Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000 02-14 City Council Packet
AMENDED AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, February 14, 2000 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 00 -03 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting 00 -02 (January 24, 2000) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Transfer for Tax Increment Funds 3. Budget Changes for Police Grant 4. Carryover of 1999 Appropriations to 2000 5. Transfer to Close Debt Service Fund for 1979 Bond Issue 6. Temporary Gambling License - American Legion Post 577 7. Approve Annual Renewal of Gambling License - Merrick Companies, Inc. - to operate at The Rock and Garrity's. 8. Approve Annual Renewal of Gambling License - Maplewood Athletic Association - to operate at Gulden' s Roadhouse and The Bird 9. DNR Grant Application 10. Special Inspection and Construction Testing Services - Community Center Addition 11. Maplewood Community Center Change Order No. 1 12. Robert Odegard Donation for the Maplewood Nature Center 13. July 4, 2000 Fireworks Production - Contract 14. Municipal State Aid Advance Encumbrance Resolution 15. Assistant Finance Director and MIS /GIS Technician Compensation 16. Temporary Gambling License - Presentation of BVM Church H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. Tax - Exempt Financing Host Approval Request - Lutheran Social Services 2. 7:10 P.M. Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 7 (West of 2175 Woodlynn Avenue) I. Preliminary Plat 2. Front Setback Variance 3. Design Approval I. AWARD OF BIDS 1. 2. J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. 2. 3. K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Residential Parking Issues 2. B artelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, Project 99 -13, Feasibility Study and Order Public Hearing 3. Personal Service License - Hours of Operation 4. Authorization to Purchase Brick for New Fire Station L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Acting City Manager - Official Vote 2. 3. 4. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. O. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, January 24, 2000 Council Chambers, Municipal Building .Meeting No. 00 -002 A. CALL TO ORDER: A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. C. ROLL CALL: Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 00 -01 (January 10, 2000) as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the Agenda as amended. M1. Public Safety M2. Organized Hauling M3. Maplewood Policing M4. Police Department Drive -Along Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS: None 1 G. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember Koppen moved to approve Consent Agenda Items G1, G3 and G4 as presented and pull the Consent Agenda Item G2 or a separate vote. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 1. Approval of Claims ACCOUNTS PAYAB $6,769.65 Checks #8195 thru #8197 dated 1 -4 thru 1 -6 -00 $119,429.79 Checks #4783 5 thru #47941 dated 1 -11 -00 $154,362.97 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 1 -4 thru 1 -10 -00 $106,958.83 Checks #8198 thru #8205 dated 1 -7 thru 1 -12 -00 $154,857.69 Checks #47944 thru #48058 dated 1 -18 -00 $91,073.59 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 1 -11 thru 1 -18 -00 $633,452.52 PAYROL $309,660.13 $23,516. $333,176. $966,628.71 Total Accounts Payable Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 1 -7 -00 Payroll Deduction check #76301 thru #76308 dated 1 -7 -00 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 3. New Century Final Plat (New Century Boulevard, North of Highwood Avenue) Approved the New Century Final Plat subject to the following: a. A drainage and utility easement for the ponding area. b. A utility easement for the sanitary sewer line between Pinkspire Lane and Century Avenue in the Phylis Avenue alignment. c. The easements for the permanent cul -de -sac at the east end of Schaller Drive. d. An easement for the off -site storm sewer. 2 4. Personal Service License - Individual - Anne G. Mayer Approved a Personal Service Individual License for Anne G. Mayer to be used at Sister Rosalind Gefre's Professional Message Center, Maplewood Community Center. Councilmember Koppen moved to approve Consent Agenda Item G2 as presented. 2. City Manager Resignation Agreement Approved the City Manager resignation agreement. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Allenspach, Koppen and Wasiluk Nays - Councilmember Collins H. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 7:00 P.M. Hazelwood Street Improvements, Project 99 -07 - Public Hearing and Order Improvement a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing. b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. c. Public Works Director Haider explained the procedure for public hearings and presented the specifics of the report. d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Clarence and Donna Gervais, 2420 Hazelwood Street John and Jennifer Simons, 2409 Hazelwood Street Scott and Loretta Pederson, 1573 Sextant Avenue AustinWard, 2555 Hazelwood Avenue Maurice A. Jones, 1456 Magnolia Avenue East Ron Erickson, 2699 Hazelwood Street Gene Lefto, 1763 Barclay Jim Fischer, 1531 Sextant Avenue James Sanders, 2425 Hazelwood Joe Tembreull, 2540 Flandru Street Rick Brandon, 1622 East County Road C Dave Maroushek, 2602 Hazelwood Street Randy and Mary Lynn Mauer, 2596 Hazelwood Street Al and Jean Jeska, 1549 Brooks Avenue Douglas Frid, 2467 Hazelwood Street Maurice A. Jones, 1456 Magnolia Avenue East 3 Ronald Westberg, 2558 Hazelwood Street Michael and Tammy Wilde, 2538 Hazelwood Street Philip Oswald, 1534 County Road C Vincent Wincans, 2546 Hazelwood Street Victor Gebauer, 2554 Hazelwood Street e. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution directing the city engineer to proceed with the final plans for the Hazelwood Street Improvements, Project 99-07, and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION 00 -008 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 1 Oth day 'of January, 2000, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed construction of street and drainage improvements on Hazelwood Street, from Gervais Avenue to County Road C, City Project 99 -07, AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on January 24, 2000, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood construct street and drainage improvements on Hazelwood Street, from Gervais Avenue to County Road C, City Project 99 -07. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the 24th day of January, 2000. 3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of $1,073,300 shall be established. The proposed financing plans is as follows: Assessments $ 310,420 (29.0 %) State aid 746 (69.5 %) Sewer utility fund 16 ( 1.5%) Total $1,073,300 Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - all El 2. 7:10 P.M. Rosoto Senior Housing (Desoto Street and Roselawn Avenue) a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing. b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Milo Thompson presented the Planning Commission Report. e. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings. f. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Greg and Kathy Juenemann, 721 Mount Vernon Avenue Joe and Joan Kolasa, 1855 Desoto Brian Ofallon, 1863 Desoto Tom and Audry Duellman, 1843 Desoto Jeff and Arlene Solum, 1858 Desoto Tom Robey, 4314 Pondview Drive, White Bear Lake Mary Sterlader, 487 Roselawn g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution to change the land use plan from R -1 (single family residential) to RH (residential ig density) the site of the Rosoto senior ousing development on the corner of ose awn venue and DeSoto Street, and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION 00 -009 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Paul Sentman, representing Rosoto Associates, applied for a change to the city's land use plan from R -1 (single dwelling residential) to RH (residential high density). WHEREAS; this change applies to the property on the west side of Desoto Street south of Roselawn Avenue (1915 Desoto Street). WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On December 20, 1999, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the plan amendment, subject to the developer meeting the city's density requirements. 2. On January 24, 2000, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. E NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approved the above - described change for the following reasons: 1. This site is proper for and consistent with the city's policies for high - density residential use. This includes: a. Having a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic, racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should include apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single- family housing, public - assisted housing and low- to moderate - income housing, and rental and owner - occupied housing. b. Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the city. These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs and nontraditional households. c. The city will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and price ranges through its land use plan. d. It is on a collector street and is near an arterial street, parks and open space. 2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. The proposed on -site pond and large setback from the street will separate the senior housing from nearby homes. b. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values. This approval is subject to the developer acquiring a transfer of development rights (TDR) agreement with Saint Jerome's church for enough property to make the project's density no higher than 16 units per gross acre. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on January 24, 2000. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution to approve a conditional use permit for a planned development for the Rosoto sensor ousmg devel opment, an move or 1 ts adoption: -Wmmw� RESOLUTION 00 -010 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Paul Sentman, representing Rosoto Associates, applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for the Rosoto senior housing planned unit development (PUD). WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property on the west side of Desoto Street south of Roselawn Avenue. The legal description is: The East Y2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, except the south 150 feet thereof. no (PIN 17- 29 -22 -32 -0001) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On December 20, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On January 24, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional - use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan date - stamped November 2, 1999. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The project design plans, including architectural and landscaping plans, shall be subject to review 7 and approval of the community design review board (CDRB). 3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council. approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 4. The owner shall not convert this development to non - senior housing without the revision of the planned unit development. For this permit, the city defines senior housing as a residence occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older. 5. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. 6. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day -to -day transportation on the site. If the city decides there are excess parking spaces available on the site, then the city may allow the parking of these on the site. 7. If the city council decides there is not enough on -site parking after the building is 95 percent occupied, the city may require additional parking. 8. The developer shall provide an on -site storm shelter in the apartment building. This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the director of emergency preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population. *9. The developer shall secure a transfer of development rights (TDR) agreement with Saint Jerome's church for enough property to make the housing project's density no higher than 16 units per gross acre. 10. The developer shall install a 5- foot -wide bituminous path or widen the shoulder along the south side of Roselawn Avenue between the proposed sidewalk on the site to the east line of the first driveway on the church property to the west of the site. The developer's engineer shall show the necessary additional bituminous on the grading and construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the details of these plans. 11. The city council shall review this permit in one year. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or a building permit. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on January 24, 2000. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Code Amendment - Liquor License (Second Reading) a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. I b. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Allenspach introduced the following Ordinance (second reading) to change the code to exempt spacing requirements when a church or school proposed wrt in 100 feet of existing on-sale or off-sale iquor establis ents, and move its adopt ORDINANCE NO, 807 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REGULATIONS FOR ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: Section 1. This section adds Section 5 -38(d) as follows (additions are underlined): Section 5 -38. ( c ) No "on- sale" license may be issued under this article for premises located within one hundred (100) feet of a church or school building located in the city, and no "off- sale" license shall be issued for premises located within one hundred (100) feet of a church or school building. The distance is to be measured from the main entrance of the licensed premises to the nearest property line of said church or school. (d)Exemption: The 100 -foot spacing requirement noted in paragraph (c) above shall not apply if the on -sale or off-sale liquor establishment is in operation before the influx o the church or school in the neighborhood or - if the existing establishment proposes to expand t eir facility. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on January 24, 2000. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Allenspach, Collins and Wasiluk Abstain - Councilmember Koppen 2. Code Amendment - Zoning Change - Section 36 -6 (Second Reading) a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the change in the Maplewood Code §36 -6 (second reading) to remove rabbits from the definition of ivestoc . Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Harvester Area Streets, Project 98 -10, Change Orders 1, 2, & 3, Final Payment 9 a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Public Works Director Haider presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Wasiluk introduced the following Resolution directing modification of the existing construction contract and move or its adoption. RESOLUTION 00 -011 DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 98 -10, Harvester Area Neighborhood Street Improvements and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 98 -10, Change Orders 1, 2 & 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Orders 1, 2 & 3 totaling an amount of $84,488.63. The revised contract amount is $761,433.86. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. The project budget is increased by $84,488.63. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all Councilmember Wasiluk introduced the following Resolution accepting City Project 98 -10 and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION 00 -012 ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that the construction contract for the Harvester Area Neighborhood Street Improvements, City Project 98 -10 is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 98 -10 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all 2. Harvester Avenue Streets, Project 98 -10, Landscaping Project Budget 10 a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Public Works Director Haider presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Koppen authorized the Finance Director to revise the project budget in the amount of $39,000 for the landscaping phase of the Harvester Area Neighborhood Streets, Project - 10. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 3. Spring Clean -Up 2000 0 a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Allenspach directed staff to proceed with the spring clean -up on April 22, 2000 and announced that the city will pay for the entire cost as in 1999. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all 4. HRC Request for Money to Sponsor Mixed Blood Performances a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Wasiluk approved up to $3,000 from the contingency account to be used by the Human Relations Commission to support Mixed Blood performances around the city. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 5. Senior Chemical Dependency Program Request for Charitable Gambling a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Tom Gehreng, representing Senior Chemical Dependency Program, 1351 Frost Avenue, presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Koppen approved the reallocation of charitable gambling funds for the Senior Chemical Dependency Program sot at they may use the $3 to purchase a copier and a computer rather than a public address system Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 6. Ramsey /Washington Suburban Cable Commission Resolution Opposing State Legislation to 11 Eliminate Franchising Authority a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Assistant to the City Manager Ericson presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Koppen approved support for the resolution from Ramsey/Washington Suburban Cable Commission regarding its opposition to proposed state legislation to eliminate municip authority and directed staffto send a resolution of support to local legislators. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Kathy Juenemann, 721 Mount Vernon Avenue M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. After discussion, Mayor Cardinal motioned to have Public Safety Dispatch Services put on the February Council /Manager Workshop. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen. 2. After discussion, Councilmember Collins motioned to have Organized Hauling put on the March Council/Manager Workshop. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. 3. Councilmember Koppen commended the Police Department in their success in intervening during a robbery attempt at his business. 4. Julie Wasiluk participated in a drive -along with the Maplewood Police Department and shared positive comments with fellow Councilmembers and those present. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None O. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Cardinal moved to adj ourn the meeting at 9:10 P.M. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all Karen E. Guiltbile, City Clerk 12 AGENDA NO. G -1 AGENDA REPORT Action by Cow TO: City Council Date FROM: Finance Director a t I Endorsed Modified RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Rejected DATE: February 7, 2000 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $78,479.72 $163,934.98 $46,736.82 $265,260.27 $76,767.99 $64,743.34 $376 $1,664,910.61 Checks #48061 thru #48139 dated 1 -25 -00 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 1 -19 thru 1 -24 -00 Checks #8206 thru #8217 dated 1 -14 thru 1 -26 -00 Checks #48142 thru #48247 dated 2 -1 -00 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 1 -25 thru 1 -31 -00 Checks #8221 thru #8226 dated 2 -1 thru 2 -8 -00 Checks #48250 thru #48346 dated 2 -8 -00 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 2 -1 thru 2 -4 -00 $2,737,816.13 Total Accounts Payable $442,189.26 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 1 -21 -00 $33,230.78 Payroll Deduction check #76736 thru #76741 dated 1 -21 -00 $329,179.39 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 2 -4 -00 $40,185.95 Payroll Deduction check #76955 thru #76962 dated 2 -4 -00 $844,785.38 Total Payroll $ 3,582,601.51 GRAND TOTAL VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 01/21/00 13:48 VOUCH ER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 48061 01/25/00 PATRICIA MYCKELBY REFUND SWIM 30.00 30.00 48062 01/25/00 RICHARD HOWARD REFUND PAT. INS PD F23348 136.52 136.52 48063 01/25/00 LEONE AWRAND REFUND PAT. INS PD F23906 207.48 207.48 48064 01/25/00 010467 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES TELEPHONE 11.52 11.52 48065 01/25/00 010490 ACCURATE ELECTRIC MOTOR SERV MOTOR REPAIR 270.96 270.96 48066 01/25/00 020150 AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 131.72 131.72 48067 01/25/00 021200 AMERICAN FASTENER OF MN, INC. SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 52.82 52.82 48068 01/25/00 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MAT SERV. 21.30 21.30 48069 01/25/00 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC. ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 892.00 892.00 48070 01/25/00 061100 BANNIGAN & KELLY P.A. DEC. 99 EXPENDITURES 10,352.44 RETAINER FEE- REP.IN DIST.COURT 5,245.10 15,597.54 48071 01/25/00 081120 BOILER SERVICES, INC. BOILER REPAIR - PUBLIC WORKS 290.00 290.00 48072 01/25/00 090660 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY, INC. AREA RUG 489.33 489.33 48073 01/25/00 110457 CARREER TRACK SCHOOLING -JOEL HEWITT 179.00 179.00 48074 01/25/00 120515 CENTRAL STORES CARTRIDGES, FILE FOLDERS, 441.01 CREDIT 66.63- 374.38 48075 01/25/00 120525 CENTURY COLLEGE CPR CARDS 27.00 27.00 48076 01/25/00 150190 COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONST. CO. LOCATE CABLE -CITY HALL /CO RD B 89.63 89.63 48077 01/25/00 151900 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP. H2S SENSOR FOR AIR MONITOR 178.39 178.39 48078 01/25/00 161300 CROSSON, LINDA LODGING-MRPA CONF. MANKATO 151.82 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 24.02 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 190 MI. 53.20 229.04 48079 01/25/00 200500 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS PAINT FOR SHOWER CEILINGS 107.22 107.22 48080 01/25/00 230900 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO. NOV. COPIER MIN. BILLING 30.06 NOV. COPIER MIN. BILLING 30.06 NOV. COPIER MIN. BILLING .99 NOV. COPIER MIN. BILLING 38.84 NOV. COPIER MIN. BILLING 80.91 NOV. COPIER MIN. BILLING 71.91 NOV. COPIER MIN. BILLING 17.15 NOV. COPIER MIN. BILLING 33.08 NOV. COPIER MIN. BILLING 80.42 1 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 01/21/00 13:48 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT NOV. COPIER MIN. BILLING 66.58 450.00 48081 01/25/00 234450 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 10,573.50 REDO BALLOTS -WORD MISSPELLED 2,658.51 NOTICE OF ELECT. PAD 7.92 13,239.93 48082 01/25/00 280960 FREEDOM #65 CAR WASHES 63.00 CAR WASHES 21.00 84.00 48083 01/25/00 280970 FRONTIER PRO SHOP BLUE RACQUETBALLS 52.44 WALLYBALLS 58.43 VOLLEYBALLS 136.36 247.23 48084 01/25/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 34.30 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 44.82 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 41.27 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 381.00 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 30.19 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 55.68 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 76.88 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 38.71 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 24.51 727.36 48085 01/25/00 300550 GE CAPITAL KODAK COPIER LEASE DEC. 99 35.29 KODAK COPIER LEASE DEC. 99 35.29 KODAK COPIER LEASE DEC. 99 1.26 KODAK COPIER LEASE DEC. 99 45.59 KODAK COPIER LEASE DEC. 99 94.99 KODAK COPIER LEASE DEC. 99 84.23 KODAK COPIER LEASE DEC. 99 20.13 KODAK COPIER LEASE DEC. 99 38.83 KODAK COPIER LEASE DEC. 99 94.42 KODAK COPIER LEASE DEC. 99 78.29 528.32 48086 01/25/00 301070 GALL'S, INC. WATER RESCUE/ ICE RESCUE KIT 130.98 130.98 48087 01/25/00 301600 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE FLAP VALVE, O'RING, GASKETS 276.17 276.17 48088 01/25/00 330690 HEALTH PARTNERS SHEEP LAB 63.00 DRUGS & SUPPLIES 287.49 350.49 48089 01/25/00 350700 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT SUPPLIES 105.19 105.19 48090 01/25/00 410420 KELLER ELECTRIC INC. INSTALL FIXTURE-WAKEFIELD, 262.50 262.50 48091 01/25/00 430350 KNOX LUMBER CO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 78.88 78.88 48092 01/25/00 470700 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS PUBLIC NOTICES 264.26 264.26 48093 01/25/00 500440 MLC COMMERCIAL PAINT. /REMODEL PAINT MEN /WOMEN SHOWER AREA 470.00 470.00 2 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 01/21/00 13:48 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 48094 01/25/00 500651 M.R.P.A. SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 96.00 96.00 48095 01/25/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 137.50 137.50 48096 01/25/00 540175 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. MDSE. FOR RESALE 380.40 380.40 48097 01/25/00 542342 MN PARK SUPERVISORS ASSOC. SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 25.00 25.00 48098 01/25/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO FILM 95.05 FILM DEVELOPING 14.71 FILM DEVELOPING 17.60 10 ROLLS SLIDE FILM 127.80 255.16 48099 01/25/00 550600 MN DEPUTY REGISTRAR ASSOC. MDRA DUES 2000 360.00 360.00 48100 01/25/00 570090 MOGREN BROS. DIRT 426.00 DIRT 85.20 511.20 48101 01/25/00 630040 N.P.E.L.R.A. 2000 ANNUAL TRAINING CONF.S.LE 395.00 395.00 48102 01/25/00 630638 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE PASSPORT FILM,POLOROID FILM 475.92 475.92 48103 01/25/00 661108 NORTH STAR WIPER & INDUSTRIAL PAPER PRODUCTS 291.09 291.09 48104 01/25/00 692800 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, INC. 10 LB .030 WIRE 30.71 30.71 48105 01/25/00 700665 PAIN ENTERPRISES, INC. POOL CHEMICALS 111.10 111.10 48106 01/25/00 720680 POWER PROCESS PUMP PACKING 1/2 " 375.31 375.31 48107 01/25/00 741201 RAINBOW FOODS FOOD 36.16 FOOD 80.06 116.22 48108 01/25/00 750500 REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL & LUBE CAR WASHES 7.54 CAR WASHES 42.24 CAR WASHES 22.62 CAR WASHES 53.70 126.10 48109 01/25/00 751380 RICHIE, CAROLE LUNCHES AT TRAINING 15.93 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 18 MI. 5.04 20.97 48110 01/25/00 762000 RON'S PAINTING & DECORATING PAINT RM 327 P.D. 399.95 399.95 48111 01/25/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. ADDING MACH.ROLLS,CORREC.TAPE 61.88 BINDER CLIPS,HEATER,STAPLER 163.73 WALLETS 37.35 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 663.72 RULER 1.04 CORRECTING TAPE 14.70 REFILL CARDS,FOLDERS,PENCILS 119.50 1 3 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 01/21/00 13:48 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 48112 01/25/00 810620 SHORTREED, MICHAEL MEALS -MEDIC SCHOOL 20.78 20.78 48113 01/25/00 820208 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND SIGNS 65.10 65.10 48114 01/25/00 820540 SMITH & WESSON IDENTI -KIT RENEWAL 408.00 408.00 48115 01/25/00 830239 SOKKIA CREDIT CORPORATION SURVEY EQUIPMENT 10 10,335.83 48116 01/25/00 831560 SPECTRUM PACE CLOCK, FLOAT COLLARS 76.86 CLOCK W /STAND 31 "ELEC. COMP. 304.57 381.43 48117 01/25/00 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF CRIME LAB SERVICES 170.00 170.00 48118 01/25/00 842800 STATE SUPPLY COMPANY BOILER GAUGES, WRENCH 139.96 139.96 48119 01/25/00 842810 STATE TREASURER REG. FOR M. OSTROM & N. CARVER 60.00 60.00 48120 01/25/00 843300 STEFFEN, SCOTT LUNCH AT TRAINING 28.97 28.97 48121 01/25/00 843655 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC DEVELOPER /DRUM UNITS - FAX /COPIE 616.50 616.50 48122 01/25/00 850332 SUCCESSORIES GROWTH.TREE,TEAMWORK CRANES 317.87 DAYSAVOR FYD SCREEN A DAY 21.39 339.26 48123 01/25/00 850674 SUPERIOR SERVICES DEC. RECYCLING 99 16,592.49 16,592.49 48124 01/25/00 860315 TR COMPUTER SALES, INC. ANN.SUPPORT, PERMITS & INSP. 1 1 48125 01/25/00 860320 T.R.F. SUPPLY CO. SCRIM TOWELS 168.27 168.27 48126 01/25/00 860410 TSE, INC. JANITORIAL SERV. 11/18- 12/15/ 573.48 573.48 48127 01/25/00 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA A/R TABLE TENNIS SET, SUNKIST 51.05 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 59.40 NON- SCHOOL DAY SUPPLIES 41.45 151.90 48128 01/25/00 860710 TAYLOR, MARSHA FITNESS PROGRAM CONSULTANT 1 1 48129 01/25/00 861690 THOMALLA, DAVID TUITION-EDUCATION & COMMUNITY 1 1 48130 01/25/00 880501 TREADWAY GRAPHICS PLUSH DAREN LIONS 479.79 479.79 48131 01/25/00 880750 TROY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES GUM REMOVER,CARPET SPOT, SOAP 164.03 164.03 48132 01/25/00 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 53.01 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 81.42 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 159.90 CREDIT 159.90 - UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 143.91 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 55.80 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 62.00 VOUCHRE2 01/21/00 13:48 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 48133 01/25/00 900173 UNITED HOSPITAL CITY MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 48134 01/25/00 900390 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 48135 01/25/00 901400 V.W. EIMICKE & ASSOCIATES 48136 01/25/00 911350 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 48137 01/25/00 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P. 48138 01/25/00 960500 XPEDX 48139 01/25/00 970700 YOCUM OIL CO. ITEM DESCRIPTION CREDIT SPECTRUM PRE -EMPL. PHYSICALS SPECTRUM PRE -EMPL. PHYSICALS SPECTRUM PRE-EMPL. PHYSICALS CEAM REGISTRATION -KEN HAIDER TELEPHONE MESSAGE PADS BALLAST, LAMP -100 WATT, MAG OUTSIDE BULB FOR STA. 4 THIN WIRE, MV100 WATT BALLAST DUPLICATE PMT. COMM. PLBG. INSP. IBM MULTIPURPOSE BRITE IBM MULTIPURPOSE BRITE IBM MULTIPURPOSE BRITE IBM MULTIPURPOSE BRITE IBM MULTIPURPOSE BRITE IBM MULTIPURPOSE BRITE IBM MULTIPURPOSE BRITE IBM MULTIPURPOSE BRITE IBM MULTIPURPOSE BRITE IBM MULTIPURPOSE BRITE FEUL FOR E1 & DC 1 CAR TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AMOUNT 62.00- 56.00 56.00 56.00 195.00 95.73 126.28 186.39 101.61 140.04- 370.00 2.84 2.84 .09 3.67 7.66 6.80 1.62 127.57 7.60 6.30 43.67 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 334.14 168.00 195.00 95.73 274.24 370.00 166.99 43.67 78,479.72 5 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Pi 01/18/00 01/19/00 01/18/00 01/19/00 01/14/00 01/19/00 01/19/00 01/20/00 01/19/00 01/20/00 01/13/00 01/19/00 01/20/00 01/21/00 01/20/00 01/21/00 01/10/00 01/21/00 01/21/00 01/24/00 01/21/00 01/24/00 01/21/00 01/24/00 MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer Elan Financial Service MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN Dept of Revenue MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN Dept of Revenue MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer U.S. Treasurer TOTAL Description Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 as Purchasing card items Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 Sales Tax - Dec 99 Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 Fuel Tax - Dec 99 Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 Federal Payroll Tax Amount 829.00 13,081.00 1,317.89 894.25 13,912.25 14,962.00 397.50 7 463.72 425.00 8,619.00 101,240.37 re VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 01/27/00 07:24 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 14 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 8206 01/14/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 1 1 8207 01/14/00 401616 JOHNSON, KEVIN A. OFFICER FOR 3M EVENT 100.00 100.00 8208 01/21/00 010484 ABOVE ALL HARDWOOD FLOORS RECOAT WOOD FLOORS AT MCC 774.80 RECOAT WOOD FLOORS AT MCC 6 7 8209 01/21/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 1 1 8210 01/21/00 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF TRUTH IN HOUSING EXAM 100.00 100.00 8211 01/24/00 341706 HERITAGE BANK 1/7 & 1/21 PAYROLLS 550.00 550.00 8212 01/24/00 943500 WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVENUE JAN 00 WI SWT 829.27 829.27 8213 01/25/00 350900 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL & SUITES ROOMS AT TRAINING - 3 OFFICERS 378.88 378.88 8214 01/25/00 780550 SALVATION ARMY DISASTER CONFERENCE 15.00 15.00 8215 01/25/00 460452 LEAGUE OF MINN. CITIES LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE 110.00 110.00 8216 01/26/00 561050 MINNESOTA UC FUND 4TH QTR UNEMPLOYMENT 532.54 532.54 8217 01/26/00 722200 P.E.R.A. 1/21 PAYROLL PERA 15,071.55 1/21 PAYROLL PERA 19,065.58 34,137.13 TOTAL CHECKS 46,736.82 7 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 01/28/00 12:41 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 48142 02/01/00 MARY SNYDER REFUND - WILD /WACKY DAYS OFF 20.00 20.00 48143 02/01/00 REDWING COMMUNITY EDUCATION REFUND GROUP FOR VISIT ON 1 -24 34.40 34.40 48144 02/01/00 TOM THUMB FOOD MARKETS REFUND FOR 3.2 BEER LICENSE 50.00 50.00 48145 02/01/00 CORINNE GUARDINI REFUND DEP. FOR ROOM RENTAL 250.00 250.00 48146 02/01/00 JARDINE, LOGAN & O'BRIEN REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 250.00 250.00 48147 02/01/00 PATRICIA ALLEN REFUND BASKETBALL 32.50 32.50 48148 02/01/00 AMY RICHARDS REFUND VOLLEYBALL CLASS CANC. 50.00 50.00 48149 02/01/00 KALING WONG REFUND - VOLLEYBALL CLASS CANC. 25.00 25.00 48150 02/01/00 JOSE BICUDO REFUND VOLLEYBALL CLASS CANC. 25.00 25.00 48151 02/01/00 RICHARD HOWARD REFUND TO PATIENT INS PAID 133.32 133.32 48152 02/01/00 DONNA MOEN REFUND PATIENT-INS. PD 342.35 342.35 48153 02/01/00 ALAN KNOWLTON REFUND PATIENT - OVERPAID 66.33 66.33 48154 02/01/00 PETER CONSENTINO REFUND PATIENT - OVERPAID 32.56 32.56 48155 02/01/00 010320 A.M.E.M. SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 50.00 50.00 48156 02/01/00 010467 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES TELEPHONE 10.82 10.82 48157 02/01/00 010575 ACE HARDWARE DUCT TAPE, MASKS, BAG KIT 32.02 32.02 48158 02/01/00 020150 AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 149.65 149.65 48159 02/01/00 020870 ALLIED MEDICAL ACCTS PMT. REQUIRED BY CONTRACT 371.37 371.37 48160 02/01/00 030310 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. REPAIR MONITOR 299.56 299.56 48161 02/01/00 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC. FEES FOR SERVICE 1 1 48162 02/01/00 031905 AQUA LOGIC, INC. CHEMICALS 1 1 48163 02/01/00 049990 ATKINS, KATIE PROGRAM SUPPLIES 25.63 25.63 48164 02/01/00 061695 BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 40.00 40.00 48165 02/01/00 070100 BEARCOM CREDIT MEMO 41.73 - RENT EMERG COMM Y2K EQUIP 990.45 948.72 48166 02/01/00 080925 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS MONTHLY WATER UTILITIES 71.90 MONTHLY WATER UTILITIES 28.43 �610 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 01/28/00 12:41 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT MONTHLY WATER UTILITIES 47.47 MONTHLY WATER UTILITIES 702.26 850.06 48167 02/01/00 090620 BREDEMUS HARDWARE TAX 1.52 1.52 48168 02/01/00 110093 CO2 SERVICES CHEMICALS 39.75 39.75 48169 02/01/00 110152 CSI SOFTWARE SOFTWARE MAINT. FEB 2000 267.00 267.00 48170 02/01/00 110460 CAREFREE COTTAGES OF MPLWD 100% TAX INCREMENT 2ND HALF 99 10,485.06 100% TAX INCREMENT 2ND HALF 99 12,849.32 90% TAX INCREMENT 2ND HALF 99 48,151.76 71,486.14 48171 02/01/00 151890 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP. TAR REMOVER 131.48 131.48 48172 02/01/00 180140 D.C. SALES CO., INC. 25 FT. FOIL FLEX 21.91 21.91 48173 02/01/00 180800 DALCO FILTER FOR VAC. 39.92 FUL TROL, MULTI FRESH SS CLEAN 358.62 EXTEND DUSTERS,PAPER TOWELS TP 324.81 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 267.60 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 414.19 1 48174 02/01/00 181852 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE NEW KEYS FOR M2 119.50 119.50 48175 02/01/00 230220 EDI CO. 75 SHEET ENV.FEEDER- KEYBOARD 347.19 OKIDATA ML521 - FINANCE 551.67 BANUM BACKPACK 166.14 REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT 208.74 MEMORY UPGRADES 417.48 1 48176 02/01/00 230960 ECOPRINT BUSINESS CARDS 135.79 BUSINESS CARDS 90.53 BUSINESS CARDS 45.26 271.58 48177 02/01/00 250178 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA DARE GRADUATION LUNCH 50.60 50.60 48178 02/01/00 250500 EXECUTONE SYSTEMS OF ST PAUL EXECUTONE Y2K UPGRADE 8 8 48179 02/01/00 260290 FARMER BROS. CO. MDSE. FOR RESALE 193.10 193.10 48180 02/01/00 280090 FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING INC. FINAL PMT.CONST.CONTRACT 98 -10 50,028.22 FINAL PMT.CONST.CONTRACT 98 -10 35,570.28 85,598.50 48181 02/01/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 11.20 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 12.80 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 30.96 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 32.40 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 43.51 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19 D VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 01/28/00 12:41 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 11.20 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 67.70 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 45.20 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 7.30 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 30.19 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 83.90 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 76.88 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 38.71 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 35.63 537.96 48182 02/01/00 301070 GALL'S, INC. MEDIC SUPPLIES 130.87 130.87 48183 02/01/00 301285 GEMPLER'S, INC. HIP BOOT RACK 30.90 GLOVES 70.30 101.20 48184 02/01/00 310680 GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING LIGHTING SUPPLIES 371.47 LIGHTING SUPPLIES 5.27 REPAIR /LABOR 3 CELL CYC LIGHT 242.72 619.46 48185 02/01/00 320240 GRACE, DUANE PLAN REVIEW 2,636.95 PLAN REVIEW 3 PLAN REVIEW 5 11 48186 02/01/00 320400 GRIGGS CONTRACTING, INC. UPGRADE PETROVEND SOFTWARE 1 1 48187 02/01/00 320638 GYM WORKS JAN. PREV. MAINT. 300.00 300.00 48188 02/01/00 330300 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY GLADSTONE 3 3 48189 02/01/00 340110 HEJNY RENTALS, INC ROUND TABLES 56.68 56.68 48190 02/01/00 350700 HIRSHFIELDS 2 GAL. STAIN 46.84 BRUSH 4.68 51.52 48191 02/01/00 350940 HOME DEPOT /GECF SMALL TOOLS 207.85 207.85 48192 02/01/00 401100 JET PRINT POST IT, PADS, TRASH 74.68 74.68 48193 02/01/00 410270 KAPAK CORP. PROPERTY ROOM SUPPLIES 128.11 128.11 48194 02/01/00 440100 KREMER SPRING & ALIGNMENT RIGHT REAR SPRING 399.76 399.76 48195 02/01/00 450120 L.M.C.I.T. MAGISTAD CLAIM 475.63 475.63 48196 02/01/00 450370 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 50.00 50.00 48197 02/01/00 460000 LE, SHERRIE L PHONE-HRIS TRAIN. IN DENVER 7.50 7.50 48198 02/01/00 470700 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS PUBLIC NOTICES 99- 05- SENTMAN 106.72 AD FOR SEASONAL NATURALIST POS 216.00 322.72 ITC VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 01/28/00 12:41 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 48199 02/01/00 500300 M.A. ASSOCIATES GLASS CLEANER 205.73 205.73 48200 02/01/00 500333 MCMA MCMA CONF. 2/11 -12 M. ERICSON 145.00 145.00 48201 02/01/00 500651 M.R.P.A. MEMB. DUES P.STAPLES 96.00 MEMB. DUES D. TAUBMAN 96.00 MEMB. DUES M. GRAF 81.00 MEMB. DUES A. ROBBINS 81.00 MEMB. DUES G. FINN 81.00 435.00 48202 02/01/00 501225 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT TANDEM TRUCK BOX PKG 26,484.42 26,484.42 48203 02/01/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 96.25 96.25 48204 02/01/00 511600 MASYS CORP HDWE /SFTWE MAINT. FEB 2000 704.25 704.25 48205 02/01/00 531400 METRO SALES INC. ACCESSORIES /280000 COPIES 3 OVERAGES 313.57 3 48206 02/01/00 531850 MYERS TIRE ELEC. TIRE CHANGER 3 3 48207 02/01/00 540175 MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. MDSE. FOR RESALE 440.20 CREDIT. 