
report.
b. Jim Stark from the Moquito Control District gave a brief history of mosquito
control in the city and answered questions posed by the Council.
Councilmember Kittrdige move to remove the ban on spraying for mosquito control on public
lands effective immediately.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
Ayes - al l
G. CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the Consent Agenda.
6 -28 -99 1
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
1. Approval of Claims
Approved the following claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 13,795.16 Checks #7940 - #7945
$ 113,958.18 Checks #44140 - #44261
$ 42,200.16 Checks #7946 - #7953
$ 243,922.65 Checks #44264 - #44411
$ 413.876.15 Total Accounts Payable
Dated 6 -4 thru 6 -11 -99
Dated 6 -15 -99
Dated 6 -11 thru 6 -18 -99
Dated 6 -22 -99
PAYROLL: $ 305,834.26 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits Dated
$ 22 448 ..16 Payroll Deduct on Checks Dated
$ 328,282.42 Total Payroll
$ 742,158.57 GRAND TOTAL
2. Miscellaneous P e Bear Avenue Business Association
Approved a Miscellaneous Permit to conduct a parade for the White Bear Avenue Business
Association on July 15, 1999 from 7:00 -9:30 p.m.
3. Gladstone North Area Streets, Project 99 -06, Close Project
Closed project 99 -06 and directed staff to investigate a different neighborhood to be
considered for the year 2000 street improvement,
4. Police Department Donation
Accepted a donated Colt AR -15 rifle by Mr. Stelter for the use in the Police Department.
5. Rail Road Crossing Agreement 77713
Approved an agreement allowing for the upgraded RR crossing equipment and authorized staff
to execute the agreement at no cost to the city.
6. Request for Computer Software for the Community Center
Approved spending $17,820 from the capital outlay fund 602 - 000 - 000 -1540 to purchase new
facility management software form CSI Software.
7. Council /Manager Workshop - Change of Date
Re- scheduled the Monday July 5, 1999 Council /Manage Workshop to Tuesday, July 6 due to the
July 4th Holiday.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 7:18 P.M. Hill - Murray High School (2625 Larpenteur Avenue)
- Conditional Use Permit Revision
- Design Approval
a. Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of
the report.
d. Commissioner Gary Pearson presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Boardmember Tim Johnson presented the Community Design Review Board report.
f. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents
or opponents. The following person was heard:
Joseph Peshges, President of Hill- Murray High School, 2625 Larpenteur Avenue
g. Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved /introduced the following resolution approving revisions for the
conditional use permit for Hill- Murray school and athletic fields at 2625 Larpenteur
Avenue East. The city bases this approval on the findings required by ordinance. This
approval is subject to conditions of approval adopted by the city council on May 11, 1998,
and moved its adoption:
99 -06 -50
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Hill- Murray High School requested that the city revise their conditional use
permit for a school.
is: WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2625 Larpenteur Avenue East. The legal description
Part of the S Y of the SE 1/4 of S 13, T 29N, R22W, Ramsey County, MN (PIN 13 -29-
22 -43 -0001)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 7, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this revised permit.
2. The city council held a public hearing on June 28, 1999. City staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as
required -by law. The - council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and
present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit revision, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding
area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods
of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause
a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke,
dust, odor, fumes, water or air ollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration,
general unsightliness, electrica interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would
not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including
streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems,
schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or
services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
10... The, city. counci 1 may - -waive any of the - above,: re- ui rements for a public building or
utility structure, provided the council shall first make a determination that the
balancing of ublic interest between governmental units of the state would be best
served by sucr waiver.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
16 All construction shall follow the plans as noted below:
a. For the athletic fields, follow the plans date - stamped March 6, 1998.
b. For the school and entry addition, follow the plans date - stamped May 6, 1999.
The director of community development may approve - minor changes. The school
shall move the proposed temporary storage buildings as far away from the
wetland buffer as possible to minimize the variance they will need.
2. The proposed construction for the front entry addition and dro -off drive must be
substantially started within one year of council approval or t e permit revision
shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit annually to monitor the traffic and
parking situations related to the use of the athletic fields.
4. Any new lights shall be installed to meet the city code. This requires that they
be screened or aimed so they do not cause any light -glare problems on streets or
residential properties.
5. Dedicate and record.a wetland - protection buffer easement. This easement shall
describe the boundary of the buffer and rohibit any building, mowing, cutting,
filling or dumping within the buffer. T e buffer shall follow the pro osed chain -
link fence line on the plans for the athletic fields date - stamped Marc 6, 1998.
The part of this wetland buffer area that is already mowed lawn may remain as
such. The school shall have the contractor install the fence and swale while
doing the adjacent field construction.
6. Post signs on the edge of the wetland - protection buffer prohibiting any building,
mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. Wetland buffer signs in
the mowed area shall be placed at the edge of the lawn.
7. That portion of the roposed walking /running path that is within 50 feet of the
wetland shall be bui t with a pervious material.
8. Ensure that all bleachers and dugouts are at least 30 feet from the Sterling
Street and Larpenteur Avenue right -of -ways.
9. The city may require the applicant to plant 30 native species of trees for
screening between the playing fields and the homes on Knoll Circle, as may be
determined at a future hearing on the Conditional Use Permit.
10. The school shall prepare for city approval a turf management plan for the athletic
fields. This plan shall include the mowing, watering and fertilizing practices
that the school will follow in the care of their athletic fields and grounds. The
school shall prepare and follow the plan so the practices will minimize the impact
of the storm water runoff on the nearby wetlands. The city must approve this plan
before issuing a building permit for the front -entry addition.
11. Submit a grading and drainage plan for watershed district approval to provide
sedimentation control at the stormwater discharge point before it dumps into the
south wetland area.
Seconded by Mayor Rossbach. Ayes all
Councilmember Kop en moved to approve the plans date - stamped March 19, 1999, for
the parking lot c anges and proposed front entry addition to Hill- Murray High
School at 2625 Larpenteur Avenue. The city bases this approval on the findings
required by the code and the project shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a
building permit for this project.
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall submit the
following for city staff approval:
a. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to the city
engineer.
b. The architectural precast concrete shall match the existing Kasota
stone on the building. The applicant shall provide samples for
staff approval.
c. The finalized turf management plan as required by the conditional
use permit.
3. The applicant or contractor shall complete the following before
occupying the addition:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this
construction.
b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
c. Install reflectorized stop signs at all exits, a handicap- parking
sign for each handicap - parking space and an address on the
building.
d. Post a "no left turn" sign at the easterly curb cut.
e. Install continuous concrete curb and gutter all around the new
parking lot and new driveways. (code requirement)
f. Paint the rooftop mechanical equipment to match the building color
if the units are visible. (code requirement)
g. Install site - security lighting as required by the code. The light
source, including the lens covering the bulb, shall be concealed
so the light source is not visible and so it does not cause any
nuisance to drivers or neighbors.
h. Install a six - foot -wide concrete sidewalk along the west edge of
the new east parking lot. This sidewalk shall run from the north
end of the new parking lot to the sidewalk that connects to the
front of the school.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary
occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public
health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit
for the work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the
unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by
June 1 if :the addition-is occupied in the fall or winter or within
six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
Seconded by Mayor Rossbach
Ayes - all
2. 7:28 P.M. Schroeder Milk (2080 Rice Street)
- Conditional Use Permit
- Design Approval
- Tax - Increment Financing Plan
a. Enlargement of Development District No.1
b. Establishment of Economic Development District No. 1 -4
a. Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the
specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Gary Pearson presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Boardmember Tim Johnson presented the Community Design Review Board
report.
f. Mary Ippel of Briggs and Morgan gave a presentation.
g. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Carl Schroeder, Schroeder Milk, 2080 Rice Street
Bob Zick, 1880 East Shore Drive
h. Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Kittrdige moved/ introduced the following resolution approving a
conditional use permit for a Dairy Product Processing business at 2080 Rice Street
and moved its adoption:
99 -06 -51
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Carl Schroeder, J r. ap lied for a conditional use permit to expand a
dairy product processing and d ution facility:
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2080 Rice Street. The legal
description is:
SUBJECT TO HWY; IN IRENE'S ADDITION; VACATED STREETS AND ALLEYS ACCRUING AND
BLOCKS 1 THRU 3; AND IN SAID SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, THE SOUTH 400
FEET OF PART OF WEST % OF NORTHWEST 1/4 NORTH OF IRENE'S ADDITION AND THE
NORTH 200 FEET OF PART'OF WEST % OF NORTHWEST=1 /4'SOUTH. IRENE'S ADDITION IN
SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 7, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve this permit.
2. On June 28, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff
published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property
owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and
present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
i4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above -
described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city
approves this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be
in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding
area.
3.- The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or
methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental,
disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive
noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage,
water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or
other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and
would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed
streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including
streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer
systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or
services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural
and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The
director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of
council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may
extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. If the city council determines there is not enough on -site parking, the
council may require that the property owner provide additional parking.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson
Ayes - a 11
Councilmember Kittrdige moved to approve the plans, date - stamped May 7, 1999 and
the parking addendum date - stamped May 25, 1999, for the three -phase Schroeder Milk
expansion proporal at 2080 Rice Street. Approyal is based on the findings
required by the code and subject to the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building
permit for this project.
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall:
a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to the
city engineer for approval.
b. Submit a revised site plan for staff approval showing the location of
seven additional parking spaces on the existing pavement.
3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Provide enough handicap- accessible parking spaces to comply with ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. This may involve
restriping an existing parking lot to provide additional spaces close
to the building.
b. With the Phase 2 construction, close the existing curb cut along the
Cub Foods driveway with continuous curbing, remove the asphalt and
landscape according to the approved plan.
c. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter all around the new parking
lot.
d. Paint new rooftop mechanical equipment to match the building color if
the units are visible. (code requirement)
e. The trash- dumpster screening requirement is waived unless the
dumpstern would be visible to the public. In which case, an enclosure
shall be provided using the same materials and color as the building.
f. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for the landscaped area
north of the building.
g. Provide site - security lighting as required by the code. The light
source, including the lens covering the bulb, shall be concealed so
not to cause any nuisance to drivers or neighbors.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy
if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public
health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for
the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the
unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by
June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within six
weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans The ,di rector of community
development may approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
Council member - Kittrdige moved to approve the following resolution for the tax -
increment financing for the expansion of the Schroeder Milk processing plant at
2080 Rice Street.
99 -06 -52
RESOLUTION RATIFYING NOTICE PUBLICATION ENLARGING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
, ADOPTING THE MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM THEREFOR, AND ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -4 THEREIN AND ADOPTING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
WHEREAS, The City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City), has heretofore
established Development District No. 1 and it has been proposed that the City
enlarge the boundaries thereof and modify the development program therefor, and
establish Economic Development District No. 104 therein and adopt a tax increment
financing plan therefor under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.124 to 469.134 and 469.174 to 469.179 (collectively, the "Act "); and
The City Council has investigated the facts and has caused to be prepared a
proposed Modified Development Program for Development District No. 1, and has
caused to be prepared a proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic
Development District No. 1 -4; and
The City has erformed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the
proposed esta lishment of Economic Development District No. 104, and proposed
adoption of the Modified Development Program and the proposed adoption of a Tax
Increment Financing Plan therefor, including, but not limited to, notification of
Ramsey County and Independent School District No. 623 having taxing jurisdiction
over the property to be included in Economic Development District No. 1 -4, a
review of the City Planning Commission of the pro osed Modified Development Plan
for Development District No. 1, as enlarged and t iie holding of a public hearing
upon published and mailed notice as required by law; and
NOW, THEREFOR, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Maplewood as follows:
1. Development District No. 1, as Enlarged. The city of Maplewood is modifying
the boundaries of Development District No. 1 as described in the Modified
Development Program.
2. Modified Development Program. The City of Maplewood is modifying the
Development Program for Development District No. 1 to allow for the enlargement
thereof and the increased costs associated with Economic Development District No.
1 -4 as described in the Modified Development Program for Development District No.
1, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, and the Modified
Development Program is adopted as the development program for Development District
No. 1, as enlarged.
3. Economic Development District No. 1 -4. There is established in the City of
Maplewood within Development District No. 1 a tax increment financing district,
the initial boundaries of which are fixed and determined as described in the Tax
Increment Financing Plan.
4. Tax Increment Financing Plan. The Tax Increment Financing Plan is adopted as
the tax increment financing plan for Economic Development District No. 10 -4, and
the City Council makes the following findings:
A. Economic Development District No. 104 is an economic development district
t as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 12, the specific
basis for such determination being that the Schroeder Milk project will
increase employment in the State and it will result in the preservation and
enhancement of the tax base of the State.
B. The proposed redevelopment in the opinion of the City Council, would not
occur solely through private investment within the reasonable foreseeable
future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably
be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less
that the increases in the market value estimated to result from the proposed
development after subtracting the present value of -the projected tax
increments for the maximum duration of Economic Development District No. 104
permitted by the Tax Increment Financing Plan.
The reasons supporting this finding are that:
1. Schroeder Milk has represented to the City that is would bot undertake
the project in Maplewood without the City's use of tax increment financing
there development activities because of prohibitive costs. It is
necessary to finance these development activities through the use of tax
increment financing so that other development by private enterprise will
occur within Development District No. 1.
2. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and
without establishment of Economic Development District No.1-4 and the use
of tax increment has been preformed as described above. Such analysis is
found in Exhibit C of the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and indicated that
the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less
the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site
absent the establishment of Economic Development District No. 1 -4 and the
use of tax increments.
C. The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development District No. 1 -4
conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City of
Maplewood as a whole.
The reasons for supporting this finding are that:
1. Economic Development District No. 1 -4 is properly zoned; and
2. The Tax Increment Financing Plan will generally compliment and serve to
implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan.
D. The Tax Increment Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity,
con �
consistent with eh sound needs of the City of Maplewood as a whole, for the
development or redevelopment of Development District No. 1 buy private
enterprise. The y p
p e reasons supporting this finding are that:
The development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment b
private p p y
p e enterprise can occur within Development District No. 1.
5. Public Purpose. The Modified Development Program for Development District No.
1 as enlarg
ged, and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development
District No. 1 -4 confo
orm �n all respects to the requirements of the Act and will
help fulfill a need to develop areas of the City which are already uilt to
provide em to men y
p p y t o portunities, to improve the tax base, and to improve the
general economy of t e State and thereby serves a public purpose.
6. Exemption from LGA /HACA. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399
Su d. 6, as amended by the 1995 Omnibus Tad Bill, Article 5, Section 6, the City
elects to make qualifying local con
q y g contribution to the project from unrestricted
money of the City in an amount equal to 10% of the annual tax increments from
Eco =nomic Development District No 1 - 4. Such local contributions shall not exceed
2% of the net capacity of the City.
7. Certification. The Auditor of Ramsey County is requested to certify he
origin q y
net tax capacity of Economic Development District No.1 -4 as described in
Tax Increment Financing Plan, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount b
which the orig inal net tax cap acity h y
p y as increased of decreased in accordance with
the Act; and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this
request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify,
ro y s p y'
together with a list of all
properties within Economic Development District No.1 -4
for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediate)
preceding the adoption of this Res y
p g p Resolution.
8. Filing. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a co of
the Modified Development Program copy
p g and Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic
Development District No. 1 -4 with the Commissioner of Revenue.
9. Administration. The administration of Development District No. 1 remains
assigned to the City Manager who shall from time to time be owers
and duties ursu ranted such g p
ant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.130 and 469.131 as the
City Counci may deem appropriate.
10. Notice of Public Hearing. The actions of City staff in causing he notice f
public hearing to be published g °
p g p shed in the Official newspaper of the city are hereby
ratified, confirmed and adopted.
y
p
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
3. 7:45 P.M. New Century PUD (Highwood and Century Avenues)
- Comprehensive Plan Changes
- Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
- Street Right -of -Way Vacations
- Easement Vacations
- Code Variation - Street Right -of -Way Width
- Code Variation - Street Pavement Width
- Preliminary Plat
- No Parking on Streets
- Early Start of Construction of Model Homes
a. Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting fora public
hearing.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the
specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Gary Pearson presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for
proponents or opponents. The following persons were
heard:
Jack ?, architect and Planner
Bob Engstrom, Robert Engstrom Companies
Mike Thisen, 2587 Schaller
Steve Quayle, 2563 Schaller
Marva Buford, 2611 Schaller
Polly Gustafson, 2586 Schaller
Dawn Karnuth, 2586 Schaller
Scott Thury, 994 O'Day Street
David Gobran, 2594 Schaller
Danna Johnson, 2610 Schaller
Dan Jensen, 2547 Scahller
Jo Lou, 2531 Scahller
Tom Wood, 966 Dennis Street
Scott Lease, 978 Dennis Street
Erwin Carlson, 2599 Southcrest
David Doerr, 2660 Highwood
Paul Swanson, 2595 Schaller
Brad Schultz, 2528 Schaller
Deb Singletary, 966 McClelland
Roger Muntifering, 992 Ferndale Street South
John Daniwitz, 1753 Lotus Avenue
Ann Feuersyein, 991 Ferndale Street
Ron Burzinski, 1358 Fulman
Diane Kowalcheck, 991 Ferndale Street
Dan Schoeder, 991 Ferndale
Dan Brunz, 2600 Southcrest Avenue
Roger Muntifering, second appearance
Ery Carlson, second appearance
, 1399 Kohlman Avenue
Tom Wood, second appearance
g. Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Carlson moved to table for two weeks.
Seconded by Councilmember Kittrdige Ayes - all
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Seal Coat, Project 99 -01
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics
of the report.
b. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
Councilmember Koppen moved to award the contract to Allied Blacktop Company in the
amount of $78,810.00 for the 1999 sealcoat, Project 99 -01.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Fire Safety Referendum
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
b. Finance Director Faust presented the s p ecifics of the Bond
Referendum.
c. Fire Chief Hewitt presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Carlson introduced the following resolution formally establishing
the election on November 2nd for the $3,540,000 fire safety referendum and moved
its adoption:
99 -06 -53
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN ELECTION ON THE QUESTION
OF ISSUING $3,540,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ( "Council ") of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota
( "the city "), as follows:
1. Project. This Council has investigated the facts and does hereby find,
determine and declare that it is necessary and expedient to defray the expense of
the acquisition and betterment of fire station and fire equipment and apparatus
for the City.
2. Election. The proposition of authorizing the issuance of $3,540,000 General
Obligation Bonds for said purpose shall be submitted to the qualified electors of
the city at the general election to be held on Tuesday, November 2, 1999. Said
election -shall be held between the hours of seven o'clock a.m. and eight o'clock
p.m. The polling places shall be the MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #1 (PARKSIDE) located
at 2001 McMENEMY ROAD, ST. JEROME'S SCHOOL located at 380 ROSELAWN AVENUE E.,
EDGERTON SCHOOL located at 1929 EDGERTON STREET, MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #2
(GLADSTONE) located at 1900 CLARENCE STREET, GLADSTONE COMMUNITY CENTER located at
1945 MANTON STREET, MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #7 (HAZELWOOD) located at 1530 E.
COUNTY ROAD C, FIRST EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH located at 2696 HAZELWOOD, CONCORDIA
ARMS located at 2030 LYDIA AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD CITY HALL located at 1830 EAST COUNTY
RD B, RAMSEY COUNTY HOME located at 2000 WHITE BEAR AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD MIDDLE
SCHOOL located at 1896 LAKEWOOD DRIVE N., BEAVER LAKE SCHOOL located at 1060
STERLING AVE. N. MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #1(E.CO.LINE) located at 1177 CENTURY
AVENUE N.,
CARVER SCHOOL located at 2680 UPPER AFTON ROAD, MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #4
(E.CO.LINE 2 located at )2501 LONDIN LANE, MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #4 (E.CO.LINE
Mocated at 2501 LONDIN LANE
I Notice and Ballot. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post and
Publish according to law a Notice of Election and Ballot combining the information
required as to offices to be filled with the information set forth on the
following forms and to prepare information relating to the question in the
combined notice (as provided above):
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Mayor Rossbach moved to waive the rules of procedure to complete the meeting.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
2. Parks Referendum
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
b. Finance Director Faust presented the specifics of the Bond
Referendum.
c. Parks and Recreation Director Anderson presented the specifics of the
report.
Cuncilmember Carlson introduced the following resolution formally establishing the
election on November 2nd for the $3,470,000 parks referendum and moved its
adoption:
99 -06 -54
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN ELECTION ON THE QUESTION
OF ISSUING $3,470,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ( "Council ") of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota
( "the city "), as follows:
1. Project. This Council has investigated the facts and does hereby find,
determine =and declare that it is necessary and expedient to defray the expense of
the acquisition and betterment of land, buildings, and facilities within the City
for its program of public recreation.
2. Election. The proposition of authorizing the issuance of $3,470,000 General
Obligation Bonds for said purpose shall be submitted to the qualified electors of
the city at the general election to be held on Tuesday, November 2, 1999. Said
election shall be held between the hours of seven o'clock a.m. and eight o'clock
p.m. The oiling places shall be the MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #1 (PARKSIDE) located
at 2001 Mc ENEMY ROAD, ST. JEROME'S SCHOOL located at 380 ROSELAWN AVENUE E.,
EDGERTON SCHOOL located at 1929 EDGERTON STREET, MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #2
(GLADSTONE)located at 1900 CLARENCE STREET, GLADSTONE COMMUNITY CENTER located at
1945 MANTON STREET, MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #7 (HAZELWOOD) located at 1530 E.
COUNTY ROAD C, FIRST EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH located at 2696 HAZELWOOD, CONCORDIA
ARMS located at 2030 LYDIA AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD CITY HALL located at 1830 EAST COUNTY
RD B, RAMSEY COUNTY HOME located at 2000 WHITE BEAR AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD MIDDLE
SCHOOL located at 1896 LAKEWOOD DRIVE N., BEAVER LAKE SCHOOL located at 1060
STERLING AVE. N. MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #1(E.CO.LINE) located at 1177 CENTURY
AVENUE N.,
CARVER SCHOOL located at 2680 UPPER AFTON ROAD, MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #4
(E.CO.LINE 2 located at )2501 LONDIN LANE, MAPLEWOOD FIRE STATION #4 (E.CO.LINE
Mocated at 2501 LONDIN LANE
3. Notice and Ballot. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post and
publish according to law a Notice of Election and Ballot combining the information
required as to offices to be filled with the information set forth on the
following forms and to prepare information relating to the question in the
combined notice (as provided above):
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Mayor Rossbach,
Councilmembers Allenspach,
Carlson, Kittrdige
Nays - Councilmember Koppen
3. Liquor License Referendum
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
b. City Clerk Guilfoile presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Kittrdige moved to direct staff to put a referendum on the ballot
for the General Election this fall requesting an additional seven license and
moved its adoption:
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Street Jurisdiction Resolution with Ramsey County
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics
of the report.
Councilmember Carlson moved /introduced the following Resolutions changing
- jurisdiction of 5.51 miles of roads from Ramsey County jurisdiction to the City of
Maplewood jurisdiction and moved there adoption:
99 -06 -55
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, The 1991 Minnesota Legislature established a Ramsey County Local
Government Services Study Commission to "report on the advantages and
disadvantages of sharing, cooperating, restructuring, or consolidating..."
activities in areas of public service including public works; and
WHEREAS, The consolidation plan provides for reclassification of roadways and
corresponding changes in jurisdiction including the transfer of local and State
Aid roadways between the County and municipalities; and
WHEREAS, Maryland Avenue (County State Aid Highway 31) from McKnight Road to
Lakewood Drive; Roselawn Avenue (County State Aid Highway 26) from Rice Street to
Trunk Highway 61; and Stillwater Avenue (County State Aid Highway 132) from
McKnight Road to Lakewood Drive, located in the City of Maplewood, are presently
under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County as County State Aid Highways; and
and WHEREAS, These roadways have been determined to serve a local function only;
WHEREAS, Revocation of "County State Aid Highway" status may be accomplished
by resolution of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioner pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 162.02; and
WHEREAS, It appears to the City Council of the City of Maplewood that the
street hereinafter described upon turnback from Ramsey County should be designated
Municipal State Aid Streets under the provision of Minnesota Law; and
WHEREAS, The consolidated plan stipulates that Ramsey County shall improve the
roadway to acceptable levels prior to transferring jurisdiction over roadway
segments from Ramsey County - to municipalites, the Ramsey County Capital
Improvement Program provides funding for these improvements; and
WHEREAS, Ramsey County performed a recycle and overlay of Maryland Avenue from
McKnight Road to Lakewood Drive in 1991; and
WHEREAS, This segment of Maryland Avenue has been improved by Ramsey County to
an acceptable level prior to the transfer of roadway jurisdiction as calculated
from the Davement condition rating of the 1997 Ramsey County Pavement Management
System, therefore exem V ting Ramsey County from providing any compensation from the
Roadway Consolidation and to the City of Maplewood for this jurisdiction
transfer; and
.WHEREAS, Ramsey County will seal coat Roselawn Avenue from Rice Street to
Trunk Highway 61 for an estimated cost of $40,000; and Stillwater Avenue from
McKnight Road to Lakewood Drive for an estimated cost of $6,000 from Capital
Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, The City of Maplewood does hereby concur with
the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners revoking the "County State Aid Highway"
status of Maryland Avenue (County State Highway 31) from McKnight Road to Lakewood
Drive; Roselawn Avenue (County State Aid Highway 26) from Rice Street to Trunk
Highway 61; and Stillwater Avenue (County State Aid Highway 132) from McKnight
Road to Lakewood Drive, and transfers jurisdiction over these roadways to the City
of Maplewood effective the first day of the first month following completion of
the sealcoat of Roselawn Avenue and Stillwater Avenue and after the Ramsey County
Office of Budgeting and Accounting has encumbered the finds necessary to fund
these sealcoat projects, and after the County is in receipt of an ado ted
resolution from the City of Maplewood concurring with the County revo ing the
"County State Aid Highway" status of Maryland Avenue from McKnight Road to
Lakewood Drive; Roselawn Avenue from Rice Street to Trunk Highway 61; and
Stillwater Avenue from McKnight Road to Lakewood Drive; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon turnback to the City of Maplewood from
Ramsey County the segments of Maryland Avenue from McKnight Road to Lakewood
Drive; Roselawn Avenue from Rice Street to Trunk Highway 61; and Stillwater Avenue
from McKnight Road to Lakewood Drive, be and are hereby established, located and
designed as Municipal State Aid Streets of said City, subject to the approval of
the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The Maplewood Engineer is authorized within the limits
of this resolution to take actions necessary to have the identified jurisdictions
changes executed.
99 -06 -56
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, The 1991 Minnesota Legislature established a Ramsey County Local
Government Services Study Commission to "report on the advantages and
disadvantages of sharing, cooperating, restructuring, or consolidating..."
activities in areas of public service including public works; and
WHEREAS, The consolidation plan provides for reclassification of roadways and
corresponding changes in jurisdiction including the transfer of local and State
Aid roadways between the County and municipalities; and
WHEREAS, Case Avenue (County Road 158) from McKnight Road to Lakewood Drive;
and Sterling Street (County Road 160) from Sounth County Line to Carver Avenue,
located in the City of Maplewood, are presently under the jurisdiction of Ramsey
County as County Roads; and
WHEREAS These roadways - have , been determi ned! -: t . o serve a local function only;
and
WHEREAS, Revocation of "County Road" status may be accomplished by resolution
of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioner pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 163.11;
and
WHEREAS, It appears to the City Council of the City of Maplewood that the
street hereinafter described upon turnback from Ramsey County should be designated
Municipal State Aid Streets under the provision of Minnesota Law; and
WHEREAS, The consolidated plan stipulates that Ramsey County shall im rove the
roadways to acceptable levels prior to transferring jurisdiction over roa way
segments from Ramsey County to municipalities, and the Ramsey County Capital
Improvement Program provides funding for these improvements; and
WHEREAS, Ramsey County will crack and sealcoat Case Avenue from McKnight Road
to Lakewood Drive for an estimated cost of $4,000; and Sterling Street from the
South County Line to Carver Avenue for an estimated cost of $14,000 from Capital
Improvement Funds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, The City of Maplewood does hereby concur with
the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners revoking the "County Road" status of Case
Avenue (County Road 158) from McKnight Road to Lakewood Drive; and Sterling Street
(County Road 160) from Sounth County Line to Carver Avenue and transfers
jurisdiction over these roadways to the City of Maplewood, effective the first day
of the first month following completion of the crack fill and sealcoat of Case
Avenue and'Sterling Street and after the Ramsey County Office of Budgeting and
Accounting has encumbered the finds necessary to fund these crack fill and
sealcoat projects, and after the County is in receipt of an adopted resolution
from the City of Maplewood concurring with the County revoking the "County Road"
status of Case Avenue from McKnight Road to Lakewood Drive; and Sterling Street
from Sounth County Line to Carver Avenue; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon turnback to the City of Maplewood from
Ramsey County the segments of Case Avenue from McKnight Road to Lakewood Drive;
and Sterling Street from Sounth County Line to Carver Avenue, be and are hereby
established, located and designed as Municipal State Aid Streets of said City,
subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of
Minnesota; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The Maplewood Engineer is authorized within the limits
of this resolution to take actions necessary to have the identified jurisdictions
changes executed.
99 -06 -57
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, The 1991 Minnesota Legislature established a Ramsey County Local
Government Services Study Commission to "report on the advantages and
disadvantages of sharing, cooperating, restructuring, or consolidating..."
activities in areas of public service including public works; and
WHEREAS, The consolidation plan provides for reclassification of roadways and
corresponding changes in jurisdiction including the transfer of local and State
Aid roadways between the County and municipalities; and
WHEREAS, Jackson Street (County Road 138) from Larpenteur Avenue to Roselawn
Avenue, McKnight Road (County Road 158) from Minnehaha Avenue to Case Avenue, and
McMenemy Street County Road 140) from Larpenteur Avenue to County Raod B. located
in the City of Maplewood, are presently under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County as
County Roads; and
WHEREAS, These roadways have been determined to serve a local function only;
and
WHEREAS, Revocation of "County Road" status may be accomplished by resolution
of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioner pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 163.11;
and
WHEREAS, It appears to the City Council of the City of Maplewood that the
street hereinafter described upon turnback from Ramsey County should be designated
Municipal State Aid Streets under the provision of Minnesota'Law; and
WHEREAS, The consolidated plan stipulates that Ramsey County shall improve
these roadways to acceptable levels prior to transferring jurisdiction over
roadway segments from Ramsey County to municipalities, and the Ramsey County
Capital Improvement Program provides funding for these improvements; and
WHEREAS, Ramsey County performed a recycle and overlay of Jackson Street from
Larpenteur Avenue to Roselawn Avenue, McKnight Road from Minnehaha Avenue to Case
Avenue, and McMenemy Street from Larpenteur Avenue to County Raod B in 1998; and
WHEREAS, These segments of Jackson Street, McKnight Road, and McMenemy Street
have been improved by Ramsey County to an acceptable level prior to the transfer
of roadway jurisdiction as calculated from the pavement condition rating of the
1997 Ramsey . County Pavement Management System, therefore exempting Ramsey County
from providing any compensation from the Roadway Consolidation Fund to the City of
Maplewood for this ,jurisdiction transfer; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, The City of Maplewood does hereby concur with
the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners revoking the "County Road" status of
Jackson Street (County Road 138) from Larpenteur Avenue to Roselawn Avenue,
McKnight Road (County Road 158) from Minnehaha Avenue to Case Avenue, and McMenemy
Street County Road 140) from Larpenteur Avenue to County Raod B and transfers
jurisdiction over these roadways to the City of Ma lewood effective the first day
of the first month following completion of the sea coat of Roselawn Avenue and
Stillwater Avenue and after the Ramsey County Office of Budgeting and Accounting
has encumbered the finds necessary to fund these sealcoat projects, and after the
County is in receipt of an adopted resolution from the City of Maplewood
concurring with the County revoking the "County Road" status of Jackson Street
from Larpenteur Avenue to Roselawn Avenue, McKnight Road from Minnehaha Avenue to
Case Avenue, and McMenemy Street from Larpenteur Avenue to County Raod B; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon turnback to the City of Maplewood from
Ramsey County the segments of Jackson Street from Larpenteur Avenue to Roselawn
Avenue, McKnight Road from Minnehaha Avenue to Case Avenue, and McMenemy Street
from Larpenteur Avenue to County Raod B, be and are hereby established, located
and designed as Municipal State Aid Streets of said City, subject to the approval
of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The Maplewood Engineer is authorized within the limits
of this resolution to take actions necessary to have the identified jurisdictions
changes executed.
99 -06 -58
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, The 1991 Minnesota Legislature established a Ramsey County Local
Government Services Study Commission to "report on the advantages and
'disadvantages of sharing, -- ,cooperating, restructuring: or consolidating..."
activities in areas of public service including public works; and
WHEREAS, The consolidation plan provides for reclassification of roadways and
corresponding changes in jurisdiction including the transfer of local and State
Aid roadways between the County and municipalities; and
WHEREAS, Ripley Avenue (County Road 121) from White Bear Avenue to North St.
Paul Road, located in the City of Maplewood, are presently under the jurisdiction
of Ramsey County as County Road; and
WHEREAS, . This roadway has been determined to serve a local function only; and
WHEREAS, Revocation of "County Road" status may be accomplished by resolution
of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioner pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 163.11;
and
WHEREAS, It appears to the City Council of the City of Maplewood that the
street hereinafter described upon turnback from Ramsey County should be designated
Municipal State Aid Street under the provision of Minnesota Law; and
WHEREAS, The consolidation plan stipulates that Ramsey County shall improve
the roadway to acceptable levels prior to transferring jurisdiction over roadway
segments from Ramsey County to municipalities, and the Ramsey County Capital
Improvement Program provides funding for these improvements; and
WHEREAS, The City of Maplewood desires to reconstruct Ripley Avenue from White
Bear" Avenue to North St. Paul Road and fund the reconstruction project with
Municipal State Aid Street sources, andup to $170,000 from Capital Improvement
Fuhds for Ramsey County Roadway Consolidation;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, The City of Maplewood does hereby concur with
the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners revoking the "County Road" status of
Ripley Avenue (County Road 121) from White Bear Avenue to North St. Paul Road and
transfers jurisdiction over these roadways to the City of Maplewood effective the
first day of the first month following completion of the construction of Ripley
Avenue from White Bear Avenue to North St. Paul Road and after the Ramsey County
Office of Budgeting and Accounting has encumbered the finds necessary to fund
these sealcoat projects, and after the County is in receipt of an ado ted
resolution from the City of Maplewood concurring with the County revo ing the
"County Road" status of Ripley Avenue (County Road 121) from White Bear Avenue to
North St. Paul Road; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the County wil pay to the City as just
com ensation for this jurisdiction transfer, up to $170,000 upon presentation of
bil ings from the construction contractor for the Reconstruction of this segment
of Ripley Avenue, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon turnback to the City of Maplewood from
Ramsey County the segments of Ripley Avenue from White Bear Avenue to North St.
Paul Road, be and are hereby established, located and designed as Municipal State
Aid Streets of said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of
Transportation of the State of Minnesota; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, The Maplewood Engineer is authorized within the limits
of this resolution to take actions necessary to have the identified jurisdictions
changes executed.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
2. County Road D Speed Limit
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
b. City Engineer Haider presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Carlson moved to establish a 30 mph speed zone on County Road D from
White Bear Avenue to Bellaire Avenue and moved its adoption:
Seconded by Councilmember Kittrdige Ayes - all
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Bob Zick, 1880 East Shore Drive commented on the conpost site and the
Liquor Referendum.
2. Ralph Sletten, 2747 Clarence Street comments on compost site.
3. Greg Blasdael, 2670 Clarence Street
4. Veronica Sletten, 2747 North
5. Ralph Sletten, repeat
6. Bob Zick, repeat
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Mayor's Mailbox will be on the July 12, 1999 agenda.
2. Historical Society will be on the July 12, 1999 agenda.
3. Community Center will be on the July 12, 1999 agenda.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
NONE
0. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Carlson moved to adjourn the meeting at 11:35 P.M.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
AGENDA NO. G -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: July 6, 1999
Attached is a listing of paid: bills for informational u oses The Cit p rp y Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City ouncil approved '
y pp ved policies .
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$342.66
Checks #7954 thru #7956 dated 6 -21 thru 6-24-99
$147,861.90
Checks #44414 thru #44527 dated 6 -29 -99
$39,878.35
Checks #7957 thru #7965 dated 6 -25 thru 6-30-99
0 99
$306,664.22
Checks #44530 thru #44615 dated 7 -6 -99
$494,747.13 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL:
$306,443.42 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 6 -2 -
p 5 99
$21,967.07 Payroll Deduction check #72866 thru #72874 d - -
dated 6 25 99
$328,410.49 Total Payroll
$823,157.62 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me a -
t 770 4513 if you have any
questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting
pporting documentation on
file if necessary.
hu
Attachments
C:I OFFICEIWPWIN\AGENDAWPPRCL06.JUL
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 1
06/25/99 10:55
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
7954
06/21/99
542660
MINNESOTA ZOO
ZOO ADMISSIONS
89.60
89.60
7955
06/23/99
890900
U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS
PAY TELEPHONES
181.66
PAY TELEPHONES
64.80
246.46
7956
06/24/99
900200
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
SHIPPING COSTS
6.60
6.60
44414
06/29/99
FREDRICKSON.,.PHYLLIS
REFUND- SPORTS SPECTACULAR
75.00
75.00
44415
06/29/99
BENDEL, JEAN
REFUND -HAVE A BALL
35.00
35.00
44416
06/29/99
YARUSSO, ROCHELLE
REFUND -SWIM
38.00
38.00
44417
06/29/99
BEDARD, ANDRA
REFUND -SWIM
38.00
38.00
44418
06/29/99
ZAMBRANO, TROY
REFUND -SWIM
38.00
38.00
44419
06/29/99
BERG, DIANA
REFUND - PROGRAM FEES
6.00
6.00
44420
06/29/99
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #284
REFUND-PROGRAM FEES
10.00
10.00
44421
06/29/99
010467
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
CELLULAR PHONE
110.96
CELLULAR PHONE
11.39
122.35
44422
06/29/99
010480
AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
RUBBISH REMOVAL
31.59
RUBBISH REMOVAL
31.59
RUBBISH REMOVAL
31.59
RUBBISH REMOVAL
31.59
RUBBISH REMOVAL
31.59
157.95
44423
06/29/99
010780
ADOLPHSON & PETERSON
30 E COUNTY ROAD B
18,162.50
30 E COUNTY ROAD B
3,378.67
21,541.17
44424
06/29/99
020000
ADVANCED GRAPHICS
TONER
108.63
TONER
69.23
TONER
69.23
INK CARTRIDGES
53.25
TONER
69.22
369.56
44425
06/29/99
020005
ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC.
