HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 05-22 City Council PacketHRA Interviews - 5:00 p.m.
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, May 22, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -10
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Council/Manager Workshop (May 8, 2000)
2. Minutes of Meeting 00 -09 (May 8, 2000)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
1. HRA Appointment
2. Resignation and Resolution - Regina Laroche - Theune
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted
by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the
Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. McKnight Road EVP, Project 98 -09
3. Brad L. Beatty and William C. Schwartz - Approval of Used Car Lot
4. Temporary Gambling -VFW Post 8901 at Ramsey County Fair
5. Temporary Gambling - St. Paul East Park Lions at Ramsey County Fair
6. Ramsey County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Agreement
7. Acceptance of Grant Funds
8. HRC Annual Report
9. Disposal of Old Financial Records
10. Transfer to Close Tilsen North Street Project
11. Transfer to Close Nine Improvement Project Funds
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. Carver Elementary School Conditional Use Permit Revision (2680 Upper Afton Road)
2. 7:10 P.M. Assessment Hearing, Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, Project 99 -13
3. 7:30 P.M. Sprint PCS Telecommunications Monopole (2500 Hudson Place)
A. Conditional Use Permit
B. Design Approval
4. 7:45 P.M. Maplewood Fire Station (Clarence Street)
A. Conditional Use Permit Revision
B. Design and Plan Revisions
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, Project 99 -13
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Hazelwood Improvements, Project 99 -07 - Assessment Objections
2. Deer Management
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Transfer of Funds for New Fire Station
2. Budget Appropriation -East County Line Fund
3. 2001 -2005 Capital Improvement Plan (4 Votes)
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Update on the New Fire Station
2.
3.
4.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for
this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make
arrangements. Assistant Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
rM
City of Maplewood
CITY COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP
Meeting Minutes
Monday, May 8, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
6:00 p.m.
A. Call To Order
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Cardinal at 6:00 p.m.
Be Roll Call
Mayor Robert Cardinal
Present
Councilmember Sherry Allenspach
Present
Councilmember Kenneth Collins
Present
Councilmember Marvin Koppen
Present
Councilmember Julie Wasiluk
Present
Others Present:
Acting City Manager Kenneth Haider
Finance Director Daniel Faust
Community Development Director Melinda Coleman
City Clerk Karen Guilfoile
C. Approval of Agenda
Councilmember Koppen added Gl, Open Space and Bruentrup Farm and H1, Residential Parking.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the agenda with additions. The motion was seconded by
Councilmember Koppen. The motion passed 5 -0.
D. 1999 Annual Financial Report and Audit
Finance Director Dan Faust introduced the specifics of the report and reviewed the 1999 Financial
Highlights.
Steve Laibel of KPMG Peat Marwick reviewed the annual financial report and audit reports, as well as
reports covering 1) conduct of audit letter; 2) legal compliance audit report letter and 3) schedule of
Federal Finance Assistance.
E. Financial Report on Community Center
Finance Director Faust presented the financial report on the Community Center Operations Fund for
1999 and the first three months of 2000. The 1999 operating loss of 13,484 was $5,738 greater than in
1998. In 1999, operating revenue increased 6.9% and operating expense increased 7.2 %. The 2000
operating income of $45,393 was $29,310 less than 1999. In 2000, operating revenues increased 0.2%
and operating expenses increased 8.2% compared to 1999.
Parks and Recreation Director Anderson clarified that the revenue shortfall in the first quarter of 2000
was partly due to wage increases and to the fitness area expansion project. He noted the new fitness area
should be open on schedule and use of the Community Center should increase. He felt confident that
they will meet their goal for 2000 of breaking even.
.Mayor 'Cardinal directed Parks and Recreation' Director Anderson to prepare answers to the following
questions for a future Council /Manager workshop:
1. What is the maintenance program and schedule for the Community Center?
2. Who is responsible for the maintenance schedule and program at the Community
Center?
3. Who evaluates and monitors the maintenance schedule and program at the
Community Center?
4. Who schedules regular maintenance budgets needed upgrades at the Community Center
F. Personnel Decisions International
Pat Crowns and Harry Growth discussed the hiring process for the future City Manager. Pat Crowns
noted a general consensus in the desired qualities for the new City Manager. The new City Manager
should have a positive image and presence, be of high integrity, have strong communication skills and
be seasoned. Harry Growth discussed the levels of recruitment effort and the time frame for the hiring
process.
G. Other Business
1. Open Space and Bruentrup Farm
Councilmember Koppen noted since the City is short staffed without a City Manager and Assistant to
the City Manager, that someone be hired on a contractual basis for the summer to deal with issues such
as Open Space. Acting City Manager Haider suggested that internal reshuffling of staff and temporary
hiring could accomplish these goals.
H. Future Topics
1. Residential Parking
I. Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Cardinal moved and Councilmember Koppen seconded a motion
to adjourn the meeting at 7:00 p.m.
D2-
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, May 8, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -09
A. CALL TO ORDER:
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal
Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
C. ROLL CALL:
Robert Cardinal, Mayor
Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember
Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember
Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember
Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember
Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 00 -08 (April 24, 2000) as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the Agenda as amended.
K3. Add North High Academic Decathlon
M1. Pawn Shops and Check Cashing Shops
M2. Commissions
M3. Ed Omara
M4. Travel and Training
M5. Access to City Offices
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS:
None
1
G. CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk
1. Approval of Claims
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$42,133.45
$130,961.49
$107,72'7.46
$2,429.00
$224
$208,315.98
Ayes - all
Checks #8276 thru #8282 dated 4 -14 thru 4 -19 -00
Checks #49371 thru #49452 dated 4 -25 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 4 -18 thru 4 -24 -00
Checks #8283 thru #8288 dated 4 -21 thru 4 -28 -00
Checks #49455 thru #49547 dated 5 -2 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 4 -25 thru 5 -1 -00
$716,017.67 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$464,534.20 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 4 -28 -00
$22 Payroll Deduction check #78379 thru #78384 dated 4 -28 -00
$487,220.25 Total Payroll
$1,203,237.92 GRAND TOTAL
2. Liquor License - Ardeshir Boozary at the Future Bennigan's Restaurant
Approved the On -Sale Liquor License for Ardeshir Boozary to be used at the future Bennigan's Restaurant.
3. Temporary Food License Fee Waiver - Boy Scout Troop 187
Approved the miscellaneous permit to sell food at the Arlington Hills United Methodist Church and waived the
$43.00 permit fee.
2
4. Temporary Food License Fee Waiver - Cub Scout Pack 64
Approved the miscellaneous permit to sell food at the Cross Lutheran Church and waived the $43.00 permit fee.
5. Amendment to the Maplewood Nature Center Deed
Adopted the following Resolution, amending the nature center deed and furthermore, that the city attorney be
directed to modify the nature center deed to include the two restrictions as outlined in the resolution:
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 051
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Department of Taxation conveyed to the City of Maplewood
certain tax forfeited lands, now known as the Maplewood Nature Center, in January, 1968.
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has requested that the City of Maplewood
amend the above - referenced deed to comply with the Department of Natural Resources Outdoor Recreation
Project Agreement.
AND WHEREAS, the above referenced deed will be amended to add the following restrictions:
1. The property shall be managed and maintained for outdoor recreation purposes consistent
with the approved grant application; and .
2. The property may not be used for any other purpose without the express prior written approval of
the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, COUNTY OF
RAMSEY, STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1. That the City of Maplewood will amend the above - referenced deed to add the restrictions
requested by the Department of Natural Resources.
Dated this 8th day of May, 2000.
6. Budget Adjustment for Park Development Fund
Directed the finance director to prepare a budget modification to include a line item in the P.A.C. fund in the
amount of $50,000 from the uncommitted P.A.C. fund balance for minor park improvements.
7. Bids for Used Vehicles - Police Department
Accepted the bids that were opened on April 21, 2000, for used police and forfeited vehicles.
3
8. Conditional Use Permit Review -Pep Boys (South of 2570 White Bear Avenue)
Approved the review of the conditional use permit for Pep Boys Automotive Center south of 2570 White Bear
Avenue in one year if construction has started. If the applicant does not begin construction within one year, this
permit shall end as required by the code.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 7:00 P.M. Hazelwood Street Improvements, Project 99 -07 - Assessment Hearing
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the
report.
c. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings.
d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Austin Ward, 2555 Hazelwood Street
Clarence and Donna Gervais, 2420 Hazelwood Street
Carol VanKnight, 2566 Hazelwood Street
Kraig Galloway, 2460 Hazelwood Street
Evelyn Galloway, 2480 Hazelwood Street
Doug Frid, 2467 Hazelwood Street
Mike Voss, 1522 East Brooks Avenue
John Simons, 2409 Hazelwood Street
Steve Starlow, 1763 Barclay Street
e. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following Resolution, approving the adoption of the Assessment
Roll for Project 99 -07:
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 052
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council has met and heard
and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Hazelwood Street Improvements
as described in the files of the city clerk as Project 99 -07, and has amended such proposed assessment as it
deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
E
1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof,
is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15, the
first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the
rate of 7.0 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first
installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,
2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion
of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and
hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not
made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when
changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible.
4., To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the
improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed,
therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section
420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of
such later extension or improvements.
5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be
extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the
same manner as other municipal taxes.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
2. 7:10 P.M. (8:00) Club FTS Conditional Use Permit (1351 Frost Avenue)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Dale Trippler presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following person was heard:
Ron Michaletz, 303 Cherry Lane, Lino Lakes
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
5
Councilmember Allenspach moved to adopt the following Resolution, approving a conditional use permit for a
coffee lounge at 1351 Frost Avenue. Approval is based on the findin s required by the code and subject to:
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 053
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Ron Michaletz applied for a conditional use permit for a coffee shop in a BC(M) (business
commercial modified) district.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1351 Frost Avenue. The legal description is:
GLADSTONE, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, BLOCK 7
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On April 17, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On May 8, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance
to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of
the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional
use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the
city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property,
because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water
runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into
the development design.
on
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction, renovations and improvements shall comply with the building code.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit
shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year, unless the use is in operation and there have
been no complaints or problems. In this event, the conditional use permit shall be reviewed again
only if a problem arises.
4. The hours of operation shall be: 4 p.m. to 10 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 4 p.m. to 1 a.m.
Friday and Saturday. The city council may review these hours and make adjustments as warranted
if there are complaints.
S. Before the city issues an occupancy certificate for this use, the property owner shall clean up the
property behind the building, repair the canopy on the front of the building, replace the broken
window pane on "Permanent Skin Art," install a 100 percent solid gate on the front of the trash
enclosure and restripe the parking lot.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on May 8, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve that the property owner clean up the property behind the
building, repair the canopy on the front of the building, replace the broken window pane on "Permanent Skin
Art ", install a 100 percent solid gate on the front of the trash enclosure and restripe the parking lot. These items
shall be performed even if the applicant drops his request. The deadline for this work shall be two months from
the date of this council action.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
3. 7:20 P.M. (8:10 P.M.) Forest Products Shop (Highway 61 and County Road C)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Dale Trippler presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
VA
Mike Trenda, 2474 Adele Street
Rick Sorenson, 1215 County Road C
Conrad S o 1 ab erg, Property Owner
Frederick Richter, Steiner Development, Architect for the Project
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
A. Setback Variance
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following Resolution, approving a 22 -foot building setback from
the Highwa y 61 right- of -wav, a seven -foot parking lot setback variance from the frontage road right-of-way,
and a variance for a 5% lot shoreland coverage variance. The code requires 30 feet and 15 feet:
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 054
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Conrad Solberg, of Forest Products, applied for a 22 -foot building setback variance to build
a cabinet -shop building eight feet from the Highway 61 right -of -way, for a seven -foot parking lot setback
variance to build a corner of a parking lot eight feet from the frontage road right -of -way and for a 5 percent lot -
coverage variance to exceed the maximum permitted lot coverage in a shoreland boundary area.
WHEREAS, these variances apply to the undeveloped property at the northeast corner of Highway 61
and County Road C. The legal description is:
THE EAST 150 FEET OF THE WEST 394.54 FEET OF THE SOUTH 316.30 FEET OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29,
RANGE 22; ALSO THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 349.31 FEET OF THE WEST 199.54 FEET AT
SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 LYING
EASTERLY OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF WHITE BEAR LAKE ROAD.
WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c)(5 and 6) requires that buildings be set back 30 feet from street right -of-
way and that parking lots be set back 15 feet from street right -of -way.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing that their building have an eight foot setback, that their parking
lot also have an eight foot setback at one point and that the total impervious- surface area exceed the allowed lot
coverage by 5 percent.
WHEREAS, this requires variances of 22 feet, seven feet and 5 percent.
WHEREAS, the history of these variances is as follows:
1. On April 11, 2000, the community design review board recommended that the city council approve
these variances and on April 17, 2000 the planning commission recommended the same.
2. The city council held a public hearing on May 8, 2000. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
E'9
council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
since:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described variances
1. Compliance with the code would cause the developer undue hardship because of the unusual
triangular- shaped lot. The lot shape makes it difficult to meet setback requirements because of its
tapered shape.
2. Approval of the building setback variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance because of the wide highway boulevard.
3. Approval of the parking lot setback variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance because only a point of the parking lot would encroach into the setback area.
4. The narrow strip of land east of the frontage road that is part of this property is not needed as part of
this development and need not be considered in the total square foot area of the site. It's omission
from the lot area, however, causes the need for the lot coverage variance.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on May 8, 2000.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - all
B. Conditional Use Permit
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following Resolution, approving a conditional use permit to build a
cabinet shop that would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district at the northeast corner of Highway 61
and County Road C. Approval is based on the findings required by the ordinance and is subject to the following
conditions:
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 055
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Conrad Solberg, of Forest Products, applied for a conditional use permit to construct a
building closer than 350 feet to property zoned for residential.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the undeveloped property at the northeast corner of Highway 61 and
County Road C. The legal description is:
THE EAST 150 FEET OF THE WEST 394.54 FEET OF THE SOUTH 316.30 FEET OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29,
RANGE 22; ALSO THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 349.31 FEET OF THE WEST 199.54 FEET AT
SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 LYING
EASTERLY OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF WHITE BEAR LAKE ROAD.
9
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On April 17, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
conditional use permit for the proposed building placement.
2. The city council held a public hearing on May 8, 2000. City staff published a notice in the paper
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone
at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports
and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional
use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with
the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - all
C. Design Approval
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the plans date - stamped March 15, 2000, for the proposed Forest
Product cabinet shop at the northeast corner of Highway 61 and County Road C. The owner shall do the
following:
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
10
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. Work should not be done with the doors open. If the dust collector system by the dock causes
excessive noise, the property owner should take steps to provide sound dampening.
5. There shall not be any outdoor storage unless the city council approves a conditional use permit for
outdoor storage.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on May 8, 2000.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - all
4. 7:30 P.M. (8:48 P.M.) Conditional Use Permit and Design Review -Fresh Paint Warehouse
(1055 Gervais Avenue)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Trippler presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Mike Trenon, 2474 Adele Street
Sherill Benjamin, 2473 Adele Street
Mike Westermeier, 2458 Adele Street
Thomas Hart, Winthrop and Weinstine, Attorney Representing the Project
Tom Schaffhausen, Sanas Capital Investments
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
A. Conditional Use Permit
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following Resolution, approving a conditional use permit for
Thomas Schaffhausen of Sanas Capital Investments to construct an office /warehouse building on the property
1055 Gervais Avenue. This request needs this permit because the new building would be closer than 350 feet to
11
a residential district. The city bases the approval on the findings required by code and is subject to the
following conditions:
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 056
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Tom Schaffhausen, of Sanas Capital Investments, applied for a conditional use permit to
build an office /warehouse facility in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district closer than 350 feet to a residential
district.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 1055 Gervais Avenue. The legal description is:
Subject to Bedell Road ( Gervais Avenue), the East 150 feet of the South 290 4/10 feet of the Southeast
1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, Maplewood, Ramsey County,
Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On April 17, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
permit.
2. The city council held a public hearing on May 8, 2000. City staff published a notice in the paper
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone
at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports
and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional
use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with
the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
12
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city date - stamped January 20, 2000,
except that the owner shall remove the garage from the site. The existing house shall be painted or
sided to match the new building.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
- permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The city council may require additional parking in the future if the council determines that there is a
need for additional parking on the site.
5. There shall be no outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, materials or supplies, except the personal
vehicles of the employees, permitted on the site.
6. Except in the event of a bona fide emergency, the applicant's commercial traffic and vehicles shall
use Gervais Avenue and the Highway 61 frontage road for access to this site. The applicant or
owner shall use all reasonable efforts to insure that commercial vehicles under its control do not use
Cypress Street for access to or from this site.
7. The normal hours of operation shall be from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday, although
the foregoing shall not prohibit employees or representatives of the applicant, owner, or its tenants
from being on the site outside the foregoing hours. Such activities and site visits shall be conducted
in a manner to avoid unnecessary noise and shall not cause a nuisance to the nearby residential
properties.
8. The lighting on the site shall be wall or post- mounted and shall shine toward the site.
9. Clean the site by removing all vehicles, unused and inoperable equipment, debris and all other
unused/unusable items.
10. If the city council allows the house to stay on the property, then the occupants of the house shall
have a direct business connection with the business on the site. In addition, the house shall not be
rented to or sold to any person or party that does not have a direct business relationship with the
business on the property. The owner shall notify city staff on any change of tenant notify and /or
request an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit if changed to commercial use.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on May 8, 2000.
13
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Collins and Koppen
Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk
Abstain - Mayor Cardinal
B. Design Approval
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the plans date - stamped January 20, 2000, for the Fresh Paint facility
at 1055 Gervais Avenue, based on the findins required by code. The property owner or applicant shall:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. Before the city issues a building permit for the new office /warehouse, complete the following:
a. Have the community design review board (CDRB) approve a screening plan for the area on the
west side of the proposed parking lot between the proposed building and the existing house. This
screening must be at least 80 percent opaque and at least six feet tall. The screening requirement
may be met with a berm, a fence, plantings or a combination of design and materials.
b. Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval.
The erosion control plan shall meet all ordinance requirements. The grading and storm water
plans shall direct all impervious surfaces (roofs, driveway and parking areas) to the south and
into a storm sewer that the developer connects to the existing city system to the west of the site.
c. Submit a building -color scheme of neutral colors to city staff for approval.
d. Get a demolition permit from the city and remove the existing garage and house. If the city
council allows the house to stay on the site, then get a demolition permit for the garage.
e. Submit a lighting plan as required by the code showing the light spread and fixture design for site
lights. The light fixtures must have concealed lenses and bulbs to properly shield glare from the
residents.
3. Complete the following before occupying the new office /warehouse building:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. Restore and seed or sod any and all disturbed ground such
as the areas of driveway or blacktop removal. Remove all old driveway entrances and restore
with sod.
c. Provide handicap - accessible parking spaces as the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act)
requires. Install ahandicap- parking sign for each handicap - parking space.
d. Screen all roof - mounted equipment visible from adjacent residential properties. Such equipment
visible on non - residential sides must be painted to match the building color. (code requirement)
e. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure if there will be any outdoor storage of refuse. The
14
enclosure must match the building in color and materials and shall have a closeable gate that is
100 percent opaque.
f. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all lawn areas on the front and on the sides of the new
office /warehouse building and on all sides of the existing house.
g. Provide site - security lighting as required by the city code. The light source, including the lens
covering the bulb, shall be concealed or shielded so not to cause any nuisance to vehicle drivers
or to adjacent property owners. There shall be no lighting on the back of the building unless
required by the building code.
h. Post the west side of the new driveway and the west side of the parking area for "no parking."
i. Install continuous concrete curb and gutter around all parking areas and the driveway.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives cash escrow for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost
of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building
is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in
e spring or summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve
minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Collins and Koppen
Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk
Abstain - Mayor Cardinal
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Hazelwood Street Improvements, City Project 99 -07
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the
report.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to adopt the following Resolution, awarding the bid for Hazelwood Street
Improvements, City Project 99 -07 to T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $609,138.41
:
RESOLUTION 00 -05 -057
15
TABULATION OF BIDS
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the officials designated for a bid opening by the
City Council of Maplewood was convened at 10 a.m., Friday, May 5, 2000. The purpose of this meeting was to
receive, open and publicly read aloud bids for construction of Hazelwood Street, Gervais Avenue to County
Road C, Project 99 -07.
Present were: Chris Cavett and Bill Priebe
Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids, the following bids were opened and read:
Bidder
Amount Bid Bond Affidavit EEO ADA
T. A. Schifsky & Sons $609,138.43 5% x x x
Dresel Contracting, Inc. 653,305.28 5% x x x
Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. 652,531.00 5% x x x
Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the city clerk referred the bids received to the city engineer
instructing him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation at the regular city council meeting of May
8, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
2. Equipment Purchase
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of
the report.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to award the purchase for the replacement mower to M.T. I. Distributing,, in
the amount of $22,347.96, and award of the purchase for the outfitting of two plow /dump trucks to Crysteel
Truck Equipment in the amount of $60,457.53. Both are through State bid pricing.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
K, NEW BUSINESS
1. Annual Neighborhood Stop Sign Requests
a Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of
the report.
16
b. Mayor Cardinal asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this
matter. The following persons were heard:
Rich Dufcket, 2321 East Montana
Todd Snell, 2496 Oak Circle
Eugene White, 1850 Radatz Avenue
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the following stop si n requests:
1. All -way stop signs be placed at the intersection of Sterling Street at Montana Circle and Montana
Avenue in the Oak Ridge Estates residential community.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Councilmember Collins moved to have Community Director Coleman review Ordinance 36.151 regarding
residential dwellings in combination with a business use and make recommendation to Council.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the following stop sign requests:
2. All -way stop signs be placed at the intersection of Sterling Street at Mary Street and Arlington
Avenue.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
2. Preliminary Approval of Fire Safety bond Issue
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
b. Finance Director Faust presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to (A) adopt the following Resolution, providing preliminary approval for the
sale of the $3,540,000 General Obligation Fire Safety Bonds and (B) schedule a special Council meeting at 5:00
p.m. on Thursday, June 8, 2000 for a bid award on the bond issue.
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 058
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATED SALE OF $3
GENERAL OBLIGATION FIRE SAFETY BONDS, SERIES 2000A
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City "), has heretofore
determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue its $3,540,000 General Obligation Fire Safety Bonds,
Series 2000A (the "Bonds ") to defray the expense of the acquisition and betterment of a fire station and fire
equipment and apparatus for the City, all as approved by the votes at the November 2, 1999, election; and
17
a. WHEREAS, the City has retained Springsted Incorporated, in Saint Paul, Minnesota
("Springsted"), as its independent financial advisor and is therefore authorized to sell these
obligations by a competitive negotiated sale in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60,
Subdivision 2(9); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, as follows:
i. Authorization The City Council hereby authorizes Springsted to solicit bids for the
competitive negotiated sale of the Bonds.
ii. Meetin ; Bid Opening This City Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the
Terms of Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A for the purpose of considering sealed bids for,
and awarding the sale of, the Bonds. The Clerk or her designee, shall open bids at the time and
place specified in such Terms of Proposal.
iii. Terms of Proposal The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the negotiation thereof
are fully set forth in the "Terms of Proposal" attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby
approved and made a part hereof.
iv. Official Statement In connection with said competitive negotiated sale, the Clerk and
other officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Springsted and
participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds, and to execute and deliver
it on behalf of the City upon its completion.
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON
ITS BEHALF, PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$3,540,000
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION FIRE SAFETY BONDS, SERIES 2000A
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY
Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Thursday, June 8, 2000, until 10:00 A.M., Central Time, at the
offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time
they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 5:00
P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
Proposals maybe submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3002 to Springsted. Signed Proposals,
without final price or coupons, maybe submitted to Springsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be
responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or
fax (651) 223 -3002 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability
0
of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each
Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds
regardless of the manner of the Proposal submitted.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated June 1, 2000, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1
and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2001. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day
year of twelve 30-day months.
The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
2002
$100
2007
$130,000
2012
$175
2017
$225,000
2003
$105
2008
$140
2013
$185,000
2018
$24000
2004
$110.
2009
$150,000
2014
$195,000
2020
$25500
2005
$120,000
2010
$155,000
2015
$205,000
2021
$265,000
2006
$125,
2011
$165,000
2016
$215,000
2022
$280,000
Proposal for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial bonds and term
bonds, provided that no serial bond may mature on or after the first mandatory sinking fund redemption date of
any term bond. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption and must conform to the
maturity schedule set forth above at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. In order to
designate term bonds, the proposal must specify "Last Year of Serial Maturities" and "Years of Term
Maturities" in the spaces provided on the Proposal Form.
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the
public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bonds, representing the aggregate principal
amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The
Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the
Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple
thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants.
Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds.
Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of
principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such
participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds,
will be required to deposit the Bonds with DTC.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the
services of the registrar.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on February 1, 2009, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1,
2010. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the City and in such manner as the
19
City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of
the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each
participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial
ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued
interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and
power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. The proceeds will be used to finance the acquisition and
betterment of a fire station, fire equipment, and apparatus for the City.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $3,540,000 (Par) and accrued interest 'on the total principal amount of the
Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in the form of a certified or
cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $35,400, payable to the order of the City. If a check
is used, it must accompany the proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance
company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must
be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must
identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are
awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit
to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by
Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award.
If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the
Deposit requirement.
