Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998 09-28 City Council PacketI AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 28, 1998 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 98 -21 1. Minutes of Meeting 98 -20 (September 14, 1998) All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine b the City y Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. English Street Improvements, Project 96 -19 2. Approval of Claims 3. Non - Waiver of Statutory Liability Limits for Insurance 4. Transfer of Funds - City Clerk /Deputy Registrar Copier Replacement 5. Donation to Canine Program 6. Donation to Police Department 7. Livable Communities Act -1999 Participation 8. Oak Ridge Estates 4th Addition Final Plat (Montana Ave., east of Sterling St.) 9. Conditional Use Permit Review - 2696 Hazelwood Street (First Evangelical Free Church) 10. Conditional Use Permit Revision - Ramsey County Household Hazardous Waste Collection Site (Aldrich Arena) H. PUBLI . HEARTN,S 1. 7:00 P.M. Gladstone Meadows Preliminary Plat (Ide Street /Donna Senty Drive) - Land Use Plan Change (LBC to R -1S) (4 votes) - Zoning Map Change (LBC to R -1S) (4 votes) - Street Right -of -Way Vacation - Preliminary Plat 2. 7:20 P.M. Sprint PCS Telecommunications Tower (1221 Frost Avenue) - Conditional Use Permit - Design Approval 3. 7:30 P.M. Conditional Use Permit - Bond Enterprises (1420 County Road D) 4. 7:40 P.M. Battle Creek Regional Park Aquatic Facility (Battle Creek Regional Park - Upper Afton and McKnight Roads) - Wetland Setback Variance - Design Approval I. AWARD OF BIDS NONE J. AHNISHEM 1. Revision to Site Plan - Plaza 3000 (3000 White Bear Avenue) 2. Proposed Purchase of Bruentrup Farm K. NEW B �TNFSS 1. Ballot Referendum - Liquor License L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS OUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Committee Reports 2. 3. 4. Na ADMIN ST TIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. ,i D I MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 14, 1998 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 98 -20 A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Rossbach. George F. Rossbach, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present Kevin Kittridge, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present Councilmember Allenspach moved to awrove the minutes of SDecial Meetin No. 98-18 (Auciust 20, 1998-) as nted. is I Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all Counc-ilmember Carlson moved to amrove-the minutes of Meetin No. 98-19 (Auciust 2 1998) s eit e4. I a Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - a 11 Councilmember Carlson moved to awrove. the minutes of ---Council /Manager WorkshoQ (Auaust ••: ) as uesented Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge - Ayes - all Councilmember Rossbach moved to aDDrove the Agenda as amended M -1. Mayor's Mailbox IN M -2. Midsummers Night N -1. Schedule Special Meeting Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all NONE 9 -15 -98 1 Councilmember Kittrid moved, seconded- y Councilmember Carlson: ayes - all to awrove t he Consent A• - n!. Items G1-G11 as recommende,, 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 79,217.91 Checks #7600 thru #7605 dated 8 -18 -98 thru 8 -21 -98 103,809.74 Checks #39391 thru #39501 dated 8 -25 -98 66.332.85 Checks #7606 thru #7612 dated 8 -24 -98 thru 8 -28 -98 180,517.66 Checks #39505 thru #39619 dated 9 -1 -98 314.95 Checks #7613 thru #7614 dated 9 -01 -98 thru 9 -3 -98 528,695.25 Checks #39623 thru #39752 dated 9 -8 -98 $ 958 888.36 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: $ 300,920.24 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits Dated 8 -21 -98 48,833.30 Payroll Deduction checks #67252 thru #67265 dated 8 -21 -98 287 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits Dated 9 -4 -98 49,159.27 Payroll Deduction Checks #67455 thru #67469 date 9 -4 -98 $ 686,290.01 Total Payroll $1 GRAND TOTAL 2. Temporary Gambling Hill Murray High School (2623 Larpenteur Avenue East) Approved a temporary gambling license for an event to be held on October 9, 1998. 3. Saint Jerome Fall Festival - Temporary Food and Liquor Permits Approved a temE orary strong beer and wine license to be used on September 20, 1998. Proceeds will used to supplement the parish and school funds. 4. Ramsey County Sheriff's Department - Special Use Permit at Ramsey County Fair Grounds - Fright Night Approved a special use permit to hold a haunted house at the Ramsey County Fairgrounds on October 22 through the 24th and the 29th through the 31st. 5. Police Department Structure Change Established a non -union classification of Police Lieutenant with a salary range of $54,000 - $63,363. Revised the salary range for the position of Police 52 Captain from - - p ,292 $69,815 to $57,500 $69,815. Abolished one Police Sergeant position and one Police Captain position effective on the hiring date of the two Lieutenants. 9 -15 -98 2 6. Employee Insurance Renewal Approved a one -year contract for health insurance coverage with Medica and Health Partners, approved a one -year contract for life insurance coverage with Minnesota Mutual, and a one -year contract for dental plan administrative services with DCA including the Premier Network preferred provider services. 7. Municipal State Aid Advancement Request Approved the following resolution requesting an advance of state aid funds: RESOLUTION REQUESTING ADVANCE OF STATE AID FUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has implemented Municipal State Aid Street Projects in 1998 which will require state aid funds in excess of those available in its state aid construction account, and WHEREAS, said City is prepared to proceed with the construction of said projects through the use of advance encumbrances from the general state aid construction account to supplement the available funds in their state aid construction account and WHEREAS, repayment of the funds so advanced will be made in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 162.14, Subdivision 6 Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8820. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the commission of transportation be and hereby requested to approve this advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid Street Projects of the City of Maplewood in an amount up to $635,000 in accordance with Minnesota Rules 8820.1500, Subparagraph 9, and to authorize repayments from the following year's accruals to the construction account of the Municipal State Aid Street fund for said City.- 8. Personal Service Business Premise License - Tracie Jo Peck for Shear Emphasis, Inc. (3000 White Bear Avenue) Approved a personal service business premise license for Tracie Jo Peck, Shear Emphasis, Inc. (3000 White Bear Avenue) 9. Personal Service License - Dawn Bennett to be used at Shear Emphasis, Inc. Approved a personal service license for Dawn Bennett 10. Contingency Request - Fire Department Apparatus Identification Approved $5,150 from the contingency fund to be transferred to the Fire Department for fire apparatus identification. 11. Donation Acceptance - "Middle School After School Youth Fund" Accepted a donation in the amount of $270 on behalf of the "Middle School After School Youth Fund ". 9 -15 -98 3 NONE a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. 1 L •li• .� • . 1 • •11� - • -� - 11 - / �- •1 it _� -� Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 1. Driveway variance - 1470 Price Avenue a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. b. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following persons were heard: Thomas Schaefer, 1470 Price Avenue Robert and Julie Lumpkins, 1707 Barclay Street N. C ouncilmember Koppen moved to ! -1 the reQuest for the driveway - b. variance Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Councilmembers Kittridge, Koppen Nays - Mayor Rossbach Councilmembers Carlson, Allenspach Vote failed. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Mayor Rossbach Councilmembers Allenspach, Carlson Nays - Councilmembers Kittridge, Koppen Mayor Rossbach moved back to Presentations to mention the death of six children and expressed thanks to those individuals who assisted with the funeral. 2. No Parking English Street a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. 