DECAL LETTERING UNIT E3 & R3
873.30
873.30
44426
06/29/99
020870
ALLIED MEDICAL ACCTS CONTROL
COMMISSIONS - COLLECTION AGENCY
989.14
989.14
44427
06/29/99
021200
AMERICAN FASTENER OF MN, INC.
BRASS CONNECTORS,PLUG,WALL SHR
146.26
146.26
44428
06/29/99
021250
AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
MATS - POLICE
36.69
36.69
44429
06/29/99
021425
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
APA MEMBERSHIP -M LEDVINA
65.00
65.00
44430
06/29/99
030310
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
MINIOTR III PAGERS
1,236.60
MINITOR III PAGERS
1
2,473.20
1
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 2
06/25/99 10:55
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
44431
06/29/99
030660
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
ANIMAL CONTROL 6/5 - 6/15/99
795.98
795.98
44432
06/29/99
031213
APPLIED IMAGES
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
48.00
48.00
44433
06/29/99
041260
ASIAN AMERICAN PRESS
AD FOR POLICE OFFICER
94.25
94.25
44434
06/29/99
061700
BATTERIES PLUS
AUTO BATTERY
58.56
58.56
44435
06/29/99
071350
BETTENDORF ROHRER KNOCHE WALL
APPRAISAL SERV- BRADLEY OAKS PR
1
1
44436
06/29/99
071595
BITTNER, KATIE
WSI REIMBURSEMENT
46.88
46.88
44437
06/29/99
073975
BLAKE BUILDERS
2296 HOYT AVENUE E
1
2296 HOYT AVENUE E
16.71
1284 E COUNTY ROAD B
1
1284 E COUNTY ROAD B
12.05
2
44438
06/29/99
081250
BRAD RAGAN INC.
TIRES
190.46
190.46
44439
06/29/99
131734
CLARK, DAVID H
INSTALL OPTICOM -CHIEF 2 CAR
114.05
114.05
44440
06/29/99
151855
CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE
AD FOR BID - BRUENTRUP FARM
91.35
91.35
44441
06/29/99
161138
CREATIVE BENEFIT STRATEGIES, I
FEES - CONSULTING
1
1
44442
06/29/99
180800
DALCO
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
381.63
381.63
44443
06/29/99
190200
DEPT OF COMMERCE
NOTARY COMM RENEWAL -D DEHN
40.00
40.00
44444
06/29/99
200830
DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN
REIMBURSEMENT- MEALS,PARKING
51.60
51.60
44445
06/29/99
210350
DOZIER EQUIPMENT
TRUCK DRAWERS
474.75
SALES TAX PBL. OUT OF STATE
28.98-
445.77
44446
06/29/99
230745
EAGAN, CITY OF
DEPOSIT -GROUP RESERVATIONS
91.00
91.00
44447
06/29/99
230900
DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO.
COPIER USAGE FOR APRIL 1 99
112.20
COPIER USAGE FOR APRIL 1 99
112.20
COPIER USAGE FOR APRIL 1 99
3.70
COPIER USAGE FOR APRIL 1 99
144.95
COPIER USAGE FOR APRIL 1 99
301.99
COPIER USAGE FOR APRIL 1 99
268.40
COPIER USAGE FOR APRIL 1 99
63.99
COPIER USAGE FOR APRIL 1 99
123.45
COPIER USAGE FOR APRIL 1 99
300.14
COPIER USAGE FOR APRIL 1 99
248.56
1,679.58
44448
06/29/99
231585
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
QUICK TIF 2.0 UPGRADE
26.62
QUICK TIF 2.0 UPGRADE
26.62
QUICK TIF 2.0 UPGRADE
26.62
QUICK TIF 2.0 UPGRADE
26.63
2
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 3
06/25/99 10:55
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
QUICK TIF 2.0 UPGRADE
26.63
QUICK TIF 2.0 UPGRADE
26.63
QUICK TIF 2.0 UPGRADE
26.63
186.38
44449
06/29/99
240360
EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC.
TEST & INSPECT SIRENS
825.00
825.00
44450
06/29/99
240375
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
RPR & MAINT /R1
1 1 544.83
1 1 544.83
44451
06/29/99
250180
ERICSON, MICHAEL A
REIMBURSEMENT-PARKING
18.00
18.00
44452
06/29/99
250190
ESI CABLING SERVICES, INC.
ADD'L DATA JACK -COMM DEV
197.18
197.18
44453
06/29/99
300500
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
11.20
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
63.01
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
83.18
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
38.71
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
25.07
226.36
44454
06/29/99
301070
GALL'S, INC.
LIGHTBAR W/ACCESSORY PKG
769.96
769.96
44455
06/29/99
310710
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, INC.
MAY 1999 SERVICE
14.00
14.00
44456
06/29/99
320520
GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT
TRIMMER LINE
61.75
61.75
44457
06/29/99
330405
HAWKINS, LEO
CONCERT FEES
2
2
44458
06/29/99
350475
HILSON RESEARCH, INC.
SCANTRON ANSWER SHEETS
1.35
REPORT SERVICE
108.00
109.35
44459
06/29/99
370100
HUTCHINSON, ANN
TURTLE FOOD,WORMS,PENCILS
48.14
POLAROID FILM
29.93
78.07
44460
06/29/99
410152
K.D. HOMES
2431 LINWOOD CT E
1
2431 LINWOOD CT E
16.71
1,016.71
44461
06/29/99
410370
KATH COMPANIES
STEER PUMP
92.52
BRAKE PADS
43.40
BATTERIES,BULBS
274.59
LENS
18.02
428.53
44462
06/29/99
420150
KINKO'S CUSTOMER ADM SERVICES
PRINTING -MID SUMMER NITES
142.28
WORK ORDERS
69.23
211.51
44463
06/29/99
430350
GECC/KNOX LUMBER
CEDAR DECK BOARDS
46.49
46.49
44464
06/29/99
430970
KRECH'S BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
REPAIR & MAINT /PRINTERS
278.63
278.63
44465
06/29/99
450185
LABOR ALL
JANITORIAL SERIVES THRU 6/14
51.48
51.48
44466
06/29/99
450481
LANDMARK, INC.
2384 NEBRASKA AVE
1
3
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 4
06/25/99 10:55
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
2384 NEBRASKA AVE
84.93
2458 ARLINGTON AVE E
1
2458 ARLINGTON AVE E
36.16
2448 ARLINGTON AVE E
1
2448 ARLINGTON AVE E
33.15
2431 TEVLLIN CT E
1
2431 TEVLLIN CT E
8.90
4,163.14
44467
06/29/99
460560
LEDVINA, MATTHEW
REIMBURSEMENT-CONF & REG FEES
36.5 0
36.50
44468
06/29/99
460800
LESCO, INC.
ROUNDUP PACKETS
389.96
389.96
44469
06/29/99
470700
LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS
AD FOR POLICE OFFICER
238.80
238.80
44470
06/29/99
500800
M.T.I. DISTRIBUTING CO.
PTO FORK
52-58
52.58
44471
06/29/99
501250
MAD SCIENCE OF MINNESOTA
SCIENCE CLASS FEES
209.00
209.00
44472
06/29/99
510500
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
BIRTHDAY PARTIES
68.75
68.75
44473
06/29/99
511175
MARDI ASSOCIATES
AD IN WEDDING GUIDE
300.00
300.00
44474
06/29/99
520500
MCGUIRE, MICHAEL
REIMBURSEMENT-MEALS,PARKING
66.00
66.00
44475
06/29/99
530500
MENARDS
HARDWARE FOR FLOATING DOCK
97.22
97.22
44476
06/29/99
530730
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
TITAN RIMS
493.24
493.24
44477
06/29/99
540840
MINN CITY /COUNTY MGMT ASSOC.
MEMBERSHIP -M MCGUIRE
98.72
98.72
44478
06/29/99
542140
MINNESOTA FIRE SERVICE
CERTIFICATION TEST -F DALY
35.00
35.00
44479
06/29/99
542200
3M
BUS LANE MARKINGS- CONWAY
789.04
BUS LANE MARKING- CONWAY
789.04
1
44480
06/29/99
542345
MINNESOTA PHOTO
FILM PROCESSING
5.74
FILM PROCESSING
47.83
FILM PROCESSING
35.41
88.98
44481
06/29/99
630949
NEEDELS JANITOR SUPPLY
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
54.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
79.88
134.28
44482
06/29/99
660800
NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF
UTILITIES
1
UTILITIES
218.29
UTILITIES
178,05
UTILITIES
223.87
2
44483
06/29/99
661108
NORTH STAR WIPER & INDUSTRIAL
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
388.73
388.73
44484
06/29/99
661600
NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO.
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
42.96
42.96
4
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 5
06/25/99 10:55
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
44485
06/29/99
661755
NORTHERN STATES POWER
UTILITIES
233.04
UTILITIES
28.95
UTILITIES
1
UTILITIES
7
UTILITIES
21.58
9
44486
06/29/99
670950
NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC
MAPLEWOOD IN MOTION-JULY
1
GREEN INSERT
623.00
RED CROSS Y2K BROCHURE
159.00
2,537.08
44487
06/29/99
680575
OCCUPATIONAL HLTH SERV/ALLINA
PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
186.50
PREEMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
1
PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
78.50
PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
61.50
PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
61.50
PREEMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
61.50
PRE - EMPLOYMENT. PHYSICALS
61.50
PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
123.00
PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
122.00
2
44488
06/29/99
690340
OLSON, ARNOLD G
REIMBURSEMENT-MILEAGE
63.28
63.28
44489
06/29/99
700800
PAPER WAREHOUSE, INC.
BALLOONS,CUPS,PLATES,NAPKINS
106.43
106.43
44490
06/29/99
711670
PIONEER GRAPHICS INC.
K-9 JAKE TRADING CARDS
110.00
110.00
44491
06/29/99
740800
RADIO SHACK
BATTERIES,MISC EQUIP
78.56
78.56
44492
06/29/99
741200
RAINBOW FOODS
SUNNY D,COKE,PEPSI,MT DEW,7 -UP
378.89
378.89
44493
06/29/99
741600
RAMSEY COUNTY - PRRREV
MAY 1999 COMPUTER USAGE
1.43
MAY 1999 COMPUTER USAGE
4.39
MAY 1999 COMPUTER USAGE
841.34
847.16
44494
06/29/99
742525
RASSETT, LEO
TREE REMOVAL- DRAINAGE EASEMENT
600.00
600.00
44495
06/29/99
742760
RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING CO INC
K-9 EQUIPMENT
238.11
SALES TAX PBL. OUT OF STATE
13.31-
224.80
44496
06/29/99
750600
RENNIX CORPORATION
400 SERIES HIGH PRIORITY EMITT
802.16
802.16
44497
06/29/99
761200
ROAD RESCUE LAW ENFORCEMENT
LIGHT W /SWITCH
13.95
13.95
44498
06/29/99
780295
S & D DOOR REPAIR, INC.
RPR DOOR FRAME -POOL AREA
376.50
376.50
44499
06/29/99
780300
S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
46.56
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
24.25
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
24.24
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
8.56
EASEL
216.23
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
79.16
399.00
5
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 6
06/25/99 10:55
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
44500
06/29/99
780600
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
40.43
TAFFY,AIRHEADS,CRACKERS,CHIPS
85.26
125.69
44501
06/29/99
790700
SCZULIN, JERRY
REIMBURSEMENT-SUPPLIES /STAT 2
39.18
39.18
44502
06/29/99
800180
SEMPLE BUILDING MOVERS, INC.
1/2 PMT FOR MOVING BRUENTRUP F
44,500.00
44,500.00
44503
06/29/99
800460
SERVICE SALES CORP.
TOM TICKETS
255.73
255.73
44504
06/29/99
810620
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
REIMBURSEMENT - MEALS /MEDIC SCHO
21.24
21.24
44505
06/29/99
820505
SMITH, SANDY
REIMBURSEMENT- PARKING
9.00
REIMBURSEMENT - MILEAGE
13.44
22.44
44506
06/29/99
830240
SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEMS
WHITE PAINT
89.46
89.46
44507
06/29/99
831400
SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC.
NEIGHBORHOOD POLICING SUPPLIES
253 .33
253.33
44508
06/29/99
840403
ST. PAUL, CITY OF
TUITION-FTO SCHOOL
1,185.00 .
1 1 185.00
44509
06/29/99
842303
STAR TRIBUNE
AD FOR POLICE OFFICER
351.00
351.00
44510
06/29/99
843537
STRATUS COMPUTER, INC.
JUNE HARDWARE /SOFTWARE MAINT
2
2
44511
06/29/99
843575
STREICHER'S
F.P. SUPPLIES
50.96
50.96
44512
06/29/99
850395
SUNRAY B -T -B
WIX FILTERS
43.36
43.36
44513
06/29/99
851575
SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.
INK CARTRIDGES
440.69
440.69
44514
06/29/99
860320
T.R.F. SUPPLY CO.
SPRAY GREASE
84.14
SAFETY SUIT
8.56
92.70
44515
06/29/99
860410
TSE INC.
JANITORIAL SERVICES 4/22 - 5/19
637.20
637.20
44516
06/29/99
860725
TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
PHONE SUPPORT - MAY
67.20
67.20
44517
06/29/99
861615
THE DRAMA KIDS
DRAMA CAMP WEEK 1
775.00
775.00
44518
06/29/99
861666
THE METAL DOCTOR
POST HOLDERS
273.20
273.20
44519
06/29/99
861669
THE MOBILE PHONE COMPANY
INSTALL CELL PHONE -M4
128.14
128.14
44520
06/29/99
861673
THE SCHOOL NATURE AREA PROJECT
CONF REG-V GAYNOR
20.00
20.00
44521
06/29/99
880555
TRI- DISTRICT 6067 SCHOOL
30 E COUNTY ROAD B
18,162.50
30 E COUNTY ROAD B
3
21,511.32
44522
06/29/99
880750
TROY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
367.11
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
243.97
611.08
�l
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 7
06/25/99 10:55 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
44523 06/29/99 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
44524 06/29/99 900173 UNITED HOSPITAL
44525 06/29/99 911600 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
44526 06/29/99 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P.
44527 06/29/99 989005 ZWIEG, SUSAN
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
PRE-PLACEMENT EXAMS
PRE - PLACEMENT EXAMS
BRONCO WORK GLOVES
COMMERICAL PLUMBING INSPECTION
DEFFERRED REVENUE - PLBG.PERMIT
PLUMBING
REIMBURSEMENT- MILEAGE
TOTAL CHECKS
I TEM
AMOUNT
192.49
224.00
56.00
39.60
87.65
109.57
109.57-
15.68
CHECK
AMOUNT
192.49
280.00
39.60
87.65
15.68
148,204.56
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
07/02/99 13 :42
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
PAGE 1
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
CHECK
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
7957 06/25/99
190400
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE
359.00
359.00
7958 06/25/99
300550
GE CAPITAL
COPIER LEASE PMT -MAY
35 .29
COPIER LEASE PMT -MAY
35.29
COPIER LEASE PMT-MAY
1.26
COPIER LEASE PMT -MAY
45.5 9
COPIER LEASE PMT -MAY
94.99
COPIER LEASE PMT -MAY
84.23
COPIER LEASE PMT -MAY
20.13
COPIER LEASE PMT -MAY
38.83
COPIER LEASE PMT -MAY
94.42
COPIER LEASE PMT -MAY
78.29
528.32
7959 06/28/99
550150
MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION
A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE
141.76
141.76
7960 06/28/99
943500
WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVENUE
WISCONSIN SWT -JUNE 1999
897.0 4
897.04
7961 06/29/99
630018
NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
PERA LIFE INS
225.00
225.00
7962 06/29/99
900274
UNITED WAY OF THE ST. PAUL
UNITED WAY DED PAY-2ND QTR
1,133.90
1,133.90
7963 06/29/99
722200
P.E.R.A.
PERA DED PAY-KOPPEN
16.53
PERA CONTRIBUTIONS - KOPPEN
16.53
33.06
7964 06/29/99
722200
P.E.R.A.
PERA DEDUCTION PAYABLE
15,837.12
PERA CONTRIBUTIONS
20,373.15
36,210.27
7965 06/30/99
842502
STATE OF MINNESOTA CPV PROGRAM
STATE CPV MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
350.00
350.00
TOTAL CHECKS
39,878.35
8
VOUCHRE2
07/02/99 12:58
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
VOUCHER
/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
AMOUNT
44530 07/06/99
SCHOENHEIDER, VIRGINIA
REFUND -AMB 99011022
591.76
44531
07/06/99
JENSEN, DONITA
REFUND - GARDEN PLOTS
17.00
44532
07/06/99
ZAWISLAK, ELIZABETH
REFUND -AMB 98020386
354-45
44533
:07/06/99
010464
A T & T
CELLULAR PHONE
1.25
44534
07/06/99
010467
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
CELLULAR PHONES
261.95
CELLULAR PHONES
52.19
CELLULAR PHONES
11.75
CELLULAR PHONE
11.39
44535
07/06/99
010468
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
ERICSSON CELL PHONE BATTERY
317.73
44536
07/06/99
020370
AICHELE, CRAIG
REIMBURSEMENT- SAFETY BOOTS
45.00
44537
07/06/99
020411
'AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE CELLULAR PHONE
10.12
CELLULAR PHONE
20.30
; ON CELLULAR PHONE
56.96 -
CELLULAR PHONE
192.51
44538
:07/06/99
020925
ALL SEASONS GOLF DOME OF
40 ADMISSIONS
240.00
44539
07/06/99
021250
AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL
SER MATS - PUBLIC WORKS
15.98
44540
07/06/99
030310
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
SOFTWARE FOR PROGRAMMING PAGER
376.69
RPR & MAINT /MINITOR II
126.53
44541
07/06/99
030725
ANKENY KELL ARCHITECTS
PROF SERV -MCC EXPANSION
2
44542
07/06/99
041500
ASPEN MILLS
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
332.00
44543
07/06/99
060090
BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB
TUITION - ALDRIDGE
40.00
TUITION -BELDE
40.00
TUITION - BERGERON
40.00
TUITION - FRASER
40.00
TUITION- HALWEG
40.00
TUITION- THOMALLA
40.00
TUITION- STEFFEN
40.00
TUITION- THIENES
40.00
TUITION - ERICKSON
40.00
TUITION - YOUNGREN
40.00
TUITION -HEINZ
40.00
TUITION - HIEBERT
40.00
TUITION-JOHNSON
40.00
TUITION-MEEHAN
40.00
TUITION - MELANDER
40.00
TUITION RABBETT
40.00
44544 07/06/99
061700
BATTERIES PLUS
CHARGER,BATTERIES
158.12
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
591.76
17.00
354.45
1.25
337.28
317.73
45.00
165.97
240.00
15.98
503.22
2,563.50
332.00
640.00
158.12
9
VOUCHRE2
07/02/99 12:58
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
44545 07/06/99
44546 07/06/99
44547 07/06/99
44548 07/06/99
44549 07/06/99
44550 07/06/99
44551 07/06/99
44552 07/06/99
44553 07/06/99
44554 07/06/99
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
PAGE 2
FOR PERIOD 06
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
CHECK
AMOUN T
AMOUNT
080925
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
UTILITIES
73.26
UTILITIES
9.05
UTILITIES
21.73
UTILITIES
97.77
201.81
081230
BOYER TRUCK PARTS
VEHICLE
84,791.58
84 1 791.58
- 110325
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS
REPAIR & MAINT /RADIO
206.40
06
2 .40
120525
CENTURY COLLEGE
PROF DEV TRAINING -J HEWITT
49.00
49.00
152400
COPY EQUIPMENT, INC.
PINK SURVEY PAINT
45.43
WHITE SURVEY PAINT,ERASERS
92.40
137.83
161300
CROSSON, LINDA
REIMBURSEMENT - OFFICE SUPPLIES
43.79
REIMBURSEMENT - MILEAGE
17.92
61.71
170200
%CUB < FOODS - MAPLEWOOD EAST
SUPPLIES- EQUIP/AIR 1
59.77
59.77
170900
D & D TOWING SERVICE INC.
DRILL CAR
47.93
DRILL CAR
47.93
TOW -SQUAD 956
90.53
DRILL CAR
95.85
DRILL CAR
95.85
DRILL CAR
95.85
DRILL CAR
47.93
DRILL CAR
47.93
569.80
210878
DUELLMAN, KIRK
REIMBURSEMENT- MEALS,LODGING
280.96
REIMBURSEMENT - MILEAGE
96.32
377.28
230900
DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO.
TONER
23.90
TONER
23.90
TONER
.79
TONER
30.88
TONER
64.34
TONER
57.18
TONER
13.63
TONER
26.30
TONER
63.95
TONER
52.97
TONER
23.90
TONER
23.90
TONER
.79
TONER
30.88
TONER
64.34
TONER
57.18
TONER
13.63
TONER
26.30
TONER
63.95
TONER
52.97
715.68
10
VOUCHRE2
07/02/99 12:58
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
PAGE 3
FOR PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
44555 07/06/99
230960
ECOPRINT
BUSINESS CARDS
119.82
LETTERHEAD -FIRE MARSHALL
118-59
BUSINESS CARDS
38.77
277.18
44556 07/06/99
240380
EMERGENCY. AUTOMOTIVE
TECH, INC RPR & MAINT /SQUAD 947
86.35
86.35
44557 07/06/99
300500
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
37.60
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
37.63
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
37.60
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
38.75
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
11.20
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
85.50
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
74.13
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
38.71
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
25.07
391.38
44558 07/06/99
310150
GONYEA HOMES
2440 TEVLIN CT E
11000.00
2440 - TEVLIN CT E
30.41
1
44559 07/06/99
320501
GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC. TUITION /HALE & EVERSON
370.00
370.00
44560 07/06/99
340103
HEIM, ANDREA
EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENTS
31.25
31.25
44561 07/06/99
350470
HIEBERT, STEVEN
JUNE K-9 RETAINER
35.00
35.00
44562 07/06/99
351300
HORSNELL, JUDITH
REIMBURSEMET-FUEL
35.45
35.45
44563 07/06/99
370075
HUGO'S TREE CARE
TREE /BRUSH REMOVAL
21722.78
2
44564 07/06/99
370080
HUPPERT, ERIN
EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENTS
31.25
31.25
44565 07/06/99
380820
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
DEVELOPER
130.14
DEVELOPER
32.54
COPIER LEASE
341.01
COPIER LEASE
85.25
588.94
44566 07/06/99
401670
JOLLY TYME FAVORS
BALLOONS
2.94
2.94
44567 07/06/99
410152
K.D. HOMES
2667 FIFTH AVENUE E
1
2667 FIFTH AVENUE E
75.07
1,075.07
44568 07/06/99
410635
KEYLAND HOMES
2465 DAHL CIRCLE E
11000.00
2465 DAHL CIRCLE E
69.45
1
44569 07/06/99
420150
KINKO'S CUSTOMER ADM SERVICES PUBLISHING
145.39
PUBLISHING
230.97
376.36
44570 07/06/99
430350
GECC/KNOX LUMBER
4X6X8 TREATED LUMBER
25.82
25.82
44571 07/06/99
440110
KRINKIE HTG & AIR CONDITIONING RPR TO A /C- STATION 7
324.50
32 5
VOUCHRE2
07/02/99 12:58
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 4
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
CHECK
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
44572
07/06/99
440900
KVAM, DAVID
REIMBURSEMENT -POST LICENSE
45.00
45.00
44573
07/06/99
459500
LARRY'S LIVE BAIT &
SPORTING PROPELLER FOR BOAT /STAT 1
63.00
63.00
44574
07/06/99
460452
LEAGUE OF MINN. CITIES
1 YR SUBSCRIPTION- CITIES BULLE
25.00
1 YR SUBSCRIPTION- CITIES BULLE
15.00
40.00
44575
07/06/99
460800
LESCO, INC.
SWITCH
10.60
ROUND -UP PACKETS
292.47
303.07
44576
07/06/99
470660
LIGHTER ELECTRIC
LAUNDRY HOOKUP - STATION 1
165.00
LAUNDRY HOOKUP - STATION 4
165.00
330.00
44577
07/06/99
500651
M.R.P.A.
SOFTBALL STATE TOURNAMENT BERT
1 1 380.00 .00
1 1 380.00
44578
07/06/99
520500
MCGUIRE, MICHAEL
CAR ALLOWANCE -JULY
4 50.00
450.00
44579
07/06/99
530070
MEADOW VIEW HOMES
2516 BITTERSWEET LN N
5
0
2516 BITTERSWEET LN N
84.74
5
44580
07/06/99
530560
MERIT CHEVROLET
BLOWER MOTOR
92.81
92.81
44581
07/06/99
530755
METROCALL
DIGITAL PAGER
10.46
10.46
44582
07/06/99
531650
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
WASTEWATER SERVICE-JULY
158,128.5 7
158,128.57
44583
07/06/99
541915
MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION
FOR FALL CONFERENCE FEES
480.00
480.00
44584
07/06/99
542455
MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC DOCUMENT SHREDDING SERVICES
109.89
109.89
44585
07/06/99
570090
MOGREN BROS.
CEDAR MULCH
35.68
35.68
44586
07/06/99
630665
NAT'L FIRE PROTECTION
ASSN. MEMBERSHIP-B GERVAIS
115.00
TRAINING MATERIALS
235.95
NAT'L FIRE ALARM CODE
28.50
379.45
44587
07/06/99
660900
NORTH STAR TURF, INC.
PIN- JAC,SPACER
77.51
77.51
44588
07/06/99
661755
NORTHERN STATES POWER
UTILITIES
4.71
UTILITIES
5,909.85
UTILITIES
27.40
UTILITIES
115.53
UTILITIES
100.79
UTILITIES
140.55
UTILITIES
8.80
UTILITIES
7.40
UTILITIES
156.99
UTILITIES
160.82
UTILITIES
26.95
UTILITIES
17,362.14
24
12
VOUCHRE2
07/02/99 12:58
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 5
VOUCHER
/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER DATE
NUMBER
NAME
ITEM
CHECK
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
44589 07/06/99
691160
ON SITE SANITATION
SATELLITE SERVICE
151.30
151.30
44590 07/06/99
700735
PALMA, STEVEN T
JUNE K -9 RETAINER
35.00
REIMBURSEMENT - PLATFROM /SQD 945
34.96
REIMBURSEMENT -FUEL
10.00
REIMBURSEMENT- MEALS,LODGING
120.79
200.75
44591 07/06/99
711400.
PETSMART
DETOXIFIER,FILTERS CONDITIONER
37.75
37.75
44592 07/06/99
740290
RCCF GREENHOUSE /NURSERY
PARK PLANTINGS
344.14
344.14
44593 07/06/99
741600
RAMSEY COUNTY - PRRREV
PAINT CENTERLINES ON CITY ST
255.40
255.40
44594 07/06/99
750550
REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS BUNN COF FEEMAKER,FILTERS
280.86
280.86
44595 07/06/99
750600
RENNIX CORPORATION
400 SERIES HIGH PRIORITY EMITT
802.03
802.03
44596 07/06/99
770802
- RYDER -BUS- COMPANY
TRANSPORTATION FOR FIELD TRIP
253.00
253.00
44597. 07/06/99
780300
S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.
TICKETS -CITY PICNIC
6.70
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
71.04
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
74.70
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
88.80
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
47.80
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
19.77
308.81
44598 07/06/99
780450
SAFE ASSURE CONSULTANTS
SAFET TRAINING-P /W EMPLOYEES
276.75
SAFET TRAINING -P /W EMPLOYEES
476.63
SAFET TRAINING -P /W EMPLOYEES
307.25
SAFET TRAINING -P /W EMPLOYEES
307.25
SAFET TRAINING -P /W EMPLOYEES
169.12
11537.00
44599 07/06/99
780600
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
MDSE FOR RESALE -SNACK BAR
186.69
MDSE FOR RESALE -SNACK BAR
166.49
MEMBERSHIP -T KARAS
15.00
368.18
44600 07/06/99
840403
ST. PAUL, CITY OF
CRIME LAB SERVICES-MAY
165.00
165.00
44601 07/06/99
850340
SUMMIT INSPECTIONS
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
31012.80
.80
DEFERRED REVENUE ELEC.PERMIT
3,766.00
ELECTRIC PERMIT FEES
3,766.00-
31012.80
44602 07/06/99
850395
SUNRAY B -T -B
BELT TENS,FAN BELT,BLADE
113.86
BELTS
20.21
FAN BELT,BELT,BELT GAUGE
52.63
CREDIT-DAC CHANGEOVER
56.31-
130.39
44603 07/06/99
860080
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
714.93
ASPHALT,TACK OIL
184.65
ASPHALT
46.56
946.14
13
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
07/02/99 12;58 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER PAGE 6
FOR PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
44604
07/06/99
44605
07/06/99
44606
07/06/99
44607
07/06/99
44608
07/06/99
44609
07/06/99
44610
07/06/99
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
860650 TARGET STORES -CSA A/R
860710 TAYLOR, MARSHA
861617 THE ECONOMICS PRESS, INC.
861666 THE METAL DOCTOR
871600 TOUSLEY FORD, INC.
882000 TWIN CITY SAW & SERVICE CO
890900 U.S-WEST COMMUNICATIONS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PEPSI,MOUNTAIN DEW
FITNESS PROGRAM SERV -2ND QTR
SUBSCRIPTION-FIRST RATE CUSTOM
BALANCE OWING ON POST HOLDERS
LATCH ASY
ENGINE OIL,TRIMMER HEADS,LINE
PAY TELEPHONES
PAY TELEPHONES
PAY TELEPHONES
PAY TELEPHONES
RUBBISH REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOVAL
2523 MONTANA AVE E
2523 MONTANA AVE E
LIGHTS,COPPER WIRE
CABLE TIE
DUST MASK,EAR PLUGS,VESTS,GLAS
COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
DEFFERRED REVENUE - PLBG.PERMIT
PLUMBING
ITEM
CHECK
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
8.50
8.50
1
1
62.40
62.40
14.35
14.35
28.57
28.57
128.38
128.38
60.46
58.26
15.46
73.31
207.49
336.92
242.35
537.94
1,117.21
1,000.00
5.21
1,005.21
329.56
137.92
467.48
216.72
216.72
204.00
255.00
255.00-
204.00
44611 07/06/99 910500 VASKO 'RUBBISH REMOVAL
44612 07/06/99 910565 VENTURA HOMES
44613 07/06/99 911350 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
44614 07/06/99 911600 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
44615 07/06/99 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P.
TOTAL CHECKS
306,664.22
14
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ALLENSPACH, SHERRY
330965
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ANDERSON , CAROLE J
655,43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
DEHN, DEBORAH
1440992
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
CARLE r JEANETTE E
1444901
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
JAGOE CAROL
,
13 7 4.41
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
OLSON,SANDRA
855.70
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ALDRIDGE,MARK
2515.20
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
BOHL,JOHN C
2366.77
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
FLOR, TIMOTHY
2375.04
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
KVAM, DAVID
2116.7 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
EVERSON , PAUL
16 9 9.9 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
FRASER, JOHN
2147,26
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
OSWALD, ERICK D
155 3.52
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
DUCHARME , JOHN
16 2 6.5 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
PECK,DENNIS L
1769.72
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
GREW- HAYMAN,JANET M
807.40
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
EKSTRAND,THOMAS G
1781.72
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ROBERTS , KENNETH
1861927
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
TAYLOR, KATHERINE
3 2 8.2 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J
2 0 4 0.2 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
EDGE , DOUGLAS
14 4 6.8 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
LIVINGSTON , JOYCE L
788,72
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
KNAUSS,PETER
776,92
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
PALMA,STEVEN
2605.06
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
JOHNSON , KEVIN
2453,29
15
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
JENSEN, MATTHEW
13 2.8 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA A
2 5 2 7.9 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ROSSBACH, GEORGE
3 7 5.7 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
LUTZ,DAVID P
1649.62
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
SCHLINGMAN,PAUL
1757.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
FARR,DIANE M
205.07
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
VORWERK,ROBERT E
2043.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
NAGEL, BRYAN
1460.92
DIRECT DE POSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
HELLE , KERRY
219 2.0 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
CARVER, NICHOLAS N
17 4 8.9 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
OSTER, ANDREA J
14 2 0.9 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ANDREWS , SCOTT A
19 5 3 .6 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
RUNNING , ROBERT
13 9 2 .9 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
SAVAGEAU, STEPHEN D
12 7 6.12
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
BARTEL DENISE
2 0.5 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
CARLSON,DALE
330.65
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
MARTINSON,CAROL F
1661.87
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
HI EBERT , STEVEN
2 3 4 4.07
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
DUNN ,ALICE
2 66 2 .2 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ANZALDI , MANDY
5 8.7 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
CORNER, AMY L
12 9.5 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
HORSNELL r JUDITH A
7 8 3 .05
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
SEEGER,GERALD F
370916
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
MOREHEAD,JESSICA R
279.10
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
COLEMAN ,PHILIP
167o15
16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
---- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------ - - - - --
AMOUNT
-------- - - - - --
------ - - - - --
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
i
BELDE , STANLEY
215 5.7 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ATKINS , KATHERINE
9 0 0.2 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
FRY , PATRI CIA
1371932
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
RENSLOW, RITA
13 7.7 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06./25/99
BAKKE LONN A
17 0 4.21
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
BOWMAN,RICK A
2259.67
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
KOPPEN,MARVIN
330.65
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
CHRISTENSEN,JODIE D
738.89
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
KITTRIDGE,KEVIN L
330.65
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
WASH , MATTHEW G
2 5.13
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
PIKE , GARY K
17 01.5 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
I CKES , SHERI
1132o12
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
HEINZ , STEPHEN J
19 9 0.3 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
NELSON , JEAN
9 2 5.5 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
KELLY ,LISA
8 8 0.9 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
TETZLAFF,JUDY A
508930
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
URBANSKI,HOLLY S
1223.32
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ZWIEG,SUSAN C.
1394.52
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
BAUMAN , GAYLE L
2015,91
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
SMITH , CAS SANDRA L
1367991
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
SKRYPEK , JOSHUA L
7 7 4.7 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
HERBERT ,MICHAEL J
2044,21
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
STOCKTON DERRELL T
1954943
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
MELANDER,JON A
2343.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ROSSMAN,DAVID A
1954.75
DIRECT DEPOSIT
17
CITY OF
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
THOMAS -JR, STEVEN
1433,72
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
PRI EBE , WILLIAM
19 5 6.0 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
DOHERTY r KATHLEEN M
14 2 0.9 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES
1460992
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
RABBETT,KEVIN
2223.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
GRAF,MICHAEL
1106.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN
16 0 5.9 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
CARLSON , THERE S E
1805,15
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
LE, SHERYL
2890959
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
FAUST,DANIEL F
3242944
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
KELSEY , CONNI E L
6 2 7.5 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
GUILFOILE , KAREN E
13 8 3. 5 3.
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
POWELL r PHILIP
1632,34
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
WINGER,D O NALD S
3071.05
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/9.9
BANICK,JOHN J
2393.72
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
BECKER,RONALD D
2403.48
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
KARIS, FLINT D
2200.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
STEFFEN, SCOTT L
2545906
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
THOMALLA ,DAVID J
2 3 9 3.7 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
YOUNGREN , JAMES
2200983
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
BERGERON r JOSEPH A
2 4 3 8.17
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
HAIDER,KENNETH G
3166.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
PRIEFER,WILLIAM
1752983
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
KANE ,MICHAEL R
2054,43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
LUNDSTEN, LANCE
2282984
fE3
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
CAVETT ,CHRISTOPHER M
2 2 2 5.6 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ANDERSON , BRUCE
2 8 0 0.7 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
MARUSKA, MARK A
2054,43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
HUTCHINSON , ANN E
1712983
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
COLEMAN , MELINDA
2 8 5 9.0 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
CROSSON,LINDA
1566.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
EASTMAN,THOMAS E
2048.46
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
STAPLES,PAULINE
2307.20
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
HURLEY, STEPHEN
2107.79
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
GERVAI S —JR, CLARENCE N
16 5 6.2 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
HALWEG,KEVIN R
2889.84
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
OTI S, MARY ELLEN M
511.3 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
CASAREZ , GINA
12.2 8.12
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
JOHNSON , LO I S C.
