The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1998 08-24 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 24,1998 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 98 -17 1 299 I , 3 -hitilly 1. Minutes of Council /Manager Workshop (August 3, 1998) 2. Minutes of Meeting 98 -16 (August 10,1998) �1 W I - R I 1 All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Final Plat - Highwood Estates Number 4 (Mamie and Southcrest Avenues, west of Lakewood Drive) 3. Conditional Use Permit Review - 1735 Kennard Street (Presentation Church Day Care Center) 4. Conditional Use Permit Review - 1900 Rice Street (Saint Paul Water Utility) 5. Budget Change - Community Center /Sister Rosalind Gefre Contract 6. Public Safety Award for Police Department Cable Program 7. Contingency Request - Parks and Recreation Department Building Operations for Unanticipated Repairs 8. Contingency Request - Parks and Recreation Department Building Operations - Diesel Storage Tank 9. Resolution Recognizing Justa Cardinal a ' i i �• 1. 7:00 P.M. Gervais Court Senior Housing Land Use Plan Change (LBC to RH) (4 Votes) Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Zoning Map Change (LBC to R -3) (4 Votes) Parking Reduction Authorization Design Approval 1. Joe's Crab Shack Restaurant (Beam Avenue, west of the Olive Garden restaurant) Parking Reduction Authorization Utility Easement Vacation Lot Division Design Approval Sign Plan Approval 2. Zoning Code Amendment - Residential Building Height Requirements (Second Reading) 3. Little Canada Water Charges - 2860 Arcade Street 1. 1999 Proposed Budget 2. No Parking - Highway 61, Gervais to Conner 3. 2416 Teakwood Drainage 4. Open Space Grant 1. Committee Reports 2 3. 4. N. ADMINISTRATIVE 1. PRESENTATIONS 2. 3. 0. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL /MANAGER WORKSHOP CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 5:0'0 p.m. Monday, August 3, 1995 Maplewood Room, City Hall MIMjUTE S A. CALL To ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Rossbach at 5:02 p..m. B. ROLL CALL Mayor George Rossbach Present Councilmember Sherry Allenspach Present Councilmember Dale Carlson Present Councilmember Kevin Kittridge Present Councilmember Marvin Koppen Present Othga Present City Manager Michael McGuire Community Development Director Melinda Coleman Fire Chief Joel Hewitt MIS Coordinator Steve Hurley Police Chief Don winger Captain Mike Ryan Community Services Coordinator Colleen Dirkswager ce APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Carlson moved to -amend the agenda t!2 add item J 1 Inter -gov, ernment Relations Mayor Rossbach moved to amend the agenda to add item J2 Hi wa b 1 - Used Car Sales. Councilmember Koppen moved to amend the a en a to add item J3 WBABA Parade Councilmember Kittridge moved to amend the aizenda to add items J4 Farmlly Shelter and County Pool. Mayor Rossbach move-dupproval of the agenda as amen ed. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Kittridge. P ) Ayes: All present August 3, 1998 Council/Manager Workshop Page Two D. REVIEW COMMUNLCAIMNS OPTI N AND RESEARCH City Manager McGuire provided a brief Synopsis of discussions and direction resented .at p p the July, 1998 workshop then turned the topic over to Chief Hewitt and Captain Ryan for presentation of research findings. Ryan provided information gathered from other Cities utilizing the County dispatching system. Most of these cities shared similar concerns to Maplewood but were pleased with the results. St. Paul was excited about the opportunity to provide Maplewood with a proposal for dispatching services, however, needed time to research and prepare such a proposal. Hewitt outlined his concerns with current status of dispatching response to firefighters /calls. Currently their needs and expectations are not being met and regardless of the choice for dispatching options these items would need to be addressed. The Council directed staff to continue to research the options. Specific P p items to address are 1) employees concerns, 2) cost concerns and 3) quality of service. They would like to consider a future public meeting to offer a forum for community discussion./ Research information will be s. brought back in 30 -60 days. Y E. WEB !AGE PRESENTATION MIS Coordinator Hurley presented the web Page design. Council directed staff to determine the amount of time we can afford to allocate for an individual to be responsible for monitoring and updating the web Page. Council further determined that it would not be worth the effort to design a web Page that had only static information. F. MR-0-P. OFF RECVCEING CENTER Community Development Director Coleman back ided rov round information and current p g status on the recycling center. The service has been offered to the community since 1986 and is costing the city approximately $ 13,800 annually to maintain not including clean -up time in staff hours. There is also concern about who is utilizin g the area. Individuals from Mahtomedi and Wisconsin have been benefiting from a service Maplewood residents are paying for. Staff requested direction on cost justification for a service which is benefiting the East Metro. Council would like this to be brought back at a council meeting for a vote. In addition, they would like staff to research options and provide recommendations for alternatives. G. CHARITABLE GAMBLING DISCUSSION Community Oriented Services Coordinator Dirkswager outlined previous discussions on the status and plan for future use and process for Charitable Gambling funds due to the initial intent of the program. Council directed staff to place Share -a -Home program and Dispute Resolution Center funding in the general fund. Other internal programs will be submitted for and evaluated annually during the budget process. k �t August 3, 1995 Council/Manager Workshop Page Three H. MARL 2020 DISCUSSION City Manager McGuire mentioned that there was nothing new to report on this topic. p p However, Mike Ericson, the new Assistant to the Manger would be beginning September 1 and this would be delegated to him. 1 COMMUNITY ORIENTED SERVICES UPDATE Community Services Coordinator Dirkswa er provided a brief summarized up date on .. g p p activities. County Fair summary; Hmong Funeral home update - which included a petition for "No Parking" on English street due to the concerns with increased traffic parking and pedestrian safety, and a National Night Out reminder. J. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Inter- Relat on, s Councilmember Carlson shared his concern with the reputation Maplewood was receiving by other Governmental agencies. Carlson felt that Councllmembers needed to be more sensitive to the need to maintain g ood relations with these other agencies and not get into habits of makin g � derogato comments about them. 2. Highway 61 Used Cad. Sales Mayor Rossbach shared his concern with staff that Highway 61 was turning nto a used car sales lot. The number of cars for g o sale parked along 6 1 was interfering with normal traffic and posing a hazard to other drivers. He asked if staff had begun a survey of the area to find out how businesses and residents in the area feel about this. Staff had not et begun a surv would do so. Chief y ya Winger mentioned they were issuing tickets when vehicles are parked over-night. Parade Par Councilmember Koppers requested the use of the MCC for an after parade party be hosted at the MCC. The coordination of this event was turned over to Community oriented Services Coordinator Dirkswa g er. 4. Family Shelter & County Pool Councilmember Kittridge asked for an update on the status of these two County projects. Community Development Director Coleman mentioned that the homeless shelter submission for building plans was probably y i one month away. She s expecting the application to come to soon for the pool to be reviewed by the Design and Review Board. I. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourn at 6:55 p . m. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 10, 1998 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 98 -16 0 ]►�__' A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:OO P.M. by Mayor Ross bach. ' 44110911AVRITIRUIMA George F. Rossbach, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present Kevin Kittredge, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present Mana •1 July • •• i as � - -1 -d Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - al 1 Councilmember Carlson moved to awrove the minutes of Meetin No. 98- as lDresented. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all Councilmember Carlson moved to aDDrove the Agenda as amended to Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all x20.1 N � • NONE Counci 1 member Koppen moved, seconded b Counci 1 member Carl son: ayes - al 1 to approve the Consent Agenda, Items G1 throu G9. as r ended.- 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 429280.72 Checks #7571 - #7575 Dated 7/22/98 thru 7/24/98 $ 256,629.41 Checks #38925- #39036 Dated 7/28/98 $ 253,357.05 Checks #7576 - #7587 Dated 7/27/98 thru 7/31/98 $ 291 848.60 Checks #39040 thru #39143 date 8/4/98 8 -10 -98 1 $ 844,115.78 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: $ 432.690.03 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits Dated 7/24/98 $ 48 074.83 Payroll Deduction Checks #66819 thru #66832 Dated 7/24/98 $ 480,764.86 Is I Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 2. Golden Star Apartments Loan Agreement and Assumption Agreement Charges Adopted the following resolution: AUTHORIZING CHANGES TO EXISTING PROMISSORY NOTE AND LOW- INTEREST LOAN AGREEMENTS WITH RAMSEY COUNTY WHEREAS, Golden Star Properties Limited Partnershi , a Minnesota Limited Partnership ( "Borrower ") and the City of Maplewood, a Political Su division ( "Lender ") entered into that certain Loan Agreement dated the 16th day of May, 1994 ( "Agreement "), and the Borrower has executed and delivered its Promissory Note dated May 16, 1994, in the principal amount of $328,000.00 ( "Note "), and WHEREAS, Van Vliet Real Estate Companies, a Minnesota Corporation, is the sole surviving General Partner of the Borrower, and WHEREAS, Mr. Todd Horn is proposing to buy the Golden Star Apartments at 315 -321 Larpenteur Avenue, Ramsey County, Minnesota and as such, needs to have the loan agreement and financing documents changed to show him as the new owner, and WHEREAS, both the Borrower and the Lender believe it to be in their best interests to revise the agreements and refinance as noted above. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Maplewood City Council authorize the parties to sign the assumption agreement and to amend said Agreements. 3. Conditional Use Permit Review - Champp's of Maplewood (1734 Adolphus Street) Reviewed the Conditional Use Permit for 1734 Adolphus Street and moved to review the permit again in only if a problem arises or if the owner proposes major changes to the site. 4. Conditional Use Permit Review - Quality Restoration Services (Frost Avenue) Reviewed the Conditional Use Permit for Quality Restoration Services 1734 Adolphus Street and moved to review the permit again in only if a problem arises or if the owner proposes major changes to the site. 5. Heavy Duty Truck Purchase Authorized staff to purchase a heavy -duty truck, plow, box and sander combination in the amount of $133,764. 6. English Street, Frost Project 98 -07 - Establish Budget Directed staff to begin meeting with the neighborhood and begin roject development for English Street from Frost Avenue to Highway 36, and establ a budget of $5,000. 8 -10 -98 2 7. Harvester Avenue Area Street Improvements - Project 98 -09, Establish Budget Directed staff to begin meeting with the neighborhood and begin project development for Brand Avenue, Edith Street, Evar Street, Ferndale Street, Glendon Street, Michael Land and Midvale Place and establish a budget of $5,000. 8. Resolution to Restore NEST Funding Adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TO RESTORE NEST FUNDING TO THE 60% LEVEL WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Council stands to be a major beneficiary of the $41 billion in ISTEA funds to be disbursed for transit over the next six years, and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council policies as adopted in its Transportation Policy Plan include, in part, to: Focus investments to help implement the Regional Blueprint and the Regional Growth Strategy to support the region's economic vitality and quality of life. Make the transit system more compatible with different land use patterns and socioeconomic conditions. Make investments on the basis of need, and WHEREAS, the metropolitan Council is in the process this month of creating its 1999 Transportation Funding request to the Legislature, and WHEREAS, the residents of Maplewood, North St. Paul, and Oakdale contribute substantially, through their property taxes, to metropolitan transit Can estimated 2 million) , and WHEREAS, the Cities of Maplewood, North St. Paul and Oakdale jo intly run and support Northeast Suburban Transit, whose funding was just cut from 60% to 46% (approximately $160,000 to $125,000) by Metropolitan Council, and WHEREAS, the cities of Cottage Grove, Roseville and Woodbury individually run bus services whose funding comes at 100% from the Metropolitan Council, and WHEREAS, the 1998 Legislature imposed levy limits on cities such that incremental funding, especially on a continuing basis, just cannot be found. BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the City of Ma lewood protests these apparent inconsistencies and res ectfully requests that t e Metropolitan Council restore NEST funding to the 60% 1eve . 9. Personal Service License - Kim Leslie Housekeeper Approved a Personal Service License for Ms. Housekeeper to be used at the Maplewood Community Center. H. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 7:00 P.M. (7:05 P.M.) Joe's Crab Shack (West of 1749 Beam Avenue) a. Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding building proposal of Joe's Crab Shack. 8 -10 -98 3 b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Milo Thomson presented the Planning Commission report. e. Boardmember Ananth Shankar presented the Community Design Review Board report. f. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one appeared. g. Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. Councilmember Kittrid moved to table the reauest until the Au 24th, 1998 Council meeting due to no amearance by �he amlicant. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - All 2. 7:15 P.M. (7:20 P.M.) Maplewood Eye Care Clinic (West of 1975 11th Avenue) a. Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding Right -of -Way Vacations and Design Review. b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Milo Thomson presented the Planning Commission report. e. Boardmember Ananth Shankar presented the Community Design Review Board report. f. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Hank Breems, Mulcahy, Inc. Greg Pariseau, 1975 11th Avenue Hank Breems, Second Appearance g. Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. STREET VACATION - GERMAN STREET, ELEVENTH AVENUE, DEMONT AVENUE WHEREAS, Mr. Hank Breems, of Mulcahy Inc., applied for the vacation of the following described street rights -of -way: That portion of the German Street right -of -way lying between E. Demont Avenue and Eleventh Avenue in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County. That portion of the Eleventh Avenue right -of -way described as follows: beginning on the Northerly edge of the Eleventh Avenue right -of -way at the point of intersection with the Westerly edge of the German Street right -of -way, thence Easterly 30 feet, thence Southerly 37 feet, thence Westerly 259.93 feet, thence Northerly 37 feet, thence Easterly 259.93 feet to the point of beginning in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood applied for the vacation of the following described street right -of -way: 8 -10 -98 4 That p qrtion of E. Demont Avenue lying between White Bear Avenue and German Street in Section 11, Towns nip 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County. WHEREAS, the history of these vacations is as follows: 1. On July 20, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the City Council approve this vacation. 2. On August 10, 1998, the City Council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: 1. Subject to White Bear Avenue, 12th Avenue and German Street and except the South 495 feet part of Northwest quarter of Southeast quarter of Northwest quarter of center l i n e of White Bear Avenue in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County 2. Subject to White Bear Avenue and German Street the North 150 feet of South 495 feet of part of Northwest quarter of Southeast quarter of Northwest quarter of center l i n e of s a i d Avenue in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County. 3. The Easterly 199.93 feet of the North 180 feet of the South 345 feet of that part of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 11, Township 29, range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying Easterly of White Bear Avenue, subject to an easement for drainage purposes over, across and upon the Northerly 15 feet thereof. 4. The Easterly 199.93 feet of the North 180 feet of the South 345 feet of that part of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 11, Township 29, range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying Easterly of White Bear Avenue, subject to an easement for drainage purposes over, across and upon the Northerly 15 feet thereof. 5. Except the East 199.93 feet; the North 180 feet of South 345 feet of part Easterly of White Bear Avenue of the Northwest quarter of Southeast quarter of Northwest quarter, (subject to roads and easements) in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County. E. Demont Avenue 6. Subject to White Bear Avenue, 12th Avenue and German Street and except the South 495 feet part of Northwest quarter of Southeast quarter of Northwest quarter of center l i n e of White Bear Avenue in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described vacations since it is in the public interest based on the following reasons: 1. The City Council previously approved the vacation of German Street and E. Demont Avenues. 2. These right -of -ways are not needed for the public purpose of street construction. 3. German Street is too narrow for street construction. 4. The 11th Avenue right -of -way is excessively wide. These vacations are conditioned upon the City retaining a utility easement for storm sewer over the entire width of the German Street right -of -way. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - All the building e evations and landsc�a'r)e Qlans date-- TJune 25, 1998, for an eye-care cli-ni buildina west of 1975 11th Avenue, AQQroval is hased on. the findings reQuired b�,, the code-- T he aDD1 i cant sha .DD go 8 -10 -98 5 1. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Provide the following before the City issues a building permit: a . A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the City Engineer for approval. b. A revised site and landscape plan showing: (1) The preservation of the existing tree cover in front of the adjacent parking lot. The City staff may require replacement of trees if any need to be removed. (2) At least four trees along the east lot line. c. Proof of the recording of reciprocal cross easements between the proposed site and the property to the west for ingress and egress. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Install a reflectorized stop sign at the exit onto 11th Avenue and handicap - parking signs for each handicap - parking space. b. Provide continuous concrete curbing around the parking lot and drives. c. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure in the northwest corner of the parking lot, not in the Northeast corner as pro osed, due to its encroachment in the drainage easement. The enclosure shall be compatible wit or match the building's design and colors. The trash enclosure shall have a closeable gate that extends to the ground. d. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas. e. Sod all green areas including the boulevard. Restoration of the drainage easement in back shall be subject to the City Engineer's and watershed district's approval.. 4. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The City determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The City receives cash escrow for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. c. The City receives an agreement that will allow the City to complete any unfinished work. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - All 3. 7:30 P.M. (7:42 P.M.) Zoning Code Amendment a. Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a Residential Building Height Requirement for 3016 Frank Street. b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Milo Thomason presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one appeared. 8 -10 -98 6 f. Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. C ouncilmember Carlson 1 •d 'd the following Resolution and m• '1 readi 1• The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Section 1. Section 36 -6. Definitions. Height of building: The vertical distance of a building measured from the mean arade level directly in front of the building to the midu int of a Ditched roof and the ton of a flat roof . buntlWeen a ' Height of building shall not include chimneys, spires, towers, roof -top mechanical equipment, elevator penthouses�an. or similar building projections. Section 2. Secti • •i - • • i • • • 1• - ��' 1• it i - : in an Residence District shall exceed a height of 35 feet, unless the Cit Council ar)r)roves a conditional us Dermit, b-e It kni :" = =i "� r - = " = ii is ":: " " :i i = " i • • = i � lu " S ection 36 building - • No single dwelling in an Re •. Secti district shall exceed a hei of 35 feet, unless the Cjtv Council -amroves a conditional use Section 36-84.2. Hei of Buildin No single dwellin in an R-1S district shall excee hei of 35 feet, unless the Cit Council-ap-proves a conditional use Dermit, 71 - 1 41 ce LAIII I IC; I 7 Hei ght of Buil dings . No • or • dwelling shall exceed a height o feet, unless the Cit Counci a a conditional tse nermit. I,, eieueu of - Section 36- 119(h). Height regulation. No R -3A multiple dwelling shall b p ptnppi=po=1 Ain ��, =ea �a exceed a height of 35 feet or three stories unless h its Council a� rop ves a conditional u P nprmit, 'EhiliniEllf siA3x (36 :Fee+ !From -=11nincle level Section 36- 122(h). Height regulation. No R -3B multiple dwelling shall - tcnrieu-c' 'L= exceed a height of 35 feet or three stories, unless the Ci �t.v Council aDDroves a I I conditional use Dermit. , IC . Section 36-124(l). Height re No R-3C multiDle dwelling shall exceed a t&tu-iit� or three stories, unless the Cit Council amroves a conditional use ermit. fie ik I e� iau ions r = v: =i i y : i -- = i= mii: Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - All NON E 1. Harvester /Sterling Improvements, Project 97 -16 - Assessment Objections 8 -10 -98 7 a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Public Works Director Haider presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Carlson 0%. -1 . P% . . . 1 . 1 Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - All 1. Hazelwood Street, Beam - County Road D Speed Limit Petition a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Public Works Director Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following person was heard: George Supan, 3050 Hazelwood Avenue Councilmember Carlson •d staff to contact the Commissioner of Highways to aerforri, tW 1' ces-sary investigation and /' DrouOr sueed 11 • ft- Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - All 2. Little Canada Water Charge - 2860 Arcade Street a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Public Works Director Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following person was heard: Fred Wegscheider, 2860 Arcade Street Councilmember Koppen moved to table and directed staff to research the Little Canada water charae for future consideration. Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - All 3. No Parking English, Larpenteur and Frost a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Public Works Director Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following person was heard: Edward Lundblad, 1824 English Street Councilmember Kittridge moved to direct staff to Dost no jDarkina on Eng from-Irost to Rij)lev Avenues, 8 -10 -98 8 Died for lack of a second Died for lack of a second Councilmember Carlson moved to direct staff to Dost no narking on one side of the street on English from Frost to Ripley Avenues Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Carlson Nays - Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Kittridge, Koppen Died for a lack of votes C ouncilmember •p• moved to table to a later date to review other olDtiotis. Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge, Koppen Nays - Councilmember Carlson 4. Second Quarter Financial Report on Community Center a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Finance Director Faust presented the specifics of the report. No action Richard Morgan 2416, Teakwood Drive South was present to request staff to research drainage problems on his property. 1 ' C;In V: I I -ITION h 9 tV 0 l 0 • Councilmember Carlson moved to adjourn at 9:10 P.M. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach. Ayes - All Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk 8 -10 -98 9 AGENDA NO. G -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Action by Council: Endorse Modifie Rejecte Date DATE: August 17, 1998 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE No manual checks. $435,333.75 Checks #39146 thru #39229 dated 8 -11 -98 $124,353.65 Checks #7588 thru #7599 dated 8 -1 -98 thru 8 -14 -98 $198,179.93 Checks #39233 thru #39387 dated 8 -18 -98 $757,867.33 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: $297,623.69 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 8 -7 -98 $48,725.36 Payroll Deduction check #67033 thru #67047 dated 8 -7 -98 $346,349.05 Total Payroll $1,104, 216. 8 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. rb Attachments n e V UL I E;FIFiE CITY OF MAF'L..E':WOOD F•AGL° 1 08/07/98 13:11 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER z F OR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITE�h'I ITEM CHECK � r NlJh1D[ -. R DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTI€:iN AMOUNT A 39146 08/1.1/98 MICHELLE BRENNAN REFUND CANC. -WHO'S IN FOND PRO 3.00 3.00 39147 08/11/98 SHARON BRUNO REFUND SOCCER CAMP-2 80.00 80.00 3 9148 08/11/98 THOMAS ZAPPA REFUND SOCCER CAMP-2 zo, 00 70.00 39149 08/11/98 MARGARET ADAMS REFUND SOCCER CAMP 35.00 35.00 39 1.50 08/11/98 01046: A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES PAGER: 18.91 18.91 39151 08/11/98 010575 ACE HARDWARE MAINTENANCE MATEB 202.42 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 407.74 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 331.71 941.87 39152 08/11/98 020411 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE TELEPHONE 31.09 ACCESSORIES 217.26 TELEPHONE 3 1.09 TELEPHONE: 31.09 TELEPHONE 5. 88 316.41 - 391- 06/11/98 020€330 ALIME:.D. INC. KEYBOARD TRAY 201.9~ RETURNED TRAY-CREDIT 189.00- 12.95 39154 08/11/96 020900 ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 874.50 874.50 ` 39155 08/11/98 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MATS 27.07 27.07 39156 08/11/98 031100 APPEARANCE PLUS CAR WASHES 119.80 119.80 29157 08/11/98 061906 BAUE:R BUILT WHEEL WEIGHT, VULCAN CEMENT 17.26 17.26 I 39 158 08/11/98 081250 BRAD RAGAN INC. TUBES 174.07 TUBES 189.69 36 3.76 39159 08/11/98 110093 CO2 SERVICES CHEMICALS 161.80 161.80 I 39160 08/11/98 110325 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS MOBILE RADIOS /ANTENNA MOUNT 1.645.43 1.645.43 39161 08/11/98 110470 CARLE, JEANETTE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 20 MI. 5.60 5.60 91.62 08/ 11/98 1.20650 CERT I F I. ED LABORATORIES FI ALL, TUBE:: PE RMAST I C , 279. 36 CHECK MARK 177.21 i SUR •SMOOTH 423.68 880.25 39163 08/11/98 151200 COMMONWEALTH ELECT OF MI INC. REPAIR SOFTBALL FIELD LIGHTS 141.25 141.25 Ot:i 1. J. /90 0 187.400 DAFtiST ., tle-i PQQTS 30.00 30.00 39165 0€3/ 11 /98 181852 DAVIS LOCK & SAI= E C.H. FRONT DOOR - SERVICE CALL_ 74.50 1 DRAWE::F 2 90.75 D 39172 08/11/98 302'450 GIBBS FAR MUSEUM CORN HUSK DOLLS - DEMO 24.00 24.00 39173 08/11/98 310230 PVC PII: 58. 15 15a.15 08/07/98 13:11 320265 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER SQUAD CAR GRAPHIC KIT 640.37 640.37 39175 08/11/98 FOR PERIOD 08 (3,54 STERLING ST. S 1,000.00 ' 834 STERLING ST. S 84.13. k 4 C K CHECK VENDOR VENDOR TEM ITEM CHECK - 39177 08/1 1/98 340110 HEZINY RENTALS. INC RENTAL ON HAMER FOR BOBCAT 143.28 143.2a 3917a 08/11/98 350700 HIRSHFIELDIS) BRUSH ('-'Ll:. ANER 5.27 KEYS KEYS CUT 33.03 23.69 447--03 39166 08/11/98 1900711-1 DEAN JOHNSON CONST 2484 MONTANA CIR E l ' 2484 MONTANA CIR E-: 9.86 `6 39167 08111198 200500 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS TRAFFIC PAINT 63.77 63.77 39168 08/11/98 260255 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY WASH. PUMP 81.56 BRAKE DRUMS CALIPERS 206.84 288.40 39169 08/11/98 260760 FITNESS WHOLESALE JUMP ROPES. BODY BAR RACK 33.95 BODY BAR RACK 124.95 158.90 39170 08/11/98 280090 FORtST LAKE CONTRACTING INC. CONT. PM'T-F*IROJ. 96-19 '.!45.814.63 CONT. F*MT-F'RDJ. 96-19 12 233,523.90 3917 08/11/98 300500 0 & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19 SUF'F'L I ES JANITORIAL MATS 11.20 41.27 UN I FORMS CLOTHING 10.30 MATS 12.00 SUPPLIF,:,S) �,TANITORIAL 1 5, 19 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 63.01 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 76.88 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 38,71 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 10.30 MATS 12.00 I ES - JANITORIAL 15.19 39172 08/11/98 302'450 GIBBS FAR MUSEUM CORN HUSK DOLLS - DEMO 24.00 24.00 39173 08/11/98 310230 PVC PII: 58. 15 15a.15 3917A 08/11/98 320265 GRAFIX SHOPPE SQUAD CAR GRAPHIC KIT 640.37 640.37 39175 08/11/98 320280 GREATLAND HOMES CORI::'. (3,54 STERLING ST. S 1,000.00 ' 834 STERLING ST. S 84.13. l - 39177 08/1 1/98 340110 HEZINY RENTALS. INC RENTAL ON HAMER FOR BOBCAT 143.28 143.2a 3917a 08/11/98 350700 HIRSHFIELDIS) BRUSH ('-'Ll:. ANER 5.27 SATIN WOOD FINISH/BRUSHES 12.43 17.70 ' S CLE AN - -_ __'- oc) V0l.1CJiF-'.'E-2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE% 3 08/07/98 13:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOIX],HL.R/ CHE: CK CHECK VE-t,,IDC)R VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUlviL-iER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT COPIER LEASE 20 0% 1 52.50 262.46 39181 08/11/98 390311-10 INSITUFORM CENTRAL INC. INSITUPIPE .66,478.50 95.52 INSITUPIPE' 7 5. v 000. 