Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 02-08 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, February 8, 1999 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 99 -03 1 1.9 • At C. ROLL CALL 1 ll_ 1. Minutes of Meeting 98 -02 (January 25, 1999) Ma NONE I - - - "Ifflali All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Harvester Avenue, Project 97 -16, MnDOT Limited Use Permit 3. °Plumbing Inspection :Fees. 4. Acceptance of Donation - 'Robert & Carolyn Odegard 5. Acceptance of Donation - Northeast Soccer Association (NESA) 6. Temporary Liquor License - Church of Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary 7. Transfers from Tax Increment Funds 8. Transfers to Close Debt Service Funds for Two Bond Issues 9. 1999 Labor Contracts and Agreements 10. Vehicle Replacement 11. City Manager Evaluation I iMaKam X l 1. 7:00 P.M. Pleasantview Park Neighborhood Streets, Project 98 -12 (4 votes) 2. 7:15 P.M. Nationwide Group Acorn Mini - Storage (West side of Highway 61) 1. Conditional Use Permit 2. Design Approval 3. 7:30 P.M. Maplewood Auto Service (743 Century Avenue North) 1. Conditional Use Permit 2. Design Approval 4. 7:45 P.M. Just - for -Feet Curbing Variance (3090 Southlawn Drive) L : X9 J UNFINISHED`BUSINESS NONE K. NEW BUSINESS 1. On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License - Scott M. Formaro 2. Consider Location of Tot Lot at Four Seasons Park and Recommend Equipment Purchase from Game Time Manufacturing 3. Kevin Berglund Letter 4. Bob Zick Letter 1. 2. M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Committee Reports 2. 3. 4. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Bruentrup Farm 2. 3. MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, January 25, 1999 Maplewood Community Center Theater Meeting No. 99-02 1 A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Ma lewood Community Center Theater, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Rossbac . 4401flalINT144. C. ROLL CALL: George F. Rossbach, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present Kevin Kittridge, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present Councilmember Kittridge moved to aDDrove the minutes of Meeting No 98 -01 (January 11, 19991 as Dresented. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - al 1 Councilmember Carlson moved to aDDrove the minutes of the Council /Manager WorkshoD (January- 4, 999) as presented. If Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilmember Carlson moved to aDDrove the Agenda as submitted Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS 1 -25 -99 1 NONE i'l 111 _ Councilmember Kittridge moved to approve the Consent Agenda as recommended. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: 259,276.02 150,002.44 70,282.34 69,031.30 548,592.10 Ayes - all Checks #7754 - 7768 Dated 01 -04 -99 thru 01 -08 -99 Checks #41699 - #41857 Dated 01 -12 -99 Checks #7769 - #7777 Dated 01 -12 -99 thru 01 -15 -99 Checks #41861 - #41961 Dated 01 -19 -99 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: $ 294,052.93 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits Dated 01 -08 -99 22 Payroll Deduction Checks #70046 - 70059 Dated 01 -08 -99 316,508.54 Total Payroll 865,100.64 GRAND TOTAL 2. Fire Services Contract Approved contract for City of Maplewood to enter into agreement with the City of Landfall for fire services for 1999. 3. Order Feasibility Study, Harvester Area Streets, Project 98 -10 Approve'dthe following resolution ordering the preparation of the feasibility study for the Harvester Area Neighborhood Streets, Project 98 -10. RESOLUTION 98 -01 -04 ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR PROJECT 98 -10 WHEREAS, it is proposed to replace the Harvester Avenue Neighborhood Streets, Ferndale Street, Midvale Street, Brand Avenue, Michael Lane, Edith Street, Evar Street and Glendon Street, and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota States, Chapter 429, 1 -25 -99 2 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD> MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in the preliminary was as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $8500 are appropriated to prepare this feasibility report. 4. Plumbing Inspection Fees This item was pulled from the agenda. 5. Joint :;Power ..Agreement between the City of. Oakdale- and City of Maplewood regarding the Operation of Skyview Pool 'and Tanners Beach Recommended that the Joint.Powers Agreement as amended be approved by the City Council and that the program will be evaluated in one year. H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. Ramsey County Family Services Center 1. Comprehensive Plan Change (Park to Government) 2. Conditional Use Permit 3. Design Approval a. Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting fora public hearing. b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Loraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. e. Boardmember Anath Shankar presented the Community Design Review Board report. f. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings. g. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons (76) were heard: Michael Griffin, 328 W. Kellogg Blvd. - St. Paul Douglas Dickausen, 2049 Northwood Drive - N. St. Paul Gary Unger, 1847 E. Idaho - St. Paul Harland Hess, 2472 Flandrau - Maplewood Lynn Carver, 2033 N. 7th Street - N. St. Paul Jay Delveaux, 1936 Kingston Ave. - Maplewood Father Larry Snyder, Catholic Charities, 1200 2nd Ave. - Minneapolis 1 -25 -99 3 Fred Vogele, 3817 Greshamwayn - Oakdale Bill Gamache, 5286 Heath Avenue N - Oakdale Paul Gilliland, 1409 McAfle St. - St. Paul Chuck Dier, 2015 English St. - Maplewood Pat Myckleby, 2220 Craig Place - Maplewood Sister Jana Roberts, 1750 Marion Street - Roseville Carol Knauss, 1745 Gulder Place - St. Paul Myrna Nelson, 334 Cherokee Ave. - St. Paul Dr. Joe Norquist, 2087 Greenbrier St. - Maplewood Cathy Boehm, 53 Sterling Street - Maplewood Arnold Stenhlm, 1743 E Iowa Aave. - St. Paul Monica Nilsson, 1047 S. Howell St. Joseph A. Zappa, 2522 Flandrau - Maplewood Mary White, 2675 E. Lar enteur - St. Paul Connie Elirt. 18.01 Mary noll - Maplewood Josephine Kusz, 1601 E. Hoyt'Ave. - St. Paul Jean Strub, 1947 Flandrau - Maplewood Robert G. Walz, St. Paul Area Council of Churches, Karen Eastman, 2246 Skillman Avenue - N. St. Paul Kevin Berglund, 1929 Kingston Ave. - Maplewood Ery Barrett, 1607 Christie Place - St. Paul Anne Weyandt, 1415 Hilo Ave.N. - Oakdale Michelle Urbanski, 1442 E. Lark - Maplewood Dino Guerin - Ramsey County Commissioner Shirley Klitzke, 1812 Sterling St. - Maplewood Virginia Pederson, 1875 Flandrau - Maplewood Ann Woods, 1961 Sherwood - St. Paul Candy Petersen, 2618 Belmont Lane - N. St.Paul David Austad, 1900 Furness St.- - Maplewood Mary Weyardt, 1415 Hilo Ave. N - Oakdale George H. Johnson, 1946 Larpenteur Ron Peterson, Gustavus - St. Paul Jeff Worman, 14960 Xylite Street NE - Ham Lake Vi Lincowski, 460 Highpoint Curve - Maplewood Mary Claire Ryan, 593 Sterling St. - Maplewood Valerie Neisius, White Bear Business Association Steve Genheimer, 3718 Gershwin Lane - Oakdale Rev. James Erlandson, 1901 Walter St. - Maplewood JoAnne Parenteax, 1733 Barclay - Maplewood Maria Duwenboegger, 358 Highpoint Curve - Maplewood 1671 Summit Ave. Bob Bruton, 2856 Lake Blvd - N. St. Paul Peter Fischer, 2443 Standridge Avenue - Maplewood Robert D. Brough, 538 Peter Street #206 - St. Paul Linda McDonough -Rees - 1715 E. Larpenteur Avenue - Maplewood Mary A. Casselton, 1871 N. McKnight - Maplewood Dave Hulke, 1831 White Bear Ave. - Maplewood Rita Ander, 2050 Holloway - Maplewood Connie Pelter, 1835 Manton, Maplewood Barbara Skoglund, 1969 Price Avenue, Maplewood Tim Butler, 1967 Payne Ave. - Maplewood Pete Boulay, 1100 E. Co. Rd. C - Maplewood Lowell Colliander, 1839 Barclay Street, Maplewood Bob Zick, 1880 E. Shore Dr. - Maplewood Dick Zangs, 2071 E. California - St. Paul 1 -25 -99 Greg Copeland, 612 E. Cook Ave. - St. Paul Jeff Williams, 1890 Barclay St. — Maplewood Lori LaBy, 1758 Waik Ave. - Mapleowood Father, Michael Reding, 1735 Kennard St. - Maplewood Carrie Wasby, 762 Geranium - St. Paul J. Tacheny, Edina Realty, 2303 Minnehaha - Maplewood Ruth Santella, 1579 Cottage Regina LaRocke Thiene - Maplewood HRC Irene Ripley, 2276 Holloway Ave. - Maplewood Sue Butler, 1967 Payne Ave. - Maplewood Mark D. Bradley Sr., 2164 Woodlynn Avenue - Maplewood Beth Blick, 401 Ashland Aven #9, St. Paul Mary Schoenborn, 2649 Midvale Place - Maplewood Sandra Nelson, 1510 Eastshore Dr., St. Paul Howard Muraski, 55 McC,lel"land St. - Maplewood g. Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing at 12:00 p.m.. Councilmember Carlson (12:05 a.m.) moved to extend the meeting until the agenda was completed. Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - all Councilmember Kittridge moved/ introduced the followina Resolution amendina the COmDrehensiye Plan for the Ramsey County Family Service Center, Ramsey Nursing Home and County barn with staff recommendations and moved its adoDtion: RESOLUTION 99 -01 -05 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ramsey County applied fora change to the city's land use plan from P (parks) to G (government facility). WHEREAS, the city staff proposed a change to the city's land use plan from P (parks) to G (government facility) for the Ramsey Nursing Home site and the county barn site to bring the land use plan into conformance with these uses. WHEREAS, this change applies to the Ramsey Nursing Home (2000 White Bear Avenue), the proposed Family Service Center northeast of the nursing home and the county barn (2020 White Bear Avenue). The legal description is: SUBJ TO AVE THE W 620 FT OF N 438 FT OF SW 1/4 AND W 620 FT OF S 235 8/10 FT OF NW 1/4 ALSO N 52 FT OF S 287 8/10 FT OF W 160 05/100 SD NW 1/4 ALL IN SEC 14 TN 29 RN 22 SUBJ TO AUES AND ESMTS AND EX W 620 FT OF N 438 FT THE W 810 FT OF N % OF SW 1/4 OF SEC 1 -25 -99 01 14 TN 29 RN 22 WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1 On December 21, 1998, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the land use plan change. 2. On January 25, 1999, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described change because: 1. This change for the proposed Family Service Center would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's goals and policies by providing housing and services to meet the needs of nontraditional households. 2. This change would correct the land use plan map by incorporating the Ramsey Nursing Home site and the county barn site into the G classification rather than the current P classification. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Kittridge, & Allenspach Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember Koppen MOTION FAILED Councilmember Kittridge moved /introduced the following Resolution aDDroving a Conditional Use Permit for the Ramsey County Family Service Center and amend 3C- sidewalk Mayor Rossbach moved to amend the 10 items he added to the Conditional Use Permit Councilmember Kittridge accepted the 10 added conditions submitted by Mayor Rossbach as listed below and the amendment made by Carlson on 3C- sidewalk and moved its adoDtion: RESOLUTION 99 -01 -06 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ramsey County applied for a conditional use permit for a family service center. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the site northeast of the Ramsey Nursing Home at 2000, White Bear Avenue. The legal description is: SUBJ TO AVE THE W 620 FT OF N 438 FT OF SW 1/4 AND W 620 FT OF S 235 8/10 FT OF NW 1/4 ALSO N 52 FT OF S 2878/10 FT OF W 160 05/100 SD NW 1/4 ALL IN SEC 14 TN 29 RN 22 AND 1 -25 -99 S SUBJ TO AVES AND ESMTS AND EX W 620 FT OF N 438 FT THE W 810 FT OF N 2 OF SW 1/4 OF SEC 14 TN 29 RN 22 WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On December 21, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On January 25, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the. hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, e uipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, Jisturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for. public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 10. The proposed Family Service Center is considered a governmental use and is consistent with the of er Ramsey County facilities and operations such as the adjacent Nursing Home. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 1 -25 -99 7 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The county shall add more parking to the site if the city council deems it necessary. 5. Before issuance of a building permit, the County shall provide concrete evidence of a negotiated agreement with the local school government regarding all logistical and financial ramifications incurred by this establishment. 6. There shall be no increase in size or capacity of the structure 7. The County shall assume financial responsibility -for all services provided to the residents of the Shelter that would normally be charged to the citizens (Example: Ambulance and paramedic runs) 8. All elements of the listed Emergency Housing Program Parameters shall remain in force unless a change is agreed to by the City Council at a subsequent CUP review. 9. The County shall arrange with the contractor to assure no loss of space or utilities, normally available to the 1999 Ramsey County Fair, shall occur. 10. All heretofore and subsequent agreements regarding restitution and expansion of the area for County Fair purposed shall be completed before a certificate of occupancy is issued. The new access to the lower level as agreed upon by the fair board and the county shall be completed before the 1999 fair. Other improvements shall include by not be limited to legitimate handicapped access to the barn upper level, and all other improvements discussed in the fair board negotiations. 11. Parking spaces on the North side of the designated East - West van Dyke Ave. Shall be redesigned in accordance with the concerns o the Fair. Board in the use of this area. The new layout shall meet the approval of the fair Board and the City. Each year at a prearranged time before and during fair week, all these new parking areas shall be evacuated fro the use of the fair board at their discretion, it the use of these is an advantage to them. 12. All disturbed electrical and other utilities, which affect the fair operation, shall be completely restored and ready for the 1999 fair. 13. If at any time, the City Council determines there is a need, the County will contract for, or provide from their own staff, security patrols in the complex bounded by the Willard Munger Trail, White Bear Avenue, Ri ley Street, and the Goodrich Golf course. Times and extent of the patrol will be estab fished at that point in time. 14. This Conditional Use Permit will be reviewed annually, and if in the opinion of the City Council, any evidence of negative repercussion to the area, or valid reason that the facility causes undue hardship ro the resident has occurred, the city may revoke the Conditional Use Permit with no financial obligations to the city, and the normal amortization process would ne apply. The County would them have one hundred and twenty 1220) days to cease operations as a homeless shelter and devote the structure to,an acceptable planned backup use such as elderly care. 1 -25 -99 15 . All portions of the Conditional Use Permit and land. use plan shall be agreed to by the county and a letter agreeing to all elements of the same shall be submitted to the city before issuance of a building permit. 16. Ramsey County shall be responsible for the maintenance and plowing on the sidewalk along White Bear Avenue from the County facilities to the Gateway Trail. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmember Kittridge & Carlson, Mayor Rossbach Nays - Councilmembers Koppen & Allenspach. Councilmember Kittridge moved to approved the plans (stamped November 13, 1998) for the proposed Ramsey County Family Service Center, based on findings required by the code The property owner, Ramsey County, shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, the 'applicant shall provide the following for staff approval: a. A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan. b. A sidewalk /trail plan for the extension and connection to the Gateway Trail. c. A revised site plan showing the handicap parking next to the front sidewalk. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure for any outside trash containers. The enclosures must be 100 percent opaque, match the color of the building and have a closeable gate that extends to the ground. If the trash container is not visible to the public it does not have to be screened. b. Install all required landscaping. An in- ground lawn irrigation system is not required since there are county maintenance personnel on site to water landscaped areas. c. Construct, maintain & plow the sidewalk /trail extension and connection along White Bear Avenue. d. Screen any roof -top mechanical equipment that would be visible from the Ramsey Nursing Home. Any other roof -top units that are visible from any other direction must be painted to match the building. e. The screening mentioned in 3.a. and d. shall be subject to staff approval. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the 1 -25 -99 9 required work. The amount shall be 200% of the cost of the unfinished work. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson I . AWARD OF BIDS NONE J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS NONE K. NEW BUSINESS NONE L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS NONE M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS NONE N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS NONE Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge, Carlson & Mayor Rossbach Nays - Councilmember Koppen 0. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Carlson motioned to adjourn the meeting at 12:42 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - al l Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk 1 -25 -99 10 AGENDA NO. G -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: February 1, 1999 Action by C®txnol, Endorsed........ codified_______ Red acted.,.,.__,_„___ 13ate Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes.. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 12,532.43 Checks #7778 thru #7780 dated 1 -21 thru 1 -22 -99 66,692.64 Checks #41965 thru #42035 dated 1 -26 -99 164,688.93 Checks #7781 thru #7797 dated 1 -25 thru 1 -29 -99 84,480.30 Checks #42039 thru #42141 dated 2 -2 -99 328,394.30 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: 414,940.48 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 1 -22 -99 20,637.64 Payroll Deduction check #70392 thru #70401 dated 1 -22 -99 435,578.12 Total Payroll 763 , 972.42 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. hu Attachments 1 t.Jf,'HRE*2 x?2/99 14:55 VENDOFZ N I i M Y.3 E_* f 210270 900175 190400 01.0,120 02041.1. 0,2;0420 0*3,0660 041.1500 061.906 41971. 01/26/99 41972 01/26/99 41973 01/26/99 070200 O71.;!, 5 0 080925 41.974 01/26/99 1.20525 41.975 01/26/99 1.50900 41976 01/26/99 1. 1.:. 1. 131 9 0 41977 01/26/99 151.000 41978 01/26/99 '?005 ;0 41979 01/26/99 2.--.*:,()9()0 CITY OF Mrif"LEW001) F*Of ALL F IMFIER DAT"r-7 7770 01/21/99 7779 0:1/:%1 7780 01/22/99 41965 01/26/99 41.966 01/26/99 41967 01/26/99 41960 01/26/99 41969 01/26/99 41970 01/26/99 VENDOFZ N I i M Y.3 E_* f 210270 900175 190400 01.0,120 02041.1. 0,2;0420 0*3,0660 041.1500 061.906 41971. 01/26/99 41972 01/26/99 41973 01/26/99 070200 O71.;!, 5 0 080925 41.974 01/26/99 1.20525 41.975 01/26/99 1.50900 41976 01/26/99 1. 1.:. 1. 131 9 0 41977 01/26/99 151.000 41978 01/26/99 '?005 ;0 41979 01/26/99 2.--.*:,()9()0 CITY OF Mrif"LEW001) F*Of ALL F VENDOFN'A NAME- DONALD cSIALVE A c,,'S 0 1 A T E.c7JRI)A RE.131ST17ZATION FEE .... M E:* fZ 1: Cc0N Ii.i6l . -.FlOSTACiE I I"ElRMIT #490*3 DEPT. OF NA11JR-Al. IR1-:.-S0LJFZc..',.Fc9 I::'Fj.7CDNr-Z L 1; F-AYAW-E A. M. E. M.MEMf.lEI:d33HlF'S ADRITH.)(11 CE-1-1-1JLAF- DELI ... E v(Jr TIC L.Ef-140NE ANDE*RGON. E_VEI:d:_-f-r A MIL-EAGE IREIMB. lN%('3F'. -325 MI. ANIMAL- C',()NTRC)L- c.)%EFZVIC'.Ecl)'., INC:.ANIMAL.. C,0N*TfZ0L.. 1./1/99-••:I./1ll:`j/99 A,l3'F•EN Mll-L-S tJN.TF'0IRMS c: L -133 BALJE7R 13L.1313'Sl-JPPl_lE'S VEHIC"LE' BATTERY BE*CI,:*EfZ AFZE-NA FIZOI)tX-TS. INC:.BLIJE F'(41NI" BE FTENDORF R01-11REIR KNOt"HE WAL-1-09--21. 110ARD OF WATER (-.0MMlSlc;l0NE7_IRcu;2100 113; 0 1902 eis 1685 LB45 153 0 ENTIJIRY (*l%OLA_E'GE EMT .13HOIR*l*REED3 OMMI%(3)l%,3'*I'.0NEIR OF' TIRAN1.3 )POIRTAT ION 9W-05 Cf)Mf:*IJTF.7F( SHOFIF'Er-Z SLJBEi'(',IRTP*T'l0Nc,)% & MEi . S DATA '(W'.ADD'L PROG. - PARKS & TRAIL SURVEY DICI'AF440NE. C0FZP0FZAT*I0N 1999 MAINT. CONTRACT Er OI"*FI(`E IMiWiING CO. C0.V. 9B COF tk3AGE I3:11..1 -. NOV. 911 C(*)F:'].*ER LK5AGl-:.' B 11.1. NOV. 9B (JS'Af3I:.* Bll ... I... NOV. 90 f,'0f: t. J t )A Ci I.- Il 1'. 1 - I.. NOV. 98 (*.lOFllc_:_ 1.1.131ito. 1:3:1:1._1_. NC) ,) qj:.j ( ,' C)f ., ]'[71-Z L I El A Ci E' 1 :3 ] :I. »1 NOV 98 (*,% f J F'l E'fZ NOV. 190 (X.)F`I.'ER 13111.. NCiv. 913 ('. 11 () F1: 1. U:-* 1: z t. J! *: i G IH 14 ITEM t4OlJN*T 722 . 43 1.0. 0 J. oo 60.00 12:L . 0 91.00 1 y 115.58 267.00 109. ti ; (:3 90.40 66.96 1. 790.87 42.07 1. 6. 82!, 5.05 1.5.1.4- 18.96 5.05 50.00 996.00 5. 340. 00 55.97 77(:3.89 1. ., 449. 75 2'.5- . 70 25. 70 85 69.19 61.49 14.66 20 611.... 76 AmOt.)N*r 7 2 2 r 4-3, i (). 000 w oo I. 60.00 0 -3, 91.00 I -j .1. 15. 58 267.00 199.78 66-96 1 F)9',',. 97 J., 046. 3 55.97 77B..(39 1.1449.75 C' , I *TY C)F7 MAF'.-I 2 W22199 1. 55 F*W ALL PEJ-U01)(:; C1--lE--C,*:VF7NI)C)F.*,'V E: N D 0 F;,'I T 17 m NAMIE.DE,G)C-11:TFITIDN AMOUNT NC)V. 90 CMPIEJ. Uc.;AGE. 1311-1.56.9 +.,304.79 41. 980 01/26/99 260290 F'AR"MM .61W)113. CO.Ml)%'*:)'U:-*. FOFZ F E.*S'IALE 228. 70 228.70 41983.01/26/99 260400 FAUST. I)ANIK-:-'L INTEIML'T 1.29.00 1.29.00 4:1.902 01/26/99 260640 1. 3'1' LINE ( EVl::*lW'W*A:-'Ml)'%.:)E. F'OR FZ0123ALE:915.00 4:1.90'zi,01/26/99 3100500 6 & t SE7r.ZV I C% [7 C%UN C'.LOTHING 2H. 00 Jl-"*I--*L- JANI-Y'01i:[ AL 41.62 LJNIF*OF;,'Mcl; & Cl-01141NG 6 ,.01. UNIFOIRMS & (.11.0THING 76. EIG Ul & Cj 25.07 27*%*-5. 29 41904 01/26/99 3 C)UP HE--'AL.Tl-4 F-LAN., INC,'.Z-51 0 0 . 0 {)00 »00 41.9(35 01 /26/99 G1UJI-JEW.13' F'0WEr-Z EQUIPMEW M(-^UNTEt4AN(`• 7 MAT J'78.49 79. 49 41.986 01/26/99 3401.1-0 E7H JNY INC.'VIE I JJM DAR17-76.613 76.60 4:1.907 01/26/99 300812 1 1 .j ' ( ' V[ :* fZ ' F7Y . ) -SERVICE CONTRACT 149.00 149.. 00 41980 01/26/99 3901.04 NI)E':*F:'E:'Nl)l::-*Nl' SCHC)(:)I- DIST. 0,6•2 Df7 f.-L-**NC ) *'j:VF7 J)F,JVINC 1.6.50 1.6.50 4:1.989 O1 /':;.6/99 41.0370 KATH W6T'U:-*R FUMP. PLUG FIEATEJ:68.69 68. 69 41990 01./26*/99 4:; 0:.•;00 K.N(AILAN'S lcl)L INC:.10CMA. NUTS 3. Z!, 7 27. 33,35.70 4199 1.01/26/99 4:, 09!30 N C .7 CK. R E 3'. . I %) & t.:'R E I N INC,..Mf7.MBE:-*R Sl--D'PS 1.0.00 1.0.00 4:1.992 01/26/99 440900 P:.*V()m. DAV JN*r1-'011Mlc)% & ('11-OTHING 34.00 84. 4 19 9,!,01/26/99 4501.20 L. M. C:. I. T.I N t- %) L J F%'* A N (%. E 4. 3 f- I ( -:) .6 6 4,'%-.!MB. 66 41994 01/26/99 4'.50490 LAND'. MGMT HAND.BK I....13MI-1830 L A-oAKWl* MfJ'M*T. H(52.57 2. 57 41995 01/26/99 460000 I -1 ... E, L.. C' )j - 4E7j : ZR I r --AC' 'I * 1:C)J F**C'DR _ f A )(.*I I , -11.96 1.1 .96 41.O1 /26/99 460t:545 LEAGUE 01::* M'.C)-,!Nt::*.%13C)*I'(-)31JD'%3("FZ.'1FT-[0N'l*)' & MEMDERf3:)l--l'[P'%3 170.06 170.06 41.997 01/26/99 4 7 0 7.'.! 5 1 ... INDDLOM., RANDAL MM D01 'ITZAININCi -- L.UNC%,H 7.67 7.67 41. 998 01/•6/99 500650 m . F .1.3 . ll-1:.'**Y*' - * - .1 ( )1r M 1 _ C 2%.-; . 0 0 25.00 4:1.999 O1./26/99 500800 M.T.I. WISTFUBUTING C,%().B1 ... Alk'6%-.!,6. O*z!,*6 Zr, 6 . 0,; 4'2000 01/26/99 lcJ:L0:1.00 3N.V01 ... I ... [:-* YE (A I ... L. GAME 01::*I::'I(.';.*[Al ...4.00 54. 00 42001 01/26/99 510500 MAPLEMOOD 1304-:*ERY Cl. () () K I *. E* IS.69 ZT, . 6 _7 69;: ;.67 11 10 U I E* 2 CITY 0F.* M(AFILE141 A.1.4.-55 FOR ALL FIF-A-JAD'S CIAEXIT:VENDOR VF:-*NDClR I TEM UMBER 11NA T E:N(1MESE'R Nej4riE7 DC'*. IS C"R I I Tl ON AMOUNT AMOUNT 42002 01/26/99 540175 Ml*])W(:.*ct%)I* CIC)CA-COLA BOTTLING CC).MDSE: FOR RESALA-7 1.1.7.450 MI) ' - 1= OR 403. 1.0 S 0 4200 S O1./26*/99 542440 MINNE.130TA SAFETY C0UNC-IL L.*Ill::.*• :. (SAFEKTY Mf)NUAL 35. 40 35.40 42004 01/26/99 tr-R-50220 MN CIVCLET:113 OF F"T'l ONE3 8,21. 0.00 210.00 42005 01/26/99 620600 MU SPA L IGHTING C*ENTER LAW C;36 . 77 6. 77 42006 01/26/99 X5:.509:10 NIATIONW 1))U7 ADVEAVE S* NC-j (il:*RV.*[(.*:E:-'EMI'l ... C)y 7MENT Al 951.60 9!.*.*i:L 6 0 42007 01/26/99 660500 NO. ST. PAL) I_--M C% j[7RSH1*F:C) ), . .1 1.40.00 1.4-0-00 420(.A3 01/26/99 661175 NORTHERN AIR CORP UNIT HEATER r, B 4 . 68 42009 01/26/99 66:1. 1.01.NOR"THERN AIRG04S OXYGEEN FJTT ING"S 422.55 422.55 420:1.0 01/26/99 661755 WRTFIET-ZN STATE!:*)' F,OWER I.6%72.07 21,45 13.77 113 *3 0 8 062. 4.5 9 672 1. 0 42011 01/26/99 690340 11 ... SON. ARNOLD G MILEAGE RE" "IM13. BI ... DG. XN.I:")F*.24 . -;56 MILEAGE-* REIMBLIR.SEAE'NT 77 MI.21.56 45..92 42012 01/26/99 710200 STACY/ALF'INE. AIR PRI AIR 1:'IJI:Z.*11:-**(*[:-'R 2715.18 275.18 4: 0 01/26/99 71.1500 F*'HYlc;l0-•(:C)NTR0L CORPORATICW 1_.IFE.-TY-47' CABLES)0 6 6 86-36 420:1.4 01/26/99 740280 F•:. T{. WHITAC'RE & C*O.. INC.GLAS'S & GUARD1.3 1.9.7£1 19.78 42015 01/26/99 7 L,.; Ot-i L,-; 0 RE-*lJ*4ARl* :l*k4c,;*T**.[**f*(.ITI*O4irtL- f7()C)I)S MI)SEE'. 1::C)F"* RE*SAL J7 285.54 85. 12016 01/26/99 780*.-S&T OF*F:':[("[:-* F'R(JD(JC*T'lS% INc.62.('0 S )UPPL"I ES ) C)f.-f7lCE 20.26 1.3 1 J F , P L - TF_:; C)F .- f7 I (;E 24..72 20-.02 FIRIESENTATION BOARD, GEL 2 01..1. El GliFT'LAE'S F.'Q Ul PMEN T 1130.44 2., A' 1. 42017 01/26/(i 9 700600 CLAR.?MI)SE. F01:1 Rl: ... E:.1.04.27- sir" 'S cl ... UB 207..77 1. 0 13, IC) 42018 01/26/99 C' N'Y ER M A A&*') E:'.' (S)0 0 4201.9 01/26/99 820f,540 SMITH It YEi,)F-%L.Y F(UNTAL.408. 00 408.00 OU(:HRI.Ury OF* MAPLEWOOD 4/22/99 1.VC)I.)(* /(',I-11:*.( RE F-OR ALL 1"E'R.IODS MUCI•IER/ I - - I E _-- (; I CHECT VEINDOR VF. N 1) (3 F Z 1: TEM C•E.-CT: Aljm):-D A * Y E:NUMBER NA. M17:DEEISCRIFIT ION AMOUNT 6MGL1NT 42020 01/26/99 82, 1400 SF'ARTAN F:'R()MC)*T]*.(*)Ni,*it- GROUP INCI.UNIFORNS & CLOTHING 75 6r,-; . OE,365. 06 4202:1.01/26/99 1340405 ST. (-"].-.) -y or:-IRAD 10 %(:;[---I;:V. & MAT NT' . F*OR DEC'90 717.01. RADIO SERV. & MAINT. FIN%'0M. J.5 96-72 39911; . 91. WATER ME-TER LISAGE 913 1. t 4 A * Y'L-*:-* 1: ME--TEAR Iff3AGE. 98 1. p 'O l . 4 --!, 96....480.02 96--J.9 1.6. 91. 42022 01/26/99 575343't STRETCHER'S FIEMICAL .1*3FIRAY 21 32 LEATHER GOODS 1.22.42 9. 7 4202,*,01/26/99 01".50395 1.31UNRoY 40.60 PLUG IAEA ER 26.70 TRANY FILTER j!2. 22 TRANNY FILTER 10.76 FILTEER 49. 73 160.01. 42024 01/26/99 850400 SUNFZi,W T'IRLIE--- VALAJE7 PAIR GLOVE-S, RC)F 9.62 9.62 42025 01/26/99 350674 SUFTERIOR SERVIC"ES DEC' 90 UZE-CYCL-D-43 113 30. 11 18,680.11 42026 01./26/99 06041.0 I*SE::. INC.JANITORIAL ',:%E 7 4c")i1 w4S 42027 01/26/99 33130.501 TIREADWAY 1-;P*lRPol-l--1 C.,*E3 T 4!J 0 5 0 450.50 4202EI 01/26/99 080t.550 TRI-COUNTY LAW E*.Nr-7C)FZCj7 MENT YEj-')•L.Y M(-:.*Ml-'.iE1:*<"-';1-41.*P DUF-:cS r; { . 00 50.00 42029 01/26/99 880800 I ITRUCK* U * Y '* 1 _. I * I '* L .-.*I:% MF76 .HiMi'Al. HOS SWIVELEEMD., SWIVEL 45 . 45 MAINT[7NANCE MATE-RIALS 2g.:; . 5- 6 71.01. 4M'SO 01/26/99 1: 1 E? * 1. 12) 7 TW * N 1 . 1* f**. 1:;[711V]* AR':'JREEMENT 1., 626. 00 1.. 420'%',:1.01/26/99 901.'. 0 0 MIDWEST SALE 7 Ej CC)HAND SCIPIP 121.915 1.21.95 420"::*0'2 01/26/99 9,*.!,:L'3*00 IVAI ... SH, WAIJ....-IAM P.COMM. PLB6. INE3P.244.00 CGOIM. Fl .... fici. INSFO.00 00---244.00 420',','.',01./26/99 940500 W[71* INC.1.EXTINGUTSHER CI KS 2.75 2.75 42054 01/26/99 941480 W14113LE'R., M.'I'('*'IiAl:-.L-EMT 3'1..::;0 71 . 30 01./26*/99 970 YOCLIM OIL CO.I)I*EE-;[71.. 1 L x; 5 0 1. 0 TOTAL 79922.-- 07 LIC:HFiE2 CITY CIF MAPL EWOOD PARE I. 29/99 14:43 VOUCHER /CpHE COK REG"I TER FOR PERIOD 1.4 - - - -- - LICHE-R/ E::CK __.-CHECK.VENDOR _ _VENDCIft ITEM _ _ - -- ... - -- -ITEM.- _ .CHECK Mf3ER DATE NUKDER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 7781-01./2 /_99- _._. -__090600..