4 4 0.31
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
MEYER GERALD W
1672922
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
PARSONS,KURT G
1390.16
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
JUNG,STEPHANIE J
1198.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
MARUSKA,ERICA
218.90
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
NORDQUI ST , RI CHARD
1509934
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
JACKSON , MARY L
1132o 12
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
GAYNOR, VIRGINIA A
9 4 9.7 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
ROBBINS , AUDRA L
1165,63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99 /25/99
LUKIN,STEVEN J
2038946
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
OLSON,JULIE S
1170940
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/25/99
SWANSON,LYLE
1554.87
DIRECT DEPOSIT
19
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - -
CHECK DATE
---- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
--
72675
06/25/99
- - - - --
ERICSON,MICHAEL A
--------- - - - - --
2181995
72676
06/25/99
MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A
4027957
72677
06/25/99
ZICK,LINDA
241950
72678
06/25/99
WHITE,BARRY T
50.00
72679
06/25/99
CUDE,LARRY J
376.53
72680
06/25/99
DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J
234948
72681
06/25/99
EDSON,KAREN L
760.00
72682
06/25/99
JACKSON,KIMBERLY A
625981
72683
06/25/99
SHELLEDY,DAWN M
624.00
72684
06/25/99
MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE
1567.25
72685
06/25/99
JOHNSON,BONNIE
838995
72686
06/25/99
VIETOR,LORRAINE S
1436914
72687
06/25/99
PALANK,MARY KAY
1649.89
72688
06/25/99
RICHIE,CAROLE L
1601998
72689
06/25/99
RYAN,MICHAEL
2774.41
72690
06/25/99
SVENDSEN,JOANNE M
1751.44
72691
06/25/99
BARTZ,PAUL
2549.31
72692
06/25/99
KONG,TOMMY T
783.86
72693
06/25/99
SHORTREED,MICHAEL P
1967.20
72694
06/25/99
SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J
1924.83
72695
06/25/99
WATCZAK,LAURA
1864.83
72696
06/25/99
WELCHLIN,CABOT V
1996.03
72697
06/25/99
HALE,THOMAS M
1495.82
72698
06/25/99
MEEHAN,JAMES
2127.40
72699
06/25/99
THIENES,PAUL
2510.35
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
72700
06/25/99
MONROY,JON J
126.50
72701
06/25/99
SCHADT,JEFFREY A
55.00
72702
06/25/99
HEWITT,JOEL A
2740.62
72703
06/25/99
CHLEBECK,JUDY M
1473.72
72704
06/25/99
CHRISTENSEN,DANIEL G
180900
72705
06/25/99
DARST,JAMES
735.32
72706
06/25/99
FREBERG,RONALD L
1488.12
72707
06/25/99
JONES,DONALD R
1095.30
72708
06/25/99
WESTERHAUS,KEVIN M
720.00
72709
06/25/99
CORWIN,ERIC B
427.88
72710
06/25/99
ELIAS,JAMES G
1769.72
72711
06/25/99
KUNO,MICHAEL R
509.25
72712
06/25/99
LINDBLOM,RANDAL
1674.52
72713
06/25/99
ANDERSON,ROBERT S
1460992
72714
06/25/99
CASAREZ,SCOTT J
565.13
72715
06/25/99
EDSON,DAVID B
1496912
72716
06/25/99
FENGER,JUSTIN R
529900
72717
06/25/99
HELEY,ROLAND B
1488.12
72718
06/25/99
HINNENKAMP,GARY
1446.68
72719
06/25/99
LAVAQUE,MICHAEL
1433972
72720
06/25/99
LINDORFF,DENNIS P
1460.92
72721
06/25/99
NAUGHTON,JOHN W
912.25
72722
06/25/99
PATTERSON,TERRILL T
420.00
72723
06/25/99
POSSERT,RYAN
648.00
72724
06/25/99
RASMUSSEN,TIMOTHY J
643.50
21
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
72725
06/25/99
MACY,RITA
234.00
72726
06/25/99
MCCUSKER,ELIZABETH A MANNING
150.88
72727
06/25/99
SOUTTER,CHRISTINE
121.88
72728
06/25/99
THOMPSON,DEBRA J
452.85
72729
06/25/99
WEGWERTH,JUDITH A
1394.52
72730
06/25/99
SCHMIDT,JASON E
1188.47
72731
06/25/99
ANDERSON,EVERETT
499.21
72732
06/25/99
OLSON,ARNOLD G
560.00
72733
06/25/99
OSTROM,MARJORIE
2 129.63
72734
06/25/99
WENGER,ROBERT J
1737972
72735
06/25/99
BALLESTRAZZE,THAD M
468.11
72736
06/25/99
BRANDSTROM,RYAN M.
169.00
72737
06/25/99
BUSMAN,CHRISTINA M
229.50
72738
06/25/99
DEVRIES,LINDSAY
305.25
72739
06/25/99
DICKSON,WARREN C.
60.00
72740
06/25/99
FINN,GREGORY S
1260.03
72741
06/25/99
FLUG,ELAINE R
310.25
72742
06/25/99
FLUG,MEGAN L
206.25
72743
06/25/99
FRANK,LAURA
178.00
72744
06/25/99
LINN,TERI L
31.50
72745
06/25/99
MILES,ADAM J
15.00
72746
06/25/99
NIEMCZYK,BRIAN N
60900
72747
06/25/99
NORGAARD,BETHANY J
199.50
72748
06/25/99
NORMAN,KENDALL A
127.50
72749
06/25/99
PREW,JOHN M
500.50
22
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
- - -
CHECK DATE
---- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
-
------ - --
72750
06/25/99
- - - - --
PRIEFER,BRIAN
-------- - - - --
292.50
72751
06/25/99
RAS,BRENT A
132.00
72752
06/25/99
ST'IEN,KARIN M
152.00
72753
06/25/99
STIEN,NATHANIEL
304.00
72754
06/25/99
VOGEL,PAUL R
49.80
72755
06/25/99
ZIELINSKI,JOSEPH R
33.00
72756
06/25/99
BREHEIM,ROGER W
1646.04
72757
06/25/99
GERMAIN,DAVID
1490.88
72758
06/25/99
NADEAU,EDWARD A
2054.43
72759
06/25/99
SCHULTZ,SCOTT M
1278.54
72760
06/25/99
COONS,MELISSA
715.49
72761
06/25/99
GLASS,JEAN
723.09
72762
06/25/99
GOOD,TARYN M
6:0.75
72763
06/25/99
HOIUM,SHEILA
889.56
72764
06/25/99
HORWATH,RONALD J
549.26
72765
06/25/99
KARAS,TAMARA A
650.14
72766
06/25/99
KEELING,SARAH B
123.50
72767
06/25/99
NEAMY,MARK W
197.20
72768
06/25/99
SCHMIDT,RUSSELL
1145.63
72769
06/25/99
SCHOEBERL,KAYLENE M
313.52
72770
06/25/99
SHOBERG,CARY J
434.77
72771
06/25/99
ABRAHAMSON,BRYAN K
359.54
72772
06/25/99
ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L.
271.25
72773
06/25/99
ANDERSON,JULIE M
402.28
72774
06/25/99
BADEN,MATHIAS
481.10
23
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
72775
06/25/99
BITTNER,KATIE C
418989
72776
06/25/99
CHAPMAN,JENNY A
530925
72777
06/25/99
CONLIN,PAMELA
82920
72778
06/25/99
COOPER,JOSEPH W
399.45
72779
06/25/99
DAMROW,KELLY C
52.00
72780
06/25/99
DEMPSEY,BETH M
167.73
72781
06/25/99
DeGRAW,KRYSTAL M
176.85
72782
06/25/99
ERICKSON,CAROL A
40.00
72783
06/25/99
FONTAINE,ANTHONY
162.36
72784
06/25/99
FREEMAN,LAURA A
156.00
72785
06/25/99
FRETZ,SARAH J
367.25
72786
06/25/99
GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C
78.84
72787
06/25/99
HAFNER,ALEXIS J
112.99
72788
06/25/99
HAGSTROM,LINDSEY S
30.88
72789
06/25/99
HAWKE,RYAN A
226992
72790
06/25/99
HAWKINS,LISA A
59.35
72791
06/25/99
HEDLUND,LAUREL R
178.75
72792
06/25/99
HEIM,ANDREA J
20,10
72793
06/25/99
HEINN,.REBECCA L
286.30
72794
06/25/99
HOLMGREN,LEAH M
116.33
72795
06/25/99
HOULE,DENISE L
197.18
72796
06/25/99
HUPPERT,ERIN M
285,37
72797
06/25/99
IKHAML,JOHN
680.70
72798
06/25/99
JENSEN,SUSAN K
22.43
72799
06/25/99
JOHNSON,MEGAN M
219.38
24
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
72800
06/25/99
JOHNSON,ROBERT P
384.30
72801
06/25/99
JOHNSON,ROLLAND H
136.50
72802
06/25/99
JOHNSON,STETSON
60.75
72803
06/25/99
KERSCHNER,JOLENE M
27963
72804
06/25/99
KOEHNEN,AMY
54.00
72805
06/25/99
KOEHNEN,MARY B
422913
72806
06/25/99
KOEPKE,CHARLES E
63.38
72807
06/25/99
KUHL,SCOTT A
68.25
72808
06/25/99
MALONE,BRANDON M
302.25
72809
06/25/99
MOTZ,ERIN M
246923
72810
06/25/99
O'REAGAN,CHRISTINE
40.00
72811
06/25/99
OLSEN,CALEB J
29.25
72812
06/25/99
OSTEBO,BARBARA C
36.23
728.13
06/25/99
PEHOSKI,JOEL T
141.38
72814
06/25/99
POWERS,JESSICA
495913
72815
06/25/99
SACKMANN,LAURA C
375.23
72816
06/25/99
SCHLUETER,LOUISE E
37900
72817
06/25/99
SCHROEDER,KARI B
188.50
72818
06/25/99
SHERRILL,MASON D
318.10
72819
06/25/99
SIMONSON,JUSTIN M
595900
72820
06/25/99
SMITLEY,SHARON L
169940
72821
06/25/99
SWANER,JESSICA
252.45
72822
06/25/99
TIBODEAU,HEATHER J
62.65
72823
06/25/99
TOURTELOTTE,MARYN J
58.50
72824
06/25/99
TROENDLE,ALEISHA M
13.20
25
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
72825
06/25/99
WARNER,CAROLYN
102.30
72826
06/25/99
WEDES,CARYL H
124.13
72827
06/25/99
WHITE,TIMOTHY M
137.55
72828
06/25/99
WILLIAMS ,KELLY M
793920
72829
06/25/99
WOODMAN,ALICE E
223.21
72830
06/25/99
ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L
203.13
72831
06/25/99
BOSLEY,CAROL
114.00
72832
06/25/99
DISKERUD,HEATHER A
175.55
72833
06/25/99
FLEMING,KATHY A
262.50
72834
06/25/99
GLASS,GILLIAN
296.60
72835
06/25/99
HANSEN,ANNA K
6.00
72836
06/25/99
KOHOUTEK,APRIL L
100.50
72837
06/25/99
LYNCH,KATHARINE R
42900
72838
06/25/99
PRICE,JENNIFER L
14.63
72839
06/25/99
SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN
160.00
72840
06/25/99
SHERRILL,CAITLIN A
48.00
72841
06/25/99
SPANGLER,EDNA E
155.40
72842
06/25/99
ANTON,SARAH E
126.00
72843
06/25/99
BEHAN,JAMES
1228.12
72844
06/25/99
BLAKESLEY,JEFFRY D
128900
72845
06/25/99
BLANCHARD,KEVIN J
36900
72846
06/25/99
CALLEN,KATIE E
37.80
72847
06/25/99
CHAPEAU,GREG M
242955
72848
06/25/99
FULLER,AMY R
44910
72849
06/25/99
GRENDZINSKI,DIANE J
114.00
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
72850
72851
72852
72853
72854
72855
72856
72857
72858
72859
72860
72861
72862
72863
72864
72865
CHECK DATE
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
06/25/99
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------ - - - - --
AMOUNT
--------
HEMPFER,NICHOLAS W
- - - - --
36.00
JAHN,DAVID J
1342.40
KOSKI,JOHN F
562.66
KYRK,BREANNA K
126.92
LONE 4 I, JAMES F
5 2 9.3 4
MATTESON,FRANK M
56.70
MORIN,TROY J
150.00
PRINS,KELLY M
183.00
REILLY,MICHAEL R
483.20
SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M
195.30
STEINHORST,JEFFREY
262.75
SWANSON,VERONICA
926.92
YOUNG,DILLON J
99.84
AICHELE,CRAIG J
797954
MULVANEY,DENNIS M
1628912
PRIEM, STEVEN A.
1325940
306443.42
WA
AGENDA CO 4ZOO
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael McGuire, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: July 7, 1999
RE: Hideaway Liquor License
dCtion by Council:
Z 'tdorsed�
uoairfea.-
ReJe�te�
D$t,
In anticipation of selling his establishment, James L. Tulgren, owner of the Hideaway Lounge
located at 70 East County Road B, is surrendering his liquor license to the city.
No Action is Necessary
AGENDA NUMBER CV3
Act on by Cd
AGENDA REPORT �dorso��
Yod
TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager
FROM: Paul Schlingman, Chief Building Engi e
RE: Refrigerant Leak
DATE: June 24, 1999
INTRODUCTION:
The A/C unit that serves the Police Department has developed a leak in a refrigerant line. Staff
called Cramer Building Services out on Monday June 7th 1999. The technician found a leak in the
receiver's relief plug.
BACKGROUND:
On Friday June 4th, 1999, staff detected a low refrigerant condition in the 80 ton Air
Conditioning Unit. Suspecting a leak we called out a service technician. The service technician
found the leak. He charged the unit to get us by until we can evacuate the system and repair the
leak. The estimated time to repair the unit is eight hours. I have attached a copy of the estimate to
complete this work. Included is the amount it will cost to perform the work during off hours.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council approve the transfer of 1,225.00 dollars from the
contingency account to the Building Maintenance, Repair and Maintenance Equipment Account;
101 -115- 000 - 4430. These dollars will cover the cost of the repair during working hours.
Agenda item
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand — Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CUP Revision, Parking Reduction Authorization and Building Design
Approval— Menard's ActiOn b LOCATION. 2280 Maplewood Drive .
DATE: June 30, 1999 Xndoxse
itodir
INTRODUCTION J9eJ ecte DatAq
Project Description
Greg Ewig, of Menard's, Inc, is proposing to build a 33,769- square -foot retail addition on the
north side of the Menard's store. Refer to the maps on pages 11 -13. The exterior is proposed
to be of brick - imprinted, precast concrete wall panels. The brick imprinting in the concrete
panels is intended to match the brick on the existing building.
The parking lot north of the existing building would be eliminated and the northerly 30 feet of the
site, north of the proposed addition, would be restored with grass and trees. The applicant
proposes to close their northeasterly curb cut north of the building and replace it with a new one
in line with the front (west side) of the building. The applicant would also build a 149 -space
parking lot in the southwest corner of their site north of Citgo.
This proposal would restore 43,743 (1.004 acres) square feet of bituminous surface with grass
and trees (7.5 percent of the site area). Refer to the site plan.
Requests
Ivif. Evvig is requesting approval of:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) revision to enlarge the building and amend the site plan.
Refer to the letter on pages 14 -15. The code requires a CUP to expand a project for which a
CUP exists.
2. Aparking - reduction authorization for 258 spaces. The code requires 717 spaces (29 for the
indoor warehouse and 688 for indoor retail space); Menard's is proposing 459 parking stalls.
(Staff's calculations differ from the applicants.) Refer to the letter on page 16.
3. Site and building design plans.
DISCUSSION
CUP Revision, Citizen Comments and Termination of Greenhouse Approval
CUP
The proposed expansion meets the requirements for a CUP and improves the overall site. it will
also lessen the impact to the adjacent residential neighborhood.
Citizens Comments
The applicant held an informational meeting with the neighborhood on May 13, 1999. The issues
raised were about the screening fence, parking lot lighting, drainage and overnight parking of
semi trucks. Refer to the letter on page 17.
Menard's has agreed to provide a 14- foot -tall screening fence in areas where the fence is only 10
feet tall. They have also agreed to install curbing in the proposed parking lot west of the storage
yard which should prevent semi - truck access through this parking lot. Refer to the parking -lot
curbing addendum on page 16. The new site lights would also be of a design to prevent light
spillover. Menard's will also work with staff and the Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed
District regarding drainage.
Greenhouse
In 1996, the city council revised the CUP to allow a temporary, seasonal greenhouse west of the
outside storage yard. The greenhouse never began operation and is in the location of the
proposed 149 -space parking lot. Presently this is an unused paved area. The city council should
revise the CUP and terminate this greenhouse as part of this permit since this part of the site is
needed for parking and was never used for the greenhouse.
Parking
The applicant is requesting a 33 percent reduction in the number of required parking spaces.
This is substantial, but Menard's has gotten by, essentially, with the main parking area in front of
the building since 1988. The parking north of the building has always been used for the north -
facing businesses in this building, not by Menard's customers. The proposed retail addition
would need 169 spaces according to the code. The easterly parking lot and the proposed
149 -space parking lot would total 180 spaces which would provide enough parking for this new
retail space.
The area west of the storage yard is in serious need of repaving. The applicant should.do this as
part of their curbing and striping proposal for the new parking lot.
Site Drainage /Shoreland Requirements
The site is within the shoreland boundary of Keller Lake. Presently the site has 95 percent
impervious - surface coverage. The shoreland code requires a maximum coverage of 40 percent.
This site has been developed to this extent since the 1960s. Staff is happy to see the applicant
propose to restore an acre of bituminous surface to grass and landscaping which would improve
storm runoff quality.
Pat Conrad, of the Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District, may want the applicant to
provide a stormwater holding pond in the proposed green area north of the gas station. A
watershed district permit is required for this project.
Building Design Concerns
On June 22, the community design review board (CDRB) recommended approval of the
proposed brick - imprinted, precast concrete exterior. The board felt that it was better to allow a
complementary material than a not -exact match if brick was used on the addition. The board
2
also recommended that the addition extend two feet to the west of the existing west face of the
building since the mortar joints of the existing brick and the embossed joints of the precast
panels would not line up.
Landscaping and Screening Fence
The proposed landscaping would enhance the site. The tree sizes, however, do not meet code.
The proposed spruce trees must be increased from four to six feet tall and the deciduous trees
must be increased from 1 %2 inch caliper to 2 %2 inch caliper.
The applicant proposes to replace the ten - foot -tall sections of fence on the south and east sides
of the site with 14- foot -tall sections to match the existing 14- foot -tall sections. Mr. Ewig also
proposes to replace the 14- foot -tall westerly fence on the storage yard that is in disrepair. Refer
to page 18. Time has shown that the plywood fencing material on the west side of the storage
yard has not held up. Staff recommends that all fencing material to be installed match.
Fire Marshal's Concern
The perimeter of the building must be kept accessible for fire emergencies. The applicant should
arrange with the fire marshal for access through the gate behind the building in the case of
emergencies.
City Engineer's Comment
Menard's should provide a gate and clear access to the sanitary sewer manhole on the site as
part of this request.
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
June 21,1999: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP revision.
June 22, 1999: The CDRB recommended approval of the parking waiver and the plans.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 20-22 approving a conditional use permit revision for a
33,769 - square -foot addition at 2280 Maplewood Drive. The city bases this approval on the
findings required by the code. Approval of this CUP revision is subject to the following
conditions (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out):
1. Adherence to the site plan date - stamped May 5, 1999. , LIKow
. The director of community development may approve
minor changes.
2. Compliance with the following screening -fence requirements:
a. The property owner shall continue to have and keep, in a maintained condition,
wooden screening - fences as follows:
3
The eight- foot -tall screening fence west of 1071 County Road B and running east -
west behind 1071, 1081 and part of 1101 County Road B shall remain.
,) All other screening fences that abut the residential lots shall be 14 feet tall.
All screening fences shall be constructed of vertical boards of the same
dimension, color and material.
24P66 ebou .66 shn 66—
.
•
.
.
.
b. No material on the storage racks, adjacent to the fence behind 1101 and 1115 County
Road B, shall extend above the 14- foot -tall fence.
c. No more than 2 1 /2 feet of the 17 ' /z- foot -tall interior storage racks shall be visible from
the homes to the south that are at street level along County Road B. This excludes
those houses that sit higher on a hill.
d. Menard's shall be responsible for the safety of the neighbors in regard to the
materials stored over the height of the fence.
3. Hours of operation in the storage yard shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
4. An exterior public address system shall not be allowed.
5. All lighting in the storage yard that is not needed for site security shall be turned off after
business hours.
6. The city council shall review this permit in one year if the proposed retail -space addition
has not begun
7. Plowed snow shall be stored away from the southern and eastern property lines to avoid
runoff problems on residential property.
8. Menard's shall store all their materials within the fenced storage area. —Pfau
9. Sanitation facilities shall be provided by Menard's for the employees.
4
plomnlft4 ---J
'64F 041 MICA04 6
10. The proposed building addition and site work must be substantially started within
one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may
extend this deadline for one year.
11.� This permit terminates the approval for the temporary, seasonal greenhouse.
12. The perimeter of the building must be kept accessible for fire emergencies. The
applicant shall arrange with the fire marshal for access through the gate behind the
building in the case of emergencies.
B. Approve a parking- reduction authorization for Menard's at 2280 Maplewood Drive to have
258 spaces fewer than the code requires. (The code requires 717 spaces on the site -29 for
the indoor warehouse and 688 for indoor retail space. Menard's is proposing 459 parking
stalls.) Approval is because:
1. The required number of spaces is excessive. Menard's has gotten by, essentially, with
the main parking area in front of the building since 1988. Menard's customers do not
typically use other available parking areas on the site.
2. The proposed retail addition would need 169 spaces according to the code. The existing
easterly parking lot and the proposed 149 -space parking lot (totaling 180 spaces) would
provide enough parking for the new retail space.
C. Approve the plans date- stamped May 5, 1999, and the parking -lot curbing addendum date -
stamped May 14, 1999, for the 33,769- square -foot addition to Menard's, 2280 Maplewood
Drive. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. - Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall:
a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to the city engineer for
approval.
b. Revise the building elevations to extend the front (westerly) elevation of the proposed
addition two feet to the west of the existing wall. The applicant shall use brick -
imprinted, precast concrete panels, as proposed, on all sides of the proposed
addition. The color shall be complementary to the brick color of the existing building
and submitted to staff for approval. The applicant shall also revise the window
mullion spacing to align with the precast panel joints.
c. Revise the site and landscape plans for staff approval as follows:
(1) Provide enough handicap - accessible parking spaces to comply with ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements.
(2) Increase the tree sizes to six - feet -tall for the spruce trees and 2' /Z inches in
caliper for the deciduous trees.
3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Close the existing curb cut north of the building with continuous concrete curbing,
remove the asphalt and landscape according to the approved plan. The proposed
access driveway and curb cut shall meet all requirements of the city engineer.
b. Menard's shall provide a gate and clear access to the sanitary sewer manhole on the
site as part of this request.
c. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter all around the new parking lot west of
the outside- storage yard. The applicant shall also provide the curbed medians as
shown on the addendum and repave this entire area.
d. Paint new rooftop mechanical equipment to match the building color if the units are
visible. (code requirement)
e. The trash - dumpster screening requirement is waived unless the dumpsters would be
visible to the public. In which case, an enclosure shall be provided using the same
materials and color as the building.
f. An inground lawn- irrigation system shall not be required for the landscaped area in
the southwest corner of the site. The applicant shall install an in- ground lawn
irrigation system for the landscaped area north of the building.
g. Provide site - security lighting as required by the code. The light source, including the
lens covering the bulb, shall be concealed so not to cause any nuisance to drivers or
neighbors.
h. Replace all of the ten -foot -tall screening fence with 14 -foot -tall vertical -board fencing.
The applicant shall also replace the screening fence on the west side of the outdoor
storage yard with 14- foot -tall, vertical board fencing.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work.
The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished
landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or
winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
on
6. Signs are not part of this approval. The applicant shall submit any requests for signs to
staff for sign permits.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
I surveyed the 22 surrounding property owners within 350 feet of Menard's for their opinion of this
request. I received three replies.
1. Looks and sounds like a great idea! I should bring more people into the community and
probably create more jobs. I'm all for it. Thank you. (Peter Schmalz, Country Side
VW /SAAB)
2. 1 think the proposal will increase the appearance of the area in a positive manner. I also think
it will be an improvement to get the merchandise Menard's sells into their building. I hope the
proposal is accepted. (Jim Velenziano, Jim and Lori's Embers)
3. 1 have no opinion, whatever you recommend will be fine. (Holly Scott, 1203 Lark Avenue)
8
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 13.48 acres
Existing land use: Menard's
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Highway 36
South: Single dwellings and Citgo Motor Fuel Station
West: Highway 61
East: Countryside VW /SAAB
PAST ACTIONS
March 28, 1988: The city council approved Menard's CUP and granted a parking reduction
authorization.
January 23, February 13, March 27 and April 6,1989: The council changed the CUP conditions.
The changes were to clarify the screening fence and storage rack height requirements.
March 26,1990: The council reviewed the CUP.
November 14, 1994, and September 11, 1995: The council amended the CUP conditions.
April 8,1996: The council amended the CUP conditions because of a request for a seasonal,
14 rNor greenhouse and plant sale operation.
May 20,1996: The council again reviewed the CUP and directed Menard's, Citgo, staff and the
neighbors to meet and discuss several issues raised by one of the neighbors. These issues
were regarding the need for an additional screening fence, engine noises, fumes, parking and
cross traffic between Citgo and Menard's.
August'12, 1997: The council reviewed the CUP again. The previous concerns and problems
have been resolved. The council moved to review the CUP again only if a problem develops.
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: M -1 (light manufacturing)
Zoning: M -1
9
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36- 448(b) requires an amended CUP for any enlargement or intensification of use of an
existing CUP.
Section 36 -22(a) requires parking for Menard's at the ratios of one space for each 200 square
feet of retail space and one for each 1000 square feet of warehouse space.
Section 25 -70 requires that the community design review board (CDRB) make the following
findings to approve plans:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring,
existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of
investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the
use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not
create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of
the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive
development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan.
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good
composition, materials, textures and colors.
Findings for CUP Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states the city council must base their approval of a CUP on nine standards.
Refer to the resolution beginning on page 20.
p:sec9\menards.99
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line / Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Applicant's Conditional Use Permit Justification dated May 4, 1999
5. Applicant's Parking Waiver Justification dated May 4, 1999
6. Applicant's Letter to Mr. Valento dated May 14, 1999
7. Fence Layout Plan
8. Parking Lot Curbing Addendum date - stamped May 14, 1999
9. CUP- Revision Resolution
10. Plans date - stamped May 5, 1999 (separate attachment)
10
Attachment 1
3 4 . ,o .
2 1. SUMMIT CT.
�� •:�� �'�` 2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR. ._
3. DULUTH CT. 6
,• ' Z C � p 4. LYDIA ST. to
.w • BEAM •1VE. . •� �� 9EAM
2880N •' • •. •.
• • . • .. /-
c^ K
o T t °o I
U � /'
r X 22 ' / i 3
LLJ
o % z N .
Kohlmon g �' W ♦'' '
N
Gervis' .� Loke
U i
Loke 4 / �COHLMAN AVE
J' ROAD C W '
2 6 4 0 N � ,,outvTY /` _
. .
I PLAZA CIR 23 ' i ( 5 t TOP
2 AL OR PALM Cr z W '
3 BEL LECRE.ST DR CV • I ? , �`EN �" Z
1
5 wER10i W DR `' P or 1 c 5 3 ° Cl W'
C NOR
•• CONNOR , Co A� � ON AVE
O CT. NZ � j �,
DEMO N.t BROOKS
22 t ASE.
cr .---0 T
o 1 BROOKS C /J �" SEX : TA
C ., .
�2 /
fiF GERVAIS AVE. ♦ S GER
2 40 0 N << GRANOVIEtiv '
E` V + A
:' • co PKWY
CD VIKING D!
• � ' to
..�• SHERREN AVE.
t; Kr
•. .. ,,.A F OP COPE r
�- �� J LARK _� W AVE.
to t,- k
Keller
� VIKING DR. f o < ( = c�
,IE >, �► �: Lai l W 6� Loke Co. RD. N ,� v LAURIE RD.
RD.', a , w o ��� I I.ELAND RD. W = '
�,.' ' W c SANDH JRST
'—' •t� � , or z ; Ll1t1RIE CT. �� °� Z 0
< ZS �. JUNC N AVE. W z 8 ' •
;n a <
N x BURKE CT. 0 ° a ' • BURKE AVE. o
' BURKE AV O E AVE. m
I � "� ' 1) ST o 1) R AVE. 0 Floft ° z 1 ELDRIDGE AV r 4 Mp I to IDGE W
AV { E. o
of �• � A� ' BELMONT I AVE. '
` W �' ene BELMONT (,q COURSE
�� E. _
N v R GOJ SKILL �' AV ! SKILL MAN AVE•
AVE. w SKILIMAN Av. Hgo
KENW OOD KEU� = S !
,58
LA.
J W , R^(1U� V�'*� RYI AN AV.
►- '3' o
1 m W
z 1'R�'IL m c c
:RNON AV ' W ~
Q W' W 1
Gomm f p� !� a ! � v 0 2b 27 �— � FROST �` u' o �., Ln
W R SE LAWN O O
26 BELLWOOD AVE. I �., ! FE NTON AVE. z z
AVE. W
0 62 .� v _
p O a O O <! Z L MER AV E. �-
' SUMMER O 01 < 3 J o ° •�4
o ' w ; 3 GOR�D N FRISBIE AV
ac CT. N z z .� DO N �• �
LOCATION MAP
11
U
N
Attachment 2
Mal
wwwwo-- K��
4ft
ex %
�iw
............
0:x:
%
...................
........ ..
%
.... ...... . ... ... .... ....
.....% >
..........
. .........
%
..........
X ......
-X.. •
f. {' f'�•d .. {" t . ;/ ,, s � } '• {•:. J r, r•'• { .�r.Y� :: 'r' "..., .: � i .r f.:,}?ti: r. .?Sf i
.............
. { 5{• {� 1 v{ r . iY} }:¢. %
..........
• �f ., � ......... .
X,X ... :0
� X , Xn>>
; ^e 'Xlx
�vX.Y.
X "
U-SWE'Em
/ O
I S 7
Z
2223
41
1174
.33 A-C „Q;
-,
PROPERTY L /ZONING MAP
12
0
0 Sr
.300 ac
p
.4CITGO
140
U-SWE'Em
/ O
I S 7
Z
2223
41
1174
.33 A-C „Q;
-,
PROPERTY L /ZONING MAP
12
Attachment 3
slow I
, qft o ct t ollf"m r[wf I V(
24 SM100
E , K I'm I
AW rlN&V &�i I I I tllLwii
( mil l
Ms?" visit"
..40
SITE PLAN
13
i
N
PROPOSED ADDITION
Attachment 14
May 4, 1999
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Menards Conditional Use Application
�, , ,� , .r ,, _• ..
h
•t ; : 4
r•• S
Menard, Inc. is proposing to expand its existing home improvement center located
at 2280 Maplewood Drive. As you may already be aware, a previous attempt was
rejected. Our new proposed addition seeks to strike a balance between neighborhood
concerns and our interests in bringing this store closer to the standards of our newer
prototype stores and to allow us to compete more effectively with our competitors.
Our new proposal provides:
1. A 33,769 sq. ft. addition of heated sales area will be constructed on the
northern side of the existing building. This will allow us to move many
bulkier outdoor items indoors and expand our aisles for the convenience
and comfort of our customers. Located to the north of the existing
building, the addition will be well- removed from the residential area and
in a more commercial- oriented zone. The addition would conform with the
present zoning and character of the area.
2. A northern entrance point will be relocated slightly to the southwest to
provide better access and traffic flow and lessen the burden on the
entrances closer to the residential area.
3. New greenspace and landscaping will be added in front of the addition to
improve the look of the store from Highway 36.
4. The existing screening fence along the southerly side of the yard will be
replaced with a new fourteen foot high wood screening fence. This will
greatly improve the appearance of the existing fence and help to mitigate
sound levels for the neighbors.
0
1960. ,� 39
th 1999
7 Anniversary m
� 5
e4 i�d pmer�
14
4777 MENARD DRIVE EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 -9625 TELEPHONE (715) 876 -5911 FAX: 715- 876 -5901
•I j9
City of Maplewood
May 4, 1999
Page 2
5. A new 149 space parking area will be constructed southwest of the yard
area. New landscaping and green space will be created to act as
a buffer zone between the neighbors and the parking lot.
We believe that with these new improvements, we will make a safer, more
aesthetically appealing store that will mutually benefit the city, the neighbors and our
company's interests. The new addition is specifically designed to compliment our
existing use while attempting to accomodate concerns expressed by our neighbors.
Thank you for your consideration.
0
39
15 `1960 _
th 1999
'�� Anniversary
4777 MENARD DRIVE EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 -9625 TELEPHONE (715) 876 -5911 FAX: 715- 876 -5901
Attachment 5
May 4, 1999
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Parking Waiver for Menards Store Proposed Addition
MAY 0 .j 1999
. .
Menards seeks a parking waiver for the proposed addition. Presently, our store has
355 spaces. With the addition, we plan to add 88 more spaces for a total of 443. Under
the code:
Retail = 1 space per 200 sq. ft of retail space
Warehouse = 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of warehouse space
With the new addition, our intent is to add many larger items that currently may
be found in the warehouse. In essence, we will be treating the addition as a hybrid use -
part retail /part warehouse. As a result, we believe that utilizing the warehouse code
requirements would be more applicable when calculating required parking for the
addition. Thus, under this approach:
Retail space: 94,219 sq. ft. (471 spaces)
Warehouse: 28,917 sq. ft.( 29 spaces)
Addition: 33,769 so. ft. ( 34 spaces)
Total Needed: 534 spaces
Total Proposed: 443 spaces
(91) spaces
Menard, Inc. seeks a waiver of the remaining 91 spaces. There are several reasons
to support our request. First, our present parking has served us well since our
establishment in 1989. With the addition, we are already proposing to add an additional
88 spaces to our site. Second, in using the indoor addition space, we are essentially
reallocating our space to more efficient, better uses. The layout (we hope) will induce
customers to buy more, not necessarily that more customers will shop at Menards. Lastly,
our parking requirements are offset by customers using the lumber yard area.
Thank you for your consideration.
0
` 1960 m 3 th 1999
'°—• Anniversary D
16
4777 MENARD DRIVE EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 -9625 TELEPHONE (715) 876 -5911 FAX: 715- 876 -5901
Attachment 6
George Valento
1081 E County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Thank you for meeting with Jeff Gresmer and myself yesterday evening. I believe we
had a good discussion about the issues we need to address during our approval process for the
proposed expansion.
In response to the issues raised during the course of the meeting, I can tell you that:
1. Menards prefers to construct a 14' high screening fence along the entire length * of the
yard wall so as to make it of uniform height, material and with a uniform roof to protect our
product and to limit stacking height.
2. As I mentioned, we intend on installing parking lot lights that direct light downward
and limit light bleedover to adjacent residential property. The new light poles will be 30' tall
which will match the same height as the existing lights.
3. Regarding drainage on the proposed parking area, we will need to discuss drainage
requirements with the city before we can fully address this issue.
4. Regarding the semi parking issue, I believe a solution would be to construct the
employee parking lot with curbing between the parking stalls. The curbing would make it next to
;?"possible for semis to maneuver and park.I have enclosed a : evised sate flan which shows the
curbing.
5. When appropriate, you may contact Jeff to arrange a time to clean up scrub and debris.
I believe that with the new addition and these improvements, our store and your
neighborhood will continue to strike a workable, livable balance. If you have concerns as we
move forward in this process, you may contact me at 715 -876 -2828. I will do my best to address
or. answer your concerns or may direct Jeff to do his best to address them.
Sinc ely,
Gregory ig
Real Esta e Associate
Menard, Inc.
0
.'`t3
i geo 1. J
Anniversary t
IV
4777 MENARD DRIVE EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 -9625 TELEPHONE (715) 876 -5911 FAX: 715- 876 -5901
Attachment 7
PROPOSED ADDITION
14 -FOOT -TALL FENCE IN DISREPAIR
TO BE REPLACED WITH 14 -FOOT -TALL FENCE
,M.
rM6 rtwt A Kamp
fli vet mat M KnM
t� i 1rARrrt
14 -FOOT -TALL FENCE TO BE
REPLACED WITH 14- FOOT -TALL FENCE
FENCE LAYOUT PLAN
0
4
N
8 -FOOT -TALL FENCE TO REMAIN AS IS
Attachment 8
EXISTING TREES
EXISTING ACCESS
o QAbi
10
13
�
Ole )X
%0000e EXISTING FIRE
1
u
Cep
oe
9
SP E to
®®oes0eloos®®®® ®®®®lo®®e Igo o 00000000
a SAW
CD
1 0,
EXISTING TREES
EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN
i
EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN
® f%Y 1 4 1999
U-1i
PARKING LOT CURBING
ADDENDUM
19
4
N
Attachment 9
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Greg Ewig, of Menard's, Inc, is proposing changes to a conditional use permit to
build a 33,769- square -foot addition on the north side of the building at 2280 Maplewood Drive.
The legal description is:
SUB TO ESMTS; PART OF FOL TRACTS SELY OF HWYS 36 & 61; EX S 100 FT PART OF SW
1/4 N OF CO RD B & PART OF SE 1/4 W OF CLIFTON ADD S OF L 107 FT N OF S L OF BLK
15 OF SD ADD EXTENDED & N OF HEINEMANS BELLEVIEW & IN CLIFTON ADD, EX E 240
FT; BLKS 15 & 16 & EX E 255 FT BLK 10& ALSO W 120 FT OF E 255 FT OF N 30 FT OF
BLK 10
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 21, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this permit.