00 141 391B2 08/11/98 410370 KATH COMPANIES CORE CREDIT 18.11- WD 40 2.22 AMBER LAMP. BRAKE ROTOR. DISC PAD 13. 86.02 RE• BAR 1/2 17.90 126.27 STARTER 73.05 08/11/98 530560 MERIT CHEVROLET CABLE 34.77 UNLEADED FUEL 5,018.28 5.172.66 39183 08/11/9e 450480 LANDMARK CUSTOM HOMES 2419 NEBRASKA, AVE 1,000.00 39192 08/1-1/98 540495 MIKE TOR KELSON HOMES 2419 NEBRASKA AVE 16.44 • 2494 MONTANA CIF: E. 1,000.00 101.23 1,101.23 :59193 08/11/98 2494 MONTANA CIR E. 10.14 2,026.58 39184 08/11/98 470775 LITTLE CANADA RECREATION ASSOC HOT DOGS 50.00 50.00 39185 08/11/98 480540 LO, CHUE 2256. ARKWRIGHT ST. N l 2051 L..ARI::'[:-'NT*EUR AVEX 598.7a 73 11,848.73 2256 ARKWRIGHT ST. N 38.63 1,038.63 39186 08/11/98 480541 LO, MAYKO 2250 ARKWRIGHT ST N 1 SALES TAX F'BL.--(.XJT OF A TE:: 2250 ARKWRIGHT ST N 38.63 1 39187 08/11/98 500525 M.P.E.L.R.A. TRAVEL & TRAINING 'r)gj.( :Ia 08/11/98 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY COOKIES-OPEN HOUSE 125.00 125.00 , 104.80 104.80 "0.00 391-96 08/11/98 630090 NADE--AU , AARON IIEAL-S-•E:-*MT TESTING' 50.00 I NCN HOLT VAC-TACHOVIE-JER 1:50.95 150. 9 5 093.97 00/11/98 660900 NORTH STAR TURF" (3D 39129 08/11/98 530500 M 117- N -0 R W) BATTERY CHARGE 95.52 25' TAPE MEASURES 10.63 WD 40 2.22 RE• BAR 1/2 17.90 126.27 39190 08/11/98 530560 MERIT CHEVROLET CABLE 34.77 34.77 39191 08/11/98 540480 MIKE'S LP GAS & R.V. SERVICE REPL. AIR COND..REP.JACK 9976 712.94 712.94 39192 08/1-1/98 540495 MIKE TOR KELSON HOMES 2286 HOYT AVEX 11000.00 22EM) HOYT AVE-'..E:-' 101.23 1,101.23 :59193 08/11/98 551500 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Nl:'!)[..S 1::'ERMIT PRO4. 97 -16 85.00 85.00 393-94 08/11/98 r 5 57050r, MOUNDS PARK ACADEMY 2051 LARPENTE*UR AVE.E 11.250.00 2051 L..ARI::'[:-'NT*EUR AVEX 598.7a 73 11,848.73 39195 08/11/98 6:0550 MUSEUM 1--'RODUC *TS CO. STAMPS 70.68 SALES TAX F'BL.--(.XJT OF A TE:: 88- 66.80 "0.00 391-96 08/11/98 630090 NADE--AU , AARON IIEAL-S-•E:-*MT TESTING' 50.00 I NCN HOLT VAC-TACHOVIE-JER 1:50.95 150. 9 5 093.97 00/11/98 660900 NORTH STAR TURF" (3D y IJt:LfL' ` • 3.14 4.40 c --- Cti00 CITY OF MAI= 'LC"WOOL) _ PAG 4 08/07/98 1: >:11 494. VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER 4:x.47 510 89.57 .1 3 1 5 FOR PERIOD 08 1457 C:FIE C;K CHECK VE7NDOR VENDOR ITEtil ITEM CHECK o NUMB :R 8 5.89 NUIPER NAME DE AMOUlgT AMOIJN'T 474 2981 181.60 203 17.06 Z919>`3 08/11/98 661175 NORTHERN AIR CORP REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT 759.:10 759.50 ��- 39199 OB/11/98 661755 NORTHERN STATES POWER 217 3.14 122 771 3.14 .2 2345 10.46 1540 3 .1.4 1975 2268 3.14 4.40 c --- Cti00 3.14 .2739 3.14 ; 20 01 F' 494. y 2001F 4:x.47 510 89.57 .1 3 1 5 41, 1457 8.98 1775 154.16 <� 1839 96.29 3.981 8 5.89 2290 10.34 - 2516 474 2981 181.60 203 17.06 f� if3 J 1! .OED 1810_ 521.17 1845 89.80 ; <f 21.01 7.48 2401 26.89 x i 95 2 51:•3.013 r 474 180.27 103 55 5 .1 2 i 1882 122 2345 10.46 3.065.44 = =! 39200 08/11/98 691150 ONE HOUR MOTO PHOTO SL I DES FIL 5.74 .,i FILM DE::V. 4.73 10.47 si 39201 08/11/98 700900 PARK SUP'P'LY INC. FLUSH METER KITS 253.75 253.75 i6 :9202 08/11/Y8 711400 PE- -SMART ASPEN FLAKES 35.59 35.59 =y 39203 - 08/11/98 722300 PUMP AND METER SERVICE, INC. THE=RMAL F'A1='ER 13.49 1 39204 08/11/98 741200 RAINBOW FOODS HOT DOG NUNS BALLOONS 12.91 12.91 -'I :39,10 5 08/11/9(3 741: ;00 REGIONS HOST' I TAI... /RAMSEY CLINIC IN CUST . BLOOD TEST 6 .62.00 35': 06 08/ 11 /913 780460 SAFk: TY KL..E :.E : :N CORP SEF%V :[ CE PAF�TS WA:iF•IE:R 263.8: 263.85 �:i`i':' 08/11/98 780600 SAW �� I'L.UD DI1 I :�i::T SNAt�I <WL�LL... CF�AC! <E =F�;:i _. 1t3. 1f�_ 18. 16 <f VQLJ(`HRE:_'2 CITY OF - PAGE 5 08/67/98 13:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER./ CHE: CK C E CK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMDL-j7%' DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Amn[-JNI* 08/11/98 800075 SEARS TOOLS FOR PiW. 70.25 70.25 39209 08/11/98 820600 SNAP-ON TOOLS ADAPTOR 34.14 34.14 ,8. 8Z50240 SOKKIA MEASURE ING SYSTEMS NAILS„ NAIL TAGE3 24.22 24,22 3921.1 08/11/98 830855 SOUTHWIND HOMES 2127 SOUTHWIND RD E 2127 SOUTH WIND kD _F_ 500.00 1 4 . .2 5 1763 BEEBE RD N 1 17.63 BEEBE RD N 36. EBE 1 1 /8.3) Et BE E D N 1783 BEEBE RD N. S6.. 58 1754 SOUTHWIND LN N. 500.00 1 12.12 17516 SOUTHWIND LANE N 500.00 1756 SOUTHWIND LANE N 12.. 12 3,611.65 39212 08/11/90 831506 SPECIALTY SALES SERVICE, INC. BOBRICK SOAP DISPENSERS 254.00 254.00 39213 h ST. CROIX LE SON CENTER H ORSEBAC K RIDINS CAMP 1 870.00 1 39214 08/11/98 843340 STILLWATER MOTOR COMPANY CHECK TRANSMISSION 89.30 89.30 39215 08/ 850320 SUBURBAN SPORTSWEAR„ INC. T-SHIRTS 26.00 T-SHIRTS 36.40 9 T-SHIRTS 20. c.;I::'(:)*T DRY RESET 5.00 7 .00 116.00 J 39216 08/11/98 850395 SUNRAY B-T-B WIX, BULBS FUSE . LAMP SEAL CLAMP 47.47 178. SUPPLIES VEHICLE 16.95 243.30 Ji 3 9,:`: 1 7 08/11/96 8t-50600 SPEEDWAY SUFT.:RAMERICA LL.0 FUEL 16.17 16.17 .1 39218 08/11/98 860080 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC BITUMINOUS MATERIALS 2 2 ` 19219 08/11/98 860650 TARGET STORES-CISA A/R POOL SUPPLY 36.30 PROGRAM SUPl--'LIES 5.30 CARE SUPPLIES 12.42 54,02 39,220 08/11/98 860690 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 164.5 MI 46.06 46.06 3Y221 0 861.676 THERMO-DYNE* INC. DEHUMIDIFIER RE':.'F'AIR 91.00 91.00 39�"122 08/11/98 671600 1 OU51 EY FORD. ] : NC : HOSE 7.19 7.19 39223 08/3.1/98 Eloorl TREADWAY GRAPHICS POLO SHIRTS. DARE SHHIRTS 72.50 NYLON CLIP BAG 109.84 182.34 9 _ VCit)l :. F:1 ::- -- CITY OF MAF'l E "WCiC)D PAGE 6 ' 08/07/98 13:11 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUC'Hl'::R/ i CHF.TIA< CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMISI : :R DATE. NlJh1I: <l :iti NA DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT i 39224 08/11/98 880800 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG. COMPUTER STANDS FOR DISP. CTR. 172.66 172 .66 392 25 08/11/98 880820 TF UGRE=EN-- CHE.ML_AWN BROADLEAF WEL'-':D CONTROL APP. 506.59 506.59 39 226 26 08/ 11 /9E3 890900 U S WE ST COMMUN I CAT IONS TE LE P JQNE 64 TF: :L..E :F'H(J1 :: :9.04 .�I TELEPHONE 60.94 ... E:: li :)FIEF :: 5 TELEPHONE TELEI= 'HONE- -" __ _ 59.46 75 _ 99- f TE::LE:FFI.10NE: 13 5 .63 TELEF'F•IONE 57.89 TELEPHONE: 57.62 TI :. I...E ::FF'H(: :: 57.62 TELEPHONE 62.02 496.41 39227 08/11 ✓98 890905 U.B. WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 55.59 TELEPHONE: 59. is TELEPHONE* 1,129.82 T1-I:. -E{= H014E:. 367.61 TELEPHONE 63.09 TELEPHONE 58.20 Tk:.LEF'HO 31.5 5 TELEPHONE 59. 33 TELEPHONE 57.62 TE'LEF'F•IOI -, IE :' 1_ _ TELEPHONE= 608.2 5 TELEPHONE 57.62 TELEPHONE 41.9.55 TELEF' H(:)NE:: 12 0.2 4 TllLEI''HONI _ 59.03 'TTA...E :FF'FIC) : :: 59.04 ` - TELEPHONE TE::L.114-10NE:. 59 . U4 59. 04 TELEPHONE - 59.04 L.E::PHONE:: T LE ::f °'F IC)hIE :: 59.04 :36.7 �i TI 'L.FI 'H(7Nh: 59.04 'T ELE I•'I 014 TE :a_E : ,Pl- j0NE :: 59.04 a; TELEPHONE 59.04 Ti : "LEPHONE:: 59.04 _.i TELEPHONE' 59.04 TF: :L..E :F'H(J1 :: :9.04 .�I TEL.El "HONE: 59.04 ... E:: li :)FIEF :: 5 TELEPHONE:' 59.04 TE::LE:FFI.10NE: 13 5 .63 L.E::PHONE:: 57.62 :36.7 �i hi .T '1::.I...I::.F'F Il.)N X6.7 'T ELE I•'I 014 . 9 .. �. xt 11 :11 ::FF'F•I011E:: 141. 84 { T :L ..EP HON E 7 i . 5(3 x'9 . 1B 0 VOUCHI E2 CITY OF MAPLEWO D PACK - 7 00/07/98 13:11. VOUCHER/CHECK REGIS TEFL FOR F'ERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ fa Ifi:C;K CHECK DATE VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NAI ITEM C H E* C K AMC, UIAT AMOUNT TELEF•HONE 58.20 TELEPHONE 5£3 - 120 TELEF-FIONE: 58.20 TEI-EF'H(-)IAI7.;. TEL, E FI-101,4-:9 .74.29 57,1)2 TELEF'HONE 106.51 TELEPHONE TELEPHON 116.,36 64 TE7 LEF'HONE 170. 52 TELEPHONE 93.85 7,435.28 39228 08/11/98 900390 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA REGISTRATION L. LUNDSTEN 240.00 REGISTRATION E. NADEAU 240.00 480.00 39229 08/11/98 901300 UF'F'ER MIDWEST SALES CO. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 422.62 422.62 TOTAL CHECKS 435,333.75 v •1 ci VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 08/14/98 12:27 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 .r - - - -- • VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK, VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT_ AMOUNT 7588 08/04/98 330680 HEALTHPARTNERS HCMA DEDUCTION PAY 3,826.20 . HEALTH- LIFE - DENTAL INS. 15 620.50 - -'- - A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 2,561.15 22,007.85 .f 7589 08/04/98 530100 MEDICA CHOICE HCMA DEDUCTION PAY - -- - 3,532.44 r HEALTH-LIFE-DENTAL. INS. 20 A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 3 27,454.00 7590 OB/04/98 551100 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE HCMA DEDUCTION FAY - - 296.10 LIFE INSURANCE PAYABLE 930.24 HEALTH -LIFE- DENTAL INS. 838. 01 _ _ A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE _ 139.51 2,203.86 7591 08/04/98 180100 D.C.A.,INC. _ AUGUST ADM FEE ! _ ` _ - 616.0 _616.00 i 7592 08/04/98 280200 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. L.T.D. INS - AUGUST PREMIUM 1,860.50 1,860.50 7593 08/05/98 751500 RIVER JUNCTION TREE SERVICE TREE CLEAN -UP STORM DAMAGE 35 35 7594 08/07/98 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES DN LIC ENSE FEES PAYABLE - _- 4 _ - 4 7595 08/07/98 200830 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN FOOD - COUNCIL MGR WORKSHOP 41.53 41.53 •' 7597 08/12/98 722200 � P.E.R.A. - - -- - - PERA DED PAY-- KOPPEN - - - -- -- - - 16.29 - - - -- - PERA CONTRIH- KOPPEN 16.29 32.58 7598 � 08/12/98 722200 -- - -- -- --- - -J - -- P.E.R.A. - PERA DEDUCTION PAYABLE -_ - '__ �-- -- - - - - -- _ -- - - 14 876.82 v PERA DEDUCTION PAYABLE 19 33,925.33 7599 08/14/98 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 153.00 153.00 39233 08/18/98 LAURA OLOSKY REFUND SHREW & MOUSE HUNT 2.00 2.00 39234 08/18/98 CHERIE MCGRAW REFUND SHREW & MOUSE HUNT 2.00 2.00 39235 08/18/98 MICHELLE BRENNAN REFUND - NATURE CTR FEES 3.00 3.00 - 39236 08/18/98 DOROTHY SLATER DUP. PMT F18804 169.38 169.38 - 39237 08/18/98 KATHLEEN RUECKER SWIM REFUND 38.00 38.00 r 39238 08/18/98 NANCY LEBRUN SWIM REFUND 38.00 38.00 'r 39239 08/18/98 AMY BARAN SWIM REFUND 38.00 38.00 39240 08/18/98 MICHELLE HILLS SWIM REFUND 60.00 60.00 39241 08/18/98 MATTHEW FITZPATRICK SWIM REFUND 55.00 55.00 1 .39242 08/18/98 MARILYN ANDERSON CPR REFUND 45.00 45.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 08./14/98 12:27 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME _ DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 39243 08/18/98 KRISTI SCHAUT SWIM REFUND 38.00 38.00 39244 08/18/98 DARLENE WEGNER SWIM REFUND 38.00 38.00 39245 08/18/98 ROBERT LEMM _. _ REFUND - MEMBERSHIP FEE _ _ _ _ 35.48 __ _ 35.48 39246 08/18/98 010463 A T & T TELEPHONE 194.04 _ A/R - PERSONAL PHONE CALLS _ __ - - 207.31 39247 08/18/98 010480 AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES WASTE REMOVAL 29.25 WASTE REMOVAL _ ._ 29.25 -- _ WASTE REMOVAL 29.25 WASTE REMOVAL 29.25 WASTE REMOVAL - - -- -- - - _ - -- -- -- 29_.25 - -- - - - -- - 146.25 39248 08/18/98 010650 ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS VOICE MAIL NATURE CTR MAY 10.60 VOICE MAIL NATURE CTR. JUNE __ _ _ 10 . 60 ---- - '- - -� VOICE MAIL NATURE CTR. JULY 10. 60 31.80 39249 08/18/98 010855 ADVANCE SPECIALTIES COMPANY_ FLOAT_ MAG TOOL _- _ `_- 107.52_ -- - CURE WHITE PIG 44.20 151.72 39250 08/18/98 020411 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR BELLEVUE _ - TELEPHONE _ _ - ^ _191.73 - TELEPHONE 64.57 TELEPHONE 28.77 285.07 39251 08/18/98 020850 ALLIED CAMERA REPAIR BINOKULAR REPAIR 45.00 45.00 39252 08/18/98 020880 ALLIED PLASTICS, INC. TUFFAK _ _ 451.13 - - 451.13 39253 08/18/98 021700 AMOCO OIL COMPANY FUEL & OIL 23.OB 23.08 39254 08/18/98 030310 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MOTOROLA SPECTRA MOBILE W /HAND 7 7 39255 08/18/98 030420 ANDERSON, EVERETT A MILEAGE REIBURSEMENT 195 MI. 54.60 54.60 39256 08/18/98 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC. ANIMAL CONTROL 7 -28 THRU 8 -3 571.60 -; ANIMAL CONTROL 8 -4 THRU B -10 1 1 39257 08/18/98 041500 ASPEN MILLS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 98.71 98.71 39258- 08/18/98 060100 BCA /TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT TRAVEL & TRAINING 160.00 160.00 39259 08/18/98 060400 BACHMAN'S CREDIT DEPT. GARDEN SUPPLIES 258.62 258.62 39260 08/18/98 061100 BANNIGAN & KELLY P.A. JULY SERVICES 6 _ JULY SERVICES 84.23 6,976.58 39261 08/18/93 061700 BATTERIES PLUS BATTERIES 8.48 8.48 39262 08/18/98 0619(-')b BAUER BUILT TURF TRAC. 18.61 18.61 iD VOUCH;E2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE_ 3 08/14/98 12:27 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08. - -- VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 39263 08/18/98 071200 BEST BUY CO. OFFICE CARE CLEANER 10.64 - - - - - -- MEMOREX . C -D ... ROM. ----- - - - - -- - _. - - -- -- -- - 85.19 _ _ _ _ - 9 5.83 39264 08/18/98 072000 BIX FRUIT CO. FRUIT CHUNKS, APPLES, STRAWBER 71.25 -- - - - -- DILL DIP MACARON I SALAD , 59.35 _ _ _ 130.60 t 39265 00/18/98 110090 CD PRODUCTS, INC. SIGNS 425.24 SIGN -MPLD MALL OFFICE -- - - _ - _ _ -- -- - - 83 -- _ -- _- 508.75 39266 08/18/98 110150 C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES CREDIT REPORT SERVICES 25.00 25.00 . 39267 08 / 18 / 98 110280 CAMAS INC. MANHOLE :BLOCK 77.32 =1 TROWEL POINT, BRUSH, TROWEL 49.15 126.47 39268 08/18/98 110290 CAMPBELL CONTRACTING 2507 BITTERSWEET LN 1 2507 BITTERSWEET LN 8.90 1 39269 08/18/98 110480 CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY ASPHALT DIAMOND BLADE 31.1.01 311.01 39270 08/18/98 110850 CATCO PRESSURE VALVE 53.08 BRAKE CHAMBERS 127.57 180.65 39271 08/18/98 120400 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. CONCRETE 276.24 _- _ 276.24 39272 08/18/98 130250 CHICILO HOMES 1490 N. MARY ST. 1 4 149 N. MARY ST. , - _ 28.2 2 _ _ _1,028 F . z .39273 08/18/98 140675 COLE INFORMATION SERVICES ST. PAUL -MPLS. DIRECTORIES 438.75 438.75 �i f 39274 08/18/98 151385 COMPUTER REPLAY POWER SUPPLY 41.54 41.54 39275 08/18/98 152553 CORPORATE 4 INS AGENCY INC. INSURANCE 2 INSURANCE - 200.00 2,200.00 39276 U8 /18 /98 170900 D & D TOWING SERVICE INC. TOW SQUAD 42.60 TOWING DRILL 74.55 a TOWING DRILL 74.55 191.70 39277 08/18/98 180100 D.C.A.,INC. DENTAL CLAIMS 4 4 'i 39278 08/18/98 180985 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO. EMS COAT 364.17 z SMOKE BLOWER 1,435.77 FIRE LINE TAPE 54.45 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 1 MITTS 33.50 2 39279 08/18/98 190250 DEFT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY,CAIS AIR TANK. INSP. - STA. 1 20.00 20.00 39280 08/18/98 200525 DICK BLICK MOLDING, PLAIN HOOKS 445.92 445.92 39281 08/18/98 23:)218' EMED COMPANY INC. REFL VNYL LETERS 88.49 88.49 iD VO.UCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 1 08/14/98 12:27 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER! - -- CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT_ 39282 08/18/98 230960 ECOPRINT BUSINESS CARDS- WINGER 39.94 BUSINESS CARDS - ROSSMAN 79.87 - -- -- - BUSINESS CARDS -BAN I CK: 79.88 - BUSINESS CARDS - SCHMITT 79.88 BUSINESS CARDS -LUKIN 39.94 319.51 39283 08/18/98 240150 ELSMORE AQUATIC RELAY CLEAR, LATERO MATS 96.56 RELAY YOUTH GOGGLE 135.32 231.88 39284 08/18/98 240375 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. BATTERIES L -1 466.72 REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE 1 REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE 585.57 REPAIR GENERATOR R -1 310.13 GENERATOR 66.25 PORT. GENERATOR 125.00 INSTALL LIGHT BAR L -1 395.00 3 39285 08/18/98 250175 ERICKSON CHEV- PONTIAC 1/2 TON PICK UP ONE TON C/C 24 24 39286 08/18/98 260648 1ST LINE BEVERAGE _ _ _ YOGURT _ _ - _ - _ 213.75 213.75 39287 08 /18/98 260650 FIRE /EMS CENTER - SFS98 STATE FIRE SCHOOL TRAINING 2 2 392.88 08/18/98 300500 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 85.50 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 76.88 & CLOTHING 56.71 _UNIFORMS UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 25.07 244..16 39289 08/18/98 310710 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL. INC. JULY 98 SERVICES _ 138.25 - 138.25 39290 08/18/98 320250 GRAF, DAVE JULY KARATE INSTRUCTOR 167.40 167.40 39291 08/18/98 320265 GRAFIX SHOPPE GRAPHIC MARKINGS E2 & E4 1 CUSTON GRAPHIC MARKINGS M7 -M3 2 3,461.44 39292 08/18/98 320266 GRAINGER FILM FOR NAT'L NIGHT OUT 158.15 FILM 52.97 211.12 39293 08/1.8/98 320520 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT POLY CUT HEADS, AUTO CUT HEADS 112.76 TRIMMER LINE 8.51 121.27 39294. 08/18/98 330401 HASTINGS BUS COMPANY RAMS. CTY FAIR SHUTTLE 1 1 39295 08/18/98 330407 HAYMAN, JANET GREW PROGRAM SUPPLIES 49.68 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 1.34 51.02 '9296 08/18/9@ x.30675 HEADWATERS OUTDOORS MARk::ETING CLEANING SOLVENT 111.81 111.81 39297 08/18/98 330678 HLTH & DRUG ED /FITNUS CHART FITNESS CHARTS 65.35 65.35 39298 08/18/98 =30725 HEALTH SERVICES OF NO. AMERICA D & A TESTING -NEW EMPL. 30.00 i t: r -! is VOUCHEE) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 t 08/14/98 12:27 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER / CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR: ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT D & A TESTING -NEW EMPL. 30.00 D & A TESTING-NEW EMPL_. _ - - 60.00 -- - - - -- - - 120 39299 08/18/98 340110 HEJNY RENTALS, INC HELIUM RENTAL DARE 76.68 76 -.68 39300 08/18/98 340601 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE TRAINING TUITION 668.50 668.50 - 39301 08/ 18 / 98 341711 HERL ,, RICK Ck -- - -_ _ _- _ - SUPER VGA M/ M .. 47.8 - --- .47.89 39302 08/18/98 350700 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT 165.43 165.43 393.03 08/18/98 350940 HOME DEPOT /GECF SAFETY GLASSES 22.27 SAFETY GLASSES 40.34 ROLLERS ROLLER PAN TRIM ROLLE _ _ 26 _ 88.68 39304 08/18/98 370076 HUGHES & COSTELLO RETAINER FEE 5 _LEGAL SERVICES 627.25 5!627.25 39305 08/18/98 380819 IOS CAPITAL COPIER LEASE 80% 241.38 COPIER LEASE 20% - -- __ -- 60.35 301.73 39306 08/18/98 400650 J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC. APPLIANCES RECYCLED 324.00 APPLIANCES RECYCLED 303.00 APPLIANCES RECYCLED _ _ _ _ 91.00 APPLIANCES RECYCLED 156.00 APPLIANCES RECYCLED 99.00 _ APPLIANCES RECYCLED _ _ _ - - 121.00 APPLIANCES RECYCLED 179.00 APPLIANCES RECYCLED 106.00 1 39307 08/18/98 410370 KATH COMPANIES CREDIT FOR CORE RETURN 18.11 - - HEATER HOSE 12.68 HEATER HOSE - - - - 24.47 - GREASE GUN, COUPLERS 92.34 DISC. PAD 23.06 134.44 39308 08/18/98 430300 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. MUFFIN MIX,ZIPLOC BAGS,CREAM,C 46.54 46.54 39309 08/18/98 430350 GECC /KNOX LUMBER CEDAR 5.89 PLYWOOD, DRIVE BIT SQUARE 372.71 BOLTS, CEDAR SPLIT RAIL 29.62 408.22 39310 08/18/98 450120 L.M.C.I.T. INSURANCE 44 44 39313 08/18/98 450485 LANDSCAE ALTERNATIVES MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 128.48 128.48 3931? 08/18/98 460000 LE L. SHER,R I E APRONS- EMPLOYEE TRAINING EVENT 36.17 MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 7.80 43.97 39313 08/18/98 460452 LEAGUE OF MINN. CITIES SEXUAL HARASSMENT TRAINING F.D 225.00 225.00 ru VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 08/14/98 12:27 VOUCHER /CHECK: REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ - -- CHECK; CHECK; VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK; NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 39314 08/18/98 500800 M.T.I. DISTRIBUTING CO. BELT, BRG. ASSEM. SEAL, COASTS 323.62 323.62 39315 08/18/98 501225 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SANDERS 119182.50 _ 119182.50 39316 08/18/98 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY ------- BAKERY 375.03 _ BIRTHDAY CAKES 123.75 BIRTHDAY CAKES 84.25 583.03 39317 08/18/98 530560 MERIT CHEVROLET SWITCH AS 8.99 - PIN, BOOT, PLATE 41008 INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES 46.75 - RESISTOR 11086 108.68 39318 08/18/98 530815 METRO FIRE INC. _ SUPPLIES - _EQUIPMENT _ _ 38 38.79 39319 08/18/98 531400 METRO SALES INC. TONER 1,05.5.05 1,055.05 39320 08/18/98 531830 MEYER ENTERPRISES ALTERNATOR 181.05 181.05 39321 08/18/98 532551 MI CROFLEX MEDICAL _ _ _ _ ___ __ GLOVES_ 39322 08/18/98 540160 MID►FMATION PREFIX BADGES NOT WORKING 90.00 90.00 39323 08/18/98 540175 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. MDSE. FOR RESALE 711.60 711.60 39324 08/18/98 540182 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES E -Z DIGGER 365.3 365. 39325 08/18/98 540770 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGER 231.02 231.02 39326 08/18/98 542140 MINNESOTA FIRE SERVICE F.F. CERTIFICATION 270.00 270.00 39327 08/18/98 542440 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL REG I STRAT I ON- PRIEM, MULVANEY, LUNDSTEN _ 75.00 _ _ 75.00 39328 08/18/98 542455 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 93.24 93.24 39329 08/18/98 542520 MINN STATE BAR ASSOCIATION ANNUAL LAW TRAINING -KARIS 195.00 ANNUAL LAW TRAINING - WELCHLIN 195.00 ANNUAL__LAW TRAINING- BERGERON 195.00 ANNUAL LAW TRAINING- SHORTREED 195.00 780.00 39330 08/18/98 570050 MOBILE EMERGENCY SYSTEMS, INC. HEADLIGHT FLASHER, POWER.OUTLE 957.00 957.00 39331 08/18/98 630910 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE EMPLOYMENT AD - SECRETARY 215.28 215.28 39132 08/18/98 640550 NELSON, JEAN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 98 MI. 27.44 27.44 - 39333 08/18/98 64108.7.0 NEXT CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES, INC SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 84.55 2 PENT II 266 MHZ COMPUTERS 3 3,933.46 3 9334 08/18/98 660180 NORTH METRO AUTOMOTIVE CHECK A/C - M4 125.16 125.16 cl? I _ ___ �, 08/14/98 12:27 I;1 _ VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 39335 08/18/98 t, JI 39336 08/18/98 39337 08/18/98 39338 08/18/98 r 39339 08/18/98 "r - - 3 9340 OB/18/98 39341 08/18/98 39342 08/18/98 r- 39343 08/18/98 j 39344 08/18/98 39345 08/18/98 740320 39346 08/18/98 741200 39347 08/18/98 39348 08/18/98 59349 08/18/98 so- VENDOR NUMBER 660900 661181 661600 661755 670950 691150 700800 700870 711690 720760 742110 742126 7505 O CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT NORTH STAR TURF, INC. RELAYS 31.31 BUSHINGS, WHEELS # SPACERS _ -__ _ . 77.06 BUSHINGS$ SHAFTS 79.24 -GRASS SEED 467.11 GRASS SEED 467.11 1 NORTHERN AIRGAS OXYGEN 268.44 CYLINDER RENTAL 34. 302.71 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS,INC. METAL REINFORCED CUTOFF BLADE 80.BB 80.88 NORTHERN STATES POWER - UTILITIES 18.51 UTILITIES 70.48 88.99 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC CITY NEWSLETTER - - 1 CITY NEWSLETTER 758.00 CITY NEWSLETTER 389.00_ - _ PRINT COPIES OF PARKS SURVEY 233.24 2 ONE HOUR MOTO PHOTO FILM PROC. 4.71 - - - -- - FILM PROC - -- - - -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- -53.25 - - - -- - - - -- - -- FILM PROC. 10.87 FILM FROC. 5.60 - -- -- - - - -- - - DEVELOP FILM - -- - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- _ -- 61 .11 DEVELOP FILM 2.62 138.16 PAPER WAREHOUSE, INC. V TICKETS, BALLOONS, TABLESKIRT - 29.61 CUPS, BALLOONS 32.91 62.52 PARAGON BUSINESS SYSTEMS MUSIC @ MCC 101.12 101.12 PIONEER PRESS SUBSCRIPTIONS -MCC 104.00 104.00 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS TONER CART. 80% 120.09 TONER CART. 20% 30.02 150.11 RDJ SPECIALITITES, INC. SUCKERS 236.24 236.24 RAINBOW FOODS BALLS, PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 40.98 FOOD FOR PIZZA THANK YOU PARTY 121.37 SUPPLIES FOR EMP.ICE CREAM SOC 40.67 203.02 REGIONS HOSPITAL DRUGS & SUPPLIES 109.53 109.53 RAMSEY COUNTY FAIR CTY. FAIR FIREWORKS 2,500.00 2 REGAL AUTO WASH #20M CAR WASHES 157.50 CAR WASHES 45.00 CAF, WASHES 7.50 CAR WASHES 44.95 254.95 VOUCHRE2 08/14/98. 12:27 r - VOUCHER / CHECK CHECK ' NUMBER DATE 39350 08/18/98 39351 08/18/98 =� 39352 08/18/98 39353 08/18/98 39354 08/18/98 39355 08/18/98 ; 39356 08/18/98 s 39357 08/1B/98 39358 08/18/98 -� 39359 08/18/98 39360 08/ 18/98 39361 08/18/98 - 39362 08/18/98 - 39363 08/18/98 DESCRIPTION _ 39364 08/18/98 'f 39365 08/18/98 385.33 39366 08/18/98 _ . 39367 08/18/98 s CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE_ - 8 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NAME _ DESCRIPTION _ _ AMOUNT AMOUNT 750550 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS MDSE. FOR.RESALE 385.33 T ORTILLAS . MAYO CHEESE SAUCE , PR _ _ _ _556.20 - 941.53 751400 RICK'S DEER & BEAVER REMOVAL DEER REMOVAL 200.00 200.00 751445 RISK MGMT ALTERNATIVES, INC. FEE- PRIMARY PROGRAM FROM JULY 51.00 51.00 761200 ROAD RESCUE t INC. _ _ - E LBOW LATCH _- _ _ _ -` _ _ 5.2 _ _ _ 5.25 761300 ROADRUNNER COURIER SERVICE 10.30 10.30 762175 ROSEVILLE RADIO - WEATHERPROOF SPEAKERS /CONNECT. 649.22 � 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC - - - -- - - - - - - -.�_ HOT F HANGER SE T - - -- - - - - -- 20 - -� -- . HOT FILE SYSTEM 58.13 _ BINDER, REFILL SHEETS, STAMP 84.42 BINDER PENS, 9.18 ENVELOPES, CLIPS, PENCILS, 154.99 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 193.50 520.71 780350 S.E.H. CONTRACT PMT. - PROJ. 97 -02 1,551.74 1 780600 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT MISC. ITEMS EMP. TRAIN. SESSIO 75.83 TOOTSIE POPS, FRUIT SNACKS H9.00 164.83 780730 SAUTER & SONS, INC. 1580 AVE . E ___- _ +__ -_ _ 6 , 37 5.00 - BEAM 1580 BEAM AVE. E 241.51 6 790105 SCHIPPITS HAL _ _ _EMPLOYEE TRAINING 1 1,500.00 800075 SEARS SPOTLIGHT 10.64 10.64 800450 SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL & ENG - HOIST REMOVAL DOCUMENTATION 798.40 798.40 831400 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC. UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 2 2,011.86 831505 SPECIALTY RADIO SERVICES REPAIR PORT. RADIO 29.11 REPAIR MOBILE RADIO 31.00 MISC. PARTS 343.46 403.57 831507 SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS,INC. REPAIRS & MTNCE. /EQUIPMENT 2 2 840205 ST. CROIX RECREATION SANDWORKS,SCRAMBLER RIDER,DIGG 6 6 840405 ST. PAUL, CITY OF FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACT SERV. 2 CONTRACT PMT. PROJ. 89 -21 1,130.54 CONTRACT PMT. PROJ. 96.02 518.00 CONTRACT PMT. PROJ. 96.02 499.88 RADIO SERV. & MAINT JULY 392.65 RADIO SERV. & MAINT JULY 68.77 RADIO SERV. & MAINT JULY 29.45 s VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 9 T 08/14/98 12:27 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 VOUCHER/ - - - -- CHECK CHECK; VENDOR VENDOR, ITEM ITEM CHECK: NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME _ DESCRIPTION AMOUNT _ AMOUNT _ RADIO SERV. & MAINT JULY 113.00 CRIME_ LAB SERVICES _ _ _._ . _ 345.00_ _- _ _ _ 5172.29 _ 39368 08/18/98 840651 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS PUBLISHING 1 1 39369 08/18/98 843655 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAX /COPIERS DEVELOPERS - TONERS 311.78 FAX /COPIERS DEVELOPERS- TONERS 311.78 FAX /COPIERS DEVELOPERS- TONERS 48.89 672.45 39370 08/18/98 850317 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 2ND HALF MEMB. ASSESSMENT 1 1 39371 08/18/98 850340 SUMMIT INSPECTION SERVICES LTD FEES FOR SERVICE 2 0 306.20 DEFERRED REVENUE ELEC.PERMIT 2 - - - - - - - - -- ELECTRIC PERMIT FEES - - - _ - --- - 21@82.75- -- - - -- -- - 2,306.20 3972 08/18/98 850395 SUNRAY B -T -B PLUS PRO. 116.63 116.63 39373 08/18/98 851575 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC. 3 PART PAPER 85.84 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 217.00 OKIDATA MICROLINE _DISKS _,_ .__. _95.02 _ _397.86 39374 08/18/98 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA A/R CAMERA FILM FOR T- WOLVES CAMP 7.98 BATTERIES TAPES _149.02 _ 157.00 39375 08/18/98 861613 THE DAFFODIL MART SORBET BULbS,PETITE, SHIRLEY 389.85 389.85 39376 08/18/98 880675 TROPHIES UNLIMITED SUMMER SOFTBALL TROPHIES 342.40 342.40 3977 08/18/98 880700 TULGREN JIM 70 W CO. RD. B 5 70 W CO. RD. B 530.41 5,530.41 39378 08/18/98 882000 TWIN CITY SAW & SERVICE CO LINE HEAD POLY HEAD .080 LIN _ 1 . 36.26 _ SWIVEL ARM 51.76 188.02 39379 08/18/98 882830 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVE TOW VEH. 53.50 53.50 39380 08/18/98 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED PANTS,WHITE SHIRTS, NAVY SHIRT 360.18 UNIFORM NAME TAGS 52.19 _ SHIRT, PANT, HAT, SHOE 210.73 SHIRTS, PANTS 133.02 SHIRT S.S. PANTS, BIKE PANT 98.46 854.58 39381 08/18/98 900173 UNITED HOSPITAL PRE- PLACEMENT SCREENINGS F.D. 56.00 56.00 39382 08/18 ✓98 911600 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS EAR PLUGS 117.68 117.68 39383 08/18/98 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P. COMM. PLBG. INSPECTIONS 92.00 - COMM.'PLBG. INSPECTIONS 115.00 COMM. PLBG. INSPECTIONS 115.00- 92.00 39384 08/18/98 9 4361 WOODMAN, ALICE WATER, NOODLES 7.99 7.99 ( o 116, VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 10 r 08/14/98 12:27 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 (; VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK }' NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 39385 08/18/98 960450 XEROX CORPORATION DUPLICATING COSTS 14.62 DUPLICATING COSTS 4.08 DUPLICATING COSTS 102.32 DUPLICATING COSTS 50.08 DUPLICATING COSTS 43.85 214.95 39386 08/1.8/98 970700 YOCUM OIL CO. 30 W MOTOR OIL 16.78 FUEL 12.61 - FUEL 11.29 - 40.68 - 3987 08/18/98 980560 ZITC0 INC. _ FLOOR DRY - 179.72 179.72 TOTAL CH ECKS 322 I� CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT.DEPOSI 08/07/98 ALLENSPACH,SHERRY 325.77 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08 0 7/ 9 8 CARLSON , THERESE 15 9 5.2 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 FAUST ,DANIEL F 3 3 0 3 .7 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 ANDERSON, CAROLE J 655944 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/58 DEHN DEBORAH 14 4 0.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 HANGS LEBEN,RICHARD 1940.52 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 CARLE,JEANETTE E 1407.51 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/01/98 JAGOE,CAROL 1326950 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 OLSON,SANDRA 1238998 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 POWELL,PHILIP 1552.31 .DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 ALDRIDGE,MARK 1850.25 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 BECKER , RONALD D 2 4 0 4.2 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 BOHL, JOHN C 2 019.75 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 FLOR, TIMOTHY 2 2 5 6.14 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 KVAM ,DAVID 218 3.0 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 STEFFEN, SCOTT L 2463.67 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 YOUNGREN,JAMES 2245.13 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 EVERSON,PAUL 1714.83 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 FRASER,JOHN 2195.88 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 ADELSON , LINDA 6 9 7.2 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 STAHNKE ,JULIE A 1420992 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 HAI DER , KENNETH G 3 2 8 0.2 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 1714.62 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 LUNDSTEN , LANCE 214 8.2 2 DMCT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 OSWALD , ERI CK D 14 6 2.9 2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DUCHARME , JOHN 15 3 2.