Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 08-14 City Council Packeti • i� Counc Workshop - 8114100 - Cancelled AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 14, 2000 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 00 -16 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Council/Manager Workshop Meeting (July 24, 2000) 2. Minutes of Meeting 00 -15 (July 24, 2000) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS G. CONSENT AGENDA I All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Towns of New Century Final Plat (New Century Boulevard, north of Highwood Avenue) 3. Surplus Property Disposal 4. Alcohol Compliance Grant 5. Temporary Gambling -Hill Murray School 6. Temporary Strong Beer and Wine License - Church of St. Jerome 7. Certification of Election Judges 8. Resolution Authorizing Execution of Sub -Grant Agreement H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. Comprehensive Plan Update - Historic Resources Management Plan (4 votes) 2. 7:15 P.M. Zoning Code Change - Business Commercial (BC) District I. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Public Works Building Roof - 1902 E. County Road B J. U ' 1IN UED BUSINESS NF IS S S 1. Highpoint Ridge (County Road D and Highway 61) A. Comprehensive Plan Changes - (4 votes) - R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) - Drop planned minor collector street B. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) C. Preliminary Plat D. No Parking for One Side of Private Streets and Driveways 2. Paintball Guns and Facilities 3. Deer Management Code_ Addition K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Establish Budget for Sod Repair, Gervais Avenue Improvements, Project 96 -02 2. Overnight Parking Ordinance 3. Cooperative Agreement, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Project 99 -02 4. Public Safety Dispatcher and Dispatch Supervisor Classes 5. 2001 Proposed Budget L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. St. Paul Police Outdoor Range - Linwood Avenue M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. O. ADJOURNMENT Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make arrangements. Assistant Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability. 9 City of Maplewood CITY COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP Meeting Minutes Monday, July 24, 2000 Council Chambers, Municipal Building 6:00 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Cardinal at 6:00 p.m. B. ROLL CALL C. 10 Mayor Robert Cardinal Present - Councilmember Sherry Allenspach Present Councilmember Kenneth Collins Present Councilmember Marvin Koppen Absent Councilmember Julie Wasiluk Present Others Present: Acting City Manager Kenneth Haider Finance Director Dan Faust City Clerk Karen Guilfoile APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the agenda as submitted. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Allenspach. The motion passed 4 -0. PRELIMINARY BUDGET DISCUSSION Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. Finance Director Faust presented the specifics of the report. A discussion followed. Finance Director Faust said that on September 15, 2000 the city needs to submit to Ramsey County what the planned tax increase will be for the year 2001. Mr. Faust will submit the budget to the council one. month prior to this date so that they will have time to go over it. E. OTHER BUSINESS None Y, ;� s F. F ' TURE TOPICS 1. Haj icek Property 2. Open Burning G. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Cardinal moved and Councilmember Wasiluk seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:40 p.m. bZ, MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 24, 2000 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 00 -15 A. CALL TO ORDER: A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: C. ROLL CALL: Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Absent Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Council /Manager Workshop (July 10, 2000) as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 00 -14 (July 10, 2000) as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilmember Collins moved to approve the Agenda as amended: M1. Special Meeting - August 1, 2000 at 8:00 p.m. with Crowns regarding the hiring process for the City Manager Position. M2. Ancom Communications in reference to 125 Motorola Pagers Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS: None 1 G. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all 1. Approval of Claims Approved the claims. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $1. Checks #8331 dated 7 -3 -00 $97,976.19 Checks #50490 thru #50579 dated 7 -11 -00 $320,8843.00 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 7 -5 thru 7 -10 -00 $290. Checks #8332 thru 98340 dated 7 -10 thru 7 -13 -00 $273,114.82 Checks #50582 thru #50688 dated 7 -18 -00 $124737.08 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 7 -11 thru 7 -17 -00 $3,996,195.60 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $328, Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 7 -7 -00 $24 Payroll Deduction check #79249 thru #79256 dated 7 -7 -00 _$352 Total Payroll _$4,348,815.51 GRAND TOTAL 2. 3. 11 Authorization for Program Participation Approved participation in an alcohol compliance program administered through the University of Minnesota. - Donation to Police Reserves Accepted $500 donation from the White Bear Avenue Business Association for the Maplewood Police Department Reserve Program. Conditional Use Permit Review - Preschool (47 Century Avenue South) Approved the review of the conditional use permit for a preschool at 47 Century Avenue South. This will not be reviewed again unless a problem arises or if the applicant proposes a change. 2 5. Conditional Use Permit Review -Excel Air Systems (2075 Prosperity Road) Approved the review of the conditional use permit for Excel Air Systems at 2075 Prosperity Road. This will not be reviewed again unless a problem arises or if the applicant proposes a change. 6. Change Order No. 3 for MCC and Final Acceptance of Fitness Expansion Project Approved Change Order No. 3 for $7,143.30 with the monies to be allocated from the city's park acquisition fund and accepted the project as recommended by the architect, city building official, and parks and recreation department director. 7. Budget Change - Youth Sports Clinics Approved the budget changes in the amount of $9,700 to pay for contracted services and to purchase program supplies for the youth sports clinics. 8. Budget Transfer - Recorder and Transcription Machine - City Clerk and City Council Approved the transfer of funds from the contingency account, not to exceed $3,700.00 for the purchase of replacement equipment per a quote from Lanier. H. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 7:00 P.M. (7:06 P.M.) US West Telecommunications Monopole (1194 County Road C) a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing. b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Boardmember Jon LaCasse presented the Community Design Review Board report. e. Chairperson Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. f. Mayor .Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following person was heard: David Shippee, Council President, Lakeview Lutheran Church g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. A. Conditional Use Permit Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use permit to allow up to a 75- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment. This approval is for the property at 1194 County Road C: 0J RESOLUTION 00 -07 -076 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Dale Casper, representing US West Wireless, applied for a conditional use permit to install up to a 75- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 1194 County Road C. The legal description is: Speiser's Arbolada, subject to road and vacated road accruing, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, in the north one -half of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN's 09- 29 -22 -11 -0050, 0051, 0052) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On July 6, 2000, the planning commission recommended approval of this request. 2. The city council held a public hearing on July 24, 2000. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 4 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plans dated May 26, 2000, as approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant or owner shall allow the collocation of other providers' telecommunications equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions. 5. Any antenna that is not used for a year shall be deemed abandoned and may be required to be removed. 6. The applicant or US West Wireless shall post a bond or other guarantee with the city to ensure proper removal of the antenna and monopole and the restoration of the site. 7. Before the city issues a building permit for this monopole, the church shall build a trash enclosure (as required by the 1994 CUP approval for the church) and restripe the parking lot. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -all B. Design Approval Councilmember Collins moved to approve the site and design plans date - stamped May 26, 2000, for up to a 75- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and equipment to the property at 1194 County Road C. Approval is based on the findin s required by code and subject to the applicant doing the followin . 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued permits for this proj ect. 2. Before the city issues a building permit, city staff must approve a landscaping plan for the property. This plan shall show the planting of a mix of Austrian Pine and Norway Pine trees to the northeast of the existing church parking lot on the hill. These trees are to help screen the base area from the homes along County Road C. These trees shall be at least eight feet tall, balled and burlapped and shall be planted in staggered rows. 3. If the landscaping or trees are not installed by the completion of the tower, the city shall require the applicant to provide a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed within six weeks of occupancy. 4. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 2. 7:10 P.M. (7:22 P.M.) Super America (1750 White Bear Avenue) a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing. b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Boardmember Jon LaCasse presented the Community Design Review Board report. e. Chairperson Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. f. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following person was heard: Michael Cronin, Michael Cronin & Associates, representing SuperAmerica g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. A. Building Setback Variance Mayor Cardinal moved to approve a 20 -foot, instead of a 15 -foot, buildin setback variance for SuperAmerica's proposed convenience store at 1750 White Bear Avenue based on the following: 1. There are circumstances that are unique to the property that warrant the proposed setback variance. The site is a V- shaped corner lot which makes it difficult to site a building and other improvements. R 2. The proposed 20 -foot setback will allow proper separation distances between fuel islands and store, and enhance circulation. 3. The proposed reduced setback would meet the spirit and intent of the code since visibility would not be obscured from the adjacent property to the northeast at their North St. Paul Road driveway. 4. The new facility will be an enhancement to the overall neighborhood and will move vent pipes farther away from neighbors. Seconded by Councilmember Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Allenspach, Wasiluk Nays - Councilmember Collins B. Conditional Use Permit Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution, approving a conditional use permit to rebuild and enlarge a motor fuel station at 1750 White Bear Avenue RESOLUTION 00 -07 -077 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, SuperAmerica Group, Inc. applied for a conditional use permit to enlarge their fuel station and convenience store. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1750 White Bear Avenue. The legal description is: ALL OF LOT EIGHT (8) EXCEPT THAT PART LYING NORTH OF AND NORTHEAST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINES: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT EIGHT (8) FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EAST ON A LINE 3.22 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT EIGHT (8) TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF A LINE 3.53 FEET SOUTHWEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT EIGHT (8); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON SAID LINE 3.53 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT EIGHT (8) TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT EIGHT (8), SAID LINE BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTH ST. PAUL ROAD, IN BLOCK ONE (1), MEISTER'S HIGHLANDS, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On July 6, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 7 2. The city council held a public hearing on July 24, 2000. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding fuel tanks, fuel spillage, monitoring wells, any contaminated soil, etc. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all C. Parking Reduction Authorization Councilmember Collins moved to approve a parking- reduction waiver to allow 11 parking spaces (five fewer than the code requires). The city approved this request because: 1. Most of the customers that would be in the store at a given time are fuel customers who would leave their cars at the pump islands. 2. A reduction in the parking requirements is justified to create more efficient traffic flow within the site. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all D. Design Approval Councilmember Collins moved to approve the site and design plans date - stamped July 5, 2000, for the redevelopment of the SuperAmerica fuel station and convenience store at 1750 White Bear Avenue. The owner shall do the following_ 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit: a. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. b. Plans for the design and placement of the trash enclosure. The trash enclosure shall be large enough for refuse containers and any recycling containers the applicant may use. The trash enclosure shall have gates that are 100 percent opaque and extend to the ground. C. A revised site plan showing: (1) A 20 -foot building setback from the North St. Paul Road right -of- way. (2) The driveway access on White Bear Avenue with a width of 36 feet to have an entrance lane, a lert -turn exit lane and aright -turn exit. These lanes shall be marked with painted arrows on the pavement depicting the turning movement. X 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. b. Install reflectorized stop signs at all exits and a handicap - parking sign for the handicap - parking space. C. Install and maintain an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas. d. Screen the roof -top mechanical equipment as proposed. e. The site lights shall not exceed the maximum light intensity required by code. The lights beneath the canopy shall be flush mount. The lenses must not drop below the bottom of the canopy. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. C. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5. This approval does not include the signs. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all I. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Lift Station No. 9, Project 99 -02 a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Allenspach introduced the Resolution for Award of Bid for the construction of City Proi ect 99 -02, Gravity Sanitary Sewer for Lift Station 9, to Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $558,783 and moved for its adoption: 10 RESOLUTION 00 -07 -078 RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $558,783 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of City Project 99 -02, Gravity Sanitary Sewer for Lift Station 9 and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Highpoint Ridge (County Road D and Highway 61) Acting City Manager Haider said the city received a letter from Frank Frattalone, the developer of the project, asking that his item be tabled until the August 14, 2000 council meeting. Councilmember Collins moved to table this item until the August 14, 2000 city council meeting Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Electrical Permit and Inspection Fees a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. b. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adopt the following resolution adopting a new electrical permit and fee schedule for Maplewood that follows the State of Minnesota Board of Electricity fee schedule: RESOLUTION 00 -07 -079 ELECTRICAL FEES RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Maplewood has adopted the Minnesota State Board of Electricity Rules by reference, except the fees. WHEREAS, the State Board of Electricity recently enacted a new fee schedule. 11 WHEREAS, the Section 9 -234 of the city code says that the city will set the fees for electrical permits and inspections by city council resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that Maplewood amends its fee schedule for electrical permits and inspections so that it conforms with the State Board of Electricity fee schedule. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 2. Public Safety Dispatching a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. b. :Finance Director Faust presented the specifics of the report. C. Mayor Cardinal opened this item to the public for discussion. The following persons were heard: John McNulty, 2029 Duluth Street, Maplewood Peter Fischer, 2443 Standridge Avenue, Maplewood Jeanette Hulet, 2021 Kenwood Drive West, Maplewood Dan Faust, Maplewood Finance Director, explained the previous dispatching costs. Willis Woldt, 1486 Gervais Avenue, Maplewood George Rossbach, 1406 East County Road C, Maplewood Richard Currie, 1937 Kenwood Avenue West, Maplewood Tom Campbell, 2472 Cypress Street, Maplewood Lowell Colliander, 1839 Barclay Street, Maplewood John Maslowski, 1004 S. Dennis Street, Maplewood Robert Fletcher, Jr., Ramsey County Sheriff Steve Heinz, 8539 Lake Jane Trail, Lake Elmo Greg Juenemann, 721 Mt. Vernon Avenue East, Maplewood Robert Vorwerk, 2306 E. Maple Lane, Maplewood Kathleen Juenemann, 721 Mt. Vernon Avenue East, Maplewood Fran Juker, 1965 Barclay Street, Maplewood Kevin Otto, 942 Demont Avenue East, Maplewood Elmer Svendsen, 1597 Frost Avenue, Maplewood Kevin Johnson, 4049 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale Fran Juker, second appearance Greg Juenemann, second appearance Robert Fletcher, Jr., second appearance George Rossbach, second appearance Robert Vorwerk, second appearance Kathleen Juenemann, second appearance Sally Dunn, 409 Hickory Lane, Oakdale Dick Dreger, retired Maplewood Police Officer d. Mayor Cardinal closed the discussion. 12 Councilmember Collins moved to have the dispatching services removed from Ramsey County effective January 1, 2001 and during the interim time have city staff report on the needed upgrades for equipment, the required number of personnel to make the city's system functional, and possible fundinsz sources. Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Allenspach and Collins Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Special Meeting on August 1, 2000 at 8:00 p.m. with Pat Crowns, from PDI, Inc., regarding the hiring process for the City Manager position. 2. Ancom Communications - 125 Motorola Pagers - Mayor Cardinal wanted to know who received these pagers. Acting City Manager Haider said they were given to the fire department personnel. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None O. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Collins moved to adjourn the meeting at 9: 35 P.M. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all Karen E. Guilfoile, City Clerk 13 AGENDA NO. G -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: August 7, 2000 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The Acting City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 7 -21 -00 $106,411.97 Checks #8342 thru #8346 dated 7 -18 thru 7 -19 -00 $531,083.37 Checks #50691 thru #50804 dated 7 -25 -00 $187,270.10 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 7 -18 thru 7 -24 -00 $34,525.07 Checks #8347 thru #8348 dated 7 -25 thru 7 -28 -00 $761,768.64: Checks #50807 thru #50911 dated 8 -1 -00 $108,325.88 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 7 -25 thru 7 -31 -00 $76,768.07 Checks #8349 thru #8350 dated 7 -28 thru 8 -1 -00 $62,497.16 Checks #50914 thru #50982 dated 8 -8 -00 $576,266.97 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 8 -1 thru 8 -7 -00 $2,444 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: $455,856.91 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 7 -21 -00 $23,181.74 Payroll Deduction check #79564 thru #79569 dated 7 -21 -00 $338,844.43 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 8 -4 -00 $24,689.30 Payroll Deduction check #79755 thru #79762 dated 8 -4 -00 $842,572.38 Total Payroll $ 3,287,489.61 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. hu Attachments C:\OFFICE\WP-DOCS\AGENDA\APCL0007.AUG VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 07/21/00 10:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 8342 07/18/00 830225 DANIEL G VEESENMEYER INSTALL SOFTCRETE 2,700.00 INSTALL SOFTCRETE 5 8,375.00 8343 07/18/00 761200 ROAD RESCUE, INC. NEW CURRENT PRODUCTION AMBUL 94,315.00 94,315.00 8344 07/19/00 941650 WILD MOUNTAIN TICKETS TO WILD MTN 290.00 290.00 8345 07/19/00 770802 RYDER BUS COMPANY BUS TO WILD MTN 235.00 235.00 8346 07/19/00 561050 MINNESOTA UC FUND 2ND QTR UNEMPLOYMENT 3 3 50691 07/25/00 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS REFUND OVERPMT ON UTILITIES 27,924.12 27,924.12 50692 07/25/00 COMMERCIAL UTILITIES, INC. REF - GRADING ESCROW 1749 500.00 500.00 50693 07/25/00 KRIS HILGERT REF-SWIM 40.00 40.00 50694 07/25/00 JODY PEDERSON REF -SWIM 80.00 80.00 50695 07/25/00 ROBERT SCHWARTZ REF -AMB 99024147 142.92 142.92 50696 07/25/00 HUMANA EMPLOYER HEALTH OVERPD AMB 00008652 290.08 290.08 50697 07/25/00 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA REF - CASCADE BAY 23.00 23.00 50698 07/25/00 KENT LANZ REF - STATE TOURNAMENT 110.00 110.00 50699 07/25/00 VINCENT WINTERS OVERPMT ON MEMBERSHIP 30.00 30.00 50700 07/25/00 GENEVIEVE SCHNALTH REF-PARTIAL MEMBERSHIP 35.00 35.00 50701 07/25/00 JOHN G CORCORAN REF - DEP ON BANQUET RM 250.00 250.00 50702 07/25/00 PAT GOFF REF PRELIM PLAT APPLICATION 1,273.00 1,273.00 50703 07/25/00 010467 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES CELLULAR 5/15-6/15 15.28 CELLULAR 3/15 -4/15 22.58 CELLULAR 3/15 -4/15 22.58- CELLULAR 5115 -6/15 103.04 CELLULAR 5/15 -6/15 11.36 129.68 50704 07/25/00 010685 AD SHARE INC AD SHARE 209.05 209.05 50705 07/25/00 020005 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC. REPAIR M1 209.81 209.81 50706 07/25/00 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MATS - PD 37.88 37.88 50707 07/25/00 021700 AMOCO OIL COMPANY FUEL 53.67 53.67 50708 07/25/00 030310 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PAGER REPAIRS 342.69 342.69 r VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 07/21/00 10:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50709 07/25/00 030420 EVERETT A ANDERSON MILEAGE 52.08 52.08 50710 07/25/00 030730 ANOKA HENNEPIN TECH COLLEGE AUTO EXTRICATION TRAINING 330.00 330.00 50711 07/25/00 041005 ARDEN SHOREVIEW ANIMAL HOSP K9 VET SERVICES 44.00 44.00 50712 07/25/00 050600 AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS, INC. REPAIR SQUAD WINDOW 181.06 181.06 50713 07/25/00 061100 BANNIGAN & KELLY P.A. JUNE LEGAL 10,202.04 10,202.04 50714 07/25/00 080925 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS UTILITIES 6/2-6/30 59.40 UTILITIES 6/2 -6/30 28.80 UTILITIES 6/2 -6/30 100.37 UTILITIES 6/2 -6/30 809.93 998.50 50715 07/25/00 110860 CHRIS CAVETT JUNE MILEAGE 14.56 JULY MILEAGE 15.28 29.84 50716 07/25/00 120650 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES ELECTRA COAT AEROSOL 203.55 203.55 50717 07/25/00 151855 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE SEAL COAT AD 99.20 99.20 50718 07/25/00 152400 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. INKJET COLOR BOND PAPER 75.60 75.60 50719 07/25/00 170200 CUB FOODS- MAPLEWOOD EAST RESERVES DETAIL WORK 160.64 160.64 50720 07/25/00 180390 DADCO FOOD PRODUCTS MDSE. FOR RESALE 80.40 MDSE. FOR RESALE 321.60 402.00 50721 07/25/00 181750 DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING INC PROJ 99 -13 PAYMENT #2 101,890.80 PROJ 99-13 PAYMENT #2 5 96,796.26 50722 07/25/00 190070 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SRVS COPIER LEASE 360.27 COPIER LEASE 90.07 450.34 50723 07/25/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 505.00 505.00 50724 07/25/00 190500 DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 2ND QTR MDT PMT 1,920.00 2ND QTR MDT PMT 1,350.00 3 50725 07/25/00 200900 DITCH WITCH OF MN INC 4 COUPLER SETS 237.78 237.78 50726 07/25/00 230220 EDI CO. ZEBRA BARCODE SCAN 246.52 246.52 50727 07/25/00 230960 ECOPRINT BUS CARDS-CALLAHAN,SOUTH OFF 90.54 BUS CARDS- CARVER,OSTROM 90.55 181.09 50728 07/25/00 234475 ELECTRIC PUMP INC SEWAGE EJECTION PUMPS 11,470.51 11,470.51 50729 07/25/00 240150 ELSMORE AQUATIC MDSE. FOR RESALE 216.15 216.15 2 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 07/21/00 10 :09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50730 07/25/00 240375 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. SERVICE ENGINE 4 3 3 50731 07/25/00 260250 FACILITY SYSTEMS,INC. MOUSE TRAY /TOOLBAR 61.98 61.98 50732 07/25/00 260286 FAMILY SERVICE, INC. 7/1- 12/31,2000 FEES 18 18,797.50 50733 07/25/00. 260400 DANIEL FAUST AIRFARE -MTA CONFERENCE 391.00 391.00 50734 07/25/00 260660 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSOC OF MINN ESSENTIALS OF FIREFIGHTING 535.86 535.86 50735 07/25/00 260756 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY INTIAL FEE 100.00 6 MTH AGENT FEE 87.50 187.50 50736 07/25/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 8.50 MATS 27.00 MATS 127.80 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 21.53 FEES FOR SERVICE 43.35 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 78.33 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 40.79 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 8.50 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 34.00 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 10.55 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 25.58 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 11.81 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 66.81 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 8.50 MATS 34.00 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 10.55 562.79 50737 07/25/00 301687 JAMIE GERARD PRINTER INK CARTRIDGES 29.80 29.80 50738 07/25/00 310840 GOVSTORE USA CRYSTAL REPORTS 265.53 265.53 50739 07/25/00 320240 GRACE, DUANE PERMIT FEE 1 1 50740 07/25/00 320265 GRAFIX SHOPPE RADAR TRAILER MARKINGS 245.00 245.00 50741 07/25/00 350472 HILLTOP TRAILER SALES INC JULY RENTAL 410.03 410.03 50742 07/25/00 352000 HTC STATE FIRE SCHOOL STATE FIRE SCHOOL - 4 280.00 280.00 50743 07/25/00 370100 ANN HUTCHINSON MILEAGE 29.42 FUEL FOR FIELD TRIP 37.32 PARKING 8.00 74.74 50744 07/25/00 380175 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS FIELD MARKING PAINT 1 1 50745 07/25/00 390101 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #622 DRIVER TRAINING 115.50 115.50 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 07/27/00 10:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD OT VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50746 07/25/00 390104 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #622 GYM RENTAL - BASKETBALL 4 4,702.50 50747 07/25/00 400788 JAMES STEELE CONSTRUCTION MCC EXPANSION 47,494.00 MCC EXPANSION 2,375.00 - MCC EXPANSION 45,138.00 MCC EXPANSION 2,257.00- 88,000.00 50748 07/25/00 410370 KATH COMPANIES WIRE FOR HITCH 12.59 7000 UNLEADED FUEL 8,762.95 8,775.54 50749 07/25/00 420150 KINKO'S CUSTOMER ADM SERVICES NNO- HEALTH CARE MAILERS 22.37 22.37 50750 07/25/00 430350 KNOX LUMBER CO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 22.14 22.14 50751 07/25/00 440110 KRINKIE HTG & AIR CONDITIONING A/C CHECK AT ST 4 83.00 83.00 50752 07/25/00 450380 LAKELAND TRUCK CENTER, INC. REPAIR M1 193.60 193.60 50753 07/25/00 470700 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS CD CLERK EMPLOY AD 258.00 PUBLIC NOTICES 170.44 428.44 50754 07/25/00 470720 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT, INC. WATER BASKETBALL EQUIP 537.90 WATER BASKETBALL EQUIP 29.77- 508.13 50755 07/25/00 470730 LINDSTROM CLEANING & CONSTRUCT CLEAN ST 4 AFTER FIRE 27,274.90 27,274.90 50756 07/25/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY MDSE. FOR RESALE 455.77 455.77 50757 07/25/00 511600 MASYS CORP AUG SOFTWARE MAINT 704.25 704.25 50758 07/25/00 511770 MAWP MEMBERSHIP - DUNN 25.00 25.00 50759 07/25/00 520450 MCCOLLISTER & CO. GEAR LUBE 79.10 79.10 50760 07/25/00 530070 MEADOW VIEW HOMES REF-GRADING ESCROW 2487 1 REF- GRADING ESCROW 2487 18.49 1 1 018.49 50761 07/25/00 530730 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 543.57 543.57 50762 07/25/00 540152 MID-MINNESOTA WIRE TURNOUT STORAGE LOCKERS /EQUIP 5 TURNOUT STORAGE LOCKERS /EQUIP 366.76 TURNOUT STORAGE LOCKERS /EQUIP 5,163.87 TURNOUT STORAGE LOCKERS /EQUIP 366.76 TURNOUT STORAGE LOCKERS /EQUIP 2,929.51 TURNOUT STORAGE LOCKERS /EQUIP 73.36 TURNOUT STORAGE LOCKERS /EQUIP 5 TURNOUT STORAGE LOCKERS /EQUIP 381.43 19,903.37 50763 07/25/00 540175 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. MDSE. FOR RESALE 197.10 MDSE. FOR RESALE 255.25 452.35 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 07/21/00 10:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50764 07/25/00 542455 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 86.58 86.58 50765 07/25/00 660800 NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF 6/9 -7/6 1,533.14 6/15 -7/15 178.05 6/15 -7/15 223.87 6/15-7/15 218.29 2 50766 07/25/00 660900 NORTH STAR TURF, INC. SEAL KITS 298.14 ORANGE PAINT 314.18 612.32 50767 07/25/00 661600 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO. EV 1000 HONDA GENERATOR 745.49 745.49 50768 07/25/00 690340 ARNOLD G OLSON MILEAGE 54.88 PLAN REVIEW /CONSULT 755.00 809.88 50769 07/25/00 691160 ON SITE SANITATION JULY 4TH SANITATION 445.20 445.20 50770 07/25/00 691793 MARJORIE OSTROM STATE SEMINAR-NC,MO 80.00 80.00 50771 07/25/00 712100 PITNEY BOWES INC. SOFTGUARD RATE PLAN 237.00 EQUIP MAINT - ELEC SCALE 300.00 EQUIP MAINT- MAILING MACH 1 2,002.00 50772 07/25/00 740320 RDJ SPECIALTIES, INC. PENCILS /BINOCULARS-NNO 747.73 ERASERS -NNO 261.60 1,009.33 50773 07/25/00 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY-PRRREV POSTAL VERIFCATION CARDS 342.00 342.00 50774 07/25/00 742150 RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS & REC. SNOWMOBILE STAGE-NNO 256.50 256.50 50775 07/25/00 750500 REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL & LUBE CAR WASHES 64.42 CAR WASHES 13.08 CAR WASHES 16.54 CAR WASHES 7.54 101.58 50776 07/25/00 750550 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS MDSE. FOR RESALE 298.62 MDSE. FOR RESALE 271.03 MDSE. FOR RESALE 170.64 740.29 50777 07/25/00 761340 ROCKHURST COLLEGE CE CENTER ADOBE CLASS-P POWELL 195.00 195.00 50778 07/25/00 762130 ROSEVILLE FIRE GROUND ACCT NAME TAGS 12.00 12.00 50779 07/25/00 770802 RYDER BUS COMPANY BUS TRIP - VALLEY FAIR 252.00 252.00 50780 07/25/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE 137.34 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 40.32 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 26.90 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 40.77 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 62.87 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 43.32 5 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 07/21/00 10:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK.: CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER Y., 'DATE . NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT SUPPLIES - OFFICE 40.29- 311.23 50781 07/25/00 '820207 SIGN-A -RAMA MAGNETIC SIGNS FOR PARADE - 193.10 193.10 50782 07/25/00 820300 PROFESSIONAL MASSAGE CENTER JUNE MASSAGES - 3,493.00 3,493.00 50783 07/25/00 820503 SMITH DIVING SCUBA INSTRUC /SNORKELING 480:00` 480.00 50784 07/25/00 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF RADIO SERVICE 330.81 RADIO SERVICE 663.25 HYDRANT FEB -MAY 63.90 WATER FEB -MAY 52.20 MEDIC SUPPLIES 2,839.50 3 50785 07/25/00 840651 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISING 2 2 50786 07/25/00 850340 SUMMIT INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS 2 INSPECTIONS 2,541.00 INSPECTIONS 2 .2,032.80 50787 07/25/00 850677 SUPREME AUDIO, INC. SWEATBANDS /WINDSCREEN 82.53 SWEATBANDS /WINDSCREEN 4.73- 77.80 50788 07/25/00 860080 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC PROD 99 -07 PMT #2 172,403.15 PROJ 99-07 PMT #2 8,620.16- 163,782.99 50789 i 07125/00 860305 T.J.T. - SHIRTS TSHIRTS & SWEATSHIRTS 196.35 196.35 50790 07/25/00 860320 T.R.F. SUPPLY CO. GLOVES 220.45 GLOVES,RAIN SUITS 229.90 450.35 50791 07/25/00 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA ACCTS REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 22.17 i PROGRAM SUPPLIES 35.10 57.27 50792 07/25/00 860725 TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PHONE SUPPORT 22.00 22.00 50793 07/25/00 861618 THE ENGRAVING SHOP 2 TROPHIES 15.00 15.00 50794 07/25/00 862710 TIME WARNER CABLE 7/15 -8/14 109.79 109.79 50795 07/25/00 871175 TOM'S MOBIL SERVICE WATER CRAFT FUEL 42.08 42.08 50796 07/25/00 882830 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVE TOW Al AT STATION 1 90.00 90.00 50797 07/25/00 900160 UNITED BROADCASTING BROADCASTING 249.00 BROADCASTING 174.00 423.00 50798 07/25/00 900180 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE 3 3 50799 07/25/00 910535 VECTOR INTERNET SERVICES 6/19-7/19 WEB SPACE 24.00 24.00 m VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 7 07/21/00 10:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 50800 07/25/00 912100 VIRTUE PRINTING 50801 07/25/00 920625 VOYAGEUR ASSEST MGMT, LLC 50802 07/25/00 931300 WILLIAM P. WALSH 50803 07/25/00 934170 THE WATSON CO INC 50804 07/25/00 940583 TOM WESTLING ITEM DESCRIPTION BLDG PERMIT CARDS 4TH QTR FEE-INVESTING COMM PLBG INSPECTIONS COMM PLBG INSPECTIONS COMM PLBG INSPECTIONS MDSE. FOR RESALE TENNIS INSTRUCTOR II TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AMOUNT 132.04 781.00 59.00 73.75 73.75- 337.52 607.50 CHECK AMOUNT 132.04 781.00 59.00 337.52 607.50 637, 495.34 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Pa ee Description Amount 07/17/00 07/18/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 765.00 07/17/00 07/18/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 17,181.50 07/14/00 07/18/00 CBSA Dental claims 4 07/18/00 07/19/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 829.50 07/18/00 07/19/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 9 07/14/00 07/19/00 Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items 2 07/11/00 07/19/00 MN Dept of Revenue Sales Tax 5 `07/19/00 07/20/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 710.00 07/19/00 07/20/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 14,065.59 07/20/00 07/21/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 450.50 07/20/00 07/21/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 8,097.00 07/12/00 07/21/00 MN Dept of Revenue Fuel Tax 188.00 07/21/00 07/24/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 614.75 07/21/00 07/24/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 13,890.43 07/21/00 07/24/00 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 107,969.69 TOTAL 187,270.10 7 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 1 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER 07/28/00 08:08 FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ ITEM ITEM CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 8347 07/25/00 722200 P.E.R.A. 8348 07/28/00 630018 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 ITEM ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT P/R DED REMIT 7 -21-00 15,149.58 P/R DED REMIT 7 -21 -00 19,162.49 34,312.07 PERA LIFE INS P/R DED IN JUL 201.00 MCGUIRE, MIKE 12.00 213.00 TOTAL CHECKS 34,525.07 L�:elol VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 07/28/00 08 :44 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50807 08/01/00 GONYEA HOMES REF - GRADING 1026 SEXTANT AVE 1 REF - GRADING 1026 SEXTANT AVE 97.12 REF - 2480 OAK CIRCLE 1 REF - 2480 OAK CIRCLE 38.77 REF - GRADING 2563 MONTANA AVE 1 REF - GRADING 2563 MONTANA AVE 29.32 REF - GRADING 1400 MARY ST 1 REF - GRADING 1400 MARY ST 22.19 REF - GRADING 2553 MONTANA AVE 1 REF - GRADING 2553 MONTANA AVE 17.81 5,205.21 50808 08/01/00 KD HOMES REF - GRADING 699 FERNDALE SO 1 REF - GRADING 699 FERNDALE SO 11.64 1,011.64 50809 08/01/00 KATHY GINTER REFUND - SWIM 80.00 80.00 50810 08/01/00 CLINT WALLER REFUND - SWIM 60.00 60.00 50811 08/01/00 ANN HAWKINS REFUND - SWIM 60.00 60.00 50812 08/01/00 CHARLES ZDRAZIL REF - CANC ELEC PRMT 00 - 01440 30.00 REF - CANC ELEC PRMT 00 - 01440 .50 30.50 50813 08/01/00 DAWN FISHER REFUND - PLAYGROUND FUN 7.50 7.50 50814 08/01/00 JEFF JOHNSON REF - DRAMA CAMP 150.00 150.00 50815 08/01/00 CHERYL ERLER REFUND - SOFTBALL 40.00 40.00 50816 08/01/00 KARI KAULFUSS REFUND - 3 CAMPS 45.00 45.00 50817 08/01/00 COLLEEN CALLAHN REFUND - DAY CAMP 75.00 75.00 50818 08/01/00 THERESE THOMAS REFUND - SWIM 30.00 30.00 50819 08/01/00 HOLLY URBANSKI REFUND - SWIM 30.00 30.00 50820 08/01/00 LANDBORG & SONS REF - GRADING 2301 UPPER AFTON 15,000.00 REF - GRADING 2301 UPPER AFTON 894.11 15 50821 08/01/00 010467 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES CELL PHONES 275.72 275.72 50822 08/01/00 020005 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC. 500 POLICE DECALS 133.13 133.13 50823 08/01/00 020400 AIR FILTERS UNLIMITED TRI 15/40 LINK 275.23 TRI - DEK 15/40 LINK 225.20 500.43 50824 08/01/00 020870 ALLIED MEDICAL ACCTS CONTROL PYMT DUE ON CONTRACT 270.23 270.23 50825 08/01/00 020900 ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC WIRED EXIT & EMERGENCY LIGHTS 1 1, 496.00 �l VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 07/28/00 08:44 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50826 08/01/00 020954 ALPHA BITS PERFORMANCES 255.00 255.00 50827 08/01/00 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MATS 37.70 37.70 50828 08/01/00 021465 AMERICAN RED CROSS MASKS /TEXT /PROF RESCUER 336.60 MASKS /TEXT /PROF RESCUER 20.55- 316.05 50829 08/01/00 030250 ANACOMP INC MICROFILM MACHINE PAPER 150.13 150.13 50830 08/01/00 030310 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. REPAIR TO PAGERS 125.48 125.48 50831 08/01/00 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC. FEES FOR SERVICE 721.51 721.51 50832 08/01/00 031405 AQUA LOGIC, INC. POOL CHEMICALS 694.49 POOL CHEMICALS 1,156.11 1,850.60 50833 08/01/00 090797 TOM BROCKWAY CHEMICAL AWARENESS SUPPLIES 159.75 CHEMICAL AWARENESS SUPPLIES 9.75- 150.00 50834 08/01/00 101500 MORLEY AND BETH BURNETT AUDIO, VISUAL EQUIP INSTALLED 5,645.30 5 50835 08/01/00 110870 CBSA MONTHLY ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 513.40 513.40 50836 08/01/00 120525 CENTURY COLLEGE PARAMEDIC SCHOOL 20.00 20.00 50837 08/01/00 151330 COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES INC. SERVICE PARTS WASHER 45.26 45.26 50838 08/01/00 170200 CUB FOODS-MAPLEWOOD EAST COLE SLAW /SALAD /CHIPS /ICE CRM 280.28 280.28 50839 08/01/00 180800 DALCO SHMPO /DSNFCTNT /TOWELS /CLNR 267.43 SHMPO /DSNFCTNT /TOWELS /CLNR 218.79 SUPPLIES FOR STAT 7 293.70 CARPET CLEANERS 30.18 CARPET CLEANERS 24.70 CARPET CLNR 36.90 CARPET CLNR 30.20 CLNRS /SHMPO /TWLS 430.29 CLNRS /SHMPO /TWLS 352.06 1 50840 08/01/00 181900 DAY TIMERS, INC. PLANNER 40.98 40.98 50841 08/01/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 418.00 418.00 50842 08/01/00 190500 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY TUITION - KARIS 40.00 40.00 50843 08/01/00 210273 DON MARTY'S LANDSCAPING REDO HAZELWOOD SOCCER FIELDS 5 5,000.00 50844 08/01/00 210950 ALICE DUNN CLOTHING 65.99 65.99 50845 08/01/00 230900 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO. KODAK COPIER USAGE - MAY 2000 67.00 KODAK COPIER USAGE - MAY 2000 67.00 ill] VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 07/28/00 08:44 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT KODAK COPIER USAGE - MAY 2000 2.20 KODAK COPIER USAGE - MAY 2000 86.56 KODAK COPIER USAGE - MAY 2000 180.34 KODAK COPIER USAGE - MAY 2000 160.28 KODAK COPIER USAGE - MAY 2000 38.21 KODAK COPIER USAGE - MAY 2000 73.72 KODAK COPIER USAGE - MAY 2000 179.23 KODAK COPIER USAGE - MAY 2000 148.44 1 50846 08/01/00 240375 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. REPAIR TO L1 94.26 94.26 50847 08/01/00 280200 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. MONTHLY PREM - AUGUST 2000 2,050.37 2 50848 08/01/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.40 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 64.06 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.40 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 54.58 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 40.79 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 78.33 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 25.58 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 11.13 UNIFORMS 89.06 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 8.50 MATS 23.50 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 21.05 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 132.46 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 25.58 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 40.79 MATS 43.35 752.75 50849 08/01/00 300550 GE CAPITAL KODAK COPIER LEASE JUNE 2000 35.29 KODAK COPIER LEASE JUNE 2000 35.29 KODAK COPIER LEASE JUNE 2000 1.26 KODAK COPIER LEASE JUNE 2000 45.59 KODAK COPIER LEASE JUNE 2000 94.99 KODAK COPIER LEASE JUNE 2000 84.23 KODAK COPIER LEASE JUNE 2000 20.13 KODAK COPIER LEASE JUNE 2000 38.83 KODAK COPIER LEASE JUNE 2000 94.42 KODAK COPIER LEASE JUNE 2000 78.29 528.32 50850 08/01/00 310230 GOODIN COMPANY VALVE /STRAINERS 150.31 VALVE /STRAINERS 122.98 273.29 50851 08/01/00 320265 GRAFIX SHOPPE CUSTOM MARKING KIT FOR NEW AMB 1 1 50852 08/01/00 320266 GRAINGER RESPIRATOR 18.42 RESPIRATOR 15.07 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 18.42 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 15.07 66.98 11 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 07/28/00 08:44 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50853 08/01/00 320505 GROUND ZERO QUAD & HAMMY STRAPS 83.07 83.07 50854 08/01/00 330409 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT POOL CLNR /AQUA CART 4,632.76 4,632.76 50855 08/01/00 330680 HEALTHPARTNERS MNTHLY PREM DUE - AUGUST 2000. 