9 -15 -98 4 b. Ken Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following person was heard: David Bartol, 1249 Frisbie Councilmember Koppen moved to establish a no Darking zone on both sides of English Street from RiDley Avenue to Frost Avenue except for the area between the two driveways at 1840 nn 1 QA 7 Cnn1 i ch C +hn i.tni it to hn n nc +nfA nr, 7 . nn r, m 4-r, 7 . nn rn Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - a 11 3. Keller /Arcade Intersection Design a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Ken Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following persons were heard: Bill Hanson, 2836 Keller Parkway John Gores, 2870 Arcade Councilmember Carlson moved to a Drove the revised intersection desi at Keller/Arcade with a center isla d and directed staff to oay for the additional cost with MaDlewood state aid funds, Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Mayor Rossbach Councilmembers Allenspach, Carlson, Kittridge Nays - Councilmember Koppen 1. Construction Agreement a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Melinda Coleman presented the specifics of the report. c. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. d. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following person was heard: James Kaczamarczik, 211 Ferndale Avenue Councilmember Koppen i troduced the following Resolution and moved its adODtiO Kaczamaczik is to work with Public Works to construct the driveway and aut�= Haider • . • �. . 1 11 9 -15 -98 5 •; is • CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Jim Kaczmarczik is asking that the City Council approve a construction agreement to build a house on a lot that does not front on an improved public street. WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is: The SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 24, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, Section 9 -1(a) of the City Code requires all lots to abut on a publicly dedicated and maintained street to be built on. WHEREAS, this parcel does not front on a publicly- maintained street and as such, the proposed house would not front on a publicly dedicated and maintained street. WHEREAS, the history of this request is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this request on September 1, 1998. They recommended that the City Council approve the request. 2. The City Council discussed this request on September 14, 1998. The Council gave everyone at the meeting a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described agreement because: 1. The situation is unusual. 2. The property owner did not cause the existing conditions. 3. Having one additional house in the area would not alter the neighborhood's character. 4. The City has approved other homes on private driveways. This resolution requires that the property owner complete the following conditions before the City issues a building permit: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan the City dated August 14, 1998. The a plicant shall change the driveway and turnaround locations to lessen the grading and s ope disturbance. The City Engineer shall approve the driveway and turnaround location and designs. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes to the plans. 2. Record the following with Ramsey County: a. An agreement that allows the property owner or users of this property to use the existing private road easement for ingress and egress from the parcel to Henry Lane. b. An agreement against the property that: (1) Holds the City harmless from any liability for using the private driveway or any delay in emergency vehicles finding the structure(s). (2) States that the property owners shall maintain, plow and sand this driveway to 9 -15 -98 6 the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. City staff shall review these agreements. The property owner shall provide the City with copies of all recorded documents. 3. Install a sign at the end of Henry Lane and the driveway that states the addresses of the houses using the private driveway. Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes -all 2. Maplewood Drop -off Recycling Center 1902 County Road B a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. Councilmember Carlson moved,to close the recycling center on November 1. 1998__and ace with a suin cleanuD dav starting-in 1999, Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 3. Revisions to Site Plan - Plaza 3000 (3000 White Bear Avenue) a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Melinda Coleman presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following persons were heard: Richard Schreier, Azure Properties, 2125 DeSota Monica Mogren, Architect for Plaza 3000 Councilmember Carlson moved to table until a future meetinQ for--the r)urr)ose of aa additional inf• Il : • n Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - All 4. Storm Water Project Petition - Roselawn /Desota a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report. b. Ken Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. Councilmember Carlson authorized abudc of $10 to pursue a storm .: er managemen 9 -15 -98 7 Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 5. Bruentrup Farm Status a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. b. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following person was heard: Bruce Mogren, 1016 Stillwater Avenue Councilmember Rossbach moved to table until a future meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 6. Street Name Change Donna Senty Drive a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. b. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. Councilmember Carl• moved to . pD • - a D • 1 from residents on 1.11. Sentv Drive reouestin the name of the Drive' be chang6d back to the ori name of Ide Street, Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - al l 7. White Bear Lake Emergency vehicle Pre- emption Project a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. Councilmember Carlson authorized staff to Day for the- Citv's share of the White Bear Lake EVP system with state aid street construct'io account funds , Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - all NONE 9 -15 -98 8 1. Committee Reports- Mayor's Mailbox - Mayor Rossbach reminded Maplewood citizens to vote in the primary election on September 15, 1998. 2. RCLG Meeting on 9/24 at Shoreview Community Center - Don Shelby moderator I Mid Summer's Night - Councilmember Allenspach congratulated the Parks and Recreation Staff for doing a good job on organizing all of the Mid Summer's Night events. 1. S ecial Meeting, Wednesday, September 16, 1998 for the purpose of canvassing the e ection results at 4:45 in the Maplewood Room. Motion by Allenspach, second by Kittridge, Ayes - all. Councilmember Rossbach moved to adjourn at 9:20 P.M. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach. Ayes - All Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk 9 -15 -98 9 JF AGENDA ITEM V ,Action by Council: TO: City Manager Endorsed Modified ,...... FROM: City Engineer Rej ected.,,. ]Dat SUBJECT: Change Order 1—English Street I • g Improvement, City Project 96 -19 DATE: September 18, 1998 Because street construction is a major inconvenience � • 1 ence to the residents who live along construction schedule a project and because a long hedule increases project inspection costs the project construction contract was written with a $5,000 incentive clause for earl completion. The contractor, Forest Lake y Contracting, Inc., has met all the req uirements for early completion. q is Staff is very pleased with the efforts of Forest La ' Lake Contracting, Inc., who worked very completed the project diligently at the project and com p p oject in two months and almost a month ahead of schedule. The incentive is approximately ° • pp y 1.3 /o of the construction contract and is eligible for state aid funding. g Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution approving Change Order 1 for early completion incentives on the English Street Improvement project in the amount of $5,000. AGENDA REPORT CIVIC REVISED CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Original Contract: +Change Order No. 1: Revised Contract: +Ramsey Co. Force Account: + City Force Account: Subtotal: +Admin, Eng, Legal, Fiscal (31.5 %): $367,752.00 $5,000.00 $372 $3,591.21 $484.93 $376,866.21 $118 REVISED FINANCING: Revised Total Project Cost: $495,541.00 Sewer fund: $2,187.00 Assessments: $220,050.00 State Aid Funds: $273,342.07 Total Financing: $495,579.07 ENGLISH STREET, LARPENTEUR AVENUE TO FROST AVENUE PROJECT 96 -19 PROJECT PAYMENT REQUEST ESTIMATE NO. 3 PERIOD ENDING: September 14 19 p 98 CONTRACTOR: FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING, INC. CONTRACT AMOUNT: $367,752 ITEM DESCRIPTION 2021.501 Mobilization (5% maximum) 2104.501 Remove CMP or RCP storm sewer pipe 2104.501 Remove concrete curb and gutter 2104.505 Remove concrete driveway pavement 2104.505 Remove concrete walk 2104.505 Remove bituminous driveway pavement 2104.505 Remove bituminous pavement 2104.509 Remove drainage structure 2104.509 Remove miscellaneous structure 2104.511 Sawing concrete pavement 2104.513 Sawing bituminous pavement 2105.501 Common excavation (P) 2105.525 Topsoil borrow, LV 2123.610 Street sweeper (with pickup broom) 2130.501 Water 2211.501 Aggregate base Class 5, 100% crushed (driveways) 2211.501 Aggregate base, Class 6 2232.501 Mill bituminous surface, (40 mm) 2331.603 Bituminous joint sawing 2340.508 Type 41A Wearing course mixture (41WEA50055) 2340.514 Type 32B base course mixture (32BBB50000) 2340.518 Type 41A wearing course mixture for driveway 2357.502 Bituminous material for tack coat 2503.511 300 mm (12 ") RC pipe sewer Des. 3006, CL V 2503.511 375 mm (15 ") RC pipe sewer Des. 3006, CL V 2503.511 450 mm (18 ") RC pipe sewer Des. 3006, CL III 2503.511 525 mm (21") RC pipe sewer Des. 3006, CL III 2503.603 150 mm (6 ") PVC, SDR 35 san.sewer SVC replacement 2503.603 150 mm (6 ") PVC, SDR 35 san.sewer SVC riser replacement 2503.603 Sanitary sewer inspection, televising 2504.602 Adjust valve box, water 2504.602 Adjust curb stop box 2504.602 Repair valve box, water 2504.602 Repair curb step box 2504.602 F & I curb box single lid cover 2504.604 50 mm (2 ") polystyrene insulation 2505.602 Adjust valve box, gas 2506.502 Construct drainage structure Design Box CB W /R- 3067 -V 2506.502 Construct drainage structure Design 1200 mm (48 ") CB W /R- 3067 -V EST. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT QTY. TO DATE PRICE TOTAL LS 1.00 39.00 6.00 180.00 8.00 560.00 760.00 6.00 1.00 50.00 152.00 3960.00 555.00 26.00 100.00 60.00 5150.00 34.00 640.00 1000.00 1500.00 120.00 2430.00 100.00 42.00 112.00 506.00 20.00 1.00 52.00 28.50 142.00 10.40 1033.10 1590.00 6.00 1.00 10.50 238.70 4197.00 556.40 17.00 478.10 24.53 5308.44 35.50 914.40 1017.02 1419.24 161.14 2082.00 94.60 42.50 113.50 520.10 25.80 $12,000.00 $25.00 $10.00 $5.00 $5.00 $2.00 $3.00 $300.00 $300.00 $24.00 $8.00 $9.00 $13.00 $80.00 $4.00 $15.00 $8.00 $7.00 $5.00 $26.00 $24.00 $62.00 $0.30 $75.00 $70.00 $75.00 $80.00 $80.00 $12,000.00 $1,300.00 $285.00 $710.00 $52.00 $2,066.20 $4,770.00 $1,800.00 $300.00 $252.00 $1,909.60 $37,773.00 $7,233.20 $1,360.00 $1,912.40 $367.95 $42,467.52 $248.50 $4,572.00 $26,442.52 $34,061.76 $9,990.68 $624.60 $7,095.00 $2,975.00 $8,512.50 $41,608.00 $2,064.00 m m2 m2 m2 m2 EA EA m M m3 m3 HR m3 t t m2 m t t t L m M M m m m m EA EA EA EA EA m2 EA EA EA 16.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 799.00 799.00 $2.00 $1,598.00 12.00 4.00 $130.00 $520.00 31.00 11.00 $40.00 $440.00 5.00 12.00 $500.00 $6,000.00 15.00 14.00 $140.00 $1,960.00 4.00 4.00 $100.00 $400.00 110.00 120.90 $20.00 $2,418.00 2.00 0.00 $90.00 $0.00 11.00 11.00 $1,000.00 $11,000.00 9.00 9.00 $1 $12,600.00 English Street, Larpenteur Avenue to Frost Avenue Project 96 -19 2506.502 Construct drainage structure Design 1200 mm (48 ") TOTAL Original contract amount Revised contract amount (change order no. 1) Total earned to date Less 5% retainage Plus Incentives (change order no. 1) Less liquidated. damages Subtotal Less previous payments Amount due Contractoi Engineer: 3.00 (48 MH W /R- 1422 -0004 & 2422 -009 lid EA 2506.522 Adjust frame and ring casting EA 2521.501 100 mm (4 ") concrete walk m2 2531.501 Concrete curb and gutter, Design B618 m 2531.602 Concrete approach nose . EA 2531.507 150 mm (6 ") concrete driveway pavement, residential m2 2531.507 200 mm (8 ") concrete driveway pavement, commercial m2 2540.602 Reinstall salvaged mailbox support EA 2540.602 Furnish & install mailbox support EA 2563.601 Traffic control LS 2564.602 Pavement message (right arrow) poly preformed EA 2564.602 Pavement message (left arrow) poly preformed EA 2564.602 Pavement message (ONLY) poly preformed EA 2564.602 Sign post support EA 2573.602 Rock entrance pad EA 2573.502 Silt fence, type preassembled maintained m 2573.505 Flotation silt curtain, type still water m 2575.505 Sodding type lawn m2 2575.513 Mulch material, Type 6 m3 2575.532 Commercial fertilizer Analysis 10 -10 -10 kg 2575.601 Erosion control, contractor's plan (1 % min.) LS TOTAL Original contract amount Revised contract amount (change order no. 1) Total earned to date Less 5% retainage Plus Incentives (change order no. 1) Less liquidated. damages Subtotal Less previous payments Amount due Contractoi Engineer: 3.00 4.00 $1,400.00 $5,600.00 9.00 8.00 $180.00 $1,440.00 20.00 34.00 $30.00 $1,020.00 1800.00 1781.00 $22.00 $39 6.00 8.00 $21.00 $168.00 130.00 151.60 $36.00 $5 50.00 25.10 $46.00 $1 20.00 12.00 $50.00 $600.00 12.00 23.00 $80.00 $1,840.00 1.00 1.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 1.00 0.00 $600.00 $0.00 1.00 0.00 $600.00 $0.00 1.00 0.00 $950.00 $0.00 ' 6.00 4.00 $20.00 $80.00 5.00 1.00 $500.00 $500.00 30.00 4.30 $10.00 $43.00 100.00 60.00 $50.00 $3,000.00 4000.00 5155.00 $2.50 $12,887.50 75.00 110.00 $21.00 $2,310.00 90.00 136.20 $1.00 $136.20 1.00 0.75 $3,700.00 $2,775.00 $377,883.33 $367 $372 $377 $19,144.17 $5,000.00 $363 $352,381.91 $11 Date: Date: 7--I9' CHANGE ORDER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Contractor: Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. The following changes shall be made in the contract documents: Incentive clause for early completion (1.3 %) Project Name: English Street Improvements Change Order No.: 1 Project No.: 96 -19 Date: September 14, 1998 Original Contract: Change This Change Order: Revised Contract: Approved Approved $5,000.00 $367,752.00 5 $372,752.00 a r EhIn e r A Agreed to by Contractor by Its Title RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has, heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 96 -19, English Street Improvements, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 96 -19, Change Order 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 1 in the amount of $5,00.0. The revised contract amount is $372,752. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. The project budget is increased by $5,000. AGENDA NO. G"2 AGENDA REPORT Action by Council:. TO: City Council Endorsed FROM: Finance Director Modified Rejected RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS :ate DATE: September 21, 1998 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $89,763.42 Checks #7615 thru #7623 dated 9/4/98 thru 9/9/98 $202,077.42 Checks #39756 thru #39862 dated 9/15/98 $23,197.56 Checks #7624 thru #7631 dated 9/11/98 thru 9/18/98 $175,909.34 Checks #39866 thru #39960 dated 9/22/98 $490,947.74 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: $284,009.67 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 9/18/98 $47,762.35 Payroll Deduction check #67646 thru #67659 dated 9/18/98 $331,772.02 Total Payroll $822,719.76 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. hu Attachments C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN\AGENDA\APPRCL21.SEP VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 09/11/98 17:26 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ _ CHECK CHECK VENDOR _ ..- VENDOR _ _ ._ _ _ -_ ITEM - . -- - _ ._ ...._ -. -- _LTEM - - - - __ CHECK - NUMBER i DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 76.15 09/04/98 _4 _DEPT. OF- NATURAL RESOURSES DNR - LICENSE FEES _PAYABLE _ _ -- _283,.04._.- . -__ -_ 7616 09/04/98 530100 MEDICA CHOICE HCMA DEDUCTION PAY 3,837.66 . _- - - - -- - - - - -- - -- ------ - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- _ _ _ - -- -.._.- _HEALTH - LIFE - DENTAL INS, - - - - -- - -- 2 0, 180 ..34_.` - -- - - - -- - -_ _ .� A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 3 27,837.50 7617 09/04/98 _ -_ 551100 _ MN MUTUAL LIFE _ _ -_ HCMA DEDUCTION PAY _ _ _ _ 297..517____ -_ -__ . LIFE INSURANCE PAYABLE 928.84 HEALTH- LIFE- -DENTAL INS. 848.01 _A / I NSURANCE ._ CONTINUANCE _ ' 13 __ 2, 213.86 _ 7618 09/04/98 180100 D.C.A.,INC. SEPT ADM FEE 608.00 608.00 7619 09/04/98 280200 FORTIS.BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. L.T.D. INSURANCE 1 1 _76 09 /08/98 _ 330680 H EALTHPARTNERS - _ _ HCMA DEDUCT LON PAY_ Q,@4 - - HEALTH -LIFE- DENTAL INS. 15,925.16 A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 2 22,007.85 7621. 09/08/98 341706 HERITAGE BANK US SAVINGS BONDS 500.00 500.00 _ 7622 _ 09/ 09/98 722 200 _ P . E . R . A ._ _ _ _ PERA DED PAY- KOPPEN _ 1 6.29 PERA CONTRIB- K'OPPEN 16.29 32.58 7623 09/09/98 722200 P.E.R.A. PERA DEDUCTION PAYABLE - _- -__ _15 037.95 PERA CONTRIBUTIONS 19,321.26 34 39756 09/15/9 H PAR R -DUP PMT 98006746 63 639.15 39757 09/15/98 ANGELA FIRKELL REFUND PATIENT PD F16575 100.00 100.00 39758 09/15/98 MEDICA CHOICE REFUNDS REFUND OVERPD. F19423 128.70 REFUND OVERPD. F19391 365.95 494.65 39759 09/15/98 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION REFUND - OVERCHARGED 3RD FLSE AL 50.00 50.00 39760 09/15/98 GENE LESLIE REFUND OF OVERCHG. FOR ACM 36.00 36.00 39761 09/15/98 'JAYNE TARR REFUND FALL SOCCER 35.00 35.00 39762 09/15/98 JEANELLE GRAY REFUND FALL SOCCER 40.00 40.00 39763 09/15/98 MICHELLE KING REFUND FALL SOCCER 40.00 40.00 39764 09/15/98 SHERI WOHLERS REFUND FALL SOCCER 35.00 35.00 39765 09/1.5/98 JANICE RUBBERT REFUND FALL SOCCER 40.00 40.00 39766 09/15/98 TONY KABLAN REFUND FALL SOCCER 25.00 25.00 39767 09/15/98 COURTNEY CADWELL SWIM REFUND 38.00 38.00 P4)b VOUCHRE2 09/11/98 17:26 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER PAGE 2 FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER i CHECK _ DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM - __ . DESCRIPTION LTEM -- - - -- - - - -- AMOUNT CHECK -- -- - -- - -- _...