HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 01-24 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, January 24, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -02
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL -CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting 00 -01 (January 10, 2000)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted
by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the
Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. City Manager Resignation Agreement
3. New Century Final Plat (New Century Boulevard, North of Highwood Avenue)
4. Personal Service License - Individual -Ann G. Mayer
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. Hazelwood Street Improvements, Project 99 -07 (4- votes)
2. 7:10 P.M. Rosoto Senior Housing (Desoto Street and Roselawn Avenue)
1. Land Use Plan Change (R -1 to RH) (4- votes)
2. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Planned Unit Development (PUD)
3. Parking Reduction Authorization
I. AWARD OF BIDS
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Code Amendment - Liquor Licenses (Second Reading)
2. Code Amendment - Zoning Change - Section 36 -6 (Second Reading)
K. NEW,BUSINESS
1. Harvester Area Streets, Project 98 -10, Change Orders 1, 2 & 3, Final Payment
2. Harvester Area Streets, Project 98 -10, Landscaping Project Budget
3. Spring Clean -Up Day
4. HRC Request for Money to Sponsor Mixed Blood Performances
5. Senior Chemical Dependency Program Request for Charitable Gambling
6. Resolution Supporting Ramsey /Washington Counties Suburban Cable Communications Commission
to Oppose State Legislation to Eliminate Franchising Authority
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
O. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL i
7:00 P.M. Monday, January 10, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -01
A. CALL TO ORDER:
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal
Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
C. ROLL CALL:
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 99 -28 (December 27,1999) as
presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Allenspach and Koppen
E. OATH OF OFFICE
Kenneth V. Collins and Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmembers, were sworn in by City Clerk Karen Guilfiole.
F. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Mayor Cardinal motioned to move to Visitor Presentations to the beginning of the meeting.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
G. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS:
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and announced that Abby Wells- Herzog and
1
Philip Sherwood have withdrawn their applications for three -year terms on the Human
Relations Commission.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS (moved by vote for tonights meeting)
1. Kathy Juenemann, 721 Mount Vernon Avenue, congratulated the new City Council.
H. CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Consent Agenda Items H 1 thru H -8 and H 10 as presented and
pull the Consent Agenda Item H-9 for a separate vote.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
135,519.69 Checks #47629 thru #47735 dated 12 -28 -99
105,447.55 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 12 -21 thru 12 -27 -99
40 Checks #8184 thru #8194 dated 12 -17 thru 12 -30 -99
280,110.04 Checks #47738 thru #47832 dated 01 -04 -00
72,839.72 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 12 -28 thru 12 -31 -99
634,804.82 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROL
305352.67 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 12 -23 -99
22,812. Payroll Deduction check #76030 thru #76036 dated 12-23-99
327,964.73 Total Payroll
962,769.55 GRAND TOTAL
2. Squad Car Purchase
Approved the purchase of replacement vehicles.
2
3. 2000 Animal Control Services Contract
Approved the 2000 Animal Control Service Contract with Animal Control Services, Inc.
4. Joint Powers Agreement Between City of Oakdale and City of Maplewood Regarding the Operation of
Skyview Pool and Tanners Beach
Authorized City Manager and Mayor to enter into the Joint Powers Agreement between the City of
Oakdale and the City of Maplewood regarding the operation of Skyview Pool and Tanners Beach f6r the
calendar year 2000.
5. Park and Recreation Commission Appointments
Approved appointment of Donald Christianson, Audrey Duellman and Rick Brandon to three -year terms on the
Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission.
6. Resolution of Appreciation for Clayton Qualley
Adopted the following Resolution:
00 -01 -001
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Clayton Qualley has been a member of the Maplewood Police Civil Service Commission
since February 1985 and has served faithfully in that capacity; and
WHEREAS, the Police Civil Service Commission has appreciated his experience, insight and good
judgement; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Qualley has freely given of his time and energy, without compensation, for the
betterment of the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Qualley has shown dedication to his duties and has consistently contributed his
leadership and effort for the benefit of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its
citizens that Clayton Qualley is hereby extended our heartfelt gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated
service. We wish him continued success in the future.
7. Intoxicating Liquor License - Change of Manager - Keller Golf Clubhouse
Approved change of manager - liquor license application for Patricia M. Belde to be used at Keller Clubhouse,
2166 Maplewood Drive.
3
8. Intoxicating Liquor License Annual Renewals - On Sale
Adopted the following Resolution:
00 -01 -002
RESOLUTION
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY,
MINNESOTA, that the following On -Sale Liquor Licenses, having been previously duly issued by this Council,
are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 2000, with approval granted herein subject to
satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and health Inspections:
Robert James Selander Colleen Danford
AMF Maplewood Lanes Ciatti's Italian Restaurant
1955 English Street 1900 E. County Road D
Kimberly Joy Macynski Paul J. Mateyka, Jr.
Applebee's Deans, Inc.
2112 Maplewood Mall 1986 Rice Street
3 001 White Bear Avenue
Raymond R. Emerfoll
Eugene A. Beaulieu Garrity's
Beau's Food & Spirits 1696 White Bear Avenue
2289 E. Minnehaha
Michael Gengler
Stephen Yantes Gulden's
Bleechers 2999 N. Highway 61
2220 White Bear Avenue
Patricia Belde
Ronald Ringling Keller Clubhouse
Best Western - Maplewood Inn 2166 Maplewood Drive
1730 E. County Road D
Stephen Parr
Tom McDonough Outback Steakhouse
Chalet Lounge 1770 Beam Avenue
1820 Rice Street
Gerry Walton
Judith Landreville Red Lobster
Champp's 2925 White Bear Avenue
1734 Adolphus
Gregory Kuhns
Dale Naasz Smiley's D.G. Burger
Chi -Chi's Restaurants 2425 Highway 61
3069 White Bear Ave
Cheri Ottem
Steve Shirvinski Stargate Bar & Danceclub
Chili's Restaurants 1700 Rice Street
Southlawn & Beam
Suzanne Schilling
Suzanne's Cuisine
2100 White Bear Avenue
Brian Meyer
The Bird
3035 White Bear Avenue
Thomas Hecker
The Olive Garden
1749 Beam Avenue
Peter Cappelletti
The Rock
2029 Woodlyn Avenue
Club On -Sale
Harlan Johnson
Loyal Order of Moose 963
1946 English Street
Wine On -Sale
B albir Singh
Taste of India
1745 Cope Avenue
Kin Phing Lee
Singapore Chinese Cuisine
1715-A Beam Avenue
10. Temporary Liquor License - Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary
El
Approved the application for a temporary liquor license for Kathleen Yzermans, Church of the Presentation of
the Blessed Virgin Mary, for 2 -12 -2000, and waived the standard procedure of being named as certificate holder
on the insurance policy and accepted the City as being additionally insured for the requested dates.
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the Consent Agenda Item H9 as presented.
9. Intoxicating Liquor License Annual Renewals - Off Sale
Adopted the following Resolution:
00 -01 -003
RESOLUTION
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RA.MSEY COUNTY,
MINNESOTA, that the following Off -Sale Liquor Licenses, having been previously duly issued by this Council,
are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 2000, with approvals granted herein subject to
satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and health inspections:
Todd Norman
A -1 Liquor, Inc.
19 North Century Avenue
Arthur Mark Stein
Laber's Liquors
1700 D Rice Street
Wendy Lauber
Maplewood Wine Cellar
1281 Frost Avenue
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Joseph Hurdy
M. G.M. Liquors Warehouse
2950 White Bear Avenue
Marvin C. Koppen
Party Time Liquor
1835 E. Larpenteur Ave.
Christopher Sarrack
S arrack's International Wine & Spirits
2305 Stillwater Road
Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Allenspach, Collins and Wasiluk
Abstain - Councilmember Koppen
1. 7:00 P.M. Tilsen Neighborhoods Streets, Project 99 -05
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
c. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings.
5
d. Assistant City Engineer Cavett presented the specifics of the report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents of opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Don Ladmire, 3010 North Chippewa Court
Dale Coocher, 3002 Lakewood Drive
Bunny Brueggeman, 3038 North Lakewood Drive
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption:
00 -01 -004
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 27th day of December, 1999, fixed a date for a
council hearing on the proposed street improvements of the Tilsen North Neighborhood Streets (Bartelmy Lane
North, Brenner Avenue North, Brenwood Curve, Chippewa Court North, Lakewood Drive North, and Meyer
Court North), City Project 99' -05,
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and
the hearing was duly held on January 10, 2000, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the
matter and has fully considered the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA,
as follows:
1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of
Maplewood make improvements on Tilsen North Neighborhood Streets, City Project 99-05.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the 27th day of
December, 1999.
3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final
plans and specifications for the making of said improvement.
4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the
financing plan for the project. A project budget of $239,500 shall be established. The proposed financing plans
is as follows:
Assessments
City contribution
Total
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach
130,200
109,300
239,500
Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Collins,
Koppen and Wasiluk
3i
Nays - Mayor Cardinal
2. 7:20 P.M. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Code
Amendment - Woodland Hills Church (1740 Van Dyke Street and 1847 Larpenteur
Avenue)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Matt Ledvina presented the Planning Commission Report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents of opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Greg Boyd, Woodland Hills Church Senior Pastor, Vadnais Heights, MN
Presented Woodland Hills Church Proposal
Bob Cutshall, Woodland Hills Church Building Committee Chair, Eden Prairie, MN
Presented Woodland Hills Church Proposal
William Holmgren, 934 East County Road C, tender of Woodland Hills Church
Amy Watson, 1020 Bartemy Lane
Leslie J. Lane, 1707 Stanich Place
Charles Fenrick, 2449 Elkhart Lane
Peggy Clark, 2140 Duluth Place
Ed Frickson, 64 Farrell Street
Bill Adams, 1126 Lealand Road
Trinh Tranb erg, 1018 Dennis Street South
Huyen Tranberg, 1018 Dennis Street South
Mary Anderson, 2023 Clark Street
Jay and Gail Swenson, 1780 McMenemy
Debbie Dean, 2231 McAfee Circle
Kevin Halweg, 2234 McAfee Circle
Jeff Carter, 1754 Edgerton Street
Dan and Cheryl Wuerch, 816 Belmont Lane
Eileen Okeefe, 2325 East Maryland Avenue
David Endrizzi, 2253 Kenwood Court
Dave Libra, 120 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, MN, Attorney for Property Owners
Karl Yeager, 4206 Multifoods Two, Minneapolis, Law Firm representing Kinart
Dick Pearson, 1109 Crestview Dr., Hudson, WI, owner - Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park
Chuck Repke, 1961 Sherwood, District 2 Community Council
Joe Flemming, 5040 Lake Elmo Avenue, Lake Elmo, MN
Gary Unger, 1847 East Idaho Avenue, St. Paul, MN
Mike Cerney, 1941 Larpenteur Avenue
Jeanne Ewald, 1744 Ruth Street
Ben Fagerlie, 504 Skillman Avenue East
7
Patrick Wiggin, 504 Skillman Avenue East
Greg Boyd, Woodland Hills Church Senior Pastor (Second Appearance)
Kathy Juenemann, 721 Mount Vernon
Shay Packanen, 1749 East County Road C
Leslie Lane, 1707 Stanich Place (Second Appearance)
Greg Sole, Attorney for Woodland Hills Church (Second Appearance)
Dave Libra, 120 South 6t11 Street, Minneapolis, MN, Attorney for Property Owners (Second
Appearance)
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Wasiluk introduced the following Land Use Plan Change Resolution and moved for its
adoption:
00 -01 -005
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Woodland Hills Church applied for a change to the city's land use plan from BC (Business
Commercial) to C (Church).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the properties located a 1740 Van Dyke Street and 1847 Larpenteur Avenue.
The legal description is:
Parcel I:
That parcel of land lying in the County of Ramsey and State of Minnesota, described as follows, to wit:
All that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of SW 1/4) of Section Fourteen (14),
Township Twenty -nine (29), Range Twenty -two (22), lying Southerly of the North St. Paul Road and lying
Southwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of SW 1/4);
thence West One Hundred Twenty (120) feet along the South line thereof to the place of beginning of the line herein
to be described; thence along a line bearing North Forty -seven (47) degrees, Twenty -two (22) minutes West to the
Southerly right -of -way line of the North St. Paul Road and there terminating.
Also:
That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (E' /2 of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4) of Section
Fourteen (14), Township Twenty -nine (29), Range Twenty -two (22), lying Southeasterly of North St. Paul Road
so- called); except that part of the South Two Hundred Thirty -three (233) feet lying East of the West One Hundred
Eighty -three (183) feet; and further excepting that part of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter (E %2 of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4), lying Northwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at a point on the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of SW 1/4),
One Hundred Ten (110) feet South of the Northeast corner thereof; thence running to a point on the North line of
said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of SW 1/4), One Hundred Twenty (120) feet West of the
Northeast corner thereof. Subject to public easements over the East Thirty -three (33) feet thereof for North Hazel
Street; the West Thirty -three (33) feet thereof for Van Dyke Street, and the South Thirty -three (33) feet of the West
One Hundred Eighty -three (18 3) feet thereof for Larpenteur Avenue; further subject to the rights of the County of
Ramsey for highway over That part of the West 183 feet of the South 233 feet of the East Half of the Southwest
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, State of
Minnesota (hereinafter to be referred to as Parcel X), enclosed within the area described as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of Parcel X; thence Northerly along the East line thereof, a distance of 62.42 feet;
thence Northwesterly to a point 70.38 feet West of the East line and 65.37 feet North of the South line of Parcel X;
thence West parallel to the South line of Parcel X, a distance of 40 feet; thence Northwesterly to a point 45 feet east
of the West line and 74 feet North of the South line of Parcel X; thence Northwesterly to a point on the East right -
of -way line of Van Dyke Street that is 102 feet North of the South line of said Parcel X; thence West parallel to the
South line of Parcel X, a distance of 33 feet to its intersection with the West line of Parcel X, thence South along the
West line, a distance of 102 feet, to the Southwest corner of Parcel X; thence East along the South line of 183 feet to
the place of beginning. Excepting therefrom such right -of -way heretofore dedicated to the public or otherwise
acquired for highways, all according to the United States Government Survey thereof. (PIN 14-29-22-33-0001)
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On December 20, 1999, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a
hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The
planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written
statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the land use plan
change.
2. On January 10, 2000, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports
and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described change for
the following reasons:
1. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's goals and policies.
2. It would protect and strengthen the neighborhood.
3. It would minimize conflict between land uses.
4. It would support the improvement, replacement or redevelopment of substandard or incompatible
development.
5. It is in the public interest to remove this property from the tax rolls since it would create a more
compatible situation with the adjacent residential community.
6. Approval is subject to the condition that a building permit for improvements relating to the use of
the property as a church shall be issued within on year of council approval, or this approval shall
become null and void and the city's land use plan for the property shall automatically revert to BC
business commercial). The council may extend this deadline for one year. Any interested person
may apply for an earlier change to the comprehensive plan.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on January 10, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Allenspach,
9
Collins and Wasiluk
Nays - Councilmember Koppen
Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Conditional Use Permit Resolution and moved for its
adoption
00 -01 -006
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Woodland Hills Church applied for a conditional use permit for a church.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to properties located at 1740 Van Dyke Street and 1847 Larpenteur
Avenue. The legal description is:
Parcel I:
That parcel of land lying in the County of Ramsey and State of Minnesota, described as follows, to wit:
All that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of SW 1/4) of Section Fourteen
14), Township Twenty -nine (29), Range Twenty -two (22), lying Southerly of the North St. Paul Road and
lying Southwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of SW
1/4); thence West One Hundred Twenty (120) feet along the South line thereof to the place of beginning of
the line herein to be described; thence along a line bearing North Forty -seven (47) degrees, Twenty -two
22) minutes West to the Southerly right -of -way line of the North St. Paul Road and there terminating.
Also:
That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (E %z of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4) of
Section Fourteen (14), Township Twenty -nine (29), Range Twenty -two (22), lying Southeasterly of North
St. Paul Road (so- called); except that part of the South Two Hundred Thirty -three (233) feet lying East of
the West One Hundred Eighty -three (183) feet; and further excepting that part of said East Half of the
Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (E' /2 of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4), lying Northwesterly of the
following described line:
Commencing at a point on the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of
SW 1/4), One Hundred Ten (I 10) feet South of the Northeast corner thereof; thence running to a point on
the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of SW 1/4), One Hundred
Twenty (120) feet West of the Northeast corner thereof. Subject to public easements over the East Thirty-
three (33) feet thereof for North Hazel Street; the West Thirty -three (33) feet thereof for Van Dyke Street,
and the South Thirty -three (33) feet of the West One Hundred Eighty -three (183) feet thereof for
Larpenteur Avenue; further subject to the rights of the County of Ramsey for highway over That part of the
West 183 feet of the South 233 feet of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 14, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, State of Minnesota (hereinafter to be
referred to as Parcel X), enclosed within the area described as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of Parcel X; thence Northerly along the East line thereof, a distance of
10
62.42 feet; thence Northwesterly to a point 70.38 feet West of the East line and 65.37 feet North of the
South line of Parcel X; thence west parallel to the South line of Parcel X, a distance of 40 feet; thence
Northwesterly to a point 45 feet east of the West line and 74 feet North of the South line of Parcel X;
thence Northwesterly to a point on the East right -of -way line of Van Dyke Street that is 102 feet North of
the South line of said Parcel X; thence West parallel to the South line of Parcel X, a distance of 33 feet to
its intersection with the West line of Parcel X, thence South along the West line, a distance of 102 feet, to
the Southwest corner of Parcel X; thence East along the South line of 183 feet to the place of beginning.
Excepting therefrom such right -of -way heretofore dedicated to the public or otherwise acquired for
highways, all according to the United States Government Survey thereof. (PIN 14-29-22-33-0001)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On December 20, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On January 10, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city
staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional
use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approves this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the
city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would
be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of
excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration,
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the
development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
11
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit
shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant shall do the following immediately with the Phase 1 improvements: overlay and
restripe the parking lot on the west side of the building, patch pot holes in the parking lot on the
remainder of the site, remove all litter, damaged items and debris, remove the wooden fence and
restore the grass.
S. The landscape plan shall be submitted to the community design review board for approval before
any landscaping is added.
6. Plans for any changes to the building exterior, other than painting or repairs, shall be submitted to
the community design review board for review and approval.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on January 10, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
Councilmember Collins introduced the following Ordinance (first reading) Amending the Regulations for On-
Sale and Off -Sale Liquor Licenses and moved for its adoption:
ORDINANCE NO. 807
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REGULATIONS
FOR ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances:
Section 1. This section adds Section 5 -38(d) as follows (additions are underlined):
Section 5-38,
c ) No "on- sale" license may be issued under this article for premises located within one hundred (100)
feet of a church or school building located in the city, and no "off- sale" license shall be issued for premises
located within one hundred (100) feet of a church or school building. The distance is to be measured from the
main entrance of the licensed premises to the nearest property line of said church or school.
d) Exemption: The 100 -foot spacing requirement noted in paragraph (c) above shall not apply if the on-
sale or off-sa liquor establishment is in operation e ore the influx of the church or school m the neighborhood
12
or if the existing establishment proposes to expand their facility.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper.
The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on January 10, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
J. AWARD OF BIDS
NONE
K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Deer Management Plan - Code Change - Second Reading
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Ordinance and moved its adoption:
ORDINANCE NO, 806
ARTICLE IV. WEAPONS AND EXPLOSIVES
Sec. 20 -77 Bows and arrows; aiming; discharging in public place; possession by minor under fourteen;
definition; etc.
a) Every person in the city who shall aim any bow and arrow, as defined in this section, at or toward any
human being, or who shall willfully discharge an arrow from a bow in any public place, or in anyplace where
there is any person to be endangered, although no injury actually results, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Addendum
Exemption: The City of Maplewood's Deer (wild life) Management Plan.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
L. NEW BUSINESS
1. 2000 City Council Appointments
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Collins requested a separate vote on the City Attorney and the Prosecuting Attorney.
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the City Attorney appointmen for a 3 -month trial basis.
13
Motion died for lack of a second.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the 2000 appointment for City Attorney as presented.
Appointment
City Attorney Patrick J. Kelly
Banigan & Kelly
Current rates:
80 /hr - civil
95 /hr - litigation
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Koppen and
Wasiluk
Nays - Mayor Cardinal and Councilmember Collins
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the Prosecuting Attorney appointment on a month to month basis.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the 2000 appointment for Prosecuting Attorney as presented.
Appointment
Prosecuting Attorney Song Lo Fawcett
Kathleen Loucks
Banigan &Kelly
Current rates:
4,750 /monthly retainer
500 /month cap on expenses
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Allenspach,
Koppen and Wasiluk
Nays - Councilmember Collins
Councilmember Koppen moved to pull the Ramsey /Washington Cable Commission for a separate vote and
appr all other 2000 appointments as presented.
Appointment
Municipal Legislative
Commission
Sherry Allenspach
Michael McGuire
14
Ramsey County League Sherry Allenspach
of Local Governments Kenneth Collins
N.E.S.T. Marvin Koppen
Julie Wasiluk
Suburban Rate Authority Marvin Koppen
Mike Ericson (alt)
St. Paul Water Utility Robert Cardinal
Board of Commissioners
Suburban Area Chamber Kenneth Collins
of Commerce Melinda Coleman(alt)
The Partnership Julie Wasiluk
Don Winger
Metro East Development Marvin Koppen
Partnership Melinda Coleman (alt)
Joint Ice Arena Board Kenneth Collins
Sherry Allenspach
Official Newspaper Maplewood Review
Acting Mayor Sherry Allenspach
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve 2000 Ramsey /Washington Suburban Cable Commission
Appointment as pre
Ramsey/Washington Robert Cardinal
Suburban Cable Commission Marvin Koppen (alt)
15
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Collins and
Koppen
Nays - Councilmembers Allenspach and Wasiluk
2. Recommendation for Zoning Code Change - Sec. 36 -6
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
b. Chief Winger presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the change in the Maplewood Code §36 -6, first reading) to remove
rabbits from the definition of ivestoc .
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes all
3. Project 99 -07, Hazelwood Street Improvements - Accept Feasibility Study and Call for Public
Hearing
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
b. Assistant City Engineer Cavett presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following Resolution accepting the feasibility study and
ordering the public improvement for the Hazelwood Street Improvements, Project 99-07:
00 -01 -007
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted November 22, 1999, a report has been prepared
by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of Hazelwood Street between Gervais
Avenue and County Road C, City Project 99 -07, by Hazelwood Street Improvements, and this report was
received by the council on January 10, 2000, and
WHEREAS, the report provides infonnation regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost -
effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the
assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,073,300.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 24th day of January, 2000, in the
council chambers of city hall at 7 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing nd
i
g
improvement as required by law.
0
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
4. Highway 36 Noise Exception
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to authorize a waiver in the noise ordinance so that MN /DOT can proceed with
mill and overlay work during nighttime hours etween p.m. an d 7:00 a.m. as proposed in their letter,
because the overall disruption totthe neighborhood would be less if the project proceeds as propose
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
NONE
N. ADMINISTR.A.TIVE PRESENTATIONS
NONE
O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Cardinal moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 P.M.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Karen E. Ginifoile , City Clerk
17
AGENDA NO. G -1
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director )QQZII
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
DATE: January 18, 2000
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
6,769.65 Checks #8195 thru #8197 dated 1 -4 thru 1 -6 -00
119,429.79 Checks #47835 thru #47941 dated 1 -11 -00
154,362.97 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 1 -4 thru 1 -10 -00
106,958.83 Checks #8198 thru #8205 dated 1 -7 thru 1 -12 -00
154,857.69 Checks #47944 thru #48058 dated 1 -18 -00
91,073.59 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 1 -11 thru 1 -18 -00
633,452.52 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROL.T .