80.00- 360.20 48208 02/01/00 541912 MINNESOTA BUREAU OF CRIMINAL 4TH QUARTER (OCT-DEC) 1999 3,270.00 3 48209 02/01/00 541917 MN ASSOCIATION OF PROPERTY SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 25.00 25.00 48210 02/01/00 541980 MN DIVISION OF EMERG. MGMT. 2 REG.GOVERNORS EMERG.MGMT.MTG 205.00 205.00 48211 02/01/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO FILM DEVELOPING 3.67 FILM DEVELOPING 4.73 8.40 48212 02/01/00 542455 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC DOC. DESTRUCTION 66.60 66.60 48213 02/01/00 550260 MN CRIME PREVENTION ASSN. SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 30.00 30.00 48214 02/01/00 630028 N.E.S.A. YOUTH SCOREKEEPER 7.25 YOUTH REFEREE 473.00 480.25 48215 02/01/00 630638 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE PASSPORT CAMERA FILM 341.94 341.94 48216 02/01/00 640650 NEUMAN, BRIAN BOOK FOR EMT 77.10 77.10 48217 02/01/00 660800 NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF MONTHLY UTILITIES 1 MONTHLY UTILITIES 218.29 SEWER 1830 CO RD B & 1902 401.92 2 48218 02/01/00 661185 NORTHERN DOOR CO. DOOR REPAIR 88.50 88.50 48219 02/01/00 661600 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO. FIX HUB 2-PC WHEEL 31.92 31.92 11 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 01/28/00 12 :41 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 48220 02/01/00 690340 OLSON, ARNOLD G MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 235 MI. 65.80 65.80 48221 02/01/00 710315 PEOPLES ELECTRICAL- COMMUNICATI HOOK UP 4 GENERATORS Y2K 7 1 200.00 7 48222 02/01/00 712200 POOLE, CHRISTOPHER EMERGENCY CARE BOOK 50.65 50.65 48223 02/01/00 741201 RAINBOW FOODS SHEET CAKE, COOKIES 49.56 SPRITE, PLATES, TABLE CLOTHS 15.56 65.12 48224 02/01/00 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY - PRRREV 1999 VIOLATION BOOKS 790.80 DEC. COMP. USE 1999 -BATCH 2.55 DEC. COMP. USE 99 - INTER. .91 DEC. COMP. USE 99 - LINES 4.98 DEC. COMP. USE 99 - MASS STOR. .13 DEC. COMP. USE 99 - TELE. 6.17 DEC. COMP. USE 99 - IP 841.34 PRINTOUT OF PROPERTIES IN MPLW 284.40 1,931.28 48225 02/01/00 750550 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS MDSE. FOR RESALE 602.54 MDSE. FOR RESALE 425.98 1,028.52 48226 02/01/00 761200 ROAD RESCUE LAW ENFORCEMENT STROBE FOR E1 46.47 46.47 48227 02/01/00 762130 ROSEVILLE FIRE GROUND ACCT NAME TAGS 43.50 43.50 48228 02/01/00 762205 ROSSINI, DR. JAMES FITNESS PROGRAM FEES 250.00 250.00 48229 02/01/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. CASH REGISTER, NEON "OPEN "SIGN 362.62 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 115.05 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 115.05 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 26.71 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 81.47 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 50.13 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 33.91 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 5.33 SHELVING SETS 147.51 937.78 48230 02/01/00 780600 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT AIRHEADS,DUM DUMS,PB CUP,CHIPS 95.80 PB CUPS,SNICKERS,JUICE,CHIPS 237.60 M &M,SNICKERS,REESES,GATORADE 261.87 595.27 48231 02/01/00 800390 SERVICE & CONTRACTING FEES FOR SERVICE 29.95 29.95 48232 02/01/00 810500 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT SUPPLIES 28.45 28.45 48233 02/01/00 810620 SHORTREED, MICHAEL MEDIC SCHOOL PARKING, MEALS 79.86 79.86 48234 02/01/00 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF MEDIC SUPPLIES 844.79 844.79 48235 02/01/00 851575 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC. DESKJET /DESKWRITER 118.30 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 53.68 12 VOUCHRE2 01/28/00 12:41 ' VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION FUJI 4MM METER SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 48236 02/01/00 861621 THE GALLERY COLLECTION GALLERY CARDS GALLERY CARDS 48237 02/01/00 880835 TUBBS SNOWSHOES SNOWSHOES 48238 02/01/00 890900 U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 48239 02/01/00 890905 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ITEM AMOUNT 378.29 104.80 104.80 104.79 502.80 415.80 91.65 60.91 57.22 60.91 72.27 60.91 60.91 61.15 65.26 52.62 55.69 55.22 83.87 151.15 73.49 44.73 55.70 54.19 1,577.15 793.38 54.19 419.55 125.40 55.60 55.61 55.61 55.61 55.61 55.61 55.61 55.61 55.61 55.61 55.61 55.61 55.61 55.61 55.61 128.54 55.70 54.19 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 864.66 918.60 91.65 499.54 13 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 7 01/28/00 12:41 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT TELEPHONE 35.99 TELEPHONE 35.46 TELEPHONE 35.46 TELEPHONE 89.46 TELEPHONE 55.70 TELEPHONE 129.61 TELEPHONE 112.89 TELEPHONE 298.00 TELEPHONE 73.49 TELEPHONE 73.49 TELEPHONE 73.49 TELEPHONE 54.19 TELEPHONE 104.68 TELEPHONE 110.67 TELEPHONE 112.08 TELEPHONE 177.53 TELEPHONE 92.13 6 48240 02/01/00 890910 US WEST DEX PUBLISHING 103.40 103.40 48241 02/01/00 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 322.92 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 107.91 430.83 48242 02/01/00 911200 VIDEO SERVICE OF AMERICA VIDEO TAPES 68.27 VIDEO TAPES 11.22 79.49 48243 02/01/00 911350 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO DETECTOR 251.46 WHEEL KITS FOR GENS. 322.96 574.42 48244 02/01/00 912100 VIRTUE PRINTING DOG /CAT PERMIT FORMS 503.40 503.40 48245 02/01/00 920625 VOYAGEUR ASSEST MGMT, LLC INV. MGMT. FEE 752.00 752.00 48246 02/01/00 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P. COMM. PLBG. INSP. 2,017.00 COMM. PLBG. INSP. 2 COMM. PLBG. INSP. 2,521.25- 2,017.00 48247 02/01/00 941501 WHITE BEAR LAKE, CITY OF TUITION- HALWEG, KARIS 350.00 350.00 TOTAL CHECKS 265,260.27 14 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date P ee 01/24/00 01/24/00 01/24/00 01/24/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/21/00 01/26/00 01/26/00 01/27/00 01/27/00 01/28/00 01/28/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/26/00 01/26/00 01/26/00 01/27/00 01/27/00 01/28/00 01/28/00 01/31/00 01/31/00 MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer CBSA MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer Elan Financial Services MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer TOTAL Description Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 State Payroll Tax Dental fees Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 Purchasing card items Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 Drivers License #697 Deputy Registrar #149 Amount 548.50 9,517.63 18,034.65 1,094.29 655.00 10,531.00 2,997.74 948.00 7,446.00 821.50 11,220.00 776.00 12,177.68 76,7E�7.9J 15 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 02/04/00 13 :20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 8221 02/01./00 900175 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE BULK RATE FOR MAILINGS 220.41 220.41 8222 02/02/00 330680 HEALTHPARTNERS FEB HEALTH PREMIUM 5,083.32 FEB HEALTH PREMIUM 19,979.21 FEB HEALTH PREMIUM 4 29,437.77 8223 02/02/00 530100 .MEDICA CHOICE FEB MEDICA PREMIUM 5 FEB MEDICA PREMIUM 23,757.95 FEB MEDICA PREMIUM 1 29,967.89 8224 02/03/00 110870 CBSA FEB DENTAL ADMIN FEE 482.80 FEB DENTAL ADMIN FEE 31.50 514.30 8225 02/03/00 551100 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE FEB LIFE PREMIUM 326.30 FEB LIFE PREMIUM 1,188.30 FEB LIFE PREMIUM 947.21 FEB LIFE PREMIUM 56.88 2 8226 02/03/00 280200 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. FEB FORTIS PREMIUM 2 2 48250 02/08/00 JAMES NOAH REFUND MEMB.-MOVED 339.39 339.39 48251 02/08/00 MARGARET HUSTAD REFUND - SWIM 40.00 40.00 48252 02/08/00 DEBBIE FERLAS REFUND -SWIM 40.00 40.00 48253 02/08/00 SCOTT PARENT REFUND MEMB. 253.22 REFUND MEMB. TAX. 16.46 INITIAL REFUND 68.75 INITIAL REFUND 4.47 342.90 48254 02/08/00 MARY FEUEHT REFUND BASKETBALL 26.67 26.67 48255 02/08/00 ROBERT SCHWARTZ REFUND PATIENT PAID F23866 233.69 233.69 48256 02/08/00 010463 A T & T LD PHONE CALLS 367.07 367.07 48257 02/08/00 010467 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES TELEPHONE 21.35 TELEPHONE 59.48 TELEPHONE 103.68 TELEPHONE 23.04 207.55 48258 02/08/00 010575 ACE HARDWARE FASTENERS, EYE BOLT 3.18 TAPE, CONNECTOR,PIPE,CEMENT, 162.94 SPACE HEATER -PAT SGT. OFF. 19.16 185.28 48259 02/08/00 020411 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE CELL PHONES 30.97 CELL PHONE 30.97 CELL PHONE 30.97 TELEPHONE 5.86 CELL PHONES 55.98 �I. VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 02/04/00 13:20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT TELEPHONE 28.85 CELL PHONES 366.07 48260 02/08/00 021205 AMERICAN FLAGPOLE & FLAG CO. U.S. FLAGS 143.78 48261 .02/08/00 021465 AMERICAN RED CROSS POCKET MASKS 159.00 LIFEGUARD TRAIN.PROG.SUPPLIES 382.80 MANIKIN RENTAL 16.05 MANIKIN RENTAL FOR STAFF MTG. 64.20 48262 02/08/00 030310 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MOBILE RADIO,HANDSET,HEADSET 7 PAGER REPAIR 80.51 48263 02/08/00 030420 ANDERSON, EVERETT A MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 275 MI. 77.00 48264 02/08/00 030725 ANKENY KELL ARCHITECTS CONSTRUCTION - BUILDING 9 48265 02/08/00 081105 BOEHM'S SCHWINN SPINNING BIKE REPAIRS 144.59 SPINNING BIKE LABOR 325.00 48266 02/08/00 120525 CENTURY COLLEGE COST OF CPR CARDS 63.00 48267 02/08/00 130280 CHRI'STENSEN, CHUCK COPIER TONER /WHEELS FOR GEN. 170.38 48268 02/08/00 151340 COMPTON, DENNIS TRAINING SEMINAR 2 48269 02/08/00 151830 CONNEY SAFTEY PRODUCTS GLOVES, MASKS, FINGER TIPS, 134.61 48270 .02/08/00 152400 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. INKJET COLOR PAPER 51.85 48271 02/08/00 161200 CROSBY FIRE DEPARTMENT MN STATE FIRE DEPT.ASSOC.CONF. 560.00 48272 02/08/00 161350 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT REPAIR TAILGATE 201.63 48273 :02/08/:00 1'70300 `CYBEX'' :I NTE,RNAT I ONAL, INC, REPAIR PARTS & EQUIP. 39.99 48274 02/08/00 180230 DLT SOLUTIONS, INC. AUTOCAD UPGRADE 677.34 48275 02/08/00 180800 DALCO SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 178.10 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 246.76 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 254.31 48276 02/08/00 210950 DUNN, ALICE MEALS AT TRAINING 42.72 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 133.87 48277 02/08/00 230280 E.L. REINHARDT COMPANY INC. LOCKS FOR SPRINKLER SYS. 40.26 48278 02/08/00 240375 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. SERVICE TO M1 221.50 48279 02/08/00 260660 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSOC OF MINN PUMP OPERATION BOOK 95.90 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 549.67 143.78 622.05 7 77.00 9 469.59 63.00 170.38 2, 371.00 134.61 51.85 560.00 201.63 39.99 677.34 679.17 176.59 40.26 221.50 95.90 17 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 02/04/00 13:20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 48280 02/08/00 260756 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY PAYING AGENTS FEES 325.00 PAYING AGENTS FEES 175.00 500.00 48281 02/08/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 55.68 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 76.88 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 38.71 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 24.51 195.78 4.8282 ,02/08/00 ,301280 GEISSLER, WALTER M. COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES 225.00 225.00 48283 02/08/00 310660 GOPHER SPORT POOL MAT 133.28 133.28 48284 02/08/00 320490 GROSCHEN, JOE EMT BOOKS 78.60 78.60 48285 02/08/00 330145 HAKSETH, NATHAN EMT BOOKS 77.10 77.10 48286 02/08/00 370100 HUTCHINSON, ANN BEDDING /SALAMANDER, CRISCO 24.58 MOUSE TRAPS 25.92 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 42.9 MI. 12.00 62.50 48287 02/08/00 380820 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS COPIER LEASE 80% 257.47 COPIER LEASE 20% 64.37 321.84 48288 02/08/00 400950 JEANE THORNE TEMPORARY SERVICE WORD PROC. SECRETARY 456.72 456.72 48289 02/08/00 401670 JOLLY TYME FAVORS FISH POND TREES, RULERS 128.40 128.40 48290 02/08/00 410370 KATH COMPANIES KEYS FOR R3 26.46 26.46 48291 02/08/00 440110 KRINKIE HTG & AIR CONDITIONING REPAIR TO HTG.SYSTEM AT STA. 1 111.95 111.95 48292 02/08/00 500310 M.A.M.A. SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 45.00 45.00 48293 02/08/00 ,501220 MACDONALD & MACK ARCHITECTS LT ARCHITECTURAL-BRUENTRUP FARM 528.00 528.00 48294 02/08/00 501225 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT SCHMIDT POLY PLOW/FALLS WING 26,912.55 VEHICLES 1 1 054.22 27 48295 02/08/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 68.75 68.75 48296 02/08/00 530730 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY SOFTBALLS 1 1 357.00 SOFTBALLS 2 SOFTBALLS 323.01 3 1 880.01 48297 02/08/00 530755 METROCALL PAGER RENTAL 22.57 22.57 48298 02/08/00. 530815 METRO FIRE INC. 4 THERMAL IMAGER CAMERAS 68,000.00 68,000.00 48299 02/08/00 531650 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER - FEB. 2000 169,772.00 169 48300 02/08/00 540183 MIDWEST REFRESHMENTS INC. HOT CHOCOLATE MIX 264.00 264.00 18 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 02/04/00 13:20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION - AMOUNT AMOUNT 48301 02/08/00 540770 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGERS 232.14 232.14 48302 02/08/00 542130 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR, INC. ELEVATOR SERVICE & REPAIR 157.34 157.34 48303 02/08/00 542310 MINNESOTA NATURALIST ASSOC. MEMBERSHIP MAILING LIST 25.00 25.00 48304 02/08/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO FILM DEVELOPING 5.99 CAMERA 85.20 REPRINTS NEG. WORK-BANQUET RM 99.82 REPRINTS WEG. WORK-THEATER 49.91 PUBLISHING 9,73 SLIDES 7.66 258.31 48305 02/08/00 570100 JOHN MONK FOOD FOR Y2K STANDBY 51.04 51.04 48306 02/08/00 630668 NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT CONF. EXPLORER CONV. RESERVATION FEE 100.00 100.00 48307 02/08/00. 661755 NORTHERN STATES POWER REPAIR STREETLGHT -1701 MCKNIGH 652.00 652.00 48308 02/08/00 670950 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC MAILING MCC POSTCARDS 931.88 931.88 48309 :02/0$/00 691160 ON SITE SANITATION SANITATION SERVICES 55.65 SANITAITON SERVICES 55.65 111.30 48310 02/08/00 692800 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, INC. ELECTRODE, MILD STEEL 86.94 86.94 48311 02/08/00 700675 PAKOY,GENE MECHANICAL INSPECTIONS 19,143.49 MECHANICAL INSPECTIONS 23,929.38 MECHANICAL INSPECTIONS 23,929.38- 19 ,143.49 48312 02/08/00 711400 PETSMART WATER TREATMENT 13.58 13.58 48313 02/08/00 711690 PIONEER PRESS SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 91.00 91.00 4$314. 02/08/00 ;721200 ' PRO SOURCE FJ TNESS REPA I�R. PARTS & EQUIP. 172.62 172.62 .48315 02/08/00 741201 RAINBOW FOODS EMPLOYEE COMMITTEE SUPPLIES 63.66 FOOD 26.38 90.04 48316 02/08/00 750550 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS CHIPS,CHEESE SAUCE,PLATES 478.91 478.91 48317 02/08/00 751505 RIVERWOOD CONFERENCE CENTER CANC.CHG.-CITY COUNCIL RETREAT 930.22 930.22 48318 02/08/00 761200 ROAD RESCUE LAW ENFORCEMENT REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE 46.47 46.47 48319 02/08/00 761300 ROADRUNNER DELIVER CHG 25.60 PICK UP 38.20 PICK UP 25.55 89.35 48320 .02/08/00 780295 S & D DOOR REPAIR, INC. EXPRESS WINDOW FOR MOTOR VEH. 608.21 608.21 19 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 02/04/00 13 :20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 48321 02/08/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE 5.33 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 26.71 CORR.FILM,DUST OFF,MOUSE KIT 87.81 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 56.30 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 50.37 FOLDERS,ERASERS,TAB FILE,BINDE 79.26 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 29.39 SHELVING SETS 147.51 • BINDERS 36.00 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 25.45 544.13 48322 02/08/00 780350 S.E.H. PROFESSIONAL SERV. 11/1 -12 -31 11,760.00 PROFESSIONAL SERV.6 /1 -12/31 24,604.32 36,364.32 48323 02/08/00 780600 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT CASH REGISTER,.NEON OPEN SIGNS 362.62 362.62 48324 02/08/00 800075 SEARS VACUUM 53.12 53.12 48325 02/08/00 810620 SHORTREED, MICHAEL MEDIC SCHOOL LUNCHES 19.80 19.80 48326 02/08/00 820490 SLATE CREEK PRESS SHIPPING /HANDLING ON BOOK 3.00 3.00 48327`'02/08/00 831550 SPECTRUM HUMAN RESOURCE SYSTEM HR VANTAGE SOFTWARE INTERFACE 2,700.00 2,700.00 48328 02/08/00 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF MAINT. /.SERVICE FOR DEC.99 178.90 MAINT. /SERVICE FOR DEC.99 221.90 MAINT. /SERVICE FOR DEC.99 730.68 MAINT. /SERVICE FOR DEC.99 80.66 1,212.14 48329 02/08/00 843570 STREAMLINE DESIGN SHIRTS W /PRINT 29.70 29.70 48330 02/08/00 843575 STREICHER'S 25 CASES AMMUNITION 2,933.01 2,933.01 48331 .02/08/00 843655 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC MAINT AGREEMENT /FAX COPIERS 467.48 MAINT AGREEMENT /FAX COPIERS 467.48 934.96 48332 02/08/00 850340 SUMMIT INSPECTIONS INSPECTION SERVICES 1,998.40 INSPECTION SERVICES 2,498.00 INSPECTION SERVICES 2 1,998.40 48333 02/08/00 851600 TOM SZCZEPANSKI MEALS, LODGING AT TRAINING 278.19 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 59.99 338.18 48334 02/08/00 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA A/R COKE, DIET COKE, SPRITE 31.90 NAME BADGES 9.54 INFLATING NEEDLES 5.28 LABELS 1.57 MARKERS 2.66 TABLE TENNIS BALLS 2.53 HOOVER QUICK BROOM,WIPE,SQUEEG 59.86 PHONE CORDS 21.26 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 02/04/00 13:20 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER f DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION PHONE CORDS CALCULATOR 48335 02/08/00 861611 THE CREATIVE GROUP MCC POSTCARD PUBLISHING EXPENSES 48336 02/08/00 861677 THIENES, PAUL REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE .MEALS AT'TRAINING ANTI FREEZE, GAS 48337 02/08/00 862700 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC. RENTAL OF TRIPOD 48338 02/08/00 863000 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY SPOOL MATIC -30A, MIL 903769 48339 02/08/00 871600 TOUSLEY FORD, INC. GAUGE INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES 48340 02/08/00 880501 TREADWAY GRAPHICS PENS,PENCILS,CLOCKS,BRIEFCASE 48341 02/08/00 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTHING UNIFORMS & CLOTHING UNIFORMS & CLOTHING UNIFORMS & CLOTHING UNIFORMS & CLOTHING UNIFORMS & CLOTHING BDU PANTS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 48342 02/08/00 900160 UNITED BROADCASTING PUBLISHING PUBLISHING 48343 02/08/00 900225 UNITED RENTALS, INC. SNOW PUSHER RENTAL 48344 02/08/00 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P. COMM. PLBG. INSP. COMM. PLBG. INSP. COMM. PLBG. INSP. 48345 02/08/00 940500 WEBER & TROSETH INC. EXTINGUISHER INSPECTION 48346 02/08/00 980545 ZIMMERMAN -HORN, ANN SCHOOLING 1 CLASS TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AMOUNT 12.76 19.05 1,248.00 ..256.00 162.00 6.38 25.86 17.30 30.00 2,576.24 28.27 17.17 74.69 4.26 66.15 75.51 57.51 224.86 149.19 32.95 35.00 62.25 249.00 174.00 98.09 300.00 375.00 375.00- 15.00 40.00 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 166.41 1,666.00 49.54 30.00 2,576.24 45.44 74.69 707.68 423.00 98.09 300.00 15.00 40.00 441,725.74 21 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 02/01/00 14:00 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 14 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 8218 01/27/00 8219 01/28/00 8220 01/28/00 VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT, AMOUNT 630800 NATIONAL SPRINKLER ASSOC SPRINKLER PROTECTION CLASS 99.00 99.00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 1,438.00 1,438.00 630018 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS PERA LIFE INS - 1/00 213.00 213.00 TOTAL CHECKS 1,750.00 22 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checkin g account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Pad ee Desc 01/31/00 02/01/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 01/31/00 02/01/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 p Y g 01/28/00 02/01/00 CBSA Dental fees 02/01/00 02/01/00 Firstar Bank Debt payments 02/01/00 02/02/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers. License #697 02/01/00 02/02/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 011/28/00 02/02/00 Elan Financial Services Purchasin g card items ..02102/00 02/03/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 02/02/00 02/03/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar p y #149 :02/03/00 02/04/00 , MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 02/03/00 02/04/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 p Y 02/04/00 02/07/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 02/04/00. 02/07/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 02/04/00 02/07/00 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax TOTAL Amount 703.50 1 7,062.61 115.00 11516,788.75 881.00 12,97,2.75 1,445.15 924;.25 16,117.87 757.00 14,171.12 427.00 12,839.00 69, 705.61 1, 664, 910.61 23 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK.DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN 17 4 8.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 SPANGLER, EDNA E 4 8 7.7 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 ALLENSPACH SHERRY 339927 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21./00 ANDERSON,CAROLE J 1634.36 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 DEHN,DEBORAH 20.97 DIRECT DEPOSIT { 01/2.1/00 CARLEJEANETTE E 1410975 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 JAGOE , CAROL 13 5 5.2 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 OLSON , SANDRA 8 3 8.9 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 ALDRIDGE , MARK 2 0 9 6.9 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 BOHL , JOHN C 2 3 8 8.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 FLOR, TIMOTHY 2 0 2 9.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 EVERSON PAUL 213 5.8 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01 21/00 FRASER JOHN 2 0 5 9.2 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 OSWALD ERICK D 17 2 0.10 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 DUCHARME,JOHN 1725.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 0.1/21/00 PECK,DENNIS L 1824.03 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 GREW — HAYMAN , JANET M 9 8 2.9 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 EKSTRAND , THOMAS G 18 3 6.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 ROBERTS ,' KENNETH 18 0 3.2 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J 312 3.6 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 EDGE DOUGLAS .1553o57 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 LIVINGSTON,JOYCE L 813.14 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 PALMA,STEVEN 2051.89 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 JOHNSON , KEVIN 2 2 9 6.8 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 ERI CKSON , VIRGINIA A 2 4 31.6 7 24 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD` CHECK NUMBER - CHECK DATE .EMPLOYEE NAME - AMOUNT ------ - - - -- DIRECT DEPOSIT ---- - - - - -- 01/21/00 ------------------------ - - - -- LUTZ , DAVID P --------------- 17 2 0.10 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 FARR, D IANE M 2 6 2.81 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 NAGEL BRYAN 17 2 8.10 E DIRECT DEPOSIT t 01/21/00 HELLE,KERRY 2026968 DIRECT DEPOSIT f 01/21/00 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1803.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/2.1/00 OSTER,ANDREA J 1465.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 ANDREWS,SCOTT A 2029.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 SAVAGEAU, STEPHEN D 1316.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 HASSENSTAB, DENISE R 95,20 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 MARTINSON , CAROL F 13 5 5.2 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 HI EBERT , STEVEN 2340,31 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 DUNN ,ALICE 2 0 2 9.6 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 CORNER, AMY L 2 0 2.0 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 HORSNELL JUDITH A 822.42 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 SEEGER,GERALD F 334964 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 MOREHEAD,JESSICA R 73.60 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 COLEMAN,PHILIP 200919 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 CHRI STENSEN , CHARLES M 1268,00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 BELDE , STANLEY 19 3 6.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 FRY , PATRI CIA 1417.6 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT° 01/21/00 RENSLOW, RITA 223.45 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 B E LO AKK , NN A 2265.24 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 80WMAN,RICK A 2045.06 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 KOPPEN , MARVIN 3 3 9.2 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 CHRISTENSEN,JODIE D 628.93 25 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE ----- - -- EMPLOYEE NAME - - AMOUNT ------ - - - - -- DIRECT DEPOSIT - - - 01/21/00 ------------------------ - - -- PIKE , GARY K --------------- 19 0 3 .6 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 I CKES , SHERI 12 6 9.8 8 DIRECT. DEPOSIT 01/21/00 HEINZ, STEPHEN J 2026.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 3 01/21/00 NELSON, JEAN 888934 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 KELLY,LISA 1006.62 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 HEMQUIST,MICHAEL R 2098.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 TET ZLAFF , JUDY A 5 8 6.6 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 URBANSKI , HOLLY S 14 5 5.6 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 ZWI EG , SUSAN C. 14 3 8.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00. SMITH , CAS SANDRA L 490,34 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 SKRYPEK , JOSHUA L 802.20 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 HERBERT MICHAEL J 2 0 2 6.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 STOCKTON,DERRELL T 2026.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 MELANDER,JON A 2775.73 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 ROSSMAN,DAVID A 2806.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 THOMAS— JR,STEVEN 1688.42 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 PRIEBE,WILLIAM 1758.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 DOHERTY , KATHLEEN M 14 6 5. 6 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1505963 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 HALWEG , KEVIN R 3159o16 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 OTI S , MARY ELLEN M 5 5 2.3 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 CASAREZ,GINA 1292.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 MEYER,GERALD W 1783.45 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 PARSONS , KURT G 12 7 3.0 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 JUNG, STEPHANIE J 13 3 7. 6 3 26 .CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS:REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 MARUSKA, ERICA 4 4 9.4 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT _ 01/21/00 NORDQUI ST , RI CHARD 15 0 4.8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 JACKSON MARY L 1292 *8 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 GAYNOR,VIRGINIA A 638.87 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 OLSONJULIE S 1548.46 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 SWANSON,LYLE 1530.87 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 BREHEIM,ROGER W 1529.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 LARSON ,DANIEL J 1598,82 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 CORCORAN , THERESA M 10 4 2.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 MOORE , VANES SA J 720911 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 DeBILZAN, THOMAS C 1325.52 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 THI ENES PAUL 2098,05 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 LARSON , DEBRA 235970 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 CARLSON,THERESE 1739.54 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 LE,SHERYL 3009.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 FAUST,DANIEL F 3406.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT .DEPOSIT 01/21/00 BAUMAN , GAYLE L 2 0 9 8.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 KELSEY , CONNI E L 17 51.2 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 GUILFOILE , KAREN E 2 0 0 6.5 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 POWELL, PHILIP 16 9 9.7 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 WINGER DONALD S 3 3 2 5.18 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 BANICK,JOHN J 3849.16 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/2.1/00 K;ARIS, FLINT D 2632.10 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 KVAM, DAVID 2 9 31.9 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 RABBETT , KEVIN 2 5 8 8.5 7 27 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 STEFFEN, SCOTT L 2 719.8 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 THOMALLA, DAVID J 3849916 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/2 . 1/ 0 0 BERGERON , JOSEPH A 2583,19 DIRECT DEPO -SIT 01/21/00 GERVAIS- JR,CLARENCE N 1792.89 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 LUKIN,STEVEN J 2185.45 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 HAIDER,KENNETH G 3406.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 PRIEFER,WILLIAM 2766.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 KANE ,MICHAEL R 2135,23 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 LUNDSTEN,LANCE 2376.78 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 CAVETT ,CHRISTOPHER M 2465,83 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 ANDERSON , BRUCE 3 0 6 2.10 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 MARUSKA, MARK A 3152983 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 HUTCHINSON , ANN E 1780,03 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 COLEMAN , MELINDA 2 9 5 0.6 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 GRAF,MICHAEL 1211.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 ROBBINS , AUDRA L 1211,23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 ATKINS,KATHERINE 1149.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 CROS SON , LINDA 1628,03 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 EASTMAN , THOMAS E 2132066 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 STAPLES , PAULINE 2402,35 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 SCHLINGMAN , PAUL 18 2 6.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 HURLEY STEPHEN 2248994 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 2452.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 WENZEL,JAY B 1463.19 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/21/00 JOHNSON , MEGAN M 2 6 8.01 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76309 01/21/00 SWANSON,VERONICA 209.00 76310 01/21/00 EDSON, KAREN L 380,00 76404 01/21/00 CARDINAL,ROBERT J. 385.50 76405 01/21/00 COLLINS,KENNETH V 339.27 76406 01/21/00 WASILUK,JULIE A 339.27 76407 01/21/00 ERICSON,MICHAEL A 2271.22 76408 01/21/00 HENSLEY,PATRICIA 114.54 76409 01/21/00 McGUIRE,MICHAEL A 4180.37 76410 01/21/00 ZICK,LINDA 345.00 76411 01/21/00 WHITE,BARRY T 60.00 76412 01 / 21 / 0 0 CUDE , LARRY J 391.71 76413 01/21/00 DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J 243.93 76414 01/21/00 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 734.11 76415 . 01/21/00 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 2400.49 76416 01/21/00 NIVEN,AMY S 418.00 76417 01/21/00 JOHNSON,BONNIE 834.58 76418 01/21/00 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1607.23 76419 01/21/00 PALANK,MARY KAY 1355923 76420 01/21/00 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1355.23 76421 01/21/00 RYAN,MICHAEL 4320978 76422 01/21/00 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1492.83 76423 01/21/00 BARTZ,PAUL 2155.32 76424 01/21/00 BUSACK,DANIEL P 1329.37 76425 01/21/00 CAMPBELL,CRAIG D 1205.60 76426 01/21/00 DOBLAR,RICHARD N 1205.60 29 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER - - - CHECK DATE ---- - EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT ------ - -- 76427 - - - -- 01/21/00 ------------------------ - - - - -- KNEFELKAMP,KARI L -------- - - - - -- 42950 76428 01/21/00 KONG,TOMMY T 896.83 76429 01/21/00 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 2137o93 76430 01/21/00 WATCZAK,LAURA 2189.21 76431 01/21/.00 WELCHLIN, CABOT V 2180936 76432 01/21/00 HALE,THOMAS M 1523.30 76433 01/21/00 MEEHAN,JAMES 2470.23 76434 01/21/00 ACOSTA,MARK J 780.00 76435 01/21/00 AMBORN,JASON H 516900 76436 01/21/00 ANDERSON,BOBBIE J 456.00 76437 01/21/00 ANDERSON,BRIAN 385.00 76438 01/21/00 ANDERSON,PHILIP A 678900 76439 01/21/00 ANDERSON— JR,LAIRD 528.00 76.440 01/21/00 AUBIN,DENNIS J 1406.00 76441 01/21/00 BAHL,DAVID C 1143900 76442 01/21/00 BALAZS,JOSEPH M 836.00 76443 01/21/00 BARTEL,BRENDA K 36.00 76444 01/21/00 BAUMAN,ANDREW C 590.00 76445 01/21/00 BECK,PATRICK L 655.00 76446 01/21/00 BOE,ERICK W 614.00 76447 01/21/00 BOLLES,THOMAS A 1450.00 76448 01/21/00 BOURQUIN,RON G 610.00 76449 01/21/00 BRAATEN,HAROLD A 802.00 76450 01/21/00 BUCHE,JOETTE 1852.00 76451 01/21/00 CAHILL,CHRISTOPHER S 1146.00 30 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 76452 01/21/00 CROMETT,MARK F 76.453 01/21/00 DALY,FRANK 76454 01/21/00 DAWSON,RICHARD P 76455 01/21/00 DIETZ,EDWARD W 76456 01/21/00 `DITTEL,MICHAEL A 76457 01/21/00 DOREE,KURT A 76458 01/21/00 DOWNS,DANA K 76459 01/21/00 DUELLMAN,AMY L 76460 01/21/00 DUELLMAN,JOSEPH W 76461 01/21/00 DUELLMAN,KIRK T 76462 01/21/00 DeMARS,TIMOTHY A 76463 01/21/00 EKSTRAND,HOWARD R 76464 01/21/00 EVERSON,PAUL E 76465 01/21/00 FARNSWORTH,GRANT R 76466 01/21/00 FASULO,WALTER R 76467 01/21/00 FETTERS,JEFFREY L 76468 01/21/00 FITZGERALD,EDWARD P 76469 01/21/00 GERARD,JAMIE P 76470 01/21/00 GERVAIS- JR,CLARENCE N 76471 01/21/00 GRILL, CARL 76472 01/21/00 GROSCHEN,JOSEPH D 76473 01/21/00 HAKSETH,NATHAN I 76474 01/21/00 HALE,THOMAS M 76475 01/21/00 HALWEG,KEVIN R 76476 01/21/00 HAMLIN,ANDREW G AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 14 64.3 3 1418.00 856.00 540.00 1480.00 1177.00 108.00 624.00 516.00 836.00 326.00 744.00 396.00 5.00 118 0.0 0 2338.00 480.00 2475.00 1368.00 876.00 410.00 430.00 562.00 838.00 837.00 31 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76477 01/21/00 HAYES,JODI L 636.00 76478 01/21/00 HEFFERNAN,PATRICK E 1793.00 76479 01/21/00 HERLUND,RICK R 1594900 76480 01/21/00 HOHN,JAMES M 1640.00 76481 01/21/00 JOHNSON,ANDREA D 384.00 76482 01/21/00 JOHNSON,DOUGLAS R 1480.00 76483 01/21/00 JUNGMANN,DAVID J 946.00 76484 01/21/00 KARNOWSKI,SANDRA J 555.00 76485 01/21/00 KNABE,WILLIAM H 1194900 76486 01/21/00 KOEHN,CORY M 1060.00 76487 01/21/00 KOLASA,MARK A 756.00 .76488 01/21/00 KONDER,RONALD W 2814.00 76489 01/21/00 KORTUS,WILLIAM J 1546.00 76490 01/21/00 LIALLIER,TED C 430.00 76491 01/21/00 LACKNER,GREGORY J 492.00 76492 01/21/00 LEDMAN,KEVIN 1174.00 76493 01/21/00 LEWSADER,PAUL J 276.00 76494 01/21/00 LIDBERG,MICHAEL A 982.00 76495 01/21/00 LINN,BRYAN D 504.00 76496 01/21/00 LUCERO,ROGER E 325.00 76497 01/21/00 MALLORY,GORDON E 1113.00 76498 01/21/00 MARTY,MARK K 2776900 7.6499 01/21/00 MELANDER,JON A 1470.00 76500 01/21/00 MELANDER,SCOTT A 1469.00 76501 01/21/00 MELLEN,RICHARD T 585900 32 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76502 01/21/00 MEYERS,PAUL E 1080.00 76503 01/21/00 MILLER,NICHOLAS J 1032.00 76504 01/21/00 MONK,JOHN J 888.00 76505 01/21/00 MONROY,JON J 4090.00 76506 01121/00 McGOVERN,JOHN L 1230.00 76507 01/21/00 NALIPINSKI,STEPHEN M 1572.66 76508 01/21/00 NEUMAN,BRIAN A 345.00 76509 01/21/00 NOLAN,PAUL W 600.00 76510 01/21/00 NOVAK,JEROME R 420.00 76511 01/21/00 OLSON,KENNETH A 600.00 76512 01/21/00 PETERSON,MARK S 1031900 76513 01/21/00 PETERSON,RICHARD A 600.00 76514 01/21/00 PETERSON,ROBERT H 1823.00 76515 01/21/00 PETERSON,THEODORE E 1038900 76516 01/21/00 PIERCE,SCOTT G 3074.00 76517 01/21/00 PILLAR,MICHAEL R 328.00 76518 01/21/00 POOLE,CHRISTOPHER C 416.00 76519 01/21/00 RICKETSON,BRENT L 1680.00 76520 01/21/00 RONDEAU,WILLIAM R 1542.00 76521 01/21/00 SCHADT,JEFFREY A 2183000 76522 01/21/00 SCHOENECKER,THOMAS R 804.00 76523 01/21/00 SCHULTZ,THOMAS E 720.00 76524 01/21/00 SEVERSON,DAVID A 1440.00 76525 01/21/00 SHANLEY,ROBERT J 60.00 76526 01/21/00 SIEDOW,ERIC R 312.00 33 1 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76527 01/21/00 SIKORA,PAUL T 1248900 76528 01/21/00 SINGER,SCOTT W 506.00 76529 01/21/00 SKOK,STEPHEN L 612.00 76530 01/21/00 SMITH,KEITH A 1054.00 76531 01/21/00 SMITH,MICHAEL T 910.00 76532 01/21/00 SOBCZAK,KEVIN J 12.00 76533 01/21/00 STANWAY,ROBERT A 396.00 6534 01/21/00 SVENDSEN,RON 1096.00 i 6535 01/21/00 SVENDSEN, RUSTIN L 1734.00 76'536 01/21/00 SZULIM, JERRY A 1138.00 73537 01/21/00 TES SMER,TODD D 845.00 76538 01/21/00 TREPANIER,EUGENE 1338.00 76539 01/21/00 TRONNES,JOHN E 482.00 76540 01/21/00 UBEL,JEFFREY J 310900 76541 01/21/00 VOGEL,JENNY B 290.00 76542 01/21/00 WALZ,JAMES G 924900 76543 01/21/00 WATERS,JOSEPH D 1522.00 76544 01/21/00 WELDON,ROBERT W 984.00 76545 01/21/00 WHISLER,MICHAEL D 1560900 76546 01/21/00 WHITE,JOEL A 384.00 76547 01/21/00 WILSON,JASON M 1683.00 76548 01/21/00 ZASTROW,GREGG P 2081.00 76549 01/21/00 ZIMMERMANN HOHN,ANN K 2013.00 76550 01/21/00 HEWITT,JOEL A 4197.06 76551 01/21/00 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1520.03 34 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76552 01/21/00 FREBERG,RONALD L 1759977 76553 01/21/00 JONES,DONALD R 1252.17 76554 01/21/00 ELIAS,JAMES G 1824.03 76555 01/21/00 KUNO,MICHAEL R 840.00 76556 01/21/00 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 1725.63 76557 01/21/00 ANDERSON,ROBERT S 1560.62 76558 01/2 1/00 EDSON,DAVID B 1863.67 76559 01/21/00 HELEY,ROLAND B 1533.63 76560 01/21/00 HINNENKAMP,GARY 1541.29 76561 01/21/00 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 1477.63 76562 01/21/00 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 1560.62 76563 01/21/00 RODRIGUEZ,RAUL J 52.00 76564 01/21/00 SOUTTER,CHRISTINE 124.31 76565 01/21/00 THOMPSON,DEBRA J 466989 76566 01/21/00 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1465.63 76567 01/21/00 SCHMIDT,JASON E 1237.06 76568 01/21/00 ANDERSON,EVERETT 489.12 76569 01/21/00 OLSON,ARNOLD G 590.00 76570 01/21/00 OSTROM,MARJORIE 3269.23 76571 01/21/00 WENGER,ROBERT J 1791.23 76572 01/21/00 ADAMS,CAILIN M 30.00 76573 01/21/00 BALLESTRAZZE,THAD M 75.50 76574 01/21/00 BENDER,JAYME L 43.50 76575 01/21/00 BLEESS,PAUL A 52.75 76576 01/21/00 BRANDSTROM,MARY C 87975 35 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76577 01/21/00 BRANDSTROM,RYAN M. 133.00 76578 01/21/00 BUCZKOWSKI,ALAN 53.75 76579 01/21/00 BURTON,JASON E 43.00 76580 01/21/00 DAVISON,LINCOLN R 378.75 76581 01/21/00 DOTY,TRESSA M 46.00 