Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 08-23 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 23,1999 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 99 -18 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting 99 -17 (August 9, 1999) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS NONE G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Acceptance of Project 97 -16 Harvester Avenue Improvement 3. Community Design Review Board Appointments 4. Acceptance of Donation - Police Department 5. Certification of Election Judges 6. Temporary Gambling License - Holy Redeemer Parish 7. Temporary Strong Beer and Wine License - Church of St. Jerome H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. Waldorf School (70 County Road B) - Land Use Place Change (BC to S) - 4 votes - Conditional Use Permit - Design Approval 2. 7:15 P.M. Dege Garden Center Conditional Use Permit Revision (831 Century Avenue) 3. 7:30 P.M. Repeal of Chapter 1306 of Minnesota Building Code (Sec. 9- 24(3)a of the City Code (1st Reading) I. AWARD OF BIDS NONE J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS NONE K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Corbey Property Open Space - N.W. corner of Highway 61 and County Road C - Authorization to Purchase - Land Use Plan Change (R -1 to OS) - 4 votes 2. Bradley Oaks Open Space Site -Idaho Avenue, east of Sterling Street - Authorization to Purchase - Land Use Plan Change (R -1 to OS) - 4 votes 3. 1999 Tax = Increment Funding Housing Replacement Plan 4. Preliminary Approval of 1999 Tax Increment Bond Issue 5. 2000 Proposed Budget 6. Consider Appointment to the Rush Line Task Force L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Mayor's Mailbox 2. 3. 4. 5. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Referendums 2. 3. 4. O. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 9,1999 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 99 -17 A. CALL TO ORDER: A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Rossbach. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: C. ROLL CALL: George Rossbach, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present Kevin Kittridge, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Absent D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Councilmember Kittridge moved to approve the minutes of the Council/Manager Worksho (July 6 1999 g p � ) as presented/correcte Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 99 -16 ( July 26, 1999) as presented/cor Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Rossbach moved to approve the Agenda as amended. M -2. Randy Kelly Letter Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS: NONE 8 -9 -99 1 G. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Seconded by Kittridge 1. Approval of Claims ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $3,967.38 $322,515.00 $38,152.40 $317,426.70 Ayes - all Checks #7991 thru #7995 dated 7 -19 thru 7 -23 -99 Checks #44887 thru #44982 dated 7 -27 -99 Checks #7996 thru #80,05 dated 7 -23 thru 7 -29 -99 Checks #44985 thru #45099 dated 8 -3 -99 $682,061.48 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $435,188.08 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 7 -23 -99 $22,103.86 Payroll Deduction check #73370 thru #73376 dated 7 -23 -99 $457,291.94 Total Payroll $1,,139,353.42 GRAND TOTAL 2. Budget Change - Crack Seal/Seal Coat Approved a budget adjustment of $40,000 for the overlay and seal coat program for this year. 3. Budget Adjustment - State Aid Street Construction Account Authorized a budget transfer in the state aid street construction account of $14,000 to allow for reconstruction of the retaining wall at the northwest corner of Beam Avenue and Bellaire Avenue. 4. Budget Transfer - Human Resources Information System Authorized a budget transfer of $13,500 to finance the purchase of Human Resources Information System Software and related costs with the understanding that the 2000 budget will be decreased by the same amount. 8 -9 -99 2 5. Budget Transfer - Police Officer Administrative Testing Fee Authorized a budget transfer of $460 to police officer testing costs. 6. Prosecuting Attorney Contract Approved Bannigan and Kelly for prosecuting services on October 1, 1,999. 7. Temporary Gambling - Hill Murray School Adopted the following resolution authorizing temporary lawful gambling for Hill Murray School. 99-08-072 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY LAWFUL GAMBLING Hill- Murray School at Hill - Murray School, 2625 Larpenteur Avenue East BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit for temporary lawful gambling is approved for Hill- Murray School to operate at the Hill- Murray School, 2625 Larpenteur Avenue East, Maplewood, Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213 and the City allows the Board to issue a permit before 30 days. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. 8. Temporary Gambling - United Cerebral Palsy of Minnesota Adopted the following resolution authorizing temporary lawful gambling for United Cerebral Palsy of Minnesota. 99-08-073 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY LAWFUL GAMBLING United Cerebral Palsy of Minnesota at Champps Restaurant, 1734 Adolphus Street BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit for temporary lawful gambling is approved for United Cerebral Palsy of Minnesota to operate at Champps Restaurant, 1734 Adolphus Street Maplewood, Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the 8 -9 -99 3 Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213 and the City allows the Board to issue a permit before 30 days. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. 9. Budget Adjustment - Fire Department Air Conditioning Unit Accepted a bid from Acclaim Services in the amount of $6,210 for the replacement of the air - conditioning unit at Hazelwood Fire Station and authorized a budget transfer of $6,210 to cover the expenses. H. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 7:00 P.M. Excel Systems Expansion (2075 Prosperity Road) - Conditional Use Permit - Design Approval a. Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing. b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. c. Associate Planner Ekstrand presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Dale Trippler presented the Planning Commission report. e. Boardmember Ananth Shankar presented the Community Design Review Board report. f. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents of opponents. The following persons were heard: Alma Fitzloff, 6222 Chesshire Lane, Maple Grove Garth Ristow, Langer Construction, 54 Moreland Ave, St. Paul g. Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution approving a conditional use permit for a 7,570 - square -foot addition forte business at rosperity Road. and move its adoption: 99 -08 -074 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Alma Fitzloff, representing Excel Air Systems, requested a conditional use permit to build a 7,570 - square -foot addition on an existing building closer than 350 feet to a residential district. This building is located at 2075 Prosperity Road. The legal description is: DESCRIPTIONS OF EXISTING THREE PARCEL 8 -9 -99 4 A. NORTHERLY PARCEL (per deed Doc. No. 1870889) Lot three (3), Block seven (7), SABIN GARDEN LOTS, except the West 139.9 feet and except the North 151.6 feet and except that part thereof described as follows: Commencing at a point on the North line of said Lot Three (3) a distance of 139.9 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof, thence South parallel to the West line of said Lot Three (3), a distance of 151.6 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence East parallel to the North line of said Lot Three (3), a distance of 85.1 feet; thence South parallel to the West line of said Lot Three (3) a distance of 90 feet; thence Southeasterly parallel to the South line of said Lot Three (3), to the Westerly line of Prosperity Avenue, thence Southwesterly along the Westerly line of Prosperity Avenue to the Southeast corner of said Lot Three (3); thence Westerly along the Southerly line of Lot Three (3), 142.5 feet; thence North 226.9 feet to the point of beginning. B. SOUTHERLY PARCEL (per deed Doc. No. 252803 1) That part of Lot 3, Block 7, SABIN GARDEN LOTS, lying Southerly of the following described line: Commencing at a point 139.90 feet East of the West line of said Lot 3 and 151.60 feet South of the North line of said Lot 3; thence South along a line 139.90 feet East of and parallel with the West line of said Lot 3 a distance of 92.32 feet to the point of beginning of line to be described; thence Easterly deflecting to the left 81 ° 3 8' 25" a distance of 13 8.3 8 feet; thence Southeasterly deflecting to the right 12' 20'00" a distance of 84.00 feet more or less to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 3 distant 125.58 feet Northeasterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 3 and there terminating. C. REMNANT/MIDDLE PARCEL (no document found - description prepared by Sunde Land Surveying, LLC.) That part of Lot 3, Block 7, SABIN GARDEN LOTS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the west 139.9 feet of said Lot 3 and lying southerly of a line described as commencing at a point on the north line of said Lot 3 distant 139.9 feet east of the northwest corner thereof; thence south, parallel with the west line of said Lot 3, a distance of 151.6 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence east, parallel with the north line of said Lot 3, a distance of 85.1 feet; thence south, parallel with the west line of said Lot 3, a distance of 90.0 feet; thence southeasterly, parallel with the south line of said Lot 3, to the southeasterly line of said Lot 3 and said line there terminating, Except that part of said Lot 3 lying southerly of the following described line: Commencing at a point 139.90 feet East of the West line of said Lot 3 and 151.60 feet South of the North line of said Lot 3; thence South along a line 139.90 feet East of and parallel with the West line of said Lot 3 a distance of 92.32 feet to the point of beginning of line to be described; thence Easterly deflecting to the left 81 ° 3 8' 25" a distance of 13 8.3 8 feet; thence Southeasterly deflecting to the right 12' 20' 00" a distance of 84.00 feet more or less to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 3 distant 125.5 8 feet Northeasterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 3 and there terminating. PROPOSED DESCRIPTION OF COMBINED THREE PARCELS That part , of Lot 3, Block 7, SABIN GARDEN LOTS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the west 139.9 feet and lying southerly of the north 151.6 feet of said Lot 3. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On July 19, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On August 9, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 8 -9 -99 S 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and, sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. Storage outside the building is prohibited unless allowed by the city council. 5. The hours that business may generate noise that can be heard off -site are: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday — Friday and 8 a.m. to 12 noon Saturday. Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Councilmembers Kittridge, Carlson, Allenspach Nays - Mayor Ro s sb ach Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the plans date - stamped June 23, 1999 for the 7,570- square -foot addition to Excel Air Systems, 2075 Prospen Road. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: 8 -9 -99 6 a. Provide continuous concrete curbing around the perimeter of the proposed parking lot and driveway. b. Screen any new rooftop mechanical equipment that would be visible from residential properties. (code requirement) C. An inground lawn - irrigation system shall not be required for the landscaping since the site is landscaped now and is well maintained. d. Provide site - security lighting as required by the code. The light source, including the lens covering the bulb, shall be concealed so not to cause any nuisance to drivers or neighbors. The applicant shall submit a lighting plan to staff for approval. (code requirement) e. Install a handicap parking sign for the handicap parking space. The handicap space must comply with ADA requirements. This space must be van accessible. f. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure to match the building with a 100 percent opaque gate. (code requirement) 3. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. 4. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - all I. AWARD OF BIDS NONE J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS NONE K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Amendments to Cable Franchise Agreement - Exhibits A & E a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. 8 -9 -99 7 Councilmember Carlson moved to approve Exhibits A and E of the Cable Television Franchise Agreement with Media One and adopt ea ch in t for hereby su bmitted y the commission attorneys. Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - all 2. Date Change Council Manager Workshop a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Carlson moved to reschedule the September Council/Manager Workshop meeting to Tuesday, September 7, 1999 at the regular start time of P.M. Seconded by Councilmember Ayes - all 3. Resolution Postponing the Sale of 1999 Improvement Bonds a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Finance Director Faust presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents of opponents. The following person(s) were /was heard: Councilmember Kittridge moved to approve the following resolution which postpones the sale of the 1999 General Obligation Improvement Bonds unt - - 99-08-075 RESOLUTION POSTPONING THE COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATED SALE OF $940,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1999A WHEREAS, on July 26, 1999, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City "), adopted a resolution (the "Resolution ") which provided for the competitive negotiated sale of its $940,000 General Obligation Improvements Bonds, Series 1999A (the "Bonds ") to finance the construction of various improvements projects within the City; and WHEREAS, because the City may soon be issuing its general obligation tax increments bonds, it has hereto fore been determined and declared to be more expedient to sell both issues on the same day; and WHEREAS, it has therefore been determined that: (I) the date of receiving, opening and tabulating proposals, and considering the sale of the Bonds for award should be postponed to September 27, 1999, and (ii) the date of original issue of the Bonds should be revised to October 1, 1999; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, 8 -9 -99 8 Ilk Minnesota, as follows: 1. Amendment. The "Terms of Proposal" attached to the Resolution as Exhibit A is hereby amended as follows the ate of receiving, opening and tabulating proposals, and considering the Bonds for award is changed from August 19, 1999 to September 27, 1999; and (ii) the date of original issue of the Bonds is hereby changed from September 1, 1999 to October 1, 1999. 2. Amended Terms of Proposal. A copy of the Terms of Proposal, as amended, is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. Remain in Full Force and Effect. All other terms and conditions of the Resolution, except as herein amended,, shall remain in full force and effect. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS NONE M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Mayor's Mailbox - Mayor Rossbach thanked city staff that helped make National Night Out a success. 2. Randy Kelly letter - Councilmember Carlson expressed his offense by the actions and statements from Senator Kelly on the white Bear Avenue Development Collaborative. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Referendums - City Manager McGuire gave an update on the referendums and informed Council that in the near future a sample "informational" brochure will be brought to the Council. O. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Kittridge moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:43 P.M. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all Karen E. Gil i of le, City Clerk 8 -9 -99 9 AGENDA NO, G -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director b F RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: August 16, 1999 Aotion by Couul 13: Endorse Medifi'ea. _ Rejecte Dates Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $58,032.56 Checks #8006 thru #8017 dated 8 -2 thru 8 -6 -99 $237,415.40 Checks #45102 thru #45247 dated 8 -10 -99 $111,678.76 Checks #8018 thru #8025 dated 8 -9 -99 thru 8 -12 -99 $84,458.07 Checks #45250 thru #45351 dated 8 -17 -99 $491,584.79 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $317,158.50 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 8 -6 -99 $26,978.42 Payroll Deduction check #73566 thru #73573 dated 8 -6 -99 $344, 136.92 Total Payroll $835,721.71 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on pp g file if necessary. hu Attachments C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN\AGENDA\AAPRCL16.AUG VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 08/06/99 16:55 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 8006 08/02/99 540778 MING'S GARDEN FOOD - COUNCIL /MGR WORKSHOP 49.00 49.00 8007 08/02/99 520472 MCDONALD'S ORANGE DRINK CONCENTRATE 17.36 17.36 8008 08/03/99 200830 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN PETTY CASH FOR NNO 60.00 60.00 8009 08/04/99 330680 HEALTHPARTNERS HCMA DEDUCTION PAY 3 HEALTH- LIFE - DENTAL INS. 16,867.45 A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 3 24,489.75 8010 08/04/99 530100 MEDICA CHOICE HCMA DEDUCTION PAY 4 HEALTH - LIFE - DENTAL INS. 20,230.78 A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 3 27,960.90 8011 08/04/99 551100 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE HCMA DEDUCTION PAY 283.00 LIFE INSURANCE PAYABLE 1 HEALTH-LIFE- DENTAL INS. 868.68 A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 100.11 2 8012 08/04/99 320293 GREAT -WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INS JULY 1999 PREMIUM 616.50 616.50 8013 08/05/99 750560 RENEE'S CAFE AND DELI LUNCHES /SERGEANT ORALS PANEL 32.05 32.05 8014 08/05/99 280200 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. LTD INSURANCE - AUGUST 1999 1 1 8015 08/06/99 712105 PIZZA HUT PIZZA /UNITED WAY MTG 24.00 24.00 8016 08/06/99 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 517.00 517.00 8017 08/06/99 900200 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE PICK UP CHARGE 10.00 10.00 45102 08/10/99 UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKE REFUND -AMB 99012722 631.60 631.60 45103 08/10/99 SEIFERT, CARMIAN REFUND -GOLF CAMP 15.00 15.00 45104 08/10/99 BELL, HOWARD REFUND -GOLF CAMP 10.50 10.50 45105 08/10/99 FALTEISEK, JODELL REFUND -GOLF CAMP 45.00 45.00 45106 08/10/99 FITZGERALD, BRIAN REFUND-GOLF CAMP 45.00 45.00 45107 08/10/99 CASEY, CYNTHIA REFUND -GOLF CAMP 15.00 15.00 45108 08/10/99 ROESER, DIANE REFUND -GOLF CAMP 15.00 15.00 45109 08/10/99 TERRELL, SARAH REFUND -GOLF CAMP 10.50 10.50 45110 08/10/99 MILES, CHRISTINE REFUND - TENNIS 30.00 30.00 45111 08/10/99 HABEN, MARY REFUND -YOUTH SOCCER 35.00 35.00 1 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 08/06/99 16:55 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 45112 08/10/99 VIRGIN, KRIS REFUND-SWIM 38.00 38.00 45113 08/10/99 PETERSEN, SANDRA REFUND -SWIM 38.00 38.00 45114 08/10/99 SCHUNEMAN, MARY REFUND -SWIM 28.00 28.00 45115 08/10/99 SCHULTZ, DEBBIE REFUND -SWIM 38.00 38.00 45116 08/10/99 ELLIS, ABHA REFUND -SWIM 38.00 38.00 45117 08/10/99 U -CARE MINNESOTA REFUND-AMB 99004868 63.02 63.02 45118 08/10/99 HEALTH PARTNERS REFUND -AMB 98019415 53.55 53.55 45119 08/10/99 010575 ACE HARDWARE MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3.43 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 172.21 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 460.11 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 245.08 880.83 45120 08/10/99 010700 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL, INC. PEST CONTROL 133.08 PEST CONTROL 79.88 PEST CONTROL 79.88 PEST CONTROL 47.93 340.77 45121 08/10/99 020005 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC. PICK UP TRUCK DECALS -0 & U2 372.75 372.75 45122 08/10/99 020411 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE CELLULAR PHONE 30.40 CELLULAR PHONE 30.40 CELLULAR PHONE 30.40 CELLULAR PHONE 333.56 CELLULAR PHONE 1.95 CELLULAR PHONE 29.08 CELLULAR PHONE 6.25 CELLULAR PHONE 226.13 688.17 45123 08/10/99 020950 ALPHA BITS ENTERTAINMENT FOR MSNC 255.00 255.00 45124 08/10/99 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MATS -PD 37.88 37.88 45125 08/10/99 030415 ANDERSON, EARL F., INC. 6' & 7' GALVANIZED POSTS 2 2 45126 08/10/99 030640 ANDON INC. HELIUM 64.38 64.38 45127 08/10/99 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC. ANIMAL CONTROL 7/21 - 7/31 756.73 756.73 45128 08/10/99 050600 AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS, INC. BALANCE OWING ON INV 15.00 15.00 45129 08/10/99 061906 BAUER BUILT BATTERIES,TIRE,WHITE WHEEL 191.29 191.29 45130 08/10/99 070100 BEARCOM RADIUS SM120 UHF,MOTOROLA ANT 932.65 932.65 2 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 08/06/99 16:55 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 45131 08/10/99 090795 BROCK WHITE COMPANY, LLC. SWITCH 14.06 14.06 45132 08/10/99 110495 CARSONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP. ORANGE SQ LINK FENCE 1,024.78 1,024.78 45133 08/10/99 120524 CENTURY BOOKSTORE MEDIC SCHOOL SUPPLIES-SHORTREE 38.01 38.01 45134 08/10/99 120525 CENTURY COLLEGE EMT SCHOOL APP FEE- HOHN,HAYES 40.00 40.00 45135 08/10/99 131615 CITY WIDE RADIO INC. HEADSET SYSTEM -M3 42.00 HEADSET SYSTEM -M7 84.00 126.00 45136 08/10/99 151335 COMPRESSAIR & EQUIPMENT CO. BAUER MAINT AGREE-8 /1 - 12/31 1 1,280.00 45137 08/10/99 152300 COORDINATED BUSINESS SYSTEMS MAINT AGRMNT -MITA LDC -550 FAX 338.53 338.53 45138 08/10/99 152400 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. PLOTTER PAPER 52.35 52.35 45139 08/10/99 161130 CRAMER BUILDING SERVICES RENTAL OF PORTABLE A/C UNITS 1 RPR & MAINT /A /C 2,250.28 RPR & MAINT-A /C CITY HALL 183.24 REPLACE CONDENSER @ P/W BLDG 14 RPR & MAINT /PW BLDG 1 19 45140 08/10/99 161348 CRYSTAL CAVES 25 ADMISSIONS 87.50 87.50 45141 08/10/99 170200 CUB FOODS - MAPLEWOOD EAST SUPPLIES FOR AIR 1 98.71 98.71 45142 08/10/99 170250 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS, INC. DOOR REPAIR /E4 64.80 64.80 45143 08/10/99 170900 D & D TOWING SERVICE INC. TOW FOR SQUAD 942 47.93 47.93 45144 08/10/99 180800 DALCO SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 697.04 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 57.42 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 430.70 1 45145 08/10/99 180985 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO. BLACK HELMETS 460.00 YELLOW HELMETS 489.90 YELLOW HELMETS 481.62 1 45146 08/10/99 190200 DEPT OF COMMERCE NOTARY COMM FEES-S ZWIEG 40.00 40.00 45147 08/10/99 220205 DYNAMIC SOLUTIONS GROUP INC. SERVER REPAIR 120.00 120.00 45148 08/10/99 230220 EDI CO. MICROSOLUTIONS REWRITABLE CD -R 384.47 384.47 45149 08/10/99 230280 E.L. REINHARDT COMPANY INC. PADLOCKS 39.30 MASTER PRO SERIES PADLOCKS 26.20 65.50 45150 08/10/99 230960 ECOPRINT BUSINESS CARDS- MEEHAN,WELCHLIN 79.88 BUSINESS CARDS- FAUST,BAUMAN 79.88 159.76 3 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 08/06/99 16:55 VOUCHER / REGISTER E GISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 45151 08/10/99 234450 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE ABSENTEE BALLOT ENVELOPES 139.85 139.85 45152 08/10/99 234485 ELECTROCOM COMMUNICATIONS SYS 18 ELECTROCOM LAPTOP CONVERTER 35 35,532.40 45153 08/10/99 240375 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. RPR & MAINT /M4 1 ANNUAL SERVICE -E3 352.25 ANNUAL SERVICE -R3 352.25 ANNUAL SERVICE -E2 352.25 ANNUAL SERVICE-R2 352.25 ANNUAL SERVICE-E4 352.25 ANNUAL SERVICE-T4 352.50 RPR & MAINT /M4 1 RPR & MAINT /R2 1 CHECK BATTERY -M4 298.12 DOOR REPAIR -E3 91.42 7 45154 08/10/99 250502 EXPERIAN REFERENCE MATERIALS 200.34 200.34 45155 08/10/99 260290 FARMER BROS. CO. COFFEE 186.26 186.26 45156 08/10/99 260295 FARMERS UNION CO-OP OIL PROPANE FOR FIRE DEMO -NNO 80.00 80.00 45157 08/10/99 260656 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES, IN 1.75 X 50' HOSE -STAT 1 414.98 1.75 X 50 HOSE -STAT 4 414.98 3 X 75' HOSE -STAT 4 267.20 3 X 75 HOSE-STAT 4 267.20 MSA SPECTACLE KIT 50.45 1,414.81 45158 08/10/99 280820 FRANNSEN, MARY ANN ENTERTAINMENT FOR MSNC 350.00 350.00 45159 08/10/99 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 11.20 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 63.01 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 74.13 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 45.85 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 25.07 224.45 45160 08/10/99 300550 GE CAPITAL KODAK LEASE PMT-JULY 1999 35.29 KODAK LEASE PMT -JULY 1999 35.29 KODAK LEASE PMT -JULY 1999 1.26 KODAK LEASE PMT -JULY 1999 45.59 KODAK LEASE PMT -JULY 1999 94.99 KODAK LEASE PMT -JULY 1999 84.23 KODAK LEASE PMT -JULY 1999 20.13 KODAK LEASE PMT -JULY 1999 38.83 KODAK LEASE PMT -JULY 1999 94.42 KODAK LEASE PMT-JULY 1999 78.29 528.32 45161 08/10/99 302930 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES QUANTUM FIREBALL H.D. 211.50 211.50 45162 08/10/99 320266 GRAINGER 1/2 HP SUMP PUMP-STAT 8 162.95 162.95 4 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 08/06/99 16:55 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 45163 08/10/99 320501 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC. MEDICAL DIRECTION FEES 12 12,858.75 45164 08/10/99 320638 GYM WORKS REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT 1 1 45165 08/10/99 330403 HASTINGS FIRE DEPT RELIEF ASSO EMT SCHOOL FEES /MATERIALS 380.00 380.00 45166 08/10/99 340110 HEJNY RENTALS, INC WELDER RENTAL 45.85 45.85 45167 08/10/99 340415 HELLO DIRECT, INC. ULTLITE EX SINGLE HEADSET 199.97 199.97 45168 08/10/99 350700 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT,STAIN 34.58 34.58 45169 08/10/99 370075 HUGO'S TREE CARE TREE REMOVAL 958.50 TREE REMOVAL 332.92 TRIM HANGERS FROM STREET TREES 1 GRIND STUMP 42.60 2,452.27 45170 08/10/99 370076 HUGHES & COSTELLO AUGUST RETAINER FEE 5 5 45171 08/10/99 401250 JIM HATCH SALES CO. SHOVELS 78,28 WELDON STROBE LIGHTS 275.98 354.26 45172 08/10/99 401670 JOLLY TYME FAVORS BALLOON SEAR W /RIBBON-NNO 47.08 47.08 45173 08/10/99 420150 KINKO'S CUSTOMER ADM SERVICES DUPLICATING COSTS 55.06 DUPLICATING COSTS 28.22 83.28 45174 08/10/99 430350 GECC/KNOX LUMBER TREATED LUMBER 43.11 43.11 45175 08/10/99 450481 LANDMARK, INC. 2478 ARLINGTON AVE E 1 2478 ARLINGTON AVE E 36.85 1480 MARY ST 1 1480 MARY ST 30.41 2 45176 08/10/99 470700 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS PUBLIC NOTICES 98.42 PUBLIC NOTICES 61.96 160.38 45177 08/10/99 500300 M.A. ASSOCIATES SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 173.53 173.53 45178 08/10/99 510100 MAPLE LEAF OFFICIALS ASSN. ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIALS 4 YOUTH SOFTBALL UMPIRES 135.00 4 45179 08/10/99 510450 MAPLEWOOD AREA HISTORICAL SOC NNO SILENT AUCTION PROCEEDS 438.00 438.00 45180 08/10/99 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BDAY CAKES 82.50 COOKIES 64.50 147.00 45181 08/10/99 511600 MASYS CORP AUGUST 1999 SOFTWARE MAINT 970.50 970.50 45182 08/10/99 530500 MENARDS PAINT SUPPLIES /STAPLES 41.48 41.48 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 08/06/99 16:55 VOUCHER / REGISTER REGIST R FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM I TEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 45183 08/10/99 530560 MERIT CHEVROLET TENSION 47.72 47.72 45184 08/10/99 530755 METROCALL DIGITAL PAGER 10.46 PAGER RENTAL 7/29 -8/28 22.57 33.03 45185 08/10/99 532550 MICROFACS REPAIR MICROFILM MACH 126.50 126.50 45186 08/10/99 540149 MID- AMERICA PLASTICS, INC. REPAIR POOL GUTTER 211.00 211.00 45187 08/10/99 540175 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. POWERADE,POP 238.95 SODA,JUICE,POWERADE,WATER 291.45 FRUIT JUICE,POWERADE,WATER,POP 148.60 TEA,FRUIT JUICE,POWERADE,WATER 638.15 1,317.15 45188 08/10/99 540480 MIKE'S LP GAS & R.V. SERVICE 90 LB LP GAS FILL 30.67 LP GAS 63.79 94.46 45189 08/10/99 540770 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGERS 232.08 232.08 45190 08/10/99 540802 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT. RENT MPLS BURN TRNG BLDG 585.00 585.00 45191 08/10/99 540890 MINN. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION ANNUAL SIGN MANUAL UPDATE 5.00 5.00 45192 08/10/99 542100 MINNESOTA GFOA MGFOA CONF REG -G BAUMAN 210.00 210.00 45193 08/10/99 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO PHOTO DEVELOPING 50.00 FILM PROCESSING 5.40 FILM PROCESSING 6.66 FILM PROCESSING 9.58 PHOTO DEVELOPING 13.80 FILM PROCESSING 6.66 92.10 45194 08/10/99 542455 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 76.59 76.59 45195 08/10/99 570050 MOBILE EMERGENCY SYSTEMS, INC. RPR & MAINT /CHIEF 2 CAR 155.00 155.00 45196 08/10/99 620600 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER INCANDECENT/HALOGEN BULBS 342.63 342.63 45197 08/10/99 630946 NEC SYSTEMS LABORATORY, INC. AURALINE MULTIMEDIA CREATION K 54.95 54.95 45198 08/10/99 640830 NEXT CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES, INC NOVELL UPGRD 4.2 SERVER PLUS 5 5,174.50 45199 08/10/99 661108 NORTH STAR WIPER & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 40.47 40.47 45200 08/10/99 661755 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 4.71 UTILITIES 3.14 UTILITIES 4.40 UTILITIES 3.14 UTILITIES 3.14 UTILITIES 308.64 UTILITIES 333.27 L•J VOUCHRE2 08/06/99 16:55 VOUCHER/ CHECK 4' NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 45201 08/10/99 681151 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 45202 08/10/99 690340 OLSON, ARNOLD G 45203 08/10/99 691160 ON SITE SANITATION CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 7 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 ITEM ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT UTILITIES 222.45 UTILITIES 34.95 UTILITIES 383.50 UTILITIES 99.30 UTILITIES 100.15 UTILITIES 27-57 UTILITIES 129.42 UTILITIES 64.89 UTILITIES 51.24 UTILITIES 150.24 UTILITIES 96.92 UTILITIES 133.77 UTILITIES 155.72 UTILITIES 80.65 UTILITIES 133.92 UTILITIES 168.95 UTILITIES 100.37 UTILITIES 101.84 UTILITIES 92.55 UTILITIES 207.76 UTILITIES 93.65 UTILITIES 17.14 UTILITIES 13.55 UTILITIES 26.90 UTILITIES 461.56 UTILITIES 14.91 UTILITIES 28,87 UTILITIES 90.75 UTILITIES 14.29 UTILITIES 68.11 UTILITIES 35.08 UTILITIES 7.55 UTILITIES 25,95 UTILITIES 259.93 UTILITIES 21.49 UTILITIES 278.81 UTILITIES 10.86 UTILITIES 347.61 UTILITIES 201.18 UTILITIES 298.14 UTILITIES 76.41 UTILITIES 17.30 UTILITIES 105.07 5,711.71 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 6.11 RING BINDERS - CITIZEN ACADEMY 59.34 INDEX DIVIDERS-CITIZEN ACADEMY 23.56 89.01 REIMBURSEMENT-MILEAGE 85.12 85.12 SATELLITE SERVICE 311.30 7 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 08/06/99 16:55 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION SATELLITE SERVICE SATELLITE SERVICE 45204 08/10/99 691800 OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS HOSE COUPLING SET 4 X 100' HOSE 45205 08/10/99 700325 PCLINK.COM LINK 150 INTERNET -3 MO PREPAY 45206 08/10/99 700663 PAGING NETWORK OF MINNESOTA PAGERS AUG PAGER SERVICE AUG PAGER SERVICE 45207 08/10/99 700665 PAIN ENTERPRISES, INC. EQUIP LEASE 12/98 EQUIP LEASE 1/99 EQUIP LEASE 2/99 EQUIP LEASE 3/99 45208 08/10/99 712100 PITNEY BOWES INC. RESET CHARGES 45209 08/10/99 712260 POOLSIDE GRATE GRATES FOR POOL 45210 08/10/99 730390 QQEST SERVICE COMPANY. L.C. QQEST MAINT 12 MO SERV AGREE 45211 08/10/99 740800 RADIO SHACK BATTERIES 45212 08/10/99 741200 RAINBOW FOODS COOKIES & NAPKINS SHEET CAKES - RECEPTION POP FOR COUNCIL /MGR WORKSHOPS CAMP ADVENTURE SUPPLIES 45213 08/10/99 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY - PRRREV JUNE 1999 COMPUTER USAGE JUNE 1999 COMPUTER USAGE JUNE 1999 COMPUTER USAGE POSTAL VERIFICATION CARDS RESOLUTION & VAR FILINGS W /CTY 45214 08/10/99 742760 RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING CO INC POLICE DOG SUPPLIES POLICE DOG SUPPLIES 45215 08/10/99 750500 REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL & LUBE CAR WASHES CAR WASHES CAR WASHES CAR WASHES 45216 08/10/99 750550 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS MDSE. FOR RESALE MDSE. FOR RESALE NACHO CHEESE SAUCE RELISH,NACHO SAUCE,PRETZEL,FRA 45217 08/10/99 761300 ROADRUNNER 2 HOUR DELIVERY FEES ITEM AMOUNT 186.30 50.65 349.75 452.00 44.85 295.78 3.95 103.59 42.60 42.60 42.60 42.60 19.00 70.24 95.21 205.00 36.34 59.26 79.98 21.24 22.95 16.23 3.76 841.34 89.52 102.00 186.85 154.95 22.62 167.18 22.62 74.78 389.03 389.03 84.32 370.80 13.25 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 548.25 801.75 44.85 403.32 170.40 19.00 165.45 205.00 36.34 183.43 1,052.85 341.80 287.20 1,233.18 13.25 8 VOUCHRE2 08/06/99 16:55 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 9 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT r 45218 08/10/99 762208 ROTHHAMMER INTERNATIONAL DSE F INC. . . OR RESALE 209.93 209.93 45219 08/10/99 770802 RYDER BUS COMPANY FEE FOR FIELD TRIP 120.00 120.00 45220 08/10/99 780298 S &S WORLDWIDE PROGRAM SUPPLIES 117.67 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13.46 131.13 45221 08/10/99 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE 11.36 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 1.77 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 111.21 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 73.94 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 105.19 303.47 45222 08/10/99 780600 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT MDSE FOR RESALE -SNACK BAR 622.26 MDSE. FOR RESALE 306.19 GATERADE,WATER 121.92 CANDY,CHIPS,CRACKERS 100.19 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13.81 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 7.73 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3.18 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 7.42 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 11.69 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 12.07 1 45223 08/10/99 820505 SMITH, SANDY REIMBURSEMENT - MILEAGE 6.72 REIMBURSEMENT - MILEAGE 7.28 14.00 45224 08/10/99 830240 SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEMS NAILS,NAIL MARKERS 24.60 24.60 45225 08/10/99 831400 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC. 2500 9 1/4 FLYERS 1,906.35 1 45226 08/10/99 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF MEDIC SUPPLIES 3,044.38 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 1 4,138.98 45227 08/10/99 842300 STAR SUPPLY PLUMBING PARTS 157.17 157.17 45228 08/10/99 850340 SUMMIT INSPECTIONS ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS 31425.60 25.60 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS 4,282.00 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS 4 3 45229 08/10/99 850395 SUNRAY B -T -B WIX FILTERS 45.66 45.66 45230 08/10/99 850668 SUPERIOR FORD 2 -1999 FORD CROWN VIC SQUADS 20 759.00 1 -1999 FORD CROWN VIC SQUAD 20,759.00 41,518.00 45231 08/10/99 850674 SUPERIOR SERVICES APRIL 1999 RECYCLING 15,962.32 MAY 1999 RECYCLING 14,313.20 JUNE 1999 RECYCLING 15,104.32 45,379.84 45232 08/10/99 860305 T.J.T. - SHIRTS SWEATSHIRTS & TEESHIRTS 404.60 404.60 E VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 10 08/06/99 16:55 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 45233 08/10/99 860630 TALIANO'S MDSE FOR RESALE -SNACK BAR 765.00 765.00 45234 08/10/99 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA A/R BATTERIES 7.66 CALCULATORS 19.15 POLOROID FILM 140.52 POLOROID FILM 70.26- 97.07 45235 08/10/99 860690 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J. REIMBURSEMENT- PROGRAM SUPPLIES 26.37 26.37 45236 08/10/99 860691 TAUBMAN, KEVIN ENTERTAINMENT -MSNC 100.00 100.00 45237 08/10/99 880440 TRANSPORTATION COMPONENTS CO. M/C LAMPS 17.38 17.38 45238 08/10/99 881700 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. RPR GARAGE DOOR-PD 209.58 RPR TO STAT 1 DOOR 140.78 350.36 45239 08/10/99 882830 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVE TOW FOR M1 85.20 TOW FOR M1 95.85 181.05 45240 08/10/99 890053 U.S. DIARY MTHLY PLANNING GUIDE 325.67 325.67 45241 08/10/99 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED WATERPROOF BOOT 73.75 73.75 45242 08/10/99 910500 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL TRASH REMOVAL AUG 354.47 TRASH REMOVAL AUG 242.35 TRASH REMOVAL AUG 537.94 1 45243 08/10/99 911350 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY BULBS 121.41 FUSES 69.76 DIGITAL METER 61.90 253.07 45244 08/10/99 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P. PLUMBING INSPECTIONS 610.00 PLUMBING INSPECTIONS 650.00 PLUMBING INSPECTIONS 650.00- 610.00 45245 08/10/99 940583 WESTLING, TOM TENNIS LESSONS 472.50 472.50 45246 08/10/99 941675 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES, INC. GREEN BAR PAPER 300.84 300.84 45247 08/10/99 970800 YOUNGREN, JAMES CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 106.98 106.98 TOTAL CHECKS 295,447.96 10 11 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 08/12/99 14:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 8018 08/09/99 341706 HERITAGE BANK SAVINGS BONDS 7/23 & 8/6 450.00 450.00 8019 08/09/99 114061 CAREFREE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD 90% OF TIF 1ST HALF 99 48 48 8020 08/09/99 114061 CAREFREE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD 100% OF TIF 1ST HALF 99 10 10 8021 08/09/99 114061 CAREFREE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD 100% OF TIF 1ST HALF 99 12 12 8022 08/10/99 210273 DON MARTY'S LANDSCAPING SUBGRADE PATHWAY /ADD ROCK 5 5. 8023 08/10/99 722200 P.E.R.A. PERA 8/6/99 14 PERA 8/6/99 18,570.77 33,282.97 8024 08/11/99 890900 U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 59.68 TELEPHONE 57.51 TELEPHONE 59.68 TELEPHONE 72.56 249.43 8025 08/12/99 010463 A T & T LONG DISTANCE PHONE 247.76 PERSONAL CALLS 17.46 265.22 45250 08/1`7/99 LISA JOSLIN REFUND - HORSEBACK CAMP 100.00 100.00 45251 08/17/99 JANETTE CAPEDER REFUND-YTH SOCCER 35.00 35.00 45252 08/17/99 REGINA TURNING REFUND - KARATE 21.00 21.00 45253 08/17/99 DANLI LEE REFUND - KARATE 21.00 21.00 45254 08/17/99 KARYN GAFFANEY REFUND-KARATE 21.00 21.00 45255 08/17/99 MINN DEPT OF HUMAN RESOURCES REFUND -DUP PMT 99005565 249.46 249.46 45256 08/17/99 RODNEY ANDERSON DUPLICATE PMT 99011181 72.82 72.82 45257 08/17/99 020150 AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 130.57 130.57 45258 08/17/99 020405 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL MEDICAL OXYGEN 246.94 MEDICAL OXYGEN 37.99 284.93 45259 08/17/99 020411 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE TELEPHONE 38.05 38.05 45260 08/17/99 020870 ALLIED MEDICAL ACCTS CONTROL COLLECTION FEES 29.00 29.00 45261 08/17/99 020950 ALPHA BITS MSNC ENTERTAINMENT 340.00 340.00 45262 08/17/99 021190 AMERICAN DESIGNER CLASSICS GRADING-2563 OAKRIDGE CT 1 GRADING -2563 OAKRIDGE CT 30.96 1 45263 08/17/99 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MATS 15.98 15.98 11 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 08/12/99 14:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 45264 08/17/99 030420 ANDERSON, EVERETT A MILEAGE 46.20 46.20 45265 08/17/99 031100 APPEARANCE PLUS CAR WASH CAR WASHES 12.50 12.50 45266 08/17/99 041005 ARDEN SHOREVIEW ANIMAL HOSP K9 VET SERVICES 67.89 67.89 45267 08/17/99 061700 BATTERIES PLUS BATTERY 35.13 35.13 45268 08/17/99 061906 BAUER BUILT SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 61.31 FIREHAWK,TRAILER PARTS 222.46 283.77 45269 08/17/99 081250 BRAD RAGAN INC. INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES 744.31 744.31 45270 08/17/99 090720 BROADWAY PARTY RENTAL RENT EQUIPMENT 95.85 95.85 45271 08/17/99 090795 ,BROCK WHITE COMPANY, LLC. DEFLECTOR CHAIN ASSY 82.15 V -BELT 61.90 144.05 45272 08/17/99 101500 BURNETT, BETH & MORLEY EQUIP REPAIR-RADIO 70.00 70.00 45273 08/17/99 110150 C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES FEES FOR SERVICE 50.00 50.00 45274 08/17/99 110160 CWH RESEARCH, INC. POLICE TESTING 1,001.00 1,001.00 45275 08/17/99 130246 CHEMSEAL, INC. ASPHALT SEALING- MCKNIGHT TRAIL 2,000.00 2 45276 08/17/99 150190 COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONST. CO. FUEL DISPENSER WORK Y2K 1 REPAIRS TO FUEL ISLAND 56.35 REPAIR SIREN #11 140.87 1 45277 08/17/99 170240 CURTIS 1000 A/P & PAYROLL CHECKS 595.99 A/P & PAYROLL CHECKS 602.74 1 45278 08/17/99 180800 DALCO SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 10.00 TOWELS,TISSUE,CHEMICALS,LINERS 357.32 DRIVE BELT 28.00 VIPER VAC 509.86 905.18 45279 08/17/99 180990 DANNER LANDSCAPING & SALES PUSH MOWER 195.64 PUSH MOWER 216.94 412.58 45280 08/17/99 181852 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE CUT KEYS & LOCK SUPPLY 52.37 52.37 45281 08/17/99 190200 DEPT OF COMMERCE NOTARY -J CHLEBECK 40.00 40.00 45282 08/17/99 200860 DISTRICT COURT NOTARY REG -J SVENDSEN 25.00 25.00 45283 08/17/99 220205 DYNAMIC SOLUTIONS GROUP INC. REPLACE SERVER DRIVE 60.00 60.00 45284 08/17/99 240150 ELSMORE AQUATIC GOGGLES /SWIM CAPS 127.37 127.37 12 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 08/12/99 14:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 45285 08/17/99 240380 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH, INC REPAIR LIGHTS 51.40 51.40 45286 08/17/99 260255 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY FUEL REGULATOR 61.73 61.73 45287 08/17/99 260290 FARMER BROS. CO. COFFEE /COFFEE SUPPLIES 350.48 350.48 45288 - 08/17/99 280820 FRANNSEN, MARY ANN MSNC ENTERTAINMENT 100.00 100.00 45289 08/17/99 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS 5.19 MATS 49.60 JANITORIAL 14.91 UNIFORMS 176.75 MATS 24.00 JANITORIAL 46.26 CREDIT 90.00 - UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 85.50 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 74.13 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 38.71 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 25.07 450.12 45290 08/17/99 301660 GENERATOR SPECIALTY CO., INC. ALTERNATOR REPAIR KIT 167.30 167.30 45291 08/17/99 310150 GONYEA HOMES GRADING -1298 MYRTLE ST N 1 GRADING -1298 MYRTLE ST N 130.96 GRADING -1018 SEXTANT AVE 1 GRADING -1018 SEXTANT AVE 56.03 GRADING -2488 CYPRESS ST 1 GRADING -2488 CYPRESS ST 56.03 GRADING-2428 ARLINGTON AVE 1 GRADING-2428 ARLINGTON AVE 39.45 GRADING-1017 DEMONT AVE 1 GRADING -1017 DEMONT AVE 26.58 5 45292 08/17/99 310710 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. JULY SERVICE 491.75 491.75 45293 08/17/99 320266 GRAINGER DEHUMIDIFIER - COPY RM 169.34 169.34 45294 08/17/99 320300 GREEN VALUE NURSERY SPRUCE /COLORADO 495.00 495.00 45295 08/17/99 320520 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT FILTERS 6.92 6.92 45296 08/17/99 340110 HEJNY RENTALS, INC HELIUM 76.68 76.68 45297 08/17/99 341720 HERO'S SPORTS BAR & BOWL ADMISSION FOR CAMPERS 50.00 50.00 45298 08/17/99 350940 HOME DEPOT /GECF WEED WHIP LINE 23.14 PIPE,ADAPTERS,CEMENT 7.54 30.68 45299 08/17/99 351320 HORWATH, THOMAS TREE INSPECTIONS 1 1 45300 08/17/99 351610 HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY FEASIBILITY STUDY-LIFT #9 3 3 13 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 08/12/99 14:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 45301 08/17/99 380470 I.P.M.A. MEMBERSHIP DUES 100.00 100.00 45302 08/17/99 380819 IOS CAPITAL COPIER LEASE 252.71 COPIER LEASE 63.18 315.89 45303 08/17/99 410370 KATH COMPANIES 6999 GAS UNLEADED FUEL 6 6 45304 08/17/99 420150 KINKO'S CUSTOMER ADM SERVICES 2000 PROPOSED BUDGET BOOKS 816.84 816.84 45305 08/17/99 430970 KRECH'S BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. HP LJ4 REPAIR 85.00 HP LJ5 MAINT 85.00 170.00 45306 08/17/99 450481 LANDMARK, INC. GRADING -2418 ARLINGTON AVE 1 GRADING -2418 ARLINGTON AVE 35.07 1 45307 08/17/99 470700 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS EMPLOYMENT ADS 477.60 477.60 45308 08/17/99 501220 MACDONALD & MACK ARCHITECTS LT ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 1 1 45309 08/17/99 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BDAY CAKES 27.50 27.50 45310 08/17/99 511600 MASYS CORP SEPT 99 SOFTWARE MAINT 970.50 970.50 45311 08/17/99 530560 MERIT CHEVROLET SEAL KITS 26.11 2 COVERS 13.27 39.38 45312 08/17/99 540175 MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. MDSE. FOR RESALE 406.25 406.25 45313 08/17/99 542200 3M SIGNS & SIGNALS 2,148.25 SIGNS & SIGNALS 222.85 SIGNS & SIGNALS 211.47 SIGNS & SIGNALS 759.13 3 45314 08/17/99 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO FLATBED SCAN ONTO CD 21.30 21.30 45315 08/17/99 550100 MN /S.C.I.A. TUITION -DUNN 140.00 140.00 45316 08/17/99 661600 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO. AIR HOSE 20.22 20.22 45317 08/17/99 691160 ON SITE SANITATION SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 111.30 SANITATION 111.30 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.65 14 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 08/12/99 14:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.00 SANITATION 75.65 SANITATION 58.06 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 55.65 SANITATION 7.94 1,254.00 45318 08/17/99 700870 PARAGON BUSINESS SYSTEMS SERVICE 8/15 -9/14 99.69 99.69 45319 08/17/99 712105 PIZZA HUT PIZZA FOR 2 EVENTS 204.48 204.48 45320 08/17/99 720595 POST BOARD POST LICENSE- BUSACK 90.00 90.00 45321 08/17/99 720765 PREFERRED BUILDERS GRADING-2290 KINGSTON AVE 8 GRADING -2290 KINGSTON AVE 76.19 GRADING -2290 KINGSTON AVE 1 GRADING-2290 KINGSTON AVE 48.22 9 45322'- 08/17/99 741200 RAINBOW FOODS CONEY BUNS 11.28 11.28 45323 08/17/99 742110 REGIONS HOSPITAL MEDIC SUPLIES 830.83 830.83 45324 08/17/99 750550 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS MDSE. FOR RESALE 346.39 346.39 45325 08/17/99 761300 ROADRUNNER COURIER SERVICE 10.90 10.90 45326 08/17/99 761360 RON DAVIDSON CONSTRUCTION GRADING-1552 BROOKS AVE 1 GRADING -1552 BROOKS AVE 26.30 1 45327 08/17/99 762685 RUTTGER'S SUGAR LAKE LODGE LODGING MPELRA -LE 196.01 196.01 45328 - 08/17/99 770800 RYCO SUPPLY CO. PAPER TOWELS 30.19 30.19 45329 08/17/99 770802 RYDER BUS COMPANY FEE FOR BUS TRIP 234.00 234.00 45330 08/17/99 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE 35.38 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 63.54 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 2.79 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 98.98 200.69 45331 08/17/99 820460 SLABA, JACLEE NNO FACE PAINTING 50.00 50.00 45332 08/17/99 840203 ST. CROIX LESSON CENTER GROUP LESSONS 1,700.00 1,700.00 45333 08/17/99 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF MEDIC SUPPLIES 736.86 736.86 45334 08/17/99 840651 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS EMPLOYMENT ADS 300.52 EMPLOYMENT ADS 280.83 15 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 08/12/99 14:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT ADVERTISING 131.40 712.75 45335 08/17/99 841100 ST.PAUL STAMP WORKS NOTARY STAMP 22.47 22.47 45336 08/17/99 842303 STAR TRIBUNE EMPLOYMENT ADS 972.00 972.00 45337 08/17/99 842495 STATE CHEMICAL MFG. CO. PEN OIL 126.17 126.17 45338 08/17/99 850395 SUNRAY B -T -B INVENTORY -WIX 37.86 37.86 45339 08/17/99 850668 SUPERIOR FORD 2 -1999 FORD CROWN VIC SQUADS 20,759.00 20 45340 08/17/99 851575 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC. WRI'TEABLE CD ROM 16.29 ZIP DISKS 181.05 197.34 45341 08/17/99 860080 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC BITUMINOUS MATERIALS 1,380.60 1,380.60 45342 08/17/99 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA A/R CAMP SUPPLIES 51.09 ..WATER,`JUGS,CANDY 23.61 CAMP SUPPLIES 32.63 FRAME,FILM,ART PAD 49.99 WALKER,TEETHER,FAN 59.91 BAGS,WATER TOYS 59.61 POP,STONES 9.59 286.43 45343 08/17/99 860691 TAUBMAN, KEVIN FACE PAINTING 100.00 100.00 45344 08/17/99 861659 THE INSTITUTE FOR FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAM- WENZEL 325.00 325.00 45345 08/17/99 871600 TOUSLEY FORD, INC. RELAY PARTS 9.80 RELAY PARTS 29.39 39.19 45346 08/17/99 900173 UNITED HOSPITAL PRE - EMPLOYMENT SCREENING 112.