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 PECK , DENNI S L 17 6 9.7 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 ANDERSON, BRUCE 2,815910 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 MARUSKA , MARK A 19 3 3.8 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 GREW- HAYMAN JANET M 8 9 5.0 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 COLEMAN MELINDA 2 8 81.2 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 EKSTRAND,THOMAS G 1781.72 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 ROBERTS,KENNETH 1813.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 EASTN[AN,THOMAS E 2008.09 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 TAYLOR,KATHERINE 297.66 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 HURLEY , STEPHEN 19 7 7.6 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J 19 7 6.2 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 EDGE , DOUGLAS 1431943 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 CROSSON, LINDA 1415.42 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 LIVINGSTON , JOYCE L 7 8 8.7 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 KNAUS S, PETER 7 0 3.3 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 PALMA,STEVEN 2071.58 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98. JOHNSON,KEVIN 1910.52 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 WARMAN 922.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DOHERTY , KATHLEEN M 14 2 0.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 JENSEN, MATTHEW 8 91.2 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 LE , SHERYL 2 8 4 9.95 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DOWDLE , VIRGINIA 217 4.0 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 RO S SBACH , GEORGE 3 7 0.2 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 LUT Z DAVID P 14 6 0.9 2 o/q CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07J98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRECTbEPOSIT 08/07/98 EMPLOYEE NAME .------------------------------ SCHLINGMAN,PAUL FARR,DIANE M GRAF,MICHAEL VORWERK,ROBERT E NAGEL,BRYAN GUILFOILE,KAREN E HELLE,KERRY CARVER,NICHOLAS N OSTER,ANDREA J ANDREWS,SCOTT A RUNNING,ROBERT SAVAGEAU,STEPHEN D BARTEL,DENISE CARLSON,DALE MARTINSON,CAROL F HIEBERT,STEVEN DUNN,ALICE CORNER,AMY L STEVENS,MARY CATHERINE HORSNELL,JUDITH A SEEGER,GERALD F MOREHEAD,JESSICA R STILL,VERNON T LOMBARDI,JAMES D HUTCHINSON, ANN E AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 1718.62 218.88 978.27 1.986.52 1483.92 1924.62 1853.42 1748.92 1420.92 2209.13 1397.92 1152.12 60.75 325.77 1422.32 1932.41 2188.75 109.50 36.40 641.82 288.92 154.15 18 99.3 2 1138.62 1675.42 cc;51 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 COLEMAN , PHILIP 210.41 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 BELDE , STANLEY 19 21.2 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 ATKINS KATHERINE 3 8 2.19 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 ZWIEG,SUSAN C. 1271.93 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 FRY,PATRICIA 1403.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 RENSLOW,RITA 66915 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 BAKKE , LONN A 14 5 2.6 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 BERGERON ,JOSEPH A 2 7 2 5.8 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 BOWMAN ,RICK A 1916.7 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 CAVETT ,CHRISTOPHER M 2 0 6 5.8 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 KANE ,MICHAEL R 2 0 0 5.0 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 KOPPEN , MARVIN 325977 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 CHRISTENSEN, JODIE D 660.33 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 STAPLES PAULINE 2 2 3 0.6 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 K ITTRIDGE,KEVIN L 325.77 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 PIKE,GARY K 1226.17 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 ICKES,SHERI 1010952 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN 1624.67 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 DRI S COLL , MARGARET H 1010.5 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 HEINZ , STEPHEN J 2 09 6.97 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 EVANS , JOHN G 213965 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 NELSON , JEAN 8 5 3.7 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 KELLY ,LISA 874909 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 TET Z LAFF,JUDY A 572.03 66834 08/07/98 KLAGER,WENDY 2230.59 in .CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 66837 08/07/98 MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A 3953.17 66838 08/07/98 WHITE,BARRY T 72.50 66839 08/07/98 CUDE,LARRY J 369.15 66840 08/07/98 EDSON,KAREN L 7 15.50 66841 08/07/98 HILDEBRANDT,KATIE L 72.00 66842 08/07/98 JACKSON,KIMBERLY A 709.88 66843 08/07/98 KIGIN,DAVID W 690.00 66844 08/07/98 KOHNER,JANEEN C 510.00 66845 08/07/98 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 128.00 66846 08/07/98 JACKSON,MARY L 1132912 66847 08/07/98 KELSEY,CONNIE L 726957 66848 08/07/98 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 1536.76 66849 08/07/98 NIVEN,AMY S 144.50 66850 08/07/98 CASAREZ,GINA 1228.12 66851 08/07/98 JOHNSON,BONNIE 797.82 .66852 08/07/98 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1369.03 66853 08/07/98 PALANK,MARY KAY 1314.52 66854 08/07/98 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1386.39 66855 08/07/98 RYAN,MICHAEL 2720.02 66856 08/07/98 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1447.32 66857 08/07/98 BANICK,JOHN J 2474900 66858 08/07/98 BARTZ,PAUL 1770944 66859 08/07/98 HALWEG,KEVIN R 2573.34 66860 08/07/98 HERBERT,MICHAEL J. 1942.62 66861 08/07/98 KARIS,FLINT D 2217.30 (DI I AMOUNT 117 2.9 2 2309.05 1899 32 1592.64 1934.24 1899.32 2157.51 1823.32 1977.04 1525.48 2132.74 2004.80. 1946.84 2224.48 126.50 121.00 1518.23 1680.42 1635.36 141.9.9 8 1420.92 2559.34 1473.72 684.00 1433.72 0c)3 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 66862 08/07/98 MACFARLANE R 66863 08/07/98 RABBETT,KEVIN 66864 08/07/98 RAZSKAZOFF,DALE 66865 08/07/98 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 66866 08/07/98 STAFNE,GREGORY L 66867 08/07/98 STOCKTON,DERRELL T 66868 08/07/98 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 66869 08/07/98 WATCZAK,LAURA 66870 08/07/98 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 66871 08/07/98 HALE,THOMAS M 66872 08/07/98 MEEHAN,JAMES 66873 08/07/98 MELANDER,JON A 66874 08/07/98 ROSSMAN,DAVID A 66875 08/07/98 THIENES,PAUL 66.876 08/07/98 FECHT,MICHAEL J 66877 08/07/98 GERVAIS- JR,CLARENCE N 66878 08/07/98 BOYER,SCOTT K 66879 08/07/98 FEHR,JOSEPH P 66880 08/07/98 FLAUGHER,JAYME L 66881 08/07/98 LAFFERTY,WALTER 66882 08/07/98 RABINE,JANET L 66883 08/07/98 HEWITT,JOEL A 66884 08/07/98 CHLEBECK,JUDY M .66885 08/07/98 CHRISTENSEN,DANIEL G 66886 08/07/98 DARST,JAMES AMOUNT 117 2.9 2 2309.05 1899 32 1592.64 1934.24 1899.32 2157.51 1823.32 1977.04 1525.48 2132.74 2004.80. 1946.84 2224.48 126.50 121.00 1518.23 1680.42 1635.36 141.9.9 8 1420.92 2559.34 1473.72 684.00 1433.72 0c)3 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 66887 08/07/98 FREBERG,RONALD L 66888 08/07/98 MEYER,GERALD W 66889 08/07/98 THOMAS- JR,STEVEN 66890 08/07/98 WESTERHAU8,KEVIN M 66891 08/07/98 CORWIN,ERIC B 66892 08/07/98 ELIAS,JAMES G 66893 08/07/98 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 66894 08/07/98 PRIEBE,WILLIAM 66895 08/07/98 SIMMONS,LARA R 66896 08/07/98 ANDERSON,ROBERT S 66897 08/07/98 EOSON,DAVID B 66898 08/07/98 FRANK,ERICH R 66899 08/07/98 HELEY,ROLAND B 66900 08/07/98 HINNENKAMP,GARY 66901 08/07/98 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 66902 08/07/98 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 66903 08/07/98 NAUGHTON,JOHN W 66904 08/07/98 PATTERSON,TERRILL T 66905 08/07/98 POSSERT,RYAN J 66906 08/07/98 RASMUSSEN,TIMOTHY J 66907 08/07/98 SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES 66908 08/07/98 STARK,RICHARD E 66909 08/07/98 MACY,RITA 66910 08/07/98 MCCUSKER,ELIZABETH A MANNING 66911 08/07/98 SOUTTER,CHRISTINE AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 14 8 8.12 1517.82 1392.92 680.00 723.38 1769.72 1674.52 1924.75 663.00 1460.92 1488912 640.00 1488.12 1454.24 1433.72 1460.92 1116.38 840.00 620.00 680.00 1460.92 183.75 245.13 127.50 70.00 (7 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT FAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 66912 08/07/98 THOMPSON,DEBRA J 66913 08/07/98 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 66914 0 8/ 0 7 /9 8 S CHROMER, JEFFREY J 66915 08/07/98 ANDERSON,EVERETT 66916 08/07/98 OSTROM,MARJORIE 66917 08/07/98 WENGER,ROBERT J 66918 08/07/98 BRANDSTROM,JULIET M 66919 08/07/98 BRANDSTROM,RYAN M. 66920 08/07/98 CONRADI,SHAWN A 66921 08/07/98 DICKSON,WARREN Co 66922 08/07/98 FEUCHT, DANIEL 66923 08/07/98 FEUCHT,KENNETH 66924 08/07/98 FINN,GREGORY S 66925 08/07/98 FLUG,ELAINE R 66926 08/07/98 FLUG,MEGAN L 66927 08/07/98 FRANK,LAURA 66928 08/07/98 HURLEY,LAUREN U 66929 08/07/98 KAREL,JULIE E 66930 08/07/98 LIEDL,MARY E 66931 08/07/98 NESS,CHERI MARIE 66932 08/07/98 NESS,MICHELLE C 66933 08/07/98 NIEMCZYK,BRIAN N 66934 08/07/98 PERRY,JENNIFER M 66935 08/07/98 RAHN,CARY 66936 08/07/98 ROBERTSON ,MARY E AMOUNT 404.21 1394.52 629.00 791.67 2084.22 1737.72 592.50 280.00 462.00 233.50 118.25 118.25 1197.02 511.00 357.50 56.00 474.00 50.25 297.00 116.25 350900 253.00 48.00 564.00 276.00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT. FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 66937 08/07/98 STIEN,KARIN M 66938 08/07/98 STIEN,MARY 66939 08/07/98 UNKLESBAY,VANESSA J 66940 08/07/98 BREHEIM,ROGER W 66941 08/07/98 GERMAIN,DAVID 66942 08/07/98 LOHMAN,JANINE D. 66943 08/07/98 NADEAU,EDWARD A 66944 08/07/98 NORDQUIST,RICHARD 66945 08/07/98 SCHULTZ,SCOTT M 66946 08/07/98 COONS,MELISSA 66947 08/07/98 GLASS,JEAN 66948 08/07/98 HOIUM,SHEILA 66.949 08/07/98 KONZEM,THOMAS A 66950 08/07/98 MICHALSKI,ANDREW M 66951 08/07/98 NEAMY,MARK W 66952 08/07/98 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 66953 08/07/98 SCHOEBERL,KAYLENE M 66954 08/07/98 SHOBERG,CARY J 66955 08/07/98 ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L. 66956 08/07/98 ANDERSON,JULIE M 66957 08/07/98 BADEN,ALISON L 66958 08/07/98 BADEN,MATHIAS 66959 08/07/98 BITTNER,KATIE C 66960 08/07/98 CHAPMAN,JENNY A 66961 08/07/98 CONLIN,PAMELA AMOUNT 304.50 1138.62 48.00 1641.52 1506.33 261.86 2010o62 1612.85 1153.98 463.72 750.78 743.98 52.00 107.25 130.00 1061.82 510.88 130.00 76.38 314.50 262.76 434.32 3.18.60 140.36 56.75 () 'v CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 66962 08/07/98 COOPER,JOSEPH W 192.00 66963 08/07/98 GOPLEN,NICHOLAS P 444957 66964 08/07/98 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 22081 66965 08/07/98 HAGSTROM,LINDSEY S 94925 66966 08/07/98 HAWKE,RYAN A 282.76 66967 08/07/98 HAWKINS,LISA A 95.00 66968 08/07/98 HEDLUND,LAUREL R 123.50 66969 08/07/98 HEIM,ANDREA J 182.00 66970 08/07/98 HEINN,REBECCA L 325.60 66971 08/07/98 HOLMGREN,LEAH M 246.38 66972 08/07/98 HORWATH,RONALD J 115.38 66973 08/07/98 HOULE,DENISE L 72.80 66974 08/07/98 HOWARD,STEPHANIE F 30.00 66975 08/07/98 HUPPERT,ERIN M 294.17 66976 08/07/98 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 434.00 66977 08/07/98 JOHNSON,STETSON 269.75 66978 08/07/98 KOEHNEN,MARY B 275.00 66979 08/07/98 KOEPKE,JENNIFER M 288.36 66980 08/07/98 LUHRS,REBEKAH M 13.00 66981 08/07/98 MAGNUSON,BETH M 82.13 66982 08/07/98 MEISEL,TAMBREY 16.10 66983 08/07/98 MEYER,HEATHER ANN 94.25 66984 08/07/98 MOTZ,ERIN M 126.75 66985 08/07/98 MCPHERSON,DEIRDRE 269.45 66986 08/07/98 PARR,GAIL L 306.07 u C3)1fl CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 66987 08/07/98 POWERS,JESSICA 66988 08/07/98 ROAN,CARIN K 66989 08/07/98 SACKMANN,LAURA C 66990 08/07/98 SCHLUETER,LOUISE E 66991 08/07/98 SHERRILL,MASON D 66992 08/07/98 SIMONSON,JUSTIN M 66993 08/07/98 SIVERSON,OLAF L 66994 08/07/98 SMITLEY,SHARON L 66995 08/07/98 SWANER,JESSICA 66996 08/07/98 THIBODEAU,KELLY M 66997 08/07/98 TROENDLE,ALEISHA M 66998 08/07/98 WARMANJOANNE M 66999 08/07/98 WARNER,CAROLYN 67000 08/07/98 WEDES,CARYL H 67001 08/07/98 WESTBERG,JENNIFER 67002 08/07/98 WOLKERSTORFER,HEATHER L 67003 08/07/98 WOODMAN,ALICE E 67004 08/07/98 BOSLEY,CAROL 67005 08/07/98 DISKERUD,HEATHER A 67006 08/07/98 MALDONADO,ANGELA M 67007 08/07/98 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 67008 08/07/98 SHERRILL,CAITLIN A 67009 08/07/98 SPANGLER,EDNA E 67010 08/07/98 ANTON,SARAH E 67011 08/07/98 BEHAN,JAMES AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 201.50 242.20 416.88 73.00 229.25 277 .00 208.40 237.33 392.38 797.87 450.45 68.25 122.95 109.50 388.75 51.00 117.80 89.89 237.50 90.00 164.00 120.00 175.11 180.00 1193.72 �8 �J CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK.DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 67012 08/07/98 CHAPEAU,GREG M 75.00 .67013 08/07/98 GLASS ,BRIDGET M 120o00 67014 08/07/98 JAHN,DAVID J 1274.09 67015 08/07/98 KOSKI,JOHN F 503.14 .67016 08/07/98 KYRK,BREANNA K 154.35 67017 08/07/98 LONETTI,JAMES F 503914 67018 08/07/98 MATTESON,FRANK M 198.00 67019 08/07/98 POWERS,NICOLE L 78.00 67020 08/07/98 PRINS, KELLY M 72.00 67021 08/07/98 SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M 182970 67022 08/07/98 SEYLER,KIMBERLY A 162.00 67023 08/07/98 SKRYPEK,JOSHUA L 276.00 67024 08/07/98 STEINHORST, JEFFREY 182970 67025 08/07/98 SWANSON,LYLE 1472.28 67026 08/07 198 SWANSON, SARAH C 208.00 67027 08/07/98 SWANSON,VERONICA 932.81 67028 08/07/98 YOUNG,DILLON J 118.56 67029 08/07/98 AICHELE,CRAIG J 797954 67030 08/07/98 MULVANEY,DENNIS M 1628.12 67031 08/07/98 PRIEM, STEVEN A. 1325940 67032 08/07/98 YANG,YA Y 280.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 08/07/98 THOMALL, DAVID 2261.88 297,623.69 �J 4 Agenda. Item GZ MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT Final Plat PROJECT: Highwood Estates No. Four DATE: August 14, 1998 INTRODUCTION dorsed........,�..�_- Modif i e � JReJ ected Date Mike Kampmeyer is requesting that the city council approve the Highwood Estates No. Four final plat. Mr. Kampmeyer represents the property owners, Greatland Homes. This final plat would create 27 lots for houses and is south of Highwood Avenue, west of Lakewood Drive. (See the maps on pages 3 - 5.) BACKGROUND On October 14, 1996, the council tabled action on the proposed preliminary plat until December 9, 1996 at the applicant's request. This tabling was to give the applicants time to revise the plat to lessen the grading and tree loss on the site. The developers also had a meeting with the neighbors to review their concerns with the project. On December 9, 1996, the city council gave three approvals for the project. These included the alteration of a slope over 25 percent in grade, the preliminary plat. (subject to five conditions) and street width code variation for the streets in the plat. (See the minutes starting on page 6.) On December 8, 1997, the city council approved a one -year time extension for this plat. This time extension was subject to the December 9, 1996 conditions of approval. DISCUSSION Mr. Kampmeyer's contractor is progressing with the plat. The contractor has installed the utilities and will start the street construction soon. Mr. Kampmeyer has finished all the conditions the council required for final plat approval. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Highwood Estates No. Four final plat. Approval is subject to the: 1. Surveyor changing Southcrest Court to Southcrest Avenue on the final plat. 2. County recording the deeds, deed restrictions and covenants required by the city. p: sec 13 -28/h ig hwd4. fi n Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Proposed Final Plat 4. Preliminary Plat 5. 12 -9 -96 Council Minutes 6. Proposed Final Plat (Separate Attachment) Attachment 1 . 16 1. HUNTINGTON CT. 2. 0AKRIDGE LA. 17 I 1. CURRIE CT. 2. VALLEY VIEW CT. 3. LAKEWOOD CT. 74 LAN CT. CT. V 3DXWOOD AV. v a o 68 cc CARVER Ci OVERLOOK CrR. o ti �i c� tZr 0 o 25 O t LOCATION MAP •� N 2 Attachment.2 7 A 9 , \ M - .; �; .4 •b-� R A t �y,�` . , • _ 6 L .95 935 �936� v '�a N N eo go ��,� 3as.s �� V a < 939 * 6 9 Po osZ + 942 4, + R" 00 y _ �=` ""!' 95a ` .♦ ItA 9� �% -� `�� '' /31 At 9 5 _ o "- W 946 949 j ..• : $� ,� '�_.e; rtr -.- �, �► �, <2) s 7 _ �: J - 3 107.03 1 f � j _ 2 2 7 5 = S �) U ^' -� 4' i /. _. t • N �3 N ' � � , S 4. 9 955 > > 956 959; 960: N N M �"'� 1 (3) �i� �3 �� orb N N N 32 In � � � `i ): 117 �0 ,07. 3 . .0 840T 7 N 8 _ !0 234. nug A LG26. ob `' Ism I owe — sw AL _� ANVIL ac r43 `ti,97 , ic ed ! 1"t.L' - /yp - ! ! oc Ar t 11j (!o) O 1.00at.. ate 964 N r �/� � � h 3 f � � � Co � G N ='`N 2322 23 44 CO . c� N N �� 4 ,7z 1 ,. 9 ' w N .o'� v N N % . - / �(�� fu LL p :•s .....1 283 + � N Gr :•� y 11 S �' ;• F J W �? � .� �. � P y •� _ m ,•, "� ,�;. N 1021 d� 0 1020 a �, . _ ;: l a ,� •1 ��8� �C .� �_ . 1 I - �,� - 1021 . . 7 ' Q o �s 9 v� 1050 O �s> 8 1031 , 32 � ° . - 3 =^ O UT L OT - - _ N z, �� F �.- 1 a 2 5 N � A Z'�� 1043 ` C 1042 0: 09 ,, - ,.� . _ 1049 140 ` ` i " $' L ° �•� '-- 1053 . Sol U o -_ "s - -' �.�e� r .• Q 1052 , _ — � ,�, , 1 ! A - 140 1059 T � p: .r .. ... 0 . Q O x`20 7� a 1x63 �r .� ` a� � 16601119) �° b � *v : _ 1062 r Q : s , • o I : ti 0 ?o. rs W , , . Cl T Q�¢ti� Y (26: ;'� 1069 1072 r , 40 1 Z 1070 2 o ) 1 �' ! n fA � :'� 5c � • 1081, � , - - �/ 3 _ d 1082 • ales _ - o '�Zg'.� 319.6' ��. 3D 10 p` - sX N 4! .76 '4 r Lo 2329f 'a 2339 b 2 3 . • 109 o 1090 x-1101 fro .. a .�, p o $ 1102 s 2328 1.90 Iy y + , GONYEKS . �� •- 9JO.S Izo d o � 3g� S 'C 3 A„ a 1113' 1112 PLEASANTVIEW PARK 2334 f 23,E ,z l X110 3 , 3Z ., 5 q 1123 X1122 ,�,o 0 2319 _ : E 270. AK X40 o �. t� 24 0 2309 �C° ..� �. 23 .. �- orn').. o (m) s erne O !e fe ^ PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 'Q N 3 980 Ca -1- � � ; K f -�) �y -• - , X X983 -, , , .3 ,•,. - tt om` - * a * M) ,; 9 99 4 4 � doo . ♦ w 1001 i 7/ V ... � 8.61 alt . e 8 4 � �? d o � 3g� S 'C 3 A„ a 1113' 1112 PLEASANTVIEW PARK 2334 f 23,E ,z l X110 3 , 3Z ., 5 q 1123 X1122 ,�,o 0 2319 _ : E 270. AK X40 o �. t� 24 0 2309 �C° ..� �. 23 .. �- orn').. o (m) s erne O !e fe ^ PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 'Q N 3 Attachment 3 Vr 4 SU*42'35*W 646.16 14 ',*. .;;: . . • a C/ v lbv- ZJ tou PROPOSED FINAL PLAT HIGHWOOD ESTATES NO, 4 4 i N j, • ? > C) N883r52'E 393.85 �A z V1 > Of LCjI 64 0 .011 10 > rn z 0 M Cf, 0C d Ce -4 9 40 C ri is x 1 W t I 10 0) Cd Ir f I A La � G ,(.. _ . ' _ /►160 9i l 1GG oc• . t I _ 7 1 J — P -4 N$8'37520E 162-911 ( A 110.00 N881752"'IE 0 A j I L C MAMIE AVENUE Vr 4 SU*42'35*W 646.16 14 ',*. .;;: . . • a C/ v lbv- ZJ tou PROPOSED FINAL PLAT HIGHWOOD ESTATES NO, 4 4 i N j, • ? > C) > • 0 z V1 > > 0 > rn z 0 > rn 0C d Ce -4 9 40 C Vr 4 SU*42'35*W 646.16 14 ',*. .;;: . . • a C/ v lbv- ZJ tou PROPOSED FINAL PLAT HIGHWOOD ESTATES NO, 4 4 i N 0 : t o Ce -4 9 40 ri Vr 4 SU*42'35*W 646.16 14 ',*. .;;: . . • a C/ v lbv- ZJ tou PROPOSED FINAL PLAT HIGHWOOD ESTATES NO, 4 4 i N ICZJ- c .s` b 4J Q T - -- I PROPOSED PLAT OF HRGHWOOD ESTATES NO.4 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MN. ------------------------------------------------ Q 7 / ' A- F: -F-iM -i?- - - - - - - — (_J j •' — j ' a� (`t / / —T' --- T - - - -- ------- 1- - - - - -1 ,.. r - - - -- - - - - -1 r--- -- / 1 — — — u1 �.. I 1 Uj I u ~ I i �_I :i I ni • 1 ______♦ _ �Yr... ,. r Z' f i 1 u �" i i 1 �'� Z I i.i •- I 1 % , ( . R �- •__ i A. � SCALE W FEET % 14 triiAw - - - , *M ' = J I =.Z • M M qA tM N, v�iplwa , i II1NfyA f �� 1 SCALE: 1 WCH 60 FEET 1 �• � rMA� � �- '� '.1 J I aOOOS AOM 0[N1Ap1r1i 01G t �� ' i. %% ` �� ,��' 2746 1f r01wAt 00L am" A CAW^ an .t - `, U� s n� / ,, s �(� . - "��'i'" �� 'C tI ' y N * Q. *AD ui x ww --------- - -• - -- - •------ - - - - -: - L_ -- -- —, ' - -- f i �- - -- - -- _ i _ -. . 1w�lrooR w. Mfn •' a 1 �� ! , t O 'nr i �` - -� - - -- - -' t:1 I �•_ VAIPW ON w. MME YA>•� i = ,, 1`� s foot an _ . •_• 111 C3 . ' . _ _ I ' ; '`. ' ��" �' _ -- -- �`, �: — — �'� 1 a: .1100 MR 1A..O.M lose "woo" SOWN to 4 -- - -- --- - aM -- -------- _ _ JL — _ — -. — — -- — ._ J— /� — �' :•�'� - - - - -- - % �� 1 Sam MIA&M 1 7.0 ..n0 AM , i � �� (•-- ------- ------- ------- -•• - - - - -- i10Mll , ` \ Nw ; �� % i � ` i; � ��`, �`. `. I AWASK 1/f I mm" M R % \ l ��. __ - -- ,• '' ��, '` 1 ♦ ( ` � ` - �► 5 ` ` �, ` �� , I itl•K M'�1OR Ti �wOM .r'rr'r �! �M O �� }� �i . `` t IL ; `�,�` = I wt M so "d ow 11rf eel t,fM • ewe A l l ' % ` ` ` �� .- r I r' r rr �♦ ``% `�_�✓ - ' ,`� j, �IO�/ r �� --------- - - - - -- ' M d I.t 1. �ttap IMR*` / tiff 1 1L — /' ► �/ ♦ r ' . - -_- _---------- _►`� I r M so Nf M tot mod r Mt port so 1M A � ` (' ♦r,, L 4 � AI -, % •f ` M ..� °� / 1 wwq► w 60 of Lob wm1 o 0000M • _ i ` _y: ` % �4 rMSPR f I %�," wd.Ap M fa *4 •M mw •ww �M/O , r ` - '4 ' - % NA7 / I • pent w be a" �Yw M odf LM 1. 30 Lod % - ; . ' ♦ __LI _ % O . 1 a" of fly. n.iM.w wow d OW tM S. "mm merommot `�•rq A !__tiy� -. _ ; . 7 ; • , a so M rw owrlu.ed sower N we •0d momor mar �� F;- _t_�_ ;,r S •.. �. f ; ; ; �r �. 1 .• AM at w W 0 .wept •+�0 M w J 200 or ` " - ,,, �� w.ee..wlMr eMwp IF• wwrm 0.o M "m tM L pent d• tlww ui 00 *WOW N eMwle. 00 86ewA1i to 00, OW fto ue prfrrwpOrw M to Met do.erOM ..weft t` \ •�� f 1 !r `, f O Wit. I 1N 00 Aet Orww 00 N/M. 0 ONAINo 90 cc : �,� i jl 1 . 0 1 OWW AY M M MA 9sm ON p+MgpMe• M •N Oxman" of •` t IfwrOOr 1100010 t•' • M promefte eftooft 1"m ft* am" " * somoo0 M ewoowb t. m•. tot fern w. an !� 1 - ti a wig s' ` N. ..af. f.. .L. `� `r pMw.Ow M M prw&p lMM .aver► Mona _ -- -. — aC — — — — ... — --- -- - -- ----------- ---- -- - --- ----------- ��_ r �1 I t :Z tlrw0 h Mw N eMartw a e...wA/ M ON ho — — — — — — — — �- — — ; ..d far r ua , a I..efO.p Io.11. '`. +p : t o o) 1 q ... r.. 1f» prMerlOw.1 .f •» r••••�. w■•+a boubw0bW '%% �! I • ; ~ �.. iM Itwrw 6 to 00 moo ~ r .i *so& on" Mwq �•� ---------- - --- -- I `%% = 1 �' (/ i. { t.2 tM L wt m worm w wM M as wed /N ' I ` M w �` j :.� I w ',' Mot 10AIr000 Neeft *nod" Io M saw" I t_3 1 1 1 1 J . I mute Am SMANOM tAm"s Mc *root t� ED ID I I - 440 -N.. �N � 1Sf M tt►frl � II�AIrM 1M /per I IpfJm OMMd eltrrwlo. N rfLf • rNr 00 o elmmN now or for tats 1 - _ - - -- erg It tote Attachment 5 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, December 9, 1996 Council Chambers, Municipal Building . Meeting No. 96.25 1. Highwood 4th Addition Preliminary Plat (South of Highwood Ave., West of Lakewood Dr.) a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the report. C. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following persons were heard Bruce Cunningham, 2329 Oak Heights Court E Arthur Werthauser, Roar Development, 2795 Hwy 55 E., Eagan MaryLee Maida, 2322 Highwood Avenue Thomas Maida Bill Kortus, 1050 South McKnight Peter Sullivan, 1022 Lakewood Paul & Debra Madsen, 2360 Mamie (letter delivered by Peter Sullivan and read by the.Mayor) Dawn Deare, 1043 Lakewood Drive South Bruce. Cunningham, 2329 Oak Heights Court E Brian Schmidt, 2344 Highwood Avenue Charles DeSotto, Attorney re resenting the Maida 's David Warner, 1063 Lakewood Erive South Alexis Warner, 1063 Lakewood Drive South Marcia Willis, 1053 Lakewood Drive South Bill Tingerthal, 2434 Southcrest Avenue Joel Wendl, 1060 McKnight Road South (submitted letter) 21 12_g.c 0 d. Councilmember Rossbach moved aooroval of alteration of a slope over 25 e rcent in grade for the c6n'struction- -of Hiohwood Estates -No. 4 preliminary plat. based on the fol1owinQ 1) The degree of alteration will not affect the basic character of the slope; 2) The alteration will not affect the importance of the slope to the character of the area; 3) The Council approved a similar request in 1987 for the Gonyea Company to build the Oak Heights development in the area. .Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Allens ach, Koppen Rossbach Nays - Counci member Carlson e. Councilmember Rossbach 1. Sign an agreement with, the City that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all City requirements. b.* P1 ace temporary orange safety fencing, s i l t fence and signs at the grading limits. c. Have NSP install street lights in three locations, primarily at street intersections. The exact location and type of lights shal 1 be subject to the City Engineer's approval. d. Pay the City for the cost of traffic-control, street identification and.no- parking signs. e. Provide all required and necessary easements. f. demolish or move the existing shed behind 2322 Highwood Avenue on proposed Lot 11, Block 1. Abandon any wells or septic systems within the plat, subject to the Environmental Health Official's approval. 2.* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These pTans shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the City code. b. The grading plan shall: (1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. (2) Include contour information for the land that the street .construction will disturb. (3) Provide a permanent stormwater detention pond to control the rate of discharge from the development to pre - development levels at the end of the storm water pipe between Lots 6 and 7, Block 1 near the existing pond. (4) Show housing styles that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large trees. (5) All proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 shall be identified on the proposed construction plans. The City Engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. 1 )_a_( (6) Show all retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls more than 4 feet tall require a building permit from the City. (7) Be revised to show the undisturbed buffer areas as described in the letter dated November 26, 1996. These shall include: (a) On the east side of the develo ment, provide at least'a 15- foot -wide undisturbe_ buffer on Lots 4 and 5, Block 2. (b) On the south side of the development, provide at least a 30 -foot -wide undisturbed buffer on Lot 3, Block 1. (c) On the west side of the develo ment, provide at least a 40•foot -wide undisturbe buffer on Lots 8 and 9. Block 1. c. Change the plat to show the street curves next to Lots 2 -5 and Lots 8 -11, Block 1 with a minimum of a 150 -foot radius on the centerline. Also change the lot lines in the plat to make them radial to the new street centerlines. d. Change the grading and utility plans to follow the revised street and lot design required in Condition 2(c) above. In addition, move the proposed sanitary sewer line between Lots 9 and 10, Block 1 to between Lots 10 and 11, Block 1. Thi s change i s to drop one manhol a and to l essen the amount of sewer pipe. This sewer line change may require changing the grading plan to make the grades meet City standards. e. Provide a tree plan for the City Engineer's ap roval before grading or final lat approval. This plan sha 1 show where the developer wi 1 remove, save, move or replace large trees. This plan also must show the size, s ecies and location of any trees that the developer wi 1 plant as replacement trees. All deciduous trees the developer plants shall be at least 2 -112 inches in diameter. There shall be no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. f. The streets shall be 28 feet wide from face to face of the concrete curb and gutter with no parking on one side. go That there be 25-foot front yard setbacks allowed at the discretion of staff if it helpd the grading problems. 3. Change the plat as follows: a. Add and change drainage and utility easements as required by the City Engineer. b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear roperty lines and five feet wide along the side property F ines. c. Show Nemitz Court as Maida Court on the final plat and construction plans. 4. Provide all easements. required by the City Engineer. 5. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The City Engineer shall include in the developers agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the Director of Community Development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. The developer must complete these conditions before the City issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Allens ach, Koppen, Rossbach Nays - Counci member Carlson Councilmember Rossbach introduced_the ..followin-a Resol.ution---and moved its .••r •/ 96 -12 -144 STREET WIDTH CODE VARIATION - HIGHWOOD ESTATES NO. 4 WHEREAS, Mr. Arthur Werthauser of Roar Development requested a variation from the City code. WHEREAS, this code variati appl to the Highwood Estates No. 4 devel o ment g that is south of Highwood Avenue, west of Lakewood Drive and east of McKnight oad. WHEREAS, the legal description for this property is: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 28, Runge 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota; described as fol 1 ows ; Lot 2 and the West one half of Lots 5 and 6, Highwood Heights; Part of Lot 1 and P art of the East one half of Lots 5 and 6 of Highwood Heights; Lot 3. except the North 396 feet of the West 110 feet of Highwood Heights. WHEREAS, Section 29- 52(a)(9) of the Maplewood City Code requires that local residential streets shall 32 feet in width, measured between faces of curbs. WHEREAS, the app p roposing licant is 28- foot -wide streets with no parking on one side. WHEREAS, this requires a variation of four feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows: The Maplewood ewood Planning Commission reviewed this request on August 19 1996. The 0 • P code Planning Commission recommended that the Council approve the proposed variation. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 9 ,1996. City staff • P rroundin property ublished a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the su g p p y P s owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a c hance to present speak and to written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City .staff . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the above - described variation subject to no parking on one side of the streets and the developer paying the City for the cost of no- parking signs. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Allens ach, Koppen, Rossbach Nays - Counci member Carlson 9 ,� n Agenda. Item G3, -",.Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorsed Modifie .... To: City Manager Rejecte From: Jeff Schroeder, Community Development Intern Date Subject: Conditional Use Permit Review Day Care Facilit Location: 1735 Kennard Street Date: August 12, 1998 INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit for the day care facility located at 1735 Kenard Street (Presentation Church of the Blessed Virgin Mary) is due for review. (Please seethe maps on pages two and three.) BACKGROUND On August 23, 1982, the city council approved the CUP to operate the day care center subject to: 1. Correction of all life- safety and building code deficiencies prior to program start up. 2. If no nuisance conditions exist at the end of one year, the permit may be renewed by the Council. On September 12, 1983, September 12, 1988 and September 27, 1993, the Council renewed the CUP for five years. DISCUSSION The day care center is meeting all of the Council required conditions. The staff is not aware of any complaints or problems with this facility. RECOMMENDATION The council should review the CUP for the day care facility at 1735 Kennard Street again only if the owner or operator proposes a major change or if a problem develops. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map Attachment 1 .Sll El CT . f. �lr U �:EHILL RD. DEMO AVE AVE AVE � SEX T/d�T� CERVAIS AVE. } CER1/NS G£MNS CdNA15 AV Ct. CWW0IREW AVE VKwC DR. CAS11-E SHERREN AVE. �; '- A � COPE �n ti E Kn Lake AVE � COPE AVE LARK � CT. t � ASE � iii LARK RK t AVE. �n �- or �n uuff CO. < R0. � LAURIE RD. ��.,� Cl LAURIE = RD. � � t R0. 0 W � S URST � � 3 AVE. JUNCTION AVE. b � Z g tn CO. C � VftE AYE m BLNWE AVE o � � SCE AVE t LA. � ELM IDLE AVE � �«� � S40% 8EL►IOIJT AVE. � u � �� •� AV E SK1LL1yW AVE. t. SH� � W1RRfS AVE �' ROSEMP000 AVE K 0 WAS XVE- Ni AV. � AVE S D NUG AVE gov COU'F'SE JA'/ u I Av. E su ME W - '�• FRIS81E AVE. w.t RIP LEY w Cr. Z > o MPLEY AVE • s o Ix • tg t; t; CO }. -o Lola o m KI oPHI �► ST. � � v PRICE AVE PRICE 1►v - Y 0 0 SAINT PAUL LOCATION MAP 2 Q N Attachment 2 alki `! � ^ �g � y ,. , o Is 0 (40) 20 5 ,2.0� 21) 5 � h _ -- r 4 F4 . w _ r_3jwl T I S O wl -- y� - ;�4� j li -r 9 27 4 � W Y. 4c J 0 J W M W x 3) ( 2D) 1 - 7 o C dW Q S f S?f 4.28 tin 10 0 ( A tr 5 .40 in Ra N 10 i, 5. t r0 'S ul t3S.�5 0 i 744 i55 3 1 9.41 ac. o v e CHURCH OF 'THE PRESENTYkTION OF THE BLESSED V IR61N MARY 17S L.ARPEN AVENUE SAINT PAUL ( �( t � I J\ d _ 295. 4 147 1 147, 2 s 37 (e) �► ` �I (7 , j $ 698 27 l s -2+ `� 3' 2.� Z4__ F(i; (G4) (G d rs. 2ro Q4 126 (.5 Z �' CP4 1 30.12 b• -- 2 1649.0 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 3 4 N 35 $0) 1 5. Sr 1,¢ ?9 Ti. (5)) 17 33 295.8 - 1740 20 Q `1730 4 �o 57 J r� C73; C 9 s (Gol 22 �o • 708 ( ?2) 28 2 9 � . �- �I (7 , j $ 698 27 l s -2+ `� 3' 2.� Z4__ F(i; (G4) (G d rs. 2ro Q4 126 (.5 Z �' CP4 1 30.12 b• -- 2 1649.0 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 3 4 N Agenda Item (',4 Action by Counoil: Endorse MEMO RANDUM Ito d if i e d........�..... To: City Manager Re3ecte Jeff Schroeder Community Devel Intern 7ate From: � y p Subject: Conditional Use Permit Review - Saint Paul Water Utili Location: 1900 Rice Street North Date: August 10, 1998 INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit for Saint Paul Water Utility is due for review. This permit is for building expansion at 1900 Rice Street North. (Please see the maps on pages two through four.) Saint Paul Water Utility is constructing one new building and adding onto two existing buildings at the water treatment plant. BACKGROUND On June 10, 1996, the city council approved a CUP and the design plans for this project. The CUP approval was subject to four conditions (.see council minutes starting on page five.) DISCUSSION The contractor is currently working on the project. Staff has not received any complaints and is not aware of any problems with this business. RECOMMENDATION The council should review the CUP for 1900 Rice Street North again in one year to examine the projects condition. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Overall Site Plan 4. 7 -29 -97 Council Minutes Attachment 1 LITTLE CANADA 49 36 �s J 30 49 wi I kui 10 57 58 LOCATION MAP 2 Oet Lf n AVE. C GSTON PRICE 4 N 11.0 � .ROSELAWN AVENUE , 4 Z4 VOL IJ 7 •. S . • s =' r ' I is _; + ty VAL too . AMUSEMENT CITY . 'AMUSEMENT PARK 4 = ' 2G ' y ll r 1 1 , 40 N. kyrAL 88.9e60- it A _ _ it - • T4so...r... _.... '- ;ST. PAUL WATER UTILITY ' �. 30 :�.''. PROPERTY 04 (5.50 QA- u l ::5 t L )Q YW N 67i - cr. (j I N 1 • o ,y`:', 5 (2 e, do 09) 2._.._ Q _ ., of -0) : W = �Qa), Q(l,1 • 1 _ • - , is (14) 1 _ 6C ; 162 miss is swrf 1 1 1 1 1 1 r� S. 19ac c qt of st .g' i S 0 0 _ r" L� uj �• it i1 �2 � i0 . (� - - - - -- --- - - - - -- (L 1 37 PA v L w 4 R WORKS 30 Z4 �! 1lStai. (t.50ax. �+ L.SS ac• (3 �� •• � sl �B) PROPERTY LINE I ZONING MAP 3 4 N - f ' N 1 • o SO f t0 _ • - , is , * hip T. VV �tM� 70 _-j IL ,� .' It deb (4L) 1 IO ss) 4 j , 7 s 4 i 1 a 7 S 4 t I 1% ° a Jt t /�� L� 2- uj AP • cr i • . ., . ZtS •(t jc ac CR PLAZA 10 •e ,SHOPPING CENTER- s 4 -� SN >t. s .. .•• i _ cl) Iris rb � tC - ? ' ;moo t • to t >ti : 1 /1 s 14 1 i �• + ac •r f 31 r 4 n a I .7 _ j i fro' It ARPENTEUR AVENUE - ; ' ' 1. ;y..� ;'.. ' IA' • 1� � �/• AN O f °. - .:. ..• ' - - . E R R f L L'S . ; r_ . .. .. PROPERTY LINE I ZONING MAP 3 4 N Attachment T ....0.'.'.0.0.0.•......:. , , ..r.. , ..0...0.0.0 ...... ,� j , ;,. ,. SYLVAN STREET • -FTTI—M • **.so 0.- 1 7-711 7 -7 0 * _0 • 0.0.00.00 '100 a i JL TDIDC�000 osooss" In 000 WAM1MW# * s o * o �.. fir...."" _.._ _.,. - � ; � � R �__. so o • o s o l -0000,*** • i! t . 49 000l Alin- a JIM Overall Site Plan > < 14 Proposed Buildin I��I Attachment 4 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M..., Monday, August 11, 1997 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No 97-15 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1, 7:00 P.M. (7:17 P.M.): Saint Paul Water Utility Building Expansion ( Rice Street) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public ,hearing regarding a proposal by the Saint Paul Water Utility to construct one new building and add onto two existing buildings at the water treatment plant at 1900 Rice Street North. The building will be used to house the Water Utility's existing and anticipated future chemicals, chemical handling equipment and chemical storage tanks. b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Milo Thompson presented the Planning Commission report. e. Boardmember Mat Ledvina presented the Community Design Review Board report. f. -City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings. g. Mayor Bastian. opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Kou Vang, representing the St. Paul Water Utility, the applicant Laureen Sherman, 1867 Beaumont Street MAYOR SASTIAN ATION OF THE PROJECT IN TO 867 EAU NT SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON AYES -.ALL 5 MAYOR BASTIAN RESUMED THE PUBLIC HEARING (ITEM G -1) REGARDING THE ST. PAUL WATER UTILITY BUILDING EXPANSION Kou Vang (Second appearance) John Kendall, 1852 Beaumont Street h. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. Conditional Use Permit following win solution ndm ved its i. Mayor Bastian introduced the o Q_� e adontion: 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ST. PAUL WATER UTILITY EXPANSION WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Water Utility has requested a conditional use permit to construct a new building and add onto two existing buildings at the water treatment plant. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1900 Rice Street North. The legal description is: SECTION 18 TOWNSHIP 299 RANGE 22 IN THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEW OOD REVISED DESCRIPTION NUMBER 175 A SPECIFIC PART OF SEC 18, TN 299 R 22. WHEREAS, the histo r y of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On July 21, 1997, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this permit. 8 -11 -97 August 11 1997 the City Council held a public hearing. 2. on g y g. The City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the .surrounding Pe ro rty owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing P a chance to s eak and resent written statements. The Council also P P considered dered re orts and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The City approves this permit because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve an activity, process, materials, equipment or y . methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air ollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6..' The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize . the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the City. The .Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of Council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The Council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. 7 8 -11 -97 4. Notify the City Fire Chief of chemicals in use, changes in federal, state, or local regulations related to chemicals used or sto on site and the water y P utilit pan to address the changes. Notification shall . occur before implementaion of changes at water utility site. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes -al's Desi Approval Ma yor Bastian loved to approve. the building elevations (stamped July 19. � y 996 and the site Plan (stamped June 19. 1997) for the building x ansi on t 90 Ric St r t North. ' the he following 1. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Complete the following before the City issues a building permit: a. Provide a grading, drainage, utility and eros ion control tan to the City Engineer for approval. The erosion P y g . control plan shall comply with ordinance requirements. The drai nage P 1 an shall include replacing the bituminous swale with a pervious material. 3. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The City determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. c. The City receives an agreement that will allow the City to complete any unfinished work. 4. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 5. Add handicap- accessible parking spaces to comply with ADA requirements for each new building in each new parking lot. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson ayes •all 8 -11 -97 E I AGENDA NUMBER 1 AGENDA REPORT MEMORANDUM TO: Michael A.. McGuire, City Manager FROM: Tom Eastman, Community Center Mana RE: BUDGET CHANGE (MCC Massage) DATE: August 11, 1998 for the August 24, 1998 City Council Meeting INTRODUCTION Endorsa - A .0 -- ' Modif i ed..,...�.�...- Rejecte Date The Maplewood Community Center has had a contract with Sister Rosalind Gefre's Professional Massage Center for their services since September 1996. Under the contract the MCC collects all fees for massages and pays Sister Rosalind on a monthly basis. Due to a growth of the program, I am requesting that the City Council grant an expenditure budget increase in the amount of $12,000 for 1998. The additional monies will be used to cover expenses for Sister Rosalind increased services. This increase will generate an additional $13,500 in revenue in 1998 for the MCC. SUMMARY Year to date (July) expenditures are $12,050 and revenues are $20,842. I am requesting the following budget increases to cover the remainder of 1998. Expenditures Fees For Service Revenues Program Fees RECOMMENDATION 602 - 61.2- 065 -4480 $12,000 602 - 612- 065 -3641 $13,500 Action by Council. Staff recommends City Council approval of the above requested budget changes. Aripndp. Item G � Action by Council: AGENDA REPORT - Endorsed Modified Re To: City Manager Michael McGuire Date From: Chief of Police Donald S, Winger Subject: National Association of Telecommunication Officers & Advisors Award Date: August 17, 1998 Introduction The Maplewood Police Department has received an award from the National Association of Telecommunication Officers & Advisors. Background For the past several years, the Maplewood Police Department has produced a monthly television show called Your Police Report on the Government Television Network (Channel 16). On August 17, 1998, representatives of the Government Television Network resented the hosts of the show, Officers Dale Razskazoff and Stephen Heinz, with the 1997 First Place Programming Award for the Public Safety Division (Under $250,000). This award was won at NATOA's national conference in Tucson, Arizona, and given to the Ramsey - Washington Suburban Cable Commission, the administrators of GTN. We have been told that it is very likely that that Maplewood Police Department will also win this award for their 1998 programming. Recommendation It is recommended that the City of Maplewood accept this award and commend Officers Razskazoff and Heinz for their excellent work on Your Police Report* Action Required Submit to the City Council for their review and approval. DWS:js Agenda Item G77 Memorandum To: Bruce Anderson, Parks and Recreation Di ctor From: Paul Schlingman, Chief Building E Re: Request for City Contingency monies for unanticipated repairs Action by Council: Endorsed dor Date: July 15, 1998, for the July 24th, 1998 City Council Meeting En n d r i e Rej ectea Date Introduction: The Building Maintenance Division has incurred some unexpected repairs during the first half of 1998. These repairs were not anticipated when the 1998 budget was prepared. The unanticipated repairs for which City contingency monies are requested total $ 8,189.23. The building maintenance division is responsible for the repair and maintenance of all City Public buildings, both anticipated and unanticipated. Our budget for the repair and /or replacement in 1998 was 3,000.00 dollars. This account is currently depleted due to the following expenditures: 1, Installed new vehicle exhaust system at Public Works. $ 2,623.00 (Required by O.S.H.A. to meet air quality standards) 2. Repair path lighting. $ 5045.00 (Trail lighting between M.C.C. and City Hall was shorted out by heavy rains upon inspection the electrician found lighting was installed improperly .) 3. Replace Hot Gas bypass valve at city hall. $ 474.00 4. Replace condenser unit in police department. $ 1,488.00 5. Find/Repair hole in condensing unit P.W. $ 1,559.23 The Maintenance Division is requesting that City Council allocate $ 8,189.23 Dollars from the contingency fund, to Building operations account 101 -115 -4410. Agenda Item 68 Memorandum To: Bruce Anderson, Parks and Recreations Director From: Paul Schlingman, Chief Building Eng' Re: Upgrading Underground Diesel Storage Tank Date: July 28, 1998 Introduction: Action by Council Endorsed.. Modi��.ed IRGjected Date According to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regulations, the City is required to upgrade all active underground storage tanks by the end of 1998. The Maintenance Division is responsible for one 2,000 Gal. underground diesel storage tank. The tank is used to store fuel for City Hall's emergency generator. Background: City staff first received a letter from the M.P.C.A. in April of 1997. The letter informed us of the upgrade needed by the end of 1998. They corresponded to us on May 6th, 1998 reminding us of the required upgrade. Staff is currently in the bidding process of this project. The tank does not need to be replaced. It does need to be upgraded with leak detection equipment and overflow protection. The cost of the project is 6,941.00 dollars. I have attached copies of the compliance letters and one bid for your review. Recommendation: City staff is requesting that 6,941.00 dollars be allocated from the Cities Contingency fund, to the building operations account 101 -115- 000 -4480. To cover project costs. O G fn I'Ro WJL.A" fA 'ION /' a "i•'I•o♦,, .r l �r ` - •rw,,, ,.scats. �' •a i,.wr.Ilta, .J••••`^ � .,aa.+ ?.:t�.....� �._ _ r/ \` /��[ • _ ..` � /_,I'^ \ a� , '•� -� °".,.. " +- •'y•�` � i :. ',; ( :;Y'i�'•; ."•�` ' .•' . 1 y •./ l y str v. • .'b� J � r - °� T: � `�' / •/i s i• `+Ir.'•� •::., i •� " •, � + i'J 4' \,/ !• J ,ri•�`s•y f�•�''•., -�_._- •' °.h t [ y .Ly'• _.... :+4 ��If.. ..y.,: ..._. '•�,', .�:. a•� �. i :•i' rrr �•- .._....� ! i •r io 3,• �.•- "��i��`'�, } `^+. IIr I 1 •.f a. 5 {♦; .. t. -.✓. • -1 isvr `• rr '•l,; .taa ..': 1 Y •'.4 '•♦ \;' iIt•u_f•'. t � „ \ \, C � .!./!7 %• ia rr • oL \, .fJIA•'Yi J`1�• * ♦ \ t '.�L J I I +r � .��6 \Yr,.� i/• •fit` - „ \ ! P , t /��ir:',',. P;, ,.. �':�j t tY'Z'.: •y qt [.,I,,. ,s4 JL•' ..J FP. ., i� ara .�+ ',S;'. e:•.v• ,at..a {i.� .ssa i• •Ofi yr, Il r i ♦ •r: _, //, ' rsI •• i Y �,[ viT1 • r�•irtt ', •• i• .51 1 + 0 ., �,'aWAal:.r•., • 4 t l a. - , +�1� }.,f • !•, 1 !. •. ,.Lbwx?, i.f•:,.�4 5,0 is [:'f a SfA rt \ •�t, . �•', llerJ • 1t •It i 4.0 ♦ ,.•VeiMO�.•: :,..'! ♦r f Y•'Yl ••i ` J•• , / �•$O •Ya , i)•. ♦C9 [F rl iP v t• .1 Y F •t!, i •r,. .l .at r ,. .: S• L i . ♦,.,, `,.r ✓ ..1 Y L.. rh . aP Y t•'./af A• ta. !aJ // • f ► s A a a\„ .l,, r/ I J i 1 �'\ f� O s t a • •i S L• t E .\ e . '•Y A • a• l . ! • •aa ♦ i[, F. •••. • +f s f ;' f a\ :.�'��4 r 3 •, i • i i„ t t t i� < .” s• r I t t•''r`• " Rrd. s 6• .iw 1 1 .'i v s'' .1• / :'a , 't • 0 1 +� 9 l'a e t ! }. 2 7. '•t • �'i+ f' [ ,':: 1. Y s ° %:' =' t r •/ S. "r ,t f r J ♦ s � 1 r. 1 fl . of + - ,'••• •j • I 1 / a % ••. •+ r. t •2 • Y 1 t • ±' /! �:r':ti " 1 Y. • �• +' Y ., t - ....r* , i, 'M ` _/ . i ,[ r �” xa 1 • a M. i 1 -t. l ^" •"'•�'' `S }( :i f " '1. 1 'ter^^•• 1 1 Y'^''a + - • /!':1 1 ♦ a t 1 1 1 /(' •f / � / 9' • i• ! .1 :s 1 'r.• t •i .:�. :\. .":.�- •t t• r . .',V'- `.'e. „1 iF • 's r ••t',rr;"."►�; tr eF f •i iA. '!;�"+•.. L M' 1111'6 i, P/ l• ! / , [ • ♦•r��'e •t •, •'#' t, f•: • r i .:/'C t; ., •r. •i e I t t1. • } 1 rl. �d {1 r', •s• r••. 1 t! •', ' "1• r•• •,•'•' "h%.�,., i [ f t 1 ♦ 'a7 /• , !0 } -t•• Y t l' ''t:, t`t ! i�' i • Y ,” .. tli '? < .R f '1 .r 1. •[ ♦• • / •1. • I • i t 1 •S rl• , •� •` � ^Y • f. t a, .'J `,rr. •�:.• •.•i•r., ,••r�'r .'`.. ':'J r ' 't f •r /• / .t ,•tra•r •1It + t / •`C. r i ! .`�+ %i:'•' 1 . +3 %�••' •:� ``� L, if !, 1 / f n t ` • •♦ { 't /Jyy 1,' .[• . f � \- I I •' /.''•i,: .i - '• t 'x� ' \` ) • • `t, './ ! ^. i . r i I l/ l ! L ♦'• [ M fi t r " ♦ 1 I h /f' �• , 1 r• ♦ + t vJ(;'• , \ •. I J t' e•. •,I .!},•. ,h r �. '•/ .l i ♦ •a I s•ri [r „[ r t} t J 1• a•C r C, r t • x, • a• \ , a' •t. t I Itt :•r r 't : i � ♦• I I ,, r •f L /tr •'r [ a•• l `:is .' �, /. ' ,.,.: • . f v . 1 • .,, •'�1' /r l +., t ' l , p / ,f r . •a t - :I •, "\ • t- l. 1• r o1 [, t ••-• I .h, 1 ` J• .w' •[• /�' r /,,.. ,` r , t ' u f � •` 1. •.'r / Jr, , /•'r, 1• • • /4: • 3 h •.` f "`i' i r I I /••v r'.1+ .,•'•: d r 1 I •'\ 1/ '•1 • :r 11 r \' V r s '1 J J ! . ak' J ,+r { J H' ,t .t' h I • :W t ♦ a .V' � H , 'r l.•:: R n •.., f•. .rr :•' ,•• ,.. 1� • J'r' ,•.:::/ "' i r. /1• r 1•' S '�/! Ir r.`f i ./ r .J 11 J fl• .�1 [ I , i , I / .t [:. I a ► I .r•'. f ;ir 1 tl a J I `ti. 1 i r } J / J ' S [ h' , i•,, - 9 7 i •.r t ''�'' ;t •i'7 4'.+D / • / f 1 , • 1 •'+ I J `! 2, i s a,: ♦ n r `\ : "f. 'r • 1 i 4 L / •• :' /* ! , V ♦ r r } J J L t 1;w f • r isa ♦ I tes "• • r t 4 'F ) J ! 6• 1 •:/ i r f ! ' f t a• N ', v [ ♦ 'r f a.r i `.[ / '''; . t. '!t i 'ti - -' t -f. ! r / J '';. 1' t '.l 1. t. - h � 1 �!'•'' ... F •: •\:, /S s , , , +, . tt .t xr "r If ni` ,a . ['- 11 iAY 1 ►.! •.' tr •[.\ +.• ... /' ! ,l J•„ •, ' :•JS a: t �le • Is • d f,. 9 J. r • ,GI iif .. r .. lift •iL ' 4• • t W. ir:[ ��? -tr' ). 7i i , .itl [, , 91;i,1 ,e•,. l •', t, 2 111 ait rr ..4 r• `r3yi' 1 s f t 1•f •`� `.��,(�:04. i•• r r `:- . .�v 1•: _ . %S'.Y.iss a , rrf ; , i i it,,i,r ,.li %r,r. :33inir:f .tt. �a t •J. •t til ! t .t`,.r ..Slf k t 1, s ,t .tfilY r y r .wi 'i _ , :Ur: Itl ' .r• s; 1. 'r.x' �tiM1, .tt:,si ItOta� it ,• .6111 S /1 t •t1tt1 i'�!,,y / ff 5 t1t` h isl /t. .•. • )ti• •f ..'+,:;. r% • •1 /t • f: tl o-`I •' rY - � •1Yf. •! /f • 0 `i ii V' 1 r •'��:." ».• t\: v♦ . .r✓ i •I! \le• • 11 )t •.� +" l .IL 4 '•f.T ,• .:lir • O ♦a. /., tl :, ► .•,r\ -i + ; ,�t ., rr 71 `rA Y• •�1' • Y •• t N 1' .r: :.,• ,.�:•'V� <`': .s, •i 1 'I�t V' •rrf 4 ,t'rr .. C:, ' t, a,, iY. .rin,. a. ,rJ,err.s ;T -ali ..r "�� i V ♦ t1�r i t� �' { j•'• ! _ .i w e•'i'i rrfr,;; ' +) ; o sa• ,/•r t ,N, \) • ♦•' J•► t fl a ♦at J i r,. ;,,, «•• A •.t ♦ 6• !!: 'as• 'a a Rt t: � . ..) a' ;xi •a i a` tt• 4 'I •I ! 1 ♦ � 'tt !. ,x1 1 • ♦ ♦ • •Itt. - - �� rIr .v •11 a c_ ,r. , °'r':� : :r .• •l , r, a , r i r i• ♦ J4a • iw�i .� f{ t a . 6 ti` f 't a , r r.•y: 'p. ,t, :• t °�r °d. .J °t;" o ,:::,' a •r /•,c �;a, e •a a a� ii ! iti• t'•a ♦.•• 4 r. •.LY;,. :.ti • tl i ftr b .<I •t • q S t, i•: - P 6 �! .1• • a r Y t `V C.i' 1• d ••.• r�Y �tl� • 'IJ rN'•.. ,, Itt fa ♦ ♦ ►_ t} 1 ! t • : ht• • • tit. • � :/ :' ;V; . . e. V • f )' v Iry -! „f ,} R .'•. ) .d � :'�' 9 9. n .i • • 4 �• .,• s .at, '1 • / ! t, w:: • i i i< '\ •[ , • r t a � i n. .!� b ti_ !.. - •x ,C S � • ♦ $ � ♦ y ! 'f • • 4 � Y+ 1' •/. - i • F f fr h ♦ r • •`r Y 4 t . 11 f •l t '1 i 1 e r f !• I . t! J t • t f a; • r • t r > } t e, t 1 • f ,3, t le• ••e 1 a } • 1 ♦• c + ! t a t r ��' • • ice n t t ! - •• a t 1 �: • ' t t z f - t' at ✓ tt,1 L t5 ,• 7 x - •i a•T t •t.r ,] - 1 •t i •r '1 J f• i' i i a 7 t' i' r► w it .r rs' a •f at" 1 - M '.�>~L ^ .r'• e•• 1 •'1 1• •.• . to t: 4 `►' 1• ;c. - _ e, " i t .r 1. - ; ai • - • t•" •t • •.t [[ . •i 1 t S ' i t • t � 1 ( � � I 1' t ♦a� . .,,, •. i t 1: t " �i i. 1 s [tia• Jp'i `: r q!r t + ! s• �dt 1 •il 1 r v i'• , / t �. / t `V', -. • ,'!� t 4 i�t , •. q. ° 1 - t h. i. rl i i t t• I 1• f r ' 1` l �g ,! 1 Y :Z. ��• : 1 i r 'Y 1 A 1+• 'I ' � •t •�`'. 1. X111 y.� +!1 `� •t / J - • \• I r • .l. \k ' %l• f Y r \'• !/ � jj OY r sM •1 I I rY.< � / r iai.. \� l:.� `^Il .. •y �. .. P•' '�'w`„! 1 +i \ 7 14• / iw. '%•r.• - \♦ T / raa. :\ 1 ? G /: t::`' a•.. .y , ^. ..,,+.•' ... / ,�� a \ i, t ••.. `Z , . / _ . y /R . .,:�r� ♦ . !6�a• +•.a ♦ ',• // •rst" .''+ �. ��:• •/e•'•y�i•`,•',,:r iSh.:. �- it.?.:._.:. J .:.s.�.f��a.+iata►hi:: •,:..•.- .+ -vA.: +J A.: ,. d«,....:. s: ea..,.._... AAY �,.: .,... �:. atr...-'. �: 4A:: ..._:.,.5.2 w�i:-,_; AKG�i:° .:..iaL.t.s•.Aa�1i1L':'.:. - - °- alw: ila - - - - raY[.aYa.�'..: -+ . %i ".�» aw ,•}.l J, / a w' s.••• .+.•r...• «..r.+•wva�;.,� . • ,«„ w... �Je.• ,.a.r•:..r,.••.•�.a•..w.,c`r,.w �ovr+:..•� wwrP .,= i...,.+.. u•wnr' /!J /, ftM a Aa / +.'' °�• �'� •'• P•r . gYa t �r ?.� te r. r '7 't. :i `��iy ; .j r: • ,'1 ,^, •- , SiC "•�: ry+ ' 7 r i n.C• - 47 t ^" rr , t 1'"`t9 , r� ^'e•'P..'w'."<7 + 1 r �r s ✓ /r J •. i a, r 1 S� t •6 '1 'tvi rvi r, Y+• 4 i } t t # t# i < r t i 1 •t 1 1 ./ f 1 i f i t i t t i :� •! �1.� �, .�" ru /. r K r '' "� "' „ �, a ;c n ,t , ,/iii i�. ir.L'+�. +�,�• , r ir.t..i�i, , ►. � ! �A�' �. `��i(..i F � .Y.i.v. . \::.i . •::., Y::...�! , ,r. _ .i, ,L. .ti,,;_V .��,,. a �t rt�,x .e. 4. �1 r. ,. G G�I•riV Y�... .►. • 9 VA . � . s, .t . a7.. ri. Vii, ,iG`. +G+V .. . f �, t •. ..•moo'! r.tyj,. .: .._.»._- .- r..•._... ._._._ -_._ __.__..- ._..__. -... _. -. _.,__...._____ __..- _...- """._...•.. �......_.- __.....___- .- r.- .._._..... -...�- ...._.._.° •... � /r _�. C •L� /i•J, Ill C '� •• Vie! � `� 1a1 •t 9, yY �� l WHEREAS, Justa Ca r dinal was a resident of Maplewood since 1949; and WHEREAS, Justa Cardinal has lead a long and actively involved life and has touched many people; and WHEREAS, Justa Cardinal contributed time and energy to the community and various organizations to improve quality of 4fe; and WHEREAS, 1 die City of Maplewood appreciates her commitment to her community; and WHEREAS, Justa Cardinal will be greatly missed by those whom she has touched, and NOW ; THEREFORE BE IT RE S OL TEED, that I George Ros sbach, as Mayor and on behaffof the .Maplewood City Council, do hereb y thank Justa Cardinal for her unending energies which have contributed to our quality of life and recognize her for the joy that .she has brought, not only to Maplewood but to other communities and organizations that she worked with throughout the Twin Cities. Proclaimed this 24th day of A ugust, 1998 �o George ,Rossbach, Mayor .� +: `: •• v,te^ acv.. • i 1 ♦ • M1 ^, r S. r. .+ A' •,t.: L I' r. r '.i I R '.t• t + 'A' A f ',a.,c ! : A .'.. �,. .�, "- "'r""'•_ . '+ r.L• : - ��if ' Aof'o" jyi' 'i i' 1 ti +tiz- rri�:t�` :°i +7`i ,. t , „ i ►r .} ,t , [.t ^'+ . j�! f s ! .J..,f;, • t. i .'1t - r f _ 1.;,,., ti:; ,< +•3 .t"r:. s #, C f • 1�,1't�i #i' + t i%i' i tL1 + a:. t t. +;SeG4 + +:� .�t +;'S+ it�f,�e:1t; '!'Lil b >. == -,,,; ••.,� !� • / /, %� E•1 .._ . ,� a> r... �t.:;. �.:,:•:.:; �:<:>:::,.•„ r. ...•:ao,;.�;:.:;��:..:...,.Y..' _I . r•[.•... �:: 1..,"::.-.:,:.:>.•• .:a.::::w,...•r.::1r.:a.••»r.;: �.r;;..::,i::.;:.P,>- '1W,1.. .- t; v L' L!: c* �►t, LC G � • 'ri'' /t; `l,r: •rtJ, •r:- _:!a�v,* ^.rm.1 .•a•n•o.a•av+,•. -- --!• �;• �rY• r• wr+ isw,-' �.. s• rr. w•••^. �., y�.-•-•.•, mr.... ••;.•�.....- •,A;�.ta^y!= .rY_vn. ,.,.. %r «r. j ;`.,";ia•!1`C ^• iF�'• Diste /Y+L•".7r,1 •a• ' .J:J, 'y ♦\\. rr. :�'. - F,•Ri:,:� :.\� \...`�' ..�•�§ »'�- .r // °' 1� "' �/ • ' •i a _ ♦'S 'I /•y • -_ . {. 1! 1'?'F 1 ' \\, 1 t••t" 4 ! 'f / . ''.'/�'•G 'v i • � _ IS 1•'1 t t • �•. 1` !'• '•7 • t t 1 t l 1'. ,t f •' 1 t !, • I s' ! t ! f •e � 1 `•1 !• �!.`` •! .r of • v ! 1 1 1 F • ��L• t yy:. t 1. • s' (• F t .1 4 - J •1. t ' +e t r • +k t -- t 1 }• rl Y r r 3 i f '! • v a' f / a r r • a >. s' 4 •i t Jf • t t f 0'' t M a. Y •.. n t. •1 1 a t , 'i• I Vii: i• t t / x >< t h• - s •` t a � a .1 a - b 'o f • f a ♦ . R Y d- e r •r f . t . t c x 6 _ '�i. s48 t. fJt" •'j•C ♦ Masi `hC•' t1t r ,1- :>: ft 'ii. 1•r C Jr ^r,.♦;�� ' iot / 2• R♦. r! 1•!'1` 9 • 'a• \ •••' 'it• '�0'j • fit' •'* it >..ra t a f • �n •aRs•rr { }, aa•t'i x -. r +S' e.Slt :�,u ri. ,t 4 ,a �•."`;:; i• ! A % t. i) [�{: w Y' ! 'D• [. �' ii'= 'iitfl .•I�fai/ \ \ ••eL • �Illi: 'if: i:. ••A, FYl+ , •a•,;r iu.. :, .p` .'�It /r. r �r Y ",�J' �..i,ti \�. M r..,. .3. •„' it Plk•�7. ry r[, .,,1:,, .� •,�}�J • Qh • ♦, .1,tli ILlN •y id lo . 'r:1 �, I ! ,t.Jf. a.i��. _. � .Ittr ';4.J.ti ,±,s, •.f f. t;•' � le. ;o.,� a. ''t,,,j%rt' .r.. .d'' Qa ` r , L ira it37t ILr : • !.. ti . I •. t' 1 , ,. � _ 1, si rf, � I r 1N . « t tl• ,1 .Isis. ti, Y T {_ � " � t 7, tt: /: IS,[ ' a 1 i a f, � i ! r. �i• i.j 1 - ay�l'X+�,t:t• ..',,, ; - i' Itis •. 't\ .tr1,1 a ,rs p ��2 : �� 3 � % +t a !! i /7 1 '•;tL7 !rr L e , J `p o.,- ,..A�p.F '•�.'i�' f tl J I '• •:� i � et ,� ::t•i: `M.c° ^�•, 1 L : 't.'. R"6v/ : • {f`. ', !. Gi .,`It•�<•1-! it i�f t !' j � 0 1 • •� 4•,. :a•ii 1 :' [I r' \ M iii 1', ., t s e• ti; :J. � /'': _ J 1 �•, ;., t ° i r t •e; i� r' -, !!', ['a` j .!•t.: ti;' 's 1` a`,:•,itl � ••' "'N ;h .,•IG •. r'. s J '! I f5 ".7 � •: +it ;,'•l • w, r+ `tiC '► a +' ti7 i •. / 1 . ! i \ . .rYr e . :,J 1 .r }.. ,., i , '/ `�. .`�r1 - •t'i Iif •i I" I t / r. '� 4. e t ! i <• 4•• f I f • J 'L - �: I.• s J. ! t t 1 •• ..f r•/ '�'•. ':J ...♦ h J t, It i J J • i I+ f L I r Y 1 '',' 1 •i/ / / ' P f' t �� ' I I' � i \. r•I•I •• • Y• l I h t Y F' 1 '. �,. r . j i. / J ,tip ,• ♦ t. f .r 1 r...•.•' h ! �. 1 •ft .I• / t ♦ � •' t _ ' f t rl '/ Y •'t' •f f :J. f. •7 '•+' t .t" t' ,• • iJ4� ir • Q •�•♦ .>t f ♦ C /, • r{ 1 •tom' Y.r ',h. " t .I 1 1 ft 1• eta 1 •I •6r 1 •• ii •: tw:� C ,I..rl S .•�•+::N :• !• )e , •tif:y' .i 'i • ,r 'M \: } • °r `4 , 'i- .:s•'� =i. .�'i, ?,. .',J'+',.'•.i 1 fir! L• . t i tt t Mof a +`/ ,te t • e t f ./ rf 1♦A. E.. :� t '.2 +' :'/'` "r• 1i ! ..i i li S4 sat• 1,.. I' , li •• .•J i e 1 pi . f 1 M•.• 44 •e •sL •• t '!! • • t r ^' ••^ + , ! • a• , / J � f •• ! • may- • 1 `1 • t a' Y , • 1 i • t •e S t Q � ••' t L r ! t• r^ at• a t J ! r tt • r • '•t ♦I • 1 •• 11 rf 1 1 t' •' `C •r r t - i r L � r • • +J f • I• h Y ? C I • r M f \ i • { t r 1 • 'Ix • t• •J • Y•' .<r. r. \ :y 1 • 1 • a � ''[ i Y lr ! t v ' ♦ { " . 1 ` / • t ' "�v�+'•••dti � r • o • f • • ' ,1 1 II • ♦ /L J.. • . , \ as a I A t ,�/�'��' •. ' L sir i••r' .• • • - --. ir•i rr. •', - ,' ;``.' % °. .J,'., .-.. •r♦ • ". '!r` " •,•/ a °Mai `,•v. I/ i.,. pr• • •,' .••• _ f \,\` � tIL' f" � , `f - ,,;,i•./ •: :..•.a`.s*` '�.trr' , "'�:.:rC a'•s«:' . ✓ �' `, /�'� ./i ' : � �' ,i,' e t+; t !r � /! •f ; 2:. • ii i i f t , i ll l f ,.. .L. a•! ii - li / 1...•' J A • r a ii 1 r •' 1 .F t a Iw- ' r { t - 1• J J ♦ f t: v 1 •, a 1 i`t ♦ r i• .. / •r,t . X.. • . r J r ,v 1• '1• t� f h 1• \ \ , r I I ♦ r i l •• J• • • l [ r 1 1) 1 t• •a 1 r: •• t 1 • f 1 ! ••a ri 1 J 1 t11 � 1• i F ,l • ! ► a • t 4 1 1 1• ` �; !� Jy ��a :Ji;.,'�.�„� %��^,,h'�.�p••,, ,�.t, i j �:Sti,�' � �+ j�li. •'y;f � `; �. r MEMORANDUM Agenda Item I. TO: City Manager Action by Council: FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Gervais Court Senior Housing Endorse LOCATION: Gervais Court, south and east of Gervais Avenue Modified APPLICANT: Tri -Hess Development Company (David Hesley) Rejecte DATE: August 4, 1998 R INTRODUCTION Project Description Mr. David Hesley, representing Tri -Hess Development Company, is proposing to build 60 units of senior housing. He is proposing to build this project on a 3.4 -acre site on the north side of Gervais Court, south and east of Gervais Avenue. (See the location map on page 11 and the property line /zoning map on page 12.) The project would be a 3 -story apartment building with underground parking for 60 cars. There would. be 15 one - bedroom units, 21 one- bedroom units with dens and 24 two- bedroom units. The building also would have a library, card room, salon, general store, office, workout room, a multi- purpose room and solarium near the center of the building. There also would be a storm shelter in the garage area of the building. (See the maps on pages 15 - 22.) Requests To build the development, the applicant is requesting that the city approve the following: 1. A change in the city's land use plan. This change would be from LBC (limited business commercial) to RH (residential high density). (See the existing and proposed land use plan maps on pages 13 and 14.) 2. A zoning map change for the site. This change would be from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -3 (multiple - family residential). The applicant is requesting the zoning map change because the LBC zoning limits the uses to offices, clinics or day care centers and prohibits residential uses. (See the property line /zoning map on page 12.) 3. A reduction in the number of city code required parking spaces. Code requires two spaces for each unit or 120 spaces. The proposed site plan (page 15) shows a total of 92 parking spaces on the site. These include. 