HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005 12-12 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, December 12, 2005
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 05 -28
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Acknowledgement of Maplewood Residents Serving the Country
C. ROLL CALL
Mayor's Address on Protocol:
"Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council. It is our desire to keep all discussions civil as we work through
difficult issues tonight. If you are here for a Public Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with the
Policies and Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. When you address the council, please state
your name and address clearly for the record. All comments /questions shall be posed to the Mayor and Council. 1 then will
direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments."
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes from the City Council Meeting- November 28, 2005
Minutes from the Special City Council Meeting- December 5, 2005
E. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
F. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
G. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
H. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a
member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered
separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Ordinance to Increase Planning Fees (Second Reading)
3. Increase in Miscellaneous Service Charges
4. Transfers for Unassessed Improvements
5. Assessments for False Alarm Bills
6. Assessments for Ambulance Bills
7. Write Off Uncollectible Ambulance Bills for 2003
8. Designation of Depositories for Investments
9. Budget Adjustments for 2005 Bond Issue
10. Maplewood Fire Relief Association Transfer of Assets to Oakdale Fire Relief Association
11. Gladstone North Area Streets Improvements— City Project 04 -15
a. Resolution for Modification of Existing Construction Contract, Change
Order No. 1
12. Maplewood Recycling Program — Approve Distribution of Advertisement Materials
13. 2006 Temporary/Casual Part -time Pay Resolution
14. Conditional Use Permit Review — Schlomka Landscaping (2511 Carver Avenue)
15. Annual License Lawful Gambling — Pioneer Booster Club at Bleecher's Bar
16. Diseased Tree Program- Report on 2005 Removals
17. Tax - Exempt Financing Request - Hill Murray School (2625 Larpenteur Avenue East)
18. Ambulance Rates for 2006
19. Budget Adjustment for Nature Center Donation
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Kenwood Area Street Improvements — City Project 05 -16
a. Public Hearing
b. Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing
Intoxicating Liquor License Fee Increase
Proposed 2006 Budget and Tax Levy
K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Roselawn Traffic Issues (35E to Rice) — City Project 05 -25 — Review of Traffic
Engineer's Findings
L. NEW BUSINESS
Maplewood Mall Area Transportation Improvements Project Financing Summary and
Budget Adjustments
a. Hazelwood Street Improvements (C to Beam), City Project 01 -16
b. County Road D East (TH 61 to Southlawn), City Project 02 -07
C. County Road D West (TH 61 to Highridge), City Project 02 -08
d. Kennard Street Improvements (Beam to Cty Rd D), City Project 03 -04
e. TH 61 Improvements (Beam to 1 -694), City Project 03 -07
f. County Road C Area Streets, City Project 03 -18
g. Legacy Parkway (Kennard to Hazelwood), City Project 03 -26
h. Hazelwood Street (Beam to D), City Project 03 -39
i. Bruce Vento Trail Extension (Beam to Buerkle), City Project 04 -02
j. County Road D Court , City Project 04 -06
k. TH 61 East Frontage Road (New Cty D to Old Cty D), City Project 04 -25
Reduced Front Yard Setback Request — Detached Garage (1948 Kenwood Drive)
Easement Vacation — Legacy Village (west of Southlawn Drive, south of Legacy
Parkway)
Tire View Estate Preliminary Plat (east of Highway 61 at new County Road D)
Regions Sleep Health Center (2688 Maplewood Drive North)
a. Conditional Use Permit
b. Building Setback Variance
C. Zoning Map Change — R -1 (single dwellings) to M -1 (light manufacturing)
d. Design Approval
Afton Heights Park Wetland Restoration Order
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
Reminder- December 26, 2005 Meeting Cancelled
161 il11!,16111N0
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request.
The request for this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at
(651) 249 -2001 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City
Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings-
elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard
and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is
understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep
emotions in check and use respectful language.
DRAFT -- MINUTES Agenda Item D1
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, November 28, 2005
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 05 -26
U
1 -1
C.
La
CALL TO ORDER:
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the City Hall, and was called to
order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
1:2 4 4 BIC] Nrelffil 4 4 MM Fi lL,IN=
ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
David Bartol, Councilmember Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present
Will Rossbach. Councilmember Present
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes from the City Council /Manager Workshop- November 14, 2005
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the minutes from the November 14, 2005 City
Council /Manager Workshop as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All
2. Minutes from the City Council Meeting- November 14, 2005
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the minutes from the November 14, 2005 City Council
Meeting as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All
3. Special City Council Meeting- November 17, 2005
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the minutes from the November 17, 2005 Special City
Council meeting as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach
Ayes -Mayor Cardinal,
Councilmembers Bartol, Juenemann and
Rossbach
Abstain - Councilmember Koppen
�9 »:ISITI 1 Se] ffiw ;10 11
M1. Food Shelf Program
Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the agenda as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
City Council 11 -28 -05
1
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
None
G. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Claims
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 5,254.78 Manual Checks # 68445 thru # 68447
dated 11/04/05 thru 11/08/05
$ 2,140.63 EFT # 68448
dated 11115105
$ 1,501,654.91 Checks # 68449 thru # 68525
dated 11115105
$ 260,616.44 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 11/04/05 thru 11/09/05
$ 650.00 Manual Checks # 68526
dated 11/16/05
$ 158,493.96 Checks # 68527 thru # 68581
dated 11/22/05
$ 3,793,194.45 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 11110105 thru 11/17/05
$ 5,722,005.17 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
$ 478,336.89 11/18/05
$ 2,449.75
Payroll Deduction check # 103340 thru # 103343
dated 11/18/05
$ 480,786.64 Total Payroll
$ 6,202,791.81 GRAND TOTAL
City Council 11 -28 -05 2
Increase in Community Development Department Service Charges
Approved the following increase in the following Community Development Department fees
effective January 1, 2006, and approved the first reading of the following ordinance to
increase planning fees:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Service Charges
Estimated
Fee
Annual
2004
2005
2006
Volume
Fee
Fee
Fee
PLANNING FEES (Set by Ordinance)
Zone Change *
8
788
952
1,128
Conditional Use Permit:
R1 and R2 *
1
236
487
742
Other*
11
838
989
1,153
Conditional Use Permit Revision:
R1 and R2 *
6
47
338
630
Other*
8
168
479
793
Variances:
R1 and R2 *
6
154
391
630
Other*
6
862
947
1,046
Front Yard Setback *
1
154
225
298
Vacations:
R1 and R2 '
10
148
150
153
Other*
2
576
583
595
Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created):
R1 and R2
11
82
83
85
Other
1
307
311
317
Home Occupations
Initial Permit
6
168
401
637
Annual Renewal
6
55
56
57
Sign Erection Permit (per inspection)
100
24
24
24
Temporary Sign Permit
30
24
28
32
City Council 11 -28 -05
Wall Sign Permit
50
24
40
56
Free Standing Signs
13
24
53
82
Comprehensive Plan Amendment *
8
1,148
1,247
1,364
Code Amendment
1
862
873
890
Planned Unit Development*
8
1,270
1,531
1,812
Preliminary Plat
8
1,420
1,518
1,636
Preliminary Plat Revision or Time
Extension
9
224
227
232
Final Plat
5
386
391
399
Time Extensions /Renewals
9
141
143
146
LICENSES DUE JANUARY 1st
Commercial Fertilizer Application
License
114
115
117
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES
Woodlot Alteration Permit
1
14
14
14
Building Relocation
5
823
834
851
Moving Permit
3
53
54
55
Community Design Review Board:
R1 & R2
15 Day Design Review
Revision
Other
8
1
3
16
190
154
0
693
456
216
190
702
725
280
194
716
Mobile Home Permit
1
41
42
43
On -Site Sewage Systems
6
67
68
69
Truth -In- Housing Filing Fee
100
31
31
32
Truth -In- Housing Evaluators License
29
106
107
109
Zoning Compliance Letter
24
24
24
Project Notification Sign
12
100
101
103
Front Yard Setback Authorization
0
154
157
Minor Construction Project
0
154
157
PUBLICATIONS (Includes Sales Tax):
Zoning Code
6
6
6
Platting Code
3
3
3
City Council 11 -28 -05
Sign Code
1,128
3
3
3
Comprehensive Plan
Other
15
15
15
Zoning Map
630
11
11
11
City Map
R1 & R2
3
3
3
Section Map
298
3
3
3
Planning Commission or Community
Design Review Board:
Minutes - Per Year
Agenda Packet - Per Year
Property Owner List
Other
15
114
66
15
115
67
15
117
68
R1 & R2
85
Other
317
Home Occupation Permit (initial permit)
Ordinance No. 848
PLANNING FEES
Section 1. Section 36 - 26 of the Zoning Code of the City of Maplewood is hereby amended as follows:
Section 36 - 26. Fees. The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required:
Zone Change
1,128
Conditional Use Permit:
R1 & R2
742
Other
1,153
Conditional Use Permit Revision:
R1 & R2
630
Other
793
Variances:
R1 & R2
630
Other
1,046
Front Yard Setback
298
Vacations:
R1 & R2
153
Other
595
Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created):
R1 & R2
85
Other
317
Home Occupation Permit (initial permit)
Initial permit
637
Annual permit
57
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
1,364
City Council 11 -28 -05 5
Code Amendment
890
Planned Unit Development
1,812
Preliminary Plat
1,636
Preliminary Plat Revision or Time Extension
232
Final Plat
399
Time Extensions /Renewals
146
Section 2. Section 36 - 258 of the sign code is amended as follows:
Section 36 - 258. Fees.
(1) The sign erection permit fee shall be $24 (per inspection)
Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective on January 1, 2006
Conditional Use Permit Review — Jiffy Lube (3071 White Bear Avenue)
Approved to review the conditional use permit for the Jiffy Lube automobile maintenance
garage at 3071 White Bear Avenue (near Maplewood Mall) again in one year or sooner
if a problem arises or if the owner proposes a significant change to the site.
Conditional Use Permit Termination — Sandy Lake Soccer Center (County Road B, west
of I -35E)
Adopted the following resolution terminating the conditional use permit for the Sandy
Lake Soccer Fields due to the City of St. Paul Parks and Recreation Department no
longer planning to build on this facility:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TERMINATION RESOLUTION 05 -11 -172
WHEREAS, the City of St. Paul received approval from the Maplewood City Council on March 10,
2003, for a conditional use permit allowing them to construct the Sandy Lake Soccer Complex.
WHEREAS, The City of St. Paul subsequently notified the City of Maplewood in July, 2005 that
they no longer plan to build this soccer facility and have no need for this conditional use permit.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located on the south side of County Road B East,
west of Interstate 35E. The legal description is:
Parcel #18- 29 -22 -12 -0010: South 140" of North 270' of E 442', 68/100'. North 130' of SW '/a of
NE '/a subject to County Road B part of NW '/a of NE '/a S.E.LY of 160' W.W. R/W in SECTION 18,
TOWN 29, RANGE 22.
Parcel #18- 29 -22 -24 -0024: Subject to Avenue; except South 15' of East 320' of West 1790' of
NW '/a ex. Part in James 1 Addition part of said NW ''/4, S.E.LY of W.W. R/W in SECTION 18,
TOWN 29, RANGE 22.
City Council 11 -28 -05
Parcel #18- 29 -22 -24 -0001: SECTION 18, TOWN 29, RANGE 22. 100' W.W. R/W across N 2/3
of SW ''/4. 165' W.W. R/W across S '/a of NW ''/4. 160' W.W. R/W across N % of E '/ of NW ' / 4 of
SECTION 18, TOWN 29, RANGE 22.
Parcel #18- 29 -22 -12 -0009: SECTION 18, TOWN 29, RANGE 22. 160' W.W R/W across NW ' / 4
of NE '/a of SECTION 18, TOWN 29, RANGE 22.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit termination is as follows:
1. On November 28, 2005, the city council terminated this conditional use permit since the
applicant, the City of St. Paul Parks and Recreation Department, no longer has plans to build this
soccer facility.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council terminate the above - described
conditional use permit because the City of St. Paul no longer has plans to construct this soccer
facility.
2006 Landfall Policing Contract
Approved the following policing contract between the City of Maplewood and City of
Landfall:
AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE POLICE SERVICE
This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 20_, by and between the City of
Maplewood, a Minnesota Municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Maplewood" and the City of
Landfall Village, a Minnesota Municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Landfall ".
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to provide the basis upon which Maplewood will provide police service for
Landfall. Maplewood hereby agrees to provide police service for Landfall, and Landfall hereby engages
Maplewood to provide such service in accordance with and subject to the terms of this Agreement.
II. LEGAL BASIS
This Agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §471.59, Subd. 12. This Agreement is not made
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 436.06, and should not be construed as creating a joint municipal
police department.
III. ADMINISTRATION
The administration of police service within the territory of Landfall under this Agreement shall be the sole
responsibility of the appropriate officials of Maplewood, and Landfall shall have no administrative authority
over the providing of police service by Maplewood. To facilitate this Agreement, however, and in order to
provide for an average of consultation and communication between Landfall and Maplewood, on matters
relating to police service, it is agreed that the Mayor of Landfall, or a member of the Landfall City Council
designated by the Mayor, shall confer with the Maplewood City Manager or designee at least once every
three months, and more frequently if necessary, on any matter relating to police service being provided in
Landfall by Maplewood. Maplewood agrees that its City Manager or designee shall participate in such
discussions with the objective of providing for the satisfactory administration of this contract and for the
satisfactory performance of police service for Landfall. Inquiries concerning police service in Landfall,
made by its Mayor or the Mayor's designate, shall be responded to by the Maplewood City Manager or
designee.
City Council 11 -28 -05
IV. LEVEL OF SERVICE
During the time that this contract is in effect, Maplewood will provide police service within Landfall which
shall be the same service as that which is provided and extended to persons and property within
Maplewood, including Animal Control Services. Landfall shall be assigned to a police patrol district in the
same manner as though it were a part of Maplewood and no distinction shall be made between the territory
of Maplewood and the territory of Landfall, in any respect, in the level, time or other mode of delivery of
police services in Landfall. This does not include paramedic service.
V. HEADQUARTERS AND EQUIPMENT
The headquarters of personnel of Maplewood providing police service in Landfall shall be in Maplewood,
and members of the general public having need to communicate with the Maplewood Police Department on
matters arising out of or involving persons or property in Landfall may communicate directly with
Maplewood police headquarters. Maplewood, under the terms of this Agreement, will provide all
communication devices, equipment, records, other materials and personnel necessary to the performance
of this contract, except to the extent that this contract specifically provides for the furnishing of any part
thereof by Landfall.
VI. PUBLIC INFORMATION
Both parties agree to take any or all steps necessary to inform the public of the fact that Maplewood is
providing police service for Landfall. Landfall shall advise the City of Maplewood of what information was
given to the public and citizens of Landfall concerning Maplewood's police service for Landfall.
VII. PERSONNEL, POLICIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS
All personnel used in providing police service to Landfall under this Agreement shall be and remain
employees of Maplewood. The personnel policies applicable to Maplewood Police Department employees
shall apply, and in all instances, retirement and fringe benefits shall be the responsibility of and subject to
determination from time to time by Maplewood.
The standards of performance, discipline of law enforcement officers, the method of providing law
enforcement services and other matters incidental to the performance of law enforcement services under
this Agreement, including personnel to be employed, shall be determined by the City of Maplewood.
VIII. DESIGNATION OF MAPLEWOOD POLICE OFFICERS
AS LANDFALL POLICE OFFICERS
All members of the Maplewood Police Department shall be designated by Landfall, by Council resolution,
as duly appointed police officers of Landfall, authorized to act on all law enforcement matters within the
limits of Landfall in the same manner and to the same extent as though they were employees of Landfall.
Maplewood shall provide Landfall, from time to time, with the names of the members of the Maplewood
Police Department, to permit such action to be taken by Landfall.
IX. CHARGES BY MAPLEWOOD FOR POLICE SERVICE
Maplewood shall charge and Landfall shall pay for police service provided for under this Agreement as
hereinafter provided.
Maplewood will provide police services to Landfall for the period January 1, 2006, through December 31,
2006, for the sum of $109,944 (One- Hundred Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Fourty -Four Dollars) the
first year.
City Council 11 -28 -05
X. SUBSEQUENT CONTRACT CHARGES
Charges for 2006 police services shall be based upon the established rate for the sum of $109,944 as
provided in Section IX, and charges for police services for subsequent years shall be progressive, based
upon a cost of living increase based on the Minneapolis /St. Paul Consumer Index (or other consumer index
utilized by our finance department) being added to the amount paid in the previous year, and the product
shall be the amount payable during the ensuing calendaryearto Maplewood by Landfall for services under
this Agreement. Such sum shall be paid in four (4) equal installments. The first installment shall be paid on
or before the 15th day of January 2006, and the
remaining payments shall be made on or before April 15, 2006; July 15, 2006; and October 15, 2006. For
subsequent years, payments shall be made on the 15th day of January and the remaining payments on or
before April 15, July 15 and October 15, in equal amounts.
In July of each year, Maplewood shall notify Landfall in writing of the calculated costs for police service for
the following calendar year.
XI. GRANT APPLICATIONS AND USES OF AWARDS
Maplewood may, from time to time, apply for and receive grants related to the provision of services to
Landfall as identified in this Agreement. Maplewood will provide services and equipment to Landfall
pursuant to the terms of each grant. When a grant may expire, Maplewood is no longer obligated to
continue to provide the grant- funded service or equipment within the contract charges specified in Articles
IX and X in this Agreement. Maplewood and Landfall may, however, discuss the desirability and proper
manner for continuation of services or equipment beyond the terms of the grant.
XII. TERM OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 2006, and shall run through December 31, 2006. This
Agreement shall automatically renew on January 1 of each subsequent year and shall run through
December 31 of each year until terminated under the terms of this Agreement.
This Agreement may be terminated upon one hundred eighty (180) days' written notice provided to the
other party's city manager or city clerk. In the event of such termination, payment shall be made to the City
of Maplewood on a pro -rata basis until services cease.
The failure of either party to this Agreement to perform its terms or obligations hereunder shall entitle the
other party to cancel this Agreement and to pursue any and all remedies available at law or equity based
upon such failures; provided, however, such cancellation or pursuit of remedy shall be available and
exercisable if and only if such failure shall not be cured priorto the expiration of twenty (20) days after such
other party has given written notice of such failure to the defaulting party. All written notices under this
paragraph shall be deemed, satisfactorily given when mailed,
certified or registered United States Mail, postage prepaid to the address indicated below:
to the City of Maplewood:
City of Maplewood
Attention City Manager Richard Fursman
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
to the City of Landfall:
City of Landfall
Attention City Clerk Helen Hallis
11 Forest Heights
Landfall, MN 55128
City Council 11 -28 -05
XIII. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Dispute resolution /arbitration in the event of any differences, dispute or claim arising under and pursuant to
this Agreement or as to the performance thereof by the parties, the parties agree as follows:
a. Good faith negotiations. The party alleging such difference, dispute or claim shall provide specific
written notice of such difference, dispute or claim to the other party. The parties hereto agree that for a sixty
(60) -day period thereafter, the parties will engage in good faith negotiations at Maplewood City Hall to take
any further action in an attempt to resolve this dispute.
b. Arbitration. In the event the parties fail to resolve their dispute following good -faith negotiations, the
difference, dispute or claim shall be submitted to an arbitrator from City Government mutually agreed on by
the parties. The location of the arbitration shall be at the City Hall, City of Maplewood. The decision of the
arbitrator shall be final and not subject to appeal.
XIV. ORDINANCES, CITY CODE BOOKS, STREET MAPS
Landfall shall provide Maplewood with a copy of all of the ordinances of Landfall and with a copy of each
amendment or new ordinance hereafter adopted by Landfall while this Agreement is in effect. Landfall shall
provide Maplewood with a copy of the Landfall streets layout and with an updated copy as changes are
made.
XV. PROSECUTIONS: FINES, COURT COSTS, OVERTIME, ETC.
Landfall shall remain responsible for the prosecution of all alleged crimes, ordinance violations or traffic
offenses arising within Landfall which are not provided for by the County Attorney, and shall be entitled to
receive its appropriate municipal share of fines collected for violations of law occurring within Landfall.
XVI. LIABILITY
Forthe purposes of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Liability Act (Minn. Stat. 466), the employees and officers
of Maplewood are deemed to be employees (as defined in Minn. Stat. 466.01, subdivision 6) of Landfall.
Landfall agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Maplewood harmless against any claims brought or actions
filed against Maplewood or any officer, employee, agent, or volunteer of Maplewood for injury to, death of,
or damage to the property of any third person or persons, arising from the performance and provision of
assistance in responding to a request for assistance by Landfall pursuant to this agreement. Under no
circumstances, however, shall a party be required to pay on behalf of itself and other parties, any amounts
in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 applicable to any one
party. The limits of liability for some or all of the parties may not be added together to determine the
maximum amount of liability for any party.
Neither Maplewood nor any officer, employee, or volunteer of Maplewood shall be liable to Landfall or to
any other person for failure to furnish assistance, or for recalling assistance under this agreement.
XVII. MISCELLANEOUS
It is understood that this Agreement contains the entire Agreement between Maplewood and Landfall and
that no statements, promises or inducements made by any party hereto, or officer, agent or employee of
either party hereto, which is not contained in this written Agreement shall be valid and binding; and this
Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except in writing signed by the parties and endorsed
hereon. It is expressly understood between the parties hereto, and this understanding shall be considered
in interpreting the provision of this Agreement, that upon notice given by any party hereto, later negotiations
may be undertaken for the purpose of revising, adding to or striking any provision or provisions of this
City Council 11 -28 -05 10
Agreement which appear unworkable or insufficient to perfect, maintain and ensure the purpose of this
Agreement and any change of the provisions of this Agreement, after agreement between Maplewood and
Landfall shall be written and attached to this agreement as provided above and this later revision, addition
or deletion shall only apply to the provision revised, added or deleted and the remainder of this Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.
A waiver by any party or any term or condition of this Agreement and any paragraph shall not be deemed or
construed to be waiver of such term or condition for the future or any subsequent breach thereof.
This entire Agreement embodies the entire Agreement and understanding of the parties hereto with respect
to the subject matter hereof, and it supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements and
understandings, oral and written, relative to the subject matter of this Agreement.
Each party shall execute and deliver any and all documents and shall perform all acts reasonably
necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. And no party shall unreasonably withhold its
consent to any action which, by the terms hereof, require such consent.
N.E.S.A. Donation
Accepted a check for $1,000 from the Northeast Soccer Association to purchase goals
for the Afton Heights soccer field complex.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to ado
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
Councilmember Juenemann moved to ado
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann
it consent agenda item 2
Ayes-All
it consent agenda item 4.
Ayes-All
consent agenda items 1, 3, 5 -6
Ayes-All
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7:00 p.m. Maplewood Business Center Conditional Use Permit Review (1616 Gervais
Avenue)
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Planner Flnwall presented specifics from the report.
C. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following
persons were heard:
Jerry Steiner, Attorney for the Property Owner
Cindy Hall, 1596 Grandview Avenue, Maplewood
Kevin Hall, 1596 Grandview Avenue, Maplewood
Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to set a meeting (within 60 days) with the property owner, Pioneer
Press, City Staff, and if necessary the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. If no conclusion is reached,
the staff recommendation requiring the Maplewood Business Center to conduct a noise study which
meets state guidelines for determining nighttime noise standards will be implemented.
City Council 11 -28 -05 11
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All
AWARD OF BIDS
None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
The Myth (3090 Southlawn Drive)
Shared Parking Agreements
Outdoor Patio Review
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
Planner Finwall presented specifics from the report.
C. Jeff Kehr, Manager of the Myth Nightclub was present for council questions.
Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the shared parking agreements for the Myth Nightclub
located at 3090 Southlawn Avenue. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
The city issuing a conditional certificate of occupancy to the Myth allowing for a maximum
occupancy of 4,400.
b. The Myth entering into an agreement with the city which requires the Myth to provide for at least
1,108 parking spaces during the Myth's hours of operation. In the event the Myth fails to
maintain the agreements for the required parking spaces the certificate of occupancy issued by
the city will automatically convert to a maximum occupancy of 1,450. Any future shared parking
agreements approved by the city must cover a minimum period of one year and must ensure
notification to the city by both parties within 90 days of expiration. The agreement must be
reviewed and approved by city staff and the city attorney's office.
C. The city council will review and reconsider the shared parking agreement authorization in
September 2006.
During any use periods of the Myth nightclub the following conditions must be met:
1) Post each entrance to the parking lot with the name and location of the overflow parking
lots.
2) Ramsey County sheriff officers must patrol each lot (on -site and off - site).
3) Parking attendants must be stationed at each lot (on -site and off - site).
4) Parking attendants must direct traffic to overflow lots via maps.
5) Clean -up of each lot (on -site and off -site) must take place prior to 6 a.m. the next day.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the proposed 800 - square -foot rooftop patio for the Myth
Nightclub located at 3090 Southlawn Avenue. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
No outside music venues other than piped -in music is permitted on the patio.
City Council 11 -28 -05 12
The city council will review and reconsider the outdoor patio for any nuisances in June or July
2006, after the patio has been in use for at least two months.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
2. Conditional Use Permit Reviews — Ohlson Landscaping and Oehrlein Outdoor Property
Maintenance (1949 Atlantic Street)
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
Planner Finwall presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the conditional use permits for Olson landscaping (1949
Atlantic Street) and review again in June 2006 to ensure completion of all required landscaping and
again in August 2006 to ensure the completion of the required parking lot pavement.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All
Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the conditional use permit for Ohlson Outdoor Lawn
Maintenance (vacant lot north of 1949 Atlantic Street) and review again only if a problem arises or if
improvements are proposed for the property.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All
3. No Parking Zones — Twin Cities Hmong Alliance Church (1234 County Road B (at
Atlantic Street))
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
Fire Chief Lukin presented specifics from the report.
Nathan Yang, member of the Hmong Alliance Church at 1234 County Road B
Peggy Thompson 1246 County Road B, Maplewood
Jerry Markie, 1247 Leland Road, Maplewood
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the no- parking zones:
East side of Atlantic Street form County Road B to Leland as signed.
Both sides of Leland Road, 30 feet from each corner.
Any other areas signed as necessary.
during any church functions (with the installation of the necessary signage) for the following streets
near the Hmonq Alliance Church at 1234 County Road B.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Easement Vacation — Lot 1, Block 1, Heritage Square Addition (North of Legacy Parkway)
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Planner Ekstrand presented specifics from the report.
C. Chris Call, Lifeform Engineering Company was present for council questions.
City Council 11 -28 -05 13
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution vacating the unneeded four by ten foot
section of a drainage and utility easement within the Heritage Square Townhomes development subject
to Town and Country Homes releasing the City of Maplewood from any liability in case their property is
damaged within the easement due to utility repairs:
EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION 05 -11 -167
WHEREAS, Mr. Kevin Clark, of Town & Country Homes, applied for the vacation of a
four by ten foot portion of drainage and utility easement within the Heritage Square Townhome
development. This easement is described as follows:
THE WEST 10.00 FEET OF THE EAST 40.00 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 4.00 FEET OF
THE SOUTHERLY 10.00 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, HERITAGE SQUARE, RAMSEY COUNTY,
MINNESOTA. ALL DISTANCES TO BE MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES.
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2005, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city
staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners.
The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written
statements. The planning commission also considered reports and recommendations from the city
staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve this request.
WHEREAS, on November 28, 2005, the city council approved this request after considering the
recommendations of staff and the planning commission.
WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, the public interest in the property will go to the
adjoining property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
vacation because this four by ten foot section of a drainage and utility easement is not needed and,
therefore, would serve no public purpose. This vacation is subject to Town and Country Homes
releasing the City of Maplewood from any liability in case their property is damaged within the
easement due to utility repairs:
Seconded by Councilmember Bartol Ayes -All
2. Maple Leaf Ridge Business Center (2483 and 2497 Maplewood Drive)
a. Conditional Use Permit
b. Design Approval
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Planner Finwall presented specifics from the report.
C. Commissioner Trippler, presented the Planning Commission Report
d. Boardmember Heights presented the Community Design Review Board report
e. Jim Kellison, Kelco Real Estate Development Services, was present for council questions.
Missy O'Connor, 2506 Adele Street, Maplewood
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use permit
for a proposed building setback of 250 feet from the rear lot line for an office /industrial condominium
development at 2488 and 2497 Maplewood Drive. The motion includes the limitation of delivery times to
exclude early morning and evening hours:
City Council 11 -28 -05 14
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 05 -11 -069
WHEREAS, Kelco Real Estate Development Services has applied for a conditional use permit
to be allowed to build an office /industrial complex 250 feet from the abutting residential district. The
code requires 350 feet.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2488 and 2497 Maplewood Drive. The legal
description is:
W. H. HOWARD'S GARDEN LOTS EX STH 61 -1 N 85 FT OF LOT 3.
W. H. HOWARD'S GARDEN LOTS EX STH 61 -1 AND EX N 85 FT LOT 3.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On October 17, 2005, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
permit. The planning commission held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the paper and
sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The planning commission gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission
considered the recommendations of city staff and the public.
2. The city council reviewed this request on November 28, 2005 and considered the recommendations
of the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with
the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
City Council 11 -28 -05 15
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the city has date - stamped October 11, 2005 and the
lighting plan date - stamped November 21, 2005. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started, or the proposed use utilized, within one
year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this
deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The city's hours for noise control as stated in Section 18 -111 of the city code shall be complied with.
This means that there shall be no noise generated between the hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday
through Saturday and all day Sunday. The applicant's sale or lease agreements should specify
this.
5. The site lights, west of Building #3, the westerly building, shall be turned off after 10 p.m. unless
required to be on by the police department for security reasons. The lights on the west side of
Building #3 shall also be of a design that conceals the lens and bulbs of these light fixtures. Light -
intensity maximums must meet code requirements. The lighting plan must be coordinated with the
Police Department.
6. Combine the two legal descriptions into one legally- described lot prior to obtaining a building permit
for this development.
The applicant must provide a revised landscaping plan for Community Design Review Board
approval that provides a landscaping /screening plan, including a double row of trees along the west
boundary, which provides a visual screen that is at least 80 percent opaque and six feet tall upon
installation. If the double row of trees does not accomplish this, additional screening must be
provided. This screen shall be an all- season screen that may include decorative fencing, berming
and evergreen trees. This visual screen shall be provided along the rear of the property and shall
extend from there along both side lot lines to the rear setback line of Building #3. This plan may
take into account existing vegetation and existing screening.
8. Meet all requirements of the community design review board and city code for architectural design,
landscaping, site lighting and parking.
9. Meet all requirements of the city engineer for site grading, drainage, erosion control, dust control,
utilities and removal of roadway dirt build -up.
10. Outdoor storage of any materials shall not be allowed unless a conditional use permit for outdoor
storage is obtained from the city council.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Councilmembers Bartol, Juenemann,
Koppen and Rossbach
Abstain -Mayor Cardinal
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the site plan date - stamped October 11, 2005, and the
lighting plan date - stamped November 21, 2005. Approval is subject to the applicant /developer
complying with the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. Comply with all conditions of Chuck Vermeersch's engineering report dated October 17, 2005.
City Council 11 -28 -05 16
3. Obtain necessary permits from the Minnesota Department of Transportation before the issuance of
a building permit.
4. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey /Washington Metro Watershed District before the issuance of a
building permit.
5. Provide fencing on the top of all retaining walls that exceed four feet in height. The fencing shall be
a black chain link fence at least 3.5 feet tall. Retaining walls that exceed four feet in height must be
designed by a structural engineer, and the applicant must obtain a building permit.
The applicant must provide a revised landscaping plan for Community Design Review Board
approval that provides a landscaping /screening plan, including a double row of trees along the west
boundary, which provides a visual screen that is at least 80 percent opaque and six feet tall upon
installation. If the double row of trees does not accomplish this, additional screening must be
provided. This screen shall be an all- season screen that may include decorative fencing, berming
and evergreen trees. This visual screen shall be provided along the rear of the property and shall
extend from there along both side lot lines to the rear setback line of Building #3. This plan may
take into account existing vegetation and existing screening.
7. Obtain approval of a comprehensive sign plan from the community design review board before any
sign permits may be issued.
8. Submit a complete lighting plan to staff for approval. The site lights, west of Building #3, the
westerly building, shall be turned off after 10 p.m. unless required to be on by the police department
for security reasons. The lights on the west side of Building #3 shall also be of a design that
conceals the lens and bulbs of these light fixtures. Light - intensity maximums must meet code
requirements. The lighting plan must be coordinated with the Police Department.
Provide a revised landscaping plan for approval by the Community Design Review Board for the
area along the street frontage, increasing the amount of plantings in this area.
10. The applicant must provide an in- ground irrigation system as required by code. The area around
the pond does not need to be sprinklered.
11. The rear elevations of all buildings, and any parts of the side elevations that are rock -face block,
must be painted to match the front building colors.
12. Provide cash escrow, in the amount of 150 percent of the cost of completing the landscaping and
exterior site improvements, before the applicant shall obtain a building permit.
13. All customer parking spaces must be at least 9 '/ feet wide. Employee parking spaces may be nine
feet wide if signs are posted identifying them as employee parking only.
14. The community design review board shall approve major changes to these plans. Minor changes
may be approved by staff.
15. On Building #3, the west, north and south elevations shall incorporate the same CMU (concrete
masonry unit) band as proposed on the front to wrap around the entire building.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Councilmembers Bartol, Juenemann,
Koppen and Rossbach
Abstain -Mayor Cardinal
3. Wine and Strong Beer Liquor License — Pei Wei Asian Diner — Edward Unangst
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
City Council 11 -28 -05 17
b. REaL Director /City Clerk Guilfoile presented specifics from the report.
C. Edward Unangst was present for council questions.
Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the wine and strong beer liquor licenses for Pei Wei
Asian Dinner to be located at 3095 White Bear Avenue.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
Capitol Region Watershed District Draft Rules
Resolution Requesting Time Extension for Comment Deadline and City Involvement in
Developing Acceptable Rules and Standards
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
City Engineer AN presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following resolution requesting a time extension for
Comment Deadline and City Involvement in Developing Acceptable Rules and Standards:
RESOLUTION 05 -11 -170
REQUESTING A TIME EXTENSION FOR COMMENT DEADLINE AND CITY INVOLVEMENT IN
DEVELOPING ACCEPTABLE RULES AND STANDARDS
WHEREAS, the Capitol Regions Watershed District (hereinafter, the "CRWD ") was established
on September 24, 1998. Approximately 600 acres of the City of Maplewood is within the CRWD. The
CRWD also includes portions of Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Roseville and St. Paul: and
WHEREAS, on October 10, 2005, the City of Maplewood was notified by the CRWD that
completed draft rules and technical standards were ready for review within a 45 -day time period that
was set to end on November 29` 2005 at 4:30 pm; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the draft rules and technical standards proposed by CRWD and
has identified a number of concerns. The draft rules and standards have the potential to affect
construction projects, including but not limited to, commercial and residential developments and
redevelopments, street reconstruction projects, new street construction projects, and maintenance
operations of storm sewer systems. The following questions and concerns have been identified and are
listed below:
1. The 60 day permit review period has the potential to reduce the construction season for
public projects by two months as the contractor must sign the permit application.
2. Municipalities are exempt from the permit fee, but must provide cash surety for 125% of
the storm water facilities within the construction project.
3. Runoff volumes must be reduced by 1 inch over all impervious areas and 90% of solids
must be removed for a 2.5' event. There may not be available right of way or public property to
accommodate this requirement in neighborhood street reconstruction projects and the cost to obtain
additional property would be great.
4. How is the infiltration requirement met in areas with poor soils?
5. Pretreatment of runoff is required prior to infiltration. What constitutes pretreatment?
6. The draft rules and standards do not address a minimum development size requiring a
permit.
7. What are the additional costs to maintain the required pretreatment and infiltration
facilities?
City Council 11 -28 -05 18
WHEREAS, City staff believes the 45 day review period ending on November 29` 2005 has
not provided sufficient time for the city to submit appropriate comments regarding technical,
engineering and cost benefit analysis of the draft rules and technical standards, and
WHEREAS, a technical advisory committee has not been established as required by state
statute 103D.337 requiring the establishment of a technical advisory committee, consisting of cities,
counties and soil and water conservation districts by watershed districts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that the City of Maplewood requests Capitol Regions Watershed District to establish a
technical advisory committee to assist in determining appropriate draft rules and technical standards
and also requests the comment review period be extended beyond November 29` 2005 to allow the
City of Maplewood to provide thorough comments.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
Kenwood Area Street Improvements - City Project 05 -16
Resolution Accepting Report and Calling Public Hearing
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
City Engineer AN presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following resolution accepting the report and calling for
a Dublic hearina for 7:00 D.m.. Monday. December 12` .2005. for the Kenwood Area Street
Improvements protect:
RESOLUTION 05 -11 -171
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted June 13th, 2005, a report has been
prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of Kenwood Area Streets,
City Project 05 -16, and this report was received by the council on November 28, 2005, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost - effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report
and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $4,727,140.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 12` day of
December, 2005 in the council chambers of city hall at 7:00 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and
published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All
Approval of Snow and Ice Control Policy
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
City Engineer AN presented specifics from the report.
City Council 11 -28 -05 19
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following proposal establishing a policy for snow and ice
control. Upon council approval, staff will ensure that the Snow and Ice Control Policy is placed on the
city's website:
City Of Maplewood Snow and Ice Control Policy
PURPOSE Snow and ice control is necessary for public safety, routine travel, and emergency
services. The purpose of this policy is to establish procedures concerning snow and ice control. The
following is a GUIDE for winter operations. The City of Maplewood considers snow and ice control a top
priority and emergency in nature. The City of Maplewood currently maintains 122 centerline miles and
145 cul -de -sacs.
GOALS
To monitor, in conjunction with the Maplewood Police Department and a weather service, road
and weather conditions 24 hours per day.
To allow emergency vehicles access during weather events.
To maintain streets in a safe driving condition.
To perform snow and ice control in a timely and cost effective manner.
To have streets plowed to full width within 8 hours after snow has quit falling.
EQUIPMENT The Public Works department utilizes 8 single axel dump trucks, 2 tandem axel trucks,
and 2 wheel loaders all with main plows, side wings, and spreaders on the trucks. The use of a single
one ton pickup is available for some cul -de -sacs and designated trails.
PROCEDURES The Street Superintendent, or designated representative, determines when
operations begin based upon immediate and anticipated conditions. Each snow and ice event is unique
due to the many changing weather conditions. Maintenance requirements may vary for each event.
Freezing rain, sleet, ice The response can vary from a single truck to the entire fleet.
Snowfall of 2.5' or less The plowing plan varies depending upon temperature and time of year.
In some cases only high volume and collector streets will be plowed, with ice control applied at stop
signs, hills, bridges and curves. The superintendent may deem it necessary to complete a full plowing
of the City if we have had a series of nuisance snowfalls resulting in a buildup of snow on the streets.
Snowfall of 2" — 6" Depending on the timing of the event, every effort will be made to provide
safe driving conditions at critical times, mainly weekday mornings and evening rush hours. Once the
snowfall has ended a complete plowing will be performed. All plow routes will be re- checked and re-
plowed as needed.
Snowfall of 6" or more Each route has main roads, collector streets and priorities such as
hospitals, schools, and health care facilities. Depending on the rate of accumulation and other weather
factors it may be necessary to continually plow these roads until snowfall has let up at which time we
would move into secondary roads and neighborhoods.
SNOW STORAGE Snow will be stored in cul -de -sacs. When possible, snow will be placed in the
center of the cul -de -sac, otherwise off to the side so as not to interfere with mail service or driveways.
The City will remove the snow by hauling. Timing of the hauling will be at the discretion of the street
superintendent.
ICE CONTROL The City of Maplewood does not have a bare pavement policy. The City attempts to
maintain safe traveling roads for the general public. The City currently uses a mix of salt and sand. The
City is monitoring new technology and products for ice control, keeping in mind the cost and
environmental concerns.
City Council 11 -28 -05 20
SIDEWALKS The City of Maplewood provides minimum winter maintenance on designated high
usage sidewalk/trail systems. The sidewalk/trail system will be opened within 48 hours of the
completion of street operations. The City uses two Bobcat skid steers with plow, broom, or blower
depending on the snow event. The City has no bare surface policy and uses no chemical, de -icing or
sand treatments.
BOULEVARDS The City will assume no responsibility for landscape, shrubbery, irrigation, or other
materials placed on the City owned right -of -way. The City, at its option, will repair turf damage as a
result of plowing by re- seeding or replacing sod.
MAILBOXES If a mailbox is struck directly by the plow the City will replace the mailbox. The
replacement will consist of a 4x4 treated post and a mailbox closely matching the one that was
damaged. The City will not replace decorative, ornamental or brick -type construction. Homeowners
should inspect the installation prior to winter, check for rotted post and missing hardware. Due to frost
conditions, a permanent installation can not be made until spring.
REVIEW City staff will review the policy after each season and make recommendations to the City
Council. Staff recommendations will be based on resident feedback, staff observations, and new
practices and technology in the industry.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes -All
Moving Visitor Presentations to Beginning of City Council Meeting
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
Councilmember Rossbach presented specifics from the report.
L.
Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve moving visitor presentations following item D (Approval of
Minutes) and limit the total time to 15 minutes, with the time being divided equally among the people
who wish to speak.
Seconded by Councilmember Bartol
Ayes - Councilmembers Bartol, Juenemann
and Rossbach
Nays -Mayor Cardinal and Councilmember
Koppen
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Elect Diana Longrie -1771 Burr Street, Maplewood, expressed her support and
appreciation moving Visitor Presentations to the beginning of the agenda.
M.
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Food Shelf Program — Council member Juenemann gave a report on the program.
The last Mayor's Forum of the year will be held Saturday, December 3'' at 10:00 a.m.
None
City Council 11 -28 -05
21
O. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Koppen moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:48 p.m.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - All
City Council 11 -28 -05 22
Agenda Item D2
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m. Monday, December 05, 2005
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 05 -27
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL
C.
113
Robert Cardinal, Mayor
David Bartol, Councilmember
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember
Will Rossbach, Councilmember
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1 1I lei :1NF9NIcc]
1. Truth in Taxation 2006 Budget
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
a. A video with the highlights of the 2006 budget was presented.
b. City Manager Fursman provided details of the budget.
C. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Bill Schreiner, 1098 Beaver Creek Parkway, Maplewood
Jerry Markie, 1247 Leland Road, Maplewood
Patrick Horan, 2034 Hazelwood Street, Maplewood
Susan Korf, 1486 Sterling Street South, Maplewood
Joe Haines, 1145 Ferndale Street North, Maplewood
Tony Yang, 946 Ferndale Street South, Maplewood
Mark Allen, 345 Parkview Lane, Maplewood
Bob Erickson, 47 Kingston, Maplewood
Michelle Allen, 345 Parkview Lane, Maplewood
Rodney Korf, 1486 Sterling Street South, Maplewood
Bob Erickson, Second Appearance
Bob Erickson, Third Appearance
Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
C
Mayor Cardinal closed the meeting with the word equality. "Equality' expressed Mayor Cardinal
"is the formula that needs to be embraced'.
FUTURE TOPICS
F. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Cardinal adjourned the meeting at 9:39 p.m.
AGENDA NO. H -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: December 12, 2005
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills
and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTSPAYABLE:
$ 1,600.00 Manual Checks # 68582
dated 11/23/2005
$ 1,058,203.91 Checks # 68583 thru # 68643
dated 11/29/2005
$ 623,976.86 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 11/18/2005 thru 11/25/2005
$ 351,990.43 Checks # 68644 thru # 68680
dated 12/06/05
$ 227,714.70 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 11/18/05 thru 12/01/05
$ 2,263,485.90 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$ 470,466.26 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 12/02/2005
$ 2,449.75 Payroll Deduction check # 103463 thru #103465
dated 12/02/2005
$ 472,916.01 Total Payroll
$ 2,736,401.91 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651- 249 -2902 if you have any question
on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary.
ds
attachments
P: \EXCELWPRCLMS \2005 \05- AprClms 11 -25 and 12 -02
vchlist Check Register Page:
11/28/2005 11:58:29 AM CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
68582
11/23/2005
03551
ANDREW TULLAR
HOLIDAY CONCERT 11/26
1,600.00
68583
11/29/2005
00058
AICHELE, CRAIG
REIMS FOR MILEAGE 11 -14
8.73
68584
11/29/2005
02411
ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC
FILL ADAPTER
43.98
68585
11/29/2005
00111
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC
PATROL & BOARDING FEE 11/9 -
1,119.92
68586
11/29/2005
01811
BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC
MERCH FOR RESALE
126.00
MERCH FOR RESALE
252.00
68587
11/29/2005
00096
BP/AMOCO OIL COMPANY
FUEL
42.93
68588
11/29/2005
00211
BRAUN INTERTEC CORP.
PROJ 05 -10 PROF SRVS THRU 11/4
592.91
PROJ 03 -19 PROF SRVS THRU 11/4
1,377.75
68589
11/29/2005
00494
CHILDREN HOME & FAMILY SERVICE
MAPLEWOOD YOUTH DIVERSION -
3,526.08
68590
11/29/2005
00340
CRAMER BUILDING SERVICES
FINAL PMT -TRANE BLDG
3,680.00
68591
11/29/2005
00354
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS, INC.
FURNISH & INSTALL AIR VALVE
444.39
68592
11/29/2005
03470
DANNER INC
PROJ 05 -10 DAHL AVE PYMT #3
66,037.33
68593
11/29/2005
03549
DP FILTER SUPPLY
INSTALL COMPRESSOR
368.49
68594
11/29/2005
00451
EGAN -MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONTR
REPAIR UNIT HEATER
177.00
68595
11/29/2005
00462
EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC.
REPAIR TORNADO SIREN
170.00
68596
11/29/2005
00463
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
REPAIR LADDER 1
3,672.35
68597
11/29/2005
02635
G -WHIZ LETTERING
LOGO EMBLEM
41.54
68598
11/29/2005
03550
GAWARECKI, JOHN
REFEREE SOCCER
26.00
68599
11/29/2005
00585
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL
NET BILLABLE TICKETS -OCT
904.05
68600
11/29/2005
00589
GRAF, DAVE
KARATE INSTRUCTOR
110.50
68601
11/29/2005
00687
HUGO'S TREE CARE INC
TREE REMOVAL
1,597.50
TREE TRIMMING
798.75
TREE TRIMMING
426.00
CLEAN UP STORM DAMAGE
372.75
TREE TRIMMING
945.19
EQUIPMENT RENTAL WITH
5,750.00
TREE TRIMMING
4,540.21
TREE TRIMMING
372.75
DISEASED ELM TREE REMOVAL
6,505.02
68602
11/29/2005
00718
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #622
BUILDING RENTAL
41.50
68603
11/29/2005
00767
JOHNSON, KEVIN A
REIMS FOR UNIFORM
31.99
68604
11/29/2005
02196
JORGENSON CONST INC
PROJ 03 -19 PW BLDG ADDITION
546,877.00
68605
11/29/2005
02728
KI MLEY -HORN &ASSOCIATES INC
PROJ 03 -26 PROF SRVS THRU 9/30
2,785.20
PROJ 05 -07 PROF SRVS THRU 9/30
12,811.41
PROJ 05 -10 PROF SRVS THRU 9/30
13,981.32
68606
11/29/2005
00809
KONG, TOMMY
REIMS FOR MEAL 11/10
6.81
68607
11/29/2005
00827
L M C I T
WORK COMP AUDIT ADJ 2004 -2005
10,255.00
68608
11/29/2005
00393
LABOR & INDUSTRY, DEPT OF
FIRE STATION CERTIFICATE
10.00
68609
11/29/2005
00829
LTD COMMODITIES INC
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
86.29
68610
11/29/2005
00925
MAJESTIC LANDSCAPE CONTR INC
LAWN SPRINKLER MAINTENANCE
150.00
68611
11/29/2005
03417
MCFARLAND, P.C., THOMAS F
PROJ 02 -07 ABANDON MN COMM
1,250.47
68612
11/29/2005
01819
MCLEOD USA
LOCAL PHONE SRV 10/16 - 11/15
2,119.84
68613
11/29/2005
01038
MN DARE INC
TRAINING - 11/10
100.00
68614
11/29/2005
01169
NORM'S TIRE SALES INC
FURNISH & INSTALL TIRES
514.00
68615
11/29/2005
01175
NORTH ST PAUL, CITY OF
MONTHLY ELEC, SEWER & SEC
2,840.60
68616
11/29/2005
01200
NOVAK, MIKE
REIMS FOR UNIFORMS
194.88
68617
11/29/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF MANDY ERLER - MCC
100.00
68618
11/29/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF PHIL GROEBE - MEMBERSHIP
79.88
68619
11/29/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF DANIEL KLOCKE -
75.40
68620
11/29/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF M RICHARDSON -AMB
53.78
vchlist Check Register Page: 2
11/28/2005 11:58:29 AM CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount
68621
11/29/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF ROBERT WAGNER - MCC
18.00
68622
11/29/2005
01254
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
MERCH FOR RESALE
299.20
MERCH FOR RESALE
296.20
68623
11/29/2005
01284
POSTMASTER
CITY NEWS POSTAGE - DEC
2,260.00
68624
11/29/2005
01302
PRIEM, STEVEN
REIMS FOR MILEAGE 11 -14
9.70
68625
11/29/2005
00396
PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF
TRANSFER TITLE FOR CN #05-
17.50
68626
11/29/2005
01359
REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL XX
CAR WASHES - OCT
52.80
68627
11/29/2005
01360
REINHART FOODSERVICE
MERCH FOR RESALE
190.49
MERCH FOR RESALE
121.69
68628
11/29/2005
03133
RICE, DAN
REIMS FOR TRAINING 11/17
381.33
68629
11/29/2005
01409
S.E.H.
MARKHAM POND - OCT
9,231.73
AFTON HEIGHTS PARK - OCT
286.37
PROJ 02 -07 PROF SRVS - OCT
1,512.40
ROSELAWN AVE - OCT
4,239.54
BRAND AVE - OCT
1,393.36
HILL MURRAY SITE -OCT
845.13
PROJ 03 -04 PROF SRVS - OCT
689.87
PROJ 04 -22 PROF SRVS - OCT
11,013.19
PROJ 03 -07 PROF SRVS - OCT
20,573.78
NPDES PHASE II SRV FEE - OCT
245.00
68630
11/29/2005
03215
SHAFER CONTRACTING CO INC
PROJ 02 -07 COUNTY RD D PYMT
278,335.84
68631
11/29/2005
03278
SKRYPEK'S DAIRY QUEEN
DAIRY QUEEN CAKES
117.25
68632
11/29/2005
01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
719.84
WATER & HYDRANT USAGE - 3RD
163.16
68633
11/29/2005
01564
SUZANNE'S CUISINE, INC.
MCC EVENT REFRESHMENTS 11/5
905.25
68634
11/29/2005
01580
TSE, INC.
JANITORIAL SRVS 9/18 - 10/15
957.00
68635
11/29/2005
02165
URS / BRW INC
PROJ 03-12194 NOISE WALL THRU
2,649.40
68636
11/29/2005
01709
VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL
MAPLEWOOD CLEAN UP DAY 2005
5,997.79
68637
11/29/2005
03194
VERNIX FORESTRY CONSULTANTS
SHADE TREE DISEASE MGMT 8/28 -
2,597.92
68638
11/29/2005
01734
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSP
798.08
68639
11/29/2005
01750
WATSON CO INC, THE
MERCH FOR RESALE
181.21
MERCH FOR RESALE
245.54
68640
11/29/2005
02410
WELLS FARGO LEASING INC
RICOH COPIER LEASE 11/9 -12/9
1,467.57
68641
11/29/2005
02243
WINDSOR COMPANIES INC
IRRIGATION SERVICES - OCT
115.00
68642
11/29/2005
03378
WOEHRLE, MATT
REIMS FOR MILEAGE 11 -14
170.70
68643
11/29/2005
01190
XCEL ENERGY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
10,709.59
62 Checks in
this report
Total checks :
1,059,803.91
9
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pavee
11/17/05
11/18/05
11/15/05
11/17/05
11/18/05
11/18/05
11/18/05
11/18/05
11/18/05
11/21/05
11/18/05
11/15/05
11/18/05
11/22/05
11/18/05
11/23/05
11/21/05
11/18/05
11/18/05
11/18/05
11/18/05
11/21/05
11/21/05
11/21/05
11/21/05
11/21/05
11/22/05
11/22/05
11/22/05
11/22/05
11/23/05
11/23/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
MN State Treasurer
ICMA (Vantagepointe)
MN Dept of Revenue
MN Dept of Natural Resources
MN State Treasurer
U.S. Treasurer
P.E.R.A.
Orchard Trust
Federal Reserve Bank
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN Dept of Revenue
Labor Unions
MN State Treasurer
WI Dept of Revenue
MN State Treasurer
ARC Administration
TOTAL
Description
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Deferred Compensation
Sales Tax
DNR electronic licenses
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Federal Payroll Tax
P.E.R.A.
Deferred Compensation
Savings Bonds
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
State Payroll Tax
Fuel Tax
Union Dues
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
State Payroll Tax
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
DCRP & Flex plan payments
Amount
8,219.24
7,930.47
5,822.00
61.50
8,365.75
92,405.55
55,579.50
25,227.62
100.00
14,018.75
18,624.47
234.00
2,384.42
367,006.67
1,687.21
15,122.73
1,186.98
623,976.86
53
vchlist Check Register Page: 1
12/02/2005 1:19:31 PM CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check Date Vendor Descriotion /Account Amount
68644
12/6/2005
00055
AFFORDABLE ENGRAVING INC
SIGNS
926.55
68645
12/6/2005
00110
ANDREWS, SCOTT
REIMB FOR MEALS 10/3 & 10/4
16.00
68646
12/6/2005
00174
BELDE, STAN
K -9 MAINTENANCE - DEC
35.00
68647
12/6/2005
02914
BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF MN
MONTHLY PREMIUM
123,925.50
68648
12/6/2005
00198
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
WATER UTILITY
738.72
68649
12/6/2005
01922
BREHEIM, ROGER
REIMB FOR CELL PHONE - DEC
15.00
68650
12/6/2005
00230
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.
ROCK FOR DRAINAGE GRADING
1,202.02
68651
12/6/2005
00279
GEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO.
CONCRETE DIVIDERS
447.30
68652
12/6/2005
02929
CNAGLAC
LONG TERM CARE INS
907.04
68653
12/6/2005
02791
DAVIS & LAGERMAN INC
APPRAISAL SERVICES
500.00
68654
12/6/2005
00384
DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SRVS
RICOH COPIER - DEC
161.88
68655
12/6/2005
00668
HIEBERT, STEVEN
K -9 MAINTENANCE - DEC
35.00
68656
12/6/2005
02506
HUNT ELECTRIC CORP
ELECTRICAL WORK - WAKEFIELD
990.00
ELECTRICAL WORK-
279.73
ELECTRICAL WORK - FOUR
282.54
ELECTRICAL WORK- MPLWD HITS
779.88
ELECTRICAL WORK - GOODRICH
583.06
68657
12/6/2005
01894
KELLY & FAWCETT PA
REFUND STATE PATROL
78.49
68658
12/6/2005
02872
METLIFE SBC
MONTHLY DENTAL PREMIUM
9,613.94
68659
12/6/2005
00985
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
WASTEWATER - DEC
185,478.30
68660
12/6/2005
01018
MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT
AUTOMATED PAWN SHOP FEE -
555.00
68661
12/6/2005
01085
MN LIFE INSURANCE
MONTHLY PREMIUM
3,902.50
68662
12/6/2005
03248
MUSIC MAGIC
DJ SERVICE FOR DANCE 12/16/05
325.00
68663
12/6/2005
01156
NELSON, JEAN
REIMB FOR MILEAGE 10/1 TO 11/30
84.44
68664
12/6/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF PAMELA TRAVNICK- MCC
105.00
68665
12/6/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF ANGELA VELASQUEZ -MCC
35.00
68666
12/6/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF THE CAR WASH CO - FALSE
25.00
68667
12/6/2005
00396
PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF
INTOXILYZER OPERATOR COURSE
350.00
68668
12/6/2005
01340
REGIONS HOSPITAL
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
467.05
68669
12/6/2005
01387
ROSSINI, DR. JAMES
FITNESS PROGRAM ADMIN FEE -
100.00
68670
12/6/2005
01418
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
239.68
MERCH FOR RESALE
127.17
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM SUPPLIES
40.69
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
221.61
MERCH FOR RESALE
85.50
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
49.17
MERCH FOR RESALE
120.44
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM SUPPLIES
50.75
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM SUPPLIES
27.82
MERCH FOR RESALE
54.15
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM SUPPLIES
50.90
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
60.86
68671
12/6/2005
01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
CRIME LAB SERVICES - OCT
210.00
68672
12/6/2005
01546
SUBURBAN SPORTSWEAR LLC
VOLLEYBALL SHIRTS
686.00
68673
12/6/2005
01550
SUMMIT INSPECTIONS
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
4,086.20
68674
12/6/2005
01574
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
ASPHALT
153.98
68675
12/6/2005
01653
TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO
SANDERS
401.06
68676
12/6/2005
01692
U S POSTAL SERVICE
BRIM POSTAGE PERMIT 625000
150.00
68677
12/6/2005
00529
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO
STD PLAN 41043120 -0 -1 DEC
1,538.71
MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM
2,396.99
68678
12/6/2005
01757
WELCHLIN, CABOT
REIMB FOR UNIFORM
41.99
68679
12/6/2005
02462
WEMYSS, SCOTT D
NAMETAGS
13.00
68680
12/6/2005
01190
XCEL ENERGY
GAS UTILITY
8,238.82
37 Checks
in this report
Total checks :
351,990.43
5
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pavee Description Amount
11/11/05
11/18/05
Elan Financial Services*
Purchasing card items
6,530.63
11/23/05
11/28/05
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
377.00
11/28/05
11/29/05
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
17,601.91
11/29/05
11/30/05
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
23,254.47
11/30/05
12/01/05
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
12,215.75
12/01/05
12/01/05
US Bank
Debt Service
132,350.00
11/30/05
12/01/05
US Bank
Credit Card fees
981.38
11/25/05
12/01/05
US Bank VISA One Card*
Purchasing card items
34,403.56
TOTAL
227,714.70
*Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached.
2
Transaction Review 11/14/2005
For Trnnsaetions posted between 10/29/2005 to 11/11/2005
Post Date Vendor Name Settlernent Amt Cardholder Name
11/09/2005
VERIZON WRLS I2KW
45.28
R CHARLES ABE
11/09/2005
G & K SERVICES 006
462.28
BRUCE K ANDERSON
11/02/2005
SHRED -IT
89.91
JOHN BANICK
11/04/2005
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
1,703.72
JOHN BANICK
11/01/2005
ADAMS PEST CONTROL
14958
JIM BEHAN
11/09/2005
STATE SUPPLY CO. INC
9.37
JIM BEHAN
10/31/2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
29.27
PATRICIA FRY
11/03/2005
SPRINTPCS AUTOPYMT RC 1
122.49
RICHARD FURSMAN
11/11/2005
PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC.
50.00
KAREN E GUILFOILE
11/02/2005
ADT SECURITY SERVICES
157.28
STEVE HURLEY
11/03/2005
DE LAGE LANDEN OPOI OF 0
206.61
ANN E HUTCHINSON
11/02/2005
VERIZON WRLS I2KW
45.28
SHERYL L LE
11/02/2005
CUB FOODS, INC.
34.61
GORDON MALLORY
11/01/2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
458.65
AMY NIVEN
11/02/2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
6.01
AMY NIVEN
11/09/2005
G & K SERVICES 006
262.00
AMY NIVEN
11/09/2005
G & K SERVICES 006
150.71
AMY NIVEN
11/09/2005
G & K SERVICES 006
66.44
AMY NIVEN
11/11/2005
PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC.
50.00
DENNIS PECK
10/31/2005
EAT INC
40.74
STEVEN PRIEM
11/07/2005
DIGITAL AGE 888 - 529 -98
-24.99
TERRIE RAMEAUX
10/31/2005
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
932.73
MICHAEL REILLY
11/02/2005
SHRED -IT
17.65
DEB SCHMIDT
11/02/2005
T- MOBILE
46.24
SCOTT SCHULTZ
11/09/2005
G & K SERVICES 006
55.60
GERALD SEEGER
11/07/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
70.29
JUDY TETZLAFF
11/07/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
70.29
JUDY TETZLAFF
11/07/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
70.29
JUDY TETZLAFF
11/07/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
99.68
JUDY TETZLAFF
11/07/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
99.68
JUDY TETZLAFF
11/07/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
99.68
JUDY TETZLAFF
11/07/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
99.68
JUDY TETZLAFF
11/07/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
14058
JUDY TETZLAFF
11/07/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
240.08
JUDY TETZLAFF
11/07/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
372.92
JUDY TETZLAFF
6,530.63
7
Transactions from 11 -12 -05 to 11- 25 -05.
Posting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
11/21/05
WWW.REGONLINE.COM
$180.00
SCOTTANDREWS
11/14/05
CUB FOODS, INC.
$13.09
MANDY ANZALDI
11/14/05
FACTORY CARD OUTLET #284
$21.65
MANDY ANZALDI
11/21/05
TARGET 00011858
$15.96
MANDY ANZALDI
11/21/05
THE MOVIEMUSIC COMPANY
$42.97
MANDY ANZALDI
11/14/05
MERMAID
$15.90
JOHN BANICK
11/15/05
DOWN TOWNER CARWAS
$262.15
JOHN BANICK
11/23/05
THE UPS STORE #2171
$10.05
JOHN BANICK
11/23/05
AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS -MN
$134.25
JOHN BANICK
11/25/05
EXCELLCOM
$42.58
JOHN BANICK
11/17/05
NUCO2 01 OF 01
$80.30
JIM BEHAN
11/17/05
NUCO2 01 OF 01
$87.33
JIM BEHAN
11/17/05
NUCO2 01 OF 01
$87.33
JIM BEHAN
11/17/05
NUCO2 01 OF 01
$60.71
JIM BEHAN
11/17/05
NUCO2 01 OF 01
$56.82
JIM BEHAN
11/17/05
NUCO2 01 OF 01
$87.33
JIM BEHAN
11/14/05
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$21.06
JIM BEHAN
11/14/05
METRO MECHANICAL 01 OF 01
$559.63
JIM BEHAN
11/14/05
VERIZON WRLS 12KW
$46.67
JIM BEHAN
11/18/05
MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER
$748.03
JIM BEHAN
11/21/05
THERMO -DYNE INC
$1,249.53
JIM BEHAN
11/25/05
ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC
$480.00
JIM BEHAN
11/18/05
BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKL
$8.04
OAKLEY BIESANZ
11/21/05
MICHAELS #9401
$22.45
OAKLEY BIESANZ
11/25/05
T J T- SHIRTS
$788.50
OAKLEY BIESANZ
11/16/05
BEST BUY 00000109
$6.38
ROGER BREHEIM
11/17/05
CUB FOODS, INC.
$30.15
ROGER BREHEIM
11/18/05
WW GRAINGER 500
$78.84
ROGER BREHEIM
11/25/05
WW GRAINGER 500
($78.84)
ROGER BREHEIM
11/25/05
WW GRAINGER 500
$9.45
ROGER BREHEIM
11/21/05
FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
$138.02
HEIDI CAREY
11/21/05
DEX EAST - LOCKBOX
$34.35
HEIDI CAREY
11/25/05
GREATAPES
$346.15
HEIDI CAREY
11/25/05
JOANN ETC #1970
$39.07
HEIDI CAREY
11/25/05
FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
$95.85
HEIDI CAREY
11/25/05
LUTSEN MOUNTAINS INC.
$535.53
HEIDI CAREY
11/25/05
GE CAPITAL
$158.69
LINDACROSSON
11/14/05
INT'L ASSOC OF ADMIN PRO
$105.00
ROBERTA DARST
11/16/05
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$33.81
ROBERTA DARST
11/16/05
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$2.98
ROBERTA DARST
11/22/05
GOVERNING MAGAZINE
$16.00
ROBERTA DARST
11/14/05
DAVIS LOCK & SAFE
$76.10
THOMAS DEBILZAN
11/21/05
MENARDS 3059
$20.16
RICHARD DOBLAR
11/25/05
ADVANCE SHORING COMPAN
$35.89
DOUG EDGE
11/17/05
BATTERIES PLUS
$42.59
DAVE EDSON
11/21/05
LTG POWER EQUIPMENT
$25.11
DAVE EDSON
11/14/05
WEBER & TROSETH INC
$128.76
LARRY FARR
11/14/05
WMS *WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY
$327.77
LARRY FARR
11/14/05
TARGET 00006940
$328.18
LARRY FARR
11/14/05
TARGET 00006940
$13.56
LARRY FARR
11/21/05
MINVALCO INC
$570.98
LARRY FARR
11/21/05
EXCELLCOM
$21.29
LARRY FARR
11/23/05
SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION
$620.00
LARRY FARR
11/25/05
DEY DISTRIBUTING, INC.
