HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 06-12 City Council PacketI.
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, June 12, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -12
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL _
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Council/Manager Workshop (May 22, 2000)
2. Minutes of Meeting 00 -10 (May 22, 2000)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
1. Certificates of Recognition - Jennifer Dahl and Lindsey Chezik
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted
by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the
Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Video Technician -Change in Guaranteed Minimum Fee
3. Boy Scout Troop 64 -Fee Permit Waiver
4. Ordinance Renumbering City Minutes
5. Reject Bids -Fire Station
6. Labor Contract Amendment
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. Ramsey County Yard Waste Transfer Site Conditional Use Permit Review (Beam
Avenue)
2. 7:10 P.M. Mogren Brothers Landscaping Conditional Use Permit Reconsideration (Behind (West
of) 2599 White Bear Avenue
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. New Fire Department Pagers
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Sprint PCS Telecommunications Monopole (2500 Hudson Place)
A. Conditional Use Permit
B. Design Approval
2. Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, Project 99 -13, Assessment Objections
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Staff Appeal of Comprehensive Sign Plan Revision for JoAnn etc. at Birch Run Station (Beam
Avenue)
2. Request for Recycling Cost Increase - Superior Services
3. Purchase of Tax-Forfeit Property (Van Dyke Street)
4. No Parking -Adele at East Shore Drive
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for
this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make
arrangements. Assistant Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
DI
City of Maplewood
CITY COUNCIL /MANAGER WORKSHOP
Meeting Minutes
Monday, May 22, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
6:00 p.m.
A. Call To Order
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Cardinal at 6:00 p.m.
B. Roll Call
Mayor Robert Cardinal Present
Councilmember Sherry Allenspach Present
Councilmember Kenneth Collins Present
Councilmember Marvin Koppen Present
Councilmember Julie Wasiluk Present
Others Present:
Acting City Manager Kenneth Haider
Community Development Director Melinda Coleman
Ken Roberts
C. Approval of Agenda
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the agenda as submitted. The motion was seconded by
Councilmember Koppen. The motion passed 5 -0.
D. Human Relations Commission Peace Site
On behalf of the Maplewood Human Relations Commission, Regina Laroche - Theune asked Council to
consider a proposal for the City of Maplewood to dedicate its administrative and community buildings
as a "peace site" on August 1, 2000 during the National Night Out.
Councilmember Allenspach moved that the Human Relations Commission proceed with this Droj ect
with the help and support of City Staff and Council. The motion was seconded by Mayor Cardinal. The
motion passed 5 -0.
E. Deer Management
Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. Community Oriented Services Coordinator
Colleen Callahan presented highlights and answered questions about the deer management plan.
Council was informed that they can take action on the deer management plan during the 7:00 p.m. City
Council Meeting.
F. Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce
Acting City Manager Haider noted that the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce was preparing a
booklet "Community Profiles" and the Council needed to decide if they wanted to urchase anyY
advertisement space in the booklet. Council decided not to purchase advertisement space in the booklet.
G. Residential Parking
Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. Community Development Director Coleman
noted that the Maplewood City Code does not address people parking vehicles in yards (non - driveway
areas) and allows residents to have vehicles without current tabs as long as they are screened. Council
directed Community Development Director Coleman to put an article in the Maplewood in Motion and
schedule a public hearing to address residential parking issues.
H. Review City Clean -Up Day
Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report. Community Development Director Coleman
presented the highlights of the successful spring clean -up day and asked Council to consider how they
would like to conduct and fund future clean -up days. Staff will present a plan for next year's clean -up
day, but the general consensus was to have two events, look for a site in south Maplewood and consider
a small charge per vehicle.
I. Other Business
None
J. Future Topics
1. Public Safety Communications
K. Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Cardinal moved and Councilmember Koppen seconded a motion
to adjourn the meeting at 6:45 p.m.
i
I
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, May 22, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -10
A. CALL TO ORDER:
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal
Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
C. ROLL CALL:
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the minutes of Council /Manager Workshop (May 8 2000) as
presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 00 -09 (May 8. 2000) as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the Agenda as amended.
M1. City Council /Parks and Recreation Commission Joint Meeting
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
1
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS:
1. HRA Appointment
Community Development Director Coleman announced that Beth Ulrich has been appointed to the Housing and
Redevelopment Advisory Commission.
2. Resignation and Resolution - Regina Laroche - Theune
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following Resolution of Appreciation for Regina Laroche - Theune:
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 059
JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Regina Laroche - Theune has been a member of the Human Relations Commission Board
since March 27, 1995 and has served faithfully in that capacity; and
WHEREAS, the Human Relations Commission Board has appreciated her experience, insights and good
judgement; and
WHEREAS, Regina has freely given of her time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment
of the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, Regina has shown dedication to her duties and has consistently contributed her leadership
and effort for the benefit of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, and its citizens that Regina Laroche - Theune is hereby extended our gratitude and appreciation for
her dedicated service and we wish her continued success in the future.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
G. CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
1. Approval of Claims
Approved the Claims.
2
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
108,085.69
251,913.50
147,767.62
2.
112,248.09
122
Checks #8289 thru #8300 dated 5 -1 thru 5 -5 -00
Checks #49550 thru #49654 dated 5 -9 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 5 -2 thru 5 -8 -00
Checks #8301 thru #8304 dated 5 -9 thru 5 -12 -00
Checks #49657 thru #49751 dated 5 -16 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 5 -9 thru 5 -15 -00
745,145.63 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
304,306.83 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 5 -12 -00
24,629.05 Payroll Deduction check #78543 thru #78550 dated 5 -12 -00
328,935.88 Total Payroll
1 GRAND TOTAL
2. McKnight Road EVP, Project 98 -09
Established a budget of $18,000 for Project 98 -09, McKnight Road Emergency Vehicle Pre- emption System
EVP).
3. Brad L. Beatty and William C. Schwartz - Approval of Used Car Lot
Approved the application from Brad L. Beatty and William C. Schwartz for a used car lot at 1908 Rice Street.
4. Temporary Gambling - VFW Post 8901 at Ramsey County Fair
Adopted the following Resolution, approving temporary gambling for VFW Post 8901 at Ramsey County Fair,
July 12 - 16, 2000:
3
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 060
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY LAWFUL GAMBLING
VFW Post 8901 at Ramsey County Fair, Ramsey County Fairgrounds
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit for
temporary lawful gambling is approved for VFW Post 8901, to operate at the Ramsey County Fairgrounds,
2020 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application
for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the
Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota
Statute §349.213 and the City allows the Board to issue a permit before 30 days.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood,
Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
5. Temporary Gambling - St. Paul East Park Lions at Ramsey County Fair
Adopted the following Resolution, approving temporary gambling for St. Paul East Park Lions at Ramsey
County Fair, July 13 - 16, 2000.
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 061
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY LAWFUL GAMBLING
St. Paul East Park Lions Club at Ramsey County Fair, Ramsey County Fairgrounds
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit for
temporary lawful gambling is approved for St. Paul East Park Lions Club, to operate at the Ramsey County
Fairgrounds, 2020 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application
for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the
Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota
Statute §349.213 and the City allows the Board to issue a permit before 30 days.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood,
Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
6. Ramsey County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Agreement
Adopted the following Resolution with Ramsey County for community development block grant (CDBG)
0
funds:
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 062
SECOND AMENDMENT TO RAMSEY COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
The Joint Cooperation Agreement between the County of Ramsey and the City of Maplewood
MUNICIPALITY") commencing August 31, 1991, and the First Amendment to that Agreement, effective
July 1, 1997, (collectively "AGREEMENT ") is further amended as follows:
1. The effective date of this Second Amendment is July 1, 2000.
2. The AGREEMENT is amended by the addition of the following language:
A. By executing this AGREEMENT the MUNICIPALITY understands that is:
1. May not apply for grants from appropriations under the Small Cities or State Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG program; and
2. May participate in a Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME) Program only through the
AUTHORITY. Thus, even if the AUTHORITY does not receive a HOME formula allocation,
the MUNICIPALITY cannot form a HOME consortium with other local governments.
B. Both the AUTHORITY and MUNICIPALITY are obliged to take all actions necessary to assure
compliance with the AUTHORITY's I certification required by section 104(b) of Title I of the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended including Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964„ the Fair Housing Act, section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, and other applicable laws. The AUTHORITY is prohibited from funding
for activities, in or in support of, any cooperating unit of general local government that does not
affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impeded it actions to comply
with its fair housing certification, This provision is required because noncompliance by the
MUNICIPALITY may constitute noncompliance by the AUTHORITY which can, in turn, provide
cause for finding sanctions or other remedial actions by the Department,
C.. _;The MUNICIPALITY has adopted and is enforcing:
1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its
jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non - violent civil rights demonstrations; and
2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or
exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non - violent civil rights
demonstrations within jurisdictions.
3. Except as expressly modified herein, the AGREEMENT remains in full force and effect.
7. Acceptance of Grant Funds
Adopted the following Resolution, authorizing the Maplewood Police Department to accept and expend a
3,000 grant from Minnesota Join Together, and approved providing a notarized copy of the same to Minnesota
Join Together.
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 063
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING
THE MAPLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MINNESOTA JOIN
TOGETHER COALITION
WHEREAS: The City of Maplewood has long recognized the need to protect its young citizens from the
consequences of underage drinking; and,
WHEREAS: The City, in partnership with various federal, state and private agencies, consistently works
to provide assistance, guidance and information to young persons at risk in the community; and,
WHEREAS: The privately funded Minnesota Join Together Coalition, administered by the American
Medical Association, has extended to the Maplewood Police Department a grant of $3,000 to be spent
exclusively on efforts to reduce underage drinking; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED: That the Maplewood City Council does hereby authorize the Chief of Police, for and
on behalf of the Maplewood Police Department and the City of Maplewood, to accept and expend the
aforementioned grant for the purposes stated above; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Maplewood City Council encourages the Maplewood Police
Department, working in collaboration with the Minnesota Join Together Coalition, the Minnesota Department
of Public Safety, our neighborhood groups and Maplewood residents, to work diligently to reduce the incidence
of underage drinking in our community.
8. HRC Annual Report
Approved the 1999 Human Relations Commission Annual Report.
9. Disposal of Old Financial Records
Adopted the following Resolution so that the appropriate financial records can be destroyed.
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 064
WHEREAS, M. S.A. 138.17 governs the destruction of city records; and
WHEREAS, a list of records has been presented to the Council with a request in writing that
destruction be approved by the Council;
rol
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA;
1. That the Finance Director is hereby directed to apply to the Minnesota State Historical Society
for an order authorizing destruction of the records as described in the attached list.
2. That upon approval by the State of the attached application, the Finance Director is hereby
authorized and directed to destroy the records listed.
10. Transfer to Close Tilsen North Street Project
Approved the transfer of $21,244.54 from the General Fund to close Tilsen North Street Project 99 -05.
11. Transfer to Close Nine Improvement Project Funds
Approved the following interfund transfers and appropriate budget adjustments to close nine improvement
funds.
From To
Fund #Fund #Amount
523 560 46
523 590 22
523 598 20
523 568 172,321.78
523 404 259
550 404 10
553 404 51,903.74
588 404 15
593 404 46
599 404 42,726.45
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 7:00 P.M. (7:08 P.M.) Carver Elementary School Conditional Use Permit Revision (2680 Upper
Afton Road)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Paul Mueller presented the Planning Commission report.
7
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one was
heard.
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following Resolution, amending the conditional use permit for
playground and play area changes at Carver Elementary School, 2680 Upper Afton Road. Approval of this
permit amendment is based on the findings required by code and subject to the following conditions (additions
are underlined and deletions are crossed out):
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 065
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Independent School District No. 622 is requesting that Maplewood approve an
amendment to their conditional use permit to allow the following change:
To relocate the hard - surfaced outdoor basketball court area and the pea - graveled play area that are
behind the building to the front, just west of the existing parking lot.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2680 Upper Afton Road. The legal description is:
Beginning at a point twenty (20) rods west of the Northeast corner of the North Half of the Southeast
Quarter (N' /z of the SE 1/4) of Section One (1), Township twenty eight (28), Range Twenty two
22); thence South forty (40) rods; thence West forty (40) rods; thence North forty (40) rods; thence
East forty (40) rods to the point of beginning.
PIN 1- 28 -22 -41 -0005)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit amendment is as follows:
1. On May 1, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On May 22, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing
a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional
use permit amendment based on the building and site plans. The city approves this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with
the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into 'the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
10. The city council may waive any of the above requirements provided the council determines that the
balancing of public interest between governmental units would be best served by such a waiver.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans for building the 1995 building expansion stamped January 18,
1995 and the utility, grading and erosion control plans stamped March 9, 1995. The parking lot
expansion shall follow the plans stamped August 14, 1998. The proposed storage room addition,
folding -door enclosure addition and loading dock platform expansion shall follow the plans stamped
February 19, 1999. The proposed play area relocation shall follow the plans date - stamped April 14.
2000, subject to the applicant providing city staff with a proof of parking plan for the site that shows
at least 20 additional parking spaces. The director of community development may approve minor
changes.
2. The play area relocation must be started within one year after council
approval or the permit amendment shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on May 22, 2000.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - all
2. 7:00 P.M. (7:16 P.M.) Assessment Hearing - Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, City Project
99 -13
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report.
X
c. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings.
d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Raymond Kaeder, 1083 Sterling Street
Violet McSchannock, 1011 Bartelmy Lane
Lynn Johnson, 1070 Mary Street
Robert Johnson, 1060 Mary Street
Lorraine Cummings, 1069 Mary Street
Kevin and Sarah Johnson, 1076 Mary Street
Vern Hogan, 1023 Bartelmy Lane
Jen Peterson, 1026 Mary Street
e. "Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following Resolution, adopting the assessment roll for Bartelmy
Acres Neighborhood Streets, Project 99-13:
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 066
ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council has
met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of
Bartelmy Acres neighborhood Streets as described in the files of the city clerk as Project 99 -13,
and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the
lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by
the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in
January 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.0 percent per annum from the date of the
adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the
entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2000. To each subsequent
installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the
future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying
additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon
any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the
improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to
10
such properties make such assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be
served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but
which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council,
as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion
of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements.
5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall
be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
3. 7:30 P.M. (7:45 P.M.) Sprint PCS Telecommunications Monopole (2500 Hudson Place)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Paul Mueller presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Boardmember John LaCasse presented the Community Design Review Board report.
f. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Jean Ashely, 2466 Brookview Drive
Am Nguyen, 2455 Brookview Drive
Terry Degraw, 2500 Hudson Place
Gered Johnson, Sprint PCS Representative
Robert Schlentz, 3M Representative
g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Collins moved to table the item until the June 12, 2000 Council Meeting.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
4. 7:45 P.M. (8:44 P.M.) Maplewood Fire Station (Clarence Street)
Acting City Manager Haider informed the audience that staff has incomplete information at this time and that
they will be re- notified if and when the matter goes to a city council for any changes to the new fire station. No
action was taken.
11
Councilmember Collins moved to take no action
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. B artelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, Project 99 -13
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report.
b. Mayor Cardinal asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter.
No one was heard.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to adopt the following Resolution, accepting the bid from Dave Perkins
Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $387,516.85 for the Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, City Project 99.
13.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Hazelwood Improvements, Project 99 -07 - Assessment Objections
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to take the actions recommended in the staff report summarized below) for
the proposed assessments for Hazelwood Street Improvements, Project 99 -07.
1. Take no action to change the proposed assessment for 2460 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29- 22 -13-
0098.
2. Take no action to change the proposed assessment for 2451 Germain Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -13 -0086.
3. Take no action to change the proposed assessment for 2555 Hazelwood Street, PIN's: 10- 29- 22 -21-
0004, -0005 & - 0008.
4. Approve disability hardship for the property at 2410 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -13 -0051,
upon a qualified submittal to the city clerk of the proper disability hardship documentation by the
property owner.
5. Approve disability hardship for the property at 2615 Bittersweet Lane, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -11 -0028, upon
a qualified submittal to the city clerk of the proper disability hardship documentation by the property
owner.
12
6. Approve senior citizen deferment for the property at 2566 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29- 22 -13-
0046, upon a qualified submittal to the city clerk of the proper disability hardship documentation by
the property owner.
7. Take no action to change the assessment proposed for 2420 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29- 22 -13-
0052, due to lack of information on the assessment hearing appeal form.
8. Reduce the assessment for 2467 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -24 -0013, by $6450, from 2 x
4000 + 2 x $600 + 1 x $1850 = $1 1.050.00 to 1 x $4000 + 1 x $600 + 1 X $0 = 4600, with the
requirement that a future lot split request be denied until after such time the age and condition of the
street would justify an open cut utility trench, as approved by the city engineer.
9. Reduce the assessment for 1522 E. Brooks Avenue, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -24 -0012 by $6450, from 2 x
4000 + 2 x $600 + 1 x $1850 = .$11.050.00 to 1 x $4000 + 1 x $600 + 1 X $0 = 4600, with the
requirement that a future lot split request be denied until after such time the age and condition of the
street would justify an open cut utility trench, as approved by the city engineer.
10. Reduce the assessment for 2480 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -13 -0097 by $1850, from 2 x
4000 + 7 x $600 + 1 x $1850 = $14,050.00 to 2 x $4000 + 7 x $600 + 1 X $0 = $12.200.00.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - all
2. Deer Management
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the staff recommended deer management program.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Transfer of Funds for New Fire Station
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
b. Fire Chief Lukin presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Collins moved to authorize the finance director to transfer of approximately $60,000 from the
Gladstone Fire Department Fund to the new station pro' ect.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
13
2. Budget Appropriation - East County Line Fund
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
b. Fire Chief Lukin presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the purchases for the Maplewood Fire Department as listed in the
a 2enda report.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
3. 2001 - 2005 Capital Improvement Plan (4 Votes)
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
b. Finance Director Faust presented the specifics of the report and showed the 2001 -2005 C.I.P.
video.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 067
WHEREAS, the 2001 -2005 Capital Improvement Plan coordinates the timing and financing of major
equipment purchases and construction projects, and
WHEREAS, the 2001 -2005 C.I.P. is a planning tool for City staff and elected officials, and
WHEREAS, it is important to follow the construction and financing schedule on pages 1 -8 and 1 -9 in
the C.I.P. in order to fully utilize the City's engineering staff and minimize the need for consultant engineers,
and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 2001 -2005 C.I.P. is hereby adopted as a planning
document, and
BE IT FURTHER-RESOLVED, the construction and financing schedule on pages 1 -8 and 1 -9 in the
C.I.P. will be followed to the greatest extent possible.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
14
1. Mayor Cardinal announced that there will be a joint meeting between the City Council and the Parks
and Recreation Commission at the Maplewood Nature Center on June 8, 2000 at 6:00 p.m.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Fire Chief Lukin gave an update on the New Fire Station
O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Cardinal moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:17 P.M.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Ken Roberts, Substitute Clerk
15
r
r-
t
11j i
i
S•w1 t:
1
1 d .af•tl
1 -: -tip•.' ; +ti -
J
wv •asjrrFFfzi
t:,i 7%•Ir
i
1 •sbe
l } jdapyf S.
Y
yh+ hy°
ol
Oz
rej jF, re
J` [ :: %' •fib•"
I ,
1
i
ter:
ice '
I`
rte
fI
b
r
p f
b r t rY.
f i:•. '••+.:'• vywb + !Jr ,. rF., iC, F ..'7Frai"ew.'S•iYsia•,rseS..t'
tt 1 t T 1'ti1I .• 1• 111 /n i l 1 • `Irf • 1rF' •:R YJs'i ••f t.t a s R .sl L s t :aR R • tt
1 1a!J • . • utY! rtffTIt ,ItS
f ftJili f•' + . , .;Si1Dt 1h ` fitl1t4t1t •t1v' S •/ 1'.
9 1ifli'•'iia¢fsO ;': •• - - .•.C.s, . \' \,L' Lt1A 1ey'r_':++iYlsalr•' ,s ° + +,iae ,.+
i LiY • 1 JI 1r4 ,wrt • tI
wtl°b Jr ,r •• _ ,N,r ,o->w rt .r^" :`! Ft,.
a f "•r. +t1 •trnsr f •tl 4tt "i • °t 1 a r• 11'rJ ` 1'i • t • • 'I •'• i11Ii'' • 1 1 ta r! • I 1 •A• __..•r 1 ;t! • if 1.. /., +.. r .r/ -..a. 1.. • ! _w_' J i 1. 4 iR , t,'triA :'••'.'_:.. . •
w. p1 ,1 ^• °•,, ,' ",,. • "' -: .• tit+ < /.,,v'w•l :a -J ..V
4 • t` rJ-G
YE'N /gFa° r:, %/ - ls Y s .ridt r.. Vy]/e t t1.t ''.'L'ryy J.. i1pS'.'Yt 4'J1' i I' .•r ^ 6>. ; 4 • • "\ar l.s' Y L A1 • L fri" it t . \ •,I r' I'•.:.i 1 .O 1 ' 7• ' G .Y f... /xYr'.M•'. •.- t• ) t t .e l ,•• Yrw / ,t k 4• Y - 1, tIr i ) 't „)• • ri { ! h.t Y a •Ir ` rnkr !r1 7 t "n'0 111 '1.1t• a 'ra1fY qf11YI' •4 at.. .,rt 's - / ,:, a,' ,•i • ifs. d "r / pr - f. l.' .R, '. .r d i +I;•..','µ, a; , t't Jl • .i, .. +. +` J r', f .> [ , <., r.fa„ rll, t: \t a,. '•;r 1,••. •,t ,l t !.1+ e•'•/ f,1. 11. t , etir. 1:• 1. •, li t` nt ° FI >.] a rh1I • ' I ' I +:\' , t ' r '.a + • + J 1 • ', I r 4 • S - I + ] \ ,j(1 iatjt1j1. III '•' t ,,. f,! t • •t• • \'f ... ... .. •1;. . • :rl s;I t f,. 'il t 1 .s 1 • +' /, I''It 7 ik1•.. . > ,r, '• y: IL:/ L '. ' t kt„r1f rYt • ; Ilir ° ! /, \ •r, }I '• 1tt11 !`i'fI i•t •:. 1, .it : ' 1: Vii'r. t1S1 '1' ! 71tlr ']aY.. f(1tl "19i 711!!• ay + a1 y by fi .!t '1 ''L a!: '.l111 at l' ••11t• \1 . r .., ,.•' ••7t {• tL :JP -G,.. .tltf >t [>. 1 /M ° }_
t +
e7 1• t , Sr • :l • ! •titt,. - ia ' F ., }1;rr( •a Jfpy. .,.f/ .,l: J'. +a 'rlil'', 1t t - .1 +:r' ,di /'IQ" - .• ' t'11 r o . Fdy t:.. .t ^ /,,. t 1 '. .L. ,,p Ye' Y. S+ ` l• • t.t`'w• p .rrl ., r a: '7 >:o.r ,J ..rJ °. ,t ••i`n .+'a i`., •e. - +;a•nR0+ •lA a] ., "V'..,. L .. , + yr" * ^. ra • A t`. !J, tt v ,.t.• .. S ','! R '•s'- o. , fi v l .rr' • • , •t'r.d ,j a ae ..1. .• , i t '•[ •' a i 'S ? •. R• r,r o - e• t• eia,yRe•. it•,1 s.1 4, • t • .'d, n 7J ff 1 4 Q. q • !•, . y r i^ y 't .4 f • t I 'd k^ • A / t7 b•,'. ^w e : >.., c 6 ?•!> t° t +r Y. •° 4/ t i yy
aids +a.yy - '•Y•thb• t•. irigoPV••w.: : • e wt7 • Y ,.. a.Rih1b•r , a7 ', :; 3s!• .tt .'"ar •A.. ..+ 6A;:• tt fiu •y t ' .,¢ dt., ••{ 4' ,c .e >.. 2 •.,s ,p Rt a :'I `' " h .If +•yl .t• . 't" >, 44•. " • •rl '•r 1' wDL. - Tr 7r ., `, r. .J•t -.1 4 •• i t ° ' i 1'.1 , .r. t ( „t
lt i! kl l "•. i - ,,. If. 't''I, r• ".M 1., ,t/ t•lj.. Asy rrr' .,+r , • tt 1,f+ 1: ,! >. . 9d"' 'I .1 1.• ,. t.7, r'. • t T • tk. :•.,.
1riw!'1.: ,.r.L: s•r MF . 0'1 :. ,••d1Y+b.w.«Y.U..'b '. .ir "i. : >'.' 1
R.w.eu tr "oT'1 1 +r•f•; 1, .•...'.,', 'a' ,. 'r' ;. ', -tl .. .t. s. .>'. 'Fit.), •4!`r . / J. ,! i `Y e1 -at' y' rtrf: 's'. trSV. 1 . 1' S'it.e !ti- tt;.'6 t.lv t r Isla Y rti.6J7:c1, . •:i : 't.il! 7 Fxrr t.+. ?,. +G,1 i r.t. SF S.' , •
f1
Date n; , a
Endorse ""S
CER TIFICA TE OF RE CO s
ejeir`tir, D ~
hill
S'r wry Ir r !•
333331}• • 7 • • biY'•:' ' V,i' Y •:.
w:Y•I ALtp\n:t '' t Jt 1 f / ] 11U +q.
ilt?' • yr
f { rSr i
1. !J •, l i. a
y
t! " 11 s att•t •
rt t +ll, i
f ti it Y
A' "S jJt1 jj .t )) ! 1 j ,a { //.. t :`• ` ` // ,t ,t LL , ,1 t p ,t .1 s .l .t 4.•i { w w L,1 a A 4 .Lt J+ '1•.1' J. (.7J4i`.! l.'1 . L32 :.,;': 'Ij U L.. L.1•-1Fi] 1...'t,t i Ca L.1viJf /J L.ILr 1.1 ", J`. ; / } CJ ., .. .' '> C. , •'.ri [J i'_t t74wi <1FL.J 'L1•L)•, L.S LA. 1 ., t ^ ' J v J. t -' yj , l •' -t'. •..i} KfAr+ awvWMt•° I• tl• IY\ tDVJ> bMlJlt SF'.DVaRwI•YV•MtRV'.YY,•i %v +•W.'nitt•YaYtWWrw•R' MTM. ^t4'VMx•,+T!•vsW N'•rtQW"."ralLdhLti•.•- ':•m+. , .v'•r't"e m.m •. - .... -w t /-S 1.a '•/ J°[p,rt )yyr . - . 'f7• •t^ _:. _. 6rc . ^! Mni w.w DrYrx`r - :y»W " ^.: Vtt x 3'7J9 r , t' n: -cr• •evllttt .w ,,s »..: ,; _ A
t 4 • 1'JI•'S1s• - 17'e -v S1 ,1 7
r • v t.yt ,A !t ` Pa'. 4`1 1 •,l • at1r •twRYtt •r..A a`J• k L'i4f '/J .h J a l l ice'a I'm vfi '1Q •f •t f 1rR yt ^ t )a 71.O A A , - t •i $ t', t Je 6las '8 a' +I t Sa. c0 ° 't• 4 s'4 t Q /fS: t .• +' 3 Y 1t RV i+i : t !• r s • 7•Yd8 it - 16 ! Fr e. :tl•1 •F f • li F 1 •L t-w 't• rr n i'r r r aa0 '• Y t t• -IItJF4 ' 9 Q•ldt: t e1f•tk . + :ki tL •r t >t rs/. d11 • if t11. "1 sUi1l .1• -- yr • ( -+I° liN` i • S- :t
i,,],i• 111 •.,: i' tll.. e,• ", tti= ','r• LJ.. • +: .J S,te.Jt1,-,.. eti., >t,r y - cti /6 %A1, 1 rt', a+a
o
r•t ./: :I.tr•(' tt •• •elt ''la.,P• •.].. `:tit X ••t ' tt .N` .cy , t';rt • -• 7 • %et ; ;• t .; J.:.: '. t,. t!• t,,.•. ] 1 :4''• ! ?. 2':' , s r i^:r. j' d..
td IS t', ''i li I.• .'. '1 A', 77i %i: ] °t' ,.t, -9 !: (tfi'. .r7 ,A . ' t i K T.• • 1 • • ;1t .,,/y ,, 1 ]a t, /; r.t !l1:,.',t ` •/ +''.' 'Y .7. ., t _ ,. ••a 11 rT tl . T\>i'/ J' ; + •. ]..•t Jl . l •1• i'Jfl- +_ ' 't'1 f. . Tr• ]] .it l + il' "'J• k .1 t s1t t +J'f t ri i1 } e'1' ''3 \'Jd 1. •! 1t ••)' rr r f)5 .+•'ti1.•. : %Ji .`" ! t
j dI ] \'b /c• `.• +i ti• :., tt.. .I,'. r5 TS', `i: i11 + <: :''s_ •,.t .\. ;y:': i:." 'ht r•'.ir' .!•J•: r, ,l 1 $•
S +. r t" .:_ t +'ret!.t .:il tt'• ::y. •.i 'a r' !• arr. , I+ tit t. • "w•." •Ii .1 ».+ .r. ;i .3•'•,!." :, •1. .'.S1•' .4;" J t ,I 'I , / - 1ta ]. ,61 1,' i .t + +kt •t. t:'. n:..'t' .1 •' •S• : ^ • '1' [. •••w:'r'.°t Y i•"t•rr :. lr .y, _
1 •>lS }a Q to !:•. •19 • { YS" i \pit• '•.aT•SJ •> ! t7• .t ttta .atr r• t• !tAlP • G PtYItt'i M. • • • -{ D r - F Y . .':l • 4 [ r ^
J + lY art , ` ,: - lfr... .. i .. _
tf• "•y„lii,.fr • LSYe"•'Y'' f' ,rn.' Kati°..•.,.. > IOh .. {. wr r ' •tx,ye. s+' ,` . '•'RI r• ' - '.... a -, ..
WHEREAS, the Girl Scout Silver Award is the highest award in Girl '• ''
Scoutin available to Cadette Girl Scouts andO
i. ?fit
J'
WHEREAS, to achieve this high honor, Cadet Girl Scouts must meetf _
three rere uisites in the areaspq of leadership, personal development, and
community service and 1V msµ.
WHEREAS, Cadette Girl Scouts must plan and implement a
significant leadership project involving 30 hours of community service over
Allafour -month eriod • and
r t r• :,Tart
F _ - I
NO W THEREFORE BE IT RESOL VED, that 1, May Robert
Cardinal, and the Maplewood City Council do her congratulatep y g t 4
LINDSEY CHEZIK or her hard work dedication and commitment in
earning the Girl Scout Silver Award. a
si -; r • 1 J. t
t.: wtR * * S '
a ti, :'l.;aJe•
1 ! 1fr •s iJt
1 ) t
1 M
y '
Mayor Robert Cardinal Date'J: ..
