Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 07-24 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 24, 2000 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 00 -15 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Council/Manager Workshop Meeting (July 10, 2000) 2. Minutes of Meeting 00 -14 (July 10, 2000) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Authorization for Program Participation 3. Donation to Police Reserves 4. Conditional Use Permit Review - Nursery School (47 Century Avenue South) 5. Conditional Use Permit Review.- Excel Air Systems (2075 Prosperity Road) 6. Change Order No. 3 for MCC and Final Acceptance of Fitness Expansion Project 7. Budget Adjustment -Youth Sports Clinics 8. Budget Transfer - Recorder and Transcription Machine -City Clerk and City Council H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. US West Telecommunications Monopole (1194 County Road C) A. Conditional Use Permit B. Design Approval 2. 7:10 P.M. Super America (1750 White Bear Avenue) A. Building Setback Variance B. Conditional Use Permit C. Parking Reduction Authorization D. Design Approval I. AWARD OF BIDS I . Lift Station No. 9, Project 99 -02 J• UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Highpoint Ridge (County Road D and Highway 61) A. Comprehensive Plan Changes (4 votes) R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (lightmanufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) Drop planned minor collector street B. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD)C. Preliminary Plat D. No Parking for One Side of Private Streets and Driveways K• NEW BUSINESS I . Electrical Permit and Inspection Fees 2. Public Safety Dispatching L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 01 ADJOURNMENT Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request forthisservicemustbemadeatleast96hoursinadvance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to makearrangements. Assistant Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability. D1 City of Maplewood CITY COUNCIL /MANAGER WORKSHOP Meeting Minutes Monday, July 10, 2000 Council Chambers, Municipal Building 6:00 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Cardinal at 6:00 p.m. B. ROLL CALL C. 10 Mayor Robert Cardinal Present Councilmember Sherry Allenspach Present Councilmember Kenneth Collins Present Councilmember Marvin Koppen Present Councilmember Julie Wasiluk Present APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the agenda as submitted. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Koppen. The motion passed 5 -0. PLANNING PROPOSAL FOR HAJICEK PROPERTY Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. Ross Fefercorn, RMF Entities, Inc., Consultant, and Carolyn Krall, Architectural Design Services, addressed the council regarding the development of the Robert Hajicek property located west of the Maplewood Mall. The 80 acre parcel may be part of future development. Mr. Fefercorn and Ms. Krall were present to suggest ways that the city and the landowner could be proactive in establishing a criteria for development opportunities. E. THE MAPLEWOOD AWARD Acting City Manager Haider introduced and presented the specifics of the report. This award is presented as part of the National Night Out ceremonies, which will be held on August 1st this year. There are two nominees: Gordy Heininger, local founder of the Listening Post at John Glenn Middle. School; and Pete Boulay, for his work on the Maplewood Area Historical Society, both of which will receive an award. There was a discussion on how the city ants to proceedyp with this award program. It was suggested that an awards committee made up of community members be set up to help in selecting individuals for the Maplewood Award for the year 2001. F. OTHER BUSINESS Community Development Director Coleman reminded everyone that there is an Open HouserYp at the Maple Ponds Apartment Project at 1816 Beebe Road on Jul 11th starting at 4:3Julyg 0 p.m. and a dinner at 6:00 p.m. G. FUTURE TOPICS Acting City Manager Haider said he received a communication from Crowns askin g that a meeting be set up to review semi - finalists between July 17th and August 1 st. This would be a one to two hour meeting and would have to be held in confidence because the discussion would be about applicants that are not yet made public. Mr. Haider said that this meetin g could be held during the next Council/Manager Workshop on July 24th. The Mayor and Council decided to hold a Special Meeting on Monday, July 17th. H. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Councilmember Allenspach moved and Councilmember Wasiluk seconded a motion to adjourn the meetin at 6:5 8 .m. 0 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 10, 2000 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 00 -14 A. . CALL TO ORDER: A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers,Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. b y Mayoror Cardinal. Be PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: C. ROLL CALL: Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Councilmember Wasiluk moved to aDprove the minutes of Council /Mann er Work shp(June 26, 2000Council/Manner as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all Councilmember Allenspach moved to the minutes of Meetin No. 00 -1 p 0 3 (Junc 26, 2000) as resented. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilmember Allenspach moved to aDprove the Agenda as amended: MI. Events Update -Summer M2. Council Meeting Agendas M3. City Web Site NI. Policy for Disaster Debris Removal Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all 1 j 2l F, APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS: None G. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the Consent Agenda as amended: Remove Item G. 2., Community Development Staffing Request, from the Consent Agenda and place it under K. 1. for discussion. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all 1. Approval of Claims Approved the claims. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 2,948.64 Checks #8320 thru #8321 dated 6 -16 -00 166,822.98 Checks #50302 thru #50402 dated 6 -27 -00 2 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 6 -20 thru 6 -26 -00 37,411.00 Checks #8322 thru #8330 dated 6 -26 thru 6 -29 -00 435,015.54 Checks #50405 thru #50487 dated 7 -3 -00 6,042 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 6 -27 thru 7-3-00 9,431,408.32 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL 315,321.86 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 6 -23 -00 23 Payroll Deduction check #79056 thru #79061 dated 6 -23 -00 338 Total Payroll 9,770,036.00 GRAND TOTAL 2. Community Development Staffing Request This item was moved to New Business, K. L, for discussion. 3. HRC Resignation Councilmember Allenspach moved to adopt the ioint resolution of appreciation for Barbara Sko2lund who has been a member of the Human Relations Commission Board since April 6 1999: 2 RESOLUTION 00 -07 -072 JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Barbara Skoglund has been a member of the Maplewood Human Relations Commission Board since April 6, 1999 and has served faithfully in that capacity; and WHEREAS, the Human Relations Commission Board has appreciated her experience, insights and good judgement; and WHEREAS, Barbara has freely given of her time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, Barbara, has shown dedication to her duties and has consistently contributed her leadership and effort for the benefit of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens that Barbara Skoglund is hereby extended our gratitude and appreciation for her dedicated service and we wish her continued success in the future. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all H. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 7:00 P.M. Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse (1820 Van Dyke Street) A. Conditional Use Permit B. Design Approval a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing. b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Dale Trippler presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following person was heard: Kevin Finley, Director of Operations, Ramsey County Parks & Recreation f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. 3 A. Conditional Use Permit Councilmember Wasiluk introduced the following Conditional Use Permit Resolution for the Goodrich Golf Course and clubhouse expansion at 1820 Van Dyke Street and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 00 -07 -073 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ramsey County applied for a conditional use permit for the Goodrich Golf Course and to add onto the clubhouse. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at 1820 Van Dyke Street. The legal description is: - SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, SUBJECT TO STREETS AND AVES AND EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND EXCEPT PART OF N V2 OF SW 1/4 SOUTHEASTERLY OF NORTH ST. PAUL ROAD AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF HAZEL STREET AND EXCEPT THE WEST 810 FEET OF NORTH V2 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND EXCEPT THE WEST 810 FEET OF THE SOUTH 235 8/10 FEET OF SOUTH V2 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 AND EXCEPT THE WEST 870 FEET OF THE SOUTH %2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 LYING NORTH OF SAID SOUTH 235 8/10 FEET THE NORTH %2 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND SOUTH %2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 ALL IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On June 19, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On July 10, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The applicant must begin construction within one year after the council approves this permit or the permit shall end. The city council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant shall plant 24 trees along North St. Paul Road. The tree plan is subject to staff approval. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all B. Design Approval Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the architectural and site plans date - stamped May 26, 2000 and the landscape plan dated June 13, 2000 for the Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse addition, subject to the findings required by the city code. The developer shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this proj ect. 5 2. Submit a grading, drainage and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval prior to getting a building permit. 3. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 2. 7:10 P.M. Amusement City Conditional Use Permit Revision (1870 Rice Street) a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing. b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Dale Trippler presented the Planning Commission report. e. Boardmember Tim Johnson presented the Community Design Review Board report. f. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Darrin Johnson, Splat Tag, Inc., representing Amusement City Milo Thompson, 1794 Onacrest Curve, Maplewood Carolyn Peterson, 1999 Jackson Street, Maplewood Chief Winger read the firearms section of the city code. Patrick Kelly, City Attorney, gave a court opinion on the interpretation of "paint ball" as a firearm. Bob Jancoski, 870 Westwind Drive, Little Canada Dave Jancoski, 870 Westwind Drive, Little Canada Lesley Johnson, 2070 11th Avenue East, North St. Paul Paul Paulos, 1873 Beaumont Street, Maplewood Tom McDonough, 660 Eldridge Avenue East, Maplewood Darrin Johnson, second appearance Dan Betts, owner, Amusement City Darrin Johnson, third appearance g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Koppen introduced the following revised Conditional Use Permit Resolution for Amusement City at 1870 Rice Street and moved for its adoption: X RESOLUTION 00 -07 -074 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the city council approved a conditional use permit for an amusement facility at 1870 Rice Street on November 17, 1977 and amended it several times since. WHEREAS, the property owner is requesting approval of a conditional use permit amendment to expand his amusement facility to the south onto vacant property and to convert an existing building into a pizza restaurant. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the following described property: EISENMENGER AND ZASPEL' S LAKE PARK, RAMSEY CO., MINN., SUBJECT TO ST AND AVE AND VAC STS AND ALLEYS ACCRUING, THE FOL A TRACT LYING NWLY OF SOO LINE RY R/W OF THE FOL; LOTS 4 THRU 10 BLK 1, LOT 7 BLK 2, LOTS 5 THRU 32 BLK 4, LOTS 12 THRU 25 BLK 6 AND ALL OF BLK 3. EISENMENGER AND ZASPEL' S LAKE PARK, RAMSEY CO., MINN., SUBJECT TO HWY THE FOL VAC ALLEY ACCRUING AND LOTS 33 THRU LOT 39 BLK 4. EISENMENGER AND ZASPEL' S LAKE PARK, RAMSEY CO., MINN. VAC ST AND ALLEY ACCRUING AND LOTS 1 THRU 4 BLK 4. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows: 1. On June 19, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council deny this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on July 10, 2000. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council revise the above - described conditional use permit revision, based on the following reasons: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area 7 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subj ect to the following conditions: The suspension of the driving range shall be in effect until a public hearing has been held and the suspension by the city council ended. The conditional use permit for the remainder of the facility is still in effect. The property owner shall comply with the following revised conditions of approval: 1. Comply with the approved site plan dated May 16, 2000, with the exception that the paint -ball course shall not be allowed since the discharge of firearms within city limits is not permitted by ordinance. 2. Maintain the following site improvements: a. A reflectorized stop sign at the Rice Street driveway. b. A striped parking lot with at least 94 parking spaces as shown on the November 30 1993 site plan. The applicant shall have four handicap parking stalls and handicap - parking signs for each stall. There shall be at least one van - accessible space. (Americans with Disabilities Act requirement) C. A trash dumpster enclosure for any outside trash dumpsters subject to staff approval. d. Direct or shield the lights so the bulbs are not directly visible from any public street. (code requirement) H 3. Future revisions to the approved site plan must come before the city council for their review and approval, except that minor changes may be approved by the director of community development. 4. The applicant must not encroach into the wetland with this expansion. 5. The 45 "new" parking spaces shown on the May 16, 2000 site plan must be paved, striped, meet code on size, and have continuous concrete curbing around the entire parking lot, unless breaks are required by the city engineer for drainage reasons. The applicant shall also eliminate the furthest southeast parking space since access to this space is limited. 6. The hours of operation for the amusements and games shall be 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. The restaurant may be open until 11 p.m. 7. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 8. The owner shall remove all signs advertising the paint ball park. 9. The owner shall immediately remove the trailer sign on the property and make sure the women's bathroom is operational. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 3. 7:20 P.M. Highpoint Ridge (County Road D and Highway 61) a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing. b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Dale Trippler presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Jeff Florizak, 1233 Duluth Court, Maplewood Jeff Bradt, 1236 Summit Court, Maplewood Brent Jorgenson, 1235 Summit Court, Maplewood Terry Schroeder, 3007 Frank Street, Maplewood Jean Doyle, 1801 Gervais Avenue, Maplewood Mary Dean, 1233 East County Road D, Vadnais Heights Joe Prokosch, 1272 East County Road D, Maplewood Doug Huntley, 3 020 Edward Street, Maplewood 9 Yvonne Barrett, 1176 East County Road D, Maplewood Jeff Bradt, second appearance Frank Frattalone, 3205 Centerville Road, Developer of the Project Bruce Mogren, 10116 - 67th Lane North, Grant Gordy Howe, Consultant to F. M. Frattalone Gary Morgan, 3220 Fremont Avenue, Minneapolis Tushar Desai, 2973 Edward Street, Maplewood Doug Huntley, second appearance f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Collins moved to table this item until the July 24, 2000 Council Meeting to 2ive staff time to study the traffic report that was received on July 17, 2000. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen . Ayes - all I. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Bituminous Seal Coating, Project 00 -07 a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Allenspach introduced the Resolution for Award of Bid for Bituminous Seal Coatini4, Project 00 -07, to Allied Blacktop Company in the amount of $89,650 and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION 00 -07 -075 RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Allied Blacktop Company in the amount of $89,650 is the lowest responsible bid for Bituminous Seal Coating, City Project 00 -07, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. Seconded by Councilmember Ayes - all 10 J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. LBC Zoning District Regulations Code Amendment (Second Reading) a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Allenspach moved to adopt the following ordinance amending the permitted uses in the Limited Business Commercial District requirements: ORDINANCE NO. 802 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PERMITTED USES IN THE LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: Section 1. This section changes Sections 36 -154 as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Section 36- 154(a) Permitted Uses. Offices, medical or health - related clinics and day care centers. The city will allow uses similar to the above if they would not create a nuisance and if they are not noxious or hazardous. The city council shall review uses that are not clearly similar for a determination of compatibility Section 36- 154(b) Reserved. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper. Seconded by Councilmember /Mayor Ayes - all K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Community Development Staffing Request a. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. Mayor Cardinal moved to grant the temporarypart -time position needed in the Community Development Department. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Allenspach, Collins, Wasiluk Abstain - Councilmember Koppen 11 L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Events Update - Councilmember Allenspach commented that the city's July 4th Celebration turned out very well and commended the Parks & Recreation Department and the Police Department for a job well done. Councilmember Allenspach also reminded everyone that the Midsummer Nights are still going strong. 2. Council Meeting Agendas - Councilmember Collins said he had requests from residents to have the agenda posted on the cable network. 3. City Web Site - Mayor Cardinal asked about the city's website and having more information on it as time goes on. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Policy for Disaster Debris Removal - Acting Mayor Haider explained the city's policy for disaster debris removal. Mr. Haider asked the Council if they would like to include the whole city in debris removal from the latest storm as opposed to just the area already designated. The Council indicated their approval of a city -wide debris removal plan. 2. Mayor Cardinal informed the councilmembers that City Attorney Patrick Kelly has been asked to be the incoming 2002 President of the Ramsey County Bar Association and wanted to congratulate Mr. Kelly. O. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Koppen moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:30 P.M. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all Karen E. Guilfoile, City Clerk 12 AGENDA NO. G -1 TO: City Council FROM: Assistant Finance Director bLt> RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AGENDA REPORT DATE: July 14, 2000 Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified Rejected Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 1,500.00 3208843 290,024.51 273,114.82 124737.08 Checks #8331 dated 7-3-00 Checks #50490 thru #50579 dated 7 -11 -00 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 7 -5 thru 7 -10 -00 Checks #8332 thru #8340 dated 7 -10 thru 7 -13 -00 Checks #50582 thru #50688 dated 7 -18 -00 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 7 -11 thru 7 -17 -00 3,996,195.60 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 7 -7 -00 24,568.02 Payroll Deduction check #79249 thru #79256 dated 7 -7 -00 352,619.91 Total Payroll 4,348,815.51 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. hu Attachments SAAGENMAKL0014.JUL VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 07/07/00 08:18 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 8331 07/03/00 861671 THE ROCKIN' HOLLYWOODS JULY 4TH ENTERTAINMENT 1,500.00 1,500.00 50490 07/11/00 RAMSEY COUNTY FAMILY SRV CTR REFUND-GRADING 2001 VAN DYKE 5 REFUND-GRADING 2001 VAN DYKE 272.88 5,272.88 50491 07/11/00 SUSAN SCHWARTZ REFUND - SWIM 40.00 40.00 50492 07/11/00 KIM SCHLAGEL REFUND - SWIM 40.00 40.00 50493 07/11/00 P WARNER REFUND - PUPPET THEATRE 25.00 25.00 50494 07/11/00 BLUE CROSS REFUND REFUND - 00001061A J BARHER 382.30 382.30 50495 07/11/00 010575 ACE HARDWARE BULB /BALLAST /TRASH 44.43 MISC SUPPLIES 168.53 MISC SUPPLIES 137.90 MISC SUPPLIES 264.42 MISC SUPPLIES 216.35 831.63 50496 07/11/00 020405 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL MEDICAL 02 132.40 1.32.40 50497 07/11/00 020411 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEVUE.CELL RHONE 29.72 CELL PHONE CELL PHONE - JULY 45 w"69 CELL PHONE 20.37 161.60 50498 07/11/00 020954 ALPHA BITS 3 SHOWS 255.00 255.00 50499 07/11/00 021205 AMERICAN FLAGPOLE & FLAG CO.NEW FLAG - STATION 4 95.85 95.85 50500 07/11/00 030310 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.125 MOTOROLA MONITORIII PAGERS 46,560.63 46,560.63 50501 07/11/00 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.PATROL AND BOARDING FEES 1,038.60 1,038.60 50502 07/11/00 030730 ANOKA HENNEPIN TECH COLLEGE LIVEBORN SIMULATOR 550.00 LP GAS EMERGENCIES 550.00 1 50503 07/11/00 031905 AQUA LOGIC, INC.POOL CHEMICALS 46.52 46.52 50504 07/11/00 070445 STAN BELDE MEALS /LODGING AT TRAINING 152.07 152.07 50505 07/11/00 074000 BLUEBIRD RECOVERY PROGRAM CARDS /SIGNS /NOTES 9.32 CARDS /SIGNS/NOTES 57-8.75 50506 07/11/00 080925 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS QRTRLY UTIL - 1900 CLARENCE 69.30 QRTRLY UTIL - 1810 CTY RD B 28.80 QRTRLY UTIL - 2001 MCMENEMY ST 10.80 QRTRLY UTIL - 2659 SEVENTH ST 30,60 139.50 50507 07/11/00 110152 CSI SOFTWARE CARDS - KEY TAGS 1,030.00 1 1 VOUCHRE2 07/07/00 08:18 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER PAGE 2 FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 50508 07/11/00 120515 CENTRAL STORES OFFICE SUPPLIES 78.92 CANON CARTRIDGE 206.77 285.69 50509 07/11/00 152400 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC.ROLL 36" X 50 YDS IJB 13.36 13.36 50510 07/11/00 152553 CORPORATE 4 INS AGENCY,. INC.RENEW POLICY 7/1/2000- 7/1/2001 2 2 50511 07/11/00 152560 COURTESY CAR RENTAL VAN RENTAL - VOLUNTEER FLD TRP 319.33 319.33 50512 07/11/00 170200 CUB FOODS- MAPLEWOOD EAST BUNS 10.34 10.34 50513 07/11/00 180390 DADCO FOOD PRODUCTS MDSE. FOR RESALE 80.40 MDSE. FOR RESALE 80.40 160.80 50514 07/11/00 180690 DAKOTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE TRI-COUNTY DUES 60.00 60.00 50515 07/11/00 180800 DALCO DOUBLE V BELT 12.89 DOUBLE V BELT 10.56 TWLS /DSFNFCTNT /SMPO /BRUTE 266.10 TWLS /DSFNFCTNT /SMPO /BRUTE 217.72 ; _ TWLS /DSNFCTNT /SHMPO /LNN /CLR`"473.84 LSTW MPO /LNR /CLR 68.78 50516 07/11/00 181852 DAVIS LOCK &SAFE KEYS -12.78 12078 50517 07/11/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 709.00 709.00 50518 07/11/00 200500 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS PAINT & SUPPLIES 44.41 PAINT & SUPPLIES 36.34 80,75 50519 07/11/00 210600 THE DRAMA KIDS HEAD INSTRUCTOR - DRAMA CLASS 880.00 880.00 50520 07/11/00 230745 CITY OF EAGAN DEPOSIT FOR TRIP 200.00 200.00 50521 07/11/00 230850 THOMAS EASTMAN MRPA MEEETING - MILEAGE REIMB 13.44 13.44 50522 07/11/00 240375 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.AMB MEDIC 1 11135.64 REPAIR TO OLD M4 371.20 1,506.84 50523 07/11/00 240380 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH, INC REPAIR PARTS 82.43 82.43 50524 07/11/00 250500 EXECUTONE SYSTEMS OF ST PAUL PHONE FOR C WEAVER 300.96 300.96 50525 07/11/00 260290 FARMER BROS. CO.MDSE. FOR RESALE 41.20 41.20 50526 07/11/00 280820 MARY ANN FRANNSEN 3 SHOWS 150.00 150.00 50527 07/11/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 8.50 FEES FOR SERVICE 27.00 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 21.53 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.40 2 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 07 /07 /00 08:18 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 47.73 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.40 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 48.57 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 66.81 UNIFORMS &CLOTHING 78.33 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 40.79 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 25.58 453.64 50528 07/11/00 320501 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC.2/20 EMTR FOR 24 STUDENTS 190.00 2/20 EMTR FOR 24 STUDENTS 4,560.00 4,750.00 50529 07/11/00 340110 HEJNY RENTALS, INC TILLER 45.85 CHIPPER 62.36 108.21 50530 07/11/00 350700 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT /SUPPLIES 32.48 PAINT /SUPPLIES 26.58 POLICY ADJ 2.07- CREDIT - SATIN CLEAR OIL 12.29 - SATIN CLEAR OIL 13.36 58.06 50531 07/11,/0.0 370075 HUGO' S THE E CARE TREE .TRIMMING : ,143.78 1+3.78 50532 071.1 00 39Q15 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY:, INC.BELTS 3.44 BELTS 27.36 60.80 50533 07/11/00 401225 JIM N JO'S KATERING 10 BOX LUNCHES 69.76 69.76 50534 07/11/00 401670 JOLLY TYME FAVORS BANNER /NECKLACES /PENNANTS 311.35 GLOW NECKLACES 346.68 658.03 50535 07/11/00 410600 CARL KESSEL REPAIR TO HIS CAR -HIT BY M1 259.87 259.87 50536 07/11/00 430290 KNOTTS CAMP SNOOPY 45 ADMISSIONS TO CAMP SNOOPY 495.00 495.00 50537 07/11/00 440900 DAVID KVAM MEALS AT TRAINING 16.00 16.00 50538 07/11/00 500300 M.A. ASSOCIATES 55 GAL HD CAN LINERS 337.57 337.57 50539 07/11/00 500651 M.R.P.A.10 SOFTBALL STATE TOURN BERTHS 1,150.00 MRPA MEMBERSHIP /K ATKINS 120.00 CHURCH - STATE TOURN BERTH 115.00 1,385.00 50540 07/11/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 46075 46.75 50541 07/11/00 511180 MARKO AUTO SERVICE REPAIR A/C 171.42 171.42 50542 07/11/00 530755 METROCALL DIGITAL PAGER 10.46 PAGER RENTAL /SERVICE 22.57 33.03 50543 07/11/00 531920 MICHAEL'S STORES INC.PIPE CLEANERS /STAMP PAD 18.44 18.44 3 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 407/07/00 08:18 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50544 07/11/00 540175 MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO.MDSE. FOR RESALE 197.00 MDSE. FOR RESALE 85.25 282.25 50545 07/11/00 542150 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FF1 - HAMLIN 35.00 FF1 - SMITH 35.00 70.00 50546 07/11/00 542201 3M ELECTRONIC CUTTABLE FILM 441.68 441.68 50547 07/11/00 570090 MOGREN BROS.BLACK DIRT PROJ 98 -10 63.90 63.90 50548 07/11/00 620600 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER SYL 64469/ADV 65721 767.33 SYL 64469/ADV 65721 627.82 SYLVANIA LAMPS 87.30 SYLVANIA LAMPS 71.44 T-8 LAMPS /ELEV LAMPS 176.06 T -8 LAMPS /ELEV LAMPS 144.05 1,874.00 50549 07/11/00 661190 NORTHERN FRAMES & GALLERY FRAMES, GLASS AND MAT FOR CERT 27.40 FRAMES, GLASS AND MAT FOR CERT 220'42 49.82 5035:0 :,:07/..1.1 /00 661784 NORTHWEST. CAMERA - & V,I DEO -:REP , REPAI R / CLEAN /ADJ VIDEO CAMERA 289000 289:00 5055 07/11/00 670950 NYSTROM 'PUBLISHING INC -MAPLEWOOD N> MOT I -:I ON ,lULY2000 :..927..36' '1 927.3.E 50552 07/11/00 681151 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN OFFICE SUPPLIES 55.64 55.64 50553 07/11/00 700664 PAGENET PAGER SERVICE 104.85 104.85 50554 07/11/00 700900 PARK SUPPLY, INC.SHOWER SAVER HEAD 46.48 SHOWER SAVER HEAD 38.03 84.51 50555 07/11/00 712115 POLAR CHEV, GEO, MAZDA DEDUCTIBLE WARRANTY CHARGE 100.00 100.00 50556 07/11/00 712260 POOLSIDE DRAIN COVER /GASKET /RAIL HRDWRE 86..07 DRAIN COVER /GASKET /RAIL HRDWRE 70.43 DUPL PYMT - INV #041033 15.11- DUPL PYMT - INV #041033 12.37 - SERVICE CHRG F05465 1.06 SERVICE CHRG F05465 88 130.96 50557 07/11/00 722310 PUSH PEDAL PULL PRECOR - 556 EFX W /UPPER BODY 7,948.30 PRECOR - 556 EFX W /UPPER BODY 898.30-7,050.00 50558 07/11/00 740320 RDJ SPECIALTIES, INC.FIRE HATS 362.78 362.78 50559 07/11/00 741201 RAINBOW FOODS WATERMELONS 58.20 58.20 50560 07/11/00 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY-PRRREV DATA PROCESSING - MAY 2000 1.47 DATA PROCESSING - MAY 2000 1. 39 DATA PROCESSING - MAY 2000 1. 13 DATA PROCESSING - MAY 2000 03 4 VOUCH.RE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 07/07/00 08:18 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT DATA PROCESSING - MAY 2000 8.74 DATA PROCESSING - MAY 2000 905.20 917.96 50561 07/11/00 750550 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS CREDIT - MDSE. FOR RESALE 31.36- MDSE. FOR RESALE 432.93 401.57 50562 07/11/00 761195 ROAD RESCUE.EMERGENCY VEHICLES REPLACE FROM THE AMB FIRE 2,815.00 2,815.00 50563 07/11/00 761300 ROADRUNNER COURIER SRV TO SPRINGSTEAD 14.31 COURIER SRV TO SPRINGSTEAD 23.99 38.30 50564 07/11/00 762000 RON'S PAINTING & DECORATING PAINTING MEZZ AT MCC 495.00 495.00 50565 07/11/00 770802 RYDER BUS COMPANY BUS TO MALL OF AMERICA 235.00 235.00 50566 07/11/00 780090 JEFFREY SCHADT LODGING /MILEAGE 377.75 377.75 50567 07/11/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.SUPPLIES - OFFICE 43.72 FILE POCKETS 13010 56.82 50568`.:07/1 820461 :.MAKE:: LAS. BA ,.....MSNC. 3 DAYS 150, 00 150.. 0 50569.07 11 00 830-240-_:_..--.. , ,SOK I AK MEASURING SYSTEMS ,..,24 .LATH 36 BUNDLES t 277.33 277.:33 50570 07/11/00 843570 STREAMLINE DESIGN SS BEST TEE 9.00 RED SOFTBALL SHIRT 10.00 ROYAL SOFTBALL SHIRT 10.00 LIME TEE-SHIRTS 110.00 LIME TEE-SHIRTS 50.00 LEFT CHEST PRINT 70.00 LIME TEE - SHIRTS 72.50 LIME TEE- SHIRTS 100.00 TEE SHIRTS FULL FRONT PRINT 10.00 441.50 50571 r 07/11/00 851575 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.PRINTER CART /DESIGNJET CART 180.26 r PRINTER CART /DESIGNJET CART 180.26 PRINTER CART /DESIGNJET CART 707.86 PRINTER CART /DESIGNJET CART 157.19 PRINTER CART /DESIGNJET CART 93.18 PRINTER CART /DESIGNJET CART 212.37 1,531.12 50572 07/11/00 860315 TR COMPUTER SALES, INC.MODIFIED PERMIT FORM FILES 50.00 50.00 50573 07/11/00 860320 T.R.F. SUPPLY CO.LITHIUM GREASE 193.83 193.83 50574 07/11/00 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA ACCTS REC POP 91.44 RAINWATER PICNIC PAPER PRODUCT 28.07 119.51 50575 07/11/00 860690 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN MISC MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 45.08 45.08 50576 07/11/00 900000 UNDERWATER WORLD 45 ADMISSIONS TO WATERWORLD 270.00 270.00 5 VOUCHRE2 07/07/00 08:18 VOUCHER/ PAGE 6 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 50577 07/11/00 900150 UNISOURCE 50578 07/11/00 910500 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL 50579 07/11/00 934170 THE WATSON CO INC CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 ITEM ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 CASES WIPER TOWELS 403.02 6 CASES WIPER TOWELS 24.60-378.42 PW TRASH REMOVAL - JULY 2000 336..92 CH RUBBISH REMOVAL - JULY 2000 242.35 MCC TRASH REMOVAL - JULY 2000 537 .94 1 MDSE. FOR RESALE 205.18 MDSE. FOR RESALE 200.87 406.05 TOTAL CHECKS 99 ,476.19 16 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checkin g account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Pa ee Description Amount 07/03/00 07/05/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 489.50 07 /03 /00 07/05/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 24 627.40 06/30/00 07/06/00 CBSA Dental claims 702.08 06/30/00 07/06/00 Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items 3 07/05/00 07/06/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 594.00 07/05/00 07/06/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 26,241.38 07106 /00 07 /07 /00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 758.00 07/06/00 07/07/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 22 07/07/00 07/07/00 Smith Barney Investment purchase 1,028,586.11 07/07/00 07/07/00 US Bancorp Investment p urchase 993 07/07/00 07/10/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 794.75 07/07/00 07/10/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 20,889.63 07/07/00 07/10/00 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 72,236.03 07/07/00 07/10/00 NISI Investment purchase 1 TOTAL 3 7 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 07/14/00 08:16 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 8332 07/10/00 330680 HEALTHPARTHERS MONTHLY PREM - JULY 2000 5,610.97 MONTHLY PREM - JULY 2000 20,843.88 MONTHLY PREM - JULY 2000 4,027.16 30,482.01 8333 07/10/00 530100 MEDICA CHOICE MONTHLY PREMIUM - JULY 2000 4,890.92 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JULY 2000 24,924.53 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JULY 2000 2,297.06 32,112.51 8334 07/10/00 110870 CBSA MONTHLY ADMIN FEE - JULY 2000 510.00 510.00 8335 07/10/00 551100 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY PREM - JULY 2000 344,98 MONTHLY PREM - JULY 2000 1,204.76 MONTHLY PREM - JULY 2000 966.60 MONTHLY PREM - JULY 2000 64.26 2 8336 07/10/00 280200 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO.MONTHLY PREMIUM - JULY 2000 2,042.29 2,042;29 8337 07/10/00 341706 HERITAGE BANK US'- SAVINGS BONDS 6/23.