2. On July 12, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or Other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
20
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Adherence to the site plan date - stamped May 5, 1999. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. Compliance with the following screening -fence requirements:
a. The property owner shall continue to have and keep, in a maintained condition,
wooden screening- fences as follows:
(1) The eight - foot -tall screening fence west of 1071 County Road B and running east-
west behind 1071, 1081 and part of 1101 County Road B shall remain..
(2) All other screening fences that abut the residential lots shall be 14 feet tall.
(3) All screening fences shall be constructed of vertical boards of the same
dimension, color and material.
b. No material on the storage racks, adjacent to the fence behind 1101 and 1115 County
Road B, shall extend above the 14- foot -tall fence.
c. No more than 2 1 /z feet of the 17 Y/- foot -tall interior storage racks shall be visible from
the homes to the south that are at street level along County Road B. This excludes
those houses that sit higher on a hill.
d. Menard's shall be responsible for the safety of the neighbors in regard to the
materials stored over the height of the fence.
3. Hours of operation in the storage yard shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
4. An exterior public address system shall not be allowed.
5. All lighting in the storage yard that is not needed for site security shall be turned off after
business hours.
6. The city council shall review this permit in one year if the proposed retail -space addition
has not begun.
7. Plowed snow shall be stored away from the southern and eastern property lines to avoid
runoff problems on residential property.
8. Menard's shall store all their materials within the fenced storage area.
9. Sanitation facilities shall be provided by Menard's for the employees.
10. The proposed building addition and site work must be substantially started within one
year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may
extend this deadline for one year.
11. This permit terminates the approval for the temporary, seasonal greenhouse.
21
12. The perimeter of the building must be kept accessible for fire emergencies. The
applicant shall arrange with the fire marshal for access through the gate behind the
building in the case of emergencies.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on July 12, 1999.
22
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JUNE 21, 1999
VI. NEW BUSINESS
B. Menards Conditional Use Permit Revision (2280 Maplewood Drive)
Melinda Coleman, director of community development, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Trippler was concerned about the amount of traffic congestion at the intersection
of County Road B East and Maplewood Drive. He envisioned most of the traffic exiting from the
south, if the parking spaces on the north are removed, which will increase the severity of this
problem. Ken Haider, city engineer, said a recent project involved the various property owners
in an attempt to arrive at a better solution for movement of traffic at this corner. The best
solution, according to Mr. Haider, would be to move the frontage road further east. The cost
would be excessive and the city is not prepared to make that much investment. He felt "the
direction of approach to Menards is probably more defined by where people are coming from,
rather than where they are parking."
Chairperson Fischer stated that a provision for additional parking, if needed in the future, is
usually a condition for a parking variance. This condition was not included for Menards.
Ms. Coleman wasn't sure where parking could be added but said this condition could be
included. Commissioner Rossbach recommended against having this requirement included. He
felt it was better to have the landscaped area.
Commissioner Ledvina pointed out a conflict in the recommendation where, in one place, no
material would be allowed to extend above the fence and, in another, Menards is to be
responsible for neighbor safety in regard to materials stored over the height of the fence. Ms.
Coleman thought the intention was that nothing would be allowed over 14 feet.
Commissioner Rossbach commented that this was a much better plan that the one previously
submitted. He anticipated that there could still be a problem with semi trucks parking in the lot
at the southwest corner. Ms. Coleman said that Menards worked with the nearby residents to
find a solution to this problem. She has not received any complaints about the noise from the
trucks in over a year.
Gregory Ewig of Menards was present. Mr. Ewig clarified that the pallet rack and fencing is 14
feet tall and there is a roof - screening structure that limits stacking above the 14 feet. He said it
was a consensus at the neighborhood meeting that the curbing in the southwest parking lot
might deter semis from parking in this area. Mr. Ewig said they anticipated having some
employee parking in the spaces on the east side of the building.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit revision for a 33,769-
square -foot addition at 2280 Maplewood Drive. The city bases this approval on the findings
required by the code. Approval of this CUP revision is subject to the following conditions
(additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out:
1. Adherence to the site plan date - stamped May 5, 1999. ,
. The director of community development may approve
minor changes.
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 06 -21 -99
2. Compliance with the following screening -fence requirements:
a. The property owner shall continue to have and keep, in a maintained condition,
wooden screening- fences as follows:
III I I 'Nr wi
All ling
Jill 11111 5111111 1 11 1111 1 1IJI M ! IM E I f=- I I
PM
NMI lip
g A
oo,
I WIN
- - - - - - -- - - - -- - -- -- - - -
.-Will-
- - - - -
LIFTIMI-Tt2w
- -
:.:
3M E��1111 ISM
- - -- - - :
- :
- --
- III 2W LW - I 10 L 9 111 I�I III I 0 0 WMA&W1 :.
N 1kXW IN E WiW I
::
own WAS III
b. No material on the storage racks, adjacent to the fence behind 1101 and 1115
County Road 6, shall extend above the 14- foot -tall fence.
c. No more than 3 %2 feet of the 17 Y2 foot -tall ' storage racks shall be visible from
the homes to the south that are at street level along County Road B. This excludes
those houses that sit higher on a hill.
d. Menard's shall be responsible for the safety of the neighbors in regard to the
materials stored over the height of the fence.
3. Hours of operation in the storage yard shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
4. An exterior public address system shall not be allowed.
5. All lighting in the storage yard that is not needed for site security shall be turned off after
business hours.
6. The city council shall review this permit in one year if the proposed retail -space addition
has not begun.
7. Plowed snow shall be stored away from the southern and eastern property lines to avoid
runoff problems on residential property.
8. Menard's shall store all their materials within the fenced storage area. Mail P180ml
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 06 -21 -99
9. S
1 ow ner • % JFW1 QLVI Ql . % JVIUIU • % Jl C OLIC • • . • ul I I IIL, 1% VU VGlllU
Gil • Ulopla
- - - - • E 0% 1 - • 2 A - M 2 &W1 - 0 - - - - -- - W N ON - • W M • - -- - -
10. The proposed building addition and site work must be substantially started within one
year of .council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may
extend this deadline for one year.
lit
The niter o-7fte buildo?c�
anpl shall arranue with the fore marshal for access throuoh the oate behind the
B. Approve a parking- reduction authorization for Menard's at 2280 Maplewood Drive to have
258 spaces fewer than the code requires. (The code requires 717 spaces on the site 29
for the indoor warehouse and 688 for indoor retail space. Menard's is proposing 459 parking
stalls.) Approval is because:
1. The required number of spaces is excessive. Menard's has gotten by, essentially, with
the main parking area in front of the building since 1988. Menard's customers do not
typically use other available parking areas on the site.
2. The proposed retail addition would need 169 spaces according to the code. The existing
easterly parking lot and the proposed 149 -space parking lot (totaling 180 spaces) would
provide enough parking for the new retail space.
Commissioner Thompson seconded.
Commissioner Rossbach asked for confirmation that A.2.c. is changed to 3 %2 feet. This was
confirmed.
Ayes all
The motion passed.
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JUNE 22, 1999
VI. DESIGN REVIEW
A. Menard's Expansion Proposal Menard, Inc., 2280 Maplewood Drive
Secretary Tom Ekstrand presented the staff report. He said the applicant held a
neighborhood meeting and there was no opposition from the neighbors. Gregory Ewig, of
Menards, showed some materials that they are considering using. He said, after internal
discussions, Menards would like to put the brick on the front facade of the building, buff
aggregate precast panels along Highway 36, and match the painted cinder block on the back
of the structure.
Mr. Ewig said they will structure, repave, and stripe a parking area southwest of the building.
He pointed out that the watershed district may require Menards to put in a detention pond.
Menard's civil engineer is working to determine if this is feasible and, if so, how it would work.
Boardmember Robinson asked about the space occupied by Keller Lounge and the adjoining
hall. Mr. Ewig said these spaces are owned by Menards and the lease for them expires on
December 31, 1999. The construction of this new addition would begin in 2000. It was
decided that there is some brick on the back of the existing building. Mr. Ewig thought the
trash dumpster was now in the back of the building. He said they are not proposing to
change the location because noise from material being deposited in the dumpster could be
disruptive to a nearby residential area.
Boardmember Shankar suggested precast of a complimentary color, not matching the brick,
on the west, northwest and east sides and all around the building. If this option is chosen,
Mr. Shankar felt the face of the brick and the precast should not line up (either the existing
wall or the new wall should be offset about two feet). He said if the new brick matches the
existing exactly, then the wall would not have to be stepped. Secretary Ekstrand preferred
not to see a jog in the sidewalk if the building wall was offset. Mr. Shankar also thought the
windows on the north elevation should be adjusted to go from joint to joint of the precast
panels.
Chairperson Ledvina spoke about the gains that are made from having more "green space,"
especially in a shoreland district, as opposed to having the required number of parking
spaces. He said that reduced parking becomes Menard's problem. Mr. Ledvina thought this
was a reasonable way of approaching the parking reduction for this site. He also agreed with
Mr. Shankar regarding the building materials. Mr. Shankar confirmed that the precast
material would be used around the entire building. No cinder block would be used on the east
side.
Secretary Ekstrand asked to have it noted that the sign plan will be reviewed by staff. He said
it is not approved as part of this review. Mr. Ekstrand also stated that the signs were
excessive and did not meet code.
Boardmember Shankar moved the Community Design Review Board:
B. Approve aparking- reduction authorization for Menard's at 2280 Maplewood Drive to have
258 spaces fewer than the code requires. (The code requires 717 spaces on the site -29
Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes of 06 -22 -99
for the indoor warehouse and 688 for indoor retail space. Menard's is proposing 459
parking stalls.) Approval is because:
1. The required number of spaces is excessive. Menard's has gotten by, essentially,
with the main parking area in front of the building since 1988. Menard's customers do
not typically use other available parking areas on the site.
2. The proposed retail addition would need 169 spaces according to the code. The
existing easterly parking lot and the proposed 149 -space parking lot (totaling 180
spaces) would provide enough parking for the new retail space.
C. Approve the plans date - stamped May 5, 1999, and the parking -lot curbing addendum
date - stamped May 14, 1999, for the 33,769- square -foot addition to Menard's, 2280
Maplewood Drive. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall:
a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to the city engineer for
approval.
b. Revise the building elevations to show precast panels on the west, northwest and
east proposed elevations. The precast panels shall have a painted brick pattern
and color. The color shall be complimentary to the existing brick color and be
subject to staff approval. The west wall facade of the new addition will be two feet
further to the west than the existing wall facade. Applicant shall revise window
mullion spacing to align with precast panel joints.
c. Revise the site and landscape plans for staff approval as follows:
(1) Provide enough handicap - accessible parking spaces to comply with ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements.
(2) Increase the tree sizes to six - feet -tall for the spruce trees and 2 %2 inches in
caliper for the deciduous trees.
3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Close the existing curb cut north of the building with continuous concrete curbing,
remove the asphalt and landscape according to the approved plan. The
proposed access driveway and curb cut shall meet all requirements of the city
engineer.
b. Menard's shall provide a gate and clear access to the sanitary sewer manhole on
the site as part of this request.
c. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter all around the new parking lot west
of the outside - storage yard. The applicant shall also provide the curbed medians
as shown on the addendum and repave this entire area.
Community Design Review Board '
Minutes of 06 -22 -99
• f th units
• ent to match the building color i e
Paint new rooftop mechanical equipm
d '
are visible. (code req uirement)
' d unless the dumpsters would
m ster screening requirement is waive • ed using the
e. The trash du p � an enclosure shall be proved
be
visible to the public. In which case,
same ma terials and color as the building.
. be uired for the landscaped area
• lawn- system shall not b q -ground lawn
f An inground la g e applicant shall Install an in g
• southwest corner o pp .
in the so f the site. Th sca building.
irrig system for the land ed area north of the bu
p
g
code. The light source, including
the lens covering the bulb, shall be
• site-sec lighting as required by the co nu isance to
i
g. Provide site -sec Y ui
g concealed so not to cause any nu
drivers or neighbors.
• with 14ve
- foot -tall ver
f the ten - foot -tall screening fence w
h. Replace all o lace the screening fence on t he west side of
The applicant shall also rep d fencing.
fe ncing . with 14- foot -tall, vertical boar g
the outdoor storage yard
•
4. If any required work is not done, the city may a llow temporary occupancy if:
•
' d etermines that the work is not esse ntial to the public health, safety or
a. The city d
welfare.
• letter of credit for the req
• cash escrow or an irrevocable le required
An
b. The city receives a ca he cost of the unfinished work. y
am ount shall be 200 per is occ u p ied in
work. The am cent of t feted b June 1 if the building p
' ed landscaping shall Y ,
unfinished ll be comp building the fall or win ter or within six weeks if the b g is occupied in the spring or
summer.
approved plans. The director of community development may
5. All work shall follow th e pp
approve minor changes.
6. Signage shall be
submitted for staff approval.
Bo ardmember Johnson seconded. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
Agenda Item H2...
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Revision — Bulk Storage Wareho o b co
LOCATION: 1300 McKnight Road North ix
DATE: June 30, 1999 Ud ofte
Yod.1 ti
Xej eet�
INTRODUCTION
John C. Fallin, of FP &S, is asking the city to approve a revision for the conditional use permit
,(CUP) for his Bulk Storage warehouse, 1300 McKnight Road North. This revision would allow him
to add a 12' by 60' trailer near'the southeast corner of the existing warehouse. Mr. Fallin wants to
use this trailer for storage and for an employee break room. Refer to the attached maps, plans
and letter from the applicant on pages 8 through 12.
BACKGROUND
On November 28, 1998, the city council made several approvals for the expansion of Bulk
Storage including:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) for the existing Bulk Storage site. A CUP was necessary
because:
a. The proposed shipping -dock addition (both phases) would be closer than 350 feet to the
abutting residential districts. The proposed shipping -dock addition would be 120 feet
from the residential district to the north and 195 feet from the residential district to the
south. The code requires a CUP for buildings in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district that
would be closer than 350 feet to a residential zone.
b. Of the outdoor storage on the site. The city code requires a CUP for the outdoor storage
or display of goods or materials. Presently there are landscaping supplies stored west of
the main building and roofing supplies stored at the east end of the site. Maplewood had
never been granted a CUP for outdoor storage at this site.
2. A CUP for a new office building between Lakewood Drive and McKnight Road. The city
required the because the office building would be closer than 350 feet to the abutting
residential districts. The proposed Office building would be 310 feet from the residential
district to the north and 59 feet from the residential district to the south.
3. A parking waiver to have fewer parking spaces than the number required by code. For a
building the size of Bulk Storage, including the proposed addition, the code requires 109
paved parking spaces (83 for the large building, 12 for the Phase 1 shipping -dock addition
and 14 for the Phase 2 shipping -dock addition).
4 Plan approval for the proposed building addition and new office building.
DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit Revision
The proposed trailer meets the findings for CUP approval and would be compatible with the
existing warehouse and the development in the area. None of the proposed changes nor the
trailer should cause any problems for the city or for the neighbors.
Existing CUP for the Bulk Storage Site
Since the council approved the CUP in November 1998, the city formed a neighborhood advisory
group to work with the owner of Bulk Storage and FP &S to solve issues and concerns. Some of
the, areas of ..interest include screening, noise, site lighting, site and building maintenance and the
requirement for a driveway gate. (See the minutes 'from `their meeting on pages 13 and 14.) The
advisory group should reconvene to make sure all concerns have been properly addressed.
Gate
Condition 6 of the 1998 CUP approval states "Provide a locked gate system at the Lakewood
Drive entrance, subject to the approval of the Police Chief." Mr. Fallin has not yet installed a gate
at this site. I had Chief Winger and Lt. Banick of the Maplewood Police Department review this
requirement. (See the memo from Lt. Banick on page 16.) The neighbors near FP &S that I
spoke with told me that they still want Mr. Fallin to install a gate for the driveway.
Noise
Mr. Fallin said that his business hours at the warehouse are from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. so there would
not be any noise from his business in the late afternoon or evening. However, one of the
neighbors near the warehouse told me that there has been early morning (6:00 A.M.) truck traffic
at FP &S. If there are activities on the site in the morning or evening that disturbs the neighbors,
then the city should set hours of operation for the business as part of the conditional use permit.
Outdoor Storage
The code states that the city may require screening of outdoor storage yards. Condition 9 of the
CUP approval states that owner shall "provide planting or screening fencing along the north side
near the scale building and landscape materials." Staff has reviewed this requirement and have
determined that additional screening near the landscape materials and railroad tracks would not
help ny residential properties. The houses are too far away and there are areas of trees and
p r f
shrubs between the storage area and the existing homes that provide an excellent screen o t he
west end of the site.
Landscaping
The applicant has not proposed any additional landscaping for Bulk Storage. The proposed
pp p
addition would be screened from the homes to the north by a thick stand of mature oak trees.
This natural screening satisfies the screening requirement for this site. The neighborhood
advisory committee requested that instead of installing a buffer near the scale building, that the
city consider planting near the wetlands on city property on the north side of the railroad tracks.
Old
The applicant proposes to leave most of the natural vegetation on the office site, but would
landscape the frontage along McKnight Road. Mr. Fallin has not specified the types of plantings,
however.
Building Appearance and Trailer Placement
Although it is a different material from the existing plywood- exterior Bulk Storage building, the
proposed trailer would be compatible with the existing buildings in the area. The applicant
should repair the main building as needed, however.
COMMITTEE ACTION
June 21,.,1999: The planning commission recommended approval of. the CUP revision.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 18 -20. This resolution changes the conditional use permit for
the warehouse facility at 1300 McKnight Road North. This permit revision allows the owner
to add a trailer to his warehouse site in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district closer than 350
feet to a residential district. The city bases this approval on the findings required by code as
well as the following reasons:
1. The proposed trailer would be substantially screened from neighboring single dwellings.
2. The applicant's business hours are from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. so there would not be evening
noise generated from his business.
3. The proposed trailer is a minor addition to the existing 34 -acre site.
4. Lakewood Drive is an arterial roadway built to handle traffic volumes that would exceed
the current usage and any increase anticipated by the proposed addition and trailer.
This approval is subject to the conditions of approval adopted by the city council on
November 23, 1998, subject to the following revisions (I have crossed out the deletions and
underlined the additions):
1. 'All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city.
2. The proposed trailer must be occupied within
one year of council approval or the permit revision shall become null and void. The
council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit Lin one year.
4. A designated paved parking area shall not be required unless the site usage changes
warranting the need for parking spaces.
3
5. Update the alarm system at the facility, subject to the approval of the Director of Public
Safety.
6. Provide a locked gate system at the Lakewood Drive entrance, subject to the approval of
the Police Chief.
7. Provide several signs along the wetland edge on the warehouse site. The number and
placement of these signs shall be determined by staff. These signs shall prohibit any
building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping in or around the wetland.
8. Submit an industrial storm water protection plan to the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency for their review and approval.
9. The owner or developer shall remove the trailer from the site before the city issues a
building permit for any further development.
B. Approve the plans date- stamped May 12, 1999 for the trailer at the Bulk Storage site at 1300
McKnight Road North. The property owner shall:
1. Repair and repaint the existing graffiti on the warehouse building before occupying or
using the trailer.
2. Provide several signs along the wetland edge on the warehouse site. The number and
placement of these signs shall be determined by staff. These signs shall prohibit any
building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping in or around the wetland.
3. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
4
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
1 surveyed owners of the 21 properties within 350 feet of both sites. Of the 3 replies, two were in
favor and one objected.
In Favor
1. We have no problems with Mr. Fallin's request. (Mr. Pearson - Beaver Lake Manufactured
Home Park.)
2. The request seems reasonable with reasonable conditions. (Perry Shortridge)
Opposed
See the letter from Randy Batterson on page 17.
5
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Property size: 34 acres
Existing land use: Bulk Storage Warehouse facility as well as open storage for a landscaping
business storing retaining wall materials and cement pavers west of the
building and roofing supplies on the east end of the site.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
Bulk Storage Site
North: Railroad tracks and single dwellings
South: Single dwellings
West: Lakewood Drive and the applicants proposed office building site
East: Additional Bulk Storage property
Proposed Office Site
North: Railroad tracks and Lakewood Drive
South: Single dwellings (the abutting lot is a trucking yard)
West: Single dwellings in the City of St. Paul and railroad property
East: Lakewood Drive and Bulk Storage property
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: M -1
V
Zoning: M -1
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36- 187(b) states that no building or exterior use, except parking, may be erected, altered
or constructed within 350 feet of a residential district without a CUP.
Section 36- 151(b)(4) requires a CUP for the outdoor storage or display of goods or materials.
The city may require screening of such uses provided at least 80 percent of materials are
screened.
Section 36- 22(a)(8) requires one parking space for every 1000 square feet of warehouse space.
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council must base approval of a CUP on nine standards for
approval. Refer to the findings in the resolution on pages 18 -20.
F
Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the community design review board make the
following findings to approve plans:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring,
existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of
investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the
use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not
create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of
the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive
development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan.
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good
composition, materials, textures and colors.
p:sec24- 29\bulkstor.99
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan— Entire Property (dated 5- 12 -99)
4. Trailer Pictures
5. Applicant's Statement dated 5 -12 -99
6. 3 -13 -99 Neighborhood Meeting Minutes
7. 5 -20 -99 memo from Lt. Banick
8. 6 -4 -99 memo from Lt. Banick
9. Letter from Randy Batterson
10. CUP Revision Resolution —Bulk Storage Site
FA
Attachment 1
a
pRU W oats Cr
ANGEIA
Halrb �
U b 0 7
LN
G
AVE.
.
TI LSEN �E 1 ANTF.LOP£ MGIY Z
AVE. 3 et �
1 5 GUUR�t tN
HU1?tiORKE AM
E MARYLAND 4 5 AVE.
C3 � E�ROSE�� ?� ) G `vµ �
GERAW .0010
4� A
MAGNOLIA AVE. o=wn
ke
OIL Pl.
c�
CASE AVE. _
BWWO µml I.N. BRAND AVE
� AVE
& 7th ST.
7th ST.
BUSH
t� cw,err
� ��, � tea• �
AVE.
� MlNNEliithlA AVE
�1
J
2 REM= O
3 PfNLrTREE OR
4 aeChVtEW DR
5 PINE TRH DR
7 ROtLM HIDES DR
LOCATION MAP
8
4
N
KNOLL CIR.
4.
RE
KEY
AV
KINGSTON
o
�
- AYE
W
Uw aoir L
LARPENTEUR
L •
� I
IDAHO AVE.
V
A
j
HO YT �
FONT AVE. iKI tT�LI
W
W C�
"` 7E7E"
A1 �E.
.
U
NEBRASKA W I
pRU W oats Cr
ANGEIA
Halrb �
U b 0 7
LN
G
AVE.
.
TI LSEN �E 1 ANTF.LOP£ MGIY Z
AVE. 3 et �
1 5 GUUR�t tN
HU1?tiORKE AM
E MARYLAND 4 5 AVE.
C3 � E�ROSE�� ?� ) G `vµ �
GERAW .0010
4� A
MAGNOLIA AVE. o=wn
ke
OIL Pl.
c�
CASE AVE. _
BWWO µml I.N. BRAND AVE
� AVE
& 7th ST.
7th ST.
BUSH
t� cw,err
� ��, � tea• �
AVE.
� MlNNEliithlA AVE
�1
J
2 REM= O
3 PfNLrTREE OR
4 aeChVtEW DR
5 PINE TRH DR
7 ROtLM HIDES DR
LOCATION MAP
8
4
N
Attachment 2
V /
2
J
V
ii •
Y
V
n�f
PUD
S ol
7og 7-
M.
•
��.. �. ��- • NL
�4
TOTAL• /�T�•i•. _ ..-- • -_•_°A }!.... - -•
PUD
J t,
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
9
4
N
Attachment 3
I — PHASE I. SHIPPING DOCK ADDITION
II — PHASE 11. PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING BETWEEN
McKNIGHT ROAD AND LAKEWOOD DRIVE
111 — PHASE III. SECOND SHIPPING DOCK ADDITION
1 -
A �
&VAL
co nl
i
I f �
1•
'`�E4 1 • s � , t
4M.�
M f T L A M 0 1
ewes v ws •t'q • , s.3. r •es.t+
wM I .,1
•tMr� '
rrar.rd w tw. ),•rw. asKJ6d r ew. *# (w w
.i
i �1 %0 --- RfOWI�ti'IMO i
1, �nr.•+ ••c ••' � r
3
t
ego
It
fA
%
a �
r 3
� P
5:- /0 - CR
SITE PLAN
APPLICANT'S ENTIRE PROPERTY
10
t
e go
9CP
.••r
to
' .
11 1 •,
EXISTING
5-1
- Ml#
BULK STORAGE
c,� '-•
BUILDING
V
3
t
ego
It
fA
%
a �
r 3
� P
5:- /0 - CR
SITE PLAN
APPLICANT'S ENTIRE PROPERTY
10
t
iw �
V Qf
" I ,
NA L.
A 4 A ;-7
- 1F
J:t
4
Me
4
4
tq
A "
44
it
i
pe
P <
A . V .
4 -:k�'_'dT�� -^� v � zM1 < f �+ _ � ��,� . t'��?"`. < t }.. - ; 4 dt1: �' _ ,� .,r a .� --L•Z. _ - f '�' � � +I;r c. ; •.t
or
I coj.
-t
401W*
` fir `..�� - ss . �". `►� -�- .. ' -t .� � -+�. '.p H:) ,+jr.». �v[ i r .,v .> <
,� :.!� • � t , s'.� k1• 'r• arti *..' JF': .'K -G�-- �., r { � � 3 - i4-e a- i t
6,z C
k.
17 t •
� , j , 'r'� •.. t 4+f'���'`'°" ��� - ...R �r� . — - •t ' 't t :•i °'" t ~ ..t { j -
I• '•'��"ti .Mt�r. S- l'� 't � ' � .i�: 'yam {4+�jYlf�.�.t :�i� �y� _ �_ t 1 , 2 1 1 111 1111111111115
�.'{Fy .^•Lf•.. YJf�ya y -V' _ "'I ... ��Jt1,:�C . 'lv°-^f. �,: bt °[�' -t :'.-�:xi:�.'�.•,, {� ' "�!f�'•L'Y .ti:.ti'��j'F - ._ __ ._w .s��`�.a m �,�i _. .. .. _.it {\i'�'VF" � �•nstMr - ��n. ,+eels - rs� �wS� i
11 . L =Z
- WI T
Yk:
A-0
a vop UZI
1,16.6 e
.01P!ft,
- gldlh��� �� nle . •:- '(.a 4 � .� ���6. r 1 �': 7 t r • .� �r x +.
vk.,
Attachment 5
INTENDED USE
5" /z-99
We are requesting a CUP so we may place a trailer on our property. The
trailer will be used for a storage area and a break room for our warehouse
employees. The trailer is completely screened. The existing building hides
the West Side, the north is covered by the new addition, and the dense
woods screen the south and the East Side.
A trailer park (R -3) is the closest neighbor.
12
Attachment 6
Minutes from meeting held March 13, 1999 with FPS Services and neighborhood
representatives.
Those in attendance: Randy Batterson, 2321 Tilsen Avenue North (770- 9022); Linda Larson, 1295
Myrtle Street North (773 - 8316); Dave Bruechert,1380 Currie Street (773-
4876); Bill Paddock, 2281 Arlington Avenue East (773- 5531); John Fallin and
Tom ( ?) from FPS Services; Melinda Coleman, Colleen Dirkswager, and Butch
Gervais, City of Maplewood.
The group convened at 1:00 p.m. A tour of the facility was conducted and the following issues were
discussed:
1. Screening:
a) The group discussed the city council condition requiring screening or fencing along the
north side of the scale building and landscape material storage area. After looking at
the site, the neighborhood residents requested that instead of installing a buffer near
the scale building, that the city instead consider planting near the wetlands on city
property.
b) Ms. Larson requested plantings at the south end of the property to help reduce noise
and add screening.
Action:
a) Ms. Coleman will check with the park department and others to see if this can
be done.
b) Mr. Fallin will contact Ms. Larson to decide where and how many trees and /or
shrubs will be planted.
2. Noise:
a) Concerns were noted with snow plowing and operating front -end loader before 7:00
a.m. There was a concern with the front -end loader being used to pull train cars.
b) There was also a concern with truck drivers parking overnight on the site and idling
which is noisy.
Action:
a) Mr. Fallin agreed to look at business hours and would consider changing to
8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Has to talk to customers first. Mr. Fallin agreed to
repair cable puller for moving train cars. This should reduce some noise but
will not eliminate it altogether.
b) Mr. Fallin indicated he would ask truck drivers to park at the southeast corner
of the building. This is further away from the homes and well screened.
3. Lighting_
Neighbors discussed vandalism and suggested putting lighting in the southeast corner of the
building. They agreed that they didn't want the building lit up but suggested a motion sensitive
light. It was also suggested that some kind of covering be put on to protect light bulbs from
being broken.
13
-2-
Action:
Mr. Fallin agreed to install this type of lighting.
4. Maintenance Issues:
a) Group asked that, at a minimum, the graffiti on the building be painted immediately
and after any future incidences occur.
b) Group asked that the business do a better job of cleaning up equipment and the
ground of feed supplement. This is decaying and smelling.
Action:
a) Mr. Fallin doesn't have immediate plans to paint the entire building but agreed
to paint the existing and any new graffiti.
b) Mr. Fallin indicated that he would be installing a concrete pad where outside
loading occurs. This will make it easier to sweep up product. He has also
submitted a storm water protection plan to the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA) which addresses the above - mentioned issue and other
maintenance issues. City staff will follow up with MPCA to make sure plan has
been approved.
5. Miscellaneous Items:
a) Residents asked that staff monitor for any food product /additive that may attract
rodents.
b) Concern was raised about some old barrels that have been left on the south side of
the property.
C) Residents did not want a locked gate installed at the Lakewood Drive entrance (council
condition).
Action:
a) City staff will be monitoring the materials stored on premise as part of the CUP
review and annual fire department inspection.
b) Mr. Fallin will remove barrels.
C) Staff will work with the police department to determine if other alternatives are
acceptable.
6. Summary
Any changes proposed counter to the CUP conditions will go back to the city council. Staff will
notify residents when this occurs. We will meet again in approximately three months or
sooner should the residents request it.
14
Attachment 7
MEMO
To. Ken Roberts,
4 .t
From: John Banick, Police Lieutenant
Subject: Feed Products and Service Addition
Date: May 20, 1999
Upon reviewing this proposal I believe. the placement of a trailer at this location may invite an
increase in criminal activity in the area. As you know, this site is secluded which could create
additional police calls due to burglary, theft, or property damage.
I believe additional outdoor lighting and a security system should be included in this proposal.
Should you have questions please contact me at ext. 4502.
cc: Chief Winger
15
Attachment 8
MEMO
To: Ken Roberts _
From: John Banick Police Lieutenant -�
Subject: FEED PRODUCTS SECURITY GATE
Date: June 4, 1999
cc:
J UN a 4
X999
71,
I believe a security gate at this location has both advantages and disadvantages. A
gate may prohibit unwanted late night motorists however, it would also prevent
routine police patrol and possibly delay fire department access to the property. A
gate would not discourage bicyclists or pedestrians from entering the property which
inevitably would create additional police calls for service.
To me the disadvantages of installing a gate at this location outweigh the advantages.
Therefore, I do not believe a gate should be utilized at this location.
Chief Winger
16
JUN 11 1 9914:24
PAGE. 001
Attachment 9
Ken Roberts
O ffice of Community Developn=t
City of Maplewood
1830 L County load B
Xstpk4rood, MN .5109
612 Fox 651-770-4540
Ike: Conditional Use Permit (FP &S)
M"
In regards to coaditions for the CUP:
A gate would be beneficial to the residents for a few reasons;
June 11, 1999
RECE�VED
JUN 14 1999
am .0040WIN WW oft
a) It would dotour trucks from entering the facility outside budzi a hours and wao kenft There lm been
several instances where trudks park at the FP &S f acility early (tr the mor dW with their engines ru nniny-
Additionally, there is a truck axt%cWW plastic material% fmw a girt tar an Sunday mormjW with a Iotid
vacuum system for a 1 -!a hour period. Ihis is very anixWng to the reditats in the area.
b) Since FP&S is In sm Isolated area this is a prime area f or people to drop bawrdous Waste, o ld tires, etc. in
isolated arre$s of the development, (During our last tour of the feedity, the resi dents noticed ofd barrah an
tares in the creek on the NW side of the development)
c) If a gate were installed it would not b$ve to be locked only latched, this would alloy e mergency vehicles
to enter the premises, and would detour ot�t s. As we discussed, adding a to the gate indicating No
TrespaWl4r a sign indicating FP&S hour$ of operation would also bhp..
Landscaping:
This issue was brought up during previous discusslons with Mtlfttdik Colman. McWss was going to
research and advise the neighborhood tom mittee wiltb her Edith+ Ary o4diftnal t ►nr �� +� Mr,1FOUP,
would provide would be 4 plus.' The facility is old and 4 lapideted any�thn than can be done to screen the
facility is certainly appreciated.
t R&udVy4 / rson
=i '$'Uscn Ave N
Mspler+ood, MSSIf9
551770-9M CtMcc 612- 828 -2217
17
** TOTAL PAGE.001 **
Attachment 10
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. John C. Fallin, of FP &S Company, applied for a revision to an approved
conditional use permit to add a 12' by 60' trailer to a site in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district
that is closer than 350 feet to a residential district.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 1300 McKnight Road North. The legal
description is:
ALL THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA THAT LIES
SOUTHERLY OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 95 FEET
SOUTHEASTERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE
MAIN TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS, AND OMAHA RAILWAY
COMPANY, AS NOW LOCATED AND - ESTABLISHED; ALSO THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF
OF. THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24, BOUNDED AS FOLLOWS:
ON THE NORTH BY A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 95 FEET
SOUTHEASTERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE
MAIN TRACK OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY, AS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; ON
THE WEST BY THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 66 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 24; ON THE SOUTH BY A STRAIGHT LINE DRAWN FROM THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 24 TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 24 WHICH IS
DISTANT 450 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY
OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY, SAID SOUTHERLY LINE BEING A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL
WITH AND DISTANT 56 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM
THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY AS ORIGINALLY
LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; AND ON THE EAST BY THE EAST LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24;
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THAT LIES NORTHWESTERLY OF A LINE DRAWN
PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 8.5 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE MOST SOUTHERLY SIDE TRACK I.C.C. NO. 114
^F S/`JID RAILWAY COMPANY, AS NOW LOC/`,TED AND ESTAELISHED, ALL 1 ,"J THE
COUNTY OF RAMSEY, STATE OF MINNESOTA.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows:
1. On June 21, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this permit.
2. The city council held a public hearing on June 28,1999. City staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
18
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
10. The proposed trailer will be substantially screened from neighboring single
dwellings.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city.
2. The proposed trailer must be occupied within one year of council approval or the permit
revision shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. A designated paved parking area shall not be required unless the site usage changes in
some fashion warranting the need for such parking spaces.
5. Update the alarm system at the facility, subject to the approval of the Director of Public
Safety.
6. Provide a locked gate system at the Lakewood Drive entrance, subject to the approval of
the Police Chief.
7. Provide several signs along the wetland edge on the warehouse site. The number and
placement of these signs shall be determined by staff. These signs shall prohibit any
building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping in or around the wetland.
8. Submit an industrial storm water protection plan to the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency for their review and approval.
19
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JUNE 21, 1999
VI. NEW BUSINESS
C. Feed Products and Service Conditional Use Permit Revision (1300 McKnight Road)
Melinda Coleman, director of community development, summarized the staff report.
Ms. Coleman answered questions from the commissioners. John Fallin of FP &S, the owner of
the property, said this trailer would be put on the backside of the property and used for storage
and as an area for employees to get warm in the winter. Mr. Fallin was not sure if the trailer
would be permanent. He said it was a finished trailer and they did not plan any additional work
on it. Commissioner Thompson said he visited the site and it was "much improved."
Commissioner Trippler was indecisive about the gate situation. Mr. Fallin said they were in favor
of the gate because it would prevent unauthorized vehicle access and people from dumping on
the property. He felt trucks parking at the gate would be an issue for the neighbors.
Commissioner Trippler suggested an unlocked gate with a latch, and possibly a surveillance
camera, to inconvenience trespassers. Mr. Fallin said the gate was better for FP &S and "not so
good " for the neighbors. He pointed out that the gate would have to be back far enough so a
semitrailer could pull in and stop.
Commissioner Ledvina had a concern about leaving the location of the trailer "open- ended." He
felt this type of trailer should be temporary. Commissioner Rossbach thought Commissioner
Pearson (who was not in attendance at this meeting) would object to Mr. Ledvina's feelings that
this could not be a permanent structure. Mr. Ledvina said that an employment situation was
different than a residential one. Mr. Rossbach said he would be more comfortable in setting a
time limit instead of making it part of a particular construction phase. Mr. Ledvina suggested a
three or five year time limit. Commissioner Thompson proposed specifically including the trailer
in the CUP review in one year. Mr. Rossbach said he thought this would depend upon how the
city council handled the review. He "kind of agreed" with Mr. Ledvina in that it wouldn't be good
to set too much of a precedent to use a trailer to expand a business. Commissioner Thompson
pointed out that tax - increment financing was just passed by the commission for Schroeder Milk
who uses "a substantial number of trailers" for warehousing. Ms. Coleman said Schroeder Milk
was also under a conditional use permit and she surmised that the trailers were permitted as
part of their business.
