HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005 11-14 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
00 P.M. Monday, November 14, 2005
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 05 -24
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Acknowledgement of Maplewood Residents Serving the Country
David Bartol- Temporary Appointment
Vote
Swear In
C. ROLL CALL
Mayor's Address on Protocol:
"Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council. It is our desire to keep all discussions civil
as we work through difficult issues tonight. If you are here for a Public Hearing or to address the City
Council, please familiarize yourself with the Policies and Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are
located near the entrance. When you address the council, please state your name and address clearly
for the record. All comments /questions shall be posed to the Mayor and Council. I then will direct
staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments."
11�e1 > >:16IT /e111010MII.litl i
Minutes from the City Council Meeting- October 24, 2005
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
1�81•1, III l i ,1•7-11
All matters listed underthe Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Annual Gambling Resolution — North Tartan Area Girls Basketball at Broadway Bar &
Pizza
3. Consider Approval of 2006 SCORE Funding Application
4. Final Plat — Woodhill (Dahl Avenue, south of Linwood Avenue)
5. Home Occupation License Review — David Grupa Photography (1994 Duluth Street)
6. Conditional Use Permit Review — Oversized Accessory Building (1236 Kohlman Avenue
East)
7. Conditional Use Permit Review — Ponds of Battle Creek Golf Course (601 Century
Avenue South)
8. Conditional Use Permit Review — Woodlynn Ponds Townhomes (Chisholm Court, south
of County Road D)
9. Senior Administrative Assistant
10. Cafeteria Plan Master Plan Revisions
11. Welfare Plan & Integral Part Trust Revisions
12. Budget Transfer from Contingency Account to Fire Account for New Heating and AC
Unit
13. Adjust City Publishing Budget
14. 2006 Employee Insurance Renewal
15. Healthcare Savings Plan Document (HRA)
17 411111[am71 *e1N1.[41
7:00 p.m. Edgerton Manor Building Addition Setback Variance (2021 Edgerton Street)
AWARD OF BIDS
Applewood Park Change Orders
111.1 a1.16y:1 :Ili lyl.l * &`
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Canvass of Election Results
2. Calling for a Special Election
3. Consideration of Ballot Question - Intoxicating Liquor License Increase
4. Liquor License On -Sale Change of Manager - The Olive Garden - Gjon Prendi
5. Liquor License On -Sale Change of Manager — Noodles & Company — Matthew Hinrichs
6. Liquor Off -Sale Change of Manager — A -1 Liquor — Guneet Arneja
7. Dahl Avenue Improvements — City Project 05 -10 — Resolution Considering Dismissal of
Assessment Objection Related to Property Ownership
8. Valley View Avenue Drainage Concerns — City Project 05 -36 — Consider Authorizing
Storm Water Ponding Investigation and Authorize Project Funding
9. Kennard Street Improvements (Beam to County Road D) - Project 03 -04 - Resolution for
Modification of Existing Landscape Contract, Change Order No. 2
10. Special Assessment Agreement and Release of Master Development Agreement:
Ramsey County Library (Southlawn Drive - Legacy Village)
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
Council Meeting Date for Second Meeting in December
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon
request. The request for this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City
Clerk's Office at (651) 249 -2001 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available.
Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the Cityof Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council
Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's
opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when
appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for
each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language.
DRAFT -- MINUTES Agenda Item D1
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, October 24, 2005
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 05 -23
9
A
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
0
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present
Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes from the October 10, 2005 City Council Meeting
Councilmember Koppen moved to
Council Meeting as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach
Ayes-All
2. Minutes from the October 17, 2005 Special City Council Meeting
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the minutes from the October 17, 2005
Special City Council Meeting.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
C
F.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the agenda as amended.
M1. Mayor's Forum
M2. South Leg Meeting
M3. Paramedic Service
M4. Paid Per Call Firefighter
M5. Ramsey County League of Local Government
N1. Council Appointment
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
1. Proclamation — World Town Planning Day
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
the minutes from the October 10. 2005
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05
b. City Manager Fursman read the proclamation announcing November 8 as World
Planning Day.
2. D and D Towing Gift to Police Department
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Dean Mathisen, 2096 McKnight Road, North St. Paul,
Mr. Mathisen presented the Police Department with a donation in honor of his father who
passed away on October 8, 2005.
G. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve consent agenda items 1 -11.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
1. Approval of Claims
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 7,904.03 Checks # 68153 thru # 68154
dated 10/05/05
$ 673,909.31 Checks #68155 thru # 68218
dated 10/11/05
$ 759,634.25 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 9/30/05 thru 10/06/05
$ 380.25 Checks # 68219
dated 10/13/05
$ 340,438.57 Checks # 68220 thru # 68271
dated 10/18/05
$ 284,210.83 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 10/07/05 thru 10/13/05
$ 2,066,477.24 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 10 -07-
$ 461,592.86 05
$ 2,406.75 Payroll Deduction check # 102805 thru # 102807
dated 10 -07 -05
2
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05
$ 463,999.61 Total Payroll
$ 2,530,476.85 GRAND TOTAL
2. Conditional Use Permit Review — Sibley Cove Apartments (1996 County Road D)
Moved to review the conditional use permit (CUP) for the Sibley Cove Apartments at
1996 County Road D again in June, 2006, or sooner if the owner proposes a major
change to the site.
3. Conditional Use Permit Review — Hmong Alliance Church (1770 McMenemy Street)
Moved to approve the conditional use permit for the St. Paul Hmong Alliance Church at
1770 McMenemy Street again in one year.
4. Increase in Records, Elections and License Department Service Charges
Approved the following revisions in the Records, Elections, and License Service
Charges:
RECORDS, ELECTIONS, AND LICENSES
Service Charges
Estimated
Annual
2004
2005
2006
Volume
Fee
Fee
Fee
Adult Use & Sexually-Oriented Business
0
$508
$515
$525
Alarm Installation Permit
20
49
50
51
Alarm System License
165
49
50
51
Amusement Park License
1
341
345
352
Auctioneer License
1
94
95
97
Bench Permit
1st Bench
1
61
62
63
Additional Benches
18
37
37
38
Business Registration License
125
0
35
36
Carnival License
3
335
339
346
Cat License - fee for two years '
100
18
19
19
Catering Food Vehicle License
1st Vehicle
2
114
115
117
Each Additional Vehicle
1
77
78
80
Fleet
1
305
309
315
3
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05
Christmas Tree Sales License
8
202
205
209
Cigarette and Tobacco License
65
86
87
89
Coin Op. Amusement Device
Base Fee
38
200
203
207
Per Device
447
50
51
52
Contractors License
600
114
115
117
Currency Exchange License
1
313
317
323
Dog Kennels - New License
1
74
75
77
Dog Kennels - Renewal License
2
39
40
41
Dog License - Fee for two years '
700
18
19
19
Food Establishment License
126
590
598
610
Golf Course License
4
289
293
299
Home Occupations - Renewal
5
55
56
57
Itinerant Food Establishment License
12
67
68
69
Liquor License - Investigation Fee:
Investigations in state 2
Investigations out of state
8
0
500
902
500
914
500
932
Liquor License - Temporary On -Sale - Per Day
179
181
185
Motels: 1 - 15 Units
16 - 35 Units
36 - 100 Units
Over 100 Units
1
2
1
2
109
148
272
313
110
150
276
317
112
153
282
323
Motor Vehicle Repair License
49
141
143
146
Nonperishable Food Vehicle License
1st Vehicle
Each Additional Vehicle
Fleet
2
1
1
67
40
155
68
41
157
69
42
160
Pawn Shop
1
9,140
9,260
9,260
Pending Assessment Search
170
42
43
44
Personal Service Business Premise
License -New
1
635
643
656
Personal Service Business Premise
License - Renewal
3
226
229
234
Personal Service Worker -
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05
Investigation Fee
1
118
120
122
Personal Service Worker - License
13
195
198
202
Potentially Haz. Food Vehicle Licensing
1st Vehicle
3
160
162
165
Each Additional Vehicle
Fleet
1
1
77
456
78
462
80
471
Second Hand Dealer License
4
321
325
332
Service Station License
1st Pump
Each Additional Pump
17
101
161
14
163
14
166
14
Sewer Connection Permit
145
83
84
86
Solicitor License
Base Charge
Each Solicitor
2
2
151
52
153
53
156
54
Special Food Handling Establishment
35
90
91
93
Swimming Pool License - Commercial
Indoor
Outdoor
Combined
10
22
2
104
104
141
105
105
143
107
107
146
Tavern License
1
51
52
53
Taxicab License
Base Charge
Each Driver
1
1
71
53
24
72
54
24
73
55
24
Temporary Food and Beer License
31
47
48
49
Temporary Gambling Permit - Per Day 3
50
51
52
Theater License - Indoor
14
204
207
211
Theater License - Outdoor
0
500
507
517
Trailer Rental License
1st Five Trailers
Each Additional License
3
40
13
41
13
42
13
Used Car Dealer License
11
292
296
302
5. 2005 Budget Adjustments for Debt Service and Capital Project Funds
Approved the 2005 Budget Adjustments for Debt Service and Capital Project Funds.
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05
6. Traffic Control Signal Agreement 88640M for TH 61 at Arcade Street and
Roselawn Avenue — Park Entrance
Adopted the following resolution approving Traffic Control Signal Agreement No.
88640M between the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the City of
Maplewood:
RESOLUTION 05 -10 -156
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter into an agreement with the State of
Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit:
For maintenance and operation of the existing traffic control signal with Street Lights,
Interconnect and Signing on Trunk Highway 61 at Arcade Street /Roselawn Avenue -Park
Entrance in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement
No. 88640M, a copy of which was before the Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized
to execute such agreement and any amendments, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all
of the contractual obligations contained therein.
MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL
AGREEMENT NO. 88640M
BETWEEN
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
FOR
Maintenance and Operation of the existing Traffic Control Signal with Street lights, Interconnect and
Signing on Trunk Highway 61 at Arcade Street /Roselawn Avenue -Park Entrance, in Maplewood,
Ramsey County, Minnesota.
C.S. 6222
Prepared by Metropolitan District Traffic Engineering
ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE
None
PARTIES
AMOUNT ENCUMBERED
None
Otherwise Covered
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by the Minnesota Department of Transportation,
(State), and the City of Maplewood, (City).
RECITALS
Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to enter into
agreements with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and
improving the Trunk Highway system.
The Ramsey County Public Works Department has turned back the road formerly known as
County State Aid Highway No. 60 (Arcade Street) /Roselawn Avenue -Park Entrance to the City. This
road is currently known as Arcade Street/Roselawn Avenue -Park Entrance.
The parties desire to provide the maintenance and operation for the existing traffic control
signal, including street lights, interconnect and signing (Traffic Control Signal), on Trunk Highway 61 at
Arcade Street/ Roselawn Avenue -Park Entrance.
Due to Ramsey County no longer having jurisdiction over any legs of this intersection, Ramsey
County will no longer perform the minor maintenance or pay for the monthly electrical power for the
existing Traffic Control Signal, at the location provided for above.
The City and the State will participate in the maintenance and operation of the existing Traffic
Control Signal.
CONTRACT
1. The responsibility for the existing Traffic Control Signal is as follows: a) the City will, at
its cost and expense: (1) relamp the existing traffic control signal; (2) clean and paint the existing
traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions; (3) maintain the luminaires and all
their components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary; and (4) relamp the street
lights; and b) The State will, at its cost and expense, maintain the signing and interconnect and
perform all other existing traffic control signal and street light maintenance.
2. The City will, at its cost and expense, pay all monthly electrical service expenses
necessary to operate the existing Traffic Control Signal.
3. Each party will be solely responsible for its own acts and omissions, and the results
thereof, to the extent authorized by law. The State's liability is governed by the Minnesota Tort
Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736. The City's liability is governed by Minnesota
Statutes Chapter 466 and other applicable law. Each party will be solely responsible for its own
employees for any Workers Compensation Claims.
4. All timing of the existing Traffic Control Signal will be determined by the State, and no
changes may be made except with the approval of the State.
5. Upon execution and approval by the City and the State, this agreement will supersede
and terminate the maintenance and operation terms in Agreement No. 77076, Dated July 14, 1998,
regarding the intersection of Trunk Highway 61 at County State Aid Highway No. 60 ( Arcade
Street)/ Roselawn Avenue Park Entrance, between Ramsey County, Maplewood, and the State.
6. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has
been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original
Agreement, or their successors in office.
7. If any party fails to enforce any provisions of this Agreement, that failure does not waive
the provision or its right to enforce it.
8. This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the parties. No other
understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party.
9. Minnesota law governs this contract. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this
Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in
Ramsey County, Minnesota.
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05
10. This Agreement is effective on the date the State obtains all required signatures under
Minnesota Statutes 16C.05, Subdivision 2, and will remain in effect until terminated by written
agreement of the parties.
Currency Exchange License Renewal — Cashway Checking — 3035 White Bear
Avenue
Approved the annual renewal license for Cashway Checking.
Temporary Gambling Resolution — Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Adopted the following resolution approving the temporary gambling resolution for the
Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, 1725 Kennard Street, Maplewood, MN:
RESOLUTION 05 -10 -157
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the temporary
premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed
Virgin Mary (BVM), 1725 Kennard Street, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of
application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division
of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with
Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of
Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
IT Budget Transfer
Approved the Finance Director to make the appropriate budget adjustments for 2005 by
moving $45,000 from the IT Fund Reserves.
10. Legacy Village Release of Obligation
Adopted the following Release of Obligations Under Master Development Agreement:
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RELEASE OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER
MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
KENNARD PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, LLC
I. Recital.
1.1 The Effective Date of this Agreement is , 2005.
1.2 The Parties to this Agreement are City of Maplewood, Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city
( "City "), Legacy Holdings -MW LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ( "Master Developer ") and Kennard
Professional Building, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ( "Successor Developer ").
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05
1.3 City and Master Developer are parties to a Master Development Agreement with an effective
date of September 8, 2003, recorded November 21, 2003 as Document No. 3704070 in the Office of the
Ramsey County Recorder and recorded November 21, 2003 as Document No. 1791278 in the Office of the
Ramsey County Registrar of Titles, as amended by First Amendment to Development Agreement with an
effective date of February 9, 2004 and as amended by a Second Amendment to Development Agreement
with an effective date of April 26, 2005 ( "Master Development Agreement ").
1.4 Various real estate parcels are subject to the Master Development Agreement and
Successor Developer has entered into an Agreement with Master Developer to purchase one of the parcels
subject to the Master Development Agreement for the purpose of developing a corporate /commercial
facility (the "Kennard Development "). Such parcel is referred to as the western part of "Phase 7 — Outlot G"
in the Master Development Agreement but is now legally described as:
That part of Lot 2, Block 2, LEGACY VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD, according to the recorded plat
thereof, lying westerly of a line described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence South 89 degrees 46 minutes 12
seconds West, along north line of said Lot 2, a distance of 594.65 feetto the beginning of the line to
be described; thence South 0 degrees 14 minutes 51 seconds East a distance of 357.70 feetto the
south line of said Lot 2, and said line there terminating.
1.5 In connection with the acquisition of the Subject Parcel, Successor Developer has requested
that the Subject Parcel and the Successor Developer be released from the terms and conditions of the
Master Developer Agreement pursuant to Section 9.2(c) of the Master Development Agreement and Master
Developer has requested to be released from the terms and conditions of the Master Development
Agreement as to the Subject Parcel pursuant to Section 9.3 of the Master Development Agreement.
1.6 City has approved the Subject Parcel for use consistent with the proposed Kennard
Development, on that basis, City is willing to release both the Successor Developer and Master Developer
from the terms and conditions of the Master Development Agreement subject to Master Developer's
acknowledgement of its obligations under Section 6.2 of the Master Development Agreementto pay a part
of the special assessments attributable to the Subject Parcel as set forth on Exhibit F to the Master
Development Agreement and its continuing obligations as to other parcels that remain subjectto the Master
Development Agreement.
1.7
THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
II. Agreement.
2.1 Because City has approved the Kennard Development as set forth above, City agrees that:
(a) The Subject Parcel is released from the Master Development Agreement and
therefore the Master Development Agreement no longer encumbers the Subject Parcel.
(b) Successor Developer has no liability or obligations under the Master Development
Agreement; provided however, this Agreement does not release the Successor Developer from its
obligations to timely pay City fees and charges due in the ordinary course of development and
building construction.
2.2 Successor Developer will commence and complete the Kennard Development as approved
by the City.
2.3 From and after the effective date set forth above, Master Developer is released from its
obligations under the Master Development Agreement as to the Subject Parcel subject to the following:
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05
(a) Master Developer will comply with the terms of Section 6.2 of the Master
Development Agreement in connection with the payment of special assessments attributable to the
Subject Parcel; and
(b) Master Developer remains liable under the Master Development Agreement as to all
other parcels subject to the Master Development Agreement that are not released hereby or
previously released.
This document drafted by:
Briggs and Morgan, P.A. (DJC)
W2200 First National Bank Bldg.
332 Minnesota Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
11. Legacy Village Assessments
Adopted the following Special Assessment Escrow Agreement:
See attachment A
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7:00 p.m. Dahl Avenue, Street and Utility Improvements for Woodhill Development, City
Project 05 -10:
a. Assessment Hearing
b. Approve Resolution for Adoption of Assessment Roll
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. City Engineer AN presented specifics from the report.
C. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
William Kayser, 6408 81 "Avenue North, Brooklyn Park
d. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution adopting the assessment roll
for the Dahl Avenue Street and Utility Improvements for Woodhill Development:
RESOLUTION 05 -10 -158
ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on October 24` 2005, calling
for a Public Hearing, the assessment roll for the Dahl Avenue, Street and Utility Improvements for
Woodhill Development, City Project 05 -10, was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, no property owners have filed objections to their assessments according to the
requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows:
No property owners have filed objections as of October 17, 2005.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05 10
1. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to review the objections received
and report to the City Council at the regular meeting on November 14` 2005, as to their
recommendations for adjustments.
2. The assessment roll for the Dahl Avenue Street and Utility Improvements for Woodhill
Development as amended, without those property owners' assessments that have filed
objections, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted. Said
assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and
each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement
in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
3. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15
years, the first installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2006 and
shall bear interest at the rate of 6.1 percent per annum for the date of the adoption of this
assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment
from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when
due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment
to the county auditor, but no later than November 23 2005, pay the whole of the assessment
on such property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the city clerk, except that
no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of
this resolution; and they may, at any time after November 23 2005, pay to the county auditor
the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of
the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or
interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year.
5. The city engineer and city clerk shall transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county no later than November
24` 2005. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
RESOLUTION 05 -10 -159
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter into an agreement with the State of
Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit:
For maintenance and operation of the existing traffic control signal with Street
Lights, Interconnect and Signing on Trunk Highway 61 at Arcade Street/Roselawn Avenue-
Park Entrance in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in
Agreement No. 88640M, a copy of which was before the Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby
are authorized to execute such agreement and any amendments, and thereby assume for and
on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes -All
AWARD OF BIDS
None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Second Reading Special Election Ordinance
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05 11
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
City Clerk Guilfoile presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following second reading of the Special Election
Ordinance No. 866:
ORDINANCE 866
Filling a Council Vacancy
A. The council shall appoint an eligible person to fill a vacancy on the city council as soon as is
practicable after the vacancy occurs. The person appointed shall serve for the unexpired
portion of the term unless a special election is required hereunder or by state law.
B. Special Election — In the event a vacancy is declared pursuant to state law, the city council shall
by resolution declare such a vacancy to exist. If the unexpired term is for a period of six months
or less, the council shall appoint an eligible person to serve for the remainder of the unexpired
term. In the event the unexpired term is greater than six months, the council shall hold a special
election to fill the unexpired term.
The special election shall be held as soon as the vacancy is declared as is practical under state
law, no special primary election shall occur in cases of special elections held pursuant to this
section.
The ordinance will be published on November 2n in the official newspaper and will then be in effect.
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Ramsey County Public Library (3025 Southlawn Drive)
a. Land Use Plan Change (BC (business commercial) to L (Library)) (3 votes)
b. Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Revision
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented specifics of the report.
C. City Attorney Kelly informed the council that the land use plan change requires a super
majority vote. With the one vacant council seat, that would mean 3 votes are needed for
approval.
d. Commissioner Fischer representing the Planning Commission Report.
e. The following persons were heard:
Susan Niemitz, Director Ramsey County Library
Tim Karle, HDA Architects
Jason Thomas, representing the Hartford Group
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the resolution approving a comprehensive land use
plan amendment from BC (business commercial) to L (library) for the proposed Ramsey County
Library to locate within Legacy Village along Southlawn Drive. Approval is based on the following
reasons:
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION 05 -10 -160
WHEREAS, the Hartford Group applied for a change to the City's land use plan from BC
(business commercial) to L (library) for the construction of a library for Ramsey County.
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05 12
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located at the southwest corner of Legacy
Parkway and Southlawn Drive. The legal description is:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Legacy Village of Maplewood
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
On October 3, 2005, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff
published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the
city council approve the land use plan change.
On October 24, 2005, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They
considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approved the above described
change for the following reasons:
Libraries are desired and beneficial facilities in both residential and commercial areas.
The proposed library would not negatively affect the approved tax - abatement financing
plan for Legacy Village.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following resolution approving a PUD (planned
unit development) revision for Legacy Village to allow the proposed Ramsey County Library on
Southlawn Drive south of Legacy Parkway. Approval is based on the findings required by
ordinance and subject to the following conditions (additions are underlined and deletions are
crossed out):
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION 05 -10 -161
WHEREAS, the Hartford Group applied for a conditional use permit revision to amend the PUD
(planned unit development) for Legacy Village for the construction of a proposed Ramsey County
library.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at the southwest corner of Legacy Parkway and
Southlawn Drive. The legal description is:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Legacy Village of Maplewood
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
On October 3, 2005, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this permit. The planning commission held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written
statements. The planning commission considered the recommendations of city staff and the
public.
2. The city council reviewed this request on October 24, 2005 and considered the
recommendations of the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approved the above - described
conditional use permit because:
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05 13
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed
out):
1. Compliance with the following PUD revisions:
6) Library Sernmersial Site (Outlot D):
a. This T he ^^n^•^'^' site is planned in concept only within the PUD and will
come in for design review and approval at a later date, but the use is
allowed as long as the provisions of the BC zoning district and conditions
outlined here are met;
b. The library ^^^ of t he ``UildiRg^ An t he GArnmerGial site should be sited
close to the corner of Southlawn Drive and Legacy Parkway, within 30' of
the C^, t h l awn ^•'� ' -P. right -of -way or as close as practicable
c. Allowed signage should only be wall signage or ground- mounted
monument signs no more than 12' in height;
d. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in
keeping with the nearby senior assisted living building, townhomes and
other buildings if present;
e. Access to the site will be off Legacy Parkway and onto Southlawn if
approved by the city engineer;
j_ All ground- mounted and roof - mounted mechanical equipment will be
completely screened from eye -level view of adjacent streets and adjacent
properties, including the park and trail around the ponding area to the west;
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05 14
h. There must be sidewalks connecting entries to a b ildiRg° ^^ °'+^ *^
Legacy Parkway, Southlawn Drive and the path around the pond to the
west. an d 4^ „4 ^4 E . E. SuGh siQev.�P;.ks must be separat th pa rki Rg
'At at Gurh'Pvel ^^' ^^•k'^^ let level; The developer must enter into a
development agreement with the city to dedicate a trail along the south side
of the property to connect the existing park trail to a future sidewalk along
Southlawn Drive. The developer must construct these trails and sidewalks,
and any others deemed necessary by the city engineer.
Uses on the site are encouraged to take advantage of the park and trail
system around the ponding area to the west by providing outdoor seating,
plazas, overlooks or similar features;
L Overstory trees must be planted along the north side of Legacy Parkway
and the west side of Southlawn Drive an average of 30' -40' on center.
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05 15
2. The developer shall comply with the requirements of the city's wetland - protection ordinance.
3. All construction shall follow the site plan (review pending) approved by the city. The director
of community development may approve minor changes.
4. The proposed construction shall be substantially started within one year of council approval
or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
5. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
6. If the proposed library has any impact on the terms of the development agreement for
Legacy Village, the applicant or county shall pay for any costs associated with the library
proposal.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
No Parking Zones — Twin Cities Hmong Alliance Church (1234 County Road B (at
Atlantic Street))
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
Assistant City Manager Coleman presented specifics from the report.
Dr. Steven Mouacheupao, 2717 Longview Drive, North St. Paul
Police Chief Lukin expressed his fire safety concerns.
Mayor Cardinal moved to table the item until the November 28` City Council Meeting until the
Church Pastor returns from out of the country.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Koppen and Rossbach
Nay - Councilmember Juenemann
The following persons were heard:
Gerry Markie, 1247 Leland Road, Maplewood
Rebecca Groveland, Duluth Street, Maplewood
AN Her— no address stated
David Bartol, 1249 Frisbee, Maplewood
Cher Chou Mor, Assistant Pastor of Hmong Alliance Church
Metro Transit Park and Ride Facility — City Project 05 -32 — Resolution Requesting Traffic
Study at County Road B /Rice Street and Improvements to Rice Street/TH 36 Bridge
City Manager Fursman presented the report
City Engineer AN presented the specifics of the report
Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following resolution requesting a traffic study by
Metro Transit at the Rice Street /County Road B intersection prior to site approvals for the park
and Ride Facility at this intersection and a petition to our local legislative leaders to expedite
the improvements to the Rice Street Bridge over TH 36:
RESOLUTION 05 -10 -162
REQUESTING TRAFFIC STUDY AND INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY ROAD B /RICE STREET /TH 36
WHEREAS, traffic flow at the intersection of County Road B and Rice Street is impeded by
the configuration of the Rice Street Bridge over Highway 36 and the number of intersections
in close proximity to the bridge, and
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05 16
WHEREAS, business in this area including St. Jude Medical, Inc., Joe's Sporting Goods, and
Cub Foods generate substantial traffic flows on County Road B, and
WHEREAS, most traffic utilizing the aforementioned businesses are impacted by the impediments at
Rice and County Road B, and
WHEREAS, Metro Transit is contemplating the creation of a park and ride lot on the
Northeast corner of the intersection of County Road B and Rice Street, and
WHEREAS, the park and ride lot will accommodate over 400 vehicles in addition to the bus
traffic that will serve this site, and
WHEREAS, the vast majority of these vehicles will further exacerbate the existing problems at the
County Road B and Rice Street intersection, and
WHEREAS, it is believed that further conflicts at the County Road B and Rice Street intersection will
have negative impacts on existing businesses in this area, and
WHEREAS, the business community in this area is valuable to Maplewood, Ramsey County, and the
State of Minnesota due to its creation of quality jobs and the importance of the products it produces,
and
WHEREAS, future expansion of these businesses will be jeopardized if employees and customers are
negatively impacted by poor traffic flow at the intersection of County Road B and Rice Street,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood that:
Metro Transit conduct a traffic study on the intersection of County Road B and Rice Street that
documents existing traffic impediments, measures the impact of the proposed park and ride lot,
and factors in any growth of existing business whose
traffic flow utilizes this intersection prior to any consideration of the project by the
Maplewood City Council or the award of any contracts by Metro Transit.
2. The Maplewood City Council, Metro Transit, the area businesses, our local senators and
representatives and Ramsey County hereby petition the Minnesota Department of
Transportation and Governor Pawlenty for funding to reconstruct the Rice Street
Bridge over Highway 36 as soon as possible to resolve the existing traffic problems at
the intersection of County Road B and Rice Street to enable the construction of a new park and
ride lot to serve the area's transit needs as well as making it feasible for existing properties and
businesses to continue expanding in Maplewood and Little Canada.
Seconded by Council member Juenemann Ayes -All
Public Works Building Expansion — City Project 03 -19 — Approve Proposal
Request AS No. 8 and Authorize Budget Transfer
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
City Engineer AN presented the specifics of the report
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Proposal Request No. 8 from Jorgenson
Construction, Inc. for the Public Works Building Expansion in the amount of $8,857 and authorized
the Finance Director to transfer the same amount from the Fleet Management Fund to the Public
Works Building Expansion Fund.
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05 17
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann
Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Juenemann and Koppen
Nay - Councilmember Rossbach
Staff Changes for Building Inspections —Approve Addition of Two Positions
(Apprentice Building Inspector and Civil Engineer 1) and Authorize Budget
Revisions for 2005/2006
City Manager Fursman presented the report.
David Fischer presented specifics from the report
Assistant City Engineer AN and Assistant City Manager Coleman answered questions from
council.
Councilmember Juenemann moved the following staff recommendation to approve the addition
of two staff position additions:
A. Approve the addition of a full -time apprentice building inspector position as a two -year
position as of November 14, 2005. The city will review the need for this position based on the
volume of work (quantity of inspections) and the supporting revenue at the end of 2006 and
2007 and after each apprentice building inspector leaves the city.
B. Approve the addition of a second full -time Civil Engineer I position as a two -year position
as of November 14, 2005. This position will be budgeted 75% to the engineering division
(general fund) and 25% to the environmental utility fund. The position will be reviewed with
building inspection and engineering revenue numbers at the end of 2006 and again at the end
of 2007 to insure a positive budget impact occurs.
C. Approve the following budget changes for these positions:
1. Transfer $6,830 from the 2005 General Fund Contingency Reserve into the
Building Inspections program budget to cover the cost of this position for the remainder of
2005.
2. Add $55,360 to the Building Inspections program budget for 2006. ($51,880 is
needed for the position and $3,480 to maintain an additional vehicle).
3. Add $8,730 to the Engineering program budget for 2006, by adding $39,448 to
Engineering Expenditures and $30,718 to Engineering Revenue.
4. Add $18,030 in Employee Services to the Storm Sewer program (Environmental
Utility) budget for 2006.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes-All
Strategic Team Development
City Manager Fursman presented the report and specifics of the report.
Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the transfer of $6,900 from the contingency fund
to the executive department for the purposed strategic development function.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes—All
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05 18
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Mayor's Forum -A Mayor's Forum will not be held in November.
South Leg Meeting -The next meeting will be held on November 10` at Fire Station #4
with the topic being Development in Maplewood.
Paramedic Service- Deputy Police Chief Banick clarified that all newly hired police offices
are required to attend paramedic training as a condition of their employment.
Paid per Call Firefighters -Fire Chief Lukin stated the paid per call fire fighters are city
employees, the Fire Fighters Relief Association are not.
Ramsey County League of Local Government -The next meeting is Thursday, October
27` with the topic being Communication between School Districts and Cities. The
meeting will start at 7:00 p.m. will be held at the White Bear School District Service
Center.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
Council Appointment -The council completed the interview process and have narrowed
down the candidates from 9 to 1. David Bartol was voted as the number one candidate
after Mayor Cardinal broke a three way tie of the applicants. The temporary
appointment will be officially appointed on November 14` 2005.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Juenemann moved to adjourn at 9:40 p.m.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
City Council Meeting 10 -24 -05 19
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Council
FROM:
Finance Director
RE:
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE:
November 14, 2005
AGENDA NO. G -1
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTSPAYABLE
S
30,211.36
Checks # 68272 thru # 68274
dated 10/19/05 thru 10 /20/05
S
138,163.48
Checks # 68275 thru # 68327
dated 10 /25/05
S
120,754.99
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 10/14/05 thru 10/21/05
S
116,720.00
Checks # 68328 thru # 68329
dated 10/24/05 thru 10/27/05
S
1,137,207.77
Checks # 68330 thru #68387
dated 11101105
S
305,477.38
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 10/21/05 thru 10/27/05
S
59.35
EFT # 68388 thru # 68389
dated 11/08/05
S
501,431.23
Checks # 68390 thru # 68444
dated 11/04/05 thru 11/08/05
S
123,680.44
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 11/28 /05 thru 11/03/05
S
2,473,706.00
Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
S
554,101.37
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 10 /21/05
S
2,406.75
Payroll Deduction check # 102987 thm # 102989
dated 10/21/05
S
450,954.73
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 11/04/05
S
2,406.75
Payroll Deduction check # 103109 thm # 1031 It
dated 11/04/05
S
1,009,869.60
Total Payroll
S 3,483,575.60 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651-249-2902 if you have any
questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file
attachments
P'. \EXCELWPRCLM51200S05 AprClms 10 21 , 10 28 and 11 -04
vchlist Check Register Page: 1
10/21/2005 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
68272
10/19/2005
03462
NELSON DODGE -GMC
2006 GMC YUKON 1500
28,811.36
68273
10/20/2005
03240
BARTZ, PAUL
POLICE OFFICER FOR MCC 10/20
120.00
68274
10/20/2005
03521
G ALEXANDER KOLAND
ARTIST FOR MCC SHOW 10/20
1,280.00
68275
10/25/2005
00111
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC
PATROL & BOARDING FEES 9/24-
947.70
68276
10/25/2005
01811
BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC
MERCH FOR RESALE
117.60
68277
10/25/2005
00096
BP/AMOCO OIL COMPANY
FUEL
268.84
68278
10/25/2005
03486
BUBERL BLACK DIRT INC
BLACK DIRT
15.98
68279
10/25/2005
03508
COLBURN CARPENTRY INC
REF GRADING ESC - 2446 KING
500.00
68280
10/25/2005
03281
CORBETT, CAITLIN
HAZELWOOD PARK LIGHT
640.00
68281
10/25/2005
03522
CYLKOWSKI, GREG
YOUTH SOCCER REFEREE
75.00
68282
10/25/2005
03523
CYLKOWSKI, LANCE
YOUTH SOCCER REFEREE
50.00
68283
10/25/2005
00363
DLT SOLUTIONS, INC.
AUTODESK CONTRACT RENEWAL
4,496.00
68284
10/25/2005
02743
DOBLAR, RICHARD
REIMB FOR MEAL 10 -3
8.00
68285
10/25/2005
01973
ERICKSON OIL PRODUCTS INC
CAR WASHES - SEP
64.00
68286
10/25/2005
00003
ESCROW REFUND
REF KIRSTIN JACOBSON -
500.00
68287
10/25/2005
00003
ESCROW REFUND
REF SHARON SANDEEN -
200.00
68288
10/25/2005
03365
FRANZEN, NICK
REIMB INTERNET & MILEAGE 6/24-
188.78
68289
10/25/2005
01852
GUARANTEED CLEAN MAINTENANCE
FLOOR STRIPPING & CARPET
289.68
68290
10/25/2005
00652
HEINZ, STEVE
REIMB MEALS & LODGING 10/10-
229.67
68291
10/25/2005
03524
HUBIG, STEPHEN
YOUTH SOCCER REFEREE
11.00
68292
10/25/2005
00748
JAGOE, CAROL
REIMB FOR MILEAGE 10/12
14.75
68293
10/25/2005
00788
KARTS, FLINT
REIMB FOR MEALS 10/3 -10/5
23.50
68294
10/25/2005
00857
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
600.00
68295
10/25/2005
02248
LINN, BRYAN
REIMB FOR UNIFORM 8/18
119.96
68296
10/25/2005
03525
LUBKE, DON
YOUTH SOCCER REFEREE
60.00
68297
10/25/2005
02336
M A TAYLOR INC
FITNESS PROGRAM CONSULTANT
1,735.00
68298
10/25/2005
00945
MASYS CORP
STRATUS SOFTWARE MAI NT -
738.68
68299
10/25/2005
00986
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
MONTHLY SAC - SEP
90,436.50
68300
10/25/2005
01035
MN CHAPTER IAAI
TRAINING 12/6 -12/8
250.00
68301
10/25/2005
01126
MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE
PERA LIFE INSURANCE
300.00
68302
10/25/2005
01175
NORTH ST PAUL, CITY OF
ELECTRIC & SEWER
2,658.01
68303
10/25/2005
02300
OAKDALE LOCKSMITHS
EMERGENCY MGMT KEYS
477.12
68304
10/25/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REIMB JEFF JELINEK - DRIVEWAY
1,946.00
68305
10/25/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REIMB JUDY WIDHOLM -
207.09
68306
10/25/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REIMB STEPHEN SHARP -
125.00
68307
10/25/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF JODY CUSHMAN - PRMT# 05-
115.50
68308
10/25/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF MULKI ABDI -AMB 04001254
90.00
68309
10/25/2005
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF MICHELLE NEPHEW -
59.50
68310
10/25/2005
03373
OWENS, THOMAS
REF GRADING ESC - 575 RIPLEY
566.71
68311
10/25/2005
01254
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
MERCH FOR RESALE
364.55
68312
10/25/2005
03151
PETTY CASH
REPLENISH PETTY CASH
131.34
68313
10/25/2005
01269
PIPE SERVICES CORP
SANITARY SEWER INSP
3,997.50
68314
10/25/2005
00396
PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF
TRANSFER TITLE CN 05011362
17.50
68315
10/25/2005
01331
RABBETT, KEVIN
REIMB MEAL FOR CITIZEN PATROL
29.50
68316
10/25/2005
01344
RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS & REC.
DEER PROCESSING FOR FOOD
1,000.00
68317
10/25/2005
01359
REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL XX
CAR WASHES - SEP
59.52
68318
10/25/2005
01360
REINHART FOODSERVICE
MERCH FOR RESALE & PANCAKE
364.44
PANCAKE BREAKFAST
69.01
68319
10/25/2005
01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
RADIO SERV & MAINT - SEP
1,459.90
CRIME LAB SRVS - SEP
580.00
2
vchlist Check Register Page: 2
10/21/2005 10:43:38 AM CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check Date
68320 10/25/2005 02919 TSCHIDA, CHRIS
68321 10/25/2005 01580 TSE, INC.
68322
10/25/2005
01734 WALSH, WILLIAM P.
68323
10/25/2005
01750 WATSON CO INC, THE
68324
10/25/2005
01757 WELCHLIN, CABOT
68325
10/25/2005
02605 WESTBERG, RICK
68326
10/25/2005
03526 WILLIAM SCHOENROCK & SON INC
68327
10/25/2005
01190 XCEL ENERGY
56 Checks in this report
Description /Account Amount
COORDINATE SOCCER REFEREES
1,000.00
GROUNDSKEEPING SRVS 7/10 -
2,810.21
GROUNDSKEEPING SRVS 8/22 -
861.53
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSP
591.68
MERCH FOR RESALE
157.40
REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS
589.16
REF GRADING ESC - 2574
2,528.42
SAND BLASTING PUMP
68.00
ELECTRIC UTILITY
12,358.25
Total checks: 168,374.84
3
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pavee
10/13/05
10/14/05
MN State Treasurer
10/11/05
10/14/05
MN Dept of Revenue
10/14/05
10/17/05
MN State Treasurer
10/14/05
10/17/05
MN Dept of Natural Resources
10/17/05
10/18/05
MN State Treasurer
10/18/05
10/19/05
MN State Treasurer
10/11/05
10/19/05
MN Dept of Revenue
10/14/05
10/19/05
US Bank VISA One Card*
10/19/05
10/20/05
MN State Treasurer
10/14/05
10/20/05
Elan Financial Services*
TOTAL
Description
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
MN Care Tax
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
DNR electronic licenses
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Sales Tax
Purchasing card items
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Purchasing card items
*Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached.
Amount
10, 908.10
4,161.04
9,286.25
548.50
15,132.70
12, 539.13
7,329.00
37,707.90
8,367.46
14,774.91
120,754.99
53
LTA 69_T0TmT-XikTr*00Ti1 US o i1;3DID]FjKll&li[67AEFi ll&l
Posting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
2005/10/03
ORIENTAL TRADING CO
76.40
MANDY ANZALDI
2005/10/03
CUB FOODS, INC.
15.41
MANDY ANZALDI
2005/10/05
VALU THRIFT STORE
32.91
MANDY ANZALDI
2005/10/10
FACTORY CARD OUTLET #284
19.33
MANDY ANZALDI
2005/10/12
ORIENTAL TRADING CO
64.40
MANDY ANZALDI
2005/10/06
PERFORMANCE TRANSM1
1,676.45
JOHN BANICK
2005/10/14
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
76.00
JOHN BANICK
2005/10/14
NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT
98.00
JOHN BANICK
2005/10/03
CRAMER BLDG SERVICES INC
781.11
JIM BEHAN
2005/10/03
DEY DISTRIBUTING, INC.
229.26
JIM BEHAN
2005/10/03
METRO MECHANICAL 01 OF 01
675.00
JIM BEHAN
2005/10/03
METRO MECHANICAL 01 OF 01
697.99
JIM BEHAN
2005/10/05
DAVIS LOCK & SAFE
25.56
JIM BEHAN
2005/10/12
VERIZON WRLS 12KW
45.30
JIM BEHAN
2005/10/06
TWIN CITIES MAGIC & COSTU
12.83
OAKLEY BIESANZ
2005/10/13
KNOWLANS #2
2.99
OAKLEY BIESANZ
2005/10/06
MILLS FLEET FARM #27
13.96
ROGER BREHEIM
2005/10/06
MENARDS 3059
10.18
ROGER BREHEIM
2005/10/13
BEST BUY 00000109
80.39
ROGER BREHEIM
2005/10/14
CUB FOODS, INC.