$119.41
LARRY FARR
11/25/05
TARGET 00011858
($10.64)
LARRY FARR
0
Posting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
11/25/05
THE WESTERN GROUP
$1,250.00
LARRY FARR
11/23/05
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFIC
$310.00
DANIEL F FAUST
11/21/05
STREAMLINE DESIGN INC
$2,111.75
GREG FINN
11/14/05
DEEP ROCK WATER
$106.34
DAVID FISHER
11/14/05
DEEP ROCK WATER
$83.77
DAVID FISHER
11/21/05
CRESCENT ELEC BR 155
$391.01
MYCHAL FOWLDS
11/25/05
CRESCENT ELEC BR 155
$135.26
MYCHAL FOWLDS
11/21/05
INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR
$397.46
NICK FRANZEN
11/25/05
IRON AGE CORP
$147.95
RONALD FREBERG
11/21/05
PAKOR INC
$422.80
PATRICIA FRY
11/15/05
KNOWLANS #2
$4.58
VIRGINIAGAYNOR
11/16/05
BROCKWHITE -180
$150.17
VIRGINIAGAYNOR
11/16/05
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$64.62
VIRGINIAGAYNOR
11/21/05
DAVANNI'S #9
$32.66
VIRGINIAGAYNOR
11/25/05
EAT INC
$322.50
CLARENCE GERVAIS
11/15/05
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$11.65
JEAN GLASS
11/16/05
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$47.74
JEAN GLASS
11/17/05
SCHOOL TECH INC
$31.94
MIKE GRAF
11/21/05
MILLS FLEET FARM #27
$10.60
MIKE GRAF
11/16/05
LESCO SC 0530
$426.00
GARY HINNENKAMP
11/17/05
TARGET 00000687
$25.62
RON HORWATH
11/18/05
AMERICAN RED CROS01 OF 01
$55.00
RON HORWATH
11/17/05
BEST BUY 00000109
$40.46
STEVE HURLEY
11/16/05
WOLF CAMERA #1541
$6.68
ANN E HUTCHINSON
11/21/05
RIVERTOWN POTTERY
$1,278.00
ANN E HUTCHINSON
11/25/05
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE
$650.00
SCOTT JACOBSON
11/14/05
WORLD FOOTLOCKER #5032
$59.99
FLINT KARIS
11/21/05
WATER GEAR INC.
$64.30
MARY B KOEHNEN
11/25/05
TARGET 00006197
$31.95
MARY B KOEHNEN
11/14/05
VERIZON WRLS 33007 -01
$122.43
DUWAYNE KONEWKO
11/16/05
SEMINARS NAT'L/PADGETT
($85.13)
SHERYL L LE
11/25/05
NPELRA
$459.00
SHERYL L LE
11/15/05
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
$51.51
MICHAEL LIDBERG
11/15/05
SEARS ROEBUCK 1122
$36.19
MICHAEL LIDBERG
11/21/05
MENARDS 3059
$74.49
DENNIS LINDORFF
11/14/05
SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
$882.21
STEVE LUKIN
11/16/05
OFFICE MAX 00002204
$12.77
STEVE LUKIN
11/16/05
VERIZON WRLS I2KW
$54.98
STEVE LUKIN
11/16/05
AJ FORLITI PHOTOGRAPHY
$26.75
STEVE LUKIN
11/22/05
SBC PAGING
$18.28
STEVE LUKIN
11/22/05
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
$977.12
STEVE LUKIN
11/23/05
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
$149.85
STEVE LUKIN
11/14/05
AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPL
$71.57
MARK MARUSKA
11/15/05
WASTE MANAGEMENT
$794.13
MARK MARUSKA
11/16/05
VERIZON WRLS I2KW
$41.86
MARK MARUSKA
11/23/05
LTG POWER EQUIPMENT
$41.58
MARK MARUSKA
11/25/05
HUGOS TREE CARE
$318.44
MARK MARUSKA
11/18/05
CUB FOODS - SUN RAY
$30.00
JON A MELANDER
11/21/05
BYERLY'S ST. PAUL
$11.70
JON A MELANDER
11/18/05
TEE'S PLUS
$342.16
ALEISA METRY
11/21/05
JACK NADEL INC
$331.58
ALEISA METRY
11/16/05
VERIZON WRLS I2KW
$62.21
ED NADEAU
11/17/05
NORTHWOOD POWER EQUIPMENT
$29.81
RICHARD NORDQUIST
11/17/05
RAGSTOCK 15
$74.90
RICHARD NORDQUIST
11/16/05
GANDER MOUNTAI00104802
$79.99
ROBERT PETERSON
11/17/05
YOCUM OIL CO
$77.21
ROBERT PETERSON
11/14/05
WOLF CAMERA #1530
$16.11
PHILIP F POWELL
0
Posting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
11/21/05
WOLF CAMERA #1530
$17.65
PHILIP F POWELL
11/21/05
INKJETSUPERSTORE COM
$102.40
PHILIP F POWELL
11/23/05
SUPPLIES USA
$138.81
PHILIP F POWELL
11/18/05
CENTURY COMMUNITY TECHNIC
$50.00
ROBERT PRECHTEL
11/18/05
TARGET 00000687
$84.99
ROBERT PRECHTEL
11/21/05
BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
$180.41
ROBERT PRECHTEL
11/22/05
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$7.40
ROBERT PRECHTEL
11/17/05
GE CAPITAL
$331.22
WILLIAM J PRIEFER
11/14/05
AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPL
$74.24
STEVEN PRIEM
11/14/05
O'RE ILLY #1569
$152.88
STEVEN PRIEM
11/14/05
ARROW TERMINAL LLC
$42.69
STEVEN PRIEM
11/15/05
NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT
$9.55
STEVEN PRIEM
11/16/05
TOUSLEY FORD 127200039
$85.34
STEVEN PRIEM
11/17/05
CATCO PARTS & SERV #1
$71.56
STEVEN PRIEM
11/17/05
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
$50.00
STEVEN PRIEM
11/17/05
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
$95.00
STEVEN PRIEM
11/18/05
BAUER BUILT TRE33200023
$560.79
STEVEN PRIEM
11/18/05
BAUER BUILT TRE33200023
$189.63
STEVEN PRIEM
11/18/05
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
$55.37
STEVEN PRIEM
11/21/05
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
$143.49
STEVEN PRIEM
11/21/05
TRI STATE BOBCAT
$4.30
STEVEN PRIEM
11/22/05
BAUER BUILT TRE33200023
$280.39
STEVEN PRIEM
11/22/05
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
$201.62
STEVEN PRIEM
11/22/05
PAM OIL INC
$302.59
STEVEN PRIEM
11/23/05
EAT INC
$139.52
STEVEN PRIEM
11/23/05
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
$32.01
STEVEN PRIEM
11/23/05
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
$111.83
STEVEN PRIEM
11/25/05
BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
($29.44)
STEVEN PRIEM
11/25/05
AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPL
$87.17
STEVEN PRIEM
11/25/05
BAUER BUILT TRE33200023
$231.93
STEVEN PRIEM
11/25/05
BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
$424.24
STEVEN PRIEM
11/25/05
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
$29.11
STEVEN PRIEM
11/25/05
KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
$5.40
STEVEN PRIEM
11/14/05
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
$602.64
MICHAEL REILLY
11/25/05
HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS
$452.00
MICHAEL REILLY
11/14/05
WALGREEN 00029363
$14.86
AUDRA ROBBINS
11/21/05
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY INC
$508.32
AUDRA ROBBINS
11/16/05
MENARDS 3059
$51.87
ROBERT RUNNING
11/21/05
CENTURY COMMUNITY TECHNIC
$450.00
ROBERT RUNNING
11/25/05
MIDWEST FENCE
$32.64
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
11/16/05
DATA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
$87.54
DEB SCHMIDT
11/16/05
CURTIS 1000
$50.34
DEB SCHMIDT
11/25/05
ANCHOR PAPER MINNEAPOLIS
$17.51
DEB SCHMIDT
11/18/05
CLOVER SUPER FOODS
$138.79
RUSSELL L SCHMIDT
11/23/05
ARAMARK REF SVS #6013-
$392.95
RUSSELL L SCHMIDT
11/21/05
FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
$341.87
ANDREASINDT
11/25/05
CLEAN W PRESS #5
$26.07
PAULINE STAPLES
11/17/05
DE LAGE LANDEN OP01 OF 01
$511.20
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
11/18/05
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$130.72
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
11/23/05
METRO SALES INC
$898.00
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
11/21/05
MINN FIRE SVC CERT BOARD
$55.00
RUSTIN SVENDSEN
11/14/05
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
$93.21
LYLE SWANSON
11/25/05
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
$255.92
LYLE SWANSON
11/17/05
CHD *C AND H DISTRIBTRS
$329.16
LYLE SWANSON
11/23/05
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$75.24
LYLE SWANSON
11/23/05
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$57.00
LYLE SWANSON
11/25/05
WW GRAINGER 500
$122.74
LYLE SWANSON
10
Posting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
11/15/05
NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT
$21.26
TODD TEVLIN
11/21/05
GARCEAU HARDWARE AND POWE
$54.30
TODD TEVLIN
11/25/05
MENARDS 3059
$79.75
TODD TEVLIN
11/16/05
AMERICAN FLAGPOLE AND
$103.31
JOSEPH WATERS
11/14/05
TARGET 00006197
$5.99
SUSAN ZWIEG
11/17/05
TARGET 00006197
$42.59
SUSAN ZWIEG
11/18/05
LYNN CARD CO
$97.00
SUSAN ZWIEG
11/21/05
MINUTEMAN PRESS
$93.95
SUSAN ZWIEG
11/22/05
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$807.78
SUSAN ZWIEG
11/23/05
QUILL CORPORATION
$143.72
SUSAN ZWIEG
11/23/05
VIKING #1090
$226.81
SUSAN ZWIEG
$34,403.56
11
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
12
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
12/02/05
CARDINAL, ROBERT
422.42
dd
12/02/05
.IUENEMANN, KATHLEEN
371.77
dd
12/02/05
KOPPEN, MARVIN
371.77
dd
12/02/05
ROSSBACH, WILLIAM
371.77
dd
12/02/05
COLEMAN, MELINDA
4,271.10
dd
12/02/05
DARST, ROBERTA
1,809.50
dd
12/02/05
FURSMAN, RICHARD
5,053.62
dd
12/02/05
FARR, LARRY
1,767.48
dd
12/02/05
SWANSON, LYLE
1,662.77
dd
12/02/05
LE,.IENNIFER
108.00
dd
12/02/05
LE, SHERYL
4,126.34
dd
12/02/05
RAMEAUX, THERESE
2,376.42
dd
12/02/05
FAUST, DANIEL
4,291.97
dd
12/02/05
SCHMIDT, DEBORAH
1,526.97
dd
12/02/05
ANDERSON, CAROLE
937.02
dd
12/02/05
BAUMAN, GAYLE
3,434.43
dd
12/02/05
JACKSON, MARY
1,819.77
dd
12/02/05
KELSEY, CONNIE
950.99
dd
12/02/05
TETZLAFF,.IUDY
1,819.78
dd
12/02/05
FRY, PATRICIA
1,689.36
dd
12/02/05
GUILFOILE, KAREN
3,008.18
dd
12/02/05
MORSON,.IOHN
352.00
dd
12/02/05
OSTER, ANDREA
1,788.60
dd
12/02/05
CARLE,.IEANETTE
1,671.09
dd
12/02/05
.IAGOE, CAROL
1,661.35
dd
12/02/05
JOHNSON, BONNIE
848.98
dd
12/02/05
MECHELKE, SHERRIE
856.95
dd
12/02/05
MOY, PAMELA
800.04
dd
12/02/05
OLSON, SANDRA
1,206.59
dd
12/02/05
WEAVER, KRISTINE
1,787.76
dd
12/02/05
BANICK,.IOHN
3,871.15
dd
12/02/05
CORCORAN, THERESA
1,629.35
dd
12/02/05
POWELL, PHILIP
2,267.65
dd
12/02/05
RICHIE, CAROLE
1,636.28
dd
12/02/05
SPANGLER, EDNA
308.00
dd
12/02/05
THOMALLA, DAVID
4,297.90
dd
12/02/05
ABEL, CLINT
2,638.97
dd
12/02/05
ALDRIDGE, MARK
2,517.20
dd
12/02/05
ANDREWS, SCOTT
3,476.14
dd
12/02/05
BAKKE, LONN
2,440.39
dd
12/02/05
BELDE, STANLEY
2,812.73
dd
12/02/05
BIERDEMAN, BRIAN
2,733.35
dd
12/02/05
BOHL,.IOHN
2,713.36
dd
12/02/05
BUSACK, DANIEL
2,402.31
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
12
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
13
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
12/02/05
COFFEY, KEVIN
2,632.74
dd
12/02/05
CROTTY, KERRY
2,623.45
dd
12/02/05
DOBLAR, RICHARD
2,930.21
dd
12/02/05
DUNN, ALICE
2,350.02
dd
12/02/05
GABRIEL, ANTHONY
1,967.53
dd
12/02/05
HEINZ, STEPHEN
2,918.13
dd
12/02/05
HILBERT, STEVEN
3,496.51
dd
12/02/05
JOHNSON, KEVIN
4,133.46
dd
12/02/05
KALKA, THOMAS
636.28
dd
12/02/05
KARTS, FLINT
2,946.77
dd
12/02/05
KONG, TOMMY
2,584.59
dd
12/02/05
KROLL, BRETT
2,300.00
dd
12/02/05
KVAM, DAVID
3,420.42
dd
12/02/05
LANGNER, TODD
1,662.46
dd
12/02/05
LU,.IOHNNIE
2,432.14
dd
12/02/05
MARINO,.IASON
2,571.28
dd
12/02/05
MARTIN,.IERROLD
2,442.49
dd
12/02/05
MCCARTY, GLEN
2,342.62
dd
12/02/05
METRY, ALESIA
2,795.77
dd
12/02/05
NYE, MICHAEL
1,915.64
dd
12/02/05
OLSON,.IULIE
2,373.74
dd
12/02/05
RABBETT, KEVIN
3,483.05
dd
12/02/05
RHUDE, MATTHEW
1,635.75
dd
12/02/05
STEFFEN, SCOTT
3,616.77
dd
12/02/05
STEINER,.IOSEPH
666.68
dd
12/02/05
SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM
1,801.02
dd
12/02/05
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS
2,767.13
dd
12/02/05
WENZEL,.IAY
2,331.55
dd
12/02/05
XIONG, KAO
2,500.27
dd
12/02/05
BARTZ, PAUL
3,055.27
dd
12/02/05
BERGERON,.IOSEPH
3,081.55
dd
12/02/05
DUGAS, MICHAEL
2,823.70
dd
12/02/05
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA
2,482.65
dd
12/02/05
FLOR, TIMOTHY
2,858.26
dd
12/02/05
FRASER,.IOHN
3,039.94
dd
12/02/05
LANGNER, SCOTT
2,154.04
dd
12/02/05
PALMA, STEVEN
2,950.30
dd
12/02/05
THEISEN, PAUL
2,154.04
dd
12/02/05
THIENES, PAUL
2,439.28
dd
12/02/05
CARLSON, BRIAN
2,554.35
dd
12/02/05
DAWSON, RICHARD
3,267.22
dd
12/02/05
DUELLMAN, KIRK
2,538.20
dd
12/02/05
EVERSON,PAUL
2,522.97
dd
12/02/05
HALWEG,.IODI
2,208.40
dd
12/02/05
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
2,977.20
dd
12/02/05
MYERS, TODD
2,719.70
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
13
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
14
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
12/02/05
NOVAK,.IEROME
3,180.00
dd
12/02/05
PARSONS, KURT
2,708.01
dd
12/02/05
PETERSON, ROBERT
3,375.70
dd
12/02/05
PRECHTEL, ROBERT
2,998.25
dd
12/02/05
SVENDSEN, RONALD
3,244.90
dd
12/02/05
GERVAIS -.IR, CLARENCE
2,785.12
dd
12/02/05
BAUER, MICHELLE
2,408.92
dd
12/02/05
FLAUGHER,.IAYME
2,649.50
dd
12/02/05
HERMANSON, CHAD
2,455.90
dd
12/02/05
HUBIN, KENNARD
2,626.03
dd
12/02/05
KNAPP, BRETT
1,888.90
dd
12/02/05
LINN, BRYAN
2,447.20
dd
12/02/05
PACOLT, MARSHA
2,456.34
dd
12/02/05
RABINE,.IANET
2,226.32
dd
12/02/05
STAHNKE,.IULIE
2,240.11
dd
12/02/05
LUKIN, STEVEN
3,899.17
dd
12/02/05
SVENDSEN, RUSTIN
3,125.43
dd
12/02/05
ZWIEG, SUSAN
1,826.51
dd
12/02/05
DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT
284.84
dd
12/02/05
AHL, R. CHARLES
4,544.68
dd
12/02/05
BREHEIM, ROGER
1,844.37
dd
12/02/05
GROHS,.IUDITH
1,769.08
dd
12/02/05
KONEWKO, DUWAYNE
2,970.52
dd
12/02/05
NIVEN,AMY
1,276.22
dd
12/02/05
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
2,601.26
dd
12/02/05
BRINK, TROY
1,719.75
dd
12/02/05
DEBILZAN, THOMAS
2,039.90
dd
12/02/05
EDGE, DOUGLAS
2,023.90
dd
12/02/05
.ZONES, DONALD
2,240.80
dd
12/02/05
MEYER, GERALD
1,921.79
dd
12/02/05
NAGEL, BRYAN
2,298.96
dd
12/02/05
OSWALD, ERICK
2,043.68
dd
12/02/05
RUNNING, ROBERT
1,908.15
dd
12/02/05
TEVLIN, TODD
1,884.65
dd
12/02/05
DUCHARME,.IOHN
2,345.26
dd
12/02/05
ENGSTROM, ANDREW
1,646.15
dd
12/02/05
ISAKSON, CHAD
242.56
dd
12/02/05
JACOBSON, SCOTT
1,570.16
dd
12/02/05
KNUTSON, LOIS
1,354.90
dd
12/02/05
LABEREE, ERIN
4,012.30
dd
12/02/05
LINDBLOM, RANDAL
2,345.26
dd
12/02/05
PECK, DENNIS
2,352.19
dd
12/02/05
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
2,347.78
dd
12/02/05
VERMEERSCH, CHARLES
5,360.28
dd
12/02/05
ANDERSON, BRUCE
4,237.32
dd
12/02/05
CAREY, HEIDI
2,076.55
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
14
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
15
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
12/02/05
HALL, KATHLEEN
1,766.77
dd
12/02/05
LUND, ERIC
120.00
dd
12/02/05
MARUSKA, MARK
2,674.70
dd
12/02/05
NAUGHTON,.IOHN
1,719.75
dd
12/02/05
SCHINDELDECKER,.IAMES
1,842.06
dd
12/02/05
BIESANZ, OAKLEY
1,440.44
dd
12/02/05
HAYMAN,.IANET
1,000.25
dd
12/02/05
HUTCHINSON, ANN
2,262.70
dd
12/02/05
NELSON,.IEAN
1,029.69
dd
12/02/05
SEEGER, GERALD
2,286.94
dd
12/02/05
GAYNOR,VIRGINIA
2,075.51
dd
12/02/05
EKSTRAND, THOMAS
3,043.04
dd
12/02/05
KROLL, LISA
1,228.24
dd
12/02/05
LIVINGSTON,.IOYCE
1,137.32
dd
12/02/05
SINDT, ANDREA
1,647.75
dd
12/02/05
THOMPSON, DEBRA
453.84
dd
12/02/05
YOUNG, TAMELA
1,523.75
dd
12/02/05
FINWALL, SHANN
2,208.00
dd
12/02/05
ROBERTS, KENNETH
2,481.42
dd
12/02/05
CARVER, NICHOLAS
2,770.29
dd
12/02/05
FISHER, DAVID
3,276.22
dd
12/02/05
RICE, MICHAEL
1,954.95
dd
12/02/05
SWAN, DAVID
2,050.95
dd
12/02/05
SWETT, PAUL
1,500.55
dd
12/02/05
WORK, ALICIA
299.63
dd
12/02/05
FINN, GREGORY
2,213.26
dd
12/02/05
FRANK, PETER
100.00
dd
12/02/05
GALLANT, CHARLENE
232.00
dd
12/02/05
GRAF, MICHAEL
1,941.83
dd
12/02/05
KELLY, LISA
1,231.91
dd
12/02/05
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
274.12
dd
12/02/05
ROBBINS, AUDRA
2,116.03
dd
12/02/05
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
334.75
dd
12/02/05
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS
2,854.34
dd
12/02/05
UNDERHILL, KRISTEN
194.00
dd
12/02/05
GERMAIN, DAVID
1,848.99
dd
12/02/05
NORDQUIST, RICHARD
1,839.75
dd
12/02/05
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
2,160.19
dd
12/02/05
ANZALDI, MANDY
1,629.15
dd
12/02/05
COLEMAN, PHILIP
405.50
dd
12/02/05
COLLINS, ASHLEY
128.00
dd
12/02/05
CRAWFORD -.IR, RAYMOND
243.00
dd
12/02/05
CROSSON, LINDA
2,610.43
dd
12/02/05
DREWES, DEENA
44.40
dd
12/02/05
EVANS, CHRISTINE
743.52
dd
12/02/05
HOFMEISTER, MARY
634.55
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
15
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
M
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
12/02/05
PEL000IN, PENNYE
685.57
dd
12/02/05
SCHMIDT, RUSSELL
2,026.22
dd
12/02/05
SCHULZE, BRIAN
775.99
dd
12/02/05
STAPLES, PAULINE
2,940.03
dd
12/02/05
ZIELINSKEJUDY
38.85
dd
12/02/05
ANDREA,.IOHANNA
40.50
dd
12/02/05
BENDTSEN, LISA
59.70
dd
12/02/05
BRENEMAN, NEIL
450.86
dd
12/02/05
BRUSOE, CRISTINA
52.50
dd
12/02/05
BUCKLEY, BRITTANY
73.00
dd
12/02/05
DUNN, RYAN
744.84
dd
12/02/05
ERICKSON- CLARK, CAROL
67.80
dd
12/02/05
ESTRADA, KIEL
40.00
dd
12/02/05
EVANS, KRISTIN
84.00
dd
12/02/05
FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA
23.80
dd
12/02/05
FONTAINE, KIM
699.23
dd
12/02/05
HALEY, BROOKE
65.10
dd
12/02/05
HAWBAKER, EVAN
39.60
dd
12/02/05
HORWATH, RONALD
1,996.55
dd
12/02/05
KOEHNEN, AMY
127.25
dd
12/02/05
KOEHNEN, MARY
1,247.61
dd
12/02/05
KRONHOLM, KATHRYN
542.07
dd
12/02/05
MATHEWS, LEAH
94.50
dd
12/02/05
NELSON, SIERRA
163.53
dd
12/02/05
OVERBY,ANNA
80.00
dd
12/02/05
PROESCH, ANDY
409.95
dd
12/02/05
SCHAEFER, ANDREA
23.63
dd
12/02/05
SMITH, ANN
189.50
dd
12/02/05
TUPY, HEIDE
161.60
dd
12/02/05
TUPY, MARCUS
243.50
dd
12/02/05
WERNER, REBECCA
56.70
dd
12/02/05
WOLFGRAM, MARY
107.75
dd
12/02/05
GROPPOLI, LINDA
268.80
dd
12/02/05
BEHAN,.IAMES
1,658.15
dd
12/02/05
LONETTEJAMES
1,046.82
dd
12/02/05
PATTERSON,ALBERT
1,281.80
dd
12/02/05
PRINS, KELLY
988.62
dd
12/02/05
REILLY, MICHAEL
1,626.95
dd
12/02/05
SCHOENECKER, LEIGH
79.80
dd
12/02/05
AICHELE, CRAIG
1,885.36
dd
12/02/05
PRIEM, STEVEN
2,126.26
dd
12/02/05
WOEHRLE, MATTHEW
1,599.86
dd
12/02/05
BERGO, CHAD
2,276.71
dd
12/02/05
FOWLDS, MYCHAL
2,085.54
dd
12/02/05
FRANZEN, NICHOLAS
1,954.85
dd
12/02/05
HURLEY, STEPHEN
3,401.22
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
M
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
17
CHECK 4
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
103361
12/02/05
JAHN, DAVID
1,592.46
wf
103362
12/02/05
MORIN,TROY
199.50
wf
103363
12/02/05
MATHEYS, ALANA
1,999.02
wf
103364
12/02/05
HANSEN, LORI
1,863.06
wf
103365
12/02/05
HULET,.IEANETTE
144.50
wf
103366
12/02/05
PALANK, MARY
1,631.66
wf
103367
12/02/05
SVENDSEN,.IOANNE
1,803.40
wf
103368
12/02/05
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
4,228.42
wf
103369
12/02/05
WELCHLIN, CABOT
2,755.08
wf
103370
12/02/05
FREBERG, RONALD
1,877.88
wf
103371
12/02/05
.IAROSCH,.IONATHAN
231.20
wf
103372
12/02/05
EDSON,DAVID
2,050.06
wf
103373
12/02/05
HELEY, ROLAND
1,877.88
wf
103374
12/02/05
HINNENKAMP, GARY
2,006.21
wf
103375
12/02/05
LINDORFF, DENNIS
1,844.37
wf
103376
12/02/05
NOVAK, MICHAEL
1,804.55
wf
103377
12/02/05
BERGREN, KIRSTEN
36.56
wf
103378
12/02/05
GERNES, CAROLE
281.25
wf
103379
12/02/05
SOUTTER, CHRISTINE
155.00
wf
103380
12/02/05
DANNER, BRENDA
303.75
wf
103381
12/02/05
BERGER, STEPHANIE
262.00
wf
103382
12/02/05
BRYANT, KAYLIE
108.00
wf
103383
12/02/05
DALY, KERRY
60.00
wf
103384
12/02/05
DICKEY, TANYA
8.00
wf
103385
12/02/05
ERICKSON, AMY
120.00
wf
103386
12/02/05
GREER, ABIGAIL
108.00
wf
103387
12/02/05
KELLY,.IAMIE
42.00
wf
103388
12/02/05
KOHLMAN,.IENNIFER
96.00
wf
103389
12/02/05
KYRK, HALEY
60.00
wf
103390
12/02/05
MUELLNER, CHRISTOPHER
60.00
wf
103391
12/02/05
NETTLETON, NICOLE
96.00
wf
103392
12/02/05
NYBERG, MICHELLE
96.00
wf
103393
12/02/05
OLSON, KRISTIN
48.00
wf
103394
12/02/05
ROBBINS, EMERALD
84.00
wf
103395
12/02/05
SHOBERG, KART
123.75
wf
103396
12/02/05
SWANSON, AMANDA
68.00
wf
103397
12/02/05
HAAG, MARK
1,770.15
wf
103398
12/02/05
NADEAU, EDWARD
2,972.99
wf
103399
12/02/05
GLASS,.IEAN
1,814.45
wf
103400
12/02/05
HER, CHONG
433.50
wf
103401
12/02/05
NAGEL, BROOKE
368.13
wf
103402
12/02/05
TOLBERT, FRANCINE
310.00
wf
103403
12/02/05
ANDERSON, CALEB
22.35
wf
103404
12/02/05
ANDERSON,.IOSHUA
113.83
wf
103405
12/02/05
ANDERSON,.IUSTIN
103.55
wf
103406
12/02/05
ARNEVIK, ERICA
35.00
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
17
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
18
CHECK 4
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
103407
12/02/05
BRENEMAN, SEAN
95.13
wf
103408
12/02/05
CANTLON, COLLEEN
34.88
wf
103409
12/02/05
CLARK, PAMELA
51.00
wf
103410
12/02/05
COSTA,.IOSEPH
150.90
wf
103411
12/02/05
DEMPSEY, BETH
93.20
wf
103412
12/02/05
FENGER,.IUSTIN
331.46
wf
103413
12/02/05
GRANT, MELISSA
309.00
wf
103414
12/02/05
GRUEN IAGEN, LINDA
531.90
wf
103415
12/02/05
HAGSTROM, EMILY
159.88
wf
103416
12/02/05
HEINN, REBECCA
36.00
wf
103417
12/02/05
KROLL, MARK
99.00
wf
103418
12/02/05
LEMAY, KATHERINE
27.00
wf
103419
12/02/05
LUTZ, CHRISTINA
156.50
wf
103420
12/02/05
MORIS, RACHEL
23.63
wf
103421
12/02/05
NWANOKWALE, MORDY
119.13
wf
103422
12/02/05
RICHTER, NANCY
189.00
wf
103423
12/02/05
RYDEEN, ARIEL
164.00
wf
103424
12/02/05
SCHMIDT, EMILY
88.46
wf
103425
12/02/05
SCHOMMER, SUMMERS
68.75
wf
103426
12/02/05
SCHRAMM, BRITTANY
22.50
wf
103427
12/02/05
SIMPSON, KIMBERLYN
75.65
wf
103428
12/02/05
SIVALD, SHANNON
130.50
wf
103429
12/02/05
SMITLEY, SHARON
263.45
wf
103430
12/02/05
STAHNKE, AMY
112.68
wf
103431
12/02/05
TRUE, ANDREW
65.10
wf
103432
12/02/05
WARNER, CAROLYN
265.45
wf
103433
12/02/05
WEDES, CARYL
140.10
wf
103434
12/02/05
WHITE, NICOLE
820.02
wf
103435
12/02/05
WILLIAMS, KRISTINE
92.25
wf
103436
12/02/05
WOODMAN, ALICE
199.60
wf
103437
12/02/05
BOSLEY, CAROL
271.90
wf
103438
12/02/05
KELLY, BRYAN
136.50
wf
103439
12/02/05
KELLY, MICHAEL
168.00
wf
103440
12/02/05
LEWIS, AMY
126.00
wf
103441
12/02/05
ODDEN,.IESSICA
112.09
wf
103442
12/02/05
OIL, REBECCA
165.89
wf
103443
12/02/05
PARAYNO, GUAI
192.18
wf
103444
12/02/05
SATTLER, MELINDA
75.90
wf
103445
12/02/05
STODGHILL, AMANDA
107.63
wf
103446
12/02/05
VAN HALE, PAULA
132.60
wf
103447
12/02/05
ANDERSON, MATT
56.53
wf
103448
12/02/05
BALDWIN,.IANA
95.88
wf
103449
12/02/05
BERLIN, SARAH
57.15
wf
103450
12/02/05
BIRKHOLZ, TYLER
127.00
wf
103451
12/02/05
BOYD, DANIEL
25.40
wf
103452
12/02/05
DOUGLASS, TOM
1,340.73
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
18
19
CHECK 4
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
103453
12/02/05
GADOW, ANNA
53.98
wf
103454
12/02/05
HER, PHENG
143.00
wf
103455
12/02/05
O'GRADY, VICTORIA
118.15
wf
103456
12/02/05
OLSON, CHRISTINE
65.53
wf
103457
12/02/05
SIMPSON,.IOSEPH
296.10
wf
103458
12/02/05
THEESFELD, CALEB
55.60
wf
103459
12/02/05
YANG, HUE
38.93
wf
103460
12/02/05
YANG, KAY
62.55
wf
103461
12/02/05
YANG, TIM
162.75
wf
103462
12/02/05
VUE, LOR PAO
265.03
470,466.26
19
AGENDA NO. H -2
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director and Community Development Director
RE: INCREASE IN PLANNING FEES (Second Reading)
DATE: December 6, 2005
On November 21 the City Council approved first reading of an ordinance to
increase planning fees effective 1 -1 -06. Attached is a copy of the agenda report
from that meeting.
It is recommended that second reading of the attached ordinance (Exhibit B) be
approved.
P \agn \userfeescomdev2nd.doc
AGENDA NQ
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director and Community Development Director
E: INCREASE IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SERVICE
CHARGES
GATE: November 10, 2005
V, .Intff. *1 - awst s
It is proposed that the Community Development Department service charges be increased by
effective January 1, 2006
fk'AGRUAGN1USER.rEE c0:EEc
FEE
Zone Change
Conditional Use Permit - Single or Double- Dwelling
Conditional Use Permit - Other
Conditional Use Permit Revisions - Single or Double Dwelling
Conditional Use Permit Revisions - Other
Home Occupation
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Variance - Single or Double- Dwelling
Variance - Other
Variance - Front Yard Setback
Preliminary Plat
Community Design Review Board
Community Design Review Board
Planned Unit Development
Temporary Sign Permit
Wall Signs
Free Standing Signs
Double Dwelling
15 Day Design Review
2003
2003
INCREASE
FEE
Full Cost
INCREASE
TIMES 20%
776.00
1,654.48
878.48
176.00
232.00
1,505.63
1,273.63
255.00
825.00
1,645.85
820.85
164.00
46.00
1,505.63
1,459.63
292.00
165.00
1,734.98
1,569.98
314.00
165.00
1,344.97
1,179.97
236.00
1,130.00
1,717.48
587.48
117.00
152.00
1,344.97
1,192.97
239.00
848.00
1,344.97
496.97
99.00
152.00
516.60
364.60
73.00
1,400.00
1,990.58
590.58
118.00
187.00
1,532.60
1,345.60
269.00
152.00
473.60
321.60
64.00
1,250.00
2,654.28
1,404.28
281.00
24.00
44.15
20.15
4.00
24.00
101.59
77.59
16.00
24.00
169.43
145.43
29.00
In 2004 the Council approved a recommendation that the large increases needed in these 17 fees
be phased in over the five -year period of 2005 -2009. Therefore, beginning in 2005, 20% of the
increase needed to cover the full cost was added to the fee rates.
Also, all other Community Development Department fees should be increased by 2.0% to keep up
with inflation. All of the Community Development Department license /permit fees and services
charges are listed in Exhibit A which lists the present fee and the proposed 2006 fees. The 17
fees that were in the 2004 user fee study are in bold with the 2006 fee increase at one -fifth of the
increase listed in the user fee study.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council approve (1) increases in the Community Development
Department fees as listed in Exhibit A effective January 1, 2006 and (2) approve first reading of
an ordinance (Exhibit B) to increase the planning fees.
P: \WORDWGN \USERFEE CD.DOC
November 10, 2005 3
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 3
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Service Charges
Estimated
Fee
Annual
2004
2005
2006
Volume
Fee
Fee
Fee
PLANNING FEES (Set by Ordinance)
Zone Change *
8
788
952
1,128
Conditional Use Permit:
R1 and R2 *
1
236
487
742
Other *
11
838
989
1,153
Conditional Use Permit Revision:
R1 and R2 *
6
47
338
630
Other*
8
168
479
793
Variances:
R1 and R2 *
6
154
391
630
Other*
6
862
947
1,046
Front Yard Setback *
1
154
225
298
Vacations:
R1 and R2 *
10
148
150
153
Other*
2
576
583
595
Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created):
R1 and R2
11
82
83
85
Other
1
307
311
317
Home Occupations
Initial Permit
6
168
401
637
Annual Renewal
6
55
56
57
Sign Erection Permit (per inspection)
100
24
24
24
Temporary Sign Permit
30
24
28
32
Wall Sign Permit
50
24
40
56
Free Standing Signs
13
24
53
82
Comprehensive Plan Amendment *
8
1,148
1,247
1,364
*Plus a surcharge for each affected property to pay for the County's filing fee for resolutions.
P:\EXCEL\MISC\FEES
11/10/2005 4
Exhibit A
Page 2 of 3
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Service Charges
Fee
Estimated
Annual
Volume
2004
Fee
2005
Fee
2006
Fee
Code Amendment
1
862
873
890
Planned Unit Development *
8
1,270
1,531
1,812
Preliminary Plat
8
1,420
1,518
1,636
Preliminary Plat Revision or Time Extension
9
224
227
232
Final Plat
5
386
391
399
Time Extensions /Renewals
9
141
143
146
LICENSES DUE JANUARY 1st
Commercial Fertilizer Application License
114
115
117
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES
Woodlot Alteration Permit
1
14
14
14
Building Relocation
5
823
834
851
Moving Permit
3
53
54
55
Community Design Review Board:
R1 & R2
15 Day Design Review
Revision
Other
8
1
3
16
190
154
0
693
456
216
190
702
725
280
194
716
Mobile Home Permit
1
41
42
43
On -Site Sewage Systems
6
67
68
69
Truth -In- Housing Filing Fee
100
31
31
32
Truth -In- Housing Evaluators License
29
106
107
109
Zoning Compliance Letter
24
24
24
Project Notification Sign
12
100
101
103
Front Yard Setback Authorization
0
154
157
Minor Construction Project
0
154
157
*Plus a surcharge for each affected property to pay for the County's filing fee for resolutions.
P:\EXCEL\MISC\FEES
11/10/2005 5
Exhibit A
Page 3 of 3
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Service Charges
Fee
Estimated
Annual
Volume
2004
Fee
2005
Fee
2006
Fee
PUBLICATIONS (Includes Sales Tax):
Zoning Code
6
6
6
Platting Code
3
3
3
Sign Code
3
3
3
Comprehensive Plan
15
15
15
Zoning Map
11
11
11
City Map
3
3
3
Section Map
3
3
3
Planning Commission or Community
Design Review Board:
Minutes - Per Year
Agenda Packet - Per Year
Property Owner List
15
114
66
15
115
67
15
117
68
*Plus a surcharge for each affected property to pay for the County's filing fee for resolutions.
P:\EXCEL\MISC\FEES
11/10/2005 6
ORDINANCE NO.
PLANNING FEES
Section 1. Section 36 - 26 of the Zoning Code of the City of Maplewood is hereby amended as follow
Section 36 - 26. Fees. The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required:
Zone Change
1,128
Conditional Use Permit:
R1 & R2
742
Other
1,153
Conditional Use Permit Revision:
R1 & R2
630
Other
793
Variances:
R1 & R2
630
Other
1,046
Front Yard Setback
298
Vacations:
R1 & R2
153
Other
595
Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created):
R1 & R2
85
Other
317
Home Occupation Permit (initial permit)
Initial permit
637
Annual permit
57
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
1,364
Code Amendment
890
Planned Unit Development
1,812
Preliminary Plat
1,636
Preliminary Plat Revision or Time Extension
232
Final Plat
399
Time Extensions /Renewals
146
Section 2. Section 36 - 258 of the sign code is amended as follows:
Section 36 - 258. Fees.
(1) The sign erection permit fee shall be $24 (per inspection)
Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective on January 12006
Passed by the Maplewood City Council on
Attest:
2005
Mayor
Ayes --
Clerk Nayes --
Exhibit B
7
r G T e 1 A 0 10 7 G 10 [. �: 1991
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: INCREASE IN MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES
DATE: December 6. 2005
INTRODUCTION
It is proposed that the attached miscellaneous service charges be increased by 2.0%
effective January 1, 2006.
- 7eT83:(rl:Zo1ll. U]
It has been past practice to raise service charges annually to keep up with inflation.
Attached is a listing of present and proposed fees. The proposed fees represent a
2.0% increase as anticipated in the 2006 Proposed Budget. Most fees are rounded off
to the nearest $1 except for fees in excess of $1,000 which are rounded off to the
nearest $10. Excluded from this report are Community Development Department and
R.E.A.L. Department service charges as these fees are covered in separate reports.
INx8101MIMI:Iki U7e [a]ki I
It is recommended that the Council increase the attached miscellaneous service
charges by 2.0% effective January 1, 2006 to keep up with inflation.
Attachment
P:MORDWGNWSERFEE MISC.DOC
GENERAL SERVICE CHARGES
2004
2005
2006
Fee
Fee
Fee
Dog /Cat Impound Fee
$35
$35
$36
Fire Dept. False Alarm Charge °
100 -400
100 -400
100 -400
Police Dept. False Alarm Charge a
25 -100
25 -100
25 -100
Occupancy Permit
13
13
13
Police Accident Report Copies
5
0.25 /page
0.25 /page
Fire Report Copies
5
0.25 /page
0.25 /page
Fire Inspection of Businesses and Apartments:
Structures under 10,000 sq. ft.
0
50
51
Structures under 10,000 - 50,000 sq. ft.
0
100
102
Structures over 50,000 sq. ft.
0
150
153
Re- inspection ( third and up)
0
100
102
Fire Inspection of Day Care /Foster Care Facilities
45
46
47
Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Financing - Commercial:
Amount Paid with Application (non - refundable)
3,220
3,260
3,330
Base Charge (% of bond issue)
1%
1%
1%
Maximum (in addition to application fee) b
28,600
28,600
28,600
Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Financing - Residential
(multiple - family dwellings):
Amount Paid with Application (non - refundable)
3,220
3,260
3,330
Base Charge (% of bond issue)
1%
1%
1%
Maximum (in addition to application fee) °
28,600
28,600
28,600
Tax Increment Financing: Application Fee (non - refundable)
6,410
6,490
6,620
Tax Abatement Financing: Application Fee
6,410
6,490
6,620
*No application fee on refinancing bonds.
a Set by ordinance adopted 8 -28 -95
b Set by Council on 9 -23 -96
° Set by ordinance adopted 12 -17 -01
P: \Finance \Excel \Misc \FE E_M ISC
11/10/2005
2
AGENDA NO. H -4
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: FINANCIAL TRANSFERS FOR UNASSESSED
IMPROVEMENTS
DATE: December 6, 2005
Transfers are made annually from the Sanitary Sewer Fund and the Water
Availability Charge Fund -St. Paul Water District to the Debt Service Fund for the
costs of unassessed sanitary sewer and water improvements. When the tax levy
for 2005 was adopted, a reduction was made in the debt service tax levy for the
anticipated transfers scheduled for 2005.
Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council authorize the following: (1) a
$31,140 transfer from the Sanitary Sewer Fund to the Debt Service Fund for the
2003 Sewer Revenue Bonds, (2) a $33,460 transfer from the Water Availability
Charge Fund -St. Paul Water District to the Debt Service Fund for the 2002
Improvement Refunding Bonds, and (3) the appropriate budget changes.
P \agn \unassessed
AGENDA NO. H -5
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: ASSESSMENTS FOR FALSE ALARM BILLS
DATE: December 6, 2005
The alarm ordinance adopted by the Council on 8 -28 -95 includes a provision
that unpaid false alarm charges shall be certified as special assessments.
On November 10 six letters were sent advising companies that their unpaid
invoice(s) for false alarm charges would be added to their property tax bill
for next year if payment was not made by November 30. One of these
invoices was paid.
The remaining unpaid bills that should be certified as special assessments
are as follows:
$ 800.00 for Spudsters at 3001 White Bear Avenue
$ 50.00 for Corner Kick at 1357 Cope Avenue
$ 25.00 for Ohlson Property Maintenance at 3224 Rice Street
$ 40.00 for Best Buy at 1885 County Road D
It is recommended that 1) the attached resolution be approved to certify
these false alarm charges for collection with property taxes payable in 2006
and 2) a $25.00 false alarm bill for Tom Ward at 2563 Oakridge Court be
written off as he has moved.
P \perm \FALSE ALARMS. DOC
RESOLUTION
RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the following delinquent false alarm
charge for collection with the taxes of said property owner for the year 2005,
collectible in 2006, and which includes interest at the rate of eight percent
(8 %) on the total amount for one year:
ACCOUNT
STREET ADDRESS
PROPERTY
IDENTIFICATION
AMOUNT*
Spudsters
3001 White Bear Avenue
02.29.22.23.0009
$864.00
Corner Kick
1357 Cope Avenue
10.29.22.32.0014
54.00
Ohlson Property Maintenance
3224 Rice Street
31.30.22.33.0052
27.00
Best Buy
1885 County Road D
35.30.22.33.0021
43.20
TOTAL
$ 988.20
*Amount includes 8% interest.
G
AGENDA NO. H -6
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: Assessments for Unpaid Ambulance Bills for 1999 -2005
DATE: December 6, 2005
PROPOSAL
It is proposed that the attached resolution be adopted to certify $19,443.18 of
unpaid ambulance bills as special assessments for collection with 2006 property
taxes with interest at the rate of eight percent on the total amount for one year.
BACKGROUND
Annually in December special assessments are levied for unpaid ambulance bills
on property within Ramsey County. During the past 12 months letters were sent
to individuals that had unpaid ambulance bills. The letters indicated that the
balance due for ambulance services along with 8% interest would be added to
their 2006 property taxes if payment was not made within 30 days. In response
to these letters, payments and /or insurance data were received. For the
remaining unpaid bills, property records were reviewed to confirm that the
property owner name matched the ambulance service customer name. There
were 26 matches and these are listed on the attachment for certification.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted to certify $19,443.18
of unpaid ambulance bills as special assessments for collection with 2006
property taxes with interest at the rate of eight percent on the total amount for one
year.
P \ag n \assess m ents_a m b_bills
RESOLUTION
RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to
the Auditor of Ramsey County the attached ambulance service charges totaling
$19,443.18 for collection with the taxes of said property owner for the year 2005,
collectible in 2006 with interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) on the total
amount for one year.
P \ag n \assess m ents_a m b_bills
CERTIFIED RECORD COPY (COUNTY) AMBULANCE CHARGES ASSESSMENT RECORD
Name of City CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MN
Rupert Name AMBULANCE CHARGES Update Change" 12/06/05
Des, of End. Unpaid Ambulance Fees
Spec. Asmnt Code 57061202
RES# xx- xx -xxx
Total Amur of End. as levied $19,443.18
Yr. To Stan Asmnt. 2006
No. Yrs. Asmnt. Run 1
Interest Rate
Deio. Method 0
Extra days 8 Mo. 1st Yr. 0
Li ne No.
p
i
m
V
v
m
o
rc
V
4
.
K
r
m
2
Y
C
s
a
s.
Y
3
F
u
C
a
Y
s
x
Y
a
x
o
.
Y
at
o
12
K
° w
to
s.
2
w
o
U.
1
57061202
0
R
102922130075
2006
1
1,093.37
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
2
57061202
0
R
252922330021
2006
1
1,182.60
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
3
57061202
0
R
222922120064
2006
1
1,208.52
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
4
57061202
0
R
343022430124
2006
1
427.03
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
5
57061202
0
R
232922430087
2006
1
198.50
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
6
57061202
0
R
242822340008
2006
1
1,897.56
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
7
57061202
0
R
162922440070
2006
1
1,141.56
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
8
57061202
0
R
112922220039
2006
1
261.79
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
9
57061202
0
R
192922440027
2006
1
430.251
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
10
57061202
0
R
182922420058
2006
1
838.62
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
11
57061202
0
R
122922410008
2006
1
223.01
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
12
57061202
0
R
122922430025
2006
1
199.00
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
13
57061202
0
R
142922410010
2006
1
1,147.20
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
14
57061202
0
R
112922340005
2006
1
684.29
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
15
57061202
0
R
252922420017
2006
1
926.64
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
16
57061202
0
R
122822130044
2006
1
766.71
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
17
57061202
0
R
222922420061
2006
1
120.44
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
18
57061202
0
R
092922240012
2006
1
1,895.251
1 0
01
I 0
0
N
N
N
N
19
57061202
0
R
0757M31115
2006
1
107.64
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
20
57061202
0
R
0757M00007
2006
1
202.69
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
21
57061202
0
R
012922210019
2006
1
715.93
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
22
57061202
0
R
012922220052
2006
1
1,140.48
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
23
57061202
0
R
152922320010
2006
1
884.52
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
24
57061202
0
R
032922330038
2006
1
780.26
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
25
57061202
0
R
152922330069
2006
1
642.51
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
26
57061202
0
R
252923140113
2006
1
326.81
0
01
0
0
N
N
N
N
TOTAL= 19,443.18
1 hereby certify that the above information is a true and accurate record of the unpaid ambulance charges assessment roll as adopted by the Maplewood City Council.
Karen Guilfoile Date
City Clerk, City of Maplewood, Minnesota
W
AGENDA NO. H -7
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: WRITE OFF UNCOLLECTIBLE AMBULANCE BILLS FOR 2003
DATE: December 6, 2005
PROPOSAL
It is proposed that the uncollectible 2003 ambulance bills in the amount of $610,112.57 be written
off and that the Finance Director be authorized to make these writes off annually.
BACKGROUND
The following four steps are used to collect payments on ambulance bills:
1. First Notice Ambulance charges are billed on a daily basis upon receipt of a run sheet. The first
notice requests: (1) payment in full unless covered by insurance, (2) insurance information and
consent forms for those having insurance.
2. Second Notice If the bill remains unpaid 30 days after the first bill, a second notice is sent to
those who have still not paid or did not send in requested insurance information.
Third Notice If the bill remains unpaid 60 days after the first bill, further attempts are made to
contact the patient and the hospital for information.
4. Final Notice If no contact can be made with the person billed, research is done to determine if
the amount due can be certified to the person's property taxes or collected using the Minnesota
Revenue Recapture Program. This program permits the City to receive payments by intercepting
income tax refunds, property tax credits or refunds, lottery winnings over $600 and political
campaign refunds.
5. If the bill remains unpaid, it is sent to a collection agency (American Accounts & Advisors, Inc.)
for collection. The collection agency writes up to four letters and makes phone calls. After 30
days, the collection agency calls us and asks for approval to send the unpaid accounts on to full
collection and possible court proceedings.
The 2003 ambulance bills proposed to be written off have been processed through these five steps.
Further collection efforts are not feasible.
P: MORD\AGN\UNCOLLEMBLE AMD 2005.doc
Steps taken over the past several years to improve collections have been:
1. Installed upgraded version of ambulance billing software.
2. Revised billing notices to minimize misunderstandings and achieve quicker follow -up.
3. Bill on a daily basis.
4. Bill all insurance.
The following graph shows the collection rates for 2000 — 2003.
AMBULANCE BILL COLLECTION
RATES AS OF 11 -30 -05
1 00.0%
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
84.9%
82.4%
73.3%
63.3%
2000 2001 2002 2003
P: \WORD AGN\UNCOLLEMBLE AMB 2005.doc 2
The following is a summary of transactions for ambulance services provided in 2003 compared to
2001 and 2002.
The uncollectible balance for 2003 is more than 2002 due to an increase in the ambulance rates and a
change in the Medicare law. Effective 04- 01 -02, Medicare began requiring all ambulance providers
to accept assignment. This law change prohibits the city from collecting the balance of the bill from
the patient. The City is limited to what Medicare allows. Last year the write off totaled $245,272.55
in the Medicare category. This year it has increased by over $181,000 to $426,748.03. If we had
been able to collect this difference, the write offs for 2003 would have been less than those for 2002.
We are continuing to use the procedure where the law allows us to levy assessments for unpaid
ambulance bills. We have certified $17,902.55 to property owners for collection with property
taxes.
An itemization of the uncollectible balance for 2003 is attached. The last page of the itemization
provides totals by category for the uncollectible balance. The following is an explanation of each
category:
CATEGORY
2001
2002
2003
Service Charges Billed
$1,252,897
$1,696,707
$1,758,336
Service Charges Paid
- 1,017,936
- 1,212,101
- 1,126,692
Service Charges Assessed/Certified
- 12,699
- 24,005
- 17,903
Time Pay Accounts
-404
-21
0
*Hardship Cancellations
-3,033
-3,677
-3,628
Uncollectible Balance
$218,825
$456,903
$610,113
Payments on Accounts Written Off
$1,795
$323
$1,321
The uncollectible balance for 2003 is more than 2002 due to an increase in the ambulance rates and a
change in the Medicare law. Effective 04- 01 -02, Medicare began requiring all ambulance providers
to accept assignment. This law change prohibits the city from collecting the balance of the bill from
the patient. The City is limited to what Medicare allows. Last year the write off totaled $245,272.55
in the Medicare category. This year it has increased by over $181,000 to $426,748.03. If we had
been able to collect this difference, the write offs for 2003 would have been less than those for 2002.
We are continuing to use the procedure where the law allows us to levy assessments for unpaid
ambulance bills. We have certified $17,902.55 to property owners for collection with property
taxes.
An itemization of the uncollectible balance for 2003 is attached. The last page of the itemization
provides totals by category for the uncollectible balance. The following is an explanation of each
category:
CATEGORY
EXPLANATION
Bankruptcy Write Off
Collection of ambulance bills for individuals that have
filed for banlauptcy is not possible because it is an
unsecured claim. However, ambulance bills are not put
in this category if it is covered by insurance or medical
assistance.
Collections Write Off
These are accounts on which our collection agencies
have exhausted all possible means of collection.
Crime Victim Write Off
Accounts where we have to accept assignment. We are
prohibited from collecting anything over the amount
approved.
Deceased Write Off
Accounts on which the patient is deceased and there is
no estate to bill.
Medical Assistance Write Off
Accounts where we have to accept assignment. We are
prohibited from collecting anything over the amount
approved.
Medicare Accounts where we have to accept assignment.
P: MORD \AGN\UNCOLLEMBLE AMD 2005.doc 3
Medicare made this mandatory effective 04- 01 -02.
MN Revenue Recapture These accounts have been sent to the Minnesota
Department of Revenue in order to receive payments by
intercepting refunds to patients. Collection of these
accounts is still possible but not probable.
Misc Balances Miscellaneous balance, i.e., less than $5.00 or incorrect
patient information prevents billing.
Veterans Write Off The city is required to accept what VA pays as payment
in full.
Workers' Comp Write Off The city is required to accept what Workers'
Compensation pays as payment in full.
Service charges usually increase annually due to increases in the billing rates. The billing rates for
2001 through 2003 were as follows:
The majority of the amount written off each year is required to be by law. We have exhausted all
avenues of collection on the remaining amounts. Since the annual write off of uncollectible
ambulance bills is a routine item without any viable alternatives, it is proposed that the Finance
Director be authorized to write off these uncollectible accounts annually if all the steps noted in this
report have been complied with.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the $610,112.57 of ambulance bills itemized in the attached exhibit be
written off as uncollectible and that the Finance Director be authorized to write off uncollectible
accounts annually.
*Under the procedure approved by the Council on March 10, 1997 (amended May 10, 1999), the
Finance Director is authorized to approve cancellations if the adjusted household income is under
185% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines and the liquid assets are under $3,000 for individuals and
$6,000 for couples. Cancellations in 2004 were $2,452.84 and in 2005 through October 31 were
$3,576.22.
P: MORD\AGN\UNCOLLEMBLE AMD 2005.doc Q
2001
2002
2003
Non - transport
$210
$210
$225
Basic Life Support — Resident
415
560
635
Basic Life Support — Non - Resident
440
585
665
Advanced Life Support I — Resident
710
850
870
Advanced Life Support I — Non - Resident
760
900
910
Advanced Life Support II — Resident
710
850
975
Advanced Life Support II — Non - Resident
760
900
1,025
Mileage (rate per mile)
9.65
10.40
11.30
The majority of the amount written off each year is required to be by law. We have exhausted all
avenues of collection on the remaining amounts. Since the annual write off of uncollectible
ambulance bills is a routine item without any viable alternatives, it is proposed that the Finance
Director be authorized to write off these uncollectible accounts annually if all the steps noted in this
report have been complied with.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the $610,112.57 of ambulance bills itemized in the attached exhibit be
written off as uncollectible and that the Finance Director be authorized to write off uncollectible
accounts annually.
*Under the procedure approved by the Council on March 10, 1997 (amended May 10, 1999), the
Finance Director is authorized to approve cancellations if the adjusted household income is under
185% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines and the liquid assets are under $3,000 for individuals and
$6,000 for couples. Cancellations in 2004 were $2,452.84 and in 2005 through October 31 were
$3,576.22.
