HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998 06-08 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, June 8, 1998
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 98 -12
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting 98 -11 (May 21, 1998)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. PRESENTATIONS
1. Planning Commission Appointments
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will
be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Final Payment - Skillman Overlay - Project 97 -08
3. Re- establishment of the Nature Center Undesignated Capital Outlay Account
4. Funding for Kohlman Overlook Park Project completion (landscaping)
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M.: AT &T Monopole (1905 County Road D East)
Conditional Use Permit
Design Approval
2. 7:15 P.M.: Hermanson Dental Labs (1055 Highway 36 East)
Conditional Use Permit
Design Approval
3. 7:30 P.M.: Metcalf Mayflower Billboard (1255 Highway 36 East)
Conditional Use Permit Request
I. AWARD OF BIDS
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Carey Addition (Carey Heights Drive, South of County Road D) -4 votes
Land Use Plan Change (R -1 to R -1 S)
Zoning Map Change (R -1 to R -1 S)
Preliminary Plat Revision
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Funding for Northeast Suburban Transit Commission
2. Establishment of a Park Development Fund Account
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Committee Reports
2.
191
13
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Storm Damage Update
i
G
O. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Thursday, May 21, 1998
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 98 -11
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers,
Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Rossbach.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
George F. Rossbach, Mayor Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present
Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present
Kevin Kittridge, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Council/Manager Workshop of May 4, 1998
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Council /Manager Workshop of
May 4. 1998 as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
2. Minutes of Special Council Meeting 498 -09 (May 11, 1998)
Mayor Rossbach moved to approve the minutes of Special Council Meeting No. 98 -09 (May
11, 1998) as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
3. Minutes of Regular Council Meeting 498 -10 (May 11, 1998)
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the minutes of Regular Council Meeting No. 98 -10
(Mav 11. 1998) as corrected.
Seconded by Mayor Rossbach Ayes - all
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
M1 Stop Sign
M2 Toyota
M3 Open Space
M4 Mayor's Mailbox
N1 Police Chief Selection
5 -21 -98
N2 Storm Clean -Up
N3 Planning Commission Interview
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach
F
Ayes - all
Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption.
98 -05 -50
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR BUNNY BRUEGGEMAN
WHEREAS, Alexandra `Bunny" Brueggeman has been a member of the Maplewood Planning
Commission since October 9, 1995 and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has appreciated her experience, insights and good judgment
WHEREAS, she has freely given of her time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment
of the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, she has shown sincere dedication to her duties and has consistently contributed her
leadership, time and effort for the benefit of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota and its citizens, that Alexandra "Bunny" Brueggeman is hereby extended our heartfelt
gratitude and appreciation for her dedicated service, and we wish her continued success in the future.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
G. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Koppen moved, seconded by Councilmember Allenspach: aves - all, to approve the
Consent Agenda, Items Gl thru G5, as recommended.
1. Approval of Claims
Approved the following claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 159,484.09 Checks #7486 - #7503 dated 5 -1 -98 thru 5 -8 -98
$ 233,346.25 Checks #37678 - #37766 dated 5 -12 -98
$ 16,071.40 Checks #7504 - #7507 dated 5 -13 -98 thru 5 -14 -98
$ 131,490.21 Checks #37775 - #37896 dated 5 -19 -98
$ 540,391.95 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL:
$ 303,481.29 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 5 -1 -98
$ 49,027.17 Payroll Deduction Checks #65260 - #65274 dated 5 -1 -98
$ 352,508.46 Total Payroll
5 -21 -98
$ 892.900.41 GRAND TOTAL
2. Budget Change
Approved a budget transfer from the General Fund contingency account to finance the
modification of accounting and payroll software for the Year 2000.
3. Final Plat - Oak Ridge Estates, Third Addition
Approved the Oak Ridge Estates, Third Addition final plat.
4. Ramsey County Cooperative Agreement, Century Ave. Improvements
Authorized execution of the agreement with Ramsey County for Century Avenue
improvements, Project #95 -11.
5. Emergency Vehicle Preemption, McKnight & Conway and McKnight & 3M Dr.
Authorized execution of the proposal with Short- Elliot- Hendrickson for emergency vehicle
preemption.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. (7:10): Carey Addition (Carey Heights Drive)
Land Use Plan Change (R -1 to R -2)
Zoning Map Change (R -1 to R -2)
Preliminary Plat Revision
a. Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the land use plan
change, zoning map change and preliminary plat revision for the Carey Heights Drive
development.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Jack Frost presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following people were heard:
Bob Cardinal, 761 Iowa Avenue East, St. Paul
Rich Pearson, 2990 Carey Heights Drive
Pam Krahmer, 2999 Carey Heights Drive
Bob DeYoung, 2964 Carey Heights Drive
f Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Koppen moved to deny the request for the following reasons:
1. The density would be too high for the area.
2. The terrain is too steep from County Road D up to the first residence.
3. It would not be consistent with existing zoning and land use.
4. The impact of increased densities and small lot sizes are a concern.
Seconded by Mayor Rossbach.
3
5 -21 -98
Motion withdrawn by Councilmember Koppen.
h. Councilmember Kittridge moved to table until June 8. 1998, to allow the developer to
research other development options.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen. Ayes - all
2. 7:20 P.M. (8:03): Conditional Use Permit - Heavy Commercial Vehicle Storage
562 Ferndale St.
a. Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a conditional use
permit allowing a heavy commercial vehicle on the property at 562 Ferndale Street.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Jack Frost presented the Planning Commission report.
e. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings.
f Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following people were heard:
Wayne Reitberger, 562 Ferndale Street
Rita Hochban, 2634 Fremont Avenue
Marge Zabel, 2648 5th Street
Wayne Reitberger, 562 Ferndale Street (second appearance)
Claudia Jensen, 2627 Fremont Avenue
g. Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing.
h. Councilmember Kittridge introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption:
98 -05 -51
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION - HEAVY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE STORAGE AND
PARKING
WHEREAS, Wayne Reitberger is requesting that Maplewood approve a conditional use permit to
store and park a heavy commercial vehicle (semi - tractor truck) on his property at 562 Ferndale Street.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 562 Ferndale Street. The legal description is:
The South 10 feet of Lot 3 and the North' /2 of Lot 4, Block 6, Farrell's Addition in Section 36,
Township 29, Range 22. (PIN 36- 29 -22 -14 -0028)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
On May 4, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended thatthe City Council approve
this permit.
2. On May 21, 1998, the City Council held apublic hearing. The city staff published anotice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at
the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approves this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
5 -21 -98
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause anuisance to
any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or
air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference
or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The owner or operator of the truck doing the following:
a. Residing on the property.
b. Parking the truck in an enclosed structure or on a hard surface driveway that meets the
applicable zoning district requirements.
c. Not parking the truck on the street.
d. Not parking or storing any commercial trailers on the property or on the street.
2. The owner or operator shall not let the vehicle's engine idle for more than thirty (30) minutes
in any one (1) hour period. In no circumstances may the owner or operator idle the engine
for more than two periods, lasting thirty (30) minutes each, in one twenty -four (24) hour
period. There shall not be any engine idling that disturbs the neighbors between 9 p.m. and 7
a.m.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The owner /operator shall use the shortest route through the neighborhood to get to the
residence.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
I. AWARD OF BIDS
NONE
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NONE
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. 1999 -2003 Capital Improvement Plan
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
5
5 -21 -98
b. Finance Director Faust presented the specifics of the report.
c. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption:
98 -05 -52
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1999 -2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the 1999 -2003 Capital Improvement Plan coordinates the timing and financing of major
equipment purchases and construction projects, and
WHEREAS, the 1999 -2003 C.I.P. is a planning tool for City staff and elected officials, and
WHEREAS, it is important to follow the construction and financing schedule on pages 1 -8 and 1 -9
in the C.I.P. in order to fully utilize the City's engineering staff and minimize the need for consultant
engineers, and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, thatthe 1999 -2003 C.I.P. is hereby adopted as aplanning
document, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the construction and financing schedule on pages 1 -8 and 1 -9 inthe
C.I.P. will be followed to the greatest extent possible.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
2. N.S.P. Energy Loan
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
b. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this
matter. The following person was heard:
Rick Anderson, Environment and Energy Resource Center, explained the Co-
Ray -Vac system.
c. Councilmember Kittridge
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
NONE
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
MI. Stop Signs
Ayes - Councilmembers Koppen, Carlson,
Allenspach, Kittridge.
Nays - Mayor Rossbach
Councilmember Kittridge extended thanks from citizens to staff for the Linwood and
Sterling stop sign that was installed.
M2. Maplewood Toyota
Mayor Rossbach relayed residents' complaints about on- street unloading of vehicles at
6
5 -21 -98
Maplewood Toyota.
M3. Open Space
Discussion regarding the former Open Space Committee and points used to grade properties.
M4. Mayor's Mailbox
Mayor Rossbach informed Council that he presented Hill- Murray High School, winner ofthe
Diversity Award, with a check for $500.
Mayor Rossbach informed Council of upcoming meetings, including the Mayor's Forum on
June 6 at Station #4, Londin Lane, 10:00 a.m. to Noon.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
Nl. Police Chief Commission
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the scheduled meeting to meetthe candidates
for the position of Police Chief on June 3, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. at the Maplewood Community
Center.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen. Ayes - all
N2. Storm Clean -Up
City Manager McGuire reported on the progress of the clean -up from the storm. The City
will continue curb pick -up until Tuesday, May 26.
N3. Planning Commission Interviews
There are three individuals recommended for openings on the Planning Commission.
Interviews will be held on June 1 at the Council/Manager Workshop.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rossbach moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 p.m.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
5 -21 -98
Agenda Item F1
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Melinda Coleman, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
DATE: June 2,1998
INTRODUCTION
Action by Councilor
Endorse
Modifie
Rejecte
Date
The planning commission has two vacancies created by the resignations of Bunny Brueggeman
and Kevin Kittridge. These terms end on December 31, 1998 and December 31, 2000
respectively. City staff has run several advertisements requesting applicants for these
vacancies. We received five applications to fill the vacancies.
BACKGROUND
The planning commission's rules of procedure state that the commission shall recommend
candidates based on qualifications and a representative geographical distribution of members.
Staff ran notices in the April and May issues of Maplewood In Motion to recruit applicants for the
planning commission.
COMMISSION ACTION
On May 18, 1998, the planning commission interviewed and voted on the candidates listed
below for the two vacancies on the commission. I have listed the applicants in order of
preference as the planning commission recommended.
Dale Trippler
Michael Seeber
Paul Mueller
Paul Maeyaert
Gordon Heininger
DISCUSSION
On June 1, 1998, the council interviewed the top three vote getters (Mr. Trippler, Mr. Seeber and
Mr. Mueller) from the planning commission meeting to fill the two vacancies. After doing the
interviews, the council picked Mr. Trippler and Mr. Seeber to serve on the planning commission.
RECOMMENDATION
Appoint Mr. Seeber to serve on the planning commission through December 2001 and
Mr. Trippler to serve on the planning commission through December 2000.
p. /misc/pcappt -2. mem
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MAY 18 1998
VI. NEW BUSINESS - Continued
C. Planning Commission Vacancy Interviews
Ken Roberts, associate planner,. reported that the Planning Commission has two vacancies
because of the resignations of Bunny Brueggeman and Kevin Kittridge. Staff received a total I of
five applications. Staff said that four of the five applicants were present. Mr. Heinin er one ne of
the applicants, could not make the meeting because of an emergency in the family. The
commissioners conducted interviews with the four applicants present and filled out a ballot for
each applicant, ranking them from 1 through 5, 5 being the most favorite, etc.
The applicants were ranked as follows, the first applicant had the most votes and so on:
Dale Trippler
Michael Seeber
Paul Mueller
Paul Maeyaert
Gordon Heininger
AGENDA NO. G -1
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council,
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: June 1, 1998
Endorse
Modifie -
Rejecte
Date
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$40,666.40
Checks #7508 thru #7516 d - - _
dated 5 15 98 thru 5 22 -98
$157,153.74
Checks #37899 thru #38013 dated
$2,878.11
Checks #7517 thru #7520 dated 5-26-98 _ _
6 98 thru 5 29 98
$ 273, 16 1.01
Checks #38018 thru #38104 dated -
6 2 -98
$473,859.26 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL:
$292,473.83 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits p its dated 5-29-98
$18,785.36 Payroll Deduction check #65668 _
thru #65682 dated 5-29-98
$311,259.19 Total Payroll
$785,118.45 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Plea _ •
Please call me at 770 4513 if you have an
questions on the attached listing. This will allow m y
e to check the supporting documentation on
file if necessary.
rb
Attachments
PARNANCEIWRAGMAPPRUM0 JUN
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 1
05/22/98 09:47
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
7508
05/15/98
190400
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES
DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE
1
1
7509
05/18/98
762675
RUHLAND, ROBERT
SMALL LIABILITY CLAIMS
245.05
245.05
7510
05/18/98
190150
DEHN, DEBBIE
SUPPLY REIMBURSEMENT -EAGLE PRO
128.01
128.01
7511
05/19/98
341706
HERITAGE BANK
US SAVINGS BONDS
500.00
500.00
7512
05/19/98
550150
MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION
A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE
141.76
141.76
7513
05/20/98
722 200
P. E . R . A .
PERA DED FAY - KOPPEN
16.29
PERA CONTRIB- KOPPEN
16.29
32.58
7514
05/20/98
722200
P.E.R.A.
PERA DEDUCTION PAYABLE
15
PERA CONTRIBUTIONS
19
34,784.83
7515
05/21/98
541400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
APRIL SURTAX
2
APRIL SURTAX
52.36 -
2,565.17
7516
05/22/98
190400
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES
DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE
942.00
942.00
37899
05/26/98
BAO XIONG
GARDEN PLOTS REFUND
32.00
32.00
37900
05/26/98
DEBRA SINGLETARY
YOUTH SOCCER
25.00
KNOT HOLE
25.00
50.00
37901
05/26/98
KERRI NIKOLAS- JENSEN
4TH BEG. TENNIS
30.00
30.00
3790
05/26/98
CATHERINE STAHN
SWIM REFUND
76.00
76.00
37903
05/26/98
TERRY LIJEWSKI
3M PRO -RATED MEMBERSHIP
157.44
157.04
37904
05/26/98
MEDICA CHOICE REFUNDS
REF. INS. F18744
286.64
286.64
379
05/26/98
PING WANG
HORSEBACK CAMP, MN MAGIC I,II
200.00
200.00
77906
05/26/98
JENNIFER WEI
MN MAGIC I,II
100.00
100.00
.37907
05/26/98
STEVEN HOKANSON
POP -UP T -BALL
30.00
30.00
3791 =�8
05/26/98
(
ALCA CORPORATION
SHAFTS
62.83
62.83
37909
05/26/98
010900
ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC
STORM SEWER REPAIRS PROJ.98 -02
2,714.00
2_,714.00
3 7910 �
05/ 26 /98
090
ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC
REPLACE BALLAST & TRAIL LIGHT.
493 . 00
493 . 00
:J7911
c i5/ 26 /98
0217 00
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
GASOLINE
66.17
66. 17
37912
05/26/98
030460
ANDERSON, MICHAEL
BOOKING FEES- STONEY LONESOME CONCERT
200.00
200.00
37913
05/26/98
03 0660
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
ANIMAL CONTROL 5/11 -5/15
1,026.50
1,026.50
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 2
05122198
09:47
VOUCHER /CHECK; REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER /
CHECK:
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK:
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
37914
05/26/98
030730
ANOKA HENNEPIN TECH COLLEGE
FIRE GROUND COURSE
150.00
150.00
37915
05/26/98
060100
BCA /TRAINING &DEVELOPMENT
DEATH SCENE INV. COURSE
80.00
80.00
37916
05/26/98
060500
BAILEY NURSERIES, INC.
TREE VARIETIES
3
TREE VARIETIES
315.24
3
37917
05/26/98
061906
BAUER BUILT
TIRES
52.21
52.21
37918
05/26/98
071500
BIG BOB'S RPR SHOP & SONS, INC
P.D. DOOR REPAIR
84.00
84.00
37919
05/26/98
080925
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
1830
48.60
1902
18.00
1177
5.40
1530
18.00
2501
5.40
63
5.40
1685
5.40
1845
5.07
1980
75.07
2100
755.94
942.28
37920
05/26/98
081250
BRAD RAGAN INC.
INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES
613.44
613.44
37921
05/26/98
110500
CARSONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP.
FLEX. FENCE POST
454.34
454.34
37922
05/26/98
110850
CATCO
PARTS FOR EQUIP.
472.60
CREDIT FOR RETURNED PARTS
85.20-
387.40
37923
05/26/98
140700
COLEMAN, MELINDA
TELEPHONE CALLS
32.51
32.51
37924
05/26/98
152410
COPY SERVICE CORP.
CASSETTTE BODY
47.93
47.93
37925
05/26/98
170250
CUSTOM FIRE
ELKHART MASTER STREAM DEVICES
3
3
37926
05/26/98
170260
CUSTOM HEADSETS, INC.
TELEPHONE HEADSET
280.83
280.83
37927
05/26/98
170900
D & D TOWING SERVICE INC.
TOW FOR SUICIDE VICTIM VEHICLE
102.93
102.93
��7928
05/26/98
180985
DANK:O EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO.
MIN. BILLING /USAGE BILLING
80.20
MIN. BILLING /USAGE BILLING
80.20
MIN. BILLING /USAGE BILLING
2.64
MIN. BILLING /USAGE BILLING
103.62
MIN. BILLING /USAGE BILLING
215.88
MIN. BILLING /USAGE BILLING
191.86
MIN. BILLING /USAGE BILLING
45.74
MIN. BILLING /USAGE BILLING
88.25
MIN. BILLING /USAGE BILLING
214.56
MIN. PILLING /USAGE BILLING
177.70
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
12 , { �08. 50
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
987.
14,196.15
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 3
05/22/98
09:47
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
37929
05/26/98
181375
DARE AMERICA MERCHANDISE
TOTE BAG, PAPER CLIP DISP.
422.85
SALES TAX PBL. OUT OF STATE
23.57-
399.28
37930
05/26/98
190250
DEPT OF LABOR &. INDUSTRY,CAIS
BOILER LIC.
25.00
25.00
379:1
05/26/98
210325
DOWDLE, VIRGINIA A
DARE ROLE MODELS
53.89
53.89
.793
05/26/98
231525
EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
MODIFY UNEMP. REPORT
500.00
500.00
37933
05/26/98
235000
ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS
EMERG. REP. STORM SEWER SYS.
1
1
37934
05/26/98
240375
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
TRUCK MAINT. E7
287.16
TRUCK MAINT. R7
287.16
TRUCK MAINT.
110.00
TRUCK MAINT.
90.00
TRUCK MAINT.
287.16
TRUCK MAINT. R -2
287.16
TRUCK MAINT. R1
287.16
1
37935
05/26/98
250200
ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC.
SANITARY SEWER CASTINGS /COVERS
3,834.00
3,834.00
37936
05/26/98
250500
EXECUTONE
TELEPHONE
1
1
37937
05/26/98
260250
FACILITY SYSTEMS,INC.
WORK SURFACE
150.80
ROUND TABLES /STACKING CHAIRS
2
2,499.13
37938
05/26/98
260255
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
COOLING FAN
42.55
FUEL REGULATOR
54.43
92.98
37939
05/26/98
260290
FARMER BROS. CO.
MDSE. FOR RESALE
259.08
MDSE. FOR RESALE
99.01
358.09
37940
05/26/98
260755
FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICATIONS
CD INITIAL
29.95
29.95
37941
05/26/98
270180
FLAIL - MASTER
CUTTERSHAFT WING /PULL
93.75
93.75
37942
05/26/98
280110
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC.
HAN -DE -BOOT RACK
20.30
.20.30
37943
05/26/98
30050 0
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
85.50
85.50
37944
05/26/98
300900
GFOA
GASB SUBSCRIPTION
135.00
135.00
37945
05/26/98
310300
GOPHER BEARING CO.
BEARING
240.30
240.30
37946
05/26/98
10 6 5 0
GOPHER DISPOSAL
APR I L RECYCLING
17 , 620.06
17
'7947
05/26/98
31() 680
GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING
SAFETY CABLE
51.36
LAMPS
134.82
186.18
37948
05/26/98
320265
GRAFIX SHOPPE
TRUCK EMBLEMS
342.50
342.50
VOUCHRE2
05/22/98 09:47
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
37949 05/26/98
37950 05/26/98
37951 05/26/98
37952 05/26/98
37953 05/26/98
37954 05/26/98
37955 05/26/98
37956 05/26/98
37957 05/26/98
37958 05/26/98
37959 05/26/98
37960 05/26/98
37961 05/26/98
37962 05/26/98
37963 05/26/98
37964 05/26/98
37965 05/26/98
37966 05/26/98
37967 05/26/98
37968 05/26/98
.3>7969 05/26/98
.�1
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 4
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
340400
HELLE, KERRY
MEALS AT MEDIC SCHOOL
10.84
10.84
351300
HORSNELL, JUDITH
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 34.7 MI.
9.72
9.72
410370
KATH
INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES
38.95
38.95
420150
KINKO'S CUSTOMER ADM SERVICES
ENGLISH STR. PLANS
15.18
15.18
430300
KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC.
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
46.99
46.99
450460
LAKES ORTHODONTIC ASSOC, P.A.
REFUND OF ESCROW
22
INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS
174.93
22
500651
M.R.P.A.
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS
435.00
BA
90.00
TE, PS, LC, DT
222.00
DT
90.00
837.00
510500
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
BIRTHDAY CAKES
82.50
BIRTHDAY CAKES
96.25
178.75
510925
MAPLEWOOD TRAVEL
TRAVEL'& TRAINING
619.00
619.00
511750
MAUTZ PAINT CO.
PAINT FOR WATER TOYS
137.94
137.94
530504
MENARDS
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
131.23
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
6.84
WHEEL BARROW
156.36
294.43
530560
MERIT CHEVROLET
WHEEL
174.93
174.93
530730
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
EQUIP. BAGS, UMP. INDICATORS
372.97
BASKETBALL RIMS
740.16
1,113.13
540150
MID - AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
REPAIR FILE SYSTEM CABINETS
68.49
68.49
540170
MIDWEST CHILDREN'S RESOURCE CT
COPIES- INVESTIGATION PHOTOS
9.87
9.87
540480
MIKE'S LP GAS & R.V. SERVICE
L.P. TANK.'