23.99
ROGER BREHEIM
2005/10/06
ATLAS AUTO PARTS
(50.00)
TROY BRINK
2005/10/06
ATLAS AUTO PARTS
50.00
TROY BRINK
2005/10/14
JERRY'S UPHOLSTERY
200.00
TROY BRINK
2005/10/07
DGI *DYNAMIC GRAPHICS
79.00
HEIDI CAREY
2005/10/12
OFFICE MAX 00002204
33.17
HEIDI CAREY
2005/10/12
FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
138.02
HEIDI CAREY
2005/10/12
NAMEBANK
138.55
HEIDI CAREY
2005/10/04
WMS *WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY
857.14
LINDA CROSSON
2005/10/03
BERGMANN'S GREENHOUSES
36.00
ROBERTA DARST
2005/10/03
COUNTRY SUN FARM & GREENH
11.50
ROBERTA DARST
2005/10/10
VIDEO SERVICES OF AMERICA
100.86
ROBERTA DARST
2005/10/12
SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL
30.00
ROBERTA DARST
2005/10/05
FAMOUS DAVE'S #2006
8.00
RICHARD DOBLAR
2005/10/06
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
97.94
LARRY FARR
2005/10/06
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
229.71
LARRY FARR
2005/10/06
GOLDEN VALLEY SUPPLY CO
46.22
LARRY FARR
2005/10/14
TARGET 00011858
13.99
SHANN FINWALL
2005/10/03
COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT -DET
14.67
DAVID FISHER
2005/10/03
ZOOM CAFE
9.89
DAVID FISHER
2005/10/03
ZOOM CAFE
5.50
DAVID FISHER
2005/10/04
SWEET WATER TAVERN
7.95
DAVID FISHER
2005/10/03
ANCHOR BAR
7.50
DAVID FISHER
2005/10/04
COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT -DET
1,352.40
DAVID FISHER
2005/10/05
WMS *WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY
350.33
DAVID FISHER
2005/10/05
WMS *WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY
350.33
DAVID FISHER
2005/10/10
G & K SERVICES 006
238.83
DAVID FISHER
2005/10/13
DEEP ROCK WATER
106.34
DAVID FISHER
2005/10/13
DEEP ROCK WATER
83.27
DAVID FISHER
2005/10/11
VIDEOTRONIX INC
163.13
MYCHAL FOWLDS
2005/10/14
GOLDCOM INC
66.22
MYCHAL FOWLDS
2005/10/03
INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR
(51.73)
NICK FRANZEN
2005/10/03
INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR
375.47
NICK FRANZEN
2005/10/10
APPLE COMPUTER
31.94
NICK FRANZEN
5
Posting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
2005/10/10
BROCKWHITE -180
106.50
VIRGINIAGAYNOR
2005/10/12
MILLS FLEET FARM #14
138.39
VIRGINIAGAYNOR
2005/10/13
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
14.14
VIRGINIAGAYNOR
2005/10/14
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
112.05
VIRGINIAGAYNOR
2005/10/06
INTL ASSOC OF FIRE CHIEFS
170.00
CLARENCE GERVAIS
2005/10/14
CREATIVE PROMOTIONS INTER
1,183.58
CLARENCE GERVAIS
2005/10/12
FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
56.42
JEAN GLASS
2005/10/03
TOLEDO PHYS ED SUPPLY
412.34
MIKE GRAF
2005/10/03
THE UPS STORE #2171
36.96
MIKE GRAF
2005/10/10
THE HOME DEPOT 2810
25.33
MIKE GRAF
2005/10/10
SPORTS IMPORTS
133.92
MIKE GRAF
2005/10/07
JOANN ETC #1902
7.20
JANET M GREW HAYMAN
2005/10/03
DAYSTAR DISTRIBUTING INC
129.00
LORI HANSON
2005/10/07
DS *DRUGSTORE.COM
61.50
LORI HANSON
2005/10/07
HOULE FARM GARDEN &
42.00
GARY HINNENKAMP
2005/10/14
OFFICE MAX 00002204
14.35
STEVE HURLEY
2005/10/11
AGGREGATE AND READY MI
335.00
SCOTT JACOBSON
2005/10/03
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
762.56
DAVID JAHN
2005/10/13
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
87.59
DAVID JAHN
2005/10/07
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
10.19
DAVID JAHN
2005/10/05
APPLEBEE'S OAK00161208
8.00
KEVIN JOHNSON
2005/10/05
FAMOUS DAVE'S #2006
8.00
KEVIN JOHNSON
2005/10/07
CARBONE'S PIZZA
32.00
KEVIN JOHNSON
2005/10/04
T J T- SHIRTS
463.00
MARY B KOEHNEN
2005/10/14
SUBWAY
11.69
DAVID KVAM
2005/10/04
TARGET 00011858
4.50
SHERYL L LE
2005/10/03
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
28.74
RANDY LINDBLOM
2005/10/03
HIRSHFIELD'S MAPLEWOOD
11.44
DENNIS LINDORFF
2005/10/12
MENARDS 3022
75.85
DENNIS LINDORFF
2005/10/13
HEJNY RENTAL
47.93
DENNIS LINDORFF
2005/10/05
FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
268.38
STEVE LUKIN
2005/10/06
DE LAGE LANDEN OP01 OF 01
326.54
STEVE LUKIN
2005/10/06
FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
136.32
STEVE LUKIN
2005/10/11
COMMUNICATION BRIEFINGS A
97.00
STEVE LUKIN
2005/10/13
SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
888.38
STEVE LUKIN
2005/10/03
BACHMANS MAPLEWD 004
68.15
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/04
LTG POWER EQUIPMENT
49.08
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/05
VASKO SOLID WASTE INC
343.00
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/05
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
114.62
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/10
G & K SERVICES 006
467.35
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/12
WASTE MANAGEMENT
917.25
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/14
HIRSHFIELD'S MAPLEWOOD
337.10
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/14
BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS
57.51
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/14
BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS
3,986.72
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/06
FRATTALLONE'S ACE HDWE
8.31
JON A MELANDER
2005/10/13
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 0000
755.09
ED NADEAU
2005/10/03
EARL F ANDERSEN INC
335.24
BRYAN NAGEL
2005/10/14
GERTENS
83.07
JOHN NAUGHTON
2005/10/05
OFFICE MAX 00002204
23.42
AMY NIVEN
2005/10/03
MOGREN LANDSCAPING SUPPLY
1,079.38
ERICK OSWALD
2005/10/05
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
106.97
KATHLEEN PECK HALL
2005/10/05
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
52.25
KATHLEEN PECK HALL
2005/10/03
MEDCO SUPPLY
45.70
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/06
FACTS - TUITION PYMT
396.33
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/10
INKJETSUPERSTORE COM
130.52
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/10
EBUYER.COM US
82.39
PHILIP F POWELL
2
Posting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
2005/10/10
FITZCO INC
60.22
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/13
ADORAMA INC
179.11
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/12
MIKES LP GAS INC
42.55
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/13
ROTECK COM LABELS
38.75
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/14
WOLF CAMERA #1530
16.80
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/14
OFFICE MAX 00002204
70.26
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/14
CIRCUIT CITY SS #3137
138.40
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/14
BATTERIES PLUS
42.69
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/03
MENARDS 3059
19.84
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/03
TARGET 00011858
46.57
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/03
CUB FOODS, INC.
15.12
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/07
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
4.44
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/07
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
218.64
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/10
EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROD
677.34
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/13
ALPHA SOURCE INC
127.50
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/13
CHD *C AND H DISTRIBTRS
357.97
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/03
SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
663.23
WILLIAM J PRIEFER
2005/10/03
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
7.66
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/03
TOUSLEY FORD 127200039
165.87
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/03
GILLUND ENTERPRIZES
63.53
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/03
BRAAS COMPANY KERSHAW
29.05
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/05
WHITE BEAR DODGE INC
376.26
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/03
SUNRAY BTB
137.22
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/04
GOPHER BEARING COMPANY IN
69.68
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/05
TOUSLEY FORD 127200039
43.16
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/05
BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
110.53
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/06
FASTENAL CO MO TO
134.70
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/06
KATH AUTO PARTS
10.00
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/06
PAM OIL INC
73.18
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/10
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
50.04
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/10
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
43.51
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/10
BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
176.05
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/10
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
48.49
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/12
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
32.22
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/13
RAPID WIRELESS - BURNSVL
220.00
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/13
O'REILLY #1569
142.83
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/14
AMERICAN FASTENER00 OF 00
27.74
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/14
CATCO PARTS & SERV #1
1,358.58
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/14
BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
313.08
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/14
POMPS TIRE SERVICE
351.45
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/05
THE STAR TRIBUNE - ADVERTIS
655.36
TERRIE RAMEAUX
2005/10/11
MN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
72.50
TERRIE RAMEAUX
2005/10/14
MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNC
195.00
TERRIE RAMEAUX
2005/10/04
HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS
50.08
MICHAEL REILLY
2005/10/06
HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS
240.18
MICHAEL REILLY
2005/10/06
TARGET 00011858
54.59
AUDRA ROBBINS
2005/10/12
MICHAELS #2744
21.88
AUDRA ROBBINS
2005/10/06
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
35.02
ROBERT RUNNING
2005/10/14
CENTURY COMMUNITY TECHNIC
270.00
ROBERT RUNNING
2005/10/13
MENARDS 3022
4.56
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
2005/10/03
ACTIVE - MRPA
326.65
RUSSELL L SCHMIDT
2005/10/07
ROTHHAMMER INTERNATIONAL
235.65
RUSSELL L SCHMIDT
2005/10/07
ROTHHAMMER INTERNATIONAL
2.83
RUSSELL L SCHMIDT
2005/10/11
MENARDS 3022
45.21
GERALD SEEGER
2005/10/07
VERIZON WRLS OT 12KW
3.89
ANDREA SINDT
2005/10/11
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
86.74
ANDREA SINDT
7
Posting Date
Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
2005/10/11
RON'S VIRTUE PRINTI
307.48
ANDREA SINDT
2005/10/14
KWE *KIPLINGEREDITORS
84.00
ANDREASINDT
2005/10/06
JOANN ETC #1970
7.40
CHRISTINE SOUTTER
2005/10/13
A2Z LOCK AND KEY INC
55.00
SCOTT STEFFEN
2005/10/03
DE LAGE LANDEN OP01 OF 01
511.20
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/03
CUB FOODS, INC.
24.94
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/03
LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTE
367.43
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/05
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
52.87
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/06
OFFICE MAX 00007013
110.74
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/07
TARGET 00011858
24.94
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/10
CUB FOODS, INC.
46.27
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/10
TARGET 00011858
(13.82)
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/10
TARGET 00011858
8.50
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/10
TARGET 00006627
30.30
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/03
GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPME
95.85
RONALD SVENDSEN
2005/10/07
NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT
18.11
RONALD SVENDSEN
2005/10/10
PANERA BREAD #3459
23.98
RUSTIN SVENDSEN
2005/10/07
EAT INC
14.25
RUSTIN SVENDSEN
2005/10/10
MINN FIRE SVC CERT BOARD
55.00
RUSTIN SVENDSEN
2005/10/03
VIKING ELECTRIC -ST. PAUL
94.39
LYLE SWANSON
2005/10/03
EXCELLCOM
42.59
LYLE SWANSON
2005/10/03
STATE SUPPLY CO. INC
20.87
LYLE SWANSON
2005/10/04
MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER
79.54
LYLE SWANSON
2005/10/12
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
4.24
LYLE SWANSON
2005/10/12
TWIN CITY FILTER SERV.
109.32
LYLE SWANSON
2005/10/03
T- MOBILE
115.93
DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN
2005/10/07
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
4.94
DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN
2005/10/12
QWESTCOMM *TN651
60.63
JUDY TETZLAFF
2005/10/03
MADDEN'S PINE BEACH WE
431.32
DAVID J THOMALLA
2005/10/05
NORTHERN WATERWORKS SUPP
323.76
JOSEPH WATERS
2005/10/10
MCDONALD'S F3117
20.05
JOSEPH WATERS
2005 /10/10
RAINBOW FOODS 00088617
22.77
JOSEPH WATERS
2005/10/10
QUIZNO OF MAPLEWOOD
63.87
JOSEPH WATERS
2005/10/06
TC *G.NEIL
0.50
SUSAN ZWIEG
2005/10/06
MENARDS 3059
8.50
SUSAN ZWIEG
37.707.90
0
Transaction Review 10/18/2005
For Transactions posted between 10/01/2005 to 10/14/2005
Post Date Vendor Name Settlement Amt Cardholder Name
10/10/2005
VERIZON WRLS I2KW
122.40 R CHARLES AHL
10 /10 /2005
G & K SERVICES 006
595.85 BRUCE K ANDERSON
10/03/2005
SHRED -IT
48.95 JOHN BANICK
10/06/2005
DON' PAINT & BODY SHOP
730.62 JOHN BANICK
10/06/2005
DON' PAINT & BODY SHOP
730.62 JOHN BANICK
10/07/2005
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
1,254.33 JOHN BANICK
10/06/2005
STATE SUPPLY CO. INC
63.99 JIM BEHAN
10/07/2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
64.27 HEIDI CAREY
10 /10 /2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
27.15 HEIDI CAREY
10 /10 /2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
20.47 HEIDI CAREY
10 /10 /2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
-64.27 HEIDI CAREY
10/12/2005
VERIZON WRLS I2KW
180.80 DANIEL F FAUST
10 /05/2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
157.23 PATRICIA FRY
10 /10 /2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
9.36 PATRICIA FRY
10 /10 /2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
14.48 PATRICIA FRY
10/04/2005
SPRINTPCS AUTOPYMT RCI
53.41 RICHARD FURSMAN
10/11/2005
PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC.
50.00 KAREN GUILFOFEE
10/12/2005
VERIZON WRLS I2KW
32.60 KAREN E GUILFO FEE
10/13/2005
XPEDX
3,564.68 LORI HANSEN
10/14/2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
53.65 LORI HANSON
10/05/2005
MENARDS 3059
14.33 ROLAND HELEY
10/04/2005
ADT SECURITY SERVICES
157.28 STEVE HURLEY
10/13/2005
SPRINT WIRELESS SVCS
52.83 STEVE HURLEY
10/03/2005
DE LAGE LANDEN OPOI OF 01
206.61 ANN E HUTCHINSON
10/13/2005
SPRINT WIRELESS SVCS
44.23 ANN E HUTCHINSON
10/04/2005
ARMSTRONG RANCH KENNELS
41.54 DAVID KVAM
10/03/2005
VERIZON WRLS I2KW
45.30 SHERYL L LE
10/12/2005
WASTE MANAGEMENT
267.89 STEVE LUKIN
10/06/2005
HELENA CHEM CO 51191
75.62 BRYAN NAGEL
10 /10 /2005
G & K SERVICES 006
371.50 AMY NIVEN
10 /10 /2005
G & K SERVICES 006
120.50 AMY NIVEN
10 /10 /2005
G & K SERVICES 006
227.00 AMY NIVEN
10 /10 /2005
G & K SERVICES 006
359.92 AMY NIVEN
10 /10 /2005
G & K SERVICES 006
176.80 AMY NIVEN
10 /10 /2005
G & K SERVICES 006
83.05 AMY NIVEN
10/13/2005
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
125.51 AMY NIVEN
10/11/2005
PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC.
50.00 DENNIS PECK
10/06/2005
#1 FACTORY MTR PRTS
- 100.00 STEVENPRIEM
10 /10 /2005
ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC
823.62 STEVEN PRIEM
10 /10 /2005
DIGITAL AGE 888 - 529 -98
24.99 TERRIE RAMEAUX
10/12/2005
PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISIN
1,183.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX
10 /10 /2005
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
938.44 MICHAEL REILLY
10/03/2005
SHRED -IT
61.00 DEB SCHMIDT
10/03/2005
T- MOBILE
46.24 SCOTT SCHULTZ
10 /10 /2005
G & K SERVICES 006
44.48 GERALD SEEGER
10 /10 /2005
HIRSHFIELD'S MAPLEWOOD
47.90 LYLE SWANSON
10/11/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
253.90 JUDY TETZLAFF
10/11/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
103.26 JUDY TETZLAFF
10/11/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
73.70 JUDY TETZLAFF
10/11/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
103.26 JUDY TETZLAFF
10/11/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
103.26 JUDY TETZLAFF
10/11/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
103.26 JUDY TETZLAFF
0 '
Post Date Vendor Name
10/11/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
10/11/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
10/11/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
10/11/2005
QWESTCOMM TN612
Settlement Amt Cardholder Name
372.92 JUDY TETZLAFF
147.40 JUDY TETZLAFF
73.70 JUDY TETZLAFF
240.08 JUDY TETZLAFF
14,774.91
10
vchlist Check Register Page: 1
10/28/2005 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Accoun
Amount
68328
10/24/2005
01371 ROAD RESCUE, INC.
2005 MODULAR AMBULANCE-
106,720.00
68329
10/27/2005
02840 XARIS PROPERTIES LLC
TEMP CONSTRUCTION
10,000.00
68330
11/1/2005
00058 AICHELE, CRAIG
REIMB FOR MILEAGE 10/4 -10/19
57.23
68331
11/1/2005
00111 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC
PATROL & BOARDING FEES 10/8 -
1,516.68
68332
11/1/2005
00174 BELDE, STAN
K -9 MAINTENANCE - NOV
35.00
68333
11/1/2005
02662 BENDTSEN, LISA
REIMB FOR SWIMSUIT
48.35
68334
11/1/2005
02914 BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF MN
MONTHLY PREMIUM
127,083.00
68335
11/1/2005
00198 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
WATER UTILITY
2,289.82
68336
11/1/2005
01922 BREHEIM, ROGER
CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT-
15.00
68337
11/1/2005
00215 BRIDGCO DOCKS & LIFTS INC
BOARDWALK CROSSINGS FOR
19,180.65
68338
11/1/2005
00262 CARLE, JEANETTE
REIMB FOR MILEAGE & MEAL 5/6-
28.47
68339
11/1/2005
02929 CNAGLAC
LONG TERM CARE INS
907.04
68340
11/1/2005
03200 COFFEY, KEVIN
REIMB FOR MEAL & FUEL 9/11 -9/14
44.40
68341
11/1/2005
00384 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SRVS
RICOH COPIER LEASE - NOV
161.88
68342
11/1/2005
03243 ENVIRONMENTAL WOOD SUPPLY LLC
DISPOSAL OF TREE TRUNKS
20.00
68343
11/1/2005
00477 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC
PROJ 03 -18 GRATE
159.75
PROJ 03 -39 STORM LID
264.12
68344
11/1/2005
00519 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO.
CONCAVE ROOT SAW BLADE 15"
156.93
68345
11/1/2005
02113 FURSMAN, RICHARD
REIMB FOR MILEAGE 8/31 -10/21
138.53
68346
11/1/2005
00555 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA
REIMB FOR MILEAGE - NC 1/6-
185.41
REIMB FOR MILEAGE 1/5 TO 7/14
121.66
REIMB FOR PARKING & MILEAGE
99.69
68347
11/1/2005
00589 GRAF, DAVE
KARATE INSTRUCTOR
81.25
68348
11/1/2005
03529 GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION CO
PROJ 03 -19 SALT STORAGE BLDG
83,323.55
68349
11/1/2005
01039 HEALTH, DEPT OF
MEMBERSHIP #RS485
45.00
68350
11/1/2005
00668 HIEBERT, STEVEN
K -9 MAINTENANCE - NOV
35.00
68351
11/1/2005
03330 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC
PROJ 04 -56 GLADSTONE PROJ
6,939.99
68352
11/1/2005
02136 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
REIMB FOR FUEL & NATL
161.30
68353
11/1/2005
02196 JORGENSON CONST INC
PROJ 03 -19 PUBLIC WORKS BLDG
600,624.20
68354
11/1/2005
00827 L M C I T
INSURANCE PREMIUM
718.00
68355
11/1/2005
02248 LINN, BRYAN
REIMB FOR MILEAGE 10/17 -10/19
22.38
68356
11/1/2005
01043 M E H A
MEMBERSHIP
30.00
68357
11/1/2005
00902 M E M A
MEMBERSHIPS
95.00
68358
11/1/2005
03332 MC CARTY, GLEN
REIMB MEALS, PARKING, CLINICAL
162.91
REIMB MEALS & PARKING 10/19 -
26.09
68359
11/1/2005
03417 MCFARLAND, P.C., THOMAS F
RR ABANDONMENT ATTORNEY
4,320.41
68360
11/1/2005
01819 MCLEOD USA
LOCAL PHONE SRV 9/16 -10/15
2,051.76
68361
11/1/2005
02364 MET LIFE
MONTHLY DENTAL PREMIUM
9,646.73
68362
11/1/2005
00985 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
WASTEWATER - NOV
185,478.30
68363
11/1/2005
01079 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN
TRAINING 11/29/05
58.58
68364
11/1/2005
01085 MN LIFE INSURANCE
MONTHLY PREMIUM
3,902.00
68365
11/1/2005
01089 MN UC FUND
QUARTERLY UNEMPLOYMENT -
1,827.75
68366
11/1/2005
00395 NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPT OF
OEHRLINE LAKE PERMIT APP FEE
150.00
68367
11/1/2005
01174 NORTH ST PAUL- MAPLEWOOD-
ROTARY MEMBERSHIP
175.00
68368
11/1/2005
02886 OERTEL ARCHITECTS
PUBLIC WORKS BLDG ARCHITECT
34,546.84
68369
11/1/2005
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF QWEST- PR #04 -15 DAMAGE
183.05
68370
11/1/2005
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF B OSBORN - CLASS
100.00
68371
11/1/2005
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF TAMMY MCLAURIN - CANC
66.00
68372
11/1/2005
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF LAURA STILP - MCC
45.00
68373
11/1/2005
01560 ONYX WASTE SRVS MIDWEST INC
RECYCLING - SEP
17,659.80
11
vchlist Check Register Page: 2
10/28/2005 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check Date Vendor Description /Accoun Amount
68374
11/1/2005
02304 PACOLT, MARSHA
REIMB
1,152.46
68375
11/1/2005
00396 PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF
TRAINING 10/11
250.00
68376
11/1/2005
00396 PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF
INTOXILYZER RECERTIFICATION
45.00
68377
11/1/2005
03530 FILING, DAVID
SHOP MANUALS
1,230.00
68378
11/1/2005
01387 ROSSINI, DR. JAMES
FITNESS PROGRAM - OCT
100.00
68379
11/1/2005
01504 ST PAUL, CITY OF
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
2,184.07
68380
11/1/2005
01564 SUZANNE'S CUISINE, INC.
BOARD /COMMISSION EVENT
1,110.80
68381
11/1/2005
01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
VARIOUS BITUMINOUS
491.41
68382
11/1/2005
01580 TSE, INC.
JANITORIAL SERVICES 8/22 -9/16
907.50
68383
11/1/2005
00529 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO
MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM
2,389.07
STD PLAN 4043120 -0 -1 - NOV
1,543.25
68384
11/1/2005
01734 WALSH, WILLIAM P.
OVERPAID PLUMBING PERMITS
- 170.00
OVERPAID PLUMBING PERMITS
-80.96
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSP
369.65
68385
11/1/2005
01789 WOODBURY, CITY OF
SAFE & SOBER GRANT FUNDS
6,317.75
68386
11/1/2005
01190 XCEL ENERGY
GAS UTILITY
477.84
68387
11/1/2005
01798 YOCUM OIL CO.
UNL MID -GRADE 89 OCTANE GAS
13,900.43
60 Checks in this report
Total checks :
1,253,927.77
12
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pavee
10/20/05
10/21/05
10/11/05
10/20/05
10/21/05
10/21/05
10/21/05
10/21/05
10/24/05
10/21/05
10/21/05
10/21/05
10/25/05
10/25/05
10/26/05
10/24/05
10/21/05
10/21/05
10/21/05
10/21/05
10/21/05
10/24/05
10/24/05
10/24/05
10/25/05
10/25/05
10/25/05
10/25/05
10/26/05
10/26/05
10/27/05
10/27/05
MN State Treasurer
ICMA (Vantagepointe)
MN Dept of Revenue
MN Dept of Natural Resources
Orchard Trust
MN State Treasurer
U.S. Treasurer
P.E.R.A.
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
Labor Unions
Federal Reserve Bank
MN State Treasurer
Pitney Bowes
MN State Treasurer
ARC Administration
TOTAL
Description
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Deferred Compensation
Fuel Tax
DNR electronic licenses
Deferred Compensation
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Federal Payroll Tax
P.E.R.A.
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
State Payroll Tax
Union Dues
Savings Bonds
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Postage
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
DCRP & Flex plan payments
Amount
11, 708.47
8,145.47
325.20
399.50
25,417.62
10, 065.75
118,883.43
54,268.15
18,193.89
22,572.07
2,392.07
100.00
17, 605.16
2,985.00
11, 207.25
1,208.35
305,477.38
13
vchlist Check Register Page: 1
11/04/2005 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check Date
68388 11/8/2005 02113 FURSMAN, RICHARD
68389 11/8/2005 00555 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA
2 Checks in this report
Description /Accoun Amount
REIMB FOR PARKING 9/27 & 9/28
REIMB FOR MILEAGE 7/14 -8/5
Total checks
18.00
41.35
59.35
14
vchlist Check Register Page: 1
11/04/2005 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Accoun
Amount
68390
11/8/2005
02106 ADVANCED BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC
TYPEWRITER PRINT WHEEL
43.82
68391
11/8/2005
01809 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES NCR INC
CONCRETE
19.22
68392
11/8/2005
00058 AICHELE, CRAIG
REIMB FOR TOOLS - 2005
350.00
68393
11/8/2005
01811 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC
MERCH FOR RESALE
176.40
68394
11/8/2005
00202 BOHL, JOHN
REIMB FOR MEALS 10/25 POLICE
19.57
68395
11/8/2005
00211 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP.
PROJ 02 -08 PROF SRVS THRU 10/7
239.50
68396
11/8/2005
02585 CENTRAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
STRESS TEST
150.00
68397
11/8/2005
00283 CENTURY COLLEGE
FIREFIGHTER TRAINING
655.55
FIRE FIGHTER TUITION
1,301.10
68398
11/8/2005
02746 CLOVER SUPER FOODS INC
MERCH FOR RESALE
143.77
68399
11/8/2005
02743 DOBLAR, RICHARD
REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS
499.20
68400
11/8/2005
00413 DON MARTY'S LANDSCAPING
INSTALL SOD
3,950.00
68401
11/8/2005
00412 DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCIATES
MGMT PROGRAM BOOKS
92.54
68402
11/8/2005
03463 EBERT CONSTRUCTION
APPLEWOOD PARK
56,801.24
68403
11/8/2005
00003 ESCROW REFUND
REF GRADING ESC - 2659
500.00
68404
11/8/2005
00585 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL
BILLABLE TICKETS - SEP
791.10
68405
11/8/2005
03537 HUBIN, KEN
REIMB FOR UNIFORM 10/31
217.91
68406
11/8/2005
00483 IDEACOM MID - AMERICA
PHONE SERVICE & LABOR
267.00
PHONE SERVICE & LABOR
498.00
68407
11/4/2005
00767 JOHNSON, KEVIN A
POLICE OFFICER FOR MCC EVENT
120.00
68408
11/8/2005
00809 KONG, TOMMY
REIMB FOR PARKING 10/11
5.00
68409
11/8/2005
03532 LOUIS C KNIPPENBERG
REF GRADING ESC - 2296
2,506.78
68410
11/8/2005
03535 MAGELLAN EXECUTIVE RESOURCES
STRATEGIC TEAM DEVELOPMENT
3,900.00
68411
11/4/2005
03261 MAPLEWOOD PRAYER BREAKFAST
PRAYER BREAKFAST
20.00
68412
11/4/2005
00959 MCLAUGHLIN, BILLY
WINE FEST ENTERTAINER 11/5
300.00
68413
11/8/2005
01012 MILLER, NICK
REF NICK MILLER - MEMBERSHIP
25.00
68414
11/4/2005
01977 MN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION
FALL CONFERENCE 11/16 & 11/17
199.00
68415
11/8/2005
01028 MN STATE TREASURER STAX
MONTHLY SURTAX - OCT
5,750.23
68416
11/8/2005
03193 NOBLE NURSERY RETAIL INC
PROJ 03 -04 KENNARD ST IMPRV
7,806.30
68417
11/8/2005
01202 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC
CITY NEWS - NOV
2,281.00
68418
11/8/2005
01218 ON SITE SANITATION
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
133.96
68419
11/8/2005
00001 ONE TIME VENDOR
REF MARK STENE - MEMBERSHIP
125.00
68420
11/8/2005
03201 OPHEIM, JOHN
REIMB FOR SUPPLIES
40.96
68421
11/8/2005
02630 PEARSON BROS INC
PROJ 05 -21 SEAL COAT PROJECT
107,515.75
68422
11/8/2005
03528 PELTIER, STEVEN
REF GRADING ESC - 1236
1,004.88
68423
11/8/2005
01254 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
MERCH FOR RESALE
469.70
68424
11/8/2005
02563 PHILLIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
MRX PRINTER PAPER
99.58
68425
11/8/2005
01302 PRIEM, STEVEN
REIMB TOOL ALLOW 2005 &
429.54
68426
11/8/2005
00396 PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF
TRAINING REGISTRATION FEE
120.00
68427
11/8/2005
01340 REGIONS HOSPITAL
PHARMACY STOCK REPORT
251.64
68428
11/8/2005
01360 REINHART FOODSERVICE
MERCH FOR RESALE
148.28
68429
11/8/2005
01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM CAKES
47.61
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
163.71
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM CAKES
28.74
BIRTHDAY CAKE & CANDY
31.85
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
286.61
COFFEE
249.09
VENDING MACHINE SUPPLIES
228.81
MERCH FOR RESALE
102.60
MERCH FOR RESALE
269.97
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM CAKES
24.82
15
vchlist Check Register Page: 2
11/04/2005 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Check Date Vendor Description /Accoun Amount
68429
11/8/2005
01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
(Continued)
CHILDCARE SUPPLIES
6.67
68430
11/8/2005
03073 SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC
LANDSCAPE ARCH SRVS - SEP
980.00
68431
11/8/2005
03215 SHAFER CONTRACTING CO INC
PROJ 03- 07/04 -25 HWY 61 IMPRV
277,996.12
68432
11/8/2005
03398 SHAMROCK GROUP
MERCH FOR RESALE
59.00
68433
11/8/2005
01463 SISTER ROSALIND GEFRE
MCC MASSAGES - SEP
2,238.00
68434
11/8/2005
01504 ST PAUL, CITY OF
WATER USAGE - 3RD QTR
612.23
68435
11/8/2005
01550 SUMMIT INSPECTIONS
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
6,548.20
68436
11/8/2005
01568 SWANSON, LYLE
REF LYLE SWANSON -
25.00
68437
11/8/2005
01572 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.
BR TONER & HP LJ1000 TONER
288.23
68438
11/8/2005
02464 US BANK
PAYING AGENT FEES
158.13
68439
11/8/2005
03419 VERSA -LOK RETAINING WALL SYS
RETAINING WALL SUPPLIES
1,849.25
68440
11/8/2005
01734 WALSH, WILLIAM P.
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSP
980.40
68441
11/8/2005
01750 WATSON CO INC, THE
MERCH FOR RESALE
157.40
68442
11/8/2005
02410 WELLS FARGO LEASING INC
COPIER LEASE 10/9 -11/9
1,467.57
68443
11/8/2005
03378 WOEHRLE, MATT
REIMB TOOL ALLOW 2005 &
274.10
68444
11/8/2005
01190 XCEL ENERGY
GAS UTILITY
6,388.60
55 Checks
in this report
Total checks :
501,431.23
16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pavee
10/27/05
10/28/05
MN State Treasurer
10/21/05
10/28/05
WI Dept of Revenue
10/27/05
10/28/05
MN Dept of Natural Resources
10/28/05
10/31/05
MN State Treasurer
10/31/05
11/01/05
MN State Treasurer
10/31/05
11/01/05
US Bank
11/01/05
11/02/05
MN State Treasurer
10/31/05
11/02/05
Discover
10/28/05
11/02/05
US Bank VISA One Card*
11/02/05
11/03/05
MN State Treasurer
10/28/05
11/03/05
Elan Financial Services*
1111c•1raIIIIII
Description
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
State Payroll Tax
DNR electronic licenses
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Credit Card fees
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Credit Card fees
Purchasing card items
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Purchasing card items
*Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached.
Amount
12,236.99
1,621.36
259.50
11,640.25
18,853.80
1,097.90
22,168.25
158.84
37,858.20
16,525.33
1,260.02
123,680.44
17
Transactions 10 -15 -05 to 10- 28 -05.
sting Date Merchant Name
2005/10/20 BATTERIES PLUS
2005/10/17 TARGET 00011858
2005/10/17 FACTORY CARD OUTLET #284
2005/10/20 CUB FOODS, INC.
2005/10/17 WEBER & TROSETH INC
2005/10/27 AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS -MN
2005/10/18 NUCO2 01 OF 01
2005/10/18 NUCO2 01 OF 01
2005/10/18 NUCO2 01 OF 01
2005/10/18 NUCO2 01 OF 01
2005/10/18 NUCO2 01 OF 01
2005/10/18 NUCO2 01 OF 01
2005/10/17 PARK SUPPLY INC
2005/10/20 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER
2005/10/21 PARK SUPPLY INC
2005/10/21 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR INC
2005/10/24 KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL
2005/10/27 ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC
2005/10/28 PORT -A- WELDING INC
2005/10/28 STATE SUPPLY CO. INC
2005/10/24 BEST WESTERN HOTELS
2005/10/17 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
2005/10/24 CITI -CARGO
2005/10/27 SEARS ROEBUCK 1122
2005/10/27 THE HOME DEPOT 2801
2005/10/28 VERSA -LOK CONTRACTOR SAL
2005/10/19 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
2005/10/20 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
2005/10/24 YELLOW BOOK USA
2005/10/25 DEX EAST - LOCKBOX
2005/10/25 NAMEBANK
2005/10/17 NWAAIR 0122124188299
2005/10/24 MARRIOTT SAN ANTONIO HTL
2005/10/25 GE CAPITAL
2005/10/27 TIME WARNER CABLE
2005/10/21 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
2005/10/19 RED WING SHOE STORE
2005/10/17 IRON AGE CORP
2005/10/21 THE HOME DEPOT 2801
2005/10/21 OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER
2005/10/27 NORTHWEST LASERS INC
2005/10/21 THE HOME DEPOT 2801
2005/10/21 THE HOME DEPOT 2801
2005/10/21 THE HOME DEPOT 2801
2005/10/26 B J MULCAHY COMPANY INC
2005/10/26 STAGE TECHNOLOGY
2005/10/28 HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION
2005/10/17 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE
2005/10/28 OFFICE MAX 00002204
2005/10/24 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR
2005/10/28 DELL CATALOG SALES, L.P.
2005/10/20 PITNEY BOWES INVOICE
2005/10/20 PITNEY BOWES INVOICE
2005/10/19 BATTERIES PLUS
Trans Amount Name
$205.91
SCOTTANDREWS
$12.38
MANDY ANZALDI
$4.98
MANDY ANZALDI
$2.65
MANDY ANZALDI
$155.57
JOHN BANICK
$209.03
JOHN BANICK
$87.33
JIM BEHAN
$87.33
JIM BEHAN
$57.30
JIM BEHAN
$87.33
JIM BEHAN
$54.96
JIM BEHAN
$80.73
JIM BEHAN
$154.91
JIM BEHAN
$894.05
JIM BEHAN
$54.36
JIM BEHAN
$237.87
JIM BEHAN
$367.65
JIM BEHAN
$1,850.00
JIM BEHAN
$241.15
JIM BEHAN
$74.59
JIM BEHAN
$194.88
RON BOURQUIN
$14.02
ROGER BREHEIM
$106.50
ROGER BREHEIM
$638.99
ROGER BREHEIM
$56.42
ROGER BREHEIM
$101.56
TROY BRINK
$25.24
HEIDI CAREY
$92.02
HEIDI CAREY
$602.42
HEIDI CAREY
$65.03
HEIDI CAREY
$134.11
HEIDI CAREY
$358.90
LINDACROSSON
$1,050.75
LINDACROSSON
$158.69
LINDACROSSON
$109.79
LINDACROSSON
$32.79
ROBERTA DARST
$152.15
THOMAS DEBILZAN
$126.45
DOUG EDGE
$52.21
DOUG EDGE
$306.72
DOUG EDGE
$16.05
ANDREW ENGSTROM
($7.43)
LARRY FARR
$42.48
LARRY FARR
$7.43
LARRY FARR
$352.52
LARRY FARR
$15.25
LARRY FARR
$1,778.64
LARRY FARR
$2.58
SHANN FINWALL
$58.59
MYCHAL FOWLDS
$195.90
NICK FRANZEN
$428.32
NICK FRANZEN
$1,266.00
PATRICIA FRY
$142.00
PATRICIA FRY
$18.09
RICHARD FURSMAN
Em
Posting Date Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
2005/10/21 WALGREEN 00031229
$4.22
VIRGINIA GAYNOR
2005/10/21 WALGREEN 00031229
$5.31
VIRGINIA GAYNOR
2005/10/25 KNOWLANS #2
$9.35
VIRGINIA GAYNOR
2005/10/19 CREATIVE PROMOTIONS INTER
$1,791.44
CLARENCE GERVAIS
2005/10/24 BEST WESTERN HOTELS
$194.88
CLARENCE GERVAIS
2005/10/27 OFFICE MAX 00002204
$27.43
CLARENCE GERVAIS
2005/10/28 OFFICE MAX 00002204
$3.94
CLARENCE GERVAIS
2005/10/28 OFFICE MAX 00002204
$5.31
CLARENCE GERVAIS
2005/10/28 OFFICE MAX 00002204
$6.70
CLARENCE GERVAIS
2005/10/28 SCHOOL TECH INC
($359.80)
MIKE GRAF
2005/10/17 THE HOME DEPOT 2810
$14.54
JANET M GREW HAYMAN
2005/10/19 HOULE FARM GARDEN &
$3.00
JANET M GREW HAYMAN
2005/10/21 SUBWAY SANDWICHES AND SA
$159.59
JANET M GREW HAYMAN
2005/10/28 XPEDX
$342.74
LORI HANSEN
2005/10/24 AMERICAN IRRIGATION
$41.14
GARY HINNENKAMP
2005/10/24 FASTENAL CO RETAIL
$24.52
GARY HINNENKAMP
2005/10/25 THE METAL DOCTOR INC
$349.54
GARY HINNENKAMP
2005/10/25 HYDROLOGIC WATER MANAGEME
$35.24
GARY HINNENKAMP
2005/10/27 HEJNY RENTAL
$352.01
GARY HINNENKAMP
2005/10/28 TARGET 00011858
$27.67
RON HORWATH
2005/10/20 HEJNY RENTAL
$90.53
ANN E HUTCHINSON
2005/10/24 RAINBOW FOODS 00088526
$83.11
ANN E HUTCHINSON
2005/10/24 MICHAELS #2744
$6.37
ANN E HUTCHINSON
2005/10/24 MICHAELS #2744
$15.92
ANN E HUTCHINSON
2005/10/27 MENARDS 3059
$22.23
ANN E HUTCHINSON
2005/10/20 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
$419.30
DAVID JAHN
2005/10/28 TARGET 00011858
$47.29
DAVID JAHN
2005/10/20 T J T- SHIRTS
$61.00
MARY B KOEHNEN
2005/10/17 MCDONALD'S F6493
$129.03
DUWAYNE KONEWKO
2005/10/17 MSP AIRPORT PA20002002
$48.00
DAVID KVAM
2005/10/17 ALLIE'S DELI
$8.70
DAVID KVAM
2005/10/17 MARRIOTT 33769 JW DC
$34.05
DAVID KVAM
2005/10/18 ANOKA HENNEPIN COLLEGE
$175.00
DAVID KVAM
2005/10/28 SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT LABS
$165.25
DAVID KVAM
2005/10/24 CUB FOODS, INC.
$18.17
SHERYL L LE
2005/10/17 FRATTALLONE'S ACE HDWE
$5.31
MICHAEL LIDBERG
2005/10/27 FRATTALLONE'S ACE HDWE
$23.42
MICHAEL LIDBERG
2005/10/26 MENARDS 3022
$74.59
DENNIS LINDORFF
2005/10/28 HEJNY RENTAL
$55.91
DENNIS LINDORFF
2005/10/17 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL INT
$2,529.10
STEVE LUKIN
2005/10/17 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL INT
$404.49
STEVE LUKIN
2005/10/17 VERIZON WRLS 12KW
$61.66
STEVE LUKIN
2005/10/21 SBC PAGING
$17.69
STEVE LUKIN
2005/10/26 METRO SALES INC
$252.97
STEVE LUKIN
2005/10/17 VERIZON WRLS 12KW
$43.24
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/21 HUGOS TREE CARE
$415.35
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/24 ON SITE SANITATION INC
$83.25
MARK MARUSKA
2005/10/17 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE
$7.08
JON A MELANDER
2005/10/20 THE HOME DEPOT 2801
$15.94
JOHN NAUGHTON
2005/10/20 RYCO SUPPLY COMPANY
$26.73
JEAN NELSON
2005/10/25 COUNTRY INN & SUITES
$740.66
JULIE OLSON
2005/10/17 UNITED RENTALS
$74.55
ERICK OSWALD
2005/10/25 QWEST *COMMUNICATION
$673.00
MARSHA PACOLT
2005/10/17 WOLF CAMERA #1530
$114.76
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/17 FACTS - ENROLLMENT FEE
$2.00
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/17 MENARDS 3022
$36.33
PHILIP F POWELL
19
Posting Date Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
2005/10/20 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
$25.20
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/21 BATTERY UNIVERSE
$199.85
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/24 WOLF CAMERA #1530
$11.27
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/27 OFFICE MAX 00002204
$127.77
PHILIP F POWELL
2005/10/19 PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
$99.58
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/24 CHD *C AND H DISTRIBTRS
($25.18)
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/24 CHD *C AND H DISTRIBTRS
($17.52)
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/26 TRI -ANIM HEALTH SERVICES
$700.00
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/27 COSSETTAS
$12.28
ROBERT PRECHTEL
2005/10/24 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS
$881.82
WILLIAM PRIEBE
2005/10/17 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
$590.64
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/17 O'REILLY #1569
$11.31
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/17 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039
$408.54
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/17 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
$38.63
STEVEN PRIEM
2005/10/17 BAUER BUILT TRE33200023
2005/10/17 BAUER BUILT TRE33200023
2005/10/17 JOHN FRYE DISTRIBUTING
2005/10/17 KATH AUTO PARTS
2005/10/17 KATH AUTO PARTS
2005/10/19 O'RE I LLY #1569
2005/10/19 RED WING SHOE STORE
2005/10/20 KATH AUTO PARTS
2005/10/21 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039
2005/10/24 TRUCK UTILITIES INC
2005/10/24 TRUCK UTILITIES INC
2005/10/24 TRUCK UTILITIES IN00 OF 00
2005/10/24 POLAR CHEVROLET
2005/10/24 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
2005/10/24 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
2005/10/24 PARTS ASSOCIATES INC
2005/10/25 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
2005/10/25 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
2005/10/27 DELEGARD TOOL COM00 OF 00
2005/10/28 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
2005/10/17 CUB FOODS, INC.