Ill
rMN.a,,h 0"'1'•'a\a , ., Vln rg,.R.,.. a , R. rT. ,„
r i /'' ay:•\ .'•. .f' ''! ". '•iMis, t >. :,;', a•/ +i °. d; ,• i: fX.•' w .. i '4 (!''i•iI • 44, \ 1 i r r' n1' • \4 /'. f.! •^ ft , • Y t•1•: r •fi,. mar 'A. I - -IfP°;,5. ! > Ria ' ri 4 44 t1t 2•' y.,_ . / / . r • :/f. I• I -'yt/ a,; .'w'trt.0 a,••, '!Ia`: !/•l'!w_•!','a a •!•, ' t r f1 'be \\ r•` „f •• g'.7 Mlas: ^ya,u •. N /' J R • g r, • i't '`,.\ ,, /. r ;
t . • :.h , ' , .t t`^•/YM•!rn•: • :r,,, a :, i' + i1 .•, t11Lt /1 I Rpa p'1t ,•1','•r •a... :h'1 .rNYA ,T ./J• /1•Y Y> It 1 1. \. 1r•r,]r,, ,I . .r ,I 1 •M \; ,Y'Ira7vlCYW Ii ' \•.a a lf t / / • + .`! ::a • L',,>, s { •.a ,., aY .,a { a u' ,/J. s F t t °tr 1 rf 1 •.•.. •i'!f // , • l !r a' 1 •,1 r i •i: "•. if , 4.. r, • {/. 1 fat . I .,t / a 14 •'; `••+ ," ^l, i 1 •,'r f' 1. Y 1 •. '• Frr r• p 7r , .!> "l •r ,J, f e of R• •• i A. ' rt• t :a111YIa ai IJ" f e't . 2 ` iI t 1, t f f ^ S ' "': •• •5` l1 /. la 1 tt ' ,'I 4` • • 1 1 t! { {•r (• t .l- t rt 1"tf ir :A ,'1 + i •1. +et ",f t • .'r • 1 1 .t •1 1/ x ..'^',. I h, Y/ '' • •t u•.y •' • 17•. D:• r,l'r.,t '•. :. .f 1v. „t ..^•ta: ' .°r. ' 1 , .\ I4! 1i Rn" 4J >•''' .1 `T r.i • •rr' T •1 Iri: i+.•T,•..a. ! i'•'r_'w f f • i ° 'ie ..r/•• :1 r1 1 t l .. f/ J. 1 .af •r' , ° • P 1, •i >.i r, t f.` I( r 1 ..,; t • {. / I.a i.t r' 1 s l,i : t, /• f! yl • . I,r t •f .T.. ~•e ,f.: tL i { .,s •41 .. A•. .+ •: Y, ,st Jr iiY •II r !;h..wr .rI 1 I ri,,.,: Ir 1 ,TV fi..l • 7 , Ir, •• °'`; rtA{ i'!Tl r. ' •ef. 1r'1 °•) r..th. • /r a• • 1. '1 .iii• .ir r ri: ":':.•, / .r rl ^'• ',,. 111ll /I•', 1 a,\ f r ' 1 .i 11 . }w {rr• 1t:, ,,\ to .I • n1 rJl 1 ,•1: r/ '' • r' iJ• 1r ! l 1 •. `at•.4' v I Ir If 1,J \\! \• 1 ' i .' ./J 1 r0 O 'f 1, •a t / •1, \ , \. 1, /' , 1r /4 l _ +{ •A'' • Ili `'t. 4 / l , i • 1i „• r 1• I• at11Y •1 • t t t f..tF 1 • 1 t • aice`
1
1 l /• " t.I 1 !'
J r ' r1 r It: > r /, IF rr . o t Is '.. ' Is '•t i '• ' J , ; ; '•S le .J, ,w.,tI „ 1[p, .`,t ',rl ,• IIFU: .f •IFt r fri ttl Illil 4 ''t ., /t 1t4c. <.Fr., .r. ,: , il ;.elfr.i Itit1• 'rt/ Ir /1LIIr '7 •I,III r• I3tM• i1Y 1!: .A, ,I /tll 1 < 1 y ' ,t.tt• _,+ ye .r, pj !^ ..
till!1`} a,t Rl ,•>` /l 1J1
ilflr 1 •r'^a •rrt:'
t ,y. " - '\}'S a" ! i T.,*'r0• 711 ':e 'f' r, tn1 ctn, ""^F sr ,t ttY,• ,a :. •tTt) '•: •, rs.'.If I 1111x. • ,/ rj• •17r t1t r'yri \' <. :N., •:efdl tb • ' Lrl• rr's ^ : '. ff .11• ' ia, , f'o ,V'. .rtr. k1•. J' Y ,rl11 V x171/ ^t„ •p 444 `
I
JlrO N 'IIILI ,r tt' a! ggtY /•'611 •. /
D a ,r/', •, t: a r4 1,1' ¢ } , .1,• '.,le! P7 `. a 41 ' •! • qt4 /rr 'e r.'. t1t ty q •qT l!! T r *' TIF • :atti' •t ° 6Ft t . :r,l: a :, tt, p ` °ri9. "if •r a . rFSt . tet• <o. ,?)L :r > le q' . •,.r. ' . qea > ';.,. rN• R t s } i :r. +,i ® / iFel ' +:;r' f : ..rr 1 9t . 'irtt . / ,'q! .:]R v' ' \'" rtq l+yy,4 ;1 ;t - rJ ri9h' /RiA }pb ar,a ., fir,.• - f{ .tb e, l ;'fJy F '..jmg a, t,t it ;. et ra *!' 11. , .st f, (..; !.rlP l. t h/t1'Z: r;.0.k :1• f t f >, ••y.•t,n .,. .•ARp A fr• 'rz a ! ,' apKOfe;r9' .a s >,b ;k•r: s.- p1 ,Y.' :e p! } > . . 3 •>! .4a r a4!! lf; •ct i i,, o , uk a t iok,y Aa! af.l e •,, r' p 4„ ,e yi' 9 !, •, i A. q f a ,1 f .r 1 • °b p s. .. .'.r.. s>Ya d °;. .. : bff . 1q Ns b ,P f 7 i V.O. . ~' '' ra , f Sa r 1 `Ct' „a >ll t 4 8p:... Kf t t t>. a .n .L,a9 1 e, /T' i• ,. 1', K' aJf ' /,7! ialr -e h !• y6;r' + M .t• t, r s. " "; ,r 9 „` t -11,, .! 71, '1f1 • i >r , .' '1.. t1•,1 aY ,4t..l .Qa.'' ..t .. , > gi37 • t>. i' ,t4. `I. -1 tr. i - '1 • 1' ': • Ld'w `• - ..y':.. r,l:.'rit t. 'f,' 1, t .e. , i i :,1, :,I t t ,,1 •.a. 11 11 fl t .. ,•i : 1.t s'. «u:- I”' *'Y•, r' .': :
tfe1 . . i •I. :•,1 ' /' , „i 1 yi. ,A' Ipi. r rs ` "4c"t,, . f. dl et:,.,$' {,fit' •.
4 s ' Jlr . 1, ! is t 9 •>Q' f Y"
S r • 1 r , „1 .1 • CC +h. t . rtY o ,,t•R' ^;.'.a t • 1. r. .,al' • , , ,;; .y , ,r•. at+' 3 •T llt% ..t' `. tl •i' " ." 'vf .'a .J..t fji' .,t ,+j.. s,' .t•l :i' ai.i •a ).7 r_/,• •sa :•, e` %;vwb :G •... { r r.oa.« :J.. r,- '., i.ji ,;'• '! t i4 +. 4... urafJSfAwWu' FL`.:.:.+.. i. 1] Y.. '._.....bli.'..:.:..:ir1.,,b. j' rwAa :.S JI., - . ' ri ` .wr(w x.,.:. ?I. »:.._. yf:....:.....iio.•..r»e•N. ac.. -w. 1. o'. .. /eei•n.cYari's:.'. ..i'tk ::. _ rr..:......a .-.! ,.fr: + 't,. s.., :.aw':,' a.'. 'i y
a• w _••..• .. n rsfJwv.v.r• -.w-ww +e...r+,•. -•' #: . a. i jwy - .. ' . "r„ '. . tom"„"r q -.. , ., . . ` t ^• ^+ t- -r . r n ,1'f .•..•.... • r.,. .a.....,,r.,.t»,.Yw...°1....1f. :y .. : .W.
i «.• •;:.:t''""' •.,'•t a d t F f.n c+ 1 '!'" . f ;1t/.v....V.l.'.6. ,,blrp.t7..Sler4..i,J.Ylt .'p t. .Y..7. +.t,e.,>S?I:r.tvs,.l'. .. re'l, r J -' fr ta+ i'`'o+ p 1 '44 Y•IS ~o' %fC1Y ,f ! t k.., t' "r e 8 "l. .Y. . . v 'r, •. •
r. lf: .J ^ r i. . r'. 4.•'r_ t, / 'r.•.Y; • .„ r f9'Sf. ' t t_ ; Y,.. v _ .: /' ..... _ .::a _..t..'•'Y.It.t'r,\ .i.l r,.Y f ,l?9 J r1 - _ .. I. _ ... _' _. .t "" ,. .F ,..,• G+ f . 5 - ps
t •% i .
t
CER TIFICA TE OF RECOGNITION ;
I Alf.
3 '
Saan,'jr,r >tip' . ) •• 4 ` rt 1
i h highest award in Girl rWHEREAStheGirllScoutGoldAwardisthehe /yam s ' t„ '' •%
jam ?r. .a zNye :,,'. :.:
Scouting available to Senior Girl Scouts; and
WHEREAS, to achieve this high honor, Girl Scouts must meet three
prerequisites in the areas of leadership, skill development, and career
exploration; and
7 '-
r A =, a'R 7 l
WHEREAS, Girl Scouts must also plan and implement a significant
leadership project involving 50 hours of community service over a our-
month period • and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Mayor Robert` fr'ar
Cardinal, and the Maplewood City Council do hereby congratulate 1
JENNIFER DAHL or her hard work, dedication, and commitment in
earning the Girl Scout Gold Award.
1 N 4 t •• ° r
t ,
r•"1
Y9
I
S •
t .a
Mayor Robert Cardinalinal Date
Z I
r1' i 4' "'! i' 't F \'l A;rtr• 1- f. •1• i'^ J f' .1 '., /t:..'.1 , ~ t { •' ).• • 'f 11'•' '4' t.,A '1'r'f ' A , • 1 1Y ! 0 f iAL A /J(t ! a _1 hh r i^ o tr 1 4, t h " 1 r t, 1.14 .l 1 t''!. t 1 . .31 r, }. 4T, t. f, .t .t -, i ,t t•1, `v• 1'' e •; a-4i ..1 ''! i eR,a (1 l it A `/,.U!41 ... L)a. 4t 't. !!.:`/ > 41. {, ..r`i., ., - .Ar +i it.l..tt,i', .15.• „!a f1 .1 .. -. e. .J . ..i, J J •..•1 GD I., i .t: i .,. :.,, ..1. 'f` t.rA wrrrlG +,J,mero 1: rw. aawnvf, Rr4ra++ rtw9lYtr' vwrtNK ',*ws••»r :•J.vI••r,a:'t.-' •r r. ise- rlr.:• Z> erlelr »r,uT.•rrMl:>tre- .+w••r •. wfr. r'' •• =i•i•. •, . w: s.' "..+•.• ... .:.5,:: , }r a I •S'l,•(.rp 4, q
M•tlpiTr••"w;•r , •+• „ ••, fir• "!'fit \'.."""4>TV'1aw.•'at+raP •' o „'rt!le -• o r..YtrtvT^Na.F ^nr..•. .. yttrr •:,%R <Kran .. 5::, .. .. 1, . , .. ., ” YC.• w. '^'1^iri•L•l;`R'm':1.,..gy.. «•. ,\: , K,p ••• ,v ;,'. w•ct. :'>3•T .••, ,., .. .. nt'a• -. k . { ` s r ! r 1 `` i
44' •r tia • 1 } 'iF1•ter.•}'f1it -z J-a I ,1 7 I1 '3 -f Ek' Dx • 'as rInCp• ?. Z 1'f 9 q' 1•r1, ' 0. '. 1'`n. tS 4: .7' 7r stt' "Y 3"` 'b. } .4 f ti9 i B'. .. t >'3i' .r. .`I"d .fS L R..1 S Z t. Y 7 ! tIdnAr. °s F• •4 ! 1.. 16n' •l ..tt `.',9 -' .b . }.'r S F .h.k tf'r f- :>... 1 ,,d1 • ! t , 4• i ..t F. T -!: 3't• 0„ 4•ai ,t '1:• > ' ° 6 .1. d • t\I :ij 4`' .14 "1 >i 4 1 a•1 .er l'. 9 .f" .N •4i L. !• 3 4'r
X
1 ,
f '•,- t , /1 1 s. 4' ^::'• , -r' >7 pr• `7.. ^ •. i T +', • {.4•,
it YI' ,•f l' 1r t.l yt '{4.- ,1 1 ` V, ' ••t; s, , '"t••F+ "'+• ^ l i
S t %' J •,t .' '•IY rl 7, ri • it ,r, ? SF ` `fit f. .. , '1:.11 ' r ' -t { v,. ra, -e.J .1': e t 7;T... •aC, :r' r !7t• "Y t • a a• rrl TfF • !f - .I l1J .1: l•'' W 4 Pt111 '! 1t! ! I 1t • -i } 4 I Y t Yrrreatr4la 3r1. !f iJtifffii a 1ra'1 r li { Trl , .. y11lI ,. ".( F \f , - _l+.• t - fit t. .7. ..at' t': 't ,. +4.' 1'J 1 1 Y.. ,,r` It, X71 ,w - I., . / v'
Ir r t .t;, t tL .,••'','k -f•,. ' 1 . 1! :t, s . \ : .e. .Y•..1 7' . +'r+• -, a - '1.. , I
J• `t t t Y• ttt•5 • >'ft.. T:D C qf'• t a•
Pr fat •> : S ?,'. = 3 . e'., i '`,\. . at . wJi di -• ! _.. ' "•, ' :' '
n '>i >.'
V " ' \ '•.,,,.
r'' r.rrf' ,,L. afa =w,n ...: .,. J ' •:,fir .. _... ,x %r`JF R, ,..y,,. ., + ... - :e.
r r ! 1 , • tttt > >tit1 !••1 t 11
s 0Ds:i e kiNheM1' I
i iliir • ;t }t i }I r tt/if'i• iii l,rr,.e ;o :.'.'11t ., /r': 131111,; '! I lI 1 \•:.I Y 'e1l ,1 Ia• l ! / rf -, J• 1 I 1•,11 .1 !It !! 5
r 311iIIij •
art sItlI Y 11I7.r•t 11r ! > 1Y
r• If fie• Vii, ta t, .r r •,4r0 • 1 . Jr.2a •fafr,r •t} s r ,r- I 5
a I '
AGENDA NO. G -1
AGENDA REPORT
Acdon by CowcH
TO: City Council
Date
FROM: Finance Director k, Endoned
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Modified
DATE: June 2, 2000
Rejected
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The Acting City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
PAVART P-
34,714.22 Checks #8305 thru #8307 dated 5 -15 thru 5 -19 -00
368,584.11 Checks #49754 thru #49870 dated 5 -23 -00
176,548.24 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 5 -15 thru 5 -22 -00
35,051.31 Checks #49873 thru #49952 dated 5 -30 -00
1,159,855.62 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 5 -23 thru 5 -30 -00
103,534.58 Checks #8308 thru #8315 dated 5 -30 thru 6 -1 -00
159,357.89 Checks #49955 thru #50036 dated 6 -6 -00
623,788.29 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 5 -31 thru 6 -5 -00
2,661,434.26 Total Accounts Payable
P A VR OT _T -
305,799.74 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 5 -26 -00
23,213.78 Payroll Deduction check #78708 thru #78713 dated 5 -26 -00
329,013.52 Total Payroll
2,990,447.78 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions on the
attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary.
hu
Attachments
C:\OFFICE\WP-DOCS\AGENDA\APCL0005.JUN
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1
05/22/00 11:32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
8305 05/15/00 341706 HERITAGE BANK US SAVINGS BONDS 4/28 & 5/12 600.00 600.00
8306 05/16/00 722200 P.E.R.A.P/R DED REMIT 5-12 -00 14,652.23
P/R DED REMIT 5 -12 -00 18,493.99 33,146.22
8307 05/19/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 968.00 968.00
49754 05/23/00 MAPLEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP REF- WALL /GRD 2980 WHITE BEAR A 53,300.00
REF-WALL /GRD 2980 WHITE BEAR A 1,917.56 55,217.56
49755 05/23/00 FREDRICKS CONST REFUND - GRADING 1854 BEEBE RD 2,500.00
REFUND - GRADING 1854 BEEBE RD 164.66 2
49756 05/23/00 PAM SARNE REFUND - SWIM 40.00 40.00
49757 05/23/00 ST PASCALS REFUND - MAY 12TH PROGRAM 30.50 30.50
49758 05/23/00 ROGER BERAN REFUND - SR GOLF LEAGUE 20.00 20.00
49759 05/23/00 HAMLINE UNIVERSITY REFUND - ROOM RENTAL 40.00 40.00
49760 05/23/00 LUCINDA DUDECK REFUND - MONTHLY MEMBERSHIP 40.00 40.00
49761 05/23/00 LORI JOHNSON REFUND - TINY TOTS TUMBLING 33.00 33.00
49762 05/23/00 MN DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES REFUND - 00001018 P CHARBONEAU 157.79 157.79
49763 05/23/00 UNITED HEALTHCARE INS CO REFUND - 00004135 W BAUER 79.52 79.52
49764 05/23/00 MEDICARE REFUND - S WENTWORTH 98016783 281.30 281.30
49765 05/23/00 010463 A T & T LONG DISTANCE 4/13/00 153.24
PERSONAL CALLS 34.70 187.94
49766 05/23/00 010482 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC HOSE /FITTING 45.54 45.54
49767 05/23/00 010590 ACCURATE ELECTRIC MOTOR SRV REPAIR OZONE CIRC PUMP 175.60 175.60
49768 05/23/00 010650 ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS VOICE MAIL - NATURE CTR /MALL 28.60
VOICE MAIL - NATURE CTR /MALL 28059 57.19
49769 05/23/00 020405 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL MEDIC OXYGEN CYL DENTAL 368.77
MEDIC OXYGEN 51.94
MEDIC OXYGEN 60.49 481.20
49770 05/23/00 021200 AMERICAN FASTENER OF MN, INC.E RING ASSORTMENT 190.41 190.41
49771 05/23/00 021225 AMERICAN IRRIGATION & TURF SUP MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 44.18 44.18
49772 05/23/00 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MATS 37.88 37.88
1
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2
05/22/00 11:32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
49773 05/23/00 021465 AMERICAN RED CROSS JR MANION 348.00 348.00
49774 05/23/00 021700 AMOCO OIL COMPANY FUEL & OIL 33.92 33.92
49775 05/23/00 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.PATROL /BOARDING FEES 651.96 651.96
49776 05/23/00 041005 ARDEN SHOREVIEW ANIMAL HOSP K -9 VET SERVICES 107.53 107.53
49777 05/23/00 041100 ARRIGONI BROTHERS CO LAND IMPROVEMENT 69,390.93
LAND IMPROVEMENT 3,469.55-65,921.38
49778 05/23/00 061100 BANNIGAN & KELLY P.A.LEGAL SERVICES - APRIL 2000 9,720.13 9,720.13
49779 05/23/00 061630 BARTZ, PAUL MEAL - DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TRNG 8.00 8.00
49780 05/23/00 070445 BELDE, STAN K -9 HANDLER 35.00 35.00
49781 05/23/00 080925 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS MTHLY WATER UTIL 1830 46.80
MTHLY WATER UTIL 1902 18.00
MTHLY WATER UTIL 1530 5.40
MTHLY WATER UTIL 1177 5.40
MTHLY WATER UTIL 2501 12.60
MTHLY WATER UTIL 63 14.40
MTHLY WATER UTIL 1685 5.40
MTHLY WATER UTIL 1845 5.07
MTHLY WATER UTIL 2100 683.94 797.01
49782 05/23/00 110325 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS RADIO REPAIR /SHOP SUPPLIES 41.40 41.40
49783 05/23/00 120400 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO.EXPANSION JOINT 68.48 68.48
49784 05/23/00 151335 COMPRESSAIR & EQUIPMENT CO.SCBA DOT BOTTLES 7 7,355.85
49785 05/23/00 180800 DALCO SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 555.28 555.28
49786 05/23/00 190100 DEGE'S GARDEN CENTER ANNUAL PACKS 18.11
BLACK OIL SUNFLOWER 6.91 25.02
49787 05/23/00 210276 DON'S PAINT & BODY SHOP REPAIR SQD 909 678.35 678.35
49788 05/23/00 230960 ECOPRINT ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 629.01
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 206.32
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 624.13
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 137.28
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 229.56
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 172.77
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 82.74
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 68.64
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 107.49
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 966.27
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 395.10
2
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3
05/22/00 11:32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 38.85
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 585.37
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 567.79
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 274.56
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 322.47
ANNUAL STATIONERY ORDER 740.87
BUSINESS CARDS - SCHMIDT 45.26
BUSINESS CARDS - BOWMAN 45.26
BUSINESS CARDS - LUKIN 45.26
BUSINESS CARDS - 3 90.52
BUSINESS CARDS - CASAREX 45.26 6,420.78
49789 05/23/00 231600 ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLF LEGAL SERVICES - K BERGLUND 570.45 570.45
49790 05/23/00 240375 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.REPAIR TO M3 382.08
AMB MEDIC 1 175.00
REPAIR TO R3 78.12
REPAIR TO R2 91.42
REPAIR TO M3 132.50 859.12
49791 05/23/00 240380 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH, INC REPAIR SQD 961 372.74
REPAIR SQD 941 238.68 611.42
49792 05/23/00 240710 ENGRAPHICS, INC.NAMEPLATES 26.87 26.87
49793 05/23/00 250500 EXECUTONE SYSTEMS OF ST PAUL PHONE SYSTEM WORK 268.75 268.75
49794 05/23/00 260290 FARMER BROS. CO.COFFEE /FILTERS 57.42 57.42
49795 05/23/00 280960 FREEDOM #65 CAR WASHES 75.00
CAR WASHES 33.00 108.00
49796 05/23/00 300500 G & K SERVICES MATS 42.33
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 96.93
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 77.23
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 69.07
MATS 27.00
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 7.30
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 20.28
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 24.51 364.65
49797 05/23/00 300901 GFOA SGC - GASB COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 150.00 150.00
49798 05/23/00 301255 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA MILEAGE 15.82
PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6.48
BOOKS 30.00
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 3.18
POSTAGE 2.31 57.79
49799 05/23/00 310230 GOODIN COMPANY HAMMER ARRESTOR 18.02 18.02
3
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4
05/22/00 11:32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
49800 05/23/00 310710 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.APRIL 2000 SERVICE 72.00 72.00
49801 05/23/00 320250 GRAF, DAVE APRIL KARATE INSTRUCTION 187.20 187.20
49802 05/23/00 320520 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT STIHL CAP /WRENCH 8.46
LB BLADE 46.30 54.76
49803 05/23/00 350470 HIEBERT, STEVEN K-9 HANDLER 35.00 35.00
49804 05/23/00 350472 HILLTOP TRAILER SALES INC TRAILER RENTAL - MONTHLY 410.03 410.03
49805 05/23/00 350700 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT 13.36
PAINT /BRUSH 27.24
PAINT SUPPLIES 19.76 60.36
49806 05/23/00 380175 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS GRAY PRIMER /XGLENE 35.78 35.78
49807 05/23/00 390104 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #622 BROCHURES 627.59 627.59
49808 05/23/00 390107 INDEPENDENT SPORTS NETWORK SOFTBALL UMPIRING SERVICES 2,730.00 2,730.00
49809 05/23/00 400650 J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC.OLD APPL DISP - CLEAN UP 2000 2,472.00 2,472.00
49810 05/23/00 420150 KINKO'S CUSTOMER ADM SERVICES COPY /CUT KSTP NEIGHBORHOOD NOT 44.46 44.46
49811 05/23/00 430356 KONG, TOMMY 50% REIMB POLICE OFFICER LIC 45.00 45.00
49812 05/23/00 450140 L.T.G. POWER EQUIPMENT TIRE SEALANT SOME 297.14 297.14
49813 05/23/00 450185 LABOR ALL CUSTODIAL SERVICES 463.32 463.32
49814 05/23/00 459550 LAW ENFORCEMENT RESOURCE CTR PROCEDURES MANUAL 295.00 295.00
49815 05/23/00 460452 LEAGUE OF MINN. CITIES LEAGUE OF MN CITIES CONF 590.00
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES CONF 295.00
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES CONF 295.00
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES CONF 295.00 1,475.00
49816 05/23/00 470700 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS BIDS - VEH SALE /NOT - DEARBORN 52.86
BID PROJ 99 -07 /NOTICE -POL AUCT 100.76
NOTICES /FINANCIAL RPT /BID 11189.64
2001 -5 PLAN /BIDS 99-13 & STAT 260.80 1,604.06
49817 05/23/00 500525 M.P.E.L.R.A.SUMMER CONF REGISTRATION - LE 195.00 195.00
49818 05/23/00 510050 MAJESTIC LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS INSTALL BACKFLOW /START UP 146.25 146.25
49819 05/23/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 96.25 96.25
49820 05/23/00 511180 MARKO AUTO SERVICE REPAIR SQD A/C 43.78
REPAIR SQD A/C 88.56
D
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5
05/22/00 11:32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
REPAIR SOD A/C 88.56
REPAIR SQD A/C 215.95 436.85
49821 05/23/00 511600 MASYS CORP JUNE 2000 HARDWARE /SOFTWARE 704.25 704.25
49822 05/23/00 530500 MENARDS STAPLES /SAW BLADES 34.02
ANTI - FATIGUE MAT 159.69
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 51.48 245.19
49823 05/23/00 531400 METRO SALES INC.RICOH COPIER - MAINT AGREEMENT 428.80
RICOH COPIER - MAINT AGREEMENT 107.20 536.00
49824 05/23/00 531650 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER - JUNE 2000 150,220.00 150,220.00
49825 05/23/00 540175 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.MDSE. FOR RESALE 198.50
MDSE. FOR RESALE 167.25
MDSE. FOR RESALE 139.50
MDSE. FOR RESALE 506.65
MDSE. FOR RESALE 15.00 1,026.90
49826 05/23/00 541919 MINNESOTA BOARD OF AELSLAGID PROF ENGINEERING REGISTRATION 104.00 104.00
49827 05/23/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO PHOTOS 19.15
PHOTO DEVELOPING 13.47
2 PHOTOS - DARE 15.31 47.93
49828 05/23/00 542455 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC SHREDDING DOCUMENTS 49.95 49.95
49829 05/23/00 542634 MN VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC LAB AUTOPSY K-9 48.00 48.00
49830 05/23/00 542640 MINNESOTA WANNER CO QUAD KIT /CHAMBER KIT 119.04 119.04
49831 05/23/00 550220 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC.50 PERMITS - CARRY HANDGUNS 15.31 15.31
49832 05/23/00 630010 NADSC NADA OFF USED CAR GUIDE 55.00 55.00
49833 05/23/00 630011 NAPA VALVE STEM /REMOVER 7.11 7.11
49834 05/23/00 660500 NO. ST. PAUL-MAPLEWOOD- OAKDALE 4TH QTR / 99-00 DUES 143.00
MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR CITY MGR 19.50 162.50
49835 05/23/00 660800 NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF MONTHLY UTILITIES 5 -12-00 1
MONTHLY UTILITIES 5 -12-00 218.29
SEWER /LIGHT 1830 &1902 CTY RD B 178.05
SEWER /LIGHT 1830 &1902 CTY RD B 223.87 1,873.31
49836 05/23/00 660900 NORTH STAR TURF, INC.SWIFT & SURE 50#434.52
CYLINDER, STEERING 448.29
TRAINING VIDEO /RUBBER STP 53.28 936.09
49837 05/23/00 661108 NORTH STAR WIPER & INDUSTRIAL TOWELS /TISSUE /LINERS 486.49 486.49
5
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6
05/22/00 11:32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
49838 05/23/00 661185 NORTHERN DOOR CO.COMM GARAGE DOOR/MOSLEY BOXES 157.40 157.40
49839 05/23/00 712260 POOLSIDE PARTS FOR CLORINATOR 27.48
CSP SEAL /SUPPLIES /15HP IMPELL 936.22
REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT 27.48 991.18
49840 05/23/00 722310 PUSH PEDAL PULL CROSSTRAINER 7,050.00 7,050.00
49841 05/23/00 740800 RADIO SHACK AUDLNK /LAPEL MIC 171.18 171.18
49842 05/23/00 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY - PRRREV DATA PROCESSING MARCH 2000 2.08
DATA PROCESSING MARCH 2000 1.66
DATA PROCESSING MARCH 2000 3.04
DATA PROCESSING MARCH 2000 10
DATA PROCESSING MARCH 2000 7.06
DATA PROCESSING MARCH 2000 905.20
TNT NOTICES 2,683.73
1999 MAINT EMERG VEH SYSTEMS 2 6
49843 05/23/00 750500 REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL & LUBE CAR WASHES 19.08
CAR WASHES 6.54
CAR WASHES 74.86
CAR WASHES 20.62
CAR WASHES 7.54 128.64
49844 05/23/00 762724 RYAN, MICHAEL CAR WASH 7.46
TRAINING /MEALS & LODGING 105.55 113.01
49845 05/23/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.SUPPLIES - OFFICE 84.41
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 125.12 209.53
49846 05/23/00 800200 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION REG - TRAFFIC PICTURE CONF 30.00 30.00
49847 05/23/00 820225 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO TIME CARDS 63.41 63.41
49848 05/23/00 820300 PROFESSIONAL MASSAGE CENTER APRIL MASSAGES 2,734.50 2,734.50
49849 05/23/00 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF CRIME LAB SERVICES 105.00
RADIO SRV /MAINT APRIL 2000 528.45
RADIO SRV /MAINT APRIL 2000 220.52
MEDIC SUPPLIES 150.00 1,003.97
49850 05/23/00 840450 ST PAUL NEIGHBORHOOD VIDEO "STREET TO STREAM"25.00 25.00
49851 05/23/00 843570 STREAMLINE DESIGN TEE SHIRTS 15.00
SS TEE SHIRTS 931.00
HENLEY SHIRTS 450.00 1
49852 05/23/00 850670 SUPERIOR PRINTWEAR RESERVE UNIFORM SHIRTS 1,115.75 1,115.75
49853 05/23/00 850674 SUPERIOR SERVICES APRIL RECYCLING 2000 13,618.44 13,618.44
6
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 7
05/22/00 11:32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
49854 05/23/00 851575 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.HP DESKJET /DISKETTES 236.77
HP DESKJET 53.63
HP DESKJET/DISKETTES 100.23
TONER - HP LASERJET 4000 116.37
TONER - HP LASERJET 4000 116837
TONER - HP LASERJET 4000 116.38
TONER - HP LASERJET 119.72
TONER - HP LASERJET 53.52
TONER - HP LASERJET 102.90
TONER - HP LASERJET 173.57
TONER - HP LASERJET 87.41 1,276.87
49855 05/23/00 860650 TARGET STORES-CSA_A /R SUPPLIES - OFFICE 117.95
POP 60.28 178.23
49856 05/23/00 860725 TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.HOURS SUPPORT 162.00 162.00
49857 05/23/00 861659 THE INSTITUTE FOR FORENSIC PSHCH EXAM - KONG 350.00 350.00
49858 05/23/00 861671 THE ROCKIN' HOLLYWOODS DEPOSIT ENTERTAINMENT JULY 4TH 11500.00 1,500.00
49859 05/23/00 862710 TIME WARNER CABLE DMX /RECEIVER 109.79 109.79
49860 05/23/00 881750 TWIN CITY HARDWARE HANDLES /BOLTS /NUTS /WASHERS 102.35 102.35
49861 05/23/00 882830 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVE TOW FOR FORFEITURE VEH 237.60 237.60
49862 05/23/00 890905 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 55.26
TELEPHONE 96.65
TELEPHONE 86.27
TELEPHONE 57.51
TELEPHONE 11591.41
TELEPHONE 419.55
TELEPHONE 115.02
TELEPHONE 138.45
TELEPHONE 298.00
TELEPHONE 86.27
TELEPHONE 86.27
TELEPHONE 86.27 3
49863 05/23/00 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.50
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 237.22 281.72
49864 05/23/00 900173 UNITED HOSPITAL PRE - EMPLOY PHYSICALS 180.00 180.00
49865 05/23/00 901350 URBANSKI, HOLLY REPLENISH PETTY CASH 5.31
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 6.68
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 20.00
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 7.94
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 18.02
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 14.08
7
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 8
05/22/00 11:32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 24.51
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 24.86
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 7.44
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 2.55
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 21.29
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 15.00
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 6.00
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 10.00
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 50
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 9.77
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 3.50
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 6.37
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 15.00
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 15.00
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 9.30
REPLENISH PETTY CASH 8.41
DECREASE PETTY CASH TO $400 100.00-151.53
49866 05/23/00 911350 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY WIRE 169.09
CREDIT 10/5/99 PS S126 3.57 -
CREDIT 9/9/99 PS S262 15.21-150.31
49867 05/23/00 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P.COMM PLUMBING INSP - APRIL2000 1,128.60
COMM PLUMBING INSP - APRIL2000 1,410.75
COMM PLUMBING INSP - APRIL2000 1,410.75 -
COMM PLUMBING INSP 224.00
COMM PLUMBING INSP 280.00
COMM PLUMBING INSP 280.00-11352.60
49868 05/23/00 931314 WALTERS SWIM SUPPLIES REEL /CABLE LOCK /COVER 229.17
REEL /CABLE LOCK /COVER 13.99 215.18
49869 05/23/00 940500 WEBER & TROSETH INC.FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SQUADS 59.75 59.75
49870 05/23/00 941485 WHITE BEAR AVE BUSINESS ASSOC WBABA LUNCHEON - COLEMAN 10.00 10.00
TOTAL CHECKS 403,298.33
pell
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee
05/12/00
05/15/00
05/15/00
05/15/00
05/12/00
05/16/00
05/16/00
05/12/00
05/17/00
05/17/00
05/18/00
05/18/00
05/12/00
05/19/00
05/19/00
05/12/00
05/15/00
05/16/00
05/16/00
05/16/00
05/16/00
05/17/00
05/17/00
05/17/00
05/18/00
05/18/00
05/19/00
05/19/00
05/19/00
05/22/00
05/22/00
05/22/00
U.S. Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
CBSA
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
Elan Financial Services
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN Dept of Revenue
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN Dept of Revenue