P: MORD\AGN\UNCOLLEMBLE AMD 2005.doc Q
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
01001663A1
977817
ODENWALD, ROB
DECE
767.90
02000639A1
977817
ODENWALD, ROB
DECE
902.00
03000026A1
982185
WATKINS, DELIAA
MAWO
251.61
03000029A1
982208
JONES, WILLIE R
MAWO
492.44
03000048A1
971008
ZEIMET, BERNARD
MAWO
463.29
03000070Al
982211
LEDO, ALVINA V
MCWO
526.45
03000078A1
982213
PULLUM, PERIA H
MCWO
560.18
03000104A1
981202
KIRCHOFFNER, JOHN J
MCWO
532.70
03000131A1
982215
VANHAVERMAET, JOHN J
MCWO
343.12
03000139A1
982216
SCHNECK, EUGENE H
MCWO
566.45
03000163A1
982217
LOUGHREY, KAYLEIGH M
MAWO
538.27
03000178A1
982219
HUNTER, THOMAS
MNRR
194.34
030002llAl
982220
CHARPENTIER, JESSE J
MAWO
457.46
03000218A1
982227
BOYLES, PAUL J
AAA
676.30
03000232A1
978490
SCHMIDT, ELAINE M
MCWO
513.92
03000266A1
982221
GRENGS, HARRIETTE T
MCWO
564.01
03000280Al
982228
BELL, TYLER A
MAWO
239.95
03000300Al
982231
VANLANINGHAM, ELDON E
MCWO
454.16
03000340Al
982232
GERARD, RAY
MCWO
564.01
03000368A1
982235
MONIO, STEVEN B
MNRR
187.56
03000397A1
980980
JOHNSON, MELVIN R
MCWO
564.01
03000412A1
982236
BROADWAY, SANDRA L
MCWO
606.94
03000420Al
982237
PRAWER, DONALD D
MCWO
616.54
03000444A1
982238
BLOXSON, KRISTINA
MAWO
538.27
03000535A1
982243
MEYER, JOHN
MCWO
459.11
03000663A1
982119
MOELLER, GERALDINE
MCWO
570.28
03000667A1
982248
JACKSON, ADELINE F
MCWO
616.54
03000675A1
978985
KING, GLEN S
MCWO
520.15
03000679A1
982250
RYAN, THOMAS J
MCWO
421.64
03000683A1
982262
BEAUGARD, JAMES D
MAWO
222.46
03000690Al
982251
BUTLER, ELEANOR
MAWO
348.58
03000718A1
971106
ANDREWS, ALICE
MCWO
545.23
03000737A1
982264
OLATOYE, TOBIR
MAWO
280.76
03000773A1
982295
HANNIGAN, GORDON E
MCWO
532.70
03000777A1
982266
CARLSON, MARY V
MCWO
564.01
03000785A1
982257
GEBHARD, MARIAN K
MCWO
532.70
03000800Al
977439
KLOSSNER, SIGNE
MCWO
304.68
03000803A1
980889
BROWNING, DOROTHY H
MCWO
582.80
03000807A1
982497
VIZCEKY, KATHERINE
MAWO
474.95
03000832A1
982258
WHITAKER, EILEEN J
MCWO
538.97
03000857A1
982267
SHAFER, SHELDON C
MCWO
591.49
03000858A1
982215
VANHAVERMAET, JOHN J
MCWO
343.12
03000859A1
982268
STABENOW, FLORENCE H
MCWO
564.01
03000900Al
982272
EHRBRIGHT, MELISSA L
MNAA
138.30
03000909A1
971651
KRANTZ, HALEY
MNAA
1,115.40
03000910Al
974273
LONEY, LOUISE
MCWO
545.23
03000943A1
981412
TARUSCIO, AGNES L
MCWO
500.78
03000945A1
982283
LEWIS, GRIFFIN A
MNRR
46.65
03000947A1
982284
BYRNES, BRENDALEE M
MAWO
474.95
03000967A1
982286
GERBI, DIANA
WCWO
111.61
03000986A1
982287
COLAIZY, KATHRINE J
AAA
178.52
03001013A1
976234
COPT, ALFRED
MCWO
510.47
03001022A1
971791
DEHEN, MILDRED
MCWO
430.29
03001029A1
977713
NELSON, IRENE
MCWO
520.18
03001082A1
982289
YUZNA, SYLVESTER S
MCWO
538.97
03001098A1
971307
CORK, JAMES
MCWO
551.49
03001114A1
982299
SULLIVAN, GERTRUDET
MCWO
442.23
03001164A1
971307
CORK, JAMES
MCWO
557.76
03001206A1
976062
JENSEN, DEAN S
MCWO
532.70
03001207A1
982290
MGENI, RAHKMON N
MCWO
498.27
03001208A1
970458
SPREEMAN, BEVERLY
MCWO
538.97
03001213A1
982291
HOOVER, ETHEL H
MCWO
578.97
03001246A1
982301
EHRLER, CLARICE C
MCWO
545.23
03001252A1
980018
KELLER, ROBERT W
MCWO
460.42
03001266A1
982302
SCHETTNER, ETHEL M
MCWO
307.02
03001293A1
973676
SORENSON, TINA
MCWO
447.90
03001314A1
982323
HAMER, CARROLL
MCWO
532.70
03001318A1
982061
BROOKS, PAULETTE I
MCWO
460.42
03001319A1
982305
RHEIN, ROBERT R
MCWO
343.12
03001333A1
982306
THALHUBER, GERRY E
MCWO
532.70
03001349A1
982309
WETTELAND, THERMAN
MCWO
564.01
03001412A1
982321
SANFT, ELLYN R
MCWO
304.68
03001421A1
971980
APPLEMAN, GLADYS
MCWO
447.90
03001439A1
982313
FOURTE, NIA
MAWO
474.95
03001441A1
982314
OBERG, MARIE E
MCWO
515.31
03001463A1
982315
GARRICK, CHRISTOPHER J
MNRR
932.60
03001464A1
982316
HILL, JONATHAN
BKWO
949.10
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03001496A1
982324
ENGELBRECHT, ROBIN G
MCWO
607.85
03001585A1
982317
BUCKINGHAM, CHARLES M
MCWO
526.45
03001630Al
974486
LUEBESMIER, LORETTA
MCWO
287.23
03001641A1
982320
LANG, LAWRENCE F
MCWO
305.46
03001664A1
982332
WADE, TREASA E
MAWO
474.95
03001688A1
979185
LANG, ELOUISE V
MCWO
223.33
03001715A1
973565
CAMPBELL, JACKIE
MAWO
445.80
03001718A1
982333
PETERS, CONSTANCE E
MCWO
532.70
03001727A1
982334
MILLER, MINNIE L
MCWO
560.18
03001728A1
982335
MADIA, JOAN M
MCWO
520.18
03001739A1
981953
SEGLER, BARBARA S
MCWO
570.28
03001754A1
982336
GOOSSEN, JOHN
MCWO
551.49
03001785A1
982339
SMITH, RICHARD
WCWO
96.94
03001790Al
982341
GJERDAHL, HAZEL M
MCWO
447.90
03001791A1
982342
EINBERGER, LOUISE M
MCWO
551.49
03001808A1
971785
RYLANDER, ANITA
MCWO
538.97
03001835A1
978662
PETERSON, GLADYS M
MCWO
437.24
03001855A1
981846
POKORNY, BEVERLY
MCWO
557.76
03001870Al
982347
MAHLKE, MARILYN
MCWO
526.45
03001875A1
981693
BROWN, JANE
MAWO
504.10
03001886A1
982348
BAILEY, ISABEL M
MCWO
484.73
03001898A1
982349
HOLMES, CHAVEL F
MNAA
719.30
030019llAl
982351
SCHENDEL, MARY E
MCWO
616.54
03001971A1
971506
LONGCOR, DUANE
MCWO
532.70
03002004A1
973772
PETERSON, BEVERLY
MNAA
960.40
03002005A1
976566
BERGGREN, EDITH
MCWO
526.45
03002012A1
982362
MORCK, DARWIN E
MCWO
305.46
0300206l Al
982364
ANDERSON, ELOISE
MCWO
564.01
03002074A1
982388
DOLNEY, MARYANN
MCWO
454.05
03002090Al
982367
REGINEK, FRANK
MCWO
343.12
03002115A1
982368
CHEA, SOMANAG M
MAWO
538.27
03002125A1
977830
JOHNSON, WINNIFRED L
MCWO
520.18
03002127A1
980213
MASSON, WILLIAM H
MCWO
500.78
03002157A1
982370
STEUERNAGEL, ARVILLA
MCWO
447.90
03002227A1
977168
PETERSON, CHARLES
MCWO
303.12
03002231A1
982371
BYRNE, PATRICK
MAWO
503.29
03002244A1
982374
SIMS, CORNELL
CMS
921.30
03002290Al
982395
BACHSTEIN, DOROTHY M
MCWO
428.21
03002292A1
973825
LARSEN, MABLE
MCWO
551.49
03002309A1
982377
SCHLATTMAN, ELMER L
MCWO
294.45
03002321A1
982378
STARTS, JENNIFER M
MAWO
486.61
03002330Al
981230
RANSOM, BEVERLY A
MAWO
445.74
03002338A1
977468
PATTERSON, WARREN
MCWO
557.76
03002401A1
977636
WAKEFIELD, EILEEN
MCWO
429.11
03002423A1
982382
HAFFELY, JAMIE M
MAWO
486.13
03002450Al
981848
HOLMAN, MARGARET
MCWO
545.23
03002485A1
982401
MACKENZIE, MAUREEN
MCWO
441.63
03002491A1
982387
SEIVERT, COLETTE
MCWO
576.54
03002506A1
982402
LARSON, ANNE G
MCWO
526.45
03002574A1
982404
MANUEL, EUGENE
MAWO
474.59
03002577A1
970997
LEKO, JUNE
MCWO
582.80
03002582A1
970131
MOGA, RUSSELL
MCWO
520.18
03002606A1
982420
BUETOW, LESLIE G
MCWO
538.97
03002609A1
982405
EDWARDS, PAUL K
MCWO
545.23
03002623A1
970907
SEIBERLICH, DONALD
MCWO
538.97
03002625A1
980267
WICK,JOHN
MCWO
551.49
03002629A1
982407
KOLSTAD, ROALD E
MCWO
572.70
03002630Al
982408
CLAYPOOL JR, JAMES P
MCWO
465.38
03002631A1
974339
EGGERT, MARJORIE
MCWO
308.58
03002660Al
982409
DUELL, CLIFFORD F
MCWO
545.23
03002677A1
983978
LARSEN, CLARA
MCWO
520.18
03002685A1
982413
MCCORD, PATRICIAA
MCWO
511.84
03002695A1
982414
AMOS, ROSE M
MAWO
520.78
03002699A1
982415
HAM, MARJORIE L
MCWO
564.01
03002704A1
982416
XIONG, PAI N
MAWO
245.78
03002707A1
982070
DAHLIN, ALICE L
MCWO
526.45
03002712A1
982422
FORSYTH, SCOTT K
WCWO
101.44
03002721A1
982423
FOWLER, NORAJ
MCWO
435.38
03002778A1
982424
GRABER, RENEE C
MCWO
502.94
03002797A1
982419
HARTMANN, KEELYANN
MAWO
457.46
03002810Al
977679
WOLD, VIRGINIA
MCWO
525.01
03002846A1
982431
GAYNOR, THOMAS J
MCWO
526.45
03002861A1
982197
BOWLES, VERAA
MAWO
486.61
03002867A1
982434
NIFKE, MARGARETE
MCWO
538.97
03002876A1
982435
SINGER, JOAN
MCWO
526.45
03002880Al
982436
MARIE, DARCY
MNAA
204.60
03002900Al
977889
PAPENFUSS, ESTHER
MCWO
551.49
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03002915A1
982440
RECK, DIANE M
MAWO
531.00
03002939A1
970066
LUSTER, GENEVA
MCWO
429.11
03002940Al
978596
RITT, PATRICIA R
MCWO
460.42
03002948A1
982445
MOE, LOWELLA
MCWO
307.02
03002953A1
982446
PIERCE, GALYTEA M
MAWO
479.97
03002991A1
982448
MADISON, DISHON L
MAWO
457.28
03002993A1
982409
DUELL, CLIFFORD F
MCWO
545.23
030030llAl
982434
NIFKE, MARGARETE
MCWO
582.80
03003072A1
972922
EMBERTSON, NANCY M
MCWO
444.08
03003086A1
971957
WORT, DONNA M
MCWO
441.63
03003095A1
978920
LEHMAN, THOMAS
MCWO
545.23
03003112A1
982461
SIEVERT, SHANNON K
MCWO
560.18
03003145A1
982464
BEEBE, DOLORES H
MCWO
526.45
03003162A1
982321
SANFT, ELLYN R
MCWO
304.68
03003198A1
974487
DIPERT, ELEONORE
MCWO
564.01
030032llAl
970801
TSCHIDA, MARIE A
MAWO
468.82
03003212A1
982468
CRYSTAL, LOIS C
MCWO
551.49
03003244A1
982470
LANNERS, SISTER MARGARET
MAWO
570.28
03003246A1
980136
BAKER, EMILY
DECE
506.00
03003258A1
982472
PRIMOLI, DANIEL P
MCWO
520.18
03003267A1
982473
DREGER, LEONAI
MCWO
303.12
03003304A1
982487
JONES, MICAH
MNRR
142.04
03003312A1
982477
LATIKER, ALBERTA
MAWO
503.05
03003338A1
982500
SAKRY, JAMES
MCWO
551.49
03003352A1
982478
JOHNSON, PAUL E
CMS
937.80
03003369A1
982476
SUNDSTROM, CARREN A
MCWO
551.49
03003407A1
982479
LODAHL, JEANETTE M
MCWO
303.12
03003415A1
976009
HARTWIG, ROBERT
MCWO
576.54
03003417A1
982480
DAILEY, FRANCES L
MCWO
520.18
03003419A1
982481
MORIARITY, RICHARD E
MCWO
526.45
03003420Al
981597
WATSON, AUDREY C
MCWO
441.63
03003431A1
982501
WHEELER, DOUG L
WCWO
101.45
03003433A1
982502
LARSON, ELLEN C
MCWO
438.77
03003434A1
982483
KASPER, MARIE E
MCWO
538.97
03003435A1
974070
BLANSKI, VERNON
MCWO
429.11
03003437A1
978520
LYONS, CAROLYN
MAWO
463.05
03003470Al
973825
LARSEN, MABLE
MCWO
564.01
03003472A1
971008
ZEIMET, BERNARD
MAWO
228.05
03003474A1
982488
CAPAUL, VICTORIA
MCWO
304.68
03003475A1
971844
HENRY, PATRICK
MCWO
573.47
03003477A1
981951
NEUMAN, LORRAINE
MCWO
557.76
03003495A1
982491
GILMORE, LAVONNE D
MCWO
560.18
03003588A1
982503
ZELLMAN, VERNA L
MCWO
551.49
03003590Al
982504
WICKER, WILLIAM J
MCWO
532.70
03003592A1
982505
THELIN, RICHARD
MCWO
538.97
03003598A1
982507
FULLERTON, STEVEN J
MCWO
545.23
03003599A1
972622
LANGE, THELMA
MCWO
551.49
03003604A1
982508
KASMIRSKI, JULIE A
MAWO
256.90
03003638A1
982316
HILL, JONATHAN
MAWO
491.90
03003648A1
970183
VOLKERT, JOHN
MCWO
564.01
03003705A1
982523
JOHNSON, ALICE
MCWO
520.18
03003726A1
982512
HOGAN, FRANCIS
MCWO
526.45
03003768A1
982522
JONES, MALCOLM T
MNRR
989.10
03003804A1
982515
BLANCHARD, ANN V
MCWO
551.49
03003806A1
982516
GRAHAM, GORDON G
MCWO
538.97
03003825A1
982517
KADLEC, LAVINA L
MCWO
520.18
03003840Al
976160
MCCURDY, MARLENE
MCWO
310.92
03003854A1
982524
CLASEN, STANLEY R
MCWO
504.25
03003906A1
982527
BURDASH, BETTY M
MCWO
576.54
03003941A1
982531
STOCK, MARION J
MCWO
572.70
03003944A1
980136
BAKER, EMILY
DECE
545.16
03003946A1
970539
BOOG, LEO
MCWO
578.97
03003959A1
985951
HOIUM, CLARENCE
MCWO
526.45
03003962A1
982532
LUCAS, ET
MCWO
520.18
03003970Al
980136
BAKER, EMILY
DECE
550.01
03004030Al
972818
NAVIS, ROBERT
MCWO
564.01
03004036A1
982011
MALCOLM, ETHYLE D
MCWO
303.12
0300404l Al
977468
PATTERSON, WARREN
MCWO
551.49
03004073A1
982542
GODLEWSKI, KATIE M
MAWO
233.82
03004094A1
982544
JONES, ARTHUR
MNRR
943.90
03004095A1
982545
JOHNSON, PHYLLIS J
MCWO
545.23
03004105A1
982546
SABO, CAROL J
MCWO
579.54
03004109A1
982547
RUCHIE, HENRY
MNAA
458.75
03004131A1
982552
LUMBER JR, SCOTT L
MAWO
240.74
03004158A1
982554
EHRLER, EILEEN E
MCWO
454.16
03004175A1
982562
PETERSON, ROBERT A
MCWO
532.70
03004183A1
982557
ENGLIN, WAYNE P
MCWO
597.76
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03004190Al
970212
PIZZUTI, DOROTHY
MCWO
307.02
03004206A1
982473
DREGER, LEONAI
MCWO
304.68
03004220Al
982559
CUCCHIARELLA, NICKOLAS P
MCWO
343.12
03004244A1
982565
CHAPMAN, CHARITY A
MAWO
474.59
03004261A1
982569
ASHLEY, FLOY L
MCWO
551.49
03004267A1
980817
FRENNING, HAROLD C
MCWO
538.97
03004274A1
982570
MORENO, RUDOLPH
MCWO
604.01
03004293A1
982578
DAUGS, JOHN
MCWO
447.90
03004308A1
972615
FERN, MARY JEAN
MAWO
538.97
03004312A1
982572
PATRAW, SHARON L
MAWO
474.59
03004321A1
982574
HER, CHRIST
AAA
955.20
03004327A1
982575
OLSON, KENDRAL
MAWO
463.05
03004347A1
975322
GARRICK, CHERYL
MAWO
463.05
03004371A1
982423
FOWLER, NORAJ
MCWO
441.63
03004381A1
982579
JENSEN, GILBERT J
MCWO
538.97
03004391A1
982608
NELSON, LUCILLE
MCWO
460.42
03004417A1
981159
MUSSEHL, PATRICK A
MCWO
538.97
03004449A1
972871
GRIFFIN, EVELYN H
MCWO
532.70
03004482A1
982581
WILLIS, CORY P
MNAA
721.50
03004485A1
982582
HOPKINS, RONALD A
MNRR
881.30
03004491A1
982583
SCHLATTMAN, GERADYNE L
MCWO
294.45
03004492A1
982584
TRESSA, WADE E
MAWO
474.59
03004496A1
982585
TSCHIDA, HEATHER R
MNAA
744.10
03004506A1
982586
MEYSEMBOURG, ELIZABETH C
MCWO
429.11
03004584A1
982590
KESTI, KAY A
MCWO
564.01
03004603A1
982591
YANG, MEE
MAWO
503.05
03004621A1
980938
KOROLCHUK, AGNES D
MCWO
304.68
03004637A1
982593
CHERRY, LEONA F
MCWO
545.23
03004643A1
982594
GRESBACK, GEORGE T
MCWO
447.90
03004650Al
982595
TORNING, BONETA
MCWO
514.47
03004654A1
982596
DEGNAN, MARDELLE G
MCWO
560.18
03004656A1
980018
KELLER, ROBERT W
MCWO
564.01
03004692A1
982502
LARSON, ELLEN C
MCWO
525.01
03004693A1
982599
MROZINSKI, HARRIET J
MCWO
585.23
03004714A1
982609
SOEHL, RONALD
MCWO
616.54
03004750Al
977129
MORNEAU, JOHN
MCWO
532.70
03004758A1
982610
DANG, VYT
MAWO
445.74
03004768A1
982611
FORSEEN, ROBERT J
VAWO
40.00
03004828A1
982615
THOMSEN, ANNA
MCWO
68.90
03004835A1
982616
OLSON, JAMES
MCWO
560.18
03004844A1
982251
BUTLER, ELEANOR
MCWO
480.36
03004850Al
982617
VANHOUSEN, CORINNE A
MCWO
526.45
03004856A1
982618
LAURICH, MAGELLAN E
AAA
966.50
03004891A1
982620
ROESKE- CARLSON, ANDREW V
MAWO
497.67
03004900Al
981550
SUITER, DOROTHY M
MCWO
526.45
03004903A1
982623
MCGRATH, ROSEMARY C
MCWO
307.02
03004922A1
974917
OMEARA, HELEN
MCWO
564.01
03004924A1
982625
PETERSON, AMY M
MCWO
503.05
03004926A1
982626
PERTZ, BERNADETTE M
MCWO
526.45
03004937A1
981848
HOLMAN, MARGARET
MCWO
545.23
03004946A1
982627
POLLY, CARRIE L
CMS
915.20
03004976A1
974832
BROWN, SHELDON
MCWO
564.01
03005042A1
982632
BURKE, RUTH J
MCWO
564.01
03005047A1
982633
SMITH, DARRELL M
MCWO
560.18
03005053A1
982634
MCCONAUGHEY, KENT R
OTHR
189.82
03005092A1
982586
MEYSEMBOURG, ELIZABETH C
MCWO
520.18
03005097A1
982656
JABRAH, FAISAL A
AAA
926.50
03005107A1
975371
SCHWARTZ, PHYLLIS
MCWO
545.23
03005109A1
976527
LYON, HAROLD O
MCWO
532.70
03005129A1
982637
BLACK III, JESSE W
MCWO
532.70
03005146A1
982640
PARKS, CRYSTAL
MAWO
474.59
03005153A1
971938
ELFSTRUM, LORI
MAWO
463.05
03005174A1
979255
GRANGER, BETTY M
MCWO
307.02
03005175A1
982642
KIZER, LEROY L
MCWO
560.18
03005207A1
977335
SWARTZ, RUTH
MCWO
447.90
03005276A1
982644
THOMASON, CLARK R
MCWO
591.49
03005288A1
982619
AHSAM, LEILANI
MAWO
240.74
03005310Al
982320
LANG, LAWRENCE F
MCWO
305.46
03005315A1
982654
IGAL, JAMA H
MAWO
474.59
03005336A1
976981
HOFMEISTER, BERNICE
MCWO
304.68
03005353A1
982671
CHRISTENSEN, TODD A
MNRR
732.80
03005378A1
976538
MILLER, KATHLEEN P
MCWO
570.28
03005402A1
982674
KURSCHNER, JORDAN L
MAWO
486.13
03005496A1
973807
SCHULTZ, ALICE
MCWO
538.97
03005530Al
982665
FONSECA, FRANCESCA
MAWO
480.36
03005532A1
982667
BARNES, HENRY L
MAWO
520.36
03005571A1
982678
KENNEY. WILLIAM J
MCWO
435.38
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03005652A1
982689
SKORCZEWSKI, MARIE
MCWO
520.18
03005659A1
973772
PETERSON, BEVERLY
MNAA
937.80
03005680Al
976840
BLANCHETTE, LORRAINE
MCWO
520.18
03005690Al
982690
VAN NORMAN, HELEN M
MCWO
538.97
03005696A1
982691
WILLIAMS, TIMOTHY G
MNRR
521.30
03005708A1
982615
THOMSEN, ANNA
MCWO
304.68
03005757A1
976789
KLEIN, DONALD
MCWO
520.18
03005769A1
982694
STUBBS, JAMES
MCWO
604.01
03005779A1
982679
CARLSON, LILLIAN A
MCWO
551.49
03005799A1
974656
LINDAHL, WAYNE
MCWO
532.70
03005819A1
982682
WEISENBURGER, MARION
MCWO
564.01
03005828A1
971655
JOBE, EVELYN
MCWO
567.63
03005868A1
976818
HOCHBAN, GRAYCE
MCWO
526.45
03005869A1
982683
WHALEY, MARJORIE L
MCWO
551.49
03005871A1
982697
FOSTER, CHAD E
MAWO
486.13
03005881A1
982699
COX, JEROME B
MAWO
486.13
03005938A1
982703
BOECK, DOROTHY M
MCWO
545.23
03005952A1
982705
YANG, KIA
MCWO
485.74
03005974A1
982706
ANDERSON, WILLIS B
MCWO
303.12
03005980Al
974788
VADNAIS, ERNA
MCWO
538.38
03006014A1
982713
ZIMMERMAN, PETER L
WCWO
163.92
03006054A1
981178
SMITH, DOROTHY D
MCWO
564.01
03006060Al
982719
FROMMER, FRANCES E
MCWO
551.49
03006072A1
982720
CHUTE, CLAUDIA L
MNRR
1,047.60
03006113A1
977830
JOHNSON, WINNIFRED L
MCWO
520.17
03006118A1
982362
MORCK, DARWIN E
MCWO
402.92
03006172A1
982721
WELLE, ANNA M
MCWO
551.49
03006177A1
973680
JUNGBAUER, EDWARD P
MCWO
406.69
03006228A1
982725
FREEMAN, STORMIE D
MCWO
551.49
03006257A1
982405
EDWARDS, PAUL K
MCWO
538.97
03006284A1
981304
LOCKHART, ALLEN
MAWO
518.17
03006285A1
981282
FORSTNER, JERALDINE L
MCWO
538.97
03006299A1
982730
SEIBERLICH, DOROTHY E
MCWO
538.97
03006319A1
977737
ASHTON, GEORGE
MCWO
538.97
03006323A1
982733
ALLEN, DOROTHY L
MCWO
447.92
03006336A1
982735
SIMON, HANNAH S
MAWO
474.59
03006342A1
982736
GRANT, SHENA C
MAWO
480.36
03006348A1
982737
KAM MUELLER, MARY A
MCWO
451.00
03006385A1
972550
HUGHES, BETTE
MCWO
551.49
03006387A1
982739
BROWN,YOLANDA
MAWO
263.82
03006392A1
982735
SIMON, HANNAH S
MAWO
474.59
03006502A1
974832
BROWN, SHELDON
MCWO
520.18
03006521A1
982746
ALVAREZ, DANIEL B
MAWO
468.82
03006527A1
976098
THOMPSON, WALDRON
MCWO
501.23
03006530Al
970670
JOHNSON, WENDY
MCWO
570.28
03006532A1
982747
MOEHRLE, DAVID R
MAWO
240.74
03006561A1
982749
SINDT, PATRICIA
MCWO
564.01
03006575A1
982590
KESTI, KAY A
MCWO
557.76
03006588A1
982197
BOWLES, VERAA
MAWO
251.13
03006590Al
982750
CARLSON, HARRY
MCWO
303.90
03006599A1
982751
MCGINLEY, JEANETTE M
MCWO
350.14
03006609A1
982752
HAFNER, VERNAA
MCWO
441.63
03006644A1
981134
BROWN, BETTY
MNRR
949.10
03006676A1
982757
MCALLISTER, HARRIET G
MCWO
532.70
03006697A1
982758
LEE, ZA M
MAWO
508.82
03006721A1
982760
CHRISTENSON, WALLACE E
MCWO
585.23
03006736A1
982761
SCHALLY, RICHARD D
MCWO
545.23
03006754A1
982763
O'CONNELL, DOLORES M
MCWO
307.02
03006756A1
982764
NELSON, SUSAN J
MCWO
585.23
03006763A1
976097
ORR, LUELLA
MCWO
110.23
03006802A1
981550
SUITER, DOROTHY M
MCWO
532.70
03006821A1
982768
KELLY, PATRICK R
MCWO
597.76
03006873A1
975478
GRAPE, FLORENCE M
MCWO
526.45
03006896A1
982197
BOWLES, VERAA
MAWO
558.56
03006928A1
982770
JACOBSON, RUTH L
MCWO
520.18
03006956A1
982104
FONTAINE, LLOYD A
MCWO
551.49
03006991A1
978124
GILTNER, AMY
MNRR
949.10
03007004A1
982413
MCCORD, PATRICIAA
MCWO
506.54
03007017A1
982777
ABRAHAM, FELEG G
MNAA
955.20
03007044A1
973101
WILLIAMS, JUNE
MCWO
551.49
0300708l Al
982802
HILLENBOARD, LORA A
TSI
943.90
03007131A1
982804
YUZNA, FLORENCE A
MCWO
532.70
03007179A1
981652
THOMAS, SCOTT J
OTHR
215.20
03007207A1
982841
CAHANES, LUCILLE M
MCWO
566.45
03007217A1
974076
HAYEK, MONICA V
MCWO
520.18
03007250Al
982784
HENTHORNE, ELAINE A
MCWO
564.01
03007269A1
982785
SCHOTL, APOLLONIA G
MCWO
441.63
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03007306A1
974917
OMEARA, HELEN
MCWO
557.76
03007313A1
973183
SETTERHOLM, JOHN
MCWO
454.16
03007316A1
977736
WIGGINS, THOMAS
MCWO
532.70
03007318A1
974056
ROWE, WILLARD
MCWO
307.80
03007391A1
977410
MAYER, WILLIAM
MCWO
564.01
03007423A1
981954
TURNER, MICHAEL J
MNAA
649.10
03007456A1
970032
SWEENEY, JACQUELINE
MAWO
222.28
03007458A1
982807
MOORE, EDWARD R
MCWO
224.11
03007482A1
982809
THOMAS, BILLY R
MNAA
903.90
03007535A1
977814
GARCIA, TERESA L
MNRR
195.56
03007594A1
982802
HILLENBOARD, LORA A
TSI
966.50
03007598A1
982859
MONSON, OLIVIA R
MCWO
306.24
03007603A1
982812
BALLARD, HARRY M
MCWO
526.45
03007649A1
982813
HOSTRAWSER, HELEN B
MCWO
545.23
03007656A1
982814
MULCAHY, KATHLEEN G
MAWO
480.36
0300767OAl
982816
HELMINICK, DONALD J
MCWO
551.49
03007681A1
977293
PRITZEL, JEROME
MAWO
486.13
03007692A1
982818
KROIS, ELIZABETH A
MCWO
592.68
03007709A1
982819
GRIFFITH, ELLIS D
VAWO
256.25
03007768A1
972292
ANGLIN, JAMES
MCWO
551.49
03007794A1
982445
MOE, LOWELLA
MCWO
307.02
03007797A1
982822
YANG, QUA
MAWO
286.90
03007803A1
982476
SUNDSTROM, CARREN A
MCWO
454.16
03007825A1
971338
SASS, CALVIN
MCWO
400.58
03007856A1
976985
LARSON, DOROTHY
MCWO
585.23
03007861A1
976478
LEMENAGER, ASTRID
MCWO
520.18
0300787OAl
982832
HECHT, BEATRICE S
MCWO
570.28
03007875A1
970801
TSCHIDA, MARIE A
MAWO
463.05
0300788OAl
982857
GUANZINI, MARY E
MAWO
592.68
03007883A1
982197
BOWLES, VERAA
MAWO
474.59
03007885A1
982833
SOEBBING, JACQUELINE M
MCWO
570.28
03007891A1
982160
HAM LIN, ALICE M
MCWO
429.11
03007893A1
976376
BUNDE, BETTY
MCWO
307.02
03007899A1
982834
FENLON, LORRAINE A
MCWO
551.49
0300790OAl
982818
KROIS, ELIZABETH A
MCWO
557.76
03007965A1
982844
LEAHY, JAMES
MCWO
435.38
03008019A1
982845
SCHMIDT, ANTHONY L
MNRR
943.90
0300803OAl
971612
ANDERSON, MARIE
MCWO
309.36
03008055A1
982848
MAHMOOD, MARCELLA M
MAWO
532.70
03008058A1
982644
THOMASON, CLARK R
MCWO
585.23
03008059A1
982849
SMITH, HEATHER
MAWO
468.82
03008062A1
982861
FROMM, ERIK G
AAA
966.50
03008065A1
982851
BEACOM, JEAN
MCWO
557.76
03008069A1
982852
GUERIN, DORIS M
MCWO
549.00
03008092A1
982853
NAGLE, MARGARET M
MAWO
233.82
03008095A1
982854
CLABOTS, CLAIRE M
MCWO
586.42
0300810OAl
976826
FORGA, DONALD
MCWO
580.15
03008106A1
982802
HILLENBOARD, LORA A
TSI
710.20
03008109A1
982844
LEAHY, JAMES
MCWO
526.45
03008196A1
978067
ROSEN, ISADORE
MCWO
532.70
03008226A1
972058
STAUFF, MARCIA
MCWO
532.70
03008232A1
982705
YANG, KIA
MAWO
485.74
03008241A1
982916
OLLIG, BETTY
MCWO
343.12
03008242A1
982870
ARNOLD, CAROLEJ
MCWO
520.18
03008283A1
982862
NDOYE, NKEIKO E
MAWO
474.59
03008334A1
982864
LEALI, RAMAL D
COWO
937.80
03008336A1
973374
BRAN DT, JEANNE
MCWO
429.11
03008341A1
981856
COURNOYER, MILFORD A
MCWO
532.70
03008372A1
978216
WILLIAMS, CONNIE
MCWO
576.54
03008375A1
971316
KELLER, MERCEDES
MCWO
429.11
03008409A1
982872
THAO,ZANG
MNRR
161.80
03008443A1
982868
BERGGREN, DONALD D
MCWO
526.45
03008449A1
982869
CYGAN, MICHAEL
MAWO
508.82
03008458A1
982874
YOCH, JEFFREY
WCWO
102.03
0300853OAl
982593
CHERRY, LEONA F
MCWO
460.42
03008584A1
982888
KOSMATHA, RIKA
MAWO
474.59
03008597A1
982878
ELLINGTON, GREGORY J
NOTR
225.00
03008599A1
982879
BASTYR, WILLIAM E
MCWO
441.63
03008612A1
982880
TRUSINSKY, LYDIA
MCWO
617.63
0300862OAl
976865
CALDIE, VIRGINIA
MCWO
570.28
03008622A1
981612
NEIL, JANE A
MCWO
520.18
03008643A1
982868
BERGGREN, DONALD D
MCWO
526.45
03008652A1
982882
SLATER, ELIZABETH T
MCWO
580.15
03008679A1
982884
PENDER- JAITEL, ROCHELLE D
MNAA
564.40
0300868OAl
982885
FORSBLAD, HELEN M
MCWO
303.12
03008689A1
982886
BREWER, MELISSA K
AAA
937.80
0300876OAl
982890
KIDMAN, LEROY
MCWO
573.90
10
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03008777A1
980155
JOHNSON, EVERT A
MCWO
460.42
03008796A1
982893
WINTERS, DEBBIE
TSI
949.10
03008814A1
982885
FORSBLAD, HELEN M
MCWO
220.21
03008830Al
981229
MCCLUSKEY, HELEN S
MCWO
520.18
03008836A1
982895
HARRINGTON, EARL R
MCWO
343.12
03008864A1
982897
NELSON, ROBERT E
MNAA
225.00
03008892A1
982899
FORCIER, BETTY
MCWO
617.73
03008906A1
980982
KUSZ, LLOYD F
MCWO
310.14
03008920Al
980810
JENSEN, ANDREW
MNRR
960.40
03008941A1
982902
ANDERSEN, ELAINE M
MCWO
570.28
03008968A1
982907
PERSON, NEIL V
MNAA
390.29
03008985A1
982905
JOHNSON, JUDITH A
MCWO
343.90
03009056A1
982911
BREHEIM, OLIVE K
MCWO
490.42
03009137A1
982914
THOMAS, JENNIFER N
AAA
1,011.70
03009161A1
982921
BACS,ALEXANDER
MCWO
305.46
03009165A1
982593
CHERRY, LEONA F
MCWO
570.28
03009175A1
971888
ERICKSON, HOWARD L
MCWO
560.18
03009182A1
982974
BENTZ, LEONE
MCWO
441.63
03009203A1
982920
MOORE, RICHARD
MCWO
538.97
03009227A1
982922
PAY, CHHENGLIM
MNRR
626.50
03009239A1
982924
NIENAS, MARIE D
MCWO
538.97
03009263A1
982941
FISCHER, KAREN M
MAWO
529.71
03009274A1
982975
CARTER, JULIE
AAA
100.00
03009298A1
982925
SMITH, LORRAINE F
MCWO
538.30
03009306A1
982926
RONGITSCH, DONALD F
MCWO
592.68
03009314A1
982928
O'NEAL, MYRTIS
MAWO
491.90
03009320Al
971719
ZIEBOL, EDWARD
MCWO
526.45
03009378A1
982931
BUERSKEN, LELAND M
MAWO
40.39
03009379A1
982932
WALBRIDGE, DARLENE A
MCWO
551.49
03009383A1
980889
BROWNING, DOROTHY H
MCWO
532.70
03009424A1
982995
WHITE, BETHANY L
MAWO
197.82
03009436A1
982936
LOEFFLER, NATHAN M
MAWO
486.13
03009464A1
975204
MCNEAL, DALE
DECE
628.76
03009493A1
982944
JOHNSON, MARTINIQUE R
MAWO
292.67
03009503A1
982947
BENDER, ALICE M
MCWO
429.11
03009526A1
982110
STIPE, ANNAMARIA
MCWO
491.73
03009558A1
982948
LUNDSTROM, THERESA E
MCWO
304.68
03009570Al
982949
MILLER, ALICE
MCWO
307.80
03009589A1
982952
FOLEY, RYAN C
MAWO
480.36
03009599A1
981550
SUITER, DOROTHY M
MCWO
532.70
03009636A1
982950
GUNN, TERRELLD
MAWO
526.13
03009652A1
971752
COTRONEO, ETHELYN
MCWO
538.97
03009692A1
973465
GAMBONI, ROSALIE S
MCWO
220.21
03009693A1
983093
SENJEM, LOUIS
MCWO
545.23
03009703A1
982954
CHRISTENSEN, BRYAN D
WCWO
138.19
03009719A1
982197
BOWLES, VERAA
MAWO
457.28
03009720Al
982957
WEDES, CARYL H
MCWO
532.70
03009736A1
982959
JUST, SHIRLEY
MNRR
1,092.80
03009748A1
977439
KLOSSNER, SIGNE
MCWO
304.68
03009776A1
982962
MARTINEZ, BONNIE E
MCWO
451.51
03009885A1
982965
HOVLAND, HELIEN M
MCWO
538.38
03009896A1
980982
KUSZ, LLOYD F
MCWO
307.02
03009898A1
982968
DURAND, DOROTHY M
MCWO
307.80
03009984A1
980631
BUSCH, FREDERICK W
MCWO
551.49
03010017A1
982984
GRYSKIEWICZ, MILDRED J
MCWO
532.70
03010026A1
982985
SKOOG, ETHEL M
MCWO
560.18
03010070Al
982986
NOVAK, AGNES B
MCWO
441.63
03010075A1
982989
KAG ER, MARY
MCWO
441.63
03010167A1
983040
LEWIS, LORETTA B
MCWO
532.70
03010188A1
983041
TRZCIANKO, ANN
MAWO
486.13
03010194A1
983002
NELSON, CONNIE M
MAWO
531.90
03010201A1
972236
BURGESS, CHARLOTTE A
MCWO
538.97
03010202A1
982998
CAVANAUGH, TODD R
MAWO
514.59
03010203A1
983013
HUDAK, IRENE R
MCWO
441.63
03010223A1
982997
SCHELTNER, ETHEL
MCWO
307.80
03010250Al
983002
NELSON, CONNIE M
MAWO
514.59
03010280Al
983000
HURD, DEBRA
WCWO
101.44
03010314A1
983001
ZENS, TONYAJ
MNRR
1,000.40
03010350Al
975002
SOMMERS, GLADYS
MCWO
611.46
03010356A1
983004
LEANYEAR, TYDEANTA L
MAWO
457.28
03010367A1
983009
WOOD, ELMER L
MCWO
572.70
03010372A1
983003
ROBINSON, CHARLOTTE L
MCWO
545.23
03010427A1
970997
LEKO, JUNE
MCWO
303.90
03010441A1
983012
PAIPAL, SARAH B
OTHR
0.30
03010459A1
976164
FORREST, EARL
VAWO
243.75
03010470Al
983023
BLAZEK, MARCELLA J
MCWO
532.70
03010473A1
983024
MAHONEY. FRANK
MCWO
573.08
11
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03010530Al
973475
HANSEN, DORIS L
MCWO
567.63
03010538A1
982928
O'NEAL, MYRTIS
MAWO
491.90
03010544A1
983026
STORY, SUZANNE L
MCWO
564.01
03010566A1
983085
PALENKO, EILEEN
MCWO
303.12
03010579A1
983045
GEISEN, JOSEPH N
MCWO
532.70
03010607A1
974708
TACHENY, BERNARD
MCWO
564.01
03010616A1
982480
DAILEY, FRANCES L
MCWO
526.45
03010639A1
983046
SCHREINER, JEAN A
MCWO
572.70
03010645A1
983047
OHAGEN, CATHERINE M
AAA
915.20
03010668A1
983031
DAVIS, CHARLES L
MCWO
343.12
03010673A1
982725
FREEMAN, STORMIE D
MCWO
545.23
03010678A1
983033
WETHERN, KALEY M
MAWO
523.94
03010680Al
982941
FISCHER, KAREN M
MAWO
535.48
03010708A1
983048
KELLY, MARJORIE M
MCWO
538.97
03010709A1
983049
EYLER, MARLYS
MCWO
623.90
030107llAl
983050
GARY, CHRISTINE L
MCWO
560.18
03010781A1
983051
PARDO, TERESAJ
MNRR
10.56
03010838A1
983062
GRIFFIN, ETHEL L
MCWO
222.55
03010839A1
982423
FOWLER, NORAJ
MCWO
573.90
03010845A1
970072
WALKER, DOLORES
MCWO
573.90
03010896A1
983057
MCGUIGGAN, JOYCE M
MCWO
520.18
03010904A1
982154
YANG, MEE
MAWO
509.21
03010906A1
983064
BENSON, BETTY
MCWO
305.46
03010915A1
983065
LAW, HELEN V
MCWO
303.90
03010923A1
983066
KENNEY, CATHERINE C
MCWO
231.51
03010926A1
983067
HACKER, JOSEPH
MCWO
441.63
03010928A1
983068
RICHARDSON, TIMOTHY
MCWO
576.54
03010943A1
983069
KIDDER, CHARLES R
MCWO
545.23
03010945A1
983070
MARKS, MICAH V
MNRR
1,115.40
03010998A1
983072
MAYLONE, RYAN
MNRR
136.04
03011025A1
983074
MOUA, LEE
MAWO
468.82
03011039A1
982476
SUNDSTROM, CARREN A
MCWO
551.49
03011052A1
983076
MARKON, VIOLAS
MCWO
522.46
03011054A1
983077
MOGREN, THOMAS
MCWO
576.54
03011056A1
983078
GUSTAFSON, MARTHA M
MCWO
559.29
03011064A1
975431
HAGERTY, THOMAS L
MCWO
586.42
03011096A1
983080
SKAAR, JACK W
MCWO
560.18
03011127A1
978352
RESEMIUS, JEAN M
MCWO
520.18
03011128A1
983086
ERICKSON, MARTHA H
MCWO
580.15
03011143A1
983087
OFSTAD, AARON E
CMS
903.90
03011150Al
983082
JOHNSON, IMARA D
MAWO
228.05
03011154A1
983088
EILERS, NINA M
MCWO
611.46
03011164A1
983089
TIERNEY, CHRISTOPHER J
MCWO
520.18
03011176A1
983097
YANG, CHONG L
MCWO
572.70
03011178A1
983098
KNIGHT, WESLEY
VAWO
40.00
03011237A1
982725
FREEMAN, STORMIE D
MCWO
551.49
03011247A1
983102
ROSE, MARGARET V
MCWO
429.11
03011251A1
983103
WANGERIN, LUCILE J
MCWO
572.70
03011268A1
983104
OLSENMOORE, GREYSON L
MNRR
105.48
03011316A1
981017
ERICKSON, BARBARA J
MCWO
572.70
03011333A1
978028
VINGERS, GEORGE
MCWO
520.18
03011376A1
976234
COPT, ALFRED
MCWO
517.15
03011393A1
981550
SUITER, DOROTHY M
MCWO
526.45
03011398A1
974273
LONEY, LOUISE
MCWO
545.23
03011435A1
983109
BROWN, DARRIN M
MNRR
977.80
03011454A1
983110
MANI, BRANDON
MAWO
485.74
03011473A1
983113
HOLLANITSCH, GREGORY E
MCWO
532.70
03011482A1
983114
JACOBSEN, MIMMI
MCWO
520.18
03011505A1
977369
KOHLMAN, ESTHER
MCWO
221.77
03011572A1
983116
STENQUIST, AMBER J
MAWO
269.59
03011587A1
983117
LIESKE, MARIA
MAWO
463.05
03011606A1
983118
KOHENE, DOLLY
MAWO
480.36
03011626A1
976757
TESTA, MARY J
MCWO
520.18
03011628A1
983119
STEWART, ALFRED E
MCWO
545.23
03011695A1
983125
ROCHA, RICHARD M
MCWO
604.01
03011713A1
983126
SCHWAB, WILLIAM J
MCWO
673.99
03011731A1
982725
FREEMAN, STORMIE D
MCWO
545.23
03011746A1
982248
JACKSON, ADELINE F
MCWO
591.49
03011815A1
979124
BARDY, PETER
MCWO
479.21
03011817A1
981530
PRICE, VIRGINIA R
MCWO
479.21
03011901A1
979204
FALLON, JAMES L
MCWO
564.01
03011912A1
983133
PEDERSON, CAROLE F
MCWO
572.70
03011913A1
983134
SENJEM, JEANNE
MCWO
551.49
03011914A1
983135
FINKELSON, JUANITA K
MCWO
452.92
03011952A1
983138
NELSEN, HARRY P
MCWO
343.12
03011957A1
983139
TORRES, ABEL
COWO
714.10
03011993A1
976789
KLEIN, DONALD
MCWO
520.18
12
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03012003A1
981596
HAM RE, RONALD D
MCWO
567.63
03012026A1
976625
DALBEC, JILL A
MAWO
526.13
03012071A1
983143
ALLEN, PAUL R
MCWO
538.97
03012072A1
982608
NELSON, LUCILLE
MCWO
479.21
03012076A1
977873
SVENDSEN, RUBY
MCWO
570.28
03012077A1
983144
BE LLAN D, RIC HAR D J
MCWO
532.70
03012080Al
983145
ANDERSON, DONNA
MCWO
519.68
03012082A1
981953
SEGLER, BARBARA S
MCWO
557.76
03012112A1
983146
CLARK, DOROTHY L
MCWO
570.28
03012125A1
972550
HUGHES, BETTE
MCWO
564.01
03012175A1
983148
MEYER, ALICE
MCWO
564.01
03012259A1
983153
ISSE, STAHL Y
MNRR
698.90
03012263A1
983155
BURFORD, CARRIE
MAWO
486.13
03012288A1
982476
SUNDSTROM, CARREN A
MCWO
551.49
03012291A1
983328
SPEARS, WILLIAM
MCWO
526.45
03012351A1
983159
YOUNG, LORRAINE A
MCWO
578.97
03012353A1
972550
HUGHES, BETTE
MCWO
564.01
03012379A1
979048
ELIASSON, EDWARD C
MCWO
580.15
03012420Al
983164
SKWIER, STACY M
MAWO
239.59
03012422A1
972922
EMBERTSON, NANCY M
MCWO
517.08
03012432A1
983165
CROWE, MARGARET M
MCWO
585.23
03012451A1
983166
KERSCHNER, RONALD F
MCWO
305.46
03012479A1
980889
BROWNING, DOROTHY H
MCWO
526.45
03012481A1
970674
LEE, RHODA
MCWO
526.45
03012524A1
983326
JOHNSON, ANGELA R
MAWO
239.59
03012542A1
983170
SUCHAN, MARION G
MCWO
520.18
03012543A1
983331
MUNDI, JASWINDER
MNRR
871.90
03012550Al
980038
ROSEN, MILDRED P
MCWO
592.68
03012566A1
983171
GEIS, ROBERT
MNAA
187.56
03012590Al
983173
JAROSIEWICZ, MICHELLE E
MCWO
551.49
03012631A1
983201
SPREIGL, MARY
MCWO
551.49
03012662A1
978478
SANDSTROM, PATRICIAA
MAWO
480.36
03012669A1
983202
CAPEDER, RACHEL R
WCWO
101.44
03012672A1
978659
SCHWANTES, LORRAINE M
MCWO
435.38
03012691A1
983183
PARHAM, JEREMY
COLL
960.40
03012748A1
983190
CHLAN, JESSICA R
MAWO
556.63
03012752A1
983204
NEURER, TIMOTHY J
MAWO
507.51
03012761A1
983193
LATVALA,YOLANDA
MCWO
526.45
03012776A1
977474
BECKWITH, GEORGE
MCWO
601.59
03012781A1
980889
BROWNING, DOROTHY H
MCWO
526.45
03012791A1
982231
VANLANINGHAM, ELDON E
MCWO
545.23
03012799A1
981846
POKORNY, BEVERLY
MCWO
551.49
03012814A1
975923
ROSS, ROSALYN
MCWO
551.49
03012816A1
983205
KELCHER, ROSE
MCWO
306.24
03012825A1
983207
CROES, FRED
MCWO
541.23
03012843A1
983209
SNIDARICH, ANGELA M
MAWO
485.74
03012862A1
983210
PROCH, TILLIE
MCWO
309.36
03012865A1
983211
ABDI, HALIMO M
MAWO
514.59
03012887A1
977003
HOLMAN, RUTH
MCWO
532.70
03012927A1
983214
BRUZEK, MARY
MCWO
564.01
03012929A1
983215
RUSSELL, GOLDIE B
MCWO
570.28
03012968A1
980889
BROWNING, DOROTHY H
MCWO
435.38
03012974A1
983221
GARCIA, ROBERTO G
MAWO
520.36
03012995A1
983223
HOGLUND, LUCAS
MNAA
643.30
03013020Al
981550
SUITER, DOROTHY M
MCWO
526.45
03013052A1
980859
TRACY, DUWAYNEA
MCWO
564.01
03013135A1
976097
ORR, LUELLA
MCWO
570.28
03013159A1
983234
DOUGLASS, FREDRICK D
AAA
661.49
03013160Al
981344
WOLFE, LAWRENCE R
MCWO
532.70
03013161A1
983219
TANGEN, JOYCE M
MCWO
447.90
03013164A1
983218
BROWN, LUVERNE G
MCWO
435.38
03013191A1
972550
HUGHES, BETTE
MCWO
564.01
03013195A1
983237
BLUE, THERESA
MNRR
955.20
03013208A1
983242
MARTINSON, MATTHEW P
MAWO
239.59
03013209A1
970290
VITEK, EDWARD
MCWO
526.45
03013215A1
983238
AVOLES, ANTHONY W
MCWO
560.18
03013273A1
983245
ENGEN, DONALD R
MCWO
564.01
03013283A1
982815
LAMBERT, BERNICE J
MCWO
460.42
03013294A1
983246
HANSON, SCOTT R
MNRR
949.10
03013295A1
983247
GUTH, ELEANORE A
MCWO
303.12
03013333A1
979019
LARSEN, KENNETH D
MCWO
551.49
03013354A1
977656
STENBACK, GAIL E
MCWO
578.97
03013358A1
983252
CLEVELAND, CHARLES K
MCWO
576.54
03013359A1
983253
LOVE, GERALD F
MCWO
305.46
03013383A1
982476
SUNDSTROM, CARREN A
MCWO
564.01
03013430Al
978301
HEDWALL, VIOLET F
MCWO
617.73
03013467A1
974921
YEKALDO, LILLIAN G
MCWO
300.10
13
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03013507A1
983257
BROWN, HILLARD L
MAWO
468.82
03013520Al
974056
ROWE, WILLARD
MCWO
307.80
03013521A1
983258
KAISER, ETHEL E
MCWO
520.18
03013577A1
973557
GALLAGHER, MICHAEL
MCWO
564.01
03013595A1
983260
REETZ, LORETTA R
MCWO
526.45
03013608A1
983346
HARDY, NAIDA L
MCWO
447.90
03013616A1
981414
OHMAN, GERALDINE A
MCWO
564.01
03013634A1
983263
SCHULTZ, MELVIN D
MCWO
303.12
03013637A1
981976
CLARITY, MICHAEL J
MCWO
564.01
03013668A1
983265
REED, JAMES
OTHR
2.34
03013677A1
981976
CLARITY, MICHAEL J
MCWO
551.49
03013689A1
983271
KLENK, LUCRETIA
MCWO
303.12
03013697A1
983274
SEELEY, ROBERT
MCWO
532.70
03013760Al
983276
FOOTE, ANNA M
MCWO
572.70
03013769A1
983277
HO, MAYRA
MAWO
497.28
03013776A1
982231
VANLANINGHAM, ELDON E
MCWO
564.01
03013817A1
970692
FLATTEN, MARY ANN
MCWO
305.46
03013825A1
978048
PHIPPS, DELORIS E
MCWO
545.23
03013853A1
983281
HOIUM, LORRAINE C
MCWO
573.90
03013864A1
983284
MCSORLEY, ADAM P
MAWO
497.28
03013912A1
983288
GREEN, ROBERT E
MCWO
604.01
03013922A1
983289
KABLAOUI, IMANE
MAWO
531.90
03013964A1
983290
BENSON, GOLDA A
MAWO
262.67
03013984A1
983291
PERLICH, GERALDINE B
MCWO
560.18
03014025A1
983247
GUTH, ELEANORE A
MCWO
303.12
03014043A1
983292
GALVIN, DOROTHY
MCWO
454.16
03014045A1
983293
BERRY, CELESTE A
MCWO
303.12
03014050Al
983294
LOVOLD, SYLVAN H
MCWO
343.12
03014057A1
970034
VAUGHAN, FLORENCE M
MCWO
435.38
03014089A1
981055
GULDEN, JAMECIO
MAWO
463.05
03014117A1
983296
FISCHBACH, ARNOLD R
MCWO
538.38
03014157A1
983298
HUNT, JOHNNY R
MAWO
503.80
03014174A1
983299
BUCKLES, PATRICIA W
MCWO
597.76
03014186A1
983301
WANYAMA, ERIYA
MAWO
586.65
03014200Al
975722
ABRAHAMSEN, ELMA
MCWO
520.18
03014212A1
983303
MITCHELL, GEORGE D
MNRR
425.80
03014243A1
982334
MILLER, MINNIE L
MCWO
526.45
03014244A1
983304
KLINKHAMMER,"IS J
MCWO
597.76
03014245A1
983305
KRUMP, AMBROSEJ
VAWO
40.00
03014270Al
977828
GULDEN, JESSICA
MAWO
463.05
03014323A1
972750
FRANKLIN, ALICE
MCWO
538.97
03014366A1
983311
TAKALA, AMELIAG
MCWO
566.45
03014374A1
983312
STRUCK, VIRGINIA N
MCWO
532.70
03014375A1
983313
SHIN, DAVID L
MCWO
545.23
03014383A1
983314
RONGITSCH, RAYMOND J
MCWO
641.14
03014409A1
983319
BOWERS, MARCELINE M
MCWO
538.97
03014422A1
975963
MOE, ALMIRA
MCWO
520.18
03014424A1
983321
HARDENBROOK, CURTIS C
MCWO
526.45
03014436A1
982725
FREEMAN, STORMIE D
MCWO
545.23
03014457A1
983332
MONETTE, DAVID M
MNRR
943.90
03014466A1
983333
LASCHINGER, HELEN L
MCWO
572.70
03014491A1
983138
NELSEN, HARRY P
MCWO
304.68
03014505A1
983337
RHEIN, CATHERINE E
MCWO
611.46
03014512A1
983363
WICKLANDER, LEONAT
MCWO
220.21
03014523A1
983341
HARRIS, ANGELA L
MAWO
485.74
03014529A1
983342
HENDERSON, JACQUELINE C
MCWO
440.00
03014534A1
983349
BOHLEN, LYDIA N
MCWO
564.01
03014565A1
983352
LEE, KEVIN
MAWO
457.28
03014597A1
980307
GORR, EVELYN E
MCWO
435.38
03014598A1
983354
HOLLINGSWORTH, PATRICIAJ
MCWO
303.12
03014655A1
983282
HANSON, LYLE H
MCWO
538.97
03014666A1
983358
KNAPP, LORRAINE M
MCWO
538.97
03014681A1
980618
ANDERSON, VENESSA A
MAWO
474.59
03014699A1
983360
MCCANN, RUTH
MCWO
585.23
03014707A1
983361
JOHNSON, WILLIAM K
MCWO
538.97
030147llAl
983362
RICHARD, MICHAEL K
MNRR
1,008.90
03014776A1
983370
CHARTRAND, COREY D
MAWO
256.70
03014778A1
971106
ANDREWS, ALICE
MCWO
538.97
03014787A1
983365
KNIERIEMEN, CHERYL R
MCWO
471.63
03014815A1
979019
LARSEN, KENNETH D
MCWO
538.97
03014858A1
970666
ZETAH, RAYMOND
MCWO
567.63
03014877A1
983377
RAMIG, MICHELLE
COLL
960.40
03014924A1
983379
DULL, JENNIFER
MAWO
514.59
03014969A1
981502
ANDERSON, GRACE H
MCWO
616.54
03014976A1
983380
WILLOUGHBY, LYNETTE M
MNRR
608.90
03015031A1
974164
DONLIN, PAUL
MCWO
570.28
03015049A1
983382
RIEF. JAMES E
MCWO
616.54
14
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03015067A1
983384
MARCELLO, NORMA V
MCWO
441.63
03015094A1
978301
HEDWALL, VIOLET F
MCWO
564.01
03015104A1
970691
BRIX, CHARLES
MCWO
564.01
03015121A1
980859
TRACY, DUWAYNEA
MCWO
538.97
03015122A1
983388
TOENJESBYBAS, BEVERLY T
MCWO
595.32
03015173A1
972550
HUGHES, BETTE
MCWO
557.76
03015208A1
983402
BROWN, JOHN
MNAA
485.34
03015210Al
970674
LEE, RHODA
MCWO
557.76
03015220Al
978084
GRUIS, VIVIAN M
MCWO
520.18
03015234A1
983404
TAMASY, ELIZABETH
MAWO
557.76
03015235A1
983405
HANSEN, RUTH E
MCWO
532.70
03015270Al
983408
MCKENNA, ROBERT M
MNRR
668.90
03015275A1
983409
JACKSON, TONY
AAA
714.10
03015281A1
983411
OLDENKAMP, MARK
MNRR
1,000.40
03015282A1
980128
PRUDEN, PAUL
MCWO
532.70
03015286A1
983412
SALTZ, ROSALIE T
OTHR
0.10
03015320Al
983413
STROBEL, BRUCE
MNRR
1,023.00
03015325A1
983352
LEE, KEVIN
MAWO
451.51
03015551A1
982667
BARNES, HENRY L
MCWO
564.01
03015566A1
983424
RICHARDS, BEVERLY M
MCWO
572.70
03015637A1
983430
VANG, FA
MCWO
564.01
03015701A1
971827
LOCKWOOD, VIVIAN
MCWO
537.20
03015778A1
983428
HAMER, SHANTEL M
MAWO
445.74
03015793A1
973557
GALLAGHER, MICHAEL
MCWO
617.73
03015860Al
983449
KNUTSON, RONALD V
COWO
1,149.30
03015874A1
983451
GILSTAD, BRIAN J
MAWO
192.08
03015875A1
978028
VINGERS, GEORGE
MCWO
520.18
03015929A1
983457
DANTZLER, REBECCA
MAWO
480.36
03015960Al
983462
DAVIS, ROBERT L
MCWO
545.23
03015962A1
983459
LARSON, DONALD L
MCWO
567.63
03015985A1
983466
LARSON, JEANNE E
MCWO
538.97
03015987A1
977003
HOLMAN, RUTH
MCWO
532.70
03015991A1
983467
PERRAULT, DONALD K
MCWO
560.18
03016022A1
974406
YANG, JOHN
MCWO
560.18
03016036A1
983470
BURKS, DANENIAS
MAWO
541.25
03016037A1
983471
JOHNSON, LORRAINE M
MCWO
532.70
03016041A1
983472
MUELLER, MAVISC
MCWO
466.69
03016057A1
983207
CROES, FRED
MCWO
517.15
03016074A1
982725
FREEMAN, STORMIE D
MCWO
551.49
03016085A1
983093
SENJEM, LOUIS
MCWO
557.76
03016089A1
983476
TONER, FLORENCE M
MCWO
520.18
03016104A1
983478
MCDONALD, JILL
MCWO
551.49
03016132A1
983480
VARING, KATHERINE M
MCWO
526.45
03016152A1
983481
BERGERSON, LUCILLE J
MCWO
560.18
03016155A1
983483
EDEN, HENRIETTA W
MCWO
520.18
03016174A1
983456
RIEGER, ELIZABETH J
MCWO
560.18
03016221A1
975722
ABRAHAMSEN, ELMA
MCWO
429.11
03016235A1
983486
SCHWARTZ, LAVERN E
MCWO
564.01
03016258A1
982725
FREEMAN, STORMIE D
MCWO
545.23
03016309A1
983606
OHLHAUSER, MAGDELENA
MCWO
538.97
03016340Al
976437
TREAGUE, AGNES
MCWO
520.18
03016367A1
981953
SEGLER, BARBARA S
MCWO
623.99
03016381A1
982272
EHRBRIGHT, MELISSA L
MNAA
937.80
03016385A1
979262
REID, ERICK C
MCWO
460.42
03016415A1
980519
SHEFFIELD, RENEE A
MCWO
605.21
03016435A1
982941
FISCHER, KAREN M
MAWO
514.59
03016439A1
983453
MIRANDA (SALLIS), RICARDO A
MNRR
977.80
03016443A1
983502
BHAKTA, GULABBEN N
MCWO
560.18
03016446A1
976378
BENSON, RICHARD
MCWO
526.45
03016494A1
983527
PUFPAFF, FLORENCE L
MCWO
303.90
03016525A1
983505
TAYLOR, BETTY
MAWO
480.36
03016537A1
983503
LOCKE, KAYLAH M
MNAA
807.10
03016557A1
983507
TERIBA, ADEFUNTO T
MAWO
312.44
03016584A1
983457
DANTZLER, REBECCA
MAWO
474.59
03016587A1
983509
DESLER, MURIEL M
MCWO
526.45
03016602A1
983511
BUTCHER, RYAN C
MNRR
1,023.00
03016606A1
983512
LEE, MAO V
MCWO
308.58
03016612A1
983513
BLOMGREN, ILETTA E
MCWO
298.18
03016617A1
983514
LANTZ, JEFFERYA
AAA
921.30
03016665A1
983507
TERIBA, ADEFUNTO T
MAWO
497.67
03016673A1
972650
HAYNE, JACQUELINE
MCWO
526.45
03016684A1
980334
PORWOLL, BERNICE
MCWO
533.08
03016687A1
983530
CHAMPION, HELEN E
MCWO
532.70
03016745A1
983519
GRONEWALD JR, GARY R
MNAA
778.00
03016747A1
983520
LUNDGREN, AMY
MNAA
604.20
03016755A1
983476
TONER, FLORENCE M
MCWO
557.76
03016793A1
983534
GRAUPNER, ASHLEY M
MAWO
497.67
15
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03016843A1
972486
WEYANDT,THOMAS
MCWO
551.49
03016850Al
983523
KOLBECK, DELMAJ
MCWO
630.15
03016859A1
976160
MCCURDY, MARLENE
MCWO
303.90
03016865A1
970781
BEUTEL, ELSIEJ
MCWO
564.01
03016868A1
983536
WATERS, JAMES
MCWO
560.18
03016876A1
982590
KESTI, KAY A
MCWO
557.76
03016892A1
983404
TAMASY, ELIZABETH
MCWO
545.23
03016917A1
973112
ASCHE, DORIS M
MCWO
623.99
03016930Al
983538
RAKOWSKI, CHARLES
MCWO
526.45
03016935A1
983539
SMITH, MARK
AAA
911.70
03016952A1
983541
LEACH, ROBERT W
MAWO
463.05
03016965A1
983543
MCDONNELL, MAE C
MCWO
455.26
03016993A1
980121
SABIO, KEITH B
MCWO
551.49
03016994A1
983544
SCHOENECKER, HERBERT M
MCWO
610.28
03017025A1
983548
GAETZ, VAELAJ
OTHR
0.08
03017028A1
981314
RENTERIA, AMELIA
MCWO
551.49
03017041A1
977559
KAVANAUGH, LOIS
MCWO
655.21
03017078A1
983553
YANG, ABIGAIL
MCWO
526.13
03017084A1
983557
ANDERSON, LILLIAN J
MCWO
526.45
03017089A1
983558
SCHOENECKER, MARGARET K
MCWO
532.70
03017120Al
983560
ANDERSON, RHEA
MCWO
526.45
03017123A1
983561
LUNDE, GREGORY
MAWO
518.17
03017151A1
982725
FREEMAN, STORMIE D
MCWO
545.23
03017153A1
983562
CARLSON, JOHN M
CRIM
116.26
03017157A1
983563
DAVILLA, AMY D
MNAA
955.20
03017167A1
983564
INDYKIEWICZ, PAUL G
MAWO
497.28
03017168A1
983565
YANG, JOUAF
MCWO
296.31
03017189A1
983566
NGUYER, LORI L
WCWO
148.36
03017216A1
974219
MORRISON, TIMOTHY
MAWO
228.05
03017225A1
983205
KELCHER, ROSE
MCWO
306.24
03017238A1
983568
STICKLER, JOHN
MCWO
306.24
03017276A1
983569
NADEAU, CLIFFORD J
MCWO
520.18
03017310Al
983134
SENJEM, JEANNE
MCWO
551.49
03017390Al
983584
MARSH, PATRICK J
MAWO
480.36
03017398A1
983585
WOLLER, JAMES
MNAA
1,104.10
03017405A1
983586
OLSON, ELAINE B
MCWO
611.46
03017418A1
983587
HANSEN, ETHEL M
MCWO
564.01
03017430Al
983589
SANCHEZ, SERAPH
MCWO
597.76
03017438A1
983590
WILLIAMS, STEVEN P
MNAA
949.10
03017439A1
983591
OURADNIK, THOMAS J
MNAA
960.40
03017450Al
983592
FRANKS, SANDRA D
MAWO
474.59
03017452A1
983601
BAKER, HERBERT
MNRR
751.80
03017495A1
982342
EINBERGER, LOUISE M
MCWO
557.76
030175llAl
983596
LINN, VIRGINIA
MCWO
309.36
03017517A1
982590
KESTI, KAY A
MCWO
551.49
03017620Al
983615
HANNON, FAROUKT
WCWO
96.94
03017627A1
983611
SKYTTE, MARLIN O
MCWO
592.68
03017632A1
977215
WILKE, MARIE
MCWO
526.45
03017663A1
977737
ASHTON, GEORGE
MCWO
538.97
03017664A1
980782
SWANSON, CARL H
MCWO
545.23
03017665A1
983620
RESONG, GERALD R
MCWO
545.23
03017666A1
982231
VANLANINGHAM, ELDON E
MCWO
466.69
03017682A1
978182
PICKETT, ANGELIC
MAWO
474.59
03017719A1
982725
FREEMAN, STORMIE D
MCWO
545.23
03017742A1
983662
FITZGERALD, DEVANTAE M
MAWO
463.05
03017746A1
983664
MICHAUD, CAROL
MCWO
520.18
03017749A1
983665
ORSELLO, ALFRED
MCWO
604.01
03017782A1
983684
HEFTY, EDWARD R
MAWO
309.36
03017794A1
983666
BLATCHER, DOMINIQUE S
MAWO
486.13
03017815A1
978076
VIGNALO, DELORES
MCWO
551.49
03017852A1
983669
POST, HELEN B
MCWO
576.54
03017861A1
983670
SMITH, RICHARD
MCWO
570.28
03017862A1
971313
VALENTY, JEAN
MCWO
551.49
03017866A1
983671
BUCHHOLZ, HERMAN F
MCWO
532.70
03017883A1
983674
HUMPHREY, VIVIAN A
MCWO
532.70
03017940Al
977814
GARCIA, TERESA L
MNRR
79.44
03017952A1
973695
LAPINSKI, JOSEPH C
MCWO
582.80
03018000Al
980817
FRENNING, HAROLD C
MCWO
586.42
03018019A1
983703
HOERCHNER, LILLIAN P
MCWO
459.11
03018021A1
983680
FRANCK, GREG N
MCWO
520.18
03018072A1
983683
BLAZER, MICHAEL P
MAWO
445.74
03018091A1
972977
EKLOF, BERNICE
MCWO
532.70
03018120Al
974063
WOODWARD, GEORGE
MCWO
545.23
03018123A1
981159
MUSSEHL, PATRICK A
MAWO
532.70
03018133A1
983712
TAUER, ELLEN M
MCWO
435.38
03018149A1
983713
VENNEMANN, DAVID F
MCWO
532.70
03018160Al
983714
RODRIGUEZ, MARIAN J
MCWO
545.23
16
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03018161A1
983692
SHERBURNE, BETTE A
MCWO
560.18
03018200Al
983715
SPANN, MICHAEL
MCWO
576.54
03018212A1
983472
MUELLER, MAVISC
MCWO
532.70
03018219A1
981848
HOLMAN, MARGARET
MCWO
538.97
03018227A1
983718
WOODRICH, WARD F
MCWO
560.18
03018266A1
983721
ANDERSON, RICHARD R
MCWO
304.68
03018272A1
974219
MORRISON, TIMOTHY
MAWO
239.59
03018317A1
979150
MATTHEWS, PHIL A
MAWO
457.28
03018325A1
971313
VALENTY, JEAN
MCWO
526.45
03018344A1
983724
SIMPSON, DURRELL T
MAWO
503.79
03018347A1
982232
GERARD, RAY
MCWO
564.01
03018364A1
983725
MASS, DORAM
MCWO
637.70
03018370Al
983693
ARNDT, DOROTHEA L
MCWO
526.45
03018386A1
983726
MCDOWELL, JOSEPHINE M
MCWO
402.92
03018401A1
981159
MUSSEHL, PATRICK A
MAWO
532.70
03018458A1
983727
PEARLSON, WILBUR H
MCWO
617.63
03018467A1
982197
BOWLES, VERAA
MAWO
457.28
03018523A1
983730
BIEN, TONY C
MAWO
537.67
03018528A1
983650
JOHNSON, BERNARD O
MCWO
551.49
03018549A1
970085
HEJNY, DOROTHY
MCWO
532.70
03018573A1
983736
JORGENSON, MILTON E
MCWO
630.15
03018579A1
983737
HAAS, ELIZABETH A
MCWO
532.70
03018580Al
983738
JONES, MARJORIE A
MCWO
564.01
03018584A1
983739
HALEY, LOUISE A
MCWO
557.76
03018586A1
983740
REYNOLDS, ANGELA E
MAWO
485.74
03018589A1
983741
COSTELLO, KIMBERLY K
MCWO
532.70
03018599A1
983362
RICHARD, MICHAEL K
MAWO
695.07
03018620Al
983742
MOSS, JEAN A
MAWO
514.59
03018632A1
980980
JOHNSON, MELVIN R
MAWO
564.01
03018634A1
983743
WRIGHT,TOMMYM
MAWO
527.05
03018681A1
971313
VALENTY, JEAN
MCWO
429.11
03018684A1
974676
SULLWOLD, IRENE
MCWO
429.11
03018707A1
983747
OWENS, JAMES R
MCWO
572.70
03018718A1
983749
LAFFERTY, WALTER D
MNAA
550.00
03018732A1
983635
SULLIVAN, MARY D
MCWO
538.97
03018733A1
981848
HOLMAN, MARGARET
MCWO
460.42
03018793A1
982197
BOWLES, VERAA
MAWO
486.13
030188llAl
983688
ACHESON, DONNA
MCWO
572.70
03018830Al
982725
FREEMAN, STORMIE D
MCWO
532.70
03018838A1
983640
SHANLEY, MAUREEN E
MCWO
308.58
03018870Al
970488
FABIO, ALMA
MCWO
532.70
03018875A1
983642
FEIST, DENNIS D
MCWO
585.23
03018906A1
980852
BROWN, ELSIE R
MCWO
429.11
03018944A1
983682
CARLSON, RUBY M
MAWO
457.28
03018965A1
983649
APFELBACHER, ANTHONY J
COWO
903.90
03018971A1
983650
JOHNSON, BERNARD O
MCWO
564.01
03018982A1
983652
LOEFFLER, NATHAN M
MAWO
585.36
03018989A1
983654
BROWN, LANCE P
MCWO
566.45
03018997A1
976865
CALDIE, VIRGINIA
MCWO
564.01
03019003A1
971313
VALENTY, JEAN
MCWO
520.18
03019034A1
982610
DANG, VYT
MAWO
550.74
03019050Al
983656
SALZMAN, WARREN A
MCWO
611.46
03019060Al
983752
KINCAID, MARGARET D
MCWO
520.18
03019062A1
983753
KVIDT, DONALD A
WCWO
146.67
03019066A1
983680
FRANCK, GREG N
MCWO
545.23
03019106A1
983754
MANSKE, LARRY R
MCWO
545.23
03019109A1
983686
FJELLMAN, VIVIAN B
MCWO
429.11
03019117A1
983756
BRENNAN, JEANNE M
MCWO
545.23
03019120Al
975573
LINDBLOM, HAZEL
MCWO
538.97
03019124A1
974978
JOY, MARGARET E
MCWO
520.18
03019125A1
977910
JARVIS, MAVIS E
MCWO
429.07
03019154A1
983760
KLEIN, CHRISTINE A
MCWO
304.68
03019175A1
983761
EVENSON, HAROLD W
MCWO
520.18
03019185A1
980889
BROWNING, DOROTHY H
MCWO
551.49
03019187A1
983762
ALTNOW, CONRAD E
MCWO
604.01
03019195A1
980889
BROWNING, DOROTHY H
MCWO
545.23
03019202A1
975073
MCCLUSKEY, WILLIAM
MCWO
508.18
03019264A1
983698
RAY, ANNETTEM
MCWO
564.01
03019316A1
983764
RIOPEL, CATHERINE R
MCWO
576.54
03019328A1
983768
PECK, WENDELL R
MCWO
585.23
03019344A1
983766
O'NEAL, MYRTIS
MAWO
445.74
03019380Al
983775
JOHNSON, ELIZABETH A
MCWO
405.26
03019425A1
983693
ARNDT, DOROTHEA L
MCWO
532.70
03019426A1
983918
KNAPP, WANDAI
MCWO
346.24
03019456A1
983912
OSLAND, NANCY
MCWO
526.45
03019465A1
983916
SOLHEID, VIOLA M
MCWO
656.49
03019482A1
983779
CLARK, TIM P
MNAA
966.50
17
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03019503A1
983781
DECKER, JOAN M
MCWO
643.97
03019538A1
983782
OTERO, NELLY
MCWO
560.18
03019565A1
983784
FRY, ARTHUR
MCWO
675.28
03019578A1
983891
LANG, GERALD J
MCWO
551.49
03019600Al
983785
JOHNSON, MARCENAJ
MCWO
560.18
03019612A1
983786
MCFEE, RICHARD
MNAA
926.50
03019619A1
983787
DAHL, CLIFFORD V
MCWO
564.01
03019641A1
983788
FONTAINE, BETTY L
MCWO
545.23
03019655A1
983789
THORN, BEVERLY
MAWO
486.13
03019712A1
975569
REILLY, MARGARET
MCWO
582.80
03019725A1
973695
LAPINSKI, JOSEPH C
MCWO
614.11
03019759A1
980624
MURAWSKI, KATHERINE L
MCWO
570.28
03019808A1
970781
BEUTEL, ELSIEJ
MCWO
557.76
03019823A1
977796
VOSS, BETTY
MCWO
472.94
03019855A1
973976
WHALEY, WILLIAM
MCWO
598.85
03019862A1
975001
MOEN, DONNA
MCWO
520.18
03019872A1
983808
KOCH, WILLIAM E
MCWO
557.15
03019897A1
983801
TARRAS, MARY ANN
MCWO
564.01
03019918A1
982667
BARNES, HENRY L
COWO
683.29
03019922A1
981344
WOLFE, LAWRENCE R
MCWO
532.70
03019932A1
983810
VANG, NHIA
MAWO
561.18
03019941A1
973887
MARZ, LAWRENCE
MCWO
526.45
03019952A1
975569
REILLY, MARGARET
MCWO
472.94
03019955A1
983812
TESSIER, LOU GENE R
MCWO
348.58
03019956A1
983813
BILOTTA, CARMEN A
MCWO
338.14
03019981A1
982505
THELIN, RICHARD
MCWO
538.97
03019993A1
983814
BARB, GARY H
MCWO
636.42
03020008A1
983817
HANSON, STEPHANIE A
MCWO
616.53
03020039A1
983822
FRANZ, MARY E
MCWO
345.46
03020049A1
982476
SUNDSTROM, CARREN A
MCWO
564.01
03020062A1
983831
FARBO, DARLENE M
MAWO
221.77
03020083A1
983832
ELERT, CONSTANCE L
MCWO
551.49
03020121A1
970801
TSCHIDA, MARIE A
MAWO
463.05
03020142A1
978950
STINEBAUGH, JEAN E
MCWO
538.97
03020197A1
983834
LUGER, JAMES L
MCWO
538.97
03020267A1
983842
BOMMERSBACH, DIANNA L
MAWO
486.13
03020313A1
983847
SAURO, JOSEPH
MCWO
533.08
03020323A1
975431
HAGERTY, THOMAS L
MCWO
538.97
03020325A1
983849
FRANZEN, BEVERLYJ
MCWO
447.90
03020361A1
983850
CHURCHILL, MATILDA
MAWO
497.74
03020386A1
983972
BRINKLEY, THEO
MNRR
977.80
03020468A1
983914
JONES, MARY
MAWO
508.82
03020512A1
983860
BORDSEN, DONALD T
MCWO
532.70
03020568A1
983862
PALM, STANLEY A
MCWO
560.18
03020571A1
978941
LEE, BERNADETTE A
MCWO
551.49
03020586A1
983640
SHANLEY, MAUREEN E
MCWO
308.58
03020669A1
983472
MUELLER, MAVISC
MCWO
551.49
03020670Al
983873
CAGE, WILLIE J
MAWO
497.28
03020674A1
983754
MANSKE, LARRY R
MCWO
551.49
03020692A1
983870
ANDERSON, OLIVE N
MCWO
466.69
03020707A1
983871
REMEDIOS, ESAI D
MAWO
485.74
03020737A1
983869
PARENTEAU, LEON M
MCWO
307.02
03020748A1
983876
ROTH, BERTHAA
MCWO
224.11
03020769A1
970528
CHARBONEAU, PATRICIA
MCWO
551.49
03020771A1
983877
ANDERSON, JUANITA M
MCWO
490.42
03020784A1
983880
FISHER, MARGARET
MCWO
429.11
0302080l Al
978075
CARVER, EDWIN K
MCWO
511.84
03020807A1
983884
DENEAU, DOROTHEA K
MCWO
454.16
03020816A1
982332
WADE, TREASA E
MAWO
486.13
03020862A1
978443
OMDAHL, GRACE E
MCWO
576.54
03020866A1
983888
LEMMONS, HELEN M
MCWO
526.45
03020867A1
980179
NELSON, MILDRED I
MCWO
532.70
03020872A1
983889
HENNESSY, MARGRET
MAWO
526.13
03020877A1
983890
LABORE, NORMAJ
MCWO
304.68
03020897A1
981070
SCHILLER, WILLIAM A
MCWO
532.70
03020918A1
983894
TRAN, QUANH H
MAWO
445.74
03020924A1
982763
O'CONNELL, DOLORES M
MCWO
403.70
03020957A1
976543
LOWERY, PAUL B
MCWO
576.54
03020987A1
983900
CHRISTENSEN, ELMER H
MCWO
611.46
03020998A1
983898
BOONE, JOHNIEM
MCWO
304.68
03021003A1
982503
ZELLMAN, VERNA L
MCWO
551.49
03021008A1
983899
(SHAM, ELIZABETH A
MCWO
578.97
03021056A1
983904
ALM, ARTHUR L
MCWO
569.91
03021071A1
974176
TRACY, KATHLEEN
MCWO
532.70
03021079A1
978903
MILLER, CLAUDIA J
MCWO
598.94
03021093A1
981406
PATTERSON, MARGARET
MCWO
520.18
03021095A1
973573
SMITH, EVELYN
MCWO
303.12
in
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
030211llAl
983907
KRUGER, ROBERT H
MNAA
943.90
03021134A1
983908
NAGEL, BECKY
MAWO
463.05
03021147A1
981894
MAAS, ROSE L
MCWO
564.01
03021162A1
977062
CARDINAL, HELEN
MCWO
533.08
03021215A1
983922
HERRMANN, VELMA D
MCWO
585.23
03021229A1
983924
PADDOCK, MONA
MCWO
526.45
03021273A1
982231
VANLANINGHAM, ELDON E
MCWO
551.49
03021274A1
981563
JARA, RUTH C
MCWO
526.45
03021296A1
983926
RICCI, MARY C
MCWO
459.11
03021298A1
983928
KASPER, FREDERICK P
MCWO
303.12
03021301A1
983957
JOHNSON, DOREEN L
MCWO
545.23
03021304A1
980179
NELSON, MILDRED I
MCWO
526.45
03021350Al
983932
SACKETT, BLANCHE L
MCWO
307.02
03021356A1
983933
BROWNING, ROBERT W
MCWO
526.45
03021373A1
983935
REHLING, MICHELLE
MNAA
100.00
03021376A1
983958
STREIT, ELNOR C
MCWO
564.01
03021405A1
983891
LANG, GERALD J
MCWO
669.01
03021442A1
983938
WERT, LARRY R
MCWO
616.54
03021446A1
972455
WHITE, DOROTHY
MCWO
551.49
03021460Al
983939
NAFSTAD, LARRELL J
MCWO
564.01
03021495A1
982735
SIMON, HANNAH S
MAWO
256.90
03021521A1
983940
TYLER, RUBY M
MCWO
532.70
03021559A1
983946
CARDENAS, GLORIA M
WCWO
141.58
03021562A1
980663
YANG, LAH
MAWO
551.49
03021563A1
984020
KABLAOUI, NAHI
MAWO
535.48
03021593A1
983953
RUSSELL, KENDALL B
MNAA
192.08
03021607A1
983954
NADDY, DOROTHY
MCWO
444.50
03021613A1
983955
HANSEN, EDGAR W
MCWO
582.80
03021666A1
983362
RICHARD, MICHAEL K
MAWO
479.60
03021682A1
983965
AUMER, JOHN P
MAWO
532.29
03021688A1
977436
BOGDAN, FRANCES
MCWO
447.90
03021694A1
971506
LONGCOR, DUANE
MCWO
545.23
03021708A1
983963
NELSEN, SONG C
WCWO
138.19
03021746A1
983966
HANDT, JOSEPH D
MAWO
531.90
03021760Al
983967
MITCHELL, JOSHUA A
MAWO
585.36
03021762A1
982173
JOBE, LORNA B
MCWO
585.23
03021795A1
983983
POWELL, RICHMOND T
MAWO
451.51
03021816A1
983987
FELTON, JAMEL
MAWO
579.59
03021841A1
976298
RAUEN, LUCILLE
MCWO
308.58
03021847A1
978581
LICHNER, JOANNE L
MCWO
567.63
03021874A1
983991
GAETKE, CARL F
MCWO
472.94
03021905A1
978148
WILSON, FLOYD
MCWO
564.01
03021937A1
984012
OLSEN, ROGER B
MCWO
605.21
03021948A1
983975
ZIEGELMANN, WAYNE H
MCWO
681.54
03021994A1
977737
ASHTON, GEORGE
MCWO
538.97
03022006A1
983977
PETERSON, DAVID A
MCWO
616.54
03022007A1
983978
LARSEN, CLARA
MCWO
570.28
03022046A1
974417
BASKA, VITA
MCWO
310.14
03022049A1
983980
STEELE, JAMES L
MAWO
591.13
03022065A1
970466
DEVANGE, CHARLES
MCWO
477.90
03022076A1
983354
HOLLINGSWORTH, PATRICIAJ
MCWO
303.12
03022104A1
982316
HILL, JONATHAN
MCWO
564.01
03022127A1
984078
MCMAHON, LYDIA F
MCWO
585.23
03022136A1
978443
OMDAHL, GRACE E
MCWO
475.39
03022143A1
976936
FISHER, MARCELLA
MCWO
622.80
03022201A1
984116
CORMIER, HELEN
MCWO
511.84
03022220Al
978067
ROSEN, ISADORE
MCWO
532.70
03022231A1
973772
PETERSON, BEVERLY
MNAA
937.80
03022260Al
975978
DRABCZAK, HENRY
MCWO
573.90
03022279A1
984024
SOMMERS, PHYLLIS K
MCWO
520.18
03022285A1
977636
WAKEFIELD, EILEEN
MCWO
532.70
03022335A1
980889
BROWNING, DOROTHY H
MCWO
532.70
03022342A1
984029
PAUL, FRED L
MCWO
598.94
03022362A1
984034
ELSTRAN, GERALD V
MCWO
560.18
03022399A1
984041
MENESES, CIRO
MAWO
525.65
03022402A1
984042
KUPFERSCHMIDT, JOSEPH J
MCWO
511.84
03022420Al
984044
BLAIR, ALICIA
MAWO
531.90
03022449A1
984050
GASPERLIN, ALBERT J
MCWO
303.12
03022461A1
984051
HAYDEN, MATTHEW J
MCWO
614.33
03022535A1
983467
PERRAULT, DONALD K
MCWO
560.18
03022536A1
984062
CAPERS, ROYCE J
MAWO
233.82
03022541A1
984059
GERRY, JAM ES
MCWO
250.21
03022555A1
984065
HUBER, LUCILLE M
MCWO
538.97
03022574A1
983662
FITZGERALD, DEVANTAE M
MAWO
451.51
03022605A1
984141
WARNER, EDWARD
MAWO
252.28
03022608A1
984068
RICHARDSON, KENNETH E
MNAA
628.76
03022622A1
984069
PETERSON, ROY W
MCWO
560.18
19
Call Number
Account #
Patient/Account Name
Schedule
Balance
03022630Al
972570
JOHNSON, LILLIAN M
MCWO
526.45
03022631A1
984073
SORG, EMMAE
MCWO
564.01
03022649A1
982500
SAKRY, JAMES
MCWO
582.80
03022656A1
974486
LUEBESMIER, LORETTA
MCWO
307.80
03022660Al
977830
JOHNSON, WINNIFRED L
MCWO
564.01
03022662A1
978654
DURAND, RICHELLE A
MAWO
147.34
03022668A1
984075
LANGE, MICHELLE G
AAA
184.26
03022688A1
984109
PERKINS, BEVERLY
MAWO
468.82
03022698A1
984078
MCMAHON, LYDIA F
MCWO
572.70
03022703A1
983247
GUTH, ELEANORE A
MCWO
303.90
03022723A1
972615
FERN, MARY JEAN
MCWO
447.90
03022730Al
984083
MCINTYRE, MARY M
MCWO
526.45
03022752A1
984084
MATLINSKY, SOPHIE J
MCWO
564.01
03022764A1
984086
KRAFT, SHANE P
MAWO
608.56
03022816A1
984090
WOLDEMICHAEL, MESKERENE N
MAWO
523.94
03022831A1
974087
WALTERS, EUGENE
MCWO
598.94
03022838A1
980980
JOHNSON, MELVIN R
MCWO
472.94
03022859A1
976640
MILLER, THOMAS
MCWO
526.45
03022860Al
984093
STEJSKEL, GENEVIEVE M
MCWO
580.15
03022866A1
982768
KELLY, PATRICK R
MCWO
585.23
03022875A1
982092
COOPER, PALMALIN M
MNAA
60.37
03022877A1
984095
KELSEY, PATRICK E
MAWO
485.74
03022881A1
984096
ITOKA, PHILIP K
MAWO
491.90
03022882A1
984098
THILGEN, ADELE H
MCWO
628.84
03022888A1
984099
SEUBERTH, SCOTT W
MNAA
977.80
03022915A1
981547
XIONG, SHENG
MCWO
605.21
03022923A1
984102
BANNIE, VERA L
MCWO
347.02
03022953A1
983263
SCHULTZ, MELVIN D
MCWO
303.12
03022955A1
984103
YANG, MELANIE P
MAWO
554.98
03022956A1
984105
PASSONS, DAVID E
MNAA
1,020.20
03022966A1
984106
COLEMAN, SIDNEY
MCWO
598.68
03022990Al
982032
ECKSTROM, CLARENCE W
MCWO
520.18
03022998A1
980889
BROWNING, DOROTHY H
MCWO
435.38
03023036A1
984107
MADRIGAL, REGINA M
MAWO
526.13
03005074AAl
982635
WENDTLAND, TANYA A
MAWO
128.04
03005074BAl
982651
WENDTLAND, SCOTT A
MAWO
17.07
03016957AAl
980308
FORSBERG, TAMMY L
MNAA
832.30
03017361 BA1
983578
WARD, CARMINAM
MNAA
955.20
03018038AAl
983705
KEOSAY, BOBBY S
AAA
488.90
03018038CAl
983709
KEOSAY, KIMBERLY K
AAA
366.40
03018516BAl
980173
LINDER, LAURA L
MCWO
129.01
03019136BAl
983827
VRUNO, LORI M
MCWO
508.82
03022352BAl
984031
HARRINGTON, MELANIE A
MNRR
1,138.00
Total Patient Accounts on this
Report: 1198 Total Account
Balances for this Report:
$610,112.57
go
Call Category Summary
BKWO
COWO /CMS /COLL/TS I /AAA
CRIM
DECE
MAW O
MCWO
MNRR/MNAA
OTHR
VAWO
WCWO
Bankruptcy Write Off
Collections Write Off
Crime Victim Write Off
Deceased Write Off
Medical Assistance Write Off
Medicare
MN Revenue Recapture Program
Miscellaneous Balances
Veterans Write Off
Workers' Comp Write Off
Total
949.10
25,439.46
116.26
3,899.83
92,878.53
426,748.03
57,138.32
632.84
620.00
1,690.20
$610,112.57
21
AGENDA NO. H -8
I' _ T e 1:11 0 10 7_\ 0:11 I i 1:41
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: Designation of Depositories for Investments
DATE: December 6, 2005
State law, Chapter 427 requires that cities from time to time re- designate financial
institutions as depositories for city investments. The last time this was done was in
December 2003 when depositories were approved for the period through December
31, 2005.