__, AMOUNT 39768 09/15/98 - -- __ -LYNN GERLACH _ REFUND KARATE - _. 39769 09/15/98 CASSANDRA SIMON REFUND SWIM MEET 5.00 5.00 39770 1)9/15/98 LISA SCHROEDER SWIM REFUND 4.00 4.00 39771 i _ 09/ 15 /98 . - -- - - - - - _BA KABLAOU I_. - _ . _ -- - - SWIM _ -_.. _ -- - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - 4 , 00 - -- -- _ _ 4. 00 _ 39772 09/15/98 JOANNE DANSDILL REFUND PRO -RATED ANN. 14.56 14.56 39773 09/15/98 RICHARD BUTLER REFUND PRO -RATED MEMB. 35.48 35.48 39 - . -_ 010469_ -- _ATX.- TECHNOLOGIES, INC. _ __ -.. _ __. _CELL. PHONE ATX_ COMPATIBLE I FILE . -. - -------- _ -_ _ _ _ _.__. 97 8.47 _- _57E3 e -4-7 39775 09/15/98 020150 AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE ACCT.1.187309 58.57 58.57 39776 09/15/98 020645 ALLIED BLACKTOP CO. RAMSEY CTY. PORTION PROJ.98 -02 5,900.00 5 39777 09/15/98 030660 _ ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES ANIMAL CONTROL 8/31-9/7/98 a29 9.05 39778 09/15/98 030730 ANOKA HENNEPIN TECH COLLEGE CAR FIRE SIMULATOR 600.00 600.00 39779 09/15/98 031100 APPEARANCE PLUS CAR __ ASH CAR WASHES - AUGUST - 103.82 103.82 39780 - 09/15/98 _ _ 041005 A RDEN - _SHOREV I EW- ANIMAL _HOSP - K -9 MEDICATION _ 20.20 20.20 39781 09/15/98 041500 ASPEN MILLS PANTS 84.48 84.08 39782 09/15/98 061906 BAUER BUILT TIRES 73.76 --- 73.7f, 3978 3 U9/ 15/_98_ _ t�7108u _ BEKGGFcEN s GORDON _ _ NAME SIGNS-COUNCIL CHAMBERS 105.00 105. _ 39784 09/15/98 110150 C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES CREDIT REPORT SERVICES 25.00 25.00 39785 09/15/98 110325 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS SPRING BELT CLIP 38.34 PURCH. RADIUS GP300 PORT.RADIO 639.00 677.34 39786 09/15/98 190075 DEAN JOHNSON CONST -- 882 STERLING ST. S 882 STERLING ST. S 1,000.00 51.51 1,051.51 39787 09/15/98 200500 ---- ' -- D I AM VOGEL PAINTS TRAFFIC PAINT, GLASS BEADS 339.63 339.63 39788 09/15/98 250450 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO., INC. MANHOLE RINGS _ 200.22 " - MANHOLE RINGS 222.05 _ _ - -- 422.27 39789 09/15/98 260255 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY BRAKE ROTOR 12 0.00- CREDIT 95.37 39790 09/15/98 260290 FARMER BROS. CO. COFFEE 72.00 72.00 39791 09/15/98 300500 G & K SERVICES CREDIT FOR UNIFORMS 264.00- VOUCHRE2 09/11/98 17:26 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER PAGE 3 i FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ r- -- -- CHECK _ CHECK - VENDOR VENDOR_ NUMBER DATE NUMBER -- - -- - NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION - - ITEM -_ -- -- - -- CHECK _ - -- AMOUNT AMOUNT _ - MATS 41.27 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING - -- -- : -- - - - -- - - - - -- -- - _- -- MATS 12.00 - .- _.._...._ -- - - -- -- SUPPLIES__ - JANITORIA_L_ - - -- - --- - UNIFORMS & CLOTHING- - - - -- -- - -- - SUPPLIES- JANITORIAL 11.20 - - - - - _ & CLOTHING 10.30 MATS SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL - 12.00 15.19 -- - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- - -- -- -- -- - - - -- - -- UNIFORMS & CLOTHING MATS SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 49.60 14.91 ---- - - -._- __ -- --- -__ -.- - -- -- -- - -- UNIFORMS & CLOTHING UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 88.01 - - - _ _ _ -- - -- UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 38.71 - - - - -- - - - - - - - -` UN & CLOTHING - - -- _ - -- 25 39792 09/15/98 310710 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, - - - - -- -.- - - - -- INC. AUG. 98 SERVICE -- - - - - -- _ 1 39793 09/15/98 32029 '5 LARSON SPORTS BODY 119.00 - 119.00 BALL, GYMNIC- PHYSIO BALL 207.23 207.23- 397 09 /15/ 98 341800 HEWITT, JOEL -- - - _ LODGING- INCIDENT MGMT. 39795 09/15/98 350700 HIRSHFIELDS - MEALS - - - -- - - - - - - - -.._ . - -- - 974.31 _ 9 - - _ BRUSH CLEANER, PAINT BRUSHES 31.62 31 62 39796 09/15/98 350940 _ _ HOME DEPOT /GECF SMALL TOOLS _ - - - -- - - -_ - -.. ._ . - - -- -- - - - -- - - _ . -- DUCT TAPE, BATTERIES, WD 40 40.54 - -- - - - - - -- -- - -- - - -- - - -_ _ - -- - -- - - - ___ _ __ STATION SUP PL I ES- JANITORIAL - - 156.61 -- _ ..._ __ SUPPLIES - J AN I TOR I AL . - -- - - - .- - - - - - -- 63.43 - - -- -- - -- - - - -. -. 39797 - 09/15/98 350950 HOOVER COMPANY _ ... .. STEAM VAC BRUS BRUSHES .708.95 39798 09/15/98 370075 HUGO'S TREE CARE 48.56 _ 48.56 - - -- - TREE & STUMP REMOVAL 1, 648.49 48 1 .49 39799 09/15 /98 3 __ __ 70076 ' _ . _ _ HUGHE_ S & COSTELLO - -- SEPT. RETAINER FEE - -- - AUG. LEGAL SERVICES 5,000.00 627.25 39800 09/15/98 380120 I.A.E.M. 5,627.25 ANN. MEMB. DUES -L. CUDE 100.00 -- 100.00.. 39801 09/15/98 380150 IBCO - - - -- -- - - CODEXPRESS CD-ROM 245.00 UFC VOLUMES 1&2 _ _ - -- - . 108.90 353.90 39802 09/15/98 380200 ICMA REG. FEE ICMA GONF. 521.00 521.00 39803 09/15/98 380469 I.P.M.A. MINNESOTA LUNCHEON MTG. S. LE - 39804 09/15/98 380820 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS COPIER LEASE 15.00 - - - - -- -- 15.00 80' /. 266.94 - - - - -- - - - - -- COPIER LEASE 20% 66.74 333.68 39805 09/15/98 400650 J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC. APPLIANCES RECYCLED _ APPLIANCES RECYCLED 29.00 141.00 Elm� VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 09/11/98 17:26 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER PAGE 4 _.. FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ _ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER _. _ NAME - - _ DESCR -- - -- - -- -- -- IPTION ITEM I AMOUNT AMOUNT APPLIANCES RECYCLED APPLIANCES RECYCLED 122.00 - - - -- - - -- -- - - - APPLIANCES RECYCLED 98.00 - _ _.. - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - -- ----- ___..... -- - -- - IANCES RECYCLED .- -. - - -325.00 -- - _ - - -- _ - APPLIANCES RECYCLED -- - - 127.00 - - - - -- -- - -- - - - APPLIANCES RECYCLED 99.00 997.00 39806 69/15/98 410260 KAMCOM TECHNOLOGIES - - -- - - - - NOBILIS PC`S -PII 300MHZ - -- - _. _ . -- -- -- - - - -- .._ -- 4 4.,377.58 39807 09/15/98 410370 KATH COMPANIES P ADS 105 59 105. 59 k 39808 09/15/98 430300 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. BAGS,COOKIES,BATTERIES,GRAPES 17.52 17.52 39809 09/15/98 450480 LANDMARK CUSTOM HOMES 1460 MARY ST. N - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - -- 1460 MARY ST. N 1, 000.00 5.07 1,005.07 39810 09/15/98 460452 LEAGUE OF MINN. CITIES FLSA BASICS REG- MA - - 20.04 - -- - - -- AWAIR WORKSHOP-M. ERICSON 10.00 30.00 39811 09/15/98 460800 LESCO INC. a FERTILIZER 121.41 121.41 39812 09/ 15/98 480565 LOMBARD I� REIMBURSEMENT 205 MI. _JIM 57.40 -... -- -- -- 57.40 39813 09/15/98 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY SWEETS, BUNS 309.06 _ -._._ _ - - - -_- - -- ------ - - - - -- ..._ . - -- -- -.. _ . BIRTHDAY CAKES .- - - - -- - - - - - -- -__ 1_.75 23 BIRTHDAY CAKES - _ _ 41.25 474.06 39814 _ - 09/15/98 - - - -- - - - - - -- �. 510550 - - -- -- - - -- MAPLEWOOD DEVELOPMENT _ - - - -- -- - -_ -- - 2646 BARCLAY ST. N 1, 0 00.00 2646 BARCLAY ST. N - 48.36 1,048.36 39815 09/15/98 520570 MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY CO. STEEL CAN TOTE BAG NUMBERS - - - _ . 102.98 - . - -- - - - -- - - -- -- - - 102.98 39816 019/15/98 530730 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY BASKETBALL RIMS - - - - -- - - -- - - 749.01 749.01 39817 09/15/98 540170 MIDWEST CHILDREN'S RESOURCE CT COPY -VIDEO TAPE 98013431 - - -. - - - - - -- - - - 20 2U . 00 . 00 39818 09/15/98 570090 MOGREN BROS. SOD_ STAPLES BLACK DIRT 149.10 39819 09/15/98 570114 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE RATING FEE 25,650.00 _149.10 - - -- - _.. _ -- - - - -- __ - - - - - - - -- - _ - -- _ - RATING FEE _ ._ 2� 650.00 - - - -- - -- - - -- - -- 5i 39820 09/15/98 610300 MULVANEY, DENNIS SAFETY TOE BOOTS 30.00 30„00 39821 - 09/15/98 630630 NAT'L ADVERTISERS ACCTG, INC. A ADVERTISING - - - - � 132.00 132.00 39822 09!15/98 - - 630665 NAT'L FIRE PROTECTION ASSN. MEMB. RENEWAL - J. HEWITT __. 