4 MNTHLY PREM DUE - AUGUST 2000 20,541.97 MNTHLY PREM DUE - AUGUST 2000 4,246.73 29,785.85 50856 08/01/00 330810 PATRICK HEFFEMAN PVC PIPE OF SCBA IN F2 & R2 29.98 29.98 50857 08/01/00 350895 HOLIDAY FLEET CAR WASHES 6.36 6.36 50858 08/01/00 351275 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY POOL CHEMICALS 116.63 116.63 50859 08/01/00 390101 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #622 REIMB FOR CUSTODIAN CALL BACK 49.24 49.24 50860 08/01/00 390107 INDEPENDENT SPORTS NETWORK SOFTBALL UMPIRING 7 -10 TO 7 -24 2,652.00 2 50861 08/01/00 401635 ROCKY JOHNSON TEACHING CLINIC -TBALL COACHES 75.00 75.00 50862 08/01/00 401639 VELDA M JOHNSON PROJ 98 -10 FINANCIAL COMP/TREE 300.00 300.00 50863 08/01/00 440110 KRINKIE HTG & AIR CONDITIONING A/C COMPRESSOR 2,280.00 2 50864 08/01/00 450140 L.T.G. POWER EQUIPMENT LAWN MOWER BLADE 16.13 16.13 50865 08/01/00 460000 SHERRIE L LE TELEPHONE 16.60 16.60 50866 08/01/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 103.25 103.25 50867 08/01/00 511180 MARKO AUTO SERVICE REPAIR AC 601 66.78 REPAIR AC 602 180.47 247.25 50868 08/01/00 511790 MAX STEININGER INC PROJ 8828 FIRE STAT PYMT #1 61,900.00 -PROD 8828 FIRE STAT PYMT #1 3 58,805.00 50869 08/01/00 520400 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY CONTROL PANEL-HAZELWOOD PK 1,121.19 1,121.19 50870 08/01/00 520460 ELIZABETH MCCUSKER MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 16.89 16.89 50871 08/01/00 520500 MICHAEL MCGUIRE CAR ALLOWANCE 450.00 450.00 50872 08/01/00 530100 MEDICA CHOICE MONTHLY PREMIUM - AUGUST 2000 4,890.92 MONTHLY PREMIUM - AUGUST 2000 24,924.53 MONTHLY PREMIUM - AUGUST 2000 3 33,222.93 50873 08/01/00 530755 METROCALL DIGITAL PAGER - JULY 2000 10.46 PAGER RENTAL /SERVICE 22.57 33.03 50874 08/01/00 531650 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER - AUGUST 2000 147,032.00 147,032.00 12 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 07/28/00 08:44 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER / CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50875 08/01/00 531920 MICHAEL'S STORES INC. POPSICLES /YARN /BEADS /PAPER 27.51 27.51 50876 08/01/00 540179 MIDWEST LOCK & SAFE, INC. REPAIR LOCKS ON MAIN ENTRANCE 1 1,236.39 50877 08/01/00 540804 MINNEAPOLIS PLANETARIUM PLANETARIUM ADMISSION 200.00 200.00 50878 08/01/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO DEVELOP FILM 8.14 PHOTO DEVELOPING 4.46 12.60 50879 08/01/00 542679 MINUTEMAN PRESS STICKERS FOR BRO 50.14 50.14 50880 08/01/00 551100 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY PREM DUE - AUGUST 2000 347.78 MONTHLY PREM DUE - AUGUST 2000 1 MONTHLY PREM DUE - AUGUST 2000 961.75 MONTHLY PREM DUE - AUGUST 2000 19.23 2,556.82 50881 08/01/00 620600 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER CREDIT - 8 LAMPS 103.10 - CREDIT - 8 LAMPS 84.34- LAMPS 150.22 LAMPS 122.90 LAMPS 148.04 LAMPS 121.11 354.83 50882 08/01/00 630638 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE PASSPORT CAMERA FILM 452.51 452.51 50883 08/01/00 630775 NATURAL RESOURCES RESTORATION JOY PARK - BUCKTHORN CLEANUP 240.00 240.00 50884 08/01/00 661108 NORTH STAR WIPER & INDUSTRIAL PAPER PRODUCTS 247.36 PAPER PRODUCTS 202.38 CAN LINERS 42.50 COFFEE CUPS 163.34 CAN LINERS 34.78 COFFEE CUPS 133.64 824.00 50885 08/01/00 670950 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC CITY NEWS - AUGUST 1,280.24 1,280.24 50886 08/01/00 690340 ARNOLD G OLSON MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 91.33 91.33 50887 08/01/00 700800 PAPER WAREHOUSE, INC. BALLOONS /NAPKINS /PLATES /ETC 141.66 141.66 50888 08/01/00 721185 PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC 1/2 BILLING FOR AUGUST 50.00 50.00 50889 08/01/00 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY-PRRREV TH120 & CONWAY 51.23 TH 120 & 3M ROAD 128.04 TH 36 & ENGLISH 284.60 SIGNAL MAINT TH120 /HARVESTER 25.61 489.48 50890 08/01/00 742200 RAMSEY - WASHINGTON METRO DIST SEDGE ID WORKSHOP (8) 400.00 400.00 50891 08/01/00 750350 REASON COMPUTER 3 PCS & MONITORS 4,735.63 4,735.63 13 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 07/28/00 08:44 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50892 08/01/00 761313 ROCHESTER MIDLAND DEODORIZER SERVICE 81.95 81.95 50893 08/01/00 762205 DR. JAMES ROSSINI FITNESS CONSULTING FEE - JUNE 100.00 FITNESS CONSULTING FEE - JULY 100.00 200.00 50894 08/01/00 770802 RYDER BUS COMPANY BUS RENTAL - CASADE WATER PARK 252.00 BUS FEE 190.00 442.00 50895 08/01/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE 95.14 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 31.47 126.61 50896 08/01/00 780350 S.E.H. NEW FIRE STAT DESIGN - MAR2000 65 65 50897 08/01/00 780650 SAN LUCAS MISSION 2 PKGS COFFEE 13.59 13.59 50898 08/01/00 790200 SCHROEDER MILK COMPANY, INC. NNO ICE CREAM SUNDAE CUPS 115.20 115.20 50899 08/01/00 810360 SHEA TECHNOLOGIES 24 PORT SWITCHES /MODULES /RACK 2 700 MHZ PIII RACK MT FILE SRVR 8 10,878.98 50900 08/01/00 820307 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY PYMT FOR YOUTH BASEBALL CAMP 576.00 576.00 50901 08/01/00 842500 STATE OF MINNESOTA INSP CERT BOOKS 50.00 50.00 50902 08/01/00 843655 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC SUPPLIES FAX /COPIER BY REC 49.10 SUPPLIES FAX /COPIER BY REC 615.62 664.72 50903 08/01/00 850676 SURE STOP FLOOR SAFETY, INC. 2- 5 GAL PAILS PEX 129.80 129.80 50904 08/01/00 860080 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC BITUMINOUS MATERIALS 346.50 346.50 50905 08/01/00 860410 TSE, INC. JANITORIAL SRVS 635.55 635.55 50906 08/01/00 880750 TROY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES GLASS CLEANER /SOAP 80.37 GLASS CLEANER /SOAP 65.74 146.11 50907 08/01/00 890053 U.S. DIARY NNO /COMMUNITY POLICE SUPPLIES 285.96 285.96 50908 08/01/00 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 120.57 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 70.15 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 38.34 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 13.50 FLASHLIGHT BATTERY 24.50 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 73.00 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 99.00 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 16.40 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 142.18 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 36.45 - UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 130.98 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 99.90 BADGES 1 1 545.87 14 VOUCHRE2 07/28/00 08:44 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 50909 08/01/00 900175 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 50910 08/01/00 901350 HOLLY URBANSKI 50911 08/01/00 943608 CITY OF WOODBURY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIFORMS & CLOTHING VEST UNIFORMS & CLOTHING UNIFORMS & CLOTHING UNIFORMS & CLOTHING VEST UNIFORMS & CLOTHING UNIFORMS & CLOTHING POSTAGE FOR MPWD IN MOTION MILEAGE REIMB - REPLENISH PC PROJ 95 -11 CENTURY & LINWOOD TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AMOUNT 27.74 600.00 37.28 37.28- 47.93 600.00 197.95 46.70 6,000.00 4.70 328,381.06 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 3,858.26 6,000.00 4.70 328,381.06 761,768.64 15 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date w ee Description Amount 07/24/00 07/25/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 580.50 07/24/00 07/25/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 17,148.48 07/21/00 07/25/00 CBSA Dental claims 1 07/24/00 07/25/00 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 19,272.05 07/25/00 07/26/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 572.00 07/25/00 07/26/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 12,234.46 07/21/00 07/26/00 Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items 5 07/26/00 07/27/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 488.50 07/26/00 07/27/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 10,766.71 07/27/00 07/28/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 498.00 07/27/00 07/28/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 25,640.28 07/24/00 07/28/00 WI Dept of Revenue State Payroll Tax 1 07/28/00 07/31/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 491.00 07/28/00 07/31/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 13,144.22 TOTAL 108 16 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 08/01/00 08:13 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 8349 07/28/00 110441 CAPITOL TITLE INSURANCE INC TRANSFER TITLE FOR LAND DONATE 1,816.59 1,816.59 TOTAL CHECKS 1 1 816.59 17 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 08/04/00 10:39 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE. NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 8350 08/01/00 110460 CAREFREE COTTAGES OF MPLWD TAX INCREMENT 1ST HALF 2000 TX 14,996.35 TAX INCREMENT 1ST HALF 2000 TX 12,403.73 TAX INCREMENT 1ST HALF 2000 TX 47,551.40 74,951.48 50914 08/08/00 HEALTH PARTNERS REFUND - L JOHNSON 00011116 705.50 705.50 50915 08/08/00 CORINNA MORSE REFUND - SWIM 30.00 30.00 50916 08/08/00 CONNIE ASP REFUND - SWIM 30.00 30.00 50917 08/08/00 PATTY GUZIK REFUND - FALL SOCCER 40.00 40.00 50918 08/08/00 LYNN TOWLE REFUND - DAY CAMP 95.00 REFUND - DAY CAMP 95.00 190.00 50919 08/08/00 DUFF KRUEGER REFUND - PARTIAL MEMBERSHIP 39.94 39.94 50920 08/08/00 BILL SCHMIDT REFUND - GRADING 2124 BRADLEY 1 REFUND - GRADING 2124 BRADLEY 93.29 1,093.29 50921 08/08/00 020411 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEVUE CELL PHONES 377.64 CELL PHONE THRU 7/20/00 31.11 CELL PHONE 257.09 CELL PHONE 48.00 CELL PHONE 43.90 CELL PHONES 6.08 CELL PHONE - MO CHARGE 30.78 - CELL PHONE - MO CHARGE 15.92 810.52 50922 08/08/00 020900 ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC INSTALL 2 4 PLEX RCPT IN MCC 235.00 235.00 50923 08/08/00 020954 ALPHA BITS 3 PERFORMANCES 255.00 255.00 50924 08/08/00 021465 AMERICAN RED CROSS AUTHORIZED PROVIDER FEE 200.00 200.00 50925 08/08/00 030420 EVERETT A ANDERSON MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 70.85 70.85 50926 08/08/00 030640 ANDON INC. HELIUM TANK RENTAL 8.52 HELIUM TANK 36.00 44.52 50927 08/08/00 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC. PATROL & BOARDING FEES 1,523.67 1 50928 08/08/00 041500 ASPEN MILLS UNIFORMS 486.50 486.50 50929 08/08/00 081250 BRAD RAGAN INC. TIRES 558.23 558.23 50930 08/08/00 120525 CENTURY COLLEGE EMT SCHOOL - UBEL 480.86 480.86 50931 08/08/00 151855 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE AD FOR BID PROJ 99 -02 330.15 PUBLICATION PROJ 00 -08 106.95 437.10 fi:? VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 08/04/00 10:39 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50932 08/08/00 152000 STEVE CONVERSE UMPIRE 112.00 112.00 50933 08/08/00 170230 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER WATER SOUTH OFFICE 10.17 10.17 50934 08/08/00 180390 DADCO FOOD PRODUCTS MDSE. FOR RESALE 321.60 MDSE. FOR RESALE 120.60 442.20 50935 08/08/00 180800 DALCO CARPET SPOTTER 14.64 CARPET SPOTTER 11.99 26.63 50936 08/08/00 180985 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO. HELMETS 294.00 294.00 50937 08/08/00 181852 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE REKEY LOCK & 4 KEYS 23.52 23.52 50938 08/08/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 552.00 552.00 50939 08/08/00 200525 DICK BLICK FACE PAINT /BRUSHES /TRAY /CUP 14.71 14.71 50940 08/08/00 210155 DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS MICROFILMING 656.85 656.85 50941 08/08/00 230745 CITY OF EAGAN LUNCH/ADMISSION CASCADE BAY 394.00 394.00 50942 08/08/00 240375 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. REPAIR TO M2 149.07 REPAIR TO M7 181.15 SECONDARY AIR TANK LEAKS 672.46 REPAIR TO R2 132.50 1 50943 08/08/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.40 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 48.16 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 11.30 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 8.50 MATS 23.50 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 21.05 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 68.14 230.24 50944 08/08/00 351610 HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY MPWLD-LARPENTEUR PLANS & SPECS 2 METER STAT WORK FOR MCES 3,696.60 6 50945 08/08/00 401637 RICK JOHNSON DEER REMOVAL 100.00 100.00 50946 08/08/00 450110 L.M.C.I.T. 1ST QTR W/C INS 27,414.00 27,414.00 50947 08/08/00 450140 L.T.G. POWER EQUIPMENT SWITCH PTO /CAPACITOR /LABOR 83.86 83.86 50948 08/08/00 490475 ADAM LUSHANKO UMPIRE 112.00 112.00 50949 08/08/00 501582 MAILE & ENTERPRISES INC 10 WHITE & 10 ORANGE HD MRKRS 442.42 442.42 50950 08/08/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 57.00 BIRTHDAY CAKES 117.50 174.50 19 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 08/04/00 10:39 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50951 08/08/00 530560 MERIT CHEVROLET REPAIR 96 CHEV SUBURBAN 741.49 741.49 50952 08/08/00 540175 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. MDSE. FOR RESALE 250.60 MDSE. FOR RESALE 484.30 734.90 50953 08/08/00 540770 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGERS 253.33 253.33 50954 08/08/00 540890 MINN. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION MAILING LST FEE /DOT TECH MAN 65.00 ANNUAL SIGN MANUAL FEE 5.00 70.00 50955 08/08/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO DEVELOP FILM 3.94 DEVELOP FILM 6.66 10.60 50956 08/08/00 542435 MINNESOTA REC. & PARKS ASSOC. MRPA PROF MAILING LABELS 75.00 75.00 50957 08/08/00 570090 MOGREN BROS. BLACK DIRT 38.34 BLACK DIRT 76.68 BLACK DIRT 79.88 194.90 50958 08/08/00 570260 JESSICA MOREHEAD ADAPTIVE AQUATICS CLASS 60.00 60.00 50959 08/08/00 630664 NATIONAL FIRE & RESCUE RENEW SUBSCRIPTION ACCT 301094 20.00 20.00 50960 08/08/00 640815 NEWPROS DATA, INC. LISTLABS 42.95 42.95 50961 08/08/00 660900 NORTH STAR TURF, INC. 2 RIB PLATE-JAC 83.26 PLATE - JAC 148.28 231.54 50962 08/08/00 661865 JERRY NOVAK PARTS FOR PUMP 42.99 42.99 50963 08/08/00 690340 ARNOLD G OLSON COMM BLDG INSPECTIONS 580.00 580.00 50964 08/08/00 691160 ON SITE SANITATION HARVEST PK 7/21 TO 7/24 275.20 HAZELWOOD PK 7/21 TO 7/24 191.80 467.00 50965 08/08/00 740800 RADIO SHACK BATTERIES /TV CABLE 27.98 BATTERIES /TV CABLE 22.90 50.88 50966 08/08/00 742110 REGIONS HOSPITAL DRUGS & SUPPLIES 418.74 418.74 50967 08/08/00 742210 RAMSEY-WASHINGTON CABLE COMM MINI T -CABLE FOR VIDEO ROOM 9.60 9.60 50968 08/08/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. MOBILE WORKSTATEION SIR - CUB -AO 145.79 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 65.04 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 166.82 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 160.05 537.70 50969 08/08/00 780350 S.E.H. PROJ 98 -09 ENGINEERING 291.86 291.86 50970 08/08/00 780600 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT SNACKS 85.92 SNACKS 82.94 20 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 08/04/00 10 :39 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT PRETZELS 29.95 CAMP SUPPLIES 85.32 TAPE, CD & MUSIC 31.17 2 VHF RADIOS 319.48 1 VHF RADIO 159.74 BUNS /HOT DOGS 39.03 BUNS /HOT DOGS 37.95 2-WAY RADIOS 263.58 2 -WAY RADIOS 215.64 MDSE. FOR RESALE 340.92 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 150.48 VEHICLE SUPPLIES 27.65 SNACKS 225.20 VHF RADIOS 319.48 MDSE. FOR RESALE 19.17 2,433.62 50971 08/08/00 820460 JACLEE SLABA 5 MSNC 250.00 250.00 50972 08/08/00 830240 SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEMS 48' LATHES 50 /BDL 140.37 STAKES 129.59 269.96 50973 08/08/00 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF CRIME LAB SERVICES 100.00 100.00 50974 08/08/00 842800 STATE SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 30.33 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 24.83 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 228.35 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 186.84 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 352.19 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 288.14 DRAIN COVERS 90.49 DRAIN COVERS 74.02 1 50975 08/08/00 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA ACCTS REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 8.01 JOY PARK CLEANUP /NEIGHBORHOOD 37.76 RING BINDERS /BATTERS /POWER STP 164.28 CAMP SUPPLIES 81.74 291.79 50976 08/08/00 861669 THE MOBILE PHONE COMPANY CELL PHONE INSTALL 364.44 364.44 50977 08/08/00 871175 TOM'S MOBIL SERVICE SERVICE ON DC 3 CAR 28.11 28.11 50978 08/08/00 880417 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION FIRE CLAIM 803.75 803.75 50979 08/08/00 880501 TREADWAY GRAPHICS BASKETBALLS /FOOTBALLS /FLASHLGT 472.59 BALLS /DAREN /TAGS /PENS /BOOK MRK 494.16 PROUD PARENT /PINS /SHIRTS 352.63 DARENS /MEDALLIONS /TENT /STICKER 485.64 DARE TEE SHIRTS 1,962.45 NAVY POLO SHIRTS 145.00 3,912.47 50980 08/08/00 910500 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL PUBLIC WORKS 336.92 21 VOUCHRE2 08/04/00 10 :39 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 50981 08/08/00 934170 THE WATSON CO INC 50982 08/08/00 940501 WEBER ELECTRIC CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 ITEM DESCRIPTION CITY HALL MCC MDSE. FOR RESALE MDSE. FOR RESALE MDSE. FOR RESALE MDSE. FOR RESALE MDSE. FOR RESALE ELEC WORK AT STAT 4 TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AMOUNT 242.35 563.68 319.34 100.80 73.80- 382.18 181.58 351.64 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 1,142.95 910.10 351.64 137,448.64 22 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Pa ee 07/31/00 08/01/00 07/31/00 08/01/00 07/28/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/02/00 08/01/00 08/02/00 07/28/00 08/02/00 08/02/00 08/03/00 08/02/00 08/03/00 08/03/00 08/04/00 08/03/00 08/04/00 08/04/00 08/07/00 08/04/00 08/07/00 08/04/00 08/07/00 MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer CBSA Firstar Bank MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer Elan Financial Servii MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer U.S. Treasurer TOTAL Description Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 Dental claims Debt service Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 ;es Purchasing card items Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 Federal Payroll Tax Amount 523.50 22, 798.76 1,369.00 401, 372.50 609.00 19,927.49 5,270.31 631.25 16,004.75 562.50 18,762.50 900.50 11, 307.83 76,227.08 576,266.97 23 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD . CHECK NUMBER ------ - - - -- CHECK DATE ----- - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ - -- AMOUNT - - DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 - - - ALLENSPACH, SHERRY -------- - - - -- 3 3 9.2 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 ALDRIDGE , MARK 19 8.0.9 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 BOHL JOHN C 22 5 9.6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 FLOR,TIMOTHY 2250956 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 FRASER,JOHN 2396932 DIRECT 07/21/00 TAYLOR, KATHERINE 16.90 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT ; 07/21/00 TAUBMAN,DOUGLAS J 2121.80 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 PALMA,STEVEN 2134.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 JOHNSON , KEVIN 2 0 4 8.2 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA A 2002974 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 CROTTY , KERRY 2 2 2 5.68 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 ANDREWS SCOTT A 215 7.2 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 HASSENSTAB DENISE R • 8 1.20 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 HI EBERT STEVEN 2 4 5 2.7 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DUNN,ALICE 2328.19 DIRECT DEPOSIT z 07/21/00 CORNER,AMY L 194.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT j 07/21/00 MOREHEAD,JESSICA R 38.05 DIRECT DEPOSIT ; I 07/21/00 CHRI STENSEN , CHARLES M 18 3 0.6 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 BELDE , STANLEY 2 4 7 9.0 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 RENSLOW , RITA 2 5 4.2 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 BAKKE,LONN A 1894.43 07/21/00 / 1 /00 BOWMAN,RICK A 2082.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 KOPPEN,MARVIN 339.27 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 PIKE,GARY K 2110.79 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 HEINZ , STEPHEN J 2 0 3 8.3 5 24 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 0 7 / 21 / 0 0 HEMQUI ST ,MICHAEL R 18 3 3.3 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 HERBERT ,MICHAEL J 2 0 2 6.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 STOCKTON , DERRELL T 2 0 2 6.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 ROSSMAN,DAVID A 2.499.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07./21/00 HALWEG,KEVIN R 2825.21 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 JUNGSTEPHANIE J 1523.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 MARUSKA ,ERICA 80010 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 OLSON,JULIE S 1523.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT ; DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 BREHEIM,ROGER W 1775902 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 LARSON,DANIEL J 1895.30 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 THI ENES , PAUL 212 2.9 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 CALLAHAN,COLLEEN J I 1745923 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 CARLSON , THERESE 17 5 4.3 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 LE , SHERYL 3141o92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 FAUST DANIEL F 3 4 0 3.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 BAUMAN , GAYLE L 2 3 0 5.8 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 KELSEY ,CONNIE L 855.03 DIRECT DEPOSIT t DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 GUI LFO I LE , KAREN E DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 POWELL, PHILIP 1698.26 . l DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 WINGER, DONALD S 3 3 2 2.3 7 DIRECT DEP O SIT 07/21/00 BAN I CK , JOHN J 2 614.5 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT � 07/21/00 Ii;AR S I ,FLINT D 8 3 8. 22 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT j 07/21/00 KVAM,DAVID 2394.04 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 RABBETT , KEVIN 219 7.6 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 STEFFEN,SCOTT L 2294.78 25 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT. DEPOSIT ? 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/.21/00 l DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT f 07/21/00 r DIRECT DEPOSIT ' 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT j DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 EMPLOYEE NAME THOMALLA, DAVID J BERGERON,JOSEPH A GERVAIS- JR,CLARENCE N LUKIN,STEVEN J HAIDER,KENNETH G PRIEFER,WILLIAM KANE,MICHAEL R LUNDSTEN,LANCE CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M ANDERSON,BRUCE MARUSKA,MARK A HUTCHINSON,ANN E COLEMAN,MELINDA GRAF,MICHAEL ROBBINS,AUDRA L ATKINS,KATHERINE CROSSON, LINDA EASTMAN,THOMAS E STAPLES,PAULINE SCHLINGMAN,PAUL HURLEY,STEPHEN SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J WENZEL,JAY B DOBLAR,RICHARD N COLLINS,KENNETH V AMOUNT --------- - - - - -- 2614.55 2417.62 1980.89 2579.94 415 3.12 1932.83 2328.55 2374.77 2465.83 3059.51 2168.83 1780.03 307 9.13 1211.23 1272.83 1149.63 1691.23 2130.86 2400.31 1826.43 2247.05 2463.17 1495.87 2845.53 339.27 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 CAMPBELL, CRAIG D 18 21.14 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DOLLERSCHELL ROBERT J 2 4 3.9 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 ERI CKSON KYLE F 6 9 4.7 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 WEAVER, KRISTINE A 922988 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 HAWKINS,LISA A 60.05 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 KOEHNEN,AMY 18.25 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 McGUIRE,MICHAEL A 4180.37 DIRECT DEPOSIT. 07/21/00 TRONN E S, JOHN E 12 4 4.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 OSTER, ANDREA J 1508.03 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT i 3 07/21/00 URBANSKI , HOLLY S 12 9 8.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 ANDERSON , CAROLE J 955.58 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 JACKSON , MARY L 1485963 DIRECT DEPOSIT i 07/21/00 TETZLAFF, JUDY A 13 4 0.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 CASAREZ GINA - 13 2 8.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 ICKES, SHERI 182.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 CABLE, JEANETTE E 14 4 6.08 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 JAGOE,CAROL .1439.72 .DIRECT DEPOSIT � DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 OLSON,SANDRA 1179.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 CORCORAN , THERESA M 13 5 6.14 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 MARTINSON, CAROL F 1775.18 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 EVERSON , PAUL 14 8 0.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT ' 07/21/00 PARSONS,KURT G .0 1503 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 SPANGLER,EDNA E 409.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT y 4 07/21/00 ZWIEG,SUSAN C. 1480903 DIRECT DEPOSIT Olt DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DeBILZAN,THOMAS C 1416.73 27 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT- .07/21/00 EDGE , DOUGLAS 18 8 3.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 LUTZ, DAVID P 1973.27 DIREST DEPOSIT 07/21/00 MEYER GERALD W 1848978 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/2.1/00 NAGEL,BRYAN 1993.46 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 OSWALD,ERICK D 1567.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 THOMAS -JR , STEVEN 1532.03 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DUCHARME , JOHN 19 4 0.7 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 PECK, DENNIS L 2014.7.9 i DIRECT DEPOSIT 1 07/21/00 PRIEBE,WILLIAM 2187.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 DOHERTY , KATHLEEN M 6 6 0.9 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT f 07/21/00 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 15 61.6 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 GREW- HAYMAN JANET M 7 6 3.3 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 HORSNELL JUDITH A 12 3 8.5 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT S 07/21/00 NELSON,JEAN 880969 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 GAYNOR,VIRGINIA A 1458.57 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 FRY,PATRICIA 1480.03 DIRECT DEPOSIT k' DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 LIVINGSTON,JOYCE L 786.29 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 THOMPSON, DEBRA J 524924 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 EKSTRAND , THOMAS G 2 0 7 8.5 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT :✓ 07/21/00 ROBERTS , KENNETH 2 0 2 2.9 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 CARVER, NI CHOLAS N 1961963 DIRECT DEPOSIT , 07/21/00 KELLY,LISA 971.88 DIRECT DEPOSIT 0 7/ 21/00 NORDQUI ST , RI CKARD 16 5 7.7 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT ' DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 OTIS,MARY ELLEN M 784.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 CHRISTENSEN, JODIE D 683.62 28 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 COLEMAN , PHI LI P DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 FARR, DIANE M DIRECT DEPOSIT '07/21/00 HORWATH , RONALD J DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 JO HNSON,MEGAN M DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 LABSON,DEBRA DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 MOORE, VANESSA J DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 SAVAGEAU,STEPHEN D DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT i 07/21/00 SEEGER, GERALD F DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 STEINHORST , JEFFREY DIRECT DEPOSIT I 07/21/00 SWANSON , LYLE DIRECT DEPOSIT ` 07/21/00 COSTELLO , SHARON L DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 SCHMIDT JASON E DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 FLUG,MEGAN L DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 SVENDSEN,RUSTIN L DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/21/00 PRIEFER,BRIAN W 79259 07/21/00 CARDINAL,ROBERT J. 79260 07/21/00 WASILUK, JULIE A 79261 07/21/00 ZICK,LINDA 79262 07/21/00 ENGSTROM,MICHAEL P 79263 07/21/00 INGVOLDSTAD,CURTIS J 79264 07/21/00 CUDE,LARRY J 79265 07/21/00 EDSON,KAREN L 79266 07/21/00 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 79267 07/21/00 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 79268 07/21/00 JOHNSON,BONNIE AMOUNT 253.51 343.77 545.94 279.46 253.56 636.76 1444.42 412.56 553.55 1484.76 274.19 1470.83 172.50 2060.00 690.00 385.50 339.27 207.00 50.00 75.00 391.71 587.50 561.25 1630.70 773.52 29 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNING REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 7912-169 07/21/0-0 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1641*02 7927-0 0-7/21/00 PALANK KAY 1775o18 79271 0.7/21/00 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1496993 792-72 07/21/00 RYAN,MICHAEL 2,935009 7-5-273 07/21[00 SVENDSEN M 1536e0 3 79274 .0-7/21/00 BARTZ PAUL 2105*48 79275 0-7/21/00 BUSACK,DANIEL P 1459036 79276 07/21/00 KONG T 1290.04 7-9-277 07/21/070 WATCZAK 193:6o83 79:278 07/21/0-0 WELCHLIN , CABOT V 20:46.01 79279 07/21/00 MEEHAN 2122e35 79280 07/21/00 MORNING,TIMOTHY L 14-62971 79.281 07/21/00 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 2616.92 7*92 82 07/21/00 ACOSTA, MARK J 9D0.0 00 79283 07./21/0110 AFXBORN H 912o0-0 79,284 07/21/0:0 ANDERSON I BOBB1 E J 747.00 79285 0:7/21 /0:0 ANDERSON BRIAN 520.00 75286 07/21/0.0 ANDERSON A 376.00 792,007 07/21/00 A .JR, LAIRD 324o00 7-9:1288 07/.21/00 AU-BIN.,DENNIS J 1200.00 79.218,9 07121/0-0 BA-HL,,:DAVID C 1539*00 792.9.-0 07/21/00 BALAZS, JOSEPH M 456901.0 792-91 07/21/00 BAUMAN,ANDREW C 2307o0-0 7929%2 07/21./00 BECK L 952o00 7 9 2 9 3 07 / 21./ 00 BOE,ERICK W 6.8 4.0 0 31 CITT OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79294 07/21/00 BOLLES,THOMAS A 1782.00 79295 07/21/00 BOURQUIN,RON -G 790.00 7.92%6 07/21/00 BRAATEN,HAROLD A 814.00 79297 07/21/00 BUCHE JOETTE 1752.00 79 07/21/0:0 CAHILL, CHRISTOPHER S 9 3 0.0 0 79299 07/21/00 CROMETT,MARK F 1486.00 79300 07/21/00 DALY,FRANK 1596.00 79301 07/21/00 DAWSON,RICHARD P 8.88000 79302 07/21/0-:0 DIETZ, EDWARD W 1092.00 79 0,7/21/0-0 DITTEL, MICHAEL A 15100 00 79304 07/21/0:0 DOREE, KURT A 1516.00 79305 07/21/00 DUELLMANAMY L 756.00 719306 07/21/0.0 DUELLMAN, JOSEPH W 49200 ;0 791 07 07/21/0,0 DUELLMAN ,KIRK T 10 5 0.0 0 7930,8 07/21/00 DeMARS,TIMOTHY A 471.0.0 793:09 07/21/00 EVERSON,PAUL E 324.00 79310 07/21/00 FASULO,WALTER R 85:2.0.0 79311 07/21/00 FETTERS,JEFFREY L 1930.00 7 07/21/00 FITZGERALD,EDWARD P 588.00 7:9313 07/21/010 GERARD ,JAMIE P 2280e0--0 79314 07/21/00 GER`IAIS -JR,. CLARENCE N 1212.00 79 315 07/21/0.0 GRILL , CARL 828. GO 7931 -6 07/21/00 GROSCHEN, JOSEPH D 48.00 793,17 0 7/ 21 / 0 0HAKS ETH , NATHAN I 8 7 2.0 0 79318 07/21/00 HALE,JOSEPH E 255.00 31 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79319 07/21/00 HALE M 1910*66 7932.0 07/21/00 HALWEG I KEVIN R 371.33 79.321 07/21/00 HAMLIN,ANDREW G 785.00 79322 07/21/00 HASKINS,KEVIN J 1475*00 79323 07/21/0.0 HEFFERNAN,PATRICK E 23999.00 79,324 07/21/0-0 HERLUND,RICK R 1294000 793251 07/21/.00 HJELLE,ER:IK DAVID 415*00 79326 07/21/00 HOHNI JAMES M 2232.00 79327 07/21/GO JOHN SON I ANDREA D 264o00 79-328 07/21/010 JOHNSON,DOUGLAS R 1354*0%0 7:9,329 07/21/0-0 KARNOWSKI J 1256*0:0 79330 0 07/21/00 KNABE H 1050.600 79331 07/21/00 KOEHN,,CORY M 2291.00 711,93-32 07/21/0'o KOLASA, MARK A 864000 7,9333 07/21/0.0 KONDER W 3 3 6 3. 00 79334 07/21/00 KORTUS,,.WILLIAM J 730966 79, 0 7 / 2-l./ GO LIALLIER,TED C 736000 7,533-:6 07/21/G0 LACKNER,GREGORY J 132o0 ,0 791337 07/21/00 LEDMAN, KEVIN 1642*0-0 7933.8 07/21/00 LIDBERG., MICHAEL A 934o00 79339 07/21/00 LINN D 528.00 79340 07/21/00 LOVE,NICOLE J 304*00 79:341 07, /21/00 LUCERO ROGER E 6:63.00 79342 07/21/00 MALLORY E 1282*65 79343 07/21/00 MARTY K 2532*00 32 CITY OF MAPLEWO EMPL GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 79344 0-7/21/00 MARX ,ERIC D 719,345 07/21/0,0 MELANDER,JON A 793246 07/21/00 MELANDER A 7193,47 07/21/00 MELLEN T 119348 07/21/00 MEYERS E ' 79349 07/21/00 MILLER,NICHOLAS J 793-5-0 07/21/00 MONK,JOHN J 79.351 07/21/00 MONROY,JON J 7935:2 07/21/010 McGOVERN,JOHN L 79353 07/21/00 NADEAU R 791-354 07/21/00 NALIPINSKI,STEPHEN M 7 .935.5 07/21/00 NEU-VAN,BRIAN A 79-3-56 07/21/0,0 NOLAN W 7-91357 07/21/010 NOVAK R 793518 07/21/00 OLSON A 7-9-3-59 07/2]./0: PETERSON,MARK S 7 93-60 07/21/0-0 PETERSON A 719361 07/21/0.0 PETERSON,ROBERT H 791.62 07/21/0.0 PETE R SONTHEODORE E 79363 07/21/00 PIZRCE G 79364 07/21/0.0 PILLAR, MICHAEL R 79-3-65 07/21/0,0 POOLE C 7936.6 07/21/00 RICKETSON L 79367 07/21/0,0 ROMANIK A 7 9 3 6-8 017/21/0:0 RONDEAU 0 WILLIAM R AMOUNT mw 4=n 216 0 0:0 2560e0-0 2042 00 712.00 1438900 804.00 76,6000 4017 * 010 114,6900 456.00 1570.00 434.00 564*00 2607.00 7*80 o 00 826.00 60-10 * 0,0 1595.33 12`42.00 2.059 o 0.0 396*00 576 0 OD 10-0900110 260.00 432.00 33 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 7,9169 07/21/0,0 SACKETT I JAMES T 376*0,0 75370 07/21/ SCHAD.T,JEFFREY A 2154*00 19371 07/21/00 SCHGENECKER, THOMAS R 864*00 7 917 2 07/2.1/0,0 SCHULTZ E 756*00 7:9- 3 7 3 07/21/00 SEVERSONDAVID A 1518.66 79374 07/21/00 SHANLEY J 492o00 79375 07/21/0,0 SIEDOW R 637*00 79376 07/21/00 SIKORA T 598o00 79377 .07/21/00 SINGER,SCOTT W 492o00 79-378 07/21/010 SKOK , STEPHEN L 516..0.:0 79379 07/21/00 SMITH, KEITH A 1218o00 7'9 3 0 07/21/0:0 SMITH ,MICHAEL T 275o33 79381 07/21/0-0 SMITH I RICHARD J 305*0.0 79.3. 8 2% 07/21/00 ST-A-N-WAY ,ROBERT A 276.00 79383 07/21/0.0 SVENDSEN,RON 1404o00 7-931814 07/21/00 SVENDSEN L 132.00 7-9.385 07/21/00 SZULIM , JERRY A 776oOO 7938.6 0.7/21/00 TESSMER,TODD D 323.00 793.97 07/21/00 TREPANIER, EUGENE 1134.00 7924.8 0.7/211"o-0 TRONNES ., JOHN E 300000 7-9389 07/21/00 UBEL., J 332o00 79-19:0 07/21/00 WALZ G 1716oG0 79391 07/21/00 WATERS I JOSEPH D 1879.6 6 79392 07/21/00 WELDON,-ROBERT W. 888o00 7-9393 07/21/00 WHISLER D 13360-00 34 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79.394 07/21/00 WHILE, JOEL A 1011*00 79395 07/21/00 WILSON M 2527e00 7939-6 0:7/21/00 ZASTROW P 2108000 793-97 017/21/0D ZI MM ERMANN HOHN,ANN K 1334*0 0 79.3,9.8 07/21/01:0 CHLEBECK M 15-64.0 3 791199 07/21/01.0 N'IVEN,AMY S 547*25 7940.0 07/21/0D ELIA.S,BENJAMIN G 95-0900 74401 07/21/00 ELIASBRIAN J 950000 79402 07/21100 FREBERG RONALD L 1634.43 7,54:03 07/21/00 JONES fDONALD R 1588968 79404 07/21/00 ELIAS G 1,978*43 7-9.4.05 07/21/00 EMMS.M.ELISSA K 660.*4-0 79-4106 07/21/00 L.INDBLOM.,RANDAL 2009949 79407 07 / 2 1/ 00 EDSON B 159%0*43 79408 07 / 21 /00 REL.EY,ROLAND B 1590*43 79 :4 Atzv 07/21/GO HINNENKAMP,,GARY 1625e77 79 41.0 07/21/G0 LAVAQUE, MICHAEL 153.2*03 79 07/211/00 L.IND.ORFF,DENNIS P 1562o71 79.412 07/2.1/00 LUND:,ERI-C 736.00 7-9-413 0-7 / 21 / oo.0 NAUGHTON,JOHN W 844.0 0 79:414 07/21/Go NOVAKMICHAEL J 10.83o23 79,415 07/21/00 PATTERSON T 828*00 79-41-6 0 7 / 21 / GO POSSERT,RYAN 772.00 7:9417 07/21/00 RODRIGUEZ J 551*00 79418 07 / 21 / GO TAYLOR I JENELLt L 120,00 35 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79419 07/21/0-0 MACY,RITA 48*75 79-4:20 07/21/00 MCCUSKER, ELIZABETH A MANNING 136.0 0 7.9421 07/21/00 SOUTTER,CHRISTINE 2.4*38 79422 07/21/00 WEGWERTH A 15.08*03 79423 07/21/00 ANDERSON,EVERETT 468.95 7.9424 07/21/Go OSTROM 2493963 7 5.42 5 07/ WENGER, ROBERT J 1844e03 794216 07/21[00 BALLESTRAZZE.,THAD M 464933 79427 07/21/00 BRANDSTROM,MARY C 33.75 79428 07/21/00 BUSMAN M 294*00 79429 07/21/0-0 FINN I GREGORY S 1160o83 79.4310 07/21/00 FLUG R 472..50 79431 07/21/00 FORTIER,SARAH S 458o50 794 3 2 07/21/0,0 FRANK ,LAURA 511o50 7`9.433 07/21/00 G,EB.HARD,JILLIAN R 308.75 79434 017[21/010 GLASS DA, NIEL M 228.75 794,35 07/21/"0.:0 HUO TELIZABETH 25o50 79436 07/21/ 0,0 LINT I TERI L 520.00 79437 07/21/0,0 MCBRIDE PATRICK D 35*50 79 4 3-8 07 /21 / 0:0 NELSON ,HEATHER N 471o50 794,19 07/21/00 NIEMCZYK, BRIAN N 90. Go 79-440 07/21/00 NORGAARD. J 231o00 791,441 07/21/00 RUBBELKE A 28,.0-0 79442 07/21/0.0 SCHOEN W 87*50 79.4-43 07/21/00 SHOBERG A 5:4.00 36 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS'REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79:444 07/21/010 SIKORA,.PAUL T 24,00 794-4.5 017/21/0-0 SPAAR,AMY R 153,955 79446 0.7/21/00 UNGAR,KRI.STOPHER 64o50 7'9447 07/21100 WERNER. M 204*00 794148 07/21/0.0 ZIELINSKI R 65o50 791449 07/21/00 GERMAIN 1573*63 79451.0 07/21/,00 NADEAU.,EDWARD A 2328.55 79451 07/21/00 SCHULTZ,SCOTT M 1568o09 7'9452 07/21/00 D SKE, HER A .126o93 791453 07/21/0.0 GLASS, J--,.- 855963 79-454 07/21,/00 HO.IUM 929o29 7-945:5. 07/2 KARAS,TAMARA A 761o71 79-4.56 07/21/0,0 OGREN ALLISON A 81.65 794-57 07/2 -1/00 POWERS,NICOLE L 278*80 79-1458 07/21/00 RIDLEHOOVERKAT-E 1 2 57 o 4 3 7-9459 07/21/010 SALZBRENNER T 181.95 79-460 07/21/00 SCM,4IDT,,RUSSELL 1251.23 79461 07/21/00 v SE ERSON CHRISTINA M 270*54 794,62 07/21/00 SHOBERG CARP J 627.12 7:9,463 07/21/00 SMITHAMY L 142080 79,464 07/21/00 ABRAHAMSON Lo 424.25 79465 07/21/00 ANDERSON,JULIE M 276.64 79466 07/21/00 ANDERSON,TIMOTHY R 206960 79467 07/211/0.0 BACHMAN T 30e88 794,68 07/21/00 BITTNER C 763.76 37 CHECK NUMBER 794-69 79470 79471 79,472 79,473 794,75 79476 79-477 79478 79479 C DATE 07/21/00 07/21/0-0 07j21/00 07/21/0-0 07/21/00 ,07/21/00 07/21/00 07/21/00 0117/21/00 Q7/21/00 07!21/00 79.480 07/21/00 7-9481 07/21/00 79:482 07/21/00 79:483 07/21/00 7914:84 07/21/00 794,85 07/21/00 7,194-86 09/21/00 794817 07/21/00 794818 07/21/00 79489 07/21/00 79,490 07/21/00 7949-1 07/21/0.0 7949 2 07/21/010 7-9493 07/21/0,0 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD EMPLOYEE NAME BODZIAK D CHAPMAN,DAN 0 CHAPMAN.JENNY A CMIEL S DAMROW I KELLY C DEMPSEY M DeGRAW M ENGFER A ERICKS,ON A FLOR,MARY PAT FRETZ,SARAH J FRUCI L GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C HAGGERTY,K.ATHRYN A HAGSTROM S HAWKE A H,.EIM,ANDREA J HEINN,REBECCA L HENLY I SAMUEL E HILLS M HOLMGREN . LEAH M HORNING M HOULE DENT SE L HUPPERT , ERIN M IKHAML,JOHN AMOUNT 61.75 165.00 400*82 14o85 105*40 100.75 698*44 199*50 20: 9 2 0 11. 63 393 88 91*00 79*40 129*75 80.00 408.35 96.50 557.80 140.63 263.25 651.83 40950 116.10 659.97 37*20 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE 79.494 07/21/00 794.95 07/21/00 79496 07/21/00 79497 7949-8 79499 7950.0 79.501 79-502 79-5 79504 79.5'.05 79506 79507 79508 79509 7-9.5,10 79511 79512 719513 7-951.4 795:15 79.5,16 79517 79.518 EMPLOYEE NAME IRISH D JOHNSON ,ROBERT P JOHNSON,ROLLAND H JOHNSON M KAHLER , BRADLEY G KERSCHNER,BRANDON R KERSCHNER,JOLENE M KOEHNEN,MARY B MEISEL,,TAMBREY MEVERDEN,LAURA J MO.SSONG,ANDREA M MOTZ,ERIN M OIREAGAN, CHRISTINE OLSON,ABIGAIL E OWEN,JONATHAN PEHOSKI,JOEL T SCHAEFER,ROB J SEXTON LANI SHERRILIL,,.MASON D SIMONSON M SMITLEY L STEINKE P SWANER THELL TIBODEAU. J AMOUNT 81925 396:9 0-5 176*83 16.00 91000 118.63 377.34 675.77 94933 70*41 175*50 320*97 19.25 120925 26-.0*94 320 70 204*75 is 0 00 691.60 559e12 119*40 509.57 258-930 72*00 296.88 07/21/00 07/21/0.0 07/21/0-0 07/21/00 07/21/00 07/21/00 07/21/00 07/21/00 07 / 2 1/ 0.0 07/21/00 07/21/0-0 07/21/0D 07/21/00 07/21/,00 07/21/`00 07/21/GIO 07/21/0D 07/21 0.7 /2 1 / 0:0 07/21/00 07/21/00 D7/21/00 39 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79,519 07/21/00 now WARNER 59.70 79.520 07/21/0-0 WEDES H 117 GO 7,952-1 07/21/01,10 WELTER I ELIZABETH M 117990 7.9522 07/21/00 W-HITEINICOILE B 68.25 791523 07/21/00 WHITE M 105*23 79524 07./21/00 WHITING A 229o00 7-95215 07/21/00 WILLIAMS,KELLY M 1005.95 7952-6 07/2.1/0,0 WOODMAN ALICE E 386o13 79-5 07/21/0,0 WORWA M 199.78 79,528 07,/21/GO ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L 451. 11 7,91.5-2:9 07/21/00 BERGUM,TANIA S 6*25 795310 0,7/21/01:0 BOSLEY 186.55 79531 0117/21/0.0 FLEMING,KATH Y A 280*31 7,9532 07/21/0,0 FLEMING, LAURA C 90.00 79:15,33 07/21/00 GL SSG:ILLIAN - A 62o90 7.95-34 07/21/00 GROPPO LILINDA M 73*5.0 72953.5 07/21/0,0 HANSEN K 2 6 8.0 0 79536 07/21/00 HANSENEMILY J 42.00 795,37 07/21/00 HORNING M 36900 19-538 07/21100 HUPPERT L 60.0:0 7:953 9 07/21/00 SCHROEDER KATHLEEN 159*78 79540 07/21/00 SHERRILL A 190009 79541 07/21/00 ANTON E 3105921 79542 07/21/00 BEHAN,JAMES 1304903 79543 07/21/00 BESTLAND. R 132.00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79-544 07/21/00 BOTTOLFSON Re 18.00 7954'5 07/21100 CHAPEAU,GREG M 605*67 79 54.6 07./21/00 DOUGLASS,TOM 13.8*0.0 79547 0-7/21/00 GRENDZINSKI. J 126.00 7*9548 07/21/00 HEMPFER, NICHOLAS W 5, *40 79549 07/21/010 JAHN.,DAVID J 1328983 79550 07/21/ 0,.0 KOSKI F 795:5.1 07/21/00 KYRK 96*00 79552 07/21/00 KYRK,BREANNA K 6.68 79553 07/21/0-0 LONETTI F 663918 79554 .07/21/0c0 MATTESON , FRANK M 191.78 7:9 5— -5 5 07/21/00 MORIN,TROY J 158e0 ,0 79.515-6 07/21/0,0 PATTERSON,ALBERT 686*58 79557 07/21/00 PRINS M 267.79 791558 07/21/00 REILLY R 873o7-8 75155.9 07/21/0Q SEVERSON A 540-00 7915,60 07/21/0.0 YOUNG J 370.50 79.5-6.1 07/21/0,0 AICHELEI,CRAIG J 1388*83 7`95 62 —2 :07/21/00 MULVANEY M 1727*23 79.503 07/21/00 PRIEM, STEVEN A. 1572.99 455856991 41 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 ATKINS , KATHERINE 64 3.9 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 ALLENSPACH, SHERRY 3 3 9.2 7 DIRECT.DEPOSIT 08/04/00 ALDRIDGE,MARK 2318.96 DIRECT DEPOSIT , 08/04/00 BOHL,JOHN C 2115.75 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 FLOR,TIMOTHY 2029963 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 FRASER,JOHN 2431916 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 TAUBMAN,DOUGLAS J 2121.80 ,DIRECT DEPOSIT i DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 PALMA,STEVEN 2243.41 DIRECT DEPOSIT } 08/04/00 JOHNSON KEVIN 2029.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT n 08/04/00 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA A 2144.07 i; DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 CROTTY , KERRY 2 3 8 4.17 DIRECT DEPOSIT Y 08/04/00 ANDREWS , SCOTT A 2072992 ti DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 HASSENSTAB, DENISE R 39.6O Y DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 HIEBERT, STEVEN 2434995 .,r DIRECT DEPOSIT � 08/ 04/00 DUNN • ALICE 213 8.6 0 4. DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 CORNER,AMY L 58920 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 BELDE,STANLEY 2185.89 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT. 08/04/00 RENSLOW,RITA 176.30 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 BAKKE , LONN A 18 9 4.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 BOWMAN ,RICK A 2 0 2 6.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 KOPPEN, MARVIN 3 3 9.2 7 ! 3 1 .DIRECT DEPOSIT ' 08/04/00 ' PIKE_ -GARY K • 708 1 .83 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 HEINZ,STEPHEN J 2026.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 HERBERT,MICHAEL J 2045.06 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 STOCKTON,DERRELL T 2026.43 42 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK'NUMBER -- �.--- - - - - -- CHECK DATE ---- - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 - - - - -- ROSSMAN, DAVID A --------------- 22 03.54 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 HALWEG ,KEVIN R 2 6 5 4.5 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 MARUSKA ERICA , 8001 DEPOSIT .DIRECT 08/04/00 OLSON,JULIE S 1523.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 BREHEIM, ROGER W 2149.03 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 LARSON,DANIEL J 1676.27 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 THIENES, PAUL 2060.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 CALLAHAN , COLLEEN J 1870923 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 CARLSON , THERES E 17 5 4.3 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 LE , SHERYL 3 2 6 6.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 FAUST DANIEL F I 3528.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT = 08/04/00 BAUMAN,GAYLE L 2305.89 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 KELSEY,CONNIE L 801.16 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 GUILFOILE,KAREN E 2129.79 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 POWELL,PHILIP 1698.26 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 WINGER,DONALD S 3322.37 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 BANICK,JOHN J 2614.55 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 KAKIS , FLINT D 2 2 8 8.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 KVAM, DAVID 2 3 4 3.02 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 RABBETT, KEVIN 2 3 2 5.52 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 STEFFEN SCOTT L � 2351.28 DIRECT DEPOSIT { d 08/04/00 THOMALLA,DAVID J 2614.55 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 BERGERON,JOSEPH A 2756.56 DIRECT DEPOSIT ; i 08/04/00 GERVAIS— JR,CLARENCE N 1980089 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 LUKIN, STEVEN J 2579994 43 r ,1 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 RAIDER, KENNETH G 43 2 8.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 PRI EFER WILLIAM 19 3 2.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 KANE,MICHAEL R 2168.83 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 LUNDSTEN,LANCE 2374.77 DIRECT DEPOSIT j 08/04/00 CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M 2465.83 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 ANDERSON,BRUCE 3234.51 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 MARUSKA, MARK A 2 4 0 8.41 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 HUTCHINSON, ANN E 1780.03. DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 COLEMAN , MELINDA 3 2 5 4.13 DIRECT DEPOSIT t 5 08/04/00 GRAF ,MICHAEL 1211o23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 ROBBINS,AUDRA L 1272.83 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 CROSSON LIND , A 1691.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 EASTMAN,THOMAS E 2130.86 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 STAPLES,PAULINE 2400.31 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 SCHLINGMAN,PAUL 1826.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 HURLEY, STEPHEN 2247.05 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 2263953 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 WENZEL,JAY B 1337.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 DOBLAR, RICHARD N 14 2 2.8 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT ti p ? 5 08/04/00 COLLINS KENNETH V 3 3 9.2 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT _h r. 08 / 04 00 / CAMPBELL CRAIG D , 1337.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 4. [ 08/04/00 DOLLERSCHELL J 243.93 DIRECT DEPOSIT 1 jgN 4s 08/04/00 ERICKSON,KYLE F 676.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT : r DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 WEAVER,KRISTINE A 895.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 HAWKINS , LISA A 120010 r ,1 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE.CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 KOEHNEN , AMY 3 6.5 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 55 08/04/00 MCGUI RE ,MICHAEL A 418 0.3 7 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT r 08/04/00 TRONNES JOHN E � .1244.83 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 OSTER J 1508:03 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 URBANSKI,HOLLY S 1298.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 ANDERSON,CAROLE J 1059.14 .DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 JACKSON,MARY L 1485.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 TET Z LAFF , JUDY A 13 4 0.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 CASAREZ 1328.83 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 CABLE , JEANETTE E 14 01.5 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 JAGOE , CAROL DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 OLSON SANDRA ► 1145.53 DIRECT DEPOSIT 0 8/04/00 CORCORAN THE , RESA M 1343.14 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 MARTINSON,CAROL F 1751.18 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 EVERSON,PAUL 1594.84 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 PARSONS,KURT G 1469.60 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 SPANGLER,EDNA E 596.52 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 ZWI EG , SUSAN C . 14 8 0.0 3 h i DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 DeBILZAN, THOMAS C 1199o23 DIRECT DEPOSIT `ti rt , 08/04/00 EDGE , DOUGLAS 2 9 2 3.5 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 LUTZ,DAVID P 2874.70 DIRECT DEPOSIT y ` 08/04/00 MEYER,GERALD W 1619.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 NAGEL,BRYAN 2933.02 DIRECT DEPOSIT =k _. DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 OSWALD,ERICK D 1847.08 DIRECT DEPOSIT J 08/04/00 THOMAS —JR , STEVEN 15 8 8.01 45 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK'NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 DUCHARME , JOHN 18 7 2.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 PECK DENNI S L 2 0.2 3.8 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 PRIEBE,WILLIAM 1907.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M 763.20 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES 1561.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 GREW- HAYMAN,JANET M 1114.60 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 HORSNELL, JUDITH A 84 6.02 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 NELSON , JEAN 8 7 2.21 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 GAYNOR,VIRGINIA A 1423.15 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 FRY , PATRICIA 14 8 0.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 LIVINGSTON JOYCE L 8 4 5.14 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 THOMPSON,DEBRA J 480.65 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 EKSTRAND,THOMAS G 1987.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 ROBERTS,KENNETH 1951.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1961.