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT SCREENING 224.00 336.00 45347 08/17/99 900200 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE RETURN TESTING MATERIALS /DOC. 119.25 119.25 45348 08/17/99 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P. COMM'L PLUMBING INSPECTIONS 490.00 COMM'L PLUMBING INSPECTIONS 612.50 COMM'L PLUMBING INSPECTIONS 612.50- 490.00 45349 08/17/99 931860 WASTE MANAGEMENT TRASH- WAKEFIELD 160.89 TRASH - HARVEST 160.89 TRASH-AFTON 160.89 TRASH -CITY ROLLOFF 173.88 TRASH -4 SEASONS 1 1 45350 08/17/99 943609 WOODDALE SKATING ADMISSIONS FOR CAMPERS 100.00 100.00 45351 08/17/99 960450 XEROX CORPORATION DUPLICATING 7/99 9.43 DUPLICATING 7/99 97.19 16 VOUCHRE2 08/12/99 14:09 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 ITEM DESCRIPTION DUPLICATING 7/99 DUPLICATING 7/99 TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AMOUNT 28.52 84.25 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 219.39 196,136.83 17 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 ALLENSPACH , SHERRY 330,65 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 ANDERSON , CAROLE J 513 .3 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 DEHN , DEBORAH 1520628 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 CARLE,JEANETTE E 1414.56 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 JAGOE,CAROL 1463.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 OLSON,SANDRA 910.17 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 ALDRIDGE,MARK 1977.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 BOHL , JOHN C 2 0 5 8.0 5 DIRECT DE POSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 FLOR ,TIMOTHY 2 2 0 8.4 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 KVAM ,DAVID 2 8 6 9.8 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 EVERSON , PAUL 1836,00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 FRAS ER , JOHN 2 2 6 9.8 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 O SWALD , ERI CK D 15 4 0.2 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 DUCHARME , JOHN 1711,48 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 P ECK D ENN I S L 18 5 8. 6 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 GREW— HAYMAN,JANET M 669.16 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 EKSTRAND,THOMAS G 1871.48 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 ROBERTS , KENNETH 19 7 0.18 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 TAYLOR ,KATHERINE 2 4 9. 6 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J 2 0 61.15 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 EDGE, DOUGLAS 1512o28 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 LIVINGSTON JOYCE L 8 3 3 .9 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 KNAUSS,PETER 885.88 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 PALMA, STEVEN 2281.44 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 JOHNSON, KEVIN 1972 .83 if:3 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME ---------- -- Now ------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- DIRECT DEPOSIT ---- - - - - -- 08/06/99 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA A DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 ROS SBACH , GEORGE DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 LUT Z ,DAVID P DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 SCHLINGMAN PAUL , DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 FARR,DIANE M DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 VORWERK,ROBERT E DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 NAGEL,BRYAN DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 HELLE,KERRY DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 CARVER,NICHOLAS N DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 OSTER , ANDREA J DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 ANDREWS , SCOTT A DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 RUNNING , ROBERT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 SAVAGEAU, STEPHEN D DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 BARTEL, DENISE DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 CARLSON , DALE DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 MARTINSON,CAROL F DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 HIEBERT,STEVEN DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 DUNN ,ALICE DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 CORNER, AMY L DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 HORSNELL, JUDITH A DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 S E EG ER , GERALD F DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 MOREHEAD ,JESSICA R DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 BELDE,STANLEY DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 ATKINS,KATHERINE DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 FRY , PATRI CIA AMOUNT 2244.74 375.73 1540.28 1774.43 220.78 2189.22 1540.28 2234.68 1837.88 1500.28 2271.57 1470.68 1350.68 39.00 330.65 1760.01 2556.35 2770.44 129.50 920.03 378.26 88.80 1882.43 1114.55 1440.28 19 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 RENSLOW , RITA DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 BAKKE , LONN A DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 BOWMAN ,RICK A DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 KOPPEN , MARVIN DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 CHRISTENSEN, JODIE D DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 KITTRIDGE,KEVIN L DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 WASH,MATTHEW G DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 PIKE, GARY K DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 ICKES, SHERI DIRECT DEP OSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 HEINZ, STEPHEN J DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 NELSON , JEAN .DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 KELLY ,LISA DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 TET ZLAFF , JUDY A DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 URBANSKI , HOLLY S DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 ZWI EG , SUSAN C. -- DIRECT - - DEPOSIT 08/06/99 BAUMAN,GAYLE L DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 SMITH,CASSANDRA L DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 SKRYPEK , JOSHUA L . DIRE CT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 HERBERT ,MICHAEL J DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 STOCKTON , DERRELL T DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 MELANDER , JON A DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 RO S SMAN ,DAVID A DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 THOMAS- JR,STEVEN DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 PRIEBE,WILLIAM DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRE C T DEPOSIT 08/06/99 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 179.78 1660.03 2117.85 330.65 770.15 330.65 20.10 1642.12 1201.88 1972.83 893.72 928.78 917.56 1296.28 1473.08 2036.43 1349.76 814.07 2017.79 1972.83 2063.23 2586.44 1512.28 2147.67 1593.89 20 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 154 0. 2 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 RABBETT , KEVIN 2 3 7 9.7 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 GRAF ,MICHAEL 1116.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN 1747954 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 CARLSON, THERESE 1643.97 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 LE,SHERYL 3046.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 FAUST,DANIEL F 3431.16 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 KELSEY,CONNIE L 802916 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 GUILFOILE,KAREN E 2072.39 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 POWELL, PHILIP 1649.78 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 WINGER, DONALD S 3103,31 -- - DIRECT- DEPOSIT 08/06/99 BAN I CK , JOHN J 2 419.01 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 BECKER, RONALD D 2 6 0.13 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 KARIS, FLINT D 2464.77 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 STEFFEN, SCOTT L 3392.09 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 THOMALLA,DAVID J 2419.01 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 YOUNGREN,JAMES 2283.83 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06f99 BERGERON,JOSEPH A 2298976 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 HAI DER, KENNETH G 3 515.71 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 PRIEFER,WILLIAM 1769963 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 KANE ,MICHAEL R 2 0 7 4 .4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT -__ -- 0 8/ 0 6/ 9 9 LUND S TEN , LANCE 2306,90 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 CAVETT CHRISTOPHER M 2248903 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 ANDERSON,BRUCE 3005.42 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 MARUSKA,MARK A 2074.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 21 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 HUTCHINSON, ANN E DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 COLEMAN, MELINDA DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 CROS SON , LINDA DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 EASTMAN, THOMAS E DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 STAPLES,PAULINE DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 HURLEY,STEPHEN DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 GERVAIS— JR,CLARENCE N DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 HALWEG ,KEVIN R DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 OTI S , MARY ELLEN M DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 CASARE Z, G INA DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 MEYER, GERALD W DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 PARSONS , KURT G DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 JUNG, STEPHANIE J DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 MARUSKA , ERI CA DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 NORDQUIST,RICHARD DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 JACKSON , MARY L D IRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA A DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 ROBB INS , AUDRA L DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 LUKIN , STEVEN J DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 OLSON ,JULIE S DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 SWANSON , LYLE DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 BREHEIM ROGER W DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/06/99 LARSON,DANIEL J 73377 08/06/99 IVERSON,JEANIE 73381 08/06/99 ERICSON,MICHAEL A AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 1729.63 3063.89 1581.63 2070.26 2331.62 2130.46 .167 3.68 2249.45 710.76 687.88 1596.28 1355.80 1242.55 134.40 1535.48 1201.88 1107.24 1251.83 2365.95 1366.55 1491.38 1625.17 1209063 230.00 2329.62 22 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT � ww "a "w "m 73382 � "m M ft� 08/06/99 ww �w wm � � � .wA � ONO �w amv. �w mm MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A 4065.17 73383 08/06/99 HECKER,JERALD N 65900 73384 08/06/99 CUDE,LARRY J 380.30 73385 08/06/99 DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J 236.83 73386 08/06/99 EDSON,KAREN L 760900 73387 08/06/99 JACKSON,KIMBERLY A 741.00 73388 08/06/99 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 416.00 73389 08/06/99 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 1583.82 73390 08/06/99 JOHNSON,BONNIE 873.52 73391 08/06/99 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1415.48 73392 08/06/99 PALANK,MARY KAY 1747.67 73393 08/06/99 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1587.28 73394 08/06/99 RYAN,MICHAEL 2804.06 73395 08/06/99 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1609.25 73396 08/06/99 BARTZ,PAUL 2464.68 73397 08/06/99 KNEFELKAMP,KARI L 397950 73398 08/06/99 KONG,TOMMY T 836.28 73399 08/06/99 RUSH,SAMUEL E 40.00 73400 08/06/99 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 1720.81 7340. 08/06/99 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 2040.21 73402 0 8/ 06 / 9 9 WAT C Z AK , LAURA 217.6.19 73403 08/06/99 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 2292.19 73404 08/06/99 HALE,THOMAS M 1590.42 73405 08/06/99 MEEHAN,JAMES 2397.95 73406 08/06/99 THIENES,PAUL 1972.83 23 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME wwMrw .�wrwww`�wwwwwwww�www�rwwww AMOUNT wwwwwwwwwwwwww www�rw.rrwwwwaww 73407 w�wwwwwww�w 08/06/99 ww. HEWITT,JOEL A 2769.40 73408 08/06/99 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1554.68 73409 08/06/99 CHRISTENSEN,DANIEL G 720.00 7 3410 08/06/99 FREEERG,RONALD L 1568.28 73411 08/06/99 JONES,DONALD R 1313.75 73412 08/06/99 WESTERHAUS, KEVIN M 720.00 73413 08/06/99 CORWIN,ERIC B 708.75 73414 08/06/99 ELIAS,JAMES G 1858.68 73415 08/06/99 KUNO,MICHAEL R 942.38 73416 08/06/99 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 1807.71 73417 08/06/99 ANDERSON,ROBERT S 1540.28 73418 08/06/99 CASAREZ,SCOTT J 536.25 73419 08/06/99 EDSON,DAVID B 1581928 73420 08/06/99 FENGER,JUS'T'IN R 598.50 73421 08/06/99 HELEY,ROLAND B 1568.28 73422 08/06/99 HINNENKAMP,GARY 1553.32 73423 08/06/99 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 1512.28 73424 08/06/99 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 1544928 73425 08/06/99 NAUGHTON,JOHN W 635.50 73426 08/06/99 PATTERSON,TERRILL T 756.00 73427 08/06/99 POSSERT,RYAN 909.00 73428 08/06/99 RASMUSSEN,TIMOTHY J 909.00 73429 08/06/99 MACY,RITA 126.75 73430 08/06/99 MCCUSKER,ELIZABETH A MANNING 214963 73431 08/06/99 SOUTTER,CHRISTINE 26.81 24 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE w wi EMPLOYEE NAME 73432 .0m w w w "m now w� 08/06/99 THOMPSON,DEBRA J 73433 0 8/ 0 6/ 9 9 WEGWERTH ,JUDI'T'H A 73434 08/06/99 ANDERSONEVERETT 73435 08/06/99 OLSON,ARNOLD G 73436 08/06/99 OSTROM,MARJORIE 73437 08/06/99 WENGER,ROBER'T' J 73438 08/06/99 BALLESTRAZZE,THAD M 73439 08/06/99 BUSMAN,CHR.ISTINA M 73440 08/06/99 DICKSON,WARREN C. 73441 08/06/99 FEUCHT,KENNETH 73442 08/06/99 FINN,GREGORY S 73443 08/06/99 FLUG,ELAINE R 73444 08/06/99 FLUG,MEGAN L 73445 08/06/99 FRANK,LAURA 73446 08/06/99 GEBHARD,JILLIAN R 73447 08/06/99 NIEMCZYK,BRIAN N 73448 08/06/99 NORGAARD,BETHANY J 73449 08/06/99 NORMAN,KENDALL A 73450 08/06/99 PETERSON,ROSEANN E 73451 08/06/99 PREW,JOHN M 73452 08/06/99 PRIEFER,BRIAN 73453 08/06/99 SANDHOLM,ANDREW J 73454 08/06/99 STIEN,KARIN M 73455 08/06/99 ZIELINSKI,JOSEPH R 73456 08/06/99 GERMAIN,DAVID AMOUNT 480.75 1473.08 191.62 640,00 2150.43 1825.88 430.35 346.50 116.00 117.00 1272.83 542.03 652.88 396.00 201.00 165.00 168.00 297.50 399.00 419.25 258.75 48.00 45.60 11.00 1624.49 25 AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 720.35 2074.43 1351.48 519.72 208.00 771.81 943.09 609.37 727.51 325.00 133.95 1156.83 429.07 626.87 392.50 68.48 79.80 276.25 522.47 436.79 266.60 481.01 41.10 244.80 120.25 26 CI'T'Y OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME rr r w- omr r r w r ww ri. 73457 08/06/99 LI'T'TLE,WAYNE B 73458 08/06/99 NADEAU,EDWARD A 73459 08/06/99 SCHULTZ,SCOTT M 73460 08/06/99 COONS,MELISSA 73461 08/06/99 ERICKSON,KYLE F 73462 08/06/99 GLASS,JEAN 73463 08/06/99 HOIUM,SHEILA 73464 08/06/99 HORWATH,RONALD J 73465 08/06/99 KARAS,TAMARA A 73466 08/06/99 KEELING,SARAH B 73467 08/06/99 NEAMY,MARK W 73468 08/06/99 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 73469 08/06/99 SCHOEBERL,KAYLENE M 73470 08/06/99 SHOBERG,CARY J 73471 08/06/99 ABRAHAMSON,BRYAN K 73472 08/06/99 ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L. 73473 08/06/99 ANDERSON,JULIE M 73474 08/06/99 ANDERSON,TIMOTHY R 73475 08/06/99 BA.DEN,MA'T'HIAS 73476 08/06/99 BITTNER,KATIE C 73477 08/06/99 BU'T'LER, SARAH E 73478 08/06/99 CHAPMAN,JENNY A 73479 08/06/99 CONLIN,PAMELA 73480 08/06/99 COOPER,JOSEPH W 73481 08/06/99 DAMROW,KELLY C AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 720.35 2074.43 1351.48 519.72 208.00 771.81 943.09 609.37 727.51 325.00 133.95 1156.83 429.07 626.87 392.50 68.48 79.80 276.25 522.47 436.79 266.60 481.01 41.10 244.80 120.25 26 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 73482 08/06/99 DEMPSEY,BETH M 73483 08/06/99 DeGRAW,KRYSTAL M 73484 08/06/99 ERICKSON,CAROL A 73485 08/06/99 FONTAINE,ANTHONY 73486 08/06/99 FREEMAN,LAURA A 73487 08/06/99 FRETZ,SARAH J 7.3488 08/06/99 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 73489 08/06/99 HAGGERTY,KATHRYN A 73490 08/06/99 HAGSTROM,LINDSEY S 73491 08/06/99 HAWKE,RYAN A 73492 08/06/99 HAWKINS,LISA A 73493 08/06/99 HEDLUND,LAUR,EL R 73494 08/06/99 HEINN,REBECCA L 73495 08/06/99 HOLMGREN,LEAH M 73496 08/06/99 HOULE,DENISE L 73497 08/06/99 HUPPERT,ERIN M 73498 08/06/99 IKHAML,JOHN 73499 08/06/99 IVERSON,BRADLEY A 73500 08/06/99 JENSEN,SUSAN K 73501 08/06/99 JOHNSON,MEGAN M 73502 08/06/99 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 73503 08/06/99 JOHNSON,ROLLAND H 73504 08/06/99 JOHNSON,STETSON 73505 08/06/99 KERSCHNER,JJOLENE M 73506 08/06/99 KOEHNEN,AMY AMOUNT 124.15 448.68 40.00 112.56 198.25 271.38 41.7.4 15.00 148.50 451.21 96.25 184.25 553.30 394.80 166.05 523.35 635.30 48.75 94.25 273.00 430.40 143.00 13.50 245.38 54.00 27 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 73507 08/06/99 KOEHNEN,MARY B 349.36 73508 08/06/99 KOEPKE,CHARLES E 247.00 73509 08/06/99 MALONE,BRANDON M 156.00 73510 08/06/99 MOTZ,ERIN M 358.45 73511 08/06/99 O'REAGAN,CHRISTINE 60.00 73512 08/06/99 PEHOSKI,JOEL T 198.25 73513 08/06/99 POWER,S,JESSICA 22.50 73514 08/06/99 REGESTER, DOUG 40.00 73515 08/06/99 SACKMANN,LAURA C 485.50 73516 08/06/99 °SCHLUETER,LOUISE E 37.00 73517 08/06/99 SCHROEDER,KARI B 143.00 73518 08/06/99 SHAFFER,SUSAN A 48.75 73519 08/06/99 SHERRILL,MASON D 530.59 73520 08/06/99 SIMONSON,JUSTIN M 648.49 73521 08/06/99 SMITLEY,SHA.RON L 188.00 73522 08/06/99 SONTAG,NICHOLAS D 211.20 73523 08/06/99 STEINKE,JACOB P 143.00 73524 08/06/99 SWANER,JESSICA 252.45 73525 08/06/99 TIBODEAU,HEATHER J 559.59 73526 08/06/99 WARNER,CAROLYN 176.70 73527 08/06/99 WEDES,CARYL H 185.50 73528 08/06/99 WHITE, TIMO`T'HY M 144.10 73529 08/06/99 WILLIAMS,KELLY M 767.40 73530 08/06/99 WOODMAN,ALICE E 191.15 73531 08/06/99 ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L 188.50 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE CROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 73532 08/06/99 BOSLEY,CAROL 96.90 73533 08/06/99 DISKERUD,HEATHER A 88.40 73534 08/06/99 GLASS,GILLIAN 45.20 73535 08/06/99 HANSEN,ANNA K 42900 73536 08/06/99 KOHOUTEK L 58.50 73537 08/06/99 LYNCH,KATHARINE R 45.00 73538 08/06/99 PRICE,JENNIFER L 29.25 73539 08/06/99 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 160.00 73540 08/06/99 SHERRILL,CAITLIN A 208.50 73541 08/06/99 SPANGLER,EDNA. E 98.05 73542 08/06/99 ANTON,SARAH E 189000 73543 08/06/99 BEHAN,JAMES 1301.88 73544 08/06/99 BLAKESLEY,JEFFRY D 128,00 73545 08/06/99 BLANCHARD,KEVIN J 42900 73546 08/06/99 CALLEN,KATIE E 97.65 73547 08/06/99 CHAPEAU,GREG M 151.20 73548 08/06/99 FULLER,AMY R 94.50 73549 08/06/99 GRENDZINSKI,DIANE J 82.50 73550 08/06/99 HEMPFER,NICHOLAS W 91.25 73551 08/06/99 JAHN,DAVID J 1372.83 73552 08/06/99 KOSKI,JOHN F 826.86 73553 08/06/99 KYRK,BREANNA K 240.48 73554 08/06/99 LONETTI,JAMES F 605.65 73555 08/06/99 MATTESON, FRANK M 157.50 73556 08/06/99 MORIN,TROY J 174.00 29 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE �.._.mme �m ftm EMPLOYEE NAME .*0," ft.. w"".— _._�— Now - --- --- --- -mm - - - - - -- AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 73557 "m �mmom 08/06/99 ON* PRINS,KELLY M 217935 73558 08/06/99 REILLY,MICHAEL R 674.72 73559 08/06/99 SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M 204.91 73560 08/06/99 STEINHORST,JEFFREY 313.98 73561 08/06/99 SWANSON,VERONICA 1035.88 73562 08/06/99 YOUNG,DILLON J 270960 73563 08/06/99 AICHELE,CRAIG J 949.34 73564 08/06/99 MULVANEY,DENNIS M 1713.08 73565 08/06/99 PRIEM, STEVEN A. 1400.76 317158.50 30 AGENDA ITEM TO: City Manager FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: AGENDA REPORT Xodi logo Assistant City Engineer Rs.Q Acceptance of Project 97 -16, Harvester Avenue and Sterling Street Improvements August 16, 1999 The contract with OptiCon, Inc. for the construction of the Harvester Avenue and Sterling Street Improvements has been completed. Staff is prepared to make the final payment to the contractor and to release any remaining retainage. Attached is the final pay estimate. The final contract amount is $607,864.26. Below are the revised cost and finance estimates. Revised Proiect Costs: Final Contract Amount City & County Signing & Striping Easements /Land Acquistions Subtotal Construction Costs +31.5% Eng., Admin., Legal, & Fiscal Total Project Cost Revised Financing: $607, 864.25 State Aid $557 5 Assessments 266,450.00 28,000.00 Sewer Utility Fund 19,450.00 $640 $842 201,899-74 $842,851.40 Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution accepting Project 97 -16, and approve the release of the final payment and retaina a to Y 9 OptiCon, Inc. in the amount of $2,7'18.94. CIVIC jt Attachment RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that Harvester Avenue and Sterling Street Improvements, City Project 97 -16, is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 97 -16 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of an retains a or escrow is Y Y g hereby. authorized. HARVESTER AVENUE (STILLWATER RD TO CENTURY AVENUE) (HARVESTER AVE TO STILLWATER ROAD) PROJECT 97 -16 PROJECT PAYMENT REQUEST ESTIMATE NO. FINAL CONTRACTOR: OPTICON, INC. PERIOD ENDING: 8 -2 -99 CONTRACT AMOUNT: $565,706.59 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT EST. N. QDL. QTY. TO DATE UNIT PRICE TOTAL 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) 2101.501 CLEARING (POND & CHANNEL) 2101.502 CLEARING (STREET) 2101.506 GRUBBING (POND & CHANNEL) 2101.507 GRUBBING (STREET) 2104.501 REMOVE CMP OR RCP STORM SEWER PIPE 2104.501 REMOVE CMP OR RCP PIPE CULVERT 2104.503 REMOVE I CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT /APRON/ SIDEWALK LS ha TREE ha TREE m m m2 1.00 0.20 36.00 0.20 36.00 36.50 24.00 479.50 1 0.2 53 0.2 44 11 51.6 623.71 $23,255.00 $7,000.00 $80.00 $6,000.00 $60.00 $16.50 $16.50 $6.40 $23,255.00 $1,400.00 4 2 $ 40.00 1 200 $ .00 $2,640.00 181. $ 50 851.4 $ 0 $3,991.74 2104.503 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 2104.503 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 2104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT /SIDEWALK 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 2104.521 SALVAGE WOOD RAIL FENCE, RESIDENTIAL 2104.521 SALVAGE WOODEN FENCE, RESIDENTIAL 2104.521 SALVAGE CHAIN LINK FENCE 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION, (P) (EV) (STREET) 2105.511 COMMON CHANNEL EXCAVATION, (P) (EV) 2105.515 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION, (P) (EV) (POND) 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW, LV 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM 2130.501 WATER 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5, 100 % CRUSHED (GRAVEL DRIVES) m2 m2 EA m m m m m m3 m3 m3 m3 m3 HR m3 t 560.00 861.00 3.00 106.00 164.00 16.00 21.00 30.00 4265.00 190.00 1970.00 110.00 1600.00 28.00 148.00 23.00 560 824.84 3 9.1 273.89 16 24.05 22 4608 190 1970 901 477 17 244.9 29.98 $3.60 $5.40 $300.00 $10.00 $9.00 $20.00 $30.00 $15.00 $9.00 $7.14 $7.48 $13.42 $8.00 $75.00 $13.00 $20.00 $2,016.00 $41454.14 $900.00 $91.00 $2,465.01 $320.00 $721.50 330 $ .00 $41,472.00 $1,356.60 $141735.60 $12,091.42 $3,816.00 $1,275.00 $3183.70 $599.60 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 6 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (40 mm) 2331.603 BITUMINOUS JOINT SAWING 2340.508 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (41 WEA50055PG 58 -28) t m2 m t 5380.00 50.00 939.00 1185.00 6611.93 0 1006 1153.69 $8.70 $57,523.79 $15.00 $0.00 $3.50 $3 $26.85 $30,976.58 2340.514 TYPE 32 BASE COURSE MIXTURE (32BBB50000PG58 -28) t 1490.00 1532.82 $25.45 $39,010.27 2340.518 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS t 81.00 114.88 $35.00 $4,020.80 2340.518 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR TRAILS 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 2501.515 600 mm (24 ") RC PIPE APRON WITH SAFETY GRATE 2501.515 675 mm (27 ") RC PIPE APRON WITH SAFETY GRATE 2501.515 750 mm (30 ") RC PIPE APRON WITH SAFETY GRATE t L EA EA EA 50.00 2957.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 48.52 2460.54 1 1 1 $35.00 $1,698.20 $0.30 $738.16 $1,344.00 $1 $1,114.00 $1,114.00 $1,185.00 $1,185.00 FINAL.WK4 HARVESTER AVE - PROJECT 97-16 PAGE 1 • 2501.515 900 mm (36 1 f) RC PIPE APRON WITH SAFETY GRATE EA 1.00 1 $1,719.00 2503.511 300 mm (12 ") CORR. HDPE PIPE SEWER (SMOOTH) m 44.00 154 $65.86 $11719.00 10 14 $ 2.44 2503.511 525 mm (21' CORR. HDPE PIPE SEWER (SMOOTH) m 58.70 47.6 $74.30 $3 2503.511 600 mm (24 ") CORR. HDPE PIPE SEWER (SMOOTH) m 58.60 58.6 $74.30 $4,353.98 2503.541 300 mm (12 ") RC PIPE SEWER, DES 3006, CLASS V m 141.00 156.6 $94.03 $14,725.10 2503.541 375 mm (15 ") RC PIPE SEWER, DES 3006, CLASS V m 239.10 240.7 $89.99 $21,660.59 2503.541 450 mm (18 ") RC PIPE SEWER, DES 3006, CLASS III m 275.00 274 $75.29 $20,629.46 2503.541 525 mm (21") RC PIPE SEWER, DES 3006, CLASS III m 98.90 98.9 $79.99 $7,911.01 2503.541 600 mm (24 ") RC PIPE SEWER, DES 3006, CLASS III m 95.50 99.5 $119.43 $11,883.29 2503.541 675 mm (27 ") RC PIPE SEWER, DES 3006, CLASS III m 5.00 10.5 $216.40 $2,272.20 2503.541 750 mm (30 ") RC PIPE SEWER, DES 3006, CLASS III m 19.40 19.4 $144.02 $2,793.99 2503.541 900 mm (36 ") RC PIPE SEWER, DES 3006, CLASS III m 24.10 24.1 $174.38 $4,202.56 2503.602 200 MMX150 mm (8 "X6 ") PVC SCHEDULE 40 WYE (REPLACE VCP WYE) EA 2.00 2 $709.00 $1,418.00 2503.602 CONNECT TO 150 mm (6") VCP WYE WITH NEW 150 mm (6 ") PVC EA 2.00 2 $600.00 $1,200.00 2503.603. SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION, TELEVISING m 1070.00 1513.03 3 $ .28 $4,962.74 2503.603 200 mm (8 ") VCP SEWER PIPE (VCP MAIN REPLACEMENT w/ VCP) m 18.40 17.23 $386.10 $6,652.50 2503.603 200 mm (8 ") PVC SEWER PIPE (VCP MAIN REPLACEMENT w/ PVC) m 2.80 8.4 $436.92 $3,670.13 2503.603 150 mm (61 PVC SCHEDULE 40 SERVICE m 102.00 127.73 $72.81 $9,300.02 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX, WATER EA 18.00 23 $150.00 $3,450.00 2504.602 ADJUST CURB STOP BOX EA 34.00 40 $90.00 $3,600.00 2504.602 F & I CURB BOX SINGLE LID COVER EA 3.00 2 $100.00 $200.00 2504.602 WATER UTILITY HOLE EXCAVATION EA 4.00 15 $460.00 $6,900.00 2504.602 REPAIR VALVE BOX, WATER EA 2.00 0 $290.00 $0.00 2504.602 REPAIR CURB STOP BOX EA 10.00 3 $218.00 $654.00 2504.603 WATER UTILITY TRENCH EXCAVATION m 79.00 311.42 $24.96 $7,773.04 2504.604 50 MM (2 ") POLYSTYRENE INSULATION m2 114.00 222.57 $12.00 $2,670.84 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, BOX CB W /R- 3067 -V EA 10.00 10 $961.00 $9,610.00 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, 675 mm (21 ") CB W/ R -4342 EA 1.00 2 $833.00 $1,666.00 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, 1200 mm (48 CB W/ R- 3067 -V EA 13.00 13 $1,267.00 $16,471.00 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, 1500 mm (60') CB W/ R- 3067 -V EA 2.00 2 $2,095.00 $4,190.00 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, 1800 mm (72 CB W/ R- 3067 -V EA 2.00 2 $2 $5,688.00 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, 1200 mm (48 ") MH, SPECIAL DESIGN W/ R- 5901 -F EA 1.00 1 $3,595.00 $3,595.00 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, 1200 mm (48 ") MH W/R -1422 -0004 & 2422 -0009 LID EA 9.00 8 $2,119.00 $16,952.00 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, 1500 mm (60 MH W /R- 1422 -0004 & 2422 -0009 LID EA 2.00 2 $1,607.00 $3,214.00 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EA 13.00 13 $185.00 $2,405.00 2506.603 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE, 1200 mm (48 ") MH m 5.00 5 $590.00 $2,950.00 2511.501 RANDOM RIPRAP, CLASS IV m3 45.00 43 $72.00 $3,096.00 2511.515 GEOTEXTILE FILTER, TYPE IV m2 65.00 98 $2.00 $196.00 2521.501 100 mm (4 ") CONCRETE WALK m2 14.00 33.14 $36.00 $1 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, DESIGN 8618 m 2140.00 2122.65 $20.25 $42,983.66 2531.507 150 mm (6 ") CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, RESIDENTIAL m2 435.50 690.35 $36.05 $24 FINAL.WK4 HARVESTER AVE - PROJECT 97 -16 PAGE 2 2540.602 REINSTALL SALVAGED MAILBOX SUPPORT EA 14.00 43 $50.00 $2 2540.602 FURNISH & INSTALL MAILBOX SUPPORT EA 31.00 10 $50.00 $500.00 2557.603 INSTALL WOOD RAIL FENCE (SALVAGED) m 16.00 19.05 $50.00 $952.50 2557.603 INSTALL WOODEN FENCE (SALVAGED) m 21.00 0 $60.00 $0.00 2557.603 INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE (SALVAGED) m 30.00 22 $50.00 $1,100.00 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.00 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 2565.602 ADJUST HANDHOLE EA 1.00 1 $700.00 $700.00 2565.602 NMC LOOP DETECTOR 1.7 m X 1.7 m EA 3.00 3 $800.00 $2,400.00 2573.501 BALE CHECK EA 30.00 23 $15.00 $345.00 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE PREASSEMBLED m 230.00 99 $8.20 $811.80 2573.602 ROCK ENTRANCE PAD EA 10.00 0 $1,000.00 $0.00 2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN m2 8550.00 7203.78 $2.00 $14,407.56 2575.532 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER, ANALYSIS 10 -10 -10 kg 210.00 170 $1.00 $170.00 2575.555 TURF ESTABLISHMENT (POND & CHANNEL AREAS) LS 1.00 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 2575.601 EROSION CONTROL, CONTRACTOR'S PLAN (1% N) LS 1.00 1 5 $ ,730.00 $5,730.00 TOTAL $604,364.26 Original contract amount Plus Change Order No. 1 Plus Change Order No. 2 Revised contract amount Total earned to date Less .0% retainage Plus incentives (change order no. 1) Less liquidated damages Subtotal Less previous payments Amount due this payment Contractor Engineer: Date: $565,706.59 $3,500.00 $39,638.35 $608,844-94 $604 $0.00 $3,500.00 $0.00 $607 &nr%C 7 AC "10'1 Date: 8-/G -99 FI NAL. WK4 HARVESTER AVE - PROJECT 97 -16 PAGE 3 Agenda item G MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Community Design Review Board Membership Requests DATE: August 9, 1999 INTRODUCTION Action by Coun . , 12. H arz e ..,�. Modif Dot There are two applicants for the two vacancies on the community design- review board (CDRB ). Their names are Jon J. LaCasse and Craig Jorgenson.. J have enclosed their applications for your review. BACKGROUND On July 27, 1999, the CDRB recommended that the city council appoint both applicants for board membership. The positions available were vacated by Mary Erickson who resigned on April 13, 1999 and Marie Robinson who resigned on July 27, 1999. Made's term expires on January 1, 2000. Marv's term expires on January 1, 2001. 1 r DISCUSSION Mr. Jorgenson is also running for city council. In the event he is elected, the city council should appoint him to the remainder of Marie Robinson's term which would expire at the end of this year. RECOMMENDATION Appoint Craig Jorgenson to complete the community design review board term vacated by Marie Robinson which would expire on January 1, 2000 and appoint Jon J. LaCasse -to complete the community design review board term vacated by Mary Erickson which would expire on January 1, 2001. c:templcdrb.int (6.2) Attachments: 1. Jon J. LaCasse CDRB Membership Application 2. Craig Jorgenson CDRB Membership Application JUL y lyyy a; 43Am rurt AbbUI,lA1tb iNU NV 5653 P. 1/1 CITY OF Attachment 1 MAPLEWOOD 130ARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM NAME L� L AC?bFZES$ J 49 O P ATLA G S7,8 EE E k.6o p ZIP S"S /D &.d. PHONE NO. Works GS'l -Gya�9 00 GS /- S� DATE 7 --G - I q � y how -long have you lived In - the Ctt of Y Maplewood? N7 2) Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes � N Cortmments: - 3} On which srd or Commission era ou in ' Y interested in se�rin�? (please check De$i n hk � �ommunit Y g. Review 19oerd mark & Recreation Comm ission .,� Housing & Redevelopment Authority —..� Planning Comt�lssioR _ Human Relations _Ccm -mlan , �.,._ �'ofice - Service Commission 4) Do you have anys areas of interes wi� t thin this Board's or Commission's scop responsibilities,? . 4 VeAlz 6'XP�'6'Wccr 2>1Z, jFr//44 F e�� - e, Z ps of respons�b�i�cfeS? �� T� � V h c.. � 1 rrJ S ioe.zgW4 xno wt 6' e; gpjl.,Pme *45-sSjx1e,1;rY ADD ZOW4' e4,Ddr k)aA .9ir -14 r01Z G);IY VOF s - - -- — S) -- List .other- or.ganizations - clubs- ln-th -C . Community �n which you have been or ere - an active ' k jij� ,4 1 , p or ���. A sfewrdAm4 026AAii ArioAl participant: 6) WhY would you like to serve on this Board or—Commission? 05e /YJ �/ JWE,tES7' i4ND �kiGf //V AI r6 7& ,QC 7b S6.Q !/e' A Y ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: 100e 6 • THE 1NFQRMA7t0N CONTAINED 11N 7N1$ APPLlCA 7*/o c1 SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC, 009V0Z4' XUJ UW QOOM31duW : Q I M60 66/90/L 2 1 b - 1 Z7 Z7 Liu . Kj ZINI' i r MLA " I L_ nr%% G Un l 1L M%.Wnllt =t' i t t o �' -,�,,� : Attachment 2 NAME R o q lt 7 o AL • ADDRESS �� - ZlP S3 PHONE Na. W6rk DATE w 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? f" ' 2) Will other commitments make regular attendancd at meetings difficult? Yes _�, No ' • ' rt Corr�m 2 ix a �w e�.�c �r. ents. l - tz ar t 3) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving?: (please check) vommunity Design Review Board Park & Recreation Commission housing & Redevelopment Authority Planning Commission uman Relations Commission Police Civil Service Commission 4) Do you h any - - s ecific areas of interest within .this Board's or Commission's scopo of responsibilities? � Q� -"V;,r7MW404n�2.1 p4tr 4V a lso ^L ,: 5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are al active participant: #uL � i j B) Why would Y ou like to serve on this Board or Commissi0n? H, i� 2 i • amt -r..b i o 4 AL b 79 4co 9.*baAwo"9 Arx Ll 2 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. , , (2 41 i wfic w . r - - - - -- V THE WFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASSIFIED; AS PUBLIC. , F�5�8R08GG�J�P1. ,ow 3 TOTAL P.02 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JULY 27, 1999 - IX. STAFF PRESENTATIONS A. CDRB Membership Interviews -- Applicants: James Cownie and Craig Jorgenson Secretary Tom Ekstrand said that James Cownie withdrew his application because he is a candidate for city council and wanted to focus on that. Craig Jorgenson, another review board candidate, is also running for city council. Jon LaCasse also applied and would like to be considered for the board. He was present at the meeting and a copy of his application was given to the board members. Craig Jorgenson was interviewed first by the board. He said he has been a Maplewood resident for 7 years and is an instructor for medical assistants and laboratory technicians at Lakeland Medical Dental Academy. Mr. Jorgenson said he likes the community of Maplewood and has a personal interest in nature and "lots of green things." The board members reviewed the time commitment required. This -.d -id not present a problem for Mr. Jorgenson and he had no questions of the board. Mr. Ekstrand said the term would either - -- - - - -- - expire at the first of next year or the year 2001. Jon LaCasse said he has worked as an architectural drafter for about nine years. He expressed a preference for "not too crowded spaces, good landscaping, quality architecture vs. _ industrial- type.. buildings." Chairperson Ledvina outlined the obligations of the design review board members. Mr. LaCasse thought this sounded reasonable. The consensus of the board was that both applicants were "valid." Boardmember Robinson though this might be a good time to offer her resignation from the board. Boardmember Shankar commented on the enthusiasm of Mr. LaCasse to apply for the board after only having lived in Maplewood for seven months and, in contrast, another type of enthusiasm from someone who has lived here for seven years and found things that need to be changed. Boardmember Robinson would like to take the "thinking of applicant one" and the experience of applicant two and put them together. She thought this would really complement the design review board. Ms. Robinson said, after being on the board for nine years, she was sincere and thought the presence of these two good applicants would be a good time for her resignation. Mr. Shankar felt the second applicant had valid experience in some -fields but the first applicant appeared to "have a little bit more passion, especially in landscaping." Boardmember Johnson preferred Mr. Jorgenson. Mr. Ledvina agreed. Secretary Ekstrand thought both were good candidates but agreed with the other board members about Mr. Jorgenson's "passion." Ms. Robinson was willing to remain on the board, if they met in two weeks, until the new members started. Chairperson Ledvinda suggested that a recommendation be made to appoint Mr. Jorgenson to the board at this time and then ask Mr. LaCasse if he would be interested in the event the other position opened at the end of the year. Ms. Robinson said she would not be staying on the board until the end of the year. She felt the open position that expires in 2001 should be offered to Mr. Jorgenson and Mr. LaCasse would get the other position that expires the first of next year. Ms. Robinson said she would officially be resigning when she knew the applicants would be going to the city council meeting. Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes of 07 -27 -99 Boardmember Robinson moved the Community Design Review Board accept both applicants. In order to simplify the process, Ms. Robinson said she was resigning from the review board effective this date, July 27, 1999. Boardmember Johnson seconded. Ayes all The motion passed. AGENDA ITEM Additional Information AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager RE: Approval of Appointments to Community Design Review Board DATE: August 23, 1999 INTRODUCTION At its Pre- Agenda meeting on Thursday, August 19, 1999, the Maplewood City Council interviewed two candidates for the vacancies on the Community Design Review Board. The two - candidates were Jon LaCasse and Craig Jorgenson. ._BACKGROUND The two vacancies on the Community Design Review Board were due to the resignation of Mary Erickson on April 13, 1999 and Marie Robinson who resigned on July 27, 1999. Marie's term expires on January 1, 2000 and Marv's term expires on January 1, 2001. Ballots were distributed to the council and the results of the voting ranked Jon LaCasse as the first candidate and Craig Jorgenson ranked as the number two candidate. RECOMMENDATION The city council should approve the appointment of Jon LaCasse to fill the vacancy of Mary Erickson and Craig Jorgenson to fill the vacancy of Marie Robinson on the Community Design Review Board. Agenda Item G' AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Michael McGuire 6,4) From: Chief of Police Donald Wingere. Subject: Donation Date August 9, 1999 Introduction Aotion by Council *odiffe,,d ,., Re�ecte�_ Data The. Maplewood Police Department_ Reserve Program has received a $400 donation from the Ramsey County Agricultural Society. Background For the past several years, the Maplewood Police Reserves have assisted with the Ramsey County Fair and Parade by providing traffic control and patrolling the.fairgrounds. To show their appreciation, the Ramsey County Agricultural Society has made a donation to the Reserves and asked that the donation be used to purchase equipment for the Reserve program. Recommendation It is recommended that approval be given to accept this donation and the money be used to purchase equipment for the Maplewood Police Reserves. Action Required Submit to the City Council for review and approval. DSW: j s MEMORANDUM TO: Mike McGuire FROM: Karen Guilfoile DATE: August 16, 1999 RE: Certification of Election Judges Acti by Council R nd ®rse J Rej, Da ta —.�. The following resolution needs to be adopted for certification of the list of Election Judges for the September 14, 1999 Primary Election. 