HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 07-10 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, July 10, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -14
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Council/Manager Workshop Meeting (June 26, 2000)
2. Minutes of Meeting 00 -13 (June 26, 2000)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted
by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the
Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Community Development Staffing Request
3. HRC Resignation
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse (1820 Van Dyke Street)
A. Conditional Use Permit
B. Design Approval
2. 7:10 P.M. Amusement City Conditional Use Permit Revision (1870 Rice Street)
3. 7:20 P.M. Highpoint Ridge (County Road D and Highway 61)
A. Comprehensive Plan Changes:
1. R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light
manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density)
2. Drop planned minor collector street.
B. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
C. Preliminary Plat
D. No Parking for One Side of Private Streets and Driveways
a
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Bituminous Seal Coating, Project 00 -07
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. LBC Zoning District Regulations Code Amendment (Second Reading)
K. NEW BUSINESS
None
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for
this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make
arrangements. Assistant Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
D1
City of Maplewood
CITY COUNCIL /MANAGER WORKSHOP
Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 26, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
6:30 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Cardinal at 6:30 p.m.
B. ROLL CALL
Mayor Robert Cardinal
Present
Councilmember Sherry Allenspach
Present
Councilmember Kenneth Collins
Present
Councilmember Marvin Koppen
Present
Councilmember Julie Wasiluk
Present
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the agenda as presented. The motion was
seconded by Councilmember Allenspach. The motion passed 5 -0.
D. PERSONNEL DECISIONS INTERNATIONAL
Acting City Manager Haider said that there was information distributed to the council
-- regarding the selection process for the new city manager. Pat Crowns, from Personnel
Decisions International, was present at the meeting. Ms. Crowns discussed the ratification
of the position profile and supplementary questions to send along with the profile. Mayor
Cardinal said the council would get back to Ms. Crowns with any changes they might
have.
E. COMMUNITY SURVEY
Acting City Manager Haider asked the council if they would want to do another
Community Survey which was last done in 1995. Staff will give the councilmembers a
copy of the 1995 survey and find out what the cost would be to do a new survey.
F. OTHER BUSINESS
None
G. FUTURE TOPICS
Mall Area Development Options
Acting City Manager Haider had asked a consultant to come and give an alternative to the
direction the city is headed in with the Mall area. The consultant could not make the
meeting tonight but will come on July 10, 2000 instead.
H. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Councilmember Allenspach moved and Councilmember
Wasiluk seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:50 pm.
02-
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, June 26, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -13
A. CALL TO ORDER:
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers,
Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
C. ROLL CALL:
19
Robert Cardinal, Mayor
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 00 -11 (June 8, 2000) as
presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Allenspach, Koppen, Wasiluk
Abstain - Councilmember Collins
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Council /Manager Workshop (June 12,
2000) as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins
Ayes - all
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 00 -12 (June 12, 2000) as
presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach
Ayes - all
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the Agenda as amended.
L 1. Visitor Presentations - Funeral Arrangements
M1. Budget Matter - Cleanup and Litter
M2. Overnight Parking
1
M3. Councilmembers Preferred Way of Communication
M4. Cable Council Meetings Cutoff
M5. Events Update
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS:
1. Human Relations Commission Appointments
Acting City Manager Haider stated that there were three openings on the Human Relations
Commission. The Council has interviewed two candidates. The council was asked to appoint
EE mo Mattox and Rita Ander to the Human Relations Commission.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the appointments of Elmo Mattox and Rita Ander to the
Human Relations Commission.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
G. CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
1. Approval of Claims
Approved the claims.
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$25.00 Checks #8316 dated 6 -5 -00
$188,647.13 Checks #50039 thru #50157 dated 6 -13 -00
$ Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 6 -6 thru 6 -12 -00
$35,074.27 Checks #8317 thru #8319 dated 6 -12 thru 6 -14 -00
$95,859.07 Checks #50160 thru #50299 dated 6 -20 -00
$123 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 6 -13 thru 6 -19 -00
$630,314.59 Total Accounts Payable
2
PAYROLL
$311,322.16 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 6 -9 -00
$24,287.76 Payroll Deduction check #78877 thru #78884 dated 6 -9 -00
$335 Total Payroll
$965,924.51 GRAND TOTAL
2. Transfer to Close Fund for Birmingham Street Storm Sewer Project
Closed project, approved a transfer from the Street Construction State Aid Fund to finance the
deficit and authorized the appropriate budget changes.
3. Transfer to Close Fund for Roselawn/Desoto Storm Sewer Project
Canceled project and approved a transfer from the General Fund to finance the costs incurred.
The 2000 budget amount for transfers of this type is $30,000.
4. Transfer to Close Fund for English Street -Frost to Highway 36 Project
Canceled project and approved a transfer from the General Fund to finance the costs incurred.
The 2000 budget amount for transfers of this type is $30,000.
5. Transfer to Close Fund for Van Dyke Street Bituminous Overlay Project
Canceled project and approved a transfer from the Street Construction State Aid Fund to finance
the deficit and authorize the appropriate budget changes.
6. MSA Contract Amendment - Non Union Range Adjustment
Approved change in the Public Works Coordinator salary range and MSA agreement and
authorized the Finance Director to make the appropriate budget adjustments to be effective on
June 12, 2000.
7. Office Depot Assignment and Assumption of Agreement
Approved the agreement and authorized appropriate city officials to execute the document.
8. Goff s Mapleview Fifth Addition Preliminary Plat Time Extension (Duluth Street)
Approved a one -year time extension for Goff s Mapleview Fifth Addition preliminary plat
subject to the April 26, 1993 conditions for the Maplewview Fourth Addition preliminary plat.
3
9. Goff s Knollwood Circle Preliminary Plat Time Extension (Cypress Street)
Approved a one -year time extension for the Knollwood Circle preliminary plat sub j ect to the July
12 1999 conditions of approval.
10. George's Auto Body Conditional Use Permit Review (1225 Frost Avenue)
Approved review of conditional use permit for 1225 Frost Avenue again in five years.
1 1. Radio Interference Filters
Authorized the initial expenditure of $1,125.00 for the purchase of 500 filters. This expenditure
will be re- cooped as the filters are purchased by residents over time.
12. Change Order #2 for Maplewood Community Center Fitness Expansion Construction
Approved Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $ 15,634 and authorized the finance director to
make the necessary adjustments from the P.A.C. funds to cover the cost of the change orders.
13. Joint Powers Agreement with White Bear Township for Management of Bellaire Beach
Approved the joint powers agreement between the Township of White Bear and the City of
Maplewood regarding the lifeguard services for Bellaire Beach.
14. AF S CME Contract Amendment
Approved AF S CME Contract Amendment.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 7:00 P.M. (7:10) LB Zoning District Regulations Code Amendment (First Reading)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Acting. City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Milo Thompson presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Candy Carlson, Administrator /Controller at Tillges
Wade Halstrom, Lab Manager at Tillges
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the first reading of the following ordinance amending
the permitted uses in the Limited Business Commercial District requirements:
ORDINANCE NO. 802
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PERMITTED USES IN THE
LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
Section 1. This section changes Sections 36 -154 as follows (additions are underlined and
deletions are crossed out):
Section 36- 154(a) Permitted Uses. Offices, medical or health- related clinics and day care
centers. The city will allow uses similar to the above if they would not create a nuisance and if
they are not noxious or hazardous. The city council shall review uses that are not clearly similar
for a determination of compatibility.
Section 36- 154(b) Reserved.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
I. AWARD OF BIDS
None
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Good Samaritan Parking Request
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the
report.
5
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Good Samaritan request to install a parking lane
on Roselawn Avenue, and establish a `NO PARKING 10:00 PM TO 8:00 AM' zone at that
location.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
2. Park Land Donation from John Vitale
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
b. Director of Parks and Recreation Anderson presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to accept the property from Mr. Vitale and to have the Finance
Director make the necessary budget modifications from the contingency fund to cover the cost of
a formal appraisal for the property
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
L, VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Funeral Arrangements - City Attorney Fawcett said there will be a memorial ceremony
scheduled for June 30, 2000 through July 3, 2000. City Attorney Fawcett said that in
proceedings such as this where an interpreter is requested, the city is mandated to provide for that
interpreting: Ong Lo, from the City Attorney's office, was present to interpret. Mouala
Mouachuepao representing the Metro Funeral Home, and Sao Moua, son of Colonel Cher Pao
Moua, spoke before the council. Mr. Sao Moua asked the city's help to provide 24 -hour police
presence in the area and to allow more parking spaces on the street.
Police Chief Winger said that the city would provide the best policing for the event as it can,
stating that having additional parking at Aldrich Arena, with a shuttle, would certainly ease the
complaints from the neighbors. Winger said that the city would like to keep parking off the
street unless it is absolutely necessary. Winger said he didn't know at this time if the city could
dedicate,,;a police officer or squad car at the event for 24 hours per day but the police would be
there when necessary and there will be command officers and supervisors available all weekend
to monitor.
Fire Chief Lukin said that staff s main concern would be the number of occupants in the funeral
home at any given time. He said the occupancy rating for the funeral home is approximately 350
people. It was staff s recommendation to try and stage as many people as possible outside and
provide the best possible way of allowing only those numbers in at a specific time.
0
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Budget Matter - Cleanup and Litter (Adopt-A- Street) - Acting City Manager Haider said the
Public Works Department sweeps all the streets in the Spring and a couple times before the
winter comes. Mr. Haider said that during the summer certain areas that accumulate more litter
than others are swept on a regular basis. Mr. Haider said that having an Adopt -A- Street program
in Maplewood would be difficult because the vast majority of the streets in Maplewood are in
residential areas which can get congested and could pose safety problems for those volunteers
picking up the litter.
2. Overnight Parking - Acting City Manager Haider said that the Overnight Parking Ordinance
states that between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. you cannot park more than two hours in
the same spot. Mr. Haider said that this is difficult to enforce. Staff is requesting the council to
authorize staff to prepare an ordinance amendment that would prohibit parking from 2:00 a.m. to
6:00 a.m. period.
3. Councilmembers Preferred Way of Communication -Mayor Cardinal indicated his desire to
include his and the councilmembers phone numbers and e -mail addresses (if applicable) in the
Maplewood in Motion newsletter.
4. Cable Council Meetings Cutoff - Mayor Cardinal said that some of the broadcasted council
meetings were cut off at the end of the meeting and apologized to the people of Maplewood.
Corrections have been made so that this shouldn't happen again.
S. Events Update - Councilmember Allenspach announced when the parks will be hosting the
Midsummer Nights. Mayor Cardinal said that the July 4th Celebration would be at Hazelwood
Park again this year beginning at 5:00 p.m. and all events are free.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None
O. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Allenspach moved to adi ourn the meeting at 8:16 P.M.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
Karen E. Guilfoile, City Clerk
VA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director /4 J>���
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: June 3 0, 2000
AGENDA NO. G -1
Action by Council
Date -
]Endorsed
Modified
R eected.....- ---- --
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$2,948.64
$166,822.98
$2,746,296.30
$37,411.00
$435
$6
Checks #8320 thru #8321 dated 6 -16 -00
Checks #50302 thru #50402 dated 6 -27 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 6 -20 thru 6 -26 -00
Checks #8322 thru #8330 dated 6 -26 thru 6 -29 -00
Checks #50405 thru #50487 dated 7 -3 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 6 -27 thru 7-3-00
$9,431,408.32 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$315,321.86 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 6 -23 -00
$23,305.82 Payroll Deduction check #79056 thru #79061 dated 6 -23 -00
$338,627.68 Total Payroll
$9,770,036.00 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions
on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if
necessary.
hu
Attachments
C:\ OFFICE \WP_DOCSWGENDA\APCL0030.JUN
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1
06/23/00 08:24 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
8320
06/16/00
720600
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE JOY CLEAN UP
49.29
49.29
8321
06/16/00
541440
MINN. STATE TREASURER STAX
MONTHLY SURTAX - MAY 2000
2
MONTHLY SURTAX - MAY 2000
59.20-
MONTHLY SURTAX - MAY 2000
1.00-
2,899.35
50302
06/27/00
SCOTT & MARY LECY -HO
REF - GRADING 900 E. CTY RD C
1
REF - GRADING 900 E. CTY RD C
4.38
1,004.38
50303
06/27/00
JUDY NORTHOUSE
REFUND - FIREFLY MAGIC
6.00
6.00
50304
06/27/00
JAMIE SEVERSON
REFUND - ROOM RENTAL
250.00
250.00
50305
06/27/00
BEST BUY
REFUND - DUP PAY FOR FEB2000
50.00
50.00
50306
06/27/00
CARL ANDERSON
REFUND = 00005963
432.82
432.82
50307
06/27/00
HEALTH PARTNERS
REFUND - 00003300 L STOCKTON
217.80
REFUND - 00006896 A ERSBO
447.49
665.29
50308
06/27/00
ALLIED MEDICAL ACCTS CONTROL
PAYMENT DUE ON CONTRACT
196.95
196.95
50309
06/27/00
JILL BOROS
REFUND - T BALL
40.00
40.00
50310
06/27/00
PATRICA LEMAY
REFUND - SOFTBALL
40.00
40.00
50311
06/27/00
TERESA LEVERETT
REFUND - DAYTIME T -BALL
30.00
30.00
50312
06/27/00
010475
AWD COOLERS
WATER COOLER - MAY 2000
319.02
319.02
50313
06/27/00
010575
ACE HARDWARE
CLAMP /PLUG /PAINT
5.64
MISC SUPPLIES
7.76
MISC SUPPLIES
6.34
19.74
50314
06/27/00
..020411
VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEVUE
CELLULAR PHONE
74.76
74.76
50315
06/27/00
020810
MARK ALDRIDGE
LUNCH AT SCHOOL 6 -6 TO 6-8
22.67
22.67
50316
06/27/00
030730
ANOKA HENNEPIN TECH COLLEGE
VENTILATION SCHOOL
450.00
450.00
50317
06/27/00
060080
BBW WINGS
CHICKEN WINGS
279.56
279.56
50318
06/27/00
061100
BANNIGAN & KELLY P.A.
LEGAL SERVICES - MAY 2000
8,034.44
8,034.44
50319
06/27/00
061700
BATTERIES PLUS
12 LANTERN BATTERIES /CASE
44.73
CELL PHONE BATTERIES
87.31
132.04
50320
06/27/00
080925
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
MONTHLY WATER UTIL - 6/15/00
84.60
MONTHLY WATER UTIL - 6/15/00
28.80
MONTHLY WATER UTIL - 6/15/00
229.47
MONTHLY WATER UTIL - 6/15/00
1,025.91
1,368.78
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 2
06/23/00
08:24
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER /
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
50321
06/27/00
081220
RICK BOWMAN
NON- UNIFORM CLOTHING
230.53
230.53
50322
06/27/00
091660
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.
50.96 TONS 3/4 MINUS
307.72
307.72
50323
06/27/00
170230
CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
WATER SERVICE MAY 2000
10.17
CREDIT - DUP PAYMENT FEB 2000
11.20 -
WATER COOLER - JUNE 2000
10.17
9.14
50324
06/27/00
180143
DCT - DURABLE COMPONENT TECH
FLOP DISK 60
129.55
129.55
50325
06/27/00
180390
DADCO FOOD PRODUCTS
MDSE. FOR RESALE
201.00
MDSE. FOR RESALE
80.40
281.40
50326
06/27/00
180800
DALCO
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
349.07
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
285.62
634.69
50327
06/27/00
190400
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE
428.00
428.00
50328
06/27/00
200500
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS
MARKING PAINT
18.18
50# GLASS BEADS
272.64
290.82
50329
06/27/00
210600
THE DRAMA KIDS
HEAD INST - DRAMA CAMP WEEK 1
850.00
850.00
50330
06/27/00
210878
KIRK DUELLMAN
MEALS /LODGING 6/8 TO 6/11
292.93
MILEAGE - CROSBY
133.56
426.49
50331
06/27/00
230900
DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO.
KODAK COPIER - MAY 2000
129.48
KODAK COPIER - MAY 2000
129.48
KODAK COPIER - MAY 2000
4.26
KODAK COPIER - MAY 2000
167.27
KODAK COPIER - MAY 2000
348.50
KODAK COPIER - MAY 2000
309.73
KODAK COPIER - MAY 2000
73.85
KODAK COPIER - MAY 2000
142.46
KODAK COPIER - MAY 2000
346.37
KODAK COPIER - MAY 2000
286.86
1 1 938.26
50332
06/27/00
234475
ELECTRIC PUMP WALDOR GROUP
RENTAL PUMP
275.00
RENTAL PUMP
225.00
500.00
50333
06/27/00
260290
FARMER BROS. CO.
MDSE. FOR RESALE
266.26
266.26
50334
06/27/00
270250
TIMOTHY W FLOR
LUNCH AT FTO SCHOOL
29.65
29.65
50335
06/27/00
300500
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
93.33
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
40.79
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
25.58
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
10.61
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
44.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
48.57
2
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 3
06/23/00
08:24
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
138.27
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
108.33
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
55.79
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
25.58
596.44
50336
06/27/00
300550
GE CAPITAL
KODAK LEASE JUNE 2000
35.29
KODAK LEASE JUNE 2000
35.29
KODAK LEASE JUNE 2000
1.26
KODAK LEASE JUNE 2000
45.59
KODAK LEASE JUNE 2000
94.99
KODAK LEASE JUNE 2000
84.23
KODAK LEASE JUNE 2000
20.13
KODAK LEASE JUNE 2000
38.83
KODAK LEASE JUNE 2000
94.42
KODAK LEASE JUNE 2000
78.29
528.32
50337
06/27/00
310710
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.
MAY 00 SERVICE
806.40
806.40
50338
06/27/00
330200
HAMERNICK DECORATING CENTER
SAFETY YELLOW HYDRANT PAINT
313.64
313.64
50339
06/27/00
330374
HARMON AUTOGLASS
REPLACE SIDE MIRROR
26.63
26.63
50340
06/27/00
340110
HEJNY RENTALS, INC
TABLE RENTAL FOR MS 60/30
148.39
148.39
50341
06/27/00
351300
JUDITH HORSNELL
MILEAGE
10.53
10.53
50342
06/27/00
351610
HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY
METER STAT WORK FOR MCES 99 -02
2
2,292.50
50343
06/27/00
370075
HUGO'S TREE CARE
ROBINHOOD PK-REMOVE TREE /STUMP
617.70
617.70
50344
06/27/00
390107
INDEPENDENT SPORTS NETWORK
UMPIRES 6/5 TO 6/19
2
2
50345
06/27/00
390190
INFINITY WIRELESS
16 CHANNEL VHF /REMOTE SPKR MIC
1 1 913.00
16 CHANNEL VHF /REMOTE SPKR MIC
662.68
2,575.68
50346
06/27/00
401670
JOLLY TYME FAVORS
WATER BALLOONS
52.97
52.97
50347
06/27/00
420150
KINKO'S CUSTOMER ADM SERVICES
CUT SURVEY CARDS
1.60
COS SOUTH OFFICE
51.46
RAINWATER NOTICE
35.00
NNO FLIERS
5.00
POSTCARDS FOR JOY CLEAN UP
13.58
106.64
50348
06/27/00
450140
L.T.G. POWER EQUIPMENT
LAWN MOWER WHEEL
17.30
17.30
50349
06/27/00
460452
LEAGUE OF MINN. CITIES
APRIL 2000 TO MARCH 2001
40.00
40.00
50350
06/27/00
460800
LESCO, INC.
ROUNDUP
137.24
137.24
50351
06/27/00
470700
LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS
MIXED BLOOD AD
168.00
EMPLOYMENT AD - P/T CSR
205.00
373.00
3
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 4
06/23/00
08:24
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
50352
06/27/00
480550
LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
OLYMPUS S830
237.50
237.50
50353
06/27/00
500300
M.A. ASSOCIATES
GLASS CLEANER
117.05
GLASS CLEANER
95.78
212.83
50354
06/27/00
501250
MAD SCIENCE OF MINNESOTA
2 WORKSHOPS - ROCKET
238.00
238.00
50355
06/27/00
501567
MAGNETIC CONCEPTS CORP
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
326.41
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
267.08
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
32.44-
561.05
50356
06/27/00
510500
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
BIRTHDAY CAKES
126.00
126.00
50357
06/27/00
511360
CAROL MARTINSON
STRESS MGMT SEMINAR /LUNCH
7.40
7.40
50358
06/27/00
530500
MENARDS
MAILBOX
6.35
6.35
50359
06/27/00
531920
MICHAEL'S STORES INC.
PAINT
18.67
CRAYOLA
7.46
ACRYLIC PAINTS
23.67
49.80
50360
06/27/00
540175
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.
MDSE. FOR RESALE
432.60
432.60
50361
06/27/00
540480
MIKE'S LP GAS & R.V. SERVICE
20# REFILL LP
9.80
9.80
50362
06/27/00
570090
MOGREN BROS.
BLACK DIRT
125.02
BLACK DIRT PROJ 98 -10
63.90
188.92
50363
06/27/00
620550
MUSEUM PRODUCTS CO.
MAGNIFIERS /BUG BOXES
384.93
MAGNIFIERS /BUG BOXES
22.43-
362.50
50364
06/27/00
630180
STEPHEN NALIPINSKI
MEALS /LODGING 6 -8 TO 6 -11
301.28
MILEAGE TO BRAINERD
126.00
427.28
50365
06/27/00
660800
NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF
MONTHLY ELEC UTIL - 5/8 TO 6/9
1,564.49
SEWER 1902PW/1830CH/2100MCC
178.05
SEWER 1902PW/1830CH/2100MCC
223.87
SEWER 1902PW/1830CH/2100MCC
218.29
2
50366
06/27/00
661108
NORTH STAR WIPER & INDUSTRIAL
TOWEL CABINET /TOWELS
77.08
TOWEL CABINET /TOWELS
63.07
140.15
50367
06/27/00
661170
NORTHEAST SUBURBAN TRANSIT
MAPLEWOOD 2000 CONTRIBUTION
41,714.00
41,714.00
50368
06/27/00
690340
OLSON, ARNOLD G
MILEAGE
64.40
PLAN REVIEW & CODE CONSULT
605.00
PLAN REVIEW SERVICES
1
1,819.40
50369
06/27/00
700664
PAGENET
PAGER SERVICE
93.10
93.10
50370
06/27/00
- 700730
MARY KAY PALANK
STRESS MGMT CLASS /LUNCH
7.40
0
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 5
06/23/00
08:24
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
STRESS MGMT CLASS /MILEAGE
9.29
16.69
50371
06/27/00
700735
STEVEN T PALMA
TRAINING
.29.25
29.25
50372
06/27/00
701400
PARTY TIME LIQUOR
16 GAL ROOTBEER FOR 6 -27
70.23
70.23
50373
06/27/00
711690
PIONEER PRESS
EMPLOYMENT AD /CSC PARAMEDIC
262.48
262.48
50374
06/27/00
711698
PIONEER RIM AND WHEEL CO.
GASKET
.82
HYDRAULIC BRA
29.92
MASTER CYL
47.93
78.67
50375
06/27/00
712115
POLAR CHEV, GEO, MAZDA
REPLACE INJ PUMP /WARRANTY
100.00
100.00
50376
06/27/00
712260
POOLSIDE
0- RINGS FOR CIRC PUMP
98.29
O-RINGS FOR CIRC PUMP
80.42
178.71
50377
06/27/00
720755
PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC.
PLANTS
275.84
275.84
50378
06/27/00
722310
PUSH PEDAL PULL
CYBEX EQUIPMENT
12,082.19
CYBEX EQUIPMENT
694.69-
11,387.50
50379
06/27/00
722350
PYRAMID TRIM PRODUCTS INC.