TOTAL
Description
Federal Payroll Tax
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
State Payroll Tax
Dental claims
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
Purchasing card items
Drivers, License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
Sales Tax
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
Fuel Tax
Amount
65, 644.90
793.00
15,597.75
12,289.83
4,103.27
952.50
23, 964.75
492.67
733.75
15,112.40
575.25
13,921.67
5,093.00
580.75
16,439.75
253.00
176,543.Z4
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1
05/26/00 08:11 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
49873 05/30/00 DAVID EDWARDS REFUND - VEH TOWED IMPROPERLY 119.23 119.23
49874 05/30/00 ROGER OR CAROLE NEEDELS REFUND - DAMAGE DEPOSIT 226.58 226.58
49875 05/30/00 JEFFREY THEUNE REFUND - MEMBERSHIP 173.06 173.06
49876 05/30/00 CIGNA REFUND - PERZICHILLI 00003470 250.88 250.88
49877 05/30/00 020005 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC.BANNER FOR SAFETY EXPO 186.38 186.38
49878 05/30/00 020870 ALLIED MEDICAL ACCTS CONTROL FEES FOR SERVICE 830.61 830.61
49879 05/30/00 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.PATROL /BOARDING FEES 854.12 854.12
49880 05/30/00 030730 ANOKA HENNEPIN TECH COLLEGE AUTO AIR BAGS COURSE 800.00 800.00
49881 05/30/00 061800 GAYLE BAUMAN PARKING - MGFOA MTG 3.00
MILEAGE - MGFOA MTG 37.24 40.24
49882 05/30/00 071150 BESETH, GORDON MILEAGE - JOB SITE INSPECTIONS 77.00 77.00
49883 05/30/00 080925 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS WATER UTIL - 1980 167.67 167.67
49884 05/30/00 090795 BROCK WHITE COMPANY, LLC.12 ROLL WHITE NET BAG 440.91 440.91
49885 05/30/00 151855 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE AD FOR BIDS - NEW STATION 182.90
BID AD PROJ 99 -13 128.65 311.55
49886 05/30/00 180390 DADCO FOOD PRODUCTS MDSE. FOR RESALE 80.40 80.40
49887 05/30/00 180800 DADCO SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 56.65
TRANSPORTATION CREDIT 10.00-46.65
49888 05/30/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 1,131.00 1,131.00
49889 05/30/00 200900 DITCH WITCH OF MN INC 19219 SEAL KIT POST PULLER 55.75 55.75
49890 05/30/00 230845 EARTHWATER STENCILS STORM DRAIN STENCILS 87.44
STORM DRAIN STENCILS 4.12-83.32
49891 05/30/00 230960 ECOPRINT 6 SETS BUSINESS CARDS 271.56
BUSINESS CARDS /LUKIN 45.26 316.82
49892 05/30/00 235000 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS EYEBOLT TIE 202.88 202.88
49893 05/30/00 260290 FARMER BROS. CO.MDSE. FOR RESALE 150.70 150.70
49894 05/30/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 56.74
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 9.93
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 59.94
10
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2
05/26/00 08:11 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER /
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 150.45
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 83.71
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 24.51 390.47
49895 05/30/00 300550 GE CAPITAL MAY 2000 KODAK COPIER LEASE 35.29
MAY 2000 KODAK COPIER LEASE 35.29
MAY 2000 KODAK COPIER LEASE 1.26
MAY 2000 KODAK COPIER LEASE 45.59
MAY 2000 KODAK COPIER LEASE 94.99
MAY 2000 KODAK COPIER LEASE 84.23
MAY 2000 KODAK COPIER LEASE 20.13
MAY 2000 KODAK COPIER LEASE 38.83
MAY 2000 KODAK COPIER LEASE 94.42
MAY 2000 KODAK COPIER LEASE 78.29 528.32
49896 05/30/00 301695 GERMAIN, DAVE SHOES 29.99 29.99
49897 05/30/00 302500 GILLUND ENTERPRISES CHAIN LUBE 61.22 61.22
49898 05/30/00 310680 GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING SOCKETS /HPL575X /1000W /TAPE 325.41 325.41
49899 05/30/00 320265 GRAFIX SHOPPE STRIPE RESERVE VAN 400.48 400.48
49900 05/30/00 320520 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT ECHO TRIMMER 212.99 212.99
49901 05/30/00 330407 HAYMAN, JANET GREW PROGRAM SUPPLIES 83.36
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 5.94
MILEAGE 8.26 97.56
49902 05/30/00 340110 HEJNY RENTALS, INC SOD CUTTER 69.39 69.39
49903 05/30/00 350895 HOLIDAY FLEET CAR WASHES 6.36 6.36
49904 05/30/00 351610 HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY METER STATION FOR MCES 99 -02 3 3,487.50
49905 05/30/00 390104 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #622 RENTAL SPACE 15.00 15.00
49906 05/30/00 440800 KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC.REPAIR RADAR UNIT 68.85 68.85
49907 05/30/00 450140 L.T.G. POWER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SENSORS 201.16 201.16
49908 05/30/00 459549 LAW ENFORCEMENT RESOURCES INC PROCEDURES MANUAL 295.00 295.00
49909 05/30/00 460800 LESCO, INC.ROUNDUP 104.64 104.64
49910 05/30/00 500800 M.T.I. DISTRIBUTING CO.BODY PKG /DRIVE ASSY /STATOR 232.45
DRIVE ASSY 81.34 313.79
49911 05/30/00 501565 MAGNATAG VISIBLE SYSTEMS DIE -CUT NUMBERS 91.59
DIE-CUT NUMBERS 5.59-86.00
11
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3
05/26/00 08:11 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
49912 05/30/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY MDSE. FOR RESALE 821.92 821.92
49913 05/30/00 511200 MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE CO.BACKUP CLEANING SRV 96.30 96.30
49914 05/30/00 530500 MENARDS MAILBOX 4.96
PAINT BUCKETS /GRASS SEED /BRUSH 36.08
ANTI-FATIGUE MAT 266.14 307.18
49915 05/30/00 530730 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY RETURNED 2 SOCCER NETS 159.75 -
EQUIP BAGS /BALLS 207.78
EQUIP BAGS /BALLS 207.78
EQUIP BAGS /BALLS 89.10
EQUIP BAGS /BALLS 138.18
EQUIP BAGS /BALLS 274.98 758.07
49916 05/30/00 531670 M.E.M.A. - METRO EMERG MGRS AS MEMA ANNUAL PROGRAM & LUNCHEON 34.00 34.00
49917 05/30/00 531920 MICHAEL'S STORES INC.POSTER BOARD /BOX FRAME 15.58 15.58
49918 05/30/00 540175 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.MDSE. FOR RESALE 290.75
MDSE. FOR RESALE 131.70 422.45
49919 05/30/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO FILM DEVELOPING 35.04
FILM DEVELOPING 49.63
PHOTOS 7.66
DEVELOP FILM 30.85
DEVELOP FILM 4.99
DEVELOP FILM 5.74 133.91
49920 05/30/00 542455 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 69.93 69.93
49921 05/30/00 551500 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY NPDES STORM WTR PRMT 99 -07 240.00 240.00
49922 05/30/00 570090 MOGREN BROS.DIRT /SOD 117.15
BLACK DIRT 63.90
SOD 17.04
BLACK DIRT 63.90 261.99
49923 05/30/00 640815 NEWPROS DATA, INC.LISTLABS 42.95 42.95
49924 05/30/00 660110 NORTH CENTRAL AMBULANCE HEAD END STORAGE POUCH 94.51 94.51
49925 05/30/00 680505 OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER CONCRETE 348.26 348.26
49926 05/30/00 691160 ON SITE SANITATION WAKEFIELD PARK - 4/17 TO 5/12 108.93
GETHSEMENE PARK - 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
SHERWOOD PK - 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
HARVEST PARK - 4/17 TO 5/12 108.93
HAZELWOOD PK - 4/17 TO 5/12 108.93
PLAYCREST PK - 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
MAPLEWOOD HTS PK- 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4
05/26/00 08:11 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
JOY PARK 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
GERANIUM PK - 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
AFTON HTS PK - 4/17 TO 5/12 79.46
KOHLMAN PK - 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
FLICEK PK - 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
EDGERTON PK - 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
GLADSTONE SCH 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
PLEASANTVIEW PK - 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
WESTERN HILLS PK- 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
ST JEROME SCH - 4/17 TO 5/12 54.46
JOHN GLENN SCH - 5/2 TO 5/12 23.05 1,137.28
49927
i
05/30/00 691800 OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS COUPLING & ATTACHMENT 75.75 75.75
49928 05/30/00 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY - PRRREV FLOWERS 736.60 736.60
49929 05/30/00 750550 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS MDSE. FOR RESALE 387.93
MDSE. FOR RESALE 221.62
MDSE. FOR RESALE 124.43
MDSE. FOR RESALE 147.06 881.04
49930 05/30/00 761310 ROBERTS, KEN SPRING 2000 EDUCATION 1 1,005.22
49931 05/30/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.SUPPLIES - OFFICE 32.03
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 32.03
FRAMES 30.30
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 109.19
RETURNED - OFFICE SUPPLIES 174.03-29.52
49932 05/30/00 820205 SIERRA DIGITAL, INC.PROGRAMMING -ACT REG ENROLL SCR 760.00 760.00
49933 05/30/00 830830 SOUTHVIEW GARDEN CENTER INC MAPLE TREE 200.08 200.08
49934 05/30/00 831400 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC.WINDSHIRTS 120.30
WINDSHIRTS 62.30
WINDSHIRTS 62.30
SUPPLIES FOR ALCOHOL PROGRAM 636.34 881.24
49935 05/30/00 831659 SQUIRE HOUSE GARDENS TROWELS 102.24
PUPPET 14.91 117.15
49936 05/30/00 840000 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY ADV DRIVING TECH COURSE (11)2,208.00 2,208.00
49937 05/30/00 843655 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC MAINT CONT - LANIER5112 369.92 369.92
49938 05/30/00 860080 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC BITUMINOUS MATERIALS 2,279.19
AC FINE ASPHALT 59.48 2
49939 05/30/00 860305 T.J.T. - SHIRTS BIRTHDAY SHIRTS 495.00 495.00
49940 05/30/00 860320 T.R.F. SUPPLY CO.DUST MASK /TOWELS /GREASE 420.67
13
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5
05/26/00 08:11 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
POP UP TOWELS 153636 574.03
49941 05/30/00 860410 TSE, INC.JANITORIAL SRVS 3/23 TO 4/19 669.00 669.00
49942 05/30/00 861611 THE CREATIVE GROUP PUBLISHING 2,976.00 2,976.00
49943 05/30/00 871175 TOM'S MOBIL SERVICE SET -UP NEW JET SKIS 70.24 70.24
49944 05/30/00 880501 TREADWAY GRAPHICS T- SHIRTS DARE 235.85
BALLOONS /WINDSHIRT /PEN /WATCH 429.22 665.07
49945 05/30/00 880750 TROY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES HD FLOOR FINISH 173.00
GLOVES /MPS /BASKETS 488.92
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 657.45-4.47
49946 05/30/00 880820 TRUGREEN-MAPLEWOOD #4635 WEED CONTROL /MANTON SCHOOL 195.96 195.96
49947 05/30/00 882830 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVE TOW FORFEITURE VEH 146.18
TOW SQD 37.28 183.46
49948 05/30/00 890910 US WEST DEX MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY CTR 103.40 103.40
49949 05/30/00 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 91.91
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 60.30
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 12.41
NAVY SHIRT 60.30
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 78.21
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 591.91
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 91.91 986.95
49950 05/30/00 910450 VALLEY TROPHY DARE- PLAQUES /PLEXI /PLATES /LTR 142.16 142.16
49951 05/30/00 934170 THE WATSON CO INC MDSE. FOR RESALE 133.17 133.17
49952 05/30/00 941500 WHITE BEAR LAKE RESERVE UNIT TRAINING - POLICE RESERVES 225.00 225.00
TOTAL CHECKS 35,051.31
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee Description Amount
05/22/00 05/23/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 818.25
05/22/00 05/23/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 20,049.48
05/19/00 05/23/00 CBSA Dental claims 1
05/23/00 05/24/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 784.75
05/23/00 05/24/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 14,701.55
05/19/00 05/24/00 Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items 2
05/24/00 05/24/00 Norwest Investment purchase 998,588.89
05/24/00 05/25/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 650.00
05/24/00 05/25/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149pYg 15 625.95
05/25/00 05/26/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 762.50
05/25/00 05/26/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 15,085.19
05/26/00 05/30/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 523.00
05/26/00 05/30/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149Yg 20 839.93
05/26/00 05/30/00 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 65,958.01
05/26/00 05/30/00 CBSA Dental claims 1,788.08
TOTAL 11159,855.62
15
VOUCHRE2
06/01/00 16:15
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
8308 05/30/00 380470 I.P.M.A.
8309 05/30/00 630018 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
8310 05/31/00 722200 P.E.R.A.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
ITEM ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
LUNCHEON MEETING 17.00 17.00
PERA LIFE INS P/R DED MAY 201.00
PERA LIFE INS MCGUIRE, MIKE 12.00 213.00
P/R DEDUCTION REMIT 5/26/OOP/R 14,791.75
P/R DEDUCTION REMIT 5/26/OOP/R 18,706.47 33,498.22
TOTAL CHECKS 33,728.22
16
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1
06/02/00 07:51 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
8311 06/01/00 330680 HEALTHPARTNERS MNTHLY PREMIUM DUE`- JUNE 2000 5,919.05
MNTHLY PREMIUM DUE - JUNE 2000 21,671.10
MNTHLY PREMIUM DUE - JUNE 2000 3,807.59 31,397.74
8312 06/01/00 530100 MEDICA CHOICE MNTHLY PREMIUM DUE - JUNE 2000 490.92
MNTHLY PREMIUM DUE - JUNE 2000 24,924.53
MNTHLY PREMIUM DUE - JUNE 2000 3,483.70 33,299.15
8313 06/01/00 551100 MN MUTUAL LIFE-INSURANCE MNTHLY PREMIUM DUE - JUNE 2000 346.18
MNTHLY PREMIUM DUE - JUNE 2000 1,182.56
MNTHLY PREMIUM DUE - JUNE 2000 966.60
MNTHLY PREMIUM DUE - JUNE 2000 64.26 2,559.60
8314 06/01/00 110870 CBSA MNTHLY ADMIN FEE - JUNE 2000 516.80 516.80
8315 06/01/00 280200 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO.MNTHLY PREMIUM DUE - JUNE 2000 2,033.07 2,033.07
49955,06/06/00 U -CARE MINNESOTA REFUND AS MEDICARE IS PRIMARY 694.89 694.89
49956 06/06/00 CHARLES SCHAAF REFUND - GRADING 867 CENTURY S 1
REFUND - GRADING 867 CENTURY S 35.21 1,035.21
49957 06 /06 /00 ROGER PACKER 18 VOLLEYBALL GAMES REFEREE 333.00 333.00
49958 06/06/00 PATTY SAGERT 3 VOLLEYBALL REFEREE 55.50 55.50
49959 06/06/00 MARK WEBER 14 VOLLEYBALL - REFEREE 259.00 259.00
49960 06 /06 /00 COLM GRIFFIN 6 VOLLEYBALL - REFEREE 111.00 111.00
49961 06/06/00 DAN BOWMAN 42 ASSIGNED OFFICIALS 63.00 63.00
49962 06/06/00 PROGRESSIVE BAPTIST CHURCH REFUND - GROUP REGISTRATRAION 64.80 64.80
49963 06/06/00 CIGNA REFUND - 00003470 L PERZICHILL 157.32 157.32
49964 06/06/00 010463 A T & T LONG DIST BILL 160.69
A/R PERSONAL LONG DIST 3.12
LONG DIST AT &T GIFT CERT 5.00-158.81
49965 06/06/00 010467 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES CELL PHONES 326.07 326.07
49966 06/06/00 010685 AD SHARE INC FITNESS CTR OPENING -POSTCARDS 1,644.58 1
49967 06/06/00 020411 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEVUE CELL PHONES 53.23
CELL PHONE 6.74
SQD CELL PHONES 355.87
CELL PHONES 20.69
CELL CHARGES - PWC 30.78
CELL CHARGES - STREET 30.78
CELL CHARGES - UTIL 30.78
17
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2
06/02/00 07;51 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
CELL PHONES 334.14
CELL PHONE 18.33 881.34
49968 06/06/00 030310 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.REPLACE RADIO'S FROM AMB FIRE 7 7,084.06
49969 06/06/00 110470 CARLE, JEANETTE MILEAGE CHANGE FOR M.V.16.80 16.80
49970 06/06/00 120525 CENTURY COLLEGE REG:EMT EXAM - M ACOSTA 50.00
REG - EMT EXAM B NEUMAN 50.00
REG - EMT EXAM (7)350.00 450.00
49971 06/06/00 151890 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP.TJ 2001 133.77 133.77
49972 06/06/00 161350 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT SANDBLAST AND PAINT EXT TRUCK 1 1,863.75
49973 06/06/00 181800 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO.4' SEWER SADDLES ROMAC 131.19 131.19
49974 06/06/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 625.00 625.00
49975 06/06/00 230900 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO.APRIL 2000 - COPIER BILLING 30.06
APRIL 2000 - COPIER BILLING 30.06
APRIL 2000 - COPIER BILLING 99
APRIL 2000 - COPIER BILLING 38.83
APRIL 2000 - COPIER BILLING 80.90
APRIL 2000 - COPIER BILLING 71.97
APRIL 2000 - COPIER BILLING 17.14
APRIL 2000 - COPIER BILLING 33.07
APRIL 2000 - COPIER BILLING 80.41
APRIL 2000 - COPIER BILLING 66.57 450.00
49976 06/06/00 230960 ECOPRINT BUSINESS CARDS /LUKIN 45.26 45.26
49977 06/06/00 240380 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH,INC REPAIR SQUAD 967 415.68 415.68
49978 06/06/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 47.07
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 44.96
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 9.93
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 47.73
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 82.73
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 78.33
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 40.79
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 25.58 515.51
49979 06/06/00 320475 GROOVE -TECH INC.APPLY RECESSED CROSSWALK /TAPE 1,350.00 1,350.00
49980 06/06/00 330398 HASKELL SENATOR, INC.OFFICE FURNITURE - LTS. .7,416.83 7,416.83
18
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3
06/02/00 07:51 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
49981 06/06/00 330679 HEALTHEAST ER VISIT - J GROSCHER 182.17 182.17
49982 06/06/00 340601 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE TUITION-PIERCE,SIEDOW,TESSMER 1,994.60 1,994.60
49983 06/06/00 350700 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT BRUSHES 46.16 46.16
49984 06/06/00 380175 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS FIELD MARKING PAINT 873.30 873.30
49985 06/06/00 390360 INSTY- PRINTS 750 COLOR COPIES 850.38 850.38
49986 06/06/00 400788 JAMES STEELE CONSTRUCTION MCC ADDITION - PYMT 4 98007.01 79,739.00
MCC ADDITION - PYMT 4 98007.01 3,987.00-75,752.00
49987.06/06/00 401250 JIM HATCH SALES CO.SHOVELS /RAKES /BROOMS 574.74 574.74
49988 06/06/00 401670 JOLLY TYME FAVORS RULERS /KAZOOS 120.38 120.38
49989 06/06/00 410370 KATH COMPANIES 7000 GAL DIESEL 6,512.45
7000 GAL UNLEADED 8 15,383.90
49990 06/06/00 420050 KIDSDANCE DJ FEE 250.00 250.00
49991 06/06/00 430350 KNOX LUMBER CO 6" GAS VENT TOP 26.84 26.84
49992 06/06/00 440110 KRINKIE HTG & AIR CONDITIONING A/C CHECK STATION 1 151.00 151.00
49993 06/06/00 450102 L.E. RIBAR COMPANY INC.REPLACEMENT SENSORS 201.16 201.16
49994 06/06/00 450470 LANDE, DAVE SCHEDULING YOUTH - BASKETBALL 368.68 368.68
49995 06/06/00 500800 M.T.I. DISTRIBUTING CO.TORO 325-D GROUNDSMASTER 4WD 26
TRADE TORO 325 -D 4 22,347.96
49996 06/06/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 61.00 61.00
49997 06/06/00 511180 MARKO AUTO SERVICE REPAIR A/C 945 330.59 330.59
49998 06 /06 /00 520450 MCCOLLISTER & CO.MN DIESEL 15W40 646.35
MN DIESEL 15W40 646.35 1,292.70
49999 06/06/00 520500 MCGUIRE, MICHAEL VEHICLE ALLOWANCE - JUNE 450.00 450.00
50000 06/06/00 530097 MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB, INC.REPLACE CABLE 85.00 85.00
50001 06/06/00 530501 MENARDS MAKITA 14.4V DRIVERDRILL /TAPE 189.34 189.34
50002 06/06/00 530755 METROCALL DIGITAL PAGER 10.46 10.46
50003 06/06/00 540480 MIKE'S LP GAS & R.V. SERVICE SCREEN /INSTALL AWNING 143.26 143.26
50004 06/06/00 610400 MUNICILITE CO.DIRECTIO 92.44 92.44
19
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4
06/02/00 07:51 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
50005 06 /06 /00 630012 NATW MATERIALS FOR NAIL NIGHT OUT 988.47 988.47
50006 06/06/00 690340 OLSON, ARNOLD G MILEAGE - BLDG INSPECTIONS 66.92 66.92
50007 06/06/00 701300 PARR EMERGENCY PRODUCTS SALES HIP STYLE RESPONDERS 20 537.37 537.37
50008 06/06/00 712100 PITNEY BOWES INC.POSTAGE METER RENTAL & RESET 1,242.00
POSTAGE METER RENTAL & RESET 28.50 1,270.50
50009 06/06/00 =720760 PRECISION BUS INESS:SYSTEMS REPAIR FAX MACHINE 291.22 291.22
50010 06/06/00 721175 PROEX PHOTO SLIDE DUPLICATES 9.53 9.53
50011 06/06/00 740690 RAAEN, BARB FILM PROCESSING /FILM 18.59
FILM PROCESSING 18.48
FILM PROCESSING /FILM 2.27-34.80
50012 06/06/00 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY-PRRREV POSTAL VERIFICATION CARDS 89.52 89.52
50013 06/06/00 761200 ROAD RESCUE, INC.AMBULANCE - LENS /BULB /HOOK /LAMP 287.28 287.28
50014 06/06/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.SUPPLIES - OFFICE 11.86
TABLE BASE 146.97
TABLE BASE 83.07 -
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 77.28
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 44.84
DESK TOP AUDIO SYSTEM 212.95 410.83
50015 06/06/00 780350 S.E.H.ENGR - PROJECT 98 -09 186.04 186.04
50016 06/06/00 780600 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT PLASTIC BAG 27.67
MDSE. FOR RESALE 345.06
MDSE. FOR RESALE 380.35
CANDY - PROGRAM SUPPLIES 248.26
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 93.51
SNACKS /CANDY BARS 109.22
CANDY - PROGRAM SUPPLIES 199.92
SNACKS - PROGRAM SUPPLIES 146.08
DIR PRIMARY RENEWAL /MEMBERSHIP 30.00
MEMBER-SWENDSEN, JOANNE 15.00
MEMBER-HUTCHINSON, ANN 15.00
MEMBER-CALLAHAN, COLLEEN 15.00
MEMBER-SWANSON, LYLE 7.50
MEMBER-SWANSON, LYLE 7.50
MEMBER-SAVAGEAU, STEPHEN 7.50
MEMBER-SAVAGEAU, STEPHEN 7.50
MEMBER -JAHN, DAVE 7.50
MEMBER-JAHN, DAVE 7.50
MEMBER-0 SCHROEDER, KATH 15.00
MEMBER-LIDBERG, MICHAEL 15.00
MEMBER- DUELLMAN, JOSEPH 15.00
VOUCHRE2
06/02/00 07:51
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
50017 06/06/00 800090 SEELBACH-HILTON HOTEL
50018 06/06/00 820210 SIELOFF,"BEVERLY-
50019 06/06/00 820560 SMOKE EATER
50020 06/06/00 820600 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL
50021 06 /06 /00 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF
50022 06/06/00 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA A/R
CITY OF'MAPLEWOOD
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
50023 06/06/00 861150 TECH PARTNERS ST PAUL INC
50024 06/06/00 861618 THE ENGRAVING SHOP
50025 06/06100 871400 TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT
50026 06/06/00 881700 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO.
50027 06/06/00 882000 TWIN CITY SAW & SERVICE CO
50028 06/06/00 890900 U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS
50029 06/06/00 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
50030 06/06/00 911600 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
50031 06/06/00 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P.
50032 06/06/00 931850 WARNING LITES OF MN
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MEMBER-SCHMIDT, RUSSELL
MEMBER-GRAF, MICHAEL
MEMBER-GERARD, JAMES
MEMBER-ROBBINS, AUDRA
MEMBER-KARAS, TAMMY
MEMBER-ICKES, SHERI
CONF #3110102381 - 4 NIGHTS
WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
84 SMOKE EATER SUBSCRIPTIONS
BATTERIES /BOXES /ADAPTOR
CRIME LAB SERVICES MAR /APR
CRIME LAB SERVICES MAR /APR
GLUCO STRIP
FRAMES /COVERS /CRAYONS
CONTAINERS /RQCUETS
PADS /BAGS /SCRUBERS /SHARPENER
TAPE /BOOKS
REPAIR SERVICE FOR CANON FAX
70 TROPHIES - FLOOR HOCKEY
50 TROPHIES - FLOOR HOCKEY
DJ FOR DANCE
REPAIR GARAGE DOOR
WEED TRIMMER
CHAIN SAW CHAIN /OIL/LINE /POLY
COIN -OP TELEPHONES
COIN-OP TELEPHONES
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
GLOVES /SAFETY GLASS /BANDANA /LT
COMM PLMBG
COMM PLMBG
COMM PLMBG
WINDBREAKERS
WINDBREAKERS
PAGE 5
ITEM CHECK
AMOUNT AMOUNT
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00 1,805.07
503.37 503.37
101.18 101.18
327.00 327.00
59.05 59.05
50.00
60.00 110.00
69.99
35.99
74.49
46.90
19.72 247.09
49.50 49.50
210.00
150.00 360.00
300.00 300.00
80.00 80.00
212.99
262.76 475.75
432.38
63.31 495.69
26.95
118.65 145.60
143.83 143.83
155.00
193.75
193.75-155.00
220.93
178.45 399.38
21
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6
06/02/00 07:51 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
50033 06/06/00 934132 WATER;JOE
50034''06/06/00
82.22
940552 WELCOME MOTORS
50035 06/06/00 940583 WESTLING, TOM
50036 06/06/00 960500 XPEDX
ITEM ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
FOOD FOR STATION MEETING 42.75 42.75
REPAIR K -9 SQUAD 500.00 500.00
HEAD INSTRUCTOR - TENNIS 742.50 742.50
11X17 WHITE PAPER 82.22 82.22
229,164.25TOTALCHECKS
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checkin g account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pa ee Description
05/30/00 05/31/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697
05/30/00 05/31/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrarpyg #149
05/26/00 05/31/00 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax05/26/00 05/31/00 CBSA Dental claims
05/26/00 05/31/00 Elan Financial Services Purchasin g card items
05/31/00 06/01/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697
05/31/00 06/01 /00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149pY906/01/00 06/01/00 Solomon Smith BarneyY nvestment purchasep
06/01/00 06/02/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697
06/01/00 06/02/00 MN State::Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149pYg06/01/00 06/02/00 Firstar Bank Debt Service
05/31/00 06/02/00 WI Dept of Revenue WI State Payroll Tax06/02/00 06/05/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697
06/02/00 06/05/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149pY9
TOTAL
Amount
957.00
20,964.52
12,426.75
1
2
768.75
24, 286.63
494, 399.86
653.00
24
54, 602.50
1,013.70
526.00
23,167.85
ozo Itsts.zy
23
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS,.REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
1
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 ALLENSPACH , SHERRY 3 3 9.2 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 ALDRI DGE , MARK 2 4 5 2.7 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 BOHL , JOHN C 2272912
DIRECT DEPOSIT
3 05/26/00 FLOR,TIMOTHY 2029.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 FRASER,JOHN 2059.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J 2121.8 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 PALMA,STEVEN 2252.64
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 JOHNSON , KEVIN 219 0.8 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 HELLE., KERRY 2536.44
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 ANDREWS ,SCOTT A 2 0 8 2.6 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 HASSENSTAB,DENISE R 19080
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 HI EBERT , STEVEN 2 4 61.2 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 DUNN ,ALICE 2321947
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 CORNER AMY L 13 5.8 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 MOREHEAD,JESSICA R 88.20
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 BELDE,STANLEY 2185989
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 BAKKE,LONN A 1894943
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05 BOWMAN, RICK A 2 02 6.4 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 KOPPEN , MARVIN 339927
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 PIKE , GARY K 1912.31
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 HEINZ STEPHEN J 217 5.4 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 HERBERT,MICHAEL J 2221.67
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 STOCKTON,DERRELL T 2026.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 ROSSMAN,DAVID A 2.047.87
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 HALWEG , KEVIN R 2 8 4 9.6 7
24
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD.