99- 08 -XXX CERTIFICATION OF ELECTION JUDGES RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of Election Judges for the 1999 Primary Election, being held on Tuesday, September 14, 1999: PRECINCT NO. 1 PRECINCT NO.6 PRECINCT NO. 12 Marvella Lackner Joan Button Lucille Cahanes, Chair Audrey Duellman Rachel Olson Evelyn Skluzacek Joan Kolasa Mary Ann Franssen Don Jungmann Louise Nieters John Henry Larry Schaaf Margaret Kunde PRECINCT NO.2 PRECINCT NO.7 Phyllis Pauley Milo Thompson, Chair Debbie Dotson Joseph Kolasa Myrna Schultz PRECINCT NO. 13 Don Schroepfer Ron Kockelman Anne Fosburgh, Chair Jacqueline Hayne Joyce Tangen Diane Golaski Harriet Schroepfer Gail Liedl Mary Lou Lieder Barbara Johnson Mark Gilstaad Elizabeth Olson PRECINCT NO. 8 Donna Brown Jacque Phillippi Katie Belatti Deloris Hohenthaner PRECINCT NO. 14 PRECINCT NO.3 Gerald Behm Shirley Luttrell, Chair Pat Thompson, Chair Jeanette Bunde Carol Berger Jaime Belland Helen King Jean Dickson PRECINCT NO.9 Anita Larson Barbara Gallagher Ernest Payette Marian'Salo Katherine Mollers PRECINCT NO. 15 Lorraine Petschel Richard Lofgren, Chair PRECINCT NO.4 Bernice Del Monte Joan Bartelt Fred DuCharme, Chair Grace Locke Delores Fitzgerald Grace Dornfeld Ted Haas Margaret DuCharme PRECINCT NO. 10 Elaine Rudeen Lorraine Rosauer Betty Haas, Chair Lorraine Lauren John Willy Jean Petroski Joan Cottrell PRECINCT NO. 16 PRECINCT NO.5 Lilliam Yekaldo Mildred Iversen Cecilia Tucker D. Franklin Tolbert Marviette Shaffer Thema Ling Clarence Shaffer Virginia Dehen PRECINCT NO. 11 Anna Marie Breidenstein Betty Eddy Lorraine Fischer, Chair Gayle Wasmundt Rita Fredrickson Carol Berthiaume Joan Carr Mary Fischer Betty Mossong Agenda Item GS Agen da Item Glo_ AGENDA REPORT TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cl RE: Temporary Gambling License -Holy Redeemer Parrish Action by Counei2: �n�ersec��� Yoditi e�� Dat DATE: August 16, 1999 e Holy Redeemer Parrish has submitted an application fora gambling license to be used at Holy Redeemer Church on October 10, 1999 at 2555 Hazelwood Avenue. B ack ground Previously, temporary gambling licenses have been issued over the counter. In issuin g these licenses It has not been prior practice to conduct investigations on temporary permits. Temporary one -day gambling permits are approved by the city council I recommend approving the application for t=pDxaq gambling license to Mounds Park Academy. AGENDA NO. �' �� AGENDA REPORT TO: Mike McGuire, City Ma FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Ci DATE: August 16, 1999 RE • Action by Councfl: 0ndo _. use t Temporary Strong Beer and Wine License for Church of Saint Jerome The Church of Saint Jerome, with a listed address of 749 Skillman Avenue East has submitted an application for a tempmjq one day strong beer and wine license to be used at their fall festival that will be held on the church and school grounds on September 19 1999. The he proceeds will be used to supplement the parish and school funds. Background City Code directs that temporary one-day strong beer and wine licenses Y g es be approved by the City Council. In issuing these licenses it has not been prior practice to conduct investigations p , tigations on temporary permits. Recommendation It is recommended to approve the application for a temporary one day strong beer p rY Y g and wine license to the Church of Saint Jerome. 9 : i � A g enda t MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Waldorf School Road B Ea '� LOCATION: 70 County J' tY East °unQ11 DATE: August 12, 1999 mod` Re j ecte INTRODUCTION , Project Description The Minnesota Waldorf School is proposing to build a school campus f Bar s' P or grades K through 8 on the former Hideaway s it e at 70 County Road B East. The intent is to create a reen natural landscape where education about plant communities, g . P ties, ecological systems, gardens and weather is integrated into the overall learning experience developed within the school a "garden village" community. The applicant is proposing 9 g design for the campus buildings. The village s would be single story and organized around buildings la yards and lea g 9 p lay y learning gardens. Refer to the maps on p ages and the applicant's letters on pages 15-16 and the building levations attachment). 9 (separate The applicant submitted a revised site plan on August 5 1999. This revised es to the building g � v�sed plan shows some changes ilding configurations and parking lot but overall is concep tually the same P Y me as the previous drawings. Please refer to the letter and _site plan . revisions on pages 18-19. Requests 1. A comprehensive land use plan change from BC (business commercial) to S (school). Refer to the maps on pages 11 -12. 2. A CUP (conditional use permit) for a school. The code only allows schools by CUP. Refer to the letter on page 16. 3. Approval of site, architectural and landscape plans. DISCUSSION Comprehensive Land Use Plan Change g Maplewood does not have any specific criteria fora app roving land use a should b � PP 9 plan _.changes. Any such change e consistent with the goals and policies of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan comprehensive Ian has P ' The land use plan in the com P p s eleven overall land use goals for coordinating - - - -- - - - --- - overall development in the city. Of these, four apply to this ro'ect. The P 1 y i nclude: • Preserving significant natural features where practical • Minimizing land planned for streets • Preventing premature use, overcrowding or overuse of land • Integrating developments with open space areas, community facilities ' features Y sand significant natural Maplewood also has 17 general development olicies in the land oats. Of the P use plan to carry out the overall land use g se, three specifically apply to this proposal. They include: • The city will not approve new development without rovidin facilities services such as utilities, P g for adequate public and streets, drainage, parks and open space • Grading and site plans should preserve as man significant • Y 9 natural features as possible • The city regulates development near or the alteration of natural storm water run -off ural drainage systems to manage The plan preserves many trees and the small wetland in the • northeast corner of the site. Conditional Use Permit The proposed school meets the city's findings of approval for conditional requires compliance � g PP r a conditional use permit. The code ce q p nce with the comprehensive plan to approve a CUP. The city must first approve the plan change in or council, therefore, g der to grant -the -CUP. Wetland .Buffer The Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District has classified the wetland on proposed 4utlot A as a Class Four Wetland. This classification requires an • q average buffer width of 25 feet with a minimum of 20 feet. The proposed grading plan would meet the wetland buffer requirements. Site Plan Revisions The site plan revisions on page 19 are concep the same • finds either layout acceptable. P Y e as the larger -scale site plan. Staff y Parking There is no specific parking requirement for schools. The applicant feels they are proposing enough parking stalls for the campus. They plan, furthermore t enter into an agreement with the Tri- District school tot he west to use their large parking lot for occasional event play, or sporting event). parking (a If the proposed number of spaces proves to be too few the applicant has room to add more as needed. The city could also require additional arkin at a later process. P 9 date as part of the CUP renewal Trees and Landscaping Maplewood's tree preservation code requires a developer to after P have at least 10 trees per acre on the property they complete grading or construction. For this 8.2 acr site, there should be at least 82 trees left after grading a construction. - The applicant is proposing to lant 92 trees meets and preserve many more. The proposed Ian P p the city code for tree preservation. N The proposed landscaping would be very attractive. The rainwater gardens would be functional as well as an esthetic amenity to the site. Staff's only concern is that the Quaking Aspen and River Birches are proposed as ornamental trees with a 1 %2 inch caliper. Ornamental trees may be 1 %2 inches in caliper. Staff feels, however, that are shade trees and should be increased in' size to 2 %2 inches in caliper as the code requires.- Building Design The building elevations look somewhat conceptual - in that they do not elaborate on the materials - -- - - proposed for each building section. The structures, though, look unique and attractive. The applicant should present specific and detailed plans for the building permit that clearly indicate all proposed exterior materials. The applicant told me that the proposed portable, temporary buildings are anticipated to be used until Phase II is built. Staff has no problem with this. DRAINAGE Donald Neely, the abutting property owner to the east along the south side of County Road B, does not want the site to drain into the holding pond in the northeast corner of the site (see Comment 2 on page 6). This pond straddles the lot line and lies on both the Waldorf site and Mr. - -- ------ - - - - -- Neel Y 's- property.-- ro ert Y_ ._ g Y Althou h Mr. -Neel ' s -- lot -is -- not- - buildable - , - - -the -city should not allow the applicant to increase the amount of runoff to this property. The applicant should either obtain an off -site drainage easement for storm drainage onto Mr. Neely's lot, retain storm water on their own property or provide a drainage plan showing that the amount of runoff to this lot will not increase. COMMITTEE ACTIONS July 28, 1999: The community - design review board recommended approval of the plans. - August 2, 1999: The planning commission recommended approval of the plan change and CUP. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 20. This resolution approves a comprehensive land use plan change from BC (business commercial) to S (school) for the proposed Minnesota Waldorf School campus at 70 County Road B East. The city approves this change because: 1. It would be consistent with the goals and policies of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. 2. The site is next to a major collector street and is near two arterial streets. 3. The proposed plans would preserve many significant natural features on the site including a wetland and large trees. 4. There would be no traffic from this development on existing residential streets. B. Adopt the resolution on pages 21 -22. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for a school at 70 County Road B East. The city bases this permit on the findings required by the code and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. If a parking shortage develops, the property owner shall provide more spaces, subject to approval by staff of a revised parking layout. 5. Dedicate a 25 -foot -wide wetland buffer easement around the wetland to the City of Maplewood. B. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling, grading or dumping beyond this point. City-staff shall approve the sign design and location before the contractor installs them. The developer or contractor shall install these signs before the city issues a certificate of occupancy for the first phase of this development. 7. The applicant shall obtain an off -site drainage easement for storm drainage onto the -- abutting neighbor's property adjacent to the northeast corner of the site, retain their storm water on their own property or maintain the existing drainage flow by not increasing the rate of runoff into the pond on the adjacent property. The drainage plan shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. C. Approve the site and landscape plans date - stamped July 8, 1999 and the revised site plan concept date - stamped August 5, 1999 (should the applicant prefer this layout) for the proposed Minnesota Waldorf School campus at 70 County Road B East. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city--has-not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall: a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to the city engineer for approval. b. Revise the landscape plan to increase the size of the Quaking Aspen and River Birch trees to 2 % inches in caliper. C. Obtain an off -site drainage easement for storm drainage onto the abutting neighbor's property adjacent to the northeast corner of the site, retain their storm Ll water on their own property or maintain the existing drainage flow by not increasing the rate of runoff into the pond on the adjacent property. 3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Provide continuous concrete curbing around all proposed parking and drive areas. b. The trash - dumpster screening requirement is waived unless the dumpsters would be visible to the public. In that case, an enclosure shall be provided using the same materials and color as the building. C. An inground lawn- irrigation system shall not be required because of the remote nature of this site. d. Provide site- security lighting as required by the code. The light source, including the lens covering the bulb, shall be concealed so not to cause any nuisance to drivers or neighbors. e. Install handicap parking sign for handicap parking spaces in compliance with ADA requirements. f. Install a stop sign at the exit onto County Road B. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. -- - - b.--- - -- -The city receives -a- cash escrow or- an irrevocable -- letter.. -of -- credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within six weeks if_the. building is occupied in the spring or summer. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may - approve minor changes. - 6. The applicant shall resubmit the building elevations to the community design review board for approval. The applicant shall include the proposed building materials, building colors and samples of materials. CITIZENS' COMMENTS surveyed the 24 property owners within 350 feet of the site. I received four replies. Comments 1. We have spoken with the architect regarding the notation of a "future pedestrian connection to ... school parking." The architect has assured us that this is intended to be a pedestrian connection to the school for the purpose of joint programming, and that they are not relying on our parking lot to satisfy any school parking requirements either new or in the future. We would like information regarding the assessment of park dedication fees or declaration of park easement on the Waldorf School site. (Joint Powers School District No. 6067) 2. It appears these people are planning to use our property on County Road B for their storm water pond. This is unacceptable and illegal. This property is for sale. They turned it down. Legal action could follow. (Refer to the site plan on page 17 that Mr. Neely returned indicating his abutting property.) (Neely, 1927 Spruce Place) 3. We -are -very pleased with the proposed school plans. It certainly will be an improvement over the Hideaway. (Woodbury, 81 E. County Road B) 4. Ensure coordination with the City of Little Canada for utility connections if necessary. (City of Little Canada) 0 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 8.2 acres Existing land use: Hideaway Lounge and parking areas SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Businesses across County Road B South: Tri- District Elementary School property and Sandy Lake across the railroad tracks West: Tri- District Elementary School and the Hilltop Dental Clinic East: Houses across railroad right -of -way PAST ACTIONS - - - - -- - - - -- This site has had a restaurant and bar since at least 1969. The first restaurant here was the Oak Hill Ranch and - Supper Club. February 20, 1975: The city council approved remodeling and expansion plans for the Hideaway Lounge. June 25, 1991: The community design review board (CDRB) approved plans for an outdoor deck. PLANNING -- Land Use Plan designation: BC (business commercial) Zoning: BC ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 36- 437(3) requires a CUP for schools in any zoning district. Section 25 -70 requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed - - developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 7 2. That' the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. CRITERIA FOR CUP APPROVAL Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. See the findings in the resolution on pages 21 -22. CRITERIA FOR PLAN AMENDMENT There are no specific criteria for a land use plan change. Any land use plan change should be consistent with the goals and policies in the city's comprehensive plan. The resolution on page 18 gives findings for approval of a plan amendment. p:secl8/waldorf.2 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Existing Land Use Plan Map 4. Proposed Land Use Plan Map 5. Site Plan 6. Building Elevation Reduction 7. Applicant's statements (two sheets) date - stamped July 8, 1999 8. Donald Neely's Returned Site Plan 9. Applicant's Letter of Site Plan Revisions -and- Revised Site Plan dated August 5, 1999 (two pages) 10. Land Use Plan Amendment Resolution 11. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 12. Plans date- stamped July 8, 1999 (separate attachments) 0 Attachment 1 LITTLE CANADA 49 uu !E RD. COU RD. 8 Mir ;........ :. ........ .... .... M...... _ N..M. ....... ...... CL RIDGE AV .... .................... ...::. :. • i . :.:.N.M NN.N.. .... N... N. ..... ,..... � N...M.M... ...N.N..N ...... N.N....... L ... . • . :.. : ; : :..San N•••N•••• I BELMONT LN .....N.... . .. ..N........ ;;�.. ..L . .:........... ........... ..�.....N.... �i ...... _ ..... ..... AVE. ..... . ... ...:..... N... SKIW�AAN � q) `_ "� IUJAAN AVE. oZ WT. VERNON v �AVE. a o _ .% VERNON W '' "" DOWNS AVE. °.3 W AVE. J ...... .... . > O O Ro..ro�. 26 N W ROSELV AVE. L� V) KELLWOOD AVE. LWO00 26 AVE. � 0 ® ER W S AVE. W FENTON A o m z Z tip - RIPLEY ZM • A Y UJ RI AVE �Z � KINGSTON o AV. G � _ 2 M KINt Z65 J 2 v c pt�` aJ 1 C= W > Z W PRIC LARPE NTEUR AVE. C R T S. - - IFIT LOCATION MAP 4 N Attachment 2 TRI- DISTRICT SCHOOL ( 27.3 c&r- To TitiL d 9 � dop Q, T: Vdoo ST. PAUL WATER 2.86 UTILITY PROPERTY B. or W. C. i PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 10 HIDEAWAY / m' • q , • • 13C NIGHT CLUB /- $*, j �� At �• � / % / A :j 4 N • COUNTY ROAD B HILLTOP DENTAL ( < I � c CLINIC C�) 120 130 140 O 04 - i 20' (-233 �!• t fn a.G. �C 3 O 4 4 S • TRI- DISTRICT SCHOOL ( 27.3 c&r- To TitiL d 9 � dop Q, T: Vdoo ST. PAUL WATER 2.86 UTILITY PROPERTY B. or W. C. i PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 10 HIDEAWAY / m' • q , • • 13C NIGHT CLUB /- $*, j �� At �• � / % / A :j 4 N wow, wow �1 �I II�U:Z�it�111� i II�III1�111111� ; L - - snow iii m mm mm EM C �i ii i Islas Igloo NO MEN n�I1■ PaL4\ 111rnai4r arjeria� 1 1 I I LR_2CMf (� I R - 2(M) o_0,21►.% Intarchaneo Lq 0 k ;_. 0 0 �;� 111 if. f ' = ■� ®iii = =1= ■ ■ i small N it 1� .■... DAM ME m PaL4\ 1 IIFnalgf arierlu� I. LR -2(M) I R -2(M) o - *rul Interchange 1. k lm ON ■ ON ■ ON ■ ■■ i ii ON N No _ 11111IN e .. It ■11 ■11 ■I � ' ;Z�i ■111■ i .. I D.j I.4 Attachment 5 COUNTY ROAD B ..•... - ' .ia.• .w.d �r.:a .. -.v s�..�... ... .... ..•.._: •. ;:;- vi - .. 1 '• .. _. �l. - :a _ ._. ... .. • a' _ . _ _ .... _ .. .. _ - - _ ... r ~- • .t ./: ;. ��•. �+. ra tr.+ T�+r. ....,r.....:.:••.r•.•w�•\r•a�•t •►: r�•.trnv.rvn•rv. •.w�4�•. •... .wr,....::• .w tyi sic- gTow WATER poome vw PLAY YAM re PUAWOM , , I v HIV... /' r , r I �I• !:. ' j � _� �• , •,, . 1 • � j :, • 1 + ` / >: .,- _ /MIS � ,� it • a�:. 1 � �'� I � ' i , • , R \ � \'t l ',,: ! � w . - ,..'�-•� �: ` t .- •`'i:• � \ 1 o , , t j ' ••1 � � \ • t f00 + � t t' • . ! . '• \.. MME= . , i vMTM JI : Or11 HC w^ _ ! y. rl i i .1 , • T 4 • .\ to Oancr li ii '''• � 'i '�'„ , a L� ' -_ •• � t� :�•'� wt► � I ` 1 � - i _ 0- 1' !1lTt/E TOTIFi►ATE ! ' .� r' r ` .s ^� - . ,' .�hL : ►IIIiO114M�P , } MM r1!I PAW WATIM Pam V"Tept _p1W ROOM ' ' M• i • - 11; �•" ' '. ! NATHI 1 Hoor lo • r v_ + "�'••�,. 1100112 `� . • �, '� 1 ,. ; , r ;. FOOT/ 1 / ' . •` 011tX ! 1 1 1 I i I f t t ' I ON= r r (' I i podowl- 1 1 1 � PORfA� •1 M.1,•, •�. y • � / f. , r pP1111Fa1ME 4 ; •jC 11G MAN PLAZA MAY Fftb WATElt • : • 1 � \ .�.. _. {' 1 �;•'..� `� •• .a . � • � r• _. BURY ! EURYTHW / olo AREA WAGE • S 11® - 1 . . • O1IENLOOK PLAY GROUND it t ► \ j / j i ? MOON 6 1 MOON • / ' �4' •�' ., /• � .J� l ..' .. :1•. '! � Off/ NKRE 1 FORTAHLES I ily SITE PLAN 13 4 N To] U -N a O r HAFT s M I Nlc, X 0 5 (TYPO) 5 TA to boo rte' 11�i A S FC MI W i f�l � IN4aD STWGco �a•i g1 p wC, (Typ) AC,4�NT FU NORTH EAST ELEVATION : M AIN BUIL DING : ONE STORY 0 Z 0 0 u C Z O r o � ACc O C3 IL o uu 4c cc OtRXU(r Attachment 7 c c u L4 The Waldorf Campus is being designed as a garden village. The intent is to create a green, natural landscape where education about plant communities, ecological systems, gardens, and weather are integrated into the overall learning experience developed within the school community. The school facilities are nestled into the landscape much like a provincial hillside village or a midwestern farmstead. The campus will be developed in multiple phases, as funding permits. The majority of the site improvements will occur in the initial phase, with additional classrooms and gymnasium structures to be added in future phases. The character of this first phase will be maintained in future phases. The campus slowly reveals itself as one passes along the gently sloping drive through a canopy of mature oak trees and carpet of woodland perennials. "Car parks" are located to reflect the need for convenience and safety and the desire to experience the landscape after leaving one's car. Village buildings are single story, organized around - play - - yards - and -- lea rning gardens. Storm water follows a natural progression from building tops and car parks across the landscape through a series of rainwater gardens vegetated with native plants where water will infiltrate and be cleansed before reaching a restored wetland. Pedestrian pathways will follow the flows of the landscape. Natural and local construction materials such as stone, wood and clay will be combined in ways to reflect a midwestern landscape. The structures will also reflect a natural farmstead. The roofs shall be a combination of metal for the central spaces and asphalt shingles for the classroom wings and kindergarten building. The exterior walls shall be wood siding (ship lap or board and batten) with stucco as an accent material. Fenestration includes clerestory, entry area, corridor and classroom windows. Color palette shall be subtle varieties of earth related hues. Mechanical and other equipment shall be screened from view. It is the intention and desire of RRT and the Minnesota Waldorf School to continue to work with the City's review process as the design progresses. • �'M fir-. FZ� 1� d JUL 1999 ea ,; 15 RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON ARCHITECTS 253 EAST 4TH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -1632 TEL: 612 224 -4831 FAX: 612 228 -0264 An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity Employer Melinda Coleman Community Development Director City of Maplewood 1830 County Road B East Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Letter of Introduction for Conditional Use Application The Minnesota Waldorf School (MWS) is a non - profit educational organization that has operated a private school in various locations in the Twin Cities for the last eighteen years. MWS is part of an association of schools based upon the work of Rudolf Steiner at the beginning of the 20 century. The mission of MWS is to bring forth and support a child - centered approach to education. MWS offers a comprehensive K -8 education that enables our students to stand as . confident, compassion and competent individuals in our contemporary world. MWS provides a curriculum that addresses the needs of the whole human being - body, soul, mind, and spirit - in a developmentally appropriate manner. Presently, the MWS community is comprised of 142 students in grades 1 -8, and 38 students in two Kindergarten classes supported by a faculty and staff of 26 persons. _ MWS is currently located in the educational building of the Corpus Christi Catholic Church at the intersection of _ Fairview and County Road B in Roseville. The lease between Corpus Christi and MWS expires as of June 2000. As ` part of a site search process, MWS has identified the Hideaway location as a viable site meeting the criteria adopted by MWS for location of a permanent Waldorf school in this area. Attached is a preliminary conceptual site plan for the new MWS at the Hideaway location showing conceptual plans for a K -8 school facility of between 20,000 \ 30,000 sq. ft. The facility is intended to provide for at least 12 classrooms, including up to 3 kindergarten classes and single class rooms for each grade from 1 -8. In addition, the facility ultimately will include both a gymnasium and a library, as well as additional smaller rooms for music, science, dance, art, offices, - meetings and storage. J r Ultimately, the facility would be able to accommodate up to 200 students in grades 1 -8, with as many as 75 students in kindergarten classes. Consistent with a Waldorf educational philosophy, it is not anticipated that there would be more than one classroom for each grade. Should our school be fortunate enough to experience such growth, a splinter school. is typically begun in another location to accommodate growth beyond one class per each grade. The Hideaway site has been selected because it offers a beautiful natural location that can accommodate at least 3 acres of green space for a garden and a playground, in addition to space for adequate parking around the facility. The Hideaway site provides a safe location with relatively convenient freeway access that is not in conflict with our vision for a Waldorf school. - The fact that the Tri- District Environmental Elementary School is located adjacent to the Hideaway site has be an encouraging factor for us in our search. Our vision for a Waldorf school also involves an appreciation and exploration of many of the same experiences relating to nature and educational opportunities in a natural enviro mental setting. The construction of the facility will occur in phases. If approved the construction of the K -8 school facility would begin r in the all of 1999 for occupancy in the Fall of 2000. In the event that we do not have sufficient funding commitments for the entire facility, we would consider the use of modular construction to provide facilities on a temporary basis, or possibly integrating the modular construction with more permanent construction as part of a later phase. As you can appreciate, the costs of a gymnasium will add substantially to the costs of the facility and may also be undertaken in a separate- phase. The Minnesota Waldorf School looks forward to being a part of the Maplewood community. We feel that our parents, students and activities will fit well within this northern suburb, and that we will be able to contribute to the life of the area. We look forward to working with you in this endeavor. Sincerel Sian Owen - Cruise 16 Administrator - LD SCHO,OL INNESO TA QUA ORF 2 129 FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH ROSEVILLE, MN 55 1 13 -5416 (651) 636 -6577 Attachment 8 COUNTY ROAD s _ Palo y •, • • am • • • • tam t • � 1 �, '� •' = � S1 t •!. V � 1 i � •tom • ; y �•:• • -� f� !•. .`S� •' � • \ 1 • t • • • • JAL t ' • •• • • �•� .• • . ' ' • POO DONALD N EELY ' I PROPERTY 1 • ' .� � , � t. : . • • . • • - - • .J •� I • � IL • t gem so "0414A Sam 4 • � MRIM t • oiling • : J �!. • w. • • , . ,,,DO,n r Nam 0 1 1 •' t / I / MAC • • •. •• _ SAKA • ` :: .. wean • •` •' MOM I ( 7 name .. • . • - • Q / DONALD NEELY'S 4' RETURNED SITE PLAN I mom" flow r l 01 PI �: • . , ••� •, ! :"'" '. ,,.wry .� ; .' r • t •. r - - • - ',• C too • .• • •. •a • • V*A MAC • • •. •• _ SAKA • ` :: .. wean • •` •' MOM I ( 7 name .. • . • - • Q / DONALD NEELY'S 4' RETURNED SITE PLAN 612 - 3386838 F A X HOISINGTON KOEGLER To: Tom Ekstrand City of Maplewood 651.770.4506 CC: - Paul stay, R&T Architects From: Bruce Chamberlain oisingto i oegler Group Inc. 123 North 3r Street, Suite 100 Minneapolls, -MN 55401 Voice: 612.338.0800 fax: 6 12.338.5838 RE: Waldorf School Date: 5 August, 1999 769 AUG 05 '99 15: Attachment 9 �G 1 Q AUG G 5 999 •�1 �.._..� l u Ll I �..i 'T'om, I believe you spoke with Paul May regarding some-modifications we would like to mare to the Waldorf site plan. The changes include: + Redesign of the lower parking lot to improve pedestrian circulation, add a few parking stalls, and better integrate parking lot runoff into the rainwater garden system. * Shifting the location of the gym to help balance cut/fill calculations and allow more space for the lower parking lot/rainwater garden. • Modifications to the school footprint to better meet programnu and budget needs. This modification necessitates moving the emergency /service access route closer to the west property line. As you know the building design will go back to the Design - -Review Board so we assume that slight modifications to the building at this stage shouldn't be much of an issue. But, we certainly do not want the modifications to hold up the CUP /rezoning process. Could you provide feedback about whether the suggestions would 1) jeopardize our current application, 2) if not, should we present the modifications at the upcoming Council meeting or wait until after the Council takes action and review the modifications with City Staff? Thanks. Please give me a call when you get a chance. 0 611 Ikk ■ o .'4 WI/ � �- 60 • 1m' o �p O �� ��O - -- 0 OlOIO'OTO:sO' 0-- a 0:0 0.910.6 A 0 g M ��� o �, Cie 00 < o O Y eo `A�o °o'er • • �� o ® Q p00 • AO • o 0 61 W g'4P VEGETATION KEY existin free line existin spedmen tree Proposed shade t" O Proposed wmmwm tree shrubs l 8PKW Plantin mixes 3 U U DESIGN REFINEMENT - AUGUST 10. 1999 R R"T MMXCT 253 EAST 4N srR Sr. PAUL. mofwsau 5510" (851) 22+-4831 (651) 2=-0254 T*W nomommm� OWNER: WMHMOTA wmjxww 90400E MIS CONSULTANTS: = uw r CM I.EZ GROUP w- 2= 111mu U CLCCrICAL 000ESM aLBON & AWDCtA7M t-4— so 63::g XmvrrupAL NNCIN MEYER B GRGMM & joHNN W 0 L fflk *RP M = M low CTM ANCOXM LMDMW ENGINBAWO C(L -j 0 0 X 0 < 11 lllllw co) LL 0 CO) LU 0 z Z vD L<L —j 0 < C 0 < W __j a. 0 w C/) Z w Z z 2 L PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Attachmemt 10 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Minnesota Waldorf School applied for a change to the city's land use plan from BC (business commercial) to S (school); WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located at 70 County Road B East. The legal description is: That part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29, Range 22 bounded and described as follows: Beginning at the North 1/4 comer of Section 18 and running Westerly along the North line of said section 660 feet, more or less, to a point; thence Southerly 650 feet, more or less, to a point, thence Easterly on a line parallel to the North Section line 433.5 feet, more or less, to a point in the West right of way fence of the Minneapolis, Saint Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railway; thence Northeasterly along said right -of -way fence 527 feet, more or less, to a point where said right of way fence intersects the North and South 1/4 section line; thence Northerly along said 1/4 line 180 feet, more or less, to a point of beginning. Subject to public easement in highway, County Road B, on the North side of tract. (PIN 18- 29 -22 -21 -0001) WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On August 2, 1999, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice e - in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the land use plan change. 2. On August 23, 1999, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described change for the following reasons: 1. The proposed changes wou.ld_- _be__consistent with the goals and policies of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. 2. It is next to a major collector street and is near two arterial streets. 3. The proposed plans would preserve many significant natural features on the site - - - -- - -- - -- including a wetland and large trees. 4. There would be no traffic from this development on existing residential streets. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1 1999. 20 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Minnesota Waldorf School is requesting that the Maplewood City Council approve a conditional use permit to build a school on the old Hideaway Lounge property. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 70 County Road B East. The legal description is: That part of the Northeast 114 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 29, Range 22 bounded and described as follows: Beginning -- at - the North 1/4 comer of Section 18 and running Westerly along the North nine of said section 660 feet, more or less, to a point; thence Southerly 650 feet, more or less, to a point, thence Easterly on a line parallel to the North Section line 433.5 feet, more or less, to a point in the West right of way fence of the Minneapolis, Saint Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railway; thence Northeasterly along said right -of -way fence 527 feet, more or less, to a point where said right of way fence intersects the North and South 1/4 section line; thence Northerly along said 1/4 line 180 feet, - more or less, to a point of beginning. Subject to public easement in highway, County Road B, on the North side of tract. (PIN 18- 29 -22 -21 -0001) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On August 2, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this - permit. 2. On August 23, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described XM?4iflMMI MIX IX MMIt P4NUM XH #HX M NH?4 LCOX KIMM' THX ? N.# MPSPSMV1rkV #HiZf PSX"If because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 21 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one -year. 4. If a parking shortage develops, the property owner shall provide more spaces, subject to approval by staff of a revised parking layout. 5. Dedicate a 25- foot -wide wetland buffer easement around the wetland to the City of Maplewood. 6. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling,. grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign design and location before the contractor installs them. - - -- -The developer or contractor- -shall install these - - -- signs before the city issues a certificate of occupancy for the first phase of this development. 7. The applicant shall obtain an off -site drainage easement for storm drainage onto the abutting neighbor's property adjacent to the northeast comer of the site, retain their storm water on their own property or maintain the existing drainage flow by not increasing the rate of runoff - - -- - into the pond on the adja - n# - property: - -- The - drainage plan - shall be - subject to the city engineer's approval. The Maplewood - City Council adopted this resolution on , - 1999. 22 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA AUGUST 2, 1999 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Waldorf .School (70 County Road B) Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. He said it is staff's opinion that the school can meet the city's goals and the policies of the comprehensive plan. Mr. Roberts said the conditional use permit request does meet the city's criteria for approving a conditional use permit. He said that the Community Design Review Board reviewed design requests and recommended approval of the design elements of the plan. Mr. Roberts answered questions from the commissioners. Commissioner Frost said that the report indicates that the applicant has to dedicate the buffered easement around the wetland to the city and asked if they dedicate the wetland also. Staff said it was intended for both. Commissioner Trippler said staff indicated in their report-that the building design proposal lacks specifics on the building materials being used in construction. He asked staff if something should be put in the recommendations to ensure that the building materials are in compliance with what the city is looking at. Staff said the design review board addressed this issue and made a recommendation which will be put in the update that will be sent to the City Council. Commissioner Thompson asked staff if there was a stipulation for hard surface around the building as there was for Edgerton School. Staff the has been discussing this with our fire staff.- Commissioner Rossbach asked if the pond in the northeast corner would be used for drainage. Ken Haider, city engineer, said it was his understanding that the applicant intended to use the northeast corner as the recipient of the drainage. He said that, because the applicant reduced the total impervious area, staff considered the proposal appropriate. He said the .applicant can either keep all the water on site or get an easement or control the property that is adjacent to that wetland. Paul May, with Rafferty Rafferty Tollefson Architects, was present, along with Stuart Nielsen, Don Peacock, and Marjorie Meyer from the Minnesota Waldorf School, and Bruce Chamberlain, landscape architect with Hoisington Koegler Group. Commissioner Rossbach asked the applicant about the drainage for the site. Bruce Chamberlain said it was their understanding from city staff that as long as they either maintain or reduce the overall flow rates from the site onto the wetland that they can allow drainage to enter the wetland without any requirement for drainage easement. He said their intent is to construct a NURP pond outside of the 25 foot buffer of the wetland edge and use that as an additional rate control for all the storm water that is coming off the site which would treat not only quality but rate. Their actual flow rates __would be below what the calculations are showing. them now so they'll be reducing the rate of runoff from the site even more. Mr. Haider said that calculations have to be based on total volume as opposed to rate. Mr. Stuart Nielsen told the commission about the school, its history, type of curriculum, etc. Chairperson Fischer opened the public hearing for comment from the audience. There was no one present who wished to speak so the hearing was closed. Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 08 -02 -99 Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution approving a comprehensive land use plan change from BC (business commercial) to S (school) for the proposed Minnesota Waldorf School campus at 70 E. County Road B. The city approves this change because: 1. It would be consistent with the goals and policies of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. 2. The site is next to a major collector street and is near two arterial streets. 3. The proposed plans would preserve many significant natural features on the site including a wetland and large trees. 4. There would be no traffic from this development on existing residential streets. B. Adoption of the resolution approving a conditional use permit for a school at 70 E. County Road B. The city bases this permit on the findings required by the code and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in - one year. 4. If a parking shortage develops, the property owner shall provide more spaces, subject to approval by staff of a revised parking layout. 5. Dedicate a 25- foot -wide wetland buffer - easement - around the wetland to the City of Maplewood. 6. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling, grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign design and location before the contractor installs them. The developer or contractor shall install these signs before the city issues a certificate of occupancy for the first phase of this development. 7. The applicant shall obtain an off -site drainage easement for storm drainage onto the abutting neighbor's property adjacent to the northeast corner of the site or retain their storm water on their own property. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes all The motion passed. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JULY 27 1999 -- B. School Campus Proposal — Waldorf School, 70 County Road B East Secretary Tom Ekstrand presented the staff report. He said the engineering department reconsidered the drainage issue on this property and concluded that, if the runoff rates do not increase, the city does not have a problem with permitting the drainage to run into the pond on the- adjacent property. This would be subject to the city engineer's approval. Mr. Ekstrand noted that the Maplewood assistant city engineer felt quite comfortable that there would not be a problem with all the additional rainwater ponds that the applicant is proposing. Chairperson Ledvina asked for clarification of the portable classroom concept. Mr. Ekstrand described them as temporary, modular -type structures that would probably only be used until Phase II of the construction begins. He showed the board brochures of various temporary buildings that were given to him by the applicant. Paul May, a principal with Rafferty, Rafferty, Tollefson, Architects (the architect for the project), and Stuart Nielsen, a parent and chair of the building committee for the Minnesota Waldorf School, were present for the applicant. Bruce Chamberlain, principal with Hoisington - - Koegler Group, Inc. (landscape architects and planners), was also in attendance to answer any stormwater and planting questions. Mr. May presented a schematic model of the building. He noted a number of items: (1) this is _a single -story design, (2) the current building will be renovated, expanded and used, (3) it will have a wood frame and be fully sprinklered, (4) the exterior and interior will be handicap- accessible, (5) the project would be phased, (6) wood will be the primary exterior material with board and batten similar to the existing building, (7) the roof will be asphalt shingles with some metal roof for accent, and (8) glass windows will be added around the front entrance. Mr. May explained the phases. The first phase will encompass the main building, the first four classrooms on one wing, the first three on another wing, and two of the three kindergarten rooms. The second phase will include the gym. These will all be permanent buildings. Mr. May said they intend to develop the whole site, including the parking area and paths. He hoped that Phase I could begin this fall and be completed for opening in the fall of 2000. Phase II will hopefully begin within three to five years. Bruce Chamberlain, a landscape architect, said one of the goals of the site design is to work with the existing topography and vegetation on the site. According -to -Mr. Chamberlain, they _ aim to restore the habitat quality. He said there is a lot of erosion along the steep hillside and that a lot of soil has been added to the site so the grading is "fairly contrived." Much of the parking lot was placed to the north side of the site to minimize vehicle traffic and reduce the amount of paved surface. Mr. Chamberlain spoke about the stormwater gardens along the walk from the parking lot to the building. These gardens will be helpful in controlling stormwater runoff. Mr. Chamberlain said one change to the plans will be the addition of a NURP pond on the site. All drainage from the site will be incorporated - - into - this - - pond in an effort to control rate and quality of the runoff that is entering the wetland at the northeast corner of the property. Mr. Chamberlain described the service road to the southwest corner. as having driving lanes that would basically accommodate tire tracks with a center portion of turf or groundcover. He Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes of 07 -27 -99 said deliveries will be limited because the school has a maximum of about 250 students and no hot lunches are served. Boardmember Robinson clarified that the pond was located in the northeast corner. The applicant had no questions about the conditions in the staff report. Boardmember Shankar preferred to approve only the site plan at this meeting. He felt the elevations submitted were too small a scale for a project of this size. He requested that the applicant return with a larger scale plan. Chairperson Ledvina also asked for samples of the building material and color. Mr. Ledvina recognized that the applicant wanted to improve the environmental features of the site, but he said the board could not approve any activities within a wetland. He requested a detailed outline of specific projects, i.e. trees and vegetation being removed or changed, that were planned for the wetland. Mr. Ekstrand said a watershed district is just being formed to cover this area. He recommended that the Ramsey - Washington Watershed Board be used for advice and guidance in reviewing this. Mr. Chamberlain said the only activity planned within the wetland and the buffer is to revegetate with native plant species. No hydrology changes will be made. Mr. Ledvina noted that the landscape plan did not address the severe erosion on the slopes on the south and east side of the site. He felt it was appropriate to incorporate a remedy for this erosion in the plan. Boardmember Robinson said she was "still a little bit hung up" on the overall design of the school. She noted that there was not a playground adjacent to the kindergarten rooms. It was explained that swings, etc. were not included in the play area for kindergarten students in the Waldorf School. Emphasis is on imaginative play. Play equipment is intended for grades one through eight. The main building will be used as a central gathering space for various activities, a bookstore, administrative area and special subject area. Chairperson Ledvina shared Ms. Robinson's concerns about the play areas, especially the area to the southwest. He thought the circular turnaround there was "overdone in terms of the function." He felt it did not serve a real functional purpose if access is being provided here for emergency and service vehicles. He was also concerned about mixing play activity and -roadways. He was of the op -inion that this should be reconsidered in the design. Mr. Ledvina didn't feel the two -lane drive was appropriate from a maintenance standpoint. Mr. Chamberlain said the width of the driveway was 14 feet. He specifically stated that it was not ____.