MATERIALS FOR UMBRELLAS
145.24
MATERIALS FOR UMBRELLAS
8.87-
136.37
50380
06/27/00
741201
RAINBOW FOODS
SUPPLIES FOR AEROBICS
30.49
GROCERIES - FIELD TRIP
44.64
75.13
50381
06/27/00
750550
REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS
MDSE. FOR RESALE
379.72
MDSE. FOR RESALE
42.55
MDSE. FOR RESALE
254.48
676.75
50382
06/27/00
770800
RYCO SUPPLY CO.
PAPER TOWELS
26.73
26.73
50383
06/27/00
780300
S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.
COLUMNAR BOOKS
3.88
COLUMNAR BOOKS
3.18
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
106.45
STAPLER /OFFICE SUPPLIES
117.83
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
11.20
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
145.15
STAPLER
89.15
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
136.15
CREDIT MEMO - STAPLER
89.15-
523.84
50384
06/27/00
820207
SIGN- A -RAMA
SIGNAGE FOR BLDG HOURS
242.82
242.82
50385
06/27/00
820300
PROFESSIONAL MASSAGE CENTER
MAY MASSAGES
2,985.50
2
50386
06/27/00
831620
SPRI PRODUCTS, INC.
5 6, 7 LB WTS - DUMBELLS
343.26
5, 6 7 LB WTS - DUMBELLS
17.88-
325.38
5
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6
06/23/00 08:24 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
50387
06/27/00
842200
PAULINE STAPLES
CHICKEN WING SAMPLER 6/20
53.24
53.24
50388
06/27/00
843570
STREAMLINE DESIGN
2 HENLEY /ASSORTED SHIRTS/TEES
1,832.50
XXL /XXXL HENLEY
26.00
1 1 858.50
50389
06/27/00
850668
SUPERIOR FORD
1 - CROWN VICTORIA SQUAD CAR
20,958.00
1 CROWN VICTORIA SQUAD CAR
20,958.00
41,916.00
50390
06/27/00
850674
SUPERIOR SERVICES
MAY 2000 - RECYCLING
16,739.04
16,739.04
50391
06/27/00
850685
SUZANNE'S CUISINE, INC.
SANDWICHES
261.67
SALADS & BARS
224.48
486.15
50392
06/27/00
860410
TSE, INC.
JANITORIAL SRVS 4/20 TO 5/17
669.00
669.00
50393
06/27/00
860650
TARGET STORES -CSA ACCTS REC
SUPPLIES FOR SOUTH OFFICE
40.69
POOL SHUT DOWN /CLEANING SUPPLY
47.71
PHOTOS
7.44
95.84
50394
06/27/00
861611
THE CREATIVE GROUP
MARKETING PROGRAM PAYMENT
1,792.00
1,792.00
50395
06/27/00
880436
TRANSIT SERVICES
TROLLEY ADD HRS
379.50
379.50
50396
06/27/00
880820
TRUGREEN- MAPLEWOOD #4635
CITY HALL /MCC 6-10 -00
948.92
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD- PUBLIC WORKS
755.09
AFTON HEIGHTS PK 6 -9 -00
766.80
2,470.81
50397
06/27/00
890910
US WEST DEX
MCC DIRECTORY - JUNE 2000
103.40
103.40
50398
06/27/00
900100
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
36.45
36.45
50399
06/27/00
911600
VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
GLASSES /RUBBER OVERSHOES
26.06
GLOVES
65.35
91.41
50400
06/27/00
934170
THE WATSON CO INC
MDSE. FOR RESALE
251.91
251.91
50401
06/27/00
943630
WORLD CITIZEN INC
BASIC PEACE SITE KIT
145.00
145.00
50402
06/27/00
960500
XPEDX
PAPER
142.17
PAPER
142.17
PAPER
4.68
PAPER
183.66
PAPER
382.68
PAPER
337.59
PAPER DISCOUNT
44.28-
PAPER
81.09
PAPER
211.26
PAPER
380.33
PAPER
314.99
PAPER
176.49
PAPER
438.78
PAPER DISCOUNT
8.24-
2,743.37
6
TOTAL CHECKS
169,771.62
7
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pa ee
Description
r
06/19/00
06/20/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers. License #697
06/19/00
06/20/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
06/16/00
06/20/00
CBSA
Dental claims
06/20/00
06/21/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
06/20/00
06/21/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
06/16/00
06/21/00
Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items
06/21/00
06/21/00
NISI
Investment purchase
06/21/00
06/22/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
06/21/00
06/22/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
06/07/00
06/22/00
MN Dept of Revenue
Fuel Tax
06/22/00
06/23/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
06/22/00
06/23/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
06/23/00
06/26/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
06/23/00
06/26/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
06/23/00
06/26/00
U.S. Treasurer
Federal Payroll Tax
TOTAL
Amount
974.00
15,771.83
1,879.97
617.00
13,938.13
1,775.82
2, 596, 273.33
711.00
14,191.14
351.00
567.50
13,166.07
712.00
16, 563.24
68,804.27
2, 746, 296.30
E3
VOUCHRE2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
06/30/00
07:51
: VOUCHER /CHECK.REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
8322
06/26/00
330401
HASTINGS BUS COMPANY
COACH BUS
8324
06/26/00
060080
BBW WINGS
BBW
8326
06/27/00
910452
VALLEYFAIR
ADMISSIONS FOR VALLEYFAIR
8327
06/27/00
742155
RAMSEY CTY PROPERTY RECORDS TAXES ON LAND PURCH OPEN SPACE
WASTE MGMT GOODRICH PARK
8328
06/28/00
722200
P.E.R.A.
P/R DEDUCTION REMITTANCE
P/R DEDUCTION REMITTANCE
8329
06/29/00
630018
NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
PERA LIFE INS P/R DED JUNE
MCGUIRE, MIKE
8330
06/29/00
900274
UNITED WAY OF THE ST.
PAUL 2ND QUARTER 2000
ITEM
AMOUNT
255.00
53.25
1,220.00
908.48
40.19
14,880.41
18,835.67
201.00
12.00
1,005.00
TOTAL CHECKS
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 1
06/30/00 08:36
;VOUCHER /CHECK,REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
50405
07/03/00
BLAKE BUILDERS
REF - GRADING 890 STERLING
1
REF - GRADING 890 STERLING
64.79
REF - GRADING 2506 BITTERSWEET
1
REF - GRADING 2506 BITTERSWEET
50.55
REF- GRADING 780 STERLING ST S
1
REF- GRADING 780 STERLING ST S
44.66
REF- GRADING 2427 MATTERHORN
1
REF-GRADING 2427 MATTERHORN
44.66
4,204.66
50406
07/03/00
NAOMI FAMILY'CENTER
REFUND - GROUP
10.00
10.00
50407
07/03/00
ROTHERFORD ADVENTURE CLUB
REFUND - GROUP
73.70
73.70
50408
07/03/00
ROSALYN ROSS
REF - F25238 00004225
260.01
260.01
50409
.07/03/00
DAVID KNUTSON
REFUND - DUP PYMT KNUT0300
25.00
25.00
50410
07/03/00
JUDY FARINELLA
REFUND - 3 MOS
126.48
126.48
50411
07/03/00
010467
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
CELL PHONES
349.39
349.39
50412
07/03/00
020150
VOICE STREAM WIRELESS
CELL PHONE
139.34
139.34
50413
07/03/00
020405
AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL
MEDICAL OXYGEN
132.40
132.40
50414
07/03/00
020407
AIRSPACE USA, INC
MAGIC ISLAND /BLOWER
4,361.70
MAGIC ISLAND /BLOWER
263.90-
4
50415
07/03/00
021250
AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
RAGS
108.63
MATS
36.69
MATS
36.69
182.01
50416
07/03/00
030660
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
PATROL & BOARDING FEES
803.87
803.87
50417
07/03/00
041500
ASPEN MILLS
1 EMS PANTS
49.34
49.34
50418
07/03/00
042600
ASSN. OF TRAIN OFFICERS OF MN
FTO BASIC CERTIFICATION
400.00
FTO BASIC CERTIFICATION
400.00
SUPV FIELD TRNG PROCESS
150.00
950.00
50419
07/03/00
080925
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
1977 MANTON WATER 4/25 TO 6/14
80.99
1977 MANTON METER TURN ON /SET
40.00
120.99
50420
07/03/00
150190
COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONST. CO.
REPAIR STA 14
156.87
156.87
50421
07/03/00
152557
COUNTRY FLAGS
NEW FLAG STATION 7
35.45
35.45
50422
07/03/00
161130
CRAMER BUILDING SERVICES
REPAIR PW A/C UNIT
247.25
247.25
50423
07/03/00
181750
DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING INC
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS PYMT
94,746.93
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS PYMT
4,737.35-
90
10
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 2
06/30/00 08:36
VOUCHER /CHECK
REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
50424
07/03/00
181800
DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO.
CHECK VALVE DISC
446.59
446.59
50425,
07/03/00
190400
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE
814.00
814.00
50426
07/03/00
200830
COLLEEN CALLAHAN
NEIGHBORHOOD MTG - FOOD
71.25
NEIGHBORHOOD MTG - FOOD
90.10
161.35
50427
07/03/00
231525
EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
UPGRADED SOFTWARE
125.00
UPGRADED SOFTWARE
531.25
UPGRADED SOFTWARE
665.51
1,321.76
50428
07/03/00
240375
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
REPAIR TO L1
82.82
REPAIR TO R1
92.77
175.59
50429
07/03/00
260295
FARMERS UNION CO -OP OIL
LP GAS /LABOR
469.38
469.38
50430
07/03/00
300500
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
10.44
MATS
43.35
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
89.06
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
78.33
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
40.79
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
8.50
MATS
27.00
JANITORIAL
21.53
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
25.58
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
11.47
366.43
50431
07/03/00
301070
GALL'S, INC.
CPR MASK
252.24
252.24
50432
07/03/00
320501
GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC.
EMT REPLENISH - CHRISTENSEN
80.00
SHEEP LAB
63.00
143.00
50433
07/03/00
330215
HANDY HITCH & WELDING CO INC
INSTALL HITCH - 942
210.13
210.13
50434
07/03/00
350470
STEVEN HIEBERT
MEALS /LODGING AT TRAINING
160.62
160.62
50435
07/03/00
350700
HIRSHFIELDS
RESPIRATOR
35.67
RESPIRATOR
35.67
71.34
50436
07/03/00
350895
HOLIDAY FLEET
CAR WASHES
6.36
6.36
50437
07/03/00
370075
HUGO'S TREE CARE
TREE TRIMMING
170.40
170.40
50438
07/03/00
370084
STEVE HURLEY
COMPAQ PROLIANT 3000 SERVER
818.92
818.92
50439
07/03/00
380174
ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS
PAINT /XYLENE
71.57
71.57
50440
07/03/00
;410370
KATH COMPANIES
CREDIT - POLY COG BELT
21.41 -
CHEMICALS /POWER SERV DIESEL
124.82
11
V
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
06/30/00 08:36
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
BRAKE CLEANER /ENGINE DEGREASER
5.97
BATTERY /LAMP /CLEANER
40.48
CARGO BAR
29.99
ANTI- FREEZE /FLASHER /STEER FLD
66.00
POWER STEERING FLD /SIGNAL /BEAM
54.53
MINIATURE LAMP
6.00
50441
07/03/00
420150
KINKO'S CUSTOMER ADM SERVICES
POSTERS
25.39
50442
'07/03/00
450120
L.M.C.I.T.
BARTHOLOMEW CLAIM
161.52
50443
07/03/00
450380
LAKELAND TRUCK CENTER, INC.
REPAIR TO M1
11.87
50444
07/03/00
501225
MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT
PARKING BRAKE C.B.L.
149.21
50445
07/03/00
510500
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
BIRTHDAY CAKES
61.00
50446
07/03/00
.511180
MARKO AUTO SERVICE
CHARGE & TEST A/C SYSTEM
374.00
REPLACE A/C HOSE & DRYER /CHRG
461.03
50447
07/03/00
520500
MCGUIRE, MICHAEL
VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
450.00
50448
07/03/00
530500
MENARDS
EXT CORDS /OUTLET /PLUG /PLATE
69.19
WATERING CAN
5.28
CORDS
8.99
50449
07/03/00
531650
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
WASTEWATER - JULY 2000
147
50450
07/03/00
541960
MINNESOTA D.A.R.E., INC.
CAKES - DARE
27.00
50451
07/03/00
542345
MINNESOTA PHOTO
FILM DEVELOPING
18.45
FILM DEVELOPING
33.35
50452
07/03/00
542680
MINUTEMAN PRESS - MAPLEWOOD
CORRECTION NOTICE
43.02
50453
07/03/00
570090
MOGREN BROS.
SOD /DIRT /SEED
323.55
CREDIT - SOD
41.30-
50454
07/03/00
570114
MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE
PROF SERVICES-FIRE SAFETY BOND
6,500.00
50455
07/03/00
620600
MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER
MERCURY BALLASTS
60.25
MERCURY BALLASTS
49.31
50456
07/03/00
630210
NARDINI FIRE EQUIP. CO., INC.
RECHARGE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS
102.00
50457
07/03/00
630665
NAT'L FIRE PROTECTION ASSN.
FIRE ALARM HANDBOOK
79.25
50458
07/03/00
660900
NORTH STAR TURF, INC.
WING ARM /SWITCH KIT /ROD ENDS
849.05
WHEEL -JAC
95.59
50459
07/03/00
661600
NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO.
POWER WASHER
1,235.39
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
306.38
25.39
161.52
11.87
149.21
61.00
835.03
450.00
83.46
147,032.00
27.00
51.80
43.02
282.25
6,500.00
109.56
102.00
79.25
944.64
1,235.39
i
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
06/30/00 08 :36
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
50460
07/03/00
661870
MIKE NOVAK
SAFETY BOOTS
50461
07/03/00
691160
ON SITE SANITATION
HAZELWOOD PARK
50462
07/03/00
721185
PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC
LINE ACCESS CHARGES - MAY
LINE ACCESS CHARGES - MAY
LINE ACCESS CHARGE - JUN /JUL
LINE ACCESS CHARGE - JUN /JUL
50463
07/03/00
721190
PRORIDER, INC.
HELMETS FOR NIGHT -OUT
50464
07/03/00
741150
RAH SPORTS
SWIMSUITS
50465
07/03/00
742760
RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING CO INC
CANINE SUPPLIES
CANINE SUPPLIES
MINI TUG /POLICE LEAD
MINI TUG /POLICE LEAD
NYLON TRACKING HARNESS
NYLON TRACKING HARNESS
50466
07/03/00
761200
ROAD RESCUE, INC.
REPLACE FROM AMB FIRE
50467'
07/03/00
762210
- ROTO- ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY
CLEAN OUT DRAIN STAT 1
50468
07/03/00
770802
RYDER BUS COMPANY
BUS FEE
50469
07/03/00
.780350
S.E.H.
EVP MCKNIGHT /PROJ 98 -09
50470
07/03/00
780440
JAMES SACKETT
EMT NATL REGISTRY WRITTEN FEE
50471
07/03/00
780600
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
CANDY /FORKS /PLATES /CUPS
TENT FOR NNO
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
MDSE. FOR RESALE
SNACKS /OFFICE SUPPLIES
MDSE. FOR RESALE
BAGS /CANDY /SNACKS
SNACKS /CANDY /BATTERIES /WATER
MOPS/AIR HOSE /GUMMICRAWLERS
CANDY /SNACKS
MDSE. FOR RESALE
SNACKS /CANOPY /FILM /OFFICE SUPP
SNACKS /CANOPY /FILM /OFFICE SUPP
SNACKS /CANOPY /FILM /OFFICE SUPP
SNACKS /CANOPY /FILM /OFFICE SUPP
MEMBERSHIP - LUKIN
50472
07/03/00
800450
SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL & ENG
PROJ 96048 /DUMP /PHASE II EVAL
50473
07/03/00
830240
SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEMS
SURVEYING EQUIPMENT
FLAGGING /MARKERS /FLD BOOK /LATH
ITEM
AMOUNT
45.00
478.90
50.00
50.00
100.00
100.00
711.50
434.85
334.10
20.40-
57.41
3.51-
70.19
4.29-
2,815.00
299.95
235.00
232.55
50.00
46.25
212.98
318.68
276.69
120.79
118.13
77.49
366.25
108.27
108.00
259.43
212.98
340.37
57.55
22.28
15.00
1,423.63
690.12
145.40
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
45.00
478.90
300.00
711.50
434.85
433.50
2,815.00
299.95
235.00
232.55
50.00
2,661.14
1,423.63
13
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5
06/30/00 08:36 VOUCHER /CHECK.REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
SURVEY FLAGS
52.15
887.67
50474
07/03/00
831610
SPRINGSTED
SRVS ISSUE OF FIRE SAFETY BOND
19,601.32
19,601.32
50475
07/03/00
840403
S% PAUL, CITY OF
STREET-WATER/HYDRANT JAN-MAR
746.94
STREET- WATER /HYDRANT JAN-MAR
255.60
K -9 BASIC HANDLER'S SCH
2,000.00
FTO INST & CERT
1,600.00
OFFICER SURVIVAL SCH
3,100.00
7,702.54
50476
07/03/00
842200
PAULINE STAPLES
CITY PICNIC - PRIZES /CUPS /SPOONS
99.18
99.18
50477
07/03/00
843575
STREICHER'S
TRAINING AMMUNITION
1 1 772.55
1,772.55
50478
07/03/00
850600
SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
FILM
17.26
17.26
50479
07/03/00
860080
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
PROJ 99 -07 /MONTHLY PAYMENT
127,398.21
PROJ 99 -07 /MONTHLY PAYMENT
6,369.91 -
BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
5,195.26
126,223.56
50480
07/03/00
861666
THE METAL DOCTOR
FAB, PAINT & INST 21" SPILL SH
683.00
683.00
50481
07/03/00
880501
TREADWAY'GRAPHICS
PENS /DARENS /MUG /BUTTONS /STICKS
293.63
293.63
50482
07/03/00
882830
TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVE
DUP PAYMENT - INV 48652
127.80 -
TOW STOLEN VEH
90.53
TOW FORFEITURE VEH
63.90
26.63
50483
07/03/00
900250
UNITED SUPPLY CORPORATION
PER -1516
201.29
201.29
50484
07/03/00
900390
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
REGISTRATION FEE - 2 COURSES
590.00
590.00
50485
07/03/00
931300
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
476.00
PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
595.00
PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
595.00-
476.00
50486
07/03/00
931851
WASHINGTON COUNTY ATTORNEY
ADMIN FEE FOR DWI FORFEITURE
100.00
100.00
50487
07/03/00
940500
WEBER & TROSETH INC.
REFILL SQD EXTINGUISHERS
95.30
95.30
TOTAL CHECKS
435,015.54
14
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Pa
Description
06/26/00
06/27/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
06/26/00
06/27/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
06/23/00
06/27/00
CBSA
Dental claims
06/23/00
06/27/00
MN State Treasurer
State Payroll Tax
06/27/00
06/28/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
06/27/00
06/28/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
06/23/00
06/28/00
Elan Financial Services Purchasin g card items
06/28/00
06/29/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
06/28/00
06/29/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
- .0.6/29/00
:06/29/00
NISI
Investment purchase
06/29/00
06/29/00
Smith Barney
Investment purchase
06/26/00
06/30/00
WI Dept of Revenue
State Payroll Tax
06/29/00
06/30/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
06/29/00
06/30/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
06/30/00
07/03/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
06/30/00
07/03/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
TOTAL
Amount
824.00
21,236.79
910.32
12, 879.24
880.50
12,715.93
2
588.25
14,575.77
2
3
1,155.74
694.50
14,907.35
629.00
17,911.27
6, 042, 913.86
15
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
ALLENSPACH , SHERRY
3 3 9.2 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
ALDRI DGE , MARK
19 3 6.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
BOHL , JOHN C
2 3 2 7.18
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
FLOR,TIMOTHY
2464944
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
FRASER,JOHN
2400911
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
TAYLOR,KATHERINE
219978
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J r
2121o80
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
PALMA , STEVEN
2666o 31
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
JOHNSON , KEVIN
217 8.91
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
HELLE , KERRY
2 0 6 6.9 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
ANDREWS , SCOTT A
2206953
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
HASSENSTAB, DENISE R
59.4 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
HI EBERT , STEVEN
2 4 0 7.91
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DUNN ALICE
•
2 2 0 3.5 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
CORNER,AMY L
194.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
MOREHEAD,JESSICA R
8,80
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
BELDE I STANLEY
2363.79
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
RENSLOW, RITA
2 3 5.7 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
BAKKE , LONN A
18 9 4.4 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
BOWMAN ,RICK A
2'026o43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
KOPPEN, MARVIN
3 3 9 .. 2 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
PEKE, :GARY N
2160.04
DIRECT DEPOSIT
D6/23
HEINZ , STEPTIEN J
2 05 6.9 8
DIRECT _DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06123
I3ERBEAT,.�tI ,J
21.38..2.1
�DIRECTDEPOSIT'
06 23 / 00
ETO KTO1+�,.D �� T
2*02 6.43
16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
CHECK DATE
—
DIRECTDEPOSIT
--- - - - - --
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
1523923
BREHEIM,ROGER W
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
1520.22
THIENES,PAUL
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
1745.23
CARLSON,THERESE
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
3141.92
FAUST ,DANIEL F
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
2305.89
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23J00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
061 23/,OD
DiiZECT DEPOSIT
O'bJ23J00
DIRECT .DEPOSIT
06123,100
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIREL"TDEPOSTT
0623/00
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
ROSSMAN,DAVID A
2290.87
HALWEG,KEVIN R
2794.01
JUNG,STEPHANIE J
1523.23
MARUSKA,ERICA
80.10
OLSON,JULIE S
1523923
BREHEIM,ROGER W
1573.63
LARSON,DANIEL J
1520.22
THIENES,PAUL
2508.07
CALLAHAN,COLLEEN J
1745.23
CARLSON,THERESE
1754930
LE,SHERYL
3141.92
FAUST ,DANIEL F
3 4 0 3.12
BAUMAN,GAYLE L
2305.89
KELSEY,CONNIE L 654923
GUILFOILE,KAREN E 2004.79
POWELL,PHILIP 1698.26
WINGER,DONALD S 3322937
BANICK,JOHN J
2614.55
KARIS,FLINT D
2288.03
KVAM,DAVID
2529.32
RABBETT , KEVIN
2676.53
.STEFFEN SCOTT Z
24,81-1015
HOMALLA, "DATID J
2 614.55
BERGERON, JOSEPH A 22 8 8 e 0 3
OERVAI+S -,JR:, :. ARENCE N 2980089
17
EE?]
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
LUKIN, STEVEN J
2579.94
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
RAIDER, KENNETH G
415 3.12
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
PRI EFER, WILLIAM
1875923
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
K;ANE,MICHAEL R
2135.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
LUNDSTEN,LANCE
2374.77
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M
2465983
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
ANDERSON,BRUCE
3059951
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
MARUSKA, MARK A
213 5.2 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
HUTCHINSON , ANN E
17 8 0.0 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
COLEMAN , MELINDA
3079913
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
GRAF , MICHAEL
1211o23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
ROBBINS AUDRA L
12 7 2.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
ATKINS , KATHERINE
1149963
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
CROSSON, LINDA
18 4 9.2 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
EASTMAN . THOMAS E
213 0.8 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
STAPLES,PAULINE
2400.31
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
SCHLINGMAN,PAUL
1826.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
HURLEY , STEPHEN
2 2 4 7.0 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
S Z C Z EPANSKI , THOMAS J
2291972
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
WEN Z EL , JAY B
1337963
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DOBLAR , RI CHARD N
12 44.8.3
?DIRECT DEPOSIT
06:/23 /00
COLLINS f NENNETH V
339.27
DIRECT DEPOSIT
061
- CAMPBELL, CRAIG D
12 4 4. B 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRE CT DEPOSIT
0612310D
D RQBEAT .J
,243.93
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
= CKSON , KYLE F
638.43
EE?]