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 JUNG , STEPHANIE J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 MARUSKA ,ERICA
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 OLSON JULIE S
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 BREHEIM,ROGER W
DIRECT DEPOSIT
li 05/26/00 LARSON,DANIEL J.
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 THIENES,PAUL
DIRECT DEPOSIT.
05/26/00 CAL ,COLLEEN J
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 CARLSON,THERESE
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 LE,SHERYL
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 FAUST ,DANIEL F
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 BAUMAN , GAYLE L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 KELSEY , CONNI E L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 GUI LFO I LE , KAREN E
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 POWELL , PHILIP
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 WINGER DONALD S
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 BANICK,JOHN J
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 h;ARIS,FLINT D
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 KVAM, DAVID
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 RABBETT , KEVIN
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 STEFFEN , SCOTT L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 THOMALLA, DAVID J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 BERGERON JOSEPH A
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 GERVAIS— JR,CLARENCE N
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 LUKIN,STEVEN J
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 HAIDER I KENNETH G
AMOUNT
1613.38
259.50
1337.63
1588.02
1459.36
2661.08
1745.23
1754.30
3141.92
3403.12
2305.89
791.36
2004o79
1698.26
3322.37
2614.55
2597.24
2727.47
239
2424.64
2614.55
2646.43
1980.89
2579.94
4153.12
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT -05/26/00 PRI EFER, WILLIAM 1875923
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 KANE ,MICHAEL R 213 5.2 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 LUNDSTEN,LANCE 2374.77
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M 2465.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 ANDERSON,.BRUCE 3059051
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 MARUSKA , MARK A 2135923
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 HUTCHINSON,ANN E 1780.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 COLEMAN , MELINDA 3 015.5 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 GRAF ,MICHAEL 1211.2 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 ROBBINS , AUDRA L 1272983
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 ATKINS , KATHERINE 114 9.6 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 CROSSON LINDA 1628903
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 EASTMAN THOMAS E 2130986
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 STAPLES,PAULINE 2400.31
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 SCHLINGMAN,PAUL 1826.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 HURLEY, STEPHEN 2247905
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 2301.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 WENZEL,JAY B 1337.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 DOBLAR , RI CHARD N 12 4 4.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 COLLINS , KENNETH V 339927.
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 C BEL CRAIGAMPL, D 13 7 3.6 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 WHITE,BARRY T 231.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J 243.93
DIRECT DEPOSIT-.
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 ERI CKSON , KYLE F 5 8 0.3 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 WEAVER, KRISTINE A 841.14
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 HAWKINS ,LISA A
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 KOEHNEN AMY
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 McGUIRE,MICHAEL A
DIRECT DEPOSIT
f 05/26/00 TRONNES,JOHN E
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 OSTER,ANDREA J
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 URBANSKI HOLLY S
DIRECT DEPOSIT t
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 ANDERSON,CAROLE J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 JACKSON , MARY L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 TET ZLAFF , JUDY A
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 CASARE Z, GINA
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 I CKES , SHERI
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 CARLE JEANETTE E
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 JAGOE,CAROL
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 OLSON SANDRA
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 CORCORAN,THERESA M
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 MARTINSON ,CAROL F
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 EVERSON,PAUL
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 PARSONS , KURT G
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 SPANGLER, EDNA E
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 ZWI EG SUSAN C.
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 DeBILZAN,THOMAS C
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 EDGE,DOUGLAS
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 LUTZ,DAVID P
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 MEYER, GERALD W
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 NAGEL , BRYAN
AMOUNT
79.40
91.25
4180.37
1244.83
1508.03,
1263.02
1031.54
1485.63
1340.83
1368.83
1304.33
1407.94
1407.94
895.52
1343.14
1509.64
2074.36
1345.65
492.34
1480.03
1199.23
1616.00
1561.63
1662.43
1563.64
27
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT .05/26/00 OSWALD , ERICK D 1576063
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 THOMAS —JR, STEVEN 15 3 2.0 3
n
DIRECT DEPOSIT 005/26/ 0 UC E JOHDHARM , N 17 7 6.0 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 PECK,DENNIS L 1877.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 PRIEBE,WILLIAM 2174.78
DIRECT DEPOSIT
x 05/26/00 DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M 782.81
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1561963
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 GREW— HAYMAN , JANET M 8 4 6.0 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 HORSNELL ,JUDITH A 1114.6 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 NELSON , JEAN 9 2 3.0 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 GAYNOR,VIRGINIA A 1582.54
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 FRY PATRI CIA 14 4 6.4 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 LIVINGSTON JOYCE L 8 3 7.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 THOMPSON,DEBRA J 480.65
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 EKSTRAND,THOMAS G 1890.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 ROBERTS,KENNETH 2017.84
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1856003
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 KELLY ,LISA 1101000
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 NORDQUI ST , RI CHARD 15 4 4.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 OTI S MARY ELLEN M 6 9 0.7 4
1t,
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 CHRI STENS EN JODI E D 4 6 7.7 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 COLEMAN,PHILIP 319.13
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 FARR,DIANE M 283.64
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 HORWATH,RONALD J 413.61
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 JOHNSON , MEGAN M 2 6 8.3 6
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 LARSON, DEBRA.
DiC'I' .DEPOSIT 05/26/00 MOORE , VANES SA J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 SAVAGEAU STEPHEN D
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/26/00 SEEGER,GERALD F
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT i
05/26/00 STEINHORST,JEFFREY
x 05/26/00 SWANSON,LYLE
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT Y{05/26/00 COSTELLO,SHARON L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/26/00 BRANDSTROM,RYAN M.
78554 05/26/00 CARDINAL,ROBERT J.
78 - 555 05/26/00 WASILUK,JULIE A
78556 05/26/00 ZICK,LINDA
78557 05/26/00 INGVOLDSTAD,CURTIS J
78558 05/26/00 CUDE,LARRY J
78559 05/26/00 EDSON,KAREN L
78560 05/26/00 SHELLEDY,DAWN M
78561 05/26/00 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE
78562 05/26/00 JOHNSON,BONNIE
78563 05/26/00 VIETOR,LORRAINE S
78564 05/26/00 PALANK,MARY KAY
78565 05/26/00 RICHIE,CAROLE L
78566 05/26/00 RYAN,MICHAEL
78567 05/26/00 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M
78568 05/26/00 BARTZ,PAUL
78569 05/26/00 BUSACK;DANIEL P
78570 05/26/00 ERICKSON,VIRGINIA A
AMOUNT
240.61
590.93
1393.63
396.81
467.71
1523.59
205.28
98.00
385.50
339.27
563.50
40.00
391.71
940.00
755.71
1630.70
883.63
1582.74
1751.18
1751.18
2935.09
1704.42
2464.13
1337.63
2360.51
CHEC NUMBER
78571
7
78573
78575
78576
78577
78578
78579
78
78581
7
78583
78584
78585
785-86
785,87
78588
7-8589
CHECK DATE
0:5/26/00
05/26/00
05/26/00
05/26/00
05/26/00
05/26/00
0511/2,6/00
05/26/00
05/26/00
05/26/00
05/26/00
05/26/0,0
05.126/00
05/2-6/00
05/26/00
05/2.6/00
0-5/26/00
05./26/00
05/26/0,0
7859.0 05/26/00
78591 05/26/00
785:92 05/26/G0
78593 05/26/00
78594 05/26/00
78:595 05/26/00
EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
KONG.,TO,MMY T 922*43
SHOR-TREED,MICHAEL P 2128.88
WATCZAK,LAURA 1936*83
WELCHLIN , CABOT V 2.015.18
HALE,THOMAS M 843*77
MEEHAN , JAMES 2,119*23
MORNING, TIMOTHY L 1,305.,s33
SVENDSEN,RUSTIN L 2- 060.00
CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1564 03
NIVEN,AMY S 21*20
FREBERG,RONALD L 1590943
JONES R 1352*03
ELIAS,JAMES G 1877*63
LINDBLOM,RANDAL
EDSON,DAVID B 1590.43
HELEY,ROLAND B 1590*43
HINNENKAMP . GARY 15-42083
LAVAQUE 1532o03
LINDORFV P 1561.63
LUND,ERIC 256o0 -0
RODRIGUEZ,RAUL J 647*150
KUDA,.KRISTEN L 3240-0.0
SOUTTER 119.44
WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1508o03
SCH.MIDT,JASON E 1470.83
30
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
w
CHECK DATE
now wo "m
EMPLOYEE NAME
go& am mw am
TAMOUN
78596
mm mw
ANDERSON,EVER
am =m 40=
403. 4` 0
785 0-5/26/00 BESETH,GORDON R 740. 00
7859-8 05/26/00 OSTROM-,MARJORIE 2213063
7:8599 05/26/00 WENGER,ROBERT J 1844*03
78-600 0-5/26/00 BRAND STROM,,MARY C 6-5o81
7861101 0,5/26/00 FINN S 13660.83
78,602 05./26/00 FLUG R 144.
7:86-03 05/26/010 FLUG,,MEGAN L 67950
78604 05/-26/00 FRANK 164000
78605 0-5/26/00 FRA.NK,STEVE 247o50
78606 0*5/26/00 G-EBHARD I JILL IAN R.123 0
78:607 0;5/26/00 NORGAARD J 48000
7 8, 08 0 5/ 2,6 / GO SHOBERG A 98.00
78609 05/26/00 TVEDTEN,ERIK A 44
78610 05/26/00 GERMAIN,,DAVID 1573.63
786-11 05/26/00 NADEAU,EDWARD A 993.97
786-12 05/26./00 SCHULTZ M 1458.47
78613 05/26/00 COON$18*73
78614 05/26/00 DISKERUD,HEATHER A 35*50
78-.6,15 0,5/26/0,0 GLASS,JEAN 849.6..2
78616 05/26/00 H-,OIUM,SHEILA 947*18
78617 05/26/0,0 K-AR-AS TAMARA A 02 99
78-618 05/26/00 OGREN ALLI SON A 181.05
78619 05/26/00 POWERS L 188*7.0
78620 05/26/00 RIDLEHOOVER KATE 1 67*45
31
32
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78621 05/26/00 SALZBRENNER,HEIDI T 60.35
78622 05/26/00 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 1251.23
78623 05/26/00 SHOBERG,CARY J 615911
7-86 2 4 0,5/26 00 AB-- RAHAMSON , REBECCA L.64 :. 50
786:25 05/26/00 ANDERSONI JULIE M 388.11
78626 05/26/00 ANDERSON,TIMOTHY R 189.95
78627 05/26/00 BACHMAN,NICOLE T 86.13
78628 05/26/00 BITTNER,KATIE C 11:6.25
78629 05/26/0 CHAPMA N, JENNY A 446913
78630 05/26/00 DEMPSEY;BETH M 120.10
786.31 05 / 2 6/ 0 0 DeeGRAW , KRY STAL M 240. 61
78.632 05/26/00 ERICKSON,CAROL A 40,40
78.633 05./26/00 FERRISE,CHRISTINA M 177.13
78-634 0 5/ 2 6/ 0 0 FLOR_, MARY PAT 4 6.50
78635 05/26/00 FRUCI,REBECCA L 94.25
78636 05/26/00 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 277.90
78637 05/26/00 HAFNER,ALEXIS J 13.10
78638 05/26/00 HAGGERTY,KATHRYN A 45900
78639 05/26/00 HAWKE,RYAN A 290932
78640 05/26/00 HILLS,CHRISTINE M 1.23950
78641 0 5/ 2 6/ 0 0 HOLMGREN , LEAH M 136085
78642 05/26/00 HORNING,CHRISTOPHER M 201925
78643 05/26/00 HOULE,DENISE L 154.80
78-644 05/26/00 HUPPERT,ERIN M 387.45
78645 05/26/00 IKHAML,JOHN 192.98
32
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR.THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78,64-6 05/26./0,0 JOHNSON ,ROBERT P 2 29.18
78647 05/26/00 JOHNSON 24000
78,1648 05/26/00 JOHNSON,SUSAN M 40950
05/26/00 KERSCHNER,BRANDON R 1170-00
78650 05/26/00 KERSCHNER , JOLENE M 193081
78651 0,5/26/00 KOEHNEN MARY B1 514*72
78652 MEISEL,TAMBREY 254.73
78653 05/26/0-0 MEVERDEN , LAURA J 167o03
78654 05/26/00 MOSSONGANDREA. M 13-9975
78655 05/26/00 MOTZ,ERIN M 1 -39.90
78.656 05/26/00 OIREAGAN,CHRISTINE 164e0,0
78'.657 05/26/00 OLSON,ABIGAIL E 159925
78658 05/26/0-0 OSTEBO,,,BA.RBA—RA C 312.2-0
78 :659 0-5/26/00 OWEN,JONATHAN 152*39
78660 05/26/00 PEHOSKI,JOEL T 121.18
78661 0251/261/00 POWER8,JESSICA 86090
718.662 0-5/26/00 REGESTER, DOUG 20e25
78663 -05/2-:6/00 SMITLEY,SHARON L 222090
78.664 0.5/26/00 STEINKE,JACOB P 176*85
78.665 05/26/00 SWANER,JESSICA 98o40
78666 05/26/00 THELL,HEIDI 36*00
78667 0.5/26/00 TIBODEAU,HEATHER J 71.60
78.668 05/26/00 WEDES,CARYL H 58950
781,669 05/26/00 WELTER,ELIZABETH M 85*15
78670 05/26/00 WHITE,TIMOTHY M 45.85
33
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGSNG.S REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78671 05/26/00 WHITING.,ROBIN A 100.75
78672 05/26/00 WILLIAMS,KELLY M 807.62
78673 05/2.6/00 WOODMAN,,ALICE E 401.20
78674 05/26/00 WORWA,LINDSAY M 52*40
78675 05/26/00 ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L 314*2.5
78676 05/2-6/00 BO-SLEY,CAROL 151*70
78677 05/2:6/00 FLEMING,KATHY A 318*75
78678 05/26/00 FLEMING C 112*50
78679 0. 5/26/00 GROPPOLIlLINDA M 252..00
78680 0,5/26100 HANSEN K 193075
18-6:81 05/26/00 H-ANS EAT ,EMIL J 43*51-0
78.682 05/26/0-0 HORNING,DANELLE M 21.00
78-683 05/26/010 H.UPPERT,.ERICA L 3 0.* 010
78684 05/26/00 JOHNS0N,NANCY A 69.00
78685 05/26/00 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 309*18
78,68-6 0-5/2-6/00 ANTON,.SARAH E 120,606
78687 0,5/26/00 BEiHAN,JAMES 1304.03
7 8,618 8 05/26/00 BLANCHARD,KEVIN J 1,51 * 310
78689 05/26/00 BOTTOLFSON,COLLIN R.6 0031
7:8690 05/26[00 CHAPEAU,GREG M 527.52
78691 015/26/00 DOUGLASS,TOM 168,00
78-692 05/26/00 GREND.ZINSKI,DIANE J 113*40
78693 05/26/00 HEMPFER,NICHOLAS W 25*20
78694 05/26/00 JAHN,DAVID J 1401917
78,695 05/2-6/00 KOSKI,JOHN F 836*03
34
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
mm mft own w
78696
wm mw'm'mw
0.5/26/00
am ftm am mo "m "m aw 4=0 am am am am no am am m ftw'm
KYRK ASHLEY
am am am am am
6,66.00
78697 05/26/00 LONETTI, JAMES F 336.82
78-69.,8 05/26/00 MATTESON,FRANK M 195*61
786.99 05-[26/00 MORIN i 144,00
7870.0 05/26/00 PATTERSON 3
7,8701 26/00 PRINS,KELLY M 189 0.0
787012 05/26/REILLY R 6,84o81
78703 05/26/00 SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M 239.68
78704 0= 5/YOUNG,DILLON J 28398-0
78705 05/26/00 AICHELE,,CRAIG J 11
787106 05/26/00 MULVANEYDENNIS M 1727*23
78707 05/26/00 PRISM, STEVEN A.1555*71
305799.
W_
Agenda No. G Z
AGENDA REPORT
DATE:June 1, 2000
TO: Ie,en Haider
Acting City Manager
FROM: Human Resource Director
SUBJECT: Video Technician
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
As you are aware, there is serious shortage of workers in the labor market at this time,
particularly in positions requiring specialized skills. One such position is Video
Technician. We currently pay a guaranteed minimum of $20 and are having
difficulty finding candidates willing to commit to working for that amount.
We have done some research in the typical pay for these types of jobs and found that
the standard practice is to pay an hourly rate with a minimum guarantee of $50. If
the assignment takes more than four hours, the employee is paid the hourly rate for
each hour worked. If it takes less than four hours, they are paid a flat fee of $S0.
RECOMMENDATION
Please forward the attached revised resolution establishing the pay rates for
temporary, seasonal, and casual part -time employees to the City Council. The
I
provides a minimum guaranteed flat rate of $50 for four or fewer hours of
work for the Video production positions. The current hourly rates will remain in
effect for assignments lasting more than four hours.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, according to the Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations Act, part -
time employees who do not work more than 14 hours per week and temporary /seasonal
employees who work in positions that do not exceed 67 days in a calendar year, or 100 days for
full -time students, are not public employees and are therefore not eligible for membership in a
public employee union.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following pay ranges and job
classifications are hereby established for temporary /seasonal and casual part -time (14 hour or
less) employees effective June 12, 2000, upon Council approval.
Accountant 10.00 -18.00 per hour
Accounting Technician 9.00 -15.00 per hour
Administrative Assistant 9.00 -20.00 per hour
Building Inspector 14.00 -25.00 per hour
Building Maintenance Assistant/Attendant 5.50 -9.00 per hour
Clerk 6.50 -10.00 per hour
Clerk- Typist 8.50 -15.00 per hour
Custodian Maintenance Worker 8.00 -12.00 per hour
Customer Service Assistant 6.00 -10.00 per hour
CSO /Paramedic 12.00 -18.00 per hour
Data Entry Operator 8.00 -12.00 per hour
Election Judge 6.50 - 12.00 per hour
Election Precinct Chair 7.50 -14.00 per hour
Engineering Aide 7.00 -11.00 per hour
Engineering Technician 10.00- $16.00 per hour
Fire Inspector 9.00 -14.00 per hour
Intern 6.50 -14.00 per hour
aborer 6.50 -11.50 per hour
Lifeguard 6.00 -10.00 per hour
Receptionist 7.50 -10.50 per hour
Recreation Instructor /Leader 5.50 -30.00 per hou r
Recreation Official 5.50 -22.00 per game
Recreation Worker 5.50 -15.00 per hour
Secretary 8.50 -18.00 per hour
Vehicle Technician 9.00 -15.00 per hour
Video Coordinator*9.00 -18.00 per hour
Video Technician*8.50 -16.00 per hour
Water Safety Instructor (WSI)6.00 -10.00 per hour
WSI & Head Lifeguard Differential 1.00 per hour
Lifeguards or WSIs working as Head
Lifeguards; Lifeguards working as WSIs)
Video positions shall be paid a guaranteed minimum flat fee of $50 for 4 hours or less.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager shall have the authority to set the pay rate
within the above ranges.
G3
Agenda #
AGENDA REPORT
ion by CouncilTO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
Date - -. 010- - - 0- 11___
Endorsed
Modified
DATE: May 5, 2000.Rejected
RE: Food Permit Waiver of Fee
Introduction
Cub Scout Pack 64 had a fund raiser rummage sale at Cross Lutheran Church on June 10, 2000. In
conjunction with the rummage sale, they sold hot dogs and pop to raise additional money.
Background
Cub Scout Pack 64 is located out of Webster Elementary School. As part of scouting, the members
participate in activities that teach them responsibility and creativity. Some of the events planned for
this year are: scouting for food, pinewood derby, winter camping, and baseball.
To help support these activities, the Pack raises money each year conducting fund- raising events. This
year they chose to have a rummage sale at Cross Lutheran Church. Council approved the permit to be
held in May but due to inclement weather they rescheduled the event for June 10th. To raise additional
funds, they applied for a one -day food permit to sell hot dogs and pop to those attending. They are
requesting that the City waive the $4,3.00 permit fee again for the event.
Recommendation
It is recommended that City Council waive the $43.00 permit fee.
y
Agenda # _
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager
Acdon by CouncH
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
D
DATE: May 5, 2000
Moffed
RE: Renumber 1999 Minutes Rejected
Introduction
As part of the 1999 examination of the city financial statements, a Certification of the Minutes is
conducted. In the preparation of this certification it was found that a misnumbering had occurred. This
was corrected and submitted to the auditors.
The following corrected numbering is submitted for Council approval.
DATE N0.DATE
99
N0.DATE
99
N0.
1 -04 99 CNCL /MGR 5 03 99 CNCL /MGR 9 -07 99
2 -28
CNCL /MGR
1 -11 99 RM 99 -01 5 10 -99 RM 99 -10 9 -13 99 RM 99 -19
1 -25 -99 RM 99 -02 5 24 -99 RM 99 -11 9 -23 99 SP 99 -20
2 -01 -99 CNCL /MGR 6 07 -99 CNCL /MGR 9 -27 99 RM 99 -21
2 -08 -99 RM 99 -03 6 07 -99 SP 99 -12 10 04 99 CNCL /MGR
2 -16 -99 SP 99 -04 6 14 -99 RM 99 -13 10 11 99 RM 99 -22
2 -22 -99 RM 99 -05 6 28 -99 RM 99 -14 10 25 99 RM 99 -23
3 -01 -99 CNCL /MGR 7 06 -99 CNCL /MGR 11 01 99 CNCL /MGR
3 -08 -99 RM 99 -06 7 12 -99 RM 99 -15 11 08 99 RM 99 -24
3 -22 -99 RM 99 -07 7 26 -99 RM 99 -16 11 22 99 RM 99 -25
4 -05 -99 CNCL /MGR 8 -02 99 CNCL /MGR 12 06 99 CNCL /MGR
4 -12 -99 RM 99 -08 8 -09 99 RM 99 -17 12 13 99 RM 99 -26
4 -26 -99 RM 99 -09 8 -23 99 RM 99 -18 12 27 99 RM 99 -27
2000
DATE N0.
1 -03 99 CNCL /MGR
1 -10 99 RM 99 -01
1 -24 99 RM 99 -02
2 -07 99 CNCL /MGR
2 -14 99 RM 99 -03
2 -28 99 RM 99 -04
Recommendation
Approve renumbering as submitted and certified.
MEMO
AGENDA ITEM G S
AGENDA REPORT
Acdon by Council
To: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager ate
From: Steve Lukin, Fire Chief Endorsed
Subject: Rejecting Fire Station Bids Modified
Date: June 6 2000 Rejected
INTRODUCTION
On May 10 of this year, we opened the bids for the new fire station. At that time 'we received only
one bid for many of the area bid packages. In two cases; the area of the steel and roof material there
were no bids submitted.
Based on the bid pricing we received and by using Kraus Anderson's estimated cost on the two bid
areas that we received no bids on, the overall cost for the station was considerably higher than was
budgeted for. At this tune, our plan is to go out for bid at a future date.
RECOMMENDATION
I request the council to reject all bids that were submitted and opened in regards to thepg new MaplewoodFireStationbasedonlackofbidsupportandthecost.
c: City Clerk
Agenda No. G(o
Action by Council
DATE.
TO*
FROM0
June 6, 2000
Ken Haider
Acting City Manager
Sherrie
Human Resource Director
AGENDA REPORT Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
SUBJECT: AFSCME Contract .Amendment
We recently completed a compensation study of certain positions requested by
AFSCME which included a market analysis. After comparing the positions'
responsibilities with other comparable positions in the Stanton Group V cities, we
Found that several positions were underpaid as compared to the median of the
market. We have negotiated the results of the studies with AFSCME and have
reached agreement to resolve this issue. The proposed agreement is attached.
RECOMMENDATION
Please forward this proposed agreement to the City Council for their approval along
with authorization for the Finance Director to make the appropriate budget
adjustments.
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
Between
THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
And
A.F.S.C.M.E. Local 2725
The City of Maplewood and A. F. S. C. M. E. Local 2 725 hereby agree to the followiny '
Upon execution of this document by both parties, and approval of this contract
amendment by the City Council,the 2000 pay range for the following classifications
will be:
Job Title Start 1 Yr. 3 Yr.4 Yr. 8 Yr. 12 Yr.* 16 Yr.
Accountant 19.73 22.19 24.66 25.40 25.89
VEM Technician 13.34 15.01 16.68 17.18 17.51
Sr. Engineering Tech.17.79 20.02 22.24 22.91 23.35 23.80 24.24
Building Inspector 18.31 20.60 22.89 23.58 24.03
Associate Planner 18.21 20.48 22.76 23.44 23.90 24.35
CSO 12.18 13.70 15.22 15.68 15.98
Refer to Article 35.2 -- Longevity
For the Union:For the City of Maplewood
Date: Date:
AGENDA nrEM
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Community Development Director A.4
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit — Yard Waste Transfer Site
LOCATION: Beam Avenue, west of Hazelwood Street
DATE: May 22, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Action by Cecil
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
City staff recently received a petition requesting that the city council hold a public information
hearing about the conditional use permit (CUP) for the Ramsey County yard waste transfer site.
See the petition on page three.) This site is on Beam Avenue, west of Hazelwood Street.
BACKGROUND
May 9, 1994: The city council reviewed and amended the CUP for the Ramsey County compost
site.
August 8, 1994: The city council accepted a report from the county about the compost site. The
council directed the county to continue researching conditions and techniques for compost site
operations.
August 14, 1995: The city council extended the CUP for one year and amended Condition 14 to
require that the county submit a status report to the city on a yearly basis regarding the compost
site.
August 9, 1996: The city council reviewed the permit and listened to neighborhood residents'
concerns with the compost site. A motion was made and seconded to reduce the size of the
compost to 10,000 cubic yards. This motion resulted in a split vote -2 nays and 2 ayes (Mayor
Bastian was absent). This item was then tabled for two weeks for full council consideration.
On October 14, 1996, the city approved a revision to the conditional use permit for the Ramsey
County Compost Site, making the site subject to 17 conditions. The conditions of this approval
included not allowing composting or yard waste management on the site after the spring of 1997
and allowing the County to make some improvements to the site. (See the minutes starting on
page 4.) These changes made the operation only a yard waste transfer site, not a compost site.
At the November 13, 1998, city council meeting, Mr. Bob Zick spoke under the visitor
presentation part of the meeting about the Ramsey County Compost Site. He had several
concerns about possible violations at the site. After Mr. Zick spoke, staff reviewed the
procedures and conditions of operation for the yard waste site and found that there were no
violations at the site.
On December 27, 1999, the city council again considered a review of the Ramsey County Yard
Waste transfer site. At that meeting, the mayor made a motion to set a public hearing to review
or possibly change the CUP for the site, but the motion died for a lack of a second. As such, the
council took no action on the site.
DISCUSSION
Site Operations
It was a relatively quiet year in 1999 for the yard waste transfer site on Beam Avenue. City staff
received one complaint late last summer about inadequate collections of grass clippings. The
complainant indicated that the County's hauler was not picking up materials the required three
times a week. Staff checked out the complaint and found that the hauler had made a
determination not to pick up all three days because there was not enough material at the site to
make a full truck load. According to the County, this happened five times in the months of June,
July and August.
After Ramsey county officials found out about this they notified the hauler to make the required
pick ups regardless of the amount of material on the site or the cost to the County. It is staff's
understandingg that this operational issue has been resolved. Staff did not see this complaint
meeting our standards for initiating enforcement of a violation. Staff saw this as a fiscal and
fairness issue between maintaining a public facility, that benefits the overall community, against
the fact that the amount of yard waste found at the site was so insignificant that it would be a
waste of city and county resources to pursue this further.
With the exception of the above mentioned incident the County is meeting all the conditions that
the - city set for the site in 1996. Neither the city staff nor county staff is proposing an changes to
the site or to the site operation.
p g Y g
In July 1999, the Saint Paul - Ramsey County Department of Public Health sent a letter to
Maplewood residents explaining some of the history and recent activities of the Beam Avenue
yard waste site. I have included a copy of their letter (starting on page seven forg ) ourY
information. This letter acknowledges that several nearby residents have sued Ramsey County.Y
This lawsuit against the County is proceeding, however, the suit against Maplewood has been
dismissed. (See the article from the October 1999 Minnesota Cities amagazineon e 11.g page )
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit (CUP) for the Ramsey County Yard Waste Site on Beam
Avenue and direct staff to work with Ramsey County to make changes to the site or to the site
operations as the council deems necessary.
p:sec3lcompost4.mem
Attachments:
1. Neighbors Petition
2. 10 -14 -96 Council minutes
3. 7 -22 -99 Health Department letter
4. October 1999 Minnesota Cities magazine, page 18
Attachment 1
PETITION TO APPEAR BEFORE THE CITY OF 12APLEWOOD
We, the undersigned, are requesting a .public information hearing with the
city of Maplewood regarding the conditional use permit for the Beam
AvenVe compost site.
TV2
K.
s
br'v'
35 4cLA 1nn,.•
r
004
7
0
1
r
l +LW4
VV
Attachment 2
1. Ramsey County Compost Site Conditional Use Permit Review (Beam Avenue)
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
h. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the
report.
c. Mayor Basti an asked i f anyone wi shed to speak before the Counci 1
regarding .this matter. The following were heard:
Zach Hanson. Ramsey County Health Department
Ralph Sletten: 2749 Clarence •
Patrick O'Brien, 2759 Hazelwood Avenue
Dan Sletten. 2199 Helen Street, No. St. Paul
James Behrens, 1395 Kohlman
d. Counci 1 member Al l enspach introduced the following Resolution and moved
its adoption:
96 - 10 - 116
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development is requesting that the City
Council change the conditional use permit - condi ti ons for a compost site on Beam
Avenue:
WHEREAS. this permit applies to he property on the sduth side of Beam Avenue,
west of the railroad right -of -way. The legal description is:
Lots 81-84. Gardena Addition in the North 112 of the SW 114
of Section 3, Township 29. Range 22.
WHEREAS. the_ii story of this conditional use ermi t is as fol l ows :
1. On April 4. 1994. the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve these changes.
17 . 14
4
r
2 . On May 9. .1994, the City Council held a ubl is hearing. The City staff
published a notice in the paper and sent no ices to the surrounding property
owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak- and
resent written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations of the Ci ty staff and planning Commission.
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the conditions for the above-described permit
shall read as follows:
1, The site may be open to the public between March 24 and December 6 of
each year,
2. The site may be open to the public between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and
8:00 p.m
3. The County shall provide at least one monitor at the site for all hours
that it is open to the public.
4. The site shall accept only the following materials: wood chips, arden
waste.- lawn cuttings, weeds,, pruni ngs of soft-bodied pl ants , Yeaves
along with materials like pine cones, fruit and small twigs that people
pick up with their yard waste. Ramsey County shall monitor and remove
any unacceptable materials left at the site.
5 The City prohibits the dumping or storing of the following materials:
brush, branches, garbage or refuse.
6. This permit shall have a five-(5) year term.
7. The County shall manage the yard waste site to minimize the amount of
objectionable odors.