____.____a__two -lane roadway it is essentially a single -lane road of tire patches that is without a curb. The turning radius is based on the requirements for fire trucks. Boardmember Shankar said that since this was such a large scale project, he would like to see a plan of some of the sites at a one inch equals 16 feet scale. He suggested that a plan of a typical classroom could be at an eighth inch. Mr. Shankar also asked for building elevations as part of a full package. Chairperson Ledvina thought this was a "wonderful use of this site" and he wanted to see it happen. Secretary Ekstrand concurred with Mr. Ledvina that the board could consider the site plan at this meeting and then request additional elevation plans. He said staff was fairly comfortable with the proposal because it is a hidden site. Mr. Ekstrand also thought the "quality is going to be there." Mr. May was willing to submit these but was concerned that the conditional use permit be approved so they could continue working on the project. The board was just not comfortable approving the building design unless they saw the elevations. It was Community Design Review Board -3- Minutes of 07 -27 -99 clarified that the additional information requested included materials, dimensions, floor plans, and colors. Boardmember Robinson moved the Community Design Review Board: C. Approve the site and landscape plans date- stamped July 8, 1999, for the proposed Minnesota Waldorf School campus at 70 County Road B East. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall: a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to the city engineer for approval. b. Revise the landscape plan to increase the size of the Quaking Aspen and River Birch trees to 2 %2 inches in caliper. c. Obtain an off -site drainage easement for storm drainage onto the abutting neighbor's property adjacent to the northeast corner of the site, or retain their storm water on their own property. 3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Provide continuous concrete curbing around all proposed parking and drive areas. b. The trash- dumpster screening requirement is waived unless the dumpsters would be visible to the public. In that case, an enclosure shall be provided using the same materials and color as the building. c. An inground lawn- irrigation system shall not be required because of the remote nature of this site. d. Provide site - security lighting as required by the code. The light source, including the lens covering the bulb, shall be concealed so not to cause any nuisance to drivers or neighbors. e. Install handicap parking sign for handicap parking spaces in compliance with ADA requirements. f. Install a stop sign at the exit onto County Road B. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. Community Design Review Board -4- Minutes of 07 -27 -99 b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable Fetter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 6. The applicant -shall resubmit the building design, along with elevations and materials being used, such as floor plan, color schemes, and samples of materials and colors, to the community design review board for approval. Boardmember Johnson seconded. Chairperson Ledvina had some concerns about the landscape plan and made a friendly amendment to add C.7. Require the applicant to submit a proposal to staff that would repair the - erosion damage_ to .the south and east slopes of the site and revegetate these slopes to maintain long -term stability. The applicant also shall provide more details on the work that will be undertaken in the wetland as it relates to revegetating or modifying vegetation in the northeast corner of the site. Boardmember Robinson changed C. 2. c. to read "Obtain an off- site drainage easement for storm drainage onto the abutting neighbor's property adjacent to the northeast corner of the site, retain their storm water on their own property, or maintain- the existing drainage flow by not increasing the rate of runoff into the pond on the adjacent property. These amendments to the motion were acceptable to Boardmember Johnson, the seconder. Secretary Ekstrand summarized the changes sagingthatthe building elevations and design (the items in Condition C.6.) would need to be resubmitted to the community design review board but the stabilization of the slopes and the wetland area plans would be submitted for staff review. Ayes all The motion passed. Agenda Item �Z MEMORANDUM Ac otjOn b co, j ��Orse TO: City Manager *djr ie � FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner RQj°Q SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review and Revision — Dege Garden Center e en er LOCATION: 831 Century Avenue North DATE: August August 17, 1999 INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Dege Garden Center at 831 Centur Avenue North is due for review. George Dege, the property owner, is also requesting approval of a revision to his CUP to add a 5- by 30 -foot fenced area behind his building for tree storage and display. Refer to the maps on pages 4 -6. 1 have shown the new fenced area on the site plan on p a g e 6. Mr. Dege has installed this fence. He considers it temporary since he plans to use it from June to October and it is not permanently installed. The fence is placed on wooden timbers and fastened to his building exterior by brackets. BACKGROUND _ June 3, 1971: The city council approved a CUP for the parking lot at Dege Garden Center. June 1, 1988: The city council reviewed the CUP and revised the conditions. Refer to p a g e 7. June 22, 1989: The city council reviewed the CUP and required review again in five Y ears. June 27, 1994: The city council reviewed the CUP and required review again in five Y ears. In 1988, Mr. Dege installed a garage in the parking lot and was subsequently required b court q Y action to remove it since it violated the terms of his 1971 CUP. DISCUSSION Complaints We were notified of the new fence by two neighbors who complained that Mr. Dege is not complying with his CUP and approved site plan. They are concerned that if -this new fenced area is allowed, Mr. Dege will continue to expand his business even further. Refer to the information on pages 8 -18 from Iry Dreher. Violation of the CUP This outside tree- storage area is not permitted since it was not part of the approved site p Ian and violates the following conditions: Condition 2 — "The parking lot may only be -used for parking for- -the garden center building." The new fencedarea is within the easterly drive lane of the parking lot. Condition 3 – "No commercial use for sale, storage, display or advertising signs of garden materials, plants or any other kinds of goods shall be allowed anywhere on the legally described property to which this conditional use permit is issued or the parking lot." The chain -link enclosure constitutes a new storage and display area not permitted by the CUP. This condition requires that there shall be no additional storage or displays anywhere on the site. Impact on the Current Zoning Mr. Dege's parking lot is zoned R1 (single dwelling residential) and his building is located on property zoned BC (business commercial). The westerly edge of his building, in fact, is on the R1 /BC zoning boundary line. Refer to page 6. The new fencing, therefore, is on that part of the site zoned R1. As stated above, the city council only allowed the parking lot in this R1 -zoned area. A retail use on the R1 lot violates the zoning code. Conclusion This fenced storage /display area is not unsightly, but it does create the following code violations: 1. It narrows the drive lane to a width of 18 feet —code requires 24 feet for atwo -way drive aisle. (The drive aisle is nonconforming already at 23 feet wide.) 2. Approval of this fencing would allow a material storage. and retail use on property zoned R1. This would be a violation of the R1 zoning requirements. The city council should deny this request since approval would create the two code - compliance deficiencies mentioned. If the city council wants to allow this fenced storage area, they would need to rezone part of this lot to BC since a commercial use is not allowed on R1 land. They would also have to grant a variance for reduced drive -aisle width. COMMISSION ACTION On August 16, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council: 1. Deny the conditional use permit revision request for Dege Garden Center, 831 Century Avenue North. 2. Continue the conditional use permit for Dege Garden Center, 831 Century Avenue North, subject to two conditions. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Deny the conditional use permit revision requested by George Dege to add a fenced -in outdoor storage area for plant materials on a portion of his parking lot at 831 N. Century Avenue. Denial is based on the following reasons: 2 1. Approval would narrow the easterly drive lane in the parking lot to a width of 18 feet —code requires 24 feet for a two-way drive aisle. (The drive aisle is nonconforming already at 23 feet wide.) 2. Approval of this fencing would allow a material storage and retail use on property zoned R1 (single dwelling residential). This would be a violation of the R1 zoning requirements. 3. Since the proposed fenced storage area is in the drive aisle it would potentially obstruct traffic flow. B. Continuation of the conditional use permit for Dege Garden Center, at 831 Century North Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. Mr. Dege shall remove the outdoor, plant - material storage area behind the building within one month of this council action. 2. If Mr. Dege does not remove this fencing as directed, the city council shall reconsider the continuation of this permit. If Mr. Dege removes the fencing as required within one month, the city council shall review this permit again in five years. p:sec251dege.99 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. CUP conditions dated June 1, 1988 5. Letter and information from Iry Dreher dated July 15, 1999 3 Attachment 1 W Cr 4'` 'n M°°A Cr a ow . a s 7 aow cot t rwraaE war � AVE 3 � 1 6 00lJOER W 4 � E MARYLAND AVE MAMITFIORME A G,y MAGNOLM AVE. or� � A � �• PL tj tg § i z AVE G5E AVE. � W. AVE AVE 7th 5T. � � 7th ST. i cy BM 1 � MINNEF" AVE M-ARGAREr AVE C� 5th � AVE. v fRQI Olt CONWAY AVE FROM TAGS Rp, LOCATION MAP 4 i N Attachment 2 — ° 14 13 Q. X 11 to 9 a 7 o 00 00 I d 46 Cb dMI I • I6 I 1? 1 a 19 20 2t 22 �� o r N I I I FT Ile � I I (4.7) (ost) �4-�) _ � _ __- 6 3) o 6•Z IOQ w r N « SO SO 100 o() I-M r 1308.7 • 17 7.8 5 :. - • T }.- i N 8 g'S 2 "�! G 54. Z 1 � . 7.5� Yoc� ;�:::::::. _ . _ .... t- � • . _ N =DEGE - GARDEN CENTER 2 ( - ,� 30 0 I y''� _ 3Z) Cr. �` I 4 < `� 1 T 9 .o3 0 5 N . 2 1 9 . 5 .,,�/L O �4 n ( 3 ) to 7 o � 173 -77 O O IN g ( X22 25 - N I -•- - -- PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 4 N Attachment 3 . .• • I • t•• ••••••.., •�• • .tom �•: ���� • ••• :� ••• o► I , % .• •• • 000 .010 •• • •.• • ••� • -, •• , 0 • •• ••v • • ' • , • •S - • • 0 00 0 • " •' • - • �:•�.:.7'TH • _STREET : o000 . • • 0 0 0 . b . • • 0 0 0 s • • • . • ,.. • - y , 4w es 1 ' • •. • • • a n j.4c, •' . •• •'.' L'..,• • • f illtt �t •. . - ; • •� a• r • • ' ♦ � its v . D . Q • 0 J Q 't ' - . f . •• 0 • • . •• .iG�i.. ZONING BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN R1 (SINGLE DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) ZONE AND BC (BUSINESS COMMERCIAL) ZONE. �--- R1 IS WEST OF ZONING LINE BC IS EAST OF ZONING LINE ---� SITE PLAN 4 N OUTDOOR PLANT - STORAGE AREA Attachment 4 12. The zero setback to the R -1 zone to the west is justified since the R - zone is developed as a commercial parking lot. 13. The existing setback to the south lot line is justified since the canopy is an extension of the existing building line and removing part of the canopy to meet the setback would be less attractive and expose storage and sales items to view. Approval is subject to the followin g conditions: 1. The site plan submitted by Mr. Dege on October 27, 1986, shall be revised based on a survey of the south lot line and the west line of the canopy. The revised plan and the remodeling plans submitted on December 15, 1987, and May 23, 1988, shall be con- sidered part of this permit, except for an change must be a y - g P proved by the Community Design Review Board. a 2. The parking lot may only be used for parking for the g arden center building. 3. No commercial use for sale, storage, display or advertising signs of garden materials, plants, or any other kinds of goods shall be allowed anywhere on the legally described property to which this conditional use permit is issued or the parking lot. 4. No portion of this site or parking lot shall be used for truck or trailer storage. 5. Review, renewal or revocation of this permit shall in accordance with City code. 6. Any trees on the site that die must be replaced. 7. No exterior lighting or speakers shall be allowed 80 The canopy shall not be enclosed for year around use. 9. Sales under the canopy or outdoors shall be limited to g arden products from March through October. No other type of sales or storage shall be allowed. 10. Council may require removal of the canopy for additional parking or to reduce parking demand if the use changes. 11. A fence does not have to be constructed along the south lot line. Secon by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. b. Garage Re)oval Deadline 1. Councilmembe')� Juker moved that the deadline for the garage removal be September 30 �Q 99. Motion died for lack IN f a second. en/ �8 07/15/1999 11: 27 9415058612 P PAGE 01 Attachment 5 __ "19f�E�rou� � m��'w ✓� P,4 �,�� �` �7v— S�Sob o IP4 . _ �/L --� ��'� ,� max/ 6� x,46 �.,C ra� . �A�r� �iv�r � rL L. 4 EA �� � y .TU.v �' w • r v �� = �a v ev 7-o u,.r(✓u __. X12 �r,rc .,��7f�1� (`l'�f /J .mss �' /2, '�F �s wE�� 07/15/1999 11:27 9415058912 1 70, J st, Phut ix PAGE 02 '71 . Wd?v r. . r 0 Mciplewoo;Y • i ent er ust o.bev Darki The o",,ers of Dege Garden Center, 831 Century Ave. N., n�ust cosh it with conditions of theirs e r use ersYtit that a low, on pustocmer p arking n the r a Wn lot, th e Maple- wood City Council said last weak. TJKREt heighbo r' inju residents asked lash eek that De e's p er- 1 m i� b e re because of a tiv- � hie on the 'pairing lot, located at Mayh1li Road and 7th Street, l that included sale of merchan- dise from a plastic greenhouse, sate and Misplay of gravel and rail flis and storage of a commercla[dumpster. The ci staff already had red- tagged t :fgreenhouse, and the '.du;npstelt etas been moved, it - was no hi q staff report. Requesti g a review of Dege's permit wteOe Anthony Cahanes, 2703 E. Ith St.; Dort Codhlecht, 825 M AY01 Road; a Irving Dreher, $14 Mayhill toad. Two other res d #nts on 7th Street they ha to complaints about the garden irenter. RESIDIENTS also complained that Deg i#� p y to es dem onstrate l awn mowers and rotot illers o n n6rby vEa 4ant property, that a louUspeaker has been installed outside th to page em- K lz e es askd, that cQrnmercia ve- is haveo, beent P arked in the lat I9ege's ;noes of the parking lot, residents said, arr►ounts to "de facto r�z*- rag" of the land from residential to commercial. ' They saiO the various uses Of, the Tot , a6o , were decreasing the amount of -parking space avail - - "able and •f*rciag drivers to park on the street. GlEOR01 DEOE, however, said the sreenhouse was 'in- stalle 10 protect bedding puts, Whkh he said make up lone - third, of the company's business, 4iuring the summer months, Nge has sold bedding !ants In the ark jrtg lot in - uncooperative with neighbors vi g .said w! no e ' who di d complain. ous ears it+� com taints Council members said the O fenced -off area ege _said a did not near the buildirtg, where plants ' are displayed, ca nnot be use for -- p' arki anywa lie as ld-he had Lard on[ e complain#'from a ne' bor about the Sreenhouse a did not krww some of the o er arm tivities were roblems. The net hors' said, ho r, that Ike e continual) l p ted the conditions of the s e- cial use permit and had been . �i • , nut agreed e was in violation of the conditions. CitUp Manager Michael Miller said $ a ould rated a zone chap i order W s ell p lants in the parking'area. , TF�e loudspeaker, c o u nx i t embers noted, is legal, thou ai hbcrs would have ro IM66NNOM --- ante oroin ncagincirceriz (4�aa7` �FLL o,) ?,F 7*1 Zo.Ve C�`fflN6rr 07/ 15 1999 11: 27 9415058612 -Ext!- ci ... extra 11yiCAR L IPErrirr ' �tatl.Wrjt�r It is t ncoirimon to hear about a r'q p,o1'nei ban - ♦r. ding 't j :Q;:to'a'upport a cause that � ; tw.l t :them, or to op- pose °�si' 'j�kt'that'.won't. But seldom" daes".jo ' hear about a neighborhood hiving as much fun creatft ' plan ,4f• attack as did the M*Oldwood homeowners who live ftit• the"-'Dege Garden Center; 811 Century Ave. A coUolc of months agcy, the neigbb6M, noticed the construc- 'tion of , vrage hear the rear of the . *Ong lot ' a t the garden P we Maypullwool Preview center. Resenrch indicated that the owner of the garden center had been granted a permit for the garage; but further reseorch by the neighbors also, revealed that the permit had been issued erroneously. Ud by Irving Dreher, the neighbors not only organized to appear at two public hearings regarding the legality of the garage, but they also produced a sma newsletter which Included their position on the issues in the case of the garden center garage issue, However, before getting into that issue, the newsletter, calm P LLW 0 L 0 - P'REVIEW "MAW &"K Pf�' N�MGI Ai�.:� k / AO[II � �i ■'.�.'. ++,�,...� PRWI s w ist s.rw►�. it M U46* u� , vri PW4510 w be • =?w 1w A► ���ti� • w1�q�f� N EIGfl RS OF the Dege Garden Center not only organized themselves recently to oppose tonstructlon of a new garage at the center, but they 2190 p4blished i 'newsletter playfu "recommending" a change in the city's hetre and logo. A portion of the front page of the newsletter is shown here. Another page, which wit blank, was identified as a sample of the view recommended logo: a white sheep on a white background. newsletter ,facetiously recom- mended that the city logo, a maple leaf, be changed to the symbol of a sheep with the wool pulled over i ts eyes.. The change In logo," the newsletter said, `would consist of a white sheep on a white bickg r4urid, Dropping the outline "would also save ex- pense and'allow printing of street signs in one color while assuring that the logo will be designed with • little chance for error." At a public hearing Nov, 24, the Maplewood City Council did listen to these residents. The ga rden center garage (which was 90 percent complete) will have to come down, But the city's name and logo will remain as is. PAGE 03 d * ._... , usi ess unamu se f f ghb6r Itimy tuf resoft to 6S or...,res.uits •ems 1 • By 41RI(No0 ,l ' S taff 1NrN t He aim la0kiO ely sugg ftfrA Q -- d Ws ma Is UW bol be rt&- Sorno Maplewood rtsidents have • • plod by a and Lut to av oid rftoru4 to satire — lucludi•ng a The garage is not anowtd uar Wt 04 - a is the :atone the city sugseaii that the city change its the putt drWneuy JUVW to t pests afbrs t=t41* M symbol — in their d= Dege la 1971, mi Comit owm C 0 a pleted ratter thawbt farts to $et city officials to fats a Maplewwd'e -- re it ' • bu 40 comply with its wage 4nt Affi ' olm rau3 the city Mistakenly W perul As a recoil, Dege was *N erect by sued e a bri g perrWt for the Ftft 1 4eft3 in the vicWty of Dege the eft to elk ralle to . Gacd�:rz Ce'aGer, 831 Centu Ave., which t� �au�ag !x� Iat� that ' �Wne � r I was �'��e of the tunit.� com P G orge ,ve ti�w cle. la t1W gpdo Mar's ' loge w parking exceedin the fitted for bb p ro g b e � wevel, th+e iI a greed too L . the b�aast► on y y ppaa 6 visa be I actgtas1 pert to al a ne ighbors corn zed foe as low as +�cp►tt ed lot, pb abop Swage coastructiou, D!- de l f al re Thad p been �- with soy d, W city tagged Um build - To 411 ate whoa to their er va . me am rot Wed onastnKlWa. Later, certd, re26denls picketed City }&U o DUO" sty briany fitted the ut�oppage a nd distributed a s it t i r i c a l "lei - DREW �W Dege to complete the " ne*31t r "The Mxyp+tllwooi Pre- , prat W bell maters , view," before ' lut week's V c oil s toogue�lae. c QUM S" me '`'w' a ity tth Teo cater is on a site I%e oftsletter, written by Ir- Doge yi at* that It for commey* ving bit er, 014 M.syhill Road, years and sugMtW (be city's cW ww , ' pattI f or residentW. e criUcized the city for Lu uirig. Doge n b changed to Meyv- In 1071, the g lot was per- a i� permit to co"truct a pullwool tecet;se " tht bureaucra# WWW = the pertioa sonar for res garage at bus garden c entew and for cy attempts to pull the wool paver Went#al eel, a we that ao mar (sat eating other reatrictio" the ey+ea af its. ".. eo�i to city cie. 10 the "Maypullwo4l' Preview; "' poked a little fun at city hall. Tongue- in•cheek, the humeowners recommended that the city change Its name from Maplewood Jo Maypuliwool because , -o f .' "the city bureaucracy's attdmpts to pull the wool aver the eyes of local residents," ' . Dreher noted that this is the se- cond time the city has erroneous- ly Issued a building permit to the garden center; and he warned, "The city May try to pull wool over the public's eyes by refusing to admit this second error..." In addition, the neighbors' 07/15/1999 11: 27 �;tiut�s 3$ ages 9415058612 P 1r0UU rVi;= 25 1%4 z ;� . .i 1 WED,, DECEMBER 3, 1088 Y 0 PE� 'r� PAGE 04 b It agreed with Dege, and Ha If= I r e. recommended that hi' ond'dona l 9 use permit be revised so that • it s 9 would prevent commercial truck 1 and trailer storage on site, The coun- cil vote! 3.2 Lo revise and update P Dvgv's conditional use permit, but • Y the reviaio4 does not allow f the ••y rwiyonitructed d g1k ordere remove raga. Liege • *aid in a later interview'thi f By C, -�ROL YFTTITT Reyie* Correspondent With posatePs and signs in hand, Maplewood residents, who are neighbors of ; Dege Garden C en ter, picketed oity'hall and then filled the city council meeting room last week to oppose thet recent construction of a garage - on the -- business - ' -- parking lot. George D6, one of the co- owners of the gard0ri center at 831 Century Ave, N., had obtained a building per. rnit in Oct*Ot for the garage. Less than two wtleks later, the city discovered it had issued that permit erroneously., and then halted the construction At the time, the bui we.$ . - �:Mplete - except -- fur final roofin tlntiterial, an entrance door and a fe* sheets � ' of si ding. In order to prevent weather damage to the - baiiding, however,the city ternporar y lifted its stop -work order, and allltu completion of the 1 The city w* then faced with a business Owner who wanted to corn• plete his gilroge as well as with several neighbors who wanted the building to be co:zipletely dism A public hearing Was held Nov. 24. and in the end,, the council voted 3.2 f0l' removal of the garage. According to the existing condi• tic nil use ormit, which was grunted in 191 to make way for the plc rking lot ire a residential zone, such a garage is not allowed, Dege~ intended to UIe the structure fog° winter rvirking of his recrp,.a ional %- chicle ;end the he uses to pull it. However, tho eonditioizal use per. cTi�c SPe6f1cr -1l states that no por. tion of tilt arkln lot can be F� g used for truck or t ra i ler s torage. ' f iV LL: U.4 we; 41wLiig, but that he wants to work with the ci. That condition should have ty to recoup some of hie expenses. prevented issuance of the building H e said he has about $8,040 tied up in permit to Dege in October, which the garage, and since he believes he WI'S pointed out to city staff by Dege's nelghbol,s, has done "nothing wrong," the city should reimburse him for most of The neighbors also objected to the that gMount. Dege said he does not want to take garage, saying they feared the new building would inevitably be used the city to court, "'This is something a are extension of the garden center for that should be settled working -- together he said, business purposes such as storing: Because he followed the city's re- supplies. -_ Furthermore they said, ' she quest and built the garage as close to garage detracts from the': residential Character of the u . existing -shrubbery as possible, Dege said dismantling the building at this and they feared an encroachment of the time would break branches on trees. commercial land tows rd " the residential homes, 'therefore,- he -does - - not - -- intend t L. 2 Dege promised In writing that t garage would be used for the AN OTHER ISSVE which surfaced -- -- purpose of storing his RV and t . - -- He also told the council that he d - during _ the - pest - -- - two tonnes was N96's practice of selling plants built the garage with a nearly t under an outdoor canopy during the roof to impact the neighborh a little as possibl and that he i- spring and summer. The original conditional use por- ed green paint so that the g e would blend in trait does not allow sale, display, or with with me• Y landscaping, advertising signs of garden Materials or plants on the rkin � He said the structure is atbo 90 Dege received a ° lot. >� permit in March h Percent hidden from view on o Sides, and that he offered of 1981 for a tem porary structur for to n t shrubs on th other side to cony l it selling bedding plants outdoors, it was removed in July Qf that year, from view, ",hut my neighbor t Said, "You can't placate tine !th Later, Dege constructed a year- round plexiglas canopy, which, shrubbery, and that he just w ed the building down," Dege told technically, Violated his conditional use t ci. ty council, 4 permit. However, since there have been no Dege Pdded that the city a uld complaints fr *rig neighbors about Permit him to complete and k hi bui lding becaus hi fo the canopy or the outdoor sales u' wit now, the plans the building were council decided to include reviewed by a in the revised conditional use permit prupriate city staff, a represent ive visited the site, the city accepts permission for the canopy to remain for he plans, apecifscations were draw and the sales to be conducted outdoors, p according to the building Inspect 's requests, and a building permit granted, jo�r,� ,sue T Iletc�— t/NOFX P�iQM IT 71 07/15/1999 11 :27 941505 P PAGE 05 sections, Vatt�.e si, xw.ber s1 .lie Suburb Newspap so p.��. w«t., ate. 'r Liege ' Garden tenter re Ues r ni 8�► Y.enor4&6 w,wx Sts Welter I% The debate bet en owners of the Dege Cardein !Center and surTounding ne ighbors -- appears to be beating up agnih. Otorge Deg*, owns and operates► the. coo n along with his father, A ert Deg threw gas on the ,: last week when he requested "s mzoning for the company p rt yo BEVZRAL nelAbors of th Dege Garden Ced0r, $3 N. Century Ave,. whb informally call themselves -tl* -aplewood Homeowners Assatittion, have often complaine *bout the b usinese►. They -argue that the company"* outeidk Gales area vl0lates the speci4 ow permit rthat allows the carr4wy to exist on the- residentlafly 'tom site. The expanding 04ze of the outdoor sales Sma, mod related isaues raised by ''neighbors have come balbre the Mapood City Council aeweral Unies sires 10 75. Oebateh&s The moat recent cen tem d on a ' Dege b about a year ago aj $h _ hr• DMOR SUILT At after receiving a from Maplewood. `Hi when neighbors s�tvO stru,ction unde act the city that I3's uae permit did not *11 [rage otrnit ever, can - alert- the - neighborhood spat garage. Heaiizi its Terror, th city food Dege to cease-c struction. 71w council ordered hirer to remove the it Dege challenged that deci- sion in court and, in at summary judgement was allowed to keep the garage, Part of the ju dge'a argument ruled that, since tits garage was more than 90 De r. nt complete at the ume Cd the construction s , It sheer# be alknftd to mrnain, Maplewood. along wrath the homeowners association, has appealed the fact that a sum- mary judgement h as been m e claiming Instead that ver- bal testimony should be allowed before a judge, That appeal has been heard and is currently under consideration. Ma City Attorney P*t Kelly said that he expects a decitaon on the appeal withiu the next wftk. If the city an - homeowners win the appeal, aceDrdt to Kelly. th wh a ga ra remov►od will again card. How+�e — r. this time too ty moray would most likely be allowed. DIC09 HOWIN has mm- plicated the matter by entering a re quest #.hat the city council Initiate a rezoning of the garden center property to business commercial (BC) from its cur- rent residentW- single dwelling (R -11. He argues that the outdoor ales area, which Is included in his company's conditional us per-rnt t, is not allowed in ran t - y nc City pl anner Geolt Din suggested that the council go along with Dege',s request in order to delete the appraAd of outdoor sales in the R#1 *one. Olson believes the current permit does not con - form with ci regulations, and action show be n to cor- rect the Wtuatlon. De& oaid in a ettter to the city that the neighbors were using the garage wsue to get b ack at lrim , just be cause the cameavelit , tg teat #the wf hes of sm"d or his neighbors and appmvrecl his reque#t for a s pe- cial use permit for the outalde salmi of plants, "Isn't this just sour ompear he wr e, Dege further su ests that approving his request "may eliminate , inate the nitpicking" by the neighbors Just because they didn't ge t their gra TUB 11210HRoKe argue, ho'a t"r, that De ge is simply attempting to get back at them for trying to regulate his busi- nam In a Nov. 23 letter to the city council, neighbor Carl Norberg suggests that the neighbors are wOling to work w Dege but that Dege is unwilling to negotiate a tompro- mise with them. The letter also suestr shat _ Dege_ should - be - forced - to -petl- tion-- for -a- zoning change - hbmwlf lnstead of having it be council Initiated. tM a signatums from a majority of the surrounding '%ch: horr would be required for to - initiate the zon -41 --- n - eighbors -- have - - - - no deolm set Mr. Dege go out of bu,sin s," Norberg wrrott. "Ho they also feel that they - - -right to rely an the reside Is) Integrity of the neig a of council opted to delay an ction on Dcge's rezoning at unto Ws current court with the city i s resolved, QeL jo Co NP j7 -Jkqz U 5� PEX)f / r I 12 St ��CtI D15 �EiecIJ /' /0 1IFPf 4 155 Ev r W V Garden center asked to remove garage By Ann Baiter sign wrrIW Wpiewrood fiorrist my have to be built w a p- '� for a t ar s d a ruling . by the A OWW a • f is being hailed as s victory by at' my s Who the City of Cod 131d a men nmi gbors of Dege Gardets Omtw, $31 MMacy Ave. i Hot newt George GeV will ask Me city mmeff to am him to keep his by tenoning the )aadd where it from r3dential to coarl. At M y the cone writ be asbW to a public hearing on the gt#ian, es garage has been a dramatic is- .swmMa It started more than a year ago, when De obtained a butlftg perms t from a Q- N CO M CO Ln m N cn M LO CD �IAPLEWOOD mac to put a parkbig roc an the resap- -. t�ail� mood ia�xl in�wck of the center's d bso ` to P U P tm raeL 4 `I# was an eyesore,!' said Dion wrhwe hwa at 826 Mal! Road fps the bade of the garden ceo- tesr Wber the gange wry Lft alt. "Foie barns don't fit in with a group of . Af fig bores tez years they look W a Ph" Of JURIL . iGschlt added that "the real issue issue bothaing him wd other residents is s Wndmc they feel the garden inter has to spmead its COIN operation beyond the ee1lt&s buildlDg into the back ares4 which is so d for reside n - tia1, not commemial use.. He and other neilAbors complained to city officials, wrbo mocked cif files and fomd that in 197 the city had issued Deges father, Albert, a special use pa. • but i vau y bamned sli Of a!' tc�1,+Crs. Dege asked to be sllovred to keep bit barn, swing bead spent #10 on it wW takieg it dig Coat $1,5N. 72 d. They We- phoned city eouneU men becs. They tes- d ied at bings They printed a braflet saying the city's name sbaeild be Ch anged to wPOOI" became Dege and city efficlak wet tie "milling the w wr over the eyes of rests. One M appeared at a nvw Last December !n a � twne to etc the leafleL The city council then voted # Dege vroul,d have to remove his , an the groru ZU that the IM Co use pannk ffarode the ]rill which bad been i i�tak Y by a city employee uuaawrare of the earler permit's terms. Der then shed tbt ct ,and Raney Db Uid J ud g e B ertmmd • .a icy jWgm at in Dege's tavw,_ that tht city didn t have a -to . grit s ib buNivin permit for the p- rep after he ws W percent fl aidied with it city officials the allow W Dege to fixush the gar p by putting the roof on it. But the city also apy p-alad the court "s "on, and the ne' burs hired an at- that the case didn't n*My a tee mattec_ r Ia revere ing the district C=Cs ded- sioo last week the appeals curt stated that Dege had • sought the NO per- Init in 'bad faith," that he was respod- bte for knowing the terms at the 197 enditiong use permit and that the Pie aM r ara ns* Gar-age CoMinued from Page i amount of money be had invested In the garage was irrekvenL - - jaha ke =i t # aaate ther, but he sOR it was un- reasonable to expect Dege #o know Me krw of a permit imued to his father 15 years earlier. Maplewood City Attome� ri Pat - ck Kelly said, � The deem' d on allows onft wrfll support enforce - ment of sonlog ordinan -ces if tbey"re reasonable. As qty in- creal soning becomes more and Oro to ME Ce the In- hL�t1"eWood City Planner Geoff �ls�oe nK "I think it's a brilliant for aH titres. It means tit a pr�opexty owner cut violate a tg Iom�lto with a . WI - Al' C4 LS 07/15/1999 11:27 9415058612 P PAGE 07 �. �:�-_- 0 settles 11ttie Ce.n d'**' G te* Ini ar en r -te,, U force Do to remove the ter than an of the other *noi A.M4A 4*% A.. i's ors he has A—, r I . I U I F 4ir -SECOND issull MP t con -dono'n'othf n but i rove co 10ouncil tak ltp.. i De use of a pard' f looks...." Center con Irv, situti,ai 04 king 1 aserax to g el COUNCEL is apparent Wo % )-iAsi'm .4ay ','Pib* 22 re that t - Do it an the issue as wall, w4LX nd 'd4n enter 0onti use •A oil inember N i - After it rs d be w" 1xinale An- tfon deA t) 6 a' di&a t y ,c6u l al lowed as:sslos ari& durt bill back In the herds Dogs's most recent Ct P allaiwa. favor owin Doge, own 41he QW .. sides in a' ftneod of th• to - n and *0 owin "lei • the, rairide n S q.tho -W id lot noxt to the Iffing, in the MIZ or am 10L, i garden ea, A i ;;: ,at. 6das 9N"'Or, , - c the lot is zoned, Counil Mom r ferr over two se .... 6 ft M 1 residential al)i, on the Other h in the 1.o nz, to eit-V "nunce. olatz 61ution to Mmove ii4s -*a rcial sales are The" the P ra g o n R bm, a4d �,wttb* do* d OW&A xdtb si g ht spur the faith OfTbrt k. , *ai omt to resolve *`For that reason De "a cit ta sauced tai r4scm• the par I THAT,--... `C-0 -�tlai'w lot he is timin for U 0 r asst interest," BajWsk attempt to 1kilidn-as, to m it "is to this rom4fiod a M I %-.JL h a am th hie have Wo no the lociRl level (within tho ...4% 1 A 41- AM' all. a _--nearthe touncil bwhoad th t 4 d v'lf .that domn't -work --ouV. While - iDtk #...'..And allowed- it - with the. CUP ovan. thton may have to for6o our nel 'i'Ahat thO,t-.: "Ahou It doesn't oonforizi with will somewhere down the road. Issue Ai anco, the C*Unal's intent "The fact .1 or Mm or , n re nee," Bastian years, P `4'urt'ba' Aotor,� Was to allow I t. latero saiid,- ..W 0 a 4- be with 9136, - .-Thai nti howov*r, are min*d that he (Do is �idjidln constructio .1 a on t1io co -`if" lobb a rezonin the, our or&n1a1$C4- parkin lot Vie 1 *�&m ntw. sales portion of the lot, usin Council • Mombor Ge"or Air re* n w frozn - creepin commercialism mid Rossbach mainialne,il that tho the cit b�pwtcmstructi other ar a the g arap and tht - ' sAl*o area w* two the prap .� pe= Move* separate issues and the ,shoulA on recreatia , dwiKRV) oh'� the be treated as suc ,p� back part h MONDAY NIGUT several I%# council finall did make a " Resid4en of howG nei both for an4 not move, votin 4-1. to inititate thi er, q ui c Y ikd, Do dug- -Do -D-ag-o a_ -lawyer John. process. for rezonin the -salas P g estin g t a "Witionpl'use na and Doge himself tosIA. area. io SO. ?or tho chknge to before the city council. bomme lopl, it must be tiv permie (C Vhi !Aliw s the Ili lowed ., t. ;. '. - 'Dap mi that if the out- dision parks lot th4 ness 86ei b the staff, plasmi n cornn r1r not.: 06W g am 0. " The d66r sales were not allowed, he and finally return to the citj y to Tha' ak W Id be f out of buAnosa.' council for - a! vote. t Process 4' J' 16: Ar 681! Siva .0 XW 7.. .0d J ,, take, about twq.. riL - ;burl after the Cor Ifs 25 peroent of �n kusi• Thii council took no ac�ion• on, W stmct laws*. the g ara g e, instead dirutin . or Countering -Do howeVor' two sides to most In an to plater I *rod, Co d 044t, fo=fffi" Wn D De to ris Y li'. 9 r, the closest residon• -rooth a compromise. N ithor 4 i teal nei , P Garden the council m whether Ima wild sp Th no Vi i- t hbor to the Do pen sation f& h1i 1 ", , : Clonter, said, ''fie were prmimod be allowod to soll in tho. lot Dep ; pha b the council several y ears ago until the zoning doctNiOn Is madO cl to and won his cans ',inh*t ri to that the lot wbuld only used for Hoiv*var, one n *I ghbor sug . leave the . , ijtW par - . . �* . I poW j ust previous to the council: 0 Maplewood doewan Dreher to one of se"ral nei zonin ini ' tiation vote that they. and in i19ff`*'9 M ' nal' 'bors, wha have organized and might be willing to drop their finding was , '�vertu hired I L isjw to fi Do Not ar a the' ouidoor. One of the .,ioftfi4d#rat1q'ns­, in all neighbor's, however, have *also if Dep would reiftove'tho, last Monda - Aobate joined that g roup. PrAW• Via Im c e will g o - Everson, who claims he Dop did not comment an that. whether the w of the, g arden con- ,Pmposal- -%head with'i6 bri I- int•ndozi Tnnft ��� ff k 14 07J15/1999 11:27 9415058612 P .......... ... OWN" V*Iume 26 ; N 49 ' 30 - Wedy Ara 8, 1 C 0 ILS Sion. recotn e 1). arage - re ove k M staff Wrltw � I Th iptovwood' a ning Cornrni sslao Monde y tight may have t n the ' ball towai (d cin•g •'r4mov y .:�' , _garage - pit : - the �leg�� _ Cent *r P t' lob. ' * : ' ,I. The �i,eW c1e - #ir ,' llorvi . ing the g�trilp m- the' j0U, *hkh, accordi ; to Maplewood City Planner Olson, mimmi they are reco *handing" that the ci council +` It re►mrod:' . ,. In camber ,,, , .`19 6 w Maplow4�o4 housing' `sm'pl+ yes' f ssuad D - - a - buildi - aS t far - tho : but the 'Zdi - btu � por . =it was r found io have n bee issued es a edusly .,' ' . A Do a�'1� ber , oal�r court * ,,, derision e ise ap • itrlior court r t t0inj, a 6ld t? a Might ( the council to order the garago. romovadd-• *lthouti reimbursing Image fbr ! loss. � �' ' , .' • The cif! ►council has yet to rule on that tter, instead hoping . the gardont icenter sod neighbors could rem a compromiser on tho issue, � • How *r, , the Planning Commission recommendation may Moa the council will order it removecl en they consider the issue Mai► 9L SECOND _ other that has ct�eatod fcan betwee�s the god�rn crater and evoral surrtng �rtaeighbors, . MAY also be soled.�d�gr,,�BN .' The plan ink e,��a►�a 4W arse the b►us3us,; a .. # yocatad on thr 10k �oaafa u wlth _ % a. M ci nee d000nt allow it. • nmg of bu4- - - - -- nose - havr.- fought' thcr rezoning. which is required to make the outride safes i claiming the company hms eonsis4ntly expand- ed its outwds saps area dsspite restrledons get by the city council PAGE 08 15 07/15/1999 11:27 9415058612 P • findino 1wre I r �ques- r � � C an aikZ •., ,- ai2 . V/7 ,,,, ,, Neighbor, brthe g�den tenter' sue► e'both- 'and ogainst the A. stop co nstruction 6rder was requ , i0 mmenting, like • issued, which was rescinded Norborg, that tho couneil was By ?&*DON "a shortly thereafter by the city ' being asked to Xcemziodate a Stag Wkiter o un cil to. allow Dee to put a roof lawbreaker - anck 'WW0Q" ateky, 'that' • on the structure to avoid weather Maplow' ood Ci � ' pei�c�nal - v+endettid. •�� . .. ; ,.. , . b+ismbsr ounc3l damage. In D ecember, : , . 23 George h on bony though, the coundl agreed with oust what be the most the ' not hbors and orde the m TZ� council did vote, con troversial VO of his five moved. The ' order - ' Ra h said that he ' ula - month-4d �'°'� Bested that even though Deg* for tb see the 'pTOrniti'eugggest- •'�Vi.th one votes- and the only received a building parmit; he by nei Without that die ""tuYg vote 00 on tlie• i n* , should have known that the coopaz UM ti .,Iae ,and wi - R,oasbach has a rantly f d , , gam was illegal and should not out th• ; ims�►lr to 'for an ultimate rea�►I�ts to the long . have re d - the permit. They that ' C *U . omi se, he said ha standing debate tbetween the ' also ,offered no compe�ation for would vc O }' ''not bath .the zbn Doge Garden deer and a rmrsl i chart fog t � , ` of I ts re�ddeiltial s Wo. 8 be rr a surd r Dig! subs quantly t�crak the the XJF chanp_ ,�",- of mWoOL . - With Council Member Gary•, ease to o rt and wm a•dedidan .+ ; Ba$tl absent the urea ti w to keep the !. The y h s no created a Bu - the only hope for center eil ap ed that n&ng and three #; seussions between the owner Gsor o 0 e to !t his uartr�d re g whic moa won a �¢ . , and prampted Die, who ch them the right to agadn order the nau Vuen quiet th roughout the 'tea! ae se nd it to a survival of W %•O V W removed, but the city took • ; , tq c �A. "my k it his busineim), was Vdth a u - .= . all "�" ' nor aeon. '- I • • I __mo_u o .m • •1i t v m -- a remaining that ! ot! - f . -, � , four msmbers. fact, in edict, • ; . the . - 81 D THAT ,TIME ,� �• . , , , r :,�- •,�a ga ve R` "ba'ch, a# each cmncg neighbors have • prossured the During the member, veto - rs? go ce s; s��e or over the council to &res to remove through hie Iawye red east. d that " outdoo vem both the a and the Ooln�e. power and voW4. against the me.:' un i r�rroning, which � aired a 4/5 sales at�k. � . •K • � ,. ,Howevor, when 'tkze co � ,l _ Dior to the may nee ing9 - - _ ' ned, a motion by vote of the dl. re luctant to action on anther nate •ths •gam ?4 for ail • ordere&.the • ' -~ �` th o I ss u e, the lk bf steckrd. ''t en AN L'"I OR -sales area on aaighb s P to i nset in sA � ,tabled then land* untU June 1. af` the , Not gsrdaa anger n Pm'� g effort t6.-raw vir'�'�heir awn con- ' F+�llowing � char table, l�irb lot has n d seasonal Mete. At thdt` 4me,`,ar�d again in r*iteratea that hsi P� * the for many years.. Nonetheless, rtegotiataT e : eighbar�. prro- � I I SO � • - up inv+s ti 1�a conditi ._ mule t�o un�e�I men y� •' ■ mr- permit - � - tit allows t ' to :. sales aroa on t bar_ uker_Rud,_ h- it "� think the ne3g • the lot, of t . the" 'outdoor a i' g •� "� � h � lie c#t • �• .,, , . .. bogs should: be ' l'iapp y with what is nrnn der they y iuhange for , removing the. they've got with• the ; Darden p g partrae realimd it is *rags. Dew was ' unwilling ta: because '' Old be a lot illegal because the. apmnt ni g rifer) 1. ng accept that coin promise. n thr d es rsot allow , Wes t viy, In its re to the council on w , .:•l. eald his ng'�: 4 ce two evf,n with the CUP. m 3 the city staff =•ecomma P ' ; '- d ijil• eetin M. '� - Tharefdr+e,- -'Dii#r- asked the ale ' the day�r� after t . , ' " g� council tai churn t aerie on the i'°q . 