The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no
interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said
amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving
proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued
to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 51100 or
1/8 of 1 %. There is no limit on the interest rate spread if quoted in ascending order; however, no rate for any
maturity shall be more than 1.0% lower than any prior rate. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate
from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC)
basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will
be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (I) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating
to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and, (iii) reject any
proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
20
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the
option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment
shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the
Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has
requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other
rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser shall
not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds.
CUSP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither
the failure to print. such numbers on any Bonds nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure
or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSP Service Bureau charge for the
assignment of CUSP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser
through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving
legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and
of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the
Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its
designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the
Bonds shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the
City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for payment.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
Pull from client specified on the date of actual issuance and delivery of the Bonds, the City will execute and
deliver a Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (the "Undertaking ") whereunder the City will covenant for the
benefit of the owners of the Bonds to provide certain financial and other information about the City and notices
of certain occurrences to information repositories as specified in and required by SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5).
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the
Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule
15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional
information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted
Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223 -3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates,
principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall
constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule
15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor,
the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost
21
to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 140 copies of the Official
Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter
of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final
Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the
Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (I) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it
shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of
assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated May 8, 2000 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
3. Charitable Gambling Requests for 2001
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of
the report.
Councilmember Collins moved to decrease the request 1 $700, increase requests 6. 8, and 9 $250 $200, and
$250 respectively, and approve 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 10 as submitted for charitable izambling funds for the year
2001. The adjusted amounts are listed below:
1.
Non Profit /501 c3 Room Rentals at the MCC
$24,300.00
2.
Mid Summer Night Celebrations (23)
18,500.00
3.
July 4th Fireworks
10,000.00
4.
National Night Out
7
5.
Red Cross Blood Drive at MCC
450.00
6.
Maplewood Law Enforcement Explorers
1,250.00
7.
Ramsey County Fair Fireworks
7
8.
Moms Club of Maplewood - North
500.00
9.
Senior Recovery Program
4
10.
Dispute Resolution
2
Total Amount Requested $75,000.00
Total Amount Available 77,955.00
Remaining Funds $ 2
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Collins and
Wasiluk
Nays - Councilmembers Allenspach and Koppen
Councilmember Collins moved to continue the Council Meeting (10:29 P.M.1.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Collins and
Wasiluk
Nays - Councilmembers Allenspach and Koppen
22
4. Intersection of 120, Joy and Halley
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Collins moved to request that the MN Department of Transportation construct a signal s, stem
at the intersection of 120. Joy and Halley as soon as possible.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
5. Maplewood Pavement Management Policy - Assessment Rate Update
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the updated assessment rates for the year 2001 construction
season as outlined in the Maplewood Pavement Management Policy.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
6. Metricom Antenna Agreement
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the antenna lease agreement with Metricom and the Nondisturbance
Agreement.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Pawn Shops and Check Cashing Shops - Councilmember Koppen moved to instruct staff to research the
Pawn Shop and Check Cashing Shop Ordinances to evaluate whether the City of Maplewood's is as
strict or more strict than the City of Saint Paul's.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
2. Commissions - Mayor Cardinal instructed staff to hang up labeled photos of Mayor, Council, and
Commission Members in the Maplewood City Hall Lobby.
3. Ed Omara - Mayor Cardinal announced it was Ed Omara's birthday and wished him a happy birthday.
Ed Omara was one of the men that incorporated the City of Maplewood.
23
4. Travel and Training Policy - Councilmember Collins requested that the travel and training policy be
reviewed at the upcoming Council/Manager Workshop on May 22, 2000.
5. Access to City Offices - Councilmember Collins stated that former City of Maplewood
employees should not be permitted to access city offices or equipment.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None
O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Cardinal moved to adi ourn the meeting at 10:40 P.M.
Seconded by no Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
Karen E. Guilfoile, City Clerk
24
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, was duly called and held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 8th day of May, 2000, at 7:00
P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Robert Cardinal
Councilmember Sherry Allenspach
Councilmember Kenneth V. Collins
Councilmember Marvin C. Koppen
Councilmember Julie A. Wasiluk
Councilmember Koppen moved to Al adopt the following solution, providing_preliminary pproval for the
sale of the $3,540,000 General Obligation Fire Safety Bonds and (B) schedule a special Council meeting at 5:00
p.m. on Thursday, June 8, 2000 for a bid award on the bond issue.
RESOLUTION 00 - 05 - 058
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATED SALE OF $3
GENERAL OBLIGATION FIRE SAFETY BONDS, SERIES 2000A
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City "), has heretofore
determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue its $3,540,000 General Obligation Fire Safety Bonds,
Series 2000A (the "Bonds ") to defray the expense of the acquisition and betterment of a fire station and fire
equipment and apparatus for the City, all as approved by the votes at the November 2, 1999, election; and
a. WHEREAS, the City has retained Springsted Incorporated, in Saint Paul, Minnesota
("Springsted"), as its independent financial advisor and is therefore authorized to sell these
obligations by a competitive negotiated sale in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section
475.60, Subdivision 2(9); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
i. Authorization The City Council hereby authorizes Springsted to solicit bids for
the competitive negotiated sale of the Bonds.
ii. Meeting; Bid Opening This City Council shall meet at the time and place
specified in the Terms of Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A for the purpose of
considering sealed bids for, and awarding the sale of, the Bonds. The Clerk or her
designee, shall open bids at the time and place specified in such Terms of Proposal.
Terms of Proposal The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the negotiation
thereof are fully set forth in the "Terms of Proposal" attached hereto as Exhibit A and
hereby approved and made a part hereof.
AGENDA OEM NO...E 2
MEMORANDUM
Action by Council
TO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager
FROM: Colleen Callahan Date
SUBJECT: Resolution of Appreciation for Regina Lar che- Theune Endorsed
DATE: May 22, 2000 Modified
Rejected
INTRODUCTION
Regina Laroche - Theune resigned from the Human Relations Commission Board on May 2, 2000.
Refer to her letter on page 2. Attached please find a resolution of appreciation for Regina. Regina
g g
served on the Maplewood Human Relations Commission Board for five years from March 27,
1995 to May 2, 2000. Regina has graciously volunteered to continue helping with special projects
until she moves out of state.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached resolution.
Regina M. Laroche - Theune
1781 Gulden Place
Maplewood, MN 55109
May 2, 2000
Maplewood Human Relations Commission
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
To the City of Maplewood and the Human Relations Commission:
After several years of having the pleasure of volunteering with the
Maplewood Human .Relations Commission I now submit my
resignation. My family and I are moving out of state this summer.
I leave grateful for the lessons in, and opportunities for, serving the
community.
Sincerely,
Regina M. Laroche - Theune
'e a �.
'' ► e o e ° e
_ JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
r � a t •- . t: _ .�tr� . see
� ib. •
Regina Laroche - Theune has been m
g a ember of the Maplewood Human
WHEREAS Re
Relations Commission Board since March 2 $ °r. `a►:
'- 7, 1995 and has served faithfully mthat capacity,,
and a �•Z_• �� ; e ; e ; �
-
i d ° °O° •° ,`eoee a
WHEREAS the Human Relations Commission Board has a reciated here exper i ence
r
pp xpe
!
insights and ood ud ement; and
g J g
WHEREAS; Re ina has freel g iven of hct• time and energy without compensation'
g y g gy, p _:.
for the betterment of h i = ::: �►.:
of t he Cit of Maplewood and
WHEREAS Regina has shown' dedication: to her duties and has `consistent) °
contributed her leadership nd effort f. h =
p or the benefit of the City. � ; :- e•' -= . =: --
�• _ .. •-�°, r je'.�
NII��t°
. - - .. - - ?► . r.. •' - mss%
e
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of
MaplewoodVhnnesota and its citizens that Regina Laroche - Theune is hereby ,exten our 10,
gratitude and appreciation for her dedicated service and we wish her continued success m the
O OB�� •. ., CO .01,
-
•
ee
Passed by the Maplewood :: _ • �- s
City Council on :eeoe•;•:
. p C • •ss i . e e�� `.
M. Q �� �rir ° ®ee' ,.`•ems, 'C�� .
��'., ?Q `„i,?"r''�r�: m i �. sue`;
e
r @ y Q nOr • ' \j � � ° � -3��� Sao' °o
t : at �I� fir: ,` m °
° s ° bw
No
Q •iii `!� �` es is /e °R° � �,;' .
�fi r •�
Robert Cardinal, Mayor
r •oe•
s
4 Passed by the Human
i �Z oea �.•
Q °p1 ' A zi i
Relations Commission
b d ear x . -ss =•�`:. ®;
a Board on
Q /I'.re•r�0• -! ° j • y Ol Vii.
:•Oe!
Donna Brown Chair
. t of ...mss• 'Y ?? ae e.!•.
Attest
; ' � - i► a .w °a• �; ^w= «_« °` ene +o °
r
Karen Guilfoile City Clerk
RE
•
s ,e
°
s
t• a r.
a�a�+8+d +8 +• its ® +� +d +e +9 +® +et•�, +• e8o�+�e0o�+8B •ed +pm • +�o�oe +8 +� a +ale +e+e+ a46 +.i� +fib ,, e +a +• �ne9+89'e +doti+� +�1 +� +• •f�,�fe +geeaeegl�ee +e +eee +�o• , a +AQesddS +B+9 +8e�ae +6+x+9 +a4b •e6`G +e+ddm +9e �e��+i5 +e4e+a \,y eo � ®�•! ,�a• : = - -`.
I/r.. .ir a_•1'i:. • \\ •aarabee; :rlf: "A1.•.. .�\ :..•ua:'eb� y ./ • ♦.' •rai..' ./ ♦, a w e: ,;••. -e sv' ••\ •.Oa .u`.• -•..• _ .r ♦♦.`.:, �ro•r e' �` ♦ e,�
.1/// \0 \ w��r I / , \ \ \' _ s•: . / /I'�'.:a•n- Vie•;..' •: \ \ \. :•so a��,'. r \. aam •' I %:' . +t•...: '. :\\
rI / • fr It' \ \. .// / i'tr rt '• v \ \. a ! / . f. rr • \ \ \ \. ae' r s ✓A \ \: br '. / %/I ,. , .: a \�` •rs `%4 i tr 'i \ \\ <re I/ i t• rl '. i0. .• =mss •
ups 0 1 r� t \t. - ./ t 1 ,O t t \. .r a // t t � 1 v,a. .: /w\\ v1 rs i• 8 k v\\� .r a S� i 8 q'% �\ \, w:lS% iii 1 1 7 ��\• _ate::;:: a ®. °
:3'. a {{ p r • N,,a. .t:; 1 If f 1 1 Z� ..�,' ' - �i /„ ♦ \., r- /L -.
1 ! ° !r,`�v..t;: - / �, i fi f ell l,:a.••r;; �; tf S t' _ :i.
,_ ... - .._ ._...... .... 1 ,., : ?'••. rl 1 'f •.? ..• !;Ilp� g101ji.�.,::. _ °__ >a.'_:•m•s,.
wan _ ..m..ri_t0.rr o.if. L. �.. - _ �.t. °I..t e.0..fns s I.el.. n.Ir. L. s.` •_ i .
AGENDA NO. G -1
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 12, 2000
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modred
Rejected
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$108,085.69
$251,913.50
$ 147,767.62
$2,521.50
$112,248.09
$122,609.23
Checks #8289 thru #8300 dated 5 -1 thru 5 -5 -00
Checks #49550 thru #49654 dated 5 -9 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 5 -2 thru 5 -8 -00
Checks #8301 thru #8304 dated 5 -9 thru 5 -12 -00
Checks #49657 thru #49751 dated 5 -16 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 5 -9 thru 5 -15 -00
$745,145.63 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$304,306.83 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 5 -12 -00
$24,629.05 Payroll Deduction check #78543 thru #78550 dated 5 -12 -00
$328,935.88 Total Payroll
$1,074,081.51 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions
on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if
necessary.
hu
Attachments
C:\OFFICE\WP-DOCS\AGENDA\APCLOO12.MAY
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 1
05/05/00
08:31
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
8289
05/01/00
330680
HEALTHPARTNERS
MAY 2000
5,610.97
MAY 2000
20,843.88
MAY 2000
4,246.73
30,701.58
8290
05/01/00
530100
MEDICA CHOICE
MAY 2000
5,200.68
MAY 2000
26,394.73
MAY 2000
2,890.38
34,485.79
8291
05/01/00
551100
MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
MAY 2000
344.38
MAY 2000
1,160.94
MAY 2000
1,008.88
MAY 2000
64.26
2,578.46
8292
05/01/00
110870
CBSA
MAY 2000
523.60
523.60
8293
05/01/00
280200
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO.
MAY 2000
2
2,052.14
8294
05/01/00
871400
TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT
DARE NIGHT ENTERTAINMENT
200.00
200.00
8295
05/01/00
320634
GUNDERSON CONSTRUCTION INC
CONSULTING BOARDWALK
450.00
450.00
8296
05/01/00
943500
WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVENUE
WISC SWT - APRIL 2000
949.02
949.02
8297
05/01/00
712103
PIZZA FACTORY
DARE GRADUATION PIZZA
550.00
550.00
8298
05/02/00
722200
P.E.R.A.
4 -28 -00 P/R
15,026.57
4 -28 -00 P/R
18,989.53
34
8299
05/02/00
712103
PIZZA FACTORY
DARE GRADUATION PIZZAS
300.00
300.00
8300
05/05/00
190400
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE
1,279.00
1
49550
05/09/00
BLUE CROSS /BLUE SHIELD
REFUND - R SNODEGAR 00001229
728.20
728.20
49551
05/09/00
TWIN CITY PIPE TRADES
REFUND -P MUNKELWITZ 00001813
712.71
712.71
49552
05/09/00
SCOTT SCHLOESSER
REF- 453 LARPENTEUR AVE #19181
1
REF- 453 LARPENTEUR AVE #19181
25.07
1,025.07
49553
05/09/00
UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS
REFUND - SEC DEPOSIT
250.00
250.00
49554
05/09/00
SUSAN VERMILYEA
REFUND - SOFTBALL
40.00
40.00
49555
05/09/00
PATRICIA MCBRIDE
REFUND - GARDEN PLOTS
27.00
27.00
49556
05/09/00
ACHIEVEMENT PLUS EXTENDED DAY
REFUND - GROUP
2.75
2.75
49557
05/09/00
ARCADE - PHALEN POST NO 577
REFUND - GAMBLING LIC
50.00
50.00
49558
05/09/00
ARLINE MULLIN
REFUND - INS 00002265
278.85
278.85
1
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 2
05/05/00
08:31
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
49559
05/09/00
010095
A -I HYDRAULICS SALES
SPUD OUT
54.10
54.10
49560
05/09/00
010200
AAA ALL CITY VACUUM
VACUUM REPAIR
64.38
VACUUM REPAIR
42.72
107.10
49561
05/09/00
010467
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
CELL PHONE CHARGES
108.97
CELL PHONE CHARGES
11.52
MNTHLY CELL CHARGES
86.70
207.19
49562
05/09/00
010575
ACE HARDWARE
MISC HARDWARE
11.48
11.48
49563
05/09/00
010700
ADAM'S PEST CONTROL, INC.
QUARTERLY SERVICE
133.13
QUARTERLY SERVICE
207.69
340.82
49564
05/09/00
020005
ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC.
SIGNS & SIGNALS
1
1,437.64
49565
05/09/00
020411
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE
CELL PHONE 3/20 TO 4/21/00
55.22
CELL CHARGES PWC
30.78
CELL CHARGES STREET
30.78
CELL CHARGES UTIL
30.78
CELL PHONE
9.81
CELL PHONE BILLS
19.15
SQUAD CELL PHONES
339.55
CELL PHONE
6.21
CELL PHONE
1,142.12
CELL PHONE
43.05
1,707.45
49566
05/09/00
020900
ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC
RELOCATE AC /HTG SENSOR PW BLDG
493.00
493.00
49567
05/09/00
021650
AMUNDSEN, SHIRLEY
PURCHASE ARTWORK FOR CITY HALL
150.00
150.00
49568
05/09/00
030420
ANDERSON, EVERETT A
MILEAGE
27.72
27.72
49569
05/09/00
030660
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
PATROL /BOARDING FEES
756.34
756.34
49570
05/09/00
061605
BARREL MAN
55 GAL DRUMS
665.62
665.62
49571
05/09/00
061990
BAY FIREWORKS, INC.
DEPOSIT FOR FIREWORKS
3
3
49572
05/09/00
080925
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
MONTHLY WATER UTILITIES
51.83
MONTHLY WATER UTILITIES
26.76
MONTHLY WATER UTILITIES
14.75
MONTHLY WATER UTILITIES
702.26
795.60
49573
05/09/00
091660
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.
66.66 TONS MINUS CL5
402.53
402.53
49574
05/09/00
120515
CENTRAL STORES
M70336 - OFFICE SUPPLIES
151.58
151.58
49575
05/09/00
131710
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BRACKETS
1
1
49576
05/09/00
140700
COLEMAN, MELINDA
MANAGEMENT SEMINAR /SNACKS
29.47
29.47
2
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/05/00 08:31 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
49577
05/09/00
151830
CONNEY SAFTEY PRODUCTS
SHIPPING CHARGE
8.78
49578
05/09/00
170250
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS, INC.
1500 GPM PUMPER
59 1 000.00
49579
05/09/00
180800
DALCO
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
477.95
49580
05/09/00
180985
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO.
AC CHARGE CORD
25.39
49581
05/09/00
190501
DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL RELEASE
25.00
49582
05/09/00
220200
DYNA MED
MEDIC BAG
72.65
EM PACK CASE /FLOWMETER
186.77
SPRAGUE RAPPAPORT COMB BP KIT
189.37
MEDIC BAG
68.98
49583
05/09/00
231525
EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
PROJ MGMT INFORUM GOLD
750.00
PROJ MGMT INFORUM GOLD
250.00
49584
05/09/00
240375
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
REPAIR TO T4
152.10
49585
05/09/00
250178
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA
LUNCH /TRAINING
16.00
49586
05/09/00
260289
FARIBAULT, CITY OF
REGIS /M OSTROM & N CARVER
55.00
49587
05/09/00
280110
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC.
SHIPPING /HANDLING
2.44
49588
05/09/00
300500
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
44.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
44.54
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
12.27
FEES FOR SERVICE
42.33
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
78.19
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
77.23
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
39.78
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
7.30
MATS
27.00
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
20.28
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
24.51
49589
05/09/00
320265
GRAFIX SHOPPE
DECALS FOR NEW SCBA
404.20
STRIPES FOR SQD 960
345.93
49590
05/09/00
320300
GREEN VALUE NURSERY
GYPSUM
53.60
49591
05/09/00
340110
HEJNY RENTALS, INC
BUNNY SUIT
51.59
HYDRAULIC HAMMER RENTAL
143.29
49592
05/09/00
340601
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
FIRE FIGHTER 1/2 R SMITH
558.80
49593
05/09/00
350700
HIRSHFIELDS
PAINT /SUPPLIES
41.06
PAINT /SUPPLIES
50.79
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
8.78
59,000.00
477.95
25.39
25.00
517.77
1,000.00
152.10
16.00
55.00
2.44
423.02
750.13
53.60
194.88
558.80
91.85
3
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 4
05/05/00
08:31
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
49594
05/09/00
351300
HORSNELL, JUDITH
MILEAGE
13.13
13.13
49595
05/09/00
351320
HORWATH, THOMAS
TREE INSPECTIONS
810.00
810.00
49596
05/09/00
390105
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #623
REPLACED CHAIRS
760.00
760.00
49597
05/09/00
401420
JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA
HANDICAP DOOR REPAIR
289.57
289.57
49598
05/09/00
450120
L.M.C.I.T.
4TH QTR INS 4/00 -6/00
2,390.00
4TH QTR INS 4/00 -6/00
4,402.25
4TH QTR INS 4/00 -6/00
28,827.75
4TH QTR INS 4/00 -6/00
874.84
4TH QTR INS 4/00 -6/00
1
38,244.50
49599
05/09/00
450185
LABOR ALL
CUSTODIAL SERVICES
308.88
CUSTODIAL SERVICES
102.96
411.84
49600
05/09/00
450491
LANIER WORLDWIDE
TRANSCRIPTION MACHINE REPAIR
115.33
115.33
49601
05/09/00
500651
M.R.P.A.
AQUATIC CONF - MOORE
175.00
AQUATIC CONF - CROSSEN
100.00
275.00
49602
05/09/00
500800
M.T.I. DISTRIBUTING CO.
CASTOR WHEEL
173.77
173.77
49603
05/09/00
501585
MAIN STREET ELECTRIC
REPAIR & MAINT/BUILDINGS
711.50
711.50
49604
05/09/00
510500
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
BIRTHDAY CAKES
186.25
186.25
49605
05/09/00
510850
MAPLEWOOD REVIEW
SUBSCRIPTION-MAPLEWOOD NAT CTR
17.95
17.95
49606
05/09/00
530560
MERIT CHEVROLET
ACCIDENT RELATED DAMAGE
1
1
49607
05/09/00
530730
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
SOCCER NETS
325.70
325.70
49608 . 05/09/00
540770
MINNCOMM PAGING
PAGER
232.08
232.08
49609
05/09/00
542200
3M
SIGNS & SIGNALS
4,959.02
SIGNS & SIGNALS
479.85
SIGNS & SIGNALS
189.59
SIGNS & SIGNALS
1
SIGNS & SIGNALS
254.19
PAVEMENT MARKING MATERIALS
1,440.05
SIGNS & SIGNALS
254.19
8,779.71
49610
05/09/00
542345
MINNESOTA PHOTO
DEVELOP FILM
3.78
3.78
49611
05/09/00
570090
MOGREN BROS.
DIRT /GRASS SEED
306.72
306.72
49612
05/09/00
630050
N.R.P.A.
MEMBERSHIP
350.00
350.00
49613
05/09/00
630056
NSPAA
REG - 3 SOFTBALL TEAMS
825.00
825.00
4
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
05/05/00
08:31
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
49614
05/09/00
630210
NARDINI FIRE EQUIP. CO., INC.
RECHARGE FIRE EXT
42.60
49615
05/09/00
640550
NELSON, JEAN
MILEAGE
58.94
49616
05/09/00
660180
NORTH METRO AUTOMOTIVE
REPAIR TO VEHICLE
730.93
49617
05/09/00
670950
NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC
CITY NEWSLETTER - MAY
1
49618
05/09/00
681151
OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
39.39
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
67.07
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
30.84
49619
05/09/00
690340
OLSON, ARNOLD G
MILEAGE
51.24
49620
05/09/00
692800
OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, INC.
TANK RENTAL 1/31/00
4.50
TANK RENTAL 4/30/00
4.50
OXYGEN /ACETYLENE
34.90
GAS /WIRE
47.01
TANK RENTAL - 3/31/00
4.50
TANK RENTAL 12/31/99
4.50
49621
05/09/00
710250
PECK, DENNIS
MILEAGE
5.60
DOCUMENTS FROM RAMCO
2.00
49622
05/09/00
720595
POST BOARD
LIC RENEWALS POLICE OFF N -Z
180.00
LIC RENEWALS POLICE OFF N -Z
1,260.00
49623
05/09/00
720600
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR JOY MEETING
153.90
49624
05/09/00
740320
RDJ SPECIALTIES, INC.
CHILD HATS
438.52
CHILD HATS
26.77-
49625
05/09/00
740690
RAAEN, BARB
FILM DEV
21.04
49626
05/09/00
741600
RAMSEY COUNTY-PRRREV
1ST QTR RADIO SERVICE
45,904.86
1ST QTR RADIO SERVICE
1,335.25-
49627
05/09/00
742155
RAMSEY CTY PROPERTY RECORDS
AFTON PARK
37.21
JOY PARK
37.21
HAZELWOOD PARK
37.21
SUNSET RIDGE PARK
703.70
HAZELWOOD FIRE STAT
37.21
FOUR SEASONS PARK
240.14
E CO LINE FIRE 2
37.21
WATER BOOSTER STATION
37.21
APPLEWOOD PARK
39.71
PUBLIC WORKS BLDG
240.14
PARK MAINT BUILDING
37.21
COMMUNITY CENTER
240.14
CITY HALL
240.14
GLADSTONE FIRE STATION
37.21
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
42.60
58.94
730.93
1,310.24
137.30
51.24
99.91
7.60
1,440.00
153.90
411.75
21.04
44,569.61
5
VOUCHRE2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 6
05/05/00
08:31
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
WAKEFIELD PARK
37.21
GOODRICH PARK
37.21
EDGERTON PARK
37.21
PARKSIDE FIRE STATION
37.21
EAST CTY LINE FIRE DEPT
240.14
GOODRICH SHELTER PARK
37.21
2
49628
05/09/00
" 750550
REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS MDSE. FOR RESALE
391.46
MDSE. FOR RESALE
254.86
646.32
49629
05/09/00
751390
RICKETSON, BRENT L
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
31.95
31.95
49630
05/09/00
761300
ROADRUNNER
#6575 TO SPRINGSTED
13.75
13.75
49631
05/09/00
762205
ROSSINI, DR. JAMES
FITNESS CONSULTANT
100.00
100.00
49632
05/09/00
770800
RYCO SUPPLY CO.