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
WEAVER, KRISTINE A
1059.09
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
HAWKINS ,LISA A
14 3.4 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
KOEHNEN AMY
,
36.50
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A
4180.37
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
TRONNES,JOHN E
1244.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
OSTER,ANDREA J
1508.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
ol
URBANSKI , HOLLY S
12 9 8.4 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
ANDERSON , CAROLE J
7 6 8.8 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
JACKSON , MARY L
1485963
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
TET ZLAFF , JUDY A
13 4 0.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
CASARE Z, GINA
6 5 4.17
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
I CKES SHERI
,
1310.24
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
CARLE JEANETTE E
14 5 8.7 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
JAGOE CAROL
,
1433.37
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
OLSON,SANDRA
961.20
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
CORCORAN,THERESA M
1343.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
MARTINSON , CAROL F
1725976
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
EVERSON , PAUL
16 3 7.6 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
PARSONS , KURT G
1416.4 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
SPANGLER, EDNA E
418.2 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06123/00
ZWIEG aSUBM Co
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DeBILZAN, THOMAS C
3.199.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
EDGE,DOUGLAS
1853.92
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
061231
LUT.Z , DAVID P
2912 , 9 0
DMECTDEPOSIT
06/23/00
MEYER GERALD W
1639..23
19
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
CHECK DATE
DIltECTDEPOSIT
— --- - - - - --
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
1031.96
HORSNELL,JUDITH A
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
872921
HORWATH „ RONALD J
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
DIRECTDEPOSTT
06/.23/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23J0�
DIRECT D£POSIT
06/23/DD
DIl2ECTDEPOSIT
DIlZECTDEPOSTT
06/23/00
EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
NAGEL,BRYAN 1564.63
OSWALD,ERICK D 1561.63
THOMAS— JR,STEVEN
1542.03
DUCHARME,JOHN
1824.05
PECK,DENNIS L
1928.03
PRIEBE,WILLIAM
2581.28
DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M"
773.63
SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES
1561.63
GREW— HAYMAN,JANET M
1031.96
HORSNELL,JUDITH A
846902
NELSON,JEAN
872921
GAYNOR,VIRGINIA A 1781.77
FRY,PATRICIA 1462.43
LIVINGSTON,JOYCE L 837.14
THOMPSON,DEBRA J 480.65
EKSTRAND,THOMAS G
1938.83
ROBERTS,KENNETH
1971.76
CARVER,NICHOLAS N
1908.83
KELLY,LISA
1052.58
NORDQUIST,RICHARD
1544.83
OTIS, MARY ELLEN M
64.10 15
CHRISTENS,EN, JODIE D
746.15
C0`LM4AW , ?HILIP
193o8-6
YARR, D IE m
3 DE :. 16
HORWATH „ RONALD J
4 0 8..32
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
JOHNSON , MEGAN M
2 6 0.9 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
LARSON DEBRA
�
2 4 6. 16
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
MOORE,VANESSA J
729.93
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
SAVAGEAU,STEPHEN D
1393.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
SEEGER,GERALD F
391.11
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
STEINHORST , JEFFREY
467971
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
SWANSON , LYLE
14 8 4.7 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
COSTELLO , SHARON L
325912
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
BRAND STROM , RYAN Me
12 6.0 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA A
2255908
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
SCHMIDT JASON E
�
1470.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
06/23/00
FLUG,MEGAN L
93975
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DE PO SIT
06/23/00
SVENDSEN,RUSTIN L
2060.00
78888
06/23/00
CARDINAL,ROBERT J.
385.50
78889
06/23/00
WASILUK,JULIE A
339927
78890
0.6/23/00
HENSLEY,PATRICIA
159.36
78891
06/23/00
ZICK,LINDA
299.00
78892
06/23/00
INGVOLDSTAD,CURTIS J
80.00
78893
06/23/00
CUDE,LARRY J
391.71
78894
06/23/00
EDSON,KAREN L
940.00
7 8:8 95
- - - - -0 6 / 2 3 /
DAWN -- M - - ----- - - - - --
755
78896
06/23/00
MATHEY:S, ALANjA KAYE
163 0 a 70
'78897
0 6 /23 / 0 0
JOHNSON , BONNIE
8 3 3.77
7.8898
061231 DD
VIETOR, LORRAINE S
162 8 . 07
718899
06/23/00
PALAM MARY KAY
1753.18
21
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE G ROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
789D.0
06/23/00
RICHIEICAROLt L
1636*77
78901
0-6/23/00
RYAN.
2935e09
78902
06/'23/00
SVENDSEN,JOANNE M
15 3Z. 0 3
78 .- g .n,i
%ffto
06/23/00
BARTZ
2132*52
789-04
06/23./00
BUSACK P
1434985
78905
0-16/23/00
XONGTOMMY T
1244.83
789-06
06/23/00
WATCZAK
1936*83
78.907
06/23/00
WELCHLIN,CABOT V
1996*83
781-9110-9
0,6/23/00
MEEHAN ,. JAMES
2333*73
789.09
0.6/23/00 .
'
MORNING, TIMOTHY L
1242937
78-910
06/23JOD
SHORTREED ,MICHAEL P
2364o17
78
CHLEBECK,JUDY M
1564.03
7.89,12
06/23100
NlVEN,AMY S
540.02
781913
06/23/0.0
ELIAS,BENJAMIN G
80.0.00
78914
0,6/23/00
ELIAS,BRIAN J
8 00.0 0
78915
0-6/23/.00
FREBERG,RONALD L
1590.43
78,91.6
0.6/23/00
aONES R
134-80-03
78917
,-
06/23/00
ELIAS,, G
1928e03
78918
06/.23/GO
EM14S,MELISSA K
819000
78919
0:6 2 3 ao
LINDBLOM I RANDAL
2108*03
78920
0.6/23/00
EDSON B
1591*51
78921
0-6/21/00
HELEY B
1590*43
78922
0-6./23/0,0
HINNENKAMP . GARY
1543*91
78923
0,6/-23/00
LAVAQUE, MICHAEL
1532*03
78.9-24
06/23/0.0
LINDORFF,DENNIS P
1561.63
zz
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
78925
06/23/00
LUND,ERIC
640o0,0
78926
0,6/23/00
NAUGHTON W
920900
78927
06/23/00
POSSERT I RYAN
840.00
78.928
0,-6/23/00
RODRIGUEZ,RAUL J
578.25
78929*
06/23/0 0
KUDA L
427950
7893,0
.016/23/0-0
MACY
60994
78931
0,6/23/00
SOUTTER , CHRISTINE
3990.0
78932
06/23/0,0
WEGWERTH A
1508403
78933
06/2.3/00
ANDERSO,N,EVERETT
211e79
78934
0,6/23/00
OSTROM
2213*63
78935
06/23/0 :0
WENGER J
1844*03
789-36
06/ 2 3 GO
BAL LESTRAZZE M
234905
78-937
06/2-3/00
BRANDSTROM, MARY C
54.00
78938
016/23/00
FINN S
1360.83
78939
06/23/00
FLUG,,.ELAINE R
366*75
7-8940
0;.6./23/00
FORT IER S
472*5;0
78941
0:6 2 3 0-0
FRANK I LAURA
36:0-0 0.0
7,8942
0,6/23/00
GEBHARD R
240e50
789-43
0!6/23/00
GLASS,DANIEL M
76.
78944
06/23/00
KRUMEL,JOSEPH C
52.50
78945
06/23/00
LINN L
558.00
78:94:6
06/23/010
MCBRIDE,PATRICK D
28 640
7-8-947
G6/23/010
NELSON I HEATHER N
477.00
789,48
0.6/23/00
NIEMCZYK N
33975
78949
0,6/23/0.0
SCHOEN,DEREK W
82.25
23
CITY.OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
78950
.06/23/00
SHOBERG A
17e50
78951
WERNER M
141.38
78952
G6/23/00
GERMAIN
1577o95
78,953
06/23/00
NADEAU I EDWARD A
2135-923
78954
06/23/00
PRIEFER, BRIAN W
340.00
789,55
0-6/23/00
SCHULTZ M
1432. 73
78956
026/23/0-0
GLASS,JEAN
9729,66
78957
06/23/00
HO.IUM,SHEILA
968.06
7.8958
06/23/00
KARASTAMARA A
822 e 76
78-959
01-6/23/00
OGREN A
321e28
7.8960
06/23/00
POWERS. L
214920
789:61
0-6 / 2 3 0:0
RIDLEHOOVER, KATE 1
378908
7819-62
06/23/00
SALZBRENNER,HEIDI T
133*13,
low
78-9-oi
06/23/00
SCHMIDT
.
1251 413
78.964
06/23/00
SEVERSON M
49*14
7-9-965
0,6/23/010
SHOBERG.CARY J
615ol1
789616
06/23/0-0
SMITH,AMY L
103*70
789:.67
06/23/00
ABRAHAMSON L.
26-2o5O
78968
06/23/00
ANDERS.ON,JULIE M
341*62
7:8969
06/23/00
ANDERSON TIMOTHY R
1
278*80
78970
06/23/00
BACHMAN T
107*25
7-8971
076/23/0,0
BlTTNER,KATIE C
542*77
78972
0-6/23/00
CHAPMAN,JENNY A
418.54
78973
06/23/0.0
DEMPSEY M
137*45
78-974
06/23/00
DeGRAW,KRYSTAL M
310o91
i
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
7:8975
0-6/23/00
ERICKSON , CAROL A
20920
78976
061/23/00
FERRISE M
198925
7-8977
06/23/00
FLOR PAT
36981
7897.8
06/23/00
FRET Z. . SARAH J
102*75
78979
06/23/00
FRUCI- L
-60o13
78980
0;6/23/0:0
GRUENHAGEN C
79*40
78,981
.06/23/00
HAGGERTY A
145*50
789,82
06/23/00
H
AWKE:,RYAN A
543072
718-983
0,,6/23/00
HEIM J
58.00
78984
06/23/020
HEINN L
175,673
789-85
06/23/00
HILLSrCH-RISTINE M
180*38
718986
06/23/00
HOLMGREN LEAH M
327.05
78.9,87
06/23/00
HORNING M
28.00
78988
0.6123/00
HOULE L
174915
7898-9
0-6,/23/0.0
HUPPERT,ERIN M
370*94
78990
0-6/23/00
IKHAML
.,JOHN
13.8*76
78991
06./23/00
IRISH D
61.75
789,92
06/23/00
JOHNSON ROBERT P
383.43
78993
06/*23./00
KAHLER G
22*75
78:9.94
06/ 2 3/ GO
KER.SCHNER,BRANDON R
39*00
78995
06./23/00
KERSCHNER M
81.8:8
799-9,16
06/23/0.0
KOEHNEN B
532.61
7899017
0,6/23/00
MEISEL
25.95
78998
OZ/23/00
MEVERDEN J
108.08
78999
0-6/23/00
MOS SONG IANDREA M
110.5 :0
25
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
790100
-06123/00
MOTZ M
3.1*73
79001
06/23/00
O:IREAGAN
59*75
79002
06/23/00
OLSON,ABIGAIL E
141.38
79G03
0--6/23/00
OWEN
307*90
790°04
06/23/00
PEHOSKI T
232.53
79005
-.
06 ;
SCHAEFER, ROB J
86e13
79006
06/23/00
SHERRILL D
112*14
790.07
0`6/23/00
SIMONSON M
542*3-1
79008
06../23/00
SMITH M
35*25
79,009
06/2.3/00
S.MITLEY I SHARON L
199.00
79010
0-6./23/00
STEINKE P
104.80
7,91011
06/23/00
SWANER
186955
79-012
06/23/00
THELL,HEIDI
36.00
791013
0:6/23/00
1BODEAU
T HEATHER J
85*50
79-014
0.6/23/00
WARNERCAROLYN
79*6-0
79015
06/23/00
WEDES,CARYL H
117.0.0
79016
01:6/23/00
WELTER M
8-8e43
79017
:06/23/00
WHITE I TIMOTHY M
13-080
79018
06/23/00
WHITING, ROBIN A
19.50
7,
:
0 6 /23/0-0
WILLIAMS I KELLY M
903.0 -6
790--2-0
06/23/00
W10ODMAN E
385*75
79Z,21
0:6/23/GO
WORWA M
91o70
79022
06/23/00
Z.I.ELINSKIoJENNIFER L
99*33
79023
016/23/00
BOSLEY
133*25
,79,024
0.6/23/00
FLEMING A
93944
i
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
79.025
0-6/231/00
GROPPOLI.LINDA. M
108.50
79-026
06 / 2 3, 0,0
-ANSEN
H O ANNA K
6 0,9:4
790-27
016/23/0-0
HORNING M
2700.0
79028
0,6/23/0-0
HUPPERT- L
3,6000
79029
06/23/00
JOHNSONfNANCY A
39o00
79030
0.6/23/00
SCHROEDER.
361*05
790.31
66/23/00
SHERRILL A
130.01
79032
0:6/23/G0
ANTON,SARAH E
140e07
79033
06/23/00
BEHAN..JAMES
130 .4oO3
79.03.4
OZ/23/00
BZSTLAND, DTI COLE R
16.0 0
79035
0-6/23/00
BLAKESLEY D
88000
7`
06/23/00
BLANCHARD KEVIN J
6-6920
-
79037
0.6/23/00
BOTTOLFSON R.
609010
79.038
06/23/00
CHAPEAU GREG M
423.41
79039
06123/00
DOUGLASS, TOM
19,8000
79.0140
01-6/23/00
GRENDZINSKI,,DIANE J
9-4o5-0
719.041
0:6] 2 3 / 0:0
HEMPFER W
81090
79 1
06-1/213/00
J DAVI-D J
A-
1328*83
790,43
06/23/00
KOSKI,JOHN F
895.79
7 9.04 4
016/23/010
KYRK,,ASHLEY
72.0 0
79045
06/23/00
KYRK K
93o52
79046
06/23/00
LONETTI F
230.58
791047
06/23/00
MORIN,TROY J
174.00
79,048
0:6/23/00
PATTERSON
625o00
7904.9
06/23/00
PRINS M
212*63
27
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE
79050
7-5-0-51
79052
79053
79.054
79055
06/23/00
0-6/123/00
0.6/.23/00
G6/23/00
06/23/G0
0.16 / .2 3 00
AMOUNT
677408.0
192-000
257 * 40
138,81.983
1727.23
155-5,71
315321.8-6
AGMA t
MEMORANDUM
TO: Acting City Manager
FROM: Community Development Director M)C....,
SUBJECT: Community Development Staffing Request
DATE: July 3, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Action by ConncH
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The Community Development Department is requesting approval to add a part time clerk typist
position. The quality and timeliness of our responsiveness to the development community y are
suffering. There are several factors contributing to our need for additional staff. Foremost, is
simply the number of building permits issued and the number of phone calls received. The
community development support staff is responsible for many work functions. They primarily
include the following: processing and recording building permit information, contractor licensin
and providing secretarial support to the two planners, environmental health officer, building
inspectors and official and the director. The current work load and the time associated with it
exceed the number of staff hours in the budget.
ANALYSIS
Following is a breakdown of the primary work functions and the time _associated with each
activity:
Average time to issue a building permit (includes accepting, distributing and issuing) 1 hr. 15 min.
In 1999 we issued 3225 building permits which translate into 4030 hours work per year
p y
Receipting plumbing, heating and electrical permits - 1200 hours per year
Contractor licencing 150 hours per year
Inspection recordings 150 hours per year
Phone calls- 400 -450 hours per year (this represents three phones in the CD dept only and 35% of
all phone calls coming into city hall.
Planning and secretarial support which includes proofing reports, mailing public hearing notices
and surveys and doing minutes for the planning commission, CDRB and HRA. - 1400 hours p er
year.
The total hours required to complete the above described functions is 7350. Currently we are
staffed at 5800 hours. There is a shortfall of 1550 hours. Because of this shortfall, certain tasks
such as recording and filing are not completed and building permits take longer to process. The
building activity level is not slowing down. We have issued 1450 permits as of May 31, 2000.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests that $11,700 be transferred from the contingency fund to 101- 701 - 000 -4025 to
increase support services with a part time clerk typist.
AGMAn�s
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Ken Haider, Acting City Manager
FROM:
Colleen Callahan
SUBJECT:
Resolution of Appreciation for Barbara Skoglund
DATE:
June 28, 2000
INTRODUCTION
C
Date
Endorsed
Modred
Rejected
Barbara Skoglund resigned from the Human Relations Commission Board on May 6, 2000.
Refer-to her letter on page 2. Attached please find a resolution of appreciation for Barbara.
Barbara served on the Maplewood Human Relations Commission Board for one year from April
6, 1999 to May 6, 2000.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached resolution.
Barbara Skoglund
1969 Price Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109
651.748.9771
1 June 2000
Colleen Callahan
Maplewood City Hall
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Colleen:
Per our conversation last month, I'm writing to formally resign from the Maplewood Human
Relations Commission. As you know there are three key reasons for my resignation.
The commission is very indecisive and inactive. One month the group will agree to a project and
then change its mind the next month. One example is when I offered to design the content of the
display board. The chair was dismissive of my offer. Months go by and we still have a blank
display, so I decide to draft a design and bring it to a meeting. The chair was absent and all present
provided positive feedback to the design and told me to go ahead and produce it. I told you I needed
the dimensions and you indicated you'd have the chair call me with them. The next month the chair
returns and is dismissive of the design and other members become wishy washy on the issue.
Months later I'm asked why. I haven't brought in the display. I remind the committee that the former
chair didn't want me to make it and refused to give me the dimensions of the display. Now that I've
resigned I'm asked to produce the display immediately. I've tried to volunteer my talents and time,
but feel alternatingly rebuffed or dumped on.
I am also increasingly frustrated by the intolerance and bias exhibited by fellow commission
members. I don't believe that racism and heterosexism belong on a commission that is supposed to
uphold Minnesota's Human Rights Law. My recent poor attendance is. because I want to avoid the
biased comments of fellow commission members about - "those'peo p le M Y desire to end such
intolerance is why I applied for this particular commission. I find it abhorrent that vocal bigots are
allowed to serve on and lead this commission.
The third reason stems from the recent change in local leadership. When I applied to the
commission I wanted to play an active part in my community and local government. The recent
changes in local government and actions of the new council are contrary to my beliefs and I do not
want to be affiliated with the current administration.
I have enjoyed working with you Colleen and wish you the best in your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Barbara Skoglund
JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Barbara Skoglund has been a member of the Maplewood Human
Relations Commission Board since April 6, 1999 and has served faithfully in that
capacity; and
WHEREAS, the Human Relations Commission Board has appreciated her
experience, insights and good judgement; and
WHEREAS, Barbara has freely given of her time and energy, without
compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, Barbara has shown dedication to her duties and has consistently
contributed her leadership and effort for the benefit of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBYRESOL VED for and on behalf of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens that Barbara Skoglund is hereby extended our
gratitude and appreciation for her dedicated service and we wish her continued success in
the future.
Passed by the Maplewood
City Council on
Robert Cardinal, Mayor
Passed by the Human
Relations Commission
Board on
Donna Brown, Chair
Attest:
Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
AGENDA IfnTrr]EEMM Na
Action by Council
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager Endors
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner
Modffied
SUBJECT. Conditional Use Permit and Design Review —
g Goodrich Gc�
Clubhouse
LOCATION: 1820 van Dyke Street
DATE: June 26, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Kevin Finley, of Ramsey County Parks and Recreation, is proposing o build a 1 700 s -
g � square -foot
addition onto the Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse. Refer to the maps on pages 4-6 and the
letter on page 7. The exterior of the clubhouse would be cultured stone board & batten
siding and d n siding,
horizontal lap g ark green asphalt shingles. The building would be green, beige and
natural wood color. Refer to the plans.
The proposed, enlarged clubhouse would have bathrooms with g chan in areas a ban quet room,
snack bar, and outdoor patio.
g
Requests
Mr. Finley is requesting that the city approve:
rove:
1.
'A conditional use permit (CUP) to expand a public buildin . Section ` -- .
p p g _ action 36 ..437. of the city code
- requires a CUP for a public service or public building uses in an zoning .
g y rag distract.
2'. The building design, site and landscape plans.
DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit
The city council should approve this permit. The proposed, enlarged building would be
g g attractive
and would improve the - appearance of the clubhouse. county This would benefit the b ty p
i
i
their golf facility and the neighborhood as yell. There s a substantial amount of
available so parking would not be a problem.
. p 9
Landscaping
The applicant has proposed attractive landscaping for this site. Code requires that th
Or owner install an in- q e developer
r
g waived if there is an alternative sprinkler system for any new landscaped areas. The sprinklenn
requirement can be wai ' - 9
Live method for watering plantings. The golf
course is essentially a lawn and landscaping maintenance operation. An in-ground lawn
irrigations .stem is not needed g
Y since the grounds would be properly maintained as they always
have been.
COMMISSION ACTION
On June 13, 2000, the community design review board recommended approval of the design
plans for the project.
pp g
On June 19, 2000, the planning commission recommended approval of the conditional use
permit for the project.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Approve the- resolution on pages 8-9. This resolution approves a conditional use ermit for
the Goodrich Golf Course and clubhouse
use expansion at 1$20 Van Dyke Street. The council
bases the permit on the findings required by code and it is subject to the following
conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
2. The applicant must begin construction within one year after the council approves this
permit or the permit shall pp
p p end. The city council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
B. Approve the architectural and site lans date-stamped May 26
p p y , 2000 and the landscape
plan dated. June 13, 2000 for the Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse :addition, subject to the
indings required 'by the city code. The developer-shall do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building p ermit for this
project.
2. Submit a grading, drainage and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval
prior to getting a building permit.
3. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
2
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 40,000 square feet
Existing land use: Existing Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Goodrich Golf Course
East: Goodrich Golf Course
South: North St. Paul Road and the future Woodland Hills Church
West: Goodrich Golf Dome
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: P (park)
Zoning: F (farm residence)
CUP Findings
Section 36- 442(x) states that the city council shall base approval, of a CUP o '
pp n the findings listed
in the resolution on pages 8-9.
p:sec14\gooddch.cup
Attachments:
I . Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Applicant's letter dated May 26, 2000
5. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
6. Architectural plans date - stamped May 26, 2000 and landscape plan dated June 13, 2000 (separate
attachments)
3
Attachment 1
LOCATION MAP Q
4 N
NORTH SAINT PAUL
Affarhmon+ 7
RES. _
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
s
4
N
Attachment 3
.r. w
1' d�
J
- Sand
t 18th -
1 Green
I
v
1 ,
t t Ba
a '
r
r
d t t�� r t
1p
970
I . 1 PA110 f
• � '`u,' f
974 87 ,` •: 1 . 8 M ELEV. 1
Ae
i 1
• ADDITION i tt _ r•
t �; r ADDITION
_ P5`�'
1
WALL
. :1 Marc
1 -- X
� -
111 1 11 -� • �:% 976
all .