& 7/7 600.00 600.00 8338 07/10/00 722200 P.E.R.A.P%R DED REMITTANCE 7/7 PAYROLL 1.4,88.1.51 P/R DED REMITTANCE 7/7 PAYROLL 18,825.59 33,'707." 8339 07/11/00 170250 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS, INC.1500 GPM PUMPER"".187,890:00 8340 07/13/00 742150 RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS & REC.20 FAIR TICKETS 100.00 100.00 50582 07/18/00 GREATLAND HOMES REFUND - GRADING 2334 MAIDA CT E 1 REFUND-GRADING 2334 MAIDA CT E 61.37 1 50583 07/18/00 SWIFT CONSTRUCTION REF - GRADING 660 ELDRIDGE AVE 1 REF - GRADING 660 ELDRIDGE AVE 38.90 1,038.90 50584 07/18/00 KD HOMES REFUND- GRADING 716 FERNDALE S 1,000.00 REFUND-GRADING 716 FERNDALE S 22.74 1,022.74 50585 07/18/00 FAMILY HOMES REFUND - GRADING 1748 MCMENEMY N 1 REFUND- GRADING 1748 MCMENEMY N 11.23 1,011.23 50586 07/18/00 DEBBIE KLEIN REFUND - SWIM 40.00 40.00 50587 07/18/00 PAT LYONS REFUND - SWIM 30.00 30.00 50588 07/18/00 JACQUELINE JASKULSKE REFUND - T BALL 35.00 35.00 50589 07/18/00 BARBARA PETERSON REFUND - DAYTIME 35.00 35.00 50590 07/18/00 MICHELLE LAUDET REFUND - DAYTIME T BALL 35.00 35.00 50591 07/18/00 MARY J JOHNSON REFUND - DAYTIME T BALL 35.00 35.00 50592 07/18/00 JACQUELYN MAHER REFUND - T BALL 40.00 40.00 8 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 07/14/00 08:16 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50593 07/18/00 GLORIA FRUETEL REFUND - T BALL 40.00 40.00 50594 07/18/00 POLLY JOHNSON REFUND - BAL OF MEMBERSHIP 93.17 93.17 50595 07/18/00 010463 A T & T LONG DIST BILL 37.24 PRESONAL CALLS (8 EMPLOYEES)28.99 66.23 50596 07/18/00 010575 ACE HARDWARE CHARGER BATTERY /BRUSHES /MISC 208.87 SCISSORS /TAPE /CLIPS /HOOK 17.93 KEY /SCREW EYE /CORD STRETCH 8.40 BIB APRON 3.82 STAPLES /STAPLER 15.03 PROPANE 8,62 KEYS CUT 11.41 COUPLINGS /ADAP /KNIFE /HOSE /MISC 20.69 294.77 50597 07/18/00 020405 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL 02 RENTAL 39494.20 02 CYL RENTAL 36.82 431,.02 50598,'07/18!00 020411,.VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEVUE .CELL r PHONES. -243,.10. SQDCELL PHONES,387. CELL PHONE 21.71 CELL ;CHARGES PWC 8 CELL CHARGES - STREET 30678 CELL CHARGES - UTIL 30.78 ENGR CELL PHONES 335.74 ENGR CELL PHONES 99.32 1,179.95 50599 07/18/00 020870 ALLIED MEDICAL ACCTS CONTROL AMT DUE FOR PRE-COLLECT 34.00 34.00 50600 07/18/00 030310 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.MONITOR III ALERT MONITOR 1,868.43 1,868.43 50601 07/18/00 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.PATROL & BOARDING FEES 1,612.47 1,612.47 50602 07/18/00 061100 BANNIGAN & KELLY P.A.LEGAL SRVS THRU 6/30/00 5,250.00 5 50603 07/18/00 061990 BAY FIREWORKS, INC.RAMSEY CTY FIREWORKS 3 3,000.00 50604 07/18/00 070445 STAN BELDE K -9 MAINTENANCE 35.00 35.00 50605 07/18/00 110150 C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES CREDIT SRV - BACKGROUND CHECKS 50.00 50.00 50606 07/18/00 120650 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES SUR SMOOTH /CUT THRU 921.71 921.71 50607 07/18/00 150190 COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONST. CO.REPAIR LIFT STA 6 188.25 188,25 50608 07/18/00 151830 CONNEY SAFTEY PRODUCTS FIRST AID KITS - NC 50.55 FIRST AID KITS - NC 41.36 91.91 50609 07/18/00 152400 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC.APR -JUN METER READING 33.00 MAINT CONTRACT 294.00 327.00 9 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 07/14/00 08:16 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 1 VOUCHER/ s CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER h DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT F:1 50610 1 07/18/00 170200 CUB FOODS- MAPLEWOOD EAST SUPPLIES FOR FITNESS TRNG 18.92 18.92 50611 07/18/00 170900 D & D TOWING SERVICE INC.TOW SQD 600 50.00 H TOW FORFEITURE VEH 109.23 159.23 t{50612 07/18/00 190250 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY,CAIS BOILER EXEMPTION 60.00 60.00 50613 f i' 07/18/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 347.00 347.00 if' I - 50614 07/18/00 190500 DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY TUITION. - KVAM 120.00 120.00 4 50615 07/18/00 200500 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS FILTERS /BRUSHES /SCRAPER 19.59 f,GLASS BEADS LATEX 536.76 556.35 50616 07/18/00 231525 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.PROJECT MGMT 906.25 906.25 id 1 50617 07/18/00 234475 ELECTRIC PUMP INC RENTAL OF FLYGT 2/24 T0.6/15 3,655:50 3,655.50 F ,50618 07/18/00 260761 FITNESS FIRST RTM RED XERTUBES 56632 RTM . 100 RED XERTUBES3- .1 2-5 3.20 50619 07/18/00 280820 MARY ANN FRANNSEN 3 : DAYS MSNC =:150.00 JULY 4TH_0o. o0 250.00 50620 07/18/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING -5.19 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 14.35 MATS 49.60 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 89.06 158.20 50621 07/18/00 310710 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.MONTHLY SRV JUNE 2000 979.20 979820 065 22 07 1 8 00 3 0 0184 GOVSTORE USA C4215AHABA HP LASERJET 8100N 3,056.66 3,056.66 50623 07/18/00 320250 GRAF, DAVE KARATE INSTRUCTOR 93.00 93.00 50624 07/18/00 320265 GRAFIX SHOPPE MISSION STATEMENT SIGN 71.36 71.36 50625 i 07/18/00 320501 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC.SHEEP LAB 6/27 63.00 63.00 50626 07/18/00 330200 HAMERNICK DECORATING CENTER SAFETY RED HYDRANT PAINT 313.64 313.64 50627 07/18/00 340110 HEJNY RENTALS, INC HAMMER - BOBCAT 143.29 143.29 50628 07/18/00 350470 STEVEN HIEBERT K-9 HANDLER 35.00 35.00 50629 07/18/00 350940 HOME DEPOT - GECF SUPPLIES •JANITORIAL 18.09 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 38.12 56.21 50630 07/18/00 351300 JUDITH HORSNELL MILEAGE 6 -15 TO 7-5 17.13 17.13 50631 07/18/00 351320 THOMAS HORWATH TREE INSPECTIONS 6/9 TO 7/7 1,080.00 1,080.00 10 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER /CHECKREGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 PAGE 4 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50632 07/18/00 351610 HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY LIFT STATION #9 7,373.30 7,373.30 50633 07/18/00 370075 HUGO'S TREE CARE REMOVE LOCUST TREE - LOOKOUT PK 202.35 TREE TRIMMING - 2163 BEAM AVE 159.75 362.10 50634 07/18/00 390104 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #622 VOLLEYBALL SUPV - 1/7 TO 3/17 665.50 VOLLEYBALL PROCESSING FEE 75.50 SUMMER 2000 PROGRAM BROCHURE 651.99 1 50635 07/18/00 390107 INDEPENDENT SPORTS NETWORK SOFTBALL UMPIRE 6/20 TO 7/9 2,515.50 2,515950 50636 07/18/00 390190 INFINITY WIRELESS RADIO EARPIECES 327.50 327.50 50637 07/18/00 430328 KNOWLANS GROCERIES 5.35 5.35 50638 07/18/00 440100 KREMER SPRING & ALIGNMENT REPL SPRING SHACKLES /PINS /ETC 233.30 233.30 50639 07/ 18/00 440800 KUSTOM SIGNALS :, I NC.SPEED MONITORING AWARENESS : TRL -10, 976.01 SPEED MONITORING AWARENESS TRL 3,658:67 14 50640 07/ 18/00 450140 L . T G . POWER EQUIPMENT .= i r . SPARK- PLUG /CARTR IrDGE /LABOR -40.50 40 -50 50641=07/18/00'450250 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORP D 18 SATTER1 ES `15 71.' 6 15 761 50642 07/18/00 470700 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS PUB NOT - BIT SEAL /TILGES 740 73 PUB NOT - BETTS /FINLEY /FRATTAL 109.35 PUB NOT - BID REPLACING ROOF 20.05 PURL NOT - F FRATTALONE 49.21 253.34 50643 t 07/18/00 490500 LUNDSTEN, LANCE MSSA MTG - LUNCH 11.84 11.84 50644 07/18/00 501225 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT SHAFT /SEALS 141.20 141.20 50645 07/18/00 511178 MARINE RESCUE PRODUCTS INC RESCUE TUBES /VIDEO 182.40 e GUARD HATS 60.71 E a RESCUE TUBES /VIDEO /GUARD HATS 13.91-229.20 r 50646 07/18/00 530501 MENARDS MAILING FLAGS /ORANGE TAPE 17.95 17.95 50647 07/18/00 531660 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MONTHLY SAC - JUNE 2000 42,950.00 E MONTHLY SAC - JUNE 2000 429.50-42,520.50 F 50648 Yf 07/18/00 540770 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGER 232.08 232.08 50649 07/18/00 541440 MINN. STATE TREASURER STAX MONTHLY SURTAX - JUNE 2000 5 MONTHLY SURTAX - JUNE 2000 102.21 - REFUND MONTHLY SURTAX- SEP2000 60.00 - REFUND MONTHLY SURTAX- SEP2000 1.19 4 50650 07/18/00 541950 MN CHAPTER IAAI MEMBERSHIP - B GERVAIS 25.00 25.00 11 VOl1CHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 07/14/00 08:16 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 50651 07/18/00 542140 MINNESOTA FIRE SERVICE FF1 - A HAMLIN 35.00 FF1 - R SMITH 35.00 70.00 50652 07/18/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO FILM 111.82 FILM 25 .56 DEV FILM 6.94 DEV FILM 4.20 FILM DEVELOPING 12.64 FILM 111.82 DEV FILM 25.21 DEV FILM 13.31 DEVELOP FILM 6.29 317.79 50653 07/18/00 542680 MINUTEMAN PRESS-MAPLEWOOD 125 TRAINING COPIES 33.28 33.28 50654 07/18/00 551500 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY CITY DUMP CLEAN UP 90.00 90.00 50655 07/18/00 630210 NARDINI FIRE EQUIP. CO., INC.5 PAILS FOAM 336.81 336:81 50656 07/18/00 630665 NAT FIRE'PROTECTION ASSN:FIRE /EXP HANDBOOK /INSP MANUAL. -'.106.60 FIRE /EXP`HANDSOOK /INSP'MANUAL 6.15 -°100.45 t &511:1 ' 07/ 18/00 i . ' .640550 AN-NELSON;M I.LEAGE - MAC 2 TO ` JUNE 30 41`:16 '41.1 50658 07/18/00 660900 NORTH STAR TURF, INC.SEAT'ASSEMBLY`260.52 BOLT/WASHER/LOCKWASHER 71.18 SEAT ASSEMBLY 260.52 592.22 50659 07/18/00 661600 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO.FLOJET 5.0 GPM PUMP 12 VOLT 104.36 104.36 50660 07/18/00 661755 NORTHERN STATES POWER MONTHLY UTIL - STMT DT 7 -6 -00 43.65 MONTHLY UTIL - STMT DT 7-6 -00 5,090.89 MONTHLY UTIL STMT DT 7 -6 -00 1,739.20 MONTHLY UTIL - STMT DT 7 -6 -00 12 ,448.51 MONTHLY UTIL - STMT DT 7 -6-00 1,017.78 MONTHLY UTIL - STMT DT 7 -6.00 237.68 MONTHLY UTIL - STMT DT 7-6 -00 1,459.54 MONTHLY UTIL - STMT DT 7 -6 -00 16,568.89 38,606.14 50661 07/18/00 691160 ON SITE SANITATION HAZELWOOD PARK 222.60 GERANIUM PARK 43.99 PARKS - INVOICE DT 7 -7 -00 1,341.42 1,608.01 50662 07/18/00 692800 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, INC.TANK RENTAL - MAY 4.50 TANK RENTAL - JUNE 4.50 9.00 50663 07/18/00 700664 PAGENET PD PAGERS 417.79 417.79 50664 07/18/00 722310 PUSH PEDAL PULL 2 STRETCH TRAINERS 1,266.50 2 STRETCH TRAINERS 71.50-1,195.00 12 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 07/14/00 08:16 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT f ., 50665 07/18/00 740322 RDO FINANCIAL SERVICES CO.BEARING /HANDLING FLASH 119.89 119.89 i 50666 07/18/00 740693 KEVIN RABBETT SUPPLIES FISHING DAY/LANDFALL 68.72 68.72 EYI r 50667 07/18/00 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY-PRRREV 2ND QTR RADIO SRV 45,904..86 45 ,904.86 a 50668r 07/18/00 742110 REGIONS HOSPITAL SUPPLIES /DRUGS 241.09 241,09 1 j 50669 07/18/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.SHEET PROTECTORS 11.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.81 a BACK ORDER - FILE FOLDERS 176.81 396.81 t 50670 07/18/00 820461 JAKE SLABA JULY 4TH 100.00 100.00 41 50671 t]07/18/00 830225 SOFT -CRETE ROBINHOOD PARK SWING ACCESS 2 FOUR SEASONS PARK - ACCESS /PADS 5,675.00 8,375.00 50672 07/18/00 850668 SUPER-I 0R. FORD 1 ' CROWN VICTORIA Z SQUAD. CAR 20, 958.00 2 CROWN VICTORIA SDUAD:'CAR.20,958.00 41; ;916: -00 50673 07/18/00 850672 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MFG. CO STORAGE COUNTf R ` 3'41 1 50674 07/18/00 850674 SUPERI SERVICES JUNE' 2000 RECYCLING '13, 284.83 I'3 284g3 = 50675 07/18/00 850750 LY LE SWANSON MILEAGE MAY 23 TO JUN 29 14.28 MILEAGE - MAY 23 TO JUN 29 14.28 28.56 l 50676 07/18/00 860080 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC ASPHALT 768.86 t' a BITUMINOUS MATERIALS 630.75 1,399.61 50677 07/18/00 860650 TARGET STORES - CSA ACCTS REC C BATTERIES 10.42 POP 53.14 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 28.89 1 POLARID FILM 115.76 208.21 I 50678 07/18/00 860691 KEVIN TAUBMAN FACE PAINTING MID SUMMER NIGHT 70.00 70.00 50679 07/18/00 860710 TAYLOR, MARSHA FITNESS PROGRAM CONSULTANT 1,250.00 1 50680 07/18/00 861611 THE CREATIVE GROUP MARKETING 1,984.00 1,984.00 50681 07/18/00 882830 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVE TOW FOR INVESTIGATION 63.90 63. 90 50682t 07/18/00 890900 U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS COIN -OP TELEPHONES 373.13 373.13 t 50683 07/18/00 890905 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST INVOICE DATED 7 -1-00 55.26 f ' ti US WEST INVOICE DATED 7-1 -00 96.65 US WEST INVOICE DATED 7 -1 -00 86.27 US WEST INVOICE DATED 7 -1-00 57.51 r'US WEST INVOICE DATED 7-1 -00 11587.18 13 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 7t07/14/00 08:1611 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER J FOR PERIOD 07 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 4;US WEST INVOICE DATED 7-1 -419.55 US WEST INVOICE DATED 7 -1 -00 115.02 US WEST INVOICE DATED 7 -1 -00 138.45 US WEST INVOICE DATED 7-1-00 298.00 AlF US WEST INVOICE DATED 7-1-00 86.27 US WEST INVOICE DATED 7 -1 -00 86.27 Fj US WEST INVOICE DATED 7 -1 -00 86.27 3,112.70 k.f 50684 07/18/00 S 901350 HOLLY URBANSKI PETTY CASH - PROGRAM SUPPLIES 8.68 PETTY CASH - PROGRAM SUPPLIES 7.19 PETTY CASH PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6.28 PETTY CASH - PROGRAM SUPPLIES 8.70 PETTY CASH - PROGRAM SUPPLIES 7.18 PETTY. CASH - SUPPLIES 5.70 PETTY CASH - FEES 8,70 PETTY CASH - SUPPLIES 10.60 PETTY CASH - FUEL & OIL 23.81 1 PETM'CASH —POSTAGE 50 f PETTY' CASH ''POSTAGE 1.59 tj r i < PETT ;CASH - 'IRYL & TRNG 9.00 R . S PETPETTY' CASH - REPA I R VEH 9.05':s s; r PEATY 'CASH -FEES 6.62 t PETTY CASH -" FEES .6.81 0;4 r 506 :07/18/00 911600 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER S RAIN JACKETS /5 PANTS /5 VESTS 479.06 479.06 50686 07/18/00 931300 WILLIAM P. WALSH COMM PLBG 217.90 fl t COMM PLBG 272.38 COMM PLBG 272.38-217.90 50687 07/18/00 931860 WASTE MANAGEMENT ADDL TRASH BINS MCMENEMY - JUN 15.56 ADDL TRASH BINS MCMENEMY - JUL 16.85 WASTE REMOVAL - JULY SERVICE 162.35 GOODRIDGE PARK - JULY 2000 333.08 WAKEFIELD PK - JULY 2000 160,89 HARVEST PARK - JULY 2000 167 .74 AFTON PARK - JULY 2000 167.74 1663 CTY RD C - JUNE 2000 270.22 1,294.43 50688 07/18/00 940583 TOM WESTLING INSTRUCTING SOUTH TENNIS PROG 675.00 675.00 TOTAL CHECKS 563,139.33 14 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Payee DesGri tion.A mount 07 /10 /00 07/11/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 761.00 07 /10 /00 07/11/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 26,584.75 07/07/00 07/11/00 CBSA Dental claims 90.60 07/10/00 07/11/00 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 13,437.04 07/11/00 07/12/00 MN state Treasurer Drivers License #697 770.25 07/11/00 07/12/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 32,649.28 07/07/00 07/12/00 Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items 2 07/12/00 07/13/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 692.50 07/12/00 07/13/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 19 07/13/00 07/14/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 590.75 07/13/00 07/14/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 12,482.01 07/11/00 07/14/00 MN Dept of Revenue MNCare Tax 1 07/14/00 07/17/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 612.25 07/14/00 07/17/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 12,113.13 15 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 ALLENSPACH, SHERRY 3 3 9.2 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT i 07/07/00 ALDRI DGE , MARK 2 2 4 7.8 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 BOHL , JOHN C 2 0 7 9.0 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 FLOR,TIMOTHY 2337.15 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 FRASER,JOHN 2134998 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 TAYLOR,KATHERINE 428991 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 TAUBMAN,DOUGLAS J 2121980 DIRECT DEPOSIT '07/07/00 PALMA,STEVEN 2358975 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 JOHNSON,KEVIN 2029.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 HELLE , KERRY DIRECT DEPOSIT 07 ,/0 7/ 0 0 ANDREWS , SCOTT: A 21:41.5 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 HA 1.:. 2 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07 07 00 H T, SIEBER TEVEN 2-.5 4:1 19 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/0,0 /07/0.0 DUNN,ALICE 2240086 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 CORNER,AMY L 77.60 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 MOREHEAD,JESSICA R 93.70 DIRECT DEPOSIT s DIRECT DEPOSIT il 07/07/00 BELDE,STANLEY 2354.54 f DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 RENSLOW, RITA 2 7 6.7 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 BAKKE , LONN A 18 9 4.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 BOWMAN, RICK A 2 02 6.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 KOPPEN, MARVIN 3 3 9.2 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 PIKE,GARY K 2042.54 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 HEINZ,STEPHEN J 2026.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 HERBERT,MICHAEL J 2119.58 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 STO CKTON , DER.RELL T 2 0 2 6.4 3 16 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 ROSSMAN, DAVID A 2 4 05.8 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 HALWEG , KEVIN R 2 8 61.9 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/JUNG STEPHANIE J 15 2 3.2 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 MARUSKA,ERICA 62.30 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 OLSON,JULIE S 1671463 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 BREHEIM, ROGER W 1631.17 DIRECT DEPOSIT ; DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 LARSON,DANIEL J 1451.08 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 THIENES,PAUL 2141.59 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07./07/00 CAL . , COLLEEN J 18 7 0.2 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 CARLSON , THERES E 17 5 4.3 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 0 7 /07 / 0 0 AIDE , SHERYL :.s: 3.2 6 6.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07 .07 00 FAUST., DANIEL F 3 :3528::12 CT REPO SIT rsa.... 07 .07 00 BAUIKAN r GAYLE L 2 30 8`9 DIRECT DEPOSIT O KELSEY,CONNIE L 654.23 DIIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 GUILFOILE,KAREN E 2129.79 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 POWELL,PHILIP 1698.26 DIRECT DEPOSIT k DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 WINGER,DONALD S 3322.37 DIRE DEPOSIT -07/07/00 BAN I CK , JOHN J 2 614.5 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 KARI S ,FLINT D 2 2 8 8.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 KVAM, DAVID 2152.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 RABBETT,KEVIN 2197.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 STEFFEN,SCOTT L 2614.39 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 THOMALLA,DAVID J 2614.55 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT S 07/07/00 BERGERON,JOSEPH A 2729,00 DIRECT DEPOSIT z 07/07/00 GERVAI S JR, CLARENCE N 1980089 17 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK.NUMBER srrrrrrrrrrr CHECK DATE rrrrrsrr EMPLOYEE NAME rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrri AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 LUKIN , STEVEN J rrr+rrrrrrrrr 2 5 7 9.9 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 HAIDER, KENNETH G 4 3 2 8 . i2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 70 /0 /00 PRIEFER,WILLIAM 1961.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 KANE;MICHAEL R 2185.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 LUNDSTEN,LANCE 2374.77 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M 2226.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 ANDERSON,BRUCE 3234.51 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 MARUSKA, MARK A 218 5.6 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 HUTCHINSON , ANN E 17 8 0.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00.COLEMAN , MELINDA 3 2 5 4.13 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07-/00 GRAF ,MICHAEL 1211923 DIRE." POSITDIRE 07 T 0'7 00 ROB8I1S AtrDRA L 127 DIRECT DEPOSIT 0T . 07 00 nATKINKATHERINE m'149- DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 OCR SSON,LINDA 1691923 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 EASTMAN , THOMAS E 2130986 DIRECT DEPOSIT a 07/07/00 STAPLES , PAULINE 2 4 0 0.31 DIRECT DEPOSIT DEtECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 SCHLINGMAN,PAUL 1826.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 LEY , STEPHEN 2 2 4 7.0 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 SZCZEPANSKI , THOMAS J 2282e58 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 WEN Z EL , JAY B 13 9 4.4 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT '07/07/00 DOBLAR RICHARD N 12 44983 DIRECT DEPOSIT t 07/07/00 COLLINS ,KENNETH V 339.27 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 CAMPBELL,CRAIG D 1244.83 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J 243.93 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 ERI CKSON , KYLE F 6 2 6.6 9 18 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK . NUMBER DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT CHECK DATE 07/07/00 07/07/00 07/07/00 07/07/00 07/07/00 07/07/00 07/07/00 j 07/07/00 EMPLOYEE NAME WEAVER,KRISTINE A HAWKINS , LISA A KOEHNEN,AMY McGUIRE,MICHAEL A TRONNES , JOHN E OSTER,ANDREA J URBANSKI,HOLLY S ANDERSON, CAROLE J AMOUNT 875.65 60.05 54.75 4180.37 1244.83 1508 , 03 1352.43 1059.14 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 JACKSON , MARY L 1485963 E DIRECT DEPOSITt" t 07/07/00 TET ZLAFF , JUDY A 13 4 0.8 3 i DIRECTDEPOSIT 07/07/00 CASAREZ, GINA .:1066.91 - .. POSIT : ..1 DIRECT DE .A 07/1--0711 00 ICKES SIIERI Y 680.:64 OSIi/ r 07 07 00 f 5 IARLE JEANETTE E.1. C t DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 JAGOE CARD L 14 01.59 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 OLSON,SANDRA 863974 DIRECT DEPOSIT s 07/07/00 CORCORAN,THERESA M 1343.14 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 MARTINSON, CAROL F 17 51.18 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 EVERSON ,PAUL 1493.54 DIRECT DEPOSIT 0 7/ 0 7 j 0 0 PARSONS , IiURT G 13 8 6.9 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 SPANGLER, EDNA E 4 0 9.0 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 ZWI EG S USAN C.1480.03 DIRECT DEPOSIT z 07/07/00 DeBILZAN THOMAS C 1199.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 EDGE,DOUGLAS 1532903 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 LUTZ,DAVID P 1561.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT f I 07/07/00 MEYER,GERALD W 1619.23 ti ii 1 19 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 NAGEL, BRYAN 1569963 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07 / 07 / 0 0 OSWALD, ERICK D 1565o42 DIRECT DEPOSIT -07/07/00 THOMAS —JR STEVEN 15 3 2.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 DUCHARME, JOHN 18 7 2 .. O 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 PECK,DENNIS L 1978.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 PRIEBE, WILLIAM .2152.41 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M 791.99 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT z 07/07/00 SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES 1561.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 GREW— HAYMAN,JANET M 846002 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 HORSNELL , JUDITH A 12 3 8.5 6 DIRECTDIRECT DEPOSIT 0 7/ 0 7/ 0 0 NELSON JEAN -5 6.9 7 POSIT ..CT DE :.07. 07. ; ::0:0_C OR . :..:AYN , VIRGINIA ? . ..t 164.8... 95 F . D CT DE o I 0 70 00 PRYF PA C ,1TRTI 1.. _63t.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 LIVINGSTON JOYCE L 8.37 e14 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 THOMPSON,DEBRA J 480.66 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 EKSTRAND,THOMAS G 1987.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT F 07/07/00 ROBERTS,KENNETH 2076.71 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT a 07/07/00 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1961.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 KELLY ,LISA 1052958 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 NORDQUI ST , RI CHARD 15 4 4.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT z 07/07/00 OT I S MARY ELLEN M 6 3633o88 Y DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 CHRIST ENSEN,JODIE D 1227.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 COLEMAN,PHILIP 223.69 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 FARR DIANE M 317e DIRECT DEPOSIT , DEPOSITDIRECTD 07/07/00 HORWATH , RONALD J 390.77 20 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY'PERIOD CHECK NUMBER wwrwrrrr CHECK DATE rrrwiw EMPLOYEE NAME wwwwrwwwwwr AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 wwwrwww JOHNSON, MEGAN M wrwwrrrrw 3 03.51 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 LARSON,DEBRA 310.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 MOORE,VANESSA J 628.74 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 SAVAGEAU,STEPHEN D 1393.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT i 07/07/00 SEEGER,GERALD F 391.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT i 07/07/00 STEINHORST,JEFFREY 467.71 6•DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 07./07/00 SWANSON,LYLE 1523.59 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 COSTELLO, SHARON L 311.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 BRAND STROM , RYAN M.12 6.0 0 r DIRECT DEPOSIT 0707 00 ERICKSON VIRGINIA A 2269.47 ti DIRECT :DEPOSIT F 07[07/00 SCHMIDT:, JASON E 1. p . p IJ CT; PSI T 7. o4. 7 Q iFL[IG .MEG- ..:.:: :.2'3 .• < t D C:, DEPOSIT .IRE... T 0 7 0 7. /'..0 0 SV 1E DEN RtISTN 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 07/07/00 PRIEFER,BRIAN W 575.00 t E 79064 07/07/00 CARDINAL,ROBERT J 385.50 79065 07/07/00 WASILUK JULIE A 339.27 79066 07/07/00 INGVOLDSTAD,CURTIS J 102.50 79067 0 7 / 0 7 / 0 0 CUDE , LARRY J 391971 I 79068 07/07/00 EDSON,KAREN L 940.00 79069 07/07/00 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 246.41 79070 07/07/00 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 1630970 79071 07/07/00 JOHNSON,BONNIE 846.23 79072 07/07/00 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1576.27 79073 07/07/00 PALANK,MARY KAY 1751918 79074 07/07/00 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1662.19 21 CIT OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER MM GM MW MW IAM OW— =0 CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME mo omm am now "m *Am am am "o 4im —,mft am AMOUN 79075 07/07/0:0 m "m now mo "m RYAN ,MICHAEL mm mft mo fts a" mm 2935e09 79076 gF 07/07/00 SVENDSEN M 1704942. 79077 07/07/00 BARTZ 2745*92 79078 07/07/00 BUSACK,.DANIEL P 1337*63 79079 07/07/00 KONG,TOMMY T 1244*.83 79080 07/07/00 W.ATCZAK 193-6e83 79081 07/07/00 WELCHLIN V 2152e46 790-82 07/07/00 MEEHAN 2268*21 79083 07/07/00 MORNING L 1237.12 FI 790-84 07/07/00 SHORTREED ,MICHAEL P 2531*45 79085 07/07/00 i CHLEB`ECK JUDY, M 15 74 0.8 07/07) f, 0`16 84''6-IVE AMY.5.75. 77 . 9' .09 07 [07 0 71]L kS 'BE N.,`;-7G 79 07/07/00 ELIAS,BRIAN J 8:00 00 79089 07/07/00 FREBERG RONALD L 1590*43 79 -090 07/07/00 JONES,DONALD R 1355e03 79091 07/07/00 ELIAS G 1978*43 790.9290 07/07/00 EPM .XELI S SA K 852e80 79-093 07/07/00 LINDBLOM 2267e23 79094 07/07/00 EDSON, DAVID B 1590e43 7909590 07/07/00 HELEY,ROLAND B 1590*43 79:096 07/07/00 HINNENKAMP 1544o99 79097 07/07/00 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 1532*03 ii 79098 07/07/00 LINDORFF P 1561963 79099 07/07/00 LUND,,ERIC 720*00 22 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER fto ow A" amp mom mm CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT' I "o "a 79100 am wb s "mom ow 07/.07/00 irdw wmo am am r.aw aw.rr mm am mm NAUGHTON W rramnom am "a am a " 4 6:0 0`10 7910-1 07/00 NOVAK,MI CHAS L J 1199e23 j 7910:2 0-7/07/00 PATTERSONITERRILL T 9-20*00 79103 07/07/00 POSSERT 756*00 79104 07/.07/00 RODRIGUEZ RAUL J 722 6:0 79105 07/07/00 TAYLOR JENELLE L 144. 79106910 07/07/00 UJDA KRISTEN L 198. 79107 07/07/00 MACYIRITA 112*13 79108 07/07/00 MCCUSKER.ELIZABETH A MANNING 242*25 79109 07/07/00 WEGWERTH A 1508.03 79110 07/07 ANDER, SON EVERETT 178.6 19 7911-1.07/17 E ET GQR-. RMON 50 . as Ll 12;XARJ R-I E 33, .3 7911.3 07/07/00 WENGER ROBERT J 184490:3 79114 07/07/0-0 BALLESTRAZZE,THAD M 392o60 79115 07/07/00 BRAND STROMMARY C 67o5-0 79116 07/07/0-.0 BUSMAN M 585.00 79117 07/07/00 FINN S 1360*83 79118 07/07/00 FLUGIELAINE R 603o00 79119 07/07 FORTIER, SARAH S 579.69 79120 07/07/00 FRANK 640e00 79121 07/07/00 GEBHARD R 373.75 79122 07/07/00 GLASS M 347*88 79123 07/07/00 HUOT 40900 79124 07 KRUMMELIJOSEPH C 140.00 23 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER wo ow mm mm CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT am mom "m me mi am 79125 07/07/00 am am "m am ii fte am-am om i am Mw l mw-,Mm am -am ri ii LINN L 000 "M V 00`r i MW *AM i GM "M 596a,0-0 79126 07/07/0-0 MCBRIDE D 0 5.6080 79127 07/07/00 NELSON, _HEATHER N 2 70 a 00 75128 07/07/00 k NIENCZYK N 146.25 79129 07/07/00 NORGAARDBETHANY i 478e00 79130 07/0-7/00 PE-HOSKI,CAITLIN M 62!6,6 00 79131 07/07/00 RUBBELKE , SARA A 55,o00 79132 07/07/00 SCHOEN W 154.00 79133 07/07/00 SHOBERG,KARI A 1.4 0 00 79134 07/07/00 SIKORA, PAUL T 36.00 79135 07/ 07, 00*.PAAR R.30--6e00 7913 6 r. 0 'Q. 77-/.-0-0 AR 4. 2 5 1-37"07/07 _0 Ei-RN''El KATIE M *.00 : 79-138 07/07/00 ZIELINSKI I,JOSEPH R 64. :0 79139 07/07/00 GERMAIN, DAVID 1573963 79140 07/07/00 NAD E-AU , EDWARD A 2185*63 79141 07/07/00 SCHULTZ . SCOTT M 1408.07 79142 07/07/00 DISKERUD,HEATHER A 35*50 79143 07/07/00 GLASS, JEAN 726*59 79144 01/07/00 HOIUM,SHEILA 944920 79145 07/07/0D K-AR—AS, TAMARA A 785*40 79146 07/07/00 OGREN A 246973 79147 07/07/00 POWERS L 338*30 79148 07/07/00 RIDLEHOOVER,KATE I 200e58 79149 07/07/00 SALZBRENNER,HEIDI T 294*65 za CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79150 07/07/00 too SCHMIDT 1251e23 79151 07/07/00 SEVERSONI CHRI ST INA M 159*84 79152 07/07/00 SHOBERG,CARY J 615*11 79153 07/07/00 SMITH.AMY L 241.40 79154 07/07/00 ABRAHAMSON Lo 477o25 791.55 07/07[0-0 ANDERSON I jULI E X 210.84 79156 07/07/00 ANDERSON ,TIMOTHY R 260*10 79157 07/07/0D BITTNER C 766. 7915:8 07/07/00 CHAPMAN , JENS A 477972 7-9159 07/07/00 CMIEL,NICHOLAS S 46*2-0 07/Q7/00 -,DEMPSEY BETH M 120: 7 9 161 0 1 -07 DeGRAW -,,KRYS,, AL 3- 79 162 07 017/ O CKSO1.1 - 'AERI 4- CAROL0 2 79163 07/07/00 FERRI S E CHRISTINA M 164 :. 79164 07/07/00 FLOR,,MARY PAT 46e5-0 79165 07/07/00 FONTAINE,ANTHONY 24930 79166 07/07/0-0 FRETZ J 333*94 79167 07/07/00 FRUCI,REBECCA L 68925 7916.8 07/07/00 GRUENHAGEN C 258905 79169 07/07/00 HAGGERTY,,KATHRYN A 138*00 79170 07/07/00 HAGSTROM,LINDSEY S 70*00 79171 07/07/0-0 HA-WKE.,,RYAN A 656.01 79172 07/07/00 HEIM,ANDREA J 137e00 79173 07/07/00 HEINN L 645*35 79174 07/07/00 HILLS,CHRISTINE M 29925 25 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79175 07 / 0 7/ 0 0 HOLNGREN , LEAH M 6 3 7.4 l 79176 07/ 07 / 0 0 HORNING, CHRI STOPHER M 85975 79177 07/07/00 HO JLE,.DENISE L 116 * 1.0 79178 07/07/00 HUPPERT, ERIN M 576.96 7 07/07/Go IKHAXL, JOHN 255075 79180 0 7/ 0 7/ 0 0 JOHNSON , ROBERT P 3 4.4.8 8 79181 07/07/00 JOHNSON , ROLLAND H 164,40 79182 07/07/00 JOHNSON, STETSON 31.50 79183 0 7/ 0 7/00 KAHLER , BRADLEY G 7 8.0 0 79184 07 / 07 / 00 KERSCHNER, BRANDON R 2 3 0.7 5 7 18 7/ 0 7 / 0 0 KERSCHNERI JOLEN `M 4 3 8. C01. 7 91.8-.6 is t ;: ..0.7.. 0 7 _ _0 0 KOEI-IITEN J[ARY :11:7.4 7791.8 07 0 00 s IIE:I S E L . T EAM -8I2 Y 5- ,. -..12 7,918-8 07/07/00 MEVERDEN , LAURA: J 20 9.6 0 79189 0 7/ 0 7 0 0 MOS SONG , ANDREA M 191.7 5 79190 07/07/00 MOTZ, ERIN M 255.73 79 191 07/07/00 OFREAGAN,CHRISTINE 19.25 79192 07/07/00 OLSON,ABIGAIL E 120.25 79193 0 7/ 0 7/ 0 0 OWEN , JONATHAN 36.0o14 79194 07/07/00 PEHOSKI,JOEL T 260.10 79195 07/07/00 SCHAEFER,ROB J 277988 79196 07 / 07 / 0 0 SEXTON, ALAYA LANI 18.0.0 79197 07/07/0:0 SHERRILL,MASON D 619.25 79198 07/07/00 SIMONSON, JUSTIN M 542.52 79199 0 7/ 0 7/ 0 0 SMI TLEY , SHARON L 119s40 26 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER rrrrr'r CHECK DATE rrrrrrrrwrr EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 79200 07/07/00 rrrrrr rrrrrrrr+rrrrr STEINKE, JACOB P rrrrr.rrrr. 165.4 79201 07/07/00 SWANER, JESSICA 403.85 79202 07/07/00 THELL., HEIDI 90. 79203 07/07/TIBO-DEAU,.NEATHER J 80.75 7.9204 0 7/ 0 7/ 0 0 WARNER , CAROLYN 39 o 8 0 79205 07 / 07 / 010 WED ES , CARYL H 117.00 7 9 2 06 07/WELTER , ELIZABETH M 2 0 3.0 5 79207 07/07/00 WHITE,NICOLE B 76938 7920 07 / 07 / 00 WHITE , TIMOTHY M 91.4 3 79209:07/07/00 WHITING,ROBIN A-139075 7 9 1.0.07/07/00 WI LLIAMS , KE1Y 9;7 9':11 79211 07. 