PAPER TOWELS
25.67
25.67
49633
05/09/00
780300
S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS
INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE
14.89
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
117.55
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
114.98
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
2.50
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
169.72
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
19.89
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
58.63
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
54.36
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
47.89
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
104.79
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
8.69
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
19.46
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
3.33
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
200.84
2 GUEST CHAIRS
182.75
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
326.41
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
23.03
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
57.51
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
7.53
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
211.51
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
66.95
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
97.60
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
398.51
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
31.64
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
16.68
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
63.83
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
33.37 -
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
47.89 -
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
34.37 -
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
7.53 -
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
97.60-
2,200.71
49634
05/09/00
780350
S.E.H.
NEW FIRE STATION DESIGN
21,190.00
21,190.00
6
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 7
05/05/00
08:31
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
49635
05/09/00
780600
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
19.64
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
173.96
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
276.58
MDSE. FOR RESALE
122.90
USE FOR RESALE -SALES TAX N/A
121.27
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
105.07
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
136.19
MDSE. FOR'RESALE
252.43
USE FOR RESALE-SALES TAX N/A
276.15
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
134.02
LC000320
.62
LC000420
.93
CREDIT REF 00041103
.32-
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
27.00
MDSE. FOR RESALE
207.81
1
49636
05/09/00
810500
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
25.37
25.37
49637
05/09/00
840403
ST. PAUL, CITY OF
MEDIC SUPPLIES
517.96
517.96
49638
05/09/00
843575
STREICHER'S
LIGHTS FOR MARSHALL 1 CAR
2
2
49639
05/09/00
850365
SUNBERG COMPANY
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
12.14
12.14
49640
05/09/00
850600
SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
FUEL & OIL
245.83
FUEL & OIL
27.96
273.79
49641
05/09/00
850672
SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MFG. CO.
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
291.83
291.83
49642
05/09/00
860080
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
2
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
129.83
3
49643
05/09/00
860630
TALIANO'S
LUNCH - TRAINING
290.00
290.00
49644
05/09/00
860650
TARGET STORES -CSA A/R
BATTERIES
24.09
PICTURE FRAMES
42.58
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
19.67
BATTERIES
77.89
164.23
49645
05/09/00
861617
THE ECONOMICS PRESS, INC.
FIRST RATE CUSTOMER SRV
63.70
63.70
49646
05/09/00
861618
THE ENGRAVING SHOP
PLAQUE
15.00
15.00
49647
05/09/00
871600
TOUSLEY FORD, INC.
REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE
2
2
49648
05/09/00
880436
TRANSIT SERVICES
TROLLEY RENTAL
379.50
379.50
49649
05/09/00
882000
TWIN CITY SAW & SERVICE CO
REPAIR TO SAW
32.61
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
21.94
54.55
49650
05/09/00
910500
VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL
TRASH REMOVAL - MAY
336.92
7
VOUCHRE2
05/05/00 08:31
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
49651
05/09/00
977350
VIKING
ELECTRIC SUPPLY
49652
05/09/00
931300
WALSH,
WILLIAM P.
49653 05/09/00 931860 WASTE MANAGEMENT
49654 05/09/00 960450 XEROX CORPORATION
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TRASH REMOVAL - MAY
TRASH REMOVAL - MAY
MAPLEWOOD SPRING CLEAN UP 2000
LAM FOR STAT 4
COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
: COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
WASTE REMOVAL - MAY 2000
WASTE REMOVAL - JAN 2000
GOODRIDGE PARK /MAY 2000
HARVEST PARK - MAY 2000
AFTON PARK - MAY 2000
WAKEFIELD PARK - MAY 2000
1/24 - 2/23/00 XEROX COSTS
1/24 -2/23/00 XEROX COSTS
1/24 - 2/23/00 XEROX COSTS
1/24 - 2/23/00 XEROX COSTS
TOTAL CHECKS
PAGE 8
ITEM
CHECK
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
242.35
537.94
27,844.08
28,961.29
87.22
87.22
1,128.60
1,410.75
1
1
161.80
157.95
189.43
167.22
167.22
160.89
1
13.08
159.04
54.99
70.16
297.27
359,999.19
1�
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pa ee
Description
Amount
05/01/00
05/02/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
559.25
05/01/00
05/02/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
22,957.50
05/01/00
05/02/00
MN State Treasurer
State Payroll Tax
20,244.37
04/28/00
05/02/00
CBSA
Dental fees
2
05/02/00
05/03/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
747.50
05/02/00
05/03/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
27,842.08
04/28/00
05/03/00
Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items
4
05/03/00
- 05/04/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
573.00
05/03/00
05/04/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
26,369.85
05/04/00
05/05/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
743.25
05/04/00
05/05/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
20
05/05/00
05/08/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
731.75
05/05/00
05/08/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
20
TOTAL
147, 767.62
VOUCHRE2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/12/00 10:37
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
PAGE 1
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
8301
05/09/00
540890
MINN. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
INSPECTION DECAL
40.00
40.00
8302
05/10/00
820301
SKITS OUTREACH SERVICES INC
DARE PROGRAM
717.50
717.50
8304
05/12/00
190400
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE
1,764.00
1,764.00
49657
05/16/00
ROBERT PETERSON
REFUND - 1199 CENTURY AVE S
1
REFUND'- 1199 CENTURY AVE S
36.71
1
49658
05/16/00
MARIDEE WITTL
REFUND - BIRTHDAY PARTY
75.35
75.35
49659
05/16/00
SUSAN HAU
REFUND - BIRTHDAY PARTY
20.00
20.00
49660
05/16/00
DEBBIE SHEPLER
REFUND - BIRTHDAY PARTY
5.75
5.75
49661
05/16/00
BRUCE NELSON PLMG & HTG SRV
REFUND - PLMBG PRMT 00 -00684
30.00
REFUND - PLMBG PRMT 00 -00684
.50
30.50
49662
05/16/00
GRAYHAWK BUILDERS
REFUND - BLDG PRMT 00 -00751
50.00
REFUND - BLDG PRMT 00 -00751
.50
50.50
49663
05/16/00
GEORGE POLLMAN
REFUND TO PATIENT - 00001333
267.55
267.55
49664
05/16/00
010575
ACE HARDWARE
MISC MAINT MATERIALS
297.11
BOLTS
9.20
MISC. SUPPLIES
494.48
MISC SUPPLIES
177.14
977.93
49665
05/16/00
010644
ACTION PLUMBING & HEATING
REPLACE BROKEN WALL HUNG WATER
676.11
676.11
49666
05/16/00
020005
ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC.
FIRE MARSHALL DECALS
47.93
47.93
49667
05/16/00
020150
AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS
CELL PHONE
136.50
136.50
49668
05/16/00
020870
ALLIED MEDICAL ACCTS CONTROL
AMT DUE FOR PRE - COLLECT
14.00
14.00
49669
05/16/00
021415
AMERICAN PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
ECOLOGY OF URBAN SOILS REG
399.00
399.00
49670
05/16/00
030640
ANDON INC.
HELIUM TANK
8.52
8.52
49671
05/16/00
030660
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
PATROL /BOARDING FEES
905.66
905.66
49672
05/16/00
041500
ASPEN MILLS
PANTS -12/99
294.00
PANTS - 12/99
101.00
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
141.50
SHIRTS /PATCH
55.00
BUGLES
49.84
641.34
49673
05/16/00
061100
BANNIGAN & KELLY P.A.
PROSECUTION FEES THRU 4/30/00
5,250.00
5,250.00
49674
05/16/00
061700
BATTERIES PLUS
BATTERY
10.64
10.64
10
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2
05/12/00 10:37 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
49675
05/16/00
090795
BROCK WHITE COMPANY, LLC.
ROLL FILTER BLANKET /SEAL
49676
05/16/00
110150
C-S-Ci CREDIT SERVICES
FEES FOR SERVICE
49677
05/16/00
110280
CAMAS INC.
CLASS III RIPRAP
49678
05/16/00
131710
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT
AV2000 SEAL /FACEPIECE /HOLDERS
SMOKE TEST KIT
49679
_.:05/16/00
131755
CLOSE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
WHITE BEAR AVE
WHITE BEAR AVE
49680
05/16/00
151800
CONCRETE FORM ENGINEERS INC
CURB FORMS
49681
05/16/00
151855
CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE
ADV FOR BID - PROJ 99 -07
49682
05/16/00
170200
CUB FOODS- MAPLEWOOD EAST
WATER /COOLER
49683
05/16/00
170900
D & D TOWING SERVICE INC.
TOW SQUAD
TOW FORFEITURE VEH
TOW SQUAD
TOW SQUAD
49684
05/16/00
180100
DCA, INC.
FILING 5500 FORM FEES
49685
05/16/00
180390
- DADCO FOOD PRODUCTS
MDSE. FOR RESALE
49686
05/16/00
180985
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO.
STREAMLIGHT BATTERY
49687
05/16/00
190070
DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SRVS
DUPLICATING COSTS
DUPLICATING COSTS
49688
05/16/00
190100
DEGE'S GARDEN CENTER
FERTILIZER /RYE
49689
05/16/00
190400
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PUMP BACK PACK
49690
05/16/00
200500
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS
PAINT SUPPLIES
PAINT SUPPLIES
PAINT SUPPLIES
49691
05/16/00
240375
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
FRONT SPRINGS
REPAIR RIGHT /FRONT STROBE
49692
05/16/00
270189
FLEMING, KATHY
SUPPLIES FOR THEATER
49693
05/16/00
280840
FRASER, JOHN
LUNCH /DARE ROLE MODELS
49694
05/16/00
280960
FREEDOM #65
CAR WASHES
CAR WASHES
49695
05/16/00
280970
FRONTIER PRO SHOP
WALLEYBALL NETS
ITEM
AMOUNT
430.22
50.00
279.80
841.00
59.00
2,789.50
115.74
53.50
251.10
69.04
53.25
69.23
53.25
53.25
250.00
80.40
251.87
403.87
100.97
20.18
362.03
105.12
8.57
105.12
750.75
50.74
40.60
37.38
48.00
18.00
135.62
CHECK
AMOUNT
430.22
50.00
279.80
900.00
2,905.24
53.50
251.10
69.04
228.98
250.00
80.40
251.87
504.84
20.18
362.03
218.81
801.49
40.60
37.38
66.00
11
VOUCHRE2
05/12/00 10:37
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
49696 05/16/00 300500 G & K SERVICES
49697
05/16/00
301705
GERVAIS JR., CLARENCE
49698
:05/16/00
310230
GOODIN COMPANY
49699
05/16/00
320265
GRAFIX SHOPPE
49700
05/16/00
330690
HEALTH PARTNERS
49701
05/16/00
350700
HIRSHFIELDS
49702
05/16/00
350940
HOME DEPOT /GECF
49703 05/16/00 380820 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
49704
05/16/00
391395
INTOXIMETERS
49705
05/16/00
401670
JOLLY TYME FAVORS
49706
05/16/00
450120
L.M.C.I.T.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
WHISTLES
FOLDING SPORTS GOALS
NETS /WHISTLES /SPORT GOALS
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
MATS
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
MATS
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
MATS
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
TOTE FOR FIRE MARSHAL CAR
GASKET
STRIPES SQD 950
REFLECTIVE NUMBERS
MEDIC DRUGS /SUPPLIES
EMT POCKET BINDERS
SHEEP LAB
PAINT /SUPPLIES
SPRAYER /DISCHARD KIT /WD -40
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
SMALL TOOLS
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
REPAIR FAX
COPIER LEASE
COPIER LEASE
PBT MOUTHPIECES
CLIPS /RIBBON
INSURANCE CLAIM DEDUCTIBLES
INSURANCE CLAIM DEDUCTIBLES
INSURANCE CLAIM DEDUCTIBLES
ITEM
AMOUNT
15.98
88.76
13.72-
7.30
27.00
20.28
45.65
45.89
68.40
47.49
77.23
39.78
7.30
27.00
20.28
85.20
24.51
27.67
5.43
189.11
33.80
93.27
30.00
63.00
97.43
183.90
15.17
189.42
89.90
131.77
167.11
41.78
218.80
94.70
406.01
22,609.60
166.54
49707 05/16/00 450140 L.T.G. POWER EQUIPMENT CARTRIDGE 31.35
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
226.64
543.31
27.67
5.43
222.91
186.27
97.43
478.39
340.66
218.80
94.70
23,182.15
31.35
12
VOUCHRE2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/12/00 10:37
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
PAGE 4
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
49708 05/16/00
500427
M.G.F.O.A.
INVESTMENT & BANKING SEMINAR
35.00
35.00
49709
05/16/00
500651
M.R.P.A.
123 SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTRATION
2
MRPA MEMBERSHIP DUES 2000
48.00
2,262.00
49710
05/16/00
501225
MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT
TOW BAR BUSHING
21.09
21.09
49711
05/16/00
510500
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
BIRTHDAY CAKES
151.25
151.25
49712
- 05/16/00
511800
MAXFIELD'RESEARCH INC.
RESEARCH /CONSULTING WBA CORR
10
10 100.00
49713
05/16/00
530500
MENARDS
PAINT /PAINT THINNER
15.25
15.25
49714
05/16/00
531850
MYERS TIRE
ADAPTER /COVER
477.97
477.97
49715
05/16/00
541440
MINN. STATE TREASURER STAX
MONTHLY SURTAX - APRIL 2000
632.20
MONTHLY SURTAX - APRIL 2000
25.00-
607.20
49716
05/16/00
542325
MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PREEMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
712.50
712.50
49717
05/16/00
542345
MINNESOTA PHOTO
DEVELOP FILM
6.28
PHOTO DEVELOPING
10.52
PHOTO DEVELOPING
3.46
FILM PROCESSING
5.74
26.00
49718
05/16/00
542680
MINUTEMAN PRESS- MAPLEWOOD
INCIDENT/DRILL REPORTS
138.67
138.67
49719
05/16/00
630638
NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE
14 PKS - PASSPORT FILM
452.51
452.51
49720
05/16/00
660040
NORM'S TIRE SALES INC.
NEW TIRE FOR V3
122.33
122.33
49721
05/16/00
660900
NORTH STAR TURF, INC.
HOT ORANGE PAINT
125.67
125.67
49722
05/16/00
661755
NORTHERN STATES POWER
MONTHLY UTIL - GRP BILL 5/3/00
43.65
MONTHLY UTIL - GRP BILL 5/3/00
6,551.96
MONTHLY UTIL - GRP BILL 5/3/00
2
MONTHLY UTIL - GRP BILL 5/3/00
12,528.17
MONTHLY UTIL - GRP BILL 5/3/00
1,225.79
MONTHLY UTIL - GRP BILL 5/3/00
302.85
MONTHLY UTIL - GRP BILL 5/3/00
1
MONTHLY UTIL - GRP BILL 5/3/00
12,568.37
37,594.35
49723
05/16/00
680505
OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER
CONCRETE
210.87
210.87
49724
05/16/00
690340
OLSON, ARNOLD G
PLAN REVIEWER /CODE CONS
560.00
560.00
49725
05/16/00
700664
PAGENET
MO SERVICE
4.63
MO SERVICE
59.23
63.86
49726
05/16/00
700800
PAPER WAREHOUSE, INC.
RIBBON /PLACEMATS /BALLOONS
110.96
110.96
13
VOUCHRE2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/12/00 10:37
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
PAGE 5
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
CHECK
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
49727
05/16/00
711400
PETSMART
FISH FOOD /FILTER /DETOXIFIER
48.63
48.63
49728
05/16/00
720600
POSTMASTER
POSTCARDS FOR MSNC
3 1 000.00
3000.00
,
49729
05/16/00
720763
PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION
WRISTBANDS
66.57
WRISTBANDS
4.07-
62.50
49730
05/16/00'
722300
PUMP AND METER SERVICE, INC.
RESET TIME /DT /YR TANK MONITOR+
112.66
112.66
49731`:05/16/00
741150
RAH SPORTS
BLACK MAXBACK /DECK SHORT
438.20
438.20
49732
05/16/00
741201
RAINBOW FOODS
COOKIES /SODA DARE 5TH GRADE
34.96
COOKIES
13.06
48.02
49733
05/16/00
742127
RAMSEY.CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE
2000 DUES /WINGER & RYAN
20.00
20.00
49734
05/16/00
751450
RITZ CAMERA
DEV /PHOTOS TO SLIDE
82.31
82.31
49735
05/16/00
780300
S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
37.85
CHAIR /TABLE
712.49
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
18.88
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
17.97
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
422.18
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
1.62
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
173.97
RETURNED - FILE R -DEX
104.30-
1,280.66
49736
05/16/00
820210
SIELOFF, BEVERLY
AMWAY WATER FILTER
115.61
115.61
49737
05/16/00
831570
SPIEGEL ASSOCIATES
DELECTO SCALE
432.39
DELECTO SCALE
26.39-
406.00
49738
05/16/00
842200
STAPLES, PAULINE
GARDEN SUPPLIES
87.75
87.75
49739
05/16/00
850340
SUMMIT INSPECTIONS
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
2,049.20
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
2
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
2
2
49740
05/16/00
860080
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
AC FINE ASPHALT
60.39
60.39
49741
05/16/00
860650
TARGET STORES -CSA A/R
POP /MDSE. FOR RESALE
140.32
140.32
49742
05/16/00
861669
THE MOBILE PHONE COMPANY
NEW CELL PHONE & HOOK UP
75.00
NEW CELL PHONE & HOOK UP
116.99
191.99
49743
05/16/00
880501
TREADWAY GRAPHICS
DISK /HACKY SACS /GLITZ PENCILS
252.00
252.00
49744
05/16/00
900100
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
1,071.51
ABA EXTREME LEVEL IIIA
600.00
BADGE -K9 JAGR
69.01
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
76.00
14
VOUCHRE2
05/12/00. 10:37
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 6
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
CHECK
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
BOOTS & BELT
66.55
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
55.80
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
382.05
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
76.45
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
76.45
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
101.25
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
37.30
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
33.75
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
29.65
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
115.65
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
90.00
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
61.00
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
75.50
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
179.95
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
24.87
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
28.22
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
44.00
3,294.96
49745
05/16/00
900225
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
DRY CUT ASPHALT
326.58
DRY CUT ASPHALT
326.58
653.16
49746.
05/16/00
911350
VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
RECEPT PLATE COVERS
43.96
CIRCUIT BREAKER
68.91
112.87
49747
05/16/00
912103
VISIONARY SYSTEMS, LTD.
FIREHOUSE SOFTWARE/LIC SUPPORT
660.00
660.00
49748
05/16/00
- 931300
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
520.00
COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
650.00
COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
650.00 -
COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
30.00
550.00
49749
05/16/00
931860
WASTE MANAGEMENT
KOHLMAN PARK - APRIL 2000
363.17
363.17
49750
05/16/00
941690
WILSON RAQUET SPORTS USA NET /FAOM BALLS
177.43
TENNIS PRACTICE BALLS
217.26
394.69
49751
05/16/00
970700
YOCUM OIL CO.
FUEL DC 4
24.34
24.34
TOTAL CHECKS
114,769.59
15
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
ount
Transmitted Settlement
Date
Date
Pa ee
Descri ti
p on
Amount
05/08/00
05/09/00
MN State Tr
Treasurer
i
Drivers License #697
575.50
05/08/00
05/09/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar
p y # 149
25,945-56
05/05/00
05/09/00
CBSA
Dental fees
1,236.71
05/09/00
05/10/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
840.00
05/09/00
05/10/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar p y g #149
22,233.65
05/05/00
05/10/00
Elan Financial Services Purchasing ard items terns
1
05/10/00
05/11/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
608.00
05/10/00
05/11/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
P Y g
25
05/11/00
05/12/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
834.00
05/11 /00
05/1-2/00.
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar p y g #149
25, 283.22
05/12/00
05/15/00
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
655.50
05/12/00
05/15/00
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar p y g #149
16, 684.98
TOTAL
122__1_609.23
16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
0-5/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/12/00
DIRECT DEPOSIT 05/12/00
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------ - - - - --
ALLENSPACH,SHERRY
ALDRIDGE,MARK
BOHL,JOHN C
FLOR,TIMOTHY
FRASER,JOHN
TAUBMAN,DOUGLAS J
PALMA I STEVEN
JOHNSON,KEVIN
ERICKSON,VIRGINIA A
HELLE,KERRY
ANDREWS,SCOTT A
HASSENSTAB,DENISE R
HIEBERT I STEVEN
DUNN,ALICE
CORNER,AMY L
MOREHEAD,JESSICA R
BELDE,STANLEY
RENSLOW
BAKKE,LONN A
BOWMAN,RICK A
KOPPEN,MARVIN
PIKE,GARY K
HEINZ,STEPHEN J
HERBERT,MICHAEL J
STOCKTON,DERRELL T
AMOUNT
-------- - - - - --
339.27
2007.99
2382.23
2029.63
2153.92
2121.80
2089.63
2268.48
2116.04
2048.'29
2328.19
83.20
2488.32
2184.88
194.00
33.60
2185.89
57.40
1894.43
2026.43
339.27
1849.70
2116.60
2026.43
2026.43
i IN
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
----------------------
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
- - - - --
ROSSMAN, DAVID A
-------- - - - - --
2060.28
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
HALWEG ,KEVIN R
2443.70
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
JUNG,STEPHANIE J
1564.97
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
MARUSKA I ERI CA
196 e85
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
OLSON,JULIE S
1337.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
:
.DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
BREHEIM,ROGER W
1573.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
LARSON, DANI EL J
1501,72
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
THIENES , PAUL
2160,25
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
CALLAHAN , COLLEEN J
1870.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
CARLSON, THERESE
17 54'o 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
LE , SHERYL
3266.92
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
FAUST,DANIEL.F
3528.12
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
BADMAN G
, AYLE L
2265.18
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
KELS EY,CONNIE L
688.52
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
GUILFOILE,K;AREN E
2129.79
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
POWELL,PHILIP
1698.26
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
WINGER, DONALD S
3 3 2 2.3 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
BANICK, JOHN J
2 614 .55
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
KARL S, FLINT D
2288,03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
KVAM, DAVID
2363.66
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
RAB BETT,KEVIN
2493.87
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
STEFFEN,SCOTT L
2593.30
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
THOMALLA,DAVID J
2614.
2614955
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
BERGERON, JOSEPH A
2732910
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
GERVAI S —JR , CLARENCE N
1980,89
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIR.ECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
LUKIN, STEVEN J
-------- - - - - --
2579,94
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
HAIDER, KENNETH G
4 3 2 8.12
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
1875.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
K;ANE , MICHAEL R
2135,23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
LUNDSTEN,LANCE
2374.77
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M
2465.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
ANDERSON,BRUCE
3234.51
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
MARUSKA,MARK A
2135.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
HUTCHINSON,ANN E
1780.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
COLEMAN, MELINDA
3123 .13
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
GRAF ,MICHAEL
1211.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/1?/00
ROBBINS , AUDRA L
1272.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
ATKINS , KATHERINE
1149963
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
CROS SON LINDA
�
1628.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
EASTN[AN ,THOMAS E
213 0.8 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
STAPLES,PAULINE
2400.31
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
SCHLINGMAN,PAUL
1826.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
HURLEY,STEPHEN
2247.05
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
S Z C Z EPANSKI , THOMAS J
2263953
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
WENZEL,JAY B
1337.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DOBLAR, RICHARD N
1323.95
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
COLLINS KENN
, ETH V
339.27
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
CAMPBELL, CRAIG D
1244.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J
243.93
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
ERI CKSON , KYLE F
5 01.6 8
19
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
.
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
_AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
WEAVER, KRISTINE A
904.71
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
HAWKINS LISA A
100.75
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
KOEHNEN,AMY
54.75
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
McGUIRE,MICHAEL A
4180o37
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
TRONNES,JOHN E
1244.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
OSTER J
1508.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
URBANSKI , HOLLY S
1385943
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
ANDERSON , CAROLE J
863.54
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
JACKSON , MARY L
14 8 5.6 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
TETZLAFF, JUDY A
13 4 0.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
CASAREZ,GINA
1368.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
ICK ES,SHERI
1304.33
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
CARL E,JEANETTE E
1433.37
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
JAGOE, CAROL
1414930
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
OLSON,SANDRA
882
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
CORCORAN I THERESA M
1343.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
MA.RTINSON, CAROL F
1751.18
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/3-2/00
EVERSON I PAUL
18 7 6.2 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
PARSONS , KURT G
1310924
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
SPANGLER EDN A E
554.85
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
ZWI EG
.� SUS AN Co
1480.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DeBILZAN,THOMAS C
1199923
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
EDGE, DOUGLAS
1538.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
LUT Z ,DAVID P
15 6 4.6 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
MEYER, GERALD W
16 2 3.2 3
r
. 20
21
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
NAGEL, BRYAN
1584.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
OSWALD, ERICK D
1565.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
THOMAS— JR,STEVEN
1532.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
DUCHARME
,JOHN
1776.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
PECK,DENNIS L
DIRECT DEPOSIT
1877.63
.
05/12/00
PRIEBE,WILLIAM
2075919
,.DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
.05/12/00
DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M
15 0 8.0 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES
1561.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
GREW— HAY �,JANET M
8 4 6.0 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
HORSNELL, JUDITH A
1114.60
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
NELSON , JEAN
897.64
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
GAYNOR , VIRGINIA A
1715.35
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
FRY, PATRICIA
1446.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
LIVINGSTON J OYCE L
837.15
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
THOMPSON,DEBRA J
480.65
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
EKSTF►AND ,THOMAS G
1890.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
ROBERTS,KENNETH
1 9 3 2. 6 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
CARVER, NICHOLAS N
1856,03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
KELLY ,LISA
1149942
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
NORDQUI ST , RI CHARD
1544o83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
OTI S MARY ELLEN M
633.39
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
CH RISTENSEN,JODIE D
505.52
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
COLEN[AN, PHILIP
294.30
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT' DEPOSIT
05/12/00
FARR,DIANE M
261,62
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
HORWATH , RONALD J
336.53
21
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAM. E
------------------------------
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
JOHNSON, MEGAN M
r
•
. ` 231.36
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
LARSON,DEBRA
273.91
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
MOORE,VANESSA J
751.89
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
SAVAGEAU,STEPHEN D
1374903
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
SEEGER,GERALD F
3 68.31
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
STEINHORST,JEFFREY
489.86
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
SWANSON , LYLE
1510965
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
COSTELLO , SHARON L
172.87
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/12/00
BRANDSTROM, RYAN M.