2005/10/24 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
2005/10/24 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
2005/10/21 WONDERLIC
2005/10/20 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS
2005/10/24 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS
2005/10/26 MENARDS 3059
2005/10/17 TOYS R US #6046
2005/10/19 MICHAELS #3701
2005/10/24 HOLLYWOOD VIDEO
2005/10/26 TARGET 00011858
2005/10/26 CAMP SNOOPY ADMISSIONS
2005/10/27 CUB FOODS, INC.
2005/10/17 OFFICE MAX 00002204
2005/10/20 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT
2005/10/26 CURTIS 1000
2005/10/17 HEJNY RENTAL
2005/10/17 HEJNY RENTAL
2005/10/21 MENARDS 3022
2005/10/24 MENARDS 3022
2005/10/24 MENARDS 3022
2005/10/18 T- MOBILE
$351.45 STEVEN PRIEM
$585.75 STEVEN PRIEM
$28.74 STEVEN PRIEM
$20.00 STEVEN PRIEM
$57.68 STEVEN PRIEM
($17.72) STEVEN PRIEM
$161.50 STEVEN PRIEM
$37.25 STEVEN PRIEM
$127.40 STEVEN PRIEM
($218.76) STEVEN PRIEM
$218.76 STEVEN PRIEM
$150.62 STEVEN PRIEM
$7.69 STEVEN PRIEM
$204.88 STEVEN PRIEM
$7.66 STEVEN PRIEM
$42.59 STEVEN PRIEM
($27.70) STEVEN PRIEM
$3.47 STEVEN PRIEM
$101.04 STEVEN PRIEM
($1.65) STEVEN PRIEM
$11.09 KEVIN RABBETT
$69.00 KEVIN RABBETT
$2,071.97 KEVIN RABBETT
$276.37 TERRIE RAMEAUX
$592.47 MICHAEL REILLY
$274.26 MICHAEL REILLY
$66.49 MICHAEL REILLY
$144.63 AUDRA ROBBINS
$37.12
$42.58
$81.35
$407.34
$23.11
$10.51
$18.09
$99.34
$122.42
$11.98
$36.96
$24.83
$10.18
$78.70
AUDRA ROBBINS
AUDRA ROBBINS
AUDRA ROBBINS
AUDRA ROBBINS
AUDRA ROBBINS
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
DEB SCHMIDT
RUSSELL L SCHMIDT
RUSSELL L SCHMIDT
GERALD SEEGER
GERALD SEEGER
GERALD SEEGER
ANDREA SINDT
20
Posting Date Merchant Name
Trans Amount
Name
2005/10/26 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
($9.35)
ANDREA SINDT
2005/10/26 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$138.65
ANDREA SINDT
2005/10/27 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$9.35
ANDREA SINDT
2005/10/28 T- MOBILE
$29.76
ANDREASINDT
2005/10/24 ACTION RENTAL
$148.73
PAULINE STAPLES
2005/10/17 CUB FOODS, INC.
$34.31
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/17 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
$71.22
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/17 DE LAGE LANDEN OP01 OF 01
$511.20
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/21 TARGET 00011858
$3.18
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/24 DE LAGE LANDEN OPERATIONA
($511.20)
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/24 CUB FOODS, INC.
$2.50
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
2005/10/24 CUB FOODS, INC.
2005/10/26 METRO SALES INC
2005/10/17 ASPEN MILLS 8005717343
2005/10/17 ASPEN MILLS 8005717343
2005/10/17 ASPEN MILLS 8005717343
2005/10/17 ASPEN MILLS 8005717343
2005/10/17 ASPEN MILLS 8005717343
2005/10/17 CRAWFORD DOOR SALES CO OF
2005/10/24 BEST WESTERN HOTELS
2005/10/25 LIFE LINK III
2005/10/17 STATE SUPPLY CO. INC
2005/10/25 MENARDS 3059
2005/10/26 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
2005/10/27 ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC
2005/10/28 FOREST PRODUCTS SUPPLY
2005/10/17 MERMAID
2005/10/27 BEST WESTERN HOTELS
2005/10/17 VIKING #1090
2005/10/20 THE GALLERY COLLECTION
2005/10/24 TC *AMST PRINT LITHO
$41.31 JOANNE M SVENDSEN
$732.90 JOANNE M SVENDSEN
$26.02 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
$223.62 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
$328.50 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
$116.49 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
$116.50 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
$1,142.50
RUSTIN SVENDSEN
$307.88
RUSTIN SVENDSEN
($100.00)
RUSTIN SVENDSEN
$86.21
LYLE SWANSON
$11.21
LYLE SWANSON
$546.23
LYLE SWANSON
$96.00
LYLE SWANSON
$106.50
LYLE SWANSON
$23.85
DAVID J THOMALLA
$138.88
DAVID J THOMALLA
$82.60
SUSAN ZWIEG
$149.42
SUSAN ZWIEG
$200.71
SUSAN ZWIEG
$37,858.20
21
Transaction Review
For Transactions posted between 10/15/2005 to 10/28/2005
Post Date
10/19/2005
10/24/2005
10/21/2005
10/17/2005
10/28/2005
10/21/2005
10/28/2005
10/21/2005
10/17/2005
10/27/2005
10/20/2005
10/25/2005
10/20/2005
10/19/2005
10/28/2005
10/24/2005
Vendor Name
DPMS INC
DPMS INC
ANDON BALLOONS INC -2
SHRED -IT
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
VERIZON WRLS 0334101
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
SPRINT WIRELESS SVCS
VERIZON WRLS I2KW
METROCALL ARCH WIRE
CINTAS FIRST AID #0431
FEDEX 841 - 5 1463 27 25
CINTAS FIRST AID #0431
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
CIC REFUND
QWESTCOMM TN651
Settlement Amt Cardholder Name
11/4/2005
-18.00 SCOTT ANDREWS
- 158.27 SCOTTANDREWS
79.88 MANDY ANZALDI
113.22 JOHN BANICK
41.90 PATRICIA FRY
181.88 KAREN E GUILFOILE
206.60 LORI HANSON
213.22 STEVE HURLEY
64.97 ED NADEAU
3 9.3 9 ED NADEAU
28.91 BRYAN NAGEL
15.20 PHILIP F POWELL
27.37 WILLIAM J PRIEFER
75.36 DEB SCHMIDT
-9.45 AUSTIN SVENDSEN
357.84 JUDY TETZLAFF
1,260.02
22
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
23
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
10/21/05
CARDINAL, ROBERT
422.42
dd
10/21/05
.IUENEMANN, KATHLEEN
371.77
dd
10/21/05
KOPPEN, MARVIN
371.77
dd
10/21/05
ROSSBACH, WILLIAM
371.77
dd
10/21/05
COLEMAN, MELINDA
4,096.10
dd
10/21/05
DARST, ROBERTA
1,690.85
dd
10/21/05
FURSMAN, RICHARD
5,053.62
dd
10/21/05
FARR, LARRY
1,767.48
dd
10/21/05
SWANSON, LYLE
1,693.00
dd
10/21/05
LE,.IENNIFER
146.25
dd
10/21/05
LE, SHERYL
4,001.34
dd
10/21/05
RAMEAUX, THERESE
2,376.42
dd
10/21/05
FAUST, DANIEL
4,166.98
dd
10/21/05
SCHMIDT, DEBORAH
1,456.57
dd
10/21/05
ANDERSON, CAROLE
385.32
dd
10/21/05
BAUMAN, GAYLE
3,434.43
dd
10/21/05
JACKSON, MARY
1,819.77
dd
10/21/05
KELSEY, CONNIE
1,072.29
dd
10/21/05
TETZLAFF,.IUDY
1,819.77
dd
10/21/05
FRY, PATRICIA
1,689.36
dd
10/21/05
GUILFOILE, KAREN
2,883.18
dd
10/21/05
OSTER, ANDREA
1,764.46
dd
10/21/05
CARLE,.IEANETTE
1,633.97
dd
10/21/05
.IAGOE, CAROL
1,631.66
dd
10/21/05
JOHNSON, BONNIE
1,022.16
dd
10/21/05
MECHELKE, SHERRIE
1,056.14
dd
10/21/05
MOY, PAMELA
938.25
dd
10/21/05
OLSON, SANDRA
1,045.80
dd
10/21/05
WEAVER, KRISTINE
1,787.76
dd
10/21/05
BANICK,.IOHN
3,871.15
dd
10/21/05
CORCORAN, THERESA
1,629.35
dd
10/21/05
POWELL, PHILIP
2,267.65
dd
10/21/05
RICHIE, CAROLE
1,636.28
dd
10/21/05
SPANGLER, EDNA
308.00
dd
10/21/05
THOMALLA, DAVID
4,287.27
dd
10/21/05
ABEL, CLINT
2,527.87
dd
10/21/05
ALDRIDGE, MARK
2,615.48
dd
10/21/05
ANDREWS, SCOTT
3,222.47
dd
10/21/05
BAKKE, LONN
2,531.92
dd
10/21/05
BELDE, STANLEY
2,699.16
dd
10/21/05
BIERDEMAN, BRIAN
2,372.60
dd
10/21/05
BOHL,.IOHN
2,577.33
dd
10/21/05
BUSACK, DANIEL
2,373.74
dd
10/21/05
COFFEY, KEVIN
2,126.75
23
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
24
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
10/21/05
CROTTY, KERRY
2,474.71
dd
10/21/05
DOBLAR, RICHARD
3,409.89
dd
10/21/05
DUNN, ALICE
2,437.38
dd
10/21/05
GABRIEL, ANTHONY
1,932.16
dd
10/21/05
HEINZ, STEPHEN
2,634.72
dd
10/21/05
HILBERT, STEVEN
2,943.81
dd
10/21/05
JOHNSON, KEVIN
3,855.93
dd
10/21/05
KALKA, THOMAS
636.28
dd
10/21/05
KARTS, FLINT
3,494.87
dd
10/21/05
KONG, TOMMY
2,438.02
dd
10/21/05
KROLL, BRETT
2,450.00
dd
10/21/05
KVAM, DAVID
3,420.42
dd
10/21/05
LANGNER, TODD
1,599.34
dd
10/21/05
LARSON, DANIEL
402.57
dd
10/21/05
LU,.IOHNNIE
2,857.12
dd
10/21/05
MARINO,.IASON
2,749.98
dd
10/21/05
MARTIN,.IERROLD
2,532.34
dd
10/21/05
MCCARTY, GLEN
2,043.10
dd
10/21/05
METRY, ALESIA
2,539.04
dd
10/21/05
NYE, MICHAEL
1,857.32
dd
10/21/05
OLSON,.IULIE
2,645.16
dd
10/21/05
RABBETT, KEVIN
3,483.05
dd
10/21/05
RHUDE, MATTHEW
1,613.91
dd
10/21/05
STEFFEN, SCOTT
3,057.80
dd
10/21/05
STEINER,.IOSEPH
666.68
dd
10/21/05
SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM
1,599.34
dd
10/21/05
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS
3,689.00
dd
10/21/05
WENZEL,.IAY
2,385.12
dd
10/21/05
XIONG, KAO
2,285.15
dd
10/21/05
BARTZ, PAUL
3,310.64
dd
10/21/05
BERGERON,.IOSEPH
3,504.51
dd
10/21/05
DUGAS, MICHAEL
3,132.95
dd
10/21/05
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA
2,529.24
dd
10/21/05
FLOR, TIMOTHY
3,469.39
dd
10/21/05
FRASER,.IOHN
2,703.11
dd
10/21/05
LANGNER, SCOTT
2,154.04
dd
10/21/05
PALMA, STEVEN
2,934.24
dd
10/21/05
THEISEN, PAUL
2,312.14
dd
10/21/05
THIENES, PAUL
2,623.21
dd
10/21/05
BECK, PATRICK
1,020.55
dd
10/21/05
BECK, YANCEY
653.04
dd
10/21/05
BECKER, SHANE
1,534.87
dd
10/21/05
CARLSON, BRIAN
1,872.62
dd
10/21/05
DAWSON, RICHARD
2,161.23
dd
10/21/05
DUELLMAN, KIRK
2,054.93
dd
10/21/05
EVERSON,PAUL
2,542.08
24
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
25
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
10/21/05
FITZGERALD, EDWARD
1,035.85
dd
10/21/05
GARZA, BRANDON
785.18
dd
10/21/05
G.IERTSON, MARK
20.44
dd
10/21/05
GOODWIN,.IEFFREY
147.52
dd
10/21/05
HALWEG,.IODI
1,974.37
dd
10/21/05
HEFFERNAN, PATRICK
2,126.83
dd
10/21/05
HEMQUIST, MICHAEL
1,746.13
dd
10/21/05
H.IELLE, ERIK
1,387.65
dd
10/21/05
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
2,094.12
dd
10/21/05
KNAPP, BRETT
1,792.42
dd
10/21/05
LAW, ROBERT
673.84
dd
10/21/05
MYERS, TODD
1,974.37
dd
10/21/05
NOVAK,.IEROME
2,202.40
dd
10/21/05
NOWICKI, PAUL
2,266.17
dd
10/21/05
OPHEIM,.IOHN
2,046.76
dd
10/21/05
PARSONS, KURT
2,631.89
dd
10/21/05
PETERSON, MARK
892.12
dd
10/21/05
PETERSON, ROBERT
2,261.07
dd
10/21/05
PILLAR, MICHAEL
369.00
dd
10/21/05
PRECHTEL, ROBERT
2,309.68
dd
10/21/05
REYNOSO, ANGEL
919.08
dd
10/21/05
RIEMENSCHNEIDER, RONALD
1,270.67
dd
10/21/05
SCHOLEN, CHRISTOPHER
1,050.50
dd
10/21/05
STANWAY, ROBERT
523.40
dd
10/21/05
SVENDSEN, RONALD
2,446.90
dd
10/21/05
SWARD, WILLIAM
597.16
dd
10/21/05
WATERS,.IOSEPH
2,655.39
dd
10/21/05
WEIDELL, CLIFFORD
394.76
dd
10/21/05
WHELEHAN,ROBERT
1,496.15
dd
10/21/05
GERVAIS -.IR, CLARENCE
2,785.12
dd
10/21/05
BAUER, MICHELLE
1,688.19
dd
10/21/05
FLAUGHER,.IAYME
1,946.70
dd
10/21/05
HERMANSON, CHAD
1,579.41
dd
10/21/05
HUBIN, KENNARD
1,828.25
dd
10/21/05
KNAPP, BRETT
1,699.90
dd
10/21/05
LINN, BRYAN
1,895.20
dd
10/21/05
PACOLT, MARSHA
2,456.34
dd
10/21/05
RABINE,.IANET
1,862.95
dd
10/21/05
STAHNKE,.IULIE
1,876.75
dd
10/21/05
LUKIN, STEVEN
3,899.17
dd
10/21/05
SVENDSEN, RUSTIN
3,125.43
dd
10/21/05
ZWIEG, SUSAN
1,874.78
dd
10/21/05
DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT
284.84
dd
10/21/05
AHL, R. CHARLES
4,369.68
dd
10/21/05
BREHEIM, ROGER
1,844.37
dd
10/21/05
GROHS,.IUDITH
1,769.08
25
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
M.
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
10/21/05
KONEWKO, DUWAYNE
5,833.57
dd
10/21/05
NIVEN,AMY
1,198.62
dd
10/21/05
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
2,629.38
dd
10/21/05
BRINK, TROY
1,731.89
dd
10/21/05
DEBILZAN, THOMAS
1,839.75
dd
10/21/05
EDGE, DOUGLAS
2,176.05
dd
10/21/05
.ZONES, DONALD
2,176.05
dd
10/21/05
MEYER, GERALD
1,913.79
dd
10/21/05
NAGEL, BRYAN
2,557.89
dd
10/21/05
OSWALD, ERICK
2,365.78
dd
10/21/05
RUNNING, ROBERT
1,812.39
dd
10/21/05
TEVLIN, TODD
2,614.08
dd
10/21/05
DUCHARME,.IOHN
2,345.26
dd
10/21/05
ENGSTROM, ANDREW
1,570.15
dd
10/21/05
ISAKSON, CHAD
103.95
dd
10/21/05
JACOBSON, SCOTT
1,784.50
dd
10/21/05
KNUTSON, LOIS
1,377.82
dd
10/21/05
LABEREE, ERIN
3,051.56
dd
10/21/05
LINDBLOM, RANDAL
2,689.82
dd
10/21/05
PECK, DENNIS
2,352.19
dd
10/21/05
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
2,347.57
dd
10/21/05
VERMEERSCH, CHARLES
2,231.75
dd
10/21/05
ANDERSON, BRUCE
4,062.32
dd
10/21/05
CAREY, HEIDI
2,070.15
dd
10/21/05
HALL, KATHLEEN
1,766.77
dd
10/21/05
LUND, ERIC
300.00
dd
10/21/05
MARUSKA, MARK
2,674.70
dd
10/21/05
NAUGHTON,.IOHN
1,719.75
dd
10/21/05
SCHINDELDECKER,.IAMES
1,842.06
dd
10/21/05
BIESANZ, OAKLEY
1,545.26
dd
10/21/05
HAYMAN,.IANET
996.65
dd
10/21/05
HUTCHINSON, ANN
2,262.70
dd
10/21/05
NELSON,.IEAN
1,069.27
dd
10/21/05
SEEGER, GERALD
590.89
dd
10/21/05
GAYNOR,VIRGINIA
1,975.75
dd
10/21/05
EKSTRAND, THOMAS
3,043.04
dd
10/21/05
KROLL, LISA
1,219.00
dd
10/21/05
LIVINGSTON,.IOYCE
979.01
dd
10/21/05
SINDT, ANDREA
1,647.75
dd
10/21/05
THOMPSON, DEBRA
651.74
dd
10/21/05
YOUNG, TAMELA
1,531.75
dd
10/21/05
FINWALL, SHANN
2,208.00
dd
10/21/05
ROBERTS, KENNETH
2,503.60
dd
10/21/05
CARVER, NICHOLAS
2,770.29
dd
10/21/05
FISHER, DAVID
3,276.22
dd
10/21/05
RICE, MICHAEL
1,954.95
M.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
27
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
10/21/05
SWAN, DAVID
2,050.95
dd
10/21/05
SWETT, PAUL
1,267.50
dd
10/21/05
WORK, ALICIA
178.50
dd
10/21/05
WORK, ALICIA
237.50
dd
10/21/05
FINN, GREGORY
2,213.26
dd
10/21/05
FRANK, PETER
500.00
dd
10/21/05
GALLANT, CHARLENE
176.00
dd
10/21/05
GALLANT, CHARLENE
198.00
dd
10/21/05
GRAF, MICHAEL
1,941.83
dd
10/21/05
KELLY, LISA
1,320.98
dd
10/21/05
LUSHANKO, ADAM
45.00
dd
10/21/05
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
318.75
dd
10/21/05
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
312.38
dd
10/21/05
ROBBINS, AUDRA
2,116.03
dd
10/21/05
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
375.00
dd
10/21/05
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
229.50
dd
10/21/05
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS
2,854.34
dd
10/21/05
UNDERHILL, KRISTEN
300.00
dd
10/21/05
UNDERHILL, KRISTEN
290.00
dd
10/21/05
GERMAIN, DAVID
1,848.99
dd
10/21/05
NORDQUIST, RICHARD
1,875.54
dd
10/21/05
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
2,175.89
dd
10/21/05
ANZALDI, MANDY
1,236.32
dd
10/21/05
COLEMAN, PHILIP
250.00
dd
10/21/05
COLLINS, ASHLEY
128.00
dd
10/21/05
CRAWFORD -.IR, RAYMOND
320.00
dd
10/21/05
CROSSON, LINDA
2,610.43
dd
10/21/05
EVANS, CHRISTINE
740.74
dd
10/21/05
HOFMEISTER, MARY
737.54
dd
10/21/05
PEL000IN, PENNYE
499.62
dd
10/21/05
SCHMIDT, RUSSELL
2,026.22
dd
10/21/05
SCHULZE, BRIAN
681.98
dd
10/21/05
STAPLES, PAULINE
2,968.83
dd
10/21/05
ZIELINSKEJUDY
46.25
dd
10/21/05
ABRAHAMSON, DANIEL
111.75
dd
10/21/05
ANDREA,.IOHANNA
48.94
dd
10/21/05
BENDTSEN, LISA
69.65
dd
10/21/05
BRENEMAN, NEIL
359.95
dd
10/21/05
BUCKLEY, BRITTANY
35.75
dd
10/21/05
DUNN, RYAN
660.75
dd
10/21/05
ERICKSON- CLARK, CAROL
90.40
dd
10/21/05
ESTRADA, KIEL
96.00
dd
10/21/05
EVANS, KRISTIN
105.00
dd
10/21/05
FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA
59.50
dd
10/21/05
FONTAINE, KIM
813.83
dd
10/21/05
HORWATH, RONALD
1,996.55
27
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK 4
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
10/21/05
KERSCHNER,.IOLENE
577.95
dd
10/21/05
KOEHNEN, AMY
100.20
dd
10/21/05
KOEHNEN, MARY
1,366.64
dd
10/21/05
KRONHOLM, KATHRYN
446.99
dd
10/21/05
MATHEWS, LEAH
59.50
dd
10/21/05
NELSON, SIERRA
136.00
dd
10/21/05
OVERBY,ANNA
80.00
dd
10/21/05
PROESCH, ANDY
471.78
dd
10/21/05
SCHULTZ, MATTHEW
22.75
dd
10/21/05
SMITH, ANN
168.75
dd
10/21/05
TRUE, CAROLINE
52.80
dd
10/21/05
TUPY, HEIDE
161.60
dd
10/21/05
TUPY, MARCUS
241.50
dd
10/21/05
WERNER, REBECCA
63.00
dd
10/21/05
GROPPOLI, LINDA
319.20
dd
10/21/05
BEHAN,.IAMES
1,718.61
dd
10/21/05
LONETTEJAMES
1,046.82
dd
10/21/05
PATTERSON,ALBERT
1,085.24
dd
10/21/05
PRINS, KELLY
988.62
dd
10/21/05
REILLY, MICHAEL
1,626.95
dd
10/21/05
SCHOENECKER, LEIGH
161.93
dd
10/21/05
AICHELE, CRAIG
1,885.36
dd
10/21/05
PRIEM, STEVEN
2,126.26
dd
10/21/05
WOEHRLE, MATTHEW
1,557.35
dd
10/21/05
BERGO, CHAD
2,276.71
dd
10/21/05
FOWLDS, MYCHAL
2,085.54
dd
10/21/05
FRANZEN, NICHOLAS
1,757.69
dd
10/21/05
HURLEY, STEPHEN
3,276.22
wf
2039
10110105
FARLEY,.IAMIE
510.00
wf
102818
10/21/05
JAHN, DAVID
1,592.46
wf
102819
10/21/05
MORIN,TROY
153.00
wf
102820
10/21/05
MORSON,.IOHN
396.00
wf
102821
10/21/05
MATHEYS, ALANA
1,999.02
wf
102822
10/21/05
HANSEN, LORI
1,869.94
wf
102823
10/21/05
PALANK, MARY
1,631.66
wf
102824
10/21/05
SVENDSEN,.IOANNE
2,049.25
wf
102825
10/21/05
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
3,839.83
wf
102826
10/21/05
WELCHLIN, CABOT
2,418.62
wf
102827
10/21/05
ACOSTA, MARK
1,074.65
wf
102828
10/21/05
AMBORN,.IASON
1,117.17
wf
102829
10/21/05
ANDERSON, BRIAN
1,781.12
wf
102830
10/21/05
BAHL, DAVID
1,331.65
wf
102831
10/21/05
BAUMAN,ANDREW
872.97
wf
102832
10/21/05
BOURQUIN, RON
1,461.11
wf
102833
10/21/05
BUCHE,.IOETTE
2,075.54
wf
102834
10/21/05
CAPISTRANT,.IOHN
820.52
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
9
CHECK
4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
102835
10/21/05
CARLSON, CAMERON
507.20
wf
102836
10/21/05
CAVE, GEORGE
650.81
wf
102837
10/21/05
CHRISTENSEN, CHARLES
3.08
wf
102838
10/21/05
CRAWLEY, BRIAN
16.52
wf
102839
10/21/05
CROMETT, MARK
1,354.43
wf
102840
10/21/05
DIETZ, EDWARD
883.90
wf
102841
10/21/05
DITTEL, MICHAEL
1,390.63
wf
102842
10/21/05
DUELLMAN, AMY
1,068.77
wf
102843
10/21/05
DUELLMAN,.IOSEPH
333.00
wf
102844
10/21/05
FASULO, WALTER
1,151.41
wf
102845
10/21/05
FETTERS,.IEFFREY
16.24
wf
102846
10/21/05
GERARD,.IAMIE
1,995.99
wf
102847
10/21/05
HAKSETH, NATHAN
1,382.13
wf
102848
10/21/05
HALE,.IOSEPH
1,229.51
wf
102849
10/21/05
HERLUND, RICK
1,615.20
wf
102850
10/21/05
HUTCHINSON,.IAMES
1,067.02
wf
102851
10/21/05
KALKA, THOMAS
1,894.03
wf
102852
10/21/05
KANE, ROBERT
2,622.72
wf
102853
10/21/05
KARNOWSKI, SANDRA
2,848.96
wf
102854
10/21/05
KOEHN, CORY
564.50
wf
102855
10/21/05
KONDER, RONALD
1,116.57
wf
102856
10/21/05
KORTUS, WILLIAM
990.56
wf
102857
10/21/05
LIDBERG, MICHAEL
1,296.28
wf
102858
10/21/05
LINN, BRYAN
10.08
wf
102859
10/21/05
LOCHEN, MICHAEL
1,942.50
wf
102860
10/21/05
MALLORY, GORDON
1,906.61
wf
102861
10/21/05
MARTY, MARK
4,218.41
wf
102862
10/21/05
MATTS,.IEREMY
4.20
wf
102863
10/21/05
MCGOVERN,.IOHN
1,046.56
wf
102864
10/21/05
MELANDER,.ION
2,125.55
wf
102865
10/21/05
MELLEN, RICHARD
1,615.51
wf
102866
10/21/05
MILLER, NICHOLAS
967.20
wf
102867
10/21/05
MONK,.IOHN
356.25
wf
102868
10/21/05
NALIPINSKI, STEPHEN
1,004.40
wf
102869
10/21/05
NOLAN, PAUL
1,480.75
wf
102870
10/21/05
QUIST,.IESSE
3.36
wf
102871
10/21/05
RAVENWALD, CORINNE
1,470.32
wf
102872
10/21/05
RICE, DANIEL
1,292.71
wf
102873
10/21/05
RIDER,.IEFFREY
1,485.08
wf
102874
10/21/05
ROBERTSON, STEVEN
773.92
wf
102875
10/21/05
ROMANIK,.IAMES
1,766.02
wf
102876
10/21/05
SACKETT,.IAMES
899.98
wf
102877
10/21/05
SCHADT,.IEFFREY
772.92
wf
102878
10/21/05
SCHULTZ, THOMAS
378.39
wf
102879
10/21/05
SEDLACEK,.IEFFREY
7.70
wf
102880
10/21/05
SINGER, SCOTT
4.62
9
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
Z
CHECK
4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
102881
10/21/05
SKOK, STEPHEN
1,206.07
wf
102882
10/21/05
SMITH, RICHARD
561.64
wf
102883
10/21/05
SOLHEID, DALE
801.68
wf
102884
10/21/05
STELLA,.IAMES
1,279.95
wf
102885
10/21/05
STENE, MARK
1,025.83
wf
102886
10/21/05
WHITE,.IOEL
979.59
wf
102887
10/21/05
FREBERG, RONALD
1,912.10
wf
102888
10/21/05
.IAROSCH,.IONATHAN
408.00
wf
102889
10/21/05
EDSON,DAVID
1,878.96
wf
102890
10/21/05
HELEY, ROLAND
1,877.88
wf
102891
10/21/05
HINNENKAMP, GARY
1,852.71
wf
102892
10/21/05
LINDORFF, DENNIS
1,844.37
wf
102893
10/21/05
NOVAK, MICHAEL
1,804.55
wf
102894
10/21/05
BERGREN, KIRSTEN
146.25
wf
102895
10/21/05
GERNES, CAROLE
272.50
wf
102896
10/21/05
SOUTTER, CHRISTINE
685.94
wf
102897
10/21/05
DANNER, BRENDA
384.76
wf
102898
10/21/05
ALMQUIST, DEANNA
96.00
wf
102899
10/21/05
BAKER, BRITTANY
48.00
wf
102900
10/21/05
BERGER, STEPHANIE
142.00
wf
102900
10/21/05
BERGER, STEPHANIE
176.00
wf
102901
10/21/05
ERICKSON, AMY
96.00
wf
102901
10/21/05
ERICKSON, AMY
72.00
wf
102902
10/21/05
FRANK, STEVE
280.00
wf
102903
10/21/05
GREER, ABIGAIL
60.00
wf
102903
10/21/05
GREER, ABIGAIL
48.00
wf
102904
10/21/05
HANSEN, ALEXANDER
13.00
wf
102905
10/21/05
HOBBS, KENDRA
72.00
wf
102906
10/21/05
JOHNSON, ALEXANDER
39.00
wf
102907
10/21/05
KLEM,.IOSH
20.00
wf
102908
10/21/05
KOHLMAN,.IENNIFER
51.20
wf
102908
10/21/05
KOHLMAN,.IENNIFER
76.80
wf
102909
10/21/05
KYRK, HALEY
102.00
wf
102910
10/21/05
LANG, THOMAS
60.00
wf
102911
10/21/05
LIUKONEN, MATTHEW
37.50
wf
102912
10/21/05
LO, CHUEPHENG
120.00
wf
102913
10/21/05
MERRITT, MICHAEL
33.00
wf
102914
10/21/05
NYBERG, MICHELLE
156.00
wf
102915
10/21/05
OLSON, KRISTIN
48.00
wf
102915
10/21/05
OLSON, KRISTIN
36.00
wf
102916
10/21/05
PREW, WILLIAM
108.00
wf
102917
10/21/05
SHOBERG, KART
76.31
wf
102917
10/21/05
SHOBERG, KART
55.69
wf
102918
10/21/05
HAAG, MARK
1,882.25
wf
102919
10/21/05
NADEAU, EDWARD
2,972.99
wf
102920
10/21/05
GLASS,.IEAN
1,814.45
Z
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
31
CHECK 4
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
102921
10/21/05
HER, CHONG
385.00
wf
102922
10/21/05
NAGEL, BROOKE
213.68
wf
102923
10/21/05
TOLBERT, FRANCINE
250.00
wf
102924
10/21/05
ANDERSON, CALEB
9.50
wf
102925
10/21/05
ANDERSON,.IOSHUA
97.50
wf
102926
10/21/05
ANDERSON,.IUSTIN
97.50
wf
102927
10/21/05
ANDERSON, RYAN
32.50
wf
102928
10/21/05
ARNEVIK, ERICA
35.00
wf
102929
10/21/05
BOTHWELL, ERINN
62.70
wf
102930
10/21/05
BOTHWELL, KRISTIN
137.48
wf
102931
10/21/05
BRENEMAN, SEAN
156.40
wf
102932
10/21/05
BRUSOE, CRISTINA
84.50
wf
102933
10/21/05
CLARK, PAMELA
68.00
wf
102934
10/21/05
COSTA,.IOSEPH
365.63
wf
102935
10/21/05
DEMPSEY, BETH
116.50
wf
102936
10/21/05
FENGER,.IUSTIN
237.15
wf
102937
10/21/05
GRANT, MELISSA
32.70
wf
102938
10/21/05
GRUEN IAGEN, LINDA
600.75
wf
102939
10/21/05
HAGSTROM, EMILY
125.50
wf
102940
10/21/05
HEINN, REBECCA
96.00
wf
102941
10/21/05
LEMAY, KATHERINE
79.31
wf
102942
10/21/05
LUTZ, CHRISTINA
160.38
wf
102943
10/21/05
MCCANN, NATALIE
103.00
wf
102944
10/21/05
MELLEN, CHRISTOPHER
23.63
wf
102945
10/21/05
MORIS, RACHEL
23.63
wf
102946
10/21/05
NWANOKWALE, MORDY
100.75
wf
102947
10/21/05
PETERSON, ANNA
51.00
wf
102948
10/21/05
RICHTER, NANCY
136.00
wf
102949
10/21/05
ROSTRON, ROBERT
37.38
wf
102950
10/21/05
RYDEEN, ARIEL
158.40
wf
102951
10/21/05
SCHMIDT, EMILY
108.13
wf
102952
10/21/05
SCHOENECKER, SAMANTHA
54.40
wf
102953
10/21/05
SCHOMMER, SUMMERS
68.75
wf
102954
10/21/05
SCHRAMM, BRITTANY
85.00
wf
102955
10/21/05
SCHREINER, MICHELLE
207.10
wf
102956
10/21/05
SMITLEY, SHARON
383.20
wf
102957
10/21/05
STAHNKE, AMY
210.35
wf
102958
10/21/05
WARNER, CAROLYN
191.60
wf
102959
10/21/05
WEDES, CARYL
140.10
wf
102960
10/21/05
WELTER, ELIZABETH
154.00
wf
102961
10/21/05
WHITE, NICOLE
814.77
wf
102962
10/21/05
WILLIAMS, KRISTINE
86.13
wf
102963
10/21/05
WOLFGRAM, MARY
65.00
wf
102964
10/21/05
WOODMAN, ALICE
207.20
wf
102965
10/21/05
BOSLEY, CAROL
294.30
wf
102966
10/21/05
LEWIS, AMY
115.50
31
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK 4
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
102967
10/21/05
OIL, REBECCA
38.59
wf
102968
10/21/05
PARAYNO, GUAI
238.03
wf
102969
10/21/05
SATTLER, MELINDA
89.10
wf
102970
10/21/05
VAN HALE, PAULA
167.70
wf
102971
10/21/05
ANDERSON, MATT
113.05
wf
102972
10/21/05
BALDWIN,.IANA
63.30
wf
102973
10/21/05
BERLIN, SARAH
101.60
wf
102974
10/21/05
BIRKHOLZ, TYLER
120.65
wf
102975
10/21/05
BOYD, DANIEL
44.45
wf
102976
10/21/05
DOUGLASS, TOM
1,269.17
wf
102977
10/21/05
GADOW, ANNA
50.80
wf
102978
10/21/05
HER, PHENG
200.45
wf
102979
10/21/05
O'GRADY, VICTORIA
90.35
wf
102980
10/21/05
SIMPSON,.IOSEPH
103.60
wf
102981
10/21/05
SIMPSON, KIMBERLYN
132.05
wf
102982
10/21/05
THEESFELD, CALEB
83.40
wf
102983
10/21/05
YANG, HUE
25.40
wf
102984
10/21/05
YANG, KAY
118.15
wf
102985
10/21/05
YANG, TIM
56.53
wf
102986
10/21/05
VUE, FOR PAO
200.03
554,101.37
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
33
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
11/04/05
CARDINAL, ROBERT
422.42
dd
11/04/05
.IUENEMANN, KATHLEEN
371.77
dd
11/04/05
KOPPEN, MARVIN
371.77
dd
11/04/05
ROSSBACH, WILLIAM
371.77
dd
11/04/05
COLEMAN, MELINDA
4,271.10
dd
11/04/05
DARST, ROBERTA
1,729.33
dd
11/04/05
FURSMAN, RICHARD
5,053.62
dd
11/04/05
FARR, LARRY
1,767.48
dd
11/04/05
SWANSON, LYLE
1,662.77
dd
11/04/05
LE,.IENNIFER
175.50
dd
11/04/05
LE, SHERYL
4,126.34
dd
11/04/05
MORSON,.IOHN
704.00
dd
11/04/05
RAMEAUX, THERESE
2,549.46
dd
11/04/05
FAUST, DANIEL
4,291.97
dd
11/04/05
SCHMIDT, DEBORAH
1,456.56
dd
11/04/05
ANDERSON, CAROLE
219.05
dd
11/04/05
BAUMAN, GAYLE
3,434.43
dd
11/04/05
JACKSON, MARY
1,819.77
dd
11/04/05
KELSEY, CONNIE
805.43
dd
11/04/05
TETZLAFF,.IUDY
1,819.78
dd
11/04/05
FRY, PATRICIA
1,689.36
dd
11/04/05
GUILFOILE, KAREN
3,008.18
dd
11/04/05
OSTER, ANDREA
1,764.46
dd
11/04/05
CARLE,.IEANETTE
1,685.93
dd
11/04/05
.IAGOE, CAROL
1,631.66
dd
11/04/05
JOHNSON, BONNIE
1,039.46
dd
11/04/05
MECHELKE, SHERRIE
1,068.33
dd
11/04/05
MOY, PAMELA
795.98
dd
11/04/05
OLSON, SANDRA
1,167.02
dd
11/04/05
WEAVER, KRISTINE
1,787.76
dd
11/04/05
BANICK,.IOHN
3,871.15
dd
11/04/05
CORCORAN, THERESA
1,629.35
dd
11/04/05
POWELL, PHILIP
2,267.65
dd
11/04/05
RICHIE, CAROLE
1,680.82
dd
11/04/05
SPANGLER, EDNA
308.00
dd
11/04/05
THOMALLA, DAVID
4,287.27
dd
11/04/05
ABEL, CLINT
2,406.51
dd
11/04/05
ALDRIDGE, MARK
2,833.88
dd
11/04/05
ANDREWS, SCOTT
3,335.21
dd
11/04/05
BAKKE, LONN
2,566.24
dd
11/04/05
BELDE, STANLEY
2,703.53
dd
11/04/05
BIERDEMAN, BRIAN
2,573.71
dd
11/04/05
BOHL,.IOHN
2,690.69
dd
11/04/05
BUSACK, DANIEL
2,416.60
33
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
34
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
11/04/05
COFFEY, KEVIN
2,089.31
dd
11/04/05
CROTTY, KERRY
2,474.71
dd
11/04/05
DOBLAR, RICHARD
3,348.54
dd
11/04/05
DUNN, ALICE
2,808.66
dd
11/04/05
GABRIEL, ANTHONY
2,498.08
dd
11/04/05
HEINZ, STEPHEN
3,088.17
dd
11/04/05
HILBERT, STEVEN
2,855.72
dd
11/04/05
JOHNSON, KEVIN
3,052.66
dd
11/04/05
KALKA, THOMAS
636.28
dd
11/04/05
KARTS, FLINT
3,468.60
dd
11/04/05
KONG, TOMMY
2,298.74
dd
11/04/05
KROLL, BRETT
2,503.57
dd
11/04/05
KVAM, DAVID
3,420.42
dd
11/04/05
LANGNER, TODD
1,599.34
dd
11/04/05
LARSON, DANIEL
402.57
dd
11/04/05
LU,.IOHNNIE
2,767.84
dd
11/04/05
MARINO,.IASON
2,482.14
dd
11/04/05
MARTIN,.IERROLD
2,442.49
dd
11/04/05
MCCARTY, GLEN
2,043.10
dd
11/04/05
METRY, ALESIA
2,580.65
dd
11/04/05
NYE, MICHAEL
1,921.19
dd
11/04/05
OLSON,.IULIE
2,470.16
dd
11/04/05
RABBETT, KEVIN
3,483.05
dd
11/04/05
RHUDE, MATTHEW
1,715.86
dd
11/04/05
STEFFEN, SCOTT
3,111.03
dd
11/04/05
STEINER,.IOSEPH
666.68
dd
11/04/05
SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM
1,599.34
dd
11/04/05
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS
2,532.70
dd
11/04/05
WENZEL,.IAY
2,706.53
dd
11/04/05
XIONG, KAO
2,347.56
dd
11/04/05
BARTZ, PAUL
2,807.23
dd
11/04/05
BERGERON,.IOSEPH
3,307.03
dd
11/04/05
DUGAS, MICHAEL
2,980.07
dd
11/04/05
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA
2,529.24
dd
11/04/05
FLOR, TIMOTHY
2,775.99
dd
11/04/05
FRASER,.IOHN
2,946.48
dd
11/04/05
LANGNER, SCOTT
2,154.04
dd
11/04/05
PALMA, STEVEN
2,715.20
dd
11/04/05
THEISEN, PAUL
2,154.04
dd
11/04/05
THIENES, PAUL
2,540.94
dd
11/04/05
CARLSON, BRIAN
1,943.85
dd
11/04/05
DAWSON, RICHARD
2,233.04
dd
11/04/05
DUELLMAN, KIRK
2,111.05
dd
11/04/05
EVERSON,PAUL
2,190.98
dd
11/04/05
HALWEG,.IODI
1,898.06
dd
11/04/05
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
2,105.12
34
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
35
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
11/04/05
MYERS, TODD
2,096.49
dd
11/04/05
NOVAK,.IEROME
2,276.65
dd
11/04/05
PARSONS, KURT
2,158.31
dd
11/04/05
PETERSON, ROBERT
2,329.30
dd
11/04/05
PRECHTEL, ROBERT
2,998.25
dd
11/04/05
SVENDSEN, RONALD
2,394.70
dd
11/04/05
GERVAIS -.IR, CLARENCE
2,785.12
dd
11/04/05
BAUER, MICHELLE
1,939.08
dd
11/04/05
FLAUGHER,.IAYME
1,964.79
dd
11/04/05
HERMANSON, CHAD
1,665.66
dd
11/04/05
HUBIN, KENNARD
1,614.95
dd
11/04/05
KNAPP, BRETT
1,558.15
dd
11/04/05
LINN, BRYAN
1,895.20
dd
11/04/05
PACOLT, MARSHA
2,456.34
dd
11/04/05
RABINE,.IANET
1,862.95
dd
11/04/05
SCHAULS, ADAM
136.50
dd
11/04/05
STAHNKE,.IULIE
1,877.35
dd
11/04/05
LUKIN, STEVEN
3,899.17
dd
11/04/05
SVENDSEN, RUSTIN
3,125.43
dd
11/04/05
ZWIEG, SUSAN
1,762.15
dd
11/04/05
DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT
284.84
dd
11/04/05
AHL, R. CHARLES
4,544.72
dd
11/04/05
BREHEIM, ROGER
1,844.37
dd
11/04/05
GROHS,.IUDITH
1,769.08
dd
11/04/05
KONEWKO, DUWAYNE
2,970.52
dd
11/04/05
NIVEN,AMY
1,208.32
dd
11/04/05
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
2,629.38
dd
11/04/05
BRINK, TROY
1,670.95
dd
11/04/05
DEBILZAN, THOMAS
1,839.75
dd
11/04/05
EDGE, DOUGLAS
1,863.75
dd
11/04/05
.ZONES, DONALD
1,855.75
dd
11/04/05
MEYER, GERALD
1,913.79
dd
11/04/05
NAGEL, BRYAN
2,298.96
dd
11/04/05
OSWALD, ERICK
2,133.36
dd
11/04/05
RUNNING, ROBERT
1,748.55
dd
11/04/05
TEVLIN, TODD
1,729.75
dd
11/04/05
DUCHARME,.IOHN
2,345.27
dd
11/04/05
ENGSTROM, ANDREW
1,608.15
dd
11/04/05
ISAKSON, CHAD
196.35
dd
11/04/05
JACOBSON, SCOTT
1,698.77
dd
11/04/05
KNUTSON, LOIS
1,377.82
dd
11/04/05
LABEREE, ERIN
2,798.30
dd
11/04/05
LINDBLOM, RANDAL
2,625.22
dd
11/04/05
PECK, DENNIS
2,352.19
dd
11/04/05
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
2,347.57
dd
11/04/05
VERMEERSCH, CHARLES
2,231.75
35
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
Z
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
11/04/05
ANDERSON, BRUCE
4,237.32
dd
11/04/05
CAREY, HEIDI
2,070.15
dd
11/04/05
HALL, KATHLEEN
1,766.77
dd
11/04/05
LUND, ERIC
252.00
dd
11/04/05
MARUSKA, MARK
2,674.70
dd
11/04/05
NAUGHTON,.IOHN
1,719.75
dd
11/04/05
SCHINDELDECKER,.IAMES
1,842.06
dd
11/04/05
BIESANZ, OAKLEY
1,545.26
dd
11/04/05
HAYMAN,.IANET
1,406.69
dd
11/04/05
HUTCHINSON, ANN
2,262.70
dd
11/04/05
NELSON,.IEAN
1,128.64
dd
11/04/05
SEEGER, GERALD
624.63
dd
11/04/05
GAYNOR,VIRGINIA
2,023.99
dd
11/04/05
EKSTRAND, THOMAS
3,043.04
dd
11/04/05
KROLL, LISA
1,228.24
dd
11/04/05
LIVINGSTON,.IOYCE
979.01
dd
11/04/05
SINDT, ANDREA
1,647.75
dd
11/04/05
THOMPSON, DEBRA
815.01
dd
11/04/05
YOUNG, TAMELA
1,523.75
dd
11/04/05
FINWALL, SHANN
2,208.00
dd
11/04/05
ROBERTS, KENNETH
2,525.79
dd
11/04/05
CARVER, NICHOLAS
2,770.29
dd
11/04/05
FISHER, DAVID
3,276.22
dd
11/04/05
RICE, MICHAEL
1,954.95
dd
11/04/05
SWAN, DAVID
2,050.95
dd
11/04/05
SWETT, PAUL
504.00
dd
11/04/05
WORK, ALICIA
218.89
dd
11/04/05
FINN, GREGORY
2,213.26
dd
11/04/05
FRANK, PETER
250.00
dd
11/04/05
GALLANT, CHARLENE
210.00
dd
11/04/05
GRAF, MICHAEL
1,941.83
dd
11/04/05
KELLY, LISA
1,316.03
dd
11/04/05
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
318.76
dd
11/04/05
ROBBINS, AUDRA
2,116.03
dd
11/04/05
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
317.25
dd
11/04/05
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS
2,854.34
dd
11/04/05
UNDERHILL, KRISTEN
238.00
dd
11/04/05
GERMAIN, DAVID
1,848.99
dd
11/04/05
NORDQUIST, RICHARD
1,839.75
dd
11/04/05
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
2,127.93
dd
11/04/05
ANZALDI, MANDY
1,356.34
dd
11/04/05
COLEMAN, PHILIP
245.00
dd
11/04/05
COLLINS, ASHLEY
124.00
dd
11/04/05
CRAWFORD -.IR, RAYMOND
103.00
dd
11/04/05
CROSSON, LINDA
2,610.43
dd
11/04/05
EVANS, CHRISTINE
662.90
Z
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
37
CHECK 4 CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
11/04/05
HOFMEISTER, MARY
711.27
dd
11/04/05
PEL000IN, PENNYE
416.74
dd
11/04/05
SCHMIDT, RUSSELL
2,026.22
dd
11/04/05
SCHULZE, BRIAN
717.52
dd
11/04/05
STAPLES, PAULINE
2,940.03
dd
11/04/05
ZIELINSKEJUDY
55.50
dd
11/04/05
BENDTSEN, LISA
69.65
dd
11/04/05
BRENEMAN, NEIL
422.14
dd
11/04/05
BRUSOE, CRISTINA
97.50
dd
11/04/05
BUCKLEY, BRITTANY
68.25
dd
11/04/05
DUNN, RYAN
759.15
dd
11/04/05
ERICKSON- CLARK, CAROL
90.40
dd
11/04/05
EVANS, KRISTIN
105.00
dd
11/04/05
FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA
83.30
dd
11/04/05
FONTAINE, KIM
806.54
dd
11/04/05
HORWATH, RONALD
1,996.55
dd
11/04/05
KERSCHNER,.IOLENE
533.60
dd
11/04/05
KOEHNEN, AMY
75.15
dd
11/04/05
KOEHNEN, MARY
1,374.87
dd
11/04/05
KRONHOLM, KATHRYN
510.83
dd
11/04/05
MATHEWS, LEAH
45.50
dd
11/04/05
NELSON, SIERRA
155.50
dd
11/04/05
OVERBY,ANNA
60.00
dd
11/04/05
PROESCH, ANDY
324.04
dd
11/04/05
SCHULTZ, MATTHEW
45.50
dd
11/04/05
SMITH, ANN
285.94
dd
11/04/05
TRUE, CAROLINE
39.60
dd
11/04/05
TUPY, HEIDE
101.00
dd
11/04/05
TUPY, MARCUS
215.25
dd
11/04/05
WERNER, REBECCA
63.00
dd
11/04/05
GROPPOLI, LINDA
331.20
dd
11/04/05
BEHAN,.IAMES
1,718.62
dd
11/04/05
LONETTEJAMES
1,046.82
dd
11/04/05
PATTERSON,ALBERT
1,085.24
dd
11/04/05
PRINS, KELLY
988.62
dd
11/04/05
REILLY, MICHAEL
1,626.95
dd
11/04/05
SCHOENECKER, LEIGH
163.51
dd
11/04/05
AICHELE, CRAIG
1,909.11
dd
11/04/05
PRIEM, STEVEN
2,069.35
dd
11/04/05
WOEHRLE, MATTHEW
1,559.51
dd
11/04/05
BERGO, CHAD
2,276.71
dd
11/04/05
FOWLDS, MYCHAL
2,085.54
dd
11/04/05
FRANZEN, NICHOLAS
1,932.95
dd
11/04/05
HURLEY, STEPHEN
3,401.22
wf
103002 11/04/05
WORKMAN, ROBERT
50.00
wf
103003 11/04/05
JAHN, DAVID
1,592.46
37
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
S:
CHECK 4
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
103004
11/04/05
MORIN,TROY
195.50
wf
103005
11/04/05
MATHEYS, ALANA
1,999.02
wf
103006
11/04/05
HANSEN, LORI
1,969.35
wf
103007
11/04/05
PALANK, MARY
1,631.66
wf
103008
11/04/05
SVENDSEN,.IOANNE
2,098.41
wf
103009
11/04/05
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
3,977.05
wf
103010
11/04/05
WELCHLIN, CABOT
2,429.96
wf
103011
11/04/05
BAUMAN,ANDREW
176.00
wf
103012
11/04/05
FREBERG, RONALD
2,111.20
wf
103013
11/04/05
.IAROSCH,.IONATHAN
231.20
wf
103014
11/04/05
EDSON,DAVID
1,877.88
wf
103015
11/04/05
HELEY, ROLAND
1,877.88
wf
103016
11/04/05
HINNENKAMP, GARY
1,861.35
wf
103017
11/04/05
LINDORFF, DENNIS
1,844.37
wf
103018
11/04/05
NOVAK, MICHAEL
1,804.55
wf
103019
11/04/05
BERGREN, KIRSTEN
73.13
wf
103020
11/04/05
GERNES, CAROLE
251.75
wf
103021
11/04/05
SOUTTER, CHRISTINE
541.25
wf
103022
11/04/05
DANNER, BRENDA
523.14
wf
103023
11/04/05
BAKER, BRITTANY
36.00
wf
103024
11/04/05
BERGER, STEPHANIE
188.00
wf
103025
11/04/05
ERICKSON, AMY
36.00
wf
103026
11/04/05
FRANK, STEVE
80.00
wf
103027
11/04/05
GRAF, ASHLEY
102.00
wf
103028
11/04/05
HOBBS, KENDRA
36.00
wf
103029
11/04/05
JOHNSON, ALEXANDER
26.00
wf
103030
11/04/05
KLEM,.IOSH
60.00
wf
103031
11/04/05
KOHLMAN,.IENNIFER
54.00
wf
103032
11/04/05
KYRK, HALEY
66.00
wf
103033
11/04/05
LO, CHUEPHENG
40.00
wf
103034
11/04/05
NYBERG, MICHELLE
48.00
wf
103035
11/04/05
OLSON, KRISTIN
48.00
wf
103036
11/04/05
SHOBERG, KART
162.94
wf
103037
11/04/05
SWANSON, AMANDA
68.00
wf
103038
11/04/05
HAAG, MARK
1,770.15
wf
103039
11/04/05
NADEAU, EDWARD
2,972.99
wf
103040
11/04/05
DREWES, DEENA
48.10
wf
103041
11/04/05
GLASS,.IEAN
1,814.45
wf
103042
11/04/05
HER, CHONG
385.00
wf
103043
11/04/05
NAGEL, BROOKE
350.35
wf
103044
11/04/05
SHEA,.IENNIFER
15.80
wf
103045
11/04/05
TOLBERT, FRANCINE
364.00
wf
103046
11/04/05
ANDERSON, CALEB
19.00
wf
103047
11/04/05
ANDERSON,.IOSHUA
136.89
wf
103048
11/04/05
ANDERSON,.IUSTIN
155.73
wf
103049
11/04/05
ARNEVIK, ERICA
17.50
S:
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
0
CHECK 4
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
103050
11/04/05
BRENEMAN, SEAN
142.00
wf
103051
11/04/05
CLARK, PAMELA
82.00
wf
103052
11/04/05
COSTA,.IOSEPH
201.68
wf
103053
11/04/05
DEMPSEY, BETH
163.10
wf
103054
11/04/05
FENGER,.IUSTIN
280.45
wf
103055
11/04/05
GRANT, MELISSA
327.10
wf
103056
11/04/05
GRUEN IAGEN, LINDA
624.70
wf
103057
11/04/05
HAGSTROM, EMILY
247.63
wf
103058
11/04/05
HEINN, REBECCA
96.00
wf
103059
11/04/05
LEMAY, KATHERINE
119.50
wf
103060
11/04/05
LUTZ, CHRISTINA
141.00
wf
103061
11/04/05
MCCANN, NATALIE
85.50
wf
103062
11/04/05
MELLEN, CHRISTOPHER
23.63
wf
103063
11/04/05
MORIS, RACHEL
60.75
wf
103064
11/04/05
NWANOKWALE, MORDY
133.25
wf
103065
11/04/05
PETERSON, ANNA
79.90
wf
103066
11/04/05
RICHTER, NANCY
51.00
wf
103067
11/04/05
RYDEEN, ARIEL
84.60
wf
103068
11/04/05
SCHMIDT, EMILY
171.93
wf
103069
11/04/05
SCHOMMER, SUMMERS
44.38
wf
103070
11/04/05
SCHRAMM, BRITTANY
72.00
wf
103071
11/04/05
SCHREINER, MICHELLE
198.12
wf
103072
11/04/05
SIMPSON, KIMBERLYN
147.00
wf
103073
11/04/05
SIVALD, SHANNON
36.25
wf
103074
11/04/05
SMITLEY, SHARON
383.20
wf
103075
11/04/05
STAHNKE, AMY
193.30
wf
103076
11/04/05
WARNER, CAROLYN
239.50
wf
103077
11/04/05
WEDES, CARYL
140.10
wf
103078
11/04/05
WELTER, ELIZABETH
151.25
wf
103079
11/04/05
WHITE, NICOLE
759.86
wf
103080
11/04/05
WILLIAMS, KRISTINE
45.50
wf
103081
11/04/05
WOLFGRAM, MARY
120.25
wf
103082
11/04/05
WOODMAN, ALICE
184.80
wf
103083
11/04/05
BOSLEY, CAROL
310.50
wf
103084
11/04/05
BREITBACH, GARY
588.00
wf
103085
11/04/05
LEWIS, AMY
78.75
wf
103086
11/04/05
ODDEN,.IESSICA
9.19
wf
103087
11/04/05
OIL, REBECCA
131.88
wf
103088
11/04/05
PARAYNO, GUAI
261.73
wf
103089
11/04/05
SATTLER, MELINDA
79.20
wf
103090
11/04/05
STODGHILL, AMANDA
230.63
wf
103091
11/04/05
VAN HALE, PAULA
150.15
wf
103092
11/04/05
ANDERSON, MATT
91.44
wf
103093
11/04/05
BALDWIN,.IANA
33.01
wf
103094
11/04/05
BERLIN, SARAH
61.91
wf
103095
11/04/05
BIRKHOLZ, TYLER
61.91
0
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
40
CHECK 4
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
103096
11/04/05
BOYD, DANIEL
30.16
wf
103097
11/04/05
DOUGLASS, TOM
1,149.92
wf
103098
11/04/05
GADOW, ANNA
84.14
wf
103099
11/04/05