07 0of /WOODMAN ALC E...., .44 ; 7 92 12 07/ / 0 0 WORiTA, LNSAY :..M: • .,, . • ,. :.w ar :.:19 3 2 3 79213 07/07/00 ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L 353.12 79214 07/07/00 BERGUM, TANIA S 43.75 79215 07/07/00 BOSLEY, CAROL 141.45 79 216 07/07/00 FLEMI NG , KATHY A 121.8 8 79217 07/07/00 FLEMING,LAURA C 48.75 79218 07/07/0 :0 GROPPOLI, LINDA M 145.25 79219 07/07/00 HORNING,DANELLE M 87000 79220 07/07/00 HUPPERT,ERICA L 189000 79221 07/07/00 JOHNSON,NANCY A 54.00 79222 07 /07J00 SCHRQEDER,KATHLEEN 79223 07/07/00 SHERFtILL,CAITLIN A 79224 07/07/00 ANTON,SARAH E 219.95 248.31 340.17 27 328051.89 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT I FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME irtoo w AMOUNT 79225 07/07/00 mwr.irwrrrr BEHAN,JAME:S r..r+rw` 1304.03 79226 07/07/00 BESTLAND,NICOLE R 13 .0D 79227 07/07/00 BLAKESLEY,JEFFRY D 88000 79228 07/07/00 BI CHARD,KEVIN J 18.9 79229 07/07/00 BOTTOLFSON R.36.00 79230 07/07/.00 CHAPEAU, GREG M 414.55 79231 07/07/00 DOUGLASS,TOM 1920 00 79232 07/07/00 GRENDZIISKI, DIANE J 174.83 79233 07/07/0:0 HEMPFER,NICHOLAS W 6.30 79234 07/07/00 JAHN,DAVID J 1334.88 7.:9235 07/07/00 KOSKI JOHN .7F 836- 03 E s f. 9 Z 36 0 0 7 00 FKYRK.:ASHLEY:..r Y ' .8 O 7 0 7..: ..0 IYRK B 1EANNA.: K ; 79238 07/0-7/00 LONETTI , JAMES F 3 8 9.9 4 79239 07/07/00 MATTESON,FRANK M 264940 79240 07/07/00 MORIN,TROY J 150.00 79241 07/07/00 PATTERSON,ALBERT 598.42 79242 07/07/00 PRINS,KELLY M 232.35 79243 07/07/00 KEILLY R 723.60 79244 07/07/00 S EVERSON ,HOLLY A 36.00 79245 07/07/00 YOUNG,DILLON J 283.80 79246 07/07/00 AICHELE,CRAIG J 1388.83 79247 07/07/00 MULVANEY,DENNIS M 1727.23 79248 07/07/00 PRIEM, STEVEN A.1560.03 328051.89 Agenda No. 6 ' — Action by Council AGENDA REPORT Date Endorsed Modified Rejected To: Acting City Manager Kenneth Haider From: Chief of Police Donald Winger Subject: Authorization For Program Participation Date: July 12, 2000 Introduction The City of Maplewood and the Police Department have an opportunity to continue involvement with an alcohol compliance program administered through the University of Minnesota Council approval is sought to continue participation and accept funding to offset expenses. Bround In conjunction with a University of Minnesota study, the Maplewood Police Department has participated in an alcohol compliance program. This program involves yearly checks of all our on- and off -sale liquor establishments using trained underage purchasers. By participating in the study, the City will be reimbursed for the wages paid to the - officers and trained purchasers. The amount reimbursed will be approximately 2,600. Similar studies, performed in other parts of the country, indicate that when compliance checks are made on a regular basis, adherence to drinking age laws is considerably greater that when the compliance checks are not done. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council. approve participation in this program. AGENDA ITEM NO _ 3 AGENDA REPORT To: Acting City Manager Kenneth Haider From: Chief of Police Donald Winger Subject: Donation to Maplewood Police Reserves Date: July 17, 2000 Introduction Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified Rejected The Maplewood Police Department Reserve Program has received a X500 donation from the White Bear Avenue Business Association, Background For the past several years, the Maplewood Police Reserves have assisted with the Ramsey County Fair and Parade by providing traffic control and atrolli ngthefairgrounds. P To show their appreciation, the White Bear Avenue Business Association has made a donation to the Reserves and asked that the donation be used to purchase equipment for the Reserve ro ram.P g Recommendation It is recommended that approval be iven,to accept 'PP g pt this donation and the money be used to purchase equipment for the Maplewood Police Reserves. Act i. on Requ i red Submit to the City Council for review and approval.' DSW:js AGENDA nSf MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review - Nursery School LOCATION: 47 Century Avenue South APPLICANT: Lutheran Church of Peace DATE: July 7, 2000 INTRODUCTION Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified Rejected The conditional use permit (CUP) for a nursery school at the Lutheran Church of Peace, 47 Century Avenue South, is due for review. BACKGROUND April 26, 1973: The city council approved the CUP for the nursery school. June 14, 1982: The council approved a CUP revision to increase the allowable number of students fro30to 40— Referto the _- minutes -on page 4. August 12, 1985, August 13, 1990 and August 14, 1995: The council renewed the CUP for five years. DISCUSSION The church is operating the nursery school according to the CUP requirements. Staff sees no reason to periodically review this permit. The council should review this CUP again only if a problem arises or if the applicant proposes a change. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit for a nursery school at 47 Century Avenue South again only if a problem apses or if the applicant proposes a change. p:secl - 28Vcpeace.cup Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. June 14, 1982 CUP Requirements Attachment 2 i8 11 r a 1 13 17 13 rg.,13 4qzv 14 0 a IS 14 0 ° t7 16 135 13013ou135 13 - 139130L 13S !3! UPPER AFTON ROAD 66o CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL D 622 o . i t SUPER AMERICA DRUG STORE c — (s)zi i•:i•.•::.• ::i :::i•: • i • ~ fi • • :: • :.. • i i• .: iti .L.•;.;• •L iii :.ii i i•:S : ii Ze .iti : :: • : i : : : ':i ; :: • ti•: iii :S•j; : i : •: i:ii • •i : i i : ~ja :;• :: i ui Z W 704 > • Hwu. Drat - wage U:tch Esv t. ' Q 10 O.N 34070 5-24-43 9t ac I 1597901 8 /28/4.3 t2S `17 L0 ----- -___ -- - -- r 5 (r.73 ac. o Z COUNTY , W 6' V 0 pm N SPAC ' L 7) 180 s03' X i O' Rd. Es ntl SIJYJ Io3ac. 190 ins 91 in • N Attachment 3 1. Special Use Permit: 47 S. Century — Lutheran Church of Peace a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing on the request of Lutheran Church of Peace for a special use permit revision to increase the number of allowable students at any one time from thirty to forty children. The Clerk stated the hearing notice was found to be in order and noted the dates of publication. b. Manager Evans presented the staff report. c. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. d. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. e. Mayor , Greavu closed the public hearing. f Councilmember Anderson moved to. a special.exceptfon permit revision for the operation of a preschool program to increase the. number of allowable students at anyone time from thirty to fort children` at ; the Lutheran Church of Peace, 47 South Century, sub the following 'conditions: 1. Correction of all Life Safety and Building Code deficiencies,_- prior to the 1982 - school year. - . "'`' a'r :- ....- ..y.... - s - • . • . .. • •. .- : --• • ' •• :: - : . - ... - _ :_ i _ - •' 4 2. If no nuisance conditions exist -- at the' end. of three years, the permitermit may -- be renewed by the City Council._ _ Approval -is recommended --on . the %=basis - that • ::= = 1. 'The proposal is consistent with the intent -of the City Code 2. The proposal will not substantially change or detract from the use of the neighboring or subject property. 3. The proposal is in the*best•interests of the community and public welfare 40 -There have not*been.any nuisances or complaints during the past nine years of operation. •. -. - _ • Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes —*Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers. Anderson, Juker and Maida 2 _ 6/14 r • .. •.' •.. _ .r •-. a .. s .. ...°.rw...ro. _ _°- •r.01 ?• • t. • e _ -. .; •_ . .. a .. .. i..• - .• «..•.. . •.. .. r ••.. °.. •.• •- i • !lam. •i .•. •r . %ice • _ J • • •. • _ lop Y 4 AGENDA TIM NO, s MEMORANDUM Action by Council TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas date Ekstrand — Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review — Excel Air Systems indorsed Y ModiffiedLOCATION: 2075 Prosperity Road DATE: July 7, 2000 Rejected INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit (CUP) for the building expansion at Excel Air Systems, 2075 Prosperity Road, is due for review. BACKGROUND August 9, 1999: The city council approved this CUP. Refer to the CUP conditions on page 5. DISCUSSION The applicant has completed their addition and has complied with the plans and the city council's requirements: There is no reason for periodic reviews. The city council should review this permit again only if a problem arises or if the applicant proposes a change. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit for Excel Air Systems, 2075 Prosperity Road, only if a problem arises or if the applicant proposes a change. p:sec151excelair.cup Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. August 9, 1999 CUP Requirements Attachment 1 a AVE . iEXTAN AYE. COO g Phalan N RgTOrFG&qD LOCATION MAP 2 4 N Attachment 2 zb 4 - - -- - - -- -- - -_ _ S OfrOAa ,o e UN Y o 1 Ira « • I 0 si 8 O 79 .. .r•. T 9 9.03 + 7O 14 1 i op h 5, 7 6 5 1 .I N ;.. rf'' mo Zcam} L _ Q „ T1 .._. cam. 46 44 f - o r 6 1.901291 P) Y ) 20 , Z1 2Z 23 Z4 25 2 N 31 2a 26 Z5 Z 22 I t to 6 _ 9pJt •• M M , N O 7 • 7ZIle1 - t9.o t i0 En P _ a a BUR E Q` AVE . ^' 33 To I toCCondaf,n ne d Doc 1509 5 24 3- l 4C .. w . ... L"' z Q I ( 2121 - • 1 012 3 7 7 6 5 •4 13 2 ci ZA --- — —- •' - - - - 2115 13 \ _I I X. 10 I Q I202{ 2Z 23 t 24 t5 2 . •2111II Y I .. .. .. T 9 4q 4o a •• 1 86.4• ~ 7t. Condcmhed . 150G •• L 22.40 ' • ••• 439.0 13 9 . 5 565.6 .2095 Q'125• 25•t 4,2095 i O 3 N 2 f f-2081 2080Q EXCEL AIR O 5) SYSTEMS ti C A Ailr o 00 ILO 1-3 s Y4 OF NM1 4 St- coll a•3 .six. I 2053 ® •s• T, 1 2049 2044 8 68 , 210.5 .• - . • 0 .V p'11 L- .} 0, 7 ors 1 in/01 , 2041 q. 4 ,.,r.. Z 1 969 ( 11 9 I IrINEv&oEN c o E'. _ GREAT LA 4C5 iPE - aw ab _15 57.50 3 . « • 1 15 J# 3 esy t to M: r.0 3) (3-9) 1 one 2 3 oil 4 co O 2 ( N s' 7 ?5 T T5 T '5 t A — s AVEoy . —Ro AV PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP PROPOSED EXCEL AIR SYSTEMS SITE EXISTING EXCEL AIR SYSTEMS SITE 4 N 3 Attachment 3 loo (E-5j 0w y 1 ` r ! T` + 4 ft-ft.OPP al V t dI t •• s Iw J IIf'•', • • • r j ` i I ISM rte• . r / % .! ` , { % - ` / ` . r PRO p . ADDIT14N r a f ; . %• , , , EXISTING O BUILDING • i s N SITE PLAN 4 4 N Attachment 4 1 The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 20 The use would not change the existing or planned. character of the surrounding area. I The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 60 The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. Storage outside the building is prohibited unless allowed by the city council. 5. The hours that business may generate noise that can be heard off -site are: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday — Friday and 8 a.m. to 12 noon Saturday. Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Councilmembers Kittridge, Carlson, Allenspach Nays - Mayor Rossbach Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the plans date - stamped June 23, 1999 for the 7,570- square -foot addition to Excel Air Systems, Prosperity Road. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: 5 Agenda l7 "" (o MEMORANDUM Action by Couai1 TO: Ken Haider, Acting Cit Man g r Dare ddorse :. FROM: Bruce K. Anderso Di o rks a d Recreation EnEn di Rejected _. ....DATE: July 18, 2000 for the Ju 2 0 ity Council Meeting SUBJECT: Change Order No. 3 for the MCC Fitness Center Expansion and Final Acceptance of the Project INTRODUCTION The City of Maplewood received certificate of occupancy for the new fitness center expansion at the Maplewood Community Center on July 5. The project is now substantially complete with the steel beams needing to be primed and painted as the only remaining project. The fitness center expansion approximately doubled the space of the existing fitness center facility and the existing and new equipment has been relocated to the upper level. BACKGROUND The City Council entered into a contract with James Steele Construction to complete the community center fitness center expansion of approximately 2000 square feet. The project is now substantially completed with the exception of painting of the outside steel columns. There are two outstanding invoices totaling $7,143.30. The two invoices include the cost for the new audio visual equipment, which is five televisions which run on a short band audio frequency to permit individual viewing based on visual preference. The second item is installation of emergency exit lighting at the top and bottom of the stairs and at the mezzanine level which is required by city code. These two items complete all costs beyond the contract. The funds for Change Order Number 3 will come from the R.A.C. fund which has adequate monies available. Staff recommends that the project be accepted based on the architect, city staff and city building official recommendations. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve Change Order Number 3 for $7,143.30 with the monies to allocated from the city's park acquisition fund and furthermore, that the project be accepted as recommended by the architect, city building official and parks and recreation department director. kdWitctr3. mem Agenda Item # 6 AGENDA REPORT MEMORANDUM Action by Council TO: City Managerg Date FROM: Greg Finn, Recreation Program Assistant Endorsed RE: Budget Change - Youth Sports Clinics Modified ul 10 2000DATE: T y Rejected INTRODUCTION Due to the expansion of your youth sports clinics (seven new clinics), an expenditure increase in the amount of $9,700 is needed to pay for contracted services and to purchase program supplies. The additional clinics will produce an additional $14,530 in revenue. CT TKANAASV I am requesting the following budget changes: Expenditures: Fees for contracted services: 206 - 603- 217 -4480 $9,500 Increase Program supplies: 206 - 603- 217 -4120 $ 200 Increase Total expenditure incresse: $9,700 Revenue: Additional Registrants: 206-000-217-3641 $14,530 Increase RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council approval of the requested budget changes. Agenda # (S r 9 AGENDA REPORT TO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager I FROM: Karen Guilfoile ' City Clerk DATE: July 17, 2000 RE: Recording and Transcription Equipment Purchase Introduction Action by Council Date Endor Mod" The recording and transcription equipment that is used in the Council Chamber's and in the City Clerk's office is the equipment relied on to record and used to transcribe the permanent minutes for City records. The recording equipment is also used for the purpose of recording the City's Planning Commission minutes. Background Our current equipment is approximately 15 years old. The transcription machine broke while transcribing the minutes of the July 10th meeting and parts for it are no longer available. While we have a service contract on the recording equipment, we have had periodic problems with recording and muffled voices that the repairman contributed to the age of the equipment and the inability to obtain new replacement parts. Recommendation It requested that Council approve the transfer of funds from the contingency account, not to exceed 3,700.00, for the purchase of replacement equipment per a verbal quote from Lanier. From: "Goedderz, Jenette" <jgoedder @lanier.com> I Block address To: pattfry_2000 @yahoo.com Subject: FW: Advocate Pricing Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 09:3 8:03 -0400 Add Addresses Please review and call me with any questions. In the mean time, I will talk to my manager about the quote from 4th Quarter. Thank you so much and take care, Jenette Original Message - - - -- From: Goedderz, Jenette Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 11:56 PM To: 'patt @' Subject:. Advocate Pricing Importance: High Sensitivity: Confidential Patt, Sorry this is so informal -It is pretty late and I know you needed this in the morning. Also, do you need a VOR /Time injector -which time and date stamps each piece of recording? Please let me know if you do and I will add this to the quote. We do not have any specials on this product this quarter but I will include a 20% discount on the proposal. Thanks so much and call me with any questions. Sincerely, Jenette-Goedderz City of Maplewood Proposal for 7/18/00 Advocate V 3 Advocate Transcriber 1 Foot Control 450,00 Headset 25.00 Less 20%892.00) Final Investment Price $3,568.00 Installation is not included in this price and would be approx. 200.00 if Lanier service needs to install. Advocate V Recorder ADVOCATE V RECORDER Model LCR -5 The Advocate V recorder is a four - channel recorder, providing up to six hours of unattended recording time on standard cassettes. The reliable and economical Advocate V is perfect for recording courts of record, various legal proceedings, business and professional conferences. When used with the optional VOR/Time Injector, the Advocate V recorder can record telephone and /or radio traffic. It will also provide the date and time for each call. FEATURES Dual action recorder: Up to six continuous hours of recording Automatic changeover: Ensures complete docu- mentation Microphone inupts: Eight XLR jacks No erase head: Prevents unintended erasure Prerecorded tape sensor: Prevents recording over previous information Record level indicators: Ensures proper record audio level Three position security /cassette lock: Ensures cassettes are undisturbed Built -in automatic search: Allows easy access to important recorded segments Four - channel recording: Allows separation of voice tracks for more accurate transcripts Backup power supply: Preserves LED display in case of power outage Transcribe Capability: Can be used for transcription Optional unidirectional and omnidirectional micro- phones Optional Remote Display Unit Optional VOR/Time Injector Optional Transcriber Sp e c ift cations on other side AGENDA TTBM NO,, MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Design Review PROJECT: US West wireless Monopole LOCATION: 1194 County Road C DATE: July 17, 2000 INTRODUCTION Project Description Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified Rejected Dale Casper, representing US West Wireless, is proposing to install a 75- foot -tall monopole for telecommunications equipment. They want to install the monopole to replace an existing light pole that is west of the existing parking lot and south of the existing building at 1194 County Road C (Lakeview Lutheran Church). (Refer to the maps and plans on pages 6 -10 and the statements on pages 11 and 12.) There also would be equipment boxes on a pad near the base of the monopole. US West would screen the east side of the base area with asix- foot -tall brick screening wall and enclose the remainder of the area with achain -link fence. Requests The applicant is requesting that the city approve: 1. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a monopole and related equipment in an M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning district. 2. The design and site plans. BACKGROUND October 10, 1994: The council approved a CUP to expand the church. This approval was subject to three conditions. August 12, 1996: The council again reviewed the CUP for the church. January 13, 1997: The city council adopted the commercial use antenna and tower ordinance. DISCUSSION The 1996 Federal Telecommunications Act does not allow cities to prohibit the installation of telecommunications facilities and equipment. Because of this law, local governments may only regulate, but may not prevent, the installation of monopoles or other telecommunications facilities. As such, the city may only base their decision about this request (or any other similar request) on land use and on health, safety and welfare concerns. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses all telecommunications systems. This licensing requires that the proposed or new telecommunications equipment not interfere with existing communications or electronics equipment. If there is interference, then the FCC requires the telecommunications company to adjust or shut down the new equipment to correct the situation. Maplewood must be careful to not limit or prohibit this tower (or any other tower) because of electronic interference. That is up to the FCC to regulate and monitor. As part of their site selection process, US West noted that they could not find an existing structure within one -half mile of this site that would meet their needs. In fact, the proposed site appears to fill -in a gap in their coverage area. (See the map on page 13.) The city council should approve this request. This project meets the requirements of the Maplewood tower ordinance and the criteria for a CUP. As proposed, the tower would be about 100 feet from the northeast corner site (the southwest corner of the property at 1200 County Road C). The city code requires at least a 100 -foot setback from a property used for residential purposes and a setback of at least 30 feet from a street right -of -way. Much of the base area and the lower portion of the monopole would be screened by the existing building and by the proposed screening wall. The applicant is not proposing to add any trees to help to screen the base area from the house to the northeast. The city should require the applicant to plant trees on top of the hill that is to the north and east of the existing church parking lot to help screen the base area from view from the homes that are northeast of the site. (See the site plans on pages 8 and 9.) The site design, with the additional tree planting, would be compatible with the adjacent church and parking lot. It is important for the city council, when reviewing this or similar applications, to balance the interests of the applicant, the property owner (the church), the neighbors and the city as a whole. The proposed location maximizes the use of existing trees on the church and neighbors' properties and the church building to help screen the proposed tower from the homes to the north and east. In addition, the proposed location provides some screening of the site (especially the base area) from the north. The proposed site balances the interests of the church and US West Wireless in having a tower site on this property and the neighbors who want the tower screened from all their views. In addition, the city has approved similar monopole facilities at three other churches in Maplewood that are near residential neighborhoods. These include Christ United Methodist Church on Hudson Place, Presentation Church on Kennard Street and Trinity Baptist Church at 2220 Edgerton Street, just south of Highway 36. 1 am not aware of any complaints about the monopoles after their owners installed them. Church Conditional Use Permit When the city approved the conditional use permit and the design plan for the church in 1994, they required the church to build a trash enclosure and restripe the parking lot. The church has not yet completed these two items. The city should require the church or the applicant to complete these items as part of this request. In fact, the church should complete these items even if US West does not build the monopole. If the applicant does not proceed with the monopole, or if the city council denies the CUP, the church still needs to build the trash enclosure and restripe the parking lot. COMMISSION ACTION On June 27, 2000, the community design review board recommended approval of the design plans for this proposal. On July 6, 2000, the planning commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit. 2 RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on pages 14 and 15. This resolution approves a conditional use permit to allow up to a 75- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment. This approval is for the property at 1194 County Road C. The city bases this approval on the findings required by the ordinance and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plans dated May 26, 2000, as approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4.. The applicant or owner shall allow the colocation of other providers' telecommunications equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions. 5. Any antenna that is not used for a year shall be deemed abandoned and may be required to be removed. 6. The applicant or US West shall post a bond or other guarantee with the city to ensure proper removal of the antenna and monopole and the restoration of the site. 7. Before the city issues a building permit for this monopole, the church shall build a trash enclosure (as required by the 1994 CUP approval for the church) and restripe the parking lot. B. Approve the site and design plans date- stamped May 26, 2000, for up to a 75- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and equipment to the property at 1194 County Road C. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued permits for this project. 2. Before the city issues a building permit, city staff must approve a landscaping plan for the property. This plan shall show the planting of a mix of Austrian Pine and Norway Pine trees to the northeast of the existing church parking lot on the hill. These trees are to help screen the base area from the homes along County Road C. These trees shall be at least eight feet tall, balled and burlapped and shall be planted in staggered rows. 3. If the landscaping or trees are not installed by the completion of the tower, the city shall require the applicant to provide a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed within six weeks of occupancy. 4. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 3 CITIZENS' COMMENTS City staff surveyed the 12 property owners within 350 feet of the proposed site. We received one reply that said "no problem." REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.66 acres Existing land use: Church and child care center SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Future Forest Products Shop across County Road C South: Kline Auto Dealership West: Vacant property and Park and Ride Lot across Highway 61 East: Single dwellings on the south side of County Road C BACKGROUND September 8, 1977: The city council approved a CUP for an addition to the church. August 14,1989: The council approved a CUP for a day care facility at the church. August 13, 1990 and August 14, 1995: The council reviewed and renewed the CUP for the day care and required another review in five years. PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: C (church) Zoning: M -1 (light manufacturing) Ordinance Requirements Section 36 -607 requires a CUP for a communications tower in any zoning district other than residential. The ordinance allows a maximum height of 175 feet. However, the tower must be set back from any adjacent residential property the height of the tower plus 25 feet. Findings for CUP Approval Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council must base approval of a CUP on nine standards for approval. Refer to findings one through nine in the resolution on pages 14 and 15. Application Date The city received all the application materials for this request on May 26, 2000. State law requires the city to take action on this request by July 25, 2000, unless the applicant agrees to a time extension. 4 p:sec9 /1194ctyc.mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Site Plan (Enlarged) 5. Proposed Elevation 6. Applicant's statement dated May 11, 2000 7. Letter dated June 13, 2000 from Dale Casper 8. Nearby and Proposed US West Wireless Site Map 9. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 10. Project Plans date - stamped May 26, 2000 5 Attachment 1 Q CO M'nY R0. Q v j • 3. 4 LIIDIA AVE 8EJ1M AVE a 8fJ1M EO NC4O 07 Q db KoWmw L Z IAorMlarn KWWMN AVE 1 COl1NTY C s an caio,, t; aw nv CT. _ E TART AVE AVE. oERvNS eve. oEtwys fiRANdVEM1 AVE VNf1M OR. SHERM AVE to-Lim /u ie Ke&w AVE co, 10. wum rte. LELAW QORiE AV LN. EI.aR OGE AVE aim BE (N SKI AV 1E. AV E ELAONf AYE AV. LOCATION MAP 6 4 N Attachment 2 R. L• VISA d 079 r ( N3 'ib i6• •' bfs c r °. E ia 4 Al IS-4 TIMBE &TURF r 3oais•1I o0 ob 4 CITY OPEN SPACE f` ; W 3 oFUTUREFOREST, - No AW 1215 1227 i Irk / • PRODUCTS SHOP - d 0! 3 W .4i r "' • _ Ge6 9 100 t J `r % ,• "_ -. ' - - ,,, „ • . 1 imAk : IlLs 449 ! 137 1 M 4!a S71- COUNTY ROAD C. WNe •sa ! -is T 7 _ w 1 , C fee.-T AftV .l' -1 It It O 121® N o N N 2633 aI ,a 1194 .2631 l met p -23 e Q'• ,.. , 2625 4 2co . 621 I /L - 144 2617 ''` ,a`Q • V 102) •V i r 0 j old sum 3011Z ,'3 w4 yip S , J M t 22 ' *. tee ds) ` ) o W SO *t ao • ; o y L ' + tit. r O _ , W Z`t4t5 i 9 9 . vo NG 3°POND( 21 ?A 'I "` 1 I K . g1" :1 13 03) 3 ;S!. > ` 17 Ib 89} n Q P. d p a v v m ^ 7 r , Dr ..47 E E • 12 • t 141 .7 f fJ r t 1 1b3 • , - Y ` 15 / .. o.rreecss it - • s• o 1 J v 74 ; ... 't 14 13 ' 044 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 N EAST COUNTY ROAD C o EXISTING SIGN N o C1 MAILBOX--- ; J EXISTING MANHOLE (TYP.) EXISTING TELCO PEDESTAL (TYP.) W O EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC (TYP.) PL PL J CL Pt J a EXISTING WOOD POLE (TYP.) J a US WEST ANTENNAS (TYP.) US WEST METAL POLE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT a PC EXISTING PC BALLFIELD o PL PL Pt. PL PL PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) J CL J a 0 00 -Q 0' 50' 100' SITE PLAN 0 5 -W t Attachment 4 EXISTING EXISTING CHAIN LINK BALLFIELD BACKSTOP BRICK WALL EXISTING h REMOVE EXISTING WOOD POLE & STREETLIGHT US WEST ANTENNAS TYP.) X X EXISTING CHAIN LINK BALLFIELD BACKSTOP EXISTING h BALLFIELD ENLARGED SITE PLAN SITE PLAN ENLARGED) 9 ROUND WALL. 6 FT. HT. x 12 FT. LONG INSTALL EXISTING LUMINARE ON NEW MAST ARM AT EXISTING HEIGHT US WEST METAL POLE EDGE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT 5-26 -c0 N 3' -0" LIGHTNING ROD US WEST ANTENNAS (TYP.) US WEST METAL POLE. BEYOND EXISTING 75' -0"WOOD POLE INSTALL EXISTING LUMINAIRE ON NEW MAST ARM AT EXISTING HEIGHT REMOVE EXISTING WOOD POLE BRICK WALL, BEYOND BUILDING US WEST EQUIPMENT, EXISTING EXISTING BEYOND BUILDING SIGN BUILDING CPS ANTENNA LAKEVEEW LUMMAN CHURCH 1, EXISTING EXISTING I I CONCRETE SHRUBSCURB nP•) I lid EXISTING GRADE EAST COUNTY ROAD C AT EQUIPMENT s— 06 -ao NORTH ELEVATION 0 8'16' SCALE: 1/8" r ha ca o PROPOSED ELEVATION Z 1 e ozN• 2 A I cq O A in U S WEST Wireless, L. L.C. 426 North Fairview Avenue Room 101 St. Paul, MN 55104 Attachment 6 fife!; better here May 11, 2000 City of Maplewood Director of Community Development 1830 County Road B East Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Dear Zoning Department: U SWest Wireless L.L.C. is proposing to replace an existing light pole on property owned by Lakeview Lutheran Church and construct aseventy -five foot (75') high metal communicator pole with an attached PCS antenna array and accompanying equipment cabinets. The existing luminaire will be installed on a new mast arm at the existing height and mounted on the new pole. The equipment cabinets will be recessed under an indentation in the church building and surrounded by a wooden fence on the south side to screen the equipment from sight. This proposed communication facility site should be approved by the City of Maplewood because this request falls within the city ordinances for Telecommunication Antennas, Towers and related equipment The communications facility is proposed on a primary land area for tower requiring CUP and there is no other tower or building within a one -half mile radius that U S West Wireless can co- locate on or attach to. If you have any questions or comments, I can be reached at (612) 250 -8624 or by fax at (651)642 -6942 Sincere) t Dale Casper Site Acquisition Coordina r USA 1 Proud Sponsor 36 USC 380 11 U S WEST Wireless, L.L.C. 426 North Fairview Avenue Room 101 St. Paul, MN 55104 Attachment 7 ObWE=ST life's better here June 13, 2000 Mr. Kenneth Roberts City of Maplewood Community Development 1830 County Road B East Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Dear Kenneth: Per your request 1 am forwarding 16 copies of a map which shows previously existing U S West Wireless sites and our proposed site at Hwy 61 & County Rd. C. The purpose of this map is to help the Planning Commission, City Council and Community Development staff better understand our need for the proposed site at this location. Our objective is simply to fill in a coverage gap that exists in our system. The proposed site is centrally located between the existing sites and will give our network continuous coverage which we now do not have. If you have any questions or comments, I can be reached at (612) 250 -8624 or by fax at (651)642 -6942 Sin rely; 4 Dale Casper Site Acquisition Coordinator U S Q 01, 1 Proud Sponsor 36 USC 384 V E Attachment 8 NEARBY AND PROPOSED US WEST WIRELESS SITES 13 4 N CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION Attachment 9 WHEREAS, Mr. Dale Casper, representing US West Wireless, applied for a conditional use permit to install up to a 75- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 1194 County Road C. The legal description is: Speiser's Arbolada, subject to road and vacated road accruing, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, in the north one -half of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN's 09 -29- 22 -11 -0050, 0051, 0052) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On July 6, 2000, the planning commission recommended approval of this request. 2. The city council held a public hearing on July 24, 2000. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 14 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plans dated May 26, 2000, as approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant or owner shall allow the collocation of other providers' telecommunications equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions. 5. Any antenna that is not used for a year shall be deemed abandoned and may be required to be removed. 6. The applicant or US West Wireless shall post a bond or other guarantee with the city to ensure proper removal of the antenna and monopole and the restoration of the site. 7. Before the city issues a building permit for this monopole, the church shall build a trash enclosure (as required by the 1994 CUP approval for the church) and restripe the parking lot. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 2000. 15 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA THURSDAY, JULY 6 2000 V. NEW BUSINESS A. U.S. West Telecommunications Monopole Conditional Use Permit (1194 County Road C East) Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. He then answered questions from the commissioners. Dale Casper, the site coordinator for U.S. West Wireless, had no additional comments but thanked staff for the presentation. He said the KSTP site would not work for an antenna because of interference with the AM towers. The engineer for U.S. West Wireless stated that there was no way they could collocate on the KSTP tower because AM towers are electrified. He said they are required by the FCC to work with the two nearby stations so as not to interfere with the signals. According to the engineer, the 150 -foot tower could cover a range of 3 miles, depending on the population (number of users), and the topography of the area. Commissioner Pearson moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adopt the resolution which approves a conditional use permit to allow up to a 75- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment. This approval is for the property at 1194 County Road C. The city bases this approval on the findings required by the ordinance and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plans dated May 26, 2000, as approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant or owner shall allow the co- location of other providers' telecommunications equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions. 5. Any antenna that is not used for a year shall be deemed abandoned and may be required to be removed. 6. The applicant or US West shall post a bond or other guarantee with the city to ensure proper removal of the antenna and monopole and the restoration of the site. 7. Before the city issues a building permit for this monopole, the church shall build a trash enclosure (as required by the 1994 CUP approval for the church ) and restripe the parking lot. Commissioner Frost seconded. Commissioner Rossbach commented that there were other areas on the site that would be better suited for location of the antenna, such as the "tongue area" or the back of the building near the existing trees. He felt the location chosen was most convenient for U.S. West to service the antenna and shelter their equipment. Ken Roberts replied that one reason this site Planning Commission Minutes of 07 -06 -2000 was chosen was so that the monopole with a new light attached could replace the existing telephone pole. Ayes—Fischer,. Frost, Pearson Nays - Rossbach, Trippler Abstention Thompson Commissioner Thompson arrived at the meeting at 7:27 p.m. and abstained from voting on this item. The motion passed. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JUNE 27, 2000 VI. DESIGN A. U.S. West Wireless Monopole, 1194 County Road C (Lakeview Lutheran Church) Secretary Tom Ekstrand presented the staff report. He answered questions from the boardrnembers. Mr. Ekstrand noted that there was only one neighborhood comment and that person indicated he did not have a problem with the proposal. The applicant was not present at the meeting. Boardmember Shankar moved the Community Design Review Board: B. Approve the site and design plans date- stamped May 26, 2000, for up to a 75- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and equipment to the property at 1194 County Road C. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued permits for this project. 2. Before the city issues a building permit, city staff must approve a landscaping plan for the property. This plan shall show the planting of a mix of Austrian Pine and Norway Pine trees to the northeast of the existing church parking lot on the hill. These trees are to help screen the base area from the homes along County Road C. These trees shall be at least 8 feet tall, balled and burlapped and shall be planted in staggered rows. 3. If the landscaping or trees are not installed by the completion of the tower, the City shall require the applicant to provide a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed within six weeks of occupancy. 4. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Boardmember LaCasse seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. City of Maplewood Official Sign -Up Sheet By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes. Name (first &last) - please print Address 2 • 4 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. AGENDA MEN N04 a r MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Building Setback Variance, Conditional Use Permit, Parking Waiver and Design Review — SuperAmerica LOCATION: 1750 White Bear Avenue Action by CouncilDATE: July 7, 2000 INTRODUCTION Project Description Date Endorsed Modified Rejected Oam SuperAmerica (SA) is proposing to demolish their convenience store, fuel islands and fuel island canopies at 1750 White Bear Avenue and build a new facility. The proposed store would be a 3,086- square -foot, one -story brick building with a hip roof. The proposed station would have six single - island fuel dispensers beneath a new canopy that would serve up to 12 cars. Refer to the maps and drawings on pages 1 0-14. (The present station has a 2,376 square -foot convenience store with two rows of pumps. There are eight fuel dispensers in each row. SA can currently fuel 12 to 16 cars at a time.) Requests The applicant is requesting: 1. Approval of a 15 -foot building setback variance for the proposed 15 -foot setback from the North St. Paul Road right -of -way. The code requires a 30 -foot setback. Refer to the letter on page 16. 2. A conditional use permit (CUP) to change a nonconforming use. This station is a nonconforming use because it is closer than 350 feet to residential property, its fuel vent stacks are closer than 204 feet to residential property and the pavement setbacks are insufficient. Refer to the letter on page 15. 3. A parking waiver to have seven fewer parking spaces than the code requires. The code requires 16 parking spaces —the applicant proposes 11. 4. Approval of site, landscape and architectural plans. BACKGROUND On March 24, 1997, the city council approved a similar request by SA for their station at 11 South Century Avenue. SA demolished their building, fuel islands and canopy and rebuilt a new convenience store, canopy and fuel pump island. Like the current proposal, the council approved a CUP because the site was also closer than 350 feet to residential property. The council also approved a parking waiver permitting 11 parking spaces instead of the required 15 spaces. DISCUSSION Building Setback Variance Staff does not agree with the proposed building setback variance. Even though the site is oddly shaped, there is room to provide a 30 -foot setback from North St. Paul Road. Any parking lost on the north side of the proposed building can be added in front of the store. The existing building, furthermore, meets the required setbacks. It is difficult, therefore, to say that the lot shape "necessitates" a variance. Conditional Use Permit 350 -Foot Proximity to Residential Propertx In spite of the code requirement fora 350 -foot setback from a residential lot line, the proposed fuel station and convenience store would be a huge improvement over the existing facility. There would be two fewer fuel dispensers (six instead of eight) so the amount of activity would not increase. The pumps would also be arranged in a more functional manner than the two existing pump rows. The existing rows create conflicting cross traffic within the site. Customers also presently park in the center of the site between the two pump islands further hindering traffic flow. 24 -Hour Operation This SA station is presently open 24 hours. The applicant proposes to keep these hours. The city code says that major motor fuel stations must be closed between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. The code _allows the council to approve stations to stay open longer as part of a conditional use permit. Staff does not object to SA's hours. Their current 24 -hour operation has not been a source of complaints. Staff does not see any benefit in restricting their hours since they have been functioning a long time without problems. Fuel Vent Stacks The code requires that tank vents be at least 200 feet from a residential lot line. The existing ones are 100 feet away from the residential lot lines across White Bear Avenue. The new vents would be 185 feet away —an increase of 85 feet. The new vents would also have a vapor - recovery system that would provide a safeguard to prevent fumes. Even though they would not be set back 200 feet, the new vent stacks would be an improvement: One neighbor said that she can smell fumes sometimes when the tankers fill the station's tanks. The proposed increased setback and vapor - recovery system should improve this occasional nuisance. Pavement Setbacks City code requires that paved areas be set back 15 feet from street right -of -ways: Currently there is no setback along either street frontage. The applicant proposes to widen the on -site green space along both street frontages. This is an improvement over the current site plan. 2 Parking Waiver As with the remodeled SA station at 11 South Century Avenue, there is basis for a parking waiver. Fuel station /convenience stores do not need as much parking as a store by itself since most customer vehicles are already parked at the pumps. The applicant needs a parking waiver to have only 11 spaces instead of the 16 spaces the code requires. Staff is not aware of any parking problems at any of the convenience store /fuel stations in Maplewood. Site Plan Comments Staff recommends approval of the site plan subject to the applicant changing the building setback to meet the code. Design Considerations The proposed building would be attractive. The elevations drawings do not show the trash enclosure, however. Staff recommends that the applicant build a brick enclosure to match the proposed building. Landscaping The proposed landscaping would be attractive. The wrought iron fence proposed worked out nicely at the SA station at 11 South Century Avenue. Neighbor Concerns Two neighbors across White Bear Avenue asked about the status of the monitoring wells on their's and SA's property. The applicant explained that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency PCA) is monitoring this situation. The applicant said that there is no evidence of spreading soil contamination. The PCA will continue to monitor this. One neighbor is concerned about the sign on the canopy glaring in their windows all night. An option may be to place signs on the ends of the canopy instead of the front (west) side. White Bear Avenue Corridor Study During late 1999 and early this year, the City of Maplewood was involved in the White Bear Avenue Corridor Study. This was a joint study with the City of St. Paul, the City of Maplewood and the White Bear Avenue Business Association. The consultant in charge of this study prepared a report regarding the "Avenue" with specific goals and guiding principles for the corridor. The SA proposal meets these principles since the plan would: Improve connectivity between land uses and districts along the avenue. The new building would contribute to the overall character of the street. Build on existing strengths. Create a safer street. The proposed renovated site would sustain these goals and principles by providing an increased green area with appealing landscaping and wrought iron fencing, an attractive building and a more functional site plan. 3 COMMITTEE ACTIONS June 27, 2000: The CDRB recommended approval of the 15 -foot building setback variance, the parking authorization and the plans. July 5, 2000: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP and parking waiver. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Deny the 15 -foot building setback variance for SuperAmerica's proposed convenience store at 1750 White Bear Avenue. Denial is based on the following reasons: I There are no circumstances that are.. unique to the property that warrant the proposed setback variance. The applicant can adjust the site plan to meet the required 30 -foot building setback from the North St. Paul Road right-of-way. 2. The existing building meets all required setbacks without the need for a variance. 3. The proposed reduced setback would not meet the spirit and intent of the code since visibility would be obscured from the adjacent property to the northeast at their North St. Paul Road driveway. B. Adopt the resolution on pages 19-20 approving a conditional use permit to rebuild and enlarge a motor fuel station at 1750 White Bear Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding fuel tanks, fuel spillage, monitoring wells, any contaminated soil, etc. C. Approve aparking- reduction waiver to allow 11 parking spaces (five fewer than the code requires). The city is approving this request because: 1. Most of the customers that would be in the store at a given time are fuel customers who would leave their cars at the pump islands. 2. A reduction in the parking requirements is justified to create more efficient traffic flow within the site. E D. Approve the plans date - stamped July 5, 2000, for the redevelopment of the SuperAmerica fuel station and convenience store at 1750 White Bear Avenue. The owner shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit: a. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. b. Plans for the design and placement of the trash enclosure. The trash enclosure shall be large enough for refuse containers and any recycling containers the applicant may use. The trash enclosure shall have gates that are 100 percent opaque and extend to the ground. c. A revised site plan showing: 1) A 30 -foot building setback from the North St. Paul Road right -of -way. 2) The driveway access on White Bear Avenue with a width of 36 feet to have an entrance Kane, a left -turn exit lane and a right -tum exit. These lanes shall be marked with painted arrows on the pavement depicting the turning movement. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. b. Install reflectorized stop signs at all exits and a handicap- parking sign for the handicap- parking space. c. Install and maintain an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas. d. Screen the roof -top mechanical equipment as proposed. e. The site lights shall not exceed the maximum light intensity required by code. The lights beneath the canopy shall be flush mount. The lenses must not drop below the bottom of the canopy. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5 5. This approval does not include the signs. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. CITIZENS' COMMENTS I surveyed the 33 property owners within 350 feet of this site. Of the 13 replies, six were in favor, two had no comment and five neighbors had comments. In Favor 1. The SA station is a good neighbor. The updates will be good. (Minnhealth PA, 3220 Bellaire Avenue) 2. Sounds nice. No problem. (Staff of HealthSouth, 1812 North St. Paul Road) 3. It is a positive change. (Knutson, 9235 Knollwood Drive) 4. It would be an improvement for the area. (Meister Investments, 1977 6th Street) 5. Anything that improves the area is great with me. Sounds like a better improved convenience store which is a good thing. (1735 Van Dyke Street) 6. We are for the plan. (Owner, 1834 North St. Paul Road) Miscellaneous Comments 1. Got Milk? (Bottari, 1789 White Bear Avenue) 2. Any pollution issues for old tanks? Any effect on the monitoring well that is already in our yard? Where will the new driveways be? Where will the garbage area be and will it be totally enclosed? Where will the new lighting be in relation to current site and will there be any increase or decrease in the level of lighting or brightness? Any traffic or noise changes as a result? Is it coming closer to White Bear Avenue? The vapor recovery system sounds good if it will reduce the fumes when they're filling the tanks. We're immediately across the street from the north side of SA and wonder how the proposed changes might affect what we see, hear and smell from SA or if it will become more challenging to get out of our driveway. Thanks for asking! We look forward to more information with interest. (Sturm, 1759 White Bear Avenue) 3. We can do without the 2 foot by 23 foot illuminated sign shining all night through our home. I would also like to be informed about the results of samples taken from the monitoring well on our boulevard. When we bought our home, the realtor said that the well would only be there about six months. Well we've been here six years and it is still there. They even added another one up the street. We have never received any information about the monitoring well and I would sure like to know what is going on. (Smith, 1733 White Bear Avenue) 4. Since 1993, an environmental company has been testing the soil around Super America. I am located at 1721 White Bear Avenue want to know the amount of contaminants that have leaked from spillage of gasoline from tank leakage onto my property address this issue and clean up the first damage before going on to a new adventure. (Tschida, 1721 White Bear Avenue) 5. Refer to the letter on page 18 from Howard Heller, Kin Properties, Inc. 7 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 35,284 square feet (.81 acres) Existing land use: SuperAmerica Station SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Cruber's Hardware and the former Mid America Bank South: North St. Paul Road and Blockbuster Video West: White Bear Avenue and single dwellings East: Parking lot for the former Mid America Bank PAST ACTIONS (Other Stations) The city council has approved CUPs to expand these motor fuel stations which are closer than 350 feet to residential property: April 11, 1988: The HCO Fuel Station at 2228 Maplewood Drive added a fuel island canopy. July 22, 1991: Joe Fleming, at 2271 White Bear Avenue, removed his old building, fuel - island canopy and pump islands and built a new facility with a convenience store and service garages. September 28, 1992: Ray Muckala, of the Holiday Express Station at 743 N. Century Avenue, added a pump island, enlarged his fuel - island canopy and remodeled his building. February 14, 1994: John Fleming, at 9 N. Century Avenue, added a new fuel - island canopy and pump islands. Mr. Fleming also received a variance to place his new canopy closer than 15 feet to Century Avenue. March 24, 1997: SuperAmerica, at 11 South Century Avenue, removed the old building, fuel - island canopies and pump islands and built a new facility with a convenience store. PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: BC (business commercial) Zoning: BC Code Requirements Section 36- 151(b)(9)(c) does not allow motor fuel stations within 350 feet of a residential lot line. Section 36 -17(e) allows the enlargement of a nonconforming use by CUP if it would not affect the development of the parcel as it is zoned. 0 Section 26- 22 (a)(9) requires that a motor fuel station have four parking spaces plus one for each 200 square feet of floor space for the store. (We consider the spaces at the pumps to serve as the first four spaces.) Section 36- 22(b )(5) requires that parking spaces for "high customer turnover" use be 10 feet wide. Convenience stores fit this category. Criteria for Variance Approval State taw requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance from the zoning code: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 2.. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance Undue hardship', as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used. under conditions allowed by the official: controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. criteria for CUP Approval Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may grant a CUP, subject to the nine standards for approval. Refer to the resolution on pages 19-20. Application Date We received these applications. on June 1, 2000. State law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a proposal. City council action is required on this proposal by August 1, 2000. p:sec141sa- remod.2 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Building Elevations 5. Canopy Elevations 6. Applicant's CUP request dated May 19, 2000 7. Applicant's variance request dated May 19, 2000 8. Memorandum from Dan Soler of Ramsey county dated June 19,. 2000 9. Letter from Howard Heller dated June 20, 2000 10. CUP Resolution 11. Plans date- stamped July 5, 2000 (separate attachment) 9 V V ILA L111111.l1 LV 1 ooioW AOL aOWLreW.4m w ELINL -Aftm-ah AVL howWL oahws ML aaNws vara oR — O ca eo. UuaE Ra a....r uuwuwe g M p UMA+o I ao, um A& :s iu+cna+ AVL b e 9 oo. im. • w ML JWL asailm a (I 0 AE vE UL Bo.roMr AS g 15 do I SILL IM E w S10L111AM /NIE NARItlS IAIE IIOSEM000 ANG li. AN AV. /11E. ?. FROST GOEF El CO&AW now FFME ML q by r w pm so 1% it awmoN rwE. LOCATION MAP 10 t Attachment 2 Al 17) tdf. 1, L, 90 .. No" 1S 13 - - -- ' a , o C44 (1) TAkt'• R AO a= --- -- — = FORMER 40) MIDR AMERICA 1 N BANK C3a) C 1783 1 _ I e_ o a 1 r 5 - j .1779 loo S) 1773 o * Y 0 GRU BERS 53 1769 { 35 1763C o r175921. 0C9) 1753 In 1 1743 ! SA31 • 1 20 r I • 9 11) 1733 17-) zl 1721 i7) 21 1717 E 1709 BURGER {I` z 3 j - Z+) IA.) KING o Q F-- 1834 C/) p) -4 0 T 1)) 'l8 no 141. 8 i 17 9b 16 o _ 15 (Zo)0 - O : SOUTH eO • CHINA Doc * 2G? 55 74 ISLA -`, - ; s - , ' C004 • • ,' e zlo 74 l / 29 5.14 _ . 1.2 Z at. W 1 1 S_441! 3s 7+0 °' — —ISO— — 40 C2°) • (18)., (1-1) ) BIG APPLE 0 11 l6 ' ' a s ? BAGELS ( +Loa 49 ., l s , ri 4s W-7? 6o coo 0S A ` N '' ^ o. O9, g A1 o.3G a r N'" _ _ - r' q - Ii ni - • - PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 11 so 4 N d r N'" _ _ - r' q - Ii ni - • - PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 11 so 4 N n V VQV I IIIICII . J to a. a I IRt Ic i 1 1Pl 0 / t x L6?Q.1?ZiI i SM MAN PREPARCD FROM SUMT MPARRD Srr SUNOL LAW SURVCr1Ni LLC TLLlPmw *a S0M4" W" To "VCT rm ADo LOT ow ime" ASH aroRwttoN rat core LArOuT PRroR TO CONs"WCnOK 2. CURBS AM OUSENNOWD TO PACE OF CM. 3. SUILORNS, AND ISLAID COMPM WITH CANOPT Aft LOCATID PROM TWe WWTweAiT PROMMY CORNER, AND ALNWD VeRPeWCULAR/ PARALLEL TO M NORTH ROPCRTT LINE. LO L US INOICAM DIMRMMT ON TM PLAK 4. UNUM OHM OTNelWN! ON THIS WAV44% CONTRACTOR SHALL PROW CONTROL JOD(M CONRTRt MOM JOINM AND MANSION JWM IN SLAG ON SRAOe, IMeWALU AND, ORIVK oDIIT N- JODM IM11alI1fl IWTUM WALCM- If O., ALL OTN W W O.C. SAW CUT CONTROL JOINTS moamum ONE -OAVM CO"IT! TMCK !SL dAl UM JMT tl11101 MTAWb WALU- 24 Of., ALL OTIlRS- 40 DOWL. ALL exPAMKON JOINTS- MAXWO 14 D.C. srm Icfftw r. LAMOSCAMI G,tl:e11 ARM See IMM Lt prT -•TWXT pARKM $TALL$ STRIP" - 4 WIDE STALL LDim USE KWON VISMILM MMITe PAM. MACK PROVIOeD 1131 ISLAW SIRv= POMTS 10' -0 mw SeNCRAL PARCH W ." ACC99WSLt PARKING WITN M LOADS Zoe S % pppopA AND PAVVEMOT MA ZOMG rROV1 RMMS 0! M *In No" V'NI LM, MMM PAWOM 7 STRPPINS S SITUMIN0IM PAVwG. we SWAN. M DePTN CONCRM Ap"OACW V%W ANA 9MLAR TO DETAIL to DEPTH CONCRETE Gub-cm-wee WIN ~. 0 -d" c wM. MESH 11 STmm GTRUCTURe Pet WTAL Gee GNe" SP3 AND SP4 POII PURTM STORM WWCR INPORMATIOK n w my. r Du ememem FtLLtO SOLL " am. oeTAIL A. SOU.W MOUMM 'DISASWTT PARKINS ONLr• SIGN KR OTL L SOLLARD MOUNTC RIO PARKINS' SIGN a T SHAPeD mpeNceR 06AND CAMWV. veRtrT Srn, PLAcm##T, caLU+N AND FOOTDM SIZt WITH CAM" AND STRUCTURAL PLANS. CANOPT SRAPHICS PCX OWMtL 14 CDN=Te ULAWS WITH n%W DISPeMUML otsPeWeR Pet Owant. M UND"SROIMD PRlL STORAK TANKS PTR OWNtR PROWOt PIP" ' AI! VeNTING KR OWNERS SPeCIFICATIOWL U Nt ACMS RAW PLR DETAIL V exTMX TRASH 11MCLONRtt Pa ARCNfTtCTU AL PLANS. M AWTO PHONC WRN CWWTt POOTM P" DETAIL "M SITE PLAN 12 4 N Attachment 4 Fv4r"*w METAL FA901A PAMM MW VIKrL AFFt.1Ea LOdOrM F'AWA MYOK LLY WTVO4ALLY LL 4NA= K.LtMN = Ow AOANILT SMIM*E u"E+woM"s• LosO rm wx 9" Poor" W LOGOTM S" FR>g"SHW MRAL TRIM PREMSHW METAL 3FASCIAFAMNTM F*LIaA STRWW ANOP= ALL" sI 9"TW FACE BRJCK DANICEr FCAVE FATTIM FACE ORICK SOLOWIt WOW FACE am" IK OO &PwAwrkA L M KES ELEVATM WOW NORTH ELEVATION MJAIALT 9HMKE ROOFMb METAL TRIM FRMN'SHW METAL FASCIA FARL 1"M APPLIED sTRIPMO FACE OR" SOLVOt caim FACE DR" W Z s Y J MY k r Wsr4r EAST E WOW MC P caw r $"Di l MW Rim MW METAL PANEL 1"rTM s k" OASICET PArTM It" GOLDIOt tluc w •r-r 13 I Iwrebp artify Owt "" PO specifioatko. or repel we pnporsd by me or w+der my Gd supervision, area " 1 am o duly registered Arc&Ud under t Iowa of ft State of wwwsoto Dote Reg. No FAGS sit i... =.. ..... Chocked Cy MDK 4 CW.O. OSJfI= V t 00.43A" JUN 12000 G0.4J f A301 UL-.J%1:001L.u U o. I d I mmoi 0 2000 b fl +y°s J.se!•, Ra. ca ASMOL.T ShNNKE O RDOFIN6 N FPO "SHOP METAL TRIM Q' FRtf`MNSFED METAL FAWA PAHL wTH APPLIED STRlPIN6 to _p FACE OR" BASKET MEAVE PATTERN V1 FAGS DRK.K SOLDIER FAGS sit i... =.. ..... Chocked Cy MDK 4 CW.O. OSJfI= V t 00.43A" JUN 12000 G0.4J f A301 UL-.J%1:001L.u U o. I d I mmoi 0 2000 b fl +y°s J.se!•, Ra. SMA f . 9 A ENV 17 p MlTNK A lt71M1CN Apr p"N ~ ~ itiWrop. A N M Ilb R We Mu OANOr MIhA 0'ITMI V . I 0 D fi n 3 D C+ Cn S QA r V1 Attachment 6 ATTACHMENT TO THE APPLICATION OF SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA, LLC TO REBUILD ITS PRESENT CONVENIENCE STORE AT 1750 WHITE BEAR AVENUE Speedway SuperAmerica is proposing to build a new store and fuel dispensers at its present 36,649 sf wedge shaped site at the intersection of White Bear Av * enue and North St. Paul Road. The existing 2376 sf store would be demolished and a new, 3086 sf store would be built in the northeast coiner of the site. The new store will provide service 24 hours each day, seven days a week. The new store would have a hip roof, be all earth tone brick with a basket weave soldier course, and a matching masonnr trash enclosure. The rooftop equipment will be located in an alcove cut into the hip roof and the open edge will be screened. The present dual pump islands, one parallel with White Bear Avenue, one parallel with North St. Paul Road, will be combined into a single "T" shaped canopy parallel to White Beal Avenue. The present eight tandem dispensers will be replaced by sit parallel dispensers. Eight parking spaces and the handicapped accessible space will be provided in front of the store, and twelve spaces are provided at the pump islands. In our experience his arrangement provides more than adequate parking at similar sites allowing confident approval of any necessary parking waiver. The existing four dr ive%vays will be retained, but relocated away from the White Bear A17enue l North St. Paul intersection. The 35 ft width of the northerly drive to North St. Paul and the 36 ft southerly drive to White Bear Lake allows sen7ice to the relocated underground tanks. The underground tanks will be moved from the north part of the site to south. They will be reoriented from perpendicular to White Bear to parallel to White Bear and the intake vent pipes will be relocated from at the White Bear property line to the North St. Paul property line, 85 ft from White Bear Avenue. Most important, a Stage One Vapor recovery system will be installed, creating a closed system between the tanker and the underground tanks during filling. Landscaping will be greatly enhanced at the site. First, the mature trees along North St. Paul Road will be preserved. Along White Bear we are proposing a masonry and wrought iron fence where there is no green space or buffer now. The fence %vill be identical to the fence installed at our store located at Centur and Upper Afton. This fence has worked well as an alternative to the a green strip at small, and in this case a wedge shaped, sites. The fence will be carried around into the point" formed by the intersection of White Bear and North St. Paul. This area, now only sod, will be enhanced with a backdrop of Crab trees, and a planting bed of Da Lilies, Juniper and Spirea. A group of Ci - abapple trees 'will anchor the northwest corner of the site, and Mugo pines will be extended alone the blank wall of our neighbor's building. Norway Pines and Amur Maples will enhance the Northeast corner along North St. Paul. All green areas, approximately 20% of the site, will be irrigated. The following sign package is proposed: Building: 1. Integrated into the fascia, 2, 1.5 ft x 15 ft non illuminated "SA SuperAmerica" 45 sf 2. Above door %%ray, SA logo, illuminated, 2.5 x 3.5 sf 9 sf 3. On Building face 4 ft x 6 ft "SuperMom's" 24 sf Canopy: 4. Long side to White Bear Avenue, 2 ft x 23 ft illuminated "SA SuperAmerica" 43 sf Freestanding 5. One, 26 ft tall 112 sf May 19, 2000 15 V air a Attachment ATTACHMENT TO THE APPLICATION OF SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC FOR CERTAIN VARIANCES TO PERMIT REBUILDING OF ITS PRESENT CONVENIENCE STORE AT 1750 WHITE BEAR AVENUE 1. Reduction in building setback from 30 ft to 15 to 19 ft along North St. Paul Road as shown on the site plan a. The requested variance will allow Speedway SuperAmerica LLC to demolish the present building and dispenser islands, construct a new and competitive building, reorganize and improve circulation and traffic floe- on the site and install significant landscaping and other features and continue the present use of the site. Absent this variance this new investment could not be made. t . b The request is necessitated by the unique wedge shape of this site, and .our inability to privately acquire additional area to expand. The most efficient design places the building and then the dispenser islands in the widest part of the site. Even with the building at the Widest part of the site a variance is needed to accommodate and maintain a safe and efficient relationship of the building to the dispensers to the roadways. c. The requested variance is the minimum necessary to allow redevelopment of the site. It Will effect 57 ft (3(7(- of the 2.500 North St. Paul Frontage and will not create conflicts or precedents for the adjacent developed and commercially used site. Approval of the requested variance Would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Code by allowing reinvestment in this uniquely shaped site to allow the present use to continue and improve. It Will gain the City the benefits of a site rebuilt to modern standards, including appearance, circulation and relocation of the underground tanks and filler vents. 2. Reduction in the required spacing of the underground tank filler vents from 200 ft to approximately 185 ft from the nearest residential property. Presently the Vent pipes are located on our white Bear Avenue property line just west of the store, 100 ft ( the width of the right of way) from the nearest residences. a. The hierarchy of the organization of our site places the store in the widest part, the dispensers and their circulation needs in the next, and then the underground tanks in the remaining portion. The vent filler pipes must be proximate to the tanks. The conforming location of the tanks Would be under the dispenser island and perhaps a part of the store. Neither a possible location. The vents haJ7e been relocated as, fai as possible from the residences under these constraints. b. The underlying problem is the wedge shape of the site. C. The new location will improve the essential character of the area by allowing the Vent pipes in a location more in conformance with the Code. d. In addition to moving the Vent pipes approximately 85 ft farther from the residences, a Stage One Vapor recovery system will be installed, creating a closed system between the tanker and the underground tanks during filling. This eliminates the dispersion of almost all vapors in the air, addressing the intent of the spacing requirement. May 19, 2000 16 RAMSEY COUMY Department of Public Works Paul L. Kirkwold, P.E., County Engineer Daniel G. Schacht, P.E., Acting Director ADMINISTRATIONALAND SURVEY 50 West Kellogg Blvd., Suite 910 St. Paul, MN 55102 • (651) 266 -2600 • Fax 266 -2615 E -mail: Public.Works@co.ramsey.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Tom Ekstrand City of Maplewood Dan Soler I e n. Ramsey County Public Works SUBJECT: Speedway Super America White Bear Avenue at North Saint Paul Road DATE: June 19, 2000 pr . i s The Ramsey County Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed conditional use permit and site plan for Super America at White Bear Avenue and North Saint Paul Road. Ramsey County has the following comments regarding this proposal. 