76582 01/21/00 FINN,GREGORY S 1309.63 76583 01/21/00 FITCH,CHRISTOPHER A 41.00 76584 01/21/00 FLUG,ELAINE R 166950 76585 01/21/00 FLUG,MEGAN L 129.38 76586 01/21/00 FRANK,LAURA 278900 76587 01/21/00 GEBHARD,JILLIAN R 126.00 76588 01/21/00 GLASS,DANIEL M 27.00 76589 01/21/00 GLAVAN,JOSEPH P 144.00 76590 01/21/00 GRUBER,SARAH A 140.00 765.91 01/21/00 HARGROVE,AYAN T 53.75 76592 01/21/00 HARGROVE,BRYCE M 53975 76593 01/21/00 HARRIGAN,DAVID A 32.25 76594 01121/00 HAWKES,BRYAN L 42.00 76595 01/21/00 HORNER,JAY B 28.00 76596 01/21/00 HORNER,MATTHEW R 64.50 76597 01/21/00 JANSEN,MARK G 43.00 76598 01/21/00 JANSEN,MICHAEL 94.00 76599 01/21/00 KAREL,BRADLEY M 20.50 76600 01/21/00 KAREL,JULIE E 32925 76601 01/21/00 KENDRICK,BRANDI L 96.00 36 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76602 01/21/00 KLEM,JOSH H 33.75 76603 01/21/00 LINN,MATTHEW 0 33.00 76604 01/21/00 LINN,TERI L 97.88 76605 01/21/00 LUND,ERIC 53.75 76606 01/21/00 LUND,JOEL A 32.25 76607 01/21/00 MACKLEY,COLLEEN A 26.00 76608 01/21/00 MARTINUCCI,ERIN R 33.75 76609 01/21/00 MELTON,JOSEPH T 50.00 76610 01/21/00 MCBRIDE,PATRICK D 202.00 76611 01/21/00 NELSON,JAYME K 33.75 76612 01/21/0.0 NIEMCZYK,BRIAN N 33975 76613 01/21/00 POLASKI,PATRICK R 293.63 76614 01/21/00 PREW,JOHN M 33975 76615 01/21/00 RAS,BRENT A 33.75 76616 01/21/00 ROGERS,MELISSA E 32.25 76617 01/21/00 RYDEEN,BENJAMIN D 45.00 76618 01/21/00 SATTER,BONNIE K 32.50 76619 01/21/00 SCHNOBRICH,LAURIE K 178.50 76620 01/21/00 SHOBERG,KARI A 173.00 76621 01/21/00 SIVERHUS,TIMOTHY 33.75 76622 01/21/00 SOMERS,GREGORY B 175.50 76623 - 01/21/00 SYRING,MATTHEW 32.25 76624 01/21/00 TARR- JR,GUS L 66.00 76625 01/21/00 THOMAS,RUSSELL 30.75 76626 01/21/00 TRENDA,ANNA C 35.00 37 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76627 01/21/00 UNGAR,KRISTOPHER 32.25 76628 01/21/00 VANDERBOSCH,BLAKE R 21.50 76629 01/21/00 WERNER,KATIE M 25.00 76630 01/21/00 GERMAIN,DAVID 1529.63 76631 01/21/00 NADEAU,EDWARD A 3152.83 76632 01/21/00 SCHULTZ,SCOTT M 1316.83 76633 01/21/00, BROWN,LAURIE A 159.80 76634 01/21/00 CONTRERAS,GABRIEL A 129.20 76635 01/21/00 COONS,MELISSA 883.48 76636 01/21/00 ERICKSON,KYLE F 284.00 76637 01/21/00 FALVEY,JENNIFER A 208.20 76638 01/21/00 GLASS,JEAN 790960 76639 01/21/00 HOIUM,SHEILA 922.87 76640 01/21/00 HORWATH,RONALD J 447.74 76641 01/21/00 KARAS,TAMARA A 805.42 76642 01/21/00 OGREN,ALLISON A 81960 76643 01/21/00 RIDLEHOOVER,KATE I 180.20 .76644 01/21/00 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 1251.23 76645 01/21/00 SHOBERG,CARY J 476.14 76646 01/21/00 ABRAHAMSON,BRYAN K 318.27 76647 01/21/00 ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L. 48.00 76648 01/21/00 ANDERSON,JULIE M 732900 76649 01/21/00 ANDERSON,TIMOTHY R 32.75 76650 01/21/00 BACHMAN,NICOLE T 61975 76651 01/21/00 BADEN,MATHIAS 133.17 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 76652 01/21/00 BITTNER,KATIE C 76653 01/21/00 BUCHAN,DAVID M 76654 01/21/00 DAMROW,KELLY C 76655 01/21/00 DEMPSEY,BETH M 76656 01/21/00 DeGRAW,KRYSTAL M 76657 01/21/00 ERICKSON,CAROL A 76658 01/21/00 FERRISE,CHRISTINA M 76659 01/21/00 FONTAINE,ANTHONY 76660 01/21/00 FRETZ,SARAH J 76661 01/21/00 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 76662 01/21/00 HAFNER,ALEXIS J 76663 01/21/00 HAGGERTY,KATHRYN A 76664 01/21/00 HAGSTROM,LINDSEY S 76665 01/21/00 HAWKE,RYAN A 76666 01/21/00 HAWKINS,LISA A 76667 01/21/00 HEINN,REBECCA L 76668 01/21/00 HOLMGREN,LEAH M 76669 01/21/00 HOULE,DENISE L 76670 01/21/00 HUPPERT,ERIN M 76671 01 / 21 / 0 0 IKHAML , JOHN 76672 01/21/00 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 76673 01/21/00 JOHNSON,ROLLAND H 76674 01/21/00 JOHNSON,STETSON 76675 01/21/00 JOHNSON,SUSAN M 76676 01/21/00 JOVONOVICH,TODD R AMOUNT 264.15 258.40 13.60 113.30 280.57 40.40 136.50 369.01 101, 04 239.70 13.10 30.00 13.50 153.25 53.80 455.85 126.33 164.50 173.56 99.29 152.98 34.25 38.00 54.00 81.60 39 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76677 01/21/00 KAHLER,BRADLEY G 52.00 76678 01/21/00 KERSCHNER,JOLENE M 170.30 76679 01/21/00 KLETT,KATIE N 26.00 76680 01/21/00 KOEHNEN, AMY 53 .00 76681 01/21/00 KOEHNEN,MARY B 649.06 76682 01/21/00 KOEPKE,CHARLES E 100.50 76683 01/21/00 KROLL,MARK J 54.40 76684 01 / 21 / 00 KUEHNE , SHEILA R 46-.46 76685 01/21/00 MEISEL,TAMBREY 280.83 76686 01/21/00 MOTZ,ERIN M 199.83 76687 01/21/00 OIREAGAN,CHRISTINE 56.00 76688 01/21/00 OWEN,JONATHAN 171.21 76689 01/21/00 PEHOSKI,JOEL T 62923 76690 01/21/00 REGESTER, DOUG 57.00 76691 .01/21/00 SHERRILL,MASON D 141.10 76692 01/21/00 SIMONSON,JUSTIN M 66.48 76693 01/21/00 SMITLEY,SHARON L 190.00 76694 01/21/00 STEINKE,JACOB P 62.23 76695 01/21/00 SWANER,JESSICA 214.20 76696 01/21/00 THELL,HEIDI 70.00 76697 01/21/00 TIBODEAU,HEATHER J 96.45 76698 01/21/00 VANSTEEN,JENNIFER L 29.93 76699 01/21/00 WARNER,CAROLYN 132.80 767.00 01/21/00 WEDES,CARYL H 128.40 76701 01/21/00 WELTER,ELIZABETH M 124.45 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER - CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT ------ - - - -- 76702 ---- - - - - -- 01/21/00 ------------------------------ WHITE,TIMOTHY M -------- - - - - -- 45.85 76703 01/21/00 WILLIAMS,KELLY M 1068936 76704 01/21/00 WOODMAN,ALICE E 282.10 76705 01 / 21 / 0 0 Z I ELINSKI ,JENNIFER L 113.0 3 7.6706 01/21/00 BOSLEY,CAROL 245.31 76.707 01/21/00 GLASS,GILLIAN 74.18 76708 01/21/00 HANSEN,ANNA K 213.00 76709 01/21/00 HUPPERT,ERICA L _ 21.00 76710 01/21100 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 302.00 76711 01 / 21 / 00 SHERRILL , CAITLIN A 12 0.2 6 76712 01/21/00 ANION, SARAH E 160.08 76713 01/21/00 BEHAN,JAMES 1267.23 76714 01/21/00 BLAKESLEY,JEFFRY D 144.00 76715 01/21/00 BLANCHARD,KEVIN J 36.00 76716 01/21/00 CHAPEAU,GREG M 39.66 76717 01/21/00 DICKSON,MICHAEL W 194.88 76718 01/21/00 DOUGLASS,TOM 216.00 .76719 01/21/00 GRENDZINSKI,DIANE J 103.50 76720 01/21/00 HEMPFER,NICHOLAS W 37.80 76721 01/21/00 JAHN,DAVID J 1338.18 76722 01/21/00 KOSKI,JOHN F 671.18 76723 01/21/00 KYRK,ASHLEY 48.00 76724 01/21/00 KYRK,BREANNA K 116.22 76725 01/21/00 LONETTI,JAMES F 616.34 76726 01/21/00 MATTESON,FRANK M 195.30 41 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76727 01/21/00 MORIN,TROY J 180.00 76728 01/21/00 PRINS,KELLY M 176.40 76729 01/21/00 REILLY,MICHAEL R 676992 76730 01/21/00 SEVERSON,CHRLSTINA M 1.71.86 76731 01 / 21 / 0 0 _ STEINHORST , JEFFREY -4-10-.7 76732 01/21/00 YOUNG,DILLON J 211920 76733 01/21/00 AICHELE,CRAIG J 1152.99 76734 01/21/00 MULVANEY,DENNIS M 1678.43 76735 01/21/00 PRIEM, STEVEN 1552.24 442189.26 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS.REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 ALLENSPACH, SHERRY DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 ANDERSON, CAROLE J DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 CARLE JEANETTE E DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 JAGOE,CAROL DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 OLSON,SANDRA. DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 ALDRIDGE , MARK DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 BOHL,JOHN C DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 FLOR,TIMOTHY DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 EVERSON,PAUL DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 FRAS ER , JOHN DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 OSWALD , ERICK D DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DUCHARME , JOHN DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 PECK, DENNIS L DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 GREW - HAYMAN , JANET M DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 EKSTRAND THOMAS G DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 ROBERTS,KENNETH DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 TAUBN'[AN ,DOUGLAS J DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 EDGE , DOUGLAS DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 LIVINGSTON , JOYCE L DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 PALMA, STEVEN DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 JOHNSON , KEVIN DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 ERI CKSON VIRGINIA A DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 LUTZ,DAVID P DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 FARR, DIANE M DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 NAGEL , BRYAN AMOUNT 339.27 1318.31 1355.23 1355.23 1414.74 2387.27 2 005.64 2523.75 1683.30 2255.17 2313.13 1725.63 1824.03 822.42 2572.72 1869.38 3321.80 1575.04 763.79 2731.59 2153.53 2059.23 1612.62 341.21 1617.62 43 CITY OF'MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE - EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------- - - - --. AMOUNT __---- - - - - -- DIRECT DEPOSIT ---- - - - -- 02/04/00 HELLE , KERRY —.-----.------- -- 2 413.1 l DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 CARVER, NICHOLAS N 18 03.2 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 OSTER, ANDREA J 1465963 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 ANDREWS,SCOTT A 2054.76 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 SAVAGEAU,STEPHEN D 1627925 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 HASSENSTAB,DENISE R 78.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT { 02/04/00 MARTINSON,CAROL F 1527.96 i DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 HIEBERT,STEVEN 2351969 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DUNK, ALI CE 2 0 2 9.6 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 CORNER, AMY L 19 4.2 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 HORSNELL , JUDITH A 1013909 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 SEEGER, GERALD F 3 2 9.5 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 MOREHEAD r JESSICA R 131o50 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 COLEMAN r PHILIP 466953 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 BELDE,STANLEY 2096.94 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 FRY,PATRICIA 1405.63 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 RENSLOW,RITA 157.85 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 BAKKE , LONN A 212 6.10 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 BOWMAN ,RICK A 2045906 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 KOPPEN r MARVIN 339927 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 CHRI STENSEN JODI E D r 5 2 2.7 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 PIKE,GARY K 1627.30 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 I CKE S, SHERI 12 6 0.0 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 HEINZ,STEPHEN J 2026.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/ NELSON , JEAN 9 3 7.6 9 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS.REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/ DIRECT_ DEPOSIT � 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT i 4 0 0 02/0 / DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 .DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT vG/ vet/ vv DIRECT DEPOSIT - 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 .DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT i F 02/04/00 t DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT A u. 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT' -= 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 EMPLOYEE NAME KELLY,LISA TETZLAFF,JUDY A URBANSKI,HOLLY S ZWIEG,SUSAN Co SKRYPEK,JOSHUA L HERBERT,MICHAEL J STOCKTON,DERRELL T MELANDER,JON A ROSSMAN,DAVID A THOMAS— JR,STEVEN PRIEBE,WILLIAM DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES HALWEG R OTIS,MARY ELLEN M CASAREZ,GINA MEYER, GERALD W PARSONS,KURT G JUNG,STEPHANIE J MARUSKA,ERICA NORDQUIST,RICHARD JACKSON,MARY L GAYNOR,VIRGINIA A OLSON,JULIE S SWANSON,LYLE AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 1182.46 601.72 1261.63 1438.43 646.87 2026.43 2026.43 2119.23 2386.08 1514.10 1758.43 1465.63 1505.63 2936.18 534.50 1341.23 2533.12 1530.94 139.2.16 233.55 1653.07 1292.83 356.00 1457.41 2448.48 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 BREHEIM, ROGER W DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 LARSON ,DANIEL J DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 CORCORAN, THERESA M DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 SPANGLER,EDNA E DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 MOORE,VANESSA J DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DeBILZAN,THOMAS C DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 THIENES,PAUL DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 LARSON,DEBRA DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 ANZALDI,MANDY DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 CAL COLLEEN J DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 CARLSON, THERESE DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 LE , SHERYL DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 FAUST ,DANIEL F DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 BAS, GAYLE L DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 KELSEY CONNI E L DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 GUILFOILE,KAREN E DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 POWELL,PHILIP DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 WINGER, DONALD S DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 BANICK, JOHN J DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 KARI S, FLINT D DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 KVAM, DAVID DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 RABBETT KEVIN DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 STEFFEN,SCOTT L DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 THOMALLA,DAVID J DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 BERGERON ,JOSEPH A AMOUNT 1604.03 1489.54 1070.65 420.27 833.96 1247.43 2439.90 329.04 82.25 1849.05 1754.30 3201.32 3528.12 2096.26 1511.30 2129.79 1698.26 3322.37 2614.55 2414.53 2416.77 2197.63 2709.68 4093.43 4218.27 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE.NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 GERVAI S —JR, CLARENCE N 1791 o 3 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 LUKIN , STEVEN J 2183. 6 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 HAIDER, KENNETH G 4 54 0.52 DIRECT DEPOSIT Y d 02/04/00 PRIEFER,WILLIAM 2797.62 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 KANE,MICHAEL R 3216.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 LUNDSTEN,LANCE 2374.77 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M 2465.83 DIRECT DEPOSIT y 02/04/00 ANDERSON,BRUCE 3234951 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 MARUSKA,MARK A 3356935 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 HUTCHINSON , ANN E 17 8 0.0 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 COLEMAN , MELINDA 3123o13 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 GRAF ,MICHAEL 1211.2 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 ROBBINS , AUDRA L 1211o23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 ATKINS , KATHERINE 114 9.6 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 CROSSON LINDA 1628903 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 EASTMAN,THOMAS E 2130.86 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 STAPLES,PAULINE 3383.04 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 S CHLINGMAN , PAUL 18 2 6.4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 HURLEY , STEPHEN 2 2 4 7.0 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 2099.42 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 WENZEL, JAY B 1403.07 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 JOHNSON,MEGAN M 294.93 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 SWANSON,VERONICA 575.90 DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 DOBLAR,RICHARD N 1244.83 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/04/00 STEINHORST,JEFFREY 430.71 47 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76745 02/04/00 CARDINAL,ROBERT J. 385.50 76746 02/04/00 COLLINS,KENNETH V 339927 76747 02/04/00 WASILUK,JULIE A 339.27 76748 02/04/00 ERICSON,MICHAEL A 2394930 76749 02/04/00 HENSLEY,PATRICIA 79.68 76750 02/04/00 MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A 4180.37 76751 02/04/00 WHITE,BARRY T 42.00 76752 02/04/00 CUDE,LARRY J 391.71 76753 02/04/00 DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J 243.93 76754 02/04/00 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 689.16 76755 02/04/00 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 2575.48 76756 02/04/00 NIVEN,AMY S 427.50 76757 02/04/00 JOHNSON,BONNIE 770902 76.758 02/04/00 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1538.05 76759 02/04/00 PALANK,MARY KAY 1527996 76760 02/04/00 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1527996 76761 02/04/00 RYAN,MICHAEL 4594.93 76762 02/04/00 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 2160.58 76763 02/04/00 BARTZ,PAUL 2674.31 76764 02/04/00 BUSACK,DANIEL P 1440.59 76765 02/04/00 CAMPBELL,CRAIG D 1244983 76766 02/04/00 KNEFELKAMP,KARI L 65.00 76767 02/04/00 KONG,TOMMY T 896983 76768 02/04/00 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 2277.07 76769 02/04/00 WATCZAK,LAURA 1936.83 CHECK NUMBER ------ - - - - -- 76770 76771 76772 76773 7677.4 76775 76776 76777 76778 76779 76780 76781 76782 76783 76784 76785 76786 76787 76788 76789 76790 76791 76792 76793 76794 CHECK DATE 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 EMPLOYEE NAME WELCHLIN,CABOT V HALE,TH0MAS M MEEHAN,JAMES HEWITT,JOEL A CHLEBECK,JUDY M FREBERG,RONALD L JONES,DONALD R ELIAS,JAMES G KUNO,MICHAEL R LINDBLOM,RANDAL ANDERSON,ROBERT S EDSON,DAVID B HELEY,ROLAND B HINNENKAMP,GARY LAVAQUE,MICHAEL LINDORFF,DENNIS P RODRIGUEZ,RAUL J SOUTTER,CHRISTINE THOMPSON,DEBRA J WEGWERTH,JUDITH A SCHMIDT,JASON E ANDERSON, EVERETT OLSON,ARNOLD G OSTROM,MARJORIE WENGER, ROBERT J AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 2177042 1650.21 2404.71 2851.04 152 0.03 1650.19 1213.74 1824.03 278.25 1725.6.3 1505.63 2383.90 1533.63 1611.83 1531.57 1505.63 280.00 65.81 509.19 1465.63 1236.80 347.93 370.00 2213.63 1791.23 AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 40.00 65.25 65.50 147.25 133.00 43.00 32.25 375.00 46.00 13090 63 76.50 63.75 282.00 139.75 144.00 88.00 32.25 32.25 13.50 21.50 21.00 32.25 43.00 61.50 53.75 50 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 76795 02/04/00 ADAMS,CAILIN M 76796 02/04/00 BENDER,JAYME L 76797 02/04/00 BLEESS,PAUL A 76798 02/04/00 BRANDSTROM,JULIET M 76799 02/04/00 BRANDSTROM,RYAN M. 76800 02/04/00 BUCZKOWSKI,ALAN 76801 02/04/00 BURTON,JASON E 76802 02/04/00 DAVISON,LINCOLN R 76803 02/04/00 DOTY,TRESSA M 76804 02/04/00 FINN,GREGORY S 76805 02/04/00 FLUG,ELAINE R 76806 02/04/00 FLUG,MEGAN L 76807 02/04/00 FRANK,LAURA 76808 02/04/00 GEBHARD,JILLIAN R . 76809 02/04/00 GLASS,DANIEL M 76810 02/04/00 GLASS,ROBERT P 76811 02/04/00 HARGROVE,AYAN T 76812 02/04/00 HARGROVE,BRYCE M 76813 02/04/00 HARRIGAN,DAVID A 76814 02/04/00 HOFFMANN,STEVEN M 76815 02/04/00 HORNER,JAY B 76816 0 2/ 0 4/ 0 0 JANS EN , MARIA G 76817 02/04/00 JANSEN,MICHAEL 76818 02/04/00 KAREL,BRADLEY M 76819 02/04/00 KAREL,JULIE E AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 40.00 65.25 65.50 147.25 133.00 43.00 32.25 375.00 46.00 13090 63 76.50 63.75 282.00 139.75 144.00 88.00 32.25 32.25 13.50 21.50 21.00 32.25 43.00 61.50 53.75 50 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76820 02/04/00 KLEM,JOSH H 78.75 76821 02/04/00 LANDE,JOSEPH R. 94.50 76822 02/04/00 LINN,MATTHEW O 44.00 76823 02/04/00 LINN,TERI L 68.88 76824 02/04/00 LUND,ERIC 43.00 76825 02/04/00 LUND,JOEL A 36925 76826 02/04/00 MACKLEY,COLLEEN A 19950 76827 02/04/00 MARTINUCCI,ERIN R 33.75 76828 02/04/00 McBRIDE,PATRICK D 190000 76829 02/04/00 NIEMCZYK,ANTHONY R 63.00 76830 02/04/00 NIEMCZYK,BRIAN N 45.00 76831 02/04/00 NORMAN,KENDALL A 120.00 76832 02/04/00 OIBRIEN,SEAN M 25.00 76833 02/04/00 POLASKI,PATRICK R 319.00 76834 02/04/00 PREW,JOHN M 45.00 76835 02/04/00 RAS,BRENT A 90000 76836 02/04/00 RIEPER,TYLER J. 80000 76837 02/04/00 ROGERS,MELISSA E 21.50 76838 02/04/00 SATTER,BONNIE K 26.00 76839 02/04/00 SCHNOBRICH,LAURIE K 168.00 76840 02/04/00 SHOBERG,KARI A 150.50 76841 02/04/00 SIKORA,PAUL T 122.50 76842 02/04/00 SOMERS,GREGORY B 168.75 76843 02/04/00 SPENCER,WILLIAM 90000 76844 02/04/00 SYRING,MATTHEW 73.75 51 52 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76845 02/04/00 TARR— JR,GUS L 33900 76846 02/04/00 TRENDA,ANNA C 21.00 76847 02/04/00 TVEDTEN,ERIK A 90000 76848 02/04/00 UNGAR,KRISTOPHER 103900 76849 02/04/00 VANDERBOSCH,BLAKE R 90.25 76850 02/04/00 VAUGHAN,PATRICK J 81000 76851 02/04/00 WERNER,KATIE M 45.00 76852 02/04/00 GERMAIN,DAVID 1529.63 76853 02/04/00 NADEAU,EDWARD A 3356.35 76854 02/04/00 SCHULTZ,SCOTT M 1440.61 76855 02/04/00 BROWN,LAURIE A 115960 76856 02/04/00 CONTRERAS,GABRIEL A 54.40 76857 02/04/00 COONS,MELISSA 910.53 76858 02/04/00 ERICKSON,KYLE F 298.20 76859 02/04/00 FALVEY,JENNIFER A 179990 76860 02/04/00 GLASS,JEAN 879.35 76861 02/04/00 HOIUM,SHEILA 885923 76862 02/04/00 HORWATH,RONALD J 507.68 76863 02/04/00 KARAS,TAMARA A 704.28 76864 02/04/00 OGREN,ALLISON A 136900 76865 02/04/00 RIDLEHOOVER,KATE I 115.60 76866 02/04/00 SALZBRENNER,HEIDI T 95.20 76867 02/04/00 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 1251923 76868 02/04/00 SHOBERG,CARY J 634e56 76869 02/04/00 ABRAHAMSON,BRYAN K 183.02 52 CHECK NUMBER 76870 76871 76872 76873 76874 76875 76876 76877 76878 76879 76880 76881 76882 76883 76884 76885 76886 76887 76888 76889 76890 76891 76892 76893 76894 CHECK DATE 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00. 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 .02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD... EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L. 186.00 ANDERSON,JULIE M 656.59 ANDERSON,TIMOTHY R 81.88 BACHMAN,NICOLE T 68.25 BITTNER,KATIE C 559062 BUCHAN,DAVID M 601.80 CORMAN,ALLISON G 22.75 DEMPSEY,BETH M . 114.90 DeGRAW,KRYSTAL M 372.12 ERICKSON,CAROL A 20.20 FERRIS E,CHRISTINA M 130. -00 FONTAINE,ANTHONY 405.71 FRETZ,SARAH J 126.73 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 250.43 HAFNER,ALEXIS J 27.84 HAWKE,RYAN A 167935 HAWKINS,LISA A 153.60 HEINN,REBECCA L 46.15 HOLMGREN,LEAH M 253.94 HOULE,DENISE L 202995 HUPPERT,ERIN M 185.64 IKHAML,JOHN 175.08 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 266.45 JOHNSON,STETSON 63.00 JOHNSON,SUSAN M 54.00 53 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 54 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76895 02/04/00 JOVONOVICH,TODD R 57980 76896 02/04/00 KAHLER,BRADLEY G 61.75 7689.7 02/04/00 KERSCHNER,JOLENE M 189.95 76898 02/04/00 KLETT,KATIE N 26.00 76899 02/04/00 KOEHNEN,AMY 36.50 76900 02/04/00 KOEHNEN,MARY B 649.71 76901 02/04/00 KOEPKE,CHARLES E 97.15 76902 02/04/00 KROLL,MARK J 78.20 76903 02/04/00 KUEHNE,SHEILA R 70.80 76904 02/04/00 MEISEL,TAMBREY 272.93 76905 02/04/00 MOTZ,ERIN M 112.26 76906 02/04/00 OIREAGAN,CHRISTINE 100000 76907 02/04/00 OLSON,ABIGAIL E 102.38 76908 02/04/00 OWEN,JONATHAN 177.05 76909 02/04/00 PEHOSKI,JOEL T 147.38 76910 02/04/00 POWERS,JESSICA 284.40 76911 02/04/00 REGESTER, DOUG 40950 76912 02/04/00 SMITLEY,SHARON L 190000 76913 02/04/00 STEINKE,JACOB P 75933 76914 02/04/00 SUNDHEIM,CAROLYN J. 69.8.8 76915 02/04/00 SWANER,JESSICA 116966 76916 02/04/00 THELL,HEIDI 18900 76917 02/04/00 TIBODEAU,HEATHER J 40.28 76918 02/04/00 WARNER,CAROLYN 134920 76919 0 2 / 0 4 / 0 0 WEDES , CARYL H - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- 111 - - 0 54 55 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 76920 02/04/00 WELTER,ELIZABETH M 150.65 76921 02/04/00 WHITE,TIMOTHY M 88.43 76922 02/04/00 WILLIAMS,KELLY M 689.11 76923 02/04/00 WOODMAN,ALICE E 245.75 76924 02/04/00 ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L 147.28 76925 02/04/00 BOSLEY,CAROL 262.98 76926 02/04/00 GLASS,GILLIAN 197.48 76927 02/04/00 HANSEN,ANNA K 279.00 76928 02/04/00 HUPPERT,ERICA L 75.00 76929 02/04/00 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 276900 76930 02/04/00 SHERRILL,CAITLIN A 22.75 76931 02/04/00 ANTON,SARAH E 173.42 76932 02/04/00 BEHAN,JAMES 1451.43 76933 02/04/00 BLAKESLEY,JEFFRY D 144.00 76934 02/04/00 BLANCHARD,KEVIN J 36.00 76935 02/04/00 BOTTOLFSON,COLLIN R. 102900 7.6936 02/04/00 CHAPEAU,GREG M 400.07 76937 02/04/00 DICKSON,MICHAEL W 613.06 76938 02/04/00 DOUGLASS,TOM .234900 76939 02/04/00 GRENDZINSKI,DIANE J 129.00 .76940 02/04/00 HEMPFER,NICHOLAS W 18.90 76941 02/04/00 HERMES,MARK L 84.00 76942 02/04/00 JAHN,DAVID J 1314.71 76943 02/04/00 KOSKI,JOHN F 671.18 76944 02/04/00 KYRK,ASHLEY 72900 55 CHECK NUMBER 76945 76946 76947 76948 76949 76950 76951 76952 76953 76954 CHECK DATE 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 02/04/00 EMPLOYEE NAME LONETTI,JAMES F MATTESON,FRANK M MORIN,TROY J PRINS,KELLY M REILLY,MICHAEL R SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M YOUNG,DILLON J AICHELE,CRAIG J MULVANEY,DENNIS M PRIEM, STEVEN A. AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 671.18 224.74 168.00 214.20 680.98 152.03 112.20 1152.99 1678.43 1494.43 329179.39 56 AGENDA NO. GZ AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: TRANSFERS FROM TAX INCREMENT FUNDS DATE: January 28, 2000 PROPOSAL Action by Council Date &dorsed Modified Rejmted It is proposed that the Council authorize the appropriate 1999 budget adjustments and 1999 transfers totaling $306,885 from the Tax Increment Funds to the Debt Service Funds. BACKGROUND Annually transfers are made from the Tax Increment Funds to finance expenditures in other funds. The 1999 transfers from the Tax Increment Funds will finance debt service costs on tax increment bonds totaling $306,885 in three debt service funds. A breakdown by fund and comparison with the original budget is listed on the attachment. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the appropriate 1999 budget adjustments and 1999 transfers totaling $306,885 from the Tax Increment Funds to the Debt Service Funds. P:\FINANCE\WP\AGN\TIF99.WPD FILE NAME: TIFTRAN LOCATION: C: \123R5W \MISC DATE: 28 -Jan -2000 PREPARED BY: DF TRANSFERS FROM TAX INCREMENT FUNDS TO DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (To eliminate cash deficits) OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT FROM TIF FUNDS: Fund #412 Economic Development District 1 -3 0 Fund #413 Housing District 1 -1 103 Fund #414 Housing District 1 -2 214,180 Fund #415 Housing District 1 -3 51 370 40,485 109,460 131 168,960 135,000 91,570 0 40,490 412 -999 -4999 28,040 413 -999 -4999 (79,180) 414 -999 -4999 (51, 900 415 -999 -4999 Total transfers 369,440 370,360 306,885 (62,550) *PER PAFINANCE \BUDMISC \TRSF9900 1999 1999 1999 BUDGET CHANGES BUDGET* RE -EST.* ACTUAL AMOUNT ACCT. NO. OPERATING TRANSFERS IN TO DEBT SERVICE FUNDS: Fund #321 1989 Tax - Exempt Tax Inc. Bonds 18,230 18,230 5 (12,330) 321 -999 -3999 Fund #326 1992 Tax Increment Bonds 0 168,960 11,400 11,400 326 -999 -3999 Fund #328 1993 Tax Increment Bonds 351,210 182,810 289,585 (61,620) 328 -999 -3999 Total transfers 369,440 370,000 306,885 (62,550) OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT FROM TIF FUNDS: Fund #412 Economic Development District 1 -3 0 Fund #413 Housing District 1 -1 103 Fund #414 Housing District 1 -2 214,180 Fund #415 Housing District 1 -3 51 370 40,485 109,460 131 168,960 135,000 91,570 0 40,490 412 -999 -4999 28,040 413 -999 -4999 (79,180) 414 -999 -4999 (51, 900 415 -999 -4999 Total transfers 369,440 370,360 306,885 (62,550) *PER PAFINANCE \BUDMISC \TRSF9900 FILE NAME: TIFTRAN LOCATION: C: \123R5W\MISC DATE: 28- Jan -2000 PREPARED BY: DF TAX INCREMENT TRANSFERS ON 12 -31 -99 Fund Name Balance Fund No. 12 -29 -99 Fund 412 (5 5 (11,334.02) 11,400.00 (289,494.51) 34, 585.00 120, 000.00 135, 000.00 40,485.00 (40,485.00) 131,767.95 (131,400.00) 209, 214.11 (135,000.00) 104,231.95 Fund 413 Fund 414 Fund 415 1989 Tax Increment Bonds 321 1992 Tax Increment Bonds 326 1993 Tax Increment Bonds 328 Economic District 1 -3 412 Housing District 1 -1 413 Housing District 1 -2 414 Housing District 1 -3 415 Total Adjusted Balance 70.94 65.98 90.49 0.00 367.95 74,214.11 104,231.95 179, 041.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 179, 041.42 1989 Tax Increment Bonds- financed b Economic District 1 -3 ends 12 -31 -1999 Housing District 1 -3 ends 12 -31 -2012 1992 Tax Increment Bonds- financed by Housing District 1 -1 ends 12 -31 -2001 Housing District 1 -2 ends 12 -31 -2001 1993 Tax Increment Bonds- financed by Economic District 1 -3 ends 12 -31 -1999 Housing District 1 -1 ends 12 -31 -2001 Housing District 1 -2 ends 12 -31 -2001 Housing District 1 -3 ends 12 -31 -2012 Transfers in From AGENDA NO. G3 TO: City Manager AGENDA REPORT FROM: Finance Director RE: BUDGET CHANGES FOR POLICE GRANT DATE: February 1, 2000 Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified Rejected In November, 1999 the Police Department received $14,226 under the federal Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program. The money was spent on shotguns and protective head gear under the provisions of the grant. It is recommended that the Council approve the appropriate 1999 budget adjustments. C: Don Winger Mike Ryan PAFINANCE \WP\AGN \99GRANT.WPD AGENDA NO. G 4. AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director��� RE: CARRYOVER OF 1999 APPROPRIATIONS TO 2000 DATE: February 3, 2000 Action by Council Date �nd�d offic d Rejected It has been past practice to permit the carryover from one year to the next of unspent monies for specific purposes. This involves reductions in the 1999 Budget and corresponding increases in the 2000 Budget. Department heads have requested the following General Fund carryovers: 1999 Acct. No. Department (2000 t. No.) For City Manager's Office General Government City Clerk Fire Department $2,530 101 -102 -4630 Purchase of storeroom lateral files 2 101- 119 -4640 Purchase of artwork for City Hall common areas and cable television equipment 23,345 101- 301 -4480 Re- codification of city ordinances 2 101- 301 -4630 Purchase of office equipment 1 101- 303 -4730 Originally budgeted for building (101- 303 -4630) improvements; to be used for purchase of second passport camera 11 101- 404 -4640 Turn -out gear for 11 firefighters that transferred to the Oakdale Fire Department AGENDA REPORT Carryover of 1999 Appropriations to 2000 February 3, 2000 Page 2 Public Works 32 5 725 Parks and Recreation 4,270 Community Dev. 101- 501 -4490 Study to meet PCA requirements for clean up of old city dump 101 -502 -4180 Additional sand and salt required due to above average January snowfall 101 -502 -4220 Originally budgeted for signs; to be (101 -502 -4640) used for purchase of larger format sign cutting machine which is now required 101- 502 -4759 Funds to finish minor storm sewer repairs 101- 604 -4480 Originally budgeted for fees for (101 -604 -4220) service; to be used for 12 outdoor interactive signs at Nature Center 101- 604 -4720 Boundary fence at Nature Center 101- 701 -4480 Copying updated Comprehensive Land Use Plan 101- 701 -4490 White Bear Avenue Corridor Study (101- 702 -4490) 101- 702 -4490 White Bear Avenue Corridor Study 101- 703 -4490 Maplewood Mall and White Bear (101- 702 -4490) Avenue market study General Fund Total • 1 800 1 2 5,800 10,100 4i114,JU5 In addition to the above, carryover requests have been received for the following other funds: 1999 Acct. No. Fund Amount (2000 Acct. No.) For Hazardous Materials Fund $27,890 204 - 112 -xxxx Sewer Lift Station No. 9 Project Fund 641,535 423 - 000 -4759 Development of hazmat response team Amount needed to finish project AGENDA REPORT Carryover of 1999 Appropriations to 2000 February 3, 2000 Page 3 Data Processing Fund 580 16,000 $686,005 703 - 118 -4390 Tuition reimbursement for MIS /GIS technician 703- 118 -4430 To upgrade remote access for 13 sites connected to city computer network Total for other funds It is recommended that the City Council approve these carryover requests. hu PARNANCEMMAGMBUDGCARR AGENDA NO. GS Action by Council Date AGENDA REPORT Endorsed Modified Rejected M -mom TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director � RE: TRANSFER TO CLOSE DEBT SERVICE FUND FOR 1979 BOND ISSUE DATE: February 4, 2000 PROPOSAL It is proposed that effective 12 -31 -99 Debt Service Fund #316 for the 1979 Improvement Bonds be closed by a transfer in of $545.62 from the General Fund and that the appropriate budget adjustments be approved. BACKGROUND The final principal and interest payments have been made on the 1979 Improvement Bonds. The current deficit in the debt service fund for the bond issue is $545.62. This deficit could be eliminated by a tax levy payable in 2001 or by a transfer from the General Fund. Due to the relatively small size of the deficit, a transfer from the General Fund is the best option. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that effective 12 -31 -99 Debt Service Fund #316 for the 1979 Improvement Bonds be closed by a transfer in of $545.62 from the General Fund and that the appropriate budget adjustments be approved. PAF1 NANCE \WP\AGN \DEBT99.WPD Agenda Item # C7 4 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City Clerk RE: Temporary Gambling Resolution DATE: February 5, 2000 Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified Rejected American Legion Post 577, 1129 Arcade Street, Saint Paul, is requesting a temporary (one day) gambling permit for July 30, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., at the Battle Creek Regional Park, 2300 Upper Afton Road. The beneficiary will be American Legion Baseball, Veterans Welfare. In order for the State of Minnesota to issue a temporary license, approval of the following resolution from the City is required. RESOLUTION BE IT HEREBY'' RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the temporary premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for .American Legion Post 577, to operate at the Battle Creek Regional Park, 2300 Upper Afton Road, Maplewood, Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaining approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. Agenda Item # G 7 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City Clerk RE: Gambling Resolution DATE: February S, 2000 Action by Council Date WIN McMed R tsnrtwd Merrick Companies needs to renew their Lawful Gambling License with the State of Minnesota, which requires a resolution from the City of Maplewood. Their gambling is conducted at The Rock, 2029 Woodlyn Avenue, and Garritys, 1 696 White Bear Avenue. RESOLUTION BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for Merrick Companies to operate at The Rock, 2029 Woodlyn Avenue, and Garritys, 1696 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. AGENDA ITEM NO G $ Agenda Item # MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City Clerk RE: Gambling Resolution DATE: February 5, 2000 Action by Cow Date Endorsed Modified ReJected Maplewood Athletic Association needs to renew their Lawful Gambling License with the State of Minnesota which requires a resolution from the City. Their gambling is conducted at The Bird, 3035 White Bear Avenue and Guldens Roadhouse, 2999 N. Highway 61. RESOLUTION BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the Maplewood Athletic Association to operate at Guldens Roadhouse, 2999 N. Highway 61, Maplewood, Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. slow : , .:: �:::>.>_ ��: F.. �..........> 8s'; iY?:`,.... ��.:,........,,....:...> �2a. �.. ..,.. : > ................... Fez ;;.,..,........:?:�rG <'1i:.. >. ANKENY KELL ARCHITECTS January 27, 2000 Mr. Bruce Anderson "Director of Parks and Recreation City of Maplewood Maplewood, MN 55109 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING Re: Maplewood Community Center Addition Recommendation for award of Special Inspection and Testing Services; Window Testing Services Dear Bruce: Ankeny Kell Architects has reviewed proposals submitted by Braun Intertec and Architectural Testing Inc. and recommends acceptance for "Special Structural Testing and Inspections" and "Window Performance Testing ". The proposal submitted by Braun Intertec for "Special Structural Testing and Inspections" includes the work identified in the contract documents and noted as being provided by the Owner. These services are required, by the "Uniform Building Code" (UBC), to be provided by an independent testing agency, and are reviewed for conformance with the UBC by the building official prior to issuance of a building permit. The proposal submitted by Architectural Testing Inc. for window performance testing is based on testing criteria specified in the contract documents and specified to be provided by the Owner. This testing is not mandatory but is customary and prudent to identify problems and reduce the risk of water leaks and damage after the building is occupied. The proposed tests are limited to water testing (hose stream). Air infiltration & structural testing are accepted as represented by tests conducted by an Independent Testing Laboratory for the product manufacturer. All re- testing of failed tests will be at the expense of the contractor. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely,,,-,,-- A ENY KE ARCHITECTS, P.A. Rich d J. Dufresne Project Manager 821 RAYMOND AVENUE SUITE 400 ST. PAUL, MN. 55114 612 645 -6806 612 645 -0079 FAX TestAward.doc ARCHITECTURAL TES ING INC. 587 First Street SW • New Brighton, MN 55112 web www.testa,ti.com • Facsimile 651 - 636 -3843 • Telephone 651- 636 -3835 January 27, 2000 Mr. Richard Dufresne Ankeny Kell Architects, P.A. 821 Raymond Avenue, Suite 400 Saint Paul, Minnesota .55114 Re: Maplewood Community Center Dear Mr. Dufresne: Thank you for your recent request for proposal. We are pleased to furnish you with the following work plan and cost estimate. Project: Maplewood Community Center Maplewood, Mi nnesota Test Required: Testing will be conducted in accordance with Section 1.4, Paragraph (K), of project specifications per AAMA 501.2 - 83, "Field Check of Curtainwalls for Water Leakage. Based on our review of the project, one bay is located in an accessible area off of an adjacent roof level. This would be a logical area to select for testing. Furnished By Others: - Access to exterior roof area. - Access to water supply (5/8" hose bib). - = Unobstructed access to the interior (we recommend testing be conducted prior to application of the interior sill stool to facilitate observations for water entry). Furnished By ATI: - Fully- equipped field truck as necessary to conduct testing in accordance with the work plan outlined herein. - Technician(s) as required to conduct testing in accordance with the work plan outlined herein. - Formal report summarizing our findings. Fees: We are prepared to conduct testing of the window /curtain wall area located off the roof area for a fee of $1,250. Schedule: We request a minimum of two weeks advance notice prior to the scheduled testing date. Thank you for the opportunity of submitting our estimate of fees for your consideration. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or are in need of any additional information. Sincerely, HITECTURAL TESTING, INC. E niel P. Braun DPB /,fib Director of Regional Operations ACCEPTED BY: (Signed) (Date) Laboratories in Pennsylvania, Minnesota & California BRAUN SM INTERTEC January 19, 2000 Mr. Richard J. Dufresene Ankeny Kell Architects, P.A. 821 Raymond Avenue, Suite 400 St. Paul, MN 55114 Dear Mr. Dufresene: Braun Intertec Corporation 245 East Roselawn Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55117-1943 651 -487 -3245 Fax: 487 -1812 Engineers *and Scientists Serving the Built and Natural Environments° Project BBXX- 00 -009A Re: Cost Estimate for Special Inspections and Construction Testing Services for the Proposed Addition to the Maplewood Community Center, Maplewood, Minnesota. We look forward to being part of the project team for this project. Although a construction schedule was not available, we have formulated an estimate based on our review of the plans and . specifications that were provided. Because a construction schedule was_ not available, we have made some assumptions as to the time needed on -site, number of trips, and quantity of tests. After you have reviewed this estimate, we recommend that we meet with the project team to discuss the estimate and provide any clarifications to our proposed work scope. This estimate is being presented in duplicate so that one copy can be signed and returned as an authorization to proceed and for our files. If you have any questions please call Keith Rosvold at 651- 487 -7012. Sincerely, Braun Intertec Corporation Keith S. Rosvold, PE, PG Senior Project Engineer - Geologist Attachment: Cost Estimate Tabulations ksr:kahlprop1b0009a.doc . Ankeny Kell Architects, PA Proposal BBXX- 00 -009A January 19, 2000 Page 2 Work Scope Inspection and Testing Requirements We understand this project was designed using the Special Inspections provisions of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701. Section 1400, Quality Control and the individual sections in the project specifications outlines the required inspections and tests. Based on our review, applicable sections include, but are not limited to: Section Section 2200. Earthwork, Section xxxx Concrete Reinforcement, Section 3300 Concrete Testing, Section 4810 Special Inspection of Masonry, Section 5120 Structural Steel, and Section xxxxf Sprayed Fire- Resistive Materials Cost Estimate Tabulations A cost estimate tabulation is attached. Our quantity estimates shown in each section are based on our project schedule assumptions, the requirements of the project specifications, and our experience with similar projects. Monitoring Construction Vesting Costs As part of our project management services, we will monitor and track the construction testing costs. Monthly invoices will provide a construction testing Budget Up -date. This will help both you and our project manager monitor testing costs. At appropriate benchmarks, say 50 and 80 percent completion, we will contact you and your consultants to discuss the construction progress and budget. Signature Page Costs presented in this proposal are based on the assumption that the proposal will be authorized within 30 days and that the project will be completed within the proposed schedule. If the project is not authorized within 30 days, we may need to modify the cost estimate. If the project cannot be completed within the proposed schedule due to circumstances beyond our control, revising the cost estimate may be required for completion of the remaining tasks. Terms on payment for services are due upon receipt of invoice with interest added to unpaid balances, in accordance with the General Conditions which are a part of this proposal. Ankeny Kell Architects, PA Proposal BBXX- 00 -009A January 19, 2000 Page 3 Acceptance of Proposal Please proceed according to the above stated terms and General Conditions: Date Clients' Name Authorized Signature, Title Prepared 1/12/00 Cost Estimate Tabulation for Construction Testing Maplewood Community Center Addition Tahle l Estimated Costs Page 1 of 2 Code Service Description Estimated Units for Project Hourly or Unit Cost Project Extension ........ ........ .. .................... .......... ........... .0t ... . �. 1 '' y�y� . .. . ....... .............. ....... �:Li !J a iIf .............. .lit. 1306 Excavation Observations 1.0 days at 4.0 hours each 4.0 hours $ 54.00 . .. ...................... $ 216.00 1307 Compaction Testing 1.0 trips at 2.5 hours each 2.5 hours $ 45.00 $ 112.50 1308 Rental of Nuclear Density Equipment 1.0 trips at 2.5 hours each 2.5 hours $ 15.00 $ 37.50. 1861 Trip Charge 2 trips $ 21.00 $ 42.00 1318 Standard Proctor 1 tests $ 92.00 $ 92.00 Subtotal $ 612.50 : :. ........ . ....... ........................................... . r _..: . ......... ........................................ :::::::::: ......... ..................................... jj T ......... ................ ....... ........... .................. ............... .. ....... ..... ...... ................ ................... .5: }:.::: - 1, l 1 g . ....... ................................................. P�: s .!✓ t 'l? 1360 Footings Slabs Concrete Reinforcement Inspections 1.0 days at 2.5 hours each 2.0 days at 2.0 hours each 6.5 hours ...... $ 5 4.0 0 ............................... $ 351.00 1861 Trip Charge 3 trips $ 21.00 $ 63.00 Subtotal $ 414.00 .............................. .............................. . . ....... . . (�[� .......... ed don- ....... ... ........................ . ............ ........................ Ct :: r::•::•:::•: v::::; :;: }.:;::; { ::::•:ti•:;:;:.::G::{ :v:•:::ti :tiff ::::.:'::•::•::ti :':•:•:: :: ::ti•::•:•:•:ti ::::..:.:::.::.:::•:::.:.. ;....:: . ...... ................. st n ........... ................. 1307 Footings Slabs 1V isc. Quality Control Testing of Concrete 1.0 pours at 3.0 hours each 2.0 pours a t 3.0 hours each 1.0 pours at 3.0 hours each 12 hours $ 54.00 ............................ $ 648.00 1361 C Sample Pickup (includes trip charge) 2 trips $ 45.00 $ 90.00 1364 Concrete Curing and Compressive Strength Testing 5 sets at 4 cylinders each 20 tests $ 13.00 $ 260.00 1861 JTrip Charge 4 trips $ 21.00 $ 84.00 Subtotal $ 1,082.00 4 ... ...... .... ..................................... ........................ .......... ... .............. .......... ............. . ..... .... t ..'s tet. 0 p ........ ............. P ................... it. � 1403 Special Inspections of Masonry Construction 4.0 days at 1.0 hours each 4.0 hours $ 54.00 $ 216.00 1412 Compressive Strength Testing of Grout 3.0 tests with 3.0 samples each 9 tests $ 35.00 $ 315.00 1861 1 Trip Charge T 4 trips $ 21.00 $ 84.00 Subtotal $ 615.00 F:wpdata/inbox/jmk/Dufresne.xis Prepdred 1/12/00 Ra 2 of 2 ...................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. . . .... .......... ........... ........................................... .......... ....... ....... : 1 n : . . .............................. ...... ............. Q U . ........... .............................................. Ws P 00ft U ........ .................. .. r. i C . t . .... .................... 4.1'... ..... , ` ::: . V. . ................. ....... ........ .......... ...... ......... ....... ...... .......... 1600. Field - Special Inspections, Structural Steel 3.0 weeks at 4. hours each 12. hours $ 54.00 ............ 648-.00 Section Special Inspection of Concrete Reinforcement Structural Steel Final Report I report $ 250.00 250.00 .1664 T rip Char (from Edina) 3 trips, $ 40.00 $ 120.00 Subtotal $ 1,018.00 ................. ... ................ .... ........ .... . ....................... ................. :: t ..... . ........ .......... ............ ...... ........ .................... ........... I - ... ........ ........ ...... A . ............ ........ .......... ... ..... ..6 ........... ..... I ........ .......... e . .:. . . ........................ .... ....... '.o . .. . . -U Ai� . .................... b Vr ............... ......... ... ............... ......... ... ........ 1781 Fireproofin Observations 2. da at 3.0 hours each 6.0 hours $ 54.00 $ 324.00 1783 Cohesion/Adhesion Testin 0 tests $ - $ - 1784 Fireproofin Densit 10 tests $ 28.00 $ 280.00 1861 ITrip Charge .. 2 trip $ .21.00 $ .42,00 Subtotal 646.00 ..................... ................. 6 ..... .................................................................. ............................................................... ............................. .... .......... .. ....... .... ........ .......... ..... W .... .. ............. ................ .... . .......... X :M.:. ....... .............. .............. ........... ...... i e ..6 .................. .... .............. ................ ....................... . .......... .............. ........ ...... . .......... ..................................... ............... ........ ...... 6 ............... .......... 226 Project Manager 4 hours $ 84.00 $ 336.00 228 Senior Project Mana I hours $ 98.00 $ 98.00 238 Project Assistant (word proces hours $ 33.00 264.00 Subtotal $ 698.00 Project Summar Section 2200 Earthwork, Construction Testin 612.50 Section Special Inspection of Concrete Reinforcement 414.00 Section 3300 Concrete Testin $ 1,082.00 S ection 4 810 Inspection and Testin of Masonr $ 615.00 Section 5 12 0 Inspection and. Testin of Structural Steel $ L018.00 Section Inspection and Testin of Fireproofin $ 646.00 Project Mana $ 698.00 Estimated Total 5 F:wpdata/inboxrJmk/Dufresne.x1s 1; .5 FAX �'� MPLi� QTR 11/4 1 1f i ■ Ankeny ■ r chtects , P s 821 1jaymon Avenue, Suits 400 S t. PaU MN $5114 (6 .51) 5 - 6806 (rase) 645 -0079 FAX FAX Transmittal Tea: Tom Erman Company; a lewood Community Center Phone: Taletax: �t l - 779 -9608 Pages Sett (inclu this one): 4 Apf QED, Fromlo Dick Du tresne Da %Time: 2/3100 Project Nook 98007r0l Project: MCC Expansion Original to follow by mail: M Remarkep 'Torn: Thy ,u p ro p osal r osal from JS0C for AKA P fOPOSAI Request #1 appears reasonable for the sails oorre ction work req AKA roornmends approval for the work t o proceed. Upon you verbal � a pproval, AKA will d ive written authorization to JSCC tO proceed, please call with any questions 6551 - 645 -6806. Thanks. COPY to: r 13y: FAX 02/03/00 14:00 FAX 612 779 9608 MPLWOOD COMM CTR U,4, U.1.1 U 1nu Lu. Lo r .8l W.L V%w W "Acr P ■G s ee i s I I i • , A C ONST R U C T i ow J Febmaiy 2. MOO C I fir. Dick D ofissno_ ' 121 TUwM A Stito 400 - t �t 5 1 14 RA: M Col=unity Ceiftr Additi a D Dicky , ` t *ot I go Wo we & to q Yid fbIlo � Semple � 9 S 3l9� 195 9 , � S 16&d jW m St,,..,l Cotucdcn 76 f T ai '19 atz&W fOr YOur TMY Coc ft P.0 j ect I T R 1410 SyWafh S # 01'" P84 minnesita sally (65x) 064766 Fes.+ (561) 4=4 r =P —f1 -nn W n nd:19 M 01.1 1003 11-A Equal OppWtYPlb KMPww r. 02 02/03/00 14;00 FAX 612 779 9608 MPLWOOD COMM CTR U& I U i.1 / U U LAl LJ J. W An V L'X t1 M 1 it M't M Sd !r l V i Ah",WJ i cb&%y i jk4f%j 46 V i AIL ivi■�n.■=w+m.. a•n- -- '6; LE 004VAT 91 82 2004/004 %NJ v%Prs PJ Dl s N EAL e PIC Tn + g IM 55107 F 1 -i DAM; VI IL R-1 ice MUM wa i e BO DAM. Wa tqc=i ad of ft" 1 - who mud s�e1 c / ` p V ' Am . xo4 ' 1t � ago► � . E xpo tit w" dw maorw or Vmmlor boakf9H W �G- t � v� v - Datc I r i � f ;pAwopwa ! WED 04:18 sM G3 P, D CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS P.O. Box 912 SYOSSET, NY 11791 516- 624 -7885 516 -624 -3145 FAX SOUTHERN REGION 4200 N. OCEAN DRIVE SUITE 1103 -2 RIVIERA BEACH, FL 33404 800-625 -7885 WESTERN REGION P.O. BOX 401 B LACKDUCK, MN 56630 800-625 -7885 INTERNET WWW.BAYFIREWORKS.COM BOOM@ BAYFIREWORKS.COM WORLD CLASS CREDITS WISCONSIN SESQUICENTENNIAL / /f( ttt�Sti{ I i METS FIREWORKS NIGHT fz ' & M o Ju l x MONTMA POINT UGHTHOUSE MUSWM BICENTENNIAL GALA � 0i WINTER OLYMPIC CHALLENGE NEW YORK CITY SUMMER KICKOFF BATEST BAYFEST CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 20TH ANNIVERSARY ALBANY NY k � STAR SPANGLED BANNER PROJECT "S ABRINA" VOTH HARRISON FORD s o - W - Wednesday, January 05, 2000 Mr. Mike Graf City of Maplewood Parks &Recreation Dept. 2100 White Bear Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mike: We would like to thank you for selecting Bay Fireworks to design and produce your upcoming fireworks event. Enclosed herewith are the contracts for your fireworks display. Please sign both copies and return them to our office as quickly as possible. Upon receipt of the contracts , we will sign ur copy and return it to � y you for your files. The prompt return of your contract, along with the p required deposit, will enable us to order your insurance certificate and q to set the wheels in motion for your display. Also enclosed is our Display Site Plan Questionnaire. You will note that we require directions to your fireworks site from the nearest interstate. We would appreciate receiving this at least 20 days prior to show time. Should there be a need to make minor changes on the contract, please make those changes in ink and initial each change. After review and approval of the changes, we shall initial them also. Again, we want to thank you for your business, and look forward to providing you with a great fireworks display. est regards, r D ede Arap akis Director, Customer Relations Enclosures D GA: mnn 0IN INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FAIRS & ExP osrnONS ♦ *� l.� r PYROTECHNIC CHNIC GUILD INTERNATIONAL W W NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION `- .-- ,'•.III INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL FESTIVALS ASSOCIATION OF AND EVENTS FIRST NIGHT AMUSEMENT PARKS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL & ATTRACTIONS 0IN INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FAIRS & ExP osrnONS ♦ *� l.� r PYROTECHNIC CHNIC GUILD INTERNATIONAL W W NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION BAY FIREWORKS INC. DISPLAY SITE PLAN QUESTIONNAIRE t tt=' SPONSOR: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, Parks and Recreation Department, 2100 Bear Avenue, Maplewood, MN 55109 Display Date: Rain Date: Budget: Display Location: Time of Display: IMPORTANT: PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE PLAN FOR YOUR EVENT LOCATION, INDICATING WITH AN X THE EXACT SPOT WHERE FIREWORKS ARE TO BE SET -UP. Local Fire Marshal: Telephone No: Pager No: Crew Contact Person: Telephone No: Pager No: The Following information is necessary in order for us to provide your community or organization with a display that conforms with fireworks safety regulations and for the issuance of your insurance certificate. DISTANCES, IN FEET, FROM THE FIRING AREA TO THE FOLLOWING: FEET SPECTATORS, AUDIENCE OR PARKED CARS .................... ............................... OCCUPIED BUILDINGS (HOMES, APARTMENTS, ETC.)...... see see see ... ..e es* 9 * 9 see ... ... . PUBLIC BUILDINGS (SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS, CHURCHES, ETC.) ...................... TEMPORARY EVENT SET -UPS (CONCESSIONS, TENTS, ETC.) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..a 008 MAINPARKING AREAS .................................................. ............................... . HIGHWAYSOR ROADS .................................................. ............................... . OVERHEAD OBJECTS (POWER LINES, LIGHT POLES, TREES, ETC ..................... FUELSTORAGE .............................................................. ............................... PLEASE PROVIDE DIRECTIONS FROM NEAREST INTERSTATE TO DISPLAY SITE. A MAP WOULD ALSO BE HELPFUL. Local Motels /Hotels: Telephone Nos. Signature Date Title: IMPORTANT: Please return this completed document to our office at least 30 days prior to your display date. Please initial each page, and sign the last page. 4 Initial here: Sponsor Bay Fireworks 01, -q*%Q /.,i.0 America's World Class Fireworks Leader FIREWORKS SALES AGREEMENT Display Date: July 4, 2000 AGREEMENT made this day January 5, 2000 by and between BAY FIREWORKS, INC., whose address is PO. Box 912, Syosset, New York 11791 (hereinafter "BAY FIREWORKS "); and CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,' Parks and =Recreation Department, 2100 Bear Avenue, Maplewood, MN 55109 (hereinafter "SPONSOR ") WHEREAS, BAY FIREWORKS sells fireworks and conducts exhibitions of its products; and WHEREAS, SPONSOR wishes to purchase fireworks from BAY FIREWORKS and BAY FIREWORKS wishes to sell fireworks to SPONSOR: WHEREAS, SPONSOR wishes to retain the services of BAY FIREWORKS as sole fireworks supplier and producer to conduct an exhibition of the fireworks purchased from BAY FIREWORKS; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions and covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: l . DATE & LOCATION. BAY FIREWORKS shall sell and SPONSOR shall purchase the fireworks as set forth on the proposal previously submitted and made a part hereof ( "Fireworks " for delivery by BAY FIREWORKS on 7/4/2000 to the following location: Hazelwood Park 2. EXHIBITION: On the delivery date specified in Paragraph 1, BAY FIREWORKS shall set -up, staff and fire the fireworks at the Exhibition Location. The display will be under the supervision of a BAY FIREWORKS trained technician. It is agreed that BAY FIREWORKS shall be the sole fireworks supplier and producer for the event contracted for herein 3. COST & PA YMENTS: TOTAL AGREEMENT PRICE $10,000.00 The total sum of $ 10,000.00 shall be due and payable as follows: a. The sum of $ 5,000.00 upon execution and delivery of this contract. b. Balance of the total sales (and service contract price if applicable): $ 5,000.00 plus any taxes or any other permits and fees that may be applied to this sale shall be paid not later than five business days prior to the display. 4. INCLEMENT WEATHER: If the delivery and/or display of the fireworks is postponed by reason of inclement weather, same shall be re- scheduled to the Inclement Weather Date set forth below, in which event a rescheduling charge in an amount equal to 10% of the contract price shall be added to the balance due to cover additional expenses incurred by BAY FIREWORKS. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that in the event the fireworks are unpacked and set up before any inclement weather, or if there is no Inclement Weather Scheduled, the said display of fireworks will be carried out in the best possible manner, without any deductions whatever from the above mentioned Cost & Payments (section #3). Any request made by SPONSOR for rescheduling shall be received by BAY FIREWORKS not later than 12:01 A.M. on fireworks delivery date. INCLEMENT WEATHER DATE: `_. �t L r" - 2 c c i C) 5. SPONSOR'S AGENT: Mr. Mike Graf (651) 772 - 8452 shall be designated as SPONSOR agent to whom all questions and inquiries shall be relayed. SPONSOR agent shall be the only agent of SPONSOR authorized to request inclement weather rescheduling of the delivery and exhibition of the Fireworks on the part of SPONSOR. 6. MATERIALS & DELIVERY: BAY FIREWORKS will deliver all Fireworks materials purchased by SPONSOR to display site. 7. EXHIBITION PLANNER CHECKLIST: It is agreed and understood by SPONSOR that the delivery of the Fireworks and their display by BAY FIREWORKS, if applicable, shall be contingent upon the strict compliance by SPONSOR with all items specified on the Exhibition Planner Checklist (EPC) which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, and that the failure of SPONSOR to so comply with all requirements set forth in the EPC to the satisfaction of BAY FIREWORKS within the time limits therein set forth shall be deemed to be a default of SPONSOR's obligations hereunder. 8. SECURITY: SPONSOR shall provide and maintain before, during and after the exhibition until the pyrotechnician in charge declares the area clear, security lines, police protection, snow fencing, rope lines, barricades as deemed necessary by the local government, or as deemed necessary by Bay Fireworks. SPONSOR shall also provide and maintain an area clear of any buildings cars and spectators with a minimum radius as specified by NFPA Code 1123 -1995 as a Fire Safety Please initial each page, and sign the last page. 1 Initial here: Sponsor Bay Fireworks Zone (FSZ) during the entire period commencing from the time the Fireworks are delivered to the site until after the exhibition. It is understood that BAY FIREWORKS will cease all fireworks discharge due to any security breach of the FSZ. BAY FIREWORKS shall not be responsible for personal injury, vehicle or property damage occurring within the FSZ as a result of the failure of SPONSOR to maintain aforementioned FSZ. SPONSOR acknowledges and agrees that BAY FIREWORKS' responsibilities are limited to the sale and exhibition of the Fireworks and that BAY FIREWORKS is relying on SPONSOR to maintain the aforementioned FSZ and to comply with all Federal, State, municipal and local laws, orders, regulations and ordinances pertaining to the implementation of any and all security measures at the site of the exhibition of fireworks. 9. CREDITS: As a material inducement to BAY FIREWORKS agreeing to enter into this Agreement, SPONSOR shall give BAY FIREWORKS program credit as sole fireworks supplier and producer in all press releases, advertising, and any other program announcements, printed or otherwise. 10. INABILITY TO DELIVER OR CONDUCT EXHIBITION: If BAY FIREWORKS shall be unable to deliver all or any part of the fireworks contracted hereunder at the time specified herein or shall be unable to conduct the display of fireworks, (if applicable), due to public emergency or necessity, legal restrictions, labor disputes, strikes, boycotts, acts of God (whether or not such acts of God have occurred frequently or habitually or are of a common or seasonal occurrence in the locality of such display) or for any other reason beyond BAY FIREWORKS' control, BAY FIREWORKS' will be entitled to the full contract price (100 0 /0) 11. TEMPORARY DISCONTINUANCE DURING SERVICE: Any temporary discontinuance during the discharge of said fireworks shall not constitute a breach by BAY FIREWORKS of the terms of this contract. 12 . CONTRACT SUBJECT TO GOVERNMENT REGULATION: This Agreement and BAY FIREWORKS' obligations hereunder are subject to all governing Federal, State, Municipal and local laws, rules, ordinances, regulations and codes, now or hereinafter in effect, and to the conditions and limitations contained in the permits required to be obtained by SPONSOR prior to the delivery and exhibition of the Fireworks. In the event any Federal, State, municipal or local law, rule, regulation or ordinance shall be enacted which in any way prohibits, limits or restricts the sale, performance or operation of the exhibition of the Fireworks described herein or in the event SPONSORSs permit in any way limits or restricts the sale, performance or operation of said exhibition, BAY FIREWORKS shall limit or restrict its performance or exhibition of the Fireworks and/or substitute such equivalent fireworks so as to comply with such law, rule, regulation or ordinance of SPONSOR'S permit. SPONSOR acknowledge that any such limit or restriction placed on the performance or operation of the fireworks exhibition, or any substitution of different fireworks by BAY FIREWORKS shall in no way result in or entitle SPONSOR to a reduction or abatement in the full contract price. 13. GENERAL PROVISIONS: a) BAY FIREWORKS shall not be liable for weather or atmospheric conditions that interfere with or delay the performance or aesthetic quality of the fireworks. b) This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and may not be changed, modified, renewed or extended except by a written agreement, signed by both parties, SPONSOR acknowledge and agrees that BAY FIREWORKS has not made any representations or warranties except other than those specifically set forth in this contract. c) SPONSOR will be responsible for the payment of all governmental fees and taxes, including, but not limited to, sales, use, excise, license, permit, entertainment, or other fees, taxes or surcharges imposed or otherwise applied to this exhibition. d) Should any clause, section, or part of this agreement be held or declared to be void or illegal for any reason, all other clauses, sections, or parts of this agreement which can be effected without such illegal clause, section, or part shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect. e) SPONSOR is responsible for removal of all debris associated with the fireworks. f) Once the contract is signed and the program is then cancelled by the sponsor for any reason, the full contract price of the program (100 %) shall be due and payable immediately, however, a credit allowance of the full contract price minus any expenses incurred by BAY FIREWORKS will be made for up to six months to allow rescheduling of event by sponsor. g) Bay Fireworks agrees to procure liability insurance on behalf of sponsor, and to indemnify sponsor, to the extent thereof, for all claims arising out of Bay Fireworks negligence in excess of $2,500. 14. SPONSOR'S DEFAULT: In the event SPONSOR shall fail to pay any sum when due under the terms of this contract, SPONSOR shall pay, in addition to such amount, interest at the rate of 1 -1/2% per month on the unpaid amount from the original due date. SPONSOR does further agree that it shall pay BAY FIREWORKS' reasonable attorney fees and court costs in the event BAY FIREWORKS shall commence suit or incur fees to compel SPONSOR to pay any sums due hereunder or otherwise as a result of SPONSOR'S default of any of the terms and provisions herein contained. 15. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that in the event of SPONSOR'S default hereunder, BAY FIREWORKS' damages shall be impossible to fix. Accordingly, as a material inducement to BAY FIREWORKS agreeing to enter into this Agreement, SPONSOR agrees that in the event of its default, at the option of BAY FIREWORKS, the entire contract price shall be and become immediately due and payable. 16. SUBSTITUTIONS: BAY FIREWORKS shall have the right, at its discretion, to substitute any fireworks it deems necessary provided same does not detract from the aesthetic value or quality of the program. Any substitutions shall in no way result in or entitle SPONSOR to a reduction or abatement in the full contract price. 17. ARBITRATION: Any and all disputes, differences, or any other type of controversy arising out of or in relation to this Agreement, including as to the meaning or interpretation of any provision hereof, shall be resolved by arbitration in the State of New York, City of New York, pursuant to the commercial rules then obtaining of the American Arbitration Association. Only one (1) arbitrator shall be required. The award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding and judgment may be entered thereon in any court of competent jurisdiction. The arbitrator sitting in such controversy shall have no power to alter or modify any express provision of this Agreement, nor to make any award which by its terms effects any such alteration or modification. The award and decision of the arbitrator must provide for an award to the prevailing party of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, for services rendered (at the attorneys' then prevailing hourly rates) from the outset of the dispute through the ensuing arbitration and anticipated enforcement efforts. The award may include an assessment for such costs and expenses in the event the arbitrator determines that either the claim was not brought in good faith, or a defense was raised in bad faith. A hearing on the issue of fees shall not be required; but shall be determined by affidavits submitted during or after the arbitration hearing pursuant to a procedure to be implemented by the arbitrator. Either party may seek from the court of competent jurisdiction any provisional remedy in aid of arbitration, including, but not limited to, injunction, attachment or replevin, pending the determination of any claim or controversy in arbitration. Please initial each page, and sign the last page. z Initial here: Sponsor Bay Fireworks I 1 BINDING EFFECT: This contract shall not be binding on BAY FIREWORKS until executed by SPONSOR and BAY FIREWORKS and BAY FIREWORKS is in receipt of the deposit required hereunder. EXHIBITION PLANNER CHECKLIST- (EPC) a. FIREWORKS DISPLAY PERMIT SPONSORS RESPONSIBILITY: Call your State, City, County, Town, Borough, or Village Fire Marshal or other appropriate authority to file for and obtain the Fireworks Display permit. Obtain information on: 1) Filing application deadline and fees. 2) If any local land state fireworks license for transportation or display is required. If one is required, fax all forms immediately to us. 3) Fire Marshal's requirements for security of fireworks truck upon arrival, and the security of the fire zone before and during the display. 4) Federal regulations require that we carry an accurate route plan to the display site. Fax us a copy of the route instructions from the nearest US Interstate to the display area (approved by the fire marshal or other authority, if necessary). 5) Notify FAA on day of your display, according to the instructions in the FAA Letter of Approval, which will be forwarded to you prior to your display. b. COASTGUARD PERMITS (where required 1) If the fireworks are to be displayed on or near the water, the following may be required: (Permits must be filed for at least 45 days prior and 120 days prior for 4th of J uly events) 2) Coast Guard Application and Permit to Handle Hazardous Materials. 3) Coast Guard Marine Event Permit c. SPONSOR SITE RESPONSIBILITIES AND EXPENSES r� 1) a. Sand: please deliver r ,.:'!V yards of dry sand to the display site on display date 2) Security - Of equipment and Fire Safety Zone. From fireworks truck arrival until completion of job, and for the fireworks staging area from Bay Fireworks truck arrival until the display is completed and truck is packed for departure. d. RADIO SIMULCAST EXPENSES (Required Yes x No) 1) Set up and staff a fireworks simulcast command center on site by 1:00pm on display date. 2) Provide broadcast relay to Bay Fireworks Firing Center. Call our office for details. 3) Speaker system for VIP viewing stands. e. INSURANCE: Please list below the additional insured, as they should appear on the insurance certificate: 1. 3. 2. 4. SPONSOR'S SIGNATURE BAY FIREWORKS Signature Date Date Print Name Title Please initial each page, and sign the last page. 3 Initial here: Sponsor Bay Fireworks jr SENT-BY: EDGERTON SCHOOL; 2- 4- 0 3 : 35PM; 6517721510 _ 7704500; IM, 1 47 r 1 • ,, • a ; 1, y encr tfo Quantity • i . �:` >,� rrvrrr►u'•+1'rl —�_. rw�ww. �Iw�wwrMr __�_..__...._......... i1,Fl�wmu■ M• ` M,4. ,,M , r� ►j` zti t PFNI NG FINALE Illuminations 4 , I 1 ' i/, ( wrw.. r._ r» w.. wr x........ , .. , ,',Yn•.N,N1rr_.w,o•.•ww• «_- _ ••.r•r.rr«+. •rMM"r / /INIAA.MrM rwr ,_,_•r„r..... h ' Three -Inch Shells 75 75 Four -inch Shells 20 20 s ir 's'; x.. x. ,..x,...,. ».........x._r....,»r rww w. ».. , w,•,.,,, Yr r.,ra.v.�,A._.._......___• —_ —_ .«........_..__.....««....x..., y,lnwn►M►wA,. »._... - -. —...«_ ._.._ r«»......»_.«.-., v,, w�«. �......... »«..w......rw.r.«_......,.....« ................... .._ .. ........... rr...._..r........««.» »._..� _ ..«...._..w........_..r �. ' r,,'. v.,, www.... ...._•_— �— __•— __..._— ..._ —... ». _ _I•w•,'rn„•eI�„w,.�... »....r..� �.� Five -Inch Sh 5 25 •'•x"^^F••'1•,• /•rh,1, V1 A.I. /.A.4__.•_ —w Six- Shells 3 12 h y� ,.'_,._,,.. w.. x.... r..,,_.....».,,. r.....«.. w....,... rw«....__ .__..__._«...»_..w..«»_... r y•./ VrM,• hwx, 4» r... rw,. «.+...w•. »wr.w_.wr.r.r. «.-_ „ 1,• r.,,.»..,. .,A,w.w.l »....«r..r.«._«.._..r. r.,._._._.rr.... 7 . �• 1 . ..... w...._..........,._x......• .... ..... ............,.........,....•,.. ,. ,N. vr,•.L.V.Ar»bu » I.. r. r. r w..._. w. vww ._r_ «_•_r•w•..««w..rw._wwrr_..w •w••nw.. wl• �MI11\ VAYLNI NM. �MYM. M•• r.•_ w. w. w•.• w _r___•_••+.r.r_w.•r.r•_..••w_ww 6 j3 DY —ps w:: 1 Three -I Shells 260 545 .� ,`,�: 1 .� •» r.....•. w..».._ x.. r..,.. �.. r..., .w.._....w._w... /1Y'r, M111MfV1'I,M7WMM ►NMMNM.i_ .•_•«.•.w••rw•+..__. �•_•_.,_w._..• . ww.. ww• wwrNr •"•'rY1MIrN.WY1YY.WWM.'Mww•._ ,. Fo u r -in ch Shells 120 ..w»_.� rw_r.xr« -__ 2 20 ._..��- ...r�.. -.._ m Five -Inch Shells 108 216 '•^ '(. ........,.........,.x........, • .......... w.. x... r.. \r IrI1Ii AIr MY ,r�rr /M 4, \ \II•�WI /M YJ.\ 4. N. 1.►. AL A. �M1MM.-._,- w_. u—_ _.._••ww +__.rw._•._«.»ww_w •. r.•. w•.,.. w•_ r..•_ w,.«. rw. w. uw- wr. nw .•.._r .................. .. r, .. Six -I nch Sh 91 1 82 :'� 5'.� x..,., x,.. ..x.,, «�..«.. »._._......».. »... »..........xr _ »«..........— ............. w... «...».«.....x_.. ».x.... «,. m........_ .. »..._......,_.............,,- --,'.•I•.•,,.•,.•,, Y, II,,. w„',.,,.,._.... ......�.. »._._._.....__r».. —.._ V y� ti Eiaht -Inch Shells 35 105 \�i C' . w.. r.. ....wx..r. « «..w»..... »........» ._...._ _ .. .....r._r«....r•••y�v w', v, vvvnr ,rl/wMew•+uww..►l.wd.l.l�/ — _ _..�. —._ — .«_...._r,.... T en -In Shells 0 Srt •S)'.� .,_r.r....,._..._......x x,. x.....,. w..r.w. .. r..rw..,.. +._... �.� »__«.._ .— _•_— _�__•__ «___-....._ «.« w._.._..—..._ r..« w»«... w. r.... ««w...•..._....,.•._.......y... a Tw elve -inch Shells 0 0 .. ........ �1�ar '�; '',� ._...._. w..»....._....... r.......... w._....«_._».»..,». rwwx..«...... x..«.._.w__. »_.... «...w...w.,.. ...... w..... r......»,.........._ w...._. ..._..,_..— _.__.._....._. »_.x.. .. r«... w.....,.. w...,.r.., »r...»............... .... ................ , '� ».....»r..«....._...r_.rx _ r...wr.....,«x.w._ «.... ... r > � w... x., wrx.,I. .,•x,.._x..»..�.._...x•_x,.x�.. w.._ w.._..... _..w«...w»..w.r..w.._..+...w.ww rr 1 Three -Inch S 780 7 80 !� I \,/ ....._..,..,_............. r.... x..,...,.... xrr..._. r. r... .......,.....r_ «w......r..r...» «.. ». ....... w»...._. 1..«.... x.... w ....... ».«_..........w......rr. ..r_....._.._........ «..._.. Fou — Inch Shel 50 50 s' 1• ire -Inch shells 25 S i x- i nch Sh ells 12 36 Eig ,1 t -I nch Sh 10 15 ` S, +• ._............rr.,....r,.. ... ..w.x...»rx .«, wr. wbwNAA...VN'111./r,1rW'IMP IY.,�It, i.,,.•'r.•I,H I.•'•• ••I.I r• /•' . .w•• i1) • j Ten -inch Shells 0 2 T we l ve -inch Shells 0 2 CTS �'• � ��.:Z ....,w........,,wr«. r. __w,r.w. wwwA,VMVJ.'r'h..,.. w'A' „•' °r"'11.4_•1"N,'YM,'_.. _._w.w__w«rr x.. rw,« w.... wnw«. w»••« w. ww+ _w.,w- -_r...r••_w•___w_—_•__ —rw {.�y �.... r.,........» r... wrn. w....,, r..•. w. rr. w...... ww.w._w__.__•r_— wr.•w•rr«._•_w- .•-.._• w. ww.• ww. n.» ww« wwww__.« W. 6M YIN.V. /d \WM /h /N \ \ ”' M' Y^••""••'• wru.r.r,w.r•.uw— ._w_r,.••.w.__w w —rww._ )C y ,�+ •v _ .. «.. »__._•'•__— '____— ..�.w.4�+u. M.► uu�nrlvn, vnr+ r' n• V/,•/ r.,'/., 1 y•• Ir....._ ..r»..........w.._..._wr -SRECIA, L.EFFE _ 280 t+ o n l�es� 60 m m 35 .-- .. - - -- '� )��� ....... ._ ..... _r41 _MMr,«,.W'.,Vr.V�I• /i rII.• rvrv,.._. r,. Y... .. .........«._.__•r»._.__.w.._. 'lu -Shad ��rles 4000 ,,40 wi t „��i «.«.« rx._,. .........«...»._,..........�..» 4.._ r.,.. II.,, v. 1„' rnr„ rr�avrr•r•,..w «......._... »._.. Speci Star Mines.._.._.x_._ . -- 30 120 #3l4 City of Maplewood Fireworks Production for 1999 BY Northern Pyrotechnics Actual numbers: Shell size Quantity 3" shells: 250 4 shells: 100 5" shells: 60 6" shells: 30 8" shells: 13 10" shells: 10 12" shells: 12 Total Shells: 475 City of Maplewood Proposed Fireworks Production for 2000 B bay Fireworks Proposed numbers: Shell size Quantity Opening Finale 3" shells: 75 4" shells: 20 5" shells: 5 6" shells: 3 Body of Program 3" shells: 260 4" shells: 120 5 shells: 108 6" shells: 91 8" shells: 35 Grand Finale 3" shells: 780 4" shells: 50 5" shells: 25 6 shells: 12 8" shells: 10 Total Shells: 1594 END 14 AGEND ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Co . Date TO: City Manager Endorsed Modified Dejected FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Municipal State Aid Advance Encumbrance Resolution DATE: February 7, 2000 Maplewood's municipal state aid construction program has been much more aggressive in the last few years. We are now eligible to apply for more funds than is available in our account. Each year a certain amount of money at the state Level is available to cities in our situation for advance encumbrances. An advance encumbrance is essentially a loan to the city to be repaid by our next year's allotment. This is a good program for cities like ours that have .aggressive construction programs. It allows utilization of funds that other cities are not using. The attached resolutions requests an advance encumbrance of up to $695,000 for this year. That is equal to our anticipated allotment for the year 2001. If the state still has funds available, Maplewood can spend next year's allotment this year. There is no interest or penalty with this program. It' is recommended the city council adopt the attached resolution requesting an advance encumbrance of $695,000 on our municipal state aid account. KG H it Attachment RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is planning on implementing Municipal State Aid Street Project(s) in 2000, which will require state aid funds in excess of those available in its State Aid Construction Account, and WHEREAS, said city is prepared to proceed with the construction of said project(s) through the use of advance encumbrances from the General State Aid Construction Account to supplement the available funds in their State Aid Construction Account, and WHEREAS, repayment of the funds so advanced will be made in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 162.14 Subdivision 6 and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8820. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Commissioner of Transportation be and is hereby requested to approve this advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid Street Project(s) of the City of Maplewood in an amount of up to $695,000 in accordance with the Minnesota Rules 8820.1500, Subparagraph 9, and to authorize repayments from the following years accruals to the construction account of the Municipal State Aid Street fund for said city. A No. G 15 AGENDA REPORT DATE: J anuar y 31, 2000 TO* Cit Mana FROM: Human. e Director SUBJECT: Assistant Finance Director & MIS/GIS Technician Compensation The positions of Assistant Finance Director and MIS/GIS Technician were recentl re-evaluated. Both of these positions are in the non-represented g roup. I conducted a market anal to determine—th- e---a-ppr-Gpn-"-at-e---pa far --posi-ti-on s-.------Af-t--er-- comparin the responsibilities with other comparable positions in the Stanton Group V cities, I found that both positions were underpaid, particularl at the maximum of the ran Action b Council Date Endorsed Modified Re We want to ensure that our salaries are competitive so we can retain g ood emplo and attract g ood candidates if the positions become vacant. I recommend the 2000 salar ran be revised as follows: Job Title Current Salar Ran Proposed Sal y Ran Asst. Finance Director MIS/GIS Tech. $447556 - $59,486 $311,209 - $36,411 RECOMMENDATION $507244 - $66,312 $357690 - $467350 Please forward m re for these salar ran ad to the Cit Council for their approval. If there is an other information I can provide, please let me know. Agenda Item # G 160 MEMORANDUM Action by Council TO: City Mana4inty Date FROM: City Clerk Endorsed RE: Temporary Resolution Modred .ejected DATE: February 5, 2000 Presentation of Blessed Virgin Mary Church, 1725 Kennard Street, is requesting a temporary (two day) gambling permit for May 6th and 7th, from 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. This is the church's annual spring festival. In order for the State of Minnesota to issue a temporary license, approval of the following resolution from the City is required. RESOLUTION BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the temporary premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the Presentation of Blessed Virgin Mary Church, 1725 Kennard Street, Maplewood, Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. .FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. AGENDA rnsm No Action by Council MEMORANDUM Date TO: City Manager Endorsed FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Modified SUBJECT: Tax - Exempt Revenue Financing - Lutheran Social Services Re DATE: January 10, 2000 INTRODUCTION Lutheran Social Services (LSS) is requesting that the city council give host approval for up to $1.8 million in tax- exempt revenue note financing. They would use this financing to buy property, 'vans and computer equipment throughout the state. LSS is the largest provider of residential services for the developmentally disabled and elderly in Minnesota. They provide programs and facilities for persons with developmental disabilities from the property at 122 Skillman Avenue in 'Maplewood and from other area locations. (See the memo from Dani Deering starting on page two.) LSS is requesting that the city approve this financing so the bond interest would be tax - exempt. The state and federal governments require local government approval of tax- exempt financing. DISCUSSION Maplewood will not be liable for this financing. Brainerd will issue the revenue bonds. As such, the state requires local city approval of the financing request. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached resolution starting on page four. This approves Maplewood giving host approval for up to $1.8 million in tax - exempt revenue financing for Lutheran Social Services. p /misc /Iss.fin Attachments: 1. 12 -16 -99 memo from Dani Deering 2. Host Approval Financing Resolution Attachment 1 Kc%nnc: ' d 47o ro1chury c nta 200 5nuth Si-<t11 Sf tCet Mirnurnf MN 55402 (61 Z) 3. 1 7 -1300 rdephonc (G 12) 337 - 1 n fax http://www.kcn gu ve tt . E DANIEVLA P. DEMUNG Attorney at taw Ditcct that (0 t 2) 337.9211 ctnaii Mccr:ns kenncdy -�ticn corn MEMORANDUM TO: City Administrators and City Attorneys .OM: Mani P. Deering, Esq., Kennedy & GTavcn, Chtd. P'E: Lutheran Social ServiGes Tax -Ex=pt Financing project DATE: December 16, 1999 Our client, Lutheran Social Serviccs of Minnesota (""LSS"'). is the state's largest provider of residcntial services for the developmentally disabled and elderly. LSS operates facilities and provides services In 86 of this Statc's 87 counties In order to enhance ses�vices in its locations throughout the State, LSS plans to obtain tax& excmpt financing itt the form of bands issucd by the City of Brainerd, Minnesota to putchase real property, mini and full -size vans and computer equipment. LSS, in seeking tax- exempt financing for thcse purchases, will realize substantial savings in its cost for capital. These .savings will allow LSS to improve its facilities, replace vehicles sooner and attract and maintain quality staff mcrnbers. Some of the items of rcal and/or personal property purchased through this bond issue will be distributed to the LSS facility in your city. pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 469.155, subd. 9 l 998 upon the approval oPthe respective city councils, LSS may obtain tax - exempt financing from the City of Brainerd to finance capital purchases that will benefit LSS facilities looted in Brainerd and other cities throughout the state. To that end, attached pleasc find copies of a draft (1) public atio» and hearing notice and (2) resolution for your review. Pleasc review the d ocuments as soon as possible. If the documents meet with your approval, please contact my secretary Diane 13arrett at 612- 337 -9278 indicating your name: the city you arc from; and whether approval of publication is granted. T will be happy to answer atiy additional questions or comnicnts that arise. It is our hope, bowcver, to resolve any issues prior to the public; hearing in lieu of having omeone physically resent at the g l? y Y p council meetings. DPt)- 17345A NP. 185-57 2 98-1 90/20 ' d X89 -1 0188196+ N300 I AHNNN -M i 9:9 1 00 -90 -10 Upon your apptoval of the publication notice, our first will arrange publication of the notice to comply with . the 15 -day statutory requiremcnt. Feel free to adapt the resolution to a format required by your ' city. After approval by your respective councils, we will contact Y ou to obtain copies of the signed tesolution. We look '"forward -to working with all of you. On behalf our client, we ,would like to thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Dani .eering DP b Enclos DFD•17345A NP1 85.57 3 98-4 90/0 ' d x'95 -i 0 glee+ N3AYN0 I A03NNN -Woad ON I 00 -90 -10 Attachment 2 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE. OF REVENUE NOTES BY THE CITY OF BRAINERD UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 4699152 THROUGH 469.165, AS AMENDED, TO FINANCE PROPERTY FOR THE BENEFIT OF LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA WHEREAS, under. the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 - 469.165, as amended (the "Act "), each municipality and redevelopment agency of the State of Minnesota (as defined in the Act), including the City of P g y Brainerd, Minnesota (the "City of Brainerd "), is authorized to issue revenue obligations to finance capital equipment and improvements to land and buildings for the benefit of a revenue P P producing enterprise to be owned by a contracting party (as defined in the Act); and. WHEREAS, under Section 469.155, subdivision 9, of the Act, the City of Brainerd is authorized to enter into and perform contracts and agreements with other municipalities as the governing y overnin bodies of the city and as the other municipalities may deem proper and feasible for or concerning the financing of a project under the Act, including an agreement whereby one municipality issues its revenue obligations in behalf of one or more other municipalities; and P y g WHEREAS, the City of Brainerd, has proposed to issue one or more revenue notes (the "Notes" )and loan the P roceeds derived from the sale of the Notes to Lutheran Social Service of Minnesota, a nonprofit organization (the "Borrower "), to finance the acquisition of computer equipment and motor vehicles, and the acquisition and construction of improvements to existing buildings (the "Project "), to be located at the existing facilities of the Borrower in numerous municipalities in the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the Project was held on the date hereof, after notice was published and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, at which public hearin g all those. appearing who desired to speak were heard and written comments were accepted; and WHEREAS, a portion of the Project will be located in the City of Brainerd and at the existing facilities of the Borrower in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City "); B -1 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 1. The portion of the Project to be located in the City (as described in the Notice of Public Hearing published prior to the date of consideration of this resolution) is hereby approved by the City and the issuance of the Notes by the City for such purpose (in the amount described in the Notice of Public Hearing ) and in an aggregate principal not to exceed $1,800,000 is hereby approved. 2. Obligations will be issued by the City of Brainerd to finance the Project and the Notes to be issued. b y y the Cit of Brainerd to finance the Project shall not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon . any property of any other city; and the Notes, when, as, and if issued, shall recite in substance that the Notes, including the interest thereon, are P ayable :ti.solely from the revenues received from the Project and the property pledged to the payment thereof; and the Notes shall not constitute an obligation of any other city and shall not be secured by any taxing power of any other city. 3. The Borrower shall pay any and all costs incurred by the cities where the LSS facilities are located in connection with the portion of the Project located in those cities, whether or not the Project is approved, the Notes are issued, or the Project is carried to completion. 4. All prior actions taken by the City staff with respect to directing Kennedy & Graven, Chartered to P repare the Notice of Public Hearing causing notice of the hearing to be given one publication in the official newspaper of City and a newspaper of general circulation available in the City, not less than 14 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the hearing are hereby ratified, affirmed and approved. Approved by the Maplewood City Council on February 14, 20008 B -2 5 AGJIMAITEMNO� MEMORANDUM Action by Council Date TO: f - City Manager Endorsed Y g . FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner M offed SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat, Front Setback Variance and Design Review&iec Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No,, 7 LOCATION: West of 2175 Woodlynn Avenue DATE: January 24, 2000 INTRODUCTION Project Description Patrick Kinney, of PJK Realty, is proposing a preliminary plat for the balance of the Woodlynn Heights Townhomes development. Refer to the maps and drawings on pages 10-14. Mr. Kinney is proposing nine additional lots for three, three -unit buildings. These nine units would complete the Woodlynn Heights Townhomes development which started in 1984. Each of the proposed three- plexes would have the same design and exterior materials. The proposed buildings would have exteriors of horizontal -lap vinyl siding. The front elevations would also have brick which would wrap around onto the side elevations. Refer to the building elevations. Requests Mr. Kinney is requesting: 1. Approval of a preliminary plat. 2. Approval of a front setback variance for the. paved driveway /parking area. The code requires a 15 -foot setback; the applicant is proposing eight feet. Refer to the letter on page 15. 3. Approval of site, landscaping and building design plans. BACKGROUND On November 25, 1991, the city council approved the preliminary plat for Woodlynn Heights Townhomes Buildings 5--8. Buildings 1-4 were already built. To date, the first six four -unit Townhomes have been built. In 1991, townhome numbers 7 and 8 were approved to be a four - unit and a five -unit building to complete the remaining nine units that could be built. Since 1991, the city council renewed this preliminary plat several times. The preliminary plat for these two remaining buildings ended, however, on July 1, 1998, since the previous developer did not complete the project. DISCUSSION Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat for the nine remaining units complies with density requirements. Even though these last units would be three- plexes, they would be compatible with the previous buildings in layout and design. Driveway Setback Variance The front driveway setbacks for the six buildings to the east vary. The first four buildings meet or exceed the 15 -foot minimum setback. The last two buildings built do not meet the pavement setback because of contractor error. The applicant could meet the 15 -foot setback requirement if the buildings were moved north to the r NSP easement line. The front of the proposed buildings would not line up with the adjacent structure, however, and the deck stairs would encroach into the NSP easement. Staff feels it is better to allow the lessened driveway setback for visual consistency. The development would not benefit in appearance by requiring greater setbacks than the adjacent site. As a condition of approval, the city should require the applicant to revise the landscape plan for the front yard area to match the planting types and quantities of the buildings to the east. Building Design The proposed buildings would be attractive and would fit in with the design of the existing townhomes. Landscaping As stated above, the applicant should revise the landscape plan to be consistent and compatible with the buildings to the east. The applicant should present a revised landscape plan providing for seven spruce trees, two clumps of birch trees and an assortment of low - growing shrubs in the front yards on each side of the entrance driveways for each three -plex. The spruce trees must be at least six feet tall and the birch at least 2 %Z inches in caliper, balled and budapped. This planting layout is consistent with the existing buildings to the east. The plantings proposed around the front of the units should remain on the plan. In addition to the above, all yard areas should be sodded (except for mulched and edged planting beds) and an in- ground lawn irrigation system installed for all landscape areas (code requirement). COMMITTEE ACTIONS January 18, 2000: The community design review board (CDRB) recommended that the council deny the front setback variance and approve the architectural, landscaping and site plans. January 19, 2000: The planning commission recommended that the city council deny the front setback variance and approve the preliminary plat. 2 RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on pages 16 -17 approving a seven -foot front setback variance for Woodlynn Heights Townhomes Number 7. Approval of the setback variance is because it would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance --it would result in consistent building and pavement setbacks with the adjacent townhouse site to the east. This variance is subject to the applicant revising the landscape plan for staff approval which incorporates the following details: 1. Seven spruce trees, two clumps of birch trees and six low- growing shrubs in the front yards on each side of the entrance driveways for each three -plex. 2. The spruce trees must be at least six feet tall and the birch at least 2 % inches in caliper, balled and burlapped. 3. The plantings proposed around the front of the units shown on the landscape plan date - stamped December 3, 1999 shall remain on the plan. 4. In addition to the above, all front side and rear yard areas shall be sodded (except for mulched and edged planting beds and the area within the NSP easement) and an in- ground lawn irrigation system shall be installed for all landscape areas (code requirement). The NSP easement area may be seeded. 5. No landscaping shall take place in the boulevard and the boulevard shall be restored with sod. B. Approve the preliminary plat date - stamped December 3, 1999 for the proposed Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 7. Approval is subject to the applicant complying with the following conditions: 1.* Obtaining the city engineer's approval of the final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include grading, utility, drainage and erosion control plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall: (1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (2) Include contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. (3) Show all proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 on the proposed construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. 2. Paying for costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction plans. 3 3. Signing a developer's agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Provide five -foot -wide drainage and utility easements along each side lot line between buildings and along the west and east lot lines of this addition. d. Extend the five- foot -wide concrete sidewalk from its current location to the west lot line of this townhouse addition. e. Provide for the repair of Woodlynn Avenue (street and boulevard) after the developer connects to the public utilities and builds the sidewalk. 4. If the developer decides to final plat the preliminary plat, the director of community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. 5.* Submitting the homeowner's association bylaws and rules to the Director of Community Development. These are to assure that there will be one responsible party for the maintenance of the private utilities, driveways and structure. 6.* Providing a written statement from NSP and Amoco Oil Company which allows the grading in the easement that the developer proposes. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. C. Approve the plans date- stamped December 3, 1999 for Woodlynn Heights No. 7 Townhomes, based on the findings required by the code. The developer, Patrick Kinney, shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit the applicant shall: a. Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval. b. Submit a revised landscape plan to staff for approval which incorporates the following details: (1) Seven spruce trees, two clumps of birch trees and six low - growing shrubs in the front yards on each side of the entrance driveways for each three -plex. (2) The spruce trees must be at least six feet tall and the birch at least 2 %z inches in caliper, balled and burlapped. (3) The plantings proposed around the front of the units shown on the landscape plan date - stamped December 3, 1999, shall remain on the plan. (4) In addition to the above, all front side and rear yard areas shall be sodded (except for mulched and edged planting beds and the area within the NSP easement) and an in- ground lawn irrigation system shall be installed for all landscape areas (code requirement). (5) No landscaping shall take place in the boulevard and the boulevard shall be restored with sod. c. Stake the NSP easement line and the front and side lot lines with survey irons. d. Revise the site plan to increase the driveway turnaround setback from the east lot line to five feet (code requirement). e. Present a color scheme to staff for approval for each building. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction. b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. Sod all landscaped areas except for the area within the NSP easement which may be seeded. c. Install an automatic in- ground irrigation system. d. Extension of the five- foot -wide concrete sidewalk to the west lot line of this development. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. CITIZEN COMMENTS I surveyed the 24 surrounding property owners within 350 feet of this property for their comment about this proposal. I received the following 10 replies: 1. I would have preferred that the city would have added this property to the open space property behind it. But in reality, if the new townhomes are decent, fit in with ours, don't block views of our members, have proper drainage and aren't low income housing, my objection wouldn't be big. I hope they don't bring another FARM museum with them though. (Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 5 Homeowners Association, 2185 Woodlynn Avenue) 2. Thank you for the information regarding the proposed three -unit townhouse buildings to be built across Woodlynn Avenue from the Village on Woodlynn. After reviewing the plans, I see no reason why this request should be refused. It seems that the plans fit the neighborhood as it has been developing over the past years. I would encourage the planning commission and city council to approve this request. (Howard L. Rekstad, Cottages of Maplewood) 3. 1 have no objections or comment on the matter. (Smeed, 2191 Woodlynn Avenue) 4. 1 have no objections to additional townhomes on Woodlynn Avenue. Is there a possibility of NSP burying the electrical lines behind our homes? They are an eye -sore and very close to some homes. (Nelson, 2187 Woodlynn Avenue) 5. We support the proposed townhouse plan and site development as submitted by PJK Realty to be built on the Woodlynn Heights site. The design is complementary to the present existing structures. The only question we submit is developing a drainage system that run -off will flow in the west and southern drainage water between #5 and #6. This problem needs more improvement. (Arko, 2181 Woodlynn Avenue) 6. When I purchased my unit at 2177 Woodlynn Avenue, I was informed that additional units might be built. My concerns are for adequate drainage and attractive units. Obviously, if I could stop the project altogether I would do so, but I don't believe that is possible. The proposed units look similar to current existing units. I think that is good. (Donnay, 2177 Woodlynn Avenue) 7. 1 have no objections to them and think they could be an improvement to the neighborhood. However, I feel there should be a sidewalk all the way to Ariel Street and cleared of snow in the winter. There are many people walking in the street. Very dangerous! Thank you. (Sommerhauser, 2184 Woodlynn Avenue) 8. What price range will they be? How will they blend in with the present townhouses? Will they have the same landscaping in front? (Olson, 2179 Woodlynn Avenue) 9. I would prefer no further development on Woodlynn Avenue, Ariel Street or County Road D. We now have a farm which will bring tours and traffic. We have beautiful wildlife in the area behind our homes (supposed to be open space). We see deer and red foxes. Woodchucks and pheasants. My fear is additional traffic will drive away these beautiful creatures. Please keep this open space open to the animals. Thanks. (Herpolsheimer, 2197 Woodlynn Avenue) on 10. Thanks for inquiring! The city apparently missed a fine opportunity to purchase these lots to add visual access and more variety to the open space for a small amount of money. If that is true we should be aware of how the development would fit into the OS /heritage farm setting. Someone needs to walk the property and check for plant or plant areas (tine of shrubs on the north) that have been valuable to the OS critters. We believe that at the most two three -unit townhouses should be built, allowing more open buffers between and on both sides of buildings. Or three double -wide townhomes eliminating the less desirable middle units. Please work on the possibility of doing wildlife plantings and limiting sodding on the north side of land. We were told that drainage is a problem. Soils are filled from previous construction. Please talk to watershed district. There was an historic pond on the OS. It would be great to get water back. (Mammenga and Brooker, 2172 Woodlynn Avenue) 7 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 2 acres Existing land use: Undeveloped SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Undeveloped City of Maplewood open space land South:. Woodlynn Avenue and single dwellings West: Undeveloped City of Maplewood open space land East: Woodlynn Heights Townhomes (six four -unit buildings) PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: R3(M) (multiple dwelling residential— medium density) Zoning: R3 (multiple dwelling residential) Ordinance Requirements Section 38- 28(c)(5)(a) requires that parking lots be set back 15 -feet from a street right -of -way. Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the community design review board (CDRB) make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments, and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Criteria for Variance Approval State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance from the zoning code: 0 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship," as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Application Date We received the preliminary plat and CDRB applications on December 3, 1999, and the variance application on December 27, 1999. State law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a proposal. City council action is required on this proposal by February 27, 2000. p:sec2n /woodhts. #7 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Front and Rear Building Elevations 5. Side Building Elevations 6. Letter of Variance Request Dated December 27, 1999 7. Variance Resolution 8. Plans date - stamped December 3, 1999 (separate attachments) .Oj Attachment 1 I WHITE BEAR LAKE nr ....q I Mh AmAw V& ^a 00% a RIP N v ° � 3 W J IR Q s: t,�aN av � "J 1 f • •� u RD 2221A� 6Af&5snei .rvr NORTH SAINT PAUL Q 12C LOCATION MAP 10 4 N Attachment 2 ----- 1/4 COUNTY ROAD D •� • re as.ltS't • fool ito• ► .34 +to• •o' ec' too• 3 • ac. N1 jvM . .41x4. .19AC. , • , +ac• ' i %0 h 9D 13.30 31 14 C t 20 v • t ;o A so s 4o 030 �•� �o io .SSA, 0 +o .sue - `0 10 •� 1� .0 • `` 1 tN ' ♦ O 133 - - v Ulm in + t i • c3o WATER + 240 in � ��� 1• do .............. -� C 4 5 6 7 N I N S 3• WOODLYNN HEIGHT .. 16 r 4' $� 34 o Tw - - � H ES 003 Y. NO. 7 . N ,: _ 2604. (3.3) - - N .2 O N .4 0 .1 O NO N0.3 h N 0.6•�t o N0.5 �-- £ t• y A-' .'C PY FO R DE TA 1 L S ■ ■ ■ TLOT A ••� gq qt Ito• Ito IID' Ito' too, Z ►Go It • .��� 3048) � ,bb � ,48 ❑ o c 2144 ► 2154. 2164 2172 - 6 2206 - o �-~ 2 Oz) 19 .► 3 0 . �� �9> - tt ► 1 v 3045 - 2 � c � �. ts�s • � es at° 4 41 9z s •� S • 1 Al (3 ?) b �.� S S) Q 0 3 5, o ■s■ � o � c 4 ( o 15 3 i7 1 0 21 22 ° J PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 N 11 3 .9734. c 14 `oo 0 31 14 C t 20 • 0 0 • 3 14 fS 1 2 2� 1� 2 1 �o 31 15� tto ,o 10 - - - -- •���i�� - - -- 33 ►L �.� --- - 1 0• - -- -- %l•i? o Doc t7ot�i� - - -- - - - - -- �:cI a's ���e ? - t� IQ O peei702At3 ate Dec'r'�o2ilL b' N • L3• ` LYDIA ? AVENUE • O:o� -' I 'o 00 Dec. �TVa&C t p�c' )lOt, tt! t2 -tj►'f - - • -� _t 0 30 , 3 O t35 10 ?.irl' IoS' •� to�.s' too• tOi.t' p' n p toS' •�' �o>< • too • • t, 1 2 p in ak J PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 N 11 Attachment 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT., Pi?ELIMINARY GRADING EROSION CONTROL- AND UTILITY PLAN WO�t��1'1�11�! � � I C�� t� tO1�1�1� 01"«� 110. '1 FOR: PAT KINNEY 1866 *Sim Avomse Maplewood, MN 68101 phone: x 11417.34 A wl." "Q- ir Zu ni 19 0 04"rMt "" . "I be SITE PLAN 12 was 4 ■ own —x x x IS 329.14 SK AfJ00040Z Inn- w "I it, 9" 76 M79 Us.?3 OIL03 x 162.43 W231 W3JM 96147 91too 1"117 163.41 :,ti�,.:'. �r�' IN Gs p 99 go "I it, 1 1 r :x v � a J l ail =-A W REAR ELEVATION xw<e u•.ro• w x A 8 3 x 4 w L ml aou 1z i n C+ n S oorY Mn 4h 4.0f AN WWC 4 a Aw e►Au I I 4,a Aw arAu � o i 4 <<l1) W h = = r4 ' o i oz r d wP< 's r W p p = ON�V = oc < Y w av . O man a or ►x : K-Ot�M IrNK011R n � �M i DEC -27 -1999 MON O3:22 PM CBBURNET FAX NO, 6517708890 Attach p, en 0 6 OCC City of Maplewood Re: woodlynn' Heights Townhomes. z am askin g that you consider a. 7' front setback variance for the driveways and asphalt surflaces of this proposed townhome plat. The reasoning for this variance will be so that the front's of these units will line up and be continuous with the previously guilt woodlynn townho m c s. This variance would also allow for the rear ofthe Townhomes to be more its line with the prow x ously built units, Sincrcly, Patrick J. Kinney 15 VARIANCE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Patrick Kinney, of PJK Realty, applied for a variance. from the zoning ordinance. WHEREAS, this variance applies to property west of 2175 Woodlynn Avenue. The legal description is: LOT ONE, BLOCK ONE, WOODLYNN HEIGHTS TOWNHOMES NO.6 WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c)(5)(a) requires that parking lots be set back 15 feet from a street right - of -way. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a setback of eight feet. WHEREAS, this requires a variance of seven feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1. On January 3, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this variance. 2. The city council held a public hearing on February 14, 2000. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described variance as recommended by the city staff that would allow no more than a seven -foot encroachment into the required 15 -foot front setback area because it would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance it would result in consistent building and pavement setbacks with the adjacent townhouse site to the east. This variance is subject to the applicant revising the landscape plan for staff approval which incorporates the following details: 1. Seven spruce trees, two clumps of birch trees and six low - growing shrubs in the front yards on each side of the entrance driveways for each three -plex. 2. The spruce trees must be at least six feet tall and the birch at least 2 %2 inches in caliper, balled and burlapped. 3. The plantings proposed around the front of the units shown on the landscape plan date - stamped December 3, 1999 shall remain on the plan. 4. In addition to the above, all front side and rear yard areas shall be sodded (except for mulched and edged planting beds and the area within the NSP easement) and an in- ground lawn irrigation system shall be installed for all landscape areas (code requirement). The NSP easement area may be seeded. 16 5. No landscaping shall take place in the boulevard and the boulevard shall be restored with sod. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on February 14, 2000. 17 MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JANUARY 18, 2000 VI. DESIGN REVIEW A. Woodlynn Heights Townhomes, Woodlynn Avenue PJK Realty Secretary Tom Ekstrand presented the staff report. Patrick Kinney was present to discuss his proposal. Mr. Kinney was agreeable to "beefing up" the landscaping to make it compatible with that of the existing townhouse units in the development. He did not have samples of the materials to be used or the exterior colors but said they would be earth -tone, quality materials "equal or superior" to those used in the previous buildings, i.e. Anderson or Marvin windows, upgraded vinyl siding, etc. Mr. Kinney also said these units would probably be built by a "quality" contractor who has done a lot of building in the northeast metro area. Secretary Ekstrand pointed out that the existing units do not all match. Lap siding, cedar, vinyl, etc. have all been used on the other buildings. Chairperson Ledvina asked how the setback variance request related to possible encroaching into the easement. Mr. Kinney replied that, with the NSP high voltage line in the. back of the property and the size of the units, they thought it would be most logical to line these buildings up with the existing units. Secretary Ekstrand said he researched the prior units and they were required to comply with the 15 -foot setback ordinance. For some reason, they did not and the error was not caught. Mr. Ekstrand thought it was more important "to go with consistency" and, therefore, recommended approval of this variance to keep the units in line. Mr. Kinney said a variegated brown /black, upgraded, asphalt shingle with a 3- dimensional look would be used. Mr. Ekstrand confirmed that there was adequate parking. Chairperson Ledvina wasn't sure that it "made. the most sense" to continue the setback variance, especially on a busy street such as Woodlynn. He suggested "stair- stepping" the units back perhaps putting the first unit back three to four feet and the next one at the proper setback. After observing the difference in setback on the existing units, he thought it was rather "a nice variance." Chairperson Ledvina also thought the front facade of these townhomes could be "dressed up in some way," perhaps with a dormer, to add architectural interest. He referred to the turret - design and bay window on the townhomes to the east. Mr. Kinney said the plan is to build these units in three stages and the color has not been decided upon. Boardmember Shankar indicated that whether the buildings were going to be the same color might affect his view on the setback issue. Mr. Kinney did not see any reason why the buildings would not all be the same color. Mr. Shankar thought, if all the units were the same color, it would help to separate the developments by pushing the new buildings back eight feet to the north. Mr. Shankar thought it was best to move all the buildings in this group back because the lots "are not that huge." Mr. Kinney asked to make a comment. He noted that the units further to the east on McKnight Road are set back more but they tend to be more lineal. They are two -story units with living space over the garage. The new units have the garage more to the front of the street. Mr. Shankar said that since the garage is so prominent in front, pushing the units back would "downplay" the garage. Secretary Ekstrand pointed out that the stairways from the decks on the back extend straight out to the north. If the units were set back, these stairways would go inside the NSP easement. According to Mr. Ekstrand, this should technically not occur. Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes of 01 -18 -00 Mr. Ekstrand spoke about the bay area .bump -outs on the adjace -nt units. He said the problem with the proposed three- plexes is that they have to be twenty feet apart between buildings. This could be an encroachment problem. Mr. Ledvina said he was not specifically suggesting that bump -outs be added. He was using the bay window as an example of a nice architectural detail that could be used. Secretary Ekstrand said it is seven or eight feet to the easement line from the back of the buildings as they are now proposed. Mr. Ledvina suggested that the steps on the back could run from east to west. It was also mentioned that a small landing with the stairs running along the wall of the house might work. Mr. Ekstrand suggested no stairs on the back of the deck or obtaining written permission from NSP to encroach into the easement. Mr. Shankar could easily see the steps being worked into the covered portion of the deck without having to protrude out by "going on the side." According to Mr. Ekstrand, the city engineer indicated there were no drainage issues with this proposal. It is a standard condition to ask the applicant for provide a drainage plan for city approval. Boardmember Shankar said he was having difficulty understanding the number of steps shown in the elevation and in the plan. Mr. Ekstrand thought the grade issues could be fine - tuned with the city engineer and building official's review of the plans. Mr. Shankar was of the opinion that the back steps should be worked into the deck and the units moved back to the easement line. Another boardmember agreed with Mr. Shankar. Mr. Ledvina said the accent trim on the garages was "a step in the right direction" but the garages were really significant. Mr. Shankar felt that staff should have an opportunity to review the color of these units before approval, especially since there are a variety of colors on the existing buildings. Mr. Kinney requested that if the variance was not going to be approved, since part of the recommendation was to approve a variance subject to the applicant revising the landscape plan, the landscape plan be lessened to basically meet the citytcode but not necessarily be as aggressive as that to the east. Mr. Ekstrand said he would still make the same recommendation for additional landscaping because the existing six buildings have essentially the same landscaping scheme. He would not care to see less on these proposed buildings. Boardmember Shankar moved the Community Design Review Board recommend : A. Denial of a resolution that would approve a seven -foot front setback variance for Woodlynn Heights Townhomes Number 7. C. Approval of the plans date - stamped December 3, 1999 for Woodlynn Heights No. 7 Townhomes, based on the findings required by the code. The developer, Patrick Kinney, shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit the applicant shall: a. Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval. b. Submit a revised landscape plan to staff for approval which incorporates the following details: Community Design Review Board -3- Minutes of 01 -18 -00 (1) Seven spruce trees, two clumps of birch trees and six low- growing shrubs in the front yards on each side of the entrance driveways for each three -plex. (2) The spruce trees must be at Feast six feet tall and the birch at least 2 Y2 inches in caliper, balled and burlapped. (3) The plantings proposed around the front of the units shown on the landscape plan date - stamped December 3, 1999 shall remain on the plan. (4) In addition to the above, all front side and rear yard areas shall be sodded (except for mulched and edged planting beds and the area within the NSP easement) and an in- ground lawn irrigation system shall be installed for all landscape areas (code requirement). (5) No landscaping shall take place in the boulevard and the boulevard shall be restored with sod. c. Stake the NSP easement line and the front and side lot lines with survey irons. d. Revise the site plan to increase the driveway turnaround setback from the east lot line to five feet (code requirement). e. Present a color scheme for each building to staff for approval. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction. b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. Sod all landscaped areas except for the area within the NSP easement which may be seeded. c. Install an automatic in- ground irrigation system. d. Extension of the five -foot -wide concrete sidewalk to the west lot line of this development. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Boardmember LaCasse seconded. Community Design Review Board -4- Minutes of 01 -18 -00 Chairperson Ledvina said, as the discussion related to denial of the variance, the potential design issues related to the buildings not aligning were not sufficient to offset the negative aspects of the reduced setback of those buildings. Ayes all The motion passed. MINUTES. OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1.330 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2000 V. NEW BUSINESS A. Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 7 (West of 2175 Woodlynn Avenue): Preliminary Plat and Front Setback Variance Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. The board had no questions on the staff report. Pat Kinney, the applicant, had nothing to add to the report. Commissioner Trippler asked the applicant to explain the easement aspect of the proposal. Mr. Kinney said that the lot extends back but NSP has a power line easement over the majority of the back of the land. The land can be .used by the homeowner but cannot be built upon. Commissioner Ledvina felt that moving the buildings back eight feet to meet the setback requirement would not be an extreme hardship for the applicant. He noted the different setback for the existing townhomes. He did not "see any glaring problem with the differences in the alignment of the building." It also made sense to Mr. Ledvina that, since Woodlynn is a busy street, these units should be set further back, at least within the setback requirement. Commissioner Rossbach asked about potential drainage problems. Mr. Kinney was not aware of any problems. Commissioner Ledvina confirmed that, based on discussion at the Maplewood Community Design Review Board meeting the previous evening, the city engineering department did not think there would be any difficulty in dealing with drainage from the site. Ken Haider, city engineer, said when the other units to the east were built, the drainage was "shunted off' to the west a little further each time and now needs to be brought out to the street. He said the plan does have a swale in between each of the units that comes out to the front. Mr. Haider felt this was adequate. Mr. Kinney said reducing the depth of the buildings and spreading them out was not an option they did not have enough width to expand that way. He pointed out that the buildings closest to McKnight Road are a totally different style. They are two -story townhomes with garages underneath or close to the upper level and front structure of the house. The units directly to the east of the proposed buildings have the garages more to the front and the living area to the back of the home. Commissioner Trippler asked if the units directly to the east had requested a setback variance. Mr. Roberts clarified that the fronts of the buildings were not the setback problem, just the parking areas. He said the problem was that, when the bituminous parking areas were put in front, they put in more than what was allowed by code. He pointed out that the front of the building directly to the east lines up with the proposed fronts of the new units. These units did not receive a variance for the parking lots. Mr. Trippler questioned if allowing "the next three to conform to the two that are out of compliance" sent a "bad message to people in Maplewood to just go ahead and do whatever you want to do" and then keep doing it. He thought it was better to say that those two were done wrong and no more can be done that way. Mr. Roberts said that staff felt it was possible to cut the parking area down but it would make vehicle maneuvering too tight, and pushing the buildings back would put them up against the easement. Commissioner Mueller asked if the design of the proposed buildings was changed to that of the first four units would they then fit on these lots. Staff confirmed that they would. Commissioner Rossbach pointed out that they were basically talking about three feet of asphalt that is too close to the road since the buildings were aligned. Because the buildings could be placed as Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 01 -19 -2000 designed, he didn't think it made sense to handicap the people by not giving them adequate turn - around space. Commissioner Trippler questioned why Mr. Rossbach was talking about three feet; he thought it was. eight feet. Mr. Rossbach said the argument was the same the buildings meet the setback, just the parking areas don't. Mr. Trippler had a problem with "negating our rules and regulations" and then have the city grant a variance for the same thing. He said if the issue was only three feet, the applicant could move the building back three feet. Mr. Roberts said they were talking about seven feet. Commissioner Ledvina also mentioned that the buildings don't bump up right against the NSP easement so there is some room to move the buildings :back and reconfigure _the stairs to meet the setback requirement. Thus, he did not feel there was a hardship by meeting the setback requirement. Commissioner Trippler remarked that the first four existing buildings appear to be at the easement line. He asked if there had been any problems with. these units complying with the easement. Mr. Roberts said a shed was built in the easement with permission from NSP. He was not aware of anything else. Mr. Roberts said that extensive landscaping was recommended in the boulevard area between the sidewalk and parking /driveway area. Commissioner Rossbach asked, if the city council denied the variance, would the applicant move the buildings back or lessen the parking areas? Mr. Kinney replied that it would probably be a combination of both. According to Commissioner Ledvina, the building elevations shown on the grading plans would not provide for a "look -out type" of setup. The grading plan shows that the finished floor elevation is a foot above the grade. Therefore, if the decks are built, there would only be one or two stairs to match the existing grade. Chairperson Fischer noted that the grading plan was marked preliminary. Mr. Kinney thought the units further to the west would have the Kook -out basements. Commissioner Ledvina moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Denial of the seven -foot front setback variance for Woodlynn Heights Townhomes Number 7. B. Approval of the preliminary plat date- stamped December 3, 1999 for the proposed Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 7. Approval is subject to the applicant complying with the following conditions: 1.* Obtaining the city engineer's approval of the final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include grading, utility, drainage and erosion control plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall: (1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (2) Include contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. (3) Show all proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 on the proposed construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 01- 19-2000 2. Paying for costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction plans. 3. Signing a developer's agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Provide five -foot -wide drainage and utility easements along each side lot line between buildings and along the west and east lot lines of this addition. d. Extend the five- foot -wide concrete sidewalk from its current location to the west lot line of this townhouse addition. e. Provide for the repair of Woodlynn Avenue (street and boulevard) after the developer connects to the public utilities and builds the sidewalk. 4. If the developer decides to final plat the preliminary plat, the director of community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. 5.* Submitting the homeowner's association bylaws and rules to the Director of Community Development. These are to assure that there will be one responsible party for the maintenance of the private utilities, driveways and structure. 6.* Providing a written statement from NSP and Amoco Oil Company which allows the grading in the easement that the developer proposes. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Commissioner Rossbach asked if denying the variance but approving the preliminary plat, which shows it with the variance, made the two parts of the motion work against each other. It was Mr. Roberts' o p inion that the preliminary plat was "laying out the box while the variance is more of a site plan /structure within the lot. Commissioner Ledvina said he was recommending denial of.the variance because the aesthetic impact was not significant. Mr. Rossbach did not think a hardshi p was being shown because the buildings are not built or fully planned yet. He did not want to end up with "crummy parking areas and the buildings in the same spot. „ Ayes all The motion passed. Commissioner Pearson asked what the penalty was if developers don't develop according to the plans and use as approved. Mr. Roberts said that, if the change was caught before completion of the project, it could probably be corrected. Mr. Pearson then asked, if swales, setbacks, etc. were not maintained and no fine was imposed, what would keep them from doing it again. Mr. Roberts said that, if drainage problems occurred because a Swale was not maintained and it was necessa ry y for a c crew to correct the problem, these fees could be put on their taxes. 1 i City of Maplewood Official Sign -Up Sheet By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes. Name (first &last) - please pint Address 1-�NAKi< 4 Lo v::fTurJ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. S. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. AGENDA ITEM NOwawl<,.. � - MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Residential Parking Issues and Code Change DATE: February 2, 2000 INTRODUCTION Action by Council Date Endorsed Modified Rejected The city manager recently received a letter from a resident concerned about the parking of vehicles around houses in residential areas. (See the letter on pages 2 and 3.) The planning commission and city council have discussed and reviewed this subject quite extensively over the last 18 months. Mr. Lansdall is asking the city to again consider this matter. BACKGROUND On October 4, 1999, the council reviewed several concerns and alternatives about off- street p arking in residential areas. (See my memo dated September 23, 1999, and proposed ordinance starting on page 4.) The council had varying opinions and concerns with the proposed ordinance and took no action on the matter. Therefore, the city made no changes to the parking ordinance. DISCUSSION Nothing has changed in the city or with Maplewood's ordinances since the council last considered this matter in 1999. The city council should carefully review and consider the options for this issue. RECOMMENDATION Review the attached memo and ordinance and direct staff as to what actions, if any, they want to pursue about the parking of vehicles in residential areas. p\ordlparking.00 Attachments: 1. January 3, 2000 letter from Jack Lansdall 2. September 23, 1999 memo and attachments ` Z�.�G�i r- •�•�.. Attachment 1 T04 ft k 44 �i✓ �,,.+�w'S/���i"t""t'� ��� �t, ,� � � � � G.. aP' frw. �. �` f g j s , � � e ., SHPT �.1� e �' '� ♦ 9s''�. !�o �►,� es .� n d / :00; ..-� p rv e Y r% K! Coo// / � �e► Iry Net )L 6 OrA Go Cl a vt )e J v W O S'I .74 C gt &V E' o vn e N t° wo N4? !t A o ' YS S'asn Q� ex #4 le-i A-rfs �• �t�,C � !o �ftde c� .�c► �� �w'� 1� p�4r lit. • d l y„�- _ _ __ *r% lUP In e woe � o o e 00. o w J?J, % 8 17 fir.► a.y,. � / �e C e�.,.�' � x'9'1 t?1 _ fdr' yo it r s !0s'M _eWt re 1 p so+ c t � 1APP 74PJ .. 7 s p i r4 I?o A vi �ne'Y' 'f'av eti+rrb e r � �' r ip ) P oe 2 /s _ svSc°.ct _ �S I�_ _ p/�r� ��'+,q �p ! • (�i�crre �.Tf ____. An- P a .47' e o (o ier, -t 1774/ F rc vj" �i �.a nom- y ,¢-�. d_ bv 4% jo L y a /0 CAP VOL .r oY �14r� � 'ft �►_ , ,r aft "e r/ & %V A /p x� S l � �' a. c1 f ! v e.. w �. y f � y /Q. �j s .�v 7 .3 rde a Az., �we ve m go* J) vole c 77 -- Co 44W �. � t � 44 e v+ I b ,e Y'S w a K.I 'd o o l� J I'�- ti i 7�: cd 4of "oc( Lwrl &* t o 7X -e- JW * sV C C. n c( 'fir Ta t Vol -� so �.�. p� ��5� -�o�e e vt qn I lot ev ro op 0 o ci omp�VA n T o tTe /< A4X, cl� m emimp) to p /.• Sri- 77?.zp7z._ 3 Attachment 2 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Residential Parking Issues and Code Change DATE: September 23, 1999 INTRODUCTION Councilmember Koppen asked staff to provide a review of current ordinances and issues associated with the parking of vehicles in residential areas. Residents have voiced concerns about the lack of ordinances the city has to deal with vehicles parked on residential lots. BACKGROUND On October 12, 1998, the council reviewed several concerns and alternatives about off - street parking in residential areas. The council directed staff to prepare code changes about off- street parking in residential areas and then send the proposed changes to the planning commission for their input. On February 1, 1999, the planning commission considered an ordinance amendment about parking in residential areas. This change would make the parking of vehicles on dirt, grass or landscaped areas a nuisance and would prohibit the parking of vehicles in front yards except on a hard surface driveway. After much discussion, the commission tabled action on the proposed ordinance amendment and asked staff to get more information and copies of residential parking ordinances from other cities. On February 17, 1999, the planning commission again reviewed this matter. The commission again tabled action on this and asked staff to get more copies of ordinances from other cities. On March 15, 1999, the planning commission again discussed and reviewed this issue. At this meeting, the commission reached a consensus about the major issues and concerns that they want an ordinance to try to regulate. (See the list below in the discussion part of this report.) On May 10, 1999, the city council considered possible changes to the residential parking regulations. The council took no action at this meeting and directed staff to bring this matter back to the council at a council /manager workshop for discussion in the near future. On August 2, 1999, the council again discussed the issues of parking in residential areas. The council directed staff to prepare a draft ordinance that would do several things. The ordinance was to include: 1. Limiting the amount of driveway area or pavement in the front yard. 2. Requiring a paved or hard surface area for parking (not gravel). 3. Requiring a paved driveway with the construction of a new house. 4. Requiring all vehilces parked outside to be licensed and .operable. 5. Requiring a paved driveway when an owner requests a building permit to improve his property. The council also wanted information about properties that the city has recieved complaints about recently. (Please see the memo on page 28.) 4 DISCUSSION The current ordinances address junk vehicles, abandoned vehicles and parking in residential areas in the following manner: Definitions Junk vehicles The ordinance defines junk vehicles in Section 19 -28 (Nuisances) as "a motor vehicle, any trailer, marine craft, snowmobile, mobile home, pick -up camper top, and partially dismantled, which is used for sale of parts or as a source of repair or replacement parts for other vehicles, or which is kept for scrapping, dismantling, or salvage of any kind. A junk vehicle shall also be considered an abandoned vehicle for the purpose of this article." Inooerable Condition Section 19 -28 of the code defines inoperable condition as to mean "that the vehicle has no substantial potential use consistent with its usual function, and shall include a vehicle that: 1. Has a missing or defective part that is necessary for the normal operation of the vehicle; 2. Is stored on blocks, jacks or other supports; or 3. Does not have a current vehicle license." Abandoned vehicles Generally, the city code defines abandoned vehicles as those that are: 1. On public property in violation of either city ordinances or Minnesota Statutes; 2. On private property without the consent of the person in control of the property; 3. Disabled; 4. Not secure from entry; 5. Without license plates conspicuously displayed thereon; or 6. With license plates which have an expiration date more than 90 days prior to the date of inspection. The ordinance allows certain exemptions with respect to abandoned vehicles, two of which sometimes cause concern for neighbors. vehicles that meet the following criteria are not considered to be abandoned: 1. A vehicle screened from view of adjacent residences by landscaping or fencing or kept in an enclosed garage or storage building; and 2. A vehicle which is registered to the owner or occupant of the property and which is being kept for no longer than 30 days in a disabled condition and is kept secure from entry, and provided that only one disabled vehicle may be kept on the property at any given time. 2 Current Remedies Junk Vehicles The community development department receives many calls per year about junk or inoperable vehicles. The current nuisance ordinance (Chapter 19 of the city code) gives city staff the authority to order the removal or clean up of any nuisance causing activity. As an example, if the city determines that there is a junk or inoperable vehicle on a property, city staff will send the property owner a notice to remove the vehicle from the property. This notice usually gives the owner 14 days to remove the vehicle. Parking in yards Parking in yards .(off driveways) in residential areas is more difficult for staff to regulate. The current code does not address the parking of vehicles on residential lots except for the junk or abandoned vehicles as discussed above. The code also is silent on the number of vehicles that property owners may park on their lots. That is, one may now park vehicles anywhere on their property (including the yard) and the city cannot stop it. This issue seems to be one that concerns the public the most. The primary complaint we receive and can do nothing about are cars and recreational vehicles parked in front or side yards instead of on driveways or in garages. POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS For junk or abandoned vehicles, the current city code is adequate and staff does not recommend any changes. The issue of parking vehicles in yards instead of on driveways is more difficult to regulate. There is a fine line between individual property rights and visual blight. Many communities have struggled with this issue. There is obviously no right or wrong solution. If the city council wants to change these ordinances, they must proceed carefully. There are three possible approaches: 1. Limit the parking of vehicles, trailers, recreational vehicles, etc. to hard - surface driveways, to inside buildings and /or to the side and rear yard areas. This also would prohibit the parking of vehicles or trailers in the front yard that are not on an improved surface. We may wish to consider screening requirements if the owner stores the vehicle or trailer in the side or rear yard. 2. Require every motor vehicle or trailer that is parked outside of the garage or building to display license plates with current registration tabs. 3. Restrict the number of vehicles that may be parked on the side or rear yard of properties to two (2) and require that the vehicles be kept at least five feet from rear and side yard property lines. Staff could allow temporary permits for additional short term parking (30 days or less) or the city could require a conditional use permit for longer term storage needs. These approaches are relatively similar to the surrounding communities. City staff did a survey of several surrounding communities in July 1998. (Please see the survey results on page five.) I received copies of residential parking ordinances from Lino Lakes, Oakdale, Saint Louis Park, Woodbury and White Bear Lake. These cities have standards in their codes about parking 3 places, parking location and materials, setbacks, numbers of vehicles and the storage .of recreational vehicles in residential areas. Planning Commission Interests At their March 15, 1999 meeting, the planning commission created a list of issues and priorities that they want the city to cover or address in a new residential parking ordinance. The commission said that such an ordinance should include the following: 1. A statement of purpose and a goal section. 2. Language requiring owners to have improved and designated parking areas in front yards. This is to prevent parking on grass or on landscape areas that then become unsightly and difficult to maintain. 3. Setting a limit or a maximum amount of driveway or hard-surface area for a front yard. This could be up to 30 percent or whatever the city decides is a reasonable limit. 4. Setting limits for the parking and the storage of larger recreational vehicles (RV's) as are done in the Saint Louis Park ordinance. 5. Having a setback from a right -of -way for vehicle parking, especially for RV's. 6. Language allowing the city to approve a conditional use permit giving special parking approval in hardship situations or in unique circumstances where the ordinance does not fit or work for the property owner. 7. Requirements for owners to screen from the neighbors, vehicles and RV's parked in side and rear yards. 8. Setbacks from the side and rear property lines for parking areas and for vehicles. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION On April 5, 1999, the planning commission reviewed their list of interests for a residential parking ordinance. The commission reaffirmed the issues and priorities in the above Fist and asked staff to send the information to the city council for more direction in writing a new ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the ordinance starting on page 29. This ordinance further regulates the parking of vehicles in residential areas. plordlparking.99 Attachments: 1. July 1998 Off - Street Parking Survey 2. Lino Lakes City Code 3. Oakdale City Code 4. Saint Louis Park City Code 5. White Bear Lake City Code 6. Woodbury City Code 7.8 -28 -99 Staff memo 8. Proposed Ordinance Amendment 4 Attachment 1 Off - Street Parking Survey Results July, 1998 Cottage Grove: Vehicles must be licensed and parked on an improved, dust free surface. Parking is allowed in the backyard as long as the vehicle is inoperable and screened from the public. Newport: All vehicles parked in the front yard shall be on concrete, blacktop, or similar durable hard surface free of dust. Residents may park in the backyard as long as not more than 25% of yard is utilized for parking (including driveway). North St. Paul: Licensed vehicles may park off - street in residential front yards as long as not more than half of front yard is covered. Residents may also fill up to half of backyard as well. Oakdale: Vehicles having a lawful capacity of nine (9) passengers or less and licensed must be parked on an improved, dust free surface. Residents allowed to park one recreational vehicle per lot as long as it is behind front setback line. If parked in backyard, it must be five (5) feet from any property line. Shoreview: Vehicles must be licensed and parked on a suitable driveway constructed of an impervious surface. Vehicles are not allowed to be parked in the backyard. Stillwater: All off - street parking shall be surfaced with a minimum of five inches of concrete, or one and a half inches of asphalt overlying four inches of base rock. Parking is not allowed in backyard. White Bear Lake: Vehicles must be licensed and parked on a suitable driveway constructed of concrete or blacktop. No parking is allowed in the backyard. Woodbury: Vehicles must be licensed and parked on a suitable driveway constructed of concrete or blacktop. Vehicles are not allowed to park in the backyard. Attachment 2 Citx of Lino Lake- — ZONING ORDINANCE Q. Electrical Emission, All activities which create electrical emissions shall comply with the minimum requirements of the Federal Communications Commission. R. Exterior Storage. 1. aural and Residential zoning Districts. 1 a. Exce tions& All personal property in a residential zone and /or on properties ten (10) acres in sue or less shall be stored within a building or fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties and public streets, except for the following: 1) Laundry drying. 2) Non - vehicular recreational equipment. 3) Horne heating fuel tanks, 4) Stacked firewood. 5) Construction and landscaping materials or equipment currently (within a period of twelve (12) months) being used on the premises. 6) Agricultural equipment and materials, if these are used or intended for use on the premises. 7) Off- street parking of licensed passenger automobiles and pick up trucks in designated driveway or parking area, surfaced in compliance with Section Subd. 5.C.8416f this Ordinance. 3 >* b, Recreational and Utility Vehicle and Tr_aiLer %orate. Recreational vehicles, as defined by Section 3, Subd. 2 of this Ordinance may be parked or stored on a residential site provided that: (1) The vehicles are registered to or rented by a resident of the dwelling on such site, provided that: (2) The vehicles have affixed thereto current registration or license plates as required by law. (3) The vehicles are stored no closer than five {5} feet from side and rear lot lines. lu 3.27 on 9 20/Z0 ' d 89Str V9V Z S9 S3XUI ON I - 1 d0 ill I D 90:9T 666 T - ZO -H3d 20 ad Id101 City of Lino La kes - ZONIN Q RDINANCE (4) The vehicles located within front yard areas are .confined to designated driveways or parking areas surfaced in compliance with Section , Subd. 4:R of this ordinance. (5) All front yard storage comply with the following setbacks from street curb and pavement lines: Street C lassification Minimum setback from curb /pavement line Major Arterial 30 feet Minor Arterial 30 feet Collector 20 feet Local 15 feet (6) No vehicle shall be parked in a manner that blocks a city or county park or trail. (7) The vehicles are not connected to any water or sewage disposal system an the residential property where the same is so parked or stared. 2. Commercial Industrial and Public/Seml- Rublic Zonin Districts. a. Exterior Storac . Exterior storage shall be governed by the respective zoning district in which such use is located, b. Exceptions.,_ All exterior storage shall be screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties and public streets except for the following: 1) Merchandise being displayed for sale in accordance with zoning district requirements. 2) Materials and equipment currently being used for construction on the premises. C. Parking of commercial Vehicle$. Up to three (3) commercial vehicles such as delivery and service trucks up to eleven thousand seventy -five (1 1,075) pounds of gross weight ratting may be parked Ij without screening if such vehicles relate to the principal use. Construction equipment, trailers, and vehicles over eleven M41 20/20 89sv V9b SS9 7 10 SD1dl ON I 1 AO ill I 0 LO: 9T 666 T- EO -E9_� Attachment 3 2 -02 -1999 1:30PM FROM CITY OF OAKDALE 812 730 2820 (f) Side and Rear Setbacks. Subject to regulations contained in the Building Code and other applicable regulations, buildings may be excluded from side and rear setback requirements provided party walls are used and if the adjacent buildings are constructed as an integral. unit. Such uses must have been allowed by this Zoning Code as Permitted or Special Uses. S S -161 Off- Street Parking Requirem* emts. Lee, (a) General Provisions:, (Y } Floor Area. The terra "floor area" for the purpose of calculatm'g the number of off- street parkins spaces required shall be determined on the basis of the exterior floor area dimensions of the buildings, structure or use tunes the number of floors minus (2) Non- Conforming Structure Should a non- confornning structure or use be damaged or destroyed (defined as fifty (50) percent or more of the struct=e being damaged) by fire, it may be re- established if elsewhere permitted in these coning regulations, except that in doing so, any off-street paving or, loading space which existed before, shall be retained and expanded as necessary to comply with the standards herein. (3) Change of Use or Occupancy of Buildings. Any change of use or occupancy of . any building or buildings, including additions thereto requiring more parking, shall not be permitted until there is furnished such additional parking space as required by these zoning regulations. (4) Parking Accessory to a Residential Usc. Off-Street parking on land within a residential district shall be utilized .only for the following items: A) currently licensed and operable passenger vehicles having a lawful capacity of nine (9) passengers or less; B) for the parking of one (1) commercial usage vehicle per dwelling unit, provided that it is paxked in a garage or other lawfully constructed building; C) for the parking of one (1) public utility vehicle registered to a company that provides emergency repair services and is used by the occupant of the residence. D) RECREATIONAL VEHICLES 1 You are allowed to p ark one (1) currently licensed and operable recreational vehicle on your lot in a residential district. 2) All recreational vehicles are to be parked behind their district's front setback line. SECTION 25 -151 to 25 -180 PAGE 74 Revi 8 11 2 -02 -1999 1:30PM FROM CITY OF OAKDALE 612 730 2820 3 Recreational vehicles are allowed to be parked in your side and rear yard five (5) feet from any property line. on corner lots, both yards abutting a street shall be considered a front yard. 4) Recreational vehicles are allowed in front of their district's front setback Hae for a period of forty -eight (48) hours for the purpose of loading and unloading. A) for the parking of personal watercraft, trailers, campers and camping buses from May 1 to Nov. 1. B) For the parking of snowmobiles from Nov.1 to the following April 30. „ C) Above to are to be parked a m um fnafteea (15) feet from the back of the curb or roadway. (5) Parking in residential areas shall be limited to driveways only, except as provided La other articles of City Ordinance. (b) Stall, Aisle, and Driveway Des' (1) Parldng Dimensions. The .followincr shall be the- minimum paiking. space dime nsions. (2) within Structures. The off -street parking requirements may be furnished by P providing spaces so designated within the principal building or structure attached thereto; however, unless provisions are made, no building permit shall be used to convert said parking structure into a dwelling unit or living area or other activity until adequate provisions are made to comply with the required off-street parking ordinances of this ordinance. (3) Circulation Between Bays. Except in the case of single, two - family, townhouse, triplex and quadraminium dwellings, parking areas shall be designed so that circulation between parking bays or aisles occur within the designated parking lot and does not depend upon a public street or alley. Except in the case of single, SECTION 25 -151 to 25 -180 Revised 7-28 -98 PAGE 75 P. 3 9 12 L )E�'G� TH.. AISLE 'D' 90 degrees 9 18' 25' 60 degrees 9' 18' 19' 45 degrees 9' 18' 13' Parallel 8' 22' . (2) within Structures. The off -street parking requirements may be furnished by P providing spaces so designated within the principal building or structure attached thereto; however, unless provisions are made, no building permit shall be used to convert said parking structure into a dwelling unit or living area or other activity until adequate provisions are made to comply with the required off-street parking ordinances of this ordinance. (3) Circulation Between Bays. Except in the case of single, two - family, townhouse, triplex and quadraminium dwellings, parking areas shall be designed so that circulation between parking bays or aisles occur within the designated parking lot and does not depend upon a public street or alley. Except in the case of single, SECTION 25 -151 to 25 -180 Revised 7-28 -98 PAGE 75 P. 3 9 12 2 -02 -1999 1:31RM FROM CITY OF OAKDALE 612 730 2820 two- family, townhouse, triplex and quadraminium dwellings, parking area design which requires backing into the public street is prohibited. (4) Preserving off -Site Parldug. when required accessory. off-street parking facilities are provided elsewhere than on the lot in which the same ownership or control, either by deed or long -terns lease, as the property occupied by such principal use, the owner of the principal use shall file a recordable document vVith the City requiring the owner and his or her heirs and assigns to maintain the required number of off- street spaces durin the existence of said principal use. (5) Driveways Required. All off - street parking spaces shall have access from driveways and not -directly from the public street. (6) Distance from Intersection. No curb cut access shall be located less than forty • (4Q) feet from ..the intersection of two {2} or more street rights -of -way. •This distance shall be measured from.the intersection of lot lines. (7) Curb Cut 'width. No curb cut access shall exceed 24 feet in width at the gutter elevation unless approved by the City Engineer. (8) Distance Between Curb Cuts. Driveway access curb opew'ng oz a public street except for single, two- family, and townhouse buildings shall aot be located less than forty (40) feet from one another. (9) Number of Curb Cuts.. Each property shall be allowed one curb cut access for each 100 feet of street frontage. All property shall be entitled to at least one curb cut. Single family uses shall be limited to one curb cut access per property. These conditions shall apply unless otherwise granted approval by the City Council. (10) Grade. The grade elevation of any parking area shall not exceed five (5) percent. (11) Surfacing. All dxiveways to be utilized for parking, shall a surfaced with bit mz nous, concrete, or brick. Addidozaal of"- street parking areas to be surfaced with bituminous, concrete, brick, Class v, or other materials as approved by the City. Plans for surfacing and drainage of dzi veways and stalls for five (5) or more vehicles shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and the final drainage plan shall be subject to written approval by the City Engineer. (12) Striping. Except for single, two- family, triplex, and quadraminiums, all parking stalls shall be marked with painted lines not less than four (4) inches wide. (13) Lighting. Any lighting used to illuminate an off street parking area shall be so arranged as to reflect the light away from adjoining property, abutting residential uses and public right -of -ways and be in compliance with this Ordinance. SECTION 25 -151 to 25 -180 PAGE 76 Revised 7 -28 -98 10 13 R. 4 y 2 -02 -1999 1:33PM FROM CITY OF OAKDALE 612 730 2820 (5) Off -site parking for multiple family dwellings shall not be located more than 100 feet from any normally used entrance of the principal use served. (6) Off -site parking for non-residential uses shall not be located more than 300 feet from th e main entrance of the principal use being seared. No more than one main entrance shall be recognized for each principal building. (7) Any use which depends upon off - site parking to meet the requirements of this Ordinance shall mairit ownership and parking utilization of the off -site location until such time as on -site parking is. provided or a site in closer proximity to the principal al use is acquired and developed for parkitg. h) Installation of Asphalt Driveways and Parkin Lots (3) Minim= pavement sections for driveways and parking lots shall be: (a) Driveways for residential buildings with four (4) units or less per building: 2331 bituminous wearing course two (2) inches compacted Class V aggregate base - six (6) inches compacted. (b) Parking lots and driveways for residential buildings with wore th four (4) units per building, and commercial, industrial, and institutional areas: 2341 bituminous gearing course - two (2) inches compacted 2331 bituminous binder course two (2) inches compacted Class V aggreg base six (6) inches compacted unless alternates are approved, in writzn by the City. In all cases, alternate pavement sections shall be conside only if sufficient data to justify another pavement design, based on th current Mianesota Kxghway Depar=e* nt design procedure for llexibl p p pavement is submitted as art of a forrzlal alternate request. If, based the plan that is presented, the wilding Inspector determines that the proposed driveway or parking lot construction is not deemed adequa to traffic volumes or types of traffic, additional construction material SCTIOIv' 2; -x 51 to 2� -180 pACx 81 Revised 7 -28 -98 11 The following procedure and - specifications shall be required for all asphalt driveway construction from streets to private garages, and for all parking lot construction. • . . Work conducted within the Fdght -of - Way shall follow the procedures of Chapter 20_ (I) The driveway or parking lot shall be excavated to remove all organic or other unstable soils from the area to be surfaced. (2) The area to be surfaced shall be graded and compacted to the elevation that will permit the placement of the full pavement section. an ate g, red e e on to due s may R. 9 14 Attachment 4 02/04/99 15:32 To:Ken Roberts From:Scott Moore OUT1 Page 1/8 ORDINANCE NO. 2110 -98 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY AMENDING SECTIONS 14:3 -1, 14:5 -4.1, 14:6 -1.2.B AND 14:6 -1.2.0 RELATING TO VEHICLE PARKING AND THE PARKING AND OUTSIDE STORAGE OF COMMERCIAL AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Findings Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 96 -7 -ZA) and has adopted, contemporaneous with new ordinance, the findings of City staff. Sec. 2. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Sections 14:3 -1 Definitions, Section 14:5 -4.1 Residential Restrictions and Performance Standards, Section 14:6 -1.2.B Parking General Provisions, and Section 14:6 -1.2.0 Design and Maintenance of Off - Street Parking Areas are hereby amended to read as follows: Section 14:3 -1 DEFIti ITIONNS Add the following definitions: Commercial V` ehicles A motor vehicle is a commercial vehicle if: (1) the vehicle is a dump truck, a step van, a tow truck, a semi tractor or trailer, a tank truck, a tractor, a bus, a cargo track. a construction vehicle or equipment, an earth moving vehicle or equipment, a van or pickup «rith a manufacturer's nominal rated carrying capacity of more than one ton, or any other vehicle which is used in connection with commercial activities; (2) commercial equipment has been added to the vehicle such as winches or snow plows; (3) commercial racks have been added to the vehicle for the purpose of holding equipment or materials; (4) the vehicle is a pickup with a non- standard pickup box; or (5) the vehicle is a trailer loaded with another commercial vehicle or commercial equipment. 12 15 02/04/99 15:32 To :Ken Roberts From:Scott Moore OUT1 Page 218 Drive«ray An improved access which connects an off-street parking space to the public right of way. N =lotor Vehicle Every• vehicle which is self propelled. This does not include lawn mowers or snow blowers. Ton- passenger Vehicle A commercial or recreational vehicle or trailer. Parking Space .an improved paved or -gravel area on a lot or within a building untended for parking of a motor vehicle which has a means of access to a public street. This term is used interchangeably with parking stall and parking facility. Passenger Vehicle An automobile, station «ragon, van, sports utility vehicle, minivan, pickup trick, or motor cycle designed and primarily intended for on- street operation. Passenger vehicles do not include commercial vehicles, recreational vehicles, racing cars or stock cars. Pick -Up Truck Airy truck with a manufacturer's nominal rated carrying capacity of one ton or less and commonly known as a pick -up or pickup trick and which has a standard manufactured pickup box. A pick -up whose standard box is covered with a topper if the topper does not exceed 1 l./2 times the wall height of the standard box is a pick -up truck. Racine Car. A motor vehicle designed or intended for operation on a speedway, racetrack, or other facility used or designed for high speed contests between two (2) or more vehicles or for tinning of speed. Racing cars are regulated under Section 10 -601 of the Municipal Code Recreational Vehicle (1) Travel trailers including those that telescope or fold down, chassis mounted campers, house cars, motor homes, tent trailers, slip in campers and converted vans that are motor homes as defined herein. (2) Motor Home. A vehicle that pro --ides temporary living quarters. A vehicles provides temporary living quarters if it: (a) is not used as the residence of the owner or occupant: (b) is used for temporary living quarters by the owner or occupant while engaged in recreational or vacation activities; and (c) is self - propelled or capable of being totiz"ed on public roads. (3) A non - motorized trailer intended and generally used for transporting boats. (4) Snowmobiles, all terrain vehicles, boats and any type of water craft. Such vehicles which are placed on a utility trailer shall, together with the trailer, be considered a single recreational vehicle. Stock Car A motor -v-ehicle of standard design and construction which is modified, adapted or altered in anti nnan ner to increase its speed or safety, and designed or intended for operation on a speedway, racetrack, or other facility used or designed for high speed contests between two (2) or more vehicles or for timing of speed. Stock cars are regulated under Section 10 -601 of the N.1unicipal Code. 2 13 16 02/04/99 15:32 To:Ken Roberts From:Scott Moore OUT1 Page 3/8 Stand or standing Anvy halting even momentarily of a vehicle, whether occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily for the purpose of and v%rhile actually engaged in receiving or discharging passengers or property. Trailer. Any vehicle designed for carrying property on its own structure and for being drawn by a motor vehicle. Trailer bed That portion of a trailer that is designed to make contact with and bear the weight of the load to be carried. Truck. Every motor vehicle designed, used or maintained primarily for the transportation of prope.rt3% "Truck" does not include a pick -up truck as defined above or a van with a manufacturer's nominal rated carrying capacity of one ton or less. Vehicle. A device for carrying or conveying persons or property which may be self - propelled or may be propelled, drawn, or towed b a self - propelled vehicle. Section 14:5 -4.1 RESIDENTIAL RESTRICTIONS AND PERFOR STANDARDS: (Add A. Purpose and B. Definitions; Renumber existing A as C) A. Purpose The Cite Council finds that in areas set aside by the Zoning Ordinance for residential development certain performance standards are desirable in order to preserve neighborhood character, public health and safety•, property values, and allow all residents a reasonable use and enjo` inent of property. To this purpose the City Council finds that the use and possession of commercial and recreational vehicles are an important factor in the lives of a substantial number of residents of the City of St. Louis Park. The Council finds that certain types and sizes of commercial and recreational vehicles, the improper storage of commercial and recreational vehicles, and the parking of and storage of excessive numbers of vehicles can affect the neighborhood character as well as public health and safety, property values, and the reasonable use and enjoyment of neighboring properties. While the ability of recreational vehicle owners to provide for the security of and access to their vehicles is a reasonable expectation, they have a responsibility to respect the rights of residents, o %vners, and users of neighboring properties and to avoid interference with the purposes of the zoning district in which they are located. The City Council further finds that the establislunent of these regulations ffirther the goals in the. City's Comprehensive Plan relative to enhancement of residential neighborhoods and similar goals expressed in Vision St. Louis Park. The City Council establishes these regulations as a means to balance the interests of the owners of commercial and recreational vehicles, adjacent residents and the public. B. Definitions. For the purpose of Sections 14:5- 4.1.C.8, 9 and 10, the listed terms are defined as follows: "Front Ward" means the area between a line created by extending the front face of the principal building and the street in front of the house. 