309,660.13 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 1 -7 -00
23,516.06 Payroll Deduction check #76301 thru #76308 dated 1 -7 -00
333,176.19 Total Payroll
966,628.71 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions
on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if
necessary.
hu
Attachments
C:\OFFICE\WP
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1
01/07/00 12:04 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
8195 01/04/00 551500 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY WASTEWATER SEMINAR NORDQUIST 185.00 185.00
8196 01/04/00 890900 U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 372.53 372.53
8197 01/06/00 890905 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 313.15
TELEPHONE 83.87
TELEPHONE 437.76
TELEPHONE 118.22
TELEPHONE 108.80
TELEPHONE 1,853.40
TELEPHONE 53.65
TELEPHONE 543.89
TELEPHONE 495.61
TELEPHONE 110.14
TELEPHONE 55.07
TELEPHONE 55.07
TELEPHONE 55.07
TELEPHONE 55.07
TELEPHONE 101.23
TELEPHONE 55.15
TELEPHONE 161.21
TELEPHONE 89.46
TELEPHONE 55.15
TELEPHONE 130.84
TELEPHONE 631.36
TELEPHONE 648.95 6
47835 01/11/00 ROBERT CYBYSKE SWIM REFUND 32.00 32.00
47836 01/11/00 DISCOVERY CLUB GROUP REFUND 20.65 20.65
47837 01/11/00 STILLWATER ADVENTURE CLUB GROUP REFUND 295.00 295.00
47838 01/11/00 ASHLEY HORAN SWIM REFUND 150.00 150.00
47839 01/11/00 MELINDA COLEMAN SWIM REFUND 30.00 30.00
47840 01/11/00 MINNESOTA COMPREHENSIVE ASSOC.REFUND MN COMP. DUP. PMT.165.19 165.19
47841 01/11/00 ST. MARY'S MISSION HOUSE REFUND DUP. PMT.426.37 426.37
47842 01/11/00 010462 AT & T LONG DIST. BILLS 1.34
LONG DIST. BILLS 289.52
PERSONAL CALLS 40.51 331.37
47843 01/11/00 010467 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES TELEPHONE 54.17
TELEPHONE 19.48
TELEPHONE 103.68
TELEPHONE 23.04 200.37
47844 01/11/00 010575 ACE HARDWARE 6 PLUG STRIPS, EXT. CORDS 172.75
1
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2
01/07/00 12:04 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 220.91
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 384.18
CEMENT, NOZZLE, HOSE 41.47
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 328.27
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 196.89 1,344.47
47845 01/11/00 010610 ACOUSTICS ASSOCIATES, INC.SHEETROCK CEILING TILES 494.16 494.16
47846 01/11/00 020000 ADVANCED GRAPHICS SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 37.28
BLACK PRINT CART 74.55
RECYCLED INK JET 36.21 148.04
47847 01/11/00 020411 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE CELL CHARGES 30.97
CELL CHARGES 30.97
CELL CHARGES 30.97
TELEPHONE 404.55
TELEPHONE 5.86
CELL PHONES 44.45 547.77
47848 01/11/00 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MAT SERVICE 21.30
MAT SERVICE 37.88
MAT SERVICE 36.69 95.87
47849 01/11/00 030420 ANDERSON, EVERETT A MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 184 MI.51.52 51.52
47850 01/11/00 031905 AQUA LOGIC, INC.PULSAR BRIQUETTES,DPD POWDER,11092.80 1,092.80
47851 01/11/00 050675 AWARDS BY HAMMOND, INC.PLAQUES FOR CDRB 139.10 139.10
47852 01/11/00 061906 BAUER BUILT BATTERY 95.76
BATTERY 60.77 156.53
47853 01/11/00 080925 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS UTILITIES 25.40
UTILITIES 22.04 47.44
47854 01/11/00 081250 BRAD RAGAN INC.INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES 279.12
INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES 465.19 744.31
47855 01/11/00 110093 CO2 SERVICES POOL CHEMICALS 22.55
POOL CHEMICALS 45.95 68.50
47856 01/11/00 110152 CSI SOFTWARE JAN. SOFTWARE MAINT.267.00 267.00
47857 01/11/00 110215 CADALYST SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 59.95 59.95
47858 01/11/00 110470 CARLE, JEANETTE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 56 MI.15.68 15.68
47859 01/11/00 150190 COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONST. CO.REPAIR PUMP ALTERNATOR 143.75 143.75
47860 01/11/00 152400 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC.3 MO. SERV. AGREEMENT 285.00 285.00
2
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3
01/07/00 12:04 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
47861 01/11/00 170235 CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL, INC.GENERATOR SET 24,759.12 24,759.12
47862 01/11/00 170250 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS, INC.REPAIR TO CLOCKS ON R -1 43.75
REPAIR TO E4 & E2 298.88 342.63
47863 01/11/00 180231 DM STAMPS & SPECIALTIES NOTARY STAMPS 50.43 50.43
47864 01/11/00 180800 DALCO FUL TROL, BODY SHAMPOO, T.P.391.27
BLCH MFLD TOWEL 41.96
LYSOL 66.80
FUL TROL, MULTI FRESH, T.P.,509.38 1
47865 01/11/00 200530 DICTAPHONE CORPORATION MODEL 3742 TRANSCRIBER 468.60 468.60
47866 01/11/00 230220 EDI CO.LEXMARK FORMS PRINTER 349.32 349.32
47867 01/11/00 230286 EMR- ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR, INC MOTOR FOR OZONE MACHINE 185.72 185.72
47868 01/11/00 230960 ECOPRINT ENVELOPES 32.95 32.95
47869 01/11/00 231500 EDDY BROTHERS COMPANY, LLC REPAIRS AT STA 1 147.90 147.90
47870 01/11/00 260656 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES, IN FIRE HOSE, COUPLINGS 422.98
FIRE HOSE, COUPLINGS 422.98 845.96
47871 01/11/00 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 37.60
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 39.79
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 12.80
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 29.25
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 41.27
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 12.80
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 29.25
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 65.15
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 9.10
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 12.80
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 29.25
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 64.51
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 12.80
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 29.25
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 39.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 38.44
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 39.40
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 36.86
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 41.27
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 12.80
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 29.25
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 41.27
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 33.90
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 36.50
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 41.27
k3
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4
01/07/00 12:04 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 12.80
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 29.25
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 12.80
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 30.96
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 11.20
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 30.90
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 42.92
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 12.80
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 30.96
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 30.95
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 44.44
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 12.80
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 30.96
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 41.27
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 30.90
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 46.07
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 63.01
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 76.88
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 38.71
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 24.51 1
47872 01/11/00 320240 GRACE, DUANE FEES FOR SERVICE 1,766.00 1,766.00
47873 01/11/00 320250 GRAF, DAVE KARATE INSTRUCTION -DEC.126.00 126.00
47874 01/11/00 340110 HEJNY RENTALS, INC HEATERS 137.56 137.56
47875 01/11/00 350700 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT SUPPLIES 34.19 34.19
47876 01/11/00 350940 HOME DEPOT /GECF PAINT SUPPLIES 271.20 271.20
47877 01/11/00 370076 HUGHES & COSTELLO PROCESS SERV.,VICTIM /WITNESS,722.50 722.50
47878 01/11/00 370084 HURLEY, STEVE REFERENCE BOOK 13.29 13.29
47879 01/11/00 380200 ICMA SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 815.18 815.18
47880 01/11/00 380475 IPMA-MINNESOTA CHAPTER ADM LUNCHEON MTG. FOR S. LE 15.00 15.00
47881 01/11/00 390200 INFO DATA 1 BOX PRINTER RIBBONS 118.77 118.77
47882 01/11/00 400960 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY, INC.GLOVES 372.19 372.19
47883 01/11/00 410370 KATH COMPANIES BRAKE LINES 11.63 11.63
47884 01/11/00 430970 KRECH'S BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.REPAIR LASERJET, FUSER UNIT 193.63 193.63
47885 01/11/00 450491 LANIER WORLDWIDE EAR PIECE HEADSET, CUSHIONS 37.70 37.70
47886 01/11/00 460000 LE, SHERRIE L PLANNER FOR 2000 33.02 33.02
4
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5
01/07/00 12:04 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
47887 01/11/00 470720 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT, INC.NOSECLIPS,RACHET,FLOATS,WETPET 162.74 162.74
47888 01/11/00 500427 M.G.F.O.A.MGFOA DUES -DAN FAUST 30.00
MGFOA DUES - CAROLE ANDERSON 30.00
MGFOA DUES-GAYLE BAUMAN 30.00 90.00
47889 01/11/00 500430 M.E.M.A.MEMA MEMBERSHIPS -3 75.00 75.00
47890 01/11/00 500525 M.P.E.L.R.A.ANNUAL MEMB. DUES 150.00 150.00
47891 01/11/00 500681 M.S.S.A.SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 27.00 27.00
47892 01/11/00 501225 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT DIRT SHOE RUNNERS 1,171.50 1,171.50
47893 01/11/00 511600 MASYS CORP HDWE /SFTWE MAINT. JAN 2000 704.25 704.25
47894 01/11/00 530560 MERIT CHEVROLET TRANSMISSION REM.1,549.58
CORE RETURN 266.25 -
MIR-GLS/T 27.56
CAP, ROTOR, WIRE KIT 1,808.90
CREDIT - CORE RETURN 372.75 -
CREDIT 118.22-2
47895 01/11/00 530730 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY TETHER BALLS,HULA HOOPS,WAKLER 125.52 125.52
47896 01/11/00 530755 METROCALL PAGER 10.46
PAGER /RENTAL SERVICE 22.57 33.03
47897 01/11/00 530800 METRO EAST DEVELOPMENT PART.SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 500.00 500.00
47898 01/11/00 531660 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MONTHLY SAC -DEC. 99 18,900.00
MONTHLY SAC-DEC. 99 189.00-18,711.00
47899 01/11/00 540480 MIKE'S LP GAS & R.V. SERVICE 100# LP FILL TANKS ON LOAN 99.01 99.01
47900 01/11/00 540770 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGER 235.50 235.50
47901 01/11/00 540805 MINNEAPOLIS RAG STOCK CO.50 LB BOXES COTTON POLO.74.90 74.90
47902 01/11/00 541440 MINN. STATE TREASURER STAX MO. SURTAX -DEC. 99 1,494.79
MO. SURTAX-DEC. 99 29.90-1
47903 01/11/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO PHOTOS - DARE 22.97
FILM DEVELOPING 10.61 33.58
47904 01/11/00 550220 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC.2000 DUES -D. WINGER 150.00 150.00
47905 01/11/00 551500 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY CITY DUMP CLEANUP 22.50 22.50
47906 01/11/00 630770 NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EMT NAT'L REGISTRY CERTIFICATES -7 105.00 105.00
5
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6
01/07/00 12:04 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
47907 01/11/00 660500 NO. ST. PAUL MAPLEWOOD-OAKDALE 1ST QTR. DUES - 2000 140.00 140.00
47908 01/11/00 661600 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO.BUCKET STACKER 15.92 15.92
47909 01/11/00 681151 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN LABELER TAPE 49.94
POST -IT, NAME TAGS 14.88
RING BINDERS 31.84
BLACK INK CART., BATTERIES 38.32
LABELER TAPE 20.22
CREDIT 13.87 -
FAX CART., P -TOUCH TAPE 75.58 216.91
47910 01/11/00 690340 OLSON, ARNOLD G MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 235 MI.65.80 65.80
47911 01/11/00 691160 ON SITE SANITATION WKLY SERV., REG. UNIT, WAIVER 7.95
WKLY SERV., REG. UNIT, WAIVER 7.95 15.90
47912 01/11/00 712260 POOLSIDE PUMP PARTS 443.95 443.95
47913 01/11/00 740310 R.C.L.L.G.2000 MEMB. DUES 1,350.00 1
47914 01/11/00 741201 RAINBOW FOODS FOOD FOR Y2K WORKERS 60.86
FOOD FOR Y2K WORKERS 270.34 331.20
47915 01/11/00 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY - PRRREV NOV. COMPUTER USAGE 69
NOV. COMPUTER USAGE 1999 7.16
NOV. COMPUTER USAGE 1999 841.34 849.19
47916 01/11/00 742127 RAMSEY CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE 2000 DUES D. WINGER & M. RYAN 20.00 20.00
47917 01/11/00 742150 RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS & REC.SHOWMOBILE FOR JULY 4H 534.75 534.75
47918 01/11/00 742155 RAMSEY CTY PROPERTY RECORDS PROP. TAXES PROD. 97-16 80.66 80.66
47919 01/11/00 761313 ROCHESTER MIDLAND SANITIZER SERV. -MCC X 3 MO.79.56 79.56
47920 01/11/00 762200 RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC.CONCRETE,SAND & CEMENT,KOMATSU 1 1
47921 01/11/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.CREDIT 16.88 -
TOOK CREDIT TWICE 22.50
DESK REFILL, YRLY PLANNER 57.61
BACKORDERED ITEMS 29.83
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 106.12
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 14.95
APPT.BOOK,TAPE,FILM,SCISSORS 96.16
CREDIT-PD TOO MUCH 8.03-302.26
47922 01/11/00 780350 S.E.H.ARCVIEW 3.2 SOFTWARE 1,028.79 1,028.79
47923 01/11/00 820225 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO Y2K UPGRADE 450.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT 2,199.76 2
6
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 7
01/07/00 12:04 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
47924 01/11/00 840403 ST. PAUL, CITY OF WATER 37.06
HYDRANT RENTAL 191.70
REPAIR /MAINT PKWY SAN.LIFT STA 12
AGR 02 -7254 - SEWER MAINT.4,568.37
AGR 02 -8697 - SEWER MAINT.1,016.00 18,655.03
47925 01/11/00 850340 SUMMIT INSPECTIONS ELEC. INSPECTIONS 3,990.80
ELEC. INSPECTIONS 4
ELEC. INSPECTIONS 4 3
47926 01/11/00 850835 SWEET COMPUTER SERVICES SFTWE MAINT. 2/25/00-2/25/01 655.00 655.00
47927 01/11/00 851575 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 190.31
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 82.53
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 82.40 355.24
47928 01/11/00 860080 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC 98 -12 7
98 -12 6,506.69 14,057.09
47929 01/11/00 860632 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 85.00 85.00
47930 01/11/00 860650 TARGET STORES-CSA A/R GLUCOMETER TEST STRIPS, BATTER 103.48
XMAS CARDS, LIGHTS, CRAYONS 28.46 131.94
47931 01/11/00 860725 TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.PHONE SUPPORT 18.00 18.00
47932 01/11/00 880500 TUBBS SNOWSHOES 19 SNOWSHOE PAIRS 1
19 SNOWSHOE PAIRS 113.30-1,781.64
47933 01/11/00 880800 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG.COUPLER 46.55
GRAB HOOK 1/2 CLEVIS 28.48 75.03
47934 01/11/00 882830 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVE TOW E 4 150.00 150.00
47935 01/11/00 910535 VECTOR INTERNET SERVICES WEB DOMAIN SPACE HOSTING 24.00 24.00
47936 01/11/00 911350 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY WALL SWITCH PLATE COVERS 29.10 29.10
47937 01/11/00 911600 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER BRONCO GLOVES 39.60 39.60
47938 01/11/00 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P.COMM. PLBG. INSP.70.00
COMM. PLBG. INSP.87.50
COMM. PLBG. INSP.87.50-70.00
47939 01/11/00 931850 WARNING LITES OF MN CHIP SEAL WHITE 250.28
PERM BARRICADES 894.60 1,144.88
47940 01/11/00 931860 WASTE MANAGEMENT FEES FOR SERVICE 219.39 219.39
47941 01/11/00 941675 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES, INC.GREEN BAR PAPER 300.22
WHITE PAPER 111.95
GREEN BAR 60.05 472.22
7
TOTAL CHECKS 126,130.69
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pa ee Description Amount
01/03/00 01/04/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 769.75
01/03/00 01/04/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 19,057.56
01/03/00 01/04/00 CBSA Dental fees 1
01/04/00 01/05/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 903.50
01/04/00 01/05/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 19,021.00
01/05/00 01/06/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 695.25
01/05/00 01/06/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 15
01/06/00 01/07/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 718.75
01/06/00 01/07/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 13,057.85
01/07/00 01/10/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 503.00
01/07/00 01/10/00 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 14
01/07/00 01/10/00 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 68,036.01
TOTAL 154,362.97
c
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1
01/14/00 11:54 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
8198 01/07/00 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 2 2,179.00
8199 01/07/00 330680 HEALTHPARTNERS JAN PREMIUM 5
JAN PREMIUM 21,243.02
JAN PREMIUM 5,033.95 31,360.29
8200 01/07/00 530100 MEDICA CHOICE JAN MEDICA PREMIUM 4,728.54
JAN MEDICA PREMIUM 24,158.82
JAN MEDICA PREMIUM 4,335.57 33,222.93
8201 01/07/00 551100 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE JAN MN LIFE PREMIUM 325.10
JAN MN LIFE PREMIUM 1
JAN MN LIFE PREMIUM 938.41
JAN MN LIFE PREMIUM 46.84-2,419.37
8202 01/07/00 110870 CBSA JAN CBSA FEE 513.40
JAN CBSA FEE 283.50 796.90
8203 01/07/00 280200 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO.JAN FORTIS PREMIUM 2 2
8204 01/12/00 722200 P.E.R.A.1/7 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCT 15,314.78
1/7 PERA PAYROLL DEDUCT 19 34,728.04
8205 01/12/00 010765 ADMINISTRATION RESOURCES DEC ADMIN CHARGES 203.94 203.94
47944 01/18/00 LISA BRUECHERT REFUND TUMBLING 50.00 50.00
47945 01/18/00 JESSICA BENSON REFUND SWIM 40.00 40.00
47946 01/18/00 DOUG ARENDT REFUND RACQUETBALL 16.00 16.00
47947 01/18/00 JANE CHAO REFUND RACQUETBALL 30.00 30.00
47948 01/18/00 ROBERT KRENZ REFUND SWIMMING 80.00 80.00
47949 01/18/00 MICHELLE BRENNAN REFUND SWIMMING 40.00 40.00
47950 01/18/00 ST.PAUL ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTIO REFUND DUP. PMT. F23806 446.65 446.65
47951 01/18/00 LUNDSTROM #221 REFUND DUP. PMT. FALSE ALARM 100.00 100.00
47952 01/18/00 010800 ADT SECURITY SERVICES MONITOR FEE 3.72 3.72
47953 01/18/00 020405 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL OXYGEN CYL.RENT., MED. OXYGEN 420.67 420.67
47954 01/18/00 020411 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE CELL PHONE 43.59
CELL PHONE BILLS 21.32
PHONE SERVICE 28.85
SQUAD CELL PHONES 297.79 391.55
47955 01/18/00 020870 ALLIED MEDICAL ACCTS CONTROL AMOUNT DUE FOR PRE COLLECT 36.00 36.00
10
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2
01/14/00 11:54 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
47956 01/18/00 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.PATROL RATE, BOARDING FEES 1 1
47957 01/18/00 042503 ASSOCIATION OF METRO 2000 MEMB. DUES 7 7,514.00
47958 01/18/00 050600 AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS, INC.REPLACE WINDSHIELD SQD 946 260.07 260.07
47959 01/18/00 061050 BANICK, JOHN TUITION REIMB., BOOKS 417.02 417.02
47960 01/18/00 061608 BARR ENGINEERING CO.OCT.30- NOV.26 INV. 23/62-55 610.00 610.00
47961 01/18/00 070210 BECKER, RONALD BACKGROUND INVEST. -10 a 44HRS,1 1
47962 01/18/00 074000 BLUEBIRD RECOVERY PROGRAM SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 8.00 8.00
47963 01/18/00 090570 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD PLANNING /DESIGN -99 -23 176.06 176.06
47964 01/18/00 090620 BREDEMUS HARDWARE LATCHES FOR D.L. DOOR 23.32 23.32
47965 01/18/00 091304 BRUCE NELSON PLBG. & HTG.REFUND DUP PLBG. PERMIT 990228 50
REFUND DUP PLBG. PERMIT 990228 95.00 95.50
47966 01/18/00 110150 C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES FEES FOR SERVICE 50.00 50.00
47967 01/18/00 110488 CARLSON WAGONLIT TRAVEL AIRFARE S.LE TO NPELRA CONF.210.00 210.00
47968 01/18/00 151330 COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES INC.PARTS WASHER,55GAL DRUM FILTER 120.20 120.20
47969 01/1.8/00 152500 CORNELL LABORATORY SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 35.00 35.00
47970 01/18/00 170900 D & D TOWING SERVICE INC.TOWN IMPOUND VEH.146.50 146.50
47971.01118/00 181852 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE DUPLICATE PMT 53.32 -
DUPLICATE PMT 20.00 -
MASTER #1 LOCKS 123.45 50.13
47972 01/18/00 200830 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN MEMB.DUES EAST PARKS LIONS 115.00 115.00
47973 01/18/00 230220 EDI CO.2 HP LASERJET 210OXI 713.55
2 HP LASERJET 210OXI 713.55 1
47974 01/18/00 230745 EAGAN, CITY OF TUG MAIN DUES FOR S. LE 24.00 24.00
47975 01/18/00 240150 ELSMORE AQUATIC SWIM CAPS, GOGGLES 211.57 211.57
47976 01/18/00 240380 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH, INC NEW SQD SETUP -ADD'L SQD -Y2K 4
INSTALL COMP.DOCKING STATION 714.87
REP.PUSHBUMPERS,HDLGHT,FLASHER 476.92 5
47977 01/18/00 250503 FBI.NAA NORTHWEST CHAPTER 2000 DUES-WINGER 60.00
2000 DUES - THOMALLA 60.00 120.00
11
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3
01/14/00 11:54 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
47978 01/18/00 260290 FARMER BROS. CO.DECAF 84.80
FLAVORED'COFFEE 78.00 162.80
47979 01/18/00 260656 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES, IN HOSE STRAP SYS.,LGTS- YELLOW 351.70 351.70
47980 01/18/00 300500 G K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 85.50
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 76.88
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 38.71
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 24.51 225.60
47981 01/18/00 301660 GENERATOR SPECIALTY CO., INC.ALT.REPAIR KIT, REGULATOR 213.63 213.63
47982 01/18/00 310710 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, INC.DEC. 99 SERVICE 19.25 19.25
47983 01/18/00 320265 GRAFIX SHOPPE STRIPES 942 151.41 151.41
47984 01/18/00 330676 HEALTHCOMP EVALUATION SERV.RANDOM DRUG TEST. FEES 150.00
RANDOM DRUG TEST. FEES 90.00
RANDOM DRUG TEST. FEES 30.00 270.00
47985 01/18/00 350700 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT SUPPLIES -D.L. CITY HALL 31.79
1
31.79
47986 01/18/00 370084 HURLEY, STEVE REF. BOOK 15.95 15.95
47987 01/18/00 370100 HUTCHINSON, ANN PROGRAM SUPPLIES 180.86
POSTAGE 5.28
FEES FOR SERVICE 6.38
BATTERIES 61.16
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 144.05 M 40.33 294.01
47988 01/18/00 380110 I.A.C.P.2000 DUES - WINGER 100.00 100.00
47989 01/18/00 380819 IOS CAPITAL COPIER LEASE 80%241.38
COPIER LEASE 20%60.35 301.73
47990 01/18/00 391395 INTOXIMETERS PBT MOUTHPIECES 42.60 42.60
47991 01/18/00 400600 JDV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MPLWD 95-02 123.53
95 -02 6.54
95 -15 1
95 -15 71.91
96 -09 890.53
96 -09 330.78-
96-18 15,740.49
96 -18 1 16
47992 01/18/00 400650 J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC.APPL. RECYCLING 78.00 78.00
47993 01/18/00 400950 JEANE THORNE TEMPORARY SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE 975.72 975.72
47994 01/18/00 401616 JOHNSON, KEVIN A.INVESTIGATOR CLOTHING 288.99 288.99
12
i
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4
01/14/00 11:54 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
47995 01/18/00 410370 KATH COMPANIES ARCTIC BLEND DIESEL 6
UL PLUS 89 OCTANE ETHENOL 6 13,347.39
47996 01/18/00 430350 KNOX (UMBER CO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 347.13 347.13
47997 01/18/00 430353 KOEHNEN, MARY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 80 MI.22.40 22.40
47998 01/18/00 500515 M.N.A. MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 80.00 80.00
47999 01/18/00 500651 M.R.P.A.VOLLEYBALL REG. -78 TEAMS @ $16 1
MRPA FALL CONF.545.00 1,793.00
48000 01/18/00 500681 M.S.S.A.SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 25.00 25.00
48001 01/18/00 501220 MACDONALD & MACK ARCHITECTS LT SERV. FOR DEC.99- BRUENTRUP FRM 1 1
48002 01/18/00 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BDAY CAKE 17.20
REG.ORDERS 12/1- 12/31/99 503.73
ELECTION JUDGE TRAIN 30.82 -
CREDIT - COOKIES 12.46-
CREDIT - COOKIES 123.79 -
BIRTHDAY CAKES 68.75
BIRTHDAY CAKES 82.50 505.11
48003 01/18/00 530200 MEIDLINGER'S, INC.TOP INSTALL. ON D.LIC. DOOR 40.00 40.00
48004 01/18/00 531400 METRO SALES INC.FEES FOR SERVICE 111.83 111.83
48005 01/18/00 540175 MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO.MDSE. FOR RESALE 152.60
MDSE. FOR RESALE 174.15
MDSE. FOR RESALE 370.35
MDSE. FOR RESALE 301.65
CREDIT- PD BY SUZANNE'S 44.00-954.75
48006 01/18/00 542200 3M SIGNAGE MATERIALS 2 2,643.50
48007 01/18/00 542325 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH FEES FOR SERVICE 64.00
FEES FOR SERVICE 194.50
FEES FOR SERVICE 287.50 546.00
48008 01/18/00 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO FILM DEVELOPING 3.67
FILM 19.44
FILM DEVELOPING 3.94
FILM DEVELOPING 11.48
DARE PHOTOS 13.40 51.93
48009 01/18/00 542435 MINNESOTA REC. & PARKS ASSOC.SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 551.00 551.00
48010 01/18/00 542455 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC DOC. DESTRUCTION 63.27 63.27
48 01/18/00 551350 MN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 20.00 20.00
13
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5
01/14/00 11:54 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
48012 01/18/00 630850 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 26.00 26.00
48013 01/18/00 640550 NELSON, JEAN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 176.4 MI 49.39 49.39
48014 01/18/00 640815 NEWPROS DATA, INC.LISTLABS 39.00 39.00
48015 01/18/00 660500 NO. ST. PAUL -MAPLEWOOD- OAKDALE SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 150.00 150.00
48016 01/18/00 661108 NORTH STAR WIPER & INDUSTRIAL PAPER PRODUCTS 311.63 311.63
48017 01/18/00 661755 NORTHERN STATES POWER MO. UTILITIES 43.65
MO. UTILITIES 7,270.81
MO. UTILITIES 4
MO. UTILITIES 12,132.61
MO. UTILITIES 289.58 -
MO. UTILITIES 371.19
MO. UTILITIES 1,318.40
MO. UTILITIES 317.68-24,948.52
48018 01/18/00 670950 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC PUBLISHING-MAPLEWOOD IN MOTION 1,881.04 1
48019 01118/00 700675 PAKOY,GENE MECHANICAL INSP.4
MECHANICAL INSP.6,098.77
MECHANICAL INSP.6 4
48020 01/18/00 700800 PAPER WAREHOUSE, INC.BALLOONS,NAPKINS,CUPS,PLATES,95.93 95.93
48021 01/18/00 711690 PIONEER PRESS PUBLISHING 38.18 38.18
48022 01/18/00 720595 POST BOARD LIC. FEE -OFF. C. CAMPBELL 90.00 90.00
48023 01/18/00 720600 POSTMASTER MAILING POSTCARDS 1 -18 883.50 883.50
48024 01/18/00 720771 PREMIER MECHANICAL REFUND PLBG. PERMIT 9901764 1,708.25
REFUND PLBG. PERMIT 9901764 66.33 1
48025 01/18/00 741201 RAINBOW FOODS FOOD- COUNCIL MEMB. WKSHP 1-3 42.21
HOT DOG BUNS 7.96 50.17
48026 01/18/00 742460 RANGER RICK SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 17.00 17.00
48027 01/18/00 750550 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS BULBS, STIR STICKS 434.02
CHIPS,CHEESE SAUCE,PRETZELS,210.46
CHIPS,NAPKINS,CHEESE SAUCE,626.76 1
48028 01/18/00 761310 ROBERTS, KEN FALL 99 TUITION & BOOKS 1,010.31 1
48029 01/18/00 762175 ROSEVILLE RADIO PAGER BATTERIES 124.60 124.60
48030 01/18/00 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.SUPPLIES - OFFICE 104.06
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 26.58
14
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6
01/14/00 11:54 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
BINDERS, LABELS 16.08
SUPPLIES - OFFICE 18.29
RETURN OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.21-143.80
48031 01/18/00 780600 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT SUMMER CAMP PRIZES, SUPPLIES 80.11
TWIX,LAYS,ANIMAL CRACKERS,65.79
DANCE SUPPLIES 129.68
PEANUTS,CHEETOS,ANIMAL CRACKER 285.42
CANDY BARS,SKITTLES,TWIZZLERS 89.48
KLEENEX,ZIPLOCK BAGS,DORITOS 166.03 816.51
48032 01/18/00 800075 SEARS SMALL TOOLS 135.22
TOOLS 233.12 368.34
48033 01/18/00 800182 SEMPLE EXCAVATING & TRUCKING BRUENTRUP FARM WORK-DEC. 1999 40,000.00 40
48034 01/18/00 800200 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION SLUC SEMINAR 30.00
REG. FOR COALITION MTG. 1 -19 30.00 60.00
48035 01/18/00 810620 SHORTREED, MICHAEL MEALS, PARKING - MEDIC SCHOOL 45.85 45.85
48036 01/18/00 820300 PROFESSIONAL.:MASSAGE CENTER ,, MASSAGE SERVICES 1 1
48037 01/18/00 830239 SOKKIA CREDIT CORPORATION SIXTH MO.RENTAL PMT.553.80 553.80
48038 01/18/00 831400 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC.60 SHORT SLEEVE GOLF SHIRTS 1 1
48039 01/18/00 842501 STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICITY INSP. CERT. BONDS 50.00 50.00
48040 01/18/00 850310 SUBURBAN CHAMBER SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 495.00 495.00
48041 01/18/00 850600 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC FUEL & OIL 18.75 18.75
48042 01/18/00 850685 SUZANNE'S CUISINE, INC.BOARDS /COMMISSIONS DINNER 911.25 911.25
48043 01/18/00 860410 TSE, INC.JANITORIAL SERVICES 637.20 637.20
48044 01/18/00 860630 TALIANO'S SUBS OCT. - DEC.152.50 152.50
48045 01/18/00 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA A/R BATTERIES,FOLDERS,BINDERS 100.24
POOL SUPPLIES, STICKERS,BLEACH 33.98
PHONE 53.24
ICE PACKS 3.99
ICE PACKS 4.21 195.66
48046 01/18/00 861616 THE ECOLOGIST SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 35.00 35.00
48047 01/18/00 861617 THE ECONOMICS PRESS, INC.SUBSCRIPTION 118.69 118.69
48048 01/18/00 861659 THE INSTITUTE FOR FORENSIC PSYCH EXAM - CAMPBELL 325.00 325.00
15
VOUCHRE2
01/14/00 11:54
VOUCHER/
ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
48049 01/18/00 861900 THURSTIN, JIM
48050 01/18/00 862710 TIME WARNER CABLE
48051 01/18/00 880501 TREADWAY GRAPHICS
48052 01/18/00 880675 TROPHIES UNLIMITED
48053 01/18/00 890910 US WEST DEX
48054 01/18/00 900175 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
48055 01/18/00 900180 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
48056 01/18/00 910500 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL
48057 01/18/00 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P.