1 viate Norberg. ~tar :Ahought an '° a problems by cba�rg the CUP ,. ' are a of pares lot 'whas his odate .:, - a Oct �' Al� .. and the zoning to mm 'wail 't out doter lea are; to bu�n�s � a - outdoor sales area and ' '° me�rcial (BO • odate tit both the ou � �' �� '•�.. �, ,,,�,, :: • , f on ;urn operati irs ' Be aai d that •lie' would wait i g o Duri.nit the hearin John However, the octdoor - calcs •" be aun and Carl 14 . W . rg, the until .the June 1 meeting before ev ' ' � �' .. �� d � taking further - cation, but ang area, eft prior to the 1�ay la wyer s repressntin ,Degl. " vote, had become 1W of the major the neighb&s, r+e"ectively, took gssted, If tlioy,. (ci council. mem- issue and more of a, bargaining turns making their Uses. and o Viers) keep refuririg t� do �y point in nWtiatimm over anther 'rebutting in courtroom - like► style.. thing, we vn ll • have to go into a Dage Can Center �controv y. Daubney tried' to vlrxe the court and .get the court too ford cil th . � �r��sts �� the �ty to enforce its own o�rdr- . d -. • +e►nces. IN NOVEMB iLm, OW receiving a buildiag. permit ftm A A A i shottl ; 11� an jo~wood, Inge uni a Lp p Ilep bo alloyed to st wren rpew I ; to the Cow - ! � par lQt . � • , . b►uslivese," Duey 1'Y IWL A ome. . CO In I November, before the W Commenting on what 10 j ;said 9aMP Was coazp14ta, the r' would be changing the lags to nei hbors confirmed I e and accoWIm da A J broker, g g ...., �,. they city. They c�tn•ed the. CUF Worberg countered, is Is the that allowB the parking lot doae kind of bootatraWng that I don't not allow the garvpb think a court would andorse• PAGE 09 16 07/15/1999 11:27 9415058612 e say's hc* 11 rue r~ r gY ar $taft W2 rl op.. pa od f �?-t Geo'r'ge De lays h e dwo the 6o -fbot n- rar . I touched off a n hood to in late 1986 and led to a la , that he won in dwriet Cwh later ket in the Agile Cotn'tr The decided f� tb$ , tit the Maplewo�l C had bees actg with I its Sreral maths +earlier When it Doge to tear down the gamge. I J s He'd dohM building the garage int ied *6 bold a vats - 1 eem In parker lot -� -- �e ter ,a of the y's clericl staff him a buAJ&AW pert - -- - . cleric- WO an* - W Parking lot itmf wn a prtvil ' that ,bail granted the M , center in the -fog of a 17i use 'die for lawudeWty den qse: . - - - -- - -- -- -- - - - - -- Selbe cl - - -_ ctioa - on the co aMdf_ - -- - - - - - � W the court a with the 4 6 that lege was respon sible for � it, the Pleaaa of Doila /2 PAGE 10 St. 1 D�s�nBt - r � y I e ro 11is s o re ove gaT4 9P o nti n uad from um peg o J ; I and ms's' c+itional twe alt, sanits • • �� . . ., .. , . � �,::; b� said, a e permit bad : t d to his f ath+er, Al t M remain in, , also , cast his ` '' Ot+e. He added, "If I bi � , � . - t his +� *& Y , ��� , it w ont fo•the � ow •�, d - - -hm'g �t thug, said awl Btdt, as bo lain laur, the three CO At rp to Ow own the uher. ,.,. > • R melt wbo voted tM baRl :ea cane -last at a city doncit Ming after A . _ g, ii way shared •+ • votes do ramie t ruin memMr .. Grp P +�h - oast a ���� , . by lit J'o� � • � p+�t i stn on aril e+cuYt reheri�e Oman sod l member Nor love; dad he decided the only ghee � p But t - y " -.- a vote that Wed as d�atgoation O $ate Dege s designates as a , ec�e of ' in � ovd shat a °a t opted . g lot: il foot deep sipflit behind the shop, � � ew �em A N plays nl foot, not just three � ti' - � that It w ge Ima put• u a and dis � , du�r #bo evmrn�r spoaths. member' was amt trade -oif. , That, too, Was - a vioiaift of t parking dot rnUt, the complaining brie hbors hive obJect- and Maplewood 's C attorneys have reed. It Dege rtes uW W the ovtdoor es area to stay in 1 -m—� and that ew med a majori of city ovacil rtimbem Jai M the Lou=U im W a W & of Charges to allow Dfte to -kee the sales a and the t 0 b to the Aft 1"t Wedk b" a and has said he woaid owtinna to oppose them. No one was we What stand couadt new. come WOWd take, until a motion was intriodu to amend the &mix d - Utica on the City's comprehem#" plan ftoin firWdestial low dewi t if • ` - "Who I ray for this I ram on a platform M. � �.i ��l�do i�J * iion�ij iiM`Aiii `�i is At his nKliest, his atto4A Jft Dan told the oo "W. Die wants to w ft bb ri*at for the +� d regmts the c agy be rata sat W the 11VAWO't of the city cm obam , his bead4w his ham, w the c cil members argued amm solace to buine In to the OffW, ter a half houes further bennim of Witter, ti a to' take it unto , Sp 17 l owe W c� x to e e dis te sett f - rem o P ed by Se e , . . P i! jya '- t� ti r De g e challenged the order in - ii.. -.�- - - t • r - ,l O -Wri"r . ::. Ailie ', '1w 1w I supp0� 4 Tt shad W the I� 1'lt #O ea cause, attempted to water down Arwndmw@6 lei's just fipisk4as th e garage i n place. The city Thu find chaptr'in this - b%ii� the effort to force th* garage thing and get an with other-' Appealed that ruling and $arty standing Pop Garden Contsr removal with a motion 19 11 0 ding no$$ - I would hop* that Frain tlds yaw ginned a reversal of the oontrove g a' U ti the to Sept. 30 Y : w Ad wh th dmw bar moan." original findings. That reversal N b a _ FF y been t played out. - The report from pity staff, Jag's motion also moiled for ' didWt order Clue glarag� re � toed, Diwigg a special meedng last eebeing .a compr miso ies&od - the lack of a second. but upheld the vitf s ri to do Wednesday night, dune 1 the between lawyers for Dep and res- Council Uember: Norm I i " Maplewood City Council offered idential neighbors of the garden Anderosn,. wbo svPpors Dege`s' owner George Degas • to . move a • center who b ave opposed the eause - considered a motion � Y: � tiw !. the - �a a garrage he qon a n the cam- , garagoe, s ated Sept So of this allow the garage too stand � � ad raised a. sec � ': n IZ penny parking lot by Sept. g0. year as the deadline. reluctantly. mGve d to fo i to- - and is$u a of 00 Council mend =shoo aped a Council dembox Gary Bastian, removal by the Sept. 198& � i ha��a sa Bondi rezmng Qan a poac ova of the sun wbo has elute rea moral of the deadline. 'the motio passed s F � g >ti anal lot, which assures the company garage. .eras obviously frustrated y. _ . U" pernOt a�low.ing the outdoor will be allowed to oan#asue its out by Juker s effort U6 *xtand the T}u sound then mousey salsa sree, the city realized it had brvk�en its own fl,dinanoe . In v - side Wes of plants indefinitely. deadline by 11 years. Bastian sppr�a�ned rezoning a wn portion t - , However, condss�tent with the - gaickly moved to table Juker "s of the Dep Garden park- � permit debate which has surrounded motion. .ett his motion failed lot, themby' asamrir g sec_ ighbo�rs 1 for o m - inatin th,e isles axe lout Ike � eVW7 aspect" of the issue froma its four lack of a smand, took . and part - of the comp i see �. e tha � - beginning nearly two yearns Juker to tmxk over her i-: reached between Dep an g'? . t would t'o�r�oe h im o u t off' busl 04 the ..+ass wom not =a& with- _ . _ . resi dentiel ne ighbors. The iruQ mess e . coin out some unusual maneuvering *1 FIND Fran' a motion . a e�sulres DrejWs isles of plants is a pronri se re o by the city council.. fiivolous aivandment," Bastian -� small area outside tho garden �, - _ _ - and ratted t council, called bawlaw LO ' '•" ►` sex, : t el imina ti on of the g - Ik . �'' _ ' - ` in returns for the neighbors drop. 9 on - z iv}UTC `,ping their ar gument against the beca*akwars bf true Doge cent ro►- outdo w saes area. veray in November 198.6 when E N the le'el mod pf' the garage he ?mod .1'O.LLOWI G DIS,MYD b►uilt Douse �is pe motor ;.an the pmalonged issue,, Council ion". m— Se al ghl ors MUM to : throw all tb* Dfte maurf away the structure and, after , some : safely now? I b ave book s an °i � the city valaaed it. had baQks of it. erroneo�ly imuued a building per- 't . -+ mlt for t11,e prage, The pity cQut1- I i i cil after much debate, ordered m Dege to remove the garage by the following spring. , MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA AUGUST 16, 1999 V. NEW BUSINESS B. Dege Garden Center Conditional Use Permit Revision (831 Century Avenue North) Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. He said that the CUP was due for review and that Mr. Dege, the owner, was asking for a revision to his CUP for a temporary chain -link - fence he had already installed. 'ft. Roberts said a neighbor filed a complaint about the addition of the fenced -in area because they were concerned that if this was allowed by the city it would start the wheels to further expansion of Mr. Dege's commercial center nearer to the residential area. Mr. Roberts said staff recommends denial of the request to expand the site by allowing the fenced -in display area. Staff would recommend continuation of the conditional use permit subject to two conditions relating to the removal of the outdoor storage area. Mr. Roberts answered questions from the commissioners. Commissioner Thompson asked staff if a permit was required to ut u a fence on a residential p p dental property. Staff said if the fence is six feet high or less a permit is not required. Commissioner Trippler asked if the city can levy a fine or fee against Mr. Dege for repeated g g p ed violations of his CUP. Mr. Roberts said that the city would have to hold a ublic hearing first p g and the outcome could be either a revocation of the conditional use permit or being put on probation. g p p on. Staff said that only the district courts can levy fines. Director of Community Development ment P Coleman said that the city would have to go through the review P rocess to revoke the conditional use permit, and if the CUP was revoked and Mr. Dege did not comply then he would g District Court be cited and it would o to Dist ' p Y . Commissioner Trippler wanted to clarify that the first conditional use ermit is to allow parking p p g in an R1 zone and if the owner continues to meet the revisions that were originally set he could continue to park in the R1 zone. Staff said that the revision requested was to allow the outdoor fenced storage area. Staff said that if the owner doesn't try to expand or cause other problems p p ems then they could continue to park in the R -1 zone. Chairperson Fischer asked staff if there were any other instances in the city where there is a commercial parking lot on an R1 zone with a conditional use permit. Staff said that if the city few. Staff said the does there are very y couldn't recall processing one in the last ten years. Staff said that Mr. Dege was not present because he was out of town and wouldn't be back until next week. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Denial of the conditional use permit revision requested by George Dege to add a fenced -in outdoor g g o storage area for plant materials on a portion of the parking lot at 831 N. Century Avenue. Denial is based on the following reasons: 1. Approval would narrow the easterly drive lane in the parking lot to a width of 18 feet —code requires 24 feet for atwo -way drive aisle. (The drive aisle is nonconforming already at 23 feet wide.) Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 08 -16 -99 2. Approval of this fencing would allow a material storage and retail use on property zoned R1 (single dwelling residential). This would be a violation of the R1 zoning requirements. 3. Since the proposed fenced storage area is in the drive aisle it would potentially obstruct traffic flow. B. Continuation of the conditional use permit for Dege Garden Center, at 831 N. Century Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. Mr. Dege shall remove the outdoor, plant - material storage area behind the building within one month of this council action. 2. If Mr. Dege does not remove this fencing as directed, the city council shall reconsider the continuation of this permit. If Mr. Dege removes the fencing as required within one month, the city council shall review this permit again in five years. Commissioner Trippler seconded. Ayes all The motion passed. .. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Community Development Director Colema SUBJECT: CHAPTER 1306 OF BUILDING CODE DATE: August 9, 1999 N60000 INTRODUCTION Agenda item N3 dct3on co d e dd Date On August 2, 1999, the city council reviewed the city's requirement for buildings in Maplewood to meet Chapter 1306 of the Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC). This code (Sec. 9- 24(3)a) requires most commercial and institutional buildings in Maplewood to have Fire Protection Systems (sprinklers) when they are built or when the owner remodels them. Several property owners and developers have voiced conce ern over this addendum to the MSBC. One of the owners of the Archer Heights apartments Maplewood �� i g p s sent a letter to the city asking Ma p to re- evaluate the intent of Chapter 1306. (See the letter from Teesdale and Asso ciates on pages 4 and 5.) DISCUSSION It is staff's understanding that back in the mid- 1980's Maplewood • p ood adopted Chapter 1306. This code lowers the threshold for sprinkler systems in new buildings but also m • structures if the o . g mandates sprinklers in existing occupancy changes or additions /renovations are made. The original ginal intent of Chapter 1306 was to help smaller and rural communities with less sophisticated fire departments or inadequate water supplies. Fire chiefs saw this as a method to control fire loss and related costs. According to Tom Joachim, State Building Official, ted Cha to g cial, about 25 adopted Chap 1306. Maplewood and Maple Grove were two of the largest cities Maple Grove has since g es that adopted it; Ma p nce repealed this code. Fire chiefs saw Chapter 1306 as a way to het control fire los opposed to h p s at the developer's expense as 0 pp having to buy more expensive equipment, more firefighters, more station round se g � s, etc. (For additional background, e the letter from Community Development Director to State Building Official (page 6) and his response about Chapter 13 p 06 on pages 7 and 8.) • The municipality has greater control over fire rotection costs. s. • It prevents the erosion of tax base -- 60% of the businesses • on the same site. destroyed by fire do not rebuild • Saves fire protection costs, such as, fire department costs municipal p ,municipal infrastructures, insurance rates, business interruption. • It provides immediate fire protection thus reducing he risk to firefighters. refighters. • Reduces fire cost. • It brings existing buildings to fire standards as if they were constructed today. Disadvantages • Some communities feel the impact of additional costs of sprinklering to existing businesses doing additions is negative and unfair. • Cost of sprinklering is very high, especially in remodeling and retrofit situations. • Chapter 1306 is very rigid and there is no opportunity to do "other equivalents" for fire suppression. • Many architects and builders commit to projects in Maplewood before they know we have Chapter 1306. (They pay for building plans, site plans and other application fees.) Most communities do have Chapter 1306. This results in scaled down projects and bad feelings about the process. • Code review for remodeling projects takes 30 -50% more time than new construction due to complexity of building code and subjectivity of interpretation of the code. _ __Projects are abandoned.,.-- or__quality. or__size,_are reduced because of unforeseen sprinklering costs. Oot Staff finds that there are four options available for this situation (there may be others): • Keep Chapter 1306 and continue imposing the sprinklering requirements when additions or improvements are proposed. • Temporarily repeal this ordinance. The State Department of Administration tells us that rule changes are in the works that would give cities more discretion and flexibility. This will likely not be completed for two years. • Treat the issue as an appeal to the Board of Appeals (just as we did with Bulk Storage). However, the appeal process is costly and, in most instances, projects would not meet the hardship or variance criteria. Bulk Storage was a very unique situation. • Repeal the ordinance. At the council /manager workshop meeting on August 2, 1999, the council directed staff to prepare an ordinance that would temporarily repeal the use of Chapter 1306 in Maplewood. This was with the understanding that the city council would review this matter again after the state prepares and finalizes the rule changes to Chapter 1306. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the ordinance on page 9. This ordinance temporarily repeals the city's requirement that builders and developers meet the requirements of Chapter 1306 (Fire Protection Systems) of the Minnesota State Building Code. This ordinance also directs the city to review the use of Chapter 1306 after the state completes the rule changes to the Chapter. 2 p:lcom_dvptlordlchap 1306. mem Attachments 1. 6 -29 -99 letter from Teasdale and Associates 2. 12 -14 -98 letter to Scott McLellan 1 1 -5 -99 letter from Scott McLellan 4. Code Amendment Attachment 1 JUN 30 1994 TEASDALE & ASSOCIATES 5407 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 6 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 612 -922 -4405 FAX 922 -8351 June 29, 1999 Mike McQuire City Manager City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Maple Pond homes Dear Mr. McQuire: I am one of the owners of Maple Pond Homes (formerly Archer Heights - Maplewood). We purchased the property in late 1998 and are doing over $3.5 million in rehabilitation on the property. We have been working with the City of Maplewood since late summer 1998 in coordinating our renovations. A major thrast afour renovation was to modernize and upgrade the exterior appearance of Maple Pond Homes. A major portion of this renovation was the redoing of the main entry way to our 99 unit building (the complex is 168 units). The current entry way is a fairly dark and uninviting entrance. We also believe it to be a security liability. Our desire was to have our main office at the entry for ease of entry and for security purposes. We attempted for over two months to obtain approvals for our planned renovation. We have abandoned our plans for the original improved entry in March 1999. We have reconciled ourselves to a much more subdued plan. The plan we are now going ahead with is not nearly as effective as our original idea. The obstacle in our path was Chapter 1306 of your building code. This is being interpreted to - mean that the addition of even one square foot to a multifamily building triggers the need to - provide an automatic sprinkler system in the entire building. The cost of this addition to the property would most likely exceed $500,000. This is because of the basic installation plus the abatement practices we would have to invoke in working in our ceilings which contain minute amounts of asbestos in the texture. This amount of money is not available to the project. We have a low rent project and are required to keep it that way. We do not have the ability to simply raise rents to pay for improvements (nor do most owners). The work we are doing now will determine the nature of the building for the foreseeable future. 4 The City's use of this chapter of the code will result in the property continuing with what is essentially a bad design. We totally understand the intent of 1306, however, we can't recommend enough altering that chapter. The intent of the code is fine - obviously to get sprinkling into older buildings. The problem is that retro-fitting an older, existing building is inevitably a very expensive proposition. The economics will rarely be present to justify this. The end result may be desired improvements not being done at all. In our case, an opportunity to correct bad building design has been lost. We have done our best to redesign in such a way as to not add square footage to our property. We will function with an entry which is far short of ideal. We are also being forced to add our second elevator into existing space (i.e. "not one additional square foot "). This forces us to once again design in a much less appropriate way. The opportunity here may be for Chapter 1306 to be re- evaluated. We don't think the original intent was that increasing our entry way by a small amount of square footage in a 99 unit apartment building should trigger a $500,000 plus fire suppression system. We would suggest some means to allow flexibility into the process and individual cases be evaluated on their own merits. We make this request for properties which may follow us in the future. Our funding mechanisms us to move -ahead with our rehabilitation and we do not have the - luxury - -of any- more time in this matter. We know that in our case an opportunity has been missed for us and Maplewood. We don't believe this will be the first. Other owners considering improvements will probably go through the same process we have. We urge you to use our case as an opportunity to re- evaluate this chapter and determine if our outcome was really what was intended. Sincerely, Harold Teasdale cc: Melinda Coleman Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 HT /mm He MBG A:McQuire.sam Attachment 2 ':MAPLEWOOD Together We Can December 14, 1998 Scott McLellan Plan Review Supervisor Department of Administration Building Codes & Standards Division 408 Metro Square Building 121 7th Place East St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Scott: _._____Thank you for taking the time to talk to Marge and me last Thursday about Chapter 1306 of the Minnesota Building Code. As you know, we have a developer, John Fallen, who wishes to construct an 11,250- square -foot addition to an existing structure without adding an automatic sprinklering system. Our code consultant, Duane Grace, and Marge Ostrom have informed Mr. Fallen that this will be required to comply with Chapter 1306. Duane Grace has indicated that the best way to assist Mr. Fallen in removing the sprinklering requirement would be for the city to repeal its adoption of Chapter 1306 or have council grant an exception for this case only. I may wish to present these options to the city council but would like some background information. This is where I could use your help. Would you please provide - information or comments on the following: How Chapter 1306 came into existence. What was the main objective? Is it necessary/recommended for cities Like _Maplewood with a fire department? How do other cities "get around" similar situations? Finally, do you think it - sense for a city like Maplewood to repeal this chapter? Would there be any "down sides" in doing this? Would it be better to grant an exception? If so, by the city council or the building official? It seems to me that there should be some mechanism for flexibility with the building and fire codes. I would welcome any suggestions and comments you can offer. Thank you for your help. MELINDA COLEMAN - DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNI DEVELOPMENT 612-770-4560 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1 830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 ' Attachment 3 ` SO � Department of Administration. January 5, 1998 Ms. Melinda Coleman, Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Mkt 55109 Subject: Our response to your questions of December 14, 1998 regarding Chapter 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems Regarding your first series of questions: The original basis for incorporating this optional chapter into the state building code (SBC) was to provide on -site fire protection for those municipalities that have less than adequate "local fire suppression capabilities" (1306.0100 Subp.2) e.g. fire - fighting equipment, available staff, response time, geography, water supply, etc. Although this basis has been obscured over time, without it there is no legislative justification for the State to maintain different standards of fire protection. See Minnesota Statute 16B.59 where it states that the purpose of the code is to, ...provide basic and uniform performance standards, establish reasonable safeguards, . . . and provide for the use of modern methods, devices, materials, and techniques which will in part tend to lower construction costs. The effect of the original intent created a standard that requires sprinkler systems to be installed at a lower square footage threshold and in more occupancies than that required of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Also, in acknowledging this need for greater fire protection, (based on local fire suppression capabilities) there are more trigger points for required sprinkler installation than those included in the UBC, such as with the example you are faced with when constructing an addition. As we discussed, Chapter 9 of the UBC already requires the installation of automatic sprinkler systems in many buildings of various occupancies and sizes. Therefore, the basic and cost effective standard for fire protection found in the UBC currently Applies to all municipalities that have adopted the SBC. This is the same standard used 1111 much of the United States. Regarding recommendations for Maplewood: We encourage municipalities to periodically re- examine the few optional chapters of the SBC that they may have adopted to determine if they are still relevant and necded. Based on the number of uestions received, this is probably most often suggested with optional q p Y gg Building Codes and Standards Division, 408 Metro Square Building, 121 7th Place East, St. Paul, MN 55101 -2181 Voice: 651.296.3639, Fax: 651.297.1973; TTY: 1.800.627.3529 and ask for 296.9929 Chapter 1306. In evaluating this chapter for adoption, we believe municipalities need to seriousl y consider id the implications. i For example, if there are areas in the jurisdiction where municipal water s not available but commercial development is permitted, a conscience decision must be made to accept the fact that if 1306 is adopted, new affected buildings may need an expensive on -site water supply system for the sprinkler system. This in turn may determine if development occurs. This is also the point where we probably receive most of the questions regarding the chapter. Regarding granting exceptions: As Chapter 1306 is a state law of building construction that is Y ut into effect b local ordinance, it cannot be selectively enforced, neither by the P governing body nor the building official. Although the building code does recognize alternate designs in providing equivalent. protection, it is difficult to envision a legitimate equivalent alternate to an automatic fire protection system. The bottom line is that the law does not require municipalities to justify their adoption of 1306. If it is adopted into local law, it has the full effect of requiring the installation of sprinkler systems into a greater number of buildings than the states adopted Uniform Building Code. There is also no question that these systems will protect buildings from fire to a greater degree than unsprinklered buildings. Our recommendation is that your city deliberates the merits continuing administration -of- Chapter 1306. This should be an open discussion among your building and fire officials as well as with your lawmakers and affected building owners. As a result however, if Chapter 1306 remains in effect, it should be fully enforced. If it is no longer needed or desired, it should be repealed. We hope this information is helpful. If you have further questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerel , c Scott D. Mc el an, Supervisor Plan Review and Regional Services Cc: - Marge Ostrom Building Official E Attachment 4 ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE CITY CODE ABOUT THE USE OF CHAPTER 1306 OF THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: Section 1. This amendment changes Section 9- 24(3)a as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): qjF Id , a. The city council temoora[k repeals the use of Chapter - • ter 1306 Special Fire Protection Systems, tems in Ma lewood. The cit council shall review the Chapter 1306 S ecial Fire Protec ' use of tion S stems in Maplewood after Minnesota com letes revisions he State of - -- ns to the Cha .ter or December 1 2001 whichever comes first. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 11999. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes — Nays — 0 AGENDA ITEM K I f AGENDA REPORT TO: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager Aq� j on b Ca T uncl l . FROM: Michael A. Ericson, Assistant to the City Mana g .. End orsed........ RE,: Recommendation to purchase Corbey property for Open S Y p p tY p pace Dad DATE: August 16, 1999 INTRODUCTION At its final meeting earlier this year the new Open Space Acquisition Committee approved q pp and prioritized a list of five properties which it would like the city o purchase with the remaining tY p funds from the Open Space Program. The Corbey property was ranked #S and according p �Y to the new process for purchase, I proceeded with approval of the site selection from the city manager . tY er g Planning Commission, and Parks and Recreation Commission. After the Corbey p roperty y p p rty was approved I began negotiations with the property owner to purchase it. BACKGROUND The new Open Space Acquisition Committee was selected by the city manager last fall and approved by the city council to begin the process of selecting parcels of open space land which would be purchased with the remaining funds from the Open Space Referendum. After a number of meetings the new committee selected a total of five parcels of land which met the criteria of the program and I proceeded with the acquisition process. I began negotiations with the owner of the Corbey property and together we explored a number of issues which were important to him first of which was his desire to keep the parcel from developers and preserve it as Open Space Land and the last of which was a sale price acceptable to he and his family members. We had many meetings over a number months which were necessary since some members of his family felt the parcel was an extremely valuable piece of property. Subsequently, his family ordered an appraisal in addition to the city's appraisal to substantiate the value of the land. After much discussion, Mr. Eugene Corbey and his family members agreed to accept the city's offer of $144,000 for the 17.43 acre parcel of land located at the corner State Highway 61 and County Road C. RECOMMENDATION The city council should approve the purchase of the Corbey 17.43 acre parcel of land at a price of $144,000 contingent on the standard criteria previously established by the city attorney. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Changes - Highway 6 g g y 1 and County Road C LOCATION: West of Highway 61, north and south of Count Road Y C DATE: August 3, 1999 INTRODUCTION The city council directed the planning commission and arks and recreation ' . purchase of a p eation commission to review the p property for open space. It is about a 17.5 -acre property est of Highway 61, north of County Road C known as the e Corbey property. (See the maps on pages 4 and 5.) City staff has negotiated a price of about $150,000 for the 17.5 acres. State law requires that the planning commission advise the council whether proposed public acquisitions follow the comprehensive plan. Maplewood has not shown this site on the land use plan for open space. As such, we have scheduled a public hearing to consider changing the land use plan for this area. The change would be from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). (See the existing and proposed land use plan maps on pages 6-and 7.) City staff also is proposing a change to the land use plan for the park and ride lot on the southwest corner of Highway 61 and County Road C. This change would be from M -1 (light manufacturing) to G (government). - BACKGROUND Open Space Program On November 2, 1993, the voters approved the open ace referendum. to sell u to million p p dum. This vote authorized the city p $5 million in general obligation bonds to buy and for open ac Y p space. The Open Space Committee recommended that the city ouncil consider Y nsider buying open space from a list of nineteen sites. This list included the fourteen top -rated sites in Maplewood and five additional sites that the committee had rated first ' p ve wide. in their respective neighborhoods, but not city- The city council authorized the staff to buy eight sites. These include Site 153A (Priory), Site 142 (Frost Avenue and English Street), Site 161 B (Kayser), Site 108 (Pearson), Site 116 (Spoon Lake), Site 116(a) (Kuslich), Site 168C (Grandview Addition) and Site 103C (County Road D and Woodlynn). Maplewood has closed on all these sites. On October 14, 1996, the council decided to buy he 6.5 -acre Re en Y gnier property east of Arcade Street for open space. On November 12, 1996, the city council decided to buy ite 1688 . Y (Stielow) on the northwest corner of Carver Avenue and Sterling Street for about $146,000 for open ace. A 600 00 p p After this purchase, there is about $ 0 left from the original $5 million to spend on en s p p pace. On July 13, 1998, the city council adopted a olic for the purchase additional ro ert . (See th p Y p ase of additional open space p p y e policy on page 8.) DISCUSSION Corbey Property Open Space The 1992 Open Space Committee ranked this site 32nd out of the 67 sites they reviewed and second out of the seven in this neighborhood. In 1999, the Open Space Committee ranked this site fifth out of the five they reviewed. (See the memo from Cliff Aichinger starting on page 9.) This site has several advantages: • There are slopes, wetlands and trees on and near the site that would be protected • The property is a good economic value • There is easy access to the area • The site is next to an existing wetland and near Kohlman Lake thus expanding the open space corridor in the area Park and Ride Lot The proposed change to the land use plan for the park and ride lot is to make the plan conform with the use of the property. Since the state owns and uses the site, staff is recommending a . change to the land use plan to G (government) for this site. COMMITTEE ACTION On August 2, 1999, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed land use plan changes. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 13. This resolution changes the land use plan for the undeveloped area west of Highway 61, north of County Road C. The change is from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). The city should make this change because: 1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The purchase would help preserve a variety of natural features on and near this site, including slopes, wetlands and trees. 3. The property is a good economic value. 4. There is easy access to the area. 5. The site is next to an existing wetland and near Kohiman Lake thus expanding the open space corridor in the area. The city shall not make the land use plan change for the city -owned property until after the city closes on the property. 2 B. Adopt the resolution on page 14. This resolution changes the land use plan for the park and ride lot on the southwest corner of Highway 61 and County Road C. This change is from M -1 (light manufacturing) to G (government). The city should make this change because: 1. The site is public property owned by the State of Minnesota. 2. The State of Minnesota uses this site for a public park and ride lot. 3. There are no plans to develop the property for commercial or. manufacturing uses. p:sec4 /openln11.mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property.Line /Zoning Map 3. Existing Land Use Map 4. Proposed Land Use Map 5. 7 -13 -98 Open Space Process Policy 6. 4 -5 -99 memo from Cliff Aichinger 7. Land Use Plan Change Resolution (R -1 to OS) 8. Land Use Plan Change Resolution (M -1 to G) 3 Attachment 1 VADNAI HEIGHTS -.000W 1 61 If Q COUNTY RD. D lt.l 3 4. � 1. Z � 1. SIhAWT CT. � 2 OOUMRYVIEIN CIR. J 3. DULUTH CT. 4 �. 3 . 4. lYD1A AVE. j BE/W AVE O I t; �/ /x'111 ST. JOHN'S - BLVD. r3 Y 4 IAarifi m z Cl � Pond U �c KoMma, � Genois �� i0k° ... LL,I Lake OHLMAN AVE. � COUNTY - � C J El 3 .. BEIiECRESI OR Oft- 4 OR � S IETi1DMN OR GT. 4th' S CT. i CONNOR CO A � � DQIOhtT j 3 teROM / � oE,aoeR vE. � a '�'� AVE � � j CT. LGMMWANSS T MISAVE. � GERVNS AVE �. -- � (.RIWONaEW AVE � P te ' VIKMIG DR. COPE �ERREN AVE � . LOW AM I I %NO - � • �i LAURIE CT. B BUMS ELORIDGE VIZ Z. � LN21C �j a. � Loke Co. < RD. � ��;' g �uwo RD* � �� cr. t� o � JUNCTION AVE � w�or..c / (1) CHNA� � (1 � AV � t' .%F. a � AVE LAURIE RD. V LARK �sn � ee LAURi �` � $ CO. e t� A AVE. � 0 W. � ELDR IAVF. uasr B iii BURKE AVE. Q 1 AVE � � sum , - # rare a.m IDLE LOCATION MAP 4 4 N Attachment 2 f --., KOHLMAN LAKE-- .F (bl 4 ..— I L .34p) '' xi .94 a c ao� � � Ap '41 - Al. O 4 so Lu 1215 LL PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 4 Sod i.70 I h 10 Total a.flhw V. f4^Tldft^L. 26ATTILIt aq 0A*C C. r KSTP PROPERTY • q? w 71) 1 too V 3, VE- it n.r , w w�...� AC &W.W � . �,.� fin) ` wwwvn PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 4 Sod i.70 I h 10 Total a.flhw V. f4^Tldft^L. 26ATTILIt aq 0A*C C. r KSTP PROPERTY • too K 6.6. CO. &W.W Attachment 3 minor collector cc C cc .i �J m v J U O O O � ct 0 Rd. C �ty v.? — vr�F1 JrhVG G = GOVERNMENT R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS R-3(M) = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL M -1 = LIGHT MANUFACTURING P Gervais Highway 36 LAND USE MAP (EXISTING) � minor Beam Ave. collector I y i N Attachment 4 � 1 minor collector i• 0 Cu c� c cc U m i minor � collector Beam Ave. -T y T rt Rd. C U CD 0 o� a! E1 0 1 0 U i Q Gervais Highway 36 LAND USE MAP (PROPOSED) G = GOVERNMENT R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS R -3(M) = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL M -1 = LIGHT MANUFACTURING %t-#^r It E N 4:; � Attachment 5 PROCESS FOR PURCHASE.. OF ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE PROPERTY 1. Council reviews potential open space parcel(s) to determine which warrant further consideration. 2. After consultation with Mayor /Council, City Manager appoints a committee made up of three members including one informed citizen, one City employee with experience dealing with land and/or environmental issues and one individual from an outside environmental agency /group with a similar background. The committee's role will be review all available information concerning the proposed property and provide the City Manager with a written evaluation further delineating value to the Open Space program. 3. City Manager will review and prepare a preliminary assessment and recommendation for each property for Council review and consideration. 4.- Concurrently, the report will be given to the Park and Planning Commissions for their review and comment. A public hearing will be held by the Planning Commission and - - -- public testimony taken by the Park Commission. 5. City Council will review the report and additional comments as provided and determine if the process should proceed to the next level. 6. City Manager will obtain an independent appraisal of the property and will confer with the Mayor and Council regarding acquisition strategy including price and purchase agreement provisions. 7. City Manager will negotiate price and conditions with potential sellers and present Council with negotiated agreements. 8. After taking public testimony regarding the proposed property, Council may direct the City Manager to draft final closing papers and complete acquisition. 8 Adopted: 7/13/98 Attachment 6 Ramsey - Washington Metro m o. District 0mo 0 a April 5, 1999 MEMO TO: Mike Erickson FROM: Cliff Aichinger C SUBJECT: Open Space Committee Recommendations. 1902 EaSi County Road B Maplewood, P,,/IN 55109 (651) 704 -2089 fax (651) 704 -2092 e-mail: rwmwd @mtn.org The Open Space Committee consisting of myself, -Jan Grew- Hayman, and Dominic Ramacier, met on Friday, April 2, 1999. We met for two reasons; first, to visit and discuss the possible addition of the Schreier property on Maryland and McKnight Road, and second, to discuss our ranking recommendations for the parcels including the Scheier property. Our. inspection of the Schreier property was very beneficial. For Jan and myself, it confirmed .the value-and-importance of the site for greenway corridor connections to - - -- - other open space areas in Maplewood. For Dominic, it was valuable to expose him to the site and give him a sense of it's potential value. After viewing the site and discussing it's potential value to the Maplewood Open Space system the committee members felt the Schreier site should be ranked as one of the top two sites to acquire. The potential of obtaining State Greenways Grant funding for this site allows Maplewood to consider acquiring the greenway even though it may be a higher cost than was considered for other open space sites. Based on this conclusion, the committee would recommend allocating the available funds as follows: Site Rank Site Name Estimated cost 1 Bradley Oaks $130,000 1 Schreier Property Corridor $200,000 3 Schlumka $95,000 4 Kayser Property $100,000 5 Corbe $130,000 Total 1 $655,000.00 The committee was unanimous in our ranking of the above properties. We were tied in our ranking of the top two sites. The Schlumka property was ranked third for its location adjacent to Ramsey County bluffland and Fish Creek open space. The committee felt the Schlumka property would be good to protect and keep from being developed into several 9 Memo to Mike Ericson 4/5/99 Page 2 residential lots. The Kayser property was ranked fourth. It is valuable due to its adjacency with the existing Maplewood Open Space, but does not connect to any additional corridors or open space. The Corbey site strongly considered and is desirable to keep from development. However, it was felt that the current wetland regulation will keep significant development off this site and acquisition may not needed. If development of this site were more imminent, the committee favored acquiring the site. The committee feels that the Corby property could be dropped if the funds are required for one of the other sites (if the purchase price exceeds the estimated value). Schreier Site Analysis Rather than trying to acquire the entire site, the committee recommends that the City consider acquiring a buffer along the creek and the remnant property along Maryland. This acquisition plan provides the corridor connection and buffer protection and allows for reasonable development of the prime value portions of the property. We feel that this open space protection will add significant value to the remaining property and, if developed properly, could create high value residential sites adjacent to this corridor. The piece along Maryland would have little potential for development and could significantly infringe on the open space value of the protected corridor. After acquisition of the buffer there would only be 1.38 of land left along Maryland in a triangular shaped parcel. Any development on this parcel would visually intrude on the corridor and may cause environmental effects during construction. The committee felt this could be added to the acquisition and made into a trailhead or restored into a more valuable open space area. Although the Schreier site is not a willing seller, we feel it is a key site that warrants some effort on the part of the City to pursue. There appears to be some potential of working with the Planning staff to negotiate a development plan with the - owner that __would allow fora significant development on the site as well as protect the creek and additional open space. The committee would encourage the City to explore transfer of density credits to the remaining -developable property in exchange for the corridor protection and arranging an acceptable sale price. The City should also explore land dedication to the City in exchange for a tax right -off for the owner. This may also reduce the cash price to the City. To arrive at an estimate of the potential cost of the Schreier property to the City and the State Greenways Program, I had my staff use our GIS system to plot the required 50 foot buffer under the City ordinance, the proposed additional 100 foot buffer, and the additional land area along Maryland Avenue. This analysis is attached for your review. This information indicates that we are proposing to acquire 8.49 acres (approx. 370,000 sq/ ft/) in addition to the buffer requirements of the City. At approximately $50,000 per acre this would result in a cost of approximately $425,000. I would recommend that the City request the State to provide $225,000, and the City should commit to approximately $200,000. This would still allow the City to acquire the high value properties as identified on our priority list. 10 )arcel 44 N4.+-* f"N TTr-+', Wetland plus 50 foot buffer = 193,320.8 sq ft 4.44 acres s- Wetland Plus 150 Foot buffer = 502,994.6 sq ft 11.55 acres 150 foot Buffer minus wetland and 50 foot buffer = 309,673.8 sq ft @ $1.14 /sq ft = $353,028.13 7.11 acres @ $50,000 /acre= $355,457 Additional along Maryland 59,970.7 sq ft 1.38 acres 100 foot only plus Aditional along Maryland 369,644.5 sq ft @ $1.14 /sq ft = $421,395 8.49 acres @ $50,000 /acre = $424,294 11 Entire Site = 1,101,713 sq ft 25.3 acres mpie Subs and along the route her and enjoy r more of. your -izes as well as ce team photo to first -aid support lour bike, should way. or the 1999 MS i is $15 with a often disablifif �. Symptoms may limbs, or, severe, Most people with :s of 20� to 40 but ►tional effects can • •ity and specific on cannot yet be and treatment are disease. Sbri'y A MOPS 1s call 1-�+ 09- slte of N C A • . : r Min 777 -8800 : site urc ses. wi c - .w..r • P.1ewoo.