1. The existing Super America site has four access points, two on White Bear Avenue and two on North Saint Paul Road. The proposed site plan also identifies four access points, two on each road. White Bear Avenue is an "A" minor arterial on the County system. Because of the nature of this roadway the County is attempting to limit the number of direct access points. Ramsey County will allow one access point onto White Bear Avenue. This one driveway should be located as far north as possible. The County will allow both access points onto North Saint Paul Road. 2. The proposed project will require a permit from Ramsey County for the reconstruction of the access points onto County right of way. The project will also require a permit for the installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer on county right of way. Thanks for the opportunity to make comments regarding this issue. If you have any questions or need any additional information please give me a call. Attachment 8 ENGINEERING /OPERATIONS 3377 N. Rice Street Shoreview, MN 55126 651) 484 -9104 • Fax 482 -5232 17 Minnesota's First Home Rule County printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10% post- consumer content C, ,. IIFSCME is.or Attachment 9 KIN PROPERTIES, INC. 77 TARRYTOWN ROAD SUITE 100 WHITE PLAINS, NEW YORK 10607 -1620 HOWARD E. HELLER GENERAL COUNSEL June 20, 2000 BY MAIL & FAX 651- 770 -4506 ThomasfEkstrand- Associate Planner Office of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 TELEPHONE: (914) 683 -8080 FAX: (914) 683 -8088 LV r vu 7 Re: Our Property #347 - 1804 North St. Paul Road, Maplewood, MN Dear Mr. Ekstrand: Reference is made to a letter which you have prepared as of June 8, 2000 concerning an application which the City has received from SuperAmerica. The application calls for the demolition of the existing store and gas pumps and reconstruction of a new convenience store, gas pump islands and canopy. The above - captioned property is located across the street from the property subject to the application. There was an environmental discharge at the property subject to the application. As part of determining the extent of the contamination plume, it was necessary for consultants retained by SuperAmerica to install a monitoring well on the above- captioned property. Based upon the preexisting environmental issues, please note that the owner of the above - captioned property opposes the granting of the application in question unless as part of any approval it is mandated that SuperAmerica complete the clean up at its location and fully remediate any contaminated soils and ground water. If SuperAmerica wishes to pursue new development, it should only occur if it has cured the problems which have arisen in the past. Very t r yours, Howard E. Hell HEH:dp F:\ DATA\ WPDOCS \CORRESP\Jun2000WUN -20.HH 18 Attachment 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, SuperAmerica Group, Inc. applied for a conditional use permit to enlarge their fuel station and convenience store. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1750 White Bear Avenue. The legal description is: ALL OF LOT EIGHT (8) EXCEPT THAT PART LYING NORTH OF AND NORTHEAST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINES: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT EIGHT (8),3.22 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EAST ON A LINE 3.22 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT EIGHT (8) TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF A LINE 3.53 FEET SOUTHWEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT EIGHT (8); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON SAID LINE 3.53 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT EIGHT (8) TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT EIGHT (8), SAID LINE BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTH ST. PAUL ROAD, IN BLOCK ONE (1), MEISTER'S HIGHLANDS, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On July 6, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on July 24, 2000. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 19 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police _and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7: The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the - site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes: 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding fuel tanks, fuel spillage, monitoring wells, any contaminated soil, etc. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on July 24, 2000. 20 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JUNE 27 2000 VI. DESIGN B. SuperAmerica, 1750 White Bear Avenue Secretary Tom Ekstrand presented the staff report. Mike Cronin was present representing SuperAmerica. He requested that the board accept the two - driveway plan as approved by Dan Soler, the county engineer. Mr.Cronin described the materials and signs proposed for the building. He said the mechanical units are in a well on the top of the building and buffered on three side by the roof. According to Mr. Cronin, SuperAmerica is looking at the feasibility of extending a canopy from the fueling points back to the store. All the sources of Fight would be above the deck of the canopy so there would be no lateral light. Mr. Cronin described the photometric plans that were given to the board. Mr. Cronin explained that a soil sample sent to the MPCA in 1993 showed petroleum contamination. Eleven wells (10 to 12- foot -deep tubes with screen lining for the last six or seven feet) were then constructed, nine on -site and two off -site. The water that seeps into these tubes is checked on a regular basis to see if it is contaminated. The results of these checks is that the contamination is contained but has not evaporated. As part of this proposed construction, the underground tanks will be moved and measures will be taken to correct the contaminated soil. Mr. Cronin also gave reasons why he felt a variance was justified. There was discussion on the location of the building on the site and the proposed lighting. Brian LaFreniere, an engineer with Marathon Ashland Petroleum, spoke about the design of the canopy. Boardmember Shankar felt that there was no "real hardship" shown. He thought the applicant should "easily be able to meet the 30 -foot building setback." He also said there was a need for as much parking as possible and advocated the addition of two spaces. The board reviewed a letter from Dan Soler, the Ramsey County engineer. Chairperson Ledvina agreed with the applicant that it was difficult to maximize the use of this site. He expressed some disappointment that more architectural features, such as those used by SuperAmerica on their Century Avenue store, were not incorporated into this building. Boardmember Johnson also agreed with the applicant and thought one curb -cut on White Bear Avenue was desirable. Boardmember LaCasse felt the building location was important and also that the single curb -cut on White Bear was " a plus." Boardmember LaCasse moved the Community Design Review Board: A. Allow the 15 -foot building setback variance for SuperAmerica's proposed convenience store at 1750 White Bear Avenue based on the applicant's indication of their operation and the strong desire to have the building centered on the canopy. C. Approve a parking- reduction authorization to allow 11 parking spaces (five fewer than the code requires) but recommend that the applicant restudy the front area to see if one or Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes of 06 -27 -2000 two more parking spaces can be safely added. The city is approving this request because: 1. Most of the customers that would be in the store at a given time are fuel customers who would leave their cars at the pump islands. 2. A reduction in the parking requirements is justified to create more efficient traffic flow within the site. This approval is conditioned on the applicant revising the site plan to add parking spaces in front of the building. The revised site plan shall be submitted to staff for approval. D. Approve the plans date - stamped July 5, 2000, for the redevelopment of the SuperAmerica fuel station and convenience store at 1750 White Bear Avenue. The owner shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit: a. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. b. Plans for the design and placement of the trash enclosure. The trash enclosure shall be large enough for refuse containers and any recycling containers the applicant may use. The trash enclosure shall have gates that are 100 percent opaque and extend to the ground. c. A revised site plan showing: 1) A 15 -foot building setback from the North St. Paul Road right -of -way. 2) As many parking spaces in the front of the building as can safely be put there. This revised plan shall be reviewed by staff. 3) One driveway access on White Bear Avenue instead of two. This single driveway shall be 36 feet wide to accommodate an entrance lane, aleft -turn exit lane and aright -turn exit. These lanes shall be marked with painted arrows on the pavement depicting the turning movement. The landscaping and fence plan shall be revised accordingly. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. b. Install reflectorized stop signs at all exits and a handicap - parking sign for the handicap - parking space. c. Install and maintain an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas. d. Screen the roof -top mechanical equipment as proposed. Community Design Review Board -3- Minutes of 06 -27 -2000 e. The site lights shall not exceed the maximum light intensity required by code. The lights beneath the canopy shall be flush mount. The lenses must not drop below the bottom of the canopy. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Boardmember Johnson seconded. Ayes Ledvina, LaCasse, Johnson Nay Shankar The motion passed. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA THURSDAY, JULY 6 2000 V. NEW BUSINESS B. SuperAmerica (1750 White Bear Avenue): Conditional Use Permit and Parking Reduction Authorization Ken Roberts, associate planner, gave the commissioners revised plans that were received from SuperAmerica on Wednesday, July 5, 2000. He noted that the driveway layout on White Bear Avenue was changed from two openings to One and the parking in front of the building was rearranged. Mr. Roberts then summarized the staff report. He said the community design review board disagreed with the staff and recommended approval of the 15 -foot setback variance. Chairperson Fischer invited the members of the planning commission to make a separate motion on this variance if they agreed or disagreed with the staff report and the review board recommendation. Mr. Roberts mentioned that Commissioner Ledvina (who was not in attendance at this meeting) called to speak about his concern in regard to outdoor storage. Mr. Roberts thought there might be a way to limit storage outdoors but said it was very difficult to prohibit it. Michael Cronin was present representing SuperAmerica. Gary Gerlach, the district manager and manager of the this store, also was present. Mr. Cronin said they would like to reserve the right to have some outdoor cabinets for storage. Products would not be displayed or sold outside. Mr. Cronin then. addressed the contamination that was found during an underground tank replacement project in 1993. Eleven monitoring wells were installed, nine on -site and two off -site, to monitor this pollution. The result has been that the pollution is not moving, has not gone away, and is not off the site. He said that the reconstruction and moving the tanks to the other end of the site would allow SuperAmerica to then treat or remove the contaminated soil. Mr. Cronin said the main reason for the 15 -foot building setback variance request is to try to improve the internal vehicle circulation on the site and maintain "some kind of relationship between the store, where the cashier's are, and the canopy." Commissioner Trippler suggested contacting the two residents that have the monitoring wells on their property to let them know that whatever transpires with their wells is not contingent on this construction happening or not happening. Commissioner Thompson asked if Maplewood was unrealistic in their parking requirements because of the number of parking reduction requests. Mr. Cronin that 1:200 is a fairly tight ratio because typical ratios are 1:250 or 1:300. He said that most of SuperAmerica's customers use the pump islands as parking. Various cities recognize the parking at the pumps as part of the parking requirement. Mr. Cronin's impression was that Maplewood required more parking per site than most surrounding communities and did not count parking at the pumps in their parking requirement. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend: B. - Adopt the resolution which approves a conditional use permit to rebuild and enlarge a motor fuel station at 1750 White Bear Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 07 -06 -2000 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding fuel tanks, fuel spillage, monitoring wells, any contaminated soil, etc. C. Approve a parking- reduction waiver to allow 11 parking spaces (five fewer than the code requires). The city is approving this request because: 1.. Most of the customers that would be in the store at a given time are fuel customers who would leave their cars at the pump islands. 2. A reduction in the parking requirements is justified to create more efficient traffic flow within the site. Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Ayes --all The motion passed. AGENDA ITEM 1 -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: Acting City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Lift Station 9, Project 99-02—Award of Bid DATE: July 21, 2000 Lift Station 9 is located on Larpenteur Avenue, east of Rice Street. The project would eliminate Lift Station 9 by extending the gravity sanitary sewer system into St. Paul and connecting to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' interceptor. This would substantially increase the reliability of our sanitary sewer system. Funding for the project comes from the sanitary sewer fund. Four bid were received from contractors for the project. The low bid was submitted by Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $558,783. This compares favorably with the engineer's estimate of $566,744.75. It is recommended the city council award the bid for Project 99 -02 to Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $558,783.00, and further authorize the finance director to adjust the project budget based on the bid amount. KGH jC Attachments Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS July 19, 2000 File: 805750) -0060 The Honorable .Mayor and City Council City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood MN 55109 RE: GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER FOR LIFT STATION NO. 9, CITY PROJECT 99 -02 CITY.OF MAPLEWOOD Dear Council Members: We have tabulated the bids received Wednesday, July 19, 2000 for the Gravity Sanitary Sewer for Lift Station No. 9 project. There were a total.of four bidders. The project was bid using a base bid with no bid alternatives. The base bid included- the construction of over 2500 linear feet of gravity sanitary sewer, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services metering vault, and demolition of the City's Lift Station No. 9. The following list summarizes the bids received: Base Bid 1. Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. $ 558,783.00 2. Minger Construction, Inc. $ 579,004.15 3. Lametti & Sons, Inc. $ 672,018.50 4. S.R. Weidema Contractors, Inc. $ 668,802.81 The total estimated construction cost for this project was $ 566,744.75. The low bid submitted by Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. of $ 558,783.00 for these improvements is 1.4% lower than the engineer's estimate. We have worked with Barbarossa & Sons, Inc on several major projects in Elk River all of which were successfully completed. We have found their work to have met all specifications and to be of good quality. We recommend award of the Gravity Sanitary Sewer for Lift Station No. 9 project to Barbarossa & Sons, Inc., as the lowest responsible bidder. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please feel free to contact me at 651- 644 -4389. Sincerely, Howard R. Green Company Jay C. rzyn, P. E. 0APROJ180742ULTR- 072000 -Bid Acceptance.doc 1326 Energy Park Drive . St. Paul, MN 55108 9 651/644-4389 fax 651/644-9446 toll free 888/368 -4389 TABULATION OF BIDS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the officials designated for a bid opening by the City Council of Maplewood was convened at 10 a.m., Wednesday, July 19, 2000. The purpose of this meeting was to receive, open and publicly read aloud bids for construction of Gravity Sanitary Sewer for Lift Station 9, Project 99 -02. Present were: Consultants from Howard R. Green Company and Bill Priefer Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids, the following bids were opened and read: Bidder Amount Bid Bond Affidavit EEO ADA Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. $558,783.00 5% X X X Minger Const. 579,004.15 5% X X X Lametti & Cons 653 5% X X X S. R. Weidema, Inc. 668,802.81 5% X X X Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the city clerk referred the bids received to the city engineer instructing him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation at the regular city council meeting of July 24, 2000. Meeting adjourned at 10:10 a.m. RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $558,783 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of City Project 99 -02, Gravity Sanitary Sewer for Lift Station 9 and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. AGENDA nUd NO / now* MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT Highpoint Ridge LOCATION: South of County Road D, west of Highway 61 DATE: July 17, 2000 INTRODUCTION Project Description Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified Rejected Mr. Frank Frattalone, representing Frattalone Excavating, is proposing to develop a residentialplannedunitdevelopment (PUD) called Highpoint Ridge. It would be on a 45 -acre site on the south side of County Road D, west of Highway 61. (Please see the maps starting on page 20.) Requests To build this project, Mr. Frattalone is requesting several city approvals including: 1. Changes to the comprehensive plan. These would be from R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) for the site. (See the existing and proposed land use maps on pages 21 and 22.) The developer also is proposing that the city drop the planned minor collector street that would go through the site from County Road D on the north to Highway 61 on the east. 2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) fora 222 -unit housing development. The applicant is requesting the CUP because the existing F (farmresidence), R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning districts limit the uses to single dwellings in a typical or standard subdivision or to commercial uses near Highway 61 in the M -1 zone. (See the propertyline /zoning map on page 23.) As proposed, this project would have 28 single dwellings, 72 town houses and 122 units of apartments. Having a PUD gives the city and developer a chance to be more flexible with site design and development details than the standard zoning requirements would normally allow. The existing F and M -1 zoning districts on the site also do not allow twin homes, town houses or other multiple dwellings. 3. A preliminary plat to create the lots in the development. (See the enclosed maps on pages24through27andtheenclosed ,project plans.) 4. Hang no parking for one side of private streets and driveways. BACKGROUND On July 10, 2000, the city council held a public hearing about this proposal. The council took testimony from the neighbors and the developer about the merits of the project at this hearing.gAfterlisteningtothetestimony, the council tabled action on the developer's requests to allow more time to study the project and the issues, including a traffic study submitted by the developer. Carev Addition On July 13, 1998, the city council made several approvals for the Carey Addition. These included a land use plan change and a zoning map change from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1S (single dwellings - small lot) for the north one -half of the plat and approval of the revised preliminary plat. This proposal was for the property along Carey Heights Drive, south of County Road D. The plat approval was subject to nine conditions. Mining Permit June 14, 1999: The City Council approved a revision to the mining operation conditional use permit to allow the operation to continue until December 1, 2001. DISCUSSION Land Use Plan Changes To build the proposed plat, Mr. Frattalone wants the city to change the land use plan for the site. These changes would be from R -1 (single dwelling residential), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(N!) (residential medium density) for the site. (See the existing and proposed land use maps on pages 21 and 22.) The city intends R -3(M) areas for a variety of housing including single dwellings, town houses or apartments of up to six units per gross acre. For R -1 areas, the city intends to have primarily single dwellings on 10,000 square -foot lots with a density of up to 4.1 units per gross acre. The city intends R -1(S) areas for small -lot (7,500 square -foot) single dwellings. For M -1 areas, the city plans for offices, clinics, day care centers, retail businesses, warehousing and light manufacturing operations.. The developer also is proposing that the city drop the planned minor collector street that would go through the site to connect County Road D on the north with Highway 61 on the east. Land use plan changes do not require specific findings for approval. Any change, however, should be consistent with the city's land use goals and policies. There are several goals in the Comprehensive Plan that apply to this request. Specifically, the land use plan has eleven general land use goals. Of these, three apply to this proposal including: Provide for orderly development. Minimize conflicts between land uses. Provide a wide variety of housing types. The land use plan also has several general development and residential development policies that relate to this project. They include: Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic, social or physical impact on adjoining developments. Whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar uses front on the same street or at borders of areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers. 2 The city supports the improvement, replacement or redevelopment of substandard or incompatible development. The city coordinates land use changes with the character of each neighborhood. Include a variety of housing types for all residents ... including apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single - family housing, public- assisted housing, low- and moderate- income housing, and rental and owner - occupied housing. Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. The housing plan also has policies about housing diversity and quality that the city should consider with this development. They are: Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the city. These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs and nontraditional households. The city will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and price ranges through its land use plan. This is a good site for a mix of housing styles and densities. It is on a major arterial street Highway 61) and close to a minor collector street (Walter Street/Beam Avenue). The project should be a good neighbor to the nearby homes. There would be single dwellings near most of the existing single dwellings and the proposed town houses would be a transitional land use between single dwellings and the proposed apartments near Highway 61. The city's long -term stability of its tax base depends upon its ability to attract and keep residents of all ages. To do so, the city must insure that a diverse mix of housing styles is available in each stage of the life cycle of housing needs. One advantage of this proposal is that an area that the city once thought would be good for commercial or light industrial development would become residential. This should be beneficial to the existing nearby residential properties. Having single dwellings near the existing residences should be better neighbors than the mining operation, the commercial or a manufacturing use that the existing land use and zoning designations would allow. The proposed apartment site also would not be a great site for a commercial or retail business. It is too far away from and hidden from the main drive lanes of the highway to make it desirable for a commercial or retail business. In fact, there is an area of large trees between the frontage road and the highway that screen the apartment site from the highway. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), however, is concerned that traffic noise in the area could exceed established noise standards for residential uses. (Please see the letter from Paul Czech of MnDOT on pages 33 and 34.) In response to neighbor concerns, the developer's engineer changed the PUD by dropping theppg proposed Lydia Avenue connection between the proposed townhouses and the proposed single dwellings along Duluth Street. (See the site plan and preliminary plat date - stamped June 30, 2000, on pages 24 and 25.) This new design means there would not be a street connection through this development between Highway 61 and the proposed and existing single dwellings. In fact, the proposed townhouses and apartments will only have street access to the proposed Lydia Avenue and the existing frontage road. As proposed, the 222 units on the 45 -acre site means there would be an average of 5.0 units per gross acre. The proposed overall development density would be consistent with Maplewood's medium density standards and with the density standards recommended by the Metropolitan 3 Council for housing in first -ring suburbs. That is, they want to see residential development with at least three units per gross acre. Collector Street As I noted earlier, the developer is proposing that the city drop a planned minor collector street from the land use plan. This street would have connected County Road D with Highway 61. After reviewing the area, the developer determined that this street would not have worked well with the site topography, the powerlines and pipelines near the center of the site nor with the existing and proposed street pattern. The existing land use plan shoves Highway 67 as a major arterial street and Walter Street/Beam Avenue as a collector street. These streets are designed and built to carry larger volumes of traffic than the local or neighborhood streets. The proposed PUD has Lydia Avenue intersecting with Highway 61 at the southeast corner of the site. (See the proposed intersection detail on page 30.) This street layout would direct all the traffic from the townhouses and apartments in this development onto the frontage road and highway (an arterial street) and not onto the local or neighborhood streets. Conditional Use Permit The applicant has applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development PUD) for the 222 -unit housing development. They are requesting the CUP because the existin g F farm residential) and M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning designations limit the land uses to single dwellings and commercial (near the highway). As proposed, there would be a mix of single - family homes, town houses and apartments in the PUD. The developer intends to sell all the lots for the single dwellings and town houses while the apartments would be for rent. As proposed, the 222 dwelling units would be on about 44.5 acres for an overall project density of 5.0 units per acre. For a comparison, the comprehensive plan allows developments with single dwellings to have up to 4.1 units per gross acre. As such, on a 44.5 acre site, there could be up to 178 single - family homes. Preliminary Plat Density and Lot Size As proposed, the single - family lots range from 15,000 square feet to 42,481 square feet with an average lot size of about 21,200 square feet. The city requires each lot in the R -1 (single dwelling) zoning district to have at least 75 feet of frontage and have at least 10,000 square feet. All of the proposed single dwelling lots would meet or exceed the city's R -1 zoning standards. Block 3 on the north part of the site would have 36 town houses on about 12.8 acres (2.8 units per acre). These units would be on their own 28- foot -wide private cul -de -sac that would provide vehicle access to and from County Road D for these town houses. Public Utilities There are sanitary sewer and water in Carey Heights Drive, Duluth Street and County Road D to serve the proposed development. The developer will extend the water main from the north end of Carey Heights Drive and Duluth Street and from near Walter Street along the south side of County Road D into and through the site. The Saint Paul Water Utility will need to approve the water plan. 4 Trees As proposed, the contractor for Mr. Frattalone would grade almost the entire site to create the street right -of -ways, the proposed ponds and the house pads. This grading would remove about 121 large trees on the 45 -acre site. (See the tree inventory plan on page 28.) Maplewood's tree ordinance requires the developer to replace each large tree that the contractor would remove with two new trees. As such, the developer will need to plant at least 242 trees within the project site to replace the removed trees. The developer has prepared a plan for the tree planting (see the proposed plan on page 29.) There are several problems with the proposed plan,, however. Tree planting in the front yards of the single - dwellings is difficult, if not impossible, to coordinate with the home construction. If the contractor puts the trees in before the homes, then they often end up in the way of the driveway or the utilities. Putting the tree in after the contractor has finished the house requires much coordination with the homeowner and their landscaping. As an alternative, staff recommends that the developer revise the proposed tree planting plan to bunch the new trees together in groups. These planting areas should be around the ponding areas and along the common property lines between residences. There also could be trees along all of the proposed trails, not just along the trail between Block One and Block Three. In addition, the revised plan must show the developer planting at least 242 trees after the site grading is done. Trails The developer's plans show three walking paths in the development. These include a path along the north side of the lots on Carey Heights Drive (under the power lines), between Lots 4 and 5, Block One (connecting Carey Heights Drive and the trail under the power lines) and a path from the north cul -de -sac (Block 3) to the west toward the city park. (These are shown on the site plan on page 25.) To prevent any confusion about ownership and property rights for trails, the county recommends that the city have the developer locate the trail in a right -of -way on the plat. The west end .of the proposed trail in Block 3 however, needs to be changed or moved. As proposed, it would run into the rear part of the privately -owned property to the west of the project site. This trail should connect to the proposed east/west trail that would be under the power lines by moving the west end of the trail or by moving the trail to the east between Lots 8 and 9. For paved off - street paths, Maplewood requires 8- foot -wide bituminous paths centered in a right - of -way that is at least 10 feet wider than the trail. As such, the trailway for the trail between Lots 4 and 5, Block 1 and in Block 3 need to be at least 18 feet wide to meet this code requirement. The developer should build a two -rail split rail fence on both sides of each paved trail within this plat. The city should require the developer to install the trails and fences with the street and before final plat approval. This is to ensure that the lot buyers know that the trail is there. Drainage - Watershed District Most of the site drains to the south and east toward Highway 61 and to the pond behind LaMettry's Body Shop. A concern of several neighbors with this proposal is storm water drainage. The developer's engineer told me that by using the proposed and existing ponds as storm water detention facilities, the development will not increase the rate of storm water runoff from the site. That is, the runoff leaving the site will be at or below current levels. The Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District has been working with the developer on the proposed project plans. Mr. Frattalone or the contractor must. get a permit from the watershed district before starting grading or construction. 