48058 01/18/00 970800 YOUNGREN, JAMES
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 7
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT
WAGES TO CHECK OUT FALSE ALARM 47.12 47.12
SERVICE 1/15- 2/14/00 106.17 106.17
PENNANTS, PINS, MEDALLION,245.58 245.58
TROPHIES 149.80 149.80
PUBLISHING 103.40 103.40
PERMIT 4903 RENEWAL FEE 100.00 100.00
POSTAGE-REPLENISH METER 3 3
TRASH REMOVAL 336.92
TRASH REMOVAL 7 242.35
TRASH REMOVAL 537.94 1,117.21
COMM. PLBG. INSPECTIONS 620.00
COMM. PLBG. INSPECTIONS 775.00
COMM. PLBG. INSPECTIONS 775.00-620.00
4 HRS COURT TESTIMONY 109.16 109.16
TOTAL CHECKS 261
16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checkin account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pa ee Description Amount
01/10/00 01/11/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 712.50
01/10/00 01/11/00 MN State Treasurer Deput Re #149 17,660.41
01/10/00 01/11/00 MN State Treasurer State Pa Tax 129923.73
01/10/00 01/11/00 CBSA Dental fees 557.58
01/11/00 01/12/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 758.25
01/11/00 01/12/00 IVIN State Treasurer Deput Re #149 24,146.38
01/07/00 01/12/00 Elan Financial Services Purchasin card items 11489.26
011.12/00 01/13/00 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 877.00
01/12/00 01/13/00 IVIN State Treasurer Deput Re #149 10,792.38
01/13/00 01/14/00 IVIN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 535.25
01/13/00 01/14/00 IVIN State Treasurer'Deput Re #149 71891.90
01/10/00 01/14/00 MN De-pt of Revenue IVINCare Tax - 4th qtr 99 1,377.42
01/114/00 01/18/00 IVIN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 462.25
01/14/00 01/18/00 IVIN State Treasurer Deput Re #149 10,391.75
01/14/00 01/18/00 CBSA Dental fees 497.53
TOTAL 91,073.59
17
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS- EARNINGS.REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 SPANGLER, EDNA E
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 ALLENSPACH,SHERRY
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 ANDERSON,CAROLE J
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 CARLE,JEANETTE E
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 JAGOE.,CAROL
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 OLSON,SANDRA
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 ALDRIDGE , MARIA
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 BOHL , JOHN C
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 FLOR, TIMOTHY
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 EVERSON, PAUL
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 FRASER JOHN
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 OSWALD ERICK D
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 UCHARMED JOHN ,
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 PECK,DENNIS L
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 GREW- HAYMAN,JANET M
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 EKSTRAND,THOMAS G
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 ROBERTS , KENNETH
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 EDGE , DOUGLAS
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 LIVINGSTON JOYCE L
DIRECT DEPOSIT
0.1/07/00 PALMA, STEVEN
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 JOHNSON,KEVIN
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 ERI CKSON , VIRGINIA A
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 LUT Z ,DAVID P
AMOUNT
1746.63
420.27
339.27
1144.99
1379991
1355.23
991.15
2230.01
2397.65
2390.14
1661.43
2576.60
1949.31
1725.63
1824.03
792.32
1836.83
1803.23
2060.00
2079.00
993.64
2400.59
2579.73
2059.23
2031.54
iueo
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 FARR, DIANE M 2 85.51
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 NAGEL , BRYAN 15 0 5.6 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/0 0 HELLE KERRY 2 215.15
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 CARVER,NICHOLAS. N 18,03.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 OSTER,ANDREA J 1505.75
DIRECT DEP O SIT
01/07/00 ANDREWS,SCOTT A 2918959
DIRECT DEPOSIT
jDIRECTDEPOSIT 01/07/00 SAVAGEAU,STEPHEN D 1316903
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 HASSENSTAB,DENISE R 96950
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 MARTINSON , CAROL F 13 5 5.2 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 HI EBERT , STEVEN 2 8 5 9.0 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 DUNN ,ALICE 2328919
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 CORNER AMY L 74.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 HORSNELL JUDITH A 982999
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 SEEGER,GERALD F 319941
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 MOREHEAD,JESSICA R 37.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 COLEMAN,PHILIP 260.99
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 BELDE , STANLEY 2173979
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00-FRY, PATRICIA 1405o63
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 BAKKE , LONN A 2 3 5 8.4 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
i 01/07/00 BOWMAN RICK A 2 3 2 4.51
r
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 NKOPPE ,MARVIN 339927
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 CHRISTENSEN,JODIE D 644.79
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 PIKE,GARY K 1801.48
DIRECT DEPOSIT
r
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 ICKES,SHERI 1229988
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 HEINZ, STEPHEN J 2485.47
20
CITY OF. MAPLEWOOD -
EMPLOYEE GROSSEARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01 / 0 7/ 0 0 NELSON, JEAN 8 2 2.5 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 KELLY ,LISA 10 0 6.6 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
4 01/07/00 TET ZLAFF , JUDY A 616.3 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 URBANSKI , HOLLY S 1261963
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 ZWIEG,SUSAN C.1438.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
a 01/07/00 SMITH,CASSANDRA L 1261.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 SKRYPEK,JOSHUA L 558.21
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 HERBERT,MICHAEL J 2274958
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/0.7./00 STOCKTON,DERR ELL T 2026.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 0 1 / 0 7/ 0 0 MELANDER, JON A 3373947
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 ROSSMAN, DAVID A 2711.89
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 THOMAS -JR, STEVEN 17 0 7.16
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 PRI EBE ,WILLIAM 1758943
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 DOHERTY , KATHLEEN M 14 6 5.6 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 SCHINDELDECKER JAMES 1505963
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 HALWEG,KEVIN R 2430.21
DIRECT- DEPOSIT
01/07/00 OTIS,MARY ELLEN M 537080
DIRECT DEPOSIT
j 01/07/00 CASAREZ,GINA 1284.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 MEYER , GERALD W 1884.10
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 PARSONS , KURT G 15 9 2.0 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 JUNG ,STEPHANIE J 1601953
DIRECT DEPOSIT _01/07/00 MARUSKA ERICA 19 8.4 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 NORDQUIST,RICHARD 1503.34
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 JACKSON,MARY L 1292983
DIRECT DEPOSIT {
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 GAYNOR,VIRGINIA A 1120.50
20
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
SEMPLOYEEGROS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK. DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 OLSON ,JULIE S 16 9 8 , 91
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/SWANSON , LYLE 15 9 3 .7 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT :.01/07/ 0 0 BREHEIM ROGER W 15 2 9.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 LARSON ,DANIEL J 16 3 2.7 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 CORCORAN THERESA M 10 4 2.4 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 MOORE,VANESSA J 811.19
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 DeBILZAN,THOMAS C 1504966
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 THIENES,PAUL 2751.40
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 LARSON,DEBRA 81.33
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 CARLSON,THERESE 1643.06
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 LE , SHERYL 3 0 4 4.4 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 FAUST ,DANIEL F 3 4 2 9.2 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 BAUMAN , GAYLE L 2 0 3 5.2 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 KELSEY , CONNI E L 10 4 4.12
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 GUILFOILE KAREN E 2071.29
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 POWELL,PHILIP 1648.82
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 WINGER, DONALD S 3225.95
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 BANICK,JOHN J 2538974
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 KARI S, FLINT D 2 4 6 3.4 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT i 01/07/00 KVAM, DAVID 312 6.9 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT -01/07/00 RABBETT , KEVIN 2 8 4 8.3 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 STEFFEN SCOTT L 2 5 2 6.6 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 THOMALLA,DAVID J 2538.74
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 BERGERON , JOSEPH A 3367970
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 GERVAIS- JR,CLARENCE N 1737.52
21
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE -GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 LUKIN , STEVEN J 2120915
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 HAIDER,KENNETH G 3479.62
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 PRIEFER,WILLIAM 1821.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 KANE,MICHAEL R 2074.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 LUNDSTEN,LANCE 2305.55
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M 23 64.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT ;01/07/00 ANDERSON,BRUCE 3145.20
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 MARUSKA A 2074.43
DIRE C T DEPOSIT 01/07/00 HUTCHINSON,ANN E 1729.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 COLEMAN , MELINDA 3 0 3 8.2 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 GRAF ,MICHAEL 117 6.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 ROBBINS , AUDRA L 117 6.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 ATKINS,KATHERINE 1116.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 CROSSON,LINDA 1581.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/07/00 EASTMAN THOMAS E 2069906
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 STAPLES,PAULINE 2330927
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/07/00 SCHLINGMAN , PAUL 17 7 4.4 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
i
01/07/00 HURLEY , STEPHEN 21.81.5 4
4
DIRECT DEPOSIT;01/07/00 S Z C Z EPANSKI , THOMAS J 2 4 6 5.3 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT t 01/07/00 WEN Z EL JAY 8 1412956
DIRECT DEPOSIT ' °01/07/00 JOHNSON MEGAN M 230.31
76122 01/07/00 CARDINAL,ROBERT J.385.50
76123 01/07/00 COLLINS,KENNETH V 339.27
76124 01/07/00 WASILUK,JULIE A 339.27
76125 01/07/00 ERICSON,MICHAEL A 2328938
i
23
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
76126 01/07/00 HENSLEY,PATRICIA 159.36
76127 01/07/00 MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A 4065917
76128 01/07/00 WHITE,BARRY T 87.00
76129 01/07/010 CUDE,LARRY J 391971
76130 01/07/00 DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J 243.93
76131 01/07/00 EDSON,KAREN L 304900
76132 01/07/00 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 729941
76133 01/07/00 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 1582.90
76134 01/07/00 NIVEN,AMY S 142.50
76135 01/07/00 JOHNSON,BONNIE 834.58
76136 01/07/00 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1380.83
76137 01/07/00 PALANK,MARY KAY 1355.23
76138 01/07/00 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1355.23
76139 01/07/00 RYAN,MICHAEL 2849.39
76140 01/07/00 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1492.83
76141 01/07/00 BARTZ,PAUL 2389.77
76142 01/07/00 BUSACK,DANIEL P 1425.67
76143 01/07/00 KNEFELKAMP,KARI L 92.50
76144 01/07/00 KONG,TOMMY T 1154.11
76145 01/07/00 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 1894.43
76146 01/07/00 WATCZAK,LAURA 1984.51
76147 01/07/00 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 2581.17
76148 01/07/00 HALE,THOMAS M 1891993
76149 01/07/00 MEEHAN,JAMES 2548.23
76150 01/07/00 HEWITT,JOEL A 2767.82
23
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
76151 01/07/0.0 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1520.03
7.6152 01 /07/00 FREBERG,RONALD L 1950.39
76153 01/07/00 JONES,DONALD R 1523.11
76154 01/07/00 ELIAS, JAMES G 1824.03
76155 01/07/00 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 1725.63
76,156 01/07/00 ANDERSON,ROBERT S 1560.62
76157 01/07/00 EDSON,DAVID B 2338.17
76158 01/07/00 HELEY,ROLAND B 1533.63
76159 01/07/00 HINNENKAMP,GARY 2017960
76160 01/07/00 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 1477963
76161 01/07/00 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 1505.63
76162 01/07/00 SOUTTER,CHRISTINE 124.31
76163 01/07/00 THOMPSON,DEBRA J 325.89
76164 01/07/00 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1465.63
76165 01/07/00 SCHMIDT,JASON E 1199974
76166 01/07/00 ANDERSON,EVERETT 181.53
76167 01/07/00 OLSON, ARNOLD G 280.00
76168 01/07/00 OSTROM,MARJORIE 2150.43
76169 01/07/00 WENGER,ROBERT J 1791.23
76170 01/07/00 ADAMS,CAILIN M 40.00
76171 01/07/00 BENDER,JAYME L 29.00
76172 01/07/00 BLEESS,PAUL A 42900
76173 01/07/00 BRANDSTROM,JULIET M 172.50
76174 01/07/00 BRANDSTROM,RYAN M.206.50
76175 01/07/00 CHURCHILL,FRAN E 20925
24
25
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
76176 01/07/00 FINN,GREGORY S 1272.83
76177 01/07/00 FITCH,CHRISTOPHER A 51.25
76,178 01/07/00 FLUG,ELAINE R 179.77
7.6:179 01/07/00 FLUG,MEGAN L 103.50
76180 01/07/00 FRANK,LAURA 264.00
76181 01/07/00 GEBHARD,JILLIAN R 36.00
76182 01/07/00 HORNER,JAY B 28.00
76183 01/07/00 HORNER,MATTHEW R 86.00
76184 01/07/00 HUOT,ELIZABETH 32900
76185 01/07/00 KAREL,BRADLEY M 45925
76186 01/07/00 KLEM,JOSH H 45.00
76187 01/07/00 LINN,MATTHEW 0 33.00
76188 01/07/00 MARTINUCCI,ERIN R 27900
76189 01/07/00 MOHWINKEL,LAURA J 30.00
76190 01 /07/00 MCBRIDE,PATRICK D 55.00
76191 01/07/00 NELSON,JAYME K 45.00
76192 01/07/00 NIEMCZYK,ANTHONY R 30.75
76193 01/07/00 NORMAN,KENDALL A 45.00
76194 01/07/00 O'BRIEN,SEAN M 25.00
76195 01/07/00 PREW,JOHN M 33.75
76196 01/07/00 RAS,BRENT A 45.00
76197 01/07/00 ROBERTSON,MARY E 288.00
76198 01/07/00 RYDEEN,SARAH 21.00
76199 01/07/00 SCHNOBRICH,LAURIE K 80.50
76200 01/07/00 SCHWIETZ,KELLY A 30.00
25
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
76201 01/07/00 SHOBERG,KARI A 43.75
76202 01/07/00 SIVERHUS,TIMOTHY 45.00
76203 01/07/00 SPENCER,WILLIAM 56.25
76204 01/07/00 THURESON,JULIA M 27.00
76205 01/07/00 UNGAR,KRISTOPHER 43900
76206 01/07/00 VANDERBOSCH,BLAKE R 43.00
76207 01/07/00 WESTBROCK,REBECCA 32.00
76208 01/07/00 ZIELINSKI,JOSEPH R 6.50
76209 01/07/00 GERMAIN,DAVID 1697.30
76210 01/07/00 NADEAU,EDWARD A 2074.43
76211 01/07/00 S CHULT Z ,SCOTT M 14 6 8.12
76212 01/07/00 BROWN,LAURIE A 280.60
76213 01/07/00 CONTRERAS,GABRIEL A 190.40
76214 01/07/00 COONS,MELISSA 918.46
76215 01/07/00 ERICKSON,KYLE F 191.70
76216 01/07/00 FALVEY,JENNIFER A 56.50
76217 01/07/00 GLASS,JEAN 748.81
76218 01/07/00 HOIUM,SHEILA 914.18
76219 01/07/00 HORWATH,RONALD J 364.68
76220 01/07/00 KARAS,TAMARA A 724.50
76221 01/07/00 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 1216.03
76222 01/07/00 SHOBERG,CARY J 245923
76223 01/07/00 ABRAHAMSON,BRYAN K 402.63
76224 01/07/00 ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L.127.75
76225 01/07/00 ANDERSON,JULIE M 500.54
26
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
rrrrrrrr
CHECK DATE
rrrrrrr
EMPLOYEE NAME
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
AMOUNT
76226 01/07/00 BACHMAN,NICOLE T
rrrrrrr
42.25
76227 01/07/00 BITTNER,KATIE C 520.99
76228 01/07/00 BUCHAN,DAVID M 214.20
76229 01/07/00 DEMPSEY, BETH M 124.15
76230 01/07/00 DeGRAW,KRYSTAL M 395.46
76231 01/07/00 ERICKSON,CAROL A 40.40
76232 01/07/00 FERRISE,CHRISTINA M 37.38
76233 01/07/00 FONTAINE,ANTHONY 292.19
76234 01/07/00 FRETZ,SARAH J 65.08
76235 01/07/00 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 252993
76236 01/07/00 HAGGERTY,KATHRYN A 15.00
76237 01/07/00 HAWKE,RYAN A 184.59
76238 01/07/00 HAWKINS,LISA A 57.35
76239 01/07/00 HEINN,REBECCA L 164.43
76240 01/07/00 HOLMGREN,LEAH M 133.91
76241 01/07/00 HOULE,DENISE L 112.70
76242 01/07/00 HUPPERT,ERIN M 274.14
76243 01/07/00 IKHAML,JOHN 207.87
76244 01/07/00 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 158.98
76245 01/07/00 JOHNSON,ROLLAND H 37.68
76246 01/07/00 JOHNSON,STETSON 42.00
76247 01/07/00 JOVONOVICH,TODD R 47.60
76248 01/07/00 KAHLER,BRADLEY G 39.00
76249 01/07/00 KERSCHNER,JOLENE M 92916
76250 01/07/00 KOEHNEN,AMY 73.00
27
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
76251 01/07/00 KOEHNEN , MARY B
76252 01/07/00 KOEPKE, CHARLES E
76253 01/07/00 KROLL,MARK J
76254 01/07/00 MEISEL,TAMBREY
76255 01/07/00 MOTZ,ERIN M
76256 01/07/00 O
76257 01/07/00 OWEN,JONATHAN
76258 01/07/00 PEHOSKI,JOEL T
76259 01/07/00 REGESTER, DOUG
76260 01/07/00 SHERRILL,MASON D
76261 01/07/00 SIMONSON,JUSTIN M
76262 01/07/00 SMITLEY,SHARON L
76263 01/07/00 STEINKE,JACOB P
76264 01/07/00 SWANER,JESSICA
76265 01/07/00 TIBODEAU,HEATHER J
76266 01/07/00 VANSTEEN,JENNIFER L
76267 01/07/00 WARNER,CAROLYN
76268 01/07/00 WEDES,CARYL H
76269 01/07/00 WELTER,ELIZABETH M
76270 01/07/00 WHITE,TIMOTHY M
76271 01/07/00 WILLIAMS,KELLY M
76272 01/07/00 WOODMAN,ALICE E
76273 01/07/00 ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L
76274 01/07/00 BERGUM,TANIA S
76275 01/07/00 BOSLEY,CAROL
AMOUNT
674.35
45.23
122.40
152.53
82.84
20.00
165.38
49.13
40.50
37.95
99.23
154.80
70.41
235.24
105.34
209.48
104.30
111.30
26.20
85.15
922.17
124e18
51.38
59.38
160.93
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
76276 01/07/00 HANSEN,ANNA K 50.00
7.6277 01/07/00 HUPPERT,ERICA L 42.00
76278 01/07/00 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 104.00
76279 01/07/00 SHERRILL,CAITLIN A 244.25
76280 01/07/00 ANTON,SARAH E 146.74
76281 01/07/00 BEHAN,JAMES 1267.23
76282 01/07/00 BLANCHARD,KEVIN J 178.00
76283 01/07/00 CHAPEAU,GREG M 165.25
76284 01/07/00 DICKSON,MICHAEL W 872.72
76285 01/07/00 GRENDZINSKI,DIANE J 74.50
76286 01/07/00 JAHN,DAVID J 1291.23
76287 01/07/00 KOSKI,JOHN F 671918
76288 01/07/00 KYRK,ASHLEY 144.00
76289 01/07/00 KYRK,BREANNA K 313996
76290 01/07/00 LONETTI,JAMES F 579.78
76291 01/07/00 MATTESON,FRANK M 113.40
76292 01/07/00 MORIN,TROY J 180900
76293 01/07/00 PRINS,KELLY M 204.75
76294 01/07/00 REILLY,MICHAEL R 642.41
76295 01/07/00 SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M 158.64
76296 01/07/00 STEINHORST,JEFFREY 349.51
76297 01/07/00 YOUNG,DILLON J 145.20
76298 01/07/00 AICHELE,CRAIG J 1152.99
76299 01/07/00 MULVANEY,DENNIS M 1678943
76300 01/07/00 PRIEM, STEVEN A.1667.86
29
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
309660.13
30
AGENDA ITEM G Z.
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Ma and Cit Council
FROM: Ken Haider, Actin Cit Mana
RE: CITY MANAGER RESIGNATION AGREEMENT
DATE: Januar 18, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Action b Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
mom
Rejected
The resignation agreement is recommended for approval.
AGENDA ITEM N G
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Final Plat
PROJECT: New Century
DATE: January 14, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected ON
Paul Engstrom is requesting that the city council approve the New Century final plat.
Mr. Engstrom represents the property owners. This final plat is the first phase of the New Century
development, and would create 80 lots for houses, 3 outlots for open space and one outlot for
future phases of the development. This plat is along New Century Boulevard, north of Highwood
Avenue, west of Century Avenue. (See the maps on pages 3 - 5.)
BACKGROUND
On July 12, 1999, the city council approved the following for the New Century PUD:
1. Changes to the comprehensive plan. These changes were from R -1 (single dwellings) and
OS (open space) to R -1 (single dwellings), RH (residential high density) and OS (open
space) for the site.
The developer also asked the city to drop the planned minor collector street that would
connect the east end of Schaller Drive with Century Avenue. This street would have gone
through this site and through a group of oak trees.
2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) fora 178 -unit housing
development. The applicant requested the CUP because the F (farm residence) and R -1
single dwelling residential) zoning districts limit the uses to single dwellings in a typical or
standard subdivision. (See the property line /zoning map on page four.) As approved by the
city, this project will have 76 single dwellings (including the relocated farm house), 8 twin
homes and 92 town houses. Having a PUD gives the city and developer a chance to be
more flexible with site design and development details than the standard zoning
requirements would normally allow. The F and R -1 zoning districts also do not allow twin
homes, town houses or other multiple dwellings.
Mr. Engstrom also asked the city to allow the houses in this development to have mother -in-
law (accessory) apartments and have a variety of front and side -yard setbacks for the
houses and town houses in the development. The city approved these as part of the PUD.
3. Street right -of -way and easement vacations. These were for the unused street right -of -ways
and easements on the site.
4. A code variation for a substandard cul -de -sac where Schaller Drive meets the developer's
west property line. The proposed development plans do not have a street connection to the
existing temporary cul -de -sac at the east end of Schaller Drive. As such, the developer will
need to change the existing temporary cul -de -sac into a permanent cul -de -sac.
5. Reduced building setbacks for the existing houses at 2610 and 2611 Schaller Drive. These
setback approvals are necessary with changing the temporary cul -de -sac on the east end of
Schaller Drive to a permanent cul -de -sac.
6. A variation from the city code to reduce the required street right -of -way width. The developer
wants to reduce some of the public street right -of -ways from 60 feet to 50 feet.
7. A variation from the city code to reduce the required street pavement width. The developer is
asking to reduce the streets from 32 feet to 28 feet, 24 feet and 20 feet from gutter to gutter.
8. A preliminary plat to create the lots in the development. (See the map on page six.) This
approval was subject to eight conditions.
9. Having no parking for both sides of some of the streets and no parking for one side of other
streets.
10. Starting the construction of up to four model homes before the city approves the final plat.
DISCUSSION
Mr. Engstrom is progressing with this phase of the plat. The contractor has installed the utilities,
curb and gutter and bituminous for the streets in this part of the development. Mr. Engstrom has
finished all the conditions the council required for final plat approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the New Century final plat. Approval is subject to the:
1 County recording the deeds, deed restrictions and covenants required by the city.
2. Developer recording with Ramsey County deeds for the following:
a. A drainage and utility easement for the ponding area.
b. A utility easement for the sanitary sewer line between Pinkspire Lane and Century
Avenue in the Phylis Avenue alignment.
c. The easements for the permanent cul -de -sac at the east end of Schaller Drive.
d. An easement for the off -site storm sewer.
p:sec13 -28 /newcent.fin
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Proposed Final Plat
4. Preliminary Plat
5. 7 -12 -99 Council Minutes
6. Proposed Final Plat (Separate Attachment)
K
Attachment 1
16
1. HUNTINGTON CT.
2. Q4lCRIDGE I
720S
eL
17 nMeat
1. CURRIE CT. YN1FY
2. VALLEY VIEW CT.
3. LAKEWOOD CT.
Y of
4
O
rr.. SOIJTttc:RC•"
kD
r0
z
w
LOCATION MAP
3
4
N
Attachment 2
RAMSEY COUNTY. PROPERTY
r
I
2516 •'
o m
b ao j ,e
b o SASS) ....
y 4 I
LINWOOD AVENUE-.
00 *to 3.. C N
00 00
as
1 C o
Cx)
CO
so !!s
QO 00 be
11110
s '
721
r N, N 2616 A N 2532 9.w f,4 1) N N C*Pft
N
B 5 e.c
N A r 7 J )
T3oc so Mac.3) 751 • - a
Ca)411.F 3.61oe
775
C o: s
f
ouF t*
s
X ID
w' W
2 1
Q (s2)
MAPLEWOOD OPEN SPACE 3 ` }80
t3,1(sr t ,
0. 801 -'
V .