HER, PHENG
307.70
wf
103100
11/04/05
O'GRADY, VICTORIA
130.31
wf
103101
11/04/05
OLSON, CHRISTINE
4.99
wf
103102
11/04/05
SIMPSON,.IOSEPH
68.16
wf
103103
11/04/05
THEESFELD, CALEB
33.01
wf
103104
11/04/05
YANG, HUE
93.66
wf
103105
11/04/05
YANG, KAY
123.36
wf
103106
11/04/05
YANG, TIM
189.53
wf
103107
11/04/05
VUE, FOR PAO
58.74
wf
103108
11/04/05
XIONG, HLAO
33.34
450,954.73
40
Agenda G - 2
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cleric
DATE: November 5, 2005
RE: Lawful Gambling Renewal
Bill Larson has applied for the annual renewal premise permit application for lawful
gambling for the North Tartan Area Girls Basketball Booster Club. The Booster Club
continues to hold their gambling at Broadway Bar & Pizza located at 1900 County Road
D East.
For approval to be granted it is requested that the city council approve the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota,
that the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the North Tartan Area Girls
Basketball Booster Club, 2009 East County Road D, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the
timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling
Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit
application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City
Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for
their approval.
Agenda Item G3
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
DuWayne Konewko, Environmental Manager
SUBJECT: Consider Approval of 2006 SCORE Funding Application
DATE: November 2, 2005
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is the 2006 SCORE application. The amount is $67,442. The money is a grant
from the county to repay the city for a portion of the recycling costs. Ramsey County is
requesting that the city council approve the application.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the 2006 SCORE application.
Attachments:
1. 2006 Score Application
SAINT PAUL - RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION
2006 SCORE FUNDING GRANT APPLICATION
CITY /TOWNSHIP Maplewood
CONTACT PERSON DuWayne Konewko
ADDRESS 1902 County Road B East, Maplewood, MN. 55109
PHONE 651.249.2330 FAX 651.249.2409
A. DESCRIPTION OF 2006 RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
1. In 2006, will any collection services be provided under a contract? Yes _X_ No
a. If so, provide contractor(s), address, and contact name. Eureka Recycling - Alex Danovitch -
Director of Business Development, 2828 Kennedy Street NE, Minneapolis, MN. 55413
b. Which type of households are expected to receive service under the contract?
Single - family: _X Duplex: _X_ Triplex: _X_ 4plex: _X_
Townhome: X Condominium: X Manufactured Home Park: X
Multi -unit buildings (up to _all_ units): _X_
c. What is the total number of households expected to receive service under the contract?
Single - family thru 4 -plex: 11,400 - Multi -unit buildings with 5 or more units: 120
buildings - 4,500 households
d. What materials will be collected? List each sorting category for 2006 and materials
collected in that category. (If different materials will be collected or different sorts are
required based on type of housing, please describe differences.) Two sort collection -
Sorting Category #1 - newspaper /junk mail /phone books /magazines /cardboard /office
paper /boxboard. Sorting Category #2 - glass bottles /plastic bottles 1 & 2 /aluminum
cans /steel cans.
e. What is the collection frequency? (If frequency is different based on type of housing, please
describe differences.) Maplewood will be changing from an every other week collection
frequency to a weekly collection frequency. The effective date of the change is January 1,
2006. The City will be divided into five districts representing each day of the week. Recycling
collection services will occur Monday thru Friday.
2. How will the municipality assure materials are collected in 2006 from those households that
will not receive recycling collection services under a municipally- arranged contract? (e.g., ordinance
provisions, licensing requirements, other mechanism) What materials are required to be collected,
and at what frequency? The Maplewood City Council adopted an Ordinance Requiring Recycling
Services For Residential Properties With Two Or More Units. The ordinance will be effective
starting January 1, 2006. The ordinance requires all property owners to ensure recycling
services are available to the tenants that reside there. The same materials itemized in the
response to question #1d will be required to be collected. The frequency will vary with each
multi -unit property depending on size and participation - Service will occur at least weekly and
in some cases twice a week.
3. How will the municipality assure that all recyclables collected from residential properties are
recycled, whether collected by the municipality's contracted vendor or another service provider?
The City will examine the monthly statements from City contractor (Eureka Recycling) and
those units that are not serviced by City contractor will be required to submit semi annual
reports to the City disclosing the locations of the recycling facilities.
4. What changes are planned or anticipated for 2006? The City is changing recycling vendors
effective January 1, 2006. The City entered into a five year contract with Eureka
Recycling. The City will be providing weekly collection services (represents a change from bi
- weekly) to the residents of the City. The City will focus on increasing participation with
the multi- family properties. The City will also be working with the City of Maplewood's
Environmental Committee to educate and increase recycling tonnage with the single family
properties.
5. How are recycling services in 2006 to be paid for, beyond any use of SCORE funds? What long-
term funding source is in place for recycling services? The City has a recycling line item on
the utility bills. All single family and multi -unit properties pay a monthly fee for recycling
services. The current recycling fee is $6.05 per quarter per unit. The recycling rate will
not change for 2006.
6. Describe the municipality's source reduction and recycling promotional efforts. List types of
materials to be used, intended audiences, and method and frequency of distribution. The City
utilizes the Maplewood City Newsletter (monthly publication) and the City's website to
promote and encourage source reduction and recycling. The City will also be utilizing direct
mailing for the purpose of educating the residents of the City. The Environmental
Committee has also been very involved in promoting source reduction and recycling within
the City. In 2006, the City of Maplewood will be forming an internal committee to assist
the City in its recycling and source reduction efforts.
7. What measurable goals do you have for source reduction and recycling activities in 2006?
At least ONE measurable goal must be listed. Please describe how you will measure progress
toward those goals and how activities will be evaluated. One goal would be to increase recycling
tonnage by 10% for 2006 by switching from an every other week service program to a weekly
program. Another goal would be to increase participation at multi -unit complexes. Both of
these goals would be measured by comparing existing figures from 2005 and 2006.
8. If any activities will be conducted by a contractor or subcontractor, what provisions will be made
to monitor and audit those activities? The City does not anticipate the use of a
subcontractor for recycling services.
B. SCORE GRANT REQUEST
1. Please describe how a SCORE grant would enhance or improve source reduction and recycling
efforts in your community. List specific activities for which SCORE funding would be used. The
SCORE grant monies for 2006 will be used for partial payment of recycling contractor
costs.
2. Please show how you intend to allocate your 2006 SCORE grant. Detail how you intend to
use SCORE funds within each applicable budget area. Attach a copy of your 2006
municipal budget for all recycling activities, including all funding sources. If the budget
has not been adopted by your governing body, attach the most current draft budget.
* Please refer to the attached proposed budget for 2006 for the Recycling Program.
*
PROPOSED SCORE BUDGET —SCORE EXPENSES ONLY
ADMINISTRATION: $
PROMOTION ACTIVITIES $
Please detail:
EQUIPMENT $
Please detail:
COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE5 $ 67,442
Please detail:
The SCORE grant funds will be used for partial payment to Eureka Recycling for
collection of recyclables in the City of Maplewood.
TOTAL SCORE GRANT $ 67,442
C. IN -HOUSE RECYCLING PROGRAM
Please describe the recycling program for materials generated at municipal facilities, per
requirements in Minn. 5tat. 5ec. 115A.151. List materials collected and service provider(s).
If any materials are brought to a drop -off center or otherwise not handled by a collection
service, list those materials and describe how they are transferred. The City of Maplewood
and all other municipal buildings including parks, fire stations, and the Maplewood
Community Center will be utilizing a two sort collection process. The municipal facilities
recycling collection process will mirror the residential process. Eureka Recycling will also
be providing service to these buildings and will be utilizing there processing facility as
well. Two sort collection - Sorting Category #1 - newspaper /junk mail /phone
books /magazines /cardboard /office paper /boxboard. Sorting Category #2 - glass
bottles /plastic bottles 1 & 2 /aluminum cans /steel cans.
D. RESOLUTION
Please attach a resolution from your governing body requesting the funding allocation or a certified
copy of the official proceedings at which the request was approved. SCORE grants agreements
cannot be issued without such an attachment. A copy of the City Council minutes will be mailed
to Ramsey County upon approval (targeting the fourth Monday in November for discussion with
council).
NAME OF PER5ON AUTHORIZED TO SUBMIT GRANT:
DuWayne Konewko
TYPE OR PRINT
SIGNATURE
Environmental Manager
TITLE
October 31, 2005
DATE
Agenda Item G4
IMI:IM[a]:L1ki Bill MI
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Ken Roberts, Planner
SUBJECT:
Final Plat
PROJECT:
Woodhill
LOCATION: Dahl Avenue, south of Linwood Avenue
DATE: November 4, 2005
INTRODUCTION
Bruce Nedegaard is requesting that the city council approve the final plat for Woodhill.
Mr. Nedegaard represents the developer and builder, Woodhill LLC. This final plat will create 15 lots
for single dwellings and two outlots for the existing wetlands and pipelines. It will be south of
Linwood Avenue on a new cul -de -sac called Dahl Avenue. (See the maps on pages two - five.)
BACKGROUND
On February 23, 2004, the city council approved the following for the Woodhill PUD:
A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) for a 15 -unit housing
development.
2. The preliminary plat to create the lots in the development.
3. A zoning map change from F (farm residence) to R -1 (single dwellings).
(See the city council minutes starting on page six.)
DISCUSSION
The contractor is progressing with the construction of the plat. To date, the contractor has completed
the site grading, has installed the utilities, the curb and gutter and base course of bituminous for the
street. The developer has finished all the conditions the council required for final plat approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the final plat for Woodhill date - stamped October 26, 2005. This approval is subject to the
county recording the deeds, deed restrictions and covenants required by the city and the developer
meeting all the conditions of the city engineer.
p:sec13 -28 /woodhill fn plat - 2005.doc
Attachments:
Location Map
Zoning Map
Proposed Final plat
Approved Preliminary Plat
February 23, 2004 City Council Minutes
Proposed Final Plat (Separate Attachment)
Attachment 2
m • w +T. � ea .
)2 Q
f r e
N
•fz � � � I � �.....j aY1 O
jjn,�JOOD WE
` Woodhill
Site
s _
Imo} ;;
�rv^ Si
1 ^J cD a
s 4
Zoning Map ,
2516 Linwood Avenue
O
4
N
•fz � � � I � �.....j aY1 O
jjn,�JOOD WE
` Woodhill
Site
s _
Imo} ;;
�rv^ Si
1 ^J cD a
s 4
Zoning Map ,
2516 Linwood Avenue
Attachment 3
G R,F OF x Nla or 1'x8 Va Of T>� M s+ U4 OF WOODHILL
na', SEMON I] TOWNSkfS d9; RtiNCE T2
RnmEEY cat.TTi', CAST MGXMOWL'MEIZ7 - - - - - - ----7
_r - - - _ - - - - - - --
—, --------------- NU 94 824.65 �OR: i{ UNE OF OF
LN11
j
7 M,
I r I
34'47"E 823.61 4'W IA OF ��VA OF STC. 13, T. M
of ME w OF�
VICINITY MAP
----------
----------
NW 1/4 NE 1j'+
------------- --------------
sE: -
1 4 K 1
/
------------- — ------- ------
PROPOSED FINAL PLAT
DEVELOPEF1 ENGINEER SURVEYOR ARCHITECT
allm£4 1 VL'N Y 13
LINWOOD AVE. E
7 -
ltnnl-
r7l,
BLOCK I -----------
OE
om
2
7
Flo
7 1
----------
-1
3
4
17
sr,
27
BL: WK 2
PH
4
WOODHILL
3 M2 el ka4 R
NEDEGAARD CUSTOM HOMES
VAPLrWC00, MN
PRELIMINARY PLAY
OUTLOT 8
PH
4
WOODHILL
3 M2 el ka4 R
NEDEGAARD CUSTOM HOMES
VAPLrWC00, MN
PRELIMINARY PLAY
PH
4
MINUTES Attachment 5
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:08 P.M., Monday, February 23, 2004
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 04 -04
A. CALL TO ORDER:
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the Municipal
Building, and was called to order at 7:08 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Jackie Monahan - Junek, Councilmember Present
Will Rossbach. Councilmember Present
2. 9:15 p.m. Woodhill Subdivision (2516 Linwood Avenue)
Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat
Zoning Map Change (F to R -1)
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Associate Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report.
C. Commissioner Dierich presented the Planning Commission Report.
d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents.
The following persons were heard:
Bruce Nedegaard, representing Nedegaard Custom Homes
Mary Dierich, speaking as a private concerned citizen
e. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional
use permit for a planned unit development for the 15 -unit Woodhill development on the
south side of Linwood Avenue:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 04 -02 -034
WHEREAS, Mr. Bruce Nedegaard applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for the
Woodhill residential planned unit development (PUD).
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the 15 -lot Woodhill development the city received on
January 2, 2004. The legal description is:
The North one -half of the West one -half of the NW '/a of the NE '/a of Section, Township
28, Range 22, according to the US Survey thereof: and
City Conncil Meeting 02 -23 -04 1
The North one -half of the West one -half of the West one -half of the East one -half of the
NW '/a of the NE '/a of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, according to the US
Government Survey thereof, in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County,
Minnesota.
(The property to be known as Lots 1 -6, Block 1 and Lots 1 -9, Block 2 of Woodhill)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
On February 2, 2004, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve this permit.
On February 23, 2004, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published
a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The
council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written
statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city
staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described
conditional use permit because:
The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
All construction shall follow the plans approved by the city. The city council may
approve major changes to the plans. The Director of Community Development may
approve minor changes to the plans. Such changes shall include:
a. Revising the grading and site to show:
City Conncil Meeting 02 -23 -04
(1) The developer minimizing the loss or removal of natural vegetation including
keeping and protecting as many of the trees as possible.
(2) Revised storm water pond locations and storm water system designs as
suggested or required by the watershed district or city engineer. The ponds shall
meet the city's design standards.
2. The proposed construction of the plat must be substantially started within one year of
council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for
one year.
1. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall meet all the conditions and changes noted in the city engineer's memo dated
January 22, 2004.
2. The approved setbacks for the principal structures in the Woodhill development shall be:
a. Front -yard setback (from a public street right -of -way): minimum - 20 feet, maximum
— 45 feet
b. Front -yard setback (public side street right -of -way): minimum - 20 feet, maximum -
none
c. Rear -yard setback: 30 feet from any adjacent residential property line
b. Side -yard setback: minimum - 10 feet from a property line and 20 feet minimum
between buildings.
i. The developer or contractor shall:
a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the ponds, install all retaining walls
as required and any other site improvements required by the city engineer and meet
all city requirements.
b. Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
C. Remove the house, any debris or junk from the site.
6. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Woodhill preliminary plat (Received by
the citv on February 12. 2004). The developer shall complete the followina before the
city council approves the final plat:
1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all retaining walls, site
landscaping and meet all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
City Conncil Meeting 02 -23 -04
c. Have Xcel Energy install Group V rate street lights in two locations - primarily at the
street intersections and at the west end of the cul -de -sac. The exact style and
location shall be subject to the city engineer's approval.
d. Provide all required and necessary easements (including all utility easements and
ten -foot drainage and utility easements along the front and rear lot lines of each lot
and five -foot drainage and utility easements along the side lot lines of each lot).
e. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These
signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state that there shall be no
mowing, vegetation cutting, filling, building, grading or dumping beyond this point.
City staff shall approve the sign design and location before the contractor installs
them. The developer or contractor shall install these signs before the city issues
building permits in this plat.
f. Install survey monuments along the wetland and wetland buffer boundaries.
g. Pay the city for the cost of traffic - control, street identification, wetland buffer and no
parking signs.
h. Provide all required and necessary easements, including any off -site easements.
i. Demolish or remove the existing house and garage from the site, and remove all
other buildings, fencing, trailers, scrap metal, debris and junk from the site.
j. Cap and seal all wells on site that the owners are not using; and remove septic
systems or drainfields, subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines.
k. Complete all curb on Linwood Avenue on the north side of the site. This is to replace
the existing driveways on Linwood Avenue, and restore and sod the boulevards.
2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, and street plans. The plans
shall meet all the conditions and changes listed in the memo dated January 22, 2004,
and shall meet the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code and shall be
extremely detailed to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
b. The grading plan shall show:
(1) The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site.
The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat.
(2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
(3) House pads that:
a. Reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large trees.
This shall include following the project plans submitted to the city on February
12, 2004. The house pad locations on Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 2 shall meet
the approved development setback requirements to more closely match the
other house setbacks and orientation on the street.
b. Meet the 100 -foot setback from the pipelines for Lot 6, Block 1 and Lot 1,
Block 2.
9
City Conncil Meeting 02 -23 -04
(4) The proposed street and driveway grades as allowed by the city engineer.
(5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve
the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than
3:1. On slopes steeper than 3:1, the developer shall prepare and implement a
stabilization and planting plan. At a minimum, the slopes shall be protected with
(6) wood -fiber blanket, be seeded with a no- maintenance vegetation and be
stabilized before the city approves the final plat.
(7) Include the tree plan that:
a. Shows where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This
plan shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
b. Shows no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
(7) All retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a
building permit from the city.
(8) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed district or by the
city engineer.
(9) No grading beyond the plat boundary without temporary grading easements
from the affected property owner(s).
(10) As little grading as possible north and south of the proposed street. This is
to keep as many of the existing trees on the site as is reasonably possible.
(11) The pipelines and the 8- foot -wide trail from the cul -de -sac to the south
property line.
c. The street and utility plans shall show:
(1) The street with a width of 28 feet (with parking on one side), shall be a 9 -ton
design with a maximum street grade of eight percent and the maximum
street grade within 75 feet of the intersection at two percent.
(2) The new street (Dahl Avenue) with continuous concrete ribbon curb, except
where the city engineer determines that concrete curbing is necessary.
(3) The completion or replacement of the curb on the south side of Linwood
Avenue and the restoration and sodding of the boulevards.
(4) Repair of Linwood Avenue (curb, street and boulevard) after the developer
connects to the public utilities and builds the new street.
(5) A set of utility services to the eastern part of the property at 2480 Linwood
Avenue and public utility services to each new lot.
(6) The coordination of the water main alignments and sizing with the standards
and requirements of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS).
(7) All utility excavations located within the proposed right -of -ways or within
easements. The develpJp?er shall acquire easements for all utilities that would
be outside the project idea.
City Conncil Meeting 02 -23 -04
(8) The plan and profiles of the proposed utilities.
(9) A detail of any ponds, the pond outlets and the rainwater gardens. The
contractor shall protect the outlets to prevent erosion.
(10) The cul -de -sac with a minimum pavement radius of at least 42 feet.
(11) Label Linwood Avenue and the new street as Dahl Avenue on all construction
and project plans.
The drainage plan shall ensure that there is no increase in the rate of storm water
run -off leaving the site above the current (predevelopment) levels. The developer's
engineer shall:
(1) Verify inlet and pipe capacities.
(2) Submit drainage design calculations.
e. A landscape plan for the areas along the street, including the rainwater gardens
and the cul -de -sac island. The coniferous trees shall be at least six feet tall and
any deciduous trees shall be at least 2'/ inches in diameter.
3. Change the plat as follows:
a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer.
b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat.
These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines
and five feet wide along the side property lines.
c. Label any common areas as outlots.
d. Label the new street as Dahl Avenue on all plans.
e. As may be necessary to ensure that houses on Lot 6, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2
would be at least 100 feet from the pipelines.
4. Pay for costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction
plans.
5. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including wetland
buffer easements and any off -site drainage and utility easements. These shall
include, but not be limited to, an easement for the culvert draining the pond at the
northwest corner of the plat.
6. The developer shall complete all site grading and retaining wall construction. The
city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the
developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval.
7. Sign a developer's agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or
contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, install all retaining walls, install the
landscaping for the rainwater gardens and the cul -de -sac island, install all other
City Conncil Meeting 02 -23 -04
necessary improvements and meet all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Provide for the repair of Linwood Avenue (street, curb and boulevard) after the
developer connects to the public utilities.
d. Meet all the requirements of the city engineer.
Submit the homeowners' association bylaws and rules to the director of community
development. These are to assure that there will be one responsible party for the
maintenance of the common areas, landscaping and retaining walls.
9. Record the following with the final plat:
a. All homeowners' association documents.
b. A covenant or deed restriction with the final plat that prohibits any driveways on
Lots 1 through 6, Block 1 and Lot 9, Block 2 from going onto Linwood Avenue.
c. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision or splitting of
the lots or parcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless
approved by the city council.
d. A covenant or association documents that addresses the proper installation,
maintenance and replacement of the retaining walls.
e. Deeds transferring the ownership of Outlots A and B to the city. The city will
accept ownership of these outlots in lieu of charging PAC (park access charges)
with the building permits.
f. All wetland and wetland buffer easements.
The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to
the city for approval before recording.
Obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading.
10. Obtain a NPDES construction permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(M PCA).
11. Submit to city staff a copy of the written permission from the pipeline company for
any grading or construction within the pipeline easement.
12. The property owner shall submit a petition to the city requesting the installation of
the public improvements.
13. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of
community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final
plat.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit
or approves the final plat. 12
City Conncil Meeting 02 -23 -04
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following zoning map change resolution
from F (farm Residence) to R -1 (single Dwelling Residential) for the proposed Woodhill
plat on the south side of Linwood Avenue:
I"kaLIIki "M /e1all71-11ki [r]AN *161141 PL Kill fflyz* v
WHEREAS, Maplewood city staff is proposing to change the Maplewood zoning map
from Farm Residence (F) to Single - Family Residential (R -1).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located at 2516 Linwood Avenue in the
north one -half of Section 13, Township 29, Range 22, in Maplewood, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the property owner is proposing to plat the property into 15 lots for single
dwellings.
WHEREAS, the proposed development is known as Woodhill and the new legal
description will be:
Lots 1 through 6, Block 1, and Lots 1 through 9, Block 2, Woodhill.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
On February 2, 2004, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve the zoning map change.
On February 23, 2004, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners.
The council conducted the public hearing whereby all public present were given a
chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports
and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above -
described change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring
property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property
adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community,
where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers,
police and fire protection and schools.
5. The owner has plans to develop this property for lots for single - family houses.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All
13
City Council 02 -23 -04
Agenda Item G5
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Kevin Christiansen, Planning Intern
SUBJECT:
Home Occupation License Review
APPLICANT:
Mr. David Grupa
LOCATION:
1994 Duluth Street
DATE:
November 2. 2005
I.III III :is] 1111101 [a].
City staff is requesting that the city council review a home occupation license. The city council
approved this license for Mr. Grupa to operate a digital photography studio in the detached garage
located on his property at 1994 Duluth Street. Mr. Grupa was required by the city to obtain a
building permit to remodel the structure in order to operate the business. Mr. Grupa also will be
making exterior improvements in the backyard of the residence to accommodate clients. These
improvements will include a six -foot fence for screening and landscaping. (Please see the maps
beginning on page 2).
BACKGROUND
On November 8, 2004, the city council first considered this request and tabled action on it to allow
the applicant to make changes to the proposal.
November 22, 2004, city council approved the home occupation license for Mr. Grupa of Duluth
Street to have a photography studio in the detached garage. This approval was subject to several
conditions of approval. (See the council minutes starting on page 5).
DISCUSSION
Mr. Grupa was issued a building permit by the city to remodel his garage on 3/4/05. The
remodeling of the detached garage for the purpose of a digital photography studio is complete and
it meets the city conditions for the home occupation license. However, adequate screening has not
been constructed in the backyard. City staff has not received any complaints regarding the
operation of the business. The remodeling of the garage was finished late in the fall, not allowing
time for the installation of a 6- foot -high solid fence screening before the winter months. Mr. Grupa
plans to use the backyard for photography, therefore city staff recommends reviewing the home
occupation license in June, 2006.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the home occupation license for the property at 1994 Duluth Street in June, 2006. This will
allow Mr. Grupa time to install the fencing in order to use the backyard for photography.
P/sec16/1994 Duluth Home Occupation PC /Review 05
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. 11 -22 -04 City Council Minutes
LOcafi Mai.;
Attachment 1
:229
.x.£
121W -:
za
_
121
-
m a.
-
122h
-.. ..
SHRY
C
x
2009
r
c
,..
i
� 3
1210
Huss °
£
#
#..:
1227 °
1215 ..,..
L..
1211 '
GG.
e*s'',.
x::
w
1589
2 x x �„ s
£
x #
".
Ave
RYAN
£
!931
A
=
�*•:x,�
r
3 1 ? ?4
12%
1 3
x 1
r
121^
x
LOcafi Mai.;
u L
Keller Golf Course
2108
2993'
}
co
,, 4
1218
1216.
y i
1ON
8 1f
:.°"— NMI
1219
J
m u
RY A'`s AVE
Attachment 3
M-
I I
r
C
WOMPI
MINUTES Attachment 4
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:05 P.M. Monday, November 22, 2004
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 04 -26
I0
C.
J.
CALL TO ORDER:
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the City Hall, and was
called to order at 7:05 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present
Jackie Monahan - Junek, Councilmember Present
Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Home Occupation License -David Grupa Photography (1994 Duluth Street)
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report.
C. David Grupa, the applicant, provided further specifics and answered questions from the
council.
d. Wayne Nelson, homeowner at 1995 Duluth Street, addressed the council.
Councilmember Monahan -Junk moved to approve the home occupation license for Mr. Grupa
of 1994 Duluth Street to have a photography studio. This approval shall be subject to the
following conditions:
1. Meet all conditions of the city's home occupation ordinance. This includes:
a. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volume than would
normally be expected in a residential neighborhood.
b. The need for off - street parking shall not exceed more than three off - street parking spaces
for home occupation at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the
residents.
c. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation that creates noise,
vibration, light, glare, fumes, smoke, dust, odors or electrical interference detectable to
the normal senses off the lot.
d. There shall be no fire, safety or health hazards.
e. The studio shall not exceed 514 square feet in area.
61
City Council 11 -22 -04
2. Customer hours for this home occupation are limited to: Monday through Friday 10 a.m. to 7
p.m. and Saturday 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
3. There shall be no more than 25 appointments at the business per week.
4. All customers or visitors to the business shall park on the driveway.
5. Provide a five -pound ABC dry chemical fire extinguisher in the garage.
6. The garage and studio wiring shall meet the state electrical code.
7. Provide a 3 -foot egress exit door out of the garage.
8. Obtain a building permit before construction.
9. The remodeling of the exterior of the north and west sides of the garage shall be consistent with
the adjacent properties as to not indicate the presence of a home occupation business.
10. Provide screening along the south border of the backyard from the southeast corner of the house
to the south edge of the lot line and extending at least 10 feet along the east lot line. This
screening is to ensure privacy and lessen the intrusion for the residence located at 1211 Ryan
Avenue. This screening should be in the form of a 6- foot -high solid fence or with the planting of
thick shrubs or large trees.
11. There shall be no processing or developing of film on site.
12. The city council may add additional requirements that it deems necessary to ensure that the
operation of the home occupation will be compatible with nearby land uses.
13. The city council shall review this home occupation license again in one year.
14. The owner shall return the garage door to operational use after the end of the home occupation.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
[:1
City Council 11 -22 -04
Agenda Item G.6
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Shann Finwall, AICP, Planner
SUBJECT: Oversized Accessory Building Conditional Use Permit Review
APPLICANT: Steven Peltier
LOCATION: 1236 Kohlman Avenue
DATE: November 7. 2005
II.11 d:is] Bill" d[a].
The two conditional use permits (CUP) for the property at 1236 Kohlman Avenue are due for
review. The CUPS were required to allow the owner, Steven Peltier, to expand a nonconforming
residential use within a light manufacturing zoning district by constructing an oversized accessory
structure on the property. The accessory structure was approved at 1,344 square feet in area,
which is 558 square feet over the allowable size requirements.
Q 6.18111 :9 [a].
Mr. Peltier has completed the construction of the accessory structure. Because the property is
located within the shoreland overlay district of Kohlman Lake, a condition of approval was that Mr.
Peltier construct a 560 square foot concrete parking pad in front of the garage, with the remainder
of the driveway as gravel, and that two rainwater gardens be constructed and planted with native
plants on the north and south side of the accessory structure.