- .--BRODIN- STLIDIDS 9 . INC. ---------- - - - -PL.AQUE.- -SiTAF`NE -_ -- -___ -_ _.. ----------- -.___.100.00 -_ -_100.00 - 7782 01/25/99 890900 U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS PAY PHONES 184.54 PAY - PHONES _ - -- - -- -- - -- - - -- - -fi:i . 75 -- --2 `:;0 .::9- 7%83 01 /2x/99 1390905 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS TN LNF'HONE 77.86 77.86 7784 01/25/99 5501.50 MN BENE=FIT ASSOCIATION A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 141.76 141.76 778 __.01/:_'x/99 - - -- -_-943500..---WISCONSIN DEFT. -OF REVENUE - -- -WISCONSIN SWT- •JAN_99.--_ _ --790.91_90,.95- 7786 01/21/99 343.706 HERITAGE RANI'US SAVINGS BONDS 100.00 500.00 7787 01/25/99 561050 MINNESOTA UC FUND UNE?M:LOYM(:NT COMP INS--4TH QTR 6138.24 6£18.24 77E38 _01./26/99.722200 -----F'.E.k.A._ . _ ._. - ------- ____ -- _ - -. _PE-RA DE:I) PAY-- KOPPr:,N____-- --. - _ - PERA CONTRIBUTION -KOPPE N 16.E 33.06 7789__ - _01/26/_99.__ - -.722200.P.E.R.A.- ____- _---- .-- - - - - -_ _ -- -------PEf,A- DEDUCTION PAYABLE_8- PERA CONTRIBUTIONS 19, 594.41 34 7751 '001/26/99----01350 -- .11fi.0 {ANak:::[, ..1 {OLJ_Y -- __ -- - -_BETTY_ t: ASH F7f-:F'iXNISi.4MENT---- . - - - - --9.00 -- PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 21.30 PETTY CASH REPL.E.NISHME =NT 7.32 PETTY CASI•{ RE:PL..EN I SHMENT 1.37 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 6.95 PETTY CASH REPLENISiHMENI'3.4-4 NT -.PET TY_._CAS1••1._ REF'l.f NISHME: -.10.12._ PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 10.4: PETTY CASH RE PL ENI ISHMENT 4.24 PETTY CASt I_kE:F'LF..N I SHME=..NT - - -- PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 3.56 PETTY CASH REPLJ_IISiHMENI'51 PETTY REPLE NIISHME=NT 11.11CASH PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 3.50 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 7.54 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT - -- --15.96 - - - - - -- PETTY CASH hl= F'LI:N:[:3f•IMENT -- -- --9.5 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 4.32 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 9.90 PETTY CASH REPL- ENISHMENT 6.58 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 1.50 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 14. E64 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 14.70 PETTY CASH REPL.EN I. Di tENT 4.26 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT 7.48 PETTY CASH RE PLFN 3: S;HME:NT 10.50 PE T TY CASH REPL E.NI SHME -NT 12.99 215.40 7791 01/27/99 531.660 ME.TkC POLITAN COLINCIL.DECE MBE *R SAC is-1 E3E)0.0O 159860.00 UCHRE-CITY OF MA1='L.EWOOD PAGE 2 29/99 i - : 4 VCILIC "HER /C:HEC K R FOR PER tOD 14 Ll(:HER/ ECk * _ ... _. _CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM. -. _.. _ITEM --CHECK.--- MBER DINE NUMBER NAME DES(:RXP AMOUNT AMOUNT 7792 ._.01/27/99 5414 -40 MINN. STATE TREASUR STAX _DEMEMBER SURTAX 7793 01/28/99 550150 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 17.78 17.78 7794 01/9/99 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSE"S DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 1,14 .00 1,14 .00 7795 01/29/99 151340 COMPTON, DE:NNIS _ _ _ _ -- ___._ -- __ _ ___. -....FIRE OFFICER 2,106.00 -- _ -- ^^2,106. -00- 7796 01/29/99 110460 CAREFREE COTTAGES OF MPL.1+ D TIF - PHASE I 259611.19 TIF - PHASE. II TIF - PHASE III 60 106,619.63 7797.01/29/99 630018 N(:F'rr,S GROUP l_:CFF INS _ -.- - --LIFE IN3UkANC1 =., i='AYABLE - - - - - -- -- - -_ - --55.00.- A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 6.00 261.00 TOTAL_ CHECKS 16.4 , 688.93 0 UCHRE-72 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 1/29/99 11:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR IUCHER/ 4ECK_._CHECK*____.VENDOR VENDUR.--ITEM CHE JMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 42039.--02/02/99.--.------.--.-.--HE-AL71i,PAF4TNE:'RS.--REFUND--AMB.-980IE3696/9EI03.9929 926.64 926. -64- 42040 02/02/99 BRUCE ANDERSON REFUND TICKETS 29.82 29.82 42041 02J02/99 SHELIA HOUIM REFUND-TICKETS 14.91 14.91 42042--02/02/97-SHIRLEY KERN------ ----.---DAMAGE-DEF-*-.-DN-ROOM-rEKTAL 250.00-25Q, 00 42043 02/02/99 TOM HART REFUND BASKETBALL 55.00 515. 00 42044 02/02/99 CINDY YOUKOVICH REFUND BASKT-_TBALL 50.00 50.00 42045 02/02/99 MARK EXME PAR'rIAL. REFUND-NO VB REF I GME 18.00 JR&OL 42046 02/02/99 ROSELLA EDQUIST REFUND PATIENT-PD F20320 299.10 299.10 42047 02/02/99 ANN HUTZ REFUND PATIENT PD F20736 71.66 71.66 42048 -02/02/99--010300 _____AJ FORLITI PHOTOGRAP Y_H 0R rPT <AITS 42049 02J02/99 010467 AT & T TEJ_EPHONE 125.131 TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 87.9? TELEPHONE 21.98 TELEPHONE 54.04- TELEPHONE 190. 18 TELEPHONE 11.34 515.26 42050 02/02/99 01057 5 ACE HARDWARE BRASS FITTINGS 19.53 BRASS FITTINGS, POLY TUBING 7.19 26.72 42051 02/02/99 020405 AIRrAS NORTH CENTRAL MEDICAL OXYGEN 58.49 58.49 42052 02/02/99 020411.AIRTOLICH CELL.ULAR BELLEVUE ----CELL- PHONE:-__33,67. CELL- P1 TONE 16.78 50.45 42053..-02/02/.99--020025.ALEXANDRIA FIRE DEPARTMENT TRAVEi_ & TRAINING 405.00 42054 02/02/99 020870 ALLIED MEDICAL ACCTS CONTROL CN)MMISSIONS-COLLECTION AGENCY 317.42 317.42 42055 02/02/99 030310 ANCOM COMMUN I CAT I DNS' INC.RADIO REPAIR 60.00 60.00 42056.02/02/99 050550 AUBIN DENNY FO0D_FOR_STAT.ION -.MEETING.--32.81 42057 02/02/99,061906 BALIER BUILT SUPPLIES VEHICLE 556.95 REPAIR &.MAIN*T*/VEHICLE 65.57 622.52 42058 02/02/99 080925 OARD OF WATE7R COMM 11.31.31 ONERS 1177 16.83 2501 42059 02/02/99 081230 BOYER TRUCK PARTS SWITCH.,49.42 D7 OCITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 229/99 11:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER OUCHE.R/ HEClr._._CHECK__.___VENDOR -.-VENDOR ITEM ----CHECt_4UMBER'DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT CLUTCH__ASSY.00.02-9-44 42060 02/02/99 110160 CWH RESEARCH, INC.98 POLICE OFFICER TESTING 885. 00 88`x.00 42061 02/02/99 1104510 CARROT-TOP INDUSTRIES, INC.FLAG 173.00 173.00 42062-02/02/-`-99---.151200-CDMMONW-.ALTfi ELECTOF-.-.MNo-INC.---REI.AW---IIOCIr:EY-RINK-LIGHTS 1,071.9 1 42063 02/02/99 151350 COMPUCARD INC.BLACK RIBBONS, CLEANING CARDS 1=5.72 1 x.72 42064 02/02/99 161135 CRAWFORD DOOR SALES OF THE TWI REPAIR DOOR AT STATION 4 115.95 115.95 42065 02/02/99 170200 GLIB FOODS-MAPLEWOOD EAST HOT DOG BUNS;9.20 9.20 42066 02/02/99 100230 DLT SOLUTIONS, INC.AUTOCAD UP13'RADE 395.00 395.00 42067 02/02/99 181852 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE KEYS 10.46 10.46 9A2068--02/0249 210175---DOHERTY.KATHY -MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 3 MI 3 64 3.64 42069 02/02/99 233.500 EDDY BROTHERS COMPANY, LLC HELMET PARTS 416.90 416.90 42070 02/02/99 231525 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.YEAR 2000 MODS /SOFTWARE 1 1 42071 02/02/99 240375 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.REPAIR 7*0 R-3 330.70 3 42072 02/02/99 260648 1ST LINE BEVERAGE MDSE. FOR RESALE 142.50 1.42.50 42073 02/02/99 3005100 G S. K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 11.20 UNIFORMS & __ CLOTHING 28.00 SUPPLIES JANITORIAL 43.59 UNIFORMS R. CLOTHING 5.19 FOR _'_ SERVICE 49.60 SUPPLIES JANITORIAL.14.91 UNIFORMS F. CLOTHING 76.88 UNIFORMS -&-CLOTHING 38.71 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 25.07 298.34 42 02/02/3-00550 GE CAPITAL KODAK, COPIER LEASE PMT JAN99 35.2 KODAK. COPIER LEASE PMT JAN99 35.29 KODAK COPIER LEASE PMT JAN99 1.26 COPIER LEASE PMT JAN99 45.59 K'ODAK COPIER LEASE PMT JAN99 94.99 t*%*ODAt*.* COPIER I-EASE PMT JAN99 84.23 KODAK COPIER LEASE PMT JAN99 20.13 KODAK COPIER LEASE PMT JAN99 38.83 KODAK COPIER LEASE PKr JAN99 94.42 KODAK COPIER LEASE PMT JAN99 70.29 528. 32 42075 02/02/99 3W1070 GALL'S, INC.SUFlPLIES - EQUIPMENT 81 381 .84 IC*ms2 29/99 11"18 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER mLLpsnzoom-_ PAGE 3 JC*cm/ 02/02/99 omwrzx o*opps awrs u ooasn auppLzso oaa'ow 288.24 VENI)CJR.--VENI)OR*''--.-'__'z' mmooczArzow ITEM msR zmrs wumasm ww°E mzacmzprzow wmouwr wwouwr SUPPLIES 12077 02/02/99 301680 GEORGE MAURER GROUP CONCERT PMT.2 2,5OO,OO 4207EI 02/02/99 320240 GRACE DUANE COMMERCIAL BLDG INSPECTIONS COMMERCIAL BL INSPECTIONS 169'46 16 12079 02/02/99 320265 omwrzx o*opps awrs u ooasn auppLzso oaa'ow 288.24 mmooczArzow 12081 02/02/99 3701-00 HUTc*zwoow, www PROGRAM SUPPLIES 73 SUPPLIES punr*mE 35'*9 s*zcLs ALLowwwcs 38.30 169'46 12082 02/02/99 380820 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS COPIER LEASE 80%1211*210 . 9 1 COPIER LEASE 20%515 . 23 12083 02/02/99 410260 KAMCOM TECHNOLOGIES PENT zz COMPUTER/NOBILzm MONIr 1 zm m084 02/02^99 410310 Kwnzo, FLINT rnwvsL m rnxzwzwo 19.70 19.70 ma ouwuvp 410370 Kwr* comp*wzea rusL u OIL 17.16 zwvswron, OF oUPpLzso 7.69 INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES 83.07 INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES 58.79 s 42086 vo,oc^pp 420150 zwwo'a cuaromsn ADM asnvzcsa pAI"sn currzwo r^ps 7.97 860.7B ou,LIcwrzwo cuy,m 15.31 oun-zcwrzwe comra 31.95 oz ------ 400'oupLzcwrzwo coorm 12087 02^02/99_4 *v11o_.KRIzuznzrzz_n 284.52---284.52 ooaa 02^02^99 40013.5o LTD. commoozrzso pnoonwm osconxrzowo 39'20 39.20 42089 460000 -uE.vco° INC. -''-' -- 'MELT ----------------------- 2090 o2/uu/pp 470700 LzLLzs nuamaAw wsuopmsna _puaLzc worzcso 38.27___.._ puaLzc worzcso 994'32 smpuo,mswr oo 199'00 1 42091 02/02/99 511175 MARDI ASSOCIATES AD IN WEDDING GUIDE 125.00 1 . 25.00 UCHRE .2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE' . 4 L/29/99 11:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS .-__....____ 311CHER/ lECK%*____._CHECK-----VENDOR VENDOR.,-ITEM-.--. JMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 42092_02/02/99 520w500,___MCGUIREq.CAR_ALLOWANCE__=_f_FJ 450.00 450_.99 42093 02/02/99 530560 MERIT CHEVROLET MODULE 30.E 30.53 42094 02/02/99 530730 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY BALANCE OWING-INV 32200/32392 9.04 1 PR VOLLEYBALL STANDARDS 1,405.38 COUNTERS 173.1 42095 02/02/99 530755 METROCALL PAGER 10.46 10.46 42096 02/02/99 540175 MIDWEST COCA--COLA BOTTLING CO.MDSE. FOR REcj*AL.E 539.e5 53 . 85 2097 02/02/99 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO FILM DEVELOPING 11.97 FILM DEVELOPING 6.66 18.63 42098 02/02/99 550100 MN/S.C.I.A.YEARLY DUES 18.00 18.00 42099 02/02/99 630910 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE EMPLOYMENT AD 284.15 284.15 42106 02/02/99 640815 NEWPROS DATA INC.PUBLISHING 39.00 39.00 421.01_02/024?5 660800___NORTH. ST, PAUL CITY.. OF _1902.568. 00 UTILITIES 178.05 UTILITIES 223.87 UTILITIES 2100 218.29 2 42102 02/02/99 661755 NORTHERN STATES POWER 2'301 1 2516. 2701 7.76 2725 152.58 1830 8.904.38 10.330.88 42103 02/02/99 6617135 NORTHWEST CHAPTER F-8INAA SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 60.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 60.00 120.00 42104 02/02/99 670950 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC MAPLEWOOD IN MOTION 2,021.40 2,021.40 42105 02/02/99 690340 OLSON ARNOLD G MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 150 MI.42.00 42.00 A2106...02/02/99 691160_--ON SITE. SANITATION FEES FOR SERVICE-----_-43.73--. FEES FOR SERVICE 43.73 87.46 4210702/02/99..700735 PALMA I STEVEN T..PROGRAM SUPPLIES-35.00. MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 11.60 46.60 42100 02/02/99 7001300 PAPER WAREHOUSE, INC.X-:(ANQtJE7*.,.ROOM '.31Jl::4PLIES_ ___ _ 42109 02/02/99 701.4-00 PARTY TIME LIQUOR ROOTBE'ER CUPS 12.72 12.72 42110 02/02/99 720768 PREMIER BANK SAFE DEP. BOX REN*rAL 60.00 60.00 oj) m'*nE2 oz/ou/vv 750550 nszw*wmr zwsrzrurzowwL Foono moas. FOR nsawLs 437. 23,5 437.35 pAes mCITYOFMAPLEWOOD mcp/pp 11"18 vouc*Em/c*scK nsmzarsm 42116 02/0:/99 771662 pzuLAn, mzc*msL aooKo 45.95 Fon ALL 42117 02/02/99 mCosn4 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.SUPPLIES - OFFICE 21.68 VENDOR_VENDOR . - _---_zrsm --- CHECK JEn rArs wumasn wwms zEoonzprzow wwouwr 4-21u_02/02/99_-740560,_m.L.a.-SPORTSWEAR-INC SUPPLIES - OFFICE 20.137 UN -u u, SUPPLIES - OFFICE 10.10 uwzrommm u cLorxzwo 1 4 4u1ca _oaxoupv- __aoo __-mwzwaow r000a -_ . _ TROLLS _coFsss _uzmz mz_______-o SUPPLIES OFFICE 98.20 S 9 ~' U cALcuu^rom 11.12 pmomnAma auppLzEa FOR won*S*op 43.72 125_69 42113 02/02/99 741600 nwmesY couwrY POST VERIFICATON uAmoa 73.20 LAMPING SERVICE 92.74 LAMPING SERVICE 131 - 6 a LAMPING SERVICE FOR TRAFFIC SI 39.03 42114 oz/ou/vv 750550 nszw*wmr zwsrzrurzowwL Foono moas. FOR nsawLs 437. 23,5 437.35 4rzun--o2/ouxna___7a1row__-mowomJNwsm___-______'_-_ 42116 02/0:/99 771662 pzuLAn, mzc*msL aooKo 45.95 45'95 42117 02/02/99 780300 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.SUPPLIES - OFFICE 21.68 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 12.96 SIJPPLIES_ -_OFFICE 131.03 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 20.137 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 10.10 ENVELOPES. FILM I Pl:NQ_TLjj 112.08 SUPPLIES OFFICE 98.20 cALcuu^rom 11.12 ouPpLzso.OFFICE cnsorr FOR nsrumwsn auppLzsa 136.77- cnsmzT 12.96-405.08 42118 02/02/99 7130450 SAFE ASSURE CONSULTANTS SAFET z NG-P/W EMPLOYEES 276.75 awpsr rnAzwzwe-p/w smpLo,sso 476'63 oArsrrnwzNzwo-pwx.smpLo ______3o7,mo_______________ eAFsr rnwzwzwo-p/w smpLo,ssm 307.50 owFsr rnwzwzwo-p/w smpLo,sca 169'12 1,537.50 42119 02/02/99 7130600 SAM'S CLUB 'DIRECT -'POP---------------------3.99 cvzpa 68.80 42120 02^02v99 780733 owvAawcu, ars*s swo. Lzc.20.00 20.00 42121 02/02/99 000^ow asysnoow, owvzo -oUl"pLzsa/a'ATzoN 162.09 42122 02/02J99 820460 aL^aw, XAcLss poarsna . _90. 00--_ _-_-_--_p«.um_. 42123 02m2/99 1340405 or' PAUL, czn OF TUITION 395'00 395. 00 423.24 02/02/99 84533,1.orzsm, mwn,mzLswes mczmounosmEwr''- -c8.6 --'----37.8.36- 1/29/99 11:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL HECK.-_K_._____-__'__--..'____z x asn zArs wumasn wwms socmzprzow wmouwr wmouwr arnszc*sn'a.__-__.___-____SUPPLIES - CHEMICAL IRRITANT SPRAY 63.63 114.43 auwmwr a-r-a 42127 wu/ou/rp 850750 mwwwaow, LvuE uwzFoRma u cLor*zwo 30.00 30.00 4212B 02/02/99 86061.50 TARGET STORES-CSA A/R CLOCK 3.2.77 POP 25.50 38.27 42129 oa/wo/vp 880503.rnswoww, amAp*zca wxms rswT w728 2.74 42,74 42130 uwL.zmzrso 42151 o2/wu^9v 900100 uwzronwo uwLzmzrso UNIFORMS & cLon+zwo 216.22 CLOTH 408,28 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 26.95 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 110.61 UNIFORMS & CLOTHI NO 8.91 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 76.50 UNIFORMS. & -.,CLOTHING 42,52 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 184.53 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 238.36- UNIFORMS & CLOTHINQ_17 CORE.DIT 217.80- UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 196.02 CLOTHz UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 856.62 uwzFonmo u cLor*zwo 234.64 UN --CLOTHING uwzroRmo u cLor*zwo 95.31 uwzronma u CLOTHING 42.52 UNIFORMS .zw uw u cLor*zwo 134.83 UNIFORMS u cLor*zwo 83.61 uwzpomma m_cLprnzwm 95,31____.__________ uwz u cLor*zwo 125.19 uwzronmo u cLor*zwo 89.77 UNIFORMS _m -CLOTH zwm________-_---_-- BADGES 865.05 uwzronma u oLor*zwo 95.31 aAneE REPAIR 37.28 UNIFORMS u cmTHzNG _ -------94.36 4 42132 oovou/pp 9001.75 U.S. poarmL asnuzcs poarwoE JL,000'00 ____1,9*0,00 42153 ou/ou,pp 901300 UPPER mzowssr SA co.msPLzsa - JAmzronzm-499'87 auppLzsa - JANITORIAL_ ..423.27-923.14 42134 02/02/99 9105100 VASKo RUBBISH REMOVAL FEES FOR oERvzcs 242'35 OUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPL.EWOOD PA 7 1/29/99 11:18 VOUCHER /(:HECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS...__.- OUCHE_R/ HECK - -- -CHECK:-VENDOR VENDOR ITEM - - - -- - - - -- _ _...... --ITEM. - -CHECK UMBER DINE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT FOR SERVICE_ --33 FEES FOR SERVICE 561.34 1 4213j _02/02/99._____911300_.VIKING AUTOMATIC SF *RINI;LER CO.. -_ SPRINF*t.E:R...SYSTE M..INSP. ____ -__ -.66.00 42136 02/02/99 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P.COMM. FLBG. INSP.48.00 COMM. _. PLBG. -INSP.60.00 COMM. PLBG. INSP.60.00--48.00 42137___02/02/99__940480 _WFA'M( -.R WATCH • INC...PAGER /_ FAX ---- _ 42138 02/02/99 940500 WEBER- -TROSETH INC.SCUBA TANKS TESTED, 0 RINGS 53.00 53.00 42139 02/02/99 960450 XEROX CORPORATION DUPLICATING COST 12-2/12-3"1 35.32 DUPLICATING COSTS 12- 2/12 -31 88 DUPLICATING COSTS -12- 2/12• -1._82.27 DUPLICATING COSTS 12- 2/12 -31 37.08 DUPLICATING COSTS 12- 2/12--31 63.84 219.39 42140 02/02/99 970700 YOCUM AIL CO.FUEL 14.03 14.03 42141 --02/02/99 - - -980:500 -ZIE'GL.E.R INC. -- - -- -_ -- -----SENI )ER,_.VASKET__24.38_24.3B_ I TOTAL_ CHICKS B_4_.4(30 . t3 CITY C8 MAPiJEWOOD EMpLOYEE GROSS [\RNIN8S REFORT FOR THE C( PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 ICKES,SHERI 1132.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 BECKER,RONALD D 2259.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 BERGE*RON,JOSEPH A 2446.03 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 GHERRY 330.65 DIRECT DEPOSIT . DIRECT DEPOSIT ^ 01/22/99 ANDERSON,[AR[}iE J 15)O 62 DIRECT DEPOSIT L 01/22/99 DEHN DEl(]RAH 1440.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 CARLE,JEANETTE E 1383.18 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 JAGOE,CAROL 1344.46 DIRECT DEPOSIT _01/22/99 OL.SON,SANlRA 819.76 DIRECT DEPOSIT 0:1. /22/99 ALDRIDGE,MARK 2047^12 DIRECT DEPOSIT ' 01/22/99 BOHL 908.16 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 FLOR,TIMOTHY 2250.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 KVAM,DAVID 1892.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT ' 01/22/99 EVERSON,PAUL 1479.37 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 FRASER,JO>N 1 95 3.12DIRECTDEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT O1/22/99 OSWALD,ERICK D 1991,22 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 DUCHARME,JO1o(N 1626,52 DIRECT DEPOSIT _01/22/99 PECK L 1769.72 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/qp GREW—HAyMAN,JANET M 836^62 DIRECT DEPOSIT — 01/22/99 EKSTRAND,T/OMAS G 1781.72 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 ROBERTS,KENNETH 1813.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 TAUBMAN,DOUGi'AS J 1999 . 85 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 EDGE DOUGi '' AS 2039 12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 LIVINGSTON,JOYCE L 788^71 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 KNAi|SS,PETER 776^92 CITY OF EMPLDYEE GROSSEARNINGS REPORT CHE/MR[0 T. DIRECT DEPOSIT O1/22./99 PALMA,STEVEN 1848.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 0:1. /2'2 JOHNSON ,KEVIN 1954^08 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 WARMAN,RODIN 935^40 DIRECT DEPOSIT O1/22/99 JENGEN,MATTHEW 740.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 ERICKSON,VIRGINIA A 1910.52 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 ROGSBACH,GEORGE 375.73 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01' /22/99 LUTZ,DAVID P 2084.87 DIRECT DEPOSIT 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 SCHiINGMAN,PAUi 1718.62 DIRECT DEPOSIT '01/22/99 FARR,D]'ANE M 292.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 V0WERK ROBERT E 2388 63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 NAGEL,BRYAN 21El- DIRECT DEPOSIT Y O1/22/9p HELUE,KERRy 1697^72 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1748^92 DIRECT DEPOSIT '0:1. /22/99 OSTER ANDREA J 1420^92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 8 01/22/99 ANDREWS ,SCOTT A 2182.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 RUNNING,ROBERT 1901.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 7 01/22/99 SAVAGEAi>,STEPHEN D 1214.85 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIDECTDE9O8lT -01/22/99 BARTEi DEN ISE 40.50 DIRECT 01/22/99 CARi'SON,DALE 330.65 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 MARTINSON,CAROL F 1733.73 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01. /22/qq HIEBERT,STEVEN 1858^34 DIRECT DEPOSIT O1/22/99 DUNN,AL[CE 1 971.65 DIRECT DEPOSIT ' 01/22/99 CORNER ,ANY L 127.75 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 STEV[NS,MARY CATH|]KINE 36.40 DIRECT DEPOSIT - 01/22/99 HORSNELL,Jl0ITH A 797.66 DIRECT DEPOSIT CITY OF EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE Cl]RRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE 1:-.. NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 SEEGER,GERALD F 272.26 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 MOREHEAD,JESSICA R 254.30 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 STILL,VERNI)N T 1899^32 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 COLEMAN,PHILIP 486.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT ` 01/22/99 CHRISTENSEN,CHARiES M 1054.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 1 01/22/99 BELDE,STANLfY 1883.25 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 ATKINS,KATHERINE 835.55 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 FRY,PATRI CIA 1404.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT ' 01/22/99 RENSLOW,RITA 239.06 DIRECT DEPOSIT ' DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 BAKKE iONN Ao.1927.99 DIRECT DEPOSIT x 01/22/99 BOWMAN,RICK A 21O8.84 DIRECT DEPOSIT 0:1. /22/99 KOppEN,MARVIN 330.65 Z 01/22/99 CHRISTENSEN,JODIE D 677.59 DIRECT DEPOSIT —O1/22/99 KITTRIDGE,KEVIN L 330.65 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 WASH,MATTHEW G 137.35 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 PIKE,GARY K 1260.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT r 01/22/99 HEINZ,STEPHEN J 1899.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 NELSON,JEAN 861.69 DIRECT DEPO8lT DIRECT DEPOSIT '01/22/99 KELLY LISA 0963 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 HEMQUIST,MICHAEL R 2157.O0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 TETZLAFF A 510^26 DIRECT DEPOSIT Y 01/22/99 GOPLEN NICOi AS P 13.7O DIRECT DEPOSIT - 01/22/99 URBANSKI S 1293.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT ' 01/22/99 IEG,SUSAN Cz .1360.58 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 BAUMAN,GAYLE L 1881.74 DIRECT DEPOSIT CITY OF EMF1-OYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT CHECK NUMBER C DA 0_ M ___AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 SMITH,CASSANDRA L 1290 06 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 8KRYPEK,Jl}SHUA L 586 . 63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 HERBERT J 2096^97 IREC3DIPC]I 01/22/9p STAFNE,GREGORy L 1805^49 DIRECT IEpOSII 01/22/q9 STOCKTON,DERRELL *T'1l99^32 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 MELANDER,JON A 2212 19 DIRECT DE9OSl 01/22/99 ROSSMAN,DAVID A 1.705-:1.9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 MEYER,GERALD W 1853.55 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 THOMAS-J'R,STEVEN 21O4.59 lITDI»(]8lT ^ 01/22/99 PRIEBE,WILLIAM 1705 72 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSJT 01/22/99 DOHERTY KATHi EEN M 1420 92 DIRECTIED1T |01/22/9p GCHINDELDE]KER,JAMES 1460^92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 RADBETT,KEVIN 3211 ' ^ 12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 GRAF,MICfAEL 31083 ^ 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT \01/22/q9 DIRKSWAGER,COLLEEN 1499^67 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 CARLSDN,THERESE 1' 595 26 ICI39O8II 2724-1195 01/22/99 LE,SHERYL DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 FAUST,DANIEL F 3178.74 DIRECT DEPOSIT ^ DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 HANGSLEBEN,RICHARD 1940.52 DIRECT 01/22/99 KEL SE Y,CONNIE L'1429 78 DIRECT 01/22/99 GUIL.FOILE,KAREM E 1799^62 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 POWE:-'L-L-,, P}ILIp DECTDE9O8lT 0 1/22/9 WINGER,DONALD S 3010 77 DIRECT DEPOSIT O1/22/99 BANICK,JOHN J 2 _ DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 VAR 1: S,FLINT D 25 95 4 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT CITY OF EMF1-OYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT Fl]R THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK N1JMBER CHECK DATE ENPL1]YEE NAME DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 STEFFEN,SCOTT L DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 THOMALLA,DAVID J DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 YOUNGREN,JAMES DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 HAIDER,KENNETH G DIRECT DEPOSIT ' 01/22/99 PRIEFER,WILLIAM DIRECT DEPOSIT . 01/22/99 KANE,MICHAEL R DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 LUNDSTEN,LANCE DIRECT DEPOSIT - 01/22/99 CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 ANDERSON,BRUCE DIRECT DEPOSIT ' 01/22/99 MARUSKA,MARK A DIRECT DEPOSIT l IRBCTDEPOQIT "01/22/99 HUTCHINSON ANN E DIRECT DEPOSIT _O1/22/99 COLEMAN,MELINDA DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 CROSSON,LINDA DIRECT DEPOSIT -01/22/99 EASTMAN, THOMAS E DIRECT DEPOSIT J 01/22/99 STAPLES,PAi/LINE DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 HURLEY,STEPHEN DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 GERVA]S—JR , CLARENCE N DIRECT DEPOSIT ` DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/2299 HAiWEG KEVIN R DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/22/99 OTIS,MARY ELLEN M DIRECT DEPOSIT -01/22/99 CASAREZ,GINA 70064 1/22/;/9 ER]CSON , MICHAEi' A 70065 01/22/99 McGUIRE,MICHAEL A 70 066 01/22/99 ZICK,LINDA 70067 O1/22/99 WHITE,BARRY T 70068 01/22/99 CUDE,LARRY J AMOUNT 234(.38 2346.74 22 39.05 31(X5.20 1714.62 2018.30 2177.01 2178.62 2745.70 2018.30 1675.4-2 2756.20 2008.09 2261.88 2066.59 1624.11 2361.08 505.26 1228.12 2139.23 3953.17 241.50 77.50 369.15 CITY OF 14Af1JEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE NAME AMOUNT 70069 01/22/99 DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J 229.89 70070 01/22/99 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 448 00 70071 01/22/99 JACKS0N,MARY L 1132 .12 70072 01/22/99 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 1536.76 70073 01/22/99 IN. IVEN,AMY S 176 38 70074 01/22/99 JOHNSON,D(}NNIE '780 19 70075 01/22/99 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1381.23 70076 01/22/99 HENRY, JOHN 180.75 70077 01/22/99 PALANK,MARY KAY 1721.76 70078 01/22/99 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1715 77 70079 01/22/99 RYAN,MICHAEL 2720.02 7008O 01/22/99 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1632.44 7O081 01/22/99 BARTZ,PAUL 1684.28 70082 01/22/99 KDNG,TOMMY T 709 86 70083 01/22/99 MACFAR1'ANE,MELVIN R 1415.60 700B4 01/22/99 SORTREED,MICHAEL P 1772 80 70085 01/22/99 ZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 2019.75 70086 O1/22/99 WATCZAK,LA\]RA 1823.32 70087 01/22/99 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 1943.32 700 88 01/22/99 lALE,T]MAS M 1469 87 70089 01/22/99 MEEHANvJAMES 2096 19 70090 01/22/99 THIENES,PAUL 1872.12 70091 01/22/99 ACOSTA J 828.00 70092 01/22/99 ADRIAN W 120.00 70093 01/22/99 ANDERSON,B OBBIE J 816.00 CITY OF MAPiJF . WC]D EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT CHE[](NUMBER. 70094 7(X>95 70096 70097 70098 70099 70100 70101 70102 70103 70104 7(1(X5 70106 70107 70108 70109 70110 70111 70112 70113 70114 70115 70116 70117 70118 CHECK DATE 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 O1/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 EMPLOYEE NAME AD)ERSON,PHILIP A LAIRD AUBIN,DENNIS J BALAZS,JTXSEPH M BARTEL,BRENDA K BERGERUN,GAIL E BERGERDN,JOSEPH A BOE,ERICK W BOLLES,Tf1DMAS A BOiHRQUIN,RON G BOWMAN,RICK A BRAA7lN,HAR[U-D A BUCHE,JIM.TTE CAHIl'L,CHRISTOPHER S CORCORAN,JENNIFER L CROMETT,MARK F D/&'Y,FRANK DIETZ,EDWARD W DITTEL,MICHAEL A DOREE,KURT A DOWNS K DUELLMAN,AMY L DUELLMAN,JOSEPH W DUELLMAN,KIRK T AMOUNT 672.00 804.0O 24 2.00 1248.00 1210.00 372.O0 . 492.00 84.(X) 264.00 _ 1594.00 850.00 240.00 1078.00 1656.00 1188.00 280.00 1164.00 6(X).00 _ 312.0( 145(.00 1417.(X) 1715.0( 792.0( 1124^00 _ CZ. 0iDo C2)- CITY OF EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REFR- FOB THE CURRENT PAY 1::1ERIOD NiB C EL M C.1 1. 