4215S SITE 815
3 (r4 .:... 821 >=
r T 4 _ ,a - Ilse.
rs . «, 831 m
r, b se.a•. . . cso. u.• _ j Q 4
w _ YI ! - - .
i 1741334 ,s I69 -
G.a
iJ :..•• '. .. F
21 f*- tT°I :B; . t . - TS1o77 - t3o4+GS os 07•NS•
N (9T
1 Na, ss * Ot1Tl T iO u Ln o ORA,IfI16E E >MT `'
o ggdlj S = N a • t'Ji -bo+) O! 07•19I1r 141A'
c, 9 13 O_ M" Q 4 °(c3) tc4) J. N) C4 r N N --- - - - -•- - - - of 841 Z
A
4 ' 1 W ( 4ti 3 Y try , b•- ... 9 y 9 - W
859y1 ' SZ 'o(8S 3 l ' 2 1 11S Ix .1 a vo 90 its
N O
c`ot N O _ O h
C'4N1N 87 3P` !O o 9
top
t i E , i • 3 ri ' G' -- --1 ZS ! ; {stj O e •` p„ si ll.f .a7 '
8771 w
I
4 , t s a , • tO G W O D : t o
0 g ` 6
Cd
N.
2 r c A .ys 1 9O o 'sir b
9
0 o p :es , .
3 P, ZN K 4 s - 6` x •- e ITELs- - 91 <Z 0
s.", H 1 H O D e_
r
44
1(14) o (0 w A r) iz) ia (r4 ls (Ib;, 1I7 ~ ' 2585 '924LLtSA :w o I rat 60 i
r3) 923AYEALLEYtVtEW
O
AVE
115. . = @& . ' • . z ' ' 932 -
80• >> • , ti
o •l ° ' S5 • 23)cS4 , C) C g43 : E.47se. ,.d i4
0 "' 2 , 4 1 s 3 s 7 N N 9,40 ,l2 J 1` •73.32. '4G..7 .O :
40 1 i (« 2 -r • • ts.rs J „a
1.02 . 4.qz_ -- • = - 953
o o,.9sa t: 13 !2 ' 1, r'
4 , "
963. : + N
I
a Cad - Q -
0
HIGHWOOD AVENUE = _.. b . - -AV - -
t=."Ib .5'=' i4j.OT.' 1•N.4(. Lo _ l rd-- io - _'t_4 yeas io , '0 . _ . - ?a . /3/ 40 !; loo 175 O 8b i 140• a3' 1' -
i o 1 ;34 CZ= o o (_ / a c ' 967 1 ., [ i ' v ` ,' •T
i o i
I l3s °_ IZ o I 1 _9671 968. _ Q c 00 , , _ ;•
f) 135 1: • - - - .e ° •--w 966. 2660 co co I _ Q . ,
H I G 2OD : 975 W 976, —°t :) N
J
d 97 r ( °
M 154 M w ^ I Sf Q -` , 2 I}sssc • ° ( ' ,
rr) ro ,!z)10 m : j xs) (z I I " 983 0 , 984 s 983: u -J
K Q m too IIO 4 ' !4O :.I oe"
r I ^ o 13109 . 414 LL) Z P:I; 10 N 4 la ., cc ,
w
NEW ,iM oso ; . ;3e,
Q J
m ,ao a° , a.. ° ,
c . w 992 Z gg1 22 o S O
r §'
p d ,30} e • s cv S %ATE (8; 5 ,
s . +; MCI TOWER '1 , c39, a
t ,
j (lo . H H
7J • 6 `ma u ^ 1 3 L 6 S) . 9 22 ( 4.3 i .... ,
f..r (4) 4'
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
4.
4
N
EUQ
logo %
Ulm %"
GompoPmemom
10"
1
1 /
a
wt
WSW %"
Gowa•
w"go
3
wwotw"=
a%
wwwr••
w._
1 =1
NEW
CENTURY
i
3tanlr
w.
K+ c _ _........ _ .
14
VIM
N0
C1i
114M,
Im
t
Y-
4
r
Q
L
J
Lu
V
I
i
r
Mw
Jam.t•
M
w
i
scw — —
de
JML
t
tom;
4
OoGx
t?'
a`"., '
Tiw'
JIH
y!
a
C
A.
DRAIN
AN
un `
swats
I
j
s •
wm
mmo
o1T
PT
GRAPHIC
SCALE
Mnw
vwl
a
4.
lommyow
Cr
Im
RAT
0
100
iwo
Mme®
Res.
110,
I
sm&
a
Ml
mTM
FHBEI/
Y
mo
T
y , /
0 '
m
ODrOIEf.
RAYEY
COL111r
CAW
NION
YONIAIlIrT.
smm
IN
FM
a...•
t.
ray
r4
KWao<
s
a
TM
PLAT, '*
C
MU
UK
ac
M
1
Al
T
1/
4
a
TM
ME
1/
4
a
AUUMM
10
HAVE
A
rA
IM
Scale;
1
inch —
200
fact
Cr
wacrynm
SHEETS
1
OF
1
SHEETS
Attachment 4
MOWPHOTOWWH
ELp iR 2 9
Q
n
a
Dow
PRELIMINARY PLAT
s
Attachment 5
MINUTES "LEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:40 P.M., Monday, July 12 1999
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 99 -15
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
1. New Century PUD (Highwood and Century Avenues)
Comprehensive Plan Changes - (4 votes)
Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
Street Right -of -Way Vacations
Easement Vacations
Code Variation - Street Right -of -Way Width
Code Variation - Street Pavement Width
Preliminary Plat
No Parking on Streets
Early Start of Construction of Model Homes
b. Associate Planner Ken Roberts presented the specifics of the report.
Mayor Rossbach moved to allow the developer to answer questions posed by the council since this was not a
public hearing.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
c. Jack Buxell, architect representing the Robert Engstrom Companies for New Century Development
answered questions posed by the Council.
Councilmember Kittrdige introduced a resolution for the Comprehensive Plan change.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Kittrdige, and
Allenspach
Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember Koppel
MOTION FAILED
Mayor Rossbach moved to reconsider the vote for the Comprehensive Plan Change.
Seconded b Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Kittridge, and
Allenspach, Mayor Rossbach
Nays - Councilmember Koppen
7 -12 -99
7
Mayor Rossbach introduced the following changing the land use plan for the New Century residential
nt Wort o i woo venue, west o Century venue. ese changes are from - singledevelopment, g urY
we m g s an (open space to - (sing dwellings), rest entia density) an open
s ce. h a site, is reso ution also ro t e anne minor co Hector street between a east en o Schaller
nve and Century Avenue.
99 -07 -055
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Robert Engstrom proposed changes to the city's land use plan from R -1 (single dwellings) and OS
open space) to R -1 (single dwellings), to OS (open space) and R -3H (residential high density).
WHEREAS, this change applies to property for the New Century PUD north of Highwood Avenue and west of
Century Avenue in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the applicant also requested a change to the land use plan to drop the planned minor collector street
between the east end of Schaller Drive and Century Avenue.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On June 7, 1999, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing
notice in the Maplewood Review and s::ii L notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning
conim- fission gave evi.ryone at the hearin a clitc n..c to sp.-2,a < and p.: sent writte _.tatements. The
planningTannin commission recommended that the city council not approve the plan amendment.
2. On June 28, 1999, the city council discussed the proposed land use plan change. They considered
reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
3. On July 12, 1999, the city council again considered the proposed land use plan changes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described change for
the following reasons:
1. The development would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan.
2. This town house site in the development is proper for and consistent with the city's policies for high - density
residential use. This includes:
a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing and proposed low density residential and commercial
land uses.
b. It is on a collector street and is near an arterial street, parks and open space.
3. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because:
a. The proposed on -site pond and large setback from the street will separate the town houses from nearby
homes.
7 -12 -99 13
8
b. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values.
c. There would be no traffic from this development on existing local residential streets.
4. The city nor the developer plan to build the proposed collector street between the east end of Schaller Drive
A ........_, ]...r,........•., s3+. ;t r.'x ;At]4., - *nA.+rA*%C .unve .makPJtAiffa_cultin -build . astrret.in thisn L.tI 1l. YG11LLG U%w%daLiJL Lllb %vd%L &11 .avaavv aaav avvv •• ..• - --
area.
Seconded by Councilmember Kittrdige Ayes - Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers
Allenspach, Kittridge, Carlson
Nays - Councilmember Koppen
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the following resolution approving a conditional use permit for a
planned unit development bor the New Century housing development. The city bases this approval on the Tindings
required-by code.
99 -07 -056
CONDITIONAL USE PERIIIIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, representing the Robert Engstrom Companies, applied for a conditional use
permit (CUP) for the New Century residential planned unit development (PUD).
WHEREAS, this change applies to undeveloped property for the New Century PUD north of Highwood
Avenue and west of Century Avenue in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
PINS 13- 28 -22 -11 -0008 0015 0014 0013 and 0022, 13- 28 -22 -14 -0018, 0019, 0020 and 0021.)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 7, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On June 28, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and
sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city
staff and planning commission.
3. On July 12, 1999, the city council again considered this request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use
permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the
city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
7 -12 -99 14
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property,
because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-
off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
conzestion or unsafe access on existing or -proposed streets.
V
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into
the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans date - stamped March 29, 1999, the revised grading plans
dated May 24, 1999 and the revised plat plans dated July 7, 1999, except where the city requires
citchanges. The ci council may approve major changes. The director of community developmentg
may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall
include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree and driveway and parking lot plans.
4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall
give the city an easement for this pond and shall be responsible for getting any needed off -site
pond and drainage easements.
5. The developer or contractor shall:
a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements and
meet all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs shall
mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting,
filling or dumping.
d. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
e. Remove any debris, junk or fill from the wetlands and site.
6.* The developer shall give the city wetland easements over the wetlands. The easements shall cover
the wetlands and any land within 50 feet surrounding a wetland These easements shall prohibit any
building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within twenty feet of the wetland or within the
wetland itself. The purpose of this easement is to protect the water quality of the wetlands from
7 -12 -99 15
10
fertilizer and to protect the wetland habitat from encroachment.
7. The owners of the single dwellings in the PUD may have one mother -in -law (accessory) apartment
w.itb xheirnronerty. Such accessory units shall be subject to the following:
a. Sucb accessory units may be occupied by one or two persons.
b. The accessory units shall not be more than 800 square feet.
c. The ci ty will not allow separate or different ownership for tax or identification purposes of thep
accessory unit from the primary residence.
d. The owners shall only rent their accessory units to those related by blood or marriage.
8. The approved setbacks for the principal structures in the New Century PUD shall be:
1. Front yard setback: minimum - 20 feet, maximum - 50 feet
2. Front yard setback (side street): minimum -15 feet, maximum - 30 feet
3. Rear yard setback: minimum - 30 feet, maximum - none
4. Side yard setback: as the zoning code requires
9. This approval does not include final design approval for the duplexes, townhomes or for the village
green. The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping and site plans for these to the
community design review board (CDRB) for approval by the CDRB.
10. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded b y Councilmember Kittrdige Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittrdige,
Carlson
Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember
Koppen
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the following resolution vacating parts of the unused Tim Avenue,
Mayhill Road and Phyllis venue lying nort o ig wood venue an west o entury venue in the New
Century ass own on the map on page o dev elopers application materials .
40000M10000001MEN
99 -07 -057
STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, representing the Robert Engstrom Companies, applied for the
vacation of the following described street right -of -ways:
1. The south 30 feet of the NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey
County, Minnesota, except the east 288.17 feet. (Tim Avenue)
7 -12 -99 16
11
2. The east and north 30 feet of the east 343.60 feet of the east two- thirds of the west 3/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
3
IV -is Avznue in A. BERG ADDITION.
4. That part of Mayhill Road in A. BERG ADDITION and that part of Mayhill Road lying
between Tim Avenue and the north right -of -way line of Highwood Avenue.
5. The south 60 feet of the north 190 feet of the west third of the west three - quarters of the SE
1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 13, Townshi p 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
All in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22 in Ramsey County.
WHEREAS, the history of these vacations is as follows:
1. On June 7, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve these
street vacations.
2. On June 28, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners. The Council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
3. On July 12, 1999, the city council again considered this request.
WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the
following abutting properties:
1. Lots 1, 7, and Lots 8 -14, A. BERG ADDITION.
2. Except the North 657 feet and Except the South 243 feet of the North 900 feet of the east 240 feet
and except the east 288.17 feet of the part South of the North 900 feet, the East 1 /2 of the NE 1/4 of
the NE 1/4 (Subject to Road) in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22 (PIN 13- 28 -22 -11 -0013)
3. The SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 (Subject to Road) in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22
PIN 13- 28 -22 -11 -0014)
4. Subject to Roads; the East 343.6 feet of the West 3/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13,
Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0019)
5. Except the South 657 feet; The West 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13, Township 28,
Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0020)
All in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
7 -12 -99 17
12
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
vacation since it is in the public interest based on the following reasons:
rr4,— •,,. +-Aw+y4 -oft MMA -4LU. AA^ ^3!10f^ A-4rAAt
4-t J1JG dUJkU;Q11L 4J1 VILJVI IlVJ 11" v u%avy vv1b ...v......v.
public purpose of street construction.These right-of-ways are not needed for the2. p
3. The developer will be dedicating new public street right -of -ways with the plat.
4. Mayhill Road and Phylis Avenue are too narrow for street construction.
Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge,
Carlson
Nays - Mayor Rossbach and Councilmember
Koppen
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the following resolution vacating the unused drainage and roadway
easements lying east of Sc Drive, west of entury Avenue and north of ig woo venue in the New Century
PUD ass own on the map on page 63 of eve opers application materials). It is in the public interest to vacate
t ese easements for the tollowing re
99 -07 -058
EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, representing Robert Engstrom Companies, applied for the
vacation of the following- described easements:
1. The north 100 feet of the east two- thirds of the west three - quarters of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of
Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, except. the east 343.60 feet.
2. That p art of the West 1/3 of the West 3/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 29,
Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4; thence North 00 degrees 36
minutes 28 seconds East, on an assumed bearing along the West line of said SE 1/4, a distance of
452.04 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing North 00 degrees
36 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 597.82 feet; thence East a distance of 70.00 feet; thence
South 09 degrees 30 minutes East a distance of 61.00 feet; thence East a distance of 150.00 feet; thence
South 33 degrees 40 minutes East a distance of 54.00 feet; thence South a distance of 130.00 feet;
thence South 67 degrees 20 minutes West a distance of 123.73 feet; thence South a distance of 110.00
feet; thence South 36 degrees 10 minutes West a distance of 105.36 feet; thence South 119.93 feet;
thence West 90 feet to the point of beginning.
All lying north of Highwood Avenue and west of Century Avenue in Section 13, Township 28, Range
22, Maplewood, Minnesota.
7 -12 -99 18
13
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. On June 7, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve these vacations.
2. On June 28, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The council . gave everyone at
the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
3. On July 12, 1999, the city council again considered this request.
WHEREAS, after the city approves these vacations, public interest in the property will go to the following
abutting properties:
1. Subject to roads and easements and except the East 343.6 feet; the East 2/3 of the West 3/4 of the SEJ
1/4 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0018)
2. Except the South 657 feet; The West 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13, Township 28,
Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0020)
3. The South 657 feet of the West 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 (Subject to road) of Section 13,
Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 13- 28-22 -14 -0021)
All in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described vacations
for the following reasons:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The city and the adjacent property owners have no plans to build a street or utilities in these
locations.
3. The adjacent properties have access to public streets and utilities.
Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge,
Carlson
Nays - Mayor Rossbach and Councilmember
Koppen
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the following resolution for a Code variation for a substandard cul -de-
sac where Schaller Drive meets the eve oper s Nvest property line.
7 -12 -99 19
14
99 -07 -059
SUBSTANDARD CUL -DE -SAC CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, of the Robert Engstrom Companies, requested a variation from the
city code.
WHEREAS, this code variation applies to the existing cul-de -sac at the east end of Schaller Drive at
the west ro ert line for the proposed New Century PUD that is north of Highwood Avenue and west ofppYpPrY
Century Avenue.
WHEREAS, Section 30 -8 (b)(3) of the Maplewood City Code requires that cul -de -sacs have a right -of-
way diameter of 120 feet and a pavement diameter of 94 feet.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to change a temporary cul -de -sac into a permanent cul -de -sac
with a right -of -way diameter of 100 feet and a reduced street pavement diameter.
WHEREAS, this requires a variation for the right -of -way diameter of 20 feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows:
The Maplewood Planning Commission reviewed this request on June 7, 1999. The planning
commission recommended that the council approve the proposed code variation.
The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 28, 1999. City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and to present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations from the city staff.
The Maplewood City Council again considered this request on July 12, 1999.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the above-
described variation subject to the city engineer approving the construction plans.
Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes'- Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge
Carlson
Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember Koppen
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the reduced building setbacks for 2610 and 2611 Schaller Drive.
Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge
Carlson
Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember Koppen
7 -12 -99 20
15
Councilrnember Carlson moved oved a the following resolution approving a city code variation to have 50 -foot-approve
wide street ri g Yht -of -wa s instea o t e - oot -wi a rig t -o -ways in t e ew entury .
99 -07 -060
STREET RIGHT- OF -`VAY NVIDTH CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, S Mr. Robert Engstrom, of the Robert Engstrom Companies, requested a variation from the city
code.
pPWHEREAS,this code variation applies to the New Century PUD that is north of Highwood Avenue and west
of Century Avenue.
WHEREAS, the legal description for this property is:
The south /z of1 the north '/z of the west 1 /z of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Sec. 13, T.28, R.22,
Ramsey County, MN. and:
The south '/z of the west '/z of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13. And:
That part of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13 described as commencing at the northeast corner of said
N.E. 1 thence • south along the east line thereof 657 feet to the point of beginning; thence westerly
110 feet, thence southerlyy Ytherl70feet; thence wester 80 feet; thence Southerly 20 feet; thence westerly 50
thcrl 60 feet; thence easterly ?40 fee ni ire, or i;ss, to tide east line of said N.E. 1/4feet, thence sou y y
thence north along the east line thereof 150 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to Century Ave.
and:
Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 1, A. Berg Addition. And:
The south /21 of the east '/z of the N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4: of said Sec. 13, except that part described
as follows: commencing at the northeast corner of said N.E. 1/4; thence south along the east line
co g
p beginning: thereof 807 feet to the point of be innin : thence westerly parallel to the north line of said N.E. 1/4
240 feet, thence y • e southerl parallel to the east line of said N.E. 1/4 93 feet; thence westerly parallel to
said north line 48.17 feet; thence southerly parallel to said east line of 415.95 more or less to the south
N.E. 1/4; thence east along the south line thereof to the southeast corner of said
N.E. 1/
line of said N.E. 1/4 of
4 of N .E. 1/4• thence north to the point of beginning. Subject to Century Avenue and:
The west 3/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13, T. 28, R. 22, Ramsey Co. MN.,
subject to roads and easements. And:
A pAllthat art of the east '/2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4, Sec. 13, T. 28, R. 22, described as
follows: Commencing a a pointoint on the East line of said Sec. 13, distant 657 feet south of the N.E. Cor. of
Sec. 13 thence West and parallel with the North line of said Sec. 13, 110 feet, thence South andsaidSP
parallel with the East line of said Sec. 13, a distance of 70 feet; thence West 80 feet, to the point of
beginninginnin to the land to be described; thence South and parallel to said east line 20 feet, thence West 50
feet, thence North 20 feet; thence easterly to the point of beginning. And:
7 -12 -99 21
16
The south 249 feet of the west 419 feet of the N % of the E V2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of
said Sec. 13.
Ala in ectjonJ.3 TnvmsbiP ; _R=ae2 ; Ramse_v County Minnesota. SPINS 13- 28 - 22.11
0008 0015, 0014 0013 and 0022, 13- 28 -22 -14 -0018, 0019, 0020 and 0021.)
WHEREAS, Section 29 -53 of the Maplewood City Code requires that local residential streets have 60
feet of right -of -way.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing several local streets in the PUD with 50- foot -wide right -of-
ways and reduced street pavement widths.
WHEREAS, this requires a variation of ten feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows:
The Maplewood Planning Commission reviewed this request on June 7, 1999. The planning
commission recommended that the council approve the proposed code variation.
The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 28, 1999. City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and to present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations from the city staff.
The Maplewood City Council considered this request again on July 12, 1999.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the above -
described variation subject to the city engineer approving the construction plans.
Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge
Carlson
Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember Koppen
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the following resolution approving a city code variation to have 24 &
28 foot -wide street instead of the - oot - wi a streets in the New Century FUD.
99 -07 -061
STREET PAVEMENT WIDTH CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom of the Robert Engstrom Companies requested a variation from the city code.
WHEREAS, this code variation applies to the New Century PUD that is north of Highwood Avenue, and west
of Century Avenue.
7 -12 -99 22
17
WHEREAS, the legal description for this property is:
The south %2 of the north '/2 of the west 1 /2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Sec. 13, T.28, R.22, Ramsey
vVa..tttiy • t•a •. v..•
The south %2 of the west Y2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13. And:
That part of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13 described as commencing at the northeast corner of said N.E.
1/4; thence south along the east line thereof 657 feet to the point of beginning; thence westerly 110 feet; thence
southerly 70 feet; thence westerly 80 feet; thence southerly 20 feet; thence westerly 50 feet; thence southerly
60 feet• thence easterly 240 feet more or less, to the east line of said N.E. 1/4 thence north along the east line
thereof 150 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to Century Ave. and:
Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 1, A. Berg Addition. And:
The south Y2 of the east '/2 of the N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4: of said Sec. 13, except that part described as
follows: commencing at the northeast corner of said N.E. 1/4; thence south along the east line thereof 807 feet
to the point of beginning: thence westerly parallel to the north line of said N.E. 1/4 240 feet; thence southerly
parallel to the east line of said N.E. 1/4 93 feet; thence westerly parallel to said north line 48.17 feet; thence
southerly parallel to said east line of 415.95 more or less to the south line of said N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4; thence
east along the south line thereof to the southeast corner of said N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4; thence north to the point of
beginning. Subject to Century Avenue. and:
The west 3/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13, T. 28, R. 22, Ramsey Co. MN., subject to
roads and easements. And:
All that part of the east '/2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4, Sec. 13, T. 28, R. 22, described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the East line of said Sec. 13, distant 657 feet south of the N.E. Cor. of said Sec. 13,
thence West and parallel with the North line of said Sec. 13, 110 feet, thence South and parallel with the East line of
said Sec. 13, a distance of 70 feet; thence West 80 feet, to the point of beginning to the land to be described; thence
South and parallel to said east line 20 feet, thence West 50 feet, thence North 20 feet; thence easterly to the point of
beginning. And:
The south 249 feet of the west 419 feet of the N Y2 of the E %2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said
Sec. 13.
All in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PINS 13- 28 -22 -11 -0008, 0015,
0014, 0013 and 0022, 13- 28 -22 -14 -0018, 0019, 0020 and 0021.)
WHEREAS, Section 29- 52(a)(9) of the Maplewood City Code requires that local residential streets shall be 32
feet in width, measured between faces of curbs.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 28- foot -wide, 24- foot -wide and 20- foot -wide streets with no parking
on one side and no parking on both sides .
WHEREAS, this requires a variation of four feet, eight feet and twelve feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows:
7 -12 -99 23
The Maplewood Planning Commission reviewed this. request on June 7, 1999. The planning commission
recommended that the council approve the proposed code variation.
P manl ewood CitvCouncil held a,public hearing on June 28, 1999. City staff published a notice in the
Review and sent notices to the surroundin property owners. ine council gave everyone art tne'neui ig -a
Maplewood R g P
chance to speak and to present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from
the city staff.
The Maplewood City Council again considered this request on July 12, 19990
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the above - described
Jvariationsubject to no on one side of the 28- foot -wide streets, no both sides of the 24 -foot wide streets and
the developer paying the city for the cost of no- parking signs.
Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge
Carlson
Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember Koppen
Councilmember Kittridge moved to approve the following resolution approving a city code variation for 28 -foot-
wide and 24- foot -wide public streets in t e ew entury PUD.
Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge
Carlson
Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember Koppen
Councilmember Kittridge moved to eliminate access to Highwood Avenue.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Kittridge & Carlson
Nays - Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers
Allenspach & Koppen
M FAILED L f l Co iJ i I
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the New Century preliminary plat (received by the city on March 26,
1999 and the revised grading p ans receive y the city on May an the revise preliminary plat receive
y the ity on July e developer shall complete the following be tore e city council approves the ina
p at:
1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city
requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Have NSP install Group V rate street lights in at least nine locations - primarily at street
7 -12 -99 24
19
intersections. The exact style and location shall be subject to the city engineer's approval.
d. Pay the city for the cost of traffic - control, street identification and no parking signs.
e. Provide all required and necessary easements.
f. Demolish, remove or move the existing house and buildings at 2665 Highwood Avenue, and all
other buildings, scrap metal, debris, vehicles and junk from the site.
g. Cap, seal and abandon all wells on site and remove any septic systems or drainfields within the plat,
subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines.
h. Complete all the curb and gutter on the Schaller Drive cul -de -sac to the west side of the site, repair
the cul -de -sac pavement and restore and sod the boulevards.
I. For the trails, do the following:
1) Construct an eight- foot -wide paved walkway between Lots 4 and 5, Block 2 as
shown on the plat date - stamped May 24, 1999. This trail shall be in an 18- foot -wide
trailway or pedestrian way.
2) The developer also shall build the wood -chip trails and sidewalks as shown on the
application materials and project plans.
3) The developer shall install posts at the end of the trails to prevent cars or trucks
from using the trail.
4) The developer shall build the trails and sidewalks with the streets.
5) The city engineer must approve these plans.
j. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs shall
mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting,
filling, grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign design and
location before the contractor installs them. The developer or contractor shall install these
signs before the city issues building permits in this plat.
k. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
1. Install signs where the driveways for the twin homes and for the town houses intersect the
public streets indicating that they are private driveways.
M. Have an independent qualified geotechnical engineering and soil testing firm monitor and
inspect the pond during its construction. The city shall pre - approve the inspection firm(s)
before they start their work.
2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include grading,
utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail, sidewalk and street plans. The plans shall meet the following
conditions:
7 -12 -99 25
20
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code.
b. The grading plan shall show:
1) The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site.
The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat.
2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
3) House pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large
trees.
4) The proposed street grades as allowed by the city engineer.
5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the
plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1.
6) All retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a
building permit from the city.
7) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city
engineer.
C.* The tree plan shall:
1) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or final plat approval.
2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan shall
include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous trees
shall be at least two and one half (2'/2) inches in diameter and shall be a mix of red
and white oaks, ash and sugar maples. The coniferous trees shall be at least eight (8)
feet tall and shall be a mix of Austrian pine and other species.
4) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
5) Include for city staff a detailed boulevard tree planting plan and material list.
d. The street and utility plans shall show:
1) Paved walkways in a trailway or pedestrian way as shown on the proposed plans
and between Lots 4 and 5, Block 2. The parks and recreation director shall approve
their design.