When city investments are made, quotations are obtained from securities dealers
who are on the Federal Reserve Bank's list of primary dealers (e.g., Citigroup),
securities dealers that are subsidiaries of financial institutions that have been
designated as depositories (e.g., Wells Fargo Brokerage Services) and RBC Dain
Rauscher which is the securities dealer for the League of Minnesota Cities 4M Fixed
Rate Program.
The attached resolution does not include any new depositories. If a financial
institution that is not a designated depository becomes a good option for city
investments in the future, it will be recommended to the Council for designation as a
depository as a separate agenda item. Adoption of the attached resolution is
recommended.
Attachment
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED, that the following be and hereby are selected as
depositories for time deposits of the City of Maplewood:
Washington County Bank
Wells Fargo Bank
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the deposits in any of the above
depositories shall not exceed the amount of F.D.I.C. insurance covering such deposit
unless collateral or a bond is furnished as additional security, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that funds in the above depositories may be
withdrawn and wire transferred to any other depository of the city by the request of
the Finance Director or Assistant Finance Director.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that these depository designations are effective
until December 31, 2007.
P:\FI NANCEM ORD \PERM \I NVESTDEP. DOC
OAF
UTe7:110107G10 :10
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: Budget Adjustments for 2005 Bond Issue
DATE: December 6, 2005
Budget changes are needed for the 2005 and 2006 financial transactions for the
2005 bond issue. Attached are detailed listings of the changes that are needed.
It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to make the appropriate
2005 and 2006 budget adjustments.
PTERM\05BONDS&DOC
File Name: 2005 bond issue budget changes
Location: c: \excel \dsbudget
Date: 06- Dec -05
Prepared by: GB
Total all debt service funds
2005 2006
Budget Budget
BUDGET CHANGES
2005 BOND ISSUES REVISED TOTALS
2005 2006 2005 2006
Revenue:
Property taxes
2,789,840
2,986,630
2,789,840
2,986,630
Tax abatement - Maplewood Mall
0
0
0
0
Special assessments
692,620
1,476,110
186,140 692,620
1,662,250
State Street Construction Aid
0
270,000
0
270,000
State Street Maintenance Aid
0
199,110
0
199,110
Interest on investments
137,660
107,800
100 310 137,760
108,110
Total revenue
3,620,120
495,000
0
5,039,650
100 186,450 3,620,220
5,226,100
Expenditures
Fees for Service
0
0
0
0
Debt service :
Principal:
Regular
3,040,000
4,065,000
3,040,000
4,065,000
Called bonds
495,000
0
495,000
0
Interest
1,264,780
2,031,940
77,510
1,264,780
2,109,450
Paying agent fees
5,330
6,120
500
400
5,830
6,520
Other:
Interest - interfund loan
45,870
8,300
45,870
8,300
Investment management fee
11,020
3,110
10
20
11,030
3,130
Total expenditures
4,862,000
6,114,470
510
77,930
4,862,510
6,192,400
Excess (deficit) of revenue over expenditures
(1,241,880)
(1,074,820)
(410)
108,520
(1,242,290)
(966,300)
Other financing sources:
Operating transfers from -
Debt Service Funds
0
0
0
0
Tax Increment Fund
264,130
285,290
264,130
285,290
Sewer Fund
0
130,140
0
130,140
Water Fund
33,460
33,460
33,460
33,460
Premiums /Discounts on bonds issued
0
0
0
0
Bond Proceeds
0
0
13,200
13,200
0
Excess (deficit) of revenue and other financing
sources over expenditures
(944,290)
(625,930)
12,790
108,520
(931,500)
(517,410)
Fund Balance - January 1
6,645,207
7,189,536
6,645,207
7,202,326
Residual equity transfers (to close funds)
0
0
0
0
Fund Balance - December 31
5,700,917
6,563,606
12,790
108,520
5,713,707
6,684,916
2
File Name: dsstate
Location: c: \excel \dsbudget
Date: 06- Dec -05
Prepared by: GB
Fund 353 G. 0. Improvement Bonds - 2005A
2005 2005 2006
Budget Re -est Budget
Revenue
Property taxes
0
0
0
Special assessments
0
0
186,140
State Street Construction Aid
0
0
0
State Street Maintenance Aid
0
0
0
Interest on investments
0
100
310
Total revenue
0
100
186,450
Expenditures:
Fees for Service
0
0
0
Debt service:
Principal:
Regular
0
0
0
Called bonds
0
0
0
Interest
0
0
77,510
Paying agent fees
0
500
400
Other:
Interest - interfund loan
0
0
0
Investment management fee
0
10
20
Total expenditures
0
510
77,930
Excess (deficit) of revenue over expenditures
0
(410)
108,520
Other financing sources:
Transfers in (out):
Capital Projects Funds
0
0
0
Debt Service Funds
0
0
0
Tax Increment Fund
0
0
0
Sewer Fund
0
0
0
Water Fund
0
0
0
Premiums /(Discounts) on bonds issued
0
0
0
Bond Proceeds
0
13,200
0
Excess (deficit) of revenue and other financing
sources over expenditures
0
12,790
108,520
Fund Balance - January 1
0
0
12,790
Fund Balance - December 31
0
12,790
121,310
Cash Balance - January 1
0
0
12,790
Cash Balance - December 31
0
12,790
121,310
due from other funds
due to other funds
IN
Feb Principal, Interest
Aug Interest
353 - 000 - 000 -3110
353 - 000 - 000 -3801
353 - 000 - 0004820
353 - 000 - 0004840
353 - 000 - 0004930
3
Agenda Item H10
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
CC: City Clerk
FROM: Steve Lukin, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF RELIEF ASSOCIATION ASSETS
FROM MAPLEWOOD TO OAKDALE
DATE: December 6, 2006
INTRODUCTION
In December of 1996, Maplewood Fire decided to terminate its responsibility of covering the south
half of Oakdale. Several firefighters asked if they could transfer to the Oakdale Fire Department
and bring with them their relief association years of service and money. The relief associations
and the cities agreed to a combined service agreement but no money was transferred.
Maplewood retained the money accrued by each person transferred and these accounts were
frozen at the benefit level they were at, at the time of their transfer. A total of ten individuals
transferred to Oakdale.
This year, the Maplewood and Oakdale Relief Associations asked Senator Chuck Wiger to
sponsor a bill in the 2005 legislative session that would allow the assets to be transferred. The
legislation was passed to allow this transfer to take place. The final step in this process is to have
the City Council approve the transfer of these assets which is in the best interest of all parties
involved. This transfer is necessary to allow both relief associations to report their assets and
liabilities more accurately when filing their Schedules 1 and 2.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the City Council approve the agreement between the Maplewood Fire Relief
Association and the Oakdale Fire Relief Association allowing this transfer of assets to take place.
Agenda Item H11
Ew4 L , I Will N4101:41
TO: City Manager
FROM: Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer
Erin Laberee, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Gladstone North Area Street Improvements - City Project 04 -15:
Resolution for Modification of Existing Construction Contract, Change Order
No. 1
DATE: December 2, 2005
INTRODUCTION
During construction there are often unforeseen changes from the original plans and specifications. The
city council will consider approving the attached resolution directing the modification of the existing
construction contract and revising the project financing plan to reflect the receipt of payments for private
driveway work.
Background
The changes described in Change Order No. 1 total $13,735.17. The changes are in the scope of driveway
improvements to 1580 Grandview Ave, brush and debris disposal, concrete barriers required for traffic
control, and additional rock used for storm sewer pipe stabilization located in poor soils. Additional
revenue has been received from the property owner at 1580 Grandview for the driveway improvements.
The original contract amount is for $1,766,328.58. Change order 1 will increase the contract amount to
$1,780,063.75.
Budget Impact
No increase in the project budget for the Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, City Project 04 -15, is
required as these extras fall within the original approved budget.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution Directing the Modification of the
Existing Construction Contract for the Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, City Project 04 -15.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Change Order No. 1
3. Location Map
Agenda Item H11
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PROJECT 04 -15, CHANGE ORDER 1
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Project 04 -15, Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, and has let a
construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and
designated as Improvement Project 04 -15, Change Order No. 1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that:
1. The mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing
contract by executing said Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $13,735.17. The
revised contract amount is $1,780,063.75.
Agenda Item H11
CHANGE ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Project Name: Gladstone North Area Street Improvement Project Change Order No.: 1
Project No.: 04 -15 Date: 12 -2 -05
Contractor: T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc.
The following changes shall be made in the contract documents: (Work not covered under contract)
Unit
Description Unit Quantity Price Total
Labor, equipment and material EA 1 $7,256.31 $7,256.31
to install drive at 158 Grandview
Removal and disposal of brush EA
Concrete barriers for traffic control EA
Additional rock for pipe installation EA
Original Contract: $1,766,328.58
Net Change of Prior Change
Order No. 1 to No. 1 : $13,735.17
Change This Change Order: $13,735.14
1 $1,600.00 $1,600.00
1 $1,651.82 $1,651.82
1 $3,227.04 $3,227.04
TOTAL $ 13,735.17
Revised Contract: $1,780,063.75
Approved
Mayor
Recommended
Agreed to by Contractor by
Engineer
Title
GERVAIS AVE.
Fl
COPE CT. COPE
)R' _
J LARK W
`_J
1 LEALAND RD. —
JUNC TION Q AVE.
1 P F R F BURKE
A�
D —
J �'- Ll
GRANDVIEW AVE.
VIKING DR. c
SHERREN AVE.
Knu Head Lake
AVE.
AVE. LARK
° LAURIE Q
� Sherwoodz �
AND
S HURST Pork z n AVE.
CD
BURKE
m
LN F-� CiR ELDR IDGE
c
E. BELMON LN.
h
SKILL �P VE. SKILLMAN AVE.
Lij l -
h 0
� SHR� Cnn PVE � v
J D w Robinhood
D RY AN = U U Park R
rn
TRAIL
Flicek
Park H
n c.�
z
w
F
NTON AVE.
0 4
4- Gloster
Ct
Cr
i ?
J
n Pork
_
FRISBIE AVE.
o
Ln
IF RIP LEY
/
w z
Q HII o F
U z
_ Q
N I AVE. :20
Vl N Q
LM ER AV E.
LLJ I II D
AVE. � C — f) �\
AVE. John G
•
•
■
/m
I BURKE // Al
.J
/ GATEWAY
HARRIS AVE.
ROSEWOOD
AVE. S.
0
SU MME?, AVE.
I �I
Project location
no scale
Exhibit 1
Project Location
Gladstone North Area Streets 04 -15
Agenda Item H12
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager, City Council Members
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer
DuWayne Konewko, Environmental Manager
SUBJECT: Approve Distribution of Maplewood's Recycling Information
DATE: November 30, 2005
INTRODUCTION
Staff, Environmental Committee, and Eureka Recycling have compiled the following attachments for
distribution to the residents of the City:
• Maplewood's Weekly Recycling Schedule Map
• A post card for the residents south of 1 -94 announcing effective January 6, 2005, recycling will take
place every Friday. This district was previously serviced on Tuesdays (front/back).
• Lawn signs that will be placed at different locations in this new Friday district informing the residents
of this change in recycling days (sign is 22' x 36 ").
• A recycling brochure that will be mailed out to every resident in the City. The mailing is specific to
the day of the week that recycling will occur in each respective district. The mailing also includes
instructions on what can and cannot be recycled. Stickers that the residents can place on their
calendars reminding them of the weekly recycling schedule are also included.
• Multi- family educational fact sheet for distribution at multi - family facilities (front /back)
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending that City Council approve the distribution of the recycling information to the
residents of the City.
Attachments: (A packet of all attachments will be provided for the Mayor and Council.)
1. Maplewood's Weekly Recycling Schedule Map
2. Post cards for residents in the new Friday district
3. Lawn sign display
4. Recycling brochure mailing
5. Multi- family educational information
m l 1� 1111 1 1 1, Jill, III, III IuI,�I,Irqip�IMI 1
.
....
Monday
.............
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
OEM
ME
0 1 By i
2828 Kennedy Street NE
Minneapolis, MN 55413
or 4
Your last Tuesday collection: December 20, 2005
Your first Friday collection: January 8, 2008
Holiday reminder: During the weeks of Memorial Day,
the 4th of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving, and Christmas
your recycling collection will move to Saturday.
Maplewood's curbside recycling program is sponsored by Eureka
Recycling, the City of Maplewood, and the State of Minnesota
SCORE funds through Ramsey County.
`Maplewood South of Highway 94
O'
www.eurekarecyclin
Nonp,nfii O� c.
US Posiane
PAID
Saint Paul, Il4N
Permit No. 2187
Im
ME
ko
E-V'e ;�W-'�ek!
Yy
CON
rf I I s
M
uf 7
if
I
If 7ry to
1
1,f
rrk .E
S M
I
w 4 I
M
j o ; u
A, x3
.0
S M
—0-
7
N
W T F S
tl
11
T
I
If
id 4 1f f
fk r
ft, I iA I < 1.(
hx
N W 'I V
Np
M
tl
11
T
,I
1
c
7
fk r
ft, I iA I < 1.(
hx
N W 'I V
What can I do to help make.
Talk to your neighbors!
Check in with other people in your building (especially new residents!)
and make sure they know where the carts are and how to recycle. Call
us at (651) 222 -SORT (7678) and we can send you free flyers to pass
out and posters to hang in your laundry room, lobby or on your door.
2828 Kennedy Street NE
Minneapolis, MN 55413
■
Volunteer to be
a cart monitor.
We can't pick up your recycling unless
the carts are trash free. Once a cart has
trash in it, it attracts more trash, so
keeping a close eye on what's in your
carts will help keep your materials clean
and recyclable!
Nuniprofit OiE.
CS I'nstatec.
Smut F:'aul, R![N
P;,nn3t Ntr. 2787
This multifamily recycling program is sponsored by Eureka
Recycling, the city, and the State of Minnesota SCORE funds
through Ramsey County.
0 Printed on 100% postconsumer recycled paper, processed without the use of chlorine.
Agenda Item H13
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: December 5, 2005
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
FROM: Sherrie Le
Human Resource Director
SUBJECT: 2006 Pay Rates for Temporary/Seasonal & Casual Part -time Employees
Please forward the attached resolution to the City Council for approval. I recommend this
resolution be adopted to replace the existing resolution establishing pay rates for temporary,
seasonal, and casual part -time employees. The changes are underlined.
RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of the attached resolution is recommended.
RESOLUTION (Proposed)
WHEREAS, according to the Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations act, part -time employees
who do not work more than 14 hour per week and temporary /seasonal employees who work in positions that
do not exceed 67 days in a calendar year, or 100 days for full -time students, are not public employees and are
therefore not eligible for membership in a public employee union.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following pay ranges and job classifications are
hereby established for temporary /seasonal and casual part-time (14 hours or fewer /wk) employees effective
August 1, 2005, upon Council approval.
Accountant
$10.00 -30.00
per hour
Accounting Technician
$9.00 -22.00
per hour
Administrative Assistant
$9.00 - 23.00
per hour
Background Investigator
$25.00 -35.00
per hour
Building Inspector
$14.00 -35.00
per hour
Building Attendant
$6.15 -12.00
per hour
Clerk
$6.50 -11.00
per hour
Office Specialist
$8.50 - 16.00
per hour
Customer Service Assistant
$6.15 -11.00
per hour
CSO
$8.00 -16.00
per hour
CSO /Paramedic
$12.00 - 23.00
per hour
Data Entry Operator
$8.00 -12.00
per hour
Dispatcher
$15.00 -20.00
per hour
Election Judge
$6.50 -12.00
per hour
Election Judge - Assistant Chair
$7.00 -13.00
per hour
Election Precinct Chair
$7.50 -14.00
per hour
Engineering Aide
$7.00 -16.00
per hour
Engineering Technician
$10.00 -16.00
per hour
Fire Department Custodian
$600 -690
per quarter
Firefighter- Paid - Per -Call
$18.00
per drill
Intern
$6.50 -20.00
per hour
IT Technician
$15.00 -20.00
per hour
Laborer
$6.50 -12.00
per hour
Lifeguard
$6.15 -14.00
per hour
Receptionist
$7.50 -11.00
per hour
Recreation Instructor /Leader
$6.15 -30.00
per hour
Recreation Official
$6.15 -25.00
per hour
Recreation Worker
$6.15 -18.00
per hour
Theater Technician
$20.00 -30.00
per hour
Vehicle Technician
$9.00 -15.00
per hour
Video Coordinator*
$11.00 -19.00
per hour
Video Technician*
$10.00 -18.00
per hour
Water Safety Instructor (WSI)
$7.50 -14.00
per hour
WSI & Head Lifeguard Differential
$1.00
per hour
(Lifeguards or WSIs working as Head
Lifeguards; Lifeguards working as WSIs)
*Video positions shall be paid a guaranteed minimum flat fee of $50 for 4 hours or less.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager shall have the authority to set the pay rate
within the above ranges.
RESOLUTION (Current)
WHEREAS, according to the Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations act, part -time employees
who do not work more than 14 hour per week and temporary /seasonal employees who work in positions that
do not exceed 67 days in a calendar year, or 100 days for full -time students, are not public employees and are
therefore not eligible for membership in a public employee union.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following pay ranges and job classifications are
hereby established for temporary /seasonal and casual part-time (14 hours or fewer /wk) employees effective
August 1, 2005, upon Council approval.
Accountant
$10.00 -30.00
per hour
Accounting Technician
$9.00 -22.00
per hour
Administrative Assistant
$9.00 -20.00
per hour
Background Investigator
$25.00 -35.00
per hour
Building Inspector
$14.00 -35.00
per hour
Building Attendant
$6.15 -12.00
per hour
Clerk
$6.50 -11.00
per hour
Clerk- Typist
$8.50 -15.00
per hour
Customer Service Assistant
$6.15 -11.00
per hour
CSO
$8.00 -16.00
per hour
CSO /Paramedic
$12.00 -20.00
per hour
Data Entry Operator
$8.00 -12.00
per hour
Dispatcher
$15.00 -20.00
per hour
Election Judge
$6.50 -12.00
per hour
Election Judge - Assistant Chair
$7.00 -13.00
per hour
Election Precinct Chair
$7.50 -14.00
per hour
Engineering Aide
$7.00 -16.00
per hour
Engineering Technician
$10.00 -16.00
per hour
Fire Department Custodian
$575 -690
per quarter
Firefighter - paid -per -call
$18.00
per drill
Intern
$6.50 -20.00
per hour
IT Technician
$15.00 -20.00
per hour
Laborer
$6.50 -12.00
per hour
Lifeguard
$6.15 -14.00
per hour
Receptionist
$7.50 -11.00
per hour
Recreation Instructor /Leader
$6.15 -30.00
per hour
Recreation Official
$6.15 -25.00
per hour
Recreation Worker
$6.15 -18.00
per hour
Secretary
$9.00 -21.00
per hour
Theater Technician
$20.00 -30.00
per hour
Vehicle Technician
$9.00 -15.00
per hour
Video Coordinator*
$11.00 -19.00
per hour
Video Technician*
$10.00 -18.00
per hour
Water Safety Instructor (WSI)
$7.50 -14.00
per hour
WSI & Head Lifeguard Differential
$1.00
per hour
(Lifeguards or WSIs working as Head
Lifeguards; Lifeguards working as WSIs)
*Video positions shall be paid a guaranteed minimum flat fee of $50 for 4 hours or less.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager shall have the authority to set the pay rate
within the above ranges.
Agenda Item H.14
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM:
Shann Finwall, Planner, AICP
SUBJECT:
Conditional Use Permit Review - Schlomka Landscaping, Inc.
APPLICANT:
Paul Schlomka
LOCATION:
2511 Carver Avenue
DATE:
December 5, 2005
INTRODUCTION
The two conditional use permits (CUPS) associated with Schlomka Landscaping, Inc. are due for
review. Paul Schlomka operates the landscape business out of a 4,224- square -foot pole barn he
constructed on his Farm Residence zoned property at 2511 Carver Avenue.
1- 7e[83:(H:Zo1lll1.U7
September 10, 2001: The city council amended the Farm Residence (F) zoning district to allow a
landscape business, or any other similar use, as an accessory use with a CUP. Refer to the
September 10, 2001, city council minutes attached (Attachment 3). Mr. Schlomka prompted the
amendment with a request to the city for a home occupation license to operate a landscape business
from his Farm Residence zoned property.
September 24, 2001: The city council approved two CUPS for Schlomka Landscaping, Inc. as
follows: 1) a CUP to operate a landscape business within the Farm Residence (F) zoning district;
and 2) a CUP to build a 4,224- square -foot, 18.5- foot -high pole barn. Refer to the September 24,
2001, city council minutes attached (Attachment 4).
November 13, 2002; January 12, 2004: The city council approved the extension of the two CUPS for
Schlomka Landscaping, Inc.
April 11, 2005: The city council approved the extension of the two CUPS for Schlomka Landscaping
Inc. on the condition that Mr. Schlomka obtain a grading permit and complete all required grading
and erosion control measures for a berm which was being constructed without the required grading
permit. Refer to the April 11, 2005, city council minutes attached (Attachment 5).
DISCUSSION
Earlier this year Mr. Schlomka located a large stockpile of dirt along the northeast side of his lot. Mr.
Schlomka explained that he had placed the material there in order to extend the existing berm, which
was a requirement of his CUP in order to create screening from the adjacent residential property.
Stockpiling of material and /or moving dirt of this magnitude onto a lot in order to create a berm
required a grading permit from the City of Maplewood. The grading permit would allow the city's
engineering department to review and inspect the site for appropriate erosion control and turf
establishment. This is especially important on this property because it is located near Fish Creek,
which is an environmentally sensitive area. Mr. Schlomka did not obtain the required grading permit
and as such was in violation of city code.
Mr. Schlomka obtained the required grading permit on April 8, 2005, and has completed all of the
required grading and erosion control measures for the berm. In addition, Mr. Schlomka has been in
compliance with all other conditions of his two CUPS. Therefore, staff recommends an extension to
the two CUPS with review again in one year.
INx8101MI MI:Iki U7e I
Staff recommends that the city council extend the two conditional use permits associated with
Schlomka Landscaping located at 2511 Carver Avenue again in one year to ensure continued
compliance with all conditions.
p:sec24 -28 \2511 Carver — Schlomka 2005 CUP Review (2)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. September 10, 2001 City Council Minutes
4. September 24, 2001 City Council Minutes
5. April 11, 2005, City Council Minutes
Attachment 1
o
0 o ° g
0
a�
V
Q
0
mo o❑
;eK o /
0� IE2
0 0
CJ a
Da
a
Q
N
Location Map
3
U
E
pC p •.. -o!.
89J
\C
1 uhcenonee�,
1 beef m.ougnovl
Ntf Pno
. /P;ne Ireea - Cvbert
P.eomef
Slerepe 9v.i6ny
2
5�
u;acenenemf
Core,.
2 /
y
V<a INaugn9al
f]B Acres
pC p •.. -o!.
89J
\C
1 uhcenonee�,
1 beef m.ougnovl
Ntf Pno
. /P;ne Ireea - Cvbert
P.eomef
Slerepe 9v.i6ny
2
u;acenenemf
Core,.
v l
V<a INaugn9al
inb free /
pC p •.. -o!.
89J
\C
1 uhcenonee�,
1 beef m.ougnovl
Ntf Pno
. /P;ne Ireea - Cvbert
P.eomef
Slerepe 9v.i6ny
2
Centerline of Comer Ave. —
wr . - CARvE� RvE.
N
Site Plan
t..a•
Core,.
v l
Street E.,- m
Centerline of Comer Ave. —
wr . - CARvE� RvE.
N
Site Plan
Attachment 3
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, September 10, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 01 -19
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Code Amendment — F (Farm Residence) District (Second Reading)
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the following ordinance amendment in order to
allow landscaping and other similar businesses in the farm zone with a conditional use permit.
ORDINANCE 814
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances:
Section 1. This amendment adds subdivision (5) to Section 36 -52 (Farm Residence District Conditional
Uses) (additions are underlined):
Section 36 -52. Conditional uses.
The following uses may be permitted by conditional use permit:
(1) Any use allowed by conditional use in the R -1 Residence District, except that equipment and
vehicles used for on -site farming or equipment and vehicles used for an on -site landscaping
business, or anv other similar business approved with a conditional use permit as described
in Section 36 -52(5) below, shall be a permitted use.
(5) As an accessory use to residential property, a landscaping business, or any other similar use that is
determined to be the same general character as a landscape business, if on a parcel of land which
is four (4) acres or larger. Where there is a question concerning the appropriateness of a similar
use as a conditional use within the farm residence district, the planning commission shall review
the question and forward a recommendation to the city council for final determination. The
landscaping or similar type business must meet the findings for a conditional use permit as well as
the following:
a. No exterior storage of commercial vehicles, equipment, or material associated with the business.
Storage of these items must be in an approved accessory structure that meets the findings below:
1. The accessory structure must meet the size and heieht requirements as specified in Section
36 -77 (Accessory Structures).
2. When adjacent a residential lot, the accessory structure must comply with the setback
requirements specified in Section 36- 28(c)(6)(b) (Additional Design Standards). When
adjacent to a commercial lot, the accessory structure must comply with Section 36 -71 and
36 -72 Residential Side and Rear Setbacks for Accessory Structures)-
3. When adjacent a residential lot, the accessory structure, and other areas of the lot where
deemed necessary, shall comply with Section 36- 27(a), (b), (c), and (d) (Landscaping and
Screenin
b. No more than one (1) nonresident employee shall be allowed to work on the premises.
C. The hours of operation are limited to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
2. Code Amendment — Rezonings (Second Reading)
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the following proposed ordinance amendment
changing the voting requirements for zoning code amendments and zoning map changes:
Attachment 4
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, September 24, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 01 -22
3. 7:30 Schlomlca Landscaping Inc. (2511 Carver Avenue)
a. Conditional Use Permit (Landscaping Business in F Zone)
b. Conditional Use Permit (Over -Sized Accessory Structure)
a. Assistant City Manager Coleman introduced the staff report.
b. Associate Planner Finwall provided specifics of the report.
C. Commissioner Rossbach presented details from the September 4, 01 Planning
Commission Meeting.
d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public meeting.
The following people were heard:
Paul Schlomlca, applicant, 2511 Carver Avenue, Maplewood
e. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the following resolutions for the Conditional Use
Permit for a Landscaping Business in an F Zone and a Conditional Use Permit for an Over -Sized
Accessory Structure with staff revisions:
RESOLUTION O1 -09 -89
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Paul Schlomlca applied for a conditional use permit to operate a landscaping business within
a farm residence zoning district;
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 2511 Carver Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
The legal description is: Subject to HWY AVE and Easements, Part of Southeasterly of Northwesterly L of SD
HWY of W V2 of NW Y4 of NE Y4 of SEC 24, TN 28, RN 22.
WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Property Identification Number for this property is
24- 28 -22 -12 -0005;
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
On September 4, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
conditional use permit.
2. On September 24, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted the
public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and present written statements.
The city council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described conditional
use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because:
The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the
city's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would
be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because
of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff,
vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the
development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval of the conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions:
1. The business must be conducted solely within the house or an accessory structure.
2. No exterior storage is allowed, including all commercial vehicles, equipment, and supplies associated with
the business.
3. No more than one (1) nonresident employee shall be allowed to work on the premises.
4. The landscape business hours of operation are limited to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday.
5. Any exterior fighting associated with the business must not produce glare on adjacent residential
properties nor shall it exceed 0.4- foot - candles at the property line.
6. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
The conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the city council in one year.
8. The conditional use permit shall be reviewed in the event the property is transferred to a new owner who
intends to operate a landscaping business, or similar business, from the property.
9. If the conditional use permit for a landscape business is voluntarily abandoned and ceases for a
continuous period of one year or more, the conditional use permit will become null and void.
RESOLUTION O1 -09 -90
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Paul Schlomka applied for a conditional use permit to construct a 4,224- square -foot pole
barn within a farm - residence zoning district;
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 2511 Carver Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
The legal description is: Subject to HWY AVE and Easements, Part of Southeasterly of Northwesterly L of SD
HWY of W V2 of NW Y4 of NE Y4 of SEC 24, TN 28, RN 22.
WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Property Identification Number for this property is
24- 28 -22 -12 -0005.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
On September 4, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
conditional use permit.
2. On September 24, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted the
public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and present written statements.
The city council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described conditional
use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because:
The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the
city's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would
be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because
of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff,
vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
9
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the
development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval of the conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions:
The pole barn is limited in size to 4,224 square feet in area and 18.5 feet in height.
2. The pole barn must maintain at least a 50 -foot setback from the adjacent residential property.
3. The applicant will obtain all necessary permits for the construction of the pole barn.
Prior to issuance of a building permit the owner will submit for staff s review and approval a revised site
plan showing a 6 -foot high berm to be constructed along the east side of the pole barn and driveway. A
staggered row of 12, 6- foot -high evergreens must be installed on the berm.
5. Prior to the building department finalizing the building permit, the owner will do the following:
a. Remove the stockpile dirt and rock from the north side of the property. These materials must be
removed from the property entirely, used in the construction of the pole barn, or stored inside the
pole barn.
b. Install the required berm and landscaping.
6. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
The conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the city council in one year.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen. Ayes -All
10
Attachment 5
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:02 P.M. Monday, April 11, 2005
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 05 -07
� � 81 • 7
2. Conditional Use Permit Review — Schlomka Landscaping (2511 Carver Avenue)
Approved to review the conditional use permit for a landscape business
(Schlomka Landscaping, Inc.) at 2511 Carver Avenue again in two months
(June 2005). If Mr. Schlomka has not complied with the entire
engineering department's requirements by this time, the city council
should consider the revocation of the conditional use permit for a
landscape business.
Agenda Item H15
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cleric
DATE: December 6, 2005
RE: Annual Lawful Gambling License — Pioneer Booster Club
Introduction
The Pioneer Booster Club is requesting the annual renewal of their application for lawful
gambling license for Bleechers Bar located at 2220 White Bear Avenue. In order for the
State of Minnesota to issue an annual gambling license, approval of the following
resolution from the City is required.
RESOLUTION
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that
the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the Pioneer Booster Club, to
operate at Bleechers Bar located at 2220 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the
timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling
Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit
application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council
of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their
approval.
Recommendation
It is recommended that council approve the lawful gambling resolution application for the
Pioneer Booster Club.
Agenda Item H16
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer
Bill Priefer, Public Works Operations Analyst
SUBJECT: Diseased Tree Program- Report on 2005 Removals
DATE: December 2, 2005
INTRODUCTION
Dutch elm disease (DED) made a strong comeback in 2004 and remained a problem this summer in
most of the metro area including Maplewood. Trees that survived the last major outbreak in the 1970's
are now becoming victims. The following is a summary of our efforts to deal with diseased elm trees in
Maplewood.
Background
The Public Works department has expended resources on the diseased tree sanitation program since
the first infestation of DED in the 1970's. However, fewer resources have been required over the last
twenty years since our elm population was nearly depleted thirty years ago; and we have had an
effective tree sanitation program in place to protect the few hundred elms left in Maplewood. The
average annual DED mortality rate had been less than six trees per summer for the last fifteen years.
Although timely sanitation of diseased trees is crucial to an effective control program, the recent
infestation was difficult to forecast as well as combat. The unexpected high level of DED was the
culmination of many factors. Droughty falls and low snow cover winters the past few years brought
more elms into spring leaf -out in stressful conditions. The warmer winters also increased the beetle
survival. The beetles then found a vast amount of pre- stressed trees to feed on and breed in.
The City of Maplewood contracts for the services of a certified tree inspector /forester to identify and
mark diseased elm trees. The cost for these services was $8,100 in 2005. Maplewood City code
enforces a Shade Tree Disease Control program. Under City code, trees infected with DED or any
dead elm tree with bark intact, is considered a public nuisance.
A total of 264 diseased elms with a total of 4,317 diameter inches were marked for removal in 2005
compared to 203 elms totaling 3,487 diameter inches in 2004. Fifteen percent of the diseased elms, or
651 diameter inches, were on city public right of way or on park land. Our street and park maintenance
crews were able to remove the smaller trees while a private contractor removed the balance at a cost of
$6,012 compared to $10,515 in 2004. The other eighty -five percent of diseased trees marked, or 3,666
diameter inches, were removed by private land owners or other public agencies. The approximate cost
of removal for private landowners was $67,400 which is based on an average estimated removal cost
of $27.50 per diameter inch.
While inspecting for DED, the forester also marked 108 oaks for oak wilt disease, or 1,758 diameter
inches, at 25 properties. While city ordinance does not specifically address oak wilt, advice was given
to residents on disease prevention and treatment by our city forester.
Agenda Item H16
Summary
In most cases, Maplewood residents have cooperated and worked hard to do their part in controlling
the devastation caused by Dutch Elm Disease and Oak wilt. All but four of the 264 diseased elms have
been removed. Final non - compliance notices have been sent and removal will be completed before
spring leaf out when the beetles begin to be active.
Residents of the Oakridge Development have been especially proactive in treating oaks suspected of
having oak wilt. Our forester has made a special effort to work with and educate these residents.
However, more education and information is necessary. Efforts to educate all of our residents on tree
issues have been accomplished mainly through articles on the city web site. In order to further our
educational effort on diseases and other aspects of the urban forest, a series of articles are planned for
Maplewood City News starting with the January issue.
Agenda Item H17
IMI:IM[a]:L1ki Bill MI
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Ken Roberts, Planner
SUBJECT:
Tax - Exempt Revenue Financing
PROJECT:
Hill Murray School
LOCATION:
2625 Larpenteur Avenue East
DATE:
November 30, 2005
INTRODUCTION
The Hill Murray Foundation, on behalf of Hill- Murray School, is requesting that the city give
approval for up to $3.4 million in tax - exempt revenue note financing. They would use this
financing to buy the property the school sits on and to cover the costs of proposed capital
projects to the existing building. Hill Murray is a catholic school for grades 7 -12 located at 2625
Larpenteur Avenue. (See the maps on pages two through four and the letter from Mary Ippel on
pages five and six.)
The applicant is requesting that the city approve this financing so the bond interest would be
tax - exempt. The state and federal governments require local government approval of tax -
exempt financing.
DISCUSSION
This request should meet the city's requirements for tax - exempt financing. Maplewood will not
be liable for this financing. The proposed repairs and future improvements should make the
building much more usable for the students and staff.
X61�� I ��I6.9 FIT& I[a]ki I
On November 22, 2005, the Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
approved this tax - exempt financing request.
INx8101MI MI:Iki UL111111 [a]ki
Approve the attached resolution starting on page seven. This approves Maplewood giving
approval for up to $3.4 million in tax - exempt revenue financing for Hill- Murray School at 2625
Larpenteur Avenue.
p /Sec 13 -29 /Hill Murray School tax - exempt fin - 2005
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Area Address Map
3. Site Plan (Partial)
4. November8, 2005 letterfrom Mary Ippel
5. Financing Approval Resolution
Attachment 1
HOLLOWAY AVE
STATE HIGHWAY ROW
e�
w
`N ¢
C7 Y
PRIORY
7 zs ~
w? z
~
HILL-MURRAY U
H
N
Y
K
Q
Location Map
Hill - Murray l�
2 N
i dE (•
KNOLL CIR
N
HILL - MURRAY
STATE HIGHWAY ROW
i
Area Address Map a
Hill - Murray
2625 LarpEenteur Avenue N
z
J
K
W
H
N
HILL - MURRAY
STATE HIGHWAY ROW
i
Area Address Map a
Hill - Murray
2625 LarpEenteur Avenue N
Attachment 3
Ell
BRIGGS AND M ORGAN
PROFESSIONI�L 1LSSOCIXI'ION
November 8, 2005
VIA EMAIL
Mr. Ken Roberts
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109 -2702
WRI'TER'S DIRECI DIAL,
(651) 808 -6620
V RI'1 ER'S E - Dti1IL
mippcl @briggs.com
Re: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota
— Educational Facilities Revenue Note, Series 2005 (Hill Murray School
Project)
Dear Ken and Board of Commissioners:
It is proposed that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota (the "HRA ") issue a tax - exempt Note on behalf of Hill Murray Foundation (the
"Borrower ") to purchase the approximately 40 acres of land that is the current footprint of the
Hill Murray School along with an additional 4 acres of land located in the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota (the "City "). The Note to be issued by the HRA on behalf of the Borrower would not
exceed $3,400,000.
State and Federal law allow governmental entities to issue obligations such as the Note
and loan the proceeds to nonprofit corporations to finance or refinance capital expenditures.
This assistance reduces borrowing costs for nonprofit corporations and enables them to provide
their services more cost effectively.
To accomplish this purpose, the HRA would enter a Loan Agreement with the Borrower
under which the Borrower would agree to pay all principal and interest on the Note. The HRA
will assign all of its rights and obligations under the Loan Agreement to a local bank (the
"Lender ") which will purchase the Note and loan the purchase price of the Note directly to the
Borrower. The HRA is merely a conduit and the money and obligations flow only between the
Lender and the Borrower.
The HRA will be asked to designate the Note as Bank Qualified. Consequently, the HRA
will have to factor the Note into its $10,000,000 Bank Qualification allowance possibly leaving
only $6,600,000 available for other obligations that may be issued by the HRA this year for
governmental purposes or other nonprofit borrowers. However, the HRA has most likely has no
intention of issuing any other bonds this year so this should not be a concern. The HRA's ability
to designate the Note as Bank Qualified is the sole reason that the HRA, rather than the City, has
2200 FIRST NiMONi1LB NKBI_ILDING
332'AIINNESOIl STREET
Si1IN'I PiUT, 1 MINNESOIl 55101
'TELEPHONE (651) 508 -6600
.. Pi1CSIMILE !6511 808-6450
1840847v1 MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE • IDs CENTER • XXAX X.BRIGGS.COl4
MEMBER —LEN 14I5DI, A GLOBAL ASSO51A'I'IOS OF ISDEPESDEVI' LAW P -IRl4S
BRIGGS AND MORGAN
November 8, 2005
Page 2
been asked to issue the Note. The City has issued bonds this year in an amount which prevents
the City from designating the Note, and any other bonds, as Bank Qualified. The HRA, as a
separate governmental entity, has its own $10,000,000 Bank Qualification allowance and is able
to satisfy the Borrower's request that the Note be designated as Bank Qualified.
The Note and the resolution to be adopted by the HRA will recite that the Note, if and
when issued, will not to be payable from or charged upon any of the HRA's or the City's funds,
other than the revenues received under the Loan Agreement and pledged to the payment of the
Note, and neither the HRA nor the City is subject to any liability on the Note. No holder of the
Note will ever have the right to compel any exercise by the City of its taxing powers to pay any
of the principal of the Note or the interest or premium thereon, or to enforce payment of the Note
against any property of the HRA or the City except the interests of the HRA in payments to be
made by the Borrower under the Loan Agreement. The Note will not constitute a charge, lien or
encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the HRA or the City except the interests
of the HRA in payments to be made by the Borrower under the Loan Agreement. The Note is
not a moral obligation on the part of the State or its political subdivisions, including the City and
the HRA, and the Note will not constitute a debt of the City or the HRA within the meaning of
any constitutional or statutory limitation.
Issuing the Note will not affect the credit rating of the City or the HRA on bonds they
issue for municipal purposes.
Under Federal and State law in order for the Note to be a tax exempt obligation, it must
be issued by a governmental entity. This requires that the City or the HRA hold a public hearing
and approve issuance of the Note and the execution of related documents. The HRA will hold a
public hearing on November 22, 2005 and give final approval to the issuance of the Note and the
execution of related documents so it is not necessary for the City to hold a hearing.
The Borrower will pay the City's required application fee and will be required to pay the
City's administrative fee upon the issuance of the Note.
If you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
s 914ary L. Ippef
Mary L. Ippel
1840847vi
0I
Attachment 5
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
HELD: December 12, 2005
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the Maplewood City Council, Ramsey
County, Minnesota, was duly called and held at the Maplewood City Hall on Monday, the 12th day
of December, 2005, at 7:00 o'clock p.m.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
GIVING APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF A
REVENUE NOTE BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD FOR EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
WHEREAS:
1. On November 22, 2005 the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of
Maplewood (the "HRA ") adopted a Resolution giving approval to the issuance of a tax - exempt
Educational Facilities Revenue Note in a principal amount not to exceed $3,400,000 (the "Note ") to
finance the acquisition of approximately 40 acres of land which is the current site of the Hill- Murray
School campus along with an additional 4 acres of land located at 2625 Larpenteur Avenue in the
City (the "Project "). The Project will be owned by The Hill- Murray Foundation (the "Borrower ") and
leased to Hill- Murray School, both Minnesota nonprofit corporations.
2. Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, amended ( "TEFRA "), requires
that the applicable elected representatives of the governmental unit issuing the Note give approval
to issuance of the Note following holding of a public hearing. A public hearing was held bythe HRA
on November 22, 2005 with respect to the Project and issuance of the Note in an amount not to
exceed $3,400,000.
3. The Maplewood HRA has requested that the Maplewood City Council give its
consent pursuant to TEFRA to facilitate the issuance of the Note by the HRA, subject to final
approval of the details of issuance of the Note by the HRA.
7
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Maplewood City Council, that in accordance
with TEFRA, the City Council hereby consents to the issuance of the Note for the purposes
described in the aforesaid Resolution of the HRA, the exact details of which including, but not
limited to, provisions relating to the maturities, interest rates, and redemption, are to be determined
by the HRA and set forth in the Note or the Loan Agreement dated as of the date of closing
between the City and the Borrower. In addition, the City Council hereby authorizes the issuance of
any additional obligations (including refunding notes or bonds) bythe HRA, found bythe HRA to be
necessary for carrying out the purposes for which the Note is issued.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and, after full discussion thereof, and upon a vote being taken thereof, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against same:
Adopted this 12th day of December, 2005.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
1.1
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified Clerk of the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have carefully compared the attached and
foregoing extract of minutes with the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council City held on
the date therein indicated, which are on file and of record in my office, and the same is a full, true
and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a Resolution Approving the
Issuance of a Revenue Note by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota.
City Clerk
(r]
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2005
7:00 P.M. CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM A
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Fischer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II = :IQ I1Wy9I,
Commissioner Tom Connelly
Present
Commissioner Lorraine Fischer
Present
Commissioner Joe O'Brien
Present
Commissioner Gary Pearson
Absent
Commissioner Beth Ulrich
Present
Staff Present: Ken Roberts Planner
Staff Absent: Lisa Kroll Recording Secretary
(was at the CDRB meeting)
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mr. Roberts said at the request of the attorney Mary Ippel from Briggs and Morgan she requested
moving item number 7. New Business ahead of number 5. Communications due to another
meeting Ms. Ippel has to attend this evening.
Commissioner Connelly moved to approve the agenda as amended.
Commissioner O'Brien seconded. Ayes — Connelly, Fischer, O'Brien, Ulrich
The motion carried.
1TM 01 WITA _11,R] 10 *1.1
a. Tax - Exempt Financing Request — Hill Murray School (2625 Larpenteur Avenue)
Mr. Roberts said the Hill Murray Foundation, on behalf of Hill- Murray School, is requesting that
the city give approval for up to $3.5 million in tax - exempt revenue note refinancing. They would
use this financing to buy the property the school sits on and to cover the costs of proposed capital
projects to the existing building. Hill Murray is a catholic school for grades 7 -12 located at 2625
Larpenteur Avenue. The applicant is requesting that the city approve this financing so the bond
interest would be tax - exempt. The state and federal governments require local government
approval of tax - exempt financing.
Mr. Roberts said this request should meet the city's requirements for tax - exempt financing.
Maplewood will not be liable for this financing. The proposed repairs and future improvements
should make the building much more usable for the students and staff.
IM
Housing and Redevelopment Authority -2-
Minutes of 11 -22 -05
Mr. Roberts said although he did not list this is a public hearing in the report this is a public
hearing and it should be opened up to the public.
Commissioner O'Brien asked who the current owner of the land is?
Mr. Joseph Peschges, President, Hill Murray addressed the HRA. Mr. Peschges said The Sisters
of St. Paul's Monastery owned 59% of the and The Archdiocese owned 41 % of the land but The
Archdiocese gifted its 41 % of the land in order to purchase the 59% of the land from The Sisters
of St. Paul's Monastery.
Commissioner O'Brien asked what percentage the financing is at?
Ms. Jackie Lamonica, Finance Director, addressed the commission. Ms. Lamonica said the
finance rate is at 3 %.
Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgan, City Bond Counsel, 2200 First National Bank Building, 332
Minnesota Street, St. Paul, addressed the commission. Ms. Ippel said she is here to answer any
questions the commission may have.
Chairperson Fischer asked if Hill Murray is still in conversation with the many interests for the
land north of the Priory?
Mr. Peschges said yes. There are other parties interested in the land that would like to turn the
land into a bus terminal. Hill Murray would like the land turned into something else. Everybody
has a different idea of what the land should be used for.
Chairperson Fischer said since this is a public hearing is there anyone that would like to speak
regarding this proposal?
Nobody came forward to speak about the proposal.
Ms. Lamonica asked Mr. Roberts if the staff report could be altered to read approval for up to
$3.4 million rather than the $3.5 million stated in the staff report?
Mr. Roberts said yes, that correction will be made.
Commissioner O'Brien moved to approve the attached resolution starting on page seven of the
staff report. This approves Maplewood giving approval for up to $3.4 million in tax - exempt
revenue financing for Hill- Murray School at 2625 Larpenteur Avenue.
Commissioner Ulrich seconded. Ayes — Connelly, Fischer, O'Brien, Ulrich
The motion passed.
Ms.Mary Ippel said there is a resolution that needs to go to the city council on December 12,
2005.
11
AGENDA NO H -18
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
N 4W-11 �� I_1111W_11 ki 18 3:11111 :?-1 11 *1;101 3' Z 1 I 1 I: 1
DATE: December 6, 2005
INTRODUCTION
It is proposed that ambulance rates be increased effective January 1, 2006 to provide
the anticipated revenue in the 2006 Budget and to eliminate the property tax subsidy for
ambulance services.
BACKGROUND
Ambulance service revenues for 2006 are projected to be $1,593,410 which is $261,640
and 19.7% higher than the 2005 budget. Ambulance rates have been increased
annually over the past several years. Past rate increases have been based upon the
average charged by other providers. During preparation of the 2006 Budget, it was
decided to eliminate the $378,760 property tax subsidy for ambulance services. This
was recommended in 2002 by the Mercer Group when they prepared a Strategic
Business Plan for Fire and EMS Services.
The 2006 rates will be 9 % -13% higher than the rates charged by other providers in
2005. (Rates charged by other providers in the area are listed in the attached table.) In
the past the rate charged non - residents was higher than the rate charged residents
because the ambulance service had a property tax subsidy. The higher non - resident
rate will be discontinued in 2006 due to elimination of the property tax subsidy.
The proposed rate changes are as follows:
AMBU LANCE RATE INCREASES
Increase
2005
2006
Amount
Percent
Non- transport
Resident
$290.00
$335.00
$ 45.00
15.5%
Non - resident
310.00
335.00
25.00
8.1
Basic life support:
Resident
780.00
895.00
115.00
14.7
Non - resident
815.00
895.00
80.00
9.8
Advanced life support 1:
Resident
1,030.00
1,170.00
140.00
13.6
Non - resident
1,080.00
1,170.00
90.00
8.3
Advanced life support 2:
Resident
1,150.00
1,295.00
145.00
12.6
Non - resident
1,205.00
1,295.00
90.00
7.5
Charge per mile
13.00
14.10
1.10
8.5
RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of the attached resolution is recommended to set the rates for 2006.
S: \FINANCE \Word \Misc\A MBU L06. DOC 2
SURVEY OF AMBULANCE RATES
PROVIDER
BASIC
ALS1
2005 RATES
NON -
ALS2 TRANSPORT
MILEAGE
ALF Ambulance (A)
$ 699.00
$ 919.00
$1,152.00
$ 286.00
$ 14.10
Cottage Grove EMS
873.34
1,317.43
1,317.43
262.16
11.89
Hennepin County
925.00
975.00
985.00
330.00
17.00
Medical Center
Health East -St. John's
575.00
1,200.00
1,350.00
0
12.75
Health East -St. Joseph's
859.00
1,053.00
1,239.80
415.00
16.50
Lakeview Hospital
1,187.00
1,187.00
1,503.50
448.50
12.75
Oakdale, City of
800.00
1,000.00
1,200.00
75.00
0.00
White Bear Lake
325.00
565.00
625.00
115.00
9.00
Woodbury
1,133.50
1,133.50
1,353.50
275.00
13.75
Average
$ 819.65
$1,038.88
$1,191.80
$ 275.83
$ 11.97
Maplewood:
Resident
$ 780.00
$1,030.00
$1,150.00
$ 290.00
$ 13.00
Non - Resident
815.00
1,080.00
1,205.00
310.00
13.00
(A) Serves Apple Valley, Lakeville, and Farmington
S: \FINANCE \Word \Misc\A MBU L06. DOC 3
RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2006 AMBULANCE RATES
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is authorized to impose reasonable charges for
emergency and paramedic ambulance services by Minnesota Statutes 471.476 and by special
laws (Chapter 426, Laws of 1975, and Chapter 743, Laws of 1978); and
WHEREAS, it is fair and reasonable to charge for services rendered based upon the
distance a person is transported and by type of services provided; i.e., basic or advanced life
support services as defined by Medicare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following charges shall be effective
January 1, 2006:
Base rates
Non - transport (treatment administered) $ 335.00
Basic life support ambulance services $ 895.00
Advanced life support ambulance services 1 $1,170.00
Advanced life support ambulance services 2 $1,295.00
Rate per mile transported $ 14.10
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be no charge when the patient has not
been administered treatment and is not transported, when the patient is transported to the
detoxification center, or when the patient is transported in a squad car.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that if more than one person is transported, the
ambulance charges will be pro -rated between the people transported.
S: \FINANCE \Word \Misc\A MBU L06. DOC 4
Agenda Item H19
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bruce K. Anderson. Director of Parks and Recreation
FROM: Ann Hutchinson, Lead Naturalist
DATE: December 6, 2005 for the December 12 City Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Budget Adjustment for Nature Center Donation
Maplewood Nature Center and Preserves received $1,220 in donations from multiple parties toward
the Blue Heron bronze sculpture from our Butterfly Garden fundraiser last summer. Please request
that the city council credit this to our account 101 - 604 - 000 -4165. This $1,220 will cover the cost of
fabrication.
Sculpture artist Lynnette Powers has also donated $2,400 worth of time and labor in creating the
sculpture.
Msculpture donation.nature center
Agenda Item 11
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Pubic Works Director /City Engineer
Erin Laberee, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Kenwood Area Street Improvements, Project 06 -16
a. Public Hearing 7:00 pm
b. Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 votes)
DATE: December 2, 2005
IL kI :IQ 111L911IQL1I
The public hearing for this project has been scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Monday, December 12, 2005. Notices
of the public hearing have been mailed and published. The feasibility study has been provided as a
supplement to the council packet. The study includes information on the proposed improvement, proposed
financing and probable assessments. The city council should consider ordering the improvement following
the public hearing.
Background
The city council ordered the preparation of this feasibility study at the June 13th, 2005, regular meeting. On
November 28` 2005 the city council accepted the feasibility report and ordered the public hearing.
Street improvements for this neighborhood have been listed in the city's capital improvements project plan
for the past five years. The project involves the complete reconstruction of approximately 4 miles of
residential streets. Drainage improvements, sanitary improvements and water main repairs are also part of
the project. Proposed financing sources for the project are through the sanitary utility fund, water fund,
Saint Paul Regional Water Services obligation, city general tax levy and street and storm sewer
assessments. There are 322 assessable parcels within the project area.