Upon inspection of the site staff finds that the concrete pad and rainwater gardens have been
constructed and the native plants installed. However, it appears that the grading for the
construction of the accessory structure has left the hill located on the southeast corner of the
property eroded and in need of a retaining wall or plantings to prevent further erosion. City staff
will work with Mr. Peltier to ensure this is accomplished in a timely manner. The city council should
also review the two CUPS again in one year to ensure the rainwater gardens are maintained and
functioning properly and that all other conditions of approval are met.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Steven Peltier's two conditional use permits for the property at 1236 Kohlman Avenue for
the expansion of a nonconforming residential property and the construction of an oversized
accessory structure at 1236 Kohlman Avenue. The city should review the conditional use permits
again in one year.
P:sec4 \1236 Kohlman Avenue \2005 CUP Review
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Grading /Drainage Plan
4. Elevations
Attachment 1
MIN
N
S
aa`
Jj � O
0 0�
o
Q O❑ Q
D o ❑� a
D aE-F
0
1236 Kohlman Avenue o 0 ❑o rE
Steven Peltier °� o P o
0
0
—L
E
0 �) �5 o
o
TO D 00
El
o
❑ E-1 ❑
Location Map
Attachment 2
A
Mbft*4*�, "4.
K4ca
ccn Iwr*44 aocr,
teza..+y w s.
8
�►d 3tnc�s R
y,
I I 1
I ; i
I � I
c+aa*w +acAroba
LtI. rs.a.ad. �j� b n
'li
a
•
Attachment 3
LA 9
is
f fl ,
:!SjdE "4:[Ew
9
bNiA 1(
1�
+ID
MC4 Y1
cx
P0041)Q
1
EAST C5iir--)
Elevations
2. Customer hours for this home occupation are limited to: Monday through Friday 10 a.m. to 7
p.m. and Saturday 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
3. There shall be no more than 25 appointments at the business per week.
4. All customers or visitors to the business shall park on the driveway.
5. Provide a five -pound ABC dry chemical fire extinguisher in the garage.
6. The garage and studio wiring shall meet the state electrical code.
7. Provide a 3 -foot egress exit door out of the garage.
8. Obtain a building permit before construction.
9. The remodeling of the exterior of the north and west sides of the garage shall be consistent with
the adjacent properties as to not indicate the presence of a home occupation business.
10. Provide screening along the south border of the backyard from the southeast corner of the house
to the south edge of the lot line and extending at least 10 feet along the east lot line. This
screening is to ensure privacy and lessen the intrusion for the residence located at 1211 Ryan
Avenue. This screening should be in the form of a 6- foot -high solid fence or with the planting of
thick shrubs or large trees.
11. There shall be no processing or developing of film on site.
12. The city council may add additional requirements that it deems necessary to ensure that the
operation of the home occupation will be compatible with nearby land uses.
13. The city council shall review this home occupation license again in one year.
14. The owner shall return the garage door to operational use after the end of the home occupation.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
DI
City Council 11 -22 -04
Agenda Item G7
MI :IM[a]:L1ki I Bill M
TO: City Manager
FROM: Kevin Christiansen, Planning Intern
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review
LOCATION: 601 Century Avenue South (south of Lower Afton Road)
PROJECT: Ponds of Battle Creek Golf Course
DATE: November 1, 2005
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Ponds of Battle Creek Golf Course, 601 Century Avenue
South, is due for review. The CUP is for a golf course in an F (farm residence) zoning district. (See the
maps on pages two through four the city council minutes starting on page five.)
1- 7e[83:(H:Zo1ll1.U7
On November 13, 2001, the city council approved a CUP and the design plans for the golf course.
(See the council minutes starting on page five.)
On November 13, 2002, the council reviewed this permit and agreed to review it again in one year.
On November 10, 2003, the council reviewed this permit and agreed to review it again in one year.
On November 8, 2004, the city council reviewed this permit and agreed to review it again in one year.
Q 6Y811Jr :9 [a].
The county opened the practice and driving range in August 2003 and opened the course for play in
the spring of 2004. After the county opened the driving range, both the city and the county received
complaints about the lights being poorly aimed and for being too bright. Kevin Finley of the Ramsey
County Parks Department had the lights evaluated by their engineers and contractor. As a result of
this review, they made several adjustments and changes to the lights to meet the city's outdoor
lighting ordinance. The lighting problems have been resolved and city staff has not received any
complaints since the county made the changes to the lights.
INx8101MIMI:Iki ULAI[a]ki
The council should only review this permit again if a problem arises or if the owner proposes a
significant change to the site or to the golf course.
Kr /p:sec 12 -28 /ponds golf review.05
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Neighborhood Map
3. Site Plan
4. 11 -13 -01 city council minutes
Attachment 1
gS
h
Maintenance
�o
Building Site
LONDIN LN
Cr6
]qwP rk
z
Rp
�� W
p0� _
O AV e
K ING , ST ¢
MAILAND.RD PONDS OF
° BATTLE CREEK
o MaOaod ark GOLF COURSE
w
w VSta Hills Park
U
F
E�
i „
HILLWOOD DR
;L
_ o
f
G
L INWOOD AVE
<: o
0
Park
TIMBER CT O
O o
7
PHVLIS CT A SC HALLER
WAL EV_VI� EW.AVE� � a �
LOCATION MAP
Attachment 2
NEIGHBORHOOD MAP
Attachment 3
x
6T. PAUL POLICE
r:lRING RANGE
LINWOOD Avwvv=
......... .. .......... .
uj
z
uj
Q
y.
uJ
u y
q'
14�� 72
M
I
ARE,
MINUTES Attachment 4
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Tuesday, November 13, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 01 -27
A. CALL TO ORDER:
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, at the Municipal Building, and was
called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
3. 7:15 P.M. Ramsey County Productive Day Golf Course (Century Avenue and Lower Afton
Road)
a. Conditional Use Permit
b. Design Approval
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
C. Assistant Community Development Director Ekstrand presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Commissioner Dale Trippler presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Boardmember Matt Ledvina presented the Community Design Review Board report
f. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
GaylePoradek, 376 O'Day Street, Maplewood
Tom Loven, 589 S. Sterling Street, Maplewood
Kevin Finley, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation
g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approved the following resolution for a Conditional Use
Permit and Design approval for the Ramsey County Productive Day Golf Course:
5 1
RESOLUTION 01 -11 -109
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Ramsey County applied for a conditional use permit to construct a nine -hole golf course.
WHEREAS, Section 36 -52(4) of the city code requires a conditional use permit for golf courses in an F (farm
residence) district and Section 36- 437(1) requires a conditional use permit for any public service or public building
use.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located on the west side of Century Avenue between Lower
Afton Road and Linwood Avenue. The legal description is:
THE E '/ OF THE SE '' /QAND THE SE ' / 4 OF THE NE ' / 4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 28, RANGE 22,
RAMSEY COUNTY. MINNESOTA.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On October 15, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On November 13, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city
staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use
permit, because:
The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation
that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person
or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other
nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and
fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the approved site plan. The director of community development may approve
minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit
shall become null and void.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. If Ramsey County sells this golf course to a private individual or company, they must request an
amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan to change the plan for this site from G
(government) to P (park) or OS (open space).
5. The applicant shall dedicate wetland- buffer easements around each wetland on the golf course
property. These easements shall describe the boundaries of the buffers and prohibit any building,
mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffers. The applicant shall record the deeds for these
easements before the city will issue grading and building permits. (code requirement) The applicant
shall check with the city staff for the width of each buffer easement prior to drafting any easement
documentation.
6. The applicant shall install wetland buffer signs that prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or
dumping within each wetland buffer. (code requirement)
7. The driving range lights shall not be on later than 10:30 p.m.
B. Approve the plans (date- stamped September 13, 2001 and September 20, 2001) for the proposed
Productive Day Golf Course on the west side of Century Avenue between Lower Afton Road and Linwood
Avenue, based on the findings required by the code. The property owner, Ramsey County, shall do the
following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a permit for this project.
2. Provide the following for staff approval before the city issues grading or building permits:
a. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan, subject to the city engineer's approval.
b. A final landscape plan that clearly depicts the perimeter landscaping across from or behind all
dwellings. The applicant shall work with all adjacent homeowners to develop this plan to meet
citizens' needs.
c. A final, detailed photometric plan for all proposed outdoor lighting.
d. A revised site plan showing a right -turn lane into the site from Century Avenue and a signed and
striped crossing area between the maintenance building and the golf course.
e. The dedication of wetland -buffer easements around each wetland on the golf course property.
These easements shall describe the boundaries of the buffers and prohibit any building, mowing,
cutting, filling or dumping within the buffers. The applicant shall record the deeds for these
easements before the city will issue grading and building permits. The applicant shall check with
the city staff for the width of each buffer easement prior to drafting any easement documentation.
3. Complete the following before opening the golf course for business and occupying the clubhouse
building:
a. Install a reflectorized stop sign at the exit from the Century Avenue driveway.
b. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure for any outside trash containers for this facility. (code
requirement) The enclosures must be 100 percent opaque, match the color of the building and
have a closeable gate that extends to the ground.
c. Install all required landscaping around the driveway, parking lot and clubhouse. It is understood
that the landscaping of the golf course will take place over a five -year time period.
d. Install wetland buffer signs that prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within each
wetland buffer. (code requirement)
4. If any required work is not done on or around the clubhouse, clubhouse parking lot, maintenance
building and maintenance building parking lot, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work.
The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the unfinished work.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor
changes.
6. Signs shall comply with the requirements of the sign code and are not part of this approval.
7. Black vinyl- covered chain link fencing is approved around the golf course. The applicant may install a
lesser amount but should attempt to install fencing according to the wishes of abutting property owners.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes-All
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - All
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Tom Ekstrand. Senior Planner
Agenda Item G8
SUBJECT: Woodlynn Ponds Townhomes — Planned Unit Development Review
DATE: October 24, 2005
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Woodlynn Ponds Townhomes planned unit development
(PUD) is due for its one -year annual review. The PUD allows this 26 -unit townhome development
with 10 buildings fronting on a private roadway running south from County Road D to the Xcel
power line easement. There are also three twin homes fronting on Woodlynn Avenue south of the
Xcel easement. Refer to the attachments.
BACKGROUND
July 8, 2003: The community design review board approved the design plans.
July 14, 2003: The city council approved the preliminary plat, a wetland- encroachment variance, a
planned unit development and the design plans for Woodlynn Ponds. Refer to the attached PUD
conditions.
September 8, 2003: The city council approved the final plat.
July 12, 2004: The city council reviewed this PUD and required review again in one year.
DISCUSSION
City code requires that the city council review CUPS annually to check on project status. This
development is under construction and nine of 13 buildings are built.
Staff has been working with the developer and the various builders in this development to monitor
the completion of site requirements (landscaping, pond completion and weed control). Mendota
Homes started this project. After they obtained their city approvals and recorded the plat, they sold
several of the lots to Wilkinson Construction. The remaining lots were then purchased by GM
Homes. Wilkinson Construction has had difficulty with completing their units and properties. GM
Homes has done an excellent job and have, themselves, been trying to work with Wilkinson to
complete Wilkinson's home sites.
Since last years review, there have been instances of slow completion of buildings, some problems
with weed control and problems with the proper completion of drainage ponds. The city's assistant
city engineer, Erin Laberee, has been working to make sure that corrections are made for grading
and drainage plan compliance. Improvements have been made, but this project will require
periodic review and continual monitoring by city staff.
Staff is holding escrow to ensure that the contractors finish all required site work. We will continue
to hold this escrow until the completion of the project. Staff recommends council review of this
project again next summer to check on its progress and compliance with plans and city
requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit for the Woodlynn Ponds Townhomes PUD in July, 2006.
p:sec2N \Woodlynn Ponds CUP Rev T05
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. PUD Development Plan
3. July 14, 2003 PUD Conditions
�C 1
COUN rY ROAD D
Attachment 1
m
Jill 111 11111
III milli
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WOODLYN PONDS
FOR: MENDOTA HOMES INC,
-- - - - - - - - -
- -
E
ro
4J
<
lilt
I
I
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WOODLYN PONDS
FOR: MENDOTA HOMES INC,
RECEIVED ��
MAY 2 2003
liM fog
z
- ----------- I ------- -------
Al
-- - - - - - - - -
- -
Q gn
1
RECEIVED ��
MAY 2 2003
liM fog
z
- ----------- I ------- -------
Al
Attachment 3
WHEREAS, Section 36- 438 {b} of the city code provides a means to allow flexibility in design by the
planned unit development process.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2090 County Road D East. The legal description is:
TRACT A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 463, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 16, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On July 22, 2003, the city council held a public hearing, The city staff published a notice in the paper
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance
to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of
the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described conditional
use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation
that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other
nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and
fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans date - stamped May 20, 2003. The city council may
approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or
the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant shall provide a noise evaluation for this site to determine if freeway noise would
impact their proposed units above the maximum noise levels required by the MnPCA. If freeway
noise does exceed these levels, the applicant shall reduce the outside noise within the units.
5. The homeowners association documents shall state that the visitor parking lot shall be kept open
for visitor parking and shall not be a storage area for RVs, trailers, campers and the like.
6. The applicant shall post the north -south private roadway for no parking on both sides.
The applicant shall make buyers aware, by a statement in the homeowners association
documentation hat the city will periodically burn the prairie grass on the abutting Maplewood
Open space property.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the preliminary plat for the Woodlyn Ponds Twin
Homes. The developer shall complete the following before the city council apprpves the final
plat.
Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all
city requirements.
b. Pay the city for the cost of traffic - control, street identification and no- parking signs.
c. Provide all required and necessary easements, including ten -foot drainage and utility
easements around the perimeter of the property, the wetland buffer easement and the ltl- foot_
pedestrian easement along the north of the property.
d. Cap and seal any wells on site.
e. Have Xcel Energy install street lights. The exact location and type of light shall be subject to
the city engineer's approval.
f. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easement. These signs shall
mark the edge of the easements and shall state that there shall be no mowing, vegetation
cutting, filling, grading oidumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign
design and location before the contractor installs them. The developer or contractor shall
install these signs before the city issues building permits in this plat.
g. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
2. *Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans sh�l
Agenda Item G9
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
FROM: Sherrie Le
Human Resource Director
RE: Senior Administrative Assistant
DATE: November 3, 2005
One of the outcomes of our recent clerical classification study was a recommendation to create
the non -union title of Senior Administrative Assistant and to reclassify the City Manager /Human
Resource /City Council secretary position to this new title. After discussion with the outside
consultant, you accepted the consultant's recommendation and decided to establish the salary
range at 7% above that of Administrative Assistant (formerly the secretary title).
Although the consultant did not know the history of the position until after he made his
recommendation, this position had historically been paid at a higher level than secretary and the
title used in the past was Executive Secretary. So, in effect, this is a return to what it had been
classified in the past.
Based on a salary range of 7% above the secretary (now called Administrative Assistant) salary
range, the 2005 salary range would be $17.97 - $22.95 which is equal to $37,378 - $47,736 per
year.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the 2005 salary range of $37,378 - $47,736 per
year for the new classification of Senior Administrative Assistant effective at the beginning of the
next pay - period.
Agenda Item G10
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
FROM: Sherrie Le
Human Resource Director
RE: Cafeteria Plan Revisions
DATE: November4, 2005
This year the IRS issued a new ruling affecting Cafeteria Plans that are established in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 105 (accident and health plans), 79 (group term life
plans), 125 cafeteria plans and 129 (dependent care plans) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended. The ruling allows the City to create a grace period where employees who
have money in their accounts at the end of a plan year can continue to incur expenses and be
reimbursed from their account for an additional two and '/ months.
Currently, only expenses incurred during the actual plan year (January 1 - December 31) are
eligible for reimbursement from an employee's account. This will extend that period to March
15` of each year. This grace period would apply to our Healthcare Reimbursement and
Dependent -care Reimbursement Programs, creating additional flexibility for employees and
minimizing the risk of forfeiture.
I have worked with our outside Plan Administrator to revise our Master Plan Document and
Summary Plan Description to incorporate this new grace period. There will be a "run -out" period
of 30 days after March 15` where expenses incurred by March 15 can be submitted for
reimbursement.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the revised and restated Master Plan Document
for the Maplewood Cafeteria Plan effective September 1, 2005.
Agenda Item G11
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Human Resource Director
RE: RHS Trust and Welfare Plan Revisions
DATE: November 7. 2005
The IRS issued a ruling this past summer that impacts our Integral Part Trust and Retiree
Medical and Dental Expense Reimbursement Plan (Employee Welfare Benefit Plan). These are
the two plans we have in place that allow us to establish Retiree Health Savings Plans with our
employee groups. We currently have four employee groups with a Retiree Health Savings Plan
in place.
The IRS ruling changed our earlier understanding of who is eligible to receive the account
balance if a participant should die when they have money in their account. If this should
happen, the money automatically transfers to the participant's spouse and if none, to their
eligible dependents, if any to be used in the same manner as the participant could have used
the money. That has not changed.
However, the IRS has now ruled that the account balance cannot be transferred to anyone else
and must stay in the plan. Therefore, if a participant with an account balance dies and does not
have a spouse or eligible dependents, the money must remain in the plan. This revision
requires a change to both the Integral Part Trust and Welfare Benefit Plan documents to provide
that the money will remain in the plan to be distributed to all plan members on an equal dollar
basis. If we do not make these revisions before the end of the year, the plans will lose their tax -
free status.
ICMA has separately requested a ruling on this issue and if they receive a ruling that allows us to
change back our plans - to allow other beneficiaries - we will do so at that time. The required
changes have been made and the revised documents are attached.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the revised Integral Part Trust document and
Retiree Welfare Benefit Plan.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
ARTICLE I
PREAMBLE
THIS INSTRUMENT made and published by the City of Maplewood called
"Employer ") on the 24th day of June, 2002, creates the City of Maplewood Retiree Medical and
Dental Expense Reimbursement Plan, as follows:
1.01 Establishment of Plan
The Employer named above hereby establishes a Retiree Medical and Dental Expense
Reimbursement Plan as of the 1 st day of July, 2002.
1.02 Purpose of Plan
This Plan has been established to reimburse the eligible Retirees of the Employer for
medical and dental expenses incurred by them, their Spouses and Dependents, pursuant to
the Employer's VantageCare Retiree Health Savings (RHS) Plan.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
The following words and phrases as used herein shall have the following meanings, unless a
different meaning is plainly required by the context:
2.01 `Benefits" means any amounts paid to a Participant in the Plan as reimbursement for
Eligible Medical and Dental Expenses incurred by the Participants, their spouses or their
dependents during a Plan Year.
2.02 "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
2.03 "Dependent" means any individual who is a dependent of the Participant within the
meaning of Code Sec. 152.
2.04 "Eligible Medical or Dental Expenses" means those expenses designated by the
Employer as eligible for reimbursement in the VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Plan
Adoption Agreement.
2.05 "Employer" means the unit of state or local government creating this Plan, or any
affiliate or successor thereof that likewise adopts this Plan.
2.06 "Entry Date" means the first day the Participant meets the eligibility requirements of
Article III as of such Date.
2.07 "Participant" means any former employee who has met the eligibility requirements set
forth in Article III.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
2.08 "Plan Administrator" means the Employer or other person appointed by the Employer
who has the authority and responsibility to manage and direct the operation and
administration of the Plan.
2.09 "Plan Year" means the annual accounting period of the Plan, which begins on the 1 st
day of July, 2002, and ends on the 31 s ' day of December, 2002, with respect to the first
Plan Year, and thereafter as long as this Plan remains in effect, the period that begins
on January 1, and ends on December 31.
2.10 "Retiree" means any individual who, while in the service of the Employer, was
considered to be in a legal employer - employee relationship with the Employer for federal
withholding tax purposes, and who was part of the classification of employees designated
as covered by the Employer's VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Plan.
2.11 "Spouse" means the Participant's lawful spouse as determined under the laws of the state
in which Participants have their primary place of residence.
All other defined terms in this Plan shall have the meanings specified in the various Articles of
the Plan in which they appear.
ARTICLE III
ELIGIBILITY
3.01 General Requirements
Each Retiree who meets the eligibility requirements outlined in the Employer's
VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Plan shall be eligible to participate in this Plan.
ARTICLE IV
AMOUNT OF BENEFITS
4.01 Annual Benefits Provided by the Plan
Each Participant shall be entitled to reimbursement for documented, Eligible Medical or
Dental Expenses incurred during the Plan Year in an annual amount not to exceed the
account balance of the Participant in the Employer's VantageCare Retiree Health Savings
Plan.
4.02 Cost of Coverage
The expense of providing the benefits set out in Section 4.01 shall be contributed as
outlined in the Employer's VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Plan.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
ARTICLE V
PAYMENT OF BENEFITS
5.01 Eligibility for Benefits
A. Each Participant in the Plan shall be entitled to a benefit hereunder for all Eligible
Medical and Dental Expenses incurred by the Participant on or after the Entry
Date of his or her participation, (and after the effective date of the Plan) subject to
the limitations contained in Article V, regardless whether the mental or physical
condition for which the Participant makes application for benefits under this Plan
was detected, diagnosed, or treated before the Participant become covered by the
Plan.
B. In order to be eligible for benefits, the Participant must meet the benefit eligibility
criteria outlined in the Employer's VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Plan
Adoption Agreement.
C. A Participant who dies or becomes totally and permanently disabled (as defined
by the Social Security Administration) will become immediately eligible to
receive medical benefit payments from the Plan. Pursuant to Section 9.02 and
Employer's VantageCare Retirement Health Savings Plan Adoption Agreement,
the surviving Spouse and Dependents shall become immediately eligible to
receive or to continue receiving medical benefit payments from the Plan upon the
death of the Participant.
5.02 Claims for Benefits
No benefit shall be paid hereunder unless a Participant, or their Spouse or Dependent, has
first submitted a written claim for benefits to the Plan Administrator on a form specified
by the Plan Administrator, and pursuant to the procedures set out in Article VI, below.
Upon receipt of a properly documented claim, the Plan Administrator shall pay the
Participant, Spouse or Dependent the benefits provided under this Plan as soon as is
administratively feasible.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
ARTICLE VI
PLAN ADMINISTRATION
6.01 Allocation of Authority
The Employer shall control and manage the operation and administration of the Plan.
The Employer shall have the exclusive right to interpret the Plan and to decide all matters
arising thereunder, including the right to remedy possible ambiguities, inconsistencies, or
omissions. All determinations of the Employer with respect to any matter hereunder shall
be conclusive and binding on all persons.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Employer shall have the following
powers and duties:
(a) To decide on questions concerning the Plan and the eligibility of any Employee to
participate in the Plan, in accordance with the provisions of the Plan;
(b) To determine the amount of benefits that shall be payable to any person in
accordance with the provisions of the Plan; to inform the Plan Administrator, as
appropriate, of the amount of such Benefits; and to provide a full and fair review
to any Participant whose claim for benefits has been denied in whole or in part;
and
(c) To designate other persons to carry out any duty or power which would otherwise
be a fiduciary responsibility of the Plan Administrator, under the terms of the
Plan.
(d) To require any person to furnish such reasonable information as it may request for
the purpose of the proper administration of the Plan as a condition to receiving
any benefits under the Plan;
(e) To make and enforce such rules and regulations and prescribe the use of such
forms as they shall deem necessary for the efficient administration of the Plan.
6.02 Provision for Third -Party Plan Service Providers
The Plan Administrator, subject to approval of the Employer, may employ the services of
such persons as it may deem necessary or desirable in connection with the operation of
the Plan. The Plan Administrator, the Employer (and any person to whom it may delegate
any duty or power in connection with the administration of the Plan), and all persons
connected therewith may rely upon all tables, valuations, certificates, reports and opinions
furnished by any duly appointed actuary, accountant, (including Employees who are
actuaries or accountants), consultant, third party administration service provider, legal
counsel, or other specialist, and they shall be fully protected in respect to any action
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
taken, not taken, or permitted in good faith in reliance thereon. All actions so taken or
permitted shall be conclusive and binding as to all persons.
6.03 Several Fiduciary Liability
To the extent permitted by law, neither the Plan Administrator nor any other person shall
incur any liability for any acts or for failure to act except for this own willful misconduct
or willful breach of this Plan.
6.04 Compensation of Plan Administrator
Unless otherwise agreed to by the Employer, the Plan Administrator shall serve without
compensation for services rendered in such capacity, but all reasonable expenses incurred
in the performance of these duties shall be paid by the Employer.
6.05 Bonding
Unless otherwise determined by the Employer, or unless required by any Federal or State
law, the Plan Administrator shall not be required to give any bond or other security in any
jurisdiction in connection with the administration of this Plan.
6.06 Payment of Administrative Expenses
All reasonable expenses incurred in administering the Plan, including but not limited to
administrative fees and expenses owing to any third party administrative service provider,
actuary, consultant, accountant, attorney, specialist, or other person or organization that
may be employed by the Plan Administrator in connection with the administration
thereof, shall be paid by the Employer, provided, however that Participants shall bear the
monthly cost (if any) charged by a third party administrator for maintenance of their
Benefit Accounts.
6.07 Timeliness of Payments
Payments shall be made as soon as administratively feasible after the required forms and
documentation have been received by the Plan Administrator.
6.08 Annual Statements
The Plan Administrator shall furnish each Participant with an annual statement of his
medical and dental expense reimbursement account within ninety (90) days after the close
of each Plan Year.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
ARTICLE VII
CLAIMS PROCEDURE
7.01 Procedure if Benefits are Denied Under the Plan
Any Participant, Spouse or Dependent, or their duly authorized representative, may file a
claim for a plan benefit to which the claimant believes that he or she is entitled. Such a
claim must be in writing on a form provided by the Plan Administrator and delivered to
the Plan Administrator, in person or by mail, postage paid. Within thirty (30) days after
receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall send to the claimant, by mail, postage
prepaid, notice of the granting or denying, in whole or in part, of such claim, unless
special circumstances require an extension of time for processing the claim. In no event
may the extension exceed ninety (90) days from the end of the initial period. If such
extension is necessary, the claimant will be given a written notice to this effect prior to
the expiration of the initial 30 -day period. The Plan Administrator shall have full
discretion to deny or grant a claim in whole or in part. If notice of the denial of a claim is
not furnished in accordance with this Section, the claim shall be deemed denied and the
claimant shall be permitted to exercise his right to review pursuant to Sections 7.03 and
7.04.
7.02 Requirement for Written Notice of Claim Denial
The Plan Administrator shall provide, to every claimant who is denied a claim for
benefits, written notice setting forth in a manner calculated to be understood by the
claimant:
(a) The specific reason or reasons for the denial;
(b) Specific reference to pertinent Plan provisions on which the denial is based;
(c) A description of any additional material or information necessary for the claimant
to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material is necessary, and
(d) An explanation of the Plan's claim review procedure.
7.03 Right to Request Hearing on Benefit Denial
Within sixty (60) days after the receipt by a claimant of written notification of the denial
(in whole or in part) of the claim, a claimant or their duly authorized representative, upon
written application to the Plan Administrator, in person or by certified mail, postage
prepaid, may request a review of such denial, may review pertinent documents, and may
submit issues and comments in writing.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
7.04 Disposition of Disputed Claims
Upon its receipt of notice of a request for review, the Plan Administrator shall make a
prompt decision on the review. The decision on review shall be written in a manner
calculated to be understood by the claimant and shall include specific reasons for the
decision and specific references to the pertinent plan provisions on which the decision is
based. The decision on review shall be made not later than sixty (60) days after the Plan
Administrator's receipt of a request for a review, unless special circumstances require an
extension of time for processing, in which case a decision shall be rendered not later than
one hundred - twenty (120) days after receipt of a request for review. If an extension is
necessary, the claimant shall be given written notice of the extension prior to the
expiration of the initial sixty (60) day period. If notice of the decision on the review is
not furnished in accordance with this Section, the claim shall be deemed denied and the
claimant shall be permitted to exercise his right to legal remedy pursuant to Section 7.05.
7.05 Preservation of Other Remedies
After exhaustion of the claims procedures provided under this Plan, nothing shall prevent
any person from pursuing any other legal or equitable remedy otherwise available.
ARTICLE VIII
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN
8.01 Permanency
While the Employer fully expects that this Plan will continue indefinitely, due to
unforeseen, future business contingencies, permanency of the Plan will be subject to the
Employer's right to amend or terminate the Plan, as provided in Sections 8.02 and 8.03,
below.
8.02 Employer's Right to Amend
The Employer reserves the right to amend the Plan at any time and from time -to -time, and
retroactively if deemed necessary or appropriate to meet the requirements of the Code, or
any similar provisions of subsequent revenue or other laws, or the rules and regulations in
effect under any of such laws or to conform with governmental regulations or other
policies, to modify or amend in whole or in part any or all of the provisions of the Plan or
as deemed appropriate by the Employer, subject to requirements to negotiate with
designated union representatives.
8.03 Employer's Right to Terminate
The Employer reserves the right to discontinue or terminate the Plan at any time without
prejudice.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
ARTICLE IX
GENERAL PROVISIONS
9.01 No Employment Rights Conferred
Neither this Plan nor any action taken with respect to it shall confer upon any person the
right to be continued in the employment of the Employer.
9.02 Payments to Beneficiary
Any benefits otherwise payable to a Participant following the date of death of such
Participant shall be paid as outlined in the Employer's VantageCare Retiree Health
Savings Plan Adoption Agreement.
9.03 Nonalienation of Benefits
No benefit under the Plan shall be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale,
transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance or charge, and any attempt to do so shall be
void. No benefit under the Plan shall in any manner be liable for or subject to the debts,
contracts, liabilities, engagements or torts of any person. If any person entitled to benefits
under the Plan becomes bankrupt or attempts to anticipate, alienate, sell, transfer, assign,
pledge, encumber or charge any benefit under the Plan, or if any attempt is made to
subject any such benefit to the debts, contracts, liabilities, engagements or torts of the
person entitled to any such benefit, except as specifically provided in the Plan, then such
benefit shall cease and terminate in the discretion of the Plan Administrator, and it may
hold or apply the same or any part thereof to the benefit of any dependent or beneficiary
of such person, in such manner and proportion as the Plan Administrator may deem
proper.
9.04 Mental or Physical Incompetency
If the Plan Administrator determines that any person entitled to payments under the Plan
is incompetent by reason of physical or mental disability, the Plan Administrator may
cause all payments thereafter becoming due to such person to be made to any other person
on the Participant's behalf, without responsibility to follow the application of amounts so
paid. Payments made pursuant to this Section shall completely discharge the Plan
Administrator and the Employer.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
9.05 Inability to Locate Payee
If the Plan Administrator is unable to make payment to any Participant or other person to
whom a payment is due under the Plan because the Plan Administrator cannot ascertain
the identity or whereabouts of such Participant or other person after reasonable efforts
have been made to identify or locate such person (including a notice of the payment so
due mailed to the last Imown address of such Participant or other person as shown on the
records of the Employer), such payment and all subsequent payments otherwise due to
such Participant or other person shall be escheated under the laws of the State of the last
known address of the Participant or other persons eligible for benefits.
9.06 Requirement of Proper Forms
All communication in connection with the Plan made by a Participant shall become
effective only when duly executed on forms provided by and filed with the Plan
Administrator.
9.07 Source of Payments
The Employer shall be the sole source of benefits under the Plan. No Employee or
beneficiary shall have any right to, or interest in, any assets of the Employer upon
termination of employment or otherwise, except as provided from time to time under the
Plan, and then only to the extent of the benefits payable under the Plan to such Employee
or beneficiary.
9.08 Tax Effects
Neither the Employer nor the Plan Administrator makes any warranty or other
representation as to whether any payments received by a Participant, Spouse or
Dependent hereunder will be treated as includible in gross income for federal or state
income tax purposes.
9.09 Multiple Functions
Any person or group of persons may serve in more than one fiduciary capacity with
respect to the Plan.
9.10 Headings
The Article and Section headings contained herein are for convenience of reference only,
and shall not be construed as defining or limiting the matter contained thereunder.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
9.11 Applicable Laws
The provisions of the Plan shall be construed, administered and enforced according to the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
9.12 Severability
Should any part of this plan subsequently be invalidated by a court of competent
jurisdiction, the remainder thereof shall be given effect to the maximum extent possible.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have executed this revised Plan Agreement effective 11-
14-05.
(Employer)
C
ATTEST
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
DECLARATION OF TRUST OF THE
City of Maplewood
INTEGRAL PART TRUST
Declaration of Trust made as of the 29th day of June, 2002, by the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota a municipal corporation, serving as Trustee (hereinafter
referred to as the "Employer ").
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Employer is a political subdivision of the State of
Minnesota exempt from federal income tax under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986: and
WHEREAS, the Employer provides for the security and welfare of its
eligible employees (hereinafter referred to as "Participants "), their Spouses
and Dependents by the maintenance of one or more post- retirement welfare
benefit plans, programs or arrangements which provide for life, sickness,
medical, disability, severance and other similar benefits through insurance
and self- funded reimbursement plans (collectively the "Plan "); and
WHEREAS, it is an essential function and integral part of the exempt
activities of the Employer to assist Participants, their Spouses and
Dependents by making contributions to and accumulating assets in the trust, a
segregated fund, for post- retirement welfare benefits under the plan; and
WHEREAS, the authority to conduct the general operation and
administration of the Plan is vested in the Employer or its designee, who has
the authority and shall be subject to the duties with respect to the trust
specified in the Declaration of Trust; and
WHEREAS, the Employer wishes to establish this trust to hold assets and
income of the Plan for the exclusive benefit of Plan Participants, their
Spouses and Dependents; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do hereby establish this trust, to be
known as the Declaration of Trust of the City of Maplewood Integral Part Trust
(hereinafter referred to as the "Trust "), and agree that the following
constitute the Declaration of Trust (hereinafter referred to as the
"Declaration "):
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
1.1 Definitions. For the purposes of this Declaration, the following terms shall have the
respective meanings set forth below unless otherwise expressly provided.
(a) "Account" means the individual recordlceeping account maintained under the Plan
to record the interest of a Participant in the Plan in accordance with section 7.3.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
(b) "Account Transfer" means a transfer of the Participant's Account upon his or her
death to be used for the payment of benefits for the Participant's Spouse and
Dependents.
(c) "Administrator" means the Employer. The Employer may contract for such
administrative services as are necessary to implement the Plan.
(d) `Beneficiary" means the Spouse and eligible Dependents, who will receive any
benefits payable hereunder in the event of the Participant's death.
(e) "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
(f) "Covered Employment Classification" means the group or groups of Participants
eligible to have contributions to this Plan made on their behalf, as specified by the
Employer.
(g) "Dependent "and "Eligible Dependent" means an individual who is a person
described in Code Section 152(a).
(h) "Investment Fund" means any separate investment option or vehicle selected by
the Employer in which all or a portion of the Trust assets may be separately
invested as herein provided. The Trustee shall not be required to select any
Investment Fund.
(i) "Nonforfeitable Interest" means the interest of the Participant or the Participant's
Spouse or eligible Dependent (whichever is applicable) in the percentage of
Participant's Employer's contribution which has vested pursuant to the vesting
schedule specified in the Employer's Plan.
(j) "Spouse" means the Participant's lawful spouse as determined under the laws of
the state in which the Participant has his primary place of residence.
(k) "Trust" means the trust established by this Declaration.
(1) "Trustee" means the person or persons appointed by the Employer to serve in that
capacity.
ARTICLE II
ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUST
2.1 The Trust is hereby established as of the date set forth above for the exclusive benefit of
Participants, their Spouses and eligible Dependents.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
ARTICLE III
CONSTRUCTION
3.1 This Trust and its validity, construction and effect shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
3.2 Pronouns and other similar words used herein in the masculine gender shall be read as the
feminine gender where appropriate, and the singular form of words shall be read as the
plural where appropriate.
3.3 If any provision of this Trust shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, such
determination shall not affect the remaining provisions, and such provisions shall be
construed to effectuate the purpose of this Trust.
ARTICLE IV
BENEFITS
4.1 Benefits. This Trust may provide benefits to the Participant, the Participant's Spouse and
eligible Dependents pursuant to the terms of the Plan.
4.2 Form of Benefits. This Trust may reimburse the Participant, his /her Spouse or eligible
Dependents for insurance premiums or other payments expended for permissible benefits
described under the Plan. This trust may reimburse the Employer, or the Administrator
for insurance premiums.
ARTICLE V
GENERAL DUTIES
5.1 It shall be the duty of the Trustee to hold title to assets held in respect of the Plan in the
Trustee's name as directed by the Employer or its designees in writing. The Trustee shall
not be under any duty to compute the amount of contributions to be paid by the Employer
or to take any steps to collect such amounts as may be due to be held in trust under the
Plan. The Trustee shall not be responsible for the custody, investment, safekeeping or
disposition of any assets comprising the Trust, to the extent such functions are performed
by the Employer or the Administrator, or both.
5.2 It shall be the duty of the Employer, subject to the provisions of the Plan, to pay over to
the Administrator, or other person or entity designated hereunder from time to time, the
Employer's contributions under the Plan and to inform the Administrator in writing as to
the identity and value of the assets titled in the Trustee's name hereunder and to keep
accurate books and records with respect to participants of the Plan.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
ARTICLE VI
INVESTMENTS
6.1 The Employer may appoint one or more investment managers to manage and control all
or part of the assets of the Trust.
6.2 The Trustee shall not have any discretion or authority with regard to the investment of the
Trust and shall act solely as a directed Trustee of the assets of which it holds title. To the
extent directed by the Employer (or Participants, their Spouse and eligible Dependents to
the extent provided herein) the Trustee is authorized and empowered with the following
powers, rights and duties, each of which the Trustee shall exercise in a nondiscretionary
manner:
(a) To cause stocks, bonds, securities, or other investments to be registered in its
name as Trustee or in the name of a nominee, or to take and keep the same
unregistered;
(b) To employ such agents and legal counsel as it deems advisable or proper in
connection with its duties and to pay such agents and legal counsel a reasonable
fee. The Trustee shall not be liable for the acts of such agents and counsel or for
the acts done in good faith and in reliance upon the advice of such agents and
legal counsel, provided it has used reasonable care in selecting such agents and
legal counsel;
(c) To exercise where applicable and appropriate any rights of ownership in any
contracts of insurance in which any part of the Trust may be invested and to pay
the premiums thereon; and
(d) At the direction of the Employer (or Participants, their Spouses, their Dependents,
or the investment manager, as the case may be) to sell, write options on, convey or
transfer, invest and reinvest any part thereof in each and every kind of property,
whether real, personal or mixed, tangible or intangible, whether income or non-
income producing and wherever situated, including but not limited to, time
deposits (including time deposits in the Trustee or its affiliates, or any successor
thereto, if the deposits bear a reasonable rate of interest), shares of common and
preferred stock, mortgages, bonds, leases, notes, debentures, equipment or
collateral trust certificates, rights, warrants, convertible or exchangeable securities
and other corporate, individual or government securities or obligations, annuity,
retirement or other insurance contracts, mutual funds (including funds for which
the Trustee or its affiliates serve as investment advisor, custodian or in a similar or
related capacity), or in units of any other common, collective or commingled trust
fund.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
6.3 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the assets of the Plan shall be held by
the Trustee as titleholder only. Persons holding custody or possession of assets titled to
the Trust shall include the Employer, the Administrator, the investment manager, and any
agents and subagents, but not the Trustee (except in cases in which the Employer is the
Trustee). The Trustee shall not be responsible or liable for any loss or expense which
may arise from or result from compliance with any direction from the Employer, the
Administrator, the investment manager or such agents to take title to any assets nor shall
the Trustee be responsible or liable for any loss or expense which may result from the
Trustee's refusal or failure to comply with any direction to hold title, except if the same
shall involve or result from the Trustee's negligence or intentional misconduct. The
Trustee may refuse to comply with any direction from the Employer, the Administrator,
the investment manager, or such agents in the event that the Trustee, in its sole and
absolute discretion, deems such direction illegal.
6.4 The Employer hereby indemnifies and holds the Trustee harmless from any and all
actions, claims, demands, liabilities, losses, damages or reasonable expenses of
whatsoever land and nature in connection with or arising out of (i) any action taken or
omitted in good faith by the Trustee in accordance with the directions of the Employer or
it agents and subagents hereunder, or (ii) any disbursements of any part of the Trust made
by the Trustee in accordance with the directions of the Employer, or (iii) any action taken
by or omitted in good faith by the Trustee with respect to an investment managed by an
investment manager in accordance with any direction of the investment manager or any
inaction with respect to any such investment in the absence of directions from the
investment manager. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Employer shall
have no responsibility to the Trustee under the foregoing indemnification if the Trustee
fails negligently, intentionally or recklessly to perform any of the duties undertaken by it
under the provisions of this Trust.
6.5 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Employer or, if so designated by the
Employer, the Administrator and the investment manager or another agent of the
Employer, will be responsible for valuing all assets so acquired for all purposes of the
Trust and of holding, investing, trading and disposing of the same. The Employer will
indemnify and hold the Trustee harmless against any and all claims, actions, demands,
liabilities, losses, damages, or expenses of whatsoever kind and nature, which arise from
or are related to any use of such valuation by the Trustee or holding, trading, or
disposition of such assets.
6.6 The Trustee shall and hereby does indemnify and hold harmless the Employer from any
and all actions, claims, demands, liabilities, losses, damages and reasonable expenses of
whatsoever land and nature in connection with or arising out of (a) the Trustee's failure to
follow the directions of the Employer, the Administrator, the investment manager, or
agents thereof, except as permitted by the last sentence of Section 6.3 above; (b) any
disbursements made without the direction of the Employer, the Administrator, the
investment manager or agents thereof, and (c) the Trustee's negligence, willful
misconduct, or recklessness with respect to the Trustee's duties under this Declaration.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
ARTICLE VII
CONTRIBUTIONS
7.1 Employer Contributions. The Employer shall contribute to the Trust such amounts as
specified in the Plan or by resolution.
7.2 Accrued Leave and Personal Holiday. Contributions up to an amount equal to the value
of accrued sick leave, vacation leave, annual leave and/or personal holidays are permitted
under the Plan. The Employer's Plan must provide a formula for determining the value
of the Participant's contribution of accrued leave. The Employer's Plan must contain a
forfeiture provision that will prevent Participants from receiving the accrued leave in cash
in lieu of a contribution to the Trust.
7.3 Accounts. Employer contributions and contributions of accrued sick leave or vacation
leave, or both, all investment income and realized and unrealized gains and losses, and
forfeitures allocable thereto will be deposited into an Account in the name of the
Participant for the exclusive benefit of the Participant, his Spouse or eligible Dependents.