*. Ma rem inin :- of o en sp ce doll rs 9 h�lss Sar /risks •determined by the Maplewood City any existing open space sites and list. Aichinger sent.a memo . to Assistant by Council .ir. the. of 1992, are therefore•are "in jeopardy, Aichinger City Manager Mike Ericson explaining The oal is to reserve a few natural "undevelo .lands or natural commented. the reasons for ranking the other g P areas in a city thick with new landscape feature.4 , -p th scenic, esthetic, Rather than try to acquire the enure properties third, fourth and fifth. Y developments. or copse' ation: value,: ,including Schreier property corridor, the The Schlumka property, estimated at P grasslands and wetlands, committee recommen 000, was ranked third for its In October of 1994, Maplewood woodlandsi. ded that the $95, - pa ssed a referendum to intended t6be, reserved in their natural council acquire a buffer along the creek location adjacent to an existing open residents pa ,;F, p reser v ed acquire open space properties for up to undeveloped.; state. The -council and the• remaining property on space site. q ' P P has ent .. $4.4 develo ed`54 criteria for rating . Maryland Avenue.. The Kayser property, estimated at $5 million. The city h p . p e , • , ; . , million acquiring 11 sites over the past conservatt , op After acquiring the. buffer; .1 .38 1 � $100,000, was • ranked fourth because it q g era space. They range intenance: acres of trian land would - does not connect . to any additional five years. There currently is $600 000 from local to ma of o -space money left for site The sit `e iewed were the Bradley be left along. Maryland Avenue. corridors. • ' s , Oaks site,:- oeated nteur According to the committee south of Larpe's memo, • The memo went on to say that the. acquisition ,� . t In charge of determining how the Avenue; the Schreier property. corridor, any development on this parcel would fifth- ranked Corbey site, estimate at g remaining funds are spent is the located e4t.bf Lakewood Drive; the visually intrude on the corridor and $130,000, would most likely be r g P ..�.., . Ma lewood Open' Space Committee, Corbey siie,loeated north of County may cause a negative environmental protected by current wetland er the Road C• and two sites in the southern impact during construction. g ' P ' P •'chin The re ulation. . cons ad isting of Cliff Ai g �,'..• r-- proposed to acquire 8.49 Ericson commented,in a telephone ministrator • of the ... Ramsey leg of p�ewood the Kayser 'committee . � r .�r " addition P P q • ' iew that he and Maplewood Parks Washington. Metro Watershed District; property9 8cated south - of Linwood acres, in to the buffer, at a cost in' p fan Grew -Ha' man a naturalist with• the . -Avenue, he site located of $50,000 per, acre or 000 The.` and Rec Director Bruce Anderson . y _ t�.� Map I Center; and" south of er.'. Avenue. The Bradley buffer would provide linear trail access recently met with Richard Schreier. Dominic Ramacier, a past m - '•`• Paul Priory open -space concerning, the purchase of hiS Domiember of Oaks site, r . imated at $130,000, and from the. St. original O en S ace Committee. the Sch,exet site, estimated at property to the Maplewood Nature .property. Ericson said Schreier seemed .. the P P first rankin b the Center. open to the city's suggestion, however, The committee recently recommended . $200,000,•d for g y the $600 000 be invested in five open committee; Th committee suggested the city he currently has a purchase agreement .. :. ace si•tes.The Maplewood City Aichin r ' in a telephone staff request a Metro Grecnway state with a developer leaving the ball in wed the recommendations interview,, vfihile all of the sites are grant of $225,000 and use city apes- the 'developer s court 'regarding the Council revie .: ... ' at the April 12 City Council e qually im` ant; the first two sites are • space funds to pick up the remaining.. ci of the s ty�s acquisition at the,land.': sites p y q meeting. different; ,the; others because of : $200,000. This would allow. the, city to:. g I ' ' n of open. space areas their loca They aren't adjacent to acquire other properties the priority The definition p p A pplic'an'ts sought for wor rce council ity . Workforce Council. iburban Ramsey County, is-additional volunteer Applicants are being sought for the Ramsey Potential volunteers should be residents of, or work. and be available for meetings every month as v assignments: The council has 23 members, selected from thl based organizations, education, economic develop! veterans and organized .labor. =The council provi development for job training aetivities in Ramsey For an application cal I ' Bobbie ' Crancer at 266 - are due April 30. For more information call Linda B' date sector, community- ,rehabilitation agencies, )'versight of and policy ,Completed applications it .770 -8900: ed tom'ore working.Aa i ies WIC now offer The Minnesota Department of Health announces that the income guidelines for the Minnesota WIC program have been revised. Up to 5,000 additional pregnant and breast feeding women and children up to age 5 may be eligible for the nutrition and food benefits. Eiigible individuals receive nutrition education, health care referrals and vouchers to purchase nutritious foods. The WIC foods are specifically chosen to contain nutrients often lacking in the diets of young children, and pregnant and breastfeeding women. To be eligible, you must be pregnant; breastfceding woman within 12 months of delivery; postpartum woman within six months of delivery or a child up to age 5; have an identified nutritional risk or have a family income of up to $20,461 for twc . people, up to $25,678 for three or up to $30,895 for four people. Rrir mntel nformation about WIC, call (800) 942 -4030. Attachment 7 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the director of community development proposed a change to the city's land use plan from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property located west of Highway 61 and north of County Road C. (PIN 04- 29 -22 -43 -0002) WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On August 2, 1999, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the plan amendment. 2. On August 23, 1999, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described change for the following reasons: 1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The purchase would help preserve a variety of natural features on and near this site, including slopes, wetlands and trees. 3. The property is a good economic value. 4. There is easy access to the area. 5. The site is next to an existing wetland and near Kohlman Lake thus expanding the open space corridor in the area. The city shall not make the land use plan change for the city -owned property until after the city closes on the property. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1999. 13 Attachment 8 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the director of community development proposed a change to the city's land use plan from M -1 (light manufacturing) to G (government). WHEREAS, this change applies to the park and ride lot located west of Highway 61 and south of County Road C. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On August-2,1999, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the plan amendment. 2. On August 23, 1999, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described change for the following reasons: 1. The site is public property owned by the State of Minnesota. 2. The State of Minnesota uses this site for a public park and ride lot. 3. There are no plans to develop the property for commercial or manufacturing uses. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 1999. 14 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA AUGUST 2, 1999 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. Land Use Plan Changes - Highway 61 and County Road C: Corbey Open Space (R -1 to OS) - and Park and Ride Lot (M -1 to G) Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. The land use designation for the 17.5 -acre Corbey property west of Highway 61, north of County Road C would be changed from R -1 (single dwelling) to OS (open space). The park and ride lot on the southwest corner of Highway 61 and County Road C would be changed from M -1 (light manufacturing) to G (government). Mike Ericson, assistant to the city manager, was present. Commissioner Frost had some questions about the lots to the west of the Corbey property. He also asked staff about the status of the other properties considered for open space that were ranked higher. Staff said negotiations with the owners of the higher- ranked properties have been ongoing but nothing has been finalized. Commissioner Thompson noted that there was a word processing error on both resolutions in the staff report where it says approve the plan amendment. - Staff said the errors would be corrected. _- -Commissioner - Thompson asked if we-- would_be- _disregarding the _committee recommendation if we were to proceed in the manner that is recommended. Mike Ericson, assistant to city manager, said the committee did rank five at the - top and, based upon approximate - - - -- - ------- - - - --- appraisals - of the properties,- there would be enough money in the current fund to purchase those five properties. Commissioner Thompson asked if the five properties were the only ones available for consideration at this time. Mr. Ericson said the five parcels of property that are recommended for purchase are the top five out of a number of properties that the Open Space Acquisition Committee looked at. He said the three priorities in purchasing property for the open space committee are: 1) you need to have a willing seller; 2) you need to have a willing buyer; and 3) you need to have an agreed upon price. Commissioner Rossbach asked if the city would be pursuing the grant from the state to help with the purchase of the one property which was laid out by the watershed committee. Mr. Ericson said that the city has secured a grant for $100,000 through the Metro Greenways DNR Program and that will be applied towards the Schreier property. Commissioner Pearson asked if there had been any movement on the Schreier property corridor and would that property be available through the Greenways grant. Mr. Ericson said that they have had discussions both directly and indirectly with the property owner and, in addition, have had an opportunity to work with the watershed district on ways to try to leverage the amount of monies that we may or may not have to use. Mr. Ericson said the property owner is not willing to sell at this time. Commissioner Rossbach questioned why the right -of -way lines, shown on the property line /zoning map in the report, look like so much is taken back from Highway 61 and County Road C. Ken Haider, city engineer, said there previously was a plan to have an interchange - type intersection at County Road C and Highway 61. Mn /DOT has decided not to build this type of interchange and so this intersection will stay as it currently is. Commissioner Rossbach Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 08 -02 -99 wondered, if this was not open space and someone wished to purchase the property, how the extra wide right -of -way off County Road C would affect access to the property. Mr. Haider said he hasn't researched this corner of the intersection but. Mn /DOT did purchase the access rights to some of the properties near this. He mentioned a corner property across the street that is not allowed any access to Highway 61 or County Road C because MN /DOT purchased the access from that property. It can only be accessed by combination with some other property and through that other property. Mr. Haider was not certain if these same conditions also applied to the subject property. Mr. Rossbach's concern was that, if access was not available, there was some type of wetland buffer -- restriction and a limited amount of high ground, the city might be taking $148,000 and "essentially throw it out the window." Ken Haider assumed that this situation was taken into account when the property was appraised. Mr. Ericson confirmed this and said, according to the land us plan, the appraisal showed one single- family dwelling. Other attempts at development have not progressed because of the cost of wetland mitigation, etc. Mr. Ericson said two appraisals were done on the property, these figures were added together and divided by two to determine this price. Mr. Rossbach questioned what impact, if this was developed residentially this property would have on the Greenway corridor. Mr. Ericson stated that the difference was one was a private use and the other public. Commissioner Trippler wondered if basically the city was spending $148,000 for the lower one quarter of this large parcel because the remainder is already classified open space. Ken Roberts agreed with Mr. Trippler's summary. Chairperson Fischer opened the public hearing for comment from the audience. Don Christianson, 1111 County Road C East, said that someone proposed a duplex a few years ago. He said the driveway would have to be placed in the last 100 feet of the west - end of this property. Therefore, the trees and a portion of the hill would need to be removed. Mr. Christianson said the price of the property also bothered him, but he would like to see the property preserved as it is. Pete Boulay, 1100 County Road C East, agreed with many of the comments made by _Mr. -Christianson. One of his concerns was that Mn /DOT might look for more parking space since the park and ride lot south of this site is already full. Mr. Boulay felt more open space was needed in this area to accommodate runoff. There were no further comments from the audience so the public hearing portion was closed. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which changes the land use plan for the undeveloped area west of Highway 61, north of County Road C. The change is from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). The city should make this change because: 1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The purchase would help preserve a variety of natural features on and near this site, - - -- including slopes, wetlands and trees. 3. The property is a good economic value. 4. There is easy access to the area. 5. The site is next to an existing wetland and near Kohlman Lake thus expanding the open space corridor in the area. Planning Commission Minutes of 08 -02 -99 The city shall not make the land use plan change for the city -owned property until after the city closes on the property. B. Adoption of the resolution which changes the land use plan for the park and ride lot on the southwest corner of Highway 61 and County Road C. This change is from M -1 (light manufacturing) to G (government). The city should make this change because: 1. The site is public property owned by the State of Minnesota. 2. The State of Minnesota uses this site for a public park and ride lot. 3. There are no plans to develop the property for commercial or manufacturing uses. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Commissioner Rossbach wondered if this site were zoned for government would a conditional use permit be need for the state to use this parcel. Staff confirmed that it basically did not matter what the parcel was designated, the state could use it. If the city purchased this as open space, the state would need to purchase it from the city. Chairperson Fischer noted that the motion included the deletion of the word not in the resolutions that applied to this request. Commissioner Pearson wanted to make a point that all the parcels purchased for open space are "not necessarily locked in to open space for perpetuity and forever." He said it takes a four - fifths vote of the city council to change the use. - Ayes all The motion passed. AGENDA ITEM.�� AGENDA REPORT Acti bl Council; Ind'orse�_ TO: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager Modified,, Re,��cte� FROM: Michael A. Ericson, Assistant to the City Mana date RE: Recommendation to purchase Bradley Oaks property for Open Space DATE: August 16, 1999 INTRODUCTION At its final meeting earlier this year the new Open Space Acquisition Committee approved and prioritized a list of five properties which it would like the city to purchase with the remaining funds from the Open Space Program. The Bradley Oaks property was ranked #2 and according to the new process for purchase, I proceeded with approval of the site selection from the city manager, Planning Commission, and Parks and Recreation Commission. After the Bradley Oaks property was approved I began negotiations with the property owner to purchase it. BACKGROUND The new Open Space Acquisition Committee was selected by the city manager last fall and city tY g approved by the city council to begin the process of selecting parcels of open ace land which „ p p would be purchased with the remaining funds from the Open Space Referendum. After a number of meetings the new committee selected a total of five parcels of land which met the criteria of the program and I proceeded with the acquisition process. I began negotiations with the Bradley Oaks property owner and together we explored a number g p of issues which were important to him first of which was his desire to kee p the parcel from developers and preserve it as Open Space Land and the last of which was a sale rice acceptable p p able to he, his wife and their partner. Many meetings were held over a number months and ultimately a reappraisal of the property was ordered since the original appraisal did not take into account the potential for lots via an out -lot off Montana Avenue. Discussions with the developer of the • . p Oak Ridge 4th Addition revealed that there was the potential for a five -lot cul -de -sac immediate off of Montana Avenue. The property owner finally agreed to accept the cit offer of $ 150,000 p ty for the 7.72 acre parcel of land which is immediately adjacent the Priory Open Space property. ry p p p perty. RECOMMENDATION The city council should approve the purchase of the Bradley Oaks 7.72 acre parcel of land at a price of $150,000 contingent on the standard criteria previously established by the city attorney. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken :Roberts, Associate Planner - SUB- J_E:CT: Land .Use Plan Change - Bradley aks Open Y p Space LOCATION. . East and south of Idaho Avenue, east of Sterling treet g , 9 DATE: August 3 199 g INTRODUCTION The city council directed the planning commission and arks and recreation commission p ommission to review the purchase of a property for open space. It is about a 7.5 -acre ro ert p p yeast and south Of Idaho Avenue, east of Sterling Street. (See the maps on pages 3 and 4.) City staff has negotiated a price of $150,000 for the 7.5 acres. State law requires that the planning commission advise the council whether proposed public acquisitions follow the comprehensive plan. Maplewood has not shown this site on the land use plan for open space. As such, we have scheduled a public hearing to consider changing the land use -plan for this area. The change would be from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). (See the existing and proposed land use plan maps on pages 5 and 6.) BACKGROUND Open Space Program On November 2, 1993, the voters approved the opens ace referendum. This to sell u t million p his vote authorized the city p o $5 million in general obligation bonds to buy land for open ace.__ The Open Space Committee recommended that the city ouncil consider buying vying open space from a list of nineteen sites. This list included the fourteen top -rated sites in Maplewood and five additional sites that the committee had rated first rst in their respective neighborhoods, but not city- ----wide. The city council authorized the staff to buy eight sites. These include Site 153A (Priory), Site 142 (Frost Avenue and English Street), Site 1 , Site 108 (Pearson), Site 116 (Spoon Lake), Site 116(a) (Kuslich), Site 168C (Grandview Addition) and Site 103C (County Road D and Woodlynn). Maplewood has closed on all these sites. On October 14, 1996, the council decided to buy the 6.5 -acre Re nier property Street for open space. g p pertY east of Arcade p p On November 12, 1996, the city council decided to buy ite 1686 (Stielow) Y on the northwest . corner of Carver Avenue and Sterling Street for about $146,000 for open ace. purchase there is about p After this t $600,000 left from the original $5 million to spend ace. ono en s p p On July 13, 1998, the city council adopted a policy for the urchase of add' ro ert . (See the oli p itional open space p p Y policy on page 7.) DISCUSSION Open Space The 1992 Open Space Committee did not rank this site. However, the 1998 Open Space Committee reviewed this site and several Others for the potential value for open ace. on page p p (See the memo from Cliff Aichinger starting p g 8.) They ranked this site first of the five the looked at advantages: this year. The committee found that this site has several adv Y • There are slopes, uplands, wetlands and trees on and near ' the site that would be protected • There is easy access to the area • The site could provide year -round recreational opportunities h pp es • There has been neighborhood borhood interest in preserving the site • This site would expand the opens ace corridor that • p the city has planned in this area • The site is near schools so it could be used for educational ur oses p p COMMITTEE ACTION 'On August 2, 1999, the planning commission recommended plan than e. approval of the proposed land use g RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on page 12. This resolution changes the land use plan for the undeveloped area east and south of Idaho Avenue, east of Sterling. Street. The change is from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). The city should make this change because: 1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open 2. The purchase p p p se would help preserve a variety of natural features on and near ' 3. There is easy access to the area. this site. 4. The site could provide year -round recreational opportunities. h pp es. 5. There has been neighborhood borhood interest in preserving the site. 6. The site would expand the open space corridor that the city has planned in this area. 7. The site is near schools so it could be used for educational purposes The city shall not make the land use plan change for the city-owned - • closes on the g ty owned property until after the city e property. p: sec24 -29 /open In 12. mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Existing Land Use Map 4. Proposed Land . Use Map-- 5. 7 -13 -98 Open Space Process Policy 6. 4 -5 -99 memo from Cliff Aichinger 7. Land Use Plan Change Resolution (R -1 to OS) 2 Attachment 1 i F101.LOWAY GMF COURSE RIPLEY AVE. KINGSTON AVE ; ! PRICE AVE. RI PLEY AV KINGSTON AVE r � � 1100MOfQ W L/RPE11T1 HOYf A,VE 00AI AVE 5 IpVq AVE 3 L Q NFEIBIRASKA y 3 p��s MI I Cr ldrfc � MGM a a U cot mom AVE 1 M1IELOPE WAY z AVE. � � 80190V LN � 4 5 0 OOIXiER LN HAWrtgME AVE E AVE. EROSE t; � G,4 IANGkOfJA AVE. QwwAm A PL J Q 1 X11. OR 2 REBWOk 3 PR ETREE O 4 80tChNIEW DR PW I RE:F OR a HVIEW OR 7 ROUND pus OR LOCATION MAP 3 4 N (N. St. P.) 1. tdARYJOE I.N. 2 TIERNEY AVE. 3. MEADOW OR. 4. RIPLEY AVE NORTH SAINT PAUL � AVE.. 2. KNOLL dR. 4. RI PLEY AV KINGSTON AVE r � � 1100MOfQ W L/RPE11T1 HOYf A,VE 00AI AVE 5 IpVq AVE 3 L Q NFEIBIRASKA y 3 p��s MI I Cr ldrfc � MGM a a U cot mom AVE 1 M1IELOPE WAY z AVE. � � 80190V LN � 4 5 0 OOIXiER LN HAWrtgME AVE E AVE. EROSE t; � G,4 IANGkOfJA AVE. QwwAm A PL J Q 1 X11. OR 2 REBWOk 3 PR ETREE O 4 80tChNIEW DR PW I RE:F OR a HVIEW OR 7 ROUND pus OR LOCATION MAP 3 4 N Attachment 2 LARPENTEUR AVENUE. 63-4-bi or ' 3 1 . 3 b • 914).022 1 97 6-7 39 33 i « N 9s SS 750 i 32 92' 264 . 0 ' 11) 2 0 3 ( (4-, 2600 ■ (37) 3 2.2 L 2580 9 8 1 7 6 5 3 4 Al 7 g : ! LJ'4!; I a: s _� �o 750' 11 -1-sS 133.141 N ( � \ •�% _ F-� 93.01 6 a of S7 X5 10 1(" 11 12 r0 1 13 4 15 17 ■ 'a 4.3 -4 7(0+3 50,L 11.5 to W) I %� CITY OPEN SPACE 4 3 z T� C4 W) N 7 w'!4 7 L N N 93 j r 48. 930'! 1 l E. IDAHO AVE. ■ 15 2 1615 co co qw� in! C4 to " i V) 4A Lf) co Lr) W) W) 74, N N C . 4 C4 W 14 1607 iA* 3 lz 7 5 3 2 1 ■ 4 4 ) 1600 <2 3 1593. 1601. 2 .• 12'� S, ---- CP 41J ') S) 1590 - s 2- 11587 - - - — - 71; 6 1580 12 13 1 CI O, !8 ■ 581 7 F,4 9 3 I T 7( F4 r?1. 47 uR 4 0 12 4 .0 ■ 0 . -jA 31 AIIJAM I - Ift r -.;— m y 0 y M op $3 FT EA.SE 6 Y 913 Is. A 91 AVE. 74AS --z JJ. 217.34 ' P-l� - 100. 113 q 11 bjEr 21 (43)2Z. (29 )4 O. L. A is .0 (42) • (25 a uAr (2�)l 4 W3 (21 or (27 C � MONTA N A 170 817. 9 sl If ��oti► , 149 V, j 201) 20 % 0 8 1 sk (41) • 2 (10) AV E. X. 0 ■ 4 19 P , Yk N 45 C %# 9 (19) 10 Z. 3 N , .4 (1 1 .0 11 (13 (17 (27) r7 dt q5- (2s) OAK A 7 6 CIRCLE 'N OO (29) (37 jib. 0 .ft W) 14 i 7 4) vb Sa to (34 3 Cl- WETLAND 633) ( 20% 11 &3; r 3 19 - ^. �(62) 6. . OUT LOT \ 21 O 4 to? (9 7 zz (7 1 (4) a a6 -� s i ■ 4 ..0, 14 0 too (70 06 2 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 3 major artenai w. %0 L R -1 W V v c Knight LAND USE MAP (EXISTING) 5 R -1 = Single - Family Residential R -3(M) = Residential Medium Density M -1 = Light Manufacturing i N Attachment 4 a � Gi NORTH SAINT PAUL North St. Paul Road I R-*9 I major arteriai R -1 — W R 0 cc E __ c Knight c; 00 Je c� - -- O vo = open space R -1 = Single- Family Residential R -3(M) = Residential Medium Density M -1 = Light Manufacturing LAND USE MAP (PROPOSED) IS 4 N Attachment 5 PROCESS FOR PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE PROPERTY 1. Council reviews potential open space parcel(s) to determine which warrant further consideration. 2. After consultation with Mayor /Council, City Manager appoints a committee made up of three members includin g one informed citizen, one City employee with experience dealing with land and/or environmental issues and one individual from an outside environmental agency/group with a similar background. The committee's role will be review all available information concerning the proposed property and provide the City Manager with a written evaluation further delineating value to the Open Space program. 3. City Manager will review and prepare a preliminary assessment and recommendation for each property for Council review and consideration. 4. Concurrently, the report will be given to the Park and Planning Commissions for their review and comment. A p ublic hearing will be held by the Planning Commission and public testimony taken by the Park Commission. 5. City Council will review the report and additional comments as provided and determine if the process should proceed to the next level. 6. City Manager will obtain an independent appraisal of the property and will confer with the Mayor and Council regarding acquisition strategy including _price and purchase agreement provisions. 7. City Manager will negotiate price and conditions with potential sellers and present Council with negotiated agreements. 8. After taking public testimony regarding the proposed property, Council may direct the City Manager to draft final closing papers and complete acquisition. Adopted: 7/13/98 Attachment 6 Ramsey - Washington Metro m District 0 0 e a d April 5, 1999 MEMO TO: Mike Erickson FROM: Cliff Aichinger C..'L SUBJECT: Open Space Committee Recommendations. 1902 _East Count} Road B Maplewood, PvtIN 55109 (651) 704 -2089 fax (651) 704 -2092 e -mail: rwmwd@mtn.org The Open Space Committee consisting of myself, Jan Grew- Hayman, and Dominic ___Ramacier, met on Friday, April 2, 1999. We met for two reasons; first, to visit and discuss the possible addition of the Schreier property on Maryland and McKnight Road, and second, to discuss our ranking recommendations for the parcels including the Scheier property. Our inspection of the Schreier property was very beneficial. For Jan and myself, it confirmed the value and importance of the site for greenway corridor connections to other open space areas in Maplewood. For Dominic, it was valuable to expose him to the site and give him a sense of it's potential value. After viewing the site and discussing it's potential value to the Maplewood Open Space system the committee members felt the Schreier site should be ranked as one of the top two sites to acquire. The potential of obtaining State Greenways Grant funding for this site allows Maplewood to consider acquiring the greenway even though it may be a higher cost than was considered for other open space sites. Based on this conclusion, the committee would recommend allocating the available funds as follows: Site Rank Site Name Estimated cost 1 Bradley Oaks $130,000 1 Schreier Property Corridor $200,000 3 Schlumka $95,000 4 Kays Pro ert $100,000 5 Corbey $130,000 Total 1 1 $655,000.00 The committee was unanimous in our ranking of the above properties. We were tied in our ranking of the top two sites. The Schlumka property was ranked third for its location adjacent to Ramsey County bluffland and Fish Creek open space. The committee felt the Schlumka property would be good to protect and keep from being developed into several 0 Memo to Mike Ericson 4/5/99 Page 2 residential lots. The Kayser property was ranked fourth. It is valuable due to its adjacency with the existing Maplewood Open Space, but does not connect to any additional corridors or open space. The Corbey site strongly considered and is desirable to keep from development. However, it was felt that the current wetland regulation will keep significant development off this site and acquisition may not needed. If development of-this site were more imminent, the committee favored acquiring the site. The committee feels that the Corby property could be dropped if the funds are required for one of the other sites (if the purchase price exceeds the estimated value). Schreier Site Analysis Rather than trying to acquire the entire site, the committee recommends that the City consider acquiring a buffer along the creek and the remnant property along Maryland. This acquisition plan provides the corridor connection and buffer protection and allows for reasonable development of the prime value portions of the property. We feel that this open space protection will add significant value to the remaining property and, if developed properly, could create high value residential sites adjacent to this corridor. The piece along Maryland would have little potential for development and could significantly infringe on the open space value of the protected corridor. After acquisition of the buffer there would only be 1.38 of land left along Maryland in a triangular shaped parcel. Any development on this parcel would visually intrude on the corridor and may cause environmental effects during construction. The committee felt this could be added to the acquisition and made into a trailhead or restored into a more valuable open space area. Although the Schreier site is not a willing seller, we feel it is a key site that warrants some effort on the part of the City to pursue. There appears to be some potential of working with the Planning staff to negotiate a development plan with the owner that would allow for a significant development on the site as well as protect the creek and additional open space. The committee would encourage the City to explore transfer of density credits to the remaining developable property in exchange for the corridor protection and arranging an acceptable sale price. The City should also explore land dedication to the City in exchange for a tax right -off for the owner. This may also reduce the cash price to the City. To arrive at an estimate of the potential cost of the Schreier property to the City and the State Greenways Program, I had my staff use our GIS system to plot the required 50 foot buffer under the City ordinance, the proposed additional 100 foot buffer, and the additional land area along Maryland Avenue. This analysis is attached for your review. This information indicates that we are proposing to acquire 8.49 acres (approx. 370,000 sq/ ft/) in addition to the buffer requirements of the City. At approximately $50,000 per acre this would result in a cost of approximately $425,000. I would recommend that the City request the State to provide $225,000, and the City should commit to approximately $200,000. This would still allow the City to acquire the high value properties as identified on our priority list. 9 )arcel , -C�I %" Wetland plus 50 foot buffer = 193,320.8 sq ft 4.44 acres (gejV;rV44.jj G ovAA+anC,& —a+o &Sf'"wV;H Wetland Plus 150 Foot buffer = 502,994.6 sq ft 11.55 acres 150 foot Buffer minus wetland and 50 foot buffer = 309,673.8 sq ft @ $1.14/sq ft = $353,028.13 7.11 acres @ $50,000 /acre= $355,457 Additional along Maryland 59,970.7 sq ft 1.38 acres 100 foot only plus Aditional along Maryland 369,644.5 sq ft @ $1.14/sq ft = $421,395 8.49 acres @ $50,000 /acre = $424,294 10 Entire Site = 1,101,713 sq ft 25.3 acres mpie Subs and along the route her and enjoy r more of. your -izes as well as ee team photo to first -aid support tour bike, should way. or the 1999 . MS I is $15 with a often disabling 1. Symptoms may limbs, or, severe, Most people with :s of 2G f 40 but )tional effects can • •ity and sp *cific on cannot* yet be 'and freafthent are disease. ;bdy34 the AIS 's call 14V09- 5fta at ' A 8- 7�88' =• r rn i ► w..+ .� »►..�I•"r.N'y+1•�"M'�""••',► ... M1•••.A•. . •`�. • '' •.•'1'�'�•'M"!!R•�'••► .•w.••►,►. f� t h N,►►q N• ers st e urc ses. w • number* of open sp ce doll rs rem inin • •determined - b the Maplewood City any existing open space sites and list. Aichinger sent a memo Assistant by Chrissy Sarinske Y . P • • Council .ir the fall of 1992, are therefore are "in ,jeopardy, Aichtnger City Manager Mike Ericson explaining The oal is to reserve a few natural "undevel�'ped .•,lands or natural. commented. the reasons for ranking the other g P areas in a city thick with new landscape features;;with scenic, esthetic, Rather than try to acquire the entire properties third, fourth and fifth. or conservation; value, ,including Schreier property corridor, the The Schlumka property, estimated • at d evelopments. October of 1994 Maplewood woodlands,'giassla' ids and wetlands, committee recommended that the $95,000, was ranked thud for its residents passed p assed a referendum to intended Obe preserved in their natural council acquire a buffer along the creek location adjacent to an existing open - ac uire o en space properties for up to undeveloped.;- state." The. council and the. remaining property on • space site. q P h as ent $4.4 developed '54 criteria for rating Maryland Avenue.. The' Kayser property, estimated at $5 million. The city h P. ' ' • ' ' s over the past conservati o •en =s ace. They range After acquiring the buffer; .1.38 ` $100,000, was ranked fourth because it million acqutr�ng 11 site p , P . P cu rrently is $600 000 from tocat to maintenance:•, acres of triangular shaped land would does not connect . to any additional five years. There cu y , . , .} ; . ewed were ::► of o en -s ace money left for site The sit �#evt the Bradley be left along' Maryland Avenue. corridors. �, . P Y The memo went on to say that the Oaks site,,.. ricated of Larpenteur According to the committee's memo, acquis �, . determini the Avenue; theSchreier property corridor, any development on this parcel would fifth - ranked Corbey site, estimated at In charge of g are sp ent is the located egi -Wt Lakewood Drive; the -visually intrude on the corridor and $] 30,000, would most likely be remaining funds p ,.,,. ,, . Space Committee Corbe sit :located north of County may cause a negative environmental protected by current wetland Maplewood Open Sp � Y e .,�.� , �• . ��� � The re• ulation consisting of Cliff Aichinger, the Road C and two in the impact during construction g the ...Ramsey- Ramse - le of lewood the Kayser committee proposed to acquire 8.49 Ericson commented,in a telephone % adm ..of _ Y g p .. I • • • • a eTShed District• ro ert -. . taied south of Lnwood acres, in addition to the buffer, ai a cost tntetv�ew that he and Maplewood Parks Washington . Metro. W t p P Yj , i ,.. • a naturalist with•the Avenue, the- &hlumka site, of $50,000 per, acre or $425,000: The.** and Rec Director Bruce Anderson Jan G•tew Hayman, to. �, ..�.. enter• and south of er.. Avenue. The Bradley buffer would provide linear trail access • : recently met with Richard Schreier. Mapl�ewood C .. . l •- ,. ember of Paul Priory open -space concerning. the purchase of his Dominic Ramacter, a past m'•' Oaks site tmated. at $130,000, and from the. St. 'e seemed the original en Space Committee. the property. Ericson said Schreier Schc let site, estimated at property to the Maplewood Nature . r iginal Op p ' ' � recen recommended . $200 000, { d for first ranking by the. Center. • open to the city's suggestion, however, The committee recen y The committer suggested th'c: city he currently has . a purchase agreement the $600,000 be invested in five open commi ttee� - y �, • n t . . e Maplewood City Aichin r4.• said in a telephone staff request a Metro Greenway state with a developer + leaving the ball i space sites.Th ; hili"'all • P ' y iew' of the sites are '• rant of $225,000 and use city open- , the developer s ec�urt 'regarding the Council reviewed the recommendations �ntervi .. 'grant ... . '1 12 City Council a wall inf � • 'ant `the'first two sites are , space funds to pick up the remaining.. city,s acqu�s�,tiun of the land:: of the sites at the April y q Y different.' '•the others because of : $200,000. This would allow, the, city to: meeting. • ' eir loca :'The 't adjacent to acquire other properties on the priority The definition of open, space are as ,. th _ y aren J Applicants sought for wor, Applicants are being sought for the Ramsey Potential volunteers should be residents of, or work and be available for meetings every month as assignments: The council has 23 members, selected from th based organizations, education; economic develop veterans and organized Iabot.:The • council prov development for job train raining activities in Ramsey For an application cal I' Bobbie • Crancer at 26 are due Ap ril 30- for more information call Linda f )rce counci at y . . Workforce Council. , . uburban Ramsey County, as. volunteer hate sector, community - t"- "rehabilitation' agencies, 'versight and policy I'C 6in'le(ed applications at 770 -8900: more 'working fa R ies . WIC now offered to . g The Minnesota Department of Health announces that the income guidelines for the Minnesota WIC program have been revisal. Up to 5,000 additional pregnant and breast feeding women and children up to age 5 may be eligible for the nutrition and food benefits. Eligible individuals receive nutrition education, health care referrals and vouchers to purchase nutritious foods. The WIC foods are specifically chosen to contain nutrients often lacking in the diets of young children, and pregnant and breastfeeding women. To be eligible, you must be pregnant; breastfeeding woman within 12 months of delivery; postpartum woman within six months of delivery or a child up to age 5; have an identified nutritional risk or have a family income of up to $20,461 for two People, up to $25,678 for 'three or' up to $30,895 for four people. , Attachment 7 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the director of community development proposed a change to the city's land use plan from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). - WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located east and south of Idaho Avenue and east of Sterling Street. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On August 2, 1999, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the plan amendment. 2. On August 23, 1999, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described change for the following reasons: 1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The purchase would help preserve a variety of natural features on. and near this site, --- _______ - ------ including - slopes, - uplands, - wetlands and trees. 3. There is easy access to the area. 4. The site could provide year -round recreational opportunities. 5. There has been neighborhood interest in preserving the site. 6. The site would expand the open space corridor that the city has planned in this area. 7. The site is near schools so it could be used for educational purposes The city shall not make the land use plan change for the city -owned property until after the city closes on the property. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1999. 12 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA AUGUST 2, 1999 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS C. Land Use Plan Change — Bradley Oaks Open Space Site (Idaho Avenue, East of Sterling Street) Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. He also answered a question from a commissioner about the location of the property. Chairperson Fischer opened the public hearing. Rob Gorke, 2554 Idaho Avenue, spoke for the purchase of this property. He noted the mature oak trees, wildlife, and hills on the site. Mr. Gorke said he was concerned about where any potential paths would be located. He hoped that they would not go along the borders of the property lines. John Haglund, the recent purchaser of a lot at 2518 Montana Avenue East, agreed that the lot was an excellent value. He asked that the city keep it open space but was agreeable to a path through the property. Anne Fosburgh, 2516 Idaho Avenue East, said she would like to see it left as open space. She felt that if paths were placed on the site, children would shoot the animals that are there with BB guns. Commissioner Thompson thought the site will undoubtedly be utilized and have trails. He said to "spend this amount of money and not use the site for educational purposes would be wasteful." Mike Ericson, assistant to the city manager, said there are no plans for trails in the open space but the potential is there. Mr. Roberts emphasized that the city was concentrating _on ___ - -- purchasing open space property. He felt that the "use of the property" and "how much development will occur" will be coming in the next few years now that the city has a part -time naturalist to oversee the open space. Ms. Fosburgh was concerned about being notified of any _plans for developing the open space. Ken Haider, city engineer, said there was no legal requirement to notify residents for some of the things that the city could do, but it has been "recent past practice to involve the community as much as possible and notify the community." ____He felt that, under the current city council, the neighbors would be notified and included. There was no additional comment from the audience so the public hearing portion was closed. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution which changes the land use plan for the undeveloped area east and south of Idaho Avenue, east of Sterling Street. The change is from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). The city should make this change because: 1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The purchase would help preserve a variety of natural features on and near this site. 3. There is easy access to the area. 4. The site could provide year -round recreational opportunities. 5. There has been neighborhood interest in preserving the site. 6. The site would expand the open space corridor that the city has planned in this area. 7. The site is near schools so it could be used for educational purposes The city shall not make the land use plan change for the city -owned property until after the city closes on the property. Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Planning Commission Minutes of 08 -02 -99 For clarification, Commissioner Thompson affirmed that the word not was removed from the resolution. -- _ Ayes all The motion passed. Agenda Item K3 MEMORANDUM_ TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HOME REPLACEMENT PROGRAM DATE: August 12, 1999 INTRODUCTION action by Council : Endor sed_,,.,, - 1 i o 1 4 f i e d Re jActed-....,...:,.,,,..