HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 05-08 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, May 8, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -09
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting 00 -08 (April 24, 2000)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted
by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the
Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Liquor License - Ardeshir Boozary at the Future Bennigan's Restaurant
3. Temporary Food License Fee Waiver -Boy Scout Troop 187
4. Temporary Food License Fee Waiver -Cub Scout Pack 64
5. Amendment to Maplewood Nature Center Deed
6. Budget Adjustment for Park Development Fund
7. Bids for Used Vehicles - Police Department
8. Conditional Use Permit Review -Pep Boys (South of 2570 White Bear Avenue)
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. Hazelwood Street Improvements, Project 99 -07 - Assessment Hearing
2. 7:10 P.M. Club FTS Conditional Use Permit (1351 Frost Avenue)
3. 7:20 P.M. Forest Products Shop (Highway 61 and County Road C)
A. Setback Variances
B. Conditional Use Permit
C. Design Approval
4. 7:30 P.M. Fresh Paint Office/Warehouse (1055 Gervais Avenue)
A. Conditional Use Permit
B. Design Approval
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Hazelwood Street Improvements, Project 99 -07
2. Equipment Purchases
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Annual Neighborhood Stop Sign Requests
2. Preliminary Approval of Fire Safety Bond Issue
3. 2001 Charitable Gambling Requests
4. Stoplight at Joy, Hadley and Highway 120
S. Establish Year 2001 Pavement Management Policy Assessment Rates
6. Metricom Antenna Agreement
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for
this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make
arrangements. Assistant Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
DI
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, April 24, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -08
A. CALL TO ORDER:
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal
Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
C. ROLL CALL:
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Council /Manager Workshop (April 3, 2000) as
presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 00 -07 (April 10, 2000) as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the Agenda as amended.
M1. Media One
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS:
City Council announced that they have approved the appointment of Kathleen Juenemann to the Civil Service
Commission.
1
G. CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
1. Approval of Claims
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE:
114,232.72
197
274,835.20
1,076.15
166,884.02
1 88,929.59
943,165.44
PAYROLL:
37,246.19
316.
24,180.66
Checks #8264 thru #8273 dated 4 -3 thru 4 -6 -00
Checks #49134 thru #49245 dated 4 -11 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 4 -4 thru 4 -10 -00
Checks #8274 thru #8275 dated 4 -7 thru 4 -10 -00
Checks #49248 thru #49368 dated 4 -18 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 4 -11 thru 4 -17 -00
Total Accounts Payable
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 4 -7 -00
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 4 -14 -00
Payroll Deduction check #78100 thru 978107 dated 4 -14 -00
377,490.80 Total Payroll
GRAND TOTAL
2. Donation from 3M - Police Department
Approved the acceptance of a $6,000 donation from the 3M Corporation to be used toward the purchase of a
speed monitoring trailer for the Maplewood Police Department.
3. Change Order #2 for Maplewood Community Center Exercise Expansion
Approved the four change orders outlined below totaling $4,733:
2
1. Fury out the wall in the new fitness area and add overflow roof drains: $1,535
2. Add sidewalk to replace landscaped area: $1,652
3. Relocate electrical outlets and clock: $ 80
4. Raise existing roof drain above new ceiling and new fitness area: $1
Total $4.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
None
I. AWARD OF BIDS
None
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
K, NEW BUSINESS
1. Schedule Meeting to Review 1999 Annual Financial Report and Audit Reports
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report.
Council scheduled a special meeting of City Council to be held with Steve Laible of Peat Marwich to discuss
Maplewood's Annual Financial Report and Audit Report on May 8, 2000 at 6:00 p.m., preceding the regular
Council meeting.
2. B artlemy Acres Neighborhood Streets, City Project 99 -13
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the
report.
A. Approve Plans and Advertise for Bids
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following Resolution, approving_ plans and advertising for bids for
City Project 99-13, B artelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets.
RESOLUTION 00 -04 -047
APPROVING PLANS AND ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on February 28, 2000, plans and
specifications for the Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, Project 99 -13, have been prepared by (or under the
91
direction of) the city engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are
hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk.
2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction
Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening,
shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the council at
10 a.m.., on the 19th day of May, 2000, at the city hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and
filed with the clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid.
3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read
aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The council will
consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular city council meeting of May 22, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
B. Order Assessment Roll
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following Resolution, ordering_ preparation of assessment roll for
City Project 99 -13, Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets.
RESOLUTION 00 -04 -048
ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer will receive bids for the improvement of the B artelmy Acres
Neighborhood Streets, City Project 99-13.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such
improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard
to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office
for inspection.
FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council thereof.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
11
C. Order Assessment Hearing
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following Resolution, ordering assessment roll hearing for City
Project 99 -13, Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets.
RESOLUTION 00 -04 -049
ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING
WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at the direction of the council, prepared an assessment roll for
the improvement of the Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, City Project 99 -13, and the said assessment is on
file in the office of the city clerk.
NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 22nd day of May, 2000, at the city hall at 7:10 p. m. to pass upon
such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be
published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of
all property affected by said assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of the
improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the clerk and that written
or oral objections will be considered.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
3. Amending the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) Joint and Cooperative Agreement
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the
report.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to adopt a Resolution, approving the amended Joint and Cooperative
agreement for MLC.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
RESOLUTION 00 -04 -050
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 permits two or more government units, by agreement of
5
their governing bodies, to jointly and cooperatively exercise any power common to each of them, and
WHEREAS, the parties have entered into this Joint and Cooperative Agreement to develop programs on
matters of mutual concern and interest and identify, review and actively oppose proposals which may be in
conflict with the interest of the members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council and City Clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to execute the Joint and Cooperative Agreement as amended and attached hereto.
ADOPTED this 24th day of April, 2000.
4. Purchase Speed Monitoring Trailer
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the
report.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to authorize staff to purchase a Custom Signal Smart Model 1 speed
monitoring trailer and approved the appropriate budget transfers to fund the purchase.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
5. Emergency Purchase of Ambulance and Equipment
a. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the
report.
b. Attorney Kelly addressed legal issues regarding the emergency purchase.
Mayor Cardinal declared that an emergency exists to replace an ambulance which was destroyed by fire on
April 11, 2000, and action to replace it should commence immediately.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the purchase of one new ambulance from Road Rescue at the
purchase price paid in 1999 to be delivered in approximately ninety(90) dgys. This request is based on an
emergency basis.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
6. Reconsideration of Mogren Brother's Landscaping Conditional Use Permit (West of 2599 White Bear
Avenue)
Councilmember Koppen moved to schedule a public hearing fo r the purpose of reconsideration of the Mogren
Brother's Landscaping Conditional Use Permit.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - all
D
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Scott Cole of the Minnesota Waldorf School notified Council that the bond financing had closed and
progress is being made to proceed in the construction of the school. Mr. Cole invited the Mayor,
Council, and citizens to the ground breaking ceremony on May 5, 2000 at 1:00 p.m.
2. Kathleen Juenemann commented regarding the future church at the old Kmart site.
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Media One - Mayor Cardinal announced that in the near future Media One will be closed for upgrading
repairs and there will be broadcast interruptions.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None
O. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:30 P.M.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - all
Karen E. Guilfoile, City Clerk
7
AGENDA NO. G -1
TO: City Council
FROM: Assistant Finance Director
Chi"
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 1, 2000
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
42,133.45
130,961.49
107,727.46
2
224
208,315.98
Checks #8276 thru #8282 dated 4 -14 thru 4 -19 -00
Checks #49371 thru #49452 dated 4 -25 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 4 -18 thru 4 -24 -00
Checks #8283 thru #8288 dated 4 -21 thru 4 -28 -00
Checks #49455 thru #49547 dated 5 -2 -00
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 4 -25 thru 5 -1 -00
716,,017.67 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
464,534.20 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 4 -28 -00
22,686.05 Payroll Deduction check #78379 thru #78384 dated 4 -28 -00
487,220.25 Total Payroll
1,203,237.92 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions
on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if
necessary.
hu
Attachments
C:\OFFICE\WP-DOCS\AGENDA\APCLOOOI.MAY
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1
04/21/00 12:16 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
8276 04/14/00 722200 P.E.R.A.4-7-00 AFSCME PERFORMANCE PAY 1
4 -7 -00 AFSCME PERFORMANCE PAY 1 3
8277 04/14/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 867.00 867.00
8278 04/17/00 720600 POSTMASTER NNO - BULK MAILING TO BUSINESS 134.85 134.85
8279 04/17/00 561050 MINNESOTA UC FUND IST QTR 2000 UNEMPLOYMENT 3 3
8280 04/17/00 341706 HERITAGE BANK US SAVINGS BONDS 3 -31 & 4 -14 650.00 650.00
8281 04/19/00 300901 GFOA CERT ACH FOR EXCEL REVIEW PROC 415.00 415.00
8282 04/19/00 722200 P.E.R.A.4 -14 -00 P/R 14,783.28
4 -14 -00 P/R 18,580.86 33,364.14
49371 04/25/00 TINA THOMASSER REFUND - BANQUET ROOM RENTAL 250.00 250.00
49372 04/25/00 MARGARET FRANCIS REFUND - SOFTBALL SR 40.00 40.00
49373 04/25/00 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC REFUND - SOFTBALL 50.00 50.00
49374 04/25/00 THERESA ZAPPA REFUND - BASKETBALL CLINIC 79.00 79.00
49375 04/25/00 CLARENCE SPRINGBORN REFUND - TO PATIENT 183.18 183.18
49376 04/25/00 STEPHEN KUHN REFUND 00003120 422.30 422.30
49377 04/25/00 010445 ARCOA INDUSTRIES MAINTENANCE MATER - rALS _ - - - --341 - -
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 20.84-320.47
49378 04/25/00 010450 ASP CERTIFICATES 18.77
CERTIFICATES 65-18.12
49379 04/25/00 010575 ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 123.74
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 478.06 601.80
49380 04/25/00 020405 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL 02 CYL RENTAL 385.54
02 CYL RENTAL 54.68 440.22
49381 04/25/00 021200 AMERICAN FASTENER OF MN, INC.MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 165.25 165.25
49382 04/25/00 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MATS 37.88 37.88
49383 04/25/00 021700 AMOCO OIL COMPANY FUEL 19.45 19.45
49384 04/25/00 030725 ANKENY KELL ARCHITECTS MAPLEWOOD CC EXPANSION 1,801.11 1,801.11
49385 04/25/00 031905 AQUA LOGIC, INC.CHEMICALS 1,066.92 1
49386 04/25/00 041500 ASPEN MILLS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 478.95 478.95
1
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2
04/21/00 12:16 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
49387 04/25/00 070445 BELDE, STAN K-9 MAINTENANCE 35.00
K9 MAINTENANCE 35.00 70.00
49388 04/25/00 070450 BELLS INTERNATIONAL INC EMS WEEK SUPPLIES 231.98 231.98
49389 04/25/00 110320 CAPITOL CITY REG FIRE FTRS ASS DUES FOR 2000 35.00 35.00
49390 04/25/00 120525 CENTURY COLLEGE TRAINING SLOTS - WINTER 2000 295.00
EMT REFRESHER 185.00 480.00
49391 04/25/00 120650 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES FOAMING AEROSOL -M /M WRAP 547.93 547.93
49392 04/25/00 151790 CONCEPT II INC 2 REBUILT DISPLAYS 297.14
2 REBUILT DISPLAYS 18.14-279.00
49393 04/25/00 151855 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE ADV FOR BID OF NEW PUMPER 69.75 69.75
49394 04/25/00 170230 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER WATER SERVICE 35.80 35.80
49395 04/25/00 180800 DALCO CREDIT - SUPPLIES 56.65 -
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 79.94
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 560.95
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 135.45
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 619.31 1
49396 04/25/00 230900 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO.I 1X TONER 90OGM 25.43
I 1X TONER 90OGM 25.43
I 1X TONER 90OGM 84
I 1X TONER 90OGM 32.85
I 1X TONER 90OGM 68.44
I 1X TONER 90OGM 60.83
I 1X TONER 90OGM 14.50
I 1X TONER 90OGM 27.98
11X TONER 90OGM 68.03
11X TONER 90OGM 56.34
IX TONER 900 GM 25.43
IX TONER 900 GM 25.43
IX TONER 900 GM 84
IX TONER 900 GM 32.85
IX TONER 900 GM 68.44
IX TONER 900 GM 60.83
IX TONER 900 GM 14.50
IX TONER 900 GM 27.98
IX TONER 900 GM 68.03
IX TONER 900 GM 56.34
USAGE BILL - MARCH 2000 49.79
USAGE BILL - MARCH 2000 49.79
USAGE BILL - MARCH 2000 1.64
USAGE BILL - MARCH 2000 64.32
USAGE BILL - MARCH 2000 134.00
USAGE BILL - MARCH 2000 119.10
z
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3
04/21/00 12 :16 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
USAGE BILL - MARCH 2000 28.40
USAGE BILL - MARCH 2000 54.78
USAGE BILL - MARCH 2000 133.18
USAGE BILL - MARCH 2000 110.30 1
49397 04/25/00 231525 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.PROJ MGMT INFORUM GOLD UPDATE 343.75 343.75
49398 04/25/00 240150 ELSMORE AQUATIC MDSE. FOR RESALE 129.89
MDSE. FOR RESALE 29.46 159.35
j 49399 04/25/00 260250 FACILITY SYSTEMS,INC.DUPLEX REP 96.49
2 LATERAL FILE CABINETS 1,267.68 1,364.17
49400 04/25/00 260656 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES, IN R &B FABRICATIONS -SCBA BAGS 1,274.95 1,274.95
49401 04/25/00 280690 FRANK, PETE CONTRACT EMP /BASKETBALL OFF 1,000.00 1
49402 04/25/00 280840 FRASER, JOHN CANDY FOR DARE KIDS 52.44 52.44
49403 04/25/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 58.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 46.37
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 46.65
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 12.27
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 47.49
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 56.74
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 77.23
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 39.78
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 7.30
MATS 27.00
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 20.28
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 64.51
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19
FEES FOR SERVICE 49.60
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 15.49
MATS 42.33
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 78.19
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 77.23
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 39.78
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 7.30
MATS 27.00
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 20.28
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 24.51 984.91
49404 04/25/00 310710 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.SERVICE - MARCH 2000 3.50 3.50
49405 04/25/00 340106 HEINZ, STEVE LUNCH FOR DARE STUDENTS 43.24 43.24
49406 04/25/00 350470 HIEBERT, STEVEN K-9 HANDLER 35.00 35.00
3
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4
04/21/00 12:16 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
49407 04/25/00 400788 JAMES STEELE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR PAYMENT #3 -MCC ADD 87,427.00
CONTRACTOR PAYMENT #3 -MCC ADD 4 83,056.00
49408 04/25/00 410370 KATH COMPANIES UNLEADED MID - GRADE GASOLINE 6 6,863.50
49409 04/25/00 420150 KINKO'S CUSTOMER ADM SERVICES NNO - MAILERS 117.02
PRINTING /LAMINATING 26.63 143.65
49410 04/25/00 430350 KNOX LUMBER CO SMALL TOOLS 179.23 179.23
49411 04/25/00 430660 KRACHE, JIM FUR TRADER PRESENTATION 200.00 200.00
49412 04/25/00 430980 KREINES & KREINES, INC.SUBSR TO PLAN WIRELESS 30.00 30.00
49413 04/25/00 450140 L.T.G. POWER EQUIPMENT ECHO BLOWER 158.69
AIR FILTERS 78.04 236.73
49414 04/25/00 450185 LABOR ALL FEES FOR SERVICE 296.01 296.01
49415 04/25/00 470665 LIGHTING PLASTICS OF MN INC ACRYLIC WRAP LENS 107.65 107.65
49416 04/25/00 500300 M.A. ASSOCIATES SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 48.14 48.14
49417 04/25/00 500301 MAACO AUTO PAINTING PAINT PARK PATROL VEHICLE 553.50 553.50
49418 04/25/00 500510 M.L.E.E.A.EXPLORER CONF 800.00
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 25.00 825.00
49419 04/25/00 510057 MANSHIP R -O -W ESCROW 616 MCCLELLAND N 500.00 500.00
49420 04/25/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY 4/13/00 BIRTHDAY CAKES 131.75 131.75
49421 04/25/00 530500 MENARDS SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 125.47
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 7.45
BAND SAW BLADE 23.87 156.79
49422 04/25/00 540175 MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO.MDSE. FOR RESALE 364.50
MDSE. FOR RESALE 54.00-310.50
49423 04/25/00 540496 MIKISKA, WILLIAM PROGRAM SUPPLIES 64.09 64.09
49424 04/25/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO FILM DEV 2.89
FILM DEV 29.01 31.90
49425 04/25/00 542455 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 73.26 73.26
49426 04/25/00 570065 MODERN FENCE & CONST., INC.HINGES 8.37 8.37
49427 04/25/00 640815 NEWPROS DATA, INC.PUBLISHING 42.95 42.95
49428 04/25/00 660800 NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF UTILITIES 178.05
n
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5
04/21/00 12:16 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
UTILITIES 223.87
MONTHLY UTILITIES - 4/15/00 1
MONTHLY UTILITIES - 4/15/00 218.29 2
49429 04/25/00 661600 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO.MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 22.33
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 14.90 37.23
49430 04/25/00 690340 OLSON, ARNOLD G PLAN REVIEW 1 1
49431 04/25/00 720760 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 44.28 44.28
49432 04/25/00 741201 RAINBOW FOODS MDSE. FOR RESALE 28.05
MDSE. FOR RESALE 9.66
MDSE. FOR RESALE 8.93
TRAVEL & TRAINING 22.95
CANDY - DARE 19.43
PROGRAM SUPPLIES 32.35 121.37
49433 04/25/00 750500 REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL & LUBE CAR WASHES 62.55
CAR WASHES 6.54
CAR WASHES 34.70
CAR WASHES 13.08 116.87
49434 04/25/00 761300 ROADRUNNER COURIER AFR TO KPMG 27.00 27.00
49435 04/25/00 762724 RYAN, MICHAEL REFRESHMENTS /CALL 00- 006146 35.00 35.00
49436 04/25/00 790495 SCI -TECH SUPPLY MISCROSCOPE ADAPTER 168.01 168.01
49437 04/25/00 800200 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION REG W ROSSBACH /REGULATIONS 15.00 15.00
49438 04/25/00 800390 SERVICE & CONTRACTING SUBSCRIPTION - 1 YEAR 29.95 29.95
49439 04/25/00 820300 PROFESSIONAL MASSAGE CENTER MARCH - MASSAGES 2 2
49440 04/25/00 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF RADIO SRV /MAINT FEB 2000 936.00
RADIO SRV /MAINT FEB 2000 666.99
RADIO SRV /MAINT FEB 2000 235.20
MEDIC SUPPLIES 1 3
49441 04/25/00 842300 STAR SUPPLY SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 21.97 21.97
49442 04/25/00 843575 STREICHER'S SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 61.15
SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 31.90 93.05
49443 04/25/00 851600 SZCZEPANSKI, TOM TRAINING - LUNCHES 36.89 36.89
49444 04/25/00 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA A/R SUPPLIES - OFFICE 205.69
PROGRAM SUPPLIES 32.10
PROGRAM SUPPLIES 58.47 296.26
5
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/21/00 12:16 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
49445 04/25/00 861666 THE METAL DOCTOR CONV TRLR TO HYDRAULIC
TRAILER SAFETY MODIFICATION
49446 04/25/00 881700 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. REPAIR /REPLACE GARAGE DOOR
49447 04/25/00 882830 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT RECOVE TOW SOD
TOW AMB
49448 04/25/00 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
49449 04/25/00 900180 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE TO REPLENISH POSTAGE METER
49450 04/25/00 911350 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
SMALL TOOLS
ELECTRIC SUPPLY
REPAIR & MAINT /BUILDINGS
49451 04/25/00 931860 WASTE MANAGEMENT APRIL 2000 SERVICE
49452 04/25/00 941685 WILSON, JASON MILEAGE
TOTAL CHECKS
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,779.62
1,779.62
1,008.00
37.28
101.18
35.00
600.00
27.26
81.00
111.60
81.00
83.00
62.00
233.95
199.42
59.15
62.00
62.00
65.90
98.00
5.86
3,000.00
45.11
29.81
111.88
237.51
162.65
113.40
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,559.24
1,008.00
138.46
1,867.14
3,000.00
424.31
162.65
113.40
173, 094.94
oj
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date : Date Payee Descri ation Amount
04/17/00 04/18/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 721.00
04/17/00 04/18/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 18,598.44
04/17/00 04/18/00 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 14,138.82
04/14/00 04/18/00 CBSA Dental fees 41157.56
04/18/00 04/19/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 607.00
04/18/00 04/19/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 16,511.68
04/14/00 04/19/00 Elan Financial Services Purchasin g card items 1
04/11/00 04/19/00 MN Dept of Revenue Sales Tax 6
04/19/00 04/20/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 730.25
04/19/00 04/20/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 12,943.50
04/20/00 04/21/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 665.00
04/20/00 04/21/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149pYg 15 874.40
04/19/00 04/21/00 MN Dept of Revenue Fuel Tax 325.00
04/21/00 04/24/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 657.50
04/21/00 04/24/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registraristrar #149 13,736.46
TOTAL 107727.46
VA
t
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1
04/28/00 09:00 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
8283 04/21/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR REG 481.00 481.00
8284 04/25/00 500510 M.L.E.E.A.ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 25.00 25.00
8285 04/25/00 500510 M.L.E.E.A.EXPLORER CONFERENCE 800.00 800.00
8286 04/27/00 900390 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA SOILS TESTING 38.00 38.00
8287 04/27/00 630018 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS PERA LIFE INS -P /R DED APRIL 201.00
MCGUIRE, MIKE 12.00 213.00
8288 04/28/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 872.00 872.00
TOTAL CHECKS 21429.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/28/00 10:20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
49455 05/02/00 JODIE SPIRER REFUND -SWIM
49456 05/02/00 WEST GROUP REFUND - SOFTBALL C TURNER
49457 05/02/00 HEATHER HOM REFUND - EASTER EGG HUNT
49458 05/02/00 NANCY LEREW REFUND - SOFTBALL A FENNER
49459 05/02/00 VIOLET STOLPE REFUND - 99018312
49460 05/02/00 LEROY CASURA REFUND - 00002768
49461 05/02/00 010467 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES CELL PHONES
49462 05/02/00 020870 ALLIED MEDICAL ACCTS CONTROL CONTRACT PAYMENT
49463 05/02/00 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MATS
49464 05/02/00 030310 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.REPAIR & MAINT /RADIO
49465 05/02/00 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.FEES FOR SERVICE
49466 05/02/00 071200 BEST BUY CO.HANDSPRING VISOR DELUXE
HANDSPRING VISOR DELUXE
49467 05/02/00 110152 CSI SOFTWARE ANNUAL MAINT 5/1/00- 4/30/01
49468 05/02/00 110280 CAMAS INC.TONS - RIPRAD
49469 05/02/00 152400 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC.MYLAR 22X34
IJBC
49470 05/02/00 161130 CRAMER BUILDING SERVICES BOILER REPAIR
49471 05/02/00 170200 CUB FOODS - MAPLEWOOD EAST PROGRAM SUPPLIES
49472 05/02/00 190500 DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1ST QTR 2000
1ST QTR 2000
49473 05/02/00 210950 DUNN, ALICE UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
49474 05/02/00 220100 THE DWELLING IN THE WOODS DEPOSIT FEE /VOLUNTEER FLD TRIP
49475 05/02/00 230220 EDI CO.2 KTM8X32L - 70T
HP LASERJET 1100
49476 05/02/00 230900 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO.USAGE BILLING FOR MAY 1999
USAGE BILLING FOR MAY 1999
USAGE BILLING FOR MAY 1999
USAGE BILLING FOR MAY 1999
USAGE BILLING FOR MAY 1999
ITEM
AMOUNT
35.00
140.00
6.00
40.00
177.98
301.19
363.02
639.46
36.69
678.75
903.22
266.24
266.24
3,204.00
453.57
180.94
75.82
319.00
33.11
1,920.00
1,350.00
42.00
650.00
234.66
413.34
32.39
32.39
1.07
41.84
87.17
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
35.00
140.00
6.00
40.00
177.98
301.19
363.02
639.46
36.69
678.75
903.22
532.48
3,204.00
453.57
256.76
319.00
33.11
3,270.00
42.00
650.00
648.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLENOOD PAGE 2
04/28/00 10:20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
USAGE BILLING FOR MAY 1999 77.48
USAGE BILLING FOR MAY 1999 18.47
USAGE BILLING FOR MAY 1999 35.64
USAGE BILLING FOR MAY 1999 86.64
USAGE BILLING FOR MAY 1999 71.75
USAGE BILL NOV 99 71.59
USAGE BILL NOV 99 71.59
USAGE BILL NOV 99 2.36
USAGE BILL NOV 99 92.49
USAGE BILL NOV 99 192.69
USAGE BILL NOV 99 171.26
USAGE BILL NOV 99 40.83
USAGE BILL NOV 99 78.77
USAGE BILL NOV 99 191.51
USAGE BILL NOV 99 158.61
49477 05/02/00 240360 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC.OPERATION CHECKS ON 11 SIRENS 1,265.00
49478 05/02/00 250500 EXECUTONE SYSTEMS OF ST PAUL ROLLING SEQUENCE REPAIR 169.75
2 ANALOG EXTENSIONS 306.01
49479 05/02/00 260290 FARMER BROS. CO.COFFEE 205.20
49480 05/02/00 280040 FOR PET'S SAKE INC AQUARIUM MAINT 60.00
49481 05/02/00 280110 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC.SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 371.03
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 21.42-
49482 05/02/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 11.20
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 32.90
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 44.38
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 77.23
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 44.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 46.65
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 12.27
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 56.74
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 89.22
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 39.78
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 7.30
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 20.28
MATS 27.00
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 24.51
49483 05/02/00 300550 GE CAPITAL APRIL - KODAK COPIER LEASE 35.29
APRIL - KODAK COPIER LEASE 35.29
APRIL - KODAK COPIER LEASE 1.26
APRIL - KODAK COPIER LEASE 45.59
APRIL - KODAK COPIER LEASE 94.99
APRIL - KODAK COPIER LEASE 84.23
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,556.54
1,265.00
475.76
205.20
60.00
349.61
544.24
10
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3
04/28/00 10:20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
APRIL - KODAK COPIER LEASE 20.13
APRIL - KODAK COPIER LEASE 38.83
APRIL - KODAK COPIER LEASE 94.42
APRIL - KODAK COPIER LEASE 78.29 528.32
49484 05/02/00 300950 G T PARTS COMPANY DUPONT/LACQUER SPRAY 122.19 122.19
49485 05/02/00 320265 GRAFIX SHOPPE PARK PATROL VEH MARKINGS 154.61
160 DECALS FOR NEW SEBA 456.00 610.61
49486 05/02/00 340110 HEJNY RENTALS, INC SAW, CONCRETE WALK BEHIND 32.11 32.11
49487 05/02/00 350700 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT /SUPPLIES 27.90
PAINT /SUPPLIES 70880 98.70
49488 05/02/00 350895 HOLIDAY FLEET CAR WASHES 9.54 9.54
49489 05/02/00 351610 HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY FEAS STUDY LIFT STAT9 -FEB25 13, 020.79
DESIGN MCES METER STAT - MAR31 272.50
FEASIBLE STUDY REP LIFT9 -MAR31 13,379.45 26
49490 05/.02/00 380.172 ICBC - AUTO CRIME STRATEGIES AUTO THEFT VIDEO 37.28
AUTO THEFT VIDEO 2.28-35.00
49491 05/02/00 401650 JOHNSTON FARGO CULVERT INC MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 771.44 771.44
49492 05/02/00 410160 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL.SRVS- ANNUAL AUDIT 3 3,000.00
49493 05/02/00 430328 KNOWLANS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 30.71 30.71
49494 05/02/00 430970 KRECH'S BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.EPSON PFX5000 85.00 85.00
49495 05/02/00 450140 L.T.G. POWER EQUIPMENT LABOR POWER PRUNER 29.00 29.00
49496 05/02/00 459510 LAUSENG STONE INC.STONE 106.50 106.50
49497 05/02/00 460000 LE, SHERRIE L TELEPHONE 24.04 24.04
49498 05/02/00 460452 LEAGUE OF MINN. CITIES LMC - CITIES BULLETIN 40.00 40.00
49499 05/02/00 480577 LORDON INC SIGNS & SIGNALS 1,506.52
SIGNS & SIGNALS 88.73-1
49500 05/02/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY MDSE. FOR RESALE 710.36
4 -21 -00 BIRTHDAY CAKES 55.00 765.36
49501 05/02/00 511600 MASYS CORP MAY 2000 HARDWARE /SOFTWARE M 704.25 704.25
49502 05/02/00 520500 MCGUIRE, MICHAEL VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 450.00 450.00
49503 05/02/00 530500 MENARDS PAINT /SUPPLIES 15.22 15.22
11
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4
04/28/00 10 :20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
49504 05/02/00 530501 MENARDS 4 FLSCENT 40W 13.74 13.74
49505 05/02/00 530755 METROCALL DIGITAL PAGER 10.46
PAGERS 22.57 33.03
49506 05/02/00 531400 METRO SALES INC.2 GLASS CLEANER COPIER 12.47 12.47
49507 05/02/00 531650 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER - MAY 2000 150,220.00 150,220.00
49508 05/02/00 540175 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.MDSE. FOR RESALE 360.30 360.30
49509 05/02/00 541960 MINNESOTA D.A.R.E., INC.DARE GRADUATION CAKE 9.00 9.00
49510 05/02/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO DEVELOP FILM 5.52 5.52
49511 05/02/00 561300 MIXED BLOOD THEATER CO PERF - ACCORDING TO COYOTE 400.00 400.00
49512 05/02/00 610400 MUNICILITE CO.SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 280.84
BRAID HYDRAULIC HOSE 400.44 681.28
49513 05/02/00 620600 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 404.33 404.33
49514 05/02/00 630005 N.A.D.A. °GUIDES SUBSCRIPTION TO NADA 60.00 60.00
49515 05/02/00 690340 OLSON, ARNOLD G PROF PLAN REVIEW /CODE CONS 580.00 580.00
49516 05/02/00 700900 PARK SUPPLY, INC.SHOWER HAND 79.24 79.24
49517 05/02/00 720580 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS EMS WEEK SUPPLIES 459.37
EMS WEEK SUPPLIES 25.93-433.44
49518 05/02/00 720750 PRAIRIE MOON NURSERY WILD FLOWERS /GRASS 60.17 60.17
49519 05/02/00 721185 PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC LIC FEE /APRIL ACCESS FEE 95.00
LIC FEE /APRIL ACCESS FEE 95.00 190.00
49520 05/02/00 722300 PUMP AND METER SERVICE, INC.LABOR /SHOP SUPPLIES 85.16 85.16
49521 05/02/00 750550 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS MDSE. FOR RESALE 356.82 356.82
49522 05/02/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.SUPPLIES - OFFICE 140.95
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 234.79
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 22.48
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 145.95
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 99.17
CREDIT MEMO - RETURNED CARAFE 29.60-613.74
49523 05/02/00 790630 SCREEN TECH SKYWARN DECALS 290.00 290.00
49524 05/02/00 800180 SEMPLE BUILDING MOVERS, INC.DRAW #3- HOUSE,BARN,GRANARY 10 10
12
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5
04/28/00 10 :20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
49525 05/02/00 810620 SHORTREED, MICHAEL MEDIC SCHOOL - LUNCH 29.51 29.51
49526 05/02/00 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF MARCH 2000 - RADIO SERVICE 196.25
MARCH 2000 - RADIO SERVICE 275.86
MARCH 2000 - RADIO SERVICE 69.16
MEDIC SUPPLIES 264.24 805.51
49527 05/02/00 843570 STREAMLINE DESIGN 81 "50/50 TEE SHIRTS 364.50 364.50
49528 851575 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.HP 2500.CM INK CARTRIDGES 255.26 255.26
49529 05/02/00 860080 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC BITUMINOUS MATERIALS 410.99 410.99
49530 05/02/00 860410 TSE, INC.JANITORIAL SERVICES 2/24-3/22/669.00 669.00
49531 05/02/00 860720 TAYLOR SALES, INC.REPAIR YOGURT MACHINE 150.89 150.89
49532 05/02/00 861690 THOMALLA, DAVID UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 420.00 420.00
49533 05/02/00 871175 TOM'S MOBIL SERVICE SERVICE U3 41.34 41.34
49534 05/02/00 880675 TROPHIES UNLIMITED BASKETBALL MEDALS 246.42
VOLLEYBALL TROPHIES 235.40 481.82
49535 05/02/00 880800 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG.MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 30.46 30.46
49536 05/02/00 881500 TWIN_CITY FILTER SERVICE SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 206.69 206.69
49537 05/02/00 881750 TWIN CITY HARDWARE MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 132.60 132.60
49538 05/02/00 882830 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVE TOW SOD 941 37.45
TOW FORFEITURE VEH 127.80 165.25
49539 05/02/00 890875 U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP Q FLARED END SECT 772.12 772.12
49540 05/02/00 890900 U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS PAYMENT FOR COIN -OP TELEPHONES 59.26
PAYMENT FOR COIN -OP TELEPHONES 55.67
PAYMENT FOR COIN -OP TELEPHONES 59.26
PAYMENT FOR COIN-OP TELEPHONES 70.72
PAYMENT FOR COIN-OP TELEPHONES 59.30
PAYMENT FOR COIN -OP TELEPHONES 59.30
PAYMENT FOR COIN-OP TELEPHONES 63.13
PAYMENT FOR COIN -OP TELEPHONES 67.28 493.92
49541 05/02/00 890910 US WEST DEX 4/1 - 4/30/00 103.40 103.40
49542 05/02/00 900226 UNITED RENTALS MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 75.98 75.98
49543 05/02/00 910535 VECTOR INTERNET SERVICES WEB SITE HOSTING 24.00 24.00
49544 05/02/00 934180 WATTERS, DANIEL DEPOSIT ON EQUIPMENT 200.00
13
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6
04/28/00 10:20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
MDSE. FOR RESALE 178.23 378.23
49545 05/02/00 941675 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES, INC.PAPER 244.10 244.10
49546 05/02/00 942515 WINGER, DON MN CHF OF POLICE CONFERENCE 303.00 303.00
49547 05/02/00 980195 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC.ELGIN PRO STRIP 268.38 268.38
TOTAL CHECKS 224,450.29
iL
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee
04/24/00 04/25/00
04/24/00 04/25/00
04/21/00 04/25/00
04/25/00 04/26/00
04/25/00 04/26/00
04/21/00 04/26/00
04/26/00 04/27/00
04/26/00 04/27/00
04/27/00 04/28/00
04/27/00 04/28/00
04/28/00 05/01/00
04/28/00 05/01/00
04/28/00 05/01/00
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
CBSA
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
Elan Financial Servic
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
U.S. Treasurer
TOTAL
Description
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
Dental fees
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
es Purchasing card items
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
Federal Payroll Tax
Amount
973.00
19,245.37
1,353.80
787.75
20,324.70
2
681.00
15, 829.88
443.25
20,613.79
424.00
15, 825.31
109,444.59
208,315.98
15
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR'THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 ALLENSPACH, SHERRY 339927
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 ALDRIDGE , MARK 2 5 41.6 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 BOHL, JOHN C 2 4 3 7.2 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 FLOR TIMOTHY 2 3 7 7.4 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 FRASER JOHN 2 292_.55
DIRECT DEP O SIT
04/28/00 TAUBMAN,DOUGLAS J 2121.80
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 PALMA,STEVEN 2528.67
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 JOHNSON,KEVIN 2029.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 ERICKSON,VIRGINIA A 2059.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/2-8/00 HELLE , KERRY 2 3 4 0.13
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 ANDREWS , SCOTT A 2 2 2 5.19
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 HASSENSTAB, DENISE R 124.80
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 HIEBERT, STEVEN 3024987
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 DUNN,ALICE 2048.29
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 CORNER, AMY L 184900
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 MOREHEAD,JESSICA R 92940
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 CHRISTENSEN,CHARLES M 1774.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 BELDE,STANLEY 2221.47
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 RENSLOW , RITA 15 5.8 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 BAKKE , LONN A 18 9 4.4 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 BOWMAN ,RICK A 2 0 2 6.4 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 KOPPEN , MARVIN 3 3 9.2 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 PIKE,GARY K 2092.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 HEINZ ,STEPHEN J 2305.88
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 HEMQUIST,MICHAEL R 2204.00
16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 HERBERT, MICHAEL J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 STOCKTON , DERRELL T
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 ROSSMAN, DAVID A
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 HALWEG KEVIN R
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 JUNG,STEPHANIE J
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 MARUSKA,ERICA
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 OLSON,JULIE S
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 BREHEIM,ROGER W
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 LARSON ,DANIEL J
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 THI ENES , PAUL
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 ANZALDI , MANDY
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 CALLAHAN , COLLEEN J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 CARLSON, THERESE
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 LE , SHERYL
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 FAUST DANIEL F
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 BAUMAN,GAYLE L
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 KELSEY,CONNIE L
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 GUILFOILE, KAREN E
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 POWELL, PHILIP
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 WINGER, DONALD S
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 BAN I CK , JOHN J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 K;ARI S FLINT D
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 KVAM,DAVID
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 RABBETT,KEVIN
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 STEFFEN, SCOTT L
AMOUNT
2119.58
2026.43
2112.15
2456.69
1530.28
231.10
1337.63
1645.56
1690.63
2552.11
37.65
1745.23
1754.30
3141.92
3403.12
2096.26
654.24
2004.79
1698.26
3322.37
2614o55
2466.81
2608.58
2278.57
2456.69
17
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT.