A total of 4 neighborhood meetings were held. The first series of meetings took place on September 22"'
and 29` to introduce residents to the project and answer general questions. Approximately 90 residents
signed in for the September meetings. The second set of meetings was held on November 15` and
November 16` to provide the residents with more specific information regarding street width and storm
sewer improvements. Again around 90 residents attended. In general, a high majority of the residents in
attendance seemed interested and supportive of the project. The biggest concern was expressed from
several residents regarding the proposed street width in the Maplecrest Area. A questionnaire was sent
out in November polling street width preferences and the majority of residents are in favor of maintaining a
street width of 36 feet instead of narrowing the streets to 32 feet wide, as proposed by engineering staff.
Based upon the resident preference, it is recommended that the street widths remain at 36 feet wide in the
Maplecrest Streets.
The proposed project schedule anticipates construction beginning in early May 2006 and completion of the
project in October or November of 2006. This is the largest reconstruction program proposed for our
neighborhood streets, but should be constructed in one season.
Budget Impact
The resolution calls for establishing a project budget of $4,727,140. The capital improvement plan for 2006-
2010 estimated a total project cost of $4,050,000. Both financing plans are detailed below.
Proposed Financing Sources CIP Financing Sources
General Tax Levy
$
2,252,447.00
General Tax Levy
$ 2,005,400.00
Assessments
$
1,575,458.00
Assessments
$ 1,475,500.00
Sewer Fund
$
443,245.00
Sewer Fund
$ 202,500.00
SPRWS
$
72,490.00
SPRWS
$ 133,100.00
WAC
$
80,000.00
WAC
$ 30,000.00
EUF
$
303,500.00
EUF
$ 203,500.00
TOTAL
$
4,727,140.00
TOTAL
$ 4,050,000.00
The proposed budget is approximately $675,000 greater than the CIP estimate in part due to the extensive
storm sewer improvements, especially around Oehrleins Lake. This area of the community does not have
a fully developed storm drainage system, and the impact of improving drainage needs to be mitigated when
flows exit from Oehrleins Lake. Pre - treatment of storm flows is required to maintain area lake water quality
and it is most cost - effective to construct the improvements when the streets are reconstructed. The
impact, however, is on the overall project cost.
The total project is $677,140 (16.7 %) greater than originally estimated in the Capital Improvements Plan.
An understanding of the staff estimating process helps to quantify this amount. Of this amount, a 10%
contingency is provided for costs as part of this project. Additionally, 31.5% of the construction cost is
provided for indirect costs for design, engineering, surveying, fiscal and legal costs. In the past 2 -3 years,
staff estimates have proved to be conservative and bids have been 12 -15% less than the staff estimate.
Given these factors, staff feels comfortable that the project can proceed to construction and overall savings
are reasonably possible to bring the budget down to the CIP level once bids are received.
Following is a summary of the budget impacts if the total project is approved at the higher estimate level
and no cost savings are realized:
• General tax levy ($247,047 increase) portion would be financed by bonds that would be paid
off with a 20 -year debt service tax levy that would average $179,146 for the $2,252,447
amount. The $179,146 tax levy represents a 1.3% increase above the tax levy in the proposed
2006 budget. All but $19,649 of the annual tax levy has been included in the projected tax
levies in the CIP for the next five years.
• Assessments ($99,958 increase) have no direct impact to city financing. Property owners pay
this based upon benefits received and have up to 15 years to pay this amount.
• Sanitary Sewer Fund ($240,745 increase) has a reserve fund for replacements. The 2006
budget did not propose a rate increase for sewer. An analysis of the Sewer Fund and this
additional expense will be conducted as part of the 2007 budget process and rate increases
will be considered at that time.
• Water Availability Charge ($50,000 increase) portion will be financed by the 2% water
surcharge that will begin in 2006 for all residents receiving water from the St. Paul Regional
Water Services ( SPRWS). Adequate funds are available for this increase.
• Environmental Utility Fund ($100,000 increase) has a reserve fund for replacements and
improvements. An analysis as part of the 2007 budget process will determine if a rate increase
will be needed.
DISCUSSION /ISSUES
It is recommended that the entire project area be approved as part of the street reconstruction project.
Many of the streets are in very poor condition and in need of complete reconstruction, although a couple of
streets are in a better condition than others, a neighborhood approach is recommended to minimize cost
and neighborhood disruption. Generally storm sewer is inadequate throughout the neighborhood and the
project proposes extensive storm sewer improvements.
If the council deems it necessary to reduce the total cost of the project, Payne Avenue and Viking Drive
north of County Road B, would be the first streets recommended for elimination as they could easily be
removed from the project boundaries. The elimination of Payne Avenue and Viking Drive would reduce the
total proposed budget by $600,000.
If further reduction is necessary, the Maplecrest Streets (north of Skillman and south of County Road B)
could be eliminated in lieu of Payne Avenue and Viking Drive. These streets have existing curb and were
overlayed in 1984. The disadvantage to this scenario is a storm sewer main line is proposed through these
streets that the entire project area is dependent on. The elimination of the Maplecrest Streets would
reduce the proposed project budget by $1.3 million.
The City staff recommends continuation of this successful program. This program has three goals that are
part of the annual improvement plan as follows:
• Goals:
Reconstruct badly deteriorated streets, (approx. 4 Miles of local streets)
Maintain neighborhood infrastructure. (the city has $65 million in infrastructure that needs to
be maintain to avoid losing value; The city is proposing to pay 66% of this project)
Treat property consistently through assessments. (everyone pays at some time)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the improvement of the
Kenwood Area Street Improvements, City Project 05 -16. (Four affirmative votes are required to approve
this resolution).
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Location Map
3. Feasibility Study
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 12th day of December, 2005, fixed a date
for a council hearing on the proposed street improvements for the Kenwood Area Street Improvements,
City Project 05 -16.
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given,
and the hearing was duly held on December 12, 2005, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be
heard on the matter and has fully considered the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the
City of Maplewood make improvements to Kenwood Area Street Improvements, City Project 05 -16.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the 12th
day of December 2005.
3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to
prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement.
4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to
implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of $4,727,140 shall be established. The
proposed financing plan is as follows:
Street assessments:
Storm assessments:
Sanitary Sewer utility Fund:
SPRWS Obligation:
WAC Fund
Environmental Utility Fund
City general tax levy:
Total
$ 1,356,608
(29 %)
$ 218,850
(5 %)
$ 443,245
(9 %)
$ 72,490
(2 %)
$ 80,000
(2 %)
$ 303,500
(6 %)
$ 2,252,447
(47 %)
$ 4,727,140
(100 %)
E6
' VIKING DR. cn Keller
ry C/) w w La ke
O J w Q 0 Q
J w O U C
w z [ LAURIE CT. Q
cn rZ III
EL� BURKE CT,
BURK Moplecrest
AVE. Park
ELDRIDGE AVE.
cn
0 Lake e BELMONT
cn AVE. / SKILLMAN AV.
z
KEN OOD
J LN.
o w
Q
M o Cn m O
rY
w w z 6�
Edgerton w w Y
Park < J 0
(D
ROSELAWN AV. q�
BELLWOOD a-
0
SUMMER o
CT. w . 3:
cn �-- z z
� U Y w z
z J w
Q Y
� cn TRAIL
RI LP EY AV. GATEW Y
PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT NO SCALE
Exhibit 1: Project Location
Kenwood Area Street Improvements
City Project 05 -16
FEASIBILITY REPORT
KENWOOD AREA STREETS
PROJECT 05 -16
PAYNE AVENUE, LEE STREET, GREENBRIER STREET, KENWOOD DRIVE WEST, ALLEN
PLACE, KENWOOD DRIVE EAST, SEARLE STREET, BELLWOOD AVENUE, SKILLMAN
AVENUE, BELMONT LANE, ELDRIDGE AVENUE, BURKE AVENUE, VIKING DRIVE, VERNON
AVENUE, KENWOOD LANE
1 hereby certify that this report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I
am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Signature:
Erin Laberee, P.E.
Date: 'A- C- D - os
License No. 43464
City of Maplewood
Department of Public Works
1902 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
k 4 11111l
Certification .........
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................
............................... 1
Streets..............................................................................................................
............................... 2
Proposed Improvements... ........................... ........... -- ...... ................ -- ... .....
....... ......... .......... 3
StreetDesign ...................................................................................................
............................... 3
Storm Water Management ..............................................................................
............................... 5
WaterMain .......................................................................................................
............................... 6
SanitarySewer. . .......... ...... ...... - ............ .......... ......... .......... .............
--- ........... - .... --- 6
Miscellaneous Private Utilities .........................................................................
............................... 7
ErosionControl ................................................................................................
............................... 7
TrafficControl ...................................................................................................
............................... 7
ProjectCost ............. -- .... - .... ........ - .... - ............ ............. ............. — .... ..........
...................... 7
CostRecovery ..................................................................................................
............................... 8
ProjectSchedule ..............................................................................................
............................... 9
Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................. ...............................
10
EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1: Project Location
Exhibit 2: Proposed Project Streets
Exhibit 3: Maplecrest Streets Only
Exhibit 4: Existing and Proposed Street Section
Exhibit 5: Proposed Drainage Improvements
Exhibit 6: Proposed Watermain Replacement
Exhibit 7: Proposed Cost Estimate
Exhibit 8: Proposed Assessment Roll (Preliminary)
Exhibit 9: Street Assessment Only Map
Exhibit 10: Storm Assessment Only Map
Exhibit 11: Street & Storm Assessment Map
ii
FEASIBILITY REPORT
KENWOOD AREA STREETS
PROJECT OS -16
PAYNE AVENUE, LEE STREET, GREENBRIER STREET, KENWOOD DRIVE WEST, ALLEN
PLACE, KENWOOD DRIVE EAST, SEARLE STREET, BELLWOOD AVENUE, SKILLMAN
AVENUE, BELMONT LANE, ELDRIDGE AVENUE, BURKE AVENUE, VIKING DRIVE, VERNON
AVENUE, KENWOOD LANE
INTRODUCTION
History
The above referenced streets are referred to in this report as the Kenwood Area
Streets. As shown on .Exhibit 9 the project area is generally bounded by Highway 36 to
the north, the Gateway Trail to the south, Arcade Street to the east and Edgerton Street
to the west.
The Kenwood neighborhood as defined in this study is comprised of some very old
plats. Parkside was platted in 1932 and encompasses the southern portion of the
Kenwood Area Street Improvements. Little's Third Edition was platted in 1957 and is
located in the central area of improvements. The Kortus Addition plat, an area
bordering Roselawn Avenue, Payne Avenue, and Edgerton Street was platted in 1977.
Lastly, the Pedro Addition bordered by Hwy 36 to the north was platted in 1994. A
record of the Maplecrest plat could not produced but it is presumed to have been
platted in the mid 1960's because this is when the utilities were installed.
Most of the streets in this neighborhood generally were not constructed to any design
standards; rather they merely evolved over time to meet the city's demand for better
streets. Once the watermain and sanitary sewer construction was complete the streets
were probably graded and rolled smooth. Later a thin layer of bituminous was most
likely placed on the streets that are now the existing street section.
The streets comprising the Maplecrest plat are the exception as they were constructed
with concrete curb and gutter. Belmont Lane, Eldridge Avenue, Burke Avenue,
Greenbrier Street N, and Kenwood Drive E, north of Skillman Avenue and South of
County Road B were constructed in 1965 and overlayed 1984. See Exhibit 3.
There is minimal storm sewer within the project area. The existing storm sewer is
inadequate and does not extend far enough into the neighborhood to successfully
manage the storm water. During a site visit in the summer of 2005 it was apparent that
there were many areas of standing water in the streets due to flat grades. It was also
noted that storm water crosses the street from side to side due to a lack of crown on the
street section.
In 1965 when the Maplecrest development was constructed, an outlet for Oehrline Lake
was built to carry overflow east into Keller Lake.
Neighborhood Meetings
The feasibility report for this project was ordered at the June 13 2005 city council
meeting. A total of 4 neighborhood meetings were held. The first series of meetings
took place on September 22 and 29 to introduce residents to the project and answer
general questions. Approximately 90 residents signed in for the September meetings. In
general, most residents seemed interested in the project and did not express negative
opinions. The second set of neighborhood meetings were held on November 15 and
November 16 to provide residents with more specific information regarding street
width and storm sewer improvements. Again around 90 residents attended and the
general attitude was upbeat. A few concerns were expressed from several residents
regarding the proposed street width in the Maplecrest Area. A questionnaire was sent
out in November polling street width preferences and is addressed in the next section of
the report.
STREETS
General
The existing streets in this neighborhood present an ongoing maintenance problem for
the City of Maplewood Maintenance Department. Of the three infrastructure elements
the City maintains (sanitary sewer, storm sewer and streets), the bulk of the
maintenance activities consist of patching the roadway and filling potholes.
All of the streets included in this project are local streets and serve only local
neighborhood traffic. Garbage trucks and school buses are generally the heaviest
vehicles that use the streets.
Existing Conditions
Presently, the conditions of the streets within the scope of this project range from very
poor to poor. Potholes and patches are abundant on most of the streets. Longitudinal
and lateral cracks are also apparent on a majority of the streets. Inadequate crown
allows water to pond and traverse the street section, further deteriorating the roadway.
The freeze and thaw cycles that happen every spring, combined with the old age and
poor design of the streets, are responsible for the declining roadway conditions.
The streets within the Maplecrest area were overlayed 21 years ago in 1984 as they
were constructed in 1965 and in need of repair. Transverse cracking is apparent in the
overlayed pavement and sections of the concrete curb are cracked.
The existing street widths vary from street to street. A summary of the existing street
widths are provided in the next section.
2
To determine the existing pavement thickness and subgrade soil type, 34 soil borings
were taken within the project area. The thickness of the pavement ranged from 6 to 12
inches (bituminous thickness ranged from 1 to 5 inches, while the aggregate base
thickness ranged from approximately 2 to 10 inches. Soil types vary somewhat
throughout the project area. Beneath the existing pavements, the general soil profile
encountered was scattered but prominent deposits of existing fill over native soils
comprised mostly of glacial outwash and till, but also included lacustrine and swamp
deposits. The existing fill generally consisted of silty sand (SM), clayey sand (SC), and
poorly graded sand with silt (SP -SM), all of which should provide an adequate subgrade
base. Two of the borings found silt (ML) therefore subgrade soil in these areas may
need to be removed and replaced.
The streets within the proposed project area have deteriorated past the point where
reactionary maintenance is no longer effective. Crack sealing, sea] coating and
overlaying are no longer cost effective solutions to maintain these streets. The
Maplecrest streets look to be in fair condition but the pavement beneath the overlay is
in very poor condition. The overlay was a quick fix to improve the street condition. Now
the overlay is beginning to deteriorate. To be cost effective it is recommended that
these streets be reconstructed as part of this improvement project.
Most of the streets in this area will be reclaimed where pavement thickness and
subgrade soils are adequate for this process. Reclaiming the streets is a material
recycling process where the existing pavement surface, aggregate base and sandy
subgrade soils are pulverized and mixed to form a new aggregate base material. This
new homogeneous material is salvaged and reused. This process, where applicable,
reflects a financial savings to the project since less material must be hauled from and to
the site.
STREET DESIGN
The proposed street design will utilize a B618 barrier curb and gutter on the streets
currently without curb. Exhibit 4 shows the existing and proposed street section for
these streets. This type of curb will be used throughout the project in conjunction with
conventional storm sewer. Concrete curb will provide delineation between the street
and the boulevard. There are a number of long -term advantages to constructing
concrete curb and gutter. The roadway edges are strengthened and reinforced by the
concrete curb. Horizontal alignment and vertical elevations for the street are fixed
during paving. Future pavement management operations are simplified, less expensive
and less disruptive by having a concrete curb constructed with this project.
The Maplecrest streets currently have a drive over S -style curb. The existing curb is in
fairly good condition. There are isolated sections of curb with cracks or areas of
upheaval due to freeze /thaw conditions. These areas of curb should be replaced while
the curb in good condition should remain.
For the most part, street widths will remain relatively unchanged with a few exceptions.
Average existing street widths and proposed street widths for each of the streets within
the project area are tabulated below.
Street
Average Existing
Street Width
(feet)
proposed Width
(feet)
Allen PI
28.8
28
Bellwood Av E
32
32
Bellwood Av W
25.2
26
Belmont Ln (E of Kenwood Dr E)
30.5
32
Belmont Ln (W of Kenwood Dr E)
35.8
36
Burke Av
35.5
36
Eldridge Av
35.9
36
Greenbrier St (N of Skillman)
36
36
Greenbrier St (S of Skillman)
24.2
28
Kenwood Dr E (N of Skillman)
30.4
32
Kenwood Dr E
24.2
26
Kenwood Dr E (S of Roselawn)
25
26
Kenwood Dr W (N of Roselawn)
23.6
24
Kenwood Dr W (S of Roselawn)
25
26
Kenwood Lane
30
30
Lee St
25.9
26
Payne Av (off of Roselawn)
28.8
30
Payne Av (N of CORD B E)
30.9
30
Skillman Av
21.7
22
Searle St
20.1
24
Vernon Av
17.2
22
Viking Dr
28.3
30
4
During the neighborhood meetings staff recommended that the Maplecrest streets that
are 36' wide be narrowed to 32 feet to reflect current City standard design, Staff
recommends new streets be constructed even narrower. Many residents opposed
narrowing the streets and preferred the streets remain 36 feet wide. A questionnaire
was sent out in November to the Maplecrest residents polling their preference for a
street width of 32 feet versus 36 feet. 38 residents voted in favor of 36 foot wide streets
while only 8 were in favor of 32 foot wide streets. Based on the findings of the
questionnaire, it is recommended the streets in the Maplecrest area remain 36 feet
wide.
Based on the city's current street design standards, streets narrower than 32 feet would
have parking restrictions. However, these narrower street widths have existed for years
without parking restrictions. Thus it is not recommended that parking restrictions be
applied to the proposed streets.
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
As mentioned earlier, there is very little existing storm sewer in the project area. Exhibit
5 shows the location of the existing and proposed storm sewer. There are a number of
issues with the existing system:
• Outlet to Keller Lake— A wetland is proposed to create an area that would act
as a storm water quality basin and also act to bridge the outfall structures from
the improvements with Keller Lake in an aesthetic manner. Ramsey Washington
Metro Watershed District has agreed to pay for the wetland construction not to
include piping improvements.
There is a lack of storm water facilities on the most of the streets - As part
of the proposed storm sewer improvements, storm runoff from Payne Avenue,
Lee Street, and the southern portion of Greenbrier Street would be taken to
Oehrline Lake via new drainage facilities and subsequently transported to the
proposed wetland via the existing storm drain system. The limited pipe capacity
running from Oehrline Lake to Keller Lake creates the need to construct a new
drainage pipe in parallel with the existing. This new pipe would transport
drainage directly to the proposed wetland from five streets, while some streets
will connect to the existing capacity in the drain pipe between Oehrline and Keller
Lakes. Lastly, the southern portion of the project will mitigate drainage impacts
by transporting drainage to the park area to the south via drain pipe instead of
overland within the streets.
• The existing outlet structure and pipe condition unknown- Oehrline Lake is
scheduled to be drained approximately four feet (4) in order to televise and
better understand the current pipe condition. All existing pipe being considered
for use in the new design will be televised.
• Enhance existing wetland at Payne Avenue— It is proposed that the existing
wetland be enhanced at the NW corner of Roselawn and Payne Avenues. The
proposed enhancements would be designed to meet NURP treatment
requirements as additional runoff from the street would be directed into the
wetland.
Oehrline Lake and the proposed wetland (RWMWD) are proposed to treat runoff from
the project area. There is very little existing storm sewer throughout most of the project
area. It is proposed to construct storm sewer throughout much of the neighborhood to
direct runoff to these locations. For additional storm water treatment and to reduce the
amount of mowed turf, an infiltration pond is proposed at the NW corner of Roselawn
and Payne Avenues.
Storm runoff from the streets between Roselawn Avenue and Gateway Trail flows down
towards the park through the streets. It is proposed to capture the storm runoff and pipe
the flow to the park area to mitigate runoff flows and standing waters in the streets.
As with other projects, the option of individual rainwater gardens will be offered to
residents to help treat storm water from their roofs and yards.
WATERMAIN
At this time Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) has identified watermain
replacements along Viking Dr (430 LF), Payne Av (1085 LF), Eldridge Av (970 LF),
Vernon Av (332 LF), Greenbrier St N (700 LF), and Allen Place (405 LF). See Exhibit
6. As a matter of maintenance the SPRWS would propose to replace any substandard
hydrants, valves, services, etc., where necessary. This work would be done by the
water utility personnel prior to the street construction, and at no cost to the city.
Maplewood will only be responsible for water system expenses that are directly the
result of the street construction.
SANITARY SEWER
No major improvements are proposed for the existing sanitary sewer system. However,
city sewer maintenance records have been reviewed and various spot repairs of the
sewer system have been identified for improvements. During the design phase
questionnaires will be sent out to residents to determine if there are any potential
sanitary sewer main and service problems within the right -of -way and under the
proposed street. Any damaged sanitary sewer main and services under the roadway
will be repaired prior to the street reconstruction. This work would be performed as part
of the overall project with repairs being paid by the sewer utility fund.
MISCELLANEOUS PRIVATE UTILITIES
Staff sent out a letter to contact the private utility company regarding this project.
Underground natural gas lines exist throughout the project area. Xcel Energy -Gas may
want to replace or relocate their existing gas mains. Coordination with Xcel's designers
reduces potential conflicts with the proposed street design.
In almost all areas of the project, the remaining utilities, such as cable, electric and
telephone are found overhead. As such, no significant revisions are anticipated at this
time.
EROSION CONTROL
Erosion and sediment control methods will be implemented throughout the project. Silt
fence, bale checks, and other erosion protection methods will be utilized where direct
runoff might occur. Inlet protection will be used to protect both the existing and new
catch basins during construction. Street sweeping will occur, as needed, on all paved
street surfaces throughout the project, including intersecting streets. Watering of
exposed soils and aggregate material would be done as a dust - control measure.
TRAFFIC CONTROL
Traffic from outside the neighborhood should not be impacted by construction as the
streets in the Kenwood neighborhood serve local neighborhood traffic only. However, a
construction project of this magnitude will result in some inconvenience and disruption
to the neighborhood and its residents. Traffic will not be disrupted along Arcade Street
or County Road B during storm drainage installation because pipes will be installed by
jack and bore under the roads.
Emergency access for vehicles will be available 24 -hours a day throughout the project.
During short periods of time, however, some segments of the project may not be
passable while certain work is being executed. In these instances, access would be
available from another direction. Streets would always be reopened at the end of the
day. An alternate route for the fire trucks will be determined for short periods of time
when access may be blocked due to construction.
Residents with concrete curb work, or concrete driveway apron replacements, will not
be able to use their driveways during the week the concrete is curing. During that time,
Maplewood police will be notified of the arrangement in order to add patrols while
residents are required to park on the streets.
PROJECT COST
The estimated project cost is outlined below.
Estimated Project Costs: $4,727,140.
The estimated costs for the proposed project are outlined below. The estimated costs
include 5% contingencies and 31.5°% overhead, which include engineering,
administrative, legal, and fiscal expenses. Exhibit 7 provides a more detailed
construction and project cost estimate.
Estimated Project Cost Summary
Street Improvements:
Drainage Improvements:
Sanitary Sewer Improvements:
Water System Improvements:
$3,185,587 (67 %)
$976,426 (21%)
$343,244 (7 %)
$221,882 (5 %)
Total estimate project costs:
COST RECOVERY
$4,727,140 (100 %)
Based on the City of Maplewood's Pavement Management Policy, a portion of the
project cost is assessed on an equal "unit" basis. The "unit" would be based on an
average residential lot, as has been used in the past. There are 322 assessable parcels
within the project area. Exhibit 8 details the preliminary assessment roll. Exhibit 9, 10,
and 11 show the properties proposed to be assessed for street only, storm only, and
both street and storm improvements respectively.
The city's 1999 pavement management policy identifies certain improvement options
with established assessment rates for each of those onions. The 2005 assessment
rates were approved by the city council on October 25 h of 2004. Therefore, the
following assessment 2005 rates would apply.
• $4,380 /unit for street reconstruction with curbing.
• $87.60 /Ft for street reconstruction on multi - family or commercial properties.
$680 /unit for drainage improvements.
• $13.60/Ft for drainage improvements to multi - family or commercial properties.
• $1,330 /unit for new water service installations.
• $2,000 /unit for new sewer service installations.
Estimated Project Cost Recovery:
Street assessments:
Storm assessments:
Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund:
SPRWS Obligation:
WAG Fund:
Environment Utility Fund:
$ 1,356,608
(29 %)
$ 218,850
(5 %)
$ 443,245
(9 %)
$ 72,490
(2 %)
$ 80,000
(2 %)
$ 303,500
(6 %)
City general tax levy: $ 2,252,447 47%
Total $ 4,727,140 (100 %)
PROJECT SCHEDULE
The following schedule may be implemented, should it be determined to proceed with
the project:
Receive feasibility study and order public hearing
Public hearing
Authorize preparation of plans and specs
Approve plans and specs /authorize advertisement for bids
Bid date
Assessment hearing
Accept bids /award contract
Begin construction
Complete construction
Assessments certified to Ramsey County
11/28/05
12/12/04
12/12/04
03/13/05
04/15/05
04/24/05
04/24/05
05/01/05
10/31/05
10/09/05
0
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
From the results of the feasibility study and investigations, it can be concluded that:
1. The project is feasible as it relates to general engineering principles, practices and
construction procedures as it has been presented in this report.
1 The project is necessary for economic and safety reasons and is cost effective when
all the related costs are considered — environmental, private and public.
3. The proposed improvement is necessary to maintain the city's infrastructure.
4. The total cost estimate for the project is $4,727,140.
5. The total share proposed to be assessed to the benefited properties is $1,575,458.
6. The total city share of these costs is proposed to be $2,252,447.
7. Sewer, water, and the environmental utility fund will contribute $826,745 to the
project.
In consideration of the above conclusions, it is recommended that
1. If the city council deems the project feasible, a public hearing should be held as
soon as possible.
2. The proposed improvements should be constructed as outlined in this report.
3. The cost of the improvements will be recovered through assessments to the
benefited and through city contributions.
10
�140> 5& I Co. RD, B2
111 <@> V)
K/A) DR..
VIKING DR.
AVE. L j 0 w
> 0
I MER D LJ < 0 <
-J LIJ 00 0
LAURIE CT. 0 �
<
1�2 F IJ >- z <
V) LJJ
F--:
Co BURK
AVE.
ID RIDG 0 i AV 1 E. ELDRIDGE
R E
)NT LN. g) Oehrlin'e BELMONT
_Z1 1 Lake
SKILLMAN AV.
.MAN AVE_ ( �;/
L KEN�
UJI 0 '4j LN.
J Of
n LJJ
P F < UJ y i�
3� 1 i a_ 0 F- Q
Yi -- L-- M 0 V) M
U]J LLJ UJ
< VERNON E, Edgerton z
as LLJ u
I oo�
elown A\ I
Park /S Li
Park -J U
SELAWN AVE.
o, AVE. KELLWOOD ,
0 7-F
FV-) 0
MER 0
LLJ
LN.
LU L Z
T3 -J
C' C �
RIFLEY'
0 _J
o
C/5 fAY
AVE. TpA
r AVE.
< - 0 1 1 .
< Uj 07
CD M tf
KINGSTONZAVE.
P R =1C E
¢�i'i� AVE. @) Cz,
no scale
BU CT.
Moplecrest
Park
KC9
rj
Keller
Lake
Round
,Lake)[)
Project location
Exhibit 1
Project Location
Kenwood Area Streets Improvement 05-16
58 � � �apaor»,
140 I CO. RD. B2 �t Lake,
-. _ wti 1
111 111
]R AVE. o > o 0 6a \ `, Lake
F VIKING DR. Keller
IE RD. Q o -
z LAURIE CT. < !`.
uqll Q�' U �
BtiRKE CT.
r t
f ',rrr
BURK
Maplecrest
AVE. Pork
D L RIDGE m AV �E. /\ EL RIDGE
AVE.
—__ `�
)NT LN. _ 58 0ehrlin'e BELMONT
L
v I Lake
AVE. "I'; ;f SKILLMAN AV. "
KENV OOD
0 c LN.
z
M
4 VERNON AVE. Ed erton w z w Q�
w
R Park n pork Q W \
Park
3ELAWN AVE. 27'
o AVE. BELLWOOD a 41 ��
o C/) 0 62
w SCT.
UMMER 00 ° o
LN. o I w z
— ��� z z0 Y a ° w 113
RIPL EY r o �
AVE.
tl) b
Q Y
�� Y
w A cn GATE� Y �\
of RIPLEY AVE.
Li
0 m� CO) KING tir ti Round
w L— ACS o� Lake,
PRICE j zAVE.
w
�I AVE.
no scale Exhibit 2
Project Streets
Kenwood Area Streets Improvement 05 -16
1 ao 58
�AY D R `
AVE.
Q' J
J IE RD. a r�
z���
(,
a U
D RIDGE mliAV E.
)NT LN. J� MAN _j C_ j LA
WTI o
Of
Z
—� m U
a VERNON AVE. w
Roselawn Edgerton
Park Park
SELAWN L A VE.
) o F AVE. -
p V~i --
SUMMER
w
1 LN. a CT. w
Co
RIPL m z
V) r,. _ A pLE
� o!
111
i
�
� w
AVE.
'
no scale
CO. RD. 132
111
111
vii
VIKING
DR.
U) Lu
Q�°_
Li
w �
¢ z
� LAURIE
CT.
a
\,I I
25
Oehrline
/ Lake`
w ) LN.
w,
r w
LLJ
z o
i
BELLWOOD a i 4 ,1
° o
c
J o il
Z oz
LIJ a w
Y 3 Q Y
GAT
M
rF
BURKE CT.
Moplecrest/
Park
ELDRIDGE ``� AVE.
In BELMONT I I
A i
SKILLMAN AV.
�_ KENY OOD
KINGSTONaAVE. hid\
PRICE! zAVE.
d 30
!/��ound
" 1
Eel
11
Exhibit 3
Maplecrest Streets Only
Kenwood Area Streets Improvement 05 -16
Keller `
Lake
r
Existing Street Section
R/W
CA
EXAMPLE OF -
STANDING WATER
ON STREET
CROW I CROWN VARIES
E3II:METINy
Proposed Street Section
G
1 2% -
R/W
618 C & G I �qk
1 -1/2" TYPE 41A WEARING COURSE
BITUMINOUS TACK COAT
2 TYPE 326 BASE COURSE (31 BBB50000Y)
8" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE (RECLAIMED/RECYCLED & IMPORTED)
24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW SUBCUT
no scale
Exhibit 4
Existing and Proposed Street Section
Kenwood Area Streets Improvement 05 -16
0
•
EkSTING STORM SEWER Exhibit 5
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
no scale -PROPOSED WATERMAIN REPILACEMENT(SPRWS) Exhibit 6
M�Hmm
I
MITIMETTI�
P.I Cap Ea4i�
Shia
two
QTT
0
WVW
VIS
low
�11
�zooz'l
1i jo
l
Un'- LX'lol;7E_'I r E%o
o",
71T
AWA —1— 1 is i Oc"W".0o.-
Zx
xp'
row
Moo,
TrIv
l-IMC Ep 4l 4f,
-- o
vool�o
ln� o
�o
xn
oa
Co
vim
Q� N
2
."o so
n7
"n
Uo
N
ion
A
C
in
E -
—o"n
RU R C. � szoti,I
n. o'
N C
W. An n5£ -rte.: 2-vNW
r#
'1�
m V.
l � "n NoDo-E o U'Cl
n
oz
so�
ool o
n I Uo 11 :-
_o C
ol l�
omo
s.oL�
1.nl'
C
A
CIUCe se
E
1.1 �Ei '"pon _M4 �000l p'v o�o v soo rl' - n U
1
No'
oCeM,-o, Il'. 1F " ,AA IC
�U,sz
-E .4 ,, 1--n.
wo
o—on
loop-
�0_ -A-1-11 IllNN —hop mo
o l
Iny �•o Ft. U'
n
M, m
P w "o
aAR2
6 uQn E - —E W CU." 1 n 1 —1
�o s
N:ml
IT 111 - I � so" o4 o— v
A
11 _11mN� Is
K
e4
No
------
-----------
- EWI�U� E�.U.o oUu4
1 14 Aj�l ',� U, _'�;N ... w..& E�'
125 1N
Mapiomo NIN PM
K,n.x,d Aw t5u,�.t
I �, fP"lli Fe w,M Area SA,,, Es
p'q.WI
P"+: oi vuy A'lMVVll,'! Will
KorA,Y)Tl Awa O9,Yr
Parcel ID
-- ..................
Owner Name 1
Owner Name B
.... .........................
---- -- owner Street Addreas
.......... . .. -- -------
�rCftMtqtotTip
.. . ...................
Street a
---' -
Storm $
1724221 O fi
JAMES L HRIPISFAU!
CAR01 YN -1 OHI NiA l' Al 1
729 'ff'I MONI 1, N F
5T PAUL AIR IISi 1 7-22(*
4510
ISO
jAMFV F WATSON
5a { 't- ;x14+3
4510
0
17111 Iciom
DANWI I; MON50N
LYNN K MUNDON
73,1 BELAYONTLIT! F
LEOOD MN55 I I 1�2,113
MAPW
45VI
750
177" "'21'37£ o'h
HRIANJJ MC HON
MA
...................
NANCY K MCMAHOU ...........
I 3A 1 1
......... LULINoN I LN L ---------
- -------
- -
ST IAth AID rf4! 17 72114
----- - -- - ---------------
A510
PSI
1 WIC"I
JOHN CURRAN
NANCY T (RINNIAR
Ai{ ]Iri TIM
ST' FAUL MN 6 }1 1 220>
45I0
nXI
1 ?19 271 1005 7
. . .
DONALD Al RV',f.
. . . . . . ... ... ... ... ............................... . ........ ....
JEAN M IACI
. . .. . . . . .. . ......................
A17 SOL PONT LN F
..................................... ............. . ..... . .
AT PAUL 1 712-10 1
4!,10
750
I U?OIll I OW'6
H AP 1) al SCHUI 17 11
JUDITH L 5CIII ILTZ
755 BELMONT LN E
4511)
70D
17 <),i 1 006?
DOROTHY ATHURN
IOJ RAILMOUT I N ki
--------------------
MARI FIROOR MIT 61 ,117-220.3
.........
4610
SON
221 00,`A
'OPTION I. K UILUR
0
RFRNAF I KAI,ff PR
E
70§_PFI�RTQN T 1, N -
' LR
MAPLEWO(A) MN 6511?-2204
111,10
764 !
I OSUvI I fxw!'
NOPTHF AST RF%1DFNk3F INC
ULLM 0 L
------ -----
MAIlL WOOD MN 17 2A05
— ----------- 5!51 .......... . .. -
4510
OVQ?I i(MOr,
CARL PEDRO JR
7I7 III I MON I I N F
LIAIII-FIVOOD UP 551 1 7 , 220',
46
IW
100ev
Roul HT JAIJ I
KIM G MILT',S
OR) BELMONT I, D 0
4510
YIN
109271 lQfIfll
YOSHI TAN{ TRUSTEE
----------- --------
810 [IF I MONT I ANI' I
------- - ------- . ..... .......... ......
.. S F PAJ)L JUN 551 17,2206
4510
750
172S22110AFIC-
DANIEL Al W0,1ACH
CHERYL F INUERCH
0 16 BELMONT AN E
.. . . . . .. ...
MAPLEWOOD MN IZ, I 17
---,UT
4510
.
-- :I�
ISO
....... . ... - 7;';l(xIV4
I q) 11 0(
. ............... . ........
VTFJPHAN %I 8PWG ,
MARIA I HUBIG
i, Ti RARKC w� E
iTW FIIWW� �AIYT��17
I A
lbo
17USS21HOGY
' 6;"±
WAYNE 7HALDu8ER
DOROTHY THIN, HUI q R
04 APRIVE AVE E
ST PAUL NO t)AIlf O
. . . ... . ......... .........
4100
.................. . .. —
750
IND.,
PATH IT I A ��N FILIiN�w
MY BURKE AVS 1-
1 PAUL GO 5�11 ?VN7
4510
V'0
RANDY (; JOHNUI IN
742 ITURXF AST I •
MN V51 �7-2208
4510
m'o
I fT!U21 K x)JI 1
------
LIM AN VANKI FFK
MAR11,: SVANKI.EEK
.......
VIA RHONE i�ET
_MAPLP,G0OD
I ..
........ 4510
7.90
�129221lffl36
DONALDJLUN0
PATRICIA J LUND
751 HURKA, AVL F
STRAUL NO SCI 17AOLT
451(l
750
172
WILLIAM J RVEOWERIH
.............................. ----
SANDRA I. WtGINFLI 111
760BURKE AVE E
. . . . .....................
MAPLEWOOD MR 551
4516
756
172922trMG7
------ RAHAKDfIFIIY
- NOIMES - - -- -
--------- - --- KAREN I FIELL) ..............
.. ... . 701 BURNS AVE E
ST PAUL " ii-YRi
- * - 1
---------- -
45117
790
�
M - A - R -- Y -- L --' * ' I O Ca
. . . ...................................................... . ....
.......... . ?10HURIO, AVL 0
PAUL MN 561174IS09
. . . . . ...
.. . ........... 4510
70
1729221100311
..... . .... ......
A F GETTY JR
OP( HAM JAI GE I'l y
771 RURTO AVF F
ST PAUL MN AIN f7-2297
- NN
4510
7G0
([792 24 7051 6
JEFFREY i SCHOWEI)ER
JACNIF1 ------
fD7 CONNTY ROAD R F
----------- .........
MAPLEW;3i; MI .
.....
........... �S i
.......
7y)
8,29224,30611
6 ON C 0 U N T Y A 0 A D B
AT MN !A,l I r NK)J
451
701
17292212007 6
All C I 1D R
A L 0 VAN
. ........ . ..... . .......
- 7 1- N -1-1-1-
SAO r P TON A
MAPLEWOOD MN 9511' 2116
0
750
17N22130078
BRUCEDWOLD
DERIDE L ROHINY)N
------------- - — — - - - ---------------
"III tV)GE N PON VT N
. . . . .............. . - ----------
MAPIXINOULD MN 551 - 2112
------------
0
750
729,
JOHN 0 HANJATAD
KATHRYN HAILFSTAD
GOA EDGERTON ST N
ST PAUL MY S61 I 7-li IS
1 724221AW56
. A[LAN F'BV[TGjNG
. . . ..... . .. ...
DIANE r NERUNG
2054 iDGFRTON ST N
MAPLEWOOD AIR EMIT Yl 18
. . .. . ................
0
.......... ...........01
750
172922120051
MYRON L WORNSTAD
7074 E DOE STUN !IT N
MARL CVVQOG MN 50 117,2118
1 3
-li2)VelIA
NUNN N`SRY(AWAI', I
. . . . ...... ..........
..
2086 EDGERTON ST : N
........ . . . . . . . ... ... .... ... ..... ....... ... ....
MAPLEWOOD MN 1 ,51 Vi-,ll Pl
. .........
0
7 5,1
1770771:,'0()77
FLOYD E ERICON KS
ELLEN IN ERICKSON
ifH; 94 F,061�RTONJ I; I N
M 1
MARDI FOUND A 5.5117-718
0
750
172022120025
MICHAE-L 6 - - - ------
Ry -
.... .
. ........ . .
2160 EDGERTON ST N
-
MAPLEWOOD HIN 5511 - - -2 - 1
1) .
. ...... -
............ 751)
172NO120024
MICHAEL U RYAN
. ... ....
V 1 05 P GGS R 1 ON � N
— 2
MAPLEWOD MIN 55117 2 155
O
0
750
1721122120023
ICHALL 1) RYAN
1 SM F SiW
11 7 -7115
11
750
8292
TRINITY BAPTIST CHI JOSH
N) I NGF, RTONSI N
MAPI, EV1000 GO 55117-1808
35178
5850
17.0221700'%1
I TIOMADJ MU'PONQIJGH
RENFE L MCDONOUO�
060 ELDRIDGE E
- - --- - - - ---------
MAP GO SAI I 7.2210
.'10
756
I T:Gf:,jfOnVA
. RONALD J SVENDSEN
. . . . . . . ...................................................
TAMMY al SVFNDSHN
-- - ----- - --- 11 --------
650 F I DNID(AF AVF F
MAP[ t�Wo(g) MN MIT 1 T-2E1O
4510
750
172922120053
1 HOMAS V EAVVYSR
DIANE D SAWYFR
661 ELDRIDGE AVE E
MAPLEWOOD MIS 65117 2209
4510
760
I7102V120054
SANDRA K SALVERDA
JUNEA LEWETLiG
43139 FILORILIGE AVE r
STRAOLMNIbbIll),
4510
750
172£127120014
....... BY E V E N J F A A I L L A
....
JO L ff, A RIND N
670 F 1,01RIDGE AVE. F
MAPLEWOOD MN 55117 -2210
J i:LAA�' 12PUit
�46M� �%RU NAAR
RFRECCA J BFRKAS
676 ELDRIDGE AVE E
ST PAUL ON 65117-2209
4510
0
!r - 1 22120049
(,EONS - EA TOREN
. . ............
TiC
MARIA )�Wrl
I CLITRUCK AVE C
Sr PAUL MN
4
0
172922120007
IN SHAWN DELANEY
CAROL L OLLANLY
BOOLLDRIOGE AVE L
MAN rWOOQ MN 55117 22(
4.
STAGY A OTTO
PAO FLNDGE AVE
ST PAUL NO 55117Q, '40
19
T
17292S TGM�
A141 N �,! KTEL
Njf�,TNI)'
FLUR66E. AVE E
, I r VA)
45101
1
LYNN; 8
IVA"I fi
.,�A, MN Rol)
A,&3 A�M
Y)wc I CS I Cr Kw�m).A A, t,a q,,w M
txn bfl 6
kt, ItWXJrT,.,AN P(Oummory M .:3ab:r ( R)ll
K�n�w,w Am'.
f —qxl Of, le
M�,k.,X'd MN
A, StwO
E obt i,
klk I y R'A
K,�.uxj A,. Gt,vS
11",vi 05l K,omwdA;ea SW�Km
[,xI, t* &
Towl Svwt � jo 356,6W
I Mal stoom - S218550
--- ....... . . . . . . ............ . . -
&gip T,Afl A IOSSed _ $1,!W6,458
Exhibit 9
Exhibit 10
nor a mig vev and v, ml mfondod lo N o"d 4, mV I I I i, 11.11, i, a o"Mr I WWII A rec.rds, m I ormalwu And
Kenwood Area Street Improvements
jf Sloan Sewer Assessment Only
................
... ...................
.... .....
............
C&
% M.m,mK
t j
M��
Exhibit 11
Kenwood Area Street Improvements, 0516
Street and SLonn hsscssateitts North of County [load 13
__ ...
� ..4.Ibks ,r v
S
*ili
Ww'Q rxY5tg1i15{5 �Ct4ti4'a j.
�f £.turd, rta.ss,
ilasJs
'wW
h�kRll ltillM1S.
( PMCfw
fIY�1Y3WiIY SIYM.kIn
Exhibit 11
Kenwood Area Street Improvements, 05-16
Street & Storm Assessinents betwcen COUTIty Road B and Rosclown
DIS4 1, AUM Ht 'I Ils, MO sl Ilellfier 41 lvy,fll} wcorded map noi a mirwy and Is, mA m1cmW lo t�, med is, ow, Ffsis III,
,la ll 1,- 11 A L.10 as,J filre..fl .,I luvl "I'd "ghOl :.IilsCl, i"'ilMd If" 11.0 i"a As'.., aad i s
I l
...............
. ........ .
DIS4 1, AUM Ht 'I Ils, MO sl Ilellfier 41 lvy,fll} wcorded map noi a mirwy and Is, mA m1cmW lo t�, med is, ow, Ffsis III,
,la ll 1,- 11 A L.10 as,J filre..fl .,I luvl "I'd "ghOl :.IilsCl, i"'ilMd If" 11.0 i"a As'.., aad i s
l:GanlMc Hwy
VIdN
1 4,u^et UVM,
1 SSS
ieY
Ilimpflins'n A rviiord,, uttos, iuid
h, s.'! Cow jvfomlcN Insrpow, ouI,
>00 for w.d foSid0likil IRIX A
I l
...............
l:GanlMc Hwy
VIdN
1 4,u^et UVM,
1 SSS
ieY
Ilimpflins'n A rviiord,, uttos, iuid
h, s.'! Cow jvfomlcN Insrpow, ouI,
>00 for w.d foSid0likil IRIX A
Exhibit 11
(I4
T, uciffier. ky.tl� ma I, J,JTT J .,I If ,I �,A 'Taolded lo tJe, uwd I., ,JJO III �, ."'j, i, �
'u" Tdc a Jul lOdoal ,I 1j," 11 RI Ot [JOT I hOM&N, JnKf 1, TO 1,0
mumnmimmm
Agenda Item I2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: December 6, 2005
RE: Intoxicating Liquor and 3.2 Beer License Fee Increase
Introduction
Since 1997 the City Council has approved an annual increase in intoxicating liquor and
beer license fees according to the annual inflation rate each given year. State Statute
requirement to notify license holders of an increase has been met. On advisement of
Finance Director Faust, for the 12 -month period ended August 31, 2005 the inflation rate
is 4.7 %.
The city has seen many changes and additions in the types of intoxicating liquor license
establishments over the last few years. With this in mind, staff will be proposing a fee
scale based on occupancy limit and food sales for council consideration at a future
council manager workshop after new council members are on board.
For 2006 staff is suggesting no increase for the on -sale intoxicating license fee for those
establishments that have occupancy of 275 or less. For those over 275 the 4.7% will be
implemented.
The 2006 license fees are proposed as follows:
Intoxicating Liquor is currently $6,995 inflation increase of 4.7% _ $7,324
On -Sale Beer License is currently $212 increase by 4.7% _ $222
Off -Sale Beer License is currently $55 increase by 4.7% _ $58
Recommendation
It is requested that Council approve the above license fee adjustments.
AGENDA NO. I -3
/_ T e 1:11 0 4 10 7_\ 0:11 I i 1: i 1
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 2006 BUDGET AND TAX LEVY
DATE: December 6. 2005
Another public hearing on the proposed property taxes and budget for 2006 has been
scheduled for December 12 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. State law requires that
the final property tax levy and budget be adopted at this public hearing. The tax levy needs
to be adopted before the budget is adopted.
The first resolution attached will levy property taxes payable in 2006. The amounts
listed in the resolution will increase the tax levy by 5.0% and cause an increase of $50 or
less in annual city taxes on 62% of the homes.
The second resolution attached will adopt the 2006 Budget. It includes the revisions to
the proposed budget that are listed in Exhibit A.
P \agn \06BudgetAdoptionHeanng
Exhibit A
2006 OPERATIONS BUDGET REVISIONS
AMBULANCE SERVICE FUND (606)
ADJUSTMENTS:
REV. EXP.
Increase firefighter pension
25,240
Re- allocate full -time employee costs to General Fund
(69,600)
Increase part -time employee costs
30,000
Totals
- (14,360)
ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITY FUND (604)
ADJUSTMENTS:
REV. EXP. TRANSFERS
Add 0.25 FTE Civil Engineer 1 approved by Council on
Additional engineering charges revenue from adding
10 -24 -05
18,030
Add Wetland Enhancement Program
50,000
Decrease transfers to PIP Fund
(150,000)
Totals
- 68,030 (150,000)
GENERAL FUND (101)
ADJUSTMENTS:
REV.
EXP.
Increase fines due to Police Dept. reorganization
approved by Council on 9 -26 -05
38,000
Decrease dispatching contract with North St. Paul to
3% increase
(41,860)
Additional engineering charges revenue from adding
0.75 FTE Civil Eng. 1 position
20,720
Add 1.0 FTE building inspector approved by Council
on 10 -24 -05
55,360
Revised estimate for contract inspectors
17,120
Re- allocate full -time employee costs to fire
suppression from code enforcement
(37,430)
Add back cost of Assistant Emergency Management
Director position
8,890
Adjust for new policy on pension contribution
24,120
Re- allocate full -time employee costs to fire
suppression from code enforcement & EMS
107,030
Increase advertising budget
5,000
Decrease due to Police Dept. reorganization approved
by Council on 9 -26 -05
(25,500)
Increase due to Police Dept. reorganization approved
by Council on 9 -26 -05
5,500
Add 0.75 FTE Civil Engineer 1 approved by Council on
10 -24 -05
39,450
Increase for cost of special election
20,000
All departments - adjust insurance benefits
(27,630)
Totals
16,860
191,910
TOTAL OPERATIONS BUDGET REVISIONS
16,860
245,580 (150,000)
2006 DEBT SERVICE BUDGET REVISIONS
ADJUSTMENTS:
REV.
EXP.
Add amounts for 2005 improvement bonds
186,450
77,930
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE BUDGET REVISIONS
186,450
77,930
LOCATION: P:\ EXCEL \BUDMISC \2006 budget changes3 06- Dec -05
2
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TAXES PAYABLE IN 2006
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that:
1. The following amounts of taxes be levied for 2005, payable in 2006, upon the net tax capacity in said
City of Maplewood, for the following purposes:
Operations
Debt Services
TOTAL LEVY
$11,089,570
2,315,500
$13,405,070
2. In addition, there is a $701,300 market value based referendum levy for 2005 payable in 2006 to
finance the debt service on the 2002 Open Space Refunding Bonds and the 2000 Fire Safety Bonds.
3. The next tax capacity based levy of $2,315,500 for Debt Service and the market value based
referendum levy of $701,300 total $3,016,800. This is a net decrease of $561,535.60 in the scheduled
levy of $4,512,274.60. The breakdown by Debt Service Fund is attached as Exhibit A.
P: TINANCEMORMAGNWdoptBud 06
Exhibit A
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TAXES FOR CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
66- Dec -65
P: \EXCEL \BUDMISC \DEBT SERVICE TAX LEVY
11
SCHEDULED
ADOPTED
INCREASE
LEVY
LEVY
(DECREASE)
334
G.O.
REFUNDING BONDS - 1998B
119,566.00
135,700.00
16,134.00
335
G.O.
IMPROVEMENT BONDS - 1999A
59,505.00
67,000.00
7,495.00
337
G.O.
FIRE SAFETY BONDS - 2000A
311,777.00
316,700.00
4,923.00
338
G.O.
EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES - 2001A
195,615.00
190,970.00
(4,645.00)
339
G.O.
IMPROVEMENT BONDS - 2001 B
177,323.78
178,600.00
1,276.22
340
G.O.
IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS -2001C
61,175.63
-
(61,175.63)
341
G.O.
IMPROVEMENT BONDS - 2002A
246,224.00
-
(246,224.00)
342
G.O.
IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS - 2002B
516,036.00
521,800.00
5,764.00
343
G.O.
TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS - 2002C
622,191.00
341,400.00
(280,791.00)
344
G.O.
OPEN SPACE REFUNDING BONDS - 2002D
405,261.00
384,600.00
(20,661.00)
345
G.O.
IMPROVEMENT BONDS - 2003A
167,520.00
171,300.00
3,780.00
347
G.O.
REFUNDING BONDS - 2004A
16,659.84
18,500.00
1,840.16
348
G.O.
IMPROVEMENT BONDS - 2004B
318,193.52
-
(318,193.52)
349
G.O.
TAX ABATEMENT BONDS - 2004C
151,273.00
317,830.00
166,557.00
350
G.O.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS - 20041
54,692.00
54,500.00
(192.00)
352
G.O.
TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS - 2004F
155,322.83
317,900.00
162,577.17
TOTALS
$3,578,335.60
3,016,800.00
(561,535.60)
66- Dec -65
P: \EXCEL \BUDMISC \DEBT SERVICE TAX LEVY
11
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR 2006
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that a budget for 2006 is hereby adopted as outlined in the following summary:
CAPITAL DEBT
OPERATING IMPROVEMENTS SERVICE
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET TOTAL
Estimated Balances 01 -01 -06
$42,797,663
$889,867
$7,189,536
$50,877,066
Revenues
28,741,540
1,118,450
5,226,100
$35,086,090
Net other increases (decreases)
(454,340)
1,089,750
448,890
$1,084,300
Expenditures
(28,598,620)
(1,095,360)
(6,192,400)
($35,886,380)
Estimated Balances 12 -31 -06
$42,486,243
$2,002,707
$6,672,126
$51,161,076
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the department appropriations totaling as fisted in the
budget booklet are hereby approved for the 2006 Operating Budget:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the expenses for the Community Center Operations Fund
may exceed the appropriation provided that the net operating income before other revenues and expenses
excluding depreciation for 2006 is not less than.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the
2006 Capital Improvements Budget:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
$138,220
FIRE TRUCK REPLACEMENT
280,380
LEGACY VILLAGE TAX ABATEMENT DISTRICT
70
OPEN SPACE
230
PARK DEVELOPMENT
450,000
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
800
REDEVELOPMENT
60
TAX INCREMENT ECONOMIC DEV. DISTRICT #1 -5
22,700
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -1
170
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -2
170
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -3
160
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #14
47,870
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -5
39,630
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -6
94,050
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -7
170
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -8
19,830
WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE — NO. ST. PAUL
40
WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE — ST. PAUL
810
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
$1,095,360
BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS
P: TINANCEMORMAGNWdoptBud 06 5
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director shall establish a budget for each
public improvement project when the Council orders the project and that the budget amounts shall be
recorded at amounts specified in the feasibility study for the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the
2006 Debt Service Budget:
$4,065,000
Principal
2,109,450
Interest
6,520
Paying Agent Fees
8,300
Interest — Interfund loans
3,130
Investment Management
$6,192,400
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above budgets for Governmental Funds are hereby
adopted for financial reporting and management control.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above budgets for all other funds are hereby adopted for
management purposes only.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the transfer of appropriations among the various accounts,
within a fund, shall only require the approval of the City Manager or his designee. However, City
Council approval is required for transfers from contingency accounts.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all appropriations which are not encumbered or expended at
the end of the fiscal year shall lapse and shall become part of the unencumbered fund balance which may
be appropriated for the next fiscal year except appropriations for capital improvement projects which shall
not lapse until the project is completed or canceled by the City Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $168,000 of the fund balance in the General Fund is
designated for contingencies.
P: TINANCEMORMAGNWdoptBud 06 6
Agenda Item K1
Ew4 L , I Will N4107:41
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer
SUBJECT: Roselawn Traffic Issues (35E to Rice)— City Project 05 -25 — Review of
Traffic Engineer's Findings
DATE: December 5, 2005
INTRODUCTION
On July 25, 2005, the City Council received a petition from a number of residents in the Roselawn area
(copy attached) regarding the degradation of their neighborhood due to traffic on Roselawn. An
investigation into the issues along Roselawn was conducted and will be presented to the City Council as a
response to the petition.
Background
The attached petition indicates a major concern with traffic on Roselawn Avenue. The petition indicates
that residents believe that traffic has doubled in the past three years and that a majority is large truck and
school bus traffic. Additionally, roadway speed concerns are noted. A traffic investigation was conducted
to determine the extent of the problems and to identify solutions. Attached is a report from the City's
Consultant Traffic Engineer, Tom Sohrweide, of SEH, Inc. The study monitored the roadway speed and
traffic volumes, some monitoring of traffic noise, some monitoring of air quality, some monitoring of surface
vibration and observing of major traffic flows to quantify the percentage of traffic that is heavy truck and
school bus vehicles. The cost of this monitoring and compilation of the data, along with recommendations
for modifications, was $12,000.
Roselawn Avenue is designated as a collector street in the Comprehensive Plan. A collector street is
defined within the Comprehensive Plan as:
Roadways designed to carry traffic between arterial system and local system, convey intra-
community traffic between neighborhoods, business centers, industries, parks and the like, and
provide direct access to abutting properties. This type of roadway carries moderate traffic volumes
(1,000 -7,000 ADT), allows moderate -to -high speeds (30 -45 MPH), satisfies local trip needs (one to
four miles) and connects local streets with arterials. Spacing of this roadway is about one -half mile.
Traffic volumes on Roselawn were noted in 1998 at 5,600 ADT.
ISSUES /DISCUSSION
The investigation and monitoring identified that Roselawn operates as a fairly typical collector route, with
one exception, bus and heavy truck traffic. Major revisions to the roadway system based on the findings
are probably not likely. Roselawn has access to Interstate 35E. Local roadway restrictions (for example,
significant bus /truck restrictions) would likely create problems in maintaining the 1 -35E access points.
Current Metropolitan Council and MnDOT guidelines restrict access to the interstate system to arterial
roadways or higher classifications and require a one -mile spacing. Because Roselawn is a lower
classification than an arterial, the long range (20 -30+ years) plans would likely eliminate the access point
for Roselawn at 1 -35E. The traffic study addresses these issues and makes a recommendation to consider
some revisions to the bus traffic. Short -term changes may be limited to a review of the restrictions to the
Agenda Item K1
Comfort Bus Facility and the Conditional Use Permit. Further conversations with St. Paul Water are also
warranted.
Options to Proceed
The Council should receive the Traffic Engineer's report and consider some options:
Recommended Option #1: The Comfort Bus CUP was approved for mechanical repair and
maintenance garage in January 2001. Concerns for traffic impacts were discussed in 2001. The
applicant in 2001 wrote the Council that "...Traffic should flow with little disturbance by turning east
toward 135E, west toward the traffic light on Rice Street or north and south onto Rice Street... ". The
CUP requires the applicant to comply with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements as it
relates to all applicable aspects of the vehicle repair operation. Under this option, the Council could
review the CUP for Comfort Bus and consider placing restrictions on bus routes on Roselawn and
Jackson. Under this option, voluntary re- routing of the buses would be attempted and additional
monitoring of the heavy vehicle traffic would be continued.
Recommended Option #2: The St. Paul Water Regional Services (SPRWS) continues to operate
a water distribution and treatment facility at this location. A member of the Council (currently Mayor
Cardinal) sits on the Board for SPRWS. A letter of direction and request for compliance could be
delivered to the SPRWS Board requesting a revision to truck traffic using Roselawn and Jackson.
Similar to Option #1, additional monitoring of heavy traffic would occur. Option #1 and #2 could
occur together.
Not Recommended Option #3: Restrict /post for "No Truck Traffic ". Roselawn and Jackson
are roadways for which the City receives Municipal State Aid monies. Prior to the late 1990's,
Roselawn was a Ramsey County roadway and received County State Aid funds for reconstruction.
One of the provisions of receiving that money is that trucks must be allowed. The failure to follow
state aid rules will likely require the City to repay the state aid fund for the $1.0+ million in
construction funds used to build the roadways to allow for trucks. Additionally, because of the
freeway access at I -35E, truck access must be allowed. If this option is selected, a financing plan
and alternative truck routing plan for access issues will need to be developed.
Recommended Option #4: Restrict parking at the Roselawn /Jackson intersection as
recommended by the Traffic Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council review and receive the report of the City's traffic consultant on the
Roselawn — Jackson area traffic issues. It is recommended that the Council direct the Community
Development Department to conduct a review of the CUP for Comfort Bus as provided by City Code
(Option #1); direct a letter to SPRWS requesting assistance with routing of their truck traffic to their Rice
Street facility (Option #2); and restrict parking as recommended by the Traffic Engineer at the Roselawn —
Jackson intersection (Option #4).
Attachments:
1. Resident Petition
2. SEH Traffic Study (Copies will be provided for Mayor and Council.)
3. Notice Letter to Residents
4. Notice Letter to Comfort Bus and SPRWS
Petition For Noise and Pollution Relief
A Petition of. Affected Residents of Roselawn Avenue and
Neighboring Streets.
Addressed to: Mayor Cardinal and Council Members of
Maplewood, Minnesota
We the undersigned would like to bring your attention to the
following problem and offer our recommendations.
In the past three years the traffic on the portion of Roselawn
Avenue (from Rice Street to I 35E) has doubled. Most of this has
been large truck and school bus traffic. Add to this, the increasing
speed permitted on this stretch of road and the problem becomes a
major noise and safety issue.
The noise and increased air pollution have created an atmosphere
that unreasonably annoys, disturbs, inj ures and endangers the
comfort, repose, health, peace, safety and welfare of persons living
on this street and surrounding areas and precludes their enjoyment
of and adversely affects the property values of their homes
both due to the excessive noise pollution and the structural and real
damage to homes and properties due to the constant vibrations of
truck and bus traffic.
We, therefore, recommend that the City Council undertake a study
of the full impact ofheavv truck traffic on this section of Roselawn
and the distressful impact of hundreds of school buses being
dispersed on a residential street from 6 a.m. until 8:00 and 9:00 pm.
The Noise pollution precludes enjoyment of our property during
day -lime and evening hours and the increased air pollution from
hundreds of buses makes the immediate area a health hazard to
those who have breathing problems as well as to all local residents.
Current noise levels and speed levels are not conducive to a viable
residential neighborhood.
June 16, 2005
Petition for Noise and Pollution Relief
S.
14
ak 4 —Ifs 3
&n— Z-/S 9 - (Qyl/
1iK E. ko^ (I z D o cu �J S A 0 0 B S I— 13A
J G s � /rrow
J r.1
1
17 4
r
18 '1fc��lis �1aCt°�
19
s (j {
�f SS it 7
1c1 ( f �"i tl
The above agreed upon by the following concerned people:
Name: Address: Phone:
6• }t Cd�,.� X. ! "k�4J rC, f SK,i Illrinl
Petition for Noise and Pollution Relief
Name: Address: Phone:
h5'1 �iS9 S 3y
'�hu s sf
22
i
�
LZ
17 za!(AWU} eve
�f J�'�� -7 ��
2;
�r nc��t
� 4% ? �470 ,4. GSA `fS6`6 �f7(o7
26
0
4 f` /I aS,TL 4C.. A (e S( LFS 7- 3.7 `d
27 — J
�h�
1� S�4e��fZ lit Rese`owri 6 5' +- tip�
?g
\ I(
3 ]
i
34
.f �r.., Z
�G��� 1l c/G /1 � E�s�/�v
h5'1 �iS9 S 3y
'�hu s sf
Petition for Noise and Pollution Relief
n
Name: Address:
41 06rVI �4der
Phone:
-//Ip?-,
4,
a
45 �c r� /fit �JGCksOl7 5 ��S — a53�
46 ��f2�ao/v
so 6
4(e
51 f I,�M bn OWNS V
�r�' %1 r I %fli rti,,lv,�
w
>-4 % F
5 9 I9 o .3gt -lCS cn J2
Roselawn Avenue Traffic Study
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
December 5, 2005
,A
/k
SEH
December 5, 2005
RE: Maplewood, Minnesota
Roselawn Avenue Traffic Issues
City Project No. 05 -25
SEH No. A- MAPLE0601.00
Mr. R. Charles AM, PE
Public Works Director /City Engineer
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109 -2702
0-
This letter serves as our final report for the analysis of traffic- related issues on Roselawn Avenue between
Rice Street and I -35E. The residents of the Roselawn Avenue neighborhood, between I -35E and Rice
Street, presented a petition to the Maplewood City Council. The petition requested a study to determine
the impact to the neighborhood of traffic - related issues. The issues of specific concern are traffic volume,
traffic speed, large truck and bus traffic, noise and air pollution, and vibrations.
To address these issues, the City of Maplewood has retained the services of SEH Inc. This letter is a
summary of our findings relative to the data collected with regard to each of these issues.
Traffic
Roselawn Avenue is a two-lane roadway with parking allowed on each side. It is designated as a collector
type roadway with a 30 mph speed limit.
Traffic Volume
The daily traffic volume on Roselawn Avenue west of Adolphus Street has increased from 4,300 vehicles
per day (vpd) in 1994 to 5,500 vpd in 1998 and 2000 and then to 6,200 vpd in 2002. The current traffic
count taken as part of this study finds 6,100 vpd in this same vicinity. When factored for day of the week
and time of year, this compares to an average daily traffic volume of 5,600, comparable to the 1998 —
2000 traffic volumes.
The traffic volume on Roselawn Avenue immediately west of Jackson Street was 3,600 vpd in 1994 and
increased to 4,650 vpd in 2002. The current traffic volume as measured by this study at this location is
5,664 vpd. Again, when averaged for day of the week and time of the year, this compares to an average
daily traffic volume of 5,200. This change combined with current traffic volumes measured near
Adolphus Street indicates an increased traffic use of Jackson Street, which is also designated as a
collector street. The locations of these traffic counts are shown in the attached Figure 1.
This level of traffic volume is consistent with a roadway designation as a collector street and particularly
with other collector streets in the City of Maplewood. The City's Transportation Plan states "This type of
roadway carries moderate traffic volumes (1,000 — 7,000 ADT), allows moderate -to -high speeds (30 — 45
mph), satisfies local trip needs (one to four miles) and connects local streets with arterials."
Other collector streets in the City with comparable traffic volumes (2002 traffic counts), include:
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110 -5196
SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 651.490.2000 1 800.325.2055 1 651.490.2150 fax
Mr. R. Charles Ahl, PE
December 5, 2005
Page 2
• County Road B, east of I -35E — 5,500 vpd
• County Road B, east of Highway 61- 5,300 vpd
• Beam Avenue, east of White Bear Avenue — 4,600 -5,500 vpd
• English Street, south of County Road B — 6,000 vpd
• Lartpenter Avenue, west of White Bear Avenue — 4,000 -6,900 vpd
• Upper Afton Road — 5,100 vpd
The traffic counts west of Jackson Street have revealed that approximately 4.9 percent of the daily traffic
or 280 vpd are school buses. At Adolphus Street, the percentage of school bus traffic remains
approximately the same at 4.7 percent with the number of buses at that location on a daily basis being
approximately 143.
Traffic counts also revealed that heavy truck traffic accounts for approximately 5.2 percent, or 299 vpd, at
Jackson Street and 4.3 percent or 132 vpd at Adolphus Street.