115.00 115.00 39823 09/15/98 640830 NEXT CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES, INC SEAGATE 4.55GB BARRACUDA HD 1 CREDIT FOR Al BARRACUDE HD 744.17- 780.17 39824 09/15/98 660180 NORTH METRO AUTOMOTIVE RPR & MAINT. - DC #2 773.32 773.32 Elm� VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 09/11/98 17 :.26 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR - - VENDOR . - -- - - -- - - _ -- -- - -- -= ITEM I TEM - - - - - - -- -CHECK - � NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 39825 09/15/98 661181 NORTHERN AIRGAS MEDICAL OXYGEN 268.44 OXYGEN CYLINDER RENTAL 34.27 302.71 39826 661755 _ STATES_ POWER UTILITIES �__- 3.1 _ _ - _ _- _ - - - -- UTILITIES -- 3.14 -- -- UTILITIES 3.14 UTILITIES 163.34 UTILITIES 9.87 UTILITIES 178.58 UTILITIES 4.91 UTILITIES 17.08 UTILITIES 29.66 UTILITIES - -- - - - -- - - 1 - -- - - - - -- _ -- UTILITIES 369.58 UTILITIES 99.85 UTILITIE _ - -_ _ _ _ 10.55 _ 1. _ 39827 09/15/98 691150 ONE HOUR MOTO PHOTO FILM DEVELOPING 44.19 PICTROSTAT HALF SHEET 6.70 50.89 39828 09/15/98 691300 OPTICON INC. AWARDED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 110,834.97 CON TRACTS _PAY RETAINA 5 - 1 05 9 293 .23 39829 09/15/98 691800 OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS GATED WYE VALVE 404.60 404.60 39830 09/15/98 701300 PARR EMERGENCY PRODUCTS SALES SHARPS CONTAINER 12.55 12.55 _ 39831_ 09/15/9 _- 71 1670 P I ONE ER G RAPH I C S _I NC. _ - - POLI - CAR _ _-- -- 51 0.00 - 510.40_ 39832 09/15/98 720745 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC AMT. DUE INV 98517 10.00 10.00 39833 09/15/98 720755 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC. NATIVE GRASS & WILDFLOWER MAIN 124.31 124.31 39834_ 09/15 _ - 7 41200 - - R AINB OW _ FOO DS _ _ A - C I - DER, J U I CE . MUFF I N S- _ - 28.97 28.97 39835 09/15/98 750500 REGAL AUTO WASH #20M CAR WASHES AUG. 82.50 CAR WASHES AUG. _ 22.50 CAR WASHES AUG. 15.00 120.00 _ .. -- _ 39836 09/15/98 -. - 761200 - -- ROAD RESCUE INC. - _ 90 SERIES STROBE -- - -- - -- -- - - -- -- - _ - 215.75 _ __ -- - ._.... _ -- 215.75 398;7 09/15/98 762055 ROSEDALE DODGE- HYUNDAI SWITCH 13.85 SENSOR 43.03 56.88 39838 09/15/98 780300 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE 26.02 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 20.32 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 3.86 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 129.02 ° SUPPLIES - OFFICE 53.16 232.38 39839 09/15/98 780600 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT COFFEE SUP'P'LIES 258.95 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 09/11198 17:26 PAGE 6 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ - - - -- - - - -- CHECK. NUMBER CHECK _.._ DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM - DESCRIPTION ITEM _ _ AMOUNT _ _ - .CHECK . . AMOUNT CLIPBOARDS , SHARPENERS CHIPS, CRACKERS, CANDY 47.65. -- 54.60 _ 361.20 _ 39841 09/1 - _ _... _ 09/15/98 820206 - - _. 843754 SIGNART ._...... STRUCK & IRWIN PAVING, INC. RPR S I GNAGE- MCC SLAG SLURRY SEAL- HAZELWOOD PAR - - 7,927.50 - - - -- A 3 Ob3 , 7 5 ... 7927.50 9 39842 09/15/98 - 850395 -- SUNRAY B -T -b SUPPLIES - VEHICLE SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 113.40 -_ -- -- 3.97 - - - - - -- - -- _ - - --- 117.37 39843 09/15/98 850660 SUPERINTENDENT OF DO, C SUBSCRIPTION TO FDA CONSUMER 18.00 - _._._ ._ -18.00 39844 - _ _ 39845 _.. 09/15/98 __._. -. _- _ - - -- - - - -- - -- - 09/15/98 860080 - ---- - - - - -- 860305 T.A. SCHIFSKY &SONS INC - - - - - - -- - -- -- -- ... _ - -- - -- - - - T.J.T. - SHIRTS SAND ASPHALT -P &R PARKING LOT ASPHALT- OVERLAY PROGRAM -- BITUMINOUS MATERIALS -- - - - -- - - - -- - - S,M,L BIRTHDAY SHIRTS 227.06 2,957.43 19217.70 -- - -- 2 . 175 - 15 485.00 6 577 485.00 39846 09/15/98 860650 TARGET STORES -CSA A/R FILM - 23.87 23.87 39847 - -- - - - - - -- 09/15/98 - -- - - - - - - -- 860690 - --- -- TAUBMAN DOUGLAS J. -- - -- --- - z -- -.. BREAKFAST -MRPA LEGISLATIVE _ COM .. -- --- - - - - -- - -15.00 39848 09/15/98 861618 THE ENGRAVING SHOP PLAQUE FOR PUPPET WAGON 20.00 - 20.00 39849 39850 _ 09/15/98 09/15/98 i 880800 880820 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG. TRUGREEN __CHEMLAWN REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE CONTRACTOR BODY WEED CONTROL- HAZELWOOD PARK 504.48 18 - 506.58 18,606.29 - 506.58 39851 09/15/98 881275 TWIN CITIES SERVICE CENTER REPAIR & MAINT /RADIO 1 626.0G .. 1 - - - - - 12626.00 39852 09/15/98 890600 U.H.L. CO. INC. TRAINING CLASS SIGNAL OPERATOR 350.00 T 350.00 39853 _ 09/15/98 901300 UPPER MIDWEST SALES CO. - ' --- ' JANITORIAL SUPPLIES UPF•L I ES -- . -__ -- _ -- 3-1- - 187. 187.31 39854 09/15/98 910450 VALLEY TROPHY - PLAQUE -DARE - - 36.85 39855 09/15/98 911350 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY CABLE TIE 131.09 131.09 39856 09/15/98 911600 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER PVC BOOTIES 30.00 - . 30.00 39857 - 09/15/98 931298 WALLY MCCARTHY'S OLDS-AURORA-6 DIFFERENTIAL 473.66 4.73.6_6_ 39858 09/15/98 940500 WEBER - TROSETH INC. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS W /WH 73.47 73.47 39859 09/15/98 943608 WOODBURY. CITY OF KIDS AT CARVER BEACH 33.00 33.00 39860 09/15/98 960450 XEROX CORPORATION DUPLICATING COSTS DUPLICATING COSTS DUPLICATING COSTS 11.19 1.76 124.17 NI VOUCHRE2 49/11/98 17:26 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 7 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER i FOR_PFRIOD 49 VOUCHER/ -CHECK -- -- CHECK . VENDOR -- _ _.._VENDOR - - ' NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME _ _ -. -ITEM -ITEM - - - -- _ - -- - - - - - - -- ITEM - - - CHECK _ AMOUNT AMOUNT - -- _ - - - ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - .. DUPL I CAT I NG COSTS .. - - - -- - -- -- 33. DUPLICATING COSTS -- 48.74 219.39 39861 - 49/1 _ 970700 _YOCUM - O - - -- - - -- ---- - - - - -- - FUEL . - - -- - UNLEADED GASOLINE ___ 10._47. -- 49194.80 _ - 49205.27 39862 09/15/98 970790 - _.-- YORK__INTERNATIONAL CORP. RPR /C__.SYSTEM -MCC _ .A -- - -- -- - - -- -- - -- - - __ 291. 840.84 0 VOUCHRE::2 CITY OF MAPLE.WOOD 09/18/98 14:43 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER ' FOR PERIOD 09 CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUllf(ER DATE NOMBER NAME DESCRIPTION - - - - - - -- - A_MQUNT - _ .. - - -- --- AMOUNT- ` 7624 09/11/98 190400 DEFT. OF NATURAL RESOURfiES DNR LICENSE. FEES PAYABLE «9.00 229.00 7625 09/11/98 890905 U.S. WEST COMMU14ICATIONS TELEPHONE 55.59 TELEPHONE:: 57.80 -- - =- - - - - - - - TELEPHONE - - - - - _ - -- - .. I iZ9_..8.' - - - -- - -- - - - TELEPHONE 379.25 TELEPHONE 63.09 - - F-PHONE ,mo TELEPHONE 31.55 TELEPHONE 59.33 TELEPHONE -- - . _ .. - -- - - - 57, 62 - - - - TELEPHONE 1, 605.66 TELEPHONE 562.42 __ ... - - - - -- - --------------- -•-- -- --- - - - - -- - -- - TELEPHONE: _57 TELEPHONE 419. TELEPHONE 122.32 - -- - - - -- - -- - -- - - - - TELEPHONE 61.33 TELEPHONE'. 61.35 TELEPHONE 61.35 - - - - -- -- TELEPHONE' .. -- - - - -- -- - - - -- - -- - -- -- ... . - - - - -- 6 TELEPHONE 61.35 -.- - - - -- ' TELEPHONE 61.35 -- - - - TELEPHONE 61. 3 5 TELEPHONE 61.35 TELEPHONE 61.35 - - - - -- -- -- - -- - - -- - - - - - .- _.. -_ _ _ TELEPHONE -- -- - - 6 1.. 3. TELEPHONE 61.35 TELEPHONE 61. 35 TELEPHONE - - 61. 35 .5 - TELEPHONE 61. - - - TELEPHONE 61.35 - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- Th:L.E.PHONE: - - - - - - -- - -- -- 131.44 - -- TELEPHONE 59 .3 3 - - - - _ ' TELEPHONE 57.62 TE:LEPHONE=. 35.40 TEKLEPHONE 36. - - TELEPHONE 59.33 TELEPHONE 5.13 TELEPHONE 7 5 . 58 TE::I. E:F'HCINE:: 296. 1 E3 TE:L!_F*HUIqI." 50.20 '- TELEPHONE 58.20 TELEPHONE 5('3.20 _ TEILE:P HONE:: - 74.29 - TE:LEPHONIE. - - 7.62 57.62 - -- - TEL_E: PH(:i1lE :: 106.01 T'E:1._Ei 'FiOI al:= ]. ]. 7. 8 6 TELE PHONE 119.83 TE: :LEF'H(3111- 169.75 T'ELE:PHCINE� 93.54 7 0 V(JU(:''HF:EE2 CITY OF MAF'L..EW(JiJD PAGE 09/10/98 14:43 Vt1UCHE:F: /CFIEC:K REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ _ C:F- IE::GK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMDl';.'R DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUTA*r AMO�.JN'T' 7626 09/3.1/98 01046 A T'& T LONG DISTANCE TELFPHONE 12 5.88 PERSONAL LONG DISTANC_L-" 4. 50 _- 762 09/11/98 890900 U . S . WEST COMMUNICATIONS PAY PHONES _ PAY PHONES _ . _70..4 -- ... ._ 384.87 - 7628 09/1.6/98 210640 DRISCOLL. MARGARET REFUND -9/4 P/R DEDUCTION 6.00 6.00 7629 09/17/90 0103 A. M. E . M. FALL_ CONF REG- DOLLERSCHELL 100.00 100.00 7630 09/17/98 531660 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AUGUST SAC 15 AUGUST SAC RETAINER 150.00- 14,850.00 7631 09/18/98 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL F ESOURSES DNR LICENSE FEES • PAYADI._E_ 107,00 390366 09/22/903 GEOFFREY HILLESTAD REFUNI) OVERPMT. SECURITY OFFIC 60.00 60.00 39867 09/22/98 KENNETH THUNHORST REFUND TO PAT.-PD. F18773 173 173 »65 "4'9868 . 09 / _ 22 / 98 ___.__-__ _ -- _ WILLIAM-LEE REFUND TO F'AT . -F'D _- F'19708 71.66 _ - - -- - - ._ -- _ 71.. 6b ' 39869 09/22/98 REBECCA ILLINGWORTH REFUND- -CANCELLED ACH IN TUNE 60.00 60.00 :9870 09/22/98 MARY OLSON REFUND ME MBEF:5H1F' 23.00 23.00 t 39(371 09/2. /�i?