8. The Community Development Department shall handle odor com 1 ai nts during
regular business. hours and the olice department shal handle odor
comp l ai nt s after regular hours . T e inspector shall verify and measure
whether there is an odor that violates the odor standards of this
permit. To determine if there is a violation of this permit, the
inspector shall follow the procedures in Attachment A of this permit,
A violation of this permit shall occur when the inspector has recorded
ten sni ffi ngs of the ambient air over a period of thirty minutes with a
geometric average OIRS of (a) 3.0 or greater if the property at which
the testing is being conducted contains a permanent residence or (b) 4.0
or greater if the property at which the testing is being conducted does
not contain a permanent residence. (See Attachment B of this permit for
a description of the odor scale.) If there is a violation, the
inspector shall investigate to establish the source of the odor. The
City shall notify the County of the violation. The County shall advise
the City of the reason for the problem and correct it to meet the
standards of this permit. The County or site operator shall cooperatewiththeCityoritsrepresentativeregardingsuchinvestigations.
9. County shall monitor and remove unapproved items from the site.
10. The County shall be allowed to complete the rocess of composting the
leaves that were collected in the fall of 19 5 and spring of 1996 and
that are on site as of October 1, 1996. This material will be
cons i dered —f i ni shed in the spring of 1997.
11. Beginning with material received in the fall of 1996, the site shah
operate as a transfer site. Leaves received during April -May and
October- November transferred from the site on a regular basis. Leaves
may not be stored on site for a period of longer than three (3) weeks.
18 10 -14 -96
5
In the event of weather conditions, such as a snowstorm in the fall
t hat recl ude haul -outout of leaves within three weeks , theP
iDirectorofCommunitytyDeveloent _may grant pe rmisson to the county
to store leaves on the nort part of .the site until such time that x
the leaves may be hauled out. Under such circumstances, leaves
shall be removed from the site by April of the following year.
The County shall have the grass clippings removed from the site June-
QSe tember at least three times a week or other days if necessary to help
prevent objectionable odors.
12. The County shall place wood chips and finished compost on site for
citizens to take.
13. The County is re uested by the City to look for an alternate yard waste
site in the port east part" of the County that would be used to reduce
the. traffic at the site on Beam Avenue.
1 4 The Count shall make best efforts to develop a yard waste compostingCounty
site on County roperty i n the vicinity of the Workhouse, north of LowerPiAftonRoadi .. The site would be u to 10 acres n size, and would not be
open for residents to drop of material . The City will assist the
County in obtaining permits for this site.
15. The southern part of the site on Beam Avenue shall not be used for yard
waste management by the County after the spring of 1997.
16. Should the County be unsuccessful in siting and permitting a site in the
vicinity of the Workhouse. then the City Council will review this permit
and may allow the County.-to compost material on the northern portion of
the site on Beam Avenue.
17. The County is granted permission to make improvements to the site
including: widening and paving the entrance. road; installing a new,
wider gate: installing four light posts and fixtures: and installing
traffic control signs.
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers
Allenspach, Koenpp
Nays - Councilmember Rossbach
2. Hazelwood Forest Preliminary Plat (County Road C)
Attachment 3
Saint Paul - Ramsey County
Department of Public Health
Rob Fulton, Director
RnnnsEVCOUnmr
July 22, 1999
Dear Maplewood Resident:
Environmental Health section
1670 Beam Avenue = Suite A
Maplewood, MN 55109 -1176
651 -773 -4444 Fax: ' 651- 773 -4454
You may have recently received a letter, or heard from neighbors, about health
concerns related to yard waste composting, specifically Ramsey Count andy
waste site on Beam Avenue in Maplewood.
Communications about this issue have unnecessarily raised fears about yard
waste and composting. Consequently, we are writing to provide you with
accurate information about this matter.
First, we want to acknowledge that several families who live near the yard waste
site on Beam Avenue have sued Ramsey County. These lawsuits are in their
early stages. Many allegations have been made without evidence to support
them. Ramsey County has denied all these allegations.
On June 18, 1999, Dr. Patrick Williams of Benchmark Genetics sent a letter to
a number of homes in the community. Dr. Williams claimed to be part of a
study sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), a federal agency.
The researcher under contract with CDC, Dr. Noah Seixas of the University of
Washington School of Public Health, has informed us that Dr. Williams' claim is
false. Neither the CDC nor Dr. Seixas are involved in the work in Maplewood.
A copy of Dr. Seixas letter is attached. Dr. Williams has been hired by the
plaintiffs in the lawsuit against Ramsey County, and is not an independent
researcher.
The site on Beam Avenue has been the subject of intense scrutiny, especially
since 1990 when the State's yard waste ban went into effect and the site
started to handle more leaves and grass clippings. A variety of State, regional
and local agencies have reviewed, inspected or analyzed the site. The
conclusion has always been the same: the site has been well run and does not
pose a threat to the environment or public health. The Beam Avenue site has
been operated as a transfer site since 1997, with material being removed
frequently from the site. There has not been composting at this site since the
shift to a transfer site in 1997.
Composting is a safe method to handle yard waste. There are over 3,000 public
yard waste sites in the United States, including 86 in Minnesota and nine in
Ramsey County (Ramsey County operates eight sites, including the Beam
Avenue site, and the City of Roseville has one). The Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) regulates yard waste sites, including all the Ramsey
County ones. Its regulations for composting, which were developed after
qllx printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 20% post- consumer content E
extensive research and public input, exist,to protect public health and the
environment.
The MPCA has recently written to the County that "Staff' from the MPCA ` ^`9
inspected the Ramsey County Beam Avenue Yard Waste Site on numerous_-
occasions during its period of operation and found the site to be in compliance
with the compost rules and producing a valuable soil conditioning product...
Although Ramsey County ceased to compost yard waste at the Maplewood site
in the spring of 1997, when it did compost yard waste it operated a well run site
that produced a valuable soil conditioning product. "
The Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance (OEA) has written to the
County that "the OEA recognizes Ramsey County's yard waste system as an
excellent system. The County has had a program since the early 1984's which
has grown and changed to serve the citizens of the County. The OEA
participated in a technical review of the Maplewood site in 1994, and in that
review concluded, along with other people on the technical review panel, that
the site was well sited and operated, and was ' a model urban yard waste
composting site."
There is a big difference between allegations and facts. Health and
environmental effects of composting have been studied around the world, and
there is no evidence that compost sites cause illness or property damage, as
alleged in the lawsuit. Further, there is nothing unique about the Beam
Avenue site that would cause it to be different from the many other yard waste
saes in the country.
If you believe that you need to have your home tested for molds I stronglygy
encourage you to contact the Minnesota Department of Health to get that
agency's listing of businesses in the State that provide indoor air quality
measuring services. These businesses are qualified to properly sample andpyp
interpret the results. Staff at MDH are also available to interpret testing results,
and to answer questions about the health effects of molds.
If you have further questions about various matters related to yard waste and
composting, we have made arrangements for various agency staff to answer
your questions. The listing is included as an attachment to this letter. Please
feel free to call any of them to learn more about this issue. We have also
provided a list of fact sheets available on various topics.
inc y,
Rob Fulton, Director
Saint Paul - Ramsey County Department of Public Health
E'3
Subject Name and Telephone Number
Indoor Air Mr. Larry Olson, Indoor Air Consultant
Quality Minnesota Department of Health
including molds 651- 215 -0912
Pesticide Use and Mr. Chuck Stroebel
Management Environmental Scientist - Health Risk Assessment Unit
Minnesota Department of Health
651- 215 -0919
Yard Waste Jeff Connell, Compliance Coordinator
Management -Minnesota Pollution Control Agency °
Regulations 651- 296 -7271
Roberta Wirth
Senior Pollution ,Control Specialist
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
651- 296 -7384
Yard Waste Sig Scheurle,
Management -Supervisor
Methods and Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance
Operations 651- 215 -0197
Roberta Wirth
Senior Pollution Control Specialist
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
651- 296 -7384
Thomas Halbach
State Specialist - Waste Management & Water Quality
University of Minnesota Extension Service
Dept. of Soil, Climate and
612 -625 -3135
Backyard Thomas Halbach
Composting,State Specialist - Waste Management & Water Quality
Use of Compost University of Minnesota Extension Service
Dept. of Soil, Climate and
651- 625 -3135
Maplewood Yard Zack Hansen, Manager
Waste Site Environmental Health Section
History Saint Paul - Ramsey County Department of Public Health
651 -773 -4440
Melinda Coleman
Director of Community Development
City of Maplewood
651- 770 -4562
For World Wide Web sites about composting and sources of fact sheets,
please see the next page.
9
World Wide Web Sites about Compostlin -
The Composting Council:
http: / / compostingcouncil. ors /
Cornell University:
http: / /www.cals.cornell.edu jdept /compost /, ComlDOStinHomepae.htrnl
The Compost Resource Page
htt : jwww.oldfrowth.Org jcompost
Fact Sheets About Indoor Air Quality and Compostln
From the Minnesota Department of Health, please see the enclosed order form.
University of Minnesota Extension Service
1. Fact Sheets and Bulletins can be obtained via the World Wide Web at
www.extension.umn.edu
2. INFO -U is a free public service of the University of Minnesota Extension Service.
Telephone messages and fax services also are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
using a touch -tone phone.. Phone (612) 624 -2200 in the Metro area, or (800) 525 -8636
in !Greater Minnesota. Follow voice instructions to make your selections.
Extension Service Fact Sheet titles that may be of interest are:
Molds - Your Safe Home
WW- 6944 -GO
Environmentally Conscious Methods of Pest Control In and Around Homes
FO- 6269 -GO
Moisture in Basements - Causes and Solutions
FO- 7051 -GO
Assessing Indoor Air Quality
InfoU Number 667
How to Prevent Mildew Growth
InfoU Number 648
10
Attachment 4
P L A N N I N G
County immune from suit in
fatal bridge collision
Mother of a nineteen - year -old motor-
ist, who was killed when his vehicle
collided with a bridge railing, sued the
county for failing to install approach
guard rails. On appeal from summary
judgment in favor of the county, the
Minnesota Supreme Court held that
the county's decision not to install
approach .guard rails at the end of the
bridge was a policy decision based
on engineering and economic consid-
erations. Although the bridge was
old,_ the court stated, county policy to
maintain a bridge in its as -built condi-
tion until replacement funds become
available is a. planning level decision
entitled to immunity. Fisher v. County
of Rock, N.W.2d (Minn. July
15 1999) .
V I C A R I O U S L I A B I L I T Y
County not liable for decision
to plow against traffic
Trustee for the estate of two deceased
motorists brought negligence suit
against county after motorists struck
county snowplow traveling against
traffic. The district court denied the
county's motion for summary judg-
ment, holding that the plow operator
was not entitled to immunity because
his duties were ministerial. The Minne-
sota Court of Appeals reversed, stating
that because snow removal activities
are inherently dangerous, an equipment
operator must be allowed discretion in
choosing the best way to complete the
task. The court further refused to find
the county vicariously liable for the
plow operator's decision, fearing that
refusal to extend immunity ... would
chill the county's ability to permit
snow removal workers the discretion
necessary to safely. ..remove snow and
ice from public roadways." Menk v.
County of Cottonwood, No. CO -99 -13
Minn. App. May 25, 1999) (unpub-
lished opinion).
N U I S A N C E
County composting facility
raises stink
In 1991, city provided county with
a conditional use permit to assume
operation of city's leaf composting
facility. After repeated complaints
that the facility was producing noxi-
ous odors, residents brought suit against
the city and the county. The district
court granted the city's motion for
summary judgment because the statute
of limitations precluded residents'
claims prior to 1991, but denied the
county's motion for summary judg-
ment, holding that the county was not
immune from liability in its operation
of the facility. The Minnesota Court
of Appeals affirmed, holding that deci-
sions regarding the storage and transfer
of compost materials are operational.
Though judgment is required in the
daily operation of the facility, the court
concluded, these decisions merely imp-
lement the county's planning decisions
and, therefore, do not rise to the level
of policy - making required for immu-
nity. Sletten v. City of Maplewood et al.,
No. C 7 -98 -2377 (Minn. App. Aug.
10, 1999) (unpublished opinion).
SEARCH & SEIZURE
No deprivation of right absent
proof of malice
Acting on information provided by
informant, police officers obtained
search warrant and searched residence
for crack cocaine. Officers found no
drugs at the residence. Homeowners
brought suit against the city, alleging
officers knowingly and maliciously
searched the wrong residence. On
appeal from summary judgment in
favor of the officers, the Minnesota
11
Court of Appeals rejected the home-
owners' argument that the informant's
known drug habit and the deficiencies
in the warrant request substantiated
a finding of malice. Although once
inside the officers may have had cause
to suspect they had entered the wrong
residence, the court concluded, their
decision to secure the residence was
a discretionary judgment that entitled
them to immunity. Brewer v. City of
St. Paul, N.W.2d _ (Minn.
App. 1999).
E M P L O Y M E N T
Court affirms termination
of police chief
Based on allegations of misconduct,
the city suspended its police chief
pending the outcome of an indepen-
dent investigation. At the end of the
investigation, the city council met in
closed session to discuss the allegations.
The next month, the council met
again in closed session to discuss fur-
ther allegations. At the conclusion
of that session, the council opened
the meeting and unanimously voted
for termination based on the findings
of the investigator. The chief then
requested and received a hearing where
he argued for an additional hearing
before an impartial body. The council
affirmed the termination and the chief
filed for review with the Minnesota
Court of Appeals. The court held that
the chief was not denied due process
because the council's decision to ternii-
nate was supported by the record and
consistent with the city's personnel
procedures. Anderson v. City of Blue
Earth, No. C 2 -99 -112 (Minn. App.
Aug. 24, 1999) (unpublished opinion)
Note: LMC defended the city of Blue
Earth in this case).
Writen by C. Charles Walters, law
clerk /research analyst with the League
of Minnesota Cities.
18 MINNESOTA CITIES 0CTOItEIt 1 99 9
City of Maplewood
Official Sign -Up Sheet
By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the
Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes.
VA
5.
6.
7.
s.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
F 'W - -
Name (first & last) - please print Address
14.
3
40
AGENDA ITEM NO H Z
MEMORANDUM
TO. City Manager Action by Cecil
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit — Mogren Brothers Landscaping Date
LOCATION: Behind (West of ) 2599 White Bear Avenue Endorsed
DATE: May 23, 2000 Modified
Rejected
INTRODUCTION
Bob Mogren, of Mogren Brothers Landscaping, is requesting that the city council reconsider his
proposed conditional use permit (CUP) for outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment and
landscaping materials. Refer to the letter on page 17. This storage yard is behind the
commercial building at 2599 White Bear Avenue Refer to the maps on pages 7 -10. Mr. Mogren
moved the vehicles, equipment and materials to this site from his previous location south of
National Tire and Battery (NTB) across from Rainbow Foods. Currently, Mr. Mogren has
removed the equipment but still has some materials on the site stored on pallets.
BACKGROUND
On December 27, 1999, the city council denied the application for the outdoor storage of
landscape materials and related equipment. At this meeting, a petition from eight neighborhood
residents was submitted, asking the council to deny the request.
On April 24, 2000, the city council agreed to re- consider the application and directed staff to
schedule a new public hearing.
DISCUSSION
Screening
The most frequent concern expressed by neighbors is the need for screening. Most of the
neighbors (commercial and residential) indicated they thought the storage yard should be hidden
if approved. One neighbor suggested that Mr. Mogren move this storage yard out of town. With
the people I spoke to, it was unanimous that the applicant's previous storage yard across from
the Mapleridge Shopping Center was not an attractive site. Staff, as well as many of the
neighbors, agree that if allowed to remain, this site should be screened. The city code states
that screening may be required for outside storage yards.
Staff feels that a screen of evergreen trees would provide the visual barrier needed. Mr. Mogren
has proposed to plant a combination of spruce and pine trees to create the screen. These trees
would be six to eight feet tall and planted in two staggered rows at 15 feet on center.
Staff likes the applicant's plan for the most part, but has the following suggestions:
1. The tree spacing should be lessened for a tighter screen. The proposed 15 -foot spacing is
measured diagonally between trees in the two rows. As measured in straight lines, the trees
would be spaced 23 feet on center. To achieve a tighter visual screen, the applicant should
plant the trees in each row at 15 feet on center. This would improve the visual screen.
2. The opening proposed for the White Bear Avenue access drive should be narrowed from 70
feet to 20 feet. This would improve the screen.
3. The applicant should install wetland protection buffer signs at the steel -post barrier as code
requires.
4. The gap in the trees behind 2599 White Bear Avenue should be filled in to be a continuous
planting row.
Inoperable Vehicles
If the council approves this CUP, they should require that inoperable vehicles not be allowed to
be kept on this site. These vehicles should also be required to be licensed.
Fire Chief's Concern
At the time of this previous review, Maplewood Fire Chief, Joel Hewitt, stated that he has no
current concerns with this proposed storage yard. If Mr. Mogren expands the yard, or increases
the types and quantities of materials stored there, however, the council should require a paved
access drive. This issue could be studied during future CUP reviews.
Noise
One neighbor is concerned about truck noise and commotion from the access next to their house
west side of the car wash). If approved, the council should require hours of operation to comply
with Maplewood's noise ordinance. Section 19 -48(a) requires that "no person shall make or
cause to be made any distinctly and loudly audible noise that unreasonably annoys, disturbs,
injures or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety or welfare of any person or
precludes their enjoyment of property or affects their property value. Any violation of this general
prohibition between the hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Saturday and all day Sunday
is a violation of this article."
Zoning Classifications
The applicant's property has two zoning classifications. The westerly 150 feet is zoned F (farm
residential) and the majority, the easterly 225 feet, is zoned BC (business commercial). The
applicant's vehicles and materials are entirely on the BC portion about 40 feet from the F -zoned
part.
Wetlands
Much of the applicant's vehicles, equipment and materials are within 100 feet of the creek to the
south. The Ramsey /Washington Metro Watershed District has classified this creek as a Class 1
wetland. This means that the applicant must keep all items in his storage yard at least 100 feet
from the edge of the wetland. (Rob Langer, of the watershed district, said we should consider
the midpoint of the slope as the wetland edge.) Right now, the storage yard is about 50 feet from
the wetland.
2
Mr. Mogren's landscape plan proposes to meet the 100 -foot- setback requirement. The row of
barrier posts would block access to this buffer.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution on pages 14 -15 approving a conditional use permit for the outdoor storage
of. landscape materials and related equipment and vehicles behind 2599 White Bear Avenue.
Approval is based on the findings required by the code and subject to:
1. Compliance with the site /landscape plan date- stamped December 15, 1999, however, the
applicant shall revise the plan as follows: (the director of community development may
approve minor changes):
a. Tighten the tree spacing in both rows to 15 feet on center. As viewed straight on, the
trees would then be 7.5 feet apart.
b. The opening proposed for the White Bear Avenue access drive should be narrowed from
the proposed 70 feet to 20 feet.
c. The applicant should install wetland protection buffer signs at the steel -post barrier as
code requires. There should be at least three signs which prohibit any building, mowing,
cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer.
d. The gap in the trees behind 2599 White Bear Avenue should be filled in to be continuous.
e. The two gravel driveways shall consist of 1 % inch clear rock.
2. The trees shall be planted and the rock approaches installed by August 12, 2000.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant shall keep all parts of this storage yard on the BC -zoned portions of his
property.
5. The applicant shall move all equipment, vehicles and materials at least 100 feet north of the
midpoint of the creek slope.
6. There shall be no noise - making, business activity conducted in the storage yard, or made by
vehicles entering or leaving the storage yard, between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through
Saturday or all day Sunday as required by code. During snow events, the applicant may
store on the site but must use White Bear Avenue for entering and exiting the site.
7. The applicant shall not store any inoperable vehicles on this site.
3
CITIZEN COMMENTS
I surveyed the 39 surrounding property owners within 350 feet of this property for their
comment about this proposal. Of the nine replies, three were in favor, five were opposed and
there was one miscellaneous comment. .
In Favor
1. Bob Mogren has been a good neighbor and I feel his storing equipment is fine and should
be approved. (David Trepanier, 2170 6th Street)
2. The Gerald Mogren family is in favor of allowing Robert Mogren.to continue to store his
equipment and materials on this site. Storage has been allowed for years on this property
and this is not a change from what it has been used for, for years. (Bruce Mogren, 2966
White Bear Avenue)
3. 1 do not have a problem with Mr. Mogren storing his equipment at either location the old one
or the new location, but if it is an eyesore I feel that there should be a privacy fence required
to hide the equipment. Myself and the rest of Maplewood residents should not have to look
at it. (Gerald Meyer, Perfect Image, 2645 White Bear Avenue)
Opposed
1. I feel that having a bunch of equipment and materials visible to my tenants distracts from
value as well as we look like a junkyard. I am very opposed to this. (Brian Pellowski,
Maplewood Auto Center, 2525 White Bear Avenue)
2. Refer to the letter on pages 11 -12 from David Hesley, 2607 White Bear Avenue.
3. 1 called the City of Maplewood a month ago and complained about the junk Mogrens had
behind 2599 White Bear Avenue. Since then, it has been cleaned up somewhat. I oppose
Mogrens getting an OK to use this area as storage because once they do, it will become a
real junk yard. I work at 2599 White Bear Avenue and I see this almost daily. Let Mogrens
store this equipment and materials at property they own outside of town. (Bresnahan, 1862
County Road C)
4. 1 object because of:
a. increased runoff going into their yard.
b. visual unsightliness.
c. dumping of materials in the storage yard.
d. increased commercial traffic in this residential area.
e. noise and commotion from increased traffic going past the west end of the car wash
where Mr. Mogren installed a gravel driveway. ( Guzzo, 1876 County Road C)
In addition to these comments, refer to the letter from Ms. Guzzo on page 13.
5. If this is approved require Mr. Mogren to install a screening fence to hide the storage yard.
Porter, Regal Car Wash)
4
Miscellaneous Comment
My only concern is how much traffic from this equipment going in and out of there is this going
to create. There is already a lot . of traffic from vehicles going in and out of the car wash on
County Road C. Some of this equipment is large and very noisy. _(Brian and Arlene Frokjer,
1883 County Road C)
5
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 3.9 acres
Existing land use: Undeveloped except for the materials and equipment stored there. by Mr. Mogren
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Regal Car Wash
South: Maplewood Auto Center
West: Undeveloped property owned by Ramsey County Open Space
East: A multi - tenant medical clinic
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: BC (business commercial) and R1 (single dwelling residential)
Zoning: BC and F (farm residential)
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36- 151(b )(4) requires a CUP for the exterior storage, display, sale or distribution of goods or
materials. The city may require screening of such uses pursuant to the screening requirements of
clause 6(a).
Clause 6(a) requires screening of at least 80 percent of the use from the highest topographical point of
the nearest residential lot lines.
Criteria for Conditional Use Permit Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. Refer to
the findings 1 -9 in the resolution on pages 14 --15.
p:secl11mogren.cup
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Land Use Plan Map
3. Property Line /Zoning Map
4. Site /Landscape Plan Reduction date - stamped December 15, 1999
5. Letter form David Hesley dated November 5, 1999
6. Letter from Carol Guzzo dated December 16, 1999
7. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
8. Petition submitted on 12 -27 -99
9. Letter from Mr. Mogren dated April 3, 2000
10. Site /Landscape Plan date - stamped December 15, 1999
0
Attachment 1
ffi i
in
u6w
NO
JuNcnm
llbw
Wk
ST
t
sau.
LOCATION MAP 4
N
Attachment-2...
Vadnais Heights
I -
I
I --
I
minlor arterial
a
0
0
ro
Co:-=Rd. C
UUM
R -2
CO
major collector
M -1
1
Z
v
0
N•
C
N
c
W
Z
V
r
c
law
O
v
d
0
V
O
E
interchange
major
s
11
f f
fa
ALk
f•fa• _
LAND USE MAP
HAZELWOOD
4
N
Attachment 3
no
u
I - Z -0 1 It _ ---,, _ OUNTY ROAD Cit.4Al w w.i 3 • Z .. •
0
ISO t-1 fool0z ° .
83 •.86,3 f` .::• / 2 \ 070 ti
y oft 1862 1876 J z
10 CAR WASH . _ ;
23
180. 04 - v '
o a ! ' Z , METRO LAWN &
Z POWER EQUIPMENTC -.
22 3 0 } {k•':•r f {'od fv''•{•: -• rv.••.•1 • . •. , r r.,. { f.}';{ Mfr, :.•:,'}rf' '9 z g r; { -- -R* :... -•r ... f KENNETH ' S,sff• % r . rr ,rr fir•. • • : "' . .tiYti., ti' ' f r } •
tire ClJ.f •: f {i . • -, HAIR STYLING214 _ { } {r
QQ {
r'•f }•r DAVID H HESLEY
20 s .
fz . }f...ti:. {..;..r.. #:. }:...... `=CPA
o s} p •f.,:c• }ter: • : 0 ,Y••• ••• }yam •• L • { {,5218179.1 In ? ..
f .: _ f03a • •...
MESHBESHER19Q ' } . :•': - - --
6 r: {v r .,;fir { • .
roo,r:r,• `• SPENCE LAWYERS
BACHMAN'Srnfi , PROPOSED
7 Lu ;;:fir,:; ? } •{' {• f
OUTDOOR
r1, STORAGE
r
AREA OFFICES -v
Z4 Q
f .. {:;.< f:yrr ;•r ' ..• ,
0 ObWlw A (z 10)
k r f •a N
N
1
SUPER AMERICAimom , ,.. ; j . OFFICES —.
40)
23242 62.7 . as 2!
01 MAPLEWOOD AUTO CENTER a 1 -
1 O zZ) { r O 1 + ... VAC »• i•.• •4 i . VACATEp —.
I—r01ra - tr
T
sj
W E T
0 N NTB XMAPLERIDGEE
r SHOPPING Nr
CENTER I
S,
0
s
t
2
12.79.2
I i o - 12 . a o I 1.3 . a.. •
as
i o r 12.83 aw
FUTURE
PEP BOYS
O
Y
33
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
9
4
N
7
Attachment 4
County Roan
M
Y
00 039 440'
4l
rr. 164nof
sop .1
rage oofTkloP' -.
White Be•
T I
SITE /LANDSCAPE PLAN
10
4
N
2607 WHITE BEAR AVENUE • MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 • OFFICE .(651) 770 -8505 • FAx (651) 770 -0627 • Email:. dhesley@dhesley.com
Peg ?
i have requested Mr. Mogren to reimburse me for those expenses. , He has not
honored my requests, therefore, [have currently suspended his use of ,y land.
Therefore I have reservations recommending an approval by the city council to
allow him to continue storin a ui merit and landscaping materials behind, the9qp _ -
office building at 2599 White Bear Avenue, All the commercial ..property owners
are aware Mr.. justMoren recently cleaned up this site and organized the9
vehicles in anticipation of this approval Because Mr C Mogren has had no regard
for the cleanliness. and upkeep of his property and the effect it has had on all of
his nei hborin - commercial properties in the past eighteen months, and since he9gpPp
showed a lack of environmental concern for our wetlands, not to mention the
uamcal a done to m prop b his employees' negligence, I am skeptical he9YpPYY .
future. -havior n the 1 ama firm that shouldwould :change his be
be judged based on their actions - and not on - their promises.
YFurthermorebackin1997thecity refused to approve a lot split between the
Mo rens and myself on this very same land in question until the Mogrens camegYY -
u with a feasibility plan as to what their future intentions with respect to thispYp _
land. Shouldn't the Mo rens be subject to the same requirement as the rest of
us taxpayers? Why shouldn't Mr. Mogren be required to submit a feasibility plan
indicating his future usage of this property?
Y
respectfully request the city council deny Mr. Mogren from storing anypYqY
equipment and landscaping materials behind our offices until he indicates ap9
future use p Ian of the land and he meet specific conditions with regards to
upkeep and location of the stored equip requested by the city. Also denyupp
him the prighttopileu snow for commercial purposes, which has been9p
contaminated by oil and gas from parking lots which can be damaging to our
wetlands.
Should Y Yyouneedan additional information or-have any questions of me
f ; ealuin this matter, pieas: do not hesitate to contact me directly.g
Since ly,
David H. Hesley
Certified Public ntant
DHH:bar
F:\ data\ clientsVetters \EkstrandreMogren.ltr
DEC 16-1999 15 :29 FR RT —E LAND 0 LAKES N 612 481 2002 TO 9651 7704506 P.01/01
Attachment 6
Dear City Planners,
Y
In regards to the request to dump show in the property next to mine. I have listened to
trucks dumping snow (and other items) all hours of the night the past few years. I did try
to notify the city office, but they were closed, which only left me the option of calling
911, which I felt was to be used only in an emergency. The run off, when the snow
melted, has been eroding my backyard, not to mention the garba that has been blowing
into my yaard. About 2 weeks ago, they dumped gravel to make a access road from
County Road c., which is right outside my bedroom window, only 7 feet away. For
years I have put up with the car Wash's noise all day, revery day, which was built 30 feet
away from my Bedroom window. Now you want me to put up with Truchas driving back
and forth at all hours of the night and the banging of tailgates. Therefore I do not
approve on the dumping of snow or any material on this location.
On the matter of storing equipment and landscaping supplies on the property next to
mine. For the past few years, vehicles have been stored there and they look like junk,
several don't even hav current licenses. They just recently clean up some of that meM
en that equipment and landscaping supplies were stored on the East Side of White
Bear Ave., I use to think. it made Maplewood look like a Dump. Several of my friends
would comment on that mess I don't mind the fact that they want to store current and
usable landscaping supplies and equipment there, but I do mind the traffic by my house
and the mess, If they want to store these items, access it via white Bear Ave. and I
suggest that the City of Maplewood inspect them yearly. Also the storage area should be
screened from all sides, including the west. when I sit on nay deck, I can see the
proposed storage area and it's not pretty.
Carol Guzzo
1876 East County Road C
Maplewood, MN 55109
post -1r Fax N(Ae 7671
Z iffTo0oo
CQ.mpt
FOX
Data
From
C*.
Phony #
Fax #
13 ._ ..._._.. .
TOTAL PAGE. 01 **
Attachment 7
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Bob Mogren, of Mogren Brothers, applied for a conditional use permit for outdoor
storage:
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located behind 2599 White Bear Avenue. The legal
description is:
SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, EXCEPT WEST 166.5 FEET OF NORTH 333
FEET & EXCEPT EAST 170 FEET OF NORTH 225 FEET; THE EAST 396.5 FEET OF
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 (SUBJECT TO ROAD &
EASEMENTS) OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On December 6, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
permit.
2. On December 27, 1999 the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the
hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
3. On June 12, 2000, the city council held a second public hearing. The city staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property Owners. The council gave everyone at the
hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described conditional
use permit based on the building and site plans. The city - approved this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with
the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
14
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into
the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the site /landscape plan date- stamped December 15, 1999, however, the applicant
shall revise the plan as follows: (the director of community development may approve minor
changes):
a. Tighten the tree spacing in both rows to 15 feet on center. As viewed straight on, the trees would
then be 7.5 feet apart.
b. The opening proposed for the White Bear Avenue access drive should be narrowed from the
proposed 70 feet to 20 feet.
c. The applicant should install wetland protection buffer signs at the steel -post barrier as code
requires. There should be at least three signs which prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling
or dumping within the buffer.
d. The gap in the trees behind 2599 White Bear Avenue should be filled in to be continuous.
e. The two gravel driveways shall consist of 1 %2 -inch clear rock.
2. The trees shall be planted and the rock approaches installed by August 12, 2000.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4.. The - applicant shall keep all parts of this storage yard on the BC -zoned portions of his property.
5. The applicant shall move all equipment, vehicles and materials at least 100 feet north of the midpoint
of the creek slope.