Commissioner Ledvina was hesitant about making a decision in regard to the gate.
Commissioner Seeber suggested that there might be a way to prevent unauthorized dumping
without putting in a gate. Commissioner Trippler said the trailer "didn't bother him one way or
another," but he was uncertain about the gate. He did not think it needed to be addressed in the
recommendation to the city council. Mr. Trippler asked if the condition should be changed to
require removal of the trailer before a building permit is issued for Phase II instead of Phase III.
Ms. Coleman said Maplewood has adopted an addendum to the building code which requires
additions to buildings to be sprinklered or an equivalent. She did not think that, under these new
codes, Phase III will be allowed to be constructed without sprinklering. Economically it will be
almost infeasible to sprinkler this proposed building because of its size.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which changes the conditional use permit for the warehouse
facility at 1300 McKnight Road North. This permit revision allows the owner to add a trailer to
his warehouse site in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district closer than 350 feet to a residential
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 06 -21 -99
district. The city bases this approval on the findings required by code as well as the following
reasons:
1. The proposed trailer would be substantially screened from neighboring single dwellings.
2. The applicant's business hours are from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. so there would not be evening
noise generated from this business.
3. The proposed trailer is a minor addition to the existing 34 -acre site.
4. Lakewood Drive is an arterial roadway built to handle traffic volumes that would exceed the
current usage and any increase anticipated by the proposed addition and trailer.
This approval is subject to the conditions of approval adopted by the city council on November
23, 1998, subject to the following revisions ( I have crossed out the deletions and underlined the
additions):
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city.
2. The proposed trailer must be occuaied within one
year of council approval or the permit revision shall become null and void. The council may
extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. A designated paved parking area shall not be required unless the site usage changes
warranting the need for parking spaces.
5. Update the alarm system at the facility, subject to the approval of the Director of Public
Safety.
7. Provide several signs along the wetland edge on the warehouse site. The number and
placement of these signs shall be determined by staff. These signs shall prohibit any
building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping in or around the wetland.
8. Submit an industrial storm water protection plan to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
for their review and approval.
B. Approval of the plans date - stamped May 12, 1999, for the trailer at the Bulk Storage site at 1300
McKnight Road North. The property owner shall:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for the trailer.
2. Repair and repaint the existing warehouse building before occupying or using the trailer.
3. If any required work is not done on the trailer when the applicant requests a certificate of
occupancy, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 06 -21 -99
amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished
landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter,
or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
4. Provide several signs along the wetland edge on the warehouse site. The number and
placement of these signs shall be determined by staff. These signs shall prohibit any
building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping in or around the wetland.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Commissioner Seeber seconded.
Commissioner Rossbach said it was his intent that a second motion should be made to address
Condition A. 6. He felt this would let the city council know the planning commission's thoughts
on the gate. Commissioner Thompson asked about the condition that requires repair or
repainting of the existing warehouse building before occupying or using the trailer. Melinda
Coleman explained that Mr. Fallin indicated he was not painting the entire building immediately.
She thought "repair and repaint" referred to a graffiti issue that has been resolved.
Chairperson Fischer made a friendly amendment to have B.2. read "Repair and repaint the
graffiti on the existing warehousing ... " Commissioners Rossbach and Seeber accepted the
amendment. Commissioner Ledvina noted a difference in the resolution that would address
some of his concern in regard to removal of the trailer.
Ayes all
The motion passed.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend that a provision for a
locked -gate system at the Lakewood Drive entrance be included in the resolution.
Commissioner Ledvina seconded. Ayes Fischer, Ledvina, Rossbach, Thompson
Nays Trippler, Seeber
The motion passed.
Agenda Item ('13
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager Aotfon by Ca •
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner�� •
SUBJECT: Knollwood Circle - Preliminary Plat IndozV
LOCATION: South of County Road D and West of Cypress Street Vodi
DATE: June 30, 1999 Re gcte
INTRODUCTION
Pat Goff, of Goff Homes, is requesting approval to develop Knollwood Circle, a 12 -.lot subdivision
on a 6.53 acre site south of County Road C and west of Cypress Street. Refer to the maps on
pages 7 -9.
The city council approved this plat in 1988, renewed it several times and terminated it in 1997.
This current proposal is conceptually the same as the previous plat, but with 12 lots instead
of 14. Refer to the previously - approved plat on page 10.
BACKGROUND
December 15, 1988: The city council conditionally approved the preliminary plat. The council
also rezoned the site from F (farm residential) to R -1 (single dwelling residential).
Since 1988, the council approved eight one -year time extensions.
March 24, 1997: The city council ended this preliminary plat approval because:
1. Government regulations and policies have changed significantly since the city first approved
this preliminary plat.
2. More than eight years have passed since the city held a public hearing on this plat. There may
be new neighbors near the plat site. They should have a chance to comment on the plans to
develop this property.
3. There has been no physical activity to develop this plat.
4. Mr. Goff did not request a time extension for the project.
DISCUSSION
Density and Lot Size
The project is under the allowed density for a parcel this size. The land use plan would allow 26
units (4.1 units per acre), based on the city's density formulas. The applicant is proposing 12
units (1.84 units per acre). The proposed lot sizes also meet code. Each lot is over 15,000
square feet as required by the shoreland ordinance. (Most of the site lies within the Kohlman
Lake shoreland boundary.)
Tree Removal /Replacement
Maplewood's tree ordinance requires there be at least ten trees per gross acre on the site after
grading. For this 6.53 acre site, the ordinance requires that at least 66 large trees remain.
The plans show the removal of 30 quality, large trees (ash, maple and evergreens), but he would
preserve approximately 100 trees and plant 32 more. Refer to the tree plan. (As a point of
clarification, there would be more than 30 trees removed. Other than the 30 "quality" trees, the
applicant would remove many willow, box elder and cottonwoods.)
Wetland Ordinance
The Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District has classified the wetland on proposed Outlot
A as a Class Four Wetland. This classification requires an average buffer width of 25 feet with a
minimum of 20 feet. The proposed grading plan would meet the wetland buffer requirements.
Drainage Concerns
Several neighbors expressed concern over the potential for increased runoff and flooding due to
this development. The city should require that the applicant's grading /drainage plan ensures that
the runoff from his project will not increase the stormwater flow onto any neighbor's land.
COMMITTEE ACTION
June 21,1999: The planning commissiion recommended approval of this preliminary plat.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Knollwood Circle preliminary plat (date- stamped May 7, 1999). The developer shall
complete the following before the city council approves the final plat:
'i . Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet
all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Have NSP install street lights preferably at the street .intersection. The exact location and
type of lights shall be subject to the city engineer's approval.
d. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs
shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation
cutting, filling, grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign
design and location before the contractor installs them. The developer or contractor shall
install these signs before the city issues building permits in this plat.
e. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
f. Provide all required and necessary easements (ten -foot drainage and utility easements
2
along the front and rear lot lines of each lot and five -foot drainage and utility easements
along the side lot lines of each lot).
g. Pay the city for the cost of traffic- control, street identification and no- parking signs.
h. Investigate the applicability of incorporating rain water gardens throughout the plat.
2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall
include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree and street plans. The plans shall
meet the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code.
b. The grading plan shall:
(1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home
site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat.
(2) Include contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
(3) Show housing pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save
large trees.
(4) Show the proposed street grades as allowed by the city engineer.
(5) Show all proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 on the proposed construction plans.
The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management
practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1.
(6) Include the tree plan which:
• Shows where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan
shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
• Shows no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
3. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading.
4. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community
development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or
approves the final plat.
't]
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
I surveyed the owners of the 63 properties within 350 feet of this site. Of the 18 replies, 1 was in
favor, two had no comment and 15 either objected or expressed concern.
Comments
1. I think that it looks like a good plan for that little area. The lots are a little small for my taste
and I would rather see fewer and larger lots. Thank you for your interest in my opinion.
(Baldwin, 929 Connor Avenue)
2. We are both retired and living on a fixed income. We have to rob Paul to pay Peter as it is.
imagine a new housing development in back of us just means higher taxes which we don't
need. We will sure miss our wild life back there, deer, pheasants, coon, etc. (Johnson,
2611 Cypress Street)
3. Concerning the Goff Homes I must tell you that we have lived at 1023 County Road C for
25 years. Sir, you must know about the traffic that all the new homes have brought to
County Road C. They had to put a stop sign in the middle of the street. I am please asking
you to reconsider this problem. The traffic is .so heavy. (Coury, 1023 County Road C)
4. 1 worry about the more traffic on County Road C and also where will the runoff from the new
various lawns and driveways will run off and into. Is it Kohlman Lake? (McClellan, 961
County Road C)
5. I strongly oppose this development. (Morrison, 2630 Forest Street)
6. Neutral no opinion. (Carle, 2543 Cypress Street)
7. Water runoff? Value of homes? Will it effect taxes on my house IE. roads, sewer,
improvements to playground as use increases? (Reeve, 981 Connor Avenue)
8. My only concern would be the traffic increase and control in the area. Thank you.
(Callahan, 975 County Road C)
9. 1 am concerned about an increase in drainage due to this project. (Shaw, Forest Street)
10. 1 am concerned about the value of the homes that are to be built. There should be a
written stipulation as to the minimum value of the homes to be built. It appears that some
of the lots are extremely small in the cul -de -sac. I am concerned about depreciating my
property value of my home. (Orth, 2540 Forest Street)
11. Our main concern is that we are down hill from the site. We'd like to be ensured that
houses are built so that we don't get runoff in our yard. Most of our neighbors have water
in their basements. We never have (yet).
I hope they are able to save some of the big pines and trees back there. It is sad to see
the meadow developed. We have lots of wildlife and even a wild blackberry patch but at
least it is not going to be built with twin homes or multi - dwellings. I guess that is the most
we can ask for. When do they plan on doing this? Thank you. (Hardenbrook, 2560 Forest
Street)
4
12. Since they are building in a gravel pit, they aren't destroying anything. As long as the huge
evergreens are left, I have no problem with the plans -- although less houses on larger lots
would be great. (Oberg, 2613 Forest Street)
13. We oppose this development; we believe it would:
a. Aggravate the problem of storm runoff which is already a significant concern due to our
hillside location.
b. Reduce our privacy (more so than for others) due to the proximity of proposed house "4"
which is on the cul -de -sac.
c. Reduce the aesthetic value of the existing properties by removing trees and displacing a
- Wonderful population of birds and small animals.
d. Exposing us to another 3 to 5 years of construction noise, dust and dirt. (Smith, 2570
Forest Street)
14. No problem! (Orsello, 970 Connor Avenue)
15. Our main concern is to prevent the loss of too many trees. In our case we are mostly
worried about trees in Knollwood Circle Lots 2 to 5, especially those toward the back of the
lots. Obviously, cutting down of trees will be necessary, just prevent losing trees as much
as possible. I suggest a reasonable goal of preserving 25 to 50 percent of the larger trees.
(Floyd, 955 Connor Avenue)
16. We prefer that the area remain undeveloped, but recognize the property owner's right to
develop it (consistent with regulations, codes and ordinances). Our main concerns are
1.) That trees and other vegetation remain undisturbed as much as possible, and 2.) That
the homes built are consistent in design and value with others in our neighborhood. Any
variation from the above will meet with our firm opposition. (Nichols, 2550 Forest Street)
17. 1 would be concerned about the impact of traffic and activity by the park. This also seems
like a lot of homes in a small area. As progress marches on, I hope you will do a complete
study of the environment, traffic and impact on the park. Also, what would be the cost for
Maplewood to buy this and have it an open area for wild life? (Holmgren,
934 County Road C.)
18. Refer to the letter on page 11 from Rich Littlefield, 970 County Road C.
5
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: gross acreage — 6.53 acres; net acreage — 5.96 acres (minus the street)
Existing land use: undeveloped
SURROUNDING LAND USES
The site is surrounded by single dwellings.
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: R -1 (single dwellings)
Zoning: R -1
p:sec9lknolwood.99
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan (Proposed Preliminary Plat)
4. 1988 Preliminary Plat (Previously Approved Plat)
5. Letter from Rich Littlefield dated May 26, 1999
6. Project Plans (separate attachment)
C�
Attachment 1
J
'tp
BEAM AVE. �
60 � J 'UA
k � cr
4.
2.
'� 3. � a
° 19
a KoN".%on
\�J
•
1 PUIZaI WK :;: .. ::; : ; . f
2 ALVARADO OR PALM
3 6EUECRES'T DR •= ::::::::::::•
4 DEALMLLE OR C µ.L.o • ?': ':' ':':
CONNO Cdr
3 CT.
D
22 �-
0 rIBR
CT.
1
E�
�Fl
'ro 'ok PK*Ya
e
g
aHT A YE
If
rA
,�.AVF. u 4� 11
t. SUMMIT CT.
2. COUNTRWEW CIR.
3. DU LUTH CT.
4. LYDIA ST.
BEAM
o
t;
'LARK g CT '
SHEh2HEN AVE. F
COPE
v
O
� CO, a
W
CiQNi
Lake �.
RD.
y
R0.
SAND
4.
2.
'� 3. � a
° 19
a KoN".%on
\�J
•
1 PUIZaI WK :;: .. ::; : ; . f
2 ALVARADO OR PALM
3 6EUECRES'T DR •= ::::::::::::•
4 DEALMLLE OR C µ.L.o • ?': ':' ':':
CONNO Cdr
3 CT.
D
22 �-
0 rIBR
CT.
1
E�
�Fl
'ro 'ok PK*Ya
e
g
aHT A YE
If
rA
,�.AVF. u 4� 11
t. SUMMIT CT.
2. COUNTRWEW CIR.
3. DU LUTH CT.
4. LYDIA ST.
BEAM
o
t;
'LARK g CT '
SHEh2HEN AVE. F
COPE
J
O
� CO, a
RD. N
v � LAURIE
RD.
o L£LA'N0
R0.
SAND
URST
r
8
KOHLMAN
AVE.
� — B
�n
rrr*w �*
�
e�RKE
�
AVE. o
J a
ROAD
V; ELDR IDLE
C
I � TO
t;
d
��SE
z
AVE.
BEIMONT AVE.
�
SKIN a'�
� 11V
CT.
vv-EIR
SHO
NCR
J
GE*RVAlS AVE.
" ---A BROOKS
L SEX NS
CRANDV1Ew
VIKING 1
� VIKING DR. Keller b0
w La ice
w
g LAURIE CT.
W @ �r
Y BURKE CT.
BURKE 1 AV
Pork
ELDRIDGE AV
hrline g LMONT
. Ake E LN,
SKIU.MAN /1V.
KENW 000
• f
LOCATION MAP
7
4
N
t;
'LARK g CT '
SHEh2HEN AVE. F
COPE
� AVE.
�
O
� CO, a
RD. N
v � LAURIE
RD.
o L£LA'N0
R0.
SAND
URST
r
8
JUNCTION
AVE.
� — B
�n
rrr*w �*
�
e�RKE
AVE. � BURKE
AVE. o
J a
V; ELDR IDLE
AVE.
���
�
LN
d
��SE
rn
AVE.
BEIMONT AVE.
�
SKIN a'�
� 11V
E. SKILL MAN AVE.
vv-EIR
SHO
J
LOCATION MAP
7
4
N
Attachment 2
.... ZSe `_�• ' cal :� Z •-+• rn — 33:
^1
&�
R a
• 169. 47.5 loo 4 _
8 0 / � J� . 75 4 0 ! z 3.73 $ 3 ' - -- - X1010.- -- - -
- -_
. 3 8 ee.e.. L3 9 517N ono > 0"
68) ( 5 1 T 0
J C � X
� t �' 1,� 1 f .. : .• Y ' rf .:.'•.. ' t om' �� '� 0 �v
3 _ r
.r s G
3
••r '• • ` O
Go
�. • r
N r 1 % <
` ' ?: . r }� � x � . '• Y • �, } � r :•�'4 • '.%.: OI f t )
A ((�+�• 1n
Ql ♦ d :} , .. r r 7 r �•rr rr r,. .,.''•}:ss{'Y4ii'• 0 Z
( Cam, • �' x�, f � i
M • ;r k v;r 7 • � �
U) KNOLLWOOD- % <�. _ ,� 5 :.�.....:.r�:. l i e
95.4 : C I RC LE rri::k¢} fr { } } } f f
• 0 A I �) +• • ��f ev{r yb. f•: }�'"x -'s j v:
�1 � � V S r •. •r, f 5i ...;.? S .,r} Y . � 'kr.••:• } f l {' t
' � ^ i:: fisrJ;f Emu •'rr . � ,�•.,s {;C;;ri''' :v}? r.}..i.:.v{f'r
•;+ f•S' . Y O
w (� • •.{ ter'+: x ..,.; •. ; s.•r'• rr. } {''' }Y•:f .} ? {:v ? ••i:: ❖:;}.,.•::. }•'•';''4.::;. �;.•.•r' ,
• �1l '•.{}^r • f } wr. }:{'•: {} {; • fiS •rrf:{ { ••.
' , f:• { . { {: }ry ( '
''•�Gs �:: • ;L • {.; r • f s. }.,•�.{ s •'•. s .;{. { }:r,.. /YrrY•i•''.
} {{ };: {.. ; r.•.} { { }.• }..•f •: Y.:�,.•,.,•;:::... rfsr. I 3 6 a c
' (/� 1 : } Y.r.• • •s s '; fi{ v •' :ti yv {':: }i.:{{.{{•xsrr . •.•..• f r; f{ b "�.x'r'{ff'' ./
/ yr r,.,. v •S:•: • s ......,: • • r +.srl•
•r.S,ffisir . fi . Y .;..{ ::•,f.•. }Y,{.Y;�' i r:{ }:•:;: {:;f. }: }, :' } ::: ?y {::• ::r:'r: } {:•:
• :•'dr:ti� ''{� .,. �' •.rrr . r, s .s' r r
1 I .•:�:•... Sr••'s ' r. ri }.;•r• { s? •;;} v • ..s, •.'.•'• y '...?+.''•••srr...',.•. rs. v ? {,r {
CI Y.•' " •. S S , } r.} }'• •rf • Vf .,.,: •S•R,VV f.SSSV.Jf S }.•.•.: •..•:
• • (Z :: �= o- } } rr:•:� :; { %fi •':: } r }C•;r Y.•'•. ::v:.rrr: -�
� z ��••,� • . ? ti .�'� ❖ j'i, {, • r r,.jf;�' {'.•'r':v ti;:• }:•:�:: ,.;� ;.;.}';:; }: ?r,•.?r.�};:; }} {r{� ::,{..'"•{.'; h?;: � ; }:= 'r: %: %�: ?. }: %'r: }f�:�'r {:v.
�} . . )� • ' �+U � � { :f•,e fs�ti;:rr{r•:s }rrf : ?{ �•:::: ;;:sue• •,}. { {{'. rti,.vr} V.eY'•{ fi •.v •. f rr },{C;,v,•r}'rr.•.ssvr }rrr... 1
v' 1•:b ?s;. f vr . '. �Y.•r.; S:• x••r } v r;.Y:s s r�., • ., rY •. r::;r.•.•.•.}v{ • }:;. � V
r � fi•:.
• 7 . '� �. { � {'�:. =:�'r s v •,v; }ti;'ii;}'i:S { } {;'r,:•` ? ?v::e ?:: r :;: ': { }, {• }: •:• }ti:::}
....
r,•:ir.Y•• r:s r• • v... rs ;.�.:•:•}:•. �' ::'••}::tiv......
....... . ..;
: ; r . r. ;.} {'rr r v,. • .rl'{ ..... <'•'::.•:• :•.•.;: •,•.• ;•••:•,
:J:,:•f ''.'.':S. ti ff f•::. {', •� .fY .::: Y :d ti:•�•.., Y:•,} .;•;�;. ;•:y;:;.; {.Y�;.: 9 )
1 5 rtifi{. f r rvr {. xr,. ti o= :r : ;:i } i < {.•:•;:ti{ :•: }ti } }:ti ?} .. rorr. {. f .,.•..
✓ • {:{; }:S }: � :••{:,.'} f;'{.. }• �+: }� •r :•}'•:•: ll�; • ., }. � { { f : {ABLY• :{ {•:• '•.••: •.,r f;: ••: • }'•••'•:
'• ^' r •' {'%s { } {:. rv� { : rv:. ;;:;• • i 'r{ r .•}:• s:•:: s;` •.. . f {{ ^ O •
A A C :•y':'•':},r,.•'•'r.•Yw:V•: h�i }'r: {v}'•Y ?ti::; {•'� };:$ r {•.•r: { } . + •s: ❖ { ::::: };:;:;:;: }:�r:�:�:fi: }::;: {}r.;: } };v,:;: }$ti:: �: �:�i 4 T 6 0.
' �! � C 4o) I r; ( L., •'•r : {rr •:{•.• r ,., "%'' •,..; A A •.•.•.•..•.,....: • . • AY. • . • . • . • r:::v:•: }: {•:• �:•:•:•:•:� �
;; { r r� }s {• �;; C�{ �}' �' v �;{. r };:fv;:;:.'.' .} ;::;:y}:: }} ti.} };.ti{:} { } • }'.'Y }•{..•.• j. v,: •.}r };rrr A';.;A::;•• ::
{ 'r S }si } : {v: {L•• :y. { : }fv:v:•::;:tii' }ir:'•:{ f {': } r:;:;:; i;:;: }y;:;'r,
m 8 • A ., r }.,.... Y.• Asv'•.: }• : ; ti }? •:::�? ....•A,. ::..... r'r f.: {•: {$::: {:::: {:{: A
:} x . v:{,'r,';:4? } •r} • fi } ? r {;� •; �f{ :; v} Y:• } •:,{f•:•:•;r. r.:' :: { {.,r. ❖.. A
•� � :? ,?,'i:•�:;.;�:v: v, ;:tiv:; {� }�: } } +,': k•. S��•1.,.. ; };ri r:;:• J L1 } ?r ; } :• }:S:Y :Y {. };• }:•:• :•'} }l.
••, v} :. �•.:,.,r.,.. fi .;r} fi:''.. A ti s { r r ..... r...........,. �� C
� ` '.•:Y{:''r' :• {;: {:�:;: }Y } : {�: { {:• }:Sti•. {: yi i• A4:• }:ifi;:k�'r:•}:{Yti }i:�::ri::f:::•: }•r'r:�:�: ;: ;• ;: � ? {:;'r' {.•:;: {�:�:•::
8 � � � : ;$� ' r}.,.,r:s s r,. f{ {}f ti� �$;i: °{:: :::;: rti 1;' ' ;: }ti;::� :: }i'•$' $ {::}:{:: �:•: •iti� }:ti:� ?�r: }:�:ti�i.'•' °;:;X!{ ;:;:;:; ? {;:•
. rr }ti'ri •i: {�:; }: };'fir: {S . }..,,.,.,... . � }:fi• •r r. { •: •}; :• •r •r • .� • ° fi •••:{•:•}: {•:•} } {:•} O I � /�
/, ��' .:;.;; }S.SV { ; ❖: ;.4.•:,,�;: ?r,:; :::: : }'' r::$ ?•;' :; r{;:}: �:•: �:::: d:$:%{ fi: �:•: �i :v } }:v'r:•:•: } ��$ }$: % %� }:•:r'r
� � V 1 •ofRti;:�•:}';'�.' {'}�'.• f { Y; } }::::5: {:: ;:v } :, v . . { •:•:;::: :::�s;,•.•.s rx::::s•.:;{ r �:;:•: {;.� }: G
G :? ,. } ,.;,;.• {.•:.::�••r rti ;-4 . ... �'sy •: {: { v r,.,..... r .......•. }.•.•.•
/� ti: }}S }';; {I ��ti }S; :• ;rl Sfrfxl } }:� •:• • !r } :{r: ' }1 •. • }tiYf .b :•� :{ {?.;.;.Y { • :•� �:;�:Y:: • Q 0
.• �{ ::�;:;:;:;%; } f: f�:; {.•~•� 7 - {f �fl:• }: f �'�:ti: �} f v: %S= :rr {V: s i }
+ , ....:v{.,Y s ?r fiv;}fi' { } 5�:� ti { }$?•:::::�:�:? �:'r,::: {f�:: { ?::? f{: tiff ::::;:;;{::'?;' } f�: {'i,}:;::�i:
r ' { :'ri' {••r ��;'•:�' ••: }:•} : :'v: }: :'•} f y. };. •• {r • • `+
% 3 4 '� nr ' rti •:{ { {: } }:::•:r:.Y:•: •... •::::.. ...
77- �� 37 5( 3 23.1 3¢. Z i 9 3
�` 9 n (fig) �• �, , a .5 132
� , �
4� °� � � a � � 16 0-3 � � 3c ON N ( 62)
3 l
� o - t• �' � 132.
(3?)
(9*)
10 1 2 13
4 1
NI
115. s4 0 � � 6 2 13 2 .s7 S '
A, 6 3 so a s C63 �
1019: E34 .4.5 7`i'' 8 � C ) � 4 � s ;��, 13 2.V
(44) • ��� r• (39) �'. 5 6 �.� 5 a3 k o ' 3
In
�4 1 8 7 �n 103 ?5,1r9 C43) c 13 2.67
K
9• 7
1 3 s 14 - -- too. �.
0 0 7S. �. •ti n�D
5 L. L_ E
fit io3 L !o0 78 77 0 85.58 � G
1 °, •, AV E
EMONT S
'vJ -73 • l/ 4- ; 0 2 i C4 6 V� t�1L._ .I41/r U- 4
too 109 �. n /OQ 8 Z.7S 7Z .2.5 6, 9.3l� /, c^1 _ - -
J.
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
E
4
N
Attachment 3
A6
A6
AL
WMANDS
A6 AL
I— rw
I I
9W,-PV44-fr-TV1GK 4-1046
_ � � � f • ' � � I K, t�btt• �, N
o� A6
S 170'
in
V7
Its
&JA 0 0
\00,
I MMOr W 41=
sz-1 SIN&L&
lbo
T
a
SITE PLAN
4
N89*3'9'2rE
S 89639'2
8
0
W
14
pp)
< O /
,�
�
� / /
/
x
_
f5,1o3
S �
N 89.39'Or E 167.55
A6
A6
AL
WMANDS
A6 AL
I— rw
I I
9W,-PV44-fr-TV1GK 4-1046
_ � � � f • ' � � I K, t�btt• �, N
o� A6
S 170'
in
V7
Its
&JA 0 0
\00,
I MMOr W 41=
sz-1 SIN&L&
lbo
T
a
SITE PLAN
4
Attachment 4
1 1
• ,7
Ale bvww
- oz.
16 low w.
AL IRK
Q i if !7� • / / ! � / ,�
� t
R
• /f� r
/so �Opl
op
Ii.iiO it � / R/�II j,1�1/ � �.i1Q �•
i
` f
• � � '� a1/N�Mr► �!7 � •''• ._ _ _ �� � � � ~ fir yr � � � � b
� ►.J.
t rso
0
iAP �n
`- - — — •Mir. A� — — - -
1988 PRELIMINARY PLAT
10
li
N
Attachment 5
May 26, 1999
Mr. Tom Ekstrand,, Associate Planner
Office of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
D Ekstrand,,
Please accept my gratitude for the opportunity to express my concerns regarding the
proposed Knollwood Circle subdivision. 1 appreciate the locator snaps you
enclosed with your letter announcing the approval request.
My primary response is that I am pleased to see Mr. Goff has excluding the wetland
from development. This has always been a bode of contention with those of us who
live adjacent to it. My secondary response, therefore, is that I would be pleased to
welcome Mr. Goff s customer's to our neighborhood.
However,, I do have two ftirther concerns which require satisfaction. First, what
effect will the constriction have on my eastern property line where it abuts the
construction zone? From a topographic standpoint, the property line there lies along
a hill and I would be reluctant to see my property slough -off any cliff that was made.
Second, what is the proposed fate of the beautiful,, huge pine and other types of trees
growing on the hill on the south side of the wetland? Rumor has it that the hill
where they grow is to be pushed into the quarry pit as fill. Additionally, the Loss of
the hill would reduce drainage flow into the wetland, possibly rendering it a dryland.
Thank you for your consideration of these issues.
Sincerely,
ic 'tt efield
970 ounty Road C East
Maplewood, MN 55109
11
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JUNE 21, 1999
VI. NEW BUSINESS
D. Knollwood Circle Preliminary Plat (Cypress Street, South of County Road C)
Melinda Coleman, director of community development, presented the staff report. Ken Haider,
city engineer, answered a question from Commissioner Rossbach about no requirement for a
storm sewer system. He said there is a requirement for a drainage plan but the land south of
Kohlman Lake is only slightly above the water level in the lake so there is not much grade to
work with. Surface drainage systems and ponds have been installed, mostly on the park
property, that will temporarily store water until it can be discharged into the lake. Mr. Haider said
that most of the water from this subdivision will come to the intersection of Cypress and County
Road C and then into the city system to be discharged to Kohlman Lake.
Ms. Coleman confirmed that most of the trees being removed are on the west side of the site.
The applicant was not present at the meeting. Mark Nichols, 2550 Forest Street, was
concerned about several issues. Mr. Nichols did not receive notice of this commission meeting.
Ms. Coleman said the public hearing would be at the city council meeting on July 12. Mr.
Nichols and surrounding residents will be notified of that meeting. Mr. Nichols' said his lot and
others in his neighborhood have been impacted by storm water flow in the past. He asked the
commission to consider the tree removal plan closely as he envisioned Lot 7 being stripped of
trees. Mr. Nichols had a concern about the placement of the street lights. He refuted a property
owner claim that this development was being built in a gravel pit. Mr. Nichols said this is a
"beautiful, green area."
Mr. Nichols inquired about the value of the homes to be built. Ms. Coleman said she did not
have that information and could not legally ask. She suggested Mr. Nichols ask the applicant at
the public hearing. Ms. Coleman explained the plat process and how it related to Mr. Nichols'
concerns. Ken Haider said he did not totally agree with the staff report in regard to street lights.
He did not see an area where he would want to put two street lights in this subdivision. He
thought one would be required at the intersection with Cypress. Mr. Haider explained that street
lights are rented from NSP on a monthly basis and, because there is a cost involved, the city
tries to limit the number of lights. These lights are intended for traffic security lighting is the
responsibility of the property owner.
Commissioner Thompson asked if a preliminary plat should not include verbiage that required
adequate public services, similar to that in a conditional use permit. Ms. Coleman said this
application falls under the zoning ordinance and if the property owner meets all the code
requirements he can develop his property. Mr. Thompson expressed concern over the drainage
issue. Mr. Haider said that because this was zoned by the city for single - family homes, the city
has a responsibility, to a degree, to provide public improvements. He said the drainage system
in the area works reasonably well but it is not perfect.
Commissioner Rossbach thought the runoff from the west side would go to the new street and,
on the east side, it would go to the north except for Lot 9. He suggested that some grading be
done on Lots 6, 7, and 8 that would allow for water to be retained on these lots for approximately
a 48 -hour period. Mr. Haider was concerned about a hill in this area. He suggested that a
condition could be worded "the applicability of a rainwater garden on Lots 6, 7, and 8 could be
investigated and incorporated if local soil conditions would allow it."
Chairperson Fischer noted that the planning commission usually tables a proposal if the
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 06 -21 -99
applicant is not present. She asked if staff recommended that the commission act on this
because of the time frame. Ms. Coleman said, in this case, she would recommend action.
Commissioner Ledvina moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Knollwood
Circle preliminary plat (date- stamped May 7, 1999). The developer shall complete the following
before the city council approves the final plat:
1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and
meet all city requirements.
b. * Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Have NSP install street lights in one location subject to city engineer's approval.
d. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs
shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing,
vegetation cutting, filling, grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve
the sign design and location before the contractor installs them. The developer or
contractor shall install these signs before the city issues building permits in this plat.
e. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
f. Provide all required and necessary easements (ten -foot drainage and utility easements
along the front and rear lot lines of each lot and five -foot drainage and utility easements
along the side lot lines of each lot).
g. Pay the city for the cost of traffic- control, street identification and no- parking signs.
h. Investigate the applicability of incorporating rain water gardens throughout the plat.
2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall
include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree and street plans. The plans shall meet
the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code.
b. The grading plan shall:
(1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site.
The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat.
(2) Include contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
(3) Show housing pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save
large trees.
(4) Show the proposed street grades as allowed by the city engineer.
(5) Show all proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 on the proposed construction plans. The
city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for
any slopes steeper than 3:1.
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 06 -21 -99
(6) Include the tree plan which:
• Shows where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan
shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
• Shows no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
c. The applicant shall evaluate the applicability of rainwater gardens for Lots 6, 7, and 8, in
consideration of the soil conditions permitting drainage.
3. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading.
4. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the, director of community
development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or
approves the final plat.
Commissioner Rossbach seconded.
Commissioner Rossbach asked to have the reference to Lots 6, 7, and 8 removed from 2.c. He
said there were other lots where "these type of things could be incorporated."
This amendment was agreeable to Commissioners Ledvina and Rossbach. Commissioner
Trippler said rainwater gardens should be encouraged by everyone to increase infiltration of
rainwater rather than encouraging runoff.
Ayes All
The motion passed.
Agenda Item I
AGENDA REPORT
To: Cit Mana Michael McGuire `,,,�
From: Chief of Police Donald Win 0
Subject: SECURITY ALARM SY STEM
Date: Jul 6, 1999
introductian
Aotl by Counell
4
In 1998 the Maplewood Police Department began to research • the possibilitv of obtainin a
securit alarm s for the Maplewood Cit facilities. Mone was budgeted in the 1.999 Capit
Improvement Fund to purchase and install the securit s
Backmound .
In the first q uarter o f 1999 the biddin process for a securit
* alarm system, was initiated. Onl one vendor provided a bid on the securit alarm system. The Cit Council directed staff to obtain
additional bids.
The biddin process was reopened with Sergeant Ronald •Becker takin the responsibilit to
contact alarm companies to ensure bids were submitted. Bids were received from s
The hi bid was $73 555.00. The low bid was • $29 043.78. Four ix companies.
because: the were incomplete- Y of the bids were rejected
0 ncomplete or did not meet the specificatiom. Hi of the proposal
included:
• Card access to replace the existin ke locks at the main entr points.
& S based on expandable I' automated access control soft ware.
0 "Smart"') e allowin users to work in, and depart, alarmed zones.
0 Improved closed-circuit video monitorin and recordin of cit • fa
6 es.
Modular expan 9
sion of the s in subse y ears, to off-campus facilities.
Two companies, ADT and Hone met the re • specifications. ADT provided a bi
50 73 d of
$ . 1>3.00. Hone provided a bid of $71,555.
Reco mendat ion
* 0 0
After carefull scrutinizin the bids, it is recommended the* bid be awarded to ADT in the amount
of $5-0,733.00. This recommendation is base on the followin
The ADT proposal is more detailed and appears to have • been comprehensivel desi
to meet ali the crite *a in the RFP.
rl
The ADT proposal includes essential components -that are not included in the other
proposals.
The ADT proposal is the lowest of the two acceptable bids.
Thank y ou for your consideration.
ideration.
Agenda Item?
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: New Century
LOCATION: Highwood Avenue,
DATE: July 6, 1999
west of Century Avenue
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Ration by Council
V ndo , ry a d••.._..,....�..
Vodlf i e
Vejeote
Dat
Mr. Robert Engstrom, representing the Robert Engstrom Companies, is proposing to develop a
residential planned unit development (PUD) called New Century. It would be on a 55 -acre site on
the north side of Highwood Avenue, west of Century Avenue. (Please see the maps starting on
page 20.)
Requests
To build this project, Mr. Engstrom is requesting several city approvals including:
1. Changes to the comprehensive plan. These would be from R -1 (single dwellings) and OS
(open space) to R -1 (single dwellings), RH (residential. high density) and OS (open space)
for the site. (See the existing and proposed land use maps on pages 20 and 21.)
The developer also is proposing that the city drop the planned minor collector street that
would connect the east end of Schaller Drive with Century Avenue. This street would have
gone through this site and through a group of oak trees.
2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) fora 178 -unit
housing development. The applicant is requesting the CUP because the F (farm
residence) and R -1 (single dwelling residential) zoning districts limit the uses to single
dwellings in a typical or standard subdivision. (See the property line /zoning map on page
22.) As proposed, this project would have 76 single dwellings (including the relocated farm
house), 8 twin homes and 92 town houses. Having a PUD gives the city and developer a
chance to be more flexible with site design and development details than the standard
zoning requirements would normally allow. The F and R -1 zoning districts also do not allow
twin homes, town houses or other multiple dwellings..
Mr. Engstrom also wants the city to allow the houses in this development to have mother-
in -law (accessory) apartments and have a variety of front and side -yard setbacks for the
houses and town houses in the development. The city could approve these as part of the
PUD.
3. Street right -of -way and easement vacations. These would be for the unused street right -of-
ways and easements on the site. (See the map on page 24.)
4. A code variation for a substandard cul -de -sac where Schaller Drive meets the developer's
west property line. The proposed development plans do not have a street connection to the
existing temporary cul -de -sac at the east end of Schaller Drive. As such, the developer
p
would need to change the temporary cul -de -sac into a permanent cul -de -sac if the city
approves the proposed development.
5. Reduced building setbacks for the existing houses at 2610 and 2611 Schaller Drive. These
setback approvals are necessary with changing the temporary cul -de -sac on the east end of
Schaller Drive to a permanent cul -de -sac.
6. A variation from the city code to reduce the required street right -of -way width. The developer
is asking to reduce some of the public street right -of -ways from 60 feet to 50 feet.