3 14 17 02/04/99 15:32 To:Ken Roberts From:Scott Moore OUT1 Page 4/8 "Back Yard" means the area between a line created by extending the rear face of the principal building and the rear lot line. "Side Yard" means area between the front and back building walls and the side lot line. C. General Provisions (,Amend No. 2 to read in its entirety as follows; and add Nos 8 -15) 2. The stopping, standing or parking of any motor vehicle, recreation vehicle, commercial vehicle, or trailer is subject to all restrictions below and under Section 14:6 -1. 8. Except as provided in Paragraphs 9 and 15 herein, no motor vehicle, recreational vehicle, commercial vehicle, or trailer shall be pennitted to stand or park in any "R" Use District which exceeds any of the following: a. 8 feet in height, measured from the ground to the highest point on the vehicle at recommended tire pressure. For the purpose of measuring height, all accessories, attaclunents, and materials carried upon a vehicle shall be considered part of the vehicle; b. 22 feet in length, measured at the longest point of the vehicle or, if a trailer, the horizontal distance between the front and rear edges of the trailer bed. For the purpose of measuring length, all accessories, attachments, and materials carried upon a vehicle shall be considered part of the vehicle or trailer bed; or c 6,500 pounds, empty weight including the box. 9. One recreational vehicle which exceeds an of the limits set forth in paragraph 8 and is owned by the occupant of the premises can be parked in the back yard area if a. The vehicle is parked no closer than 5 feet from any property line. b. If the property is a multifamily property, the vehicle must be stored on a concrete or bituminous surface and the parking space must be in excess of the minimum number of parking spaces required by this Ordinance Code. 10. Parking and storage of vehicles in the R -1, R -2, and R -3 Zoning Districts. The following provisions shall apply to the parking and storage of vehicles on residential parcels. a. No more than three (3) vehicles can be parked or stored outside an enclosed building at a single family residence. For a duplex, six (6) vehicles can be parked or stored outside. If there are more than three persons residing at a single family dwelling %vho have valid Minnesota driver's licenses showing the residence address, then the total number of vehicles allowed to be parked outside is increased to a number equal to the number of licensed drivers residing at the propert} not to exceed five (5) -\•ehicles. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply during snow emergencies. 4 15 IV 02/04/99 15:32 To:Ken Roberts From:Scott Moore OUT1 Page 5/8 b. No more than two non- passenger vehicles can be parked on a residential lot outside of an enclosed building. Except as permitted in Section 14:5- 4.1.C.9 above, these vehicles shall be stored on a designated parking space. Non-passenger vehicles cannot be parked or stored in a front yard or a side yard abutting a street except as allowed under g below. C. Only commercial vehicles which do not exceed any of the size requirements under Section 14:5- 4.1.C.8 and are designed exclusively for on- street use can be parked on residential lots outside an enclosed building. Commercial vehicles shall be parked only within a garage or on a designated parking space and cannot be parked or stored in a front yard or a side yard abutting a street except as permitted under g below. d. Except as permitted in Section 14:5- 4.1.C.9, all vehicles must be stored on a surface improved for driveway purposes with an approved paving surface. e. No more than one recreational vehicle which exceeds the size requirements in Section 14:5- 4.I.C.8 can be parked on a residential lot outside an enclosed building. f. No non- passenger vehicle can be parked within 5 feet of an interior side lot line or rear lot line. g. No non- passenger vehicle can be parked within the front yard or within a side yard abutting a street except where designated parking space is permitted under Section 14:6- 1.2.C.12. Under no circumstances can a non - passenger vehicle which exceeds the size limitations in Section 14:5 - 4.1.C.8 be parked in a front yard. h. No non - passenger vehicle can be parked on a residential lot if the vehicle is not owned or leased by the occupant of the premises where it is parked or is a commercial vehicle owned by the employer of an occupant who is using the vehicle for business purposes. i. Only one (1) tow truck can be parked on a residential property. j. Parking is not permitted within a driveway in the R1, R2, or R3 Districts within 5' of the curb of a public street. In the absence of a curb, parking shall not be permitted '%vithin 5 feet of the traveled public roadway. In no event can a vehicle be parked in such a manner as to block a public sidewalk. k. The total area in the front y ard of a single family lot improved for parking and driveway purposes shall not exceed 30% of a front yard area. Additionallti-, the average width of a driveway shall not be more than 22 feet «vide. This provision Nvill not prohibit an average driveway width of up to 22 feet for all single family lots. 1. Recreational vehicles 6 feet in height or less at their highest points may be parked in one non - driveway side yard on a residentially zoned lot provided that they are 10 feet or more from the adjacent residence and do not extend bevond the front buildinp, wall of the house. .. v 11. One vehicle with an attached snow plow can be parked outside of an enclosed building between November 1 or the first 2 inch snow fall, whichever occurs first, 16 19 02/04/99 15:32 To:Ken Roberts From:Scott Moore OUT1 Page 6/8 and April 30. This vehicle will be considered to be a commercial vehicle when applying this Ordinance. 12. Snow plows and other commercial equipment must be stored within an enclosed structure when not attached to a vehicle. 13. Outdoor storage offish houses is not permitted on a residential lot. 14. On- street parking of non - passenger vehicles is not permitted within any "R" Use District. 15. The following are exempt from the provisions in this subsection: a. Any vehicle being used in conjunction with a temporary service benefiting the property. b. Vehicles used in conjunction with authorized construction sites between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. 1XIonday through Friday and behveen 9 a.m. and 10 p.m. on weekends and holidays. C. N'ehicles used in conjunction with authorized public works construction. d. Recreational vehicles can be parked temporarily while being loaded or unloaded or during routine maintenance and servicing not exceeding 48 consecutive hours. Section 14:6 -1.2.B GENERAL PROVISIONS (Delete No. 8; amend as follows and renumber No. 9 as No. 8; amend No. 14 to read ul its entirety as follows; and renumber Nos 10 -15 to 9 -14) 8. Location of Parking Facilities. Required off- street parking in the R -1, R -2, and R- 3 Districts shall be on the same lot as the building housing the principal use, except in the cases of : a. Religious institution Nvhere parking is regulated by Sub - Section 14:6 - 1.2.D.22 b. Condominium developments where off - street parking is designed on a lot or within a garage, on a separate parcel but within the same condominium development. Required off- street parking spaces shall be located within an enclosed building or if outside, shall be located behind a line created by extending the front building wall of the principle structure to the side lot lines and shall not be located within a side yard abutting a street except as permitted under Section 6- 1.2.C.12. Parking shall not be permitted on any landscaped area except as permitted under Section 5- 4.1.0.9. Passenger vehicles can be parked on private driveways in the front yard 6 17 NEI 82/ 04/99 15:32 To:Ken Roberts From:Scott Moore OUT1 Page 7/8 or side yard abutting a street of single- family or two-family dwelling units provided these vehicles meet the requirements of this Section and of this Ordinance. 14. Conversion of Garage Space. No person shall alter a garage to living space or storage space in such a way that prevents the use of the garage for parking vehicles in any "R" Use District, unless other legal provisions are made to provide the required parking for the lot. Section 14:6 -1.2.0 DESIGN AND TMAINTENANCE OF OFF- STREET PARKING AREAS ( Amend No. 12 to read in its entirety as follows:) 12. Yards. Parking stalls shall be subject to the requirements of front yards and side yards abutting a street in all "R" Use Districts, except that in the "R -1 ", "R -2 ", and "R -3'' Use Districts, required off - street parking for a detached single family or two family- house shall be permitted in the front yards under the following conditions: a. There is no other location on the lot where parking is possible, and the front yard offers the only space where the required parking can be located. b. Total parking and driveway area does not occupy more than 30% of the front yard and the average « of the driveway does not exceed 22 feet. Sec. 3. The contents of Planning Case File 96 -7 -ZA are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Sec.4. This Ordinance shall take effect November 1. 1998. 7 21 FjZ0M*' OF WHITE BEAR LAKE Attachment 5 4701 Highway 61 &YAj*77hA 5�WO 00 fO= � 1�Q��TS , M Af White Bear Lake MN 55110 Z/Z? _ - 7 - 70- q5_b1--> §1302.030 ZONING CODE §1302.030 Subd. 11. Dust and Other Particulate Matter. The emission of dust, fly ash or other particulate matter by any use shall be in compliance with and regulated by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota Regulation APC 1 -15, as amended. Subd. 12. Qd,ors The emission of odor by any use shall be in compliance with and regulated by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards g Minnesota Regulation APC 1 -15, as amended. Subd. 13. The emission of noise by any use shall be in compliance with City Ordinance relating to noise. Subd. 14. fleNse. a) D of Refuse In addition to definitions of "refuse" listed in Section 502.050 of this Code, trucks, station wagons and automobiles, not including classic or pioneer cars as defined in M.S.A. Section 168.10, n t currently licensed by the State to the owner of rivate roe on which or which are, property �y h ch they set, e because of mechanical deficlenc , inca able of movement under their own ower parked or store out are considered refuse. P or Refuse shall mean piles of branc es or brush, dismantled or non - working appliances or equipment, unused containers of an design, or grass and non-erected Y s gn, bags of leaves g ected fencing. b) Prghibitiori. To protect and promote the interests of ublic welfare safety • en p ety and health, it shall be unlawful too openly store refuse of garbage, as defined in §1302.030 Subd. 14a of this s code, on any portion of a yard in any Any refuse or garbage shall be stored in an enclosed building and rigid closed container dLssigned for such storage. The own i a in such g owner of a vacant lot shall be responsible for keeping g h land free of all refuse and garbage. (Ref. Ord. No. 806 31141 90) c) i ! on -- Curbalde S oraae All stored refuse or garbage shall be kept at or behind the front line of any house, apartment or commercial building g at all times except between sunset the night before scheduled refuse or garbage collection and the r' t me of collection on the following day. Own- ers of property found in violation of this subdivision Subdivision without notice. on 14c), may be cited for violation d) N91 It, ... Whenever the Code Enforcement Officer determines that there are reasonable grounds to believe that there has been a violation of this subdivision except Subdivision 14c); he shall utilize the notice of violation procedure contained in §§ 502.030 and 502.040 of this Code. e) gefuse Not .nnsi. ting of h4o±o; Vehicles. The notice provided by the Code Enforcement Officer of illegally stored or piled garbage or refuse not including motor vehicles shall state that, if within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the notice the violation his not been corrected, the City, at its discretion, may dispose of the refuse or garbage and bill the property owner for the City disposal and reasonable administrative costs Incurred. If repayment of such City costs is not forthcoming within thirty (30) days of 19 22 283 Corrected 3/14/95 CITY OF VJH 1T� P FAR LAKE 1. 't . - . _• C* v 51 White bear Lake, MN 55110 §1302.030 ZONING CODE §1302.030 actual disposal, the City Council shall cause all costs of such d ispos- � al to be assessed against the property in accordance with the procedure W 1�� for assessment in M.S.A. Section 429.061 and subsequent amendments pe&i "u.�[ thereto. f ) Refuse Consisting of Motor Vehicles In the event refuse consisting of you mu i a motor vehicle is illegally stored, the Ci shall give the owner of � U the vehicle notice of the violation and i fteen (15) days to take ., �� . corrective action. An owner has taken corrective action when the vehicle is legally parked and licensed, mechanically operable, and in jF- 404 90 com liance with all state requirements for an operable vehicle on 10Ul,.e W.. pub is roads . In the event corrective action is not taken within TO SC�Uo., fifteen (15) days from the notice of the violation, the City may take he vehicle into custody, impound it, and sell it immediately at public �F NOT�o� auction pursuant to M.S.A. section 1688.08. � Yi TD g) Right of Entry The Code Enforcement Officer is hereby authorized and directed to enter onto private property to investigate any complaint TK - nTL6 . for a violation or any apparent violation of this Subdivision or to dispose of any garbage or refuse stored or piled in violation of this Code. The property owner and every property occupant shall give the Code Enforcement Officer free access to the property at all reasonable times for the purpose of such investigation or disposal. h) Limited Exceptions The City Council is hereby empowered to grant limited exceptions to the requirements of Subdivisions 14 and 15 of this Section as recommended by the Variance Board. A re uest for exception to any requirement of these subdivisions may be filed with the Zoning Administrator in accordance with Section 1301.060, Subd. 2 of the Code at any time before a notice of an alleged violation has been served, or within ten (10) days after the day a notice of viola- tion has been served. Composting as permitted under the Composting Municipal Code Section 509 is a limited exception to this ordinance. Said excep tion does not require Council as described above. p (Ref. Ord. No. 863, 2/11/92) Subd, 159 Exterior Storage a) All materials and equipment and motor vehicles shall be stored with buildings or fully screened areas so as n in of to be visible from adjoin- ing properties, except for the following: 1) Firewood piles which are neatly stacked and free from vermin shall be stored in the rear and side yards only. In the case of corner lots, both yards abutting a public right of way re considered a front yard. y Motor Vehicles, recreational equipment and vehicles shall be stored J subject to the following chart and regulations � 1) Any vehicle parked on residential property for sale by owners of the property must be owned and licensed to the property owner and shall be parked on a designated driveway. 2) The parking of motor vehicles, recreational equipment and vehicles is prohibited in the front yard. C0<1 � U(�b 283.1 Revised 2/11/92 20 23 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE 4701 Highway 61 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 OF §1302.030 ZONING CODE §1302.030 c) Permitted Storage Type of Vehicle Permitted Location Numberical Restriction Automobiles; motorcycles, or trucks, pick -ups and vans with a capacity not to exceed one (1) ton and having a gross vehicle weight of twelve thousand (12,000) pounds, whichev- er is less Recreation vehicles and equipment Commercial usage vehicles On the designated drive- way and /or on one hard surface space located adjacent to a drivew%all or garage. Said space not be located in front of the principal struc- ture's living area. One Vehicle per licensed driver residing on the premises. In a garage or other law- None fully constructed build- ing. On the designated drive- None way and /or on one hard surface space located adjacent to a driveway or garage. Said space Shall not be located in f ront of the principal struc- ture's living area. In a garage or other law- None fully constructed build- ing In the rear or side except for corner In that case both abutting a street be considered a yard, yards None lots. yards shall front In a garage or other law- One vehicle per dwelling fully constructed build- unit ing ( Inoperable vehicles In a garage or other law- None fully constructed build- ing Note: Only one hard surface area adjacent to the driveway or garage shall be permitted for single family and two family dwellings. (Ref r . No. 718, 6/10/86 7, 3/14/90; 840 06/11/91) p� 283.2 Revised 06/11/91 ! i NO P. v C-AS. At-GO Ate- I N.i.{ D1�b fry VW • . ._ ..r- �.....�.. - ._- ....r. . .. ... .. ..•...- ...w.. v-.r +� i,.• -.... . �r .w.I.•.�Y+MMwAii/•.a�wAr.. 1�K.M.'- �`..�.�.'•I -._... M.1�' -.n .. _ �,..... .. ... .. §1301.030 ZONING CODE §1301.030 Subd. 9. "1" Definitions Inoperable Vehicles. Any motor vehicle including but not limited to any automobile, truck, trailer, marine craft, snow mobile, motorcycle, all terrain vehicle, equipment for motorized transportation that; (1) has a missing or defective part that is necessary for the normal operation of the vehicle; or (2) is stored on blocks, jacks or other supports; or (3) is not currently licensed. (Ref. Ord. No. 803, 3/14/90) 21 24 §1301.030 ZONING CODE §1301.030 Recreation. Field or Building An area of land, water, or any building in which amusement, recreation or athletic sports are provided for public or semipublic use, whether temporary or permanent, except a theatre whether provision is made for the accommodation of an assembly or not. A golf course, arena, baseball park , stadium circus or gymnasium is a recreation field or building for the purpose of this Code. Recreational Vehicle. Campers, pick -ups with campers or mounted toppers, motor homes, all terrain vehicles marine craft, camping trailers, and snow mobiles. Also a. trailer used to transport recreational vehicles shall itself be a recreational vehicle. (Ref. Ord. No. 803, 3/14190) Commercial--Usage- Vehicles. (Ref. No. 803, 3/14/90; 839, 6/11/91) a) Vehicles and equipment designed or modified for use in any construction, demolition or maintenance � Hance activity. Provided that vehicles and equipment used for maintenance, repair or construction on the premises may be parked during the period of work; b) Tractors other than those intended for residential purposes; c) All trailers or towed equipment which have a capacity greater than P tY 9 one (1) ton or having a gross vehicle weight over twelve thousand (12,000) pounds, whichever is less; d) Trucks, and pickups which have a capacity greater than one (1) ton or having gross vehicle weight 9 9 over twelve thousand (12,000) pounds, whichever is less. e) Step vans designed or modified for the transportation of cargo, freight, constructs ' 9 9 on machinery, equipment, materials or implements. (Ref. Ord. No. 839, 6/11/91) Commercial Use - The principal use of land or buildings for the sale lease rental o trade of products, goods, and services. (Ref. Ord. 915, 12113/94) Securi "partment; A single rental Housing unit for no more than (2) persons employed as security or management for the facility in which the apartment is located. The unit is subordinate to the principal structure, which can only be established by Conditional Use Permit and which is subject to performance stan- dards. (Ref. Ord. No. 766, 8/9/88) Semipublic Use - The use of land by a private, o non rfit organization to • s P . 9 provide a public service that i ordinarily open to some persons outside the regularconst�tuenc of the organizati Y g on. (Ref. Ord. 915, 12!13194) Setback. The minimum horizontal distance between a structure sewage treatment • • ty • g • tment system, or other facility and an ordinary high water level, the top of a bluff, road, highway, roe line o facility. • y property rtY r other facility. Distances are to be measured from the most outwardly extended portion of the structure at round level provided hereinafter. (Ref. Ord. 915 g except as Sewage Treatment Svst m - A septic tank and soil absorption system or other individual P Y er individual or cluster type sewage treatment system as described and regulated in Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's stems a document titled "Individual Sewage Treatment Systems S t an dards, Chapter 7080. (Ref. Ord. 915, 12/13/94) CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE 4701 Highway 61 243 Revised 12/13/94 White Bear Lake, NI N 55110 22 25 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE 4701 Highway 61 White Bear Lake, MN 5510 tow 5 6 0 3.0 8 0 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS S603.090 been fully paid. The City Manager shall have the further authority to direct employees of the City to remove any such vehicle and in that event the City Manager may impose a charge to be paid to the Ci �y Clerk before said vehicle may be taken or recovered by the owner thereof. In the event that anv vehicle held or stores? by the direction of the City Manager, upon which there are charges for storage , or towing or both, shall not be reclaimed, recovered or taken by the owner thereof, there shall be deemed to be imposed upon such vehicle a possessory lien in the amount so charged and unpaid and should, the owner thereof fail to pay the same then the possessory lien may be foreclosed in the manner provided for by law. (Ref. §502.070, Code 1966; Ord. Nos. 439, 12/13/66; 574, - 6/24/75 ) f 603.090 PARKING; GENERAL RESTRICTIONS. No vehicle shall be par'ced in violation of any of the following provisions; Subd. 1. No person, firm or corporation ope ra tinq any public garage shall park vehicles cn the streets adjacent to or in the vicinity of such public garage for z longer period than ninety (90) rn.inute s . Subd. 2. No vehicle shall be parked within eighty (30' ) feet of the point where the property line proj would intersect a street upon which buses are operated, - where the corner where such intersection takes place is used as a bus stop. Subd. 3. No vehicle shall be parked within thirty (30' ) feet of any arterial, stop sign or sign indicatincT the direction for travel. Wt Subd. 4. No vehicle shall be parked on the approaches to an bridge, nor upon any boulevard, lawn or grass :lot. Subd. 5.. No vehicle shall be parked in a loading zcne of a .Municipal Pa +king Lot except for purposes of loading and unloading and then only for the length of time rea sonab 1; necessary there `or . Subd. 6. do vehicle shall be oarked in any alley except for purposes of loading and unloading unless at least ten ( 10' ) feet of the alley is left available for the free movement of tra `:f ic & 2:� d. 7. Vo vehicle shall be parked cr le:- standinS upon the private property of anv person without the consent of such orooer :v owner. -ft 23 26 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE 4701 Highway 61 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 § 6 0 3. 13 0 TRAFFIC RE G U LAT I OHS § 6 0 3. 18 0 obstructing the passage of other vehicles, notwithstanding any traffic control signal to proceed, except that on a one -way street, drivers shall not be restricted to the use of the right half of the road, but may have access to the entire width thereof beyond the intersection, provided sufficient space be available. It shall be unlawful for the driver of any vehicle to drive across a sidewalk in entering a garage or parking lot unless there is sufficient space beyond the crosswalk in the garage or on the parking lot to accommodate the vehicle without obstructing the passage of other vehicles or pedestrians. (Ref. Ord. No. 439, 12/13/66) §603.140 PARKING ; BLOCKING ENTRIES No person shall park a vehicle or permit it to stand whether attended or unattended upon a highway in front of or within ten (10 feet on either side of the entrance to any depot, theater, hotel, club or other building designated by official no- parking signs: or within fifteen ( feet on either side of the rear entrance to any theater, except when taking on or discharging freight or passengers, and then only for such length of time as is reasonably necessary for such purpose, At theaters, hotels, clubs, depots or public gatherings, or under unusual cir- cumstances, vehicles must move or park as directed 'by Police Of- ficers or Police orders. (Ref. Ord. No, 439, 12/13/66) §603.150 PARKING: TRANSFER OF GOODS RESTRICTED No person shall transfer goods, wares or merchandise from one (1) vehicle to an- other while on any arterial highway: provided, that this section shall not be construed to apply where the vehicle from which the transfer is being made is incapable of being moved by its own pow- er. (Ref. Ord. No. 439, 12/13/66) §603.160 PARKING ; MOVING PARKED VEHICLES No person shall move a vehicle not owned by such person into any prohibited area or away from a curb such distance as is unlawful. (Ref. Ord. No. 439, 12/13/66) §603.170 PARKING ; TRUCK PARKING RESTRICTED IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS No motor vehicle over one (1) ton capacity or over twelve thousand (12,000) pounds gross vehicle weight, whichever is less, and no commercially licensed trailer shall be parked or stored in a plat- ted residential district except when loading, unloading or render- ing a service. (Ref. §408,,050, Code 1966; Ord. No. 456 4/9/68; 838, 06/11/91) §603o180 PARKING ; OTHER PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS Off-street and on- street parking in residential areas for periods over six (6) hours shall be limited to the residents of those homes and their guests unless otherwise regulated by other codes and ordinances. Moreover, except for short -term parking of six (6) hours or less,- the number of vehicles parked on or in front WONLA 76 24 Amended 06/11/91 27 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE 4701 Highway 61 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 S603 .180 TRAF.F I C .REGULATIONS 5603 �jNT r� of a residential lot shall not exceed the numbe of persons residin g on the premises and having automobile drivers licenses. (Ref. §408.060, Code 1966; Ord. No. 456, 4/9/68) §603.190 PARKING; PRESUMPTION IN REFERENCE mO ILLEGAL PkRKILvG ,, In an prosecution charging a violation o any law or regulation y ' standing or parking of a vehicle, proof hat the governing the g p g particular vehicle described in L the complaint was parked in violation of any such law or regulation, together with proof that the defendant named in the complaint was at the time of such parkin g the registered owner of such vehicle, shall constitute in evidence a prima facie presumption that the registered owner f:= ��•`_:�;� of such vehicle was the P erson who parked or placed such veh icle at the point where, and for the time during which, such violat Po ion' occurred (Ref. Ord. No. 561 5/14/74) §603.200 PXPKING; TAXI PARKIENG No taxicab shall be permi ..ted to stand on any public street or alley except on taxicab stands which shall be designated and plainly marked by the Police Department, and the parking of any vehicle not a taxicab, on such designated stands is hereby prohibited; except, that whenever a taxicab is on a designated cab stand and blocks the delivery entrance to any building, the drivers of such taxicabs shall make an opening to the curb so as to permit a commercial vehicle to load or unload. The driver of any taxicab occupying a designated stand must remain on the drivers seat at all times, except when necessary to open or close the door of his taxicab, to assist a passenger to enter or leave or to answer his call signal. No taxicab shall stand for a period longer than one-half (1/2) hour; at the end of such time the taxicab heading the line sha 1 1 move off the stand and the remaining taxicabs will then move forrward . No person shall solicit passengers for a taxicab upon the streets and highways of the City, except the driver of a taxicab when sitting upon the drivers seat of his vehicle, but the fact that such taxicab displays a device to indicate that such vehicle is not engaged shall not be considered as sol ici ring patronage* Nothing in the foregoing provision of this section, however, shall prohibit the driver of any taxicab from parking in a legal parking space or at a parking meter, provided tine proper payment is made therefore for reasonable periods of t ..me during which said driver is taking his :teals or is on an errand of personal business. During such periods, however, solicitatior. of patronage by said drivers is expressly prohibited. (Ref. Crd . No. 439, 12/13/66) " rtv, 25 28 F'EB, -19' 99 (FRI ) 14 : 15 lilJG�4F.� v� � c J `T"L( 4:5 ZONING Attachment 6 P. 003 § 2T -247 (d) All lots or ioarce?s shall have direct adequate physical access for emergency vehicles along the frontage of the lot or parcel from either an ex sting dedicated public roadway or an am-sting private roadway approved by the city council, (e) Access drives for platted residential lots shall be restricted to local residential streets as darned M' the transportation plan, unless no alternative access is avails a . bla, to be te mined by staff. (f) Access drives in platted areas of the R4 zoning district shall be constructed of co c- ate or a plant rime b "tuminous surface. * (g) Areas designed for temporary storage of vehicles may be constructed of class 5 gravel. (Code 10 0 07MI; Ord. No. 1548 § 1548.01, 5 -9 -90) See. 24 FIxterior storage. (a) In residential districts, all ruaterials azd equipment shall be stored within a. building or be fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties, except from the following in good order: (1) Laundry drying and recreational equipment, construction and landscaping materia and equipment currently being used on the premises, agricultural a of ment and � p materials, if these are used or intended for use on the premises. (?) Off street parking of passenger auto=obiles and pickup tracks. (3) Firewood, (b) Existing uses shall comply with this .section by October 14, 1971. (c) In all districts, the City racy require a. special use permit for any exterior storage if it's demonstrated that such storage is a hazard to the public health and safety or has a depreci- ating efTect upon nearby property values, or impairs scenic views, or constitutes a nuisance. (Code 1 . 0 85, § 401.0 7 (te) Sec. 24 Truck parldng in resideutial areas. No motor vehicle over three - quarter ton capacity, maxirnujn eight thousand (8,000) Nunds GVW, and no commercial trailer shall be parked or stored in a platted residential district or a public street except where loading, unloading, or rendering a service. This section does not apply to recreation vehicles and pickup trucks. Mode 1085, § 40 1.470(5 )) Sec, 24 -247. Other parbung in residential areas. Parking in residential areas (ofd street and on-street) shall be limited to the use of the residents of those homes_ Except for short -term parking (eight (8) hours or less) for guest parking, the number of vehicles parked on or in front of a residential lot shell not exceed double the number of persons residing on the premises and havin g an autotnoQile driver's license. (Code 1085, § 401.0706)) U&pp.-No, 5 26 29 FEB. -19' 99 (FR I ) 1 4 ;15 § 24 , .248 WOODBURY CI'T'Y COLE Sec. 24-8. Ncreational equipment in residential areas. In the R -.2 and R4. residential districts recreational equipment up to twenty -four (24) feet in lend may be parked or stored outdoors as follows: (1) One (1) p1ece of recreational equipment per dweEing unit. when recreational equip- ment is on a trailer, the trodler and ,piece of recreational equipment shall be consid- ered as one (1). (2) On any rear or side lot not within five (5) feet of the lot line in an established driveway of a lot. (3) In an established driveway in the front lot not within fiufteen (15) feet of the curb. (Code 1985, § 401.0?M(7); Ord. INTO. 1555, § 155 5.01 1 8- 22 .90) Sec. 24 -249. Agricultural operations. (a) All farms, an existence upon _kpri314, 1071, or the date of a subsequent a=endment to this chapter, within the c:ty sh4l be a. permitted use where the operator rnay conduct a f armin g operation. However, all regulations contained in this article V standards shall a 1 Y PP to all changes of the farming operation which will cause all or pert of the ar* ea. to become more intensively used or wore urban in character. The Minnesota State Building Cod shalt not apply to agmicultural buildings excapt with respect to state inspections required or rulernakin g authorized. The city council may require any farm operator to sevarre a special use ps: mit to expand or intensify the operations in the event of the following: (1) The faun is adjacent to, or within four hundred (400) feet of any dwelling unit and may �e detrim to living conditions by crating safety hazards or by emitting noise, odor, vibrations or similar nuisances_ () The faring operations ire so intens as to constitute an industrial type of use consisting of the compounding, processing, and packaging of products for wholesale or retail trade. (b) Any building in which farm animals are kept shall be a distance of two hundred (200) feet or more from any other occupied lot. The city counc may order the owner of any animals to apply for a special use permit if it is deemed to be in the interest of the ublic health safe y or general wel fare. ?Ton- domestic animals shall not be permitted on parcels of less than five (0) acres in area. The keeping of more than one (1) non- domestic farm animal per acre shall require a special use permiT.. Mode 1985, § 401.077) See. 24.250. Horne oocupa.txon, Parldng and storage of commercial equipment and vehicles, (a) Interim special use permit generally. In reviewing an apnli=tion for an interims specie l use permit for home occupation, parking and storage of commercial equip and vehicles, the city count shall consider the advice and recommendations of the . P pl and zoning corn=ssxon and the effect of the proposed use upon the health, saie conven and genera q�IP No, b 1554 27 P. 002 30 Attachment 7 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner and Robert Wenger, Environmental Health Officer SUBJECT: Residential Parking Concerns DATE: August 26, 1999 INTRODUCTION The city council directed staff to investigate parking in residential areas and provide information about properties that the city has received complaints about recently. DISCUSSION The following list includes eight owner - Occupied residential properties that staff have received complaints in 1999 about the parking of vehicles or the number of vehicles. Many of these sites had a large number of vehicles, some of which staff found to not be in operating condition or they did not have a current license. Some of these properties will not now appear to be a problem because of enforcement actions taken by staff. Property Action 1941 Adolphus Ticketed 776 Bartelmy Lane Orders 1389 Kohiman Ticketed 984 Lakewood Drive Ticketed 2043 Lydia Orders 2625 Maryland Avenue Complaints 1818 Myrtle Street Orders 1149 Ripley Avenue Orders p:ordlrespark.mem W 31 Attachment 8 ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE ABOUT OFF - STREET PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: SECTION 1. This section revises Section 19 -29 as follows: (I have underlined the additions.) Sec.19 -29. Violation. Abandoned motor vehicles and vehicles that are unlicensed or in an inoperable condition are prohibited in Maplewood. Any person who abandons a motor vehicle or leaves a vehicle in inoperable condition in the city or on any public or. private property is guilty of a misdemeanor. SECTION 2. This section adds the following definition to Section 36 -6 of the Maplewood City Code. Vehicle: A device for carrying or conveying persons or property that may be self - propelled or may be propelled, drawn or towed by a self - propelled vehicle. SECTION 3. This section adds Subsection 36 -220) to the city code as follows: Section 36 -22(i) Purpose The purpose of this Article of the City Code is to control, through zoning regulations, certain land uses and activities that have a direct and detrimental effect on the character of the City's residential neiqhborhoods. As such, the Maplewood City Council finds that, in order to accommodate the off - street parking needs of residents while protectin th e interests of the public, regulations and performance standards are desirable and necessary for off - street parking areas in residential zoning districts. Findings To the purposes listed above, the Maplewood City Council finds that the use and t possession of vehicles are an important factor in the lives of many residents of Maplewood. The city council also finds that the number.of vehicles, the improper storage of vehicles and the parking of and storage of excessive numbers of vehicles can affect the neighborhood character as well as the public health, safety and welfare, property values and the reasonable use and enjoyment of neighborinq properties. The city council further finds that the establishment of these regulations further the qoals in the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan relative the establishment and enhancement of residential neiqhborhoods and similar _goals.. In making these findings, the City Council accepts the recommendations of city staff and planning commission that have studied the experiences of other suburban cities that have reviewed and regulated off - street parking_ in residential areas. The Maplewood City Council establishes these requlations as a means to balance the interests of the owners of vehicles, nearby residents and the public 29 32 Goals Goals in adoptinq this ordinance include the following: a. Preserving neighborhood character, public health, safety and welfare and property values. b. Allowinq all residents a reasonable use and enjoyment of their property. C. Minimizing the adverse effects of off - street parking through careful site design standards. d. Requiring the owners and builders of residential driveways and parking areas to design and build them to reasonable standards. e. Avoiding potential damage to adiacent properties from off - street vehicle parking and parking areas throuqh design standards and setback requirements. 