� .,. Dat- The city manager has asked the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the city council to study possible future housing programs in Maplewood. The city is receiving tax increment revenues from the Carefree Cottages that the council has not committed to a specific use. Maplewood can issue bonds that would be repaid from the tax increment proceeds over- 25 years. The city could use the bond proceeds to finance housing programs. BACKGROUND On August 2, 1999, the city Council discussed possible - future housing programs with the HRA at the council /manager workshop. At this meeting, the council directed staff to prepare a housing plan that would replace dilapidated houses with new, higher -value replacement homes. On August 9, 1999, the council adopted a resolution that postponed the sale of the 1999 General Obligation Bonds .until September..27, 1999. The council took .this. action to._allow_.staff_to prepare the- necessary documentation to include the surplus tax increment revenues in the 1999 bond sale. This action will save the city money in bond issuance costs. DISCUSSION The HRA has been reviewing and considering housing programs for several years. For your information, I have included three memos for you to study. They include a June 1996 Housing Program prepared by Quam and Associates (starting on page 3), a memo from Mary Ippel of Briggs and Morgan about tax - increment financing (starting on page 18) and a memo from Bannigan and Kelly about tax forfeited -lands -(see page 22). City staff also has prepared a list of the houses in Maplewood that, in staff's opinion, are those that are in the poorest Condition and thus would be candidates for replacement. We have copies of this list if you wish one for your records. COMMISSION ACTION On July 21, 1999, the HRA discussed possible future housing programs for Maplewood. The HRA is interested in having the city start a housing replacement program and possibly working with the city to encourage development of the property on the west side of Van Dyke Street, north of County Road .B. RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to prepare a home replacement program that would: 1. Use the surplus tax increment proceeds (up to about $687,000) from Districts 1 -4, 1 -5 and 1 -6 to fund the housing program. The city must reasonably expect to spend this money within 3 years. 2. Buy vacant or dilapidated properties from willing sellers at fair market value. 3. Demolish any dilapidated houses and other structures and rough grade the lots. 4. Deed the vacant properties at no cost to an agency or group that will use the lots to provide new housing for low -to- moderate income persons. Such a transaction would be subject to all Maplewood zoning and building requirements. (Note: Because the city would be using tax - exempt bonds to fund this program, the city may only do no -cost grants of property. The city cannot sell the property or provide low interest loans with the tax - exempt money.) The council should also decide if they want to put any additional restrictions on the transfer of the lots including requiring staff approval of the design of new single - family homes or require a garage with each single dwelling. kr /p: misc \hsgpro. mem Attachments: 1. June 1996 QSA Study 2. October 28, 1997 memo from Mary Ippel 3. February 18, 1999 memo from Bannigan and Kelly 2 Attachment 1 Housing Program Concepts Evaluation City of Maplewood June, 1996 Qiiam, s t & Associates, 111C. 5 4 4 Maplewood Housing Program Concepts Evaluation Introduction The Maplewood City Council has requested that Quam, Sumnicht and Associates, Inc.. QSA) provide this housing program evaluation and report. Scope and Purpose QSA!s evaluation is to provide the City Council and the HRA with a summary of the following Maplewood program issues: 1. The type of programs (home replacement, existing home "transformation ", whole district redevelopment, etc.) that would be most effective in updating neighborhoods and conserving existing open lands, 2. The sources of funding that might be available to Maplewood (internal fund loans, private local lender participation, TIF financing, etc.) to initiate appropriate housing incentives, and 3. The cost effectiveness of the initiatives (For example, could loans to start a program be recovered, along with administrative costs ?) and the positive impact they might have on the taxes and revenues of the city and its school districts. 1 5 6 5 Background The aging of the 'Baby Boom" generation means a decline in the number of new families being formed, and hence a decline in the demand for starter homes, particularly those of the type built through the 1960's. First ring cities are threatened if housing becomes "market obsolete ". Left to its own consequences, a perception of spreading deterioration and diminished positive citizenship can lead to disinvestment. If this occurs, the scope and cost of programs to restore the neighborhoods becomes unmanageable. A Metropolitan Council study entitled, Housing Markets in 2000, suggests that the course of events in these communities may follow any of three trends: -If the current residents like the area they are living in well enough, they could decide to stay in their homes and remodel or add space to suit their needs. If this situation is widespread in the neighborhood, the condition-of the_homes and_ the desirability of the neighborhood could be greatly enhanced. - Owners could sell their homes at lower prices than they had hoped for, enabling individuals or families with low or moderate incomes to buy the houses. This situation, if widespread, could provide opportunities for home ownership to people -who rent- housing that- -may - be- inadequate-- for- - their needs because they cannot afford to buy the lowest - priced home on the market. - Owners could buy new homes and rent their current homes as either a short - term or long -term solution. If this occurs to many -houses in a particular area, neighborhoods that had been primarily owner - occupied housing could gradually become areas with a greater mix of owner occupied and rented housing. Poor maintenance of a number of homes in a given area could influence other homeowners to move from the area, perhaps resulting in additional rental housing. Housing Markets in 2000, pages 16,17 In communities that want to provide contemporary quality housing for growing families, there is a strong sentiment to assist in the accomplishment of the first of these scenarios. By encouraging quality home improvements, and even new home replacements, in existing areas of the community, the condition of the homes and the desirability of the neighborhoods will be significantly enhanced, rather than eroded, while at the same time, the risks incident to decaying or unstable neighborhoods can be avoided. 2 7 6 Framework for Evaluation The Metropolitan Livable Communities Act New recognition of the need for communities to take an active role in the maintenance and improvement of their housing, is evidenced by the recently enacted Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. The Urban Strategies Task Force states: The challenges cities face, such as deteriorating neighborhoods, crime and drugs, need the cooperative efforts of public, private and business interests to solve. Cities should take the lead in developing local and regional strategies that will assist them in dealing with growing neighborhood problems. Report on Urban Revitalization, 1994 Maplewood has elected to participate in this program. As a consequence, a set of recommended Housing Goals, Policies and Activities has been developed. The following facts are pertinent to these goals: 1. Metropolitan benchmarks state that at least 69 percent of ownership and 35 percent of rental housing in a community should be affordable. Because of the substantial portion of housing developed prior to the 1970's Maplewood exceeds these benchmarks. 2. At least percent of housing units - should be - other than single -family detached. Again, Maplewood is clearly in compliance and, given market trends and land availability issues, is likely to remain so without extraordinary city initiatives. 3. A city goal is to continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and price ranges. A further goal is to maintain or strengthen the character of existing neighborhoods by addressing the problem of deteriorating properties. One activity to achieve this goal, is HRA participation in programs to help property owners with home maintenance and improvements through loans and, if available, grants. Comprehensive Plan Legislation. Legislation governing the adoption and updating of comprehensive land use plans, calls for the updating of Maplewood's comprehensive plan by the end of 1998. Existing Government Pro ams. A variety of programs exists to assist various housing needs, at the Federal, State, Regional, and County level. While too numerous to outline within this report, (see appendix) QSA has considered their existence and purpose, and has selected relevant programs for discussion in the context of its evaluation of current Maplewood needs. 3 Program Goals At the inception of this evaluation, with input from Maplewood staff, the following goals were developed, against which to evaluate recommended programs: • Keep the Maplewood housing market viable and values increasing by constantly improving and upgrading housing, and *Eliminate problem housing, incident costly services and enforcement by removing housing which can only deteriorate because its basic quality is inherently low. QSA Observations - Underlying Maplewood Characteristics After physically reviewing the community, and evaluating information about Maplewood, QSA observes the following community characteristics: *Maplewood is characterized by a discontinuity of identity both as to geographic shape and boundaries, and as to bonding social structures (such as school and postal districts). established Maplewood neighborhoods mix properties of disparate quality, esthetics and value, to an extent that might confuse investment and a clear sense of development potential. *Despite these observations, a better than average 82 percent of its residents (according to its 1995 survey) regard Maplewood's sense of community as excellent or good. Additional Program Goal Based upon these observations, QSA has adopted an additional Program Goal: *Create a sense of unified action in a housing program that is seen to confer a benefit on the whole community and each of its residents. The basis for this addition is two -fold. First, local government should do enough in any housing program so that the effort creates an ongoing faith in the community's commitment to better its housing. Otherwise, spot efforts or minimal assistance may result only in temporary or isolated results. A larger, broadly understood city commitment to ongoing improvement has the benefit of catalyzing additional private action throughout neighborhoods, based on its residents' faith that their investments will yield a positive return. Second, Maplewood is unique. While its physical appearance and configuration militate against a strong sense of community, nevertheless, one exists. It is critical to tap this asset, to overcome what is otherwise a difficult program goal —that of achieving housing activity that is symbolic to, and representative of the whole community. 9 4 8 0 Evaluation of Program Types and Funding Sources. QSA has selected the following four types of Housing Activity for evaluation. Remodellin a� nd Repair. Typically aimed at low to moderate income households, this activity is essential to any healthy community. As virtually every city does, the city of Maplewood, through its HRA, already participates or plans to participate in this type of Housing program through Metropolitan Council HRA and MHFA assistance. Implementing this type of assistance requires targeting and informing appropriate homeowners and, in some cases, as in the case of Ramsey County CDBG and HOME programs, applying to appropriate administering agencies. Maplewood staff and the HRA are well- qualified to pursue and administer this desirable type of ongoing assistance, which typically does not require a major municipal revenue source. Home Replacement. This activity addresses the most basic redevelopment problem faced by fully developed neighborhoods. Since some of the housing in older Maplewood neighborhoods was built before zoning and building restrictions were in place, properties exist that are deteriorated and inconsistent in character from the rest of the neighborhood. There is no more effective single action that can be taken in a small residential neighborhood, than to remove existing eyesore property, replacing the worst home, with a new home that sets anew area quality standard. QSA recommends that a program for this activity be developed and - presented to the HRA -and City Council for approval. While some private and government programs exist for this purpose, such as Habitat for Humanity, or CDBG grants, typically these are limited to low income replacement housing. Since Maplewood is in no present danger of falling below Metropolitan Council benchmarks for this type of housing, it would be beneficial to explore municipal funding, utilizing scattered site Tax Increment, for somewhat higher value home replacement. An example recommendation is described below. 10 Ddstinz Home "Transformation ". The term "Transformation" is used to define a major reconstruction of an existing home that, rather than simple remodeling, converts it to a market competitive home that offers the amenities found in a new home. QSA's experience indicates that the market will not bear the cost of this type of reconstruction, without city loans or grants. In addition, banks are hesitant to lend on this type of loan, first because the "transformed" home may not appraise out at a price high enough to justify the loan, and second, because the process (which first tears apart the collateral, before improving it) seems risky to an uninvolved lender. In another community, QSA has successfully helped develop a home "Transformation" loan program through a major lender. QSA suggests that this type of program be deferred until a successful home replacement program is in place in Maplewood. After that, the improving climate in older neighborhoods will provide a greater inducement to residents who live there, to make a major investment in their existing homes, and it will be easier to get Transformation homes appraised at higher values. Funding for this type of activity would typically come from a revolving loan fund, from the city. District Redevelopment. In communities where major deterioration has occurred, whole district redevelopment is sometimes advisable. Funding is typically from Tax Increment Financing, with possible Livable Communities Act funding, or Federal low income assistance for some portion. QSA does not recommend this approach in. Maplewood. Except where it might be appropriate to convert residential fringe areas to commercial, there are no major areas in Maplewood that have reached the stage of deterioration that would suggest this costly and wholesale approach. Other. Some types of housing development, such as New Subdivision Development, or Multiple- Family Unit development are not evaluated here. The character of Maplewood limits the areas in which new subdivisions can be created, and the market generally drives such development without unique city programs or subsidy. The creation of new multi - family housing typically occurs by traditional means of development or redevelopment, and is typically market driven. Evaluation of special Niche Housing, for example, executive attached homes, senior housing or cluster housing typically requires separate market studies, and usually occurs at the initiative of a developer. P ei 10 11 Physical Improvement. Recommendation. QSA recommends that Maplewood initiate a program for new home replacement. The program might begin with as few as one or two homes, if the concept is properly presented. An ongoing target of additional homes should follow. The program should start by tearing out old eyesores and replacing them with new, higher value homes. The prospect of developing a second program to encourage residents to "Transform" their existing homes should remain a possibility. At present, the mix of housing in Maplewood does not create an imminent demand for larger homes that would impel residents to transform existing housing into market competitive larger homes. But, after eyesore homes have been improved in given neighborhoods, this will encourage private citizen improvement of housing, including, as a natural consequence, some home transformations, if the city is willing at that time to help encourage it. For the present, fix the worst first. Procedural Recommendation QSA recommends that the City Council enlist and appoint residents from each planning district of the community to serve as an advisory housing task force for the following action to: •Identify an initial target area for housing improvement that would a. Symbolize the whole community to most residents, and b. Send a signal that Maplewood's residential areas will not be permitted to decline, •Identify that area's most critical housing improvement need *Select and recommend a prototype project (or projects) to sponsor a. Using the Program Types and Funding Sources outlined below b. Working closely with city staff and council /HRA liaison, Help support and broadly publicize the prototype project, and *Expand into broader program activity, in more geographic areas. 7 11 12 Rationale Based upon the need to begin with isolated homes, in individual neighborhoods, it is important to create a sense of broader community involvement. A task force of representatives from distant neighborhoods would tap into the sense of community from which Maplewood benefits, (and address the fact that residents feel a stronger tie to their own neighborhoods than to the community as a whole.) The planning and publicity effort will then be truly community wide. While first prototypes will not be constructed in every neighborhood, the input of residents from other neighborhoods can help identify the areas of concern that represent, to all areas, a threat of community decline. In addition, the selection of a separate group of respected community citizens (rather than solely members of the Planning Commission, the HRA, or the Council), will communicate to the community, the city's intent to take a serious new initiative specifically tailored to assure the improvement of Maplewood housing. It will also permit the task force members to devote their meeting time exclusively to this goal. (It might also serve a second purpose, in providing valuable community evaluation for the 1998 revision of the Housing portion of the Comprehensive Plan.) The cost of this procedural recommendation would primarily be city staff time, with some possible outside consultation. The source of funding could be made a part of the - general budget. 8 12 13 Typical Example While the specific decisions about new prototypes should be developed by the task force, this hypothetical example illustrates what might be pursued. An area of Maplewood that represents "typical" older Maplewood might be selected by the task force for its first prototype. An area near English Street south of Frost might signify an area where there is concern that the effects of aging nearby St. Paul housing might spread into Maplewood. A consideration in selecting the area might include the desire to maximize the potential for new home development along the abandoned rail lire. The advantage that new homes already exist along Frisbie Avenue might help other nearby residents to get higher appraisal values when improving their homes in the future. Funding for the project could be from a general fund loan, repaid by tax increment. (Typically school districts recover more from the funding they receive when new children move into the new home, than they forego in new tax increment.) An older home appraised at $60,000 could be acquired by voluntary purchase, and razed. The lot, then worth $25,000 could be sold to a private builder under an agreement prescribing design and value requirements. Anew $145,000 -home might then be built on the site. Over approximately twenty years, the _tax increment it would generate would pay off the lot write -down, (from $60,000 to $25,000) along with reasonable site clearance and administrative costs. (See example on Appendix B). Conclusion Over the next decade a general fund loan of $200,000 to $300,000 could potent ally produce new homes in all thirteen planning districts of Maplewood. Revolving use of the funds would produce a permanent commitment likely to spur confidence among Maplewood's residential homeowners. After a few years, when word of the program spreads, a second program to help homeowners '"Transform" their own homes would be appropriate, creating a rich selection of older, well -kept homes, thoroughly "transformed" market competitive homes, and design - integrated new homes. The result of active planning and commitment will eventually spur many times the city's investment in owner initiated upgrades and improvements, even in areas where no public money has been provided. The result will be seen in spin -off benefits both in new tax base revenues and in citizen confidence in Maplewood. 9 13 14 Appendix A Program Types -Tools for Physical Development *Public -City Sponsored CDBG (low income) HOME Program (low to moderate) T'IF (Removal and replacement) Transformation (grant /loan) MFHA construction (low income credits) Joint Venture -City acquires /Private rebuilds Home Transformation CDBG (low income) &HOME Program with e.g. Habitat Pilot Projects •Public /Private -City Encouraged CDBG (low income) &HOME Program with e.g. Habitat acquiring MFHA (low income) deferred loan and fix up programs Publicity and Support Seminars to spur private remodeling /rebuilding Advisory services to the public • Private - Market Driven CRA Creative Lending Programs Zoning Changes Funding Sources • CDBG -Low income 50% of median income - Second - mortgage, 5 years - 50% back, 10 years could be a forgiven grant - Federal money involves relocation costs if property is acquired •HOME program- -Grant to acquire property (Davis /Bacon act to govern) -Can be housing grant for .city created rental housing (backlog) •City resources . -Loan from the general fund for TIF scattered site redevelopment - General budget allocation to fund citizen task force involvement -Revenues -from Charitable Gambling *Livable Communities grants - Demonstration projects - Community driven projects • MFHA - Mortgage and home ownership assistance loans -Low income and new housing tax credits -Great Minnesota Fix -up Fund - Mortgage Revenue Bonds and Credit Certificates cates 14 15 Maplewood Appendix B New Home Illustratio $60,000 Acquisition Price: $60,000 $600 Site Clearance $3,000 Administration $1,000 White Bear 1.38592 Total Cost $64,000 $832 $872 Lot Resale ($25,000) 0.0002711 0.0002711 Net Cost to Recover M N�� $39,400 $16 $865 Tax Increment Revenue: $838 New Home Value $145,000 1% of $72,000 $720 ° 2% over $72,000 $1,460 Tax Cap. Value $2,180 No. St. Paul Roseville White Bear School Dist. Rate 1.38592 1.45316 1.36949 Tax Cap. tax $3,021 $3,168 $2,985 0.000552 0.0002711 0.0002711 Mkt. Value tax $80 $ 3 9 $39 Total Tax $3,101 $3,207 $3,025 Tax Increment $2,237 $2,319 $2,187 20 Year recovery $44,733 $46,381 $43,737 Dilapidated Home $60,000 $600 $600 No. St. Paul Roseville White Bear 1.38592 1.45316 1.36949 $832 $872 $822 0.000552 0.0002711 0.0002711 $33 $16 $16 $865 $888 $838 Addendum (Modified Recommendations) Background On July 9,1996, QSA presented the foregoing Evaluation to the Maplewood HRA. This addendum is provided to address responses communicated by the HRA and city .staff. Variation of QSA Procedural Recommendation The HRA and city staff express concern about the creation of a separate task force to identify the Program's initial target area and that area's most critical housing improvement need, and to help support, publicize and expand the program activity. Members of the HRA express interest in conducting these activities themselves, as the HRA, without the creation of an additional task force. QSA response: While the task force recommended by QSA is not intended to become a permanent new citizen body, (It's life would be limited to the completion of defined tasks set forth in the recommendation), most of the same ends could be achieved by designating the HRA as the task force, (possibly supplemented with members from the Council, the Planning Commission or others, necessary to provide city -wide representation). This approach has the advantage of harnessing the expressed enthusiasm of the HRA. If this approach is -used, QSA recommends that the HRA (acting as the task force) consider holding at least one broadly publicized community input meeting to present the concept of the program to interested citizens and to take their recommendations regarding the issues that the task force is to decide. This would help retain the broad publicity and the message of community inclusiveness contemplated in QSA's task force recommendation. 16 17 Accelerated Emphasis on Home- Transformations The HRA expresses an interest in accelerating the development of a Home Transformation program for Maplewood. QSA response: It is QSA's experience that a Home Transformation program is difficult to use as a first program to inspire belief in improving home values._._The_difficulty exists in persuading lenders and the public that a Transformed Home can attain a resale value that justifies it's expense. In areas where there are improving values, first driven by a program that replaces older homes on an infill basis, the way is paved for gaining higher assessed values through home reconstruction as well. However, given the enthusiasm the HRA expresses for this program, the HRA could be directed to begin designing a Home Transformation program immediately. QSA believes that as soon as a new home replacement program is demonstrated at least once, there should be at least a few locations where existing home owners could be induced to begin home transformations. One program approach might be to begin mixing in the construction of Transformation Home prototypes, soon after one or two replacement homes are completed. 17 ff"001 Attachment 2 FA 9 4200 FIRST NA7fONRL BANK 3LTILd1NG 332 MINNESOTA STREET SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 551[71 17i )R:EGGS A1V'D MORGANT TELEPH0T3$ f612► 223 -6600 FACSIMILE (612) 223 -6450 FROFESSfO1VAL ASSOCIATION wRI7ETt'3 DIRECT DIAL (612) 223 -6620 October 28, 1997 friar oma TEA's�E -iMM L i �r1 s.co PP m VM FAX )Dan Faust Finance Director Maplewood city jail 1830 East co=ty Road 13 Maplewood, MN $5 109 Ile: City of Ma l ewood, Minnesota - Tax Increment Financing � - xng I�lstrict Nos. �. 4, 1-5 and 1 - Tear Ilan: On May 24, 1993, the city of Maplewood established Housing District Nos. 1 -4 an 1 - 5 and on March 21, f 995 established Hosing District No. 1 -6, These three tax incremen t financing districts are qualified as housing districts and are subject to the followin g. requxrenzents of th Tax Increment Financing Act relat ;n to housing districts: I. _ revenue d __ ewed - - fro a tax increment financing--district - -district qualified as a housing R - � q rig district must he used solely to finance the cost of housing rojects as defined in Section P n 469. 74, subdivision 1I, which provides as follows: "Housing dl "cf means a type of tax increment financin g district which consists of a project, or a portion of a project, intended for occupancy, in part, b persons or yP famiies of 1 w and moderate income, as defined in chapter 46 .p 2 Title II of the National Ho sincy Act of 1934 the National Housing ct of X959 the United St g ' Sta HousTg Act of x.93?, a s amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended an other similar present or f attire federal, state, or municip legislation, - or the regulations promulgated under an of those acts, A p roject ect P .1 does not qu lify under this sabdivi'sion if the fair market value of the improveznen s which are constructed for commercial uses or for uses other than lo w and mo erate income hoasjng consists of more than 20 p ercent of the total fair market value of the planned improvements in the development plan or agreement. The fair market value of the improvements may he determined using the cost of c nstruction, capitalized income or other ap , method of estimating rket value. M1NNMpOLCS OFFICE . IDS CENTER • Ww5y,6K)CGS.COM 1 $ ME+EER — LEX MUNDI, A CiA$At, nSSOCIATIpN OF INDEPENDENT Lwv/ FIRMS Z d Z 8 NVOE0000 IBS 110E � BAXGGS AND MORGAX Dan Faust October 28, 1997 Page 2 � The cost of ublic smprovernents directly related to the housing projects and the allocated ad inzstrative expenses of the City may be included in the cost of the housing project. 4 i 2. For residential rental property, the proper mtis i c e ' . , p P tY must fy the nom requixaments for a qualified residential rental project as defined in Section 142(d) of the .Internal Revenue Code. (This means that 20% of the units must be occup b persons and fames whose income does not exceed 500 of the median faniil 40% of y Income or 4 �' the units must be occupied by persons and families whose income does'not exceed 6d of the median family income). A property also satisfies the Tequirements of Section 142(d) if 50% of the residential units in the project are ccupied by individuals whose income is 800 or Jess of area median gross incom . The requjrements of I and 2 apply for the duration of the tax increment f' ancing district and apply to residential property receiving assistance financed wit tax inc rements, including interest reduction, land transfers at less than the Q 's cost of acquisition, utility service or connections, roads or other subsidies. , 3. An amount qual to at least 80% of the revenue derived from tax increments aid b p y propertie in the tax increment financing district must be expended on activities in the tax iu rem e nt financing district or to p bonds to th extent that the proceeds of he bonds were used to finance activities in the tax increment financing dis ict. Ire the case of a housing district, a housing project as defined in 469.174, Sub ivlsion 11, is an activity in the district, (This th at notwithstand ng the 80% rule the tax increments can be spent on actf�dties outside of the tax in rement financing district so long as the tax increments are spent on a "housing pro ect ). 4. Revenues derived from tax increments are cons idered to have been expended on a n activity within the tax increment financing distnct only if one of the followin g o MUM � a. befor or within five years after certification of the district, the revenues are a � ually paid to a third arty with respect to the actni P� b. bonds' the proceeds of which must be used to finance t e 'v' � l`' h a c zty, are �./ issue and sold to a third party before or within fire years after certification of they tax increment financing district, the revenue$ are spent to rep the P bonds, and the proceeds of the bonds either are on the date issuance, ssuance, reaso ably expected to be spent before the end of the later of (i) the five - 19 E d L669690996 ION/V I @l'1S Al 01 86 16Z'b0(QHM) VV9EOiYRSqDIHe NiC9Z of BRIGGS "D X03RO Dan Faust Octobar 28, 1997 Page 3 1 year penod, or (ii) a reasonable temporary period Aithin the rneanlna of the ' e of that terra under_ section 148(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Co de, or are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement frond• G. binding c ontract s with a third party are entered unto for p erformance of the acts � before or within five years after certification of the tax incrernent finan lag district and the revenues are spent under the contractual oblia Lion; or d. costs � 't . with respect to the activity are paid before or vi thin five years after certilication of the tax increment financing district and the re are spent, to reimburse a party for paym of the costs including interest on unreim bursed...costs. 5 . B.eaimmn with the sixth year follo�ng certification of the district0% of the revenues de ived from tax increments paid by properties in the housing district that remain after the expenditures permitted "under 4 above must be used 'j, y . t o pay (i) outstanding bong, as described in 4, (ii) contracts as described in 4 and (iii) when t outstanding bonds haye been defeased and when sufficient in has been se , €side to pay contractual obhuations as described in 4 above ? the tax increment fi ancing district must be decertified and the pledge of tax increment discharged. - -- -- -- On e Decemb r 9� � 3 we requested the certification of the or1 g inal net tax • - - - - - -- ___ capacity of - ax Increment Financing Districts Nag, 1 -4 azd 1 -5 and on lea 23, we � Y r q ested certification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -6. W e have- n ot received the certification from - the County the al alway slow but I assume that district Nos. 1 -4 and 1 -5 wer certified by the Coup sometime in 1994. 1 County haiancing also not received the certification from the for Tax Increment District No. 1 -6. I assume that district No. 1 -6 , was certified in 1995. 'Yo should chec the Certifications that Y assume you received from the Co unty and s t n etermine the actual dates that they were certified. The City has within five y ars of the certification elate of these districts to comply with the rules set forth in shave. If the -City has not entered into contracts, incurred costs or issued bonds starting with the sixth year, following certification of these districts the City will only be able to use the tax increments to pair the outstandin Developmen Agreements with the Carefree Cottage of Map lewood Lim.1ted p Partnerships. For purposes of filling out the forms for the State Auditor and determining budget amounts far tax increment - g a nt districts Nos. � 4, 1-5 and 1-6, You will want to review the aforementioned. rules. You may find that the City will 3 20 b d L669690996 'ON/71 0l 'LS /91 01 86 1 6Z TO (GHM VVDNOYRK5,1D188 Pi08IU1 Dan Faust October 28 1997 r Page 4 not be able o incur other costs Within the fire period and therefore you may want to reduce t budgets for these districts. If you have any qu tions, please do not liesitate to give me a call. Very truly yours, Mary Ippe MLI:tfy- ! f 21 Attachment 3 MEMO TO: Mike McGuire Melinda Coleman FROM: Juli Stensland Bannigan & Kelly, P.A. RE: Tax Forfeited Lands - Use Deeds DATE: February 18, 1999 I. Use Deeds The City of Maplewood has acquired property through use deeds that may be utilized for a public purpose such as open space or drainage. A question has been raised whether moderate income housing can be developed on property that was conveyed by a use deed. II. Three Options to Acquire Tax Forfeited Lands The three ways that the City of Maplewood can acquire tax forfeited lands are as follows: use deeds, a public auction or by purchasing the property at its appraised value for a public purpose. Because the property may be designated for residential housing, a use deed does not work for this situation. If a public auction was conducted, then anyone, including a developer, could bid on the property as well as the City. However, the City can preempt the auction and other bids if the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority purchases the property at its appraised value. If the City wants to exercise a certain amount of control over the purchase of the property, the best option is to purchase the property at the appraised value. The City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority must purchase the property, rather than the City itself. If the City purchases land using public funds, the acquisition must be fora ublic u p purpose. _Acc_ordingly, the City could convey the property to a private party only if the public use was no longer necessary. If the sole purpose of the City's acquiring the property is to convey it to a private party, a public purpose does not exist. Attorney General Opinion, 425 -C -11 (May 27, 1964); see also Attorney General Opinion 430 (Nov. 23, 1948) (attached). Therefore, the question referenced above has serious implications for the City because if a governmental subdivision to which tax forfeited land has been conveyed for a specified public use fails to put the land to that use or abandons that use, the land reverts back to the state of Minnesota. Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, subd. 1 d, le. In addition, Ramsey County views any non - public use as suspect and I have been informed that the County will be taking a different position if the use is not specifically for the public. However, the property would not revert back to the state of Minnesota if the sale or other conveyance of tax forfeited lands is by a housing and redevelopment authority, an economic development 22 authority r a city as authorized by chapter 469. One of the purposes of a housing and redevelopment Y Y authority is to "remedy the shortage of housing for low and moderate income residents, and to redevelop blighted areas, in situations in which private enterprise would not act without government participation or subsidies." Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001. A certificate made by a housing and redevelopment a � g authority stating that "the conveyance has been made as authorized by chapter 469 may be filed with the • count recorder or re istrar of titles, and the rights of reverter in favor of the state ... will then terminate. �� Y g Minnesota Statutes Section 282.01, subd. ld. Therefore, if the property is to be used in accordance with the Housin g p and Redevelopment Authorities Act, the property would not revert back to the state of Minnesota. Chapter 469 also addresses targeted neighborhood revitalization programs. In order for this proj ect to be a targeted neighborhood revitalization program, there are various eligibility requirements pertaining to cities of the second class, such as Maplewood. For example, one criteria for the program -is that a city f the second class be designated as an economically depressed area by the United States Department of o gn C ommerce. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.201, subd. 2. If the City of Maplewood would like to explore this option, further research would be required. III. The Appraisal The appraisal would be conducted b Kristine Kujala, Supervisor of Tax Forfeited Land at the Department Property artment of Pro ert Records and Revenue at Ramsey County. Patrick Kelly and I met with Ms. KJ � property u ala. Ms. Ku' ala stated that the ro erty in question is approximately 3 Y2 acres. She also stated that the rice of the property would be the appraised value and is not subject to negotiation. However, our p p p Y meeting � very tin with Ms. Ku' ala was ve informative and we believe that we will be able to work with her if the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority decides to purchase the property. IV. The Approval After Ms. pp KuJ ala appraises the land, a reconveyance application for each parcel would need to be submitted to the Tax Forfeited Land division. The application should include a statement of facts as to the use to be made of the ro ert and the need for such property. The next step is for the Ramsey County p p Y Board and the State to approve the conveyance. However, Ms. Kuj ala did not emphasize the final Bo pp Y approval g val rocess in our meeting and, therefore, I do not foresee this process hindering the acquisition of the property. Once the pp acquisition is approved, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority can exercise its q discretion property cretion in selling the to a private developer in accordance with chapter 469. Because of the in process, Y may involved the Cit want to make inquiries regarding the developer before proceeding. Y it would be advisable not to et too closely However, g Y involved with any particular developer because of public perception. 