18.20
18.20
54:350
MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP
PVC PIPE, AGRI DRAIN CK VALVE
339.16
339.16
542455
MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC
DOCUMENT SHREDDING
66.60
66.60
551500
MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
LIC. RENEWAL E. NADEAU
23.00
23.00
630775
NATURAL RESOURCES RESTORATION
OPEN SPACE BURN -FROST & ENGLIS
900.00
FIRE BREAKS /CUTTING - PRIORY SIT
2
2
6=0949
NEEDELS JANITOR SUPPLY
2100 SCALE & RUST REMOVER
76.10
76.10
.�1
VOU.CHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
05/22/98 .09:47
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
PAGE 5
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
CHECK,"
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
37970
05/26/98
630951
NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY
STORM SEWER REPAIRS 98 -02
1
1 01
37971.
05/26/98
660900
NORTH STAR TURF, INC.
6 BAGS SEED
477.33
477.33
37972
05/26/98
661181
NORTHERN AIRGAS
MEDICAL OXYGEN
163.02
163.02
37973
05/26/98
661755
NORTHERN STATES POWER
2501
252.13
1830
79879.75
1830
1,430.53
1985
156.25
1830
4,825.93
2100
12
26
37974
05/26/98
661772
NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY
PVC, SEWER PIPE
467.97
467.97
37975
05/26/98
681151
OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
265.08
265.08
37976
05/26/98
691150
ONE HOUR MOTO PHOTO
FILM PICK UP
15.31
PHOTO DEVELOPING
7.66
REPRINTS BANQUET ROOM
56.38
REPRINTS THEATER
20.45
99.80
37977
05/26/98
691155
ONGUARD
TRAVEL & TRAINING
552.63
552.63
37978
05/26/98
691160
ON SITE SANITATION
SATELLITE SERVICE
43.73
SATELLITE SERVICE
43.73
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
SATELLITE SERVICE
19.87
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
. SATELLITE SERVICE
27. 83
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
SATELLITE SERVICE
55.65
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
SATELLITE SERVICE
27.83
SATELLITE SERVICE
145.30
670.07
37979
05/26/98
700800
PAPER WAREHOUSE, INC.
BALOONS, RIBBONS, NAPKINS,FORK:
110.66
110.66
37980
05/26/98
720750
PRAIRIE MOON NURSERY
TRILLIUM GRANDIFLOR
34.20
34.20
37981
05/26/98
720770
PRESS PUBLICATIONS
RESIDENT GUIDE
183 . sa
183 . () 0
37982
05/26/98
741200
RAINBOW FOODS
SNACK EAR
21.30
2 1.30
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 6
45/22/98
09:47
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
37983
05/26/98
742114
REGIONS HOSPITAL
PARAMEDIC MEDICATIONS
198.91
198.91
37984
45/26/98
750500
REGAL AUTO WASH #20M
VEH. WASHES
135.40
VEH. WASHES
22.50
VEH. WASHES
67.50
VEH. WASHES
15.40
240.00
37985
05/26/98
750550
REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS
MDSE. FOR RESALE
363.56
363.56
37986
05/26/98
751400
RICK'S DEER & BEAVER REMOVAL
DEER REMOVAL
200.00
200.00
37987
05/26/98
751450
RITZ CAMERA
FILM
20.44
FILM
97.45
117.89
37988
05/26/98
762205
ROSSMAN, DAVID
MEALS AT MEDIC SCHOOL
23.41
23.01
37989
05/26/98
780300
S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.
CORK BOARD
191.74
191.74
37990
05/26/98
780640
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
RUFFIES, DUM DUM, AIRHEADS
29.97
29.97
37991
05/26/98
800075
SEARS
SMALL TOOLS
117.71
117.71
37992
05/26/98
840405
ST. PAUL, CITY OF
RADIO REPAIR
236.34
RADIO REPAIR
20.30
256..64
37993
05/26/98
843300
STEICHENS
BACKBOARDS & RIMS
638.95
BACKBOARDS & RIMS
212.95
851.90
37994
05/26/98
843575
STREICHER'S
20,000 ROUND HANDGUN PRAC AMMO
3
3
37995
05/26/98
850320
SUBURBAN SPORTSWEAR, INC.
2 COLOR BUTTON SHIRTS
180.00
SPOT DRY
4.50
ARTWORK
20.00
YTH & ADULT 2 -COLOR T- SHIRTS
826.20
1
37996
05/26/98
850395
SUNRAY B -T -B
PLUGS, CLAMPS
39.31
FILTERS
36.24
75.55
37997
05/26/98
850665
SUPERIOR FENCE INCORPORATED
BASEBALL FIELD FENCE /BACKSTOP
22,925.00
22,925.00
37998
05/26/98
860305
T.J.T. - SHIRTS
SMALL & MED. BIRTHDAY SHIRTS
485.00
485.00
37999
05/26/98
860410
TSE, INC.
NEWSLETTER
156.22
156.22
38000
05/26/98
861620
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
500 GAL ATHLETIC FIELD PAINT
2,263.13
2
38001
05/26/98
880501
TREADWAY GRAPHICS
DARENS FLUSH LION
250.88
250.88
380i �2
05/'26/98
8808 00
TRUCK. UTILITIES MFG.
REPAIR WIRING
71.41
71.41
=3800
05/26/98
8 81750
TWIN CITY HARDWARE
DOOR FULL
=9 5.6
-3- 95.6'
VOUCHRE2
05/22/98 09:47
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
38004 05/26/98
38005 05/26/98
38006 05/26/98
38007 05/26/98
38008 05/26/98
38009 05/26/98
38010 05/26/98
38011 .05/26198
38012 05/26/98
38013 05/26/98 989005 ZWIEG, SUSAN
STAMPS -AFTER THE FIRE BROCHURE
TOTAL CHECKS
PAGE 7
ITEM
CHECK
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
AMOUNT
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
304.53
94.90
FOR PERIOD 05
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
882000
TWIN CITY SAW & SERVICE
CO CHAIRS, GRIND. WHEEL, OIL, CAP
890910
US WEST DEX
JULY ADVERTISING
900100
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
BLUE SHIRTS, GLOVES
40.00
SMALL SILVER SGT CHEVRON
901300
UPPER MIDWEST SALES CO.
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
23.97
16.63
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
911350
VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
LITE FOR MAIN RD. SIGN
60.84
TIMER FOR TRAIL LIGHTING
912100
VIRTUE PRINTING
BLDG. PERMIT CARDS INSP. REC.
931300
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
COMM. PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
COMM. PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
COMM. PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
943605
WONDERMAT
UNIFORM CLEANING
960450
XEROX CORPORATION
XEROX USAGE
XEROX USAGE
XEROX USAGE
XEROX USAGE
38013 05/26/98 989005 ZWIEG, SUSAN
STAMPS -AFTER THE FIRE BROCHURE
TOTAL CHECKS
PAGE 7
ITEM
CHECK
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
304.53
304.53
94.90
94.90
90.85
14.23
105.08
409.76
154.63
564.39
258.26
67.21
325.47
373.76
373.76
32.00
40.00
40.00-
32.00
23.97
23.97
16.63
107.15
25.90
60.84
210.52
32.00 32.00
197,820.14
VOUCHRE2
is l '(Y OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 1
< <�5/29/98
10:46
VOUCHER /CHECK H GISTER
FOR PERIOD s 1`
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK:
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
7517
05/26/98
430970
KRECH'S BUSINESS SYSTEMS,
INC. TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
34.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
34.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
46.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
34.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
34.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
46.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
46.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
46.0
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
46.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
34.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
34.)0
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
34.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
34.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
34.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
34.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
46.
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
34.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
46.00
TYPEWRITER MAINT CONTRACT
46.00
742.!0
7518
05/29/9B
190400
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES
DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE
872.00
872.00
7519
05/29/98
943500
WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVENUE
WISCONSIN SWT —MAY 98
967.11
967.11
752
05/29/98
722200
P.E.R.A.
P/R DEDUCT MAY FOR JUNE PREM
297.00
297.00
TOTAL CHECKS
2,578.11
VOUCHRE2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/28/98
_1 4:ts5
VOUCHER /CHEClc'
REGISTER
PAGE i
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
ITEM
CHECP"
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
38018
06 /o2/ 98
MED I CA WR I TTENS TEAM
BAL . AFTER MEDICARE PMT
45.90
45.90
380 19
06/0'2/98
ROBYN DOBBS
UNDER THE RAINBOW
50.00
50.
380
0b / 02 98
ARTHUR F'E I SERT
REF. BAL. 1998 MEMB. TOM E.
53.28
53.28
-38021
06/02/98
VICTORIA WALSH
2 SWIM REFUNDS
76.00
76.00
602?
06/02/98
ST. PAUL AREA COUNCIL OF CHAMB
GROUP OVERPAID
21.60
21.60
?802 =1
06/
NATALIE BONFIG
SWIM REFUND
;g _00
8 . i �i �
- 38X24
06/02/98
DICK WALTER
REF. TO PATIENT -PD F18824
294.45
y
?94.4=
38025
06/02/98
SECURA INSURANCE
REF. INS.- BILLED INCORRECTLY
67.77
67.77
8026
06/02/98
(_)10050
9 -1 -1 MAGAZINE
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS
16.95
16.95
- --3 x27
06/02/98
010300
AJ FORLITI PHOTOGRAPHY
PORTRAIT PHOTO, GROUP PHOTO
237.54
237.54
18028
06/02/98
010467
AT & T
CELL PHONES
CELL PHONES
82.27
23.36
CELL PHONES 4/15 - 5/16/98
86.88
TELEPHONE
45.32
TELEPHONE
258.11
TELEPHONE
17.73
CELL PHONE
11.68
CELL PHONE
110.18
ACCT. #4163515
76.78
712. -31
�Bf 2 9
06/022/98
020870
ALLIED MEDICAL ACCOUNT CONTROL
COLLECTION AGENCY
SERVICES
274.19
274.19
06/02/98
021205
AMERICAN FLAGPOLE & FLAG CO.
FLAGS
138.45
1-'-.8.45
8� s31
06 / 021/ 98
0 0660
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES !l INC.
AN I MAL CONTROL FOR 5/18-5/2
370.65
=70.65
� f6/ i ice' /98
041494-
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
STORM CLEAN UP
STORM CLEAN UP
852. r;0
852.00
1,704.00
38i
061100
E!ANN I GAN & KELLY P.A.
LEGAL & FISCAL
-
APRIL SERVICES
_ . 75
95 .o(-)
APRIL SERVICES
9 , 44s � . 51
9,559.26
.= •8! =s.�:4
+?6 /�s�'i�i'8
11�ib5i>
CATCu
REPAIR P.T.O. SHAFT
172.75
172.75
ciU
06/! =s2/98
CENTRAL STORES
OFF I L L
69.41
6.41
(]6 /! 2/98
1"0
CUSTOM FI
PAINT FWD. EiR 1 VERS PUMP PANEL
?5.0 s
8 !'s =7
Cs6 /!.s'/Vo
k
D- C.A.,INC.
DENTAL Cl-AIMS 5 -^ - `�i�
_
1 , 199.,.
1 199 �1.
VOUCHRE2
C I T Y OF MAPLE.WOOD
05/28/98
14:05
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
38 038
%6/02/98
180985
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO.
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
38039
06/02/98
190190
DENIS PROPERTIES LLC
7382 - 1668 COPE AVE E
7382 - 1668 COPE AVE E
38040
06/02/98
230850
EASTMAN, THOMAS
REFRESHMENTS -STAFF TRAINING
38041
t )6/02/98
27,0900
DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO.
MIN. BILL /USAGE .BILL
MIN. BILL /USAGE BILL
MIN. BILL /USAGE BILL
MIN. BILL /USAGE BILL
MIN. BILL /USAGE BILL
MIN. BILL /USAGE BILL
MIN. BILL /USAGE BILL
MIN. FULL /USAGE BILL
MIN. BILL /USAGE BILL
MIN. BILL /USAGE BILL
38042
06/02/98
230960
ECOPRINT
BUSINESS CARDS
BUSINESS CARDS
BUSINESS CARDS
BUSINESS CARDS
38043
06/02/98
240375
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
MEDIC 4 REPAIR
38044
06/62/98
250190
ESI CABLING SERVICES, INC.
REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT
REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT
LABOR
38045
06/02/98
260255
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
COOLING FAN
FUEL PUMP
8046
06/02/98
•300500
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
38047
66/02/98
710150
GONYEA HOMES
DUPLICATE PMT. F18831
38048
06/02/98
32052� �
GRUBER ' S POWER EQUIPMENT
CHAIN SAW
CHAINS/BARS
:7.13049
06/02/98
:3_0150
HALE , THOMAS M
MILEAGE RE I MBURSEME tTT 184 MI.
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 1'8 MI.
3805 ►
06/02/98
':7X0220
HAN HITCH & WEI -DING CO. INC.
HITCH FOR R
7,riotil
06/02/93
' . = ; 0 7 5 0
HEAR T OF THE Ltik.ES CONST
1201 FR I SB i E AVE.. E
ITEM
AMOUNT
12,008.50
987.00
2,500.00
80.41
33.01
80.0
80.20
2.64
103.62
215.88
191.86
45.74
88.25
214.56
177.70
39.94
159.75
159.75
39.94
79.54
96.52
72.42
154.00
92.97
115.70
45.85
26.98
63.01
112.88
68.11
21.14
795.78
479.25
261.46
5 1 . •fi
_7.64
271. 05
1 , .Oo
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
12,995.50
2,580.41
33.01
1,200.65
399.38
79.50
322 . 94
+..1 i i
208.67
37-7.97
795.78
740.71
88.96
271.05
cl )()
VOUCHRE2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 3
05/28/98
14:05
VOUCHER /CHECK; REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD (-
VOUCHER/
CHECK.
CHECK'
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK:
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
1201 FRISBIE AVE. E
36.71
1,036.71
38052
06/02/98
340601
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
TRAINING SCHOOL
1,198.25
1 9 198.25
38053
06/02/98
350700
HIRSHFIELDS
FAINT /SUPPLIES
52.24
52.24
38054
06/02/98
380469
I.P.M.A. MINNESOTA
LUNCHEON MEETING 6 -3 -98
15.00
15.00
38055
06/02/98
380860
IMPERIAL, INC.
SUPPLIES - VEHICLE
71.33
71.3;
38056
06/02/98
390104
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #622
COMPLETE CATERING MENU BROCHUR
1 9 162.74
HILLY MCLAUGHLIN POST CARD
54.50
FYDER EVERHART POST CARD
46.40
1
38057
06/02/98
401400
JOE RICE HOMES
2674 HAWTHORNE AVE. E
1,000.00
2674 HAWTHORNE AVE. E
23.15
1292 MYRTLE ST N
1,000.00
1292 MYRTLE STN
26.03
2
38058
06/02/98
401615
JOHNSON, JOE
PERSONAL TRAINING
240.00
240.00
38059
06/02/98
410152
K.D. HOMES
855 CRESTVIEW DR. S
1
855 CRESTVIEW DR. S
13.70
1, i ►13 .70
38060
06/02/98
410370
K:ATH
WATER PUMP
29.50
TRAILER ADAPTER
15.42
OIL FILTER CAP
3.40
48,32
38t-
>6/ 02/98
420200
KLAGER , WENDY
TRAVEL & TRAINING
28.00
^8.00
38062
06/02/98
430970
KRECH'S BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
REPAIR LEXMARK PRINTERS
97.50
REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT
116.95
214.45
06/02/9e
450480
LANDMARK: CUSTOM HOMES
2673 BARCLHY ST. N
1
267= BARCLAY ST. N
27.26
2434 NEBRASKA AVE.E
1
2434 NEBRASKA AVE.E
18.77
2
'8064
06/02/98
459495
LARSON COMPANIES
WORK. ON CHIEF 1 CAR
72.48
72_48
3 8 65
06/0-
470726
L I NDER ' S GREENHOUSES & GARDEN
LAWN SEED
42.79
42.79
3-8066
06/02/98
480565
LOMBARD1, JIM
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT y(i MI.
25.20
25.20
.8067
06/02/98
50651
M. R. F. A.
SUMMER LEADERSHIP WOR KSHOP
40.0(
40. i_ >0
78(_)68
>6/ C / G
MAMA S t ' I ' ZA
FOOD F Vt; STORM STANDLY ST"". _
68.48
68.48
.18()69
06/i ?2/98
Slli50<>
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
BIRTHDAY CAKES
41.25
41.25
±8()7(,
06/02/98
521)475
MCDONALDS
FOOD FOR STORM STANDBY STA 7
65.77
65.77
01('
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 4
05/28/98
14:05
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VOUCHER/
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK:
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
38{71
06/02/98
520500
MCGUIRE, MICHAEL
VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
450.
450.00
18072
06/02/98
530560
MERIT CHEVROLET
INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES
1
1
38073
06/02/98
530815
METRO FIRE INC.
BOOTS
79.00
79.00
38074
06/02/98
531650
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
MTHLY BILLING -SEWER SERVICE
202,524.00
202
38075
06/02/98
540175
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.
BEVERAGES
210.65
210.65
38076
06/02/98
630070
N.Y.S.C.A.
COACHES, MEMBERSHIPS
340.00
340.00
'8077
06/02/98
630951
NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY
STORM SEWER REPAIRS - 98 -02
1
1,261.68
38078
06/02/98
640030
NEXT CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES, INC
CABLE, ADAPTER, SHIPPING
94.19
LABOR, OPTICAL DISK, INSTALL.
87.50
181.69
38079
06/02/98
660180
NORTH METRO AUTOMOTIVE
WORK: TO D. CHIEF 3 CAR
209.45
209.45
38� X80
06/02/98
660800
NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF
UTILITIES
1
UTILITIES
218.29
UTILITIES
178.05
UTILITIES
223.87
2 , 493.84
38081
06/02/98
661755
NORTHERN STATES POWER
UTILITIES
29.53
UTILITIES
152.45
181.98
3808
06/02/98
680575
OCCUPATIONAL HLTH SERV /ALLINA
PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
61.00
PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
261.50
PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
61.50
PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
78.50
PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
61.50
PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
61.50
PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
61.50
PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
78.50
725.50
8� j8
06/02/98
691150
ONE HOUR MOTO PHOTO
PHOTO DEVELOPING
7.66
7.66
38084
06
691600
ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELP'MNT CORP
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS
164.00
164.0
380ar-
06/02/98
7007 ?5
PALMA, STEVEN T
K -9 HANDLER
35.00
35.00
38006
06/02/98
711500
PHYSIO CONTROL CORPORATION
LIFEPAK CABLES
191.79
191.79
38087
06/02/98
712110
PLAZA TV & APPLIANCE
DISHWASHER
571.91
571.91
38! f88
06 /!i2 / 98
741'x
RAINBOW FOODS
CUP'S & NAPKINS-DARE
10.97
1 t) . 97
'8� ►89
f)6/!J2/98
7416
RAMSEY COUNTY
FE.B. D PROLES SING SERVICES
2.95
F . DA t A PROCESSING SERVICES
19(- 6�
FEB. DATA PROCESSING SERVICES
'?►.91
3
VOUCHRE'-?
05/28/98 14:05
VOUCHER/
CHECK. CHECK:
NUMBER DATE
38{ y90 06/02/98
38091 06/02/98
:8092 06/02/98
39193 06/02/98
38094 06/02/98
38095 06/02/98
38096 06/02/98
38097 06/02/98
38098 06/02/98
,:;8099 i >6 / 02 / 98
l�
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 5
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 05
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
FEB. DATA PROCESSING SERVICES
276.45
COMPUTER USAGE MARCH 1998
4.98
COMPUTER USAGE MARCH 1998
209.54
COMPUTER USAGE MARCH 1998
14.29
COMPUTER USAGE MARCH 1998
279.28
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
2.50
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
755.65
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
524.35
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
2
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
57.50
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
210 . t ?0
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
15.00
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
22.50
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
82.50
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
12.50
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
12.50
1997 SPECIAL ASSESS CHGS
2.50
1997 SPECIAL.ASSESS CHGS
242.50
5
750550
REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS
REFRIGERATOR
2,136.39
2
762205
ROSSMAN, DAVID
MEALS AT MEDIC SCHOOL
28.30
28.30
780300
S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
44.93
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
29.40
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
83.81
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
381.86
540.00
780375
SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
ENGINEERING SERVICES PROJ 89 -21
616.98
616.98
820500
SMITH, DAN
1751 LAKEWOOD DR. N
1
1751 LAKEWOOD DR. N
33.29
1
843575
STREICHER'S
REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE
486.61
486.61
850395
SUNRAY B -T -B
WIX, FUSE
68.19
FUSE
.67
68.86
860080
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
4
4
880501
TREADWAY GRAPHICS
DUFFEL BAG,WARM UP JACK:ET,PANT
49.56
SPORT DUFFEL BAGS
42.50
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
340.81
DARE T- SHIRTS SM & MED
44.90
SPORT DUFFEL BAG
227.64
705.41
89� i980
UNITED WASTE SERVICES OF MINN
DUMPSTERS
294.84
DUMPSTERS
96.5?
DUMPSTERS
124.08
DUMPSTERS
53.15
568.60
l�
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
`
PAGE 6
05/28/98
14:05
VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD (-
VOUCHER/
CHECK:
CHECK:
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK:
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
38100
06/02/98
901300
UPPER MIDWEST SALES CO.
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
467.89
467.89
38101
06/02/98
911600
VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS
BODY BELTS
101.60
101.60
3. 8102
06/02/98
9
WAK,•OTA MUTUAL AID ASSOC.
1998 MEMBERSHIP
15.00
15.00
38103
06/02/98
941225
WHEELER; CONSOLIDATED, INC.
RETAINING WALL TIMBERS
1
1, 051 .79
38104
06/02/98
970700
YOCUM OIL CO.