The assets in each Participant's Account may be invested in Investment Funds as
directed by the Participant from among the Investment Funds selected by the Employer.
7.4 Receipt of Contributions. The Employer or, if so designated by the Employer, the
Administrator or investment manager or another agent of the Employer, shall receive all
contributions paid or delivered to it hereunder and shall hold, invest, reinvest and
administer such contributions pursuant to this Declaration, without distinction between
principal and income. The Trustee shall not be responsible for the calculation or
collection of any contribution under the Plan, but shall hold title to property received in
respect of the Plan in the Trustee's name as directed by the Employer or its designee
pursuant to this Declaration.
7.5 No amount in any Account maintained under this Trust shall be subject to transfer,
assignment, or alienation, whether voluntary or involuntary, in favor of any creditor,
transferee, or assignee of the Employer, the Trustee, any Participant, his Spouse, or
eligible Dependent.
7.6 Upon the satisfaction of all liabilities under the Plan to provide such benefits, any amount
of Employer contributions, plus accrued earnings thereon, remaining in such separate
Accounts must, under the terms of the Plan, be returned to the Employer.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
ARTICLE VIII
OTHER PLANS
8.1 If the Employer hereafter adopts one or more other plans providing life, sickness,
accident, medical, disability, severance, or other benefits and designates the Trust hereby
created as part of such other plan, the Employer or, if so designated by the Employer, the
Administrator or an investment manager or another agent of the Employer shall, subject
to the terms of this Declaration, accept and hold hereunder contributions to such other
plans. In that event (a) the Employer or, if so designated by the Employer, the
Administrator or an investment manager or another agent of the Employer, may
commingle for investment purposes the contributions received under such other plan or
plans with the contributions previously received by the Trust, but the books and records
of the Employer or, if so designated by the Employer, the Administrator or an investment
manager or another agent of the Employer, shall at all times show the portion of the Trust
Fund allocable to each plan; (b) the term "Plan" as used herein shall be deemed to refer
separately to each other plan; and (c) the term "Employer" as used herein shall be deemed
to refer to the person or group of persons which have been designated by the terms of
such other plans as having the authority to control and manage the operation and
administration of such other plan.
ARTICLE IX
DISBURSEMENTS AND EXPENSES
9.1 The Employer or its designee shall make such payments from the Trust at such time to
such persons and in such amounts as shall be authorized by the provisions of the Plan
provided, however, that no payment shall be made, either during the existence of or upon
the discontinuance of the Plan (subject to Section 7.6), which would cause any part of the
Trust to be used for or diverted to purposes other than the exclusive benefit of the
Participants, their Spouses and eligible Dependents pursuant to the provisions of the Plan.
9.2 All payments of benefits under the Plan shall be made exclusively from the assets of the
Accounts of the Participants to whom or to whose Spouse or eligible Dependents such
payments are to be made, and no person shall be entitled to look to any other source for
such payments.
9.3 The Employer, Trustee and Administrator may be reimbursed for expenses reasonably
incurred by them in the administration of the Trust. All such expenses, including,
without limitation, reasonable fees of accountants and legal counsel to the extent not
otherwise reimbursed, shall constitute a charge against and shall be paid from the Trust
upon the direction of the Employer.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
ARTICLE X
ACCOUNTING
10.1 The Trustee shall not be required to keep accounts of the investments, receipts,
disbursements, and other transactions of the Trust, except as necessary to perform its title -
holding function hereunder. All accounts, books, and records relating thereto shall be
maintained by the Employer or its designee.
10.2 As promptly as possible following the close of each year, the Trustee shall file with the
Employer a written account setting forth assets titled to the Trust as reported to the
Trustee by the Employer or its designee.
ARTICLE XI
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
11.1 Neither the Trustee nor any affiliate thereof shall be required to give any bond or to
qualify before, be appointed by, or account to any court of law in the exercise of its
powers hereunder.
11.2 No person transferring title or receiving a transfer of title from the Trustee shall be
obligated to look to the propriety of the acts of the Trustee in connection therewith.
11.3 The Employer may engage the Trustee as its agent in the performance of any duties
required of the Employer under the Plan, but such agency shall not be deemed to increase
the responsibility or liability of the Trustee under this Declaration.
11.4 The Employer shall have the right at all reasonable times during the term of this
Declaration and for three (3) years after the termination of this Declaration to examine,
audit, inspect, review, extract information from, and copy all books, records, accounts,
and other documents of the Trustee relating to this Declaration and the Trustees'
performance hereunder.
ARTICLE XII
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
12.1 The Employer reserves the right to alter, amend, or (subject to Section 9.1) terminate this
Declaration at any time for any reason without the consent of the Trustee or any other
person, provided that no amendment affecting the rights, duties, or responsibilities of the
Trustee shall be adopted without the exception of the Trustee to the amendment. Any
such amendment shall become effective as of the date provided in the amendment, if
requiring the Trustee's execution, or on delivery of the amendment to the Trustee, if the
Trustee's execution is not required.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
12.2 Upon termination of this Declaration and upon the satisfaction of all liabilities under the
Plan to provide such benefits, any amount of Employer contributions, plus accrued
earnings thereon, remaining in such separate Accounts must, under the terms of the Plan,
be returned to the Employer.
ARTICLE XIII
SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES
13.1 The Employer reserves the right to discharge the Trustee for any or no reason, at any time
by giving ninety (90) days' advance written notice.
13.2 The Trustee reserves the right to resign at any time by giving ninety (90) days' advance
written notice to the Employer.
13.3 In the event of discharge or resignation of the Trustee, the Employer may appoint a
successor Trustee who shall succeed to all rights, duties, and responsibilities of the
former Trustee under this Declaration, and the terminated Trustee shall be deemed
discharged of all duties under this Declaration and responsibilities for the Trust.
ARTICLE XIV
LIMITED EFFECT OF PLAN AND TRUST
14.1 Neither the establishment of the Plan and the Trust or any modification thereof, the
creation of any fund or account, nor the payment of any benefits, shall be construed as
giving to any person covered under the Plan or other person any legal or equitable right
against the Trustee, the Administrator, the Employer or any officer or employee thereof,
except as may otherwise be expressly provided in the Plan or in this Declaration.
ARTICLE XV
PROTECTIVE CLAUSE
15.1 Neither the Administrator, the Employer, nor the Trustee shall be responsible for the
validity of any contract of insurance or other arrangement maintained in connection with
the Plan, or for the failure on the part of the insurer or provider to make payments
provided by such contract, or for the action of any person which may delay payment or
render a contract void or unenforceable in whole or part.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Maplewood as the Employer and Trustee have
executed this amended Declaration by their respective duly authorized officers, effective
November 14, 2005.
VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AS
EMPLOYER AND TRUSTEE:
C
Mayor
C
City Manager
C
City Clerk
Agenda Item G12
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Steve Lukin, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Budget Transfer from Contingency Fund to Fire Fund
DATE: November 7, 2005
INTRODUCTION
The heating and air conditioning unit at station three is over 20 years old. It was in our plan to be replaced
in 2007. Unfortunately, the unit has rusted out to the point where water continuously leaks into the station
which has caused considerable damage to the ceiling tiles, insulation and part of the venting system.
Therefore, we need to make an emergency replacement before the snow comes.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the City Council approve the budget transfer of $13,600 from the contingency
fund to the fire fund to cover the expense of the emergency replacement of the new heating /ac
unit at station three.
F, 914N, rOUT-Mblu, qJ
DATE: November 8. 2005 for the November 14 CAME=
recreation department. The budget proposes 12 monthly city newsletters and three parks and
recreation brochures.
Due 1O budget limitations, our department proposed to reduce the publication Qf one city newsletter tO
stay within the city budget dollars. After reviewing the importance Bf the content for the December
newsletter, it was critical that the newsletter be published as initially proposed.
The cost for the additional newsletter is$5.O41 8S outlined in the enclosed invoice from Pauline
Staples.
Staff recommends that the city contingency aCcOV8tbmusedtQfQMdU18finGJCitynemxsQUblkc@tk}nin
the amount Of$6.Q41r
kph\cilymews budgetmenn
cnc|nnom
I
Maplewood Community Center
210,1 White Bear Avenue
M4 ewood, Minnesota 55109
Invoice
f ire:
Richard Fursman
City Manager
Invoice 4:
Date: 10-31-2005
c"S"Mor 1111;
Fli7�fi 'i — , ", � ,I= �-ll - �-mk�LE�
1 W31
Pauline
1 Postage for City News December
2380.00
::1380.00
2281,00
-380,00
Sobtotal --
Tax
I;n =.11 IrTm
M
Agenda Item G14
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
FROM: Sherrie Le
Human Resource Director
RE: Group Insurance Contracts
DATE: November 3, 2005
We recently went through our annual renewal process for employee insurance benefits. We dic
not go through the formal bid process this year. We received and reviewed renewal proposals
from all other existing carriers and requested a proposal for a High Deductible Health Plan (also
referred to as a Consumer - Driven Health Plan). The Insurance Labor - Management Committee
met and discussed providers, rates, options and benefits. After much discussion and
negotiation by our insurance agents with various providers, the LMC proposed the following
effective January 1, 2006:
Health Insurance:
We propose to continue offering the Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota AWARE -PPO
plan. Most benefits in this plan did not change. The changes that did occur were an increase to
lifetime benefits and one minor positive change in the area of pharmacy benefits.
After considerable negotiations by our insurance agent on our behalf, they agreed to reduce
their rates considerably below their initial proposal. The rates will increase by 18.4% over 2005
rates for the AWARE -PPO plan. The original increase was 28.4 %.
The Insurance LMC also proposes to add a second (voluntary) health insurance option for
employees beginning January 1, 2006. This plan, also through Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
MN, is a high deductible health plan with a $2000 per participant deductible and a maximum out -
of- pocket of $2000 for singles and $4000 for family coverage. The rates for this plan are
significantly lower; in fact, the rates are lower than are insurance rates were in 2002.
Along with this HDHP, the City will be adopting an HRA (Health Reimbursement Arrangement)
allowed under the federal tax code to provide a tax -free account for employees to use for health
expenses. The HRA will be funded by the City using savings from the difference in premiums
between the two plans. For the first year, the City plans to put 100% of the savings into an
account for each employee who opts for the HDHP. On year two of being in the plan, the
employee would receive a city contribution of 75% of the savings and on year three and
thereafter, employees who have the HDHP will receive 50% of the savings in their account.
This plan provides an opportunity for employees who have lower claims costs to save money for
future health expenses, including retiree health insurance. It also provides a vehicle for the City
to save money. The City currently pays 100% of all health insurance premiums - including
annual increases each year - for employees with single coverage and about 75% of the
premiums for family coverage. With the enormous premium increases over the past several
years, we have to look at ways to do what we can to hold costs down.
One of the goals of this type of plan is to help employees become more savvy consumers of
healthcare. This should help decrease claims costs over time which is directly tied to our
premiums increases each year.
Dental Insurance:
We have a two -year agreement with MetLife Dental with no rate increase for 2006. Therefore,
there is no change in dental premiums or benefits.
Long -term Care:
No change to provider or rates. CNA has added an additional benefit level option for 2006.
Long -term and Short -term Disability:
We propose to continue our long- and short -term disability insurance with Union Security
Insurance Company (formerly Assurant and before that Fortis) through a pool affiliated with the
League of Minnesota Cities. The rates for long -term disability will increase 25% from $.28 to
$.35 per $100 of covered monthly payroll and will be guaranteed for two years. The rates in
2001 were $.40 per $100.
Short -term disability rates will increase 5.88% but are still lower than they were in 2003 when we
were with Unum.
Life Insurance:
We are proposing to continue with Minnesota Life through a pool affiliated with the League of
MN Cities. The rate for basic life insurance will increase by $.01 per $1000 coverage. There will
be no increase to optional employee supplemental life, spouse life or dependent life rates.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Insurance Labor - Management Committee
recommendations to be effective January 1, 2006.
Agenda Item G15
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
FROM: Sherrie Le
Human Resource Director
RE: Health -Care Savings Plan Document
DATE: November 7, 2005
BACKGROUND
In an effort to control the costs of healthcare, we are adding a Consumer Driven Health Plan
(High Deductible Health Plan with a Health Reimbursement Account) as a second health
insurance option for our employees. Employees who are eligible for health insurance will be able
to select this plan at their option.
Once the Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) is adopted, the City will be able to fund
employee accounts with pre -tax money. The money will go into a safe investment vehicle that
guarantees at least 3% interest (interest is earned tax - free). The money can then be withdrawn
tax -free from the account by the participant through a simple reimbursement process.
The savings from employees selecting this lower cost plan will be used to fund the HRA
accounts for each employee who selects the High Deductible Health Plan. The first year an
employee is covered by this plan, the City will put 100% of the savings into the account. The
second year, the City will put 75% of the savings in and the third year and thereafter, the City will
put 50% of the savings into the account. Putting more money in the first two years helps to build
a reserve in case an employee has a bad year.
Employees can then use that money (on a reimbursement basis) to pay for their medical
expenses. Any unused money at year -end carries over to the next year and can be used for
future medical expenses including retiree health insurance. Once the money is in the account, it
is the employee's money to use for their expenses.
Although this program will not benefit everyone, for those with lower claims cost, this program
should help save money for future medical expenses and at the same time help the City save
money on health insurance premiums.
National Insurance Services (NIS) - and through them ING Annuity Service Center, and
MidAmerica Administrative and Retirement Solutions, Inc. - was selected to manage and
administer the HRA because they were the best option of three. The other options considered
were America's VEBA and Passport Benefit Solutions. NIS provided a reasonable rate of
interest with a 3% guaranteed rate of return. Although NIS doesn't have some of the "extras" the
two other firms have, their cost is considerably lower.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Health -Care Savings Plan document to
establish the HRA and to authorize City staff to execute the appropriate legal and administrative
agreements with the NIS, ING, and MidAmerica to manage and administer the HRA.
Health Care Savings Plan Document
FOR
City of Maplewood
Introduction
This Health Care Savings Plan, hereinafter referred to as the Plan, is sponsored by the
City of Maplewood hereinafter referred to as the Employer, and is effective on
January 1, 2006 The Plan enables Participants and their dependents to be reimbursed tax -free for
eligible medical and dental expenses and health insurance premiums. Contributions to this Plan shall
be made by the Employer and irrevocably credited to Participants' accounts. Claims for
reimbursement shall be processed and reimbursements paid out on a tax -free basis for medical
expenses in accordance with Internal Revenue Service Guidelines for Health Reimbursement
Agreements, IRS Publication 502, Internal Revenue Code Sections 213(d), 105 and 106 as described
in Revenue Ruling 2002 -41 and Notice 2002 -45.
Participation
Participation in this Plan is mandatory for all Employees of the class or classes set forth by the
Employer in the Plan Adoption Agreement.
Funding
All funds for the Plan shall come exclusively from the Employer and shall constitute either a
specified dollar amount and/or a specific percentage of Employees' retirement pay as the Employer
shall from time to time determine. The amount or percentage to be determined by the Employer shall
be subject to, and not in contravention of, the Employer's obligations to its Employees. All funds in
the Plan belong to the individual Participants as allocated to their accounts. Once funds are allocated
to the Participants' accounts, the Employer relinquishes all right, title, control, and interest to such
funds.
Plan Investments
The Employer realizes and acknowledges that the funds in this Plan are for the exclusive purpose of
reimbursing Plan Participants for medical expenses. The Employer has determined that, given the
nature of the funds in the Plan and their intended usage, it would be inappropriate to subject them to
speculative investments that would put the principal at risk Therefore, the Employer has determined
that this Plan shall hold its funds in a fixed annuity account that earns a reasonable rate of return with
a guarantee minimum rate of return of not less than three percent (3 %). The account shall be with a
major insurance company, rated at least A+ by A.M. Best, AA+ by Standard & Poor's, and Aa2 by
Moody's. The insurance company shall be designated in the Adoption Agreement.
Rev. 6.15.04 -3-
Plan Administrator
The Employer designates as the initial Plan Administrator the entity named in the Adoption
Agreement. The initial Plan Administrator shall serve as Plan Administrator until such time as a
new Plan Administrator is appointed.
Administrative Fees
There shall be no administrative charges assessed against the Employer. Participants may be charged
a reimbursement- processing fee of $5.00 for every month they receive a disbursement, with a
maximum annual reimbursement- processing fee of $30.00. The maximum annual reimbursement -
processing fee will be $60.00 for those participants electing to reimburse twice per month. This
procedure will allow Participants to control their costs. There shall not be any charges to
Participants or their dependents unless a disbursement is made.
Administration
1. Health reimbursement requests may be made monthly and must be for a minimum of $100.
Participants are eligible to submit for reimbursement from their funded account upon becoming
eligible for the Health Care Savings Plan and first exhausting their section 125 plan. Participants are
expected to reimburse all eligible expenditures in a timely manner and are not allowed to submit
claims multiple times or submit receipts that have already been submitted through a previous tax
advantaged plan such as a Section 125 plan. Reimbursement timeframes will be subject to IRS
Revenue Rulings.
2. Participants are entitled to request reimbursements from their accounts as soon as the accounts
are funded by the Employer, but only for medical expenses incurred subsequent to the effective date
of this Plan. Pursuant to IRS Guidelines, hardship withdrawals or loans are not permitted under this
Plan and Plan funds may only be used to reimburse Participants and their dependents for medical
expenses.
3. In order to receive reimbursement for qualified expenses, Participants shall provide the Plan
Administrator with whatever information is reasonably required. This Plan shall not and cannot
reimburse for any claims other than those allowed under the Internal Revenue Code and as described
in IRS Publication 502.
4. When a request is approved it shall be scheduled for disbursement. Disbursements shall be made
under the following timelines: If eligible receipts are received by the plan administrator anytime
between the 1 st through the 15 of any given month, they will be issued disbursement by the 30 of
that same month. If eligible receipts are received by the plan administrator anytime between the 16
through the 30 /31` of any given month, they will be issued disbursement by the 15 of the
following month.
5. Decisions of the Plan Administrator shall be final on the issue of eligible expenditures and such
decisions shall be based on IRS Publication 502 as interpreted by the IRS or court rulings or
directives concerning the deductibility of medical expenses for Federal Income Tax purposes, which
interpretations shall be controlling for purposes of determining reimbursement eligibility under this
Plan.
Rev. 6.15.04 -4-
6. Other than establishing this Plan and providing funding for the Plan, the Employer does not
assume any responsibility for any aspect of any Participant's healthcare. Participant questions shall
be directed to the Plan Administrator.
7. Each Participant shall be notified by the Plan Administrator of his or her account balance at the
time a deposit is made to his or her account. The Plan Administrator shall provide each Participant
with a quarterly statement setting forth the Participant's account balance and earnings and
disbursements for the quarter. Additionally, the Plan Administrator shall provide a Participant with a
statement of account balance in conjunction with each reimbursement distribution.
8. Funds in a Participant's account at the end of each year shall be rolled into the following year.
9. Reimbursement is available for the Participant and the Participant's tax dependants as defined in
Internal Revenue Code Section 152. Submission of a request for reimbursement on behalf of
someone other than the Participant shall be deemed a representation by the Participant that the
request for reimbursement is made on behalf of a qualified dependant.
Death Benefit
If a Participant dies prior to exhausting his account balance, the Participant's surviving spouse and/or
dependents are eligible to be reimbursed for their qualified medical expenses under this Plan
Document until the account balance is exhausted. If a balance remains after the death of the spouse
and all dependents, all remaining funds will be forfeited. These forfeited funds will revert back to
the employer. Upon forfeiture to the employer, the employer will then equally redistribute forfeited
funds among the existing plan Participants remaining in the plan at the time of receiving such
forfeited funds from the plan administrator. Additional reasonable administrative fees may be
charged in connection with any tax reporting requirements and deducted from the account.
Plan Amendments
The Employer has the authority to amend this Plan at any time, in whole or in part. Plan Participants
will be notified of any Plan changes. Any amendment to the Plan shall not adversely affect the rights
of existing Participants. However, changes imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, either by law
change, regulations, or rulings, will be effective immediately and without notice and may affect
current Participants.
Involuntary Access to Funds
Funds in a Participant's Plan account are not assignable by a Participant, either in law or in equity, or
subject to estate tax, or to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or any other legal processes.
Plan Termination
In the event the Employer elects to terminate this Plan, amounts credited to Participants' accounts
will remain in the Participants' accounts and Participants will continue to utilize their accounts as set
out in this Plan Document until their accounts are exhausted.
Rev. 6.15.04 -5-
HIPAA Compliance
1. Disclosure of Summary Health Information to the Employer
In accordance with the Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information
(the "Privacy Standards ") issued and pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996, as amended ( "HIPAA "), the Plan may disclose Summary Health Information to the
Employer, if the Employer requests the Summary Health Information for the purpose of (a) obtaining
premium bids from health plans for providing health insurance coverage under this Plan or (b)
modifying, amending or terminating the Plan.
"Summary Health Information" may be individually identifiable health information and it
summarizes the claims history, claims expenses or the type of claims experienced by individuals in
the Plan, but it excludes all identifiers that must be removed for the information to be de- identified,
except that it may contain geographic information to the extent that it is aggregated by five -digit zip
code.
2. Disclosure of Protected Health Information ( "PHI ") to the Employer for Plan
Administration Purposes
In order that the Employer may receive and use a Participant's individually identifiable
health information or PHI for "Plan Administration" purposes, the Employer agrees to:
a. Not use or further disclose PHI other than as permitted or required by the Plan
Documents or as Required by Law (as defined in the Privacy Standards);
b. Ensure that any agents, including a subcontractor, to whom the Employer provides
PHI received from the Plan agree to the same restrictions and conditions that apply to
the Employer with respect to such PHI;
C. Not use or disclose PHI for employment- related actions and decisions or in
connection with any other benefit or employee benefit plan of the Employer, except
pursuant to an authorization which meets the requirements of the Privacy Standards;
d. Report to the Plan any PHI use or disclosure that is inconsistent with the uses or
disclosures provided for of which the Employer becomes aware;
e. Make available PHI in accordance with Section 164.524 of the Privacy Standards (45
CFR 164.524);
f. Make available PHI for amendment and incorporate any amendments to PHI in
accordance with Section 164.526 of the Privacy Standards (45 CFR 164.526);
g. Make available the information required to provide an accounting of disclosures in
accordance with Section 164.528 of the Privacy Standards (45 CFR 164.528);
Rev. 6.15.04 -6-
h. Make its internal practices, books and records relating to the use and disclosure of
PHI received from the Plan available to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services ( "HHS "), or any other officer or employee of HHS to
whom the authority involved has been delegated, for purposes of determining
compliance by the Plan with Part 164, Subpart E, of the Privacy Standards (45 CFR
164.500 et seq);
If feasible, return or destroy all PHI received from the Plan that the Employer still
maintains in any form and retain no copies of such PHI when no longer needed for
the purpose for which disclosure was made, except that, if such return or destruction
is not feasible, limit further uses and disclosures to those purposes that make the
return or destruction of the PHI infeasible; and
j. Ensure that adequate separation between the Plan and the Employer, as required in
Section 164.504(i)(2)(iii) of the Privacy Standards (45 CFR 164.504(f)(2)(iii)), is
established as follows:
The following employees, or classes of employees, or other persons under
control of the Employer, shall be given access to the PHI to be disclosed:
High Deductible Medical Plan Participants and former participants
with remaining HRA account balances
Human Resource & Finance Department staff for administrative
purposes only
ii. The access to and use of PHI by the individuals described in subsection (i)
above shall be restricted to the Plan Administration functions that the
Employer performs for the Plan.
iii. In the event any of the individuals described in subsection (i) above do not
comply with the provisions of the Plan Documents relating to use and
disclosure of PHI, the Plan Administrator shall impose reasonable sanctions
as necessary, in its discretion, to ensure that no further non - compliance
occurs. Such sanctions shall be imposed progressively (for example, an oral
warning, a written warning, time off without pay and termination), if
appropriate, and shall be imposed so that they are commensurate with the
severity of the violation.
"Plan Administration" activities are limited to activities that would meet the
definition of payment or health care operations, but do not include functions
to modify, amend or terminate the Plan or solicit bids from prospective
issuers. 'Plan Administration" functions include quality assurance, claims
processing, auditing, monitoring and management of carve -out plans, such as
vision and dental. It does not include any employment - related functions or
functions in connection with any other benefit or benefit plans.
Rev. 6.15.04 -7-
The Plan shall disclose PHI to the Employer only upon receipt of a certification by the
Employer that (a) the Plan Documents have been amended to incorporate the above provisions and
(b) the Employer agrees to comply with such provisions.
3. Disclosure of Certain Enrollment Information to the Employer
Pursuant to Section 164.504(f)(1)(iii) of the Privacy Standards (45 CFR 164.504(f)(1)(iii)), the
Plan may disclose to the Employer information on whether an individual is participating in the Plan
or is enrolled in or has disenrolled from a health insurance issuer or health maintenance organization
offered by the Plan to the Employer.
4. Disclosure of PHI to Obtain Stop -loss or Excess Loss Coverage
The Employer hereby authorizes and directs the Plan, through the Plan Administrator or its
third party administrator, to disclose PHI to stop -loss carriers, excess loss carriers or managing
general underwriters (MGUs) for underwriting and other purposes in order to obtain and maintain
stop -loss or excess loss coverage related to benefit claims under the Plan. Such disclosures shall be
made in accordance with the Privacy Standards.
5. Other Disclosures and Uses of PHI
With respect to all other uses and disclosures of PHI, the Plan shall comply with the Privacy
Standards.
Name of Employer: City ofMMIewood
Authorized Signature:
Printed Name:
Date:
Rev. 6.15.04 - 8 -
Agenda Item H.1
REPORT SUMMARY
Applicant: Alan Menning, Manager of Edgerton Manor
Site Address: 2021 Edgerton Street
Zoning: Multiple Dwelling Residential (R -3)
Land Use: High Multiple Dwelling Residential (R -3H)
City Council Hearing Date: November 14, 2005
Project Description: The management for Edgerton Manor (2021 Edgerton
Street) proposes to redesign the existing entryway on Edgerton Street in order to
allow entry at grade level and provide a covered building entrance. City code
requires a multi- tenant building to maintain a 30 -foot setback to the right -of -way.
The existing building maintains a 37 -foot, 8 inch setback to the Edgerton Street
right -of -way. The proposed covered building entrance will come within 9 feet, 8
inches of the right -of -way.
Requests: The applicant is requesting a 20 -foot, 4 -inch front yard setback
variance and design review approval for the covered entryway.
Recommendations: The Community Design Review Board and staff
recommend approval of the variance and design review for the covered
entryway.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM:
Shann Finwall, AICP, Planner
SUBJECT:
Edgerton Manor
LOCATION:
2021 Edgerton Street
DATE:
November 7, 2005
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Alan Menning, manager of the Edgerton Manor at 2021 Edgerton Street, is proposing to
redesign the existing front door along Edgerton Street in order to allow entry at grade
level and provide a covered building entrance.
Requests
To build the covered building entrance the applicant is requesting the following city
approvals:
A 20 -foot, 4 -inch front yard setback variance. City code requires a multi- tenant
building to maintain a 30 -foot setback to the right -of -way. The existing building
maintains a 37 -foot, 8 -inch setback to the Edgerton Street right -of -way. The
proposed covered building entrance will come within 9 feet, 8 inches of the right -
of -way requiring a 20 -foot, 4 -inch front yard setback variance.
2. Design Review
DISCUSSION
The building was constructed in 1971, prior to state handicap accessibility requirements.
The front entry along Edgerton Street currently consists of a looped driveway with a
double stairwell leading up one flight of stairs to the uncovered front door. The existing
stairway is in need of repair or replacement.
The applicant proposes to remove the exterior stairway and front door and replace it with
a small vestibule located on the ground level as well as a covered building entrance.
Only the covered entrance will extend into the required 30 -foot front yard setback by 20
feet, 4 inches. The covered entryway will come within 9 feet, 8 inches of the right -of-
way, which will be consistent with Edgerton School's setback to the right -of -way which is
located to the south of this property.
The exterior of the vestibule will be constructed of white - colored stucco with a hunter
green trimmed entry door. The covered entryway will have white columns with a brick
base to match the building.
In addition to the entryway, the applicant proposes landscaping improvements to include
two small retaining walls constructed of brick to match the building. Within the retaining
walls, the applicant proposes new plantings to include three ornamental trees, 12
evergreen bushes, 28 deciduous bushes, and 38 perennials.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS
The neighbors were supportive of the front entryway remodeling. However, two
neighbors expressed concern over on- street parking from tenants and guests at
Edgerton Manor. Mr. Menning states that Edgerton Manor has 63 units with 94
underground parking spaces and 20 surface parking spaces. He thinks the problem
might be that some of the tenants do not purchase an underground parking space for
their vehicle and then utilize one or more of the guest parking spaces permanently,
forcing guests to park on the street. Currently there are 16 underground parking spaces
which are not rented or used for guest parking. He would be receptive to posting no-
parking signs in front of Edgerton Manor.
Dan Soler, traffic engineer with Ramsey County, states that the county could post no-
parking signs in front of Edgerton Manor on Edgerton Street if directed by the city
council. However, he felt that Edgerton Street is wide enough to accommodate on- street
parking without causing a traffic or safety problem. Staff also feels that posting no-
parking signs in front of the building would cause additional parking problems to
properties located to the north or south of Edgerton Manor due to the fact that the guests
would be forced to park further away from the property.
Mr. Menning states that there is little room for additional surface parking on the site.
Therefore, staff feels the solution lies in the management requiring tenants to lease
underground parking spaces for each vehicle they own. Mr. Menning states he will look
into this possibility. In addition, staff recommends that the city monitor the on- street
parking situation to determine the need for no- parking signs along Edgerton Street.
OTHER COMMENTS
Chuck Vermeersch, City Engineering Department: The setback variance for Edgerton
Manor appears to be a reasonable request. It would improve access to the building for
the residents and make it easier to maintain safe pedestrian access in the winter. For
these reasons, the engineering department is not opposed to granting the variance.
However, Edgerton Street is under county jurisdiction and this proposal should be
reviewed by the county as well.
Dan Soler, County Engineering Department: The changes to the front entryway of the
building do not change any existing access drives from Edgerton Street. The
modification will not have any adverse effect on traffic operations along Edgerton Street.
The existing right -of -way in front of 2021 Edgerton Street has already been increased to
49.5 feet on the west side of the section line. This should be more than adequate right -
of -way for any future work on Edgerton Street. The county does not object to the
setback variance request.
Butch Gervais, Fire Marshal: 1) Need 20 -foot emergency access road; 2) fire protection
system per codes and monitored; 3) proper marking of door where fire protection system
is located; 4) fire department lock box installed.
2
David Fisher, Building Official: 1) Provide complete building code analysis when the
contractor applies for the building permit; 2) Per the file, the Edgerton Manor Apartment
was built in 1971. This is before the State Building Code was adopted. The 2000
International Building Code would require all openings within 5 to 30 feet to be protected
with one -hour construction; 3) A Type II -A construction with a 9 -foot, 8 -inch setback
would require one hour construction and the building to be 100% fire sprinklered using
the 2000 IBC; 4) The project is required to have an accessible route to meet Minnesota
State Building Code Chapter 1341 Accessibility.
COMMITTEE ACTION
The Community Design Review Board recommended approval of the front yard setback
variance and design review at their October 25, 2005, meeting (Attachment 7).
SUMMARY
The proposed covered entryway will better serve the tenants and meet the Minnesota
handicap accessibility requirements. The improvements are attractive and will match the
existing building materials. Staff recommends these improvements on the condition that
the management review their parking policy to determine if requiring tenants to lease or
use underground parking for all of their vehicles is feasible and that the city monitor the
on- street parking along Edgerton Street to determine the need for no- parking signs. City
staff will bring the results of the study back to the city council for review within two
months of the variance approval.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Adopt the front yard setback variance resolution attached. This resolution
approves a 20 -foot, 4 -inch front yard setback variance for the construction of a
covered entryway for Edgerton Manor located at 2021 Edgerton Street. Approval
is based on the following findings:
a. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the property and not created by the current
property owner. The building was constructed in 1971, prior to any
handicap accessibility requirements. At that time the building was
constructed 37 feet, 8 inches to the Edgerton Street right -of -way, limiting
the buildable area for a handicap accessible entryway.
b. Construction of the proposed handicap accessible entryway will better
serve the tenants and meet the Minnesota Handicap Accessibility
requirements.
C. The right -of -way along Edgerton Street in this area is inconsistent and
there is existing development on the west side of the street which is
closer than that being requested for the handicap accessible entryway.
The variance is approved with the following conditions:
3
a. Edgerton Manor management shall review their parking policy to
determine if requiring tenants to lease or use underground parking for all
of their vehicles is feasible.
b. The City of Maplewood will monitor on- street parking along Edgerton
Street to study the need for no- parking signs. City staff will bring the
results of the study back to the city council within two months of the date
of the variance approval for review.
2. Approve the plans date - stamped September 20, 2005, for the proposed covered
entryway at Edgerton Manor located at 2021 Edgerton Street. Approval is
subject to the following conditions:
a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building
permit for this project.
b. Before getting a building permit, the applicant must submit to staff for
approval the following:
1) A revised landscape plan showing all sizes of the proposed plant
species.
2) Sample building materials to be approved by staff.
3) New entry door frames to be hunter green to match existing
shutters. All other materials to match existing building materials.
C. The applicant shall complete the following before final inspection of the
covered entryway:
1) Install all required landscaping.
2) Make all necessary repairs to the existing driveway due to
damage by construction.
d. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
13
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed the 58 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of this site for their
comments. Seven comments were received as follows:
John Ahem, Edgerton School Principal: The proposal makes sense.
2. Denise Wold, 2010 Edgerton Street North: The plans look nice and would add a
much needed new look! I would also like to see the elimination of on- street
parking specific to the apartments. I believe it should be a requirement for all
tenants and visitors to use designated parking in the parking areas. I am tired of
the tenants and their visitors using part of my front yard (grass) to park.
Edgerton has become busier over the past few years. When people use the
street as parking it not only contributes to the congestion but also makes it
extremely difficult to access my driveway or enter Edgerton from my driveway
(very difficult to see). It also, without sidewalks, makes it difficult for everyone
trying to walk including myself. I would like to see these issues addressed when
the improvements to the building are made.
3. Debra Newman, 2050 Bradley Street North: It's fine with me.
4. Barbara Blakley, 573 Skillman Avenue: If this is better for the tenants and the
handicap, then they should move forward. The design looks good.
5. Michelle Brechon, 563 Skillman Avenue: I feel that this plan is very good and I
am not bothered at all by the remodeling. I think there are several older people
living there and I think it would be much safer for the tenants than the current
(steps) status, especially in the wintertime. I also think the plans look very nice
and would enhance the neighborhood's look. Therefore, I believe that you
should allow this remodeling.
6. Janice McGuire, 2080 Bradley Street: Keep city code as is. Do not alter code for
Edgerton Manor. Worry about the terrible streets, etc. Maplewood is getting
more run -down and undesirable to live in every year.
7. Laura Powers, 557 Skillman Avenue: I would be okay with it, as long as there is
absolutely no parking allowed at any time in any of the driveway or at the street.
It is dangerous when going east on Skillman and when waiting to turn left (or
north) onto Edgerton and in looking for traffic coming from the right (in front of
Edgerton Manor) and it can't be seen when cars are parked in front.
5
REFERENCE
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 1.93 Acres
Existing Use: Rental Apartments
6il1 N:A111.I Q I.I;HAe1.111119 *1
North: One Single Family House and Townhouses
South: Edgerton Park
East: Single Family Houses
West: Apartments
PLANNING
Land Use Plan Designation: High Multiple Dwelling Residential (R -3H)
Zoning: Multiple Dwelling Residential (R -3)
Findings for Variance Approval
State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance:
Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the property under consideration.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
Undue hardship, as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means the
property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions
allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances
unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and a variance if granted, will not
alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not
constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of
the ordinance.
Design Review
Section 2 -290 of the city code requires that the community design review board make
the following findings to approve plans:
That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to
neighboring, existing or proposed developments, and traffic is such that it will not
impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will
not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or
proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the
character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the
0
harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and
the city's comprehensive municipal plan.
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a
desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is
aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors.
Application Date
We received the complete application and plans for this proposal on September 20,
2005. State law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete
applications for a proposal. City council action is required on this proposal by
November 19, 2005, unless the applicant agrees to a time extension.
P: Sec 17 \Edgerton Manor \10 -25 -05 CDRB Memo
Attachments:
1.
Variance Statement
2.
Location Map
3.
Survey
4.
Landscape Plan
5.
Elevations
6.
Variance Resolution
7.
October 25, 2005, CDRB Minutes
7
Attachment 1
David L. Farris
x Architect
17675 HOGAN AVE. I1ASTINGS, MN. 55033 / 651480 -2087 / DL11987 @AOL.COM
20 SEPT. 2005
VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR:
EDGERTON MANOR
2021 EDGERTON STREET
MAPLEWOOD, MN.
PROPOSAL
TO ALLOW A PROPERTY LINE SETBACK @ EDGERTON OF APPROXIMATELY
9' WHERE 30' IS REQUIRED.
JUSTIFICATION
• THE EXISTING ENTRY IS IN NEED OF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT. IT IS
INCONVENIENT TO THE TENANTS AND UNSUITABLE TO MINNESOTA
CLIMATE. THIS PROPOSAL WILL REDESIGN THE ENTRY TO ENTER AT
GRADE AND PROVIDE A COVERED HANDI -CAP BUILDING ENTRANCE
TO BETTER SERVE THE TENANTS & MEET THE MINNESOTA H.C.
ACCESSIBLE REQUIREMENTS.
• ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY THE DEVELOPED PAVEMENT FOR THIS
PARCEL @ EDGERTON IS APPROXIMATELY 33' EAST OF THE
PROPERTY LINE.
• THE RIGHT OF WAY ALONG EDGERTON IN THIS AREA IS
INCONSISTENT AND THERE IS EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ON THE
WEST SIDE OF THE STREET WHICH IS CLOSER. THAN THIS REQUEST.
DAVID L. HARRIS, ARCHITECT
Attachment 2
iL o
q Q boo
N�m OEM
0 MEN
0 MEN
' 0 1 NEW ■ ®■
u L : ■ ■ ■
I
ELI
C7
o
a
2021 Edgerton Street
Edgerton Manor
El
El
El
° e
Q
°Q E01°
0 Edgerton School-
Edgerton St. setback is
o consistent with proposed
Edgerton Manor setback
❑C
Q a �a "IolGpd = 0
El
0
Q
B
o
a 0 �
0
Location Map
M
r y It l 1 '+ri Iv� 1rP rIIN�rI �i� k�l�, �� I� a tl 1
/3S da�i n r tt
tx k6x d 1 5 1 1 ✓� v ^ mr ;a � �t 1�1 3 f r
:
A
i }
cb r
LLL���rrrll { �
d� su' r !.
l rw svmhrat s
EXISTING 3 —SWp' ROItDING 11
a
i
_ --
>.arn w6�mrl�rv+^.xrwva 260.17 ��� dl 1 �1
i�
C
N
E
L
v
ro
-F�
Q
ALTA/ACSM Survey /ar.
mOERTON PROPERT @8 L9ATM PARTNMISHP
o/ Etlgerlon Monor
NOBS
f r r 1
f I.
N
r V,6nity Map =_
Prmmnr mcn nw As L9Nrroxm w srRLiur c
yr vimssu rmc 6vuunumr nit xo ns yw
cEnrmtiwrmx )
Rehder and Q71n
nE V•
V 1/.
O
Z z
Z
z '-
w
�w
0
�w
Z N
Q O
J N
Q
OFWAY LINE
n
o l
Y /
o N
� O
.._
N
N
Dm
O
7 F
Q
\
W
\
Z W
j 2 h
m > 7
o m
(3)
SPRING SHOW CRABAPPLE
�
(10)
GOLDFLAME SPIREA
,y)
- cam
(12)
TAUNTON SPREADING YEW
(9)
RUMBA, WEIGELA
z
*
(12)
AUTUMN JOY OR NEON SEDUM
�¢n
(6)
IVORY HALO DOGWOOD
NSF
(12)
PURPLE CONE FLOWER
X11
(12)
ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA
(6)
BLACK —EYED SUSAN
(S)
PLUM PUDDING CORAL BELL
T
-N
C
F
6
L
U
ro
-V
Q
ll-
8
` � a
_ i Y
Siva v
Y
®
9 U
RM
111" A
m v
g d.�X
� 5e
6�d1 z
Z
r
N
Z
O
, Fr —
W
U`
N
O
N
— L'GS
o
— _— ___— _— _C.¢ -s
6
u
pp
R -aS977
loft
roll "M
ii ii ■��/ ;ii iii .
s�cnvmm�m.rca
mo
Attachment 6
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Alan Menning, manager of the Edgerton Manor, has applied for a
variance from the city's zoning code.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to 2021 Edgerton Street. The legal description is:
Edgerton Highlands: E 288.17 FT OF LOT 2 & ALL OF LOT 1 BLK 4
WHEREAS, Section 44- 20(c)(6) of the city's sign ordinance requires a 30 -foot front
yard setback from a right -of -way for all multi - family buildings.
WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to construct a front covered entryway which will
be set back 9 feet, 8 inches from the Edgerton Street right -of -way.
WHEREAS, the city council approved a 20 -foot, 4 -inch setback variance in order to
allow the applicant to construct the front entryway within 9 feet, 8 inches from the
Edgerton Street right -of -way.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
On October 11, 2005, the community design review board recommended that the
city council approve this variance.
The city council held a public hearing on November 14, 2005. City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing
an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above -
described variance for the following reasons:
Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the property and not created by the current property
owner. The building was constructed in 1971, prior to any handicap accessibility
requirements. At that time the building was constructed 37 feet, 8 inches to the
Edgerton Street right -of -way, limiting the buildable area for a handicap accessible
entryway.
Construction of the proposed handicap accessible entryway will better serve the
tenants and meet the Minnesota Handicap Accessibility requirements.
The right -of -way along Edgerton Street in this area is inconsistent and there is
existing development on the west side of the street which is closer than that
being requested for the handicap accessible entryway.