( _ _ - _ - - CONN I E __ DUFRCSNE . - REFUND VALLEY FAIR: _ - __- _ -- - - -64.00 _ 64 - ;9'8'Z2 09/22/ JEANNE GIERNET REFUND INDOOR: SOCCER 30.00 30.00 39073 09/22/98 ELIZABETH GOLDBERG REFUND FALL SOCCER - - 40.00 40.00 3987 0 -- - -- -- - - - - -- NANCY MISKE.L.L -- - - - OVERPMTS. ON MO. MEMBERSHIP - - - - -- - - - 10.00. - -- - - 10.00_ 39875 09/22/98 010475 AWD COOLERS COOLER EQUIP. RENTAL_ 319.02 319.02 39876 09/22/98 020400 AIR FILTERS UNLIMITED FILTERS 365.74 365.74 39877 09/22/98 021205 _ AMERICAN FL ='OLE R FLAG CO. U.S. FL_AG _ 4:.60 42.60 398 09/22/98 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MATS 15.903 MATS 25.8(3 41.86 390379 09/22/98 021425 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP- L FISCHER 65.00 65.00 39(3(30 09/22/98 021700 AMOCO OIL... COMPANY FUEL 21.27 21 - 27 .. 390321 09/22/98 030640 ANDON INC. HELIUM RE::NTAL•• 4 .26 4.26 39882 09/22/98 0319011 AQUA LOGIC, INC. CHEMICALS 1 , 196.00 1,196.00 0 rt i...> .•G Al.l�'Clhir � fl•::I) >1.1F'I��'C1F: "1 INC. RE::F'r'•i a: Fti VE::t 7: NCi hlraC.;H]: hIE :: Z") `i(i 713) 50 0 VOU(..HFf~� ' - 2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD - _ PA6E: 3 09/3.8/98 14:43 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 - VOUCHER/ - - CHE::C: K CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM I TEM CHECK NIJMI'i1- R DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT _ _ _ _ _ _ .. - . AMOUNT _ 39884 09/22/98 061100 BANNIGAN & KELLY P. A. AUG. SERVICES 6 6,568.30 39885 09/22/98 061906 - BAUER BUILT BATTERY 49.12 49.12 3981:36 09/22/98 070100 BEARCOM RADIOS -NEW AMBULANCES - - - -- -_ -- -- 5,629..57 - -_ -._- . _ -_ -. 5-.62 9. mil 39887 09/22/98 071510 BILL'S STANDARD SERVICE REPAIR SQUAD -BLUE CELEBRITY 164.48 164.48 3981:38 09/22/98 072000 KIX FRUIT CO. MDSE. FOR RESALE 118.75 118.75 39889 09/22/98 080925 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS UTILITIES - _ UTILITIES 36.00 UTILITIES 5. UTILITIES ---- 5.40 - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- -- -- - UTILITIES 5.40 UTILITIES 5.40 UTILITIES - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - UTILITIES 5.07 UTILITIES 709.£30 UTILITIES.- - -- - - - -- - - -- _- .- - - - - -- 1 391390 09/22/98 0812:50 BRAD RAGAN INC. TIRE 197.00 197.00 39891 09/22/98 110093 CO2 SERVICES CHEMICALS 24.20 CHEMICALS 24.40 48.60 39892 09/22/98 120400 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - - 420.55 OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 508.07 928.62 391393 09/22/98 120515 CENTRAL STORES SUPPLIES - OFFICE _ _232.90- -- - 232.90 39894 09/22/98 151800 CONCRETE FORM ENGINEERS INC. FLEX FORM RENTAL, STAKES NAIL STAKE PULLER 52.19 209.81 390395 09/2 2/9t3 170200 CUB FOODS- MAF'LEWOOD EAST HOT DOG NUNS 11.88 - 11.£38 39896 09/22/98 180100 D.C.A.,INC. DENTAL CLAIMS 1 1,717.56 39097 09/22/98 180400 DAILY & SON KLACKTOPPING DAL. DUE ON 8-•96 REQ. CLOSED 3,680.00 3 39898 09/22/98 1801300 DALCO SWITCHES 14.6:3 _ 14.63 39099 . 09/22/98 200525 DICK BLICK PHOTO FRAME 9.20 9.20 _ 39900 09/22/913 260648 1ST LINE IiEVERAGL-: HONEY HILL VANILLA, CHOC. 267.45 267.45 ;39901 09/22/98 300500 G & K SE::f':��IC:E "�i UNIFORMS & C:L.- OTHING :7.50 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 39. 69 e UNIFORIYI =i & CLOTHING 6;3.01 UNIFORMS & CLO 36. `i0 SUI::'PL. I E S" - JAN 1: TOR I AL 44.,-'.')7 VOUCHRE CITY OF MAP'LEWOOD __ .._ PAGE 4 09/18/98 14:43 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 - - - VOUCHER/ CJ- lEl,'K CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHE::C:K NUMBER DATE. NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION _ AMOUNT.- _ AMOUNT UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 85.50 - - -- - - - -- _ UNIFORMS f3:_ CLOTHING .. _. _ _.- - -- - - -- - - - - 27.50_ - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- SLJF='P'LIE:S -� .YANITORIAL_ 43.61' UN & CLOTHING 10.30 _ MATS - - 12, On - -- - SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 15.19 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 27.50 - - -- - -- - - - - -- -- --- - -- -- - - SUPPLIES -- %lANITORIAI--- -. - - -- - -- __.... _ UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 45.19 SUP'P'LIES - .'JANITORIAL 11.20 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING - SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 50 .2 1 8 - UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 27.50 __ - - - - -- - - -- --- ---- - - - - -- -- - - -� -- - - - -- _ .. - - -- - - SUPP'LIES. -- JANITORIAL -- -- - -- - - - -- 46.34 - -- U NIFORMS - & CLOTHING 27.50 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 42.77 -- - - - -.. UNIFORM $ CLOTHING - - - -- SUP'P'LIES - JANITORIAL 39.69 MATS 41.27 '- - - - - - -- - -- -- - -- - -- - -- . _. _ UNIFO & CLOTHING -- - - - - -- -- 1 0.300 -- MATS 12.00 SUP'P'LIES - JANITORIAL 15.19 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING - UNIFORMS & CLOTHI146 38.71 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 25.07 1,002.42 :59902 09!:_2/943 3101:10 GONYEA HOMES 1420 MARY ST. N 1, 000. 00 1420 MARY ST. N 25.21 1 39903 09/22/98 310650 GOPHER DISPOSAL AUGUST RECYCLING 16,118.96 16, 118.96 39904 09/ 22/98 - 310680 - -- GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING BI 'N, CERAMIC SOCKET _ BASE _ 104 -_ .22 - - -- - -- -- 04. 1 - I ZS9905 i 09/22/98 320250 GRAF, DAVE AUG. KARATE 144.00 144.00 :3992)6 09/22/98 320266 GRAINGER BATTERIES & TOOLS 303.23 SUPF='L.IE S 15.40 BATTERY 10.78 329.41 ::59907 0 22 32 0300 32 GREEN VALUES NURSERY � - . � SI' I;UCI: =, LOLC1f1ADCl GREEN & BLUE 690.00 - _ MAPLE. , RLJBFZLJM ' REE'I7 SUNSET' 1_`24.00 HARDWOOD CHIP 20.00 934.00 39908 09/22/98 350700 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT SUI "'PLIES 24.47 _- - F'AIN'T'- •F:'AF�K HOCKEY RINKS 957.97 982.44 - 39909 09/22/98 380815 IDEA, INC. NATIVE WILDFLOWER BROCHURES 62.30 62.30 ' 39910 09/ 22/98 38081. IOS CAPITAL COIF'IE.R LEASE 80 241.38 COI::' I ER LEASE 20% 60. 301.73 k FVA I] 491 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE.. . ..5 ' 09/18/98 14:43 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR. ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME_ DESCRIPTION 39911 09/22/98 390104 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. 0622 WINTER BROCHURE 88.92 MSNC F'057 CARDS _ _- ._ -_ -- - -_ -- -- - -- -- .._ -.- _ 5 8.9 1 39912 09/22/98 410370 KATH COMPANIES STRIFE, PADS 46.64 . - -- - - .. _. - FADS, TEMP. CONTROL,. STRIPE -_ ..- -- -- 1.19.12 - - -- - -- - - - PAD SET ROTOR 138.74 304.50 39913 09f 22/98 4+0120_ _L " _ QTRLY INSURANCE INSTATLMENT - _383.00_ QTRLY INSURANCE INSTALLMENT 403.00 - QTRLY INSURANCE INSTALLMENT 403,00- QTRLY INSURANCE INSTALLMENT - _ _ - - 44, i 64.50 _ _ - 42 3. 9 /0.50 39914 09/22/98 450480 LANDMARK CUSTOM HOMES 2493 OAK CIRCLE E 1,000.00 ----.2493 _OAK CIRCLE_ E 5.2 - - - - -11 .005._21 _ 39915 09/22/98 450485 LANDSCAPE ALTERNATIVES GRASSES /PLANTS- WEAVER SCHOOL 73.64 73.64 39916 09/22/98 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES - 68.75 68.75 39917 09/22/98 511176 MARGOLI C OMPANY 3 RED SUNSET MAPLES 6 23.02 623.02 39918 09/22/98 530560 MERIT CHEVROLET TENSIONER 31.35 31.35 39919 0.9/22/98 532551 MICROFLEX MEDICAL GLOVES 314.00 314.00 39 92 0 09/22/98 540175 _ MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. MDSE:. FOR RESALE _ s_2 61 .35 261.35 39921 09/22/913 542700 MINVALCO INC. T -STAT. SMALL TOOLS.. THERMETER 78.68 78.68 39 912 09/22/98 570090 MOGREN BROS. ROLL SOD 14.38 14.38 39923 09/22/98 57050 MOUMOI, _ FRED _ _ - -- - -- DANCERS NAT. -' L NIGHT OUT ..__ -_ _ - - 3 - - -- 1 J 0.00 •- - - -.. _ _ 130.00 _ 3992 09 /z A-'/98 630070 N . Y . S . C . A . CERTIFICATION OF YOUTH COACHES 590.00 590.00 39925 09/22/98 640550 NELSON, JEAN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 113.6 MI 31.81 31.81 39926 09/22/98 660900 NORTH STAR "TURF. INC. WASHER, SPACER.., F'I N - - -�- - -- - 55.21 _ - - -- 55.21 :39927 09/22/90 661755 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 3.14 UTILITIES _ 4.71 - UTILITIES 3.14 _ UTILITIES 1,449.78 - - - - - - UTILITIES _ - 8. 4 p66.90 -- - - - - - - - - - UTILITIES 7.54 UTILITIES 43.06 9,578.27 78.27 3992 09/22/98 68057;51 OCCUI'- 'AT:IONAI_ HLTH SERV /AL_L-INA PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS- -SHOTS 183.00 • PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS- SHOTS* 61.50 F'RI -- EMi='L- OYMEN'T 1 °'HYSICALS- -SHOT "S 602.50 PHY i:I CALS) -SHOTS 61.50 491 103 VOUCHRE. CITY OF ,MAFLEWOOD PAGE- 6 ' 09/1>rs/9£i 14:4 ".i VOUCHER/CHECK K REGI STE'R I FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ - - - -- - - -- _ -- -- -- - - - - - -- - Ca If::CK CHECK VE•NI)OR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT PRE- -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS-SHOTS 61.50 PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS- -SHOTS 1. 105.50 39929 09/22/98 691160 ON SITE SANITATION SATELLITE SERVICE 5 ,9 . 