FUEL & OIL
25.86
FUEL
10.48
36.34
TOTAL CHECKS
273,161.01
l�
l5
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
ALLENSPACH, SHERRY
325.77
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
- CARLSON, THERESE
1, 595.26
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
BODINE , RENEE
1 3 5 5.3 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
FAUST DANIEL F
,
3 , 027.38
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
ANDERSON,CAROLE J
972.07
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
DEHN,DEBORAH
1,440.92
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
HANGSLEBEN,RICHARD
1,940.52
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
KLAGER
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
BEHM,LOIS
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
CARLE,JEANETTE E
1,389.26
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
JAGOE , CAROL
1 314.5 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
OLSON, SANDRA
1 037.3 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
POWELL, PHILIP
1 5 52.31
DIRECT DEPOSIT
0 5/29/98
ALDRIDGE, MARK
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
BECKER, RONALD D
2
.DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
BOHL,JOHN C
2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
FLOR,TIMOTHY
2 227,23
`
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
KVAM,DAVID
2 1 124.78
O
DIRECT DEPOS
05/29/98
STEFFEN,SCOTT L
2 503.40
�
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
YOUNGREN , JAMES
2 513.7 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
EVERSON , PAUL
1, 6 7 6.6 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
FRASER, JOHN
1, 9 7 6.61
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
ADELSON , LINDA
8 3 3.0 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
STAHNKE ,JULIE A
1 420.92
l5
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
2
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
05/29/98
RAIDER, KENNETH G
3 ,10 5.2 0
DIRF - "I' DEPOSIT
05/29/98
- PRIEFER, WILLIAM
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
0 5/29/98
LUNDSTEN , LANCE
2 0 8 6.6 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
OSWALD ER C
, I K D
1, 628.74
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
DUCHARME JOHN
,
1, 532.92
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
PECK,DENNIS L
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
ANDERSON , BRUCE
2 6 4 0.10
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
BURKE,MYLES R
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
MARUSKA,MARK A
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
GREW- HAYMAN,JANET M
895.06
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
COLEMAN., MELINDA
2 , 605.67
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
EKSTRAND , THOMAS G
1, 8 4 7.15
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
ROBERTS , KENNETH
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
EASTMAN , THOMAS E
2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
TAYLOR KATHERINE
�
124.20
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05 /29/98
HURLEY,STEPHEN
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
TAUBMAN,DOUGLAS J
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
EDGE ,DOUGLAS
1 392.92
�
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
CROSSON , LINDA
1 415.4 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L
1 04 4.2 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
KNAUS S, PETER
7 5 9.5 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
PALMA, STEVEN
2 2 8 9.6 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
JOHNSON , KEVIN
2 416.3 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
WARMAN , ROBIN
834.95
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
3
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
w`www�wwwwww
DATE
ww��wwww
EMPLOYEE NAME
w�wrwww���wwwwwiwwwww�wwwwwwww
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT-
05/29/98
�wwwwww�wwwwwwwww�
DOHERTY , KATHLEEN M
1 4 2 0.9 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
0 5/29/98
- JENS EN , MATTHEW
5 0 9.4 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
LE , SHERYL
2 7 2 4.9 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
DOWDLE VIRGINIA
�
2,114.98
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
RO SSBACH,GEORGE
370.20
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
LUTZ,DAVID P
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
SCHLINGMAN,PAUL
1 718.62
'
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
FARR,DIANE M
245.93
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
GRAF,MICHAEL
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
VORWERK,ROBERT E
2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
NAGEL , BRYAN
1 1 5 71.0 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
GUI LFOILE, KAREN E
1,799962
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
HELLE, KERRY
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
0 5/29/98
CARVER, NICHOLAS N
1 7 4 8.92
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
OSIER, ANDREA J
1,420.92
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
ANDREWS SCOTT A
2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
RUNNING,ROBERT
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
SAVAGEAU,STEPHEN D
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
BARTEL, DENISE
81900
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
CARLSON , DALE
3 2 5.7 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
MARTINSON, CAROL F
1, 757.69
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
HI EBERT , STEVEN
1,991957
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
DUNN ,ALICE
.2,542.86
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
ANZALDI , MANDY
80915
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
4
1
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
CORNER, AMY L
152.5 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
STEVENS , MARY CATHERINE
3 6.4 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
HORSNELL, JUDITH A
797.6 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
SEEGER,GERALD F
322.24
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
MOREHEAD,JESSICA R
144.51
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
STILL,VERNON T
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
LOMBARDI,JAMES D
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
HUTCHINSON,ANN E
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
COLEMAN,PHILIP
232.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
KELLY , KEVIN P
1 7 8 8.9 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
BELDE , STANLEY
1, 8 5 8.3 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
ATKINS , KATHERINE
500936
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
ZWIEG, SUSAN C.
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
FRY, PATRICIA
i, 4ii. 32
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
RENSLOW,RITA
191010
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
BAKKE,LONN A
1,435932
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
BERGERON,JOSEPH A
2,790.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
CONNOLLY, RICK A
128.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
BOWMAN ,RICK A
1, 9 9 4 . 2 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
CAVETT ,CHRISTOPHER M
2, 0 6 5.8 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
KANE ,MICHAEL R
1, 9 3 3.8 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
KOPPEN , MARVIN
3 2 5.7 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
CHRI STENS EN , JOD I E D
5 5 3.7 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
STAPLES PAULINE
r
2,230.62
4
1
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
5
I J
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
KITTRIDGE, KEVIN L
3 2 5.7 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
� WASH MATTHEW G
68.25
.DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
PIKE,GARY K
1,209.98
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
ICKES,SHERI
1
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
THOMALLA,DAVID J
2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
PARR,GAIL L
215.68
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN
1 9.3 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
DRI SCOLL , MARGARET H
1 010.5 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT
05/29/98
HEINZ , STEPHEN J
2 0 5 0.6 4
65500
05/29/98
MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A
3,953.17
65501
05/29/98
ZICK,LINDA
264.50
65502
05/29/98
PIEKARSKI,GREGORY J.
86.25
65503
05/29/98
WHITE,BARRY T
50.00
65504
05/29/98
CUDE,LARRY J
369.15
65505
05/29/98
MIKISKA,WILLIAM
229990
65506
05/29/98
KIGIN,DAVID W
760.00
65507
05/29/98
SHELLEDY,DAWN M
564.00
65508
05/29/98
JACKSON,MARY L
1
65509
05/29/98
KELSEY,CONNIE L
559905
65510
05/29/98
MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE
1
65511
05/29/98
NIVEN,AMY S
166.00
65512
05/29/98
CASAREZ,GINA
1
65513
05/29/98
EVANS,JOHN G
1
65514
05/29/98
JOHNSON,BONNIE
821.32
5
I J
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
�0
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
65515
05/2.9/98
VIETOR,LORRAINE S
1
65516
05/29/98
PALANK,MARY KAY
1
65517
05/29/98
RICHIE,CAROLE L
1
65518
05/29/98
RYAN,MICHAEL
2
65519
05/29/98
SVENDSEN,JOANNE M
1
65520
05/29/98
BANICK,JOHN J
2
65521
05/29/98
BARTZ, PAUL
1 720 -. 87
65522
05/29/98
HALWEG,KEVIN R
2
65523
05/29/98
HERBERT,MICHAEL J
1
65524
05/29/98
KARIS,FLINT D
2
65525
05/29/98
MACFARLANE,MELVIN R
1
65
05/29/98
RABBETT.,KEVIN
1
65527
05/29/98
RAZSKAZOFF,DALE
1
65528
05/29/98
ROSSMAN,DAVID A
1
65529
05/29/98
SHORTREED,MICHAEL P
2
65530
05/29/98
STAFNE,GREGORY L
1
65531
05/29/98
STOCKTON,DERRELL T
1
65532
05/29/98
SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J
1
65533
05/29/98
WATCZAK,LAURA
1
65534
05/29/98
WELCHLIN,CABOT V
1,873.72
65535
05/29/98
HALE.,THOMAS M
1
65536
05/29/98
MEEHAN,JAMES
2,528.27
65537
05/29/98
MELANDER,JON A
2,948.65
65538
05/29/98
THIENES,PAUL
2,861.06
�0
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
7
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
65539
05/29/98
ALFRED,DAVID W
10000.0
65540
05/29/98
MASON,JOHN W
100.00
65541
05/29/98
FECHT,MICHAEL J
137.50
65542
05/29/98
BOYER,SCOTT K
1
65543
05/29/98
FEHR.,JOSEPH P
1
65544
05/29/98
FLAUGHER,JAYME L
1
65545
05/29/98
LAFFERTY,WALTER
1
65546
05/29/98
RABINE,JANET L
1
65547
05/29/98
HEWITT,JOEL A
2
65548
0:5/29/98
CHLEBECK,JUDY M
1
65549
05/29/98
DARST,JAMES
1
65550
05/29/98
FREBERG,RONALD L
1
65551
05/29/98
MEYER,GERALD W
1
65552
05/29/98
THOMAS- JR,STEVEN
1 1 392992
65553
05/29/98
ELIAS,JAMES G
1
65554
05/29/98
LINDBLOM,RANDAL
1
65555
05/29/98
PRIEBE,WILLIAM
1
65556
05/29/98
ANDERSON,ROBERT S
1
65557
05/29/98
HELEY,ROLAND B
1
65558
05/29/98
HINNENKAMP,GARY
1
65559
05/29/98
LAVAQUE.,MICHAEL
1
65560
05/29/98
LINDORFF,DENNIS P
1
65561
05/29/98
NAUGHTON,JOHN W
833.00
65562
05/29/98
SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES
1
7
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
8
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
65563
05/29/98
STARK,RICHARD E
170.63
65564
05/29/98
MACY,RITA
393.13
65565
05/29/98
NELSON,JEAN
837.73
65566
05/29/98
SOUTTER,CHRISTINE
205963
65567
05/29/98
THOMPSON,DEBRA J
404.21
65568
05/29/98
WEGWERTH,JUDITH A
1
65569
05/29/98
ANDERSON,EVERETT
811.84
65570
05/29/98
OSTROM,MARJORIE
2
65571
05/29/98
WENGER,ROBERT J
1
65572
05/29/98
BALLESTRAZZE,THAD M
76.65
65573
05/29/98
BRANDSTROM,JULIET M
31.50
65574
05/29/98
CROMETT, DUSTY
48.00
65575
05/29/98
FINN,GREGORY S
1
65576
05/29/98
FLUG,ELAINE R
138.70
65577
05/29/98
FLUG,MEGAN L
70.88
65578
05/29/98
FRANK,STEVE
228.44
65579
05/29/98
KELLY,LISA
889.48
65580
05/29/98
STIEN,MARY
1
65581
05/29/98
STIEN,NATHANIEL
124.10
65582
05:/29/98
VOGEL,PAUL R
24.90
65583
05/29/98
BREHEIM,ROGER W
1
65584
05/29/98
DAHL,HELENE M
566.07
65585
05/29/98
EDSON,DAVID B
2,194.57
65586
05/29/98
GERMAIN,DAVID
2
8
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
65587
05/29/98
NADEAU,EDWARD A
2
65588
05/29/98
NORDQUIST,RICHARD
1
65589
05/29/98
SCHULTZ,SCOTT M
1
65590
05/29/98
COONS,MELISSA
485.95
65591
05/29/98
GLASS,JEAN
614.45
65592
05/29/98
HOIUM,SHEILA
689.43
65593
05/29/98
KONZEM,THOMAS A
108.88
65.594
05/29/98
MICHALSKI.,ANDREW M
58.50
65595
05/29/98
NEAMY,MARK W
58.50
65596
05/29/98
SCHMIDT,RUSSELL
1
65597
05/29/98
SCHOEBERL,KAYLENE M
292.36
65598
05./29/98
SHOBERG,CARY J
121.88
65599
05/29/98
ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L.
240.50
65600
05/29/98
ANDERSON,JULIE M
101.82
65601
05/29/98
BADEN,ALISON L
283.70
65602
05/29/98
BADEN,MATHIAS
303.02
656.03
05/29/98
BITTNER,KATIE C
130.14
65604
05/29/98
CHAPMAN,JENNY A
243.34
65605
05/29/98
CONLIN,PAMELA
120.00
65606
05/29/98
COOPER,JOSEPH W
385.56
6.5607
05/29/98
ERICKSON,CAROL A
16.00
6.5608
05/29/98
GOPLEN,NICHOLAS P
58.50
65609
05/29/98
GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C
93.19
65610
05/29/98
HALL,WILLIAM J
24.00
0 4
)�L�
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
10
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
65611
05/29/98
HAWKE,RYAN A
147.88
65612
05/29/98
HAWKINS,LISA A
63.00
65613
05/29/98
HEIM.,ANDREA J
52.00
65614
05/29/98
HEINN,REBECCA L
78.75
65615
05/29/98
HOLMGREN,LEAH M
152.75
65616
05/29/98
HOULE,DENISE L
61.00
65617
05/29198
HUPPERT,ERIN M
260.01
65618
05/29/98
IKHAML,JOHN
126.00
65619
05/29/98
JOHNSON,ROBERT P
147.50
65620
05/29/98
JOHNSON,STETSON
232.38
65621
05/29/98
KOEHNEN,MARY B
511.00
65622
05/29/98
KOEPKE,JENNIFER M
237.41
65623
05/29/98
LIBBY,MEGAN K
19.50
65624
05/29/98
LUND,DANIEL T
80940
65625
05/29/98
MAGNUSON,BETH M
88.63
65626
05/29/98
MEISEL,TAMBREY
156.98
65627
05/29/98
MOTZ,ERIN M
120.25
65628
05/29/98
MCPHERSON,DEIRDRE
165.35
65629
05/29/98
POWERS,JESSICA
195900
65630
05/29/98
REGESTER, DOUG
44.00
65631
05/29/98
SACKMANN,LAURA C
162900
65632
05/29/98
SAPP,BARBARA R
92.45
65633
05/29/98
SCHLUETER,LOUISE E
75.81
65634
05/29/98
SHERRILL,MASON D
13.10
0 4
)�L�
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
11
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
65635
05/29/98
SKRIP,CARRIE A.
13.00
65636
05/29/98
SMITLEY,SHARON L
202.75
65637
05/29/98
SWANER,JESSICA
164.25
65638
05/29/98
THIBODEAU,KELLY M
626.04
65639
05/29/98
TIBODEAU,HEATHER J
232.20
65640
05/29/98
WARMAN,JOANNE M
55.25
65641
05/29/98
WARNER,CAROLYN
168.15
65642
.05/29/98
WEDES,CARYL H
79.50
65643
05/29/98
WOLKERSTORFER,HEATHER L
136.50
65644
05/29/98
WOODMAN,ALICE E
106900
65645
05/29/98
BOSLEY,CAROL
121961
65646
05/29/98
DISKERUD,HEATHER A
87.50
65647
05/29/98
FLEMING,KATHY A
375.00
65648
05/29/98
GLASS,GILLIAN
72.00
65649
05/29/98
KORBA,.NOAH A
52.50
65650
05/29/98
KRAMMER,KATHERINE A
31.50
65651
05/29/98
MACIOCH,AMY L
54.00
65652
05/29/98
SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN
206.00
65653
05/29/98
SHERRILL.,CAITLIN A
10.50
65654
05/29/98
SPANGLER,EDNA E
123.90
65655
05/29/98
ANTON,SARAH E
105900
65656
05/29/98
BANGERT,MARK A
49.50
65657
05/29/98
BEHAN,JAMES
1
65658
05/29/98
BLAKESLEY, JEFFERY DEAN
120900
TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS
292,473.83
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
12
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK
CHECK NUMBER
DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
65659
05/29/98
CALLEN,KATIE E
18.00
65660
05/29/98
CHAPEAU,GREG M
84.00
65661
05/29/98
ERICKSON,KYLE F
66.00
65662
05/29/98
FULLER,AMY R
78.00
65663
05/29/98
GLASS,BRIDGET M
180.00
65664
05/29/98
JAHN,DAVID J
1
65665
05/29/98
KOSKI,JOHN F
517.94
65666
05/29/98
KYRK,BREANNA K
44.10
65667
05/29/98
LONETTI,JAMES F
584.54
65668
05/29/98
MATTESON,FRANK M
90000
65669
05/29/98
NEWMAN,KELLY M
74.16
65670
05/29/98
POWERS ,NICOLE L
120.00
65671
05/29/98
SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M
150.00
65672
05/29/98
SEYLER,KIMBERLY A
180.00
65673
05/29/98
SKRYPEK,JOSHUA L
139.50
65674
05/29/98
STEINHORST, JEFFREY
231.53
65675
05/29/98
SWANSON,LYLE
1
65676
05/29/98
SWANSON,VERONICA
982.79
65677
05/29/98
TWEET,KEVIN J
78.00
65678
05/29/98
YOUNG,DILLON J
84.00
65679
05/29/98
MULVANEY,DENNIS M
1
65680
05/29/98
PRIEM, STEVEN A.
1
65681
05/29/98
SHRESTHA,ANUBHAV B
280.00
TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS
292,473.83
AGENDA ITEM G Z
AGENDA REPORT Aetian by Co unci.0
Endorsed
TO: City Manager Modify. ed....,,,�......,,..,,
R e j ected
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Date
SUBJECT: Skillman Avenue - Bittersweet Lane Overlay, Project 97 -08— Project
Acceptance /Final Payment
DATE: June 1, 1998
Attached is the final pay request for the Skillman Avenue- Bittersweet Lane Overlay
project. The contractor, Tower Asphalt, has completed all the required work.
The original contract bid amount was $165,878.00. Through the deletion of an
addenda item, the contract amount was revised and lowered to $93,490.25. The
significant change in the contract was due to the elimination of some of the contract
work that was performed by city forces.
The total final construction contract amount is $91,665.34, a savings of $1,834.91 from
the revised contract amount.
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution accepting
Project 97 -08 as complete and authorizing the release of final payment to Tower
Asphalt in the amount of $5,010°77 for the Skillman Avenue - Bittersweet Lane
Overlay Project.
jc
Attachments
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that
Skillman Avenue - Bittersweet Lane Overlay, City Project 97 -08, is complete and
recommends acceptance of the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 97 -08 is complete and maintenance of
these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of any retainage or escrow is
hereby authorized.
SKILLMAN AVENUE /BITTERSWEET LANE OVERLAY
PROJECT 97 -08
PROJECT PAYMENT REQUEST
Estimate No. Final Period Ending: October 30, 1997
Contractor: Tower Asphalt Contract Amount: 165,878.00
Original contract amount
Total earned to date
Less 0% retainage
Subtotal
Less previous payments
Amount due this e timate*
Contractor. i� 01
Engineer:
$165
$91,665.34
$0.00
$91,665.34
$86,654.57
$5,010.77
Date: .S /
Date/ � �"
UNIT
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QUANT.
PRICE
TOTAL
2021.501
1
Mobilization (5% max.)
LS
1.00
1.00
$7
$7,247.00
0563.601
Traffic control
LS
1.00
0.60
$2,760.00
$19656.00
2104.501
i
Remove B618 concrete curb and gutter
LF
309.00
337.00
$5.00
$1,685.00
! 2104.505
Remove concrete driveway /apron
SY
11.00
11.00
$10.00
$110.00
2104.505
Remove bitumino pavement
SY
29.00
170.00
$5.00
$850.00
2104.511
Sawing concrete pavement/C & G
LF
3.00
0.00
$10.00
$0.00
2104.513
Sawing bituminous pavement
LF
479.00
251.00
$2.00
$502.00
2105.501
Common excavation, P
CY
446.00
0.00
$10.00
$0.00
2105.525
Topsoil borrow, CV
CY
27.00
0.00
$10.00
$0.00
2105.533
Salvaged aggregate (CV)
CY
223.00
214.00
$14.00
$2,996.00
2105.533
Salvaged aggregate from stockpile (CV)
CY
335.00
0.00
$10.00
$0.00
2575.505
Sodding, type salt resistant
SY
70.00
262.00
$8.00
$2,096.00
2211.501
Aggregate base, Class 6
T
10.00
0.00
$12.00
$0.00
0331.603
Sawed joint
LF
822.00
905.00
$2.00
$1,810.00
2232.501
Mill bituminous surface 1.5"
SY
138.00
30.00
$14.00
$420.00
2340.508
Type 41 A wear course mixture
T
3752.00
1438.95
$28.25
$40
2340.514
Type 32B base course mixture
T
466.00
468.00
$27.50
$12,870.00
2356.505
Bituminous material for seal coat
Gal
205.00
0.00
$2.00
$0.00
2357.502
Bituminous material for tack coat
Gal
1430.00
255.00
$1.00
$255.00
2531.501
Concrete curb and gutter, Design B618
LF
334.00
362.00
$14.00
$5,068.00
2531.507
6 concrete driveway pavement
SY
45.00
45.00
$40.00
$1
0504.602
Adjust gate valve box
Ea
13.00
18.00
$150.00
$2
0506.503
Reconstruct catch basin
Ea
3.00
3.00
$850.00
$2
2506.516
Remove & replace R- 3065 -V casting
Ea
4.00
8.00
$400.00
$3
2506.622
Adjust frame and ring casting
Ea
19.00
13.00
$200.00
$2,600.00
� 0506.602
Regrout catch basin /manhole
Ea
1.00
1.00
$ 200.00
$ 200.00
2506.516
Furnish & install R- 3250 -1 curb box
Ea
1.00
1.00
$400.00
$400.00
Total
$91
Original contract amount
Total earned to date
Less 0% retainage
Subtotal
Less previous payments
Amount due this e timate*
Contractor. i� 01
Engineer:
$165
$91,665.34
$0.00
$91,665.34
$86,654.57
$5,010.77
Date: .S /
Date/ � �"
Agenda Ite
�ri
Action by Council
Endorsed
Modified;_...,,,,,,,,..,,.,.,
M emoran d u m D��ected __„�_,,,,,
To:
City Council
CC:
Bruce Anderson V
From:
Ann E. Hutchinson
Date:
May 13, 1998
Subject:
Nature Center Donation Fund
Background:
The nature center has set up a donation fund for crediting any and all
donations that we receive. Although this is a fund that needs to be
spent annually like other budget lines, we like to save up the one, five,
and 20 dollar donations so that we are able to purchase more expensive
items - such as our video camera with a macro zoom that allows
children to see small organisms on a T.V. screen. The cost of the video
set -up was $1800.
To save this amount of money requires us to carry over the fund from
year to year. Unfortunately, this February, I simply forgot to ask the
finance director to carry over the fund from 1997 to 1998.
Recommendation:
I respectfully ask the council to authorize the finance director to make
the appropriate budget changes necessary to re- establish the fund. The
budget line is 101- 604 - 000 -4600. As of December 31, 1997 there was
$1,711.00 credited to the account.
Agenda
TO: Michael A.
FROM: Bruce K. And
DATE: June 1, 1998 f0t th
SUBJECT: Kohlman Overlook Park
INTRODUCTION
19981City Council Meeting
Action by Counailu
En dors edr.
Mo 1 f i a d,. ,.,.�..�...,,..,
Rejected-
Date ....