1 NT 701.1.9 01/22/99 DeMARS,TIMOTHY ALBERT 672.66 70120 01/22/99 EKSTRAND,HOWARD R 1116.00 70121 01/22/99 EVESON,PAUL E 2041100 70122 01/22/99 FETTERS,JEFFREY L 2088.00 70123 '01/22/99 FITZGERAiI),EDWARD P 622.00 70124 01/22/99 FLATTEN,DAVID J 1188.00 70125 01/22/99 GE}ARD,JAMIE P 2868.00 70126 01/22/99 N 2 - ;.500.00 70127 01/22/99 GRIUL F ZoL 984.00 70128 01/22/99 HALE,THDMAS M 850.00 70129 01/22/99 HALWEG,KEVIN R 2072.00 70130 01/22/99 HAMLIN,ANDREW G 528.00 70131 01/22/99 HAYES,JODI L 1032.00 70132 01/22/99 PATRICK E 2233.00 70133 01/22/99 HELLER,GERARD F 1914.00 70134 01/22/99 HERU]ND,RICK R 1385.00 70135 01/22/99 HOHN,JAMES M 535.00 70136 O1/22/99 JOHNSON,ANDREA D B02.00 70137 01/22/99 JOHNSON,DOi}GLAS R 1162~00 70138 01/22/99 J\JNGMANN,DAVID J 1210.00 70139 01/22/99 ISSACK,THOMAS 121100 70140 01/22/99 KNABE,WILLIAM H 1194.00 70141 01/22/99 KOLASA A 1248.00 70142 01/22/99 KDNDER,RONALD W 2612.00 70143 01/22/99 KORTUS,WILLIAM J 1400.00 C2)- CITY OF EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER NAME AMOONT 70144 01/22/99 LEDMAN,KEVIN 1618.00 70145 01/22/99 LEWSADER,PAUL J 540.00 70146 01/22/99 LIDBERG,MICHAB- A 946.00 70147 01/22/99 LINN,BRYAN D 616.00 70148 01/22/99 LUKIN,STEVEN J 2210.00 70149 01/22/99 MALLORY,GORDDN E 1097.00 70150 01/22/99 MARTY,MARK K 1920.00 70151 01/22/99 MASON W 24.00 70152 01/22/99 MELANDER 1602.00 70153 01/22/99 MELANDER,GCOTT A 1538.00 70154 01/22/99 MEYERS,PAiU_ E 1246.00 7015 'O1/22/99 MICKELSON,DEBRA J 708.00 70156 01/22/99 MILLER,NICH[8'AS J 1260.00 70157 01/22/99 MONK J 778.00 70158 01/22/99 MONROY,Jm4 J 2685.00 70159 01/22/99 McGOVERN,JOHN L 1160.00 70160 01/22/99 NADEAU,AAR[[N 654.00 70161 01/22/99 NA1'IPINSKI,STEPHEN M 966.00 70162 O1/22/99 NOLAN,PAiJI' W 768.00 70:1.6';*.-';O1 /22/99 NOVAK , JER(]ME R 9:1.2, 00 70164 01/22/99 OLSON,KENNETH A 672.00 70165 01/22/99 PETERSON,MARK S 1016.00 70166 01/22/99 PETE}SON,RICHARD A 600.00 70167 01/22/99 PETERSON,ROBERT H 1990^00 7 0168 01/22/99 PETERSON,THEODORE E 1266.00 CITY OF EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT CHEI]( NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOY[[ NAME AMOiINT 7016p 01/22/99 PIERCE,SCOTT G 2607.00 70170 01/22/99 R 697.00 70171 01/22/99 RICKETSON,BRENT L 310.00 70172 01/22/99 RDNDEAU,WILLIAM R 634.00 70173 01/22/99 SCHADT,8FFREY A 1476.00 70174 01/22/99 GCHOENECKER,THOMAS R 768.O0 70 175 01/22/99 SCHi/LTZ,MARK W 420.00 70176 01/22/99 SCHULTZ,THOMAS E 528.00 70177 01/22/99 SEVERSON,DAVID A 1436.00 70178 01/22/99 SHANLEY,ROBERT J 886.00 70179 01/22/99 SIEDOW,ERIC R 444.00 70180 01/22/99 T 1270.00 7O181 01/22/99 SINGER,SC[[7T W 754.00 70182 01/22/99 SKOK,STEPHEN L 720 00 70183 01/22/99 SMITH,KEITH A 966.00 70184 01/22/99 SMITH,MICHAEL T 1126.00 ' 70185 01/22/99 SOBCZA K, KEVIN J 264.00 7O186 01/22/99 S0ENSON,HEIDI M 5154.00 70187 01/22/99 STANWAY,ROBERT A 372.00 70188 01/22/99 SVENDSEN,RON 300 00 7O189 01/22/99 SVENDSEN,RUSTIN L 1770.00 70190 01/22/99 TESSMER,TODD D 240.00 70191 01/22/99 TREPANIER,EUGEWE 1434 00 70192 01/22/99 TRONNES,JOHN E 6601100 70931 01/22/99 WALZ,JAMES G 792.00 CITY OF* EMPLIy/EE GROSS EARNINGS FP[0RT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOl) CHEC|{ NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPL0 EE NAME AMOUNT 70194 01/22/99 WATERS,JOSEPH D 1510.00 701 01/22/99 H 1822.00 70196 01/22/99 WHISLER,MICHAEL D 560.00 70197 01/22/99 WHITE,JOEL A 816.00 70198 01/22/99 WILSON,JASON M 756.00 70199 01/22/99 ZASTROW,GREBG P 475.00 70200 01/22/99 ZIMMERMANN HOHN,ANN K 1185.00 70201 01/22/99 FI-I P 1164.29 70202 01/22/99 HEWITT,JOEL A 2559.34 70203 01/22/99 CHL ,JUDY M 1473.72 70204 01/22/99 DARST,JAME13)1856.54 70205 01/22/99 L 1918.71 70206 01/22/99 ELIAS,JAMES G 1769.72 70207 O1/22/99 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 1674.52 70208 01/22/99 ANDERSON S 1727.92 70209 01/22/99 EDSON,DAVID B 2154.77 70210 01/22/99 HELEY,ROLAND B 1937.09 70211 01/22/99 HINNENKAMP 1699.62 70212 01/22/99 LAVAQUF,MICHAEL 1433.72 70213 01/22/99 LINDOR FT* ,DENNIS P 1460.92 70214 01/22/99 McCUSKER,El'IZABETH A MANNING 18.75 70215 01/22/99 SOUTTGR,CHRISTINE 701100 70216 01/22/99 THOMPSON,DEBRA J 404.21 70217 01/22/99 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 162 70218 01/22/99 ANDERSON,EVERETT 549.63 CITY OF EMPLOYEE GROSS E REpORT CHECK Ni0BER lECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME A MO U NT 70219 01/22/99 OLSON,ARNOLD G 530.00 70220 01/22/99 OSTROM,MAR JO RIE 2084.22 70221 01/22/99 WENGER,ROBERT J 1737 , /2 70222 01/22/99 ADAMS,TAMARA K 33 0O 70223 ,01722/99 BALLESTRAZ7E,THAD M 234.05 70224 01/22/99 BENDER,JAYME L 28 . 00 70225 01/22/99 BRANDSTROM,JULIET M 388.13 70226 01/22/99 BRANDSTROM,MARY c.*81 0O 70227 01/22/99 BRANDSTROM M.105.00 70228 01/22/99 BUCZKDWSKI,A]'AN 43 0O 70229 01/22/99 BURTON,JASON E 421100 70230 01/22/99 CHURCHILL,FRAN E 26 00 70231 01 /2 2/99 CLINTSMAN—JR,LEE M 33.00 70232 01/22/99 DANIEL8ON,GRANT A 50.00 70233 01/22/99 DEVRIES,LINDSAY 43.00 70234 01/22/99 DIEBEL,CHRISTOPHER J 20 00 7O235 01/22/99 DOTY,TRESSA M 52 25 70236 01/22/99 FINN,GREGORY S 1197 ^ 02 70237 01/22/99 FLUG,ELAINE R 91 25 70238 01/22/99 FLUG,MEGAN L 8 25 70239 01/22/99 FRANK,L}RA 24.$.0() 70240 01/22/99 GLAVAN,JOSEPH P 124.0O 70241 01/22/99 GRUBER,SARAH A 67.5O 70242 01/22/99 HARGROVE,AYAN T 21.00 70243 01/22/99 HARGROVE,BRYCE M 21.00 CITY OF EMPLlYEE GROS E A RNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHEC ML0MBER [1ECK DATE 70244 70245 70246 70247 70248 70249 70250 7A25 70?52 70253 70254 70255 70256 70257 70258 70259 70260 70261 70262 70263 70264 70265 70266 70267 70268 EMPLOYEE W-IME HARRIGAN J HARRIGAN,DAVID A HOFFMANN,STEl/EN M HORNER,MATTHEW R JANSEN,DAVID S JANSEN,MARK G JANSEN,MICHAEl' KAREL,JULIE E KLEM,JOSH H LEE,JACOB A LIN ti. ,TERI L MAFI,ROBERT'A MARTINl/CCI,SARA MATHEYS,TANYA RAE MILES,ADAM J McBRIDE,PATRICK D NELSON,JAYME K WIEMCZYK R NIEMCZYK,BRIAN N NK]RMAN,KENDALL A POLICONE,ANNE H PONSOLiJE,JOE L PREW,JOHN M ROGERG,MELISSA E RYDEEN,BENJAMIN D A MOX]NT 33.00 20.25 21.00 86.00 20.00 42.00 86.00 5(.25 18.75 117.00 40.50 43.00 27.00 44.0( 25.00 183.75 44.0( 18.75 36.00 44.00 01/22/99 O1/22/99 01/~22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/'22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 O1/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 45.50 22.0( 21.00 HECK NUMBER 70269 70270 70271. 70272 70'0: Z 7(%274 70275 70276 70277 70278 70279 70280 7(%281 70282 70283 70284 70285 70286 70287 70288 7(>289 70290 70291 70292 CHECK DATE 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 O1/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 O1/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 1/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 CITY OF EMPLOYEE GROGS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD EMPLOYEE NAME RYDEEN,SARAH LEE ANN C SANDHOLM,ANDR[3-4 J SIVERHUS,TIMOTHY SOMERS,GREG[RY B SFIE NCER, lot ILLIAM STIEN,MARY GTIEN,N/7HANIEL THILL,ERIN THOMAS,RUSSELL TOWNSEND,ELI A 7l]WNSEND,ISAAC P WARMAN,KATHRYN WEHLAGE,JAMES A WEHLAGE,JEFFREY A BREHEIM,ROGER W GERMAIN,DAVID NADEAU,EDWARD A NORDQUIST,RICHARD SCHULTZ,SCDTT M cc) ONS,MELISSA GLASS,JEAN HOIuM,SHEILA HORWATH,RONALD J MICHAi-SKI,ANDREW M AMOUNT 33.0( 147.00 74.25 75.00 159.25 33.00 1138.62 228.00 20.00 41.00 20.00 33.00 182.00 52.50 187.75 1795.20 1537.56 2010.62 1791.44 1180.66 773.21 718.50 842.17 547.30 130.00 C]]FY Of EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT 1-01:Z THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AiOUNT 70294 01/22/99 NEAMY,MARK W 156.40 70295 01/22/99 SCHMIDT,F0]SSELL 1119.42 70296 01/22/99 M 3 6 0 .B 5 70297 01/22/99 SHOBERG,CARY J 528.25 70298 01/22/99 ABR. A1-4 AME.Jl (.3N,.1.11 A N K 209.55 70299 01/22/99 REBECCA L.142.38 70 3 00 01/22/99 ANDERSON,Jl|LIE M 404.05 70301 01/22/99 BADEN,ALIGON L 245.91 70302 01/22/99 BADEN,MATHIAS 277.00 70303 01/22/99 BITTNER,KATIE C 242.19 70304 01/22/99 CHAPMAN,JENNY A 119.00 70305 01/22/99 CJ" ONLIN,PAMELA 40.50 70306 01/22/99 COOPER,JOSEFH W 224.25 70307 01/22/99 DAMROW,KELLY C 74.75 70308 01/22/99 DEMPSEY,BETH M 86.69 70309 01/22/99 ERICKSON,CAROL A 40.00 70310 01/22/99 FONTAINE,ANTHONY 74.75 70311 01/22/'99 FRETZ,S(*rRAH J 35.75 70312 01/22/99 GIRLING,JACQUELINE M 308.08 70313 01/22/99 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 127.75 70314 01/22/99 HAGSTROM,LINDSEY S 13.00 70315 01/22/99 HAWKE,RYAN A 157.12 70316 01/22/99 HAWKINS,LISA A 78.80 70317 01/22/99 HEDL(JND,LAUREL R 48.75 70318 01/22/99 HEIM"423.51 CIz CITY OF EMPLOY[] GROSS EARNINGS REF[T N10iBER DATE NAME 70319 01/22/99 HEINN,REBECCA L 70320 01/22/99 HOLMGREN,LEAH M 70321 01/22/99 HOULE,DE}/ISE L 70322 01/22/99 HUPPERT,ERIN M 70323 01/22/99 IKHAML,JO>0 70324 01/22/99 JOHNGON,ROBERT P 70325 O1/22/99 JOHNSON,ROLLAND H 70326 01/22/99 J{}HNSON,STETSON 70327 01/22/99 JOVONOVICH,TODD R 70328 01/22/99 KOEHNEN,AMY 7{)329 01/22/99 KOE]-INEN,MARY B 70330 01/22/99 KOEPKE,CJLES E 70331 O1/22/99 KRENN,CAMILLE A 70332 O1/22/99 K(]HL,SCOTT A 70333 01/22/99 LIBBY,MEGAN K 70334 01/22/99 MALONE,BRANDON M 70335 01/22/99 MARUSKA 70336 01/22/99 MEISEL,7AMBREY 70337 01/22/99 MEYER ,HEATHER ANN 70338 01/22/99 MOREHEAD,PHILIP L 70339 01/22/99 MOTZ M 7 40 01/22/99 OWEN,JONATHAN 70341 01/22/99 READ,ANGEi'A J 70342 01/22/99 REGESTER, DOUG AMOUNT 379.10 148.50 1.09.20 182.49 354.25 224.80 61^75 33.75 40.80 58.50 330.00 108.88 46.20 71.50 13.00 91.00 14.00 82.33 58.50 27.100 80.40 43.55 36.03 40.00 184.68 CITY OF MAPi'EWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS [KARNINGS REPORT CHECK NUMBE CHECK DATE EMPLly/EE NAME AMOUNT 744 01/22/99 UET,LI E 75..()() 70345 01/22/99 SELIN,JASON M 13.10 70346 01/22/99 SHAFFER,GUSAN A 65.00 70347 01/22/99 SHERRILL,MASDN D 101.53 70 348 01 /2 2/99 SIMONSON,JUSTIN M 179.50 70349 O1/22/99 SMITLEY,SHARON L 150.40 70 350 01/22/99 SWANER,JESSICA 102 , 20 70351 O1/22/99 TIBODEAU,HEATHER J 100.80 70355 01/22/99 TOURTEL.OTTE,MARYN J 87.75 70356 O1/22/99 TROENDLE,ALEIS A M 310.20 7O357 01/22/99 WARMAN,JOANNE M 315 44 70358 01/22/99 WARNER,CAROLyN 143.25 70359 01/22/99 WEDES,CARYL H 109.50 70360 01/22/99 WILLIAMS,KELLY M 742.62 70361 01/22/99 WOLKERSTORFER,HEATHER L 91.80 70 362 01/22/99 WOODMAN,ALICE E 199.20 70363 01/22/99 ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L 73.13 70364 01/22/99 DISKERUD,HEATHER A 187.25 70365 01/22/99 GLASS,GILLIAN 43.40 70366 01/22/99 MACIOCH,AMY L 12 40 70367 01/22/99 MALDONADO,ANGELA M 12.00 70368 O1/22/99 PRICE,JENNIFER L 86.13 70369 01/22/99 SCHROElZ,KATHi'EEN 214.00 7037O 01/22/S`9 SFNGLER,[]}NA E 173.95 7 O371 01/22/99 ANTON,SARAH E 132.30 030 CITY OF EMPLOYEE GROSS ERNINGS REPORT FOR THE CiJRRENT PAY FRIOD CHECK NUMBER CHE[]( DATE 70372 70373 70374 70375 70376 70377 7O378 70379 70380 70381 70382 70383 70384 70385 0386 70387 70388 7(389 70390 7 0391 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 O1/~22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 O1/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 01/22/99 EMPLOYEE NAME BED-WIN,JAMES BLAKESLEY, JEFFERY DEAN CALLEN,l(ATIE E CHAPEAU,GREG M FULLER,AY R HEMPFER,NIC]LAS W JAHN,DAVID J . KASSON,JULIE E KOSKI,JOHN F KYRK,BREANNA K MATTESON,FRANK M PRINS,KELLY M SEVERSON,CHRIST(NA M STEINHORST,JEFFREY SWANC).84,LYLE SWANSON,VERONICA YOUMG,DILLON J AICHELE,CRAIG J MULVANEY,DENNIS M PRIEM, STEVEN A. AMOUNT 1228.12 352.{)0 57.00 189.0( 94.5( 144.00 1291.17 48.00 567.67 50.40 86.00 114.00 132.3( 215.83 1460.49 1031.92 112.32 797.54 1628.12 1427.30 r AGENDA ITEM &,Z AGENDA REPORT Aoti.o t .urol2 doxs a d,...,,,TO: City Manager : Modifie FROM: Assistant City Engineer ReJ ease Da to SUBJECT: Harvester Avenue and Sterling Street Improvement, Project 97 -16 Mn /DOT Limited Use Permit DATE: February 1, 1999 As part of the Harvester Avenue project, a cul -de -sac was created at the west end of the street, which severed it from Stillwater Road. It was apparent that in addition to a bus stop at that end of Harvester Avenue, that there was a fair amount of pedestrian traffic that passed between Harvester Avenue and Bartelmy Lane. It was felt that a trail connection was important in this area. The placement of a trail between Bartelmy Lane and the end of the new Harvester Avenue cul -de -sac required that it be placed on the Stillwater Road (STH 5) right -of- way. In August of 1998, Mn /DOT verbally approved the placement of the trail on their right -of -way as not to delay construction, but would require that the city approve a Limited Use Permit at a later date. Attached is a copy of the standard Limited Use Permit from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Staff recommends that the city council approve the conditions of the Limited Use Permit for the placement of the 8 -foot bituminous trail on State. Highway 5 right - of -way between Harvester Avenue and Bartelmy Lane, and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute said Limited Use Permit with the Minnesota Department of Transportation. CIVIC jC Attachment STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LIMITED USE PERMIT C.S. 6230(5= 45 -21) County of Ramsey S.A.P. No. 138 - 130 -01 Harvester Avenue Improvement City of Maplewood In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 161.434 and Federal -Aid Policy Guide, Part 652, a Limited Use Permit is hereby granted to the City of Maplewood, Permittee. This permit is for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and operating a non - motorized recreational trail, (hereinafter called trail), within the right of way of Trunk Highway No. 5 as shown in red on Exhibit "A ", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This permit is executed by the Permittee pursuant to the attached resolution. In addition, the following special provisions shall apply: SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. The construction, maintenance, and supervision of the trail shall be at no expense to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2. Before construction of any kind, the plans for such construction shall be approved in writing by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, through the Division Engineer. 3. No permanent structure(s) or advertising device(s) in any manner, form or size shall be constructed, placed or permitted to be constructed or placed upon the State of Minnesota right of way. 4. No commercial activity or activities shall be allowed to operate upon said State of Minnesota right of way. Page 1 of 4 5. Any and all maintenance of the trail shall be provided by the Permittee; this includes, but is not limited to, the plowing and removal of snow, and the installation and removal of regulatory signs. 6. This permit is non - exclusive and is granted subject to the rights of others, including, but not limited to public utilities which may occupy said right of way. 7. The Permittee shall preserve and protect all utilities located on the lands covered by this,, permit at no expense to the Minnesota Department of Transportation and it shall be the responsibility of the Permittee to call the Gopher State One Call System at 1- 800 - 252 -1166 at least 48 hours prior to performing any excavation. 8. Any crossings of the trail over the trunk highway shall be perpendicular to the centerline of the highway and shall provide and ensure reasonable and adequate stopping sight distance. 9. The Permittee shall construct the trail at the location shown in the attached Exhibit "A" subject to verification by the Minnesota Department of Transportation Division Engineer that the construction geometrics and procedures result in a trail that is compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the highway facility. 10. Approval from Minnesota Department of Transportation Division Engineer shall be required for any changes from the approved plan. 11. Upon completion of the construction of the trail, the Permittee shall restore all disturbed slopes and ditches in such manner that drainage, erosion control and aesthetics are perpetuated. 12. This permit does not release the Permittee from any liability or obligation imposed by federal law, Minnesota Statutes, local ordinances, or other agency regulations relating thereto and any necessary permits relating thereto shall be applied for and obtained by the Permittee. 13. Any use permitted by this permit shall remain subordinate to the right of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to use the property for highway and transportation purposes. This permit does not grant any interest whatsoever in land, nor does it establish a permanent park, recreation area or wildlife or waterfowl refuge facility that would become subject to Section 4 (f) of the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1968, .nor does this permit establish a Bikeway or Pedestrian way which would require replacement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Secti0n 160.264. Page 2 of 4 14. This permit shall be subject to cancellation and termination by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, with or without cause, by giving the Permittee 60 days written notice of such intent. Upon said notice of cancellation the trail shall be removed within 60 days, at no cost to the Minnesota Department of Transportation, by the Permittee and at the sole expense of the Permittee. Upon cancellation of said permit, or any portion thereof, the Permittee will be required to return and restore the area to a condition satisfactory to the Minnesota Department of Transportation Division Engineer. 15. The Permittee, for itself, its successors; and assigns, agrees to abide by the provisions of Title VI Appendix C of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which provides in part that no person in the United States, shall on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from, or denied use of any trail. 16. The Permittee shall hold harmless and indemnify the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees and its successors and assigns, from liability claims for damages because of bodily injury, death, property damage, sickness, disease, or loss and expense arising from the operations of the trail or from the use of the portion of highway right of way over which this permit is granted. 17. The Permittee shall hold harmless and indemnify the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees and its successors and assigns from claims arising or resulting from the temporary or permanent termination of trail user rights on any portion of highway right of way over which this permit is granted. 18. The State of Minnesota, through its Commissioner of Transportation, shall retain the right to limit and /or restrict the parking of vehicles and assemblage of trail users on the highway right of way over which this permit is granted, so as to maintain the safety of both the motoring public and trail users. 19. The Permittee will hold harmless and indemnify the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees from claims resulting from temporary or permanent changes in drainage patterns resulting in flood damage. 20. The Permittee shall not dispose of any materials regulated by any governmental or regulatory agency onto the ground, or into any body of water, or into any container on the State's right of way. In the event of spillage of regulated materials, the Permittee shall provide for cleanup of the spilled material and of materials contaminated by the spillage in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, at the sole expense of the Permittee. Page 3 of 4 21. The Permittee (for itself, its contractors, subcontractors, its materialmen, and all other persons acting for, through or under it or any of them), covenants that no laborers', mechanics', or materialmens' liens or other liens or claims of any kind whatsoever shall be filed or maintained by it or by any subcontractor, materialmen or other person or persons acting for, through or under it or any of them against the work and /or against said lands, for or on account of any work done or materials furnished by it or any of them under any agreement or any amendment or supplement thereto; agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the State of Minnesota from all such liens and claims. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL M Division Eng Date: s I APPROVED BY: COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION By Director, Office of Land Management Date: The Commissioner of Transportation by the execution of this permit certifies that this permit is necessary in the public interest and that the use intended is for public purposes. By: Its Mayor And: Its City Manager Date: Page 4of4 r ,. ,.... ...._ ...... .... ..., .. .... .,.. .. . ....._... _,,.,, -... , .._,,.... ...,- r: -. ».. nR. r ...,.•.. -, - .,.,_. , .... ... ... ... i .-'- n^-. °. x "!.^. t.., n+- n, -- c•; . rnr... - ,,. ..+*„-- .- .+ r: mx t•°^^^* ....,....,.•..,,- . ,..,..... .... - . . w ,: TY.... .- i- ..:.- . s ,.. rry . ,.. y : ..,':^. ...... . fi F RO PC6 C.- D - FRAIZ- 60X7- j6WS 1 0 JAJ PAAF LA 71- h 130 n 00e O REMOVE EXI ROAD -- f 5 \ SEE SURFACE oo& AGGREGATE ASE. , r -• PL E' TOPSOIL & GRAD TO C j \ MAI! D I S TURB ED AR A . ,;- d AIN SOD D 1 COr. P x SIGN 2.. 4f 13 fT. TRAI L W OR AS DIR C D X= - r 4 , END TRAIL AT T. H.S. R/ 8 1 ENGINEER G ING FOR TRAJL S ' BE INCIDENTAL 1• .. -- THEE ( ) , 5 \ 1 d SW Ilk t O SAW. 0 NT I I REMOVE EXISTiN DRIVE PARKING , 6N T i i '•, \ ., fit• • 1 ' 0 + 005. SALVAGE 21 m OF 0 CP CULVERT & \ G CrE DITCH TO DRAIN. WOODEN FENCE, P. NSTALL AS DIRECTED BY TI E " } RECONNECT D VE A REPAIR BROKEN CURB AQMx1 ; TO CUL — DE — SA \ `., STOP BOX ( T P SECTION ) DIRECTED B Y , ADJUST ENGINEER 4- ' P OPOSED R DROPCURB OPE ,• , • ENTER of — DE - SAC a ( 0 + 068 3. 25m LT, 310, 288 40mo FOR TRAIL - ANC :. PROTECT EXISTING L. TEMPORARY EASEM eo/U) slcrt i CO SALVAGE 16m O" OOD x SIGN RAIL FENCE EI N STALL AS 7 < DIRECTED B THE GINEER ;, \ f•_. .--• 0 c 4 ABAND NED MONI RING LL - 1 ' C © NC ' 0D AP 0 m BEL URFAC PRO CONd ui • I Agenda Item, G3 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Plumbing Inspection Fees DATE: February 1, 1999 INFORMATION Aotion by Council: Endorse Modif i ed.r..., Rejeete _ Date The commercial inspector is requesting an increase in fees. He is requesting that the permit fee° be "$50 plus 1:25 percent of the plumbing cost. The current fee is $20 plus $5 per opening. This rate was set in 1990. Attached is a survey of other nearby cities. This survey shows commercial charges using a 18,000 plumbing j 14 fixture openings. This increase would bring us in line with whatg other cities are collecting. The wage paid to the inspector is 80 percent of the total plumbing permit fee and the remaining 20 percent is paid to Maplewood. The city currently pays the electrical inspector this same rate. RECOMMENDATION Approve an increase in plumbing fees to $50 plus 1.25 percent of the total plumbing cost. Attachment: Letter Survey This permit was taken in the City of Maplewood by A.C. Doyle Plumbing for the Sheet Metal Workers Hall addition: Cost of permit, 14 fixtures at $5 each $70.00 permit fee 20.00 surcharge .50 90.50 Estimated trips for inspections - 5 Plumbing permit with new charges: Estimated cost of plumbing: 18,000 x 1.25 = $225.00 permit fee: 50.00 surcharge .50 275.50 Inspector receives $220. City of Maplewood receives $55.50 If this job was installed in the City of Woodbury, commercial charges are: 1 % of estimated value of plumbing: 18,000 = $180.00 permit fee 30.00 surcharge 250 210.50 If this job was installed in the City of Roseville, commercial charges are: 14 fixtures at $8 each $112.00 permit fee 20.00 surcharge .50 132.50 If this job was installed in the City of Saint Paul, commercial charges are: 14 fixtures at $20 each $280.00 permit fee 25.00 surcharge .50 305.50 Agenda G MEMORANDUM TO: Michael A. McGuire, City(Ma a e FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Direct f Pa DATE: January 21, 1999 for the Feb ary 8, SUBJECT: Odegard Donation lotion by Council: Endorsed Mo d i f i e d..,. Rej ected.,., Date crffiation City Council Meeting The Maplewood Nature Center has received $250 from Robert and Carolyn Odegard. I would recommend that the City Council formally accept this donation and authorize the .appropriate budget changes. The money will be credited to the Nature Center budget for future capital improvements. Should you have questions, please call me at 4573. A thank you letter has been sent. kd\odegard. me c: Ann Hutchinson, Lead Naturalist Agenda Item G 5 Agenda Report To: City Manager From: Doug Taubman Recreation Program Coordinator Subject: Acceptance of Donation Date: January 19, 1999 Aotion by Council: Endo3rse Date Introduction In December the Northeast Soccer Association (NESA) offered to donate approximately two thousand dollars in soccer balls and soccer nets to the Maplewood Parks and Recreation youth soccer program.. The donation is in exchange for a small storage area in the recreation divisions equipment storage room. Background The Maplewood Parks and Recreation youth soccer program was established approximately twenty years ago due, in a large part, to the efforts of MESA. MESA provided the expertise and manpower which enabled our, department to establish a youth recreational soccer program which now serves over thirteen hundred youth in our community. To this day, MESA, which provides traveling soccer opportunities to youth, in our community, and our department work cooperatively to provide both traveling and recreational soccer leagues for children from the ages of eight to eighteen. Recommendation Accept the equipment donation in exchange for the storage area. AGENDA NO. V ` (0 AGENDA REPORT TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cler DATE: February 1, 1999 RE: Temporary Liquor License Aot ion bV Council: Endorsed...v_.. Modified .- Rejected. Dat ... . Kathleen Yzermans, 1424 East Eldridge, has submitted an application fora liquor license to be used at the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary for their annual Valentine Dinner and Dance scheduled for February 13, 1999. City Code directs that temporary liquor license be approved by the City Council. It has not been past practice to conduct investigations on temporary permits. One of the requirements in obtaining a liquor license from the City is proof of insurance in the form of a Certificate of Insurance showing that the City is the Certificate Holder. The Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary is insured by The Catholic Mutual Relief Society who is the insurer of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis. Since Catholic Mutual insures various Parishes under one policy, they can not name the City as the Certificate Holder but will name the City as additionally insured. It recommended that Council approve the application for a t o liquor license and waive the standard procedure of being name the Certificate Holder on the insurance policy and accept the City being additionally insured for the requested dates. AGENDA REPORT Action b Counoil; Endorse TO: Cit Manager Modified Rejected......... FROM: Finance Director Date """ - •- --- RE: TRANSFERS FROM TAX INCREMENT FUNDS DATE: Januar 26, 1999 PROPOSAL It is proposed that the Council authorize the appropriate 1998 bud adjustments and 1998 transfers totalin $863,200 from the Tax Increment Funds to the Debt Service Funds. BACKGROUND Annuall transfers are made from the Tax Increment Funds to finance expenditures in other funds. The 1998 transfers from the Tax Increment Funds will finance debt service costs on tax -increment bonds totalin $863,200 in three debt service funds. A breakdown b fund and comparison with the ori bud is listed on the attachment. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the appropriate 1998 bud adjustments and 1998 transfers totalin $863,200 from the Tax Increment Funds to the Debt Service Funds. PAF1NANCEXWP\AGN\T1F98.WPD r ssr FILE NAME: TIF r RAN LOCATION: C:1123R5W\MISC DATE: 26- Jan -99 PREPARED BY: DF 1998 TRANSFERS FROM TAX INCREMENT FUNDS TO DEBT SERVICE FUNDS To eliminate cash deficits) OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT FROM TIF FUNDS: Fund #412 Economic Development District 1 -3 1998 1998 1998 BUDGET CHANGES Fund #418 Housing District 1 -1 BUDGET*RE -EST.