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 THOMALLA, DAVID J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 BERGERON, JOSEPH A
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 GERVAI S —JR, CLARENCE N
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 LUKIN , STEVEN J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 HAIDER,KENNETH G
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 PRIEFER,WILLIAM
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 KANE,MICHAEL R
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 LUNDSTEN,LANCE
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M
DIRECT DEPOSIT°
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 AND ERSON,BRUCE
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 MARUSKA , MARK A
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 HUTCHINSON , ANN E
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 COLEMAN , MELINDA
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 GRAF ,MICHAEL
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 ROBBINS AUDRA L
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 ATKINS,KATHERINE
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 CROSSON,LINDA
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 EASTMAN , THOMAS E
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 STAPLES, PAULINE
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 SCHLINGMAN , PAUL
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 HURLEY, STEPHEN
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 S Z C Z EPANSKI , THOMAS J
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 WENZEL,JAY B
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 DOBLAR , RI CHARD N
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 COLLINS , KENNETH V
AMOUNT
2 614.55
2621.70
1980.89
2579.94
4153.12
1875.23
2135.23
2374.77
2465.83
3059.51
2135.23
1780.03
2948.13
1211o23
1229.71
1149.63
1628.03
2130.86
2400.31
1826°43
2247.05
2263.53
1337.63
1421.90
339.27
CITY OF_MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS.REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 CAMPBELL, CRAIG D 12 4 4.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT J 2 4 3.9 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 ERI CKSON , KYLE F 635995
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 WEAVER,KRISTINE A 846.59
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 HAWKINS,LISA A 100975
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 KOEHNEN,AMY 54.75,
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 MCGUIRE ,MICHAEL A 418 0.3 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 TRONNES,JOHN E 1244983
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 ERI CSON ,MICHAEL A 3868954
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 OSIER, ANDREA J 15 0 8.0 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 URBANSKI , HOLLY S 12 9 8.4 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 ANDERSON , CAROLE J 8 6 3.5 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 JACKSON, MARY L 1485963
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 TETZLAFF I JUDY A 13 4 0.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 CASAREZ,GINA 1471.65
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 ICKES,SHERI 1310.24
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 CARLE,JEANETTE E 1427.01
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 JAGOE , CAROL 1420,66
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 OLSON , SANDRA 1018,40
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 CORCORAN, THERESA M 13 4 3.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 MARTINSON , CAROL F.1751e18
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 EVERSON PAUL 1725,41
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 PARSONS,KURT G 1386.97
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 SPANGLER,EDNA E 675.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 ZWI EG , SUSAN C .14 8 0.0 3
19
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 DeBILZAN, THOMAS C
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 EDGE , DOUGLAS
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 LUT Z, DAVID P
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 MEYER GERALD W
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 NAGEL,BRYAN
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 OSWALD,ERICK D
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 THOMAS- JR,STEVEN
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 DUCHARME ,JOHNDIRECTDEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 PECK, DENNIS L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 PRI EBE , WILLIAM
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 DOHERTY , KATHLEEN M
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 GREW - HAYMAN , JANET M
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 HORSNELL, JUDITH A
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 NELSON JEAN
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 GAYNOR,VIRGINIA A
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 FRY,PATRICIA
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 THOMPSON, DEBRA J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 EKSTRAND , THOMAS G
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 ROBERTS , KENNETH -
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 CARVER NICHOLAS N
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 KELLY,LISA
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 NORDQUIST,RICHARD
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 OTI S, MARY ELLEN M
VX moftay
1199.23
1540.03
1818.54
1619.23
1586.63
1832.04
1532.03
1776.03
1929.34
2473.53
1508.03
1561.63
1192.08
846.02
906.11
1373.26
1446.43
9 7 2 s 7 4
480.65
1890.43
1949.71
2128.55
1149.42
1601.29
644.15
J
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD.
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 CHRISTENSEN, JODIE D 48 6.77
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 COLEMAN , PHILIP 3 61.8 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 FARR, DIANE M 3 3 3.07
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 HORWATH,RONALD J 496.41
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 JOHNSON,MEGAN M 268.36
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 LARSON,DEBRA 309.06
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 MOORE,VANESSA J 793.36
DIRECT DEPOSIT
04/28/00 SAVAGEAU,STEPHEN D 1354943
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 SEEGER, GERALD F 3 7 4.01
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 STEINHORST , JEFFREY 5 2 3.0 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 SWANSON , LYLE 15 3 6.5 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT 04/28/00 COSTELLO, SHARON L 200e65
78108 04/28/00 MELANDER,JON A 32437.94
78111 04/28/00 CARDINAL,ROBERT J.385.50
78112 04/28/00 WASILUK,JULIE A 339.27
78113 04/28/00 CUDE,LARRY J 391.71
78114 04/28/00 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 755971
78115 04/28/00 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 1630.70
78116 04/28/00 JOHNSON,BONNIE 852946
78117 04/28/00 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1459.69
78118 04/28/00 PALANK,MARY KAY 1624906
78119 04/28100 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1725.76
78120 04/28/00 RYAN,MICHAEL 2935909
78121 04/28/00 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1900.88
78122 04/28/00 BARTZ,PAUL 2452.74
21
J
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78123 04/28/00 BUSACK,DANIEL P 13.37.63
78124 04/28/00 COLEMAN,LEROY L 156.00
78125 04/28/00 JOHNSON, BRIAN L 144.00
78126 04/28/00 KONG,TOMMY T 930.71
78127 04/28/00 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 1964.00
7812.8 04/28/00 WATCZAK,LAURA 2176.64
78129 04/28/00 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 2391.04
78130 04/28/00 HALE,THOMAS M 1490.90
78131 04/28/00 MEEHAN,JAMES 2314.23
78132 04/28/00 MORNING,TIMOTHY L 1305.33
78133 04/28/00 ACOSTA,MARK J 492.00
78134 04/28/00 AMBORN,JASON H 1416.00
78135 04/28/00 ANDERSON,BOBBIE J 648900
78136 04/28/00 ANDERSON,BRIAN 704.00
78137 04/28/00 ANDERSON,PHILIP A 702.00
78138 04/28/00 ANDERSON- JR,LAIRD 456.00
78139 04/28/00 AUBIN,DENNIS J 1176.00
78140 04/28/00 BAHL,DAVID C 1371.00
78141 04/28/00 BALAZS,JOSEPH M 228900
78142 04/28/00 BAUMAN,ANDREW C 525.00
78143 04/28/00 BECK,PATRICK L 782.00
78144 04/28/00 BOE,ERICK W 660.00
78145 04/28/00 BOLLES,THOMAS A 1818000
78146 04/28/00 BOURQUIN,RON G 802.00
78147 04/28/00 BRAATEN,HAROLD A 1018900
22
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78148 04/28/00 BUCHE,JOETTE 1476.00
78149 04/28/00 CAHILL,CHRISTOPHER S 1086.00
78150 04/28/00 CROMETT,MARK F 1450900
78151 04/28/00 DALY, FRANK 1453900
78152 04/28/00 DAWSON,RICHARD P 1203.00
78153 04/28/00 DIETZ,EDWARD W 1260.00
78154 04/28/00 DITTEL,MICHAEL A 1306.00
78155 04/28/00 DOREE,KURT A 1361.00
78156 04/28/00 DUELLMAN,AMY L 540.00
78157 04/28/00 DUELLMAN,JOSEPH W 396.00
78158 04/28/00 DUELLMAN,KIRK T 798.00
78159 04/28/00 DeMARS,TIMOTHY A 1792.00
78160 04/28/00 EKSTRAND,HOWARD R 780.00
78161 04/28/00 EVERSON,PAUL E 252900
78162 04/28/00 FASULO,WALTER R 1140900
78163 04/28/00 FETTERS,JEFFREY L 2038.00
78164 04/28/00 FITZGERALD,EDWARD P 432.00
78165 04/28/00 GERARD,JAMIE P 2686.00
78166 04/28/00 GERVAIS- JR,CLARENCE N 1536.00
78167 04/28/00 GRILL,CARL 828.00
78168 04/28/00 GROSCHEN,JOSEPH D 398.00
78169 04/28/00 HAKSETH,NATHAN I 580000
78170 04/28/00 HALE,JOSEPH E 230900
78171 04/28/00 HALE,THOMAS M 394.00
78172 04/28/00 HALWEG,KEVIN R 538900
23
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78173 04/28/00 HAMLIN,ANDREW G 642.00
78174 04/28/00 HAYES,JODI L 60.00
78175 04/28/00 HEFFERNAN,PATRICK E 1211.33
78176 04/28/00 HERLUND,RICK R 1774.00
78177 04/28/00 HJELLE,ERIK DAVID 10000
78178 04/28/00 HOHN,JAMES M 1208.00
78179 04/28/00 JOHNSON,ANDREA D 432.00
78180 04/28/00 JOHNSON,DOUGLAS R 1258.00
78181.04/28/00 KARNOWSKI,SANDRA J 720.00
78182 04/28/00 KNABE,WILLIAM H 1350.00
78183 04/28/00 KOEHN,CORY M 2123.00
78184 04/28/00 KOLASA,MARK A 804.00
78185 04/28/00 KONDER,RONALD W 2592900
78186 04/28/00 KORTUS,WILLIAM J 1292.00
78187 04/28/00 L'ALLIER,TED C 540.00
78188 04/28/00 LACKNER,GREGORY J 108.00
78189 04/28/00 LEDMAN,KEVIN 1754.00
78190 04/28/00 LEWSADER,PAUL J 36.00
78191 04/28/00 LIDBERG,MICHAEL A 1078.00
78192 04/28/00 LINN,BRYAN D 782900
78193 04/28/00 LOVE,NICOLE J 8000
78194 04/28/00 LUCERO,ROGER E 465900
78195 04/28/00 MALLORY,GORDON E 881900
78196 04/28/00 MARTY,MARK K 2196.00
78197 04/28/00 MELANDER,JON A 1495.00
24
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78198 04/28/00 MELANDER,SCOTT A 1382.00
78199 04/28/00 MELLEN,RICHARD T 656000
78200 04/28/00 MEYERS,PAUL E 1912.00
78201 04/28/00 MILLER,NICHOLAS J 972.00
78202 04/28/00 MONK,JOHN J 922.00
78203 04/28/00 MONROY,JON J 3836.00
78204 04/28/00 MCGOVERN,JOHN L 906.00
78205 04/28/00 NADEAU,AARON R 432.00
78206 04/28/00 NALIPINSKI,STEPHEN M 1654.00
78207 04/28/00 NEUMAN,BRIAN A 415.00
78208 04/28/00 NOLAN,PAUL W 540900
78209 04/28/00 NOVAK,JEROME R 649.00
78210 04/28/00 OLSON,KENNETH A 672.00
78211 04/28/00 PETERSON,MARK S 814.00
78212 04/28/00 PETERSON,RICHARD A 600.00
78213 04/28/00 PETERSON,ROBERT H 1798900
78214 04/28/00 PETERSON,THEODORE E 702.00
78215 04/28/00 PIERCE,SCOTT G 3686.00
78216 04/28/00 PILLAR,MICHAEL R 700.00
78217 04/28/00 POOLE,CHRISTOPHER C 400.00
78218 04/28/00 RICKETSON,BRENT L 1321900
78219 04/28/00 RONDEAU,WILLIAM R 24.00
78220 04/28/00 SCHADT,JEFFREY A 1892.00
78221 04/28/00 SCHOENECKER,THOMAS R 828.00
78222 04/28/00 SCHULTZ,THOMAS E 720.00
25
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78223 04/28/00 SEVERSON,DAVID A 1496.00
78224 04/28/00 SHANLEY,ROBERT J 564.00
78225 04/28/00 SIEDOW, ERIC R 492.00
78226 04/28/00 SIKORA,PAUL T 910000
78227 04/28/00 SINGER,SCOTT W 336.00
78228 04/28/00 SKOK,STEPHEN L 792.00
78229 04/28/00 SMITH,KEITH A 1170.00
78230 04/28/00 SMITH,MICHAEL T 766.00
78231 04/28/00 SMITH,RICHARD J 220.00
78232 04/28/00 STANWAY,ROBERT A 372.00
78233 04/28/00 SVENDSEN,RON 1044.00
78234 04/28/00 SVENDSEN,RUSTIN L 1818.00
78235 04/28/00 SZULIM,JERRY A 264.00
78236 04/28/00 TESSMER,TODD D 136.00
78237 04/28/00 TREPANIER,EUGENE 1398.00
78238 04/28/00 TRONNES,JOHN E 672.00
78239 04/28/00 UBEL,JEFFREY J 260.00
78240 04/28/00 VOGEL,JENNY B 20.00
78241 04/28/00 W LZ, JAMES G 1368900
78242 04/28/00 WATERS,JOSEPH D 1928.00
78243 04/28/00 WELDON,ROBERT W 684.00
78244 04/28/00 WHISLER,MICHAEL D 768900
78245 04/28/00 WHITE,JOEL A 673900
78246 04/28/00 WILSON,JASON M 2317.00
78247 04/28/00 ZASTROW,GREGG P 2112.00
26
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY.PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78248 04/28/00 ZIMMERMANN HOHN,ANN K 1145.00
78249 04/28/00 SVENDSEN,RUSTIN L 2000900
78250 04/28/00 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1564.03
78251 04/28/00 NIVEN,AMY S 539.53
7825.2 04/28/00 FREBERG,RONALD L 1614.43
78253 04/28/00 JONES DONALD R 1199.23
78254 04/28/00 ELIAS,JAMES G 1877.63
78255 04/28/00 KUNO,MICHAEL R 210900
78256 04/28/00 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 2166981
78257 04/28/00 EDSON,DAVID B 1713.25
78258 04/28/00 HELEY,ROLAND B 1590.43
78259 04/28/00 HINNENKAMP,GARY 1546.07
78260 04/28/00 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 1532.03
78261 04/28/00 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 1561.63
78262 04/28/00 TAUBMAN,KEVIN A 80.00
78263 04/28/00 KUDA,KRISTEN L 191.25
78264 04/28/00 MACY,RITA 24938
78265 04/28/00 SOUTTER,CHRISTINE 109.69
7.8266 04/28/00 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1508.03
78267 04/28/00 SCHMIDT,JASON E 1542.59
78268 04/28/00 ANDERSON,EVERETT 337.85
78269 04/28/00 OSTROM,MARJORIE 2213.63
78270 04/28/00 WENGER,ROBERT J 2148.59
78271 04/28/00 BRANDSTROM,RYAN M.126.00
78272 04/28/00 FINN,GREGORY S 1309.63
27
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78273 04/28/00 FLUG,ELAINE R 126.00
78274 04/28/00 FLUG,MEGAN L 67.50
78275 04/28/00 FRANK,LAURA 172900
78276 04/28/00 FRANK,STEVE 196.00
78277 04/28/00 GEBHARD,JILLIAN R 165.75
78278 04/28/00 LINN,TERI L 101.51
78279 04/28/00 McBRIDE,PATRICK D 42.60
78280 04/28/00 SCHNOBRICH,LAURIE K 126.00
78281 04/28/00 SHOBERG,KARI A 136950
78282 04/28/00 TVEDTEN,ERIK A 47.60
78283 04/28/00 GERMAIN,DAVID 2025.48
78284 04/28/00 NADEAU,EDWARD A 1108010
78285 04/28/00 SCHULTZ,SCOTT M 1594.19
78286 04/28/00 COONS,MELISSA 240933
78287 04/28/00 FALVEY,JENNIFER A 50.90
78288 04/28/00 GLASS,JEAN 883980
78289 04/28/00 HOIUM,SHEILA 944.20
78290 04/28/00 KARAS,TAMARA A 855.52
78291 04/28/00 OGREN,ALLISON A 132.60
78292 04/28/00 POWERS,NICOLE L 132.60
78293 04/28/00 RIDLEHOOVER,KATE I 154.70
78294 04/28/00 SALZBRENNER,HEIDI T 115960
78295 04/28/00 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 1251923
78296 04/28/00 SHOBERG,CARY J 596.67
78297 04/28/00 ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L.188900
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78298 04/28/00 ANDERSON,JULIE M 418.77
78299 04/28/00 ANDERSON,TIMOTHY R 268.55
78300 04/28/00 BACHMAN, NICOLE T 71.50
78301 04/28/00 BITTNER,KATIE C 168.23
78302 04/28/00 CHAPMAN,JENNY A 350.77
78303 04/28/00 DEMPSEY,BETH M 100.75
78304 04/28/00 DeGRAW,KRYSTAL M 331.26
78305 04/28/00 ERICKSON,CAROL A 40940
78306 04/28/00 FERRISE,CHRISTINA M 147.88
78307 04/28/00 FRUCI,REBECCA L 130.00
78308 04/28/00 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 347.30
78309 04/28/00 HAFNER,ALEXIS J 85.15
78310 04/28/00 HAWKE,RYAN A 425.93
78311 04/28/00 HEINN,REBECCA L 106.50
78312 04/28/00 HILLS,CHRISTINE M 84.50
78313 04/28/00 HOLMGREN,LEAH M 197.25
78314 04/28/00 HORNING,CHRISTOPHER M 35.00
78315 04/28/00 HOULE,DENISE L 232920
78316 04/28/00 HUPPERT,ERIN M 393.28
78317 04/28/00 IKHAML,JOHN 218.55
78318 04/28/00 JENSEN,SUSAN K 13.80
78319 04/28/00 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 218.05
78320 04/28/00 JOHNSON,STETSON 92.75
78321 04/28/00 JOHNSON,SUSAN M 90000
78322 04/28/00 JOPKE,KIMBERLEE J 236.39
7
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78323 04/28/00 JOVONOVICH,TODD R 78.20
78324 04/28/00 KAHLER,BRADLEY G 61.75
78325 04/28/00 KERSCHNER,BRANDON R 177.13
78326 04/28/00 KERSCHNER,JOLENE M 93.15
78327 04/28/00 KOEHNEN,MARY B 496.82
78328 04/28/00 KROLL,MARK J 27.20
78329 04/28/00 MEISEL,TAMBREY 321928
78330 04/28/00 MEVERDEN.,LAURA J 98.25
78331 04/28/00 MOSSONG,ANDREA M 156900
78332 04/28/00 MOTZ,ERIN M 179.44
78333 04/28/00 OIREAGAN,CHRISTINE 40.50
78334 04/28/00 OLSON,ABIGAIL E 175.50
78335 04/28/00 OWEN,JONATHAN 103.55
78336 04/28/00 PEHOSKI,JOEL T 111.35
78337 04/28/00 SMITLEY,SHARON L 203.00
78338 04/28/00 STEINKE,JACOB P 180.13
78339 04/28/00 SWANER,JESSICA 127.10
78340 04/28/00 THELL,HEIDI 36.00
78341 04/28/00 TIBODEAU,HEATHER J 40.28
78342 04/28/00 WEDES,CARYL H 117900
78343 04/28/00 WELTER,ELIZABETH M 216.15
78344 04/28/00 WHITE,TIMOTHY M 157.20
78345 04/28/00 WHITING,ROBIN A 65.00
78346 04/28/00 WILLIAMS,KELLY M 730907
78347 04/28/00 WOODMAN,ALICE E 170910
30
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
78348 04/28/00 ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L 164940
78349 04 / 2 8 / 00 BOSLEY , CAROL 211915
78350 04/28/00 GLASS,GILLIAN 67973
78351 04/28/00 GROPPOLI,LINDA M 173.25
78352 04/28/00 HANSEN,ANNA K 87.50
78353 04/28/00 HANSEN,EMILY J 39900
78354 04/28/00 HORNING,DANELLE M 48.00
78355 04/28/00 HUPPERT,ERICA L 72.00
78356 04/28/00 JOHNSON,NANCY A 105.00
78357 04/28/00 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 275.98
78358 04/28/00 ANTON,SARAH E 188.05
78359 04/28/00 BEHAN,JAMES 1304.03
78360 04/28/00 BLANCHARD,KEVIN J 113.40
78361 04/28/00 BUCHAN,DAVID M 194.88
78362 04/28/00 CHAPEAU,GREG M 458.85
78363 04/28/00 DOUGLASS,TOM 150.00
78364 04/28/00 GRENDZINSKI,DIANE J 129.15
78365 04/28/00 HERMES,MARK L 18.00
78366 04/28/00 JAHN,DAVID J 1328.83
78367 04/28/00 KOSKI,JOHN F 836.03
78368 04/28/00 KYRK,ASHLEY 90000
78369 04/28/00 LONETTI,JAMES F 628.98
78370 04/28/00 MATTESON,FRANK M 138.81
78371 04/28/00 MORIN,TROY J 150900
78372 04/28/00 PRINS,KELLY M 210.75
31
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE
78373
78374
7837.5
78376
78377
78378
o4 /ZS /oo
o4 /2s /oo
o4 /as /oo
o4 /ZS /oo
o4 /is /oo
o4 /2s /oo
EMPLOYEE NAME
REILLY,MICHAEL R
SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M
YOUNG,DILLON J
AICHELE,CRAIG J
MULVANEY,DENNIS M
PRIEM, STEVEN A.
AMOUNT
611971
178.47
550.10
1187.71
1727.23
1538.43
464534.20
32
AGENDA ITEM NO GZ
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: May 1, 2000
RE: Intoxicating Liquor License for Bennigan's
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Introduction
Ardeshir Boozary has submitted an application for an intoxicating liquor license for Den -Way, Inc.
Bennigan's) to be located at 1749 Beam Avenue.
Background
As required by City ordinances, the necessary background investigation was completed by the Police
Department on Mr. Boozary. Since Mr. Boozary's current residence and place of business is
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, the following checks were completed: Minnesota BCA, NCIC Criminal
History, Oklahoma City Police Department, Oklahoma County Sheriff's Office, Edmond Police
Department, and the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Law Enforcement Division.
There was nothing found that would prohibit him from holding a liquor license in the City. Mr.
Boozary has been given a copy of the City Code of Ordinances that apply to being an intoxicating
liquor license holder and he has met with Chief Winger.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the liquor license application.
Agenda # X7
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cler
DATE: May 1, 2000
RE: Food Permit Approval and Waiver of Fee
Introduction
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modred
Rejected
Boy Scout Troop 187 is having a fund raiser garage sale in the parking lot at Arlington Hills United
Methodist Church located at 759 East County Road B. The event will be held on Saturday, June 10th.
In conjunction with the rummage sale, the Troop is requesting a food permit to sell hot dogs and pop to
raise additional funds.
Background
The Troop will rely on donations from the community and church congregation for items to include in
their sale. The proceeds raised from the garage sale and from the sales of food will be used to purchase
equipment for the Troop to use on camping trips. They are requesting that the City waive the $43.00
permit fee as has been done in past years.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the miscellaneous permit to sell food at the Arlington
Hills United Methodist Church and to waive the $43.00 permit fee.
Agenda # G 4 _
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager fiction by Council
Date
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk Endorsed
Modified
DATE: May 1, 2000 Rejected
RE: Food Permit Approval and Waiver of Fee
Introduction
Cub Scout Pack 64 is having a fund raiser rummage sale at Cross Lutheran Church on May 20, 2000.