5 Dedications Dan Solar, the Ramsey County traffic engineer, said that the applicant should dedicate ten additional feet of right -of -way along County Road D' This is because the Ramsey County right -of- way plan requires a total right -of -way width of 86 feet (43 feet on side) for County Road D. On- Street Parking Standards The applicant is proposing street widths from 28 feet to 32 feet in the development. I had the Fire Chief and Fire Marshal review the proposed streets and their widths. According to Article 9, Section 902 of the Uniform Fire Code, all fire access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet. As such, the 28- foot -wide streets may have parking on one side of the street and the 32- foot -wide streets may have parking on either side of the street. Traffic Study The developer had Benshoof and Associates do a tragic study of the area. This study was to address the effects the proposed development would have on traffic volumes on existing roads near the site. (Please see the study starting on page 35.) The study reviewed existing traffic conditions in the area, the amount of traffic that the proposal would create, where that traffic would go and the resultant traffic volumes. The study concluded that the proposed development would not cause negative impacts on nearby residential streets. The traffic consultant also concluded that the proposed development would not cause any significant impact to traffic flow on Highway 61. (See the letter on page 41.) COMMISSION ACTION On June 19, 2000, the planning commission held a public hearing about this proposal. The commission recommended that the M -1 (light manufacturing) area near the frontage road remain and that the city approve the rest of the proposed PUD west of the existing M -1 area. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approve the resolution on page 42. This resolution changes the land use plan for the Highpoint Ridge residential development, south of County Road D, west of Highway 61. These changes are from R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) for the site. This resolution also drops the planned minor collector street between County Road D and Highway 61. The city is making these changes because: 1. The development would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. 2. The town house and apartment sites in the development are proper for and consistent with the city's policies for medium and high- density residential uses. These include: a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing and proposed low density residential and commercial land uses. b. It is on an arterial street and is near a collector street. A 3. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. The proposed single dwellings will separate the proposed town houses and apartments from existing homes. b. There should be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing local residential streets. The proposed street pattern keeps the town house and apartment traffic separate from the proposed and existing single dwellings. 4. Neither the city or the developer plan to build the proposed collector street between County Road D and Highway 61 because of the existing and proposed grades, the existing power lines and the existing pipelines makes it difficult to build a street in this area. B. Approve the resolution starting on page 36. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the Highpoint Ridge housing development. The city bases this approval on the findings required by code. (Refer to the resolution for the specific findings.) Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan and preliminary plat date - stamped June 30, 2000, except where the city requires changes. The developer shall revise the grading, utility. tree planting and other project and construction plans to follow the site plan and preliminary plat dated June 30, 2000. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one Year. 3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, trails, tree and driveway and parking lot plans. 4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall give the city an easement for this pond and shall be responsible for getting any needed off -site pond and drainage easements. 5. The developer or contractor shall: a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Remove the debris, junk, garbage and travel trailers from the site. 6. This approval does not include the final design approval for the duplexes, townhomes or for the apartment buildings. The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping and site plans for these to the community design review board (CDRB) for approval by the CDRB. 7. The city shall not issue any building permits for construction on an outlot (per city code requirements). The developer must record a final plat to create buildable lots for any outlot in the preliminary plat before the city will issue a building permit. M 8. The city council shall review this permit in one year. C. Approve the Mighpoint Ridge preliminary plat (received by the city on June 30, 2000). The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat: 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements, b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Have NSP install Group V rate street lights in at least nine locations - primarily at street intersections and street curves. The exact style and location shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. d. Pay the city for the cost of traffic- control, street identification and no parking signs. e. Provide all required and necessary easements. f. Demolish or remove the existing house and garage at 1170 County Road D, and all other buildings, scrap metal, debris and junk from the site. g. Cap and seal all wells on site that the owners are not using; remove septic systems or drainfields, subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines. Within one year of the contractor installing the sanitary sewer, the owners of the existing houses on Carey Heights Drive shall connect their houses to the sanitary sewer. h. Complete all the curb and gutter on Duluth Street and on Carey Heights Drive on the south side of the site. This is to replace the temporary cul -de -sac, repair the cul -de- sac pavement and restore and sod the boulevards. i. For the trails, complete the following: 1) Construct an eight- foot -wide paved walkway and two -rail split -rail fencing between Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, between the street and the proposed east/west trail in Block 3, and along the north side of the lots in Block One (in the easement area) as shown the plat date - stamped June 30, 2000. The developer shall extend the west end of the trail in Lot 3, Block One into the city park to connect to the existing park trail. All trails between lots shall be in a 13- foot -wide traitway or pedestrian way or in easement areas. 2) The developer shall install atwo -rail split -rail fence on both sides of each trail and posts at the end of the trails to prevent motorized vehicles from using the trail. 3) The developer shall build the trails and fencing with the streets. 4) The city engineer must approve these plans. j. Install signs where the driveways for the twin homes and for the town houses intersect the public streets indicating that they are private driveways. u 2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall be revised to follow the site plan and preliminary plat dated June 30, 2000, and shall include the grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail, sidewalk and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall show: The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. 2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. 3) House pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large trees. 4) The proposed street and trail grades as allowed by the city engineer. 5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. On slopes steeper than 3:1, the developer shall prepare and implement a stabilization and planting plan. At a minimum, the slopes shall be protected with wood fiber blanket, be seeded with a no maintenance vegetation and be stabilized before the city approves the final plat. 6) All retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a building permit from the city. 7) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city engineer. 8) No grading beyond the plat boundary without temporary grading easements from the affected property owner(s). 9) A minimum of a 10- foot -wide, 10:1 bench below the normal water elevation NWL) of any pond designed to be a wet pond. The depth of the pond below the NWL shall not exceed four feet. C.* The tree plan shall: 1) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or final plat approval. 2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site. 3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous trees shall be at least two and one half (2'/2) inches in diameter and shall be a mix of red and white oaks, ash, lindens and sugar maples. The coniferous trees shall be at least eight (8) feet tall and shall be a mix of Austrian pine and other species. D 4) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. 5) Include for city staff a detailed planting plan and material list. 6) Be revised to group the new trees together. These planting areas shall be around the ponding areas, on the steep slopes, along the common property lines between residences and along all of the proposed trails. The developer may use the tree groupings to separate the different types of residences. 7) Show the planting of of least 242 trees after the site grading is done. d. The street, trail and utility plans shall show: 1) Paved walkways and two -rail split -rail fences in a trailway or pedestrian way as shown on the proposed plans. This shall include the trail between Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, in Block 3 (as revised), between Block 1 and Block 3 (under the power lines), connecting to the existing park trail to the west of the site and on the east side of English Lane (Ridge Lane) to connect to the proposed apartment site. The parks and recreation director shall approve their locations and design. 2) The public streets shall be a 9 -ton design with a maximum street grade of eight percent and the maximum street grade within 75 feet of all intersections at two percent. 3) All the streets, parking areas and driveways with continuous concrete curb and gutter. 4) All public street right -of -ways shall be at least 60- feet -wide. 5) The completion of the curb and gutter on the north end of Duluth Street and the existing Carey Heights Drive cul -de -sac, the repair or replacement of the cul -de -sac pavement and the restoration and sodding of the boulevards around the cul -de -sac. 6) A connection between the proposed water main in Block 3 and the proposed water main system on the southerly part of the plat. The developer also shall make a connection between the proposed water main on Lydia Avenue at Highway 61 and the existing water main on the west side of Highway 61, south of Guldens. 7) The coordination of the water main alignments and sizing with the standards and requirements of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS). Available fire flow analysis shall be determined for the water system at the proposed apartment complex as well as through the existing 8 -inch and 12- inch crossings of Highway 61 at Beam Avenue. Fire flow requirements shall be verified with the Maplewood Fire Department. 8) All utility excavations located within the proposed right -of -ways or within easements. The developer shall acquire easements for all utilities that would be outside the project area. 10 g) A reduced number of sanitary and storm sewer manholes and water main bends by "cutting corners" with the utility alignments. The developer's engineer shall verify with the SPRWS the acceptable water main alignments and crossings. Manholes may be offset from the street centerline if the result lessens the number of structures. 10) Provisions for public utilities and service(s) to the vacant or undeveloped properties on the south side of the proposed Lydia Avenue. e. The drainage plan shall erasure that there is no increase in the rate of storm water run -off leaving the site above the current (predevelopment) levels. 3. Change the plat as follows: a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. c. Revise the lot lines in Block One and Block Three so there is a 18- foot -wide trail or pedestrian way between Lots 4 and 5, Block One and between Lots 6 and 7 or between Lots 8 and 9, Block Three to accommodate the proposed trails. d. Show the existing pipeline and the NSP and pipeline easements on the final plat. e. Show all public street right -of -ways at 60 feet wide. f. Make as many of the property lines as is reasonably possible radial to the cul -de- sacs or perpendicular to the street right -of- ways. g. If necessary, increase the lot widths for the lots next to the pipeline to ensure that the house pads will be at least 100 feet away from the pipeline. (code requirement) h. Change the street names as follows: 1) Carey Heights Drive shall be used only in Block 2 (Phase One) of the project. The north /south street between Outlot A and Outlot B shall be Duluth Street. 2) Highpoint Court shall be called Ridge Place. 3) English Lane shall be called Ridge Lane. 4) The cul -de -sac in Block 3 shall be called Highridge Court. i. Show the extra ten -feet of street right-of-way for County Road D. 4. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including: a. Any off -site drainage and utility easements. b. Any necessary easements for the dedication and construction of Lydia Avenue. 11 5. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. 6. Record the following with the final plat: a. All homeowners association documents. b. A deed restriction prohibiting the construction of a dwelling or its attachments within 100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline. This affects Lots 3 through 6, Block 1 and Lots 7 through 18, Block 3 of the proposed preliminary plat the city received on June 30, 2000. The developer also shall notify the purchasers of the pipeline location. c. A deed dedicating 10 feet of additional right -of -way, along County Road D for future street widening with the final plat. The applicant shall submit the language for this dedication to the city for approval before recording. d. A covenant or deed restriction with the final plat that prohibits the driveways on Lots 1, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 36, Block 3 from going onto County Road D. e. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision or splitting of the lots or parcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless approved by the city council. The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the city for approval before recording. 7. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading. 8. The owners of the properties at 1174 and 1176 County Road D shall change the addresses of their properties to Carey Heights Drive addresses within 30 days of the contractor installing the base bituminous course for the new public street in front of their homes. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. D. Adopt the resolution on page 39. This resolution is for the on- street parking standards and no on- street parking requirements for the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D and west of Highway 61. 12 CITIZENS' COMMENTS surveyed the owners of the 70 properties within 350 feet of this site and received 15 written replies. Of those who replied, 14 were against the project (primarily the apartments) and one was for the proposed plan. (Note: These comments were in response to the developers first proposal. The developer changed the proposed preliminary plat and site plan by dropping the Lydia Avenue street connection through the site after the planning commission meeting. This change was in response to neighbors concerns.) 1. We are very much opposed to the apartment complex - It is currently zoned commercial and the expectation of people who bought into this neighborhood is that it would remain commercial property. It would be unfair to add (potentially) 244+ people and cars to Duluth Street to access an apartment building. We bought into asingle- dwelling neighborhood - thetraffic would be brutal to the current residents. It is also not fair to place apartments with 20 percent low income housing) in such close proximity to higher income dwellings, where people have paid to be here. (Bradt - 1236 Summit Court) 2. 1 am strongly opposed to the development plan including apartments. Single family homes and moderately priced town homes OK. I think the future home owners of this new development would not appreciate apartment buildings next to their property as do I. This will reduce property values, increase traffic in areas which will not be able to handle the abundance of cars.. There Is also no way for this traffic to go north from this plan, except to use Duluth, my road to Summit. I do not wish to have my property and street used as a turn around - this is very dangerous for. kids!! I also foresee longer bus rides for our kids. This is a single home area - lets keep it that way and not degrade the neighborhood. (Johnson - 1216 Summit Ct.) 3. We like these plans with the exception of the 122 -unit apartment complex! This will depreciate the value of the homes in the neighborhood. This neighborhood is not low to moderate income housing! The apartment complex will produce heavy traffic on Duluth Street - this poses a serious safety hazard for the many small children who play in the neighborhood! The people who now live in this neighborhood payed top dollar for their lots and homes. We also pay high taxes! To mix an apartment complex with $350,000+ homes makes no sense. The 122 units will create 200+ additional cars driving up and down Duluth Street on a daily basis! (Jurgens - 1225 Summit Court) 4. We strongly oppose the 122 -unit apartment complex and twin -home in the new proposal. We want an alternative solution for connecting Duluth Street to the new Lydia Avenue. Looking at the proposed layout, the new residences would have to go to Highway 61 north via Beam Avenue. There are small children waiting for school buses on Duluth Street. We do not want any unsafe conditions to the children because of this heavy traffic. It would be better for the new residences to exit directly to Highway 61 north and south by using the unconnected Lydia Avenue or using County Road D. (Nguyen - 1226 Summit Court) 5. 1 am very concerned with having apartment buildings in this immediate area because crime usually comes with them. Our homes are prime targets especially since they are more costly than many nearby. I do not favor apartments built here by Frattalone. (Osell - 2970 Duluth St.) 6. The connection between Carey Heights and Duluth makes good sense - be sure to allow path easement through 1 or 2 yards on cul -de -sac to connect to park path under power 13 lines. The duplexes /town houses also are priced accordingly to neighborhood and would be a good fit with County Road D housing. No access through our neighborhood. The apartment complex is not a good fit. Typically apartment dwellers have 2 cars per unit. That is 244 cars extra on Duluth /Carey Heights loop depending on drivers destination south to connect to light and go north or out back entrance to head west on County Road D). Also renters usually do not have the stability of homeowners or town house owners. Many negative statistics are relative to apartment complexes. We already have a large saturation of apartments on County Road D (in Vadnais Heights) to meet the quota of balance between housing of single and multiple ratios. Please do not add anymore apartment complexes. (Esch - 2993 Carey Heights Drive) 7. We object to Carey Heights Drive connecting to this new development. We already have two openings to this development. Carey Heights Drive is an independent street and we do not want it connected to High Point Ridge. (DeYoungs - 2964 Carey Heights Drive) 8. We feel the larger "horse shoe" of single family homes is a welcome, positive and well planned addition to our neighborhood. Even the town homes by Masterpiece are well done. The one objection we have would be the apartments - since there already are so many on the north side of County Road D. (Schroeder - 3007 Frank Street) 9. As far as the city of Maplewood should be concerned, the welfare of its residents should come before personal interest of private enterprises. The city should demand that the original plan of building single family homes must be maintained to assure that the value and appearance of the neighborhood is maintained. When we built our homes in the 1990's, developers like Frattalone and Mogrens assured us that this area will have single family homes in the 2,000 square -foot- plus range. Since then, we have already witnessed that both parties did not keep their promise and allowed smaller homes to be built. The only line of defense for the residents is the Mayor and the city council. We are now relying on you to assure apartment buildings are not built in this area. The informational meeting already 'Indicated to us that they plan to rent apartments to low and moderate income people. This is an invitation to increase crime in our area. The city council must reject this proposal in the best interests of its residents. (Pohlkamp - 2990 Edward Street) 10. Keep the bottom -right "leg" of the project zoned commercial since commercial use already in place north and south of it. A large apartment complex would double the traffic in the neighborhood (Kohiman Lake Overlook) since 120+ units about the same as the number of homes in place right now. Traffic use design not set to handle this amount. A more logical place for apartment expansion in the area is along County Road D between White Bear Avenue and Beam Avenue. There are several spots open along 1 -694 in this area. To me the apartment complex does not fit into the planning "flow." Down the hill right now it goes single- family homes down to businesses next to Highway 61. One could put in a row of town homes to soften the transition. We already have several apartments in the immediate area on County Road D, west of Highway 61, off 1 -694. Do not see the need for another at this location. Use wildflower mix for seeding non - mowable slopes on the grading plan. (Put a) Small tot park down by the pond in the Outlot B area. Does not seem unreasonable to make this modification since every inch right now is being carved out for residential sale. Why not make a small concession to meet the needs of the new neighbors? Policy of replacing removed trees. Obviously most, if not all, trees will be taken out by major grading effort. Be nice if new trees could be chosen from native varieties - more oak and less green ash. .1 like the cul -de -sac for the 36 unit townhome complex - nice design! Since the turn around 14 is already in place at the end of Carey Heights Drive now, keep this expanded out and put in a center boulevard of trees to slow traffic coming down. Nice to do at the end of Duluth Street too. (Huntley - 3020 Edward- St.) 11. 1 am opposed to the 122 multi- housing medium - density (apartments). I don't think it would be a good location. Too many occupants and the danger of overbuilding. Also opposed to the light manufacturing in a residential area. The noise factor was not addressed adequately. Please look more closely at natural sound barriers. Also opposed to additional town houses in Outlot D (Z4 units). Do you do any environmental impact studies? This whole development seems to be an overload on the land involved. I am also concerned about the road access during construction. We live at 1176 County Road D and the entire road access will be affected. (Owner - 1176 County Road D) 12. We are strongly opposed to any type of apartment complex in this development. Secondly, we are concerned about the increase in traffic which maybe a result of such high density housing. We would sympathize with the thought and feelings of our neighbors who are directly affected by this proposal (those on Summit Court - on the north side and the homes directly at the end of Duluth Street). (Herold - 1247 Countryview Circle) 13. Looks like a well thought out plan and layout to me. (Rosell - Stillwater) Also see the letters an pages 31 and 32. also received several telephone calls from nearby residents. They expressed concerns about storm water drainage, the proposed housing mix (including the proposed town houses and apartments), possible assessments and increased traffic on Duluth Street. 15 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 45 acres Existing land use: A mining operation and accessory buildings from the former farm SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Houses and apartments across County Road D in Vadnais Heights South: Houses on Carey Heights Drive, Duluth Street, Summit Court and Gulden's West: Houses on Carey Heights Drive, Frank Street and Maplewood city park East: Highway 61 and frontage road PAST ACTIONS - Carey Heights Drive and Carey Addition 1. June 1964: The village council approved a preliminary plat for this area. 2. 8- 13 -64: A second preliminary plat was approved by the council. Council also approved a building permit for Mr. Carey at 1174 County Road D, subject to an agreement between himself and the village that he will not request any village maintenance on his private driveway, nor will he object to the construction of, and assessment for, a standard village street in the future. 3. 10- 21 -66: The city issued a building permit to Richard Barrett at 1176 E. County Road D. 4. 11 -9 -66: Richard! Barrett signed an agreement waiving his right to a village street or maintenance of the private drive to his property and agreed to construct and maintain a private drive to his property. 5. 11- 10 -66: The village engineer reported to the council that the private drive did not meet village street standards and was not constructed to approved plans. Council authorized a building permit to be issued to Mr. Barrett subject to Mr. Barrett complying with the conditions in the engineer's report. 6. 11- 17 -66: The planning commission recommended approval of a preliminary plat for Richard Barrett consisting of four lots on the west side of Carey Heights Drive and the half streets required by council action of 11- 10 -66. 7. 11- 17 -66: Council approved a preliminary plat for the Carey Addition. This plat comprised only part of the Carey property including right -of -way for Carey Heights Drive, Woodlynn Avenue and Lydia Avenue. 8. 4 -4 -77: The planning commission recommended that the council table consideration of variances requested by Mr. Novak (build on a substandard lot, without frontage to a dedicated public street) to allow the applicant an opportunity to pursue the matter of dedication of the right -of -way (Carey Heights Drive) and pursuing a variance to standards of street and utility construction. 9. 9 -1 -77: Mr. Carey petitioned the city to improve Carey Heights Drive from County Road D southward approximately 1,500 feet. 16 10. 9- 28 -77: Council ordered feasibility study for the improvement of Carey. Heights Drive with public street and utilities. The study showed that the project would be cost - prohibitive. 11. 1- 26 -78: Council approved a lot area variance but denied two street access variances as requested by Mr. Richard Novak, based on the following findings: 1. The street access variances do not meet the "spirit and intent" of the ordinance. 2. A precedent would be set for similar lots in other areas: of the city. 3. There may be times of the year when emergency services could not get access to the property. 4. There is no hardship that is "unique to the individual property under consideration." 12. On April 20, 1978, city staff recommended that the council declare the Carey Heights Drive improvement project not feasible and go no further with the project. Council tabled consideration to allow Mr. Carey "to contact his own source in regard to providing utilities on Carey Heights Drive. " 13. On December 18, 1980, the city council approved a lot split request of Aaron Rupert to create a 13,500 square -foot lot on the east side of the private Carey Heights Drive. Mr. Rupert, however, never created the lot as approved by the city council. 14. On October 26, 1987, the council initiated a public improvement project for the construction of Carey Heights Drive, between Kohlman Lake Overlook plat and County Road D. 15. On February 27, 1989, the council held a public hearing about building Carey Heights Drive from Kohlman Lake Overlook development to County Road D. At this hearing, the council decided that the project was advisable, expedient and necessary and ordered the city engineer to prepare the plans for the project. However, the affected property owners did not want to provide the necessary public street right -of -way to the city. As such, the city never built the project. 16. On May 27, 1997, the city council considered the Carey Addition preliminary plat. The council tabled action on the plat until June 9, 1997 so the applicant and city staff could research four items. These included the: 1. Location of the pipeline and the proposed lot layout. 2. Need for a variance for lots that would be less than 10,000 square feet in area. 3. Possibility of adding traffic calming features and signage with the plat. 4. Possibility of adding stop signs to intersection of Carey Heights Drive and Frank Street. 17. On June 9, 1997, the council again considered the proposed plat. The council tabled action on the plat until June 23 or July 14, 1997. Frattalone Mining Operation June 28, 1982: The City Council approved a conditional use permit and three variances to mine this site. The CUP was subject to nine conditions. 17 July 25, 1983: The Council renewed the permit for five years, subject to the original conditions. October 10, 1988, and October 20, 1989: The Council renewed the permit for one Y ear, subject totheoriginalconditions. October 22, 1990: The Council renewed the permit for three years, subject to the originalJ conditions. March 25, 1991: The Council denied a permit change to add a material crush in /rec clin operationtothissite. g Y g p on January 10, 1994: The Council revised the conditions of approval for the permit and renewed the mining approval for five more years. A condition of this approval was that the permit would end infiveyears (in January 1999). PLANNING Existing Land Use Plan designations: R -1 (single dwellings) and M -1 (light manufacturing)Existing Zoning: F (farm residence) and M -1 (light manufacturing) Proposed hand Use Plan designation: R -3(M) (residential medium density) Reasons for the Requests This proposal needs a land use plan change because: 1. State law does not allow a city to adopt any regulation that conflicts with its comprehensivepeplan. 2. One of the findings required by code for a CUP is that the use is in conformity ywiththecicomprehensiveplan. The land use plan shows this site for R -1 and M -1 uses, which do not include multiple-familyo. er is applying for _ p Yhousing. The developer a CUP because the zoning on this site is F (farm residence)and M -1 (light manufacturing). The F zoning allows farms and single dwellings and the M -1 zoningngallowsforavarietyofcommercialandlightmanufacturinglanduses. The developer chose to • • p applyforaCUP, rather than a zone change. A CUP for a PUD is only for a specific use and site Ian. A re dwellings) to R -1 (single dwellin and to R -3 (multiple p• • ngle dwellings and a varlet g) dwelling residential) would allow a varlet ofsingleofmultiple-dwelling use Y Y p g sand plans. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL There are no specific criteria for a land use plan change. Any land use lan change should bepg consistent with the goals and policies in the city's comprehensive plan. Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards.Refer to the findings in the resolution on pages 43 through 45. Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approveplans:g g pp 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship o neighboring,p g oring,existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirabilityy of iinvestmentoroccupationintheneighborhood; that t will not unreasonably nterfere withY the 18 use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character ofthesurroundingneighborhoodandisnotdetrimentaltotheharmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal p Ian. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of goodcomposition, materials, textures and colors. APPLICATION DATE The city received the complete project plans for this proposal on May 26, 2000. The city received arevisedpreliminaryplatandarevisedsiteplanforthedevelopmentonJune30, 2000. Sixty dayssYfromMay26isJuly25, 2000, and sixty days from June 30 is August 29 2000. These are bwhich g the dates y ch the city council must take action on the proposal unless the developer agrees to a timeextension. kr /p: /sec4 /highpont.mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Land Use Plan Map (Existing) 3. Land Use Plan Map (Proposed) 4. Property Line /Zoning Map 5. Proposed Preliminary Plat date - stamped June 30, 2000 6. Proposed Site Plan date - stamped June 30, 2000 7. Proposed Grading Plan 8. Proposed Utility Plan 9. Tree Inventory Plan 10. Proposed Tree Flan 11. Proposed Intersection Detail 12. 5 -21 -00 letter from Jorgenson (1235 Summit Court) 13. 5 -23 -00 letter from Lambert (2986 Duluth Street) 14. 