*ACTUAL AMOUNT ACCT. NO. OPERATING TRANSFERS IN TO DEBT SERVICE FUNDS: 221,070 248,550 250,000 Fund #321 1989 Tax - Exempt Tax Inc. Bonds 18,360 18,360 19,500 1 321 -999 -3999 Fund #326 1992 Tax Increment Bonds 212 212 201 11,180) 326 -999 -3999 Fund #328 1993 Tax Increment Bonds 655 655 642,000 13 328 -999 -3999 Total transfers 886 886 863 23,060) OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT FROM TIF FUNDS: Fund #412 Economic Development District 1 -3 352 282,280 285,100 67,000) 412 -999 -4999 Fund #418 Housing District 1 -1 141,480 167,820 169 28 413 -999 -4999 Fund #414 Housing District 1 -2 221,070 248,550 250,000 281930 . ' 414 -999 -4999 Fund #415 Housing District 1 -3 171,610 184,900 158 13 415 -999 -4999 Total transfers 886,260 883 863,200 23,060) PER PAFINANCEIBUDM1SC\TRSF9899 AGENDA NO. -&S TO: Cit Mana AGENDA REPORT FROM: Finance Director )O?Z*e iActionbyCounoil9 Endorsed., Xodifiec'L.- ReJected.- Date RE: TRANSFERS TO CLOSE DEBT SERVICE FUNDS FOR TWO BOND ISSUES DATE: Januar 28, 1999 PROPOSAL It is proposed that effective 12-31-98 (1} Debt Service Fund #322 for the 1990 Improvement Bonds be closed b a transfer of the remainin balance of $68,317.36 to the General Fund, ( 2 ) Debt Service Fund #327 for the 1993 Capital Notes be closed b a transfer of the remainin balance of $828.76 to the General Fund and (3 that the appropriate bud adjustments be approved. BACKGROUND The final principal and interest pa have been made on two bond issues. The current balances in the debt service funds for each bond issue is as follows: 68,317.36 Fund #322 for the 1990 Improvement Bonds 828.76 Fund #327 for the 1993 Capital Notes 69,146.12 Net Total Accordin to State law (MSA 475.61, Subd. 4 an surplus remainin in a debt service fund after the bonds and interest have been paid ma be appropriated to an other general purpose. Since tax lev limits are in effect, the net surplus of $69,146.12 should be transferred to the General Fund to ease the burden of balancin the 2000 Budget. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that effective 12-31-98 ( 1 ) Debt Service Fund #322 for the 1990 Improvement Bonds be closed b a transfer of the remainin balance of $68,317.36 to the General Fund, ( 2 ) Debt Service Fund #327 for the 1993 Capital Notes be closed b a transfer of the remainin balance of 828.76 to the General Fund and ( 3 ) that the appropriate bud adjustments be approved. P:1FINANCE\WP\AGN\DEBT98.WPD r v , a Agenda. No. CV I AGENDA REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: February 2, 1999 Mike McGuire City Manager Sherrie e Human Resource Director Action by Council: Endorsed.,.. Nodifie Date SUBJECT: Proposed Settlement - Metro Supervisory Association I have attached the proposed two -year negotiated contract settlement between the City and the Metro Supervisory .Association. This settlement has been ratified by their membership. In addition, I have included the Bureau of Mediation Services Uniform Settlement Document. By Law, this must be presented to the City Council with the proposed settlement. Approval of this settlement is recommended. If you have any questions, please let me know. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AND METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOCIATION CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS TENTATIVE SETTLEMENT December 11, 1998 1. Duration Two year agreement to expire December 31, 2000. 2. Wages General wage increase of 2% retroactive to 1 -1 -99 with an additional I% effective 7 -1 -99. General wage increase of 3% for January 1, 2000. 3. Recognition Delete titles that have moved to non -union or no longer exist; add new titles that were created or revised since 1 -1- 96. Delete: Recreation Program Coordinator 71, Operations Supervisor, Recreation Program Manager, Pubic Works Coordinator, Deputy City Clerk, Aquatics Program Assistant, and Child Care Coordinator. Add: Administrative Assistant - Public Works and Night Community Centex Supervisor. 4. Grievance Article 14 - 14.2 Step 2 Change 7 to 14 days; Step 3 Change 7 to 14 days. Step 4. Agree to change "panel of five arbiters" to "panel of seven arbiters." 5. Holidays 16. l -Allow waiver of the provision that employees must work for the City 30 days to receive holiday pay, under the condition that the employee must repay any holiday pay received during the first 30 days if they leave employment within the first six months. (Same as recently revised Personnel Policies) 6. Safet, S Article 22 - Revise to provide $45 toward the cost of safety shoes if required by the City. 7. Vacation Article 15 - 15.2 Revise to allow the City Manager to approve exceptions to the general rule that an employee must work for six months prior to taking vacation leave. 15.3 Revised the language on vacation carry-over to allow conversion of up to one week of vacation to deferred compensation. The language would read: On December 1st of each year, full-time and regular part- time employees who are at the three week vacation accrual rate or higher, with a minimum balance of 80 hours, shall be eligible to convert up to 40 hours of unused vacation time to deferred compensation. Conversion will be at the employee's current hourly rate as of 12 -01 and will be on the basis of one hour of vacation for one hour of deferred compensation pay. Actual conversion will take place in the second payroll of the following year." 15.4 Delete provision stating employees shall receive their vacation pay no later than the last work day prior to the start of their vacation period. 8. Deferred We increased the City's Contribution to deferred Compensation compensation by $10 per month (from $75 to $85) effective January 1, 1999. No change in second year. 9. Probation Article 10 - Increase promotion and transfer probationary periods to one year from six months. 10. Bumping Article 11 - 11.3 Add the requirement that an employee must have previously served in a given job class to be able to bump another employee, in the event of a layoff. 11. Merit Pav Article 29 - Delete in entirety. Replace with: Employees are eligible for merit pay in accordance with the City's merit pay program. Employees are eligible for up to 5% of their annual salary, based on performance, to be paid in a lump- sum on an annual basis. Merit pay will not be added to an employee's base salary. If the current City Manager (current as of 12'98) terminates employment with the City, or the average payout falls below 3% of the bargaining unit's total pay, the MSA has the option to revert back to the guaranteed 3% which was the language of Article 29 of the 1996 -98 agreement. MSA will notify the City prior to January 1 if they elect this option. SUPPLEMENTAL WORKSHEET: OTHER FORMS OF COMPENSATION Ci of i'lap1 ePUBLICEMPLOYER: - EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE: Metro Supervisors UNIT: OTHER FORMS OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF BOX A + B NUMBER OF BOX C + D NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION EMPLOYEES X OTHER EMPLOYEES X NEW EMPLOYEES X NEW X NEW DOLLARS PER EMPLOYEE OVERCOMPENSATIONDOLLARSPERDOLLARSPER BOX EDOLLARSPEREMPLOYEEEMPLOYEEOVERBOXAEMPLOYEEOVERBOXC A)B)C)0)E)F) Uniform or Clothing 60 75 1 5 0 135Allowance Payment for Additional r EducationTrainingo No Change N Change No Change No Change No Change Tool Allowance No Change No Change No Change No Change No Change Call-Back to Work PaymentY No Change o ChangeNCg No Changeg No Changeg No Changeg Stand -By or On -Call Pa mev No Change No Change o Change No Change No Change License Payment No ch ange No Change No Chang No Change No Change Payment for Separating No Change No Change No ChanqE No Change.o Change from Employment No Change No Change No Ch No Change Q Change Retirees Insurance Payme 50 75 135 0 1;35:. COLUMN TOTAL COLUMN TOTAL COLUMN TOTAL COLUMN TOTAL COLUMN TOTAL COLUMN TOTAL ENTER BOX 12 ENTER BOX 22 ENTER BOX 35 ENTER BOX 45 ENTER BOX 58 ENTER BOX 68 5-18-94 AFBCME u UNIFORM SETTLEMENT FORM PUBLIC EMPLOYER: Ci of Mapi Pwnnd EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE Metro Supervisory Association UNIT: Base Year F S Year of Contract 2nd Year Base Year of Contract (if applicable )Seconds 3rd Year Base Third Year of Contract (if applicable) to1Dates1) -31 -98 Dates 2) 1 -1 -99 to 12 -31 -99 Dates 3) 1 -1 -2000 to 12- 3120 Dates 4 'N A Base Wage 5) 5332166 New $ by Wage Sche le Base Wage 28) 5559264 New $ by Wage Schedule Base Wage 51) _New $ by Wage Schedule Improvement 14)382.47 Improvement 37)N Improvement 60) New $ by Wage Schedule New $ by Wage Sched le New $ by Wage Schedule Movement 15) 8,715.20 Movement 38) 2054 .40 Movement 61) Base Social Security 402787 New $ Social Security 12690.47 Base Social Security 429478 New $ Social Security 1 660 .99 Base'Social Security New $ Social Security 61 A)Contribution 5A)Contribution 15A)Contribution 28A)Contribution 38A)Contribution 51A) _Contribution Base State or New $ State or Base State or New $ State or Base State or New $ State or Local Retirement 27 618 Local Retirement 1,144.66 Local Retirement 28 763 Local Retirement Local Retirement Local Retirement 61 B)Contribution 5B) ,Contribution 15B)Contribution 288) ,Contribution 38B) 1,124.70 Contribution 51 B) _Contribution Base Medical 3 ,168.0 New $ for Medical Base Medical New $ for Medical 0 Base Medical New $ for Medical Insurance 6)Insurance 16)0 Insurance 29) 3,168.09 Insurance 39)Insurance 52)Insurance 62) Base Dental 365.New $ for Dental 0 Base Dental 365 .30 New $ for Dental 0 Base Dental New $ for Dental Insurance 7)Insurance 17)Insurance 30)Insurance 40)Insurance 53)Insurance 63) Base Life New $ for Life Base Life New $ for Life 0 Base Life New $ for Life - Insurance 8) 96 .57 Insurance 18)0 Insurance 31) 96 .57 Insurance 41)Insurance 54)Insurance 64) Base Shift NSA New $ for Shift NSA Base Shift New $ Ior Shift NSA Base Shift New $ for Shift Differential 9)Differential 19)Differential 32) NIA Differential 42)Differential 55)Differential 65) Base Extra-New $ for Extra-Base Extra -'New $ for Extra-Base Extra-New $ for Extra - Curricular* 10) NSA Curricular 20)NSA Curricular* 33) NSA Curricular 43) — NIA Curricular* 56)Curricular 66) Base Deferred 112700 New $ for Deferred 1, 560 Base Deferred New $ for Deferred 0 Base Deferred New $ for Deferred Compensation 11)Compensation 21)Compensation 34) 13.260 Compensation 44)Compensation 57)Compensation 67) Base Other New $ for Other Base Other New $ for Other Base Other New $ for Other Forms of Forms of Forms of Forms of Forms of Forms of Compensation 12) 60.00 Compensation 22)75 Compensation 35) 13 5 Compensation 45) 0 Compensation 58)Compensation 68) Total New $ Change 26, 567 Total New $ Change 24 4 98 Total New $ Change 69)from baseline 23)from Baseline 46)from Baseline Change from Baseline 24) 4.31 Change 3. 81 from Baseline 47) Change from Baseline 70) % Base Year 616,960 96 Total First Year Base Year Total Second Year 668 027 .96 Base Year Total Third Year Total Baseline 13) -Settlement 25) _643 528.7 Total Baseline 36) 643 , 529 .96 $ Settlement 48) 'Total Baseline 59)Settlement 71) Lump Sum Payment 26 0 Lump Sum Payment 49 0 Lump Sum Payment 72 Applies to education Increase over 0 0oIncreaseover o ° Increase over l mitt only.Baseline 27)Baseline 50)Baseline 73) LCER Supplemental Uniform Settlement Reporting Form 101 Public employer name b C i ty of Maplewood 102 Contact p erson name Sherr re L.. Le 103 Phone number of contact P erson 651,- 770 104 Name of exclusive representative Metro : Su.pery.Jsor4 Associ 105 Unit composition ( e.g.,police, clerical, comprehensive, etc.) : 1st L i - S u ne_ry i s o rsp 106 Is the unit essential or non - essential? E s s ent 107 Base year calculation date (from BMS Instructions, page 2) 12- 3198 108 Base ear employees. (from BMS Instructions, page 2) 13 -Y - 109 Date mediation requested (if applicable) 110 Date strike notice given (if applicable) 111 Dates of strike (if applicable) 112 Tentative settlement date 113 Date arbitration requested (if applicable) 114 Name of arbitrator (if applicable) 115 Date of first arbitration hearing (if applicable) 116 Date final briefs filed (if applicable) 117 Date of award (if applicable) WA N/A N/A N/A N/A WA NSA. 118 Name of county(ies) within which your jurisdiction is located Ramsey 119 Regional development number ( if available) cdy Icer 9/14/94 Agenda No. 001'L+1k 40 AGENDA REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: February 2, 1999 Mike McGuire City Manager Sherrie e Human Resource Director SUBJECT: Proposed Settlement - LELS Local # 153 Action by Coun 9ndorsed ofi e e. Dad I have attached the proposed negotiated contract settlement between the City and LELS Local # 153 representing the police officers. This settlement has been ratified by their membership. in addition, I have included the Bureau of Mediation Services Uniform Settlement Document. By Law, this must be presented to the City Council with the proposed settlement. Approval of this settlement is recommended. If you have any questions, please let me know. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AND LELS #153 - POLICE OFFICERS CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS TENTATIVE SETTLEMENT December 30, 1998 1. Wages and Duration: Two year contract; 2% January 1, 1 999; 1 %July 1, 1999; 3 %January 1, 2000. 2. Deferred Compensation: Increase to $85 per month in 1999; remain at $85 per month in 2000. 3. Retain the longevity pay system currently in place; increase the 4 year rate by 10 to $92.32, increase the 8 year rate by $20 to $157.20, increase the 12 year rate for affected employees by $30 to $222.08, increase the 16 year rate for affected employees by $40 to $286.96. (ArticleAMI) 4. Article IX Seniority - revise as follows: Revise 9.5 to read: By October 1st of each year the Employer shall post for bid the shifts for the following calendar year, for two periods, January through June and July through December. Employees shall finish their bidding for shifts by November 1st. Such shift bidding shall be implemented by January 1st. If the Employer determines different staffing levels are needed on any shift, the shifts may be rebid in the interim periods as determined necessary by the Employer." Revise 9.6 to read: Employees may select two continuous vacation periods by seniority in the fall for the following calendar year. The first choice shall be selected from a posting posted by November 2nd. Such selection shall be completed by November 30th. The second choice shall be selected from a posting posted by December 1st. Such selection shall be completed by December 31st. There shall be no second choice bids until first choice bids have been completed. Employees shall bid in a timely manner. After December 31st, vacations shall be bid on a first come, first served basis." 5. Article XIX Revise to read: The Employer shall provide required uniform and equipment items, but not to exceed $600 per year. Up to $200 can be carried over from the previous year, if unspent, to be spent on major purchases (those not normally purchased on an annual basis, e.g. jackets, boots etc.). Up to 425 per officer for plainclothes officers will be reimbursed for necessary items that are purchased in Maplewood." The Employer will reimburse officers $45 of the cost of peace officer license renewal." 6. Article XIV Revise to read: Employees who are required to appear in Court during their scheduled off -duty time shall receive a minimum of three hovers pay at one and one- half times the employee's base gay rate. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift for Court appearance does not qualify the employees for the three hours minimum." 7. Article X Revise to add new 10.7 as follows: The Employer will remove old disciplinary letters after five years if no further discipline, above that of a verbal reprimand, has occurred within that five year period." 8. Appendix A Revise to add 2 Q Based on requirements in the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), Dog Handlers will be paid thirty (30) minutes each calendar day at time and one -half their regular rate of pay for care, maintenance, and training of the officer's dog. Whenever an officer's dog is placed in a kennel, the additional compensation (30 minutes at time and one-half) will not apply for that day(s). The officer must notify his/her supervisor whenever the dog is placed in a kennel prior to submitting a timecard for that pay period. The kennel fee, if there is a fee, will be paid by the Employer. The Employer must approve the kennel." Any time in excess of thirty (30) minutes per day needed for care, maintenance, or training of the officer's dog must be authorized in advance by the Chief of Police or his/her designee. In the event that the FLSA requirements no longer apply, then the method of compensation for dog handlers would immediately revert back to the 4% differential over top patrol." 9. Article IX Seniority 9.1 is amended as follows: Seniority shall be determined by the employee's start date in the job class, regardless of whether they were initially hired as part time or full time officers. Seniority shall be determined by the employee's length of continuous employment with the Police Department and posted in an appropriate location." (Last sentence the same.) 10. Appendix B Article B -1 Vacations to be revised as Follows: B -1 b. Employees may not take annual leave during the first six months of service without the approval of the employer. SUPPLEMENTAL WORKSHEET: OTHER FORMS OF COMPENSATION PUBLIC EMPLOYER: Ci tv of dao woo EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE LELS #153 UNIT: OTHER FORMS OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF BOX A + B NUMBER OF BOX C + D NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION EMPLOYEES X OTHER EMPLOYEES X NEW EMPLOYEES X NEW X NEW DOLLARS PER COMPENSATION DOLLARS PER DOLLARS PER EMPLOYEE OVER DOLLARS PER EMPLOYEE EMPLOYEE OVER BOX A EMPLOYEE OVER BOX C BOX E A)B)C)D)E).F) Uniform or Clothing 1 150 1 0 Allowance Payment for Additional No Change No Changeg No Chang No Change Trainin or Educationg Tool Allowance No Change No Change No ChangE No Change Call -Back to No Changeg No Changeg No Chan.g No Chan g e Work PaymentY Stand - By Or On -Call No Changeg No Changeg No Changeg No Chan g e PaymentY 0 480 480 480 License Payment Payment for Separating No Changeg No Changeg No Changeg No ChangefromEmployment No Change No Change No Change No Change Retirees Insurance Payments 1 630 1 480 COLUMN TOTAL COLUMN TOTAL COLUMN TOTAL COLUMN TOTAL COLUMN TOTAL COLUMN TOTAL ENTER BOX 12 ENTER BOX 22 ENTER BOX 35 ENTER BOX 45 ENTER BOX 58 ENTER BOX 68 5- 18 -94M UNIFORM SETTLEMENT FORM UBLIC EMPLOYER: City of Maplewood EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE: L • E • L. S. Local #153 UNIT: Police Officers Base Year Fir Sf Year of Contract 2nd Year Base Second Year of Contract (if applicable)3rd Year Base Third Year of Contract (if applicable) Dates 1) 1 -1 -98 to Dates 2) , -1 -9A to 1 2 -1 -99 Dates 3) 1 -1 -2000 to 12 . 31 ^2000 Dates 4) N / A Base Wage 5) 1,471,870 $ by Wage Schedule Base Wage 28) 11551 ,770. 39New $ by Wage Schedule Base Wage 51) _New $ by Wage Schedule Improvement 14) _ 36 , 943 .95 Improvement 37) 46, 553 .11 Improvement 60) New $ by Wage Sched4l 956.04 New $ by Wage Schedule New $ by Wage Schedule Movement 15) 'Movement 38) 18 0072, 7 2 Movement 61) Base Social Security New $ Social Security Base Social Security New $ Social Security Base'Social Security New $ Social Security Contribution 5A)l 12 a 599, 09Contribution 15A) 69112.35 Contribution 28AI 187i 4 contribution 38A) 4 Contribution 51A)Contribution 61A) Base State or New $ State or Base State or New $ State or Base State or New $ State or Local Retirement Local Retirement Contribution 5B) 76 , 242 . 89Contribution 15B) ,138.8 Local Retirement Local Retirement Contribution 28B) 30 , 38 y . 7 kontribution 38B) 3 , 347.62 Local Retirement Contribution 51 B) Local Retirement Contribution 61 B) Base Medical New $ for Medical Base Medical New $ for Medical Base Medical New $ for Medical Insurance 6112 .609.68 Insurance 16) 0 Insurance 29) 112.609.68 Insurance 39) n Insurance 52) __Insurance 62) Base Dental New $ for Dental Base Dental New $ for Dental Base Dental New $ for Dental Insurance 7) _Z.9.a0 Insurance 17) 0 Insurance 30) 10 , 790.40 Insurance 40) 0 Insurance 53) _ _Insurance 63) Base Life New $ for Life Base Life New $ for Life Base Life New $ for Life Insurance 8) 162.5 Insurance 18) 0 Insurance 31) 162.56 Insurance 41) 0 Insurance 54)Insurance 64) - Base Shift New $ for Shift Base Shift New $ for Shift Base Shift New $ for Shift Differential 9) 0 Differential 19) 0 Differential 32) 0 Differential 42) 0 Differential 55)Differential 65) Base Extra-New $ for Extra-Base Extra -'New $ for Extra-Base Extra- 'New $ for Extra - Curricular*10) 0 Curricular 20) 0 Curricular*33) 0 Curricular 43) 0 Curricular* 56) _._..Curricular 66) Base Deferred New $ for Deferred Base Deferred New $ for Deferred 0 Base Deferred New $ for Deferred Compensation 11) 30.72_ Compensation 21) 1,92_Compensation 34) 32 .640 Compensation 44)Compensation 57)Compensation 67) Base Other New $ for Other Base Other New $ for Other Base Other New $ for Other Forms of Forms of Forms of Forms of Forms of Forms of Compensation 12) 1,125 Compensation 22) 630 Compensation 35) 1 Compensation 45) 480 Compensation 58)Compensation 68) Total New $ Change Total New $ Change Total New $ Change from Baseline 23) _ 92 ZO1. 16 from Baseline 46) 73.397 from Baseline 69) Change Change510 ° /°from Baseline 24)from Baseline 47) _ 83 from Baseline 70) Base Year Total First Year Base Year Total Second Year Base Year Total Third Year Total Baseline 13)19816 !)119. , 02$ Settlement 25) 908, 820.1 Total Baseline 36)1 ,908,820. 17 $ Settlement 48) 982 t217.50 Total Baseline 59)Settlement 71) Lump Sum Payment 26 0 Lump Sum Payment 49 0 Lump Sum Payment 72 Applies to education Increase over 0 Increase over 0 Increase over snits only.Baseline 27) %Baseline 50) %Baseline 73) LCER Supplemental Uniform Settlement Reporting Form 116 Date final briefs filed (if applicable) 1'4/ on 117 Date of award (if applicable) 118 Name of county(ies) within which your jurisdiction is located Ramsey 119 Regional development number (if available) city tcer 9/14/94 City of Maplewood 101 Public employer name 102 Contact pperson name _Sherri 103 Phone number of contact person 651- 770 -4527 04 Name of exclusive representativeresentativep LELS #153 105 composition clerical com rehensive, etc.)Unit composition p Police Officers 106 essential or non - essential?Is the unit e Essential 107 Base year calculation date (from BMS Instructions, page 2)12 -31 -98 108 Base y ear employe es (from BMS Instructions, page 2)32 109 mediation requested (if a licableDatemqapplicable)N/A 110 Dat g applicable)Date strike notice given (if a licable N/A 111 Dates of strike (if applicable) 112 Tentative settlement date 12 -21 -98 113 Date arbitration requested (if applicable)N/A 114 Name of arbitrator (if applicable)N/A 115 Date of first arbitration hearing (if applicable)N/A 116 Date final briefs filed (if applicable) 1'4/ on 117 Date of award (if applicable) 118 Name of county(ies) within which your jurisdiction is located Ramsey 119 Regional development number (if available) city tcer 9/14/94 Agenda No. C7' CO` *I* AGENDA REPORT DATE, TO: FROM: February 2, 1999 Mayor and City Council City Manager_ SUBJECT: NON -UNION GENERAL WAGE INCREASE Action by Council Endorse The City is attempting to negotiate multi-year contracts with all bargaining units. A settlement has been reached with the Metro Supervisory Association that calls for a two year contract with a 2% increase retroactive to 1 -1 -99, a I% increase effective 7 -1 -99 and a 3% increase effective 1 -1 -2000. The Sergeants received a 2% increase 1 -1 -99 and will receive an additional 1 % on 7 -1 -99. Their agreement expires 12 -31- 2000. Negotiations with AFSCME are in process. We reached a tentative agreement with the Police Officer's union on December 30, 1998 which was ratified by the members. This agreement contains the same salary adjustments as MSA. We propose to provide the same increase for non -union employees for each year 1999 -2000) so we retain internal equity among the groups. The non -union positions are: City Manager Finance Director Park & Rec Director Emergency Mgmt Dir. Admin. Asst -Pol. Community Ctr Mgr Payroll Technician MIS /GIS Technician Asst. Finance Dir. Assistant to the Manager City Clerk Community Devel Director Asst Emerg Mgmt Director MIS Coordinator Fire Marshal I & II Admin. Asst. -COS Rec. Prgm. Manager Accting Supv. Police Chief Public Works Director Police Captain Fire Chief Executive Secretary Human Resource Director Police Lieutenant Rec. Prgm. Coord. II Public Works Coord. We added a new provision in the MSA agreement allowing employees to convert up to one week of vacation to deferred compensation under certain circumstances. We would also like to offer that option to the non -union employees. RECOMMENDATION WAGES Based on current and proposed settlements with union employees, I recommend that the non - unison employees receive 2% general wage increases retroactive to 1 -1 -99, an additional 1 %increase effective 7 -1 -99 and a 3 %increase effective 1 -1 -2000. VACATION CONVERSION Based on language agreed to by the City and MSA, we propose the following provision for non -union regular employees. On December 1st of each year, full-time and regular part- time employees who are at the three week vacation accrual rate or higher, with a minimum balance of 80 hovers, shall be eligible to convert up to 40 hours of unused vacation time to deferred compensation.. Conversion will be at the employee's current hourly rate as of 12 -01 and will be on the basis of one hour of vacation for one hour of deferred compensation pay. Actual conversion will take place in the second payroll of the following year." This recommendation does not include temporary, seasonal, intermittent, paid -per- call, or casual part time employees. A separate resolution will be presented for Council approval to modify those wages. AGENDA ITEM - & 10 AGENDA REPORT Action b Council: TO: Ken Haider, Cit En Endorsed FROM.- Lance Lundsten, Public W Coordinator Modified Rejected.._.. SUBJECT: Staff car replaceme Date DATE.: Januar 151-1.999 The 1999 capital outla contains an amount of $16,000.00 for fe of a 11988 Chevrolet Corsica (communit Development staff car). Staff has reauested the automobile be replaced with a half -ton 2 wheel drive pick-up, which. is a more. practical. vehicle for their use. "E Chevrolet, of Duluth, has been awarded the state contract to provide these vehicles.. The. cost of the vehicle is $15,265.00 plus sales tax of $992.23, $95.00 license and re and $70.0*0 deliver for a total cost of 1.6,352.23. The 1988 Corsica. will be sold. at the state auction after delivery of the new vehicle. Re Council authorization to: enter into a contract with E Ghevrolet understate contract #421928, for the purchase of a 1999 Chevrolet half-ton 2 Meel drive pick-Up in the -amount of $16,352.23 and -dispose of the 1988 Chevrolet Corsica at state auction. meo r 1 , AGENDA ITEM H.1 AGENDA REPORT Action b ouncil e TO: City Manager Endorse - -• ------ Modified, FROM: Assistant City Engineer Reieeted„ g Dat SUBJECT: Project 98 -12, Pleasantview Park Neighborhood Streets — Public Hearin gandOrderImprovement DATE: February 1, 1999 Staff has held two meetings with the nei hborg hood. On January 11, 1999, the citycouncilacceptedthefeasibilitytudforYythisprojectandorderedthepublichearing toparties.take testimony from the interested g Included in the council agenda ackets are the •p e public hearing booklets with theestimatedamountsproposedtobeassessedforeachproperty. The estimated cost of the project is $283,000. It is proposed that the benefitedpropertiesbeassessedapproximately $121,800 (43 %) of the project costs on abuildableunitbasis. The remainder, $161,200 (57 %) would be contributed by the cityfromgeneralfunds. Staff is prepared to begin with lans and specifications 'p p cations if the council directs the processtocontinue. Staff will hold an open house with the 'neighborhood to discuss the planswhentheyarenearcompletion. When completed,plans shall be brought back to thecouncilfortheirapproval. Staff recommends that the city ouncil approveYppve the attached resolution directingthe . proceed with thecityengineertop final plans for the Pleasantview ParkNeighborhoodStreetImprovementsProject98-12. CIVIC jc Attachments RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 11th day of January, 1999, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed improvement of the Pleasantview Park Neighborhood Streets, City Project 98 -12, AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on February 8, 1999, and the council has heard-7 all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAP LEWOO D, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood improve the Pleasantview Park Neighborhood Streets, City Project 98 -12. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the 8th day of February, 1999. 3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of $283,000 shall be established. The proposed financing plans is as follows: Assessments $121 City contribution 16 Total $283,000 Agenda Item ki MMUUW" MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Design Review – Acorn Mini Storage LOCATION: Highway 61 (old MapleLeaf Drive -in Theater property) DATE: January 13, 1999 b-I'' C INTRODUCTION Project Description uno d ®rse J('odj. ReJect,d ale Mr. Ellis Gottlieb, of the Nationwide Group, is proposing to build a five- building, mini- storage facility on the old MapleLeaf Drive -in Theater site. Refer to the maps and drawings on pages 8 -12. Mr. Gottlieb has submitted a thorough narrative explaining this proposal. Refer to pages 13 -22. In summary, this facility would consist of five buildings. Buildings A, B and E would be built in the first phase of construction in the spring of 1999. Buildings C and D would be built as the market demands, perhaps over the next three to five years. Building C would be added onto the north side of Building B. Refer to the site plan (separate attachment). The proposed building sizes would be as follows: Building A 3,600 square feet, 1 -story Building B — 34,000 square feet, 2 -story Building C - 35,400 square feet, 2 -story Building D -- 5,600 square feet, 1 -story Building E — 4,200 square feet, 1 -story The proposed buildings would have exteriors of rock -face concrete block and standing -seam roof- fascia panels. Buildings B and C, the 2 -story buildings, would also have windows. The north elevation of Building B would be finished with rock -face block and windows in case the future addition, Building C, is not built. Outdoor Storage Mr. Gottlieb, proposes to provide outdoor storage on a temporary basis in the areas denoted for Buildings C and D. He explained that this is at the neighbors' request since some have RVs and boats they may wish to store there. Requests 1. Approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) because the westerly building would be 218 feet from the residential property to the rear. Code requires a CUP for buildings in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district that would be'closer than 350 feet to a residential district. 2. Approval of building design, site and landscape plans. BACKGROUND December 23, 1996: The city council granted a CUP for Heartland Industries to operate a shed -sales business from this site. The council also waived the lawn - irrigation requirement and approved the site plan. Refer to the minutes on page 26. Shed -Sales CUP No Longer Valid Section 36 -444 of the city code states that "the proposed construction (for a CUP) must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void." Heartland Industries did not begin their shed -sales operation within the first year, nor did they request or obtain a one -year time extension. This CUP, therefore, is no longer in effect. DISCUSSION Conditional Use Permit This proposal meets the requirements for a CUP. This project would have little effect on the adjacent single - family homes to the west due to the 218 -foot setback to the closest building. This facility would also screen and buffer the houses from the highway which would be an advantage. The adjacent neighbors, furthermore, have shown their support of this project at informational meetings the applicant has hosted. Building Design The proposed buildings would be attractive and the applicant has met with the neighbors several times to assure that they would be satisfied with the view from their homes. Mr. Gottlieb stated that he gave the neighbors the option to select building colors. He said they have not done so yet, but they would like to see beige or brown tones. Landscaping and Screening The site should be sufficiently screened by the proposed trees and shrubs as well as by the back wall of Building E. There are also two clumps of trees on the westerly side of the site that would provide additional screening. One is on the west side of the existing pond; the other is south of this first stand of trees. It would be advantageous to preserve these trees for screening purposes if the grading limits allow. The city code requires in- ground lawn irrigation. The applicant should provide this in the front and sides of Building A. The city code requires that the applicant replace quality trees that are eight inches or more in caliper. Poor - quality trees like box elders, cottonwoods and poplar are exempt. The code requires that these trees be replaced up to a density of 10 trees per acre. It is not possible to tell what all the tree varieties are at this time and some may be dead. The applicant should provide a tree survey before getting a building permit which evaluates the types and sizes of trees on the site to determine code compliance and to see if additional trees are needed. 2 Parking The city code does not give a parking requirement for mini - storage facilities. Staff agrees with the applicant that the number of spaces they are proposing should adequately serve their needs. In the event a shortage develops, however, the city could require that the applicant add more spaces. Driveway Encroachment There is an existing driveway for Zuercher Well Drilling that overlaps the applicant's site. The applicant plans to remove the encroaching portion of this driveway from his site and sod the area. Mr. Gottlieb will, however, allow a slight encroachment of Mr. Zuercher's driveway next to Mr. Zuercher's building to allow him access around the building. Staff has no objection to this as long as the two neighbors agree. Refer to the letter and enlarged site detail on pages 27 -28. Wetland Boundary and Drainage Considerations The applicant is proposing to provide a pretreatment pond to hold storm runoff before discharge into the existing pond. The city engineer has reviewed this plan and accepted them on a preliminary basis. The final plans should be reviewed upon building permit submittal. The city's wetland maps designate the wetland on the site as a Class -5 Wetland. The code does not require a wetland buffer easement. The applicant should, however, dedicate a drainage easement over the wetland and pretreatment pond as a condition of this CUP. COMMISSION ACTIONS January 4, 1998: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP. January 13,1999: The community design review board recommended approval of the building design, site and landscape plans. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adapt the resolution on pages 29 -30 approving a conditional use permit for a mini - storage facility on the west side of Highway 61 on the old Maplel-eaf Drive -in Theater site. This permit is needed because one of the buildings.would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district. The city bases the approval on the findings required by code and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city date - stamped November 25, 1998. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 3 4. The city council may require additional parking in the future if the council determines that there is a need for additional parking on the site. 5. Outdoor storage is permitted on the area proposed for Building C, provided it is screened from the west and north by a six - foot -tall decorative screening fence. The outdoor storage in this area shall be reevaluated when Building C is proposed for construction. 6. The applicant shall dedicate a drainage easement over all wetland areas and the proposed pretreatment pond, subject to the city engineers approval. 7. The hours of operation shall be as proposed by the applicant on page 19 of the staff report. 8. The lighting on the north and south sides of the site shall be post - mounted and shine toward the site. B. Approve. the site plan date - stamped November 25, 1998, the landscape plans date - stamped January 12, 1999, the building elevations date- stamped December 2, 1998 and the site lighting and civil drawings date - stamped December 2, 1998 for the Acorn Mini - Storage Facility on the west side of Highway 61 on the old MapleLeaf Drive -in Theater site, based on the findings required by the code. The property owner shall: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Provide the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit: a. A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval. The erosion control plan shall comply with ordinance requirements. The existing cast - iron sanitary sewer pipe, which served the old house on the property, shall be severed and terminated at the street right -of -way. b. A tree survey identifying quality trees on the site that are eight inches or more in caliper. Staff may require additional trees for code compliance. c. A building -color scheme consisting of neutral colors. d. A fence design plan for the screening fence around the outdoor storage area. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction. b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. Restore and seed or sod any and all disturbed ground such as the areas of blacktop removal and the future building pads for Buildings C and D. Remove all old driveway entrances and restore with sod. c. Install a handicap - parking sign for the handicap - parking space. 51 d. Screen all roof - mounted equipment visible from adjacent residential properties. Such equipment visible on non - residential sides must be painted to match the building. e. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure if there will be any outdoor storage of refuse. The enclosures must match the building in color and materials. There must be a closeable gate that is 100% opaque. f. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all lawn areas on the front and sides of Building A. g. Provide site - security lighting that is directed or shielded so not to cause any lighting nuisance for adjacent property owners or drivers. 4. if any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives cash escrow for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by .tune 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six kAteeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5. Comply with any requirements of MnDot for access to the frontage road. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 7. There shall not be any outdoor storage permitted in the area designated for Building D. 5 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 4.46 acres Existing land use: undeveloped SURROUNDING LAND USES North:Zuercher Well Drilling South:'Northernaire Motel West:Single dwellings East:Highway 61 PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: M -1 (light manufacturing) Zoning: M -1 Ordinance Requirements Section 36- 187(b) states that no building or exterior use, except parking, may be erected, altered or constructed within 350 feet of a residential district without a CUP. Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council must base approval of a CUP on nine standards for approval. Refer to findings one through nine in the resolution on pages 29-30. Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. 0 p:sec9lacorn.2 Attachments: It. Location Map 2. Proper; Ix:°!?oning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Building Elevation Reductions (2 pages) 6. Applicant's Narrative of Project Description (10 pages) 6. Applicant's Conditional Use Permit Justification (3 pages} 7. December 23, 1996 Council Minutes (Shed Sales CUP) 8. Letter to Al Zuercher dated December 24, 1998 (2 pages) 9. CUP Resolution (2 pages) 10. Site Plan date - stamped November 26, 1998 (separate attachment) 11 Building Elevations riate- stamp?erd De-cQrnber 2, 1998 (separate attachment) 12. Civil Drawings date - stamped December 2, 1998 (separate attachment) 13. Landscape Plan date - stamped January 12, 1999 (separate attachment) 7 Attachment 1 Cu N 2 Q W ~< cr U Gervis Kohirno L oke W -OKe J COJN CIR @ OC DO PA , • LLE :R h aR 6 -7 , CONNOR C AvE 1 ---- J DE VO~. A VE 6 - c'BROOK i o C. < x'aN AVE 11 ' f 4 I 0 3 N J I KOrMAti A.VE ' T i Z ROAD BOA V) Cr v f ,L v f CT IN NOR O OF G E Rv A. S A - VE A . SEX TAti ff Q GER`•'AS G'.NO: w A i Poo LO Q COUN RD. D Q i v VIKING DR. V o 5 Uj 34.0 tr '-- -- PG 2 I t i. SUvM CT. CoUtigYVlCA c;R. . UTH 4 'v. 3. D; CT. ; 4 iYO ST N 6 B EAM A vT Of 109 BEAM Cu N 2 Q W ~< cr U Gervis Kohirno L oke W -OKe J COJN CIR @ OC DO PA , • LLE :R h aR 6 -7 , CONNOR C AvE 1 ---- J DE VO~. A VE 6 - c'BROOK i o C. < x'aN AVE 11 ' f 4 I 0 3 N J I KOrMAti A.VE ' T i Z ROAD BOA V) Cr v f ,L v f CT IN NOR O OF G E Rv A. S A - VE A . SEX TAti ff Q GER`•'AS G'.NO: w A i Poo LO tZ V c r'R. SHERR; N ASE i N N r "_ f K • u C COPE i L. I :ARK CT. 4 ' + I C e -, AVLK O < _ ~ nLakeoCO. RD v v .4URIE L.E,.AN C RD. v` c SAND U R S' i i .!UNCTION I AYE. `.. = B 0 O pv 9i 1 B J R K E A' O R J (1) AVE. m CRAM 6c5SToQ Mp f ELDR ' JG E AVE 3 F I 0 ti i %-N IN i ARSE W lNE. ! BELMOtiT f AVE. 0 +, R GO C SKILL E. SKILL MAN AVE. SH16 R,e,ooc I ! ; C RYA t, Aorx Rvi AN I A v. t FROST _ W0 W . LOCATION MAP 1*01 4 N v VIKING DR.5 o lAURfE CT. t/1 V)O to C.L. Y 9URKE CT. I o N BJRKE AV rpGE 5D A !E. o ELDRIJGE AV LN.W Oehrtine N BELO LA,Lake SKILLMAN AV. KENW 000 Y Ir N I ® O W 3 Off. LN . ERNON m W m Z Av' O ROSFLA* a o -- tZ V c r'R. SHERR; N ASE i N N r "_ f K • u C COPE i L. I :ARK CT. 4 ' + I C e -, AVLK O < _ ~ nLakeoCO. RD v v .4URIE L.E,.AN C RD. v` c SAND U R S' i i .!UNCTION I AYE. `.. = B 0 O pv 9i 1 B J R K E A' O R J (1) AVE. m CRAM 6c5SToQ Mp f ELDR ' JG E AVE 3 F I 0 ti i %-N IN i ARSE W lNE. ! BELMOtiT f AVE. 0 +, R GO C SKILL E. SKILL MAN AVE. SH16 R,e,ooc I ! ; C RYA t, Aorx Rvi AN I A v. t FROST _ W0 W . LOCATION MAP 1*01 4 N Attachment 2 L C ICON N 3 X32. 5 00. O.L. , 2 r 32:e1 B MAPLEWOOD s s r00 • ` — -- -- — — — —INDUSTRIAL - L 13 2. -' 3 56K . - PARK - 13 .67 tj r , r. s . 75. 2 103"%' a , scam) N1A L A 2522 u y / ti cqG , w ESTz -------- - - - - -- j 11G. o t So &C p 3t.e7 0 S s/ 2497 2514 -47) h - •j f: 3 0 c f 4 l:32. °I '3`.'`o 2 so 2 w ZUERCHER 2506 so _ • • - L45) c6z WELL DRILLING °e a 7 e o g 3 2498 O 1 44) 731 2490 13 1 150) v « 7Q)4 ; 24 90 t E ..ia.sc • •sa W 1 • PROPOSED SITE - QWQ12482 w J32_ 7 tai• O 13G. O • 11 S i474 • o o. o 70W .L) 6 $ . P`, 24644 c sz 10 V 1 vo. so 134.50 cs3 8 177y 24 6 46 Z15L ACy / 5 7A • . T.d X . 13 •E X 64) AVE a 02458 2q., ' '' °° '' ( a •`' NORTHERNAIRE ', • ; 2444 N 15 a4 ' El MOTEL t SMILEY'S - — -- r ' r CtiI2•6 1032 ` " " .•• ; G O • , " 1024 t . DG BURGERS , ' 2416- w` v N SUNSET REALTY .Y CoEl - r WAREHOUSE 24 yo 33 AVE- a ce•e'` -L ......,, K - ...ltd ., - _ _ 608.E ' • •, - / :_ 3 *c 9sc o 00 ir 4-T J wy ; 0 . !r• n • O • M,riLI.aes 91 Ci •: PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 N Attachment 3 L Cw"D O/NTMG 0"".Sa ro" DRNWUT SA&D"M Flews FO UP [ R WC. 244=4 AT DIST ' T fA^^" OtNTM1G ReplovC Ot19TO4 0'-0' KtTWC IROq . •t kViO40 A DRW[ TY Lot—FIST w w L * tid _ 1 I w : ao 1 20 t o° 1 ~: WETLAND i D . r. 1 2-2- 1170" TO .wop b I ® . t to.s 9 i it SPACES 86M W 1 1 •. OW •.r: i i . MAIM 1 ar+ tea+ / • I / 2 Foci 9x FT V OnfTtlr. DOlr1 I TR[t• • !D -0' 'D.C. i . •'., per• 1 1 / TtORART i 6Ojw) /•i rf a , A/TfrOt ARXJW. ' NTyrr+01J. W 6010.. *PACs/ PWASs 1) 10tM RLtApM •1'17'Y' T P/TRANCI GAT[i 7f- cabc- cum (TT•) e+ta SITE PLAN 10 4 N p 5LDG. 'A' EAST ELEVATION RE-FINIS"VED MWIM IMDZ CAV EAVE OtOCKFA449NOKAL k F.Ir.a. T - W -7 WAXA.-LPP STAMD#M MCCF PAP EAVE (LOW) R cmu - F.F.E. Ro"-LOP DOOM (Tyr BLDG. EAST ELEVATION STUL. JAM AND LWT9L (TYP.) BLDG, 'A' NORTH ELEV. WALE, We- - I--*- kzlr: 1kL7r--;EIz: 5LDG. 'A' SOUTH ELEV. N12 BLDG. WEST ELEVATION BLDG. ICI EAST/WEST ELEVATION Wk". we. — I.-• t-,%\ 5LDG. IC NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATION LW SCA.F.I/s, — 1'-0• BLDG. V t4ORTH/SOUTW ELEVATION RIF; 7 ui Z f ii w . C+ C+ CD C • BI—DG. 'A' WEST ELEVATION W.-LE• 1/6• 11-W V r. N ME fi W— 2 ft nxm4,7 w JOS r N ...Yl.wr KIa Wh Yi4YMiY Oii1M..- .. MYNYt'/ ,1w.M r Q IY. V• Y'WrO BLDG. WEST ELEVATION BLDG. ICI EAST/WEST ELEVATION Wk". we. — I.-• t-,%\ 5LDG. IC NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATION LW SCA.F.I/s, — 1'-0• BLDG. V t4ORTH/SOUTW ELEVATION RIF; 7 ui Z f ii w . C+ C+ CD C • BI—DG. 'A' WEST ELEVATION W.-LE• 1/6• 11-W e il Attachment 5 BACKGROUND The purpose of this background paper is to outline our plans for a proposed phased mini storage facility in Maplewood. Nationwide Group, the developer, has secured an option for a property along the west side of Highway 61, north of Highway 36 having a street address of 2457 -71 Maplewood Drive. The site is the former Maple Leaf Drive -In Theater site. This 4.46 -acre site is currently zoned M1 which allows for the development of a variety of commercial /industrial /warehouse and other uses. Many of these allowed uses could produce substantially higher traffic counts, have longer operating hours and could have a much more dramatic impact on the surrounding area than the proposed mini storage development. Nationwide has been working with the City and the neighborhood to design an attractive, responsible project with minimal impacts. THE DEVELOPER; NATIONWIDE GROUP Nationwide Group is a Minneapolis based real estate development and property management company. Nationwide manages approximately 940 -units of residential housing as well as four Acorn Mini Storage facilities which it developed and continues to own. Douglas M. Head founded Nationwide Group in 1972 and has extensive experience in real estate development and property management. Mr. Head was a member of the Minnesota House of Representatives and served as Attorney General for the State of Minnesota. His public sector experience and commitment for excellence were used to help shape the company he founded and still manages. Nationwide operates Acorn Mini Storage facilities at 8625 SW Point Douglas in Cottage Grove, 2547 5th St NE in Minneapolis, 2935 Lexington Ave in Eagan, and 4652 Lyndale Ave. N. in Minneapolis. Nationwide has been developing and managing mini storage facilities for well over a decade. During this time we have learned many things, perhaps the most important being that a successful development must address the needs and concerns of the surrounding neighbors. We have made every effort to involve the adjoining neighbors in the process and look forward to working with them on outstanding issues. 13 2 MINI STORAGE CONCEPT Mini storage, also known as self storage, refers to facilities which offer individual storage units rented on a month -to -month or short-term basis. Customers bring their own items to the facility and place them into the rented unit which the customer controls through their own lock and key. These units can either be unheated or heated. Heated units are generally referred to as climate controlled. Prior to the storage industry going self service the storage need was partially fulfilled by warehouses operated by moving and storage companies. These warehouses provide protection against burglary, however, the customer was charged for inventorying and handling of goods. If the customer desired to access their goods, they were charged an additional fee. In comparison, the self service storage concept offers convenient storage while offering the consumer substantial cost savings for their efforts. Self storage units are very popular with individuals for the storage of furniture and personal belongings. Businesses use the units for storage of inventory, equipment trade fixtures and business records. CLIMATE CONTROLLED SPACE Heated or climate controlled space refers to self storage units which benefit from a controlled environment which eliminates the extremes of very cold, hot or humid weather. They maintain a temperature range of about 50 degrees to 80 degrees, and a humidity range of 30 percent to 60 percent. This type of unit is popular with businesses seeking to store files, companies and individuals storing electronic equipment or computer files and persons who wish to avoid the temperature extremes when visiting their stored goods. A portion of the second floor of Building B will contain climate controlled space. OUTSIDE STORAGE Outside storage is not an essential part of our business. Some neighbors have expressed an interest in outside storage as a place to park their boats and RVs. We do not plan on offering this type of storage unless approved by the city and the neighbors. If permitted we would ask that outside storage for boats and RVs be allowed on a temporary basis in areas reserved for Buildings C & D. Once these building were built the outside storage would be eliminated. Outside storage could be granted under a Conditional Use Permit which could be revoked at any time if the neighbors were not satisfied with our ability to screen this type of use. 14 3 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Development plans call for a phased development. At build out we anticipate a total of 500 to 600 units. The project would consist of four buildings, three of which would be one - story. The two -story building would be set -back from the residential homeowners. The side of the building facing the homeowners would be constructed on architectural masonry with no openings. This one -story building would also serve to screen the other buildings in the development. Phase I which could be constructed as early as the spring of 1999 would consist of Buildings A, B and E. All landscaping would be done in conjunction with Phase I. Phase II (Buildings C & D) would be built when demand warrants. Perhaps over the following three to five years. SECURITY The issue of security is as important to us as it is to the neighborhood. It is perhaps the most important aspects of the mini storage business. If customers do not have confidence in the facility they will not rent space from us. Some survey results show consumers place a greater emphasis on security over price. When designed properly mini storage facilities are as safe and secure as other types of developments. Our Cottage Grove facility which has similar demographics to the proposed Maplewood site has never had abreak -in in recent memory despite the fact that it does not have astate -of -the -art security system as proposed for this facility. SECURITY POLICIES &MEASURES Our company invests heavily in security equipment which when combined with our security measures produces the highest possible level of security. Having been in the mini storage business for over a decade, we have gained valuable insight into these security methods. A sampling of our security program is summarized below: Every customer is required to show a valid form of photo identification before we will enter into a lease. A copy of the customer's photo ID is kept in our permanent file. This process discourages persons with bad intentions from renting space as they know their photo ID is on record. The facility will have astate -of -the -art video surveillance system with at least eight closed circuit cameras tied into a 170 -hour VCR recorder. 15 4 Cameras are placed to document all activities. A security camera in the office lets customers know we take security seriously. The office will have a security system continuously monitored by Floyd security services. An electronic front gate tied into a computer keeps a permanent record of each tenant's activities showing the time each customer entered and left the facility. The electronic gate prohibits unauthorized persons from gaining access to the grounds. The electronic gate will be programmed to prohibit anyone, even customers, from gaining access to the facility after hours. Vacant units are kept locked. This practice discourages thieves from checking out what they think are units which customers forgot to lock. The perimeter of the facility will be lit after dark. Special sodium lighting is used to prevent any light and glare spilling onto adjacent properties. Perhaps the most effective, and expensive, security measure is individual door alarms. Each unit will have its own alarm which will me monitored 24 -hors a day by a professional security system. In the event of a break -in the police will be notified immediately. As a professional company we are constantly implementing the latest security techniques including retrofitting existing facilities. Our managers receive constant training in security measures. They make daily inspections of the property and monitor all activities within the facility. TRAFFIC According to Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) literature, mini storage generates significantly less traffic than other uses permitted in the MI zone. To better address the issue of traffic we researched traffic counts from our mini storage facility in Minneapolis. This facility is located on a Highway 94. During the studied period the site averaged 29.3 cars per day. With 376 storage 16 5 units the daily traffic number can also be referenced as 7.8 cars per 100 units. The facility averaged only 28 cars per Saturday and 21 cars per Sunday. This average daily number of 7.8 vehicles per 100 units is consistent with traffic counts supplied by the national mini storage association. Equally as important as total traffic generation are peak period trips between the hours of 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM on weekdays. Our peak period traffic at the Minneapolis facility averages just under 5 cars per day. A nominal portion of the total traffic count would come from moving trucks. The number of trucks entering the facility per month is substantially lower than the truck traffic a warehouse of manufacturing use would generate. TRAFFIC COMPARISON The proposed facility will generate far less traffic than other uses allowed in the M1 zone. The following table compares our estimated traffic numbers to those in the ITE book. Peak Trigs Daily Trigs Proposed Mini Storage 600 -Units (Developer Est.)7 48 50,000 SF Manufacturing 25 121 50,000 SF Office Building 130 500+ 35,000 SF Sports Club 45+400+ 25,000 SF Hardware Store 80+500+ 25,000 SF Medical/Dental Clinic 100 600+ DESIGN ELEMENTS Architectural design is an important issue for the City, and for us. We believe an attractive building makes good sense. It tells the customers we are committed to our business and it tells the community we are a good neighbor. 