AL-
�1
972
L ux
.� T��
®T — --./
NEW ACCESSIBLE CART PATH
0 LESS THAN 1:20 MAXIMUM SLOPE f
SITE PLAN
6
4
N
Attachment 4
Parrs and Recreation Department
Gregory A. Mack, Director
_ 2015N. Van Dyke Street
RAMSFr couMY Maplewood, MN 55109 -3796
May 26, 2000
Ms. Melinda Coleman
Community Development Director
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Ms. Coleman:
Tel: 651 -748 -2500
Fax: 651- 748 -2508
www.co.ramsey.mn.us
Ramsey County is requesting approval from the City of Maplewood to remodel the existing
Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse and construct a 1,700 square foot addition. The
remodeled and expanded clubhouse will be operated in a similar manner as it is now and will
provide more seating space for golf tournaments, meetings and other events.
The existing clubhouse was constructed in the late 1960's and the golf course has been in
operation since the mid -1950 s. The building will improve the character of the surrounding
area and will not depreciate property values in the area. The use of the clubhouse will not
create nuisances .and will have no impact on current vehicular traffic on local streets.. The
public facilities will not. be impacted in terms of cost or burden on the systems. The site of
the clubhouse .will. be enhanced by incorporating the natural and scenic features as part of
the public��golf course. The clubhouse will cause no adverse environmental . m acts and will
{. p
continue to' be used by 'the public as a recreation facili : 1. The clubhouse ,o � - era
tY p tion. wiIl
comply with all city ordinances.
This statement accompanies the application and documentation as required by the City.
Enclosed are design plans prepared by HCM Architects. There are also documents provided
by the Ramsey County Property Records and Revenue Department that list the property
owners and addresses for properties within 350 feet of the Goodrich Clubhouse site and the
legal description for Goodrich Golf Course.
Ramsey County intends to follow all of the standards established by the City of Maplewood in
the development and use of the Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse. Ramsey County requests
that the City of Maplewood approve the remodeling and expansion of the Goodrich Golf
Course Clubhouse. Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Kevin C. Finley
Director of Operations
KC F/j j h
Enclosure
7
A T 6 2C�u
�w
Minnesota's First Home Rule County
printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10% post - consumer content
� �„ ."
Attachment 5
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Ramsey County applied for a conditional use permit for the Goodrich Goff Course
and to add onto the clubhouse.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at 1820 Van Dyke Street The legal
description is:
SECTION 1.4, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, SUBJECT TO STREETS AND AYES AND
EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND EXCEPT PART OF N Y2 OF SW 1/4
SOUTHEASTERLY OF NORTH ST.- PAUL ROADAND SOUTHWESTERLY -OF HAZEL
STREET AND EXCEPT THE WEST 810 FEET OF NORTH % OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND
EXCEPT THE WEST 810 FEET OF THE SOUTH 235 8/10 FEET OF SOUTH Y OF
NORTHWEST 1/4 AND EXCEPT THE WEST 870 FEET OF THE SOUTH % OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 LYING NORTH OF SAID SOUTH 235 8/10 FEET THE NORTH Y2 OF
SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND SOUTH Y2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 ALL IN SECTION 14
TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 19, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this permit.
2. On July 10, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. �Ci . staff
� tY published a notice in - ,.:...
the paper and. sent notices to the surrounding property owners: - The council gave
everyone.at the .hearing a chance to speak and present vvritten� statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would. be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
m
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The applicant must begin construction within one year after the council approves this
permit or the permit shall end. The city council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on July 10, 2000.
0
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, JUNE 19, 2000
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse Conditional Use Permit (1820 Van Dyke Street)
Ken Roberts, associate planner, summarized the staff report. Commissioner Rossbach asked at
what point the county would be told about the possibility of eliminating a section of North St.' Paul
Road so that this street would turn onto the Ripley Avenue alignment. He pointed out that this
would affect the proposed area where golf carts will be stored. Mr. Roberts felt that, since North St.
Paul Road is a county road, the county would be involved "early on in the planning process." Ken
Haider, city-engineer, said there are "some things in the .works" that would make this possible
realignment more difficult.
Kevin Finley, director of operations of the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department,
offered some history about the proposed project. He indicated that the carts would be stored closer
to the building and would not be on the corner.
Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Approval of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for the Goodrich Golf Course
and clubhouse expansion at 1820 Van Dyke Street. The council bases the permit on the
findings required by code and it is subject to the following conditions:
1. . All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The-director of. community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The applicant must begin construction within one year after the council approves this permit
or the permit shall end. The city council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes all
The motion passed.
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JUNE 13, 2000
VI. DESIGN REVIEW
C. Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse Addition, 1820 Van Dyke Street
Secretary Tom Ekstrand presented the staff report. He said there will be a uniform look
between the existing building and the addition. Chairperson Ledvina asked if the provision for
an irrigation system was usually incorporated in the landscape plan. Mr. Ekstrand said the
code requires lawn irrigation, but the city can waive this requirement if another suitable form
of watering is available. He felt, in this case, the golf course was in the "lawn- maintenance
business" so he wasn't concerned about them taking care of the landscape.
Kevin Finley, director of operations for Ramsey County Parks and Recreation, spoke about
the project. He introduced Roger Christensen of HCM Architects who is the architect for the
addition. Mr. Finley showed various sketches of the proposed building and described the
features. He presented both small copies and a large board of the landscape plan. The
board discussed the plan with the applicant. Chairperson Ledvina thought the building was
very attractive and fit well on the site.
Boardmember Jorgenson moved the Community Design Review Board:
B. Approve the plans (date - stamped May 26, •2000),and the landscape plan (dated June 13, ,
2000) for the Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse addition, subject to the findings required
by the city code. The developer shall do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Submit a grading, drainage and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval
prior to getting a building permit.
3. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Boardmember LaCasse seconded. Ayes all
The motion passed.
AGENDA rrEM N O_�
MEMORANDUM Action by Council
Date
TO: City Manager Endorsed
Modifed --- --�...
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditions! Use Permit Revision - Amusement Ci Ex R a e e sion
LOCATION: 1870 Rice Street
DATE: June 29, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Dan Betts, owner of Amusement City, 187O Rice Street, is requesting approval to enlarge his
facility to the south. He is proposing to extend his existing race track, add a new smaller track
and put in a paint -bail field.. Mr. Betts is also proposing to remodel the inside of a buildin
currently used for video games as a pizza restaurant. Refer to the maps on pages 5 -7 and the
letter on page 8.
Request
Mr. Betts is requesting that the city council approve a revision to his conditional use permit (CUP)
to expand his facility and convert an existing building into a pizza restaurant.
BACKGROUND
Refer to the Past Actions on page 4.
DISCUSSION
CUP Revision / Facility Expansion 1 Paint -Bail Field
Staff does not object to the expansion of the amusement facility for the additional race track
space and pizza restaurant. The paint -ball field, however, is not allowed by city code. Refer to
the memo on page 9-10 from Lieutenant Thomalla. In light of the codes rohibitin the
P 9
discharge of firearms in the city, staff cannot commend approval of this aspect proposed
ect of the
expansion. The applicant should also remove the signs that are up advertising "paintball P ark. "
Wetland
The wetland on the site is a Class 5 Wetland. This is the least significant wetland described in
the wetland ordinance. The applicant does not have to provide any wetland-protection buffer but
must not encroach within it with the expansion. The plans show that the expansion would not
encroach.
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
June 13, 2000: The community design review board recommended approval of the revised site
plan. The issue about the paint ball course was not known at this meeting.
g
June 19, 2000: The planning commission recommended denial of the CUB.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution on pages 11 -13 to revise the conditional
1 use p ermit for Amusement pity at
1870 Rice Street. This revised permit is for the proposed facility expansion an ' •
pica restaurant in tY P d the addition of a
an existing building. The following revisions - are based on the findings
required by the code and subject to the following onditions (additions
deletions are cros sed out): g are underlined and
M i6 ts gasumagh o
..
W .
•
..
084 is .
..
The suspension of the driving ranae shall be in effect until a ' .
pubic hearing has been held and
the suspension by the city council ended. The conditional •
use permit for the remainder of the
facility is still in effect. The property owner shall comp with t • •
approval:
P Y he following revised conditions of
PP
1. Comply with the approved site plan dated May 16 2000
exception . 4RI ' ' -
• , with the
' that the paint -ball course shall
not be allowed since the dischar a of firearm ' • . s within ordinance. ci is not ermitted b
2. Maintain the following site improvements:
a. A reflectorized stop sign at the Rice Street driveway.
Y
b. A striped parking lot with at least 94 parkin spaces as s
plan. g P hewn on the November 30
1993 site ,
p . The applicant shall have four handicap parkin stalls and h
• 9 handicap-'
parking signs for each stall. There shall be at least one van -accessible space.
(Americans with Disabilities Act requirement)
c. A trash dumpster enclosure for any outside trash dum ste
p rs subject to staff approval.
2
jw
°
IF 9 - - - - -
-
• • i
_ _ _ _
�Jll OIL ° ° ° -
• Y i - -
- - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
i
The suspension of the driving ranae shall be in effect until a ' .
pubic hearing has been held and
the suspension by the city council ended. The conditional •
use permit for the remainder of the
facility is still in effect. The property owner shall comp with t • •
approval:
P Y he following revised conditions of
PP
1. Comply with the approved site plan dated May 16 2000
exception . 4RI ' ' -
• , with the
' that the paint -ball course shall
not be allowed since the dischar a of firearm ' • . s within ordinance. ci is not ermitted b
2. Maintain the following site improvements:
a. A reflectorized stop sign at the Rice Street driveway.
Y
b. A striped parking lot with at least 94 parkin spaces as s
plan. g P hewn on the November 30
1993 site ,
p . The applicant shall have four handicap parkin stalls and h
• 9 handicap-'
parking signs for each stall. There shall be at least one van -accessible space.
(Americans with Disabilities Act requirement)
c. A trash dumpster enclosure for any outside trash dum ste
p rs subject to staff approval.
2
d. Direct or shield the lights so the bulbs are not directly visible from any public street.
(code requirement)
3.
Future revisions to the a roved site Dian must come before the citV council for their review
and a roval exce t that minor changes, mav be a roved b
evelopment. the director of communi
y
4. The applicant must not encroach into the wetland with this s_ expansion.
5. The 45 "new" Darking s aces shown on the May 16. 2000 site Ian must be gaved, stri ed
and have continuous concrete curbin around the entire ad n lot unless breaks are
re uired bv the gh en ineer for drainage reasons. The-apolicant shall also eliminate the
furthest southeast oarkina space since access to this spacers limited.
6. The hours of o eration for the amusements and times shall
be 1 • a. m. to 10 p. m. The
restaurant may be open until-1 I p,_
L. The ON council shall review this permit in one year.
8 The owner shall remove all signs advert, isina t= paintball park.
3
PAST ACTIONS
November 17, 1977: The city council approved the CUP for the amusement facility.
October 22, 1931: Staff approved- a racetrack addition.
March 9, 1982: The design board approved the bumper boats, mini -golf and batting cages.
April 25 1994: The council revised the CUP to include the driving range..
October 11, 1994: Staff approved a siding change for the equipment building.
May 22, 1995: The council extended the CUP for one year.
May 20, 1998: The council extended the CUP for another Y ear.
October 29, 1996: Ms. Carolyn: Wilkerson submitted a petition, signed by 123 people, requesting
that the city council close Amusement City's driving range.
November 25, 1996: The city council "moved to set a public hearing to formally review the CUP
to determine whether there are valid safety issues which should result in amending or revoking
the permit."
March 10, 1997: The city council held a public hearing to review Ms. Wilkerson's request. The
council renewed the CUP, but required the owners of the driving range to do the following:
: g g
1. Increase the height of the netting to 65 feet . along the north side of the driving range.
2. Aim the tee boxes, where practical, toward the southeast corner of the driving range.
3. Cease storing vehicles. on the driving range.
4. Provide verification that the business is using only low trajectory golf balls.
. � rY 9
5.. Submit a statement indicating how they will claims for damages.
The council also moved to review this permit again in one year.
June 23, 1997: The city cou ncil amended the CUP to suspend the operation of the driving range
e 9
portion of this amusement facility because of complaints about golf ball damage, the storing of
vehicles on the site without the proper approvals and violation of CUP req uirements that
pertained to the driving range. The CUP for the rest of the amusement facility is still in effect.
March 30, 1998: The city council reviewed the CUP and authorized review again in one year
p:sec181amucity5.cup
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Applicants Letter of Request
5. Memo from Lieutenant Thomalla
6. CUP Resolution
4
Attachment I
LTME CANADA
�• . • 0
• COLWTY
SKILL
IL
Kolk
U
� �v
M
IL
Sr4lNT PAUL
LOCATION MAP
a
crow- 44
Ca I
Mai E. De of a.J
A q 1 9&2f% i N.SAL LAS r
:
s .. ., ' •;. • ROSELAWN "ENUE,,.
11
' �� •o •• .
PROPERTY OWNED BY
—_, -o* . DAN BETTS
po
6 t ncs'•
17 v
4 0 • r •• l or:
'A.
ZS' 7
340 t
S 5 c
E4
!s : ; AMUSEMENT_ CITY
G - to
-•, !} 13 0l .-A �1 �G 4 K 11 L i �� 14 ►S� _ _
1'•
•,- - - c _- A+c' C : . �) x!82 4.13 `c Z -1•► ,
.• -,• •> sos 5 pe off.
. ' .. • ti ;:• :tire }: .} :tiff :•r :.• • • ,, -
ti f r L �e S
S R O
' SED -.
- 1 IQt'A.jf ► `
r J 2
1 x � •e EANS.
o
W A
:,, f •:fs Y.::t:.::. •r
341-7 LI
ui
P V P' t v
man
ul
2.4430 1
7?'1' .a
. , is b
' y Q
22
5. 5 0
IT
B c
j��
• 31
�T Pa v L %v T R Yv o R KS
7 q - -• I Z 3 3 35 •...._. Y I .- -__-•- G
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
Q
N
Attachment 3
, -- od
Tl ls�
•
ui
D
Z.
ui
>
<IV
Z
IWO)
0
•
CHALET LOUNGE
RICE STREET
SITE PLAN
&
'4��
AMUSEMENT CITY
7
<
N
PROPOSE
EXPANSION AREA
Attachment 4
L.B. AMUSEMENT CITY., INC.
1870 RICE ST.,
ST. PAUL,, MN 55113
T G S
PI
-
J.k.
Zi
7j 3 V
Al
C
TO wHom IT MAY CONCERN:
Amusement Cit Inc. located at 1870 Rice St., Maplewood, MN is expandin its operation.
Which would include a Pizza Restaurant located in the front buildin Also in addition to this we
will be addin a third g o cart track and a splat ta field.
Sincerely,
Attachment 5
MEMO
To: Chief Winger
From: Lt. David Thomalla 4
Subject: Amusement City Ac ivity
Date: June 22, 2000
I received a call today from a concerned citizen regarding proposed expansion and modification of
the conditional use permit for this business at 1870 Rice Street.
The caller indicated Amusement City has proposed ' a paint ball course and an all-night
pizza restaurant. The caller indicated the paint ball course is already in place and in use.
r
Lt. Banick and I went to the business, and asked if Dan Betz, the owner, was there. We were told
he was not. We asked permission to look at the p aint ball course which the employee anted.
granted.
We went to the course and found it very well developed. It appears it has been in operation for
Pe
several years. Paint ball residue is on the ground and in the wetlands on the property. It appears
some excavation has been done to alter the wetlands. As we left the area, Mr. Betz arrived. Lt.
Banick asked an employee how long the course has been operated. The employee told him three
or four years. When I asked Mr. Betz, he smirked and responded, '
"yesterda '. Mr. Betz tried to
tell us the guns used for this activity were water powered. I asked if they were CO2 Po wered and
.he said `yes ". Near the course we saw two large `M' compressed: cylinders. One was
chained to a :wooden post. but the other was laying on it's side on the ound� unsecured. Mr
Betz said the issue of his permit is o' before the C council on 1 10:e a '
going ty my added he is being
s y � some members of the pl�unning conunission
As we spoke to Mr. Betz, I noticed the back door of what was once the game room standing
open I was told by the caller to whom I spoke this building is the proposed pizza business.
Construction of this appears to be well under way as I could see stud walls visible through the
open door. Mr. Betz has applied for a building permit for this business modification which has not
been granted.
The information I obtained raises many concerns. Discharge of a firearm within the city limits is
illegal. Apparently Mr. Betz has allowed this to occur for several years and is now asking for a
permit to violate a city ordinance. I am unaware of the composition of paint balls, but it may be
possble that these objects may pollute the adjacent stream. Mr. Betz has apparently already
started construction which has not been approved or for which a permit has not been obtained
11k �etz.mayal� be. storing �cummessedil1e�„a�ty_
I brought this to the afte6tion of Ms. Cokmn and Ae asked that - I domment this
I have also attached a copy ofthe poTwe department's calls for -see to this business since the
begkning of 2000.
9
l L..CL1 . y l� V L'
Add# : 001870 Street: rice st
3rt :.. r.._ .. .:rte _..a. >. :a•t;,: ., ,s L..:::x . _ .. !..•.:;..
AM t� � t i tr `+ ,i. aI a.J a• . .. . -_ .. .. .:. .. :.::_�
: "` "`�` `- • L
Date
Agy: 4
ACTIV
A pt:
Rptd:
01 /01 /00
-- INC ISN
DATE - TM
RPTD
ITY
INCIDENT LOCATION.
00003670
1
03/04/00
1319
09420
1870 rice st, .maplewood
Juris : 04
PI - MV
00005741
Juris : 04
1
04/07/00
1721
09903
1870 rice st, maplewood;
amusement
_ city
00005857
Juris
1
04/09/00
1242
09840
Warra arrest
1870 rice stp maplewood;
amusement
city
: 04
00005961
1
04/11/00
0627
09806
City ordlance complaints
1870 rice st, maplewood;
am
amusement
�
Juris •
•04
Alarm -'all others
t
city �
00006822
Juris : 04
1
04/23/00
1740
09812
1870 rice st, maplewood;
amusement
nt
city
00006827
Juris
1
04/23/00
1910
09802
911 Calls (hang up)
1870 rice st, maplewood;
am
amusement
t
city
: 04
Public assist
-
�
00008662
Juris 04
1
05/20/00
1821
09800
1870 rice st, maplewood;-
amusement
t
city t
.
00008865
Ju rls: 04
1
05/23/00
1736
n307O
Misc public calls
1870 rice st, maplewood;
amusement
city
0..0009457
1
06102/00
1217
1
DISTURB PEACE - MS - PUBLIC NUISANCE
f
Juris : 04
-1870 rice st,- maplewood;
Loud party /noise
amusement
city 1
Limited:
y
S U
P E R SEARCH
I NP C I D E N. T
Format: F2
Add#: 001870
Street: rice st
Apt: Date Rptd:
01 /01 /00
AgY: 4
ACTIV
- INC ISN
DATE - TM RPTD
ITY
INCIDENT LOCATION
00010032
1
06/09/00
1946
09800
1870 rice st, maplewood;
amusement
city
Juris : 04
Misc public calls
�
10
Attachment 6
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the city council approved a conditional use permit for an amusement facility
acili ty at
1 870 Rice Street on November 17, 1977 and amended it several times since.
WHEREAS, the property owner is requesting approval of a conditional use permit amendment
to expand his amusement facility to the south onto vacant property and to convert an existing
building into a pizza restaurant.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the following described property:
EISENMENGER AND ZASPEUS LAKE PARK, RAMSEY CO., MINN., SUBJECT TO ST AND
AVE AND VAC STS AND ALLEYS ACCRUING, THE FOL A TRACT LYING NWLY OF SOO
LINE RY R/W OF THE FOL; LOTS 4 THRU 10 BLK 1, LOT 7 BLK 2, LOTS 5 THRU 32
BLK 4, LOTS 12 THRU 25 BLK 6 AND ALL OF BLK 3.
AND
EISENMENGER AND ZASPEL'S LAKE PARK, RAMSEY CO., MINN., SUBJECT TO HWY
THE FOL VAC ALLEY ACCRUING AND LOTS 33 THRU LOT 39 BLK 4.
AND
EISEN M ENDER AND ZASPEL'S LAKE PARK RAMSEI� CO. It�IIN 1 :.
N. VAC ST AND ALLEY
ACCRUING AND LOTS 1 THRU 4 BLK 4.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows:
1. On June 19, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city ouncil den this
permit.
� y
Z. The city council held a public hearing an July 10, 2000. City staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council revise the above - described
conditional use permit revision, based on the following reasons:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surroundin g area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
11
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JUNE 13, 2000
A. DESIGN REVIEW
B. Amusement City Expansion, 1870 Rice Street
Secretary Tom Ekstrand presented the staff report. He clarified that Recommendation 2. b.
(on page 2 of the staff report) should indicate that the 94 parking spaces were shown on the
November 30, 1993, site plan. Also, the 45 "new" spaces that must be paved and striped
(Recommendation 6 on page 3) are shown on the May 16, 2000, plan.
Dan Betts, the applicant, described the proposal. He said the exterior of the building will only
be painted. Mr. Betts also said netting will separate the paintball area from the track.
Boardmember LaCasse felt there wasn't adequate room to turn around at the furthest
southeast parking space. Mr. Ekstrand agreed and said, if this spot is eliminated, it would not
affect the proposal code -wise.
Boardmember LaCasse moved the Community. Design Review Board recommend adoption of
the resolution which revises the conditional use permit for Amusement City at 1870 Rice..,.,
Street. This revised permit is for the proposed-facil�ity expansion and the addition of a pizza
restaurant in an existing building. The., following; revisions are based on the findings: required
_b the: code and subject to the followin conditions additions are underlined and deletions ar
Y J g
{ e
crossed out):
i - - - i - - - - - - - - - - -, 1 • - - i - - - - - 0 - ! - - - t IN
I I LIM _ _
-- - - kwl U - , , - - - - i - - i r , i - - - i - - - - - - w i Lip] LwIff
i - - - - W P - - - - - - - i
-- i - - -- - - - - - - r - ► r r two U - - - - - -- - • -- i -
The suspension of the drivin shall be in effect until a public hearing has been held and
the suspension by the city council ended. The conditional use permit for the remainder of the
facility is still in effect. The property owner shall comply with the following revised conditions
of approval:
Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes of 06 -13 -00
1. Comply with the approved site plan dated Slav 16, 2000 , , with the
exception of the driving range which is hereby terminated.
2. Maintain the following site improvements:
a. A reflectorized stop sign at the Rice Street driveway.
b. A striped parking lot with at least 94 parking spaces as shown on the November 30,
1993, site plan. The applicant shall have four handicap parking stalls and handicap -
parking signs for each stall. There shall be at least one van - accessible space.
(Americans with Disabilities Act requirement)
c. A trash dumpster enclosure for any outside trash dumpsters subject to staff approval.
d. Direct or shield the lights so the bulbs are not directly visible from any public street.
(code requirement)
X11 a " 71119 , •11 ir-A l a .. —.
Iflont-00ONMI(M 11 M11 11�i
Boardmember Johnson seconded. Ayes all
The motion passed.
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, JUNE 19 2000
VI. NEW BUSINESS
B. Amusement City Conditional Use Permit Revision (1870 Rice Street)
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Trippler asked about the
chemical make -up of the paintballs that will be used. He was concerned because the paintball field
is adjacent to the wetland and these could have a detrimental affect. Commissioner Pearson
commented on the current condition of the dumpster site and said it was a "pig- sty." Commissioner
Mueller voiced his concern about the cars that are kept on the site. He felt this site was an
"eyesore" and did not look nice.