7. A variation from the city code to reduce the required street pavement width. The developer is
asking to reduce the streets from 32 feet to 28 feet, 24 feet and 20 feet from gutter to gutter.
8. A preliminary plat to create the lots in the development. (See the enclosed maps from the
New Century application materials and the enclosed project plans.)
9. Having no parking for both sides of some of the streets and no parking for one side of other
streets.
10. Waiving the Park Access Charges (PAC) for the building permits.
11. Starting the construction of up to four model homes before the city approves the final plat.
Please also refer to the book of application materials and project plans for more information about
these proposals.
BACKGROUND
June 28, 1999: The city council tabled the New Century project so that staff and the developer
could review and plan for an additional access to Century Avenue. There also was a concern
raised about the street width variations.
Additional information
Information about a new street will be presented at the July 12, 1.999 meeting. Planning staff has
discussed the street width issue with public safety staff. They have indicated that they are
comfortable with the proposal as long as the no parking restrictions are applied.
Since 1993, the council has approved the same street widths with no parking on one side for Oak
Ridge, Maple Woods Estates, Beth Heights, Highwood 4th and Parkview developments. The
narrow streets would provide a larger setback between the street and the homes, possibly save
trees and put less impervious surface on the site.
DISCUSSION
Land Use Plan Changes
To build the proposed plat, Mr. Engstrom wants the city to change the land use plan for the site.
These changes would be from R -1 (single dwelling residential) and OS (open space) to R -1 (single
dwellings), RH (residential high density) and OS (open space) for the site. (See the existing and
proposed land use maps on pages 20 and 21.) The proposed changes to the OS areas are to
reflect the natural areas (wetlands and ponds) that the developer will preserve with this project.
The city intends RH areas for town houses or apartments of up to 16 units per gross acre. For
R -1 areas, the city intends to have primarily single dwellings on 10,000 square -foot lots with a
density of up to 4.1 units per gross acre.
The developer also is proposing that the city drop the planned minor collector street that would
connect the east end of Schaller Drive with Century Avenue. This street would have gone through
this site and through a group of oak trees.
Land use plan . changes do not require specific findings for approval. Any change, however, should
be consistent with the city's land use goals and policies. There are several goals in the
Comprehensive Plan that apply to this request including:
• Provide for orderly development.
• Minimize conflicts between land uses.
• Provide a wide variety of housing types.
• Whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar uses front on the
same street or at borders of areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers.
• Include a variety of housing types for all residents ... including apartments, town houses,
manufactured homes, single - family housing, public- assisted housing, low- and moderate -
income housing, and rental and owner - occupied housing.
• Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative
economic, social or physical impact on adjoining developments.
• The city coordinates land use changes with the character of each neighborhood.
• Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate
buffering and separation.
This is a good site for a mix of housing styles and densities. It is on a major collector street
( Highwood Avenue) and close to an arterial street (Century Avenue) and open space. The project
should be a good neighbor to the nearby homes. There would be single dwellings near most of
the existing single dwellings and there would be a ponding area between the new houses and the
homes to the west and north. The proposed town houses would be a transitional land use between
single dwellings and the existing commercial uses and Interstate 494.
As proposed, the 176 units on the 55 -acre site means there would be 125 units per acre. The
area with Block 8 (Area Iv) is proposed to have four duplexes (8- units) served by a private
driveway from Century Avenue. These 8 units would be on about 1.1 acres for a density of 6.2
units per acre. Each area or housing type would be consistent with the density standards in the
Comprehensive Plan and the overall development density would be consistent with the density
standards recommended by the Metropolitan Council for housing in first -ring suburbs.
Schaller Drive
As I noted earlier, the developer is proposing that the city drop a planned minor collector street
from the land use plan. This street would have been between Linwood and Highwood Avenues
and would have connected the east end of Schaller Drive with Century Avenue. After reviewing
3
the area, the developer determined that this street would have not worked well with the site
topography and the proposed street pattern. In addition, the developer told staff that the neighbors
along Schaller Drive prefer to keep the cul -de -sac and not have Schaller Drive connect to any
streets to the east. This design will keep Schaller Drive as a local street and also would prevent
the street from going through a group of oak trees at the east end of Schaller Drive.
The existing land use plan shows Century Avenue as a major arterial street and Highwood Avenue
as a collector street. These streets are designed and built to carry larger volumes of traffic than
the local or neighborhood streets. The proposed PUD has the main north /south street intersecting
with Century and Highwood Avenues. This street layout will direct the traffic from this development
on to the collector and arterial streets and not on to the local or neighborhood streets. The City
Engineer told me that this street design is preferable to other possible designs and is consistent
with city and county street guidelines.
Conditional Use Permit
The applicant has applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development
(PUD) for the 176 -unit housing development. They are requesting the CUP because the existing F
(farm residential) and R -1 (single dwellings) zoning designations limit the uses to single dwellings.
As proposed, there would be a mix of low- density residential homes, single- family homes, double
dwellings and town houses in a mix of 4, 5 6 8 10 and 12 -unit buildings. The developer intends
to sell all the units and not have any rental units or property in the PUD.
Page 30 of the PUD application materials Lists all the neighborhood areas, their proposed densities
and overall project data and density. As proposed, the 176 dwelling units would be on about 54.7
acres for an overall project density of 3.25 units per acre. For a comparison, the comprehensive
plan allows developments with single dwellings to have up to 4.1 units per gross acre. As such, on
a 54.7 acre site, there could be up to 224 single- family homes.
Mother -in -Law (Accessory) Units
As part of the PUD, Mr. Engstrom wants the city to allow the owners of the single dwellings to
have mother -in -law (accessory) living spaces in their homes if they so choose. On page 26 and 28
of the application materials, Mr. Engstrom outlines the proposed standards for these units. They
would be up to 800 square feet and for one or two persons. In addition, if the owner wants to have
such a unit, the developer would require the owner to have an additional enclosed garage space
beyond the two for the main house.
These units would provide the home owners with a place to have relatives (including a parent or
parents or an adult child) to live near them. This can help when they have to provide for their care
or an inexpensive place for these people to live. As long as there is enough off - street parking to
accommodate the extra residents, these units should not negatively impact the area. Staff expects
that the home owners that would choose to have such a unit would ensure that it would not
degrade their property or the property value. Having the home owner living there, as a landlord and
care taker, should ensure that such units do not cause a problem.
Front and Rear Yard Setbacks
As proposed, with the lot sizes, layouts and site topography, the developer has shown a variety of
house locations on the proposed grading plan. The proposed front yard setbacks shown on the
grading plan do not meet the standard setbacks the city usually requires in the R -1 zoning district.
(Typically, 30 to 35 feet from the front property line.) Having a variety of setbacks in this
development will allow for less mass grading and more individual house styles.
4
Street and Easement Vacations
Mr. Engstrom has asked the city to vacate all the unused street right -of -ways and easements
within the project area. (See the map on page 24.) The developer will be dedicating new streets
and easements with the final plat(s). However, for the city to vacate a right -of -way or easement,
the council must find that there is no public interest in keeping the right -of -way or easement.
Code Variation - Substandard Cul -de -sac
Converting the existing Schaller Drive temporary cul -de -sac into a permanent cul -de -sac would
prevent more traffic from getting on Ferndale Street, Sterling Street and Schaller Drive. However,
this change would create at least three problems:
1. The permanent cul -de -sac would be substandard. Since it is a temporary cul -de -sac, the right -
of -way diameter. is 100 feet, the pavement diameter is 86 .feet and there is no curb. The Code
requires a right -of -way diameter of 120 feet, and curb and .gutter. While there is no Code
requirement, a permanent cul- de- sac diameter is usually 94 feet. If the Council approves this
option, they need to approve a Code variation for a substandard cul -de -sac width and require
that the developer overlay the pavement and install curb and gutter.
2. The city does not have a permanent easement for the cul -de -sac bulb. This cul -de -sac was built
into the yards of 2610 and 2611 Schaller Drive with only a temporary easement for the cul -de-
sac bulb. If the City decides to make this cul -de -sac permanent, they should require that the
developer get permanent easements from the two abutting property owners to the city.
3. The two abutting houses are too close to the street. The garage at 2610 Schaller Drive is about
10 feet from the cul -de -sac easement while the garage at 2611 Schaller Drive is about 18 feet
away. The Code requires a minimum of 30 feet. Both garages are also about 10 feet and 18
feet, respectively, from the pavement. If the Council approves this option, they should approve
reduced setbacks for these two houses. Both owners wound prefer less traffic on their street to
getting their yards back. (See the memo from Jeff Johnson on page 43.)
Code Variation - Reduced Street Right -of -Way Widths
The proposed plat shows several of the public streets with 50- foot -wide street right -of -ways. These
include the cul -de -sacs that are on either side of the main north /south street that runs through the
site. Section 29 -53 of the Maplewood City Code requires local residential streets to have 60 feet
of right -of -way. The developer is proposing to have 20 and 24 -foot wide streets in the 50- foot -wide
right -of -ways. These narrower street right -of -ways with narrower street pavement widths will
require less grading and less tree removal on the site. The additional right -of -way is not necessary
for public health, safety, welfare or convenience.
Code Variation - Reduced Street Pavement Widths
Section 29 -52 of the city code requires that local streets be 32 feet wide (gutter to gutter). The
code says that the city council may permit variations from this requirement in specific areas that do
not effect the general purpose of this section. Mr. Engstrom wants to build 28- foot -wide, 24 -foot-
wide and 20- foot -wide streets. I had the Fire Chief and the Fire Marshall review this request. As
long as the access standards of the Uniform Fire Code are met or exceeded (with parking
restrictions), they did not express a preference about the street widths. Since 1993, the council
has approved the same street widths with no parking on one side for the Oak Ridge, Maple Woods
5
Estates, Beth Heights, Highwood Estates 4th and Parkview developments. The narrower streets
would provide a larger setback between the street and the homes and would put less impervious
surface on the site.
Preliminary Plat
Density and Lot Size
Several neighbors thought that there were too many lots in this plat and that they were too small.
As proposed, the single - family Lots range from 8,916. square feet to 38,614 square feet with an
average lot size of about 16,000 square feet. The city requires each lot in the R -1 (single dwelling)
zoning district to have at least 75 feet of frontage and have at least 10,000 square feet. All but
nine of the 75 proposed single dwelling lots would meet or exceed the city's R -1 zoning standards.
Public Utilities
There are sanitary sewer and water in Schaller Drive, Highwood Avenue and Century Avenue to
serve the proposed development. The developer will extend the water main from the east end of
Schaller Drive and from Ferndale Street at Highwood Avenue into and through the site. The Saint
Paul Water Utility will need to approve the water plan.
Trees
As proposed, the contractor for Engstrom Companies would grade the street right -of -ways, the
proposed pond and parts of the lots (including some house pads) where it is necessary to provide
safe slopes. This grading would disturb about 66 large trees and about 40 acres of the 55 -acre site
while preserving many of the steep slopes and most of the large trees on the site. (See the
proposed tree preservation plan on page 29.) The builders would locate the houses on the lots and
then grade the lots as would be necessary for storm water drainage. With the proposed lot sizes
and grading plan, many of the natural features (including many large trees) would remain after the
developer finishes their proposed grading.
Maplewood's tree ordinance requires there be at least ten trees per gross acre on the site after
grading. For this site, the ordinance requires that at least 550 large trees. remain. If the developer
cannot keep that many large trees, the ordinance requires him to plant replacement trees. This
would be up to a maximum of 10 trees per gross acre so there are at least 550 trees on the site.
The applicant has designed the plat to preserve the main tree groupings on the site. As proposed
with the preservation and planting plans, the applicant is exceeding the required minimum of ten
trees per acre as the code requires.
Trails
The developer's plans show several walking paths and sidewalks in the development. These
include wood chip paths between the Village Green and the east end of Schaller Drive, a path
along the west side of the site between Schaller Drive and the city open space and a path from the
west end of Promontory Place and the city open space. There also would be a 5- foot -wide
concrete sidewalk on the east side of New Century Boulevard between Highwood and Century
Avenues and around the Village Green.
City staff believes that a paved trail between the east end of Schaller Drive and the proposed
White Oak Circle cul -de -sac would serve as an important pedestrian link between the existing and
proposed neighborhoods. This is especially important since the developer does not want to extend
X
Schaller Drive to the east into the development. This trail could run between Lots 4 and 5, Block 2
to connect the two streets. The developer also is proposing to extend the water main from Schaller
Drive between these two lots. The developer could have the trail installed over this water main to
help provide and maintain a clear access to the water main. To prevent any confusion about
ownership and property rights for trails, the county recommends that the city have the developer
locate the trail in a right -of -way on the plat.
For paved off- street paths, Maplewood requires 8- foot -wide bituminous paths centered in a right -
of -way that is at least 10 feet wider than the trail. As such, the trailway for the trail between Lots 4
and 5, Block 2 needs to be at least 18 feet wide to meet this code requirement. The developer
should build a fence on both sides of the paved trail within this plat. The city should require the
developer to install the trails and fences with the street and before final plat approval. This is to
ensure that the lot buyers know that the trail is there.
Wetlands
The developer had the wetlands on the site delineated by a trained wetland professional. The
watershed district has classified all but one of these wetlands as Type II wetlands. Maplewood's
wetland protection ordinance requires a 50- foot -wide wetland buffer around these wetlands.
Building foundations must be at least 60 feet from these wetlands.. In addition, the code does not
allow any ground disturbance within the buffer area.
The first plans and project information submitted by the applicant for the PUD (dated March 29,
1999) did not meet all the wetland setback standards. However, the revised preliminary plat and
grading plans dated May 24, 1999, meet Maplewood's wetland ordinance standards. The
contractor should place the silt and safety fence so they protect the buffers during all construction.
Drainage - Watershed District
Most of the site drains t0 the south and east towards Highwood and Century Avenues. A concern
of several neighbors with this proposal is storm water drainage. The developer's engineer told me
that by using the proposed and existing ponds as storm water detention facilities, the development
will not increase the rate of storm water runoff from the site. That is, the runoff leaving the site will
be at or below current levels.
The Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District has been working with the developer on the
proposed project plans. Robert Engstrom Companies or the contractor must get a permit from the
watershed district before starting grading or construction.
On- Street Parking Standards
The applicant is proposing street widths from 18 feet to 28 feet in the development. I had the Fire
Chief and Fire Marshall review the proposed streets and their widths. According to Article 9,
Section 902 of the Uniform Fire Code, all fire access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not
less than 20 feet. As such, all the streets and driveways in this development must be at least 20
feet wide with no parking on either side of the street. If the developer or the city want to allow
parking on one side of the streets, then the streets must be at least 28 feet wide.
Park Access Charges (PAC Fees)
The project plans prepared by the developer show several amenities that are not usually included
in a residential development. These include a sidewalk, boulevard trees and the village green with
its building, tot -lot, gardens and play area. The developer has asked the city to waive the park
7
access charges (PAC fees) for the residential building permits because he is proposing to install
the amenities with the project.
Bruce Anderson, the Maplewood Parks. and Recreation Director, reviewed this request. His
response is in the memo starting on page 38. His recommendation is to follow the city's PAC fee
schedule and not waive the park access charges for this development.
Early Start to Construction
Mr. Engstrom has asked the city for permission to start building up to four model homes on Red
Pine Circle (Valley mew Circle) before the city approves the final plat. As long as there are utilities
and a hard surface street or driveway to the structure., this request should not be a problem. The
developer would not be able to sell any houses until Ramsey County records the final plat for those
lots.
COMMISSION ACTION
On June 7, 1999, the planning commission held a public hearing about the proposed New Century
PUD. The commission recommended approval of 11 of the developer's 12 requests, including the
Land use plan changes and the PUD. The only request the commission recommended denial of
was the proposal to allow the construction of up to four model homes before having a final plat.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Approve the resolution on page 44. This resolution changes the land use plan for the New
Century residential development,. north of Highwood Avenue, west of Century Avenue. These
changes are from R -1 (single dwellings) and OS (open. space) to R -1 (single dwellings), R-
3(H)..(residential high density) and OS (open space) for the site. This resolution also drops
the planned minor collector street between the east end of Schaller Drive and Century
Avenue. The city is making these changes because:
1. The development would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive
plan
2. This town house site in the development is proper for and consistent with the city's
policies for high- density residential use. This includes:
a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing and proposed low density
residential and commercial land uses.
b. It is on a collector street and is near an arterial street, parks and open space.
3. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because:
a. The proposed on -site pond and large setback from the street will separate the town
houses from nearby homes.
b. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values.
c. There would be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing local
residential streets.
4. The city nor the developer plan to build the proposed collector street between the east
end of Schaller Drive and Century Avenue because the existing wetlands and trees would
snake it difficult to build a street in this area.
B. Approve the resolution starting on page 45. This resolution approves a conditional use
permit for a planned unit development for the New Century housing development. The city
bases this approval on the findings required by code. (Refer to the resolution for the specific
findings.) Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans date - stamped March 29, 1999 and the revised
preliminary plat and grading plans dated May 24, 1999, except where the city requires
changes. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree and driveway and parking
lot plans.
4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The
developer shall give the city an easement for this pond and shall be responsible for
getting any needed off -site pond and drainage easements.
5. The developer or contractor shall:
a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements
and meet all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs
shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing,
vegetation cutting, filling or dumping.
d. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
e. Remove any debris, junk or fill from the wetlands and site.
6.* The developer shall give the city wetland easements over the wetlands. The easements
shall cover the wetlands and any land within 50 feet surrounding a Class II wetland.
These easements shall prohibit any building, mowing., cutting, filling or dumping within
twenty feet of the wetland or within the wetland itself. The purpose of this easement is
to protect the water quality of the wetlands from fertilizer and to protect the wetland
habitat from encroachment.
7. The owners of the single dwellings in the PUD may have one mother -in -law (accessory)
apartment with their property. Such accessory units shall be subject to the following:
a. Such accessory units may be occupied by one or two persons.
Wt
b. The accessory units shall not be more than 800 square feet.
c. The city will not allow separate or different ownership for tax or identification purposes
of the accessory unit from the primary residence.
8. The approved setbacks for the principal structures in the New Century PUD shall be:
1. Front yard setback: minimum - 20 feet, maximum - 50 feet
2. Front yard setback (side street): minimum -15 feet, maximum - 30 feet
3. Rear yard setback: minimum - 30 feet, maximum - none
4. Side yard setback: as the zoning code requires
9. This approval does not include the final design approval for the duplexes, townhomes or
for the village green. The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping and site
plans for these to the community design review board (CDRB) for approval by the CDRB.
10. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
C. Approve the resolution starting on page 48. This resolution vacates parts of the unused Tim
Avenue, Mayhill Road and Phyllis Avenue lying north of Highwood Avenue and west of Century
Avenue in the New Century PUD (as shown on the map on page 63 of developers application
materials). It is in the public interest to vacate these right -of -ways for the following reasons:
1. The adjacent properties have adequate street access.
2. These right -of -ways are not needed for the public purpose of street construction.
3. The existing right -of -ways are too narrow for street construction.
4. The developer will be dedicating new right -of -ways with the final plat for the project.
D. Approve the resolution on page 50. This resolution vacates: the unused drainage and roadway
easements lying east of Schaller Drive, west of Century Avenue and north of Highwood
Avenue in the New Century PUD (as shown on the map on page 63 of developers application
materials). It is in the public interest to vacate these easements for the following reasons:
1. The adjacent properties have adequate street access.
2. These easements are not needed for their original public purposes.
3. The developer will be dedicating new easements with the final plat for the project.
E. Approve the resolution on page 52. This resolution is for a Code variation for a substandard
cul -de -sac where Schaller Drive meets the developer's west property line. The variation is
because:
1. Building a larger cul -de -sac would further encroach into the yards and setbacks of the
existing homes.
2. The existing cul -de -sac is adequate for snow plowing and access to the homes.
3. There are only two homes that have driveways off the cul -de -sac.
F. Approve reduced building setbacks for 2610 and 2611 Schaller Drive. Approval is because:
1. The setbacks are not affecting the privacy of adjacent homes.
2. The homes are at the same setback as the adjacent homes.
3. The reduced setback is caused by changing a temporary cul -de -sac to a permanent
setback.
10
G. Adopt the resolution starting on page 53. This resolution approves a city code variation to have
50- foot -wide street right -of -ways instead of the 60- foot -wide right -of -ways in the New Centur
PUD. The city should approve this code variation because:
1. The variation will lessen the amount of grading, ground disturbance and tree removal in
the development.
2. The additional right -of -way is not necessary for public health, safety, welfare or
convenience.
H. Adopt the resolution starting on page 55. This resolution approves a city code variation for 28-
foot -wide, 24 -foot -wide and 20- foot -wide public streets in the New Century PUD. This variation
is subject to the following conditions:
1. There shall be no parking on one side of the 28- foot -wide streets.
2. There shall be no parking on both sides of any street less than 28 feet wide.
3. The developer shall pay the city for the cost of the no- parking signs.
Approve the New Century preliminary plat (received by the city on March 26, 1999 and the
revised preliminary plat and grading plans received by the city on May 24, 1999). The
developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat:
1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and
meet all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Have NSP install Group V rate street lights in at least nine locations - primarily at street
intersections. The exact style and location shall be subject to the city engineer's
approval.
d. Pay the city for the cost of traffic- control, street identification and no parking signs.
e. Provide all required and necessary easements.
f. Demolish, remove or move the existing house and buildings at 2665 Highwood
Avenue, and all other buildings, scrap metal, debris, vehicles and junk from the site.
g. Cap, seal and abandon all wells on site and remove any septic systems or drainfields
within the plat, subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines.
h. Complete all the curb and gutter on the Schaller Drive cul -de -sac to the west side of
the site, repair the cul -de -sac pavement and restore and sod the boulevards.
I. For the trails, do the following:
(1) Construct an eight- foot -wide paved walkway between Lots 4 and 5, Block 2 as
shown on the plat date - stamped May 24, 1999. This trail shall be in an 18 -foot-
wide trailway or pedestrian way.
11
(2) The developer also shall build the wood -chip trails and sidewalks as shown on
the application materials and project plans.
(3) The developer shall install posts at the end of the trails to prevent cars or
trucks from using the trail.
(4) The developer shall build the trails and sidewalks with the streets.
(5) The city engineer must approve these plans.
j. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs
shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing,
vegetation cutting, filling, grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve
the sign design and location before the contractor installs them. The developer or
contractor shall install these signs before the city issues building permits in this plat.
k. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
1. Install signs where the driveways for the twin homes and for the town houses intersect
the public streets indicating that they are private driveways.
m. Have an independent qualified geotechnical engineering and soil testing firm monitor
and inspect the pond during its construction. The city shall pre- approve the inspection
firm(s) before they start their work.
2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail, sidewalk and street
plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code.
b. The grading plan shall show:
(1) The proposed building pad elevation and contour .information for each home
site. The lot lines on this .plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat.
(2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
(3) House pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save
large trees.
(4) The proposed street grades as allowed by the city engineer.
(5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve
the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper
than 3:1.
(6) All retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a
building permit from the city.
(7) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the
city engineer.
C.* The tree plan shall:
12
(1) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or final plat approval.
(2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan
shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
(3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous
trees shall be at least two and one half (2'/) inches in diameter and shall be
a mix of red and white oaks, ash and sugar maples. The coniferous trees shall
be at least eight (8) feet tall and .shall be a mix of Austrian pine and other
species.
(4) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
(5) Include for city staff a detailed boulevard tree planting plan and material list.
d. The street and utility plans shall show:
(1) Paved walkways in a trailway or pedestrian way as shown on the proposed
plans and between Lots 4 and 5, Block 2. The parks and recreation director
shall approve their design.
(2) The public streets shall be a 9 -ton design with a maximum street grade of eight
percent and the maximum street grade within 75 feet of all intersections at two
percent.
(3) All the streets, parking areas and driveways with continuous concrete curb and
gutter except where the city engineer decides that it is not needed for drainage
purposes.
(4) All public street right -of -ways shall be at least 60- feet -wide, unless the city
council approves a narrower street right -of -way.
(5) The completion of the curb and gutter on the existing Schaller Drive cul -de -sac,
the repair or replacement of the cul -de -sac pavement and the restoration and
sodding of the boulevards around the cul -de -sac.
e. The drainage plan shall ensure that there is no increase in the rate of storm water run-
off leaving the site above the current (predevelopment) levels.
f. A qualified geotechnical engineer shall design the storm water pond proposed at the
southeast corner of the site. The proposed design shall be subject to a quality
engineering peer review and recommendation by a geotechnical engineer approved
by the city engineer. The developer shall pay for this review. The developer's
consultants shall complete this review and approval before submitting the final
construction plans to the city engineer. Additional subsurface soil evaluations also
shall be required within the proposed pond and berm areas.
3. Change the plat as follows:
a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer.
b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These
easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet
wide along the side property lines.
13
c. Revise the lot lines in Block Two so there is an 18- foot -wide trail or pedestrian way
between Lots 4 and 5 to accommodate the trail and watermain to Schaller Drive.
d. Show the wetland boundaries on the final plat as approved by the watershed district.
e. Show all public street right -of -ways at 60 feet wide, unless the city council approves
narrower street right -of -ways.
f. Make as many of the property lines as is reasonably possible radial to the cul -de -sacs
or perpendicular to the street right -of -ways.
g. Change the 40- foot -wide trail easement at the west end of Promontory Place (Dahl
Avenue) (between Lots 12 and 13, Block 1) to a 40- foot -wide trail or pedestrian way.
4. Secure and provide all required easements for the development. These shall include:
a. Any off -site drainage and utility easements.
b. Wetland easements over the wetlands and any land within 50 feet surrounding a Class
11 wetland. The easement shall prohibit any building or structures within 50 feet of the
Class 11 wetland or any mowing, cutting, filling, grading or dumping within 50 feet of the
wetland or within the wetland itself.
The purpose of these easements is to protect the water quality of the wetlands from
fertilizer and runoff. They also are to protect the wetland habitat from encroachment.
5. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site
drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that
the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval.
6. Record the following with the final plat:
a. All homeowners association documents.
b. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits driveways on Lots 11 and 12, Block 4 from
going onto Highwood Avenue.
c. Deeds dedicating the necessary wetland buffer easements surrounding any wetland.
d. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision or splitting of the
lots or parcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless approved
by the city council.
The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the
city for approval before recording.
7. Show the wetland boundaries on the plat as approved by the watershed district. A trained
and qualified person must delineate the wetlands. This person shall prepare a wetland
delineation report. The developer shall submit this wetland information to the Watershed
District office. The Watershed District must approve this information before the city
approves a final plat. If needed, the developer shall change the plat to meet wetland
regulations.
8. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading.
14
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community
development, may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit
or approves the final plat.
J.
L.
Take no action on the request to waive the Park Access Charges (PAC) for the building
permits for the New Century residential PUD. This development would be north of Highwood
Avenue and west of Century Avenue.
Adopt the resolution on page 57. This resolution is for the on- street parking standards and no
on- street parking requirements for the New Century PUD north of Highwood Avenue and west
of Century Avenue.
Approve the developer's request to start the construction of up to four model homes on Red
Pine Circle (Valley View Circle) before the city approves the final plat. This is subject to the
following conditions:
1. There shall be utilities and a hard surface street or driveway to each building location
before the city issues a building permit.
2. The builder shall have each structure surveyed into place by a registered land surveyor.
15
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
I surveyed the owners of the 85 properties within 350 feet of this site and received five written replies.
1. We like the idea of changing the temporary cul -de -sac into a permanent cul -de -sac and not
have the street (Schaller Drive) connect with Century Avenue. (Swanson - 2595 Schaller
Drive)
2. Our concern involves water run -off from the proposed sites into the existing holding ponds. An
increase in the water level could cause flooding and /or other adverse effects on the existing
houses. (Woolridge - 900 Ferndale Street South)
3. 1 feel that any "improvements" needed for Highwood Avenue should be paid for by the
developer of this new tract. (Hammer 2666 Highwood Avenue)
Also see the letter on page 40, the memo on page 41 and the petition on pages 42 and 43.
I also received several telephone calls from nearby residents. They expressed concerns about storm
water drainage, the proposed housing mix (including town houses), possible assessments and
increased traffic on Highwood Avenue.
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 55 acres
Existing land use: A single dwelling and accessory buildings at 2665 Highwood Avenue
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Houses on the south side of Linwood Avenue
South: Houses across Highwood Avenue
West: Residences on Ferndale Street and Schaller Drive, Maplewood open space
East: Houses on the west side of Century Avenue
PLANNING
Existing Land Use Plan designations: R -1 (single dwellings) and OS (open space)
Existing Zoning: F (farm residence)
Proposed Land Use Plan designations: R -1 (single dwellings), OS (open space) and RH (residential
high density)
Reasons for the Requests
This proposal needs a land use plan change because:
1. State law does not allow a city to adopt any regulation that conflicts with its comprehensive plan.
2. One of the findings required by code for a CUP is that the use is in conformity with the city's
comprehensive plan.
ire
The land use plan shows this site for R -1 and OS uses, which do not include multiple- family housing.
The developer is applying for a CUP because the zoning on this site is F (farm residence). The F
zoning allows farms and single dwellings. The developer chose to apply for a CUP, rather than a zone
change. A CUP for a PUD is only for a specific use and site plan. A rezoning to R -1 (single dwellings)
and to R -3 (multiple dwelling residential) would allow a variety of single dwellings and a variety of
multiple- dwelling uses and plans.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
There are no specific criteria for land use plan change. Any land use plan change should be
consistent with the goals and policies in the city's comprehensive plan.
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards.
Refer to the findings in the resolution on pages 45 and 46.
Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve
plans:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring,
existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not. impair the desirability of
investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use
and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic
hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the
surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive
development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan.
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment
for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition,
materials, textures and colors.
HOUSING POLICIES
The land use plan has eleven general land use goals. Of these, three apply to this proposal. They are:
minimize land planned for streets, minimize conflicts between land uses and provide many housing
types. The land use plan also has several general development and residential development policies
that relate to this project. They are:
Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic,
social or physical impact on adjoining developments.
Include a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic, racial, cultural
or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should include apartments, town
houses, manufactured homes, single- family housing, public- assisted housing and low -to-
moderate- income housing, and rental and owner - occupied housing.
Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate
buffering and separation.
The housing plan also has policies about housing diversity and quality that the city should
consider with this development. They are:
17
Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the city. These are
to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with. special needs and nontraditional
households.
The city will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and price
ranges through its land use plan.
The city's long -term stability of its tax base depends upon its ability to attract and keep residents of all
ages. To do so, the city must insure that a diverse mix of housing styles is available in each stage of
the life cycle of housing needs.
kr /p: /sec13- 28 /newcentr. mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Land Use Plan Map (Existing)
3. Land Use Plan Map (Proposed)
4. Property Line /Zoning Map
5. New Century Parcel Exhibit
6. New Century Vacated Street and Easement Exhibit
7. New Century Preliminary Plat Exhibit dated May 24, 1999
8. Revised New Century Information dated May 24, 1999
9. New Century PUD Housing Area Designation Exhibit
10. New Century PUD Preserved Natural Open Space Exhibit
11. New Century PUD Development Plan Exhibit
12. New Century Tree Preservation Plan Exhibit
13. New Century Typical Lot Exhibit
14. New Century Village Green Site Plan Exhibit
15. Memo from Donald Winger dated 6 -22 -99
16. Memo from Bruce Anderson dated 4 -20 -99
17. 4 -22 -99 letter from Carver (2714 Highwood Avenue)
18. 4 -29 -99 memo from Jeff Johnson (2610 Schaller ,Drive)
19. Neighborhood Petition received by the city on June 8, 1999
20. Land Use Plan Change Resolution (R -1 and OS to R -1, OS and R -3(H))
21. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Resolution
22. Street Right -of -Way Vacation Resolution
23. Easement Vacation Resolution
24. Code Variation Resolution - Substandard Cul -De -Sac
25. Code Variation Resolution Reduced Street Right -of -Way Widths
26. Code Variation Resolution - Reduced Street Pavement Widths
27. No Parking Resolution
28. Developer's Application Book (separate attachment)
29. Project Plans (separate attachments - including 11 x1 7s (color & B &W) and full -size)
W
,r�
Attachment 1
-rte NT �N Po WSE Y =W L �
CMRECnomL
Q FACILJTY Q
LoN i w. [El Ro U
�� W o 39
W KI
MAIU ST, � O'Du1Y
o � o
vrde +ft z 1• CRESTVIEW
0 FOREST
i r�ucw DR. z 2. OM �'" �
• IDGE DR.
16 0: O
HI WOOD
Z o`� � o °
2' � DR. �
Cl
1. HUNTINGTON CT. � SPR � � Cr. � 25
2. OiAKRIDGE W.
7 20S g� LJNWOOD R � AVE.
a tlL AVE. VNW
ZO
TI E
17 TIMBER TR.
� � v
CT. v
t. CURRIE CT. VALLEY
V �� A VE.
. ....
2. VALLEY VIEW CT. 3
3. LAKEWOOD cr. 74 �v.
O � 2 . HIGHWOOD
} o N
cc o
EM
AVE N
Q11K HElGFf15 py*�oM�iin So�C
SIN �i Ca rver
BOXWOOD s � � � Lake
FM Clook
AVE. � � Z P"
CC J
�
cc
OO � CARVER AVE 72
OVERL00 O
w�
LOCATION MAP
79
4
N
Attachment 2
J%
major collector
Linwood
AV
R-1
0
Os
E
OS P :::: ;SITE
0-
00 0 0
\\ecko� 00
00
ca minor �.�
1 ;•• TTT
... ...............
cdllecft��l M no r fJ
Highwood---
LL B
.21 -.f- IN 7 t •.f
0
CD al
0
01
0 0 . - 5 E S r y
1 0 p
0 os minor •
E �MM�M�
collector R 1
X': AWL r
o
OS ��'
CO
Carver
n1lectc f
oc
REVISED R
cc
7-20-95
LEGEND,
8-19-96) I P = PARK
OS OPEN SPACE
2-27 -97
R-1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS
R-3(H) = RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY
BC = BUSINESS COMMERCIAL
10
LAND USE MAP
....
SITE (EXISTING)
cO
4
Attachment 3
Linwood
ca
a.
c
co
Highwood
Carver
REVISED
7 -20 -95
8 -19 -96
2 -27 -97
L
c�
L
0
C
C
a�
M
L
0
u
E
r--BC
0
0
LEGEND '
P = PARK
OS = OPEN SPACE
R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS
R -3(H) = RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY
a BC = BUSINESS COMMERCIAL
LAND USE MAP
(PROPOSED)
zi
4
N
Attachment 4
L
/ r
2516'.'
1
1
� = 2 , 's*
.3
% (a3) 1
0: (11, 5.40ee.
al
21
10 MAPLEWOOD OPEN SPACE
_Q 1 cs1) I
S ITE 3�
s (14-j'
Aso,
as 4
V10 8 r
� 4 5C.3'J•• ;' j70.4r'•
Q� t � r � ti�� M ■ r 1!!L. - �tioo� es e�•nse�f
Aw IF
--� - -`'' ovrLor 1� ± 1 � a 00 D! I CO O 1 ss O ! 2 1 o � (0 E E >M o
N(9T _ c 8 qq y� � S L N w ,• RtDONO+� 0)•07•!9 b
1 X 0 l'! 4`�c3 � ) "N)N►) "N ►N - - - - - -- - - -�
D R ,
• 3 ' • lZ 1 ` ' ! ►16.11, 0 90 90 IZS
:00 Co
co
•'• Z o(pS) 3 �Sr �1 v :� _ Ins � r
t • ,0(83) , ..- { 9J 3f
1
� *�o 3 rW oo
1 1 , (mss•
N il
r wog 3 �a q4) % % 7 , •• S �
f r t Af T7�
ON n ti
um
4L55 o 1 R
(70) �. �3 i 2 N 3K 41.0 s _ , 6 s �'.. w g16
tt1.>:f 90 n o
' • O w
HI H O D"
� ~' o �• w ��� '121 13• (i4� L5� (16; 1� - 2585 ' 92491
AVE - i••••) . ►. .
E o VALLEY ,s V1 EVY AVE.
. ,= 932
23• t4 . is
a 1 14 ° ' 9j ;i ° {S4) . (L) ; `� ; ; O C 943 . N
o 1 , 2 lb ! 4 1 S 3 6 7 N 940
.�)
-czT)� 1 �?
A,u 1N
41. �. _- -: •� 953 0 �.
I.os.r pp
• ��.95a� 13 12 p eF e
A • , a f;- o � {s) �•) K 31 ' � ~ N ~ 963 1�.�•.• ;_ N :i
_ 174, Z, _- 7m om H_ IGHWOOD AVENUE � -
1".44 60 _ (S5 _ .� io :'t4q � t4n - 4.0 140 . • 136./,1 60
� s
1 , (35) 12! 1� a 967 �' - :968. 967> ,R
_ s 1!t - - - �o •..� 966' 2660
N 1 ` / 0 - �
'H IG DP ,i: 2( » 9- a 2f 12 J Iac.• 99.6E �'
C,
11 : ` � �' ° __ 975 � J v 9 760 d 975; �, $ � (10
lw.e /54.M I'3f � _
M 983 , 98
v � ,9
w •
3.�bse vi �• (3 m i!z)10 ' e� .3 its) �, (toy 11 ~ O �� 983- _
N' � z 147 r f
.o �g4 •'
(� �• 1 101 '• K Q O 140 Ib -� n
^ , :4 >�: , Q o �> � � � 4 (z4) � � ," �';. ° � ', cap " W , 992 2.981- N zZ
. Of0 1 (38� T 0 p.