In conjunction with the rummage sale, they are requesting a food permit to sell hot dogs and toopp
raise additional money.
Background
Cub Scout Pack 64 is located out of Webster Elementary School. As part of scouting, the members
participate in activities that teach them responsibility and creativity. Some of the events planned for
this year are: scouting for food, pinewood derby, winter camping, and baseball.
To help support these activities, the Pack raises money each year conducting fund- raising events. This
year they have chosen to have a rummage sale at Cross Lutheran Church. To raise additional funds,
they have applied for a special one -day food permit to sell hot dogs and pop to those attending. Theg y
are requesting that the City waive the $43.00 permit fee. The fee was waived by Council last year.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the miscellaneous permit to sell food at the Cross
Lutheran Church and to waive the $43.00 permit fee.
Agenda G 5
Action by Council
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Ken Haider, Acting
Bruce K. Anderson
April 28, 2000 for the
nd Recreation
8, 2000 City Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Amendment to Nature Center Deed
INTRODUCTION
Date
indorsed
Modified
Rejected
The City of Maplewood received a grant from the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources to construct a new floating boardwalk. The boardwalk has been completed and the
project is in the process of being closed out. The State D. N. R. has requested that the city
amend the current deed for the nature center to ensure that it will remain as public lands. This
is a requirement for all state grant money.
BACKGROUND
The city attorney has drafted a resolution which outlines the two restrictions that would be
placed on the deed. In addition, the city attorney is currently in the process of amending the
deed and this would administratively follow City Council approval of the deed restrictions.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the enclosed reesolution amending the nature
center deed and furthermore, that the city attorney be directed to modify the nature center
deed to include the two restrictions as outlined in the resolution.
kd \ncdeed. mem
Enclosure
MEMORANDUM
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Department of Taxation conveyed to the City of
Maplewood certain tax forfeited lands, now known as the Maplewood Nature Center, in January,
1968.
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has requested that the City
of Maplewood amend the above- referenced deed to comply with the Department of Natural
Resources Outdoor Recreation Project Agreement.
AND WHEREAS, the above referenced deed will be amended to add the following
restrictions:
1. The property shall be managed and maintained for outdoor recreation
purposes consistent with the approved grant application; and
2. The property may not be used for any other purpose without the express
prior written approval of the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,
COUNTY OF RAMSEY, STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.That the City of Maplewood will amend the above - referenced deed to add the
restrictions requested by the Department of Natural Resources.
Dated this day of May, 2000
Mayor of Maplewood
City Clerk
12 -28 -1999 14: 04
r
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
500 Litfayelle REMKI
St. Pa111, Minim%ola 5155-40
February 4, 1999
Ms. Ann Hutchinson
Lead Naturalist
1830 East County Road 8
Maplewood, MN 56109
Re: OR99-015 Maplewood Nature Center
Requirement to revarcl condition on deed
Dear Ms. Hutchinson:
As a reminder, pisses have the following cond(tlon recorded an the
property deed and submit a copy for our records.
In order to comply with the Department of Nature! Resources outdoor
Recreadon Project Agreement, The <reclplent> does hereby impose the
following resfticfions on the propedy.9
1, The property shall be managed and maintained for outdoor
recreation purposes consistent with the approved grant
application,
2. 77te property may not be used for any other purpose without
the expresg prior written apprvvol of the Comrn/ssloner of the
Minnesota Department of Natural ResouMW&
if you have any questions, please feet free to contact me.
Thank you,
l
Audrey Mularie
Grant Manger.
661) 296 -4705
DNX Informal lio»: 612 -M -6157, I - 0).766.6W) • TTY: 612-296-3484 I 4W.657-3929
P.02
An Kiwi OPPIN'unity EmIlloyer Prfnced 6 +n Its y Ivil Nulxw Vantaininit a
Who Y 11 INV"Attx 0al Minimum of ttft wmk-
Agenda G
MEMORANDUM
Action by Council
TO: Ken Haider, Acting Cj
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, IN
DATE: May 1, 2000 for the M* 8,
ge
r ibV PArk
70uRecrea
ion
ncil Me ting
Park Imp ovements
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
SUBJECT: Budget Modification for Viscell
INTRODUCTION
The majority of park improvements are financed with city P.A.C. fund dollars. The P.A.C. fund
is financed through residential and commercial fees assessed at approval of a subdivision or
issuance of a building permit. The city utilizes the P.A.C. fund to finance all park acquisition
and development projects. The current 2000 projects include the nature center boardwalk
which has been completed, the community center fitness center, and Robinhood Park
improvements which are currently under construction.
The Parks and Recreation Department does not use tax monies for park improvements. The
funding source for the majority of park improvements is the P.A.C. fund, with projects
ultimately approved by the City Council through the capital improvement plan process.
BACKGROUND
During the past three months, our department has received numerous requests from
residents for minor /miscellaneous park projects. The park projects range from providing
fencing along the property line at Sunset Ridge Park to replacement of bleachers that were
removed due to state safety legislation, to minor playground improvements, i.e. additional
slide, swing replacements at neighborhood parks.
Staff recommends that the City Council allocate $50,000 from P.A.C. monies to be identified
as general park improvements. The general park improvements would be spread over a two -
year period and may include the aforementioned projects, but also minor park improvements
such as short trail corridor segments, trash receptacles, benches and new equipment.
The City Council allocated a similar project or account for park .improvements in 1996.
Although each individual project will not come before the City Council for review, staff will
provide the City Council with an update of the projects as they evolve through the monthly
update report and a final compilation of the park improvements.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council request the finance director prepare a budget
modification to include a line item in the P.A.C. fund in the amount of $50,000 from the
uncommitted P.A.C. fund balance for minor park improvements.
kdlpkimprov. mem
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Park Development Fund
Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
Three Months Ended March 31, 2000
2000
Variance -
Amended Favorable
Acct. No. Budget. Actual (Unfavorable
3801 Interest on investments 7,700.00 13,490.87 5,790.87
3804 Sale of property 0.00 0.00 0.00
3851 Park availability charges - residential 122 10 112,200.00)
3852 Park availability charges - commercial 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total revenue 130 23 (106,409.13)
4480 Fees for service 1 0.00 1
4490 Fees - consulting 390.00 0.00 390.00
4660 Construction - building 359 99 260
4710 Land purchases 0.00 0.00 0.00
4720 Park development projects 289 20,701.86 269 168.14
4762 Land - easements 0.00 0.00 0.00
4930 Investment management fees 500.00 1,317.50 817.50C )
4960 Engineering charges - General Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total expenditures
Excess (deficit) of revenue
over expenditures
652,080.00 121 530
521,980.00) (97,668.87) 424,311.13
Fund balance - beginning
Fund balance - ending
1,034,234.40 1 0.00
512,254.40 $936,565.53 $424,311.13
c:and Recreation Commission
Park and Recreation Director
Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual
Three Months Ended March 31, 2000
Project # and Title Budget Actual Balance
301 Edgerton Park Improvements 32 0.00 32,945.00
302 Robinhood Park. Improvements 91 0.00 91 330.00
303 Comprehensive Parks & Open Space Plan 390.00 0.00 390.00
304 Minor Site Amenities 6 6,876.47 841.47
305 Hazelwood Park Expansion 50 0.00 50,000.00
306 Community Center Fitness Area 359,670.00 99,340.38 260 329.62
307 Nature Center Boardwalk 100,000.00 0.00 100
369 Nature Center Development 0.00 0.00 0.00
379 Maplecrest Park Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00
383 Nature Center Boardwalk 0.00 130.80 130.80C )
385 Four Seasons Park Improvements 9,560.00 7 1,835.00
386 Maplewood Heights Park Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00
388 Afton Heights Park Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00
391 Kohiman Lake Overlook Development 0.00 0.00 0.00
392 Open Space Improvements 0.00 5,969.59 5 969.59C, )
393 Gladstone Baseball Field 0.00 0.00 0.00
399 Administrative Fees 2,150.00 1 832 .50
652,080.00 121 5309720.26
AGENDA ITEM No. G .
AGENDA REPORT
To: Acting City Manager Ken Haider /
From: Chief of Police Donald Winger
Subject: Bids For Used Vehicles
Date: April 27, 2000
Introduction
Action by Council
Date -- 0
Endorsed a ON
Modified
Rejected
On April 21, 2000, at 2:00 p.m., bids were opened for used police and forfeited vehicles
that were advertised in the Maplewood Review on April 5 2000.p ,
Background
Past practice has been that all bids in excess of $1,000 be submitted to the City Council
for approval.
The following is a list of vehicles with bids in excess of $1,000:.
Unit #1
Unit #2
Unit #3
Unit #5
Unit #6
Unit #7
Unit #8
Unit #9
Unit #10
Unit #11
Unit #12
Recommendation
1990 Ford Taurus
1990 Ford Taurus
1992 Cadillac
1994 Ford Explorer
1985 Chevrolet Suburban
1992 Chevrolet Impala
1992 Chevrolet Impala
1992 Chevrolet Impala
1993 Chevrolet Impala
1994 Chevrolet Impala
1986 Ford Ambulance
It is recommended that the bids be accepted.
Action Required
Submit to the City Council for review and approval.
1,160.00
1,160.00
4,750.00
4,000.00
1,460.00
2,089.00
1,629.00
2
2,389.00
2,897.00
1,501.99
DSW: js
AGENDA ITEM NO G8
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review — Pep Boys
LOCATION: South of 2570 White Bear Avenue
DATE: April 19, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed.
Modified
Rejected
The conditional use permit (CUP) for Pep Boys Automotive Center is due for review. This permit
is for a maintenance garage located south of 2570 White Bear Avenue. Refer to the maps on
pages 2-4 and the letter on pages 5-6.
CODE REQUIREMENT
Section 36 -444 states all CUPs shall be reviewed by the city council within one year of the date
of initial approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may grant up to one
one -year extension of the permit if just cause is shown.
BACKGROUND
May 10, 1999: The city council approved a wetland buffer variance, the CUP and the design.
The CUP was subject to the conditions on page 8.
DISCUSSION
The applicant has applied for a building permit and is working on completing the requirements to
obtain this permit and begin construction. One item we still need is verification that the wetland -
protection buffer easement has been recorded.
According to code, if the applicant does not start construction by May 10, 2001, this permit will
end.
RECOMMENDATION
The council should review the conditional use permit for the Pep Boys Automotive Center south
of 2570 White Bear Avenue in one year if construction has started. If the applicant does not
begin construction within one year, this permit shall end as required by the code.
p:sec111pepboys.rev
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Applicant's Letter dated April 4, 2000
5. CUP Conditions dated May 10, 1999
Attachment 1
o WOODLYNi
o
0 LYDIA a a
01 I..:
O 3 !t` P' W W
Go
2 g = 0 m
ST w x v W N
e y Y
O Q W
n C S N
D
AVE. 6EAM btoN u -
MAPLE '
l9 19 Y
U
o RADATZ < o:
0
3 W MESSA81 AVMA)i
w lid W
RAMSEY
Cr.
Vi COUNTY Q'
COURT co •
v w KOHLMAN Case
Z
Hieorthwo AVE. W LakeQodW
23
Perk c
zQW
m - .l o
Z t N
Q o 3
z EDGEHILL RD. JW
Li
DEMONT
la. '
AVE : :::•: . Q
CLMKSAVE. BROOKS •
AVE. EL EV
EX TANT v~i Four AVE,
AVE. m P Q
is W GERVAISQ
EW AVE. z CT.
W X
DR.
Y _j
E• TLE AVE.Knuc ad Lake
CAS NOW ZUAVE. COPE AVE. P
111", g r
Q v LARK Q AVE. a to
N Z LAURIE RD.
shwwoodo LAURIE Z RD. W ? /i O
Z Pork }
J W U W
M AVE. 0 ,;, v c _ —
Z QWW65 = F--
cn 0 Y CO. RD. > 6
Communl "
0 BURKE AVE. Confer G` v •
o
John Grsnn
W
Go # tewo
LOCATION MAP
2
4
N
mffmw
Attachment 2
N •32 WI (33) ZS 5 ,14 1 13 1 ,10 9 8 7 6 5 4r3 —
C•ssj 40j, S!
i +? ` ` ZS2627281617t192021
rq
EDGE HILL
MOGREas• SUPER AMERICA' : 2 03
LANDSCAPING ? I5 13 12 II 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 , c
ow
i ac _
27 Zd 29 30 W 16 17 18 19 20 21 23'.24 25 6 27 829 EjitrV
f • 9
AUTO CENTER _ _ . ___ ••Aftp AVE.
old
l7 —. 2se
B
IS 14 13 12 it 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2 11
Zs,z98
4 ZZ
NTB - _ _- ci
116 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 4 5 6 7 829 30
MAPLERIDGE i #: a N .. .... .. .. .. .. .... e .
SHOPPING CE -LATER .:.::..::..::..:.::.:: .:.
PROPOSEDssI onSED:::•.:::
a3'' f xx,
A
ro t. e r z . • : PEP BAYS •' :. r Q 311 1,
S INGLE DWELLING
uses ::SINGLE DWELLING ••-' a •
3rD
3S
4
0
0
r
e
f
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
3
4
N
RAINBOW FOODS I
Attachment 3
opp: rc or ve :tw; - "a
V ft of
NTB
8 ' .90.48
di
6z
1 t
Her 1pW-
PROFESSIONAL ORM &MMOU"
BUILDING
SITE PLAN
4
4
Attachment 4
ROBERT L HOFFMAN L A R K I N H O F F M A D LGERALDH. FRIEDELL N A L Y CAL I N D G R E N, LTD .ANDREW F. PERRIN
EDWARD J. DRISCOLL FREDERICK W. NIEBUHR
GENE N . FULLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW RENEE L. JACKSON
JOHN D. FULLMER
FRANK I. HARVEY
WILLIAM G. THORNTON
ANN M. MEYER
CHARLES S..MODELL CHRISTOPHER K. LARUS
CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN 1500 NORWEST FINANCIAL CENTER DOUGLAS M. RAMLER
LINDA H. FISHER
THOMAS P. SACKMA N 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
STEPHEN J. KAMINSKI
THOMAS F. ALEXANDER
DANIEL T. KADLECMICHAELC. JCKMAN
JOHN DIE SHARNA A WAHLGREN
JON S. SWIERZEVNSKI BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 -1194 JOHN F. KLOS
THOMAS J. FLYNN ADAMS. HUHTA "
JAMES P. QUINN TELEPHONE (952) 835 -3800 NICHOLAS _S A. . J VUETSTRA
TODD 1. FREEMAN
GERALD L.' SECK FAX (952) 896 -3333
C. ERIK HAWES
JOHN E. YONKER
JOHN B.
LAN *
IST
DAYLE NOLAN
JAMES M. SUSAG
DANIEL J. BALLINTINE
JOHN A. COTTER
PAUL B .JEFFREY D. CAHILLILDOWTTALANLL. KILDOW SONYA R. BRAUNSCHWEIG
KATHLEEN M. PICOTTE NEWMAN JOSEPH J. FITTANTE, JR.
MICHAEL B. N CYNTHIA M. KLAUS
GREGORY E. . KORSTAD MARK O. CHRISTOPHERSON
GARY A. VAN CLEVE M. SHANE SWANSON
DANIEL BOWIES NEAL J. BLANCHETT
TIMOTHYY J. KEANE TAMARA O'NEILL MORELAND
ALAN M. ANDERSON JAMES A. MCGREEVY, III
MICHAEL W. SCHL.EY THOMAS A. GUMP "
RONN S. KREPS TODD A. TAYLOR
TERRENCE E. BISHOP r -
GARY A. RENNEKE rr -OF COUNSEL
JAMES P. LARKIN '
KENDEL J. OHLROGGE
ISTHAL
JACK F. OALY
BRUCE J. DOUGLAS l D. KENNETH LINDGREN
WILLIAM C. GRIFFITH, JR.
JOHN R. HILL
s -,
200
ALLAN E. MULLIGAN
JOSEPH GITIS
PETER J. COYLE
LARRY D. MARTIN ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN
JAJ E. BRE.MER ONLY ADMITTED IN CALIFORNIA
JOHN J. STEFFENHAGEN
MICHAEL J. SMITH
April 4, 2000
Mr. Tom Ekstrand
Associate Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: Pep Boys, White Bear Avenue
Our File No. 23,416 -04
Dear Mr. Ekstrand:
On May 10, 1999, the Maplewood City Council approved Pep Boys' application for a wetland buffer
variance, conditional use permit and design approval of architectural site and landscape plans. Pe Boyssy
has closed on the land purchase, but for a variety of reasons has not been able to begin construction of the
project. Our review of the record indicates that there is no time limit on the wetland buffer variance but
that the conditional use permit becomes null and void if construction has not been substantially started
within one year of City Council approval. Also, the site plan earsapprovalmustberepeatedintwoppY
May 2001) if the City has not issued a building permit for this project.
In view of the foregoing, Pep Boys requests a one -year extension of its conditional use permit. If this
request is granted by the City Council, it is our understanding that the extended conditional use permit
would expire on May 10, 2001. The site plan review would also expire on this same date.
After you have had an opportunity to review this letter, please call me to confirm that we have requested
the necessary permit extensions to allow Pep Boys to begin construction in spring 2001. Also, please let
me know whether our request would be considered by the City Council at its April 24, 2000 or
May 8, 2000 Council meeting.
5
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
Mr. Tom Ekstrand
April 4, 2000
Page 2
Thanks again for your continuing cooperation.
Sincerely,
Linda H. Fisher, for
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd.
cc: Nick Aspras, Pep Boys
Tom Ryckman, Casco Corporation
0569386.01
6
phis easement before the city will issue a building permit. The wetland- buffer
easement shall cover all of the site east of the parking lot curbing.
Attachment 5
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
Councilmember Koppers moved /introduced the following Resolution annri a conditional use
408 • .. w • . I I A - - A - - A JL - -- - - - A - - 1 - - - - - L 1- _ t A f' A
99 -05 -034
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Pep Boys Automotive Centers applied fora conditional use permit fora motor
vehicle maintenance garage for the new Pep Boys automotive - service center:
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property on the east side of White Bear Avenue south
of 2570 White Bear Avenue. The legal description is:
Parcel A: That part of the South 4 acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, which lies
Easterly of the centerline of White Bear Avenue and Southerly of the North 216.00
feet, according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof. Ramsey County, Minnesota.
Parcel 6: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, lying Easterly of the
centerline of White Bear Avenue, except the South 495 feet thereof, according to the
U.S. Government Survey thereof. Ramsey County, Minnesota.
Parcel C: The North 150 feet of the South 495 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11,, Township 29, Range 22, lying
Easterly of the centerline of White Bear Avenue except that part of the above
described premises formerly known as and described as Lot 24, Block 1, Florence Park,
now vacated, according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Ramsey County,
Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On April 19, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this permit.
2. On May 10, 1999 the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approves this
permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
7
5 -10 -99
4..,, use would not involve any activity process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets .
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause-minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this
deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. There shall not be any outdoor storage of materials or discarded tires, parts or
refuse. There shall not be any over-night outdoor storage of vehicles.
5. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan to staff for approval of the plantings in
the wetland buffer area.
Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes -all
II' tt ! 111111q I 111pliq 11111 • - ii • ' • • • • ' •1 ' • 1 : II ' • . 1 i++4.''"•]ii]i••I•
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit
for this project.
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall:
a. Dedicate a wetland- buffer easement. This easement shall describe the boundary
of the buffer and prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumpl*ng
within the buffer, except for required landscaping and seeding. The applicant
shall record the deed for this easement before the city will issue a building
permit. The wetland- buffer easement shall cover all of the Pep Boys property
east of the parking lot curbing.
b. Revise the site plan by widening the southerly landscaped strip by five feet.
This
five -foot widening is derived from narrowing the northerly green area by five
feet.
5 -10 -99
Ps
AGENDA ITEM H
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Hazelwood Street Improvements, City Project 99 -07
Assessment Hearing, 7 p.m., Monday, May 8, 2000
DATE: May 1, 2000
Action. by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Booklets for the proposed assessments have been provided separately as a
supplement to the agenda. The proposed assessments are the same as were outlined
in the feasibility study and as were presented at the neighborhood meetings. The
proposed assessments have been mailed out to the affected property owners, providing
them with the specific assessment information for their properties.
The total amount proposed to be assessed is $282,750. This amount includes street
and storm sewer assessments for those living directly adjacent to Hazelwood Street,
and the storm sewer only assessments for those living in the project sub - watershed
area.
Staff has held a series of four meetings with the residents living along Hazelwood
Street. Those residents living in the project sub - watershed area, but who will not be
directly impacted by the construction, were not included in the neighborhood meeting
process.
There are 33 property owners directly adjacent to Hazelwood Street. Average
attendance at the neighborhood meetings was 38% with the greatest attendance of
58% at the project open house on March 28. Seventy percent of the households had
attended at least one of the four meetings.
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached Resolution for the
Adoption of the Assessment Roll for Project 99 -07.
CIVIC
jc
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city
council has met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment
for the construction of Hazelwood Street Improvements as described in the files of the
city clerk as Project 99 -07, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems
just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special
assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is
hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 15, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first
Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.0 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment
shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until
December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest
for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in
the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds
by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the
assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not
made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for
the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such
assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which
may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or
improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby
declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section
420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the
assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements.
5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment
to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal
taxes.
City of Maplewood
Official Sign -Up Sheet
By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the
Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes.
I *
z.
3.
5.1:5AA
6., c fA "I d
Address
A 11:
b_
io.
12.
13.
14.
Name (first &last) - please print
AGENDA ITEM NOm
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit — Club F.T.S.
LOCATION: 1351 Frost Avenue
DATE: April 18, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Request I Proposal
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected Now
Ron Michaletz is requesting a CUP (conditional use permit) to operate a coffee lounge in the
former) Miller Meats building at 1351 Frost Avenue. Club F.T.S. (Freedom Through Sobriety)
would be an alcohol -free lounge for adults to meet and socialize. Refer to maps on pages 4 -5
and the letter on page 6. The applicant would occupy the remaining vacant space in this building
located between the Maplewood Bakery and the Senior Recovery Program, a senior citizen
chemical dependency clinic.
Code Requirement
Section 36 -155 of the zoning code requires a CUP for restaurants in a BC(M) (business
commercial modified) district. According to the BC(M) regulations, the closest description of the
applicants proposal would be a restaurant.
DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit
The proposed use is appropriate for this location. The only potential problem staff can see is
noise. If complaints arise by the homeowners on Clarence Street due to late night noise (cars
starting, patrons talking in the parking lot), the city council may wish to adjust the hours of
operation or reconsider this permit.
Site and Building Issues
Parking would not be an issue since this coffee lounge would have evening hours and not conflict
with the daytime hours of the bakery, tattoo parlor and the Senior Recovery Program. There are
several site and building problems that should be corrected, however. The parking lot needs
restriping, the back of the building is littered with discarded materials, there is a broken window
on the "Permanent Skin Art" store front, there should be a gate on the trash enclosure and the
canopy over the sidewalk is in disrepair. As a condition of this permit, the city council should
require that the property owner restripe the parking lot and see to these maintenance issues.
The clean -up, building maintenance and parking lot striping are required by city code. If the
applicant does not proceed with this proposal, or if the city council denies the CUP, the property
owner should still be required to do these things.
COMMITTEE ACTION
April 17, 2000: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP and the alternative
requirement for clean -up and repairs.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 7 -8 approving a conditional use permit for a coffee lounge at
1351 Frost Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by the code and subject to:
1. All construction, renovations and improvements shall comply with the building code.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year, unless the use is in operation and
there have been no complaints or problems. In this event, the conditional use permit
shall be reviewed again only if a problem arises.
4. The hours of operation shall be: 4 p.m. to 10 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 4 p.m.
to 1 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The city council may review these hours and make
adjustments as warranted if there are complaints.
5. Before the city issues an occupancy certificate for this use, the property owner shall clean
up the property behind the building, repair the canopy on the front of the building, replace
the broken window pane on "Permanent Skin Art," install a 100 percent solid gate on the
front of the trash enclosure and restripe the parking lot.
B. The property owner shall clean up the property behind the building, repair the canopy on the
front of the building, replace the broken window pane on "Permanent Skin Art," install a 100
percent solid gate on the front of the trash enclosure and restripe the parking lot. These
items shall be performed even if the applicant drops his request or if the city council denies
the conditional use permit. The deadline for this work shall be two months from the date of
this council action.
2
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: .74 acres
Existing land use: Maplewood Bakery, Senior Recovery Program and a tattoo shop
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Future Gladstone Fire Station No. 2
South: Frost Avenue, Mike's LP and Richard's Market
East: Clarence Street and the Webster Dental parking lot
West: Gladstone Fire Station property and Ramsey County trail
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: BC(M)
Zoning: BC(M)
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36- 155(c)(3) requires a CUP for restaurants in a BC(M) district.
Criteria for Conditional Use Permit Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. Refer to
the findings in the resolution on pages 7-8.
Application Date
We received this application on March 17, 2000. State law requires that the city take action within 60
days. City Council action is required by May 17, 2000.
p:sec15 \clubfts.cup
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Properly Line/Zoning Map
3. Applicant's letter date - stamped March 17, 2000
4. CUP Resolution
3
Attachment 1
PALM r "' K
R•C1
CT. P W s a
N
CONNOR Cdr pVE. CO R
DEMO AVE.
W W
z UO BROD S 'CT.
EXTANT4>
a
AVE. c
GERVAIS
PKW
F
vp a
z P N
2
W EDGEHILL RD.
t DEMONT AVE.
BROOK AVE. BROOKS
AVE. o
SEX TANT Z
Fow : .
AVE. I ° Vi
arc
W tk %v t. GERVACAVE. _ >. GER'VAIS
EL
v.
GRANDVIEW AVE.
VIKING DR.
in
SHERREN AVE. %dp%a 1 6u.
Q C COPE - ----- AVE. COPE AVE. P
jDLARK
Cl. v AVE. LARK a AVE. a1 -+Keller j : , o , n n Z LAURIE
Lake ;, ° CO. < RD. N v LAURIE RD. Zsn«wvod o LAURIE ° RD
t LELAND RD. t ? SAND URST AVE.
Z WJUNCTIONAVE. 8 Y CO. RD. > 8
BURKE CT.
RICE AVE. m BURKE AVE. c ® BURKE AVE.
1) CHAMBERS STD t . •t 1 f/P t;
1 ° ELOR IDG AVE. gAVE AM c«N
LN. c •\
RSE t; p,VE. BELMONT AVE.
I COU Gotew c rw Ho
I G0 SKILL AV E. J
Q. MAN AVE. HARRIS AVE. 4J
000
5 SH ROSEWOOD AVE. N.
o RYA V font AN AV.
OSEW D
AVE. S. RAMSEY COUNTY
VE W v' NURSING HOME AND
TrGil Co ' a FAIR GROUNDS
t I v~i aw•
FROST AVE. ALORICH GOODRICH
W FE
0.
NTON AVE. z ^ >- ® COURSE PJ,
SUz .r
W
o R AVE. ARENA Q
3 W MER o o ® g'•
3 GO ° FRISBIE AVE. w < • epoodA*
a nSy
gP
3 RIP LEY .
v z r" o RIPLEY AVE.
G Wakefield °
t , SO PH IA o O Lake ° o m ® n KINGSTON AV
d S AVE ZRoun : Y HIA } ' W
Q = v PRICELakeI
t
YLoke
1 PRICE tV ` .. o c,
Pholen
LOCATION MAP
4
4
N
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
5
4
N
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
To Whom It May Concern.,
Club F.T.S.
A Non- Profit Establishment
Our intended use is to provide a safe, clean, alcohol -free
environment for adults, where they can enjoy a cup of coffee or soda,
socialize, play a _game of pool or d listen to jukebox music, and
not be subject to a drinking environment. Age requirements would be
set for after 9:00 p.m. Our location would be in between. a bakery and
a senior citizen chemical dependency treatment center, which would
help and complement all of our establishments.
A place like this is needed to give adults in the community an
alternative to the "bar scene ".
Our hours would be approximately: 4:00p.m.- 10:00p.m.,Sun.-
Thurs.; 4:00p.m.- 1:00a.m., Fri.-Sat,, The entertainment would be two
pool tables, two d and a jukebox. There will be seating for
approximately occupants. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely.,
Ron Michal
n
W lit1Unu
Q
Ct
Attachment 4
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Ron Michaletz applied for a conditional use permit for a coffee shop in a BC(M) (business
commercial modified) district.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1351 Frost Avenue. The legal description is:
G LA DSTO N E, RAMS EY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, BLOCK 7
WHEREAS, `the history' of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On April 17, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On May 8, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a
chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use
permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with
the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into
the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
FA
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction, renovations and improvements shall comply with the building code.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit
shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year, unless the use is in operation and there have
been no complaints or problems. In this event, the conditional use permit shall be reviewed again
only if a problem arises.
4. The hours of operation shall be: 4 p.m. to 10 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 4 p.m. to 1 a.m.
Friday and Saturday. The city council may review these hours and make. adjustments as
warranted if there are complaints.
5. Before the city issues an occupancy certificate for this use, the property owner shall clean up the
property behind the building, repair the canopy on the front of the building, replace the broken
window pane on "Permanent Skin Art," install a 100 percent solid gate on the front of the trash
enclosure and restripe the parking lot.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on May 8, 2000.
X"J
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, APRIL 17, 2000
V. NEW BUSINESS
C. Club FTS Conditional Use Permit (1351 Frost Avenue)
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. There were no questions from the
commissioners. Ron Michaletz, the applicant, had no comments other than he wanted to get
the project going.
Mr. Michaletz said interior building improvements will be made. He said the exterior repairs are
the responsibility of the landlord. Commissioner Mueller asked what would happen if the
property owner did not make the required repairs. Melinda Coleman, director of community
development, was concerned that the deadline for the repairs was two months after the
scheduled council action. Mr. Roberts thought Item B in the Recommendations was added as a
surety measure to make certain repairs are made to the property in the event that this
conditional use permit was not approved.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a coffee lounge at
1351 Frost Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by the code and subject to:
1. All construction, renovations and improvements shall comply with the building code.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or
the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one
year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year, unless the use is in operation and
there have been no complaints or problems. In this event, the conditional use permit
shall be reviewed again only if a problem arises.