Dan Betts, the applicant, said the paintballs were made of a gelatin substance. He indicated that
the dumpster was full because they have recently had many large groups at the facility. Mr. Betts
Y
also noted that there were only six or seven cars left on the site now, as compared to almost forty in
the past. There was some discussion on the paintball field.
Carolyn Peterson, 1999 Jackson Street, said some people in the vicinity of this facility have
complained about the noise, particularly from loudspeakers and often later at night. Mr. Roberts
could not find a condition that addressed the hours of operation. Ms. Peterson wondered where
people would walk when going from the. parking area or Rice Street to the paintball field. Mr. Betts
indicated the path. Ms. Peterson also pointed Out that the paintball, operation, is currently, operating
without city permission. She said this facility has a history of not. - following -the rules or being a good
neighbor. Ms. Peterson was concerned - about adequate parking. being provided,..- particularly
- g p Y - -
handica ed parking
pp. p g -
Ken Roberts suggested. that the commission might want to add a condition about operation.. a
gg g. bou hours of
Commissioner Mueller thought the loud noise could be considered a nuisance. Mr. Betts said the
hours of operation were 10 a.m. to 10 p.m., seven days of the week.
Commissioner Pearson moved the Planning Commission deny the resolution which would revise the
conditional use permit for Amusement City at 1870 Rice Street on the basis of past history, .
noncompliance and current condition of the property.
Commissioner Mueller seconded.
Commissioner Rossbach asked if it was the staff's opinion that there was a history of
noncompliance. Mr. Roberts said there were a lot of problems when the driving range was
operating on the site. Other than that, the biggest problem since then has been the parking of cars
for storage or sale. Mr. Rossbach suggested that denying this request would not fix anything. He
felt it would be better to specify what the commission desired and give the applicant a timeframe to
acompiish it.
Ayes -- Pearson, Leldvina, Trippler, lllfueller
Nays -- Fischer, Frost, 'Rossbach
The motion passed.
Mr. Rossbach voted nay because he felt it would not accomplish anything. Mr. Mueller said he
needed to see "more positive movement" before he was willing to recommend approval of anything
that would increase the operation at this site. Mr. Pearson felt it would be rewarding poor behavior,
poor relationships with neighbors and poor upkeep of the property to allow expansion.
Cit of Maplewood
Official Si Sheet
B puttin y our name and address on this sheet, y ou are re to address the
Maplewood Cit Council on the followin topic for up to five minutes.
Name (first & last) - please print
2 owl,
3.
4 . l�D�'S �i-�c v ,e
�/ L/C.�Ue �i�t�Cc�S�
6. �CCS/�' IL
7 zGiLIN ��i
8
9
1010
11.
12.
13.
14.
Address
_Tz II D 7o �U� 1'_ YI)�' S� 1,q u
L A-
54
�z
PP,
Vr
' 1,0 ..A 1Z
wm�,
AGIMA IrM N04
3,,,.,,,
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT Highpoint Ridge
LOCATION: South of County Road D, west of Highway 61
DATE: June 30, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Action by Council
Da m 00
Bmoraaa
Mo�frd
R�erMd
Mr. Frank Frattalone, representing Frattalone Excavating, is .proposing to develop a residential
planned unit development (PUD) called Highpoint Ridge. It would be on a 45 -acre site on the
south side of County Road D, west of Highway 61. (Please see the maps starting on page 20.)
Requests
To build this project, Mr. Frattalone is requesting several city approvals including:
1. Changes to the comprehensive plan. These would be from R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S
(single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium
density) for the site. (See the existing and proposed land use maps on pages 21 and 22.)
The developer also is proposing that the city drop the planned minor collector street that
would go through the site from County Road D on the north to Highway 61 on the east.
2. A conditional. use permit (CUP) for a planned . unit devel PUD for a 222 -unit
housing development. The applicant is requesting -the CUSP' because the existing -F (farm
residence), R -1 (single dwellings), RAS (single dwellings - small lot) and M -1 (light
manufacturing) zoning districts limit the uses to single dwellings in a typical or standard
subdivision or to commercial uses near Highway 61 in the M -1 zone. (See the property
line /zoning map on page 23.) As proposed, this project would have 28 single dwellings, 72
town houses and 122 -units of apartments. Having a PUD gives the city and developer a
chance to be more flexible with site design and development details than the standard
zoning requirements would normally allow. The existing F and M -1 zoning districts on the
site also do not allow twin homes, town houses or other multiple dwellings.
3. A preliminary plat to create the lots in the development. (See the enclosed maps on pages
24 through 27 and the enclosed project plans.)
4. Having no parking for one side of private streets and driveways.
BACKGROUND
Carey Addition
On July 13, 1998, the city council made several approvals for the Carey Addition. These included a
land use plan change and a zoning map change from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1 S (single
dwellin s -small lot for t -
g } he north one-half of the plat and approval of the revised preliminary plat.
This proposal was for the property along Carey Heights Drive, south of County Road D. The p lat
approval was subject to nine conditions.
Mining Permit
June 14, 1999: The City Council approved a revision to the mining operation conditional use p ermit
to allow the operation to continue until December 1, 2001.
DISCUSSION
Land Use Plan Changes
To build the proposed plat, Mr. Frattalone wants the city to change the land use plan for the site.
These changes would be from R -1 (single dwelling residential), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot)
and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) for the site. (See the existing
and proposed land use maps on pages 21 and 22.)
The city intends R -3(M) areas for a variety of housing including single dwellings, town houses or
apartments of up to six units per gross acre. For R -1 areas, the city intends to have primarily g
sin le
.
dwellings on 10,000 square -foot lots with a density of up to 4.1 units per gross acre. The ci
intends -
R 1(S) areas for small - �
lot (7,500 square -foot) single dwellings. For M -1 areas, the city
plans for offices, clinics, day care centers, retail businesses, warehousing and light manufacturing
operations. The developer also is proposing that the city drop the planned minor collector street
that would go through the site to connect County Road D on the north with Highway 61 on the
east.
Land use plan changes do not require specific findings for approval. Any change, however, should
be consistent with the city's land use goals and policies. There are several g oals in the
Comprehensive Plan that apply to this request. Specifically, the land use Ian has eleven general
p g
land use goals. Of these, three apply to this proposal including:
• Provide=for crderly development.
i
• Minimize conflicts between land uses.
• Provide a wide variety of housing types.
The land use plan also has several general development and residential development policies that
relate to this project. They include:
• Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative
economic, social or physical impact on adjoining developments.
• Whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar uses front on the
same street or at borders of areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers.
• The city supports the improvement, replacement or redevelopment of substandard or
incompatible development.
• The city coordinates land use changes with the character of each neighborhood.
• Include a variety of housing types for all residents ... including apartments, town houses,
manufactured homes, single - family housing, public- assisted housing, low- and moderate -
income housing, and rental and owner - occupied housing.
2
Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate
uate
buffering and separation.
The housing plan also has policies about housing diversity and quality that the city should
consider with this development. They are:
Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the city. These are
to meet the life-cycle need Y
y s of all income levels, those with special needs and nontraditional
households.
The city will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and
price ranges through its land use plan.
This is a good site for a mix of housing styles and densities. It is on a major arterial street
(Highway 61) and close to a minor collector street (Walter Street/Beam Avenue). The project
should be a good neighbor to the nearby homes. There would be single dwellings near most of
the existing single dwellings and the proposed town houses would be a transitional land use
between single dwellings and the proposed apartments near Highway 61. The city's long -term
stability of its tax base depends upon its ability to attract and keep residents of all ages. To do so,
the city must insure that a diverse mix of housing styles is available in each stage of the life cycle
of housing needs.
One advantage of this proposal is that an area that the city once thought would be good for
commercial or light industrial development would become residential. This should be beneficial to
the existing nearby residential properties. Having single dwellings near the existing residences
..should be better neighbors than the mining operation, the commercial or a manufacturin g use that.
t
the existing .land use and zoning designations would allow. The proposed apartment site also
would not p p
o be a, :great site for a commercial or retail business- It. is too far away from and hidden
from the main drive lanes of the highway to make "it des.irable for a commercial or retail
:
In fact, #here is an area of large trees between the frontage road and the -hi hwa that screen the
g Y
apartment site from the highway. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT),
however, is concerned that traffic noise in the area could exceed established noise standards for
residential uses. (Please see the letter from Paul Czech of MnDOT on pages 33 and 34.
In response to neighbor concerns, the developer's engineer changed the PUD by dropping the
proposed Lydia Avenue connection between the proposed townhouses and the proposed single
dwellings along Duluth Street. (See the site plan and preliminary plat date- stamped June 30, 2000
on pages 24 and 25.) This new design means there would not be a street connection through this
development between Highway 61 and the proposed and existing single dwellings. In fact, the
proposed townhouses and apartments will only have street access to the proposed Lydia Avenue
and the existing frontage road.
As proposed, the 222 units on the 45 -acre site means there would be an average of 5.0 units p er
gross acre. The proposed overall development density would be consistent with Maplewood's
medium density standards and with the density standards recommended by the Metropolitan
Council for housing n first-ring p
g g suburbs. That is, they want to see residential development with at
least three units per gross acre.
Collector Street
As I noted earlier, the developer is proposing that the city drop a planned minor collector street
from the land use plan. This street would have connected County Road D with Highway 61. After
9 Y
reviewing the area, the developer determined that this street would not have worked well with the
3
site topography, the powerlines and pipelines near the center of the site nor with the existin g and
proposed street pattern.
The existing land use plan shows Highway 61 as a major arterial street and Walter Street/Beam
Avenue as a collector street. These streets are designed and built to carry larger volumes of traffic
than the local or neighborhood streets. The proposed PUD has Lydia Avenue intersecting with
Highway 61 at the southeast corner of the site. (See the proposed intersection detail on page 30.)
This street layout would direct all the tragic from the townhouses and apartments in this
development onto the frontage road and highway (an arterial street) and not onto the local or
neighborhood streets.
Conditional Use Permit
The applicant has applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development
(PUD) for the 222 -unit housing development. They are requesting the CUP. because the existing F
(farm residential) and M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning designations limit the land uses to single
dwellings and commercial (near the highway). As proposed, there would be a mix of single - family
homes, town houses and apartments in the PUD. The developer intends to sell all the lots for the
single dwellings and town houses while the apartments would be for rent.
As proposed, the 222 dwelling units would be on about 44.5 acres for an overall project density of
5.0 units per acre. For a comparison, the comprehensive plan allows developments with single
dwellings to have up to 4.1 units per gross acre. As such, on a 44.5 acre site, there could be u p to
178 single - family homes.
Preliminary Plat
Density and Lot Size
s
Asz proposed, the single- family, Tots range from 15. 000 uare feet to 42 481 square feet wit h a
q q n
average lot size of about 21,200 square feet. The city requires each lot in the R - 1 sin le dwellin
( 9 g)
zoning district to have at least 75 feet of frontage and have at least 10,000 square feet. All of the
proposed single dwelling lots would meet or exceed the city's R -1 zoning standards.
Block 3 on the north part of the site would have 36 town houses on about 12.8 acres (2.8 units per
acre). These units would be on their own 28- foot -wide private cul -de -sac that would provide
vehicle access to and from County Road D for these town houses.
Public Utilities
There are sanitary sewer and water in Carey Heights Drive, Duluth Street and County Road D to
serve the proposed development. The developer will extend the water main from the north end of
Carey Heights Drive and Duluth Street and from near Walter Street along the south side of County
Road D into and through the site. The Saint Paul Water Utility will need to approve the water plan.
Trees
As proposed, the contractor for Mr. Frattalone would grade almost the entire site to create the
street right -of -ways, the proposed ponds and the house pads. This grading would remove about
121 large trees on the 45 -acre site. (See the tree inventory plan on page 28.)
Maplewood's tree ordinance requires the developer to replace each large tree that the contractor
would remove with two new trees. As such, the developer will need to plant at least 242 trees
4
within the project site to replace the removed trees. The developer has prepared a plan for the tree
planting (see the proposed plan on page 29.)
There are several problems with the proposed plan, however. Tree planting in the front yards of
the single - dwellings is difficult, if not impossible, to coordinate with the home construction. If the
contractor puts the trees in before the homes, then they often end up in the way of the driveway or
the utilities. Putting the tree in after the contractor has finished the house requires much
coordination with the homeowner and their landscaping.
As an alternative, staff recommends that the developer revise the proposed tree planting plan to
bunch the new trees together in groups. These planting areas should be around the pondin g areas
and along the common property lines between residences. There also could be trees along ll of
the proposed trails not just al • • g p p along the trail between Block One and Block Three. In addition, the
revised plan must show the developer planting at least 242 trees after the site grading is done.
Trails
The developer's plans show three walking paths in the Aevelopment. These include a path along
the north side of the lots on Carey Heights Drive (under the power lines), between Lots 4 and 5,
Block One (connecting Carey Heights Drive and the trail under the power lines) and a path from
the north cul -de -sac (Block 3) to the west toward the city park. (These are shown on the site p Ian
on page 25.) To prevent any confusion about ownership and property rights for trails, the count
recommends that the city have the developer locate the trail in a right -of -way on the plat. The west
end of the proposed trail in Block 3 however, needs to be changed or moved. As proposed, it
would run into the rear part of the privately -owned property to the west of the project site. This trail
should connect to the proposed east/west trail that would be under the power lines by movin g the
west end of the trail or by moving the trail to the east between Lots 8 and 9.
For paved off - street paths, Maplewood. requires 8- foot -wide bituminous aths`-centered i
p n a right
of -way that is at least. 10 feet wider than the trail.As such, the trailwa Y for the ,trail b_ etween .Lot s4
and 5, Block 1 and in Block 3 need to be at least 18 feet wide to meet this code re q u r The
developer should build a two -rail split rail fence on both sides of each paved trail within this plat.
The city should require the developer to install the trails and fences with the street and before final
plat approval. This is to ensure that the lot buyers know that the trail is there.
Drainage - Watershed District
Most of the site drains to the south and east toward Highway 61 and to the pond behind LaMett 's
Body Shop. A concern of several neighbors with this proposal is storm water drainage. The
developer's engineer told me that by using the proposed and existing ponds as storm water
detention facilities, the development will not increase the rate of storm water runoff from the site.
That is, the runoff leaving the site will be at or below current levels.
The RamseyNVashington Metro Watershed District has been working with the developer on the
proposed project plans. Mr. Frattalone or the contractor must get a permit from the watershed
district before starting grading or construction.
Dedications
Dan Solar, the Ramsey County traffic engineer, said that the applicant should dedicate ten
additional feet of right -of -way along County Road D. This is because the Ramsey Count right-of-
Y 9
way plan requires a total right -of -way width of 86 feet (43 feet on each side) for County Road D.
5
On- Street Parking Standards
The applicant is proposing street widths from 28 feet to 32 feet in the development. I had the Fire
Chief and Fire Marshall review the proposed streets and their widths. According to Article 9,
Section 902 of the Uniform Fire Code, all fire access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not
less than 20 feet. As such, the 28- foot -wide streets may have parking on one side of the street and
the 32- foot -wide streets may have parking on either side of the street.
COMMISSION ACTION
On June 19, 2000, the planning commission held a public hearing about this proposal. The
commission recommended that the M -1 (light manufacturing) area near the frontage road remain
and that the city approve the rest of the proposed PUD west of the existing M -1 area.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Approve the resolution on page 35. This resolution changes the land use plan for the
Highpoint Ridge residential development, south of County Road D, west of Highway 61.
These changes are from R -1 (single dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1
(light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) for the site. This resolution also
drops the planned minor collector street between County Road D and Highway 61. The city is
making these changes because:
1. The development would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive
plan.
2. The town house and apartment sites in the development are proper for and consistent
with the city's policies for medium and high - density residential `uses. These include:
a. Creating a tr g p ansitional.la use�between the existing and- oposed low density
residential and commercial land uses.
b. It is on an arterial street and is near a collector street.
3. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because:
a. The proposed single dwellings will separate the proposed town houses and apartments
from existing homes.
b. There should be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing local
residential streets. The proposed street pattern keeps the town house and apartment
traffic separate from the proposed and existing single dwellings.
4. Neither the city or the developer plan to build the proposed collector street between
County Road D and Highway 61 because of the existing and proposed grades, the
existing power lines and the existing pipelines makes it difficult to build a street in this
area.
B. Approve the resolution starting on page 36. This resolution approves a conditional use
permit for a planned unit development for the Highpoint Ridge housing development. The city
bases this approval on the findings required by code. (Refer to the resolution for the specific
findings.) Approval is subject to the following conditions:
0
1. All construction shall follow the site plan and preliminary plat date- stamped June 30,
2000, except where the city requires changes. The developer shall revise the grading,
g
utility, tree planting and other project and construction plans to follow the site plan and
preliminary plat dated June 30, 2000. The city council may approve major changes.
The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3.* Have include: city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, trails, tree and driveway
and parking lot plans.
4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The
developer shall give the city an:-easement for this .pond and shall be responsible for
getting any needed off -site pond and drainage easements.
5. The developer or contractor shall:
a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public
improvements and meet all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Remove the debris, junk, garbage and travel trailers from the site.
6. This approval does not include the final design approval for the duplexes, townhomes or
for the apartment buildings. The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping
and site, plans for these to the community design review board (ODRB) for approval by
the CDRB.
7. The city shall not issue any building permits for construction on an outlot (per city code
requirements). The developer must record a final plat to create buildable lots for any
outlot in the preliminary plat before the city will issue a building permit.
8. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
C. Approve the Highpoint Ridge preliminary plat (received by the city on June 30, 2000). The
developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat:
1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and
meet all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Have NSP install Group V rate street lights in at least nine locations - primarily at
street intersections and street curves. The exact style and location shall be subject to
the city engineers approval.
d. Pay the city for the cost of traffic - control, street identification and no parkin signs.
ns. 9
7
e. Provide all required and necessary easements.
f. Demolish or remove the existing house and garage at 1170 County Road D, and all
other buildings, scrap metal, debris and junk from the site.
g. Cap and seal all wells on site that the owners are not using; remove septic systems
or drainfields, subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines. Within one year of the
contractor installing the sanitary sewer, the owners of the existing houses on Carey
Heights Drive shall connect their houses to the sanitary sewer.
h. Complete all the curb and gutter on Duluth Street and on Carey Heights Drive on the
south side of the site. This is to replace the temporary cul -de -sac, repair the cul -de-
sac pavement and restore and sod the boulevards.
i. For the trails, complete the following:
(1) Construct an eight- foot -wide paved walkway and two -rail split -rail fencing
between Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, between the street and the proposed
east/west trail in Block 3, and along the north side of the lots in Block One (in
the easement area) as shown on the plat date- stamped June 30, 2000. The
developer shall extend the west end of the trail in Lot 3, Block One into the
city park to connect to the existing park trail. All trails between lots shall be
in a 18- foot -wide trailway or pedestrian way or in easement areas.
(2) The developer shall install atwo -rail split -rail fence on both sides of each trail
and posts at the end of the trails to prevent motorized vehicles from using the
trail
(.3) `The developer shall build the trails and fencing with the streets.
(4) The city engineer must approve these plans
j. Install signs where the driveways for the twin homes and for the town houses
intersect the public streets indicating that they are private driveways.
2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall be revised to follow the site plan and preliminary plat dated June 30, 2000, and
shall include the grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail, sidewalk and street
plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code.
b. The grading plan shall show:
(1) The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home
site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat.
(2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
(3) House pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save
large trees.
(4) The proposed street and trail grades as allowed by the city engineer.
(5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall
approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes
steeper than 3:1. On slopes steeper than 3:1, the developer shall prepare
and implement a stabilization and planting plan. At a minimum, the slopes
shall be protected with wood fiber blanket, be seeded with a no maintenance
vegetation and be stabilized before the city approves the final plat.
(6) All retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a
building permit from the city.
(7) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the
city engineer.
(8) No grading beyond the plat boundary without temporary grading easements
from the affected property owner(s).
(9) A minimum of a 10- foot -wide, 10:1 bench below the normal water elevation
(NWL) of any pond designed to be a wet pond. The depth of the pond below
the NWL shall not exceed four feet.
C.* The tree plan shall:
(1) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or final plat approval.
(2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan
shall include an inventory of .all existing large trees on the site.
(3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous '
trees shall be at least (2,, %
two - and one.. ) inches in diameter and shall be
a mix of red and white oaks, ash, lindens and sugar maples. The coniferous
trees shall be at least eight (8) feet tall and shalt be a mix of Austrian pine
and other species.
(4) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
(5) Include for city staff a detailed planting plan and material list.
(6) Be revised to group the new trees together. These planting areas shall be
around the ponding areas, on the steep slopes, along the common property
lines between residences and along all of the proposed trams. The developer
may use the tree groupings to separate the different types of residences.
(7) Show the planting of at least 242 trees after the site grading is done.
d. The street, trail and utility plans shall show:
(1) Paved walkways and two-rail split -rail fences in a trailway or pedestrian way
as shown on the proposed plans. This shall include the trail between Lots 4
and 5, Block 1, in Block 3 (as revised), between Block 1 and Block 3 (under
the power lines), connecting to the existing park trail to the west of the site
and on the east side of English Lane (Ridge Lane) to connect to the proposed
0
apartment site. The parks and recreation director shall approve their locations
and design.
(2) The public streets shall be a 9 -ton design with a maximum street grade of
eight percent and the maximum street grade within 75 feet of all intersections
at two percent.
(3) All the streets, parking areas and driveways with continuous concrete curb
and gutter.
(4) All public street right -of -ways shall be at least 60 -feet -wide.
(5) The completion of the curb and gutter on the north end of Duluth Street and
the existing Carey Heights Drive cul -de -sac, the repair or replacement of the
cul -de -sac pavement and the restoration and sodding of the boulevards
around the cul -de -sac.
(6) A connection between the proposed water main in Block 3 and the proposed
water main system on the southerly part of the plat. The developer also shall
make a connection between the proposed water main on Lydia Avenue at
Highway 61 and the existing water main on the west side of Highway 61,
south of Guldens.
(7) The coordination of the water main alignments and sizing with the standards
and requirements of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS).
Available ire flow analysis shall be determined for the water system at the
proposed apartment complex as well as through the existing 8 -inch and 12-
inch crossings. of Highway 61 at Beam Avenue. Fire flow requirements shall
be verified with the Maplewood. Fire Department.
(8) All utility excavations located within the proposed right -of: ways or within
easements. The developer shall acquire easements for all utilities that would
be outside the project area.
(9) A reduced number of sanitary and storm sewer manholes and water main
bends by "cutting corners" with the utility alignments. The developer's
engineer shall verify with the SPRWS the acceptable water main alignments
and crossings. Manholes may be offset from the street centerline if the result
lessens the number of structures.
(10) Provisions for public utilities and service(s) to the vacant or undeveloped
properties on the south side of the proposed Lydia Avenue.
e. The drainage plan shall ensure that there is no increase in the rate of storm water
run -off leaving the site above the current (predevelopment) levels.
3. Change the plat as follows:
a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer.
b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These
easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet
wide along the side property lines.
W
c. Revise the lot lines in Block One and Block Three so there is a 18- foot -wide trail or
pedestrian way between Lots 4 and 5, Block One and between Lots 6 and 7 or
between Lots 8 and 9, Block Three to accommodate the proposed trails.
d. Show the existing pipeline and the NSP and pipeline easements on the final plat.
e. Show all public street right -of -ways at 60 feet wide.
f. Make as many of the property lines as is reasonably possible radial to the cul -de-
sacs or perpendicular to the street right -of -ways.
g. If necessary, increase the lot widths for the lots next to the pipeline to ensure that the
house pads will be at least 100 feet away from the pipeline. (code requirement)
h. Change the street names as follows:
1. Carey Heights Drive shall be used only in Block 2 (Phase One) of the project.
The north /south street between Outlot A and Outlot B shall be Duluth Street.