's,..e : oo ft ,, }8 ; s u�^ Es AT �(e� s H N
m t (. � >r ! C7 H �� Z to s
f 1
/ c 1 •. � 6 .za) u ��N-- -1�_3L ` . (9l 6 Z2� ( 43) i
0 / 1 ('4) - s 1 .., • '�° "° 98 ,+o � !sue• ���
SITE
2.47aa.
•
Z
O
U
--AV ;1 -.— -tom- §5 N ■ KW V
Go
t0 co O i _ QP /
co N a �, 1 °
N _ r /
Pit
h. ,
►�; MCI TOWER _
F . .......; Z
1 , e
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
22
1
801
� 1
+1 , 81
k
5'
.44.
821 • , �,
- lice. zs
�2) 1 41 ,
8 3 4 m
W, p
841 z
13 "' 859 ° >
' - Q
t,g73
z
10 877 w
V
V 6• r.
t N—
5
o e .j 7 -
64 909
.75,0e � 72
.75
(3) 923
t
RAM SEY COUNTY. PROPERTY
A LINWOOD AVENUE,
=
.--
- .- ;–�—
120 . '' 0o co
1.33 &. N
N
O
es
0
eo as
00 00 ,"
_
721
.�
o .�
N, IN�
2616 co 2632 4, �'
co
:c1) n N
co c°, ;
NI
.65 o.c.
N
N
«�
f ��
�� 743 + ,
0.95. 0.c1.., •
try
.ie.�
-+�x
• ��)
�•)
_ V67 - ,
. •
coat.
so (3) 751 _ a
-
(1 O) .
a.�
3.S�oe
775
C ho
l floe-)
F 4u
� = 2 , 's*
.3
% (a3) 1
0: (11, 5.40ee.
al
21
10 MAPLEWOOD OPEN SPACE
_Q 1 cs1) I
S ITE 3�
s (14-j'
Aso,
as 4
V10 8 r
� 4 5C.3'J•• ;' j70.4r'•
Q� t � r � ti�� M ■ r 1!!L. - �tioo� es e�•nse�f
Aw IF
--� - -`'' ovrLor 1� ± 1 � a 00 D! I CO O 1 ss O ! 2 1 o � (0 E E >M o
N(9T _ c 8 qq y� � S L N w ,• RtDONO+� 0)•07•!9 b
1 X 0 l'! 4`�c3 � ) "N)N►) "N ►N - - - - - -- - - -�
D R ,
• 3 ' • lZ 1 ` ' ! ►16.11, 0 90 90 IZS
:00 Co
co
•'• Z o(pS) 3 �Sr �1 v :� _ Ins � r
t • ,0(83) , ..- { 9J 3f
1
� *�o 3 rW oo
1 1 , (mss•
N il
r wog 3 �a q4) % % 7 , •• S �
f r t Af T7�
ON n ti
um
4L55 o 1 R
(70) �. �3 i 2 N 3K 41.0 s _ , 6 s �'.. w g16
tt1.>:f 90 n o
' • O w
HI H O D"
� ~' o �• w ��� '121 13• (i4� L5� (16; 1� - 2585 ' 92491
AVE - i••••) . ►. .
E o VALLEY ,s V1 EVY AVE.
. ,= 932
23• t4 . is
a 1 14 ° ' 9j ;i ° {S4) . (L) ; `� ; ; O C 943 . N
o 1 , 2 lb ! 4 1 S 3 6 7 N 940
.�)
-czT)� 1 �?
A,u 1N
41. �. _- -: •� 953 0 �.
I.os.r pp
• ��.95a� 13 12 p eF e
A • , a f;- o � {s) �•) K 31 ' � ~ N ~ 963 1�.�•.• ;_ N :i
_ 174, Z, _- 7m om H_ IGHWOOD AVENUE � -
1".44 60 _ (S5 _ .� io :'t4q � t4n - 4.0 140 . • 136./,1 60
� s
1 , (35) 12! 1� a 967 �' - :968. 967> ,R
_ s 1!t - - - �o •..� 966' 2660
N 1 ` / 0 - �
'H IG DP ,i: 2( » 9- a 2f 12 J Iac.• 99.6E �'
C,
11 : ` � �' ° __ 975 � J v 9 760 d 975; �, $ � (10
lw.e /54.M I'3f � _
M 983 , 98
v � ,9
w •
3.�bse vi �• (3 m i!z)10 ' e� .3 its) �, (toy 11 ~ O �� 983- _
N' � z 147 r f
.o �g4 •'
(� �• 1 101 '• K Q O 140 Ib -� n
^ , :4 >�: , Q o �> � � � 4 (z4) � � ," �';. ° � ', cap " W , 992 2.981- N zZ
. Of0 1 (38� T 0 p.
's,..e : oo ft ,, }8 ; s u�^ Es AT �(e� s H N
m t (. � >r ! C7 H �� Z to s
f 1
/ c 1 •. � 6 .za) u ��N-- -1�_3L ` . (9l 6 Z2� ( 43) i
0 / 1 ('4) - s 1 .., • '�° "° 98 ,+o � !sue• ���
SITE
2.47aa.
•
Z
O
U
--AV ;1 -.— -tom- §5 N ■ KW V
Go
t0 co O i _ QP /
co N a �, 1 °
N _ r /
Pit
h. ,
►�; MCI TOWER _
F . .......; Z
1 , e
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
22
1
801
� 1
+1 , 81
k
5'
.44.
821 • , �,
- lice. zs
�2) 1 41 ,
8 3 4 m
W, p
841 z
13 "' 859 ° >
' - Q
t,g73
z
10 877 w
V
V 6• r.
t N—
5
o e .j 7 -
64 909
.75,0e � 72
.75
(3) 923
t
Attachment 5
fl I
0 75 150 300
NORTH
SCALE: 1" = 300'
DEVELOPER:
Robert E. Engstrom
Robert Engstrom
Companies, #101
4801 W 81st Street,
Mpls, MN 55437
612 -893 -1001
A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT
FOR THE CITY
OF MAPLE
:7j
v
z
ENGINEERING BY:.
Glen Rehbein Company
8651 Naples Street N.E.
Blaine MN 55449
612- 7840657
Engineering:
William McCully
Surveying:
Tim Kitonen
PLANNING &
ARCHITECTURE BY:
J.B UXELL
ARCHfTEMRE LID.
129 NCKTHSECC>NDSIFffr, #101
MINNFAR71.I5, MINNESOM 55401
23 Parcel Exhibit
Planned Unit Development
F fUC (G12) 338-0090
Attachment 6
0 75 150 300
NORTH
SCALE: 1" = 300'
DEVELOPER:
Robert E. Engstrom
Robert Engstrom
Companies, #101
4801 W 81st Street,
Mpls, MN 55437
612 -893 -1001
A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT
FOR THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
I ff
v
24 Easement Exhibit
Planned Unit Development
ENGINEERING BY:
Glen Rehbein Company
8651 Naples Street N.E.
Blaine MN 55449
612 - 784 -0657
Engineering:
William McCully
Surveying:
Tim Kitonen
PLANNING &
ARCHITECTURE BY:
J.BUXELL
ARCH [TECTU RE LTD.
129 NOKTHSECONDSIREET, #101
MINNFAFCM IWNNEVrA 55401
(612) 338 - 3773
FAX (61 2) 338
Vacated Street and
Attachment 7
QZP 6� 2 9
15iD
25 1.,.; - 4- 7- f7
Attachment 8
Neighborhood "I"
The 38 home sites in area "I ". (See exhibit) are all on the west and north of our primary
spine drive.
V1 --e
Area "I" Statistics and PUD standards are as follows. / m Y9 -71epAl
Area: 567,506 Sq. Ft. or 13.03 Acres
33 Home sites
Lot Sizes:
Min Lot Area: 10,404 sq. ft.
Max Lot Area: 32,432 sq. ft.
Average Lot Area: 17,197 sq. ft.
Interior Lot Setbacks:
Mouse Front Yard: 25 feet minimum.
Porch Front Yard: 20 feet minimum.
Garage Side Yard: 5 feet minimum.
House Side Yard: 10 feet minimum.
Rear Yard: 30 feet minimum.
Rear Yard to Detached Garage or Accessory Building:
5 Feet minimum.
Corner Lot Setbacks:
House Street Side Sideyard: 15 feet minimum.
Garage Street Side Yard (with garage door facing street):
25 feet minimum.
Garage Street Side Yard (with garage door not facing street):
15 feet minimum.
Garage Limitations:
Detached or .Accessory Building: 720 sq. ft. maximum.
Front Yard Setback: 30 feet minimum.
Front Yard Setback if Garage door turned away from street:
20 feet minimum.
Neighborhoods designated "Ia"
5/25/99
The homesites with the "Ia" designation would have all the same standards as "I"
with the addition of allowing `Mother in Law' living spaces within each
home.
Said additional living space can not exceed 800 square feet.
The Mother in Law living space cannot be occupied by more than two persons.
There must be one enclosed garage space for this living space beyond the two
required for the base home.
The Mother in Law living space cannot be occupied by more than two persons.
Neighborhood "II"
The 12 home sites in Area "II" are expected to be the highest value in the development.
They are all significant in size and are oriented to preserve the natural wooded slopes in
this portion of the site. The road has been meandered to preserve many significant white
oaks in the area.
Area "II" Statistics and PUD standards are as follows.
Area: 304,980 Sq. Ft. or 7.00 Acres
12 Home sites
Lot Sizes:
Min Lot Area: 16,563 sq. ft.
Max Lot Area: 38,614 sq. ft.
Average Lot Area: 25,415 sq. ft.
min.
Interior Lot Setbacks:
House Front Yard: 30 feet minimum.
Porch Front Yard: 25 feet minimum.
Garage Side Yard: 10 feet minimum.
House Side Yard: 10 feet minimum.
Rear Yard: 40 Feet minimum.
Corner Lot Setbacks:
House Street Side Sideyard: 20 feet minimum.
Garage Street Side Yard (with gar. door facing street): 25 feet
Garage Street Side Yard (with gar. door not facing street):
20 feet minimum
Garage Limitations:
Detached or Accessory Building: 720 sq. ft. maximum.
Front Yard Setback: 35 feet minimum.
Front Yard Setback if Garage door turned away from street:
25 feet minimum.
5/25/99 27
Neighborhood "III"
The 26 home sites in area "III" are slightly smaller and more formal in character than
elsewhere in the development. They either face west and north across New Century
Boulevard., or are oriented to the three unique oblong shaped cul de sacs, which help
define the character of this part of the site.
Area "III" Statistics and PUD standards are as follows.
Area: 336,770 Sq. Ft. or 7.73 Acres
min.
5/25/99
30 Home sites
Lot Sizes:
Min Lot Area: 9,111 sq. ft.
Max Lot Area: 14,466 sq. ft.
Average Lot Area: 11,225 sq. ft.
Interior Lot Setbacks:
House Front Yard: 20 feet minimum.
Porch Front Yard: 15 feet minimum.
Garage Side Yard: 5 feet minimum.
House Side Yard: 5 feet minimum.
Rear Yard: 30 feet minimum.
Rear Yard to Detached Garage or Accessory Building: 5 feet min.
Side Yard to Detached Garage or Accessory Building: 5 feet min.
Side Yard to the primary structure on the Detached Garage or
Accessory Building side of the yard: 15 feet minimum.
Corner Lot Setbacks:
House Street Side Sideyard: 15 feet minimum.
Garage Street Side Yard (with garage door facing street): 25 feet
Garage Street Side Yard (with garage door not facing street):
15 feet minimum.
Garage Limitations:
Detached or Accessory Building: 720 sq. ft. maximum.
Front Yard Setback: 30 feet minimum.
Front Yard Setback if Garage door is turned away from street:
20 feet minimum.
Living Space above the Accessory building:
`Mother in Law' living spaces are permitted within each home or
above the accessory structure.
Said additional living space can not exceed 800 square feet.
Said living space cannot be occupied by more than two persons.
Said living space cannot be under separate ownership from the
primary residence.
There must be one enclosed garage space for this living space
beyond the two required for the base home.
28
Neighborhood "IV"
The four lots in area "IV" are proposed as duplex lots each served from the rear with a
shared access drive to the front of the lots. A common driveway will serve all four lots
from Century.
Area "IV" Statistics and PUD standards are as follows.
Area: 479,291 S q. Ft. or 11 Acres
4 Lots for 8 Homes
Lot Sizes:
Min Lot Area: 13,881 sq.ft.
Max Lot Area: 15,064 sq. ft.
Average Lot Area: 14,310 sq. ft.
Interior Lot Setbacks:
House Front Yard: 35 feet minimum.
Porch Front Yard: 30 feet minimum.
Garage Side Yard: 10 feet minimum.
House Side Yard: 1.5 feet minimum.
Rear Yard: Not Applicable
Neighborhood "V"
Area "V" is proposed as a townhouse site with thirty four through townhouses fronting
on the central spine and the Village Square and fifty back to back townhouses of which
one half are on grade and half are garage tuckunders. These are specifically designed to
P Y g
accommodate the 24 foot plus grade change down to the newly built pond and wetland.
Area "V" Statistics and PUD standards are as follows.
Area: 9.02 Acres
94 Townhouses
44 Through Townhouses
50 Back to back Townhouses
Interior Lot Setbacks:
Townhouse Front Yard to Public Street R.O.W.: 25 feet min.
Porch Front Yard: 20 feet minimum.
Side Yard to a Public Street R.O.W.within New Century: 25 ft. min.
Back to Back Town house Setback:
40 Feet minimum to any property line
Street setback to any property line: 20 feet minimum.
Parking setback to any property line: 20 feet minimum.
5/25/99 29
Proposed PUD Land Use Summary:
Gross Area: 54.67 Acres
Open Space 6.48 Ac
Village Green 1.03 Ac
Total 54.67 Ac 177 D.U. 3.24 D.U. per Acre
5/25/99 30
Net Area /Acres
# DU's
Density
13.03 Ac
33 D.U.
2.5 D.U. per Acre
7.00 Ac
12 D.U.
1.7 D.U. per Acre
"III"
7.73 ALI
30 D.U.
3.9 D.U. per Acre
"N°
131 Ac
8 D.U.
6.1 D.U. per Acre
"V"
9.02 Ac
94 D.U.
10.4 D.U. per Acre
R.O. W
9.07 Ac
Open Space 6.48 Ac
Village Green 1.03 Ac
Total 54.67 Ac 177 D.U. 3.24 D.U. per Acre
5/25/99 30
Attachment 9
0 75 150 300
NORTH
SCALE: 1 = 300'
CITY PARK
MY OPENSPACE
DEVELOPER:
Robert E. Engstrom
Robert Engstrom
Companies, #101
4801 W 81st Street,
Mpls, MN 55437
612 -893 -1001
A PLANNID U UT
DEVELOPMENT
FOR THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
IM�I
sa
>:
A8E
{ y An
E 3 ASE
13 M9
31
Planned Unit Development
Housing Area Designation Exhibit
� Planned Unit Development
rL�
ENGINEERING BY:
Glen Rehbein Company
8651 Naples Street N.E.
Blaine MN 55449
612- 784 -0657
Engineering:
William McCully
Surveying:
Tim Kitonen
PLANNING &
ARCHITECTURE BY:
J .
ARCH nCTU RE LTD.
129 NORM SECOND STREET, #101
MINNEAMS, MINNESOTA 55401
( 1-2) 338-3773 (612) 338-0040
Attachment 10
DEVELOPER:
0 75 rO0 300
NORTH
SCALE: 1" = 300'
-sue ;.•' '' J .'�.�� �/'"'� ' ` • �' 4 ' \
+ • ''''
1030 � r' �i�f " �/s r_..._ 4• '♦. - :. 6 �tY�
1030 !
1010
lose.
1040 �►0.: `s
CITY PARK
lose '•' "" �"'`
&
CITY OPENSPACE
4' MfOOD Clr►
0 11
'.`•,�.�
-wr ``• f f t .
1018
' t
1
3 r
0
0
Robert E. Engstrom
Robert Engstrom
Companies, #101
4801 W 81st Street,
Mpl s, MN 55437
612 -893 -1001
A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT
FOR THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
0 �
[j.]
IM
UM
v
z
ENGINEERING BY:
Glen Rehbein Company
8651 Naples Street N.E.
Blaine MN 55449
612 - 784-0657
Engineering:
William McCully
Surveying:
Tim Kitonen
PLANNING &
ARCHITECTURE BY:
J. BUXELL
ARCH ITEC TU KE LTD.
129 NOR M iSECONDSMEET, #101
MINNEAFCM MINN5CIA 55401
( 612) 338-3773 (612) 338040
Preserved Natural Openspace
and Landscape Feature Areas
f 32 Planned Unit Development
#w "
GNWNX Xq
DMLONNE W PDWON &
AM NW-03
IM
UM
v
z
ENGINEERING BY:
Glen Rehbein Company
8651 Naples Street N.E.
Blaine MN 55449
612 - 784-0657
Engineering:
William McCully
Surveying:
Tim Kitonen
PLANNING &
ARCHITECTURE BY:
J. BUXELL
ARCH ITEC TU KE LTD.
129 NOR M iSECONDSMEET, #101
MINNEAFCM MINN5CIA 55401
( 612) 338-3773 (612) 338040
Preserved Natural Openspace
and Landscape Feature Areas
f 32 Planned Unit Development
FAP
Wo
JOIN
M
fe - 4 g y
V-w
4
aw
7r r, ;Ipo %0 *
A
OIL
4%
W.A
brA
77 1�e r
-- "" �« �� �� VLM
—m
AQ
1010
AV- W
It
X
M,:
1 - 86
U-0. IL.A, ILA, ll�
S.W. 160.
,
lie
X
x a0cf,
ff's JM
ME
mrs ar
I KI
4
l000
or
14"
5r
too
- kc,
��1
n'�1
avelopment Plan I
0
FIN
AWA lot
NIP,
YVA s ue` /.
.� _ 1 W -
co
Ov It A
%I AK
%)
None
klM
=10
A# e,
A Oft',
'M
IS
� ���,� �� ��� f�: tea:
�����•��`� ` far f R
04� iM�G f 41k
AM
IA.
ol
Z.;rl# - - ou 0 4�
;�. � ,�' dam. O
.: ■
00f,
AV,
Mr.
lr?
Alk AM,
71
0 Z. =
10, lw
3w
0
: Ft lw
f
WE
1 : 1 f Off jv 0
71 BOB
,,,. ���� r�, ,�' 1:1 AF . , a p� -
ire n .. 4r
4
IN
BLOCK.
L
• OR
Iwo
-
4fpWT
leg.
4ft"
o'
AV
If
10
p 15%
e 40
Q, pr pw
13 a ICO33 43
o
V
rA -
110 '01 cc
io
:ww
F
�I
NEIV CENTVRT
Attachment 13
0 10 20 40
SCALE: 1" — 40'
PROPERTY LINE
HOUSE SIDE YARE
TYP. - LOT LAYOUT
36
OF CURB -TYP.
;E7BACK- TYP.
BUILDING PAD AREA
G GARAGE ELEV.
F - FINISHED FLR. ELEV.
B - BASEMENT ELEV.
W - BASEMENT WINDOW OPENING
WO WALK OUT
LO -LOOK OUT
RAMB- RAMBLER
SWO - SPLIT ENTRY WALK OUT
GE SOF YARD SETBACK
Typical Lot Exhibit
j Planned Unit Development
DEVELOPER:
Robert E. Engstrom
Robert Engstrom
Companies, #101
4801 W 81st Street,
Mpls, MN 55437
612 - 893 -1001
A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT
FOR THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
v
ENGINEERING BY:
Glen Rehbein Company
8651 Naples Street N.E.
Blaine MN 55449
612 -784 -0657
Engineering:
William McCully
Surveying:
Tim Kitonen
'PLANNING &
ARCHITECTURE BY:
J .BUXELL
ARCHr EC' &E LTD.
129 NOKTHSECONDSMEET, #101
MINNERFCM MINNESM 55401
( 612) 338-3773 (61 2) 338090
0
� o v
Attachment 14
0 16 w 60
scu.F: r = rya
DEVELOPER:
Robert E. Engstrom
Robert Engstrom
Companies, #101
4801 W :81st Street,
Mpls, MN 55437
612 -893 -1001
A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT
FOR THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
z::
T11w]
v
r�
Village Green Site Plan
.: 36 Planned Unit Development
ENGINEERING BY:
Glen Rehbein Company
8651 Naples Street N.E.
Blaine MN 55449
612 - 784 -0657
Engineering:
William McCully
Surveying:
Tim Kitonen
PLANNING &
ARCHITECTURE BY:
J.BLIXELL
ARCHrFEC7U&E LTD.
129 NORIH SECOND SIFJk7, #101
MINNEAFMJ MINNESOTA 55901
(6 12) 338 - 3773
FAX {61 2) 338-0040
Attachment 15
I N T E R
MEMO
O F F I C E
To: Mr. Michael McGuire
From: Donald Winger ; �
Subject: STREET NAMES FOR THE NEW CENTURY DEVELOPMENT
Date:. June 22, 1999
I have been asked to review the street names for the New Century Development. The Police
Department will not oppose the street names in the original proposal.
Please disregard previous memos on this subject.
Thank you.
CC:
Ms. Coleman
37
Attachment 16
TO: Melinda Cole, qi
FROM: Bruce K. Ande
DATE: April 20, 1999
MEMORANDUM
A Co m uni ty Development
7 arks n Recreation
SUBJECT: New Century Planned Unit Development Housing Project
INTRODUCTION
The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission and city staff reviewed the proposed
development entitled New Century - Robert E. Engstrom at their regular meeting on April 19
1999. The Parks and Recreation Commission traditionally does not review park dedication
fees or specific residential plats. Staff apprised the Commission of this issue due to the
request from the developer that the park dedication fees be waived based on the proposed
Village Green concept.
BACKGROUND
The city currently receives park dedication monies based on the number of residential units
which is paid at the time a building permit is issued. I have attached a. copy of the current park
dedication rates which would be in effect for the New Century planned unit development.
Precedent in the city is that no credit has been provided for private onsite recreation amenities
installed by the developer. The city has requested trail connections to be provided by the
developer to existing or proposed trail systems and numerous joint projects have been done
between the city and the developer to enhance the salability of a proposed plat or project.
Upon a detailed review of the New Century planned unit development, specifically the
proposed Village Green, it is the position of staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission
that no park credit be provided to the developer. This position is based on the following:
1. The city has made a conscious effort to not develop mini parks due to the high level of
maintenance and small demographic area that they serve.
2. The development proposal states that the Village Green will be completed during the initial
stage of construction and would be owned and maintained by the New Century community
association. The ownership issue states clearly that it would be a private facility and
provide minimal public benefit.
3. The New Century PUD is somewhat isolated from other housing projects and in effect, an
autonomous plat or subdivision.
4. The city recently acquired a major neighborhood park preserve and park entitled Apple
Wood Park located to the west which is designed to serve this residential neighborhood. It
should be noted that Apple Wood Park and neighborhood park preserve will be connected
through an off -road trail system.
W
5. The Village Green features and landscaping are extremely labor and maintenance
intensive and the city would not be able to maintain the facilities. I recognize that it is not
the intent of the developer for the city to become involved in the maintenance or
operations of the facility, but should the city enter into a park credit, the city would request
ownership which may ultimately defer maintenance back to the city.
In conclusion, the Parks and Recreation Commission and staff are extremely impressed with
the New Century planned unit development project and the proposed Village Green concept.
We believe that its a very exciting and positive amenity to our community and that the Village
Green will provide wonderful recreational and social opportunities. The city strongly believes
that the Village Green will solely benefit the townhouse and single family residents within the
planned unit development and provide minimal public benefit. Consequently, no park credit
should be provided for this project.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend that the enclosed P.A.C. fee
schedule be utilized to establish the final park dedication rate for the New Century project
which would be due at the time the building permit is issued.
Should you have any questions, please contact me directly at 4573.
W\newcent. mem
Enclosure
39
000����� � Attachment 17
22
- 1 rO /!S �U
y
- �ou�eve� /Iv ore �'las C�o•���ea� �
. CO �,�e 0/7a//7 57Y 4;o1J �o� � v
rolg &4 ll)-e ��a► -�� cam' �ur
s ED �/ar7 M-ap,
dye, / oc,�
y
7 .�� �c� v�rc� �an o� ar�d
�
/?a v� CYe��
/ 9
c� here a:� of A o t v �%� l.� a �er� co i GL jr 1.7 c3 r?
44y ��o f o�e�� • G1�v Y�o� C',v M n�
&u der" 3o eoe�' os7
t Z o low exts� mow.
lAev-e Avi4v c/acz a6
/ hu� / s %� c�.� _ /�cr.�h ���i�wao�
/"/ 0l7 / F le , OcG
ll
- Attachment 1.;B:.:
4`7
ITT �'�•
1 Ok h f
VIED
APR 2 19 99
t e o r
rt
�� � � .? � s � + wfs r• � rte. � w� w: .s. w aa..0 w .., � �' �.
t
4L
4 :c�r��� 1� aw.
i
.� tie �e _. •
r
. f
Attachment 19
NEIGHBORHOOD SIGN -UP SHEET
Opposition to the proposal presented by the Robert Engstrom
Company. In his proposal he is asking for zoning changes from
the present R -1 (Single family dwelling) to RH (high density JUN - $ 19% �
townhomes ). I built in this area and many of you did because of
its single family dwelling. I am strongly opposed to any high ,.. _ go am 4" _..
density zoning and rental units. I'm asking for your signature to
show the City of Maplewood that we do not want the propose zone
changes. Together we can stop it!
Thank you for your kind consideration.
Neighbor
Name Address Si nature
0
Phone #
- 7 C
� 1
.**1 ��21
42
NEIGHBORHOOD SIGN -UP SHEET
Opposition to the proposal presented by the Robert Engstrom � JUN — 81999
Company. In his proposal he is asking for zoning changes from �
the present R -1 (Single family dwelling) to RH (high density
townhomes ). I built in this area and many of you did because of
its single family dwelling. I am strongly opposed to any high
density zoning and rental units. I'm asking for your signature to
show the City of Maplewood that we not want the propose zone
.changes. Together we can stop it'
Thank you for your kind consideration.
Neighbor
Name
Address
Signature
Phone #
'
735 307
7.71 S�Y/
73 / —oYJ�
7/Y-22i6
2 ;3 i -ao 5 e(
-a� 33
LV2.
f Tq 7
:Z
q007 P- 1 5 - �
7�- 7 R-ve,
43
Attachment 20
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Robert Engstrom proposed changes to the city's land use plan from R -1 (single
dwellings) and OS (open space) to R -1 (single dwellings), to OS (open space) and R -3H (residential high
density).
WHEREAS, this change applies to property for the New Century PUD north of Highwood Avenue and
west of Century Avenue in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the applicant also requested a change to the land use plan to drop the planned minor
collector street between the east end of Schaller Drive and Century Avenue.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. O.n June 7, 1999, the planning commission held public hearing. The city staff published a
hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property Owners.
The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written
statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council not approve the plan
amendment.
2. On June 28, 1999, the City council discussed the proposed land use plan change. They
considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
3. On July 12, 1999, the city council again considered the proposed land use plan changes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described change
for the following reasons:
1. The development would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive
plan.
2. This town house site in the development is proper for and consistent with the city's policies
for high- density residential use. This includes:
a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing and proposed low density
residential and commercial land uses.
b. It is on a collector street and is near an arterial street, parks and Open space.
3. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because:
a. The proposed on -site pond and large setback from the street will separate the town
houses from nearby homes.
b. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values.
C. There would be no traffic from this development on existing local residential streets.
4. The city nor the developer plan to build the proposed collector street between the east end of
Schaller Drive and Century Avenue because the existing wetlands and trees would make it
difficult to build a street in this area.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 9 1999.
44
Attachment 21
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, representing the Robert Engstrom Companies, applied for a
conditional use permit (CUP) for the New Century residential planned unit development (PUD).
WHEREAS, this change applies to undeveloped property for the New Century PUD north of Highwood
Avenue and west of Century Avenue in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
(PINS 13- 28 -22 -11 -0008, 0015, 0014 0013 and 0022,13-28-22-14-0018, 0019, 0020 and 0021.)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 7, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
permit.
2. On June 28, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone
at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
3. On July 12, 1999, the city council again considered this request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional
use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity
with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of Operation
that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any
person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air
pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or
other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
45
Approval is subject to the following conditions:.
1. All construction shall follow the plans date- stamped March 29, 1999 and the revised
preliminary plat and grading plans dated May 24, 1999, except where the city requires
changes. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval
or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall
include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree and driveway and parking lot plans.
4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer
shall give the city an easement for this pond and shall be responsible for getting any needed
off -site pond and drainage easements.
5. The developer or contractor shall:
a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements
and meet all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs
shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation
cutting, filling or dumping.
d. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
e. Remove any debris, junk or fill from the wetlands and site.
6.* The developer shall give the city wetland easements over the wetlands. The easements
shall cover the wetlands and any land within 50 feet surrounding a wetland These
easements shall prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within twenty feet
of the wetland or within the wetland itself. The purpose of this easement is to protect the
water quality of the wetlands from fertilizer and to protect the wetland habitat from
encroachment.
7. The owners of the single dwellings in the PUD may have one mother -in -law (accessory)
apartment with their property. Such accessory units shall be subject to the following:
a. Such accessory units may be occupied by one or two persons.
b. The accessory units shall not be more than 800 square feet.
c. The city will not allow separate or different ownership for tax or identification purposes of
the accessory unit from the primary residence.
8. The approved setbacks for the principal structures in the New Century PUD shall be:
1. Front yard setback: minimum - 20 feet, maximum - 50 feet
2. Front yard setback (side street): minimum -15 feet, maximum - 30 feet
46
I. Rear yard setback: minimum - 30 feet, maximum - none
4. Side yard setback: as the zoning code requires
9. This approval does not include final design approval for the duplexes, townhomes or for the
village green. The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping and site plans for these
to the community design review board (CDRB) for approval by the CDRB.
10. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1999.
EA VA
Attachment 22
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, representing the Robert Engstrom Companies, applied for the
vacation of the following described street right -of -ways:
1. The south 30 feet of the NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey
County, Minnesota, except the east 288.17 feet. (Tim Avenue)
2. The east and north 30 feet of the east 343.60 feet of the east two - thirds of the west 3/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
3. Phylis Avenue in A. BERG ADDITION.
4. That part of Mayhill Road in A. BERG ADDITION and that part of Mayhill Road lying between
Tim Avenue and the north right -of -way line of Highwood Avenue.
5. The south 60 feet of the north 190 feet of the west third of the west three- quarters of the SE 1/4
of the NE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
All in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22 in Ramsey County.
WHEREAS, the history of these vacations is as follows:
1. On June 7, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve these
street vacations.
2. On June 28, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners. The Council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
3. On July 12, 1999, the city council again considered this request.
WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following
abutting properties:
1. Lots 1, 7, and Lots 8 -14, A. BERG ADDITION.
2. Except the North 657 feet and Except the South 243 feet of the North 900 feet of the east 240
feet and except the east 288.17 feet of the part South of the North 900 feet, the East '/ of the
NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 (Subject to Road) in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22 (PIN 13- 28 -22-
11 -0013)
3. The SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 (Subject to Road) in Section 13, Township 28, Range
22 (PIN 13- 28 -22 -11 -0014)
4. Subject to Roads; the East 343.6 feet of the West 3/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13,
Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0019)
5. Except the South 657 feet; The West 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13, Township
28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0020)
48
All in Section 13, Township.28, Range 22, Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described vacation
since it is in the public interest based on the following reasons:
1. The adjacent properties have adequate street access.
2. These right -of -ways are not needed for the public purpose of street construction.
3. The developer will be dedicating new public street right -of -ways with the plat.
4. Mayhill Road and Phylis Avenue are too narrow for street construction.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1999.
49
1.
..
Attachment 23
EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, representing Robert Engstrom Companies, applied for the vacation
of the following- described easements:
1. The north 100 feet of the east two- thirds of the west three - quarters of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of
Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, except the east 343.60 feet.
2. That part of the West 1/3 of the West 3/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 29,
Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4; thence North 00 degrees 36
minutes 28 seconds East, on an assumed bearing along the West line of said SE 1/4, a distance
of 452.04 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing North 00
degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 597.82 feet thence East a distance of 70.00
feet; thence South 09 degrees 30 minutes East a distance of 61.00 feet; thence East a distance of
150.00 feet; thence South 33 degrees 40 minutes East a distance of 54.00 feet; thence South a
distance of 130.00 feet; thence South 67 degrees 20 minutes West a distance of 123.73 feet; thence
South a distance of 110.00 feet; thence South 36 degrees 10 minutes West a distance of 105.36
feet; thence South 119.93 feet; thence West 90 feet to the point of beginning.
All lying north of Highwood Avenue and west of Century Avenue in Section 13, Township 28, Range
22, Maplewood, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. On June 7, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve these
vacations.
2. On June 28, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The council gave everyone
at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered
reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
3. On July 12, 1999, the city council again considered this request.
WHEREAS, after the city approves these vacations, public interest in the property will go to the following
abutting properties:
1. Subject to roads and easements and except the East 343.6 feet; the East 2/3 of the West 3/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
(PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0018)
2. Except the South 657 feet; The West 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13, Township 28,
Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0020)
3. The South 657 feet of the West 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 (Subject to road) of Section 13,
Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0021)
All in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota
50
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above . described vacations
for the following reasons:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The city and the adjacent property owners have no plans to build a street or utilities in these
locations.
3. The adjacent properties have access to public streets and utilities.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 9 1999.
51
Attachment 24
SUBSTANDARD CUL -DE -SAC CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, of the Robert Engstrom Companies, requested a variation from
the city code.
WHEREAS, this code variation applies to the existing cul -de -sac at the east end of Schaller Drive
at the west property line for the proposed New Century PUD that is north of Highwood Avenue and west
of Century Avenue.
WHEREAS, Section 30 -8 (b)(3) of the Maplewood City Code requires that cul -de -sacs have a right -
of -way' diameter of 120 feet and a pavement. diameter of 94 feet.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to change a temporary cul -de -sac into a permanent cul -de-
sac with a right -of -way diameter of 100 feet and a reduced street pavement diameter.
WHEREAS, this requires a variation for the right -of -way diameter of 20 feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows:
The Maplewood Planning Commission reviewed this request on June 7, 1999. The planning
commission recommended that the council approve the proposed code variation.
The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 28, 1999. City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and to present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations from the city staff.
The Maplewood City Council again considered this request on July 12, 1999.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the above -
described variation subject to the city engineer approving the construction plans.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 9 1999.
52
Attachment 25
STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY WIDTH CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, of the Robert Engstrom Companies, requested a variation from
the city code.
WHEREAS, this code variation applies to the New Century PUD that is north of Highwood Avenue
and west of Century Avenue.
WHEREAS, the legal description for this property is:
The south 1 /2 of the north 1/ of the west 1 /2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Sec. 13, T.28,
R.22, Ramsey County, MN. and:
The south 1 /2 of the west 1 /2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13. And:
That part of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13 described as commencing at the northeast corner
of said N.E. 1/4; thence south along the east Tine thereof 657 feet to the point of beginning; thence
westerly 110 feet; thence southerly 70 feet; thence westerly 80 feet; thence southerly 20 feet; thence
westerly 50 feet; thence southerly 60 feet; thence easterly 240 feet more or less, to the east line of
said N.E. 1/4 thence north along the east line thereof 150 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to
Century Ave. and:
Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 1, A. Berg Addition. And:
The south 1 /2 of the east 1 / of the N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4: of said Sec. 13, except that part
described as follows: commencing at the northeast corner of said N.E. 1/4; thence south along the
east line thereof 807 feet to the point of beginning: thence westerly parallel to the north line of said
N.E. 1./4 240 feet; thence southerly parallel to the east line of said N.E. 1/4 93 feet; thence westerly
parallel to said north line 48.17 feet; thence southerly parallel to said east line of 415.95 more or less
to the south line of said N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4; thence east along the south Fine thereof to the
southeast corner of said N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4; thence north to the point of beginning. Subject to
Century Avenue and:
The west 3/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13, T. 28, R. 22, Ramsey Co. M N.,
subject to roads and easements. And:
All that part of the east 1 /2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4, Sec. 13, T. 28 R. 22, described
as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Sec. 13, distant 657 feet south of the N.E.
Cor. of said Sec. 13, thence West and parallel with the North Fine of said Sec. 13 110 feet, thence
South and parallel with the East line of said Sec. 13, a distance of 70 feet; thence West 80 feet, to
the point of beginning to the land to be described; thence South and parallel to said east line 20 feet,
thence West 50 feet, thence North 20 feet; thence easterly to the point of beginning. And:
The south 249 feet of the west 419 feet of the N 1 /2 of the E 1 /2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4
of said Sec. 13.
All in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PINS 13- 28- 22 -11-
0008, 0015, 0014 0013 and 0022 0019, 0020 and 0021.)
53
WHEREAS,. Section 29 -53 -of the Maplewood City Code requires. that local residential streets have
60 feet of right -of -way.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing several local streets in the PUD with 50- foot -wide right -of-
ways and reduced street pavement widths.
WHEREAS, this requires a variation of ten feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows:
The Maplewood Planning Commission reviewed this request on June 7, 1999. The planning
commission recommended that the council approve the proposed code variation.
The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 28, 1999. City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and to present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations from the city staff.
The Maplewood City Council considered this request again on July 12, 1999.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the above -
described variation subject to the city engineer approving the construction plans.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 2 1999.