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 KELLY,LISA 1052958 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 NORDQUI ST , RI CHARD 2052o,97 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 OT I S, MARY ELLEN M 713980 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 CHRISTENSEN, JODIE D 842.98 DIRECT-DEPOSIT 08/04/00 COLEMAN, PHILIP 98.42 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 FARR,DIANE M 347.64 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 HORWATH,RONALD J 441.13 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 JOHNSON,MEGAN M 414951 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 LARSON , DEBRA 279946 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 MOORE , VANES SA J 6 8 7.9 8 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK ------ - - - - -- CHECK DATE ---- . - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 - - - - -- SAVAGEAU, STEPHEN D --------------- 13 9 3.6 3 DIT<EC T DEPOSIT � 08/04/00 SEEGER, GERALD F 400951 i DIRECT DEPOSIT ! 08/04/00 STEINHORST r JEFFREY 4 9 2.71 DIRECT DEPOSIT I 08/04/00 SWANSON,LYLE 1575.37 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 COSTELLO, SHARON L 297.34 08/04/00 SCHMIDT,JASON E 1470. - 83 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 FLUG,MEGAN L 205.38 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 : SVENDSEN, RUSTIN L 2 060.00 { DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/04/00 PRIEFER,BRIAN W 2 7 0.0 0 79572 08/04/00 RYAN,MICHAEL 2935.09 79575 08/04/00 CARDINAL,ROBERT J. 385.50 79576 08/04/00 WASILUK,JULIE A 339.27 79577 08/04/00 CUDE,LARRY J 391.71 79578 08/04/00 EDSON,KAREN L 514907 79579 08/04/00 HOIUM,DORA 680.00 79580 08/04/00 KOHNER,JANEEN C 168.00 79581 08/04/00 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 755971 79582 08/04/00 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 1630.70 79583 08/04/00 JOHNSON,BONNIE 827.53 79584 08/04/00 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1498.55 79585 08/04/00 PALANK,MARY KAY 1751.18 79586 08/04/00 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1700.33 79587 08/04/00 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1564.10 79588 08/04/00 BARTZ,PAUL 2034.32 79589 08/04/00 BUSACK,DANIEL P 1416.51 r. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79590 08 - /04/00 JUNGSTEPHANIE J I 152.3*23 795-91 08/,04/00 KONGTOMMY T 1295*47 795,92 OB/04/00 WATCZAK 1936983 79 59 3 0-8 / 04 / 0.0 WELCHL I N, CABOT' V 2023o99 79594 08/04/00 MEEHAN,JAMES 2424o21 755.9.5. 08/04/00 MORNING L 1189.9.1 7-95,96 0.8/04/00 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 2531*45 7 9, .59-7 - 0,8/04/00 CHLEBECK, JUDY M 1564.03 79598 08/ 04./ GO NIVEN S 53 6.02 79599 08/04/00 DARST M 2373.75 79-6,00 .08/04/00 ELIAS G 1490.00 79-6.01 08/04/00 ELIAS BRI AN J 14900-00 7916,02 0-8,/ 04 00 FR,EB ERG f RONALD L 159,,8*43 79603 08/04./00 JONES DONALD R 2022.59 79-604 08/04/00 ELIAS JAMES G 1978.43 79:611-05 08/04/00 EMMS MELT S:SA K 717960 79.606 08/04/00 LINDBLOM.,RANDAL 2301*59 7:96,07 08/04/00 EDSONDAVID B 1594*75 719:160,18 081/04/00 HELEY I ROLAND B 159,0*43 796,0 9 08/0-4/00 HINNENKAMP,GARY 1543991 79 610 08/04/00 LAVAQUE 1532*03 796.11 08/04/00 LINDORFF P 1571.63 79612 08 0 4 0:0 ------ -- --- 733*510 791613 08 0:4 [0 0 NAUGHTON,JOHN W 1178975 79.614 08/0-4/00 NOVAK J 1242*73 48 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 796-15 08/04/00: PATTERSON T 92000:0 79.616 08/04/00 POSSERT,RYAN 1044.75 796:117 08/04/00 RODRIGUEZ J 427*50 7.9.6 08/04/00 TAYLOR, JENELLE L 160*00 796.1-9 08 -04 00 MCCUSKER,.ELIZABETH A MANNING 229*50 796.210 08.104/00 SOUTTER 75.56 719641 08/04/00 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1508e03 79,6122 08/04 ANDERSON,,EVERETT 569*80 791423 0-8/04/00 OSTROM 2493*63 79624 08/04/0-0 WENGER,ROBERT J 1844*03 79625 0-8/04/00 BALLESTRAZZE,THAD M 660.00 7` ,6 2 6 081 / 04/ 010 B ,CHRISTINA M 58 5.9 e9-0 796:27 0:8/04/00 FINN,GREGORY S 1360*83 7962 80 08/04/00 FLUG.,ELAINE R . v ELAINE 596*63 79-:629 08/04/00 FORTIER, SARAH S 236*25 79,610 0:811/ 04 / 0,0 FRANK , LAURA 651*75 79,631 08/04/00 GEBHARD,JILLIAN R 253*75 791632 08/0.4/00 GLASS, DANIEL M 30.75 7916.33 .0"8/01.4 -00 KRUNMEL., JOSEPH C 248e50 796-34 OS/04/010 LINN L 502.00 791635 0.181/04/00 McBRIDE,PATRICK D 35*50 79-636 08/04/00 NELSON N 243o00 7.9-.63,7 08/04/00 NIEMCZYK. BRIAN N 41*25 79-618 08/04/00 NORGAARD J 462e60 79639 08/0-4/00 RUBBELKE,SARA A 26*00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NVMBER CHECK - DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 796410 0,8/04/0.0 SPAAR. I AMY R 340.m00 79 641 08/04/00 UNGAR, KRI STOPHER 51.0 0 79.642 08/04/00 WERNER, KATIE M 345900 79643 08/04/00. GERMAIN,DAVID 20-91*49 79-4644 08./0-4/00 NAD EAU ,EDWARD A 2168o83 75:645 08/04/00 SCHULTZ I SCOTT M 1848o71 7964-6 08/04/00 DlSKERUD,HEATHER A 149o10 79647 08/04/00 GLASS,JEAN 849.63 7944.8 08/04/00 HO.IUM 950.16 7-9649 08/04/00 KARAS A 717*06 79650 0 / 04 / 00 OQR-EN I ALLISON A 155o00 79651 08,/0*/0,0, PlOWERS L 244o80 79660-2 0,8/04/00 RIDLEHOOVER , KATE 1 258 o 10 p, 79.6513 08/04/00 SALZBRENNER,HEIDI T 425.20 79.611-54 08/04/0-0 SC11MIDT,RUSSELL 125.1o23 79655 0,8./04/0.0 SEVERSON M 277.92 791:6510 '08/04/00 S -HOBERG CARY J 1 . 615o11 7%657 ;08:/ 04 / 00 SMITH, AMYL 387o6O 7` °9658 0-8/04/00 ABRAHAMSON Lo 538o00 797.659 08/04/0:0 ANDERSON 1 ,JULIE'M 79.3 3 7%6.60 08/04/00 ANDERSON ,TIMOTHY R 3:41.70 79-6,61 0-.8/0-4 00 BACHMAN NICOLE T 45o5O 79:662 0-8 f 04 00 BITT -NER, KATI E C 403oO7 79.663 GO 04/00 BODZIAKMICHAEL D 147.88 79664 018/04/00 CHAPMAN,DAN 0 15.000 50 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79665 08/0-4/00 CHAPMAN,,JENNY A 535*08 7.9:666 08./04/00 CMIEL. S 44.955 7-9-6.67 0:8/04/00 DAMROV C 154*70 7-9-668 08[04/00 D.EMPSEY,BETH M 120o10 796,69 0-8/04-/00 DeGRAW KRYSTAL M 55.8*99 7-9-6.70 G8/04/00 ENGFER,NATALIE A 94.50 79.671 08:/04/00 ERICKSON A 20e2 .0 791,672 08/04/00 FLOR PAT 23-s25 7.967 3 08/04/00 FONTAINE 15*98 79.674 0-8/04/00 FRETZ.S ARAH J 409*29 79-675 08 / 04 / GO FRUCI L 52.00 79,676 0,8/0.4/00 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 198*50 7:91,677 G8/-04/00 H.AGGERTY,KATHRYN A 13 5.0.0 79-678 08/-04/:00 HAGSTROM S 101*25 7,9679 08/04/00 HAWKE,,RYAN A 495.74 79.68-0 G8,./,O 4 / 0 0 HEIM, ANDREA J 116.00 79,6181 08/04/0 .0 HEINN REBECCA L 618*85 79 682 0.-8/04/00 HENLY SAMUEL E 19.50 79--683 0,8/0-4/00 HIL TS, CHRISTINE M 282975 7-9168-4 08/04/00 HOLMGREN M 530.68 79685 08/04/0.0 HORNING,. CHRISTOPHER M 22*75 7960066 08104 / 00 HOULE L 154980 79,687 08/04/00 HU -PPERT.,ERIN M 716907 79,6.8,8 OS / 04 / 0-0 IRISH D 214*50 79689 08/.04/00 JOHNSON P 396903 51 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 7969D 08/04/00 JOHNSON H 79691 G8/04/00 JOHNSON.,STETSON 112.00 79:692 08 [04 / GO KAHLER G 107*25 79.693 08/04/0-0 KERSCHNER R 68*25 79-694 08/04/00 KERSCHNER,jOLENE M 469*75 78695 08/0-4/0.0 KOEHNEN I MARY B 628905 75':6916 08/04/0,0 MEISEL TAMBREY 13 -6.4 2 796,97 018/04/00 MEVERDEN J 160*48 79698 08/0/x0 MILLS, ANNE K 3: .88 -0 719-6-99 08 / . 00 MOSSONG F ANDREA M 2-04e75 7,9700 08/04/00 MOTZ M 116.75 7,97-01 0:8/04/00 OIREAGAN 19,25 7910-2 0,81044100 OLSONIABIGAIL E 235*63 7 9 7 0 3 jol 0,81 /,-:0.4 0 0 OWENJONATHAN 363 io 0,7 7970.4 08/04/00 PEHOSKI I JOEL T 340*00 7-9705 08/041`0-0 SCHAEFER,ROB J 211o25 797-06 08/0.4/"Goo S D 55,5*41 797.10-7 0-1,81104 / 00. SlMONS0, JUSTIN M 563*13 79708 08 [0 4 / GO SMITLEY L 199000 79709 00/04/00 STEINKE P 513903 79710 08-/04/00 SWANER , JES S I CA 403*85 797:11 0:8/04/00 THELL,HEIDI 36e0 0 79712 08/04/00 TIBODEAU J 475900 79713 08/04/00 WARNER ICAROLYN 79*6-0 79714 08/014/00 WEDES H 117.00 52 CITY O F MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79:715 0,8 04 Go WELTER, ELI ZABETH M 294*75 7971-6 0,8/04/00 WHITE, NICOLE B 55.*25 79717 08/04/00 WHITE M 1699,05 7,9718 WHITING A 139*75 79,719 08/04/00 WILLIAMS M 1099*90 797-2:0 0,8,/04/010 WOODMAN, ALICE E 333o15 79721 08/04/00 WORWA M 227o61 79722 08/04/00 ZIELINSKIJENNIFER L 235905 79 OB / 0:4 / 0,0 BOSLEY 178*35 79724 08/04/00 GLASS, GILLIAN 136*00 7-9725 08/04/00 GROPPOLI LINDA M 131e25 797-26 - 08/04/00 - HANSEN,ANNA K 197*65 7 972 7 .08/0.4 00 HANSEN,EMILY J 18*00 7972,8 08/0-4/00 HUPPERT . ERICA L 91*50 79:729: O8/ 04 [00 JOHNSON, A .10 600 0 79730 0,8./,0.4/00 SCHROE DER 363o13 79731 08/04/00 SHERRILL A 78.78 79-732 08/04/00 ANTON SARAH E 342975 19733 08/04/00 BEHAN 1304903 79734 08/0,14/00 BOTTOLFSON , COLLIN R 36.0 0 79735 08 0 41-/ Go CHAPEAU I GREG M 548*87 7:9136 081.0-4/0-0 DOUGLAS I TOM 180. 00 79737 0,.8/04/00 DeGREE,AMANDA R 14 4.00 79738 0,8/04/00 HEMPFER W 25920 79719 08/04/0.0 JAHN J 1328.83 53 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER 79740 79741 79742 7974.3 79744 79745 7 97 4.6 79747 79 79-749 7975.0 79751 797" 55.2 7-975-3 797,54 CHECK DATE Ga./04/0-0 0..-$,/.014/00 .08/04/00 0810.4/00 08 / 04/ GO 08/04/00 G8/04/00 08/04/00 0.8/04/00 0$/04/00 G8/04/00 08 {04 /OQ 08/04/-00 0$/0400 08 /(34 /OD EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT KOSKI I JOHN F 881,v63 KYRK, ASHLEY .1089GO LESLIE.DUSTIN G 102.00 LONETTI., JAMES F 663*19 MAINA,FRANK 18900 MATTESON M 23-7o84 MORIN,TROY J 150.00 PATTERSON,ALBERT 630.42 PRINS.KELLY M 278.48 REILLY I MICHAEL R 784.28 SEVERSON. A 138.00 YOUNG,,DILLON J 350*00 AICHELE. J 2173429 MULVANEY M 1727.23 PRIEM, STEVEN A. 2593959 338844.43 54 MEMORANDUM ,fiction by Council TO: City Manager to FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Fin al Plat Endorsed Modified PROJECT: Towns of New Century Modified . fi • DATE: August 8, 2000 INTRODUCTION Steve Meyer is requesting that the city council approve the Towns of New Century final plat. Mr. Meyer represents the property owners, New Century Countyhomes LLC. This final plat is the first phase of the town houses for the New Century development, and would create 30 lots for town houses and one outlot for future phases of the development. This plat is on the east side of New Century Boulevard, north of Highwood Avenue, west of Century Avenue. (See the maps on pages 3 - 6.) BACKGROUND On July 12, 1999, the city council approved the following for the New Century PUD: 1. Changes to the comprehensive plan. These changes were from R -1 (single dwellings) and OS (open space) to R -1 (single dwellings), RH (residential high density) and OS (open space) for the site. The developer also asked the city to drop the planned minor collector street that would connect the east end of Schaller Drive with Century Avenue. This street would have gone through this site and through a group of oak trees. 2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) fora 178 -unit housing development. The applicant requested the CUP because the F (farm residence) and R -1 (single dwelling residential) zoning districts limit the uses to single dwellings in a typical or standard subdivision. (See the property line map on page four.) As approved by the city, this project will have 76 single dwellings (including the relocated farm house), 8 twin homes and 92 town houses. (See the site plan on page 6). Having a PUD gives the city and developer a chance to be more flexible with site design and development details than the standard zoning requirements would normally allow. The F and R -1 zoning districts also do not allow finrin homes, town houses or other multiple dwellings. Mr. Engstrom also asked the city to allow the houses in this development to have mother -in- law (accessory) apartments and have a variety of front and side -yard setbacks for the houses and town houses in the development. The city approved these as part of the PUD. 3. Street right -of -way and easement vacations. These were for the unused street right -of -ways and easements on the site. 4. A code variation for a substandard cul -de -sac where Schaller Drive meets the developer's west property line. The proposed development plans do not have a street connection to the existing temporary cul -de -sac at the east end of Schaller Drive. As such, the developer will need to change the existing temporary cul -de -sac into a permanent cul -de -sac. 5. Reduced building setbacks for the existing houses at 2610 and 2611 Schaller Drive. These setback approvals are necessary with changing the, temporary cul -de -sac on the east end of Schaller Drive to a permanent cul -de -sac. 6. A variation from the city code to reduce the required street right -of -way width. The developer wants to reduce some of the public street right -of -ways from 60 feet to 50 feet. 7. A variation from the city code to reduce the required street pavement width. The developer is asking to reduce the streets from 32 feet to 28 feet, 24 feet and 20 feet from gutter to gutter. 8. A preliminary plat to create the lots in the development. (See the map on page seven.) This approval was subject to eight conditions. 9. Having no parking for both sides of some of the streets and no parking for one side of other streets. 10. Starting the construction of up to four model homes before the city approves the final plat On January 24, 2000, the city council approved the first final plat for the New Century development. This final plat created 80 lots for houses, 3 outlots for open space and one outlot for future phases of the development (including the town houses). On May 23, 2000, the community design review board (CDRB) approved the project plans for the New Century Town Homes. This approval was for the site, building and landscape plans and was subject to eight conditions. (See the site plan on page 6.) DISCUSSION Mr. Meyer is progressing with this phase of the plat. The contractor has started installing the utilities in this part of the development. The developer has finished all the conditions the council required for final plat approval. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Towns: of New Century final plat. Approval is subject to the county recording the deeds, deed restrictions and covenants required by the city. p: sec 13 -28 /newcenth . f i n Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Proposed Final Plat 4. Site Plan 5. Preliminary Plat 6. 7 -12 -99 Council Minutes 7. Proposed Final Plat (Separate Attachment) 2 Attachment 1 16 1. HUNTINGTON CT, 2. OAKRIOGE LA. d Qe ONE = s4 r 7 � � � c� W. ND qV E 0 s � Kln/CA O'OAY y , o e � Cl � � � 8 oa DR.. � CT. $ � 0AlCRtOGE D� R. It HILLW000 2 . DR, � OUIKRIQC f Q ��� 1. CT toe "�jurnnn ,. A vryo U el�t Q ,HL AVE. UNWppp �,�`�' 'r PRO o S ca CARVER Ate• c OVERLOOK � 17 TIMBER CT. 11M � �� g z PHYt1S Cl'. � 1. CURRIE CT. 2. VALLEY VIEW CT. yq VALLEY V1EW AVE 0 � 3. LAKEWOOQ CT. AN 2 � u R j � HIGHWOOD iii v �n z � ��f g � �. NElr11T2 AVE z 0 A R ° 6 rvEMIrz AVE. SOUTHM AVE souni - OAK HEKiHTS C7, � U ' CREST AVE. 1AOREU Cr. 4,*V vryo U el�t `� a (1 BOXWOOD AV. o S ca CARVER Ate• c OVERLOOK � C� m o 0 3 a�- Fab, Carver Fla► G,ar Lake Aak LOCATION MAP 3 4 N Attachment 2 ' t. .. ' � 716 �.... .. ... ...... ...... ............... »..........�1.» »............ .. �.».. ...._.. .. ..... ».........._....»......_ ..............».._.-...»»....._....... ..............................» .......... ..... »....._..............�.... .. »....... LINWOOD A vE ,. .._ ...........� �........_._.... �........ ».._... . ...... ..................... .__. ... _. _. ». = ....... s i 2632 743 .. , N . ....... .._ ................... f i / � i•. f # - 751 - - - � 775 0 0 8 6 4 2 S8 ... _ .._... 658 �'�� ' h i °� h o f- {A N N n/ It U9 C4 X66 857 � N --_ » , ER 874 865 �`�'� �,...- ..4 N �� ; 842 8m N l N_.N N �... 873 I 's 850 ,'' ��' 849 A �r S .0. N Al • of � " 520 674 882 w . \ 2512 ' 2504 'f M .'.,. -.-• `-. �: 865 ' 916 _ ; 3 � �• t ».. N Nli PV f 928 N . _....:.. .......... ._......._.........:._..VIALL' E Y VIE W 1`i VE 31 f rn' 2500 2514 N 2532: 2544 = N : 2511 N 2525 2539 Cj) --i L w HIG A 971 970 965 966 967 968 967 979 978 973 974 975 976 975 2492 987 986 ...� 981 » _ 983 ON 9 .. en. .. 9B9 I AQQn n Property Line Map 4 4 N SITE 909 923 ........_.... t i Z �._ ._ ».......�� ......»...........».._.._ ....... . ......... .... .. ..... ......r ........ .. �..�....».............. _.. »......_...� 2660 2 7 30 2714 = j 978 984 i ' n Property Line Map 4 4 N Attachment 3 o Os O I � 'L vr =Z i 0 00 { 0 S 6C.. A 3. 4 - 5 srob 00 4• 194, 1 Aoki, 40 Ls Co 0 4n 19 . o M -,- L ft — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ;- i -j 634.58 S88035'38"W :.1-. 100 117 'HIGHWOOD ANEW ----------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — r — — — — — — — — — — —ARVER PROPOSED FINAL PLAT TOWNS OF NEW CENTURY 0 . I -e .c I Co 0 4n 19 . o M -,- L ft — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ;- i -j 634.58 S88035'38"W :.1-. 100 117 'HIGHWOOD ANEW ----------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — r — — — — — — — — — — —ARVER PROPOSED FINAL PLAT TOWNS OF NEW CENTURY 0 . Attachment 4 PROPOSED NEW CENTURY FUTURE PHASE OF TOWN HOMES MULTI — FAMILY � ' "-, •��1 '�� +� . � ,�J � ' 1 • ' / I ••. 1 ` '�. •--•.. * 1 r- -:�r_, r ; � , s 1 _• IV tv Ar • J � • t �• I`� •� � I • j ; I t ^' , f; �• J � , � � •f' ` �='�.�� r iLr�1•i4.M�� �� ± •� � i So Max Wo I LLJ •! i, l 1• / 1: I 1 doo Ap 9 lit `�� •�M I ,' / 1. , � .= . r • 1 . 1 �� • �' � � 1 � �� �•��.�M� -�� �•.'..• , , i • ui It r ♦ 1 t. • • � 1 • �. �+ � - it i • — i -�1 1 1 i :1- 1 1 •' ! 1 Jot Sep rb s f •� .N l '� •1 _..y • ~� __�. _sue �'•-- •� • j ,'_j�'`�i! 1 I �k. '1i� �I +.. . �' w. w i.v • /1 • � j � �.• I �r ••�• t ry •.��! ..t j..r �� �, � . ...w .. • � .... « .• . •. �•' «. � • . !• :• ; ' ,' �• HIGHWOOD AVENUE SITE PLAN 4 N 6 Attachment 5 Q:p 10-:75 W IC PRELIMINARY PLAT AGENDA ITEM ( ; AGENDA REPORT TO: Ken Haider, City Engineer FROM: Lance Lundsten, Public Works Coordinator SUBJECT: Surplus Property Disposal DATE: August 4, 2000 ,Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified Dejected Declare as surplus property and authorize disposal at State auction the following equipment: 1.) City Unit #535, 1986 Ford LN8000 single -axle dump /plow truck. S.N. 1 FDYR80U3GVA58316 2.) City Unit #538, 1986 Ford LN8000 single -axle dump /plow truck. S.N. 1 FDYR80U3GVA58317 These trucks have been replaced. LAL meo Agenda No. AGENDA REPORT To: Acting City Manager Kenneth Haider From: From: Chief of Police Donald Winger Subject: Alcohol Compliance Grant Date: July 20, 2000 Action by Counci, �3a�e Endorsed A40di ied Rejected Introduction The Police Department has applied for a grant from the Department of Public Safety for the purpose of alcohol compliance enforcement. Council approval in needed to accept the grant funds. Background The Department,of Public Safety, .Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division, has made available funding for alcohol compliance checks. These funds will be used to reimburse officer's wages ($1,850), pay trained buyer's wages($485), and purchase equipment ($1,925). The amount of the grant is $4,260. Recommendation It is recommended that the Council approve participation in the alcohol compliance program and approve acceptance of the grant funds. AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: August 7, 2000 RE: Temporary Gambling License for Hill- Murray School Introduction Acdoo by connc Date Endorsed Modified Rejected Hill - Murray School, with a listed address of 2625 Larpenteur Avenue East, has submitted an application for a temporary gambling license to conduct a raffle on October 18, 2000. Background The purpose of the organization is to promote youth activities and education. Recommendation It is recommended that council approve the application for a temporary gambling license for the Hill- Murray School. AGENDA NO. G i 6 AGENDA REPORT TO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: August 7, 2000 Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified Rejected RE: Temporary Strong Beer and Wine License for Church of Saint Jerome Introduction The Church of Saint Jerome, with a listed address of 749 Skillman Avenue East, has submitted an application for a temporary one day strong beer and wine license to be used at their fall festival that will be held on the church and school grounds on September 17, 2000. The proceeds will be used to supplement the parish and school funds. Background City Code directs that temporary one -day strong beer and wine licenses be approved by the City Council. In issuing these licenses it has not been prior practice to conduct investigations on temporary permits. Recommendation It is recommended to approve the application for a temporary one day strong beer and wine license to the Church of Saint Jerome. Agenda am" f7 MEMORANDUM TO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: August 8, 2000 RE: Certification of Election Judges The following Resolution needs to be adopted for certification of the list of Election Judges for the September 12, 2000 Primary Election. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ELECTION JUDGES RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of Election Judges for the 2000 Primary Election, being held on Tuesday, September 12, 2000: PRECINCT NO. 1 Audrey Duellman DeLores Fastner Marie Grenz Joan Kolasa Marvella Lackner Louise Nieters Schroepfer, Harriet PRECINCT NO.2 Betty Granger Jacqueline Hayne Barbara Johnson Joseph Kolasa Rose Marie Manders Esther Maudal James Nieman Elizabeth Olson Jacque Phillippi Milo Thompson PRECINCT NO. 3 Jaime Belland Pat Blank Jean Dickson Kathy Dittle Barbara Gallagher Jeff Janacek Rosemary Koch Pat Thompson Carmen Tomaszewski Gene Wandersee PRECINCT NO.4 Geraldine Callahan Lori Colliander Virginia Dehn Grace Dornfeld Fred DuCharme Walter Hayde Carol Knauss Maryanne Kuperschmidt Barbara Leiter Joan Misgen David Pehl Lorraine Rosauer Jessica Ryden Mary Vante John Willy Steve Young PRECINCT NO. 5 Anne Cardenas Diane Droeger Marge Dvorak Betty Eddy Shirly Evertz Thelma Ling Blaine Markie Patricia Trumble Cecilia Tucker PRECINCT NO. 6 Elizabeth Adams Joan Button Margaret Cokley Mae Davidson MaryAnn Franssen John Henry Richard Lambert William Little RoseMarie Rossi PRECINCT NO. 7 Jeanette Bunde Ron Kockelman Rita Lally Howard Muraski Mary Ann Schneider Don Schroepfer PRECINCT NO. 8 Gerald Behm John Eineke Bob Flood Bevery Gelao Gloria Kittel Claire Markie Karyl Petersen Rita Taylor Sandra Wittmann PRECINCT NO. 9 Elsie Anderson BerniceDel Monte Kumud Desai Grace Locke Carol Mahre Katherine Mollers Lorraine Petschel Barbara Vandeveer PRECINCT NO. 10 Joan Cottrell Ann Fallon Betty Haas Mona Krekelberg Neva Norman Marlene Reitmann D. Franklin Tolbert Lillian Yekaldo PRECINCT NO. 11 Lorraine Fischer Mary Fischer Rita Fredrickson Edward Kuehnel Betty Mossong Ruth Prettner Louis Spies PRECINCT NO. 12 Lucille Cahanes Jennifer Hollerbach Don Jungmann Margaret Kunde Jackie Meyer Arthur Mollica Beverly Ogilvie Phyllis Pauly Larry Schaaf Evelyn Skluzacek PRECINCT NO. 13 Anne Fosburgh Mark Gilstad Diane Golaske Anna Mae Hogan Don Jungmann PRECINCT NO. 14 Shirley Luttrell Carol Berger Constance Hines Helen King Anita Larson Delores Lofgren Kenneth Sullivan PRECINCT NO. 15 Margaret Arneberg Delores Fitzgerald Guy Grant Carol Hamre Lorraine Lauren Richard Lofgren Delores Marsch Elaine Rudeen Florence Sajevic Theresa Sullivan Geraldine Trooien Martha Wells PRECINCT NO. 16 Joan Bartelt Carol Berthianume Catherine Falenzer Carolyn Eickhoff Mary Grant Carol Hamre Mildred Iversen Gayle Wasmundt G -k MEMO To: Acting City Manager Ken Haider From; Director of Emergency Management Larry J. Cude Subject: Resolution Authorizing .Execution of Sub -Grant Agreement Date: July 21, 2000 Action by council Date En dorsed MW, Reject On July 12, 2000 a Presidential Disaster Declaration was received, that included Ramsey County, y, for storm damages that occurred between May 17 through July 12, 2000. The Cit of Maplewood, being in Ramsey County, is eligible to receive assistance for actual casts incurred for uninsured damages to public property, including ebris removal and cleanup, an storms g p, y � s occurring during this time. The funding formula for the disaster assistance is 75 % Federal 15 State and the remaining 1 % is the responsibility of the City of Maplewood. In order to receive the Federal and State disaster assistance, the attached Resolution Authorizing Execution of Sub -Grant Agreement needs to be approved by the City Council. LJC:ajo attachment CIO RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUB -GRANT AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEwOOD, MINNESOTA, enter into a Sub -grant agreement with the Division of Emergency Management in the Minnesota g Y g Department of Public Safety for the program entitled Infrastructure Program for FEMA 1333 DR- MINNESOTA. Acting City Manager Ken Haider is hereby authorized to execute and sign such Sub -grant Agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City of Maplewood. I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota on August 14, 2000. SIGNED: (Signature) (Title) (Date) WITNESSED: (Signature) (Title) (Date) Action by Council Date MEMORANDUM Endorsed TO: O: City Manager FROM: Re Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Update - Historic R esources esources Management Plan DATE: June 29, 2000 INTRODUCTION Mr. Robert Overby, a member of the Maplewood Area Historical Society (MANS), has asked the city to consider adding a Historic Resources Management Plan to the Comprehensive Plan. He has submitted a draft plan for the city's review and consideration. (See the draft plan starting on page 3.) BACKGROUND Minnesota State law required all cities in the metro area to update their comprehensive s p p ensive plans by the end of 1999. City s taff has completed a draft update of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan as the law required. We have submitted the e draft plan to the Metropolitan Council and surrounding cities for their review and comment. DISCUSSION The draft of the proposed Historic Resources Management Plan that the Maplewood cal Society re p ood Area Histori y p pared has several parts. These include planning guidelines, standards and guidelines for preservation planning, an outline for a program in Maplewood, preservation p , p anon planning goals, preservation planning policies and an implementation and an action plan. It appears that this plan would put much more emphasis on historic reservation and on hi in Maplewood than h p historic planning p as occurred in the past. This would include forming a Maplewood Heritage Preservation Commission and having them review development, building applications for p � g and demolition a pp r their possible impact on historic resources. The Maplewood Area Historical Society has prepared a list of ro erties that the ' s p p y believe are historically g t in the city. (See the list starting on page 11.) They want to use this list as a starting point for the inventory of properties that would be affected b the historic r might ado Y preservation policies that the city g pt. It might be helpful for city staff to review and give comments to the historical society about the properties on this list. I also have included on page 14 a copy of City Ordinance No. 755 that the city y council adopted in 1996. This ordinance created Maplewood Historical Commission as an advisory board to the city council. This ordinance is scheduled to sunset at the end of 2000. Staff has several concerns about the proposed Historic Resources Management g ment Plan and its impact on city policies and practices. The city must roceed careful) to en is p Y sure that whatever the council adop or approves is really in the best interest of the entire city. To answer some of staff's questions about historic preservation, Mr. Overby provided us with additional ' y p information about some of the key points. This information is in his memos dated May 18 2000 and J 2000 on pages 17 and 18. Y June 19, It is important to note that the Maplewood Area Historical Society (MANS) has been receiving city support and about $2,000 a year for expenses. If the city council agrees that the Maplewood Historical Commission should continue as an organized city commission for advising the city council, then the city support and funds should be directed to the Historical Commission and not to the MANS. City staff revised the draft of the historic resources management plan to better fit the style and format of the rest of the comprehensive plan. Our version of this plan starts on page 19. Much of the content of staff s plan is the same as the draft plan from the Historical Society. However, I added a purpose section and a section titled "Discussion, Challenges and Issues" that the planning commission and city council should pay careful attention to. COMMISSION ACTION On February 7, 2000, the planning commission reviewed the draft of the Historic Resources Management Plan. The commission had several concerns and questions about the proposed plan. They recommend that the city council review the status of the Historic Preservation Commission and also review and consider the proposed Historic Resources Management Plan. On March 6, 2000, the planning commission reviewed a revised Historic Resources Management Plan as drafted by city staff. The commission had several questions and concerns about the proposed plan. They asked city staff to work with Robert Overby when making changes to the plan and to bring the plan back to the Planning Commission for further review. On April 3, 2000, the planning commission again reviewed the proposed Historic Resources Management Plan as drafted and revised by city staff. The commission recommended approval of the proposed plan, subject to staff making changes to the plan. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Direct city staff to give comments or feedback about the historic properties on the attached list dated 2- 18 -00. B. Review, discuss and take action on the proposed Historic Resources Management Plan dated 3- 31 -00. The council should also consider the status of the Maplewood Historical Commission and what, if any, city support and funding the city should provide for this commission.. For the past few years the city has budgeted $2,000 for the Maplewood Historical Society. Staff recommends no change to the funding level but asks that the Historical Society decide which group receives the funds (the Society or the newly created Commission.) p:compplan\preserv2.mem Attachments: 1. January 2000 draft Historic Resources Management Plan 2. List of Maplewood Historic Properties dated 2 -18 -00 3. Maplewood Ordinance x#755 dated 5 -13 -96 4. May 18, 2000 memo from Robert Overby 5. June 19, 2000 memo from Robert Overby 6. Historic Resources Management Plan dated 3 -31 -00 (city staff proposal) 2 Attachment 1 MAPLEWOOD HISTORIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN January 2000 ********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** fl R VISION "We live not alone in the present, but also in the past and future. The radius that circumscribes our lives must necessarily extend back indefinitely and forward infinitely. We can never look out thoughtfully at our immediate surroundings but a course of reasoning will start up, leading us to inquire the causes that produced the development around us, and at the same time we are led to conjecture the results to follow causes now in operation. We are thus linked indissolubly with the past and the future." (1) A more modern description of why history is important to people and communities is found in the following quote from a recently published book: "Nostalgia is forever preserved by tradition, by the sense of being part of something that has endured over time ". (2) At the time this comprehensive plan was being updated, Maplewood had grown through 43 years since its incorporation in 1957. Before that, the Township of New Canada had endured for 99 years since its founding in 1858. The Maplewood Comprehensive Plan will, among other things: - guide future growth and development in an orderly manner; - define the proper functional relationships between different types of land uses; - help to coordinate public and private sector decisions; - establish a framework to guide and involve citizen_ participation in City government; and - provide for a sense of community and neighborhood identity. All of the above - listed purposes of the City comprehensive plan can be informed by and supported by an effective historic resources plan, and by citizens and decision - makers who use the guidance of this plan chapter to preserve historic, cultural, and archeological resources In Maplewood. The Historic Resources Plan is also connected to many of the goals of the City of Maplewood, as described elsewhere in this comprehensive plan (pages 7,8): • Human Rights Goal • Citizen Involvement Goal • Communication Goal • City Implementation Goal • Cultural /Leisure Activity Goal • Economic /Tourism Goal • Significant Natural Features Goal • Urban Design Goal In its efforts to preserve and protect historic resources in Maplewood, the City will refer to the above goals and related policies, and make decisions to plan and implement programs consistent with those goals and policies, and with the goals and policies in this plan chapter for historic resources. (1) From "History of Dakota County ", by Reverend Edward D. Neill (1880). (2) From "In a Time of Fallen Heroes, by William Betcher and William Pollack (19 J. 3 The Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minn. Statutes, Section 473.859, subdivision 2) specifies the required and optional elements of comprehensive plans for cities in the 7- county metropolitan area. In regard to historic preservation, the statute states that: "... A land use plan shall contain a protection element, as appropriate, for historic sites..." The Metropolitan Council's Regional Blueprint (the Council's regional policy plan) promotes the use of historic preservation as a tool to develop or enhance a community's identity. In 1997, the Council developed a "Local Planning Handbook to assist metropolitans communities in updating their comprehensive plans. For the subject of historic preservation, the handbook states: "Because the Council does not have specific regional standards or policies with regard to a historic preservation element of a comprehensive plan, each community is free to interpret this requirement in its own way ". Planning Guidelines However, the Council's handbook does contain the following suggested guidelines for a historic preservation plan element: 1. Under state enabling legislation, a community may establish a Heritage Preservation Commission. Its purposes and powers are "to promote the use and conservation of historic properties for the education, inspiration, pleasure, and enrichment of the citizens" (Minn. Statutes, section 471.193). Maplewood established a Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) in 19 _ , and the City Council appointed members with two -year terms. The HPC has responsibilities for identifying, registering, protecting, and enhancing heritage resources in Maplewood, and for establishing a broad planning direction for the proposed historic preservation program. The HPC also played a critical role in creating this plan chapter and working with City staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council to review and adopt it as part of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. Members of the HPC also serve on the Maplewood Area Historical Society (MARS), which was first established in 19 _ , was temporarily inactive, and then was revived in 19 _. In addition to working on this comprehensive plan chapter, the MAHS also: 2. The ordinance that establishes a Heritage Preservation Commission includes a system to inventory and evaluate historical resources in Maplewood, and to establish measures to protect those resources (for example, local controls and building permit review). The Maplewood City Council, the HPC, and the MAHS need to discuss and form a plan of how an inventory and evaluation of historic resources should be conducted, using this, plan chapter as a guide. Once this inventory has been done, then the City Council should select the measures for protecting identified historic resources. The inventory and protection measures form the basis for decisions about what properties in Maplewood are historically or culturally significant, and therefore worthy of preservation. 3. Once a community has established a Heritage Preservation Commission ordinance, it becomes eligible to apply to the State Historical Preservation Office (part of the Minnesota Historical Society) to become a "Certified Local Government" (CLG). This certification makes the community eligible to apply for federal funds to plan for historic preservation projects. The City of Maplewood will work with the HPC and the MARS in applying for CLG status for Maplewood. 4. Inventories of historic properties and planning work should be done to conform with standards and guidelines of the Secretary of Interior for historic preservation projects. it is very important that the City of Maplewood, the HPC., and the MAHS, follow the Secretary of Interior's Standards when planning and implementing this chapter of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, a portion of those standards have been included below. I 11 1, Will A. Standards for Preservation Planning 1. Preservation Planning Establishes Historic Contexts. a. "Decisions about... historic properties are most reliably made when the relationship of individual properties to other similar properties is understood." Information about historic properties which represent aspects of history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture must be collected and organized to define these relationships. This organizational framework is called a historic context The historic context organizes information based on a cultural theme and its geographical and chronological limits. Contexts describe the significant broad patterns of development in an area that may be represented by historic properties. The development of historic contexts is the foundation for decisions about identification, evaluation, registration, and treatment of historic properties. b. "Develop goals, policies and priorities for the identification, registration, and treatment of historic properties." This task should be pursued by the City of Maplewood, the HPC, and the MAHS, after this plan chapter is adopted by the City Council. 2. Integrate the results of preservation planning into broader planning. The City of Maplewood should use this plan chapter and the Secretary's standards and guidelines where historic and cultural preservation impacts other planning goals, policies, and programs in Maplewood. B. Guidelines for Preservation Planning 1. Link the standards with more specific guidance and technical information. This task needs to be pursued after this plan chapter is adopted. 2. Management of the planning process (these are "must" elements). a. Develop an explicit approach to plan implementation. b. Provide for ongoing and periodic review and revision of the plan. c. Provide a mechanism for resolving conflicts within the overall set of preservation goals, and conflicts between this set of goals and other goals in the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. 5 3. Development of Historic Contexts. (The cornerstone of the planning process for historic preservation.) A comprehensive summary of the history of Maplewood can be created by developing a set of historic contexts that will include all significant historic and cultural properties (and sites) in the City. The State Historic Preservation Office generally possesses the most complete information... and in the best position to coordinate the use and development of historic contexts. 4. Developing Goals for a Historic Context. a. A gwLfor this purpose is a statement of preferred preservation activities, generally stated in terms of property types. b. The purpose of having goals for historic contexts is to set forth the 'best case' version of how properties should be identified, evaluated, registered, and treated. c. Develop goal statements for each historic context in Maplewood. d. Set priorities for the goals. 5. Integrate the Individual Historic Contexts. a. Reconcile competing goals and priorities in overlapping geographic areas. One approach that Maplewood could use for this task is to identify which historic contexts affect each of the City's thirteen neighborhood planning areas (see the Land Use Plan chapter for maps). Neighborhood maps of significant historic properties and related historic contexts should be prepared, and then integrated by their goals and priorities. b. Reconcile the ranking of goals. c. Establish an overall set of priorities for several historic contexts. d. List the activities which must be done to achieve the ranked goals. NOTE: When tasks 5 (c) and (d) are applied to a specific geographic area, this becomes the preservation plan for that area. 6. Integrate with Planning and Management Frameworks. Adapt preservation goals and priorities to land units, by integrating them with other planning concerns. This involves resolving conflicts that arise when competing resources occupy the same land use base. The remaining sections of the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines include the following: C. Standards for Identification D. Standards for Evaluation E. Standards for Registration F. Standards for Historical Documentation G. Standards for Architectural and Engineering Documentation L H. Standards for Archeological Documentation I. Standards for Historic Preservation Projects 1. General Standards 2. Specific Standards a. acquisition b. protection c. stabilization d. preservation e. rehabilitation f. restoration g. reconstruction OUTLINE OF A HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM FOR MAPLEWOOD 1. The Historic Resources Management Plan and an ordinance for historic preservation. The preservation plan provides the policy and legal framework for decisions on the preservation, protection, and use of heritage resources. The preservation ordinance provides the legal basis for implementing the program. 2. The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC). The citizen advisory panel appointed by the City Council, which has major responsibilities for identifying, registering, protecting, and enhancing the heritage resources in Maplewood and for establishing a broad planning direction for the City's preservation program. 3. The Inventory of Heritage Resources. Heritage resources can include historically or culturally important objects, structures, buildings, sites, or districts. The heritage resources inventory forms the basis for decisions about what properties in Maplewood are historically or culturally significant, and therefore worthy of preservation. 4. Local Historic Contexts for Heritage Resources. Information about heritage resources is organized into historic contexts, based on a cultural theme, geography, and chronology (time period). 7 5. Designation of Maplewood Heritage Landmarks. Designation of historically or culturally significant objects, structures, buildings, sites, and districts. To be designated a heritage landmark, a I property must meet specific criteria for determining historical significance. Besides local registration, certain properties may qualify for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. Properties listed on the National Register are recognized for their historical Significance, and any alteration or demolition may be prohibited or strictly regulated. Creating a register of significant historical properties is a critical planning tool for historic preservation. 6. Review and Compliance. The Maplewood Heritage Preservation Commission will review plans for new construction, moving buildings, and building demolition in relation to designated historic landmarks. Plans and projects which meet established standards for preservation will be granted a Certificate of Appropriateness. 7. Certification as a Certified Local Government. Maplewood has a Heritage Preservation Commission, so the City is eligible to apply for this certification. Once certification is received, Maplewood may participate in the CLG preservation partnership that was established by the National Historic Preservation Act. Through a grants -in -aid program, federal funding is available to finance activities such as the local inventory of historic resources, historic preservation planning, and education. 8. Encourage Public Participation and Education. The Maplewood Heritage Preservation Commission and the Maplewood Area Historical Society will work with the City of Maplewood to promote historic preservation in Maplewood through preservation plans, educational programs, and publication of technical and informational materials. 9. Adoption of the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines. These are the basic standards and guidelines for historic preservation, and they should be the accepted reference in the City of Maplewood. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNING GOALS 1. Maplewood will use this Historic Resources Management Plan to support the preservation, protection, conservation, and wise use of the significant historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological objects, structures, buildings, sites, and districts in the City. 2. Maplewood will develop the historic preservation program proposed in this plan, and will integrate the program with other planning programs in the City. 3. Maplewood will use this plan to establish a comprehensive framework for all decisions and actions related to historic preservation. 4. Maplewood will follow the Secretary of Interior's standards and guidelines for archeology and historic preservation. 5. Maplewood will work with the Heritage Preservation Commission and the Maplewood Area Historical Society to identify, document, and evaluate the historical significance of objects, structures, buildings, sites, and districts in the City, and consider their preservation potential. 0 6. Maplewood will protect, preserve, and enhance the significant heritage resources in Maplewood by designating them as Maplewood Heritage Landmarks, and where appropriate, by nominating them to the National Register of Historic Places. 7. Maplewood will work with property owners to preserve the heritage resource value and historical integrity of significant historical or cultural resources affected by projects that are permitted, assisted, or funded by the City. 8. Maplewood will support research and public education on the preservation, protection, and use of heritage resources in the City. 9. Maplewood will encourage broad citizen participation in historic preservation activities, in order to obtain the knowledge,. insights, and support of City residents. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNING POLICIES 1. The Heritage Preservation Commission will advise and assist the Maplewood City Council and City staff about historic preservation matters. 