The variance is approved with the following conditions:
Edgerton Manor management shall review their parking policy to determine if
requiring tenants to lease or use underground parking for all of their vehicles is
feasible.
The City of Maplewood will monitor on- street parking along Edgerton Street to
determine the need for no- parking signs.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on
2
MIZE-MIMM
FALMOM
i 09
for phase one construction of Applewood Park. The park construction has gone extremely well with
the exception of some severe rain delays and related drainage/erosion issues.
The original budget for Applewood Park was $300,000. The monies are allocated from the park
development fund
I III RON 110111IM16 III M
the budget.
kph\cnange orders.applewood.parks-o.s.mern
Enclosures
(The contractor shall make the following changes to the contract)
Distribution To:
LJ Owner 0 Field
D Consultant 0 Other
-3 Contractor
Initiation Date: 13-Sep-05
Consultants Proiect: #05-13
City Pro act. #063-3
Contract Summary to Date
Original Contract Sum:
! f �
9 r-I I LIM WJ i I* �*i mli6myj or i a illj=
Consultant:
Brauer & Associates, Ltd.
10417 Excelsior Blvd., Suite #1
1;rpk;ns, MNIN 55343
jam/ ignfium
Date
Contractor:
Ebert Construction
23350 Co. Road 10
Corcoran, MN 55357
mmv"M�f
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Signature
16 /1 Y/V
Date
Date
Brauer Associates, Ltd. HADOM2005,Jason - 2005105-13 APPI EWOOD\site otrservafion%change order 1,xIs Page I of 1
• Kel ii�'. - #M
Distribution To:
❑ Owner ❑ Field
• Consultant J Other
• Contractor
Rvmf�mgm
Contract Summary to Date
Consultant:
Brauer Associates, Ltd.
10.1 llg"Zin lig We N; A
Data
Data
RM
Brauer Assodates, Ltd, HMOM2005\ ason - 2005\05-13 APPLEWOOMMe obseNation\change order 2.xis Page 1 of I
Consultant:
Brauer Associates, Ltd.
10.1 llg"Zin lig We N; A
Data
Data
RM
Brauer Assodates, Ltd, HMOM2005\ ason - 2005\05-13 APPLEWOOMMe obseNation\change order 2.xis Page 1 of I
Agenda Item Kl
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cleric
DATE: November 5, 2005
RE: Canvass of General Election Results
It is recommended that Council approve the following resolution canvassing the results of
the General Election held on November 8, 2005:
CANVASS OF ELECTION
RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, acting
as a canvassing board on November 14, 2005, hereby declares the following results in the
November 8, 2005, City General Election:
MAYOR:
Diana Longrie 2,861
Will Rossbach 2,531
Diana Longrie, receiving the highest number of votes for the General Election will be
sworn in as Mayor at the January 9, 2006 council meeting.
COUNCIL MEMBER:
Rebecca Cave (Cunnien) 2,474
Erik Hjelle 2,772
Kathleen A. "Kathy" Juenemann 2,523
Marvin C. Koppen 2,229
Erik Hjelle and Kathleen Juenemann, receiving the top two highest number of votes for
the General Election will be sworn in as Councilmembers at the January 9, 2006 council
meeting.
Agenda Item K2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cleric
RE: Calling for a Special Election
DATE: November 5, 2005
Introduction
The city council recently approved an ordinance specifying that a special election be held in the event of a
council vacancy when more than six months is left in the term. With the September 2005 resignation of
Jackie Monahan -Junek there is a vacancy on the council. Monahan- Junek's seat is scheduled to be filled by
the temporary appointment of David Bartol.
Background
It takes approximately three months after a special election is called to meet all statutory requirements
required to conduct an election. Attached is the proposed schedule if council would call a special election at
the November 14, 2005 council meeting. Staff is proposing that the election be held on Tuesday, February
28, 2006 with the swearing -in of the newly elected council member taking place on March 13, 2006.
With this date the filing period will be published on Wednesday, November 23, 2005 for a required two
week period and the filing period will be open from December 7th through the 21 st.
Recommendation
Call for a Special Election to fill the vacancy on the city council to be held on February 28, 2006.
November
2005
1
2
3
4
6
7
8 tlunu:ipal
9
10
11
12
E(cction
13
14 Council
15 Lass day for
16
17
18 And W u, of
'„ 19
Meeting -
candidates to file
filing perio<i to
Cana ass General
certificates of
Lithe News
Election Results
filing - 7 days
and call Cor a
after Cky"on
Special Election
20
21
22
23 Filing period
24
25
26
pulAshed 2
weeks before
filing period
be gins
27
28 Council
29
30
Meeting IsAter
to polling sites
notification of
special Clectlon
December
2005
2
3
4
5
6
7 Filing period
8 Campaign
9
10
opens for 2
Finance reports
weeks
clue 30 days after
November 811,
11
12
13
14
IS)
16
17
is
19
20
21 Filing period
22 Prepare draft
23 Ballots to
24
closes
ballot", Ralusc
printer
county will
56-70 days to
choose rotation
ion
hold election
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
January
2006
3
4
15
6
7
of6c< ^s closed
8
9
10
11
12
13 Last day lo
14
rnAl absentee
ballot
applications to
voters on
permanent Hot
is
16 Holiday - MY
17
is
19
20
X21
offices OMNI
22
23 Council
24
25 Mast HRI
26 Send vice or
27 .Absentee
213
IACXlhlg -
avAlolAc for
Milton to LHA!
Balloting begins
Resolution
absentee voting
-
News
- 30 days before
appointing
32 (lays before
election
cWthm judges
election
29
30
31 AnIHIHI
campaign
finance reports
clue January 31
of each year
I . Nolwe of 2 3 Last clay to
EI , iiorl in Little appoint election
- yet ; -s judges __ 25 days
before election
6 First day to
conduct helalih
care absentee
voting - 20 days
before election
13
0 Honda — City
offiees elosed
7 Voter pre -
regist natiou .
eloses at 5:00
gyn. 21 days
before election
14
21 Final voter
registration. list
Mad FIVvion
Equymmnt
diagnoslics
S Mum of
Eleehon in Little
News — 2a:' week
requirement
15 Public
Accuracy 3 ast
and sample
ballot Fublished
i
16 Lsstday to
Foss Notice of
Election — 10
drays before
eleehori
10 Send nonce to
Litho News of
Publie Accuracy
Test (PAT) and
samhk ballot
17 Absaeutee
voting at
Maplewood
Manor and
Maplewood Care::
Center
27 City had open
until 5:00 for
absentee voting.
Staff delivers to
pnvur c:ts and
judges
28 Special
General
Election
22 Prepare
equipimmt for
election made —
PAT test I TO in
Maplewood Room
23 Atmentm
voting at Walker
at Hareiridge &
Ramsey County
Horne
24 Mrsi day for
Ageut Delivery to
Nealth Care
Faerlities.
k,z c r.t x Rallot
Bourd _ ITC Y)
M arch
2006
2 Lasi day to
3
4
rc:�iurn rosf:c:�ra
and voter
registrafion cards
to Ramsev
Counts
5
6 Special Council
7 State
precinct
8
9
10 mast day for
'.11
meeting to
caucus
candiddies I
canvass results
request recount
of special
in writing t ;ithin
cqcction and.
5 d<ays of
''.
declare results
canvass
12
13 WWI
14
15
16
17
18
:4Scct:ing Swear
in Council
member(s) within
7 days or (mnvass
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 Campaign
31
finance reports
due frorri Special
Election
1 28i :h
Agenda Item K3
Memorandum
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cleric
DATE: November 8, 2005
RE: Consideration of Ballot Question
Introduction
Minnesota State Statute 340A.413 places restrictions on the number of intoxicating liquor
licenses that may be issued to cities. The City may not have more than 18 licenses,
unless a referendum is placed on the ballot by the governing body and passed by the
electorate. The first referendum that was held was in 1983, increasing the number of
allowable liquor licenses to 25.
On November 2, 1999 a referendum was held increasing the availability of liquor licenses
from 25 to 32.
There are currently 28 license holders and two applicants pending. After approval of
these two licenses, the City will have two remaining licenses available.
Background
Considering current and proposed development in Legacy Village, Gladstone, Hillcrest,
the Best Buy area and the empty Bennigan's, staff is requesting council consideration of
a ballot referendum for an additional five (5) licenses. It is noteworthy that 19 out of the
current 28 licenses issued are for restaurants or recreation uses.
If council approves the referendum ballot question for the Special Election, the governing
body must direct the following question be placed on the ballot:
Shall the City council be allowed to issue five `on -sale' licenses
for the sale of intoxicating liquor in excess of the number
now permitted by law?
Yes.......
No........
Recommendation
Approve the referendum for the Special Election and the above wording to be placed on
the Special Election ballot.
Agenda Item K4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cleric
DATE: November 5, 2005
RE: Intoxicating Liquor License
Introduction
Gjon Prendi has submitted a request for an intoxicating liquor license for The Olive
Garden Italian Restaurant located at 1740 Beam Avenue.
Background
Mr. Prendi is originally from New York and came to Minnesota in 1985 to attend
Southwest State University in Marshall, Minnesota.
He has been residing in Burnsville for over five years and has been employed by Olive
Garden since 1990. He has worked at the Burnsville, Minneapolis, and Eden Prairie
stores prior to coming to Maplewood.
One of Mr. Prendi's references was complimentary of him. In fact he stated, "Gjon is
one of the nicest individuals that he has ever met." Another stated, that he has known
Gjon for eleven years and "He is a great business man and family man."
Chief Thomalla has personally met with Mr. Prendi to discuss measures to eliminate the
sale of alcohol to underage persons, general security and retail crime issues, and the
Maplewood Liquor Ordinances.
In the course of this investigation, state criminal history files were checked along with
contacts and warrants in the Cities of St. Paul, Eden Prairie, Burnsville, and Ramsey, and
Hennepin Counties.
Recommendation
Nothing was identified in the background check that would prohibit Mr. Prendi from
holding a liquor license.
Agenda Item K5
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cleric
DATE: November 5, 2005
RE: Intoxicating Liquor License
Introduction
Matthew Hinrichs has submitted a request for an intoxicating liquor license for Noodles
& Company located at 2865 White Bear Avenue.
Background
Mr. Hinrichs is from Guttenberg, Iowa and is currently residing in Coon Rapids,
Minnesota. He spent three years active duty in the Army and was honorably discharged
in August 2005. Mr. Hinrichs' references were all favorable.
Chief Thomalla has personally met with Mr. Hinrichs to discuss measures to eliminate
the sale of alcohol to underage persons, general security and retail crime issues, and the
Maplewood Liquor Ordinances.
In the course of this investigation, state criminal history files were checked along with
contacts and warrants in the Cities of Coon Roads, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Guttenberg,
Iowa and Anoka, Ramsey, and Hennepin Counties.
Recommendation
Nothing was identified in the background check that would prohibit Mr. Hinrichs from
holding a liquor license.
Agenda Item K6
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cleric
DATE: November 5, 2005
RE: Intoxicating Liquor License
Introduction
Guneet Ameja has submitted a request for an intoxicating liquor license for A -1 Liquor
located at 19 Century Avenue.
Background
Mr. Ameja immigrated to the United States from India. He has been residing at his
current Inver Grove Heights address for the past three and one -half years and lived in
Minneapolis prior to that. Mr. Ameja is currently employed as an internal consultant for
the United Health Group and his references were favorable.
Chief Thomalla has personally met with Mr. Ameja to discuss measures to eliminate the
sale of alcohol to underage persons, general security and retail crime issues, and the
Maplewood Liquor Ordinances.
In the course of this investigation, state criminal history files were checked along with
contacts and warrants in the Cities of Maplewood, Inver Grove Heights, St. Paul,
Minneapolis and Ramsey, and Hennepin Counties. In addition, the Immigration
Naturalization Service confirmed that Mr. Ameja entered the country legally on June 5,
1996.
Recommendation
Nothing was identified in the background check that would prohibit Mr. Ameja from
holding a liquor license.
Agenda Item K7
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer
Erin Laberee, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Dahl Avenue Improvements - City Project 05 -10 — Resolution Considering
Dismissal of Assessment Objection Related to Property Ownership
DATE: November 3, 2005
INTRODUCTION
On October 24, 2005, the City Council conducted an Assessment Hearing for the Dahl Avenue
Improvements, City Project 05 -10. One objection was filed at the hearing from William Kayser on behalf of
Evelyn Wallace claiming that Evelyn Wallace was the rightful owner of the property. Based on advice from
the City Attorney, this objection should be denied.
Background
Dahl Avenue is a new public street constructed for the Woodhill Development. The proposed assessments
for the Dahl Avenue Street and Utility Improvements are for costs relating to the street and utility
construction that benefit the adjacent properties. The assessment is to property, not individuals, and the
City is not a party nor was involved in the lawsuits over the Woodhill Development. The assessment
objection claim of Mr. Kayser and a further claim that staff (Chuck AN) lied to the Council at the October
24, 2005 meeting is not supported by the facts. Attached is a copy of Mr. Kayser's objection form. Mr.
Kayser also left a voice mail and e-mail claiming staff provided the Council incorrect information.
Attached is the explanation of the lawsuits filed by Mr. Kayser on behalf of Evelyn Wallace. The City
Attorney summarizes the results of these lawsuits as follows:
It is our position that this suit, like its predecessors, is without merit. We believe the numerous court
rulings on the matter confirm this. It is our opinion that the property that the City now wishes to
assess was owned by the estate of James Kayser and properly conveyed to Benchmark
Companies and Nedegaard Custom Homes, Inc. We do not believe that Evelyn Wallace, William
Kayser or Nancy Lazaryan hold any interest in the property.
Property Ownership Issue
Mr. Kayser claims that Ramsey County records still show Evelyn C Wallace as the property owner. Mr.
Kayser must be referring to a query search of GIS property records. City staff checked with Ramsey
County Office of Registrar officials and determined that they are currently up to June 26 for records in the
Abstract Office and June 7` for records in the Torrens Office, as of November 3 Many of the property
orders identified in the City Attorney memo occurred in September 2005 and will not be identified in the
Ramsey County website data for another 3 -4 months. Mr. Kayser's claim is not valid, as the website data
is not legal information. Denial of his claim is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached Resolution Denying the Objection of William
Kayser for the Dahl Avenue, Street and Utility Improvements for Woodhill Development, City Project 05 -10
Attachments:
1. Resolution: Denial of Assessment Objection
2. Property Query Selection / Woodhill Sale Document
3. Location Map
4. City Attorney Memo
5. Kayser E -mail
Agenda Item K7
RESOLUTION
DENYING ASSESSMENT OBJECTION
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on October 24` 2005, calling for a Public
Hearing, the assessment roll for the Dahl Avenue, Street and Utility Improvements for Woodhill Development, City
Project 05 -10, was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, one property owner, Mr. William Kayser on behalf of Evelyn C. Wallace, filed an objection to
their assessments according to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows:
Mr. Kayser claims that Evelyn Wallace is the legal property owner of this parcel.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. That the objection of William Kayser is not based upon fact as noted by the City Attorney and records
provided by the current property owner and said objection is hereby denied.
2. The assessment roll for the Dahl Avenue Street and Utility Improvements for Woodhill Development remains
as proposed and approved on October 24, 2005, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Said assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
3. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2006 and shall bear interest at the rate of
6.1 percent per annum for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall
be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each
subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county
auditor, but no later than November 23` 2005, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with
interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the city clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time after
November 23` 2005, pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made
before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year.
5. The city engineer and city clerk shall transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to
be extended on the property tax lists of the county no later than November 24` 2005. Such assessments shall
be collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the council on this 14` day of November 2005.
Query /Selection Results Page 1 of I
Ramsey County Property (RRINFO) Se_arc- h_b_y_Parcel ID
Search
Parcel ID 132822120010
Street Number 2516'
Unit
Street LINWOOD AVE -` E
City MAPLEWOOD -
.,�
2IP 55119 -5873 r "�
t� •r--
Owner Name 1 EVELYN C WALLACE _)
Owner Name 2 % WILLIAM KAYSER d)
Owner Street Address 6408 81ST AVE N
Owner City/State /Zip BROOLYN PARK MN 55445 -2510
Homesteader Name i
Homesteader Name 2
Homesteader Street Address
Homesteader City/State /Zip
Deeded Acres 11.88
Deeded Area (sq.ft.) 517492.8
Approximate Lot Frontage (ft) 100
Tax Description SECTION 13 TOWN 28 RANGE 22 W 1/4 OF NE 1 ON NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 & NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (SUB7 TO
RD) OF SEC 13 TN 28 RN 22
Plat Name SECTION 13 TOWN 28 RANGE 22
Date Plat Recorded
Abstract ID
Torrens ID
County Land Use Code (CAMA) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, PLATTED LOT
County Land Use Code (PR&R) RES 1 UNIT
Market Value Land 2006 1092700
Market Value Bldg 2006 148400 �.
Market Value Total 2006 1241100
Market Value Land 2005 1086900
Market Value Bldg 2005 10000 ��'
Market Value Total 2005 1096900
Total Tax Payable 2005 9012
Date of Last Sale
Sale Price 0
r'
Homestead Description Non - homestead
Number of Residential Units 1
Year Residence Built 1961
Total Residential Living Area 1828 - --
Residence Exterior STUCCO
Residence Style RAMBLER �
Residence Number of Stories 1
Residence Number of Rooms 7
Residence Number of Bedrooms 4
Commercial Structure Type
Commercial Year Built 0���
Topography Rolling
Utilities All Public
School District North St Paul - Maplewood - Oakdale
Watershed District Metro Ramsey Washington
http: / /maps. metro- inet. us/ RamseyCoGISIntemal /AttributeDisplaySingle.htm 11!3/2605
UN 29 2005 10 :30 RM FR HINSHAW&CULBERTSONLLP334888e TO 4715 #791110 #7637 P.01
X INSH,AW
A RNEY
rr s AT LAW
& CULBLST SON LLP
lime 29, 2005
T612-334-2516
F 612434 -8888
www.himehawlaw.com
rwordsn@hinshawiaw.com
TO:
Kim Pribyl
COMPANY:
Benchmark
FROM: Rolfe A. Worden
MATTER NAME:
FAX NO.:
763 - 757 -0649
O
Campbell Mithun Tower
2222 South Ninth Street
Suite 3100
Minneapolis, MN 65402
PHONE NO.:
763 -757 -2926
USER ID: 4715
MATTER NO.: 791110
NO. OF PAGES (including this Cover): 3 SENDING OPERATOR:
RETURN TO: (other than above) Rolfe
❑ Sent by Office Services: 612- 334 -2721 ® Sent by 612- 334 -2654
COMMENTS, IF ANY:
A copy of the Personal Representative's Deed to Woodhill LLC to the Maplewood
property is attached.
.Rolfe
❑ Will follow by mail ❑ Will follow by overnight mail ® Will not follow
If you do not receive the number of pages listed above, please call 612- 334.2546. The documents that accompany this facsimile contain
confidential and privileged information and mx intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this transmission is
directed. Any disclosure of the information herein is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this
facsimile, please respond by facsimile to the number above or call the sending operator at our expense immediately so that we may
arrange for the return of this document to us at no cost to you. Thank you.
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP is an Illinois registered limited liability partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform
partnership Act (1997).
////OGS 110 -M Personal Represcatative's Deed Mdler /Dev7s Co. m St. Paul, MN 651.842.198a
Individual Personal Ropresentative(s) to Corporation
or Partnership, or U C (Top 3 inches Reserved for Recording Data) Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (8(24195) i
DEED TAX DUE- _ _..._ .....
Date: A _ - -S —t, 2'5f ...._.
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION
as Personal Representativc(s) of the
Decedent, of
ICJ
Decedent, single I' ] married at the time of death (i£ "married" is checked, attach a Consent of Spouse
(Form No. 106 -M)), Grantor, conveys to W..codhj LLLC_,._________...._. -_
Grantee, a ___...,... L 7i d I ian Cnm pauy.,- under the laws of — Tylznnesoia,._. —_�
real property in _.. .. __._ — Ramsey___......__._ —__... County, Minnesota, described as follows:
The North One -half (N. 1/2) of the West One -half (W, 1/2) of the Northwest One - quarter (N. W. 1/4) of the Northeast
Ono- quarter (N.E. 1 /4) of Section Thirteen (13), Township Twenty -eight North (T. 28 N), Range Twenty -two West
(R. 22 W), according to the U.S. Government survey thereof; and
the North One -half (N. 1/2) of the West One -half (W, 1/2) of the West One -half (W, 1/2) of the East One -half (E.
1/2) of the Northwest One - quarter (N.W. 1/4) of the Northeast One - quarter (N.E. 1/4) of Section Thirteen (13),
Township Twenty -eight North (T. 28 N), Range Twenty -two West (R. 22 W), according to the U.S- Government
Survey thereof,
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances
belonging thereto.
I V] The Seller certifies that the seller does not know orany wells on lulls,
described property.
A w0 disclosure certificate accompanies this document. Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here
I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and 1
certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property
hnve not changed since the last previously tiled well disclosure certificate. PERS L REPRESENT T�)
STATE OF'MINNESOTA _
COUNTY OF Ronald J. Riach
__ � �
This instrument was acknowledged before moon
by Rauald.J,.,Riacll_.... _ - -. _ Datd)
.. —__
as Personal Repres of t Estate of _ Iame Ka yre, Decedent.
NorA
SANDRA �.iL{.t��..��ta.G_v.. '
�^ VRA R(ACH Stf NATtatEOFN➢TAAY peat.IC ➢R OTrir;A OFFICIAL
Notary Pubtie- Minnesota
TmS 1NSTAnMENr WAS DtinF1'to BY (NAM1; AN➢ MDriyeej,
Ronald J. Riach
Franke & Riach, P,A,
1000 County Road E West
Suite 200
Shoreview, MN 55126-
651- 636 -6400
91133
Check here if part or all of the land is Registered (Torrcns)
Ta S for the real Oropcny dec,ihd in Nix imPNInint should
be emi i (induce na,rv and We,., orC,..j o,
Woodhill LLC
JUN 29 2995 10:31 AM FR HINSHPW&CULBERTSONLLP3348888 TO 4715979111047637 P.03
MAP Form No. 106-M Personal Representative's Deed Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks ($124195) Milicr -Davis Co -, St. Paul, MN
CONSENT OF SPOUSE
Jesusa A. Kayser Spouse of Jam es H, Kays
_
Decedent, consents to this Deed,
_ o Ouse - —
STATE OF MIN
COUNTY OF _ RA MSEY
.1 r
This instrument was acknowledged before me on
Jesusa A. Kayser (Dacc)
spouse of Decedent. �yJ7
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) /
*2% SANDRA l
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICIAL
Notary Public- Minnesota
My Cammiesion uxpims Jan 31, 2010
This form cannot be recorded independently. It must be attached to Personal
Representative's Deed (Form No. 109-M through Form No. 114 -M).
** TOTAL PPGE.03 **
Chicago Title Insurance Company
OWNERS POLICY
SCHEDULE A - PROFORMA
OFFICE FILE NUMBER POLICY N,(,1MPF�2 DATE OF POLI AMOUNT OF INSURANCE
20428
PROFO
Date of Recording
S 1,150,000.00
at Time of Recordin g
V
1. Name of lnsured:
Woodhill LLC
2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is:
Fee Simple
3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in the insured.
4. The land herein described is encumbered by the following mortgage or trust deed, and assignments.
Mortgage dated , filed , as Document No. , executed by
Woodhill LLC, as mortgagor, to Lakeland Construction Finance, LLC its successors and assigns, as
mortgagee, in the original principal amount of $1,735,000.00.
and the mortgages or trust deeds, if any, shown in Schedule 6 hereof.
5. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows:
The North One -half (N. Y,) of the West One -half (W. %) of the Northwest One - quarter (N.W.
114) of the Northeast One - quarter (N.E. 114) of Section Thirteen (13), Township Twenty -eight
North (T. 28 N), Range Twenty -two West (R. 22 W), according to the U. S. Government
survey thereof; and
the North One -half (N. 1 /2) of the West One -half (W. 1 h) of the West One -half (W. 1 f) of the
East One -half (E. 1 h) of the Northwest One - quarter (N.W. 114) of the Northeast One - quarter
(N.E. 114) of Section Thirteen (13), Township Twenty -eight North (T. 28 N), Range
Twenty -two West (R. 22 W), according to the U. S. Government Survey thereof.
Ramsey County, Minnesota
Abstract Property
AU TA A Owner's
Schedule A (10117192) This Policy valid only if Sehedula 8 is attached. (20426,pfd.20426158)
Chicago Title Insurance Company
OWNERS POLICY
SCHEDULE B
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
Office File No. 20426
Policy Number: PROFORMA
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or
expenses) which arise by reason of:
A. Real estate taxes payable in the second half of 2005 and thereafter.
Property identification No. 13- 28 -22 -12 -0010
B. Levied assessments of record.
Project Principal Balance Due
1. Water Tower $2,103.59
2. Street/Utility $5,332.00
NOTE: There are no pending assessments of record.
E: ed Ass ment 5 elow. " tr
2 Rights or claims of tenants, as tenants only, in possession under unrecorded leases.
3. Easement for pipe line, in favor of Great Lakes Pipe Line Company, a Delaware corporation, as created
in document filed March 31, 1931, in Book 892 of Deeds, Page 352.
Conveyed to Williams Brothers Pipe Line Company, a Delaware corporation, in Special Warranty Deed
dated March 15, 1966, filed April 5, 1966, as Document No. 1672978 in Book 2018 RCR, Page 575,
4. Mortgage dated 6 � ;L - 0 J , filed_, as Document No. executed
by Woodhili LLC, as mortgagor, to Lakeland Construction Finance, LLC its successors and assigns, as
mortgagee, in the original principal amount of $50,000.00.
5. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by
an accurate survey and inspection of the premises.
6. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records.
This proforma policy reflects a status of record which is anticipated to exist at time of issuance and does
8_ot reflect the present record title.
4 % 6£ ,2 SCt71L t U
/Y�� 1'7`t�a°�iL. -� °c.C.. '6 c�ltif.%2^- -1 t -G'�� �i C•� �.J �� }'-�
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE, COMPANY
OWNERS POLICY
SCHEDULE B (continued)
Office File No. 20426
Policy Number: PROFORMA
Issuing Agent:
Commercial Partners Title, LLC
200 South 0th Street, Suite 13Y
Minneapolis, MN 55402 ;
(612)337 -2470
Countersigned
ALTA OWner'slLeesehold Owner's
Schedule 8 (16117192) (20426.pfd/20426158)
ENDORSEMENT 9
Attached to Policy No
PROFORMA
Issued by
Chicago Title Insurance Company
File Number.20426
The Company insures the insured against loss or damage sustained by reason of:
1. The existence, at Date of Policy, of any of the following unless expressly excepted in Schedule B:
( Present violations on the land of any enforceable covenants, conditions or restrictions, or or plat
building lines;
(b) Any instrument referred to in schedule B as specifically containing covenants, conditions or
restrictions on the land which, In addition, (i) establish an easement on the land; (it) provides for
either a lien for liquidated damages, a levy of private charge or assessment; (iii) an option to purchase
or prior approval of a future purchaser or occupant;
(c) Any encroachment of existing improvements located on the land onto adjoining land, or any
encroachment onto the land of existing improvements located on adjoining land.
(d) Any encroachment of existing improvements located on the land onto that portion of the land subject
to any easement excepted in Schedule B_
Z. The existence, at Date of Policy, of any covenants, conditions or restrictions under which the title insured
in Schedule A can be divested.
3. Any final court order or judgment denying the right to maintain any existing improvements on the land
because of any violation of covenants, conditions or restrictions or building setback lines shown on a plat
of subdivision recorded or filed in the public records, or because of any encroachment thereof onto
adjoining land.
Wherever in this endorsement the words "covenants, conditions or restrictions" appear, they shall not be
deemed to refer to or include the terms, covenants, conditions or !imitations contained in any lease, any
instrument creating an easement or any declaration of condominium, referred to in Schedule A.
This endorsement is made a part of the policy and is subject to all of the terms and provisions thereof and any
prior endorsements thereto. Except to the extent expressly stated, it neither modifies any of the terms and
provisions of the policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it extend the effective date of the policy and any
prior endorsements, nor does it increase the face amount thereof.
Issuing Agent:
Commercial Partners Title, LLC
200 South 6th Street, Suite 1300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612)337 -2470
Countersigned:
This endorsement shall not be valid or binding until
signed by an authorized signatory.
Owner's comprehensive Endorsement
(20426. prdl2042616 7 )
ENDORSEMENT No. 2
Attached to and forming a part of
Owner's Policy No. PROFORMA
Issued by
Chicago Title Insurance Company
File Number: 20426
TAX PARCEL ENDORSEMENT
The Company hereby insures the insured against loss or damage by reason of any inaccuracy in the following
assurance:
The land referred to on Schedule A herein is completely covered by tax identification number
13- 28 -22 -12 -0010. Said tax identification number does not include any other property.
This endorsement is made a part.of the commitment or policy. It is subject to all of the terms of the commitment
or policy and prior endorsements. Except as expressly stated on this endorsement, the terms, dates and
amounts of the commitment or policy and prior endorsements are not changed.
Issuing Agent:
Commercial Partners Title, LLC
200 South 6th Street, Suite 9300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612 )337 -2470
Countersigned:
Authorized Signatory
This endorsement shall not be valid or binding
until signed by an authorized sfgnartory. (20426.pfW20426/63)
..
�� KING ST, � �7 ODAQ BATTLE CREEK
MAI LAND ° GOLF
CIR. o COURSE
° ° c O
1. CRESTVIEW Q
° ° vista Hills Z
z MPark Park J FOREST
EAK- Q O Park Of DR.
O
NOOD � � 1 2 ' 2. DEER RIDGE
==3 O w TEAKWOOD DR. Cn LN.
CT. ° Q OAKRIDGE DR.
3: w Off.
HILL WOOD LL
z
cn Q
cn o > 2 ' DR. HILL 04k RIOGE
ly-
L�j v 1 CT
SPR/NCSIDE �r(T���` U
AE ° DR. Q� w AVE.
LINWOOD w
KP H L AVE. LINWOOD oP� PROMO o �
° y NTORy z U
Z r OJECT D z SPLEN
LOCATION
o Li TIMBER WHITE OAk sNOw
TIMBER TR. o LER DR. C�
8011M Le B� z SG�pL CIR.
5
PHYLIS CT,
< U ADR. � U w P\N
J z 2
VVIEWY �� VALLEY VIEW AVE. ReDP 3
3. /NE 1
AV. _ -- I-- -- OAR.
1. a 2. HIGHWOOD Cn Cn cn AVE. 1 7 1 7
� o w
L/q /E n o Q o z
= MAMIE AVE Q Q71 AVE. cn O W
O
Y ¢ MP�P. NEMITZ 4g4
o° AVE. < � NEMITZ ST.
ER
)RI
CIF
�LN
no scale
Dahl Avenue, Street and Utility Improvements
for Woodhill Development C.P. 05 -10
Location Map
Memorandum
To: Chuck Ahl
From: Dave Ramberg
Date: October 17, 2005
RE: Dahl Avenue, Street and Utility Improvements for
Woodhill Development, City Project 05 -10
On September 28, 2005, you requested our opinion on ownership issues affecting
certain property legally described as:
The West Quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
the Northeast Quarter and the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (subject to road) all in Section 13,
Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
Said property is to be assessed in conjunction with the above - referenced project.
This property has been the subject of multiple lawsuits initiated by, or on behalf of,
Evelyn Wallace and her two children William Kayser and Nancy Lazaryan.I It is
our opinion that the property is owned by Benchmark Companies and that the
progeny of lawsuits challenging its ownership is without merit.
BACKGROUND
On January 9, 2001, James H. Kayser executed his last will and testament. In his
will, James Kayser devised 60% of the residue of his estate to his spouse, Jesusa
Kayser, and 40% of the residue to his two minor children, Karen and Kenneth
Kayser. James Kayser "specifically disinherit[ed] all other parties not specifically
named" in his will. This group of disinherited parties included, among others,
Nancy Lazaryan and William Kayser.
James Kayser died on June 3, 2003. An application for informal probate of the will
1 Evelyn Wallace is a former spouse of James Kayser. William Kayser and Nancy Lazaryan are their children from
that marriage.
followed. Nancy Lazaryan and William Kayser objected, arguing that decedent
lacked testamentary capacity. Special administrator Ronald Riach moved for
summary judgment. In May 2004, the district court granted his motion on some of
the issues but denied his motion on the issue of testamentary capacity.
The three paragraphs describing what occurred are taken from the recent Appelate
Court decision of Estate of James K Kayser, Decedent, A04 -1910 (Minn. Ct.
App. June 28, 2005), review denied (Minn. Aug. 24, 2005).
Sometime before June 16, 2004, the locks on decedent's homestead
were changed and "no trespassing" signs were posted on decedent's
property. On June 17, 2004, Evelyn Wallace faxed Riach a letter
claiming that she had taken possession of decedent's homestead. The
next day, the district court granted Riach's request for a temporary
restraining order prohibiting Wallace and [Nancy Lazaryan and
William Kayser] from entering decedent's homestead. After a hearing,
the district court issued a temporary injunction prohibiting Wallace,
[Nancy Lazaryan and William Kayser], or their agents from entering
decedent's homestead. Within a day or two after the issuance of the
temporary injunction, [Nancy Lazaryan and William Kayser] or their
agents returned to decedent's property and again changed the locks.
On July 1, 2004, Wallace and [Nancy Lazaryan and William Kayser]
filed a lawsuit against the Ramsey County district court judge who
had presided over the probate proceedings; Riach; and several other
parties; alleging various violations of state law in connection with the
issuance of the temporary injunction against Wallace and [Nancy
Lazaryan and William Kayser That same day, [Nancy Lazaryan and
William Kayser] filed a request to remove the judge from the probate
proceedings. Their request ultimately was denied for failure to
affirmatively show prejudice.
At trial in August 2004, the district court heard testimony regarding
decedent's testamentary capacity from four witnesses. The district
court found that decedent had testamentary capacity when he executed
his will and dismissed appellants' remaining objections to the probate
2 That lawsuit was eventually dismissed by Judge Harry Crump. The dismissal was upheld by the Court of Appeals
in Lazaryan v. Judge Marrinan of the Ramsey County District Court in her Capacity Personally, A05 -28 (Minn. Ct.
App. Sept. 6, 2005).
2
of the will. The district court also determined that a permanent
injunction was necessary to protect decedent's homestead from
damage caused by Wallace and [Nancy Lazaryan and William
Kayser].
Id., at 1. Among other things, the district court found that James Kayser's
"homestead, located [at] 2516 Linwood Avenue East... was owned in fee simple
by the Decedent and is a probate asset, rightfully under the control of the Special
Administrator." (J. Marrinan's Order, Finding of Facts, ¶ 30.) The court also found
that "Evelyn Wallace, formerly Evelyn Kayser, and Robert L. Wallace, her
husband, executed a Quit Claim Deed to the homestead in favor of James H.
Kayser on October 5, 1978, which Deed was recorded... An Amended Judgment
and Decree dated October 6, 1978 was filed in the above described dissolution
action and recorded... award[ing] the homestead to the Decedent, James H.
Kayser... " (Id., ¶ 35.) The court found "The title insurance commitment issued by
Chicago Title Insurance Company with an effective date of May 9, 2004 correctly
identifies the Decedent as the owner of the real estate... " (Id., ¶ 39.)
In addition to these findings of fact, the district court made the following
conclusion of law. "Evelyn Wallace, William Kayser and Nancy Lazaryan have no
right, title, or interest in or to the property... which property is owned in fee by
James H. Kayser, deceased." (J. Marrinan's Order, Conclusions of Law, ¶ 3.) The
court granted the permanent injunction noted above, stating:
Evely Wallace, William Kayser, and Nancy Lazaryan, their agents, servants,
employees, attorneys, and those persons in active concert and participation
with them who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or
otherwise, are hereby prohibited and restrained from entering upon the
property located at 2516 Linwood Avenue East, Maplewood, Minnesota.
(J. Marrinan's Order at 8, ¶ 2(a).) It further ordered the return of all personal
property they removed from the property (Id., ¶ 2(b)) and discharged the Notice of
Lis Pendens filed June 15, 2004 (Id. at 9, ¶ 7).
Nancy Lazaryan and William Kayser then challenged on appeal the issuance of the
permanent injunction, the denial of their request for removal, and the dismissal of
their objections to the probate of decedent's will. In June of 2005, the Court of
3 A Notice of Lins Pendens serves to place a party on notice that the relevant property is the subject of litigation.
One acquiring an interest in the property during the pending action takes it subject to the outcome of the suit.
3
Appeals upheld the lower court's decisions. See, Estate of- ,Tames H. Kayser,
Decedent. The following month, the Minnesota Supreme Court declined to further
review the matter.
Immediately the Appellate Court's decision, Nancy Lazaryan filed a motion to
hold Mr. Riach in contempt of court. In response, the District Court issued an order
1) declining to entertain the motion, and 2) prohibiting Ms. Lazaryan and Mr.
Kayser from filing any further pleadings in the case.
In July of 2005, Evelyn Wallace then filed a Complaint for Quite Title of the
property. Ms. Wallace named Mr. Riach (as representative of the estate) and
Ramsey County District Court as defendants in the matter. Ms. Wallace further
sought a temporary injunction. By order dated July 15, 2005, District Court Judge
Robert Lynn denied Ms. Wallace's request for a temporary injunction noting:
The relief sought by Ms. Wallace has already been litigated and
decided adversely to her position in the underlying action. These
findings have been upheld recently... [by] the Court of Appeals...
There is no likelihood Plaintiff will succeed on the merits of her
underlying claims. Rather, she, with the support of certain family
members, seems to believe it proper to file new lawsuits. It is not.
Judge Lynn then set the matter on for a hearing, to consider the dismissal of the
lawsuit. The hearing took place on August 30, 2005. At the hearing, Assistant
Attorney General John Garry appeared on behalf of the defending court, attorney
Ronald Riach appeared on behalf of the defending estate, and attorney Patrick
Tierney appeared on behalf of plaintiff Wallace.
By Order of September 20, 2005, Judge Lynn granted Defendants' motion ofr
summary judgment and dismissed Plaintiff's quiet title action. The court found that
"Plaintiff [previously] had a full and fair opportunity to be heard on the ownership
issue or that those in privity with Plaintiff (i.e. Ms. Lazaryan and Mr. Kayser) had
a full and fair opportunity to be heard on the ownership issue." (J. Lynn Order at
11.) The court stated: "It is clear, from the above discussion on collateral estoppel,
that Plaintiff has no legal interest in the Property and, therefore, no legitimate basis
for a quiet title action." (Id. at 13.) The court concluded that, "Plaintiff is estopped
from claiming she has an interest in the Property and there is, therefore, no basis
for a quiet title action." (Id. at 15.)
4
Notably, Mr. Riach sought and partially received attorneys' fees, sanctions, and the
like. The court found as follows:
In considering Plaintiff's culpability and ability to pay, the Court finds
that Plaintiff must pay any costs and disbursements imposed in this
case, and must post a $2,000 cost bond before filing any action in
Minnesota in relation to the Maplewood property and/or the estate of
James H. Kayser. This is the least restrictive sanction to deter
Plaintiff's conduct. The Court notes that if Mr. Kayser and Ms.
Lazaryan were parties to this action, the Court would impose on them
the attorneys' fees of Riach, as well as the sanctions imposed on
Plaintiff.
(Id. at 14 -15.)
It is also worth noting that on September 19, 2005, William Kayser attempted to
effectuate service of the Complaint for Quiet Title upon the City of Maplewood
(on behalf of Ms. Wallace). It is our position that, however, that service was
improper and the City is not legally required to answer the complaint. Given the
seriousness of Mr. Kayser's actions, however, the City would nonetheless be
compelled to respond under normal circumstances. Although Judge Lynn has
dismissed Plaintiff s case, service was attempted prior to the issuance of his order
(albeit subsequent to the hearing for summary judgment).
Through multiple phone calls and correspondence with Plaintiff s attorney, our
office has negotiated the following (temporary) resolution. Plaintiff has agreed to
grant the City an indefinite extension to answer or otherwise plead on the matter.
In the alternative, Plaintiff will have the City dismissed from the current action, or
seek clarification that the City is already effectively dismissed. We have assured
Plaintiffs attorney that should the City be forced to file a response in this action it
will seek costs, attorneys' fees and sanctions.
It is our position that this suit, like its predecessors, is without merit. We believe
the numerous court rulings on the matter confirm this. It is our opinion that the
property that the City now wishes to assess was owned by the estate of James
Kayser and properly conveyed to Benchmark Companies and Nedegaard Custom
Homes, Inc. We do not believe that Evelyn Wallace, William Kayser or Nancy
4 It is not this fact that we believe constitutes ineffective service, but rather Plaintiff s failure to properly amend the
Complaint.
Lazaryan hold any interest in the property.
ADDITIONAL ASSURANCES
In its Development Agreement for Woodhill Development City Project 05 -10, the
Developer Nedegaard "warrants that he is the owner of the property proposed for
the construction of the Woodhill development and maintains all rights and
obligations necessary to construct the said improvements and to incur any property
obligations." (Agreement at 1, ¶ 1.) The Developer further agrees to "reimburse
any costs incurred by the City for engineering, legal, and administrative services,
associated with the project." (Id. at 3, ¶ 7). The Developer further agrees as
follows:
the City of Maplewood City Council and its agents or employees shall
not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to... any other
person or persons whomsoever, for any claim demand, damages,
actions or causes of action of any kind or character arising out of or by
reason of the execution of this agreement or the performance and
completion of the work or the improvements provided herein, which
the DEVELOPER will save the CITY harmless from such claims,
demands, damages, actions or causes of action or the costs
disbursements and expenses of defending the same, specifically
including... costs of legal services rendered in connection with
defending such claims as may be brought against the CITY.
(Id. at 5, ¶ 18.) Although the foregoing provides the City certain protections and
assurances, we do not base our recommendation on them. Rather, we submit our
recommendation based on our understanding of the relevant facts and application
of law.