54
Attachment 26
STREET PAVEMENT WIDTH CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom of the Robert Engstrom Companies requested a variation from the
city code.
WHEREAS, this code variation applies to the New Century PUD that is north of Highwood Avenue,
and west of Century Avenue.
WHEREAS, the legal description for this property is:
The south '/2 of the north '/ of the west '/ of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Sec. 13, T.28,
R.22, Ramsey County, MN. and:
The south 1 /2 of the west'/ of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13. And:
That part of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13 described as commencing at the northeast corner
of said N.E. 1/4; thence south along the east Fine thereof 657 feet to the point of beginning; thence
westerly 110 feet; thence southerly 70 feet; thence westerly 80 feet; thence southerly 20 feet; thence
westerly 50 feet; thence southerly 60 feet; thence easterly 240 feet more .or less, to the east line of
said N.E. 1/4 thence north along the east line thereof 150 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to
Century Ave. and:
Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 1, A. Berg Addition. And:
The south '/ of the east Y of the N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4: of said Sec. 13, except that part
described_ as follows: commencing at the northeast corner of said N. E. 1/4; thence south along the
east line thereof 807 feet to the point of beginning: thence westerly parallel to the north line of said
N.E. 1/4 240 feet; thence southerly parallel to the east line of said N.E. 1/4 93 feet; thence westerly
parallel to said north line 48.17 feet; thence southerly parallel to said east line of 415.95 more or less
to the south line of said N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4; thence east along the south line thereof to the
southeast corner of said N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4; thence north to the point of beginning. Subject to
Century Avenue. and:
The west 3/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13, T. 28, R. 22, Ramsey Co. MN.,
subject to roads and easements. And:
All that part of the east '/2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4, Sec. 13, T. 28, R. 22, described
as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Sec. 13, distant 657 feet south of the N.E.
Cor. of said Sec. 13, thence West and parallel with the North line of said Sec. 13, 110 feet, thence
South and parallel with the East line of said Sec. 13, a distance of 70 feet; thence West 80 feet, to
the point of beginning to the land to be described; thence South and parallel to said east line 20 feet,
thence West 50 feet, thence North 20 feet; thence easterly to the point of beginning. And:
The south 249 feet of the west 419 feet of the N Y2 of the E '/2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4
of said Sec. 13.
All in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PINS 13- 28- 22 -11-
0008, 0015, 0014, 0013 and 0022, 13- 28- 22- 14- 0018, 0019, 0020 and 0021.)
55
WHEREAS, Section 29- 52(a)(9) of the Maplewood City Code requires that local residential streets
shall be 32 feet in width, measured. between faces of curbs.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 28- foot -wide, 24- foot -wide and 20- foot -wide streets with no
parking on one side and no parking on both sides.
WHEREAS, this requires a variation of four feet, eight feet and twelve feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows:
The Maplewood Planning Commission reviewed this request on June 7, 1999. The planning
commission recommended that the council approve the proposed code variation.
The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 28, 1999. City staff published .a notice
in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and to present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations from the city staff.
The Maplewood City Council again considered this request on July 12, 1999.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the above -
described variation subject to no parking on one side of the 28- foot -wide streets, no parking on the
streets less than 28 feet wide and the developer paying the city for the cost of no- parking signs.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1999.
56
Attachment 27
NO PARKING RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Maplewood has approved a residential PUD and preliminary plat known as New
Century.
WHEREAS, the developer wants to have reduced street right -of -way widths and reduced street
pavement widths in this development.
WHEREAS, the city has approved reduced street right -of -way widths and reduced street pavement
widths in the development, subject to on- street parking restrictions.
WHEREAS, Section 29 -52(b) of the city code allows variations from the city code standards if they
do not affect the general purpose of the city code.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that Maplewood prohibits the parking of motor
vehicles on both sides of all public streets less than 28 feet wide and prohibits parking on one side of the
public streets that are 28 feet to 32 feet wide in the New Century PUD north of Highwood Avenue and
west of Century Avenue in Section 13- 28 -22.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 9 1999.
57
t1*
GEORGE ROSSBACK - MAYOR
KEVIN KITTRIDGE - COUNCIL
. DALE CARLSON - COUNCIL ERV CARLSON
SHERRY ALLENSPACK - COUNCIL 2599 SOUTHCREST AVENUE
MARV KOPPEN - COUNCIL MAPLEWOOD, MN 55119
DEAR MR. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS,
I HAVE MANY CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROPOSED NEW CENTURY DEVELOPMENT. WHEN I
ATTENDED THE OPEN DISCUSSION MEETING, I WAS MAINLY CONCERNED WITH THE TRAFFIC
INCREASE THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BRING. UPON FURTHER THOUGHT AND DISCUSSIONS I
REALIZED THERE ARE OTHER ITEMS WHICH NEED TO BE EXAMINED.
WITH THE PROPOSED 172 UNITS, AT A MINIMUM OF TWO CARS PER UNIT, THE INCREASED
POPULATION WILL BRING AN ADDED 344 MORE VEHICLES INTO THE AREA FROM THE NEW
CENTURY DEVELOPMENT. THIS NUMBER WILL INCREASE WITH CHILDREN REACHING DRIVING
AGE. A MINIMUM OF ONE TRIP PER DAY WILL BRING 700 MORE VEHICLE OCCURENCES ONTO
THE STREETS. AN AVERAGE OF THREE TRIPS PER DAY WOULD ALMOST DOUBLE THE CURRENT
TRAFFIC ON CENTURY AND HIGHWOOD. THIS TRAFFIC, ADDED TO ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC FROM
AMBER HILLS AND BETH HEIGHTS, WILL MAKE OUR STREETS HEAVILY USED. ALSO IN THE
NEAR FUTURE THE EXISTING HOMES WILL BE ADDING VEHICLES TO THE TRAFFIC WHEN THE
CHILDREN REACH DRIVING AGE. A CENSUS SHOULD BE TAKEN TO COUNT THE FUTURE DRIVING
POPULATION. BY MY ESTIMATES FROM CHILDREN INVOLVED IN TEAM SPORTS, THIS POPULATION
WILL BE VERY SIGNIFICANT IN THE NEAR FUTURE,
IF THE 800 SQUARE FOOT APARTMENT IS ALLOWED ON THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, THE 76
COUNT CAN DOUBLE TO 152 FAMILIES. ADD THIS TO 16 FAMILIES IN THE 8 TWIN -HOMES AND
96 TOWN HOMES, THE 172 FAMILYS CAN INCREASE TO 252 FAMILIES. THE FACT THAT THE
"MOTHER -IN -LAW" APARTMENTS WILL ONLY BE USED FOR INLAWS CAN BE REGULATED BY
ORDINANCE BUT IS ALWAYS SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN THE FUTURE. MY FAMILY'S. PREVIOUS
HOME WAS 650 SQUARE FEET. A FAMILY OF FOUR CAN EASILY LIVE IN 800 SQUARE FEET.
THESE UNITS WILL EVENTUALLY BE USED AS RENTAL UNITS.
IN SOUTH MAPLEWOOD WE HAVE A VERY LARGE WILDLIFE POPULATION. THESE ANIMALS ARE
BEING FORCED INTO AN EVER DECREASING HABITAT. IF THIS TREND IS ALLOWED TO CONTINUE,
THERE WILL BE NO AREA LEFT FOR THEM AND THEY WILL DISAPPEAR. WHEN I BUILT MY HOME
SIX YEARS AGO, THE DEER WOULD ROAM IN GROUPS OF TWO OR THREE. NOW IT IS VERY COMMON
TO SEE PACKS OF TEN OR MORE. THE FOX, RACOON, AND OTHER ANIMALS CAN BE SEEN
ON A REGULAR BASIS. THIS IS DUE TO THE SHRINKING HABITAT. THE NEXT STEP IN THE
PROCESS IS THE DISAPPEARENCE OF THESE ANIMALS. THIS IS A VERY SAD CONSEQUENCE TO
PAY.
VERY IMPORTANTLY, THIS DEVELOPMENT IS GIVING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO MAPLEWOOD. I
WOULD LIKE TO SEE A COMBINATION OPEN AREA /PLAYGROUND SIMILAR TO PLEASANTVIEW PARK.
THE "VILLAGE GREEN" AREA IS NOT INTENDED TO BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A
BASEBALL /SOCCER FIELD, SKATING RING, TENNIS AND BASKETBALL COURTS, ETC. WITH
172 TO 252 FAMILIES IN THIS AREA, WHERE ARE THE CHILDREN GOING TO GO? WITH 20 FOOT
WIDE STREETS WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO PLAY? A YES VOTE WILL GIVE MANY CONCESSIONS
TO THE DEVELOPER AND HE IS GIVING NOTHING IN RETURN. THE CONCESSION GIVING THE
DEVELOPER REDUCED.SETBACK OPTIONS CAN PUT HOMES A FEW FEET FROM THE STREET
GIVING THE AREA AN INNER CITY FEELING THAT IS VERY UNDESIREABLE IN AREAS OF
CHILD SAFETY AND ASTHETICS. NARROW STREETS WITH LIMITED OR NO PARKING WILL
ALSO LEAD TO UNSAFE CONDITIONS FOR CHILDREN AND ADULT PEDESTRIANS. THE WAIVING
OF THE PARK ACCESS CHARGES IS AN UNFARE CONCESSION IN THAT THESE PEOPLE WILL
BE USING THE SAME PARKS AS OTHER RESIDENTS OF THE AREA.
Page 1
MOST IMPORTANT IS THE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT EXPLOSION OUR CURRENT SCHOOL SYSTEM WILL
BE FORCED TO ENDURE. AFTER TALKING WITH JUDY KERNTOP AT THE DISTRICT OFFICE,
SHARON SANDBERG, CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL, THIS DEVELOPMENT (172
MINIMUM AND POSSIBLE 252 FAMILIES), ALONG WITH AMBER HILLS (150 HOMES), HALLER'S
WOODS (38 HOMES), BETH HEIGHTS (24 HOMES), AND THE EXISTING POPULATION WILL
BRING THE CAPACITY OF CARVER, MAPLEWOOD MIDDLE, AND TARTAN HIGH SCHOOLS BEYOND
THEIR LIMITS. THE EDUCATION OF OUR CHILDREN WILL SUFFER AND NEW FACILITIES
WILL NEED TO BE FOUND OR BUILT.
BECAUSE OF THE INCREASED POPULATION SOCIAL SERVICES WILL NEED TO BE INCREASED.
POLICE, FIRE, SCHOOL BUSSING, ROAD MAINTENENCE, UTILITIES, ETC. WILL ALL NEED
INCREASED FINANCING. THE ONLY PLACE THAT MONEY COMES FROM IS OUR POCKET. A
$200,000 HOME PAYS APPROXIMATLY $4,000, $250, 000 HOME $6,500, AND THE COST
ESCALATES. ALL OUR PROPERTY VALUES ARE GREATLY INCREASING YEARLY. IF A HOME IS
VALUED AT $150,000 NOW, IT WILL SOON BE OVER $200.000. WITH THE INCREASING
NEED FOR SERVICES AND EDUCATION FACILITIES, THE PREVIOUSLY STATED TAXES WILL
RISE SIGNIFICANTLY.
I PROPOSE A TEN YEAR MORITORIUM ON ALL NEW DEVELOPEMENTS SO AS A COMMUNITY WE CAN
TAKE A BREATH AND SEE WHERE WE ARE AT IN THE AREAS OF EDUCATION, TRAFFIC AND
OVER CROWDING. A MORITORIUM WOULD ALLOW OUR NEW AREAS TO MATURE AND NOT FEEL
SUCH A STRESSED ENVIRONMENT.
ANOTHER OPTION WOULD BE FOR THE TO PROPOSE ANOTHER "OPEN SPACE FUND"
AND PURCHASE THE LAND AS OPEN /PARK SPACE SIMILAR TO THE BATTLE CREEK PARK
BETWEEN UPPER AND LOWER AFTON, BORDERED BY McKNI'GHT AND CARVER SCHOOL.
YOUR DECISION. WILL BE THE DIFFERENCE OF A GOOD EDUCATION FOR OUR CHILDREN, A
PLACE WHERE WILDLIFE CAN THRIVE, AND A COMFORTABLE PLACE -TO ENJOY LIFE. PLEASE
GIVE YOUR DECISION A GREAT DEAL OF THOUGHT BEFORE YOU ENDORSE CONSTRUCTION. A
TEN YEAR MORITORIUM, OR BETTER, A BAN ON ALL NEW DEVELOPEMENTS, WILL PROTECT
ALL MAPLEWOOD RESIDENTS. APPLE VALLEY, ROSEMONT, MONTOMEDI, AND EGAN HAVE
EITHER LIMITED OR HALTED ALL NEW DEVELOPEMENTS DUE TO OVER CROWDING AND OVERLY
RAPID GROWTH. PLEASE FOLLOW THEIR EXAMPLE AND STOP ANY NEW DEVELOPMENT IN
MAPLEWOOD. LOOK TEN OR TWENTY YEARS AHEAD AND ENVISION THE STATE OF OUR
COMMUNITY AND THE ILL EFFECTS ADDED CONSTRUCTION WILL BRING. PLEASE VOTE NO
TO ALL NEW DEVELOPEMENTS SO THIS AND THE NEXT GENERATION OF MAPLEWOOD RESIDENTS
CAN LIVE A QUALITY LIFE.
SINCERELY,
ERV CARLSON
(651)739 -8144
Page 2
• t' fin ;, � :. �' ��1s`�. ,� ��fy, +II'�'..s
pk .�
x.-A
L
-� ~• � �; } P �,t�� aSnµ
Col
� vim � a% .r, � �r�' ^ �a#`^' �,�'
y � may' �,.' -:r• •� „` " �� w � ,,} , .. �,: w ,,.,�
t
4 �
6% ^ ,� sp•.�J ��� �T1a 2 4 .P., �i � r.'Y .si 4'�*, Ol�..� ..�=' __. �>
��,.,: >:. ���+ ��y ��r a G' T . "'•�i. , fi r: { � ��� �iaY t� �T < . .1 vn �° 's r� ,
THE UNDERSIGNED ENDORSE A "NO" VOTE ON GIVING CONCESSIONS FOR THE NEW CENTURY
DEVELOPEMENT PROPOSED BY DEVELOPER MR. ROBERT ENGSTROM.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
5 --- ------------------------------------------------- 76 ------------
5 6
CID ObL 47D
I m- L74 ki Mel aw, 0-I � m IWA
.4v :;pr C--"
.57 -73
AL,
id
Y P4
J'ALVA
ok
Mir bil
ILI
yy�
_
.g � g)3 CeoiTwv fi�C �i 73/ - 1)36
LO 4oe
Pa 3
THE UNDERSIGNED ENDORSE A "NO" VOTE ON GIVING CONCESSIONS FOR THE NEW CENTURY
DEVELOPEMENT PROPOSED BY DEVELOPER MR. ROBERT ENGSTROM.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
= —. A - - - -- — — --,&------------ - - - - -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
rrl;
I %.-
206 Soo"
�jo -BL Jf Co
0-1 • A Avoll$ 1 00% — — — - p qft p
Owl
l3zC
I Pa 3
THE UNDERSIGNED ENDORSE A "NO" VOTE ON GIVING CONCESSIONS FOR THE NEW CENTURY
DEVELOPEMENT PROPOSED BY DEVELOPER MR. ROBERT ENGSTROM.
NAME - ADDRESS PHONE
�.� d/ a -- ;:,:T --Z- 7,7.,, - --R- -- - 4 7 ------------------------- 7 -------- ---------- - - - - --
om
s'/ '73d iSlO
Sl- X38 7 2 SZ
7
Pa 3
THE UNDERSIGNED ENDORSE A "NO" VOTE ON GIVING CONCESSIONS FOR THE NEW CENTURY
DEVEL0PEMENT PROPOSED BY DEVELOPER MR. ROBERT ENGSTROM. �
NAME ADDRESS PHONE.
zc (c, So L-1 acc;584
"tr 7)�
SaSGh i „ a3 wood
� 31 - 3Q7'l
THE UNDERSIGNED ENDORSE A
"NO" VOTE ON GIVING CONCESSIONS
FOR THE NEW CENTURY
DEVELOPEMENT
PROPOSED BY DEVELOPER MR. ROBERT ENGSTROM.
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
-069 - - - - - -
05p
- - - - - - - - - - -
- -- - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -
look
Aol
A) .3 63
06
13
�?•�395
NO- f o- A � lw
i or f C.- f - f
Pa 3
THE UNDERSIGNED ENDORSE A "NO" VOTE ON GIVING CONCESSIONS FOR THE NEW CENTURY
DEVELOPEMENT PROPOSED BY DEVELOPER MR. ROBERT ENGSTROM.
NAME
ADDRESS PHONE
-------------------------------------- t %`7 )
ff
i'' ' le"WALIN
Page 3
r
F.
THE UNDERSIGNED ENDORSE A "NO" VOTE ON GIVING CONCESSIONS FOR THE NEW CENTURY
DEVELOPEMENT PROPOSED BY DEVELOPER MR. ROBERT ENGSTROM.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
/(�/ 2 53/ 5i..fLc��s✓' �9u-c 73S-GZy$
C S oti 7S
�s 7g 38'37
n Page 3
ll
� -.-I A — a leN —
-7 3 �,,> 6& C.,
735 6 114
" 3 5; ��, 5z
Page 3
THE UNDERSIGNED ENDORSE A "NO" VOTE ON GIVING CONCESSIONS FOR THE NEW CENTURY
DEVELOPEMENT PROPOSED BY DEVELOPER MR. ROBERT ENGSTROM.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
i
THE UNDERSIGNED ENDORSE A "NO" VOTE ON GIVING CONCESSIONS FOR THE NEW CENTURY
DEVELOPEMENT PROPOSED BY DEVELOPER MR. ROBERT ENGSTROM.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
c�
7 3D 0 7
Page 3
3
AGENDA ITEM K
AGENDA REPORT Action by Coxneii4
Endorse d!_,,.., .,_,,. ,,,
TO: City Manager Modified....,.,,..
Pe j ected.,,...�...
FROM: Assistant City Engineer ineer bate
SUBJECT: Approve budget for Project 99 -13, Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets
DATE: July 2, 1999
With the cancellation of the Gladstone north neighborhood street project, staff is
prepared to add a project to the list street improvement projects for the year 2000
construction season.
The Bartelmy Acres neighborhood, (Bartelmy Lane, Mary Street & Sterling Street -
North of Stillwater Rd.), is listed in the CIP for the year 2001. Staff has also received
some inquiries from the neighborhood about a potential street project.
Staff is prepared to move the Bartelmy Acres project up in the CIP to next year and
begin meeting with the neighborhood this month. Some preliminary engineering work
would be required as part of the project development. If there is neighborhood support
for a project, that information will be utilized as part of the feasibility study.
Anot -to- exceed budget for project development for the Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood
Street Improvement would be $5000.
It is recommended that the city council direct staff to begin project development
for the Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood and approve the recommended not -to-
exceed budget of $5000.00.
CIVIC
jC
Attachments
John Henn A�
GATEW,q y CiMal (N. St. P.)
HARRIS AVE. I. MARYJOE LN.
ROSEWOOD AVE. N 2. TIERNEY AV.
3. MEADOW DR.
ROSEWO D 4. RIPLEY AV.
AVE. S. PJ NURSING HOME A D NORTH ST. PAU
FAIR GROUNDS 12�
HOLL OWAY O
�� uL� AVE. L1
28
ALDRICH OGOODRICH L
SU MME r } COURSE q F- 119 2. 119
AVE. ® N 5
ui ARENA Z
t.
! � Goodrich N � 1+1 W 3'
�• Pork Hillside ° T LL ClR, c---
Paris >- 3 Y RtPLEY AVE. RIPLEY AVE v>'
O z Z °� i21 N KINGSTON N AvE. KINGSTON z w AVE. LPRIC
AVE.
g ►� 29 m
uj
3 z IItCKNIGHT W LARPENTEUR A IL
LL
0 _3 EIDAHO A VE.
cc: cc
ST. PAU L s Q
HO YT AVE.
7 MONTANA AVE MONTAN MONTANA
CIR.
TEVUN QW AVE. or G ° '
cr. J CIR
LNEBRASa O��'a�\ 1 Mle
jW
W ��5 1 2 REaEc
o0 1440 N
Nebraska e �Y
c-- ARLINGTON
T Ci(1P OAKHIU I%T
PROJECT
99 -13
960N
32
10
720N
5 PINE T
6 6IRCI'h
ROLLIN
LLJ
J
n
Q
0
�o
BARTELMY ACRES NEIGHBORHOOD
Maplewood, Minnesota
Agendaltem �Z
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Building Design, Site and Landscape Plan Revisions — First Finan&tlOn by C ounci l:
LOCATION:
L East of 2025 E. County Road D
DATE: June 23, 1999d'a�d�.„,,,
INTRODUCTION
On June 22, 1998, the city council approved plans for the First Financial office building for Tony
Sampair on County Road D. The council also approved two setback variances from the east lot
line. One was for 20 -foot side -yard building setback variance (100 feet required; 80 feet
proposed) and the other was for a five -foot parking lot setback variance (20 feet required; 15 feet
proposed). Refer to the maps on pages 4-6 and the council minutes on pages 8 -11.
Mr. Sampair revised his building design, site and landscape plans (page. 7). Refer to the
previously approved plans and the current proposal (separate attachments). The proposed
changes are:
1. The building is now proposed to be almost entirely brick and would have a flat roof. It was to
have an exterior of brick and stucco with a hip roof.
2. A 16 -space parking lot has been added on the south side of the building. This area was
shown as lawn.
3. The landscaping plan has been revised to fit the new,site plan.
REVIEW PROCEDURE FOR PLAN CHANGES
The city council had a condition of approval in their motion which allowed the director of
community development to approve miner changes to plans. Staff does not consider the
proposed building- design change to be minor. The city code requires that major revisions be
submitted to the community design review board (CDRB) for their review. Furthermore, revisions
to plans the city council has approved must be submitted to them for their approval (Section 25-
65 -c).
DISCUSSION
Building Design and Materials
The proposed building design changes are attractive. Staff preferred the earlier pitched -roof
design, but the revised flat -roof design is typical of many commercial buildings and is acceptable.
On June 22, the CDRB recommended that the applicant enhance the south elevation by adding
arches over the two middle windows and by adding a gable -peak detail on the top of that exterior
wall. These would be attractive changes. The board also recommended that the applicant
submit the color scheme of the building for staff approval.
Parking
Staff does not have any problem with the revised parking layout. The revised plafi meets code.
Landscaping
The revised landscape plan is better than the previously- approved plan. There are more trees
and they are of a better quality. Previously there were 22 trees proposed (13 Amur Maples and
nine Royal Crabs). Now the applicant is proposing 24 trees (18 Black Hills Spruce, two
Greenspire Linden, two Autumn Blaze Maple and two Patmore Ash).
Conclusion
Staff has no problem with the proposed revisions as long as the original conditions of approval
are still met. I deleted Conditions 2b(1, 2 and 3) since the plans address these parking and
setback issues and, also, Condition Seven since the architectural plans have changed. I added
a new Condition 2.b., another sentence to Condition 3.e. and a new Condition 7 as
recommended by the CDRB.
COMMITTEE ACTION
June 22, 1999: The CDRB recommended approval of the proposed revisions.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the revised building elevations, site plan and landscape plans date - stamped
June 4, 1999, for the proposed First Financial building east of 2025 E. County Road D.
Approval is based on the findings required by the code and subject to adherence to the
approved plans and compliance with the revised conditions of approval as follows (additions to
the original motion are underlined and deletions are crossed out):
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. Before getting a building permit the applicant shall:
a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans for city engineer approval.
b. Submit revised building elevations for the south elevation o_ f the building showing arches
over the two middle windows and a gable -peak detail on the top of the exterior wall.
3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
2
a. install a handicap parking sign for each handicap parking space. Handicap spaces must
comply with ADA requirements. One space must be van accessible.
g ._
b. Paint any rooftop mechanical equipment to match the color of the upper part of the
building. (code requirement)
c. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure to match the building with a 100 percent opaque
gate. (code requirement)
d. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. (code requirement)
e. Direct or shield the site lights so they do not shine in drivers eyes. The applicant shall
provide a lighting to staff for approval.
f. Provide continuous concrete curbing around all parking lots and. drives.
g. Post the nine- foot -wide parking spaces for employees only. (code requirement)
Parking spaces for visitors or customers must be at least 9 % feet wide.
h. Sod all turf areas, including the boulevard, except planting beds. if a different ground
cover or mulch is to be used.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work.
The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished
landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter or
within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work.
5. Signs are not approved in this review. The applicant must submit the sign plans to staff for
approval and obtain the necessary sign permits.
6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
7e The proposed color scheme for the building shall be submitted to staff for approval.
p:sec3ftam pair. 99
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Previously Approved Site Plan
4. Revised Site Plan
5. June 22, 1998 city council minutes
6. Previously Approved Plans date - stamped May 13, 1998 (separate attachments)
7. Revised Plans date - stamped June 4, 1999 (separate attachments)
3
Attachment
MMfT CT.
UNTRYVIEW CIR.
LUTH CT.
NA AVE.
NORTH SAINT PAUL
li
LOCATION MAP
4
WHITE BLAR LAKE
D
GALL AVE.
W , M Jk 0
J
v Wes
UA
WE.
U
E--
A
Z No
9 Park
W
T CASTLE AVE. �,
O
COPE AVE. Pg • Gk'
T
.
O
Z
p
�
p
W
DEMONT �
AVE.
Pak ' @ROOKS
AVE.
1 "OOKS
o
AVE.
D
SEX
TANT
Z
R
AVE.
� spy
i
>-
GERMS
W
v
GRANDVIEW
z
�
AVE,
VIKING
DR.
Y
SHERREN AVE.
Kn cCad lake
�4---2Ji
avF.
NORTH SAINT PAUL
li
LOCATION MAP
4
WHITE BLAR LAKE
D
GALL AVE.
W , M Jk 0
J
EL �,
' Cl
E--
A
Z
L
T CASTLE AVE. �,
O
COPE AVE. Pg • Gk'
NORTH SAINT PAUL
li
LOCATION MAP
4
WHITE BLAR LAKE
D
GALL AVE.
W , M Jk 0
J
HLLacnment L
V Icy 'ee`a.as •.•.• • w•.• •
qu, �`'`q •
Vill
v. � . L. 1 I - i 4 •� i
1 =694 '
::.
70
4 2 nd ::::• ozo
7o +� i go
� L
�`� 2.3 7 ac.
• �� 5O oe� t 3a
o " " PERKINS pD�, !EMERALD ,
.,a AMOCO D
65 40, so
/V Ij7¢- INN
wag, Nil MLEARJEJE ' ,; MEL sw
•- fit
ILA _ . Am
--- 4 S6 162'r
1 HARDEE'S
.d W .c a v �• . 040
.o W 1:g8ic. O
� 1• o
Z -110 4 140 2G •
W
A� > . 4
Q c ' MIENEKE MUFFLER
LEA
TF
tz
m
t
.ao
or
NO
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
5
4
N
2075 2091
e d
03
COUNTY ROAD D
- i
\ wlift ww 1
Attachment 3
HOMY, ON
�c
lc 4N
•1!
an M
K u l "
•
OMO now
IIt �!f
�MfO►R � w�UK -Tip
ou
two
C��DIID �
Mrs pow w w �wrc
ws -V
wMr�e ow -
wa�wruc
SITE PLAN
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
i
N
SITE PLAN 4
REVISED PROPOSAL N
4
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, June 22, 1998
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 98 -13
Attachment 5
4. 7:44 P.M.: First Financial Office Building (East of 2025 E. Co. Rd. D)
Building Setback Variance
Parking Lot Setback Variance
Design Approval (Building, Site and Landscape Plans)
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
b. Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
c. Boa rdmember Mary Robinson presented the Community Design Review Board
report.
d. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following person was heard:
Tony Sam air, 2950 White Bear Avenue, Applicant
Dave Ube l, 2191 County Road D
e. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following ResolutiQn and M"Y1
its .••• •i
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SETBACK VARIANCE
WHEREAS, Mr. Tony Sampair applied for setback variances from the zoning ordinance.
WHEREAS, these variances apply to the parcel east of 2025 E. County Road D.
The legal description is:
The easterly 156.01 feet of the westerly 354.01 feet of the southwest 1/4
of the southeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 30 North, Range 22 West, lying
southerly of the southerly right -of -way line of Interstate Highway No. 694.
WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c )(6) of the Maplewood code requires that commercial
buildings with over 3000 square feet of wall surface area be set back 100 feet
from property that is zoned residential.
og
WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c)(5)(b) of the Maplewood code requires that commercial
parking lots be set back 20 feet from property that is zoned residential.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a building setback of 80 feet and a
parking lot setback of 15 feet.
WHEREAS, this requires variances of 20 feet and five feet.
WHEREAS, the history of these variances is as follows:
1. On May 26, 1998, the community design review board recommended that
the City Council approve this variance.
2. The City Council held a public hearing on June 22, 1998. City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave
everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written
statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations
from the City staff and review board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described variance for the following reasons:
1. Requiring side parking and building setbacks to meet code would
result in an unattractive and ill- conceived site plan because the
building would be crowded toward the west lot line.
2. The adjacent lot to the east is planned for BC (business commercial)
and will be considered for a land use plan change to BC in the near
future by the City staff.
3. Complying with the code would cause the applicant undue hardship
because of the inconsistency of the zoning and land use designation
for the lot to the east.
4. The proposed variances would be in keeping with the spirit and intent
of the ordinance because the house on the abutting lot is 225 feet
away -:and is screened by mature trees.
Seconded b y Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
6 -22 -98
E
f. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the building. site and
'n_g Rlans date -s
Financial Buildir� east o 2025E County Road D. subject to the
following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a
building permit for this project.
2. Before getting a building permit the applicant shall:
a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans for City
engineer approval.
b. Revise the site plan for staff approval by:
(1) Omitting the driveway connection to the adjacent lot.
(2) Adding one more handicap - accessible parking space for a total
of 58 parking spaces.
(3) Providing a 15 -foot parking -lot setback from the north lot
line.
3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the
building:
a. Install a handicap parking sign for each handicap parking space.
Handicap spaces must comply with ADA requirements. One space must
be van accessible.
b. Paint any rooftop mechanical equipment to match the color of the
upper part of the building. (code requirement)
c. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure to match the building with a
100 percent opaque gate. (code requirement)
d. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped
areas. (code requirement)
e. Direct or shield the site lights so they do not shine in drivers
eyes.
f. Provide continuous concrete curbing around all parking lots and
drives.
g. Post the nine - foot -wide parking spaces for employees only (code
requirement). Parking spaces for visitors or customers must be
at least 9 � feet wide.
h. Sod all turf areas, including the boulevard, except planting beds if
a different ground cover or mulch is to be used.
4. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy
if:
a. The City determines that the work is not essential to the public
health, safety or welfare.
b. The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit
for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost
of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be
completed by June 1 if the building. is occurPi ed in the f a l l or
winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in spri ng
or summer.
c. The City receives an agreement that will allow the City to complete
any unfinished work.
5. Signs are not approved in this review. The applicant must submit the
sign plans to staff for approval and obtain the necessary sign permits.
6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community
Development may approve minor changes.
7. The architectural plans are approved with the deletion of the brick
accent from the.second story with a substitution of stucco instead.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
6 -22 -98
71
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JUNE 22, 1999
V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. First Financial Design Revisions Tony Sampair, County Road D
Secretary Tom Ekstrand presented the staff report. The board had no questions for Mr.
Ekstrand. Tom Hastings of Hastings & Associates, the construction manager for this project,
said all of the conditions in the staff recommendation that apply to construction are currently
on the documents or will be provided. He said when the electrical plan is complete, a parking
lot light layout will be submitted to staff. Mr. Hastings felt the possibility of lights shining into
the neighbor to the east is no longer an issue. Tony Sampair, the applicant, was also
available to answer questions.
Mr. Hastings did not have samples of the building materials with him but offered to submit
them for review. He said the design was changed from a hip -roof, wood building to a flat -roof
masonry structure because of quality and durability.
Chairperson Ledvina noted that "extra effort" had been put into the north facade of the
building for the benefit of freeway traffic. He felt the south facade was important for the
residents of Maplewood and suggested that the applicant provide some arch windows above
the center windows of both floors on this side. Boardmember Shankar agreed with Mr.
Ledvina and mentioned a previous application where the owner was required to upgrade the
south side of the building. Mr. Hastings spoke of copying the front of the north side on the
lower half of the south side. He was agreeable to arching the two middle windows on the
south elevation of the first floor and creating a peak above those two windows.
Boardmember Robinson moved the Community Design Review Board approve the revised
building elevations, site plan and landscape plans date - stamped June 4, 1999, for the
proposed First Financial building east of 2025 E. County Road D. Approval is based on the
findings required by the code and subject to adherence to the approved plans and compliance
with the revised conditions of approval as follows (additions to the original motion are
underlined and deletions are crossed out):
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Before getting a building permit the applicant shall:
a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans for city engineer approval.
111 11 11 1
E`Vr 14160411111111
r
Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes of 06 -22 -99
3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Install a handicap parking sign for each handicap parking space. Handicap
spaces must comply with ADA requirements. One space must be van accessible.
b. Paint any rooftop mechanical equipment to match the color of the upper part of
the building. (code requirement)
c. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure to match the building with a 100 percent
opaque gate. (code requirement)
d. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. (code
requirement)
e. Direct or shield the site lights so they do not shine in drivers eyes.
f. Provide continuous concrete curbing around all parking lots and drives.
g. Post the nine - foot -wide parking spaces for employees only. (code requirement)
Parking spaces for visitors or customers must be at least 9 %2 feet wide.
h. Sod all turf areas, including the boulevard, except planting beds if a different
ground cover or mulch is to be used.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work.
The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished
landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or
winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished
work.
5. Signs are not approved in this review. The applicant must submit the sign plans to staff
for approval and obtain the necessary sign permits.
6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
7. All color of outside material used subject to staff review. 71:161V P 110-alml0s re
PH V
staeee- it�s�eaeF:
8. Arch the two middle windows on the first floor under the south elevation to create a peak,
subject to staff review.
Community Design Review Board -3-
Minutes of 06 -22 -99
Boardmember Johnson seconded.
Chairperson Ledvina offered a friendly amendment to modify 3.e. to read: "A lighting plan shall be
submitted for staff approval.
Ayes all
The motion passed.
r
{
i
AGENDA ITEM
t r
AGENDA REPORT
. Aet I s li
j Council*
TO: Michael A. McGuire, City Managercc # #��
b
FROM: Michael A. Ericson, Assistant to the City Managera�
RE: Educational and Marketing Plan for Three Referendums
DATE: July 6, 1999
INTRODUCTION
At its June 28, 1999 meeting the Maplewood City Council discussed and approved the three
referendums which will be considered by voters on the fall election ballot on November 2, 1999.
Citizens will have an opportunity to vote on a $3.54M Fire Safety Referendum, a $3.47M Parks
Redevelopment Referendum, and a No Cost to Taxpayers Referendum to increase the number of
On -Sale Liquor Licenses from the current 25 to 32. Staff was directed to prepare an educational
and marketing plan including a budget to inform citizens about the three referendums.
BACKGROUND
Staff met to discuss the three individual referendums and the different methods that can be used
to educate residents so they can understand the rational and need for each. Staff agreed that a
g
multi- faceted public relations approach be used to reach as many citizens as possible and even
more importantly to organize the Get - Out - The -Vote effort to ensure that all voters will be
represented. A four -page, two- color, glossy informational brochure will be produced and direct
mailed to every household in Maplewood. Since this educational brochure will be the ci
primary info piece there will be 20,000 printed and distributed at every opportune including
g
Maplewood City Hall, Maplewood Community Center, Maplewood Mall Office, Carver Gym
Edgerton Gym, Parks Programs - Midsummer Nights, National Night Out, Y2K Public
Informational Meetings, Fire Station Open Houses, and many other public s. atherin
g g
There will also be a video professionally produced by GTN 16 and it will include p ersonal p ublic
testimony from prominent Maplewood residents or business owners who represent various
groups, organizations, and businesses. Suggested names include Mayor George Rossbach
Judge Gary Bastian, City Councilmembers, Don Larson, Tom Kelly, Susan Vass, Carolyn
Y
Peterson, Milo Thompson, Audrey Duellman, Jack Hillstrom, N.E. S.A. representative M.A.A.
representative and an Adult Softball representative.
Agenda Report
July 6, 1999
Page 2
An organized phone bank will be used to contact as many voters as possible since the success of
the "Get- Out - The - Vote" is as important as educating residents about the three referendums. A
door -to -door literature drop will be organized in an effort to have as much face -to -face contact
with residents as possible. The fire department has already g a organized public relations effort
with its architect and printed a number of promotional "Help Us Help You" frisbees and water
bottles which will be distributed throughout the community. There is a significant amount of
public relations effort included with the Fire Safety Referendum as per the architectural
agreement with SEH Architects who have promotional experience in educating residents about
fire - station- referendums. A cooperative joint effort with SEH Architects will assist the city oth
. . i Y
financially and in distributing more information about the other two referendums directly to
residents. An estimated budget of $8,000 for a comprehensive "Together We Can" educational
and marketing plan was ' agreed to by city staff and is hereby submitted to council for approval.
RECOMMENDATION
The city council should consider the educational and marketing plan and approve the budget of
$8,000 to properly inform, educate, and promote the $3.54M Fire Safety Referendum, the
$3.47M Parks Redevelopment Referendum, and the No Taxpayer Cost Seven Additional On-
Sale Liquor Licenses Referendum.