23 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JULY 21 1999 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Possible Future Housing Programs Melinda Coleman, director of community development, told the commissioners that the city council would like them to attend a Monday, August 2, 1999, workshop. The meeting begins at 6 p.m. The council would like to talk about some housing issues. She said there is a surplus of tax - increment money, primarily from the Carefree Cottages, that needs to be spent on housing projects. Mary Ippel of Briggs and Morgan, the city's bond consultant on TIF projects, will be at the meeting. Ms. Ippel will review many of the items contained in a memorandum that was included in the HRA packet. Ms. Coleman asked the commission to review the QSA study that was done for the City of Maplewood in June 1996. She said one of the primary recommendations of this study was to do a home replacement where the city would buy a deteriorated house, tear it down, and then sell the lot for development to create a revolving loan fund to continue this program. Chairperson Fischer mentioned that the HRA's priority, as discussed at a previous meeting, was to renovate "borderline" housing by means of low -cost loans, etc. Ms. Coleman said that Steve Quam of QSA, who did the housing program evaluation for Maplewood, recommended that the city start with the home replacement program and then possibly get into remodeling or repair. It was Ms. Coleman's recollection that the HRA was not fully in agreement with Mr. Quam's procedural recommendation to set up ad hoc committees composed of representatives from all over the city. Ms. Fischer thought another criticism. was- Mr. - Quam _- had_no- t- considered the areas designated in the comprehensive plan as sites that needed to be watched because they were older, marginal housing or next to subsidized housing. Ms. Coleman suggested the commission consider housing project options that they would want to recommend to the city council. Ms. Coleman also wanted to discuss the tax - forfeited parcels located across County Road B from city hall on the west side of VanDyke Street. She said there is some interest in combining these parcels with the parcel on the corner to do a townhouse project. The HRA's involvement is necessary for the city to sell and buy land. A public purpose, such as affordable housing, is also a requirement. The city would let the county know that they are interested in selling these parcels, pay the market price to Ramsey County, and then enter into an agreement with a developer to the affordable townhouse project. Ken-Roberts, associate planner, asked if TIF money could be used to buy this land. Ms. Coleman thought it could but wondered if the council would want it all spent on this project. She felt a better approach would be to market the land and request maximum density development. Mr. Roberts also wondered, if the proposed housing was low- moderate, would the TIF money be used to subsidize the rent or pay for infrastructure. Ms. Coleman urged the commissioners to be prepared to ask this type of question at the August 2 meeting. Commissioner Pearson suggested designating specific types of remodeling projects that H RA -2- Minutes of 07 -21 -99 would be available at low interest, subsidized rates to get certain properties rehabilitated and to try to get the blight corrected in affected areas. Mr. Roberts liked the idea of "getting rid of three, four or five really problem homes." City staff has compiled a list of ten "bad" homes. Mr. Roberts also asked it the city should wait until one of these homes is put on the market or if the owner should be approached before that time. Various options were discussed. Ms. Coleman felt that Maplewood was very fortunate in that they do not have a lot of blighted housing. She thought most of the council members wanted to stay ahead of the problem. Ms. Coleman emphasized that if this money is not used it will be lost so the council should come to a consensus on how it should be spent. She suggested that the commission summarize to the city council what program they would have as their priority. The consensus was the first priority would be to replace substandard housing. Ms. Fischer emphasized that "it isn't as though we are intentionally starting off to demolish affordable or our only low -cost housing in the city." Those houses being considered would have definitely deteriorated to a point where it was no longer feasible for improvement. The HRA was also interested in a town house project on VanDyke Street, if possible. AGENDA NO. — Action by Cecil: lnd;orcoQ�, AGENDA REPORT uodiff•d.,...,,.,...., ROJeatea Date TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Preliminary Approval of 1999 Tax Increment Bonds DATE: August 13, 1999 It is proposed that the City Council (A) adopt the attached resolution authorizing tax increment Housing District #1 -4 and #1 -5 reimbursements for sanitary sewer improvements to finance debt service on the 1999 Tax Increment Bonds, (13) adopt the attached resolution authorizing the use of excess tax increment revenues from Housing District #1 -6 to finance debt service on the 1999 Tax Increment Bonds, and (C) adopt the attached resolution which provides preliminary approval for the sale of $719,094 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds. The tax increment bonds proposed to be issued will finance the Home Replacement Program outlined in the agenda report prepared by the Community Development Department. The attached 12 -page report prepared by Springsted Inc. provides additional information on the tax increment bonds. The debt service on the 1999 Tax Increment Bonds will be financed by tax increment revenue from Housing District #1 -4, #1 -5, and #1 -6. These three districts were created for the Carefree Cottages Phase I, II and III projects, respectively. The development agreement for the Carefree Cottages Phase I and II provide that the developer be reimbursed for land acquisition and site improvements from tax increment revenues. The agreement provides that the developer be reimbursed with the first 14.5 years of tax increments, the City will receive the next 10 years of tax increments, and the developer will receive the final half year of tax increments. The tax increments designated for the City are for reimbursement of sanitary sewer improvements directly related to the Carefree Cottages Phase I and II. These improvements were initially financed by the Sanitary Sewer Fund. The improvements involved slip lining a sanitary sewer main to decrease leakage into it and increase its capacity. Decreasing the leakage has caused a decrease in the flow through the sanitary sewer main and a corresponding decrease in sewage treatment costs. This will result in an approximate ten -year payback of the improvement costs by decreased treatment costs according to the City's engineering staff. Therefore, there is no need for the Sanitary Sewer Fund to keep the tax increment reimbursement of sanitary sewer improvement costs related to the Carefree Cottages Phase I and II. These tax increments can be used for the Home Replacement Program. The development agreement for the Carefree Cottages Phase III provides that the developer be reimbursed for land acquisition and site improvements from tax increment revenues. The agreement provides that the developer be reimbursed with 90% of the tax increments for the first 15 years. This leaves tax increments available for other uses (10% of the tax increments for the first 15 years and 100% of the tax increments for the following 10 years). These tax increments can be used for the Home Replacement Program. It is recommended that the City Council (A) adopt the attached resolution authorizing tax increment Housing District #1 -4 and #1 -5 reimbursements for sanitary sewer improvements to finance debt service on the 1999 Tax Increment Bonds, (B) adopt the attached resolution authorizing the use of excess tax increment revenues from Housing District #1 -6 to finance debt service on the 1999 Tax Increment Bonds, and (C) adopt the attached resolution which provides preliminary approval for the sale of $719,094 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds. PAR NANCE \WP\AGN \99BONDS3.WPD Resolution Authorizing Tax Increment Housing District #1 -4 and #1 -5 Reimbursements for Sanitary Sewer Improvements to Finance Debt Service on the 1999 Tax Increment Bonds WHEREAS, the development agreement for the Carefree Cottages Phase I and II provide that the developer be reimbursed for land acquisition and site improvements from tax increment revenues from Housing District #1 -4 and #1 -5. The agreement provides that the developer be reimbursed with the first 14.5 years of tax increments, the City will receive the next 10 years of tax increments, and the developer will receive the final half year of tax increments. The tax increments designated for the City are for reimbursement of sanitary sewer improvements directly related to the Carefree Cottages Phase I and II. These improvements were initially financed by the Sanitary Sewer Fund. The improvements involved slip lining a sanitary sewer main to decrease leakage into it and increase its capacity. Decreasing the leakage has caused a decrease in the flow through the sanitary sewer main and a corresponding decrease in sewage treatment costs. This will result in an approximate ten -year payback of the improvement costs by decreased treatment costs according to the City's engineering staff. Therefore, there is no need for the Sanitary Sewer Fund to keep the tax increment reimbursement of sanitary sewer improvement costs related to the Carefree Cottages Phase I and II. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the tax increments from Housing District #1 -4 and #1 -5 designated for reimbursement of sanitary sewer improvements are hereby re- designated for the Home Replacement Program. Resolution Authorizin the Use of Excess Tax Increment Revenues from Housin District #1-6 to Finance Debt Service on the 1999 Tax Increment Bonds WHEREAS, the development a for the Carefree Cotta Phase III provides that the developer be reimbursed for land ac and site improvements from tax increment revenues from Housin District #1 -6. The a provides that the developer be reimbursed with 90% of the tax increments for the first 15 y ears. This leaves tax increments available for other uses (10% of the tax increments for the first 15 y ears and 100% of the tax increments for the followin 10. y ears). NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the tax increments from Housin District #1 -6 are hereb desi for the Home Replacement Program. • .r I EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE C ITY COMC I L OP THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MELD: August 23, 1999 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey Count , Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on the 23rd day of �iugust , 1 9 99 ,r at o' c�.ock ,�,. M . far the ur ose in art of authorizing the competitive negotiated sale of p p art the $719, Gene obligat Ta Increment Bonds, Series 19 9 9B (Capital Appreciation Bonds) of said City. The f ollowing members were present and the following were absent; Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption RESOLU'T`ION PROVIDING FOR THE ' COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATED SALE OF $ 719 , 0 9 4 GENERAL oBLIGATioN TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 19 9 9B ( CAPITAL APPRECIATION BONDS A. WHEREM , the City Council of the City of Maple Minnesota (the "C * ty") , has heretofore determined that Maple r it is ne cessary and expedient to issue its $719, General. y t Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 19 9 98 Ca. p ital pp A►. reciat ion Bonds) ( the "Bonds") to f inance a scattered s ite housing project within Development District No. i of the City and B. WHERpAS, the City has retained Springst.ed Incorp orated, in saint Paul, Minnesota ("Springs ted") ; as its independent advisor' and is therefore author�.2ed to sell es obligations b a, competitive negotiated sale in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.E these g Y p su bdivision 2 (9); and , IJQWr THEREFORE # BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood Minnesota ae follows I. AUthori&ation, The Cit Council hereb authorizes Sprin to solic't bias for the com the Bonds, . jt1 - %ra na Ocale ©f 2. Meetin Bid ..Qpeni This Cit Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Terms of Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A for the pu:rpose of considerin sealed bids for, and awardin the sale of, the Bonds. The Clerk or her desi shall open bids at the time and place specitfied in such Terms of Proposal. Tex-ms of P .021p-osal. The terms anal ,condo. tions of the fonds and the ne thereof are fully set forth in the "Terms of Proposal" attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereb approved and made a part hereof, 4. 2fficial.Statem In connection with said competitive negotiated sale, the Clerk and other officers or emplo of the Cit are hereb authorized to cooperate with Sprin and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds, and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the fore resolution* was dul seconded b member and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote bein taken thereon, the followin voted in favor thereof, and the followin voted a the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared dul passed and adopted. STATE OF MINNESOTA COXMTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersi being the dul q ualified and actin Clerk Of th e Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HERIEDY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and fore extract of minutes with the ori thereof on f ile in m of f ice and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes Of a meeting of the cit Council of said city, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the cit $719,094 General obli Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1999 ( capital Appreciation Bonds) . w.TTNEss my hand this 23rd da of Augusti 1999* 1076252.1 SO od 9s: 8 66 g � 6n Clerk 3 0SV9-5ZZ -Z19: XPj NUMOW "8 S99Idg EXHIBIT A i-Hve TY t IAS A"Gruzao cPPjv�LL R CORPOON D -TO � NEGOTUk� , *c0t4 To jarr pp_, F-C CIVP-1T14E FOLLOWINO : TERMS OF PROPOSAL -$719VOW C;rrY OF ~LEWOOD, MINNMOTA GENFJ.r.RAL 0SUGA110N TAX INCREMENT SONDS, SFR'F 1999B ( CAPITAL APPRECIATION BONDS) (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) Pro a s for the Bonds will be received on Monday, So ternber 27, 1999, unlit 10:00 APM. -.0 Central Time, 'at thG OffiGOO of SpOn incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint paul ivintmota, after which firne the will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds Will be b the City Co►ndt at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same da At 4t SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS p ro p osa l s r na y be subrated in a sealed envelope or by lax (651) 223-3002 to Spdn Med to 4 nn o stea pdor to the Vi proposals vdthoutfinal pace or coupons, ma be subaf bme of sale. Th4-0 bidder shall be msponsible for sUbl to S prin g s%d the final I V P rIce and coupons. bY telePhone X651 223,-3000 or fax (651) 223-3002 for inclusion in the ifity.of the bidder to Mach Submitted PrOPOS31- � Spyin , Will assume, no, flabird for the Inabi Spdng:sttd pdor t:i the bone of sale spedfied atbave. All bidders are acWised that GaCh PrOP0981 shall be deemed to constitute a contract bstftGn the Widder and the cit to purchase the Bonds re of the manner of the Proposal submitted. DETAILS OF 114E BONDS The Bunds will b* dated and shall bear Interest front jh0Ir d a t e of settlement, lintarest on the as Febmary I and Bonds shall be (ximpounded an Aug 8 2000p and serwiannually thereafter on Au i of each o ar. and will be payable, together vAth PrInCi al., only maturity or upon prior redemption, Thy "oti principal as used herein is that prinCiPal amOunt W hich, Aen ac4mted at its associated Interest We untl fis sCheduled 1 da te, resulls in a pa described heralrafter. as Its "matilrity value. jhe:5cj MatUjity valves Will be In $6,000 denafffinadons or integral multiples thereof. The Bonds are bein issued in the a ori ptindpal amount of appro S719 ,094,, The rates spedfied b itte sur-ce I puri6hasar will determine the at"i pdnaai 6p an=nt of each tiond. The ffatuft valU08 win be Paid ©n Februar I in the amounts and Wars 6 a8folla"I 2013 $380,000 2017 W%000 2021 $1 3000 201 Si 5000 2= $105,000 2.0`14 2015 5160,4109 2023 $105 000 2019 * 2016 $160,000 2020 $150*000 d i ncrease or re duce the 2013 t1l aftr bids a r e opened and prior tO awur jo nc T ence the , . h cit tes 10 In (nigpleq of V , % i1of) in ,order t msuft In an odgfnel pjfnrotpa1,0mQ11f,d ©t thro 2023 -q .v a ppswmatel y 1719.. A 90 od 9s: 8 66 S En OSV9-2Zz-ZT9:XPJ NUMOW '8 S99M9 Irchasor,5h2l, Drovide table of a=ew values for 4v ht%Lxen of aw4 kmi g lha,.Muc 'ASful P, r:t;P-.hemry I j ina Au I ThfOugh fim vy lu Rif val ue of each MeMMY 4`1 " spedfled for suit �nnd�, a smoo Matuifty- t the olntSreSt W18 ncy Jhe C7 =Writy date WWI on semian co a O f discrepa fro the 06*uMad ;Wd"U"."t aata of oeftmer 27. 19994 in =� c glcularion Of a. led values C= shall be Contr01103. BOOK ENTRY SYSTr.M t p distribution of ans of a book entrY s With no The Bonds will be ISSued by me ist f issu In M r09 gr ed orin and one BO ndo 130 nds made to the pub1c;. The Bonds will be ISM in C pdncipsi am ount of the Bonds rnatuting aCh y ear, Will be re pmsentng the L96f8gatO ^ $a Of ille Depository Trust mpa NDTCA , rag in the na me of Cede & co. as nomin Individual purchmeS Culities depositorY of th ® Bonds. New york NOW yClrks wtfjob will act as se f $ 5,000 or an mul5ple thereo of a aingle of the y ma be made if % the prindpal amount o and records of CFTC and Its. P3rfi(JPSir1tS- he books [)TC OT its 10MInm M r e g istered owner Mt 1ity through hook entdos made an t 11 be the int ymen to parficip T ants of DT C va Principal 'd interest Oft PAYW8 by " MOStr2r to an erest Pa 0S . Mrks�r of pdndpal and gn 'at ownefs b the 80n of CeTC; tMns for of pTindpal and interest pa W. W C1 responSibiribr of such '11 be partiC and other no rgfinaes of benelidal ants Will bta. the rc*p0r1s1b1r1tY r6qUir6(j to deposit the paluelp urciiaser. a s a sand of delivery of the Sonds. wi owners- The p SondS wM DTC- REGISTRAR - rho city will name the re which shall besubjea 10 applicable SEC reg ulefions- the OW W ill pay for the serb4c4 ► o f the "Istmr. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION - Bqnd * ffil nal be suU to PeWnsnt in advance of them r"P80"'e starred maturity dates. SEGURITY AND PURPOSE , 6ij , pledge Bon will be g ene Ml obfigations of the M fo r which Me city , ft l ull faith and The Bon n , L in ;jC jf $ Mon the CRY wilt PlOd9e aadtt and i s t o levy d7tred g eneral ad valore V istricis Nos. 1-4,1-6 and 1-5- ;*-we mvenVed WOM the C Tax Iricremon, avaWle tax irlcnOofflent scattered afte housing PrOlOct,% Me . p YAM be used for a j WF. OF PROPOSALS Specified rnatufi and a purchase Pficc I n4 le s s the n 93.30% shalt alnnuai *ntere�t to for each PMP gS a pQfMrkta which purchase plim shalt be for the Bonds, W -. qrq* wd 40ts&j olig of the g p lind p al amoun'L $7 N pgr j in the form Of 3 COfffied p shall k!,P- a=mPW1ed by a Good Falth DOPOSit 1% ya p i q to the order of a 5uvty Bond in the smoUnt Of '910 pa , Chec or a FinanCW rinanCial Su E�Ond I$ or a a t p If a In t o State of ed� is us , ed I t must any The p p riMnS to j SUCh 2b an Insurance comPanY V~ aubmtood to SPr1n9!Qt9-d used i t must be from he rjV S uch bond Must be 0 .2 , L rdel Minnesotal and pp � a pp MV Cd b The Financial s uret y Bond MUSL Ir the - of the proposatsv If tins too are opening a Incorporawd P lior 0 such Pin SUtStY B0n0- �teed by q MIMM rod to ciach underWiMet WhQsP- I)Wst 's 9=2 Bond, then that PU KNOW is requi ePNIftr Using aj F itianaaal surew fiftA I of - wire S check or awarded to an u nd to ff n a -a -114--r- C p Deposit to rpo springsted Incotated in 0 lat er than 3:3 Ps M ntMj MMOO g n the (fit M Spring8je d not 11 ft sub i nstmAed by d jnC0T pc>rste 0'sit j$ . n o t r e d b that -,Tnlsw transfer 8s a, If s uch IDOP - • - nt lu CfW next bUs cial surety Bond m a y to drawn y Cav JdJ6 �*In g the award' Ifisf the De pOS71t feqUirGM0 Firmwn t the C to si a% It a 2-0 Od 9s: 8 666 2T En 0SV9-2zZ-ZT9: XPJ NUMOW "8 S99M9 VAn gepuzU th Q h v 2k of t6m p u rbhzear. the amount of which will be de ducWd at seftftflt and no tn %rest WIN acc rue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser ralks tO cOmply with The t+ed cleat; said amount w111 be retained by the City. , No proposal can be vy0drawn or amp r� r�is unt & the mo oti n g of the C scheduled for ar���tad afl�ar th�� �;m® set fiat reaeivina p p +A►S �$ � s award of the Bond is adjoumed, mcessed, or continued to another date without Marc of the 130nds having been made. Rate be tes shall in inti multiple$ of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rages ogra must bo to level or ascending order. Bonds of the sa m atu shall bear a s in g le mte from the date of tip Sonde to the date of matutnty. No conditional proposals will be accepted AWARD The. Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the last interest rate to be determined oft a trice intemst 00 st ( TIC) basis evaluated as of October 273 1999. The Gay" s =nputadon of the interest rate of eat:01h proposot, In accordance with customaq pradce will be controllinO. The City will reserve the right to' {l) waive non- substantive it� frot•mati#iea of any proposal or of matters relating b: the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, u) reject all proposals without cdu . an Ml, viii) reject any proposal which the City detet�msne$ to haves failed to c mp�ly with the terms he rt.2:1 ►. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASEWS OPTIO N If the Sonds qualify for isauenoe of any policy of mun icipat bottd Insurance or commit raont thereftr at the op tion of the underwri the purchase of any SuCh insurance► policy or the n snd e xp e nse of the purChasec Of issuance of any s ��oh c shaft be at the sole cotta � the Sonds. Any fncreasW costs of issuance of the Bond$ resulting from -such purchase of Y +C' re and rec0mi ed a trsursnce shaft be Paid by the pun��ser, except that., If the �y his q uestod m in on the Ban Is from a rating agency, the CAY wilt pey th�ct rating free. Any other rating 9 agency fees shall be the respons cbility of the purchaser. Fat u re '1 of the rnu pliel a bond i nsurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awardfad to the P purchaser sna(I n..A constitute cause , fob' failure or refusal by the purchaser to ecoeRt deliv+�ty do the Bonds. CUSIP NUMBERS Bonds q fy g . 1f the So uali for assig of GUSIP UMbOrS such numbeFs will be printed on the Bonds, lout neither the ta(lure to pant su ch numbe on any Bond nor any Terror with respect R ne the purchaser to acmpt deUvery of the thereto will tao l .tuts ca for failure or refusal by rifiic Mon numbers Bonds. The GU$1p Sap&a Bureau charge for the essignmont Of Cuslp ide shalt be paid by the purchaser_ On or about Oci&er 271 199% the Bonds will be delivered without Cost to " puMhoser ttuough D C T in td ew York. Mew York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Bd gg � s and Morgan, Professional Assodation, of saint pact and n caecbjfit�te. Minneap Mln;tesota and of customary MSin9 Paws, including a na�tt; 9 anon Bo nds shall to node i fed0ral, of 800419n� funds On the deter G� settlement, payment for this Sa _ iwooll �-& ived at the offroes of the City or its designee not Eater than I Zoo s which shall be r ice r ands shah have been 'C Mq. �:ae t as compliance vVdh the term of Payment for the B + en t f p ents a purchaser shall be [tables fio the +City for mrade Impos$tbtel by acdon of the City. or its ag p ns for suffer : b the City by mason of the put Meer nO n- cornpi�2�ncx* vth said tern u r any loss y ��,�,�,► ®rig. . 80 ' d 2-S: 8 66, 2 Z End 0SV9-- 2ZZ-Z Z 9 : XPJ NU9d0W '8 S99I dg %C% CC NTINUIN DISCLOSURE 610 G On ft date of the RcWal issuance and deliver of the ends, *10 CRY YAII e xecute and delver a Continuin Di6duawre UndellaKln wherounder the Cq will covenant to provide, or cause to bye provided, annual fi-ma racial llnf;omiati-on, Includin audited financial StStements Of the Cit and notices Of ceftin F1118teft WON$. as sPected Irl and re b SEC Rule 1&:2,42(b)(5 ). OFFICIAL STATEMENT UO Cit 1184 O U11ha ft ed the pr of an Offical Statement contdi 110:Pq nin pertinent i bon relarivc. to th Sonda, and said Official Statement will -sur o as a near! final Official Statement within the meanin of Rule 15c2 -i2 of the SeouriNes and Exchan Commission,, For copies of the Official StstsmGnt or. for additional information pnor to sale,, an prospective Purchaser is referred to the Finandal Advisor to the Cit Spdn incorporated,* 85 Es t Seventh Placa Suite 1 $a Paul, Minnesota 55101 , telephone (651) =403000. The Official Statenjent, when further SUpplemented • b an addendum or addenda Specif the Maturit dates, principal amounb and interest rates of the Bonds, ether VAth an other infcmM66n MqUim 4 b lipw,, shW1 constitum 2 '*Final Official Staternenir of the Cit wit[, re to the Bonds, &s that term '16S defined i ed n Rule I 5c2-12, B y wardIng the Bonds to an undsrMtor or unterwiftin s y ndicata submitUn a proposal therefor, the Cit a that, no more than seven b w4ness da after the date cif such rd , It shall provide mfithout cost to the senior mangi u ndarwrftr of the s to which the Bonds are awarded 60 copies of the 01111CIal Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The Cit desi the senior mana underWftr of the s to which the Bonds are awarded as Re a for purposes of distftitin copies of the Rnal Official Statement to each Pardeipatin Underwdter. An undermfter clallverin a proposal with respell to the Bonds a thereb that If its; proposal is - Pte4d by the C (1) It shall 00cept such desi and (H) It shall enter that, a 4A ity contmctual relationship with all Participatin Underweitara of the Bonds for purposes of the rt"Ipt by eadj SUCh Participafin Underwifter of the Pinal Official StiatemenL, assurtnq Diated Au 23, 1999 BY`-ORDER OF THE CI TY COUNCIL W Ka► GulfiYi(e Cit Clerk IVIZ"DMAM i M v - 60 "d 2-S: 8 66( . 2 T En OSV9-2zz-ZT9:XPJ NU%1014 '8 S99Idg Recommendations For City of Maplewood, Minnesota $719,094 General Obligation T Bonds, .Series 1999B (Capital Appreciation Bonds) Presented to: Mayor George Rossbach Members, City Council Mr. Michael McGuire, City Manager Mr. Dan Faust, Finance Director City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797 SPRINGSTED Public Finance Advisors Study No.: M1408 F;;,0000 SPRINGSTED Incorporated August 12, 1999 RECOMMENDATIONS Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of: $719,094 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 19998 (Capital Appreciation Bonds) (the "Series 19998 Bonds ") The Series 1999B Bonds will be issued in conjunction with the City's $940,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999A (the Series 1999A Bonds "), which the Council authorized at its meeting on July 26. The original sale of the Series 1999A Bonds was postponed during the Council meeting on August 9 so that both the Series 1999A Bonds and Series 19998 Bonds could be sold on the same date in order to save on costs of issuance. We recommend the following for the Series 1999B Bonds: 1. Action Requested To establish the date and time of receiving bids and establish the terms and conditions of the offering. 2. Sale Date and Time Monday, September 27, 1999 at 10:00 A. M. with award by the City Council at 7:00 P.M. on the same day. 3. Authority for the Bond Issue Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 469 and 475. 4. Original Principal Amount of Offering $719,094. Included in the attached Terms of Proposal is a provision that allows the City to adjust the maturity values based on the final bond yields received in order to result in an original principal amount of approximately $719,094. 5. I 7. Repayment Term The Bonds will mature annually February 1, 2013 through 2023. Because this issue is a capital appreciation bond, no semiannual interest payments will be made. The City will only make annual payments which constitute principal and accreted interest beginning in 2013. Source of Payment While the City will make its general obligation pledge toward the repayment of the Bonds, excess tax increment revenues from tax increment districts #1 -4, #1 -5 and #1 -6 are expected to pay the debt service on the Series 1999B Bonds when due. Prepayment Provisions After discussion with City staff, it was decided that the Series 19996 Bonds would not be subject to prepayment prior to their stated maturity. Adding a call feature to this issue would increase the yield required by investors resulting in less project funds available to the City. City of Maplewood, Minnesota August 12, 1999 8. Credit Rating Comments The City's general obligation debt is currently rated "Aa2" by Moody's Investors Service. An application, for a credit rating will be made for this issue along with the Series 1999A Bonds. 9. Federal Treasury Regulations Concerning Tax- Exempt Obligations (a) Bank Qualification Under Federal Tax Law, financial institutions cannot deduct from income for federal income tax purposes, income expense that is allocable to carrying and acquiring tax - exempt bonds. There is an exemption to this for "bank qualified" bonds, which can be so designated if the issuer -does not issue more than $10 million of tax exempt debt in a calendar year. Issues that are bank qualified receive slightly lower interest rates than issues that are not bank qualified. Since the City does not expect to issue more than $10 million in 1999, the Bonds are designated as bank qualified. (b) Rebate Requirements All tax - exempt issues are subject to the federal arbitrage and rebate requirements, which require all excess earnings created by the financing to be .rebated to the U.S. Treasury. The requirements generally cover two categories: bond proceeds and debt service funds. However, since the City expects to issue less than $5,000,000 in 1999, the City qualifies as a small issuer and will be exempt from rebating excess earnings on Bond proceeds to the federal government. (c) Bona Fide Debt Service Fund The City must maintain a bona fide debt service fund for the Bonds or be subject to yield restriction or pay back excess investment earnings in the debt service fund to the federal government. A bona fide debt service fund is a fund for which there is an equal matching of revenue to debt service expense. Since the City will not begin making debt service payments on the Series 1999B Bonds until February 1, 2013, any tax increment revenues collected and pledged toward the repayment of this issue will need to be invested at a yield less than the yield on the Series 1999B Bonds. (d) Economic Life The average life of the Series 1999B Bonds cannot exceed 120% of the economic life of the projects to be financed. The economic life of land purchases is 30 years. The average maturity of this issue is 17.35 years and is, therefore, within the economic life requirements. Page 2 City of Maplewood, Minnesota August 12, 1999 10. Continuing Disclosure This issue is subject to the Securities. Exchange Commission's continuing disclosure requirements. Previously, we recommended the City exempt itself from the continuing disclosure requirement since the Series 1999A Bonds were less than $1 million. By adding the Series 1999B Bonds, the City no longer qualifies for the exemption and will need to commit to full disclosure for both the Series 1999A and Series 1999B Bonds. 11. Attachments Projection of TI F Revenues • Debt Service Schedules Official Terms of Proposal DISCUSSION Proceeds of the Series 19996 Bonds will be used for a scattered site housing project whereby the City will acquire blighted property, which will then be developed and ultimately used for low to moderate income housing. The Series 1999B Bonds will be repaid with tax increment revenues to be received by the City from tax increment districts #1 -4, #1 -5, and #1 -6. Page 5 shows the projection of the tax increment revenue. The projections of tax increment revenues to be received by the City are based on the terms provided in the respective developers agreement for each tax increment district. We understand the City will receive only 50% of the tax increment revenues from T1 #1 -4 and #1 -5 in 2009 and 2020 but will receive 100% of the increment revenues during 2010 through 2019. Prior to 2009, the City will not receive any revenue from either district. For TI F #1 -6, we understand the developers agreement allows the City to retain 10% of the increment revenues through 2012, then collect 100% through 2022. For projection purposes, we have used the 1999 increment revenues for each district provided by City staff. We have kept these figures constant throughout the term of this issue and have not used any inflationary assumptions for the incremental value nor in the tax rate. The figures on page 5, column 10 assume that the City will collect and invest the annual tax increment revenues received in 1999 through 2012 at 5% until February 1, 2013, the first maturity of the Series 1999B Bonds. The Series 19996 Bonds are being sold as Capital Appreciation Bonds (CABs). CABs are typically used when the revenues to repay the debt will not be received until some point in the future or when an entity is trying to specify an exact payment amount. CABs are similar to a zero coupon bond or a Series EE savings bond -they are issued at a deep discount to their stated maturity value based on current market yields and bear no interest coupons. The bonds accrete value as they approach their maturity date. Since there is no stated interest, the City will not make semiannual interest payments. Page 3 City of Maplewood, Minnesota August 12, 1999 Page 7 shows the estimated pricing of the CABs. Note that based on the implied yield and term, each maturity is sold at a deep discount to its stated maturity value. The $1,770,000 figure represents the total debt service to be paid by the City. The $719,094 figure represents the expected current value of the Bonds. From this figure, the costs of issuance and allowance for discount bidding are subtracted providing the City with approximately $687,000 for project costs. Finally, page 8 compares the total revenues generated on page 5 with the maturity values, showing annual excess increment revenues of approximately $4000. Respectfully submitted, 00 SPRINGS D Incorporated Iir Page 4 City of Maplewood, Minnesota Projection of Tax Increment Revenues TIF Districts #1 4 & #1-6 Increment Revenues ColiecW in (1) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Used to Pay Debt Servive on 2/1 (2) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 TIF 01.4 Revenues Total Amt. to City (3) ( 107,270 21,020 25,760 - 25,760 - 25,760 - 25,760 - 25,760 - 25,760 - 25,760 - 25,760 - 25,760 - 25,760 - 25,760 12,880 25,760 25 25 25,760 25,760 25,760 25,760 25,760 25,760 25,760 25,760 25 25 25,760 25 25,760 25 25,760 25,760 25 25,760 12,880 TIF 01 -5 Revenues Total Amt. to City ( (6) 21,020 Total 21,020 ( 21,020 107,270 21,020 107,270 21,020 107,270 21,020 107 21,020 107 21,020 107,270 21,020 107,270 21,020 107,270 21,020 10 21,020 21 21,020 21 21,,020 21,020 21,020 21,020 21,020 21,020 21,020 21,020 21 21,020 21,020 21,020 21 21,020 21,020 21,020 21,020 10 TIF #1-6 Revenues Total Amt. to City ( ( 107,270 10,727 107,270 10 107,270 10,727 107 10,727 107 10 107,270 10 107,270 10 107,270 10 107,270 10,727 107 10,727 107 10,727 107,270 10,727 107 10,727 107,270 10,727 107,270 107,270 107,270 107,270 107,270 107 107,270 107,270 107,270 107,270 107,270 107,270 107 107 107,270 107,270 107,270 107,270 107 107,270 Total L Future value on Total Annul 211/2013 using Revenues for Revenues investment rate of Debt Service To City 5% (9) (10) (11) 10,727 20 10,727 19,264 10 18,347 10,727 17,473 10,727 16 10,727 15,849 10 15,094 10,727 14,375 10 13 10,727 13 34 39,495 57 63 57,507 60,382 57 57,507 384,785 154,050 154,050 154 154,050 154 154,050 154,050 154,050 154,050 154,050 154,050 154,050 154,050 154,050 130 130 107,270 107,270 107,270 107.270 Totals 384 1 * TIF revenues are based on projected collections for 1999 and were provided by City staff. The amounts in the columns, "Amt. to City" are based on cQ terms provided in the respective agreements for each TIF district. Future value calculations assume that annual tax increment revenues will not be fully Ln collected/fully invested until 2/1 following the year of collection. City of Maplewood General Obligation Tax Increment Capital Appreciation Bonds, Series 19998 TIF Districts 1 -4,1 -5 & 1 -6 SOURCES & USES Dated 10/27/1999 SOURCES OF FUNDS Delivered 10/27/1999 Par Amount of Bonds ........................ ............................... $1, 770, 000.00 Original Issue Discount ( OID) ............ ............................... (1, 050, 905.80) TOTAL SOURCES ............................ ............................... $719,094.20 USES OF FUNDS Available for Project Costs ................ ............................... 687,144.20 Costs of Issuance ............................. ............................... 19, 725.00 Total Underwriter's Discount (0.691 %) ............................. 12,225.00 TOTALUSES .................................... ............................... $719 Spfingsted Incorporated Pubk Finence Advisors Page 6 y City of Maplewood General Obligation Tax Increment Capital Appreciation Bonds, Series 19996 TIF Districts 1 -4,1 -5 & 1 -6 PRICING SUMMARY Maturity Type of Bond Coupon Yield Maturity Value Price Dollar Price 2/01/2013 Serial Coupon - 5.250% 380, 000.00 50.296% 191,124.80 210112014 Serial Coupon - 5.250% 150, 000.00 47.756% 71, 634.00 2/01/2015 Serial Coupon 5.300% 150, 000.00 45.009% 67,513-50 2/01/2016 Serial Coupon - 5.300% .150, 000.00 42.715% 64 2/01/2017 Serial Coupon - 5.350% 150,000.00 40.198°x6 60,297.00 2/01/2018 Serial Coupon - 5.350% .150, 000.00 38.131 % 57,196.50 2/01/2019 Serial Coupon - 5.350% 150,000.00 36.170°x6 54,255.00 2/01/2020 Serial Coupon - 5.450% 150,000.00 33.640% 50,460.00 2/0112021 Serial Coupon - 5.450°x6 130, 000.00 31.878% 41, 441.40 2/0112022 Serial Coupon - 5.500% 105,000.00 29.884°x6 31,378.20 2/01/2023 Serial Coupon - 5.500°x6 105,000.00 28.306°x6 29,721.30 Total - - - - 1, 770 000.00 - 719 BID INFORMATION Par Amount of Bonds ................ ............................... $1,770,000.00 Reoffering Premium or ( Discount ) ............................ (1, 050, 905.80) Gross Production ...................... ............................... $719,094.20 Total Underwriter's Discount (0.691%) ..................... $(12,225.00) Bid (39. 936%) ........................... ............................... 706, 869.20 Total Purchase Price ................. ............................... $706 Bond Year Dol lars ..................... ............................... $30,707.17 AverageWe .............................. ............................... 17.349 Years AverageCoupon ....................... ............................... - True Interest Cost ( TIC) ............ ............................... 5.4505582% Springsted Incorporated Pubic Finance Advisors Page 7 5pnngstoo Incorporated Pubic Finance adWsom Page 8 City of Maplewood General Obligation Tax Increment Capital Appreciation Bonds, Series 1999B TIF Districts 1 -4,1 -5 & 1 -6 REVENUE VS D/S Date Revenue Total Revenues Scheduled P +l D/S Fund Net Cash Flow Cash Balance 2/01/2000 2/01/2001 2/01/2002 2/01/2003 2/01/2004 2/01/2005 2/01/2006 2/01/2007 2/01/2008 2/01/2009 2/01t2010 2/01/2011 2/01/2012 2/0112013 384, 785.00 384, 785.00 380, 000.00 4 - 4 2/01/2014 154, 050.00 154, 050.00 150, 000.00 4 - 8 2/01/2015 154, 050.00 154, 050.00 150, 000.00 4 - 12, 885.00 2101/2016 154, 050.00 154, 050.00 150, 000.00 4 - 16, 935.00 2/01/2017 154 154, 050.00 150, 000.00 4 - 20, 985.00 2/01/2018 154, 050.00 154, 050.00 150, 000.00 4 - 25, 035.00 2/01/2019 154, 050.00 154, 050.00 150, 000.00 4 - 29, 085.00 2/01/2020 154, 050.00 154, 050.00 150, 000.00 4 - 33 2/01/2021 130, 660.00 130, 660.00 130, 000.00 660.00 - 33, 795.00 2/01/2022 107, 270.00 107, 270.00 105, 000.00 2 - 36, 065.00 i 1 /2023 107, 270.00 107, 270.00 105 (36, 065.00) 38 - Total 1, 808, 335.00 1, 808, 335.00 1, 770, 000.00 - 38 - 5pnngstoo Incorporated Pubic Finance adWsom Page 8 THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $719,094* CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1999B (CAPITAL APPRECIATION BONDS) (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, September 27, 1999, until 10:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3002 to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall - be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3002 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless of the manner of the Proposal submitted. DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated and shall bear interest from their date of settlement. Interest on the Bonds shall be compounded on August 1, 2000, and semiannually thereafter on February 1 and August 1 of each year, and will be payable, together with principal, only at maturity or upon prior redemption. The "original principal" as used herein is that principal amount which, when accreted at its associated interest rate until its scheduled maturity date, results in a payment described hereinafter as its "maturity value." These maturity values will be in $5,000 denominations or integral multiples thereof. The Bonds are being issued in the aggregate original principal amount of approximately $719,094. The rates specified by the successful purchaser will determine the original principal amount of each bond. The maturity values will be paid on February 1 in the amounts and years as follows: 2013 $380,000 2017 $150,000 2021 $130,000 2014 $150 2018 $150,000 2022 $105,000 2015 $150 2019 $150 2023 $105,000 2016 $150,000 2020 $150,000 The City reserves the right, after bids are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the 2013 through 2023 maturity values, in multiples of $5,000 in order to result in an original principal amount of approximately $719,094. Page 9 Within 48 hours of award, the successful purchaser shall provide a table of accreted values for a $5,000 maturity value of each maturity as of each February 1 and August 1 through its maturity date based on semiannual compounding at the interest rate specified for such Bonds, from the assumed settlement date of October 27, 1999. In case of discrepancy, the City's. calculation of accreted values shall be controlling. BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal and 1nterest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the Bonds with DTC. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The Bonds will not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity dates. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge available tax increment revenues from the City's Tax Increment Districts Nos. 1 -4,1 -5 and 1 -6. The proceeds will be used for a scattered site housing project. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall include annual interest rates for each specified maturity and a purchase price for the Bonds, expressed as a percentage, which purchase price shall be no less than 98.30% of the total original principal amount. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $71,910, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany the proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The City Page 10 will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting f the City scheduled for g tY award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in level or ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis evaluated as of October 27, 1999. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: `(i) waive non- substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the - issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating g agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT On or about October 27, 1999, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for payment. Page 11 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE On the date of the actual issuance and delivery of the Bonds, the City will execute and deliver a Continuing Disclosure Undertaking whereunder the City will covenant to provide, or cause to be provided, annual financial information, including audited financial statements of the City, and notices of certain material events, as specified in and required by SEC Rule 15c2-12(b)(5). OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223 -3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date .of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 50 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Dated August 23, 1999 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Karen Guilfoile City Clerk Pa , 2 AGENDA NO. �S Action by Council: Endorsed-_.__�___ AGENDA REPORT 1loaifi.d_.,___.,,,,,, Rejected Date TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director /e�,>� RE: 2000 PROPOSED BUDGET DATE: August 11, 1999 Attached is a press release on the Proposed 2000 Budget. Details on the budget are in the booklet which is scheduled to be distributed this week. In order to comply with the provisions of the Truth in Taxation law, the Council must adopt a Proposed 2000 Budget and proposed tax levy payable in 2000 prior to September 15. Review and discussion of the proposed budget is scheduled for the Council- Manager meeting on Tuesday, September 7. PAFINANCE \WP\AGN \00BUDMET.WPD PRESS RELEASE 2000 PROPOSED BUDGET -CITY OF MAPLEWOOD SMALL TAX INCREASE PROPOSED The 2000 Proposed Budget prepared under the direction of Michael McGuire, City Manager, recommends a tax levy for 2000 of $7.6 million which is 1.9% higher than 1999. For the past three years the tax levy has been held at $7.4 million. This is the result of a budget preparation process that P involves close scrutiny of proposed expenditures and a constant search for non -tax revenues. Utility rates will be decreased by 17.0% in the 2000 Budget. This will cause the quarterly utility bill on an average home to decrease from $55.14 in 1999 to $45.75 in the year 2000. Current hydrant charges g will be sufficient to finance the 2000 Budget but sewer rates will be decreased by 22.4 %. This is because operating expenses are decreasing and the Sanity Sewer Fund has a surplus balance. Most Sanitary p of the revenues from the sewer rates finance the Metropolitan Council sewage treatment charges to Maplewood which will be 71.3% of the operating expenses for the Sanitary Sewer Fund in 2000. The sewage treatment charges for 2000 are anticipated to be $2,114,400 which is $414,190 (16.4 %) less than the 1999 budget. Most of this decrease is due to reduction in rates charged by the Metropolitan Council rather than a change a sewage flow. The Metropolitan Council sewage treatment rates decreased in 1998 and are anticipated to decrease annually through 2001. Another factor contributing to the 22.4 % sewer rate decrease is the surplus balance in the Sanitary Sewer Fund. One -fifth of the surplus balance has been used for reducing the sewer rates in 2000 and it is planned that this policy will be continued in the future. The sewer rate reduction in 2000 caused by use of the surplus balance is 7 %. The decrease in sewer rates will be partly offset by an increase in recycling rates. Recycling charges are being increased because the surplus in the Recycling Program Fund has been eliminated as planned when the recycling charges were decreased by 60% in 1999. The 2000 Proposed Budget will maintain the level of services provided by all departments. Proposed expenditures for Operations in 2000 are $24.2 million which is 3.3% more than 1999. This is higher than the anticipated inflation rate for 2000 because of city commercial growth and population increases that have averaged 1.8% annually over the past three years. The number of full -time employees included in the 2000 Budget is 146. This is an increase of one over the original 1999 Budget. Six dispatcher positions have been .eliminated (due to the transfer of the dispatching function to Ramsey County in 1999) and seven positions have been added, five of which are in public safety. They include a police officer, community service officer /paramedic, community service officer and the part -time secretary and assistant fire chief positions have been changed to full -time. Also a MIS /GIS technician and recreation program assistant have been added. Proposed expenditures in the year 2000 for capital improvements are $9.4 million which is $7.4 million more than 1999. The capital improvements portion of the budget covers the acquisition and construction of major facilities other than those financed by the Operating Budget. Proposed expenditures next year for debt service are $4.3 million which is 21.9% more than 1999. This portion of the budget covers the payment of principal and interest on the City's bonded indebtedness. The total proposed expenditures in the year 2000 for operations, capital improvements and debt service are $37.9 million which is 31.1 % more than 1999. P: \FINANCE \WP\AGN \00BUDPRE.WPD