While we do not have comparative data from within the City of Maplewood, this total of approximately
10% of the daily traffic being comprised of buses and heavy trucks, is high for a collector street. The
Minnesota Depamtient of Transportation roadway design standards indicate that designs for metropolitan
roadways should consider a heavy truck volume of 3.6% and a bus/truck with trailer volume of 0.5% of
the daily traffic volume. Obviously, the presence of the Comfort Bus facility to the west, generates the
bus traffic, while the St. Paul Water Services facility to the west on the north side of Roselawn Avenue
and the office park area at the I -35E interchange produce truck traffic.
Because of Roselawn Avenue being a State Aid roadway, heavy truck or bus traffic cannot be prohibited.
The city attorney will need to address whether the City can restrict the Comfort Bus traffic to Rice Street,
through their Conditional Use Permit.
Obviously, some of the traffic volume on Roselawn Avenue is due to the interchange with 1 -35E.
Interstate highway interchanges are usually with arterial roadways and not collector roadways, as in this
case. Minnesota Department of Transportation's current plans call for removal of that interchange due to
improvements to the Highway 36 interchange by the year 2030. If the interchange is removed, Roselawn
Avenue would serve as a more typical collector roadway, by delivering local traffic to and from arterial
roadways Rice Street on the west and Highway 61 on the east.
At the present time, Roselawn Avenue adds approximately 4,800 vpd to I -35E and accepts approximately
5,000 vpd from 1 -35E. Based on traffic count information, both east and west of I -35E on Roselawn
Avenue, we estimate that the I -35E ramp closures will reduce traffic volume on Roselawn Avenue by
approximately 2,500 vpd. It does appear that the closure of this interchange will reduce car and heavy
truck traffic volume, but will have little impact on reducing the number of buses.
Traffic Speed
The data collection also included traffic speed information. Measured were the 85 percentile speed and
the average speed. The 85 percentile speed is a speed at which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling or
slower than. This is generally a major input to determining speed limits. The 85 percentile speed on
Roselawn Avenue, west of Jackson Street, was found to be 36 miles per hour with the average speed
being 31 miles per hour. The 85 percentile speed at Adolphus Street was found to be 38 miles per hour
with the average speed of 32 miles per hour.
Mr. R. Charles Ahl, PE
December 5, 2005
Page 3
Parking
Concern has been expressed by the neighborhood with regard to parking at the intersection of Roselawn
Avenue and Jackson Street. At this time, parking is allowed on both sides of Roselawn from Beaumont
Street to the east. Through observations at varying times of the day and days of the week, we have not
been able to verify a parking problem. If parking is occurring near the intersection and creating a sight
obstruction, parking can be prohibited to provide the needed sight distance.
Sight distance is necessary at an intersection; at a minimum to allow for approaching vehicles to stop if a
car were to pull out from the side street; or at a maximum to allow the vehicle on the side street at the stop
sign to be able to determine if they can safely pull out. To assure sight distance exists at the
RoselawnlJackson intersection, would require prohibiting parking for either 120 or 250 feet on the south
side of Roselawn to the east of Jackson and on the north side of Roselawn to the west of Jackson. In
addition, parking would need to be prohibited for either 230 or 450 feet on the south side of Roselawn to
the west of Jackson and on the north side of Roselawn to the east of Jackson.
Also noted is that Roselawn Avenue is approximately 40 feet wide to the west of Jackson Street, and
approximately 34 feet wide to the east of Jackson Street. Parking in the area where the roadway is 34 feet
wide impacts traffic such that two vehicles cannot meet at the location of a parked car without diverting
from the marked traffic lanes and the vehicle on the side of the parked car having to cross the centerline.
Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Prohibiting parking will also benefit pedestrians and bicyclists. Roselawn Avenue has pavement marking
which creates a five foot wide roadway shoulder area on both sides of the street from Jackson Street to the
east. This area accommodates the pedestrians, bicyclists, and parking. The presence of parking requires
pedestrians and bicyclists to move into the through traffic lanes. While parking removal would better
accommodate bicycle traffic, pedestrian activity on a five foot shoulder with this level of traffic volume
would be better served with an off road sidewalk.
Vibration Monitoring
As indicated in the attached report from our subconsultant, GME Consultants, Inc., vibration monitoring
was done at three residences along Roselawn Avenue. The monitoring was done over the time period
from September 19 to September 26, 2005. The findings of this monitoring "are below the levels that
would normally result in damage to soundly constructed buildings ". The findings of this monitoring are
very similar and typical to results gathered in gathered in residential urban settings. The location of sites
monitored is shown in Figure 2.
Noise Monitoring
Noise monitoring was conducted at four separate locations (shown in Figure 2) in the Roselawn Avenue
corridor. The monitoring was done during both nighttime and daytime hours and at times with normal
bus traffic and reduced bus traffic. As indicated in the attached report, the noise levels during nighttime
hours exceed the state nighttime noise compliance. This appears to be due to the ambient noise levels
from I -35E. These findings appear typical for an urban setting within close proximity of a major
highway.
All monitoring locations meet daytime state compliance levels with the exception of the corner of
Roselawn Avenue and Jackson Street. This location exceeds the daytime state compliance levels
apparently due to the volume of bus traffic. When measured with reduced bus volumes (school not in
session), this location did meet daytime state compliance.
Mr. R. Charles Ahl, PE
December 5, 2005
Page 4
Air Quality
Air sampling was done at the intersection of Roselawn Avenue and Jackson Street as described in the
attached report. The monitoring found that the location to be well below health standard benchmarks and
not significantly different from test monitoring sites in the St. Paul area. The concentrations measured at
this intersection are likely similar to what would be found at any street in the metropolitan area with
similar traffic volumes.
Summary
In summary, the traffic volumes are not out of line for a collector street and similar streets within the City,
although there is a significant amount of bus and truck traffic. The amount of bus traffic appears to create
noise levels which are above daytime state compliance levels. The noise study indicates that the
elimination or a significant reduction in bus traffic would bring this area into compliance with the state
daytime noise levels.
Traffic speeds, although higher than the existing speed limit do not appear out of line as compared to
other collector roadways in the metro area.
It does appear that traffic volumes will decrease on the roadway in the future, with the elimination of the
I- 35E(Roselawn Avenue interchange.
Monitoring of both vibrations and air quality did not reveal a problem with either of these areas.
Sincerely,
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
Thomas A. Sohrweide, PE, PTOE
Project Manager
run
Attachments
xuaw��msoruao�nmizasos.aoo
Roselawn Avenue Figure' ReNo. },
200 Date: 11/ 30/ 05 Noah 5 Daily AMAPLE0501.00
Maplewood, Minnesota Traffic Volumes $EH
Roselawn Avenue Figure2 File No. },
Noise, Vibration and Air AMAPLE0501.00
aplewood, Minnesota Monitoring ocations $EH
9 Date: 11/ 30/ 05 Noah
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
Geotechnical'o Materials a Environmental Engineers
14000 21st Ave. No. / Minneapolis, MN 55447
Phone (763) 559 -1859 / Fax (763) 559 -0720
October 7, 2005
Mr. Tom Sohrweide, P.E.
SEH, Inc.
3535 Vadnais Center Drive
St.Paul, Minnesota 55110 GME Project No. 11585
RE: Report of vibration monitoring along Roselawn Avenue between
I -35E and Rice Street in St.Paul, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Sohrweide:
We have completed our vibration monitoring survey at the above -
referenced location, following your acceptance of our contract dated
August 3, 2005. You verbally authorized us to proceed on September
3, 2005.
Project Description
The residents who live along Roselawn Avenue between I -35E and Rice
Street have submitted a petition to the City of Maplewood asking
that the level of vibrations caused by vehicles driven on Roselawn
Avenue be investigated. SEH has been retained by the City to
investigate the vibration levels, as well as noise and air
pollution, generated by traffic along this stretch of Roselawn
Avenue. You asked that we perform vibration monitoring at three
different locations along the route for a period of five days.
Vibration Monitoring
We performed our investigation from September 19 to September 26,
2005. We monitored vibrations at the residences at 1930 Jackson
Street, 105 Roselawn Avenue, and 142 Roselawn Avenue, using our
Geosonics 2000DK seismographs. These seismographs are continuous -
monitoring, self - triggering units that record vibration events on a
three - dimensional coordinate system. The seismographs record
vibrations above the pre -set trigger levels that we determine. The
specifications for this project did not provide a minimum or maximum
level for the vibrations, so we programmed a conservative preset
trigger level of 0.02 to 0.10 inches per second lips), as the
resultant of vibrations along the three axes. The seismograph can
detect a vibration lower than the trigger along any one axis.
WILLIAM C. KWASNY, P.E. THOMAS P. VENEMA, P.E. GREGORY R. REUTER, P.E., P.G.
RYAN F. SCHMIDT, P.E. WILLIAM BLOEMENDAL, P.E. RICHARD W. PENNINES, P.E.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Mr. Tom Sohrweide, P.E. 2 October 7, 2005
GME Project No. 11585
We recorded 15 vibration events among the three seismographs during
the week of monitoring. The vibration events ranged from 0.01 to
0.31 ips, with wave frequencies between 1 and 250 hertz. A summary
of the recorded events is attached.
The U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Surface Mining (OSM)
has published data (USBM RI 8507, 1980) presenting safe limits of
vibration levels to avoid cosmetic damage to structures from
blasting. We use these data as guidelines for interpreting the
results of vibration monitoring from activities such as construction
and traffic. Based on the OSM guidelines, the vibrations we
recorded on this project are below the levels that would normally
result in damage to soundly constructed buildings, at the times and
locations we monitored.
Standard of Care
We have endeavored to conduct our engineering services for this
project in a manner consistent with that level of skill and care
ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently
practicing in this area, under similar budgetary and time
constraints.
If you have questions regarding this report, please contact us.
Sincerely,
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
A� V
Leslie J. Nordby, E.I.T.
Project Engineer
7 aeir�,Iaee_
William C. Kwasny, P.E.
Principle Engineer /President
Enclosures: Vibration Monitoring Summary Sheet
LJN:fhs:smc
I. \I�H \11585 Roaelawn RPC 1jn
OWN CONSULTANTS. INC.
Client
project
Operation
Location
Operator
Model
Serial #
Recording Time
SEH, Inc.
Roselawn Avenue Vibration Investigation
Ambient Traffic
Maplewood, MN
t.JN/GME
2000 DK
2289,2814,2137
9/19/05 - 9126(05
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
14000 21st Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447
PH(763)559-16W Fax(763)569-0720
VIBRATION MONITORING SUMMARY SHEET
SEH, Inc. 1 of 2 Vibration Monitoring
Trigger
Level
peakpattidie
V
, ..._
F u[en . .....
Maximum
L
I
v
L
I V
Serial #
Location
Date
Time
Event#
f
lips)
(cps)
lips)
(Hz)
(Hz) (Hz)
PPV (fps)
:..
1930 Jackson Street
2289
West Entrance Steps
9119/05
9:33
0.05
install Seismograph
2289
West Entrance Steps
9/20105
13:55
0.02
*Check Unit
2289
West Entrance Steps
9/21/05
9:12
90
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
31
31
25
0.03
2289
West Entrance Steps
9/21/05
13:57
0.05
'Check Unit
2289
West Entrance Steps
9/26/05
11:46
0.05
Remove Seismograph
142 Roselawn Avenue
2814
Front Steps on north side of house
9/19/05
9:18
0.05
install Seismograph
2814
Front Steps on north side of house
9/19/05
9:20
"117
0.05
0.21
0.14
0.04
8
7
63
0.21
2814
Front Steps on north side of house
9/20/05
14:04
0.02
Check Unit
2814
Front Steps on north side of house
9121105
7:00
118
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
9
15
8
0.03
2814
Front Steps on north side of house
9/21105
7:45
119
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.03
9
6
14
0.03
2814
Front Steps on north side of house
9/21/05
10:06
120
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.02
11
83
19
0.03
2814
Front Steps on north side of house
9/21/05
12:25
121
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.03
18
2
13
0.03
2814
Front Steps on north side of house
9/21/05
13:44
122
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.03
10
167
12
0.03
2814
Front Steps on north side of house
9121/05
14:03
0.05
`Check Unit
2814
Front Steps on north side of house
9122105
10:49
123
0.05
0.10
031
0.05
1
1
125
0.31
2814
Front Steps on north side of house
9126/05
11:58
0.05
Remove Seismograph
105 Roselawn Avenue
2137
Sidewalk at northwest comer of house
9/19/05
9:47
0.05
Install Seismograph
2137
Sidewalk at northwest comer of house
9/19105
17:22
339
0.05
0.04
0.02
0.08
50
83
45
0.08
2137
Sidewalk at northwest comer of house
9/19105
17:24
340
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.08
125
250
36
0.08
2137
Sidewalk at northwest comer of house
9/19/05
17:32
341
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.26
36
50
0
0.18
2137
Sidewalk at northwest caner of house
9/19/05
17:52
342
0.05
0.04
0.06
0.18
1
2
1
0.08
2137
Sidewalk at northwest comer of house
9/19105
18:00
343
0.05
0.02
0.06
0.08
36
45
2
2137
Sidewalk at northwest comer of house
9120105
13:58
0.10
*Check Unit
2137
Sidewalk at northwest comer of house
9112/05
11:55
344
0.10
0.06
0.08
0.12
100
1
36
0.12
SEH, Inc. 1 of 2 Vibration Monitoring
SEH, Mo. 2 of 2 V6mfion Mor tft
Roselawn Avenue Ambient Noise Study
City of Maplewood, MN
October 28, 2005
Table of Contents
Page
1.0
Sound and Noise Descriptions ....................................... ..............................1
1.1 Sound Pressure Level ( dBA) ..................................... ..............................2
2.0
Project Scope and Description ...................................... ..............................3
3.0
Evaluation and Process .................................................. ..............................3
4.0
Noise Monitoring ............................................................. ..............................4
4.1 Receptor 1 ................................................................. ..............................4
4.2 Receptor 2 ................................................................ ...............................
5
4.3 Receptor 3 ................................................................. ..............................6
4.4 Receptor 4 ................................................................. ..............................7
4.5 Receptor 4 Light Bus Activity ..................................... ..............................8
6.0
Noise Survey Summary .................................................. ..............................8
6.0
Conclusion ...................................................................... .............................10
Appendix A "Receptor Locations"
Appendix B "Raw Monitoring Data"
Roselawn Avenue Page i
Noise Analysis
1.0 Sound and Noise Descriptions
Sound is described as varying pressures, from low to high, which are
induced by disturbances in the air. These pressures present themselves
in the form of periodic waveforms and are measured in cycles per
second. When these varying pressures reach the human ear, they are
converted by our eardrums and brain, to sound. To describe how much
pressure (loudness) these waves apply to the eardrum, we use SPL, or
Sound Pressure Level.
Sound is made up of many components. Among them there are "pure
tones" which represent one single waveform, and there is "broad
band" sound. That is, many different waveforms arriving at the ear
simultaneously.
One might think of a pure tone as a single key depressed on a piano.
Whereas broadband sound, many keys pressed simultaneously from
low to high. The waveforms produced all have a different frequency
of cycles per second.
The human ear is capable of hearing a wide range of frequencies, from
low tones to high. Individual frequencies are expressed in Hertz (Hz),
which takes the place of cycles per second. Sounds low in nature, such
as an upright stringed bass, are expressed in low Hz. The accepted
limit of human hearing in the low regions is 20Hz, or 20 cycles per
second. Those sounds higher up, such as a piccolo, are expressed in
kilohertz( kHz), or thousands of cycles per second. The accepted high
range of human hearing is 20kHz, or 20,000 cycles per second. Middle
C on a piano for instance, has a frequency of 261.5 cycles per second,
or 261.5Hz.
Sound, either low or high in nature, travels at a relative speed of 1130
feet per second. This varies slightly due to humidity and relative
temperature. Ultimately, it is important to note that low sounds do not
travel slower than high sounds as some might suspect.
Sound also has a loudness component (SPL). This is scientifically
expressed as amplitude. In describing how humans hear variances in
amplitude (or pressure), we use a measure known as a decibel (dB).
The decibel is a logarithmic /ratio description given to sound loudness
as the human hear is quite sensitive to very quiet sounds, and of
course, those very loud. It is appropriate to use logarithms due to this
wide range of human hearing - the human ear can detect sounds a
million times quieter than a jet aircraft during take -off. Thus the
decibel is a logarithmic function used to accommodate a numbering
scheme that encompasses a very large range of values.
Roselawn Avenue Page 1
Noise Analysis
Decibels, in their logarithmic function, can then be broken down
accordingly:
• tl dB change in loudness = no noticeable change in loudness
• t3dB change in loudness = just perceptible threshold difference in
loudness
• t6dB change in loudness = a clearly noticeable difference in
loudness
• t10dB change in loudness — twice (or half) change in loudness
• t20dB change in loudness = a fourfold (4x) change in loudness
Humans also hear various frequencies (low and high tones) in a non-
linear fashion. Our ears are most sensitive in the middle frequencies,
those that encompass the range of human speech, than those sounds at
the low and high range of tone. To associate the decibel with this non -
linearity, we weight our measurements. There are various weighting
schemes, but the one we most commonly use to approximate human
hearing is "A" weighting. Given that we are measuring sound with
regards to how we humans respond to it, sound levels will be
described as XdBA.
Here is a decibel scale, A weighted, of common sound and noise
sources:
1.1 Sound Pressure Level (dBA)
140dBA
Jet Engine (at 25 meters)
130dBA
Jet Aircraft (at 100 meters)
120dBA
Rock and Roll Concert
110dBA
Pneumatic Chipper
100dBA
Jointer /Planer
90dBA
Chainsaw
80dBA
Heavy Truck Traffic
70dBA
Business Office
60dBA
Conversational Speech
50dBA
Library
40dBA
Bedroom
30dBA
Secluded Woods
20dBA
Whisper
Fig. 1 dBA Scale ofEgnivalent Noise Soncce
Roselawn Avenue
Noise Analysis Page 2
2.0 Project Scope and Description
SEH has performed an environmental noise survey to address existing
noise levels along Roselawn Avenue and surrounding neighborhoods
to asses Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Noise
Guidelines and compliance.
3.0 Evaluation and Process
This environmental noise analysis is being performed according to
MPCA guidelines with regards to noise in and around the Roselawn
Avenue corridor.
The methods used are in accordance with State and Federal mandated
noise monitoring methods and apply to on -site measurement. On -site
measurement was performed at four locations along the corridor
between the hours of 4:OOAM- 7:OOAM and again from 3:OOPM to
6:OOPM. The measurement sites include areas of existing residential
housing and common use areas regarded by the MPCA as residing
within the NAC -1 classification.
The MPCA has established guidelines for both residential and
industrial zones and acceptable SPL maximums for both.
These guidelines, measured in dBA, are stipulated in the form of Lio
and LSO. Simply stated, LIO means that the measured SPL (in dBA)
must not exceed a certain threshold more than 10% of the time (for a
one hour survey), and L50, being a level, which must not be, exceeded
more than 50% of the time (again, for a one hour survey). These
thresholds are listed as SPL (dBA) maximums by the MPCA for
residential areas, as follows:
7030.0050 Noise Area Classification (NAC)1 (Household Units
including Farm Houses) I
Daytime LIo Lo
(7:OOAM- 10:00PM) 65dBA 60dBA
Nighttime L L50
(10:00PM- 7:OOAM) 55dBA 50dBA
" "A Gnide to Noise Control in Minnesota ". Brian Timecson. MPCA
Roselawn Avenue Page 3
Noise Analysis
4.0 Noise Monitoring
4.1 Receptor 1, 206 E Roselawn Ave.
All noise measurements were performed with a Type 1, ANSI
approved and calibrated sound level meter (SLM). Calibrations were
performed before and after each 1 -hour testing cycle to maintain
accuracy. Additionally, weather conditions were monitored, an
anemometer used to gauge wind speed, and relative humidity and
pressure readings taken. A windscreen was also used during all
monitoring events.
The first monitored receptor was located adjacent to Highway 35E and
represented the furthest easterly monitoring location.
The SLM was calibrated and then placed into operation for one hour in
accordance with MPCA and Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) measurement procedures and then calibrated once again
after the measurement period. Placement of the SLM was 55 feet from
the centerline of Roselawn Ave. and in the front yard of the residence.
A digital picture was taken of receptor 1 for record, as was receptor 2,
3, and 4, and notes taken about present noise sources and existing
traffic. For reference, receptor 1 is represented here in Figure 3.
Noise monitoring at receptor 1 occurred at 2:58PM- 3:58PM
September 14, and represented the first hour of evening peak traffic
within the surrounding neighborhoods and along the Roselawn
corridor.
Roselawn Avenue
Noise Analysis Page 4
Fignre 3, Receptor 1, facing southeast towards 35E
Morning ( "Nighttime" as per MPCA classification) monitoring
occurred at 4:50AM- 5:50AM September 23.
Corresponding noise levels were moderate at this location and can be
attributed to the higher traffic volumes along 35E. Bus and heavy
truck traffic was minimal.
Noise levels, for the 1 -hour duration measured are presented here (for
detailed raw noise data, please refer to "Appendix BP'Raw Monitoring
Data ").
Fig. 4, Monitored receptor 1 levels, dBA. Gray areas represent those levels above MPCA guidelines.
4.2 Receptor 2, 151 E. Roselawn Ave.
Fig. 5, Receptor 2 looking north across Roselawn Ave.
Traffic noise levels at this receptor were measured during the evening
rush hour from 4:02PM to 5:02PM. September 14. Existing noise
levels were elevated during the afternoon cycle as heavy truck and bus
traffic was observed during this hour, but not over and above MPCA
guidelines.
Roselawn Avenue
Noise Analysis Page 5
This noise monitoring location was north of Roselawn Ave and
directly west of receptor 1. The SLM was placed 125' from the
centerline of Roselawn.
Receptor 1
1 Lio
Leo
Daytime 2:58PM- 3:58PM
65dBA
58dBA
Nighttime 4:50AM- 5:50AM 59dBA_
56dBA:'
Fig. 4, Monitored receptor 1 levels, dBA. Gray areas represent those levels above MPCA guidelines.
4.2 Receptor 2, 151 E. Roselawn Ave.
Fig. 5, Receptor 2 looking north across Roselawn Ave.
Traffic noise levels at this receptor were measured during the evening
rush hour from 4:02PM to 5:02PM. September 14. Existing noise
levels were elevated during the afternoon cycle as heavy truck and bus
traffic was observed during this hour, but not over and above MPCA
guidelines.
Roselawn Avenue
Noise Analysis Page 5
This noise monitoring location was north of Roselawn Ave and
directly west of receptor 1. The SLM was placed 125' from the
centerline of Roselawn.
Morning monitoring occurred between the hours of 4:53AM and
5:53AM September 21. Noise levels were elevated due to heavy truck
and bus traffic along Roselawn. Noise levels, for the 1 -hour duration
measured are presented below (for detailed raw noise data, please
refer to "Appendix B /Raw Monitoring Data ").
Receptor 2 1 Lto Leo
Daytime 4:02PM- 5:02PM 64dBA 57dBA
Nighttime (4:53AM- 5:53AM) 159dBA 57dBA'
Fig. 6, Monitored levels Receptor 2, dBA. Gray areas represent those levels above MPCA guidelines.
4.3 Receptor 3, 150 Downs Ave.
The third noise monitoring location was located within the backyard of
a residence north of receptor 2 and along Downs Ave. This receptor
was place 150' directly north of the receptor 2 location in order to
obtain a reading at a further distance from Roselawn Ave. and into the
interior neighborhoods.
Traffic levels at this location were quiet along Downs during both AM
and PM monitoring events, with noise evident from 35E and busses
along Roselawn. Afternoon monitoring occurred from 4:02PM-
5:02PM September 15 and morning monitoring occurring from
5:53AM- 6:53AM September 23. Heavy bus traffic was recorded
during both monitoring events, proceeding along Roselawn.
Roselawn Avenue
Noise Analysis Page 6
Fig. 7, Receptor 3 Looking south towards Roselawn from Downs.
Noise levels, for the 1 -hour duration measured are presented below
(for detailed raw noise data, please refer to "Appendix B /Raw
Monitoring Data ").
Fig. 8, Monitored levels at Receptor 3, dBA. Gray areas represent those levels above MPCA guidelines.
4.4 Receptor 4, 106 E. Roselawn Ave
The fourth monitoring location was located at the southeast comer of
Roselawn Ave. and Jackson St. This location encountered heavy bus
and truck traffic from vehicles turning south during the morning hours,
and west during the evening hours and, consequently, experiences the
highest ambient noise levels of all receptors monitored.
Noise levels, for the 1 -hour duration measured are presented below
(for detailed raw noise data, please refer to "Appendix B /Raw
Monitoring Data ").
Roselawn Avenue
Noise Analysis Page 7
Monitoring at this location was performed between the morning hours
of 6:05AM- 7:05AM, and during the evening rush hour times of
4:02PM- 5:02PM. The sound level meter resided 55' from the center
line south of Roselawn, and 85' from the centerline of Jackson.
Receptor 3
Ljo
Leo
Daytime 4:02PM- 5:02PM
56dBA
54dBA
Nighttime 5:53AM- 6:53AM 58dBA__56dBA:'
Fig. 8, Monitored levels at Receptor 3, dBA. Gray areas represent those levels above MPCA guidelines.
4.4 Receptor 4, 106 E. Roselawn Ave
The fourth monitoring location was located at the southeast comer of
Roselawn Ave. and Jackson St. This location encountered heavy bus
and truck traffic from vehicles turning south during the morning hours,
and west during the evening hours and, consequently, experiences the
highest ambient noise levels of all receptors monitored.
Noise levels, for the 1 -hour duration measured are presented below
(for detailed raw noise data, please refer to "Appendix B /Raw
Monitoring Data ").
Roselawn Avenue
Noise Analysis Page 7
Monitoring at this location was performed between the morning hours
of 6:05AM- 7:05AM, and during the evening rush hour times of
4:02PM- 5:02PM. The sound level meter resided 55' from the center
line south of Roselawn, and 85' from the centerline of Jackson.
Receptor 4 Lto Leo
Daytime 4:02PM- 5:02PM 70dBA 62dBA<
Nighttime 6:05AM- 7:05AM 68dBA 57dBA'
Fig. 8, Monitored levels at Receptor 4, dBA. Gray areas represent those levels above MICA guidelines.
4.5 Receptor 4 Light Bus Activity
A final round of monitoring was performed at receptor 4 in an attempt
to capture noise levels during rush hour, and at times when there was
little to no bus traffic. This was facilitated by a local teacher's
convention occurring during the days of October 20 and 21 st .
Monitoring tools place on the morning Thursday October 20 between
the hours of 6:OOAM and 7:OOAM, and again on Friday between the
hours of 4:OOPM and 5:OOPM. These hours represented morning peals
rush hours and those times as specified as "nighttime" by the MPCA,
and evening peals rush hours and specified as "daytime" by the MPCA.
And, while there was the hope that bus traffic would be non - existent
due to the absence of school, 6 -7 busses were observed during
monitoring.
This level of bus traffic passes is roughly 10% of what has been
observed during peals bus levels and will be considered as enough of a
drop off as to be considered measurable.
Noise levels, for the 1 -hour duration measured are presented below
(for detailed raw noise data, please refer to "Appendix B /Raw
Monitoring Data ").
Fig. 9, Monitored levels at Receptor 4, dBA. Gray areas represent those levels above MPCA guidelines
5.0 Noise Monitoring Summary
Noise monitoring was performed at various receptors along the
Roselawn Ave. corridor to assess impacts created by heavy bus and
truck traffic during the peals morning outbound hours, and again
during the peals evening hours when busses were presumably returning
to their storage facility.
In order to judge possible impacts created during times without heavy
bus or truck traffic, two of the four receptors were monitored
immediately before what are considered to be the heaviest truck and
bus volumes, from 5:OOAM to 6:OOAM, and within the more stringent
MPCA thresholds classified as "nighttime" (10:00PM- 7:OOAM).
Roselawn Avenue
Noise Analysis Page 8
Receptor 4 Li ht Bus Activity
Lto
Leo
Daytime 4:03PM- 5:03PM
62dBA
57dBA
Nighttime 6:01AM- 7:02AM
62dBA
56dBAJ
Fig. 9, Monitored levels at Receptor 4, dBA. Gray areas represent those levels above MPCA guidelines
5.0 Noise Monitoring Summary
Noise monitoring was performed at various receptors along the
Roselawn Ave. corridor to assess impacts created by heavy bus and
truck traffic during the peals morning outbound hours, and again
during the peals evening hours when busses were presumably returning
to their storage facility.
In order to judge possible impacts created during times without heavy
bus or truck traffic, two of the four receptors were monitored
immediately before what are considered to be the heaviest truck and
bus volumes, from 5:OOAM to 6:OOAM, and within the more stringent
MPCA thresholds classified as "nighttime" (10:00PM- 7:OOAM).
Roselawn Avenue
Noise Analysis Page 8
One "daytime" (7:OOAM- 10:00PM) measurement timeframe outside
of peals bus and truck traffic was logged at Receptor 1.
Finally, the most effected receptor, Receptor 4, was measured during
evening and nighttime rush hour time frames and without a large
percentage of bus traffic.
All monitoring locations and time frames are consolidated here within
Figures 10 and 11:
Fig. 10, Monitored levels at all Receptors, dBA. Gray areas represent those levels above MPCA guidelines. (-)Indicates
measurement times outside of heavy bns and truck traffic
R 1 (Night) 206 E. Roselawn (4:50AM- 5:50AM)*
59dBA I 56dBA <I
4dB
6dB
R 2 (Night) 151 E. Roselawn (4:53AM- 5:53AM)*
59dBA 57dBA ''
4dB
7dB
R 3 (Night) 150 Downs (5:53AM- 6:53AM)
58dBA 56dBA ''
3dB
6dB
R 4 (Night) 106 E. Roselawn (6:05AM- 7:05AM)
68dBA 57dBA ''
13dB
7dB
R 4 (Night) Light Bus Activity (6:01AM- 7:02AM)
62dBA 56dBA ''
7dB
6dB
MWINN
R 1 (Day) 206 E. Roselawn (2:58- 3:58PM)*
65dBA
58dBA
OdB
OdB
R 2 (Day) 151 E. Roselawn (4:02- 5:02PM)
64dBA
57dBA
OdB
OdB
R 3 (Day) 150 Downs (4:02- 5:02PM)
56dBA
54dBA
OdB
OdB
R 4 (Day) 106 E. Roselawn (4:02- 5:02PM)
70dBA
62dBA ''
5dB
2dB
R 4 (Day) Light Bus Activity (4:03- 5:03PM)
62dBA I
57dBA
OdB
OdB
Fig. 10, Monitored levels at all Receptors, dBA. Gray areas represent those levels above MPCA guidelines. (-)Indicates
measurement times outside of heavy bns and truck traffic
R 1 (Night) 206 E. Roselawn (4:50AM- 5:50AM)*
59dBA I 56dBA <I
4dB
6dB
R 2 (Night) 151 E. Roselawn (4:53AM- 5:53AM)*
59dBA 57dBA ''
4dB
7dB
R 3 (Night) 150 Downs (5:53AM- 6:53AM)
58dBA 56dBA ''
3dB
6dB
R 4 (Night) 106 E. Roselawn (6:05AM- 7:05AM)
68dBA 57dBA ''
13dB
7dB
R 4 (Night) Light Bus Activity (6:01AM- 7:02AM)
62dBA 56dBA ''
7dB
6dB
Fig. 11, Monitored levels at all Receptors, dBA. Gray areas represent those levels above MPCA guidelines. ( *) Indicates
measurement times outside of heavy bns and truck traffic
Observations developed from on -site noise analysis are summarized
within this bulleted list:
• All monitored receptors meet daytime state compliance with
the exception of receptor 4 during heavy bus activity.
• Receptor 4 meets daytime state noise compliance with
diminished bus activity.
• All receptors exceed state nighttime noise standards.
• Measurement at receptor 4, and during times with diminished
bus traffic during early morning (`nighttime ") hours, reveals
that this location still exceeds state nighttime compliance.
However, the levels measured without heavy bus traffic fall
within levels measured at the other receptors and within 3dB-
at the human ears threshold considered to be noticeable. This
drop in associated noise levels is indicative of the increased
levels experienced during normal bus traffic.
Roselawn Avenue
Noise Analysis Page 9
By removal of 90% of bus traffic levels, this receptor
experiences levels roughly the same as the measured ambient
background noise, or what would be typical in this
neighborhood given traffic noise from 35E.
• All receptors were subject to ambient noise levels during all
monitoring events from adjacent 35E. These ambient noise levels
were high enough to push all receptors above state nighttime noise
compliance at all locations. And, although noise was evident from
35E during the afternoon hours, these levels were not high enough
to exceed state daytime standards.
Monitored noise levels without major bus activity and within the
neighborhoods residing along Roselawn Ave. are typical considering
an urban setting and one within close proximity of a major highway.
The presence of school bus traffic during both daytime and nighttime
hours appears to be a contributor to noise levels which exceed state
standards.
Roselawn Avenue
Noise Analysis Page 10
Roselawn Avenue Appendix File No. },
Noise and Air AMAPLE0501.00
Maplewood, Minnesota I Monitoring ocations $EH
g Date: 11/ 30/ 05 Noah
Sound Level Meter Summary
Translated:
4- Oct -05 901:04
Model Number:
814
Serial Number:
A0225
Firmware Rev:
1.026
Software Version:
1.07
Name:
Larson Davis 814
Descr1:
Madison /Minneapolis
Descr2:
Acoustics and Noise
Setup:
KentSLM.slm
Setup Descr:
Kent MPCA Test Standard
Octave Filters:
1/1 Octave Filters, 1/3 Octave Filters
Location:
R1 206 E Roselawn 73F, Clear,
64 %RH, winds 3
-5mph from
Note 1:
Most noise from 35E, 12 busses, 10Hvy Trucks
Note 2:
Overall Measurement
Current Measurement
Start Time:
14- Sep -05 14:58:51
Start Time
14:58:51 PM
Elapsed Time
1:0014
Elapsed Time
1:0014
Leq:
61.4
Leq:
61.4
SEL:
97
SEL:
97
Dose:
5.4
Dose:
54.5
Proj. Dose:
43.6
Proj. Dose:
436
Threshold:
60
Threshold:
60
Criterion:
65
Criterion:
55
Exchange Rate:
3
Exchange Rate:
3
Min:
52.1
Min:
52.1
Min Occurred:
14- Sep -05 15:42:15
Min Occurred:
14- Sep -05 15:42:15
Max:
80.1
Max:
80.1
Max Occurred:
14- Sep -05 151523
Max Occurred:
14- Sep -05 15:15:23
Peak -1:
101.1
Peak -1:
101.1
Peak -1 Occurred:
14- Sep -05 151523
Peak -1 Occurrec14- Sep- 0515:15:23
Peak -2:
92.9
Peak -2:
92.9
Peak -2 Occurred:
14- Sep -05 150250
Peak -2 Occurrec 14- Sep -05 15:02:50
11.67
71.1
L10.00
647
133.33
60.6
L50.00
58.4
166.67
56.8
190.00
54.6
Detector:
Fast
Weighting:
A
SPL Exceedance L&60
Exceeded:
246 times
SPL Exceedance L&65
Exceeded:
157 times
Peak -1 Exceedance 55
Exceeded:
47 times
Peak -2 Exceedance 50
Exceeded:
1 times
Hysteresis:
2
Overloaded:
0
Pause Count:
0
Pause Time
0000.0
Calibrated:
14- Sep -05 14:57:31 PM
Offset:
0.01 dB
Checked:
14- Sep -05 14:57:31 PM
Level:
113.99 dB
Calibrator:
CAL200
Level:
114
Cal Record Count:
2
Sound Level Meter Summary
Translated :
5- Oct -05 11: 5214
190.00
55.1
Model Number:
814
Weighting:
A
Serial Number:
A0225
SPL Exceedance LevE65
times
Firmware Rev:
1.026
Peak -2 Exceedance
L 50
Software Version:
1.07
Overloaded:
0
Name:
Larson Davis 814
Calibrated:
23- Sep -05
Descr1:
Madison /Minneapolis
Calibrator:
CAL200
Descr2:
Acoustics and Noise
Setup:
KentSLM.slm
Setup Descr:
Kent MPCA Test Standard
Octave Filters:
1/1 Octave Filters, 1/3 Octave Filters
Location:
206 Roselawn 48F, 55 %RH,
winds calm, clear,
all noise from 35E
Note 1:
School busses on Roselawn
0, Hvy trucks 1
Note 2:
Overall Measurement
Current Measurement
Start Time
23- Sep -05 4:50:04
Start Time
45004
Elapsed Time
1:0013
Elapsed Time
1:0013
Leq:
44.8
Leq:
44.8
SEL:
81.3
SEL:
81.3
Dose:
0
Dose:
0.6
Proj. Dose:
0.6
Proj. Dose:
5.8
Threshold:
60
Threshold:
60
Criterion:
65
Criterion:
55
Exchange Rate:
3
Exchange Rate:
3
Min:
54.5
Min:
54.5
Min Occurred:
23- Sep -05 5:48:21
Min Occurred:
23- Sep -05 5:48:21
Max:
71.2
Max:
71.2
Max Occurred:
23- Sep -05 5:12:12
Max Occurred:
23- Sep -05 5:12:12
Peak -1:
87.1
Peak -1:
87.1
Peak -1 Occurred:
23- Sep -05 5:24:15
Peak -1 Occurred 23- Sep -05 5:24:15
Peak -2:
83.2
Peak -2:
83.2
Peak -2 Occurred:
23- Sep -05 5:10:44
Peak -2 Occurred 23- Sep -05 5:10:44
11.67
63.2
133.33 58.1
166.67
56
190.00
55.1
Detector:
Fast
Weighting:
A
SPL Exceedance LevE60
Exceeded:
SPL Exceedance LevE65
times
Peak -1 Exceedance
L 55
Peak -2 Exceedance
L 50
Hysteresis:
2
Overloaded:
0
Pause Count:
0
Calibrated:
23- Sep -05
Checked:
23- Sep -05
Calibrator:
CAL200
Cal Record Count:
1
Exceeded:
58
times
Exceeded:
25
times
Exceeded:
2823
times
Exceeded:
2
times
Pause Time
0000.0
4:40:29 Offset:
0
dB
4:40:29 Level:
114
dB
Level:
114
Sound Level Meter Summary
Translated :
4-Oct-05 132603
Model Number:
814
Serial Number:
A0225
Firmware Rev:
1.026
Software Version:
1.07
Name:
Larson Davis 814
Descr1:
Madison /Minneapolis
Descr2:
Acoustics and Noise
Setup:
KentSLM.slm
Setup Descr:
Kent MPCA Test Standard
Octave Filters:
1/1 Octave Filters, 1/3 Octave Filters
Location:
151 E Roselawn
Note 1:
75F, winds calm, 62 %RH
Note 2:
60 school busses along Roselawn,Hvy Trucks 5, 1 airliner pass
Overall Measurement
Current Measurement
Start Time
14- Sep -05 16:02:21
Start Time
160221
Elapsed Time
1:0004
Elapsed Time
1:0004
Leq:
59.9
Leq:
59.9
SEL:
95.6
SEL:
95.6
Dose:
4
Dose:
39.5
Proj. Dose:
30.8
Proj. Dose:
307
Threshold:
60
Threshold:
60
Criterion:
65
Criterion:
55
Exchange Rate:
3
Exchange Rate :3
Min:
50.2
Min:
50.2
Min Occurred:
14- Sep -05 16:57:11
Min Occurred:
14- Sep -05 16:57:11
Max:
80.5
Max:
80.5
Max Occurred:
14- Sep -05 16:45:38
Max Occurred:
14- Sep -05 16:45:38
Peak -1:
106.2
Peak -1:
106.2
Peak -1 Occurred:
14- Sep -05 16:09:52
Peak -1 Occurrec14- Sep- 0516:09:52
Peak -2:
96.2
Peak -2:
96.2
Peak -2 Occurred:
14- Sep -05 16:39:31
Peak -2 Occurrec 14- Sep -05 16:39:31
11.67
70.2
L10.00
63.8
133.33
58.9
L50.00
56.8
166.67
54.7
190.00
52
Detector:
Fast
Weighting:
A
SPL Exceedance Level 1:
60
Exceeded:
443 times
SPL Exceedance Level 2:
65
Exceeded:
165 times
Peak -1 Exceedance Leve
55
Exceeded:
4300 times
Peak -2 Exceedance Leve
50
Exceeded:
1 times
Hysteresis:
2
Overloaded:
0
Pause Count:
0
Pause Time
0000.0
Calibrated:
14- Sep -05 15:59:45 PM
Offset:
0.3 dB
Checked:
14- Sep -05 15:59:45 PM
Level:
113.7 dB
Calibrator:
CAL200
Level:
114
Cal Record Count:
2
Sound Level Meter Summary
Translated: 4- Oct -05 143359
Model Number: 814
Serial Number: A0225
Firmware Rev:
1.026
Software Version:
1.07
Name:
Larson Davis 814
Descr1:
Madison /Minneapolis
Descr2:
Acoustics and Noise
Setup:
KentSLM.slm
Setup Descr:
Kent MPCA Test Standard
Octave Filters:
1/1 Octave Filters, 1/3 Octave Filters
Location:
151 Roselawn, 58F, 62 %RH, winds calm, clear
Note 1:
Most noise from 35E, total busses Roselawn 2, Hvy Trucks 3
Note 2
Overall Measurement
Current Measurement
Start Time
21- Sep -05
4:53:01
Start Time 45301
Elapsed Time
1:0018
Elapsed Time 1:0018
Leq:
52.9
Leq: 52.9
SEL:
87.9
67
SEL: 87.9
Dose:
0.7
21
Dose: 6.7
Proj. Dose:
6.3
1242
Proj. Dose: 62.4
Threshold:
60
1
Threshold: 60
Criterion:
65
Criterion: 55
Exchange Rate:
3
Exchange Rate: 3
Min:
51.7
0000.0
Min: 51.7
Min Occurred:
21- Sep -05
5:08:37
Min Occurred: 21- Sep -05 5:08:37
Max:
75
113.8
Max: 75
Max Occurred:
21- Sep -05
5:53:11
Max Occurred: 21- Sep -05 5:53:11
Peak -1:
100
Peak -1: 100
Peak -1 Occurred:
21- Sep -05
5:19:52
Peak -1 Occurrec21- Sep -05 5:19:52
Peak -2:
87.7
Peak -2: 87.7
Peak -2 Occurred:
21- Sep -05
5:53:51
Peak -2 Occurrec 21 -Sep-05 5:53:51
11.67
63.9
133.33 57.4
166.67 55.7
190.00 54
Detector: Fast
Weighting: A
SPL Exceedance Level 160
Exceeded:
67
times
SPL Exceedance Level 265
Exceeded:
21
times
Peak -1 Exceedance Levf55
Exceeded:
1242
times
Peak -2 Exceedance Levf50
Exceeded:
1
times
Hysteresis: 2
Overloaded: 0
Pause Count: 0
Pause Time
0000.0
Calibrated: 21- Sep -05
4:50:46 Offset:
0.2
dB
Checked: 21- Sep -05
4:50:46 Level:
113.8
dB
Calibrator: CAL200
Level:
114
Cal Record Count: 4
Sound Level Meter Summary
Translated :
4- Oct -05 13 : 5451
Model Number:
814
Serial Number:
A0225
Firmware Rev:
1.026
Software Version:
1.07
83
times
Name:
Larson Davis 814
13
times
Descr1:
Madison /Minneapolis
6414
times
Descr2:
Acoustics and Noise
1
times
Setup:
KentSLM.slm
Setup Descr:
Kent MPCA Test Standard
Octave Filters:
1/1 Octave Filters, 1/3 Octave Filters
0000.0
Location:
150 Downs Ave
155546 Offset:
0
Note 1:
78F, winds light from west at 4 -5mph,
67 %, clear
114
Note 2:
55 total school busses, 5 Hvy trucks,
1 Airliner, 3 City
trucks
Overall Measurement
Cal Record Count: 2
Current Measurement
Start Time
15- Sep -05 160236
Start Time
160236
Elapsed Time
1:0012
Elapsed Time
1:0012
Leq:
43
Leq:
43
SEL:
79.4
SEL:
79.4
Dose:
0.1
Dose:
0.9
Proj. Dose:
0.6
Proj. Dose:
6.3
Threshold:
60
Threshold:
60
Criterion:
65
Criterion:
55
Exchange Rate:
3
Exchange Rate:
3
Min:
50.8
Min:
50.8
Min Occurred:
15- Sep -05 165357
Min Occurred:
15- Sep -05 16:53:57
Max:
71.1
Max:
71.1
Max Occurred:
15- Sep -05 161659
Max Occurred:
15- Sep -05 16:16:59
Peak -1:
90.5
Peak -1:
90.5
Peak -1 Occurred:
15- Sep -05 165020
Peak -1 Occurred:
15- Sep- 0516:50:20
Peak -2:
85.2
Peak -2:
85.2
Peak -2 Occurred:
15- Sep -05 1641:59
Peak -2 Occurred:
15- Sep -05 1641:59
11.67
59.1
133.33 54.1
166.67 53.1
190.00 52.4
Detector: Fast
Weighting: A
SPL Exceedance Level 1 60
Exceeded:
83
times
SPL Exceedance Level 2 65
Exceeded:
13
times
Peak -1 Exceedance Leve55
Exceeded:
6414
times
Peak -2 Exceedance Leve50
Exceeded:
1
times
Hysteresis: 2
Overloaded: 0
Pause Count: 0
Pause Time
0000.0
Calibrated: 21- Sep -05
155546 Offset:
0
dB
Checked: 21- Sep -05
155546 Level:
114
dB
Calibrator: CAL200
Level:
114
Cal Record Count: 2
Sound Level Meter Summary
Translated :
5-Oct-05 11: 0244
Model Number:
814
Serial Number:
A0225
Firmware Rev:
1.026
Software Version:
1.07
Name:
Larson Davis 814
Descr1:
Madison /Minneapolis
Descr2:
Acoustics and Noise
Setup:
KentSLM.slm
Setup Descr:
Kent MPCA Test Standard
Octave Filters:
1/1 Octave Filters, 1/3 Octave
Filters
Location:
150 Downs Ave, 59F, 61 %RH,
winds calm, most
noise from 35E
Note 1:
School busses on Roselawn 66, Hvy trucks 9
Note 2:
Overall Measurement
Current Measurement
Start Time
23- Sep -05 5:53:59
Start Time
55359
Elapsed Time
1:0257
Elapsed Time
1:0257
Leq:
41.5
Leq:
41.5
SEL:
77.3
SEL:
77.3
Dose:
0
Dose:
0.6
Proj. Dose:
0.4
Proj. Dose:
4.5
Threshold:
60
Threshold:
60
Criterion:
65
Criterion:
55
Exchange Rate:
3
Exchange Rate:
3
Min:
52.5
Min:
52.5
Min Occurred:
23- Sep -05 6:52:43
Min Occurred:
23- Sep -05 6:52:43
Max:
68.5
Max:
68.5
Max Occurred:
23- Sep -05 6:06:28
Max Occurred:
23- Sep -05 6:06:28
Peak -1:
85.1
Peak -1:
85.1
Peak -1 Occurred:
23- Sep -05 6:21:01
Peak -1 Occurred 23- Sep -05 6:21:01
Peak -2:
81.1
Peak -2:
81.1
Peak -2 Occurred:
23- Sep -05 6:06:28
Peak -2 Occurred 23- Sep -05 6:06:28
11.67
59.3
L10.00
577
133.33
56.5
L50.00
55:9
166.67
55
190.00
54.2
Detector:
Fast
Weighting:
A
SPL Exceedance Level
1 60
Exceeded:
49 times
SPL Exceedance Level
2 65
Exceeded:
15 times
Peak -1 Exceedance Leve55
Exceeded:
2426 times
Peak -2 Exceedance Leve50
Exceeded:
1 times
Hysteresis:
2
Overloaded:
0
Pause Count:
0
Pause Time
0000.0
Calibrated:
23- Sep -05 5:50:56
Offset:
0 dB
Checked:
23- Sep -05 5:50:56
Level:
114 dB
Calibrator:
CAL200
Level:
114
Cal Record Count:
2
Sound Level Meter Summary
Translated :
4-Oct-05 140517
Model Number:
814
Serial Number:
A0225
Firmware Rev:
1.026
Software Version:
1.07
181
times
Name:
Larson Davis 814
296
times
Descr1:
Madison /Minneapolis
245
times
Descr2:
Acoustics and Noise
1
times
Setup:
KentSLM.slm
Setup Descr:
Kent MPCA Test Standard
Octave Filters:
1/1 Octave Filters, 1/3 Octave Filters
0000.0
Location:
106 Roselawn Winds 10mph, 76F, 64
%RH, clear
dB
Note 1:
59 school bus passes, 18Hvy Trucks,
busses turning west on Jackson 11
Note 2:
Calibrator: CAL200
Level:
114
Overall Measurement
Cal Record Count: 2
Current Measurement
Start Time
19- Sep -05 160224
Start Time
160224
Elapsed Time
1:0021
Elapsed Time
1:00:21
Leq:
66.4
Leq:
66.4
SEL:
102.2
SEL:
102.2
Dose:
18.1
Dose:
180.5
Proj. Dose:
137.5
Proj. Dose:
1376
Threshold:
60
Threshold:
60
Criterion:
65
Criterion:
55
Exchange Rate:
3
Exchange Rate
Min:
51.7
Min:
51.7
Min Occurred:
19- Sep -05 162053
Min Occurred:
19- Sep -05 16:20:53
Max:
82.7
Max:
82.7
Max Occurred:
19- Sep -05 163247
Max Occurred:
19- Sep -05 16:32:47
Peak -1:
114.4
Peak -1:
114.4
Peak -1 Occurred:
19- Sep -05 162207
Peak -1 OccurrE19- Sep- 0516:22:07
Peak -2:
112.1
Peak -2:
112.1
Peak -2 Occurred:
19- Sep -05 162207
Peak -2 OccurrE 19- Sep -05 162207
11.67
75.6
133.33 64.9
166.67 59.3
190.00 54.5
Detector: Fast
Weighting: A
SPL Exceedance Level 1: 60
Exceeded:
181
times
SPL Exceedance Level 2: 65
Exceeded:
296
times
Peak -1 Exceedance Level: 55
Exceeded:
245
times
Peak -2 Exceedance Level 50
Exceeded:
1
times
Hysteresis: 2
Overloaded: 0
Pause Count: 0
Pause Time
0000.0
Calibrated: 19- Sep -05
155446 Offset:
0.2
dB
Checked: 19- Sep -05
155446 Level:
113.8
dB
Calibrator: CAL200
Level:
114
Cal Record Count: 2
Sound Level Meter Summary
Translated :
5-Oct-05 12 2 435
190.00
53.5
Model Number:
814
Weighting:
A
Serial Number:
A0225
SPL Exceedance Level 2:
65
Firmware Rev:
1.026
Peak -2 Exceedance Level:
50
Software Version:
1.07
Overloaded:
0
Name:
Larson Davis 814
Calibrated:
21- Sep -05
Descr1:
Madison /Minneapolis
Calibrator:
CAL200
Descr2:
Acoustics and Noise
Setup:
KentSLM.slm
Setup Descr:
Kent MPCA Test Standard
Octave Filters:
1/1 Octave Filters, 1/3 Octave Filters
Location:
106 Roselawn 52 %RH, 48F,
no winds, all noise from
Roselawn
Note 1:
School busses 58, Hvy Trucks 12
Note 2:
Overall Measurement
Current Measurement
Start Time
21- Sep -05 6:05:12
Start Time
60512
Elapsed Time
1:0054
Elapsed Time
1:0054
Leq:
63.1
Leq:
63.1
SEL:
98.9
SEL:
98.9
Dose:
0.7
Dose:
6.7
Proj. Dose:
64
Proj. Dose:
638
Threshold:
60
Threshold:
60
Criterion:
65
Criterion:
55
Exchange Rate:
3
Exchange Rate:
3
Min:
51.8
Min:
51.8
Min Occurred:
21- Sep -05 6:08:37
Min Occurred:
21- Sep -05 6:08:37
Max:
86.9
Max:
86.9
Max Occurred:
21- Sep -05 6:53:51
Max Occurred:
21- Sep -05 6:53:51
Peak -1:
107.8
Peak -1:
107.8
Peak -1 Occurred:
21- Sep -05 6:19:52
Peak -1 Occurred:
21- Sep -05 6:19:52
Peak -2:
102.9
Peak -2:
102.9
Peak -2 Occurred:
21- Sep -05 6:53:51
Peak -2 Occurred:
21- Sep -05 6:53:51
11.67
73.3
133.33 60.2
166.67
55.2
190.00
53.5
Detector:
Fast
Weighting:
A
SPL Exceedance Level 1:
60
SPL Exceedance Level 2:
65
Peak -1 Exceedance Level:
55
Peak -2 Exceedance Level:
50
Hysteresis:
2
Overloaded:
0
Pause Count:
0
Calibrated:
21- Sep -05
Checked:
21- Sep -05
Calibrator:
CAL200
Cal Record Count:
2
Exceeded:
170
times
Exceeded:
157
times
Exceeded:
373
times
Exceeded:
1
times
Pause Time
0000.0
6:03:46 Offset:
0.8
dB
6:03:46 Level:
113.2
Level:
114
Sound Level Meter Summary
Translated
25-Oct-05 103248
190.00
55.8
Detector:
Model Number:
814
A
SPL Exceedance Level 1:
60
Serial Number:
A0225
Peak -1 Exceedance Level:
55
Peak -2 Exceedance Level:
Firmware Rev:
1.026
2
Overloaded:
0
Software Version:
1.07
Calibrated:
21- Oct -05
Checked:
Name:
Larson Davis 814
CAL200
Cal Record Count:
2
Descr1:
Madison /Minneapolis
Descr2:
Acoustics and Noise
Setup:
KentSLM.slm
Setup Descr:
Kent MPCA Test Standard
Octave Filters:
1/1 Octave Filters, 1/3 Octave
Filters
Location:
106 Roselawn MEA Week (supposed
to be light bus activity), 54F,
58 %RH, winds calm, sunny
Note 1:
Noise from 35E evident, 5 bus
passes
Note 2:
1- 18 wheeler passes
Overall Measurement
Current Measurement
Start Time
21- Oct -05 403:16
Start Time
403:16
Elapsed Time
1:01:33
Elapsed Time
1:01:33
Leq:
61.1
Leq:
61.1
SEL:
96.2
SEL:
96.2
Dose:
4.1
Dose:
41
Proj. Dose:
32.1
Proj. Dose:
321
Threshold:
60
Threshold:
60
Criterion:
65
Criterion:
55
Exchange Rate:
3
Exchange Rate:
3
Min:
54.6
Min:
54.6
Min Occurred:
21- Oct -05 4:1244
Min Occurred:
21- Oct -05
4:1244
Max:
85
Max:
85
Max Occurred:
21- Oct -05 43521
Max Occurred:
21- Oct -05
43521
Peak -1:
102
Peak -1:
102
Peak -1 Occurred:
21- Oct -05 450:19
Peak -1 Occurred:
21- Oct -05
450:19
Peak -2:
97.5
Peak -2:
97.5
Peak -2 Occurred:
21- Oct -05 45201
Peak -2 Occurred:
21- Oct -05
45201
11.67
69.1
133.33 59.5
166.67
56.8
190.00
55.8
Detector:
Fast
Weighting:
A
SPL Exceedance Level 1:
60
SPL Exceedance Level 2:
65
Peak -1 Exceedance Level:
55
Peak -2 Exceedance Level:
50
Hysteresis:
2
Overloaded:
0
Pause Count:
0
Calibrated:
21- Oct -05
Checked:
21- Oct -05
Calibrator:
CAL200
Cal Record Count:
2
Exceeded:
221
times
Exceeded:
183
times
Exceeded:
1929
times
Exceeded:
3
times
Pause Time
0000.0
1556:17 Offset:
0
dB
1556:17 Level:
114
dB
Level:
114
Sound Level Meter Summary
Translated :
25-Oct-05 11: 0008
190.00 54.6
Model Number:
814
Detector: Fast
Serial Number:
A0225
Weighting: A
Firmware Rev:
1.026
Exceeded:
133
times
Software Version:
1.07
106
times
Peak -1 Exceedance Leve55
Name:
Larson Davis 814
times
Peak -2 Exceedance Leve50
Exceeded:
Descr1:
Madison /Minneapolis
Hysteresis: 2
Descr2:
Acoustics and Noise
Setup:
KentSLM.slm
0000.0
Calibrated: 20- Oct -05
Setup Descr:
Kent MPCA Test Standard
dB
Checked: 20- Oct -05
55828 Level:
Octave Filters:
1/1 Octave Filters, 1/3 Octave Filters
Calibrator: CAL200
Level:
Location:
106 Roselawn MEA Week (supposed
to be light bus activity, 37F, 52 %RH, winds calm
Note 1:
Noise from 35E evident, 7 bus
passes, plane pass at 6:54
Note 2:
2- 18 wheeler passes
Overall Measurement
Current Measurement
Start Time
20- Oct -05 601:32
Start Time
601:32
Elapsed Time
1:01:02
Elapsed Time
1:01:02
Leq:
59.1
Leq:
59.1
SEL:
94.7
SEL:
94.7
Dose:
3.2
Dose:
32
Proj. Dose:
25.8
Proj. Dose:
258
Threshold:
60
Threshold:
60
Criterion:
65
Criterion:
55
Exchange Rate:
3
Exchange Rate:
3
Min:
52.2
Min:
52.2
Min Occurred:
20- Oct -05 60832
Min Occurred:
20- Oct -05
6:08:32
Max:
81
Max:
81
Max Occurred:
20- Oct -05 64333
Max Occurred:
20- Oct -05
6:43:33
Peak -1:
101
Peak -1:
101
Peak -1 Occurred:
20- Oct -05 64332
Peak -1 Occurred:
20- Oct -05
6:43:32
Peak -2:
95.5
Peak -2:
95.5
Peak -2 Occurred:
20- Oct -05 64332
Peak -2 Occurred:
20- Oct -05
64332
11.67
68.7
133.33 58.4
166.67 56
190.00 54.6
Detector: Fast
Weighting: A
SPL Exceedance Level 1 60
Exceeded:
133
times
SPL Exceedance Level 2 65
Exceeded:
106
times
Peak -1 Exceedance Leve55
Exceeded:
1752
times
Peak -2 Exceedance Leve50
Exceeded:
1
times
Hysteresis: 2
Overloaded: 0
Pause Count: 0
Pause Time
0000.0
Calibrated: 20- Oct -05
55828 Offset:
0
dB
Checked: 20- Oct -05
55828 Level:
114
dB
Calibrator: CAL200
Level:
114
Cal Record Count: 3
SEH MEMORANDUM
TO: Tom Sohrweide, PE
FROM: Thomas A. Henning, PE
DATE: November 1, 2005
RE: Roselawn Air Sampling Results
INTRODUCTION
This memorandum summarizes the results of ambient air quality sampling performed by SEH on
September 20, 2005. SEH placed a summa canister at the southeast corner of Roselawn Avenue and
Jackson Street, within the property line of 106 East Roselawn Avenue. The canister collected an ambient
air sample beginning at 9:53 am and ending at 6:01 pm. Weather conditions during the sampling day
were clear and sunny with light winds from the west at 2 -5 knots. After sampling the canister was stored
overnight and then released into the custody of Pace Analytical, St. Paul, Minnesota, at 1:34 pm on
September 21 '.
EVALUATION OF RESULTS
Pace Analytical analyzed the sample to identify which pollutants were quantifiable. The results of the
analysis are attached. Of the 58 compounds tested for, only two, acetone and methylene chloride were
detected in the sample (see pages 4 and 5 of 13 in the Pace Analytical Report). The other 56 compounds
were not detected. The measured concentrations of acetone and methylene chloride are relatively low, 5.3
and 3.7 parts per billion by volume (ppbv).
SOURCE OF DETECTED COMPOUNDS
The source of these compounds is not known, although it is likely not from exhaust from diesel engines.
Diesel exhaust typically contains benzene, propylene, toluene and xylene. None of these compounds
were detected in the sample. In addition, acetone and methylene chloride are not listed as constituents of
diesel engine exhaust (see U.S. EPA's Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, AP -42, Section
3.3).
Both acetone and methylene chloride are common laboratory solvents. It is possible that the ambient
sample was contaminated with these compounds in the laboratory, however the blank sample run by Pace
Analytical to help determine if contamination has occurred does not show acetone or methylene chloride
as detected (see pages 7 and 8 of 13 in the Pace Analytical report).
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) operates air toxics ambient air quality monitors at
multiple locations in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Acetone and methylene chloride are typically
detected at these monitors. Table I compares the measured concentrations with peak concentrations of
these compounds detected at MPCA monitors located at three locations in St. Paul: Holman Field,
Harding High School (East 6th Street), and the Ross Avenue Fire Station.
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 809 North 8 Street, Suite 205, Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081
SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehincxom 1 920.452.6603 1 920.452.6035 fax
Tom Sohrweide
November 1, 2005
Page 2
In general, the measured concentrations of acetone and methylene chloride are higher than the MPCA
monitoring data. However, the measured concentrations are the same order of magnitude.
COMPARISON WITH HEALTH STANDARDS
The measured concentrations of acetone and methylene chloride are well below health standard
benchmarks. On Table 2 we compare the measured concentrations with their respective Threshold Limit
Values (TLVs), which are exposure thresholds published by the American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists ( ACGIH). The TLVs represent conditions under which the ACGIH believes that
nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed without adverse health effects. As shown in Table 2, the
concentrations measured at the Roselawn site are well below their respective TLVs.
The measured concentrations are also compared to health benchmarks in Table 2. Health benchmarks
represent air concentrations below which there is little appreciable risk of harmful effects on humans.
Sources of health benchmarks are the Minnesota Department of Health, Health Risk Values and the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). The measured
methylene chloride concentration is below the chronic health benchmark. There is no benchmark
established for acetone.
Attachment I — Pace Analytical Report dated October 10, 2005
Table I — Analytical Results Compared to MPCA Monitored Data
Table 2 — Analytical Results Compared to Threshold Limit Values (TLVs)
Table 1
Roselawn Air Quality Sampling
Comparison to MPCA Monitored Data
Location
Maximum Concentrations (ppm)
Acetone
Methylene Chloride
CAS No. 67 -64 -1
CAS No. 75 -09 -2
1
0.0030
0.0133
2
0.0015
0.00023
3
0.0029
0.0017
Roselawn
0.0053
0.0037
Notes
1. Location 1: Holman Field in St. Paul (years monitored: 1995 to 2004)
2. Location 2: Harding High School in St. Paul (years monitored: 1998 -199!
3. Location 3: Ross Ave. Fire Station in St. Paul (years monitored: 1998-
2004 (acetone), 1991 -2004 (methylene chloride)
Table 2
Roselawn Air Quality Sampling
Analytical Results Compared to Threshold Limit Values (TLVs)
Substance
CAS No.
Monitored Value
TLV -TWA
%ofTWA
Health Benchmarks
Acetone
67 -64 -1
5.3 ppb (0.0053 ppm)
500 ppm
0.0011%
NA
Methylene Chloride
(Dichloromethane)
75 -09 -2
3.7 ppb (0.0037 ppm)
50 ppm
0.007%
0.0058 ppm (20 ug/m')
1. Sample taken over 8 -hour averaging period.
2. TLV -TWA is the Threshold Limit Value-Time Weighted Average. This value represents conditions under which the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)
believes that nearly all workers may be repeatedly exosed without adverse health effects for someone working 8 hours per day, 40 hours per week for their working lifetime.
3. Health benchmarks represent air concentrations below which there is little appreciable risk of harmful effects on humans. Sources of health benchmarks are the Minnesota Department of
Health, Health Risk Values and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Number shown represents chronic benchmark- where the
concentration shown would need to be injested over an entire lifetime.
;Ze Analytical v `
vvW , )dG&l.EbtS rn
October 10. 2005
Kent Peterson
Short, Elliott, & Hendrickson
3535 Vadnais Ctr. Drive
Saint Paul. MN 55110
RE: Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Dear Kent Peterson:
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on September
21, 2005. Results reported herein conform to the most current NELAC standards, where
applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the report.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Daryl Peterson
daryl.peterson @pacelabs.com
Illinois Certification #: 200011
Iowa Certification #: 368
Minnesota Certification #: 027 - 053 -137
Wisconsin Certification #: 999407970
Enclosures
Page 1 of 13
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
withoutthe written consent of P�+acceenAnalytical Services, Inc.
1 I'ela '
;Ze Analytical v `
VkWY�{)dG& /.EftS.G4rR
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received
1020153001 RL001 Air 0920/0518:01 0921/0513:34
Page 2 of 13
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
withoutthe written consent of P�+acceenAnalytical Services, Inc.
1 I'ela '
;Ze Analytical v `
VkWY�ftdG&�.EftS.G4rR
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
Lab ID
Sample ID
Method
Analytes
Reported
1020153001
RL001
TO -15
57
Page 3 of 13
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
withoutthe written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2 ce Analytical " a
VkWY�{)dG& /.EftS.G4rR
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
The results are reported as received by the laboratory.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
Lab ID: 1020153001 Date Collected: 0920/05 18:01 Matrix: Air
Sample ID: RL001 Date Received: 0921/05 13:34
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared By Analyzed By CAS No.