6. There shall be no noise - making, business activity conducted in the storage yard, or made by vehicles
entering or Leaving the storage yard, between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Saturday or all day
Sunday as required by code. During snow events, the applicant may store on the site but must use
White Bear Avenue for entering and exiting the site.
7. The applicant shall not store any inoperable or unlicensed vehicles on this site.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on June 12, 2000.
15
Attachment 8
12/26/99
We, the people around and near . the location of the propose snow removal
dumping site, would like Maplewood City Council NOT approve Bob
Mogren's request for the hauling and dumping of snow in our neighborhood.
We do not want or need truck traffic coming on or off County Rd. C., let
alone the noise and mess that is associated with that.
110j
f .
rf
r •
1
t
f
1
it
t
1. S.3v A
d Z: -
3 e C 0 dG
r a - c ,,) 7
16
Attachment 9
APO an.
April 3, 2000
City of Maplewood
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 1
Attention: Maplewood Star and City Council
Re: Property ID #1129 22 22 00416
I am respectfully requesting the City Council to reconsider my application for a
Conditional Use Permit for the Mogren Brother's property located South of the Regal Car
Wash.
I was out of town when my proposal was scheduled to be heard by the City Council. My
nephew Bruce Mogren, was scheduled to attend the meeting but was unaware that thepg
council meeting had been changed from the regularly scheduled time of 7:00 p.m. to 5:00
p m. As a result he missed the meeting and my interests were not represented. This was
an honest mistake and I now request an opportunity to personally present my plans for
the property.
Sincerely,
C " rte= _._
Robert C. Mogren
C: cfii,n C Manrzge,r
I v ac1e wl4 r1
17
MEMO
AGENDA REPORT
To: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager
From: Steve Lukin, Fire Chief
Subject: Award of Minitor III Pagers Bid
Date: June 6, 2000
AGENDA ITEM - I
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
INTRODUCTION
In the 2000 Budget, we originally were set to purchase MDT computers for our fire trucks and chief's
vehicles. After reviewing the status of the availability of progr information that would be
useful to the fire department, we determined that by putting this purchase off one year it would give us
more time to research the type of program that would best meet our needs.
At this time, we are in dire need of replacing the pagers that alert the firefighters of a call at their
station. The present Motorola Minitor II Pagers are no longer available and parts and service are
becoming more difficult by the day.
In the 2001 CIP, we were scheduled to receive 125 new Motorola Minitor III Pagers with programming
capabilities. The main reason these were set to be purchased in 2001 was due to their availability this
year. That . has changed. These Pagers can be available to us within 10 days. Based on need, I have
moved my 2000 Budget purchase to 2001 CIP and my 2001 CIP purchase to 2000 Budget.
RECOMMENDATION
The two bids received' for the purchase of 125 Motorola Minitor III Pagers are as follows (copies
attached)
Duluth /Superior Communications, Inc. $54,935
Ancom Communications $46,560
I recommend the council to accept Ancom Communication's bid for the purchase 'of 125 Motorola
Minitor III Pagers at a cost of $46,560.
c: City Clerk
r
ANCOM 1800 EAST CLIFF ROAD, SUITE 17A BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337
COMMUNICATIONS INC SALES 952 -808 -0033 SERVICE 952 - 808 -7699 FAX 952 - 808 -0034
TECHNICAL CENTER INC
DATE: 4/27/00
CUSTOMER: Chief Steve Lucan
Maplewood Fire Department
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
CONTACT: Chief Steve Lucan
PHONE: 651.770.4535
QUANTITY EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
Sales:. Dean R. Daninger
Phone: 763.755.3377
Fax: 763.755.4111
Quote Onlv
125 MINITOR III Alert Monitor
Stored Voice 1 Channel
VHF 150 -174 MHz Two Tone
Includes:
OTAL EQUIPMENT INVESTMENT
TAX @ 6.5- %
Shipping and Delivery
programming
GRAND TOTAL
E -MAIL: ancom @pclink.com WEBSITE: www.ancom.org
UNIT EXTENDED.
349.00 $43,625.00
fir - rv, wff.v. v v
2
100.00
0.00
46, 560.63
MO?`ORCLA
Authorized Two -Way
Radio Dealer
m IVI,4Y LUUU L41'IVt UULUIn /JUI'CnIUR I,UIVIMUIVII,HIIUIVJ IVU - LIOL F' L/L
Duluth/Superior Communications, Inc.
711 Hammond Ave. Superior, WI 54880
Tet: 715- 392 -2911 Fax; 715-392-2995
Confidential & .Proprietary Information For Intended Recipient Only!
April 21, 2000
Prepared four: Maplewood Fire Department
Attention: Chief Steve Lucan
RE: Minitor 1H Recommendation
QTY-ESCRInoN
UNIT EKTENDED
PRICE__ — PRICE
125 Motorola Minitor III VHF 1- Frequency, 2 -Tone
Sequential, Alert Monitor Receiver wNibra -page
and Stoned Voice. Features: Low Battery Alert,
Variable Volume Control, 2 -AAA NICad Batteries,
11 71) Single Unit Charger, Field Programmable,
One Year Parts and Labor Warranty.
125 Programming Of Minitor III w/Customer
Frequency and Tones.
125 - Subtotal
Shipping
Total
Friciag Valid for 30 Days
Plus Tax if Applicable
Payment Due Upon Receipt
Frepand By: Mark Smith
403.00 $50 : 375.00
35.00 $4,375.00
438.00 ;54
185.00
54t 03U0
Accepted By:
Date:
YOUR A UTHONZED MOTOWOZA SALESAND SERVICE CENTER"
FEATURES
Channel monitor capabilities
Compact styling
More rugged
than your
roughest day.
Synthesized receiver with 2 channel capability
Scan (priority or non - priority)
Extended battery life
Field programmable for frequency
and codes
4 individual calls and 2 group calls
per channel
Tone & vibrate alerting capabilities
with visual indication
Meets NFPA Standard 1221 3.113
Easily controlled while wearing
most types of gloves
Low battery alert
Complies with Military Standard
810E Procedure II For Rain
Field pro &rammable function
mode switch
Operates on 2 AAA batteries,
rechargeable or alkaline
Speaker /earphone jack
Note: Some features are field programmable
or are available on certain models only.
Now with Scanning, Vibrating
and Programming Options
AGENDA ITEM NO J
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Design Review
PROJECT: Sprint PCS Monopole
LOCATION: 2500 Hudson Place
DATE: June 2, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Wendy Metchnek, representing Sprint PCS, is proposing to install a 75 -foot -tall monopole for
telecommunications equipment. They want to install this monopole west of the existing parking
lot of Christ United Methodist Church at 2500 Hudson Place. (Refer to the maps and plans on
pages 8 -12 and the statements starting on page 13.) There also would be equipment boxes on
a pad near the base of the monopole and they would enclose the base area with a six - foot -tall
chain -link fence.
Requests
The applicant is requesting that the city approve:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a monopole and related equipment in an R -1 (single-
dwelling residential) zoning district.
2. The design and site plans.
BACKGROUND
On December 13, 1993, the city council approved a CUP for the church to expand and for an
existing pre - school day care center. This approval was subject to two conditions.
On January 13, 1997, the city council adopted the commercial use antenna and tower ordinance.
On May 22, 2000, the city council considered this request. After taking public testimony and
reviewing the proposal, the council tabled action on the proposal until June 12, 2000. The
representatives of Sprint agreed to this delay to allow them to review possibly moving the tower
site farther north on the property (toward Hudson Place).
DISCUSSION
The 1996 Federal Telecommunications Act does not allow cities to prohibit the installation of
telecommunications facilities and equipment. Because of this law, local governments may only
regulate, but may not prevent, the installation of monopoles or other telecommunications
facilities. As such, the city may only base their decision about this request (or any other similar
request) on land use and on health, safety and welfare concerns.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses all telecommunications systems. This
licensing requires that the proposed or new telecommunications equipment not interfere with
existing communications or electronics equipment. If there is interference, then the FCC requires
the telecommunications company to adjust or shut down the new equipment to correct the
situation. Maplewood must be careful to not limit or prohibit this tower (or any other tower)
because of electronic interference. That is up to the FCC to regulate and monitor.
As part of their site selection process, Sprint considered using several other structures in the
area for an antenna site but found that these did not meet their needs. These included the
Holiday Inn at 1 -94 and McKnight Road, the water tank on McKnight Road north of 1 -94 and the
existing monopole on the north side of I -94 in Landfall. Sprint also contacted 3M about using one
of their buildings for an antenna site but 3M denied their request.
At the May 1, 2000, planning commission meeting, the neighbors south of the church asked
Sprint and the church to move the proposed monopole farther north on the site toward I -94. City
staff, representatives of Sprint and the church met on the site on Tuesday, May 2, 2000, to
review this request. Working together we picked the proposed site for the monopole that is near
the northwest corner of the church parking lot. (See the site plans on pages 9 and 10.)
On May 24, 2000, city staff met with representatives of Sprint, the church and the neighborhood
to review the tower request and possibly moving the tower closer to Hudson Place. At this
meeting, Sprint notified city staff, the church and the neighbors that they did not want to again
change the tower location. As such, they want the city council to consider and act on the
proposed plans dated May 15, 2000. (Also see the letter from Sprint's attorney Gary Gandrud
starting on page 21.)
The city council should approve this request. This project meets the requirements of the
Maplewood tower ordinance and the criteria for a CUP. As proposed, the tower would be about
200 feet from the south property line of the site (the city code requires at least a 100 -foot setback
from a property used for residential purposes and a setback of at least 30 feet from a street right -
of -way). Much of the base area and the lower portion of the monopole would be screened by
existing trees. The applicant is proposing to add trees in three areas on the property to help
screen the base area from view from nearby homes. These planting areas include an area west
of the garage, on the north side of the proposed lease area and northeast of the existing church
building. (See the site plans on pages 10 and 11.) The site design, with the additional tree
planting, would be compatible with the adjacent church and parking lot.
It is important for the city council, when reviewing this or similar applications, to balance the
interests of the applicant, the property owner (the church), the neighbors and the city as a whole.
It is staffs opinion that moving the tower farther north (again) would not help to hide or screen it
from the neighbors on Brookview Drive. The proposed location maximizes the use of existing
trees on the church and neighbors properties and the church building to help screen the
proposed tower from the homes on three sides of the site. In addition, the proposed location
provides some screening of the site (especially the base area) from the north. Moving the tower
site farther north could make it more visible to the homes on Sterling Street and more visible
from the north. (Please see the letter from Virgil Gilbertson on page 24.) The proposed site
balances the interests of the church and Sprint in having a tower site on this property and the
concerns of all the neighbors who want the tower screened from all their views.
In addition, the city has approved similar monopole facilities at two other churches in Maplewood
that are near residential neighborhoods. These include Presentation Church on Kennard Street
and Trinity Baptist Church at 2220 Edgerton Street, just south of Highway 36. 1 am not aware of
any complaints about these monopoles since their owners installed them.
2
COMMISSION ACTIONS
On May 1, 2000, the planning commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit for
this proposal.
On May 9, 2000, the community design review board recommended approval of the proposal.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 24 and 25. This resolution approves a conditional use permit to
allow up to a 100- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment. This approval
is for the property at 2500 Hudson Place. The city bases this approval on the findings required
by the ordinance and is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plans dated May 15, 2000, as approved by the city. The
applicant shall locate the monopole and the necessary lease area near the northwest
corner of the church parking lot as noted on the site plan on page nine of this report. The
director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant or owner shall allow the co- location of other providers' telecommunications
equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions.
5. Any antenna that is not used for a year shall be deemed abandoned and may be required
to be removed.
6. The applicant or Sprint shall post a bond or other guarantee with the city to ensure proper
removal of the antenna and monopole and the restoration of the site.
B. Approve the site and design plans date - stamped May 15, 2000, for up to a 100 - foot -tall
telecommunications monopole and equipment to the property at 2500 Hudson Place. Approval
is based on the findings required by code and subject to the applicant doing the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city -has not issued permits for this project.
2. Before the city issues a building permit, city staff must approve a landscaping plan for the
property. This plan shall show the planting of a mix of Austrian Pine and Norway Pine trees
to the west of the existing garage, on the north side of the proposed lease area and
northeast of the existing church building. (These are the areas noted for additional tree
planting on the plans date - stamped May 15, 2000.) These trees are to help screen the
base area. These trees shall be at least 8 feet tall, balled and burlapped and shall be
planted in staggered rows as shown on the proposed plans.
3. The access drive between the tower lease area and the existing parking lot shall be paved
with bituminous.
91
4. If the landscaping or trees are not installed by the completion of the tower, the city shall
require the applicant to provide a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the
required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any
unfinished landscaping shall be completed within six weeks of occupancy.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
4
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
City staff surveyed the owners of the 43 properties within 350 feet of the proposed site. We
received 15 replies. 13 were against the proposal and two had no objections. (These responses
were to the applicant's original proposal. Since then, the applicant has revised the plans by moving
the monopole about 200 feet north and adding landscaping in three areas on the church property
to help screen the base area of the facility.)
Against
1. I do not want this built in what is my backyard - I pay too much in taxes and we are constantly
getting stuff shoved down our throats. Put it somewhere else. (Rowe - 179 Sterling Street)
2. Why not place this monopole west of Carver School. This would be away from houses and far
enough from the school. No one wants these towers close to their homes. (Gilbertson - 222
Sterling Street)
3. We would not be in favor of the installation of this facility - it will alter the appearance of what is
otherwise an attractive suburban setting. (Recchio - 2439 Brookview Drive)
4. We do not wish to have this monopole placed near our home. We think the Sprint Company
could find a commercial area for this telecommunication monopole. Placing this pole as far
away from homes as possible. I would like to receive information on the studies done,
confirming the safety of this monopole. To guarantee the health and welfare of our family,
down to our grandchildren. The children have a play area not far from the proposed monopole
structure. (Elizondo - 2447 Brookview Drive)
5. We oppose the building of this telecommunications monopole because:
1. It will reduce our home value
2. It is too close to our home
3. It will interfere with Our phone, TV, radio
4. The impact to the environment
5. The impact to our health
Anything happens due to building of this telecommunications monopole, especially our home
value and our health should be the responsibility of the city. Please consider this decision very
carefully. (Nguyen - 2455 Brookview Drive)
6. Do not think it is appropriate to put this in a residential area. This is being shoved down the
neighborhood's throat without a vote from the neighborhood. By the time we get this notice you
have already made up your mind to approve it as evidenced by the stakes already marking its
position. Why can't the pole be put in a commercial area like the one on the Cartiva lot (in
Landfall)? Why does it have to be in a neighborhood? It is ugly and it does lower property
values. Who wants to look out their window and see a monopole? (Edblorn - 2458 Brookview
Drive)
7. We are strongly opposed to the monopole being built in our area. It will have an impact on our
home values, the environment and possibly our health. Certainly no one wants one in their
backyard. They are unsightly. What a disappointment that the church cares so little for this
neighborhood that it sells us out for pieces of silver. (Ashley - 2466 Brookview Drive)
5
8. We do not want a monopole near our neighborhood as we did not want the water park. It
seems that these proposals always go through no matter the opposition. (Brosky - 2474
Brookview Drive)
9. If 2500 Hudson Place was your first choice, what were your second and third? Why is this
in a residential area and not out on the high side of 694 -494 and 94? What are we to
expect in the future when the 75 -foot pole is not high enough? It seems to me there are
plenty of other high locations that are not in someone's backyard! We already have a civil
defense siren which we accept. We get a water slide stuffed down our throats - which is
noisy before it has been used and the thought of the area . on getting rid of the deer that
devastate our yards was ignored, we have bow and arrow hunting instead of sharp
shooting as was deemed the best at a council meeting by the residents. Our voices are not
heard, but our taxes go up. I'm not looking forward to looking at. a 75' tower from my
kitchen window, where I spend a lot of time. (Kuhn - 2481 Brookview Drive)
10. 1 for one would not like to see a telecommunications monopole put up on the church
property. I know the church could use the income it would generate, but 20 some years
ago when we bought this house, the church asked us to agree to stop the sound barrier in
front of the church. Reason being to keep the church visible from the freeway. For that we
have to listen to the freeway noise. This time I will not support them in this effort. I can't
believe with all the wide -open space around the 94 and 694 intersection there is not a
better site. Did they try Evergreen in Woodbury? (Utgaard - 2496 Brookview Drive)
Also see the three letters on pages 17, 18 and 19 for additional comments.
A
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 5.2 acres
Existing land use: Church and child care center
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: 3M campus across Hudson Place and Interstate 94
South: Single dwellings on Brookview Court
West: Single dwellings on Crestview Court
East: Single dwellings across Sterling Street
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: C (church) and S (school)
Zoning: R -1 (Single dwelling residential)
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36 -606 requires a CUP for a communications tower in a residential zoning district. The
ordinance requires a maximum height of 75 feet, however, the height may be increased to 100 feet
if the tower is designed for the co- location of another provider's antenna.
Findings for CUP Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council must base approval of a CUP on nine standards for
approval. Refer to findings one through nine in the resolution on pages 25 and 26.
Application Date
The city received all the application materials for this request on March 31, 2000. State law
requires the city to take action on this request by May 29, 2000, unless the applicant agrees to a
time extension. The applicant's representatives agreed to a time extension to the June 12, 2000
council meeting at the May 22, 2000 city council meeting.
p:sec1- 28 /2500huds. mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Site Plan (Enlarged)
5. Tower Elevation - Looking North
6. Applicant's statement
7. Applicant's criteria approval statement
8. Statement from Nelsons (2431 Brookview Drive)
9. Statement from Helminick (190 Sterling Street North)
10. April 8, 2000 letter from Timothy Miller (2488 Brookview Drive)
11. June 1, 2000 letter from Gary Gandrud
12. June 2, 2000 letter from Virgil Gilbertson
13. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
14. Project Plans date - stamped May 15, 2000
7
Attachment 1
C/ '' Z twtvc.1 i cry r+. .. .
fA CAM AVE L
S.
ci 81 4/ l uA BRAND AV'...
AVE.
so
10. 0 00 :1
6 7th ST. r`i.h."""'0 .
NVY
E. 7th ST.:: 4•
V ,.s
AI
f = AVE. ..0060
0
p 00
s • .
E AW. •
n 4b .
I
E. Sth ST. . #
V
V. ' •i
FRED/ ONT +•
0 6
so- COY AVE. .. ° ERIN TAL E
20 cca
240 ,• . .
2630
66 ..
a .
i. rem
N a a
Lj I to
r-142,30 220 . Tommm
OlEw
MAYM LA.
IwES o. • ,.
NV •
t MER PITON R0. •
0
t •• 'N
N . •
LOCATION MAP Q
N
Attachment 2
g a 7 • i I0 -
f -EWE 3• -- P_5 1 •. : E 3 S 25' . - (o ' 3 4 (, - 164 . , " •
of i 8ibff+ I •x •:31 f
47 g~•` __ -• '•• • r •
lull'. ,/ f .
p `•` ' I d 3 Z 3.S
4?30 • .. : : •. „.Q 'V / f 'i
r ON P I • +. , =r _,' . a 2 ° t S
CE
IR 4f tG. d 251 0 11 7.1
114___
o• tle' tri i 210 '
1 O
i in421 Cl
ST U 1 208
ODST 1
H1 N _""' - L
3 ..• ' >- ;r ,24 / O N
1190 a Q
2431 r , 1W4plip%
O° K 1.180 2 '
lojlb
LOA
I O
179 y .;`
5 10 g 0
s
Z_S') f ' f3. is . 100 .
1453 27 f 1 • ; `4
2 ' 1 < / S 17 ' 3• 51
r f
as bo
0,
Z7 zi
a Cr
2 LAJ -
in
Sic
051 • , O as 5 90
c
03 /
ow A
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4
9 N
Attachment 3
0
J \ N the of the NW LZ1 /4 of Sec, i ! 1
H O NE corner of the
NW 1/4 of Sec. 1 `a SON PL 474.60
00.
DI TIONAL TREES -_. 65.00 --PROPOSE AD ---
Aproximate Vrly R/W line
Of Trunk Hwy. 12 obtaned
by MNDOT Strip Map
J0 00
89'1347 "W 301.19 _
Jrrw-- w- ----- - --ww- ww--- w-- . ww `
I
Sewer Easement Jv, dm
Gas
No 1d4a8a3 t
7 No. 1529317 dgE '
O '
D MONOPOLEA •00 PROPOSE ' 1
r
ROPOSED ADDITIONAL TRE ES 4
CIV - O j
CH
fir Exy{ ,/ (r a'
n
SED ADDITIONAL TREES - ' • " 0
PROPO V)
LAJt
Eaaefnsnt
42.03
Js
m
1 r .. .
SITE PLAN
Al
SCALE: 1 "= 50' -0"
GRAPHIC SCALE
b s ,ae eoo
w MT)
1 inah . 60 rc
SITE PLAN
o
4
N
Attachment 4
PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TREES
e 1,/N i
TI tf . , r _• 1 t / ~ y
SEE TREE PLANTING DETAIL
ON SHEET A3, MULCH AND
AND EDGE AREA SURROUNDING
PROPOSED TREE PLANTINGS . _ /-
AUSTRIAN AND NORWAY PINE
SHALL BE 8' -0' MIN (TYP) % "/ ! `•
2 6
i
CABLE BRIDGE BY
1 SPRINT PCS
15 bi N - ?
EQUIPMENT -
PLATFORM + -.j
SEE TREE PLANTING DETAIL
ON SHEET A3. MULCH AND
AND EDGE AREA SURROUNDING
o
PROPOSED TREE .PLANTINGS
z J .r AUSTRIAN AND NORWAY PINE
J •~ SHALL BE 8' -0' MIN (TYP)
IJ
6' -0" FENCE
W/O BARB WIRE Point A , 75' MONOPOLE (EXPANDABLE TO 100' -0l
20.00 s >"-'' (BY OTHERS) (ANTENNAS NOT SHOWN
20.00-
ti ' FOR CLARITY, SEE 2/A2 FOR ANTENNA PLAN)
N81•39 r -• ` 0
EDGE OF 30' -0" x
30' -0" LEASE AREA ! —- °•
o GATE '
cn 34.92
i
pARKING LOT
I I !
1 I 1
r
f '
SITE PLAN
ENLARGED)S-- /3 -a0
Attachment 5
TOWER ELEVATION
12
4
N
T—ARM ANTENNA
MOUNT (TYP)
11 fl n n
ELEVATION. OF SPRI PCS " " '"
ANTENNAS w• va x
U 1.! u U
Jo IPHASE1BUILD -OUT , MICROFLECT TRI- BRACKET
1'
ANTENNA (TYP.) I
ASSEMBLY
1
1
I
t
I
1
f
1
I
r
1
I
r
i
1
I
I
I
r
1
I
1
1
PROPOSED 75' -0`
MONOPOLE BY OTHERS
1
I
1
STS N 2 STS 1 I
ICE BRIDGE
BY SPRINT PCS
I
r
i I PROPOSED
FOUNDATION
i I BY OTHERS
6' -0" CHAIN LINK
S I FENCE W/0 BARB WIRE
EQUIPMENT
CONCRETE PIER PLATFORM
TMP)
3" DEEP COMPACTED
AGGREGATE SURFACING OVER T O W E R ELEVATIONGROUNDSTABILIZATIONFABRIC1
LOOKING NORTH
TOWER ELEVATION
12
4
N
05,12/2000 11 6122536363 FOURSCORE PAGE 02
Attachment 6
OPENING STATEMENT
In its pursuit of providing the highest quality digital wireless se c,- .Sprint ..PtC$
Sprint ") proposes to construct a wireless conunumcation facility locate at '5
Hudson Place, Maplewood, MN, within a Residential Zoning District. Sprint will be
leasing a 30' x 30' parcel of land on the subject parcel. The entire wireless facility will
be located within the leased parcel. The facility will include a 75 -Foot monopole
structure and equipment cabinets. Sprint is seeking approval (at the City's request) of a
Conditional Use Permit for up to a l 00 -foot structure to allow for another provider to co-
locate at a future date without requiring another CUP application and public hearing,
Spit has agreed to build its monopole -Mth the structural support necessary to support a
25 -foot additio)a to the monopole and antennas regardless of whether the Conditional Use
Permit is approved up to 75 feet (the height of the tower) or up to 100 feet. The facility
will be entirely enclosed by a 6' chain link fence.
As part of Sprint's ongoing development and improvement of its wireless
network, system engm' cers b avc identified the need for a new Facility to serve the area
surrounding the intersection of highways 94 and 694. The required location for the new
facility was determined by computer modeling that evaluates ,population density,
topography and current antenna system capacity. The potential location area is known as
the "Search Ring" This Search Ring represents the area in which a facility must be
located to allow it to function as an integral unit in the antenna S'd system. ,Ater a
thorough search of the ring the site located at 2500 Hudson Place was found to be the
most appropriate based on technological, practical and aesthetic concerns. while
iocafimg on the rooftop of the nearby 3M building would have been an ideal site,
unfortunately, due to 3 M's concern about interference with their technical research and
development, we were unable to secure a lease at that location.
In addition to the technical requirements of the facilities' location, Sprint selects
the location that meets the requirements of the local zon'ng code. Pursuant to section 36-
600 (5)(b)) of the Maplewood Zoning Ordinance, the location of this facility on church
property is a preferred primary land use. 'these two factors make the church candidate
the most appropriate choice, based on the constraints of locating within the Search Ring.
The proposed facility will not cause harm to the public health, safety, morals or
general welfare. As a condition of its license from the FCC, Sprint's technology does not
cause interference with any other form of communication, whether public or private. To
the contrary, Sprint's technology provides vital communications in emergency situations
and will be commonly used by local residents and emergency personnel to protect the
general public's health, safety and welfare.
Wireless telephone technology provides many benefits to the communities it
serves. These services include, but are not limited to, the following:
911 program allowing motorists to summon aid and report dangerous situations.
13
05/12/2000 11:37 6122536363 FOURSCORE PAGE . .
Support for emergency serviCes by providing wireless communications to
paramedics, firefighters, and law enforcement agencies.
A backup system to the land -line system in the event of a natural or man -made
disaster.
Communication capabilities in remote areas, enhancing the safety of travelers by
allowing immediate access to emergency assistance.
Support for the busy lives of people in the area reducing stress and increas
productivity.
Ing
Site ,Analysis and History
During Sprint's site selection process it first determines what the requirements are
from the governing municipality. Once informed, the acquisition specialists search the
area designated by the engm' eers at Sprint. In the City of Maplewood church property is
a preferred candidate for Conditional Use Pen - nits. To utilize church property Sprint is
proposing to utilize the grounds of Christ United Methodist Church located at 2500
Hudson place.
In Sprint's search for an acceptable location in the area surrounding the
intersection Highways 94 and 694, only a few potential sites were discovered. An
existing AT &T tower is located near the proposed site. This tower, however is outside
the Search Ring and did not provide the coverage needed by the Sprint engineers for the
new facility. The coverage is essential to the operation of the new facility within the
antenna grid system. There is a Holiday Inn located at 2201 Burns Avenue, in St. Paul
which was also evaluated but again, was outside the Search Ring and did not p rovide
adequate coverage. Therefore, to meet the coverage and capacity needs of the
surrounding area, the best feasible location for the facility is on the church property at
2500 Hudson Place.
Since our application; was filed on March 31, 2000, we have revised the site
location twice. In response to neighbouring residents' concerns regardijag the proximity of
the proposed site to their homes, Spuritt, the Landowner and the City first agreed on a. site
which was 100 feet further North than the initial proposed site. At the May l Planning
Commission meeting, the neighbors requested that the site be moved eves, further North
by approximately an additional 100 feet. Sprint complied with this request as it met their
engineering requirements and the Landowner agreed to the relocation. The third location
was then recommended for approval at the May 9 Community Design Review Board
meeting. Sprint has revised the site plans accordingly. In addition, to minimize the
visibility of the monopole, Sprint has agreed to plant trees, in the species, number, size
and location requested by the City, which are reflected in the most recent drawings.
Finally, at the request of the Con unity Design Review Board and/or neighbouring
residents, Sprint has revised its initial plan to remove the one foot high barb wire from
the top of the fence.
14
Attachment 7
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
The Conditional Use will conform to the applicable regulations of Residential Districts.
Pursuant to the Maplewood Zoning Ordinance, Sections 36 -66 (b)(3) and 36 -606, the
proposed use requires a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed monopole will be built to
conform to all Maplewood Zoning Ordinance provisions, including the regulations
concerning height, setbacks, and landscaping. The Conditional Use will be in harmon
with the spirit. and intent of the Maplewood Zoning Ordinance. Wireless telephones
provide an alternate communication system which has repeatedly proven its effectiveness
in emergency situations and is commonly being utilized by police and fire departments to
protect the general public's health, safety and welfare. Therefore, the granting of the
Conditional Use will be in conformance with the general and specific purposes imposed by
the City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
Due to the minimal size of the leased parcel and the nature of the surrounding uses, there
will be little impact on the character of the locality, with no adverse effect on existing or
future. development in the area. This is also supported by section 36 -600 (5)(b) of the
Ordinance which designates this location as a preferred land use.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
The proposed facility consists of a monopole structure that has very little aesthetic impact
on the surrounding area. This structure is similar to a light standard. The proposed
facility will consist of a monopole antenna structure not to exceed 75 feet and
accompanying unstaffed equipment cabinets. The entire facility will be located within a
30830 parcel of land. With such a small footprint and its location on church property, a
preferred primary land use area (see section 36 -600 (5)(b)), this facility will have little
impact on the use and enjoyment of property in the immediate vicinity, nor will there be an
adverse effect on property values within the neighborhood. To the contrary, enhanced
wireless communications will have a positive influence on the development of this area.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor,
fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water run -off, vibration, general, unsighthness,
electrical interference or other nuisances.
Due to the diminutive size of the facility, it will not interfere with an adequate supply of
light and air to adjacent property, increase the danger of fire, nor will it substantially
diminish or impair the enjoyment or aesthetics of the neighborhood. The proposed facility
15
will not injure the public health, safety, morals or general welfare. Wireless technology
does not interfere with any other form of communication, whether public or private. To
the contrary, wireless technology provides vital communications in emergency situations
and will commonly be used by local residents and emergency personnel to protect the
general public's health, safety and welfare.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
Sprint's PCS facilities are unstaffed and entirely self - monitored. Therefore, there will be
no impact on the existing traffic nor will there be any traffic hazards generated.
Maintenance personnel will visit the facility at most once a month. Access will be provided
via existing entrances. Thus the safety and efficiency of public streets and highways will be
maintained.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, `n " fm structures, water and sewer systems, schools, and
parks.
The only utilities necessary for this facility are telephone and electricity, both of which are
readily available. Because the facility is unstaffed, there will be no impact to the existing
traffic patterns nor will there be any need for additional access roads. No drainage,
sanitation, refuse removal, parks, library, or school services will be necessary for this
facility. Existing police and fire protection are more than adequate to provide security for
the facility.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
As stated above, existing police and fire protection are more than adequate to provide
security for the facility. Therefore, there will be to additional requirements at public cost
for public facilities and services.
8. The use would maxinuze the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development des*gn.
Due to the fact that Sprint PCS has been sensitive in selecting a site that will minimize the
impact on the surrounding property, their facility will be compatible with the existing
environment and will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of any natural, scenic,
or historic feature of significant importance.
9. The use would cause ' ' adverse environmental effects.
Again, because of the facilities small size, it will not injure the public health or safety and
will pose little, if any, adverse environmental concerns.