2. Highpoint Court shall be called Ridge Place.
3. English Lane shall be called Ridge Lane.
4. The cul -de -sac in Block 3 shall be called Highridge Court.
i. Show the extra ten -feet of street right -of -way for County Road D.
4. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including:
a. Any off -site drainage and ' utility easements.
b. Any necessary easements for the dedication and construction of Lydia Avenue.
5. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site
drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that
the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval.
6. Record the following with the final plat:
a. All homeowners association documents.
b. A deed restriction prohibiting the construction of a dwelling or its attachments within
100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline. This affects Lots 3 through 6, Block 1 and
Lots 7 through 18, Block 3 of the proposed preliminary plat the city received on June
30, 2000. The developer also shall notify the purchasers of the pipeline location.
c. A deed dedicating 10 feet of additional right -of -way along County Road D for future
street widening with the final plat. The applicant shall submit the language for this
dedication to the city for approval before recording.
d. A covenant or deed restriction with the final plat that prohibits the driveways on
Lots 1, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 36, Block 3 from going onto County Road D.
11
e. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision or splitting of the
lots .or parcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless approved
by the city council.
The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the
city for approval before recording.
7. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading.
8. The owners of the properties at 1174 and 1176 County Road D shall change the
addresses of their properties to Carey Heights Drive addresses within 30 days of the
contractor installing the base bituminous course for the new public street in front of their
homes.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of
community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit
or approves the final plat.
D. Adopt the resolution on page 39. This resolution is for the on- street parking standards and
no on- street parking requirements for the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D and
west of Highway 61.
12
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
surveyed the owners of the 70 properties within 350 feet of this site and received 15 written
replies. Of those who replied, 14 were against the project (primarily the apartments) and one was
for the proposed plan. (Note: These comments were in response to the developers first proposal.
The developer changed the proposed preliminary plat and site plan by dropping the Lydia Avenue
street connection through the site after the planning commission meeting. This change was in
response to neighbors concerns.)
1. We are very much opposed to the apartment complex - It is currently zoned commercial and
the expectation of people who bought into this neighborhood is that it would remain
commercial property. It would be unfair to add (potentially) 244+ people and cars to Duluth
Street to access an apartment building. We bought into asingle- dwelling neighborhood -the
traffic would be brutal to the., current. residents. It is also not fair to place apartments (with 20
percent low income housing) in such close proximity to higher income dwellings, where
people have paid to be here. (Bradt -1236 Summit Court)
2. 1 am strongly opposed to the development plan including apartments. Single family homes
and moderately priced town homes OK. I think the future home owners of this new
development would not appreciate apartment buildings next to their property as do I. This
will reduce property values, increase traffic in areas which will not be able to handle the
abundance of cars. There is also no way for this traffic to go north from this plan, except to
use Duluth, my road to Summit. I do not wish to have my property and street used as a turn
around - this is very dangerous for kids!! I also foresee longer bus rides for our kids. This is
a single home area - lets keep it that way and not degrade the_neighborhood. (Johnson -
1216 Summit Co
3. We like these plans with the exception of the 122 -unit apartment complex! This will
depreciate the value of the homes in the nei hborhood. , This nei hborhood is n
g . g of low to
moderate income housing! The apartment complex will produce heavy traffic on Duluth
Street - this poses a serious safety hazard for the many small children who play in the
neighborhood! The people who now live in this neighborhood payed to dollar for the'
9 p Y p it lots
and homes. We also pay high taxes! To mix an apartment complex with $350,000+ homes
makes no sense. The 122 units will create 200+ additional cars driving up and down Duluth
Street on a daily basis! (Jurgens -1225 Summit Court)
4. We strongly oppose the 122 -unit apartment complex and twin -home in the new ro osal.
p p
We want an alternative solution for connecting Duluth Street to the new Lydia Avenue.
t the � y
g e proposed layout, the new residences would have to go to Highway 61 north
via Beam Avenue. There are small children waiting or school buses on Duluth
g Street. We
do not want any unsafe conditions to the children because of this heavy traffic. It would be
better for the new residences to exit directly to Highway 61 north and south b using the
Y g
unconnected Lydia Avenue or using County Road D. (Nguyen -1226 Summit Court)
5. 1 am very concerned with having apartment buildings in this immediate area because crime
usually comes with them. Our homes are prime targets especially since they are more costly
than many nearby. I do not favor apartments built here by Frattalone. (Osell - 2970 Duluth
St.)
6. The connection between Carey Heights and Duluth makes good sense - be sure to allow
path easement through 1 or 2 yards on cul -de -sac to connect to park path under p ower lines.
13
The duplexes /town houses also are priced accordingly to neighborhood and would be a
good fit with County Road D housing. No access through our neighborhood. The apartment
complex is not a good fit. Typically apartment dwellers have 2 cars per unit. That is 244 cars
extra on Duluth /Carey Heights loop depending on drivers destination (south to connect to
light and go north or out back entrance to head west on County Road D). Also renters
usually do not have the stability of homeowners or town house owners. Many negative
statistics are relative to apartment complexes. We already have a large saturation of
apartments on County Road D (in Vadnais Heights) to meet the quota of balance between
housing of single and multiple ratios. Please do not add anymore apartment complexes.
(Esch - 2993 Carey Heights Drive)
7. We object to Carey Heights Drive connecting to this new development. We already have two
openings to this development. Carey Heights Drive is an independent street and we do not
-want it connected to High Point Ridge. (DeYoungs - 2964 Carey Heights Drive)
8. We feel the larger "horse shoe" of single family homes is a welcome, positive and well
planned addition to our neighborhood. Even the town homes by Masterpiece are well done.
The one objection we have would be the apartments - since there already are so many on
the north side of County Road D. (Schroeder - 3007 Frank Street)
110
As far as the city of Maplewood should be concerned, the welfare of its residents should
come before personal interest of private enterprises. The city should demand that the
original plan of building single family homes must be maintained to assure that the value and
appearance of the neighborhood is maintained. When we built our homes in the 1990's,
developers like Frattalone and Mogrens assured us that this area will have single family
Y
homes in the 2,000 square -foot- plus range. Since then, we have already witnessed that
both parties did not keep their promise and allowed smaller homes to be built. The only line
of defense, for the - residents is the Mayor and the: - city -�cou nci 1. We are now relying on you to
Y J Y
.assure,�apartment buildings are not built in this area. The informational 'meetin already
Y
indicated to us that °:they plan to rent apartments to low: and moderate income eo le. This
p p
is an invitation to increase crime in our area. The city council must reject this proposal in the
best interests of its residents. (Pohlkamp - 2990 Edward Street)
10. Keep the bottom -right "leg" of the project zoned commercial since commercial use already in
place north and south of it. A large apartment complex would double the traffic in the
neighborhood (Kohiman Lake Overlook) since 120+ units about the same as the number of
homes in place right now. Traffic use design not set to handle this amount. A more logical
place for apartment expansion in the area is along County Road D between White Bear
Avenue and Beam Avenue. There are several spots open along 1 -694 in this area. To me the
apartment complex does not fit into the planning "flow." Down the hill right now it goes
single - family homes down to businesses next to Highway 61. One could put in a row of town
homes to soften the transition. We already have several apartments in the immediate area
on County Road D, west of Highway 61, off 1 -694. Do not see the need for another at this
location.
Use wildflower mix for seeding non - mowable slopes on the grading plan. (Put a) Small tot
park down by the pond in the Outlot B area. Does not seem unreasonable to make this
modification since every inch right now is being carved out for residential sale. Why not
make a small concession to meet the needs of the new neighbors? Policy of replacing
removed trees. Obviously most, if not all, trees will be taken out by major grading effort. Be
nice if new trees could be chosen from native varieties - more oak and less green ash. I like
the cul -de -sac for the 36 unit townhome complex - nice design! Since the turn around is
14
already in place at the end of Carey Heights Drive now, keep this expanded out and put in a
center boulevard of trees to slow traffic coming down. Nice to do at the end of Duluth Street
too. (Huntley - 3020 Edward St.)
11. I am opposed to the 122 multi- housing medium - density (apartments). I don't think it would be
a good location. Too many occupants and the danger of overbuilding. Also opposed to the
light manufacturing in a residential area. The noise factor was not addressed adequately.
Please look more closely at natural sound barriers. Also opposed to additional town houses
in Outlot D (24 units). Do you do any environmental impact studies? This whole development
seems to be an overload on the land involved. I am also concerned about the road access
during construction. We live at 1176 County Road D and the entire road access will be
affected. (Owner -1176 County Road D)
12. We are strongly opposed to any type of apartment complex in this development. Secondly,
we are concerned about the increase in traffic which maybe a result of such high density
housing. We would sympathize with the thought and feelings of our neighbors who are
directly affected by this proposal (those on Summit Court - on the north side and the homes
directly at the end of Duluth Street). (Herold -1247 Countryview Circle)
13. Looks like a well thought out plan and layout to me. (Rosell - Stillwater)
Also see the letters on pages 31 and 32.
15
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 45 acres
Existing land use: A mining operation and accessory buildings from the former farm
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Houses and apartments across County Road D in Vadnais Heights
South: Houses on Carey Heights Drive, Duluth Street, Summit Court and Gulden's
West: Houses on Carey Heights Drive, Frank Street and Maplewood city park
East: Highway 61 and frontage road
PAST ACTIONS - Carey Heights Drive and Carey Addition
1. June 1964: The village council approved a preliminary plat for this area.
2. 8- 13 -64: A second preliminary plat was approved by the council. Council also approved a
building permit for Mr. Carey at 1174 County Road D, subject to an agreement between
himself and the village that he will not request any village maintenance on his private
driveway, nor will he object to the construction of, and assessment for, a standard village
street in the future.
3. 10- 21 -66: The city issued a building permit to Richard Barrett at 1176 E. County Road D.
4. 11 -9 -66: Richard Barrett signed an agreement waiving his right to a village street or
maintenance of the private drive to his property and agreed to construct and maintain a
private drive to his property.
5. 11- 10 -66: The village engineer reported to the council that the private drive did not meet
village street standards and was not constructed to approved p lans. Council authorized a
building permit to be issued to Mr. Barrett subject to Mr. Barrett complying with the
conditions in the engineer's report.
6. 11- 17 -66: The planning commission recommended approval of a preliminary plat for
Richard Barrett consisting of four lots on the west side of Carey Heights Drive and the half
streets required by council action of 11- 10 -66.
7. 11- 17 -66: Council approved a preliminary plat for the Carey Addition. This plat comprised
only part of the Carey property including right -of -way for Carey Heights Drive, Woodlynn
Avenue and Lydia Avenue.
8. 4 -4 -77: The planning commission recommended that the council table consideration of
variances requested by Mr. Novak (build on a substandard lot, without frontage to a
dedicated public street) to allow the applicant an opportunity to pursue the matter of
dedication of the right -of -way (Carey Heights Drive) and pursuing a variance to standards of
street and utility construction.
9. 9 -1 -77: Mr. Carey petitioned the city to improve Carey Heights Drive from County Road D
southward approximately 1,500 feet.
16
10. 9- 28 -77: Council ordered a feasibility study for the improvement of Carey Heights Drive with
public street and utilities. The study showed that the project would be cost - prohibitive.
11. 1- 26 -78: Council approved a lot area variance but denied two street access variances as
requested by Mr. Richard Novak, based on the following findings:
1. The street access variances do not meet the "spirit and intent" of the ordinance.
2. A precedent would be set for similar lots in other areas of the city.
3. There may be times of the year when emergency services could not get access to the
property.
4. There is no hardship that is "unique to the individual rop e rtY under consideration."
p
12. On April 20, 1978, city staff recommended that the council declare the Carey Heights Drive
improvement project not feasible and go no further with the project. Council tabled
consideration to allow Mr. Carey "to contact his own source in regard to providing utilities on
Carey Heights Drive."
13. On December 18, 1980, the city council approved a lot split request of Aaron Rupert to
create a 13,500 square -foot lot on the east side of the private Carey Heights Drive.
Mr. Rupert, however, never created the lot as approved by the city council.
14. On October 26, 1987, the council initiated a public improvement project for the construction
p p 1 ton
of Carey Heights Drive, between Kohiman Lake Overlook plat and County Road D.
15 On February 27, 1989, the council held a:. , ublic hearing about buidrn Care: '
p g a ey Heights Drive
from Kohiman Lake Overlook development to County Road D. At this hearing; the' council
decided that the project was advisable, expedient and necessary and ordered the city
engineer to prepare the plans for the project. However, the affected property owners did not
want to provide the necessary public street right -of -way to the city. As such, the city never
built the project.
16. On May 27, 1997, the city council considered the Carey Addition preliminary plat. The
council tabled action on the plat until June 9, 1997 so the applicant and city staff could
research four items. These included the:
1. Location of the pipeline and the proposed lot layout.
2. Need for a variance for lots that would be less than 10,000 square feet in area.
3. Possibility of adding traffic calming features and signage with the plat.
4. Possibility of adding stop signs to intersection of Carey Heights Drive and Frank Street.
17. On June 9, 1997, the council again considered the proposed plat. The council tabled action
on the plat until June 23 or July 14, 1997.
Frattalone Mining Operation
June 28, 1982: The City Council approved a conditional use permit and three variances to mine this
site. The CUP was subject to nine conditions.
July 25, 1983: The Council renewed the permit for five years, subject to the original conditions.
17
October 10, 1988, and October 20, 1989: The Council renewed the permit for one year, subject to the
original conditions.
October 22, 1990: The Council renewed the permit for three years, subject to the original conditions.
March 25,1991: The Council denied a permit change to add a material crushing /recyclin g operation
eration
to this site.
January 10, 1994: The Council revised the conditions of approval for the permit and renewed the
mining approval for five more years. A condition of this approval was that the permit would end in five
years (in January 1999).
PLANNING
Existing Land Use Plan designations: R -1 (single dwellings) and M -1 (light manufacturing)
Existing Zoning: F (farm residence) and M -1 (light manufacturing)
Proposed Land Use Plan designation: R -3(M) (residential medium density)
Reasons for the Requests
This proposal needs a land use plan change because:
1. State law does not allow a city to adopt any regulation that conflicts with its comprehensive p Ian
2. One of the findings required by code for a CUP is that the use is in conformity with the city's
comprehensive plan.
The land use plan shows this site for._ R -1 and M -1 uses which do not include mul
t ple family housing.
The developer is appg tyin for a CUP because the zonin On this i s site � is F (farm residence) crud M-1
g
(light manufacturing). The F zoning allows farms and single dwellings and the M -1 zoning allows for
a variety of commercial and light manufacturing land uses. The developer chose to apply for a CUP
rather than a zone change. A • � Y •
g CUP for a PUD is only for a specific use and site plan. A rezoning to
R -1 (single dwellings) and to R -3 (multiple dwelling residential) would allow a variety of single
dwellings and a variety of multiple - dwelling uses and plans.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
There are no specific criteria for a land use plan change. Any land use plan change should be
consistent with the goals and policies in the city's comprehensive plan.
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards.
Refer to the findings in the resolution on pages 36 through 38.
Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve
plans:
pp
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neig hboring,
g g,
existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability f
investment or occupation i � Y
p n the neighborhood, that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use
and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create
traffic hazards or congestion.
18
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the
surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive
development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan.
p
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good
composition, materials, textures and colors.
kr /p: /sec4 /h ighpont. mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Land Use Plan Map (Existing)
3. Land Use Plan Map (Proposed)
4. Property Line /Zoning Map
5. Proposed Preliminary Plat date - stamped June 30, 2000
6. Proposed Site Plan date - stamped June 30, 2000.
7. Proposed Grading Plan
8. Proposed Utility Plan
9. Tree Inventory Plan
10. Proposed Tree Plan
11. Proposed Intersection Detail
12. 5 -21 -00 letter from Jorgenson (1235 Summit Court)
13. 5 -23 -00 letter from Lambert (2986 Duluth Street)
14. 6 -16 -00 letter from Czech (MnDOT)
15. Land Use Plan Change Resolution (R -1, R -1(S) and M -1 to R -3(M))
16. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Resolution
17. No Parking Resolution
18. .Project Plans (separate attachments - including 11 x1 7s and full- size)
W&J,
Attachment I
r;
0 k4t 0 0.
qr-!�N 0-zzoo;
1. Sumk#T CT*
2. COLWTRYftV CIL
0ULU7H Cr*
4. LYDIA AVL
KM 1
ti
tom'
AVE 9 Rib- AVE S
'woo °� AVE t caws �
vac dt.
� VNfRI� OR. , � ! � � AVE — ��-��� � �C
< t i al�r�iew L"iE AIL AW.
CT. LELAW �110N AYE � � 8 um
B s
part
CHAMMM ST AVE AW.. MJRKE/
AV
ELDR NW AVE.
LK
INK. �BE1Mt1lif AVE
ME
LOCATION MAP
20
4
N
Attachment 2
Ve dnei
County Rd. C
// interchange
minor collector
l�
mi nor
Beam Ave.
i co llector
T
ti
C
4•+
J
i
V
G)
go
1 - 1
01
E
r
r tV Rd. C
R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS
R -3(M) = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
OS = OPEN SPACE
M -1 = LIGHT MANUFACTURING
Gerval$
PROJECT SITE
LAND USE MAP
(EXISTING)
21
4
N
Attachment 3
County Rd. 0
J
Little Canada
01 14
Va H e ights
694 Mr.c _ ria,i
interchange
M M f
'O
R=3 Ir
R -1
goo
U .
E , �!
M I
:. M or
Beam A vv.
C. 0I19clor
0.s
1 -
� � r
Gervais
LAND USE MAP
(PROPOSED)
22
4
N
Attachment 4
VADNAIS HEIGHTS
OAD
,4.. _ - . - __ COUNTY ROAD D -- - -�,:� _ .. �M .... ._ _ t%j
a tyu 490.6• st , • i f... ! i r
CO
CM !I d ooms
fG3) !" N IN i° N 1 320 Ir t"� r N
U �- VMS 1322 ;
.:, 3110
• 7 PROJECT SITE °
S 5
3090
�5 bdt •j , N P
1.
FA( , `.
. v `
.. ' �jCO
o�
- - v
s.P. Tww. I PIPELINES _-j•'7l• -
. 1
-- - - - - -, NSP POWER LINES
il J
c•c
PARK _.._ . Q -L I 6 u+� �� O I .
b 0 :•s k
-j .
� f 4) � 1
) Q .lei u
ILIL
,.
��37} PROJECT SITE LExus ` '
3006 3:
44) 2997 M _ - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
2998 2999► o ` +. 1 h ,,� N N Igo P3 - - - -
M. N a /
- : . a -a�. �' _ , 2986: 4 z,
N Z .r AS 2987 2988
993 2994 't215
N ER
a - E r , s SWAI� ' 2978 GULDENS
E ;
w 2976 r 2990, - fro' j O7 °s r
5: �- ,
2970 2999 _:- r _ 1,
�` - •{. .2984 =
2969
2968 - 2962 2980
A.
g r.
� :s - SWgRj; .. r ��4.. fr',. •.t_s `,. 23) � � � � •_ i — sr• - - -- - - � � /
N91 ;' •�, ( "si. •1 8 , I,w 99 X 1 2f 2 s �� C()U1 J TRyV �s3 ivy ;9 (/10
1 h ll6.9b CI � FUTURE AUTO USE
N'•i.L I I 12 $ 1l•0 .� 7 G. � � b.. .
L B (jai 1yc' r1 ai56 `' 13 01 \ 14 C
S9
(p Z 2 •si Fe
_ •,.
- a + - ►s,,,: o Zo. (30 Oki 'L COLLISION
-by c t
�' • 4 c 14,
I.A IV ,r - i - _ GOLF
o O. .. • 135 COURSE
19 (33; MAPLEWOOD TOYOTA
OULv 1 C'�. 142.31 a y C
BUILDING
• er p , , IaB. O 11 o a -
4 o3 t
15 (ZS' �y 1e' 2b 21 3 14
�4 , - � X 13 19 ,. (31.` f3''� 112 .2 -•►.- ll.r
O
o w 2 1 Y r1f. - (49
16 a. 3 * iej • C ZZ�
(G4) )
RE% 19
17- J \ 16 1 I d 1 .. : 14)_' ,� 3 (5b
17 n o o ` v or +, v 2889 f
g�.
,s
8'�. � 121.1 6o IDe - T6 14 .(51) ( * ' •. 18 13 id
a; e e f,
f o f'i
o --..c ex9n :a /ri
7 5'
•w ---- - -• - - V
° r2 �� - _ E BEAM AVENUE
I 1.51 ac Q ,6taz _ ' Fe w:
fte Qi \, I . 4 5'JSC v , I 2 ji• 3[ / r 9 94 ae c �r ! FJ t7 $T
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
23
4
N
Attachment 5 .
PROP05ED PHASE i
%.M. COF. OF THE'
�'A. E. 114. OF :!E N.E. V4,
SEC. A. - 29. R. 22
_COUNTY RC 11 ?F THE N.E. 3/4. OF THE N.E. 314. 5
89'57'2" 1r"66Q.73'`''�'W;.5 OFEA}-- - ---�_
' --- —
o
�. -
_ -
r—. o
C.
r: o
iP
1 ,
r-,
l
C._:i
v
L.
PHASE 1 AREA TABULATIONS:
SINGLE FAMILY: 7.5 ACRES (13 LOTS)
TOWNHOME: 12.8 ACRES (36 LOTS)
APARTMENT: 6.9 ACRES 122 UNITS)
CITY STREET ROW: 1.6 ACRES
TOTAL 1'UD INCLUDING OUTLOTS:
TOTAL UNITS: 222
TOTAL AREA: 444 ACRES
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY AREA: 14.4 ACRES (28 LOTS)
TOTAL CITY STREET ROW. 2.4 ADZES
T NET SINGLE FAMILY /IKEA: 12.0 ACRES)
OTAL TOW14HOME AREA: 19.3 ACRES (72 LOTS) i
TOTAL APARTMENT COMPLEX AREA: 6.6 ACRES (122 UNITS)
TOTAL MNDOT ROW: 11 ACRES
GROSS DEN5ITY 5.0 UNITS PER ACRE
AVERAGE SI NGLE FAMILY LOT (ENTIRE SITE): ?1.200 6F
AVERAGE TOWNHOME DOUDLE LOT (ENTIRE SITE): 11,900 6F
Md WE
60 I j .� �� � 1 30. MR.
r t �
— - T 'r " .-_ — COFI. OF TFi: 1 I (fi4 1 , ; j t
Qv —
i ►. N. ?'/A. OF THE M.E. ]/4. 6�1�F1 ;.IHE OF 'IHt N. B.1 !/4• OF iliE NDA *,1Nt45i !/4. SEC. 4. �. 291 H.21
'
U 4 4. T. 29, A. 22
r'
�'.
r'
�u �13.161��
F 6- 5
1�.. ''':
r .....; �..;. hl6� :5'
/...:
A G5 '45 A
rr 1 �� t ! t_ � 4:.bc . ....................
1:11 1;: �` • X1
` <I
.. ...........
lll'fi: D l E DE3ERlV...W0).. _ 92. A4 _ +
i;
i
:.
M NDOT
IUTLOT G; t La
W
56 UNIT C. ..�
NNHOME o r.
WMIPLEX =' o
i 0n �.