6 5 - -- - - - - _SATELLITE SERVICE -- - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - .5.65 SATELLITE SERVICE 55.65 _ SATELLITE SERVICE 111.30 - -- -- - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - - - - SATELLITE SERVICE _ - --- 55.65 - - - - -- - - -55Y SATELLITE SERVICE 6Cti - - - - -- - -- - - -- SATELLITE SERVICE 95.6;:1 SATELLITE SERVICE 55.65 SATELLITE SERVICE 55.65 SATELLITE SERVICE 55.65 SATELLITE SERVICE 55._65__ SATELLITE SERVICE 55.65 - 803.45 - 39930 09/22/98 - _ - - - -- 700800 - PAPER WAREHOUSE, INC. BALLOONS ' -- -66.21 - -- -._. .- - 66.21 �. 39931 09/22/98 700870 PARAGON BUSINESS SYSTEMS SERVICE 9 -15 - 10 -14 101.12 101.12 ` 39932 09/2 /9Q 712100 PITNEY BOWES INC. POSTAGE METER RENTAL 1,213.00 - - -- SOF'TGUARD RATE PROTECTION FLAN 237.00 EQUIP MAINT- ELECTRONIC SCALE - - 240.00 EQUIP MAINT- MAILING MACHINE - - 1 2,8 5.00 - 3993 - 09/22/98 - - - - - - - -- 712260 - -- - POOLSIDE - - - POOL SUP'P'LIES - -- - -- - - - - - -- - - -- 13.31 - - - - - - 31 --- - - - - -- - - - - - . -- > 9914 09/22/98 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY PROD. 96 -17 RESTRIPPING STREET 190.38 190.38 399 09/22/98 742110 REGIONS HOSPITAL DRUGS & SUPPLIES 20.54 20.54 39936 09/22/98 750550 RE INHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS CHIPS, KETCHUF',REI_ISH,MUSTAFiD 621.75 62 1 .75 39937 09/22/98 761313 ROCHESTER MIDLAND SANOR SPRINGTIME CONC. SERVICE 79.24 79.24 39938 09/22/98 780 300 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. r ..' UPPL_ I ES - OFFICE 58046 SUI 7 '1='L I ES -- OFFICE 104.99 S)UPPLIE::Ei - OFFICE 45.58 SUI= 'PLIES -- OFFICE 4.99 {••IOMI =: OF -F . C:AF:T , CALENI)AF�S, MAR KE:-F� 82.68 POP-UPS v BINDERS , INSERTS, CLIP'S 88.03. SUI °'F•'l.. I E ::S - OFFI 4. 99- 379.72 39939 09/22/98 780600 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT COTTON MOP, GLASS CLEANER 118.57 PAPER BAGS,FRUIT SNACKS,CANDY 81.92 - _ 200.49 3 9940 09/112 /98 8000751 SEARS MISC. TOOL-S 21A"--'. 99 SI'IALL. 1 93.1 3 306.12 39941 09/22/98 820300 PROFESSIONAL_ MASSAGES CENTER MASSAGE:- AUGUST 1 l 103 VOUCHRE2' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE. 7 09118198 14:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ ITEM CHE:-*C K DESCRIPTION HEC C 'K C HECK VE*NDOR V E* NDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 39942 09/22/98 840405 ST. PAUL, CITY OF' 39943 09/22/98 840651 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS 39944 09/22/98 843338 STILL, VERN 39945 09/22/98 850320 SUBURBAN -SPORTSWEAR INC. 39946 09/22/98 850 395 SUNRAY B-T-B 39947 09/22/98 860080 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC 39948 09/22/98 860410 TSE INC. 39949 09/221/98 860650 TARGET STORES-CSA A/R 39950 09/22/98 861695 THOMPSON ASSOCIATES 39951 09/•2/98 871.400 TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT ,)99',-.-,2 09/2'd':'/98 E390970 USA TODAY 39953 09/22/98 890980 USA WASTE SERVICES OF MINN 39954 09/22/98 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 39955 09/22/98 900170 UNITl'---D ["l-E-CTRIC COMPANY 399'56 09/22/98 900173 UNITL.D HOSPITAL 39957 09/2.*-* 9001.80 U.S. POSTAL SERVICAHL' ITEM ITEM CHE:-*C K DESCRIPTION -AMOU.NT -AMOUNT_ RADIO REPAIR 272.13 RADIO REPAIR ---477 s ti.Q.. ADVERTISING 1,168.48 1 MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 59.67 59067 - ADD '.1- SHIRTS -STAFF NATl----NlQHT 7 ti. STEERING HOSE 42.91 SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 171.15 214.06 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 500.00 OTHER CONSTRUCTION. COSTS.. KOHLMAN OVERLOOK PARK DEV 12 KO I HLMAN OVERLOOK PARK DEV 40 KOHLMAN OVERLOOK PARK .DEV -27-5,15--- -54.$564,75.. JANITORIAL SERVICES. 892.08 892.08 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 122.45 CART CARVER 82.12 POP H2O 23.91 228.48 PERSONAL ASSESS. FOR ASST. MGR 450.00 450.00 DJ SHOW-NAT'L NIGHT OUT 275.00 275.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 119.00 -.119.00 RUBBISH REMOVAL 294.84 RUBBISH REMOVAL -96. RUBBISH REMOVAL 124.08 RUBBISH REMOVAL 93.18 RECYCLING 731.19 1 --. 3 339.82 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 181.71. UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 82..75 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 95.x'.6 UNIF*ORMS & CLOTHING 97.96 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 65.6`1 Ulq I FORMS & CLOTH NG 114.77 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 02.75 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING) 43.00 763.85 HEATER ELEMENT 49.51 49,51 F EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 224.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 56.00 280.00 POSTAGE 3,000.00 3,00().00 X , VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE. 8 09/18/98 14:43 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ E3iE*C:K CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK _ NUMBER DATE - - - NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION _ _ _ _. _ . . _ . - AMOUTAT -. - __ _ _. - _ -AMOUNT-1. 39958 09/22/98 901300 UP'P'ER MIDWEST SALES CO. PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES 226.94 CLEANER BRUSHES - - - -- 2 32.,85 . -- -- -- -459.79_ 39959 09/22/98 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM F. COMM. F'LBG. INSP. 200.00 . COMM. P'LNG. INSP. . - -- -.2 50.00 COMM. P'L$G . INSP. 2 50.00- 200.00 9960_ 09/22/98 940580 . WATERPROOFING CO.., INC ..- _REPAIR & MAINT /BUILDINGS , 52 3.8 528. X30_ TOTAL CHECKS 199 X 106... 90. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DDIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 ALLENSPACH, SHERRY 3 25.77 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 CARLSON, THERES E 16 5 3.3 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 FAUST DANIEL F , 3178.74 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 ANDERSON,CAROLE J 704991 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 DEHN,DEBORAH 1440.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 HANGSLEBEN,RICHARD 1940952 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 CARLE , JEANETTE E 14 31.8 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 JAGOE , CAROL 1410,34 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 OLSON, SANDRA 7 41.91 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 POWELL, PHILIP 1552931 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 ALDRIDGE , MARK 18 91.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 BECKER RONALD D � 242 6.68 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 BOHL JOHN C , 1974.28 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 FLOR TIMOTHY � 2061.38 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 KVAM,DAVID 2032.33 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 STEFFEN,SCOTT L 2245.13 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 YOUNGREN,JAMES 2483.54 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 EVERS ON , PAUL 15 7 2.71 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 FRAS ER , JOHN 216 6.6 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 ADELSON , LINDA 15 4.2 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 STAHNKE JULIE A , 1645.82 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 HAIDER,KENNETH G 3105.20 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 PRIEFER,WILLIAM 1714.62 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 LUNDSTEN, LANCE 214 8.2 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 OSWALD , ERI CK D 14 6 6.4 2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 DUCHARME , JOHN 16 2 6.5 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT .09/18/98 PECK DENNI S L � ,17 69.72 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 ANDERSON,BRUCE 2745.70 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 MARUSKA, RK A 1933982 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 GREW- HAYMAN,JANET M 758.70 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 COLEMAN,MELINDA 2706.20 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 EKSTRAND , THOMAS G 18 4 7.15 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 ROBERTS , KENNETH 17 4 8.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 EASTMAN , THOMAS E 2 0 0 8.0 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 HURLEY , STEPHEN 19 7 7.6 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J 19 7 6.2 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 EDGE DOUGLAS � 1432.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 CROS SON , LINDA 1415.4 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 LIVINGSTON,JOYCE L 868957 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 KNAUSS,PETER 803.28 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 PALMA 2003966 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 JOHNSON, KEVIN 1910952 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 WARMAN, ROBIN 9 3 7.2 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 DOHERTY , KATHLEEN M 14 2 0.