16
Attachment 8
We oppose the above conditional use permit for Sprint's PCS Telecommunication Monopole. We feel it does impact the
character of the residential. neighborhood surrounding the :Christ United Methodist Church property site. There is nothing
higher than a two -story dwelling anywhere in this area. Consequently, a 75 foot tower or "monopole" would be out of place
and unpleasant aesthetically, as well as having a definite effect on property values in the area. We are sure that Sprint would
like to believe this structure would have no threat to public health, but we do not believe they really know at this point.
Wireless technology is still relatively new enough that long term effects on health and environment cannot really be proven one
way or the other. This neighborhood was intended to be residential use and the taxpayers of the surrounding properties bought
into this community in good faith that that is what it would remain. We believe the church may have seen this offer as an
answer to financial concerns they are experiencing as a congregation. However, they must remember that as our neighbor, if
it is not good for the entire area as a whole, it should be a consideration for.them to rethink their position and motives for
agreeing to the proposal. Their building not only houses a congregation part - time but also houses a 4 day per week Nursery
School for pre-school children on the property. We do not believe the site is necessarily compatible. If the area to be served
reaches from our area to 1 -94 and 1-694, there must be better commercial or public grounds that could be chosen for this use.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this issue. Jacque A. & Diane K. Nelson
JACQUE. & DIANE NELSON
Sr BAUl. MINNESOTAX119
4s)- 73) --900
17
1
Attachment 9
Sprint PCS Telecommunication Monopole Request:
We do not approve of a conditionally use permit for Sprint PCS. We do not
agree with Sprints statement that this so called small footprint, which is 30 30'
with a enclosed 8' chain link fence topped with one foot high barb wire, plus 75'
pole with antennas will not in anyway have little impact on the enjoyment of a
wildlife type property. Nor adversely effect property values within the
neighborhood. What proof or guarantee do we have that this statement is true.
Especially referring to property values. In Sprints opening statement, one of the
benefits we would receive is, and 1 quote. Support for the busy lives of people in
the area reducing stress and increasing productivity. Sprint must be talking about
the 3M people, and 3M said they don't want the facility on their'property, nor do
we want it near ours. Give us a break, I'am 66 years old, and lived in this area for
24 years.l don't want or need - to - look at tower the sun sets in the
west..
In Sprints site analysis they state that AT &T has an existing tower but outside
the search area. What is the size of this search area? There is a lot of open land
near 94 & 694. My other question would be, does each wireless company put up
tower for service coverage, rather then share facilities. Sprint also states the
facility will not injure the public health. Is there any radiated energy coming off
these towers, if so ,what is the peak power energy output and range ?.
THANK YO d
N &JUDY HELMINICK
190 Sterling ST N.
MAPLEWOOD
651 -738 -0110
W
Kenneth Roberts, Associate Planner
Office of Community Development, City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood MN 55109 -2797
April 8, 2000
Re: Sprint PCS Telecommunications Monopole - 2500 Hudson Place
This letter represents our objection to the proposed installation near our home of a PCS Cellular
Communications Tower by Sprint. Please find herein our comments and concerns.
In reviewing the Opening Statement and other materials included with the Neighborhood Survey sent to
us by your office, we find that we have a couple of sincere reservations about the proposed installation
which remain unaddressed.
Most notably, we are concerned that this communications transmission facility might indeed interfere
with other communications which we use or depend upon. The Opening Statement attempts to address
this issue with the sentence:
As a condition of its license from the FCC, Sprint's technology does not cause interference with any
other form of communication, whether public or private.'
Frankly, this seems a weak and ineffective statement. Rather that a simple declarative, to whit: "Sprint
guarantees that this facility will in no way interefere with any of your communications.", the sentence in
the Opening Statments quoted above seems to more circle the issue than to address it head on. That
fact, coupled with the fact that 3M apparently does not regard that sentence as sufficient assurance for
themselves, leaves us with a suspicion that this facility might in fact cause communications problems
for us.
One specific communication form we are concerned about is computer wireless networking. We have
and depend upon a computer network in our home for both personal and business use. While not yet
deployed, we have been planning to expand this network through the use of wireless networking
technology. We are concerned that the Sprint PCS monopole could interfere with that.
19
If it were possible to get a direct statement from Sprint to us stating that they will interefere with NONE
of our communications - telephone, television, radio, computer, etc - and that Sprint would guarantee
remedy in the event of such interference, we would withdraw our objection.
Thanks for taking the time to both inform us and listen to our feedback.
Sincerely,
M
1
r •
Donna & Tim Miller
20
C 0 P Y FAEGRE & BENSON LLP
2200 NORWEST CENTER, 90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 - 3901
TELEPHONE 612-336-3000
FACSIMILE 612- 336 -3026
Attachment 11
COPY
GARY L. GANDRUD
GGandrud @faegre.com
612/336 -3332
June 1, 2000
Mayor Robert Cardinal, City Council Members, and
Mr. Michael McGuire, City Manager
GLG
JUN 0 2 7,000
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109 -2702
Re: Sprint PCS Application for a Conditional Use Permit at 2500 Hudson Place
Dear Mayor Cardinal, Mr. McGuire, and City Council Members:
We are legal counsel for Sprint PCS ( "Sprint "). Sprint is building a nationwide Personal
Communications Services ( "PCS ") network across the United States and does business in
Minnesota. It seeks to construct a 75 foot telecommunication monopole (capable of being
extended 25 feet) and base station at Christ Methodist United Church, 2500 Hudson Place
Church Site "). In 1995, Sprint was granted a license by the FCC that provides that within five
years of the license's issue, Sprint Spectrum must be able to provide its PCS service to thirty
three percent (33 %) of the population in the Minneapolis -St. Paul MTA. In conformity with its
FCC license, Sprint is actively building and expanding its PCS network in Minnesota. In order
to meet its obligation to provide PCS service at the earliest possible date, Sprint is acquiring
interests in sites for facilities and is applying for, and obtaining local governmental approvals to
construct the necessary facilities. Sprint is now responding to increased customer demand in
Maplewood. Sprint's success in providing effective service to PCS telephone users is
accomplishing the federal government's purpose in issuing PCS wireless broadcast licenses and
in passing the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
On March 31, 2000, Sprint submitted to the City a conditional use permit application for
the construction of its monopole at the Church Site which complied with the Maplewood Code.
Sprint then revised its site plans per the request of City Planner Ken Roberts and City Staff to
address complaints received by the City from residents stating that the site was too close to their
properties. On April 26, 2000, representatives from Sprint held a community meeting and
addressed concerns and questions from the neighbors of the church. Sprint had changed the
original site plans by this meeting, moving the proposed facility 75 -100 feet to the North.
On May 1, 2000, the Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council
based upon the City Staff report and Sprint's application, with the condition that the monopole
be relocated farther north to further alleviate the concerns of the neighbors to the south. In
response to the neighbor's concerns and pursuant to the requests of the City of Maplewood,
Sprint revised its site plan a third time and agreed to move the pole to the North, approximately
50 feet, along the Church Site's Western property line to better shield the view of the pole from
Minneapolis Denver Des Moines London Frankfurt
21
Mayor Robert Cardinal
Page 2
the neighbors to the South. The site is directly Southwest of a 30 -40 foot evergreen tree and is
shielded to the West by a 60 -foot cottonwood tree. Additional trees were included in the site
plan to shield the site from the South and East. This is the current proposed location that is to be
decided by the City Council. This location will be recommended by Maplewood City Staff and
approved by the Planning Commission.
At the May-22, 2000 City Council meeting, Sprint requested approval of a conditional
use permit to construct the proposed telecommunications facility pursuant to the City of
Maplewood Zoning Ordinance. Although all requirements for a conditional use permit had been
met, concerns voiced from neighbors as to the location of the proposed telecommunications
facility prompted the City Council to make a motion to table Sprint's conditional use permit
request until the next City Council meeting on June 12, 2000 in order to inform the neighbors as
to the location of the proposed telecommunications facility. Sprint agreed to table their
application until the June 12 City Council meeting in order to inform the neighbors as to the
location of the telecommunications facility, which was done at a May 24, 2000 neighborhood
meeting.
The City Council will vote on Sprint's application for a conditional use permit to
construct a 75 -foot monopole at the Church Property on June 12, 2000. The City Staff will
recommend that Sprint build the base to accommodate a 100 -foot monopole, but only build a 75-
foot pole at this time that is capable of being extended another 25 feet.
Sprint has cooperated with the City Planner, City Staff, and the concerns of the neighbors
throughout this whole process and has adjusted its original site plan, which fully complied with
the Maplewood City Code, two times in order to meet the City's and neighbors concerns. The
initial application and site location met every element of the Maplewood City Code and
conditional use permit application regarding the placement and construction of
telecommunications facilities. The City Planner confirmed this at each neighborhood meeting
and during presentations to both the Planning Commission and City Council. Each subsequent
location has also been in conformity with all requirements. The current location and conditional
use permit application comply in every way with the Maplewood City Ordinance.
Sprint has gone well beyond what is called for in meeting the needs of the Citv and its
residents. Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, counties and municipalities may not take
actions that prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting PCS antennas. 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7).
Because Sprint's application complies with the Maplewood City Code and Sprint has cooperated
with the City in every way possible, we believe that the City Council must uphold the letter and
spirit of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 by voting in favor of Sprint's application.
22
Mayor Robert Cardinal
Page 3
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Very truly yours,
FAEGRE & BENSON LLP
Gary L. Gandrud
GLG:har f
cc: Ken Roberts, City Planner (to include this letter in City Council submittal)
Melinda Coleman, Community Development Director
M 1:628597.03
23
Attachment 12
Virgil C. Gilbertson
222 North Sterling
Maplewood, NE'%4 55119
June 2, 2000 R FE V LF 0
J u N n z 2000
Melinda Coleman
Maplewood City Hall
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Ms. Coleman:
This is in regard to the Sprint tower being placed on the church property at Hudson
Place and Sterling. Street. We have no problem with the tower being placed on the church
property, if it is not placed fifty feet closer to Hudson Place than was proposed at the last
public hearing. The ideal place would be behind the church half way between the two
proposed locations. This pole is an eyesore on any location it is placed, and we request that
the pole not be moved closer to Hudson Place. From our living room on Sterling Street, we
now have a beautiful view of the church yard, 3M buildings and west almost to McKnight
Road.
I have worked with councils for thirty-one years, ten as Street Overseer and twenty-
one as a police officer, the last five years being Chief of Police. I realize the Council wants
to place this pole to everyone's satisfaction and that the Council cannot please everyone, but
to place this pole any closer to Hudson Place would really be an eyesore. It is my
understanding that the church is being paid a fair amount of money for allowing this pole to
be placed on their property, so I would think they could also be flexible in this matter.
Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
Virgil C. Gilbertson
24
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
Attachment =13
WHEREAS, Ms. Wendy Metchnek, representing Sprint PCS, applied for a conditional use
permit to install up to a 100- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2500 Hudson Place. The legal description is:
All that part of the East '/ of the NW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 28, Range 22, described as
follows:
Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of Section 1, Township 28, Range 22, thence Westerly
along the North line of said Section 1, a distance of 474.9 feet to a point, thence Southwesterly
by deflection angle of 60 48' to the left, a distance of 460.39 feet to a point; thence
Southeasterly by a deflection angle of 110 54' to the left, a distance of 711.55 feet to a point on
the North -South Quarter line of said Section 1; thence Northerly along said North -South
Quarter line by a deflection angle of 98 50' to the left, a distance of 505.13 feet to the point of
beginning. Subject to Highway 12 right -of -way and Great Lakes Pipeline easement.
In Section 1, Township 28, Range 22 in Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 01- 28 -22 -21 -0001)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On May 1, 2000, the planning commission recommended approval of this request.
2. The city council held a public hearing on May 22, 2000. City staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
3. On June 12, 2000, the city council again considered this request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
25
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks. 1
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plans dated May 15 2000, as approved by the city. The
director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant or owner shall allow the collocation of other providers' telecommunications
equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions.
5. Any antenna that is not used for a year shall be deemed abandoned and may be required
to be removed.
6. The applicant or Sprint shall post a bond or other guarantee with the city to ensure proper
removal of the antenna and monopole and the restoration of the site.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 2000.
26
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, MAY 1 2000
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. Sprint PCS Telecommunications Monopole Conditional Use Permit (2500 Hudson Place)
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts said the correct street
is Hudson Place. Commissioner Trippler asked if it was staff's interpretation, based on the 1996
telecommunications act or a ruling that the city was involved in, that the applicant does not have
to demonstrate a need for this tower. Mr. Roberts conceded that this was conceivable but not
likely. He said other avenues were checked for antenna location, including 3M, the McKnight
water tower and Holiday Inn, but these sites did not meet Sprint's needs. Commissioner Trippler
asked if Sprint specifically required a pole and how they showed this requisite. Mr. Roberts said
the applicant only stated that they needed an "antenna facility in this location." He said the
copies of reports from Sprint's field engineers indicated that the other sites would not be
adequate. Commissioner Trippler felt the applicant wanted a pole in this neighborhood and,
after looking at various sites, chose this one. He didn't feel that this told him how they arrived at
the decision that there was a need for the monopole at this Location.
Commissioner Frost asked what options the planning commission and the city council have,
based on the 1996 law and Maplewood's ordinance. Mr. Roberts said there were "very few, if
any" options. Commissioner Pearson asked about the failure rate of towers in the event of
storms, etc. Melinda Coleman, director of community development, said the only incident she
heard of was during Hurricane Andrew one tower "crinkled" a small amount.
Commissioner Ledvina asked about collocation. Mr. Roberts said Sprint determined that there
was not a pole in this vicinity that would meet their needs. He pointed out that these installations
were very expensive and didn't think a company would incur that expense if it wasn't necessary.
Commissioner Trippler wondered about church property as a preferred candidate for these
conditional use permits in relation to other sites. Mr. Roberts said the #1 preferred site is
industrial /commercial.
Commissioner Mueller questioned the possibility of these towers causing health problems for
nearby residents or interfering with other wireless technology. Mr. Roberts answered that he
has not seen any news publications that would indicate a health - related issue. He said that 3M
and U.S. West did some testing, in relation to a request a few years ago for a tower by the 3M
property, and found no interference. Mr. Roberts felt that 3M did not want the tower on their site
because they did not need the revenue nor want the security issues.
Brian Barrett was present representing Sprint PCS. He said their first choices for antenna
location on existing structures in the area did not fill the requirements of their engineers.
According to Mr. Barrett, they are building a 75 -foot tower with a capability to reach 100 feet to
allow for collocation. This is at the request of Mr. Roberts. The monopole will not be lit, will not
emit any noise or vibrations, and will be covered by a mature growth of trees. Mr. Barrett said
there will be additional plantings to screen the equipment.
Commissioner Trippler asked Mr. Barrett for his opinion on the economic impact if such a tower
was placed in his neighborhood. Commissioner Rossbach felt questions about whether a 30-
foot tree would hide a 75 -foot tower and economic impact were inappropriate. Commissioner
Trippler responded that one of the criteria for conditional use permit approval was that the use
would not deteriorate property values. Mr. Rossbach said no reports indicate that these towers
diminish "property values anywhere across the country." Ms. Coleman referred to the previous
tower proposal at another location, about which Maplewood was taken to court, and said
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 05 -01 -00
testimony was given by a real estate appraiser who felt the property" would be impacted
negatively by the tower." This statement was struck by the judge who determined that it was
inappropriate for the city to make findings based on this. Mr. Trippler asked if it was
inappropriate to question 2, 3 4 8 and 9 of the conditional use permit criteria. He felt it was
useless to have the hearings for a monopole if nothing could be .done. Ms. Coleman believed
that this was basically what the commission is required to do based on what the federal and
district courts have indicated. Ms. Coleman said that some of these issues are very complex
and many times county and state courts and federal laws impact and supersede the city's rights.
Jean Ashley, 2466 Brookview Drive, described her neighborhood. She said they are requesting
two things: 1) move the monopole as far north as possible on the site, and 2) keep the
monopole at the 70 feet as originally stated in the letter to the residents. Ms. Ashley felt
describing the pole as "diminutive" was a misnomer because "this will be the largest facility of
poles on a church in Maplewood." She referred to an antenna located at another church that
had "two hummers" and contended that they "do hum." She said this pole will have "three
hummers."
Commissioner Rossbach asked Ms. Ashley if she had considered the possibility of other poles
being placed in this vicinity, even on this same site. Ms. Ashely said they have talked about this
and decided there was no other site available and it was unlikely that the church would allow
another pole. Mr. Rossbach pointed out that people have "complained vehemently" at every
location. He thought Ms. Ashley's requests were "very reasonable." Ms. Ashley showed
pictures of various monopoles. Mr. Barrett commented that Sprint's equipment does not hum.
Robert Schlenz, a registered professional engineer and employee of 3M, said he came to speak
about the impact that this facility could possibly have on their equipment. He was present as a
representative of 3M. He said their interest had to do with the "size signal" that reaches 3M
equipment from the telecommunication transmitters. Mr. Schlenz was concerned that, if this
monopole is constructed as planned, 3M be notified of any changes so they can take necessary
steps to protect their laboratories. He said they declined to have this tower located on their
property because of its closeness signal strengths get smaller as the equipment is located
further away. According to Mr. Schlenz, these towers emit approximately a 1900 megaherz
signal. If this tower is moved further north on the site, 3M would like to know the amount of
power that is going to be transmitted, the kind of antenna, and the modulation that is involved.
Mr. Schlenz said the way the antennas were aimed was more crucial than the placement of the
pole on the site. Mr. Barrett noted that 3M is actually one of the areas that is requesting this
facility.
Terry Degraw, chairman of the board of trustees at Christ United Methodist Church, said he has
been working on the lease agreement. He said the humming sound comes from a fan unit or air
conditioning unit that is used to cool the electrical load that runs the antenna. Mr. Degraw
favored moving the antenna to the north. He said he was "kind of shocked" to find out that the
tower could go 100- feet -high and the lease agreement was for 75 feet.
Commissioner Frost asked Mr. Barrett's opinion about moving the pole further north on the site.
Mr. Barrett said it made no difference to them. Mr. Roberts was concerned that moving the
pole 30 feet from the northern property line would make it more visible from the houses to the
northeast of the church. He said the location choice was picked in order to increase the
distance from the homes on Brookview, as well as working with the trees in the area and using
the church building as a screen for the Sterling Street homes. Commissioner Thompson thought
the community design review board "would have an obligation to be as thoughtful" with
shrubbery, etc. Various options for placement of the monopole on the church property were
discussed.
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 05 -01 -00
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit to allow up to a 75 -foot-
tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment. This approval is for the property at
2500 Hudson Place. The city bases this approval on the findings required by the ordinance
and is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plans dated April 26, 2000, with the following
changes .to the location of the pole: the pole shall be located as far north on the property
as possible, still being functional for Sprint's uses for communications and incorporating
the existing trees and the church property by the northwest corner of their parking lot to
help hide the pole. Sprint should still look at installing additional trees and shrubs, placed
to block the view as much as possible of the pole from the houses on Sterling Avenue.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Commissioner Pearson seconded.
Commissioner Ledvina asked if there was a concern about collocation because the motion is to
reduce the height of the pole. Commissioner Rossbach had no objection to collocation as long
as it could be done with a 75 -foot monopole. Mr. Rossbach commended the area residents for
their ability to "pull its thoughts together into something cohesive" instead of just appearing at the
planning commission meeting to object to the monopole. Commissioner Frost assumed that 3M
and Sprint would get together to work out the technical specifications of the installation.
Mr. Barrett said that typically another carrier can collocate on a 75 -foot pole. A pole has to be
designed specifically to extend beyond 75 feet and the size of the foundation would need to be
increased. There was discussion about the need for another tower in this area and whether the
tower should be built with the capability of extending to 100 feet to allow for more collocation.
Staff confirmed that, if the monopole was designed so that it could go up to 100 feet but only
approved for 75 feet at this time, additional city approval would be needed to allow use of the
100 -foot tower.
Commissioner Ledvina made a friendly amendment to include:
4. The applicant or owner shall allow the co- location of other providers' telecommunications
equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions.
Mr. Roberts pointed out that this item did not address height, only co- location. Chairperson
Fischer said this would only be allowed within the 75 -foot limit. Commissioner Rossbach
accepted the amendment. Commissioner Frost clarified that the motion was that the facility be
designed to be able to go to 100 feet, but only currently approve it for 75 feet. If it does go
higher than 75 feet, another public hearing will be required.
Commissioner Rossbach asked that the minutes of this meeting reflect that the intent was that
the monopole would not be raised to 100 feet unless the neighborhood thought this was the best
choice at the time. This was not a part of the motion but only thoughts of some commissioners.
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 05 -01 -00
The motion passed.
Ayes — Fischer, Frost, Ledvina, Mueller,
Pearson, Rossvach, Thompson
Nays — Trippler
Commissioner Trippler stated that he voted against this application because he saw no evidence
to show that "this request would not violate Conditions 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9 of this conditional use
permit resolution."
Commissioner Mueller made a motion that the Planning Commission recommend to the city of
Maplewood that they not submit to the commission any further requests for siting any further
monopoles since the commission. apparently has no authority to approve or disapprove the
request. He said this was a total waste of the commissioners' time. Commissioner Rossbach
noted that conditional use permits allow uses with conditions but do not allow the commission to
stop things from happening.
The motion died because there was no second.
TE OF THE COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD, •.MINUTES .
1830 COUNTY ROAD, B EAST, MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA
MAY g, 2000 :. - =
VI. DESIGN REVIEW
A. Sprint PCS Monopole, 2500 Hudson Place -
resented the staff report. Chair erson Ledvina asked, with theSecretaryTomEkstrandp -P - ^
revised location of the pole, if there was a concern for the residents to the west. Mr. Ekstrand
said the trees were quite thick on that side. Since the homes ih'this area are at a lower ;
elevation, ground screening would not be a benefit. Mr. Ekstrand said this installation is a 30 ..:
x 30, fenced -in site.with a monopole and ground equipment .
representative of Sprint's consultant group, reviewed the staff report and hadDavidHuihui, a represe p 9 P -
no q uestions or concerns about the conditions. A couple of the boardmembers expressed
concern about the barbed wire proposed for the top of the fence. Mr. Huihui maintained that
the barbed wire served a security function and it was "pretty much a standard thing on all of
the height of the fence has been shortened to six feet, this was ;the compounds. Because h g - . -
even more of a consideration. Staff suggested that an angled bare wire at the top of the. ;
chainlink fence might make the barrier sufficiently difficult to cross. Various options were
discussed by staff and the board.
an of the board of trustees at Christ United Methodist Church, hadTerryDeGraw, chairman _
similar concerns about the barbed -wire fence. He viewed ten different monopole sites and
only two had fences. Mr. DeGraw was "led to believe" that the barbed wire could possibly be
dropped. ed Secrets Ekstrand reminded the board that conditional use permits are reviewedSecretary
after one Year. If there was just cause, the applicant could choose to add the barbed wire
after this year review. He also suggested that the recommendation could be worded such
that the applicant could add the barbed wire if trespassing or vandalism occurred before thePP -
one-year time. Boardmember LaCasse strongly recommended an angled top wire instead of
the barbed wire.
Boardmember Johnson moved. the Community Design Review Board
plans date-stamped April 26; 2000, for up to a 100 - foot -tallB. Approve the site and design p p P
telecommunications monopole and equipment to the property at 2500 Hudson Place.
I i based on the findings required b code and subject to the applicant doing theApprovalsgqY - ,
following:
ears if the city has not issued permits for this project.1. Repeat this review in two y ty P •
building permit, city staff must approve a landscaping plan for2. Before the city issues a g p ,
the ro erty. This plan shall show the planting of a mix of Austrian Pine and NorwayPP
Pine trees to the west of the existing garage, on the north side of the proposed lease
area and northeast of the existing church building. (These are the areas noted. for
additional tree planting on the plans date - stamped May 15 2000.) These trees are to
Phel screen the base area. These trees shall be at least 8 feet tall, balled and
burls PP ed and shall, be planted in staggered rows as shown on the proposed plans.
between the tower lease area and the existing parking lot shall be3. The access drive betty .
paved with bituminous.
Community Design Review Board _ _ . • _ _
Minutes of 05-092 000
40 If the landscaping or trees are not installed by the completion of the tower, the city. = ::
shall require the applicant to provide a cash escrow or an.irrevocable letter.of credit for
requi r d work. The amount shad be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished .
r
the e P .
work. An unfinished landsca • in shall be completed within six weeks of occupancy:Any p • 9. .. -
develo merit mayIIworkshallfollowtheapprovedTans.. The .director of community - p y .5. A P -
approv_ a minor changes.
e g- feet -hi t with • no barbed wire. • : .. - _ - L • • • _ . • . - - .. .. • . ;!; _:
60 The chainlink fence shall b g .
70 The monopole shall be placed as shorn on page 9 of the May .3, 2000, staff report.
allBoardmemberLaCasAeS _se seconded. y - - - _
The motion passed. : .
AGENDA ITEM T2
AGENDA REPORT
Tea by Council
TO: Acting City Manager Date
FROM: City Engineer
Endorsed
Modified
SUBJECT: Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Improvements, Project 99 -13
Rejected
Assessment Objections
DATE: June 5, 2000
The city received six objections to the proposed - assessment for the project. Copies of
the written objections have been attached for reference. Staff has reviewed each
written objection and makes the following recommendations:
1026 MARY STREET NORTH, PIN 25- 29 -22 -24 -0014
The property owner has requested a senior citizen deferment and cancellation of the
assessment. No reasoning has been given for either request. Forms for the senior
citizen deferment would need to be completed by the property owner in order to qualify
them for a deferment.
It is recommended that the city council approve senior citizen deferment for the
property at 1026 Mary Street North, PIN 25- 29 -22 -24 -0014, upon a q ualified
submittal to the city clerk of the proper senior citizen deferment documentation
by the property owner.
1085 MARY STREET NORTH, PIN 25- 29 -22 -21 -0007
The property owner states they have a hardship to pay and that because they are on
the end of: the street and satisfied with the storm drainage that they should not be part
of the project.
Each property in the area contributes to the storm water runoff simply by its presence.
The storm water project proposed takes a neighborhood approach and, therefore,
everyone in the neighborhood has some responsibility to help finance that project.
It is recommended that no action be taken to change the proposed assessment
for 1085 Mary Street North, PIN 25- 29- 22 -22 -21 -00076
Project 99 -13 2 June 5, 2000
1083_STERLING STREET NORTHPIN 25- 29 -22 -21 -0003
The property owner has requested senior citizen deferment, disability hardship
deferment and cancellation of the assessment. The property owner's reason is that he
is paying one assessment. The property is very large, with 320 feet of frontage on the
street. The city proposes to assess the property for two units. Given the large size, this
seems appropriate.
It is recommended that the city council approve a senior citizen deferment for the
property at 1083 Sterling Street North, PIN 25- 29 -22 =21 -0003 upon a qualified
submittal to the city clerk of the proper senior citizen deferment documentation
by the property owner.
1070 MARY STREET NORTH, PIN 25- 29 -22 -24 -0021
The homeowner objects to the notification of the assessment amount and not receiving
a sewer hookup. No written notification about the assessment amount has been sent
out except by the official notice received by the homeowner in this case. The
assessment amount certainly was discussed a great length at a number of the
neighborhood meetings and anyone that attended those meetings was made aware of
what the proposed assessment would be. The second issue was concerning sewer
hookups. There is no sewer hookup proposed for this property, nor is there any
assessment proposed for a sewer hookup.
It is recommended that no action be taken to change the proposed assessment
for 1070 Mary Street North, PIN 25- 29 -22 -24 -0021.
1076 MARY STREET NORTH, PIN ,25- 29 -22 -24 -0022
The property owner is asking for cancellation of the assessment based on his assertion
that the called the city 1Y2 years ago wondering if there would be an assessment and
were told that none would be forthcoming. Secondly, he asserts that the assessment
amount was not mentioned until recently. The is the same procedure that applies to
anyone else on the project. About three weeks before the hearing, the official notices
of assessment were sent out with the amounts. Prior to that time, the assessments
were discussed at the meetings with the neighborhood. There is no way for the city to
verify whether the homeowner called the city 1Y2 years ago to ask about potential future
assessments. People do occasionally call requesting that information. We try to the
best of our ability to look into the future based on the capital improvements program
and other documents. This is not, however, a legal basis to object to an assessment.
It is recommended that no action be taken to change the proposed assessment
for 1076 Mary Street North, PIN 25- 29 -22 -24 -0022.
Project 99 -13 3 June 5, 2000
1017 STERLING STREET NORTH, PIN 25- 29 -22 -24 -0009
The properly owner has requested a senior citizen deferment and cancellation of the
assessment. The reason for the objection is they can't afford to pay for the work they
do not use and they have never used the street. The value of the improvement accrues
to the property and is the basis for the assessment.
It is recommended the city council approve a senior citizen deferment for the
property at 1017 Sterling Street North, PIN 25- 29 -22 -24 -0009, upon a qualified
submittal to the city clerk of the proper senior citizen deferment documentation
by the property owner.
KG H
jC
Attachments
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
BARTELMY ACRES NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99 -13
Address of assessed parcel t d o2 —// Ry SE&O
1
Property identification number:
12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight?
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
check one):
a. Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
b.. Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
C. Cancellat of assessment
d. Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
G P- A/ P. V I eioA e..
Print Name
Address of Property
Signature Date
7 & wj
Code Telephone
i State Zip
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
BARTELMY ACRES NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99 -13
Address of assessed parcel 4CA
j
Property identification number:
12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight?
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
check one):
a. Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
b.. Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
C. Cancellation of assessment
d. Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
L f is t H)
Wn
Print 14a Xigg-Fture Date
I d y 0,4 Z-dz-,q-7-5L
Address of Prope ry wner Code Telephone
An.
City State Zip
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
BARTELMY ACRES NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99 -13
Address of assessed parcel
Property identification number:
La'
12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight?
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
check one):
a. Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
b.. Disability hardship deferment (where* retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
C. Cancellation of assessment
d. El Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
V M Ii W. - 4/ aft 60
Peinf Name ri &nu Date
of Property Owner
City tate
0 4 V veel
Code Telephone
3' S'/ t I
Zip -
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
BARTELMY ACRES NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99 -13
Address of assessed parcel
Property identification number:
12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight?
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
check one):
a. El Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
b.
c.
d.
Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
Cancellation of assessment
Revision of assessment
Reason for the request: I
W vOt &
A00
wLau. WtSraivt._ X09.. Vj11. 1Ak
mo &4 vim, W\L vw\&. An
L\j V\A i'ma&e. Jo4n5v
Pd At Name 8iWature
luau %4
Address of Pro Owner
M"NL"-a YV\,.V\)
City
I
State
also dust vuu ikxA
W)"...4mAkt qkm b00 \X'n bwk
Date
Code reie
tt9
Zip
Aho ac kv AIAU tioe,ct ,„p w; .xuuiver!
AMN. uss J St vwF
5
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
BARTELMY ACRES NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99 -13
Address of assessed parcel 15 ;7r
Property identification number:
0.9. - Z - . . - &.!2 2ra-
12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ,IiJ
G Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
check one):
a. Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
b.. Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
CO- Cancellation of assessment
d. Revision duassessment,
Reason for the request:
s
Sig Date
0/6 ,ea,01A4,ej
Address of Pr party Owner Code Telephone
City V S to Zip
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
BARTELMY ACRES NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99 -13
Address of assessed parcel
Property identification number:
6000-
12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight? El
Yes No
COPY
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and .filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
check one):
a. Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
b.. Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
C. .Cancellation of assessmentnt __ o
d. El Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
0000 0
Print Name Signature Date
f ".!ro x", I
Address of Property Owner Code Telephone
sa
City '' State Zip
AGENDA ITEM NO.. K
Action by Council
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Staff Appeal of Comprehensive Sign Plan Revision for
Station
LOCATION: 1725 Beam Avenue
DATE: May 10, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Applicant's Request and Community Design Review Board Action
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
JoAnn etc at Birch Run
On May 9, 2000, the community design review board (CDRB) approved a sign plan revision for
JoAnn etc at Birch Run Station. Refer to the maps on pages 3-4. Laura Berjon, of Advance Sign
Group., had requested approval of seven additional signs on the front of their store. One sign of tag -
line copy would say "experience the creativity," below the main "JoAnn etc" sign. Ms. Berjon also
proposed six sub -text signs in line with "experience the creativity' across the front of the store.