2) The public streets shall be a 9 -ton design with a maximum street grade of eight
percent and the maximum street grade within 75 feet of all intersections at two
percent.
7 -12 -99 26
21
3) All the streets, parking areas and driveways with continuous concrete curb and
gutter except where the city engineer decides that it is not needed for drainage
purposes.
All ublic street n ht -ot -ways snail be at ieasi du- ieei =wiae, unlessihe city iiii ( 4) P g
approves a narrower street right -of -way.
The co of the curb and gutter on the existing Schaller Drive cul -de -sac, theC ) P .
repair or replacement of the cul -de -sac pavement and the restoration and sodding ofPP
the boulevards around the cul -de -sac.
e. The drainage plan shall ensure that there is no increase in the rate of storm water run -off
leavin g the site above the current (predevelopment) levels.
A qualified g geotechnicalengineer shall design the storm water pond proposed at thef.
southeast corner of the site. The proposed design shall be subject to a quality engineering
view and recommendation b a eotechnical engineer approved by the city engineer.peer review Y g
The developer shall pay for this review. The developer's consultants shall complete this
review and approval before submitting the final construction plans to the city engineer.
Additional subsurface soil evaluations also shall be required within the proposed pond and
berm areas.
3. Change the plat as follows:
a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer.
b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These
easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide
along the side property lines.
C. Revise the lot lines in Block Two so there is an 18- foot -wide trail or pedestrian way
between Lots 4 and 5 to accommodate the trail and watermain to Schaller Drive.
d. Show the wetland boundaries on the final plat as approved by the watershed district.
e. Show all public street right -of -ways at 60 feet wide, unless the city council approves
narrower street right -of -ways.
f, Make as many of the property lines as is reasonably possible radial to the cul -de -sacs or
perpendicular to the street right -of -ways.
g gChange the 40- foot -wide trail easement at the west end of Promontory Place (Dahl Avenue)
between Lots 12 and 13, Block 1) to a 40- foot -wide trail or pedestrian way.
4. Secure and provide all required easements for the development. These shall include:
a. Any off -site drainage and utility easements.
b. Wetland easements over wetlands and any land within 50 feet surrounding a Class II
7 -12 -99 27
22
wetla nd. The easement shall P any building or structures within 50 feet of the Class HY
wetland or any mowing, cutting, filling, grading or dumping within 50 feet of the wetland or
within the wetland itself.
The purpose of these easements is to protect tlhe water quality of t'ne wetlands from ferrWfter
and runoff. They also are to protect the wetland habitat from encroachment.
S. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city
engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not
completed before final plat approval.
6. Record the following with the final plat:
a. All homeowners association documents.
b. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits driveways on Lots 11 and 12, Block 4 from
going onto Highwood Avenue.
C. Deeds dedicating the necessary wetland buffer easements surrounding any wetland.
d. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision or splitting of the lots
or P arcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless approved by the city
council.
The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the city for
approval before recording.
7. Show the wetland boundaries on the plat as approved by the watershed district. A trained and qualified
person must delineate the wetlands. This person shall prepare a wetland delineation report. The
developer shall submit this wetland information to the Watershed District office. The Watershed District
must approve this information before the city approves a final plat. If needed, the developer shall change
the plat to meet wetland regulations.
8. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District for grading.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community development
may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the
final plat.
The Council took no action on the request to waive the Park Access Charges (PAC) for the building permits for
the New Century residential PUD. This development would be north of Highwood Avenue and west of Century
Avenue.
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the following resolution for the on- street parking standards and no
on- street parking requirements for the New Century PUD north o t kilghwood Avenue and west o Century
Avenue.
7 -12 -99 28
23
Maplewood has a roved a residentiai YU anarC l la1 uiVr'aa'a •••• "'•••~•
THEREAS, Map PP
reduced street ri ht -of -way widths and reduced street pavement
THER:IAS, the developer wants to have red g
widths in this development
reduced street
as approved reduced street right -of -way widths and pavement widths inP
THEREAS, the city h pp
the development, ment, subject to on- street parking restrictions.
m the city code standards if they do notSection29 -52 of the city code allows variations fro ty .
WHEP,EAS, Sec (b)
affectct the general purpose of the city code.
prohibits the asking of motor vehicles on
IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that Maplewood p P •
NOW, THEREFORE on one side of the public streets that arecstreetslessthan28feetwideandprohibitsparkingbothsidesofallpublicandwestofCenturyAvenueinSection28feetto32feetwideintheNewCenturyPUDnorthofHighwoodAvenue
13- 28 -22.
Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge
bSeconded y Councilmember Kittridge y &
Carlson
Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember Koppen
is request to start the construction of up to .four model
memoCouncilmemberKittridgemovedtoapprovethedeveloper" qCoup
View ire e - be tore a city approves t e Final pat. is is su sect to e
homes on Red Pine Circle (VAHey
To — flowing con itions:
driveway to each building location before the cityI.There shall be utilities and a hard surface street or d y
issues a building permit.
2. The builder shall have each structure surveyed into place by a registered land surveyor.
Seconded b
es - Councilmembers, Kittridge, Carlson and
y Councilmember Allenspach AY
Allenspach
Nays - Mayor Rossbach and Councilmember
Koppen
7 -12 -99 29
24
AGENDA ITEM _v 4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cler
DATE: January 15, 2000
R.E: Personal Service License -- Individual
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
modified
Rejected MEM
In
Ann Goulet Mayer is requesting an individual personal service license to be used at the
Maplewood Community Center under the business premise license of Sister Rosalind Gefre.
Rackgrszund
Ms. Mayer has successfully completed, in excess of the required 500 hours of training in
theory, method and techniques of massage to be licensed by the City of Maplewood.
In accordance with Maplewood ordinances, an extensive background investigation has been
conducted on the applicant. Nothing has been found that would prohibit issuing a personal
service license to Ms. Mayer.
Rwo nmtzd2d
It is recommended that above named applicant be approved for an individual personal service
license.
AGENDA ITEM N_ 1
AGENDA REPORT Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
TO: City Manager Modified
RejectedFROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Project 99 -07, Hazelwood Street Improvements -- Public Hearing and
Order Improvement
DATE: January 18, 2000
Staff has held three meetings with the neighborhood. On January 10, 2000, the city
council accepted the feasibility study for this project and ordered the public hearing to
take testimony from the interested parties.
Included in the council agenda packets are the public hearing booklets with the
estimated amounts proposed to be assessed for each property.
As outlined in the report, the estimated cost of the project is $1,073,300. It is proposed
that the benefited properties be assessed approximately $310,420 (29 %) of the project
costs on a buildable unit basis. The remainder, $762,880 (71 %), would be from state
aid and other funds.
Staff is prepared to begin with plans and specifications if the council directs the process
to continue. Staff will hold an open house with the neighborhood to discuss the plans
when they are near completion. When completed, plans shall be brought back to the
council for their'approval.
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution directing
the city engineer to proceed with the final plans for the Hazelwood Street
Improvements, Project 99 -07.
CIVIC
jt
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 10th day of January,
2000, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed construction of street and
drainage improvements on Hazelwood Street, from Gervais Avenue to County Road C,
City Project 99 -07,
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the
hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on January 24, 2000, and the council
has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the
same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY:THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the
feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood construct street and drainage
improvemetns on Hazelwood Street, from Gervais Avenue to County Road C, City
Project 99 -07.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council
resolution adopted the 24th day of January, 2000.
3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is
hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said
improvement.
4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers
necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of
1,073,300 shall be established. The proposed financing plans is as follows:
Assessments $ 310,420 (29.0 %)
State aid 746,530 (69.5 %)
Sewer utility fund 16,350 ( 1.5 %)
Total $1,073,300
AGENDA ITEM No...22
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Rosoto Senior Housing
LOCATION: Southwest corner of DeSoto Street and Roselawn Avenue
APPLICANT: Rosoto Associates (Paul Sentman)
DATE: January 7, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Mr. Paul Sentman, representing Rosoto Associates, is proposing to build 70 units of senior housing.
He is proposing to build this project on a site on the west side of Desoto Street, south of Roselawn
Avenue. (See the location map on page ten and the property line /zoning map on page eleven.)
The project would be a 3 -story apartment building with underground parking for 70 cars. There
would be 23 one - bedroom units, 47 two - bedroom units, a community room, a library area and an
exercise area in the building. There also would be a storm shelter in the garage area of the
building. (See the applicant's statement of intended use on page 18.)
Requests
To build the development, the applicant is requesting that the city approve the following:
1. A change in the city's land use plan. This change would be from R -1 (single family residential)
to RH (residential high density). (See the existing and proposed land use plan maps on pages
12 and 13.)
2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) fora 70 -unit senior
citizen housing development. The applicant is requesting the CUP because the R -1 (single
family) zoning limits the uses in the district to single dwellings and their accessory uses and
prohibits multiple - family residential uses. (See the property line /zoning map on page 11 and
the proposed site plan on page 14.)
3. A reduction in the number of city code required parking spaces. Code requires two spaces for
each unit or 140 spaces. The proposed site plan (page 14) shows a total of 103 parking
spaces on the site. These include 70 underground garage spaces and 33 uncovered spaces
near the apartments.
also should note that page 17 and the enclosed drawings have section drawings thru the site.
These are to show the height of the building relative to the adjacent streets. However, the applicant
has not yet applied for design approval. If the city approves the above - listed requests then the
applicant will apply to the city for final PUD approval and design approval (including architectural
and landscape plans).
DISCUSSION
Land Use Plan Change
This is a good site for senior housing. It is on a major collector street (Roselawn Avenue) and is
near an arterial street (Interstate 35E), parks, open space and a church. The project should be a
good neighbor to the nearby homes. Seniors are quiet neighbors and there would be a pondtng
area between the building and the homes to the south.
Density
As proposed, the 70 units on the 3.2 -acre site means the project would have a density of 21.9 units
per acre. However, Section 36 -114 of the city code allows the city to apply acreage credits to
projects that the developer builds with various amenities. Such features may include underground
parking, extra open space, more landscaping and having a high rise building (above three stories).
The developer is proposing 70 underground parking spaces with this building. The credit for havin
underground parking is 300 square feet for each parking space that is under the principal structure.
For this proposal, that means an extra 21,000 square feet of area can be counted toward the total
site area. This makes the site 3.68 acres and puts the project density at about 19 units per acre.
However, the maximum density allowed in the comprehensive plan for apartment buildings is about
16 units per acre.
To meet this density standard, the developer is proposing to get a transfer of development rights
TDR) for part of the church property adjacent to the site to the west. The minimum size this area
would have to be to meet the city's density standards is 1.55 acres. Such a transfer will prevent
further development on that part of the church property and, when considered part of this
development site, will allow this development to meet the density standards the city has set for
senior housing. Another option for the developer would be to reduce the number of units in the
building to meet the city's density requirements.
Conditional Use Permit
The applicant has applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD)
for the 70 -unit senior citizen housing development. They are requesting the CUP because the R -1
single family residential) zoning limits the uses to single dwellings and their accessory uses.
A concern that the Police department noted with this proposal is the impact on emergency services
especially medic services) that senior housing has. Having more senior housing does have an
impact on the police and fire departments. The city council should recognize this impact when
reviewing this proposal. Even with this concern, the city should approve the CUP since the proposal
meets the criteria for a conditional use permit.
Wetland
The project plans show a wetland on the southeast corner of the site. This wetland serves as a
natural storm water collection and absorption area for this site and for some of the surrounding
area. The Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District clarified this wetland as a Class Five
highly impacted) wetland. Maplewood's wetland protection ordinance does not require a buffer
around a Class Five wetland. The developer is not proposing any changes to the wetland and has
designed the storm water drainage for this site to go into a new pond to the west of the wetland. In
times of large storms, storm water may overflow from the new pond into the existing wetland.
K
Reduced Parking Spaces
As proposed, the number of parking spaces should be adequate for a senior housing development.
The ratio of spaces to units is similar to the Village on Woodlynn senior project (the former Cottages
of Maplewood) and the Carefree Cottages on Gervais Avenue. Multiple dwellings limited to seniors
usually have fewer cars per unit than multiple dwellings that are not restricted to seniors. The city
has recognized this by approving other senior housing projects with fewer parking spaces. (See the
list on page six.)
COMMISSION ACTION
The planning commission reviewed this proposal on December 20, 1999. The commission
recommended approval of the project subject to the developer reducing the project size to meet the
city's density requirements on the site without needing a transfer of development rights (TDR).
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Approve the resolution on page 24. This resolution changes the land use plan from R -1 (single
family residential) to RH (residential high density) for the site of the Rosoto senior housing
development on the corner of Roselawn Avenue and Desoto Street. The city bases these
changes on the following findings:
1. This site is proper for and consistent with the city's policies for high- density residential use.
This includes:
a. Having a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic,
racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should
include apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single - family housing, public -
assisted housing and low- to moderate - income housing, and rental and owner - occupied
housing.
b. Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the city.
These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs
and nontraditional households.
c. The city will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles,
types and price ranges through its land use plan.
d. It is on a collector street and is near an arterial street, parks and open space.
2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because:
1
a. The proposed on -site pond and large setback from the street will separate the senior
housing from nearby homes.
b. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values.
This approval is subject to the developer acquiring a transfer of development rights (TDR)
agreement with Saint Jerome's church for enough property to make the project's density no
higher than 16 units per gross acre.
B. Approve the resolution starting on page 25. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for
a planned unit development for the Rosoto senior housing development. The city bases this
approval on the findings required by code. (Refer to the resolution for the specific findings.)
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1 All construction shall follow the site plan date - stamped November 2, 1999. The city council
may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor
changes.
2. The project design plans, including architectural and landscaping plans, shall be subject to
review and approval of the community design review board (CDRB).
30 The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval
or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
4. The owner shall not convert this development to non - senior housing without the revision of
the planned unit development. For this permit, the city defines senior housing as a
residence occupied by at least one person 55, years of age or older.
5. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers.
6. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day -to -day
transportation on the site. If the city decides there are excess parking spaces available on
the site, then the city may allow the parking of these on the site.
70 If the city council decides there is not enough on -site parking after the building is 95 percent
occupied, the city may require additional parking.
8. The developer shall provide an on -site storm shelter in the apartment building. This shelter
shall be subject to the approval of the director of emergency preparedness. It shall have a
minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population.
9. The developer shall secure a transfer of development rights (TDR) agreement with Saint
Jerome's church for enough property to make the housing project's density no higher than
16 units per gross acre.
10. The developer shall install a 5- foot -wide bituminous path or widen the shoulder along the
south side of Roselawn Avenue between the proposed sidewalk on the site to the east line
of the first driveway on the church property to the west of the site. The developer's engineer
shall show the necessary additional bituminous on the grading and construction plans. The
city engineer shall approve the details of these plans.
11. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or a
building permit.
C. Approve 103 parking spaces (70 garage spaces and 33 open spaces), rather than the 140
spaces required by code for the Rosoto senior housing development, because:
4
1. The parking space requirement is not proper for senior housing, because there are fewer
cars per unit in these projects.
2. The city has approved fewer parking spaces for other senior housing, including the Village
on Woodlynn, the Carefree Cottages and Gervais Court.
5
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed the 35 property owners within 400 feet of the site about the proposal. Of the seven
responses, two were for the project, one was against and four had comments.
For
1. We fully support this building project. I have attended the two meetings. The need is great
and momentum for this apartment complex is growing and growing. We can't wait to see
the project going and completed! (Church of St. Jerome - 380 Roselawn Avenue)
2. See the letter from the Duellmans on page 19.
Against
1. See the comments from the Mathews on pages 20 and 21.
Comments
1. See the letter from the Oseths on pages 22 and 23.
2. They built the building on Desoto and Roselawn for pump station because apartments on
Skillman did not have enough water pressure and tried to charge all residents on the north
side of Roselawn Avenue for the assessments. Do not trust that it will not happen again.
Bergh - 495 Roselawn Avenue)
3. We want positive assurance that these units will not become low income housing and
thereby devalue our property. (Kolasa - 1855 Desoto Street)
0
REFERENCE
Site Description
The site has one single dwelling.
Surrounding Land Uses
North: Houses across Roselawn Avenue.
East: Houses across Desoto Street.
South: A ponding area and single dwellings.
West: Saint Jerome's church and school
Reasons for the Requests
This proposal needs a land use plan change because:
1. State law does not allow a city to adopt any regulation that conflicts with its comprehensive
plan.
2. One of the findings required by code for a CUP is that the use is in conformity with the
city's comprehensive plan.
The land use plan shows this site for R -1 uses, which do not include multiple - family housing.
The developer is applying for a CUP because the zoning on this site is R -1 (single family
residential). The R -1 zone allows single dwellings and their accessory uses. The developer chose
to apply for a CUP, rather than a zone change. A CUP for a PUD is only for a specific use and site
plan. A rezoning to R -3 (multiple dwelling residential) would allow a variety of multiple - dwelling uses
and plans.
Past Actions - Parking and Garages
The city has approved reduced parking and garage requirements for all past senior housing. This
includes the following:
1. Concordia Arms: 100 spaces for 124 units or .8 spaces per unit.
2. Hazel Ridge: 75 spaces for 75 units or 1 space per unit.
3. Casey Lake (Harmony School site -never built): 62 spaces for 62 units or 1 space per unit.
4. Village on Woodlynn (former Cottages of Maplewood): 87 spaces for 60 units or 1.5 spaces
for each unit.
5. Carefree Cottages: 132 spaces for 108 units or 1.22 spaces for each unit.
6. Cardinal Pointe: 149 spaces for 108 units or 1.38 spaces for each unit.
7. Gervais Court: 92 parking spaces for 60 units or 1.53 spaces per unit.
7
Planning Considerations
Existing Land Use Plan Designation - R -1 (single family residential)
Proposed Land Use Plan Designation - RH (residential high density)
Application Date
The city received the application for this request on November 2, 1999. The applicant agreed on
December 28, 1999, to move the hearing with the city council to January 24, 2000, instead of
January 10, 2000 as our schedule would have required.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
There are no specific criteria for a land use plan change. Any land use plan change should be
consistent with the goals and policies in the city's comprehensive plan. The resolution starting on
page 25 gives the findings required by code for approval of a conditional use permit.
Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve
plans:
1. That the design and location' of the proposed development and its relationship to
neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the
desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably
interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments;
and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character
of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and
attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal
plan.
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of
good composition, materials, textures and colors.
HOUSING POLICIES
The land use plan has eleven general land use goals. Of these, three apply to this proposal. They
are: minimize land planned for streets, minimize conflicts between land uses and provide many
housing types. The land use plan also has several general development and residential
development policies that relate to this project. They are:
Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic,
social or physical impact on adjoining developments.
Include a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic, racial,
cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should include apartments,
town houses, manufactured homes, single - family housing, public- assisted housing and low- to
moderate - income housing, and rental and owner - occupied housing.
0
Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate
buffering and separation.
The housing plan also has policies about housing diversity and quality that the city should
consider with this development. They are:
Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the city. These are to
meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs and nontraditional
households.
The city will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and
price ranges through its land use plan.
The city's long -term stability of its tax base depends upon its ability to attract and keep residents of
all ages. To do so, the city must insure that a diverse mix of housing styles is available in each
stage of the life cycle of housing needs.
kr /p: Sec 17 /rosoto. mem
Attachments-
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Existing Land Use Plan Map
4. Proposed Land Use Plan
5. Site Plan
6. Proposed Grading Plan
7. Proposed Utility Plan
8. Section Drawings thru the site date - stamped January 6, 2000
9. Developer's statement of use date - stamped January 6, 2000
10. Letter from Duellmans
11. Comments from Mathews
12. 11 -10 -99 letter from Oseths
13. Resolution: Land Use Plan Change
14. Resolution: CUP for PUD
15. Project Plans date - stamped November 2, 1999 and 1 -6 -00 (Separate Attachments)
9
Attachment 1
uencb
Ll lake
t
t
2640N --j J
I PWA CIR
3 K
OR PALM
s oR CT. p.
3
I :
xtKSroN o AVE. W `
LARPE MEUR AVER _
61
la SAINT PAUL
240ON
LITTLE CANADA
DR* is
LAW AVE
wrca+c M ,
LAUR IE RD. <
LAUPJE CT.
eta
Counnr RD. e *
ELD
COUNTY RD. B eu
V .,: • ' 1UpGE AV E ELORIDGE v
BEUIONi W. samowr" Loka
c,+..r•••itA:41 SKIU.A111N AVE. 1 / SmL" AV.
KEtiW OOD
SIgLIMAN AVE. i {1 W
MT. VERNON
DOWNS AVE.
Pork
8E3 LW000 AVE BEIJ. Ah
BELLVY000 AVE.
SUMMER AVE AAIER
FENTON AVE. s RPLEY
39 'n AVE.
J RIPLEY AVE
LOCATION MAP
o
4
N
Httacnment 2
Ib to is ,
vs 54 , G
3o r
1 30 1 30 1 (e S)1 .: 8
1973. i
N 3 'c ___.. -
4 _ 4 ' z 4 _' SCHOOL O ISTRtC
2d — — -
26 1 6 2 8 Zs -io 1949' I
24 ttt:7) I r+3stw)
23 `g O 23 8 .8 oac
jofpft4 r r b
ktN
22 9 22 -- -9
1•
t .
o
Z 10 21 Io N 21 a C 4)
r 1945 f 4
20 11 g 20 11 20 jN ' 0 AV)
gsl) rs 12 0 19 t2 r(o 19 r IZ
tg jl4t Q 8 ' a 3 • 471-
mo14443' 453
t (
i5 -
s 7S 15 7 7 T511 .f T6 —.
ROSELAWN AVENUE -
IV
QLock (7' ,n t
4-71 ac) 4.71ac 3.21 as • r f
o; 462 00 .82
500 -
c. • ' '
r o,
O 8 ac '' _ _i Lo
LU
CHURCH OF T. JEROME W
1915 , 1900
I ac oo r co rlzj
SITE
L `!499 o ly
I ,#
ST. JEROMES
u '2
2
Q-4)
4
FL4 ; ` 63
POND 2
e
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4
N
Wag
MKX
rMM
inIN
W J; 011
am MIT won
ON am Mill
iii •
lll
r -
i am .
U ow "Wo.
ON
1 1 i 1 3 y 1 1_ 1 1
o NO
N ON 11111114 . u i r
A i m -. > >
N 00 1- - .e /
11li 00 onrn 1Y1s[ l
pw
f
4
VairL,
1
7
I
iiilLZ11111111
1 A d t
ISaloop
MONO
iL4 Ift
I r
K
y
1 r
KEY
I eur
terchan a P= PARK
S = SCHOOL
U.1
E C = CHURCH4) R
Lo r CEM = CEMETERY
co W G = GOVERNMENT
OS = OPEN SPACE
3 (H) v R -1 = SINGLE DWELLIN
R -2 = DOUBLE DWELLI
R -3(M) = RESIDENTIAL
R .3(H) = RFSIDFNTIAI
u
RESIDENTIA
S
DIUM DENS
1H DENSITY
li •
pomw 'VINtlinrmim
bm"I
I , mix,r•
1
EWA
L
r
t
NIL =: J
i1jor arte"rial
R -3 (H)
0
Y%
I -I
LLM
TC
awl
L.i
fir.
J `'wkii 11
t;
1 i i i i! i i 1 1 t 3! i 1 _ 1 1 1
Pit -Now
1 a ` u11
Js
tInlhlllllL
1 1 1 t i i I l l i t i 1 2 I d I II I
twoJ. G P
1.1
P =PARK Fuvur
S = SCHOOL c
C = CHURCH
CEM CEMETERY R - 2 p
00
G = GOVERNMENT
OS = OPEN SPACE
R -1 = SINGLE DWELLING RESIDENTIA
R -2 = DOUBLE DWELLINGS
R -3(M) = RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENS
R -3(H) = RESIDENTIAL HIGH DEN RiTV
drieria
a
R -3(H). 'C
Iwiilii '_
10i 1-
uma-PEELIM PON" wo ME os Ira
o
NUNN
Ilia
l f-
I
it
has
i LAND USE MAP 4
j (PROPOSED)
13
IY.i
Attachment 5
E"
Nd9' 10'30 "f 327.22
a1.6s
R 0 S E L A W N A V E N U E
al ruuiWous ROAD) -1
y„....•-- _____ -- ..,_ ._......___.._ o Nd9' 1 D'30 "f 7.00 _.._
M .. ••-- •`• , '
o._ 1 19.21 S00 '42' 03T • 1 r +1r9 ? 1 `\
N99 ° f 0'30 "E - " :tl I •
j° t • t. I 1 r
i
T - - - - -
PROPOSES I • '1
r--- - - - - -- DRAINAGE -• I 1a 1EASEMENT (
f
11
R I :
TvpPROPOSED' I
61
1 DRAINAGE 1 i7R a 1
E f b
I q a IA .1R t3R I f
1
I
PROIDOSEO - — -i -- — — ---J N
J5' TEuPORARY1 1
IOrr t
CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT w M I 1
I i I
s.e la s '' •. I 1
1 2a /• - t ! 1 1
GRAPHIC SCALE
i • f>! a Y
KAW M fQT
1' = 30'
35 20
ASt14lvT
1
I
I
I
sa w '?"_ 327.
I I
1
I .-r 1 - - 1; 1 1 1 1.1
I s r
1 t
i
i
i
SITE PLAN
14
4
N
Attachment 6
J
MB9' 10'30 "f 327.22
o o '• R_ 0 S E L A W N —V - fi}- - -- •___ -- --
Y IIUY/N OYS - ----- w0 11 --
411 ---- -------------------- ft -------- - - - -. ..y....____ _'_ - -'- ` ' L ' - - -- - '•_ -- - -- - - - - -• - -- .. - - - - - -- Mss n:----- - -- -------------------- -- -: -- ¢ -- - 0042 to
a / -- ---- - - - - - - -
1 - :21 -- - _ _ _ ' -' ' " rfOQ 't `•`- `r
w1 -- -- --- - ---- - - - --- _ - -_ - - ----- -_•• ` -- IL
e - -- _ I _- ___ - -_ _ __ _ __ -- , ___-IWL -_._
I . -
1 1 ; -- ----- - - - - -' --- .- - -___•+ - _ , -I! \`,,, ; • / j
1 1 - 1 • I
PROPOSED 1 ,: -`` ` wCm {
EASEwN r ' I ` `, `, `_ `, t ,
AREAS WTH 410;iS MV EXCESS 1 C i
i i i i i OF I f 1MlL 9f PROTECTED WIN
1 ; PENIANEW TtPOSION CONTROL I i D `. i - `•
AIA r MLMIKE AND 11'1EN 5WOED; - ~
w , /
i r / '- n•
a
If Al-
1 1 hi .i i 1 1 ; i 1 PROPOSED'
AJNAGE1 /
ExscW(NT 1 •
IIR - •, ,
100 1'R EL - A84.2
1
2 -100 1'R .= M4.6 - 1oa IR1J1 + ,1
Al {
1
1 1 + JS• TENPORARYliCONS1RL/C DON' t b9 , 1 1 it •
EASE r • +-. ,` i •-- - - -' - ' - --- ----
vlfol
Ad
OWRFLOlW
i ``\\ ` ' 'I j 1 j 1 1 1 2jj t.