2. Historic preservation goals and policies will be implemented by linking them with other City programs and activities, including but not limited to zoning, code enforcement, housing, economic development, and public works. 3. Maplewood will work with the State Historic Preservation Office of the Minnesota Historical Society in implementing this preservation plan. 4. The Maplewood Heritage Preservation Commission will issue a finding of significance for individual objects, structures, buildings, sites, and districts to determine whether they are eligible for designation as Maplewood Heritage Landmarks. 5. The Maplewood Heritage Resources Inventory will be maintained by the Heritage Preservation Commission, with assistance from City staff. 6. Before the City Council designates a property as a Maplewood Heritage Landmark, there will be a preservation planning report completed. 7. Properties designated as Maplewood Heritage Landmarks will be placed on the official zoning map of Maplewood. 8. The Heritage Preservation Commission will review all applications or permits for demolition, moving a building, and new construction to determine their impacts on significant heritage resources. 9. In cooperation with City staff and the Maplewood Planning Commission, the Heritage Preservation Commission will review all plats, rezonings, conditional use permits, and site plans to determine their impacts on significant heritage resources. 10. Maplewood will encourage voluntary compliance with historic preservation standards and guidelines by property owners proposing work on historic properties carried out under City building permits. 11. Maplewood will use the Secretary of the Interior's standards and guidelines as the required basis for design review decision. E 12. Maplewood may issue permits or approve development plans that include conditions for historic preservation, based upon the recommendations of the Heritage Preservation Commission. 13. Maplewood will provide information about historic preservation to property owners and to the general public. 14. The Heritage Preservation Commission and /or the Maplewood Area Historical Society will advise schools and teachers in the development of curricula about history and historic preservation in Maplewood. IMPLEMENTATION AND ACTION PLAN 1. Adopt and implement the historic resources management plan. 2. Review the Maplewood ordinances and amend as needed to reflect the goals and policies for historic preservation. 3. Undertake a comprehensive survey of all objects, structures, buildings, sites, and districts that are over 50 years old in Maplewood. 4. Provide City officials and the public with information on properties that are historically or culturally significant. 5. Designate significant historic or cultural properties as Maplewood Heritage Landmarks, and nominate appropriate properties for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 6. Use the Secretary of Interior's standards and guidelines to advise owners of historic properties on maintenance and restoration work. 7. Provide public information and education about historic preservation. 8. Establish a program of local historical markers and plaques. 9. Provide staff support to the Heritage Preservation Commission and the Maplewood Area Historical Society. 10. Work with the Heritage Preservation Commission and the Maplewood Area Historical Society to develop teaching aids about Maplewood history and historic preservation. pf:cAwpwinlofficelfrm\comph is. 1 10 Attachment 2 City of Maplewood Historic Properties 2-19-00 This is a partial list of historic properties in Maplewood. This list was comprised considering the age, significance, and function of the building and/or property. Sites Already Designated on the National Register of Historic Places 1. 2020 N White Bear Avenue, Ramsey County Poor Farm Barn Sites Eligible for Distinction on the National Register of Historic Places 1. 741 E Co Rd B, House 2. 1800 N Edgerton Street, Forest Cemetery Mausoleum 3. 1800 E. Shore Drive. Seaholm P. Gottfried House 4. 2166 Maplewood Drive, Keller Golf Clubhouse 5. 2792 N. Highway 61, KSTP Transmitter 6. 2020 N White Bear Avenue Ramsey County Poor Farm Milkhouse, Garage, Smokestack Additional Sites of Ma r Si gnificance 1. 1900 Clarence Street "First Maplewood Village Hall /Gladstone Fire Station" 2. 1249 Frost Avenue "Second Maplewood Village/City Hall" 3. 1350 Frost Avenue Mikes L.P Gas (Former Keller Grocery Store) 4. 1741 N Arcade Street, St. Paul Tourist Cabins sign (Missing 1998) 5. 940 Frost Avenue "Original St. Paul Tourist Cabins." 6. 1865 Clarence Street, House "Sundgaard House" 7. 1780 Clarence Street, House 8. 1825 N. Desoto Street 9. 1915 N Desoto Street House 10. 1745 N Edgerton Street, House 11. 2684 W. Highwood Avenue, "Carver Lake School" 12. 1900 N. Rice Street, "St. Paul Water Works" 13.2150 Rice Street, "House" 14. 380 E Roselawn Avenue, "Church of St. Jerome" 15. 1559 County Road C, "House" 16. 900 Kohlman Lane, "House" 17. 2200 English Street,* "House" 18. 1467 County Road B, "House" 19. 2155 Prosperity Road, "House" 20. 1503 Frost Avenue,,* "Holmberg House" 21. 1826 Birmingham Street* "House" 22. 1821 Manton Street* "House" 23. 1280 Frisbie Ave * "House" 24. 1254 Frisbie Ave* "House" 25. 1933 Arcade "House" 26. 1700 Bradley Street "House" 27. 1685 Edgerton Street "House" 11 28.* 1730 Sylvan St. "House" 29. 1741 McMenemy St. "House" 30. 2670 Minnehaha Ave. "House" 31. 1480 Sterling "John Ledo House" 32. 1889 Clarence "Frost, Schroer, Recktenwald House" 33. 970 County Road C "House" 34. 2170 Day Road "House" 35. 923 Century Ave S. "House" 36. 2492 Highwood Ave. "House" 37. 1904 Manton Street* "House" 38. 1894 Birmingham Street 39. 1851 Clarence Street "House' 40. 1780 English Street* "House" 41. 1279 Ripley Street "House" 42. 1285 Ripley Avenue* "House" 43. 1765 McMenemy "St. Paul Hmong Alliance Church' 44. 1745 Edgerton St. "House" 45. 601 Kingston Ave. "House" 46. 2410 Carver Ave. "House" 47. 1640 Myrtle Ave. "House" 48. 2483 Maplewood Drive "Zuercher House" 49.- County Road C& Hazelwood "Kohler House" 50. 1890 Birmingham Street* "House" 51. 1895 Manton Street "House" 52. 1450 Ripley Avenue "House" 53.2071 English Street "House" 54. 1685 English Street* "House" 55. 1930 Edgerton Street "House" 56. 1750 McMenemy Street "House" 57. 1777 Edgerton Street "House" 58. 1203 Parkway Drive "House" 59. 1741 Arcade Street "House" 60. 2710 Maryland Avenue "House" 61 2591 Stillwater Road "House" 62. 2510 Carver Avenue "Ledo House" 63. 1501 Henry Lane "Schlomka House" 64. 1915 Desoto Street "House" 65. 1865 Clarence Street "House" 66. New Location of Bruentrup Farm Other properties/businesses 1. Gladstone Shops Ruins 2. Ramsey County Cemetery 3. Poor Farm Cow Tunnel at Wakefield 4. Tourist Cabins Sign 12 5. Plaza Theatre (oldest theatre in Maplewood) 6. Northernaire Motel (oldest motel in Maplewood) 7. First Maplewood Library building 8. WPA dam on Keller Creek 9. Building #1(3M naming101 ?) at 3M, mid 1950's * These are likely the working class homes built in the late 1880's to 1890's for Gladstone Workers. About 50 wood frame and terra cotta houses were built during this time for workers of the Gladstone Shops and the St. Paul Plow Works 13 f. Councilmember Rossbach mi 19, 1996 for a used car the east side of Highwa Communi tv Devel oDment mi Seconded by Councilmember Ko H. AWARD OF BIDS T I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 3DD rove the site D146 date - lot and bac d shed sale )uth of unt Road D. Th ve ., . or chang Ayes..- all Attachment 3 on of 1. Historical Advisory Commission /Historical Society Ordinance - Second Reading a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. City Attorney Kelly presented the history and details of the proposed Ordinance creating the History Commission. c. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Ordinance for second reading and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 755 1 V� ORDINANCE FOR MAPLEWOOD HISTORICAL ADVISORY COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREIN ORDAIN: Article IV, Secs. 2 -87 to 2 -99 is hereby added to read as follows: DIVISION 4. HISTORICAL COMMISSION Sec. 2 -87 Established There is hereby established for the City a Historical Commission as an advisory board to the City Council, as provided in Minnesota a u es nnotated Sections 471.93 and 138.51. Sec., 2 -88. Statement of public policy and purpose. It is hereby declared by the City Council that it is the public policy of the City to engage in a comprehensive program of historic preservation and to promote the use and conservation of historic properties for the education, inspiration, pleasure, and enrichment of the citizens of the Maplewood area. Sec. 2 -89. Advisory body: All ' actions of the Historical Commission shall be in the nature of recommendations to the City Council, and said uommission shall have no final authority with reference to any matters, except as the Council may lawfully delegate authority to it. 5 -13 -96 14 Sec. 2 -90. Composition; Appointment; Qualifications; Terms (a) The Historical Commission shall be composed of 7 members appointed by the City Council, who shall be residents of the City, and shall be selected to assure that the Commission is representative of the various areas of the City and responsive to the needs of the City. The unexpired portion of the year in which the appointments are made shall be considered as one year. All terms shall expire on December 31 of the year in which the ap ointment terminates. As the terms ex ire, all appointments thereafter sha 1 be for a term of 3 years, and a mem er may only be reappointed for one additional term. The first board appointed by the Council shall serve as follows: three members for three years and four members for two -year terms. After the two -year terms expire, all appointments shall be three-year appointments. Sec. 2 -91. Officers Generally. The chairperson and vice- chairperson of the Historical Commission shall be elected by the Historical Commission at the first meeting in January of each year from among the members of the Historical Commission. The chairperson shall be responsible for calling and presiding over all meetings and shall be entitled,to an equal vote with other members of the Commission. Sec. 2 -92. Vacancies. AV (a) Any of the following may cause the office of a Historical Commissioner to become vacated: (1) Death or removal from the City; (2) Disability or failure to serve. as shown by failure to attend _ four (4) meetings in any year, may be cause for removal by the Council majority, unless good cause can be shown to the Council. (3) Resignation in writing. (4) Taking of public office in the City. Sec. 2 -93. Officers, Meetings, Rules of Procedure; Public Attendance; etc. (a) The . stori cal Commission shall establish meeting times and adopt its own Rules of Procedure to be reviewed and approved by the City Council. (b) All meetings of this Commission shall-be open to the public and shall be housed in such manner as to permit public attendance. Sec. 2.94, Powers. The powers of the Historical Commission shall be as follows: (1) Recommend districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that are of historical, archeological, engineering or cultural significance. (2) Accept donations, funds and property on behalf of the City. (3) Assist in the establishment of a non - profit Maplewood Area Historical Society. No power shall be exercised by the Commission which is contrary to a State law or denied by the City by its charter or law. The powers of the Commission shall be �n exercised only in a manner prescribed by ordinance and no action of a Commission shall contravene any provision of the City's zoning or planning ordinance unless expressly authorized by an ordinance. 5 -13 -96 15 Sec. 2 -95. Duties and Responsibilities. The duties of the Historical Commission shall be as follows: (1) To discover and collect any and all material which may establish or illustrate the history of the City. (2) The Commission may publish any and all materials which may bear upon this history. (3) To provide for the guidelines for any and all material necessary to fulfill its purpose. -- Sec . 2.96. Censat i on , expenses. All members of the Historical Cemi ssi on shall serve without compensation. Sec. 2 -97. Staff - Director of Commission responsible for correspondence, docket, minutes, records, files, etc. Subject to the direction of the Historical Commission and its chairperson, the City Manager's designated person shall conduct all corres ondence of the Commission, send out all notices required, attend all meetings and gearings of the Commission, keep the docket and minutes of the Commission's proceedings, compile all required records, and maintain the necessary files and indexes of the Commission. Sec. 2 -98. City Attorney and Other City Employees. (a) The services of the City Attorney shall be available to the Historical Commission, Sec. 2 -99. Sunset (a) The Historical Commission shall sunset on December 31, 2 Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Stop Sign Requests" a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the eci f i cs of the report . c. Mayor Bastian asked if "anyone wished tQ/ speak before the Council regarding this matter. The - following we heard: Bill Daley, 907 Lakewood Court - n favor of stop signs Read letter from Diane &'Ric-K* Sherwood, 885 Schaller Drive - In favor Scott Samuelson, 2420 Hillw ,Drive In favor, also suggested "Curve" and or "Children at Play" signs. Brian Fitzgerald, 870 La wood 6r-ive In favor Debbie Daley, 907 Lake od Court - \In favor t d. Counci1member Rossbach oved to approve he requests for stop signs at Hill wood Drive and Arnie Street and at '.5ghal l er Drive and Lakewood Court. Seconded by Mayor,-6'astian Ayes =\a11 5 -13 -96 16 Attachment 4 MAPLEWOOD AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Peter 1Boulay, President Telephone: 490 -32511 11100 East County Road C, Maplewood, MN 55109 TO: Mayor Cardinal and City Council FROM: Robert Overby, MARS Member DATE: May 18, 2000 SUBJECT: HISTORIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN Tn trodueti on I have been asked by City staff to provide some reasons why the City Council should adopt the proposed Historic Resources Management Plan. The Maplewood Area Historical Society ( "Society ") agreed I should prepare this letter and represent them at the City Council meeting. Background In December of 1999, the Society was asked by City staff to prepare a draft historic preservation plan. I wrote the draft plan, discussed it with other Society members, and gave it to City staff in early January, 2000. The draft plan was first discussed by the Planning Commission on February 7, 2000. I and other Society members were present to help explain the purpose of the plan and to answer questions. The Planning Commission asked City staff to simplify and shorten the plan. The revised draft plan was again discussed by the Planning Commission on March 6` They had some more questions and concerns, so the plan was brought back a third time on April 3 At that meeting, some minor changes to the plan were made and the Planning Commission voted to forward the draft plan to the City Council and recommended that it be approved. Discussion: The March 28, 2000 memorandum on the draft plan from Associate Planner Ken Roberts included a copy of Ordinance No. 755 (adopted 5 -13- 1996), which established a Historical Advisory Commission for the City of Maplewood. Section 2.88 of that ordinance contains a statement of public policy and purpose which is a very good description of why the City of Maplewood needs a Historic Resources Management Plan: "It is hereby declared by the City Council that it is the public policy of the City to engage in a comprehensive program of historic preservation and to promote the use and conservation of historic properties for the education, inspiration, pleasure, and enrichment of the citizens of the Maplewood area." Since the creation of the Historic Advisory Commission in 1996, Commission members have: 1. helped establish the non - profit Maplewood Area Historical Society; 2. worked with the Society to discover and collect historical materials; 3. worked with the Society to publish historical information about Maplewood; 4. worked with the Society to prepare a list of historic Maplewood properties; 5. worked with the Society and the City to preserve the historic Bruentrup Farm; and 6. worked with the Society to review and approve the draft Historic Resources plan. 17 m:. .;: . � 7 ,• : r P s ..: • H �T r . �r. �'f • JUN, 19. 2000 IAIPM DAKOTA COUNTY PHYS DEV ADMIN N0. 1407 P. 2 Attachment .5 L�•l�C� 9 ` �EM�� R� AA M��►�.+�U E �r Vjri � To: Melinda Coleman and K.cn Roberts JUN g 2000 Prorw Robert t "ft, ll&plewood Am Historical Society D ate: June 19, 2000 t gap AW RE: Addendum to MVJAIter Regarding the Historic Resources Mara ant Plan 3 :y . You requested that.I ve information on the Poll • . .. _ . � id if ow3Il� i�lleb' tI0 �. �:.: Y r why wem a Historical Advisory Commission and Historical Society anted in 19967 As far as I can determine, the vie three main reasons why the RAC was foaled. - One reason Wu to serve as the City's icially appointed ,grw p re r+di W historial t . _ - TWO,. as part of the historical inq uiries made for the City's 40 Anni vernly its 1997. Tam, re- establishing ft Maplewood Am EUgoric2l Society. The Historical Advisory Commission sho uld be the official forum of the City for historic preservation in general, and specifically for discussing and implemenfutg the goals and policies of the Historic Resources 11anagement Plait This activity should be done in coordination with tho Planrbg com missiczi, Llesign Review Board(?), and city Council, The Histories Society was established to serve as the non-profit community group tit would rally People to the cause of historic preservation In M plewood, conduct histadcal ras h, Wd provide support and advice to the Histon'cal Advisory Commissi attd City Council. The Historical Society supports historic preservatio in Maplewood, but cannot qmk ibr the City. 2, Does the Historical Society e xpect the City to budget and spend additional staff time and other resources in order to support the Historical Advisory Commission? curre,ndy, each year the City provides the Historical Advisory Commission with $2,000 for operating expenses. The City also has provided a part -time person to act as liaison botween the Commission and the City. If the City council decides that it wants the Historical Advise Commission to 1 a more Advisory pay aettve role in the review of planning and development proposals in Maplewood, then it Sams le ftt some city staff tlmc nm ght be budgeted to work with the commission (as is done with other City commissions). We do not know how much staff time would be needed, nor the cstimnated cost. 3. Is a Historical imnission required for the city of Maplewood to become a "Certified Local aovernmeW, an what am the benefits of the CLO designation? The Aertificd Local Government desipation is applied b the ll�mmota Historical Society .. Y ety �o Municipal which demote the capacity t o usiderCake historic Preservation p� One fa=r is wheth= _.*e community has an adopted plan for historic poservatiom A second factor is whether the community has a Historic Proscrvadon Commission (this is -md). 'Th,e benefit to Maptewo of becoming a Cried Local Government is that the city would be eligible to apply for a since of grant funding that is only available to the 30 CLG communities in 1Vlinnesa a. Each yam, about 6 tents are awarded, on such figs as doing an historic resources inventory, or setting rip the local plaout and design review process. Thcsc are other grant fttg sources available to Maplewood which do not require the CLG designation, W Attachment 6 HISTORIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN (CITY STAFFS PROPOSAL -MARCH 31, 2000) INTRODUCTION At the time of this comprehensive plan update, Maplewood had grown through 43 years since its incorporation in 1957. Before that, the Township of New Canada had endured for 99 years since its founding in 1858. Historic properties and structures contribute to our city by providing information about our past. They provide evidence of the way Maplewood was settled and the people's contributions made to our society. They also are a reflection of the values that formed this city. Preserving historic sites and resources benefits the city, both economically and socially. Historic preservation goes beyond the primary concern of understanding the significance of historic and cultural resources. It also focuses on integrating historic preservation into the broader planning and decision- making arena, so it can be relevant to social and economic concerns. The Maplewood Comprehensive Plan will, among other things: - guide future growth and development in an orderly manner; - define the proper functional relationships between different types of land uses; - help to coordinate public and private sector decisions; - establish a framework to guide and involve citizen participation in City government; and - provide for a sense of community and neighborhood identity. All of the above - listed purposes of the City comprehensive plan can be informed by and supported by an effective historic resources plan, and by citizens and decision - makers who use the guidance of this plan chapter to preserve historic, cultural, and archeological resources In Maplewood. The Historic Resources Management Plan also is connected to many of the goals of the City of Maplewood, as described elsewhere in this comprehensive plan (pages 7,8). In its efforts to preserve and protect historic resources in Maplewood, the City will make decisions to plan and implement programs consistent with those goals and policies, and with the goals and policies in this plan chapter for historic resources. PURPOSE The Historic Resources Management Plan is to support and interrelate with all elements, goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the Historic Resources Management Plan is to: 1. Guide the city in a comprehensive program of historic preservation and historic resource management. 2. Describe the existing historic resources and historic preservation activities in Maplewood. 3. Evaluate the historic preservation and historic resource needs of Maplewood's residents and to set standards for measuring the meeting of those needs. W 4. Promote the use and conservation of historic properties in Maplewood for the education, inspiration, pleasure and enrichment of area citizens. 5. Plan for adequate support and understanding of the historic resources in Maplewood. 6. Designate the goals, policies and actions that Maplewood will use to help preserve the historic resources in the city. DISCUSSION, CHALLENGES AND ISSUES Although the area known as Maplewood has had European settlement for more than 100 years, Kittle has been done at the city level about the historic resources in the city. The development of a historic preservation program will be challenging for a variety of reasons. These include: • The aging of our citizens who have knowledge of historic places. • The limits in public funding support for historic preservation programs. • The development or redevelopment of sites that might have historic resources. • Private ownership of properties that have historic resources. However, there are opportunities available. Maplewood could build on these opportunities to develop a program to help preserve the city's heritage. These opportunities include: • Having completed a preliminary inventory of historic properties in Maplewood. • The existence of preservation- oriented organizations with members that have historical knowledge or preservation expertise. • The existence of county, state and federal agencies that have knowledge of historic resources and programs. The Metropolitan Council's "Local Planning Handbook" has several suggested guidelines for a historic preservation plan element. They include standards about the establishment of Heritage Preservation Commissions and the practices to follow when doing work on historic properties. Specifically, the Local Planning Handbook says persons should follow the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. These include the following: • Standards for Preservation Planning 1. Preservation Planning Establishes Historic Contexts A. Decisions about historic properties are most reliably made when the relationship of individual properties to other similar properties is understood. Information about historic properties which represent aspects of history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture must be collected.-and organized to define these relationships. This organizational framework is called a historic context The historic context organizes information based on a cultural theme and its geographical and chronological limits. Contexts describe the significant broad patterns of development in an area that may 2 20 be represented by historic properties. The development of historic contexts is the foundation for decisions about identification, evaluation, registration, and treatment of historic properties. B. "Develop goals, policies and priorities for the identification, registration, and treatment of historic properties." This task should be pursued by the City, the HPC, and the MAHS, after the City Council adopts this plan. • Guidelines and Activities for a Preservation Planning Program These guidelines are to include a development of Historic Contexts. That is, a comprehensive summary of Maplewood's history can be created by developing a set of historic contexts that will include all significant historic and cultural properties (and sites) in the city. Maplewood should coordinate any efforts about this through the State Historic Preservation Office since it generally has the most complete information and is usually in the best position to coordinate the use and development of historic contexts. Once the city and the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) or the Maplewood Area Historical Society (MAHS) have finished the inventory of Heritage Resources, they should be organized into historic contexts. This organization should be based on a cultural theme, geography and chronology. The designation of Maplewood Heritage Landmarks should be given those historically or culturally significant objects, structures, buildings, sites and districts in the city. To be designated a heritage landmark, a property must meet specific criteria for determining historical significance. Besides local registration, certain properties may qualify for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. Properties on the National Register are recognized for their historical significance. The creation of a register of significant historical properties is a critical step in planning historic preservation. Conflicts between Maplewood's requirements and standards for historic preservation and those of the state or federal government shall be decided by the city council. Maplewood is eligible to apply to the State Historical Preservation Office to be a Certified Local Government (CLG) if the city has a Heritage Preservation Commission. If the city does become a certified local government, then Maplewood may participate in the CLG preservation partnership that the National Historic Preservation Act established. Federal funding is available through a grants -in- aid - program to finance activities such as the local inventory of historic resources, historic preservation planning and education. HISTORIC PRESERVATION GOALS The following are the city's overall historic preservation goals: 1. Maplewood supports the protection of the city's heritage by preserving, protecting, conserving, and wisely using the significant historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological objects, structures, buildings, sites, resources and districts in the City. 21 2. Maplewood encourages community identity and civic pride by preserving and protecting historic properties, structures, sites and resources in Maplewood. 3. Maplewood will develop a historic preservation program and will integrate the program with other planning programs in the City. 4. Maplewood will establish a comprehensive framework for all decisions and actions related to historic preservation. 5. Maplewood will encourage broad citizen participation in historic preservation activities, in order to obtain the knowledge, insights, and support of City residents. HISTORIC PRESERVATION POLICIES The following are the city's historic preservation policies: 1. The Maplewood Area Historical Society will advise, assist and make recommendations to the City Council and City staff about historic preservation and resource matters. 2. Maplewood will implement the historic preservation goals and policies by linking and integrating them with other City programs and activities, including but not limited to planning, zoning, code enforcement, housing, economic development, and public works. 3. Maplewood will work with county, state and federal agencies and other organizations, including the State Historic Preservation Office of the Minnesota Historical Society, when implementing this plan. 4. Maplewood will work with the Maplewood Area Historical Society to identify, document, and evaluate the historical significance of objects, structures, buildings, sites, resources and districts in Maplewood, and consider their preservation potential. 5. Maplewood will protect, preserve, and enhance the significant heritage resources in the city by designating them as Maplewood Heritage Landmarks, and where appropriate, by nominating them to the National Register of Historic Places. 6. Maplewood will have the Maplewood Area Historical Society, with assistance from City staff, prepare and maintain the Maplewood Heritage Resources Inventory. 7. In cooperation with City staff and the Maplewood Planning Commission, the Maplewood Area Historical Society may comment on all development proposals that would affect properties on the historic properties list. 8. Maplewood may issue permits or approve development plans that include conditions for historic preservation, based upon the recommendations of the Maplewood Historical Commission. 9. Maplewood supports research, community awareness and public education on the value and importance of preservation, protection, and the use of heritage resources in the City. 4 22 10. Maplewood encourages the establishment of an accessible location where historic documents and artifacts can. be stored and protected. 11. Maplewood supports those who seek outside funding to support further historic preservation efforts. 12. Maplewood should make an effort to incorporate local history into present development by using historic names for streets, parks and geographical features. P Aco m p p l a nip reser -3.00 R 23 HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACTION PLAN Action Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Adopt & implement a historic Dir of CD, CC Ongoing None PC, MARS, HPC resource management plan. Advise, assist and make MAHS Ongoing None PC, CC, HPC recommendations about historic preservation and resource matters Identify, document, evaluate MAHS Ongoing None PC, CC, HPC and maintain an inventory of historically significant objects, structures, buildings, sites, resources and districts in Maplewood. Complete a preservation MAHS Ongoing None PC, CC, HPC planning report before the City Council designates a property as a Maplewood Heritage Landmark. Issue a finding of significance MAHS Ongoing None PC, CC, HPC for individual objects, structures, buildings, sites, resources and districts to determine whether they are eligible for designation as Maplewood Heritage Landmarks. Designate significant historic MAHS Ongoing None PC, CC, HPC or cultural properties or resources as Maplewood Heritage Landmarks, and nominate appropriate properties or resources for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Place properties designated as City Staff Ongoing None Land Use Plan Maplewood Heritage Landmarks on the official Maplewood Zoning Map. Use and follow the Secretary of MAHS Ongoing None HPC the Interior's standards and guidelines when advising the owners of historic properties about maintenance and restoration work. 24 Action Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Use and follow the Secretary of City Staff, CDRB Ongoing None MARS, CC the Interior's standards and guidelines for design review decisions about Heritage Landmarks and Historically Significant Structures and for archeology and historic preservation. Review city ordinance and amend City Staff, CC Ongoing None MARS, PC them as may be needed to reflect the goals and policies for historic preservation. Establish a program of local City Staff, MAHS Ongoing None CC historical markers and plaques that identifies and informs the public about historic sites. Provide information and education City Staff, MAHS Ongoing None CC about historic preservation and about properties, sites or resources that are historically or culturally significant to property owners and to the general public. Participate in education and MAHS Ongoing None City Staff communication programs to increase the visibility and understanding of the city's historic resources. Advise schools and teachers in MAHS Ongoing None City Staff the development of curricula and teaching aids about history and historic preservation in Maplewood. Incorporate local history into City Staff, CC Ongoing None PC present development by using historic names for streets, parks and geographical features. Comment on all development MAHS Ongoing None PC, City Staff proposals that would affect properties on the historic properties list. Review all applications or permits MAHS Ongoing None City Staff for the demolition, moving, or remodeling of Heritage Landmarks or Historically Significant Structures in Maplewood to determine the possible impacts on significant heritage resources. 25 Action Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Work with and encourage City Staff, MAHS Ongoing None property owners to help preserve the heritage resource value and historical integrity of significant historical or cultural resources. Encourage property owners to City Staff Ongoing None MARS meet historic preservation standards and guidelines when working on historic properties. Work with the Maplewood Area City Staff, CC 2001 None H PC Historical Society to apply to the State Historical Preservation Office for certification as a Certified Local Government (CLG). Seek outside funding sources and City Staff, CC, Ongoing None participate where feasible on MAHS historic preservation projects. Work with county, state and City Staff, CC Ongoing None MAHS federal agencies and other organizations when implementing this plan (including the State Historic Preservation Office of the Minnesota Historical Society). p:compplan /compchart 26 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, APRIL 3, 2000 VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Historic Resources Management Plan Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Trippler referred to his request, at the previous meeting, to have some consistency provided when referring to "Maplewood shall" or "the city shall" in the discussion about the historic preservation policies, action plan and goals. He said that the chair had asked that it be one or the other and this does not seem to be reflected in this submittal. Mr. Roberts replied that his focus was more on what the policies and actions were saying and who was going to do the actions. Mr. Trippler recommended that this wording be changed. As an example, he referred to #2 on page 21. Mr. Trippler asked to whom the 'historical society would be making recommendations, advising, and assisting. Mr. Roberts said it could be the city, city council, planning commission, or the public. Commissioner Trippler also asked what the result of designating significant historic properties ( #6 on page 21) would be. Mr. Roberts did not have the answer to this question. Then Mr. Trippler questioned how reviewing demolition, moving and remodeling applications and permits ( #16 on page 22) would fit into the current process for review and approval. He felt it was necessary to have a specific time period given, if this needed to be a requirement. Mr. Roberts thought this would have to come in an ordinance adopted by the city council. He pointed out that these requirements were more general and the specifics would be covered by an ordinance. Chairperson Fischer said #16 on page 22 was a good example of a concern she expressed at the last meeting about not having the action plan incorporated in the same format as the rest of the comprehensive plan. Ken Roberts answered that he wanted to get the plan, especially the policies and action plan, to a point where the historical society representatives and the planning commission agreed. Then he would put the results in a table format. Commissioner Thompson asked if #8 on page 9 should read that the committee will review "all applications or permits . . ." or just historically significant applications. Mr. Roberts said this statement was in the first draft and was more for a comparison. Then Mr. Thompson referred to #7 on page 20. He was concerned, but thought it might be a little more acceptable, because this item stated that the historical society may comment on a l development proposals on the historic list. Mr. Thompson mentioned page 21 where it states the city will periodically review and update the preservation action plan. He asked if it would be possible to be more specific or would the ordinance cover this. Commissioner Thompson was in favor of the sunset provision in the present ordinance. Mr. Roberts wasn't sure if a sunset provision could be put in a chapter of the comprehensive plan. He thought a definite time period for review could be specified. Commissioner Pearson asked who, in the event of a dispute, would reign the body and powers as outlined in the ordinance (Sec. 2 -89 and 2 -94) or the standards and guidelines of the Secretary of the Interior. Mr. Roberts thought it might be the ordinance that would prevail. Mr. Pearson asked for the city attorney's opinion in this regard. Commissioner Rossbach questioned whether it would be the historical society or historical commission that would be formed by these actions. Because the historical commission will sunset at the end of this year, Mr. Roberts said the city council will have to decide whether the commission should be continued. If the council does not renew this commission, the only Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 04 -03 -2000 advisory body in the city would be the historical society. Chairperson Fischer thought the plan should include an appeals process. Mr. Roberts explained the Maplewood Historical Society and the Maplewood Historical Advisory Commission (referred to in the plan text as the Historical Commission). Robert Overby, of 1829 Furness Street in Maplewood, felt the draft presented at this meeting "cleans up" most of the issues or concerns. He suggested that it would be more appropriate to have the review of applications and permits done by the Historical Preservation (or Historical Advisory) Commission ( #16 on page 22). The Historical Society could advise the commission. Mr. Overby felt that the statement prohibiting or regulating the demolition of property on the National Register (page 19) was misleading. Because a property is listed on the register, which takes action by the state historical society, it doesn't prevent someone from tearing down or modifying it. He recommended putting language in the ordinance that would connect back to how the city would want to protect those properties. Mr. Overby thought this sentence should be eliminated. Commissioner Trippler asked, if the commission was established and functioning in accordance with this plan, would it be possible for someone to acquire property without knowing it was on the register. Mr. Overby replied that this information would need to be recorded on the property deed. Pete Boulay, 1100 County Road C East, said it is very difficult to get a building or property on the National Register. He felt it would be hard to buy a property and not know it was on the register since a plaque is affixed to it. He thought that legally a realtor needed to tell a buyer about this. Mr. Overby pointed out that the Secretary of the Interior's guidelines were meant to be advisory. Commissioner Thompson asked what would happen if a property at 1915 Desoto North were to be demolished with this ordinance in effect. Mr. Overby assumed the property owner would apply for a demolition permit. If the city was aware that this was on the list in the historic plan or had some historic significance, staff would hopefully contact the historical commission. Mr. Overby did not know if it would be possible to stop the demolition, but the state historical society could be contacted to evaluate the site. Mr. Boulay said there would be a list with the condition of all the properties. He said the property on DeSoto was checked in 1982 by Ramsey County and was judged to be in poor condition. There would be a recommendation from the county on a course of action. Mr. Boulay felt ideally the commission would be informed of the permit request. They would contact the property owner and at least take a photographic record of the property. Mr. Overby commented that the historical advisory commission, in most city ordinances, is designated as the official review body. The historical society is advisory to this commission or a city group that works on research and community education. Mr. Overby suggested putting in a provision for resolving conflicts after #16 on page 22. Mr. Boulay gave some background information on the Maplewood Historical Commission and Historical Society. He said it was up to the city to decide whether they wished to relate to the commission or the society. Commissioner Thompson questioned if it would be unusual to have a nonprofit society, such as the historical society, as an advisory board. Mr. Overby said the society is more of a civic organization. He saw the commission as a body that reports to the planning commission and the city council. Mr. Overby said if Maplewood has a historical preservation - commission, they can choose to become a certified local government. Having a historic commission, instead of just a society, gives the city an opportunity to apply for federal funding. Mr. Overby said they have asked the state about the type of funding available and how other cities have used it, but Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 04 -03 -2000 have not received a reply. Commissioner Rossbach said he had "changed his opinion to some degree" since the last meeting. After a recent drive in the Gladstone area, he felt that there might be some interest in retaining some of these buildings, i.e. the Gladstone fire station, Mike's LP, Richard's Market. He also suggested that new buildings might be encouraged to have a design that would "fit in." Mr. Rossbach personally thought " we are giving these people way too much of a hard time for wanting to help out the city." He advocated a historic preservation commission where the members would be appointed by the city council and function in the same manner as the other existing Maplewood commissions. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend the continuation of the Historic Preservation Commission. Commissioner Thompson seconded. Commissioner Pearson said he would like to support the motion but he questioned "which of these applications, if they come into conflict, is going to be superior between the comprehensive plan and these other." He preferred an answer from the city attorney in this regard. Commissioner Rossbach replied that he was going to make another motion related to the historic resources management plan and request this information. Ayes all The motion passed. Commissioner Rossbach recommended adoption of city staff's proposal for the historic resources management plan. Before this is presented to the city council, the following changes shall be made: 1) all references to the city shall be consistent throughout the plan, 2) an item that will set out a mechanism to resolve conflicts shall be added in the guidelines, activities section or in the historic preservation action plan, 3) the action plan shall be put into the same format as other action plans in the current comprehensive plan, 3) the city attorney's opinion will be requested on whether the city's guidelines or the Secretary of the Interior's standards and guidelines (referred to in the historical preservation action plan) would take precedent in an area of conflict, 4) "As such, any change or demolition of a property on the National Register may be prohibited or strictly regulated" will be eliminated in the third paragraph under guidelines and activities and 5) staff will ensure that there is consistency in the plan when referring to the commission or the society. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes all The motion passed. Mr. Overby referred to Commissioner's Rossbach's comments about Frost Avenue in the Gladstone area. He said the history of Maplewood that was compiled for the city's 40th anniversary "opened his eyes to what use to be" and he thought it was a good insight into why a historic landmark program should be considered. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, MARCH 6, 2000 VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Historic Resources Management Plan Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts revised the draft plan in order to put it in a format more consistent with the style and layout of the city's current comprehensive plan. He . also added a , couple of headings, including a purpose section and a section titled "Discussion, Challenges and Issues." Mr. Roberts said the next step was for the commission to decide which plan they liked better and if they have further changes. Mr. Robert Overby, a member of the Maplewood Area Historical Society (MARS), was present to answer the commissioners' questions. Commissioner Trippler said that, under the Historic Preservation Goals on the staff's draft report, it sometimes says that Maplewood does something and sometimes it says the city does something. He wanted to know if it was staff's intent that wherever it says "Maplewood will..." or "Maplewood shall... ", that they were referring to the council. Mr. Roberts said the word "Maplewood" did not necessarily refer only to the city council it could mean anybody within the city. He said part of the reason for using the words interchangeably was to avoid redundancy. Chairperson Fischer interjected to say that One of the directions they had given to staff was to reformat this plan so that it was the same as the comprehensive plan. She felt that wherever the plan refers to the city, or Maplewood, etc., one word should be used for consistency throughout the plan. Commissioner Trippler said that it seemed to him there needs to be some consistency so that it's clear, not only to the reader . but to the planning commission and to the council, what their responsibilities are and what is just a general statement about what people should, could or will do. Chairperson Fischer said that in other plans there was a chart implementation showing action, responsibility, timing, funding, and coordinate with. She said that in the land use part nowhere in the verbiage does it show the Planning Commission; in the housing part nowhere do you see the Housing Redevelopment Authority, etc. Commissioner Trippler said he liked the staff's rendition better than the draft plan because there were portions in the draft plan that were ambiguous. He said it seemed there were several areas that could potentially cause too long a delay from the time that someone comes in and requests an action and the time that the council gets it to conclude the action. Commissioner Thompson wanted to. know what a property designated as a Maplewood Heritage Landmark would be zoned as. Staff said the intent was.-to _ have a...._pla.ce to..vis.ualLy.__refe.rence this property, besides having the list which is in the report. Staff said when someone checked the zoning on the property they would see that the city has designated the property as a historical property, and then the question would be what does that mean and what can or can't we do. Staff said that this would be some of the policies and actions that the commission should look at. Commissioner Mueller said that as he read the report it sounded like the preservation commission was going to be able to dictate to the planning commission as well as to city council what they should, can or can't do with the items that are noted as heritage landmarks. Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 03 -06 -00 Staff said their recollection was that in order to have a property designated .as a Maplewood Heritage Landmark or on the National Register it would have to be approved by the city council. Mr. Overby had a couple of comments regarding the uncertainty about the Historical Advisory Commission. He said they didn't think to add Ordinance No. 755 that the city council had passed back in 1996. He read parts of two sections of the ordinance which he thought would help clarify the role of the commission and the questions about the authority of same, and who designates what, and how it affects property owners. .Mr. Overby said that Char Wasiluk had a list of items that explain why the Historical Preservation Commission should be continued even though it is scheduled to sunset at the end of this year. Char Wasiluk, of 1740 Frank Street, said that as a historical commission they can apply to be a certified local government and then they can apply for federal grants but that this cannot be done without an official commission. The citizen advisory panel that is appointed by the council has major responsibilities for identifying, registering, protecting and enhancing the heritage resources in Maplewood and for establishing a broad planning direction for the city's preservation program. Chairperson Fischer asked Ms. Wasiluk if this body would be generally operating within the guidelines of the ordinance that was just read or would there be additional powers or duties that might be involved. Ms. Wasiluk said she envisioned this being an advisory board. Mr. Overby said that if the city adopts the Historic Preservation Plan chapter then that could provide guidance to the ordinance that is on the books and then if the city council wants to amend the ordinance they could use the plan chapter to figure out how they might change it or add to it. Commissioner Mueller said he wished he could get rid of the current section on the policies and replace it with the information that the applicant had. Mr. Overby thought that city staff had done a good job in revising the draft plan. Mr. Overby said there were a few elements in the first draft that spoke to the role of the Historic Preservation Commission that were omitted in the current draft. He said that there was a lot more detail in the first draft than was probably needed but that there were some pieces he felt should be reinserted because they spoke to the planning process. Chairperson Fischer said that normally if a homeowner wanted to add a second story on to their home they would need a building permit only. She asked that if the house had some historic significance would the homeowner have additional hoops they had to jump through rather than just obtaining a building permit. Mr. Overby said it would be helpful to have some information sheets which would explain to homeowners which properties in the neighborhood are part of what gives it the historic character. He also said that, depending upon the type of architecture or design of the house, sometimes you can add additions that blend in with the rest of the design. Chairperson Fischer asked how historically accurate they can be if there have been changes in the structure over the years, the year it was built, the year it was changed and so on. Mr. Overby brought up the Bruentrup house and how there were new aluminum combination windows and yet a lot of the structure was similar to what it looked like in 1912 when it was built. He said the basement windows in the house were not saved and that Andersen Windows was able to design windows that would fit. Mr. Overby said that the Commission would provide homeowners with guidance and if someone didn't have the financial resources to do it the way they might like that loans or grants might become an option. Chairperson Fischer asked about Pete Boulay's statement from a previous meeting that the review process might just be the opportunity to get pictures because the property may be Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 03 -06 -00 leveled or structurally altered because it was no longer suitable for today's owner's needs. Mr. Overby said that in most cases the city wouldn't step in and say you can't do anything and in those situations there are people at the State Historical Society that can be called in and assess what the situation is. If the city is doing a project like a new bike or walking trail someplace and they knew it was going to go through an old part of town that might have some sensitive resources, typically a consultant would be called in to check out the areas that might have those resources to make sure that either they aren't there or if they are, they become inventoried and cataloged and maybe taken off the site before the project goes through. Commissioner Rossbach said that the current list they have is the Additional Sites of Major Significance. He wanted to know what did something have to do to get on that list. Mr. Overby said Pete Boulay made up the list. He said that age was a factor and another factor was a house or business that displayed a certain architectural design or character. Commissioner Rossbach said he wasn't in favor of telling homeowners what they can and can't do to their house unless their house is extremely special. He also said he didn't want the city to set something up that would block the city from redeveloping or upgrading. Chairperson Fischer asked if the list Commissioner Rossbach referred to is complete. Mr. Overby said they were not through doing the list or inventory yet. He said part of the inventory is to engage the citizens in the different neighborhoods and see what they remember and can educate us about. Ms. Wasiluk said she didn't think that the list means that they want every one of the things kept as they are. Ms. Wasiluk said it was Pete Boulay's list of sites of major significance and it doesn't say anything more than that. Ms. Wasiluk said that Carol Peterson and she interviewed the two women that were living at the Husnick Farm before it was torn down and that they gave them a lot of information and pictures of the old street car that went by their place. She felt that it wasn't necessary to keep every one of these things on the list if there was historical information on what was there. Mr. Overby said that when properties are put on the National Register of Historic Places it is with the intent that they substantially remain in the design and condition that they are in, such as, the Ramsey County Poor Farm Barn which would face the toughest controls on design or modification. If a property is not on that list they don't receive the same scrutiny and even if they are on the list it doesn't mean they are legally protected from being torn down. Commissioner Pearson asked what kind of funding they were typically expecting to get once this was all approved and in place. Mr. Overby said it was not just a question of financial resources but having the people power to work on it. He said it depends on how many volunteers in the city are willing to come forth and help them with the work. They have about 20 active members in their society and a number of them are fairly engaged in the farm preservation project but would welcome other volunteers to work on this. Commissioner Pearson said he had a concern that when they start talking about getting federal money that it always comes with federal controls. He has a concern that what starts-out--as a fine local planning agenda all of a sudden loses control and is not controlled by local people, local councils or local desires but by federal statutes. Mr. Overby said that these standards could be softened up until the design review board or other city group determined that it makes sense to follow the standards. Chairperson Fischer asked if once we had in place the designation of what properties are historically significant would they have to look at everything else that came through or would they only review what was pertinent to the site that was designated. Staff said that under Historic Preservation Policies in the staff report, Item 10, it says, "In cooperation with city staff Planning Commission -4- Minutes of 03 -06 -00 and the Maplewood Planning Commission , the Heritage Preservation Commission may comment on all development proposals that would affect properties on the historic properties list." Mr. Overby said that would be fine as worded. Commissioner Mueller asked that if his house became designated, what's in it for him. Mr. Overby said his house could be put on a walking tour and someone might stop and take a picture of it. He said this was about "community identity and preserving a resource." Commissioner Mueller asked what would happen if he added a second story to his ranch home. Mr. Overby said that if you didn't want your property nominated for the National Register of Historic Places, it wouldn't have to be. Commissioner Mueller asked if criteria was drafted that could be used to identify historic sites. Mr Overby said that those are things that go back to historic contexts and the landmark designation process and they don't have it. He said they could get that from the State Historical Society. Mr. Mueller thought it was necessary to establish standards for both the Register and for historic sites. Mr. Overby suggested starting with a basic inventory and educating the residents by keeping the historic preservation commission and have the city staff work with the society and commission to do an inventory and establish criteria. He felt it was important to keep an explanation of historic context and what it means for Maplewood in the planning guidelines. Commissioner Rossbach agreed with Ms. Wasiluk that too much is probably "being read into this." He said it is a good thing for the city to have people that are interested and to have a history. Mr. Rossbach said the commission "should quit trying to be the historical society and figuring out how they should go about things" and just determine what the planning commission wants to do at this point. He thought the concept of what the historical - commission wanted to do "was a good one" and ultimately it would work itself out. Mr. Roberts thought the commission should first decide if they feel a historic resources management plan should be in the comprehensive plan. If they think so, then how much and in what format. Commissioner Trippler questioned if the WPA dam on Keller Creek was the structure north of the Gateway Trail that controls the flow of water into Lake Phalen. He said it had been totally redone three or four years ago. Mr. Roberts took No. 4, under Historic Preservation Goals on page 15, to mean "putting together a comprehensive historic resources management plan to guide the decisions and actions of the city." He read it as a goal to do a whole plan. Mr. Overby thought it would be clearer to say that "Maplewood will use the historic preservation plan chapter as the framework for decisions and actions related to historic preservation." Commissioner Trippler said he was supportive of having a historical commission and "liked the things that staff put together on page 14 through page 18." He felt there should be some consistency in referencing what the city is going to do versus what the historical commission will do. Commissioner Thompson asked if there was a vehicle to avoid surprises where someone owned a piece of property that could possibly have restrictions and they wouldn't know it. Mr. Overby suggested that something might be recorded with the property deed that was informative but not necessarily binding. He said you typically see this on a map of historic properties. Mr. Trippler mentioned a deed restriction which is an actual statement that is put on the property deed stating any restrictions to the property. He also said there are also deed notifications which go along with the deed but are not recorded on it. Planning Commission -5- M i n utes of 03 -06 -00 Chairperson Fischer questioned the listing for the 3M Building #1 on page 13. She also felt that some of the wording now presented did not adequately reflect the thoughts from the last commission meeting. Other commissioners agreed with her. Commissioner Pearson said some of the terminology could be made more "benign and less dictatorial." Mr. Overby assured the commission that they were not talking about taking of any property. Commissioner Mueller suggested that a distinction be made between a policy and a procedure, particularly on page 16. Ms. Fischer thought it was a matter of rearranging the content into a format that followed the remainder of the comprehensive plan. Commissioner Frost felt that staff had enough direction, from the all the discussion that had been presented, to rewrite parts of the chapter and then submit it to the city council. Commissioner Rossbach wanted to see this item again before a recommendation was made to the council. He felt it was necessary to include the city's projected monetary cost. Mr. Overby said the city gives the historic preservation commission, and indirectly the historical society, $2000 per year. Most of their time has been spent on the Bruentrup farm in the last year but they normally try to maintain a balance between getting histories of older residences and identifying resources. There was a consensus of the commission that this should be a part of the comprehensive plan. Mr. Overby pointed out that the city, under the Metro Land Planning Act, is required to say something about historical preservation in the plan. He also wanted the city council to see the draft plan before they made a decision on the continuation of the historical commission. Chairperson Fischer concurred with Mr. Rossbach in that she felt the planning commission should see the plan again. Mr. Roberts asked for a "condensed version of the direction." Ms. Fischer suggested that it should cover Mr. Mueller's concerns over what is a policy and what is a procedure. She also recommended looking at verbs more carefully so they would not convey a message that was not intended. Mr. Roberts thought it would be good to make a separate set of maps that would identify the historical properties by address. Commissioner Mueller felt a criteria to identify historic places was essential. He was of the opinion that it would be most beneficial to list a limited amount of procedural issues. Mr. Roberts said that if procedures were not adequately listed, the council would question it. Commissioner Pearson thought the council might like to see a copy of the standards and guidelines from the Secretary of the Interior. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission return the Historic Resources Management Plan to staff to have it revised in accordance with some of the recommendations that were discussed by the Commission and Robert Overby. Staff should work with Mr. Overby to complete a final version which will then be presented to the city council after review by the planning commission. Commissioner Thompson seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. Commissioner Thompson thanked Ms. Wasiluk and Mr. Overby. City of Maplewood Official Sign -Up Sheet By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes. Name (first &last) - please print L V'r Y 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Address cis' 750 �h AGENDA nEM N Action by Council MEMORANDUM Date TO: City Manager Endorsed FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Modified OBJECT: Zoning Code Change - Business Commercial (BC) Dist& ected DATE: June 20, 2000 INTRODUCTION Request City staff is proposing a zoning code change about dwelling units in combination with business uses. This proposed change is in response to the city council's request from their meeting of May 8, 2000. Background On May 8, 2000, the city council approved a conditional use permit (CUP) and the design plans for Thomas Schaffhausen, of Sanas Capital Investments, to build a 5,300 square -foot office /warehouse facility at 1055 Gervais Avenue. Part of Mr. Schaffhausen's request was to keep an existing house on the property for an employee to live in. The city council approved this request and directed city staff to prepare a zoning code change to clarify and tighten the code language about residences in commercial zoning districts. DISCUSSION Section 36- 151(a)(1) of the city code now says "A dwelling unit for one family in combination with a business use " is a permitted use in the BC (business commercial) zoning district. However, there is some question about the city's intention by adopting this code. That is, did the city intend the dwelling unit to be in or connected to the business building or did the city intend for the dwelling unit to just be on the same property as the business? It is staff s interpretation that the city did not intend the code to allow an existing single family home to remain when there is new development. However, Mr. Schaffhausen and his attorney believe that one could interpret the ordinance to mean that the residence and a business use on a property are permitted as long as there is connection between the residents and the business. Staff proposes to change the code to clarify that any dwelling unit must be in the same building as the principal commercial use on the site. COMMISSION ACTION On June 19, 2000, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed code change. RECOMMENDATION Approve the code change on page two. This code change clarifies the use of dwelling units with .business uses. p :ordlbcresid.mem Attachment: 1 . Code Amendment Resolution Attachment 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE CHANGING SECTION 36 -151- (BUSINESS COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: Section 1. This section changes Sections 36- 151(a)(1) as follows (additions are underlined and the deletions are crossed out): (1) A dwelling unit for one family is aermitted tn carnbinatrort with a business use. The dwelling unit and the principal business use must be in the same structure Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on , 2000. Mayor _ Attest: City Clerk Ayes — Nays — F MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, JUNE 5 2000 V. NEW BUSINESS A. Zoning Code Change — Business Commercial (BC) Zoning District Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Rossbach compared the remodel of the Hesley office on White Bear Avenue, where an addition was "incorporated" into an existing house that made it look like one building, and the Fresh Paint building on Gervais. This building did not resemble the house in any manner. Mr. Rossbach felt the staff's recommendation would not have redevelopment "blend in more." He suggested a change that would permit a single family residence designed into a commercial building for use of an Occupant who is an employee of the business. He also thought it could be specified that the design blend with the existing building. Commissioner Trippler advocated deleting the phrase "when in sight of or structurally connected to" and insert " a dwelling unit for one'family may be included in the structure when it is an integral part of the principal building for a business use." Commissioner Frost thought this wording also was debatable and ambiguous. Mr. Roberts suggested taking out the portion of the staff proposal that said "or structurally connected to" and leave "when in sight of the principal building of a business use." Mr. Rossbach did not want to have a commercial building and an old house sitting on the same lot. Commissioner Ledvina agreed with Mr. Rossbach. Commissioner Thompson speculated about the need for this change if White Bear Avenue is updated. Mr. Rossbach clarified that he thought a structure could be used either as a commercial building or as part of a commercial building but it should be incorporated so that it Kooks like the rest of the project. Two different styles of building should not be on the same lot. Mr. Roberts confirmed that an applicant would be allowed to retain the appearance of his home and use it as an office if it met the building. code. He could also live in this home. Mr. Roberts proposed that a sentence saying "the dwelling unit may not be in a separate building from the business use" could be added. Commissioner Trippler suggested "the dwelling unit for one family may be located in the principal building of a business use. The dwelling unit and the principal business building must be located in the same structure." Commissioner Rossbach said a lot of consideration was being given to living in the structure but not about it being architecturally tied into the proposal. The board discussed various areas where an existing house could potentially have a commercial structure added in the future. They also discussed a business having an office on the second level that is converted to living space. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the ordinance changing Section 36 -151 (Business Commercial) District as follows: (1) A dwelling unit for one family when inside the principal building of a business use. The dwelling unit may not be in a separate building from the business use. There was no second. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission table this item until the next meeting to allow staff and the commission to consider it further and get better verbiage. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes all The motion passed. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, JUNE 19, 2000 VII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Zoning Code Change -- Business Commercial (BC) Zoning District Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Rossbach said he didn't like staff's proposed wording. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission approve the code change which clarifies the use of dwelling units with business uses as follows: (1) A dwelling unit for one family is permitted with a business use. The dwelling unit and the principal business must be in the same structure. Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes— Frost, Ledvina, Mueller, Pearson, Rossbach, Trippler Nay Fischer The motion passed. J AGENDA NO 1 l Action by co uncu Date Memorandum Endorsed Modified Rejected To: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager From: Paul Schlingman, Chief Building Engineeti Date: August 4, 2000 For the August 14th, 2000 Council Meeting Subject: Approval of Public Works Roof Bid INTRODUCTION: Council approved monies for the replacement of the roof at 1902 East County Rd. B. The amount of $103,000 was allocated for the 2000 budget. Staff opened bids for the replacement of the roof on July, 19th 2000. SELA roofing was the low bidder at $135,500.00. BACKGROUND: The proposed project has not been awarded to the contractor. The 2000 budget has a short fall of $32,500 below the lowest bidder. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that money be transferred from the contingency fund, in the amount of $32,500.00 to Acct. 101 -115 -000 -4730. If approved, staff recommends that council award the roof replacement project to the low bidder, SELA roofing. BID OPENINGS PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING ROOF July 19, 2000 1. Berwald Roofing $166,933 2. Centre) $180,297 3. SELA $135,500 4. Dalbec $146,360 Present at opening: Paul Schlingman /Steve Savageau RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of SELA Roofing in the amount of $135,500 is the lowest responsible bid for replacement of the public works building roof at 1902 East County Road B and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder forand on behalf of the city. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. J -/ MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Highpoint Ridge LOCATION: South of County Road D, west of Highway 61 DATE: August 1, 2000 INTRODUCTION Project Description Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified Dejected Mr. Frank Frattalone, representing Frattalone Excavating, is proposing to develop a residential planned unit development (PUD) called Highpoint Ridge. It would be on a 45 -acre site on the south side of County Road D, west of Highway 61. (Please see the maps starting on page 21.) Requests To build this project, Mr. Frattalone is requesting several city approvals including: 1. Changes to the comprehensive plan. These would be from R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) for the site. (See the existing and proposed land use maps on pages 22 and 23.) The developer also is proposing that the city drop the planned minor collector street that would go through the site from County Road D on the north to Highway 61 on the east. 2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) fora 222 -unit housing development. The applicant is requesting the CUP because the existing F (farm residence), R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning districts limit the uses to single dwellings in a typical or standard subdivision or to commercial uses near Highway 61 in the M -1 zone. (See the property line /zoning map on page 24.) As proposed, this project would have 28 single dwellings, 72 town houses and 122 units of apartments. Having a PUD gives the city and developer a chance to be more flexible with site design and development details than the standard zoning requirements would normally allow. The existing F and M -1 zoning districts on the site also do not allow twin homes, town houses or other multiple dwellings. 3. A preliminary plat to create the lots in the development. (See the maps on pages 25 through 28 and the enclosed project plans.) 4. Having no parking for one side of private streets and driveways. BACKGROUND- On July 10, 2000, the city council held a public hearing about this proposal. The council took testimony from the neighbors and the developer about the merits of the project at this hearing. After listening to the testimony, the council tabled action on the developer's requests to allow more time to study the project and the issues, including traffic studies submitted by the developer. Carev Addition On July 13, 1998, the city council made several approvals for the Carey Addition. These included a land use plan change and a zoning map change from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1S (single dwellings - small lot) for the north one -half of the plat and approval of the revised preliminary plat. This proposal was for the property along Carey Heights Drive, south of County Road D. The plat approval was subject to nine conditions. Mining Permit June 14, 1999: The City Council approved a revision to the mining operation conditional use permit to allow the operation to continue until December 1, 2001. DISCUSSION Land Use Plan Changes To build the proposed plat, Mr. Frattalone wants the city to change the land use plan for the site. These changes would be from R -1 (single dwelling residential), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) for the site. (See the existing and proposed land use maps on pages 22 and 23.) The city intends R -3(M) areas for a variety of housing including single dwellings, town houses or apartments of up to six units per gross acre. For R -1 areas, the city intends to have primarily single dwellings on 10,000 square -foot lots with a density of up to 4.1 units per gross acre. The city intends R -1(S) areas for small -lot (7,500 square -foot) single dwellings. For M -1 areas, the city plans for offices, clinics, day care centers, retail businesses, warehousing and light manufacturing operations. The developer also is proposing that the city drop the planned minor collector street that would go through the site to connect County Road D on the north with Highway 61 on the east. Land use plan changes do not require specific findings for approval. Any change, however, should be consistent with the city's land use goals and policies. There are several goals in the Comprehensive Plan that apply to this request. Specifically, the land use plan has eleven general land use goals. Of these, three apply to this proposal including: • Provide for orderly development. • Minimize conflicts between land uses. • Provide a wide variety of housing types. The land use plan also has several general development and residential development policies that relate to this project. They include: • Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic, social or physical impact on adjoining developments. • Whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar uses front on the same street or at borders of areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers. 2 • The city supports the improvement, replacement or redevelopment of substandard or incompatible development. • The city coordinates land use changes with the character of each neighborhood. • Include a variety of housing types for all residents ... including apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single - family housing, public - assisted housing, low- and moderate - income housing, and rental and owner- occupied housing. • Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. The housing plan also has policies about housing diversity and quality that the city should consider with this development. They are: • Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the city. These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs and nontraditional households. • The city will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and price ranges through its land use plan. This is a good site for a mix of housing styles and densities. It is on a major arterial street (Highway 61) and close to a minor collector street (Walter Street/Beam Avenue). The project should be a good neighbor to the nearby homes. There would be single dwellings near most of the existing single dwellings and the proposed town houses would be a transitional land use between single dwellings and the proposed apartments near Highway 61. The city's long -term stability of its tax base depends upon its ability to attract and keep residents of all ages. To do so, the city must insure that a diverse mix of housing styles is available in each stage of the life cycle of housing needs. One advantage of this proposal is that an area that the city once thought would be good for commercial or light industrial development would become residential. This should be beneficial to the existing nearby residential properties. Having single dwellings near the existing residences should be better neighbors than the mining operation, the commercial or a manufacturing use that the existing land use and zoning designations would allow. The proposed apartment site also would not be a great site for a commercial or retail business. It is too far away from and hidden from the main drive lanes of the highway to make it desirable for a commercial or retail business. In fact, there is an area of large trees between the frontage road and the highway that screen the apartment site from the highway. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), however, is concerned that traffic noise in the area could exceed established noise standards for residential uses. (Please see the letter from Paul Czech of MnDOT on pages 34 and 35.) In response to neighbor concerns, the developer's engineer changed the PUD by dropping the proposed Lydia Avenue connection between the proposed townhouses and the proposed single dwellings along Duluth Street. (See the site plan and preliminary plat date - stamped June 30, 2000, on pages 25 and 26.) This new design means there would not be a street connection through this development between Highway 61 and the proposed and existing single dwellings. In fact, the proposed townhouses and apartments will only have street access to the proposed Lydia Avenue and the existing frontage road. As proposed, the 222 units on the 45 -acre site means there would be an average of 5.0 units per gross acre. The proposed overall development density would be consistent with Maplewood's medium density standards and with the density standards recommended by the Metropolitan Council for housing in first -ring suburbs. That is, they want to see residential development with at least three units per gross acre. Collector Street As I noted earlier, the developer is proposing that the city drop a planned minor collector street from the land use plan. This street would have connected County Road D with Highway 61. After reviewing the area, the developer determined that this street would not have worked well with the site topography, the powerlines and pipelines near the center of the site nor with the existing and proposed street pattern. The existing land use plan shows Highway 61 as a major arterial street and Walter Street/Beam Avenue as a collector street. These streets are designed and built to carry larger volumes of traffic than the local or neighborhood streets: The proposed PUD has Lydia Avenue intersecting with Highway 61 at the southeast corner of the site. (See the proposed intersection detail on page 30.) This street layout would direct all the traffic from the townhouses and apartments in this development onto the frontage read and highway (an arterial street) and not onto the local or neighborhood streets. Conditional Use Permit The applicant has applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) for the 222 -unit housing development. They are requesting the CUP because the existing F (farm residential) and M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning designations limit the land uses to single dwellings and commercial (near the highway). As proposed, there would be a mix of single - family homes, town houses and apartments in the PUD. The developer intends to sell all the lots for the single dwellings and town houses while the apartments would be for rent. As proposed, the 222 dwelling units would be on about 44.5 acres for an overall project density of 5.0 units per acre. For a comparison, the comprehensive plan allows developments with single dwellings to have up to 4.1 units per gross acre. As such, on a 44.5 acre site, there could be up to 178 single - family homes. Preliminary Plat Density and Lot Size As proposed, the single - family lots range from 15,000 square feet to 42,481 square feet with an average lot size of about 21,200 square feet. The city requires each lot in the R -1 (single dwelling) zoning district to have at least 75 feet of frontage and have at least 10,000 square feet. All of the proposed single dwelling lots would meet or exceed the city's R -1 zoning standards. Block 3 on the north part of the site would have 36 town houses on about 12.8 acres (2.8 units per acre). These units would be on their own 28- foot -wide private cul -de -sac that would provide vehicle access to and from County Road D for these town houses. Public Utilities There are sanitary sewer and water in Carey Heights Drive, Duluth Street and County Road D to serve the proposed development. The developer will extend the water main from the north end of Carey Heights Drive and Duluth Street and from near Walter Street along the south side of County Road D into and through the site. The Saint Paul Water Utility will need to approve the water plan. 4 Trees As proposed, the contractor for Mr. Frattalone would grade almost the entire site to create the street right -of -ways, the proposed ponds and the house pads. This grading would remove about 121 large trees on the 45 -acre site. (See the tree inventory plan on page 29.) Maplewood's tree ordinance requires the developer to replace each large tree that the contractor would remove with two new trees. As such, the developer will need to plant at least 242 trees within the project site to replace the removed trees. The developer has prepared a plan for the tree planting (see the proposed plan on page 30.) There are several problems with the proposed plan, however. Tree planting in the front yards of the single - dwellings is difficult, if not impossible, to coordinate with the home construction. If the contractor puts the trees in before the homes, then they often end up in the way of the driveway or the utilities. Putting the tree in after the contractor has finished the house requires much coordination with the homeowner and their landscaping. As an alternative, staff recommends that the developer revise the proposed tree planting plan to bunch the new trees together in groups. These planting areas should be around the ponding areas and along the common property lines between residences. There also could be trees along all of the proposed trails, not just along the trail between Block One and Block Three. In addition, the revised plan must show the developer planting at least 242 trees after the site grading is done. Trails The developer's plans show three walking paths in the development. These include a path along the north side of the lots on Carey Heights Drive (under the power lines), between Lots 4 and 5, Block One (connecting Carey Heights Drive and the trail under the power lines) and a path from the north cul -de -sac (Block 3) to the west toward the city park. (These are shown on the site plan on page 25.) To prevent any confusion about ownership and property rights for trails, the county recommends that the city have the developer locate the trail in a right -of -way on the plat. The west end of the proposed trail in Block 3 however, needs to be changed or moved. As proposed, it would run into the rear part of the privately -owned property to the west of the project site. This trail should connect to the proposed east/west trail that would be under the power lines by moving the west end of the trail or by moving the trail to the east between Lots 8 and 9. For paved off - street paths, Maplewood requires 8- foot -wide bituminous paths centered in a right - of -way that is at least 10 feet wider than the trail. As such, the trailway for the trail between Lots 4 and 5, Block 1 and in Block 3 need to be at least 18 feet wide to meet this code requirement. The developer should build a two -rail split rail fence on both sides of each paved trail within this plat. The city should require the developer to install the trails and fences with the street and before final plat approval. This is to ensure that the lot buyers know that the trail is there. Drainage - Watershed District Most of the site drains to the south and east toward Highway 61 and to the pond behind LaMettry's Body Shop. A concern of several neighbors with this proposal is storm water drainage. The developer's engineer told me that by using the proposed and existing ponds as storm water detention facilities, the development will not increase the rate of storm water runoff from the site. That is, the runoff leaving the site will be at or below current levels. The Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District has been working with the developer on the proposed project plans. Mr. Frattalone or the contractor must get a permit from the watershed district before starting grading or construction. 5 Dedications Dan Solar, the Ramsey County traffic engineer, said that the applicant should dedicate ten additional feet of right -of -way along County Road D. This is because the Ramsey County right -of- way plan requires a total right -of -way width of 86 feet (43 feet on each side) for County Road D. On- Street Parking Standards The applicant is proposing street widths from 28 feet to 32 feet in the development. I had the Fire Chief and Fire Marshal review the proposed streets and their widths. According to Article 9, Section 902 of the Uniform Fire Code, all fire access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet. As such, the 28- foot -wide streets may have parking on one side of the street and the 32 -foot -wide streets may have parking on either side of the street. Traffic Study The developer had Benshoof and Associates do a traffic study of the area. This study was to address the effects the proposed development would have on tragic volumes on existing roads near the site. (Please see the study starting on page 36.) The study reviewed existing traffic conditions in the area, the amount of traffic that the proposal would create, where that traffic would go and the resultant traffic volumes. The study concluded that the proposed development would not cause negative impacts on nearby residential streets. The traffic consultant also concluded that the proposed development would not cause any significant impact to traffic flow on Highway 61. (See the letter on page 42.) As a follow -up to their first study, the developer's traffic consultants did additional traffic study work (see the memo starting on page 43). This supplement was to review access concerns with the proposal and to study the traffic impacts from various development scenarios that might occur on the property. They noted that MnDOT has reviewed the proposal and that they are satisfied with the access to the site as long as the developer completes some minor changes to the intersection. The supplemental traffic study also has a section about comparative trip generation. In this section, the traffic consultant compares the trip generation (the number of vehicle trips) from three different development scenarios along with the expected traffic from the proposed townhouses and apartments. (See the table on page 45.) The total daily traffic that each of the land uses would create shows that the proposed townhouses and apartments would generate less traffic than atwo -story office building or an auto sales and warehouse on the area that the city has planned M -1 (light manufacturing). COMMISSION ACTION On June 19, 2000, the planning commission held a public hearing about this proposal. The commission recommended that the M -1 (light manufacturing) area road remain and that the city approve the rest of the proposed PUD west of the existing M -1 area. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approve the resolution on page 46. This resolution changes the land use plan for the Highpoint Ridge residential development, south of County Road D, west of Highway 61. These changes are from R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) for the site. This resolution also drops the planned minor collector street between County Road D and Highway 61. The city is making these changes because: D 1. The development would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. 2. The town house and apartment sites in the development are proper for and consistent with the city's policies for medium and high - density residential uses. These include: a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing and proposed low density residential and commercial land uses. b. It is on an arterial street and is near a collector street. 3. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because:. a. The proposed single dwellings will separate the proposed town houses and apartments from existing homes. b. There should be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing local residential streets. The proposed street pattern keeps the town house and apartment traffic separate from the proposed and existing single dwellings. 4. Neither the city or the developer plan to build the proposed collector street between County Road D and Highway 61 because of the existing and proposed grades, the existing power lines and the existing pipelines makes it difficult to build a street in this area. B. Approve the resolution starting on page 47. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the Highpoint Ridge housing development. The city bases this approval on the findings required by code. (Refer to the resolution for the specific findings.) Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan and preliminary plat date - stamped June. 30, 2000, except where the city requires changes. The developer shall revise the grading, utility, tree planting and other project and construction plans to follow the site plan and preliminary plat dated June 30, 2000. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, trails,; tree and driveway and parking lot plans. 4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall give the city an easement for this pond and shall be responsible for getting any needed off -site pond and drainage easements. 