60 underground garage spaces and 32 uncovered spaces near the apartments. In addition, the plan also shows an area for 28 future parking spaces on the southeast corner of the site. 4. Design approval. DISCUSSION Land Use Plan Change This should be a good site for senior housing. It is across Gervais Avenue from the existing Carefree Cottages and Chateau senior housing development and next to a major collector street (Gervais Avenue). The site also is close to an arterial street (White Bear Avenue), two churches, a park and shopping. This site, however, is near existing businesses, including Rainbow Foods and Saints North Roller Rink, that could create disturbances for the residents. There is the potential for noise from the traffic and commercial activities from these locations that some people might object to living near. The developer should be aware of these existing conditions and should notify the potential tenants about these businesses. As proposed, the 60 units on the 3.4 -acre site means there would be 17.6 units per acre. However, with the underground parking, the proposed development gets a density credit as allowed in Section 36 -114 of the city code. With this credit, there would be 15.75 units per acre. This. is slightly lower than the maximum density standards in the comprehensive plan for apartment buildings with more than 50 units (16.3 units /acre). Zoning Map Change versus Planned Unit Development The applicant has applied for a zoning map change from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -3 (multiple dwelling residential). They are requesting the zoning map change because the LBC (limited business commercial) zoning limits the uses to offices, clinics and day care centers. As an alternative to the zoning map change, the city could approve a conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) for the 60 -unit senior citizen housing development. An advantage in approving a PUD is that the city then can approve a specific site plan and specific land uses. If the city approves the requested zoning map change, the developer could build a variety of multiple family residential housing on the site. This includes townhouses, condominiums and family apartments. Reduced Parking Spaces As proposed, the number of parking spaces should be adequate for a senior housing development. The ratio of spaces to units is similar to the Village on Woodlynn senior project (the former Cottages of Maplewood), the Carefree Cottages on Gervais Avenue and Cardinal Pointe. Multiple dwellings limited to seniors usually have fewer cars per unit than multiple dwellings that are not restricted to seniors. The city has recognized this by approving other senior housing projects with fewer parking spaces. (See the list on page 8.) Design Approval Building Design and Exterior Materials The proposed building should be attractive. It would have an exterior of brick and horizontal vinyl siding with brick accents on the building corners and the roof would have asphalt shingles. (See the drawings on page 48 and in the project plans.) The building would have three stories above grade and an underground parking area. Because of the proposed building location with streets on three sides, the city should ensure that all sides of the building have the same appearance. In addition, the proposed plans do not show or list the colors of the building. As such, the color scheme should be submitted to city staff for approval before the city issues the building permit. Landscaping The proposed plans remove most of the existing trees on the site. The city should require the developer to preserve as much of the existing vegetation near the east -side property line as possible. As proposed,. the developer would plant at least 86 trees including black hills spruce, Austrian pine, ash, Oaks and maples on the 3.4 -acre site. The proposed plans, however, show 24 of the larger new trees in the existing utility easement on the east side of the site. The city should require the developer to plant these large trees within five feet of the east property line. This is to ensure that the new trees would not interfere with the existing sewer pipes near the center of the easement. The city also may want to have the developer create more screening along the south edge of the site. This could be done with a berm and additional plantings to help buffer the effects of the businesses and traffic from the proposed building. O 28, 1998, the community design review board (CDRB) recommended approval of the design plans for this proposal. On August 3, 1998, the planning commission made several recommendations of this project. These included approval of the land use plan change., a conditional use permit fora planned unit development and the proposed parking reduction authorization. The commission also .recommended that the city not approve the proposed zoning map change since they were recommending approval of the PUD. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approve the resolution on page 27. This resolution changes the land use plan from LBC _(limited business commercial) to RH (residential high density) for the 3.4 -acre site of the Gervais Court senior housing development. The city bases this change on the following findings: 1. This site is proper for and consistent with the city's policies for high - density residential use.. This includes: a. Expanding the transitional land use between the existing residential and commercial land uses. b. It is next to a collector street, is across Gervais Avenue from existing senior housing and is near two churches, shopping, an arterial street and a park. 2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values. b. There would be no traffic from this development on existing residential streets. B. Approve the resolution starting on page 28. This resolution is for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the Gervais Court senior housing development. The city bases this approval on the findings required by code. (Refer to the resolution for the specific findings.) Approval is subject to the following conditions: 3 1. All construction shall follow the plans date- stamped June 25, 1998. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The owner shall not convert this development to non- seniors housing without the revision of the planned unit development. For this permit, the city defines seniors housing as a residence occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older. 4. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. 5. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day -to -day transportation on site. If the city decides there are excess parking spaces available on site, then the city may allow the parking of these on site. 6. If the city council decides there is not enough on -site parking after the building is 95 percent occupied, the city may require additional parking. 7. The developer shall provide an on -site storm shelter in the apartment building. This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the director of emergency preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population. 8. The city council shall review this permit in one year. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or a building permit. C. Deny the proposed zoning map change for the proposed Gervais Court senior housing development. This change would have been from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -3 (multiple - family residential). The city is not making this change because the city approved a conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) for the proposal. D. Approve 92 parking spaces (60 garage spaces and 32 open spaces), rather than the 120 spaces required by code for the Gervais Court senior housing project, because: 1. The parking space requirement is not proper for senior housing, because there are fewer cars per unit in these projects. 2. The city has approved fewer parking spaces for other senior housing, including the Village on Woodlynn, the Carefree Cottages and Cardinal Pointe. E. Approve the plans date - stamped June 25, 1998 (site plan, landscape plan, grading and drainage plans and building elevations) for the Gervais Court senior housing development. The city bases this approval on the findings required by the code. The developer or contractor shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit: 4 a.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, sidewalk and driveway and parking lot plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: (1) The erosion control plan shall be consistent with city code. (2) The grading plan shall: (a) Include building, floor elevation and contour information. (b) Include contour information for the land that the construction will disturb. (c) Show sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city engineer. (3) The entryway and driveway in front of the building shall meet the minimum standards for turning and access for firefighting equipment. (4) All the parking areas and driveways shall have continuous concrete curb and gutter except where the city engineer decides that it is not needed for drainage purposes. b. Submit a lawn- irrigation plan to staff showing the location of sprinkler heads. c. Submit a certificate of survey for all new construction. d. Revise the landscape plan for city staff approval showing: (1) That all .proposed trees would be consistent with city standards for size, location and species. (2) The 24 proposed large trees in the utility easement moved to within five feet of the east property line. (3) A berm and additional trees along the south side of the site near Gervais Court, subject to city staff approval. This is to provide additional screening and buffering from the businesses to the south of the site. (4) As much of the existing vegetation along the eastern property line preserved as possible. e. The fire chief shall approve the access to the building for firefighting needs. f. Submit elevations to the city for staff approval showing colors and materials for all sides of the building. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction. b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. 9 c. Install reflectorized stop signs at the exit, a handicap- parking sign. for each handicap - parking space and an address on the building. In addition, the applicant shall install stop signs and traffic directional signs within the site, as required by staff. d. Paint any roof -top mechanical equipment to match the uppermost part of the building. Screen all roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property. (code requirement) e. Construct trash dumpster and recycling enclosures as city code requires for any dumpsters or storage containers that the owner or building manager would keep outside the building. Any such enclosures must match the materials and colors of the building. f. Install and maintain an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas. g. Install continuous concrete curb and gutter along all interior driveways and around all open parking stalls. h. Install a storm shelter in a central location in the apartment building. This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the Maplewood director of emergency preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population. Install on -site lighting for security and visibility, subject to city staff approval. j. The developer or contractor shall: (1) Complete all grading for the site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. (2)* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. (3) Remove any debris or junk from the site. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5. This approval does not include the signs. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Ce CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the 16 property owners within 350 feet of the site about the proposal. Of the four responses, two were for the project, one was for the project with comments, one was conditionally for the project. For 1. More nice neighbors in our. community. A good use for the land. (Anonymous) 2. My concern. is that with all of our activity (outdoor Concerts, youth activities, etc.), our new neighbors might have reason to complain. We have a great relationship with the cottages and hope that it would continue with this new project. (Pastor Mike Smith Redeeming Love Church - 2425 White Bear Avenue) Conditionally For I am Conditionally for this proposal with the following conditions: 1. This change in zoning must not allow future changes to my M -1 zoning. 2. I, or future owners of my property, must be free to develop our property as we wish within the M -1 zoning. 3. If any depreciation in land value occurs as a result of this proposed zoning change to allow this housing, the City of Maplewood will compensate me or future owners for any loss incurred. (Dick Hegrenes, owner of 1790 Gervais Court) Also see the letter on page 26 for additional comments. 7 REFERENCE Site Description The site is undeveloped. .Surrounding Land Uses North and west: Carefree Cottages and Chateau across Gervais Avenue. East: Redeeming Love Church. South: Existing businesses including Cooks Auto Repair, amini- storage facility and Saints North roller rink across Gervais Court. Reasons for the Requests This proposal needs a land use plan change because: 1. State law does not allow a city to adopt any regulation that conflicts with its comprehensive plan. 2. One of the findings required by code for a CUP is that the use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan. The land use plan shows this site for LBC uses, which do not include multiple - family housing. The developer has applied for a zoning map change because the zoning on this site is LBC (limited business commercial). The LBC zone allows offices, clinics and day care centers and not residential uses. A rezoning to R -3 (multiple dwelling residential) would allow a variety of multiple - dwelling uses and plans. However, a CUP for a PUD specifies the uses and is for a specific site plan. Past Actions - Parking and Garages The city has approved reduced parking and garage requirements for all past senior housing. This includes the following: 1. Concordia Arms: 100 spaces for 124 units or .8 spaces per unit. 2. Hazel Ridge: 75 spaces for 75 units or 1 space per unit. 3. Casey Lake (Harmony School site -never built): 62 spaces for 62 units or 1 space per unit. 4. Village on Woodlynn .(former Cottages of Maplewood): 87 spaces for 60 units or 1.5 spaces for each unit. 5. Carefree Cottages: 132 spaces for 108 units or 1.22 spaces for each unit. 6. Cardinal Pointe: 149 spaces for 108 units or 1.38 spaces for each unit. Planning Considerations Existing Land Use Plan Designation - LBC (limited business commercial) Proposed Land Use Plan Designation - RH (residential high density) CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL There are no specific criteria for a land use plan change. Any land use plan change should be consistent with the goals and policies in the city's comprehensive plan. The resolution starting on page 28 gives the findings required by code for approval of a conditional use permit. Section 36-485 of the city code has the criteria for approving a zone change. Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, Orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. HOUSING POLICIES The land use plan has eleven general land use goals. Of these, three apply to this proposal. They are: minimize land planned for streets, minimize conflicts between land uses and provide many housing types. The land use plan also has several general development and residential development policies that relate to this project. They are: - Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic, social or physical impact on adjoining developments. - Include a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic, racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should include apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single - family housing, public- assisted housing and low- to moderate- income housing, and rental and Owner - occupied housing. - Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. The housing plan also has policies about housing diversity and quality that the city should consider with this development. They are: 9 - Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the city. These are to meet the life - cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs and _nontraditional households. - The city will continue to provide dispersed locations fora diversity of housing styles, types and price ranges through its land use plan. The city's long -term stability of its tax base depends upon its ability to attract and keep residents of all ages. To do so, the city must insure that a diverse mix of housing styles is available in each stage of the life cycle of housing needs. kr /p: Sec 11 /gervisct. mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Existing Land Use Plan Map 4. Proposed Land Use Plan Map 5. Site Plan 6: Proposed Grading Plan 7. Proposed Landscape Plan 8. Building elevations 9. Unit Floor Plans (4 pages) 10. Developer's statement dated June 8, 1998 11. Letter from Saints North dated July 2, 1998 12. Resolution: Land Use Plan Change 13. Resolution: Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development 14. Project Plans date- stamped June 25, 1998 (Separate Attachment) 10 Attachment 1 o RADATZ car: AVE. 3E5SA6 AV W W Ma rkham o tai Pond RAMSEY o COUNTY NORTH SA v COURT N AVE. 'Z U y . � w KOHL.MAN Casey North cs z W o AVE cv Lake W N C a� g El ' 0 w z R Cl W 2 W EDGEHILL RD. 0 v DEMONT AVE. m N�►�st BROOKS BROOKS AVE. cn � � Q.. o LGERVAIS z AVE. = EL � ry EX TANT AVE. a wo �A AVE. } W .•:••.•.•. S 0 cg G RAN DVI EW AVE. z CT. � Y o'� VIKING DR. SHERREN AVE. O K;V c�e ad Lake CASTLE AVE. �� COPE -` ' =-�� AVE. COPE AVE. Pg� .w v ►= LARK o AV 4 ' �' AVE. Q E � F.- � °' Z LAURIE RD. V LAURIE RD. � 4 +-' £ W Z shonv wd o LAURIE RD. w 0 � cn W z W o 1 700 -- SAND URST AVE, ca. o U Z W U C� Z z N B v Y CO. RD. > Q E. m 6URKE AVE. ® BURKE AVE. Confer o 0 ELDR IDGE AVE. 3 John S BELMONT AVE. �ewo city Hoa SKILL MAN AVE. HARRIS AVE. ., W ROSEWOOD AVE. N. J ROSEWOOID R AN AV. kQ� AVE. S. RAMSEY COUNTY Q Jam' Q,P� NURSING HOME AND NORTH FAIR GROUNDS v z W g AVE. ALDRICH GOODRICH , HOLLOWAY W $ _ �:I GOLF n LOCATION MAP 11 4 N OOv L YD+A a a x it ` a. -- 1. SUMMIT �,,, (A CT. 2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR. S? �? g W �°,� �` m �� P LO to► T S ANDRIDG 3. DULUTH CT. 4. LYDIA AVE. ✓p Y Vp cn S 0 o Q Z MAPLE U. BEAM AVE. 6EAMr,� 4 AVE. [Q MAPLE VIEW AVE. V o RADATZ car: AVE. 3E5SA6 AV W W Ma rkham o tai Pond RAMSEY o COUNTY NORTH SA v COURT N AVE. 'Z U y . � w KOHL.MAN Casey North cs z W o AVE cv Lake W N C a� g El ' 0 w z R Cl W 2 W EDGEHILL RD. 0 v DEMONT AVE. m N�►�st BROOKS BROOKS AVE. cn � � Q.. o LGERVAIS z AVE. = EL � ry EX TANT AVE. a wo �A AVE. } W .•:••.•.•. S 0 cg G RAN DVI EW AVE. z CT. � Y o'� VIKING DR. SHERREN AVE. O K;V c�e ad Lake CASTLE AVE. �� COPE -` ' =-�� AVE. COPE AVE. Pg� .w v ►= LARK o AV 4 ' �' AVE. Q E � F.- � °' Z LAURIE RD. V LAURIE RD. � 4 +-' £ W Z shonv wd o LAURIE RD. w 0 � cn W z W o 1 700 -- SAND URST AVE, ca. o U Z W U C� Z z N B v Y CO. RD. > Q E. m 6URKE AVE. ® BURKE AVE. Confer o 0 ELDR IDGE AVE. 3 John S BELMONT AVE. �ewo city Hoa SKILL MAN AVE. HARRIS AVE. ., W ROSEWOOD AVE. N. J ROSEWOOID R AN AV. kQ� AVE. S. RAMSEY COUNTY Q Jam' Q,P� NURSING HOME AND NORTH FAIR GROUNDS v z W g AVE. ALDRICH GOODRICH , HOLLOWAY W $ _ �:I GOLF n LOCATION MAP 11 4 N Attachment 2 w "r coo W E T + r ii L.3 Z I ' _ 2 .15 ■_ : :•r��, . 1 ► ' 205. !" 75 at 4s ;�. ,s r- a s �:- r D.4 .72oti W _ , > K (7_) 7 • c ( 4 o (42) o N w I , _ 9d ac •v 11<�.4. 1;1 w IS4.01' 1.0 r w �t ,i � ! j 1 026 XO I 1 r Q �S f•. ON 0 is .t�st'A J ise • - ..:� �;_ ., 12.7 .E _ s.,• �S 1 W Ic / IWO � ,'�•, � � T.t sss,�es � j LLI 2 C04, Q { r. ''- \ ' •• lt.a3ot. �I 91�E 4 � � N• TCC� � ; r �(/ c.�2 , 't = 1.6 L t BC 'p I �,0,__ ...� *,. f%) RAINBOW FOODS. t2 Rl ��, P° 11c� X BC '' (roe) � • � • I • •T" /. 230 . :1 � 4ili s) CAREFREE COTTAGES � 4 y g37) P 9 �, ) v, `- - v ,,�� t GERVAIS AVENUE _ US) C53) f�.iw� -5U .�; D � ' �� — — i.a - 1 �'�t } � 5.34 w - 1 t04.OL 1 I � ko T a T(24) ' o ss 310 P 14 A-11 c V1 A � � � �` ; s - Jai • O L B C P Q (21) t� ■ A t r �1 Q O 0: 13 5 3(2c) (4 ( ( 7 �� 2425 2 ' 8 s `) 1 - N o L B C 173 �- Ztl., SITE LL 135-6 1 O� s� 8 �P it CI e) Ail J3+1.`s I t lot' -- - .]131 . _ °e as • MMry .3V - - GERVA I S AVENUE - -- s _ a GERVAIS COURT - '-' '0434. — �- - •s st�.as )01.63' ;31 s' *� I , 112.0 Zii•JtS 10 0.17 5 , s.,a ♦ S e 4 25 at • 1 t � S R. N g� US WEST ♦ 1 olo N ■ ♦ ti e .' ' S 1 sI I • , ca (5' :° ki A z a I ♦ Q' 4; PETSMART ( PER vi ? Q LBC ♦♦ Q � r: TOP Ie s k, p' i ! N • %r 0* «, OFFICE WAREHOUSE ,, ��y��y ♦ ro . ,e WORLD 1, of � ♦ : - - - - d'i ' 0 o r' J_► I ■ \ 14 - -- - -- - -- --- - - - - -- - - - -- ■ f • - - - - - - - N: N _ 1 321.1 - - ♦ ■ ■■ ■�■■■ ■� s HIGHWAY 36 ■ � � I k NwY T T.f.•41o212 • NWi' ' - - - - - - - - - 3sat H. T i 6 _ . t -- - -- -' - -- p Go - (/� _- ,� -.... ' ... _ _ �9r _ o - -- f . ♦ �, ��a 8 ,J : I « ISO ws , •6 w 3 a4 ac 1. O st 2.74 at ~ _ ♦ !+ • ' 16 17 1! 20 1 22 UO at •_ t'� • 0 f - - `� t - - - - '�' - t` ..o n e 3 (16 o (IZ) (13 (14 L. t9.... . ♦ t t AG z ♦_ I . I b a+c . ; J ,So o (�) • a 7 6 s 4 3 Z 1e ,rs 14 12 II 10 9 bra 4j. . •1 1 Q 014 qq ( 013 c - - 1 10, . 2 / J os - - - _ vKnTED PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 12 4 N Attachment 3 on U. 0 IL M -1 dw • w� C) 75 J! BC �` o ma collector NA A PLE WrW',C- -------- Ll JJ gC CO E v e 5eam. i M )r ial 0 ' BC (M L BC(M) R,21 [B R-1 s -LBC M.1 R-3 (M) 0 D 503 M /Z R /3(H .._JW� 'v ' Wes- �� I ' _- ''" mom L Osey C A-N IL Lohe rna C L-4. a i 0! r collect b c 11 t r FR, R JR.• is FS 1-2 0 Ci p C Os Os ! 7-a= doM. -BC R,-3' LBC p All P R — -N H ) 0.8 Ctor - �"Ar va R M IBC BC G I Ar arterial Highwa 36 ----. �-T �- interchan 01 C Cn Cz LAND USE MAP 3. SITE (EXISTING) 4 113 Attacnment 4 M 0 ■ W o �� ------- _i;� ma collector 7 BC ■■■■■■■ict • mm�lmqumm ■O�no MAKEYVOCC) MALL � gC 0 Co E _ j ve,__ - ial B� L t B (M) _ R_ 2 B R -`1 C oS A LBC 9-3(M) m 1 0 3(H i R - 1. C ose Awl c Kp_ AN IL A-1- p rna Co ri r collqct c I t r 4W 01 It o s Os IL BC L LE3c , 1 _44 1 R. R — � R2 H tor- c - �.46ca BC( 1 18C gc �n) • �--._ _ _. �... , IVY ; G :� AW in arterial rol Highwa 36 �-, T _,"A Let. m /i ntOrrcha g e COpt A E W Q Q) W 0 tb L) 0 co E LAND USE MAP SITE (PROPOSED) 4 14 Attachment 5 SITE DATA arts assA' 3.402 AMRS let, iT2 ss 2 16p1110 OO"M"R 1l,ITr !! 12.!11 taRRMW a>I1>o maim 17.245 W 11.69% MALES AM PATIOS 4 w 2.•!a IN aiia 107, 250•W 72."% V"aL 93 V QITt "WrOSM i0 UNITS Ors =Ono" WITS s 15 i 0 an son"OM WM bu UNITS a 21 !!0 =00= =ITS • 24 101ML !ARK=MC SWAGS PlOtOWW 92 i"Qii � 1M=M A M0 ZPACBS = 60 >uhCS grac s w 32 WMAA.- (seNrt"t rarkiaq AM* I available ea Site for o ' dF 2S aiiitioaa2 SPaves) . •� � '�j. . a M�.iws A • (v. -A, i ' 4 �t F " . ' -" %p a _ .r �vlf•4L L.NG - jp - _. .. . i i tr'eA1M $ CgMT PROPOSED SITE PLAN (,e. on#.,#t - . tHws T I t 9rW �Lf� �. egw.&.. O+J 'i �. �y�v s4. .- 2. so "460 SITE PLAN 15 F11 s i 4 N Attachment 6 GERVAIS COURT . ft "aft •r r" of law' art off M&r TRENCH DRAIN CROSS— SECTION 0 vile PT s 3w Wit. •M. /11N ` Q O r1. 7 Mr MAN �' R ►M1 M� VRRr 1 OIII� QAi� w �1� Q VAB couptT �� MI�M11 @WALL q�Ai1pLJT *W LL WN M INTO calm PROPOSED GRADING PLAN b• 25 16 4 N co 4-) a cl) L) (0 4-) -SOUTHEAST. ELEVATION rN r M R NCO .0 :0 o l P.10 i I 10.051 NORTHWEST ELEVATIOR Attachment 9 LEVEL (PARKING) FLOOR PLAN • - t : :Mr -'-• ...sue:: _ ._... M 4 N 19 Y F . N + ' v �y r• a :NOS fLi001i �lJIN E GERMS COURT _ - .. AwGMtT�cts • 743 RADIO DRIVE - swTt Its •009A1iRx, rINNEiOTA $4125 MAPLEW000, IMMMIS A, I to s ss -44 LEVEL (PARKING) FLOOR PLAN • - t : :Mr -'-• ...sue:: _ ._... M 4 N 19 410 4f cf "• ti . F . "T9 GERVAIS COURT Q _ _ ARCNITtCT, 703 RADIO DRIVE • SUITE 1/g WOOOSURT. IIIIINEiOTA gtt!• !lIS4. YAPLEWOW,SONNES0iA FIRST ..ElO 4 N 20 J 2 ftAOA PLAM '"""°" a►TE GERVAIS COURTo a►wa��•scTS 783 RADIO DRIVE - SUITE 1111 MOOOOI/Rt.. MINNESOTA ittlil MAPLEV XW,100MOTA (st!) sss•��st SECOND ' AND TfM FLOOR PLANS • • 111 tIL M 4 N 21 I ,i '; sE f �'� wit � � � ', • r r - ,� • � � .1 saacax+t' ! �e7Rov.� 4l' Ot+1 . ri •tX+l �tls ...• ywtT+� ON Itrs f.l w+tT'� ! .�t7�o!1 ti1� .D�� .• . � Wi�1+51 tl W►�Y'7 • t (iµORi>IS�1 11 � D�+� 4 t�l 119 1 b w� f'� uN 1137 'ToTh .- L*4" (,o t>aRA, ftAOA PLAM '"""°" a►TE GERVAIS COURTo a►wa��•scTS 783 RADIO DRIVE - SUITE 1111 MOOOOI/Rt.. MINNESOTA ittlil MAPLEV XW,100MOTA (st!) sss•��st SECOND ' AND TfM FLOOR PLANS • • 111 tIL M 4 N 21 s A 1 i I :1 TWO BEDROOM TYPE A. .962 SF. ...T.WO.REDR.00M.TYPE B 972 .SF.. ONE DEDROOWDEN. 906 - SF _ONE.BW-RO -OM .....- ....__...79.4.. SF. I I t s A 1 i I :1 TWO BEDROOM TYPE A. .962 SF. ...T.WO.REDR.00M.TYPE B 972 .SF.. ONE DEDROOWDEN. 906 - SF _ONE.BW-RO -OM .....- ....__...79.4.. SF. Attachment 10 r Direct: 779 -2651 Main: 770 -1775 Fax: 779 -2628 BRUCE MOGREN Edina Realty 2966 White Bear Avenue Maplewood,, MN 55109 June 8, 1998 To: City of Maplewood Planning Department RE: Developers response to item #2 of the rezoning application Question "a ": How would this zoning change promote the public welfare? I . Reducing 'Traffic Congestion? This project involves an apartment building for senior citizens 55 years of age and older. The *ect pro itself would producLO only moderate traffic throughout the day and there would be no direct access onto Gervais Avenue. All traffic would enter and exit on Gervais Court which, should not disturb the traffic flow of the area. In our opinion the issue of the traffic congestion is not significant. _ 2. Improving Safety from fire and other dangers? The manner in which the apartment building is situated on the site should provide for adequate access for safety from fire and other dangers plus the building itself will contain a sprinkler system to protect against fires. 23 3. Providing adequate light and open space? The building will have a significant amount of security lighting for the senior citizen residents plus the site design has allowed for more than adequate open space. There has been a concerted effort to locate the open space for optimum viewing and use by the residents. 4. Avoiding overcrowding? This project will have the same density as the Carefree Cottages and Chateau located directly across the street. There have not been - any overcrowding issues with the Carefree community and we do not expect to encounter any overcrowding problems with this project. The fact that this project has underground parking should actually give the project the appearance of very little congestion to the neighboring properties. 5. Conserving property values? This area is primarily a commercial area. The landscaping and building structures and maintenance procedures will be very similar to the Carefree Cottages and Chateau and as such will in Is our opinion, actually enhance the value of the neighboring properties. Question "b ": Why would this zoning change not injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood? The neighboring properties are all commercial in nature and the fact that this is going to be an upscale market rate rental property should not injure or detract from the use of neighboring properties. There are 248 senior citizen rental units located just across the street from. this. The neighborhood is already senior citizen in character and this project will fit right in. 24 Question "c ": Are there adequate public facilities, such as streets, sewers, water lines, schools and parks? There are already streets, sewer and water lines in place. There are churches and parks nearby and these senior citizens will be less than one mile away from the Maplewood Community Center. 25 July 2, 1998 150 EATON STREET • SAINT PAUL, MN 55107. 612/224 -3369 Mr. Kenneth Roberts Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 5109 Dear Sir. E i Atta 11 ° Ints Roller Skating Centers As per our telephone conversation of today, and as per your written request, we, as partners in the H & B Partnership and owners of Saints North Roller Skating Center submit the following: 1. We received your neighborhood survey, dated June 30, 1998 regarding the rezoning of the property on Gervais court for use as senior apartments. The property is located across Gervais Court street immediately north of our Saints North Roller Skating Center. 2. We are in no way opposed to senior housing. 3. We do want to goon record that we are a recreational facility that has operated in the city of Maplewood for over 20 years. Most of our customers are young, 6 to 16, and include most of The areas school, churches, scouts, etc. We are open 7 days and several nights a week. Most of the nights we close at 12 midnight. A crowd of 300 and the automobiles of the parents .picking up their children will generate a certain amount of noise and light from the cars. This has been an acceptable mode of operation for over 20 years and has always been within our zoning rights. 4. We would obviously be very much opposed to rezoning and new housing if it curtails or puts an economic hardship on our business which is already in operation. 5.. We want the above to go on record with the seller, the developer, the renters and the city of Maplewood. Thank you for allowing us to express our concerns. Regards, ,b/4 Allen Hofineister Peter D. Boo. 770 -3849 224 -3369 26 Attachment 12 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, David Hesley, representing Tri -Hess Development Company, applied for a change to the city's land use plan. This change is from LBC (limited business commercial) to RH (residential high density). WHEREAS, this change applies to the 3.4 -acre undeveloped property located between Gervais Avenue and Gervais Court west of White Bear Avenue. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On August 3, 1998, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the proposed plan amendment. 20 On August 24, 1998, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described changes for the following reasons: 1. This site is proper for and consistent with the city's policies for high - density residential use. This includes: a. Expanding the transitional land use between the existing residential and commercial land uses. b. It is next to a collector street, is across Gervais Avenue from existing senior housing and is near two churches, shopping, an arterial street and a park. 2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values. b. There would be no traffic from this development on existing residential streets. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1998. 27 Attachment 13 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development proposed a conditional use permit (CUP) for the Gervais Court senior housing planned unit development (PUD). WHEREAS, this permit applies to the 3.4 -acre undeveloped property between Gervais Avenue and Gervais Court west of White Bear Avenue. The legal description is: Lot, 1, Block 2, Maple Ridge Mall Addition in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On August 3, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On August 24, 1998, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of Operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration,. general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans date - stamped June 25, 1998. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The owner shall not convert this development to non- seniors housing without the revision of the planned unit development. For this permit, the city defines seniors housing as a residence occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older. 4. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. . 5. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day -to -day transportation on site. If the city decides there: are excess parking spaces available on site, then the city may allow the parking of these on site. 6. If the city council decides there is not enough on -site parking after the building is 95 percent occupied, the city may require additional parking. 7. The developer shall provide an on -site storm shelter in the apartment building. This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Emergency Preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population. 8. The city council shall review this permit in one year. "The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or a building permit. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1998. 29 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA AUGUST 3, 1998 V. PUBLIC HEARING Gervais Court Senior Housing —Land Use Plan Change (LE3C to RH), Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Zoning Map Change ( LBC to R -3), and Parking Reduction Authorization Ken Roberts. associate planner. presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts noted that the owner is askin the city to change the definition of senior housing, for this permit, to a residence occupied by at g Y least one p erson 55 years of age or older. The city has no problem changing this, as long as the applicant can meet financing and federal housing standards. He said no financing through the city is being requested. Commissioner Frost was concerned that the large. amount of traffic at Saints North about midnight right be a problem. He fe!t it was important that the developer and potential residents were aware of this. Commissioner Thompson asked about the requirement for a marketing study. Chairperson Fischer said., because city financing was not being reauested. this rea:t'rer' er' d`d nct ao'.a Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 08 -03 -98 Commissioner Tri ler sug gested moving the senior- housing entrance to the west to alleviate some of PP g9 the P otential traffic congestion and cut down on headlight glare. Mr. Roberts said the present driveway lay out was an effort to facilitate emergency vehicle access to the project. He thought the downhill grade to the underground parking also might be affected. Ken Haider, city engineer, commented that on Gervais Court there is a cul -de -sac with very little street traffic. He said most of the traffic is generated at the driveways. David Hesley', the applicant, and Bruce Mogren. who is working with Mr. Hesley on this project, were present at the meeting. Mr. Hesley described the proposed building. He did not anticipate a problem g with the headlights from Saints North because the first floor of the project will be "m uch higher than car level." Mr. Hesley said that 55 years of age and older was an important issue because there is an "extreme need" for market -rate housing for the age group from 55 to 62. The applicant had no problem with this 1 ro'ect being designated as a planned unit development. Commissioner Trippler questioned P whether the solarium and other amenities being provided were of adequate size. Hesley said that 70 percent of this site is green space and should provide plenty of exercise area. Peter Boo, the founder of Saints North, and Al Hofineister, the managing partner, were both present. Mr. Boo emphasized that the owners and residents of this proposed project should be aware of the existence of this roller rink. Mr. Boo asked that the record show they are at this location. and "living within the law." He said they are not opposed to senior housing at this location. He stressed that Saints North generates a large amount of traffic day and night. There were no comments from the audience so the public hearing portion was closed. Commissioner Thompson 9 son thou ht the berm, foliage, and trees to "minimize the impact" from Saints North should be stressed. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Approval of the resolution which changes the land use plan from LBC (limited business commercial) to RH (residential high density) for the 3.4 -acre site of the Gervais Court senior housing development. The city bases this change on the following findings: 1. This site is proper for and consistent with the city's policies for high- density residential use. This includes: a. Expanding the transitional land use between the existing residential and commercial land P g uses. b. It is next to a collector street, is across Gervais Avenue from existing senior housing and is near two churches, shopping, an arterial street and a park. 2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values. b. There would be no traffic from this development on existing residential streets. Approval of the resolution which is for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for B. PP � approval on the finding the Gervais Court senor housing development. The city bases this appro s g required code. (Refer uired b to the resolution for the specific findings.) Approval is subject to the following conditions: Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 08 -03 -98 1. All construction shall follow the p lans date- stamped June 25, 1998. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The ro osed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval P p or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The owner shall not convert this development to non - seniors housing without the revision of the lanned unit development. For this permit, the city defines seniors housing as a p p residence occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older. 4. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. 5 p Residents shall not ark trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day -to -day p trans ortation on site. If the city decides there are excess parking spaces available on site, then the city may allow the parking of these on site. 6. If the City council decides there is not enough on -site parking after the building is 95 percent occupied, the city may require additional parking. 7. The developer shall provide an on -site storm shelter in the apartment building. This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the director of emergency preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population. 8. The city council shall review this permit in one year. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or a building permit. C. Denial of the proposed zoning map change for the proposed Gervais Court senior housing development. This change would have been from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -3 (multiple - family residential). The city is not making this change because the city approved a conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) for the proposal. D. Approval of 92 parking spaces (60 garage spaces and 32 open spaces), rather than the 120 spaces required by code for the Gervais Court senior housing project, because: 1. The P arking space requirement is not proper for senior housing, because there are fewer cars per unit in these projects. 2. The city has approved fewer parking spaces for other senior housing, including the Village on Woodlynn, the Carefree Cottages and Cardinal Pointe. Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Commissioner Rossbach was concerned that the comments offered by Mr. Boo of Saints North would be contained in the minutes of this meeting. Mr. Roberts specifically asked that these remarks be included. He also noted that a letter from Saints North that outlined their concerns was included in the report and would be sent to the council. Ayes —all The motion passed. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA .DULY 28 1998 B. Gervais Court Apartments, Gervais Court - Tri Hess Development Company Mr. Dick Krumm, of RVK Architects, the architect for this project, and Mr. David Hesley, representing Tri -Hess Development Company, the applicant, were present. Mr. Krumm said he had brought drawings with him showing the color schemes. Mr. Krumm said that there will be no trash enclosure, that all trash will be enclosed within the underground parking garage, as well as building storage and maintenance. Mr. Krumm said they had no issue with any of the points that were raised in the staff report. Mr. Krumm said that, relative to the landscape plan, they don't have solutions for all of them yet, but they would work with staff as far as readjusting where they put some of the trees and the introduction of a berm along the south I roperty line on Gervais Court side. Mr. Krumm had a question with respect, to existing material and trying to save as much of that .as possible on the southeast portion of the property. Mr. Krumm said the property was overgrown with volunteer growth and they would rather replant with new material and have a lawn area that could be manicured and maintained. Boardmember Erickson asked staff if they had seen the proposal to remove everything and then replant. Mr. Krumm said it would be consistent with the landscape plan they presented originally. Staff said they hadn't seen the proposal. Mr. Krumm said that one of the concerns was that they move the larger trees off the easement and keep them to the side of the property as much as possible so they wouldn't be interfering with underground utilities that are in that easement. Mr. Krumm said they had a heavy planting on that side because they wanted a screen from the parking lot. Community Design Review Board -10- Minutes of 07 -28 -98 Boardmember Erickson asked the applicant what they were proposing for the landscaping on the parking lot side. Mr. Krumm said it would be a combination of evergreens, with Austrian pine and black hill spruce. Boardmember Erickson said that when he looked west and north from the church parking lot there was a piece that comes off the parking lot in a wedge. Boardmember Erickson said he had a concern that, if the applicant does all the nice landscaping, the wedge is going to look pretty bad because it looks bad now. Mr. Krumm said he didn't have anything to define the church's edge and how far over some of that might have come. Boardmember Robinson asked how far the applicant's property ran. Mr. Krumm said it ran all the way to the street, that it was the entire triangle. Staff said this was the church's property and the city can't make them cut the trees. Mr. Krumm said the colors they are proposing for the building would be all identical to Carefree 1 11, and III as they exist in terms of the colors. The only thing they would depart from would be the color of the brick itself. They are proposing jumbo brick in brown tones and burgundy accent banding. The trim on the windows would be white except for the entry and solarium which would be largely wood and glass. Boardmember Robinson asked if they had considered making another band on the top of the building because of the height and length. Mr. Krumm said he was trying to come up with a good blend of vertical and horizontal to work against the length of the building and he felt that adding another horizontal band would just add more length to the building. Mr. Krumm said that, regarding parking spaces, they have a reserve parking area of 32 hard surface spots and if the need were there, they could utilize this area to get adequate numbers. Boardmember Robinson asked what they were currently proposing for this area. Mr. Krumm said it was just open. Boardmember Ledvina said staff had a question about the turning radius of the drive and he wondered if there was going to be a problem with the Fire Marshal in that regard. Mr. Krumm said he didn't anticipate a problem because it is the same outside radius that exists at Carefree III now. Boardmember Ledvina was concerned that, if the applicant starts changing the drive, it might change the overall configuration of the site and asked if there was enough room to make adjustments as they needed. Mr. Krumm said if they had to make an adjustment it would have to come from the setback on the side but they would want to maintain as much as they could along. Gervais. Boardmember Erickson asked staff if the Fire Marshal had looked at this and was okay with the radius. Staff said that the Fire Marshal did look at it and did not comment on the turnaround but commented on the sprinkler alarms and detectors. The Fire Marshal didn't indicate that he had a problem with the radius. Boardmember Ledvina asked what the applicant's opinion was regarding the original request as it relates to the zoning versus the city's thought that this should be a PUD. Mr. Krumm said the owner hasn't had conversations with the staff relative to that point yet. Boardmember Ledvina asked staff where that was going as it relates to the rezoning versus the PUD. Staff said they are recommending the PUD and denial of the rezoning. it will be going to the planning commission at the next meeting and will be dealt with there. Staff said the board would be taking action on the site plan, landscape plan, grading and drainage plans and building elevations, and possibly the issue of the parking waiver. Boardmember Robinson asked staff if the city had any problems in the past regarding parking when working with larger units such as this and accepted less parking spaces. Staff said that so far it has not been a problem. Community Design Review Board -11- Minutes of 07 -28 -98 Boardmember Ledvina moved to approve the following: D. 92 parking spaces (60 garage spaces and 32 open spaces), rather than the 120 spaces required by code for the Gervais Court senior housing project, because: 1. The parking space requirement is not proper for senior housing, because there are fewer cars per unit in these projects. 2. The city has approved fewer parking spaces for other senior housing, including the Village on Woodlynn, the Carefree Cottages and Cardinal Pointe. E. The plans date - stamped June 25, 1998 (site plan, landscape plan, grading and drainage plans and building elevations) for the Gervais Court senior housing development. The city .bases this approval on the findings required by the code. The developer or contractor shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit: a.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, sidewalk and driveway and parking lot plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: (1) The erosion control plan shall be consistent with city code. (2) The grading plan shall: (a) Include building, floor elevation and contour information. (b) Include contour information for the land that the construction will disturb. (c) Show sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city engineer.' (3) The entryway and driveway in front of the building shall meet the minimum standards for turning and access for firefighting equipment. (4) All the parking areas and driveways shall have continuous concrete curb and gutter except where the city engineer decides that it is not needed for drainage purposes. b. Submit a lawn-irrigation plan to staff showing the location of sprinkler heads. c. Submit a certificate of survey for all new construction. d. Revise the landscape plan for city staff approval showing: (1) That all proposed trees would be consistent with city standards for size, location and species. Community Design Review Board -12- Minutes of 07 -28 -98 (2) The 24 proposed large trees in the utility easement moved to within five feet of the east property line. (3) A berm and additional trees along the south side of the site near, Gervais Court, subject to city staff approval. This is to provide additional screening and buffering from the businesses to the south of the site. (4) As much of the existing vegetation along the eastern property line preserved as possible. e. The fire chief shall approve the access to the building for firefighting needs. f. Submit elevations to the city for staff approval showing colors and materials for all sides of the building. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction. b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. c. Install reflectorized stop signs at the exit, a handicap - parking sign for each handicap- parking space and an address on the building. In addition, the applicant shall install stop signs and traffic directional signs within the site, as required by staff. d. Paint any roof -top mechanical equipment to match the uppermost part of the building. Screen all roof- mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property. (code requirement) e. Construct trash dumpster and recycling enclosures as city code requires for any dumpsters or storage containers that the owner or building manager would keep outside the building. Any such enclosures must match the materials and colors of the building. f. Install and maintain an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas. g. Install continuous concrete curb and gutter along all interior driveways and around all open parking stalls. h. Install a storm shelter in a central location in the apartment building. This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the Maplewood director of emergency preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population. I. Install on -site lighting for security and visibility, subject to city staff approval. j. The developer or contractor shall: (1) Complete all grading for the site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. Community Design Review Board -13- Minutes of 07 -28 -98 (2)* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. (3) Remove any debris or junk from the site. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter, of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5. This approval does not include the signs. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 6oardmember Robinson seconded. Ayes --all The motion passed. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Joe's Crab Shack WCATION: West of 1749 Beam Avenue DATE: August 17, 1998 INTRODUCTION Agenda item Action by Council: Endorse 1todifie ReJ ected,.�., Date On August 10, 1998, the city council tabled their review of Joe's Crab Shack because the applicant was absent from the meeting. There have been no changes since August 1.0 that affect the memorandum. I have attached the original memo for your review. p:lsec3l oescrab.mem Attachment: July 23,1998 Joe's Crab Shack Memorandum MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: DATE: INTRODUt City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Joe's Crab Shack West of 1749 Beam Avenue July 23, 1998 �T1ON Project Description Mr. Gent' Mullins, of Landry's Seafood Restaurants, Inc., is proposing to build an 8,884- square- foot, one story Joe's Crab Shack restaurant at Birch Run Station west of the Olive Garden. Refer to the maps on pages 7 -9. The building would have an exterior of brick and horizontal -lap wood siding with a metal roof. Refer to the building elevations. This restaurant would also have a 40- by 40 -foot outdoor playground with sliding and climbing equipment for children. Requests Mr. Mullins is requesting that the city approve: 1 A parking reduction authorization to have five fewer spaces than the code requires. Code requires 104 spaces --the site would have 99. Birch Run Station has already recorded cross easements for access and shared parking. Refer to the letter on page 12. 2. The vacation of a five- foot -wide utility easement. Refer to the letter on page 13. 3. A lot division to create the site. 4. Building, site and landscape plans. 5. The proposed wall and pylon signs. DISCUSSION Parking Reduction Authorization Staff does not have any problem with the requested parking reduction. Birch Run Station has a large number of unused parking spaces that the applicant could use as overflow parking. Birch Run Station, furthermore, has already recorded cross easements for access and shared parking. Staff is recommending that the applicant revise the site plan to provide a parking lot connection to the Olive Garden parking lot at the southerly end of the site. Refer to the map on page 1 0. This connection would cause the loss of four of the proposed parking spaces, but would add six and provide traffic flow between the two restaurant sites. The total number of parking spaces would increase from 99 to 101 and improve the traffic circulation between the dive Garden and Joe's Crab Shack. The proposed location of the applicant's pylon sign would have to be moved to the green strip south of the parking lot curb. Easement Vacation There is no need to retain the five -foot utility easement. It serves no public purpose for storm sewer, sanitary sewer or water. The utility systems for the shopping center are presently in place and they do not use this easement. Lot Division Staff sees no reason to deny this lot division. As a condition, the council should require that the applicant record cross easements for access and parking between this site and the abutting properties. Building Design The proposed building would be attractive. The city typically does not allow wood. siding because of the need for periodic painting. In this case, though, wood siding is an integral part of the Joe's Crab Shack image. A weathered appearance is a look that the applicant has utilized on other buildings. The majority of the building would still be no- maintenance brick. Site and Landscaping Concerns 1. The proposed landscaped strip along the east side of the site should be revised to accommodate a 24- foot -wide drive aisle to serve the alive Garden parking lot. Refer to the Staff Proposal on page 14. When the Olive Garden was developed, they installed a 13 -foot- wide drive aisle adjacent to their westerly parking row. The Olive Garden site plan, approved in 1989, anticipated an adjacent parking lot separated by a 24- foot -wide, shared drive aisle. Refer to the map on page 11. The applicant should provide this widened driveway and wrap curb and gutter around their easterly landscape island as shown on staffs revision. 2. As stated above, the applicant should revise the site plan to provide a driveway connection to the Olive Garden site. 3. Tom Johnson, with the St. Paul Water Utility, requested that the applicant not plant any trees within ten feet of any water main. The landscape plan shows trees planted along the easterly north /south planting strip on the east side of the site. This planting strip lies on a water utility easement. By scaling the distance from the water main, it appears that the trees will be ten feet or more away from the main. The city should require this setback from the water main, though, as a condition of approval. Signs The city's approval of Birch Run Station's comprehensive sign plan required that the community design review board (CDRB) approve the signage for the future, individual businesses on the site. The applicant is proposing five wall signs and one freestanding sign. Refer to the packet of colored drawings. The strict interpretation of the sign code would allow the applicant to have two signs —one on the building and one freestanding or two on the building. (Code allows two signs for each street frontage bounding the site.) E With comprehensive sign plans, the ordinance allows the CDRB to approve exceptions to the sign regulations "if the sign areas and densities for the plan as a whole are in conformity with the intent of this article and if such exception results in an improved relationship between the various parts of the plan." The first point cannot be met since the sign densities would not be in conformity with the intent of the ordinance. On the second point, however, the city must determine that the six signs proposed, over the two allowed, would result in an improved relationship between the various parts of the plan. Staff feels that it is reasonable to allow signage visible from Birch Run Station's parking lot to the rear. Signs may even add to the appearance of a building if they provide additional interest to a building facade. In this instance, Joe's Crab Shack .uses signs as part of their image. To be fair with the other freestanding businesses at Birch Run Station (Olive Garden and McDonalds), though, staff does not suggest approval of the five proposed wall signs. It seems reasonable, however, to allow two wall signs and one freestanding sign. The applicant can use the extra wall sign on the north side of the building if they choose. COMMITTEE ACTIONS July 14, 1998: The community design review board (CDRB) recommended approval of: 1. The parking reduction authorization to provide 99 parking spaces rather than 104. 2. Building and site plans. 3 Identification signs. The CDRB did not follow the staff recommendation and require the front east -west driveway connection to the Olive Garden site. The board felt that it would cause too much extra traffic to go past the front of Joe's Crab Shack. July 20, 1998: The planning commission recommended approval of the utility easement vacation. They also moved to require that the front drive aisle connect to the Olive Garden site as staff had recommended. Further Discussion about the Connecting Drive Aisle Staff is holding with our original recommendation to require the site plan revision that would provide the southerly drive aisle connection to the Olive Garden site. We recommend this to meet the intent of the originally approved site plan for Birch Run Station. This connection would make convenient access to both sites from either direction and would improve traffic flow. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approve a parking space reduction to allow a total of 101 parking spaces instead of 104, because: 1. Birch Run Station has a large number of unused parking spaces that the applicant could use as overflow parking. 2. Birch Run Station and the Olive Garden have cross easements in place allowing shared parking and driveway access. 3 This parking reduction is conditioned upon the applicant revising the site plan as staff shows in the memorandum for the Joe's Crab Shack review. B. Adopt the resolution on pages 14-15, vacating the five -foot -wide water utility easement running north /south on the east edge of the site north of Beam Avenue. The city council should vacate this easement because: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The utility systems are already in place for this area and do not follow the alignment of this easement. C. Approve a lot division to create the Joe's Crab Shack site, subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner shall dedicate and record cross easements for access and parking between the Joe's Crab Shack site and the abutting properties. 2. This property owner shall provide the city with proof this easement agreement has been recorded before the city approves the deed for the lot split. 3. The new deed shall be recorded within one year. D. Approve the plans, date - stamped June 24, 1998, for the proposed Joe's Crab Shack restaurant west of 1749 Beam Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by the code and subject to the following' conditions: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall: a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to the city engineer for approval. b. Provide evidence of recorded cross easements for parking and access between the owners of Joe's Crab Shack and the abutting properties. c. Revise the site plan as shown on the map labeled Staff Proposal in the memorandum which shows: (1) A 24- foot -wide drive aisle adjacent to the Olive Garden's westerly north /south parking row. The applicant shall wrap the adjacent landscape island with curb and gutter. (2) The addition of six parking spaces across the southerly parking row. 4 (3) The deletion of four parking spaces from the Joe's Crab Shack site to allow for unobstructed traffic flow between the Olive Garden and Joe's. d. Revise the landscape plan to provide a ten -foot tree setback from the water main for that part of the planting area that is over the water utility easement. If a ten -foot setback cannot be provided, the applicant shall substitute these trees with shrubs of a variety to be approved by staff. 3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Install reflectorized stop signs at both exits and a handicap parking sign for each handicap parking space. b. Paint the rooftop mechanical equipment, if used, to match the building color. c. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d. Provide site security lighting that is aimed or shielded so not to shine into driver's eyes. e. Install continuous concrete curbing around the parking lots and drives. f. Paint the louvered screens on the south side of the building a neutral color to blend in with the building color, not black as proposed. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring and summer. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. E. Approval of the following signage for Joe's Crab Shack: 1. A maximum of two wall- mounted identification signs. 2. One ground sign. 3. The size and placement of all signs must comply with the city ordinance. 4. Staff may approve minor modifications to the sign plan. 5 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.8 acres Existing land use: Undeveloped SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Birch Run Station shopping center South: Beam Avenue, the Outback restaurant and undeveloped commercial property Vies: Birch Run Station shopping center East: Olive Garden restaurant PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: BC (business commercial) Zoning: BC p:sec3\Joescrab.des Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Staffs Proposal 5. Olive Garden/Birch Run Station Site Pian 6. Parking Reduction Request 7. Easement Vacation Request 8. Easement Vacation Resolution 9. Plans and Colored Elevations/Sign Details date - stamped June 24, 1998 (separate attachments) Attachment 1 DNAIS HEIGHTS COUNTY ROAD COUNTY RD. a WOODLY (; J IWO 2'2 00 LYDIA a if 4. p V L G t . SUMMR CT. g Qo �- � Z• Z. COUNTRWEW CIR. S`T in v v F P 3. DULUTH CT. 6 �OyN, 0 0 z . 3. Ile 4. LYDIA AVE. ® BEAM MrMOOPI BEAM �.3 Y IrtAPLE U O RADATZ O v 0: MESSABI AV 1 3 � ° o • Mockhom RAMSFY Pon W COUNTY _ CO URT KOHLIAAN AVE. �n w KOHLMAN Casey z Worth t�,r Lake u �� a AVE. W� � �a 3 .UNTY ROAD. C m > HJ r N Cr W EDGEHILL RD. �! c w NOR � o, M O� AVE. � v ; � DE MOW AVE. � BROOKS AVE vii BROOKS _ CL O AVE. El Ey fNTH �-- W o SEX TANT a t rii s o a� o AvE. AVE. Pork per. A VE. �c W o � GERVAIS AVE. } GERVAIS 1 GERVAIS v GRANDVIEW AVE. z CT. Y c� VIKING DR. SHERREN AVE. CASTLE AVE. �, O t; Kn C e s od Lake COPE AVE. COPE AVE. !g G N LARK C? n LAR Q AVE. � a RAE RD. AVE. LAU v7 �" N Z o CO. R0. N LAURIE RD. o LAURIE ° RD. w h Z a � Pais W W LELAN RD. 0 SAND URST AVE. g o W v z z Z r JUNCTION AVE.. w z 8 Y CO. RD: > B P er* a VVM/ . •I►. it r. r I1 .►. iw. .. r LOCATION MAP 4 N Attachment 2 MENNEN. 859•G5 & "Ul t. 1 1 0 El AiT 460 o8•z4- Igo 6 7 mr, 6r 3 N + 1, 00 1. #02 3 $ BIRCH RUN STATION 1.4 10>1 r {If1 h i � I \ to K LOT-7 B.LK-.I oz (7) an 40 BC McDONALD'S L16 1 14 Ito' is y 53 04 ry - 204.67 (6) iwqo I - s 1 E 0. 2 00 OLIVE PROPOSED GARDEN j �F, '� �t ' IMP LOT SPLIT 23 sy (7) .... ............ L d) z z .............. : E3LK I -X-X... 59.5 So 4S 40 ......... ...... .......... Doc. N o. .......... .... 243.4 34114* ...... 11*31ROW 11A.3A—AW 0 , fq 0 "+ *All BEAM AVENUE WANIN 0 *% o.),r. IN Ip C) IN 2. 2 C. OUTBACK B Co M I 1 17' STEAKHOUSE rh TO WA r,, 0 ry 82 �� — 3 .00 I V -a NIP 0 30&w 00 ac. 5 - R. . I O2O (p VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD o -37 4• 1-73 Qc,. PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP PROPOSED JOE'S CRAB SHACK SITE 4 Attachment 3 SITE PLAN 9 4 N 1 1 art C ��• 1 1 7 •4� ~ 1 1 � r t t 1 IN 1 1 • 1 • t l C 1 1 0 11 1 1 1 r st P" i 1 - i i ti I /"' - 1 i� 1 1 t tC t ` 1 1 C: ' .lot's Crab*" 1 ; r M M i tCl ~ t 1 L-J i ♦ I 1 y Woo :C l p 1 1 11 I 1 1 to .0 MUM - -- - - -- - -- t t -- �• -- - - r - " fl� i r er 1 - - -• -- $a IIN11'31'w 102.11 ----.