4. The hours of operation shall be: 4 p.m. to 10 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 4 p.m.
to 1 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The city council may review these hours and make
adjustments as warranted if there are complaints.
5. Before the city issues an occupancy certificate for this use, the property owner shall
clean up the property behind the building, repair the canopy on the front of the building,
replace the broken window pane on "Permanent Skin Art," install a 100 percent solid
gate on the front of the trash enclosure and restripe the parking lot.
B. The property owner shall clean up the property behind the building, repair the canopy on the
front of the building, replace the broken window pane on "Permanent Skin Art," install a 100
percent solid gate on the front of the trash enclosure and restripe the parking lot. These
items shall be performed even if the applicant drops his request or if the city council denies
the conditional use permit. The deadline for this work shall be two months from the date of
this council action.
Planning Commission -2-
M i n utes of 04x-17 -2004
Commissioner frost second`ede Ayes ---all
The motion passed.
City of Maplewood
Official Sign -Up Sheet
By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the
r
i
z
3
4.
5.
6.
7.
Of
8. VV*"%- <z,
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
AGENDA ITEM NO ,.,
Act? ai by Council
MEMORANDUM Date
Endorsed
TO: City Manager Modified
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Rejected
SUBJECT: Setback Variances, Conditional Use Permit and Design Review
PROJECT: Forest Products
LOCATION: Northeast Corner of Highway 61 and County Road C
DATE: April 18, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Conrad Solberg, of Forest Products, is proposing to build an 8,400- square -foot cabinet -shop
building at the northeast corner of Highway 61 and County Road C. Refer to the maps on pages
9 -11. (This property includes a 40 -foot -wide strip of wooded land on the east side of the
frontage road. The applicant would not include this strip in his development. It would remain as
is.)
The proposed building would be constructed of decorative concrete block with cedar trim. Refer
to the building elevations.
Requests
The applicant is requesting approval of the following:
1. A 22 -foot building setback variance from the Highway 61 right -of -way. The code requires a
30 -foot setback. The proposed building would be placed at a setback ranging from eight to
20 feet. Refer to the letter on page 13.
2. A seven -foot parking lot setback variance from the frontage road right -of -way. The code
requires a 15 -foot setback. A corner of the proposed easterly parking lot would have an
eight -foot setback. Refer to the letter on page 14.
3. A conditional use permit (CUP) to build their building closer than 350 feet to a residential
zoning district. The nearest residential district is 100 feet to the west —the center of
Highway 61. (The nearest developable property in this residential district is 750 feet away.)
4. Approval of site, landscape and architectural plans.
DISCUSSION
Setback Variances
This site is difficult to develop because of the triangular shape of the lot. This unique shape,
along with a very wide highway boulevard (75 feet), provides a basis for variance approval. The
typical boulevard width is 12 to 15 feet. The proposed building would end up with a setback from
the highway shoulder of 83 feet. This is a much greater setback than would typically be
provided. _
Staff also supports the proposed parking lot setback variance. The small point of the parking lot
that would encroach into the 15 -foot setback by the frontage road would be insignificant. Staff
would not support this reduction if the encroachment included the entire length of the parking lot.
Conditional Use Permit
The intent of the code, which requires a CUP for buildings closer than 350 feet to a residential
district, is to give the city an opportunity to require additional buffering to protect homeowners.
In this case, the residential district near the proposed lot is the center of the highway right -of -way.
The nearest developable residential land, furthermore, is 750 feet away.
The proposed building would be about 200 feet from the nearest homes to the east and south.
These homes, however, are on land planned and zoned for M -1 (light manufacturing). Because
of the M -1 zoning, the code does not require a CUP for the proximity to these homes. The city
council should consider methods like hours .of operation, screening and light -glare control to
protect these nearby residents from disturbances.
Noise
The applicant should make every attempt to keep machine noise to a minimum. Work should not
be done with the doors open. If the dust collector system by the dock causes excessive noise,
the property owner should take steps to provide sound dampening.
Building Design
The proposed building would be attractive and would fit the character of this highway - frontage
business location.
Landscaping
The proposed landscaping would be attractive. Staffs only suggestion, however, is that the
three Black Hills Spruce trees proposed at the southwest corner of the building be switched with
the nine Japanese Red Spirea shown at the southeast corner of the site. Spruce in this location
would provide better screening for the homes on this side.
Site Lights
The applicant should provide a lighting plan indicating the light spread and fixture design. The
lighting code requires a plan when near homes. The fixtures installed should be a design that
hides the bulb and lens from view to avoid nuisances.
Shoreland Ordinance
This property is within the Kohlman Lake shoreland boundary area. The code allows up to 50
percent impervious - surface coverage, if the applicant provides an on -site method for reducing
storm water flow or provides for the treatment of runoff. The applicant is proposing a holding
pond at the north end of the site to satisfy this requirement.
In 1998, when we reviewed the Delavari convenience store proposal, the planning commission
raised. a question about compliance with the land coverage requirements in the shoreland
ordinance. As mentioned, the ordinance allows the developer to cover 50 percent of their land if
they provide a storm -water management control method. The ordinance states, though, that the
2
impervious surface area limits shall be determined using the total developable area of the parcel
above the ordinary high -water level and suitable for development), exclusive of streets and
sidewalks.
The planning commission felt that the 40- foot -wide strip of land east of the frontage road .is not
developable due to setback constraints it should not, therefore, be considered part of the site.
Staff has taken a different interpretation in that the "developable area" constraint refers to land
that is undevelopable because it is below the ordinary high -water level and, consequently,
undevelopable. All lots have portions that could be deemed undevelopable because of setback
requirements. Staff does not believe this is the intent of the ordinance.
The city should not permit this 40 -foot strip to be split away from the main parcel since the
development on the proposed site would then total 55 percent impervious - surface coverage. As
proposed, there would be 42 percent coverage because the 10,311- square -foot strip east of the
frontage road is part of the total property square footage.
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
April 11, 2000: The community design review board recommended approval of the plans and the
setback variances.
April 17, 2000: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on page 15 approving a 22 -foot building setback variance from the
Highway 61 right -of -way and a seven -foot parking lot setback variance from the frontage road
right -of -way. The code requires 30 feet and 15 feet. These variances are based on the
following findings:
1. Compliance with the code would cause the developer undue hardship because of the
unusual triangular- shaped lot. The lot shape makes it difficult to meet setback
requirements because of its tapered shape.
2. Approval of the building setback variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the ordinance because of the wide highway boulevard.
3. Approval of the parking lot setback variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent
of the ordinance because only a point of the parking lot would encroach into the setback
area.
B. Adopt the resolution on pages 16 -17 approving a conditional use permit to build a cabinet
shop that would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district at the northeast corner of
Highway 61 and County Road C. Approval is based on the findings required by the ordinance
and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
3
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4.. The city shall not allow a lot division to occur that would separate the 40 -foot -wide portion
of this site from the main part unless the shoreland ordinance would continue to be met.
5. Work should not be done with the doors open. If the dust collector system by the dock
causes excessive noise, the property owner should take steps to provide sound
dampening.
6. There shall not be any outdoor storage unless the city council approves a conditional use
permit for outdoor storage.
C. Approve the plans date - stamped March 15, 2000 for the proposed Forest Products cabinet
shop at the northeast corner of Highway 61 and County Road C. The owner shall do the
following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit:
a. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. An oil skimming device shall be
included at the outlet of the holding pond and maintained at a frequency determined
by staff.
b. Revised plans showing:
1) A handicap - parking space that is eight feet wide with an adjacent eight -foot -wide
loading space.
2) Switching the three Black Hills Spruce at the southwest corner of the building with
the nine Japanese Red Spirea at the southeast corner of the site.
3) A site lighting plan showing the light spread and fixture design. The light fixtures
must have concealed lenses and bulbs to properly shield glare from the residents.
3. Complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
b. Install a handicap - parking sign for the handicap - parking space.
c. Paint all rooftop mechanical equipment, stacks and vents to match the uppermost
part of the building. Roof -top equipment must be screened from view from the homes
to the south and east if the roof design does not provide adequate screening.
d. Install and maintain an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas.
2
e. Stripe all customer parking spaces at a width of 9 %2 feet and the employee spaces at
nine feet.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work.
The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished
landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or
winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or
summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished
work.
5. Signs are not part of this approval. The applicant shall apply for sign permits with staff.
6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
5
CITIZENS COMMENTS
I surveyed the 23 property owners within 350 feet of this site. We received these two replies:
1. I think this would be a good business for this area and would have a small impact on theneighborhood. (Leonard, 2627 Duluth Street)
2. Who the heck wants a manufacturing business there ?! ! If the city as previousl dencestorethenwhy
y P y clined agas/convenience y approve any other type of business? Absolutely not! Whydoesn't the cc ty clean it up and simply make it a "beautiful space" making small park?Street)Bertelsen, 2631 Duluth Stre 9
3. No objections. (Genereux, 2633 Duluth Street)
M
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 33,708 square feet (proposed site) with 10,311 square feet east of the frontage roadtobeleftundeveloped. Total land area is 44,019 square feet (one acre).
Existing land use: Undeveloped
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: -- Highway 61
South: County Road C and Lakeview Lutheran Church
West: Highway 61 - west of the highway is undeveloped propertyaroada
p p p yEast: Frontage and single dwellings
PAST ACTIONS
March 30, 1998: The city council denied the following requests by Ali Delavari to develop aconveniencestorewithgassalesonthissite:
1. A variance to build a major motor fuel station closer than 350 feet to aresidentially- plannedpropertyline.
2. A conditional use permit (CUP) to build a fuel station and car wash.
Mr. Delavari later lost in court in an attempt to overturn the council's action.
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: M -1
Zoning: M -1
Code Requirements
Section 36- 187 {b} states that no building or exterior use, except parking, p p g y be erected, alteredorconductedwithin350feetofaresidentialdistrictwithoutaCUP.
Section 36- 28(c)(6)(a) requires that buildings have at least a 30 foot setback from streetright -of -way.
Section 36- (c)(5)(a) requires that parking lots have at least a 15 foot setback from streetright -of -way.
h
Criteria for Variance Approval
State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a vzoningcode: g pp variance from the
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances uni to thepropertyunderconsideration.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
Undue hardship ", as used in granting of a variance, means the ro ert in questionppYqon cannot be
put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of thelandownerisduetocircumstancesuniquetohisproperty,' not created b ty he landowner, and thevariance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerationsderationsaloneshallnotconstituteanunduehardshipifreasonableuseforthepropertyexistsunderthetermsoftheordinance.
Criteria for CUP Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may grant a CUP, subject to the nine standards forapproval. Refer to the resolution on pages 16 -17.
Application Date
We received this application on March 15, 2000. State law requires that the city takeqy actionwithin60daysofreceivingcompleteapplicationsforaproposal. City ouncil action is
on this proposal b M 15 2000.
Y requiredYY ,
p:sec4lfo rest. cup
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Building Elevation Reductions
5. Variance Request Letter dated March 16, 2000
6. Conditional Use Permit Letter dated March 20, 2000
7. Variance Resolution
8. CUP Resolution
9. Building Elevations date - stamped March 15, 2000 (separate attachments
Attachment 1
VADN#4JS HEIGHTS
o .
3 4.
2.
2. CWNIRIMEW CIR. S
BEAM AVE. •
3. 4. LYDIA srCT. &
BEAM
0
o
z
Gervis
W Lake
J
art
RESr DR!
LE OR
V DR
Sa
Kohlmon
W
N
OHLMAN AVE.
COUNTY ROAD t^ C
W to
pgr
SK
T j
Z
1po V. N W
0s
ONNOR C AVE•vA
r. pF,pt AVE.
11
o
W
a
v
AVE.
TANT 2
GERMS AVE, S GERVIUS
GRANDVIEW AVE.
VIKING DR.
SNERREN AVE.Knucc° J'
COPE L
J
LARK CT.
AVE.
VIKING DR. KeLake J .
v •, CO. < RD. N LAURIE RD. sni
o LELAND RD. t SAN URSTLAURIECT. at z W
vs a / JUNCTION AVE. 6 w
eUR$X G7. c a elJ
6URKE AV AVE. m BURKE AVE.
cHeERS sT o t
io ELDRIDGE AV Q , ELDR IDGE AVE.
0 .
6ELMOIYT AVE.
W oke BELMONTN (
H GORSE n ,VE.
GO SKILL AV E. SKILL DAMN AVE.I SKILLMAN AV.
KENW OOD KOO
LOCATION MAP
9
4
N
0
8
W Mof
t
U
Attachment 2
r
O
N
W , •
2)
4
94 a c c PT . IZA t M
I -Q BsANGUSMEATSgO
IV
p
0 /2694t - - ,47 )
JIC C' I
0
Q TIMBER .ro
as .. :mo a
M. Q' & TURF .: mass * p .:_7 "•
NORTH STAR
Ole
3oe.3 75 AUTO BODY &
STANDARD
7
ACrO
Rl
No AcceK
TYR AD
Cos
1122
cogN o
Y.
Q
O
r
r
J
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
ffil
4
N
1 v Y A
PROPOSED ELECTRIC
SITE • , :S
Ito
4v 0
O 76
L
yy
1
L
Attachment 3
r
1
o
O r
4? t
wOS '
to
4 sw !
3 M4
1
0% •
I S
PROPOSED N
OFFiC
MANUFACTURING
o8, 4 OCR GSF
4 o hsit
31 -
r • • saw ow .
1"S ,`
y° SOD •
CMM
iM N k •r t u
TY R •
SITE PLAN 4
N
Z;4JJaU4-)a
waao
AC
A
OUST
coutc
CMM
INA04
1000 /
AQA
rm -
rteVXM
fAc
EAST
ELEVATION
SOUTH
ELEVATION
NORTH
ELEVATION
MonN10111!
0
am
IACW
@to=
PPMI
O
lcom -
I
M
F
nMou
1 •
nx
Lnu
U
w • _ •
1 • • • .
t •
UCC
01
r;
a-
Ii^
0
c
c,.
j
Ns
f4
q
C
UO..LAJ
W
i
609%
000SITE
PLIWREVIEWSUBMITTALMm
M
OAST
now
ploa
W.
K •
H
X00
114A
2
OHM
a
WEST
ELEVATION
03/16/60 15:56 FA 6124737058 _ S DEVELOPMENT INC. 19062
Attachment 5
Steiner__ -
Develor)mient, I
3610 County Road 101
Wayzata, MN . 5.5391 -
612) 473 -5650 Fax 473 -7058
March 1 G, 2000
f om Fkstrand
Associate Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 Colmty Road B Fast
Maplewood MN 5 5109
Re: Forest Products Variance
Dear Torn
In conjunction with the Site Plan review process we are requesting set back variances for the Forest Products project.
The need for a variance, is unique to the size shape and location of the slue. The site totals 44,019 SF but duc to
roadway easements only 33,708 SF in a triangular shape is suitable to be built on. In addition the triangular site is
isolated from surrounding buildings and neighbors by Highway 61 on the west and north, Maplewood Drive on the east
and County Road C on the south.
The 8 S'~ proposed office warehouse building hu a relatively low FAR (Floor Area Ratio) of 19% compared to
normal metro area standards of 30 %. Even this relative small building wicb it's parking requirements of 14 spaces does
not fit on the site without encroaching into the btdlding and parking setbacks.
It was determined with stair that the most benign encroachment would be on the Highway 61 — west boundary. This
encroachment does not impact any neighboring buildings and is mitigated by the large right of way with in the Highway
61 corridor. Plus encroachment varies from 10 — 22 FT into the 30 FT setback, while still providing approximately a 70
FT sct buck from the Highway 61 east edge.
Tn addition on the east property Bile there is an approximate 70 SF (.04% of the total parking area) parking area
encroachment into the 15 FT parking setback. This encroach=nt allows two parking .spaces to have the proper
dimensions.
The variances do not alter the charactcr of the site or neighborhood do to the unique free standard nature of the site
combined with relatively minima encroachments,
We appreciate your cooperaTion on this matter.
Sincerely,
ST'EINER DEVELO +VIEN'r
F eriG Richter
ice President
13
0/20/00 15:30 FAX 6124737058 STEINER DEVELOPMENT INC. Ig'002 /002r
w
y ~ N
1
eit ner - ..r 1'1• • i. r :•
1
i
De
3610 County Hand i0i
Wayzata M 55 391
612) 473 -5650 FEIx 473 - 7058
March 20, 2000
Tom Lkstrand
Associate Manner
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood MN 55109
Attachment 6
MAR 2 0 A100
Re: Forest Products Conditional Use Permit
Dear Tom:
In conjunction with the Site Plan review process we are requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the Forest hroductqProject,
The site is zoned M - Light Industrial but do to residential within 350 feet a Conditional Use Fel - Init is required. The
surrounding residential is separated to the east by Maplewood Drive and a 10 Sly out greentIotgr area.
The 8,400 SF proposed office warehouse building has a rclativcly low FAR (Floor Area Ratio) of 19% and this relative
small buildutg with it's parking requiremeuts of 14 spaces should meet the criteria of approval of a Conditional Usehermit.
It was determined with sta :T that the proposed wilding does meet the City's comprehensive plan, it will not change thecharacterofthesurroundingareaandtheprojectshouldvalues.
g
im property
Forrest Products will operate a wood working shop, which will have Iimited retail customers in the ran a of one to fourcustomersperhour. Service vehicles will be panel /flat bed trucks that should
g
p d average one trip a day The ptvnary usewillbeawoodworkingshop, wood storage slid show room space. This use will not be hazardous, a nuisance createexcessivepollutionorbeunsightly. '
Sitc access is to be lirrmitcd to one curb cut on Maplewood Drive that should provide minmi al traffic on local streets andwillnotcreatetrafficcongestionorunsafeconditions. The site plan indicates substantial landscaping around thebuildingandaneffortwillbemadetosavethelaerexistingtreesonthe
P S
g property -lines and in the existing road right ofway.
The proposed project etYiciently utilizes existing city services and does not create any additional public costs,
We appreciate your cooperation on this matter.
Sincerely,
S RD VELOPIM ENT, INC.
rederick RicfltCr
Vice President
14
Attachment 7
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Conrad Solberg, of Forest Products, applied for a 22 -foot building setback
variance to build a cabinet -shop building eight feet from the Highway 61 right -of -way and a
seven -foot parking lot setback variance to build a corner of a parking lot eight feet from the
frontage road right -of -way.
WHEREAS, these variances apply to the undeveloped property at the northeast comer of
Highway 61 and County Road C. The legal description is:
THE EAST 150 FEET OF THE WEST 394.54 FEET OF THE SOUTH 316.30 FEET OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29,
RANGE 22; ALSO THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 349.31 FEET OF THE WEST 199.54 FEET
AT SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 LYING
EASTERLY OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF WHITE BEAR LAKE ROAD.
WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c)(5 and 6) requires that buildings be set back 30 feet from street
right -of -way and that parking lots be set back 15 feet from street right -of -way.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing that their building have an eight foot setback and that
their parking lot also have an eight foot setback at one point.
WHEREAS, this requires variances of 22 feet and seven feet.
WHEREAS, the history of these variances is as follows:
1. On April 11, 2000, the community design review board recommended that the city council
approve these variances and on April 17, 2000 the planning commission recommended
the same.
2. The city council held a public hearing on May 8, 2000. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by
law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present
written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the
city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
variances since:
1. Compliance with the code would cause the developer undue hardship because of the
unusual triangular- shaped lot. The lot shape makes it difficult to meet setback
requirements because of its tapered shape.
2. Approval of the building setback variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the ordinance because of the wide highway boulevard.
3. Approval of the parking lot setback variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent
of the ordinance because only a point of the parking lot would encroach into the setback
area.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on May 8, 2000.
15
Attachment 8
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Conrad Solberg, of Forest Products, applied for a conditional use permit to
construct a building closer than 350 feet to property zoned for residential.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the undeveloped property at the northeast corner of
Highway 61 and County Road C. The legal description is:
THE EAST 150 FEET OF THE WEST 394.54 FEET OF THE SOUTH 316.30 FEET OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29,
RANGE 22; ALSO THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 349.31 FEET OF THE WEST 199.54 FEET
AT SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 LYING
EASTERLY OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF WHITE BEAR LAKE ROAD.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On April 17, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
the conditional use permit for the proposed building placement.
2. The city council held a public hearing on May 8, 2000. City staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present. written statements.
The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
16
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The city shall not allow a lot division to occur that would separate the 40 -foot -wide portion
of this site from the main part unless the shoreland ordinance would continue to be met.
5. Work should not be done with the doors open. If the dust collector system by the dock
causes excessive noise, the property owner should take steps to provide sound
dampening.
6. There shall not be any outdoor storage unless the city council approves a conditional use
permit for outdoor storage.
The Maplewood City Council approved. this resolution on May 8, 2000.
17
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
APRIL 11 2000
VI. DESIGN REVIEW
A. Forest Products, Northeast Corner of Highway 61 and County Road C Conrad Solberg of
Forest Products
Secretary Tom Ekstrand presented the staff report. He thought switching the three Black Hills
Spruce trees from the southwest corner of the building with the nine Japanese Red Spirea at
the southeast corner would be a benefit because once they start filling in they would screen
the site from the homes in the area.
Conrad Solberg, the applicant, had no problem with the recommendations that were made by
staff. David Distad, vice president of Steiner Development, showed the color scheme
proposed for the building. He said it will be a scored and rock -face building in a brown tone
with brown on the stripe and the decorative portion. Mr. Distad showed photographs of
several buildings in the area which are similar in material to the looks of this building. He said
the cedar shakes are treated with a material that keeps them "new looking" for about three
years.
Chairperson Ledvina agreed with Mr. Ekstrand's recommendation for changing the location of
the evergreen trees. He was concerned about the maintenance of the oil- skimming device at
the outlet of the holding pond. Mr. Ekstrand agreed that a condition should be added for this
maintenance. Boardmember Shankar asked if the building could be smaller to meet the
setback from Highway 61. Mr. Ekstrand said this was discussed and the applicant felt they
needed this size facility for the function of their business.
Boardmember Shankar had a problem with adding a canopy with wood shakes to a block
building. He didn't think the two materials were compatible. Mr.: Shankar said he would "let it
pass" because it was on the northeast corner. The lighting plan is required because it was
not provided prior to this meeting. Mr. Solberg said they checked the turn radius for access to
the overhead door and felt it was workable.
Boardmember LaCasse moved the Community Design Review Board approve:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a 22 -foot building setback variance from the
Highway 61 right -of -way and a seven -foot parking lot setback variance from the frontage
road right -of -way. The code requires 30 feet and 15 feet. These variances are based on
the following findings:
1. Compliance with the code would cause the developer undue hardship because of the
unusual triangular - shaped lot. The lot shape makes it difficult to meet setback
requirements because of its tapered shape.
2. Approval of the building setback variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent
of the ordinance because of the wide highway boulevard.
3. Approval of the parking lot setback variance would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the ordinance because only a point of the parking lot would encroach into the
setback area.
Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes of 04 -11 -00
C. Approve the plans date - stamped March 15, 2000 for the proposed Forest Products
cabinet shop at the northeast corner of Highway 61 and County Road C. The owner shall
do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit:
a. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. An oil skimming device shall
be included at the outlet of the holding pond and maintained at a frequency
determined by staff.
b. Revised plans showing:
1) A handicap- parking space that is eight feet wide with an adjacent eight -foot-
wide loading space.
2) Switching the three Black Hills Spruce at the southwest corner of the building
with the nine Japanese Red Spirea at the southeast corner of the site.
3) A site lighting plan showing the light spread and fixture design. The light
fixtures must have concealed lenses and bulbs to properly shield glare from
the residents.
3. Complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
b. Install a handicap - parking sign for the handicap - parking space.
c. Paint all rooftop mechanical equipment, stacks and vents to match the uppermost
part of the building. Roof -top equipment must be screened from view from the
homes to the south and east if the roof design does not provide adequate
screening.
d. Install and maintain an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas.
e. Stripe all customer parking spaces at a width of 9 % feet and the employee
spaces at nine feet.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any
unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in
Community Design Review Board -3-
Minutes of 04 -11 -00
the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in
the spring or summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished
work.
5. Signs are not part of this approval. The applicant shall apply for sign permits with
staff.
6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Boardmember Shankar seconded. Ayes all
The motion passed.
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, APRIL 17, 2000
V. NEW BUSINESS
C. Forest Products: Setback Variances and Conditional Use Permit
Ken Roberts, associate planner, summarized the staff report. He then answered questions
from the commission. Mike Miller was present representing the applicant. He said the noise
from the dust collection system was no louder than the traffic on the highway. Commissioner
Rossbach thought this was not good and the collection system should be on the same side of
the building as the freeway if it was that loud. He suggested repositioning the unit to the other
side of the building at this time rather than adding dampers later if the noise level is too loud.
Mr. Rossbach said the neighbors should not be imposed upon by this noise. He also pointed
out that the proposed lighting did not meet the code. Mr. Roberts said the lighting was reviewed
by the community design review board.
Mr. Miller said the business makes cabinets, furniture, etc. and sells lumber. There will be a
small showroom for customers. Commissioner Rossbach felt this was "100 percent better than
the last proposal for this site" and he supported approval.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a 22 -foot building setback variance from the
Highway 61 right -of -way and a seven -foot parking lot setback variance from the frontage
road right -of -way. The code requires 30 feet and 15 feet. These variances are based on the
following findings:
1. Compliance with the code would cause the developer undue hardship because of the
unusual triangular- shaped lot. The lot shape makes it difficult to meet setback
requirements because of its tapered shape.
2. Approval of the building setback variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the ordinance because of the wide highway boulevard.
3. Approval of the parking lot setback variance would in keeping with the spirit and intent
of the ordinance because only a point of the parking lot would encroach into the setback
area.
B. Adopt the resolution on pages 16 -17 approving a conditional use permit to build a cabinet
shop that would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district at the northeast corner of
Highway 61 and County Road C. Approval is based on the findings required by the
ordinance and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 04 -17 -2000
40 The city shall not allow a lot division to occur that would separate the 40- foot -wide
portion of this site from the main part unless the shoreland ordinance would continue to
be met.
5. Work should. not be done with the doors open. If the dust collector system by the dock
causes excessive noise, the property owner should take steps to provide sound
dampening.
6. There shall not be any outdoor storage unless the city council approves a conditional use
permit for outdoor storage.
Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes -all
The motion passed.
City of Maplewood
Official Sign -Up Sheet
By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the
Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes.
Name (first &last) - please print Address
1. /'7K/r "jftrOfi !'74' .qbd -Gfr ,Sj
2.
0"0
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
AGENDA ITEM NO n
opt by Council
MEMORANDUM
Date
TO: City Manager Endorsed
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Modified
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Design Review — Fresh Paint Rejected
LOCATION: 1055 Gervais Avenue
DATE: April 18, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Mr. Thomas Schaffhausen, of Sanas Capital Investments, is proposing to build a 5,300 square -
foot office /warehouse facility at 1055 Gervais Avenue. Refer to the maps and drawings on pages
9 -12 and 14 -16. Mr. Schaffhausen has submitted a narrative explaining this proposal. Refer to
the letter on page 13.
This facility would consist of a building for Fresh Paint, a commercial painting contractor. This
building would have office and storage space and a garage for the indoor storage of company
equipment and vehicles. Refer to the enclosed project plans (separate attachment). The proposed
building would have an exterior of prefinished horizontal steel siding, brick, steel doors, windows
for the offices and standing -seam roof panels.
Requests
1. Approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) because the proposed building would be about 64
feet from the residential property to the rear (north). Code requires a CUP for buildings in an
M -1 (light manufacturing) district that would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district.
2. Approval of building design, site and landscape plans.
DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit
Mr. Schaffhausen wants the city to allow him to keep the existing house on the property for an
employee to live in as a site caretaker. Section 36- 151(x)(1) of the city code says "A dwelling unit
for One family in combination with a business use" is a permitted use in this zoning district.
However, there is some question about the city's intention by adopting this code. That is, did the
city intend the dwelling unit to be in or connected to the business building or did the city intend for
the dwelling unit to just be on the same property as the business? It is staffs interpretation that
the city did not intend the code to allow an existing single family home to remain when there is new
development. However, the applicant and his attorney believe that one could interpret the
ordinance to mean that the residence and a business use on a property are permitted as long as
there is connection between the residents and the business. (See the letter from Thomas Hart
starting on page 18.) It would be possible for the applicant to include living quarters in the new
building, if they so choose.
This development proposal gives the city an opportunity to change a nonconforming land use (the
single dwelling and garage) to a commercial property that fits the standards and policies of the
zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. As such, the city should require the property owner to
remove the house and the garage from the site before building the new office /warehouse.
Having a new office /warehouse on this site would meet the requirements for a CUP. This project
should have little effect on the adjacent single - family homes to the north due to the 64 -foot setback
to the building and the existing vegetation south of the existing houses. This facility also would
screen and buffer the houses from the businesses on the south side of Gervais Avenue.
The proposal would be compatible with the existing single - family homes to the north and the
warehouses across Gervais Avenue and should not cause any problems for the city or for the
neighbors. Staff does not have any concern with this proposal and operation. Traffic should only
increase slightly over its present level. As for the effect on property values, city staff cannot make
the determination that there would be any negative impact on property values with this request.
Building Design
The proposed building would be attractive. The project architect told me they have not yet picked
the building colors,* but expects that they will be neutral and attractive.. It also should be noted the
Building Official will require the new building to meet all code requirements including the
requirements of Chapter 1306 about building sprinklering.
Landscaping and Screening
There are trees on the north side of the site that would provide screening between the existing
houses and the proposed building. It would be advantageous to preserve these trees for screening
purposes if the grading limits allow. The applicant proposes to leave some of the existing trees on
the site, but proposes to add several new trees around the site and landscaping in front of the new
building.
The city code requires that the applicant replace quality trees that are eight inches or more in
caliper. Poor - quality trees such as box elders, cottonwoods and poplar are exempt. The code
requires that these trees be replaced up to a density of 10 trees per acre.
The property to the west of this site has an occupied single - dwelling. Because of this house, there
is a need for screening on the west side of the proposed parking lot between the proposed building
and the existing house. This screening is necessary because Sections 36- 27(b)(1) and (4) of the
code require screening where:
The light from vehicle headlights and other sources would be directed into residential windows
A parking lot is constructed next to a property that is used or shown on the city's land use plan
for single or double - dwelling use.