17 0 Access would be from the southeastern property edge. The front setback will have a 30 to 60 foot wide landscaped area. Building A which faces Highway 61 will not have any doors visible from the highway. The wall facing the highway will be of architectural block with design elements including medallions and columns. This building will serve to screen the doors along the east side of Buildings B & Co The two -story building (Buildings B& C) have been set -back 400 feet from the rear property line. The two -story building will be screened by a one- story building (Building E) with a block wall. This building has been designed to look more like an office building and contains many architectural details including columns, glass, medallions and split - block. Customer parking was designed so that all autos are screened from the view of the residents. The notch in building B screens the parking area. Building E will not have any doors facing the residents. This one -story building will also serve to screen the doors on Building B from the view of the residents. Design features for the rear of the building will mirror those of Building A. LANDSCAPING Our proposed Landscaping Plan includes trees every 30 feet along the rear property line. Bushes along the west wall of Building E will serve to compliment the trees and further screen the property. The existing pond will remain in place. The existing bituminous within the rear 218 feet of the property will be removed and replaced with natural ground cover. We believe this investment shows our commitment to the neighborhood as well as our desire to develop a first class facility. All landscaping will be maintained by the project and we are prepared to submit a landscaping bond ensuring these improvements are made. We would like the adjoining neighbors to help in the selection and location of the proposed trees and bushes along the west portion of the property. 18 7 NEIGHBORHOOD INVOLVEMENT Our commitment to the neighborhood includes designing a project which reflects the needs and concerns of the neighborhood. We used these meetings to design a project which is acceptable to the neighbors and compliments the area. Following are some highlights from this meeting which were incorporated into the proposed design. These items being subject to city approval. 1) The adjacent neighbors will be allowed to select the roof color for any roofs visible to any adjacent neighbor. 2) The adjacent neighbors will be allowed to approve all lighting within 250 feet of the rear property line. In no event will any lighting be allowed to spill over to the neighbors. 3) Gate hours will be: Monday - Friday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Saturday - Sunday 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM 4) Office hours will be: Monday - Friday 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM Saturday 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM Sunday Closed 5) The adjoining neighbors will be allowed to select building colors for the buildings facing them. 6) The adjoining neighbors will be allowed to select the door colors for all doors facing them. 7) The facility will not have any outside public address system. 8) The facility will not have anyone living on -site. This will prevent late night traffic onto the site. 9) All blacktopping within 215 feet of the rear property line will be removed and seeded with natural ground cover. 10) The adjoining neighbors will be allowed to select the type and location of the trees and shrubs at the rear of the property from the options supplied by Nationwide. 19 8 10) The facility will have individual silent door alarms monitored by a private security firm. 11) Electronic gates will be used to restrict customer access after hours. 12) The two -story building shall be no less than 400 feet from the rear property line as shared with the neighbors. 13) Building D, the building closest to the neighbors, shall be no less than 215 feet from the rear property line. 14) Building D will be constructed as part of Phase I so as to provide screening. 15) The pond and wetland shall remain in place. 16) The existing trees and berm along the rear property line will not be touched. 17) The neighbors may, or may not, allow outside storage depending on our ability to screen the vehicles from the view of the neighbors. 18) Iron ornamental fencing will be used along the front of the property. 19) Vinyl coated fencing will be used along all other areas. The neighbors may select the color of this fencing. 20) A state -of -the -art security will be installed including: A minimum of eight security cameras; A 170 -hour VCR to record the camera's activities; An electronic gate programmed to restrict access hours; A computerized system which can track and record all persons entering and exiting the site; and, An alarmed office monitored 24 -hours per day. 21) Strict security procedures will be observed. 22) Customer parking areas will be screened from the residents. 23) The two -story building will be set back from the adjacent homeowners. 20 REFERENCES During Nationwide's 25 -year history we have earned a reputation of developing and managing quality projects. This includes working closely with cities and residents in the design process. We encourage you to contact other city officials to learn more about how we developed responsible mini storage facilities. Cottage Grove: John Burbank, Planner: 458 -2825 Minneapolis: Van Vorhis, Zoning Inspector: 673 -5813 Eagan: Mike Ridley, Planner: 681 -4690 Nationwide would be pleased to arrange for a tour of our facilities so you could see our facilities for yourself. WHERE DO CUSTOMERS COME FRO A facility as proposed will draw heavily from the immediate area. It is reasonable to forecast that anywhere from 90 to 95 %, or more, of all customers will originate from within five -miles of the site. Our business centers around homeowners and local businesses. We do not cater to "transient" business. It is our experience that transients do not have a need, nor can they afford, mini storage. The majority (70 %) of our customers are local homeowners that are seeking to store excess furniture, tools or records. They typically rent for nine to twelve months and visit the site every three months. Some of our customers are store their goods while they are moving remodeling their homes or building new homes. About 30% of our business comes from local businesses seeking to store goods, records and merchandise. Many of these merchants are small businesses such as plumbers and electricians. CUSTOMER PARKING Based on our twelve year's of experience in operating mini storage we have a good understanding of parking requirements. A facility of this size and type will require no more than five customer parking stalls. Because the city code requires substantially more parking we will request a variance. SUMMARY Since the site is actively being marketed it is safe to say the site will be developed in the future. Under the Ml zone a variety of uses are allowed which would not require a project to address local concerns. These potential developments could also have extended hours of operations along with traffic counts some four to 18 21 10 times greater than that of the proposed development. Furthermore, the neighbors may not have the same degree of input as to screening, landscaping or design. Acorn Mini Storage represents a responsible development option which addresses the needs and concerns of the community: Minimal traffic generation; An attractively designed facility with upgraded building materials; Extensively landscaped areas; Screening of buildings and parking areas; A facility designed with safety in mind; A two -story building which has been set -back. A source of real estate taxes; Limited operating hours; and, A developer that is committed to work with the neighborhood. CONTACT PERSON Should you have any comments or questions or should you desire a tour of our existing facilities, please feel to contact: Ellis Gottlieb, Vice President Nationwide Group 512 -7720 22 11 Attachment 6 1 11 J . t XOV 2-.5 199 NATIONWID GROUP 1724 Douglas Drive North 0 Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 612.512.7720 0 FAX 612.512.7723 November 24,1998 Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: PROPOSED ACORN MINI STORAGE HIGHWAY 61, MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA SUBMITTAL Dear Mr. Ekstrand: Nationwide Group is pleased to submit its application for a proposed Acorn Mini Storage facility to be located along the west side of State Trunk Highway number 61 on the 4.46 -acre property havin g an address of 2457/71 Maplewood Drive. The site is presently undeveloped as was formerly a portion of the Maple Leaf Drive -In Theater site. Our application submittal contains the following: Landscaping Plan Site Plan Exterior Elevations Project Description Package City Fees Geotechnical Report Mailing List Boundary & Topo Survey We are requesting city approval to construct the phased mini storage development as shown on the attached plans and as detailed in the attached literature. 1) The property is currently zoned M 1 a designation which allows for mini storage. Surrounding uses are consistent with this zoning. The proposed development is consistent with the comprehensive plan, zoning and surrounding uses. In fact, the proposed use has 23 significantly less impacts than almost any other use allowed under the M1 designation. Most impacts have been eliminated or mitigated to fullest extend possible. 2) The proposed use would not change the character of the surrounding character of the area. We have hosted several neighborhood meetings to discuss our development plans and to incorporate the neighbors suggestions and requests into our plans. We believe we have strong neighborhood support for the proposed project as a result of our efforts. 3) The use will not depress property values. As a developer of mini storage facilities for the past decade we are not aware of any re sponsibly designed mini storage facility which has depressed property values. The nearly two -acre undeveloped area bordering the residential area will adequately screen the property from the residential area. Our building materials and design may in fact set a new design standard for the area. Several residents have remarked that the landscaping in conjunction with the set -backs and the blocking of noise from Highway 61 will be an improvement to the area. 4) The use and operation of the facility will not create or involve any activity, process, equipment that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance. Because the proposed use is for storage, and not manufacturing, there will be no smoke, odor, fumes, pollution, vibration, electrical interference or demand on utilities. The on -site pond will be used for water run -off. The building materials and design will ensure an attractive and complimentary facility. By limiting access to the site we can minimize any noise. Placing low - output screened lighting fixtures no less than 250 feet from the neighbors will eliminate any light and glare spilling into the neighbors. As an established operator of mini storage facilities we invite to tour any of our properties to see how we operate and maintain our investments. We sincerely believe the building materials, design and techniques will result in the nicest looking project in the area and will set new standards for not only the mini storage industry but for other types of industrial developments. 5) At buildout the use would generate less than vehicle 50 trips per day with less than 10 peak -period trips. This is dramatically less than almost any other type of use. In fact it could be anywhere from 50% to 90% less than most other allowed uses. 6) With no on -site living quarters and limited office hours our gas and water requirements are minimal. During daylight hours our second floor lighting is regulated by timers on switches which are activated by customers. The one -story building have no daytime lighting. Water run -off will be handled by an on -site pond. N 24 The nature of the operation coupled with our state -of -the -art security measures is forecast to place no additional burden on the police or fire departments. The facility will not generate any demand on the school or park system. 7. The proposed use will not create a burden on any public facilities or services. 8. The site will have significant set -backs in the front and especially in the rear of the property.The rear of the site has over 86,304 SF (1.98- acres) of undeveloped area. This alone represents 44% of the entire site. 9. The ro osed facility has been designed, and will be operated, so as to negate any adverseppY impacts. We are further requesting the city grant us a parking variance based on the nature of the development. Our experience, and that of the entire mini storage business, suggests that less that six customer parking spaces are required for this size development. By limiting the number of parking spaces we can design a more attractive development with more landscaped areas. Please free to contact me at 612.512.7720 with any comments or questions you may have. Sincerely, ELLIS GOTTLIEB Vice President 3 25 Attachment 7. hall follow the site1. All construction s plan approved by the City. TheP Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. construction must be substantially started within one year of 2. The proposed Council approval permit shall become null and void. The y pp or the p Council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. 4. If there is not enough parking, the operator or property owner shall provide more spaces. The City staff must approve a plan before paving begins. 5. The operator shall keep the lawn mowed on this site. 6. The number of shed garagessandes shall not exceed the number shown on the g site plan. 7. Provide a portable bathroom on site for customers and sales persons. conditional use permit granted on December 23, 1996 will expire on 8. The co P December 31, 2001. The Council hereby establishes a 5-year amortization period on this conditional use permit. Seconded b Councilmember Carlson Ayes . all In- Ground Lawn Irrigation Waiver lire 8Na 0 2-0 • • l•• •• Tel Seconded b y Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all Design Approval h. Mayor Bastian L77V vf u "u a.F% i Hi ghwa"l on- the- ol d __ m r%l al oaf D -In Theater Drapextv. subjec t he- a i cant doi n -the fol I ow 1) Complete the following items or provide cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City to guarantee the completion of the following things before the first shed is placed or constructed on the site: a) Install a 24- foot -wide bituminous driveway and parking lot for four cars (one must be handicap - accessible as required by the ADA- Americans with Disabilities Act). This driveway shall follow the alignment of the southerly part of the existing gravel driveway. b) Provide parking lot striping including cross - hatching an eight - foot -wide handicap - parking access -aisle and installation of a handicap - parking sign. c) Install site security lighting. 26 12 -23 -96 Attachment 8 20' d 14101 NA IONWID OU-C 1724 Doughy Drive North 0 Golden 'Valley, Minnesota 5 '• '2 612.512.7720 0 FAX 612.512.7 723 December 24,1998 Mr. Al Zuercher 2483 N. Highway 81 St Paul, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Zuercher: Nationwide Group is advancing its efforts to acquire and develop the property I mmediately south of you. 1 understand that you have an easement over a portion of this property which may be canceled by either party upon 6.6 -days notice. In our previous conversations you indicated that the existing easement mad% be reconfigured. Please find enclosed a site plan which shows the revised easement -Area highlig in yellow. The red line indicates the position of the proposed fence. The revised easement area extends approximately 8 feet into the property we are seeking to acquire. Please call me at 612.512.7720 so that we may discuss further. Sincerely, ELLI S GOTTLI EB Vice President c: Gerry Herringer 5150 Central Ave NE Mpls MN 55421 1 27 20 ' d L9zt? SEE Z T 9 dnoNg 9G I MN0 I idN L0 : 9 T 066 Z - eZ -09Q N%i- COATIEED 7. 1. C 4 IN L 1 NK F E IN Cw' C= F— MOVOE. FENCE UP TO I T 1 Nr,.o GARB la"NT E.Y.15`7. GARAGE -- GA R. w PROFERTY LINE --"- .-. f . a N SAMEMW-qL- R.O%e-#K NITAIP • tor I'CIzoadL9zv822ZT9dnM103GIMNOIiUNLO:9T 666 T — 8 Z— "--" -t Attachment 9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ellis Gottlieb, of the Nationwide Group, applied for a conditional use permit to build a mini - storage facility in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district closer than 350 feet to a residential district. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property to the north of 2441 Highway 61. The legal description is: PARCEL 1: LOT 2 W. H. HOWARD'S GARDEN LOTS, EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 221 FEET THEREOF AND EXCEPT THE SOUTHERLY 90 FEET THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY 221 FEET, SUBJECT TO HIGHWAY. PARCEL 2: THE SOUTHERLY 90 FEET LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY 221 FEET OF LOT 2 W. H. HOWARD'S GARDEN LOTS, SUBJECT TO RIGHTS ACQUIRED BY STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES; AND THE WESTERLY 221 FEET OF LOT 2, W. H. HOWARD'S GARDEN LOTS. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On January 4, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by taw. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. wt 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city date - stamped November 25, 1998. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The city council may require additional parking in the future if the council determines that there is a need for additional parking on the site. 5. Outdoor storage is permitted on the area proposed for Building C, provided it is screened from the west and north by a six - foot -tall decorative screening fence. The outdoor storage in this area shall be reevaluated when Building C is proposed for construction. 6. The applicant shall dedicate a drainage easement over all wetland areas and the proposed pretreatment pond, subject to the city engineer's approval. 7. The hours of operation shall be as proposed by the applicant on page 19 of the staff report. 8. The lighting on the north and south sides of the site shall be post - mounted and shine toward the site. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1999. 30 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA JANUARY 4, 1999 IV. NEW BUSINESS A. Acorn Mini - Storage Conditional Use Permit (West Side of Highway 61) Ken Roberts associate p lanner, presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts said,, in Maplewood, any outdoor storage must be approved by conditional use permit in any zoning district. He added that there is no specific. requirements and screening is subject to the conditions of the CUP. Commissioner Rossbach asked if ordinances dealing with lighting of an area and lights spilling Over unto other areas a lied Onl to those areas abutting residential. Mr. Roberts said theppY ordinance was for all commercial. Commissioner Rossbach questioned the condition ,relating to the requirement for additional was deemed necessary in the future because there is no place to put additionalparkingifitrY p g .arkin Mr. Roberts pointed out that parking would be available on the land where Buildings Cp and D will be built later. If the whole site is built as shown, there would no t be room for more parking. . He noted that there are at least two other mini- storage facilities along the north side of Highway 36 which have about four to six spaces at each one for additional parking. The city hasgy not received any complaints on these sites. If there is a de monstrated need for additional parkingarkin on the first buildings, before the, last one is built, Mr. Roberts said a change may be required to the building plan. Ellis Gottlieb, of Nationwide Group, answered some of the questions raised by the commission. He said Building A would act as a buffer between the parking and Highway 61. There would be a setback of 576 feet from the west property line to this screened area. Mr. Gottlieb pointed out that, in a meeting with the area residents, they felt this setback was adequate buffering, especially since that area of the wetlands does have landscaping. He said he was willing topY Yaone-accept ear conditional use permit on the outside parking if it could not be adequately screened and p oliced. According to Mr. Gottlieb, Nationwide Group has outside parking at two other facilities the have owned and operated for twelve years under a conditional use permit in other communities. There has been no problem. He said they have used special high - pressure sodium lights with shields in other facilities that abut residential property and no light spills out within 50 feet of those fixtures. At the nearest point, this storage will be 220 feet from the residential area. Mr. Gottlieb has offered the area residents the authority to select and approve all lighting fixtures. He estimated that the closest light fixture will probably be 300 feet from thegg west property line. Mr Gottlieb said if there was a need for surplus parking it would be at Building D but he did not anticipatee this need. Commissioner Rossbach wondered if there were any corners within the site enoughlarge for a moving van or large truck to go around. Mr. Gottlieb assured him that theg9 buildin g was designed to accommodate fire trucks and the largest of moving vans. They9 anticipateate that it would be used by two to three vans per month. Mr. Rossbach doubted that it was possible for trucks to maneuver through parts of the site. Commissionerisioner Rossbach expressed a concern about the lighting on the north and south side ofp the building. He said the plan "does show lights spilling out beyond the property line." This would affect a residence and a motel, both zoned M -1. He suggested putting the light on the property line and aiming it back toward the proposed building. Mr. Gottlieb thought that couldpYg easily be done. Planning Commission 4- Miniutes of 01 -04 -99 Commissioner Rossbach felt a couple of the staff recommendations should be Looked at. He thought the site plan to be approved should have the date mentioned, additional parking should not be located west of the existing development line as delineated on the approved plan, and it should not be recommended that the fence be a wood fence which are frequently poorly constructed and "look terrible" within a few years. He said more should be required of a fence in a commercial area. Mr. Roberts did not see how it would be possible to go west of the west building without cutting part of the building off. He said the building goes from almost up to the property line to the wetland easement edge. Commissioner Trippler questioned whether the residents or the applicant favored a decorative wood fence. Mr. Gottlieb said the neighbors requested this. He said security was very important to the owners. He was receptive to the possibility of a chain -Link fence with vinyl- coating and slats. Commissioner Rossbach suggested that some vinyl fences were very nice and looked just like wood. Mr. Gottlieb agreed and was willing to use this type of fence. Mr. Gottlieb clarified that there would be only one fence around the perimeter of the property. Commissioner Seeber asked how the pretreatment pond would function. Mr. Gottlieb said this pond was added at the recommendation of the Ramsey Washington Watershed District. Commissioner Ledvina asked if it would be appropriate to limit the term of the conditional use permit on the outdoor storage portion that is within 350 feet of the property line to the east of Building E specifically for one year. Mr. Roberts thought he may have said something about Building B in regard to outdoor storage and he should have said the area of Building C. That lessened Mr. Ledvina's concern as it related to that setback. Commissioner Rossbach pointed out that the whole CUP would be reviewed in one year. The commission discussed changes /additions to the staff recommendations. Consideration was given to requiring a specific fence material. Mr. Roberts suggested that a condition could be added in the recommendations to be reviewed by the community design review board. He also thought it could be left to Commissioner Ledvina, who is also a CDRB member, to bring this up at their meeting. Commissioner Rossbach said this issue frequently comes up and his opinion was that the city should look at fencing and select a certain criteria that would be required. Commissioner Thompson felt it could be the maintenance of the wood fence and not the construction that was the problem. Mr. Rossbach refuted this. Commissioner Ledvina moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a mini - storage facility on the west side of Highway 61 on the old MapleLeaf Drive -In Theater site. This permit is needed because one of the buildings would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district. The city bases the approval on the findings required by code and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans date - stamped November 25, 1998, building elevations date - stamped December 2, 1998, and the site lighting and civil drawings date - stamped December 2, 1998, approved by the city. Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 01 -04 -99 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The city council may require additional parking in the future if the council determines that there is a need for additional parking on the site. 5. Outdoor storage is permitted on the site for Building C provided it is screened from the west and north by a six -to- eight- foot -tall decorative screening fence designed subject to staff review. The outdoor storage in this area shall be reevaluated when Building C is proposed for construction. 6. The applicant shall dedicate a drainage easement over all wetland areas and the proposed pretreatment pond. The city engineer shall approve final design of the pond prior to construction. 7. The hours of operation shall be as proposed by the applicant. Gate hours are to be Monday- Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday - Sunday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. The office hours are Monday- Friday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturday, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. and closed on Sunday. 8. Lighting on the north and south property shall be modified to provide the fixtures at the property boundary shining unto the buildings. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Commissioner Rossbach asked for a friendly amendment to add the hours of operation in A. 7. and add A. 8. to modify the lighting. Commissioner Ledvina seconded the friendly amendment. Ayes —all Ayes —all The motion passed. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JANUARY 12, 1999 VI. DESIGN REVIEW B. Acorn Mini - Storage Facility Highway 61 on the old MapleLeaf Drive -in Theater Site. Ellis Gottlieb, of the Nationwide Group, presented this proposal. The review board discussed the following issues with Mr. Gottlieb: building colors, the screening fence for the outdoor storage area, the location of outdoor storage area, landscaping and site lighting. Boardmember Ledvina, who is also a Maplewood planning commissioner, spoke about the planning commission's concerns in regard to the need for a durable fence around the outdoor storage area and the possible need for further study into the current rules and regulations for site lighting. Staff was directed to study the lighting ordinance. Boardmember Robinson moved the Community Design Review Board: B. Approve the site plan date - stamped November 25, 1998, the landscape plan date - stamped January 12, 1999, the building elevations date - stamped December 2, 1998 and the site lighting and civil drawings date - stamped December 2, 1998 for the Acorn Mini - Storage Facility on the west side of Highway 61 on the old MapleLeaf Drive -in Theater site, based on the findings required by the code. The property owner shall: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Provide the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit: a. A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval. The erosion control plan shall comply with ordinance requirements. The existing cast -iron sanitary sewer pipe, which served the old house on the property, shall be severed and terminated at the street right -of -way. b. A tree survey identifying quality trees on the site that are eight inches or more in caliper. Staff may require additional trees for code compliance. c. A building -color scheme consisting of neutral colors. d. A fence design plan for the screening fence around the outdoor storage area. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction. b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. Restore and seed or sod any and all disturbed ground such as the areas of blacktop removal and the future building pads for Buildings C and D. Remove all old driveway entrances and restore with sod. Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes of 01 -12 -99 c. Install a handicap - parking sign for the handicap - parking space. d. Screen all roof - mounted equipment visible from adjacent residential properties. Such equipment visible on non- residential sides must be painted to match the building. e. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure if there will be any outdoor storage of refuse. The enclosures must match the building in color and materials. There must be a closeable gate that is 100% opaque. f. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all lawn areas on the front and sides of Building A. g. Provide site - security lighting that is directed or shielded so not to cause any lighting nuisance for adjacent property owners or drivers. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives cash escrow .for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5. Comply with any requirements of MnDot for access to the frontage road. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 7. There shall not be any outdoor storage permitted in the area designated for Building D. Boardmember Ledvina seconded. Ayes all The motion passed. Agenda item H.3 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Design Review In & Out Market/Maplewood Auto Service LOCATION: 743 North Century Avenue DATE: January 13, 1999 INTRODUCTION Project Description Aotion by Cotlnoil. Endoarsec . Modifi e Rej Date Ray Muckala, owner of the In & Out Market and Maplewood Auto Service, is proposing to build two second -story additions on his building. The larger one (on the south side of the building) would measure 46- by 39 -feet (1,794 square feet) and would be used for offices and storage. The smaller one (on the northwest corner of the car wash) would measure 27- by 33 -feet (891 square feet) and would be for storage only. Refer to the maps on pages 6-8 and Mr. Muckala's letter on page 9. The proposed additions would not affect the site or the footprint of the building. The smaller addition would have a board and batten exterior to match the back of the building. The larger addition in front would have a metal -panel exterior and would also match the building color. Requests The applicant is requesting: 1. A conditional use permit (CUP) to change a nonconforming use. This repair garage and fuel station is a nonconforming use because it is closer than 350 feet to residentially -zoned property. The city code prohibits "major" motor fuel stations ( "major" fuel stations are those having more than two fuel dispensers) within 350 feet of a residential zoning district. 2. Approval of the architectural plans. BACKGROUND September 28, 1992: The city council granted a CUP for Mr. Muckala to remodel the building, enlarge the fuel island canopy and add a fuel -pump island when he began selling Holiday fuel. DISCUSSION Conditional Use Permit The city council should approve the CUP revision for these additions. The purpose of the 350 -foot setback in the code is to provide a buffer between major motor fuel stations and residential neighborhoods. The proposed construction, however, would not intensify the applicant's business, but would only help the applicant's operation within the building by providing more office and storage space. Staff would have difficulty recommending approval of a building expansion proposal if it involved enlarging the footprint of the building. The two proposed additions would be visible to the neighbors, but staff does not feel they would be obtrusive. Design Considerations This. request by the applicant gives the city the opportunity to improve the appearance of the building. Specifically, the color scheme should be updated to a uniform appearance. In the 1980s, Mr. Muckala made building renovations and developed the red and yellow color scheme shown on the south side of the building. In the early 1990s, he added the red, white and blue Holiday. Station colors to the red and yellow. The community design review board has. mentioned on occasion a desire for a more unified color scheme for this building. Now is an appropriate time since two new elements are proposed to be added to the structure. The applicant should propose a color scheme for the review board's approval for the total building before obtaining a building permit for either addition. Parking Lot/Site Considerations The applicant is not proposing any parking lot changes at this time. The parking stripes shown on the site plan were not intended to indicate a proposed restriping plan, but instead, to indicate proof -of- parking. Presently, there are enough parking spaces on site to meet the code. Since the number of parking spaces is not an issue with this request, staff is not proposing any changes. Any site work or on -grade building enlargement the applicant may propose in the future, however, would require the submittal of a fully - developed grading, drainage and paving plan for the westerly parking lot. Outside Storage One of Mr. Muckala's neighbors wrote a letter (see pages 10 -11) complaining about "junk" kept in the fenced -in westerly parking lot. while inspecting for this proposal, I found that the northeast corner of this area has a storage pile of old tires and miscellaneous materials. This neighbor wished the city to deny the construction request. Staff feels the city should take this opportunity to require the cleanup of any discarded materials. Any useable materials should be kept inside the building or in a proper screening enclosure - ---not stored outside. COMMITTEE ACTIONS January 4, 1999: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP. January 13, 1999: The community design review board recommended approval of the building - design plans. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on pages 12 -13 approving a conditional use permit to add two second -story additions on the repair garage and fuel station at 743 N. Century Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions: 0 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. Before getting a building permit, the property owner shall submit a uniform building -color scheme for approval by the community design review board. 5. The property owner shall not pave the graveled westerly parking lot unless first submitting a fully - developed grading, drainage, paving and striping plan for the city's approval. 6. Before getting a building permit, the property owner shall remove all debris, parts and old tires from the site. B. Approve the plans and building elevations date - stamped November 23, 1998 for two second - story additions on the Maplewood Auto Service building at 743 N. Century Avenue. The property owner shall comply with the following conditions: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, the property owner shall submit a uniform building -color scheme for approval by the community design review board. 3. The property owner shall not pave the graveled westerly parking lot unless first submitting a fully - developed grading, drainage, paving and striping plan for the city's approval. 4. Before getting a building permit, the property owner shall remove all debris, parts and old tires from the site. 5. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200% of the cost of the unfinished work. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 7. Any new roof -top mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from the adjacent residential properties and/or painted to match the building color if it can be seen from any other direction. 3 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.27 acres Existing land use: Maplewood Auto Service and the In & Out Market SURROUNDING LAND USES North: A &W Restaurant and single dwellings South: Minnehaha Avenue and McDonald's Restaurant West: One Single dwelling East: Century Avenue and Freedom Station PAST ACTIONS (Other Stations) The city council has approved CUPs to expand these motor fuel stations which are closer than 350 feet to residential property: April 11, 1988: The HCO Fuel Station at 2228 Maplewood Drive added a fuel - island canopy. July 22, 1991: Joe Fleming, at 2271 White Bear Avenue, removed his old building, fuel- island canopy and pump islands and built a new facility with a convenience store and service garages. September 28, 1992: Ray Muckala, of the Holiday Express Station at 743 N. Century Avenue, added a pump island, enlarged his fuel - island canopy and remodeled his building. February 14, 1994: John Fleming, at 9 N. Century Avenue south of the proposed SA station, added a new fuel- island canopy and pump islands. Mr. Fleming also received a variance to place his new canopy closer than 15 feet to Century Avenue. March 24, 1997: The Super America station at 11 South Century Avenue removed their old building and fuel island and canopy and built a new facility. PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: BC (business commercial) Zoning: BC Code Requirements Section 36- 151(b)(9)(c) prohibits major motor fuel stations within 350 feet of a residential lot line. Section 36 -17(e) allows the enlargement of a nonconforming use by CUP. Criteria for CUP Approval Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may grant a CUP, subject to the nine standards for approval. Refer to the resolution on pages 12 -13. N p:sec251in &out.cup Attachments: 1 Location Map 2. Properly Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Applicant's letter of CUP request dated November 23, 1998 5. Letter from Shanyn M. Charles dated December 12, 1998 6. CUP Resolution 7. Plans date- stamped November 23, 1998 (separate attachments) 5 Attachment 1 A t z t+ _ LARPE NTEUR AV W 1680 N . o Q T29N R22W. c IDAHO AV 14113 °Q S 24`49 it s t (1) CURR IE ST LN / Xic " 87AELSICSR4SKAAVtjMYR7LE ,55' t CCA ORwriel RT (2) ',; i I ' 3 PI TREE DR t 3 4 — . G OIRCNVIEW DR 14 4 0 R14409 QEIKLANA Cr N REEDRd MOW DAKNILL IC1' 6 SIRCN TREE OR17ROLL /N6 hpL1.S ORGANGELA ANTELOPE Mal' t A MBERJACK • LA t MICKEY / 3 BEAVEROALE RD o IVY 8 I e08CAT LA ELKNEART LA D GOUGER LA 50L6N/N C FQrp E ' Z68 o.. l Z nY 31 _ —1 • rip NAWTMORNE AV A Ay AV 1200 N.1200 N. E ROSE t N ST 3 68 JAW GER G RA Ah :r 0 eover MAGNOL AV 4v a . 9 , ww wke Of CASE AV H ° AR ESTER Z A` 960960NO . ¢ CTI L W BRAND AV 32 32 o R• SEVENTW ST E Crnlr E • - - 1010 P h BUSH AV Q t MINNEMAF4A m AV 34720NO 720 N. H MARGARET 68 L ; 265 .z I err • 00'* l .. l ° Z cR M • J 7nR zo w 4 ' k. - -f - - - 2 Q 1 ti Y 1 av SEP"CE oQ 4 480NO 8 0 N.r 23f 1 LOCATION MAP .Q N 0 Attachment 2 e a o -- — -- -- — — — s`• 24d Lo --si — — — Ocn l MEOW Lit ow) 2 .• leiZol w , _ ) 750 749 ' •; N , >"" --- - 400WOONOWN, ---w MOM . ( 44) _ Q a &w744 ,2074 743 , 9. gel• s .. UNION CEM 7UN 43 j.... . OF 04 INWOU01' 30 o ? MINNEHAHA AVENUE 13t @12'x R s X9.0. ' ' 4tq.o '9.s3 ',IN s . • ,• , ` WN t . •• e;• a W . a 1 ACDONALD'S z elf 1 . osl 5st io+ - W o ao'2730 > 2696 0 w: 1 4 5+ 3 L i • o L t i 5 2698 j t O 1T .2700 705 z I 12702 V 1 u r r K a 991 ONO Nab > ;, i I I • a 1 t •+ p , ZLl M , M .o : • 119. •. sj '-' : 1 ilk119 ! 9 s MARGAR AV E. - a 20,Ot t90• CS7) ONO psi O 411,000 4- t9•fo• rk S C i&*o%r su - 0.s ors ' 00wr , s ?”1 i t •' ; tax. Is L4, is :. 7'Yo Q fo.l6w r.R 2 ONO 1"o Vi tlage. a N L P.S • . 14 !V irocL 3 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP SITE 7 4 N Attachment PROPOSED 2ND-STORY ADDITIONS STORAGE-ROOM ADDITION CAM " p AR WASH I I S loW i R l eK la" 'Wo4ovem IN & OUT MARKET , 1 MAPLEWOOD-Al.-T.D. or OFFICE AND b LmeSTORAGE-ROOM ADDITION , , • , `. , . _ 1 Kos - . a MINNEHAHA AVENUE SITE PLAN 8 4 v I Attachment 4 i NOV 2- o: b _ L - o, it k T IL rJr4ar--Q 'i S=i2 if OR 1 Vp e i L g f . ` d , Cj_ y . c ._ A i %o } J/ 1- 4 1 C, f aAC WJ A-IJleAe 9 I I Attachment 51998 I/t OJ 744/ na-00or ob are.- , j V4W., a i - 4 oc C& Ole-, f a,,00r 10 Jon 4COC (a; ry\oe" cioer, of-( COL 0 11 Attachment 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ray Muckala applied for a conditional use permit to add two second -story additions on his repair garage and convenience- store. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 743 North Century Avenue. The legal description is: LOTS 15,16 AND 17, BLOCK 1, CAHANES ADDITION. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On January 4, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on . City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, gG"cral unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for Public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 12 Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. Before getting a building permit, the property owner shall submit a uniform building -color scheme for approval by the community design review board. b. The property owner shall not pave the graveled westerly parking lot unless first submitting a fully- developed grading, drainage, paving and striping plan for the city's approval. S. Before getting a building permit, the property owner shall remove all debris, parts and old tires from the site. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 1999. 13 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JANUARY 12, 1999 VI. DESIGN REVIEW A. Building Additions — Maplewood Auto Service, 743 Century Avenue North Ray Muckala, the owner of the building, had no problem with the staff recommendations. Secretary Tom Ekstrand distributed copies of a letter from Mr. Muckala that addressed one of the items that pertained to clean up in the back fenced area. Mr. Muckala was not aware that some demolition debris from the A & W drive -in next door, that was laying near his dumpster, could be seen from the neighbor behind. He said it was removed as soon as he was notified. Mr. Muckala showed colored photos of the existing building. His intention was to replace the yellow stripe with white tape and to redo the fascia so the reds match. A sign sizing will be used over the vinyl and then this will be painted. The squares on the garage doors will remain red. Mr. Muckala said it would cost thousands of dollars to change the color on these doors. The window frames and trim on the additions will be the same bronze as on the existing building. Boardmember Robinson said their concern was to have the building look uniform in style and color, not like an "obtruse building that is being added and added." Harry Garrish, the architect, said additional HVAC equipment will be added on the existing roof. Mr. Muckala said the south side of the building is a totally separate corporation and the colors would not necessarily be tied in with a future change in oil company ownership. Mr. Garrish said that 95 percent of the retail fuel outlets are red, white, and blue. He felt it was incumbent on the owner of a facility, from a marketing standpoint, to create a harmonious exterior. Chairperson Erickson asked of there was anyone who had questions or comments. No one in the audience responded. He closed the item for comment from the public. Boardmember Ledvina moved the Community Design Review Board: B. Approve the plans and building elevations date - stamped November 23, 1998 for two second -story additions on the Maplewood Auto Service building at 743 N. Century Avenue. The property owner shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, the property owner shall submit a uniform building - color scheme for approval by the community design review board. 3. The property owner shall not pave the graveled westerly parking lot unless first submitting a fully - developed grading, drainage, paving and striping plan for the city's approval. 4. Before getting a building permit, the property owner shall remove all debris, parts and old tires from the site. Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes of 01 -12 -99 5. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200% of the cost of the unfinished work. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 7. Screen any new roof -top mechanical equipment that may be added from view of any adjacent residential properties. Any new roof -top equipment that could be seen from nonresidential areas shall be painted to match the building fascia color. Staff shall review any screening proposal. Boardmember Robinson seconded. Ayes all The motion passed. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JANUARY 4, 1999 B. Maplewood Auto Service Conditional Use Permit Revision (743 Century Avenue) Ken Roberts, associate planner, summarized the staff report. He referred to a letter from Mr. Muckala that was distributed earlier in the evening. This letter was written in response to a few concerns that neighbors had expressed about some outside storage and the colors of the building. Commissioner Rossbach mentioned the campers that are stored on the property and asked what the CUP allows on this site. Mr. Roberts said the CUP approved in 1992 by the city council did not have any specific conditions other than approving the site plan. He said this storage has been viewed as an accessory use to the existing auto service and fuel station. Ray Muckala, the applicant, said he has been attempting to phase out the recreational vehicle rental business over the last three years. He operated this RV rental for 15 of his 25 years in business at this site and has had up to 12 units. Mr. Muckala parks these vehicles along a ten - foot -fence on the north lot line and said they hardly visible from the road. He claims he has a plan for changing the storage of tires which are now piled by the RVS. He plans to construct a fence on the inside of the existing fence that will screen the dumpster area from the west. Mr. Muckala said that, as soon as he was advised that there was a problem with this debris, he began to clean it up. Commissioner Rossbach commented that the plans submitted were not complete. Mr. Muckala said the other addition was simply four open walls. Commissioner Thompson noted that the existing ten - year -old wood fence on this site is one of the "better maintained fences that we have seen in quite awhile." Commissioner Pearson moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution approving a conditional use permit to add two second -story additions on the repair garage and fuel station at 743 Century Avenue North. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. Before getting a building permit, the property owner shall submit a uniform building color scheme for approval by the community design review board. 5. The property owner shall not pave the graveled westerly parking lot unless first submitting a fully - developed grading, drainage, paving and striping plan for the city's approval. 6. Before getting a building permit, the property owner shall remove all debris, parts and old tires from the site. Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Bituminous Curb Variance — Just for Feet LOCATION: 3090 Southlawn Drive DATE: January 13, 1999 INTRODUCTION Agenda Item R`4 Action by Council Endorse ...._.o..- ....,,. Modifi Rej eoted.._ _ Date John Johannson, of Welsh Companies, is requesting a variance from the concrete- curbing requirement for a portion of his Just- far -Feet site. Refer to the snaps on pages 4-6. Mr."Johannson edged the future - development site north of Just- for -Feet with bituminous curbing to serve as a temporary curb. Refer to his variance justification on page 7. The city code does not allow bituminous curbing —not even temporarily. BACKGROUND Just- for -Feet October 14,1997: The community design review board (CDRB) approved the building design, site and landscape plans. November 12, 1997: The staff approved a lot split to create the future building site north of Just - for - Feet. July 28, 1998: The CDRB approved a comprehensive sign plan for Just- far -Feet and the future - development site to the north. First Evangelical Free Church Curbing First Evangelical Free Church, at 2696 Hazelwood Street, installed bituminous curbing along the edge of their parking lot where they anticipated a future expansion. On July 24, 1995, the city council amended the church's conditional use permit to give them three years to expand their parking lot and remove this curbing. The church complete this work by last summer as required. DISCUSSION Concrete vs. Bituminous Curbing The code requires concrete curbs for esthetics, durability and function (drainage control, traffic control and as a landscape edge). Bituminous curbs do not hold up as long and deteriorate quicker in appearance and usefulness. The applicant's temporary asphalt curb is already damaged with a missing portion along its southerly edge and there are several marred areas. In spite of the easily- damaged nature of bituminous curbing, staff does not feel that it is reasonable to require Mr. Johannson to remove it at this time. The city council should amortize this curb for three years as they did for First Evangelical Free Church in 1995. This deadline for replacement would give Mr. Johannson time to develop the future - development site north of Just - for -Feet. Variance vs. Code Amendment There is no basis to approve this request since the need for the variance is not caused by a characteristic of the property. The need for the variance - was created by the applicant which does not justify approval based on state statute. Staff suggests, instead, that the council amend the code to permit bituminous curbs on a temporary basis. The code already. allows waiving certain requirements, subject to the discretion of the CDRB or city council. For instance, the CDRB may waive the trash enclosure requirement if trash dumpsters would not be seen. The council may also waive the lawn- irrigation requirement if there are other acceptable methods for watering. Staff recommends that bituminous curbs be allowed temporarily and on a case -by -case basis where, as in this case, a future adjacent development would occur. Three years is an adequate amount of time for any future development to occur, or if not, for a developer to replace the bituminous curbing with concrete curbing. In the meantime, Mr. Johannson should repair any damage of his bituminous curbing. COMMITTEE ACTIONS January 12,1999: The community design review board recommended denial of the variance and approval of the code change. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Deny the proposed variance to allow the use of bituminous curbing adjacent to 3090 Southlawn Drive. The need for the variance was not due to circumstances unique to the property, but was created by the applicant. This is contrary to the findings for variance approval as stipulated by state statute. B. Approve the code change on page 8 allowing the temporary use of bituminous curbing. 2 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 5.42 acres (includes both Just- for -Feet and the abutting vacant site) Existing land use: Just- for -Feet SURROUNDING LAND USES North: County Road D and Maplewood Town Center Shopping Center South: Maplewood Best Western Motel West: Southlawn Drive and undeveloped property planned BC East: Toys -R -Us PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: BC (business commercial) Zoning: BC Ordinance Requirement Section 36 -22© states that all parking lots shall have continuous concrete curbing surrounding the exterior perimeter of the lot and drives. Park parking lots, that are not used in the winter, and parking lots having twelve (12) spaces or less are exempt from this requirement, unless required by the city engineer for drainage control. Variance Findings for Approval State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Undue hardship ", as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. p:sec2n\justfeet.var Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Variance Justification from John Johannson dated- stamped December 30, 1998 5. Code Amendment 3 Attachment 1 HEIGHTS VVH1 COUNTY ROAD D o WOODLYNN AV lz LYDIA o r 2 1. SUMMIT CT. z2COUNTRYVIEWCIR. S`T 2 3. DULUTH CT. 6 Oy p w 4. IYDUI ST. n S o ® AVE. BEAM N.gn AVE. BEAM t; ILI MAPLE VIEW o RADATZ 0 go W 3 o AV QI i Markham RAMSEY W W P I // COUNTY v COURT co KOHLMAN AVE. v W KOHLMIAN Casey Lake vNorm o AVE. _ ROAD C m 0 g > kl Tp N El v Cl, D z W Z < i W Z o: CT EDGEHILL RD.oc cc NOR S AVE, DEMO AVE. Q o • Q. 0 BROOKS AVE. BROOKS AVE. TH I-- SEX TANT z y A. ZaAVE. W cnGERVArS , . GERVAIS GERV CToivGRANDVIEWAVE. W Y w VIKING DR. SHERREN AVE. AVE, O Knucc0 ead Lake . • Z COP COPE AVE. COPE AVE. r , z _1ARKgCT. W v AVE. LARK AVE. 0. LAUR R0. CO. < RD. LAURIE RD. o LAURIE ° RD W fn u z porf 1a3 _ ND RD. a o SAN URST AVE. S o v c JUNCTION AVE. W Z g N Y CO. RD. B in obw _j 2 UeVCEAVE. BURKE AVE. o ® BURKE AVE. c.tK ST o ( vE. $ P MO ` ELDR IDGE AVE. 304, Mp LN. v' J Sri .VE. BELMONT AVE. LOCATION MAP 4 N EMMWNI Attachment 2 s N VACANT BUILDING 11 FI A 6YV I TRANSMISSION a emM 1 SHMAPLEWOODTOWNCENTERMERCIAL . .. K i A M ry t t t 0 Tc C7 2f1 MD SHOPPING CENTER I.•a,. boo tot COUNTY ROAD D - - X89 sS/K 3 • M 79W zol 1 N NE r ' . 1t; t tD FUTURE BUILDING SITE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY 1 MAPLEWOOD PLAZA O 1 2.82 ac. ss.7 ;... .fir: -• - -- --- '..ti:.. r ....r { ::_ — .• 4.0 S anais 0i•1 Co. E t. BK. 123.3 P. 27 oe $k. 1714 p. 61 I New S 111 .P. Train mi ss*on E5 t. ell r 1n iD BEST WESTERN p *pZoetBG •21•,8co 0 Z • 1 ' A6 % - - - - - - -- - - - -J6 dFIMMI 41 o 10.6 6 ear, MAPLEWOOD 4 MALL PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 5 4 N r. r.; .::..: ::::......,. -r • .:•rr..r :ti !: :':. ?: 3:: ty'{rpj r. v: i• };. rrl..•..,_ . . •.' : X., ?f` ?YJQ\I•!1>"•'• .. r :•. {..y.4 •. } : {• }:!v' %::•i: r•i' .9 TTOYS-RmUS Y r {r Y - jJ %•{f ': Y•y{.•Jt }'Y. :J }:':{ SIS Y. yyyN „ e : Jh. ZI we i: t::: v::::.:•.:vrrr:: r, Y.': r.'. (:. -'j ::. }. ;: is {S rrr Y }. }•J.rr}}¢¢,, . . . rff .. ".t :•• ' f r BEST WESTERN p *pZoetBG •21•,8co 0 Z • 1 ' A6 % - - - - - - -- - - - -J6 dFIMMI 41 o 10.6 6 ear, MAPLEWOOD 4 MALL PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 5 4 N Attachment 3 llu COUNTY ROAD D AO' SW ROWOW a COMCKX Gurmt 7- s ate •i riftr_ /' ,.1 r C2Z 3" au G13f71O r !u I I ( s ( f I i t1! I I I ! ( 0 "° 3" it I(I(111 III W I I I W as r tse' Z I 1! ilk w I II FUTURE BLDG. "" I F.F.E.= 927.0 nti , •I I ' +{ I I 1 1 i 1 I " a ; I 4 n, lgl X z ( MAP a• MA IL I ( 3u , I ' EX.. BLDG. I F.FiE. =931.62 y 0 w :. ; , .: s •. co a j10.sT 3 I9Ao :sue s' 21A = ss s s° ' O snow sss >v For i I - 1 JUST FOR FEET o z 3"su ( I i I i NO PAMMG I F.F.E.= 927.0 ( I I I M ARC14MCWPAL PLO4 U Ti I l t s ss, jai us Los xa —' Q — -dos _ no I I , 1 ,00, I` _.._.._ _.._.. .._.. _.. _.._....._ , 1 6 'x6' sntlKSr M» C I I ,t SEMA tools i r%V%AND SOLM"If TO WETLAND OVA&MG wLl. i f e I awl Air - i a w WSW • SITE PLAN LNk 4 N Attachment 4 Variance Request City of Maplewood Just For Feet Project q[ r. r i DEC 3 0 1998 . r • - .. ..rte... r .. .. ..