These would say "fabrics, crafts, floral, seasonal, frames and home." Refer to the letter of request
and the proposed signs on pages 5-6.
The CDRB approved a variation of the applicant's proposal. They approved the six sub -text signs,
but did not approve the "experience the creativity" sign in the proposed location. Instead, the CDRB
approved the applicant's earlier design as shown on page 7, where "experience the creativity"
would be applied in smaller letters closer to the main JoAnn etc sign.
BACKGROUND
Existing Birch Run Station Sign Criteria
Refer to pages 8 -9 for the complete Birch Run Station sign criteria. Signs for the anchor stores
were approved based on the plans submitted to the board. There was no specific criteria created
for these stores. Any new anchor -store signs that would - be consistent with the size and placement
of previous signs on that space would be approved. The proposed seven additional signs are
excessive according to the previous sign approval for this space.
Code Requirement
Section 36 -231 requires that a comprehensive sign plan be provided for business premises with five
or more tenants. Comprehensive sign plans shall be reviewed by the CDRB. The applicant, staff or
the city council may appeal the CDRB's decision within 15 days of the board's action.
DISCUSSION
The board weighed the pros and cons of this request, and in a split vote (3 to 2), they approved the
request with the variation noted above. Those in favor of approving the additional signs felt it was
justified because the JoAnn's storefront is very long (240 feet). They felt that the additional signs on
this long elevation would break up the long expanse and make the building look less like a large
warehouse" and more like a viable and active store.
Staff is holding to our initial recommendation of denial for the following reasons:
1. The purpose of a comprehensive sign plan is to create a set of criteria for uniform and
consistent signage for a shopping center. The proposed signs would create an excessive
number of signs on the front of this store. If allowed, it would set a precedent for other anchor
stores at Birch Run Station that may wish to install similar signs to identify their product types.
2. The applicant had presented an earlier design for their main "JoAnn etc " sign which incorporated
the tag line "experience the creativity' into it as one sign. Refer to page 7. (This is the variation
of the "experience the creativity' sign the CDRB approved.) Staff had already verbally accepted
this sign since it met the intent of the sign plan for this anchor -store space. The applicant
subsequently revised the plan as presented to place this copy in line with the six sub -text signs.
3. To compare with the applicant's other stores, staff looked at the JoAnn etc store in the
Tamarack Village Shopping Center in Woodbury. This store only had the copy "JoAnn etc."
None of the other signs were displayed. It is difficult, therefore, to justify them for Birch Run
Station.
RECOMMENDATION
Denial of the proposed comprehensive sign plan change at Birch Run Station for JoAnn etc, based
on the following reasons:
1. Allowing the seven additional signs would set a precedent for allowing. similar additional signs
for the other anchor stores at Birch Run Station.
2. The proposed seven additional signs are excessive. JoAnn etc is already allowed four
signs —one on each of the two pylon signs, one on the east elevation and one on the store front.
Four signs is what the code would normally allow for a business on a corner lot.
3. The applicant has an optional design for the "experience the creativity" tag line which would
incorporate this message into the main "JoAnn etc" sign. This sign would meet the intent of the
current sign allowance for this tenant space.
4. The Woodbury JoAnn etc store is identified only by the words "JoAnn etc." Staff sees no reason
why the applicant must have the additional signs in this instance.
p:sec3 \joaannetc.s2
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3_. Letter from Rebecca J. McAdams dated April 6, 2000
4. Plans for the Proposed Store -Front Signs dated May 1, 2000
5. Earlier Sign Design dated April 7, 2000
6. Birch Ran Station Sign Criteria
7. CDRB Minutes dated May 10, 2000
8. Colored Elevation Drawing date - stamped May 1, 2000 (separate &achment)
2
It .
Attachment 1
h
S BIRCH RUN STATION o LYDIA
o
W :: i i i , 19
sr lic :••: •u
g • • • •• • :: • • i f '.
19
nApATZ
o - 1
N I}..,...v•s sin)AfA
1
Vf
111///soda I
POND • 1
cc
Y KOHLMAN AVMANdAV
ul '
a n o C > R C
r--- - .° 7 2 9 N R 2 2vi . _
Q
EOG EHILL RD t0 t
in Q : • im
vs
W OEMoFff AV o
R AV °C
V .
v ' w
BR00 AV av ? a
Etc
IN
IWO _•
a AV
SEXTANT =RAN T AV
GERVOtS GEW GERVNS AV '
u GrANOvtEw A1/ c
CT
W
c STLE AVIKINO0RmV
H RR IN AY Age=szh ...oc w w.• i
Mi• •• • • .
LOCATION MAP Q
N
3
co RD "o" •
cc
W J
W
Q
h
S BIRCH RUN STATION o LYDIA
o
W :: i i i , 19
sr lic :••: •u
g • • • •• • :: • • i f '.
19
nApATZ
o - 1
N I}..,...v•s sin)AfA
1
Vf
111///soda I
POND • 1
cc
Y KOHLMAN AVMANdAV
ul '
a n o C > R C
r--- - .° 7 2 9 N R 2 2vi . _
Q
EOG EHILL RD t0 t
in Q : • im
vs
W OEMoFff AV o
R AV °C
V .
v ' w
BR00 AV av ? a
Etc
IN
IWO _•
a AV
SEXTANT =RAN T AV
GERVOtS GEW GERVNS AV '
u GrANOvtEw A1/ c
CT
W
c STLE AVIKINO0RmV
H RR IN AY Age=szh ...oc w w.• i
Mi• •• • • .
LOCATION MAP Q
N
3
Attachment 2
W
Z
2
W
Y
i
0 too =N
o g
3 5A F. :
3
St M.
Q 71701n _ JOANN ETC
v
r T T
W-^ I I T T00l.
d
Ryty 5
U5 C--b r-wn U—
Rlt
us f.
tea•
W ItsI !t. M ]O ]1 7! =t
02
ANN FABRICS
W0 SF.
ML
HALLMARK
6.526 SF.
NEXT TO FAMOUS G`_`
NATURE SMEAR a
Will 9.
tug
22,
R' US
22, SF. AVAILABLE OuTLOT
G CT
MARSHALLS
27,000 SF. ..._._
OLIVE
GAROEN
Y
9,09b S.F.
5100 • NVALABIE OUTIOT
I• ti.
two If.
1
Z
W
Z
H
w
BEAM AVENUE
SITE PLAN
4
4
N
APR -06 -00 10:27 FROM : JOANN STORES INC
i "
Ar ril' 6, 2000
Mr. Tom Ekstrand
City Inspector
Maplewood city ball
1830 East County Road
1%4apl ewood, MN 551
RE: Jo -Ann etc #1
Birch Run Station
Maplewood, MN
Dear fir. Ekstrand,
ID: 330463B780 PACE 1I
Attachment 3
Thai you for takuig the time to review our request for additional silage at ou
Birch 'Run Station location. We are very excited to be introducing our expa'OO d format
Jo etc "experience the creativity" to a market that we have served for many years
acid have enjoye making good friends and great customers, We believe that our new
format will continue to sere those customers well for many years to Dome,
We appreciate your approval of the additional signa,ge to get our trade name
including the "experience the creativity" tag line on the face of the baiiding. Jo -Ann etc
experience the creativity's is the branding that we. u to convey the difference between
our new format and our Lraditioni Jo - Aim Fabric and Craft Stores. Your approval of the
side building sign will also help with that message. Our fm4l request is for the sub -text
signing on the face of she building. Sub -otext signing, #elps the customer further identify
the store with major department categories (fabrics, •c:afcs' floral, home, and
seasonal) and help us further define the concept to-n 4n "d old customers alike..
We have invested many resoaroes into d6Veloping the Jo -Arm etc "experience the
c: c tivity" concept and image. We consider the signagw as presented to be part of that
image. We hope that you will take this into consideration and approve our sub -text
signage submittal.
Thank you once please do not hesitate to call should you have further
questions.
Sin ;.:••,. ;,':lit' ..Sin crely,
Rebeoca J. McAdams
Director of Construction
eapRarato Offico and Distribution Centep
O Q' O Q h w w a.r nr L 4• A r. as w A L * am r/ At w' I W L a m^ **A d r d A r A A aa. rs ra.• ii a A0 am a + a ar
5
d
E PROPOSED SIGN DESIGN
40' - 0 "
9' -0"
SCALE: 118" =1'-0"
JOANN'" & "ETC" -
CUSTOM FABRICATED .063" ALUMINUM 8" DEEP CHANNEL RETURNS FINISHED WHITE 3116" PLEXIGLASS FACES WITH 2" WHITE TRIMCAP
RETAINERS - NOTE PLEX COLOR SPECS. ALL LETTERS ILLUMINATED WITH 15MM 60MA TURQUOISE NEON TUBING WITH THE EXCEPTION
OF THE MAGENTA LETTERS ILLUMINATED WITH WHITE NEON TUBING AS REQ'D. FOR PROPER ILLUMINATION, POWERED BY 30MA
TRANSFORMERS. RACEWAY MOUNTED INSTALLATION. NOTE: FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION PER U.L. SPECIFICATIONS.
43' -9"
oty2'_6" the creat
EXPERIENCE THE CREATIVITY" & SUBTEXT -
SCALE: 118" =1' -0"
CUSTOM FABRICATED .063" ALUMINUM 5" DEEP CHANNEL RETURNS FINISHED WHITE 3116" PLEXIGLASS FACES WITH 2" WHITE TRIMCAP
RETAINERS - NOTE PLEX COLOR SPECS. ALL LETTERS ILLUMINATED WITH 15MM 60MA WHITE NEON TUBING AS REQ'D. FOR PROPER
ILLUMINATION, POWERED BY 60MA TRANSFORMERS. RACEWAY MOUNTED INSTALLATION. NOTE: FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION
PER U.L. SPECIFICATIONS.
EO 8'•10" EO EO EO EO 7'•5" EO 6'4 11
EO EO EO EQ
t . t , ; ; EOc , d.j trA
h _. }P . 7r «:• n- ' Ret t , + `' uti. t,.' tst ti71r: •i, tt4 1
7 , , ?,'
1i.t7Y s l tr .7 ={ . ''Lr t Zi .. .. . ' { •. .. ; .tp+•
expe ence the creat vit y ;
1 p.. ` `V I U . d'C ` ,' 1 11 f .I .t. '' C , ' 7t { `tN' !4 {
BUILDING SOUTH (FRONT) ELEVATION
ADVANCE SIGN GROUP
w 'Your IMAGE is Our BUSINESS!' DATE DRAWING # DESIGNER: FRED DENT
1250 MEMORY LANE (614) 253 - 2206 00 - 039 - 1 PROJECT:
COLUMBUS, OH 43209 FAX (614) 253 -2251 2124100 1 OF 2
SCALE: PROPORTIONAL
MAY 0120QG
SALESPERSON: LAURA BERJON
JOANN ETC
MAPLEWOOD, MN.
PLEX #2047 GREEN
PLEX #71138 WHITE
VT2577 MAGENTA VINYL OVERLAY
y
5"
RACEWAY
LETTER BODY
TRIMCAP
PLEXIGLASS
NEON
HOUSING
114" DRAIN HOLES
TRANSFORMER
RACEWAY MOUNTED INSTALLATION
N.T.S.
9'-0" T•2"
EO E EQ EO
C
Q
a
C
2'-0"
SCALE
AS
NOTED
Lolj
Y:
h
EARLIER SIGN
z
40' -0" — <Z
7
PLEX #2047 GREEN
PLEX #7138 WHITE
9-0" 10' -0" VT2577 MAGENTA VINYL OVERLAY
8 " &5"
ex erience the creativit • -~ zpRACEWAY •
LETTER BODY 7•
27' -5" TRWCAP
PLEXIGLASS <
INDIVIDUALLY ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS SCALE: 118" = 1' -0" NEON M
JOANN' & "ETC" • HOUSING .<.
CUSTOM FABRICATED .063" ALUMINUM 8" DEEP CHANNEL RETURNS FINISHED WHITE 3116" PLEXIGLASS FACES WITH 2" WHITE TRIMCAP _ •
RETAINERS. NOTE PLEX COLOR SPECS. ALL LETTERS ILLUMINATED WITH 15MM 60MA TURQUOISE NEON TUBING WITH THE EXCEPTION eft
OF THE MAGENTA LETTERS ILLUMINATED WITH WHITE NEON TUBING AS REQ'D. FOR PROPER ILLUMINATION, POWERED BY 30MA
TRANSFORMERS. RACEWAY MOUNTED INSTALLATION. NOTE: FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION PER U.L. SPECIFICATIONS. -
EXPERIENCE THE CREATIVITY" & SUBTEXT- 114' DRAIN HOLES IZ
CUSTOM FABRICATED .063" ALUMINUM 5" DEEP CHANNEL RETURNS FINISHED WHITE 3116" PLEXIGLASS FACES WITH 2" WHITE TRIMCAP TRANSFORMER
RETAINERS. NOTE PLEX COLOR SPECS. ALL LETTERS ILLUMINATED WITH 15MM 60MA WHITE NEON TUBING AS REQ'D. FOR PROPER RACEWAY MOUNTED INSTALLATION HILLUMINATION, POWERED BY 60MA TRANSFORMERS. RACEWAY MOUNTED INSTALLATION. NOTE: FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION N.T.S.
PER U.L. SPECIFICATIONS.
EQ W-1 O' EQ EQ EQ EQ T -5' EQ 6'•1 11'-6' 9'4' T•2"
EQ EQ EQ EQ
EQ EQ EQ EQ
oxp donee ttw Creativity ,
cram
1 . I.. . . y W • 1,.
e
f PiUILDINGSOUTH ( FRONT) ELEVATION SCALE: PROPORTIONAL
APR i 40ADVANCESIGNGROUP .
ILJ 'Your IMAGE is Our BUSINESS.' DATE DRAWING # DESIGNER: FRED DENT SALESPERSON LAURA 6ERJON SCALE
1250 MEMORY LANE (614) 253 -2206 _ _ PROJECT JOANN ETC' AS
COLUMBUS OH 43209 FAX 614 53 51 zl2aoo 01 of2 MAPLEWOOD , MRA ( ) 2 NOTED
erect a V shaped sign with a limit of 300 s(I. tt. and 5U tt. in neignt.
and a panel on the sign on Beam.Attachment 6
Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Councilmembers Juker, Zappa
Nays - Mayor Bast i an, Council members
Carlson, Rossbach
i
MOT I OH Fad LED
e. Councilmember Ros BIRCH
SIGN CRITERIA
RUN STATIO s on Southlawn and
t erect sha ft. hi h.
Seconded by Councilme uncilmembers Juker, Zappa
11 -8 -93 yor Bastian, Counci 1 members
rlson, Rossbach .
MOTION FAILED
f. ... Mayon Bastian moved to accept the staff recommendation to:
1. Waive the maximum sign area for the existing sign on Beam Avenue -
and the proposed sign on Southlawn Drive. This would allow a
420- square -foot sign on Beam Avenue and a 720- square -foot sign.
on Southlawn Drive. The maximum size allowed by Code for each
sign is 300 square feet.
2. Waive the maximum combined area for the two ground signs on
Southlawn Drive and Beam Avenue. The combined area of these two
signs would be 1140 square feet, or 690 square feet over the
Code limit.
3. Waive the maximum height to allow a 70- foot -tall sign on
Southlawn Drive. The maximum height allowed by the Code is 25
feet.
4. Change the Birch Run Station Sign Plan to be as follows:
a) Signage for the outlots shall be subject to CDRB
approval upon submittal of those- i n d i v i d u a l sign
proposals.
b) The shopping center identification clock tower sign is
not approved. Plans shall be submitted for CDRB
approval.
c) A pylon sign is approved on Beam Avenue as shown on the
sketch dated August 12, 1993. A second pylon sign is
approved at a maximum size of 720 square feet and a
maximum height of 70 feet. This sign shall replace the
existing pylon sign on Southlawn Drive. The wall
s i gnage for the five original anchor stores are approved
as described in the memorandum dated September 5, 1989.
The Office Max wall sign is approved as described in the
October 7, 1993 staff memo. Changes to anchor store
signs may be approved by staff, based on code compliance
and proper design. The applicant may place the
Maplewood City logo on the pylon signs, subject to
design approval by staff.
d) Tenants shall be limited to one sign on the front fascia
of the canopy. These signs shall be neon or constructed
of individual letters, mounted on a raceway. Copy
height shall not exceed 42 inches. Signs shall not be
closer than 18 inches to either side of the tenant;s
store front. This criteria allows an except ioii for the
Famous Footwear sign to be eight inches from the right
side of the store's edge. A future sign for the tenant
8 -- 11 -8 -93
afn- :.e.R.r.!^'C'f'""'rw^'i""" w+.,. - _ - 1 - .w ..<..'.r e4..ri i r + rd..+ b•..,... a.. e<. r...- ... +w1...lrsaott..v..' `.ra._.X...w.r'h.. .,...:•.rs :.. . -..... ... .'c .. N..-.. .t .__ .a. •:,..,
to the north must be at least three feet from the Fainuus
Footwear sign. When the Famous Footwear sign is
removed, a new sign shall be at least ten " i nches from
either side of the gable facade.
e Business i dent i f i cati on signs for the west and north
sides of the shopping center shall be subject t
approval by the CDRB if proposed in the future.
f) Six anchor store tenant signs are allowed on the east -
end elevation facing Southlawn Drive. These signs shall
not exceed two feet in height and must be centered
horizontally on this wall.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers
Carlson, Rossbach
flays - Councilmembers Juker, Zappa
1AYOR BASTIAN LEFT IE MEETING AT 8:53 PeMe AND ACTING MAYOR JUK$ ASSUMED THE CHAIR.
3. Truth- in -Hous g Ordinances:
a. Manager McG 're presented the staff report.
b. Director of Co unity Development Olson p sented the specifics of the
report.
c. Acting Mayor Juke asked if anyone wi ed to speak before the Council
regarding this matt The followin was heard:
Lori LaBey, 1158 L k, repres t i ng the St. Paul Board of Realtors
Ordinance Exempting Family Mem : Ka page 3): 1st Reading
d. Councilmember Zappa moved the Ordin on a e 3 of the s
r e,g o, t
MOTION DIED FOR LACK O/AECONDNOFURTHERACTIONWAS
Ordinance Deleti Exemptions (page 4): 1st Rea %"ne. Councilme er.Carlson moved to approve the Hance on page 4 of t
staff re rt.
Seconded Councilmember Juker Ayes - A c i n g M a y o r J u k e r,
Coun 1member Carlson
flays - Counc members Rossbach, Zappa
f. Acting Mayor Juker moved to table for two weeks to dove er 22 1993
S conded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
9 --
Attachment 7
Community Design Review Board
Minutes of 05 -09 -2000
B. Birch Run Station Sign Plan Revision for JoAnn Etc., 1725 Beam Avenue
Secretary Torn Ekstrand presented the staff report. Staff, after viewing the JoAnn etc. store
in Woodbury, felt the six additional signs were excessive. If the board denied the proposed
sign plan, the applicant would have the option of using the JoAnn sign with the words
experience the creativity" close to it or simply use the Joann, etc. sign alone as they did in
Woodbury. Mr. Ekstrand said, if the applicant decided to drop the six small signs, he would
approve it.
John Rieter of Arrow Sign Company was present representing Laura Berjon (of Advance Sign
Group) and JoAnn Fabrics. He said the trend in signs is to list their services or supplies in the
signage. Mr. Rieter also pointed out that this is a big store and the owner wanted 'it to look
like such —not like an empty store. He noted other stores in the metropolitan area that have
the same type of signage that is being requested.
Chairperson Ledvina agreed with the staff recommendation and thought too much extra
signage was "visual pollution." He also suggested that the board act on this request in a
positive way" and felt "JoAnn etc." with "experience the creativity" was acceptable.
Boardmember Shankar was not in favor of allowing the line "experience the creativity." He
thought there were too many long malls that look "after five o'clock like an abandoned
warehouse." Mr. Shankar said allowing a few of the ancillary signs helps "to bring life to the
whole strip mall." He summarized by saying he was in favor of deleting the line "experience
the creativity," but keeping the other six signs.
Another boardmember agreed with Mr. Shankar that "experience the creativity" was too
much. He also felt it would be a long empty - looking space without the additional signs.
Mr. Ekstrand said he was most concerned with the issue of precedence to avoid excessive
signage. He preferred the large JoAnn sign with "experience the creativity" immediately
under it.
Boardmember Shankar moved the Community Design Review Board amend the staff s
recommendations for JoAnn etc. at Birch Run Station to allow the applicant six additional
signs as shown on the sign plan dated May 1, 2000, and require deletion of the line
experience the creativity." The applicant will be allowed to incorporate this sentence into the
JoAnn sign as constructed at another project. The approved sign would then be as shown on
the sign plan dated April 7, 2000. If the square footage of the JoAnn, etc. store is reduced in
the future, the community design review board retains -the right to reduce the number of
ancillary signs approved at this meeting.
Boardmember LaCasse seconded. Ayes -- Shankar, LaCasse, Johnson
Nays Jorgenson, Ledvina
The motion passed.
VII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
There were no visitor presentations.
10
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD = _ =•- - • ,
1830 -COUNTY ROAD '13 EAST . LEWOOD, 'MINNESOTA 'f
MAY 9, 20002000 ' . • . t
a • - } - .. • • • • _ , .4 _ ^r - . f • •• J ,f_.• .! Y + -~
f fi. •••••' ••' .;, —• •'+ • .. r, - +,
k^ - ' • '_ - • • _ • .. 1, - •r
r ' 1 - / i .. /. • .
f .. ••^ / ^'
F .• •• - .` VI. •.DESIGN REVIEW . . •... j - ..• : \ '•• . ` . .. J . , • _.•. •. •, -.. :..,. • . ... _ . . ;. -. ' , .•: . -, -- : ' _ •.: •. ... y •
B. Birch Run Station Sign Plan Revision for JOAnn E_ tc., 1725 Beam.Avenue '
Secretary Tom Ekstrand presented the staff re ort..Staff; .after the JoAnn• etc.', storet
in Woodbury, felt the six additional signs were excessive. If the board denied the ' ro osed
sign plan, the applicantwould have the option of :using - the JoAnn sign •the 'words r: -
0 4F
experience the creative close to it or sim I use the J etc: si n one as the • did •'gin = `f -• j • J . j.
Woodbury.. ,Mr. Ekstrand said -.if the appficant' decided to drop the' six small .signs, he would
approve it:. : :. • •. • • :.: -... .. - _ - • • _ • .. - • • ::. •... . . • . •.. •. - :._ ,::...: .• •:. •,• z,:_ :.
John Rieter of Arrow S.i n Compan • was present representing Laura Berjon (. Advance Sign
F'Group) and JoAnn Fabrics. He said the trend in ns - is to their services or supplies in the
signage. Mr. Rieter also pointed out that this is a big store and the owner wanted it to look ;
like such =not like an empty 'store. He noted other stores in the metropblitan area that have
the same type of signage that is being requested. = - • • . -.:• .:
Chairperson Ledvina agreed with the staff recommendation and thought too much extra
si na a was "visual pollution." He also suggested that the -board act on this request in a` - :i•:
positive way and felt "JoAnn etc. with experience the creativity was acceptable.
Boardmember Shankar was'not in favor of allowing' the line "experience the creativity." He
thought there were too many long malls that look "after five O'clock like an abandoned - : • : -
warehouse." Mr. Shankar said allowing a few of the ancilla - si ns helps "to bring life Ao the r _9 rY 9
r whole strip mall," He summarized by saying he was in favor of deleting the .line "experience _
the creativity.," but keeping the other six signs. -
Another boardmember agreed with Mr. Shankar.that "experience the creativity" was too
much. He also felt it would be a long empty- looking space without the additional signs. ' •.
Mr. Ekstrand said he was most concerned with the issue of precedence to avoid excessive
si na e. He preferred the large JoAnn sign with "experience the creativity" immediately -,=9 9 9 -
under it. -- - - •.` ' '- -- - •• ..• - •-.:
Boardmember Shankar moved the Community Design Review Board amend the staffs
recommendations for JoAnn etc. at Birch Run Station to allow the applicant six additional = -
signs as shown on the sign plan dated May 1, 2000, and require deletion of the line
experience the creativity." The applicant will be allowed to incorporate this sentence into the
JoAnn sign as constructed at another project. The approved sign would then be as shown on.
the sign plan dated April 7, 2000. - if the square footage of the ' JoAnn, etc. store is reduced in
f ' the future, the community design review -board retains the right to reduce the number of
ancillary signs approved at this meeting.
0
f _ Boardmember LaCasse seconded. Ayes— Shankar, LaCasse; Johnson -
Nays -- Jorgenson, Ledvina
The motion passed. -
MEMORANDUM
AGENDA ITEM No
Action by Couw l
TO:City Manager
FROM:Environmental Health Official
RE:REQUEST FOR RECYCLING COST INCREASE
DATE:May 10, 2000
Date
Endorsed M.
Modified
Dejected
Superior Services, the city's recycling contractor, has requested by letter a rate increase in its
tonnage charge from $88 to $94.67 per ton.. They have also requested that oil and antifreeze
be dropped from the list of materials collected. (See attachment.) The change in the per ton
charge is approximately 7% which will result in an increase of 33 cents per quarter per
residence.
The $88 per ton rate has been in effect for 4 Y2 years of the current 7- year contract.
Paragraph 2 -b of the contract states that "the charge may be changed, based upon increases in
operating costs for Gopher (Superior Services) by Superior Services giving to the city written
notice of such change on or before December 1, and the city agreeing to the change." No price
increase has been requested prior to this. The waste oil and antifreeze were added to the
program several years ago as an experiment by the previous owner. They were not a part of
the original agreement.
Superior Services has requested the rate change due to increased labor and fuel costs.
Although they did not provide specific documentation for this, it is common knowledge that their
costs have increased. We have found it difficult to compare our cost to that of other cities in the
area due to differences in programs and in the method of billing. Only two other cities in the
area pay per ton - Lake Elmo $130 /ton and St. Paul District 14 $89 /ton (no plastics). Other
cities pay a flat rate per household. Although it is more difficult to budget for, we prefer the per
ton payment for the incentive to increase the tonnage collected. In converting Maplewood's per
ton rate to a flat rate p household, it would appear that a rate increase is warranted. Due to
contract language and budget limitations, a rate increase could not be made effective until
January 1, 2001.
The oil and antifreeze collection was started by Michael Hinz, the previous owner of the
company, on an experimental basis. At that time, we were not aware of any other city that had
ever tried collecting these materials. It was a well intended experiment, but never worked out
very well. The oil and antifreeze account for more problems and complaints than any other
material collected. There are numerous outlets for waste oil and antifreeze at garages, and the
amount that we do collect is quite minimal.
Council approve a rate change to $94 per ton effective January 1, 2001, and eliminate waste oil
and antifreeze from the list of materials collected.
jl /mem /increase
Superior Services
April 21, 2000 1375 7th Ave.
P.O. Box 281
o Newport, MN 55055
Mr. Ken Haider (651) 459 -3029
City of Maplewood FAX (651) 458 -8455
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Haider,
Over the past several years, - it has been our pleasure to provide the City of Maplewood with prompt,
reliable and efficient recyclable material collection service.
As you have likely seen in your own household, the cost of doing business continues to rise. The tight labor
market in recent years has caused wage rates to escalate substantially. The recent extra ordinary increase,
over 55% year to date, in fuel cost has also effected our operations. To continue to attract and retain high
caliber people for our team, we have made necessary changes to our wage scale and benefits. We feel these
adjustments were required for us to provide a quality service to our customers and we believe the results
are showing in our performance.
Unfortunately, we can not continue to absorb these increase costs and therefore, are respectfully requesting
an increase in the rate per ton that we are paid for the collection of recyclable materials. As you may know,
the rate we are paid per ton for collection of recycling material has not changed since the initial contract
date. Superior Services truly values your business and is committed to providing the best possible service
at a competitive price. The proposed rate per ton we are requesting is $94.67 per ton of recyclable material
collected. This rate was calculated using the initial contract rate of $88.00 per ton and applying the annual
CP1 — U adjustment for Minneapolis/ St Paul for the years 1997,1998 and 1999. Robert Wenger and
Melinda Coleman were given a copy of the supporting documents for this increase during our April 6, 2000
meeting.
I would like to request that motor oil and antifreeze be removed form the list of recyclable items collected
curbside. Superior Services is an a company that truly believes in protecting the environment, our
employees and the communities we service. We can not be sure the fluids that are set out for collection are
pure and do not contain solvents and other potentially dangerous fluids. In addition the 'containers used by
the residents often leak and are a risk to environment if they leak or are spilled. Residents can properly
dispose of used oil at Jiffy Lube and other businesses that sell oil. Enclosed are the WCA requirements
for used oil transporters for your review.
In conclusion, Superior Services respectfully requests an increase in the rate paid per ton of recyclable
material collected from $88.00 per ton to $94.67 per ton and requests that used motor oil and antifreeze be
removed from the list of recyclable materials collected at the curb.
If you any questions please feel free to contact me at 651- 768 -5273. I look forward to working with you
and your staff to make the City's recycling program the best it can be.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey T Glewwe
General Manager
Superior Services — St Paul
PROVIDING "SUPERIOR" BASTE SERVICES
Agenda Item No. - K3
Ammon by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
PURCHASE OF TAX- FORFEIT PROPERTY (VAN DYKE STREET)
This item was addressed at the Council /Manager Workshop and there will be no further staff
report issued.
AGENDA ITEM K A_
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Acting City Manager
FROM: City Engineer
SUBJECT: No Parking —Adele Street
DATE: June 5, 2000
Actiat by C1
NW-0
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The city received a letter from Shari Yoch, who lives on the northeast corner of Adele
and East Shore Drive. According to her letter, she has been having a problem with cars
parking on the grass and littering the yard area. She has requested the area between
East Shore Drive and her driveway be posted no parking to help this problem. There is
no great need for on- street parking in this area. Therefore, the city should not object to
restricting parking according to the request.
It is recommended the city council establish a no- parking zone on the east side of
Adele Street from East Shore Drive to the first driveway north.
KG H
jC
Mr. Ken Haider
City Engineer
Maplewood City Hall
1830 E. County Rd. B
Maplewood, MN 55149
May 22, 2000
Dear Ken Haider,
I'm writing regarding placing a "No Parking" sign on our side street, Adele Street, (east
side of street), from East Shore Drive to our driveway. Where isn't any curb so people pull
right up and park on our grass, park blocking our walkway to the street, and throw their
trash and bottles on our property, especially during the summer months and fishing
season. It is very frustrating, we've put notes on cars to no avail. We would greatly
appreciate your help in this matter. Tbank you.
Sincerely, t
w
Shari Yoch
1828 East Shore Drive
Maplewood, MN 55109
651-774-
651- 642 -1509 work
Driveway
Adele St.