5. The developer or contractor shall: a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. N b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Remove the debris, junk, garbage and travel trailers from the site. 6. This approval does not include the final design approval for the duplexes, townhomes or for the apartment buildings. The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping and site plans for these to the community design review board (CDRB) for approval by the CDRB. 7. The city shall not issue any building permits for construction on an outlot (per city code requirements). The developer must record a final plat to create buildable lots for any outlot in the preliminary plat before the city will issue a building permit. 8. The city council shall review this permit in one year. C. Approve the Highpoint Ridge preliminary plat (received by the city on June 30, 2000). The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat: 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Have NSP install Group V rate street lights in at least nine locations - primarily at street intersections and street curves. The exact style and location shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. d. Pay the city for the cost of traffic- control, street identification and no parking signs. e. Provide all required and necessary easements. f. Demolish or remove the existing house and garage at 1170 County Road D, and all other buildings, scrap metal, debris and junk from the site. g. Cap and seal all wells on site that the owners are not using; remove septic systems or drainfields, subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines. Within one year of the contractor installing the sanitary sewer, the owners of the existing houses on Carey Heights Drive shall connect their houses to the sanitary sewer. h. Complete all the curb and gutter on Duluth Street and on Carey Heights Drive on the south side of the site. This is to replace the temporary cul -de -sac, repair the cul -de- sac pavement and restore and sod the boulevards. I. For the trails, complete the following: (1) Construct an eight- foot -wide paved walkway and two -rail split -rail fencing between Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, between the street and the proposed east/west trail in Block 3, and along the north side of the lots in Block One (in the easement area) as shown on the plat date- stamped June 30, 2000. The developer shall extend the west end of the trail in Lot 3, Block One into the city park to connect to the existing park trail. All trails between lots shall be in a 18- foot -wide trailway or pedestrian way or in easement areas. (2) The developer shall install a two-rail split -rail fence on both sides of each trail and posts at the end of the trails to prevent motorized vehicles from using the trail. (3) The developer shall build the trails and fencing with the streets. (4) The city engineer must approve these plans. j. Install signs where the driveways for the twin homes and for the town houses intersect the public streets indicating that they are private driveways. 2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall be revised to follow the site plan and preliminary plat dated June 30, 2000, and shall include the grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail, sidewalk and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall show: (1) The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. (3) House pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large trees. (4) The proposed street and trail grades as allowed by the city engineer. (5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. On slopes steeper than 3:1, the developer shall prepare and implement a stabilization and planting plan. At a minimum, the slopes shall be protected with wood fiber blanket, be seeded with a no maintenance vegetation and be stabilized before the city approves the final plat. (6) All retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a building permit from the city. (7) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city engineer. (8) No grading beyond the plat boundary without temporary grading easements from the affected property owner(s). (9) A minimum of a 10- foot -wide, 10:1 bench below the normal water elevation (NWL) of any pond designed to be a wet pond. The depth of the pond below the NWL shall not exceed four feet. C.* The tree plan shall: (1) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or final plat approval. (2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site. (3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous trees shall be at least two and one half (2'/) inches in diameter and shall be a mix of red and white oaks, ash, lindens and sugar maples. The coniferous trees shall be at least eight (8) feet tall and shall be a mix of Austrian pine and other species. (4) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. (5) Include for city staff a detailed planting plan and material list. (6) Be revised to group the new trees together. These planting areas shall be around the ponding areas, on the steep slopes, along the common property lines between residences and along all of the proposed trails. The developer may use the tree groupings to separate the different types of residences. (7) Show the planting of at least 242 trees after the site grading is done. d. The street, trail and utility plans shall show: (1) Paved walkways and two -rail split -rail fences in a trailway or pedestrian way as shown on the proposed plans. This shall include the trail between Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, in Block 3 (as revised), between Block 1 and Block 3 (under the power lines), connecting to the existing park trail to the west of the site and on the east side of English Lane (Ridge Lane) to connect to the {proposed apartment site. The parks and recreation director shall approve their locations and design. (2) The public streets shall be a 9 -ton design with a maximum street grade of eight percent and the maximum street grade within 75 feet of all intersections at two percent. (3) All the streets, parking areas and driveways with continuous concrete curb and gutter. (4) All public street right -of -ways shall be at least 60- feet -wide. (5) The completion of the curb and gutter on the north end of Duluth Street and the existing Carey Heights Drive cul -de -sac, the repair or replacement of the cul -de -sac pavement and the restoration and sodding of the boulevards around the cul -de -sac. 10 (6) A connection between the proposed water main in Block 3 and the proposed water main system on the southerly part of the plat. The developer also shall make a connection between the proposed water main on Lydia Avenue at Highway 61 and the existing water main on the west side of Highway 61, south of Guldens. (7) The coordination of the water main alignments and sizing with the standards and requirements of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS). Available fire flow analysis shall be determined for the water system at the proposed apartment complex as well as through the existing 8 -inch and 12- inch crossings of Highway 61 at Beam Avenue. Fire flow requirements shall be verified with the Maplewood Fire Department. (8) All utility excavations located within the proposed right -of -ways or within easements. The developer shall acquire easements for all utilities that would be outside the project area. (9) A reduced number of sanitary and storm sewer manholes and water main bends by "cutting corners" with the utility alignments. The developer's engineer shall verify with the SPRWS the acceptable water main alignments and crossings. Manholes may be offset from the street centerline if the result lessens the number of structures. (10) Provisions for public utilities and service(s) to the vacant or undeveloped properties on the south side of the proposed Lydia Avenue. e. The drainage plan shall ensure that there is no increase in the rate of storm water run -off leaving the site above the current (predevelopment) levels. 3. Change the plat as follows: a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. c. Revise the lot lines in Block One and Block Three so there is a 18- foot -wide trail or pedestrian way between Lots 4 and 5, Block One and between Lots 6 and 7 or between Lots 8 and 9, Block Three to accommodate the proposed trails. d. Show the existing pipeline and the NSP and pipeline easements on the final plat. e. Show all public street right -of -ways at 60 feet wide. f. Make as many of the property lines as is reasonably possible radial to the cul -de- sacs or perpendicular to the street right -of -ways. g. If necessary, increase the lot widths for the lots next to the pipeline to ensure that the house pads will be at least 100 feet away from the pipeline. (code requirement) 11 h. Change the street names as follows: (1) Carey Heights Drive shall be used only in Block 2 (Phase One) of the project. The north /south street between Outlot A and Outlot B shall be Duluth Street. (2) Highpoint Court shall be called Ridge Place. (3) English Lane shall be called Ridge Lane. (4) The cul -de -sac in Block 3 shall be called Highridge Court. I. Show the extra ten -feet of street right -of -way for County Road D. 4. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including: a. Any off -site drainage and utility easements. b. Any necessary easements for the dedication and construction of Lydia Avenue. 5. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. 6. Record the following with the final plat: a. All homeowners association documents. b. A deed restriction prohibiting the construction of a dwelling or its attachments within 100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline. This affects Lots 3 through 6, Block 1 and Lots 7 through 18, Block 3 of the proposed preliminary plat the city received on June 30, 2000. The developer also shall notify the purchasers of the pipeline location. c. A deed dedicating 10 feet of additional right -of -way along County Road D for future street widening with the final plat. The applicant shall submit the language for this dedication to the city for approval before recording. d. A covenant or deed restriction with the final plat that prohibits the driveways on Lots 1, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 36, Block 3 from going onto County Road D. e. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision or splitting of the lots or parcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless approved by the city council. The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the city for approval before recording. 7. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading. 8. The owners of the properties at 1174 and 1176 County Road D shall change the addresses of their properties to Carey Heights Drive addresses within 30 days of the 12 contractor installing the base bituminous course for the new public street in front of their homes. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. D. Adopt the resolution on page 46. This resolution is for the on- street parking standards and no on street parking requirements for the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D and west of Highway 61. 13 CITIZENS' COMMENTS surveyed the owners of the 70 properties within 350 feet of this site and received 15 written replies. Of those who replied, 14 were against the project (primarily the apartments) and one was for the proposed plan. (Note: These comments were in response to the developers first proposal. The developer changed the proposed preliminary plat and site plan by dropping the Lydia Avenue street connection through the site after the planning commission meeting. This change was in response to neighbors concerns.) 1. We are very much opposed to the apartment complex - It is currently zoned commercial and the expectation of people who bought into this neighborhood is that it would remain commercial property. It would be unfair to add (potentially) 244+ people and cars to Duluth Street to access an apartment building. We bought into asingle- dwelling neighborhood - the traffic would be brutal to the current residents. It is also not fair to place apartments (with 20 percent low income housing) in such close proximity to higher income dwellings, where people have paid to be here. (Bradt - 1236 Summit Court) 2. 1 am strongly opposed to the development plan including apartments. Single family homes and moderately priced town homes OK. I think the future home owners of this new development would not appreciate apartment buildings next to their property as do I. This will reduce property values, increase traffic in areas which will not be able to handle the abundance of cars. There is also no way for this traffic to go north from this plan, except to use Duluth, my road to Summit. I do not wish to have my property and street used as a turn around - this is very dangerous for kids!! I also foresee longer bus rides for our kids. This is a single home area - Lets keep it that way and not degrade the neighborhood. (Johnson - 1216 Summit Ct.) 3. We like these plans with the exception of the 122 -unit apartment complex! This will depreciate the value of the homes in the neighborhood. This neighborhood is not low to moderate income housing! The apartment complex will produce heavy traffic on Duluth Street - this poses a serious safety hazard for the many small children who play in the neighborhood! The people who now live in this neighborhood payed top dollar for their lots and homes. We also pay high taxes! To mix an apartment complex with $350,000+ homes makes no sense. The 122 units will create 200+ additional cars driving up and down Duluth Street on a daily basis! (Jurgens - 1225 Summit Court) 4. We strongly oppose the 122 -unit apartment complex and twin -home in the new proposal. We want an alternative solution for connecting Duluth Street to the new Lydia Avenue. Looking at the proposed layout, the new residences would have to go to Highway 61 north via Seam Avenue. There are small children waiting for school buses on Duluth Street. We do not want any unsafe conditions to the children because of this heavy traffic. It would be better for the new residences to exit directly to Highway 61 north and south by using the unconnected Lydia Avenue or using County Road D. (Nguyen - 1226 Summit Court) 5. 1 am very concerned with having apartment buildings in this immediate area because crime usually comes with them. Our homes are prime targets especially since they are more costly than many nearby. I do not favor apartments built here by Frattalone. (Osell - 2970 Duluth St.) 6. The connection between Carey Heights and Duluth makes good sense - be sure to allow path easement through 1 or 2 yards on cul -de -sac to connect to park path under power 14 lines. The duplexes /town houses also are priced accordingly to neighborhood and would be a good fit with County Road D housing. No access through our neighborhood. The apartment complex is not a good fit. Typically apartment dwellers have 2 cars per unit. That is 244 cars extra on Duluth /Carey Heights loop depending on drivers destination (south to connect to light and go north or out back entrance to head west on County Road D). Also renters usually do not have the stability of homeowners or town house owners. Many negative statistics are relative to apartment complexes. We already have a large saturation of apartments on County Road D (in Vadnais Heights) to meet the quota of balance between housing of single and multiple ratios. Please do not add anymore apartment complexes. (Esch - 2993 Carey Heights Drive) 7. We object to Carey Heights Drive connecting to this new development. We already have two openings to this development. Carey Heights Drive is an independent street and we do not want it connected to High Point Ridge. (DeYoungs - 2964 Care Heights Drive Y 9 ) 8. We feel the larger "horse shoe" of single family homes is a welcome, positive and well planned addition to our neighborhood. Even the town homes by Masterpiece are well done. The one objection we have would be the apartments - since there already are so many on the north side of County Road D. (Schroeder - 3007 Frank Street) 9. As far as the city of Maplewood should be concerned, the welfare of its residents should come before personal interest of private enterprises. The city should demand that the original plan of building single family homes must be maintained to assure that the value and appearance of the neighborhood is maintained. When we built our homes in the 1990's, developers like Frattalone and Mogrens assured us that this area will have single family homes in the 2,000 square -foot- plus range. Since then, we have already witnessed that both parties did not keep their promise and allowed smaller homes to be built. The only line of defense for the residents is the Mayor and the city council. We are now relying on you to assure apartment buildings are not built in this area. The informational meeting already indicated to us that they plan to rent apartments to low and moderate income people. This is an invitation to increase crime in our area. The city council must reject this proposal in the best interests of its residents. (Pohlkamp - 2990 Edward Street) 10. Keep the bottom -right "leg" of the project zoned commercial since commercial use already in place north and south of it. A large apartment complex would double the traffic in the neighborhood (Kohiman Lake Overlook) since 120+ units about the same as the number of homes in place right now. Traffic use design not set to handle this amount. A more logical place for apartment expansion in the area is along County Road D between White Bear Avenue and Beam Avenue. There are several spots open along 1 -694 in this area. To me the apartment complex does not fit into the planning "flow." Down the hill right now it goes single - family homes down to businesses next to Highway 61. One could put in a row of town homes to soften the transition. We already have several apartments in the immediate area on County Road D, west of Highway 61, off 1 -694. Do not see the need for another at this location. Use wildflower mix for seeding non - mowable slopes on the grading plan. (Put a) Small tot park down by the pond in the Outlot B area. Does not seem unreasonable to make this modification since every inch right now is being carved out for residential sale. Why not make a small concession to meet the needs of the new neighbors? Policy of replacing removed trees. Obviously most, if not all, trees will be taken out by major grading effort. Be nice if new trees could be chosen from native varieties - more oak and less green ash. I 15 like the cul -de -sac for the 36 unit townhome complex - nice design! Since the turn around is already n lace at the end of Carey Heights Drive now, keep this expanded out and put y place in a center boulevard of trees to slow traffic coming down. Nice to do at the end of Duluth Street too. (Huntley - 3020 Edward St.) 11. I am opposed to the 122 multi - housing medium- density (apartments). I don't think it would be a good location. Too many occupants and the danger of overbuilding. Also opposed to the light manufacturing in a residential area., The noise factor was not addressed adequately. Please look more closely at natural sound barriers. Also opposed to additional town houses in Outlot D (24 units). Do you do any environmental impact studies? This whole development seems to be an overload on the land involved. I am also concerned about the road access during construction. We live at 1176 County Road D and the entire road access will be affected. (Owner -1176 County Road D) 12. We are strongly opposed to any type of apartment complex in this development. Secondly, we are concerned about the increase in traffic which maybe a result of such high density pausing. We would sympathize with the thought and feelings of our neighbors who are directly affected by this proposal (those on Summit Court - on the north side and the homes directly at the end of Duluth Street). (Herold -1247 Countryview Circle) 13. Looks like a well thought out plan and layout to me. (Rosell - Stillwater) Also see the letters on pages 32 and 33. also received several telephone calls from nearby residents. They expressed concerns about storm water drainage, the proposed housing mix (including the proposed town houses and apartments), passible assessments and increased traffic on Duluth Street. 16 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 45 acres Existing land use: A mining operation and accessory buildings from the former farm SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Houses and apartments across County Road D in Vadnais Heights South: Houses on Carey Heights Drive, Duluth Street, Summit Court and Gulden's West: Houses on Carey Heights Drive, Frank Street and Maplewood city park East: Highway 61 and frontage road PAST ACTIONS - Carey Heights Drive and Carey Addition 1. June 1964: The village council approved a preliminary plat for this area. 2. 8- 13 -64: A second preliminary plat was approved by the council. Council also approved a building permit for Mr. Carey at 1174 County Road D, subject to an agreement between himself and the village that he will not request any village maintenance on his private driveway, nor will he object to the construction of, and assessment for, a standard village street in the future. 3. 10- 21 -66: The city issued a building permit to Richard Barrett at 1176 E. County Road D. 4. 11 -9 -66: Richard Barrett signed an agreement waiving his right to a village street or maintenance of the private drive to his property and agreed to construct and maintain a private drive to his property. 5. 11- 10 -66: The village engineer reported to the council that the private drive did not meet village street standards and was not constructed to approved plans. Council authorized a building permit to be issued to Mr. Barrett subject to Mr. Barrett complying with the conditions in the engineer's report. 6. 11- 17 -66: The planning commission recommended approval of a preliminary plat for Richard Barrett consisting of four lots on the west side of Carey Heights Drive and the half streets required by council action of 11- 10 -66. 7. 11- 17 -66: Council approved a preliminary plat for the Carey Addition. This plat comprised only part of the Carey property including right -of -way for Carey Heights Drive, Woodlynn Avenue and Lydia Avenue. 8. 4 -4 -77: The planning commission recommended that the council table consideration of variances requested by Mr. Novak (build on a substandard lot, without frontage to a dedicated public street) to allow the applicant an opportunity to pursue the matter of dedication of the right -of -way (Carey Heights Drive) and pursuing a variance to standards of street and utility construction. 9. 9 -1 -77: Mr. Carey petitioned the city to improve Carey Heights Drive from County Road D southward approximately 1,500 feet. 17 10. 9- 28 -77: Council ordered a feasibility study for the improvement of Carey Heights Drive with public street and utilities. The study showed that the project would be cost - prohibitive. 11. 1- 26 -78: Council approved a lot area variance but denied two street access variances as requested by Mr. Richard Novak, based on the following findings: 1. The street access variances do not meet the "spirit and intent" of the ordinance. 2. A precedent would be set for similar lots in other areas of the city. 3. There may be times of the year when emergency services could not get access to the property. 4. There is no hardship that is "unique to the individual property under consideration." 12. On April 20, 1978, city staff recommended that the council declare the Carey Heights Drive improvement project not feasible and go no further with the project. Council tabled consideration to allow Mr. Carey "to contact his own source in regard to providing utilities on Carey Heights Drive." 13. On December 18, 1980, the city council approved a lot split request of Aaron Rupert to create a 13,500 square -foot lot on the east side of the private Carey Heights Drive. Mr. Rupert, however, never created the lot as approved by the city council. 14. On October 26, 1987, the council initiated a public improvement project for the construction of Carey Heights Drive, between Kohiman Lake Overlook plat and County Road D. 15. On February 27, 1989, the council held a public hearing about building Carey Heights Drive from Kohiman Lake Overlook development to County Road D. At this hearing, the council decided that the project was advisable, expedient and necessary and ordered the city engineer to prepare the plans for the project. However, the affected property owners did not want to provide the necessary public street right -of -way to the city. As such, the city never built the project. 16. On May 27, 1997, the city council considered the Carey Addition preliminary plat. The council tabled action on the plat until June 9, 1997 so the applicant and city staff could research four items. These included the: 1. Location of the pipeline and the proposed lot layout. 2. Need for a variance for lots that would be less than 10,000 square feet in area. 3. Possibility of adding traffic calming features and signage with the plat. 4. Possibility of adding stop signs to intersection of Carey Heights Drive and Frank Street. 17. On June 9, 1997, the council again considered the proposed plat. The council tabled action on the plat until June 23 or July 14, 1997. Frattalone Mining Operation June 28, 1982: The City Council approved a conditional use permit and three variances to mine this site. The CUP was subject to nine conditions. irol July 25, 1983: The Council renewed the permit for five years, subject to the original conditions. October 10, 1988, and October 20, 1989: The Council renewed the permit for one year, subject to the original conditions. October 22, 1990: The Council renewed the permit for three years, subject to the original conditions. March 25, 1991: The Council denied a permit change to add a material crushing /recycling operation to this site. January 10, 1994: The Council revised the conditions of approval for the permit and renewed the mining approval for five more years. A condition of this approval was that the permit would end in five years (in January 1999). PLANNING Existing Land Use Plan designations: R -1 (single dwellings) and M -1 (light manufacturing) Existing Zoning: F (farm residence) and M -1 (light manufacturing) Proposed Land Use Plan designation: R -3(M) (residential medium density) Reasons for the Requests This proposal needs a land use plan change because: 1. State law does not allow a city to adopt any regulation that conflicts with its comprehensive plan 2. One of the findings required by code for a CUP is that the use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan. The land use plan shows this site for R -1 and M -1 uses, which do not include multiple - family housing. The developer is applying for a CUP because the zoning on this site is F (farm residence) and M -1 (light manufacturing). The F zoning allows farms and single dwellings and the M -1 zoning allows for a variety of commercial and light manufacturing land uses. The developer chose to apply for a CUP, rather than a zone change. A CUP for a PUD is only for a specific use and site plan. A rezoning to R -1 (single dwellings) and to R -3 (multiple dwelling residential) would allow a variety of single dwellings and a variety of multiple - dwelling uses and plans. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL There are no specific criteria for a land use plan change. Any land use plan change should be consistent with the goals and policies in the city's comprehensive plan. Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. Refer to the findings in the resolution on pages 47 through 49. Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 19 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. APPLICATION DATE The city received the complete project plans for this proposal on May 26, 2000. The city received a revised preliminary plat and a revised site plan for the development on June 30, 2000. Sixty days from May 26 is July 25, 2000, and sixty days from June 30 is August 29, 2000. These are the dates by which the city council must take action on' the proposal unless the developer agrees to a time extension. kr /p: /sec4 /highpont. mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Land Use Plan Map (Existing) 3. Land Use Plan Map (Proposed) 4. Property Line /Zoning Map 5. Proposed Preliminary Plat date - stamped June 30, 2000 6. Proposed Site Plan date - stamped June 30, 2000 7. Proposed Grading Plan 8. Proposed Utility Plan 9. Tree Inventory Plan 10. Proposed Tree Plan 11. Proposed Intersection Detail 12. 5 -21 -00 letter from Jorgenson (1235 Summit Court) 13. 5 -23 -00 letter from Lambert (2986 Duluth Street) 14. 6 -16 -00 letter from Czech (MnDOT) 15. 7 -7 -00 traffic study memo from Benshoof and Associates 16. 7 -31 -00 traffic study memo from Benshoof and Associates 17. Land Use Plan Change Resolution (R -1, RA (S) and M -1 to R -3(M)) 18. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Resolution 19. . No Parking Resolution 20. Project Plans (separate attachments - including 11 x1 7s and full -size) 20 Attachment 1 VADNAIS HEIGHTS � D Z U Z � i w CM ST. °oars —� s. otxtnH Cr. 4. 11r01A AVE BEAM AVE� Q deft t9 J I oks � KOHLaUMI AVE. COUNTY ROAD C RAM OW ALAMW OR Ml l +o aD t cr. wow cue. p�pKt VE� A �s O�O�iT AVE BR0016 �}- � AVE CT. � a+ SE7( TAW � 111,11„r AVE All t.'ER14VS P►��. � ORAND11E1M AVE VMQK� pR. SHERM AVE •od Lola _ COPE AVE LA�tK SARK CT. LEL" 17 v +� g %VNCTM AVE � r� e � � $ CO. nowocE � AV cKweo�s sr �' (I "'� � � AVE. At AW. own Sa LOCATION MAP 21 - 4 N Attachment 2 interchange County Rd. D minor collector f° IF i ' minor Beam Ave. I collector y i i W 'O C U m r J ty Rd. C , - U O O a W I N E \, R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS R -3(M) = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OS = OPEN SPACE M -1 = LIGHT MANUFACTURING Gervais LAND USE MAP --------- PROJECT SITE (EXISTING) 22 i N Attachment 3 Vadnais Heights C -o w 0 Interchange M -1 i ►0 �F f minor Beam Ave. I collector V ?. t 1 0 01 County Rd. D qty Rd. C R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS R -3(M) = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OS = OPEN SPACE M -1 = LIGHT MANUFACTURING Gervais LAND USE MAP (PROPOSED) 23 `. 4 N Attachment 4 VADNAIS HEIGHTS 'l/ / jf V t 6 41 OAD COUNTY ROAD -01.4*9 171. .1 D . . . . . ..... =ant** 2 N 430 6' TWT, . — N 4 co C* f ' • TM 1&4 P%- VON Von T IED ASo N C * 4 N 1320 VM on %MM qrm qrm 1322 IM • s. 7 * H11 I I co tw,* 311 ii.i. PROJECT SITE 4 1% fp's W.. Ole .3090 Rl 3090 2'. % ;v 5 01i t , ry WSJ 19M 90 0 SOP TM% L PIPELINES V - • - -- - _ - _ _- NSP POWER LINES --­i--Cd (44) (7) ii ON 4" 4w IN qw, qb dw dim ' ' 9" PARK 6 Ow be � Q '�• +� `�. 0 7_ 'Yen 4 zb 9 3 A-C M w 0 w 9 0 -61 I&A If 1. IX x A U. 2 =j >> 6 PROJECT SITE 10 NEXUS Vq) 7 44-3 30 )l t 2 i N (0 299 Cq , 1-vt - A 29,,- 8 2999 N Ell" C 87 • 2988 2994 121.5"* A G 7 (45) jarl L A I!k SuMM CT GULDENS .2978 2975 3 1t: - = v�- ,,j • W 2976 2990 2999 co" CO -52970 . F csl N Z984 ,l.-;-0<296 "2962 2980 2968 1. 29 1 2 r AQ Nunn C. A 10 b AO&AW. ULM.# IL (31 cri _1 J 3 U) CI It, Ile IL RC -ee a FUTURE AUTO USE (27) (1419 0 71 .1% to 013 food 9p. is ow .13 14 # (29. '88) co 'LaMETTRY COLLISION 0 (19 14 0 s f4j)l 3 s lk Ili O E " M - (31) 4 GOLF COURSE 11 . - 1 (2k. MAPLEWOOD TOYOTA3 19 (.w wk -kff CT. _j • 41 1 42•Alk 1 1* 1 k I I • 110 o 11 BUILDING l ip v 4 20 21 .w Is o 1p.. ( 341% (35) 3 19 4-01564 rya . 11 Z 22 Cab.! e lse: '4. 19 2889 '' • / ZYM) 14 w — 1&1 !146 #SO.46 W- aim NUNN ALA ung- 1 - N Ono equ." INA 4% f AVLE E! BEAM AVENUE • I S' at 2 34 timl ran ST 0 3 dP4 at PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 24 Attachment 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . ... I ['1**.*.*.1:*.*.:. 1:::.­�,.] PROPOSED PHASE 1 ........... oV."-%%*- W. M. :OF. or TK .71.E. f/4. OF *1f W. 1. 1/4. VC. 4. N. P.. E? 1' ! COUNTY ROAL Q 0"IM LINE OF THE N.E. 1/4. OF THE M.E. 11 4. •-- --- - -- -_.._. %. __ - •___.�.... - _ _.�___f -- -- _.._. «.•_..- -. -_.• - r' --- * - 57' a - Ft?5S -e 1 _ - -- ' ©a •67 - R . 1� -� :6E 2.6 OEtfl? - ---�� _ _ ­ 4 •.f =�- V py:::: - - 't. 1 �:.: /::ri1.:- ::: :: ct .. t - E, .: L = 4 - - *� :>= - /::.:.:. : :. ': :r .:: ' ,- '' i=ce - - ' . - �.. :, k - - '......, :.vo :': • :.,!. = t' - •4 . :.� . :_} .: :!' }: _ *.1.1. :. =e ::.. ,.. s ... 1' �;�- . ,,:. A �. . "• ..� ! .�: .:�. :.,.. k .. :28 j:: a ::�Z'!�. .. :. k :: aA. '1 . :54 :;r I:. �' ;: . ... ;;;:;.:.mss -•= :1.::r:� .'2 ::$ l :: :.�.. ,: 1': ti .1 J� '. t .. ." ........ &.*..,.%.:,. _.:.7 j... ,Y - . .. .. ... .... .. \ .-:-N.-:-:-. -- - - :. • -..• ::•••. '*.'- ::t' . . ** ;w..:....:.. ... r.: .. : .. -::..:.*..: . ...... ........ As.- - .. j il. ?...... .. . .. .!.1.11�1.11 � :.t . _ .- .- :...::.: * .*,: �: �. ... " y '•::: ': ��:'. .* ... N :v - %. .1.'. T . . . ... . . .. ... ..:: . ... ...0. I" I l I �'' �/ . * ` s: �,. '; '" �i ::- - - w1p ::.:. .... .......:...... w - �: t ; .... . ........ I... .. A. iit - .... .. I - _ .- Y �}� . ..: . \ .............. .. . .. . 1: . .. ... . y:. :. , "' ":.*.1.1.1:!.::.*=:* ....... ; :�'::::: ... :i . -.:.:.-..-. .. - :' %%*..1.:!­.1.%'�' � �. �: " * , :ate:::: 1. -.--- - ....... ........,-. . . 1. ..: 1.-._-.-. . - :.T '•t' '. .... ­ ­8 :: �' . . .... ....... �:: , 'i 1. . :.. :` ::. .- - .- :::= .... .. .• :� ,:.'. -,-..; __ --- : N I ?' HID :t: i ♦♦ ­ *­**:7.1 fi f c ........ - - .;; . . .......................... k ..... .�.i: . .... .... ....♦..:,!... Yr.w ♦• r• 'T :`42.t7 i:ii .4 .. - �_�K _ - __� -: -, - '� � b •. 1 •• . -_ - _ _ __ _ • .......... 10 ; _ ,&:_ - - -- 1 ... ��- ! �p '.' MD' :..!!s!!i^Am : ;� :� •:CX =. 60. 13575¢2 1•: ::: . . .� .... .... . .. ... ... / .. I . . . _. - _ -- - _ - i/G•.. ,. __� Jr. OT__ - -- 46 l m - - -- _ 1>i�.7 . J � Z . /• r+l K rHASE 1 AREA TAOU SINGLE FAMILY: 7.b ACRES 13 LOTS) TOWNHOME: I" ACRES (56 LOTS) AFAR:TMENT: 6.9 ACRES (122 UNITS) CITY STREET 9001. 1.6 ACRES TOTAL rUV 04CLUDING OUTLOTS: TOTAL UNITE: 222 TOTAL AREA: 44.5 ACRES TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY AREA: 14.4 ACRES (28 LOTS) TOTAL CITY STREET ROW: 2.4 ACRES • 12.0 ACRES Y AREA. S ING L E FAMILY NET s GL A s LOTS • e.3 cRE RE ) TOTAL TOWN HO ME A OT (�2 1 NITS ) .6 ACRES 22 U REA: 6 i• A M LEX NT CO ( TOTAL At'ARTME TOTAL MNDOT ROW: 1.1 ACRES • 6A UNITS TE R ACRE C3lCOf 6 NSITY. AVER AC..E SINGLE FAMILY LOT (ENTIRE SITE): 21.200 5F AVERAGE TOWNHOME DOUDLE LOT (ENTIRE SITE): 11.800 6 0 R E C E D J U N f to R� -, . dw Ut z / • I• $ G). ' ,wt , i 7.16 t -Z S •M.. • -' - t r �f' •1 S E / 3L C 64E ... • J i 4 I .. � !'� i :: yr •':' , • N < ", ** * 7. ♦r0• �. a 0� 1 QQ i � ... 1%1.%1.1.1.7.1.1*"..*.jkM . N T :� t �.• - -- - i -� - - - -t- ♦ I �r t �. 4 � .? t I �'i i , 1. V s •w 1' -+ .. I' i l r �: pp i 0 :!S 40- . �C « n 1:' - r __ 3 ..�l �::iL ...ww i:.i'irww U2 • '� y A. try' -� / M. Q ! r •r• t • 2' O �.. f G 1• 1 T• .� ;' • _ 3 0• -- 'i i 1 / SS 1 :7 ♦� 1 w r • F it SO �. G- 0 1 •. . . . i 1 1 .. . .. .; ........... ? :t. r O - / 'sic ! ....... ....... A. . .. / l t be / -r r-• OUT1.Ot i�� . .. ... 1 � V' -­ -, .:., -.-. :. . _... . . . . I 1 I. . ..... M... *.,.,.:-.:*.:. jj :1/� •� is M . "1 1 .. :. i .*.,.* z MI. ­.1.'.'._ :.•+ :: `. '. *. .:.o e�.....7 - + !. / ....... %: \. \ i %t .. i �:� r 1 J r �Af' �7tv�iT A P. .. 1 Y. �• 1 . I: - 1 % .'..­.*Jr.*.*. ���:: P 1 11 _I !. . .. _ . . •' 1 ��..h r ..... __ '.I.'. - a �:. - .. :M%'. * %% . " ,:.,.,. ... . . .N%:., :+ /. .� I ,:. -� a_ .� % r' J� _ i �X ` i r. • I�. w i i - 1 1 X . w� I 1.1.*.". - ..f ..... M ..... M ., /._.� • t • w . �i *K 32 r J� � i - -a /- / l.'. L� J ,. i i �'r' '.1: :�'. 1 % i ��. o0 1 T.•�• _ I 1 _ I I _ • .t / I 1 1 T 1 < i ! rM t ' 1 1 4. =f' ' �.. I i I :'l -_ I I F 1 \ r 1 1 / -._ r.: J Pt :s i e: MNDOT 1 'mot 1 I r�/�� r -, , - % . , �I / 1 r i is iti .'t: • ' ~- "`�• +�- I" '•:' , �.�.. t IVY 1 LO 1 C' ^' ' M. r 1 ;, :i :�_.. O,UTLOT A .... C ; ' I ! 86 UNlT i (. ,,� ♦ .) �!-- -C-� - :' : �' .: {':': 1 .1::; ' . / _ t I r0WNHOME ! o . CL M. I ; : is - ,,EFL, '. -- . I - - .. «. . _ - .__ i . :::::. :: , . -__ �._. _,_ 'Im ** . ;.,. ., - .'... .'.%n -,:.* ... 7.1* 2. .�.� &-v!&-#?.'* - : . '. dL ....71 . . . M. ;7ss�: �' 1 I `; : V •�-••• i M6IJ.OIS�t, t 1 �; ( I j � I ..�.+ „-rte .I. •1 • • i » _. __..r.•.- w_ 4, �- : r • 1 11 4 'M :i 1� } 1. '.1 .' 4 . �, ...%_ . It l V , r.. ; ' 1 _ ' '� I .1 l I : \:. t ;.I ., r I . I : / I ,.. I , 1 �! �t:r .�S • IIC- F. 5 . 7 _� , . /1. ' . .. �;t •_ X41 :[ , . V. .: t lii'46'4�ti 1� : ' .F� 4 ' I ° 1 -j -- -- - - . - t 1i - _ 1 VEN E - .._ Q 11 I � ; i -�1 y,i`_ --, 1�1N M ►, ( ' ti0i i4 4s'9; :�:.:.: 19 .Q •f:� -LiQ- t'417- -�•%'47�If rr ..- + r ��; I i 1 6 co % fJ fi 1 �4 ' i,• 1 I `% j i i so t11Ft. ' i 1 I I. 1 S.C. COk. � THE � I�I� r 1 I % f/:: 1 .� !��\ �-+ t I i i M.E. 1 /�.,�.- TIIE - %.E- ,ISO' 1-00 � r' , - ,, � I 1 �: �� i i i i IIC i 4 I i SEC /<. T. 2L a. tr L___ - --� `t. em. of Tf: I LI: -- -• - -• --•1 a- /.0 ' j : ; i..: ' N. � f /4. • �4. OF TK N.E. 1/4. 5AN UNE OF 11t M.C./ 1/4, OF TNl: MNTME15 =LL. 4. 1'. 37. M. t ' ' s4lf , I 1 u 11 I C t T. 21i. A. V9 I ' I , I. �,. 1 r 1, 1 r� ' / T ! �JLt��1'I _ II i /� 1 KOOLMAN LAKE % .� �, (�'U N I t-c Y V' ' Nti C I OVEr DUK t C I - \ I PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT 25 4 N Attachment 6 rRDFOSED rHASE I PROPOSED LOT AREAS C" rs L—J SITE PLAN 26 i N Attachment 7 71t- Vim IF SQ.. is 1 i - - - • all PROPOSED GRADING PLAN 27 4 Locatlon of "no ba&,W oh &W nuu"o % tor ro q F -4 A V46 4C 7, I s 'o o p PP r W !M" r*b II PROPOSED GRADING PLAN 27 4 Locatlon of "no ba&,W oh &W nuu"o Attachment 8 Jj < — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 24 / 25 J � i • dW% 2 21 t Wo j \' �,�� is .40 t x ,.6 — -_ qftb jr, Lc�csf�oh of M po*w an � was I ` ! _' El looll lane v olp USA t "Coal IS ..... A J V I v PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN w l i N Attachment 9 Tree nwrWse IoGAW in this Md and as Ww*MW b Ca& Inc. Site wntalnis 121 Ur treas As &UwriWd b the C10 of kupimood. T and number summadwd me fblWm: OAk 29 Elm I Ash 40 DIAGk OWf 14 15Avewwd 4 Flne 17 ?J lop if 4C WC .1 Arp 6 1B .43 3o et "ANA -A6. N A 4�14 Ai Cup l ea At this time It Is Anti I xW that all lar trees will W removad,, as the g radin g Ilm1w Gx p , w rt y ro afta to the pm boundary Minor x W made to the g radin g p wh1oh would allow of &Mw traft. The olu of traft to be planted will be at lust 2.5 l"G1165 In diameter. The WGsVbn and epwWo W not y et Wen datemlW. l am„ M oe F El el I f v ��f � I -E. fe Z it W.* X. S 4r n 4L 07. E it IN o f ��f � TREE INVENTORY PLAN 29 fe Z it W.* X. S 4L o f FE. L AN Wr W • r :�1 1 TREE INVENTORY PLAN 29 Attachment 10 N.W. CNyi. K TW �•1.E. 1/4 w <Wi 1f.11. 1/a EC. A. T. K A. w COUNTY ROAD D . - -- A pi 89 - w •s As f E Aug. AM4. NCPW LINE sF nE M.E. 1/4 W fig M.E. ua SM. 4 . !'�"� y ;! • S-= '��:.. -� (661. BEE —= _ ,Ad*A ' Aa - • :a.,.. Wes. - -'- © E ALr 'Gt iz L wArrieas W" %L N W.MWO by T�•�• $ 5vfL .,if 'T•c Na t • T14L i�.N•cQ.,w�s. K� t..,o.mc Fwr♦ A 6L Two Tfsas • � o i • .L •• ' i - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - ---- - - - - -- 1- - -_- -- -- - -- -- �! _�! :�= = - - - -- 'f 5lzc� • I+'Ti,L pw..ra )►, PATS J�a:�• f f 1 ----- r ----------- - - - -_- - __..._N�------- - - - - -- - - - - -� sN�- - - - - -- • ' � so ft- MN= "NNW an am. !!"M 1 � JJ • 5. 89 'S7 32 E640.51 v ' S . Nom' 500 �17•E 71. � � •Sa • 24*'E -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ----------- N•-------- -_- •._r.-__ - --- , ��. �� Wk • • v -- ----- - - - - -- - - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- -- - ------------------------ - - - - -- art- - - ---- •'� • • -• i `A - 4M. 64 . , fit •� ; • • 1 a = ;L•49.62 /• W . Nab •- - ,-• - - Ct. • .. Q ' a ao ' W Z Q 1 • ?. 1 { 14 r • . . _ _ • 1 499 16 1 1 14S E — — -- _ ..� ��. COfi. K 1'fE N � ♦ 1 � !6E T. M. si:. ... ,....' W Tf1E O.E. t/L L INE OF E. s/a K iME 10111Att 1/b rec• t. >� #'' at - : • �;_ _ t . 1 i SUMMIT IKO HL AN LAKE I COUNTRY Ew OVERLOOK i PROPOSED TREE PLAN 30 4 N Attachment 11 Prop000d Interjection of Lydia Ave. and Highway 61 (Approx scale lit 501 C/) Z) ,, 0 Z a 1�k -.0 / n ge I � a I' (EXISTING) � ti h ti L � o � (PROPOSED) 1 ( Q � m j � � Q HWY 61 OµNE \NG . � Pro posed PROPOSED NEW DRIVEWAY Alignment 1 EXISTING PARKING L OT / 1 Y PROPOSED INTERSECTION DETAIL 31 4 N Attachment 12 BRENT R. JORGENSON 1235 Summit Court Maplewood, MN 55109 H: 612- 481 -7825 W: 612- 481 -4076 May 21, 2000 Mr. Kenneth Roberts Community Development Department City of Maplewood 1830 East County road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Roberts: I have read the Neighborhood Survey letter you sent and I also attended the recent meeting that the Development Team had in Gulden's Restaurant. I am a homeowner and my property is adjacent to the South Side of the Proposed Development. There are a couple of areas of great concern with this proposal. Our strongest objection is the proposed Apartment complex. Apartments in general have a negative impact on property values. This complex also calls for a portion of it to be allocated for Low - Moderate Income housing, which would further erode property values. The high density of this proposal will significantly increase the traffic in our neighborhood to an unacceptable level. Traffic from the majority of the development South of the power lines will be forced to drive down Duluth Street to access North bound Highway b 1. The properties adjacent to the project site are currently zoned R1 with a small portion being M1. We would support development with a majority of the property being zoned R and a strip of M1 along Highway 61. Thank -you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Brent Jorgenson Ann Jorgenson 32 Attachment 13 May 23, 2000 Community Development Dept VED City of Maplewood e 183 E County Rol B Maplewood, MN 65109- 2797����_�_�_w_ w In reference to this proposed building plan offered by Mr Frattalone, we are very concerned about the following issues: 1. We DO NOT OPPOSE the 34 single houses on Carry Drive nor the 36 unit Townhome complex. The 34 single homes would add value to the existing homes on Duluth St and the Cul de Sacs leading off Duluth St 2. We DO OPPOSE the 122 unit apartment complex for the following reasons; a. Lower the value of current homes on Duluth St and Cul de Sacs to include the proposed 34 single family homes. be With the current traffic flow on Rte 61, a burden of traffic volume would increase on Duluth St via Lydia Ave to include Jcts Beam Ave and Rte 61. 3, We DO OPPOSE Lydia ave between Duluth St and proposed English Lane for obvious traffic volume on Duluth St. 4. We Attended a meeting with Mr associates and they could not that will occur on Jcts Lydia of Beam Ave and Rte 61. Mr Fr as to the traffic flow during equipment vehicles. Frattalone and his address the traffic problem ave and Rte 61 nor the Jcts attalone was also not clear the construction by PREVIOUS SITUATION OBSERVATION. Reference to the construction of Toyota dealership and Lemetrys Body Shop on Rte 610 1. The general opinion of the neighborhood on Duluth St and Cul de Sacs were opposed to the construction. They were constructed. 2. We understood that Toyota dealership would refrain of having their employees parking on Beam ave and off loading vehicles on Beam ave. SITUATION REMAINS TO EXIST with the parking and off loading. Comparing the Toyota dealership and Lemetry construction, what are we to believe with the Frattalone construction. Gym &EgoTaft- r Dua , It 33 ��pNESp 7 0 r Or Attachment 14 M i nn esota D epartment of Transportation Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road 132 Roseville, MN 55113 June 16, 200+ Ms. Melinda Coleman City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Subject: Highpoint Ridge Mn/DOT - Metro Division Plat Review ##500 -013A West of Trunk Highway 61 and South of County Road D Maplewood, Ramsey County Control Section 6222 Dear Ms. Coleman Please be advised that the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced site plan. Before any further development, please address the following issues: ■ Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often results in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Mn/DOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures. The project developer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impacts of any highway noise. Please direct questions concerning Mn/DOT's noise policy to Jim Hansen (651-582- 13 92) of our Transportation Planning section. ■ Any impact to Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Please direct questions regarding permit applications to Keith Van Wagner (651 - 582 -1443) of Mn/DOT's Permits section. The above comments are in addition to those in our letter correspondence we sent to you dated April 7, 2000. Please address all future correspondence for development activity such as plats, site plans, environmental reviews, and comprehensive plan amendments to: Sherry Narusiewicz Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B -2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Please note that Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. An equal opportunity employer 34 Feel free to contact me at (651) 582 -1771 if should have any questions. cerely, Paul Czech Senior Transportation Planner/Local Government Liaison Copy: David Claypool - Ramsey County Barry Morgan - Master Civil & Construction Engineering, Inc. Mn/D -OTDiviion _Fi-l-e — C. SA 22- -2— - - — - Mn/DOT LGL File - Maplewood 35 IUL -0 7-2000 16!29 AENSNDDF 9 ASSOC. Attachment 15 952 238 1671 P.02/07 BENSHOOF & AS*SOCIATES, INC. TRAN3P'ORTat10N ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 10417 W Of�i�,10A B OtJLEVARb. SVC'M TWO / HOPKINS. MN 66543 / (A62) 2W*1 07 /FAX (9= 2W1877 Tiny T 20M Refer to Fes: 00-52 MEMQ►gANDUM TO: Flank Frattaloae�� FROM James A . Bw f and Paul D. Klappa RE: Results of Traffic Study for Highpoint Midge SSE AND BACKGRdUNA rnb M momdu is to ft the ofd on trio volumes on Irby roadways due to tt propoW Highpoint R ge mdden d oprnent in Maplewood, MN, The dev elopment is to be located in the southwest cornet of the in ersection of qty Road D and 'fH 61. A requeod, the moix of our study is to address questions reg ng the extent to which the pressed deveior=t will in volumes on s# ws in the residenft ndghborhood south of the Hi hpoint Ridge site, we have ad res d theme quadons by recording istintr volumes on pot en t y affected sftets and by proj g the volume fn that will be caused by the pr developmem, There are fog ents to the prqmud dat development, First, 28 sWglc- y homm axe proposed on a U extension of Carey Heights Drive that conneeU with Duluth Avenue. Second, a 122 - tt t went =nplex is prcWsed east O t - ily bomas. ' s rent commix would be bounded on the east by the sartg `I'H 6 1 savi � ce drive. Third, 36 townhome udts are proposed on the west and south sides of the - no t complex. Finally a 3 - unit townhome complex is 4 - proposed north of the single famUy homes and south of County Read D,, 'these 36 mute would have dwir sole ac= via County Rwd D. Three other reads are proposed to serve the trvXPic weds of the development. An cast/west road {Lydia Avenue} originating at the south seMce drive accts is proposed. Thaw, a norfh/sauth road MagUsh Line) located west of the apartment complex would connect to Lydia Avenue and servo a portion of the townhomes and the apartment 36 JUL -07 -2000 16!29 PENSNOOF & ASSOC, 952 238 1571 €x.03/0' Mf. Ftnk Frattalone -2- July 7. 