This screening must be at least 80 percent opaque and at least six feet tall. The screening
requirement may be met with a berm, a fence, plantings or a combination of design and materials.
The community design review board (CDRB) should review this plan before the city approves a
building permit for the project.
The city code also requires in- ground lawn irrigation. The applicant should provide this in the front
and on the sides of the new building and around all sides of the existing house.
Parking
The proposed site plan shows 13 parking spaces. Based on the proposed use of the building,
these should adequately serve their needs. In the event a shortage develops, however, the city
could require that the applicant add more spaces on the west side of the driveway.
2
Drainage Considerations
The. applicant's plans show much of the site being graded to create the building pad, the driveway
and the parking area. The proposed grading plan shows the storm water running off the parking lot
to Gervais Avenue and possibly the loss of an infiltration area on the northwest corner of the site.
Because of the proposed grades, the city engineer is suggesting that the developer direct all
impervious surfaces (roofs, driveway and parking areas) to the south and into a storm sewer that
they connect to the existing city system to the west of the site. The final plans for the storm sewer
and utilities will be reviewed by and subject to the city engineer's approval upon building permit
submittal.
COMMISSION ACTIONS
On April 11,' -2000, the community design review board recommended approval of the design plans
for this project. They also recommended that the applicant change the site plan to move the new
building closer to the street if the city council requires the removal of the house.
On April 17, 2000, the planning commission made two recommendations about this request. The
first was that the existing house should stay on the property and the second was for approval of
the conditional use permit for the new office /warehouse building.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 21 and 22. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for
Thomas Schaffhausen of Sanas Capital Investments to construct an office /warehouse building
on the property at 1055 Gervais Avenue. This request needs this permit because the new
building would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district. The city bases the approval on
the findings required by code and is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city date - stamped
January 20, 2000, except that the owner shall remove the existing house and garage from
the site.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The city council may require additional parking in the future if the council determines that
there is a need for additional parking on the site.
5. There shall be no outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, materials or supplies, except the
personal vehicles of the employees, permitted on the site.
6. Except in the event of a bona fide emergency, the applicant's commercial traffic and
vehicles shall use Gervais Avenue and the Highway 61 frontage road for access to this
site. The applicant or owner shall use all reasonable efforts to insure that commercial
vehicles under its control do not use Cypress Street for access to or from this site.
3
7. The normal hours of operation shall be from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday,
although the foregoing shall not prohibit employees or representatives of the applicant,
owner, or its tenants from being on the site outside the foregoing hours. Such activities and
site visits shall be conducted in a manner to avoid unnecessary noise and shall not cause
a nuisance to the nearby residential properties.
8. The lighting on the site shall be wall or post- mounted and shall shine toward the site.
9. Clean the site by removing all vehicles, unused and inoperable equipment, debris and all
other unused /unusable items.
10. If the city council allows the house to stay on the property, then the occupants of the house
shall have a direct business connection with the business on the site. In addition, the
house shall not be rented to or sold to any person or party that does not have a direct
business relationship with the business on' the property.
B. Approve the project plans date - stamped January 20, 2000, for the Fresh Paint facility at 1055
Gervais Avenue, based on the findings required by the code. The property owner or applicant
shall:
1 Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Before the city issues a building permit for the new office /warehouse, complete the
following:
a. Have the community design review board (CDRB) approve a screening plan for the
area on the west side of the proposed parking lot between the proposed building and
the existing house. This screening must be at least 80 percent opaque and at least six
feet tall. The screening requirement may be met with a berm, a fence, plantings or a
combination of design and materials.
b. Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for
approval. The erosion control plan shall meet all ordinance requirements. The grading
and storm water plans shall direct all impervious surfaces (roofs, driveway and parking
areas) to the south and into a storm sewer that the developer connects to the existing
city system to the west of the site.
c. Submit a building -color scheme of neutral colors to city staff for approval.
d. Get a demolition permit from the city and remove the existing garage and house. If the
city council allows the house to stay on the site, then get a demolition permit for the
garage.
e. Submit a lighting plan as required by the code showing the light spread and fixture
design for site lights. The light fixtures must have concealed lenses and bulbs to
properly shield glare from the residents.
3. Complete the following before occupying the new office /warehouse building:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
4
b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. Restore and seed or sod any and all disturbed
ground such as the areas of driveway or blacktop removal. Remove all old driveway
entrances and restore with sod.
c. Provide handicap - accessible parking spaces as the ADA (Americans with Disabilities
Act) requires. Install a handicap - parking sign for each handicap- parking space.
d. Screen all roof- mounted equipment visible from adjacent residential properties. Such
equipment visible on non - residential sides must be painted to match the building color.
code requirement)
e. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure if there will be any outdoor storage of refuse.
The enclosure must match the building in color and materials and shall have a
closeable gate that is 100 percent opaque.
f. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all lawn areas on the front and on the sides of
the new office /warehouse building and on all sides of the existing house.
g. Provide site - security lighting as required by the city code. The light source, including
the lens covering the bulb, shall be concealed or shielded so not to cause any nuisance
to vehicle drivers or to adjacent property owners. There shall be no lighting on the
back of the building unless required by the building code.
h. Post the west side of the new driveway and the west side of the parking area for "no
parking."
L Install continuous concrete curb and gutter around all parking areas and the driveway.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives cash escrow for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent
of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by
June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy
if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
6. If the city council requires removal of the house through the CUP process, the applicant
shall resubmit a revised site plan to the community design review board for approval.
5
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
We had sent surveys to the 23 property owners within 350 feet of this site. We received fourreplies.
1. I have no problem with (this). (Northernaire Motel, Inc.)
2. Absolutely not! We don't know what would go there in the future. Too much trucks in area andnoisenow. Do not want paint and truck fumes, either. (Karl - 1008 Sextant Avenue)
3. Absolutely no! This firm originally stated intended use was officeffice only in existing building. Nowtheywanttoaddabuildingthatwilladdtothetruckandnoiseandtrafficthatisalreadytooloudinthearea. No way - do not let them expand into a truck and equipment stor ' '2440 C ress age facility.Karl Cypress Street)
4. See the letter dated January 24, 2000 from Sherrill aBenjaminon e 17.1 page
CON
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 0.99 acres
Existing land use: A single - family home and detached garage
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Single dwellings
South: Businesses across Gervais Avenue
West: A single dwelling that the city has zoned and planned M -1 (light manufacturing)
East: Undeveloped property and Sunset Realty
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: M -1 (light manufacturing)
Zoning: M -1
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36- 187(b) states that no building or exterior use, except parking, may be erected, altered
or constructed within 350 feet of a residential district without a CUP.
Section 36- 151(b)(4) requires a CUP for the outdoor storage or display of goods or materials. The
city may require screening of such uses provided at least 80 percent of materials are screened.
Section 36 -22(a) requires one parking space for every , 200 square feet of office space and one
parking space for every 1,000 square feet of warehouse space.
Findings for Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council must base approval of a CUP on nine standards for
approval. Refer to the resolution on pages 21 and 22 for the findings.
Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the community design review board make the following
findings to approve plans:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring,
existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of
investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the
use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not
create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of
the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive
development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan.
7
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good
composition, materials, textures and colors.
Application Date
The city received the application materials for this request on January 20, 2000. State law requires
the city to take action on this request by March 19, 2000, unless the applicant agrees to a time
extension. On February 22, 2000, the city received a request from the applicant's attorney to delay
the city's review of the proposal. On April 5, 2000, we received a request from the applicant's
attorney to again consider these applications.
p:sec9 \freshpnt.mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Grading, Utility and Landscape Plans
5. Applicant's Letter dated 1 -19 -00
6. Building Elevation Reductions
7. Building Elevation Reductions
8. Building Floor Plan
9. 1 -24 -00 letter from Sherrill Benjamin
10. 4 -5 -00 letter from Thomas Hart
11. CUP Resolution (2 pages)
12. Project Plans date- stamped January 20, 2000 (separate attachment)
0
Attachment 1
4.
tt 1 2.
KAM AVE.
0 t;K Cy
0
oQ 8
Zv W
o- Kuhlman
Gervis
Lij lake
eke
v
v v
COUNTY
2 t DR PALM j / K
3 Bf1.LECREST OR
4 DFitIMUE OR CT.PSMERIDIANOR cc S
CONNOR C tpVE.3
ROAD
7. flEMpTCCJ a
uO BR
Cr c
Y.
ANT AVE.
a
4
AM r w
J 1. SUMMIT CT.
2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR.
3. DULUTH CT.
4. LYDIA AVE.
BEAM
AVE GERVAIS
v GRANDVIEW A
VIKING D
o SHERREN AVE.
v
K+
Q COP COPE j
CT .LARK 0 AVE.VIKING DR. Keller i
o w % CO. RD. v -
z
LAURIE RD.
1 J w g LAURIE CT. : i c L.EtAND R0. c ?
W
SAND URST
CC. 0
p to o. W +/ >- JUNCTION AVE. w
z
z
g
BURKE CT. A Tkrb.r a ev , 2
600BURKE BURKE AVE.V
sorest RKE AVE. M
Park (1) CHAMBERS ST C 1
Z ELDRIDGE AV
v
EL.DR IO DGE AVE.
tJehrlane 'o
CLoBELMO OURSE AVE. BELMONT AVE.
0 L e N
i GOL SKILL AV E. SKILL MSKIL.LMAN AV. KE 1g AN AVE.
KENW OOD SHE .
Z) Robinood
oo R AN AV.
w Trail -- m
t;
FROST
cpwZ }- t
FR VI $
BELLWOOD AVE. a 4•' IFS '"
LOCATION MAP
9
4
N
0
o 8
v W
v v
KOHL MAN AVE.
V
ROAD C
T A
Cr c
o
Cr w
NOR
AVE.c
BROOKS
o HSEXGERVAlSAVEGERVAIS
v GRANDVIEW A
VIKING D
o SHERREN AVE.
v
K+
Q COP COPE j
CT .LARK 0 AVE.VIKING DR. Keller i
o w % CO. RD. v -
z
LAURIE RD.
1 J w g LAURIE CT. : i c L.EtAND R0. c ?
W
SAND URST
CC. 0
p to o. W +/ >- JUNCTION AVE. w
z
z
g
BURKE CT. A Tkrb.r a ev , 2
600BURKE BURKE AVE.V
sorest RKE AVE. M
Park (1) CHAMBERS ST C 1
Z ELDRIDGE AV
v
EL.DR IO DGE AVE.
tJehrlane 'o
CLoBELMO OURSE AVE. BELMONT AVE.
0 L e N
i GOL SKILL AV E. SKILL MSKIL.LMAN AV. KE 1g AN AVE.
KENW OOD SHE .
Z) Robinood
oo R AN AV.
w Trail -- m
t;
FROST
cpwZ }- t
FR VI $
BELLWOOD AVE. a 4•' IFS '"
LOCATION MAP
9
4
N
Attachment 2
t L EA
0 85 •Sl .. C)
9. 4
75 3) o ow. 5 ,
ia- •
136-50 Al 1.50 ac. 02 03e3
6
3 ,.• a . Cat • { b
41 b 3 SL+ (4y) N a*
m 134. '••• 132.87 13G•.5o .5o i 6 3.00ac.
1 304) • f ° T 2 _ 2
X
1 132.¢ aG750
e o $ 3
40 CG3 73j 751
7 Z 132-57 t . so •
o Cte) 0 01.1. 9 0 . (n q G
r (' 45cti) • 2.08
b7E.
60 2.47 ,,j3G.S0 7 50 136.TA 02
al)IQ 0
S7 i
W \
z OW43z• T to . o 3G o
o
t„ -T,antr MINI - STORAGE
J 1 ° C- ° ° -- 2481 m 2474 (. 8 ac )
it -No U 134-50 834.50
tz g 0 - 24732472 ° .2466
C7
9 9 a c 2 .19 arc.
HERMANSON DENTAL N •
8) • 1065 108'
feel LJ O
1055
c o
e
u
I
r
1
a _
HIGHWAY 36
o
I I
o' /N
5 9 P•P
o l6i
IN
T
V
do
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
v
Lo
6os.7 u
o ~may • O
00 '
N s.
INn ' w.
M 110
4
N
10
211. L 2 s.78 ti rat,-C
2 (
61)
x.30
AVE _
1
00
q 2458
T2.T a
t G,.
O O
N
N o • >
N ahMOTELr i o`?Y•s
a3 ~
o
z a a ()
j
i3f, • ,o ,••
448
J t 06)
A : ,'r.-6 j ,2C+j Q' O
2440
v
SUNSET h
a io.1041 •:. - _•1055 8t / ti
POND REALTY,ti
a •y I•
9 9 a c 2 .19 arc.
HERMANSON DENTAL N •
8) • 1065 108'
feel LJ O
1055
c o
e
u
I
r
1
a _
HIGHWAY 36
o
I I
o' /N
5 9 P•P
o l6i
IN
T
V
do
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
v
Lo
6os.7 u
o ~may • O
00 '
N s.
INn ' w.
M 110
4
N
10
Attachment 3
F
Vid
u
50ZpW< ip
C2:
i.! a! w
HU
HIP
erg
t
J
b c
O' o
m m
O. .ar.
D
O
m
cc
G
0
3
m.
ic
1— a
O Z 2
m . %
3 m' >
bL a) N
Q
a O
3W0
Z
SITE PLAN
CX to
Q
11
4
N
RI
r
L'L 15TGr I •
1 I f • ° V
4
u
Q
C:•lAC A1NUE.
Attachment 4
i. • . • rte• • • i • •'• • • • • r•Y• . •
ra•
ttrrirc YVf 1'
t • • ` ilk 1i
i
L
i •%
I i
I • • , ,' " MU1 M11D J ,r
J PROPO Eb ILDWG
066.6 k' fFE • _ $$3.00 'r s ••"a
fliz
a
I
t K S - -. •. r • T
t £ - . *T ' si ; ..i s -{••
li''
I
Vr
r v. is + .7••'` •=astts'i:'
J ' f '' - > A X7 ice:
1
EttY.7..; + • fr'`= Y' -Y ; -` .'r if:6.:3 8f!lawN =K
EXAM. 64 /
NET TAP WM EWW r M
DIM or a AND sort. ucsraW st11MI
wo ttr taasym PWAMM S[CWK
W4 k tM
GER AVEN
4g
GRADING & UTILITY PLAN
C1
UTILITY NOTES
1 — AA services tv extond to a point S' Mom propased. bw1dinq.
1 — Verily o• service loee6w. and inverts with nwdxmkd trginser befom co
AN watemmin to hove o rk inwm of 7.51 of tow.
GRADING NOTES
Q — An eMvm oas s hmn we to row urloets.
Contro0or Is nwporwta{e for obtawAnq it nseassory, a Notional Pvfutant Div_-S ge ErinMnvtion
Sysft m (WWS) Cw*,d Storm water Pernit for Cmotnocton Activity before eoeWniatian begins.
r ro. etas
r
es a1
or w arts
r; M li •
wt 'vowd •rf
MtM PAM -"
el:
I
per t.
PROPOSEb S DING
FFE - $66.67 1 FFE - $87.00 !; `C %*A. 1
le
t {.
eA Vt
v"°'R'v.:r7. '- iffif•_'/ i+ ' a'7 s!r7'fi'i!' I
pta ! t4 41i•1
y af. ''i 4.- ''. Saar-•'
as4 - ''. ,,' . iii •
fY ass•. 7tr
T
eke.
I
L. ._._•...._..v._......._......J
GER A
LANOSCMT PLAN
C1
PLANT LIST
PLMM
S on sraftac wig COMW KVM StrFAooT
MIS so MredN A mer Mosw Son h M
IN C wwMq ft o it /tot
TREES
s ±eQl• on sat x w "MW as s+tw:aooT
wr AN rlElrMll
COM- hmc
At d ll**S't •
w r+tsrsre wet trwvoar 11f 19 S s Ask t/Y 46 •
a we rwerale 9w"--2 — t/7'BAD
MC 1tlnus 1rmv box Ch"1 — 1/r t •
a wr. '> sww•o w"owM/ Ors t - 1/T e •
sl Gwalo t vlaow4w. bt w4k Nf*W r Irrtelweul 1 — t/?' f t •
I hwvby ar* that this plan was prspored byrleorundermyicedslpwvlslonandthat1
ant a d o lkrnwd ftkwow En,;n wr #Aift
tM tsws d the SkM d UMntsets.
Na111s It f No.
GRADING, UTILITY AND LANDSCAPE PLANS
12
t
Attachment 5
SANAS CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC
850 Hemline Ave.
SL Paul, MN 55104
January 19, 2000
City of Maplewood
Community Development
Attn: Kenneth Roberts
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
R E C
JAN 10 2000
swim 00"6040 go-am 00 dftl
On behalf of Sanas Capital Investments, I am requesting your consideration in issuing a
conditional use permit to allow us to construct up to a 6,000 sq ft building on the
commercially zoned lot located at 1055 Gervais Ave. The building will be leased to
Fresh Paint, a 15 year old, independently owned commercial painting contractor,
currently located in the Midway area. Fresh Paint employs approximately 35 painters,
and six office employees. On a daily basis, only the six office employees will be
utilizing the building — the remaining staff will be working in the field. The building
will be designed to adequately provide offices and indoor storage for trailers and
equipment. There will be no painting work done at the site.
The building design is both modern and efficient. It's exterior design was carefully
chosen to be attractive, yet unobtrusive. Considerable time was given to the interior to
ensure that it would be a multiple use building in the event of a tenant change, as well as
to allow for growth within the leasing company without further expansion.
I am also requesting your approval to leave the existing house on the property. - Fresh
Paint's top supervisor is currently renting the home, acting as a caretaker of the grounds.
He is prepared to accept the responsibility of acting as caretaker for both buildings and
the grounds, keeping both clean and attractive to the community. We have updated the
home's decorating, and this spring, plan to seal and paint the exterior, replace window
sills and deteriorating wood when the weather permits. Few companies the size of
Fresh Paint are fortunate enough to have a 24 hour security guard/caretaker on site. As a
result, properties can deteriorate, and they can become victim to vandalism. We would
appreciate the ability to avoid such problems.
Thank you for your consideration. I'll be happy to discuss plans in further detail, and
answer any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Thomas R. Sch fliausen
President/CFO
13
p
W7 z o Q LLI
i
SOU
T4
E.
LEVAMQN
n
J
1. - - - -._ .. .. ... _..... __......_.._.. _..._...
n S 3 CD ct I -t
CT1
i
I
liti--- - - - -!
yl '
4 " __ , '
c
In,
rl
w
oo ;
I ,
TAL2 Liol .
I
1
ar
oN
I
r
F1
I -
I
I
I
FRLEZ
Q
i
T
I
lob:
1
t . :
113:_
i
I.,
I4\
1 :
a-.
3
t1
D3
I
1I
5" _.- __...--- - -• --
I(' -
O" ,
1. -
5 `_ ._` -
d __.._.---- .,
t'
3 -
d -
4 `
8' -
d_- - -_ _ . _ - - --
I _ --- .;..
k''' .
1
lit
D
Z-1
Off. , •
Z.
oFFIGc
I
9 ( .
O"
I
91
i
I
r_
1
I ,
P z
I
lot
A - - - - -' - --- - - - -- ::
is
t
b __ ;^
1
G
C"C+n 3 D 0 C W
A
ROU
ND
Fl
ro}Z
FLAN
J
Il
Y .._..... {,
7
F
I
21
1
L
F
4
r - - ---
r _ -,
314,
I,
o.
5
1.
b .
4'
CJ
2'
1
0r::
r-
1999.
C"C+n 3 D 0 C W
Attachment 9
January 24, 2000
Kenneth Roberts, Associate Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 E County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797
RECEV, E
RE: Fresh Paint Office /warehouse Conditional Use Permit -1055 Gervais Avenue
Dear Mr. Roberts:
1 wish to submit comments concerning the noted CUP under consideration by the City of Maplewood.
Originally, I received a letter from Fresh Paint noticing their intent to purchase the property at 1055 Gervais
and offering to answer any questions or concerns. I phoned the number provided and left a message that
would like to talk with them concerning their plan. Not receiving a return call, I placed two additional calls,
leaving messages each time. To Date Fresh Paint has not returned my calls.
Next I spoke with several neighbors and determined that most had not received notice of the pending plans for
1055 Gervais. Lastly, I contacted City Hall by telephone and in person to find out what was occurring and get
information about the company s plans. City staff said they had not applied for a CUP and expressed concern
that Fresh Paint was "getting the cart before the horse" by completing the purchase without knowing if the City
would grant a CUP. To date questions have neither been answered nor has adequate information been
provided.
Questions concerning Fresh Paints use of property at 1055 Gervais;
1. It appears that with the removal of the existing garage, the plans could be altered slightly without
losing effective use of the property, thus moving the building forward and perhaps avoiding the need
for a CUP. Has this issue been addressed?
2. When Fresh Paint refers to trailers and equipment, what does this include?
3. Following up on #3, does Fresh Paint intend to store paints, solvents, thinners, etc. on this property?4. If the answer to #4 is yes, then what types of paints, solvents, thinners, etc., will be stored on this
property, in what quantity, how will waste be disposed and how will the City monitor these materials
and operations?
5. If the answer to #4 is no, then what are the Cities provisions to ensure compliance with no storage of
hazardous or flammable products?
6. The plan reflects a garage with a "flammable waste trap," please explain the need for this and how this
may or may not effect the wet lands in close proximity to this property.
7. The plan reveals a "repair" area, please explain the type, extent, and hours such repairs will be in
progress.
8. The plan reveals stairs leading up between the garage and the storage room, why is that area missing
from the plans provided to neighbors?
9. What is the purpose of this un nown area and how will this unknown area be used?
10. According to the letter provided, Fresh Paint is currently located somewhere in the Midway area. What
is their current address?
11. , Has the City been to the Midway property to find out what kind of residents or neighbors Fresh Paint
currently is for the Midway community?
12. How much traffic, what type and what hours may we expect this traffic in our neighbor?
13. 1 really must repeat City staff's question, why would this company complete the purchase of property
for which they will need a CUP to use as planned before applying for or getting CUP approval?
14. Why do we have City Ordinances if variances and CUP are routinely granted?
Please provide answers to the above questions and notification of the hearing date before approving this
CUP.
Sincer y, ,
1
Sherrill Benjamin
2473 Adele Street
Maplewood, MN 55109
651/481-8708
cc: Mayor and City Council
17
J
FROM WINTHROP WE I NST I NEST PAUL 651 - 292 - 9347 (WED) 4. 5' 00 1 30 /ST 10: 25/NO. 4863010687 P 2
WINTHROP & WEINSTINE Attachment 10
A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
N WIIMMW
RO'98RT X WENSM
3A' 11 DGNCIOM
PSM J. OIBBZffi.1 tt tl t Law
SvIlM AL SMUlAa
nmvcm V. CU N
JC)IiA' W W. J. ARMOUR
DAM S. S==
A HM PIYNAtD I DMFI1i'!'rEL UMMAS A. WAUM 3OW C. EAN
ROM D. CdMDON
srM C- Toum
RFFRBY R ANSM
LAURM A, l4NOCKE 3200 IVitn mota World Tie Cent
JOHN C, HOLF'BR
AL CATMMRM POW=
CHARLES A SCHOENWETTER
KAl=A. AAUErr
J. XNY=LLOYD W. GROCUS 3 Past Seventh 3t =t SMIW a UHR ANXXMW Q TW"M
AdUM C. BMM umm Jo mi=Unt PAW P Ukmewta 55101 Tt"MY A, K40W r. ROGEW
HAW R1JL2Iflt DItOOlm F ADLEY
TeleeP hone 65) 290 -940 ?
AMVWW P- rVex JASONL BROM
DAM P 4N THOMAS IL 9M RYAN K CRAM JMM ANN Fit,
TWMA3 M. xurrIV DANIEL C, arc Pax ( 351 ) 2 -9347 smantsrmmmm RfG= NY0=
DAR -2W_ C. MgUISON ZIC J. NYSTR,M JVLIB & SMYERMAN DARMI. K GRAHAM
XMA.XNW JOANNE L MATZEx 3000 Dain Pwtsdier ft=EF4C F SWANSM ANN I WAUMM
K r. WMANG ATPICK W. WE=
60 South St Sit IAIMA A.Jar : MCCOM
hUMMA D. YAMLANCO'1,1Rr PAUL W. WMWARM CRA1 S. KRUhffMNT DENSE L wonmMm
DAVID & M0M M CRAM A. BRANOr Minneapolis. Mimes= 55402 CaLwUj.mvwR AM NL LOCK
DCNAM J+ BWM JAM M W ECOWN0 Telephame (0 12) 34T -0700 AM D WEMMERG DAM M. MV
JON R UMN g M• MAM Fax (012) 347 -0600 MAmcR PRATAMnr RYAN R URN=
UNWA I. MARM MnU A. CRAM 1W R.frLAh0VWUD
TODD tRTtBSS Wrruim W. MA,M NORMi4,N L, JONES M
M. URNarr 1t T=L. IZCUMC,
ddsmot
DhW Dial Pr to
651) 290 -8481 Swint Paul
April 5, 2000
Mr. Ken Robe
Associate Plannera L
City of Maplewood
1 830 E.County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re:1 055 Gervais Avenue /Application for Condi Use Permit
Deal' Mr. Roberts:
As you know, our office is representing Sanas capital Investrrnents ( "Sanas "), the owner of the property
located at 1055 Gervais Avenue. First of all, we would like to thank you, Pat Kelly, Melinda Coleman
and Chris Cavett for meeting with Tom Schaffhausen and. the undersigned recently to discuss this matter.
Sccond, Sanas would certainly like this matter to be placed on the agendas of the Design Review
Committee, the Planning Commission and the city council at the earliest opportunity.
As you know, Sanas is a partnership, the principals of which are the same two individuals who own Fresh
Paint, Inc., a commercial painting contractor Sams purchased the subject property in September of 1 999
from William and Julia Bedell, who had owned the subj cct property for many years, and who had
constructed the existing single-family residence on the subject property. Although the existing single -
falnily residence is not a large structure, it has certainly been well maintained by Mr. And Mrs. Bedell
over the years. As we have discussed with you, Sams not only intends to maintain the residence in good
condition, but to invest in improvements to the residence. As we have Also discussed with you, current
plans would involve removal of the existing garage serving the single - family residence in order to allow
appropriate access to the conunercial facility.
Prior to purchasi the subject property, Sanas representatives met with you and ether members of the
City's planning staff on more than one occasion for purposes of determining whether the proposed
construction of a commer office facility on the subject property, in tandem with continued use of the
existing singlefamily residence, was consistent with the city's expectations. Bascd not only on these
discussions but also on a review of City ordinances, we understood that existing city ordinances would,
subject to the granting of a conditional use permit, permit the construction of the additional office facility
0
FROM WINTHROP & WEINSTINEST PAUL 651-292 (WED) 4. 5'00 10 P 3
Mr. Ken Roberts
April 5, 2040
Page 2
and continued maintenance of the single - family residence on the site. This proposal was uniquely suited
to the proposed business interests of Sanas and Fresh Paint. Accordingly, it was with some surprise, that
we read your planning memorandum dated February $, 2000, whcrcin it was first suggested that the
single - family residence would have to be removed.
At our recent meeting, Ms. Coleman indicated that this suggestion was originated with the intent of
seeking guidance from the City Council with respect to interpretation of Ordinance Section 36 - 15l. She
further indicated that her ptimaty concern was avoiding a situation wherein the single family residence
was rented to a party unrelated to the business being conducted in the commercial facility.
As Mr. Schaffhausen volunteered at the Meeting, such is not the intent of Sanas an Sanas would have no
objection to inclusion in the conditional use permit of such a restriction, as long as the residential
structure is used for residential purposes.
In fact, we believe such a restriction is consistent with a clear reading of Section 36 -151 which allows as
a permitted use within a business commercial district a "dwelling unit for one family in combination with
a business use". we do not believe that this language requires that a dwelling unit be attached to the
facility in which the business use is located since, if such were the intent, the word "attached" could
easily have been used. The absence of the word "attached" seems compelling. Nevertheless, we do
believe thaat the words "in combinations' require sonic connection between the continued use of the
dwelling unit for residential purposes and the business use.
As you know, current plans are for an employee of Fresh paint to reside in the existing house. This
employee will act inpart as a caretaker of the entire property. It is imperative to Sanas that the house be
regained on the site as Sanas projects growth not only in the business of Fresh Paint but also in the
investment portfolio of Sanas and foresees future use of the residential structure for office purposes in
connection with such businesses.
We believe that the residence and the commercial facility will be complementary., both in use and
appearance. Hopefully, it is fair to say that we all agree that the site allows sufficient room to
accommodate both structures. Allowing the single- family residence to be retained will allow future
expansion of the existing on - site businesses without need for additional office structures. Certainly,
allovring the single - family residence to remain on site will not ha the character of the existin
neighborhood since single - family residences are common in this neighborhood since the neighborhood
has been, is now and will continue to be in mix of both residential and commercial uses. Your planning;
report supporu Sanas' proposed use of the property, indicating that such use "would be compatible with
existing single - fancily homes to the north and the warehouses across Oer'vais Avenue and should not
cause any problems for the City or for the neighbors" and that "staff does not have an concern with this
proposal and operation ". In fact, the only basis under the existing City ordinances for a requirement of
Sanas to seep a conditional use permit for its proposed use i the proximity of the subject property to a
residential district. The only "conditions'' to be applied against the prop should therefore relate to
public health safety and welfare concerns relating to such residences
Jn sumnwy, we believe that this particular proposal will not set an undesirable precedent for the City,
since (f) the business use and the residential use will be Compatible and complementary , and Sanas will
agme to a resection prohibiting rental of the residence for residential purposes to a party =elated to the
19
FROM WINTHROP & WEINSTINEST PAUL 651 - 292 - 9347
Mr. Ken Roberts
April 5, 2000
Page 3
WED) 4. 5'00 10: 31/ST. 10: 25/NO. 4863010687 P 4
business being conducted on site. We do not see any evidence in the plain language of the ordinance
whatsoever that would prohibit retention of the single - family dwelling, and in fact, believe that the clear
language of Scction 36 -151 expressly allows . point residential and business use, with no requirement
whatsoever that the same be attached. Since there do* not appear to be any public health, safety and
welfare considerations affecting the neighbors to the north, we would respectfully ask that the City
Co=cil approve the proposed conditional use permit.