V.
t • �
i;
S. E. CDR. Or TFE
N. E. 2 /4_,_�7E_THE -irk
PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT
24
4
N
Attachment 6
PROPOSED PHASE 1
PROPOSED LOT AREAS
SITE PLAN
25
4
N
Attachment 7
�;j¢ =. � r . I � � 1 • � ,� +•: � •� r ; •. r
..�.' •In -� ..7Qj:.. �.�.... J..�� y ' ..r 1 .��_� '.N - -_ = Y....� ....`�'�,,� _- - Sc. -'mss' ...M•�- �r �� �..
.T:
• �;• s
•: y }•' r 9
1 S
• s �i
F.
1 �
1,
• t i
HIS - \•
? 1 •1
Lo"tlan of Fi nf,
bras ! om field maNdn�
a
1
•� • 1 F ` bra. _ 1 ` ' • ' / /f :: !
to ' : _ 1 ' � • 1 .1;' ;/�'si,. — ti � r f � • f
r .' . , .� ,• a•
Of
9wQ
TO-
PROPOSED GRADING PLAN
26
n �\
r
ti
,
4
N
Attachment 8
PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN
27
f .
l i
N
F
I
El
oe
Woe,
jol
Z ia - - 4 -
>
4z,
ner
I - ME 3
V I
V
Attachment 9
Trees marked ad 16wrW in the &IJ
igm as we"Widd Lv citrwy-'r6rd6rOM. lhG-
Bltd WhWhd 121 1= trMS Aid AidgGrIbM
by thd Cit of MApWi6Mi
I , , - "
T acid num ber sib fbilows:
1. 1 ,, IT Y
0A 29
'Aph 40 MINA C 14
-.^;. i PO * I
'3
16 OAMAOM 4
-.A—
Eli
0.
t.
do
or
4.
ir
40
TREE INVENTORY PLAN
28
4
At ttildtl It Ida- -fit C I A.W. that aft lar tr,fts will batti
mewed, ag
tHa of ftrwototh a h
y Pu
prpp
Mfoor ile May d ada to the 4 1%j1h o pun MilGh
WNW Ahow p - at h Of 66M6 tmmli
The (size of t* Bps v) w-M. rirl be At 666t 2.5 foclo;66
In d1jornater. no fbtatlb" atow species has not y et bald d
ti
if � f - .
- -le
re�
iA Ito
lit a • ....
.
or
j p.
tX46W.4 4? F Lyt
bMdA We W Matrt&-
0
;-.-- I !-- - E .
v UA
AL AK
23'Ns
1AW,
04
kB
Apoi
4
Ir
4 1
-.A—
Eli
0.
t.
do
or
4.
ir
40
TREE INVENTORY PLAN
28
4
At ttildtl It Ida- -fit C I A.W. that aft lar tr,fts will batti
mewed, ag
tHa of ftrwototh a h
y Pu
prpp
Mfoor ile May d ada to the 4 1%j1h o pun MilGh
WNW Ahow p - at h Of 66M6 tmmli
The (size of t* Bps v) w-M. rirl be At 666t 2.5 foclo;66
In d1jornater. no fbtatlb" atow species has not y et bald d
ti
if � f - .
- -le
re�
iA Ito
lit a • ....
.
or
j p.
tX46W.4 4? F Lyt
bMdA We W Matrt&-
0
Attachment 10
W.W. CSI. w T!
• ��w.E. Ilk OF TIE II.E. !/♦.
sm. A. T.
I �
COUNTY ROAD .O
--- 69'57'28" W
1
r -
• - t .. _ �•�.�►•lu�._e ..ham_.. ��.
4'
" qpM LINE OF THE M.E. 1/4, OF THE N.E. !M.
Ll
X661. Ck DEV •., - _ laa :.arr .a�e
Ck
i . S lw i a. 'F mAiLi L=TS
Co
+ t l Acr *UL L A-Tiaws W ILL VJF- Q wa-A"W p
qw
a T4L •tWLAjom K%i Lx400bx F•eaK k=wx s
W C M• G, �6oJ� r� TM� Rrs t!1►RiwG -
i�
10" hM• be• CMotA P ile...� 1.srreT:s s s E .►c
* S awt F" I l.ar �,.� R9 1VL Two ivxss .
b
t 1 N -t f '
t _._- - - - - -- - -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - k- -� .. a .
•- -- -�_ aed ATu
--------- - - - - --
.
1----- • - -- ler7if3•1 - - - -- I ' rr ' - - - - - -- \ i.6 bL T�flM/I�RA..
_rrr_ _�� - -_ -� 3�_ • ' 1
Ft. AloCO EA7EiENT J=, Ilo. 15lMOQ1 1 I r! . IA� �� OF 1 o. lesi�6u ! —1 ! � 5. 89 '57' 32' E 548.51 ` � 16 o SO4 "E 7l.QO : 9.59'24 - - - -- - - -- A goo
rwww �_ww w_r 1.
f • � ____' - -- � _____.___- _____ -____ = -�f _mow -�� �
4f
L 49.W
3~
ui
E 1 i w
i ro m •
w
416 "o.
• 1 ! R•t I J
a J :k• °• -
En
- — — — •4B 9 S"WE jot All
Is
— -- -- C
1 �t ♦� 3 ('--'--� �� � i .:F. CM. off
L '.
�� — — — --� 4 �. coA.. a T!!E 2 l� 1 I �� T go
I f � II. �, n' TIC N. /�� LIME of �. 144. 9E T E NoTiEw 814. WC. 4 'T. �` e� :. _ .. �,� ..
• r.
KOHLWAN LAKE W COUNTRY E SUmNiI I
OVERLOOK
PROPOSED TREE PLAN
29
4
N
Attachment 11
Proposed Interoaction
of Lydia Ave. and Highway 61
(Approx scale 1 11 E50
PROPOSED INTERSECTION DETAIL
30
i I
N
Attachment 12
BRENT R. JORGENSON
1235 Summit Court
Maplewood, MN 55109
H: 612 -481 -7825 W: 612 481 -4076
May 21, 2000
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
Community Development Department
City of Maplewood
1830 East County road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Roberts:
I have read the Neighborhood Survey letter you sent and I also attended the recent
meeting that the Development Team had in Gulden's Restaurant. I am a homeowner and
my property is adjacent to the South Side of the Proposed Development. There are a
couple of areas of great concern with this proposal.
Our strongest, obi ect ion is the proposed Apartment c om .1e�� A p artments in general have
a negative impact on: property values. This complex :al o f calls -for a port ion of it ' to be
allocated for �,o v -h/Ioc erate .Income housing, which would further e r " property values.
The high density of this proposal will significantly increase the traffic in our
neighborhood to an unacceptable level. Traffic from the majority of the development
South of the power lines will be forced to drive down Duluth Street to access North
bound Highway b 1.
The properties adjacent to the project site are currently zoned RI with a small portion
being Ml. We would support development with a majority of the property being zoned
R and a strip of Ml along Highway 61.
Thank -you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Brent Jorgenson
Ann Jorgenson �
31
Attachment 13
May 23, 2 0 0.0
Commu De velopment Dept
City of Maplewood
1830 E County Rd B
Maplewood, MN 55109-2797
M -A Y
P'c
In reference. to this proposed building plan offered by M r
F rat t a l one , we are very concerned about the following i s sue s- !
-1. We DO NOT OPPOSE the 34 . single. houses on Carry Drive nor
the 36 unit Townhome complex. The 34 single homes would
add value to the existing homes on.Duluth.St and the Cul
de Sacs leading off Duluth St
2. We DO OPPOSE the 122 unit apartment complex for the
following reasons;
a, Lower t he value of cur rent hones on Du St and Cut
de Sacs to include the proposed 34 single family homes.
b, With the current traffic f l ow ' on Rte 61, a. burden of
traffic volume would increase on Duluth St via Lydia.
Ave to include acts Bean Ave and Rte 61.:.
DO O POSE Lydi ave between Duauth St and proposed.
Eng1 sY�.::Lane four obvious traf=ffc volume on..:Duluth St.
4t We Attended a meeting with Per
associates and they could not
that will occur on Jcts Lydia
of Beam Ave and Rte 61, Mir Fri
as to the traf f is flow during
equipment vehicles.
Frattalone and his
address the traffic problem
ave and Rte 61. nor the Jct s
attalone was also not clear
the construction by
PREVIOUS SITUATION OBSERVAT ION . Reference to the construct
of .Toyota dealership and Lemetrys Body Shop on ' Rte 61.
1. The general opinion of the neighborhood on Duluth St and
Cul de Sacs were opposed to the construction. They were
constructed.
2. We understood that Toyota dealership would refrain of
having their emp parking on Beam ave and off loading
vehi cles on Beam ave. SI REMAINS TO EXIST with the
parking and off loading.
Comparing the Toyota dealership and Lemetry construction,
what are we to believe with the Fratta construction.
t ) � ffi &EA"raft_ s zqg& v v
32
��NNES
o s
F ;;0
Attachment 14
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road 132
Roseville, MN 55113
June 16,. 2000
Ms. Melinda Coleman
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Subject: _ Highpoint Ridge
Mn/DOT - Metro Division Plat Review #S00 -013A
West of Trunk Highway 61 and South of County Road D
Maplewood, Ramsey County
Control Section 6222
Dear Ms. Coleman:
Please be advised that the Minnesota. Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above
referenced site plan. Before any further development, please address the following issues:
■ Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and
highways.. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often results in complaints about traffic
noise.:..Traffic noise from this highway:. could .exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota
Pollution Control.. Agency, the U.S. De artment ;:.o f �Housin and Urban Develo m
p ent and the: U. S:
.Department of Trans ortation. Mn/DOT olio re ardn deelo merit a
d scent to exstin highway s
p J g ;
pr6hibits:;'_thw; expenditure of highway funds for noise miti aon ,measures- The project developer:,
p J p .
should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impacts of any
highway noise. Please direct questions concerning Mn/DOT's noise policy to Jim Hansen (651 -582-
13 92) of our Transportation Planning section.
■ Any impact to Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Please direct questions regarding permit
applications to Keith Van Wagner (651- 582 -1443) of Mn/DOT's Permits section.
The above comments are in addition to those in our letter correspondence we sent to you dated April 7,
2000. Please address all future correspondence for development activity such as plats, site plans,
environmental reviews, and comprehensive plan amendments to:
Sherry Narusiewicz
Mn/DOT - Metro Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B -2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Please note that Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and
two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a
plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay
Mn/DOT's review and response to development ,proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation
in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return
incomplete submittals.
An equal opportunity employer
33
Feel free to contact me at (651) 582 -1771 if should have any questions.
a rely,
Paul Czech
Senior Transportation Planner/Local Government Liaison
Copy: David Claypool - Ramsey County
Barry Morgan - Master Civil & Construction Engineering, Inc.
Mn/DOT Division File — C.S. 6222
Mn/DOT LGL File — Maplewood
34
Attachment 15
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Frank Frattalone proposed changes to the city's land use plan from R -1 (single
dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential
medium density) for the site.
WHEREAS, this change applies to property for the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D
and west of Highway 61 in Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the applicant also requested a change to the land use plan to drop the planned minor
collector street between County Road D and Highway 61.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On June 19, 2000, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published
a hearing notice in the Maplewood. Review and sent notices to the surrounding property
owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and
present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council
approve the western part of the proposed plan (west of the existing M -1 zoning line),
including the plan amendment for the area west of the M -1 line.
2. On July 10, 2000, the city council discussed the proposed land use plan changes. They
considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council the above- described
changes for the following reasons: -
1. The development would be consistent with the goals and objectives : of the com rehensive
plan.
.. p
2. The town house and apartment sites in the development are r0 er for and consistent
p p p with
the city's policies for medium and high - density residential uses. These include:
a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing and proposed low density
residential and commercial land uses.
b. It is on an arterial street and is near a collector street.
3. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because:
a. The proposed single dwellings will separate the proposed town houses and
apartments from existing homes.
b. There should be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing local
residential streets. The proposed street pattern keeps the town house and apartment
traffic separate from the proposed and existing single dwellings.
4. The city nor the developer plan to build the proposed collector street between County Road
D and Highway 61 because the of the existing and proposed grades, the existing power
lines and the existing pipelines make it difficult to build a street in this area.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 2000.
35
Attachment '16
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Frank Frattalone, representing Frattalone Excavating, applied for a conditional use
permit (CUP) for the Highpoint Ridge residential planned unit development (PUD).
WHEREAS, this change applies to undeveloped property for the High point Ridge PUD south of
Count Road D and w p g
County west of Highway 61. The legal description of these properties are:
PID: 04- 29- 22 -12- 0009 -5
Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX E 160 FT THE S 100 FT OF N
358 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22
PID: 04- 29- 22 -12- 0008 -2
Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX E 160 FT THE S 202 FT OF N
560 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF THE NIE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22
PID: 04- 29- 22 -12- 0001 -1
Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 E 100 FT OF N 158 FT OF NW 1/4
OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22
PID: 04- 29- 22 -12- 0002 -4
Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX N 158 FT LYING E OF CAREY
HEIGHTS DRIVE AS SD DRIVE IS DESC IN DOC NO 1634533; THE N 1443.8 FT
OF PART OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LYING ELY OF WLY LINE OF SD DRIVE. ALSO
E 130 FT OF PART OF SD 1/4 1/4 LYING S RN 22
PID: 04- 29- 22 -12- 0010 -5
Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION. 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 SUBJ.:TO_ CO RD AND WITH RD
ESMT EX E 160 FT THE N 258 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF' 1 /4 OF NE 1 /4 OF
SE.0 4 TN 29 RN 22
PID: 04- 29 -22 -12 -0006
Description: PLAT.03032 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 S 100 FT
OF N 1044 96/100 FT OF
PART WLY OF CL OF RD ESMT IN DOC 1634533 OF E 9 ACRES NW 1/4 OF NE
1/4 (SUBJ TO ESMTS) IN SEC 4, TN 29, RN 22
PID: 04- 29 -22 -11 -0006
Description: ALL THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4 ) OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER (NE 1/4), OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, EXCEPT THE
EAST 661.6 FEET OF THE NORTH 1,006 FEET, AND SUBJECT TO COUNTY
ROAD D, AND SUBJECT TO A GAS PIPELINE EASEMENT LOCATED THEREON
PID: 04- 29 -22 -11 -0005
Description: TRACT A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 322, RAMSEY COUNTY
MINNESOTA AND THE SOUTH 401.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 1006.00 FEET OR
THE EAST 661.80 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, EXCEPT THE NORTH
676.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND: BEGINNING AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER, THENCE WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, 5.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTHERLY
741.30 FEET TO A POINT 15.00 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST
36
PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER, 15.00 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE: THENCE NORTH,
ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PID: 04- 29- 22 -12- 0007 -9
Description: THE SOUTH 224 96/100 FEET OF THE NORTH 834 96/100 FEET OF THE EAST 9
ACRES OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 4,
TOWN 29, RANGE 22, EXCEPT THE EAST 160 FEET THEREOF, TOGETHER
WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS BY FOOT AND BY VEHICLE
TO AND FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY OVER AND ALONG THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY TO WIT: THE WEST 60 FEET OF THE
EAST 160 FEET OF THE NORTH 834.96 FEET OF THE EAST 9 ACRES OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29,
RANGE 22-
All in Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 19, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
the western part of the proposed development for the permit.
2. On July 10, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council ave everyone
rY one
at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning ,commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, ; BE IT RESOLVED that the cit council the above- described
.. y
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
37
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan and preliminary plat date- stamped June 30, 2000
except where the city requires changes. The developer shall revise the grading, utility, tree
planting and other project and construction plans to follow the site plan and preliminary p lat
dated June 30, 2000. The city council may approve major changes. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall
include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, trails, tree and driveway and
parking lot plans.
4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The
developer shall give the city an easement for this pond and shall be responsible for getting
any needed off -site pond and drainage easements.
5. The developer or contractor shall:
a. : Complete ; a I grading for the site drainage. ands he pond, complete all .public
.improvements and meet all city requirements.
b. Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs' at the grading limits.
g 9 g
C. Remove the debris, junk, garbage and travel trailers from the site.
6. This approval does not include the final design approval for the duplexes, townhomes or
for the apartment buildings. The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping and
site plans for these to the community design review board (CDRB) for approval by the
CDRB.
7. The city shall not issue any building permits for construction on an outlot (per city code
requirements). The developer must record a final plat to create buildable lots for any outlot
in the preliminary plat before the city will issue a building permit.
8. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 2000.
38
Attachment 17
NO PARKING RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Maplewood has approved a residential PUD and preliminary plat known as Hi h oint
Ridge. � p g p
WHEREAS, the developer wants to have reduced street right -of -way widths and reduced street
pavement widths in this development.
WHEREAS, the city has approved reduced street right -of -way widths and reduced street p avement
widths in the development, subject to on- street parking restrictions.
WHEREAS, Section 29 -52(b) of city code allows variations from the city code standards if they
do not affect the general purpose of the city code.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that Maplewood prohibits the arkin of motor
vehicles on both sides of all public � p• g
p c streets less than 28 feet wide and prohibits parking on one side of
the public streets that are 28 feet to 32 feet wide in the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of Count Road D
and west of Highway 61 in Section 4 -29 -2 y
g Y 2.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 2000.
:
39
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, JUNE 19 2000
V. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Highpoint Ridge (County Road D and Highway 61): Comprehensive Plan Changes —R -1 (single
dwellings), R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M) (residential
medium density) and drop planned minor collector street; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a
planned unit development (PUD); Preliminary plat; and No parking for one side of private streets
and driveways
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. He answered questions about
proposed traffic signals at Lydia and Highway 61 and anticipated traffic patterns in the area. The
developer has not presented design plans for the apartment complex. Mr. Roberts thought the
density and unit count was important but Commissioner Frost was concerned about the "mass of
buildings."
Commissioner Trippler commented on the extensive amount of traffic currently at County Road D
and Highway 61. Ken Haider, city engineer, said the basis of a long -term plan is to combine the
County Road D and 1 -694 ramp traffic into one intersection that crosses Highway 61. He felt
additional development at the Maplewood Mall would be the impetus to start this traffic - control
project. Mr. Haider spoke about the allowance of u -turns on streets.
Mr. Roberts answered questions from Commissioner Mueller on parking for the apartment
complex and the affect of an apartment building on property values. He pointed out that the
proposed apartment building was fairly well isolated from the existing homes in the area.
Frank Frattalone, the developer of the project, . described his proposal. He said their traffic plans
were submitted to the state for Highway 61 and the county for County Road D and were- approved
by both. He pointed out that, even though it sounds, like a.lot of homes, it is "not real dense " for
this large of an area.
Commissioner Pearson asked if Mr. Frattalone had considered a horseshoe coming down Duluth
Street with a cul -de -sac on the west end of Lydia to better distribute traffic. Ken Haider said the
basis of the design presented in the area was additional emergency access to the existing
development south of this.
Mr. Frattalone confirmed that the apartment complex would be two, three -story units. He showed
a rendering of the buildings. Mr. Frattalone introduced Todd Arness who is affiliated with Bruce
Mogren and would be one of the owners of the apartment project. Mr. Frattalone was not very
receptive to the idea of turning the apartment complex into single - family homes, primarily because
of the elevations on the site and the proximity to Highway 61.
Todd Arness said this apartment would be "a little bit of an upgrade" from the unit built on Gervais
Avenue, west of White Bear Avenue and would have the same ownership. He noted that there will
be about 20 one -unit, 80 two -unit, and 20 three -unit apartments with a rent range of $900-$1200.
He projected that parking required would be a little more than one car per unit. One underground
and one surface parking area would be provided for each apartment. Mr. Frattalone stated that an
annual income of $41,000 for a family of four would be necessary to qualify for these units.
Melinda Coleman, director of community development, cautioned the commission that their role
was not to take income of proposed tenants into account when making their decisions. She also
said that there was no evidence to indicate that apartment buildings lower property values.
According to information she received from the county assessor, a lower value in neighborhoods
was more contingent on the age and maintenance of the structures and on the presence of blight,
such as junk vehicles.
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 06 -19 -00
The hearing was opened for public participation. Jeff Bradt, 1236 Summit Court, was disappointed
in the staff recommendation. He felt it was "insulting" and "arrogant" for staff to write that this
development would be beneficial to the nearby existing residential properties. Mr. Bradt had a
major concern about the future traffic impact and spoke about the situation that now exists. His
apprehension was not about property values but the impact on the "quality of life."
Brent Jorgenson (1235 Summit Court), Joyce Lambert (2986 Duluth Street), Kim Esch (2993
Carey Heights Drive), Valerie Bradt (1236 Summit Court), E. Barrett (1176 County Road D), Doug
Huntley (3020 Edward Street), Dan Jurgens (1225 Summit Court) and the occupant of 1245
Summit Court spoke about traffic concerns, the impact of the apartment complex on the area. The
public hearing portion of the meeting was closed.
A short break in the meeting was taken.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend the residential
development to the west of the existing line between the M -1 zone and the R -1 zone be allowed to
occur using a street pattern that would not access Highway 61. It was further recommended, due
to traffic access problems to Highway 61, that the existing M -1 zone be maintained or another low -
traffic volume development be proposed. If Frank Frattalone, the applicant, wishes to alter the line
between the existing M -1 and R -1 zones so that it removes the jog towards the north end, the
Planning Commission would agree with that change.
Commissioner Pearson seconded.
Commissioner Rossbach clarified that his motion meant their would be no access. from the
-residential area through the M -1 zone) to Highway.,61. The traffic would go down through Duluth
..Street or Carey Heights Drive. The M -1 line would be straight north /south and ;would. not. jog. He
confirmed that there would be no R -1` on'the. south ; end of the M -1 zone.. This proposal says that a
development, very similar to the one that is proposed which is to the west of the M- 1/R -1 line,
would be allowed.
Ayes all
The motion passed.
There was a question as to whether there would be motions on the other items. Mr. Roberts
thought there could be action taken on the part of the plat that was west of the "line."
Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of Recommendations
:B, C, and D to be consistent with the motion in A.
B. Approve the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a planned unit
development for the Highpoint Ridge housing development. The city bases this approval on
the findings required by code. (Refer to the resolution for the specific findings.) Approval is
subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans date - stamped May 26, 2000, except where the
city requires changes. The city council may approve major changes. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These
plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, trails, tree and
driveway and parking lot plans.
Planning Commission
Minutes of 06 -19 -00
-3-
4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The
developer shall give the city an easement for this pond and shall be responsible for
getting any needed off -site pond and drainage easements.
5. The developer or contractor shall:
a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public
improvements and meet all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Remove the debris, junk, garbage and travel trailers from the site.
6. This approval does not include the final design approval for the duplexes, townhornes
or for the apartment buildings. The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping
and site plans for these to the community design review board (CDRB) for approval by
the CDRB.
7. The city shall not issue any building permits for construction on an outlot (per city code
requirements). The developer must record a final plat to create buildable lots for any
outlot in the preliminary plat before the city will issue a building permit.
8. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
C. Approve the Highpoint Ridge preliminary plat (received by the city on May 26, 2000). The
developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat:
1. Sign an -agreement with the city. that guarantees that the developer or - -contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and
meet all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Have NSP install Group V rate street lights in at least nine locations - primarily at street
intersections and street curves. The exact style and location shall be subject to the city
engineer's approval.
d. Pay the city for the cost of traffic - control, street identification and no parking signs.
e. Provide all required and necessary easements.
f. Demolish or remove the existing house and garage at 1170 County Road D, and all
other buildings, scrap metal, debris and junk from the site.
g. Cap and seal all wells on site that the owners are not using; remove septic systems or
drainfields, subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines. Within one year of the contractor
installing the sanitary sewer, the owners of the existing houses on Carey Heights Drive
shall connect their houses to the sanitary sewer.
h. Complete all the curb and gutter on Duluth Street and on Carey Heights Drive on the
south side of the site. This is to replace the temporary cul -de -sac, repair the cul -de -sac
pavement and restore and sod the boulevards.