203.00
78388
05/12/00
CARDINAL,ROBERT J.
385,50
78389
05/12/00
WASILUK,JULIE A
339.27
78390
05/12/00
ZICK,LINDA
460900
78391
05/12./00
CUDE,LARRY J
391.71
78392
05/12/00
EDSON,KAREN L
846.00
78393
05/12/00
SHELLEDY,DAWN M
•
755.71
78394
05/12/00
MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE
1630.70
78395
05/12/00
JOHNSON,BONNIE
833977
78396
05/12/00
VIETOR,LORRAINE S
1472,64
78397
05/12/00
PALANK,MARY KAY
1751.18
78398
05/12/00
RICHIE,CAROLE L
1547.78
78399
05/12/00
RYAN,MICHAEL
2935.09
78400
05/12/00
SVENDSEN,JOANNE M
1971.04
78401
05/12/00
BARTZ,PAUL
2568.02
78402
05/12/00
BUSACK,DANIEL P
1337.63
78403
05/12/00
KONG,TOMMY T
938.99
22
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
78404
05/12/00
SHORTREED,MICHAEL P
2137.93
78405
05/12/00
THELL,BRANDON M
189000
78406
05/12/00
WATCZAK,LAURA
1936983
78407
05/12/00
WELCHLIN,CABOT V
1996.83
78408
05/12/00
HALE,THOMAS M
1484.34
78409
05/12/00
MEEHAN,JAMES
2200935
78410
05/12/00
MORNING,TIMOTHY L
1168.92
78411
05/12/00
SVENDSEN,RUSTIN L
2060.00
78412
05/12/00
CHLEBECK,JUDY M
1564.03
78413
05/12/00
NIVEN,AMY S
443.2 0
78414
05/12/00
FREBERG,RONALD L
1590.43
78415
05/12/00
JONES,DONALD R
1344.03
78416
05/12/00
ELIAS, JAMES G
1981.04
.78417
05/12/00
KUNO,MICHAEL R
168:00
78418
05/12/00
LINDBLOM,RANDAL
2248,22
78419
05/12/00
EDSON,DAVID B
1590.43
78420
05/12/00
HELEY,ROLAND B
1590.43
78421
05/12/00
HINNENKAMP,GARY
1552.55
78422
05/12/00
LAVAQUE,MICHAEL
1532. 03
78423
05/12/00
LINDORFF,DENNIS P
1561.63
78424
05/12/00
RODRIGUEZ,RAUL J
486.00
78425
05/12/00
KUDA,KRISTEN L
357o75
78426
05/12/00
SOUTTER,CHRISTINE
153.56
78427
05/12/00
WEGWERTH,JUDITH A
1508.03
78428
05/12/00
SCHMIDT,JASON E
1470.83
23
AMOUNT
- rrrrr- r�rrrrr
534 .51
2213.63
1844.03
77.50
30.38
1335.23
141.75
88.13
112.00
156.00
488.00
42.60
108.50
115.60
1601.71
993.97
1354.43
79.27
120.70
835.95
941.21
852.17
30.18
163.20
95.85
24
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD.
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
CHECK DATE
---- - -
EMPLOYEE NAME
78429
- - --
05/12/00
------------------------------
ANDERSON,EVERETT
78430
05/12/00
OSTROM,MARJORIE
78431
05/12/00
WENGER,ROBERT J
78432
05/12/00
BRANDSTROM,JULIET M
78433
05/12/00
BRANDSTROM,MARY C
78434
05/12/00
FINN,GREGORY S
78435
05/12/00
FLUG,'ELAINE R
78436
05/12/00
FLUG,MEGAN L
78437
05/12/00
FRANK,LAURA
78438
05/12/00
GEBHARD,JILLIAN R
78439
05/12/00
LANDE,DAVID L
78440
05/12/00
McBRIDE,PATRICK D
78441
05112/00
SHOBERG,KARI A
78442
05/12/00
TVEDTEN,ERIK A
78443
05/12/00
GERMAIN,DAVID
78444
05/12/00
NADEAU,EDWARD A
78445
05/12/00
SCHULTZ,SCOTT M
78446
05/12/00
COONS,MELISSA
78447
05/12/00
DISKERUD,HEATHER A
78448
05/12/00
GLASS,JEAN
78449
05/12/00
HOIUM,SHEILA
78450
05/12/00
KARAS,TAMARA A
78451
05/12/00
OGREN,ALLISON A
78452
05/12/00
POWERS,NICOLE L
78453
05/12/00
RIDLEHOOVER,KATE I
AMOUNT
- rrrrr- r�rrrrr
534 .51
2213.63
1844.03
77.50
30.38
1335.23
141.75
88.13
112.00
156.00
488.00
42.60
108.50
115.60
1601.71
993.97
1354.43
79.27
120.70
835.95
941.21
852.17
30.18
163.20
95.85
24
25
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
.AMOUNT
78454
05/12/00
SALZBRENNER,HEIDI T
182.83
78455
05/12/00
SCHMIDT,RUSSELL
1251.23
78456
05/12/00
SHOBERG,CARY J
585.60
78457
05/12/00
ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L.
209.00
78458
05/12/00
ANDERSON,JULIE M .
2 62.16
78459
05/12/00
ANDERSON,TIMOTHY R
162.11
78460
05/12/00
BACHMAN,NICOLE T
65 .00
78461
05/12/00
BITTNER,KATIE C
144.24
78462
05/12/00
CHAPMAN,JENNY A
472.00
78463
05/12/00
DEMPSEY,BETH M
12 0.10
78464
05/12/00
DeGRAW,KRYSTAL M
333. 11
78465
05/12/00
ERICKSON,CAROL A
40.40
78466
05/12/00
FERRISE,CHRISTINA M
123.50
78467
05/12/00
FRUCI,REBECCA L
136.50
78468
05/12/00
GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C
297,75
78469
05/12/00
HAFNER,ALEXIS J
68,78
78470
05/12/00
HAWKE,RYAN A
249.83
78471
05/12/00
HEINN,REBECCA L
63.90
78472
05/12/00
HILLS,CHRISTINE M
94925
78473
05/12/00
HOLMGREN I LEAH M
169.63
78474
05/12/00
HORNING,CHRISTOPHER M
117.25
78475
05/12/00
HOULE,DENISE L
154.80
78476
05/12/00
,.
HUPPERT, ERIN M
336913
78477
05/12/00
IKHAML,JOHN
225.53
78478
05/12/00
JOHNSON,ROBERT P
162.43
25
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
78479
05/12/00
JOHNSON,STETSON
81975
78480
05/12/00
JOHNSON,SUSAN M
90000
78481
05/12/00
JOPKE,KIMBERLEE J
27,83
78482
05/12/00
JOVONOVICH,TODD R
52.70
78483
05/12/00
KAHLER,BRADLEY G
52900
78484
05/12/00
KERSCHNER,BRANDON R
134.88
78485
05/12/00
KERSCHNER,JOLENE M
131.18
78486
05/12/00
KOEHNEN,MARY B
544954
78487
05/12/00
KROLL,MARK J
20940
78488
05/12/00
MEISEL I TAMBREY
246.08
78489
05/12/00
MEVERDEN,LAURA J
114.63
78490
05/12/00
MOSSONG,ANDREA M
104.00
78491
05/12/00
MOTZ,ERIN M
178.91
78492
05/12/00
O
40.50
78493
05/12/00
OLSON,ABIGAIL E
123.50
78494
05/12/00
OSTEBO,BARBARA C
20.13
78495
05/12/00
OWEN,JONATHAN
45.93
78496
05/12/00
PEHOSKI,JOEL T
62.23
7.8497
05/12/00
SMITLEY,SHARON L
203.00
78498
05/12/00
STEINKE,JACOB P
134.28
78499
05/12/00
SWANER,JESSICA
88.15
78500
05/12/00
THELL,HEIDI
36.00
78501
05/12/00
TIBODEAU,HEATHER J
80.55
78502
05/12/00
WEDES,CARYL H.
117.00
78503
05/12/00
WELTER,ELIZABETH M
157.20
26
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
------- - - - - --
CHECK DATE
---- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------ -
AMOUNT
-
78504
05/12/00
- - - --
WHITE,TIMOTHY M
-------- - - - --
52.40
78505
05/12/00
WHITING,ROBIN A
78.00
78506
05/12/00
WILLIAMS,KELLY.M
686.83
78507
05/12/00
WOODMAN,ALICE E
381.50
78508
05/12/00
WORWA,LINDSAY M
78.60
78509
05/12/00
ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L
87934
'78510
05/1 .2/00
BERGUM,TANIA S
32.81
78511
05/12/00
BOSLEY,CAROL
125.05
78512
05/12/00
BRAUNIG,MELISSA J
37.50
78513
05/12/00
FLEMING,KATHY A
731925
78514
05/12/00
FLEMING,LAURA C
311.25
78515
05/12/00
GLASS,GILLIAN
32.25
78516
05/12/00
GROPPOLI,LINDA M
211.75
78517
05/12/00
HANSEN,ANNA K
184.38
78518
05/12/00
HANSEN,EMILY J
24.00
78519
05/12/00
HUPPERT,ERICA L
102.00
78520
05/12/00
JOHNSON,NANCY A
93.00
78521
05/12/00
SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN
365.20
78522
05/12/00
ANTON,SARAH E
147.60
78523
05/12/00
BEHAN,JAMES
1304.03
78524
05/12/00
BLANCHARD,KEVIN J
94.50
78525
05/12/00
BOTTOLFSON,COLLIN R.
66.00
78526
05/12/00
CHAPEAU,GREG M
476957
78527
05/12/00
DOUGLASS,TOM
168900
78528
05/12/00
GRENDZINSKI,DIANE J
107.10
27
304306.03
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
'
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
78529
05/12/00
HEMPFER,NICHOLAS W
144.90
78530
05/12/00
JAHN,DAVID J
1365910
78531
05/12/00
KOSKI, JOHN F
836.03
78532
05/12/00
KYRK,ASHLEY
60900
78533
05/12/00
LONETTI,JAMES F
336.82
78534
05/12/0Q
'MATTESON,FRANK M.
193.65
.78535
05/12/00
MORIN,TROY J
180.00
78536
05/12/00
PRINS,KELLY M
242960
78537
05/12/00
REILLY,MICHAEL R
527954
78538
05/12/00
SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M
138.81
1 78539
05/12/00
YOUNG,DILLON J
184.80
78540
05/12/00
AICHELE,CRAIG J
1187971
78541
05/12/00
MULVANEY,DENNIS M
1727.23
78542
05/12/00
PRIEM, STEVEN A.
1547907
304306.03
AGENDA ITEM G Z
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Engineer
SUBJECT: McKnight Road EVP, Project 98 -09
DATE: May 15, 2000
Action by Coundl
Bate
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
This project concerns the installation of emergency vehicle pre - emption (EVP) systems
at McKnight Road and Conway Avenue, and McKnight Road and Innovation Boulevard.
These two signals are the only two controlled intersections in Maplewood that did not
have EVP.
The city council has already approved the necessary agreements for these installations.
We have recently received quotations from electrical contractors and now know the cost
of the project. At this time the council needs to establish a budget for this project to
continue. The costs involved are eligible for state aid funding.
It is recommended the city council establish budget of $18,000 for Project 98-
09, McKnight Road EVP.
KGH
jc
AGENDA NO, G3-
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: May 16, 2000
RE: Used Car Lot
Introduction
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modred
Rejected
Brad Beatty and William Schwartz have submitted an application for ownership of a used car lot
currently known as "Used Car Center" located at 1908 Rice Street.
Their hours of operation will be Monday through Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and on
Saturday's from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
The application has been approved by Community Development as required by city code.
Recommendation
Approve the submitted application.
AGENDA NO. G y
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Ken Haider Action by Council
Acting City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk Date
Endorsed
Modified.
DATE: May 16, 2000 . -
Rejected
RE: Lawful Gambling License - Temporary
p Y
Introduction
VFW Post 8901, 1946 English Street, has submitted application for a tt mporary gambling
license to conduct pull tabs at the Ramse
Y County Fair July 12 th - 16th. This is an annual event
for Post 8901.
The purpose of the organization is to promote outh activities
Y and assist in community building.
Recommendation
It is recommended that council approve the application for •
pp temporary gambling license for
VFW Post 8901.
Agenda No. r7 4
Recommendation
It is recommended that Council adopt the following Resolution, approving a temporary gambling license for
VFW Post 8901:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY LAWFUL GAMBLING
VFW Post 8901 at Ramsey County Fair, Ramsey County Fairgrounds
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit
for temporary lawful gambling is approved for VFW Post 8901, to operate at the Ramsey County Fairgrounds,
2020 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of
application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of
the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota
Statute §349.213 and the City allows the Board to issue a permit before 30 days.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood,
Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
AGENDA NO. G S
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk . R/
DATE: May 16, 2000
RE: Lawful Gambling License - Temporary
Introduction
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
St. Paul"East Parks Lions Club, 1821 North Myrtle Street, has submitted application for a
temporary gambling license to conduct bingo at the Ramsey County Fair July 13 th -16th. This is
an annual event for St. Paul East Parks Lions.
The purpose of the organization is to promote community service.
Recommendation
It is recommended that council approve the application for a temporary gambling license for St.
Paul East Parks Lions.
Agenda No. G S
Recommendation
It is recommended that Council adopt the following Resolution, approving a temporary gambling license for
St. Paul East Park Lions Club:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY LAWFUL GAMBLING
St. Paul East Park Lions Club at Ramsey County Fair, Ramsey County Fairgrounds
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit
for temporary lawful gambling is approved for St. Paul East Park Lions Club, to operate at the Ramsey County
Fairgrounds, 2020 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of
application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of
the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota
Statute §349.213 and the City allows the Board to issue a permit before 30 days.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood,
Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
AGENDA mEm NO.��,�,
MEMORANDUM Action b C
Y =wn
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
TO: Acting City Manager, Ken Haider
FROM: Community Development Director
SUBJECT: CDBG AGREEMENT YK�
DATE: May 12, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Ramsey County is requesting that the City approve an agreement for community development
block grant (CDBG) funds. This agreement would allow the County to receive a guaranteed
amount of money from the federal government. The County uses some of the money for county-
wide programs and distributes the rest to the County's suburbs. The purpose of the money is to
develop community development projects that benefit low and moderate income people.
BACKGROUND
The City has approved similar agreements with Ramsey County since 1985. The city has received
many grants and loans for such projects as The Village on Woodlyn, Carefree Cottages, Golden
Star Apartments and many home rehab and improvement projects. Over the past ten years 13 5
homes in Maplewood have received an average rehab grant or loan of $9,000.
DIS CUSSION
Approving this agreement would be in the City's interest. If the City does not sign this
agreement, the City would have to compete for these funds in a State -wide pool. Our chances of
receiving money are better through the County. To date, the County has approved all of the
City's requests.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached resolution with Ramsey County for CDBG money.
me /memocdbg.00
RAMSEY COUNTY
Office of the County Manager
Paul L. Kirkwold, County Manager
250 Court House
15 West Kellogg Boulevard
St. Paul, MN 55102 -1614
April 28, 2000
Ken Haider
City of Maplewood
1830 E. Cty Road B.
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Haider:
Tel: 651 - 266 -8000
Fax: 651 - 266 -8039
e -mail: www.co.ramsey.mn.us
Fifteen years ago, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, hereinafter referred to
as HUD, determined that Ramsey County would be eligible to become an Entitlement Urban
County and receive an annual allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) dollars
in excess of one million dollars. This money would be used to undertake housing and community
development activities primarily benefiting the residents of suburban Ramsey County. In 1992, the
Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME) program was also added as a resource for the County.
Seventeen suburban communities have chosen to participate in the agreement process over the past
fifteen years, thus, ensuring that a guaranteed annual allocation would be earmarked for the County
and those suburban municipalities that desire to actively participate in the program.
Recently, HUD has notified us that we remain eligible to continue our participation in this federal
program. Our eligibility and the actual dollar amount we receive is based upon the population
accumulated through the number of j urisdictions that join with us.
Our records show that since 1985 your community has signed cooperation agreements with the
County to ensure our eligibility.
This year it will be necessary to execute a second amendment to our Joint Cooperation Agreement,
due to HUD requirements. A copy of the amendment is attached to this letter. Please have it
approved by your City Council or Town Board and return a fully executed copy to us no later than
June 2, 2000. The County Attorney's Office has advised us that the first two paragraphs of this
amendment are clarifications of existing language in our existing Cooperation Agreements but have
been included to satisfy the local HUD office. The third paragraph may be a new requirement for
your municipality. It requires that you have adopted certain policies that are clearly set out in the
amendment. You may have already adopted one or both of these policies as a condition of some
other program or agreement, but if you have not they must be in place by the time the amendment is
executed.
Minnesota's First Home Rule County
printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10% post - consumer content
I1isCME
As has been the case in the past, federal regulations require that we advise you. of your opportunity
to "opt out" of the County's Entitlement and compete directly with other cities in the State's Small
Cities program. We, of course, hope that you will not choose this route, as we feel that the County
program is your best opportunity of receiving an allocation for an eligible project.
If, however, you do choose to "opt out ", please be advised that you may not have an opportunity to
participate with us for the next three years. "Opt out" notification must be made to both the County
and the local HUD office no later than June 2, 2000.
INCLUSION IN THE COUNTY ENTITLEMENT DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT YOU
ACTIVELY PARTICPATE IN THE PROGRAM, IT DOES PROVIDE THE COUNTY
WITH THE NEEDED POPULATION TO QUALIFY AND INFLUENCES OUR ANNUAL
ALLOCATION.
We are pleased with the active participation of a number of our municipalities over the past several
years. Our suburban communities, as a group, have set county -wide priorities the past six years for
use of CDBG and HOME funds. These priorities have resulted in the creation/retention of over 200
jobs, and over 900 low - income, suburban homeowners receiving rehabilitation funding.
The HOME funds, which are utilized exclusively. for affordable housing, have resulted in the
addition of several large -scale rehabilitation projects, many new rental units, and expanded
homeownership opportunities in suburban Ramsey County for families and senior citizens.
We would like to see more communities that believe they have an eligible project contact us about
the possibility of funding.
Should you have any questions, or need assistance, please contact Judy Karon, Director of
Community and Economic Development, at 651 -266 -8006. She will be happy to assist you.
Sincerely,
Paul Kirkwold
County Manager
cc: Commissioner Reinhardt
SECOND AMENDMENT
TO R.AMSEY COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMEMNT
The Joint Cooperation Agreement between the County of Ramsey and
( "MUNICIPALITY ") commencing August 31, 19.91,
and the First Amendment to that Agreement, effective July 1, 1997, (collectively
"AGREEMENT ") is further amended as follows:
1. The effective date of this Second Amendment is July 1, 2000.
2. 'The AGREEMENT is amended by the addition of the following language:
A. By executing this AGREEMENT the MUNICIPALITY understands that it:
1 . May not apply for grants from appropriations under the Small Cities
or State Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Programs
for fiscal years during the period in which it participates in the
AUTHORITY'S CDBG program; and
2. May participate in a Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME)
Program only through the AUTHORITY. Thus, even if the
AUTHORITY does not receive a HOME formula allocation, the
MUNICIPALITY cannot form a HOME consortium with other local
governments.
B. Both the AUTHORITY and MUNICIPALITY are obliged to take all
actions necessary to assure compliance with the AUTHORITY's
certification required by section 104(b) of Title I of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Housing Act, section 109 of Title I of
the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and other
applicable laws. The AUTHORITY is prohibited from funding for
activities, in or in support of, any cooperating unit of general local
government that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own
jurisdiction or that impedes its actions to comply with its fair housing
certification. This provision is required because noncompliance by the
MUNICIPALITY may constitute noncompliance by the AUTHORITY
which can, in turn, provide cause for funding sanctions -or other remedial
actions by the Department
C. The MUNICIPALITY has adopted and is enforcing:
1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement
agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in
non - violent civil rights demonstrations; and
2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against
physically barring entrance to or exit from . a facility or location
which is the subject of such non - violent civil rights demonstrations
within jurisdictions.
3. Except as expressly modified herein, the AGREEMENT remains in
full force and effect.
RAMSEY COUNTY HOUSING AND MUNICIPALITY
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By By:
Paul Kirkwold
Ramsey County Manager Its
Dated: Dated:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL APPROVED AS TO FORM .
Judy A. Karon, Director Harry D. McPeak
Community and Economic Development Assistant Ramsey County Attorney
This Document Drafted By:
Office of the Ramsey County Attorney
St. Paul, Minnesota
AGENDArMM N0G ,t�.�_
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council
To: Acting City Manager Ken Haider
From: Chief of Police Donald Winger
Subject: Acceptance of Grant Funds
Date: May 12, 2000
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Introduction
Council..approval is required to authorize the acceptance of grant funds for the
Maplewood Police Department.
Background
The Police Department was recently awarded. a $3,000 grant from Minnesota Join
Together (MTU), a non- profit youth education and safety project administered by the
American Medical Association, to fund youth education and underage drinking
prevention.
This funding will be used to reimburse officer overtime and related costs as Ma lewood
p
officers work with schools, community groups, and on- and off -sale liquor
establishments to reduce underage drinking.
Before grant funds can be received, a Council resolution is required which authorizes
the Police Department to accept and expend these funds as outlined in the approved
grant proposal (a copy of which is attached).
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve said resolution and p rovide a notarized
copy of same to Minnesota Join Together.
Action Required
Submit to the City Council for review and action.
DSW: js
Attachment
April 20, 2000
h
Maplewood Police Department
Attn: Officer Sally Dunn
1830 County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
A Coalition to Reduce
Dear Officer Dunn:
Underage Drinking
p inform you that our Mini Grants Committee and
We are leased t0 ' ' Govern i ng
Board have approved your grant request for $3000 to address policies reducing
2829 ver ndale Avenue
youth access to alcohol in'your community.
Anoka, MN 55303 -1593
.612 -427-5310 1
-
To receive your check, please complete and return the following two enclosed forms:
MN 800 -247 -1303
1. Minnesota Join Together Mini Grant Check Request Form
FAX 612- 427 -7841
2.. Signed Expectations of - Minnesota Join Together Grantees Form
Keep the Progress Report and the Final Report forms on file and lease remember
p p
to send in those reports when they are due. The progress- report is due on or before
'
August 15, 2000 and the final report is due on or before November 30; 2000.
•
We have also enclosed an alcohol compliance check database form we would like -
you to use to record results from- compliance checks conducted with the use of
these funds. ThisIorm was produced with the input of police officers community
p p �
groups and public health specialists. Please send this form in with your Progress
.
and Final reports. Feel free to use the form in any compliance checks you do with
-
or without MJT funds. When you send us any of .these forms, the data will be
entered into a specially designed database we are setting, up to report compliance
p
checks statewide. We would be happy to provide any reports or raw data back to
you after it is entered and run.
We hope to be able to provide you and your.'organization with assistance and look
forward very much to working with you on improving the health and safety of our .
young people and communities. Tanya Prahl; our communications coordinator, will
•
be contacting you soon to assist with any media needs ou may have. =
Y Y
If.you have any questions please contact Jeff Nachbar at (612) 760 -7165 or b y
..
e -mail at <jnachbar@miph.org >. Administrative questions can be directed to Rachel
_
- Komyate at (651) 662 -7312 or <rkomyate @ n iph.org >.
GOVERNING BOARD
S
Connie Bernardy, Chair
Linda Bosma,^ Vice Chair
Therese Blaine
' =
Lance Boelter
Jeff Nachbar
Bryan Brown
Project Director '
Priscilla Lord Faris
Robert Grytdaht
• John Gulla
Cassie Hamilton
r
Connie Bernard
Judy K napp
Governing Board Vice'Chair
Jaime Martinez
Gary Nytes
Linda Ojala
• Anu Sharma
Janet Silversmith
Mark Vukelich
A printed on recycled paper containing at
�i� least 30% post - consumer paper fibers
Minnesota Join Together Coalition
2000 Mini -Grant Application
Year 4
You may use this form, or duplicate it.
Your proposal must be limited to a total of five pages.
Proposals are due. by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, March 17, 2000 at the Minnesota Join
Together Office, 2829 Verndale Ave., Anoka, MN 55303.
There are no exceptions to these criteria.
Applicant/Organization Name: Maplewood Police Department
Contact Person: Address: Officer Sally Dunn
City: Maplewood
State: M N
Zip:
55109
Daytime Phone: _.L651_) 770 -4540
Evening Phone:
L612)
Email address:
Amount Requested: _ $3.000 __ (Between $500 and $5,000)
What geographic area will your project impact? City of Maplewood
Have you applied for a MJT Mini -grant before? No Was it funded?