The Maplewood City Council formally approved the acquisition and development of Kohlman
Overlook Park in March 1997. The park was 90% completed in 1997 with final landscaping
scheduled for completion in the spring of 1998. The project has been extremely challenging
due to the steep topography and inability to establish turf. The site has experienced significant
erosion along the southwest corner, which was ultimately resolved through additional
stormwater catch basins and regrading. The erosion problems continued along the northern
edge, running west to Walter Street. To resolve this issue, staff made a decision to approve
additional sod to complete the site.
BACKGROUND
Kohlman Overlook Park development was started in June 1997 and was 90% completed by
November 1, 1997. The last remaining issue was landscaping issues.
A major volunteer tree planting program was coordinated by city staff involving 70 to 80
residents on Saturday, April 18.
To resolve the erosion problem, staff provided authorization for Lino Lakes Sod to sod the
remaining turf areas which were scheduled for seed and erosion blanket. The purpose for the
"emergency sodding" was to immediately establish turf and eliminate the erosion problems
which were occurring on the northern edge due to the steep grades. The sodding is currently
in process and is scheduled for completion by Wednesday, June 3. The sodding will be
completed at an estimated cost of $12,000 for 8,000 yards of sod, based on the original
contractor price of $1.50 a yard of sod laid.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the finance department allocate $12,000 to the appropriate fund to pay
for the final landscaping and close out the project at Kohlman Overlook Park.
MEMORANDUM
tyr Manag r
irec ! r Pa ks and Recreation
kd\kop. mem
Agenda Ite'm 1
MEMORANDUM Action by Cnuncil.a
TO: City Manager Endorsea,,,,,,,,,�,,,
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner Mod3.fied,..,._,,,,.,�,
SUBJECT: AT &T Monopole Rejeeted._�,,,,
LOCATION: Aamco Transmissions —1905 E. County Road D Date
DATE: May 19, 1998
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Ron Mielke, of AT &T Wireless Services, is proposing to erect a 125- foot -tall monopole for cellular
telephone operations. AT &T proposes to place this monopole on the Aamco .Transmissions
property at 1905 E. County Road D on the north side of the building. Refer to pages 5 -8.
AT &T would lease a 29- by 30 -foot site from Aamco Transmissions for the proposed tower and an
adjacent 10- by 20 -foot equipment building. This building would be 10 feet tall and constructed of
precast concrete painted brown. Refer to page 9. Aamco Transmissions is light grey in color and
built of plain and split -face concrete block. The proposed building would contain all necessary
support equipment. There would not be a fence around this facility. AT &T proposes to landscape
their site. Refer to the landscape plan (separate attachment).
Requests
The applicant is requesting that the city approve:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a monopole and related equipment. Refer to the applicant's
letter on pages 10 -16.
2. The monopole and building design, the site plan and the landscape plan.
DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit
The three property owners that responded to our survey were in favor of this request. The Only
concern expressed was a hope that there would be no interference with the Communications
system at Town Center. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses all
telecommunications systems. This licensing requires that the proposed or new telecommunications
equipment not interfere with existing communications or electronics equipment. If there is
interference, then .the FCC requires the telecommunications company to adjust or shut down the
new equipment to correct the situation. Maplewood must be careful to not limit or prohibit a
proposed tower because of electronic interference. That is up to the FCC to monitor and regulate.
The city may only base their decision on land use and on health, safety and welfare concerns.
Design and Site Issues
The monopole meets the setback requirements specified in the code. The applicant should not
paint the monopole brown, however. Code requires that the color be light blue or grey to be less
noticeable.
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
May 12,1998: The community design review board (CDRB) recommended approval of the plans.
May 18, 1998: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 17 -18 approving a conditional use permit to allow a 125- foot -tall
telecommunications monopole and 10- by 20 -foot building for ground equipment at
1905 E. County Road D. The city bases this approval on the findings required by the ordinance
and is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The ro osed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval
p p
or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one
year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
This conditional use p ermit is conditioned upon AT &T allowing the co- location of other
providers ' telecommunications equipment on the proposed monopole with reaso nable lease
conditions.
B. Approve the site and tower design plans date- stamped April 3, 1998 and the landscaping and
buildin g elevations date - stamped May 5, 1998, for a 125- foot -tall telecommunications monopole
and a 10- by 20 -foot building for ground equipment on the north side of Aamco Transmissions
at 1905 E. County Road D. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to
the applicant doing the following:
1. Repeating this review in two years if the city has not issued permits for this project.
2. Substituting the brown color on the monopole with light blue or grey as the code requires.
3. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
K
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
I surveyed the 19 property owners within 350 feet of Aamco Transmissions for their opinion. p on about
this monopole proposal. Of the three replies, all were in favor.
In Favor
1. AT &T promised there would be no interference with existing services in the area. (Marco
Property Management representing Maplewood Town Center, 1845 E. County Road D)
2. It is next to freeway and should be a good location for one. (Store manager for Aamco
Transmissions, 1905 E. County Road D)
3. It looks Pike a good location next to the freeway. (Whitney &Whitney, 6449 Zinnia Lane N.)
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Proposed :lease area: 29- by 30 -feet (870 square feet)
Aamco Transmissions site: .69 acres
Existing land use: Aamco Transmissions
SURROUNDING LAND USES (around the proposed tower site)
North: 1 -694
South: Aamco Transmissions building
West: Vacant Egghead Software building and Best Buy
East: Goodyear Tire
PAST ACTIONS
January 13, 1997: The city council adopted the commercial use antenna and tower Ordinance.
July 28, 1997: The council held a public hearing to consider a request b American Portable
Telecom Inc. (APT) - - Y to put a 165 foot tall monopole on the MnDOT property at 1779 McMenem
After much testimony and discussion the Y
Street. Y e council tabled action on the proposal. The
council asked the applicant to provide more information to the city.
August 11, 1997: The council again considered APT's request to put a monopole on the MnDOT
property on McMenemy Street. At this meeting, the council denied APT's request.
March 30, 1998: The city council denied a request for a monopole at Western Hills Park for APT.
3
The city is presently reviewing a request by U.S. West to install a monopole on the Trinity Baptist
Church property at Highway 36 and Edgerton Street.
The.city council has approved four telecommunications monopoles '
p sin Maplewood. These include
the tower on the southwest corner of English Street and Gervais Avenue near Metcalf Mayflower,
yf ower,
monopoles on the US West
properties on Gervais Court and Carlton Street and the MCI tower near
Carver General Repair on Highwood Avenue.
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: BC (business commercial)
Zoning: BC
Ordinance Requirements
Section 36- 607(c)(1) allows monopoles by CUP in commercial districts provided they do not exceed
175 feet in height.
Findings for CUP Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council must base approval of a CUP on nine standards for
approval. Refer to the findings in the resolution on pages 17 -18.
Section 36- 605(a) states that the city council shall consider the following when reviewing a CUP for
a monopole:
1. The standards in the city code.
2. The recommendations of the planning commission and community design gn review board.
3. Effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and
Y general welfare of
residents of the surrounding areas.
4. The effect on property values.
5. The effect on the proposed use in the comprehensive p Ian.
p: sec351at &t. cu p
Attachments:
I. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Monopole Elevation
5. . Building Elevations
6. Applicant's letter of request dated April 13, 1998
7. CUP Resolution
8. Plans dated April 17, 1998 (separate attachments)
9. Landscape Plan date - stamped May 5, 1998 (separate attachment)
Attachment 1
IS HEIGHTS
r —.
S'i� ?
S WAM MEW A VE.
Y
VIKING DR.
SHUO" AVE. K
WWI
Tj
a. ,
11 4 �-
C
V
Q
r A VE. C
the
LOCATION MAP
5
li
N
i
GERYAtS
Attachment 2
p' 35G.b ,4.15 N 88' 1'03.6" E -- - --
07.3.4'
T o , H •
AAMCO
_TRANSMISSIONS 10 - sqo
1 1 1 !S 3S i
' °° � TIRES
MAPLEWOOD v GOODYEAR r .
PLUS — • .
TOWN CENTERIS) BEST MIDAS MUFFLER
SC - y 1 BU 1 a
3 1 5 Y �
M 1 ` , N a L1 4)
o �I �►' XINDER-
TOU 'LEY c o MMg= E L ZIEBART
EGGHEAD ) CARE
Psr� 9 #7. 7 5 SOFTWARE � 3 �
_
— 93, M - s 89 °59'4F" E 12 7 2. 76'
597:/3 .33 27/-0 7'
o
JUST FOR FEET
to
N
CIRCUIT CITY l3
is
C►� �
0 0
rn c
' N ,
i
••. Zo�i8L8
6 •t r• �8 .
Av vi
M
. 0 ^ K �.
0 h.
of
_ . R= 13.e4'
MAPLEWOOD MALL -j
• r o .
't
ms3
4 ,
PROPERTY LINE 1 ZONING MAP
0
4
N
i NC,-
C3 2
1
MAPLEWOOD 3.50 �..
' S. 04 �..Q COMMONS
s
2
l
i
_.
.
r * 40, ^ Vs-lis ..
oat 118.85' ,
•
_ 6- 6
Cq
-- - - --
- 40' Stands
- � -591 - -.•1-
N e w S o f
d 0 1 Co. E t. $K. 1Z .27 � 8k. 1'714 p.61
- - - - - - -- - - ---- ---- -- - -- -- - -- -
. P. T m 5s�o E s t.
,
- - - -- i+-
' N ,
i
••. Zo�i8L8
6 •t r• �8 .
Av vi
M
. 0 ^ K �.
0 h.
of
_ . R= 13.e4'
MAPLEWOOD MALL -j
• r o .
't
ms3
4 ,
PROPERTY LINE 1 ZONING MAP
0
4
N
i NC,-
Attachment 3
PROPOSED AT &T MONOPOLE SITE
i
• -rd7'13'
fti9t•N K '
W. i
Law pow
ROPOS i 0'x20' SHELTER
Ile
PROPOSE0 t
r
owl ;6n11ft- W. f
w ' '
I
I � ' I I �'' •O i
I 0 0,
i
Won �� O n .'�
- J I
AAM !
TRANSMISSIONS
I
r
, I 1 1 t�, 1 • I � I i�I r r ► i I i r e i I� .. H I
VOW rs �c�ol 1
I tons am"" ` I
r
it .♦ - f`
wwrt Ind it 1
• t 4r, �a1R --- - - - - --
-------------
—EAS _ G - ^_ _ T ,
% Log or
SITE PLAN
7
4
N
Attachment 4
ULTEIG � ENGINEERS, INC.
UL TEIG [NWNCERS SLO I EAST RIVER .ROAD, SUITE 308
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55421
PHONE (6 12) 571 —2500 FAX 1 (6 12) 571 — I 168
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
OF MINNESOTA, INC.
MAPLEWOOD SITE
NAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
k (TYP.)
ANTENNA SIZES
ANT, NO.
H
W
D
PD10177
8E"
10 3 /8 "
5
20' -0"
ENT SHELTER
SCALE' 1" = 20'-C"
n
Attachment 5
SEE SHT. . .
A5.0 • • .
DOOR OPENING •• • .
-7rs,* mr s:. , r- Z.-i.- t s : - r, P s s i r, s s -s•ss� - ZZ - s a� ••
SIDE VIEW
•.
OPTIONAL .
• DOOR LOCATION
7 L -IL
SIDE VIEW
END vIEw
END VIEW
f ZONAL
A
:ATION
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
9
Attachment 6
AT�T
Cellular Division
April 13, 1998
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Planning Commission
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Conditional Use Permit Application
Tireless Communication Antenna Site
1905 East County Road D.
Dear Honorable Mayor, Council Members, and Commissioners:
AT&T Wireless Services
2515 24th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55406
612 721 -1660
FAX 612 721 -4770
This letter accompanies an application for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a Wireless
Communication antenna site on land owned by Whitney Whitney Partnership. The roe is
Y Y p property rtY
located at 1905 East County Road D. and is zoned as a Business Commercial. The property is currently
being used by Thomas E. Whitney and Walter F. Whitney in conductin g business under the name of
AAarnco Transmission.
The request is being made in the name of AT &T Wireless Services of Minnesota, Inc. The fee
owner has consented to this application and have entered into a Lease Agreement with the applicant for a
portion of their property. Drawings and site surveys of the property accompany this letter.
The Proposed Use.
The site would be used by AT &T Wireless Services, one of the two companies who were
originally licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to provide essential cellular
communications services to the Twin Cities. The proposed project would include a steel monopole with
antennas attached to it and the construction of an equipment building to accommodate cellular radio and
switching equipment.
10
ZE
Recycled Paper
Wireless Communication Antenna Site
Maplewood, Minnesota
Page 2
The proposed location on the above mentioned property would be located to the rear of the
current building on the Northeasterly portion of the p
ro ert . This specific site was chosen based on the
p p Y
following criteria:
AT &T Wireless Services' engineering and system development needs
The need for improved cellular coverage as dictated by our customers
The proposed site will be contained within approximately a 29' X 30' area. Landscaping will be
placed within the Lease Tract area as per the requirements of the City of Maplewood. A site plan,,
p p
drawings, and photographs of the proposed project accompany this application.
The Monopole.
The proposed monopole will provide the support for the cellular antennas and related cabling
necessary to connect the antennas themselves to the radio equipment shelter. It is constructed of steel, is
completely self - supporting, and will be painted brown to blend in with the lighting standards south of
g g
the site located in the parking areas of Maplewood Mall.
We will provide detailed engineering data for permitting purposes to your Building Inspections
Department when this request is granted.
AT &T has specifically engineered this monopole to allow for potential future collocation by
other wireless providers.
Equipment Building.
The proposed equipment building will house radio, computer, and climate control equipment for
this site. The equipment is powered by 220 volt, single phase, AC electric. It will be connected to AT &T
Wireless Services central switching offices via traditional telephone lines. As a result no one will need
to be present at the site on a daily basis. There will only be an occasional visit (average of once a month)
for routine maintenance. The equipment produces no noise, smoke, flumes, g tare, or odor.
The building itself is approximately 10' wide, 20' long, and 10' high. It will be constructed in
such a way that it will look like the existing structures on the property, with the color matching the
existing building.
Antennas.
The antennas will be attached to the monopole and will transmit and receive the FM radio signals
that carry voice and data between the cellular system users and AT &T Wireless Services" central switch.
The physical size of the antennas depends on the type and manufacturer.
Wireless Communication Antenna Site
Maplewood, Minnesota
Page 3
The area in which cellular coverage is needed largely defines the required antenna height.
Naturally, topography and surrounding trees and buildings also play an important role in arriving at the
appropriate height. AT &T Wireless Services' engineers have determined that the height necessary at this
g g ary
location is 125 feet.
The Cellular Phone System.
Users of cellular telephone service include members of the business community as well as the
public sector. Commuters, doctors, salespeople, business owners and executives all benefit b using
g
cellular phones. Additionally, cellular telephones are used extensively by fire, police, and other public
safety officials and departments. The system allows police and others to conduct discreet communication
in the field, and it enables direct communication with individuals in need of assistance even when a
traditional telephone is unavailable.
Cellular phone users can contact "911 " to report accidents, fires, or other emergencies without
first having to search for a telephone. Mr. James R. Beutels acher, 9 -1 -1 Project Manager for
p J g
Minnesota, wrote that "the unimpeded growth of cellular service is an important adjunct to 9 -1 -1
emergency reporting."
Cellular is a low -power system. The amount of energy generated from a single cellular phone
channel is approximately 100 watts. This is less energy than is generated by the typical cordless
telephone which is used in many homes today.
The Question of Interference.
The cellular phone system operates on a specific set of channels set aside by the Federal
Communications Commission. The filtering of spurious signals is very tightly controlled. Cellular
telephones operate within a strictly regulated set of allotted frequencies between 825 and 845 megahertz
(MHz) and between 870 and 890 MHz. AT &T Wireless Services is currently licensed to operate in over
100 major markets nationwide with hundreds of antennas. There has not been any instance of television
or radio interference reported.
All AT &T Wireless Services sites must be operated in accordance with our FCC license to
provide cellular service in this area. Mr. Albert S. Jarratt, Jr., Engineer in Charge of the St. Paul Field
g g
Office, Field Operations Bureau of the FCC, confirmed that the FCC has not received any complaints of
interference by cellular phone transmissions with home electronic entertainment equipment in any of the
.five states in which Mr. Jarratt's office has jurisdiction.
12
Wireless Communication Antenna Site
Maplewood, Minnesota
Page 4
The Cellular Grid.
Cellular service provides subscribers with highly portable phone service by developing a grid of
radio cells arranged in a geographically hexagonal pattern. Each "cell" is created by an antenna which
serves as the link between the customer and the system while the customer is within that particular cell.
As callers move from one cell to the next, their calls are switched, or "handed off," to the next cell's
antenna site.
Each cell can only handle a finite number of calls at any one time. As the number of customers
increases, the grid must be changed to handle the increasing umber of calls. This usually means that
g Y
more cells need to be created within the same geographical area, resulting in a new grid pattern of
smaller cells. This need for more cellular calling capacity originally brought this antenna site to this
location. Accompanying this letter is information that more thoroughly explains the cellular system.
g Y p Y
While the area in which cellular coverage is needed largely defines the required antenna height,
topography also plays a role in arriving at the appropriate height for the tower. This is true because
cellular telephone signals cannot travel through large structures or through the earth.
One of the keys to cellular engineering is to take care to design each cell to be the proper size. If
a cell is too large, it will interfere with the operation of neighboring cells, and callers will hear other
conversations or "cross- talk." If a cell is too small, some areas between cells will be left without any
service and callers will not be able to use their phones. If a caller is in a valley or if a hill lies between
the caller and the cell's antenna, the area acts as if there is no antenna at all. When topography comes
into play, cellular telephone service can be both difficult to provide and frustrating to use.
Cellular engineers now employ the use of directional antennas in an effort to accommodate the
topography. By increasing the elevation of the antennas and tiltin g the antennas downward the cellular
signal is projected over the top of hills and down into valleys without increasing the cell's overall size.
Indeed, this technology will be employed at this particular site.
Requirements for the City of Maplewood.
For a new personal wireless communication tower or monopole, the applicant shall document to
the city that the proposed telecommunications equipment cannot be accommodated on an existing or
approved tower or commercial building within one -half mile radius because of one or more of the
following:
a. The planned equipment would exceed the structural capacity of the existing or approved
tower or commercial building. The only existing tower that is within one -half mile radius of
13
Wireless Communication Antenna Site
Maplewood, Minnesota
Page S
the proposed site are those owned by NSP. The high power transmission towers that exist to
the south do not meet the standards for proper Radio Frequency coverage because of their
height and the close proximity to the high power transmission wires.
b. The planned equipment would cause interference with other existing or planned
equipment at the tower or building. The close proximity of the high power transmission
wires with the proposed antennas would cause Radio Frequency interference.
c. Existing or approved structures and commercial buildings within one -half mile radius
cannot or will not reasonably accommodate the planned equipment at a height necessary to
function. In order to meet the proper separation from the transmission lines, the antennas
would have to be placed at a lower height which would not give the adequate coverage that is
needed.
d. For residential district sites, the applicant must demonstrate, by providing achy -wide
coverage /interference and capacity analysis, that the location of the antennas as ro osed is
p p
necessary to meet the frequency reuse and spacing needs of the communication service
system, and to provide adequate coverage and capacity to areas that cannot be adequately
served by locating the antennas in a less restrictive district or on existin g structure. The
proposed site is located on property zoned Business Commercial, so this section does not
apply.
e. For all commercial wireless telecommunications service towers, a letter of intent
committing the tower, the owner and his or her successors to allow the shared use of the
tower if an additional user agrees in writing to meet reasonable term and conditions for
shared use. The monopole for this proposed location is being designed to allow for
additional users as it is depicted in the zoning ordinance for collocation. AT &T Wireless
Services of Minnesota, Inc. is open to collocation and is willing to work with other
Companies that offer wireless services.
The Conditional Use Permit.
The City of Maplewood, in its Conditional Use Permit Application and zoning ordinances set
forth the following standards by which the City Council shall approve, amend, or deny a conditional use
permit:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity
with the City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances. One of the purposes and intents of the
Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan is to provide essential services to the ublic including
p � g
communication services. For the reasons set forth in greater detail above, a cell site in this general
location is necessary to provide adequate cellular telephone service to this area of the City and
14
Wireless Communication Antenna Site
Maplewood, Minnesota
Page 6
surrounding areas. Allowing the cell site to be located here, subject to reasonable conditions, is
consistent with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. The
Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Business Commercial uses. The cell site is consistent with
and serves this type of use. The use is therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and
p Code of
Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. The
communication tower being a commercial use will not change the existing planned character of the
g or p
surrounding area. The area to the West, East and South of the proposed site are zoned Business
Commercial and the property to the North abuts the right of way for I -694. The use is consistent
g y with
the general area and should not have any affect against the properties.
3. The use would not depreciate property values. AT &T Wireless Services has installed over 100
cell sites throughout the state. In no instance has there ever been an evidence that a cell site has caused
used
any depreciation of surrounding property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operations
that. would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a nuisance to any p erson or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water run -off, vibration, general
.unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. The cell site that is being proposed will not
gp ro p
cause any hazardous or detrimental activities to any person at the site or surrounding area. All
equipment is self contained within the building which will not create any noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor,
fumes, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. The site has its own access from
County Road D, which will provide ingress and egress to the property. As stated previously, site visits
will be infrequent which will eliminate any traffic congestion or interference with traffic on the
surrounding public streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate facilities and services, including streets, police and re
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. The only public utility
and service need of this proposed site is for electrical and telephone services, which are ample for AT &T
W
• p ireless Services needs at this location. The proposed site has access by a service road. Because of the
computerized operation of this technology, site visits will be infrequent, approximately one visit per
month, which will eliminate any traffic congestion or interference with traffic on the surrounding public
streets.
gp
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. As it was
stated earlier, the site would have access that is already constructed. The site visits will be infrequent,
15
Wireless Communication Antenna Site
Maplewood, Minnesota
Page 7
approximately one visit per month, plus there is no need of public facilities other than power and
p
telephone service, which is already present on the property.
8. The use would minimize the preservation o and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
.f p is
features into the development design. Because of the nature of the proposed site minimal construction
p p
will take place which will not cause any damage to the site or surroundin g area.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. This s site was proposed because of
the existing structures that are near the proposed site. To the south of the ro osed site there are light
p p g
standards that are located within the parking lot of Maplewood Mall. The height of these light standards
g g
are approximately 125 feet. This is the same height that is being proposed for the monopole to g p p p help
replicate the surrounding structures. This will help to preserve the visual impact of the site.
10. The City Council may waive any of the above requirements for a ubl is building or utility
p g rY
structure, provided the Council shall first make a determination that the balancin g o fp ublic interest
between governmental units of the state would be best served by such waiver.