6 -16 -00 letter from Czech (MnDOT) 15. 7 -7 -00 traffic study memo from Benshoof and Associates 16.. Land Use Plan Change Resolution (R -1, R -1(S) and M -1 to R -3(M)) 17. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Resolution 18. No Parking Resolution 19. Project Plans (separate attachments - including 11 x17s and full -size) 19 Attachment 1 VADNAIS HEIGHTS lky -- Q CO U J 9ErW AVE cf O I W - "vfYa i 1 Q z U corfor. W I nk.f, J PtAL CIR AL PAL -LECRESTM FOR Cf. P r J , Mario KoNnxm J +coHUMw eve. , couNmr ROAD c cr A DE110rtf AVE 4VE BROOKS CT.SEX TART z Abw MtT AVE. AVE. OERHNS AVE CERWyS pKwr t#tANDtiIIEW AVE Ali JVN(Nk'a DR. 9*R;Mti AVE od lala AVE yNCNiG pR, `K 5 UiRK r» AYE. LAW / • LAURIE Rfl. VdJRiE LELMJCuu cr. , g u vE. JUNCTION AVE a t' g $ CO. A ( 1) CFM1Mf8ERS ST (1 AVE E AVE OL"M fIDR 106E AVE rocolsE JBIUMW AVE LOCATION MAP 20 4 N Attachment 2 Vadnais County Rd. D R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS R -3(M) = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OS = OPEN SPACE M -1 = LIGHT MANUFACTURING minor collector l t F minor Beam Ave. f collector y O cc C U m J ty Rd. C C, 00 0 0 I Gervais LAND USE MAP PROJECT SITE (EXISTING) 21 interchange 4 N Attachment 3 Vadnaic Hpinhlc C m V m J County Rd. D interchange M -1 ,o 1 I minor i collector Beam Ave, TI77 11' r r g / ty Rd. C o d 0 0 0 R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS R -3(M) = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OS = OPEN SPACE M -1 = LIGHT MANUFACTURING Gervais LAND USE MAP PROPOSED) 22 4 N Attachment 4 VADNAIS HEIGHTS / , X COUNTY ROAD D - - • ..4 3.411 t: •1a 430 ¢` w,, •, • _ i..I co .: 3) TM .. — P.- # ' N C4 ' N 1320 . , Von _. i 1322 3110p ?? yto2) i +1 X30 PROJECT SITE `- A-. tz .a • 3090tiDS4eec `/ eb 1 1 . - _ . PIPELINES _ lK 11!59... -. 1 -- _ - 'I •-._ ,. - •_ i .i a - NSP POWER LINES 1 4° 743) 2(60 PARK _ r 2 :3, . , ?•, PROJECT M LEXUS .6 SITE y =' 3006 : rs. OG h ~ s,w., A . . q..` or ' :mow .w 3 1/ W 2997 2998 -- =— - --- - - - -- - — - - - - - -` 1NMtrw140os2999 -s cV a a r r c 2986 a 4., z 1 . 2 - 29882993 1215 _c45) 2994 A tea - _ t' ;,, ' ; * _ , s .,.,,9 SUMM, CT 2978' GULDENS vE,NB 2975 W g c a•oo IO1aj / 2976g 2 - o' co co s 2970 2999 2984, , c , - N N et _ _ 2969 ;4 2968 `` ' 2 2980 14 -- - 962 ;r _ , , noun s0) - s_ - s b y 13 L`'AY 9°1 12(2 i C4UI QTR 90 s3 Iv7 l si 8 Y VnIto•go C' I R C bZ14: FUTURE AUTO USE , S .Z• 8 .Z (141 9 /1 +J I!71 ^y A (3 7 'K r tH 1 W 9 (" N ,c• .,, ., a N 13 T(o 'I' L 1 1 13 a - f = fy (29 ;!26 ss o , ° ( zg - S No 'LaMETTRY COLLISIONitsG ' 17 c 1` /fIM cs.tJ '• ° 6 ' ,` ° °`• 1 ,( ° x'.6 (z 1 -- GOLF COURSE13QsO4OfI7nYP.io J . qo 3S f , z? ; _ 19 (33) , U' CT' MAP LEWOO D TOYOTAp )42 ,}t a : d (` t 4!' 160.02. 120 3 ' rqe ` BUILDING1.> ,o C9 m r;) ,'• (ZS Eo •' e: ' ` 20 2 o f 2 1 o Y s Ins I ( 49 - I.T-t .c 16 t; 3 ? .Z ie • i= ;: ..! 221.3.) ° 9 114% < o to 13 t 17 16 19 alp . . (So : 2889 141) 1L e (3 ° r v s • try $ 05 .1 Al- „1e 4.1 too • os - Go - 14 (SI) 115r 1 (' o • (1 1. A r1 i'° `__:. F E BEAM AVENUE 1 OO 1 312 / ' P •r• S:c a. . ac .ac Y% 3 94 a / a SS.e 1 51 Wv I 2 3 : e / , , : rs . FJ ST PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 23 4 N Attachment 5 PROPOS PHASE . .. . ............ :. . 11.1.1.1.". ".. I.M. COR. OF THE V. E. 1/4. OF THE N.E. 114. SEC 4. 23. F. 22 I.. -_ -. ___ _ ' _Ctt_IINTY QLHLIMI`:- ..- _ "IH LINE OF THE M.E. 114, OF THE N.E. 1/4. 5'T' G'"A , 9'F,T - ___ -'"' © -1 'S7 20' M - Bs-iu 73 6f-'1 5 UEtn}- -- -- _ __ _ M:0 _ - - - -t• '•:1 6. 1. n l is I 0E - V. /.:t tas.aa.. ... .....- .........+:::.::: __41: ° 1..:fie . ::: ".,.- ,!* ".1 : o.jro' - ,; ................y. • 7 1 M'Ir Tr1 r42.bQI• /4ns: -t• , yyvIGv A. _ :.23 ' .. . 2. fir:f:1' >t.L ::s . 1. sQ1 i' i 1 . ::i'p:T..C0 1z:r 1 4 . '.1'. j A yl.. i:fit'x : ,:31"L1. ... .. r,1 . Ju . AV :1 LJf11.a•r o : )EG Z 2...v.1. gyp, .\ CVa"z w'1 12• i 1: i :• :'::•:: }' 1j.. t i 'i s '.r I. :1 •.1 Y ... . I 0 l.--.%V. ' M1.z y. j LJ• -' :C:i - - .5:1J17.:= _ .. vi..i- - .. A._ :, -' 1• : :tp.1.1 :' :13 '. N cq :t: . T t.. I ii1 / --------- r v..: is =- r+::re: =. -. rir:..: -. _.+»•.... •S. .4: '.r _ _ ___ - -- - - a .6 In Z tea ,'E22 -J .. V /1 I . . I.. .. SL`i!IL 15DC. No:..751+5 ^oai:. :LC.2F - OGC. Nv. !357522 T16. ate. :`' -- . "sr,.1:'T" -- 1 i48F1 r - 1i9.2Fi' . - t : /,... ..' 1 .... * . . :'..."'.. *--*--*-.-... ..... 75S b07e. O Ica /' ofr1• Y. r J 7-V. <; I .,T1 :1 r i Is I al - - 4 C` L , A.S.- -: V _Nt T L- - - - - - -- --f - ._ -Y - - .. L I i re 11 r 1 t.tom m _L _ l.I -'/ 1L:L _ __ «_ -- -__ -__S Vii.:. ::: _ l'. :... -:..-.-:-::-:-*-:- - .'DAD +. D r ° -ir r1•1-1'i.. O ...2'ic::r. 7 --r - FP a: \.is Y_e: 1 l U 1i •7TcCM7ti>i s,!Flv •:r-Y'r •UT1.OT $ - 3J.n -s. ... EX.: - r •F.a' 1-- a ::_vw ,., . 11 I C21 I o- S.a'k IL2 'iiv . iG :tG: ----Ix / 1 ,R 1 n• 1L_R J , 1 1T1 sI r j I i '`; 1.' ::'. :' r.i I . - ' •1 / . _ .e' ' i o is In - L_I ' ) . r- -v. i r vI i • Q'.1ii1 .I is .! , k.•' rc - . :1 . . .:... .....f.. ... - ...... *- - , I -- ...A..... I - - .--\ i . r :i, 2 : 1 1 1 `. L ••' . t ... ._ /p •1 1 :_,:. rL- -' A- flJ.00't. Grj • 4lci' 'aG t.. :\ .. ' so'S'VA E + • * fB9'46 ^ rn5rlc:_•. 7. dt 274.P4: , %:. :• r w t i + i 1 ` ' - S N1N M'1 ! i I 1 C ^9! <: 13 :_ . 1 0 CI . 1% 16C " \\ ,,,. ' t 1 30 Wt. 1 j ..11 C : -t T 1 / -, % 4 I I \ i { I j I 1 M 1 1rL -.. - - _ --. -. _ - - q 5. COR. OF Tr: C. i C . _._. _._l . I ate. M. . ?'/4. OF 111E N.E. 1/4. 5 111 %IRE OF jW W.C., 1/4, OF TIC NOATNi AST 1/4, SLC. 4. 1' T' 1C. 4. T. 29, A. 2? i i t^ ! t i -I -.) F l , .\ I ,_. N I *Y'V -, " * , r r ^1 I ; - I (f I - OVE;L. rHASE 1 AREA TABULATIONS: 51NGLE FAMILY: 75 ACRES (13 LOTS) TOWNHOME: 12.8 ACRES (36 LOTS) APARTMENT: 6.9 ACRES (122 UNITS) CITY STREET ROW: L6 ACRES TOTAL TUD INCLUDING OUTLOTS: TOTAL UNITS: 222 TOTAL AREA: 44.5 ACRES TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY AREA: 14.4 ACRES (26 LOTS) TOTAL CITY STREET 'ROW. 2,4 ACRES FAMILY AREA: 12.0 ACRESNETSINGLEFAL EA: 19 AAR .3 CRES 72TOTALTOWNHOME LOT5 i T COMPLEX AREA: 6 R 1TOTALPARTMENGOM .8 ACRES 122 UNITS) IOA ( ) 1 ENDOTROW. 1. ACRESTOTALM IT 1•ER f55.0 UN 5 ACREGR055DENtTY 1 C `FAMILY NINLOTE TfR_ SITE): ?_1 200 SfAVERAGE5GLE ( ) AVERAGE TOWNHOME DOU15LE LOT (ENTIRE SITE): 11,900 SFj I',- 1 IN DItD u R 3 0 11. P11L'-- cam\ J u ' rl3.6tiN e / G /, Y' JLj;•a t- 1" A J v as1 -n.r tir 't : I v r:O.1 so i1 --- .. ..... . --. - , ,r. Si. /\G..4 s rG , -, I- ........... 1 L oI __ , , '.'..*..*.,.*.,.,.,.,:...,:".,.*...:... ! -I- '. , .. .. .. I.- :?Z.N 11":: .1. ..... .,. .,..*. '. *.,.....l.'..' ".,.,.: *.* ... - .*."-'.'.l ... * '... . ......... . .... .....: ': . . I.' . . ....... ...%, . . .. : ,_ ", . .... .........ATM €1T i 1 .. I p 1: I. , . .MF - - .. .*"*., "...................... ..... .... ............... 0 €X ..': -*.-l*--*l.7.l.l....... ,I '**'*'* " { JV .. - 4i ;-! z". -- t.C I I r' I 1 ice' rr fD0 1 IL MNOOT 40E. KOW ni SRI 186 UNIT ul i : 1 I 1fOWNHOME ! o r : r - j C- OMFLEX o re' 1... . -..r -- . _. ' -- - • •• -. -f_. i - -. -_ - - -- _- /•. i r, «,t. roc 1 ! • .- 11 ! -. - - - -- 4 A r 1 „ 1 • i z I ' - F9.40- w 1'- .; / r: % I VENUE - i 3.E. CDR. Or THE _ I ~•. ; - - 1 . - 2 . N.E. 1/4, - aE ;K-*. . 114, , 50 • Sr0 '! I SEC,. -*. T. ,, Q. 2P. : i ' 21. H.:Z1 Ix.I , , I I . 1 f i , PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT 24 4 N Attachment 6 I..-.'.*.*.7..*.. '"', ' PROPOSED PHASE 1 I ..,:.*.,.,.I*:.,.,........... PROPOSED LOT AREAS S:n ir~! Y , 2` w • . _ .. . -1 -- - -- 77.--:-:;-.-.,..- ..... .. ...... ....--..-.......-......,.........,..........-.,:......-..--..-.:-.-.-.-.-..-..-.---.-.-.-.::.-.:.-.-:-.-".,...-...-..-...,7.I _.17:::!:,:,:! r:is :- ;... 't. ... 1':.' AA \ 1 *: 1. J' /1 Y . ijjo2E:.t"" : .I i,lAM,j.' .2.1 V i n.Jt :' :.....L t ./ : x:. 31 ;' :',501 •A' ,i' . . 1. :: 944 , ' I L;-:4*!` . ., . ..., ....I ......... .... . X * ::f' :::::.::.: .::: -:gf:':'. t: Y :'. I :] 5 ,,-.. .. C. r ..:a :1:M. . t.. Q .1 :::•:i' •1!:: 1':.:. i:: • .. `v :.t::.fV4' 1. - """ . . :g ::gip::' _`+ - :.::::.— .11:': :: ....., * .... . ..... I : I.I....' :-_ LAODMHOME. I I . ......... ::.7.*.7., _ 1. -:*.-- -.1, p :.%.,.:: . ... ... :_ I-.-...,--- r."..,:_..,.1_1:11:.. COXM .... ... *. I Ij .: -...7 D DESIGN DATA 3 (0SITEAREA = 44.5 ACRES I rrr CURRENT ZONING = MIXED 1 PROPOSED ZONING = MU.D w — SINGLE FAMILY: MINIMUM LOT AREA = 10.000 SF TOWNHOUSE: 1MINIM :-UM LOT AREA 12,000 5F 1 r1 PUBLIC ROW WIDTH ='60 FT. PUBLIC STREET WIDTH = 52 FT. F -F ` C•. PRIVATE ROW WIDTH = 40 FT. i` PRIVATE 2STREETWIDTH = 8 FT. F -F [•,• p:-_ _- - __ __ . .- - ----_z-- . ::.:: . - 4 :* * "”, --:.,. .... . .... ..". . . M. - ... ... - -. ....,-M .. , m ..... -:M......... .1 /h. :L i y11i': -,\ `_ -4 / 4r -- * , * " * -, -M - , , ..z.".,. I I : - tt f r ji ..i•e. M. i I'. 1. ..1 1 r'Ir.L.' _ .... 1;.F.. ..,..,. ... W:. - 'r..:: -. * * -- :: r 1. i' r::: .. . ... . .i / 1 J i t'L• .itiro.r i 1. .. 1 _ fi1 .•-R SiG1 . _r' ! —_ t:: ::::::rr , v J,...r• C C ' f , . Y r1• -_7 ::: t•J :.:: =: :: u iL' -rt.is iLL : 1 f1 • l I 1 1.. VIJ F Wl I' -it :,rr :: 1' '.f1.:: .::': :•... :.MI IliJ 1 - ii 1. 1 t" —2 a•2N ':;i J. .: .I v 1.i iOly,Z r• i ' vwte ' ti• . E:: fa:'YF@ t]EP.MIIiiEO i k ' : ..; . - I M ' %•itti':.r. r Ir1 if T. 6,•I C • .11 rkn'r'C as: i1 " 1 --t i:. . ' I 6. 1 1 K i :l, :':1.ir/1. .G. :1 • I.:.i .. • w.-.• .-,y.. . t.. 1 r. , 1 ! /: 1 i -i:1 T 1i 1- 1. - -• _ K f .II 1 MN DOt I i 11 : -o . . . . . . .. . i --. / ... ...r. .. f i r / _ I L _ _ w •+ ;r.I. _ r /0 .,. t..{ i. -....... ... 1 1 . % t j L . . ': I I 1. . V - i __ \j .. . . . . a. F .:......... . ...... .... t"• C: G , T: i 1 1. j• 1:. .. • \ ,, 1 ' ' • Q : , • . i :1 :.::t:: 1 ,/,. 1, 1--, : . I " :1 . . A I k , 1 'I . I L. - — - -o . . r. I i o ! — — _.. I I . . I 1. .11 i J ' I 'I I -, P ._, i `\! - H " " ' I E" I I.- i Kr,l H:. M. 44-- i A ,kl. .:. - " L. -) 1_. j,. v : ) V 11 I-L W I I .., Cv IL. . i itS i .c. • SITE PLAN 25 4 N ROW i - I rrr i . - -_ .--:-.- - . OU1W1 C I I 1 1, Z. 1 . 1 i i .: . 1 1 I i A ,:Ill 1 1 I, I I i 1 T• AVENUE I -!.- 1, I 1 fc IN I ; SITE PLAN 25 4 N Attachment 7 ti I Ash. Ir 1 i 1 •: ING7 locsVon or Fipel:ne brassi1 on few maridngs J :• 4 • ; }• , ' • ;~ . • -•' • j i =• •/ '. Jar, hr: 1 , • ! 1. ._.• +' .•••:?;•' + i', fir , .....:: . w. .._.. ; ,:. rJ • `•• •. •—.. • 1. • r . « .., • ,yam.. • , :` fi {•'.i• -' :; .i %;;iy,• - _ . It . : •` • jam "'`.•. ; •, ' .• N.• :: ! a)rr 1 1 6'19 81B.A = • r i { s V ' i j +••• / - _ . •, ms 's i M11111dR6tI11b !.'• •"' •' ' ' , 1 v ftis Mrlrrr 2• PROPOSED GRADING PLAN 26 4 N Attachment 8 n 7 - P4 2,4, 25, 32A 21 20 L,orer of Pie!lsur ; on El raw ty loo lf) GEM-_ MAUL IIRA MAWR Olt. i ME : % : Sp. I 0=2 Pam PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN 27 Attachment 9 Trees nwrW As located in this fWJ And me Ww*4&db CArW Inc. 5tt;d contains 121 lar trees as desGr1bdd b the Cit of Maplewood. T and number summarized as fbilows: Oak 29 Elm 11 Ash 40 Mack Cherr 14 1340mwd 4 Pine r/ r-- L-j 3 Rr 4 -J, f E Of A -51r- CT:Z r-- L-j At this tuna it is anticip i that all lar trees vAll be removed, as the grading 11mfte for b e pr exterid to the propert boundar Minor so a fti W made to the el-adime plan which Would allow prasarvavon of some trees. The size of trees to be planted will be at 1wart 2.5 Inchas In diarnew. The locaubm And spoolds has not yet been determined. tt'af%on ae F wi. 4baw 0 El 1 i' 3 Rr 116*ji A f E a. At this tuna it is anticipi that all lar trees vAll be removed, as the grading 11mfte for b e pr exterid to the propert boundar Minor so a fti W made to the el-adime plan which Would allow prasarvavon of some trees. The size of trees to be planted will be at 1wart 2.5 Inchas In diarnew. The locaubm And spoolds has not yet been determined. tt'af%on ae F wi. 4baw 0 El 1 i' TREE INVENTORY PLAN 28 4 3 f E CT:Z ro L--j Fla D TREE INVENTORY PLAN 28 4 3 E TREE INVENTORY PLAN 28 4 ro D UAL TREE INVENTORY PLAN 28 4 Attachment 10 i_ • - :.... - ...:•r -. •._- .:._..... -tea N.IC. Con. w it! " M &VA u ... t!w.E. VA. or Tow M.E. !/L 0 COUNTY ROAD .0 LIME of THE N.E. 1/4. ar THE M.E. ! /AL COC. 4 . I ... 1al1_ 11 "57 29 - - -_ 89 'S7 ' 28' M 0.73"x` (661. [IEE -•-- -= .--. _.. - It L, i /[ i or N - re Swc..c. •.*N"'' Lots p • E x f,?.r 'UZ. l.I04 W" %L Qt rZ.w6" Two S'ry`c "T•c Hart TML Aftab ~- K oil !"1, FgmK tcRUs w Eii.a 54bit.LL F" Lor W+«o- Rt•IVE • Tao 'Tia s . i • f/•L -+ O C = =--- u1 .7Pt IM- .1•+'T1L Pw,red )Stwur Phu Xaz—owl - - -r -r -r- rte- •- •---- r.•r-- ..._rra _r_._-r----- • - - - - - - - -_ --- • ( VV 11 %• l g eo Ft. ,worn EslEl/roac. wo. lstaob , . oF ooc, uo. MI 1 1C -!p • ' •• s. s 0 i 5- 89'57'32 • E 648.51 o 3um •. A.V'00 600 - E 71.00 C 9'58'24 0E 39 - - -- --- - - - --- - - -- - -.- .- ------------- - - -_ -- -- --- -•- - -- e s 06 • J . 1 - K . W i. - . 0 s 1 1 • `sW.40 • En 11 ' 0i ' 1 CD wa , • M t M At C H o a in N" 46 9 E 59.7L-% r Q It 1 09046 4324 rl -,LvM &- .3r1 W.E. CM. jw L . ...r 4 . Cdi. or TlN: 2 f . - . M °° ;..••... . w. 4. W TW w.E. 1/4. LV E OF E. 114. OF ft IMIJ .T •• ' ,, ` . 4. T. M M. _! summitKOHLMANLAKE t COUNTRY EW OVERLOOK PROPOSED TREE PLAN 29 4 N Attachment 11 Proposed ltitersecwon of Lydia Ave. and Highway 61 Approx scale lit 50 100 10zoo/ 1 100, 7 ron.age oadJ LISTING) PROPOSED) CO PROPOSED NEW DRIVEWAY ' EXISTING PARKING LOT ' 1 LP C6 Z) 0 z ti ti H m O W W HWY 61 Proposed Alignment 0/ PROPOSED INTERSECTION DETAIL 30 4 N Attachment 12 BRENT R. JORGENSON 1235 Summit Court Maplewood, MN 55109 H: 612- 481 -7825 W: 612 - 481 -4076 May 21, 2000 Mr. Kenneth Roberts Community Development Department City of Maplewood 1830 East County road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Roberts: I have read the Neighborhood Survey letter you sent and I also attended the recent meeting that the Development Team had in Gulden's Restaurant. I am a homeowner and my property is adjacent to the South Side of the Proposed Development. There are a couple of areas of great concern with this proposal. Our strongest abjection is the proposed Apartment complex. Apartments in general have a negative impact on property values. This complex also calls for a portion of it to be allocated for Low - Moderate Income housing, which would further erode property values. The high density of this proposal will significantly increase the traffic in our neighborhood to an unacceptable level. Traffic from the majority of the development South of the power lines will be forced to drive down Duluth Street to access North bound Highway 61. The properties adjacent to the project site are currently zoned R with a small portion being M1. We would support development with a majority of the property being zoned R1 and a strip of Ml along Highway 61. Thank -you for your time and consideration. Sincerely,, Brent Jorgenson ;c Ann Jorgenson 31 Attachment 13p 4 A' May 23, 2000 Community Devel DeptYPP City. of Maplewood 1830 E County Rd B Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797 to NL r fA p M A y Mo ma In reference to this proposed building plan offered by Mr Frattalone, we are very concerned about the following issues: 1: ` We DO ' NOT OPPOSE the 34 single houses on Carry Drive nor the 36 unit Townhome complex. The 34 single homes would add value to the existing homes on Duluth St and the Cul de Sacs leading off Duluth St 2. We DO OPPOSE the 122 unit apartment complex for the following reasons; a. Lower the value of current homes on Duluth St and Cul de Sacs to include the proposed 34 single family homes. b, With the current traffic flow on Rte 61, a burden of traffic volume would increase on Duluth St via Lydia Ave to include Jcts Beam Ave and Rte 61. 3, We DO OPPOSE Lydia ave between Duluth St and proposed English Lane for obvious traffic volume on Duluth St. 4. We Attended a meeting with Mr associates and they could not that will occur on Jcts Lydia of Beam Ave and Rte 61. Mr Fr as to the traffic flow during equipment vehicles. Frattalone and his address the traffic problem ave and Rte 61 nor the Jcts attalone was also not clear the construction by PREVIOUS SITUATION OBSERVATION. Reference to the construction of Toyota dealership and Lemetrys Body Shop on Rte 61. 1. The general opinion of the neighborhood on Duluth St and Cul de Sacs were opposed to the construction. They were constructed. 2. We understood that Toyota dealership would refrain of having their employees parking on Beam ave and off loading vehicles on Beam ave. SITUATION REMAINS TO EXIST with the parking and off loading. Comparing the Toyota dealership and Lemetry construction, what are we to believe with.the Frattalone construction. am- 32 2a$ o I NNESO ys T of ra`' Attachment 14 Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road 132 Roseville, MN 55113 June 16, 2000 Ms. Melinda Coleman City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road. B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Subject: Highpoint Ridge Mn/DOT - Metro Division Plat Review #S00 -013A West of Trunk Highway 61 and South of County Road D Maplewood, Ramsey County Control Section 6222 Dear Ms. Coleman: Please be advised that the Minnesota. Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced site plan. Before any further development, please address the following issues: Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often results in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Mn/DOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures. The project developer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impacts of any highway noise. Please direct questions concerning Mn/DOT's noise policy to Jim Hansen (651 -582- 1392) of our Transportation Planning section. Any impact to Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Please direct questions regarding permit applications to Keith Van Wagner (651 - 582 -1443) of Mn/DOT's Permits section. The above comments are in addition to those in our letter correspondence we sent to you dated April 7, 2000. Please address all future correspondence for development activity such as plats, site plans, environmental reviews, and comprehensive plan amendments to: Sherry Narusiewicz Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 west County Road B -2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Please note that Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. An equal opportunity employer 33 Feel free to contact me at (651) 582 -1771 if should have any questions. cerely, Paul Czech Senior Transportation Planner/Local Government Liaison Copy: David Claypool - Ramsey County Barry Morgan - Master Civil & Construction Engineering, Inc. Mn/DOT Division File - C.S. 6222 Mn/DOT LGL File — Maplewood 34 JUL-07-2000 --2000 16 ! 29 BENSH00F & ASSOC. Attachment 15 952 238 1871 P.02/07 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 1 R BOtJI.EVARb, SUM TWO / HOPKINS„ MN 66343 / (962) 2381 C67 / FAX (MM 2W1871 My 7., 2000 Refer to Files 00-2 MEMORANDUM TO: Frank ne FROM: James A. Ben f and Paul D. TClappa RE: Rmults of Traffic Study for Highpoint Ridge I' V E AND BACKGROUND Thb m m =ndum is to the ofd on mffic volumes on nearby sways due to the proMod Highpoint Ridge tit tlevelopma t in Maplewood, W The development is to be located in the southwest carnet of the in 'on of County Road D and 'Y'H 61. As reque d, the scope of our study is to ads questions -- ng the extent to which the proposed develo nnent wf in se., volumes on sU=ts in the resident W neighborhood south of the Hi, lint Ridge sib, we have ad reA th questions by ordbg exiathig volumes on p th ley affected ar is and by pred g the volume in that will be caused by the proposed development. There are four components to the pMosed x idendal development. Fiat 28 single. - fhily homes axe proposed on a U-ft extension of Carey Heights Drive that conneeU with Duluth Avenue.. Second, a 122 -munit apaxtment wmpiex is pMosed east of the single - .y homes. 7U apartment complex would be bounded on the east by the eac t g TH 61 service drive. Tom, 36 townhome nits are proposed on the west and south sills of the a, t complex. Finally, a 36 -unit t+ownhome complex is north of the single -fear Uy homers and south of County Road D. new 36 is would have dwir Wle ao= via County Road D. Three other roads are proposed to serve the trLffia needs of the development. An east/west mad (Lydia Avenue) originating at the south service drive &WM is proposed. Then, a north/south road (English Laze) located west of the P1 14 cornplez would awn ect to Lydia Avenue and servo a portion of the townhomas and the apartment 35 SUL -07 -2000 16!29 BENSHOOF & ASSOC, 952 239 1171 P.03/07 qtr. Fmnk Frattaione -2- ,duly 7. 2000 aomplex. An additional cast/west mad (Ir*point Court) Is proposed south of the apartment complex. fur study c ud tw+pM -1 03 fO movement of traffic within the development. 1 asmum that fl=e is no minectron provi ded between the 28 single heady homes a the ma and apanent to the ust. All of the singlewfi=fly ho Uaffic would udEn Duluth Sheet or Cdr Heights Drive. The =ffic geneated by the townhomes and agents would have its only 11cm at the service drive can TH 61. Scenario 2 considers that accuse be provided between the uwnhome/ eat MOM and the ftle-fiunily home Pwaons of the development. Under this scmafio,, traf from the &8low hvaws would have the opd= of the TH 61 accm via LY&I Avenue extending to Duluth Stmt, The townhome/epattment traffic wow also have the option of u#,ih ing cess to Beam Avenue via Duluth Shed through the eaisdng neighborhood to the south' TRAMC VOLUMES In oMer to establish existing daily try volts= in the neighborhood south of the PoW development, 48 -hour uxffie volume counts were made et four 3 where the itnp of the p development are attt—i These acations are 41 on residential sUats Stith multiple existing residential dfivn- along their 19ths. 'Theme ins an ia follows* Duluth Sit, just north of Beam Ave. Cam Heights Drive, just of Frank Street Lydia Avenue, just ea$t of Walter St. Fmnk Str+aet, just nwth of Bem Ave, Theme coo wee a YWednesday, June 28, 2000 dvough Frida , June 30, 2000It. usg sutorrt ttafft reou t ( A.) equipment. At the tie of the A p1a -ent OWKva o wire made of the tag Mfc patterns and roadway "ta in the area of the developnmt, Uft the site Asn for the posed dev opment sad information published b the a j i of 'fan Rigmeers M), the new #mpg geaeraW by the peopoud t way esti=Wd, T& I provides the trip aea=fion for the px sed dev opmentt Under aU I=d uses, it is eacpeeted that 50% of the daily trip wiH be Ong to the development and 50% of the dail trips gilt be leaves the developmet. 36 JUL- -07- -2000 16; 30 BENSt OOF & ASSOC. 952 2:38 1671 P.04/07 1k. IN& FmtWone •3+ July 7 2000 die Ova development is expecW to Se nate nearly 1500 daily trips. Of these 211 trips tolm the a taomglex dy onto County laid D and not travel dmugh the ielghborhood in quadcm,, hnzHy homes are to genet 268 day trigs. The remaining 1020 tags wilt be to/from the eat Un ome c - ,Olex and the COMPlat Table 1 Dad{ ZSrip Generation for H19hpoia Ridge Devdopaoaent land Use East Townttomes size DweBin Rn 36 Rate 5.86 Dafiy Trip Ends 211 A t COMAIM 122 6.63 809 Snbtotd 1 1020 S' lc F=fly Homes 2$9.57 268 StbWtal2 128$ North Towahome Complex 36 5.86 211 T°at 1499 nmuO the uw athe Wake t c. &em as ob ved by our site visit and the traffic ficilities ofthe mmou.ndiag area, trip diaribntiun pe=nug by route and direction weave deteanined as follows for the new trips Son ated by the dwelopment. 4595 of trips tolfrnm the outh on 51 1096 of the trips tolfirom the east an Beam Avenue 395 of the trips to/from the west on County Road D 35 46 of the trips to/from the north on TH 61 5 eftrips from development to tho east on County Road D; triese trips are e to wb= to the development via 16941M 61 37 JUL -07-2000 1G!30 RENSHOOF & ASSOC. 952 238 1671 P.05/07 W. Fm* Fmttaione July T, 20M Casing the yLeceding directional distribution tag , tamps were they assigned to the midways sag the developmont. The amiprnent of 4evelopment tamps to particular mutes accounted for the ' g points; DAccmprovisisofthetwoonn +mod ario$ County RM D has 3A mess ut TH 61. ft turns me not pe=itW from County Road D) 1U north entrance of the ice dove prates right -turn mss only. The south enbance of the swvice drive provides s. Bam Avenue intersect 61 with '• ntrnt and erodes lei ' U= onto and off of Bmm Av&iue. Using the above con ldmtons and the relative wnvenlence of aU acom points, ftft gerera#ed by the development was assigned to the radway system. Linder both sos, traf& from the single-f ntily homes and the amxtmentltownhome complex was considered individuUy to account for the their ty to individual amass per . Furdw, as different routes are Mml to he used, bsffie 4 ,g the development was cider e d separately from the traffic exiting the development. Under SCenado 1, there is no ty for the ap; mtltownhome. complex traffic W travel though the neighbrorhood. Under Smario 2, we expect that 45 % of the +may ttf& to/f the single -family hones wM nulm use of the Lydia Avenue access to 61, and 14 % of the daily fait tolffom the townhomes and arm ents witl travel through the subdivision south of the proposed development. F&Iowi the trip ,ges1eation and awlimment, the addita fi genemted by the development was added to the exisg ftuft using streets in the neighborhood to the south. Fib i show exisdag and inept y h volumes at four any iach - t re meet - - -- --o l ' t n r a 1 h .neatest inee m y o volumes, #ed on Carey Heights Drive snd Duluth Street with an additional 134 daffy vehicles at mh location. Under Soto 2, the n=eatest i teas is at Duluth Street with an inc reae of 161 dsdy vehiccles, Lamy Heights Drive would ea Penence an additional ltd des per day under Scanario 2 Further, under both scenarios, all Vol remain below 680 dailY kesveh. 0 JUL-07-2000 16:30 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 952 238 16?1 P,06/07 BCENARI0 • NO CONNECTION BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND APARTMENTS/CONDOS TO EAST PROPOSED DEVELOPMENr OWNDARY 4 12-1 mmm 361/4" UFAU AM SCENARIO 2 m CONNEC710N PROVIDED BETWEEN SWGLE FAMILY HOMES AND APARWENTIR/CONDOS TO FAST I INAAA. 4-(C-q I 0 07 361/521 FRANK FRATTALONE TRAFFIC STUDY FOR FIGURE I HIGH-POINT RIbQ 1INYMFFIC MAPLEWOOD Lumm 39 JUL-07•2000 16:31 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 952 238 16?1 P-07/0? Mr. Fm* FratWone w6q,Jul 7, 2000 CONCLUSIONS The Metwpo Council has vstabfishad a dail volume thmshold of 1,000 veMdes for ant W s6teft- This means that redd=U ShTeU with traft volumes Wow 1,,= vehicles per da are exwtW to opm safel and in a mmer to the of *e oftfhood* The, dW b c volu=s on theaffi Ahk&. La within ftlyUA n4mhborhood south of the propsW drieWpmmt mnain below 6W veMcles per da A& -,#ftawdaboth Given this,, we me co that ft Eff Ridge IdevelopmentWMnotcause - Paulas Oft the nearb residen" sbvft under ei &zveloptnent T&ou our stud we identified an itmn of safet concem under existin conditions. NO controI i S ,& -- CaMypwvWdatftdonof hts Frank Sweet. Given the existin volumes and poor vidbUit to ft south from the east le of ift %*In d%M& ---tMS in we AM - I Cit to consider two-WIL Stop -- fbr eldw the north and south lep or f a* and west le of ft"'s inWrsecdw. In of twos wa stop control w*W i npmove safet tbr existin and pot=Oal future traffic at this TOTAL P.07 40 JUL -10 -2000 14:05 8ENSH00P & ASSOC* 952 23e 1671 P.02/02 13ENSHOO ASSOCIATES, IN CM TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 10417 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD. SUITE ' fW0 / NOPKtNS, MN 55343 / (9S2) 238-166 FAX (952) 238.1871 July 107 , 2000 REFER - M FIS — 52 W, Frank Fone 3066 Spruce Street Little Canada, MN 5 511 7 Supplemental Traffic Infomation Regarding Proposed I-fighpoint Ridge Dev Jopmant Dear Fly This letta is to supplement the traffic review we premnted in a memorandum dated July, 7, 2000 for Y= #~- d e development its the City of Maplmood. Specifically, you have asked us to address the extent to which the development would increase volumes on T 61, Based on data from the Nfirmesota Department of Tramp ort Won, the event volume on TH 61 at the location of your proposed Lydia Avenue Intersection is 28 500 vaWeles per day. If your development VMm constructed in acccrdanoe with Scenario 1 described in ow My 7 mpott, n=ely no c=ection between Lydia Avwue and Duluth Street, the dally volume an TA 61 would lnerem by 390 vehicles (one percent) north of Lydia Avenue and by 670 vehicles( per t) south of Lydia Avenue. If your development were conmucted in accordance with Scenario 2 described in our July 7 repots with a co on bet Lydia Av+e and Duluth Street the daily volume on TH 61 would increase by 340 vehicles (one pmw t) north of Lydia Avenue and by 580 voWdes (two pint) south of Lydia Avenue, As indicated above, the volume of development trips added to TH 61 is very small relative to the existing volume on TH 61, with this Very small increase, we are confident that the Hi 1point Ridge dove opment wH1 not cuse any sisMficant 'Impacts to Vffic flow on Tip 61. ke y, T 0" & ASSOCIATES, amen A. hoof TOTAL Ps02 41 Attachment 16 LAND USE PLAN CHANCE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Frank Frattalone proposed changes to the city's land use plan from R -1 (single dwellings), R -1S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) for the site. WHEREAS, this change applies to property for the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D and west of Highway 61 in Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the applicant also requested a change to the land use plan to drop the planned minor collector street between County Road O and Highway 61. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On June 19, 2000, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the western part of the proposed plan (west of the existing M -1 zoning line), including the plan amendment for the area west of the M -1 line. 2. On July 10, 2000, the city council discussed the proposed land use plan changes. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. 3. On July 24, 2000, the city council again considered the above - referenced requests. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council the above - described changes for the following reasons: 1. The development would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. 2. The town house and apartment sites in the development are proper for and consistent with the citys policies for medium and high- density residential uses. These include: a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing and proposed low density residential and commercial land uses. b. It is on an arterial street and is near a collector street. 3. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. The proposed single dwellings will separate the proposed town houses and apartments from existing homes. b. There should be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing local residential streets. The proposed street pattern keeps the town house and apartment traffic separate from the proposed and existing single dwellings. 4. The city nor the developer plan to build the proposed collector street between County Road D and Highway 61 because the of the existing and proposed grades, the existing power lines and the existing pipelines make it difficult to build a street in this area. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 2000. 42 Attachment 17 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Frank Frattalone, representing Frattalone Excavating, applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for the Highpoint Ridge residential planned unit development (PUD). WHEREAS,this change applies to undeveloped property for the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D and west of Highway 61. The legal description of these properties are: PID:04- 29- 22 -12- 0009 -5 Description:PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX E 160 FT THE S 100 FT OF N 358 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 PID:04- 29- 22 -12- 0008 -2 Description:PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX E 160 FT THE S 202 FT OF N 560 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 PID:04- 29- 22 -12- 0001 -1 Description:PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 E 100 FT OF N 158 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NE 114 (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 PID:04- 29- 22 -12- 0002 -4 Description:PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX N 158 FT LYING E OF CAREY HEIGHTS DRIVE AS SD DRIVE IS DESC IN DOC NO 1634533; THE N 1443.8 FT OF PART OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LYING ELY OF WLY LINE OF SD DRIVE. ALSO, E 130 FT OF PART OF SD 1/4 1 /4 LYING S RN 22 PID:04- 29- 22 -12- 0010 -5 Description:PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 SUBJ TO CO RD AND WITH RD ESMT AND EX E 160 FT THE N 258 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 PID:04- 29 -22 -12 -0006 Description:PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 S 100 FT OF N 1044 96/100 FT OF PART WLY OF CL OF RD ESMT IN DOC 1634533 OF E 9 ACRES NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO ES MTS) IN SEC 4, TN 29, RN 22 PID:04- 29 -22 -11 -0006 Description:ALL THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4), OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, EXCEPT THE EAST 661.6 FEET OF THE NORTH 1,006 FEET, AND SUBJECT TO COUNTY ROAD D, AND SUBJECT TO A GAS PIPELINE EASEMENT LOCATED THEREON PID: 04- 29 -22 -11 -0005 Description: TRACT A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 322, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND THE SOUTH 401.