-. . This correspondence serves as the written request regarding the variance for the Just For Feet project in Maplewood, Minnesota. The variance request relates to the temporary condition of the bituminous paving curbs that have been installed around the future development lot adjacent to the Just For Feet building. The site totals approximately 5.85 acres. Approximately 2.4 acres have been developed in their entirety with the Just For Feet building and site improvements. The remaining 3.4 acres is being marketed for build -to -suit opportunities for additional retail users. While we are negotiating with a couple of users, we do not yet have a pending or imminent transaction. The parcel is currently platted as one single parcel, though we have an intention to submit a request for a lot split shortly which would separate the Just For Feet project from the future development parcel. As developer, we made a decision to complete all of the sitework for the entire 5.85 acre site, even though we were only utilizing the 2.4 acres for Just For Feet. This includes all the utilities, parking areas, curb and gutter, parking lot lighting, landscaping, etc., around the entire property. The only portion that is not improved is the future building pad and the sidewalks and curbs directly adjacent to the future building pad. To provide some form and outline for the future building pad, as well as to avoid soil erosion, we installed the bituminous paving curb around the future building area as shown on the attached plans. The city has requested that the bituminous paving curbs be removed and replaced with a poured in place concrete curb. We believe this creates an undue hardship, is not a good use of materials, and should prove the basis for a variance for the following reasons: 1. The future building area will be constructed on a build -to -suit basis to accommodate future, unidentified tenants. As such, the site plan cannot yet be determined — thus the exact placement of the future building, curbs, sidewalks, etc., cannot be determined. Therefore, it is most probable that if we were required to install concrete curbs at this time, that they would have to be removed at a later date and then replaced again with more concrete curbs. This is certainly not a good use of time, money, or natural resources. 2. The site drainage systems and access roads function as designed with the existing bituminous paving curbs. There are no wash out or drainage problems. The developer installed all sitework improvements including the main parking area for the future building area that allows for controlled storm drainage. 3. The estimated cost of removing the bituminous paving curb, patching the blacktop, and replacing it with a concrete curb is $10,500.00 ($21.50 per lineal foot). Upon leasing the future building area to a future tenant, this concrete curb would need to be removed and replaced again. We appreciate your consideration of this request. Companies 7 Attachment 5 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CURBING REQUIREMENTS The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: Section 1. This section changes Sections 36 -220 as follows (additions are underlined): All parking lots shall have continuous concrete Garbing surrounding the exterior perimeter of the lot and drives. Park parking lots, that are not used in the winter, and parking lots .having twelve 12) spaces or less are exempt from this requirement, unless required by the city engineer for drainage control. The community design review board may allow continuous bituminous curbing temporarily on a case- by-case basis, subject to the following conditions: W Bituminous curbing may be permitted for phased or staged developments where an adjace curb Bituminous curbing shall not be allowed for more than three years from the time of installation, at which time it must be removed due to the construction of a future phase of development or simply replaced with permanent continuous concrete curbing. Q Bituminous curbing shall not be permitted if the city engineer requires concrete curbing for drainage control W Bituminous curbing that becomes damaged shall be repaired immediately or as soon as the weather permits. 51 The city may require that the developer provide escrow to cover the replacement of the bituminous curbing. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 1999. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes — Nays — MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD BEAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JANUARY 12, 1999 VI. DESIGN REVIEW C. Bituminous Curbing Variance —Just for Feet, 3090 Southlawn Drive John Johannson, of Welsh Companies, discussed his request with the review board for a variance to be allowed to continue using bituminous curbing in two areas north of the Just for Feet store. Staff discussed the recommendation to deny the variance, but instead recommended amending the curbing ordinance to.. permit bituminous curbing temporarily under certain circumstances. Staff explained that there is no basis for approving a variance under the requirements of the state statute. The proposed ordinance would allow the use of bituminous curbing for three years when there would be a future construction phase that would occur. The bituminous curbing could be used for up to three years to allow for the next phase of construction, or, if not, it would have to be replaced with concrete curbing. Mr. Johannson agreed with staff's recommendation and felt that he would be beginning his last phase of development within the three -year deadline. The board discussed whether it would be advisable to require a developer to provide escrow to guarantee the replacement of bituminous curbing after three years. Staff said this is a good idea. Mr. Johannson concurred and stated that the city is holding escrow from him for this purpose. Boardmember Ledvina moved the Community Design Review Board recommend denial of the variance based on the reasons stated in the staff report and also recommended approval of the code amendment with the additional requirement that a developer submit escrow if they are to use bituminous curbing on a temporary basis. Boardmember Johnson seconded. Ayes all The motion passed. MEMORANDUM TO: Michael McGuire, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: February 1, 1999 RE: On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License AGENDA KI lotion by Council::. 19ndo a ... .. M o d i f i e d ..,... ... 1. Rejeote .. .. Date Scott M. Formaro has applied for an intoxicating liquor license for a new business. This is the city's last available license. Our office received an application from Mr. Formaro for an intoxicating liquor license that will be used at 1700 -K Rice Street (Crown Plaza). The establishment, Stargate Bar & Dance Club, is a new business. As required by City ordinances, aside from the necessary background investigation on the applicant, the building was inspected by the City Health Inspector, Building Inspector, and the Fire Marshall. The establishment received approval from all. Mr. Formaro has met with Chief Winger and the City Clerk and has been given a copy of the City Code of Ordinances that apply to being an intoxicating liquor license holder. There has been nothing found that would prevent Mr. Formaro, or the establishment at 1700 -K Rice Street, in being a license holder. It is recommended that Council approve the application. TO: FROM: C i Agenda Item I2. MEMORANDUM ---- fiction by Council.:Michael A. McGuire, City and Bruce K. Anderson, Directo reation Endorsed__s Re codified_______ Red acted________1 99 ity Council Meeting DateDATE: January 28, 1999 for the Feb SUBJECT: Four Seasons Park Tot Lot Location INTRODUCTION The Maplewood City Council allocated $60,000 for construction of a children's play area at Four Seasons Park in the 1998 Capital Improvement Plan. Staff forwarded requests for proposals to six playground manufacturers. The bids were predicated on relocating the tot lot in the north end of the park parallel to Demont Avenue which was the recommendation by both the park planning consultant, Brauer & Associates, and city staff. A series of meetings has been held with the neighborhood to review the playground location and equipment proposal. BACKGROUND The 1998 C.I.P. proposes three new playgrounds for Robinhood, Four Seasons and Afton Heights Parks. Requests for proposals were forwarded to playground manufacturers in mid - August. I held an informal neighborhood meeting to review the playground proposals at Four Seasons Park on Thursday, September 17. Approximately 30 neighbors attended. Those attending were split down the middle regarding stafFs proposed park location as contrasted with leaving it in the existing location. Following the neighborhood meeting at Four Seasons Park, I forwarded a survey to all single family residences between Hazelwood, County Road C, White Bear Avenue and Gervais Avenue. The survey response was again split down the middle with those preferring the existing location by a small margin. The actual survey breakdown was 46% existing location, 43% for new site and 11% for the alternate site. A second neighborhood meeting was held at Maplewood City Hall Council Chambers on October 8. Staff reviewed the survey results and it became apparent that again the neighborhood was split regarding the proposed location, but there appeared to be a general support for leaving the equipment at the existing site. Staff indicated at that time that a third alternative would be considered. The third alternative was to locate the preschool equipment where the existing backstop was located and put the 9- to 12- year -olds' equipment in the existing location. Staff received a second proposal from a playground equipment manufacturer which showed this was feasible. A third meeting was held with the neighborhood residents on Thursday, December 10. The third proposal was reviewed and testimony was once again taken by the neighborhood. The majority of neighbors at this meeting were supportive of the Demont site. L < M• Four Seasons Park Tot Lot Location Page 2 January 28, 1999 The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission held a fourth meeting on Tuesday, January 19, at the Maplewood Community Center. This meeting was attended by 34 residents and the majority supported staffs proposed location, but there remains a very strong group of residents adamantly opposed to the proposed site. The Parks and Recreation Commission voted (6 ayes, 0 nays) to relocate the playground equipment to the north end of the park. It should be noted that a resident proposed a fourth concept which was reviewed by the Commission which would have addressed the handicapped accessibility concerns raised by staff. Staff has held four neighborhood meetings to resolve the location of the tot lot at Four Seasons Park. The neighborhood is extremely derisive and no consensus has been reached. Staff supports the Demont Avenue playground relocation for the following rationale: 1. The site provides closer proximity to the majority of residential property owners. 2. The site is handicapped accessible. 3. The site will provide a safer environment as it is more open and visually accessible for more residents and parents from Demont Avenue. 4. The third alternative was not agreed upon by the neighborhood because it would separate two age groups of children and we would need to relocate the backstop. 5. The Demont site has good shade coverage and no trees would be removed. 6. Four Seasons Park is a neighborhood park and no off - street parking is proposed as the site is designed as a walk -to, bike -to, stroll -to facility. 7. The site has good access off of Demont and is in close proximity to the tennis court which could be beneficial for parents or guardians playing tennis at the same time. I cannot stress the contentiousness of this issue. Although it appeared at the last two meetings that the majority of residents preferred the Demont site, there certainly is a strong faction of residents who would prefer to have the site at the existing location. I have included an original memo which outlines the pros and cons of the other three sites. RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation that GameTime playground equipment be purchased and installed at Four Seasons Park as proposed in the northern section (Demont Avenue) of Four Seasons Park. kdVourseas.mem FOUR SEASONS PLAYGROUND IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY The Maplewood City Council has approved a $60,000 line item budget for improvements to Four Seasons Park. Four Seasons Park is a 10 -acre site acquired in May 1971 for $25,200. The park was developed in 1975 and minimal improvements have occurred over the years with the exception of the new tennis courts on Demont Avenue. The proposed improvements for Four Seasons Park will be completed in the spring of 1999. The improvements include new playground equipment, concrete perimeter, landscaping, sidewalk, and site amenities including benches and possibly a drinking fountain, budget permitting. Staff held a meeting on Thursday, September 17, with neighborhood residents to discuss the proposed park improvements and review possible playground locations and equipment selection. City staff received a number of positive comments and it became obvious that there was a need to solicit additional opinions from neighborhood residents. prior to making a formal decision as to the location and playground design. Enclosed is a survey to solicit additional opinion. A neighborhood meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, October 8, at 7 p.m. in the Maplewood City Hall Council Chambers, 1830 East County Road B. Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed survey or the proposed park improvements, please contact Parks and Recreation Director Bruce Anderson directly at 770 -4573. The existing tot -lot is located west of the park shelter building and the equipment will be removed in the spring of 1999 as it no longer meets federal safety standards. Existing Tot -Lot Pros: 1 The existing tot -lot location has excellent shade due to the large over -story trees. 2. The site has been there for years and caused minimal issues. 3. The site has already been graded. 4. The site drains relatively well. Existing Tot -Lot Cons: 1. The. existing space is very limited and the proposed playground designs will need to be reduced by 40 -50% 2. It is a difficult site to access due to the steep hill. 3. The site is somewhat isolated from a security standpoint. 4. It is relatively close to one property owner to the west. Proposed Tot -Lot Pros: 1. The proposed site will have excellent shade due to the large over -story trees that will be preserved. 2. The proposed tot -lot is located closer to the majority of home owners and ultimately the playground users. 3. The site would require minimum grading. 4. The site has good access off Demont Avenue and is in close proximity to the tennis courts which would provide dual benefit. Proposed Tot -Lot Cons: 1. The site will be approximately 200 feet from three residential properties, which is considered a reasonable distance, but may cause some additional noise. 2. The tot -lot would be located within an existing "passive grove" of mature trees. 3. The new site would be a greater distance from Gervais Avenue, which could potentially be a detriment to the rand arents from the senior housing complex located to the east.9 P 4. There have been neighborhood residents opposing the proposed location. Alternative Tot -Lot Pros: 1. The site has good access directly off of the paved trail. 2. The location is out in the open and is centrally located within the park. 3. The alternate tot -lot site is close to the P ark shelter building for bathrooms and other purposes. 4. The site is relatively high and should be out of any drainage swale issues. Alternative Tot -Lot Cons: 1. There is no shade to service the tot -lot area. 2. The existing baseball backstop will have to be relocated which will reduce the open field playing space. 3. The site will require some additional grading and possibly minor retaining walls which will increase construction costs. 4. It would be expensive to service the site with a water fountain, as it would be a longer run for a water line to be installed. kdVoursea2.frm 2 y - Mil 940 • _ _ e AVE All-t .4 • D Zit _ t • t .t °' " i „r7 f . _ ° • _.f INC INC vie I r _ .. ., - • { • ' • - r% ... + 944 4 . ' t f> J ; _ _ 9408 - ' ' !-- -• -1-- -• • - _ r ' -940 1 ar 74s f - _• , r '• r r . f .'.' '!`- i'PT }fir 30 Willjc ilk 1 >a/ ,,` - .. p —.. ' . .: _ •: - s+ .•.acs 9432 s - , . ,.. .. /- fir.,. 1 i _ r "o• > - . . '• t - 92 s 1_ i • \ j. 925.0 9/6 / Yj doll- ow Afl vet . * • • T 7 r v 1 • _ 9193 a _ • ; 11• ' l.1 • °• ta a w • aYal `1 a .,•. ` r C ,J _• -! ,, 09393 ` AL Ali / • Al ir tk 919_ _ .' Y • ' `' J ;t . : sue'' . W. N'llilli i 1 ! • a • . S1 a .. • 4 ` , • • o • I .r` = 7pr — +1 IL it s' :. ' - `z ' 9353;,- -•. • y , ; , r. a. , • f • ` •' .7 7. • •ter • • '• Y 9 •i ' _ ' - •• 9 O A _J w - - 17,M 9le9ZIP S189 r _ All jS• ,. ' t -'924gnu r 920. _ 9/6 5 ,.' _ Al iTlipm r Al OR uir Z`'rT • "-3 ' — 4 D ° 935 8 -.• _ _ ?. A , _•, r Qv 943 8 • _; t .a _; . - _, ae ' r 9148 ' • • • - J .: AO n•• • - - - • - ,ter. _ `r ' - r ` i _ ' - v t' •r r !i s - t • E •Mr ' j.. - 1 . /' • I•• • • 9 - AV Ir allb Ji 1 , f• . ....+ w w 2 • > 9223922.7y r •ice .- ° - w , r - _ N ` • rw•... .i1 • -as /'u•r•. .rR r °a •!'"A s OD' Together We Can January 5, 1999 Dear Resident: Enclosed is a copy of the staff report outlining my recommendation regarding the Four Seasons Park tot lot location. 1 would like to take this opportunity to thank each of you for your input and insightful comments and suggestions regarding the Four Seasons Park tot lot location. The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission is a nine- member advisory volunteer board that provides recommendations to the Maplewood City Council on all Parks and Recreation related matters. The Parks and Recreation Commission will be reviewing this issue at a special meeting on Tuesday, January 19. The meeting will be held at the Maplewood Community Center in Room C. The Parks and Recreation Commission will then make a recommendation, along with staffs report, that will be considered by the City Council at their regular scheduled meeting on Monday, February 8. The City Council will make the final recommendation. The City Council meeting will be held at 7 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers at 1830 East County Road B. Should you have any comments regarding the staff report, please contact me directly at 770- 4573. Sincerely, A Bruce K. Anderson Director of Parks and Recreation kd\foursea2.ltr PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 612 -770 -45 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1 830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 Maplewood Parks Commission Recommendation Four Seasons Park On Tuesday, January 19, 1999 the Maplewood Parks Commission reviewed the proposal for moving and purchasing playground equipment at Four Seasons Park. The current location of playground equipment does not meet ADA standards and does not have enough room to hold all of the new playground equipment without having ,a large negative impact on the Park's main sliding hill. The Commission focused on two locations for the playground equipment. One site is off Demont Avenue due east of the tennis courts and recommended by City Staff. The second site is more toward the center of the park and is located where the current ball field backstop is. It is a site recommended by some of the neighbors in the area. The Commission listened to testimony from over 40 neighbors and received several petitions with many signatures. If there was a neighborhood consensus the Commission would have been able to support either site. At this time there seems to be no consensus in the neighborhood and much to our concern there seems to be a split division which has become quite contentious in the neighborhood over this issue. If the current playground equipment wasn't so inadequate, we would have recommended to do nothing at this time. The Commission used five criteria in considering the two sites. The five items are; ease of ADA compliance, convenience to the neighbors, impact on aesthetics and the environment, safety and cost. Ease of ADA compliance - It was felt that both sites would be relative ease to do as long as the alternative site kept all the playground equipment on one level. A slight edge was given to the Demont sight because it was closer to parking, on the street, than the parking lot or street would be for the alternative site. Convenience to the neighbors - The playground equipment would be closer and more convenient at the Demont site since the population center of the area is north of the park. Impact on the aesthetics and environment - The Demont site could possibly impact some trees and some neighbors that feel it would destroy the look of that end of the park. The Commission did not feel that the play ground would have a negative aesthetic impact at either site. Some neighbors expressed concern about minor flooding in the Spring at the Alternative site. According to staff and other neighbors they were not aware of this situation. At the alternative site there are no trees that would be impacted by the playground equipment. This also means that there will be no shade what so ever and would require trees to be planted to provide that shade in the future. The Commission is concerned about the lack of shade at the alternative site. At the Demont site the Commission is concerned about the impact on the trees. The Commission feels that with proper construction the trees would not be impacted and that they would be able to provide needed shade. On this issue the Commission favored the Demont site. Safety - Both sites raised safety concerns. At the Demont site there was concern from the neighbors that a child would run out in the street and be hit by cars or that a car would swerve off the road into the park and hit a child. At the alternative site other neighbors were concerned about people hiding in the woods to kidnap or molest people. They were also concerned that children would be attracted to the fence pond, climb it and fall in and drowned. These are valid concerns that were brought up. When the Commission compared these concerns to other Maplewood neighborhood parks, it was felt that the safety issue is low and equal for the Demont and the alternative site. Cost - The Demont site is cheaper than the alternative site and was favored by the Commission. After weighing all these factors the Maplewood Parks Commission recommends that the playground equipment be installed at the Demont site. TEL x!0.777 -6277 Feb 02 , 99 9:08 P . 01 Tuesday 1`ebrc ary 0*4 1999 T o Mike l ics n 3li, Assist to tfw N111.11agel' Ph 770 -4526 Fax 779 -3570 Pr: Nevin Berglund I'll/ Fax 777-6277 Re: placenlent on the February 08, 1999 council agenda D al• Mr. E j icsoll. 1'111 writing in response to your call of February 01, 1999. Your incssagc wished I ubinit this request in written form by 9a. Feb U2, 1999. The agenda item wou in pall include an explanation from City staff in the form of a special coniprehensive plan o how the health, public safety and welfare of residents and ofthe incoming none- state residents would he protected regarding the propos -ed Ramsey County Intake /Outake Processing Homeless Service Facility for Non- Rcsidents. This wou ld require city staf•to actively 1 in f br theql added role, responsibility, costs and f'orseeable and latent, harm~ such a detrimental goveniment facility will inflict on the City of Ma a the ac:crompanying hanii f' oln tower property values and the compounding effect on children and their schools. Also this agenda. item would require staff to itemize the remuneration niles and regulations Which the just granted conditional use pehnit would impose on County, City and Facility Administrators. Additionally this agend4 item would propose annual budget allocations tar all independent non- prof like entity to Nnction as an evalua and monitor ofthe harm and other costs- the thcility and the influx 'd 1he resulting and accompany' rental housing OUld have on the econoniv and public sifety of individual neighborhoods and oi fmilics in. Maplewood. In addition this non-profit would propose meafiures, work to redecm cost's manage a public safety trust defend indi\ ideals and neighborfloods in Ma f tone the hariYi's ,uust-s , f Qwer Payne Syndrome and Broo Park Decay Related Condition inipo willfully and intentiona oil this coil]!nunity by the Maplewood and Ramsey County Govemunents and Catholic Charities, Thank -- your fOr putting this item on the ap and Wr your help preparing this for cons- iderat.ion. Please contact ine with and cluestions. Sincerely, Before issuance of a building permit, the County shall provide concrete evidence of a negotiated agreement with the local school government regarding all logistical and financial ramifications incurred by this establishment. There shall be no increase in size or capacity of the structure. The County shall assume financial responsibility for all services provided to the residents of the Shelter that would normally be charged to the citizens. (Example: Ambulance and paramedic runs) All elements of the listed Emergency Housing Program Parameters shall remain in force unless a change is agreed to by the City Council at a subsequent C. U. P. review. The County shall arrange with the contractor to assure no loss of space or utilities, normally available to the 1999 Ramsey County Fair, shall occur. All heretofore and subsequent agreements regarding restitution and expansion of the area for County Fair purposes shall be completed before a certificate of occupancy is issued. The new access to the lower level as agreed upon by the fair board and the county shall be completed before the 1999 fair. Other improvements shall include but not be limited to legitimate handicapped access to the barn upper level, and all other improvements discussed in the fair board negotiations. Parking spaces on the North side of the designated East —West Van Dyke Ave. shall be redesigned in accordance with the concerns of the Fair Board in the use of this area. The new layout shall meet the approval of the fair board and the City.. Each year at a prearranged time before and during fair week, all these new parking areas shall be evacuated for use of the fair board at their discretion, if the use of these areas is an advantage to them. All disturbed electrical and other utilities, which affect the fair operation, shall be completely restored and ready for the 1999 fair. If at any time, the City Council determines there is a need, the County will contract for, or provide from their own staff, security patrols in the complex bounded by the Willard Munger Trail, White Bear Ave, Ripley Street, and the Goodrich Golf Course. Times and extent of the patrol will be established at that point in time. This Conditional Use Permit will be reviewed annually, and if in the opinion of the City Council, any evidence of negative repercussion to the area, or valid reason that the facility causes undue hardship to the residents has occurred, the city may revoke the Conditional Use Permit with no financial obligation to the city, and the normal amortization process would not apply. The County would then have one hundred and twenty (120) days to cease operations as a homeless shelter and devote the structure to an acceptable planned backup use such as elderly care. All portions of the conditional use permit and land use plan shall be agreed to, within fifteen days of City Council passage, by the County and a letter agreeing to all elements of the same shall be submitted to the city before issuance of a building permit. 1, TEL NO.777 -6277 1'«esday FebruaryU2, 1' 99 IV Mike McGhdrev Ph 7701 -4525 Fax 779-3570 Fr; Bob Ziek FIB 771 -8952 F ax 777-6277 Ru; Placement on the February 08, 1999 cOuntil agenda Dv. Mr. IV CGUit'C,1 Feb 02 99 9:56 P . 0 1 Agenda Item 144 Pcr 0111' coti'vcr-s{i.lion and mesist des over the JELM. week reglarding my request to be on theUCUiu11agendadiscussingthecriteriaforgrantiangconditionaluseermils. Simeraly, Bob dick