The granting of the CUP will alleviate problems for AT &T Wireless Services and its customers
s omers
in this area, including city and county departments of public safety.
Conclusion.
This letter should serve to better explain our application and to answer some of ur questions.
y
If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me at 612- 844 -6741. I as well as other
representatives of AT &T Wireless Services will be in attendance at the Planning Commission and Ci
• . g City
Council meetings to address any additional questions that you may have. AT &T Wireless Services
appreciates the assistance that we have already received from the City's staff , and we look forward to
working with you to better serve the area.
Thank you for your consideration.
Best
Ronald L. Mielke
Real Estate Manager
Enclosures
16
Attachment 7
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Ronald L. Mielke, of AT &T Wireless Services, applied for a conditional use permit
to install a 125- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and a related . equipment building.
g
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1905 E. County Road D. The legal description is:
LOT 4, BLOCK 1, TOUSLEY COMMERCIAL PARK, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On May 18, 1998, the planning commission considered this request and recommended that
the city council approve it.
2. The city council held a public hearing on June 8, 1998. City staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
17
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval
or. the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one
year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
This conditional use permit is conditioned upon AT &T allowing the co- location of other
providers' telecommunications equipment on the proposed monopole with reasonable lease
conditions.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1 1998.
M
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MAY 18 1998
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A AT & T Monopole Conditional Use Permit (1905 County Road D East)
Ken Roberts associate p Tanner, presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts said that AT & T was
skin council approval of the conditional use permit for the monopole and their equipment, and
asking pp Id be considerin
approval of their design plans. The planning commission would the conditional considering
.the
permit as the review board has already reviewed this item for the design elements.
Commissioner Rossbach asked staff what the design review board decided about the painting of
g
the building. Staff said that because the surface of the building is an exposed aggregate
concrete the design review board did not require them to paint it.
Mr. Peter Beck, representing AT & T Wireless Services, said that they were in agreement with
the staff conditions with the one exception being the color of the building. Mr. Beck said that the
Goodyear building next to this site was also brown in color.
Commissioner Frost moved the lannin commission recommend adoption of the resolution
p 9
which approves the conditional use permit to install a 125- foot -tall telecommunications monopole
and a 10 by g 20 -foot building for ground equipment at 1905 E. County Road D. The city bases
approval on the findings required by the ordinance and is subject to the following conditions:
1.
All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
construction must be substantial)
2. The proposed con Y started within one year of council approval
or the p ermit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
This conditional use P ermit is conditioned upon AT &T allowing the co- location of other providers'
telecommunications equipment on the proposed monopole with reasonable lease conditions.
Commissioner Ledvina seconded. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOA
183 C RD
COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA
MAY 12 1998
D. Telecommunications Monopole, 1905 E. County Road D (Aamco Transmissions) AT&T Wireless Services
Peter Beck and Ron Mielke, both representing A
P g T & T Wireless Services, were
present. Mr. Beck said that they could aint the of
P pole any color the Board wanted but
it would
be hard to change the color of the existing building '
g g because of its surface
material is exposed aggregate and wont take paint ve ry well.
Boardmember Robinson asked the applicant if the •
PP y had .searched to see if there was
a collocation already in the area that they could use instead of installing stalling their own
pole. Mr. Beck said they had because it was one oft
he requirements of the city's
new ordinance.
Boardmember Robinson asked the applicant that if
PP someone collocates with them
where would their equipment go in this space. Mr. Beck '
es of P said there were two different
types providers. Another cellular provider like AT & T would have '
merit building to install a similar
equi
P g to theirs. A PCS provider would be able to install a 6-foot
c square
to 10 -foot square equipment abinet which would be located somewhere appropriate
on the leased property.
Boardmember Erickson asked the applicant if
Pp there was a fence proposed around this
site. Mr. Mielke said that they were not worried about v •
vandalism. The building is a
totally secured building. The landscaping round the building '
g ding rt will help keep the
building from view. Mr. Mielke said that they would be maintain' •
maintaining the property with
services that would replace shrubs and water the g rass.
Boardmember Shankar moved that the Community Design
site. Y sign Review Board approve the
and tower design plans date - stamped April 3, 1998 and the landscaping and
building elevations date- stamped May 5, 1998 for a 125-foot-tall •
. telecommunications
monopole and a 10- by 20 -foot building for ground equipment on '
the north side of
Aamco Transmissions at 1905 E. County Road D. Approval is based on the findings
required by code and subject to the applicant doing the following:
1. Repeating this review in two years if the city as no
project.
y t issued permits for this
2. Substituting the brown color on the '
requires.
tower with light blue or grey as the code
3. All work shall follow the approved I
PP .pans. The director of community develo merit
may approve minor changes. P
Boardmember Robinson seconded.
. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
Agenda Item H2
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DATE:
City Manager
Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit and Parkin Lot Expansion
H g p
Hermanson Dental
1055 E. Highway 36
May 19, 1998
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Tom Hermanson, of Hermanson Dental, is ro osin to:
p p g
Action by Counci3
Endorsed,..,,,
Mo dif i e d.•.►.......,.,.
Rejecte
Dat e
1. Build a new parking lot on his adjacent lot west of his building t 10
g 55 E. Highway 36.
2. Regrade and restripe his existing parking lots b adding 9 p g y parking on the west side of his
building and eliminate a two- foot -tall retaining wall in the arkin lot p g north of the building.
3. Build a holding pond to collect runoff for pretreatment before it flows into the wetland.
4. Close the existing curb cut at the intersection of Cypress Street and Gervais Avenue.
5. Increase the number of parking spaces from 112 to 161.
Refer to the enclosed maps on pages 5 -7 and plans (separate attachment).
Requests
Mr. Hermanson is requesting that the city council approve the following:
: g
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) to increase the impervious surface area on his property to
67 percent. The ordinance allows a maximum of 60 percent if the applicant provides a
method for pretreating storm runoff. Refer to the applicant's letter on pages 8 -9.
2. Approval of the site plan.
BACKGROUND
Hermanson Dental Site
September 7, 1972: The city council approved plans for the original building.
August 22 1988: The city g
g ty council approved a CUP for an addition on the west side of the building.
g
Other CUP Approvals
December 14, 1992: The city council granted a conditional use permit (CUP) to Maplewood
Toyota allowing them to enlarge their parking lot. This expansion increased their impervious
surface from 66 percent to 68.7 percent. The code allowed a maximum of 40 percent.
October 10, 1994: The council granted a CUP to Lakeview Lutheran Church to enlarge their building.
This addition increased the impervious surface from 38 percent to 40 percent. The code allowed a
maximum of 30 percent.
DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit
The proposed increase in the impervious surface area will not be a problem. The city engineer has
reviewed this plan and determined that the adjacent wetlands would not be negatively impacted.
The o osed pretreatment pond would handle the runoff from the proposed parking lot as well as
p p
pretreat runoff from the existing parking lot that currently flows directly into the wetland. The parking
situation will improve and elimination of the curb cut at the road curvature will improve traffic flow on
the streets.
Site and Screening Considerations
The ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requires that there be six handicap- accessible parking
stalls for the 161 parking stalls. The applicant should revise the plan showing these spaces.
The city code states that the applicant should install a fence or evergreen plantings north of the
proposed parking lot. The code requires screening to be six feet tall and 80 percent opaque. The
community design review board (CDRB) may waive the screening requirement if they determine that
screening is not needed or would not protect surrounding property values. Staff recommends that
the CDRB waive the requirement for additional screening. The grade elevation of the proposed
parking lot is substantially lower than the home site to the north. Screening would not be beneficial
since the neighbor would be able to look over the top of the fence at the cars in the parking lot. The
applicant proposes to leave the trees on the north side of the proposed driveway that would provide
the best screening in this case.
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
May 12, 1998: The CDRB recommended approval of the plans.
May 18,1998: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP.
2
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 10 -11 approving a conditional use permit to expand the parking
lot at 1055 E. Highway 36. This permit allows an impervious surface area coverage for this
property to 67 percent, seven percent over that allowed by ordinance. Approval is based on
the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The property owner shall maintain the existing trees and vegetative screening north of the
proposed parking lot.
B. Approve the plans date - stamped April 27, 1998, for the parking lot expansion at Hermanson
Dental, 1055 E. Highway 36. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. Before the city issues a building permit, the applicant shall revise the site plan providing
for six handicap - accessible parking spaces as required by the ADA.
3. The property owner shall maintain the existing trees and vegetative screening north of
the proposed parking lot.
4. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
3
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 3.44 acres
Existing land use: Hermanson Dental
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Gervais Avenue and single dwellings
South: Undeveloped city open space land
West: Undeveloped city open space land
East: Hermanson Dental's existing parking lot
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: M -1 (light manufacturing)
Zoning: M -1
Ordinance Requirements:
Section 36- 566(a)(2)(4) of the city code allows a maximum impervious surface area of 60 percent
for this property, provided the property owner installs a method for pretreating storm runoff.
Findings for CUP Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city may approve a CUP, based on the nine standards in the
resolution on pages 10 -11.
p:sec9\hermson.cup
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Applicant's letter dated April 27, 1998
5. CUP Resolution
6. Plans stamped April 27, 1998 (separate attachment)
Il
Attachment 1
s
U
t;
COUNTY ROAD C m
Nil T N E
v► 1
Cr 0 o
PALM �^ t` z W � z
P',�,,% CV D �fN�L i
�T � cc ° Cr W
CONDOR Cd� C NOR oa
A VE . AVE.
CT. DEMO AVE. Off' BROOKS AvE.
o
� � P
W
BROOKS `'' W �° �^ SEX TANT
CY, S a 3
AVE.
XTANT A
GERVAIS AVE. S CERVAtS
l
GRANOVIEW AVE.
00 VIKING DR.
Ar
SMERREN AVE.
Kn 1ife Re
v COP COPE L`=
D LARK CT. � AVE.. ►-
Keller
VIKING DR• Lake o CO. RD. LAURIE R0. `
= W z
�� J . $ �� L.ELAND RD. o SAND URST
.2, LAURIE CT. °�' ..._z z W
J'' Q-• < r JUNCTION AVE. �`' B
BURKf C7. p0 o rotb+r d L A&
� Bi1RKE V � 6 RKf AVE. m w BURKE AVE. A&
� "" (1) CHAMBERS ST :) ( �
AY E. z ELDRIDGE AV ,� ° A(p�, � � ELDR IDLE AVE. 31
BELMONT AVE.
Oehr1i ne N eE L.MONT vRSE
r p j e Cry GOLF CO SKILL 40 ^V E. SKILL MAN AVE.
AVE. W 1 / SKAIAAN AV. KENW 000 KELl'ER
LN. j pJ'i V R �Po�r#c
AN AV.
CD � � W
W W trQi) CD V1
Edon < W rn CA Z AV
Po+* a v FROST
OSELAWN
�n a W
BELLWOOD AVE. Ix ? z �'
AVE. W FE NTON AVE.
W R s � �
�'w z n U IEAV S
—
SUMMER z 3 W o ° •
CT. N }.: # a FRISSIE AVE• cn = a�
U W � Z � � < t�
8 Y a � 5
Y S� O,Q r RIP LEY z
F Wakefield
RIP'I.EY AVE. Gotee� Y W c o
�Q-• 50 PH 111. � � F .;
0 u x N S MIA AVE
m KINGSTON<AVE. Joke o� 3i z ICE 1V
w PRICE W AVE• ' `` j = �' �
cn H �� Phole� o < W
W a Q
61
SAINT PAUL
LOCATION MAP
5
4
N
Attachment 2
o
mo
HOUSE (UNDER
CONSTUCTION)
b 42ec
G
MAPLEWOOD
OPEN SPACE
PROPERTY
1 I ._
ALLEN
TWIN CITY DIAMOND
VENDING VOGEL
PAINTS M I
HERMANSON
BUILDING'S
P-1
� t
\ t
( - 4n 7.51
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
PROPOSED PARKING LOT EXPANSION AREA
4
N
t
s .79
,10
'
I
L
�
. ?
v
�,�f
3►
4-3,So
•
ALLEN
TWIN CITY DIAMOND
VENDING VOGEL
PAINTS M I
HERMANSON
BUILDING'S
P-1
� t
\ t
( - 4n 7.51
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
PROPOSED PARKING LOT EXPANSION AREA
4
N
Attachment 3
W I f
a; IL 414 GGMA
I N-.CA
GRAVAS
�'+...•'.� - _ � I •� er r •r.-" Q -� �
• rte `� "�..•� "� •�• _. • ,.
SITE PLAN
4
N
MIDWEST
Attachment 4
Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc.
199 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, Mn. 55433
Ph. 612 -786 -6909 Fax: 612- 786 -9208 Toll Free 1- 888 -786 -6909
Community Development Department
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
April 27, 1998
RE: Hermanson Dental Parking Lot Expansion
Hermanson Dental located at 1055 East Highway 36 in Maplewood is interested in expanding
the on -site parking space for its employees and customers. In order to accomplish this goal, land
was purchased to the west of the existing facility. Midwest Land Surveyors &Civil Engineers
has been retained to design this addition. The current on -site parking is basically divided into
three areas. The front of the building is accessed off of the frontage road along the North side of
- State Trunk Highway No. 36 this lot has one entrance and is separated from the frontage road by
a fairly deep drainage swale. The second parking area is located on the north or rear of the
building. This lot is accessed off of Gervais Avenue at the northeast end of the property. The
third parking area is located at the northwest corner of the property. Due to the grade sloping
dramatically from the east to the west a retaining wall drops the grade to this parking lot. The
access point for this lot is located at the intersection of Gervais Avenue and Cypress Street.
Gervais Avenue is occasionally used for overflow parking.
The planned expansion will provide for a total of 161 parking spaces. Included in the expansion
plan is a water treatment pond which will remove sediment prior to discharge to the wetland
located south of the proposed expansion. The pond will also control the rate at which the run off
will be discharged to the wetland. The area of runoff treated by this pond is shown on the plan
and includes the rear portion of the building roof area, the rear parking lot area, the entire
additional property purchased for parking lot expansion and a portion of the single family lots to
the north. Currently this area discharges to the wetland without treatment.
The existing topography of the area of the parking expansion slopes from the north and east to
the _south where there is a class 5 wetland as delineated by Pat Conrad of Ramsey Washington
Metro Watershed. The vegetation consists of underbrush and trees but no quality trees.
Construction would require clearing trees and brush on about 75% of the expansion site for both
parking and ponding. The North 38 feet of this area would remain natural and provide a buffer
for the single family residence directly to the north. The proposed parking area is substantially
lower in elevation than the residential lot to the north. This difference in grade provides an
additional screening and buffering effect.
APR 2.71998
The maximum allowable percentage of impervious area within a shoreland boundary is 60
when ponding is provided. What we are proposing raises the percent impervious to 67% which
is not a significant amount considering the benefits that are provided by the proposed pond
which will hel maintain the character of the existing wetland by pretrea ' . g the runoff that
P
flows thru it and controlling the rate at which that runoff is introduced to it.
The parking lot expansion would ease congestion along Gervais Avenue due to cars that are
being parked along the street. The expansion plan includes plans to close a curb cut at the
intersection of Gervais Avenue and Cypress Street, this would provide a safer situation along
Gervias by minimizing access points. Another key design feature related to safety is the
connection of the existing parking lot located in front of the building and the lot located in the
rear of the building. This connection allows access to both sides of the building from either
entrance. If a police or fire emergency were to occur the specific location and access to be used
would not an issue for prompt response.
The. redesign of the rear parking lot to one continuous space rather than its current multi level
design will provide a more aesthetically pleasing appearance, an easier space to maintain, a more
efficient use of space. The design provides safer access for the public and emergency vehicles.
The location of the expansion will be completely surrounded by vegetation and screened from
neighboring properties and preservation of the site's natural features has been incorporated into
the design. The expansion would not change the planned character of the surrounding area. No
additional cost for public utilities would be created.
We would recommend approval of the Conditional use Permit for the expansion of the parking
lot for Hermanson Dental noting that the owner and designer has made every effort to blend the
goals of Hermanson Dental and the City of Maplewood into a plan that benefits both the owner
and the public.
MIDWEST LAND SURVEYORS & CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC.
M VL.W✓��
John M. Anderson, P.E.
Attachment 5
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Tom Hermanson, of Hermanson Dental, applied for a conditional use permit to
expand his parking lot, thereby increasing his impervious surface area.
WHEREAS, Section 36- 566(a)(2)(4) of the city code allows a maximum impervious surface area
of 6.0 percent for this property.
WHEREAS, this permit allows an impervious surface area of the site of 67 percent —seven
percent over that allowed by the code.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1055 E. Highway 36. The legal description is:
That part of the West 171.32 feet of the East 662.32 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9,
township 29, range 22 lying Northerly of State Trunk Highway No. 36 -118, subject to the right of
way of Gervais Avenue over the Northerly 33 feet thereof, according to the United States
Government Survey thereof.
AND
That part of the West 77.20 feet of the East 739.52 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9,
Township 29, Range 22, lying Northerly of State Trunk Highway No. 36 -118, Ramsey County,
Minnesota, according to the United States Government Survey thereof.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On May 18, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
permit.
2. On June 8, 1998, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone
at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
10
4. The use would not involve an activity, roc •
Y y, p ess, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental disturbing
because of e � g or cause a nuisance
to any person or property,
excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, eneral unsightliness, g g ess, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate . only inimal vehicular Y a traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion -or unsafe access. on existing or ro osed streets.
p p
6. The use would be served b adequate public facilities •
Y q p c and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewers systems, s, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional • '
nal costs for public facilities . or services.
8. The use would maximize the reservation of
p and incorporate the sites natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental
effects.
10. The quality of the adjacent wetland will improve due t
p o the pretreatment of runoff.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1.
All construction shall follow the site plan approved b the city. The '
Y y e director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially tarted within one e year of council approval
or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one y e a r
.
I The property owner shall maintain the existing rees and vegetative
proposed parking lot.
g g e screening north of the
4. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on
1998.
11
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MAY 18 1998
B. Hermanson Dental Conditional Use Permit (1055 Highway 36 East)
Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. The applicant is requesting a
conditional use permit to increase the impervious surface area on his property to 67 percent and
approval of his site plan. The community design review board has already considered the site
plan. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to the conditions in the
staff report.
Commissioner Rossbach asked staff how they determined that the runoff wouldn't be detrimental
to the wetlands. Ken Haider, city engineer, said he checked with several sources and found that
the proposed Hermanson pond exceeded the typically accepted standards which look at the
percentage of the pond area versus the entire drainage area. Mr. Haider thought the applicant
did a nice job of trying to adjust the drainage characteristics of the existing parking lot and bring
that through the pond to clean the water before it was discharged to the wetland. Commissioner
Rossbach asked staff how the rate of flow was going to be controlled. Mr. Haider said that the
outlet pipe is a 12 inch pipe and that there is a restriction with a 10 inch pipe inside the 12 inch
pipe to neck it down to control the rate of discharge. That rate was based on the discharge for a
100 year event so that we do maximize the storage at that level of rainfall.
John Anderson, representing Midwest Land Surveyors who are the engineers on the project, and
Tom Hermanson, the applicant, were present to answer questions. Commissioner Rossbach
had some questions about the area that was going to drain through the pond.
Commissioner Ledvina asked if the screening recommendation was still part of the application.
Staff said it was but it would be changing before it goes to the council based on the review board
decision that no screening would be required along the north side of the arkin lot.
p 9
commissioner Pearson moved to recommend the adoption of the resolution for a conditional use
permit to expand the parking lot at 1055 E. Highway 36. This permit allows an impervious
surface area of 67 percent —seven percent over that allowed by the code. Approval is subject to
the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval
or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The quality of the adjacent wetland will improve due to the pretreatment of runoff
Commissioner Frost seconded.
Commissioner Rossbach asked if there was a buffer required next to a Class .5 wetland. Staff
said there was no buffer requirement. Commissioner Rossbach asked that if the existing
vegetation fills the role of screening are there any requirements that this vegetation has to be
maintained just as if they planted the screen. Staff did not have a revised report from the review
board on this. Commissioner Rossbach stated that he would be voting against the plan because
he felt it was important that there always be a vegetative screen maintained between the
residential area and the commercial area. Commissioner Pearson asked staff if the maintenance
of the vegetative screen could be added as 4 a. to the conditions of this resolution. Staff said it
would be up to the city council to decide whether they think it is necessary or not. The screening
code does require that it be 80% opaque and at least six feet high. The review board's position
was that if the grade was already ten feet high at the house level, what was the point of having
plantings six feet high. Commissioner Rossbach said that in the winter time there won't be any
leaves on the trees and it wouldn't be 80% opaque at that time and even if that was fine there is
nothing that makes them maintain it.
Commissioner Rossbach offered .a friendly amendment to add a No. 5 to the conditions which
would stipulate that the vegetative trees must be maintained on the north side of the parking lot to
an 80% opaque condition, to a height of six feet. Commissioner Pearson agreed to the friendly
amendment.
.Ayes— Fischer, Frost, Knoll, Pearson, Rossbach,
Thompson
Nay - Ledvina
The motion passed.
MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MAY 12 1998
C. Parking Lot Expansion, 1055 E. Highway 36 -- Hermanson Dental
John Anderson, representing Midwest Land Surveyors, and Tom Hermanson, owner
of Hermanson Dental, were present. Mr. Anderson asked if the code required that
they handicap -accessible six handica - accessible parking spaces. Staff said they checked the ADA
chart and it said six stalls were needed for that number of spaces.
Mr. Anderson asked if the screening was still needed with the grade differences and
tree growth between the single- family Lot located north and the proposed new parking
lot. Staff agreed that there doesn't seem to be any basis for requiring an additional
screen. Staff said that the recommendation was a code requirement but that the
Community Design Review Board may waive this requirement if they determine that
screening would not protect surrounding property values.
Boardmember Ledvina asked the applicant if when they do the grading of the pond
they would be clearing out the debris and if the area marked as a wetland would stay
natural. Mr. Anderson said that they would clear out most of the debris and still keep
this area as natural as possible when they grade.
Boardmember Ledvina asked staff if the pond meets NURP standards. Staff said the
city engineer reviewed it and was satisfied. Mr. Anderson said that the total sediment
9
removal was designed based on the comments the city engineer gave them.
Boardmember Ledvina asked if it would have a skimmer device. Mr. Anderson said
there would be a weir on the outlet that would trap floating objects.
Boardmember Ledvina said that the drainage structure on the west side of the
building was not functioning properly and needed to be corrected. Mr. Anderson said
that their plan would correct this because a large amount of drainage in the rear will
be redirected to the pond.