Planning Commission
Minutes of 06 -19 -00
-
I. For the trails, complete the following:
(1) Construct an eight- foot -wide paved walkway and two -rail split -rail fencing between
Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, between the street and the proposed east /west trail in Block
3, and along the north side of the lots in Block One (in the easement area) as shown
on the plat date - stamped May 26, 2000. The developer shall extend the west end
of the trail in Lot 3, Block One into the city park to connect to the existing park trail.
All trails between lots shall be in a 18- foot -wide trailway or pedestrian way or in
easement areas.
(2) The developer shall install a two-rail split -rail fence on both sides of each trail and
posts at the end of the trails to prevent motorized vehicles from using the trail.
(3) The developer shall build the trails and fencing with the streets.
(4) The city engineer must approve these plans.
j. Install signs where the driveways for the twin homes and for the town houses intersect
the public streets indicating that they are private driveways.
2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail, sidewalk and street
plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code.
b. The grading plan shall show:
(1) The proposed building pad elevation and contour information #or each home site.
The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat.
(2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
(3) House pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large
trees.
(4) The proposed street and trail grades as allowed by the city engineer.
(5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the
plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. On
slopes steeper than 3:1, the developer shall prepare and implement a stabilization
and planting plan. At a minimum, the slopes shall be protected with wood fiber
blanket, be seeded with a no maintenance vegetation and be stabilized before the
city approves the final plat.
(6) All retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a
building permit from the city.
(7) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city
engineer.
(8) No grading beyond the plat boundary without temporary grading easements from the
affected property owner(s).
Planning Commission -5-
Minutes of 06 -19 -00
(9) A minimum of a 10- foot -wide, 10:1 bench below the normal water elevation (NWL)
of any pond designed to be a wet pond. The depth of the pond below the NWL shall
not exceed four feet.
C.* The tree plan shall:
(1) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or final plat approval.
(2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan shall
include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
(3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous trees
shall be at least two and one half (2 %2) inches in diameter and shall be a mix of red
and white oaks, ash, lindens and sugar maples. The coniferous trees shall be at
least eight (8) feet tall and shall be a mix of Austrian pine and other species.
(4) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
(5) Include for city staff a detailed planting plan and material list.
(6) Be revised to group the new trees together. These planting areas shall be around
the ponding areas, on the steep slopes, along the common property lines between
residences and along all of the proposed trails. The developer may use the tree
groupings to separate the different types of residences.
(7) .Show the planting of at least 242 trees after the site grading is done.
d. The street, trail and utility plans shall show:
(1) Paved walkways and two -rail split -rail fences in a trailway or pedestrian way as
shown on the proposed plans. This shall include the trail between Lots 4 and 5,
Block 1, in Block 3 (as revised), between Block 1 and Block 3 (under the power
lines), connecting to the existing park trail to the west of the site and on the east side
of English Lane (Ridge Lane) to connect to the proposed apartment site. The parks
and recreation director shall approve their locations and design.
(2) The public streets shall be a 9 -ton design with a maximum street grade of eight
percent and the maximum street grade within 75 feet of all intersections at two
percent.
(3) All the streets, parking areas and driveways with continuous concrete curb and
gutter.
(4) All public street right -of -ways shall be at least 60- feet -wide.
(5) The completion of the curb and gutter on the north end of Duluth Street and the
existing Carey Heights Drive cul -de -sac, the repair or replacement of the cul -de -sac
pavement and the restoration and sodding of the boulevards around the cul -de -sac.
(6) A connection between the proposed water main in Block 3 and the proposed water
main system on the southerly part of the plat. The developer also shall make a
connection between the proposed water main on Lydia Avenue at Highway 61 and
the existing water main on the west side of Highway 61, south of Guldens.
Planning Commission -6-
Minutes of 06 -19 -00
(7) The coordination of the water main alignments and sizing with the standards and
requirements of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services ( SPRWS). Available fire
flow analysis shall be determined for the water system at the proposed apartment
complex as well as through the existing 8 -inch and 12 -inch crossings of Highway 61
at Beam Avenue. Fire flow requirements shall be verified with the Maplewood Fire
Department.
(8) All utility excavations located within the proposed right -of -ways or within easements.
The developer shall acquire easements for all utilities that would be outside the
project area.
(9) A reduced number of sanitary and storm sewer manholes and water main bends by
..........
"cutting corners" with the utility alignments. The developer's engineer shall verify with
the SPRWS the acceptable water main alignments and crossings. Manholes may be
offset from the street centerline if the result lessens the number of structures.
(10) Provisions for public utilities and service(s) to the vacant or undeveloped properties
on the south side of the proposed Lydia Avenue.
e. The drainage plan shall ensure that there is no increase in the rate of storm water run -off
leaving the site above the current (predevelopment) levels.
3. Change the plat as follows:
a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer.
b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These
easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines .and five Jeet,
wide along the side property lines.
c. Revise the lot lines in Block One and Block Three so there is a 18- foot -wide trail or
pedestrian way between Lots 4 and 5, Block One and between Lots 6 and 7 or between
Lots 8 and 9, Block Three to accommodate the proposed trails.
d. Show the existing pipeline and the NSP and pipeline easements on the final plat.
e. Show all public street right -of -ways at 60 feet wide.
f. Make as many of the property lines as is reasonably possible radial to the cul -de -sacs
or perpendicular to the street right -of -ways.
g. If necessary, increase the lot widths for the lots next to the pipeline to ensure that the
house pads will be at least 100 feet away from the pipeline. (code requirement)
h. Change the street names as follows:
1. Carey Heights Drive shall be used only in Block 2 (Phase One) of the project. The
north /south street between Outlot A and Outlot B shall be Duluth Street.
2. Highpoint Court shall be called Ridge Place.
3. English Lane shall be called Ridge Lane.
4. The cul -de -sac in Block 3 shall be called Highridge Court.
Planning Commission -7-
Minutes of 06 -19 -00
I. Show the extra ten -feet of street right -of -way for County Road D.
4. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including:
g
a. Any off -site drainage and utility easements.
b. Any necessary easements for the dedication and construction of Lydia Avenue.
5. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site e.
The city rains engineer shall include in the g
Y g developer's agreement any grading that the developer
or contractor has not completed before final plat approval.
6. Record the following with the final plat:
a. All homeowners association documents.
b. A deed restriction prohibiting the construction of a dwelling or its attachments within 100
feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline. This affects Lots 3 through 6, Block 1 and Lots 7
through 18, Block 3 of the proposed preliminary plat the city received on May 26, 2000.
The developer also shall notify the purchasers of the pipeline location.
c. A deed dedicating 10 feet of additional right -of -way along County Road D for future
street widening with the final plat. The applicant shall submit the language for this
dedication to the city for approval before recording.
ti
d. A covenant or deed restriction with the final lat that prohibits the driveways .. .. ,.. p o n
Lots 1, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 36; - Block 3 .from .going onto County Road D.
e. A covenantor deed restriction that prohibits an further subdivision or splitting Y p ng of the lots
or parcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless approved by the
city council.
The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the city for
approval before recording.
7. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for . radin
g g
8. The owners of the properties at 1174 and 1176 County Road D shall change the addresses
of their properties to Carey Heights Drive addresses within 30 days of the contractor
installing the base bituminous course for the new public street in front of their homes.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community
development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the city ssues a grading r
approves the final plat.
Y g g pe mil or
D. Adopt the resolution which is for the on- street parking standards and no on- street arkin
p g
requirements for the Highpoint Ridge PUD south of County Road D and west of Highway 61.
g Y
Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Ayes all
The motion passed.
City of Maplewood
Official Sign-Up'Sheet
By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the
Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes.
Name (first &last) - please pint Address
�l 1. _ FlOrL14k
/a33 &/ WA C +. MIA k.,o, J MN ss1o
I z.
3. Pewf' �orti�v���H
4. r 0�e�� u
\\/ 6
7
s.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
c�-
�6
s. yaA^ 5 Y0& ZY,9V G <Of
City of Maplewood
Official Sign -Up Sheet
By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the
Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes.
Name (first &last) -please print
" 15.
v 16.
IT
180
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
Address
12S3
LA W''d
430z f� Wks ?W-D �`I �
City of Maplewood
Official Sign -Up Sheet
Name (first &last - please print_
N'NE
Address
C!
By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the
Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes.
AGENDA ITEM .� /
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council
TO: City Engineer
Date
FROM: Public Works Coordinator Endorsed
Mod
SUBJECT: Bituminous Seal Coating, Project 00-07—Award of Bid Rejected
DAT E: June 30, 2000
Two bids were received on June 29, 2000 for Bituminous Seal Coating, Project 00 -07.
Pearson Bros., Inc. submitted the low bid of $88,005 for the proposal. Allied Blacktop
Co. submitted a bid of $89,-650.
There were inconsistencies in the bid submitted by low bidder. The city attorney's
office has reviewed these inconsistencies and advised us that the inconsistencies were
substantial enough to warrant the award of bid to the second lowest bid, Allied
Blacktop.
Attached is the recommendation of the city attorney's office, along with the tabulation of
bids and the resolution recommending award of bid to Allied Blacktop Company
p p Y
Based on the recommendation of the city attorney's office, it is recommended the
city council award the bid for Bituminous Seal Coating, Project 00 -07, to Allied
Blacktop Company in the amount of $89,650.
LAL
jC
Attachments
SENT BY: +6 -30- 0 3 : 32PM BANK IGAN & Y-4
161263722097'# 2/ �
B - n�i�a�n t" Kel1„v P.A.
mom
A T r 0 R M E Y S A T t. A W
17X lV0= j 'io*=
' X101=5
SANT FAM WHIM 03 141 -2132
XMN RA1+IoAK JR.
Paj. IMLLY
XMLO '
MrAM'O
SA LO
AZU .AM
M LCKXXX
,itme 30. 2040
030224-3
NamW10 (631) 2234019
�tk�all�I.a�t
PitIVILEGED AND CO TI+'IDEPT'1?AL
I1+Gr. l(+�t1 ��'itkr
M LitY �
City of Mapbwooct
1130 East County Road B
Mapkwvod, MN 55109
ME: Bids for City Pro 004
Dew W.
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
The foIbwiog is a r00=101M to an *uIry ftm the Pubic Works DaputrnGnt mgarding a bid fbr
the luminous Seal �osti City Frojoct Ow,
Wue: Whether a Bid ihst did not as Ecryal m,Plopmcnt uppc►rtunity report may
be r failing to meet ft US= ions of the Bid Form.
Amwer, Yes,
The Bid Form fm +City Pt+�,�oct OU-U7 requires that "[t]he folbwmg documents are attached to and
a a con of this bid ... Equal empbYmput oP'pott�dt�► report " In addition, the Form also
sees "[t]bie City of 1Vbplewood requires bidt for Aft- bids to provide imfomrnstion
co�nigg their m the empbyment otn�i�oritias a�ad womea" Under the curreEit status of
both dal and daw Ltw, a rnu�nicspal oorposatian my ro4uirc stricter wti-dberkdrMion
sts�dan�s draw b�o�th the t'e�iera�l gad date as long as those roquhments do not
cot'�ct wax i'etieral or state law, in addition, the pity can requic+e bicbders to pMvidC information
cD C%jlal Ot Op011llanJ/ Or e"[i A- VAC achDtL Th1.% Map18Wood W11d1tliD[I
that �R q�{OI�ICt �111�� 8 bid �Dl' 8 II9�1�0� 11�IpVElnCt� be ieqLMltW to OoIi1pletC an Equal
CII'�� �Dmpl'�Ul1�i repDtt IS 8 Y9Ud '4,Dri►11.
Under law, a private amployor wlq empbyaes mm dw 100 must file the EEO-1. In this
c�a, Mr. Pe�n�n !mss meted that he has *wer then 20 emQloyees. Thus, he is not required to file
the BECK 1 wider f+e i law. However, the City is not requiring Mr. Pemmn to provide or Ville
an EEO- 1. The City is only requesting tb�t the bidder complete s chart entitled "`Equal
�P�J+�'� a�Y art" a�i �a�r imfurmation ooncecninB �4� mPloYment opportunity
ard 0mumfive action.
SENT BY •
Lotttr to Mr. Haidtr
Jwja 30, 2000
pp 2
6 -30- 0 3:33PM BANNIGAN & KELLY-4 18126372209;# 3/
Ia Wdfting Iv1innesota JAWWbW3C to cow provl�io�s inks contracts tit the private
employer is not in violdion of state n laws. '1"1te Minneaata Attorney (3enaal issued
4paaion 1006
On 3 Ober 24,19T3 tint held KS A. X412.221, subd. 32, includes the
authudlgr to swum �+eocbm from di�rim�ioa In that COh&% the Attanxy ticneral aLw held
thpt tic subject of tory pmak 8 is nit it rustler "aabty of ate nrere. G'NC3 we
abWiDd w .tlw.00 d0 d Lo - 11lva 110C8s!My t0
PI.0v=
dbc4mhotory Thy, a COl'�1O1�Q i.4not by St8te bw
ftm C_wI ift OW11 CplM�iO�S ID P*ft CO�OtS as long as tf09C C4nft101L4 eCl'w 111:
purposc of ceorryjgg out the of law end tb not aoanufluict with it.
City ref?v* s Bird Form s� on �, p� m - � �h�L
"Bid&v & $tt of the ftrms and wnditiom of the nt or bmWion to bid
t ai to iw WWVIA an thow the dqmsit of
Ow W.
As mtcd prcviou*, one of the oondk- of the did is thet the c 1 complete an Equal
empbya� apportw�ty report. 1'iwe is no 91 I--- of wopby�ces that a private
anPbY'ar mgt in ordar to be r+aquir+ed by the City to ale this report. Thcre6am by faffn* to
comp�Cta tl� — Enna etnpbymea� oppott�m�.j► report, Mr, Pearson Baas fsi�od to sea* a term and
co of the bi&
Aoo~, dae Cidy hes the right to rejad Mr. Pesraon's bid as Im failed to comply with teens,
conditioaa anal to to aidderEft It should abo be noted OW the date for the bids to be
opena� wes June 29, 2000 at 1 Q:00 a.m. and, there�tre; the d�eadiine bas passed.
If you ltt�ve arty go�stiona or cow p1o�e do not he�tate to contact ,
espectfi-ik- y ours,
Juti S
E
TABULATION OF BIDS
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the officials designated for
a bid opening by the City Council of Maplewood was convened at 10 a.m., June 29,
2000. The purpose of this meeting was to receive, open and publicly read aloud bids
for Bituminous Seal Coating, Project 00 -07
Present were: Lance Lundsten and Judy Chlebeck
Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids, the following bids were
opened and read:
Bidder
Amount
Bid Bond
Affidavit
EEO
ADA
Allied Blacktop Co.
$89,650
5%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Pearson Bros., Inc.
88,005
5%
Yes
No
Yes
Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the city clerk referred the bids received to
the city engineer instructing him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation
at the regular city council meeting of July 10, 2000.
Meeting adjourned at 10:06 a.m.
RESOLUTION. FOR AWARD OF BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
that the bid of Allied Blacktop Company in the amount of $89,650 is the lowest
responsible bid for Bituminous Seal Coating, City roject 00 - 07 and the m and
v � y
clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and
on behalf of the city.
The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers
necessary to implement the financing plan for the project.
AGENDA ITEM NOS I OWSMAW010
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager Action by Council
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Cade Amendment — LBC District Regulations Date
End orsed
DATE: June 29, 2000
Mood
INTRODUCTION
Request
Robert J. Tillges, of Tillges Certified orthotic Prosthetic Inc. is requesting .
q g that the city council
amend the LBC (limited business commercial) district provisions to allow his business in a new
location. The zoning for this new location is LBC (limited business commercial ) district. The
LBC requirements list only the following as permitted uses: offices, medical or health - related
clinics and clay care centers.
Reason for the Request
Mr. Tillges manufactures orthotics and prosthetics and fits the patient in. his clinic. The office
and clinic portions of his business meet the code his lab for constructing orthotics and
prosthetics would not meet the code. The code would now consider this light manufacturing.
g
Mr. Tillges wants to move from his current business location at 1933 Sloan Place to a building
currently for sale at 1959. Sloan Place, two lots to the south. .Refer to the maps on a es 3--4
and his letter on pag 5.
p g :. .
p g as new location is coned LBC where
his lab would not be allowed b
-the code: At his current location, the St. Paul Business Center'.Esst he- i
' s an allowed ..use. This
busi complex was approved as a planned unit development for office and industrial
purposes.
BACKGROUND
May 14, 1934: The city council amended the LBC requirements. Prior to this amendment onl
"professional offices and other similar uses" were t
allowed. All proposals, �n fact, had to go
before the city council for assurance of compatibility with the s
conditional use neighborhood, much like Coda e � y'
permit review process. This 1934 amendment allowed "medical or health- related
clinics and dray care centers' and deleted the requirement for city council ap proval as long as the
use complied with the code.
pp 9
DISCUSSION
The intent of the LBC district is to prohibit commercially- intensive and nuisance-causing
businesses next to single dwelling areas. Staff agrees with the purpose and intent of the
ordinance, but also feels that it is somewhat restrictive. Mr. Tillges' business is essentially a
medical clinic by outward appearance and is not disturbing or objectionable to neig hbors. The
lab for making rthotics and g . .
g prosthetics, though technically a manufacturing operation, is not
nuisance causing. Nobody would know that this activity is taking place.
Staff feels that it is in the city's best interest to amend this ordinance in order to retain a desirable
business in Maplewood. To ensure compatibility, staff recommends that the council amend the
code to allow uses similar to those permitted if they are not noxious or hazardous The city is
currently using this language in the city code in the BC -Ill (business commercial-modified), SC
(shopping center ), BC (business commercial) and CO (commercial'office) districts.
COMMISSION AND COUNCIL ACTION
June 5,2000: The planning commission recommended approval.
June 26, 2000: The city council approved the first reading of this code change.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the code amendment on page 6. This amendment allows uses of a "similar" nature to
those already permitted in the LBC (limited business commercial) district.
9
Attachment 1
ST. PAUL BUSINESS CENTER EAST
(MR. TILLGES' CURRENT LOCATION)
V41:1
�r
(e e
LOCATION MAP
3
199 SLOAN PLA
(MR. TI{.LGES' P�tOPOSED
LOCATION)
4
N
Attachment 2
� C
0
z o .
J� 7S
o �3
t JZ
aw 12.41
.06oa_�
ST. PAUL .z
- BUSINESS CENTER EAST
ti .I le �- ° f.
W ' 3- I i
os.• MR. TILLGES' '
5 CURRENT LOCATION
�•
"1 . � 10.13
r
7
�.1
s
b
1 959L SLOAN PLACE
IR.. TI.LLGES' PROPOSED
LOCATION
� I •
1973
r �
o ' NUN■
a i HOSPITALITI� .
I
MINNESOTA
S
• 1 �, I Si- Si-i p Recorded M
is 1 - � =gg
21 � v
W + 0 61
OB vl Qt 1
(13) i ,► 4� `
ri
lo 53.3G
ROSELAWN AVENUE. ._
i.so - 1, i.s f 1;5 _ . +
10
3Oa3o - ST. PAUL �
BOAR OF R EALTORS
PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP
4
4
N
rM
�N
A )
1
ZA
�
to 1
- 2
PARKSIDE
Z
FIRE -
STATION
s�
H-
.197
.
. 19 6 o
v
uu
1951
z
L
. 5 9
uu
�r
:.
M
O8
& :405Y 405 Zz3
�
190
0�
i
33
A
'•
4
Attachment 3
TILLGES CERTIFIED
ORTHOTIC PROSTHETIC INC.
----------- -
LK ...::..,.w:• .,.;y :>...: LL:LX`:...o ......:....:.. J.:l,,.n: ix ., „Sj `<:: ?:�
May 8, 2000
Mr. Tom Ekstrand
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Tom:
Thank you for the "assistance you have provided as I pursue the possibility of purchasing
the building at 1959 Sloan Place in Maplewood. Purchase of this buildin g would
provide space adequate to meet the current and future needs of my expanding business,
and would allow me to continue my practice in a location familiar to my existing patients.
The 1959 Sloan Place site is just two buildings from my current location.
This letter is a formal: re V uest fora zonin code chan a for the ro `Iat 1959 Sl an
q g g p p, rty o
Place. Although, the clinical and : adm.ini strative aspects of our business 'ale corn athle
p
with the current zoning, per our conversation the code presently excludes our lab in the
proposed building. The design and fitting of orthotic and prosthetic devices is a highly -
specialized medical profession. Our on -site lab enables us to design, develop, adjust and
g J
fit orthotic and prosthetic devices for our patients in a clinic setting. we have gone to
considerable effort to insure that the lab environment is safe and comfortable.
Please consider this request to revise the LBC ordinance to include my lab operation for
orthotic /prosthetic construction.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions about this request,
please call me at 772 - 2665.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Tinges, C.P.O.
Y �Y /r / F ' / G.�.::yrY . i ! "�'^/:' .i / i , :rf•.� ' i/,: 'i ,r.. ,'<
- l; : / l:. J', /. /..,.N^i. ..Y :i.,� .;ii "�� .N, ,J'C'!� /i:1. : /J'K /u...Cllff 'r i�� J /T..: Ji, I(�'+. 'i •J'f
t% r � / . ✓. '.. / ,c, . :: T.. �.: ✓ y,� , J J• , ':: %:U „q, l,.,o�; n !„ `S.J%'Y ,�> '.�f., :r'�”' : ;;.�vc ro'•I.. 9� . hni »i`
- ��� / ..�J/ .: ?v /::.; "�'z;y., "r�k. ..�vr a ✓. u� "e'�' •�j•» .4,;,,,r,,. L,..>sc..,�� eo. n:!J' ✓•>JY. �L asc�i.,,.4 zc, e ms.
/ .1,.- k r'.' i:.a ';L:': /` :':<,, ir'". .�E. ,(1J• z �. /• Iv'^ xcc•�4o;:. yTr.4s`3 v�.ir�' �i
u fiv,:i ! /f' %' v/'. /��. /i !v, , l�r �J/'/"4. L..��.,.N.. ?91.:Y• ,:L v..'W ,.��
''r - /. / . ^•£., / .L. J i:an ^� /f S, r. aL,J �,..i_,l if' s,.,.:i: ✓, S� .' , r3 , ^ ��.
- - - ,/ ,�'� n b "i �, ^,k, %':r'l; <' :�%1ri�' %< rr•:.•.l': ,y.. , >, 'r �;/ .u, .k. •'3 .Yna ,w �Twh:?�Y' .,sn% �, y
_
1983 SLOAN PLACE ® SUITE 7 * MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55117 e 651 - 772 -2665
5
Attachment 4
ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PERMITTED USES IN THE
LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Ma
Ordinances: g g Maplewood Code of
Section 1. This section changes Sections 36 -154 as follows additions
C are underlined and
deletions are crossed out):
Section 36- 154(x) Permitted Uses. Offices, medical or health-related
elated clinics and day care
centers. The citV will allow uses similar to the above if - thev would not create
the are not noxious or hazardous. T a nuisance and if
The cit council shall review uses that are not clearlv similar
for a determination of compatibility.
Section 36- 154(b) Reserved.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the cif publishes y p sit in the official newspaper.
The Maplewood City Counci a roved this '
pp ordinance on 20.00.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Ayes --
Nays —
0