1 .7 1
1 YR.EL =•ed11.Q 1 1 , ' , ' ' h s
cz
ego ' • 1 0
1 1 , { 1 • 1 • • • • • 1 1 1 1 ' '
I i e76 1 1
1 i i 1 'f • • .j i l i' 1 1
a 74' i 1 1 . • • - __'s' . ; 1 / i ;
1 - - 7J -`.- - - -ter
t \ • ` • • i /• • I i j i j 1 i i
II
1 ( i00 YR EL• e80.1 i i `. \ `' •• • + • i ' ' 1 i i
1 ?-100 TR EL= M4 i i \ i -`: • • • • r ' ; ' 1
1 870 ' \ ,`` ``\ • • i i i
874
N, 880
rte,. • • . j I - • - 1 • • 1 `_ , ,
CRAPHIC ScALE __ - _ - _.
scau `
I ``\ , ,
y
1
V — 30 ,
so - - -- 1 1
1 1
O • {
1 1 fll
1 1 1
1 t 1 -- - -.' - - -- -- -- --
1
r
V
1
r
I
9
0
tn
W
A
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
PROPOSED GRADING PLAN
1
15
4
N
Attachment 7
0 ,. •aNe9't 0 3 E
R- 0 S EL A w N - - --• ---- - - - -- - -- ---- -
IIU9#NOUS ---- • OOAO
500'41'03'8• - - - -- _ _ _-- _ - - - -- - -- - .—
rY__ -,T. -- - - ..._+e- - sue-• \ - r ,,,. - ___ ,
tv'JrL7 •. -- --------------- ` -- -' -' --- ----- --_` `
r - --- ----------------- 0R - _ -•_- - •-- L---- _ - - - -_ ___ _ __•- _ _ - „ - - -• -
r- -t_ «•_ _ _ •- - - -_ • -- • ,` /r -_ - _--- -,,__ •-- - -
J• -_ ---- - - - -• ` - •- ' ,` -__•• I `\ •', - -•- ;- • -•••., I
1 1 1 i - 1 ' - -•i - •`` ` ,\ `
Ir-
Is 41
1 1 1
9- 4 1
1 1 1 \
45%-1 CP +`
1p •
t
Is
55' FEU1310RAR
1 1 1 1 1 I 01 • 1 -- ,
1 \ 1 t 1 ,w• - -- • ,
I I
I b :
I O i1in
cONS MUC T) , . 1 RE- 496.45
EA$E
RE aI1e0.4ox 1
1 NEH•r `. 1 . If =eas QL: ' - • _ - --
1 Ce -1 ;
1 / RE- 896.'45 ; / i -s-, • / ; Jo
1
I \ % ; Ok - 3.61 (N) , ,-( '' ., ' • 1• ', I I i1
I `. `\ NYV _7!_.40 „ ' r
WE Q 41, 1
I \; -_ ; , ,-e 417 . - bo.
1 S '1 ,
1 `` •`- •__ - _-.- `` 1 .+
st \ , i • A f ; i 1 i i
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
du MET cow ma ,Q 1 ; ; t
11 - « - ---_• ` , \ 1 i 1 "KC IURE • • • •1 f 1 • 1 1 i 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 / 1eN.9 1 ,
11
CJl1L 474 0 . • q 1 , 1 1 11
11 1 -.- -874' EI \ 1 1• •,- 1• _' ' f 1 1 1 i 1ov74.
13
i 1 1 . \ . a • • • I 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 'PON 80 rMk 868.0 27r 1a• \ \ , • ,`, ``` ` • • + ' ' i i i i
i 'f' - 417! '` i `. _ : '• i 1 i i i i
rte 'i '• -'-- 1
Ile-
GRAPHIC SCALE _ _- -- -_ _ r. - ... _ 1 r 1 •. ` 1
1 8
1 1 1
1 • = 30'
1 1 1 \
0
e
O
In
iY O
2
Z
V :o
0
h:
1
d l
1
11
h
1
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
418.1. u
I
I
1
I
1
I
PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN
16
4
N
v
1 = -t
SECTION THRU ROSELAWN'
LOOKING SOUTH)
ter / t f "
f . 777
z:Y.
anO , •
96E f
qr. 4',N .. .i ,• f . r• ".r .• .ter,:
NORTH ,:1.:'ef ,'f. .-"ti .:Y. .•.;.tit ; •...,;!`; ,
T.ez1' FWL 4100
R E MET \ E D
l I
C+
LOOKING WEST)
SECTION TH SITE
Sert ;a: Sentman Enterprises, Inc.; 651 653 6673; Jan -6 -00 11 :16AM; Page 2/2
Attachment 9
F P\,- F P V E D
STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE JA'
It is the intent of Rosoto Senior Housing, the developers If
located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Roselawn Avenue
and Desoto Street, to build a seventy unit apartment building for seniors.
There are projected to be 23 one bedroom and 47 two bedroom living
unity built on the property. The building will be three stories in height
and is to have a heated garage for each Irving unit in the basement
below the apartments, it hasbeen our experience and the experience of.
other major senior housing. providers that the occupancy in this type of
building would be approximately 1.2 persons per living unit. This is
inclusive of both one and two bedroom units.
Amenities in the building will include a controlled entry security system, a
community room, an exercise area, an activity /craft area and a library
area. The growing requirements and needs of the older adult population
of the area continues to demand additional special housing to meet the
lifestyle desires of this aging part of our population.
It is our understanding in discussions with city staff that there should be
no additional impact on the existing sanitary sewer and water systems.
There has already been substantial review by the city and the watershed
personnel looking into the effects of storm water runoff and ponding
requirements. The accompanying plans have been designed to not only
meet the additional requirements of this proposed development but to
also improve the storm water /watershed needs in the area.
We have already had a neighborhood meeting and found good interest in
the proposed senior housing concept. There seemed not be strong
opposition to the development of this corner in the proposed manner.
T was held in the Maplewood City Hall.
We hereby request conceptual approval of developing a seventy unit
senior housing apartment on this site. If the City of Maplewood
approves the concept of this development we understand that we must
return to the City for additional approvals, including but not limited to
building design and landscaping, before construction of the senior
housing can began.
Thank you for your consideration.
im
Attachment 10
r
659' .
Ken Roberts,
In regard to the proposed building on Roselawn & Desoto St., there are a few concerns that we have.
Are the sanitary sewers and storm sewers adequate to service this building? Will there need to be anyupdatesonthesewersystems? If so will the developer pay for this or will there be a shared cost to the
adjoining homeowners?
Will this always stay a senior building or can that be changed at a later date. There is a need for senior
housing in our area and this is a good location for it but we do not need any more apartments in ourneighborhood. We have enough with Edgerton highlands. I am concerned that this could be changed latertoletinsection8housing. What do government rules dictate on this?
What is rent on these apartments going to be? Will there be any subsidized apartments available for someoftheapartments?
The drainage that is shown looks like it is on St. Jerome's property - how does that work. Is the ro ertpp YstillownedbySt. Jerome's or is there a long term lease ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
We think this is a good use of the land and we wish Mr. Schreier the best with this project. We think new
development in the neighborhood is good. We just don't want it to cost us any additional money for
water,sewer,or storm sewer improvments. Thanks for any consideration in your decisions.
Tom & Audrey Duellman
1843 Desoto St.
Maplewood, Mn. 55117
19
r
Attachment 11
1E 11 ED
An
l -00V2
i .•Y
w ,
Together We Can
DAVID & TERI MATHEWS
1839 BURR ST N
MAPLEWOOD MN 55117
November 5, 1999
NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY
ROSOTO ASSOCIATES SENIOR HOUSING PROPOSAL -1915 DESOTO STREET
MAPLEWOOD
What is Being Requested?
Mr. Paul Sentman, representing Rosoto Associates, is requesting city council approval to build a
3- story, 0 -unit senior housing apartment building on the southwest corner of Desoto Street and
Roselawn Avenue. Refer to the enclosed maps and the statement from Mr. Sentman. This
request requires several city approvals including a change to the city's land use plan, the
approval of a planned unit development (PUD) and a parking reduction authorization to have
fewer parking spaces on the site than the city normally requires.
Why this Notice?
The city staff wishes that you be informed about this proposal and seeks your input in any of thefollowingways:
1. Mail your comments to me. Please write any comments you have below or on the back of
this letter. 1 have enclosed a stamped, addressed return Yenvelopefor our use to mail in
your comments.
2. Call me at (651) 770 -4566.
3. Attend the city council meeting and give your comments. You will be notified of this meetingbymailoncethecityhasscheduledthisitem.
Whether you mail or phone in any comments, please do so by November 21, 1999.
Co m e T '
i , t O 4 6 . -
1 j4iz- (4--1 Ir, 1r, -
We, 1-1 C4 i-
e- e c c , _
tw
Z/00 C.v
K NNETH ROBERTS — ASSOCIATE PLANNER
Enclosures
c:ltrllrosoto.let
20
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 612
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0 1 830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B 0 MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
04
p,
4`` i Lr ` "
l i \. 4r'
04, 41
GO 4-t-In
lell
6
Y ` („1 ; r ;.? d r -' ! f r. % -*mot . t ... - . '. 1 Z'"t
e-
p
LU t 1/t C
A4-i 1Ato
Dec
it -
r
t , ' - •°`-' ".'•'.,. -., G.i' ' .- 'ti•`' ` - 8 „ i.r- - 6.+i./4 L/' 1 1 6••[Crr e:. ` "i b rb N
41
j
N-1i'''t a s:r `» c fit,,. r r ! " 6
1 ° lei. L "J - • ' l >(. 4 -..(y ,.. {' , ••+ jE..i -' .',. ^..•.. /.._ ! f„•. E,`o ,, yo "' ,» ..L- .
r /, l i . ' ; yl ire . !!'11'v`.. ` - r \ t :'l .'.,,- :.'': .'-. <-
A
C-4 v
k -ei LA
f l.. 4 1. R r / { ty 4 ,-. , l • ...tom y .
VL
e cl ,
C - Z
cl
tl
f '
1 C.. ' 1,.. / 1 t./ ( r' %'j, l f/ f ,. i.. -. i r _v '... 1... 1 ' --(> •`1 - - .,r
4-o
10,b AA
J '.''t./ r/ t,. fi > ',` h' ±./ ' ` f
21
Attachment 12
Michael & LeAnn Oseth
1830 Desoto Street
Maplewood, MN 55117
651- 776 -2229
Community Development Department
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797
ATTN: Kenneth Roberts
November 10, 1999
RE: 1915 Desoto Street, Proposed Senior Housing
Dear Ken,
Thank you for including me in the survey regarding the proposed senior housing complex to be
built at 1915 Desoto Street. My wife and I are not thrilled that our single family housing
neighborhood has the possibility of having apartments on our street, but if this is want the
neighborhood wants, then, for the most part it is OK with us.
We will only be 100% in favor of this development if the city re -paves Desoto Street from
Roselawn Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue at NO or minimal cost to the residents.
I have resided in my home at 1830 Desoto Street since November of 1990. At that time Desoto
Streeet from Roselawn to Larpenteur was in extremely good condition. Going into the purchase
of our home from Leo Markfort (former owner of the land where the Markfort additions are) we
were advised that there is a strong possibilty that construction of houses will happen on the west
end of Ripley Avenue.
Also, Don Torgerson (former owner of 1822 Desoto) was thinking of selling his land behind his
house and our house (now Burr Street and Summer Court) and there might be construction there.
This is fine. We are in favor of developing the open land.
But, in developing the. land and building the houses for the Markfort 1 and 2 additions plus the
Torgerson B:rr Street urd ulnIII Court houses, Desoto Street has been neglected and in need of
repair. All of the construction traffic to build the above houses had to come and go via Desoto
Street. Desoto Street is in extremely poor condition. It has so many patches on it you can't count
them all. I can walk out onto the street and with my bare hands using minimal force pick up large
chunks of the road leaving gaping holes. It is crumbling more every day.
With the developments mentioned above, the City of Maplewood has increased their tax base by
a large number. But at what cost? These developments have new streets with curb and gutter.
Desoto Street meanwhile, has taken a beating and nothing is being done about it.
I am very active in the community and in the neighborhood. Back in 1993 or 1994 (I can't
remember exactly when) I brought a petition before the city council to have 4 way stop signs
placed at the corners of Desoto and Ripley to slow down traffic. This was accomplished and the
signs are still there..
22
Every year for the past 4,5 years I have called and spoke to Ken Haider (head of public works for
the City of Maplewood) asking him when our street can be re- paved. Each time Ken states there
is no money and it will have to wait until the necessary funds are available. This past spring was
the last time I spoke with Ken and he stated to me that it will be at least 2002 or 2003 before re-
paving can be done.
I do not believe Desoto Street in its present condition can handle either the increased daily traffic
from the proposed new complex or another construction project with heavy machinery coming
and going on the streeet.
The city council and public works needs to do something now to fix Desoto Street. We have put
up with an inadequate driving surface long enough.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call or write me.
Sincerely,
Michael Oseth
OAS
23
Attachment 13
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Paul Sentman, representing Rosoto Associates, applied for a change to the city's land
use plan from R -1 (single dwelling residential) to RH (residential high density).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property on the west side of Desoto Street south of
Roselawn Avenue (1915 Desoto Street).
WHEREAS, the history of this change is.as follows:
1. On December 20, 1999, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff
published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the
city council approve the plan amendment, subject to the developer meeting the city's
density requirements.
2. On January 24, 2000, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They
considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council the above - described
change for the following reasons:
1. This site is proper for and consistent with the city's policies for high- density residential use.
This includes:
a. Having a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age,
ethnic, racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types
should include apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single- family
housing, public- assisted housing and low- to moderate - income housing, and rental
and owner - occupied housing.
b. Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the
city. These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special
needs and nontraditional households.
C. The city will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles,
types and price ranges through its land use plan.
d. L It is on a collector street and is near an arterial street, parks and open space.
2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because:
a. The proposed on -site pond and large setback from the street will separate the
senior housing from nearby homes.
b. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values.
This approval is subject to the developer acquiring a transfer of development rights (TDR)
agreement with Saint Jerome's church for enough property to make the project's density no higher
than 16 units per gross acre.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 2000.
24
Attachment 14
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Paul Sentman, representing Rosoto Associates, applied for a conditional use
permit (CUP) for the Rosoto senior housing planned unit development (PUD).
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property on the west side of Desoto Street south of
Roselawn Avenue. The legal description is:
The East Y of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 17,
Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, except the south 150 feet thereof.
PIN 17- 29 -22 -32 -0001)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On' December 20, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve this permit.
2. On January 24, 2000, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
25
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan date - stamped November 2, 1999. The city council
may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor
changes.
2. The project design plans, including architectural and Landscaping plans, shall be subject to
review and approval of the community design review board (CDRB).
3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or
the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
4. The owner shall not convert this development to non - senior housing without the revision of
the planned unit development. For this permit, the city defines senior housing as a residence
occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or. older.
5. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers.
6. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day -to -day
transportation on the site. If the city decides there are excess parking spaces available on the
site, then the city may allow the parking of these on the site.
7. If the city council decides there is not enough on -site parking after the building is 95 percent
occupied, the city may require additional parking.
8. The developer shall provide an on -site storm shelter in the apartment building. This shelter
shall be subject to the approval of the director of emergency preparedness. It shall have a
minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population.
9. The developer shall secure a transfer of development rights (TDR) agreement with Saint
Jerome's church for enough property to make the housing project's density no higher than 16
units per gross acre.
10. The developer shall install a 5- foot -wide bituminous path or widen the shoulder along the
south side of Roselawn Avenue between the proposed sidewalk on the site to the east line of
the first driveway on the church property to the west of the site. The developer's engineer
shall show the necessary additional bituminous on the grading and construction plans. The
city engineer shall approve the details of these plans.
11. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or a
building permit.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 2000.
26
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
DECEMBER 20, 1999
V. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Rosoto Senior Housing (Desoto Street and Roselawn Avenue): Land Use Plan Change (R -1 to
RH), Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Planned Unit Development (PUD), and Parking
Reduction Authorization
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. He pointed out, at the request of the
developer, that the owner cannot convert this development to nonsenior housing without a
revision of the PUD and that the city defines senior housing, for this permit, as a residence
occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older. Mr. Roberts said the developer is
concerned that he may not be able to completely rent the building to persons 55 or older.
Therefore, he is requesting that the city change this Ito require that 80 percent of the units have a
person 55 or older.
Commissioner Trippler noted that approximately 10 percent of the property is wetland but there
was no discussion of the wetland in the staff report. Mr. Roberts said this was an oversight. He
said this is a Class V wetland (the lowest quality wetland) that requires a 0 -foot buffer. Mr.
Trippler asked about the concerns of the police and fire departments in regard to this housing
and what impact those concerns might have. Mr. Roberts answered that senior housing
typically generates more paramedic runs than asingle- family home. It becomes a question of
how much more senior housing can the city have before it is necessary to add more staff, etc.
Mr. Roberts said the developer would be allowed to put a storm -water pipe in the wetland as
long as the buffer area that is disturbed by placement of the pipe is restored. Commissioner
Ledvina asked if access to the rear of the building was not an issue here. Mr. Roberts said the
fire department requested better access at the end of the site but did not specifically say the rear
of the building. The topography and grading of the site would prohibit getting anything
completely around the building. Mr. Roberts said the fire department would prefer more access
but they seemed okay with the proposal.
Commissioner Ledvina also noted that there did not seem to be green space on site for the
residents. Mr. Roberts said he had not seen any but suggested that the applicant be asked
about this. He did not know where there would be room to provide any green space unless the
building was significantly shortened. Mr. Roberts observed that there was an outdoor
patio /porch area with a sidewalk connection to Roselawn Avenue.
Commissioner Pearson asked if there was a different time requirement for the TDR agreement
as opposed to the PUD. Mr. Roberts said that the TDR condition had to be completed before
the city issues a grading or building permit for the project. Commissioner Trippler thought it was
important to address two concerns expressed by the residents at 1843 DeSoto Street. He
asked if the existing storm and sanitary sewers were adequate to handle this building and if it
could become Section 8 housing in the future. Ken Haider, city engineer, responded that the
utilities in the area are adequate for this facility. Mr. Roberts said if potential occupants were
Section 8 seniors and could work out a rent agreement with the owners, they could move into
the building. Section 8 recipients who did not meet the age requirement could only move into
the building if Condition 4 was changed so that 20 percent of the units could be occupied by
other persons than seniors.
Chairperson Fischer explained that a senior whose income fell within certain guidelines could, if
the rent for these units were within an the acceptable range, receive a Section 8 voucher to help
assist with the rent and move into these buildings. Commissioner Thompson said it was his
observation that residences originally intended primarily for seniors "noticed substantial
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 12 -20 -99
degradation as they brought in the younger set." He asked to have it noted that the request for
80/20 housing did not impress him.
Paul Sentman, the applicant, responded to the commissioners' questions. He said these senior
developments typically take seniors from the area, moving them from single family homes to
congregate -type facilities. Mr. Sentman referred to the Cardinal Pointe building being built on
Hazelwood Street in Maplewood. He said of the 96 units sold, only 11 are to people who came
from outside the immediate area. In relation to fire and police calls, the number would not vary
that much but they would be concentrated into one particular area. Mr. Sentman also pointed
out that the building would be totally sprinklered.
Mr. Sentman said that specific price and age studies will be done before further review by the
commission. He agreed that a senior building is best as a building with senior residents but
asked for some flexibility until these studies are done. Mr. Sentman said a building developed
for seniors has certain amenities, i.e. a higher percentage of common areas, so that often it is in
a structured price situation that doesn't fit with a lower age group.
Mr. Sentman said off the patio side of the building there would be additional retaining to make
some "green area" for barbeques, etc. At this time, they are primarily seeking approval of the
basic concept. Mr. Sentman answered a question from Commissioner Rossbach on how the
size of the building was determined. He said when developing a senior complex, the amount of
common area and type of personnel (someone in a director capacity) that would need to be
there are split over a certain number of people. According to Mr. Sentman, it does not
numerically work if the project is too small. He said maintenance or housekeeping things that
people cannot do themselves will be provided.
Commissioner Rossbach asked for more specific details on what services being provided would
necessitate having 70 units instead of, for example, 50. Mr. Sentman said the square footage of
the units has not been determined but he expected they would run from 720/740 square feet up
to about a 1,000 square feet. Mr. Rossbach thought the density was "way too high for this area
and the building is too big." However, he did think it was a good area for senior housing. He
also stated that "it was a crummy arrangement when you start borrowing somebody else's
development capabilities from their land." Basically, Mr. Rossbach said they were taking land
from somewhere else and using it to fit their needs.
Mr. Sentman said the topography of this site is quite low and it will be filled but not quite up to
the Roselawn elevation. Therefore, the building as viewed from Roselawn will look like a two -
story building. He said this structure will be recessed into the ground so that the first floor level
is almost below the street grade from Roselawn Avenue. Mr. Sentman noted that there is a
wooded ravine area to the west that is unusable and a ponding setback area with recessed
housing to the north. He felt the only housing directly affected would be immediately across the
street to the east because there is also wetland and ponding area to the south.
Commissioner Rossbach expressed concern about the "overall impression when you drive
through a neighborhood" a large building stuck in among single - family houses. Mr. Sentman
pointed out that there are other multiple units located close to this area. This fact made Mr.
Rossbach's "argument stronger." He did not advocate putting more large buildings in the area.
Commissioner Rossbach said he could not see voting for this project.
Ken Roberts said the city's minimum size for a two - bedroom unit is 740 square feet and
minimum size for a one - bedroom unit is 580 square feet. Therefore, a one - bedroom in the
proposed senior housing will be about the size of the minimum two - bedroom. Commissioner
Pearson mentioned a personal instance where a family member lived happily in a senior housing
facility until they began taking approximately 15 -20 percent young physically & mentally disabled
persons. According to Mr. Pearson, the quality of life changed dramatically when these persons
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 12 -20 -99
moved in. Mr. Pearson was particularly sensitive and not favorable towards a building that will
not be 100 percent senior housing.
Commissioner Thompson questioned what the applicant envisioned for the land they "were
borrowing" to the west. Mr. Sentman said he "envisioned basically no change to that property."
He said it is "basically unbuildable land." The church has to address some watershed issues
and Mr. Sentman stated that these improvements will be paid for by the development. Basically,
the area in question will be left as it is.
Chairperson Fischer asked if the applicant would have a viable project if he constructed a
building with the allowable 51 units. Mr. Sentman said he did not think so because of the cost of
necessary additional site work. Ms. Fischer also asked if the project would be viable if only
seniors were allowed. Mr. Sentman thought it probably would be. The established standard by
HUD is that a senior is generally 55 or older.
Chairperson Fischer opened the public hearing to the audience. Bayford Leighton, 1848 DeSoto
Street, thought this was "the biggest bomb that's been laid in Maplewood" in the nine years that
he has been a resident. He liked the existing single - family neighborhood and did not want,
under any circumstances, this multiple dwelling. Mr. Leighton said a three -story building was too
much for the neighborhood. He spoke about the existing traffic problems at DeSoto and
Roselawn and felt these would only get worse.
Mr. Leighton expressed concern about the water runoff and did not think it could be solved by
adding dirt. He did not think 55- year -olds were senior citizens and felt there was a possibility of
parties if the building was inhabited by a large number of this age group. Mr. Leighton also
mentioned the additional number of cars and paramedic /ambulance runs that would be
generated by the addition of 70 units. He summarized by saying this was the wrong place for
this building.
George Sterzinger, of 487 Roselawn Avenue, asked if the age requirement on this housing
could be changed in future years. Ken Roberts said it would be necessary to go through the city
process and ask the city council to approve a change. A public hearing involving neighborhood
residents would be involved. Mr. Sterzinger was against allowing an 80/20 mix of residents but
was agreeable to the 55 -year and older age requirement. There was no further comment from
the public so the public hearing was closed.
Chairperson Fischer and Commissioner Frost discussed the size and number of units in other
senior buildings within the city. Commissioner Trippler asked if there had been any other
transfers of development rights within the city. Mr. Roberts said there had not been any in the
ten years he has been with the city. Commissioner Thompson wondered if the city had ever
checked to see if the value of surrounding property decreased after a building similar to this has
been built. Mr. Roberts said staff has not done this.
Commissioner Seeber commented on the number of large apartment buildings in this area and
asked how this building was "dispersed" by being put in this area. Mr. Roberts responded that
this building was intended for seniors only and that would be the difference. Mr. Seeber said he
was referring to size. Chairperson Fischer mentioned how it came about that Maplewood now
has "many fewer acres that were originally planned for other than single - family residential."
Commissioner Rossbach pointed out that Maplewood "has always been a leader in providing
diversified housing and affordable housing" and, therefore, there is "no particular pressure upon
Maplewood to continue to do things above and beyond what everyone else is doing." His point
was that this neighborhood already had larger buildings around the edges and he did not think it
was a good idea to construct a building of this size right in the middle of the neighborhood. He
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 12 -20.99
referred to other areas where the character of neighborhoods has been changed as commercial
or large buildings are introduced.
Commissioner Thompson spoke about property in the neighborhood that is "crying for attention,
development, improvement." He said some residents feel improvement has destroyed their
roads. Commissioner Trippler wanted to go on record as a "54- year -old youngster getting ready
to go into senior citizenhood" and he was in favor of senior housing. He had concern with the
transfer of development rights on this application. Mr. Trippler said he planned to vote against
this proposal because of this particular issue. He spoke about other variances that have been
allowed and feels that this may set a precedence for allowing future TDRs. Commissioner
Thompson referred to TDRs as being similar to water rights in western states and did not feel
they were as fearful as they were being made out to be.
Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Approval of the resolution which changes the land use plan from R -1 (single family
residential) to RH (residential high density) for the site of the Rosoto senior housing
development on the corner of Roselawn Avenue and Desoto Street. The city bases these
changes on the following findings:
1. This site is proper for and consistent with the city's policies for high- density residential
use. This includes:
a. Having a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic,
racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. a diversity of housing types should
include apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single- family housing,
public- assisted housing and low- to moderate- income housing, and rental and owner -
occupied housing.
b. Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the city.
These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs
and nontraditional households.
c. The city will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles,
types and price ranges through its land use plan.
d. It is on a collector street and is near an arterial street, parks and open space.
2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because:
a. The proposed on -site pond and large setback from the street will separate the senior
housing from nearby homes.
b. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values.
This approval is subject to the developer acquiring a transfer of development rights (TDR)
agreement with Saint Jerome's church for enough property to make the project's density no
higher than 16 units per gross acre.