----••------- l- ------------ 1 ♦ ---•-•-•• ---- ••- •--- .- - 2104 36.1:----- •--- - - - - -- - - - -- ..- ..�-- w -•••- • -. - - -- - •-- •------ •- .•- • - -. -. w w�a.r - • - - -- 00 0 ^ 0 '16r -- -...- -- - ---- - -•��- -- - - - - - -- _ - -- .-- •--•---------•--_---. 5�.____- �__-------- •----- ••.__- _ -_ - - -• •- •- - - -_ -• •_•� -.1• ... -. _ Sao-oww Ida A MWE does loplirl" IDS. ••__--_-__•-_ _-•_-•--_--_-_•----------- ••r/IrsMIr�M 1�••-- _- N�1- •• - -• - -• SITE PLAN 9 4 N Attachment 4 �/�; f I I 1 1 .N t.............. 111.h o,,,- OLIVE L. GARDEN PARKING - -" 40 laws i - 6 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES STAFF'S PROPOSAL 10 4 N ______________________ �____. ENCLOSE GREEN AREA �C. i WITH CURB AND GUTTER 1 1 ICI 1 1 �� ♦ ♦♦ ..% "wi!!'t TAM ` in i� to 1 , $I O LIVE . c 1 ....._.... 1 : v 4w 1 � GARDEN PARKING M � L C • tY► A ,^1 1 M I I s 24= FOOTmWIDE i ' M g 1 1 J DRIVE AISLE �/�; f I I 1 1 .N t.............. 111.h o,,,- OLIVE L. GARDEN PARKING - -" 40 laws i - 6 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES STAFF'S PROPOSAL 10 4 N Attachment 5 P - V V D t:= C= Q 1p qw t . / IT I LIM I U LLM C �m ` � r ---- -- � t _ M ill u t 1 KIDS R US u n OLIVE GARDEN SITE ,., MARSHAL'S ' {It o nmu I t u I I 114 ' I I IIi II �^ CO.— ep pq ; it CD . f � qlL rw T, 171 sop OLIVE GARDEN /BIRCH RUN STATION SITE PLAN 4 N 0 RESTAURANTS, INC. Attachment 6 1400 Post Oak Blvd. • Suite 530 * Houston, Texas 77056 • 713/850-1991 • Fax 713/961-4911 Mr.Tom Ekstrand City of Maplewood 1803 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Proposed Joe's Crab Shack City Parking Requirements Dear Mr. Ekstrand: June 24, 1998 Per your calculations, city code requires that our proposed Joe's Crab Shack at Birch Run Shopping Center have a minimum of 104 parking spaces based on 5,217 sq /ft of patron area. Our proposed site plan only contains 99 parking places. In order to meet the city parking requirements it will be necessary for Joe's Crab Shack to use 5 parking spaces, which belong to the shopping center. We have the legal use of the Shopping Center's parking through a perpetual cross parking agreement currently in place between the two properties. The owners of the shopping center have no problem with this arrangement. Given the above, we respectfully request that we are allowed to use five parking spaces in the shopping center to meet city code requirements. Sincerely, Gerry Mullins Property Developer Landry's Seafood Restaurant Inc. w 1, JUN 2 4 19 l t ! ti i ='S► �.. s 1 ' it A « .mod =� �� F ,� �� T `� '+�, • Attachment 7 NESTAURANTS,INC. 1400 Post Oak Blvd. • Suite 530 • Houston, Texas 77056 • 713/850-1991 • Fax 713/961-4911 Mr.Tom Ekstrand City of Maplewood 1803 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 June 24, 1998 RE: Proposed Joe's Crab Shack Vacation of Easement Dear Mr. Ekstrand: As you. are aware, our proposed site at Birch Run Shopping Center is encumbered by an existing 5' wide utility easement. (dedicated to the city) which was probably put in place before the shopping center was developed in anticipation of its future use. The shopping center has since been developed and the easement has played no part in providing any services or utilities to the shopping center or anywhere else for that matter. The easement is currently not occupied by any utilities, nor would it need to be used in the future .given that utilities for the shopping center are already in place elsewhere. The shopping center owners have no problem with the vacation of this easement and have accordingly signed the Easement Vacation Petition. The vacant easement runs directly through the center of our proposed site, which makes the site impossible to develop unless this easement is vacated. Given the above, we hereby respectfully request that this vacant easement be released/vacated so that this parcel of land can be put to productive use. Sincerely, Gerry Mullins Property Developer Landry's Seafood Restaurant Inc. � / � .. �;., t`.`yl►.•L U Millie � Attachment 8 EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Landry's Seafood Restaurants, Inc., requested the vacation of the following described water utility easement: THAT PART OF THE 5.00 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ADJOINING THE WEST LINE OF LOT 8 BLOCK 1, AS DEDICATED ON THE PLAT OF MAPLEWOOD MALL ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 16 SECOND EAST, (FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS DESCRIPTION THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 8 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 89 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST), A DISTANCE OF 23.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 196.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 267.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 135.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LINE TO BE DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST 91.00 FEET AND SAID LINE THERE TERMINATING. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On July 20, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this vacation. 2. On , 1998, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: ALL THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22 AND ALSO ALL THAT PART OF LOT 8, BLOCK 1, MAPLEWOOD MALL ADDITION, ALL IN RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE EASTERLY ON AN ASSUMED BEARING OF SOUTH 89 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 987.04 FEET; THENCE DEFLECTING RIGHT 90 DEGREES 90 MINUTES 00 SECONDS ON A BEARING OF SOUTH 00 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 950.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL TO BE DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING ON A BEARING OF SOUTH 00 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 282.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 102.33 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 26 NUNUTES 16 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 23.01 FEET; 14 THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 1.96.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 44 MIN -UT.ES 18 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 267.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 28.MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 135.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF. 91.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 37.6.2 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 02 SECONDS AND A RADIUS OF 60.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST TANGENT TO SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 44.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THERE TERMINATING. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described vacations for the following reasons: 1 It is in the public interest. 2. The utility systems are already in place for this area and do not follow the alignment of this easement. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1998. 15 MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JULY 14 1998 VI. DESIGN REVIEW A. Joe's Crab Shack, Beam Avenue - Landry's Seafood, Inc. Gerry Mullins, of Landry's Seafood Restaurants, Inc., was present and told the boardmembers a little about his company. Mr. Mullins said they refer to their architecture as Gulf Coast architecture. Mr. Mullins said they typically use almost entirely reconstituted materials, such as, old wood and old tin roofs. Boardmember Erickson asked if there were many design changes made for the building here. M Mullins said they have gone. to a brick wainscot around the bottom of the building to give it a cleaner look and they have toned down their sign package. M Mullins asked if the reason for the lot split was for tax purposes. Staff didn't know the reasons but PP resumed the applicant wanted to own their own property. Mr. p Mullins said that they had no intention of using the five foot utility easement. M Mullins said that their site plan shows 99 parking spaces and that the only way they can meet the city code requirement of 104 parking spaces would be to use some of the parking spaces in the shopping center. Staff has reco mmended that the applicant revise the site plan to provide a parking lot connection to the Olive Garden parking lot at the southerly end of the site. The connection would cause the loss of four of the proposed parking spaces, but would d six and provide traffic flow between the two restaurant sites. The total number of ad p parking spaces would increase from 99 to 101 and improve the traffic circulation between the Olive Garde and Joe's Crab Shack. Boardmember Erickson asked if the applicant had any concerns or problems with cars g oing back and forth on the drive between the Olive Garden and their property. Mr. Mullins said the only problem they had is that they didn't want it to become a shortcut for cars to go through to get to the mall. Staff has recommended that the proposed landscaped strip along the east side of the s ite s hould hould be revised to accommodate a 24- foot -wide drive aisle to serve the Olive Garden arkin lot. When the Olive Garden was developed, they installed a 13 -foot- P g wide drive aisle adjacent to their westerly parking row. The Olive Garden site plan, � approved in 1989, anticipated an adjacent parking lot separated by a 2 4-foot-wide, PP shared drive aisle. The applicant should provide this widened driveway and wrap their easterly landscape island as shown in staff's revision. curb and gutter around th y P Boardmember Robinson asked staff if there were 109 parking spaces and how many additional spaces would be gained if we go in the opposite direction. Staff said they came up P with 101 spaces, with one or two having been on the Olive Garden site. Staff said that even if went back to the 99 parking spaces proposed, staff was okay with that because of the abundance of additional parking. There was a discussion about signage for Joe's Crab Shack. Boardmember Erickson asked the a pp y were applicant if the going to put signage up on the green fascia. Mr. 9 9 Mullins said that the g reen fascia was the roof. Boardmember Shankar said that the roofto p equipment mechanical a ui ment should match the roof color instead of matching the building color as stated under Item D 3. b. of the staff report. Mr. Mullins s aid there would be nothing on the front side of the roof and on the back side there might be one or two vents. Boardmember Shankar asked if the floor line was three feet above grade. Mr. Mullins said it was actually two and one half feet above grade. Boardmember Shankar had some questions about the grading between the garage door to the service area and the restaurant. Boardmember Erickson asked about the trash containers. Mr. Mullins said that the trash containers were all inside. Boardmember Erickson asked if the applicant was running cable wiring across the deck area. Mr. Mullins said this was wood railings. Boardmember Robinson said that the restaurant entrance faced the south and asked the applicant if this was why they didn't want the street to go through. Mr. Mullins agreed. Boardmember Robinson asked if the public was coming in on the west as well. Mr. Mullins said no, that typically the public would come in the south entrance where the reception, area will be. The exit shown on the west is actually a fire exit. Boardmembers discussed the signage for Joe's Crab Shack. Boardmember Erickson asked staff if two signs were the maximum. Staff said that under the sign code a business can have two signs for each street frontage that they have. Staff said that the applicant only had one street frontage. Staff is not recommending approval of the five proposed wall signs but felt it was reasonable to allow two wall signs and one freestanding sign. Staff said Olive Garden has three wall signs and one ground sign because they are on the corner and can have a total of four plus the code gives them an extra one because they are on an intersection. McDonald's only has two signs, one on their building and one on their pole. Staff recommended two signs on Joe's Crab Shack building and one on the pole. Boardmember Erickson asked staff if the "Free Crab Tomorrow" would be considered a sign if it is painted on. Staff said yes it would be. Boardmember Erickson asked if it would have to be eliminated. Boardmember Robinson said it was a north elevation and the applicant could choose to put it on the back side. Boardmember Robinson asked staff if, as an extra consideration, the applicant can use the extra wall sign on the north if they choose and would that be in addition to the two wall signs and the freestanding sign. Staff said that the applicant could have only two signs on the building wherever they wished and one on a pole. Mr. Mullins said they would want Joe's Crab Shack as a sign in the front but didn't think they wanted "Free Crab Tomorrow" as a second sign because in their view it wasn't really a sign. Mr. Mullins said that the Eat at Joe's sign and Joe's Crab Shack sign are their two main signs so they would leave the Eat at Joe's sign on the side that would catch traffic coming from one way and the majority of the shopping center, and leave the Joe's Crab Shack sign on the front elevation. Boardmember Robinson asked where the freestanding sign was going. Mr. Mullins said their original plan showed this sign in the southeast corner but it should be in the southwest corner because they didn't want to encroach on the olive Garden's territory too much. Boardmember Shankar said that if the freestanding sign was put on the southwest corner that the applicant might not want the other sign on the west side but on the north side instead. The applicant agreed that the best place for the signs would be one on the north elevation, one on the south, and the freestanding - sign on the southwest would take care of the west side. Staff agreed that this would be acceptable. Boardmember Shankar asked if any of the signs were illuminated on the building. Mr. Mullins said the Joe's Crab Shack sign and the Eat at Joe's sign would be in neon lights. Boardmember Shankar asked what the black thing was on the front of the building. Mr..Mullins said it was a louvre. Boardmember Shankar asked if the louvre was going to paint it black. Mr. Mullins said it was a screen and not actually painted black. Boardmember Shankar said if it was black that it would detract from the appearance. Mr. Mullins said it could be painted to match one of the other colors. Boardmember Erickson asked the board to decide about the parking issue regarding the connection between Joe's and the Olive Garden. Mr. Mullins said they would like to have it closed because it is their front entrance. Boardmember Robinson said she would respect the privacy of Joe's Crab Shack site itself and leave it closed. Boardmember Shankar said he agreed with Boardmember Robinson. Boardmember Shankar moved to approve the following: A. A parking space reduction to allow a total of 99 parking spaces instead of 104, because Birch Run Station has a large number of unused parking spaces that the applicant could use as overflow parking. B. The plans, date- stamped June 24, 1998, for the proposed Joe's Crab Shack restaurant west of 1749 Beam Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall: a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to the city engineer for approval. b. Provide evidence of recorded cross easements for parking and access between the owners of Joe's Crab Shack and the abutting properties. c. Revise the site plan as shown on the map labeled Staff Proposal in the memorandum which shows a 24- foot -wide drive aisle adjacent to the Olive Garden's westerly north /south parking row. The applicant shall wrap the adjacent landscape island with curb and gutter. d. Revise the landscape plan to provide a ten -foot tree setback from the water main for that.part of the planting area that is over the water utility easement. If a ten -foot setback cannot be provided, the applicant shall substitute these trees with shrubs of a variety to be approved by staff. 3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. install reflectorized stop signs at both exits and a handicap parking sign for each handicap parking space. b. Paint the rooftop mechanical equipment, if used, to match the building color. c. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d. Provide site security lighting that is aimed or shielded so not to shine into driver's eyes. e. Install continuous concrete curbing around the parking Lots and drives. f. The color of the louvered screen on the south side shall be a neutral color. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall. be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring and summer. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. C. Signage for Joe's Crab Shack: 1. A maximum of two wall - mounted identification signs. 2. One ground sign... The. size and placement of all signs must comply with the city. ordinance. 3. T p 4. Staff ma y approve rove minor modifications to the sign plan. Boardmember Robinson seconded. Ayes -all MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JULY 20 1998 v. ..NEW BUSINESS A. Easement Vacation - Birch Run Station (Joe's Crab Shack - Beam Avenue) Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Fischer asked why they were not actin upon the approval of a parking space reduction. Staff said that the planning 9 p pp P 9 P Commission may make a recommendation on this even though the community design review board already has. Staff said there was no set policy. Mr. John Weiers, property manager of the Birch Run Station. owned by the Welsh Companies, was present for Mr. Gerry Mullins of Landry's Seafood Restaurants, the applicant, who was unable to attend the meeting. Commissioner Rossbach asked how many empty tenant spaces there were in the main building of the Birch Run Station. Mr. Weiers said there were two empty tenant spaces. This means about 73% of square footage is occupied. Commissioner Thompson said that, in regard to cross easements in place for shared parking and driveway access, he was not impressed by the access to either parking lot at the southern end of the property. He said that if we were going to insist on it, then we should provide some form of conflict resolution as part of it. He felt that it would be too convenient for some of the customers to go over to the other guy's parking lot. Commissioner Rossbach said that the reason the cross easements were being set up was so customers could park in anybody's lot. Commissioner Thompson said he had a problem with the southern opening to Beam Avenue. He said he has seen cases where it has Caused hardship for the less popular tenant, in that, his real parking area was encroached upon. Mr. Weiers said that on the lefthand side there was ample parking also in the main lot. Mr. Weiers said there was also another cross easement between Olive Garden and McDonald's and the southern end of the McDonald's lot is fairly big so there is ample parking there. Mr. Weiers felt there was ample parking around the two restaurants on a busy night to accommodate all parking. Commissioner Frost moved the planning commission recommend: B. Adoption of the resolution vacating the five- foot -wide water utility easement running north /south on the east edge of the site north of Beam Avenue. The city council should vacate this easement because: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The utility systems are already in place for this area and do not follow the alignment of this easement. C. Approval of a lot division to create the Joe's Crab Shack site, subject to the following conditions: 1. The property Owner shall dedicate and record cross easements for access and parking between the Joe's Crab Shack site and the abutting properties. 2. This property owner shall provide the city with proof this easement agreement has been recorded before the city approves the deed for the lot split. 3. The new deed shall be recorded within one year. i sion Ledvina seconded. Ayes—all Commis The motion passed. • cons of requ a drive connection to ' ion had a discussion about the pros and co The comm the Olive Garden. comm recommend approval of a parking Commissioner Rossbach moved the planning com because: space reduction to allow a t total of 101 parking spaces instead of 10 4 , 1. Birch Run Station has a large number of unused parking spaces that the applicant could use as overflow parking. 2. birch Run Station and the Olive G arden have cross easements in. place allowing shared parking and driveway access. • n the ma 3. Revise the site plan as shown o p labeled Staff Proposal in the memorandum which shows: • adjacent to the Olive Garden's westerly north /south parking (a) A 24- foot -wide drive aisle adJace and utter. hall wrap the adjacent g row. The applicant s p acent landscape island with curb J 8 (b) The addition of six parking spaces across the southerly parking row. • aces from the Joe's Crab (c) The deletion of four parking spaces Shack site to allow for unobstructed traffic flow between the Olive Garden and Joe , s. • � conditioned upon the a staff This parking reduction is conditioned p applicant revising the site plan as sta shows in the memorandum for the Joe's Crab Shack review. Commissioner Frost seconded. • e inclusion of Item 3 (c) showing the deletion of four Commissioner Thompson did not agree with th betw the • Shack site to allow for unobstructed traffic flow betty parking spaces from the Joe's Crab applicant in terms of ' C Ledvina said he would pp Olive Garden and Joe's. ld defer to the C that with the cross flows, • he traffic situation. Commissioner Fischer said , their regarding t from the McDonaid's area so what we alread have an existing situation with what's coming across . y traffic coming through McDonald 's coming this way. we may see is a transfer from some of the tr , g clientele • as though the Olive Garden has a very dedicated Commissioner Fischer said it sounds 9 Fischer said it • put off b not the easiest paths to g which has not been p Y et there. commissioner be putting in a new cross through that isn 't already here, it's just that we ma like we are not Y looks P displacing part of it. Ayes—Fischer, Frost, Rossbach, Seeber y ri Nays -- Ledvina, Thompson, pp ler The motion passed. Agenda Item SZ MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT. Code Change — Residential Building Height Requirements DATE: August 14, 1998 INTRODUCTION Request ,fiction by Council: Endorse Modified..,..„. Rej ecte _.,.........,..,.,,„ Date - .._._. Amend the residential building height requirements in the city code to reflect current building trends and establish consistent building height criteria. Reason for the Request On April 27, 1998, the city council approved a three -foot height variance for Jim Haase to build a house on the lot at 3016 Frank Street next to Kohiman Overlook Park. Mr. Haase's house would be 33 feet tall --the code allows a maximum of 30 feet. The council also directed staff to review the zoning code for residential building height to conform to current building practices. BACKGROUND July 6, 1998: The city council discussed this ordinance amendment and directed staff to forward it, to the planning commission for their review and recommendation. August 10, 1998: The city council gave the attached Ordinance first reading. CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS 1. The following are Maplewood's building height maximums for single, double and multiple dwellings: Section 36 -68 requires that single dwellings not exceed a height of 30 feet or 2 % stories, except structures mentioned in paragraph five of the previous code section. (This previous section, however, discusses floor areas and does not mention building height.) Section 36 -83(d) requires that residential- estate single dwellings follow the standard single dwelling height requirements. Section 36 -84.2 requires that small -lot single dwellings not exceed a height of 30 feet measured from any street grade of the site. Section 36 -87 requires that double dwellings not exceed a height of 30 feet measured from the front or street grade of the site. Section 36- 119(h) requires that R -3A multiple dwellings (multiple dwellings with 3 to 17 units per building) not exceed a height of 36 feet measured from grade level in front of the building. Section 36- 122(h) requires that R -3B multiple dwellings (multiple dwellings with 17 or more units er building) not exceed a height of 35 feet or three stories, whichever is greater, p g measured from the front of the building, unless granted a conditional use permit. Section 36- 124(1) requires that R -3C multiple dwellings (townhomes) follow the R -3A requirements stated above, unless varied by conditional use permit. 2. Shoreland Overlay District Section 36- 566(a)(3) requires that all structures in a shoreland overlay district not exceed a height of 25 feet, unless they are churches, nonresidential agricultural structures or have been approved as part of a planned unit development. .3. g(definition): of Building Height The vertical distance between a building's highest adjoining g ground level or ten (10) feet above the building's lowest ground level, whichever is lower, and the highest point of a flat roof or the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. Height of building shall not include chimneys, spires, towers, roof -top mechanical equipment, elevator penthouses, tanks or similar building projections. DISCUSSION As the survey on page 4 shows, Maplewood Compares closely to Other cities in the maximum building height allowed for single and multiple dwellings. Staff is recommending that the City council increase the maximum building height to 35 feet to be in line with other area cities and to g reco nize the trend for taller, steeper roof pitches. The Criteria for multiple dwellings would require a maximum of 35 feet or three stories. The proposed code Changes would establish consistent criteria for all types of residential construction, except in shoreland overlay districts where the maximum height would still be 25 feet. The proposed code would simplify and clarify the way we measure building height. The definition of building height would simply state that height would be measured from the average grade direct) in front of the building instead of the g y assorted descriptions in our various code sections. I used the term "directly" to avoid the possibility that someone may attempt to measure from an "average grade" elsewhere in the front yard that may be advantageous to them. For instance, there may be a high point in the front yard that, if used as a point for measurement, would result in a taller building than the Code would intend. I also added a provision in each zoning district to allow taller building height by conditional use permit (CUP). The alternative to a CUP would be to require a variance such as with Jim Haase's recent proposal. The CUP process allows the city council to use their discretion in building height matters. The variance approval process hinges on the finding that strict g g adherence of the code would cause the property owner undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. This finding is not always applicable and can be unfairly limiting. 2 COMMISSION ACTION On July 20, 1998, the planning commission recommended approval of the attached Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the code amendment on pages 5-6: This code amendment revises the residential building height standards in the. Maplewood City Code. p :ordlbuiId- ht(5.1) Attachments: 1. Survey of Residential Building Height Requirements 2. Code Amendment 3 Attachment 1 SURVEY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS CITY 1.. Maplewood 2. Woodbury 3. North St. Paul 4. Roseville 5. Vadnais Heights 6. Little Canada 7..Cottage Grove 8. Shoreview 9. White Bear Township 10. Oakdale 11. White Bear Lake SINGLE DWELLINGS .MULTIPLE DWELLINGS (height maximum — (height maximum — measured to mid roofs measured to mid roof) 30 ft or 2 '/2 stories 36 ft or 3 stories 40 ft or 3 stories 40 ft or 3 stories 35 ft 35 ft 30 ft 30 ft or 3 stories 28 ft 33 ft 30 ft 36 ft (measured to roof peak) (measured to roof peak) 35 ft 2 stories 35 ft 35 ft 40 ft 40 ft 28 ft 33 ft 35 ft 35 ft From what point is the height measured? Most of these cities measure the building height from the average lot grade White Bear Lake, as well as Maplewood, measures from the grade in the front of the house White Bear Township measures from the lowest rae How Maplewood Compares Average maximum single dwelling height: 33.6 feet Median maximum single dwelling height: 35 feet Average maximum multiple dwelling height: 35 feet Median maximum multiple dwelling height: 36 feet 4 ORDINANCE NO, Attachment 2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING RESIDENTIAL BUILDING HEIGHT STANDARDS The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Section 1. Section 36 -6. Definitions. Height of building: The vertical distance of a building measured from the mean grade level directly in front of the building to the midpoint of a pitched roof and the toD of a flat roof. ' oil A 0-06 ' Height of building shall not include chimneys, spires, towers, roof -top mechanical equipment, elevator penthouses, -taf°rlfs or similar building projections. Section 2. Section 36 -68. Height of Buildings. No single dwelling buildAllmig in an R -1 Residence District shall exceed a height of 35 feet, unless the city council approves a conditional use permit. be Section 36- 83(d). Maximum building height. No single dwelling in an. R -E. Residential Estate district shall exceed a height of 35 feet, unless the city council approves a_conditional use p ermit. %041%71 1 I %AVV%'IIII 1g). Section 36 -84.2. Height of Buildings. No sinale dwelling in an R -1 S district.shall exceed a hei hg t of 35 feet, unless the city council approves a conditional use permit. Section 36 -87. Height of Buildings. No single- or two- family dwelling shall exceed a height of 35 feet. unless the. city council .approves a conditional use permit. Section 36- 119(h). Height regulation. No R -3A multiple dwelling shall exceed a height of 35 feet or three stories, unless the city council approves a conditional use permit. thillpty 9-EX, ' -bail U . Section 36- 122(h). Height regulation. No R -313 multiple dwelling shall exceed a height of 35 feet or three f-33 stories unless the city council approves a mess -10-01 conditional use permit. , tao , 61q- 6120kni Of 5 Section 36- 124(1). Height regulation. N— C multiple dwellina shall exceed a height of 35 feet or three stories, unless the city council approves a conditional use permit. 