Air
T015 MSVAIR Analytical Method: TO -15
Acetone
5.3 ppbv
1.9
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
67 -64 -1
Benzene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
71 -43 -2
Bromodichloromethane
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
75 -27 -4
Bromoform
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
75 -25 -2
Bromomethane
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
74 -83 -9
1,3- Butadiene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
106 -99 -0
2- Butanone (MEK)
ND ppbv
1.9
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
78 -93 -3
Carbon disulfide
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
75 -15 -0
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
56 -23 -5
Chlorobenzene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
108 -90 -7
Chloroethane
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
75 -00 -3
Chloroform
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
67 -66 -3
Chloromethane
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
74 -87 -3
Cyclohexane
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
110 -82 -7
Dibromochloromethane
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
124 -48 -1
1,2- Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
106 -93 -4
1,2- Dichlorobenzene
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
95 -50 -1
1,3- Dichlorobenzene
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
541 -73 -1
1,4- Dichlorobenzene
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
106 -46 -7
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
75 -71 -8
1,1- Dichloroethane
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/0502:36
PMW
75 -34 -3
1,2- Dichloroethane
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
107 -06 -2
1,1- Dichloroethene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/0502:36
PMW
75 -35 -4
cis- 1,2- Dichloroethene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
156 -59 -2
trans -1,2 -Dich loroethene
ND ppbv
3.4
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
156 -60 -5
1,2- Dichloropropane
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
78 -87 -5
cis -1,3- Dichloropropen a
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
10061 -01 -5
trans -1,3 -Dich loropropen a
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
10061 -02 -6
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
ND ppbv
1.9
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
76 -14 -2
Ethyl acetate
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
141 -78 -6
Ethylbenzene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
100 -41 -4
4- Ethyltoluene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
622 -96 -8
n- Heptane
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
142 -82 -5
Hexachlorc -1,3- butadiene
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
87 -68 -3
n- Hexane
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
110 -54 -3
2- Hexanone
ND ppbv
1.9
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
591 -78 -6
Methylene Chloride
3.7 ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
75 -09 -2
�F.I[afi[t7i[t7YAPb7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
1 I'ela '
Qual Regl-mt
Page 4 of 13
2 ce Analytical " a
VkWY�{)dG& /.EftS.G4rR
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
The results are reported as received by the laboratory
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
Lab ID: 1020153001
Sample ID: RL001
Parameters
Results Units
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Report Limit
0920/05 18:01
0921/05 13:34
DF Prepared
Matrix: Air
By Analyzed
By
CAS No. Qual Regl-mt
4- Methyl -2- pentanone
ND ppbv
1.9
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
108 -10 -1
(MIBK)
Methyl -tert -butyl ether
ND ppbv
3.4
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
1634 -04 -4
Propylene
ND ppbv
6.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
115 -07 -1
Styrene
ND ppbv
1.9
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
100 -42 -5
1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/0502:36
PMW
79 -34 -5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
127 -18 -4
Tetrahydrofuran
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
109 -99 -9
Toluene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
108 -88 -3
1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
120 -82 -1
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/0502:36
PMW
71 -55 -6
1,1,2 - Trichloroethane
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/0502:36
PMW
79 -00 -5
Trichloroethene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
79 -01 -6
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
75 -69 -4
1,1,2-
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/0502:36
PMW
76 -13 -1
Tri ch lorotrifl u oroeth an e
1,2,4 - Trimethylbenzene
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
95 -63 -6
1,3,5 - Trimethylbenzene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
108 -67 -8
Vinyl acetate
ND ppbv
1.9
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
108 -05 -4
Vinyl chloride
ND ppbv
1.7
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
75 -01 -4
m &p-Xylene
ND ppbv
3.4
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
1330 -20 -7
c- Xylene
ND ppbv
1.8
3.41
10/07/05 02:36
PMW
95 -47 -6
Date: 10/10/2005 Page 5 of 13
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
1 I'ela '
2 ce Analytical ' S
VkWY�{)dG&�.EftS.G4rR
ANALYTICAL RESULTS QUALIFIERS
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
PARAMETER QUALIFIERS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample
preparation, dilution of the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL- Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S - Surrogate
�F.I[afi[t7i[t7YAPb7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
withoutthe written consent of P�+acceenAnalytical Services, Inc.
1 I'ela '
Page 6 of 13
;Ze Analytical v `
VkWY�{)dG& /.EftS.G4rR
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
QC Batch: AIR/2747 Analysis Method: TO -15
QC Batch Method: TO -15 Analysis Description: T015 MSVAIR
Associated Lab Samples: 1020065003 1020097001 1020105001 1020153001
METHOD BLANK: 143787
Associated Lab Samples: 1020153001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Qualifiers
1,1- Dichloroethane
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,1- Dichloroethene
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,1,2 - Trichloroethane
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,2- Dichlorobenzene
ppbv
ND
0.51
1,2- Dichloroethane
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,2- Dibromoethane (EDB)
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,2- Dichloropropane
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,2,4 - Trimethylbenzene
ppbv
ND
0.51
1,3- Butadiene
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,3- Dichlorobenzene
ppbv
ND
0.51
1,3,5 - Trimethylbenzene
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,4- Dichlorobenzene
ppbv
ND
0.51
2- Butanone (MEK)
ppbv
ND
0.55
2- Hexanone
ppbv
ND
0.55
4- Ethyltoluene
ppbv
ND
0.53
Carbon disulfide
ppbv
ND
0.50
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
ppbv
ND
0.57
Acetone
ppbv
ND
0.55
Benzene
ppbv
ND
0.52
Bromodichloromethane
ppbv
ND
0.51
Bromomethane
ppbv
ND
0.51
Bromoform
ppbv
ND
0.52
cis- 1,2- Dichloroethene
ppbv
ND
0.52
cis -1,3- Dichloropropen a
ppbv
ND
0.51
Carbon tetrachloride
ppbv
ND
0.51
Cyclohexane
ppbv
ND
0.52
Chlorobenzene
ppbv
ND
0.52
Chloroethane
ppbv
ND
0.51
Chloroform
ppbv
ND
0.51
Chloromethane
ppbv
ND
0.50
Dibromochloromethane
ppbv
ND
0.53
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ppbv
ND
0.51
Ethyl acetate
ppbv
ND
0.51
Ethylbenzene
ppbv
ND
0.52
Hexachlorc -1,3- butadiene
ppbv
ND
0.50
Methylene Chloride
ppbv
ND
0.52
Date: 10/10/2005
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
1 I'ela '
Page 7 of 13
;Ze Analytical v `
VkWY�{)dG&�.EftS.G4rR
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
Parameter
Blank Reporting
Units Result Limit Qualifiers
Methyl -tert -butyl ether
ppbv
ND
1.0
4- Methyl -2- pentanone (MIBK)
ppbv
ND
0.55
m &p-Xylene
ppbv
ND
1.0
n- Heptane
ppbv
ND
0.52
n- Hexane
ppbv
ND
0.53
c- Xylene
ppbv
ND
0.52
Propylene
ppbv
ND
2.0
Styrene
ppbv
ND
0.55
trans -1,2 -Dich loroethene
ppbv
ND
1.0
trans -1,3 -Dich loropropen a
ppbv
ND
0.52
Tetrachloroethene
ppbv
ND
0.52
Tetrahydrofuran
ppbv
ND
0.52
1,1,2- Trichlorotrifluoroethane
ppbv
ND
0.52
Toluene
ppbv
ND
0.52
Trichloroethene
ppbv
ND
0.52
Trichlorofluoromethane
ppbv
ND
0.50
Vinyl acetate
ppbv
ND
0.55
Vinyl chloride
ppbv
ND
0.51
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 143788
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
1,1- Dichloroethane
ppbv
10.7
9.5
88
59 -136
1,1- Dichloroethene
ppbv
10.8
9.0
83
60 -137
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
ppbv
10.6
9.3
88
60 -134
1,1,2 - Trichloroethane
ppbv
10.7
8.9
83
64 -129
1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane
ppbv
10.6
9.3
87
55 -141
1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene
ppbv
10.4
8.7
83
50 -150
1,2- Dichlorobenzene
ppbv
10.4
9.2
89
60 -139
1,2- Dichloroethane
ppbv
10.6
9.6
90
56 -141
1,2- Dibromoethane (EDB)
ppbv
10.5
9.5
90
61 -136
1,2- Dichloropropane
ppbv
10.5
9.0
86
57 -131
1,2,4 - Trimethylbenzene
ppbv
10.4
8.4
81
63 -137
1,3- Butadiene
ppbv
10.7
8.8
83
53 -140
1,3- Dichlorobenzene
ppbv
10.5
9.7
93
59 -136
1,3,5 - Trimethylbenzene
ppbv
10.4
8.7
83
61 -134
1,4- Dichlorobenzene
ppbv
10.5
9.0
86
59 -130
2- Butanone (MEK)
ppbv
10.4
9.9
95
54 -133
2- Hexanone
ppbv
10.4
9.2
88
54 -139
4- Ethyltoluene
ppbv
10.3
9.4
91
61 -138
Carbon disulfide
ppbv
10.4
10.8
104
50 -150
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
ppbv
9.9
8.6
87
59 -130
IkImillIGillylo b7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
1 I'ela '
Page 8 of 13
;Ze Analytical v `
VkWY�{)dG&�.EftS.G4rR
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 143788
Parameter
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Acetone
ppbv
10.3
9.9
96
50 -139
Benzene
ppbv
10.6
9.3
88
64 -125
Bromodichloromethane
ppbv
10.4
9.0
87
61 -131
Bromomethane
ppbv
10.1
8.2
81
55 -135
Bromoform
ppbv
10.4
9.5
91
66 -138
cis- 1,2- Dichloroethene
ppbv
10.7
9.6
89
62 -135
cis -1,3- Dichloropropen a
ppbv
10.5
9.4
90
64 -133
Carbon tetrachloride
ppbv
10.7
9.8
91
58 -135
Cyclohexane
ppbv
10.2
9.1
89
54 -139
Chlorobenzene
ppbv
10.6
9.3
88
62 -139
Chloroethane
ppbv
10
8.6
86
56 -140
Chloroform
ppbv
9.8
8.9
90
50 -150
Chloromethane
ppbv
9.9
8.1
82
56 -144
Dibromochloromethane
ppbv
10.4
9.8
94
50 -150
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ppbv
10.1
10.1
100
60 -130
Ethyl acetate
ppbv
9.8
7.7
79
60 -132
Ethylbenzene
ppbv
10.5
8.3
79
65 -140
Hexachlorc -1,3- butadiene
ppbv
10.4
9.0
87
50 -150
Methylene Chloride
ppbv
10.8
8.4
77
56 -138
Methyl -tert -butyl ether
ppbv
10.2
9.4
92
50 -150
4- Methyl -2- pentanone (MIBK)
ppbv
10.4
9.8
94
53 -139
m &p-Xylene
ppbv
20.8
16.3
78
60 -132
n- Heptane
ppbv
10.2
9.0
88
62 -135
n- Hexane
ppbv
10.1
8.7
86
62 -134
c- Xylene
ppbv
10.6
8.1
76
64 -132
Propylene
ppbv
10.6
9.5
89
56 -125
Styrene
ppbv
10.5
8.4
80
69 -134
trans -1,2 -Dich loroethene
ppbv
10
9.1
91
50 -150
trans -1,3 -Dich loropropen a
ppbv
11
9.5
86
70 -142
Tetrachloroethene
ppbv
10.5
8.5
81
60 -137
Tetrahydrofuran
ppbv
10.2
8.8
86
52 -139
1,1,2- Trichlorotrifluoroethane
ppbv
10.9
8.9
81
55 -137
Toluene
ppbv
10.6
10.8
102
69 -130
Trichloroethene
ppbv
10.4
9.1
87
60 -134
Trichlorofluoromethane
ppbv
10.2
8.4
83
56 -141
Vinyl acetate
ppbv
10.6
9.1
86
61 -142
Vinyl chloride
ppbv
10
8.4
84
66 -132
IkImillIGillylo b7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
1 I'ela '
Page 9 of 13
;Ze Analytical v `
VkWY�{)dG&�.EftS.G4rR
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 143789
1020153001 DUP Max
Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers
1,1- Dichloroethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,1- Dichloroethene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,1,2 - Trichloroethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,2- Dichlorobenzene
ppbv
ND
ND
30 1
1,2- Dichloroethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,2- Dibromoethane (EDB)
ppbv
ND
ND
30 1
1,2- Dichloropropane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,2,4 - Trimethylbenzene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,3- Butadiene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,3- Dichlorobenzene
ppbv
ND
ND
30 1
1,3,5 - Trimethylbenzene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,4- Dichlorobenzene
ppbv
ND
ND
30 1
2- Butanone (MEK)
ppbv
ND
ND
30 1
2- Hexanone
ppbv
ND
ND
301
4- Ethyltoluene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Carbon disulfide
ppbv
ND
ND
30 1
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Acetone
ppbv
5.3
4.2
23 30
Benzene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Bromodichloromethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Bromomethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Bromoform
ppbv
ND
ND
301
cis- 1,2- Dichloroethene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
cis -1,3- Dichloropropen a
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Carbon tetrachloride
ppbv
ND
ND
30 1
Cyclohexane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Chlorobenzene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Chloroethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Chloroform
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Chloromethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Dibromochloromethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Ethyl acetate
ppbv
ND
ND
30 1
Ethylbenzene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Hexachlorc -1,3- butadiene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Methylene Chloride
ppbv
3.7
4.2
12 30
Methyl -tert -butyl ether
ppbv
ND
ND
30 1
4- Methyl -2- pentanone
ppbv
ND
ND
301
(MIBK)
m &p-Xylene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
n- Heptane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
�F.I[afi[t7i[t7YAPb7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
1 I'ela '
Page 10 of 13
;Ze Analytical v `
VkWY�{)dG&�.EftS.G4rR
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 143789
Parameter
Units
1020153001
Result
DUP
Result
Max
RPD RPD Qualifiers
n- Hexane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
c- Xylene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Propylene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Styrene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
trans -1,2 -Dich loroethene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
trans -1,3 -Dich loropropen a
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Tetrachloroethene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Tetrahydrofuran
ppbv
ND
ND
301
1,1,2-
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Tri ch lorotrifl u oroeth an e
Toluene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Trichloroethene
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Trichlorofluoromethane
ppbv
ND
ND
301
Vinyl acetate
ppbv
ND
ND
30 1
Vinyl chloride
ppbv
ND
ND
30 1
�F.I[afi[t7i[t7YAPb7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
1 I'ela '
Page 11 of 13
2 ce Analytical ' S
VkWY�{)dG&�.EftS.G4rR
QUALITY CONTROL DATA QUALIFIERS
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
QUALITY CONTROL PARAMETER QUALIFIERS
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery
and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD- Relative Percent Difference
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S - Surrogate
QUALITY CONTROL ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
11 j The sample and duplicate results for this parameter are less than the reporting limit, the RPD can not be
calculated.
�F.I[afi[t7i[t7YAPb7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
withoutthe written consent of P�+acceenAnalytical Services, Inc.
1 I'ela '
Page 12 of 13
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method
1020153001 RL001 TO -15
QC Batch Analytical Method
Analytical
Batch
�F.I[afi[t7i[t7YAPb7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
withoutthe written consent of P�+acceenAnalytical Services, Inc.
1 I'ela '
AIR/2747
Page 13 of 13
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
`ir,
a /
A
1700 Elm Street, Suite 200
�+tl
Minneapolis, MN 55414
vvW , )dG& /.EbtS rn
Phone: (612)607 -1700
Fax: (612)607 -6444
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project: 1020153
Project ID: AMAPLE0601 ROSELAWN AIR
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method
1020153001 RL001 TO -15
QC Batch Analytical Method
Analytical
Batch
�F.I[afi[t7i[t7YAPb7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
withoutthe written consent of P�+acceenAnalytical Services, Inc.
1 I'ela '
AIR/2747
Page 13 of 13
DATE: December 5, 2005
TO: Residents along Jackson and Roselawn in western Maplewood
SUBJECT: Public Meeting to Discuss Traffic Findings
On July 25, 2005, the Maplewood City Council received a petition from your
neighborhood regarding concerns with the impacts of heavy truck and bus traffic on
Roselawn and Jackson Avenues. The Council acknowledged your concerns by directing
the City's consultant Traffic Engineer to prepare a study of the issues and to report to the
Council on his findings.
This letter is your notice that the Council has scheduled a time on their upcoming agenda
to receive the Traffic Engineer's report and to discuss this item. The item will be
discussed as part of the agenda at the regular meeting as follows:
Monday, December 12, 2005
Maplewood City Council Chambers
1830 East County Road B
Start Time for Regular Meeting: 7:00 pm
Likely Start for this item: after 7:45 pm
A copy of the agenda for this meeting, the staff report and the traffic engineer's report on
this item will be available on the City's website at www.ci.maplewood.mn.us beginning
on Thursday, December 81h.
While this is not a public hearing, it is anticipated that the Council may hearing public
testimony on this item at the meeting. If you have concerns or comments, you should
plan to attend. If you cannot attend and wish for the Council to be aware of your
concerns, please e -mail me your concerns at chuck. ahl(a ci. maplewood.mn.us or mail me
your comments at the address below prior to the meeting.
If you have questions, you may contact the Public Works Department at 651- 249 -2400.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Charles Ahl, P.E., Director of Public Works / City Engineer
C: City Council
P: Aworks \agendaV12- 12- 05 Rose[ awn Resident Letter.doc
December 5, 2005
Lee and Craig Rossow
Mr. Steve Schneider
Comfort Bus Company, Inc.
General Manager
3101 Spruce Street
St. Paul Regional Water Services
Little Canada, MN 55117
1900 Rice Street
St. Paul, MN 55113
SUBJECT: Public Meeting to Discuss Traffic Findings
Gentleman:
On July 25, 2005, the Maplewood City Council received a petition from your area's
neighborhood regarding concerns with the impacts of heavy truck and bus traffic on Roselawn
and Jackson Avenues. The Council acknowledged the concerns by directing the City's consultant
Traffic Engineer to prepare a study of the issues and to report to the Council on his findings.
This letter is your notice that the Council has scheduled a time on their upcoming agenda to
receive the Traffic Engineer's report and to discuss this item. The item will be discussed as part
of the agenda at the regular meeting as follows:
Monday, December 12, 2005
Maplewood City Council Chambers
1830 East County Road B
Start Time for Regular Meeting: 7:00 pm
Likely Start for this item: after 7:45 pm
A copy of the agenda for this meeting, the staff report and the traffic engineer's report on this
item will be available on the City's website at www.ci.maplewood.mn.us beginning on Thursday,
December 8`
While this is not a public hearing, it is anticipated that the Council may hearing public testimony
on this item at the meeting. If you have concerns or comments, you should plan to attend. If you
cannot attend and wish for the Council to be aware of your concerns, please e -mail me your
concerns at chuck.ahl(uci.maplewood.mn.us or mail me your comments at the address below
prior to the meeting.
If you have questions, you may contact the Public Works Department at 651- 249 -2400.
NIY&we]WdkIVU0%X1111)]1]
Charles Ahl, P.E., Director of Public Works / City Engineer
C: City Council
P: Aworks \agendaV12- 12- 05 Rose[ awn Resident Letter.doc
Agenda Item L1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Pubic Works Director /City Engineer
SUBJECT: Maplewood Mall Area Transportation Improvements Project Financing
Summary and Budget Adjustments
a. Hazelwood Street Improvements (C to Beam), City Project 01 -16
b. County Road D East (TH 61 to Southlawn), City Project 02 -07
c. County Road D West (TH 61 to Highridge), City Project 02 -08
d. Kennard Street Improvements (Beam to Cty Rd D), City Project 03 -04
e. TH 61 Improvements (Beam to 1 -694), City Project 03 -07
f. County Road C Area Streets, City Project 03 -18
g. Legacy Parkway (Kennard to Hazelwood), City Project 03 -26
h. Hazelwood Street (Beam to D), City Project 03 -39
i. Bruce Vento Trail Extension (Beam to Buerkle), City Project 04 -02
j. County Road D Court , City Project 04 -06
k. TH 61 East Frontage Road (New Cty D to Old Cty D), City Project 04 -25
DATE: December 6, 2005
INTRODUCTION
In 2001 and 2002, the City Council identified the need for improvements to the area west of Maplewood
Mall. Beginning in 2003, the City began to implement a series of projects within the area to spur economic
development. A majority of those projects are nearing completion and budget adjustments are needed to
complete the overall financing. A summary of each project is provided and budget adjustments are
recommended.
Background
Attached is Exhibit A, which was developed in December 2003. It shows 17 different projects that the City
Council authorized for investigation and implementation in the Maplewood Mall Area. During the past 2 %
years a majority of the projects have been constructed or are in the process of construction. Budgets and
financing plans for each of the projects were approved at individual public hearings.
Some adjustments are now needed as tasks were completed. In the implementation of an initiative of this
size, various decisions are made in the best interest of the City by the City Engineer. This involves
completing certain improvements within one project, while deleting that same improvement from another
project. This "gray- area" was necessary for project cohesiveness and effectiveness. Final budget
adjustments are needed to make this happen.
The final outcome of this $27 million dollar initiative is that some additional funds are needed to complete
the overall plan. Various staff reports to the Council throughout 2005 have indicated these changes as
necessary; however, final adjustments were not noted. As noted in the attached Budget Summary of each
project, construction costs combined with indirect costs are about as estimated, while right of way
expenses have exceeded budgets by over $1.6 million dollars. This is good news and bad news.
Obviously the extra expense to the project needs funds; however, the economic development of the area
has far exceeded expectations as property values have skyrocketed. The net gain is much better than
estimated.
Agenda Item L1
Budget Summary /Adjustments by Project
Hazelwood (01 -16): Project costs are $217,249 under budget due to a revision to the scope of work
moving a portion of the project to the other Hazelwood project (03 -39). Additional sewer work was
completed. A transfer of $66,350 from the Sewer Fund is recommended.
County Road D East (02 -07): This is the largest project within the area. At first glance, this project
appears to be more than $3.0 million over the original budget of $8,033,600. However, adjustments, as
listed below were made during the year that impacted the budget and offset the expenses:
• July 26, 2004: Mogren agreement identifies $1,200,000 expense over right of way budget,
but future project will likely recover portions of this expense.
• February 28, 2005: Railroad Agreement approved identifying the need for $1,200,000
right of way purchase from BNSF for railroad corridor.
• May 9, 2005: Two agreements identified for extra costs during construction for bad soils
($342,556) and a pipe lowering ($251,000) that were not anticipated and required additional
funding.
• July 11, 2005: An adjustment to the BNSF agreement added $280,000 in expenses.
• September 26, 2005: An adjustment to the Xcel Agreement added $42,000 in expenses.
• The total expenses over budget added for these items are $3,315,556. Adding that amount
to the original budget gives the following budget:
• Original budget= $8,033,600
• Revised expenses = $3,315,556
• TOTAL BUDGET= $11,349,156
o Project Expenses = $11,062,770
A budget adjustment is needed for these expenses as follows:
• Add interest on investments: $ 61,257
• Ramsey Co. Payment for Trail: $ 389,680
• Regional Rail Payment for Railroad: $ 906,645
• Additional bonding in 2006: $1.671.538
• Total budget adjustment: $3,029,120
County Road D West (02 -08): This project is over budget entirely due to the right of way expenses in
the area far exceeding estimates. Additional revenue is also expected that has not been identified:
• Budget Adjustment:
• Add SPRWS Payment: $ 33,378
• Add Vadnais Heights Work: $ 44,000
• Add Developer Payment: $ 45,000
• Additional bonding in 2006: $468,544
• Total Budget Adjustment: $590,922
Kennard Street (03 -04): Project is $121,424 under budget due to work moved to Legacy Parkway, but
needs a budget adjustment to recognize a payment from SPRWS for $20,505.
TH 61 Area Improvements, County Road D Court, TH 61 Frontage Road (03- 07,04- 06,04 -25):
This combined project is on budget, except an adjustment is needed to recognize new revenue:
• Budget Adjustment:
• Add SPRWS Payment:
$26,483
• Add MnDOT Payment:
$45,000
• Total Budget Adjustment:
$71,483
Agenda Item -1
County Road C Area Streets (03 -18): This project appears in very good shape as expenses are
projected to be $583,447 below revenues due to various project revisions.
Legacy Parkway (03 -26): This project appears to be right on budget.
Hazelwood Street (03 -39): This project appears to be right on budget, if an adjustment is made to
recognize interest received on investments of $19,524.
Budget Impact Summary
This biggest impact of these revisions is a $2,140,082 additional bond sale in 2006. The Finance Director
will determine the best approach to finance this bond in 2006. Numerous payments have been received
early on these projects which results in a positive outcome for the City. For example, nearly $1.6 million in
early payments were received in 2005, which resulted in a reduced bond issue. Additionally, most of these
expenses can be financed through a bond sale of state gas tax funds. Finally, major new development
within this area that far exceeds the original plan for this area has resulted in property values that will pay
taxes that will offset this bond issue if general levy debt service is selected for this approach. That
determination will be made in the first half of 2006 as additional discussion occurs on the City's Capital
Improvement Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the budget adjustments as listed below:
• Hazelwood (01 -16): Transfer $66,350 from the Sewer Fund
• County Road D East (02 -07)
•
Add interest on investments:
$ 61,257
•
Ramsey Co. Payment for Trail:
$ 389,680
•
Regional Rail Payment for Railroad:
$ 906,645
•
Additional bonding in 2006:
$1.671.538
•
Total budget adjustment:
$3,029,120
• County Road D West (02 -08):
•
Add SPRWS Payment:
$ 33,378
•
Add Vadnais Heights Work:
$ 44,000
•
Add Developer Payment:
$ 45,000
•
Additional bonding in 2006:
$468,544
•
Total Budget Adjustment:
$590,922
• Kennard Street (03 -04): Add a payment from SPRWS for $20,505.
• TH 61 Area Improvements, County Road D Court, TH 61 Frontage Road (03- 07,04-
06,04-25):
• Add SPRWS Payment: $26,483
• Add MnDOT Payment: $45,000
• Total Budget Adjustment: $71,483
• Hazelwood Street (03 -39): Recognize interest received on investments of $19,524.
Attachments:
1. Exhibit A— MMATI Map (A color copy will be provided for Mayor and Council.)
2. Budget Summary
------ -
, I,
r r
I �-• � I vw I i I _... iti
3
iI � W J r
'li" 1 ��� - T — IIII
r -- I -J�L� {fi -
__ ___
r __ L b r� Y
� t Iol a kbL FrA L.yt�.�
r
�I +� U r 1 m4r caxrt ww o�.vamnoymaixart
V e r � r l ioiuna
r 2uu�err
F �
l
,/ L� � rl d I, 4 _ � r 3 J MM [L�.M04�f@'f 1fG�I8,CICM
� I i I III Y III II r• -'I� ,A I I V. t'FJ �-�• E i � I�TM�FWHT. MIf1HF55
Y u i I� } 4µi t.4 1 1i I r3: L j I IF m i - -:r I 11 E t i i i iT �'" ao-n: 1ttt1E �lAAV8AET801 N18KtUN0EMAq'9@ite
l � v
yl
- �- - , l : 1 •°� i i L �_ mp rmmnaaoa�maewr naemm�c eaw..
F i ��
°®_4 ' I � I - ®R6 811@i:149GIMAXFfbMJ:
i { i r• i —® * tEOptx raw vwincrov
p a 1 j��� t - @IN coma roeo olaflWO mfaf mY'IS mYL
_s -''_ '. a lf I I I
� � i C r rf ^'s -� ,- 1- rc `t`�' 11t w wmxaoro�amwcrocrAr•
ee�,ti
T
MAPLEWOOD MALL AREA
TRANSPORTAMON IMPROVEMENTS (MMATI)
�;�
IMPLE MENTATION PLAN
MAPLEWOOD MALL AREA TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
Budget Summary
6- Dec -05
Project Estimates from Public Hearings
Final Project Budget Estimates
OVER/UNDER BUDGET
Code
Pro' No.
Project Name
Construction
Indirect
Right of Way
Total
Construction
Indirect
Ri ht of Way
Total
8
01 -16
Hazelwood (C to Beam
$975,000
$307,000
$0
$1,282,000
$794,582
$267,469
$2,700
$1,064,751
$217,249
1,14,17
02 -07
Cty Rd D 61 to Southlawn
$4,377,000
$1,378,700
$2,277,900
$8,033,600
$4,541,848
$2,108,363
$4,412,559
$11,062,770
- $3,029,170
Atltl Interest on Invest
$61,257
$61,257
$0
$61,257
Atltl Ram Co for Vento Trail
$209,000
$180,680
$389,680
$0
$389,680
Atltl Regional Rail for RR
$906,695
$906,695
$0
$906,695
TOTAL FOR Cty Rd D East
$4,586,000
$1,378,700
$3,426,532
$9,391,232
$4,541,848
$2,108,363
$4,412,559
$11,062,770
- $1,671,538
2
02 -08
Cty Rd D 61 to Hi hritl a
$1,925,000
$607,130
$450,000
$2,982,130
$1,924,083
$730,496
$918,473
$3,573,052
- $590,922
Atltl SPRWS Payment
$33,378
$33,378
$0
$33,378
Atltl Vad H hts Payment
$44,000
$44,000
$0
$44,000
Atltl Developer Payment
$45,000
$45,000
$0
$45,000
TOTAL For Cty Rd D West
$2,047,378
$607,130
$450,000
$3,104,508
$1,924,083
$730,496
$918,473
$3,573,052
- $468,544
7
03 -04
Kennard Beam to D
$1,816,185
$572,100
$478,700
$2,866,985
$1,537,142
$610,585
$618,339
$2,766,066
$100,919
Atltl SPRWS Payment
$20,505
$20,505
$0
$20,505
TOTAL for Kennard
$1,836,690
$572,100
$478,700
$2,887,490
$1,537,142
$610,585
$618,339
$2,766,066
$121,424
3,5,6
03 -07
TH 61 Improvements
$1,656,323
$715,852
$0
$2,372,175
$1,706,691
$722,745
$15,961
$2,445,397
- $73,222
04 -06
County Road D Court
04 -25
TH 61 Frontage Road
Atltl SPRWS Payment
$26,483
$26,483
$0
$26,483
Atltl MnDOT Payment
$45,000
$45,000
$0
$45,000
TOTAL for TH 61 Area
$1,727,806
$715,852
$0
$2,443,658
$1,706,691
$722,745
$15,961
$2,445,397
- $1,739
16
03 -18
County Road C Area Streets
$2,203,950
$694,250
$0
$2,898,200
$1,734,471
$580,282
$0
$2,314,753
$583,447
12,13
03 -26
Legacy Parkway
$1,664,350
$482,000
$322,000
$2,468,350
$1,689,432
$557,136
$222,000
$2,468,568
-$218
9
03 -39
Hazelwood Beam to D)
1,006,700
317,100
100,000
$1,423,800
964,109
350,102
125,884
$1,440,095
- $16,295
Atltl Interest on Invest
19,524
$19,524
$0
$19,524
TOTAL for Hazelwood
1 1,026,224
317,100
100,000
1,443,324
964,109
350,1021
125,884
1,440,095
3,229
Grand Total for MMATI
1 $16,067,398
$5,074,132
$4,777,232
$25,918,7621
$14,892,3581
$5,927,1781
$6,315,916
$27,135,452
- $1,216,690
Agenda Item L2
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Planner
SUBJECT: Appeal of Staff Approval - Reduced Front Yard Setback
LOCATION: 1948 Kenwood Drive East
APPLICANT: Lisa Schnose
DATE: December 6. 2005
INTRODUCTION
On October 26, 2005, city staff approved a reduced front yard setback for Lisa Schnose for her
property at 1948 Kenwood Drive East for a detached garage. As part of the approval process, I
notified the city council and nearby neighbors of my decision. Several of the neighbors have voiced
concerns about the proposal and have appealed my decision.
BACKGROUND
On October 26, 2005, city staff approved a reduced front yard setback requested by Lisa Schnose.
Ms. Schnose is requesting that the city approve plans for a detached garage on her property at 1948
Kenwood Drive. According to the city code, the city determines the required front yard setback for the
garage by using the existing front yard setback of the property owner's house and the setback of the
two adjacent houses. Ms. Schnose's proposed garage would encroach about 26 feet into the
established front yard setback of 28 feet for her side of the street. In other words, the proposed
garage would have a front setback from the street right -of -way line (the front property line) of about
2.5 feet. As such, this request needs city approval of a reduced front yard setback. (See the
applicant's letter and statement on pages 4 through 6 and the maps and drawings on pages 7 - 12.)
DISCUSSION
CODE REQUIREMENTS
City Code at Section 44- 107(b) allows staff to approve a different front yard setback if it would not
adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions apply:
The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of the surrounding properties.
The proposed setback would save significant natural features.
The proposed setback is necessary to meet city, state, or federal regulations, such as the
pipeline setback or noise regulation.
The proposed setback is necessary for energy- saving, health, or safety reasons.
STAFF FINDINGS AND DECISION
Staff determined that the proposed garage setback would not affect the drainage or privacy of
surrounding properties.
APPEALS
The code directs staff to inform the adjacent property owners of the reduced front yard setback and
allow 15 days in which to receive comments. As noted above, several neighbors expressed concerns
about this proposal and appealed my decision by the required deadline of November 9, 2005.
Neighbor Concerns
I received letters from four neighbors expressing concerns about the proposed garage (see the letters
on pages 13 through 18). The following is a summary list of concerns with the proposal as noted by
the neighbors:
1. The height of the garage.
2. Drainage issues.
3. It will depreciate the value of our property.
4. It will create an "alley look" on the street that we will be looking at.
5. The proposed garage will affect the privacy of the homes across the street.
6. It would diminish the appeal and character of the neighborhood.
7. It will eliminate the view of the natural features beyond the existing house for the homes
across the street.
The following is staff's response to the above list of concerns:
The proposed garage height is 16 feet, the maximum height that the code allows.
2. The city engineering department did not note any specific drainage issues or concerns with
the proposed garage. The applicant or her contractor will have to ensure that grading and
drainage are properly handled during and after the completion of the garage. This is
something that the engineering department would monitor and inspect during construction.
3. Without a specific appraisal, the city and the property owners cannot determine what
effect, if any, the proposed garage would have on property values. My sense is, however,
that adding a $30,000 to $50,000 garage to a property would certainly increase the value
of that property and could certainly be seen as a benefit to the value of the neighboring
properties.
4. 1 disagree with the notion that adding the proposed garage would create an alley look on
this part of Kenwood Drive. The proposed garage would certainly be a change for the area.
However, it would require four of more property owners on the same side of the street
setting garages near the front property line to create the look of an alley. One garage, set
on a curving street with lots that have a variety of slopes and sight lines, would not create
the look or the effect of an alley.
5. As I noted in Number 4 above, the proposed garage would be a change for the area. It is
the opinion of staff that the proposed garage would not affect the privacy of the neighbors.
It would not have habitable or living space — it would be used for the storage of motor
vehicles and other personal property of the property owner. This is really no different than
the current situation where the owner now parks her vehicles outside on the existing
parking pad. Having the property owner parking her vehicles in the garage and coming anc
going from the garage is no different than her parking her vehicles on the pad and coming
and going from her property as she does now. I would agree that if the garage had living
space and it was going to be near a neighbor's home, then it could affect the privacy of the
surrounding neighbors.
6. How the proposed garage would affect the appeal and character of the neighborhood is
difficult for a person to measure and are subjective criteria. One could argue that having a
new garage on a single dwelling lot in this neighborhood is in keeping with the character of
the neighborhood and is appealing as it allows the property owner to have inside storage
for her property. The location of the proposed garage would be unique, but that is because
the characteristics of the lot are unique and make it very difficult to build on.
2
There is no question that the proposed garage would change and limit the views to the
northeast of the neighbors across the street. This also would be true if the applicant
wanted to build a second story on her house. How a garage or an addition might affect the
neighbors view of property that they do not own is not a criteria listed in the city code that
the city may consider when reviewing a setback proposal such as this.
Ms. Schnose also prepared responses to the neighbors concerns. Her comments are in the letter on
pages 19 -23. In addition, Mr. Michael Zalk, a neighbor that lives next door to Ms. Schnose, submitted
a letter of support for the proposed garage. I have included his letter on pages 24 through 26.
Further Staff Analysis
The starting point in the review of such a proposal should be to ask "Is it a reasonable request ?" It
would be nearly impossible for Ms. Schnose to build a garage that would meet the standard city front
yard setback requirement because of the existing grades and the slope of her property. This then
raises the question of how much of a front yard setback variance is enough for her to have a
reasonable opportunity to build a detached garage on her property.
The difficulty in meeting the required front yard setback is due to circumstances unique to her property
that the property owner did not cause. The city may allow property owners to build houses and
accessory structures with a variety of setbacks when the property owner can show that they have no
other reasonable alternative.
Another point to consider with this and similar requests is how the proposal would (if at all) alter the
essential character of the area. In staff's opinion, the addition of one detached garage on a single
dwelling lot in this area would not change the essential character of the area. The proposed garage, if
built, would certainly bring a change to that part of Kenwood Drive, but it would not change the
essential character of the area. It is staff's contention that the character of this area has been
established by the large lots, slopes, the age of the homes and the use of the properties for single
dwellings and their accessory structures.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the 26 -foot reduced front yard setback (so it would have at least a two -foot front yard
setback) for the detached garage for the property at 1948 Kenwood Drive East. The garage location
and design shall follow the plans submitted to the city, and city staff may approve minor changes to
the plans.
P:15- day \1948 Kenwood garage setback appeal - 2005
Attachments:
1.
Applicant's Letter
2.
Applicant's Statement
3.
Location Map
4.
Address Map
5.
Property Line Map
6.
Site Plan
7.
Proposed Front Elevation
8.
Proposed Rear Elevation
9.
Letter dated November 8, 2005 from Schmalz
10.
Letter dated November 8, 2005, from Surine
11.
Letter dated November 9, 2005 from Malm
12.
Letter dated November 8, 2005 from Dunn
13.
Letter dated December 1, 2005 from Lisa Schnose
14.
Letter dated December 4, 2005 from Michael Zalk
191
Attachment 1
•.
• a ° •••
51
Attachment 2
94 Kenwood Dr East, Maplewood,
October li
- M*t
setback I would not affect drainage of their properties.
runoff. Drawings are not finalized, however will have only cosmetic changes
',such as different window position).
b. Will the setback affect the privacy of adjacent homes?
R #
5
M
Attachment 3
Location Map
1948 KenWood Drive E l�
N
1
mg
H
03
z
w
LU
w
0
I lioFil
SKILLMAN AVE
M
0
+y
KENWOOD LN
LU
0
L)
w
IN
h on
Attachment 4
Z�
N
ROSELAWN AVE
s 1 1
Attachment 5
0
Ej
�
Ik O
0
O
F
n
Property Line Map
1948 KenWood Drive E l�
N
Attachment 6
ti
n e
` l
.a ■ A
\ i
10
/
EXIST '
_ l
3LD f3.
1
enotes iron monument
r
v
P
ActlfaN
4
S ri wu
r
r
, { p
— �
r
r1
9
4
/ .. v J
t46'
S •1 ! ( .'2
,` °' ... . -.',
! }`� T
0 k) tic
�rktaf Gceu, g�
ti
n e
` l
.a ■ A
\ i
10
Attachment 7
View LXK(NG NOant
Fad S`�FT°
'✓L�c4 ++C: 3e-zE au..d 3z i4 s:w ✓W
I
4
N
Attachment 8
�
1 Vii.' F :
12
Attachment 9
November 8, 2005
Reference: Reduced Front Yard Setback Approval for a Detached Garage
at 1948 KeinvGod Drive East,
fle apprure V;777= FaCK 4*11 L11C 10@CrLy
located at 1948 Kenwood Drive East.
We question if city codes were entirely followed for this project.
A reduced front vard setback for a detached garage at 1948 Kenwood
Drive East will greatly change the view from the front of our home, inside
and outside, to that of an alley scene as the front and side of the
proposed garage will be our vista.
We oppose the. proposed reduced front yard setback. We request the
11114 MWAU*M ANIMM019,14 I
Sincerely
C >
6 � W
Carol Schm
William P. Schmalz
1943 Kenwood Drive East
Mapletix Minnesota 55117
CMS:cms
IM
Attachment 10
Reduced Front Yard Setback Approval Detached
Kenwood Dr East
• i s
setback • i Drive East, hereafter referred to as the subject.
We are opposed to this proposal for the foll
101
15
logical to at minimum, preserve that character by closely adhering to
established R-I requirements wherever appropriate. M
11101
Attachment 11
1947 Kenwood Drive, East
Maplewood, MIT 55117
November 9, 2005
Sincerel
Gilbert B. Xalm
17
Attachment 12
V.
November 8, 2005
I
#1 0 01014 owl t o ME Milamur
relemngto a detached garage at 1948 Kenwood Winve h. 11t assume y-au telt this will not ANget
us, but it will affect us.
wiffil 0
1dfWFWW11A(;"j 1,04.111
Sincerely,
WE
U
767 EAST ROSELAWN —3' M, EWOOD, MINNESOTA 55117 (61.2)772 -1603
18
Attachment 13
December 1, 2005
Kenneth Roberts
Office of Community Development, City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Reduced front yard setback approval for a detached garage at 1948 Kenwood
Drive East
Kenneth and the City of Maplewood,
This letter is to provide input on questions and concerns of my neighbors, followed by
additional thoughts and summary. I appreciate their concerns and want to make sure
they are answered. I too greatly value our neighborhood characteristics, which I have
and will continue to consider in conducting this project.
Melva and Noel Dunn
*Reduced property value ( "...greatly depreciate the value of our property... ")
- Property improvements historically have a positive effect on value of surrounding
property.
.Reduced view ( "We feel it will greatly minimize the rural esthetics, closing up a
vista...")
-Yes, the view into the "valley" from the street, and across the street, will nearly be
blocked. After significant research to identify configuration and location options,
there is no other place the garage can be located. So location is out of necessity;
I'm not choosing to restrict the view when there is another option.
- Specifically, there will be about 10 feet (at an angle) between the garage and house
corners, as shown on the Site Plan attached to the October 26 letter. Standing on
the road, aligned with the left side of the house, there will be approximately a 2 -foot
sight line between house and garage.
- Projected across the street, this 2 -foot strip falls between 1947 and 1943 Kenwood
Drive East homes. So, Gilbert Malm will no longer be able to see across the
"valley ". William and Carol Schmalz will have a much more limited view of the trees
belonging to 1950 Kenwood Drive East. Their sight line towards the "valley ",
between 1948 and 1950 Kenwood Drive East, will be unchanged.
1F'7
- Likewise from Noel and Melva Dunn's property: more limited view of 1950
Kenwood Drive East trees, and unchanged sight line toward the "valley ".
- Jeffrey and Barbara Surine currently have no view into the "valley ", and see the
1950 Kenwood Drive East trees from the front and left (west), so the garage will
cause minimal change to the view from their home and yard.
• "in- your -face alley affect"
-I've seen no alleys with garages placed approximately 28 feet back from the edge
of the traveled lane. Yes, the garage will be closer to the road than other structures
in the neighborhood. But no, it will not be within a couple or several feet of the edge
of the road as in alleys.
Gilbert Malm
,Reduced view ( "...garage would completely eliminate my view of the natural features
beyond. ")
-Yes, Gilbert Malm's view will be changed the most, as he will no longer be able to
see across the "valley ".
-This doesn't change anything, but as stated above there is no other option for
garage location. Due to site size and topography it is impossible to place the garage
in a location that will not restrict the view.
Carol and William Schmalz
*Question if city codes followed (height, drainage, environmental issues, natural
character)
-City codes /process must be followed, which is assured by Maplewood's building
permit and inspection procedures. Regarding height, the garage meets code (Sec.
44 -114 (b)). Regarding drainage, Maplewood's process incorporates review of the
grading plan to assure acceptable drainage. The garage will have no effect on
drainage of surrounding properties.
*Reduced property value
-Refer to similar item above
:'It will be placing an alley look on a section of Kenwood Drive East"
-Refer to similar item above
•Reduced view ( "greatly change the view from the front of our home, inside and
outside... ")
-Yes, there will be a much more limited view of the trees belonging to 1950 Kenwood
Drive East. Again, it is impossible to place the garage in a location that will not
restrict the view.
RZ11
Barbara and Jeffrey Surine
*"...suspect that the predominant setback for most homes in the neighborhood to be 30
to 35 feet as commonly preferred ", "...the predominant setback for most homes in this
neighborhood is 30 feet ".
-1 did not request data to be able to confirm this. This appears to be true from the
Address Map attached to your letter dated October 26. Most homes have a similar
setback, with 1990 and 2000 Kenwood Drive East appearing closer to the right -of-
way.
*Significant reduction in setback ("...dramatic deviation from the code..."
-Yes. This doesn't change anything, but after much research to identify options, this
is the only feasible location.
:'The proposed garage will affect the privacy of all three homes across the street within
its view"
-The garage will have no effect on privacy of any neighbor. The garage does not
change their view of people, nor separation from people (i.e. privacy). The future
driveway is currently used as a parking area, so use of this area will not change.
Presence of the garage will not cause more people or more activity to take place
closer to their homes.
11
... garage with a two foot setback will create the effect of the street becoming an alley."
-Refer to similar item above
,"...substantially injures and detracts from the privacy of neighboring properties and
adversely affects the character of the neighborhood."
- Regarding privacy, refer to similar item above
-1 hear this opinion but have a different one. Most people realize a garage is a
functional structure, and many would consider lack of a garage as a negative for a
neighborhood (perhaps more so if the garage didn't restrict a view they appreciate).
A well- designed garage looks better or no worse than cars parked outside. The
garage was designed to match current architecture and look attractive. High quality
materials will be used (wood siding in front, painted cement board on 3 sides,
shingles in color to match house). A garage that detracts from the neighborhood
certainly could be built, however that is not my plan.
.Height
-The full text of excerpted Sec. 44 -114 (c) reads "The city council may approve an
increase in height or area by conditional use permit. However, the maximum area of
any one building shall not exceed the maximum area allowed for an attached garage
in subsection (a) of this section, and the height shall not exceed the height of the
house." I am not requesting an increase in height or area. There is no indication the
interpretation of this statute is as suggested in the Surine's letter.
•Reduced view
-Refer to similar items above
21
*Advocating application of R -E Residence Estate Districts, with 15 -foot rather than 5-
foot garage side setback
- Retaining the existing attributes of an area whenever possible makes sense, as this
is the spirit of the codes. As mentioned, side setback for garages is 5 feet for our
area and 15 feet for R -E Residence Estate Districts. Garages in the area are close
to side property lines (1943 Kenwood Drive East, 767 Roselawn), per the Address
Map and Property Line Map. Even several houses are close to the property line,
with code being 10 feet (1947, 1936 Kenwood Drive East). Suggesting application
of an attribute that isn't a current characteristic of the neighborhood doesn't make
sense.
There are longer -term benefits that may not have been realized in the 2 -week period
allowed for neighbor review. (2 weeks was short, compared to the time I've been
thinking and planning!) After hearing many of the concerns in- person, and reading them
on paper, I do still need a garage, and believe this garage will have an overall positive
or neutral (definitely not negative) impact on our neighborhood. Following are further
thoughts.
I understand this project is a change within an established neighborhood, affecting a
view that neighbors have enjoyed many years. However I am somewhat surprised that
a well- designed garage is perceived as more negative than lack of garage. Lack of
garage is typically found in low -end areas only, and is not a positive for a nice
neighborhood.
A garage is a functional structure. Lack of a garage and enclosed stairs makes it
difficult or impossible for someone with 1) limited mobility (temporary or permanent) or
2) lack of physical ability or energy (temporary or permanent) to live here. The outside
steps become slippery with ice and snow, and to a lesser extent with rain. Therefore
this property improvement will be of great value to me. Lack of front yard setback
approval will mandate continued and additional physical challenges to living here.
This property improvement will also be positive for the neighborhood long -term, as
future owners would likely build a garage (that could be much less appealing) or be
limited to those willing to live without a garage (ruling out most people, with kids, boats,
common sense!, those unwilling or unable to shovel).
All options were investigated, and garage was designed with consideration of the lot
and area. It is smaller than standard size and has minimum roof pitch, with appearance
and materials to tie it to the house.
The best decision is to grant the reduced front yard setback for this property
improvement, which is planned and designed in the best manner possible for this lot.
Allowing 1948 Kenwood Drive East to also have a garage, and the neighborhood to
W
have a functional improvement that respects neighborhood characteristics as much as
possible, should take precedence over the continued ability to view others' property.
Please make sure all neighbors, both who commented and didn't comment, receive
future communications as appropriate so everyone is informed.
Thank you!
Lisa Schnose
1948 Kenwood Drive East
Maplewood, MN 55117
091
Attachment 14
December 4, 2005
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
Planner, Office of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood MN 55109
Re: Reduced Front Yard Setback Approval for Detached Garage at 1948
Kenwood Drive East
Dear Mr. Roberts:
We own the home at 1946 Kenwood Drive East, and are next door neighbors
immediately to the east of Lisa Schnose's home at 1948 Kenwood Drive East. We write in
strong support of her proposed detached garage project and the City's approval of the reduced
front year setback. We request that the City Council deny the appeals by the various neighbors
who have written in opposition to the City Planner's decision.
We believe this decision by the City Planner has carefully and adequately addressed the
various relevant interests of Ms. Schnose and the neighborhood we all enjoy. Unfortunately,
several neighbors with homes or backyards fronting on the other side of our street have objected
to the proposed garage on grounds that, when examined closely, amount to little more than a
complaint that they will no longer have an unobstructed view of our back yards. We believe this
is not a sound or sufficient reason to deny to Ms. Schnose the obvious benefits of a garage.
Sorting through the various letters of appeal, we address the various neighbors arguments
on appeal:
" The garage would create an `in -your -face alley affect' in the neighborhood
We note that the proposed garage would be set back approximately 30 feet from
the edge of the existing roadway, which itself is located at the very northern edge
of the usable portion of the City's right of way. To argue that the garage will be
so close to the road so as to remind one of an "alley" is gross exaggeration. The
architectural plans we have reviewed demonstrate Ms. Schnose's concern to
design a reasonably attractive and functional new structure that is clearly a better
alternative to the bituminous parking deck that presently serves the home. By
permitting Ms. Schnose to park her vehicles indoors, the garage will eliminate the
clutter of cars parked on or near the street.
2. " Ms. Schnose's garage would reduce the value of our home We believe
exactly the opposite. Homes with garages are much more desirable than homes
OZAI
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
December 4, 2005
Page 2
without garages, and therefore command a higher selling price. It is well known
that the price of a home reflects, among many other things, the value of the homes
around it. So a higher value for 1948 Kenwood Drive East. would normally
enhance, rather than depreciate, the value of neighboring homes. We have always
believed that when our neighbors invest in their property, they are indirectly
investing in ours as well. We believe no differently with this project.
3. " The proposed garage will affect the privacy of all three homes across the
street within its view " A garage... substantially injures and detracts from
the privacy of neighboring properties This is a puzzling argument. The
garage does not put any vehicle or driver any closer to the three homes across the
street, or at any higher elevation, so as to infringe on any neighbor's privacy. The
City Zoning Ordinance obviously allows garages as a useful and important
improvement to homes in R -1 zoning areas. I'm skeptical that any homeowner on
Kenwood Drive East, including the complaining neighbors, would concede that
their garages detract from their neighbors' privacy. Instead, a garage increases
the privacy of its owner, and does nothing in itself to intrude on the privacy of
other properties surrounding it. The neighbors may not care to look at this garage,
but their "privacy" is not affected by the structure.
4. " The neighborhood exhibits characteristics of an R -E Residence Estate
District (and so we should impose similar minimum side setback
restrictions) This argument is another stretch that doesn't fit the case. Our
neighborhood is zoned R -1, not R -E. Nearly every structure in the area suggested
by the neighbor would need to be grandfathered into a new zone R -E, because
they would not comply with the more restrictive setback minimums.
5. " Construction of the proposed garage would `close up our vista' and `totally
eliminate the views' of all three affected properties [across the street]
While we understand and appreciate how much our neighbors enjoy their view to
the north, it should be clarified that nowhere in Chapter 44 of the Maplewood
City Code does the law imply a "view easement" in favor of any properties like
those on our street. A homeowner such as Ms. Schnose owns the real property
from the ground to the sky and may construct improvements on it so long as those
improvements comply with local law. She is not proposing to build a structure
that is taller than the zoning code permits.
The irony in the neighbors' objection is that the same steep slope that affords
them a view to the north of (behind) Ms. Schnose's home presents the engineering
problems that cause the garage to be proposed at street level. The neighbors have
come to so enjoy the situation of Ms. Schnose's house on the lot below the street
elevation that they object to plans for a reasonable structure constructed at street
25
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
December 4, 2005
Page 3
level, where most structures are built. Ms. Schnose could, of course, without
violating any laws, plant trees that would grow to block the "vista." She should
not be denied the comforts and benefits of a garage in order to preserve a skyline
view.
Lastly, the neighbor's charge that the proposed garage will violate Sec. 44- 114 (c)
by exceeding the height of the house ignores that this measurement, I believe,
should be taken from grade and is not an absolute, or "sea- level" elevation
measurement. Based on plans I've reviewed, the garage will not be taller than the
house, when each are measured from grade. If the City interprets this code
section as the neighbor urges, we would support a variance from this code section
in order to permit this structure.
None of the complaining neighbors suggest an alternative design for a garage at 1948
Kenwood Drive East. There are not to be blamed for that because, in the opinion of Ms.
Schnose's advisors and the City Engineer I spoke to on the subject, there is no other feasible
design for a garage on this property due to the severe front yard slope. It would of course be
more desirable if a garage would fit into the property below street elevation, out of sight of all,
accessible by driveway to the street and more easily accessible to the homeowner. But there is
no feasible plan for building such a structure.
In summary we believe that the proposed design will not detract from the attractiveness
of the neighborhood and will enhance the value of Ms. Schnose's home and the homes around it.
Ms. Schnose is prepared to make a very substantial investment to improve her property, remove
her vehicles from an exposed parking deck and gain the obvious comforts of a garage. We
appreciate the City's support of her proposal to date. We strongly urge the City Council to deny
the appeals and support the staff approval of the reduced front yard setback.
Very truly yours,
Michael D. Za
MDZJc
26 2382261 v01 12/06/2005
Agenda Item L3
X411 hr1e1:r1
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner
SUBJECT:
Easement Vacation Request— Ramsey County Library Site
LOCATION:
Southlawn Drive, South of Legacy Parkway
DATE:
November 29, 2005
INTRODUCTION
Jason Thomas, of the Hartford Group, is requesting that the city council vacate the
drainage and utility easements that lie on the proposed Ramsey County Library site in
Legacy Village. The library site is presently comprised of two lots which have 10 -foot-
wide drainage and utility easements along their common lot line. The total easement
width is 20 feet and runs from Southlawn Drive to the back lot line.
DISCUSSION
The city's engineering staff reviewed this proposal and determined that there is no
reason to retain these easements. These easements were dedicated with the platting of
this property since they followed the common lot lines. This is a typical platting
requirement for subdivision approvals. There are no utilities within these easements.
With the potential development of the library on this site, there is no reason to retain
these easements. The city council should, however, require that the lots be combined
into one legally- described parcel since the site will be developed as one.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution in the staff report vacating the drainage and utility easements on the
proposed Ramsey County Library site at Legacy Village. Vacation is in the public
interest since these easements would serve no public purpose. As a condition of this
vacation, the applicant shall combine both lots into one legally- described property before
obtaining a building permit.
p:sec3 \Library Easement Vacation Summary
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Easement Vacation Request— Ramsey County Library Site
LOCATION: Southlawn Drive, South of Legacy Parkway
DATE: November 29. 2005
INTRODUCTION
Jason Thomas, of the Hartford Group, is requesting that the city council vacate the
drainage and utility easements that lie on the proposed Ramsey County Library site in
Legacy Village. The library site is presently comprised of two lots which have 10 -foot-
wide drainage and utility easements along their common lot line. The total easement
width is 20 feet and runs from Southlawn Drive to the back lot line. Refer to the
attachments.
- 7e[83:(r]:Zo1l1.U:
October 24, 2005: The city council approved a land use plan amendment from BC
(business commercial) to L (library). They also approved a PUD (planned unit
development) revision to allow the proposed library use.
Findings for Approval
To vacate an easement, the city council must find that it is in the public interest.
DISCUSSION
The city's engineering staff reviewed this proposal and determined that there is no
reason to retain these easements. These easements were dedicated with the platting of
this property since they followed the common lot lines. This is a typical platting
requirement for subdivision approvals. There are no utilities within these easements.
With the potential development of the library on this site, there is no reason to retain
these easements. The city council should, however, require that the lots be combined
into one legally- described parcel since the site will be developed as one.
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
November 21, 2005: The planning commission recommended approval of this
easement vacation with the staff recommendation.
Nx8101MI MI:Iki U7-11d[a]ki
Adopt the resolution in the staff report vacating the drainage and utility easements on the
proposed Ramsey County Library site at Legacy Village. Vacation is in the public
interest since these easements would serve no public purpose. As a condition of this
vacation, the applicant shall combine both lots into one legally- described property before
obtaining a building permit.
1N:Ia :I7:I.[a] :91.1;101N M F-1 1 1d[a].
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 4.7 acres
Existing Use: Undeveloped
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Legacy Parkway and Ashley Furniture
South: Birch Run Station
East: South lawn Drive, the Maplewood Best Western and the Maplewood Mall
West: The Legacy Village Sculpture Park
PLANNING
Land Use Plan: L (library)
Zoning: PUD
APPLICATION DATE
We received the complete application and plans for this proposal on October 24, 2005.
State law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete
applications. A decision on this request is required by December 23, 2005.
p:sec3 \Library Easement Vacation 11'05
Attachments:
1. Location and Zoning Map
2. Library Conceptual Site Plan
3. Proposed Easement Vacation Detail
4. Applicant's Letter dated October 19, 2005
5. Easement Vacation Resolution
COUNW NbADD Attachment 1
Proposed Ramsey County Library Site 3
Location & Zoning Map ,
Attachment 2
'MA
) r
EXISTING WETLANDS
-Ll t
Pueuc PARK
WN TRAO.S
10.09 ACRES
EASEMENT
LOCATION
f/
�RART6ipRl6tT]GN:
BYI061N0 • / FL6IX1- 36.606 SF.
COFFEE RETALL- Y.4068f.
6RE- 264,6305F.{4.7DACRE4}
Yf466RFACEPARN610
I
I° = Too
ommmommmom
50 0 100
C�cOPrRlcxrxo+iuRTFaRO t:RO�>P NE, 6tG.
HARTFORD
GROUP AI�E INC.
Archito4tuu - Engineering - Planning
12106 Si. k Lm , Ed= Pnwk. MN 35344
Ph (952)746-3206 - F=(952)743.1291
9
/ ( � RETA
r 1 ( 1 .2,4" 6F.
E NTRM
ENTRANCE E
j
ENTRANCE
Ll
."7
Q .
Pmiw1 rilN
CONCEPT SITE PLAN
RAMSEY COUNTY LIBRARY
SOUTHLAWN AREA
LEGACY VILLAGE AT
MAPLEWOOD, MN.
�6.
�
ry a ry
f�
0
fn
1
6 -1 -OS
1/1
4
Attachment 3
3 `OSED
WENT
MON
5
gae ".daFt f 3 { r il�
� !
' LEGACY
PARKWAY
s o
N
f
;
S
€';
•��
�i9 it�
-
� �
� I
` �
RE
dia xt9 FE3 `3z.'' E =te s
I'
I
,!� o - 2 --'
4 ',F,'
I
PROI
EASI
VACS
S
.. q • q
__ ,�...�s...
____
0 3i[g 2 li
;
�
E
5 n
Attachment 3
3 `OSED
WENT
MON
5
Attachment 4
HARTFORD
Real Estatc Development. Architecture.Engineerior, Financial Services
October 19, 2005
Mr. Tom Ekstrand
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
VIA U.S. MAIL
Re: Submittal — Easement Vacation (Lots 1 and 2, Block 4)
Dear Mr. Ekstrand:
Enclosed please find Hartford Group, Inc.'s Public Vacation Application, requesting the vacation
of the ten (10) foot drainage and utility easements platted along the common property line
separating Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Legacy Village of Maplewood, Ramsey County. These
drainage easements are indicated on the enclosed map. As you can see from the map and the
legal descriptions of the easements proposed for vacation, we are proposing to leave intact the 10
foot drainage and utility easement around the perimeter of both lots.
The application asks for a certified list of abutting property owners. I've attached the July 21,
2005, certified list from the Library's comprehensive plan and planned unit development
amendments; although we, and possibly the City, technically constitute the only affected
property owners. Therefore, I have not requested a new certified list.
Lastly, please find enclosed the fee of $603.00 (5583 application fee and $20.00 for recording).
If you need anything else, please let me know.
Sincerely,
J on H. Thomas
Associate General Counsel
Email: jthomas@hartfordgrp.co
Enclosure
HARTFORD GROUP, INC. * 12100 Singletree Lane, Suite 100 • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 -7933
(952) 746 -1200 a Telephone www.hartfordgrp.com (952) 746 -1201 * Fax
2
Attachment 1
Attachment 5
EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Jason Thomas, of the Hartford Group, applied for the vacation of
a 20- foot -wide drainage and utility easement on the proposed Ramsey County Library
site in Legacy Village. This easement is described as follows:
The South ten (10) feet of Lot 1, Block 4, Legacy Village of Maplewood;
LESS AND EXCEPT:
The West ten (10) feet of the South ten (10) feet of Lot 1, Block 4;
LESS AND EXCEPT:
The East ten (10) feet of the South ten (10) feet of Lot 1, Block 4.
The North ten (10) feet of Lot 2, Block 4, Legacy Village of Maplewood;
LESS AND EXCEPT:
The West ten (10) feet of the North ten (10) feet of Lot 2, Block 4;
LESS AND EXCEPT:
The East ten (10) feet of the North (10) feet of Lot 2, Block 4.
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2005, the planning commission held a public
hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to
the abutting property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a
chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission also
considered reports and recommendations from the city staff. The planning commission
recommended that the city council approve this request.
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2005, the city council this request after
considering the recommendations of staff and the planning commission.
WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, the public interest in the
property will go to the adjoining property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above -
described vacation because the vacation is in the public interest since these easements
would serve no public purpose. As a condition of this vacation, the applicant shall
combine both lots into one legally- described property before obtaining a building permit.
The Maplewood City Council this resolution on December 12, 2005.
7
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2005
V. PUBLIC HEARING (7:05-7:10 p.m.)
a. Easement Vacation — Legacy Village (west of Southlawn Drive, south of Legacy
Parkway)
Mr. Ekstrand said Jason Thomas, of the Hartford Group, is requesting that the city council
vacate the drainage and utility easements that lie on the proposed Ramsey County Library
site in Legacy Village. The library site is presently comprised of two lots which have 10 -foot-
wide drainage and utility easements along their common lot line. The total easement width is
20 feet and runs from Southlawn Drive to the back lot line. Mr. Ekstrand said the applicant,
Jason Thomas, of the Hartford Group, was unable to be present due to an illness in the family
but staff anticipated they could answer questions for the commission.
Chairperson Fischer asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak regarding this item.
Nobody in the audience came forward.
Chairperson Fischer closed the public hearing portion of the meeting.
Commissioner Trippler moved to adopt the resolution in the staff report vacating the drainage
and utility easements on the proposed Ramsey County Library site at Legacy Village.
Vacation is in the public interest since these easements would serve no public purpose. As a
condition of this vacation, the applicant shall combine both lots into one legally- described
property before obtaining a building permit.
Commissioner Dierich seconded. Ayes — Ahlness, Desai, Dierich, Fischer,
Grover, Kaczrowski, Trippler
The motion passed.
This item goes to the city council on December 12, 2005.
■ The second public hearing wasn't scheduled to begin until 7:15 p.m. Until the next
public hearing began staff discussed future planning commission meeting dates that
need to be rescheduled due to city holidays.
The planning commission meeting for Monday, January 2, 2006, falls on a city holiday
and city hall is closed, so the meeting needs to be rescheduled. The planning commission
agreed to reschedule their meeting for Tuesday. January 3, 2006
The planning commission meeting for Monday, January 16, 2006, falls on Martin Luther
King Day, which is a city holiday and city hall is closed. The planning commission agreed to
reschedule the meeting for Tuesday. January 17, 2006
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item L4
TO: City Manager
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Plat for Tire View Estate
LOCATION: Highway 61 and County Road D Extension (the former Venburg Tire Site)
DATE: November 29, 2005
INTRODUCTION
Chuck Ahl, the Maplewood Public Works Director, is requesting that the city council approve the
preliminary and final plat for the former Venburg Tire property. The proposed plat is called Tire
View Estate. The reason for submitting this subdivision for platting approval is to dedicate the
right -of -way for County Road D. This plat will not create any additional lots. Refer to the
attachments.
BACKGROUND
In 2004, the City of Maplewood purchased this property for the County Road D Extension street -
construction project. The city has a purchase agreement with Bruce Mogren, the abutting
property owner.
IQ6Y811b :9[a]ki I
As stated above, this plat has not been submitted to create new lots. It is only needed to dedicate
the right -of -way for County Road D.
The city's consultant, Bob Burrell of URS, checked with the Ramsey County Surveyor and the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for their comments about this plat. According
to Mr. Burrell in his attached letter, the plat has been prepared in accordance with Ramsey County
and MnDOT requirements. Approval of the plat should be subject to the requirements noted by
MnDOT in their attached letter.
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
November 21, 2005: The planning commission recommended approval of this preliminary and
final plat.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Tire View Estate preliminary and final plat as submitted. Approval is subject to the
conditions stated in the March 18, 2005, letter from MnDOT.
p:sec4 \Tire View Plat 11'05
Attachments:
1. Location and Zoning Map
2. Tire View Estate Plat Reduction
3. Letter from URS dated October 28, 2005
4. Letter from MnDOT dated March 18, 2005
5. Tire View Estate Plat date- stamped November 2, 2005 (separate attachment)
Attachment 1
COUNTY ROAD
BEAM AVE
Location and Zoning Map a
Tire View Estates 3
N
A
TIRE VIEW ESTATE
P
XI
it
/
1 <u
P
NnM[
5
I
# I
I
1
jl1
kl
I
�
j 1 ,
TIRE VIEW ESTATE
COUNTY ROAD 0
r—
.e —
LOT 1
BLOCK 1
aee � 1 P .ee .,NXn N,'
C �
I
�G'UF E r•
E IfJ u� IJ
NO SEY CWNry
I
I
w o
MONITY MM
SECPW } TONNAtlP 22, AM. 12
aE.°xE nA ra® w me
M 6,X,GT A AL1 W Np
W XNI EI.wC 6 X pYN'[.