B. Approval of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a planned unit
development for the Rosoto senior housing development. The city bases this approval on the
findings required by code. (Refer to the resolution for the specific findings.) Approval is
subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan date - stamped November 2, 1999. The city
Planning Commission -5-
Minutes of 12 -20 -99
council may approve major changes. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
2. The project design plans, including architectural and landscaping plans, shall be subject
to review and approval of the community design review board (CDRB).
3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
4. The owner shall not convert this development to non - senior housing without the revision
of the planned unit development. For this permit, the city defines senior housing as a
residence occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older.
5. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers.
6. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day -to -day
transportation on the site. If the city decides there are excess parking spaces available
on the site, then the city may allow the parking of these on the site.
7. If the city council decides there is not enough on -site parking after the building is 95
percent occupied, the city may require additional parking.
8. The developer shall provide an on -site storm shelter in the apartment building. This
shelter shall be subject to the approval of the director of emergency preparedness. It
shall have a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population.
9. The developer shall secure a transfer of development rights (TDR) agreement with Saint
Jerome's church for enough property to make the housing project's density no higher
than 16 units per gross acre.
10. The developer shall install a 5- foot -wide bituminous path or widen the shoulder along the
south side of Roselawn Avenue between the proposed sidewalk on the site to the east
line of the first driveway on the church property to the west of the site. The developer's
engineer shall show this additional bituminous on the grading and construction plans.
The city engineer shall approve the details of these plans.
11. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or a
building permit.
C. Approve 103 parking spaces (70 garage spaces and 33 open spaces), rather than the
140 spaces required by code for the Rosoto senior housing development, because:
1. The parking space requirement is not proper for senior housing, because there are
fewer cars per unit in these projects.
2. The city has approved fewer parking spaces for other senior housing, including the
Village on Woodlynn, the Carefree Cottages and Gervais Court.
Commissioner Rossbach seconded.
Chairperson Fischer asked if approving the conditional use permit is approving the planned unit
development as it presently exists. Ken Roberts said it was their intention to bring the final
plans and details back to the planning commission. He said this was a "preliminary approval."
Planning Commission -6-
Minutes of 12 -20 -99
Commissioner Trippler asked if he made a motion to delete the paragraph in the resolution
referring to transfer of development rights would it negate the entire project. Mr. Roberts
recommended that, if the commission wanted to do this, they should amend some of the other
language to specify meeting the density requirements or maximum number of units.
Commissioner Trippler asked to make a motion to delete the paragraph in the land use plan
change resolution that begins with "this approval" through 16 units per gross acre." Mr.
Roberts suggested changing the paragraph so that it says the project's density can be no
higher than 16 units per gross acre. He said Item 9 in the conditional use permit resolution
should also be amended to say "the developer shall make the housing project's density no
higher than 16 units per gross acre."
It was determined that this is not a friendly amendment to the previous motion. Chairperson
Fischer asked if Mr. Trippler wanted to amend the original motion to include this statement.
Commissioner Trippler amended the motion to have the paragraph in the land use plan change
resolution read "this approval is to make the project's density no higher than 16 units per gross
acre" and change Condition 9 in the conditional use permit resolution to read "the developer
shall make the housing project's density no higher than 16 units per gross acre."
Commissioner Ledvina seconded.
Commissioner Rossbach pointed out that this amendment could be met by doing the transfer of
the development rights. He thought if you wanted no transfer of development rights it should
specifically say so. Mr. Roberts felt the developer would then have to purchase property from
the church to make the site larger to increase the gross acreage. He said the TDR was a
request of the PUD and, with the change, this would be denied.
Chairperson Fischer called for a vote on the amendment which basically limits the size of the
project to the acreage which would be owned by the developer to 16 _units per acre. This would
reduce the number of units from 70 to 51 if the acreage remains the same. Mr. Roberts said he
would want -to consult the city attorney, if the acreage changed, to determine whether this would
be a new PUD.
Thompson, Trippler
The amendment carried.
Ayes Ledvina, Pearson, Rossbach,
Nays Fischer, Frost, Seeber
Chairperson Fischer called for a vote on the amended motion which is to change to an RH from
R -1, but reduce the number of units from 70 to 51. Commissioner Pearson asked if the intent
of the motion was to have the language remain the same on B.4. which defined the senior
housing age requirement. Commissioner Frost said there is no change from what is written.
Commissioner Trippler asked if the building could be defined as a residence so that only one
person 55 years of age or older would be needed. Mr. Roberts said that residence could be
changed to unit.
Ayes Fischer, Frost, Ledvina, Pearson,
Thompson, Trippler
Nays Rossbach, Seeber
The motion passed.
1" c .R.ah, t {t t y vk, b o a
7 : 0 1?w RdrdTa i toKsn1
cf!7-Z /
cacccr, . u
r1a n ro,//0 SO7
ff / /mi , /fO / / //[ //t'0
it
78
4p,
9.
t Ij
iit
1 ii
i
C ,
r V
f
i
11
f F.
o-
t
r
G4}
i
Y f
io
Z4AP
Jit,
VOW
0..OLokv-i ow, c vVA
6Af
s.
t
i
P5
ol
r iI mss,+ 1V \
Rte. . •
R...mw,.
c iV,
I
r i
k
1-07
aj
M
9,10.1
022
21
ic6c. Bvaw,Qov 6a E- ouw o'c --
fir h'«iSl 2 yz,z sT
y9v
Old, 4y,
chae / cS T nh, Yf l cic a53S fez -Owac
@ -''- /'- 3 r /jam .
VA t
ll . 'I
AGENDA ITEM NO... 0 -
000090M
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Code Amendment – Liquor Licenses
DATE: January 14, 2000
INTRODUCTION
Action by C
Date
Endorsed
940dified
Rejected
Staff is proposing a code change that would permit the future expansion of two liquor
establishments near the recently approved Woodland Hills Church. One is Party Time Liquors
an off -sale liquor establishment) to the southwest of the church (the old Builder's Square). The
other is the Goodrich Golf Course Clubhouse (an on -sale beer establishment) to the north.
These are both potentially hindered from expansion because of the liquor license requirements in
the code. The code requires them to be set back at least 100 feet from a church lot line. Both
meet this requirement now, but may be prevented from expansion if the church is approved.
Woodland Hills Church does not object to this code amendment. Refer to the letter on page 3.
BACKGROUND
January 10, 2000: The city council gave first reading to this code amendment. The council also
approved a comprehensive plan change to C (church) for this site and a conditional use permit to
allow the church use.
DISCUSSION
The code prohibits any on -sale or off -sale liquor establishment within 100 feet of a church or
school property line. The intention of the code is to regulate the issuance of liquor licenses when
there is an existing church or school in the vicinity. The code does not state this, however.
There are two such establishments nearby. Party Time Liquors and the Goodrich Golf Course
Clubhouse. Both are more than 100 feet from the proposed site —the problem, however, is that
the 100 -foot spacing requirement may prohibit the future expansion of either of these
businesses.
There are three reasons staff is recommending changing the code. First, these establishments
were there before the church. The code was intended to protect a church or school from the
introduction of liquor establishments into their neighborhood. It would unfairly restrict the
expansion of either business by limiting them with the 100 -foot rule. Second, the Builder's
Square building (the proposed church) is 450 feet from Party Time and 400 feet from the
Goodrich Clubhouse. Any expansion of Party Time Liquors or the clubhouse would not affect the
church. Third, churches have been historically located in residential locations. In recent years
we have seen churches begin to occupy commercial locations. One example in Maplewood is
the Redeeming Love Church in the old Montgomery Wards building on White Bear Avenue. The
code should be sensitive to the needs of commercial development in this situation as it is to
residential neighborhoods.
Staff is proposing a code change that would exempt this spacing requirement when a church or
school is proposed within 100 feet of existing on -sate or off -sale liquor establishments. This
exemption would also apply in cases where the liquor establishment would propose to enlarge its
building In the future.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the code amendment on page 4. This amends the liquor license requirements in the
city code to exempt the 100 -foot spacing requirement if the on -sale or off -sale liquor
establishment is in operation before the introduction of a church or school in the neighborhood or
if the existing establishment proposes to expand their facility.
p:orcNigiic.ord
Attachments:
1. Applicant's letter
2. Code Change
2
Attachment 1
C M U R a H
225 E. Roselawn • Suite 6 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55117 • Phone: (651) 487 -0001 • Fax: (651 4874007
December 10, 1999 '; !' s; % .
i •
E 1 0 19
City f MaplewoodtyP _ L t
1830 East County road 13
Maplewood, MN 55.10
RE: WOODLAND HILLS CHURCH
CONDITIONAL USE PEILNUT APPLICATION
To the Mayor and City Council of Maplewood:
The woodland Hills Church congregation looks forward to becoming a part of the
Maplewood community by acquiring and renovating the former Builder's Square faciliq
It is our desire to be a good neighbor in the White Bear 1 Larpenter Avenue area.
The purpose of this letter is to express our intention to not oppose any appropriate
expansion of any of the commercial ventures that border on this roe . Specifically, itpprtY
is our understanding that the city staff is proposing to amend the ci ordinance Sectiont
5 -38 Subparagraph (c) to exempt existing businesses which sell liquor from meeting the
100 foot proximity requirement to a church where those businesses were located there
before the church.
Woodland Dill Church will not oppose this amendment.
Thank you for your consideration of our application for a conditional use permit.
Sincerely,
4F AO 01
Bob Cutshall
Building Committee Chair
0
Attachment 2
ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REGULATIONS
FOR ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
Section 1. This section adds Section 5 -38(d) as follows (additions are underlined):
Section 5 -38.
c ) No "on- sale" license may be issued under this article, for premises located within one
hundred (100) feet of a church or school building located in the city, and no "off -sale" license
shall be issued for premises located within one hundred (100) feet of a church or school building.
The distance is to be measured from the main entrance of the licensed premises to the nearest
property line of said church or school.
d ) Exemption: The 100 -foot spacina requirement noted in paragraph ( c ) above shall not
apply if the on -sale or off -sale liquor establishment is in operation before the influx of the church
or school in the neiahborhood or if the existina establishment Qr000ses_to exvand their facility.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper.
The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on , 2000.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Ayes —
Nays —
4
AGENDA ITEM NO ...
Action b Council
AGENDA REPORT Date
Endorsed
Modified
To,. City Mana Michael McGuJre /),, 10001) Rejected
IfFrom: Chief of. Police Donald Win V
Subject: Recommendation For Zonin Code Chan - Sec. 36-6 (Second ReadinDate: Janua Oil 9, 2000
Introduction
sev years a an ordinance was developed for the definition- of, livestock. Rabbits were
included: in this definition.
Bp "kround.
in November, a Maplewood ,. resident asked that consideration be given to those people whoraiserabbitsfornon-commercial. purposes: (such as 4-H. clubs
Recommendation.
It is recommended that rabbits be removed from the definition of livestock In the MaplewoodcodThesentence 'l and other livin animals usual-l kept for a husbandr or
the production of edible or salable by-products will cover an commercial. g of rabbits.raisin
Action Re
Submit to Cit Council for review and action.
DSW: C%j*,o
36 -6 MAPLEWOOD CODE
Light commercial vehicle: A vehicle with a payload rating of
three - quarter -ton or less on which is attached a snowplow, glass
carrier, crane or similar commercial attachment.
Livestock. Horse, cattle, mules, asses, goats, sheep, swine,
buffalo, rabbits, llamas, ostriches, reptiles, genetic hybrids of the
foregoing, and other living animals usually kept for agriculture,
husbandry, or the production of edible or salable by- products.
This definition shall be expressly construed as having no appli-
cation to the ownership or disposition of animal addressed by
chapter 7 of this Code of Ordinances.
Lot: A parcel of land described separately from other parcels of
land by a plat, metes and bounds, registered land survey, auditor's
plat or other accepted means. Ramsey County must record the lot
description.
Lot area: The area of a lot, excluding drainage easements,
wetlands and land below the ordinary high water mark of public
waters.
Lot of record: Any legal parcel of land which is or can be taxed
by Ramsey County as a separate parcel, without the need for lot
division approval by the city.
Lot width: The distance at the building line between side
property lines for interior lots and between a side property line
and the opposite street right -of -way for corner lots.
Maintenance garage: A building for the maintenance or repair
of motor vehicles. This definition does not include a motor vehicle
accessory installation center or motor vehicle wash.
Major motor fuel station: A retail business engaged in the sale
of motor vehicle fuels that has more than two (2) dispensers.
Manufactured home: A structure, transportable in one or more
sections, which in the traveling mode is eight (8) body feet or more
in width or forty (40) body feet or more in length, or, when erected
on site, is three hundred twenty (820) or more square feet, and
which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as
a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation when con-
nected to the required utilities, and includes the plumbing,
heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems contained therein;
supp. No. 12 ` 2196
AGENDA ITEM K I
AGENDA REPORT
T0: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
SUBJECT: Harvester Area Neighborhood Streets, City Project 98 -10
1: Modification of existing - construction contract Change Orders 1, 2 & 3
2. Acceptance of Project
DATE: January 14, 2000
Attached are three change orders, the final pay estimate and the related resolutions for
the above - referenced project. The change orders have been written up separately
because of their separate classification and how they are accounted for.
Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $22,059.90 is for additional work that was
ordered by the city, but where there was no "Unit Price" contract bid item to cover the
work.
Change Order No. 2, (Incentive), in the amount of $5500 is for early final completion of
the project as outlined in the project contract documents. The contractor earned $5500
of a possible $6000 in incentives. They had the work adjacent to Transfiguration
School completed well before school started in the fall.
Change Order No. 3, (final recapitulation), is in the amount of $56,928.73. The original
contract amount is based on estimated quantities. The resulting amount of the
recapitulation is the result of the increases in some of the original contract quantities.
The sum of all the change orders is $84,488.63 or approximately 11 % of the total
construction cost of $761,433.86. The largest increases were due to:
1. Extra work requested by the St. Paul Water Utility and paid for by SPWU, but
managed under the city's contract with the contractor.
2. The addition of two sewer and water services for two separate property owners and
paid for under agreements with each property owner.
3. Additional sewer service repairs that were requested by residents and justified by
staff after the project began construction.
City Manager
Page 2
January 14, 2000
4. The discovery of unanticipated poor soils on various parts of the project required
increases in the quantities of excavation, additional replacement material and
additional pipe bedding.
5. Additional driveway pavement removed and replaced.
6.. Additional drainage pipe and drainage structures were determined to be necessary
after construction began.
7. It was determined during construction, that additional aggregate base was
necessary for the project. Material was used to improve the finished street section.
The contractor, Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. has completed all necessary work. The
final. payment is ready to be, released to Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. in the amount of
85,598.50.
Staff recommends that the city council direct the increase of the construction
contract in the amount of $84,488.63 by approving Change Orders 1,2 & 3 and
accept the construction contract as complete and final.
CIVIC
jt
Attachments
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered
made Improvement Project 98 -10, Harvester Area Neighborhood Street Improvements
and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified
and designated as Improvement Project 98 -10, Change Orders 1, 2 & 3.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Orders 1, 2 & 3
totaling an amount of $84,488.63. The revised contract amount is $761,433.86.
The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers
necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. The project budget is
increased by $84,488.63.
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that the
construction contract for the Harvester Area Neighborhood Street Improvements, City
Project 98 -10 is complete and recommends acceptance of the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 98 -10 is complete and maintenance of
these' improvements is accepted by the city. Release: of any retainage or escrow is
hereby authorized.
HARVESTER AREA STREETS
PROJECT 98 -10
PROJECT PAYMENT REQUEST
Estimate No. Final
Period Ending:December 1999
Contractor: Forest Lake Contracting, Inc.Contract Amount: $676,945.23
Item
Est.Qty.Unit
Description Unit Quant.To Date Price Total
2021.501 Mobilization (5% maximum)LS 1.00 1.00 33,000.00 33,000.00
2101.502 Clearing EACH 28.00 36.00 110.00 3,960.00
2101.507 Grubbing EACH 30.00 34.00 105.00 3,570.00
2104.501 Remove CMP storm sewer pipe LF 189.00 246.00 8.00 1,968.00
2104.501 Remove RCP storm sewer pipe LF 16.00 26.00 9.00 234.00
2104.505 Remove bituminous driveway pavement SY 1615.00 1710.90 2.00 3,421.80
2104.505 Remove concrete driveway pavement/apron/sidewalk SY 1205.00 1168.60 3.00 3,505.80
2104.509 Remove drainage structure EACH 2.00 2.00 225.00 450.00
2104.511 Sawing concrete pavement LF 672.00 270.50 3.50 946.75
2104.513 Saw bituminous driveway pavement LF 847.00 1270.00 2.30 2,921.00
2104.521 Salvage existing 60" chain -link fence and appurtenances LF 140.00 160.00 8.25 1,320.00
2104.525 Abandon existing MH (off SE comer Glendon & Michael LS 1.00 1.00 230.00 230.002104.601 Remove & dispose of rubber fire retaining wall LS 1.00 1.00 230.00 230.00
2104.601 Salvage clothes line poles @ 1001 Glendon St.LS 1.00 1.00 75.00 75.00
2104.604 Salvage brick pavers for driveway @ 987 Glendon St.SY 17.00 0.00 14.00 0.00
2104.606 Salvage wood timber trail border LF 40.00 20.00 3.50 70.00
2104.606 Abandon st sewer pipe (bulkhead & fill existing 24" RCP)LF 44.00 44.00 22.00 968.002105.501 Common exc. (see earthwork summary sheet), (P), (EV)CY 4676.00 6502.82 11.00 71,531.02
2105.507 Subgrade excavation (EV)CY 800.00 425.00 9.50 4,037.50
2105.515 Unclassified exc. (see earthwork summary sheet), (EV)CY 75.00 200.00 14:00 2,800.00
2105.522 Select granular borrow, CV CY 1384.00 0.00 14.00 0.00
2105.526 Select topsoil borrow, LV CY 1762.00 2154.00 7.00 15,078.00
2105.603 Clean existing ditch @ Century south of Brand LF 100.00 100.00 9.00 900.00
2105.604 Geotextile fabric, type 5, (minimum 38' wide)SY 844.00 844.00 - 1.00 844.00
2123.610 Street sweeper with pickup broom HR 16.00 39.25 90.00 3,532.502130.501 Water M GAL 155.00 90.00 17.00 1,530.00
2211.501 Aggregate base CI.5 for driveways and trails TON 309.00 66.38 15.00 995.70
2211.501 Aggr. base CI.6 under bit. drive or conc. walk or drive TON 943.70 909.40 11.25 10,230.75
2211.501 Aggregate base CI.6 for streets TON 1425.00 4235.20 7.50 31,764.00
2212.601 Aggregate base Cl 6 - 5" full depth reclamation SY 22870.00 23160.20 1.40 32,424.28
2232.501 Miff bituminous surface, 1.5" depth SY 192.00 223.00 7.50 1,672.50
2331.603 Bituminous joint saw and seal.LF 6760.00 3930.00 1.30 5,109.00
2340.508 Type 41 wearing course mixture (41 WEA50055PG58 -28)TON 1880.00 2219.35 29.00 64,361.15
2340.514 Type 32 base course mixture (32BBB50000PG58 28)TON 2830.00 2569.92 26.00 66
2340.518 Type 41 bituminous mixture for driveways TON 274.00 403.02 70.00 28,211.40
2357.502 Bituminous material for tack coat GAL 1200.00 1890.00 1.50 2,835.00
2503.603 Pipe bed. for 6 ", 12" or 15" st pipe @ st or driveway cross.LF 1345.00 1985.25 9.00 17,867.25
2503.603 Pipe bedding for 18" HDPE @ street or driveway crossing LF 75.00 28.00 9.00 252.00
2503.603 Pipe bedding for 6" PVC, Schedule 40 sanitary service LF 225.00 241.00 9.00 2,169.00
2501.515 Precast concrete headwall for 6" PVC (Mn/DOT Plate 3131 B)EA 3.00 4.00 225.00 900.00
2501.515 12" corr. HDPE pipe apron with safety grate EA 6.00 4.00 200.00 800.00
2501.515 15" corr. HDPE pipe apron with safety grate EA 4.00 4.00 215.00 860.00
2501.515 18" corr. HDPE pipe apron with safety grate EA 1.00 1.00 275.00 275.00
2503.511 6" storm sewer pipe (PVC Sch. 40 pipe or HDPE, smooth)LF 212.00 252.00 11.00 2,772.00
Harvester Area Streets, Project 98 -10
Page 2
Est.Qty.Unit
Item Description Unit Quant.To Date Price Total
2503.511 12" PVC, SDR35 pipe swr. (repair Q headwall s. side of school)LF 12.00 12.00 68.00 816.00
2503.511 12" corr. HDPE pipe sewer. smooth wall LF 3183.00 3272.00 11.00 35,992.00
2503.511 15" Con. HDPE pipe sewer, smooth wall LF 1310.00 1181.00 12.50 14,762.50
2503.511 18" corr. HDPE pipe sewer, smooth wall LF 470.00 644.00 15.00 9,660.00
2503.511 24" corr. HDPE pipe sewer, smooth wall (jacked carrier)LF 85.00 87.00 20.00 1,740.00
2503.602 6" saddle tap onto 8" VCP sanitary main EA 1.00 2.00 75.00 150.00
2503.603 6" DIP, Class 53 sanitary service LF 351.00 321.00 40.00 12,840.00
2503.603 6" PVC, Schedule 40 sanitary service LF 225.00 325.00 32.00 10,400.00
2503.603 Televise sanitary sewer main (clean & flush as directed)LF 7493.00 7493.00 0.40 2,997.20
2503.603 36" steel casing pipe (jacked)LF 64.00 64.00 240.00 15,360.00
2504.602 Adjust valve box, water EA 15.00 18.00 130.00 2,340.00
2504.602 Adjust curb stop box EA 13.00 13.00 35.00 455.00
2504.602 F & I curb box single lid cover EA 11.00 8.00 400.00 3,200.00
2504.603 Water utility service Iren ' h (exe. & backfill aQ 1030 Ferndale)LF 10.00 118.32 57.00 6.744.24
2504.604 F & I - 2" rigid insulation over water service or main SY 7.10 30.20 25.00 755.00
2506.602 F & I- 12" x 22.5 degree HDPE elbow EA 4.00 3.00 70.00 210.00
2506.602 F & 1 -12" x 45 degree HDPE elbow EA 6.00 9.00 80.00 720.00
2506.602 F & I -15" x 45 degree HDPE elbow EA 2.00 2.00 100.00 200.00
2506.602 F & I- 18" x 22.5 degree HDPE elbow EA 1.00 1.00 125.00 125.00
2506.602 F & I -12" HDPE vertical tap for grate on 18" fitting EA 3.00 0.00 250.00 0.00
2506.602 F & 1 -12" x 12" HDPE wye EA 1.00 2.00 135.00 270.00
2506.602 F & I -15" x 12' HDPE reducing wye EA 1.00 1.00 210.00 210.00
2506.602 F & 1 -15" x 15" HDPE wye EA 1.00 1.00 200.00 200.00
2506.602 F & I -15" x 12" HDPE reducer EA 5.00 6.00 80.00 480.00
2506.602 F & I -18" x 12" HDPE reducer EA 3.00 3.00 90.00 270.00
2506.602 F & I -18" x 15" HDPE reducer EA 3.00 3.00 90.00 270.00
2506.602 F & 1 -12" HDPE cross EA 1.00 0.00 160.00 0.00
2506.602 Const drain. struct. 12" HDPE tee w /fabric & HDPE drain grate EA 21.00 31.00 250.00 7,750.00
2506.602 Const drain. struct 15" x 12" HDPE tee w/fabric & HDPE drain grate EA 6.00 7.00 300.00 2,100.00
2506.602 Const. drain. struct. 18" x 12" HDPE tee w /fabric & HDPE drain grate EA 1.00 0.00 300.00 0.00
2506.602 Const drainage structure 18" HDPE tee w /fabric & HDPE drain grate EA 1.00 2.00 375.00 750.00
2506.602 Const. drainage structure 18" HDPE cross w/fabric & HDPE drain EA 1.00 1.00 400.00 400.00
2506.602 Const drain. struct 12" x 90 deg. HDPE elbow w /fabric & HDPE drain grate EA 21.00 18.00 235.00 4,230.00
2506.502 Const drainage structure 2'x 3' box CB w /R- 3067 -V casting EA 1.00 1.00 1,100.00 1,100.00
2506.502 Const drainage structure 48" CB w /salvaged R-3067 -V casting EA 1.00 1.00 1,300.00 1,300.00
2506.502 Consf drainage structure 72" MH w /R- 1422 -0004 cstg. & R -2422 -0009 lid EA 2.00 2.00 3,200.00 6,400.00
2506.601 Reline 8" outside drop to MH 40 -49 (see Maplewood Plate 421)LS 1.00 1.00 2,100.00 2,100.00
2506.602 Connect to existing drainage structure EA 2.00 1.00 225.00 225.00
2506.522 Adjust frame and ring casting EA 24.00 21.00 175.00 3,675.00
2511.502 Random Riprap, Class II TON 30.60 23.86 65.00 1,550.90
2511.515 Geotextile filter, Type III SY 36.00 35.00 4.00 140.00
2521.501 4" concrete walk SF 697.00 592.00 5.00 2,960.00
2531.501 Concrete curb and gutter, design Maplewood Plate 305 LF 16.00 16.00 50.00 800.00
2531.507 6" concrete driveway pavement, residential SY 962.00 1238.90 42.00 52,033.80
2531.604 Install salvaged brick pavers for driveway SY 17.00 0.00 42.00 0.00
2540.602 Reinstall mailbox support (salvaged)EA 18.00 20.00 35.00 700.00
2540.602 Furnish & install mailbox support (single)EA 48.00 49.00 75.00 3,675.00
Harvester Area Streets
Page 3
Item Description
2540.602 Fumish 5 install mailbox support (double)
2540.603 Reinstall salvaged wood timber trail border
2557.601 Reinstall salvage clothes line and poles @ 1001 Glendon
2557.603 Reinstall salvaged 60" chain-link fence and appurtenances
2563.601 Traffic control
2571.602 Rainwater garden preparallon
2571.602 Rock inMmtion sump for rainwater garden w/Type V geotextile fabric
2573.502 Sit fence, type preassembled maintained
2575.505 Sodding, type lawn
2575.523 Erosion control blanket, wood fiber Type IS
2575.525 Erosion stabilization blanket, type Enkamat or equal
2575.532 Commercial fertilizer Analysis 10 -10 -10
2575.555 Turf establishment (see erosion control plan sheet)
2575.601 Erosion control, contractors plan (1/2% min.)
733,873.96
Original contract amount
Plus Change Order 1
Plus Change Order 2 (incentives)
Plus Change Order 3 (Recapitulation)
Modified contract amount
Total eamed to date
Plus Change Order 1
Subtotal
Less 0% retainage
Plus incentive (Change Order 2)
Less liquidated damages
Subtotal
Less previous payments
Amount due this payment
Contractor t.