Sanas Capital Investments and Fresh Faint both want to be good neighbors, and to introduce a business to
the City of Maplewood which will be a positive force both in the neighborhood and the City four many
years to come. Wo .look forwm to meeting with the . Design Review Committee, the planning
Conn'nission and the City Council and to, worldng with you and other mernbers of the City staff toward
successful conclusion of this project. We will follow up this letter, as we have discussed, with suggested
langtiagc changes on certain of the other conditions proposed in your planning report. Should you have
any questions regarding any of the forcgoing, please do not hesitate to cell.
Very truly yon,
WIlV=dP & WENS , P.A.
y -
Tho s M. Hart
TMWpg/STPI :529732.3
20
Attachment 11
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Tom Schaffhausen, of Sanas Capital Investments, applied for a conditional use
permit to build an office /warehouse facility in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district closer than 350
feet to a residential district.
is:
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 1055 Gervais Avenue. The legal description
Subject to Bedell Road (Gervais Avenue), the East 150 feet of the South 290 4/10 feet of the
Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, Maplewood, Ramsey
County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On April 17, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this permit.
2. The city council held a public hearing on May 8, 2000. City staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning, -
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to.be in
conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.-
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate Only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures., water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
21
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city date- stamped
January 20, 2000, except that the owner shall remove the existing house and garage from
the site.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The city council may require additional parking in the future if the council determines that
there is a need for additional parking on the site.
5. There shall be no outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, materials or supplies, except the
personal vehicles of the employees, permitted on the site.
6. Except in the event of a bona fide emergency, the applicant's commercial traffic and
vehicles shall use Gervais Avenue and the Highway 61 frontage road for access to this
site. The applicant or owner shall use all reasonable efforts to insure that commercial
vehicles under its control do not use Cypress Street for access to or from this site.
7. The normal hours of operation shall be from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday,
although the foregoing shall not prohibit employees or representatives of the applicant,
owner, or its tenants from being on the site outside the foregoing hours. Such activities and
site visits shall be conducted in a manner to avoid unnecessary noise and shall not cause
a nuisance to the nearby residential properties.
8. The lighting on the site shall be wall or post- mounted and shall shine toward the site.
9. Clean the site by removing all vehicles, unused and inoperable equipment, debris and all
other unused /unusable items.
10. If the city council allows the house to stay on the property, then the occupants of the house
shall have a direct business connection with the business on the site. In addition, the
house shall not be rented to or sold to any person or party that does not have a direct
business relationship with the business on the property.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 2000.
22
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD .B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
APRIL 11, 2000
VI. DESIGN REVIEW
B. Fresh Paint, 1055 Gervais Avenue Sanas Capital Investments
Secretary Tom Ekstrand presented the staff report. Boardmembers questioned how the site
plan would differ if the residence was removed and the new building located further to the
south. Mr. Ekstrand said the board could discuss this but the applicant is quite certain that he
would like. approval from the city council to keep the house. He said screening is needed to
protect the house to the west from headlights. The applicant would have the option of planted
materials or fencing as a screen.
Tom Schaffhausen, the applicant, was present at the meeting. He said the new building will
have neutral colors (tans, dark green, etc.). Mr. Schaffhausen was told by his excavator that
there will be enough soil from the removal of the existing garage to provide a more level
grade for the whole property. He said the brick would be a neutral tan or brown. Some of the
window or door trim might be green. When final selection of the colors has been completed,
Mr. Ekstrand said he would review them.
Chairperson Ledvina was "a little uneasy" with this proposal. He noted that staff
recommended removal of the residence. He pointed out that this would alter many aspects of
the current site plan. Secretary Ekstrand thought this concern should be connected to the
conditional use permit and other members agreed. Boardmember Shankar thought the color
of the proposed building should be considered independently from the color of the existing
residence. Chairperson Ledvina asked for confirmation that the board would review this
application again to look at a screening plan. His preference was for berms and planting
material or, , if necessary, berms and planting material with a fence.
Boardmember Shankar moved the Community Design Review Board:
B. Approve the project plans date - stamped January 20, 2000, for the Fresh Paint facility at
1055 Gervais Avenue, based on the findings required by the code. The property owner or
applicant shall:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Before the city issues a building permit for the new office /warehouse, complete the
following:
a. Have the community design review board (CDRB) approve a screening plan for
the area on the west side of the proposed parking lot between the proposed
building and the existing house. This screening must be at least 80 percent
opaque and at least six feet tall. The screening requirement may be met with a
berm, a fence, plantings or a combination of design and materials.
b. Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for
approval. The erosion control plan shall meet all ordinance requirements. The
grading and storm water plans shall direct all impervious surfaces (roofs,
Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes of 04 -11 -00
driveway and parking areas) to the south and into a storm sewer that the
developer connects to the existing city system to the west of the site.
c. Submit a building -color scheme of neutral colors to city staff for approval.
d. Get a demolition permit from the city and remove the existing garage and house.
If the city council allows the house to stay on the site, then get a demolition permit
for the garage.
e. The applicant shall submit a lighting plan for city staff approval.
3. Complete the following before occupying the new office /warehouse building:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. Restore and seed or sod any and all disturbed
ground such as the areas of driveway or blacktop removal. Remove all old driveway
entrances and restore with sod.
c. Provide handicap- accessible'parking spaces as the ADA (Americans with Disabilities
Act) requires. Install a handicap- parking sign for each handicap- parking space.
d. Screen all roof- mounted equipment visible from adjacent residential properties. Such
equipment visible on non - residential sides must be painted to match the building color.
code requirement)
e. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure if there will be any outdoor storage of refuse.
The enclosure must match the building in color and materials and shall have a
closeable gate that is 100 percent opaque.
f. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all lawn areas on the front and on the sides of
the new office /warehouse building and on all sides of the existing house
g. Provide site - security lighting as required by the city code. The light source, including
the lens covering the bulb, shall be concealed or shielded so not to cause any
nuisance to vehicle drivers or to adjacent property owners. There shall be no lighting
on the back of the building unless required by the building code.
h. Post the west side of the new driveway and the west side of the parking area for "no
parking."
I. Install continuous concrete curb and gutter around all parking areas and the driveway.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives cash escrow for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent
of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by
Community Design Review Board -3-
Minutes of 04 -11 -00
June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy
if the building,, is occupied in the spring or summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished
work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
6. If the city council requires removal of the house through the CUP process, the applicant
shall resubmit a revised site plan to the community design review board for approval.
Boardmember LaCasse seconded. Ayes all
The motion passed.
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 04 -17 -2000
on the property. He felt this would be allowed as long as their was some. connection between
the commercial and residential use. Mr. Dierking was of the opinion that the code could easily
have stated the buildings would have to be within one structure if that was the intention. He said
it would not work well to move the existing house to the front of the property.
Mr. Dierking confirmed that Sanas Capital Investments would own and maintain the house. Mr.
Schaffhausen stated that, at the time they signed the purchase agreement for the property, city
staff had not indicated that keeping the house on the site would be a problem. Mr. Dierking
pointed out that the house could possibly be used as office space sometime in the future. The
applicant also stated that there will not be a flammable waste trap in the building. Commissioner
Rossbach said it was his understanding that a drain in a commercial garage situation had to
have a flammable trap. Mr. Schaffhausen said he stood corrected on the matter.
Commissioner Ledvina moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for Thomas
Schaffhausen of Sanas Capital Investments to construct an office /warehouse building on the
property at 1055 Gervais Avenue. This request needs this permit because the new building
would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district. The city bases the approval on the
findings required by code and is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city date - stamped
January 20, 2000, except that the owner shall remove the existing house and garage
from the site.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The city council may require additional parking in the future if the council determines that
there is a need for additional parking on the site.
5. There shall be no outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, materials or supplies, except
the personal vehicles of the employees, permitted on the site.
6. Except in the event of a bona fide emergency, the applicant's commercial traffic and
vehicles shall use Gervais Avenue and the Highway 61 frontage road for access to this
site. The applicant or owner shall use all reasonable efforts to insure that commercial
vehicles under its control do not use Cypress Street for access to or from this site.
7. The normal hours of operation shall be from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday,
although the foregoing shall not prohibit employees or representatives of the applicant,
owner, or its tenants from being on the site outside the foregoing hours. Such activities
and site visits shall be conducted in a manner to avoid unnecessary noise and shall not
cause a nuisance to the nearby residential properties.
8. The lighting on the site shall be wall or post- mounted and shall shine toward the site.
9. Clean the site by removing all vehicles, unused and inoperable equipment, debris and all
other unused /unusable items.
10. If the city council allows the house to stay on the property, then the occupants of the
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 04 -17 -2000
house shall have a direct business connection -with the business on the site. In addition,
the house shall not be rented to or sold to any person or party that does not have a direct
business relationship with the business on the property.
11. The office /warehouse building shall be relocated to the southern portion of the site to the
extent feasible to maximize the distance between the existing residential to the north
and the proposed building.
Commissioner Rossbach seconded.
Commissioner Ledvina did not want to go into details as to how to position the building. He
just wanted whatever was feasible in regard to parking, setbacks, etc. Commissioner Frost
questioned if Conditions 1 and 11 together were contradictory. Ms. Coleman said the
motion and minutes would reflect the action of the planning commission.
Chairperson Fischer decided to divide the question and call for a separate vote because of
the differing opinions on whether the house should remain. Staff had no recommendation to
substitute the verbiage contained in the letter of April 7, 2000, from Winthrop & Weinstine.
It was agreeable and seconded, as a friendly amendment, to substitute the wording from the
Winthrop & Weinstine letter on Conditions 6 and 7 of the Recommendations.
Chairperson Fischer called for a vote on Item 1 of the Recommendations: All construction
shall follow the site plan approved by the city, date - stamped January 20, 2000, except that
the owner shall remove the existing house and garage from the site.
Ayes Ledvina, Rossbach
Nays -- Fischer, Frost, Thompson, Trippler,
Abstain Mueller
The motion failed.
Chairperson Fischer called for a vote on the motion which adopts the resolution to approve a
conditional use permit for the property at 1055 Gervais Avenue but Condition 1 would read:
All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city, date- stamped January 20,
2000, except that the owner shall remove the existing garage from the site. Conditions 6
and 7 shall have the wording from the April 7, 2000, letter from Winthrop & Weinstine,
substituted for the wording that is currently in these conditions. Condition 11 from the above
motion was contingent on removal of the existing house and is now struck from the motion.
Commissioner Rossbach felt the commission did not vote on Commissioner Ledvina's
motion. He concluded that they voted on the chair's move to separate it into two separate
votes. Chairperson Fischer agreed that Conditions 2 through 10 were not voted on.
Commissioner Ledvina said he was not withdrawing his motion, only eliminating
Condition 11. Chairperson Fischer said that Condition 1 was voted on and Condition 11
was withdrawn by Mr. Ledvina. Commissioner Rossbach asserted that the vote did not
change Condition 1; he maintained that it was necessary to vote on the remainder or the
motion should be withdrawn and a new motion made. Commissioner Mueller was of the
opinion that they had voted to let the house remain so it didn't matter what they voted
on he even felt Condition 10 was irrelevant. Ms. Coleman said that Condition 10 should
remain.
Chairperson Fischer then called for a vote on the motion that the Planning Commission
recommend:
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 04 -17 -2000
A. Adopt of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for Thomas
Schaffhausen of Sanas capital Investments to construct an office /warehouse building on
the property at 1055 Gervais Avenue. This request needs this permit because the new
building would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district. The city bases the
approval on the findings required by code and is subject to the following conditions:
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this
deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4.- . The city council may require additional parking in the future if the council determines
that there is a need for additional parking on the site.
5. There shall be no outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, materials or supplies,
except the personal vehicles of the employees, permitted on the site.
6. Except in the event of a bona fide emergency, the applicant's commercial traffic and
vehicles shall use Gervais Avenue and the Highway 61 frontage road for access to
this site. The applicant or owner shall use all reasonable efforts to insure that
commercial vehicles under its control do not use Cypress Street for access to or from
this site.
7. The normal hours of operation shall be from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through
Saturday, although the foregoing shall not prohibit employees or representatives of
the applicant, owner, or its tenants from being on the site outside the foregoing
hours. Such activities and site visits shall be conducted in a manner to avoid
unnecessary noise and shall not cause a nuisance to the nearby residential
properties.
8. The lighting on the site shall be wall or post- mounted and shall shine toward the site.
9. Clean the site by removing all vehicles, unused and inoperable equipment, debris
and all other unused /unusable items.
10. If the city council allows the house to stay on the property, then the occupants of the
house shall have a direct business connection with the business on the site. In
addition, the house shall not be rented to or sold to any person or party that does not
have a direct business relationship with the business on the property.
Ayes— Fischer, Frost, Ledvina, Thompson ,
Trippler
Nays Rossbach
Abstain -- Mueller
The motion passed.
Commissioner Mueller said he abstained because he would have preferred that the applicant
return with a reason why they couldn't move the house. He felt that if he voted in favor "it
would mean that it didn't matter" to him. If he voted to remove the house, it says "maybe
they know something I don't." Commissioner Thompson voted for approval because he felt
staff indicated to the applicant, at some time within the process, "some degree of
acceptance" for the structure to remain.
City of Maplewood
Official Sign -Up Sheet
By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the
Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes.
Name (first &last) - please print Address
2.
3. (1Kf, TT,:m - eA Ao s
4.
s.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT Action by Council
Date
TO: City Managerer
Endorsed
Modified
FROM: Assistant City Engineerineer Rejected
SUBJECT: Award of Bids, Hazelwood Street Improvements, City Project 99 -07p Y !
DATE: May 1, 2000
Bids for the Hazelwood Street Improvement project are scheduled to be opened at
10 a.m. on Friday, May 5, 2000.
A tabulation of those bids, a staff recommendation, as well as the corresponding
resolution, will be made available with a supplementary report, to be inserted into the
agenda packet at that time.
CIVIC
1
TABULATION OF BIDS
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, la special meeting of the officials designated for
a bid opening by the City Council of Maplewood was convened at 10 a.m., Friday,
May .5, 2000. The purpose of this meeting was to receive, open and publicly read aloud
bids for construction of Hazelwood Street, Gervais Avenue to County Road C. Project
99 -07.
Present were: Chris Cavett and Bill Priebe
Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids, the following bids were
opened and read:
Bidder. Amount BidBond ffidavit EEO ADA
T. A. Schifsky & Sons $609 5% x x x
Dresel Contracting, Inc. 653 5% x x x
Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. 652 5% x x x
Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the city clerk referred the bids :received to
the city engineer instructing him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation
at the regular city council meeting of May 8, 2000.
Meeting adjourned at 10 a.m.
RESOLUTION FOR. AWARD OF BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA,that the bid of T. A. Schifsk and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $609,1.38.43 is the lowest
responsible bid for the construction of Hazelwood Street Improvements from GervaisAvenuetoCountRoadC, Cit Project 99-07 and the ma and clerk are herebauthorizedanddirectedtoenterintoacontract, with said bidder for and on behalf of the
cit
The finance director is hereb authorized to make the financial transfers
necessar to implement the financin plan for the project.
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Department of Public Works
AGENDA ITEM NO....
Memorandum
DATE April 19, 200
TOO Ken Haider, Director of Public Works
FROM* Lance Lundsten, Public Works Coordinator
SUBJECT: Equipment Purchase
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The 2000 Budget contains an amount of $22,370.00 for the replacement of a Park
maintenance mower. Pricing through the State of Minnesota bid is $22,347.96 including
tax, after trade of the existing mower.
The 2000 Budget also contains an amount of $221,520.00 for replacement of two 1986
dump /plow trucks. $1 14,804 has been expended for the cab /chassis which leaves
106,716.00 for outfitting of the trucks (box, hydraulics, controls, plus plow /wing/sander
remounts). Staff has received a quote from Truck Utilities in the amount of $73,7$7.46
for the work. The State bid price from Crysteel Truck Equipment, is $60,457.53 (both
include tom).
Recommend award of purchase to M.T.I. Distributing, in the amount of $22,347.96 for
replacement mower, and award of purchase in the amount of $60,457.53 for outfitting of
two plow /dump trucks to Crysteel Truck Equipment. Both are through State bid. pricing.
LAL /meo
Attachments
qr rvIT11DISTRIBUTING, INC,
TO: DENIMS HMVANXY
CITY OF MAMEW001D
1830 & COUNTY ROAD 13
M"Lzw000, mril 35
Phone: Fax: 651
We are plened to quote *9 fotlowl"t *Uipi„cRls
Anti 0escoption
l TORO 32 `431], WHEEL DRIVE, WITH 72" SID$ DISC *jARI'IE
MO% NG DECK, 2 POST ROFS, SERvIC.E MAN A.L
3 RING BINDER, FILTE KIT.
I ETI3C 60" 3 24" POTARY JaRGOM, F`OWBR ANG)LINO,
P DRIVEN, (1) MCA WEIGHT, (3) FLAT WEIGHTS,
3" LIFT CYLINDER.
i QUICK ATTACH FOR TRACTION U111T
I QUICK ATTACH FOR SIDE DISCIAYtCrE a3ECK
1 GAB ENCLOSURE FOR 300 SERIES, Et4cL.LMES HEATER,WT'S, LIGIJTS, FAST, ROOF FI.ASHM.
SUB
I TRADE IIN OF TORO 3251D, DECK, CAB,, BROOM
Date 4/3100
Tern=NET 130
u4ttd are:
F.O.B.I "LEWOOD
01011rery 30 / DAYS
Net Etch Net Tatal
TOTAL
THIS QUOTE wmUOEs SET -UP, SERVICE, ANEW dab Total w/DELIVERY. Trade
NOTE-' SALES TAX NOT INCLUDED. Ides Tax
Customer S' °tal
Sales Teat - Bob Prank, Ron Swenson Phone 1-800-760-3463
VtQuotaflOn Good For 30 D 11sy
S16
4,500.00
S4Q.00
140.00
3,445.00
25,2K00
4,300.00
20,9$4.00
1063.96
22,347.46
1 4900 - Twenty -first Avenue North • Plymouth, Lftnesota 55447-4655 * Phone (812) 476-22M • Fax (61 2) 473 -4397
04103100 1.1:25 TX /RX N0.3418 P.001
TRUCK
UTILITIESCO G0
2370 English Street at Highway 36 St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 - 2098 (651) 484 -3305 Fax: ( 651) 484 -0076
April 17, 2000
City Of Maplewood
Phone# 770 -4585
Attn: Dennis
ONE 1 HENDERS N MARK TWO DXM BOD
Length 10' - overall length with 24'732 " high sides /rear
Unibody design (No cross members, low mounting height)
5" Structural I -beam longitudinals.
Low 9" mounting height.
l 0ga sides and ends.
One piece 3/16" HSLA steel floor.
Full height front comer posts.
One intermediate horizontal side brace each side.
5 -3/4" x 12" Full depth rear corner post tied to an 8" structural channel rear apron.
Manual double over center tailgate release mechanism.
Tailgate has full perimeter boxing with sloped horizontal brace and top rail.
Sloped, fully boxed, formed top rail.
4" Structural channel subframe with 6" x 4" x 3/8" structural rear hinge.
1 -1 /2" diameter nitrided rear hinge pins with greaseless composite bushings.
All pivot points have greaseless composite bushings and nitrided pins.
Telescopic trunnion mounted.
Light kit with one piece wiring harness for clearance lights and stop, turn, tail light in rear corner posts.
Body is chemically cleaned with a phosphate solution before being primed.
Finish paint any one color urethane then heat baked.
Capacity: 6 -8 Yard
One set anti -sail mudflaps.
TELESCOPIC CYLINDER:
Nitrided cylinder tubes.
Two (2) year cylinder warranty
Oscillating cylinder collar 'lets the cylinder move with the body,
reducing side loading on the cylinder.
Trunnion -mount design reduces dog house.
No packing nut to adjust or maintain.
BASE PRICE: Includes mounting to chassis, DOT 108 body lights,
hookup of OEM tail lights $7
Your truck equipment specialists
www.truckutilities.com
On/off or proportional joystick controllers
Custom LED backlit nomenclature
Audible and visual warning indicators11
Master power switch
Seven (7)15 Amp auxiliary switches
Individual current limiting for each function
Color coded wiring throughout
Bulkhead connections for all cables
Large selection of valve harnesses available
Manual spreader control
30gal slim -line res.
Spin -on filter with 12 volt indicator
Low oil indicator
P -50 commercial gear pump
Front mount PTO M r s:,k
Parker MCV -ISO 8 spool valve
Valve installed on driver .side in protective incloser
ORM , kit - wing lock valve
Base price includes installation, hoses, fittings and fluids. $14
ONE 11 HENDERSON T SALT /SAND SPREADER;
All hydraulic drive
6" Bi- directional flight' auger
9" Continuous flight auger
3/8 Auger fli ting
18" Spiner with stainless steel vanes
Direct drive
Base price includes installation, hoses, and fittings. $21
Your Truck Equipment Specialists
Remove and reinstall adjustable 11' snow plow and side wing plow, price includes
rebuilding behind cab toelheal mount for side wing.3,900.00
Frame mounted 36 "x 18 1 'x 18" cab sheild installed on side wing mount.750.00
Air operated tailgate 252.00
Center lever instal i n tai 1 gate for upper pin retract.175.00
Heavy duty 5/8" pull plate with receiver tube and pintle/ball combo on
receiver insert with safety chain D -rings 555.00
Electric brake controller and 6 -prong socket at rear 250.00
1/4" AR400 floor in leiu of 3/16" HSLA 576.00
Poly fenders installed over rear tires.475.00
Furnish and install aluminum roof mounted light bar with 2-plow lights p installed
one on each side and strobe in center.450.00
2- tractor type lights mounted at rear for sander 125.00
Model 3102D whelen 3 -light head system, price includes one DOT6H lighthead,
strobe, brake/tail/turn, back -up in rear corner posts, ISP94 power supply with
diagnostic indicator panel, switch panel with hi/low intensity control, install
complete.2990.00
SUBTOTAL OF ABOVE........$34,642.00
3 ) za
Sales tax not included
If you have any further questions please feel free to give me a call.
Charlie Miller
Your Truck Equipment Specialists
FrpO David Porinplun To: Lance Lundsten Date: 3124100 Time: 8:48:16 AM Page 2 of 4
EQUIPMENT
Friday, March 24, 2000
Lance Lundsten
City Of Maplewood
1830 County Rd .B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Reference: Equipment for the two singe sole plow trucks
Dear Lance:
612 -571 -1902
800 - 795 -1280
FAX 612 -571 -5091
Pursuant to your request for quotation on the above referenced, we are pleased to submit the
following for your consideration:
State Contract # is 425123 Contract Release # is S- 863(5) March 10, 2000 to March 31, 2001
Two (2) Crysteel Model Western Municipal Bodies, complete to manufacturer's standard
specifications and including
10' x 87" inside dimensions
26" sides and 36" tailgate
1 /4 " floor with 7 ga A -570 sides
Western style understructure, no crossmembers with trapezoidal long sills
1J2 Cab shield stationary type with rubber wiper between the cab and the body
Air tailgate release
Mud flaps
Full length walk rails on both sides
Pull -ou ladder and access steps on the Driver's side front corner
Whelen Model DDT -3 -104 D with boxes recessed in the rear body post
Amber rear strobe lights
Center amber strobe on cab shield (fixed)
6 port power pack in the cab
Sander lijht
Wing Light
Halogen headlights on a roof bar on the cab roof
Shovel holders on the stationary cab shield uprights
Ground strap from subframe to the body
License plate holder on the tailgate
TRUCK 1130 73RD AVEN[JE
FRIDLEY, MN. 55432
03124100 08:45 TX 1R1C NO.3396 P.002 0
From David Pomplun To: Lance Lundsten Date: 3124100 Time: 8:48:96 AM Page 3 of 4
Lights and reflectors to meet FMVSS 10.8
Crysteel Hoist Model RC -750 Underbody Roller combo hoist
Full double acting
Full length subframe
Hydraulics to Include:
Patrol commander control console, pedestal mount
Sander Control Ssc -1100
Air Shift PTO front engine drive with Commercial P -50 pump
Slim line oil reservoir
MSC -ISO Control valve with frame mounted valve enclosure
loop sander controls
Return line oil filter
Hoses for a complete system
HTMA Quick Couplers
Sander quick couplers in the rub rail of the both° sly
Poly fenders over the rear wheels
plate on the rear ( no Hitch)
Safety chain rings
6 prong light plug
Remove and remount Customers Front Hitch and plow Hydraulics
Remove and remount Customers Patrol wing
Furnish and install new rear I -beam style push beam
Furnish and install new hoses for the three functions toe, heel and hydraulic push
pole
Furnish and install a heavy duty wing stop
Remove and remount customers Sanders
Sandblast Bodies
Paint the Bodes and sander mounting brackets
Paint the Black plow and wing mounting hardware
Undercoat the body including the vertical body posts
Net Price each $ 28
Optional:
Add -A Stack Valve in valve enclosure
Morse cable controls for all functions except the sander
Sander Control Electronic S SC- 1100 Force Controller
Deduct from Above $ 4,783.00
I have a demo with this body on to view, and also have bodies in stock for immediate installation.
I could start with the removal of the snow and Ice equipment the first week of April.
Should you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me directly, I
remain,
Sincerely,
David Pomplun
AGENDA ITEM K
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council
TO: Acting City Manager Date
eddors
FROM: Public Works Administrative Assistant
Endorseddined
SUBJECT: Stop Sign Requests
Rejected
DATE: April 25, 2000
In response to the neighborhood stop sign article published in the March 2000
Maplewood in Motion, the public works department received a petition from a
neighborhood group in the Oakridge Development. All -way stop signs have been
requested at the intersections of Sterling Street at Montana Circle and Montana
Avenue, and Sterling Street at Mary Street and Arlington Avenue.
It has also been requested by the school district's bus service that the yield sign for
northbound Hazel Street at Ripley Avenue be replaced with a stop sign due to sight
obstruction by several large evergreen trees. These trees are far too great an asset to
the property to trim or remove.
In accordance with the stop sign policy, the issue of neighborhood stop signs is
considered once a year during the month of May. Petitioners have been notified via
mail and the May issue of Maplewood in Motion, that their stop sign request will be
considered at the May 8, 2000, council meeting.
WJP
jC
Attachments
ETrTIl'
for the installation'of specified road signs
Oak Ridge Estates is a new residential community in the City of Maplewood. For this reason as
well as the City of Maplewood 's policy on traffic signage, the neighborhood's residential
roadways are currently without traffic regulating. stop signs. The.. - undersi ed residents of the
Oak Ridge Estates neighborhood urge the empowered bodies of the City of Maplewood to
approve the request that following stop signs be installed:
19 A four wa sto si be laced at the intersection of Montana Circle and Sterlin
Street in the Oak Ridge Estates residential comma
2. A four wa sto sign be vlaced at the intersection of Montana Avenue and Sterlin a
Street in the Oak Ridge Estate residential community ,
Petitioners
Name Address Phone #
S (Prig.
2. Jt.l'ia She 24 (p 0a.lG C( 51) 14S 91
3. A j . R Ax a'8'6 6 A J P de S - I 7 7 7 v
4, L - i dg x 77 7 — D
f It
5.Z _
i 1 '
I
94L!
8.
i
0 I
11.
12.
r% n
E'CF QA I4 Le
1478 'k t
Ale
BSI - 7 - 3220 /)
PdwaEj rationale for the above requests.
A. The level of traffic on Sterling Street and Montana Avenue warrants the use of
additional neighborhood street signage.
1. Sterling Street and Montana Avenue act as a convenient bypass to the traffic
light on the corner of Larpenteur Avenue East and McKnight Road North for
patrons of Hill Murray High School as well as other local commuters.
1
Z. Use of cul -de -sacs in Oak Ridge Estates has elevated the residential housing
density and the population of those in the area using Street and Montanag
Avenue.
B. Natural elevation changes and inherent contours in Sterling Street and Montana
Avenue partially conceal oncoming and /or crossing traffic at the aforementioned four -
way intersections.
C. Cumulatively, Sterling Street and Montana Avenue are sufficiently expansive
approx. 1 %Z miles) to allow for commuters to reach unreasonable speeds.
D. The requested course of action has been thoughtfully analyzed to produce the least
amount of commuter inconvenience.
E. The requested stop signs are for currently unregulated four -way intersections.
HOLLOWAY AVE.
Hill Murray
High School
LARPENTEUR AVE. E.
c Idaho Ave. E.
low
Southbound traffic on
Sterlln Sfreet Is concealed
CD o0 to all other traffic, y
CL
Mont Ci Montana Ave.
2
Ali, .:..L • _. r,, ,.:r+, :,.,!'
Hoyt Ave.
Oak Cir.
rn
5.O
z
In response to the stop sign article in the March issue
of Maplewood in Motion, the public works department
received petitions for stop signs at three intersections.
In most cases, petitioners
feel that their residential
streets are being used to avoid
the adjacent through streets,
which are controlled by stop
lights. The uncontrolled
residential streets have
become speedways and short
cuts. Without sidewalks in
these typical Maplewood
residential neighborhoods,
walking or roller blading in the
street has become hazardous.
All -way stop signs have
been requested at the
intersections of Sterling Street
at Montana Circle and •
Montana Avenue and Sterling
Street at Mary Street and
Arlington Avenue (refer to
Map 1) It has also been
requested that the yield sign for
north bound Hazel Street at
Ripley Avenue be replaced with a
stop sign due to sight obstruction
by several large evergreen trees.
refer to Map 2).
In dealing with the issue of
placement of stop signs, a
distinction must be made between
stop signs for residential
neighborhoods and warranted stop
signs for traffic control on the rest
of the street system. The
GW
go CQUA
IN AWE. d
k -
nnn
AVE.
placement of stop signs in the city is regulated4
f.1..by and consistent with the Minnesota
fc •aRf
f :::. ,. =° " :h:,.rw Manual of Uniform Traffic ControlS;f) • N fy`4:: S:Cpi'!_ -., y`f..4y:': ,i. h:.•::C}.Y . / ! Devices ( This manual is
adopted by the city ordinance to regulate
all street signage, markings, and signals.
Lcr w
F dT
BUR
d H VE.