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 1006.00 FEET OR THE EAST 661.80 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, EXCEPT THE NORTH 676.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THENCE WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, 5.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTHERLY 741.30 FEET TO A POINT 15.00 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID 43 NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, 15.00 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE: THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. P I D: 04- 29- 22 -12- 0007 -9 Description: THE SOUTH 224 96/100 FEET OF THE NORTH 834 96/100 FEET OF THE EAST 9 ACRES OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 4 TOWN 29, RANGE 22, EXCEPT THE EAST 160 FEET THEREOF, TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS BY FOOT AND BY VEHICLE TO AND FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY OVER AND ALONG THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY TO WIT: THE WEST 60 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF THE NORTH 834.96 FEET OF THE EAST 9 ACRES OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22 All in Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On June 19, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the western part of the proposed development for the permit. 2. On July 10, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyoneatthehearingachancetospeakandpresentwrittenstatements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. 3. On July 24, 2000, the city council again considered this conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, includin g streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 44 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan and preliminary plat date - stamped June 30, 2000 except where the city requires changes. The developer shall revise the grading, utility, tree planting and other project and construction plans to follow the site plan and preliminary plat dated June 30, 2000. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, trails, tree and driveway and parking lot plans. 4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall give the city an easement for this pond and shall be responsible for getting any needed off -site pond and drainage easements. 5. The developer or contractor shall: a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. C. Remove the debris, junk, garbage and travel trailers from the site. 6. This approval does not include the final design approval for the duplexes, townhomes or for the apartment buildings. The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping and site plans for these to the community design review board (CDRB) for approval by the CDRB. 7. The city shall not issue any building permits for construction on an outlot (per city code requirements). The developer must record a final plat to create buildable lots for any outlot in the preliminary plat before the city will issue a building permit. 8. The city council shall review this permit in one year. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 2000. 45 Attachment 18 NO PARKING RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Maplewood has approved a residential PUD and preliminary plat known as Highpoint Ridge. WHEREAS, the developer wants to have reduced street right -of -way widths and reduced street pavement widths in this development. WHEREAS, the city has approved reduced street right -of -way widths and reduced street pavement widths in the development, subject to on- street parking restrictions. WHEREAS, Section 29 -52(b) of the city code allows variations from the city code standards if they do not affect the general purpose of the city code. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that Maplewood prohibits the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of all public streets less than 28 feet wide and prohibits parking on one side of the public streets that are 28 feet to 32 feet wide in the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D and west of Highway 81 in Section 4- 29 -22. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 2000. 46 JUL . 20. 2000 11: 2eRM July 20, 2000 Melinda Cole City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 High Point Ridge Dear Melinda, NO. 529 P.2 F* Me FRAWALONE EXCAVATING & GRADING IN'Co 3066 Spruce Street St Paul MN 55117 631 ) 484-0449 * Fax (65t) 484-7839 www.fmfrattalone.com -!- r' As you are aware. the approval of the proposed High Point Ridge project was tabled at the City Council meeting on Monday, July 10, 2000. The project is scheduled to be discussed at the City Council meets on Monday, July 24, 2000. I am requesting a conta'uanoe of this discussion until the meeting that is scheduled for Monday, August 14, 2000. Hopefully this will fit into the agenda -scheduled for the City Council meetfng. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, P.M. F ttalone Excavati & & Grading, Inc, Drank M, Fra talone L President/C.E.O. FMFAmb 9 COMMERCIAL o INDUSTRIAL , MUNICIPAL t U11LITIES % DEMOLITION E ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA ITEM NOwmmK MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Electrical Permit and Inspection Fees DATE: July 17, 2000 INTRODUCTION Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified jected Mr. Jim Manteufel, of Summit Inspection Services, is requesting that the city update its fee schedule for electrical permits and inspections. Mr. Manteufel and Summit Inspection Services have been providing electrical inspection service to Maplewood since 1995. BACKGROUND On April 23, 1990, the city council approved an ordinance amendment addressing electrical permits, inspections and fees. Specifically, Section 9 -234 of the code is about the adoption of the Minnesota State Board of Electricity Rules and Regulations. This code section says that the city is the Minn ElectricityadoptsMinnesotaStateBoardofElectricity Rules by reference, except the fees, which shall be established by city council resolution. DISCUSSION The State Board of Electricity recently enacted a new fee schedule for electrical permits and inspections. Maplewood uses the state inspection forms for all electrical permits that are taken out in the city. The state has listed their fees on this new form. However, for the city to collect the correct fees, the city council must adopt a resolution that says we will follow the state fee schedule. If the city council approves this request, the proposed city fee schedule will follow the state's forms and fee schedule. Please also see the attached memo (and attachments) from the Maplewood Building Official starting on page two. This provides more information about electrical permits, inspections and fees. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on page 12. This resolution adopts a new electrical permit and fee schedule for Maplewood that follows the State of Minnesota Board of Electricity fee schedule. kr /p: misc /elec2000. mem Attachments 1. July 3, 2000, memo from Maplewood Building Official 2. Electrical Fees Resolution Attachment 1 MEMO TO: Director of Community Development FROM: Building Official SUBJECT: Electrical Fees DATE: July 3, 2000 The State Board of Electricity has informed the City effective July 1, 2000 the State will be enacting a new fee schedule. The state electrical permit will reflect this schedule. Maplewood's electrical inspector, Jim Manteufel of Summit Inspection Services Ltd., follows the state guideline fee schedule and uses the state foams and is requesting that Maplewood revise their fee schedule to conform to the state schedule. The State surveyed several cities and determined that their fees were low and had not been revised since 1988, therefore the legislature passed legislation amending the inspection fee schedule. The primary change in the fee schedule is that in lieu of separate fees for individual circuits the new schedule has catagorized the individual circuits and feeders into 2 ranges. Most catagories are combined and reduced. Maplewood reduced their electrical fees when Summit Inspection Services, Ltd was approved to provide electrical inspection service for the city in 1995. Summit used the state fee guidelines as a basis for their charges to the city. It is recommended that Maplewood amend their fee schedule to conform to the fee revisions by the State Board of Electricity. Attached are copies of our current fee schedule which is the same as other cities served by Summit, and the proposed fee schedule. Attachments: 1. Existing Maplewood electrical fee schedules. 2. Existing electrical permit fee schedules. 3. Proposed fee schedule. 4. State Board of Electricity form. 2 MAPLEWOOD:*. Togei .her We On ELECTFRIC. L- PERMIT FEES MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE-TO: City of Maplewood, 1630 - E. County- Road B, Maplewood, MN 55109. CALLS FOR INSPECTION: CaII Jim IUlan #euf! at Summit Inspection Service_ between the hours of x:30 a.m. 9:30 a. rn:, Monday through Friday, - at 651- 653 -444 or .1 -426 - 1319 MAXIMUM /MINIMUM FEE INFORMATION e,:.............. $ 1.00 ea. Minim fee (bile only)......... 44:669060 .....0400 :..0 0 :....:.1b 0.41 .0 :0 :0 0 a: a 0 a 0 a a 0 a a a w 0 0 P$ :t?0 Minimurn. - fee; (r and final): kilo 0s :.......:.... :..... .......................:.30.00 Maximum fee (three inspections) Transformers /Gen6rators (per unit)... S16 lefamilyresidence'(not over-200 amp ) ..... :000oose: @so.66 @ * &so 0604006 asso Maximum apartment complex (first 20 units).,,....** *Soso . 0000.0..0 ass Additionalunits -over 20 ......:........:.....:.........,..........:.,............ ....................::....:....20.OQlea. Swimming Pools (per inspection)...,., .... ...::.................... :..........................::.. * 04.06. :.....a. Service Replacement (0 to 200 am p service)...:..o ....... ...... &seaow... - ....* *owes.....:..:.. ` 16.00 FEES FOR MISCELLANEOUS INSTALLATIONS Sign Transformers (per unit) ................................. ....................... 9. 066............... Street Lighting (per standard plus circuits)e,:.............. $ 1.00 ea. Traffic Signals ' (per standard plus circuits).............. 0. 100000 00 ...... as ease ass a r.... *siege .. *so .. e..2.00 ea. Transformers /Gen6rators (per unit)...Goa * a 66006666804000 00 a.............5.00 ea. Plus circuit/feeder charges Plus for each ten (10) kva .......... ............................... ............................000 a too 00.00900 3.00 Maximum fee for any Transformer/ Generator ....................... 0 %Q 0 0 o ........ ........................40.00 Sign Transformers (per unit) ................................. ....................... 9. 066...............5.00 Plus circuit/feeder charges Plus for each ten (10) kva .............. . .....:......Goose% Mae 00.0000.00.00 *6000 Remote Control and Signal Circuits Plus circuit/feeder charges First ten (10) openings ............................owe .. .................. *0 * *so *.we as 96...... Sao? 0.0:5.00 Each additional ten ( 1-0).... ......................000600........agoeswewages * 0000... 0 9 2.00 p inspections.Re -Ins ections or additional .. ...............................15.00 ea. Circuits and Feed 0 - 100 amp $4.00 Se 0 - 200 amp 16.00 101 ' 200 amp 6.00 300 amp 20.00 201 - 300 amp .10.00 400 amp 25.00 400 amp 12.50 500 .amp 30.00 500 amp 15.00 600 amp 37.00 600 amp 17.50 800 amp 58o00 700 amp 20.00 1000 amp 72.00 800 amp 22.50 1200 amp 86.00 900 amp 25.00 1600 amp 114.00 1000 amp 27.50 2000 amp 142.00 1200 amp 32.50 2500 amp 177.00 1600 amp 42.50 3000 amp 212.00 Add .50 cents for state surtax to the total permit fee on all electrical permits. OFFICE OF COMMUNITY D 3 612 -770- 4560 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1 830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 PERMIT APPLICATION INFORMATION Homeowners and Electrical Contractors: Use a "State Form (available at the city office). Make check payable to the City of Maplewood. Mail the check, with the white and pink copies of the permit, to City of Maplewood, 1830 County Road B East, Maplewood, MN 55109. CIRCUIT CHARGE INFORMATION The fees for circuits are charged for each new circuit installed, for each existing circuit that is added to or extended, and for each existing circuit split, altered or repaired. In the case of service replacement, there is no charge for circuits that are simply disconnected from the old service panel and re- connected to the new service panel in the same location. MINIMUM FEE INFORMATION The minimum fee is for one inspection only where the circuit charges do not satisfy the minimum fee of 15.00. Example: Garage wiring that will not be covered upon completion and not more than three 0 -100 amp circuits. Three 0 -100 amp circuits x $4.00 ea. = $12.00, notice that the $12.00 figure does not satisfy the $15.00 per inspection minimum. The permit fee would be $15.00 +.50 = $15.50. MAXIMUM FEE INFORMATION The maximum fee of $55.00 for a single family dwelling is for not more than two rough -in inspections and the final inspection. WHO CAN DO WIRING IN MINNESOTA? Single family residences that are not "For Sale" may only be wired by a licensed electrical contractor or the homeowner that resides, or intends to reside in the dwelling at the address listed on the permit form. All other occupancies such as duplexes, apartments, condos, any rental property, commercial, industrial, or public property, shall be wired only by a licensed electrical contractor. Any infraction in the above rules will result in invalidation of the permit on file and no permit except from a licensed electrical contractor will be accepted. All permits shall be on file before commencement of the job or a double fee may be issued. Plastic cables must be strapped at intervals not exceeding 4'/z feet and within 8 'inches of plastic boxes. For proper strapping of cables next to boxes, it is important to drill holes in studs at least 10 to 12 inches above or below box. Plastic cables must not be installed closer than 1'/4 inches from the face . of studs, joists, etc. This applies to cables installed through bored holes br cables strapped to the sides of studs, joists, etc. Cables installed closer than 1 % inches must be protected with metal plates or metal sleeves not less than 1/16 inch thick. Outlet boxes must not be used as sole support for ceiling paddle fans, unless the box is approved for such use. 4 Ground fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs) are required in the following locations: bathrooms, within 6 feet of the kitchen sink; garage, outdoors at grade level; in unfinished basements (except permanently installed sump pump and laundry receptacles). Recessed light fixtures installed in contact with insulation must be I.C. rated (insulation contact). The devices switches and receptacles) should not be installed prior to the rough -in inspection. Open lam li ht fixtures may not be installed in clothes closets. Incandescent light fixtures (with ap9 completely enclosed lamp) must be at least 12 inches from any storage area (shelf area or hanging rods or hooks). Recessed incandescent (with solid lens) or florescent fixtures must be at least 6 inches from storage areas. All measurements are horizontal only, no diagonal or vertical distances will be considered. When . he valuation of an addition, alteration, or repair to a dwelling exceeds $1,000.00 and a building permit is required, smoke detectors must be installed i - accordance with the State Building Code. Consultthe city inspector for requirements and details. FINAL INSPECTION The law requires that a final inspection be made on wiring for all new homes, additions, and remodeling. It is unlawful to occupy a new home before all wiring is completed, inspected, and approved. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMIT HOLDER TO CALL SUMMIT INSPECTION SERVICE FOR FINAL INSPECTIONS when all devices and fixtures have been installed and the wiring is entirely completed. Please do not call the city to set up an inspection.) Your electrical permit is valid for 18 months from the date of issuance. Any wiring not completed within 18 months will require a new permit. The above contains information on some common mistakes made by homeowners -doing their own wiring. Additional information and knowledge will be needed to install the wiring properly. All fixtures: Equipment and materials must be listed and labeled by U.L. or other testing laboratory recognized by the Minnesota State Board of Electricity. ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO, AND SUBMIT IN PERSON OR BY MAIL TO. THE APPROPRIATE MUNIC[PALffY LISTED BELOW: Cit of Circle Pines 2000 Civic Hei Cir. Circle PinM MN SM14 Cit of Gen Lake 4172 Suonk La* White Bear Lake; MN 55110 Cit of Mapkwood IWO E. Co. Rd. B-Mapkwood MN 55109Maplewood ........ b. Ci of Lake 4701 Hw 61- Wbite Bo MN 55110tWw1j" w TOW 1281 B Rd. WIkke Bcs MN 55110 CALLS FOR IN SP' CMON.-. Call St mnfit Inspeaion Senices, Ltd .between the hours of 7-.30am-9:3Oath M-F @ 42 1319 or 653 -495. MAXIMUM/MINIMUM FEE INFORMATION IL . a 0 N - A 0 M .Fee tone U-sa 15. 00 Mitimum Fee (Rtw -in and .................30.00 Fee ( T'Euree U Sin famil residence ( not over 200 amp .........55.00 Maximum Apartment complex ( first 20 units ....................I - -- . ..............................25-00 Additional units over 20 .........................................................20-00 ApanwAm -servwx% house panels & co nmon area wisin additional per fee schcdWo. Swin P00is (per V5.00 FILES FOR MISC. INSTALLATIONS S-i-REEF, T- LIGHTING (Per Standard plus circuits 1. 00 0 TRAFFIC SIGNALS ( Per st4ft plus Cw6cwts) .....................................................S2.00 TRANSIFORMERS/GENERATORS (per unit .......................................................5.00 plus cifiduit/fieder char pho for ewh ten k-va ......................................53.00 mAximum FEE FOR ANY TRANSFORMEWGLNIE ........................40 SIGN TRANSFORMERS (per umt .........5.00 plus circuit/feeder char plus each 10 X3.00 REMOTE CONTROL AND SIGNAL CIRCUI plus Cw*Cw't/feeder char First 10)S5.00 Each additional ( t 0 2. 00 RESIINS ONS, or additional inspections 15.00 CIRCUITS A" FEEDERS SERVIcn 0 - 100" S 4. 00 each 0 - 200&n S 16.00 each 101-200" $6.00 300 20.00 ZO I - 300amp $10.00 400=p 25-00 400ainp 512.50 500amp 30.00 500unp $15-00 600amp 37.00 600amp $17.50 800amp 5900 700n 520.00 1000=p S72-00 800an 522.50 1200amp 96-00 900unp 525.00 1600amp 5114.00 1 000sinp $27.50 2000amp 142-00 1200AM S32.50 2500amp 177.00 1600amp $42-50 3000ainp 212-00 MORE ON REVERSE SIDE I PERMIT APPLICATION INFORMATION 1: tXCTRaCAL COlri'' MACTQRS - Use a "State Farm" H4MWWNERS_ Use "State Form" (avadable at the city offices). Add. SO eats for Stag sw-ChN$t to the totsE pnei fey NOTE: $3479 FM StIR CHARGE FOR CnY OF OAKDALE ONLY Make check payable to the Tre spoiatt 0itipslih Mail the check and white and pink copies to the municaQality. CIRCUIT CHARGE INFORMATION The fees for cimWts art dwpd for each rim circuit installed, for a existing circuit the Is added to or eanoWed, ar for each existing circuit split, altered or repaired. In the.case of sem'ce replacement, therit is no charg four mcwts that am descoected from the old so Vice ps ed to the MI%V s aWYMM Vie! in the sam locatig MINIMUM FEE INFORMATION T'!K rim fft is for gee uu}tion only where the circuit charges do not no* the migitrtum fee of S15.0U rW Iw it beSAM CoveFed 'oo not a the t ec - t circuits. Thor o• 100amp mcwts x S4 .0 S 12.,00, M th m- I ice at the St 2.00 Ifi u e does net satisfy the S 15 . oo r in . fee would he $1 5.00 + . Std vv- S1 5.50. The fc ire a rmSb4n mW fret inspectiOft are Mml is 2 x S15.00 + -50 = $30 $0 The mioireura fee for ce racmialt is 5 .00 for a 0 -2 nriee Flue o ear =1 MAXIMUM FEE INFORMATION Then fee of S5 5.50 fay a skgk £u* dwepipg is fat tit awe flan two rough -in inspeaioas usd the fi at iapectiaa. Fv nain:pectiom-, of =10ie31ioett, or sdmiolw iapecioss, fhe nt is $l 5.04 per inspection. WHO CAN DO WIRING IN MINNESOTA? Sbwe fs y d s t we t Tor Sale's may only be .wined a lcsed eletca! coattactoc or the c-Ft , ar ' tQ r t at gAlvem on the form. All other occu " _ ... - _ PPFI- . In mmcrcest, industn:l, or publicpsi , shall be wired oWy by a Any action to the in iinv idation of the ao !e aid cacto' r ' #pt c+c, from abed. fit paatits swit be on 6k be6ore of the job or a double fee may be iced SPECIAL INSPECTTONS For inspections not covered, or for requested special inspections oTservices, the fee shall he $30 per Stour, including travel tune, plus 24 ctacts per nWe travel, plus reason of equipment or material consumed. OTHER FEES Any fps not fisted in this fee schedule shall he per the most relent State fee schedule. DASUNWITTEES596MPID 0 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES MADE CHECKS PAYABLE TO, AND SUBMIT IN PERSON OR BY MAIL TO: City of Maplewood, 1830 E. Co. Rd. B, Maplewood, MN 55109 CALLS FOR INSPECTION: Call 651- 4261319 between the hours of 7:30am- 9:30am M -F for a same day inspection. MAXIMUM/MINIMUM FEE INFORMATION Minimum fee (one inspection only)20.00 Minimum Fee (Rough -in and Final)40.00 Maximum Fee (Three inspections) Single family residence (not over 500 amp)80.00 Maximum Apartment complex (three to twelve units)50.00 ea. Additional units 25.00 Swimming Pools (Per Inspection)20.00 ea. FEES FOR MISC. INSTALLATIONS STREET LIGHTING (Per standard plus circuits)1.00 ea. TRAFFIC SIGNALS (Per standard plus Circuits)5.00 ea. MAXIMUM FEE FOR ANY TRANSFORMER/GENERATOR up to l Okva 10.00 over lOkva 20.00 SIGN TRANSFORMERS (per unit)5.00 plus circuit/feeder charge's REMOTE CONTROL AND SIGNAL CIRCUITS each system device or apparatus $50 RE- INSPECTIONS, or additional inspections $20.00 ea SERVICES, GENERATORS,OTHER SUPPLY SOURCES OR FEEDERS TO SEPARATE STRUCTURES 0 TO 400 AMPERE 401 TO 800 AMPERE ABOVE 800 AMPERE 25.00ea 50.00ea 75.00ea Where multiple disconnects are grouped at a single location and are supplied by a single set of supply conductors the cumulative rating of the overcurrent devices shall be used to determine the supply ampere capacity. CIRCUITS, FEEDERS, FEEDER TAPS, OR SETS OF TRANSFORMER SECONDARY CONDUCTORS. 0 TO 200 AMPERE ABOVE 200 AMPERE S.00ea l 0.00ea SPECIAL INSPECTIONS For inspections not covered, or for requested special inspections or services, the fee shall be $30 per hour, including travel time, plus 31 cents per mile traveled, plus reasonable cost of equipment or material consumed. OTHER FEES Any fees not listed in this fee schedule shall be per the most recent State fee schedule. c:\mpl\mplwfees.doc pg 1 MORE ON REVERSE SIRE 9 PERMIT APPLICATION INFORMATION ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS: Use a "State Form" HOMEOWNERS: Use "State Form" (available at the city offices). Add .50 cents for State sur- charge to the total permit fee Make check payable to the City of Maplewood. Mail the check and white and pink copies to the municipality. CIRCUIT CHARGE INFORMATION The fees for circuits are charged for each new circuit installed, for each existing circuit that is added to or extended, and for each existing circuit split, altered. or repaired. In the case of service replacement, there is no charge for circuits that are simply disconnected from the old service panel and re- connected to the new service panel in the same location. UM FEE INFORMATION The minimum fee is for one inspection only where the circuit charges do not satisfy the minimum fee of $20:00. Example Garage wiring that will not be covered upon completion and not more than four 0- 200amp circuits. Three 0- 200amp circuits x $5.00ea = $15.00, notice that the $15.00 figure does not satisfy the $20.00 per inspection minimum. The permit fee would be $20.00 +.50 = $20.50. The minimum fee where a rough -in and final inspection are required is 2 x $20.00 +.50 = $40.50 The minimum fee for service replacement is $25.00 for a 0- 400amp service plus .50 sur charge = 25.50. MAXIMUM FEE INFORMATION The maximum fee of $80.50 for a single family dwelling is for not more than two rough -in inspections and the final inspection. For re- inspections of corrections, or additional inspections, the rate is $20.00 per inspection. WHO CAN DO WIRING IN MINNESOTA? Single family residences that are not 'Tor Sale" and are not rental property may only be wired by a licensed electrical contractor or the homeowner that resides, or intends to reside in the dwelling at the address listed on the permit form. All other occupancies such as duplexes, apartments, condos, any rental property, commercial, industrial, or public property, shall be wired only by a licensed electrical contractor. Any infraction in the above rules will result in invalidation of the permit on file and no permit except from a licensed electrical contractor will be accepted. All permits shall be on file before commencement of the job or a double fee may be issued. 10 e t REQUEST FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTION Minnesota Board of Electricity0-000 t• A4. 1821 University Avenue Suite S -128, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55104 651) 642 -0800 TTY/MRS 1- 800-627 -3529 www. electrr'cityawe mx us Identify the work covered by this request: O NEW 0 REMODEL O ADDITION d REPAIR GENERAL FEES Outdoor 44hdng Standard $1 SERVICES 1 POWER SUPPLIES TrAc Signal Standard @ $5 0 to 400 Ampere @ $25 Suoplementai Fee @ $20 401 to 800 Am $50 Trdsomo s w b 10 KVA $10 Above 800 Ampere @ $75 Transformers over 10 KVA @ $ 20 CIRWTS.1FE,EDERS Transformer! Power Supply for ' ns! Outline . ' $5 - 0 to 200 Ampere @ $5 ONE & 7WO FAMILY.DWELUNGS, EACH UNIT Includes.the Service andfor Poser Supply up to. 500 ArrWes, All Ci=its and Two Inspection Trips Each Dwelling Unit @ $80 Above 200.. 10 ALARM COMMUNICATION, REMOTE CONTROL, SIGNAUNG CIRCUITS, CIRCUITS OF. LESS THAN 50 VOLTS Addis ins Trips @ $20 Each System Device or Apparatus @ $.50 ADDITIONS TO THE GBIERAL FEES Reins 'on Fee $20 MULTIFAMILY CLANGS PER UNIT)TOTAL FEE minimum total fee is $20)3 to 12 Units @ $50 Per Unit Each Additional Unit @ $25 U9 ay 1 hereby certitjr that I inspected the electrical iron described hefdn on the des stame& OTHER ADDITIONAL FEES LightingLighfing Retrofit @ $.25 per Fixture Canter Pivot Irrigation Boom @ $40 Manufacwred Home Park tots @ $25 Recreational Vehicle Park Sites $5 w ` ecarate Bonding insoection @ $20 Sped-al I nsaecdon $30 w Hour r Speciii a.aF.JrOn @ S.31 per Mile THIS INSTALLATION MAY BE ORDERED DISCONNECTED iF NOT COMPLETED WITHIN 18 MONTHS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 13AR CODE i r. iOi A -13 7111 2000 BOARD OF ELECTMI Y COPY INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK OF YELLOW COPY I 11 Rough -in Inspection Required? U Yes U No Inspection Other Than Rough-ln: GReady Now U Will Call j You m=W ire ftpe=r when madyi 'Date Ready: ! I certify that I am te Z UiCL'NSED CONTRACTOR = COMPANY = OWNER and hereby request inspection of the electrical wont at Attachment 2 ELECTRICAL FEES RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Maplewood has adopted the Minnesota State Board of Electricity Rules by reference, except the fees. WHEREAS, the State Board of Electricity recently enacted a new fee schedule. WHEREAS, the Section 9 -234 of the city code says that the city will set the fees for electrical permits and inspections by city council resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that Maplewood amends its fee schedule for electrical permits and inspections so that it conforms with the State Board of Electricity fee schedule. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 2000. 12 AGENDA NO. K z TO: Acting City Manager AGENDA REPORT FROM: Finance Director RE: Public Safety Dispatching Costs DATE: July 10, 2000 Anion by Council Date Endorsed Modified Rejected Effective 1 -1 -99 Ramsey County became responsible for public safety dispatching services in Maplewood. Public safety dispatching costs have decreased as a result. In 1998 these costs were $379,086 and in 1999 they decreased by 48% to $198,357. This was a savings of $180,729. Additional savings will be realized this year as the budget for dispatching is $183,620. If the dispatching contract with Ramsey County is canceled and the City of Maplewood re- activates its dispatching center, the annual operating costs will depend primarily on the staffing level. The attachment compares the 2000 Budget for dispatching with three options that have costs ranging from $431,340 to $523,120. It is important to note that these projections are based on pay rates for this year and the projected costs will need to- be- increassed for pay rates that are negotiated for 2001. Property taxes would need to be increased by 3.3% to 4.5% to finance these options. In addition to the increase in annual operating costs, there will be capital outlay costs to replace the current equipment because it is no longer possible to purchase replacement parts. This cost is estimated at $300,000. It is important to note that the latest preliminary estimates for the 2001 Budget indicate that a 15.1 %tax levy increase will be necessary to finance it. The proposed 2001 Budget is scheduled for delivery to the Council on August 10. PAF1NANCE \WP\AGN \D1SPAT2.WPD DISPATCHING SERVICES - EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES 2000 2000 1997 1998 1999 2000 OPTION 3 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET EXPENDITURES: 494,060 Commodities 0 8 8 9 Personal Services 401,480 412,611 20,670 0 Commodities 2 1 81 0 Contractual Services 33,476 25,146 179,640 183,620 Capital Outlay 508 6 0 0 Total 437,948 445,281 200,391 183 REVENUES: ASSUMPTIONS FOR OPTIONS 1, 2, 3 Dispatching Contracts 53,026 48,645 1 0 State 911 Aid 14,371 17,550 534 0 Total 67,397 66 2,034 0 NET COST 370,551 379,086 198,357 183,620 2000 2000 2000 2000 BUDGET OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 EXPENDITURES: Personal Services $0 $403,580 413,130 494,060 Commodities 0 8 8 9 Contractual Services 183,620 36,710 36 37 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total 183,620 448,890 458,540 540,670 REVENUES: Dispatching Contracts 0 0 0 0 State 911 Aid 0 17,550 17,550 17,550 Total 0 17 17,550 17 NET COST $183,620 $431n 440,990 523,120 ASSUMPTIONS FOR OPTIONS 1, 2, 3 Personal Services: 1. Assume 2000 pay rates for 12 months. 2. Assume three dispatchers will be hired at the 3 -year pay rate and the rest at the starting pay rate. 3. Option 1 includes 1 sgt., 6 full -time dispatchers, 2 half -time dispatchers. 4. Option 2 includes 1 admin. asst., 8 full -time dispatchers. 5. Option 3 includes 1 admin. asst., 10 full -time dispatchers. Commodities and contractual services - see attached. P:1123R5W\MISC \DISP1 s1r' BUDGRPT2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 01/04/80 16:25 EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT 101 GENERAL FUND 406 DISPATCHING SERVICES 1997 1998 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 THRU DEC) 4010 WAGES /FULL-TIME EMPLOYE 224,712 223,266 10,198 227,180 266,950 318,500 4011 OVERTIME PAY 39,397 38 294 36,150 26,430 32,470 j 4020 WAGES /PART -TIME 27,079 15,534 25 x'25 WAGES /TEMPORARY 6,201 LEAVE BENEFITS 40,080 50,964 4,495 38,120 37,980 45,370 4040 RETIREMENT;'BENEFITS 43,896 52,056 2 49,640 50,380 60 4050 INSURANCE BENEFITS 26,316 26,016 2,969 26,710 31,390 37,450 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 401,480 412 20,670 403,580 413,130 494,060 4160 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 1,714 906 81 4,300 4 4 4170 BOOKS 104 302 300 300 300 4240 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 666 201 4 4,000 5,000 TOTAL COMMODITIES 2,484 1,409 81 8 8,600 9,600 4310 TELEPHONE 1,318 118 153- 4390 TRAVEL & TRAINING 887 231 800 900 1,100 4430 REPAIR & MAINT /EQUIPMEN 1,140 397 1,450-6,960 6,960 6,960 x440 REPAIR & MAINT /RADIO 1,408 1,100 936 1,140 1,140 1,140 480 FEES FOR SERVICE 4,647 3,675 178,665 183,620 3,810 3 3 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVI 9,400 5 177,998 183,620 12,710 12,810 13,010 530 EQUIPMENT OFFICE 6,115 4640 EQUIPMENT - OTHER 508 CAPITAL OUTLAY & DEPRE 508 6,115 DEPT /DIV TOTALS 413 425,656 198,749 183 424,890 434,540 5160670 BUDGRPT2 01/04/80 16:30 207 ENCHANCED 911 SERVICE FUND 406 DISPATCHING SERVICES 1997 ACTUAL 4310 TELEPHONE 18 4430 REPAIR & MAINT /EQUIPMEN 5,118 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVI 24 DEPT /D.IV TOTALS 24,076 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EXPENDITURES BY ACCOUNT 1998 1999 ACTUAL ACTUAL THRU DEC) 19,625 1,642 19,625 1,642 19,625 1,642 2000 2000 2000 2000 BUDGET OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 24 24 24,000 24 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 PAGE 1 City of Maplewood Name (first &last) - please print Address 1. q DuL: r 57- v 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Official Sign -Up Sheet By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes. If r C t I t. FAA f LAX TV A a piq I - .-.- - - - . -.- -I.. -.. - --. . --.- . I.- ... I.- ........ . .... - A. C. YG . 1"' Cam. Y! h _ i/' / i {. e J fa1.+ S s ion 400 ss