Boardmember Ledvina moved that the Community Design Review Board approve the
fans date- stamped April 27, 1998, for the parking lot expansion at Hermanson
p
Dental, 1055 E. Highway 36, subject to the following conditions as amended:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Before the city issues a building permit, the applicant shall revise the site plan
providing rovidin for six handicap- accessible parking spaces as required by the ADA.
3. The property owner shall maintain the existing trees and vegetative screening
north of the proposed parking lot.
4. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
Boardmember Shankar seconded. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
Agenda Item f43
MEMORANDUM Action by Council:
TO: City Manager
Endorse
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
Modifie
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit – Billboard Relocation at Metcalf Mayflower Re j eote
LOCATION: 12.55 E. Highway 36 Rate
DATE: June 1, 1998
INTRODUCTION
Request
Mr. Chris McCarver, of Universal Outdoor, Inc., is requesting approval of a conditional use permit
(CUP) to relocate a billboard on the Metcalf Mayflower property, 1255 E. Highway 36. Refer to the
maps on pages 4 -6 and the applicant's letter on page 7. The billboard is currently placed along
Metcalf Mayflower's Highway 36 frontage near the site of their recently approved multi- tenant
building. Refer to the site plan on page 6.
The applicant is requesting a CUP to move the billboard to a new location on the site with a pole
placement 20 feet to the west of the existing Metcalf Mayflower building. The leading edge of the
billboard would be 11 feet from the building. The proposed billboard would be a 35- foot -tail,
two -sided sign and could be viewed from the east over the top of the building. Each face would
measure 10.5- by 36- feet -378 square feet.
Reason for the Request/Code Requirements
The billboard Ordinance requires a CUP if the required setbacks would not be met. As stated, the
proposed billboard would have an 11 -foot setback from the building— 89 feet less than required.
The sign code requires the following billboard setbacks:
From an intersection – 300 feet
From a building or on -site sign – 100 feet
From a lot line –10 feet
BACKGROUND
Metcalf Mayflower Property
February 23, 1998: The city council approved building plans for Metcalf Mayflower to build a
55,000 square -foot, One -story multi - tenant office /warehouse building east of their present building.
The building would be used for office, warehouse, manufacturing and retail purposes. The council
also approved a parking reduction to have 38 fewer parking spaces than code requires. The code
requires 176 and the applicant would provide 138.
March 30, 1998: The city council revised Condition Three of their previous approval to state that
before getting the first certificate of occupancy for the building, the applicant shall remove the
billboard from the site or obtain a CUP for relocating it on the property. Previously, the condition
had required the billboard removal or the applicants obtaining a CUP for relocation before the
issuance of a building permit.
Other Billboard Actions
December 10, 1984: The city council denied a CUP request for 3M National Advertising to install a
360 - square -foot, two- sided billboard on the south side of Highway 36 on the present site of the
MDG Properties building, 1387 Cope Avenue. 3M was requesting the CUP because their proposed
billboard would have been 440 feet from the nearest dwelling to the south. The code requires a
500 foot separation. The council gave no findings for denial.
DISCUSSION
The city council should deny this request. In reviewing the standards for CUP approval, it is clear
that the billboard would not be located to be in conformity with the code because of its substantially
reduced setback. With an 11 -foot setback, the proposed billboard would be too close to the
building. The required 100 -foot setback is needed to avoid an appearance of crowding and clutter.
In the past, billboards have not been perceived by former Maplewood City Councils to be a land
use they wish to promote and encourage. The last time the city reviewed such a request, the
council denied the billboard installation along Highway 36. This billboard would have met all
spacing requirements along the highway but would have been too close to the residences to the
south.
COMMITTEE ACTION
May 12,1998: The community design review board (CDRB) recommended denial of this request.
May 26, 1998: The CDRB recommended denial of this request again. Mr. Metcalf had requested
this second review by the board in order to present his reasons for the CUP. He was not present at
the first meeting on May 12.
RECOMMENDATION
Deny the conditional use permit for the relocation of the billboard on the Metcalf Mayflower
property, 1255 E. Highway 36. Denial is based on the following reasons:
1. The proposed billboard would not be located to be in conformity with the city code of ordinances
because of its substantially reduced setback from the Metcalf Mayflower building. The applicant
proposed an 11 -foot setback —the code requires 100 feet.
2. The proposed billboard would appear to crowd the building and, therefore, give a cluttered
appearance.
3. The city previously denied a conditional use permit for a billboard that would have had less
aesthetic impact along Highway 36 than the proposed billboard.
2
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 5.47 acres
Existing land use: Metcalf Mayflower
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Gervais Avenue and undeveloped M1 (light manufacturing) property
South: Highway 36, Northern Hydraulics, Oasis Market and Handy Hitch
West: Asphalt Driveway Company and U -haul Self Storage
East: English Street, Vomela Specialty Company and Truck Utilities
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: M1
Zoning: M1
p:sec9lbillbord.cup
Attachments:
1. Location'Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Applicant's Letter date - stamped April 6, 1998
3
Attachment 1
.►.+.rw n� C.
0 W a 5 i W I
1
%W 1 / o
I/orkh nd RAAfSEY
Kohkmn � � � I/ COUNTY
�l.oke COURT
V
\ J ' � t; � KoHw�w
�J KOHLWW AVE.
wry Rwa � c � � 1 � A � AVE.
5HERREfi AVE. IN
Knuc *ad Lake
P►W' V.
COPE AV
Keller r
-+
T.
s
CGNNpR Cd��
c1.
°C %o LARK AVE
a AVE � AV
E�wu. Ftc.
OENIOMT
T. �pitf AVE.
�� BROWCS AVE.
AVE.
G� BROOKS
�� 5 ��
�
W
� �
SEX TANT
AE EL rvf-
��,M AVE
AVE.
�
RD. c�
z _
�
cv
z
GERVNS A
> CERNAIS
GRANDV" AVE.
� CT'
WING DR.
5HERREfi AVE. IN
Knuc *ad Lake
E �=� AVE.
COPE AV
Keller r
-+
LARK
WPI
°C %o LARK AVE
a AVE � AV
rn
Lake l
CO. <
RD• c
t; 6
v WRtE RD. «vooe LAIRI ° RD
14
ItAc
�
W
�.
&
LELAND
RD. c�
z _
I Rst � AVE.
cv
z
k i j �V .�� � p W. y ELOR IOGE AVE. +M" qp
_..eSE ti .a �,VE. BELMOD1i AVE.�
C� � a"` SKLL A
N�" V E ab w
*D ���t SKILL MM! AVE. WIRR ROSEWOOd AVE. N.
/W AY. AVE 50 ��p�
Ate•
ltah �`� iii iii iii fit•
r� FR057 e rn � � AVE. � NCH ALDROCH
fee FE NTON AVF. � � � > Z) � COURWQ�
MER SU AA�ER AVE' � AREN4
�S 6
IM LEY � RIPIPY .
C ound� PH IA � � v; g � A Loke
\� w
� �. A
LOCATION MAP
4
4
N
Attachment 2
TOTAL 8.2Q e�c.. •� c �
19 (s)
VACATED a! 25 -51 Doc
• 20 W
•
•- J
co
� n
COVEp kJ •
.� V C T E C
2 0
9 -e5 • 5 Owc 1 t 40103•43 .,, �0L11-
...�..
u" 5 n.
-IL
�
INC.
TOTAL
>
1
uw .3
>
�- U=HAUL
o, t
SELF
9
STORAGE
J
Q '
5 7 oc
C�-'
a .
f.
(1. 30 orc
Q
20
N
(5)
LOD
iff
R
o ►
4.
Now
a c . to V • Ilo 4 e L? . `'1 3
. I � 35
PROPOSED BUILDIN
tGo
. r
ac�
r
.�.o /f0
05 (1.r4oc�`
20
1
APT TOWER F—
G u i
Cn
01
I V ID : F4
wr
_ n!
F—
'J
0 1�
P f
o ,
�w
L
•1
• f
h -� f
1 75 .db _ Acetao tea0L
EXISTING
- HIGHWAY 36
din METCALF MAYFLOWER
N BUILDING
-4 0 171 18
t_416 Amee is
0. E roMmik of%^
� - � � "� '• x.44 arC -
._
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
5
4
N
Attachment 3
i
w.. 74 1 ..�.
M 'wulmw w Mw - � ---- - - -
MAYFLOWER BUILDING
SITE PLAN
a
moor
1 �
, ,fit• .. i�
r .' e
lop
,
r IC
di
3
.. a
8 ILLBOARD LOCATION
4 N
EXISTING
PROPOSED BILLBOARD LOCATION
Attachment 4
3225 Spring Street Northeast
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612/869 -1900 phone
612 / 869 -7082 fax
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Attention: Building and Zoning
To whom it may concern:
Universal Outdoor, Inc. currently has a billboard on the Metcalf Moving & Storage property at 1255 E.
Highway 36 in Maplewood. A few months ago, we had gotten a call from Al Metcalf Jr. saying that he
was planning to expand his building on the above referenced property.
Since we were a long term tenant with a long term lease, he was willing to work with us to relocate the
existing sign from the east end of his property to the west end of the property. I have been told that our
relocating on the same parcel still needs to have a conditional use permit approved because it would be in a
different location on the property. I have also been told that the expansion plans that Metcalf Moving &
Storage have been put on hold until the sign issue gets resolved.
I believe that we meet the City's requirements for a conditional use permit for the following reasons:
1. The sign shall conform with a applicable building codes with regard to wind loads, height, square
footage, illumination, front yard setbacks, side and rear yard setbacks, distance from other signs,
distance from residential zones and dwellings, distance from interchanges and distances from
parks. We are, however, asking for relief to be closer to a commercial building than is allowed by
code (150 feet). The building we will be closer to is the Metcalf moving & Storage building
currently on site. We have tried to find another alternate site on the property, but have been
unsuccessful. We can meet all other criteria, but we cannot find a practical site on the property
other than the one applied for.
2. The approved site wouldn't change the surrounding area because the sign already exists on the
property.
3. It wouldn't depreciate property values for a couple of reasons; the sign is already on the property
and this is a commercial and industrial area. This is exactly where signs should be located.
4. The sign wouldn't have any dangerous or hazardous materials on the structure, displays,
illumination facilities, etc.
5. No vehicular traffic would be generated as a result of the sign because we aren't directing traffic
to the property.
6. The sign wouldn't require water hook up, sewer use, schools, or other public facilities so numbers
6 & 7 are not applicable.
7. Relocating the sign would maintain the existing character of the property as well as the future use
of the property.
8. The sign would have no adverse environmental effects.
I will be happy to provide you with any other information as you request. Thank you for your
consideration on this matter.
Sincerely,
Chris McC
Real Es
7
lit
1998
Lit r
L1
k t i/
Universal Outdoor, Inc. currently has a billboard on the Metcalf Moving & Storage property at 1255 E.
Highway 36 in Maplewood. A few months ago, we had gotten a call from Al Metcalf Jr. saying that he
was planning to expand his building on the above referenced property.
Since we were a long term tenant with a long term lease, he was willing to work with us to relocate the
existing sign from the east end of his property to the west end of the property. I have been told that our
relocating on the same parcel still needs to have a conditional use permit approved because it would be in a
different location on the property. I have also been told that the expansion plans that Metcalf Moving &
Storage have been put on hold until the sign issue gets resolved.
I believe that we meet the City's requirements for a conditional use permit for the following reasons:
1. The sign shall conform with a applicable building codes with regard to wind loads, height, square
footage, illumination, front yard setbacks, side and rear yard setbacks, distance from other signs,
distance from residential zones and dwellings, distance from interchanges and distances from
parks. We are, however, asking for relief to be closer to a commercial building than is allowed by
code (150 feet). The building we will be closer to is the Metcalf moving & Storage building
currently on site. We have tried to find another alternate site on the property, but have been
unsuccessful. We can meet all other criteria, but we cannot find a practical site on the property
other than the one applied for.
2. The approved site wouldn't change the surrounding area because the sign already exists on the
property.
3. It wouldn't depreciate property values for a couple of reasons; the sign is already on the property
and this is a commercial and industrial area. This is exactly where signs should be located.
4. The sign wouldn't have any dangerous or hazardous materials on the structure, displays,
illumination facilities, etc.
5. No vehicular traffic would be generated as a result of the sign because we aren't directing traffic
to the property.
6. The sign wouldn't require water hook up, sewer use, schools, or other public facilities so numbers
6 & 7 are not applicable.
7. Relocating the sign would maintain the existing character of the property as well as the future use
of the property.
8. The sign would have no adverse environmental effects.
I will be happy to provide you with any other information as you request. Thank you for your
consideration on this matter.
Sincerely,
Chris McC
Real Es
7
MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MAY 26, 1998
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Erickson called the meeting to Order at 6 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Marvin Erickson
Present
Marie Robinson
Present
Ananth Shankar
Present
Tim Johnson
Present
Matt Ledvina
Present
II1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
May 12, 1998
Boardmember Shankar moved approval of the minutes of May 12, 1998, as submitted.
Boardmember Robinson seconded. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Boardmember Johnson moved approval of the agenda as submitted.
Boardmember Shankar seconded. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Billboard Request, 1255 E. Highway 36 (Metcalf Mayflower) - Universal Outdoor, Inc.
and Alan Metcalf
Alan Metcalf, owner of Metcalf Mayflower, was present. Mr. Metcalf said that there
was 9-1/2 years left on the lease they have with the Universal Sign Company and that
Universal Sign Company has no intention of removing the sign. Mr. Metcalf said they
may not be able to go through with the building project because their bank has told
them they have to get a release from Universal Sign Company saying that they either
would remove the sign or that the sign would be moved to another location. Mr.
Metcalf said that if the sign were permitted to be moved they would guarantee that
after the 9 -1/2 year lease expired the sign would be removed and that there would be
no other sign on their property by an outdoor sign company, such as, Universal.
Community Design Review Board -2
Minutes of 05 -26 -98
Staff said they had approached Mr. Metcalf with the idea of an alternative location but
Mr. Metcalf said that the sign company would not go with that location, it would be
either as they proposed it or it stays where it is and then that conflicts with their
building proposal. Staff recommended denial of the conditional use permit. Mr.
Metcalf said the reason the sign company won't take the alternate location is because
they feel it sets it back off the highway too far for visibility.
Boardmember Robinson said that this issue came up a couple of months ago and she
wanted to know why nothing was bro up at that time. Mr. Metcalf said that, at the
time, the Universal Sign Company said that they saw no problem with it and they
would apply for the permits. Metcalf didn't get involved until they found out the
movement of the sign was not approved and that is when Universal said they were
not going to move the sign.
Boardmember Shankar asked how the existing location conflicts with the building
proposal. Mr. Metcalf said that the present location of the sign, they feel, would
detract from the appearance of their building.
Boardmember Erickson asked if the new building could be moved back a little. Mr.
Metcalf said if they moved the building back then they would cut down on the rentable
space. Staff said the sign, if it were left where it is, would be right in the middle of the
proposed parking lot.
Boardmember Ledvina moved that the Community Design Review Board deny the
conditional use permit for the relocation of the billboard on the Metcalf Mayflower
property, 1255 E. Highway 36. Denial was based on the following reasons:
1. The proposed billboard would not be located to be in conformity with the city
code of ordinances because of its substantially reduced setback from the Metcalf
Mayflower building. The applicant proposed an 11 -foot setback —the code
requires 100 feet.
2. The proposed billboard would appear to crowd the building and, therefore, give a
cluttered appearance.
3. The city previously denied a conditional use permit for a billboard that would
have had less aesthetic impact along Highway 36 than the proposed billboard.
Boardmember Johnson seconded. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
Community Design Review Board -3-
Minutes of 05 -26 -98
VI. DESIGN REVIEW
A. Side Yard Setback Variance and Design Review - First Financial Center
Tony Sampair, the applicant, was present. Mr. Sampair said that he could meet all of
the recommendations in the staff report.
Boardmember Ledvina asked if the driveway, that is blocked by the rock berm, would
be eliminated. Mr. Sampair said they would be eliminating the driveway.
Boardmember Erickson asked where the trash dumpster would be located. Staff said
it would be located in the northeast corner and would have an opaque gate on the
front of it.
Boardmember Erickson asked if there would be a problem with cars coming into the
parking lot at night and the lights shining across to the Emerald Inn. Mr. Sampair said
they don't operate at night, their business hours are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., so this
shouldn't be a problem.
Boardmember Erickson asked about signage. Mr. Sampair said that in the front of
the building there would be a pedestal sign with the name of the financial center and
names of the tenants on it. The sign facing the freeway would say Remax. The sign
on the building would say ReMax First on the side towards the freeway, lit up like the
sign at the Emerald Inn but not as large. Staff stated that signage could be handled
at staff level if there were no more than four businesses in the building. If there are
five or more businesses it would have to come before the board.
Boardmembers asked about the materials and colors of the building. Mr. Sampair
said he didn't have samples with him but he could get them and give them to staff.
Mr. Sampair said there would be no brick on the second level which was not shown
on the plans date - stamped May 13th. They have decided to go with stucco on the
second level because it would be more cost effective and it would not affect the
appeal of the structure. Boardmember Robinson asked if anything else had changed
on the plans. Mr. Sampair said there was nothing else.
Boardmember Ledvina had concerns about the screening on the east side of the site.
Staff said there was sufficient screening, in that, the dwelling on the east side was
225 feet away from the lot line and there are a lot of trees in between. Boardmember
Ledvina would like to see conifer trees planted in this area. Mr. Sampair suggested
that he could put in a three foot high berm and have the trees at the lower spots of the
berm. The board decided to leave this open and suggested the applicant do what
would be best to avoid problems down the road.
Community Design Review Board -4-
Minutes of 05 -26 -98
Boardmember Robinson moved the Community Design Review Board:
A. Adopt a resolution approving a 20 -foot side yard building setback variance and a
five -foot parking side yard setback parking lot variance for the ro osed office
p p
building project east of 2025 E. County Road D. Approval is based on the
following reasons:
1. Requiring side yard parking and building setbacks to meet code would result
in an unattractive and ill- conceived site plan because the building would be
crowded toward the west lot line.
2. The adjacent lot to the east is planned for BC (business commercial) and will
be considered for a land use plan change to BC in the near future by the city
staff.
3. Complying with the code would cause the applicant undue hardship because
of the inconsistency of the zoning and land use designation for the lot to the
east.
4. The proposed variances would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance because the house on the abutting lot is 225 feet away and is
screened by mature trees.
B. Approve the plans date- stamped May 13, 1998, for the proposed First Financial
building east of 2025 E. County Road D. Approval is based on the findings
required by the code and subject to the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit
for this project.
2. Before getting a building permit the applicant shall:
a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans for city
engineer approval.
b. Revise the site plan for staff approval by:
(1) Omitting the driveway connection to the adjacent lot.
(2) Adding one more handicap - accessible parking space for a total of
58 parking spaces.
(3) Providing a 15 -foot parking -lot setback from the north lot line.
3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Install a handicap parking sign for each handicap parking space.
Handicap spaces must comply with ADA requirements. One space
must be van accessible.
Community Design Review Board -5-
Minutes of 05 -26 -98
b. Paint any rooftop mechanical equipment to match the color of the upper
part of the building. (code requirement)
c. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure to match the building with a 100
percent opaque gate. (code requirement)
d. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas.
(code requirement)
e. Direct or shield the site lights so they do not shine in driver's eyes.
f. Provide continuous concrete curbing around all parking lots and drives.
g. Post the nine- foot -wide parking spaces for employees only. (code
requirement) Parking spaces for visitors or customers must be at least
9 Y feet wide.
h. Sod all turf areas, including the boulevard, except planting beds if a
different ground cover or mulch is to be used.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health,
safety or welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the
required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the
unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by
June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within six weeks
if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any
unfinished work.
5. Signs are not approved in this review. The applicant must submit the sign
plans to staff for approval and obtain the necessary sign permits.
6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
7. Plans shown with brick on the second story, at the applicant's request, we
are approving no brick but stucco on the second story exterior.
Boardmember Ledvina seconded. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
Community Design Review Board -6-
Minutes of 05 -26 -98
VII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
There were no visitor presentations.
VIII. BOARD PRESENTATIONS
There were no board presentations.
XI. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
A, Representative for June 22 City Council Meeting: Ms. Robinson will attend this
meeting.
B. The next Community Design Review Board meeting will be on June 9.
X. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 6:55.
p:com- dvpticdrb.min
Agenda Item tl
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Carey Addition
LOCATION: Carey Heights Drive and County Road D
DATE: June 1, 1998
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Action by Council,*,
Endorsed..-....
Modified_,_,.,,,,,
Rejected
Date
Robert Cardinal, representing the Calhoun Companies, is proposing to develop 14 lots for
single- family homes and 12 small -lot (R-1 ) parcels or single dwellings. The
. S l f9 Y call this
development the Carey Addition. It would be on a 9 -acre site south of County Road D, alon g the
currently private, unimproved Carey Heights Drive. Refer to the maps on pages 18 -17. This
proposal is a revision of a preliminary plat that the city approved for this area in 1997.
Requests
To build this project, Mr. Cardinal and the Careys, the property owners, are requesting that the
city approve changes to the:
1. Comprehensive plan from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1 S (single dwellings) for the north part
of the site. (See the existing and proposed land use maps on pages 15 and 16.)
2. Zoning map from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1 S (small lot single dwellings) for the north part
of the site. Refer to the property line /zoning map on page 14.
3. Approved preliminary plat. The proposed plan now has 14 single dwelling and 12 small lot
single family lots for a total of 26 single family lots. (See the maps on pages 17 - 19.)
BACKGROUND
On July 14, 1997, the city council made several approvals for the 18 -lot Carey Addition. This
included approving the preliminary plat, a lot area variance for a 9,575 square-foot lot a nd a
. q
zoning map change to R -1 (single dwellings). (See the approved preliminary plat on page 18.
On May 21, 1998, the council considered a comprehensive plan change, a zoning a change
g p e 9
and revisions to the approved Carey Addition. These changes were to have 14 s single dwellings
9
on the south part of the site and 16 double dwelling units on the north part of the site. The
applicant asked the city to change the comprehensive Ian and the zoning ma p g p and for a
revised preliminary plat to allow for the proposed double dwellings. After much discussion, the
council tabled action on the proposals to give the developer a chance to consider other
alternatives for the north part of the site.