4) Off - Street Parkinq Standards for Single and Two Family Dwellings. The following standards shall appiv to off - street parking for properties less than one (1) acre in size in the RE -30, RE -20, F, R -1, R -1(S) and R -2 zoning districts. a. Vehicle parking in the front yards of residential areas shall only. be on a hard surface driveway or on improved and designated parkin areas. b. The city prohibits vehicle parking or storage in the front yard on grass, unimproved areas or areas without a hard surface that are not intended for a vehicle. C. All driveways and parkinq areas shall have an improved surface of bituminous, concrete, brick or another hard surface approved by staff. As of (date) , the city will not allow the installation of driveways with gravel or Class V for a finished surface. d. Driveways and parking areas shall be at least five feet from a side property line and at least ten feet from a street -side property line. e. No owner or operator shall park a vehicle that would block a sidewalk. f. The total area in the front yard of a single dwelling lot improved for parking and driveway purposes shall not exceed forty (40) percent of the front yard area The total area in the front yard of a duplex or double dwellinq lot improved for parking and driveway purposes shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the front yard area. All vehicles parked or stored outside on a residential property shall have a current license and registration and shall be in operable condition. (Also see Sec 19 -29, Violation. 30 33 h. T he city ma y approve an increase in front yard drivewav coveraae or for a different drivewav surface for a residential property y 15 -day review as outlined in Section 25 -65 of the city code. The. city may approve an increase in front yard driveway coverage or for a different driveway surface where such approval would meet the standards required by code for unique circumstances where the above ordinance standards do not fit .or would create a hardship for the property owner. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect after the City Council approves it and the official newspaper publishes it. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 1999. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes- Nays- 31 34 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA APRIL 5, 1999 IV. Unfinished Business A. Residential Parking Ordinance Ken Roberts summarized the discussion on this proposed ordinance from the previous commission meeting. As part of this staff report, he outlined, as he had noted, the main planning commission interests if the city were to pursue this ordinance. Commissioner Frost said he took a walking survey of his neighborhood and noted that there be many residences affected by this ordinance. He wondered if it would be better to "try to do a little bit at a time." .He suggested addressing one of the major issues now and see how it goes for a year. Then, if enforcement was not effective, it could be reconsidered in a year. Mr. Roberts agreed that "baby steps" would be the way to start this ordinance. He said the choice on how to do this will be up to the city council. Mr. Frost said the big issue he saw was people not parking on improved surfaces. He felt this problem has become worse over the years. Mr. Frost's main goal would be to require parking vehicles on an improved surface, in a garage, screened in the backyard or stored off the premises. Commissioner Rossbach preferred sending this to the city council now. The council could then let the commission know what is acceptable in the council's point of view. Commissioner Pearson thought a good starting point was to require bituminous driveways with new construction. Mr. Roberts said an improved driveway could be a good Class 5 driveway that is well maintained. Commissioner Trippler concurred with Mr. Rossbach about needing to get input from the city council at this time. Commissioner Ledvina suggested using a survey to ask Maplewood residents for their opinions. Commissioner Thompson commented that some of the screening that exists is almost more objectionable than that which is being concealed. He thought, with the screening requirement, that an ordinance was being initiated that would be almost unenforceable. Chairperson Fischer agreed that screening does pose some problems when defining how or from whom you are screening the vehicle. Commissioner Mueller said that passing an ordinance may generate new hard feelings but it does provide a law that will give people a recourse. He also was in favor of taking the planning commission list of issues and priorities to the city council for their decision. Commissioner Frost said that everyone he talked to about this ordinance thought it was a good idea. Commissioner Thompson advocated using a survey in the Maplewood in Motion to create awareness and get response from Maplewood residents. Commissioner Trippler was interested in the survey idea but cautioned that a survey does involve a great deal of work. He thought it might be a better way to just have the council meeting open for public comment and make a decision on this basis. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission forward the list of eight items contained in the staff report of March 16, 1999 on the proposed residential parking ordinance to the Maplewood City Council for their input and direction. Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes all The motion passed. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MARCH 15, 1999 V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Residential Parking Ordinance Ken Roberts presented the staff report. Additional sample ordinances, as previously requested by the commission, were included in the report. Mr. Roberts said the Stillwater ordinance was not available. Chairperson Fischer asked if the city council gave any direction as to what the ordinance should cover. Melinda Coleman, director of community development, responded that this came about because a couple citizens requested that the city council take a look at this problem within the city. She said the council gave no specific direction but she personally sensed they preferred something "more simplistic than complex on the scale of ordinances." Ms. Coleman felt the major issue was the front yard. She said council had a concern about taking on more than staff could enforce. Staff confirmed that Maplewood does not presently require a new home to have a garage or paved driveway. Commissioner Rossbach wondered if motor vehicle, trailer, etc. were included in the definition of vehicle. According to Ms. Coleman, vehicle would have to be clearly defined in the ordinance. Mr. Rossbach mentioned that, at the last meeting, the general suggestion was that each member of the commission would note the items they thought were important in dealing with this issue. He said it was previously discussed to take a "two -prong attack" write an ordinance that would only allow parking in the driveway in the front yard or address the issue of parking in both the side and backyard too. Commissioner Rossbach felt that items listed in the three approaches given in the staff report covered areas that he thought needed to be addressed. Some of his concerns were to clearly define vehicle, clearly define the parking area but not dictate that it must be concrete or asphalt (use hard surface or gravel), and screen any storage of these items in rear or side yards with 100 percent screening. Mr. Rossbach also thought it was important that the license plate be current. Mr. Rossbach was of the opinion that screening was more important than distance from a lot line. Commissioner Pearson mentioned that requiring an improved surface for storage or parking of a vehicle was discussed at the previous planning commission meeting. Commissioner Frost asked about the regulations and definition of commercial vehicles. He noted that there was a residence in his neighborhood that had three vans used for commercial purposes parking in the driveway and the street, in addition to the cars used by the residents. Mr. Frost also mentioned a neighbor who has six people in the house and each person has at least one vehicle. Commissioner Mueller commented that a blue tarp should probably not be allowed as screening. He also mentioned a very large recreational vehicle that is parked further down his street throughout the winter. Mr. Mueller said this is not a pleasant view and, therefore, he would like to have some regulations on the kind or size of recreational vehicle that can be parked in the residential area. Commissioner Rossbach thought that. setting up an ordinance that addresses a vehicle which is not in the driveway and is completely screened would limit the size of the vehicle. If the recreational vehicle is parked in the driveway, this ordinance would not affect that. He mentioned a recreational vehicle and large snowmobile trailer in his neighborhood that are parked on a paved surface and would not be affected as such. Chairperson Fischer described an instance in her neighborhood where a camper sat near the property line between a driveway and a lilac hedge and was hidden from street view by a large Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 03 -15 -99 pine tree. This screening was effective and presented -no problem to the neighbors. Commissioner Ledvina felt that enforcing setback requirements would eliminate storage of very large recreational vehicles in front of garages, etc. Commissioner Trippler basically agreed with Mr. Rossbach and also spoke about limiting the amount of driveway allowable in a front yard. He proposed that the total area of a front yard of a single lot improved for parking and driveway purposes should not exceed 30 percent of the front yard area. Additionally, he recommended that the average width of the driveway should not be more than 25 feet wide. Mr. Roberts said the driveway code was changed by the city council within the last couple years. He thought this change increased the driveway width at the right -of -way line from 22 feet to 32 feet. Mr. Trippler was agreeable to the 32 feet. Chairperson Fischer pointed out that the city has encouraged houses on major streets to have turnarounds. She felt the turnaround might create a problem on some of the existing minimal setbacks on lots that are narrower within the city. .Commissioner Mueller would rather see a paved front yard than ruts in grass. Commissioner Rossbach thought neither a paved yard or ruts in the grass were good choices. He thought green space (grass) was necessary to absorb runoff and not have it all go to the street. Commissioner Rossbach suggested saying "something like your driveway can't be bigger than the front of your garage." He was of the opinion that something could be set up in the ordinance that would limit how big the paved area could get without allowing the whole front yard to be paved. Mr. Rossbach felt the lots would lend themselves to what could be put on them. Chairperson Fischer suggested that paved and improved were not necessarily the same thing and described the difference. If the city is only going to allow a certain percentage of the front yard to be paved, Ms. Fischer felt an improved surface that is not impervious might have to be excluded. She thought this would also solve some of the runoff problem. Commissioner Pearson said this would be difficult to enforce. Commissioner Rossbach said this "sounded like sound reasoning." Commissioner Frost referred to the St. Louis Park ordinance and said it made sense that a recreation vehicle over eight feet high, twenty -two feet long and 6,500 lbs. should not be parked in a residential lot. He also did not feel that these should be parked in a driveway but should be stored in a storage lot. Mr. Roberts said they are usually kept at the residence for security reasons. Commissioner Thompson mentioned vehicles that have the wheels removed. These would be inoperable and not allowed. He also did not like the idea of vehicles being stored in back lots and felt it would be difficult to screen them effectively. Mr. Thompson was of the opinion that regulating backyard storage would lead to violations that would almost be unenforceable. Commissioner Rossbach believed that it would be adequate if the vehicle in the backyard was screened from the side and rear neighbors. He pointed out that the ordinance is not to deal with individual cases but would be a way for the city to resolve the many complaints it receives about storage of various vehicles. Commissioner Pearson did not think it should be so difficult to come up with a reasonable ordinance since there were other communities that have had suitable ordinances in effect for some time. Mr. Roberts indicated that St. Louis Park had expressed some difficulty in enforcing its ordinance. Melinda Coleman, director of community development, said this was a very unpopular ordinance and many people are still outraged by it. She preferred that Maplewood take a "more simpler" approach and start out by trying a conservative ordinance to begin with. Ms. Coleman said that weight and size restrictions irritate the residents. She thought it was best to address the front yard parking problem and, if allowing storage in the backyard, require screening. Ms. Coleman advised that a public participation process should be considered before writing a more complex ordinance. Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 03-15-99 Commissioner Pearson thought some of the excess -ive parking is the result of operating a business in a residential zone. He mentioned that many times vehicles parked in the street overnight are not being ticketed. Commissioner Mueller summarized the various aspects of the proposed. ordinance and commented that he liked the size restriction on recreational vehicles. His opinion was that if you could afford the vehicle, you probably could afford a place to store it. Commissioner Ledvina liked the fact that St. Louis Park identified a purpose for their ordinance. He also was in agreement with one sample ordinance that required a parking setback of five feet from the curb. He thought this could be extended to ten feet. Chairperson Fischer cautioned that this might be a problem in some older sections of Maplewood that have smaller setbacks. Melinda Coleman felt the ordinance should include some type of "escape clause" so that the city council or planning commission could allow a conditional use permit for extenuating circumstances. Commissioner Rossbach suggested reading the list of concerns and having the commissioners indicate their agreement by raising their hand. Commissioner Trippler noticed the restriction on outdoor storage of fish houses on residential lots in one of the sample ordinances. He was in favor of this because he had to look at a neighbor's fish house for four years. Staff indicated that Maplewood has not received complaints on these houses. Commissioner Thompson has observed a trailer full of trash and a diesel tractor frequently parked near Mr. Mueller's house. He felt the neighbors were either afraid or reluctant to complain and so the problem continues. Commissioner Rossbach saw this as a "relief valve" where the neighbors might not care and the city primarily responds on a complaint basis. Chairperson Fischer hoped that an ordinance would solve more problems than it creates. Commissioner Thompson requested that, after all the thoughts were compiled, the commission would have an opportunity to look at the ordinance from the point of view that each person possesses. He felt there was substantial difference in the backyard storage viewpoints. Chairperson Fischer recalled a previous instance where the HRA asked for specific direction from the city council on a truth -in- housing ordinance. She suggested that the commission might also want this same type of guidance from the council on this ordinance. Commissioner Rossbach understood that the planning commission was to put together a list of concerns they felt should be addressed in an ordinance. This would be taken to the city council for their review and then staff would write an ordinance based on the direction of the council. Mr. Roberts urged that, if the ordinance is written, time be allotted to advertise and invite the public to a planning commission or city council meeting to discuss the provisions of it. Commissioner Frost questioned the response to a White Bear Lake ordinance that prohibits the parking of motor vehicles, recreational equipment and vehicles in the front yard. Ms. Coleman hadn't heard if this was an issue in White Bear but said it is not that "atypical" to not allow any parking in front of the house other than in the driveway. Mr. Frost said it was very simple to keep it out of the front yard and then screen it on the side and back yard. Chairperson Fischer requested that, if an ordinance limits the amount of impervious surface, it should include an "escape hatch" for narrower lots so families with more vehicles could meet the intent of the code. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission table the residential parking ordinance to allow staff to prepare a summary. Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes— all MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 1, 1999 C. Residential Parking Ordinance Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. He said the area that was of concern was the number and location of vehicles parking in yards. Mr. Robert's mentioned the instance where a sailboat was parked in the front yard of a home in October and covered with a large blue tarp for the winter. He said Maplewood has no ordinance rohibitin this. Another p g case is where a family has more operable and licensed cars than room to park them so they use the front lawn. Mr. Robert's offered some possible approaches to the problem. Commissioner Rossbach commented that his driveway was dirt and, therefore, he was a little concerned about that part of the proposed ordinance that said he could not park on somethin that wasn't dust -free. Chairperson Fischer asked the commission to keep in mind the looks of many Maplewood neighborhoods when establishing parking criteria. Mr. Robert's said that, as this ordinance is currently drafted, only front yard parking 9 is being considered. Commissioner Seeber felt.parking cars in the backyards was also an issue. He cited a case in his neighborhood. He felt this ordinance was important and merited consideration. Commissioner Trippler questioned what "an area intended for parking" included. Mr. Roberts used a landscaped area as an example of a space which was not intended for parking. The commissioners discussed the definition of driveway. Commissioner Rossbach asked about the requirement that houses on collector streets have a turnaround area. Mr. Roberts suggested that existing turnarounds could be grandfathered in but a requirement made that new or improved turnarounds be up to current standards, i.e. hard - surfaced. Commissioner Mueller was surprised that, in observing parking throughout the city, there aren't more regulations about what can be parked in front yards and for how long. Chairperson Fischer mentioned that there is no overnight street parking in Maplewood. Commissioner Thompson felt that parking a motorhome in a driveway in front of a house destroys the setback ordinance. He said attitudes change as people have older children who drive cars and need space to park them at home. Mr. Thompson felt there has to be a limit somewhere to maintain the quality of a neighborhood. He just asked that whatever is decided, the ordinance should be enforceable. Commissioner Mueller mentioned other cities where motorhomes and snowmobiles must be parked in places other than front driveways. He suggested a- "happy medium." Chairperson erson p Fischer talked about the difference between landscaping and parking area. She said garage size is not as restrictive as it once was. She questioned whether it is better to have more g reen Planning Commission Minutes of 02 -01 -99 area or more impervious surface. Ms. Fischer was "very reluctant to say you couldn't be driving over rock or things of that nature" and used a previous personal circumstance to explain her position. Commissioner Seeber wanted to be very careful about the use of gravel because it spreads out into the yards and streets. Ken Roberts said most of the parking complaints are on vehicles. He thought that about ninety percent of the junked vehicles that are reported to the city are either not worth licensing or are moved to storage in a garage. Commissioner Rossbach felt there could be a potential problem with vehicles parked in the side and backyard. He wondered if the ordinance should be expanded to call for some type of screening if the vehicle is to be parked to the side or back of the home. Mr. Rossbach thought it might be a good time to address whether Maplewood should allow parking of large motorhomes on residential lots. He suggested differentiating between the parking of "toys" and transportation. Commissioner Rossbach said the commission possibly needed to define a driveway and even set some limits as to how big a driveway could be. He felt he would have a difficult time restricting parking of vehicles that are necessary for daily life, but not recreational vehicles. He also did not want conditional use permit requests to allow other parking. Commissioner Mueller thought another issue was the meaning of parking, whether overnight or for an extended period of time. Commissioner Pearson suggested an ordinance addressing a hard - surface driveway for new construction that covered size and allocation. He did not see a problem or hardship with this ordinance as it pertained to front yards. Ms. Fischer cautioned that not all homes have room to get a vehicle into their backyard or space to park on the side. Mr. Mueller thought if a vehicle is to be parked in the front, it should be on a hard- surfaced parking spot, not just put on the front yard. Commissioner Rossbach commented that it was basically the neighbors who disliked looking at the car parked in the yard as the homeowner obviously was not bothered by it. Ken Roberts said this was simply referred to the commission by the city council for input and no change was mandated. Chairperson Fischer asked staff to get actual figures on how many parking complaints are made to the city. Mr. Roberts stated that the only time a complaint would be logged is if there is an actual violation. If someone was calling to get information on parking restrictions, they would only be given that information but the call would not be documented. Ms. Fischer said she would also be reluctant to see yard "cemented in for a temporary situation." Commissioner Trippler asked for the actual language included in the ordinances used by Stillwater and Woodbury. Commissioner Rossbach said his thought was to recommend to the city council that they take no action with this. However, if the council does take action, he suggested the ordinance be complete and include parking only on designated areas and no storage of recreational vehicles, boats, etc. unless they are fully screened from the neighbors. Mr. Rossbach thought the ordinance could define a driveway and address the whole yard. Commissioner Mueller was interested in how other cities write their ordinance and he would like to see some of these. Mr. Roberts cautioned that many of the cities do not allow parking in the back which differed from Mr. Rossbach's suggestions. Commissioner Pearson "tended to agree" with Mr. Rossbach but thought this should be tabled until an ordinance that addressed the entire lot and size of the lot was developed. He felt some lots should be allowed storage under certain conditions. Mr. Pearson said he would like to see how the ordinances from Oakdale, White Bear Lake and Woodbury are written. He liked some of the ordinances that were simply written and stated nothing ahead of the front -yard setback. He thought this could also be extended to the rear of the house setback to take care of Planning Commission Minutes of 02 -01 -99 s y ide ards. Commissioner Pearson thought the potential was to see more and more front yard parking for various reasons. Commissioner Ledvina said he would support development of this type of ordinance. He felt this i becoming more of an issue because people have more possessions. s g Commissioner Rossbach asked if the consensus was in favor of designing an ordinance that would improve perception of the neighborhood. 9 i hborhood. He thought people could be allowed to store things along as screened and a minimum distance from property line. He also suggested they could be properly some r g on regulation parking large motorhomes. Some of the commissioners agreed with Mr. P 9 9 Rossbach. commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission table the residential parking ordinance for further information until the next planning commission meeting. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 1999 V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Residential Parking Ordinance Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Staffs opinion is that the city council initially did not want to address recreational vehicle parking and storage. They were more concerned with parking daily -use vehicles. Another consideration of the council was the enforcement of an ordinance. Commissioner Pearson saw no problem with allowing a homeowner to put crushed rock down to store a vehicle in the backyard. He said he would rather see this type of surface than grass growing up around a parked vehicle. Commissioner Ledvina liked portion of the St. Louis Park ordinance that referred to the rights of landowners and neighbors and how it all relates. Commissioner Rossbach thought the commission should look at an ordinance that "would improve the curb appeal of driving through Maplewood instead of having a bunch of cars parked on the front yard." He also felt an ordinance should address more than just vehicle parking. Mr. Rossbach did not advocate storing everything in the backyard so that neighbors would have to view it there. After touring parts of Maplewood, Mr. Rossbach came up with a list that he felt were important considerations if there was to be an ordinance. Some of these items were that the vehicles parked at a residence should be licensed and owned by people who lived in the home, screening of vehicles stored in a sideyard was more important than being a certain distance from the property line, parking, if not in a driveway, should not be allowed in front of the front setback, there should be an improved parking area for vehicles and maybe give some consideration to a size limitation on stored vehicles. It was his opinion that Maplewood should not have an ordinance that restricts a resident from having the number of cars that he needs. Mr. Roberts said that a problem with tieing the number of vehicles to the number of drivers is the instance where a resident collects cars. He might have three or four cars and only two drivers in the house. Commissioner Rossbach indicated he was not referring to cars stored in a garage. Commissioner Pearson spoke of an instance where a business is operating in a residential area and has vehicles parked in the front yard. He said this is either a zoning violation, or a provision should be made to "make the area better looking." Mr. Pearson also mentioned collector streets where the front yard is becoming a used -car lot for vehicles not owned by the property owner. He preferred to give careful consideration when dealing "with people's right to the private use of their property" but felt Maplewood was "way behind other communities in addressing some kind of a standard and it is beginning to show." Commissioner Ledvina referred to a portion of the St. Louis Park ordinance that restricted the total area of the front yard of a single family lot for improvement for parking and driveway to under 30 percent. He felt this provision was appropriate and should be included. Commissioner Rossbach noted that there are many driveways in Maplewood that would not qualify for a maximum width of 22 feet. Commissioner Pearson empathized with homeowners along busy collector streets that need additional space for a paved turnaround on their lot. Ken Roberts said our driveway code now allows a maximum of 30- or 32 -feet wide for three -car garages. Also, the city tries to require a turnaround in the front yard of new homes on collector Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 02 -17 -99 streets. Commissioner Trippler said he was encouraged by the discussions in regard to planning an ordinance. He thought the St. Louis Park ordinance was rather lengthy and "might not be easily understood by the general population." Mr. Trippler felt it was important that Maplewood have some kind of ordinance to control the overabundance of recreational vehicles in residential yards. He was primarily concerned with recreational ,vehicles. Mr. Roberts suggested the commission develop a list of concerns that need to be addressed and present this to the city council for their input. He also thought a. couple public meetings would be beneficial to get ideas from the residents. Commissioner Pearson pointed out that it would be prudent to include definitions of what is owned, what is licensed, etc. to make the ordinance clear. Commissioner Trippler felt the two basic questions were whether the ordinance should deal with just cars or all vehicles parked on a property, and should the focus be on the front yard issue or the whole lot. Mr. Roberts said he thought the council wanted 'to know the main points that the planning commission would like to see accomplished or changed with an ordinance amendment. Commissioner Rossbach suggested that the planning commission give recommendations to the city council. One recommendation, he thought of, was to not allow parking in the front yard and screen anything that is parked somewhere else on the lot. The other recommendation, if it was decided that further regulation was needed, would be to define the items. that need to be included in the ordinance. Mr. Roberts proposed that the commissioners go through the ordinance samples included in the agenda report and reach a consensus on the portions that should be included. He would then put together an ordinance for consideration. Commissioner Trippler requested copies of the Stillwater and Woodbury ordinances. Mr. Roberts said he would ,try to get these ordinances. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission table the item relating to residential parking issues and code changes until the next planning commission meeting to allow further study by the commission. Commissioner Trippler seconded. Ayes --all The motion passed. AGENDA REPORT T0: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer AGENDA ITEM 2_ Action by Council Date Endo Modified Rejected SUBJECT: Project 99 -13, Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Street Improvements— Accept Feasibility Study and Call for Public Hearing DATE: : February 7, 2000 Staff has held two neighborhood meetings with the residents of the Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood. The city council ordered the preparation of the feasibility study at the December 13, 1999, city council meeting. A feasibility study has now been completed. Copies of the feasibility study have been included as a supplement to the council agenda packet. If the city council agrees with the findings of the feasibility study, the next step in the public improvement process would be to accept the feasibility study and call for a public hearing. The public hearing would be scheduled for 7 p.m., February 28, 2000. Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution accepting the feasibility study and ordering the public improvement for the Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Street Improvements, Project 99 -13. CIVIC jt Attachment RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted December 13, 1999, a report has been prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of Bartelmy Lane, Mary Street, Sterling Street and Magnolia Avenue, North of Stillwater Road, City Project 99 -13, by Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, and this report was received by the council on February 28, 2000, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $578,000. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 28 day of February, 2000, in the council chambers of city hall at 7:00 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Agenda K 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: February 7, 2000 RE: Personal Service -Hours of Operation ntro-d Salon Nostalgia, owned and operated by Robert Moore is located at 1690 North McKnight Road. Mr. Moore has a Personal Service Business Premise license for this location and has requested permission to conduct business on Sunday's. City Code Section 24 -133 Closing Hours states: No premises licensed under this chapter shall be open between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. of the following day, and no business shall be opened on Sunday. In his request, Mr. Moore has suggested that the City grant an exception to the hours of operation or change the ordinance. Since the ordinance is so clear regarding opening hours, the Council would have to direct staff to rewrite the ordinance. For your consideration, attached is the listed of current Personal Service business license holders and the letter from Mr. Moore. Personal Service Premise Business Name dba Address Phone License ID The ABC's of Design, Inc. Salon Nostalgia Family Grooming Cent 1690 McKnight Road Maplewood MN 55109 651 - 770 -01 00 -PP -002 Shear Emphasis, Inc. Nail Makers 3000 White Bear Avenue Maplewood MN 55109 777 -0020 99 -PP -003 Elizabeth Arden Salons, Inc. Elizabeth Arden Salons, Inc. 3001 White Bear Avenue Maplewood MN 55109 773 -6840 00 -PP -003 Infinite Health Healing Centers Infinite Health Healing Centers 2515 White Bear Avenue Maplewood MN 55109 777 -4411 99 -PP -002 Sister Rosalind Gefre Prof. Message Ctr Sister Rosalind Gefre Professional Mes 2100 White Bear Avenue Maplewood MN 55109 698 -9123 00 -PP -001 Personal Touch Therapeutic Massage Personal Touch Therapeutic Massage 705 Century Avenue North Maplewood MN 55119 735 -7744 99 -PP -005 MEMO AGENDA ITEM K L f To: Michael A. McGuire From: Joel Hewitt, Fire Chief Subject: Fire Station Brick Purchase Date: February 14, 2000 BACKGROUND: AGENDA REPORT "on by council D Modified Rejected On Thursday, February 10, 2000, we met with our architect and construction manager on several issues regarding our fire station project. One result of this meeting was the discovery that exterior brick takes four to five months for delivery. The tentative construction schedule has the need for exterior brick in June or July. Our need is to place an order for brick now to insure timely delivery to the site to prevent a delay in construction, in turn delaying the completion. We want to move in prior to winter's arrival. Our architect has solicited three bids Friday for exterior brick as follows. All quotes include Minnesota State Sales Tax and delivery to our site for the quantity of 23,000 bricks. Ochsbrick Company Monterey Matte $1,000 per 1,000 = $24,495 Minnesota Brick &Tile Boron Brick $ P & M Brick $ RECOMMENDATION 750 per 1,000 = $1 8,371 822 per 1,000 = $20,134 To insure prompt construction of the new fire station, it is recommended to the Council to approve the purchase of 23,000 Monterey Matte Bricks from Ochsbrick Company at $1,000 per 1,000 for a total of $24,495. The reason we are not recommending the lowest bid is because we feel that it is very important that the outside exterior matches the design of the old railroad station that once was in that location. Ochsbrick Company is the only vendor that cones- close to the design and color necessary for that look. COUNCIL ACTION I request the Council to approve the above reconumendatiQn aid auttiarize the City Man4gq to procure the purchase of exterior Monterey Matte from the Ochsbrick Eopapany. c: City Clerk FEB-11-00 FRI 15:57 OCHS BRICK COMPANY FAX .No, 612 903 0250 P201/01 ............ sun. '' : ...... ....... ......... .......... ................ QUOTATION TWIN CITY ALES OIFVICJ� ,'S Post- . if� fo-"-ax Nlr,+Le 7671 1: o # of b , 717:5 Catill Roa4 - jj. JP MN 55430 T Fron 12) 903-0300 6r a�-Tv To I - Phone # 2225 ?*fvYjn' Rana N0011 L..... 1 -7 o - X. 1 9 g Furth St, Paul, MN 55109 it FLU # Phone; (01) 770- 790 Fax: (651) 770-0684 0Fk- PLANT P.Q. Box I W-504-301910, MN 56087 DATEf- FOrua i., M P-66nc; (507) 723-4221 Fax: ( 7 .� 342 -j 3 r t'O JOB: LOCA'rION: ARCRiTECT: SEH Arcbiiects to q uote You Prices all matcrials based on the followiri =rmnilm q uantit y , Wdi and delivar rt9 48 70 ( )[ ) L-13-M IMIM N ()(JA 7I' I' FO JOM JJ PRODUCT V11 311u factWer, iWam nuinbc1r, color, S' izo F-0-18- JORSITE o CONTR. UNLOADS Interstate -VI Onferle Matte UdLit Pice Brick 4%-4%12 $11,000.001M ALL PkICES. ARE 19LTWEC TC ) Ali y srrATE, crry AN-TD101Z USE TAX APPLICABLE AT TI'ME OF SALFS This Is iz i1ol item NO "TURNS, 0 All special m,&+nzt materials must be, paid whether shipped 0 , r not Terms are Net 30 da 0"0taj6'jn s"bject f0 accePtance within 3# da Affifilional char for par fial truckloads- Disposal char fur materials pic u p aijobsite $260- OMoad Re �r-t4;711 c t, L rA -'10' TIONT IN 10VIADE SUDIEC"I" TO TILE TE OF SALE. Ochs Brl'ck Compan v BY Rick Nichols 02/11/00 FRI 16:21 FAX 651 490 2150 SEH v so i r L r r i L_ .ice_+. t -rev W.& dW v v v� � if r M& r..I L 11 ✓X% & �r�ti W. A A A.a. QUOTATION MINNEsoTA BRICK & TILE Division Of Sioux City Brick & Tile Cornpany 520 Wept 86th Street Bloomingtoh, Minnesota 56420 Telephohe (612) SPQ238 FAX (612) 888 -0077 Quote No. Date ^" Job ❑ 4013 FIQt Bed —No! Unloaded— Addre88 I!C LInlQaded Town SPECIAL CONDITIONS: VIA Termsv.' ..� r J 2002 rV vv1 This office, and the writer in particulEir, would like to thank you In — adveince for any consideration regarding this quolatlen, If I person ally can be of f unher asslstanda, please do not hesitate to Doll. By MOM Dug to ohan Inp Conditions, it is in1 P osmlbi■ tv quote prices for any extended time. On material of our own manufacture, prices as quoted are usrantood if accepted within 90 days. On Material being quoted on plants of other than our ovrh rrmnyf acture, whicb we do not control, rice$ will p b e those in effe ©t at time of release, Unless otherwise agreed in writing. T H19 QUOTATION IS GOOD FOR THE MATERI ORIGINALLY SAMPL FOR THIS JOB, IF FOR SOME REASON THIS SAMPLE IS NOT ACCEPTAIBLE AND NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED, Tf iEN WE WILL NEED TO REAUOTE, BASED ON SUhsEUUj;NT SAMPLES. This quotation shall only be c onsiderad an oftr to evll and is not a contract until accepted by the SiOuk City Brick $ The Company at its office in Sioux City, IA. u p o n AN aontraut based u n this proposal shall be govemed by the conditions as st ®Zed on the reverse Side. PRICE