O OA4 A p. l -Ym 1. XwLXON
mow uw Or ° uw AA Nf!
..i OFIINw REwil°® LWG i,1(Y
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
rF
c+
a
s
3
O)
J
f1'
,N,
P
COUNTY ROAD 0
r—
.e —
LOT 1
BLOCK 1
aee � 1 P .ee .,NXn N,'
C �
I
�G'UF E r•
E IfJ u� IJ
NO SEY CWNry
I
I
w o
MONITY MM
SECPW } TONNAtlP 22, AM. 12
aE.°xE nA ra® w me
M 6,X,GT A AL1 W Np
W XNI EI.wC 6 X pYN'[.
O OA4 A p. l -Ym 1. XwLXON
mow uw Or ° uw AA Nf!
..i OFIINw REwil°® LWG i,1(Y
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
rF
c+
a
s
3
O)
J
f1'
,N,
Attachment 3
October 28, 2005
Mr. Tom Ekstrand
Senior Planner
City of Maplewood Community Development Department
1830 County Road B, East
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Preliminary and Final Plat of TIRE VIEW ESTATE
Dear Mr. Ekstrand:
As part of the extension of County Road D (City Project 02 -07) to TH 61, the City of Maplewood acquired the .
old Vendburg Tire property for road right -of -way. The north portion of the property will be reserved for the
roadway while the south portion will be available for redevelopment.
Enclosed are applications for a Preliminary and Final Plat to separate the needed road right -of -way from the rest
of the parcel. The proposed plat is titled TIRE VIEW ESTATES (TVE). We anticipate that the remaining
parcel will be sold to adjoining property owners and eventually redeveloped as part of a larger project. It is
probable that the future project will re -plat this parcel as part of the developments overall plat.
hi March 2005, the TVE plat was submitted to Mn/DOT for their review and comment. MN/DOT responded to
Ken Roberts of your office on March 18, 2005(a copy of this letter is enclosed). Also at this time, we submitted
the plat to the Ramsey County Surveyor's Office for their review and approval. The plat drawings that are
enclosed resolve the comments and issues raised by MrLMOT and Ramsey County. The plat includes the
following features:
1. The Right -of -way needed for County Road D is dedicated as road right -of -way
2. A 10 -foot drainage and utility strip is included along the perimeter of LO T 1, BLOCK I
Under a separate document, access will be restricted TH 61 and a portion of County Road D on Lot 1 of TVE.
We have prepared a right of access exhibit and a description that will be forwarded to the City Attorney for
preparation of the legal documents that are necessary for recording. This action was taken by a separate
document because access restrictions are not allowed to be dedicated on a plat in Ramsey County.
If you need additional information, please contact me at 612.373.6882.
S I
L
Bob Burrell, PLS
Staff Surveyor
Enclosures
cc: Chuck Ahl, City of Maplewood File 31809400.00201
Erin Laberee, City of Maplewood
Keith Dahl, URS
Karl Keel, URS
Thresher Square • 700 Thin! Sfreee .South - Srrire 000 • Minneapolis, MN 5,541.5 • Phone. (612) 370 -0700 • Fax: (612) 570 -1578
Attachment 4
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
p
March 18, 2005
Mr. Ken Roberts
Maplewood Community Development
City of Maplewood
1830 Country Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
SUBJECT: Tire View Estates, Mn/DOT review # PO5 -026
Southeast Quadrant of TH 61 and County Road D
Maplewood, Ramsey County
Control Section # 6222
Dear Mr. Roberts:
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) has reviewed the above referenced plat
in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further
development, please address the following issues:
Mn/DOT Traffic and State Aid met with area representatives met with the City and their
consultants on February 11, 2005. In this meeting, the City agreed that there would be no
access points on County Road D in the southeast quadrant until past the longest queue of
the westbound traffic at the TH 61 and County Road D intersection. Looking at the
Synehro model done by SEH and modifying the westbound approach from a combination
of right turn, a through, and dual lefts to a combination right turn, through/right, and dual
lefts, the overall westbound queue length drops from 2000 feet to 1150 feet. Therefore,
the first access on County Road D in the southeast quadrant of TH 61 /County Road D
intersection should be 1200 feet to the east of the intersection. The westbound approach
of the intersection needs to have a shared through/right turn lane. Questions pertaining to
this issue can be directed to Nicole Rosen (651- 634 - 2145), of Mn/DOT's Metro Traffic
section.
A drainage permit may be needed. The proposed development will need to maintain
existing drainage rates (i.e., the rate at which storm water is discharged from the site must
not increase). Please provide a drainage area map and grading plans for the proposed
project showing existing and proposed drainage areas and directional flow arrows.
Hydraulic comps for both existing and proposed conditions will also be needed for the 2,
10, and 100 year events (24 hour event). Electronic .pdf files of the plans and electronic
copies of the hydraulic modeling are preferred. These can be emailed to
scoff .carlstrotn(Z�dot.state.mn.us Please direct questions concerning these issues to Scott
Caristrom ( 651 - 634 -2416) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources section.
■ This plat does not contain any land ties, so MnMOT's Surveys section cannot check the
location of the boundary line with respect to the right of way line. Recent survey field
data on the acquisition centerline & monumented right of way line for TH 61 is available
at the East Metro Survey office in Oakdale. Please contact Matt Wemet, Mn1DOT
Surveys, at 651- 779 -5482, for more information.
As a reminder, County Road D is County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 19. Any work on
a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. The County must review any
changes to its CSAH system so that they stay within its system limitations. You may
obtain additional information regarding State Aid rules and policies in any of the
following ways:
➢ hitp: / /www.dot.state.nm.us /stateaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms
and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual.
D Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5- 892.200 for information
regarding standards and policies.
➢ Please go to )lip:/ /www.revisor.le .sg tate.nin.us /arule /8820/ for information
regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820.
➢ For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road
Design Manual (English) Table 5 -3.04A and Figure 5 -3.04A for guidance and
policies. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at 651 -582 -1389 with
any additional questions.
• Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit
forms are available from Mn/DOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsw/util
direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Keith Van Wagner (651-
582- 1443), or Buck Craig (651- 582 -1447) of Mn/DOT's Metro Permits Section.
• Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land
use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in
complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise
standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of
Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for
taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise
Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in
violations of established noise standards.
MnIDOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the
expenditure of highway finds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The project
proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to
minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding
Mn/DOT's noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Design section at 651 -582-
1293.
Please send a copy of the final plat for Mn/DOT review to the following address:
Brad Canaday
Mn/DOT — Metro East Surveys
3485 Hadley Ave. N.
Oakdale, Minnesota 55128
Phone: (651) 779 -5007
As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as
plats and site plans to:
Development Review Coordinator
MnlDOT - Metro Division
1500 West County Road B -2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2)
copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a
plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay
Mn/DOT's 30-day review and response process to development proposals. We appreciate your
anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from
having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals.
As our request, please send an electronic .pdf file copy of your plan submittal for our record
keeping purposes to mary.i ackson(2Wot.state.mn. Please refer to Mn/DOT Review # P05 -026
when emailing the .pdf file. 'Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call me at 651 -582 -1724 or Tod Sherman at 651 -582 -1548.
Sinn
Cpl
Mary E. Jackson
Planner
Copy: David Claypool, Ramsey County Surveyors
Dan Soler, Ramsey County Traffic Engineer
URS Corp.
Eta
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2005
a. Tire View Estate Preliminary Plat (east of Highway 61 at new County Road D) (7:16 —
7:21 p.m.)
Mr. Ekstrand said Chuck Ahl, the Maplewood Public Works Director, is requesting that the city
council approve the preliminary and final plat for the former Venburg Tire property. The
proposed plat is called Tire View Estate. The reason for submitting this subdivision for platting
approval is to dedicate the right -of -way for County Road D. This plat will not create any
additional lots.
In 2004, the City of Maplewood purchased this property for the County Road D extension
street construction project. The city has a purchase agreement with Bruce Mogren, the
abutting property owner.
Commissioner Trippler asked where the name of this property came from?
Mr. Ekstrand said Chuck Ahl and Chris Cavett came up with the name Tire View Estate for the
property.
Chairperson Fischer asked if anyone in the audience wanted to come forward regarding this
item?
Nobody in the audience came forward to speak.
Chairperson Fischer closed the public hearing portion of the meeting.
Commissioner Trippler moved to approve the Tire View Estate preliminary and final plat as
submitted. Approval is subject to the conditions stated in the March 18, 2005, letter from
Mn Dot.
Commissioner Dierich seconded. Ayes — Ahlness, Desai, Dierich, Fischer,
Grover, Kaczrowski, Trippler
The motion passed.
This item goes to the city council on December 12, 2005.
SUMMARY
TO: City Manager
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Regions Sleep - Health Center
LOCATION: 2688 Maplewood Drive
DATE: November 30. 2005
INTRODUCTION
Agenda Item L5
Pope Architects is proposing to build a 7,084- square -foot, one -story building at 2688 Maplewood
Drive. This building would be a sleep - health center for Regions Hospital.
Requests
• A rezoning from R1 (single dwelling) to M1 (light manufacturing) for the back of the lot.
• A 20 -foot setback variance from the northerly property line. Code requires 50 feet.
• A conditional use permit (CUP) because the proposed building would be within 350 feet of
residential lot lines. The proposed building would be set back varying distances from these
lot lines at 55 feet (from northeast), 67 feet (from south) and 122 feet (from southeast).
• Approval of design plans.
DISCUSSION
Rezoning
The rezoning should be approved as it would comply with the comprehensive plan's designation
for M1 for this part of the property.
Setback Variance
Staff supports the proposed 20 -foot setback variance since it meets the findings required by
state law.
Conditional Use Permit
The CUP should be approved. This proposed use would be compatible with the residential
neighbors and meet the requirements for a CUP.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of all the requests noted above.
p:sec4 \Regions Sleep Center Summary
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Regions Sleep - Health Center
LOCATION: 2688 Maplewood Drive
DATE: November 30, 2005
Iki III Ill :is]11110 Ill [a]ki
Project Description
Pope Architects is proposing to build a 7,084- square -foot, one -story building at 2688 Maplewood
Drive. This building would be a sleep - health center for Regions Hospital. The proposed building
would have an exterior of brick, cement -board siding and asphalt shingles on a hip roof. Refer to
the attachments.
Requests
The applicant is requesting the following:
• A rezoning from R1 (single dwelling residential) to M1 (light manufacturing) for the back of
the lot which currently has residential zoning.
• A setback variance since the proposed building would be less than 50 feet from a
residential lot line. This applies only to the setback from the cabin property to the north.
The proposed building setback would be 30 feet. The building setback to other
residential neighbors would exceed the 50 -foot minimum.
A conditional use permit (CUP) for a reduced setback from residential property lines.
There are residential properties to the north, south and east. Some of the properties to
the north and south are developed residentially but are zoned M1. The code requires a
CUP for buildings in M1 districts that are closer than 350 feet to residentially -zoned
properties. The proposed building would be set back varying distances from these lot
lines at 55 feet, 67 feet and 122 feet.
• Approval of design plans.
Q 6.18111 :9 [a].I
Rezoning
The proposed rezoning to M1 would be in compliance with the comprehensive plan which already
designates this rear portion of the lot as M1. This proposal would also meet the requirements for
rezoning as outlined in the ordinance. It also makes sense for this property to have one zoning
to enable its logical and sensible development.
Setback Variance
City code requires that the proposed building be set back 50 feet from the northerly lot line
because of the adjacent cabins. This abutting property, however, is planned and zoned M1 for
commercial or industrial use. This property is also for sale. Therefore, its continued use as a
residential property is limited and likely to be short lived.
Staff supports the proposed 20 -foot setback variance since it meets the findings required by
state law. Providing a 50 -foot setback would cause the applicant undue hardship by requiring a
setback from a nonconforming use that is temporary and destined to be redeveloped with an M1
use. Approval of a variance would also be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance
since there would still be an ample 30 -foot setback from the northerly lot line.
Conditional Use Permit
The proposed use is allowed under the M1 zoning code. The reason for this CUP request is
because the westerly building would be within 350 feet of residential properties. In this situation,
the ordinance requires a CUP so the city council may consider special precautions due to
possible impacts on the abutting residential property. The usual concerns are to consider issues
like the potential for noise and any negative visual impacts.
Noise
Staff does not envision a problem with noise from this sleep center. This use should actually be
a very quiet neighbor. Staff questioned the applicant as to whether there would be any late -night
noise from cars and drivers in the parking lot. The applicant stated that this would not be a
problem. Patients would arrive in the early evening hours for preparation and then have their
sleep monitored throughout the night. There is no late night coming- and -going anticipated
according to the applicant.
The planning commission questioned what safeguard there might be for the neighborhood if a
future tenant or owner of this building not be so quite. The noise code requires that any business
occupying this building abide by the hours of noise prohibition. These hours of noise prohibition
are between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Saturday and all day Sunday. The code does
not limit the hours of operation, but rather limits the hours of noise making. If the use of the
proposed building changes, this future user must comply with the city's noise ordinance. Refer to
the attached noise control ordinance.
PIl3Ih7� ul'T�FSSi?
The proposed building would be attractive and would have a residential design. The only
concern staff has is that there be adequate parking lot screening next to the abutting residential
properties for the back parking lot.
Neighbor Concerns
The replies from neighbors were concerns with traffic noise from area auto dealers, the loss of
trees and the potential for any late -night disturbances. Refer to the citizen comments section of
this report for all of the comments received.
Building Design
The proposed building would be attractive and is designed to be compatible with the nearby
residential homes in the area. The building materials would be no- maintenance materials and
are proposed to have a variety of tan and brown color tones with a subtle green siding material.
Site Considerations
Parking
The applicant would meet the commercial parking ratio of one parking space for each 200 square
feet of floor area. This is the ratio applied to office, clinic and retail uses. The 36 spaces
proposed will meet code requirements for this sleep clinic.
The planning commission and the community design review board both recommended that the
applicant reduce the number of parking spaces on the site if they are all not needed. The
applicant agreed to provide a "proof -of- parking" or future parking area behind the building for 10
spaces. They propose a smaller parking lot now behind the building with seven spaces rather
than 17. Refer to the attached site plan revision.
Site Lighting
The photometric plan meets light- intensity maximum requirements. The applicant should take
care to make sure that the rear parking lot light has a concealed lens and bulb. Staff also
recommends that this lighting fixture be as subdued as possible emitting no more than a typical
residential yard or wall light to prevent any possible complaint from residential neighbors.
Landscaping
The proposed landscaping is attractive. Staff had recommended additional screening behind the
building in the north /northeast and the south /southeast sides of the rear parking lot. Now that the
applicant will reduce the size of the rear parking lot, this landscaping requirement is still needed.
The landscaping plan, though, should be revised to relate the smaller parking lot as now
proposed. City code requires that parking lots be screened with a six - foot -tall and 80 percent
opaque buffer.
Trash
An outdoor trash enclosure is proposed. The design of this structure should be submitted to staff
for approval. The construction and materials should match the building.
City Department Comments
Fire Marshal
Butch Gervais, the Maplewood Fire Marshal, made several comments. Refer to the attached
report from Mr. Gervais.
Police
Lieutenant Kevin Rabbett reviewed this proposal and stated the following:
"I have no significant public safety concerns. I am somewhat concerned that the 24 hour
operation is so close to the residential area. I anticipate complaints of noise from arriving and
departing vehicles, doors slamming, etc. I would recommend that a noise - controlling fence or
earthen berm be considered to minimize this type of complaint."
Building Official
Dave Fisher, Maplewood Building Official, reviewed this proposal. Refer to his report.
City Engineer
The main issue will be to make sure that the proposed infiltration pond meets the city's criteria for
stormwater retention and water quality. Refer to the attached report by Erin Laberee, the
assistant city engineer.
SUMMARY
Staff supports this proposal. This clinic would be an improvement to this site and the
neighborhood.
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
November 21, 2005: The planning commission recommended approval of the rezoning, setback
variance and CUP. In addition to the staff recommendation, the planning commission added
condition six which stated, "The applicant shall work with staff to eliminate or reduce the number
of parking stalls in the back of the building. This area shall be designated as "proof of parking."
The applicant shall make every attempt to provide 10- foot -wide parking stalls as suggested by
the planning commission. Handicap parking stalls shall comply with ADA requirements.
November 22, 2005: The community design review board recommended approval of the design
plans. The board also recommended that the applicant reduce the number of parking spaces as
did the planning commission. The board, however, recommended a minimum parking stall width
of 9 '/ feet as required by code for patient parking. With the elimination of all or part of the rear
parking lot, the board also recommended that the screening requirement in this area "be waived
or lessened in scope subject to the elimination or reduction in size of the back parking lot and its
designation as "proof of parking."
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution rezoning the back of 2688 Maplewood Drive from R1 (single dwelling
residential) to M1 (light manufacturing). This rezoning is based on the findings required
by code and also because the Maplewood Comprehensive Land Use Plan already guides
this property as M1.
B. Adopt the resolution approving a 20 -foot setback variance allowing the proposed Regions
Sleep - Health Center to be constructed 30 feet from the northerly lot line. Approval is
because:
1. Providing a 50 -foot setback would cause the applicant undue hardship by requiring a
setback from a nonconforming use that is temporary and destined to be redeveloped
with a complying M1 use.
This variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since
there would still be an ample 30 -foot setback from the northerly lot line.
C. Adopt the resolution approving a conditional use permit for 2688 Maplewood Drive for a
building in an M1 (light manufacturing) district that would be within 350 feet of residential
property. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the
following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the city has date - stamped October 27,
2005. The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started, or the proposed use utilized,
within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The
council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The parking lot lights for the rear parking lot must be of a style that has concealed
bulbs and lenses. This lighting must not give off more light than a typical residential
wall or yard light. Light- intensity maximums must meet code requirements.
5. Provide a revised parking lot screening plan for the rear parking lot that provides
screening that is at least six feet tall and 80 percent opaque on the north /northeast
and south /southeast sides.
6. The applicant shall work with staff to eliminate or reduce the number of parking stalls
in the back of the building. This area shall be designated as "proof of parking" or
"future parking." The applicant shall provide 9 '/- foot -wide spaces for patient parking
as required by code. Employee parking spaces may be 9 feet wide and shall be
signed as such. Handicap parking spaces shall comply with ADA (Americans with
Disabilities Act) requirements.
D. Approve the plans date - stamped October 27, 2005, for the proposed Regions Sleep -
Health Center at 2688 Maplewood Drive. Approval is subject to the applicant/developer
complying with the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Comply with all conditions of Erin Laberee's engineering report dated November 17,
2005.
3. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey /Washington Metro Watershed District before the
issuance of a building permit.
The applicant shall work with staff to eliminate or reduce the number of parking stalls
in the back of the building. This area shall be designated as "proof of parking" or
"future parking." The applicant shall provide 9 '/- foot -wide spaces for patient parking
as required by code. Employee parking spaces may be 9 feet wide and shall be
signed as such. Handicap parking spaces shall comply with ADA (Americans with
Disabilities Act) requirements.
5. Provide a revised parking lot screening plan for staff approval for the rear parking lot
that provides screening that is at least six feet tall and 80 percent opaque on the
north /northeast and south /southeast sides.
6. The applicant must provide an in- ground irrigation system as required by code. The
area around the pond does not need to be sprinklered.
The design of the trash enclosure shall be submitted to staff for approval. The
materials and colors of the enclosure shall match the building.
8. Provide cash escrow, in the amount of 150 percent of the cost of completing the
landscaping and exterior site improvements before the applicant shall obtain a
building permit.
9. The community design review board shall approve major changes to these plans.
Minor changes may be approved by staff.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed the 68 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site for their
opinions of this proposal. Of the 11 replies, four were in favor, two had no comment and five
were either opposed or gave miscellaneous comments
In Favor
1. As long as this Regions Center does not have ambulances coming to and from to disrupt
the residential area, I do not see a problem. (Binsfeld, 1268 County Road C)
2. As long as you don't cut the trees down at the end of my lot. I'm thinking you're not going
to be on my land, so I'm OK with it. (Novak, 2667 English Street)
3. 1 think it will be quieter and less disruptive than what is there now. (Buesing, 1247
Kohlman Avenue)
4. This proposal sounds just fine to me. (Berqual, 1270 Kohlman Avenue)
Opposed /Miscellaneous Comments
I'm more concerned about the traffic and sound of cars on the frontage road off of Duluth
with all the new car dealers building going on. The huge semi trucks are a nuisance also.
Continue to watch this concern. (Leonard, 2627 Duluth Street)
2. Concerned about hours. I don't understand if they will be open 12 hours or possibly 24 if
need be? (Peltier, 1236 Kohlman Avenue)
3. 1 would like six - foot -high privacy fence trees on your property cut down. (Pitt, 1237
County Road C)
4. (1) 1 don't want my property value to decrease! (2) I don't want my taxes to go up. (3) 1
already don't like the increase in traffic on County Road C and now the frontage road after
you allowed the Audi development. So more traffic is not appealing. Finally, why ask for
residents' input when it doesn't do any good? (Bertelsen, 2631 Duluth Street)
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 1.55 acres
Existing Use: Timber & Turf Outdoor Services, Inc.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Cabins on property zoned M1
South: North Star Auto Body and single dwellings
East: The back yards of residential properties
West: Highway 61
PLANNING
Land Use Plan: M1
Zoning: M1 and R1
Code Requirements
Section 44- 637(b) requires a CUP for buildings in M1 districts that would be within 350 feet of a
residential district.
Findings for CUP Approval
City code requires that to approve a CUP, the city council must base approval on the nine
required findings for approval. Refer to the attached resolution for a listing of these findings.
Findings for Variance Approval
State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance from the
zoning code:
Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
property under consideration.
The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship ", as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be
put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the
landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the
variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations
alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the
terms of the city code.
Findings for Rezoning Approval
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring
property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property
adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community,
where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers,
police and fire protection and schools.
APPLICATION DATE
We received the applications and plans for this proposal on October 27, 2005. State law
requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications. A decision on
this request is required by December 26, 2005.
p:sec4 \Regions Sleep Center 11'05
Attachments
1. Location and Zoning Map
2. Land Use Plan
3. Site and Landscaping Plan
4. Building Elevations
5. Rezoning Narrative dated October 17, 2005
6. Variance Statement dated October 17, 2005
7. Conditional Use Permit Narrative dated October 17, 2005
8. Building Official's Report dated October 31, 2005
9. Fire Marshal's Report dated November 1, 2005
10. Engineering Report dated November 17, 2005
11. Noise Control Ordinance
12. Revised Site Plan with Future Parking
13. Rezoning Resolution
14. Variance Resolution
15. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
16. Plans date - stamped October 27, 2005 (separate attachments)
0
0
o -:
o,:,
k
Q
Q
Q
g.
R
w
U
2
W
K
a
J
U
Location and Zoning Map a
Regions Sleep Health Center 10
2688 Maplewood Drive N
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
EJ
Loo
kOti rc
N ti9`� r
Im
CO r
61�! Q
o [
0 RAI
.a S ITE
Q v
RI
COUNTY ROAD C
II
LO Ln
C'4 N
y
2
f-
J
r CT
11
A
N
Land Use Map
Regions Sleep Health Center
2688 Maplewood Drive
a f y � y • y s
a
a
n
s
r9
t t—
W
ar r, ;` aw
rlww?�YIwM
Asp -.www
NORTH
AeAra f+�mr
U
4 i
N
a
a
n
s
r9
t t—
W
ar r, ;` aw
F
w
L
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
N
ftA ELEVATION
. w.
mss—_
.YYI. A3
a
a
n
s
m
c+
m
("1. T ATION . WE¢
�✓ 1 YA'
yN SOUTH ELEVATION r. m
ST ELEVATON
Attachment 5
October 17, 2005
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Rezoning Board
Regions Hospital
Sleep Health Center
Maplewood, Minnesota
PAI. Commission No. 26172 -05130
On behalf of Frauenshuh Companies, Pope Associates is submitting for your review and
approval, the rezoning of Parcel A for the proposed Sleep Health Center building to be
located on a site of approximately 1.55 acres on Maplewood Drive, just north of County
Road C, Maplewood, MN
Lm=- im=
Parcel A will be purchased with Parcel B as part of a proposed outpatient clinic for Regions
Hospital. The proposed building is a new 7,084 SF, freestanding, single -story outpatient
clinic.
The zoning change will promote the public welfare by developing the Parcel A as part of a
new facility for Regions Hospital.
This zoning change will not injure or detract from the use of the neighboring property or
from the character of the neighborhood because the proposed develop on Parcel B is
allowed in M -1 Light Manufacturing standards.
The proposed facility will have sewer and water line connections with the utilities located
within the Maplewood Drive right -of -way. All storm water run -off will be handled with a rain
garden and retention pond, prior to flowing into the city system.
If you have questions please feel free to call me at 651- 789 -1618 or via e-mail at
i i ohnson(dpooearch.com
Sincerely,
POPE ASSOCIATES INC
s Dch71S
Project Manager
r strssrmai�mcaae +v- z+'.cs�rs;�r�mtmuw i_;_4sao�
A S S O C I A T E S
Architects
Interior Designers
1255 Energy Park Drive
St. Paul, MN 55108 -5118
Phone: (651) 642-9200
Fax: (651) 642 -1101
www,popearch.com
14
Attachment 6
New
A S S O C I A T E 5
Architects
October 17, 2005 Interior Designers
Revised — October 24, 2005
Planning Commission
City of Maplewood.
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55108
Re: Zoning Code Variance
Regions Hospital
Sleep Health Center
Maplewood, Minnesota
PAI Commission No. 26172 -05130
On behalf of Frauenshuh Companies, Pope Associates is submitting for your review and
approval, a zoning code variance for a proposed Sleep Health Center building to be
located on a site of approximately 1.55 acres on Maplewood Drive, just north of County
Road C. Maplewood, MN
Variance Statement
We are requesting a zoning variance from the city code requiring a 50 feet building
setback and 20 foot parking setback from abutting property that is used as
residential along the north side of the property. The proposed facility has a 28 -foot
building setback and a 6 -foot parking lot setback along the north property line. The
proposed building extends 21 feet into the 50-foot setback. The proposed parking
lot extends 14 feet Into the 20 -foot setback
The proposed building is a new 7,084 SF, freestanding, single-story outpatient clinic with
parking for 36 spaces. We are requesting a Zoning Cade Variance to comply with M -1
Light Manufacturing. A Zoning Code Variance has been requested based on the following
two reasons.
1. Strict enforcement of the City ordinance would cause building and parking
setbacks restricting the building size and parking count. The proposed property
and parcels immediately north and south of the property are zoned for Light
Manufacturing (M -1). However, private residences exist on the parcels
immediately north and south of the property, creating Residential Land Use
setbacks for building and parking.
2, The proposed variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance as set forth for development within a Light Manufacturing zone. It is
our understanding that this property and adjacent properties are to be developed
as M -1 Light Manufacturing and BC Business Commercial District.
1255 Energy Park Drive
St. Paul, MN 55108 -5118
Phone: (651) 642-9200
Fax (651) 642 -1101
www,popearch.com
15
If you have questions please feel free to call ghe at 651 - 789 -1616 or vi e-mail e-mail at
ii ohnson0popearch.com
Sincerely,
P WE OCI ES tNC
John
Project Manager
o: �rnrttwnmcoxaysa�roaysmehn�uu�dna i a os.dou
w
Attachment 7
r
Architects
Interior Designers
October 17, 2005
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Conditional Use Permit
Regions Hospital
Sleep Health Center
Maplewood, Minnesota
PAI Commission No. 62335 -05130
On behalf of Frauenshuh Companies, Pope Associates is submitting for your review and
approval, the application for a Conditional Use Permit for the proposed Sleep Health
Center building to be located on a site of approximately 1.55 acres on Maplewood Drive,
just north of County Road C, Maplewood, MN
Conditional Use Permit Narrative
We are requesting a Conditional Use Permit because the proposed building would be
closer than 350 feet to a residential district.
The intended use of the property is an outpatient Sleep Health Center clinic for Regions
Hospital. The facility will be a 7,000 sq. ft, single story building with 36 parking stalls. The
facility includes 12 patient rooms, 2 exam rooms and supporting office and service spaces.
Patients will be monitored while they sleep to diagnose sleep disorders. The patients
typical visit to the clinic will be about 12 hours; some may stay as long as 24 hours.
The proposed facllily would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to
conform to the city's M -1 Light Manufacturing zone. It's use and design would be
consistent with the existing character of the adjacent commercial facilities. It is not
expected to depredate property values for this site or any adjacent site. The proposed
landscaping will create visual enhancement of the site, also providing required screening
from adjacent residential usage properties.
The proposed facility would re- develop the site to include a new building, parking area,
landscaping and stormwater filtrationfretention system. The facility will be full sprinklered
and connected via a fire alarm to local fire departments. The facility will be operational 24
hours a day for 6 days a week. All doors will be locked for off - hours, and fitted with security
system for safety.
The use of the proposed facility would generate minimal vehicular traffic on local streats.
The drive entrance would be mated near the existing drive entrance, not creating vehicular
congestion anywhere else along the right -of -way.
1255 Energy Park Drive
St. Paul, MN 55108 -5118
Phone: (651) 642-9200
Fax: (651) 642 -1101
www.popearch.com
'17
If you have questions please feel free to call ma at 651 - 789 -1616 or via e-mail at
5ohnnson6Z000earch.com
Sincerely,
OPE ASSOC' INC
Johnson AIA
Project Manager
o:k7537 MnmcuRRM- 24Xcur sut r� nd, mm 1_t_05.a«
Attachment-8
Memo
To: Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner
From: David Fisher, Building Official
Re: Regions Hospital The Sleep Health Center, Proposed
Building
October 31, 2005
A complete building code analysis will be required when
plans are submitted for permit.
The building is required to be fire sprinklered and to meet
NFPA 13.
Separate male and female restrooms will be required on
each floor.
The new building must be built to meet 2000 IBC, Minnesota
State Building Code and the Minnesota State Energy Code.
I would recommend a pre - construction meeting with the
building department.
19
Attachment 9
Plan Review Comments
Date: l l /l/2005
Project: Regions Sleep Center
Planner: Tom Ekstrand
Reviewed by: Butch Gervais, Fire Marshal
Comments:
1. Need 20 ft emergency access road
2. Fire Protection System pre -codes and monitored
3. Proper marking of door where fire protection system is located
4. Fire Alarm System pre -code (NFPA 72) which requires mini sounders and strobes
in all sleep areas
5. Floor Plan required at main entrance
`Ill
Attachment 10
Engineerine Plan Review
PROJECT: Regions Sleep Center
PROJECT NO:
REVIEWED BY: Erin Laberee, Maplewood Engineering Department
DATE: November 17, 2005
The Regions Sleep Center is proposing to develop 2688 Maplewood Drive. The
development lies within the shoreland district for Kohlman Lake, which is a class IV
water body. According the Maplewood City Code the maximum impervious surface area
allowed is 30 %. An additional 20% of impervious surface may be allowed if the site
incorporates significant best management practices. The proposed impervious area has
been calculated to 40% coverage. A large infiltration basin has been designed as a best
management practice to infiltrate 2 inches of runoff from the site. The applicant needs to
provide soil boring information to ensure the infiltration basin will be effective. If the
soils are adequate for infiltration and the following requirements are addressed, it is
recommended that the 10% bonus for impervious area be allowed.
Drainage
1. The infiltration basin drains to the Mn/DOT storm sewer system The applicant
must submit hydraulic calculations to Mn/DOT Hydraulics for approval.
2. The developer and engineer shall ensure that there are adequate soils to allow for
infiltration. A soil boring shall be done in the vicinity of the infiltration basin and
submitted to the city to ensure the soils are conducive to infiltration.
3. The engineer shall increase the infiltration basin depth by one foot for additional
storage capacity.
4. A rock sump shall be added to the infiltration basin. Depending on the soils, the
rock sump shall be 3 to 6 feet deep and approximately 30 square feet in area. The
top of the rock sump shall sit approximately 8 inches below the finished basin
elevation and consist of 1.5 inch clean crushed rock and encased in geotextile
filter fabric. The bottom of the basin shall be scarified 12 inches.
5. Mn/DOT seed mixture 350 NGR shall be used about the normal water level in the
infiltration basin.
6. An additional catch basin shall be added at the west end of the driveway to direct
runoff from the driveway entrance into the sediment forebay.
7. The developer shall enter into a maintenance agreement for the annual cleaning
and maintenance of the sediment forebay and infiltration basin
21
Utilities
1. Plans shall be submitted to Saint Paul Regional Water Service for their approval.
2. The 6" sanitary sewer service shall connect into the city's sanitary sewer with a
wye connection instead of a direct connection in the manhole.
3. The developer shall enter into a developer's agreement for the utility construction
proposed within the city's right of way.
Permits
1. The applicant shall obtain a Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed permit, a
NPDES permit and a permit from the city for grading activities.
2. A MCES permit shall be obtained for the sanitary service connection.
22
.Attachment 11
I
ENVIRONMENT § 18 -112
Sec. 18-85. Police records.
The police department shall keep a record of all vehicles impounded under this division, and
the record shall contain the following:
(1) The manufacturer's trade name or make;
(2) Vehicle identification and license numbers;
(3) The name of the owner of such vehicle and of all persons claiming the vehicle;
(4) Such other descriptive matter as may identify such vehicle;
(5) The nature and circumstances of the impounding of the vehicle; and
(6) The violation, if any, on account of which such vehicle was impounded.
(Code 1982, § 19 -47)
Secs. 18.86 -18 -110. Reserved.
DIVISION 3. NOISE CONTROL
Sec. 18.111. Prohibition generally; exception.
(a) No person shall make or cause to be made any distinctly and loudly audible noise that
unreasonably annoys, disturbs, injures or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety
or welfare of any person or precludes such person's enjoyment of property or affects such
person's property values. If the event or activity is sponsored by the city or is authorized and
has a permit for such activity issued by the city, this prohibition does not apply. This general
prohibition is not limited by the specific restriction of subsection (b) of this section. Any
violation of this general prohibition between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday —
Saturday and all day Sunday is a per se violation of this division.
(b) The city manager may waive the requirement in subsection (a) of this section where the
activity would not cause a nuisance and where the proposed activity would not be within 350
feet of a residential use. The city manager's decision may be appealed to the city council. A
waiver within 350 feet of a residential use must be approved by the city council. The property
owners within 350 feet of the proposed activity shall be notified of the waiver request at least
ten days before the council meeting. A list of the property owners, certified by an abstract
company or the county abstract office, shall be submitted with the waiver request.
(Code 1982, § 19 -48)
Sec. 18 -112. Construction activities.
All construction activities, including the use of any kind of electric, diesel or gas- powered
machine or other power equipment, shall be subject to this division. A copy of this division shall
CD18:17
23
P
M
I
I
yy Onow MJ
�T�iI PN w.i.j
m
a ®w iX m uoV rw
w��±R wR�Ryg�����n�agaw����yyay��gy{{m��Fl.�a�iw as
awz�n `aR
aynY &au aw
243 mmr-- =AMR- .mewn-
a���� R.wwa,w,wnw.n
uRexaRa�ww
�am���f��uufaR ®S iflfl®m�b.seLV .h �,w. ',.
meFAY R,Iwamq gy,wMIINMC90M
aao
z0
MAIO LL— LAMMEE
OMN GRMP
�R yram
C
N m
C
ti
.ao
rco
_
a7. I
'
J J /
f {
+
/
+
P
M
I
I
yy Onow MJ
�T�iI PN w.i.j
m
a ®w iX m uoV rw
w��±R wR�Ryg�����n�agaw����yyay��gy{{m��Fl.�a�iw as
awz�n `aR
aynY &au aw
243 mmr-- =AMR- .mewn-
a���� R.wwa,w,wnw.n
uRexaRa�ww
�am���f��uufaR ®S iflfl®m�b.seLV .h �,w. ',.
meFAY R,Iwamq gy,wMIINMC90M
aao
z0
MAIO LL— LAMMEE
OMN GRMP
�R yram
C
N m
C
ti
REVISED SITE PLAN
rQ
WITH "FUTURE PARKING"
aRwkw�an
tln..M
;�wR.wr
L1
e�P
REVISED SITE PLAN
rQ
WITH "FUTURE PARKING"
Attachment 13
RESOLUTION: ZONING MAP CHANGE
WHEREAS, Pope Associates applied for a change in the zoning map from R1 (single
dwelling residential) to M1 (light manufacturing).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property at 2688 Maplewood Drive.
The legal description is:
Back portion of the parcel (Parcel A):
The South 189.50 feet Lot 6, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, as measured at a right angle to the
South line of said Lot 6, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office
of the County Recorder Ramsey County, Minnesota.
Front portion of the parcel (Parcel B):
Commencing at a point on the West line of Lot 6, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, and 200 feet
South of the Northwest corner of said Lot 6; thence West on a line parallel to the South line of
Section 4, Township 29, North, Range 22 West, to a point on the Easterly line of the White Bear
Road known as Highway Number One; thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly side of
said White Bear Road to a point 383.8 feet North of the South line of Section 4; thence East on a
line 383.8 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Section 4 to a point on the West line
of said Lot 6; thence North along the West line of said Lot 6 to the point of beginning, Ramsey
County, Minnesota.
Abstract Property (Parcel A)
Torrens Property (Parcel B)
Torrens Certificate No. 530624
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
On November 21, 2005, the planning commission held a public hearing to
consider this rezoning. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission
gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written
statements. The planning commission recommended that the City Council
approve the change.
On December 12, 2005, the city council reviewed this rezoning and
the change. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the
city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council the above -
described change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the
zoning code.
The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of
neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use
of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is
adequately safeguarded.
The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the
community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient,
and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water,
sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
The Maplewood Comprehensive Plan already designates this property for M1.
The Maplewood City Council this resolution on December 12, 2005.
W
Attachment 14
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Pope Associates has applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to 2688 Maplewood Drive. The legal description for the
portion of the subject lot to be rezoned (Parcel A) is:
Back portion of the parcel (Parcel A):
The South 189.50 feet Lot 6, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, as measured at a right angle to the
South line of said Lot 6, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office
of the County Recorder Ramsey County, Minnesota.
Front portion of the parcel (Parcel B):
Commencing at a point on the West line of Lot 6, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, and 200 feet
South of the Northwest corner of said Lot 6; thence West on a line parallel to the South line of
Section 4, Township 29, North, Range 22 West, to a point on the Easterly line of the White Bear
Road known as Highway Number One; thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly side of
said White Bear Road to a point 383.8 feet North of the South line of Section 4; thence East on a
line 383.8 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Section 4 to a point on the West line
of said Lot 6; thence North along the West line of said Lot 6 to the point of beginning, Ramsey
County, Minnesota.
Abstract Property (Parcel A)
Torrens Property (Parcel B)
Torrens Certificate No. 530624
WHEREAS, Section 44 -20( c)(6)(b) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires that
commercial buildings be set back at least 50 feet from a residential lot line.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to construct a commercial building with a 30 -foot
setback from a residential lot line.
WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 20 feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On November 21, 2005, the planning commission recommended that the city
council approve this variance. The planning commission held a public hearing.
City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners as required by law. The planning commission gave
everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements.
The city council reviewed this request on December 12, 2005. The council
considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council the above -
described variance for the following reasons:
Providing a 50 -foot setback would cause the applicant undue hardship by
requiring a setback from a nonconforming use that is temporary and destined to
be redeveloped with a complying, M1 use.
2. This variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since
there would still be an ample 30 -foot setback from the northerly lot line.
The Maplewood City Council this variance on December 12, 2005.
Q]
Attachment 15
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Pope Associates applied for a conditional use permit to construct a
commercial building within 350 feet of residentially -zoned property. The proposed building
would be set back varying distances from abutting residential lot lines at distances of 55 feet,
67 feet and 122 feet.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2688 Maplewood Drive. The legal description is:
Back portion of the parcel (Parcel A)
The South 189.50 feet Lot 6, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, as measured at a right angle to the
South line of said Lot 6, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office
of the County Recorder Ramsey County, Minnesota.
Front portion of the parcel (Parcel B):
Commencing at a point on the West line of Lot 6, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, and 200 feet
South of the Northwest corner of said Lot 6; thence West on a line parallel to the South line of
Section 4, Township 29, North, Range 22 West, to a point on the Easterly line of the White Bear
Road known as Highway Number One; thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly side of
said White Bear Road to a point 383.8 feet North of the South line of Section 4; thence East on a
line 383.8 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Section 4 to a point on the West line
of said Lot 6; thence North along the West line of said Lot 6 to the point of beginning, Ramsey
County, Minnesota.
Abstract Property (Parcel A)
Torrens Property (Parcel B)
Torrens Certificate No. 530624
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
On November 21, 2005, the planning commission recommended that the city
council approve this permit. The planning commission held a public hearing. City
staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property
owners as required by law. The planning commission gave everyone at the
hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The city council reviewed this request on December 12, 2005. The council
considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above -
described conditional use permit because:
The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
All construction shall follow the site plan that the city has date - stamped October 27,
2005. The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started, or the proposed use utilized,
within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The
council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The parking lot lights for the rear parking lot must be of a style that has concealed
bulbs and lenses. This lighting must not give off more light than a typical residential
wall or yard light. Light- intensity maximums must meet code requirements.
Provide a revised parking lot screening plan for the rear parking lot that provides
screening that is at least six feet tall and 80 percent opaque on the north /northeast
and south /southeast sides.
The applicant shall work with staff to eliminate or reduce the number of parking stalls
in the back of the building. This area shall be designated as "proof of parking" or
"future parking." The applicant shall provide 9 '/- foot -wide spaces for patient parking
as required by code. Employee parking spaces may be 9 feet wide and must be
signed as such. Handicap parking spaces shall comply with ADA (Americans with
Disabilities Act) requirements.
The Maplewood City Council this resolution on December 12, 2005.
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2005
a. Regions Hospital Sleep Health Center (2688 Maplewood Drive) (7:30 — 8:13 p.m.)
Mr. Ekstrand said Pope Architects is proposing to build a 7,084- square -foot, one -story
building at 2688 Maplewood Drive. This building would be a sleep - health center for Regions
Hospital. The proposed building would have an exterior of brick, cement -board siding and
asphalt shingles on a hip roof.
Commissioner Trippler asked if the cabin did not exist and there was a manufacturing facility
there, then the 50 -foot setback would not exist, correct?
Mr. Ekstrand said correct.
Commissioner Trippler said he understands the cabins are for sale but could the person who
will be the new owner of the cabin property sell the property so a house could be built on the
property?
Mr. Ekstrand said no. The new owners could let the existing cabin use continue but it's not
marketed as such.
Commissioner Trippler said even though the cabin property is for sale doesn't mean the
cabins are going away then?
Mr. Ekstrand said correct. It would be nice if the cabin site could be incorporated with this
proposal or with the Angus Meats property to the north but that doesn't mean the cabin
property couldn't be sold just as it is.
Commissioner Trippler asked if when staff discussed the location of the building with the
developer, did they discuss shifting the footprint of the building to the south 10 to 15 feet so
there wouldn't need to be a 20 -foot setback?
Mr. Ekstrand said no. The cabins to the north are non - conforming and temporary. The cabin
property owners shouldn't be punished for a shorter setback but staff feels the site will
redevelop with something else in the future and staff felt a 30 -foot setback would be
adequate.
Commissioner Trippler asked what if there would be a metal stamping business with loud
machines there? Then that wouldn't be enough of a setback in order for people to sleep
during the day. He said it may be in the best interest of the applicant to center the business
on the property.
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 11 -21 -05
Commissioner Ahlness said when businesses are this close to a residential area there is
usually a condition in the report that states no business operation from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m.
Monday through Saturday and no business operations on Sunday. He said he understands
the characterization of this business is such that it is not practical to put those restraints on
this business, but how did or didn't staff consider that ordinance with this proposal?
Staff explained that the planning commission recently reviewed the proposal for the Maple
Leaf Ridge office condominiums on the other side of Highway 61. For that development, being
so close to residential, there is the potential for noise concerns. Staff's biggest concern in this
case is the potential for voices in the rear parking lot or car doors slamming. However, the
applicant told staff that those concerns would not be a factor. Staff sees the disturbance as
very minimal and controllable, therefore staff did not go into those types of conditions.
Commissioner Ahlness said in that case shouldn't there be some action that allows them to
operate outside the aspects of the ordinance rather than not addressing it at all? It's an
ordinance that is in place, and the city can't just say because you're a sleep center you don't
have to pay attention to the ordinance.
Mr. Ekstrand said that is true and the ordinance is still in place whether staff mentions it in
the conditions or not, however, it may have been fruitful to mention.
Commissioner Ahlness said the applicant should have a variance that allows them to operate.
His concern is not so much for the nature of the business and making the assumption that the
sleep center will operate in the manor that staff said, but if the use should change over time
from a sleep center into something else, he thinks it is important that the property owner or
applicant understand the exception or the variance for that ordinance only existed for the
sleep center and would need to be reviewed for a new use. If they sell the business to a metal
stamping company the ordinance would come into full effect. To say that obviously this use is
going to be very conducive and there would not be very much noise, he feels the city can't
just ignore the statement.
Mr. Ekstrand said the variance is for a setback and there would be no variance given for
noise.
Commissioner Ahlness said the noise is built on no operating the business during the off
hours.
Commissioner Trippler said in looking at the ordinances for M1 (light manufacturing) in some
cases the ordinances have specific hours of operation associated with them, Monday through
Saturday 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. and no operation on Sunday. That doesn't exist in M1 zoning and
there are no specific designated hours of operation.
Mr. Ekstrand said the business can operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but the noise
ordinance is in place whether staff mentions it or not. When staff writes the staff report, if they
think something isn't an issue it doesn't get discussed. Staff did not feel noise was an issue.
Therefore staff didn't go into the noise ordinance in the depth that was done for the Maple
Leaf Ridge business condominiums.
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 11 -21 -05
Commissioner Ahlness asked if that only applied for business commercial or is it by use?
Mr. Ekstrand said the noise ordinance applies all over the city for all uses. If there was noise
in the middle of the night somebody would call the police and the police would tell the
appropriate person or company there were complaints made, and the police would enforce
the ordinance.
Commissioner Trippler said the city has a noise ordinance that pertains to no noise from
10:00 p.m. until 6:00 a.m. no matter where it is in the city, and if you complain, the police will
enforce it.
Commissioner Ahlness said he will take that off line because he knows there is an ordinance
that says businesses can't operate between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. and it was recently discussed
at the planning commission meeting for the Maple Leaf Ridge Business Park. He is just
concerned if for some reason in the future the sleep center left and another business were to
take over what safeguards would occur to ensure the new owners followed the city ordinances
to protect the residential area.
Mr. Ekstrand said one business that has had complaints from the neighbors is the St Paul
Pioneer Press building. People were slamming doors, talking, and carts were clanking while
getting the newspaper deliveries ready for the morning, which was very disruptive to the
surrounding residents. With office /warehouse type centers the city doesn't know who will
occupy those spaces, and the city tries to safeguard against noise issues as best they can.
He didn't fear any issues with this particular proposal so he didn't go into such depth because
of the nature of the sleep center business. The building isn't suited for industry. It's more of a
clinic or office use. If a heavier use were to be proposed, the city would have to apply the
zoning and the applicant would have to go through the approval process again.
Commissioner Dierich asked how many patients the sleep center would have per night and
how many staff members there would be on a per shift basis? Is there a possibility that the
parking area on the rear of the property could be dedicated for staff use only so there would
not be a lot of traffic in and out? Does the applicant need all the parking shown on the plan?
Could they have less parking and provide proof of parking?
Mr. Ekstrand said the applicant can address the question regarding the number of patients
and employees. The city could recommend that the rear parking spaces be designated for
employees. The number of parking spaces meets the city ordinance and the applicant may
not need all of those parking spaces. The applicant could eliminate some of the parking
spaces and provide proof of parking, maybe even some of the rear parking lot could be shown
as proof of parking providing more grass.
Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant to address the commission.
Mr. James Johnson, AIA, Project Manager for Pope Associates, 1255 Energy Park Drive, St.
Paul, addressed the commission. He deferred the questions asked by Ms. Dierich to Mr. Brian
Fisher.
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 11 -21 -05
Mr. Brian Fisher, Lead Technologist for Regions Sleep- Center. He is responsible for the day -
to -day operations at the sleep center. He said there would be a maximum of 12 patients per
night and a maximum of 7 staff members equaling 19 cars a night in the parking lot. The staff
starts at 7:00 p.m. and patients are scheduled to arrive about 7:30 p.m. This is a 24- hour -a-
day operation, however the traffic usually occurs about 7:00 p.m. and ends about 8:00 a.m.
when the patients are leaving. As far as daytime operations, there would be about 4 patients
during the day for testing with 6 staff members on the day shift.
Commissioner Trippler asked if the applicant would be comfortable with less parking than
what is shown on the plan?
Mr. Johnson said from a staff perspective they wouldn't need that many parking spaces, and
from a patient perspective they would be happy with fewer parking spaces.
Commissioner Trippler said the city allows for proof of parking, and the area designated in the
back may work as proof of parking. As time goes by, if you needed more parking the city
would allow you to develop the additional parking. The city is trying to limit the amount of
impervious surface so there isn't as much runoff. He said he noticed the applicant had 9' /z -
feet -wide parking spaces shown on the plan and said he prefers to see 10 -foot wide parking
spaces. If the applicant can make that change, he would appreciate it.
Chairperson Fischer asked if anyone in the audience wanted to address the commission.
Ms. Angela Evian, 1243 County Road C East, Maplewood, addressed the commission. Ms.
Evian asked if the berm that is behind her residence is going to be taken down because it's
about 10 to 15 feet tall with trees planted on top. If so, will there be a fence to keep people out
of the yard? With the berm you can't see the landscaping business that is there right now.
Mr. Ekstrand said when he visited the site he didn't see the berm but he wasn't looking at
things from her advantage point either. The city could recommend a fence, but if the applicant
decides to eliminate some of the parking and there is proof of parking, the area would be
sodded. The trash enclosure shown is behind Ms. Evian's property, but there may be an
opportunity to put that elsewhere. It looks like there is room for adjustment here, especially if
the rear parking lot is eliminated for proof of parking behind Ms. Evian's property.
Mr. Floyd Peltier, 1250 Kohlman Avenue, Maplewood, addressed the commission. His lot runs
next to the lot for the sleep center. He asked if someone could give him a better explanation
regarding the 350 -foot setback.
Mr. Ekstrand said the 350 -foot setback is a city code requirement that says if the building is
closer than 350 feet from residential it allows the city council to attach conditions to the
property to protect the residents.
Mr. Peltier said there is too much noise coming from the landscaping business already. He
asked if the sleep center business will be quieter.
Mr. Ekstrand said the sleep center will be much quieter compared to the landscaping
business.
Planning Commission -5-
Minutes of 11 -21 -05
Mr. Peltier said good, then he is "for" this development. He asked if the trash area would be
fenced in?
Mr. Ekstrand said the dumpster would be enclosed.
Mr. Ron Dick spoke on behalf of Irene Bartlett, the owner of the cabins on the property to the
north, and addressed the commission. Ms. Bartlett had a question regarding the 50 -foot
setback and which side it's on?
Mr. Ekstrand explained what the 50 -foot setback means and pointed it out on the monitor to
help Ms. Bartlett better understand the requirement.
Chairperson Fischer asked if anybody else wanted to address the commission.
Nobody came forward.
Chairperson Fischer closed the public hearing portion of the meeting.
Commissioner Grover said based on the number of patients and employees, the front parking
lot would not accommodate everyone, so there may still be a requirement for some of the rear
parking spaces.
Commissioner Trippler said the applicant could develop half of the rear parking lot which
would take the parking lot out of the parcel that is designated as R1.
Commissioner Trippler moved to adopt the resolution rezoning the back of 2688 Maplewood
Drive from R1 (single dwelling residential) to M1 (light manufacturing). This rezoning is based
on the findings required by code and also because the Maplewood Comprehensive Land Use
Plan already guides this property as M1.
Commissioner Trippler moved to adopt the resolution approving a 20 -foot setback variance
allowing the proposed Regions Sleep - Health Center to be constructed 30 feet from the
northerly lot line. Approval is because:
1. Providing a 50 -foot setback would cause the applicant undue hardship by requiring a
setback from a nonconforming use that is temporary and destined to be redeveloped
with a complying, M1 use.
2. This variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since there
would be an ample 30 -foot setback from the northerly lot line.
Planning Commission -6-
Minutes of 11 -21 -05
Commissioner Trippler moved to adopt the resolution approving a conditional use permit for
2688 Maplewood Drive for a building in an M1 (light manufacturing) district that would be
within 350 feet of residential property. Approval is based on the findings required by
ordinance and subject to the following conditions: (changes made bythe PC are underlined
if added.)
All construction shall follow the site plan that the city has date - stamped October 27,
2005. The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started, or the proposed use utilized,
within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The
council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The parking lot lights for the rear parking lot must be of a style that has concealed bulbs
and lenses. This lighting must not give off more light than a typical residential wall or
yard light. Light- intensity maximums must meet code requirements.
5. Provide a revised parking lot screening plan for the rear parking lot that provides
screening that is at least six feet tall and 80 percent opaque on the north /northeast and
south /southeast sides.
6. The aoDlicant shall work with staff to eliminate or reduce the number of Darkina stalls in
the back of the building. This area shall be redesignated as "proof of parking." The
applicant shall make every attempt to provide 10- foot -wide parking stalls as suggested
by the Dlannina commission. Handicap Darkina stalls shall comDly with ADA
requirements
Commissioner Grover seconded. Ayes — Ahlness, Desai, Dierich, Fischer,
Grover, Kaczrowski, Trippler
The motion passed.
This item goes to the city council on December 12, 2005.
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2005
a. Regions Sleep - Health Center
Mr. Ekstrand said Pope Architects is proposing to build a 7,084- square -foot, one -story building
at 2688 Maplewood Drive. This building would be sleep - health center for Regions Hospital.
The proposed building would have an exterior of brick, cement -board siding and asphalt
shingles on a hip roof.
Mr. Ekstrand distributed the engineering report dated November 17, 2005, by Erin Laberee,
Assistant City Engineer, and the revised staff recommendations dated November 22, 2005.
Mr. Ekstrand said the planning commission recommended increasing the parking space width
from 9' /z feet wide to 10 feet wide.
Board member Shankar asked if we really need 10 -foot wide parking spaces for a sleep
center?
Mr. Ekstrand said that was only a request of a planning commissioner. The code states the
parking space width shall be 9' /z feet wide for this type of use. Employee parking can be 9 feet
wide.
Board member Shankar asked what the reason was for the recommendation for a 10 foot wide
space verses the standard 9' /z foot wide parking space?
Mr. Ekstrand said the 10 -foot wide parking space was recommended because a comment was
made that dings get put in car doors with 9 wide parking spaces.
Mr. Ekstrand said a parking space at 10 feet wide is very generous these days although that is
what is recommended for retail parking due to more space being needed to get in and out of
cars with packages. Some people are more conservative than others.
Board member Olson said she would recommend 10 -foot wide parking spaces because these
people will have an overnight bag or luggage and maybe even medical equipment with them.
Getting out of their car may be easier and give them more space if there were wider parking
spaces at this sleep disorder center.
Board member Ledvina said the CDRB tries to reduce the amount of impervious surface in
developments and widening the parking spaces only increases the amount of impervious
surface.
Mr. Ekstrand says that's a very good point, this is within a shoreland district and the applicant
is meeting a bonus to go beyond the 30% maximum impervious surface coverage that would
normally be allowed in this area. It could go up to 50% coverage if they were providing
adequate on -site methods of collecting storm water and purifying it. The applicant is at 41%
Community Design Review Board 2
Minutes 11 -22 -2005
coverage now. Ms. Laberee's engineering report covers that information and she makes some
recommendations regarding these issues.
Chairperson Longrie asked the applicant to address the board.
Mr. James Johnson, AIA, Project Manager for Pope Associates, 1255 Energy Park Drive, St.
Paul, addressed the board. This is a residential looking facility. Parking is needed for a
maximum load of 12 patients and 7 employees on a nightly basis.
Board member Hinzman asked if the parking needs are sufficient if parking is reduced?
Mr. Johnson said yes.
The CDRB agreed this is a very attractive building.
Chairperson Longrie said she is comfortable with the 9 wide parking spaces and the
number of reduced parking based on the number of employees and visitors to this building on
a nightly basis. She would prefer to reduce the amount of impervious surface as Board
member Ledvina said.
Board member Hinzman moved to approve the plans date - stamped October 27, 2005, for the
proposed Regions Sleep - Health Center at 2688 Maplewood Drive. Approval is subject to the
applicant/developer complying with the following conditions: Revised plans date - stamped
November 22, 2005. Changes made by the CDRB are underlined if added and stricken if
deleted.)
Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Comply with all conditions of Erin Laberee's engineering report dated November 17,
2005.
3. Obtain a permit from the Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District before the
issuance of a building permit.
4. The applicant shall work with staff to eliminate or reduce the number of parking stalls in
the back of the building. This area shall be redesignated as "proof of parking." The
applicant shall make e very attempt to p W- foot -wide parkin stalls a sugg estad
by t planning . Handicap parking stalls shall comply with ADA
requirements.
5. Provide a revised parking lot screening plan for staff approval for the rear parking lot
that provides screening that is at least six feet tall and 80 percent opaque on the
north /northeast and south /southeast sides. This requirement may be waived or
lessened in scope subject to the elimination or reduction in size of the back parking lot
and its redesignation as "proof of parking."
6. The applicant must provide an in- ground irrigation system as required by code. The
area around the pond does not need to be sprinklered.
Community Design Review Board 3
Minutes 11 -22 -2005
7. The design of the trash enclosure shall be submitted to staff for approval. The materials
and colors of the enclosure shall match the building.
8. Provide cash escrow, in the amount of 150 percent of the cost of completing the
landscaping and exterior site improvements before the applicant shall obtain a building
permit.
9. The community design review board shall approve major changes to these plans. Minor
changes may be approved by staff.
Board member Ledvina seconded. Ayes — Hinzman, Ledvina, Longrie, Olson,
Shankar
The motion passed.
This item goes to the city council on December 12, 2005.
Agenda Item L6
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson. Director of Parks and Recreation
DATE: December 6, 2005 for the December 12 City Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Afton Heights Park Wetland Restoration Order
IIL III I :IQ 111L911IQL1
Afton Heights is a 12 -acre, youth athletic /neighborhood park located at 63 Sterling Street North in
southern Maplewood. Afton Heights Park has served southern Maplewood and the entire community
for 30 -plus years with no significant improvements since 1974. In June 2004, the Maplewood city
council approved the master plan and awarded the bid to Carl Bolander & Sons to complete the
redevelopment process at Afton Heights Park. The budget for Afton Heights Park was $800,000 with
the monies coming from the park development fund and a $100,000 grant from Ramsey County for
the construction of two new soccer fields.
BACKGROUND
Afton Heights Park was completed in August 2005. Afton Heights Park is located directly east of
Battle Creek Park, which drops approximately 80 feet west to the parking lot and swimming complex
In mid - August we experienced a significant rainfall somewhere between six and eight inches which
caused severe erosion of the eastern bank, ultimately impacting a small wetland in Battle Creek Park
The erosion was significant. Staff immediately addressed the issue with increased hay bales and
temporary measures to alleviate future erosion.
As part of the gully erosion, sediment was deposited onto the wetland causing an impact to its
inherent function and value. The city received a wetland restoration order from the Soil and Water
Conservation District on November 28 requiring the city to remove the sedimentation and repair the
erosion gullies.
When the city's initial breach of the hillside was discovered following the rainfall, the city retained
Short Elliot & Hendrickson (SEH) to develop an assessment of the erosion and begin determining
both a short -term and long -term resolution. During the past two months I have worked with
representatives from SEH, the city public works department and Brauer & Associates, as well as our
original contractor, Carl Bolander & Sons, to determine a formal final solution. The initial proposed
solution was extremely complex and was estimated to be $300,000 -plus.
After reviewing the site and analyzing other possible solutions, a more modest resolution has been
proposed. The estimated cost has been reduced by 50 percent to $150,000 or less.
The wetland restoration order requires the city to restore the wetland and erosion by January 15. Staff
has scheduled a meeting with the key players for Thursday, December 8, at 11 a.m. to sign off on the
proposed resolution and begin the correction process.
Given the emergency status of this issue, staff is requesting that council declare the wetland
restoration order an emergency and direct staff to complete the corrections as designed by Short
Elliott and Hendrickson utilizing the city's original contractor Carl Bolander & Sons on a time and
material basis. The cost for the corrections will initially be paid through the park development fund.
Once the final numbers are determined, the city will begin determining the appropriate percentages of
who is responsible for the gully erosion and drainage corrections.
N xK1LVihVil4 L ULA I M L1
Staff recommends that the wetland restoration order as outlined in the November 28, 2005 letter be
completed with the monies to be allocated from the park development fund. It is further understood
that staff will negotiate a resolution of the correction fees to pay back a portion if not all of the
correction costs based on the SEH independent findings.
kph \wetland restoration order.aRon heights.parks.mem
Enclosure
Attachment 1
November 28, 2005
Mr. Bruce Anderson
Director, Parks and Recreation
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Per our November 14, 2005 meeting, I am required to develop an official Wetland
Restoration Order, (pursuant to MN Rules 8410.0290, Subp. 3), as a result of non -
permitted wetland impacts caused by actions of the City. Drainage from Afton Heights
Park has eroded gullies up- stream of a wetland owned by Ramsey County (see location
map). As a result of this gully erosion, sediment has been deposited into the wetland
causing an impact to its inherent function and values. This sedimentation is considered
fill under the MN Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and must be removed and/or the
damaged wetland functions and values replaced. i.e., (wetland replacement) at the
direction of the Ramsey Conservation District.
The following information supplements the attached Wetland Restoration Order.
Findings of Fact:
• Wetland fill (sediment) is observed within a wetland protected under the
jurisdiction of WCA.
• The wetland in question is owned by Ramsey County.
• Wetland fill is the result of un- managed surface water runoff from Afton Heights
Park, which is directly to the east of the wetland. The runoff has eroded two
severe gullies, which are the source of the sediment impact to the wetland in
question.
• You indicated that the runoff management issue /gully erosion is the result of
recent grading/park landscaping activities completed by the City.
M
• You indicated that the City has contracted with an engineering firm to address,
i.e., develop construction plans, the Park's drainage /gully issue and that as part of
this restorative activity, the City would restore the impacted wetland per WCA
requirements.
As is required by WCA, I have assessed the impact, in consultation with Ramsey -
Washington Metro Watershed District (R -WMWD) staff and Ramsey County
Park's staff and we have determined that some of the impact to the wetland can-
not be restored and therefore will require functions and values replacement.
Specifically, on November 7, 2005, R -WMWD staff and I observed turbid water
within the open water portion of the wetland, which is indicative of fine clay and
silt soil particles being transported into the wetland. We have determined that
physical removal of this fill impact will do more damage to the wetland than
leaving it in place. We therefore shall require replacement of the lost functions
and values.
You shall accomplish wetland restoration /functions and values replacement by the
following:
a) All wetland fill along the wetland's east and northeast edges (see approximate location
on map) shall be removed to the satisfaction of myself and/or R -WMWD staff. It is
anticipated that removal will be accomplished when the natural soil "a- horizon" is
exposed. Removed sediment shall be disposed of in a manner acceptable to the City and
County.
b) In an attempt to replace the non - restorable impacted wetland functions and values, the
wetland's open water area shall be expanded by excavating the Reed Canary Grass area
of the wetland's north end (see map). Excavation depth shall not exceed three feet with
very shallow side slopes per direction of RCD and R -WMWD staff. Removed wetland
soils shall be disposed of in a manner acceptable to the City and County.
c) If physically possible, sediment removal and wetland excavation shall be accomplished
by January 15, 2006.
d) In the spring of 2006, the excavated and sediment removal areas of the wetland shall
be planted with wetland plats acceptable to the County and R -WMWD.
e) In an attempt to replace non - restorable functions and values, the city shall attempt to
remove eradicate Reed Canary Grass from the wetland's east and north ends (see map)
and replaced with County and R -WMWD approved native wetland vegetation.
f) As stated in the Order, this Order and its supplement is binding unless, within thirty
(30) days of the date this Order was mailed to you, you contact the R -WMWD and
acquire a certificate of exemption from the WCA.
If you have any questions, please call me at the District office (651- 266- 7272).
11
Any information provided either verbally or in writing by the Ramsey Conservation
District does not abrogate following the MN Wetland Conservation Act to the letter
of the law.
Sincerely,
Tom P. Petersen
District Manager
61
H
Preliminary Master Plan
Rcm ,
P..pa ,Ty Lw, 1 7P Fr
sc
00' Yu y P
q
N,dmcm Fcncjng
vq
50
8 Tu 10' Nfmmtcr it
wid, L"',7 1,
259' Y.,,ffi OflI t I Em
Trail
Nei Neighborhood Park
Tu Area Enlargement
T Is Scat I' - W
0
3
CD
cqccn p For
®k_-
O"t
ng','OAt
edg e of
I u va"Cl
(2 fi,ids (4j I ffx 3007)
Men I Me
Arel-
-q
0-
0
3
CD