DISCUSSION
Land Use Plan and Zoning Map Changes
To build the proposed plat, Mr. Cardinal wants the city to change the land use plan and zoning
map for the area between the power lines and County Road D. These changes would be from
R -1 (single dwelling residential) to R -1 S (small lot single dwellings). (See the existing land use
plan map on page 15 and the proposed land use plan map on page 16.) The city intends R -1 S
areas for small lot (7,500 square -foot) single dwellings. For R -1 areas, the city intends to have
primarily single dwellings on 10,000 square -foot lots.
Land use plan changes do not require specific findings for approval. Any change, however,
should be consistent with the city's land use goals and policies. There are several goals in the
Comprehensive Plan that apply to this request. They include:
• Provide for orderly development.
• Minimize conflicts between land uses.
• Provide a wide variety of housing types.
• Whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar uses front on
the same street or at borders of areas separated by major man - made or natural barriers.
• Include a variety of housing types for all residents ... including apartments, town houses,
manufactured homes, single - family housing, public- assisted housing and low- and moderate -
income housing, and rental and owner- occupied housing.
• Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative
economic, social or. physical impact on adjoining developments.
• The City coordinates land use changes with the character of each neighborhood.
• Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by
adequate buffering and separation.
An advantage of this proposal is that the change between the residential land uses would occur
on either side of the power lines. That is, the small lot single dwellings would be to the north and
the larger single dwelling lots would be to the south near the existing single dwellings.
Preliminary Plat
Density and Lot Size
The proposed preliminary plat would dedicate Carey Heights Drive as a public right -of -way and
would replat several existing properties. On the west side of the street, there is an existing lot
that is nonconforming because of its size. The lot between 1176 County Road D and 2999
Carey Heights Drive is 9,575 square feet. The proposed plat keeps this nonconforming lot in the
plat since the council approved a variance for it in 1997.
This proposal is different from the approved 1997 plat in several ways. It includes property on
the west side of Carey Heights Drive north of the power lines as six small -lot home lots. This
plan also shows all the property on the east side of Carey Heights Drive north of the power lines
as six small -lot home lots.
2
Several neighbors thought that there were too many lots in this plat and that they were too small.
As proposed, the lot sizes range from 9,575 square feet to 21,739 square feet with an average
g
lot size of 13,225 square feet. The existing house lots on the end of Carey Heights Drive and
Frank Street range in size from 10,000 to 11,600 square feet. The city code requires at least
10,000 square feet above a drainage easement and 75 feet of width for new standard size
single dwelling lots. For R -1 S lots, the city requires at least 60 feet of frontage and at least 7,500
square feet of area. All the proposed new lots meet or exceed city standards. Maplewood cannot
reduce the number of lots if the developer is meeting the city's ordinances.
Through Street versus cul -de -sacs
Some neighbors south of this proposal do not want Carey Heights Drive to go through to County
Road D. They have concerns about increased traffic and safety in their neighborhood if Carey
Heights Drive connects to County Road D. The neighbors would prefer to see Carey Heights
Drive end in a permanent cul -de -sac. However, Maplewood has always intended Carey Heights
Drive to continue north past the existing houses toward County Road D. There is no permanent
public right -of -way for the existing temporary cul -de -sac on Carey Heights Drive. In fact, the city
had the developer of Kohiman Lake Overlook put in a temporary cul -de -sac in front of 2999
Carey Heights Drive so a later developer could extend the street. Public safety officials. prefer to
have a through street rather than having more cul -de -sac streets. There is less confusion and
time lost when finding an address on a through street than on two or more cul -de -sacs. Having
Carey Heights Drive connect to County Road D also will provide another entrance and exit into
the Kohiman Lake Overlook neighborhood.
At the May 27, 1997, council meeting, the council directed staff to investigate several matters
about the proposed 1997 plat. Specifically, the city engineer investigated the possibility of
adding traffic calming features and signage with the plat. He also investigated the possibility of
adding stop signs at the intersection of Carey Heights Drive and Frank Street. The proposed plat
(dated- stamped April 13, 1998) shows a traffic island for calming purposes under the power
lines near the crest of the hill.
A concern of staff with making Carey Heights Drive a permanent cul -de -sac with the proposed
development is the probable length of a dead end street. Carey Heights Drive now ends about
620 feet from Frank Street. To have Carey Heights Drive end in a permanent cul -de -sac in the
development would probably create a cul -de -sac 1,250 feet long. The city subdivision code sets
the maximum cul -de -sac length at 1,000 feet, unless no other reasonable alternative is possible.
Here,. there is a reasonable alternative - connecting the street to County Road D.
Walter Street provides a wider, gentler and more direct access between Beam Avenue and
County Road D than would Carey Heights Drive and Frank Street. In addition, many drivers will
continue to use Highway 61 for access to the south. As such, most of the people using Carey
Heights Drive should be the residents of the area.
Trail
The developer's plans show walking paths near the center of the plat. These run east/west from
Carey Heights Drive to the properties on either side of the site, including the city park land on the
west side of the site. As proposed, the trails would be in 38- foot -wide easements within the lots.
This change prevents the creation of small outlets that could become a tax liability for the city.
3
For off- street paths, Maplewood requires 8- foot -wide bituminous paths centered in easements
that are at least 30 feet wider than the trail. As such, the easement for the trail for this site needs
to be at least 38 feet wide to meet this code requirement. The developer should build a fence on
both sides of the trail within this plat. The city should require the developer to install the trails and
fences with the street and before final plat approval. This is to ensure that the lot buyers know
that the trail is there.
Public Utilities
The proposed plans show sanitary sewer and water extending from the end of Carey Heights
Drive over the hill to County Road D. In addition, the developer would extend these utilities from
Carey Heights Drive to the west on the south side of County Road D. The new utilities would
connect to the existing utilities at the east end of the Canada Woods development. This would
their completethe looping of these utilities in this part of Maplewood. The city has a policy about
neighboring property owners hooking up to public utilities that a private developer has installed
near their property. If such a property owner wants to hook up to the new utilities that the
developer has installed,, the owner would pay the city a cash connection charge. Maplewood
bases this charge on the frontage of the lot in question. If the property owner makes this utility
connection within five years, the city would refund the cash connection fee back to the developer
as outlined in the development agreement.
Corner Lots
The proposed plat creates two corner lots fronting on County Road D and Carey Heights Drive.
Staff is recommending a condition to ensure the driveways for these lots exit onto Carey Heights
Drive and not County Road D.
Trees
The main tree grouping on this property is on the northeast corner of the site. These are a mix of
poplars and Oaks. There also are a few large trees scattered around the rest of the site.
Maplewood's tree ordinance does not apply to trees less than eight inches in diameter or box
elder, Cottonwoods or poplar trees. The developer would grade much of the site and thus remove
many trees on the site. Before grading the site, the city should require the developer to submit a
tree plan to staff for approval. Maplewood's tree ordinance requires there be at least ten trees per
gross acre on the site after grading if there were at least ten large trees per acre on the site before
Construction.
Dedications
Dan Solar,. the Ramsey County traffic engineer, said that the applicant should dedicate ten
additional feet of right -of -way along County Road D. This is because the Ramsey County right -of-
way, plan requires a total right -of -way width of 86 feet (43 feet on each side) for County. Road D.
COMMISSION ACTION
On May 4, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the city council not approve the
proposed land use and zoning map changes. These were for the proposed double dwelling area
north of the power lines.
4
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Approve the resolution on page 20. This resolution changes the land use plan for the north
one -half of the Carey Addition, along Carey Heights Drive, south of County Road D. This
change is from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1 S (single dwellings). The city is making this
change because:
1. It would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan.
2. This area would serve as a transition area between the single dwellings to the south and
County Road D to the north.
3. It would be consistent with the proposed zoning and land uses.
B. Approve the resolution on page 21. This resolution changes the zoning map for the north
one -half of the Carey Addition, along Carey Heights Drive, south of County Road D. This
change is from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1 S (small lot single dwellings). The reasons for
this change are those in the city code and because the owner plans to develop this part of
the properly for small lot single dwellings.
C. Approve the Carey Addition preliminary plat (received by the city on May _, 1998). This
approval supersedes the plat approved by the city council for this area on July 14, 1997.
The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat:
1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and
meet all city requirements.
V Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Have NSP install street lights in two locations - at the intersection of Carey Heights
Drive and County Road D and where the proposed trail and Carey Heights Drive
intersect.
d. Pay the city for the cost of traffic - control, street identification and no parking signs.
e. Provide all required and necessary easements.
f. Demolish or remove the existing house and garage at 1170 County Road D, and all
other buildings, scrap metal, debris and junk from the site.
g. Cap and seal all wells on site that the owners are not using; remove septic systems or
drainfields, subject to the environmental health official's approval. Within one year of
the contractor installing the sanitary sewer, the owners of the existing houses on Carey
Heights Drive shall connect their houses to the sanitary sewer.
h. Complete all the curb and gutter on Carey Heights Drive on the south side of the site,
repair the temporary cul -de -sac and restore and sod the boulevards.
5
Construct eight- foot -wide paved walkways and fencing across Lot 8, Block 1 and
Lot.8, Block 2 and across Lot 8, Block 4 and Lot 6, Block 3 as shown on the plat date -
stamped April 13, 1998. These trails shall be between the street and the property lines
on the east and west sides of the site. The developer also shall provide a fence on
both sides of the trails and shall install posts at the end of the trails to prevent cars or
trucks from using the trail. The developer shall build the trails and any required fencing
with the street. The city engineer must approve these plans. Maplewood is requiring
the developer to pay for the trails within the plat since the trail will provide access to
the new city park to the residents of the new plat.
2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail and street plans. The
plans shall meet the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code.
b. The grading plan shall:
(1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each
home site.
(2) Include contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
(3) Show housing pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can
save large trees.
(4) Show the proposed street grades as allowed by the city engineer.
(5) Show all proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 on the proposed construction
plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and
management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1.
(6) Show all retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls more than 4 feet tall
require a building permit from the city.
C.* The tree plan shall:
(1) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading . or final plat approval.
(2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan
shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
(3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous
trees shall be at least two and one half (2' /x) inches in diameter and shall be a
mix of red and white oaks and sugar maples. The coniferous trees shall be at
least eight (8) feet tall and shall be a mix of Austrian pine and other species.
(4) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
Lei
d. The street and utility plans shall. show:
(1) Paved walkways and fencing across Lot 8, Block 1 and Lot 8, Block 2 and
across Lot 6, Block 3 and Lot 8, .Block 4. These trails shall be between the
street and the property lines on the east and west sides of the site. The parks
and recreation director shall approve their design.
(2) The streets shall be a 9 -ton design with a maximum street grade of eight
percent and the maximum street grade within 75 feet of the south edge of
County Road D at two percent.
3. Change the plat as follows:
a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer.
b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These
easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five
feet wide along the side property lines.
c. Show the existing pipeline and the NSP and pipeline easements on the final plat.
d. If necessary, increase the lot widths for the lots next to the pipeline to ensure that
the house pads will be at least 100 feet away from the pipeline. (code requirement)
4. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including any off -site
drainage and utility easements.
5. The applicant or developer shall provide a certificate of survey of the area between the
houses at 1174 and 1176 Carey Heights Drive to verify the location of the swimming
pool. If necessary, the applicant or developer shall move the proposed property line
between Lots 2 and 3, Block 3 to ensure that the pool is completely on the lot with the
house at 1174 Carey Heights Drive.
6. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site
drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading
that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval.
7. Record the following with the final plat:
a. A deed restriction prohibiting the construction of a dwelling or its attachments within
100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline. This affects Lot 8, Block 1, Lot 8,
Block 2, Lot 6, Block 3 and Lot 8, Block 4 of the proposed preliminary plat the city
received on April 13, 1998. The developer also shall notify the purchasers of the
pipeline location.
b. A deed dedicating 10 feet of additional right -of -way along County Road D for future
.street widening with the final plat. The applicant shall submit the language for this
dedication to the city for approval before recording.
c. A covenant or deed restriction with the final plat that prohibits the driveways on Lot
1, Block 1 and on Lot 1, Block 4 from going onto County Road D.
7
d. A covenant that requires the house on Lot 1, Block 3, to have at least a 15 -foot side
yard I setback from the south -side property line.
8. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading.
9. The owners of the properties at 1174 and 1176 County Road D shall change the
addresses of their properties to Carey Heights Drive addresses within 30 days of the
contractor installing the base bituminous course for the new public street.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community
development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or
approves the final plat.
0
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
I surveyed the owners of the 44 properties within 350 feet of this site. Of the 9 replies, 1 was for
the proposal, 7 objected and 1 had other comments.
For
1. It will improve Carey Heights Drive with public utilities and pavement. (Carey - 1174 County
Road D)
Objections
1. This plan is better with the multi- family homes near County Road D. We prefer all single
families. (Esch - 2993 Carey Heights Drive)
2. 1 would prefer single family all the way, but I do prefer this proposal over the previous one.
(Krahmer - 2999 Carey Heights Drive)
3. Traffic will be increased on Carey Heights Drive. The current Carey Heights Drive cul -de -sac
should remain and the Carey Heights extension should also be a cul -de -sac - neither should
Connect. (DeYoung - 2964 Carey Heights Drive)
4. As a long term resident in this neighborhood, I do not see why need to have multi- family
dwellings here - County Road D has an abundance of multiple family residences.I would like to
see all single family homes put in, to preserve the essence of this particular niche in
Maplewood. (Berthiaume - 2975 Frank Street)
5. I do not want the double dwellings. I feel that this would lower property values in this area.
would support the development if all were single- family dwellings. (Knudsen - 3044 Edward St)
6. I foresee the duplexes turning into rental properties with absentee owners - no upkeep. We are
totally against duplexes. This is a single- dwelling neighborhood and that should be maintained!
(Johnson - 1216 Summit Court)
7. This area is zoned for single family dwellings and should remain that way. All lots should be
single dwellings. (Jorgenson -1235 Summit Court)
Miscellaneous Comment
1. If our lot is included in this proposal, we have not sold to Calhoun Companies or given them the
OK to sell for us. What will be the cost to us if we remain independent? (Novak -Saint Paul)
9
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: gross acreage - 9 acres, net acreage - 6.72 acres
Existing land use: Three single dwellings and a private driveway
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Apartments across County Road D in Vadnais Heights
g
South. . Houses on Carey Heights Drive
West: City park land and a single dwelling
East: Mining area
PAST ACTIONS
1. June 1964: The village council approved a preliminary plat for this area.
2. 8- 13 -64: A second preliminary plat was approved by the Council. Council also ap proved a
building permit for Mr. Carey at 1174 County Road D, subject to an agreement between
himself and the village that he will not request any village maintenance on his p rivate
driveway, nor will he object to the construction of, and assessment for, a standard village
street in the future.
3. 10- 21 -66: The city issued a building permit to Richard Barrett at 1176 E. County Road D.
4. 11 -9 -66: Richard Barrett signed an agreement waiving his right to a village street or
maintenance of the private drive to his property and further agreeing to construct and
g g
maintain a private drive to his property.
5. 1.1- 10 -66: The village engineer reported to the council that the private drive did not meet
village street standards and was not constructed to approved lans. Council authorized
p a
building permit to be issued to Mr. Barrett subject to Mr. Barrett complying with the
conditions in the engineer's report.
6. 11- 17 -66: The planning com mission recommended approval of a preliminary plat for
Richard Barrett consisting of four lots on the west side of Care Heights Drive and
Y g the half
streets required by council action of 11- 10 -66.
7. 11- 17 -66: Council approved a preliminary plat for the Carey Addition. This lat comprised
only � p p
y p rt of the Carey property including right -of -way for Carey Heights Drive, Woodlynn
Avenue and Lydia Avenue.
8. 4 -4 -77: The planning commission recommended that the council table consideration of
variances requested by Mr. Novak (build on a substandard lot, without frontage to a
dedicated public street) to allow the applicant an opportunity to p ursue the matter of
dedication of the right -of -way (Carey Heights Drive) and pursuing a variance to standards of
street and utility construction.
9. 9 -1 -77: Mr. Carey petitioned the city to improve Carey Heights Drive from County Road D
southward approximately 1,500 feet.
10
10. 9- 28 -77: Council ordered a feasibility study for the improvement of Carey Heights Drive with
public street and utilities. The study showed that the project would be cost - prohibitive.
11. 1- 26 -78: Council approved a lot area variance but denied two street access variances as
requested by Mr. Richard Novak, based on the following findings:
1. The street access variances do not meet the "spirit and intent" of the ordinance.
2. A precedent would be set for similar lots in other areas of the city.
3. There may be times of the year when emergency services could not get access to the
property.
4. There is no hardship that is "unique to the individual property under consideration."
12. On April 20, 1978, city staff recommended that the council declare the Carey Heights Drive
improvement project not feasible and go no further with the project. Council tabled
consideration to allow Mr. Carey "to contact his own source in regard to providing utilities on
Carey Heights Drive."
13. On December 18, 1980, the city council approved a lot split request of Aaron Rupert to
create a 13,500 square -foot lot on the east side of the private Carey Heights Drive.
Mr. Rupert, however, never created the lot as approved by the city council.
14. On October 26, 1987, the council initiated a public improvement project for the construction
of Carey Heights Drive, between Kohlman Lake Overlook plat and County Road D.
15. On February 27, 1989, the council held a public hearing about building Carey Heights Drive
from Kohlman Lake Overlook development to County Road D. At this hearing, the council
decided that the project was advisable, expedient and necessary and ordered the city
engineer to prepare the plans for the project. However, the affected property owners did not
want to provide the necessary public street right -of -way to the city. As such, the city never
built the project.
16. On May 27, 1997, the city council considered the Carey Addition preliminary plat. The
council tabled action on the plat until June 9, 1997 so the applicant and city staff could
research four items. These included the:
1. Location of the pipeline and the proposed lot layout.
2. Need for a variance for lots that would be less than 10,000 square feet in area.
3. Possibility of adding traffic calming features and signage with the plat.
4. Possibility of adding stop signs to intersection of Carey Heights Drive and Frank Street.
17. On June 9, 1997, the council again considered the proposed plat. The council tabled action
on the plat until June 23 or July 14, 1997.
PLANNING
Existing Land Use Plan designation: R -1 (single dwellings)
Existing Zoning: R -1 (single dwellings)
Proposed Land Use and Zoning: R -1 (single dwellings) and R -1 S (small lot single dwellings)
11
Code considerations:
Section 9 -1(a) states that "No building permits will be issued for an construction within the city
Y
unless the building site is located adjacent to an existing street which is dedicated and
maintained as a city street, or unless provision for street construction has been made in full
compliance with this code and in no case until grading work, as provided in this code, has been
completed and certified to the clerk by the city engineer; except that, in isolated instances, the
council may enter an agreement with a property owner fors special handling of an unusual
p g
situation, which agreement shall be recorded so as to run with the land affected."
Public Works
1. There are no utilities in Carey Heights Drive. The existing residences have on -site well and
septic tank systems.
2. There is a steep grade in Carey Heights Drive from County Road D to the middle of the site
. tY
that may make it difficult for emergency vehicles to climb during the winter or after a hard rain.
Public Safety
Each time another residence is built on the private street, it makes it more difficult to deliver
emergency services.
Findings for Rezoning
Section 36-485 of the zoning code requires that the city council make the following findings s to
rezone property:
1 The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zonin g code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring
g g
property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property
adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or tan is adequately safeguarded.
p q Y g
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where
applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers p olice and
fire protection and schools.
p:sec 4lcareyadd. -4
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Land Use Plan (Existing)
4. Land Use Plan (Proposed)
5. Proposed Utility Plan and Preliminary Plat dated April 13, 1998
6. Approved Preliminary Plat - 1997
7. Proposed Grading Plan dated April 13, 1998
8. Land Use Plan Change Resolution (R -1 to R -1S)
9. Rezoning Resolution (R -1 to R -1 S)
10. Project Plans (separate attachment)
12
Att I
O
Lij
�J
BEAM AVE.
VADNAIS HEIGHTS ..fL_Q
Colow.- RD. X D
lot;,
4
Lu
2d.
0
LLJ "0/14
Q . .. a
1. SUMMIT CT.
2. COUNTRWEW CIR.
3. DULUTH CT.
4. LYDIA AVE.
BEAM
O
z
Y
03
174
Cy-
CONNOR C C NOR
AVE. AVE. U.
CT. tAl AVE. DEMONT A
DEM o!!.x LB�
, 0 ROOKS �-
C AVE. BROOKS
LLJ AVE.
o L , BR00yS SE) z
SEX TANT
CT. os AVE. v
12 SEXTANT AVE.
0000"
<ING DR. Keller
La ke
JRIE CT.
BURKE CT. 51)
I AV -
I . ludp4croo I -'Nol
GERVAIS
AVE.
GERVAIS
0
U GRAN
z
oc I
C1 VKING
II
A VE. z
w
DR.
��'
Kohiman
v
z
La
SHERREN AVE.
Kn
w
Markham
Pond,�
U
Lake
�
c e ad Lake
c
�
�
COPE
V
Gervis
LAJ Lake
LARK CT.
v
ARK
LARK
Co. d RD.
V)
W7 U
LAURIE RD.
KOHLMAN
AVE.
z
LELAND
RD.
-1
0
w
SAND
URST
Z Park
JUNCTION AVE.
z
U'
Z
Q
B
z ftP=od
w
.
z
w
COUNTY
ROAD
%r!L
C W
RI
A
C #r2
J R
X
(A
=i
rA
El
00 DR
DR
ILLS
PALM
w
0
z
DR
AN DR
CT.
w
La
:z
!3-;
Cy-
CONNOR C C NOR
AVE. AVE. U.
CT. tAl AVE. DEMONT A
DEM o!!.x LB�
, 0 ROOKS �-
C AVE. BROOKS
LLJ AVE.
o L , BR00yS SE) z
SEX TANT
CT. os AVE. v
12 SEXTANT AVE.
0000"
<ING DR. Keller
La ke
JRIE CT.
BURKE CT. 51)
I AV -
I . ludp4croo I -'Nol
LOC ATION MAP
13
4
GERVAIS
AVE.
GERVAIS
U GRAN
z
oc I
C1 VKING
II
A VE. z
w
DR.
f i
SHERREN AVE.
Kn
c e ad Lake
c
copr
COPE
LC AVE.
LARK CT.
ARK
LARK
Co. d RD.
V)
W7 U
LAURIE RD.
7in Stwrw 0
LAURIE
•
LELAND
RD.
-1
0
w
SAND
URST
Z Park
JUNCTION AVE.
z
U'
z
B
w
.
z
w
Co.
fl
%r!L
CL At Of %
RI
A
LOC ATION MAP
13
4
Attachment 2
VADNAIS HE IGHTS
O T --
�_
P
_ 143
0.03 250.