1. Describe your project in detail: Our oro i seeks to reduce social and commercial
provision of alcohol to underaoe individuals though a combination of education and
enforcement efforts. Our educational effort will use printed and video materials to
inform and motivate licensed liquor retailers and social groups concerning the legal and -
human conseauences of providing liauor to underage drinkers. our enforcement efforts
will include increased surveillance of on= and off -sale premises, an undercover buy
program. and a targeted neighborhood_ patrol program. In addition, by adding
underage drinking prevention themes to the ongoing dialog between our neighborhood
_po_lici officers school liaison officers, and juvenile investigators. we will encourage
peer group_ acceptance of abstinence from underage drinking.
2. How does your project promote policy change and support MJT's policy priorities?
_ Our project includes locally- conducted compliance checks of licensed premises,
targets potential adult providers of alcohol to underage drinkers, and
encourages the development of young non - drinkers as peer -group advocates.
3. How will your proj ect ' reduce youth access to alcohol in your community?
The premise checks will reduce the availability of alcoholic beverages from
licensed sellers and the neighborhood patrols will target underage drinking at
"social" functions and youth gathering areas (parks'& public facilities. In
addition, by educating license holders and adult community groups with
.., regard to the consequences and penalties for furnishing alcohol to underage
drinkers. we hope to heighten . public awareness and encourage timely incident
epo and adult self- restraint.
4. What other organizations, agencies, and individuals will participate in your project? (Note:
Attach a list of any key collaborators, with address, contact names, and phone
numbers.)
East Communities Family Service (Chemical Awareness) 651- 770 -0311
Mothers Against Drunken Driving 651-774 -6404
Re 'ons Medical Center - David Cheesebrow, RN, MPA, CCRN 651- 699 -2718
GTN Community Cable Access 651- 779 -0230
5. If your project includes youth, how will they be involved in your project?
_ We will use volunteers to conduct controlled purchases during our
_ enforcement efforts. We will also encourage youth volunteers to work with
peer g[oups in discussions and activities hosted bv our De artment to increase
y outh awareness of the conse uences of underage drink in Lastly, undera e
youths will be the focus of some of our contact and education efforts.
7
6. Describe your plan to use the media to promote your project or results.
Our media plan includes circulation of the "Alcohol Kills" video which we will
produce. In addition, we will provide PSNs for local cable access and community
,._..,and school ,papers. We will invite TV news to ddealong on our enforcement
efforts including targeted Datrolling and remise ins ection controlled buys.
We will also prepare and submit news releases and articles for local papers.
We wi11 encourage the media to attend some of our community group meeting
7. What other projects have your group /organization carried out in the last three years that
indicates we can expect you to be successful with this one?
Safe & Sober `97.and `99 Grants; MN !Community Oriented Policing Grant:
1998 & 99 Tobacco Compliance Program. - 1999 Auto Theft Prevention Grant
8.. Provide a timeline for your project, listing the major steps you will take to complete it, who
is ��
responsible for carrying it out, and when. (Projects must be completed within six months of
p
receipt of funds.)
Step Person/Group Responsible For Date /Completion 3
Network with involved groups Off Dunn Now - Pro iect end
_Prepare videotape Off Heinz 15 May 00
Prepare/order materials
Off Dunn & S9t Steffen
30 ADM 00
_
Conduct offsale compliance
Sgt Rabbett
1 May...-
30 Sep
00
Conduct youth awareness
, Off Dunn & Szczepanski
1 May,
- 30 Sep
00
Conduct taraeted enforcement
Lt Thomalla & Banick
1 May
- 30 Sep
00
Conduct community awareness
Neighborhood Officers
1 May
- 30 SeD
00
9. Provide a budget for your project. Be specific about how you will spend the
money you are requesting. Do not list 'miscellaneous" or 'supplies" or other
general categories as items.
Item Cost
_ Enforcement officer overtime L4 hrs/wk for 12 weeks} 1
_ Program intern pay L40 hrsl __„ 400 _
_
Produce & distribute videotapes $550
Purchase & print awareness materials 370
Total Budget $ _ 3
10.. Is additional funding required to complete your project? Yes No
Do you have commitments, for these funds � Yes No
List an y additional funds, and their source. List only funds you have secured.
Source Item To Pay For Amount
Maplewood PD Program Administration $880
_ Cit of Maplewood Postage & Supplies 120
4
11. How will you follow up your project? What do you anticipate will occur after
your project is complete?
We will conduct quart erly compliance inspections for one year after the program
_ We will add underage- drinkine youth _awareness to our youth issues agenda
We will include. underage ,drinking awareness to our sneaker's bureau tonics list
We anticipate that the completed project will result in increased community
awareness of the problem and compliance with existing statutes which will
_gradually fade unless periodically reinforced by additional education a
_ enforcement efforts.
12. In what ways can you/your organization participate in the Minnesota Join Together
Coalition?
We will work to inform elected officials of the need to revise the Dram Shop law to
include ,penalties for non - commercial providers of alcoholic beverages to underage
adults, We would gladly host coalition meetings at, our. community center.
13. By submitting this application, the organizations and individuals involved in this project
agree to comply with all reporting requirements as requested by MJT, to provide
documentation of project activities, data on any compliance checks conducted, and copies of
any media coverage.
Agreed - _ Date. _ March 17.2000
gigned by conmet perso
R
AGENDA NO. GS
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Ken Haider, Acting City Manager
Colleen Callahan, COS Coordinator
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
May 3, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Attached is the 1999 Human Relations Commission Annual Report for your information
and review. Gordon Heininger, Chair, will be present at the May 22 City Council
meeting to answer any questions.
RECOMMENDATION
HRC recommends approval of the 1999 Human Relations Commission Annual Report.
Attachment
AGENDA NO. G 9
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Acting City Manager
Finance Director d
DISPOSAL OF OLD FINANCIAL RECORDS
May 9, 2000
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
.Rejected
Annually the City disposes of financial records that have passed their legally
required retention period. However, before the records can be destroyed, the City
is required by law to submit the attached resolution and application for approval to
the State. It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted so that the
appropriate financial records can be destroyed.
hu
C:\OFFICE\WP-DOCS\FINANCE\RECDISP.AGN
Attachments
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, M.S.A. 138.17 governs the destruction of city records; and
WHEREAS, a list of records has been presented to the Council with a request in
Writing that destruction be approved by the Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA;
1. That the Finance Director is hereby directed to apply to the Minnesota
State Historical Society for an order authorizing destruction of the
records as described in the attached list.
2. That upon approval by the State of the attached application, the Finance
Director is hereby authorized and directed to destroy the records listed.
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
STATE ARCHIVES DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY
TO DISPOSE OF RECORDS
2. Division or Section
Instructions:
1. This form does not provide continuous authority to dispose of similar records and cannot be used to approve a records retention
schedule.
2. Complete original and three copies. Photocopies are acceptable.
3. Complete items 1 through 6 and item 8. Use reverse side to continue records description. If more space is needed, use plain paper.
4. Send original and two copies to the State Archives Department, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 -1906,
5. Retain one copy until your approved copy is returned. The approved copy will be your authority to dispose of records. It should be
retained permanently.
6. Additional copies of this form are available from the address above or by telephoning 612 -297 -450240 (FAX: 612 -296 -9961)
NOTE: Laws of 1971, Chapter 529, Section 3 reads as follows. "It is``the policy of the legislature that the disposal and preservation of public
records be controlled exclusively by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 138 and by this act, thus, no prior, special or general statute shall be
construed to authorize or prevent the disposal of public records at a time or in a manner different than prescribed by such chapter or by this
act and no general or special statute enacted subsequent to this act shall be construed to authorize or prevent the disposal of public records at a
time or in a manner different than prescribed in chapter 138 or in this act unless it expressly exempts such records from the provisions of such
chapter and this act by specific reference to this section."
1. Agency or Office
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
4. Location of Records
For use by Records Panel
Application No. Date
3. Quantity of Records
Finance Department A 9166 - Cubic Feet
5. Laws other than M.S. 138.17 that relate to the destruction or safekeeping of the
records:
Maplewood Public Works Building None to our knowledge
6. I certify that the records listed on this application are accurately described, and that
they have no further administrative, legal, or fiscal value for this agency.
Authorized Signature (Type name below)
Daniel F. Faust May 9, 2000
Name Date
Finance Director 651/770-4513
Tide Phone
AUTHORIZATION: Under the authority of M.S. 138.17, it is hereby ordered that the
records listed on this application be destroyed, except as shown in item 7.
Director, Minnesota Historical Society Date
Legislative or State Auditor
Date
Attorney General
Date
7. Exceptions to Destruction. (For use by Records Disposition Panel).
8. Description of Records. Describe each record series or type of record separately. Number each series, beginning with "I":
a. Item No. b. Name of record, form numbers, content, usage, arrangement, original, c. Inclusive Dates
duplicate, or microfilmed.
1
FINANCIAL RECORDS (6 -year retention)
Cash Treasurer Report
Original
A/P Check Register
Original
Bank Statements /Bank Reconciliation
Original
Deposit Slips
Original
Cancelled A/P Checks
Original
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
(OVER)
2
3
4
FINANCIAL RECORDS (10 -year retention)
Invoice Registers /Journals Original
Paid Invoices &Claim Vouchers Original
PAYROLL RECORDS (6 -year retention)
P/R Leave Hours Report
Original
a. Item No.
b. Name of record, form numbers, content, usage, arrangement, original,
C. Inclusive Dates
Original
duplicate, or microfilmed.
Original
Quarterly P/R Reports
(1 cont.)
FINANCIAL RECORDS (6- year), Continued
Original
P/R Deductions - UW, W -2, W -4 Forms
Receipts
Original
1993
Health Insurance Books
Journal Entry Books
Original
1993
1099 Information
Budget Changes Documentation
Original
1993
Charitable Gambling
Original
1993
A/R Cash Receipts Journal
Original
1993
Ambulance Billing Records
Original
1993
A/R MIS /DEV Billing Records
Original
1993
2
3
4
FINANCIAL RECORDS (10 -year retention)
Invoice Registers /Journals Original
Paid Invoices &Claim Vouchers Original
PAYROLL RECORDS (6 -year retention)
P/R Leave Hours Report
Original
Time Sheets
Original
P/R Check Register
Original
Cancelled P/R Checks
Original
Quarterly P/R Reports
Original
Garnishments
Original
P/R Deductions - UW, W -2, W -4 Forms
Original
Pay Rate Documentation
Original
Health Insurance Books
Original
Accident Reports
Original
1099 Information
Original
UTILITY BILLING RECORDS (2- to 6 -year retention)
Adjustment Reports (6 -yr.)
Original
3illings (Register) (5 -yr)
Original
)aily.Transaction Reports (5 -yr)
Original
delinquent Reports (2 -yr)
Original
ieceipts: Utility Bill Stubs &Cash
Register Tape (6 -yr)
Original
1989
1989
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993 & Older
1992 & older
1992 & older
1997 & older
1993 & older
PR-1 (1/94)
C:10FFICEIWP DOCSIFORMS%DISPOSE.REC
AGENDA NO. G io
TO: Acting City Manager
AGENDA REPORT
FROM: Finance Director-
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
RE: TRANSFER TO CLOSE TILSEN NORTH STREET PROJECT
DATE: May 11, 2000
On April 10 the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed special
assessments for the Tilsen North Neighborhood Streets Project 99 -05. At the
conclusion of the hearing, the Council decided not to adopt the assessments and
the project was canceled.
The costs incurred on the project were $21,244.54. It is recommended that the
Council approve a transfer from the General Fund to finance these costs. The
2000 budget amount for transfers of this type is $30,000.
RTI NAN CE\WP\AG N\CLOS9905.WPD
AGENDA NO. GII
TO: Acting City Manager
AGENDA REPORT
FROM: finance Director —
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Dejected
RE: TRANSFERS TO CLOSE NINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUNDS
DATE: May 11, 2000
PROPOSAL
It is proposed that transfers and budget changes be approved to close nine
public improvement project funds that have been completed.
BACKGROUND
The final state aid payments have been received on nine public improvement
projects. Some of the projects have cash balances and some have deficits
because state aid and investment interest has been more or less than
anticipated. The attached schedule lists the projects, cash balances /deficits and
proposed transfer amounts.
Project 87 -05 has a large cash balance due to investment interest and extra
state aid. It is proposed that the cash from investment interest be transferred to
other projects that have a cash deficit. The extra state aid in six projects is
proposed to be transferred to the Street Construction State Aid (SCSA) Fund
which is in accordance with city policy. Money in the SCSA Fund is used to
subsidize the cost of public improvement projects.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council approve the following interFund transfers and
the appropriate budget adjustments:
From
To
Fund #
Fund #
Amoun
523
560
$46,285.31
523
590
22,834.03
523
598
20,035.07
523
568
172,321.78
523
404
259,734.56
550
404
10,051.61
553
404
51,903.74
588
404
15,992.21
593
404
46
599
404
42,726.45
The attached schedule lists the fund numbers, projects titles and transfer
amounts.
P: \FINANCE \WP\AGN \PIP0510.WPD
TRANSFERS TO CLOSE PIP FUNDS -MAY, 2000
FUND PROJECT TITLE
523
87 -05
MCKNIGHT RD. PHASE III
550
89 -04
COUNTY ROAD C, TH61 TO HAZELWOOD
553
89 -12
WHITE BEAR AVE, LARPENTEUR TO FROST
560
90 -04
T.H. RICE STREET (49) IMPROVEMENTS
588
95 -18
BELLAIRE AVENUE, BEAM TO LYDIA
590
96 -11
COPE AVENUE OVERLAY
593
96 -19
ENGLISH STREET - LARPENTEUR TO FROST
598
97 -07
LONDIN LANE /MAILAND ROAD BIT. OVERLAY
599
97 -08
SKILLMAN AVE - DESOTO TO EDGERTON
(22, 834.03)
22,834.03-
TOTALS
568
89 -21
MALL AREA TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
404
20,035.07
STREET CONSTRUCTION STATE AID
05 -31 -00
CASH
BALANCE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
(0.00)
(417,741.78)
403, 948.82
FILE NAME: PIP0510
LOCATION: P: \123R5W\MISC
DATE: 11- May -2000
PREPARED BY: DF
INV.INT.
TRANSFER
05 -10 -00
TRANSFERS
TO
CASH
TO PROJECT
SCSA
BALANCE
FUNDS
FUND
521,210.75
(261,476.19)
(259,734.56)
10,051.61
(10,051.61)
51,903.74
(51,903.74)
(46,285.31)
46,285.31
15, 992.21
(15, 992.21)
(22, 834.03)
22,834.03-
46, 543.64
(46, 543.64 )
(20,035.07)
20,035.07
42, 726.45
(42, 726.45)
599, 273.99
(172, 321.78)
(426,952.2 1)
(590, 063.56)
172, 321.78
(23,003.39)
426,952.21
05 -31 -00
CASH
BALANCE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
(0.00)
(417,741.78)
403, 948.82
FILE NAME: PIP0510
LOCATION: P: \123R5W\MISC
DATE: 11- May -2000
PREPARED BY: DF
AGENDA ITEM N60, 11 , illmmm R w
Acdcm by Comte
MEMORANDUM Date-
Endar
red
TO: City Manager
Modified
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner Rejected
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Plan Revisions — Carver
Elementary School
LOCATION: 2680 Upper Afton Road
DATE: May 10, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Proposal
Mark Hayes, of Armstrong, Torseth, Skold & Rydeen, Inc., is requesting approval of a site plan
change for Carver Elementary School, 2680 Upper Afton Road. Refer to the maps on pages
7 -9. Mr. Hayes is proposing to relocate the hard - surfaced outdoor basketball court area and the
pea - graveled play area that are behind the building to the front, just west of the existing parking
lot. (Refer to their statement of intended use on page 11.)
Request
Mr. Hayes is requesting that the city council amend the conditional use permit (CUP) and site
plan for Carver Elementary School to allow the proposed changes.
BACKGROUND
December 19, 1994: The city council approved a cooperative agreement with the school district
to share in the costs of building a gymnasium addition at Carver Elementary School.
March 27, 1995: The city council approved:
1. A conditional use permit to expand the school.
2. The design plans for the addition.
3. A waiver of the rooftop- equipment screening requirement.
4. An underground lawn sprinkler variance.
October 12, 1998: The city council approved a revision for the Carver Elementary School
conditional use permit. This change was for the addition of a parking lot on the east side of the
school building. (See the 1998 parking plan on page 10.)
March 9, 1999: The community design review board approved plans for the school to build two
small building additions and one concrete dock platform at the school.
DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit
An advantage of the proposal is that it moves the play areas to a more visible area near Upper
Afton Road. This should be safer for the users of the play areas, especially when school is n i
session.
However, parking at the school can be a problem when there is a large event such as a
tournament in the gym, school conferences or the annual school carnival. During the CUP
review for the proposed building addition in 1995, the city council also approved a parking lot
expansion on the west side of the existing parking lot. Refer to the map on page nine. However,
the applicant felt in 1998 that this location for additional parking was no longer feasible. They
wanted to keep this area for recreational purposes. The proposed relocated play areas would be
in the area of this future parking lot. If the city approves the requested site plan change, then
there would not be room to expand the parking lot to the west. The city should require the
applicant to provide proof of parking for at least 20 additional parking spaces on the site with the
move of the playground.
The applicant felt in 1998 that the easterly side of the school was more suitable for the additional
parking because it is unused and would provide convenient staff parking. In 1998, the city
council._ approved a CUP revision and the site plan change for the school district to add the
parking lot on the east side of the school. Refer to page 10. The school has finished the parking
lot on the east side of the school. This parking area added 38 spaces to the site. There are
presently 94 parking spaces on the site at Carver Elementary. The city code does not specify
minimum parking requirements for elementary schools, but the number of spaces should be
adequate for most days for this facility.
COMMISSION ACTION
May1, 2000: The planning commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit
amendment for this request.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution on pages 15 -16. This resolution amends the conditional use permit for
playground and play area changes at Carver Elementary School, 2680 Upper Afton Road.
Approval of this permit amendment is based on the findings required by the code and subject to
the following conditions (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out):
1. All construction shall follow the plans for building the 1995 building expansion stamped
January 18, 1995 and the utility, grading and erosion control plans stamped March 9, 1995.
The parking lot expansion shall follow the plans stamped August 14, 1998. The proposed
storage room addition, folding -door enclosure addition and loading dock platform expansion
shall follow the plans stamped February 19, 1999. The proposed play area relocation shall
follow the plans date - stamped April 14, 2000, subject to the applicant providing city staff with
a proof of parking plan for the site that shows at least 20 additional parking spaces The
director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The play area relocation must be started within one year after
council approval or the permit amendment shall end. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
2
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
I surveyed the owners of the 43 properties within 350 feet of this site. Of the 13 replies, seven
were for the proposal, five objected and one had no comment.
For
1. This is an important move for the safety of Carver School students and the children in the
community. (Carver School, 2680 Upper Afton Road)
2. This is a good idea. This was the original site of the playground equipment. The present site
is isolated, not visible from the road. Parents are reluctant to let their children play back there.
(Brenner, 2673 Upper Afton Road)
3. We think this is a good idea. Neighborhood children play there when school is not in session,
but are hidden by the building and are at risk of being injured. No one knowing or worse being
abducted and no one seeing anything.. (Meyer, 2689 Upper Afton Road)
4. We are in favor of this proposal and think it's a good idea as long as our taxes are not
increased as a result and thanks for asking! (Loss, 15 Mayhill Road)
5. OK to move playground where it was originally. Now young adults smoke, drink beer, urinate
on the slides after hours. There should be a sign on Farrell Street - Slow Children. There are 5
toddlers near Upper Afton and Farrell. No golfing on area near Upper Afton and Farrell except
with plastic balls. People have broken windows on two houses at the corner. Tax payers can
use the area. (Eastman - 21 Farrell Street)
6. Looks fine to us. (Lutheran Church of Peace, 47 Century Avenue South)
7. OK by me. Thanks. (Medical Clinic - 2716 Upper Afton Road)
Against
1. Your proposal is utterly ridiculous and wasteful. Bringing the playground out front will create a
gawker slow down from all the pedophiles out shopping. What about creativity? With all that
grass and ball fields, why don't you plant more trees or a garden. With all that concrete, the
school will have to spend $1,000,000 for knee pads and helmets and the kids will be too close
to traffic. Have the kids plant the garden. (Brady, 2647 Upper Afton Road)
2. 1 am voting this down. I don't think it's fair for the people to have to keep paying for something
they really don't need. I am on a fixed income and cannot afford for my taxes to go any higher
than they are. First they needed a new gym and we paid for it. They needed a new parking lot
and we are still paying for it. I think that there should be a limit and I think that we are at the
limit. If they need anything more then have them raise the money. I do not see them paying for
my taxes going. up. I think enough is enough and I am not the only one that has had enough.
(Schroepfer - 22 Mayhill Road)
3. We strongly disagree with a move of the child playground. Why would anyone want to risk the
safety of children? We feel by moving the playground to Upper Afton Road you all are asking
for injury of innocent children. The playground might as well be in the middle of the street and
hope no child is hurt by a car that does not abide by the speed limits. (Perkins, 27 Farrell St.)
4. It does not make sense to me that the kids would be safer by the road and it looks like they
would have to walk through the parking lot to get there, but it really does not matter to us.
(Owner, 21 Century Avenue)
Also see the letter starting on page 11.
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 9.4 acres
Existing'' use: 4 Carver Elementary School
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: A single dwelling across Upper Afton Road
South: School property and Ramsey County Open Space
West: Carver Elementary School playground
East: Afton Road Dental Clinic and Super America
PAST ACTIONS
December 19, 1994: The city council approved a cooperative agreement with the school district to
share in the costs of building a gymnasium addition at Carver Elementary School.
March 27, 1995: The city council approved:
1. A conditional use permit to expand the school.
2. The design plans for the addition.
3. A waiver of the rooftop- equipment screening requirement.
4. An underground lawn sprinkler variance.
March 25, 1996: The city council reviewed the CUP and decided not to review it again unless a
problem develops.
May 11, 1998: The city council approved a sign size variance allowing the Maplewood Parks
Department to install a "community gymnasium" wall sign on the gym.
October 12, 1998: The city council approved a revision the CUP to allow a new parking lot.
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: S (school)
Zoning: F (farm residence district)
4
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Section 36- 437(3) requires a CUP for schools.
Section 36- 448(b) requires a CUP amendment for any enlargement, structural alteration or
intensification of use when a CUP has been issued.
CRITERIA FOR CUP APPROVAL
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on ten standards. Refer
to the findings in the resolution on pages 14 -15.
Application Date
The city received all the application materials for this request on April 14, 2000. State law requires
the city to take action on this request by June 13, 2000, unless the applicant agrees to a time
extension.
ext 9
p:secl- 28 /carver.00
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. 1995 Site Plan
5. 1998 Parking Lot Plan
6. Applicant's Statement of Intended Use
7. 4 -24 -00 letter from Joseph Grill
8. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
9. 11- by 17 -inch plans date - stamped April 14, 2000 (separate attachments)
10. Full -size plans date - stamped April 14, 2000 (separate attachments)
S
Attachment 1
a � HvosoN Pt.
Cn
CREEK :.
MAYER W.
JAMES «w
CR EEK vi
gkTo QARK Atton
Heights
UPPER AfTON RD.
DR.
Z
: 5
mj
J
N
W
�
�
W
J
P
O
V
Z
Z
�
BA PARK
REG I.R
���
0
z
W
N
ro
LOCATION MAP
6
i
N
K
C
BA PARK
REG I.R
���
I LoNaN cr.
z aor,o CT.
3 DOF2UN0 W.
4 OORUWO DR.
LOWER
S OORIAND R0.
"
a ooRLM,D PL
a �a►°o CT.
q
�A
.
P"SEY COUNTY
IONDIN W. D
CORRECT10NAt.
FAClLffY
nq
o HI p°��
'yo
R �q4
2
3
W
1� • p'pAY
�
4
PONS p 5
\
� gy p z
�
z
�
� � J � ` N
�
.� �' P � k � AVE
0 8 8
K1NG AvE
8 �
� O'DAY
�
y
Q
MAIIAN
Cl . ,
p
0
LOCATION MAP
6
i
N
Attachment Z
Lm ::..0
t3
L=am? r
21-3J.
18 � 11 � ^ 20 � ^ � I A 4. 3
3 4
6 0 ' 1 6r° �y� o i LOU°�, o ( 0
d0lb To. 6 1 , 135 13 .►(�lj�l
UPPER.AFTON R�OAD�N � ff�W*
I
SCHOC
%3
1
,
i
Z3 75 ac .
(6)
N 110
� ZS
to
RAM S E *i' coU N TY.
1 OPEN SPACE
' •- - - - !!
!' I
IS All
j
e` s .
N 1
• FUEL
� 715 STATIO
so am 4mmum z
a a'•
mob w
ION CLINIC .s t*f
SA;
�
' ,COMMERCIAL
L CENTER
C. _'
Loth F.urchdr
(4-) f ie.
LUTHERAN CHURCH
OF PEACE
W
�� sss �
(� (I 5.49ac ) �_ Z
/Pot,
,
Ln
I1,
J
22
■ CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
• Q
Wl
?04
Nv o ►4 „ls q t O . ► c,► E �.a.
e. n+ �4oto s•ie• ss
' ,COMMERCIAL
L CENTER
C. _'
Loth F.urchdr
(4-) f ie.