SUMMARY
It is our opinion that the property the City now wishes to assess was owned by the
estate of James Kayser and properly conveyed to Benchmark Companies and
Nedegaard Custom Homes, Inc. This is remains our position notwithstanding the
numerous lawsuits filed on behalf of Evelyn Wallace, William Kayser and Nancy
Lazaryan to the contrary. Accordingly, we believe the dedication of certain land to
the City, as well as the notice and assessment of land addressed herein and
contemplated at this time, is both legal and proper.
6
Ownership Information
• From: Robert Cardinal
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 10:14 PM
To: Chuck Ahl
Subject: FW: Ownership Information
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: William Kayser [mailto:kayser100 @comcast.net]
Sent: Thu 11/3/2005 10:31 AM
To: Robert Cardinal
Cc:
Subject: Ownership Information
Mayor Cardinal,
About 12 minutes into the public hearing on October 24, 2005, you
questioned Mr. Ahl regarding the fact that only Al Jerovik and Benchmark
Properties were noticed regarding their opportunity to present an
objection to the assessment. While I was filling out the required form,
you questioned Mr. Ahl by saying, "Just for our edification here,
Benchmark Properties and Al Jerovik are the only two that are on the
assessment rolls?'
Mr. Ahl replied to your question by stating, "Those are the information
that we have as to the ownership from Ramsey County."
This statement by Charles Ahl was both crucial and (I believe) a lie.
It was crucial because you and the council relied on it as a basis for
your subsequent vote. If Mr. Ahl was to have told you and the council
the truth, I believe that he would have said something like, "Although
Ramsey County told me that Evelyn Wallace owned the property, I chose to
ignore Ramsey County and act as if Ramsey County had told me what I
wanted to hear in hopes that I could deny knowledge of the fact that
Evelyn Wallace was improperly removed from our assessment rolls, and
claim that Benchmark Properties was properly added to our assessment
rolls." Of course, there are many other ways that Mr. Ahl could have
spoken the truth, but I believe that none of those truthful ways include
what he actually said at the 12 minute mark of that October 24th public
hearing.
There is no need for you to take my word on this. Call Ramsey County
yourself (or have your secretary call). The number is 651- 266 -2000, and
hit 0. When a person answers (usually about 5 minutes) ask them who
owns PID 13- 28 -22 -12 -0010, which is also 2516 Linwood Ave. E. I suspect
that person will tell you that Evelyn Wallace owns that property.
After you do this, you can go to Mr. Ahl and say, "At the last council
Ownership Information
meeting, you told me that you based the assessment rolls on ownership
information from Ramsey County. Who or what in Ramsey County gave you
the information that Benchmark Properties owned that property that we
voted to assess ?"
I suspect that Mr. Ahl will not answer your question. I suspect that He
will be evasive. I believe that he will not be able to answer your
question because he lied to you.
Of course, I might be wrong. Perhaps there actually is someone in
Ramsey County who told Mr. Ahl that Benchmark Properties owned that
propertiy. If so, please let me know Mr. Ahl's source of this
information in Ramsey County.
Sincerely,
Bill Kayser
Agenda Item K8
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer
SUBJECT: Valley View Avenue Drainage Concerns — City Project 05 -36 — Consider
Authorizing Storm Water Ponding Investigation and Authorize Project Funding
DATE: November 3, 2005
INTRODUCTION
During the storm of October 4 -5, 2005, a couple of properties on Valley View Avenue experienced property
and home flooding. Preliminary discussions indicated a blockage of the outlet caused a backup in the
area. Some long term maintenance activity and improvements may be needed to insure the blockage does
not occur again. Additional investigation is needed as well. While the storm was close to a 100 -year
event, our systems are designed to handle these types of events without danger to structures. These
homes have experienced previous close calls and some evidence of grading in the ponding area in the
early 1990's warrants investigation. A study to identify the overall system operation is recommended.
Background
Attached are a -mails from the residents who experienced flooding in early October. Our system should
have handled this event without any danger of flooding. The rainfall ranged from 4.5 to 6 inches within a 4-
7 hour period. Typically a 100 -year event is defined as 5.9 inches of rainfall over a 24 hour period.
However, we attempt to design a system with 2 -3 feet of safety for homes, so this October event exceeded
our system. A study of the drainage area and confirmation of the storm capacity will range in cost from
$15,000 to $20,000. Our environmental utility fund was established to handle these types of expenses.
Budget Impact
This was not a budgeted item; however, we created a line item within the Environmental Utility Fund for
consultant services. It is proposed to transfer $20,000 to a project fund and authorize the City Engineer to
have one of our consultants from the consultant pool conduct this study.
Nx8101MI MI:Iki UL1111I[a]ki
It is recommended that the city council authorize a Storm Water Pond and Drainage Study of the Valley
View Avenue Drainage Area and direct the Finance Director to transfer $20,000 from the Environmental
Utility to a Project Fund.
Attachment:
1. Resident E -mails
From: Mark Sandquist /NotesOne
To: 10/29/2005 09:30 AM
chuck.ahl @ci.maplewood.mn.us,
melinda.coleman @ci.maplewood.mn.us,
citycouncil @ci.maplewood.mn us,
duwayne.konewko @ci.maplewood.mn.us,
bryan.nagel @ci.maplewood.mn us,
erik.oswald @ci.maplewood.mn us
cc robynsandquist @qwest.net
Subject Fw: [Fwd: October Flooding]
Chuck,
Thank you for your prompt and courteous note. We appreciate the attention you
and others are giving this situation. We do realize that local governments can
not, nor should they be expected to, resolve all of it's residents issues. In
fact, Robyn and I have never asked the city for anything prior to this incident.
The reason we contacted you was to explain our concern regarding the drainage
issue in question. To our knowledge, this can only be addressed by the
government agency responsible for this function, namely, the City of Maplewood.
Please allow me to address the questions /issues raised below:
1. Drainage area
When we moved into our new home several years ago, our new neighbors told us
that the drainage easement had been filled in 2 years prior to our building on
our lot. I understand that this is second hand information, but I believe your
research will discover that it is indeed correct. Anecdotal evidence of this
action was the fact that several large trees in and /or near the drainage area
died soon after we moved in. We are not tree experts, however, we believe a
possible cause of the trees dying was the direct affect of additional soils
being placed around the base of the trees when the area was filled in to a
greater extent. We understood from our neighbors that the reason for the
additional fill being placed into the drainage area was that there were some
folks in the neighborhood that felt the area held water for too long of a
period. Once again, we believe that this occurred prior to our arrival, but we
have no official documented evidence. We look forward to your research on this
topic.
The reason this becomes a critical issue is rather obvious. If the drainage
area was altered from its original design, perhaps this altered design has lead
to some unintended consequences. Please understand, this is a critical question
for us. We could have raised an issue regarding the loss of trees after we
moved in, we chose not to, but we remain very concerned that the current system
is somehow modified from its original specifications and that concerns us.
2. Current situation /fault/ financial remuneration Since the evening of the
storm, we have invested several hours of work and some monies restoring our
basement to a useful condition. Much of the manual labor has been our own. We
have rented and purchased carpet cleaning equipment, fans and other materials to
complete this work. I believe we are now close to being able to fully utilize
the area as we have in the past. We are very interested in any funds that may
be available to help offset the expenses we have incurred.
We look forward to your response as to what may be available to compensate us
for reasonable expenses incurred. We are not aware of any additional structural
or cosmetic damages at this time. However, as we progress with some additional
inspections, we may discover some. Please let us know when the insurance
adjuster will contact us for a visit.
3. Regular maintenance, inspection of the system We understand the large task
at hand in maintaining and inspecting all aspects of a very large storm drainage
system. We fully understand that "once every hundred year storms" happen
infrequently. But the fact is that it did happen and the system failed. Our
concern is that the system is adequate and functioning properly. We appreciate
your review and inspection of the current system and look forward to your
response as to what measure, if any, will be taken to rectify the issue, if in
fact there is an issue to rectify.
4. Health /Mold issue
Thank you for your response as to this potential issue. We look forward to
working with the insurance adjuster on this issue as well. Also, please have
Mr. Konewko contact us to arrange for the monitoring you reference.
Thanks again for your response and concern. We look forward to working together
to develop a mutually agreeable solution.
Mark Sandquist
- - - -- Message from "Chuck Ahl" <Chuck.Ahl @ci.maplewood.mn us> on Sun, 23 Oct
2005 11:48:06 -0500 - - - --
To: "Robyn Sandquist" <robynsandquist @qwest.net>
cc: "Richard Fursman" < Richard .Fursman @ci.maplewood.mn.us >, "Melinda Coleman"
< Melinda .Coleman @ci.maplewood.mn.us >, "City Council"
<CityCouncil @ci.maplewood.mn.us >, nancy.blomquist @comcast.net, "DuWayne
Konewko" <DuWayne.Konewko @ci.maplewood.mn.us >, "Bryan Nagel"
< Bryan .Nagel @ci.maplewood.mn.us >, "Erick Oswald"
< Erick .Oswald @ci.maplewood.mn.us>
Sub]. RE: October Flooding
Mark and Robyn:
Thank you for your message. We take all flooding problems very seriously. Any
claims you have against the City should be referred to me. I will forward them
to our insurance carrier.
I am not aware of the City filling any of the area in the past 10 -15 years, but
will investigate the issues further. As I assured Mr.
Blomquist when I talked to him on October 6th, two days after the big rain
event, we will be following up on this drainage issue. The City also maintains
a fund to assist homeowners with water damage clean up, even though our position
may be that the flooding was beyond our control. If you still have wet carpet,
please let me know. That issue of fault, is something that we will need to ask
an insurance adjuster to investigate. My experience tells me that the City's
maintenance staff and thus, the City's taxpayers, had no more ability to keep
the large landscaping timbers and fireplace wood out of the outlet than you as a
homeowner. We regularly maintain the system and periodically check all of our
outlets. Was yours checked the day or week before the storm, the answer is no.
We have over 1,000 outlets within the system and cannot check them when we are
not aware of persistent problems.
I know that this may sound like a government run around. It is not. As I
originally noted, we take your issue and that of your neighbor's, the
Blomquists, very seriously. I believe that we have a problem. You are correct
that we have had a number of heavy storms in the past two years that have caused
possible flooding. As a matter of hydrologic planning, we have had three storms
in the 50 -100 year recurrence range in the past two years. (As a note, this
only means we have a 1 -2 "; chance of these storms happening in any year, not that
they happen only once in 50 -100
years) I was not aware of your problem with the flooding in the Valley View
area from two years ago. At this point, we have a problem that needs to be
addressed. I will be asking the City Council for funds at their meeting on
November 19th to identify methods to protect the outlet from the type of
blockages that occurred on Oct. 9th. This is what I mentioned to Mr. Blomquist
on October 6th. This will also include an engineering evaluation of the drainage
system in your area to identify if the pending system, which is supposed to be
designed to avoid flooding of structures as occurred at your home and at the
Blomquists.
The results of this investigation should help us program improvements to the
outlet and possibly changes needed to the drainage area. We will keep you
informed of the findings and the proposed solutions. I fully expect that we
will be implementing these improvements in the Spring of
2006 to avoid further problems to your homes and property. In the meantime, our
maintenance staff have added this outlet to their program to check regularly for
blockages. We were out during the evening of Oct 9th during and immediately
following this big storm event. We will continue this responsive effort with
our maintenance crews to help to avoid any further flooding damage to your home.
I sympathize with your flooding problems, and again, we should refer any cleanup
costs to our insurance carrier for consideration as to whether the City had
complicity in causing this. The adjustor will also want to visit with you to
understand your perspective on these issues. Please submit any costs to me for
coordination. We also have a health officer, Dewey Konekwo, on our staff that
can assist you with any monitoring of mold issues within your home. I have
copied him on this e -mail and as part of a cleanup cost, the City will pay for a
first round of monitoring to see if you have health issues due to the water
entering your home.
You can contact me either via e -mail, which is best, or at my office at 651 -299-
2902.
Chuck Ahl
Charles Ahl, P.E.
Director of Public Works /City Engineer
City of Maplewood
1902 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
651- 299 -2902
651- 299 -2909 (fax)
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Robyn Sandquist [mailto:robynsandquist @qwest.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 11:39 PM
To: Robert Cardinal; Richard Fursman; Chuck Ahl; Melinda Coleman; Will Rossbach
Subject: October Flooding
Since calling the city and emailing about the flooding problem, I have had no
responses back from the city. During my phone call immediately after the
flooding, I do not feel addressing the building of my neighbors' walkout part
of my flooding problem and felt it was used as an excuse. I am across the
street at 2599 Valley View Avenue. We have been here for 13 years. I have
watched the easement area during all rainfalls to be sure is not plugged and not
in danger of coming to the house. I also am aware that the year before we built
here, you, the city, filled in the area of our easement of dirt bringing the
level up.
What happened then, is a year after we built, all the trees in the area you
filled died from the roots suffocating. At that time, my husband tackled the
job of cutting down over 8 trees from our lovely wooded lot.
Several years ago we had another of our supposedly 1 in 75 -100 year major rains.
I called you then to warn you that it was up to my deck and about 3 feet from
my house. My neighbor to the west of me had water right up to his house.
I got the pat answer that this will not happen again. Well, it did.
And even though I maintain my outlet and also was out during the storm
maintaining it, the backup across the pond caused our area to overflow street
level and come up 5 inches at the back of my house. I am not a walkout. I have
windows that are above ground in the back and the water came in. One room is my
husbands home office which is used daily. We also have computer equipment in
this room. The fact that this is happening more often, I feel that the system
in place is not adequate protection for us homeowners. Our insurance will not
cover any of this damage. Where the water came into my windows, it went down
the walls and is in the insulation behind the drywall. THis needs to be tested
and accessed. We need to be sure that there is no mold growing behind the
walls.
Also, the storm we had several years ago was very much like this last one. I
was out during that one and also went across the street to check it out. It was
in no way as large as this one was because of the backup. We were warned of
this storm. Were these areas checked before the storm to prevent flooding? Do
the owners, and many are new to the neighborhood, know to help keep these areas
free of logs and leaves? Do we need to pay for the lack of maintenance from the
city and other people. I would like an answer. I have already spent hours
drying out my basement and money on rental equipment to extract the water.
There is more to be done and I feel someone needs to address this issue. I
would really like an answer and response to my flooding.
Sincerely,
Mark and Robyn Sandquist
From: Chuck Ahl
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 8:00 AM
To: 'nancy.blomquist @ comcast.net'
Cc: Richard Fursman; Melinda Coleman; Robert Cardinal
Subject: Flood Damage
Nancy:
You should itemize your claims for cleanup and submit them to me. I will coordinate this to our
insurance carrier. You should also notify your insurance carrier that you are making a claim
against the City.
It is always unfortunate when flooding occurs. You need to know that the City's position with the
insurance company will be that the flooding was caused by a situation that we could not avoid. A
rainfall event of 4.5 to 6.0 inches of rain in a 4 -6 hour period that occurred on Oct 4th is
considered a 75 -100+ year event. Your flooding was caused by this extensive amount of rainfall.
It backed up into the drainage easement that you and the City debated about alterations and the
walkout features of your home in 2003. It is for rainfall events like this that the City maintains and
attempts to protect these easements from the alterations that occurred in 2003. The heavy
nature of the Oct 4th rainfall washed numerous landscaping and firewall debris from your
neighborhood into the outlet causing further backups. Upon notification, our public works crews
were able to access the outlet and within a few hours, the flood waters subsided. We had
numerous ponds within Maplewood, and I know within this entire region, that experienced high
flood levels due to the intensity of the storm event. The debris wash outs are typical of the event
and our crews did the best effort possible to make sure that the drainage system remained as
free of blockages as possible. Since the City could not be expected to anticipate that your
neighborhood's debris would cause the outlet to be restricted, the insurance company may
conclude that the City is not liable foryour damage. When I talked to your husband on October
6th, I assured him that we would continue to look at ways to keep debris from the drain during
future events. We always review our systems for improvements. We typically will provide a
service to help clean up flood damage during backups. That usually involves a service such as
Service Master removing and drying the carpet. This is still available to you. Any permanent
damage will be referred to our insurance carrier for investigation. I provided the above
explanation so that you do not think that we are automatically going to pay for your claims. My
experience is that your claim against the City will be denied; however, it is something that we
should have them review to be sure that they concur.
If have listed my contact information below for submission of your claims. You can contact me at
the telephone number below if you wish, although it is typically easiest to communicate to me
through a -mail.
Chuck Ahl
Charles Ahl, P.E.
Director of Public Works /City Engineer
City of Maplewood
1902 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
651 - 249 -2402
651 - 249 -2409 (fax)
From: Nancy Blomquist [mailto:nancy.blomquist @comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 9:30 PM
To: Robert Cardinal
Cc: Richard Fursman; Chuck Ahl; Melinda Coleman
Subject: RE:
Bob, we need to speak directly with the person /s who have been designated to dealing with the
extensive flood damage residence in our area have experienced in the recent storms. The wait
has been long enough. It is now time for the City of Maplewood to correct the damage that has
been done through compensation and repair. Our basement is unusable due to the dampness
and odor caused by the water that saturated our carpet, under pad and walls. We would like this
matter addressed by the end of business Friday October 21, 2005. There are very young
children in our home and illness as well as the real possibility of the condition in the basement
triggering our son's asthma is a serious concern. We need answers immediately.
Nancy and Joe Blomquist
From: Robert Cardinal [mailto:robert .cardinal @ci.maplewood.mn.us]
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 10:45 PM
To: nancy.blomquist @comcast.net
Cc: Richard Fursman; Chuck Ahl; Melinda Coleman
Subject: RE:
Nancy & Joe, This will be addressed ASAP. -- Bob cardinal
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Nancy Blomquist [ mailto :nancy.blomquist(acomcastnet]
Sent: Fri 10/14/2005 8:36 AM
To: Robert Cardinal
Cc:
Subject:
We along with several of our neighbours on Valley View Avenue East in South
Maplewood have extensive flood damage from the recent storms due to an outlet that
was not maintained properly. The outlet was jammed with huge railway lumber as well
as large tree stumps and other debris. We would like to know what the process is for
residence with extensive flood damage to their homes. Asthma is a very big concern with
the children in these homes not to mention the other illnesses that could become a reality
as a result of any further delay. Please contact us immediately with the proper contact
information. We have searched the City of Maplewood web -site without success at
finding any information.
Sincerely,
Nancy and Joseph Blomquist
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti- Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.14/131 - Release Date: 10/12/2005
Agenda Item K9
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer
Erin Laberee, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Kennard Street Improvements (Beam to County Road D) — City Project 03-04 -
Resolution for Modification of Existing Landscape Contract, Change Order No.
2
DATE: November 4, 2005
INTRODUCTION
A contract for the roadway construction of Kennard Street between Beam Avenue and County Road D was
awarded on September 8, 2003. A second contract for landscape improvements was awarded on April 26,
2004. During construction there are often unforeseen changes or unanticipated changes in conditions from
the original plans for which the engineer must direct the contractor to perform additional work or provide
additional materials. The city council will consider approving the attached resolutions directing the
modification of the existing landscaping contract, Change Order No. 2.
Background
The original landscape contract is with Nobel Nursery Retail, Inc. in the amount of $219,877.96 for the
Kennard Street landscaping. Change Order No. 1, dated November 3, 2003, was in the amount of
$33,114.59. Change Order No. 2 is for $2,870.00. This change order includes additional trees and shrubs
that were added to the Hazelwood median, just north of Beam Avenue in conjunction with the Hazelwood
Street Improvement Project which did not include landscaping items. The additional landscape work has
been added to the Kennard Street Improvement Project landscape contract with Nobel Nursery.
See the attached memos from SEH.
Budget Impact
No increase in the project budget is required as these extras still fall within the original approved budget.
Nx8101MI MI:1ki UL1111 III [a]ki I
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution for Change Order No. 2 in the
amount of $2,870.00 with Nobel Nursery Retail, Inc. for the landscaping contract of Kennard Street — City
Project 03 -04.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Change Order 2 — Memo from SEH
3. Location Map
Agenda Item K9
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Project 03 -04, Kennard Street Landscape Improvements, and has let a landscape
contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said landscape contract be modified
and designated as Landscape Improvement, Project 03 -04, Change Order No. 2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the
existing contract by executing said Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $2,870.00. The revised
contract amount is $255,862.55.
No revisions to the project budget are proposed at this time as these changes fall
within the original project budget.
SEH
Ocmbor 26, 2005
RP: Maplewood, Minnesota
Kennard Street Improvements
Landscaping, Paving, Lighting 4 "0 JIdUiI
and hrizatioul
SLI-I No. A-MAPLE0104.01
City of Maplewood
Public Works Doparifflent
1902 County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Ann: Erin LaBerco
Assistant City Engineer
Doar Erm:
Please find enclosed Application for Payment No, 3 for the referenced project. The quantities cornpLted
to date have been reviewed and we hereby recommend approval for payment in the amount of 5 - 1 S06,30.
Channe Order No. 2 is being submitted at this time for approval, with payment to be incorporated with
the next pay application (No. 4).
Please forward payment in the aniount of 57,806.30, along evith signed copies of di- enclosed documents,
to Noble Nunwry Retail. 514.
Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions or Comments. Thank you
Sincerely,
Veronica A. Ande-rSOIL.
Project Manager
11to
Enclosures
A
SEH
CHANGE ORDER
3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 551105196
651.490.2000 800.325.2055 851.490.2150 FAX
City of Maplewood October 5, 2005
Owner Date
03 -04
Owner Project No.
Kennard Street Improvements, Kennard Street - Legacy Parkway Landscaping,
Paving Lighting Conduit, & Irrigation
Project Name
The following changes shall be made to the contract documents:
Descriotlon:
1 Add trees to Hazelwood median.
2 Add shrubs to Hazelwood median.
3 Add mulch.
2
Change Order No.
A- MAPLE0304.01
SEH File Na
Basis of Cost:
® Actual ❑ Estimated
Attachments (list supporting documents)
Contract Status
Time
Cost
Original Contract
7- May -04
$219,877.96
Net Change Prior COs 1 to 2
N/A
$33,114.59
Change this Change Order
N/A
$2,870.00
Revised Contract
$255,862.55
f ,
Recommended for Approval: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
,n n
By:
Veronica A. Anderson
Agreed to by Contractor."
Title
Approved for Owner:
City of Maplewood
t
Engineering Division Date
City Administrator Date
Mayor Date
Distribution Contractor Owner Project Representative SEH Office
CHANGE ORDER NO.2
ITEM SCHEDULE
SEH No: A- MAPLP.0304.01. Location: Maplewood, Minnesota
C.P. No, 03 -04
Contractor: Noble Nursery Retail, Inc.
8659 Central Avenue
Blaine, MN 554
Contract for: Kennard Street Improvements, Kennard Street - Legacy Parkway
Landscaping, Paving, Lighting Conduit, & Irrigation
Change Order
Date: October 5, 2005
Owner: City of M
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109 -2702
Original Contract
Amount: $219,877.96
Revised Contract
Amount: $255,862.55
Item
Quantity
No Item
Unit
Est. Qty,
to Date
Unit Price
Total
Increased Contract Quantities
1
Profusion Crab Apple (2" CAL B &B)
EA
3
3
$250.00
$750.00
2
Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle ( #5 CONT)
EA
48
48
$40.00
$1,920.00
3
Shredded Hardwood Mulch
CY
5
5
$40.00
$200.00
Total Increases
$2,870.00
Change Order Item Schedule atp3 ..fp3.1.0O2dera,1
CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
FOR
LANDSCAPING, PAVING, LIGHTING CONDUIT, AND IRRIGATION
KENNARD STREET IMPROVEMENTS
KENNA" STREET - LEGACY PARKWAY
FROM BEAM AVENUE TO COUNTY ROAD D
CITY PROJECT NO. 03 -04
ATION
OW ERSTATEOIICP LDYSTEM__tA AE?41.
NOTE.
TH[ EXACT LIXAFIONOE UNDERGEOUNC( LIVES OUCH AS GAS, TELEPHONE. FSEkOTIC
ELECTPoC CABLE W AND PIPE 41 NES ARE UNKNOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SNETLL COWACT
'OPHER STATE ONE C41 SEFORC COMMENCING EXCAVATION .
Agenda Item K10
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager, Richard Fursman
FROM: Assistant City Manager, Melinda Coleman
SUBJECT: Legacy Village, Release from Master Development Agreement
and Waiver of City Requirements /Development Agreement;
Ramsey County Library
DATE: November 7. 2005
I.I Mal N Mle III [a].I
Legacy Holdings, or the Hartrford Group, is requesting 2 approvals from the City
Council. The first is a request for release of Hartford, as Master Developer, to Ramsey
County to become successor developer. This will allow Hartford to sell the property to
Ramsey County for a new library and transfer the requirements of the development
agreement to the County. The second request is to approve an exemption to the
building permit requirement in Section 6.2(e) of the Master Development Agreement and
authorize the payment of the city's portion of the assignments levied against the property
pursuant to the proposed escrow agreement or at time of closing.
REQUIREMENTS
The overall Master Development Agreement requires the Master Developer, Hartford, to
receive approval from the city to assign responsibilities and transfer property. In this
case, Hartford needs to submit evidence of financing and the issuance of a building
permit for the improvements on the library development before the city will pay its share
of the special assessments levied against the library site. The County and Hartford are
requesting that the City grant a waiver on the building permit requirement and allow the
County to go ahead and purchase the property and pay the special assessments by
November 15` If the assessments are not paid by November 15` interest on the
assessments will increase and the city will need to approve an escrow agreement to
guarantee that the funds get paid at time of building permit issuance.
Staff has discussed this waiver request with County staff and bond counsel and we
agree that there are reasons to approve this request. First, the Ramsey County Board
has entered into an agreement with the Hartford Group to purchase the new library site,
second, they have requested and City Council approved the PUD revision and third,
architects and engineers have begun schematic design of the project. See letter
(Attachment 1) from the Director of Property Management, Jolly Mangine, for additional
information on the County's intentions and timeframe. Also included are the Ramsey
County Board Resolutions authorizing purchase and expenditures for this project.
(Attachment 2) In summary, we find that the library project is a government project and
is different than a private development as there will not be new tax base created for the
city. In addition, the County has made a significant commitment and expended funds
toward this project, prior to final city approvals.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Release of Obligations under Master Development
Agreement (Attachment 3). In addition, staff recommends approval of the waiver of
Section 6.2(e) of the Master Development Agreement that requires that a building permit
be issued prior to the City paying its share of the special assessments. In short, these
approvals will allow Hartford and the County to close on the property on November 15`
This will result in cost savings to the project by eliminating additional interest on the
assessments and will give the County the property so they can proceed towards project
completion.
If the City Council does not approve the waiver, a Special Assessment Agreement will
be required. Staff will have this agreement prepared and available at the City Council
meeting should it be necessary.
I November 2005
Property Management
Julio A, hlangine, Director
660 Government Center West
50 West Kellogg Boulevard
St. Paul, \IN 55102 -1657
Ms.. Melinda Coleman
Community Development Director
Maplewood Assistant City Manager
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Ms. Coleman;
Tel: 651- 266 -2260
Fax: 651- 266 -2264
Ramsey County is excited to relocate one of our county libraries within the City of Maplewood. We know that much
planning and action have occurred over the last several months. To demonstrate the County's commitment to this
project, let me reiterate recent activities:
L We have entered into an agreement with the Hartford Group to purchase the new library site within the Legacy
Village Development. We have worked with them and your staff to clearly outline our vision for how the
building will work on the site.
2. This vision was recently presented to the Maplewood City Council in the October PUD Revision meeting.
3. The Library Board has selected, and the County Board has ratified, the selection of a design/ build team.
4. McGough/HGA Architects & Engineers began Schematic Design on the project.
5. We are actively marketing the existing library property and hope to arrange a purchase for possession in early
2007.
We expect to complete Schematic Design in early December and bring this design before the Community Design
Review Board for approval by year's end. In 2006, we anticipate:
A. Approving a fully funded project budget in February, then breaking ground in March.
B. Substantially completing the building and moving the present library collection in the late fall.
C. Opening the new Maplewood Library to the public by February 2007.
Through these past and future actions, we hope you see we are earnest and actively moving forward to develop the new
site. Please assure the City Council of the County's sincere intentions to quickly develop this site.
Feel free to contact me with any follow -up questions.
Sincerely,
` `Jolly Mangine, irec
Property Management
Ramsey County
Attachment 1
Minnesota's First Rome Rule County
pemted on recycled paper with a minimum of 10 %p eencomemmor content
HP
Resolution Attachment
Ramsey County Commissioners
Presented By Commissioner Wiessner Date March 16, 2004No,. 2004 -114
Attention: Budgeting and Accounting
Alice -Jo Carlson, Ramsey County Library
Jolly Mangine, Property Management Page Iof2
WHEREAS, On December 18, 2003, the Ramsey County Board of
Commissioners approved the 2004 Ramsey County Budget, which included debt
service to finance $12,490,000 for Phase I of the Ramsey County Library Capital
Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, During the 2004 Budget hearings, the Library shared a memo dated
October 27, 2003, outlining a three phase Capital Improvement Plan approved by the
Library Board on October 22, 2003; and
WHEREAS The Ramsey County Library Board approved Phase I of the Capital
Improvement Plan, library projects in North St. Paul (Project A), Maplewood (Project B)
and Roseville (Project C) on October 22, 2003; and
WHEREAS, On February 18, 2004, the Ramsey County Library Board authorized
the Library Director to request the County Board of Commissioners to issue $9,750,000
in General Obligation Bonds for the Ramsey County Library Capital Budget; Now,
Therefore, Be It
RESOLVED, The Ramsey County Board of Commissioners accepts and
approves the Ramsey County Library Capital Improvement Project Budgets for Phase I,
and Library Capital Improvement Schedules for Projects B and C in Phase 1; and Be It
Further
RESOLVED, the County Board hereby approves the sale of $9,750,000 in
General Obligation Bonds to finance Projects B and C in Phase 1 of the Ramsey County
Library Capital Improvement Plan 2004 -2008: the land acquisition, design, construction
and technology of the library projects in Maplewood and Roseville; and Be It Further
RESOLVED, This action does not commit the County Board to capital projects in
Phase 11 or Phase III of the Library's Capital improvement Plan; and Be It Further
RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
YEA NAY OTHER
Tony Bennett
ie Haigh
Jim McDonough
Rafael Ortega
Victoria Reinhardt
Janice Rettman
Jan Wiessner
Victoria A_ Reinhardt, Chair
(Continued)
0
Bonnie C. Jackelen
Chief Clerk - County Board
Resolution
Ramsey County Commissioners
Presented By Commissioner Wiessner Date March 16 2004No. 2004 -114
Attention: Budgeting and Accounting
Alice -Jo Carlson, Ramsey County Library
Jolly Mangine, Property Management Page 2 of 2
RESOLVED, The County Board directs the County Manager and Property
Management to work with the Library to identify project management responsibilities
and a communication plan for Phase I of the Library's Capital Improvement Plan, and
report to the County Board; and Be It Further
RESOLVE, The County Board directs Property Management to work with the
Library to issue a Request for Proposal for Design Services for Phase I, Projects B and
C in accordance with appropriate County Board policies and to return to the County
Board for ratification of any contracts; and Be It Further
RESOLVED, The County Board directs the County Manager and Property
Management to take any and all steps necessary to acquire property required to
implement Project C, the Roseville project, including eminent domain within the
approved budget for land acquisition and return to the County Board for approval of a
final purchase agreement; and Be It Further
RESOLVED, The County Board authorizes the County Manager to make all
necessary budget adjustments and payments within the approved budgets for the
Ramsey County Library Capital improvement Plan for the Maplewood (Project B) and
Roseville (Project C) Library projects.
r
t
RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSION
YEA NAY OTHER
Tony Bennett X
Sue Haigh –
Jim McDonough X
Rafael Ortega X
Victoria Reinhardt X
Janice Reitman _ x
.Tan Wiessner _Ya—.
Victoria A. Reinhardt, Chair
B
Bonnie C. Sack n
Chief Clerk - ty Board
Resolution
Board of
Ramsey County Commissioners
Presented By _ Commissioner Parker _______— Date-, July 12, 2005 No. 2005 -263__
Attention: Budgeting and Accounting
Susan Nemitz, Ramsey County Library Page 1of3
Jolly Mangine, Property Management
Rob Fulton Public Health
WHEREAS, On October 5, 2004, the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners
ratified the Ramsey County Library Board's design team selection for the $7.9 million
expansion and renovation of the Maplewood Branch Library at 1670 Beam Avenue,
Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, The Schematic Phase Cost Estimate prepared by the design team
for the renovation and expansion of the Maplewood Branch Library exceeded the $7.9
million Project Budget approved as part of the Librarys Phase t Capital Improvement
Program; and
WHEREAS, The Schematic Design Phase confirmed that expanding the library
building on the existing site would require finding additional public and staff parking
away from the library site; and
WHEREAS, On February 28, 2005, the Ramsey County Library Board directed
Library Administration and Property Management to explore an alternative new sitelnew
Building program that could utilize the $7.9 million project budget more effectively; and
WHEREAS, On May 18, 2005, Ramsey County Library Administration and
Property Management made a presentation to the Ramsey County Library Board on the
status of the new site/new building program alternative which included the identification
and pre - qualification of several Maplewood sites; and
WHEREAS, On May 18, 2045, the Ramsey County Library Board approved the
new site/new building program alternative for the Maplewood Branch Library; and
RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
YEA e NAY OTHER
" , ny Bennett _ —_ --
ai Carter
Jina McDonough _—
Rafael Ortega
Jan Parker —_
Victoria Reinhardt
Janice Rettman
Victoria A. Reinharrt, Chair
(Continued)
UZ
Bonnie C. Jackelen
Chief Clerk - County Board
NMI i
Board of
Ramsey County Commissioners
Presented By_ Commissioner Parker Date July 12, 2005No. 2005 -263
Attention: Budgeting and Accounting
Susan Nemitz , Ramsey County Library Page 2 of 3
Jolly Mangine, Property Management
Rob Fulton, Public Health
WHEREAS, On June 7, 2005, the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners
ratified the Ramsey County Library Board's decision to proceed with a new site./new
building program for the Maplewood Branch Library and authorized Property
Management to enter into negotiations to purchase a new site in Maplewood and return
to the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners with a Purchase Agreement, an
estimated Project Budget not to exceed the original total of $7,911,500 excluding land
acquisition, Project Schedule, and a Financing Plan for the new building; and
WHEREAS, After investigating a number of available north Maplewood sites, the
Library and Property Management determined that a site within a new development
known as the "Legacy Village of Maplewood" would be a preferred site for the new
Maplewood Branch Library-, and
WHEREAS, The Library and Property Management have negotiated a purchase
agreement with Legacy Holdings -MW, LLC in the amount of $2,048,300. Based on the
site selection, Property Management has prepared an estimated Project Budget that
does not exceed the original total of $7,911,500, Project Schedule, and a Financing
Plan for the new building; and
WHEREAS, On July 6, 2005, the Ramsey County Library Board approved the
purchase agreement with Legacy Holdings -MW, LLC in the amount of $2,045,800 and
accepted and approved the Project Budget, Project Schedule, and Financing Plan for
the new Maplewood Branch Library; Now, Therefore, Be It
RESOLVED, The Ramsey County Board of Commissioners hereby authorizes
and approves the purchase of the property located in the City of Maplewood, County of
Ramsey, State of Minnesota legally described as: Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Legacy Village
of Maplewood, between Legacy Holdings -MW, LLC ( "Seller"), a Minnesota corporation
or its assigns, and Ramsey County, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota
( "Buyer") for the sum of $2,048,300; and Be It Further
RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
YEA NAY OTHER
'"'any Bennett Victoria A. Reinhardt, Chair
mCarter _ ( Continued)
Rm McDonough
Rafael Ortega By
.ran Parker. Bonnie C. Jaekelen
Victoria Reinhardt Chief Clerk - County Board
Janice Rettman
Ramsey County Commissioners
Presented By .Commissione p arker Date Jul 12, 2005 No, 2045_263
Attention. ,Budgeting and Accounting
Susan Nemitz, .Ramsey County Library Page 3 of 3
Jolly Mangine, Property Management
Rob Fulton, Public Health
RESOLVED, The Ramsey County Board of Commissioners hereby authorizes
the Chair and Chief Cleric to sign and deliver the Real Estate Purchase Agreement on
behalf of the County, subject to prior approval by the County Attorney's Office, the
Ramsey County Library Director, and Property Management; and Be It Further
RESOLVED, The Ramsey County Board of Commissioners hereby authorizes
the County Manager to execute and deliver on its behalf all necessary documents
required by or deemed necessary to carry out the purposes of the Real Estate Purchase
Agreement, subject to prior approval by the County Attorney's Office; and Be It Further
r RESOLVED, The Ramsey County Board of Commissioners hereby authorizes
- and approves that the purchase price and all costs, taxes, charges or fees that Ramsey
County is required to pay at closing may be paid temporarily from the Ramsey County
Library Capital Improvement Program funds until the sale of the existing Maplewood
Library property at 9670 Beam Avenue; and Be It Further
RESOLVED, The Ramsey County Board of County Commissioners ratifies the
Library Board's acceptance and approval of the new Maplewood Branch Library Project
Schedule, Project Budget and Financing Plan, all dated July 6, 2005.
RAMSEY C OUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chair
YEA
_ NAY _ OTHER
"'onyBennett
_ _ A bsen t VlctonaA.Re
Ali Carter
X
Ji McDonough
m
� X
- - --
Rafael Ortega
X
BY
Ian Parker
X
Bonnie C.
Victoria Reinhardt
X
_
Chief Clec
Janice Rettman
X ...
Chair
Resolution
Ramsey County Commissioners
Presented By
Attention:
Commissioner Parker
Date Oc tober 25, __2005 No. 2Q45 394_
Budgeting and Accounting
Jolly Mangine, Property Management
Susan Nemitz, Ramsey county Library
WHEREAS, A Request for Proposals process was conducted in August and
September 2005 to select a Construction Manager /Design Team for the development of a
new Maplewood Library; and
WHEREAS, Following receipt of ten proposals, a five- member evaluation team
reviewed the submissions and selected five firms to interview; and
WHEREAS, The consultant group headefty McGough Construction, along with
HGA Architects & Engineers, was the evaluators' unanimous choice; and
WHEREAS, At their October 5, 2005 meeting, the Ramsey County Library Board
approved the evaluation team's recommendation of McGough /HGA, directed staff to
develop an owner - consultant agreement between the Ramsey County Library and
McGough Construction and authorized the Library Board President to sign the contract on
behalf of the Library Board; Now, Therefore, Be It
RESOLVED, The Ramsey County Board of Commissioners hereby ratifies the
selection by the Ramsey County Library Board of McGough Construction and HGA
Architects & Engineers, as the Construction Manager /Design "Team for the development
of a nn-w M a p 1 e_ W10 0 d Library.
RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIO
YEA NAY OTHER
Tony Bennett _ -
Toni Carter X
jim McDonough —,--X--
Rafael Ortega __Sent
Jan Parker -- -- ----
Victoria Reinhardt
Janice Rottman
Victoria A. Reinhardt, Chair
Bonnie C. Jackcie C_l
Chief Clerk - Board
Attachment 3
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RELEASE OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER
MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
RAMSEY COUNTY LIBRARY
I. Recital.
1.1 The Effective Date of this Agreement is 1 2005.
1.2 The Parties to this Agreement are City of Maplewood, Minnesota, a Minnesota
statutory city ( "City "), Legacy Holdings -MW LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company
( "Master Developer ") and Ramsey County, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota
( "Successor Developer ").
1.3 City and Master Developer are parties to a Master Development Agreement with
an effective date of September 8, 2003, recorded November 21, 2003 as Document No. 3704070
in the Office of the Ramsey County Recorder and recorded November 21, 2003 as Document
No. 1791278 in the Office of the Ramsey County Registrar of Titles, as amended by First
Amendment to Development Agreement with an effective date of February 9, 2004 and as
amended by a Second Amendment to Development Agreement with an effective date of April
26, 2005 ( "Master Development Agreement ").
1.4 Various real estate parcels are subject to the Master Development Agreement and
Successor Developer has entered into an Agreement with Master Developer to purchase one of
the parcels subject to the Master Development Agreement for the purpose of developing a
regional library project (the "Library Development "). Such parcel is referred to as 'Phase 613 —
Outlots D and E of the Plat" in the Master Development Agreement but is now legally described
as:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Legacy Village of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota (the "Subject
Parcel ").
178779612
7!7/05
1.5 In connection with the acquisition of the Subject Parcel, Master Developer has
requested to be released from the terms and conditions of the Master Development Agreement as
to the Subject Parcel pursuant to Section 9.3 of the Master Development Agreement.
1.6 City has approved the Subject Parcel for use consistent with the proposed Library
Development. On that basis, City is willing to release Master Developer from the terms and
conditions of the Master Development Agreement subject to Master Developer's
aclmowledgement of its obligations under Section 6.2 of the Master Development Agreement to
pay a part of the special assessments attributable to the Subject Parcel as set forth on Exhibit F to
the Master Development Agreement and its continuing obligations as to other parcels that remain
subject to the Master Development Agreement.
THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
II. Agreement.
2.1 From and after the effective date set forth above, Master Developer is released
from its obligations under the Master Development Agreement as to the Subject Parcel subject to
the following:
(a) Master Developer will comply with the terms of Section 6.2 of the Master
Development Agreement in connection with the payment of special assessments
attributable to the Subject Parcel; and
(b) Master Developer remains liable under the Master Development
Agreement as to all other parcels subject to the Master Development Agreement that are
not released hereby or previously released.
This document drafted by:
Briggs and Morgan, P.A. (DJC)
W2200 First National Bank Bldg.
332 Minnesota Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
(Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank)
178779612
7!7/05
Dated: 1 2005 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, a
Minnesota statutory city.
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2005, by the and , the
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota on behalf of said City.
Notary Public
[Separate Signature Page to Release of Obligations Under Master Development Agreement]
Dated: 2005 MASTER DEVELOPER:
LEGACY HOLDINGS -MW LLC, a Minnesota
limited liability company.
By:
Keith Gruebele
Its: Chief Financial Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
1 2005, by Keith Gruebele, the Chief Financial Manager of Legacy Holdings -MW LLC, a
Minnesota limited liability company on behalf of said limited liability company.
Notary Public
[Separate Signature Page to Release of Obligations Under Master Development Agreement]