4
1 ,'
� �
0 2 � (4 0 3)
2(5e)
4
3(57r \
3
4 (561 `
661. ti25
-D
17Z 1_1t
3
.z9x.
1138
04
(9) G
I ry
n! \ X 05 .4bac _"LL
�59)
m qr�s> u)
O r47.74 "/loy o � too
23o i
ASP £s :; T - -- - - - - -- 04 '
''° we93 __ , - PIPELINE
a 1% 5,p. T.oh L. - - - - - o - - - - - - __-- - _ - - - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - -- - - -
- - - - - poc.i6 I
�� a - - - -- - ._ -�.
POWER LIN
X40 3
1160 ES
R ,. 1 C 9 rlr eJ
dv 3064 cv�,SITE
(4l0) v I
8 t33 ) 1- C�4) Lr,
140. Z7 X40.27
2
h =� t, i eo
�- 3054 ,
0 4
T c �2)� 12
r4 °. * 304 "' CITY PARK - 4� o t MINING AREA
6 3 4 6) V) - .� 4)
, - k'ti44.9G is , 28 .9 3 a c
r 3034 o � K' r J (30) Ir * 1 1-49) (� 0 .4pzcv
z I 7 1174 1
Q r 3026 C 4;\. 15 (50 )
O
140 w 3020
A va ,
r 3 ` t` r - u � r
4
3012 r` to C ►? 3.8' a�
40 r � to T1
0
to 17
3006 o A 1176 0 ;
N ► .. C 1413 t
3000 Z
GIp, v �w l
� 15 .29 � ".'
2 ` 1 _ .too. 02
r , P +9. ,, 119.3.8 . r; ? 13 too _
p n. 60
2 (46 >4�)� q (asj a `3�j i 2999
(,t 115.
$ 40.30 ar o % 1225 ? M 1245 W
o 114.4 e _ W , 2986
I R 2.4 Q N (34� „� �j7� CV v
LYDIA _ 1.Y 3 Ira., -
AV E . 2 2.993 - 121
c45) r H A 2994 5 C T .
�26.ab 99,09 alb a - �1as 1/ tar SUMM !T = 2978
dpp w s 4 �- 3 a "2990 , 1216 A 4 0 s�0
6 - - (52) 3 c 2 �' 2 ` r �- �> �o ' 297
(53) _ (38) 989 0
� cam) � � � t9 � .� � - ► 1246 >� ,J ; 4 , .
cs�� 9 p � /� 0 t 1236.
►, _ -� R 2984_
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
14
t
Attachment 3
County Rd. D
Little Canada
R-
N
•
■
7.
•
..jam
.�a
�1
r'
Vadnais Heigh
6 principal arterial
interchange
cc
' U !
1
••• ,O
C 1
E
cc
as 5 ■
E
J
217 �I I� I I I 1
i L
PON
1
.iii / ►�
s _
minor
collector Beam Ave.
1
! r
1
!1 J
or collector
Gervais
LAND USE MAP
(EXISTING)
15
4
N
C
1
l'
P
Kohimon
Loke
V
217 �I I� I I I 1
i L
PON
1
.iii / ►�
s _
minor
collector Beam Ave.
1
! r
1
!1 J
or collector
Gervais
LAND USE MAP
(EXISTING)
15
4
N
Attachment 4
LAND USE MAP
(PROPOSED)
16
4
N
•
•
w
•
s
;
...� X
1 1 1
■ f! f�! f/ f f �
'
J=
IIKLL
r
•
■
,�
major
collector
s
I
LAND USE MAP
(PROPOSED)
16
4
N
Attachment 5
-t COUN TY— �- ROIAD ---D 'L `'4 '�,/• •M • 1. "" R a.
Ott ••a.osm r r c r. sew x.v � 1 - —
0— .� ---- -- s— s s s s s i r.
fv-- ... —�.• • - -T�
L
I � N A , N f �
V
• ••- , • --ima 4—%, `�►
5c
•$ i �,
I I wl two IF
cc
PI
--------- - - - - -- ------------ - - - --� - -- --
'i i �I
----------------- �_ :�• f — ���..- .».....� - - -- - - - - --
oo I
< o `I a r 1= = = ='�
r
e p L - -j
74 p
I� >� p A
A
IL R I I WO F' _ _ a =
0
w �4 • _I c 1g I_ z
1 L !
f , —
N I
0111.741 -
I
I _ r
t !l
i
I ~ ( I w ( w
T - - - - - i r
- -- 7. --
i
Q
• [f ill ,
�f
i}
It It a 0
r
I
c
N
11
A r
2 >
M 3 -4!2�
N �
PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN
AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
4
N
Attachment 6
it ii
COUNTY--.
Pr C .
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF-
CAREY ADDITION
r
0
O
------------ &-J
p
O
!Z I
0
C) ' < ;u (0 M ( CA 3
t 0 rn
o
o Jo
f
Z
0
Cr
TT
Lp
L
0i
C
30
I I W I
251f i
M.
APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT —1997
ffeel
I
-
---------- ---------
1
---------- ----------
4
OWNER & DEVELOPER ToW C-wpiU
........... . .........
9M Djww Av=w Sow&
ft6wNw MW SM31
Eh- A MWY
----------- - ------- --------- ---------------------
Ny—. Rbdwd Dom. Low* a quwA
TrAN ow *t co am"W"
SURVEYOR Cwky-TW Cftw orpowo. jr
70 l Road C
997* a
r 1
"MAQQO LAUMbl—
-!'L
LA& C*Mdk MN S5 117
LEGAL DESMIFTION The no 9 0 acre 0(the NW*,.W
7-7
Q Aft, .( U.
NWb— 00v1a Of $MOM 4• Twva-.p 29 Nan Ra
22 W- ft—w C- mwswo gmx as am* 3Sg
F- lr% — of We "a Ix Im L%ww
TOTAL ACREAGE •47Acm Net
TOTAL NUMBER Of L I$ LAKb (R9N&F4W)
-------------------------------
-
TON)(�RAPHY MWC6 lVlf MARKHMO(K.-
R4
OATZ M&ARED
------------------------------
cr, A-,
FoWwwy 23. Ift? DATE REVISED.
4, 1777
16,ift?
C)
L J_
O
!Z I
0
C) ' < ;u (0 M ( CA 3
t 0 rn
o
o Jo
f
Z
0
Cr
TT
Lp
L
0i
C
30
I I W I
251f i
M.
APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT —1997
ffeel
I
-
---------- ---------
1
---------- ----------
4
Attachment
3 9 3
1 r
t It
t
� J t
a
C
H
:n
a
3
A
at
g � D
: o Kjo p
FA m � n
♦ V rn
IE 2 a z
a s 4
w 4
�1 5f9
PROPOSED GRADING PLAN
19
T
M UM( w( +/• MC a. T nk • 12•
COUNTY- ROApD, - -
• _ W, \
' A l l
i
,1
' 1
00 — 7 � w 1 J
8''. \ \
al
�L t
i i aI � -f•- O; m
•
� 74 + Z
/>
z
r 71
4
�s
.• ' ! f I
_� f
C
0
Irk,
11
77• ,� � t l i
�J f
P 8• s• ti o •
M N M M N N
N
4
N
^t 8
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS Robert Cardinal of the Calhoun Companies proposed a change to the city's land
use plan from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1 S (single dwellings - small lot).
WHEREAS, this change applies to Lots 1 -8, Block 1. and Lots 1 -8, Block 4 of the proposed
Carey Addition along Carey Heights Drive, south of County Road D.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On May 4, 1998, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a
hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners.
The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present
written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council not approve
the plan amendment.
2. On May 21, 1998, the city council discussed the proposed land use plan change. They
Considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
3. On June 8, 1998, the Council again considered this proposal. They considered the reports and
recommendations of the city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
change for the following reasons:
1. It would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan.
2. This area would serve as a transition area between the single dwellings to the south and
County Road D to the north.
3. It would be consistent with the proposed zoning and land uses.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1998.
20
Attachment 9
RESOLUTION: ZONING MAP CHANGE
WHEREAS, Robert Cardinal of the Calhoun Companies proposed a change to the zoning map
from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -1S (small lot single dwellings).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property south of County Road D along Carey Heights
Drive.
WHEREAS, the legal description is:
The proposed Lots 1 -8, Block 1 and Lots 1 -8, Block 4 of the proposed Carey Addition along
Carey Heights Drive, south of County Road D in Section 4, Township 9 North, Range 22 West
p g ,
Ramsey County Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this Change is as follows:
1. On May 4, 1998, the planning Commission recommended that the city council not approve this
change.
2. On May 21, 1998, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council ave
everyone at the hearing n g
ry g a opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and plannin g commission.
3. On June 8, 1998, the city council again considered this request. The council again considered
reports and recommendations from city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed Change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring
g g
property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent
to the area included in the proposed Change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
uarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and Conveniences of the community,
where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon -the logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers police
and fire protection and schools. '
p
5. The owner plans to develop this part of the property for small lot single dwellings.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1998.
21
AGENDA NO. kl
Fiction by Counci a
Endorses ,
Modifier
AGENDA REPORT Rejected
Date
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director R)�u
RE: FUNDING FOR NORTHEAST SUBURBAN TRANSIT COMMISSION
DATE: May 26, 1998
The attached letter indicates that the City of Maplewood's 1998 share for the
Northeast Suburban Transit Commission is $42,332.90. This is significantly more
than the $20,820 included in our 1998 Budget for NEST.
If the City Council is in favor of funding this request, a budget transfer of $21,510
should be approved from the General Fund contingency account. The. current
balance in this account is $93,360.
CA0FFICEIWPWINIAGNINESTBUD.WPD
NORTHEAST SUBURBAN TRANSIT COMMISSION
2561 Crestline Drive — White Bear Lake, MN 55110
May 15, 1998
Mr. Michael McGuire, City Manager
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr McGuire,
I ) ECEIV
This is not an easy letter to write. For many years, NEST has been able to reduce the amount of annual
funding from each of the three sponsoring cities, or at least maintain the prior year's contribution. In those
years, NEST enjoyed a contractual hourly rate with the service provider that was unrealistically low.
NEST also benefited from state funding of 60% on the total budget. The remaining 40 %, referred to as
"local share," included farebox revenue. The NEST Commission estimated the farebox revenue based on
ridership statistics, and calculated the remainder as the cities' contribution. The cities' contribution was
paid proportionate to the population of the three cities served. For 10 years, the combination of an
extremely low hourly service rate, 60% state funding on the overall budget, and an average ridership of 5.1
her hour for farebox revenue, was a winning combination for NEST and for the cities of Maplewood, North
St Paul and Oakdale, served by NEST.
There have been changes in all three factors. The NEST Commission put NEST service out for bid last
year when all contract extensions had expired. In the bid process, it was apparent that NEST's previous
hourly service rate was unrealistically low. After negotiation, the hourly service rate event from
$27.51/hour in 1997 to $38.96/hour in 1998. The increased hourly rate includes two new lift- equipped
buses that comply with ADA (American Disabilities Act) regulations. Wages and benefits for drivers were
also necessarily increased. At the same time, the state funding agency (Metropolitan Council) changed its
funding from the 60/40 state /local split to performance based funding. The performance -based funding,
based on NEST's ridership per hour two years ago, reduced NEST's state funding to 48% of the overall
budget. It should be noted that NEST's ridership performance is extremely good, and if had not been, the
state funding would have dropped to an even lower percentage than 48 %. And while the NEST
Commission was trying to deal with the two factors of a 3 8% increase in the hourly service rate and a 12%
reduction from the 60% state funding it was expecting, the ridership per hour began to slide, thereby
affecting farebox revenue in the local share. The NEST Commission has effectively stopped the ridership
drop at this time and is slowly rebuilding its ridership base, but a slight increase in farebox revenue will not
significantly offset the cities' portion of the local share this year.
This is a case of everything going wrong that could go wrong in the three factors that financially support
NEST. It is frustrating to have built an excellent dial -a -ride system that successfully serves three large
suburban cities, to have a system that is used as the benchmark for other dial -a -ride systems in the metro
area, and to have a system that consistently places in the top two dial -a -ride systems in the metro area for
cost effectiveness, and yet be faced with financial difficulties as NEST begins its second decade of service
to the community. We have not been in this position before and it is uncomfortable.
As you will see from the enclosed budget for 1998, the cities' share has necessarily been increased.
Maplewood's share has been calculated at $42,332.90. Please issue a check in the amount of $42,332.90
to NEST and send it to c/o Judy Hutchinson, 2561 Crestline Drive, White Bear Lake, MN 55110. If you
have questions, we invite you to call our coordinator, Judy Hutchinson 770 -2447, or our treasurer, Ted
Bearth 738 -2425. The NEST Commission meets the first Thursday of every month at 7:30am, North St
Paul Community Center. You are welcome to attend any Commission meeting.
We would like to take_ this opportunity to thank you for your support these past 10 years. We look forward
to working with you in the years ahead. Demographics show that the need for public transportation in the
suburban cities will grow astronomically, and we are fortunate to have in place a dial -a -ride system that has
been, and will continue to be, successful and cost - effective.
We are in the position of hearing directly from our passengers that NEST is essential in their lives. Marcy
are students at Century College who are working toward establishing a career. Many are senior citizens
who are able to get to medical and dental facilities because of NEST. Many are handicapped and elderly
patients at the Salvation Army Adult Day Care Center who have no other way to get to /from the Center.
And many are single working parents who cannot afford a car but must get to /from their place of
employment. On behalf of our passengers, we would like to thank the cities of Maplewood, North St Paul
and Oakdale for their support of NEST.
This will be a challenging year as we correct what we can change and adjust to what we can't change. You
have our promise that we will continue to do everything we can to maintain NEST's status as one of the
best dial -a -ride services in the metro area.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
NEST COMMISSION
Leon Lillie, North St Paul — Chair
Sherry Allenspach, Maplewood — Vice Chair
Ted Bearth, Oakdale — Treasurer
Bob Bruton, North St Paul
Mary Koppen, Maplewood
Mari Moen, Oakdale
Paul Buharin, Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc
Judy Hutchinson, Coordinator
CyV
NEST BUDGET FOR CY 1998
Acct Operating Expenses
1110 Management fees
1130 Marketing /promo
1140 Legal
1141 Auditing costs
1150 Office supplies
1190 Other direct admin
1100 Total administrative
1310 Purchase of service
1300 Total operating charges
1420 Public liability, non - vehicle
1421 Dividend refund
1422 Agency fee
1423 Insurance charges
Total operating expense
Revenue and funding
2001 Cash fares
2002 Tickets, tokens
2010 Total farebox revenue
Maplewood
No St Paul
Oakdale
2104 Total local share
2105 Total state share (MC)
2100 Total funding sources
47% @ 34,008 pop
18% @ 12,764 pop
35% @ 24,864 pop
Total revenues & funding
Based on:
38.96/hr for purchase of service
$1.50 fare
4.5 rides /hour
27,648 estimated rides
2 buses x 12 hrs /day x 256 days = 6,144 estimated hours
1998 Projected
11, 438.00 694 hrs @ 16.48/h r
1
500.00 5 hrs @ $100 /hr
600.00 8 hrs @ $75 /h r
900.00
300.00 175 conf & 125 milea
15,238.00
239 6,144 hrs approx
239,398.00
1,800.00
75.0
1,875.00
256,511.00
31,472.00
10,000.00 666 @ 1.50 approx
41,472.00
42, 332.90
16,212.60
31,524.50
90, 070.00
1 24, 969.00
215,039.00
256,511.00
Approved by NEST Commission 9/5/97
i
Agenda
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Michael /
FROM: Bruce K.
DATE: June 1, 1
SUBJECT: Park Amenities
INTRODUCTION
rks and Recreation
City Council Meeting
Action by Council a
Endorse
Modified.-
Rejecte
Date
The city park development fund received $682,000 in revenue in 1997. As of April 30, 1998
there is a positive fund balance of $406,000. In addition, the city is waiting to close on the
three rots at Kohlman Overlook, which will generate an additional $134,000.
The park development fund is the only funding source for all capital improvement projects for
city parks. It has become apparent that there are a number of minor projects that need to be
addressed on a regular basis for a park system as sophisticated and of the size of
Maplewood's. Staff would like to propose that the City Council allocate $50,000 for park site
amenity improvements out of the park development fund.
BACKGROUND
The park development fund is the sole funding source for park improvement projects within
the city. The money is generated through residential and commercial park dedication fees.
Staff requests that City Council allocate $50,000 for minor site improvements to be used over
a period of two years.
Proposed possible site improvements would include benches, drinking fountains, minor
playground equipment such as swings, slide additions, parking lot improvements and general
landscaping.
Specifically, the concept of having a site amenities account is not new to the city. The City
Council did allocate a similar amount of money in 1993 for site improvements which enhanced
landscaping and final site amenities.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council direct the finance director to establish a park
development fund account in the amount of $50,000 with the monies to come from the park
dedication fund for minor site amenities such as benches, playground equipment and other
amenities as approved by the parks and recreation director.
kd\padund. me
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Park Development Fund
Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Find Balance
Twelve'
Months Ended December 37, 1997
1997
Variance-
Amended Favorable
Acct. No. Budget Actual (Unfavorablg }
Miscellaneous Revenue:
3801
Interest on investments
31, 780.00
-52,119.81
20, 339.81
3803
Donations and contributions
50, 000.00
50, 000.00
0.00.
3804
Sale of property
133
2,400.00
130,600.00
C )
3851
Park availability charges - residential
100
177,660.00
77
3852
Park availability charges - commercial
0.00
400
400
Total revenue
314, 780.00
682, 339.44
367, 559.44
Expenditures:
4480
Fees for service
4490
Fees - consulting
4710
Land purchases
4720
Park development projects
4762
Land - easements
4930.
Investment management fees
4960
Engineering charges - General Fund
(1,122.10)
Total expenditures
Excess (deficit) of revenue
over expenditures
2, 700.00
888.00
1
30,000.00
26
3
75, 000.00
80, 000.00
(5
642,185.00
564, 237.16
77, 947.84
0.00
1
(1,122.10)
2,070.00
4
(2
0400
33,955.57
(33,955.57}
751,955.00 710 41
(437,175.00)
Fund balance - beginning
Fund balance - ending
724, 462.00
(28,421.67)
724,462.19
408, 753.33
(0.19)
287, 287.00 696, 040.52 408, 753.14
c: Park and Recreation Commission
Park and Recreation Director
File
Wendy Klager
AGENDA ITEM N I
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: City Engineer
SUBJECT: Storm Cleanup
DATE: June 4, 1998
Since the May 15 storm, virtually all of the maintenance employees from streets,
utilities, and parks have been busy cleaning up tree debris. We have had to rent extra
equipment to try and speed up the process. It does not appear that we will finish this
work until, at best, next week.
All of this effort towards tree cleanup has taken precedence over the usual duties of all
of the maintenance crews. For three weeks the utility division has not done any of its
usual cleaning or jetting. This is time that is completely lost and will not be able to be
made up. The street division interrupted their usual spring time work of permanently
patching frost boils and potholes. Radatz Avenue, for instance, has generated a
number of telephone calls wondering why we stopped in the middle of a large patching
project. We have other areas in town where patches were started, and gravel installed,
but no pavement has been placed because of the tree cleanup. In addition, we are in
the middle of the recycling projects with Ramsey County. Both the street and utility
crews typically play a large part in that process. To Ramsey County's credit they have
understood our predicament and worked around our lack of manpower. I have
attached a memo from Bruce Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation, indicating
the work that they have postponed or ignored because of the tree cleanup.
All of the maintenance employees have worked very hard and have done a wonderful
job. They have hauled literally hundreds of truck loads of wood chips to our yard. They
are to be congratulated because with all of the work accomplished there have been no
serious injuries.
The work is now being complicated by what we perceive as nonstorm - related materials
being disposed of on the boulevard. So much time has elapsed since the May 15 storm
that residents have decided to clean up other areas of their property with the
expectation the city will haul it away. We are, indeed, picking up anything that is on the
boulevard, but had concerns that this is adding a significant amount of work. This not
only puts a strain on the manpower required, but also on the costs for equipment and
contractors that is well beyond the budgeted resources. Hopefully the weather will be
Y g
kind to us in the near future so we can finish this cleanup project.
Storm Cleanup 2 June 4, 1998
I think it is important that the city council and staff develop a policy that balances the
need for service and the city's resources for future storm cleanup. Staff intends to
develop a policy for discussion in the near future
KGH
jc
Attachment
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ken Haider, Publi_C��s�pire
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, D* P*ks IftnI( Recred(ion
DATE: June 1, 1998
SUBJECT: Wood Chipping
The park maintenance division has provided a three - person crew, which utilizes the city street
department trucks and chipper to assist with storm damage since Wednesday, May 20. The
park maintenance division had an employee retire on Wednesday, May 27, which leaves a
crew of three full -time people and the park foreman for the remaining park maintenance tasks.
The months of April, May and June are the three busiest months for park maintenance. The
month of April is the major transition period as we get ready for spring and summer sports.
The months of May and June complete the transition and full -scale maintenance, including
turf mowing, ball field lining and regular routine repairs come into full swing.
The park maintenance crew is responsible for maintaining approximately 300 acres of mowed
turf area on a weekly basis.
Specific areas that have not been addressed or service levels have been cut back due to the
city tree chipping /storm damage program are as follows:
1. There was significant storm damage to some neighborhood parks. We have not picked up
any of the branches or chipped the park sites to date.
2. We are no longer lining or dragging all scheduled youth ball fields, due to the time
limitations of crew. We are currently just dragging ball fields and lining approximately one -
half of the fields due to time constraints.
3. We've gone to a five -day mowing cycle, as compared to a normal three or four day
mowing cycle.
4. No installation of new playground equipment has been completed to date.
5. Trash pick up is twice a week, rather than three days a week.
6. Routine maintenance on playground equipment has been nonexistent.
7. Maintenance levels on special park development projects has been reduced causing
minor problems.
a. We lost approximately 100 yards of sod due to inadequate sprinkling or irrigation of
new sod at Gladstone Park.
Wood Chipping
Page 2
June 1, 1998
b. Staking of newly planted trees at Kohiman Overlook Park has not been completed.
c. Installation of new park vision statements at park locations has not been completed.
d. Nature Center improvements have been delayed.
Should you have any questions regarding the service levels, please call me directly at 4573.
kd \pkmaint. mem
c: Mark Maruska, Park Foreman