40-6co—PI WO • Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. The Maplewood City Council passed this ordinance on the day of 9 1998. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes — Nays — 2 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JULY 20, 1998 V.. NEW BUSINESS C. Residential Building Height Code Amendment Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Trippler asked why staff picked the average height of the highest gable of a pitch as opposed to the top of the building. Commissioner Rossbach it would be unfair if you were going to build a flat roof that you can be this tall but if you are. going to put a pitched roof on your house, you are essentially penalizing those people and saying that the inner living space of their house has to be much shorter if they are going to put a pitched roof on their house. You would actually be encouraging people who wanted a bigger building to put flat roofs on their house which, of course, is not a good thing to do in Minnesota. Commissioner Trippler said the word "average" grade troubles him, in that, if you have somebody who is a statistician come in they may pick the mode which is not what you had in mind. You might want to use, instead of average, median or mean. Staff said that was fine and that it would be more technically correct. Commissioner Ledvina asked if a icture might be worthwhile with this ordinance which would tell P g how the height was measured. Staff said that there might be people this would help. Commissioner Ledvina asked if we were changing how we measure the height of accessory structures. Staff said that no this was not the intent. Commissioner Thompson said he thought this revision was the point that the applicant brought out p g about the rear of the house being the issue there and in other cases. We are still going to save the front of the house. Commissioner Thompson said that to him they had lost the whole thrust when they put the front of the house in there because the rear of the house was the issue in this home. Staff said the front was the issue because the front had three full stories. Staff said in most cases the rear is the walkout or the most exposed. Staff said they didn't think this code amendment would have helped the case that started the discussion. Commissioner Rossbach said that this height could have accommodated the house in question, too even measured in the front. If Y ou have three floors and even if you allowed nine feet of height and then your one foot above grade and your one foot for each of the floors in between, would only 9 p brie it u to 30 feet and this home did not have a real steep pitched roof. Commissioner Rossbach said that 35 feet was tall enough and that this house would have been accommodated. Commissioner Fischer asked staff if any of the communities they talked to have the equivalent of our estate size lots and did they any differentiations in the allowable heights on those larger Y lots where the impact might not be as much on the neighbor as it would on a normal size lot. Staff P g said the only g g two cities that have larger lot zoning are Woodbury and White Bear Township. Staff said when they were reviewing the Woodbury code that it didn't differentiate height. Commissioner Rossbach asked if the code book can't have something that says residential structures in Maplewood will be this tall with the exception of the shore land district, instead of five or six different ones. Melinda Coleman, director of community development, said that at this point in time it was easier to do it this way but in the future staff will be redoing all of Section 36 and that would be a good time to do away with some of the overlapping. Commissioner Rossbach asked how come we re9u . late the height of residential structures and we don't regulate the height of commercial structures. Staff said there are some limitations on commercial structures in that they . have to be set back farther from residential districts. Staff said that a g couple of months ago the council had staff do a. review to make sure that we didn't restrict P commercial building heights. Commissioner Frost moved that the planning commission recommend the city council adopt the code amendments revisin g the residential building height requirements. Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Commissioner Tri ler asked if a modification was going to be made to the word average, qualified Pp as saying mean or median. Staff said they thought it should be median and had made a note of it. Ayes —all The motion passed. t AGENDA ITEM TJ AGENDA REPORT Action b • y C ounc i l: Endorsed TO: City Manager Modified_�� Rejected....„_ FROM: City Engineer Date SUBJECT: Little Canada Water Charge - 2860 Arcade Street DATE: August 17, 1998 At the last city council meeting Fred Wegscheider requested the city council to help defray the connection charge Little Canada proposes for his water connection. The city council had a number of questions regarding Mr. Wegscheider's property and it's history as it relates to water charges. A search of the records indicate that Mr. Wegscheider and his neighbors involved in this project have paid a water tower assessment and have been charged the city's hydrant charge. In other words the subject properties have been treated the same as any other property in Maplewood as it relates to water charges in the past. The question still remains how much should the City of Maplewood contribute towards the cash connection charge imposed by Little Canada. One scenario was outlined in the previous staff report and is attached for reference. Another option might be as follows; for residential property that have paid an assessment and the city's hydrant charge in the past, Maplewood should pay a connection charge imposed by a neighboring community. This would be similar to what Maplewood does on it's own projects, since the city typically finances the trunk cost through the water fund. The only additional charge still outstanding is Maplewood's water availability charge which is imposed on residential properties at the time of hook up. This charge currently is $150.00. If this second option is chosen by the city council, Mr. Wegscheider would be reimbursed the $3,138.94 Little Canada hook up charge less the $150.00 water availability charge for the City of Maplewood resulting in a total reimbursement of $2988.94. It is recommended the city council receive comment on this issue and take action based on the staff report and testimony,, KGH jt attachment AGENDA ITEM K ?io-a AGENDA REPORT Action by Council: TO: City Manager Endorsed FROM: City Engineer Modif i e 3 Re ecte SUBJECT: Little Canada Water Charge, 2860 Arcade Street Date DATE: August 3, 1998 As part of the Arcade Street project north of Keller Parkway, water was installed to i Y service homes n Little Canada and Maplewood along the street. The City of Maplewood assessed $3,400.00 per unit for the installation cost of the water. This is comparable to the charge for water main on other Maplewood projects. It has come to light that Little Canada will also charge a connection charge to the Maplewood residents along Arcade Street. This is a long-standing. fee that Little Canada charges property owners outside their city limits. It represents a fee comparable to the property tax paid by Little Canada residents for the trunk portion of p their water system. The City of Little Canada has used general tax le to finance a big g share of their water system costs. They feel it is only fair to charge outside residents an amount similar to the taxes paid by Little Canada property owners. The City of Maplewood finances its trunk system in a different fashion. In Maplewood the trunk costs are typically financed through the hydrant charge. Since other Maplewood residents have benefited from the city picking up these excess water costs it seems reasonable that the city should contribute to the Little Canada hookup char . p e g 'for our residents. One method of determining the amount of subsidy is as follows: The lot in questions has 130 front feet. If the city's cash connection charge policy f $35.00 i Y per front foot s applied, the total cost to the property would be $4,550.00. The combined water charge of $3,400.00 for Maplewood and $3,138.94 for Little Canada totals $6,538.94. It seems appropriate that Ma Maplewood could make u the difference p p between. these two numbers, or $2,000.00. It is recommended the city council receive comment on this issue and take action based on the staff report and testimony. KG H jC To Ken Haider: From: Fred Wegscheider 2860 Arcade St. Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Re: City Water Access Charge Dear Ken: We are writing to ask the City of Maplewood for some relief on the Water Access Charge to hookup city water. We live in the City of Maplewood and there are no provisions to hookup city water in Maplewood. Little Canada is charging a water access charge of $3138.94 to hook into their system. We have already been assessed $3400.40 for the water portion of a $7800:00 assessment fee charged this year. We were never told prior to my assessment or even prior to the approval of the Arcade St. improvement project. If this would have been a City of Maplewood project the hookup permit would of been much less. We have been residents of Maplewood for the past twenty four years in which we have paid taxes. If we could plead our case to the city council if this is not approved it would be greatly appreciated. We look forward to hearing from you on this matter and anything you could do for us would be appreciated. Fraternally, Fred Wegscheider AGENDA NO. K 1 Action by Council: AGENDA REPORT Endorsed Modified Rejected Bat TO: Cit Mana FROM: Finance Director 4 RE: 1999 PROPOSED BUDGET DATE: Au 17, 1998 Attached is a press release on the Proposed 1998 Bud Details on the bud are in the booklet which is scheduled to be distributed this week. In order to compl with the provisions of the Truth in Taxation law, the Council must adopt a Proposed 1999 Bud and proposed tax lev pa in 1999 to September 15. It has been past practice to have a special Council meetin to review the proposed bud durin Au or September. Last y ear the meetin lasted approximatel 2 %hours. Based upon a review of schedules, the best date for a meetin is Monda Au 31. It is recommended that the Council schedule a special meetin on this date to review the Proposed 1998 Bud P:\F1NANCE\WP\AGN\99BUDMET.WPD PRESS RELEASE 1999 PROPOSED BUDGET -CITY OF MAPLEWOOD The City Manager has accomplished a top objective of the Maplewood city Council: no increase in the city's tax levy for 1999. The 1999 Proposed Budget prepared under the direction of Michael McGuire, City Manager, recommends a tax levy for 1999 of $7.4 million. This is the third consecutive year that the tax levy has been held at this amount. It is the result of a budget preparation process that involves close scrutiny of proposed expenditures and a constant search for non -tax revenues. Non -tax revenues scheduled for the largest increases in 1999 are ambulance and sewer service charges. Ambulance rates are planned to increase by 7% in order to keep Maplewood rates comparable to the 1998 rates charged by other providers and to decrease the property tax subsidy for ambulance services. This is especially important because about one -third of our ambulance customers are non- residents. Sewer rates will need to be increased by 25.6% to finance the 1999 Budget. Most of the revenues from the sewer rates finance the Metropolitan Council sewage treatment charges to Maplewood which will be 74.6% of the operating expenses for the Sanitary Sewer Fund in 1999. The large increase in sewer rates is necessary to compensate for the reduction in revenues that began July 1, 1997. This was when the residential rates were revised from flat rates to a flow -based rate. Sewer charge revenues needed for the 1999 Budget are $3.5 million which is 25.6% higher than the 1998 projection. However, it is important to note that the amount needed for 1999 is only 13% higher than the 1996 sewer charge revenues. Utility bills on an average home will increase by $10.20 per quarter. The 1999 Proposed Budget will maintain the level of services provided by all departments. Proposed expenditures for operations in 1999 are $23.4 million which is 3.6% more than 1998. This is higher than the anticipated inflation rate for 1999 because of city growth in population that has averaged 1.8% annually over the past three years. The number of full -time employees included in the 1999 Budget is 145. This is an increase of one due to an additional street maintenance position in the Public Works Department. The increase is primarily due to the transfer of streets from Ramsey county to the City as a part of the re- jurisdiction program that we agreed to. All of the turn -back mileage is eligible for additional state aid of approximately $52,000. This additional aid will pay for the cost of the additional street maintenance position. Proposed 1999 expenditures for capital improvements are $1.2 million which is 38.5% less than 1998. This portion of the budget covers the acquisition and construction of major facilities other than those financed by the operating Budget. Proposed 1999 expenditures for debt service are $3.6 million which is 51.4% less than 1998. This portion of the budget covers the payment of principal and interest on the City's bonded indebtedness. The total proposed 1999 expenditures for operations, capital improvements and debt service are $28.9 million which is 12.7% less than 1998. PAMNANCEMMAGNW9BUDPREAPD AGENDA ITEM KZ AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer Action by Council: Endorsed Modified.... Re J ected,...- ..,,.. Date SUBJECT: No Parking Trunk Highway 61; Gervais Avenue to Connor Avenue DATE: August 17, 1998 Recently it has become popular to display cars, boats, and motorcycles for sale along the frontage road on the west side of Highway 61. This has caused a number of problems for drivers trying to use this road. Cars on display typically take u art of the Y Y Y pp paved surface and those shopping for cars park in the middle of the street and cause dangerous situations. Staff has recently installed temporary "No Parking" signs because of the emergency situation. We have also mailed a survey to property owners along the street. Seven of the property owners have responded that establishing a no parking zone from Gervais Avenue to Connor Avenue along the west frontage road is a reasonable proposal. The staff recommends the city council establish a no parking zone along the west Highway 61 frontage road from Gervais Avenue to Connor Avenue, KG H jt AGENDA ITEM K 3 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer �� SUBJECT: 2416 Teakwood Drive - Drainage DATE: August 17, 1998 Action by Counoil i Endorsed Modified,,,, Rejected Date—.,_.,,. L Richard and Antonia Morgan at 2416 Teakwood Drive have had a drainage concern for a number of years. I have attached some correspondence from 1993 as reference. The Morgans assert that the grading on their neighbor's lot at 451 Marnie causes a wet basement and may damage their pool. Staff has reviewed this situation a number of times. At this time we draw the same conclusion that the grading on the adjacent lot is not extraordinary and should not be causing the problems the Morgans report. The neighbor's home has gutters, downspouts, and a collection system that pipes the roof runoff directly to the street. The area south and north of the home directs the drainage away from the Morgan property. There is a small turf area behind the neighbor's property that drains towards the Morgan's backyard. Staff considers this a pervious area that generates limited runoff. It is not uncommon for small parts of a neighbor's yard to drain across the property line. The Morgans have a second concern along their west property line. At this location a ditch conveys drainage southerly across several yards. The Morgans assert that the neighbor to the south has filled in the ditch causing water to pool on their property. The ditch has a very flat grade and indeed it appears that through lands n cnmA minor changes in the ditch grade have occured south of the Morgan property. Staff does not consider this a major problem since the filling seems to have been inadvertent on the part of the neighbor. There does not appear to be any danger threatening the Morgan's home because of this situation. KGH jt attachment 44 H OMEGUAR D INSPECTION SERVICES, INC. October 4 .,1993 Cory I lac�t�ii,�n David Chaplilml Rich ard and 'Yoni Mo 2416 Teakwood Drive Maplewood, MN 55119 471.E S. Snelling RE: 24165 Teakwood Drive, Maplewood Avenue St. Paul, Minnes Dear Richard and Tani, 55105 Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed y our concerns with the exterior grading at • the lot lines of your home. 612 -099 -3197 Fax: 612 -699-0857 OBS ERVATIONS S ATIONS 1) On the east side, the nei hbors' and slop to the west without a ,., � Y p t swale to divert_ water to the north or south. /)RD Buyer's /Seller's Inspections a) Most community oi11n1 reg p rohibit on ' Y � g� p year Cronin draining onto another yard. Verify with the City of Maplewood regarding zoning regulations. Trut1i in 1-lousing b Drainage easements along the lot lines are typically designated p rior to tine City � na p Y approval of a development Verify wi the City w here the d ra inage easements are loc- - x for your lot. A plot plan or survey should be available from the city. 2) On the west side, the soil along he west lot line has low areas and has caused sed grass to die out. Expert Witness Reports y a) The south a djoin ing lot is slightly h i g her than your lot. Verify drain easeme g Y g � y g e t Educational Programs along the west side on the surrey or plot plan. RECOMMENDATIONS 1) In order to correct the grading and drainage at the east and west lot lines, the f� adjoining lots will need re-grad Let our experience a) Along the east, all water should drain to the north. work for Jvrt b) Along the west, all water should drain to tine south. 2416 Teakwood Drive Page 2 RECOMMENDATION S - coil thiu e d 2) Review of the City t a e draina easements and buildill -zunin r ' �.' €; �; e�ula tlUllS 1S llec'eSSa to deterlilllle specifically what the City of Maplewood requires. 3) Review the drainage and zoning uiremerlts and actual conditions � � with the Maplewood Director of Community Development to detemimin what responsibility the City has to enforce � p Y Y zolllilg easemeIit regulatimis. 4) Failure to correct the drainage alon the. east side may have an adverse affe ' �' y E'c.t OIl your SW1I11I111I1g pool due to water pressure al aitlst the wall. Com ider d ra ftiftig the water alld cliec T b,e lliiid the liner at the eiist side to det e nnitie if the willi is c:ra ckcad or deteriorated. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you. Please feel free to call witll an uestions regarding his ins ec+tiotl r eport. re Y � P p Si ly ary L. Hartman HolneGuard Inspection Services, Inc. AV t Attorneys Anne Serp= Managing A-Uomq Eriue L Valen Jessie K Spire UjAW.-FORD LEGAL SERVICES KLAN Suite 235 Ylrtght Building 2233 University Avenue SL PAUI, Minnesota 551.14 (612) 841 -0647 FAX: (612) 6464191 October 27, 19 9 3 City of Maplewood Department of Engineering 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55119 RE: Our Clients: Richard and Antonia Morgan 2416 Teakwood Drive Maplewood, MN 55119 To Whoa It May Concern: 1 have been retained by Richard and Antonia Morgan re ardin 9 problems which they are experiencin g g due to water run -off from an adjoining property. It is any understanding that a representative from your office has been out to inspect their property and found that the situation complied with local codes and ordinances. Earlier this month a private inspector was sent to my clients' property to review the situation. He concluded that on the east side, the neighbor's yard sloped to the west without a sway le to divert water to the north or south. The water run -off onto my clients' property is causing problems with their lawn as well as potential damage to their swimming pool. I would appreciate if you would provide me with a record as to what conclusions were drawn by your inspector, as well as copies of relevant ordinances or regulations, which pertain to this type of situation. Thank you for your cooperation regarding this matter. Very sincerely yours, Bruce L. Valen Attorney at Law blv /reb cc: Richard and Antonia Morgan fIr bk .i i J CITY OF C:r' 01 Y -,S M A P 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B : JAPLEWOOD, MINNESCUA 55109 r DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS h12.< 0 -4550 December 9, 1993 Bruce L. Vallen UAW -Ford Legal .Services Plan Suite 235, Wright Building 2233 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 RICHARD AND ANTONIA MORGAN - 2416 TEAKWOOD DRIVE i have visited the site with the city inspector. I agree with his conclusion that the grading on the property east of your clients home is appropriate. Only a small portion of the back yard drains towards your clients' property. The impervious area created by the home and the driveway all drain to the street and is not affecting adjacent properties. These are no relevant ordinances or regulations that pertain to this particular situation. The inspector uses his best judgment, and in this case I concur. Please call me at 770 - 4550 if you wish to discuss this matter further. KENNETH G. RAIDER -CITY ENGINEER jC &Itual ( pporttutitV 1;mploycr Attorneys Anne Bergman Managing Attorney Bruce L. Valen Jessie Spire. Carlson Richard and Antonia Morgan 2416 Teakwood Dr. Maplewood, MN 55112 December 13, 1993 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Morgan: Enclosed please find correspondence recently received from the City of Maplewood. Obviously the City has taken the opposite position of G Hartman. The legal cause of �'Y g action which you have against your neighbor would be for a trespass. In order to calculate your damages, it would be necessary for ou ou to have a landscaper provide Y P P Y with an estimate as to what the costs would be to remedy the drainage problem. I would suggest .that you obtain an estimate after the snow melts. At that time we can meet to review your situation and proceed accordingly. Very sincerely yours, �l Bruce L. Va1en Attorney at Law Enclosures UAW -FORD LEGAL SERVICES PLAN Suite 235 Wight Building 2233 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 (612) 641 -0647 FAX: (612) 646 -4191 blv /reb Agenda K 1 TO: Michael A. McGu FROM: Bruce K. Andersc SUBJECT: Open Space Gra - eation DATE: August 6, 1998 for the August 24, 1998 City Council Meeting BACKGROUND Action by Council: Endorse modifi ed...,. Rej eeted,... Datte The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Department in cooperation with Natural Resources Restoration has received a $20,000 grant from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The grant is a 1998 Conservation Partners grant program application which requires a $10,000 match from the City of Maplewood: The city will match the grant with open space monies that were allocated by the City Council in 1997 for the restoration of open space properties. The grant will accomplish the following four objectives: 1. Removal of non - native woody species at three open space properties covering 30 acres. This will be done in cooperation with the "Sentence to Serve" program, which we've received another joint grant for working with prison inmates. 2. Controlled burn of three open space properties involving 75 acres. We have done three open space burns in the past year and had great success (at Wakefield, Frost and English and Jim's Prairie.) 3. The grant will provide for trash cleanup of all open space properties involving at least 100 acres, in cooperation with the "Sentence to Serve" program. 4. Planting of natural vegetation for at least 10 acres involving a variety of species, of which I've included the planting list for your edification. The city has money to match the grant and the additional monies, in cooperative efforts with the "Sentence to Serve" program, will greatly expand our open space restoration efforts. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council formally approve acceptance of the 1998 Conservation Partners grant program application in the amount of $10,000. kMosgrant. mem MEMORANDUM OF M1 NNFsp Minnesota Department of Natural Resources rn w 9 J � OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 500 Lafayette Road OFNATUap St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -4037 July 16, 1998 Mr. Craig Andresen Owner, Natural Resources Restoration 2013 Walnut Ave NW New Brighton, MN 55112 RE: 1998 Conservation Partners Grant Program Application Grant amount: $10,000 Maplewood Open Space Restoration Dear Mr. Andresen: I am pleased to inform you that your application for the Conservation Partners grant program has been selected for funding. We anticipate being able to offer you a grant for the amount shown above contingent upon the final processing of your application. Final processing of your grant requires submittal of additional information which must be completed in a timely manner. You will be contacted shortly by a staff member from the Local Grants Program regarding the final processing requirements for your application. DO NOT incur any project costs. This notice does not constitute final approval of your project. Any work completed, money spent, or obligations incurred for development of your project prior to final approval are ineligible and cannot be paid for with grant funds or used as the local share. The Local Grants Program staff are looking forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions, call Wayne Sames at 296 -1567. Congratulations! Yours truly, s Rodney W. Sando Commissioner c. Kathleen Wallace, Region Administrator DNR Information: 612 -296 -6157, 1 -800- 766 -6000 • TTY: 612- 296 -5484, 1- 800 - 657 -3929 • FAX: 612- 296 -4799 An Equal Opportunity Employer ^ Printed on Recycled Paper to Containing 10% Post - Consumer Waste MAPLEWOOD April 27, 1 998 Craig Andresen Natural resources restoration 2013 Walnut Avenue N.W. New Brighton, MN 55112 Dear Craig: Thank you for taking the time to rreet and discuss the eleven Maplewood Open Space System. it Is exciting to be taking the next step to develop our open space parcels. The City of Maplewood has been a leader in acquisition and planning for natural areas. The open space system, consisting of neariy 200 acres, includes same wonderful natural resources. At the same tune, there is much room for enhancing and preserving the integrity of the open space system with careful planning and sound management practices. None of the sites are in pristine condition. Each of the open space parcels are af by the invasion of non - native species and intrLsions by man. The goals for our open space program include both preservation and enhancement of natural areas in the city. With the help of our ci zens (Open Space Committee, Parks and Recreation Cornn�on, Technkcal Advisory Task Force, City Council), we have acquired and preserved several open spaces. The next step is to solicit technical .assistance to restore these parcels. In 1 993, the City of Maplewood broke ground by making a serious comment too s e. Since then, other communities have also recognized the need for natural area preservation. We are now on the threshold of taking the next step toward developing a quality open space system. A QNR gwt to remove invasive species and re- establish of native prairie grasses is the next step. Your ;dentified work plan will achieve that goal. The City supports this application and will match funds with budgeted dollars for natural area r n. Based on your excellent record at Wakefield Park and Frost/English op sp the whole heartedl Pe � Ch' Y supports Natural resources Restorations efforts to continue developing he M lewood open s g � pe pac e program. We look forward to worlang with you regarding open space work plans for 1 998. Please call me with any questions at 770 -4573. PARKS & RE D EP ARTMENT 612 - 770 - 4570 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1 830 EAST C OUNTY ROAD S MAP LEWOOD. MN 55109 Cit of Maplewood Open Space Restoration 1998 Conservation Partner Grant Request The City of Maplewood has made a serious commitment to purchasin remainin open space within the communit Almost two hundred acres have been purchased in eleven parcels to date and more are planned. This effort was insti b citizens and lead to a referendum in 1993 for bondin funds. Maplewood has been the leader in the seven count metropolitan area in this re Most cit officials are currentl in favor of mana the open space parcels in an environmentall friendl manner. Studies and some implementation efforts are underwa for the restoration of native plant communities with minimal development on these sites. A g rant from the Minnesota Conservation Partners Grant Pro would help advance the current strategy within cit g overnment to �.' -&- hin the cit y . - continue the experiment of restoration Tait Althou the sites are disturbed and exotics are present, there is an opportunit for the state to partner with a leader and showcase the efforts of Maplewood. The funds would be used for the control of exotic species, controlled burns, site clean up and plantin of native ve on the recentl ac open space sites. The cit is within the Anoka Sand Plain and restoration activities will con of restorin prairie and oak savanna ve 0 Itesa 3 •Total Projwt Cost Describe each project component using specific such as number of acres, length of shoreline, or aanmber of trees planned. Determine the cost of each component. The cost includes the cash you will spend and the market value of donated supplies, equipment and tabor needed to produce the component. Volunteer labor is valued at up to $5.00/br. If any person working on your project will charge more ftn $20. attach a letter describin g the task they will perform, their qualifications, hourly rate to be charged. and evidence they have received trus hourly rate for s ar work in the past. The grant can be used to reimburse your org tion for up to one half the cost for each component. Use this table or attach your own, component cost 3 s: s or woo aa1 e 3 7'r o r1 01�e S .3 7 a cress s 3 a t /00 a.ro s � o PJ & A A ft D ES P f% 41, -&4*-w-. an rd S s Total Project Case [value of matching contribution + Scant Amds] 000 " r 3 Planting List Complete and attach this form for any projects that involve planting. Projects that emphasize native species are encouraged. Qty Species Size Native to Supplier (botanical and common names) project area? Y/N SO- L � c 4. 2. a Cri% 6 200 -k.& �� %p ZooLA Si L Soo��►� —o a e,. /Y y s � •�.,•4 � -r�s�s d �, , , 5 �a 4 4.41 o s •� v S ss. b. Lou; tar 3 a �yt o ftJ � Lssp e af e z, a G ° ip 16. roan G/ v { ,(��f M o Je u wk G i n a v 1 6 . S howr is See c� J /00 ra; r:t %S pa 'f �► so% VCxs o spa.: a s a. 1 6 J"re>d d o 4 /% aL Q.. S/I/