LUTHERAN CHURCH
OF PEACE
W
�� sss �
(� (I 5.49ac ) �_ Z
/Pot,
,
Ln
I1,
J
22
■ CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
li
N
• Q
?04
Nv o ►4 „ls q t O . ► c,► E �.a.
e. n+ �4oto s•ie• ss
�
noc ,a41�p� �/�• /.� :�
• W
V
a�
(7)
T 5
:�o1'x10' Rd E.•�� ���
C�
•
- am
-
-
- --
• .'''A
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
li
N
Attachment 3
r sox
i o f
V
1dy
:
PROPOSE
D RELOCATE D
PLAY AREA
SITE PLAN
PROPOSED PLAY AREA
RELOCATION PLAN I I ,�
pilso,
WSW
V
.......... W.—I 'a-owl:
10000I .. .....
VILL $I"
*Nwobsu"
plow
gap
CARVER SCHOOL
4,0
ftv
WKS
S" plea
soft
a".
•w•
MUM
rot
oe
r
or 4w OEM
FALAGJM WWV%* ftAT&TAM M SWAK
pookove 10 84 smo Wwmo LAIK .... 6;7..
AD= w In a -- E . c am
PLAY AREA PROPOSED
K % TO BE MOVED
ol F ..e do .1
e -
J t doe .0
dW
SITE PLAN
PROPOSED PLAY AREA
RELOCATION PLAN I I ,�
pilso,
Attachment 4
FUTURE PARKING LOT
APPROVED IN 1995
(NOT. BUILT)
r% 1 • I
CARVER SCHOOL
O O .0 • 1 re-1
O'er APPROVED PLAY AREA
SITE PLAN
CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
1995 SITE PLAN APPROVAL
4
N
0
Attachment 5
PARKING LOT ADDED IN 1998
1998 PARKING PLAN
10
4
N
Attachment 6
ARMSTRONG, TORSETH, SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC.
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS Project Number 99074.6
MEMORANDUM NO 3
DATE March 28, 2000
PROJECT Carver Elementary School
2680 Upper Afton Road
Maplewood, Minnesota
SUBJECT Statement of Intended Use
FOR Revision of Conditional Use Permit, City of Maplewood, MN
BY Mark Hayes, Owners Representative
On behalf of our client we respectfully request that a revision to the existing Conditional Use Permit applying to the above
site be granted. As our plans show we are moving the existing playground from the south of the building, to the north of
the existing ball fields and west of the existing parking lot. The existing playground equipment will be reinstalled in a new
play area. Additional pavement will be provided for hardscape games such as hopscotch, 4 square, and basketball.
This rearrangement of use areas is necessary to improve the safety of the playground. Moving this activity to the front of
the building will not only improve supervisor oversight during school hours, but will expose the play area more easily to law
enforcement scrutiny from the street and parking lot during non - school hours. Additionally, emergency vehicle access will
be greatly improved, saving valuable time during an emergency.
As our plan shows, the existing vegetation between the playground and the street will be adequate to partially screen the
area, yet leave views into and out of the site for safety. We have also provided partial fencing panels to control site
pedestrian traffic, catch loose balls, etc. and generally delineate the playground area to the users. These panels will still be
open enough to allow easy emergency access. We feel that school and neighborhood supervision of the play area will be
greatly improved with the new location, and that the playground will become a more effective and inviting school and
community asset.
Thank you for considering our revision, and please feel free to contact our office with any questions or concerns you may
have.
11
_ E ��Slo2
Attachment 7
o
lFF � J i'�i k -0 W I.., C vio-'- rl. I�tDrt�trvls C /V r) / -r r)t 141
f 1 # "I 1 _ _ /7 / l �'~ n /_i . /, E h "r Sc?' r.
ELL D 6 a 4 v
(7, P-C-7
T -Q� (�7-11
114.0 A) 0, 'IV r,,( Woo(-C2 f3t
, ft' l : '�Li 1r- �i �"� (✓ � r� t �"� (., to C 4) io n i 7 A d f » 1 I eN. t 'ri rl <, Ci 0
� ffJQ ` ice • � �^ , •Q ` 1 r � 1 AV
T" Cu)n L2 CO Po-ol"Ooto"H e-I 0 C, 01 t-,7&b2 a. 1:
(1( �'.''t -� �� ` Po r kt' i k p C M - ork r, 14 r� r_ i c t c. f /v (E* ti A R f S" / Alt'? jq
�' �-- aw-
..
j �, PFF - 1-- -)C r-E Iq u wh"s
1� 150 (C (N 1/1 V 0 ozs
�- 1 M 1 A:rj!: jq cr-. E�L - , .� S:2VCiLSI-9-t�r Q(2CW6 SC.�daj dc2c-)Cdn 1,HtQN
: EL Oi 2 �VC2
no ]L-b
V. 61-) Lp 11 c MO C� t ( Z�:-, e :DE izloo 1 -,
(Z- 4z- PFC( Ce
12
ijpo K- f Ni r I (--IT n�1 C .. (� i r � i i N' r i A ( Pow i �� i\( /,-) L (� i.-r Our C. iii - f= ij_
a, -� C
4S T n T]i C*'- 5 C i of
�� S
(
411° _ A �I , a-',
1
I I- / v %%I c
-) ('-R, C. k- IVA N /
MA 1 6 to F) Rc�� rn) a hic to c
0 fu t 12C.- r iv 96 7
(22trir--a2, r-)' i h c, OS C2e I n:LOC .5 Lu i
Ullr', l(L1VJL-- SCdOC2� 9COWS Ek-f^l cipalao t=00
i9C2(21 SCt(C20L bDQ�?&
cz 7 f) P , W ., 'v o LL I
� ` 1 E ; 5 I B I � er � � G l
rr loop ♦�`
T TO
171 LY
Udi&2 WILL C , ( ., *"-; C " C L L (3
�l
t�
1V 2 r l c.7 t{ f
j W v r
ow-
I V LAIL Lc) P'L I E(- I e
0- lZo C) �j 1-,) A) I i iF ) r �
c�7 �� Y_ (� K; rte, �H F,(-,2 R P: ;; 01 (-, r i iv( C( le , �(.) C) i.' To L. i R i( �
, pi a
I -H a
b "t"000000o
61 E a 16 ! r - 1� --
56
.� "Et �Fl
IDC,PQPY(2QMD (-c2C(9:tWLJ 0 6 1 ("Z S 1�6 13 1 1 V 9 :7U IZ 8 L L�� t 1: Z-? I c a -ho-&-l-
v(A/rj/ LL-
C EQZ
�L A/ I C- i o., )61(- 2s
F P( C�,
13
a on Lo 126:�L-i 4 1 ri(IS 7 -So, a
'Oft fir/
ammommo-Im" _=wAmmmww_-O�% '00)
14
Attachment 8
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Independent School District No. 622 is requesting that Maplewood approve an
amendment to their conditional use permit to allow the following change:
To relocate the hard - surfaced outdoor basketball court area and the pea - graveled play area
that are behind the building to the front, just west of the existing parking lot.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2680 Upper Afton Road. The legal description is:
Beginning at a point twenty (20) rods west of the Northeast corner of the North Half of the
Southeast Quarter (N'/ of the SE 1/4) of Section One (1), Township twenty eight (28), Range
Twenty two (22); thence South forty (40) rods; thence - West forty (40) rods; thence North forty
(40) rods; thence East forty (40) rods to the point of beginning.
(PIN 1- 28 -22 -41 -0005)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit amendment is as follows:
1. On May 1, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
permit.
2. On May 22, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the
hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit amendment based on the building and site plans. The city approves this
permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity
with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The�use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation
that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any
person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air
pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or
other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
15
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental. effects.
10. The city council may waive any of the above requirements provided the council determines that
the balancing of public interest between governmental units would be best served by such a
waiver.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans for building the 1995 building expansion stamped
January 18, 1995 and the utility, grading and erosion control plans stamped March 9, 1995.
. The parking lot expansion shall follow the plans stamped August 14, 1998. The proposed
storage room addition, folding -door enclosure addition and loading dock platform expansion
shall follow the plans stamped February 19, 1999. The proposed play area relocation shall
follow the plans date- stamped April 14, 2000, subject to the applicant providing city staff with a
proof of parking plan for the site that shows at least 20 additional parking spaces. The director
of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The play area relocation must be started within one year after council approval or the permit
amendment shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 2000.
16
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAP LEWOO D, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, MAY 1 2000
B. Carver Elementary School Conditional Use Permit Revision (2680 Upper Afton Road)
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Ledvina asked if the
parks and recreation director for Maplewood had reviewed this proposal. Mr. Roberts confirmed
that he had and was supportive of the new location. He said the director wanted to make sure
that the fields were available for T- ball. According to Mr. Roberts, the police also commented on
the proposal. Lt. John Bannick, the supervisor for this south district, said it would improve the
safety of the users, increase visibility and improve emergency vehicle access. He was
concerned about the loss of future parking area and potential noise from the outdoor basketball
court.
Commissioner Thompson felt that any additional parking would be a barrier between the school
and the playground and would compromise the safety of the children during the school year.
Commissioner Trippler asked if anyone had considered rotating the proposed relocated play
area 90 degrees counterclockwise.
Mark Hayes, of ATS &R Architects, was present. He thought the idea to relocate the play area
came from the school principal. Relocation would allow better visibility from the school of what
is happening in the play area. Mr. Hayes said that the future parking, referred to in the
comments, has already occurred and is the parking provided on the east. He thought 20
parking spaces could be put on the south side of where the play area is currently being
proposed. Then the parking would be between the play area and the school. Mr. Hayes
suggested looking at additional parking at the time more classrooms or gym space were added.
He said the existing soft play area with the pea gravel would be relocated but the existing hard -
paved play area at the south side of the building would be kept. Mr. Hayes felt that moving the
play equipment to the northwest corner eliminates the need for anyone to be back in the old play
area. He thought the basketball backstops would remain in this area. Commissioner Pearson
thought this was reason for the problems.
Commissioner Mueller was concerned about the durability of the four -foot plastic, vinyl- coated,
chainlink fence. He also questioned if there was a way to make the path from the playground to
the school obvious. Mr. Roberts thought there might be several monitors on the school site to
ensure that the path is used. Commissioner Rossbach commented that chainlink fence is
"probably the most durable fence" that could be installed here.
Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution
which amends the conditional use permit for playground and play area changes at Carver
Elementary School, 2680 Upper Afton Road. Approval of this permit amendment is based on
the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions (additions are
underlined and deletions are crossed out):
1. All construction shall follow the plans for building the 1995 building expansion stamped
January 18, 1995 and the utility, grading and erosion control plans stamped March 9, 1995.
The parking lot expansion shall follow the plans stamped August 14, 1998. The proposed
storage room addition, folding -door enclosure addition and loading dock platform expansion
shall follow the plans stamped February 19, 1999. The proposed play area relocation shall
follow the clans date - stamped April 14., 2000. subject to the applicant providing city staff with
a proof of narking plan for the site that shows at least 20 additional parking spaces. The
director of community development may approve minor changes.
Planning Commission Minutes of 05 -01 -00
2. The ulav area relocation must be started within one year after
council approval or the permit amendment shall end. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Commissioner Trippler seconded. Ayes Fischer, Frost, Ledvina, Mueller,
Pearson, Rossbach, Trippler
Nays Thompson
The motion passed.
AGENDA ITEM _.H I
uncit
AGENDA REPORT Action by Co
Date
TO: City Manager Endorsed Modified
Rejected
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Street Improvements, City Project 99 -13
Assessment Hearing, 7:10 p.m., Monday, May 22, 2000
DATE: May 12, 2000
Booklets for the proposed assessments have been provided separately as a
supplement to the agenda. The proposed assessments are the same as were outlined
in the feasibility study and as were presented at the s. neighborhood meeting
g
The proposed assessments have been mailed out to the affected property owners,
providing them with the specific assessment information for their properties.
The total amount proposed to be assessed is $239,225.00. This amount includes
street and /or storm sewer assessments for those living in the project area.
Staff held a series of three meetings with the residents living adjacent to the subject
streets ( Bartelmy Lane, Mary Street, Sterling Street and Magnolia Avenue). In addition,
project design information and a design questionnaire were sent to each resident to
gather information during the design process. Questionnaire responses were used to
tailor fit the design as best as possible, to meet the preferences of each resident. After
two follow -up reminders, questionnaires had been returned by 42 of the 48 households.
Average attendance at the neighborhood meetings was 35 %. Fifty -six percent of the
�households had-attended at least one of the three meetings.
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached Resolution for the
Adoption of the Assessment Roll for Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets,
Project 99 -13.
CIVIC
RESOLUTION
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city
council has met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment
for the construction of Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets as described in the files of
the city clerk as Project 99 -13, and has amended such proposed assessment as it
deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special
assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is
hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first
Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.0% percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment
shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until
December 31, 2000. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest
for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in
the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds
by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the
assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not
made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for
the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such
assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which
may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or
improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby
declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section
420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the
assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements.
5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment
to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal
taxes.
City of Maplewood
Official Sign -Up Sheet
By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the
Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes.
Name (first &last) - please print
Address
1. - 0 -1 /</ A /.. 6 /� T E—
I U ft-I 0- F %
z.
4. ) 6) j�l
5.
6. Pll w � Con>
7. Le
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Fk Y
I L-) %I
eel; 9
6�� Ct �� �t
J: �.
AGENDA ITEM N0.1.3- ow
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Design Review
PROJECT: Sprint PCS Monopole
LOCATION: 2500 Hudson Place
DATE: May 15, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Action by Council
Date
Endors
Modified
Rejected
Wendy Metchnek, representing Sprint PCS, is proposing to install a 75- foot -tall monopole for
telecommunications equipment. They want to install this monopole west of the existing parking
lot of Christ United Methodist Church at 2500 Hudson Place. (Refer to the maps and plans on
pages 8 -11 and the statements starting on page 12.) There also would be equipment boxes on
a pad near the base of the monopole and they would enclose the base area with asix- foot -tall
chain -link fence.
Requests
The applicant is requesting that the city approve:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a monopole and related equipment in an R -1 (single -
dwelling residential) zoning district.
2. The design and site plans.
BACKGROUND
On December 13, 1993, the city council approved a CUP for the church to expand and for an
existing pre - school day care center. This approval was subject to two conditions.
On January 13, 1997, the city council adopted the commercial use antenna and tower ordinance.
DISCUSSION
The 1996 Federal Telecommunications Act does not allow cities to prohibit the installation of
telecommunications facilities and equipment. Because of this law, local governments may only
regulate, but may not prevent, the installation of monopoles or other telecommunications
facilities. As such, the city may only base their decision about this request (or any other similar
request) on land use and on health, safety and welfare concerns.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses all telecommunications systems. This
licensing requires that the proposed or new telecommunications equipment not interfere with
existing communications or electronics equipment. If there is interference, then the FCC requires
the telecommunications company to adjust or shut down the new equipment to correct the
situation. Maplewood must be careful to not limit or prohibit this tower (or any other tower)
because of electronic interference. That is up to the FCC to regulate and monitor.
As part of their site selection process, Sprint considered using several other structures in the
area for an antenna site but found that these did not meet their needs. These included the
Holiday Inn at 1 -94 and McKnight Road, the water tank on McKnight Road north of 1 -94 and the
existing monopole on the north side of 1 -94 in Landfall. Sprint also contacted 3M about using one
of their buildings for an antenna site but 3M denied their request.
At the May 1, 2000, planning commission meeting, the neighbors south of the church asked
Sprint and the church to move the proposed monopole farther north on the site toward 1 -94. City
staff, representatives of Sprint and the church met on the site on Tuesday, May 2, 2000 to review
this request. Working together we picked another possible site for the monopole that is near the
northwest corner of the church parking lot. (See the site plans on pages 9 and 10.)
The city council should approve this request. This project meets the requirements of the
Maplewood tower ordinance and the criteria for a CUP.. As proposed, the tower would be about
200 feet from the south property line of the site (the city code requires at least a 100 -foot
setback) and much of the base area would be screened by existing trees. The applicant is
proposing to add trees in three areas on the property to help screen the base area from view
from nearby homes. These planting areas include an area west of the garage, on the north side
of the proposed lease area and northeast of the existing church building. (See the site plans on
pages 9 and 10.) The site design, with the additional tree planting, would be compatible with the
adjacent church and parking lot.
In addition, the city has approved similar monopole facilities at two other churches in Maplewood
that are near residential neighborhoods. These include Presentation Church on Kennard Street
and Trinity Baptist Church at 2220 Edgerton Street, just south of Highway 36. 1 am not aware of
any complaints about these monopoles since their owners installed them.
COMMISSION ACTION
On May 1, 2000, the planning commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit
for this proposal.
On May 9, 2000, the community design review board recommended approval of the proposal.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 20 and 21. This resolution approves a conditional use permit
to allow up to a 100- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment. This
approval is for the property at 2500 Hudson Place. The city bases this approval on the
findings required by the ordinance and is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plans dated May 15, 2000, as approved by the city.
The applicant shall locate the monopole and the necessary lease area near the northwest
corner of the church parking lot as noted on the site plan on page nine of this report. The
director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
2
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant or owner shall allow the co- location of other providers' telecommunications
equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions.
5. Any antenna that is not used for a year shall be deemed abandoned and may be required
to be removed.
6. The applicant or Sprint shall post a bond or other guarantee with the city to ensure proper
removal of the antenna and monopole and the restoration of the site.
B. Approve the site and design plans date - stamped May 15, 2000, for up to a 100 - foot -tall
telecommunications monopole and equipment to the property at 2500 Hudson Place.
Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the applicant doing the
following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued permits for this project.
2. Before the city issues a building permit, city staff must approve a landscaping plan for the
property. This plan shall show the planting of a mix of Austrian Pine and Norway Pine
trees to the west of the existing garage, on the north side of the proposed lease area and
northeast of the existing church building. (These are the areas noted for additional tree
planting on the plans date - stamped May 15, 2000.) These trees are to help screen the
base area. These trees shall be at least 8 feet tall, balled and burlapped and shall be
planted in staggered rows as shown on the proposed plans.
3. The access drive between the tower lease area and the existing parking lot shall be
paved with bituminous.
4. If the landscaping or trees are not installed by the completion of the tower, the city shall
require the applicant to provide a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the
required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any
unfinished landscaping shall be completed within six weeks of occupancy.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
City staff surveyed the owners of the 43 properties within 350 feet of the proposed site. We
received 15 replies. 13 were against the proposal and two had no objections. (These responses
were to the applicants original proposal. Since then, the applicant has revised the plans by
moving the monopole about 200 feet north and adding landscaping in three areas on the church
property to help screen the base area of the facility.)
Against
1. I do not want this built in what is my backyard - I pay too much in taxes and we are constantly
getting stuff shoved down our throats. Put it somewhere else. (Rowe - 179 Sterling Street)
2. Why not place this monopole west of Carver School. This would be away from houses and
far enough from the school. No one wants these towers close to their homes. (Gilbertson -
222 Sterling Street)
3. We would not be in favor of the installation of this facility - it will alter the appearance of what
is otherwise an attractive suburban setting. (Recchio - 2439 Brookview Drive)
4. We do not wish to have this monopole placed near our home. We think the Sprint Company
could find a commercial area for this telecommunication monopole. Placing this pole as far
away from homes as possible. I would like to receive information on the studies done,
confirming the safety of this monopole. To guarantee the health and welfare of our family,
down to our grandchildren. The children have a play area not far from the proposed
monopole structure. (Elizondo - 2447 Brookview Drive)
5. We oppose the building of this telecommunications monopole because:
1. It will reduce our home value
2. It is too close to our home
3. It will interfere with our phone, TV, radio
4. The impact to the environment
5. The impact to our health
Anything happens due to building of this telecommunications monopole, especially our home
value and our health should be the responsibility of the city. Please consider this decision
very carefully. (Nguyen - 2455 Brookview Drive)
6. Do not think it is appropriate to put this in a residential area. This is being shoved down the
neighborhood's throat without a vote from the neighborhood. By the time we get this notice
you have already made up your mind to approve it as evidenced by the stakes already
marking its position. Why can't the pole be put in a commercial area like the one on the
Cartiva lot (in Landfall)? Why does it have to be in a neighborhood? It is ugly and it does
lower property values. Who wants to look out their window and see a monopole? (Edblom -
2458 Brookview Drive)
7. We are strongly opposed to the monopole being built in our area. It will have an impact on
our home values, the environment and possibly our health. Certainly no one wants one in
their backyard. They are unsightly. What a disappointment that the church cares so little for
this neighborhood that it sells us out for pieces of silver. (Ashley - 2466 Brookview Drive)
4
8. We do not want a monopole near our neighborhood as we did not want the water park. It
seems that these proposals always go through no matter the opposition. (Brosky - 2474
Brookview Drive)
9. If 2500 Hudson Place was your first choice, what were your second and third? Why is this
in a residential area and not out on the high side of 694 -494 and 94? What are we to
expect in the future when the 75 -foot pole is not high enough? It seems to me there are
plenty of other high locations that are not in someone's backyard! We already have a civil
defense siren which we accept. We get a water slide stuffed down our throats - which is
noisy before it has been used and the thought of the area on getting rid of the deer that
devastate our yards was ignored, we have bow and arrow hunting instead of sharp
shooting as was deemed the best at a council meeting by the residents. Our voices are
not heard, but our taxes go up. I'm not looking forward to looking at a 75' tower from my
kitchen window, where I spend a lot of time. (Kuhn 2481 Brookview Drive)
10. l for one would not like to see a telecommunications monopole put up on the church
property. I know the church could use the income it would generate, but 20 some years
ago when we bought this house, the church asked us to agree to stop the sound barrier
in front of the church. Reason being to keep the church visible from the freeway. For that
we have to listen to the freeway noise. This time I will not support them in this effort. I
can't believe with all the wide -open space around the 94 and 694 intersection there is not
a better site. Did they try Evergreen in Woodbury? (Utgaard - 2496 Brookview Drive)
Also see the three letters on pages 16, 17 and 18 for additional comments.
5
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 5.2 acres
Existing land use: Church and child care center
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: 3M campus across Hudson Place and Interstate 94
South: Single dwellings on Brookview Court
West: Single dwellings on Crestview Court
East: Single dwellings across Sterling Street
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: C (church) and S (school)
Zoning: R -1 (Single dwelling residential)
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36 -606 requires a CUP for a communications tower in a residential zoning district. The
ordinance requires a maximum height of 75 feet, however, the height may be increased to 100
feet if the tower is designed for the co- location of another provider's antenna.
Findings for CUP Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council must base approval of a CUP on nine standards for
approval. Refer to findings one through nine in the resolution on pages 20 and 21.
Application Date
The city received all the application materials for this request on March 31, 2000. State law
requires the city to take action on this request by May 29, 2000, unless the applicant agrees to a
time extension.
p: sect - 28/2500h uds. mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Site Plan (Enlarged)
5. Tower Elevation - Looking North
6. Applicant's statement
7. Applicant's criteria approval statement
8. Statement from Nelsons (2431 Brookview Drive)
9. Statement from Helminick (190 Sterling Street North)
10. Letter from Timothy Miller (2488 Brookview Drive)
11. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
12. Project Plans date - stamped April 26, 2000
rol-
• Attachment 1
•! ` •n Z a rwcvc� i C^ f%. •
•
CAM AVE . •'•
c 8MtM10 �ry l M 6RIiW0 A VE_
o t; • :�
• 7!h ST. �..+w..�
. E 7 th S'T..: �
" 0 •• .. •
*,I
♦ M
•+ AVE
.
a• o ♦.
•' E AVE.
. ♦ .
. •
N ♦••
E. Std ST. ' ;� •
2ss .'
Ix
• •..
t � FREW ONT
..
AVM �;•�
.:. CO~Y AVE. ° FRON TACE R0. z •
lw
COR C)
♦ 200 t (� E . W .
'. r+ 240 ., .
QZ �. 207 o .
N •
m ,
Wo tto
zu Lrolw
rul •. RD. . rGi
ti • V^ .
. � •.�.
WYM LA.
.• 7
• .WtES OR. ti �° •
? UppE t AFTON RD. •
Z
O
' N
•• or-AID �•
... p o • .
N • •
LOCATION MAP
Q
N
• Attachment 2
V
Q� G
1 49 4 '
r 144.4 .
- 7 97-1743- w• 13 4.6
M _ '. •.
Ine
f 31, � � � Q � �� A 7 c�•' _..� . � � �� '..�'_. ► 9t 1 tu+ fit o s
dl
230 ,.. r
►.
C4 �, ..� 1/ •. ' •�
� ac • d d ' 2510 y t;
o �
.11 ,.t
—{o 14
dl
7o V
oa
on ov
•.. vN ��
:,,0210
in
":
�CHRM
U l 13 2M .00 o T c4a� a
CHUB 1
X 4 1• ^ `�• / ' a C'.., 1 N N ( 2 H -
�b
0 4 2 4 89 190 Q
.�--
� � ,r'o �z� -, � 2431 � %� . , � y y = � ,Af> .0 ,o0
I UT
in
2 0 1 0
'. a
13 C3 r 80 •
f ' \00
�j / ` - 2v R
• �� ' > 179 I g. y am•. tam
Ad so a„ I 11 �2 1.3 4
ZS) •,•`�• iJ i �':' 1 • °100
S / '
. ( r
17
zi
Q
3 Lj
Z. , o
A
A
i O
. o
t I S .+sue , d
t �, C � I •735' _ ` ! �
go bo 1
(52�
I
1
41-
r
Z r
' r
b5 5 C I
9 13
c ♦��. ( II ( 1�
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
'Poo
Attachment 3
O
J
a --
N "no of the NMI
1/4 of Sic. 1 �^ `' N o. % HVL)SON 4� ;.6o 1 2 NW 1/4 of Sec. 1 `
0
2
ADDITIONAL TREES ` �-- 6x.00
PROPOSED -,-
DrLh
�► ' t, jroxbnot• S'rir R/W linc
O Trunk 12 obtoned
b MNDOT Map
ab F S8g'13 - 47`w 301.19
Sewer Eo••rn•nt fir, On Eawrnent Per • �
No. 1529317 CEASE �: 4oa, Na 164e803"
O .• � � _COMPOUN
PROPOSED MONOPOLE
PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TREES -_.