LNU
IMIroMr
courrtr
i sk
4 LN
RD
s COMM w
Studies by the Institute ofTransportation Engineers
indicate that stop signs that do not meet the standard
warrants of MnMUTCD tend, to some extent, to be
ignored by drivers, whereas, stop
signs placed for right -of -way
purposes are more likely to be
AVE. O obeyed. Other studies show. that
ID" ME
stop signs tend to increase noise in
the vicinity f the intersection by
adding. accelerating and braking
MCI. noise. Deceleration, idling, and
Co. acceleration increase air pollution
Doti` and fuel consumption with an
adverse impact on the air equalip
s z in the immediate vicinity.
0 co
w
Although the MnMUTCD
states that stop signs should only
be used where warranted by facts
and field studies, residential
neighborhoods often present
special cases. Typically, traffic
volumes are very low and are
not easily quantified. Intersection
design, frequency, and spacing are
quite variable. Cul -de -sacs,
housing density, curves, and sight
distance are not uniform from one
subdivision to another. This
neighborhood "uniqueness" makes
it unreasonable to create any
uniform criteria for stop sign
placement. Although many
neighborhood intersections are not
even close to meeting warrants,
other factors and criteria beyond
the MnMUTCD have been
persuasive and can be used.
By adopting the neighborhood stop sign policy, the city
council sought to provide a forum for citizen input and
open discussion of the pros and cons of stop sign
placement. The regular May 8 council meeting (7p. m. at
city hall) will provide such a forum and an opportunity to
consider these stop sign requests.
AGENDA NO. K2,
AGENDA REPORT Action by Council
TO: Acting City Manager
FROM: Finance Director An "
RE: Preliminary Approval of Fire Safety Bond Issue
DATE: April 26, 2000
PROPOSAL
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
It is proposed that the City Council (A) adopt the attached resolution which provides
preliminary approval for the sale of the $3,540,000 General Obligation Fire Safety
Bonds and (B) schedule a special Council meeting at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, June
8th for a bid award on the bond issue.
BACKGROUND
City voters authorized the issuance of $3,540,000 General Obligation Fire Safety
Bonds at a referendum held on November 2, 1999. It was anticipated that these
bonds would require a property tax levy of $308,411 to $313,530 annually for 20
years based upon interest rates in effect last year. The latest financial projections
indicate that the property tax levy will range from $138,932.50 to $315,643.13
annually for 21 years. This amount will change again when the interest rate on the
bonds will be set based upon the bid award on June 8th.
The attached report from Springsted Incorporated provides additional information. It
also recommends a bid award on the bond sale at a special Council meeting at 5:00
p.m.. on Thursday, June 8th. (There is apre- agenda meeting that day at 4:45 p.m.)
This will enable the City to receive the bond sale proceeds by June 30th and will
minimize the interest expense charges on the costs incurred already. It will also
maximize the investment interest earnings on the remaining bond proceeds until they
are expended.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council (A) adopt the attached resolution which
provides preliminary approval for the sale of the $3,540,000 General Obligation Fire
Safety Bonds and (B) schedule a special Council meeting at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday,
June 8th for a bid award on the bond issue.
C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\PERM\OOBONDS1.WPD
Recommendations
For
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
3,540,000
General Obligation. re Safety Bonds,. Series 2000A
Presented to:
Mayor Robert Cardinal
Members, City Council
Mr. Dan Faust, Finance Director
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797
SPRINGSTED
Public Finance Advisors
Study No.: M1408
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
April 27, 2000 zrj
A
RECOMMENDATIONS
Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of $3,540,000 General Obligation Fire Safety
Bonds, Series 2000A
We respectfully request your consideration of the above named issue.
We recommend the following for the bonds:
1. Action Requested To establish the date and time of receiving
bids and establish the terms and conditions
of the offering.
2. Sale Date and Time
3. Authority and Purpose for the Bond Issue
4. Principal Amount of Offering
5. Repayment Term
6. First Levy and Levy Cycle
7. Term Bonds
Thursday, June 8, 2000 at 10:00 A.M. with
consideration for award by the City Council
at 5:00 P.M. that same evening.
The Bonds are being issued pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475 and a
voter approved referendum. On
November 2, 1999, City voters approved a
referendum by a vote of 4,845 (yes) to 3,142
no) to issue general obligation bonds in an
amount not to exceed $3,540,000. The
proceeds of the bonds will be used to defray
the expense of the acquisition and
betterment, of a fire station and fire
equipment and apparatus for the City.
3
Interest on the bonds will be payable
February 1 and August 1, commencing
February 1, 2001. The bonds will mature
annually February 1, 2002 through 2021.
The City will make the first levy for this issue
in 2000. The interest payment on
February 1, 2001 will be made from
available City funds. Thereafter, first -half
collection of taxes will be used to make each
August 1 interest payment due in the year of
collection and second -half collections plus
surplus first -half collections will cover the
subsequent February 1 principal and interest
payments.
We have included in the attached Terms of
Proposal a provision which permits
underwriters to combine multiple maturity
years into a term bond, subject to mandatory
redemption as the original maturity schedule
provided in the Terms of Offering. The term
bond option provides underwriters with the
City of Maplewood., Minnesota
April 27, 2.000
8. Prepayment Provisions
9. Credit Rating Comments
10. Federal Treasury Regulations Concerning
Tax - Exempt Obligations
flexibility to create larger blocks of bonds
which are more attractive to bond funds and
certain pension funds that only deal with
larger amounts of bonds. This, in turn, is an
advantage to the City. By offering larger
blocks of bonds, underwriters reduce their
risk and can thus lower their costs and
interest coupons, resulting in lower annual
debt service payments for the City. Since
the Bonds are being offered on a
competitive bid basis and awarded on the
lowest true interest cost, the City will award
each issue to the best bid regardless of
whether term bonds are chosen or not.
The City may elect on February 1, 2009 and
on any day thereafter, to prepay the Bonds
due on or after February 1, 2010 at a price
of par plus accrued interest.
An application will be made to Moody's
Investors Service for a rating on the bonds.
Moody's currently rates the City's general
obligation debt as 'Aa2 11
a) Bank Qualification Under Federal Tax Law, financial institutions
cannot deduct from income for federal
income tax purposes, income expense that
is allocable to carrying and acquiring tax-
exempt bonds. There is an exemption to
this for "bank qualified" bonds, which can be
so designated if the issuer does not issue
more than $10 million of tax exempt bonds
in a calendar year. Issues -that are bank
qualified receive slightly lower interest rates
than issues that are not bank qualified. This
issue is designated as bank qualified.
b) Rebate Requirements All tax - exempt issues are subject to the
federal arbitrage and rebate requirements,
which require all excess earnings created by
the financing to be rebated to the U.S.
Treasury. The requirements generally cover
two categories: bond proceeds and debt
service funds. However, since the City
expects to issue less than $5,000,000 of tax -
exempt obligations in 2000, the City will be
exempt from rebating excess earnings on
the bond proceeds to the federal
government.
Page 2
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
April 27, 2000
c) Bona Fide Debt Service Fund The City must maintain a bona fide debt
service fund for the Bonds or be subject.to
yield restriction. This requires restricting the
investments held in the debt service fund to
the yield on the bonds and /or paying _back
excess investment earnings in the debt
service, fund to the federal government. A
bona fide debt service fund is a fund for
which there is an equal matching of revenue
to debt service expense, with carry over
permitted equal to the greater of the
investment. earnings in the fund during that
year or 1/12 the debt service of that year. -
d) Economic Life The average life of the Bonds cannot exceed
120% of the economic life of the projects to
be financed. The economic life of the fire
station and equipment purchased exceeds
the average maturity of the bonds (12.935
years); therefore, the issue is within the
economic life requirements.
11. Continuing Disclosure This issue is subject to the SEC's continuing _
disclosure requirements. The SEC rules
require the City to undertake an annual
update of its Official Statement information
and report any material events to the
national repositories. In the past, the City
has .indicated that it will perform continuing
disclosure services itself.
12. Attachments Composition of Issue
Debt Service Schedule(s)
Terms of Proposal
Page 3
a
f
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
o , April 27, 2000
DISCUSSION
On November 2, 1999, City voters approved a referendum to issue general obligation fire safety
bonds in an aggregate amount not to exceed $3,540,000. Proceeds of the authorized amount
will be used to defray the expense of the acquisition and betterment of a fire station and fire
equipment and apparatus for the City.
Sources and uses of the proceeds are shown on page 4. Page 5 shows our recommended
principal structure and estimated annual debt service for the bonds. The principal in column 2
has been structured to provide the City with relatively even annual debt service payments. The
projected interest rates used in column 3 are those which we believe the City would receive in
the current market,. with the exception for the early years. The Bonds will be sold at par which
will not allow a discount to the underwriter. This will maximize the Bond proceeds received by
the"City Therefore, ` the rates are higher.in the early years to .allow underwriters to recover their
costs and. realize a profit based on a par bid of $3,540,000. The first levy for the Bonds will be
in 2000. Because the first tax collection for this issue will occur in May 2001, the City will use
funds on hand to make the February 1, 2001 interest payment.
Respectfully submitted,
t JJJ
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
kli
Page 4
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
3,540,000 General Obligation Fire Safety Bonds
Series 2000A
SOURCES &USES
I Dated 06/01/2000 Delivered 06/01/2000 1
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Par Amount of Bonds ........................... ...............................3,540,000.00
Reoffering Premium.......... .....:............... ...............................46,229.85
TOTAL SOURCES ............................... ...............................3
USES OF FUNDS
Total Underwriter's Discount (1. 306%) ...............................46
Costs of Issuance ................................. ...............................28,650.00
Deposit to Project Fund ........................ ...............................3
TOTALUSES ....................................... ............................... $3,586,229.85
Springsted Incorporated ood. sf -2000A Fire Safety SINGLE PURPOSE
Public Finance Advisors 412412000 9:04 AM
Page 4
YIELD STATISTICS
Dated...................................................................................... ............................... 6/01/2000
FirstCoupon Date ................................................................... ............................... 2/01/2001
BondYear Dollars ................................................................... ............................... $45
AverageLife ............................................................................ ............................... 12.935 Years
AverageCoupon ..................................................................... ............................... 5.5753585%
NetInterest Cost ( NIC) ............................................................ ............................... 5.5753585%
TrueInterest Cost ( TIC) .......................................................... ............................... 5.5722220%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes .......................................... ............................... 5.4234708%
AllInclusive Cost ( AIC) ............................ ..........................0.... ............0..........00.0.... 5o6658501%
IRS FORM 8038
NetInterest Cost ....... ............................... 0........0.......0......0.0.... .....0000...................... 5.4404948%
Weighted Average Maturity ..................................................... ............................... 12.848 Years
Springsted Incorporated
Public Finance Advisors
File = Maplewood.sf- -2000A Fire Safety- SINGLE PURPOSE
412412000 9:04 AM
Page 5
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
3,540,000 General Obligation Fire Safety Bonds
Series 2000A
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I 105% of Total
2/01/2001 132,316.67 132,316.67 138,932.50
2/01/2002 100,000.00 5.900%198 298 313
2/01/2003 105,000.00 5.900%192,575.00 297,575.00 312,453.75
2/01/2004 110,000.00 5.900%186,380.00 296 311,199.00
2/01/2005 120,000.00 5.900%179 299,890.00 314,884.50
2701 /2006 125 5.900%172, 810.00 297, 810.00 312, 700.50
2/01/2007 130,000.00 5.900%165,435.00 295,435.00 310,206.75
2/01/2008 140,000.00 6.000%157,765.00 297,765.00 312,653.25
2/01/2009 150,000.00 6.000%149,365.00 299,365.00 314
2/01/2010 155, 000.00 5.100%140, 365.00 295, 365.00 310,133.25
2/01/2011 165 5.150%132,460.00 297 312
2/01/2012 175,000.00 5.250%123,962.50 298,962.50 313,910.63
2/01 /2013 185,000.00 5.300%114,775.00 299,775.00 314,763.75
2/01/2014 195, 000.00 5.350%104, 970.00 299, 970.00 314, 968.50
2/01/2015 205,000.00 5.450%94 299,537.50 314,514.38
2/01/2016 215 5.500%83,365.00 298,365.00 313,283.25
2/01/2017 225, 000.00 5.550%71, 540.00 296, 540.00 311, 367.00
2/01/2018 240,000.00 5.600%59,052.50 299 314,005.13
2/01/2019 255,000.00 5.650%45 300,612.50 315,643.13
2/01/2020 265,000.00 5.700%31,205.00 296 311,015.25
2/01/2021 280 5.750%16 296,100.00 310,905.00
Total 3 2,552,956..67 6 6
YIELD STATISTICS
Dated...................................................................................... ............................... 6/01/2000
FirstCoupon Date ................................................................... ............................... 2/01/2001
BondYear Dollars ................................................................... ............................... $45
AverageLife ............................................................................ ............................... 12.935 Years
AverageCoupon ..................................................................... ............................... 5.5753585%
NetInterest Cost ( NIC) ............................................................ ............................... 5.5753585%
TrueInterest Cost ( TIC) .......................................................... ............................... 5.5722220%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes .......................................... ............................... 5.4234708%
AllInclusive Cost ( AIC) ............................ ..........................0.... ............0..........00.0.... 5o6658501%
IRS FORM 8038
NetInterest Cost ....... ............................... 0........0.......0......0.0.... .....0000...................... 5.4404948%
Weighted Average Maturity ..................................................... ............................... 12.848 Years
Springsted Incorporated
Public Finance Advisors
File = Maplewood.sf- -2000A Fire Safety- SINGLE PURPOSE
412412000 9:04 AM
Page 5
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
3,540,000
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION FIRE SAFETY BONDS, SERIES 2000A
BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Thursday, June 8, 2000, until 10:00 A.M., Central
Time, a't the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul,
Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the
Bonds will be by the City Council at 5:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3002 to Springsted.
Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the
time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal
price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3002 for inclusion in the
submitted Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach'
Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal
shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds
regardless of the manner of the Proposal submitted.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated June 1, 2000, as the date of original issue,and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2001.Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
2002 $100,000 2007 $130,000 2012 $175,000 2017 225,000
2003 $105,000 2008 $140,000 2013 $185 2018 240,000
2004 $110,000 2009 $150 2014 $195,000 2019 255,000
2005 $120 2010 $155,000 2015 $205,000 2020 265,000
2006 $125,000 2011 $165,000 2016 $215,000 2021 280,000
Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial
bonds and term bonds, provided that no serial bond may mature on or after the first mandatory
sinking fund redemption date of any term bond. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory
sinking fund redemption and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above at a price of
par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. In order to designate term bonds, the
proposal must specify "Last Year of Serial Maturities" and "Years of Term Maturities" in the
spaces provided on the Proposal Form.
Page 6
1, N
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bonds,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "),
New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases
of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single
maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants.
Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of
the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the
responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by
participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial
owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the
Bonds with DTC.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City
will pay for the services of the registrar.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on February 1, 2009, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or_
after February 1, 2010. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the -
City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are
called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be
prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to
be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in
such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. The proceeds will be used to finance
the acquisition and betterment of a fire station, fire equipment, and apparatus for the City.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $3,540,000 (Par) and accrued interest on the total principal
amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in
the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $35,400,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany the proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must
identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the
Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central
Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time,
the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement.
The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at
settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to
comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can
Page 7
to
be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the
City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date
without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or
1/8 of 1 %. There is no limit on the interest rate spread if quoted in ascending _order; however,
no rate for any maturity shall be more than 1.0% lower than any prior rate. Bonds of the same
maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No
conditional proposals will be accepted.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of
matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals
without cause, and, (iii.) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply
with the terms herein.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of
the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of
insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received ar
rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating
agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bonds nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the
purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of
Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no-
litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal,
or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later
than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds
shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be
liab -le to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance
with said terms for payment.
Page 8
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
On the date of actual issuance and delivery of the Bonds, the City will execute and deliver a
Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (the "Undertaking ") whereunder the City will covenant for the
benefit of the owners of the Bonds to provide certain financial and other information about the
City and notices of certain occurrences to information repositories as specified in and required
by SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5).
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information
relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official Statement
within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of
the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is
referred. to the. Financial Advisor to, the City, Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place,
Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101; telephone (651) 223 -3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 140 copies of the.
Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the -
senior managing underwriter . of the syndicate to which, the Bonds are awarded as its agent fore -
purposes .of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter.
Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its
proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a
contractual .relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring
the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated May 8, 2000 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
s/ Karen Guilfoile
City Clerk
4/24/00 3:14 PM
Page 9
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATED
SALE OF $3,540,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION FIRE SAFETY BONDS,
SERIES 2000A
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the
City "), has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue its
3,540,000 General Obligation Fire Safety Bonds, Series 2000A (the "Bonds ") to defray
the expense of the acquisition and betterment of a fire station and fire equipment and
apparatus for the City, all as approved by the votes at the November 2, 1999, election;
and
B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Springsted Incorporated, in Saint Paul,
Minnesota ("Springsted"), as its independent financial advisor and is therefore authorized
to sell these obligations by a competitive negotiated sale in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Authorization. The City Council hereby authorizes Springsted to solicit
bids for the competitive negotiated sale of the Bonds.
2. Meeting; Bid Opening. This City Council shall meet at the time and place
specified in the Terms of Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A for the purpose of consideringg
sealed bids for, and awarding the sale of, the Bonds. The Clerk or her designee, shall open bids
at the time and place specified in such Terms of Proposal.
3. Terms of Proposal. The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the
negotiation thereof are fully set forth in the "Terms of Proposal" attached hereto as Exhibit A
and hereby approved and made a part hereof.
4. Official Statement. In connection with said competitive negotiated sale,
the Clerk and other officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with
Springsted and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds, and to
execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion.
P:\FINANCE \WP\MISC \2000BOND.WPD
EXHIBIT A
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
3,540,000
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION FIRE SAFETY BONDS, SERIES 2000A
BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Thursday, June 8, 2000, until 10:00 A.M., Central
Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul,
Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the
Bonds will be by the City Council at 5:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3002 to Springsted.
Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the
time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal
price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3002 for inclusion in the
submitted Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach
Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal
shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds
regardless of the manner of the Proposal submitted.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated June 1, 2000, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2001. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
2002 100,000 2007 130 2012 175,000 2017 225,000
2003 105,000 2008 140,000 2013 185,000 2018 240,000
2004 110,000 2009 150 2014 195,000 2019 255
2005 120,000 2010 155,000 2015 205,000 2020 265,000
2006 125 2011 165,000 2016 215,000 2021 280,000
Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial
bonds and term bonds, provided that no serial bond may mature on or after the first mandatory
sinking fund redemption date of any term bond. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory
sinking fund redemption and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above at a price of
par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. In order to designate term bonds, the
proposal must specify "Last Year of Serial Maturities" and "Years of Term Maturities" in the
spaces provided on the Proposal Form.
Page 1
EXHIBIT A
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bonds,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "),
New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases
of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single
maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants.
Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of
the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the
responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by
participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial
owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the
Bonds with DTC.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City
will pay for the services of the registrar.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on February 1, 2009, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or.
after February 1, 2010. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the -
City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are"
called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be
prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to
be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in
such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. The proceeds will be used to finance
the acquisition and betterment of a fire station, fire equipment, and apparatus for the City.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $3,540,000 (Par) and accrued interest on the total principal
amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in
the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $35,400,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany the proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must
identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the
Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central
Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time,
the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement.
The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will* be deducted at
settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to
comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can
Page 2
EXHIBIT A
be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the
City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date
without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or
1/8 of 1%. There is no limit on the interest rate spread if quoted in ascending order; however,
no rate for any maturity shall be more than 1.0% lower than any prior rate. Bonds of the same
maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No
conditional proposals will be accepted.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of
matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals
without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply
with the terms herein.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of.
the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of
insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received av*
rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating
agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bonds nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the
purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of
Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no-
litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal,
or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later
than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds
shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be
liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance
with said terms for payment.
Page 3
EXHIBIT A
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
On the date of actual issuance and delivery of the Bonds, the City will execute and deliver a
Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (the "Undertaking ") whereunder the City will covenant for the
benefit of the owners of the Bonds to provide certain financial and other information about the
City and notices of certain occurrences to information repositories as specified in and required
by SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5).
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information
relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official Statement
within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of
the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is
referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place,
Suite 100, Saint Paul,. Minnesota 55101 telephone (651) 223 -3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 140 copies of the,
Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the-
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for•'
purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter.
Any underwriter' delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its
proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a
contractual - relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring
the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated May 8, 2000 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
s/ Karen Guilfoile
City Clerk
4/24/00 3:14 PM
Page 4
AGENDA REPORT
Item # K 3
to: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager Action by Council
from: Colleen J. Callahan, Community Oriented Services C Date
subject: Charitable Gambling Requests for 2001 Endorsed
date: April 21, 2000 Modified
Rejected
INTRODUCTION
In December 1998 the City Council approved a revised process for reviewing nd approving Charitablegppg
Gambling Requests. The new guidelines were established to coincide with the budget process. All requests
must be submitted by April 15 of each year for the following years allocations.
BACKGROUNn
Each request is evaluated based on its overall city wide benefit. Funds are generally distributed for projects,
equipment or activities that are based in the community and which primarily benefit City residents. Receipt of
funds one year does not automatically guarantee continued funding In subsequent years. Projects which involve
the purchase of equipment, supplies or specific items will be looked upon more favorably than requests for
salaries or general operating costs. All funds are required to. be expended for the requested project within one
year of the date of receipt of the funds from the City.
The City of Maplewood grants funds from lawful gambling profits to support City- related activities. The first
priority in the granting of funds will be given to the City of Maplewood Organizations. The second priority or
consideration will be given to funding requests from other organizations which are used for City- related
purposes.
The following is a listing of the organizations and groups who have submitted requests for charitable
contributions:
1.Non Profit / 501c3 Room Rentals at the MCC 25,000.00
2.Mid Summer Night Celebrations (23)18
3.July 4th Fireworks 10,000.00
4.National Night Out 7
5.Red Cross Blood Drive at MCC 450.00
6.Maplewood Law Enforcement Explorers 1,000.00
7.Ramsey County Fair Fireworks .7
8.Moms Club of Maplewood - North 300.00
9.Senior Recovery Program 3,750.00
10.Dispute Resolution 2
Total Amount Requested
Total Amount Available
Remaining Funds
75,
77,955.00
2,955.00
RECOMMENDATION
All of the requests meet the basic requirements established by the City Council. Each of them benefit the city to
varying degrees. There are ample funds to fund each of the requests as they stand; however, it is up to the City
Council to determine which of the requests will be funded and to what degree.
City of Maplewood
Request to Spend Charitable Gambling Funds
Information
Name of organization requesting funds Phone Number
and %%abort err
WNW Ste"
2100 At Pear awAm. Maplwood MbWAota 109
06A Type oaf Ogganzzatim Making 'Request:
xeds County SakootDistriet Nd.
Non- proft please atuak proof of 501 es status
Odw (specify)
r"M - Ugoauatraft c:oatant FOSOft Pasittoa -
Pauft
L"Ofd ase uest
The abownamad organization. requests (awfit gamb(ing profits for tke 464bwiltg purpose:
Gift e"dam - sheets if hems . Amount Requested $25,000,00
TI". + a+ wo*U Vie,. unitw. wok Imim, mu- .
roar C riors:; a.....wde: fog fey row.
wi.. mviowa t t e aM, . orc the skeet, v'.
t6 vmPftwo& wdu ai thou. a.j, s,
J • • Outline how pr*d meets guidelines established. by City Co j*A on awards from, Fw4
Smistrte. - i1 and,
e Q They '` Qf thy. Si,ftte` 6asd er Vie:
By Completing and -Sig" this form, the otganizatim midi ms that the requested. funds wd be spent for 6w&L purpose. This . request expires
one gear frm the date behm.
Tills Data
do/ a. trc, e- -200E
iwt NaRe.
1p S , :&s
a
I
City or County Annual Report, 10% Contribution Fund - LG510, Instructions 8198
Report Req aged
As authorized by Minnesota Statutes, section 349.213,
subdivision 1(a), a statutory or home rule city or county
has the authority to adopt an ordinance requiring that
organizations contribute ten percent of their net profits
derived from lawful gambling conducted at premises within
the city's or county's jurisdiction to a fund administered
and regulated by the responsible local unit of government
without cost to such fund, for disbursement try the
responsible local unit of government of the receipts for (i)
lawful purposes, or (ii) police, fire, and other emergency or
public safety- related services, equipment, and training,
excluding pension obligations.
A city or county must by March 15 of each year file a report
with the Board, on a form the Board prescribes, that lists
all such revenues collected and expenditures for the
previous calendar year.
Financial Information, 10% Contribution F
Fiil in the calendar year for which this report isteing
completed.
and
a. The beginning of year fund balance must equal your
end -of -year fund balance from the prior year.
b. Fill in the total amount collected during the year from601
all organizations.
c. Add lines a and b.
d. Fill in the total amount of lawful expenditures made
from the fund.
e.' Subtract line d from line c. If you have a positive fund
balance, give a brief explanation of why the balance
rill be maintained. '
Indicate the percentage rate being imposed. The rate
cannot exceed ten percent of net profits. Net profits
are gross profits less amounts expended for
allowable expenses and paid in taxes assessed on
lawful gambling. 61
1 -
Expenditures
All gambling expenditures from the fund must be for: , The chart below briefly outlines the codes and lawful
lawful purposes authorized by statute, or purpose xpenditures (contributions) that are allowed. If
amounts allocated to a city or county for police, • need additional information, refer to Minnesota
fire, and other emergency or public safety - related Statutes, section 349.12, subd. 25.
services, equipment, and training, excluding A contribution may not be made to an organization licensedpensionobligations. M to conduct lawful gambling that contributed to the fund.
A 2
to 501 c 3 or a r ::_9 n a 0 •
n •
relie h v'v n - # e ff f • • o e •e ec s .o rtytP trea of:t t'
t 1 _0:50 c 4 e vfs 1 rSao am zatro s :
i•i
r'.homelessn.ss or h srcal o mental:::: ' :.::del •a ed' osttraumatc .stress
ndt"'r rdsabrlty•fsom ..Y.
rv : n•e : mblrcomusa 9`P 9 .
A-4 A -5 A -6
funding a public or private nonprofit a scholarship fund recognition of humanitarian or military
education institution registered with or service
accredited by Minnesota or any other
state
t•. :i. i•.
i7 .s A A 9
yr outctfisanfa1 `s be 'e tin h•e d ca rte n 9 a :•:o itt cablPP a : ::''t ica l,.o Pnat
tunde92
i
t.
expenditures for police, fire, and other to a nonprofit organization which is a not applicable
emergency or public safety- related church or a body of communicants
services, equipment, and training
A 3••n
ro
A 1 4 :, ::
wridbfe _ mana • • erraent•9. P. ectthat costs - 'rei . aunta ri=':at med •to rooni• .and9 . ..n nucoriductr #ntronal. ro rams food9. .P 9
benefits:ttie :° ublic- at =lar a rovided:.P 9 ,.p
9
in snowmobile traits:that:are: rant = ins:::9 9 shelves :and coil re ate diniri9. 9 9
that .the. Qe ' artment: of Natural ':::. °P.aid trails; or other trails: o to publicP.programs:: martly for. persons who
Resources* rt: before•tfie.:use':provided'that the. commissioner of :
I...• •
are:age'.62 :or: older or disabled
dr sxenureter made.P na u etrarehsortuvds•:h s: .a ecearo
r b s ma e .*.ex end tureb f morert
Certification • Have the person who is responsible for the fund and the preparer of the report sign and date the
report.
Include the name and phone number of a contac person.
INTEROFFICE MEMORAND UM
To: Bruce Anderson
From: Dan Faust
Date: March 16,1999
Subject: MCC ROOM RENTALSPAID BY CHARITABLE GAMBLING MONIES
This is to confirm the new policies and procedures on the payment of MCC room
rentals by charitable gambling monies which we discussed with the City Manager
and City Attorney today. The key. points are as follows:
1. Each request for a free room rental will be reviewed by your staff to
determine if the request can be financed by charitable gambling. The eligible
lawful purposes are listed on the attachment with codes (A -1 through A -7 5). If
the request is eligible and suffigie,nt charitable gambling money is available,
then your staff will write the appropriate code (from the attachment) on the
upper right comer of the Facility Resetva tion Contract form. To determine if
there is sufficient charitable gambling money available, check account
205 - 000 - 000 -4530 in BARS. w
ry
2. Monthly these Facility Reservation Contract forms will be send to Carole
Anderson in the Finance Department. She will prepare a monthly journal
entry to charge the Charitable Gambling Fund and credit the Community
Center Fund for the approved free room rentals.
r
3. If the request is eligible but no charitable gambling money is available,
then the room rental fee will be waived. Your staff will write the appropriate
code (from the attachment) on the upper right comer of the Facility
Reservation Contract form and also write FEE WAIVED'DUE TO LACK OF
CHARITABLE GAMBLING MONIES. These forms will be kept by your
department.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
C: Mike McGuire
Gayle Bauman
Carole Anderson
City of Maplewood
Request to Spend Charitable Gambling Funds
Information
Name of organization requesting funds Phone Number
Maplewood Parks and Recreation 651 770 -4572
Address City State Zip
1830 E. County Road B Maplewood MN 55109
Check Type of Organization Making Request:
City o County o School District No.
13 Non - Profit
o Other (specify)
please attach proof of 501c3 status)
Print - Organization Contact Person Position
Doug Taubman
Law ul Purpose Request
The above -named organization requests lawful gambling profits for the following purpose:
r M1Explainexpenditure - attach additional sheets if necessa Amount Requested $18, 500
These funds will be used to offset the expenses of providing 23 Mid Summer Night Celebrations.
Each year approximately 1400 adults and children participate in these events which are held at 23 neighborhood
parks. Activities include music, face painting, games and relays, and an opportunity for neighbors to become
acquainted at their neighborhood park. In addition, other city departments use these events to give residents an
opportunity to meet with city staff and to find out what is-goinE on in their neighborhood in areas such as
neighborhood development, public works projects and public safety.
Justi lcation — Outline how project meets guidelines established by City Council on Awards from Fund.
City wide celebrations held in neighborhood parks benefiting youth and families.
By Completing and signing this form, the organization confirms that the requested funds will be spent for a lawful purpose. This
request expires one year from the date below.