676.945.23
22,059.90
5.500.00
56.928.73
761,433.86
733.873.96
0.00
5,500.00
675,835.36
85.598.50
Date IA - S
Engineer ( -ool° 4C Y Date / - I'- t:10
Est.Qty.Unit
Unit Quant.To Date Price Total
EA 9.00 12.00 410.00 1,320.00
LF 40.00 0.00 11.00 0.00
LS 1.00 1.00 250.00 250.00
LF 120.00 130.00 11.00 1,430.00
LS 1.00 1.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
EACH 103.50 103.50 240.00 24.840.00
TON 230.00 191.86 50.00 9.593.00
LF 1800.00 1840.00 2.30 4.232.00
SY 19655.00 19955.00 2.00 39,910.00
SY 1100.00 720.00 1.85 1,332.00
SY 37.80 120.00 11.00 1.320.00
LB 902.00 1000.00 0.25 250.00
LS 1.00 1.00 1,500.00 1,500.00
LS 1.00 1.00 _3.400.00 3,400.00
733,873.96
Original contract amount
Plus Change Order 1
Plus Change Order 2 (incentives)
Plus Change Order 3 (Recapitulation)
Modified contract amount
Total eamed to date
Plus Change Order 1
Subtotal
Less 0% retainage
Plus incentive (Change Order 2)
Less liquidated damages
Subtotal
Less previous payments
Amount due this payment
Contractor t.
676.945.23
22,059.90
5.500.00
56.928.73
761,433.86
733.873.96
0.00
5,500.00
675,835.36
85.598.50
Date IA - S
Engineer ( -ool° 4C Y Date / - I'- t:10
CHANGE ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Project Name: Harvester Area Streets Change Order No.: 1
Project No.: 98 -10 Date: December 22, 1999
Contractor: Forest Lake Contracting, Inc.
The following changes shall be made in the contract documents:
Description
Work Order 1736
Work Order 1739
Work Order 1740
Sanitary sewer services
Work Order 1741
Work Order 1745
Work Order 2405
Work Order 2407
Work Order
Work Order 2409
Letter of November 5, 1999
Work Order 2325
Work Order 1798
Total
Original Contract:
Net Change of Prior Change
Order No. 0 to No. 0 :
Change This Change Order:
Revised Contract:
Total
800.00
2
907.51
2,717.00
689.13
1,875.92
631.47
3,395.56
1,813.09
1,467.22
826.98
2,565.87
1.854.85
22,059-90
676,945.23
N/A
22,059-90
699,005.13
Approved
Mayor
Approved
4
Agreed to by Contractor by
Engineer
Its_. -.___
Title
CHANGE ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Project Name: Harvester Area Streets Change Order No.: 2 (INCENTIVES)
Project No.: 98 -10 Date: December 22, 1999
Contractor: Forest Lake Contracting,Inc.
The following changes shall be made in the contract documents:
Unit
Description Unit uantit Price_ Total
Incentive for early final
completion (south side) Days.7 500.00 $3,500.00
Incentive for early final
completion (north side) Days 4 500.00 $2,000.00
Original Contract:676
Net Change of Prior Change
Order No. 0 to No. : 1 22,059.90
Change This Change Order:5
Revised Contract:704,505.13
Approved
Mayor
Approved
tngineer
Agreed to by Contractor by_
Its
Title
CHANGE ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Project Name: Harvester Area Streets Change Order No.: 3 ( Recapitulation )
Project No.: 98 -10 Date: December 22 1999
Contractor: Forest Lake Contracting, Inc.
The following changes shall be made, in the contract documents:
Description
Increases and decreases in quantities of some contract unit rice items (see appay
estimate).
Net change:56,928.73
Original Contract:676,945.23
Net Change of Prior Change
Order No. 0 to No. 2:27, 559.90
Change This Change Order:56,928.73
Revised Contract:761,433.86
Approved
Mayor
Appro
ngirleer,
Agreed to by Contractor by . V
Title
AGENDA ITEM K 2.
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modred
Rejected
SUBJECT: Approve budget for the Landscaping Phase of the Harvester Area
Neighborhood Streets, City Project 98 -10
DATE: January 14, 2000
The drainage improvements that were utilized on the Harvester Area Neighborhood
Streets Project were modeled after the innovative storm sewer design concepts of the
Birmingham Street project.
Landscaping has been proposed as an essential element of the Harvester Area
Neighborhood Streets project. Rainwater gardens have been utilized throughout much
of the project.
The difference being utilized on this project is that neighborhood residents have been
encouraged to take an active roll in the landscape process. Landscaping material will
be purchased from the Ramsey County Corrections Facility located on Lower Afton
Road. The planting work will be done by the neighborhood's residents and area
volunteers. Planting days will be scheduled for next spring.
By utilizing the Ramsey County workhouse and neighborhood volunteers, there will be a
significant cost savings for the project. It is also felt that neighborhood involvement will
be very important for the long -term success of the landscape project.
Maplewood's open space naturalist will be assisting the engineering department part -
time the preparation and planning of the project landscaping. It is proposed that a
not -to- exceed budget of $39,000 be established to cover cost of landscaping materials
and for staff time. The revised project financing is outlined on the next page.
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Finance Director to revise
the project budget in the amount of $39,000 for the landscaping phase of the
Harvester Area Neighborhood Streets, Project 98 -10.
jt
Attachment
Harvester Area Streets, Project `98 -10
Revised Project Costs:
Street & Stormcosts: $688.4"1
Subtotal after Construction Contract: $761
Est. Garden Plantings *: $ 13,000
Total Estimated Project: $774,434
EstimatedEstimated
4.1
Subtotal Total
Construct.
Sewer Fund costs:32,330
Soderbeck Agreement costs:2
Wettschreck Agreement costs:2,229
SPWU Agreement costs:3,510
State Aid Participating costs:32
Street & Stormcosts: $688.4"1
Subtotal after Construction Contract: $761
Est. Garden Plantings *: $ 13,000
Total Estimated Project: $774,434
Estimated Estimated
4.1
Eng, Admin Total Street &
Overhead Project Landscaa ina
10 42 4.1
702 2,932 0.3%
702 2 0.3%
1,106 4 0.4 %.
8,164 40 3.9
216 905,.349 87.2 %
237 999
26.000 39 3.8%
263 ,729 1,038,163 100.0%
Revised Financing:
Sewer Fund:42,500 4.1
State Aid Fund:40,800 3.9%
Assessments:482,400 46.5%
Soderbeck Agreement:2,900 0.3%
Wettschreck Agreement:2,900 0.3 %°
SPWU Agreement:4,600 0.4%
General Obligation:462 44.5°
Total Estimated Project:1,038,200 100.0%
AGENDA ITEM NO K3
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Community Development Director'ry &
SUBJECT: Spring Clean-Up 2000
DATE: January 10, 2000
INTRODUCTION
by Comte
Date.
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
After the 1999 . Spring Clean -Up was held last April, there were indications that we would hold
another this spring, but no definite decision was made. If we are to have another event, we must
start making plans as soon as possible.
BACKGROUND
The clean -up last spring was held as an alternative to the drop -off recycling center which was
closed. The drop -off center was closed due to illegal dumping, use by non - residents, and
escalating cost. The clean -up, which was free to residents, was paid for with money that had
been budgeted for the drop -off recycling center.
DISCUSSION
In Order to plan an event, we must know how the council would like it to be conducted, such as
what materials we take, date of the event, and most importantly, the funding.
Last year we took old appliances, electronics, tires, construction debris, old furniture, car parts,
scrap. metal and other assorted junk. Vasko, our city - contracted garbage hauler, which did the
event .last year, will not take brush, oil, antifreeze, paint, or hazardous waste. However, these
items can be taken to the Ramsey County drop off site at the fairgrounds.
Saturday, April 22, is open with Vasko, and there does not appear to be any special events
scheduled during the middle of the day at the community center (parking lot).
The last consideration is funding. There are three funding options. 1) The city could pay the
entire cost like last year, as funds for this have been budgeted. The cost last year was about
22,000. 2) The city could partially subsidize the event but have residents pay a reduced fee.
3) We could make the event self- supporting and have residents pay the full cost. Last year we
had over 650 participants. Turnout will likely depend on the amount we charge.
RECOMMENDATION
Council should direct staff as to how to proceed on this matter and if the April 22, 2000 date is
acceptable.
pAcom dvptlmisce111cleanup
G K-
Acton b Couftcill
Togethe. We. Can =
A en a
R E P O R T
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
to: City Manager
from: Colleen J. Dirkswager
subject: HRC - Request for Funds
date: January 18, 2000
Background.
The Maplewood Human Relations Commission is charged with improving the human relations
climate of our community by sponsoring community events throughout the City of Maplewood.
We have offered a number of educational in- service and enrichment programs both all
collaborative efforts with other entities. The have resulted in little community participation. We
would like to try a new approach this year. In our research efforts to expand our activities in
2000 we anticipate collaborative efforts with other City departments, the Maplewood Mail and the
school district. We would like to focus the "education ", "enrichment's programs around a venue
that would be inter - generational, attract a wade audience and benefit our climate through
entertainment. However, there are additional costs associated with undertaking such a venture.
Discussion:
Mixed Blood is a non - profit organization (5016) that specializes in theatrical performances
celebrating and educating communities on diversity. They perform at schools, corporations and
government agencies throughout the twin cities area and the nation. They have 24 years of
experience utilizing theater as a tool for encouraging ocial change and heightening awareness.g g g g
Again, one of the goals of the Human Relations Commission is to offer enrichment and
educational programs to increase community awareness of our diverse citizenry. We are utilizing
theater as a venue for creating a comfortable, entertaining way to learn about different cultures.
Mixed Blood Theater Company has developed these programs and support curriculum and could
tailor their performance to meet our needs.
The Human Relations Commission would like to schedule these performances around the city.
They would work with the existing city sites and schedules as well as the schedule of the theater
company to work out the specific details. The programs would begin this year in April, May, and
October of 2000 and continue through February of 2001. A. tentative schedule is outlined on
page two (2). Each of these performances coincides with a designated national or local cultural
celebration month,
Recommendation,
Support the Human Relation Commissions request of an amount not to exceed $3,000 from the
contingency account, to meet one of their objectives. Presenting Cultural Diversity Performing
Arts programs throughout the City of Maplewood will increase awareness and sensitivity in the
community to diversities and help build a supportive, peaceful community, through celebrating
our differences.
Cit Mana
Pa 2
Januar 18,, 2000
Below is are the estimated costs associated with the Human Relations Commission sponsorin
Mixed Blood performances and proposed schedule.
Sunda April 9,2000 Asian American Histor Mo.""
Eastern Parade Maplewood Mall 2:00 p.m.400.00
Cookies and Coffee 50.00
Sunda Ma 7,, 2000 Native American Histor Mo." 2:00 p.m.400.00
Accordin to Co MCC Ban Room/Council Chambers 200.00
Cookies a Coffee 50.00
Fall of 2000 Hispanic Herita Mo."
Minnecanos Carver Communit G 400.00
Cookies and Coffee 50.00
G Rental 80.00
Saturda Februar 17, 2001 African American Histor Mo."
Dau of Africa Ed Communit G 2:00 p.m.400.00
Cookies and Coffee 50.00
G Rental $40/hr 80.00
Promotion Fliers: Fliers with ISD 622 ($138.50 /ea.) $ 554.00
1/2 sheet, one-sided print, color flier)
Sub-Total $29714,00
Misc. Support Materials Posters $ 286.00
Fliers to distribute to Communit
Maplewood In Motion
Postcard Mailers & Posta
Insert in Maplewood Review
Other Facilit Rental (not outlined above)
Total Re - not to e=eed $3, 000.00
These fees are estimates,, however,, the total cost of the presentations will not exceed the total
re funds.
AGENDA ITEM NO K 5 - -- - --.-
AGENDA
0To. City Mana
From. Colleen J. Dirkswa
Sub Charitable Gamblin
Date: Januar 18, 2000
Action b Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Re
On ftil 26. 1999 the Cit Council approved a Charitable Gamblin Re b the Senior0iibicalDependencProfor $3,000 towards a Public Address s Since the approval
Senior Chemical Dependenc Pro has had • some chan in their needs. The would like
to, maintain the funds and reallocate where the are spent. Attached for your review and
consideration is the re from Muriel O'Neill with the Senior Chemical Dependenc Program.
SER
Senior Chemical Dependency Program
1351 Frost Avenue • St. Paul, MN 55109
651)773 -0473
January 13, 2000
TO: Colleen Dirkswager
City of Maplewood
FROM: Muriel O'Neill,, Director
Senior Chemical Dependency Program
1351 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
RE: $3,,000 Grant from Charitable Gambling Funds
First of all, I want to thank the City of Maplewood for awarding the Senior
Chemical Dependency Program $3,000. It is deeply appreciated and greatly
needed.
Circumstances have changed for us since we sent in our application. At that
time, we knew we had to relocate and were making efforts to get a facility
that had a large meeting -room . With this in mind and the deadline for the
grant application approaching, we assumed we would need a sound system
to effectively utilize the anticipated large room. After much work and
effort, we are finally settled in a lovely location at 1351 Frost Avenue.
However, we were not able to have our dreamed of large meeting room.
We respectfully request that we be allowed to use the $3,000 for other needs.
We desperately need a new copier and an additional computer and printer.
Estimates run as follows:
1350 - $1400 Cost of copier.
1600 - Cost of a computer and color printer.
Hopefully this will meet with your. approval. We shall be waiting to hear
from you in regard to this matter.
AGENDA ITEM 9 ' 0 (0
Action by Council
AGENDA REPORT
Date
Endorsed
ModifiedTO: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager Rejected
FROM: Michael A. Ericson, Assistant to the Ci ty - rMana
RE: Ramsey/Washington Suburban Cable Commission Resolution Opposingppg
State Legislation to Eliminate Franchising Authority
DATE: January 18, 2000
INTRODUCTION
The City of Maplewood received a memo from the Ramsey/Washington Suburban Cable
Commission requesting the city to support its resolution opposing proposed state legislationgppg
which would eliminate municipal franchising authority. A resolution of support from the citywouldbesharedwithourarealegislatorsifthecouncilsupportedthecommissionsposition.
BACKGROUND
The franchising authority of the commission allows for the City f Maplewood and memberYp s of
the commission to control regulatory and franchising fees. Proposed state legislationpg
SF213 3/HF213 7 would abolish Chapters 23 7 and 23 8 of Minnesota Statutes and regulate cableble
systems and common carriers. If eliminated, the state would take over control of the cable
television franchise. The commission firmly states that the o osed legislation does notppg
adequately address Open Access, protection against red lining, local infrastructure to addressdress
service complaints, destruction of existing contracts or agreements, institutional networks or
PEG programming. '
RECOMMENDATION
The city council should support the resolution from Ramsey/Washington Suburban Cable
Commission regarding its opposition to proposed state legislation to eliminate municipalgicipalfranchisingauthorityanddirectstafftosendaresolutionofsupporttolocallegislators.pp g slators.
1 1
7 ,J
Memorand AcmA nEm NO
December 23, 1999
Action by" . Council
Date
TO: MEMBER MUNICIPALITIES Endorsed
Modred
FROM: Tim Finnerty Rejected
RE: Adoption of Resolution
Please find enclosed a copy of a Resolution which was recently adopted by the
Ramsey /Washington Counties Suburban Cable Communications Commission in
response to proposed State legislation which, if adopted, would effectively eliminate
municipal franchising authority and transfer regulatory functions and franchise fees
to the State. Local provisions like access channels and I -Nets would also be
eliminated.
It is the Commission's intent to also share this Resolution with legislators
representing areas served by the Commission. Further, the Commission recommends
that your municipality adopt the Resolution and also provide it to such legislators. If
your municipality does adopt it, please forward a copy to the Commission.
Please feel free to contact me if you should have any questions regarding this
Resolution or the legislative proposal in questions.
cc: Directors
R/ WSCC 7245 Stillwater Blvd. North, Oakdale, MN 55128 Phone: 651- 779 -7144 Fax: 651- 779 -8990
SOLUTION NO. 11- 18 -99 -01
WHEREAS, the Ramsey/Washington Counties Suburban Cable Communications
Commission ( "Commission ") has been granted the legal authority to negotiate, award
and regulate cable television franchises under both Federal Telecommunications Act
FTA ") Title VI and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238; and
WHEREAS, Commission has regulated its cable television franchise responsibly
and reasonably, including ensuring that the cable company meets the identified
needs of the community such as community television and institutional networks
and serving as a local resource to resolving customer service issues; and
WHEREAS, proposed State legislation, SF213 3/HF213 7, would abolish Chapters
237 and 238 of Minnesota Statutes and regulate cable systems and common carriers
the same. The proposed legislation will revoke Commission's authority to award
cable television franchises, eliminate the Commission as a local resource to its
citizens, and remove the Commission's ability to receive direct support for
community television and other provisions that meet community needs; and
WHEREAS, cable systems providing cable service are regulated differently than
common carriers under existing Federal and State law. Common carriers are
regulated under Title II of the FTA and Chapter 237 of Minnesota Statutes. Cable
systems are regulated under Title VI of the FTA and Chapter 238 of Minnesota
Statutes; and
WHEREAS, there is no need for the proposed legislation, and no other State has
enacted such legislation. It has not been demonstrated by any means that local
governments' role in cable franchising impedes in any manner the ability of cable and
telecommunications companies to offer full and competitive services; and
WHEREAS, the proposed legislation will violate the purpose of the FTA of
establishing franchise procedures and standards which encourage the growth and
development of cable systems and which assure that cable systems are responsive
to the needs and interests of the local community. Nor will it promote competition in
cable communications and minimize unnecessary regulation that would impose an
undue economic burden on cable systems. The proposed legislation would actually
increase regulation forcing the Department . of Commerce and the Public Utilities
Commission to regulate cable, even though these agencies have little or no
experience in regulating the cable industry; and
WHEREAS, the State would be better served by relevant legislation that would
clarify existing inconsistencies between the FTA and Chapter 238. For example, the
provisions in Chapter 238 relating to the review period for transfers is inconsistent
with the 120 day review period requirement under the FTA. The State could also
study the Open Access issue to determine if cable operators should open their lines
to non - proprietary Internet Service Providers on a non - discriminatory state -Wide basis;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed legislation will have a negative financial impact on
municipalities and citizens throughout the State. The infrastructure to regulate cable
operators is already in place at the. local level and is extremely effective. The
proposed legislation would destroy the existing infrastructure and replace it with a
cumbersome, expensive administrative agency at the State level; and
WHEREAS, the proposed legislation does not adequately address Open Access,
protection against redlining, local infrastructure to address service complaints,
destruction of existing contracts or agreements, Institutional Networks, or PEG
proms' g•
WHEREAS, the Commission has expended considerable time and resources
negotiating a new cable franchise that meets the 'community's` needs. The proposed
legislation will violate the due process and contract clauses of the U.S. and State
Constitutions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The Commission has a significant interest in retaining its ability to franchise
companies providing cable television services and is hereby opposed to any
legislation that would revoke this authority, and that it further asserts its
Constitutional rights to retain its local authority to enter into contracts to serve
its community.
2. That any legislation eliminating Chapter 238 at this time is premature. The
Commission respectfully requests the State Legislature to carefully study the
dynamics of federal and state cable regulation prior to passing any new
legislation.
3. The Commission respectfully requests the State Legislature to include the
Commission, the League of Minnesota Cities, and MACTA in all discussions
and hearing concerning cable regulation
ADOPTED this 13th day of December,
ul
maidwal6i
Its: Chairman
Resolution 12- 13 -99 -01, page 2
0
y e
BOB FLETCHER
RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF
14 W. Kellogg Boulevard v
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 -1648
Telephone: (651) 266 -9300
Telefacsimile: (651) 266 -9328 F
Honorable Maplewood City Councilmembers
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood City Hall
Maplewood, Mn 55109
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,
oQ pTECT
SER
January 24, 2000
It is my understanding that Councilmember Collins has requested that the issue of Emergency Radio
Dispatching be placed on the agenda for tonight's meeting. I have not been contacted by
Councilmember Collins nor have I received a request to be present or provide any information that
may bear upon that decision, so I am forwarding this letter to provide you, some thoughts on the
issue.
In short, it is my belief that the dispatch merger is working well and has provided an increased level
of public safety to Maplewood residents. I have attached a copy of an earlier letter articulating this
view. That said, I am prepared to provide you any objective information that you may need to further
discuss this issue. Ultimately, I believe your decision will evolve around three options:
Option ##1 Continue Contracting with the Sheriffs Department for Dispatching Service
The Ramsey County Sheriffs Department is currently providing the -dispatching service to the
Maplewood Police and Fire Departments for an annual cost of $183,619. This provides for dedicated
fire dispatching and 4 - 7 dispatchers on duty at any given time with heavier staffing during tunes
when calls for service are typically greater. The dispatching technology is up to date and there have
been several examples during the past year when the citizens of Maplewood were better served by
having numerous dispatchers to handle the multiple aspects of dispatching an emergency call.
Option #2 Return to Maplewood Dispatching with Previous Staffing Level
If the City of Maplewood were to return to dispatching at the former staffing level of six dispatchers,
serious public safety concerns would arise. This staffing level regularly allowed for only one
dispatcher to be on duty. Any number of single events can arise which requires several dispatchers
to coordinate the response. In addition, often times more than one emergency call for service is
received at a time. Additionally, this option represents an increase in operational costs of
approximately $75,000, not including supervision of the function.
ADULT DETENTION DIVISION (651) 266 -9350 • CIVIL PROCESS (651) 266 -9330 • PATROL DIVISION (651) 481 -1317 • WARRANTS (651) 266 -9320
C,
AFSCME
WgMAABEI
Option #3 Return to Maplewood Dispatchin with Appropriate Staffin Levels
Adequate Public safety emergency dispatchin could be provided b the Cit of Maplewood if there
was a commitment to staff the Maplewood Communication Center at the appropriate level. At a
minimum, two dispatchers would need to be on dut at all times. Durin peak weekend evenin
hours, three dispatchers are necessar This option would re the hirin of at least eleven
dispatchers at an annual cost of $477,400. Supervision costs would be over and above this fi gure.
Additionall under Options #2 and #3, much of the Co " iunications e owned b the Cit
of Maplewood would need to be replaced as it is anti inoperable or incompatible with the
Computer Aided Dispatch s It is estimated that properl e the old Maplewood
Dispatch Center with the necessar capital up would cost $266,000.
Referendum
If the course which i's chosen relates to options 2 or 3, 1 recommend an advisor referendum to allow
the citizens a voice in this important public safet issue. This process could also foster greater
discussion on the lar scale issues related to the safet and efficienc concerns that a fra
dispatch s creates. In either case, the Ramse Count Sheriffs Department will assist the Cit
of Maplewood as necessar If you have an questions or if I can be of further assistance, please feel
free to contact me or Undersheriff Dave Metusalem at 651- 266 -9311.
Sincerely ,
00
900 "41Z J
Bob Fletcher
Sheriff, Ramse County
BOB FLETCHER EC TQapTT 8 SFR
RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF 40
14 W. Kellogg Boulevard ` €
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 -1648
Telephone: 651 266- 9300
Telefacsimile: (651) 266 - 9328
Dear Maplewood Resident,
On September 29, 1999 at 6:48 p.m. two car loads of Asian gang members conduct a drive by shooting at
the Edgerton Elementary School in Maplewood. A young man without gang. affiliation is shot and killed
while playing basketball. A few seconds after the. shooting a young girl dials 911, she reaches a dispatcher
at the Ramsey County Emergency Communication Center and reports the following:
I'm calling because a friend of mine just got shot right now -we're at
Edgerton Elementary. We were playing basketball and someone drove by and
they just shot at us. "
The six dispatchers on duty at the Communication Center spring into action and within the next few seconds
several simultaneous functions take place.
The initial dispatcher continues to talk to the caller getting essential information on
the type of injury and description of the two suspect vehicles and their occupants.
A second dispatcher notifies the Maplewood Police squad cars and they begin
responding.
Additional calls come into the Communication Center from other witnesses and
callers and are handled by other dispatchers.
The suspect vehicle information is given to the dispatcher for Little Canada and
Roseville. She dispatches it to other Sheriffs Department and Roseville
squad cars.
Another dispatcher dispatches the Maplewood Fire Ambulance.
As Maplewood and Sheriffs Department squads arrive, additional information,
coordination and dissemination is performed by the primary dispatcher.
An electronic mobile data message is sent to all squad cars on the Ramsey County -
St. Paul data system. The Minnesota Asian Gang Strike Force is contacted and
requested to assist at the scene.
A phone call is made from the Ramsey County Communication Center to the St.
Paul Police Communication Center advising them of the suspect description.
ADULT DETENTION DIVISION (651) 266 -9350 - CIVIL PROCESS (651).266-9330 - PATROL DIVISION (651) 481 -1317 - WARRANTS (651) 266 -9320
AFSCME
uw.w.e , .
i
An off duty officer working at Target in St. Paul monitors the radio broadcast and
advises the Communication Center that he had seen the suspect vehicles. earlier in
the evenin g gatTarget and because of their suspicious activity had recorded the
correct license plates. He transmits the information to the Minnesota Asian Gang
Strike Force who successfully arrest and charge the suspects.
This incident is just one more example of how. important it is to have adequate staffing in a 911
Emergency Communication Center during a critical incident. The consolidated radio dispatch program
has resulted in 6 or 7 dispatchers able to handle. emergency incidents rather than the previous 1 or 2 at
the stand alone Maplewood Center. The merger of the Communication Centers has resulted in a much
safer and efficient dispatcher function.
Recently, Maplewood Fire Chief Joel Hewitt told the Review Newspaper that the new dispatch
arrangement has been working great. He was quoted as saying:
They're providing everything we need. It's a great improvement. The
communications being provided are essential to the welfare of both the citizens and
firefighters of Maplewood. I would not support the proposition of returning to our own
center."
On October L1999, Maplewood Police Chief Don Winger wrote a memo to the Maplewood City Council
regarding the merger. In his conclusion he wrote:
Two former Maplewood dispatchers have made the statement that this is the best
thing that we have ever done. Both comments were unsolicited. One of the comments
was made at - a public meeting with about 100 people in attendance. At this point I
agree with that assessment and we will continue to make this transition complete."
Having spent most of my life living in Maplewood, I want to assure you, as I have my own folks on Atlantic
Street, that the 911 emergency service that you receive is the finest there is. It has already resulted in more
efficient Police. responses and I am confident that it will save lives because of the adequate resources
available in an emergency.
There are of course a few people who choose to criticize the consolidation and demagogue the issue for
personal gain. Amazingly enough, those persons have never visited our Communication Center to watch
the operation. I encourage you to get the facts from users such as your Police and Fire Chiefs or the Police
and Fire chiefs of the other eleven cities that we serve.
If you have additional questions, or would like to take a tour of the Ramsey County Sheriffs Office 911
Emergency Communication Center, please call me at 266 -9333. I am confident you will be impressed withgY
the dispatching service provided to the City of Maplewood.
Sincerely,
Bob Fletcher
Ramsey County Sheriff