2000 complex. An additional east/west mad "point Court) is proposed south of the apLerL t oomplex. Dur study o+ ulc= two ric�a far mov=ent of tic within tho develop t. I assumes that flu= is no eotme ctiou prosvi d betwe the 28 singIe- homes and the t %onhomes and al iients to the eft, A11 of the s�giewfi=ty home ��e would ' ' Duluth Stet or Camy Helhts Drive. The =Me geneated by the townhomes and aimtrments would have its onl mss at the servi dive on TH 61. Sconanoo 2 considers that == be PMvidW beMeen the ummhome/ eat compl and the I+e family home portions of the developmeat. Under this o, tmfflc from the single - bey homes would have the opdon of u .. the TH 61 am= via LY&& Avenue extm&ug to Duluth Street. The to*mhomehpattment traffic wouW also have the opfon of u� � s to Bum Avenue via Duluth Stet thmugh the eaistiag raghborhood to the south' TRAM vO In order to establish existing daily traf6ic volumes in the neighborhood south of the 1�Fo dP�t, 48-hour traffic volume counts were made at four locaticros where the gre�si impacts of the propoud development are 8tltiCipat�d. These locations are all on residentiat sttWts with multiple existing reatdential drives almg their lengths. These locations are a3 follow+s: • Duluth Sit, j ust north of iii Ave, Cam Heights Drive, just east of Ptak Stmt Lydia Avenue, just cut of Walter St. Frank SUM, just north of Bam Ave. These rousts were made Wednesday, June 28, 2000 tiimwgb Friday, June 30, 2000 u0img auComatic traffic recording (ATR) equipment. At the timR of the ATR placement, obsarvations were made of the edstiae Wfflc patterns and roadway fadlities in the area of the developnmt, Usk the site PIM for the prposeed development and Wormation published by the Institute of e r n igines VI's), the new trips generated b the sed Y � de*V0k7Mt _ate estimated . Table 1 provides the trip g P n ratlan for thp, P d - 4 1 e opmwc Under ell uses, it is that 50% of the daily trips will be —9-9.W the development an 50% of the daily trips gill h leaving th development. 37 JUL. -07- -2000 16 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 952 2:3B 16 71 P.04/0 W. F'r FratWone * July ?, 20 The ovmU development is expenDd to geaente nearly 1500 daily trips. Of thewo 211 tips to/from the nab Unvubme campy wiU R y onto County Rm d D and not travel thro4h the ne ghbarho od in qwmdm,, 7U WzShio-fimifly honm are tad to generate 268 coy trips. 'The g 1020 tdpa wilt be to/from the ent tawnhome complex and the apartment compla Table Z Da�iy Trip Generation for Highpa3nt ltfdge DeYelapmrnt Laad Use East Townttoma See (!�w 'Un�s 36 Rate 5.86 i)aity Trip Ends 211 A t COMPIM. 122 6,63 809 Subtoui. l 1020 S' le Family Humes Z$ 9.57 258 Subtotal 12$8 North Townbome Com 36 5,86 Zil Tout 1499 Throu # use of the odsting traffic patt as ab ved by our site visit aad the traffic fim ilities of the mmounding area,, trip distribution rcenta�ea by twine and diction w det�ned as fnjjows for the near_ trips Senerated by the development. 4596 of trips ta/from the south on TES bi 1096 of the tips Wolfram the asst can beam Avenue 5% of the trips to/from the west on County Road D • 359b of the Crlps to/fram the north on TH 61 • 596 of trips from devtYagment to the east on County Rom D; triese trips are eacpect� to return W the development via i- 694lT`H bi w !UL -07-2000 1 G : 30 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 952 238 1671 P-05/07 W, Fmt* Frattaione 4 - July 7, 200 using the divectional diStribution yaw n tages, trips were Om fined to the ima dways sag the development. The assignment of 4welopment fps to particular routes accounted for the f0owin its; • Mom provisi�s of the two eon eyed � Cove' RMd D has U ace= at 61. (Left turns are not permitted from oUnty Road D) • T& north entrance of the savice drive provides right - turn access only. n o south entrance of th e swvice drive provides fi mss. Bum Avenue in 6 1 with Mtrol and provides praye d left turn onto and of of Beam Avenue. Using the above consider — anions and the rive convenience of an acorn points, traffic generated by the development was asdgned to #hie roadway systm. Linder both s� =M ftm the f Uy homes and the ��entltownhorne comp lex was conside�d mdMduaffy to account for the their . ty to individual access pc tits. Furher, as different routes are ma to be used, ftffie -n wmg the devdopment was con sldered sepamtely from the ftffic exiting the deveJopment. Under Smnado I there is no `t for the apa townhome complex tmffic W travel fl= ugh t the neighborhood, Under Scenario 2, we that 45 of the y __ Pq 9 . trams to/from the ogle -family homes wig make use of the Lydia Avenue access to 61, and 14 of the daily ftft tolftm the townhomes and ents MU travel dwough the subdivision south of the proposd dev►etopment. IF wing the trip genomflon and assipmen4 the additions tra generated by the development was added to the exisftg haft using streets in the neighborhood to the south. Figure 1 shows a tug and poste anent duty frame volumes at font moons each development 'o. Under Scenario 1, the a A inane in dully ftffie volumes are axWted on Carey Heights Drive and Duluth Street with an additional 134 daUy vehicles at each location. Under Sco 2, the greatest increase is at Duluth street with an in of 161 dsd vehicla, Lam Heights Drive would cadence an additional 1 des peg day under S � Further, under both scenarios, all volute remain below 680 daily vehicles... 39 6 JUL-07-2000 16:30 SENSHOOF & ASSOCS 952 238 1671 P,06/07 6CENARI01 -, NO CONNECTION BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY 'HOMES AND APARTMENTWCONWS TO EAST OOUNW FX= D // T p] 4-13 +12-11 361/4ft _ REAM AVE scEwlo 2 - CONNECTION PROVIDED BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND APARTMENT81CONDOS TO EAST cwoctm Room V // 14 4- (c q. 2911107 361/521 FRANK FRATTALONE TRAFFIC STUDY FOR FIGURE I HIGHPOINT RI E DEVELOPMENT IN DAILY TRAFFIC r%d" AA, MCI VOLURM &%PLEWOOD 40 JUL- 07 -0�10 1 =1 BENSHOOF ASSOC. 95 238 1 71 P- Mr, Far& FratWane 106w- July 7. 2000 CONCLUSIONS The MatwpoliUm Council has a oily v olume, fteshotd of 1,000 ve' ddes for ant t �. 'his means that redd=U strer u with tmft volumes below 1,0o vehicles per day are expected to gate sp y and in a miner to the h.itMdty of the, ood.. The daily ftffic volute on the struts wit& the neighborhood south of the pnc"sed drr pment remain below 6W vehicles per day under both conarios. Given this, we ue Aay.&+ tit the p pos d Fighpoint Ridge development will not cause n impacts on the nearby rwidentW suvft under +ether devinent Timoush our study, we identifted an it= of safety ice m under existing coaftions. No taffic control is provided at the in Mdon of Camy and Frank Stwt. Given tha exis volumes and per visbility to the south from the east leg of thin irate lei on, we a oMutW the City to =sWer two~ - way std =fti fbr cidw the north end sou& kpl or ft as! zW west leg of this I n 'ten. In tfon of two WAY stop control w ould existing and potentW future tmffic at Ods ration. TOTAL P.0? 41 JUL -10 -2000 14:05 aENSH00P & ASSOC. 952 230 16 ?1 P.02/02 13ENSHOC3 &ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 10417 EXCELSIOR souLFvARa, sung Two i HoPKINS MN 55343 /(952) 238 -1667 / FAX (952 ) 238-1671 July 10, 2000 W , Fra& Frattalone 3066 S pn= StrMt Little Canada, MN 55117 REFER - M FIS0 - 52 Supplemental Traffic Informa Reprding Proposed Ifthpolut Ridge D evblopmaat Dear Fmk: This lsAW is to supplement the traffi review we presented in a memorandum dated July, 7 2000, for your Nghpaint Ridile development in the City off4plawood. Specifically, you have eked us to address the extent to which the development would increase volumes on TH 61, Based on data from the Mnnesota Department of Trans porWon, the current volume on 'H 6 at the location of your proposed Lydia Avenue intersection 18 28,500 voWcles per day.. If ym development were conitmded in accordance with Scenario 1 desmibed in our Idly 7 rpot k namely no emecdon b+atw Lydia Avenue and Muth Sv the dally volume on 'H 61 would i ncrease by 390 vehicles (one paroent) north of Lydia Avenue and by 670 vehicles "(two percent) south of Lydia Avenue. If your development were co ructed in accordance with Scenario 2 descdibed in our T'uly 7 reps with a co on betwe Lydia Avemse and Duluth Street the daily volume on TH 01 would increase by 340 veb cles (one pE t) north of Lydia Avenue and by 580 vehicles (two pint) south of Lydia Avenue, As indleated above, the voh a of deve lopment gips added to TH 61 is very small relative to the emist ng volume on TH 61, Arth this y r sit incream, we are confident tit the Hi point Ridge development will n cause any sig6fiant impacts to bsfflc flaw on TH 61. i Skcerdy, BEN OOF &ASSOCIATES, INC. dames A. Be�shoof TOTAL P . 02 42 Attachment 16 BENSHOOF &ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 10417 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, SURE TWO / HOPKINS, MN 55343 / (952) 23 8-1667 /FAX (952) 238 -1671 July 31, 2000 Refer to File: 00-52 IR MEMORANDUM AUG 0 12000 TO: Frank Frattalone FROM: James A. Ben oof and Paul D. Klappa RE: Supplement to Traffic Review for Highpoint Ridge PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND The purpose of this memorandum is to supplement the traffic review we presented in a memorandum dated July 7, 2000, for the proposed Highpoint_Ridge residential----- development in the City of Maplewood. Specifically, we have been asked to address concerns of the City regarding the site access onto TH 61 at the southern intersection of the west frontage road with TH 61 (future Lydia Avenue). An additional visit to the site on July 18, 2000 was made to observe the intersection characteristics and operations. We also had conversations with MnDOT staff and City staff and police to better understand the issues at the intersection. The proposed development would result in 122 apartment units and 36 townhome units that would have their sole access onto the frontage road on the west side of TH 61. These residential units are located on a 13.4 -acre parcel of land that is currently zoned M -1, light manufacturing. The northern intersection of the frontage road I . intersects TH 61 with access that allows right turns only. The southern access of the frontage road with TH 61 provides full access. This access is the only break in the median on TH 61 from County Road D to Beam Avenue. Left turn lanes with approximately 225 feet of storage are provided on TH 61 for both northbound and southbound traffic. No right - turn lanes or lighting is provided at this intersection. Through our conversation with Wayne Lemaniak at MnDOT, we learned that MnDOT is satisfied with the proposed access for the development and does not foresee any safety concerns following the development. They have suggested minor geometric changes to the access, which the developer has agreed to complete. 43 Mr. Frank Frattalone -2- July 31, 2000 The City has raised questions about the safety of the intersection following completion of the development. City staff and police have indicated that their main concern is increased volumes of left- turning traffic leaving the development. A principal factor that influences this volume is the total number of trips generated by the site. To address this point, we have compared trip generation for the proposed development with the number of trips that would be generated if the property developed with alternative uses allowed under City zoning designations. Also, we have addressed measures that could be taken to improve traffic operations at the intersection if difficulties should arrive. COMPARATIVE TRIP GENERATION The proposed apartment complex and townhome units are to be located on a 13.4 -acre parcel of land that is zoned M -1, light manufacturing. A discussion with Ken Roberts with the City of Maplewood indicated that under current zoning, most types of commercial, retail, or light industrial development could be located on the site. Based on these conversations and observations of other business on TH 61 in the vicinity, we have developed three alternative scenarios for the proposed site. We believe these alternative scenarios to be consistent with existing conditions on TH 61 and allowable within existing zoning ordinances. These scenarios assume floor area ratios between 0.2 and 0.3 and would meet the City code requirement of 85 % maximum impervious surface. The alternative development scenarios are as follow: 1) A two -story office complex with gross floor area of 175,000 square feet 2) A 150,000 square foot light manufacturing facility. 3) Anew auto dealership and a 90,000 square foot warehouse facility. Trip generation was estimated for the proposed residential development and three alternative development scenarios using information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers ( The daily, a.m. peak hour, and p.m. peak hour trip generation is presented in Table 1. All three alternative scenarios generate more trips in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours than the proposed residential development. Alternative development scenarios 1 and 3 generate more daily trips while Alternative 2 generates fewer trips than the proposed residential development. The comparative trip generation suggests that the proposed residential development will generate similar or smaller volumes of traffic than alternative commercial uses for which the property is currently zoned. 44 Mr. Frank Frattalone -3- July 31, 2000 Table 1 Comparative Trip Generation for Highpoint Ridge Development Scenario Land Use Size Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Rate Total Rate Total Rate Total Proposed Townhomes 36 d.u. 5.86 211 0.44 16 0.54 19 Apattanents 122 d.u. 6.63 809 0.51 62 0.62 76 Total 1020 78 95 Alternative 1 Office (2-Story) 175,000 s . ft. 11.01 1927 1.56 273 1.49 261 Alternative 2 Manufacturing 150 000 s . ft. 3.82 573 0.73 110 0.74 111 Alternative 3 New Auto Sales 25 s . ft. 37.5 938 2.21 55 2.8 70 Warehouse 90 s . ft. 4.96 446 0.45 41 0.51 46 Total 1 1 1384 96 1 116 CANDIDATE MITIGATIVE MEASURES As mentioned previously, MnDOT staff has indicated that the southern intersection of the frontage road with TH 61 presently operates in a satisfactory manner, and they expect that adequate operations will continue after completion of development. However, if difficulties should arise in the future, the City and MnDOT would have several options available to restore satisfactory operations. Such options include: • Installation of a traffic signal. • Reduce intersection to �/ access. This would eliminate left -turns onto TH 61, but retain all other movements. • Reduce intersection to right -turns only. • Install lighting at the intersection to increase visibility at night. • Install aright -turn lane on southbound TH 61 approaching the intersection. Another potential improvement relates to the City's interest to create a combined signalized intersection of County Road D and the eastbound I -694 ramps with TH 61. This might also include an extension of the frontage road to the north to intersect County load D. When implemented, these improvements would provide an alternative route for trips from the development to the north, such that these trip would not have to make a left turn directly onto TH 61. Given all the above potential mitigative measures, we are highly confident that no problems will arise at the southern intersection of the frontage road with TH 61 that could not be effectively resolved. 45 Attachment 17 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Frank Frattalone proposed changes to the city's land use plan from R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium . density) for the site. WHEREAS, this change applies to property for the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D and west of Highway 61 in Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the applicant also requested a change to the land use plan to drop the planned minor collector street between County Road D and Highway 61. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On June 19, 2000, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent, notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the western part of the proposed plan (west of the existing M -1 zoning line), including the plan amendment for the area west of the M -1 line. 2 On July 10, 2000, the city council discussed the proposed land use plan changes. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. 3. On August 14, 2000, the city council again considered the above- referenced requests. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council the above - described changes for the following reasons: 1. The development would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. 2. The town house and apartment sites in the development are proper for and consistent with the city's policies for medium and high- density residential uses. These include: a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing and proposed low density residential and commercial land uses. b. It is on an arterial street and is near a collector street. 3. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. The proposed single dwellings will separate the proposed town houses and apartments from existing homes. b. There should be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing local residential streets. The proposed street pattern keeps the town house and apartment traffic separate from the proposed and existing single dwellings. 4. The city nor the developer plan to build the proposed collector street between County Road D and Highway 61 because the of the existing and proposed grades, the existing power lines and the existing pipelines make it difficult to build a street in this area. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 2000. 46 Attachment 18 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Frank Frattalone, representing Frattalone Excavating, applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for the Highpoint Ridge residential planned unit development (PUD). WHEREAS, this change applies to undeveloped property for the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D and west of Highway 61. The legal description of these properties are: PID: 04- 29- 22- 12- 0009 -5 Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX E 160 FT THE S 100 FT OF N 358 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 PID: 04- 29- 22 -12- 0008 -2 Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX E 160 FT THE S 202 FT OF N 560 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 PID: 04- 29- 22 -12- 0001 -1 Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 E 100 FT OF N 158 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 PID: 04- 29- 22 -12- 0002 -4 Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX N 158 FT LYING E OF CAREY HEIGHTS DRIVE AS SD DRIVE IS DESC IN DOC NO 1634533; THE N 1443.8 FT OF PART OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LYING ELY OF WLY LINE OF SD DRIVE. ALSO, E 130 FT OF PART OF SD 1 /41 /4 LYING S RN 22 PID: 04- 29- 22 -12- 0010 -5 Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 SUBJ TO CO RD AND WITH RD ESMT AND EX E 160 FT THE N 258 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 PID: 04- 29 -22 -12 -0006 Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 S 100 FT OF N 1044 96/100 FT OF PART WLY OF CL OF RD ESMT IN DOC 1634533 OF E 9 ACRES NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO ES MTS) IN SEC 4, TN 29, RN 22 PID: 04- 29 -22 -11 -0006 Description: ALL THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4), OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, EXCEPT THE EAST 661.6 FEET OF THE NORTH 1,006 FEET, AND SUBJECT TO COUNTY ROAD D, AND SUBJECT TO A GAS PIPELINE EASEMENT LOCATED THEREON PID: 04- 29 -22 -11 -0005 Description: TRACT A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 322, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND THE SOUTH 401.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 1006.00 FEET OR THE EAST 661.80 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, EXCEPT THE NORTH 676.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THENCE WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, 5.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTHERLY 741.30 FEET TO A POINT 15.00 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID 47 NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, 15.00 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE: THENCE NORTH, ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. P I D : 04- 29- 22 -12- 0007 -9 Description: THE SOUTH 224 96/100 FEET OF THE NORTH 834 96/100 FEET OF THE EAST 9 ACRES OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWN 29, RANGE 22, EXCEPT THE EAST 160 FEET THEREOF, TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS BY FOOT AND BY VEHICLE TO AND FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY OVER AND ALONG THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY TO WIT: THE WEST 60 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF THE NORTH 834.96 FEET OF THE EAST 9 ACRES OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22 All in Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On June 19, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the western part of the proposed development for the permit. 2. On July 10, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. 3. On August 14, 2000, the city council again considered this conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 48 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan and preliminary plat date - stamped June 30, 2000, except where the city requires changes. The developer shall revise the grading, utility, tree planting and other project and construction plans to follow the site plan and preliminary plat dated June 30, 2000. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, trails, tree and driveway and parking lot plans. 4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall give the city an easement for this pond and shall be responsible for getting any needed off -site pond and drainage easements. 5. The developer or contractor shall: a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. C. Remove the debris, junk, garbage and travel trailers from the site. 6. This approval does not include the final design approval for the duplexes, townhomes or for the apartment buildings. The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping and site plans for these to the community design review board (CDRB) for approval by the CDRB. 7. The city shall not issue any building permits for construction on an outlot (per city code requirements). The developer must record a final plat to create buildable lots for any outlot in the preliminary plat before the city will issue a building permit. 8. The city council shall review this permit in one year. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 2000. Ell,"] Attachment 19 NO PARKING RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Maplewood has approved a residential PUD and preliminary plat known as Highpoint Ridge. WHEREAS, the developer wants to have reduced street right -of -way widths and reduced street pavement widths in this development. WHEREAS, the city has approved reduced street right -of -way widths and reduced street pavement widths in the development, subject to on- street parking restrictions. WHEREAS, Section 29 -52(b) of the city code allows variations from the city code standards if they do not affect the general purpose of the city code. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that Maplewood prohibits the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of all public streets less than 28 feet wide and prohibits parking on one side of the public streets that are 28 feet to 32 feet wide in the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D and west of Highway 61 in Section 4- 29 -22. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 50 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, JUNE 19 2000 V. PUBLIC HEARING A. Highpoint Ridge (County Road D and Highway 61): Comprehensive Plan Changes —R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) and drop planned minor collector street; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD); Preliminary plat; and No parking for one side of private streets and driveways Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. He answered questions about proposed traffic signals at Lydia and Highway 61 and anticipated traffic patterns in the area. The developer has not presented design plans for the apartment complex. Mr. Roberts thought the density and unit count was important but Commissioner Frost was concerned about the "mass of buildings." Commissioner Trippler commented on the extensive amount of traffic currently at County Road D and Highway 61. Ken Haider, city engineer, said the basis of a long -term plan is to combine the County Road D and 1 -694 ramp traffic into one intersection that crosses Highway 61. He felt additional development at the Maplewood Mall would be the impetus to start this traffic - control project. Mr. Haider spoke about the allowance of u -turns on streets. Mr. Roberts answered questions from Commissioner Mueller on parking for the apartment complex and the affect of an apartment building on property values. He pointed out that the proposed apartment building was fairly well isolated from the existing homes in the area. Frank Frattalone, the developer of the project, described his proposal. He said their traffic plans were submitted to the state for Highway 61 and the county for County Road D and were approved by both. He pointed out that, even though it sounds like a lot of homes, it is "not real dense" for this large of an area. Commissioner Pearson asked if Mr. Frattalone had considered a horseshoe coming down Duluth Street with a cul -de -sac on the west end of Lydia to better distribute traffic. Ken Haider said the basis of the design presented in the area was additional emergency access to the existing development south of this. Mr. Frattalone confirmed that the apartment complex would be two, three -story units. He showed a rendering of the buildings. Mr. Frattalone introduced Todd . Arness who is affiliated with Bruce Mogren and would be one of the owners of the apartment project. Mr. Frattalone was not very receptive to the idea of turning the apartment complex into single - family homes, primarily because of the elevations on the site and the proximity to Highway 61. Todd Arness said this apartment would be "a little bit of an upgrade" from the unit built on Gervais Avenue, west of White Bear Avenue and would have the same ownership. He noted that there will be about 20 one -unit, 80 two -unit, and 20 three -unit apartments with a rent range of $900 41200. He projected that parking required would be a little more than one car per unit. One underground and one surface parking area would be provided for each apartment. Mr. Frattalone stated that an annual income of $41,000 for a family of four would be necessary to qualify for these units. Melinda Coleman, director of community development, cautioned the commission that their role was not to take income of proposed tenants into account when making their decisions. She also said that there was no evidence to indicate that apartment buildings lower property values. According to information she received from the county assessor, a lower value in neighborhoods was more contingent on the age and maintenance of the structures and on the presence of blight, such as junk vehicles. Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 06 -19 -00 The hearing was opened for public participation. Jeff Bradt, 1236 Summit Court, was disappointed in the staff recommendation. He felt it was "insulting" and "arrogant" for staff to write that this development would be beneficial to the nearby existing residential properties. Mr. Bradt had a major concern about the future traffic impact and spoke about the situation that now exists. His apprehension was not about property values but the impact on the "quality of life." Brent Jorgenson (1235 Summit Court), Joyce Lambert (2986 Duluth Street), Kim Esch (2993 Carey Heights Drive), Valerie Bradt (1236 Summit Court), E. Barrett (1176 County Road D), Doug Huntley (3020 Edward Street), Dan Jurgens (1225 Summit Court) and the occupant of 1245 Summit Court spoke about traffic concerns, the impact of the apartment complex on the area. The public hearing portion of the meeting was closed. A short break in the meeting was taken. s Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend the residential development to the west of the existing line between the M -1 zone and the R -1 zone be allowed to occur using a street pattern that would not access Highway 61. It was further recommended, due to traffic access problems to Highway 61, that the existing M -1 zone be maintained or another low - traffic volume development be proposed. If Frank Frattalone, the applicant, wishes to alter the line between the existing M -1 and R -1 zones so that it removes the jog towards the north end, the Planning Commission would agree with that change. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Commissioner Rossbach clarified that his motion meant their would be no access from the residential area through the M -1 zone to Highway 61. The traffic would go down through Duluth Street or Carey Heights Drive. The M -1 line would be straight north /south and would not jog. He confirmed that there would be no R -1 on the south end of the M -1 zone. This proposal says that a development, very similar to the one that is proposed which is to the west of the M-1/R-1 line, would be allowed. Ayes all The motion passed. There was a question as to whether there would be motions on the other items. Mr. Roberts thought there could be action taken on the part of the plat that was west of the "line." Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of Recommendations B, C, and D to be consistent with the motion in A. B. Approve the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the Highpoint Ridge housing development. The city bases this approval on the findings required by code. (Refer to the resolution for the specific findings.) Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans date - stamped May 26, 2000, except where the city requires changes. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 06 -19 -00 plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, trails, tree and driveway and parking lot plans. 4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall give the city an easement for this pond and shall be responsible for getting any needed off -site pond and drainage easements. 5. The developer or contractor shall: a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Remove the debris, junk, garbage and travel trailers from the site. 6. This approval does not include the final design approval for the duplexes, townhomes or for the apartment buildings. The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping and site plans for these to the community design review board (CDRB) for approval by the CDRB. 7. The city shall not issue any building permits for construction on an outlot (per city code requirements). The developer must record a final plat to create buildable lots for any outlot in the preliminary plat before the city will issue a building permit. 8. The city council shall review this permit in one year. C. Approve the Highpoint Ridge preliminary plat (received by the city on May 26, 2000). The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat: 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Have NSP install Group V rate street lights in at least nine locations - primarily at street intersections and street curves. The exact style and location shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. d. Pay the city for the cost of traffic- control, street identification and no parking signs. e. Provide all required and necessary easements. f. Demolish or remove the existing house and garage at 1170 County Road D, and all other buildings, scrap metal, debris and junk from the site. g. Cap and seal all wells on site that the owners are not using; remove septic systems or drainfields, subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines. Within one year of the contractor installing the sanitary sewer, the owners of the existing houses on Carey Heights Drive shall connect their houses to the sanitary sewer. h. Complete all the curb and gutter on Duluth Street and on Carey Heights Drive on the Planning Commission -4- Minutes of 06 -19 -00 south side of the site. This is to replace the temporary cul -de -sac, repair the cul -de -sac pavement and restore and sod the boulevards. 1. For the trails, complete the following: (1) Construct an eight- foot -wide paved walkway and two -rail split -rail fencing between Lets 4 and 5, Block 'I , between the street and the proposed east/west trail in Block 3, and along the north side of the lots in Block One (in the easement area) as shown on the plat date- stamped May 26, 2000. The developer shall extend the west end of the trail in Lot 3, Block One into the city park to connect to the existing park trail. All trails between lots shall be in a 18- foot -wide trailway or pedestrian way or in easement areas. (2) The developer shall install atwo -rail split -rail fence on both sides of each trail and posts at the end of the trails to prevent motorized vehicles from using the trail. (3) The developer shall build the trails and fencing with the streets. (4) The city engineer must approve these plans. j. Install signs where the driveways for the twin homes and for the town houses intersect the public streets indicating that they are private driveways. 2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail, sidewalk and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall show: (1) The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. (3) House pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large trees. (4) The proposed street and trail grades as allowed by the city engineer. (5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. On slopes steeper than 3:1, the developer shall prepare and implement a stabilization and planting plan. At a minimum, the slopes shall be protected with wood fiber blanket, be seeded with a no maintenance vegetation and be stabilized before the city approves the final plat. (6) All retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a building permit from the city. (7) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city engineer. Planning Commission -5- Minutes of 06 -19 -00 (8) No grading beyond the plat boundary without temporary grading easements from the affected property owner(s). (9) A minimum of a 10- foot -wide, 10:1 bench below the normal water elevation (NWL) of any pond designed to be a wet pond. The depth of the pond below the NWL shall not exceed four feet. C.* The tree plan shall: (1) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or final plat approval. (2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site. (3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous trees shall be at least two and one half (2'/2) inches in diameter and shall be a mix of red and white oaks, ash, lindens and sugar maples. The coniferous trees shall be at least eight (8) feet tall and shall be a mix of Austrian pine and other species. (4) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. (5) Include for city staff a detailed planting plan and material list. (6) Be revised to group the new trees together. These planting areas shall be around the ponding areas, on the steep slopes, along the common property lines between residences and along all of the proposed trails. The developer may use the tree groupings to separate the different types of residences. (7) Show the planting of at least 242 trees after the site grading is done. d. The street, trail and utility plans shall show: (1) Paved walkways and two -rail split -rail fences in a trailway or pedestrian way as shown on the proposed plans. This shall include the trail between Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, in Block 3 (as revised), between Block 1 and Block 3 (under the power lines), connecting to the existing park trail to the west of the site and on the east side of English Lane (Ridge Lane) to connect to the proposed apartment site. The parks and recreation director shall approve their locations and design. (2) The public streets shall be a 9 -ton design with a maximum street grade of eight percent and the maximum street grade within 75 feet of all intersections at two .percent. (3) All the streets, parking areas and driveways with continuous concrete curb and gutter. (4) All public street right -of -ways shall be at least 60- feet -wide. (5) The completion of the curb and gutter on the north end of Duluth Street and the existing Carey Heights Drive cul -de -sac, the repair or replacement of the cul -de -sac pavement and the restoration and sodding of the boulevards around the cul -de -sac. (6) A connection between the proposed water main in Block 3 and the proposed water main system on the southerly part of the plat. The developer also shall make a Planning Commission -6- Minutes of 06 -19 -00 connection between the proposed water main on Lydia Avenue at Highway 61 and the existing water main on the west side of Highway 61, south of Guldens. (7) The coordination of the water main alignments and sizing with the standards and requirements of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS). Available fire flow analysis shall be determined for the water system at the proposed apartment complex as well as through the existing 8 -inch and 12 -inch crossings of Highway 61 at Beam Avenue. Fire flow requirements shall be verified with the Maplewood Fire Department. (8) All utility excavations located within the proposed right -of -ways or within easements. The developer shall acquire easements for all utilities that would be outside the project area. (9) A reduced number of sanitary and storm sewer manholes and water main bends by "cutting corners" with the utility alignments. The developer's engineer shall verify with the SPRWS the acceptable water main alignments and crossings. Manholes may be offset from the street centerline if the result lessens the number of structures. (10) Provisions for public utilities and service(s) to the vacant or undeveloped properties on the south side of the proposed Lydia Avenue. e. The drainage plan shall ensure that there is no increase in the rate of storm water run -off leaving the site above the current (predevelopment) levels. 3. Change the plat as follows: a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. c. Revise the lot lines in Block One and Block Three so there is a 18- foot -wide trail or pedestrian way between Lots 4 and 5, Block One and between Lots 6 and 7 or between Lots 8 and 9, Block Three to accommodate the proposed trails. d. Show the existing pipeline and the NSP and pipeline easements on the final plat. e. Show all public street right -of -ways at 60 feet wide. f. Make as many of the property lines as is reasonably possible radial to the cul -de -sacs or perpendicular to the street right -of -ways. g. If necessary, increase the lot widths for the lots next to the pipeline to ensure that the house pads will be at least 100 feet away from the pipeline. (code requirement) h. Change the street names as follows: 1. Carey Heights Drive shall be used only in Block 2 (Phase One) of the project. The north /south street between Outlot A and Outlot B shall be Duluth Street. 2. Highpoint Court shall be called Ridge Place. Planning Commission -7- Minutes of 06 -19 -00 3. English Lane shall be called Ridge Lane. 4. The cul -de -sac in Block 3 shall be called Highridge Court. I. Show the extra ten -feet of street right -of -way for County Road D. 4. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including: a. Any off -site drainage and utility easements. b. Any necessary easements for the dedication and construction of Lydia Avenue.. 5. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. 6. Record the following with the final plat: a. All homeowners association documents. b. A deed restriction prohibiting the construction of a dwelling or its attachments within 100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline. This affects Lots 3 through 6, Block 1 and Lots 7 through 18, Block 3 of the proposed preliminary plat the city received on May 26, 2000. The developer also shall notify the purchasers of the pipeline location. c. A deed dedicating 10 feet of additional right -of -way along County Road D for future street widening with the final plat. The applicant shall submit the language for this dedication to the city for approval before recording. d. A covenant or deed restriction with the final plat that prohibits the driveways on Lots 1, 23 24, 25, 26, and 36, Block 3 from going onto County Road D. e. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision or splitting of the lots or parcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless approved by the city council. The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the city for approval before recording. 7. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading. 8. The owners of the properties at 1174 and 1176 County Road D shall change the addresses of their properties to Carey Heights Drive addresses within 30 days of the contractor installing the base bituminous course for the new public street in front of their homes. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. Planning Commission -8- Minutes of 06 -19 -00 D. Adopt the resolution which is for the on- street parking standards and no on- street parking requirements for the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D and west of Highway 61. Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Ayes The motion passed. S- aZ AGENDA REPORT Introduction Amusement City has operated a paintball facility in the City f Maplewood contra to Y p contrary City ordinance. At its July 10, 2000, meeting, the City Council directed staff to research possible revisions to the ordinance. Background The current ordinance says that discharge of fire g rms, including air- or gas-propelled p ro p guns, is prohibited. Paintball guns currently fall under this provision. The City of Eagan does have a code that covers paintball guns and facilities. Recommendation Attached is the current Maplewood code with regard to weapons, the current Eagan code with regard to paintball guns and facilities, and suggested revisions to our ordinance. It is recommended that the City Council review this ordinance and adopt it if they wish to allow paintball guns and facilities in the City of Maplewood. Action Reauired Submit to the City Council for review and action. DSW :js .Attachments Action by Council To: Actin City Manager Ken Hai er Acting Y g . Date From: Chief Donald Winger e5 7 1 indorsed _00 ft Subject: Paintball Guns and Facilities Modified Date: July 27 2000 Rejected Introduction Amusement City has operated a paintball facility in the City f Maplewood contra to Y p contrary City ordinance. At its July 10, 2000, meeting, the City Council directed staff to research possible revisions to the ordinance. Background The current ordinance says that discharge of fire g rms, including air- or gas-propelled p ro p guns, is prohibited. Paintball guns currently fall under this provision. The City of Eagan does have a code that covers paintball guns and facilities. Recommendation Attached is the current Maplewood code with regard to weapons, the current Eagan code with regard to paintball guns and facilities, and suggested revisions to our ordinance. It is recommended that the City Council review this ordinance and adopt it if they wish to allow paintball guns and facilities in the City of Maplewood. Action Reauired Submit to the City Council for review and action. DSW :js .Attachments 120 -57 MAPLEWOOD CODE Secs. 20- 57-- 20 -70. Reserved. ARTICLE IV. WEAPONS AND EXPLOSIVES* Sec. 20 -71. Definition. The words "pistol or revolver," as used in this article, shall be construed as meaning any firearm with a barrel less than twelve (12) inches in length. (Code 1965, § 1210.050) Cross reference —Rules of construction and definitions generally, 1 -41 et seq. Sec. 20 -72. Exemptions from article. This article shall not apply to police officers or other authorized personnel when using firearms or other weapons in the regular course of performing their duties. (Code 1965, § 1206.050) Sec. 20 -73. Discharge of firearms, including air or gas propelled guns; possession or detonation of explosives, fireworks, etc. (a) It shau be unlawful for any person to shoot or discharge any gun, revolver, pistol or firearms of any kind or description, includ- ing BB guns, pellet and air guns, spring guns, or air or gas propelled guns, including CO guns, within the city, whether the same be .loaded with powder and ball, live ammunition or blank cartridges, or any kind of explosive or propellant capable of throwing or pro- jecting any missile, including bullets, pellets, BB's, artillery shells, rockets or other missiles. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person in the city to have in his possession or to shoot, discharge or explode any preparation of potash, mixture of sulphur and saltpeter, nitroglycerin, dynamite, plastic explosive, fireworks or any other kind of explosive material, and -all such acts are hereby prohibited, unless specifically author- ized by permit issued by the department of public safety or by permit issued by the state department of conservation. (Code 1965, § 1206.010; Ord. No. 241, § 1, 7 -1 -68) *.State law reference — Sundry crimes relating to weapons and explosives, M.S. .1 609.66 et seq. 1246 CURRENT MAPLEWOOD ORDINANCE EAGAN CITY CODE Sec, 6.46. Paintball sport facility, Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this section, shall have the meanings stated: A. Paintball means a round, thin- skinned gelatin capsule filled with a nontoxic, noncaustic, water - soluble and biodegradable colored liquid specifically designed and manufactured to be expelled from a paintball gun. B. Paintball facility means any building, structure or location at which a paintball game is played. C. Paintball game means a game or sport, for adult recreational purposes, of which the objective is to tag opposing players with a paintball expelled or discharged from a paintball gun. D. Paintball gun means a gun frorn which 0.68. caliber paintballs are expelled by the use of CO2 pressure set for a maximum velocity of 250 feet per second. Su6d. 2 Ucense required. It is unlawful for any person to operate a paintball facility without first obtaining a license therefor from the city. Subd. 3. License application. All applications for a license for the operation of a paintball facility shall be made on a form furnished by the city which states, among other things, the name and address of the applicant, the owner and operator of the paintball feciiity, the name and address of the paintball facility, and the approval of the fire marshal and police chief of the paintball facility. Subd. 4. Licensing requirements. No license shall be issued hereunder unless the following conditions are met, and any license issued hereunder shall be subject to the following conditions: X The paintball facility shall provide solely for indoor paintball games; no paintball game shall be played outdoors. B. It is unlawful to discharge or otherwise fire a paintball gun except on an indoor paintball field while engaged in a paintball game. C. it is unlawful to discharge or otherwise fire a paintball gun at another person who is not equipped with protective face gear as approved by International Paintball Players Association (IPPA). D. It is unlawful - for any* person . under 14 years 'of age, or any person 14 or 15 years of age without the accompaniment of a parent or guardian, to participate in any paintball game or be in possession of any paintball gun on the licensed premises. E, it is unlawful to carry a paintball gun while off the paintball field without the barrel plug engaged. ' F. Paint guns not meeting the definition set forth . in subdivision 1 herein are prohibited on the licensed premises. • G. The paintball field on which the paintball game is played shall be at a minimum of 7,000 square feet and completely enclosed by plexiglass. H. The licensee shall provide all persons engaged in a paintball game with Protective gear as recommended and approved by the IPPA►. CURRENT EAOAN ORDINANCE I. It is unlawful to allow alcohol on the licensed remises, and the license s P e hall prohibit any person reasonably believed to be under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance from playing paintball on the premises. Subd. 5. Noncompliance. Failure to comply with an licensing requirement set forth v 9 4 ,n this section or any other violation of the City Code shalt constitute sufficient cause for the termination of the license by the council following a public hearing. - (Ord. No. 170, 2nd series, eff. 10- 29 =93) $ 20 -57 MAPLEWOOD CODE Secs. 20- 57-- 20 -70, Reserved, ARTICLE IV. WEAPONS AND EXPLOSIVES* . COSINES * Sec. 20 -71. Definition. The words "pistol or revolver," as used in • this article, shall be construed as meaning any firearm with a barrel less than twelve 12 inches in length. (Code 1965 _ , § 1210.050) Cross reference —Rules of construction and derwitione enerall 8 y, $1-41 et Seq. Sec. 2042. Exemptions from article. This article shall not apply to olice officers fivers or other authorized personnel when using firearms or other weapons in p the regular course of performing their - duties. (Code 1965, § 1206.050) This article ' shall not amyl. T to paintball jauns and approved paintball facilities. Sec. 20 -73. Discharge of firearms including ding air or gas Propelled guns; possession or detonation o explosives fir f fireworks, etc. (a) It shad be unlawful for any person to shoot or discharge any gun, revolver, pistol or firearms of any kind or description, ' includ- ing BB guns, pellet and air guns, spring guns, or air or gas propelled guns, including CO guns, within the city, whether the same be loaded with powder and ball, live ammunition or blank cartridges or any kind of explosive or propellant capable of throwing jetting any missile, including ull or pro - g ets, pellets, BB's, artillery shells, rockets or other missiles. (b) It shall be unlawful for any Person in the city to have in his possession ' or to shoot, discharge or explode an preparation re of sulphur Y pr paration of potash, mixture p and. saltpeter, nitroglycerin, dynamite, plastic explosive, fireworks or any other kind of e • . explosive material, and all such acts are hereby prohibited, unless specifically author- ized by permit issued by the de permit i department of public safety or by p issued by the state department of conservation. (Code 1 1206.010.Ord. 1965, No. 241, § 1, 7 -1 -68) *state Yaw reference - .Sundry yes rely • to we$ • i 609.66 et seq. pone and explosives, M.S. 1246 PROPOSED MAPLEWOOD ORDINANCE EAGAN CITE' CODE • M•M • • • • M•M. • M • • •. Y M • Sec. 6.46. paintball sport facility, Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this section, shall have the meanings stated: A. Paintball means a round, thin- skinned gelatin capsule filled with a nontoxic, noncaustic, water - soluble and biodegradable colored liquid specifically designed and manufactured to be expelled from a paintball gun. B. Paintball facility means any building, structure or location at which a paintball game is played. co Paintball game means a game or sport, for recreational purposes, of which the objective is to tag opposing players with a paintball expelled or discharged from a paintball gun. D. Paintball gun means .a gun from which- elef paintballs are expelled by the use of Co . and /or as defined by the International Paintball Players Association IPPA). Subd. 2 License required. It is unl awt ul tar any person t operate a pain mall acility without fi obtaining a license therefor from the city. Subd. 3. License application. All applications for a license for the operation of a paintball facility shall be made on a form furnished by the city which states, among other things, the name and address of the applicant, the owner and operator of the paintball facility, the name and address of the paintball facility, and the approval of the fire marshal and police chief of the paintball facility. Subd. 4. Licensing requirements. No license shall be issued hereunder unless the_ following conditions are met, and any license issued hereunder shall be subject to the following conditions: A. The ty-shea y-fef . B. It is unlawful to discharge or otherwise fire a paintball gun except on an rtn�eere- paintball field while engaged in a paintball game. C, It is unlawful to discharge or otherwise fire a paintball gun at another person who is not equipped with protective face gear as approved by lntemational Paintball Players Association D. It is unlawful for any person under 14 years of age, or any person 14 or 15 years o f age without the accompaniment of a parent or guardian, to participate In any paintball game or be in possession of any paintball gun on the licensed premises. E. it is unlawful to carry a paintball gun whsle off -the paintball - field without the barrel plug engaged. ' F. Paint guns not meeting the definition set forth .in subdivision 1 herein are prohibited on the licensed premises. . G, �#�e -p f�#�el�d- eftwhicTr the- palbaH--g$rrte- fs-�d-1°raN- tie-- e#- a- �IUM-ef- � -fe ar - pert ase� glass: - H. The licensee shall provide all persons engaged in a paintball game with protective gear as recommended and approved by the IPPA. PROPOSED MAPLEWOOD ORDINANCE I. it is unlawful to allow alcohol on the licensed premises, and the licensee shall prohibit any person reasonably believed to be under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance from playing paintball on the premises. Subd. 5. Noncompliance. Failure to comply with any licensing requirement set forth in this section or any other violation of the City code shall constitute sufficient cause for the termination of the license by the council following a public hearing. (Ord. No. 170, 2nd series, eff. 10- 29 -93) J -,3 Action by Council Date To: Ken Haider Actin City. Manager g ty . M oed i i W 0- From: Colleen J. Callahan RejwW MEMOMHDUM Subject: Deer. Management Code Addition Date: August 4, 2000 INTRODUCTION City staff is proposing an addition to Chapter 7 ANIMALS AND FOWL of City Code. P ty This proposed addition is in conjunction and in support of the "Deer Management Plan" adopted by City. Council. Background On May 22, 2000 the City Council approved a 5 year Deer Management Plan. This management plan incorporated many methods for reducing and managing deer populations at appropriate acceptable levels for the available habitat and social tolerance. In order to support and enforce the plan code additions are necessar Recommendation Review and approve the code additions on a e two. This code addition will support the P g PP deer management plan approved by City Council on May 22. ■ ORDINANCE NO. Attachment 1 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING CHAPTER 7; ADDING ARTICLE VII: DEER MANAGEMENT The Maplewood City Council approves the following additions to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: Chapter 7 Sections 7- 215 - -7 -220 Reserved Article VII. DEER MANAGEMENT - Sec. 7 -221. Prohibiting feeding of deer It shall be unlawful for any person or group to place, or permit to be placed on the ground or within four 4 feet of the ground surface,, either on property owned or controlled by such person or on property owned by others, unless it is screened in a manner which prevents deer from feeding thereon, any grain, fodder, salt licks or any other food including feed for birds, which may reasonably be expected to result in, deer feeding thereon. (a) Exceptions 1. Feeding programs or efforts undertaken by to City of Maplewood in accordance with deer management lan or b y the Department of Natural Resources for same; p 2. Veterinarians, City animal control officers or county, state or federal game officials who, in the course of their duties have deer in their custody; and 3.' Any food places upon the property for the purpose of entrapping or otherwise taking deer where such trapping or talon pP g g is pursuant to a permit issued by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Sec. 7 -222 Regulations No person shall, within the limits of the City, hunt or engage in the business of deer removal, unless such erson shall be actin on the p g City's behalf and obtained a special permit in conjunction with the City of Maplewood's Deer Management Program. Sec. 7 -223 Application of the deer management program. (a) Every person desiring to be part of our deer management program (archery hunt or sharpshooting) must become a member of Metro Bow Hunters Resource Base (MBRB). (b) Sharpshooting (rifles), may be utilized, and organizations desiring to provide these services will be required to submit bids annually. Sec. 7 -224 Violations of Article or rules, obstruction of deer management program or order of City council; etc. (a) No person shall obstruct or interfere with the City's authorized deer management program or threaten, intimidate, obstruct or interfere with any authorized deer management program or agent providing such services to the City of Maplewood. (b) No person shall touch, damage, manipulate, disengage, make inoperative; or otherwise tamper with a deer trap or other deer removal equipment or material which is being used as part of the City's authorized deer management program. (c) No person shall be within 100 feet of a deer trap or other deer removal equipment or material being used as part of the City's authorized deer management program unless the person is on land which he /she owns or has the express permission of the City, the City's authorized agent, or the owner of the property where the trap or removal equipment or material is located. (d) No person shall enter any area which the City or County has closed to the public as part of the City's authorized deer management program if the City has provided notice of such closure by conspicuously posted signs or other reasonable means. Sec. 7 -225 Violations and Penalties. (a) Any person violating, or otherwise refusing to comply with any provisions of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subsequent penalties shall apply. Sec. 7 -226 This ordinance shall take effect after the City publishes it in the official paper. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on , 2000. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes - Nays - AGENDA ITEM K AGENDA REPORT Action by Council Date Endorsed TO: City Manager Modified Rejected FROM: Assistant City Engineer ineer SUBJECT: Authorize Budget to Correct Sod Work From 1997 Gervais Avenue Project DATE: August 7, 2000 Gervais Avenue was reconstructed during the summer of 1997 under the Gervais Avenue Improvements, Project 96 -02. The boulevards were restored and sodded in the fall of 1997. The sod work was completed according to the requirements of the project specifications. Mn /DOT and city specifications require that the sod be acceptably placed and maintained for the first 30 days. During the 30 -day warranty period, the sod was in very good condition, as well as during the spring and early summer of 1998. As the summer of 1998 proceeded, it appeared that the sod was becoming somewhat "stressed," most likely due to the dry conditions. By 1999, it had appeared that a large amount of the sod had died in a number of areas along the project. By late summer 1999, the boulevards were generally looking poor with weeds basically the only thing growing in many of the yards. Since that time, a few individuals have actually tilled up and reseeded their yards; however, there is still a considerable amount of the boulevard area in poor condition. The boulevards are not in a condition that one would expect to see after so much time and money had been invested into the Gervais Avenue improvements. During standard street improvement projects, disturbance of the boulevard and sod restoration is expected within the city's public right -of -way. The engineering department also provides residents with information on sod care. Some problems with the sod are anticipated over time due to a number of variables (sun, water, and soil conditions). It is expect that each property owner be responsible after the 30 -day warranty period to ensure that the sodded areas are maintained in a manner that meets their expectations. The situation with the Gervais Avenue project seems to go beyond the usual problems. These problem areas are on a rather large scale. Test have been taken of the soil chemistry, but there does not seem to be any factor that stands out as a problem. The contractor had done the work within the guidelines of the project specifications and there is no warranty beyond the 30 -day maintenance period for this work. Project 96 -02 2 August 7, 2000 Because this situation seems to be unique, we would propose to have the problem areas corrected by a combination of sodding, seeding, fertilizer and weed control in the various problem areas. The attached quote is from the subcontractor who will be doing the sodding and landscaping work on the current Hazelwood Street improvement project adjacent to this area. The proposal is on a unit basis, as these are estimated quantities. This work would be done at the same time and in conjunction with the Hazelwood project. If the city council agrees with the above oproposal, staff, would notify each potential resident of the pending corrective work. The contractor would likely begin sometime around the end of August. Staff recommends that the city council authorize a not -to- exceed budget of $4280 for the above - referenced work and to authorize the Finance Director to make the necessary appropriations for funding this work. CIVIC 07/08/00 SAT 119' 05 FAX 651 454 5052 r 18400 Lexington Ave. Wyoming, Minnesota 55092 612 - 464 -8026 JO B QUOTATION T'c '�'AL . $4280.0 0 Dias 7-21- L l ty C;; LAKE5 LAKE LANT.19, GA P ING EY Gary Hole 001 JOB LOCATION: Bill Priebe C¢rvaiS Ave nue City of Maplewood Maplewo Ufft JOB NOW CONTRACT UN IT SPEC. M . OR ITFE QUANTITY UNIT PR T t�; TOTAL s odding Rem told S And TO S9i 2 Insta N ew Sod And Tops Soil 1200( + -) sy $3.00 $3600.00 +_ c lit* Seed and 10 -0 -20 F ertili ze r 0 a cre L UM P Sum 680 T'c '�'AL . $4280.0 0 Dias 7-21- L l ty C;; LAKE5 LAKE LANT.19, GA P ING EY Gary Hole 001 AGENDA ITEM ftoe 3 AGENDA REPORT Action by Council Date TO: Acting City Manager Endorsed M(Wed FROM: City Engineer Rejected.. SUBJECT: Cooperative Agreement Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Project 99 -02 DATE: August 7, 2000 At their last meeting, the city council awarded the bid for replacement of Lift Station 9 with a gravity sewer system. Part of that project is to construct a meter station for the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. The attached agreement identifies the responsibilities of the City of Maplewood and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. The agreement stipulates the City of Maplewood, through its consultant, will design and, through its contractor, construct a meter station for the Metropolitan Council. For their part the Metropolitan Council agrees to pay Maplewood the cost of engineering and construction for the meter station. According to the bid, the construction cost is $65,500, with an engineering fee of $9,720. The total amount being $75,220. It is recommended the city council approved the attached agreement and authorize the appropriate city officials to execute the documents. KGH jc Attachment Agreement No. CONSTRUCTION COOPERATION AGREEMENT THIS CONSTRUCTION COOPERATION AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2000, by and between the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "Maplewood," and the METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "Council." RECITALS 1. Maplewood is constructing a new gravity sewer line in the vicinity of Larpenteur Avenue — extending south along the Canadian Pacific Railway into St. Paul -- to replace an existing forcemain and lift station ( "Maplewood Project "). See attached Exhibit A. 2. On account of the Maplewood Project wastewater will no longer pass through Council meter M -015, and said meter will have to be replaced in order for the Council to continue to measure the flow of Maplewood's wastewater. 3. Council staff has determined that it would be more efficient for Maplewood to include the replacement of meter M -015 into the Maplewood Project than it would be for the Council to undertake the work itself. AGREEMENT I . Maplewood agrees to incorporate the design and construction of a new meter vault, meter, driveway apron and other related appurtenances ( "Meter Facility ") into the Maplewood Project. 2. The Council agrees to provide Maplewood with the preliminary design (to Council standards) of the Meter Facility to be included as a bid item in the Maplewood Project. 3. Maplewood agrees to set up a separate phase number with its consulting engineer, Howard R. Green Company, to itemize the costs for completion of the professional engineering services necessary for the design of the Meter Facility. See attached Exhibit B for the estimated cost of the profession engineering services. Agreement No. 4. Maplewood agrees to obtain an easement for the Meter Facility from the Maplewood Park Board and agrees to transfer said easement to the Council (at no cost to the Council) after the Project is complete. 5. Maplewood agrees to construct the Meter Facility as part of the Maplewood Project. 6. The Council agrees to appoint Maplewood as its agent to prepare the final construction documents, to advertise for bids for the work and construction of the Maplewood Project, to receive and open bids, to enter into a contract with a successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder and to construct the Maplewood Project in accordance with plans and specifications designated as Maplewood Project which are on file with City of Maplewood. Said construction documents are made a part hereof with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein. See attached Exhibit C. 7. Maplewood agrees that it will include a separate line item for each component of the Meter in its Request for Bid. 8. Maplewood agrees that once it has received and opened bids for the Maplewood Project that it will provide copies of the bids to the Council for its review and approval. 9. Maplewood agrees to administer the contract and inspect the construction of the contract work included in the Maplewood Project. The work may be inspected periodically throughout the Maplewood Project by the Council's Authorized Representative', but the Council's Authorized Representative will not have responsibility for the supervision of the work. If the Council reasonably determines that the work has not been constructed substantially in accordance with the construction documents, the Council through its Authorized Representative, shall inform the Project Engineer in writing of such defects. Maplewood agrees to require its Contractor to make the corrections and/or meet the requirements of the construction documents requested by Council through its authorized representative. ' The term "Authorized Representative" means the person designated in writing by the General Manager of the Office of Wastewater Services of the Council's Environmental Division. --2-- Agreement No. All work shall be performed in substantial accordance with the approved construction documents. Maplewood's Project Engineer will inform the Council in writing of completion of construction of the Maplewood Project. Within a reasonable time thereafter, the Council will inform Maplewood in writing either that the Maplewood Project as constructed conforms to the construction documents approved by the Council or that the Maplewood Project does not conform to the approved construction documents. The Council will further inform Maplewood of the specific reasons for non - conformance to the construction documents and what steps, in the opinion of the Council, must be taken by Maplewood to make the Maplewood Project conform to the construction documents. The final decision on conformance of the Maplewood Project to the construction documents will be made by the Council. Evidence of acceptance of the Maplewood Project will be in writing by letter form the Council's General Manager of the Office of Wastewater Services of the Council's Environmental Division. The Council will not unreasonably withhold acceptance of the Maplewood Project. 10. Not less than seven (7) days prior to commencement of the Maplewood Project, Maplewood agrees to give written notice to the Council of its intention to commence construction. Said notice shall be directed to: General Manager - Wastewater Services Metropolitan Council - Wastewater Services 230 East 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 11. Maplewood agrees to submit any amendments to or material changes in the approved Maplewood Project final construction documents, including the construction schedule, to the Council for its review and approval. Such amendments to the approved final construction documents and/or changes in the construction schedule must be submitted to Council's project manager at least fifteen (15) days prior to the implementation of any such change. Maplewood agrees that it will not proceed with any amendment to or change in the approved final construction documents or construction schedule of the Maplewood Project until the Council has consented to any such change in writing as evidenced by letter to Maplewood from the Council's Authorized Representative. -- 3 __ Agreement No. 12. The Council may require Maplewood to make changes to or modifications in the scope of the Maplewood Project and Maplewood agrees to construct such required modifications or changes, provided however, that the entire cost of such change or modification shall be borne by the Council. 13. Upon acceptance of the Maplewood Project by Council as provided for in Paragraph 9 of this Agreement, and upon delivery of the record drawings as provided for in Paragraph 20 of this Agreement, the Council agrees to reimburse Maplewood for the Maplewood Project in the amount of $ aka ° , which figure includes $-6 for the work to be performed by Maplewood's contractor and $ o for engineering fees. Also, the Council agrees to reimburse Maplewood for any change orders or modifications approved by or requested by the Council in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 14. All direct payments to the Contractor for work performed on the Maplewood Project will be made by Maplewood. 15. The Council agrees to reimburse Maplewood in the amount provided in Paragraph 13 minus the holdback as provided for in this paragraph within thirty (30) days of submittal to the Council of an invoice showing the costs for the Maplewood Project and written evidence of payment to contractors and subcontractors including written receipts of such payments from contractors and subcontractors. Maplewood will not bill the Council for any amount it holds back from its contractors and subcontractors until such amount becomes due and payable to Maplewood's contractors and subcontractors. Maplewood agrees that the holdback from its contractors and subcontractors shall be at least 5%. Any holdback shall be paid upon submission to the Council by Maplewood of a final invoice upon completion of the Maplewood Project and acceptance of the Project by the Council in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Council shall have thirty (30) days from the receipt of said invoice to review and contest the amount due. The amount due shall be final, binding and conclusive upon expiration of the aforesaid thirty day examination period unless the Council has contested the amount pursuant to this paragraph. 16. In the event any items of an invoice are contested, the uncontested portions of the invoice shall be paid in accordance with the normal 30-day period and the contested items shall be paid within 30 MKI'm Agreement No. days of resolution of the matter. In the event the construction documents are amended in accordance with Paragraph 12 of this Agreement which results in an increase in the contract amount, the Council hereby agrees to remit the Council's share as documented in the supplemental agreement or change order upon completion of the Maplewood Project and acceptance of the Maplewood Project by the Council in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and submittal to the Council of an invoice showing the amount of the supplemental agreement or change order. 17. Maplewood agrees to obtain and bear all costs for obtaining all applicable permits and easements necessary for the Maplewood Project. Upon completion of construction of the Maplewood Project and acceptance of the Maplewood Project by the Council pursuant to this Agreement, Maplewood agrees to transfer such permits and easements to the Council. 18. Maplewood agrees to instruct its contractor to salvage meter M -015 and the RTU enclosure and delivered both to the Council. See Exhibit E page 02050 -3. 19. Maplewood's agrees to prepare monthly progress reports as provided in the approved final construction documents for the Maplewood Project and will furnish a copy to the Council's Authorized Representative. 20. All records kept by the Council and Maplewood with respect to this Maplewood Project shall be subject to examination by the representative of each party hereto. Within ninety (90) calendar days of completion of the Construction of the Maplewood Project by Maplewood and acceptance of the Project by the Council as provided in this Agreement, Maplewood agrees to provide the Council a complete set of reproducible record drawings of the Maplewood Project. 21. Upon completion of construction of the Maplewood Project and acceptance of the Maplewood Project by the Council as provided by this Agreement, the Maplewood Project and all warranties and guarantees provided by the construction contractors and subcontractors associated with the Maplewood Project shall become the property of the Council. 22. All employees of Maplewood and all other persons engaged by Maplewood in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by Maplewood shall --5-- Agreement No. not be considered employees of the Council, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the state of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged, on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the Council. 23. It is further agreed that any and all employees of the Council and all other persons engaged by the Council in the performance of any work or services required or provided herein to be performed by the Council shall not be considered employees of Maplewood, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Minnesota Economic Security Law of behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission of the part of said employees while so engaged , on any work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of Maplewood. 24. Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts, errors, and omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law, and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. Maplewood and the Council's liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. 25. Maplewood and the Council each warrant that each party is able to comply with the aforementioned indemnity requirements through an insurance or self - insurance program and have minimum coverage consistent with the liability limits contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. 26. Maplewood agrees that any contract let by Maplewood for the performance of Maplewood Project as provided herein shall include clauses that will: 1) Require the Contractor to defend, indemnify, and save harmless the Council, its members, officers, agents and employees from claims, suits, demands, damages, judgments, costs, interest, expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees, witness fees and disbursements incurred in the defense thereof) arising out of or by reason of the negligence of the said Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors; 2) Require the Contractor to provide and maintain insurance as provided on Exhibit D attached to and made a part of Agreement No. this Agreement and to provide to Council prior to commencement of construction a Certificate of Insurance evidencing the insurance coverage required in Exhibit D and naming Council as additional insured; and 3) Require the Contractor to be an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the work provided for in this Agreement. 27. Applicable provisions of Minnesota of federal law and of any applicable local ordinances relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action Policy statements of Maplewood and the Council shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. Specifically, Maplewood agrees to comply with all federal, state and local applicable laws and ordinances relating to nondiscrimination, affirmative action, public purchases, contracting, employment, including workers' compensation and surety deposits required for construction contracts. Maplewood agrees to request payment of state labor wage information from its contractor and provide such information to the Council. 28. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and deemed to be part of this Agreement. 29. Any alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. 30. The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable. If any part of this Agreement is rendered void, invalid, or unenforceable, such rendering shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement unless the part or parts which are void, invalid or otherwise unenforceable shall substantially impair the value of the entire Agreement with respect to the parties. One or more waivers by said party of any provision, term, condition or covenant shall not be construed by the other party as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same by the other party. 31. All records kept by the Council and Maplewood with respect to the Maplewood Project shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each party hereto. All data collected, created, --7-- Agreement No. received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose by the activities of Maplewood and the Council pursuant to this Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, as amended, and the Minnesota Rules implementing such Act now in force or hereafter adopted. 32. The covenants of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. 33. Any notice or demand, which may or must be given or made by a party hereto, under the terms of this Agreement or any statute or ordinance, shall be in writing and shall be sent certified mail or delivered in person to the other party addressed as follows: Metropolitan Council Environmental Services c/o William Moore, General Manager, Wastewater Services Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101-1634 Maplewood 34. Maplewood agrees to certify and require its contractors and subcontractors to certify to the Council that: No federal appropriated funds received pursuant to this Agreement have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the Council, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer of employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. If any funds or other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this Agreement, Maplewood, its contractors and subcontractors shall complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure Form to Reporting Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. --8-- Agreement No. 35. This Contract is entered into in and under the laws of the State of Minnesota and shall be interpreted in accordance therewith. 36. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon giving of thirty (30) days advanced written notice to the other party for reasons on nonperformance or documented unsatisfactory performance by the other party. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have. caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Approved as to Form: By Its METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By Its Legal Council Approved as to Form: Office of General Counsel AGENDA NO. K`OT Action by Council Date AGENDA REPORT Endorsed - Modified _ Rejec TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director R RE: 2001 Proposed Budget DATE: August 4,2000 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS The 2001 Proposed Budget prepared under the direction of Ken Haider, Acting City Manager, recommends a tax levy for 2001 that is 16.6% higher than 2000. The large tax increase is primarily due to a smaller surplus balance available for next year's budget, an increase in public safety dispatching costs due to termination of the contract with Ramsey County and payments on the Fire Safety Bond issue approved at the November, 1999 referendum. City taxes this year on an average home were $306 and 20% of the total. The proposed tax levy for 2001 will increase city taxes on an average home approximately $51. The exact amount will not be available until Ramsey County send notices to each homeowner in mid - November. Utility rates for sewer and recycling services will be increased by 14.1 % in the 2001 Budget. This will cause the quarterly utility bill on an average home to increase from $42.05 this year to $48.00 next year. Sewer rates will be increased because most of the surplus in the Sanitary Sewer Fund has been eliminated as planned when the rates were decreased by 22.4% this year. Recycling charges are being increased because of higher recycling costs and costs for adding a second city wide "Clean Up Day ". It is important to note that the quarterly sewer and recycling charges for next year are less than 1999 when they totaled $51.44. The 2001 Proposed Budget will maintain the level of services provided by all departments. Proposed expenditures for operations in 2001 are $25.9 million which is 4.4% more than this year. This is higher than the anticipated inflation rate for next year due to city growth and because of an increase in public safety dispatching costs due to termination of the contract with Ramsey County. The number of full -time employees included in the 2001 Budget is 156. Thirteen positions have been added and three positions have been eliminated. Nine positions have been added due to the transfer of the dispatching function from Ramsey County. The other new positions include a police officer, recreation program assistant (replaces two part -time positions), open space naturalist (previously a half -time position ) and a mechanic (replaces a part -time position). The three positions which have been eliminated are an accountant, building custodian, and community service officer. Proposed expenditures next year for capital improvements are $2.9 million which is $2.8 million less than this year. The capital improvements portion of the budget covers the acquisition and construction of major facilities other than those financed by the Operating Budget. Proposed expenditures next year for debt service are $2.9 million which is 6.6% more than this year after adjusting for payments on bonds that were refinanced. The total proposed expenditures next year for operations, capital improvements and debt service are $31.7 million which is 9.3% less than this year. SCHEDULE FOR BUDGET REVIEW AND ADOPTION State law specify deadlines for certain Council actions related to the 2001 Budget. These are as follows: September 15 - proposed tax levy for 2001 and budget hearing dates must be certified to Ramsey County October 20 - if the proposed tax levy for 2001 will result in a tax rate increase, a public hearing must be held and a resolution must be approved and sent to Ramsey County December 20 - budget and tax levy hearings must be completed December 28 -final tax levy for 2001 must be certified to Ramsey County ACTION REQUIRED It has been past practice to schedule a special City Council meeting to review the budget, approve a proposed tax levy and set budget hearing dates prior to the September 15 deadline. It is requested that a special City Council meeting for this purpose be scheduled for one of the following times: Wednesday, September 6 at 5:00 p.m. Thursday, September 7 at 4:45 p.m. Tuesday, September 12 at 5:00 p.m. P: \FINANCE \WP\AGN \01 BUDGET.WPD AGENDA NQ�____ Julie Lagerswm JUL 0 5 2000 2572 Oakridge Court Maplewood, MN 55119 (651) 501 -1733 phone Action by Council (651) 501 -1740 fax Date Endorsed Modified Rejected June 30,20W Karen Guilfale Mapl evwod City Hall 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Ms. Guilfoile: am a resident of the Beth Heights area in South Maplewood and am writing to you on behalf of my neighborhood to address the issue of the Ramsey Courtly shooting facility that is located off of Linwood Avenue. We would like the opporturity to discuss the unsuitable location of the facility at a City Council Meeting. To my knowledge, the facility is one of tow used by the St. Paul and Maplewood Police De et 'ce• the facility. � Departments for target . p!� , other faality. is indoors and is used during the winter months. The facility on Unwood is in operation the hours of lam and 5 Monday t y Pm y rough Fnday and occasionally on weekends. The facility has been in eAstence since the 1960s; when this area was undeveloped Now developed, the facility lies in the middle of several residential neighborhoods and is only y a coup hundred feet from homes and apa rtments. Many residents are home during the hours of operation including people with *children and people off icing out of their homes. The shooting. facility is a concern for us as residents for several reasons. Most obvious the constant sound of gun shots from the range is annoying and eerie. More im portantly, bullet from the the possibility of just one stray facility, wh is surrounded by only a chain- linked fence. or - -the _ r_i_sk-- of - - ,a-- -child _ -- wondering into the facility's. open gates, could be detrimental to our community. Finally, we take 'de in the natural* beauty and serene of Maplewood and f y area. serenity pl eel that the range has a negative impact on the Please let me know when this issue can be brought up,to the City Council. Your help is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, " WU" �L -I Julie Lagerstrom �t City of Maplewood Official Sign -Up Sheet By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the Maplewood City Council on the following topic fhr up to five minutes. Name (first &last) - please print 15. A JA 5 16. ce Orwaa 17. 18. 11V'1�, -� n Jh�, 1L 19. l elce�� Eve s Address 4).54 O&J 0255 �G1 �Lri 2s5 3 � L l a53s {�l���aob bri � 73o- �d3�G� &C L 20. w%_Ac.,_ co Ppio �; o4r I v____ I v. � I V = ,, � 24. 25 a-F.L t46.�.GTa crvY. 2S? 2 Q -k41Z=O z6. a7. k JULY 31, 2000 MAYOR ROBERT CARDINAL MAPLEWOOD CITY HALL 1830 E..COUNTY RD. B MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 MAYOR CARDINAL, RECENT FLYERS DISTRIBUTED IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ARE INFORMING RESIDENTS OF A MEETING ON AUGUST 14, AT THE MAPLEWOOD CITY HALL, 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B. THE STATED PURPOSE OF THE MEETING IS TO HEAR RESIDENTS COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE POLICE FIRING RANGE LOCATED ON LINWOOD DRIVE. THE FLYERS DO NOT ASK FOR INPUT FROM RESIDENTS THAT ARE IN FAVOR OF LEAVING THE FIRING RANGE AT ITS PRESENT LOCATION. THE RESIDENTS LISTED BELOW, SOME WHO WILL ATTEND THE MEETING, SUPPORT THE CONTINUED USE OF THE FIRING RANGE IN OUR NEIGHBOR- HOOD. THE FIRING RANGE WAS IN ITS PRESENT LOCATION LONG BEFORE ANY OF US BOUGHT, OR HAD BUILT HOMES, IN THE AREA. THE NOISE GENERATED IS NO MORE.A DISRUPTION THAN AIRPLANES OVERHEAD OR FREEWAY NOISE. THESE ARE DANGEROUS TIMES FOR POLICE OFFICERS AND THEY NEED A PLACE TO PRACTICE THEIR SKILLS BOTH FOR THEIR R SAFETY AND THE SAFETY OF -THE PEOPLE THEY SERVE, I KNOW OF NO REPORTED ACCIDENTS INVOLVING THE FIRING RANGE IN THE SEVEN YEARS I HAVE LIVED HERE, WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL TAKE NO ACTION TO LIMIT OR ELIMINATE THE FIRING RANGE, WAYNE AND BERNICE BESTLAND, 2479 HILLWOOD DRIVE PAUL AND BEVERLY GORGOS, 2489 HILLWOOD DRIVE SCOTT AND GWEN BESTLAND. 705 STERLING ST. STUART BESTLAND, 2573 OAKRIDGE CT. MEMORANDUM FROM THE DESK OF JOHN DONOFRIO 651 - 736 -8819 PHONE J 651- 737 -6397 FAX jtdonofrio @mmm.com TO: Maplewood City Council 9 FROM: _ john Donofrio / Jan Donofrio, - 1 RE: Ramsey County Firing Range DATE: 7/17/00 We are writing this letter to share our concerns with the Ramsey County Firing Range in South Maplewood. Having now been in possession of our home at 2569 Hillwood Drive in Maplewood for just over Four years, our observations should be heard as a relatively long -term perspective. Before we decided to build in the Beth Heights development, we in fact visited the firing range to learn more of the when / why etc of the operation. We were informed that firing practice was done only from 8 - 5 on Monday through Friday of each week, and that usually it is more intense at the end of the month when officers had to meet their cut off for qualifications. The officer in charge, was kind enough to schedule some firing while we sat on the lot we wanted to build on. Our experience showed that it would not be possible to contend with the noise on that lot, and we moved to a more distant location. The long -term reality has been, that firing is many, MANY times conducted well after 5pm, and on weekends as well. We have also noticed that during this past 4 years, more high power weapons are fired (with louder noise to support), and even in our more distant lot ... very attention getting. Many times. I work out of my home for part of the day, firing is very audible while I am on the phone. Jan works in the home each day and daily reminded of the noise factor. Also of major concern, is the value of the property. Our tax assessment does not seem to take into account the impact of this negative selling feature in the neighborhood that gains in volume and intensity each month. Of special consideration should be the on- going embarrassment of visitors to the neighborhood who question the firing noise, possible safety issues and the concern over living in such a neighborhood. 4 r i J000 f 00 2 1, 100, aid su C `O - MM U N I CAT 10 N S Writing Public Relations Marketing Events i August 2000 - - - TO: - Maplewood City Council _ FROM: Kristin Smith, president " KAS Communications KAS Fitness Training t RE: Ramsey. County Firing" Range , :I am writing in- support of relocating the - Ramsey County Firing Range on Linwood Ave., in °south Maplewood. =; A. small business owner, I office out of my home at 2535_ Hillwood Drive. There, I routinely meet with vendors :and clients in my work as , both a p ersonal fitness trainer and ' V a public. relations and marketing consultant. A quiet, uninterrupted environment that takes advantage of woodlands and ponds is necessary to the success of each• a firing range _ .p rY � g g . within 100 aids of m office home,\' y y office'. gym, and walking /running paths, therefore, is _ troublesome. - Range business hours and activity levels vary week -to -week with no consistent pattern. Often, activity begins well before 8 a.m.; toward month's, end, noise and volume escalate significantly. Large, and small uns alike can be heard in m home (basement) g Y gYrn and \ in m u stairs office. Efficient. work. outdoorss im os"sible. As a result m business Y p p Y suffers. I am unable to work with clients .'in a peaceful" environment,, or hold meetin s \ . g without distraction. Concentration when on deadline for writing assignments is difficult. - o :My concerns aside, "new homes and residents are increasingly becoming part of our community, many of which are located with a half -mile of the range. It is reasonable to expect that because many of these will bring new business to the communit range activity will prove an ongoing city concern. { F Please consider re- locating the firing range to an area more suitable to the work of our - safety officers, away from homes and businesses. Doing so will help to support small - business. owners like myself, others who perform work at home, and residents. Questions.? Don't hesitate to contact me at 651 - 730 -6888. Thank you in advance for Y our - consideration. - 2535 H i I (wood Drive -- Maplewood, MN 55119 - [6511730-6888 0 2 Fax,[6511 730 -8333 la E-mail