A,
O
/ -
R
C H
r ' 4 �
• cp
/ PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TREES ,
��
s Eoserr+ent �
• O
E / •
K
/ O
SITE PLAN
Al
SCALE: 1 " : 50' --0"
cRAPxUc SCALE
to .
c w tart �
1 inch • 60 f
F=
W
W
I Q
0 n'
Z
Ld
J
W
LM 0 M
M
W r
SITE PLAN
9
4
N
Attachment 4
PROPOSED ADDITIONAL TREES
`` t t• y .r � J1�v�
I
SEE TREE PLANTING DETAIL
ON SHEET A3. MULCH AND
AND EDGE AREA SURROUNDING
PROPOSED TREE PLANTINGS = �• '�
AUSTRIAN AND NORWAY PINE
SHALL BE 6' -0' MIN (TYP)
3"00 Z 1
15'x15'
EOUIPMENT
PLATFORM
0
z
6' -0' FENCE
W/0 BARB WIRE
EDGE OF 30' -0'
30'-Ow LEASE AREA 3 �t
10,00
o �
r
S
3
1 �
34.92
1 �
1
1
1
1 !
1
1
r !
! e
ON SHEET A3. MULCH AND
AND EDGE AREA SURROUNDING
PROPOSED TREE PLANTINGS
AUSTRIAN AND NORWAY PINE
SHALL BE 6'-0' MIN (TYP)
75' L40NOPOLE (EXPANDABLE TO 100' -0')
(BY OTHERS) (ANTENNAS NOT SHOWN
4 FOR CLARITY, SEE 2/A2 FOR ANTENNA PLAN)
r
1
KING LOT
pAR
. I .
r !
SITE PLAN
(ENLARGED)
10
i
N
Attachment 5
to,oi� TOWER ELEVATION
Q�- �Loqx�lmo =ovm��
11
4
N
T--ARM ANTENNA
MOUNT (TYP)
E ELEVATION OF SPRI PCs ii ii n n
- --- - --- - - -
ANTENNAS i
u u L:
o J
ri
PHASE 1 BUILD -OUT MICROFLECT TRI- BRACKET
o
ANTENNA (TYP.) I ASSEMBLY
I
I
i
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
i
i
I
i PROPOSED
75' -0'
I MONOPOLE
BY OTHERS
I
STS r s
BTS r , I
ICE BRIDGE
BY SPRINT PCs
I
i
(
PROPOSED
FOUNDATION
i
(
BY OTHERS
t
6' -0' CHAIN LW
I FENCE
W/O WO WARE
EQUIPMENT
CONCRETE PIER
PLATFORM
(Typ)
30 DEEP COMP
AGGREGATE SURFACM+IC OVER
TOWER ELEVATION
GROUND STABILIZATION FABRIC
T
A3
LOOKING NORTH
to,oi� TOWER ELEVATION
Q�- �Loqx�lmo =ovm��
11
4
N
05/12/2000 11:37 6122536366 FOURSCORE PAGE 02
Attachment 6
OPENING STATEMENT
i
i
In its pursuit of providing the highest quality digital wireless se i ce,.- Sprint .PCS r....
( 4 `Sprint ") proposes to construct a wireless com umcation facility located at
Hudson Place, Maplewood, MN, within a Residential Zoning District. Sprint will be
leasing a 3 0' x 3 0' parcel of land on the subj ca parcel. The entire wireless facility will
be located within the leased parcel. The facility will include a 75 -foot monopole
structure and equipment cabinets. Sprint is seeking approval (at the City's request) of a
Conditional Use Permit for up to a l 00 -foot structure to allow for another provider to co-
locate at a future date without requiring another CLIP application and public hearing.
Sprint has agreed to build its monopole "ith the structuW suppoxt necessary to support a
25 -Foot addition to the monopole and antennas regardless of whether the Conditional Use
Permit is approved up to 75 feet (the height of the tower) or up to 100 feet. The facility
will be entirely enclosed by a 6' chain link fence.
As part of Sprint's ongoing development and improvement of its wireless
network, system en.gm' cers have identified the need for a new Facility to serve the area
surrounding the intersection of highways 94 and 694. The required location for the new
Facility was determined by computer modeling that evaluates population density,
topography and current antenna system capacity. The potential location area is known as
the "Search Ring" This Search Ring represents the area in which a facility must be
located to allow it to function as an integral unit in the antenna grid system. Ater a
thorough search of the ring the site located at 2500 Hudson Place was found to be the
most appropriate based on technological, practical and aesthetic concerns. while
locating on the rooftop of the nearby 3M building would have been an ideal site,
unfortunately due to 3M's concern about interference with their technical research and
development, we were unable to secure a lease at that location.
In addition to the technical requirements of the facilities' location, Sprint selects
the location that meets the requirements of the local zoning code. Pursuant to section 36-
600 (5)(b)) of the Maplewood Zoning Ordinance, the location of this facility on church
property is a preferred primary land use. These two Factors make the church candidate
the most appropriate choice, based on the constraints of locating within the Search Ring.
The proposed facility will not cause harm to the public health, safety, morals or
general welfare. As a condition of its license from the FCC, Sprint's technology does not
cause interference with any other forth of communication, whether public or private. To
the contrary, Sprint's technology provides vital communications in emergency situations
and will be commonly used by local residents and emergency personnel to protect the
general public's health, safety and welfare.
Wireless telephone technology provides many benefits to the communities it
serves. These services include, but are not limited to, the following:
911 program allowing motorists to summon aid and report dangerous situations.
12
05/12/2000 11:37 6122536363 FOURSCORE PAGE 03
* Support for emergency services by providing wireless communications to
paramedics, firefighters, and law enforcement agenci
i A backup system to the land -line system in the event of a natural or man -made
disaster.
+ Communication capabilities in remote areas, enh the s of travelers by
allowing immediate access to emergency assistance.
* Support for the busy lives of people in the area reducing stress and increasing
productiv
Site Analysis and History
During Sprint's site selection process it first detennines what the requirements are
from the governing municipality. Once informed, the acquisition specialists search the
area designated by the engineers at Sprint. In the City of (Maplewood church property is
a preferred candidate for Conditional Use Permits. To uti lize church property Sprint is
proposing to utilize the grounds of Christ United Methodist Church located at 2500
Hudson dace.
In Sprint's search for an acceptable location in the area surrounding the
intersection Highways 94 and 694, only a few potential sites were discovered. An
existing AT &T tower is located near the proposed site. This tower, however is outside
the Search Ring and did not provide the coverage needed by the Sprint engineers for the
new facility. The coverage is essential to the operation of the new facility within the
antenna grid system. There is a Holiday Inn located at 2201 Burris Avenue, in St. Paul
which was also evaluated but again, was outside the Search Ring and did not provide
adequate coverage. Therefore, to meet the coverage and capacity needs of the
surrounding area, the best feasible location for the facility is on the church, property at
2500 Hudson dace.
Since our application was filed on March 31, 2000, we have revised the site
location twice. In r to ne ighboring residents' concerns regarding the proximity of
the proposed site to their hones, Sprint, the Landowner and the City first agreed on a. site
which was 100 feet further North than the initial proposed site. At the May l Planning
Commission meeting, the neighbors requested that the site be moved even further North
by approximately an additional 100 feet. Sprint complied with this request as it met their
engineering requizernents and the Landowner agreed to the relocation. Th e third location
was th en rec ommended for approval at the M 9 Community Des Review Board
meeting. Sprint has revised the site plans accordingly. In addition, to rninirnize the
visibility of the monopole, Sprint has agreed to plant trees, in the species, number, size
and location, requested by the City, which are reflected in the most recent drawings.
Finally, at the request of the Community Design, Review Board and/or neighbo�ng
presidents, Sprint has revised its initial plan to remove the one foot high barb wire from
the top of the fence-
13
Attachment 7
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
The Conditional Use will conform to the applicable regulations of Residential Districts.
Pursuant to the Maplewood Zoning Ordinance, Sections 36 -66 (b)(3) and 36 -606, the
proposed use requires a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed monopole will be built to
conform to all Maplewood Zoning Ordinance provisions, including the regulations
concerning height, setbacks, and landscaping. The Conditional Use will be in harmon
with the spirit and intent of the Maplewood Zoning Ordinance. Wireless telephones
provide an alternate communication system which has repeatedly proven its effectiveness
in emergency situations and is commonly being utilized by police and fire departments to
protect the general public's health, safety and welfare. Therefore, the granting of the
Conditional Use will be in conformance with the general and specific purposes imposed by
the City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
Due to the minimal size of the leased parcel and the nature of the surrounding uses, there
will be little impact on the character of the locality, with no adverse effect on existing or
future development in the area. This is also supported by section 36 -600 (5)(b) of the
Ordinance which designates this location as a preferred land use.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
The proposed facility consists of a monopole structure that has very little aesthetic impact
on the surrounding area. This structure is similar to a light standard. The proposed
facility will consist of a monopole antenna structure not to exceed 75 feet and
accompanying unstaffed equipment cabinets. The entire facility will be located within a
30230 parcel of land. With such a small footprint and its location on church property, a
preferred primary land use area (see section 36 -600 (5)(b)), this facility will have little
impact on the use and enjoyment of property in the immediate vicinity, nor will there be an
adverse effect on property values within the neighborhood. To the contrary, enhanced
wireless communications will have a positive influence on the development of this area.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor,
fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water run -off, vibration, general, unsightliness,
electrical interference or other nuisances.
Due to the diminutive size of the facility, it will not interfere with an adequate supply of
light and air to adjacent property, increase the danger of fire, nor will it substantially
diminish or impair the enjoyment or aesthetics of the neighborhood. The proposed facility
14
will not injure the public health, safety, morals or general welfare. Wireless technology
does not interfere with any other form of communication, whether public or private. To
the contrary, wireless technology provides vital communications in emergency situations
and will commonly be used by local residents and emergency personnel to protect the
general public's health, safety and welfare.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
Sprint's PCS facilities are unstaffed and entirely self- monitored. Therefore, there will be
no impact on the existing traffic nor will there be any traffic hazards generated.
Maintenance personnel will visit the facility at most once a month. Access will be provided
via existing entrances. Thus the safety and efficiency of public streets and highways will be
maintained.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools, and
parks.
The only utilities necessary for this facility are telephone and electricity, both of which are
readily available. Because the facility is unstaffed, there will be no impact to the existing
traffic patterns nor will there be any need for additional access roads. No drainage,
sanitation, refuse removal, parks, library, or school services will be necessary for this
facility. Existing police and fire protection are more than adequate to provide security for
the facility.
4.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
As stated above, existing .police and fire protection are more than adequate to provide
security for the facility. Therefore, there will be to additional requirements at public cost
for public facilities and services.
8. The use would ' ' e the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development des*gn.
Due to the fact that Sprint PCS has been sensitive in selecting a site that will minimize the
impact on the surrounding property, their facility will be compatible with the existing
environment and will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of any natural, scenic,
or historic feature of significant importance.
9. The use would cause ' ' adverse environmental effects.
Again, because of the facilities small size, it will not injure the public health or safety and
will pose little, if any, adverse environmental concerns.
15
Attachment 8
We oppose the above conditional use permit for Sprint's PCS Telecommunication Monopole. We feel it does impact the
character of the residential neighborhood surrounding the Christ United Methodist Church property site. There is nothing
higher than a two -story dwelling anywhere in this area. Consequently, a 75 foot tower or "monopole" would be out of place
and unpleasant aesthetically, as well as having a definite effect on property values in the area. We are sure that Sprint would
like to believe this structure would have no threat to public health, but we do not believe they really know at this point.
Wireless technology is still relatively new enough that long term effects on health and environment cannot really be proven one
way or the other. This neighborhood was intended to be residential use and the taxpayers of the surrounding properties bought
into this community in good faith that that is what it would remain. We believe the church may have seen this offer as an
answer to financial concerns they are experiencing as a congregation. However, they must remember that as our neighbor, if
it is not good for the entire area as a whole., it should be a consideration for them to rethink their position and motives for
agreeing to the proposal. Their building not only houses a congregation part- time but also houses a 4 day per week Nursery
School for pre- school children on the property. We do not believe the site is necessarily compatible. If the area to be served
reaches from our area to 1 -94 and 1 -694, there must be better commercial or public .,grounds that could be chosen for this use.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this issue. Jacque A. & Diane K. Nelson
�I
JACQUE $DIANE NELSON
ST. A� B�, MINNESOTA b5119
651- 73J —qoAJo
16
Attachment 9
Sprint PCS Telecommunication Monopole Request:
We do not approve of a conditionally use permit for Sprint PCS. We do not
agree with Sprints statement that this so called small footprint, which is 30 30'
with a enclosed 8' chain link fence topped with one foot high barb wire, plus a 75'
pole with antennas will not in anyway have little impact on the enjoyment of a
wildlife type property. Nor adversely effect property values within the
neighborhood. What proof or guarantee do we have that this statement is true.
Especially referring to property values. In Sprints opening statement, one of the
benefits we would receive is, and I quote. Support for the busy lives of people in
the area reducing stress and increasing productivity.. Sprint must be talking about
the 3M people, and 3M said they don't want the facility on their property, nor do
we want it near ours. Give us a break, I'am 66 years old, and lived in this area for
24 years.) don't want or need to look at a 75 FT tower as the sun sets in the
west..
In Sprints site analysis they state that AT &T has an existing tower but outside
the search area. What is the size of this search area? There is a lot of open land
near 94 & 694. My other question would be, does each wireless company put up
tower for service coverage, rather then share facilities. Sprint also states the
facility will not injure the public health. Is there any radiated energy coming off
these towers, if so ,what is the peak power energy output and range?
THANK YO d
� N & JUDY HELMINICK
190 Sterling ST N.
MAPLEWOOD
651 -738 -0110
17
Kenneth Roberts, Associate Planner
Office of Community Development, City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood MN 55109 -2797
April 8, 2000
Re: Sprint PCS Telecommunications Monopole - 2500 Hudson Place
This letter represents our objection to the proposed installation near our home of a PCS Cellular
Communications Tower by Sprint. Please find herein our comments and concerns.
In reviewing the Opening Statement and other materials included with the Neighborhood Survey sent to
us by your office, we find that we have a couple of sincere reservations about the proposed installation
which remain unaddressed.
Most notably, we are concerned that this communications transmission facility might indeed interfere
with other communications which we use or depend upon. The Opening Statement attempts to address
this issue with the sentence:
'As a condition of its license from the FCC, Sprint's technology does not cause interference with any
other form of communication, whether public or private.'
Frankly, this seems a weak and ineffective statement. Rather that a simple declarative, to whit: "Sprint
guarantees that this facility will in no way interefere with any of your communications.", the sentence in
the Opening Statments quoted above seems to more circle the issue than to address it head on. That
fact, coupled with the fact that 3M apparently does not regard that sentence as sufficient assurance for
themselves, leaves us with a suspicion that this facility might in fact cause communications problems
for us.
One specific communication form we are concerned about is computer wireless networking. We have
and depend upon a computer network in our home for both personal and business use. While not yet
deployed, we have been planning to expand this network through the use of wireless networking
technology. We are concerned that the Sprint PCS monopole could interfere with that.
w
If it were possible to get a direct statement from Sprint to us stating that they will interefere with NONE
of our communications - telephone, television, radio, computer, etc - and that Sprint would guarantee
p �
remedy in the event of such interference, we would withdraw our objection.
Thanks for taking the time to both inform us and listen to our feedback.
Sincerely,
X� f
Donna & Tim Miller
19
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
Attachment 11
WHEREAS, Ms. Wendy Metchnek, representing Sprint PCS, applied for a conditional use
permit to install up to a 100- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2500 Hudson Place. The legal description
is:
All that part of the East Y2 of the. NW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 28, Range 22, described as
follows:
Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of Section 1, Township 28, Range 22, thence Westerly
along the North line of said Section 1, a distance of 474.9 feet to a point, thence
Southwesterly by deflection angle of 60 48' to the left, a distance of 460.39 feet to a point;
thence Southeasterly by a deflection angle of 110 54' to the left, a distance of 711.55 feet to
a point on the North - South Quarter line of said Section 1; thence Northerly along said North -
South Quarter line by a deflection angle of 98 50' to the left, a distance of 505.13 feet to the
point of beginning. Subject to Highway 12 right -of -way and Great Lakes Pipeline easement.
In Section 1, Township 28, Range 22 in Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 01- 28 -22 -21 -0001)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On May 1, 2000, the planning commission recommended approval of this request.
2. The city council held a public hearing on May 22, 2000. City staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
Operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
20
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plans dated May 15, 2000, as approved by the city.
The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant or owner shall allow the collocation of other providers' telecommunications
equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions.
5. Any antenna that is not used for a year shall be deemed abandoned and may be required
to be removed.
6. The applicant or Sprint shall post a bond or other guarentee with the city to ensure proper
removal of the antenna and monopole and the restoration of the site.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 2000.
21
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, MAY 1, 2000
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. Sprint PCS Telecommunications Monopole Conditional Use Permit (2500 Hudson Place)
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts said the correct street
is Hudson Place. Commissioner Trippler asked if it Was staff's interpretation, based on the 1996
telecommunications act or a ruling that the city was involved in, that the applicant does not have
to demonstrate a need for this tower. Mr. Roberts conceded that this was conceivable but not
likely. He said other avenues were checked for antenna location, including 3M, the McKnight
water tower and Holiday Inn, but these sites did not meet Sprint's needs. Commissioner Trippler
asked if Sprint specifically required a pole and how they showed this requisite. Mr. Roberts said
the applicant only stated that they needed an "antenna facility in this location." He said the
copies of reports from Sprint's field engineers indicated that the other sites would not be
adequate. Commissioner Trippler felt the applicant wanted a pole in this neighborhood and,
after looking at various sites, chose this one. He didn't feel that this told him how they arrived at
the decision that there was a need for the monopole at this location.
Commissioner Frost asked. what options the planning commission and the city council have,
based on the 1996 law and Maplewood's ordinance. Mr. Roberts said there were "very few, if
any" options. Commissioner Pearson asked about the failure rate of towers in the event of
storms, etc. Melinda Coleman, director of community development, said the only incident she
heard of was during Hurricane Andrew one tower "crinkled" a small amount.
Commissioner Ledvina asked about collocation. Mr. Roberts said Sprint determined that there
was not a pole in this vicinity that would meet their needs. He pointed out that these installations
were very expensive and didn't think a company would incur that expense if it wasn't necessary.
Commissioner Trippler wondered about church property as a preferred candidate for these
conditional use permits in relation to other sites. Mr. Roberts said the #1 preferred site is
industrial /commercial.
Commissioner Mueller questioned the possibility of these towers causing health problems for
nearby residents or interfering with other wireless technology. Mr. Roberts answered that he
has not seen any news publications that would indicate a health- related issue. He said that 3M
and U.S. West did some testing, in relation to a request a few years ago for a tower by the 3M
property, and found no interference. Mr. Roberts felt that 3M did not want the tower on their site
because they did not need the revenue nor want the security issues.
Brian Barrett was present representing Sprint PCS. He said their first choices for antenna
location on existing structures in the area did not fill the requirements of their engineers.
According to Mr. Barrett, they are building a 75 -foot tower with a capability to reach 100 feet to
allow for collocation. This is at the request of Mr. Roberts. The monopole will not be lit, will not
emit any noise or vibrations, and will be covered by a mature growth of trees. Mr. Barrett said
there will be additional plantings to screen the equipment.
Commissioner Trippler asked Mr. Barrett for his Opinion on the economic impact if such a tower
was placed in his neighborhood. Commissioner Rossbach felt questions about whether a 30-
foot tree would hide a 75 -foot tower and economic impact were inappropriate. Commissioner
Trippler responded that one of the criteria for conditional use permit approval was that the use
would not deteriorate property values. Mr. Rossbach said no reports indicate that these towers
diminish "property values anywhere across the country." Ms. Coleman referred to the previous
tower proposal at another location, about which Maplewood was taken to court, and said
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 05 -01 -00
testimony was given by a real estate appraiser who felt the property" would be impacted
negatively by the tower." This statement was struck by the judge who determined that it was
inappropriate for the city to make findings based on this. Mr. Trippler asked if it was
inappropriate to question 2, 3 4 8 and 9 of the conditional use permit criteria. He felt it was
useless to have the hearings for a monopole if nothing could be done. Ms. Coleman believed
that this was basically what the commission is required to do based on what the federal and
district courts have indicated. Ms. Coleman said that some of these issues are very complex
and many times county and state courts and federal laws impact and supersede the city's rights.
Jean Ashley, 2466 Brookview Drive, described her neighborhood. She said they are requesting
two things: 1) move the monopole as far north as possible on the site, and 2) keep the
monopole at the 70 feet as originally stated in the letter to the residents. Ms. Ashley felt
describing the pole as "diminutive" was a misnomer because "this will be the largest facility of
poles on a church in Maplewood." She referred to an antenna located at another church that
had "two hummers" and contended that they "do hum." She said this pole will have "three
hummers."
Commissioner Rossbach asked Ms. Ashley if she had considered the possibility of other poles
being placed in this vicinity, even on this same site. Ms. Ashely said they have talked about this
and decided there was no other site available and it was unlikely that the church would allow
another pole. Mr. Rossbach pointed out that people have "complained vehemently" at every
location. He thought Ms. Ashley's requests were "very reasonable." Ms. Ashley showed
pictures of various monopoles. Mr. Barrett commented that Sprint's equipment does not hum.
Robert Schlenz, a registered professional engineer and employee of 3M, said he came to speak
about the impact that this facility could possibly have on their equipment. He was present as a
representative of 3M. He said their interest had to do with the "size signal" that reaches 3M
equipment from the telecommunication transmitters. Mr. Schlenz was concerned that, if this
monopole is constructed as planned, 3M be notified of any changes so they can take necessary
steps to protect their laboratories. He said they declined to have this tower located on their
property because of its closeness signal strengths get smaller as the equipment is located
further away. According to Mr. Schlenz, these towers emit approximately a 1900 megaherz
signal. If this tower is moved further north on the site, 3M would like to know the amount of
power that is going to be transmitted, the kind of antenna, and the modulation that is involved.
Mr. Schlenz said the way the antennas were aimed was more crucial than the placement of the
pole on the site. Mr. Barrett noted that 3M is actually one of the areas that is requesting this
facility.
Terry Degraw, chairman of the board of trustees at Christ United Methodist Church, said he has
been working on the lease agreement. He said the humming sound comes from a fan unit or air
conditioning unit that is used to cool the electrical load that runs the antenna. Mr. Degraw
favored moving the antenna to the north. He said he was "kind of shocked" to find out that the
tower could go 100 -feet -high and the lease agreement was for 75 feet.
Commissioner Frost asked Mr. Barrett's opinion about moving the pole further north on the site.
Mr. Barrett said it made no difference to them. Mr. Roberts was concerned that moving the
pole 30 feet from the northern property line would make it more visible from the houses to the
northeast of the church. He said the location choice was picked in order to increase the
distance from the homes on Brookview, as well as working with the trees in the area and using
the church building as a screen for the Sterling Street homes. Commissioner Thompson thought
the community design review board "would have an obligation to be as thoughtful" with
shrubbery, etc. Various options for placement of the monopole on the church property were
discussed.
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 05 -01 -00
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit to allow up to a 75 -foot-
tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment. This approval is for the property at
2500 Hudson Place. The city bases this approval on the findings required by the ordinance
and is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plans dated April 26, 2000, with the following
changes to the location of the pole: the pole shall be located as far north on the property
as possible, still being functional for Sprint's uses for communications and incorporating
the existing trees and the church property by the northwest corner of their parking lot to
help hide the pole. Sprint should still look at installing additional trees and shrubs, placed
to block the view. as much as possible of the pole from the houses on Sterling Avenue.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Commissioner Pearson seconded.
Commissioner Ledvina asked if there was a concern about collocation because the motion is to
reduce the height of the pole. Commissioner Rossbach had no objection to collocation as long
as it could be done with a 75 -foot monopole. Mr. Rossbach commended the area residents for
their ability to "pull its thoughts together into something cohesive" instead of just appearing at the
planning commission meeting to object to the monopole. Commissioner Frost assumed that 3M
and Sprint would get together to work out the technical specifications of the installation.
Mr. Barrett said that typically another carrier can collocate on a 75 -foot pole. A pole has to be
designed specifically to extend beyond 75 feet and the size of the foundation would need to be
increased. There was discussion about the need for another tower in this area and whether the
tower should be built with the capability of extending to 100 feet to allow for more collocation.
Staff confirmed that, if the monopole was designed so that it could go up to 100 feet but only
approved for 75 feet at this time, additional city approval would be needed to allow use of the
100 -foot tower.
Commissioner Ledvina made a friendly amendment to include:
4. The applicant or owner shall allow the co- location of other providers' telecommunications
equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions.