Signature Title Date
Recreation Program Coordinator Aril 13, 2000
Print Name
Doug Taubman
revised 12/98 - chargam.frm
City of Maplewood
Request to Spend Charitable Gambling Funds
Information
Name of organization requesting funds Phone Number
Maplewood Parks and Recreation 650 770 4572
Address City State Zip
1830 E. County Road B Maplewood MN 55109
Check Type of Organization Making Request:
City o County o School District No.
o Non - Profit please attach proof of 501 c3 status)
o Other (specify)
Print - Organization Contact Person Position
Doug Taubman
Lawful Purpose Request
The above -named organization requests lawful gambling profits for the following purpose:
Explain expenditure - attach additional sheets if necessary. Amount Requested $10,000
These funds will be used to pay for the fireworks at the July 4th celebration. Each year we have approximately
20,000 people enjoy our fireworks display. In addition, several thousand participate in the afternoon events
at Hazelwood Park which precede the fireworks.
Justi ication — Outline how project meets guidelines established by City Council on Awards from Fund.
City wide celebration benefiting the residents of Maplewood - Activities are family and youth oriented
By Completing and signing this form, the organization confirms that the requested funds will be spent for a lawful purpose. This
request expires one year from the date below.
Si nature Title Date
Recreation Program Coordinator Aril 13, 2000
Print Name
Doug Taubman
revised 12/98 - chargam.frm
City of Maplewood
Request to Spend Charitable Gambling Funds
Information
Name of organization requesting funds Phone Number
City of Maplewood 651 770 -4579
Address City State Zip
1830 East County Road B Maplewood MN 55.109
Check Type of Organization Making Request:
X City a County O School District No.
Non -Profit (please attach proof of 501 c3 status)
Other (specify)
Print - Organization Contact Person Position
Lawful Purpose Request ,
The above -named organization requests lawful gambling profits for the following purpose:
Explain expenditure -attach additional sheets if necessary.
Amount Requested $ 7,000.00
These funds will be used to fund our City Celebration "National Night Out - Maplewood Style 2001.
They are used to pay for extra tents, toilets, special events, performers, materials for city booths, free hand outs
t- shirts,- citizen award plaques, and all promotional and si na a materials.
Justi ication — Outline how project meets guidelines established by City Council on Awards from Fund.
f A mimi nil sri-n»nc aXri -
eat opportunity to see what Maplewood has to offer. Departments are heavily involved with demonstrations
and educational information is available on all types of city services. Community building, and stren thenin .
By Completing and signing this form, the organization confirms that the requested funds will be spent for a lawful purpose. This
request expires one year m the date below.
Signature Title Date
Community Oriented Services Coordinator 4/7/00
Print Name
Colleen J. Callahan
revised 12/98 - chargam.frm
04 /04 /00 10:01 FAX 2916733
04/03/0Q 13:20 ID:MAPLEWOOD MFD FAX:77045Q0
City of Maplewood
Request to Spend Charitable Gambling Funds
Hulls Uf n Y W=N*" 1Midr
ross
r
iO3
PAGE 2
651 ) 291 -4600
100 SoLth Robert Street. St. Paul MN 55107-1489
cii" '1'w a (wgmizotian Mgking R. vent:
uCuy r I curdy v &heal PWrW Nom.
XIX Nuv- Prnl'k
R
U Odur AP9109Y .
100.4me memo Its.
AeY! • t'MdAd Pnsuw
Lfl_w ut f Request
111 604 - "amcd nrSxti ?i1NYqi roquaft 1041 #en!*linrprAi 1111 The fullowW11 P )gzi
f:x 1Ain ux pandilviry - at yuh eddilinna ollttsfm ifWjog,gS . Amount Requestedn q sled 5450.00
W-i-th FICAdriisnowheldthreetiiriesaYearand •Y has . accounted far almost 600 pi this s 1ari.At each blood drive the Red Cross arralig for drink and f „
i
food at their " canteen. " The.canteen is established to provide donors wi nouri shM__e t of ter i r
0
the donat•on. TheComminityCenterhasestablishedapolicyofnof - .y ao! being brought, r to the CommuniCenter. Fnod arrangements must be made through the cat i •g er ng ser v ce a t the MCC. ThiTisacosttheRedCrossinotequipedtoencumber .They general are prov1 ded withonatiorteircanteen. n - 9, wo CanteenartregquestinguningtheRedCrosswith . charitable gdmbl t ng funds, The Red Cross traveli group •g u p sets t p and coord i na to stheblooddrive. They will Conti ttWe #' provide support vol unte rPe people to host thecanteen. However, to be in compliance with Co Center of i Cp y and ease the costburden, we respectfully request Maple' Chari tabs a Gambl • n do _
NNNW
Cover e coS o e cash 'een, ace
3 11 ars be a 11 ocatpd to
er , 1 oqd drive.s a memo tau l n ng an es imd e o e Cos •sJUS CQ1lJi - lluilin ,at tPn4 • tiukrlmc a ti1 Istt-1 hs City 014hidl un Awar& 1taw Fundl.
i ,-t- 5010., 2.rga .. i i ?at Ion
2. Funds would be used to purchase materials to su ort the 1 •
ewao AP ' blood drive activitiesv t. e s i hMap]
3 These activitt.§ benef it of onl the City residentsdents 1 t our l a t r t h 1 e.4. All funds will be expended durinq the 2000 calondar ear.Y 1 ood dr i v o s are h o l d inFebruary, September and Docember annually.,
I V Coinplefing And signing lhi*s fnrnl, the twp4livaliun umifinfix thni the ra uct , . .
expiuux' erns year fmin iho dais: bc1ovS. I a
ud ftusd will W. xittt far N lawfulut jtrlw. 111 tK yuyt
Wwiwd
r -*-k-
fdio
szl.
reviaol 120M - diargons,ftns
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike Ericson
FROM: Bill Priebe
SUBJECT: Bloodmobile Funding for 2001
DATE: March 31, 2000
Attached please find the request for charitable gambling funds to provide monies for
upcoming Red Cross bloodmobile canteens.. The dates in 2001 are February 16,
August 31 and December 21 —all on Friday. Please process this at your convenience
and provide a verification letter if and when the funds are approved.
FOOD AND BEVERAGE ESTIMATE
1 gallon coffee .@ $15/gal. $15.00
40 cans of pop @ $0.91/can 36.40
40 cans of juice @ $1.06 /can 42.40
5 dozen cookies @ $8.40 /doz. 42.00
20 bags of chips @ $0.50 /bag 10.
3 bloodmobiles
145.80
450.00
City of Maplewood
Request to Spend Charitable Gambling Funds
Information
Name of organization requesting funds Phone Number
Maplewood Police Explorers 651 770 -4532
Address City State Zip
1830 East County Road B Maplewood MN 55109
Check Type of Organization Making Request:
X City County School District No.
Non - Profit please attach proof of 501 c3 status)
Other (specify)
Print - Organization Contact Person Position
Lawful Purpose Request
The above -named organization requests lawful gambling profits for the following purpose:
Amount Requested $ 1,000.00
Explain expenditure - attach additional sheets if necessary.
The funds will be utilized to subsidize dollars allocated from last year to send Maplewood Ex lorers to the
Annual Conference and competition.
The cost of sending these youth to the program exceed the dollars allocated from last year. In addition to the
1,000.00 request we are also requesting acarry -over from the 2000 allocations of $5,000.00 to cover the costs
of sending these youth and their chaperones to the conference for 2001:
As part of their activities at the conference, the Explorers participate in state and national competitions with
Explorer groups sponsored by other law enforcement agencies. The funds would be used to help send the
explorers to these Competitions. These competitions offer the Ex lorers an opportunity to obtain scholarshi s
for college.
Justi ication — Outline how project meets guidelines established by City Council on Awards from Fund.
The Maplewood Police Explorers is a group of high-school aged students that belong to the Explorer Post
nnncnred by the A gn1P «land Police Denartmp,nt Tn hP.Jnnain2 to this Pnct flip, Fxnlnrem, artivelu narticinatP
and learn about law enforcement as a career. The advisors are Maplewood police officers that have taken an
interest in teaching these students about law enforcement.
In addition, these Explorers volunteer their time and assist in several city-sponsored activities, such as annual
auction, Ni ht Out Celebration, Ramsey County Fair and the July 4th activities.
By Completing and signing this form, the organization confirms that the requested funds will be spent for a lawful purpose. This
request expires one year from the date below.
Signature Title Date
1ajCatainA15 2000
Print Name
Michael P. Ryan
revised 12/98 - chargam.frm
City of Maplewood
Request to Spend Charitable Gambling Funds
Information
Name of organization requesting funds Phone Number
Ramsey County Fair Board 651 777 -6514
Address City State Zip
Myrtle Street Maplewood MN 55109
Check Type of Organization Making Request:
City X County School District No.
X Non - Profit 501 c3 please attach proof of 501 c3 status)
Other (specify)
Print - Organization Contact Person Position
Joe Fox Fair Manager / Secreta
Lawful Purpose Request
The above named organization requests lawful gambling profits for the following purpose:
Amount Requested $ 7,000
Explain expenditure - attach additional sheets if necessary.
Dollars would be used to fund the Ramsey County Fair Fireworks display for 2001. The Ramsey County Fair is
a community celebration The Ramsey County Fair is a free fair and has grown in community support and
attendance over the last few years. Last year there were approximately 35,000 people that attended the fair.
Justi lcation — Outline how project meets guidelines established by City Council on Awards from Fund.
5 01 c3 Status
Community' Based - Grass Roots Event. Highly attended by Maplewood citizens.
Family and Youth Focus.
By Completing and signing this form, the organization confirms that the requested funds will be spent for a lawful purpose. This
request expires one year from the date below.
Signature.- Title Date
Fair Manager / Secretary Aril 11 2000
Print Name
Joe Fox
revised 12/98 - chargam.frm
City of Maplewood
Request to Spend Charitable Gambling Funds
In ormation
Name of o%anization requesting funds Phone Number
Address City state Zip
nQ(kGS: '
A
I _SS Isa
Check Type of Organization Making Request:
City County o School District No.
An OuL (please a chattach proof of 5O10 status)
Other asp
runt c49anization contact Person Position
Lawful Pomose Request
Tue above-named owmimtion requests iawail gambting profas for the xollowing purpose:
Explain expenditure - attach additional sheets if necessary Amount Requested $(
Justification outline how project, meets guidelines established by City Council on Awards from Fund
AaPt'\ 'i V-\ Oft 4LV- 2 P\ C, L Le L 2C±A tl i S
iaLf!kL c S ._ ",qe
By Co leting and si g this form, the organization confmms that the requested Am& will be spent for a lawful purpose. This request
exp' ne froVth ate below.Wt-/ ] 1WsignaturodeDate
Print Name
revised 12/98 - c hargam.frm
Internal Revenue Service
District Director
P 0 BED's' 38003 STOI 5. : - •.4 -4b
IN FRN'iCI5r0, CA 941 Ci :
Department of the Treasury
Idmt i f r cation Number:
77-•01256*!-31
Date: FEB. 20, 1 -x3G I "ase bmber I.
959 X54016
MGMS G..W Contact Person:
814 i"ol*f CIWLE DAN [EL STEVENS
5 IMI V11 LEY, CA SO065 Contact Te I epjvne Number
415) 556-4319
tlar Letter Oat -ed:
Dec. 9, 1E%
rspddendem App I i es: ' •
No
Dear AFB I i cant:
Th i s mod i f i es our l e tt e r of the above date i n Nh i ch we stated that Y ouWouldbe. treated as an organization which is not' a pr i gate foundation until
tine expiration of your adv ruling period,
Your exempt status under section 5014a) of the Internal Revenue Code as an
organ i .-.-at i on descr i tied i n sect i on 501 (c) (3) i s st r I I i n of feet. Based on the
i oforrn'r t ion You sLbm i tL•ed, me have deto i ned that you are prat a R r i vatofoundatwithintherx2aningofsection5034a) of the code becaccse you are anorgani ;:at i on of tt•re t o descr abed i aYpnsecticns5J9ta, X11 and
170 (b) 1) (A) %vi y
Grantors and contr may r e l y on this deterrr i nat i on un I ess theIntarr« l Relev nu e r rw r e' pub I i shes no i ce to the contra , However, i .F cAjYIoseycoirsecti509(a) (1) states, a grantor or contributor manotrell,•• on this rieternr nation if he or s wasas r n part eespans i b I for, or was .
amare of thc:s act or f a Lure to act, or the substantial or material change on -the part of the argan i ..:at i on that resulted in yraar• I os ,of .re} status or ifheor !:-he acqui rd.i knowledge that the [nterna I Revenue Service had iven noticethatyoHouIdnoIorrr ± r be c l a ss i f i ed a s s sect i
9
a on 509 (a) Q )
organizations
As of Janraar•.r 1, L984, VOL) a r•e 1 t ab 1 e For taxes under the Fedora I
Insurance Contr r bc.rt: i ary -: Act (soc 5e i ty taxes) on remuneration of sl0o
or mores. you pay to each of Your eap I oyc.*?s dur i ng a calendar year. You are
not liable for tie• tax imposed under the Federal Unerip I oy rtent Tax Act (FUTA) .
You are regpa red - to f i I Forn 990 onI if our gross rYYJs ecerpts each yeararenormallmorethan $25 For gU r dence in detern i n i ng whether Y coar grossreceipLsare "norm I I y" more than $Z5,000, see the instruct ions for Forn 990.,Yf a return i s r".quired, i t nust be f i led bs the 15th day of the f fifth month
After L•I er,d of your . innua i account i N period. A pena of sla a day is
charged when a reLur n is f r I end I a Le, un I ess there r s rerasonab I e cause for th
de i air . HeW `•, e r , the i nun pens I ty charged cannot o :+c eed V5 or 5 percentOFyourgrossr•et::j:: For W year, Hhchever is This penalty r • alsopeYbechargediarr•tur•n is nevi: complete, so please bere .sure yrxir return is
2—
moms G.U8
camp I eb- beFcsre ysziu f i I e i t-0
If He have indicated. in the head ir of this letter that an addendLn
app ies, the addardum enclosa-t%.d is an inte part of this letter.,
F=cause this lett2r could hal'P'r&solve an questions about • your priyatefoundationstatus., :please keep it in your permanent records
I f you ha %,ko- ;.:i n qLk=.StiOrrS please contact the perso*n whose name arod,telepth:irie number are shown above.
S i ncere I y ycxirs
Michael J. Quirn
District Director
City of Maplewood APR 10 2nvoRequesttoSpendCharitableGamblingFunds
IaPormalion
Name of acganizaoon t
Phone Number
Senior Re over ProgramAdd="
Ow zip
1351 Frost Avenue Maplewood M C c, An
Chec* Type of OWnization Making Request:
OC4 o Co"y o School District No.
f Nan -Profit
please attach proof of 501c3 status)
o Other (SPOC4)
rwvan
Thomas S. Gerenz Assistant Director
Lawful geguest
the abov"amed orpnization requests lawful gambling profits fc* the-following purpose; s -
Explain ex diture - attach additional sheets if necessary. RequestedAmountRuested $ 3 75 4 0
The Senior,Recovery Pro ram has worked
seniors who are chemically dependent /alcoholics for the last 25 ears. We worYk both in the
areas of sea me a d support grou2s OV a xcar ' s t •
Many of these individuals live in Ma lewood. We haveve been located in Maplewood for the
past t yCars and-have rec moved ro a new location agrai Maplpwnnlocationhaslesssquarefootagethanourrevious .loP cation. This has created a serious
need to make better use of s ace .. e. e ' 11 'wh this Wareinneedofcabinets, a combination of both free standing nd wall hangingggng varieties.
In contacting com anies an estimated figure f cabandtheirinstallationwhereneeded. A ' second need is the re lacement ofYP thirty plastic
ch-aija with Dadded chairs. The Dlagtic h ol and the t jZe1dq (that- Make 11pthesupportsystem) are breaking on a regular basis. In addition both the designed shape
and the fact that the sitting.gurface ia_ 121astir. makes them very Unr-Qmf ortabl P_ for thp.senior population we serve. (See attached
JusdjlCQtlon - Outline how projea rr ms guidelines established by City ouncil on Awards &oinY Fund
In looking at the guidelines sent to us by Mike Erickson, per our re ues t to ColleenDirkswaget, the justif ication for our request is as follows. We are located in Maplewood.
We are requesting-funds for a specific a ui ment need u di elines 2 & &.A By the nature ofthisrequest, we understand this will be a one time only istributionY (guideline 3) . We
understand that the funds must be used for the re nested prpj ect within one ear of thedateofreceiptoffunds (guideline 5) . We received permission from Michael A. McGuire,
CA Manager, to make this re uest uideline 6). We are not an athletic organizationguideline7.) . We provide an important service for senior citizens •in Maplewood (guideline 8).
By Completing and signing this fonn, the organ confii ms tha8 t the requested funds will be spent for a lawful purpose, This requesteh - pores one year from thedat ' below.
Print Name
ire
Assistant Director 4 -7 - 00
Thomas S. Gerenz
mued 1248 chargam.fitn
SENIOR RECOVERY PROGRAM
1351 Frost Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55109
651) 773 -0473 Fax (651) 773 -9298
Expenditure Explanation Continued
In fact, there are times when these chairs are not an option for some of the
participants due to their physical problems. An estimated figure of $1750.00 was
arrived at for the replacement of the thirty chairs. By combining the estimated costs
to address both of these needs, we have arrived at the . figure of $3,750.00 which we
are requesting. We would greatly appreciate your consideration and any help your
are able to give to the participants of our program.
City of Maplewood
Request to Spend Charitable Gambling Funds
In onnafion
Name oforganization regnesft Binds Dispute Resolution Center
974 West 7" Street
5t. Paul, MN 55102 .651- 292 -7791
Check Type of (?Winn ice Making Request:
Cray C3 Cry CI School District No.
Nate- }rofrt
Pie= 3ftch Proof of-50 I c:3 stanis
C3 Other (specify)
hint orgulimatio
r C.S
Foshan.
Lmyful Purpos Reauect
The aboveaamed organization rcquegs Ilawful '=m ling profits for the following purpose:
Explak a enditure - attach additional sheets if neces Amount Requested 2
Dispute Resolution Center is a rivate non-pro • , , p . community mediation program founded xn •1982 to provide mediation, facilitation, training; and referral services in the East M •Cities. The Center is one of six communi _based
etro area of the Twin
ty mediation resources in the state of Minnesota and theonlyoviderolowcostectivemediationservicesintheEastMetroareaoheTwinCities.
r
Dispute Resolution Center is .a Certified Community Dispute Resolution Program •administered the Supreme C
p under the guidelinesbypCourtWereceivereferralsfromneighborhoodgroupsandblockschoolssocial `
bh p ock clubs,cial service providers, cit atrations, courts, police de artments and ovagencies.p g ernment
Our pri3mary service is mediation and Dispute Resolution Center handles between 500 to 550casesonaverageeachyear, assisting approximately 2,000 individuals to effectively esolve disputeslearneffectivecommunicationskills. As a commuru Y P and
t resource, the Centex provides an affordable,accessible opportunity for individuals, f ' 'es communi ou s, government aty p g gencies, andbusinessestoresolveconflictNooneiseverdeniedservicesforinab ` ' to a .v t R.
see additional attached information]
luSdficakon " As the only low cost urovider of mediation services and education designed to teach effectiveconflictresolutionskillsDspnteResolutionCenterhasassistedanumber. of residents and cityadministrationstoresolvemattersthatmightotherwisehaveescalatedintoviolenceorresultedin costly -litigation During 1999 and the fast quarter of 2000 we assisted agproxL*•+te1p 20 residents ofMaplewoodtoresolveconflictrelatedtotheirrelationshipaslandlordandtenant, neighborhoodissuesconcerningnoiseemtoentdisutes , bnsmes consumer issues and famil matters relatedtovisitationandcoaununication. Mediation strengthens and builds community relationships byprovidinganopporhaiityforcosmmazitymemberstoresolvedifferencesrespectfullyandlearnself-sufficiency in handlinS,luture conflicts. As a resource to the city administrators, we provide analternativetothemany: hours of staff and police time spent attending {
parking
et tb i g . disputes involving neighborrelationships, ordinance violations, azlan and noise. [see additional attached information]Bp Completing and signing this form, the organization confums that the requested funds will be spent for a lawful purpose. This requestex'Pmes one year from the date below_ .
A — \t CEO
Mdnanie
revised 12 /99 - dharg=n f=
Lawful Purpose Request _ ontinuedl:
A majority of the individuals served by the Center are people in lower income ranges.
Through the use of constructive means like mediation and facilitation, we provide an
alternative to courts and the need for costly litigation and assist with disputes before they result
in an escalation to the point of violence. We assist people. to resolve a variety of issues
including:
matters of public safety concerning traffic or parking
landlord/ tenant concerns such as repairs, noise or nonpayment of rent
consumer - merchant disputes about payment or dissatisfaction with goods or services
neighborhood conflicts around noise, pets, or property lines
small claims concerning money, property damage. or breach of contract
post- divorce family issues such as parenting schedules and communication.
We strive to provide quality services that fulfill our mission:
Dispute Resolution Center promotes the constructive resolution
of conflict through open communication
and shared decision - making.
At Dispute Resolution Center, we believe that people can resolve disputes respectfully,
without litigation, to the mutual satisfaction of all parties.
We advocate for managing disputes peacefully through the use of problem - solving
techniques that help build strong feelings of community.
We are committed to providing the highest quality services that are accessible to all
residents of the communities we serve.
We partner with other community members, groups, schools and businesses to develop
and maintain an open organization that reflects diversity and welcomes all people.
We promote the peaceful resolution conflict as a preferred method of building healthy
communities and reaching mutual goals.
Studies have demonstrated that agreements reached in mediation are followed more
often than those settlements or solutions imposed by a third party. Participants report more
satisfaction with their agreements and believe that the process of mediation improved their
relationship with the other party and opened the door to better communication in the future.
In addition to mediation, Dispute Resolution Center provides workshops and
educational presentations on conflict resolution and communication to community .groups
and organizations such as schools, colleges, landlord or tenant unions, community councils or
block clubs, Youch centers, and other audiences. These trainings build the capacity within
neighborhoods, f ' 'es and other relationships to peacefully address future conflicts. The
Center encourages people to consider the full range of options when confronted with difficult
situations, and to realize that violence is never an appropriate response. Mediation confers
both respect responsibilityectandresonsib' ' on all parties in a conflict. In 1999, our trainers provided
education to approximately 2,000 participants to assist them in handling uture conflictg and
lessen the likelihood they will resort to violence as a means of resolving diutes.
Our Community Restorative Justice Program was established in 1998 through a
collaboration with the Summit - University Planning Council. Through referrals from policegpdepartments, courts, youth services and community groups, approximatel f communiY y tyvolunteersassistvictims, offenders, and community members to address the impact of crim intheirneighborhoodsanddetermineappropriaterestitutionfortheharmdonetoothers.
To accomplish our goals of fostering open communication and encouragin positivegp
responses to conflict in all neighborhoods in the East Metro area, the Dispute Resolution Center
recruits and trains a diverse group of volunteer mediators who are trained in conflict,
communication and the mediation process. A mediator must relate well to the artici ants
both t p poearntheirtrustaswellastounderstandtheirlanguageandculture. The Center now
benefits from a diverse group of over sixty volunteers =- doctors, full-tune arents,. lawyers, busdrivep -
e s, students, retirees — who represent a broad cross- section of the com nunity. In 1999
alone, Dispute Resolution Centers volunteers contributed approximately 1,500 volunteer hoursofservicetotheCenterasmediators, trailers, and board members.
Another important aspect of our services is to redirect callers to other communitY
resources as an alternative, or in addition to, our services. We provide this information to
approximately 500 -600 callers. each year who are seeking an appropriate resolution of their
problems or concerns.
Our Center is funded through grants and contracts from the State of Minnesota, RamseCounty, the City of St. Paul and surrounding municipalities, contributions from businesses,
corporate giving programs, individuals and churches, private foundations and income received
from mediation and training services. Through continued support and increased outreach
efforts, we hope to increase our capacity to provide low cost, effective mediation, fac' ' tation
training and referral services to residents of the communities we serve.
Jus ' 'cation (continued):
Our services. are provided through the generous efforts of approximately 75 communityvolunteerswhoarerecruitedandtrainedbyourCentertoassistresidentsofthecommunities
we serve. Mediation and education about conflict encourage residents to explore opportunities
for resolution that is satisfactory to all concerned. This fosters an atmosphere of safety, respect
and peace among community members that does not exist when more adversarial options areusedtoresolvedisputes. ,
We are able to provide our low cost, effective services to the community -at -large
through the generous contributions of municipalities such as Maplewood We request a
contribution in the amount of $2,000 for the fiscal year 2001 to support our ongoing work and
availability in your community.
AGENDA ITEM K`t
AGENDA REPORT
0TOO Ken Haider, Actin Cit Mana
9FROM* Colleen J. Callahan, COS Coordinator
RE: Intersection of 120, Jo and Hadle
DATE: April 24,12000
INTRODUCTION
Action b Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Re
Durin a Public Meetin surroundin Jo Park, citizens su placin a stop li at the
intersection of 120,, Jo and Hadle
BACKGROUND
The Cit of Maplewood has no specific jurisdiction in handlin traffic si or control measures
at this intersection. The responsibilit falls to the Cit of Oakdale, Ramse Count and the MN
Department of Transportation. In speakin with representatives from each of the entities I have
discovered that both the Cit of Oakdale and NIN DOT have taken some measures to re for
this addition. The Cit of Oakdale has placed this item in their Capitol Improvement p to
happen some time in 2000. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has scheduled a
channelization of traffic to occur in Februar of 2002.
Ramse Count will be prepared to support a movement b the Department of Transportation if
and when the choose to move forward with addin a stop li at the above mentioned
intersection.
There has been a lot of development and increased traffic over the last couple of years. This
development appears to be continuin includin a lar multi-theater complex which Will open
soon.
RECOMMENDATION
Due to the increased development, traffic and citizen concerns it is recommended that the
Maplewood Cit Council re the MN Department of Transportation to construct a si
s at the intersection of 120, Jo and Hadle as soon as possible.
AGENDA ITEM KS
AGENDA REPORT Action b Council
Date
TO: City gMang e r Endorsed
Modified
RejectedFROM: AssCityEngineer
SUBJECT: Maplewood Pavement Management Policy Assessment Rate Update
DATE: May 1, 2000
The Maplewood Pavement Management Policy has established set assessment rates
based on the type of improvement procedure proposed for a given project. Assess-
ment rates were established to cover approximately 50 % of the cost of improvements
on the local streets and less on the state aid (MSA) streets.
The policy, established in 1999, calls for the assessment rate, to be adjusted by the
construction cost index for the previous year.. As we will begin meeting shortly with next
year's neighborhoods, these rates would be established for the 2001 construction
season. From 1999 to 2000, the construction cost index* increased by 2.17 %. The
adjusted assessment rates would be revised as follows:
Street Improvement Procedure Year of Construction
2000 2001
1.Complete Street Reconstruction (MSA Streets) /unit:4000 4085
2.Partial Reconstruction /unit:3000 3065
3.Reclamation and Overlay (Local Streets) /unit:3800 3880
4.Bituminous Surface Replacement 2100 2145
5.Mill and Overlay /unit:1500 1530
6.Storm Drainage /unit:600 615
Staff recommends that the city council approve updated assessment rates for the
year 2001 construction season as outlined above and in the Maplewood Pavement
Management Policy.
ilN
jc
Construction cost index, as reported by Engineering News Record (ENR).
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Acting City Manager
FROM: City Engineer
SUBJECT: Metricom Antenna Agreement
DATE May 1, 2000 .
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Metricom, a wireless internet company, wishes to locate an antenna system on the
Cope Avenue water tower. The St. Paul Water Board negotiates the lease agreements,
as stipulated between the agreement with the City of Maplewood.
There currently is an irregularity in that Maplewood has not technically transferred
capital assets to the St. Paul Water Board. Because this has not yet been completed,
Metricom is asking for an additional agreement with the City of Maplewood called a
nondisturbance agreement. This protects Metricom during the period of time it takes
Maplewood to transfer the assets to St. Paul. In all other ways this is the normal
agreement concurrence that Maplewood does for all water tower antennas.
It is recommended the city council approve the antenna lease agreement with
Metricom and the nondisturbance agreement that is attached.
KGH
jc
Attachments
APR - 2E - 2000 14: 24 SAINT PAIL WATER UTILITY 651 292 7811 P-01/02
WHEREAS, Lessee desi t to lease cert ain space located at and on the Cope Ave Wat
To' weer, locate. at 1 900 Cope Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota 5511 (the "Cope Towe?' ; and
WHEREAS, The City of Maplewood ( "City") currently owns the Cope Tower and holds fee
simple title to the real estate on which the Cope Tourer is located (the "Real Estate"); and
WHE AS Pursaant to an Agreement dated October 30, 1996, entered into by and between the
Board and the City (the "Transfer Agreement"), City has agreed to convey to the Board all of
city's water facilities and real property rights and interests related to therm includ' hi
of the Cope Tower and fee simple title in the Veal Estate; and
WHE AS, Bow anticipates completing y the conveyance as required in the Transfer
Agreement on or before January 1, 2001, so that after January 1, 2001, Board will own the o ep
Tower and fee simple title to the Real Estate; and
WHEREAS , Lessee desires to enter into this Lease regardless of whether or whenn the or
Board owns the Cope Tower and the Real Estates- - K— d- -t6.pity - h ... adt e' d 'nto, or will enter
i4t , a'1' bn -Dist hence A ems nt wo tablet 'ssee; . .
NOW WHEREFORE, In consideration of the terns and conditions of this Lease, the parties
agree as foll
0
i
APR -2E -2000 14:25 SAINT PAUL WATER UTILITY E51 292 7E i i P.02/02
Ton- Disturbance Agreement
The Parties hereto, Metficoin, Inc. ("Metricore) and the City of Maplewood
C "Maplewood!), for good and sufficient consideration in end paid, hereby agree that the
Site lease Agreement (the ""Agreement") dated between
St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners and Metricom is hereby ratified by Maplewood
as went owner of the Cope Avenue Water Tower and real estate thereto to ted at 1900
Cope Avenue, Maplewood, Mimesota 55119 ( "Ownee% and Maplewood will not as
der, interfere in any way with said Agreement and that the Agreement skull not be,
terminated of extinguished except as provided in said Agreement, for shall the rights and
possession of Metricom thereunder be disturbed.
bawd this day of , 2000.
etrieam inc. City of Maplewood
By. By,
me typed or printed) (ramie wed or printed)
Its:Its:
TOTAL P.02