Mr. Roberts pointed out that this item did not address height, only co- location. Chairperson
Fischer said this would only be allowed within the 75 -foot limit. Commissioner Rossbach
accepted the amendment. Commissioner Frost clarified that the motion was that the facility be
designed to be able to go to 100 feet, but only currently approve it for 75 feet. If it does go
higher than 75 feet, another public hearing will be required.
Commissioner Rossbach asked that the minutes of this meeting reflect that the intent was that
the monopole would not be raised to 100 feet unless the neighborhood thought this was the best
choice at the time. This was not a part of the motion but only thoughts of some commissioners.
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 05 -01 -00
The motion passed.
Ayes Fischer, Frost, Ledvina, Mueller,
Pearson, Rossvach, Thompson
Nays Trippler
Commissioner Trippler stated that he voted against this application because he saw no evidence
to show that "this request would not violate Conditions 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9 of this conditional use
permit resolution."
Commissioner Trippler made a motion that the Planning Commission recommend to the city of
Maplewood that they not submit to, the commission any further requests for siting any further
monopoles since the commission apparently has no authority to approve or disapprove the
request. He said this was a total waste of the commissioners' time. Commissioner Rossbach
noted that conditional use permits allow uses with conditions but do not allow the commission to
stop things from happening.
The motion died because there was no second.
,. - - - _ .. .�• ,. , /`_ _ : 1 __ •. ^' 1 .. , -
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Y 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, - MINNESOTA
MAY 9 2000
VI. DESIGN REVIEW .
A. Sprint PCS Monopole, 2500 Hudson Place
- creta Tom Ekstrand ' resented the staff report. - Chairperson Ledvina asked; with the
Se ry p p
revised location of the pole, if there was a. concern for the residents to the west. Mr. Ekstrand
said the trees were quite thick on that side. Since the homes in ahis area are at t - a lower
elevation round screening would not be a, benefit. Mr._ Ekstrand said this installation is a 30 j
x 30, fenced -in site with a monopole and ground equipment:
David Huihui, a representative of Sprint's consultant group, reviewed the staff report and had
no q uestions or concerns about the conditions. A couple of. the boardmembers expressed
,
concern about the barbed wire proposed for the top. of the fence. Mr. Huihui maintained that
the barbed wire served a security function and it was "pretty much a standard thing on. all of
the compounds. Because the height of the fence has been shortened to six feet, this was F
even more of a consideration. Staff suggested that an angled bare wire at the top of the ,
chainlink fence might make the barrier sufficiently difficult to cross. Various options'were },
discussed by staff and the board.
Terry DeGraw, chairman of the board of trustees at Chri United Methodist Church, had -
similar concerns about the barbed -wire fence. He viewed ten different monopole sites and
only two had fences. Mr. DeGraw was "led to believe that the barbed wire could possibly be"..
ed. Secrets Ekstrand reminded the board that conditional use per
are reviewed
dropped. Secretary _ _
after one Year. If there was just cause, the applicant could choose to add the barbed wire
after this year review. He also suggested that the recommendation could be worded such Y
that the applicant could add the barbed wire if trespassing or vandalism occurred before the r:
one-year time. Boardmember LaCasse strongly recommended an angled top wire instead ;of
the barbed wire.
Boardmember Johnson moved the Community Design Review Board
h site and design fans date- April 26, 2000, for up to- a 100- foot -tall
_ B. Approve the ' s g p p p _
telecommunications monopole and equipment to the property at 2500 Hudson Place. A
Approval is based on the finding required by code and subject to the applicant doing the -
pp g q _
following: '
1. Rep this review in two years if the city has not issued permits for this project. '
it issues a buildi - pit staff must approve a landscaping plan for
20 Before the city g Y
the ro ert This plan shall show planting of a mix of Austrian Pine and Norway
p p Y p .
Pine trees to the west of the existing garage, on the north side _of the proposed lease
area and northeast of the existing church building. (These are the areas noted for -
additional tree planting on the plans date-stamped. May, 15, 2000.) ,These trees are - to
hel p screen the base area. These trees shall be at least 8 feet tall, balled and
burlapped and shall be planted in staggered rows as shown on the proposed plans.
3. The
access drive between the tower lease area and the existing parkin lot shall be
g
= paved with bituminous.
City of Maplewood
Official Sign -Up Sheet
By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the
Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes.
Name (first &last) - please print
Address
F "_,�
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
�
DG
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Opp
AGENDA 1TEM NO N , NOW
MEMORANDUM
TO: Acting City Manager
FROM: Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Maplewood Fire Station (Clarence Street)
DATE: May 15, 2000
INFORMATION
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Staff published a public hearing notice for May 22, 2000 to review design elements to the new fire
station. It was anticipated that after bids were received, some changes may be necessary to either
the building or other site improvements if bids came in over estimates.
As it turns out, the bids came in incomplete and we are not in a position to move forward on this
project. However, because the agenda was published and public notice was sent out, we could
have residents come to the meeting with interest in this project.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city manager indicate to the audience that staff has incomplete
information at this time and that they will be re- notified if and when the matter goes to city
council for any changes to the new fire station. There will be no action taken at this time.
AGENDA ITEM
Action by Couml
AGENDA REPORT
Date
Endorsed
TO: City Manager Modified
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Rejected
SUBJECT: Award of Bids,Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, City Project 99 -13
DATE: May 12, 2000
Bids for the Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets project are scheduled to be opened
at 10:00 a.m. on Friday, May 19, 2000.
A tabulation of those bids, a staff recommendation, as well as the corresponding
resolution will be made available with a supplementary report, to be inserted into the
agenda packet at that time.
CIVIC
AGENDA ITEM J.
AGENDA REPORT Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
TO: City Manager Modified
�
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Rejecte4
SUBJECT: Hazelwood Street Improvements, Project 99 -07 -- Assessment Appeals
DATE: May 15, 2000
The city received ten objections to the proposed assessment for this project. Copies of the
written objections have been attached for reference. Staff has reviewed each written
objection and makes the following recommendations:
10 2460 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -13 -0098, The property owner feels that the
assessment is too much based on the amount of use by non - residents. Appraisals have
been done in the past to set precedence for assessment rates on such projects. The
$4000 /unit street assessment and $600 /unit drainage assessment are similar to the
assessments charged on past projects. On this project, the total amount of the
assessments will only pay for approximately 1/3 of. the total project cost, with the balance
of the project being paid from other funding sources. This method of assessment, and
the rate of assessment is consistent with the other properties in the area and with past
projects. In the absence of any other arguments, staff feels the proposed assessments
are appropriate.
It is recommended that no action be taken to change the proposed assessment for
2460 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -13 -00980
2. 2451 Germain Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -13 -0486, The owner of this property has objected
to the assessment based on the current use of the property. The property is a large
parcel (1.52 Acres), and lies adjacent to half of a platted cul -de -sac. Based on the size
of neighboring properties the parcel would be dividable into 6 single family parcels. The
parcel does not front the Hazelwood Street project and is proposed to be assessed for
storm sewer improvements only. This parcel has a proposed assessment of $600 /unit x
6 units = $3600. The method of assessment is consistent with the city's usual procedure
for assessing for storm sewer. The drainage from this parcel flows directly west towards
Hazelwood Street and has had an impact on those properties to the west. The storm
sewer infrastructure proposed for this project was designed and sized to accommodate
the drainage from this parcel.
It is recommended that no action be taken to change the proposed assessment for
2451 Germain Street, PIN: 1049 -22 -13 -00869
3. 2555 Hazelwood Street. PIN's: 10- 29 -22 -21 -0004. - 0005. & - 0008 , The owner, Holy
Redeemer Church, has requested a revision based on the large number of lots for which
they are being assessed. The frontage of the parcels along Hazelwood total 618 feet.
Under the city's standard procedure, 618 feet is divided by 75 to establish. the number of
single family equivalent units at 8.24. The parcels are proposed to be assessed a total of
8 units. Special assessessments to property are treated equally whether owned by a
non - profit institution or not. Special assessments are leveied where there is benefit to a
property including property owned by a non - profit institution, which is exempt from
taxation.
It is recommended that no action be taken to change the proposed assessment for
2555 Hazelwood Street, PIN's: 10- 29 -22 -21 -0004 -0005, & -00088
4. 2410 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -13 -0051 The property owner has requested a
Disability Hardship Deferment, because of complications from heart surgery, and not
being sure when they would return to work. Forms for the disability hardship deferment
would need to be completed by the property owner in order to qualify them for such a
deferment.
It is recommended that the city council approve disability hardship for the
property at 2410 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 1049 -22 -13 -0051, upon a qualified
submittal to the city clerk of the proper disability hardship documentation by the
property owner.
5. 2615 Bittersweet Lane, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -11 -0028 The property owner has requested a
Disability Hardship Deferment. Forms for the disability hardship deferment would need
to be completed by the property owner in order to qualify them for such a deferment.
It is recommended that the city council approve disability hardship for the
property at 2615 Bittersweet Lane, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -11 -0028, upon a qualified
submittal to the city clerk of the proper disability hardship documentation by the
property owner.
6. 2566 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -12 -0046 The owner has requested a senior
citizen deferment based on financial hardship. Forms for the senior citizen deferment
would need to be completed by the property owner in order to qualify them for such a
deferment.
It is recommended that the city council approve senior citizen deferment for the
property at 2566 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -13 -0046, upon a qualified
submittal to the city clerk of the proper disability hardship documentation by the
property owner.
7. 2420 Hazelwood Street. PIN: 10-29-22-13-0052, The property owner had not checked
any specific request for consideration, only that they were on a fixed income, retired and
disabled with back problems and unable to work. The city council may, however, wish to
make their own interpretation and consider the property for a senior citizen or disability
hardship deferment, which ever may apply. If consideration is given, the property owner
should submit to the city clerk, the qualified disability hardship documentation.
It is recommended that no action be taken to change the assessment proposed for
2420 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10-29-22 -13 -0052, due to lack of information on the
assessment hearing appeal form.
8. 2467 Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -24 -0013 This parcel is a large lot, (2.28 Ac),
that in theory could be subdivided. Based on a lot size of 163.5' by 610' deep, the city's
usual procedure is to treat the frontage on this parcel as 2 - 75' units, and thus assess 2
units for street and 2 units for storm. Also, in the interest of protecting the new street
from the possibility of a utility trench in the near future, it had been proposed to install a
sewer service stub to the vacant portion of this property.
The current property owner states that they do not wish to divide the lot. The City of
Maplewood also does not wish to install a sewer service which may never be used, nor
does the city want to put the street in jeopardy from utility trench work before the street
reaches a particular age.
The city council might consider treating this lot as a single unit, and assessing it at a
single unit rate. In addition, no sewer service would be installed to the vacant portion of
the lot. Subdividing of the property would become a cost disadvantage to the current or
a future owner, due to the limited access to sewer and the restoration requirements of
the new street. A subdivision should be denied by the city until such time the age and
condition of the street would justify an open cut utility trench. This option would literally
prohibit the current or future owners to a lot split anytime in the near future.
It is recommended that the city council reduce the assessment for 2467
Hazelwood Street, PIN: 1049 -2244 -0013 by $6450, from 2 x $4000 + 2 x $600 + 1 x
$1850 = $11,050.00 to 1 x $4000 + 1 x $600 + 1 X $0 = $4600, with the requirement
that a future lot split request be denied until after such time the age and condition
of the street would justify an open cut utility trench, as approved by the city
engineer.
9. 1522 E. Brooks Avenue, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -24 -0012 The owner states that the property is
being assessed two units and that they will not subdivide the property. The frontage on
Hazelwood is 187' with a lot depth of 150'. The same conditions and circumstances
apply here with this parcel as with the fore mentioned property at 2467 Hazelwood.
Any decision regarding the assessment should apply to both parcels.
It is recommended that the city council reduce the assessment for 1522 E. Brooks
Avenue, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -24 -0012, by $6450, from 2 x $4000 + 2 x $600 + 1 x $1850 =
$ 11,050.00 to 1 x $4000 + 1 x $600 + 1 X $0 = $4600, with the requirement that a
future lot split request be denied until after such time the age and condition of the
street would justify an open cut utility trench, as approved by the city engineer.
10. 2480 Hazelwood Avenue, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -13 -0097 The property owner has requested a
revision to the assessment for the sewer service stub. An assessment of $1850 was
proposed to be assessed to the property for a sewer service stub. The property is large
and likely to develop into multiple units in the future. For those reasons a sewer main
will be installed to the right -of -way line, with the option of being extended in the future by
a private developer. In the future, the property owner would actually provide easements
and extend the sewer main into their property. At which time they choose to subdivide or
develop their property, the sewer service and sewer main would be constructed by the
property owner and at their expense.
It is recommended that the city council reduce the assessment for 2480
Hazelwood Street, PIN: 10- 29 -22 -13 -0097, by $1850, from 2 x $4000 + 7 x $600 + 1 x
$1850 = $14,050.00 to 2 x $4000 + 7 x $600 + 1 X $0 = $12,200800 ,
CIVIC
asn
Attachments
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
HAZELWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99 -07
Address of assessed parcel
Property identification number.
W 40
(12 digit number)
Do ou wish to address the city council tonight? ❑
� tY 9
es No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
(check one):
a. ❑ Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
b. ❑ Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
C. El Cancellation of assessment
d. K Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
L j I IR 41 !tL4it.W
or
-00
Print Name Signat Date
-.2 q 0 fl 14 /
Address of Property Owner Code Telephone
mo
':;r,; t a q
Ic �7=
Zip
State
AL
uw
Ll
Ir
May 3, 2000 _ .
i Pin 10-29-22-13-0086
Vansee Yang _
865 Century Avenue N. #2
3!
-Maplewood, - MN 55119
City of Maplewood
Department of Public Works - - -
ij 1830 E. County Road B :
Maplewood, MN 55109
To Whom It May Concern:
LV
ansee Yang, am writing this letter as an objection to the assessment of Project 99 -07
Hazelwood Street Improvement. The assessment entails that I should pay for six
properties, four of which are garden lots. I recently purchased the property of 2451 .
Germain Street in August of 1999 and was' not aware of that Project 99 =07 was going on
in the neighborhood. More importantly, I was not apart of and have no say as to the
authorization of this project. As a democratic society, if money is to be taken from
civilian pockets by the city of their residence, I think those civilians should have a say in =
the authorization of the projects in which the city implements. ,
The decision for me to pay for garden lots in my backyard is one in which I think the city
should reevaluate. I am sure that within the city of Maplewood's blue print; those. garden
lots can be developed into additional properties. But again, every pieceMof land has .its
place in the City's blue print. What the city of Maplewood does not realize is the
complication and reality of turning those garden lots into legal properties where it can be
brought and sold. In the picture of reality, those lots are not legal until an independent'
contractor comes and built a street into those lots. In other words, these garden
p rivate
lots are nothing but intangible properties that cannot be urchased, but existed only for
g p p y
the sole purpose of gardening. Thus, the situation of the assessment would -not apply to
these lots for they are not legal lots and have no tangible values attached to them. More
importantly, if a street were built into these lots to make the. lots legal and. purchasable,
...,these lots would .rely only on that independently private built street 'instead of Germain
Street, where the current assessment is being done. As a result, I cannot foresee the
garden lots as tangible properties where it should be taxed.
I am begging the City of Maplewood to' reevaluate its decision concerning the assessment
of my property. I think the current assessment that was forwarded to. me in April of 2000
is unwise and unethical for it not only attacks and places economically disadvantaged _
people like me in hardship, but it taxes nee for garden lots that have no tangible property
value. One consideration I like to make to the City of Maplewood is to realize the fact
that what is there is there, and what is there has the right be taxed.. But to proceed beyond
what is there and tax sornethin_ g that is not there is something that the City y of Maplewood
{' should not practice.
t
Q
ASSESSMENT 'HEARING APPEAL FORM
HAZELWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99-w07 .
Address of assessed parcel 'z.sSS '00
Property identification number: - _
2.
/ v - 't9r (1Z digit num ber) mco go ov
o d
� Do you wish to address the city council tonight? af o
_ Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
� no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
(check one):
� a. ❑ Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
b. ❑ Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
c. ❑ Cancellation of assessment J
t d. � Revision of assessment
1 Reason for the request:
i - F
AIL-
-AMW MEW-
1 10011 A.4
C4 5"&l AJ I
Print N
Address of Pr O#er Telephon
i
cit STate Zip
oo
oo !�
v -
;Fo4L
n
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FARM
HAZELWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99-07
Address of assessed parcel SylU / oC� Si
Property identification number:
am
.. _
(12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ❑ ❑
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the a#y council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. 1 request that the city council consider
(check
a. ❑ Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
b. 19 Disability hardship deferment (where retired b of a permanent and
total disability)
C. ❑ Cancellation of assessment �
d. ❑ Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
aYLd n OT 5 1( _ h e qe L Y
r rpj rx X
Print Name Signature Date
2Y Z2!a�.a�E�ad
Address of Property Owner Code Telephone
o0 c� P7%
City state Zip
F ol
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
HAZELWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99-
Address of assessed parcel A (o I S + � � S � c � � �-�t} rvC.
Property identification number.
(12 digit number)
Do ou wish to address the city council tonight? 0 E1
Y tY 9
Yes No
MAY - 8 Y000
P! °aSe ^om 1¢tg th!s f ^:'m if. you intend tn v+,al tai tho �!f` ^o'.::'1^.l� to defer, rx��,ilec� nr
p�
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
Will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
(check one):
a. ❑ Senior citizen deferment (over'65 years of age)
-- b. Disability hardship- deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
C. El Cancellation of assessment
d. ❑ Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
Print Name Signa Pro Y Date
Address of Property Owner Code Telephone
;-�Vajazzu_ Lot
City State Zip
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
HAZELWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT-99-
Address. of assessed parcel a✓�d � &0 �
Property identification number.
121 32 - � - 1�. - �2� � (12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight? E100
Yes
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record, i request that the city council consider
(check one):
a.
II
CIO
B Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
❑ Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
El Cancellation of assessment
d. ❑ Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
v A*
dir
*Dte
Print Name gi I
Address of Protgrty Owner
& 70
Code Telephone
agAdie_�gd &"U1000 - 0- 4 1 -
City State Zip
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
HAZELWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99.
Address of assessed parcel I t CIP cJ � S
Property identification number:
0
(12 number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight? 0.. ❑
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council defer, revise or
cancel your assessment This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's- city .council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
(check one):
a. Senior citizen deferment (over'65 years of age)
b. ❑ Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
C. D Cancellation of assessment
d. ❑ Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
�L�A.c b8t �tSG'i 1c°C�' fJ�\ \`rt �ctG� � �"U��W 5
►1 yI '
Print Name Vgnature Date
9
Address of Property Owner Code Telephone
t-9 7 1 s r./ /) - - ? -
City State Zip
0
U
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
HAZELWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99.07
Address of assessed parcel ,e9��¢ 7 9c 9
Property identification number:
(12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ❑
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
(check one):
a. ❑ Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
b. ❑ Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
c. ❑ Cancellation of assessment
d. Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
o2, farce /s -g�� �' �Jo NO7" Lvts// 4 70
6pGr T
N R� 16 � C
Print Name
M e woo,
Address of Property Owner
I.
a
IXI
170 - Y6 107 Code Telephone
ity W state Zip
I"i
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
HAZELWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 99-07
Address of assessed parcel �S r)
Property number
(12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ❑ ❑
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
(check one):
a. ❑ Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
b. ❑ Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
C. ❑ Cancellation of assessment
d. ff Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
Pt*g&j, IS7 1 ; 4kG6 ,
_ j -
P tN 1s, � Bo ,�l��� 8- cx � ame !gnat re Date
:Z
Address of Property Owner Code Telephone
1A/1 �d �
9±±v � 0
ity State Zip
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
HAZELWOOD S
PROJECT 99 -07
Address of assessed parcel 4V 1 Fig
Property identification number:
(12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ❑ ❑
Yes No
( CO )
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or
cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk
no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider
(check one):
a. El Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
-- - - - - -- -- b. El Disability hardship deferment (where retired by virtue of a permanent and
total disability)
C. ❑ Cancellation of assessment
d. ;q Revision of assessment
caz' O
Address of Property Owner Code Telephone
NI aPLEbJ d d M M 55to �
City State Zip
Reason for the request: �
44001
4000000*0
;O000wmmo'j:2 I
vooC
.4!p
co�
AGENDA ITEM' �
DEER MANAGEMENT
This item was put on the agenda so that action can be taken based on
discussion held during the Council/Manager Workshop.
5
MEMO
AGENDA ITEM - I
AGENDA REPORT
To: Ken Haider, Acting City M alter
F Steve Lukin, Fire Chief
st: Transfer of Fund for the New Fire Station from the Gladstone Fund
te: May 18, 2000
INTRODUCTION
As part of the consolidation contract with the three independent fire departments, each department was
allowed to keep its remaining - cash funds to be used for items jointly agreed upon by the department and
the city of Maplewood.
BACKGROUND
At this time, the former Gladstone Fire Department is asking to have its remaining cash assets of
approximately $60,000 transferred to the new station project. This money will be used toward
upgrades and essential items such as kitchen items, TV's, AV equipment, etc. As per the contract, the
items purchased will have to be mutually agreed upon by both parties.
RECOMMENDATION'
I request the council's approval to have the finance director transfer the above funds.
c: City Clerk
MEMO
AGENDA ITEM KZ
AGENDA REPORT
To: Ken Haider, Acting City M ager
From: Steve Lukin, Fire Chief
Subject: Budget Appropriation - East County Line Fund
Date: May 18, 2000
INTRODUCTION
As part of the consolidation contract with the three independent fire departments, each department was
allowed to keep its remaining cash funds to be used for items jointly agreed upon by the department and
the city of Maplewood.
BACKGROUND
At this time, the former East County Line Fire Department has put together a list of items that the
would like to see purchased with the remaining money in this fund. There was approximately $26,000
set aside for this special fund to be split between station one and station four.
Below is a list of what each station would like to purchase. Any remaining money from this fund will
be put into the truck replacement fund.
STATION ONE
New computer and a digital camera
$2.
STATION FOUR
Large screen TV
$2,000
New stereo system
$ 800
Built -in cabinets
$3,270
Personnel lockers
$1,000
Couch and recliners
$2,
High pressure washer
$1,400
White board
$ 100
Helmet flashlights
$2,000
Stereo system
$ 800
Gas grill
$ 650
Microwave oven
$ 150
Picnic tables
$ 550
Office equipment
$2,200
Indoor tables
$ 750
Firefighter mailboxes
$ 100
Meeting room dividers
$1,500
High pressure washer
$1,400
New office equipment
$1,750
Kitchen items
$ 500
TOTAL
$12,400
TOTAL
$12,620
RECOMMENDATION
After reviewing these requested items with the finance director, we feel that the items meet the intent of
the contract and that the money will be spent in the best interest of the Maplewood Fire Department. I
ask that the city council approve the above purchases.
c: City Clerk
AGENDA NO. 1<3
AGENDA REPORT Action by Council
Date
TO: Actiong City Manager Endorsed
Modified
�,_
FROM: Finance Director Rejected
RE: 2001 -2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (4 VOTES)
DATE: May 11, 2000
PROPOSAL
It is proposed that the 2001 -2005 Capital Improvement Plan be formally
adopted with a strong commitment to follow the construction and financing
schedule in the C.I.P. for public works projects.
BACKGROUND
The Capital Improvement Plan is a planning tool used to identify needed
capital projects and to coordinate the timing and financing of projects. Capital
projects for the Maplewood C.I.P. are defined as major equipment purchases
and construction projects costing in excess of $50,000. The 2001 -2005 C.I.P.
replaces the 2000 -2004 C.I.P. that was approved by the Council on June 14,
1999: Projects included in the first year of the C.I.P. will be included in the
Proposed 2001 Budget. It is important to note that the proposed tax levy for
the Capital Improvement Projects Fund will increase to $280,000 for the year
2001 which is a $231,500 increase over the tax levy for 2000.
This year again it is proposed that the C.I.P. be formally adopted by the
Council. As part of this adoption process, a strong commitment to follow the
construction and financing schedule on pages 1 -8 and 1 -9 in the C.I.P. is
needed. This will allow the City's engineering staff to be fully utilized and will
minimize the need for consultant engineers. Also, it will facilitate Finance
Department planning for the 2001 bond issue which will finance the public
works projects. Consequently, a public works project to be constructed in
2001 must be included in the C.I.P. to facilitate the engineering required for
the project. Projects not scheduled for 2001 in the C.I.P. will be delayed to
2002.
The C.I.P. document format this year is the same as last year's document.
The projects in the document are grouped by neighborhood and
neighborhood maps show the location of each project.
PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission will review the C.I.P. at its May 15th meeting. A
representative of the Planning Commission will be at the Council meeting to
report on the action the commission took.
ACTION REQUIRED
After the 20- minute video of the C.I.P. is shown, it is recommended that the
Council adopt the attached resolution. Since the C.I.P. is part of the
Comprehensive Plan, it requires four votes for adoption.
Attachment
PACIRADOPT.AGN
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the 2001 -2005 Capital Improvement Plan coordinates the
timing and financing of major equipment purchases and construction
projects, and
WHEREAS, the 2001 -2005 C.I.P. is a planning tool for City staff and
elected officials, and
WHEREAS, it is important to :follow .the .. construction and financing
schedule on pages 1 -8 and 1 -9 in the C.I.P. in order to fully utilize the
City's engineering staff and minimize the need for consultant engineers,
and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 2001 -2005 C.I.P. is
hereby adopted as a planning document, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the construction and financing schedule
on pages 1 -8 and 1 -9 in the C.I.P. will be followed to the greatest extent
possible.