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 JENSEN MATTHEW � 844.90 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 LE,SHERYL 2724.95 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 DOWDLE,VIRGINIA 1954908 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 ROSSBACH,GEORGE 370.20 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 LUT Z ,DAVID P 15 0 0.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 SCHLINGMAN , PAUL 1718.6 2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER --- _--- -. - - -- CHECK DATE ---- - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ - AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 - - - -- FARR, DIANE M --.------------ 315.51 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 GRAF MICHAEL 8 61.3 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 VORWERK,ROBERT E 1986.52 DIRECT DEPOSIT _ 09/18/98 NAGEL,BRYAN 1465.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 GUILFOILE,KAREN E 1799.62 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 HELLE,KERRY 1697.72 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09 /1 8 /98 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1748.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/ OSTER I ANDREA J 14 2 0.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 ANDREWS , SCOTT A 2051o04 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 RUNNING , ROBERT 13 9 2.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 SAVAGEAU, STEPHEN D 1152.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 BARTEL, DENISE 60.75 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/ 18/98 CARLSON DALE � 325.77 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 MARTINSON, CAROL F 1478923 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 HIEBERT,STEVEN 2142.82 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 DUNN,ALICE 2074.23 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 ANZALDI , MANDY 60011 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 CORNER, AMY L 91.2 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 STEVENS , MARY CATHERINE 3 6.4 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 HORSNELL, JUDITH A 112 8.8 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 SEEGER GERALD F � 284976 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 MOREHEAD,JESSICA R 198080 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 STILL I VERNON T 1899.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 LOMBARD I ,JAMES D 113 8.6 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 HUTCHINSON , ANN E 16 7 5.4 2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 COLEMAN, PHILIP 3 6 3.15 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 BELDE , STANLEY 1784992 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 ATKINS KATHERINE 7 9 6. , 17 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 FRY,PATRICIA 1387932 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 RENSLOW,RITA 66915 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 BAKKE,LONN A 1435.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 BERGERON,JOSEPH A 2109.47 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 CONNOLLY,RICK A 65990 DIRECT D EPOSIT 09/18/98 BOWMAN ,RICK A 2 0 5 6.4 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 CAVETT ,CHRISTOPHER M 2 0 6 5.8 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 KANE ,MICHAEL R 19 3 3.8 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 KOPPEN , MARVIN 3 2 5.7 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 CHRISTENSEN, JODIE D 526918 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 STAPLES , PAULINE 2 2 3 0.6 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 KITTRIDGE V ,KE IN L 325.77 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 PIKE,GARY K 1260.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 ICKES,SHERI 1033.34 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 THOMALLA,DAVID J 2145.56 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN 14 9 9.67 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18./98 DRI SCOLL, MARGARET H 3 0 3.15 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 HEINZ , STEPHEN J 2 0 62.05 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 N NELSON, JEAN 893963 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 KELLY,LISA 925.42 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 TETZLAFF,JUDY A 517.43 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 LOHMAN , JANINE D. 505926 r CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 GOPLEN ,NICHOLAS P 4 2 3.5 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 WINGER, DONALD S 3010o77 DIRECT DEPOSIT 09/18/98 PARR, GAIL L 150.8 8 . 67478 09/18/98 ERICSON,MICHAEL 2076.92 67479 09/18/98 McGUIRE,MICHAEL A 3953.17 6748 09/18/98 ZICK 178.25 67481. 09/18/98 WHITE,BARRY T 42.50 67482 09/18/98 CUDE,LARRY J 369.15 67483 09/18/98 DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J 383.09 67484 09/18/98 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 64900 67485 09/18/98 URBANSKI,HOLLY S 474956 67486 09/18/98 JACKSON,MARY L 1132.12 67487 09/18/98 KELSEY,CONNIE L 489924 67488 09/18/98 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 1536.76 67489 09/18/98 NIVEN,AMY S 133.88 67490 09/18/98 CASAREZ,GINA 1228.12 67491 09/18/98 JOHNSON,BONNIE 911.42 67492 09/18/98 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1387.33 67493 09/18/98 PALANK,MARY KAY 1570908 67494 09/18/98 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1546.12 67495 09/18/98 RYAN,MICHAEL 2720.02 67496 09/18/98 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1513.43 67497 09/18/98 BANICK,JOHN J 2156912 67498 09/18/98 BARTZ,PAUL 1772.80 67499 09/18/98 HALWEG,KEVIN R 2156.12 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 67500 09/18/98 HERBERT,MICHAEL J 1899.32 67501 09/18/98 KARTS, FLINT D 2113.72 67502 09/18/98 LOU,YEN LIN 195.00 67503 09/18/98 MACFARLANE,MELVIN R 1417.87 67504 09/18/98 RABBETT,KEVIN 2277.67 67505 09/18/98 RAZSKAZOFF,DALE 1899.32 67506 09/18/98 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 1749.96 67507 09/18/98 STAFNE,GREGORY L 1969916 67508 09/18/98 STOCKTON,DERRELL T 1899.32 67509 09/18/98 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 1959982 67510 09/18/98 WATCZAK,LAURA 1823932 67511 09/18/98 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 2112923 67512 09/18/98 HALE,THOMAS M 1401928 67513 09/18/98 MEEHAN,JAMES 2047920 67514 09/18/98 MELANDER,JON A 2751.25 67515 09/18/98 ROSSMAN,DAVID A 1884.56 67516 09/18/98 THIENES,PAUL 1872.12 67517 09/18/98 GERVAIS- JR,CLARENCE N 13795-0 67518 09/18/98 BOYER,SCOTT K 2134.55 67519 09/18/98 FEHR,JOSEPH P 1836912 67520 09/18/98 FLAUGHER,JAYME L 1698.22 67521 09/18/98 LAFFERTY,WALTER 1882.41 67522 09/18/98 MAYNARD,WILLIAM J 38.2,22 67523 09/18/98 RABINE,JANET L 1645.82 67524 09/18/98 HEWITT,JOEL A 2559.34 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 67525 09/18/98 ZWIEG,SUSAN C. 67526 09/18/98 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 67527 09/18/98 DARST,JAMES 67528 09/18/98 FREBERG,RONALD L 67529 09/18/98 MEYER,GERALD W 67530 09/18/98 THOMAS— JR,STEVEN 67531 09/18/98 WESTERHAUS,KEVIN M 67532 09/18/98 CORWIN,ERIC B 67533 09/18/98 ELIAS,JAMES G 67534 09/18/98 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 67535 09/18/98 PRIEBE,WILLIAM 67536 09/18/98 SIMMONS,LARA R 67537 09/18/98 ANDERSON,ROBERT S 67538 09/18/98 EDSON,DAVID B 67539 09/18/98 HELEY,ROLAND B 67540 09/18/98 HINNENKAMP,GARY 67541 09/18/98 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 67542 09/18/98 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 67543 09/18/98 SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES 67544 09/18/98 LARSON,SHERRI A 67545 09/18/98 SOUTTER,CHRISTINE 67546 09/18/98 THOMPSON,DEBRA J 67547 09/18/98 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 67548 09/18/98 SCHROEDER,JEFFREY J 67549 09/18/98 ANDERSON,EVERETT AMOUNT 1506.77 1473.72 1433.72 14 8 8.12 .1525.32 1433.72 340.00 576. 00 1769.72 1874.10 .1705.72 599 25 1462.92 1488.12 1488o12 14 3 3.72 1433.72 1460.92 1460.92 195.50 185.94 525.91 1394.52 531.25 544.59 �3J CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 67550 09/18/98 OLSON,ARNOLD G 320.00 67551 09/18/98 OSTROM,MARJORIE 2084.22 67552 09/18/98 WENGER,ROBERT J 1737.72 67553 09/18/98 BALLESTRAZZE,THAD M 26.43 67554 09/18/98 BRANDSTROM,JULIET M 120.00 67555 09/18/98 BRANDSTROM,RYAN M. 51.00 67556 09/18/98 FINN,GREGORY S 1197.02 67557 09/18/98 FLUG,ELAINE R 60923 67558 09/18/98 GALBRAITH,CHRISTOPHER 300.0 -0 67559 09/18/98 STIEN,MARY 1138.62 67560 09/18/98 STIEN,NATHANIEL 131.40 67561 09/18/98 BREHEIM,ROGER W 1483.32 67562 09/18/98 GERMAIN,DAVID 1576.56 67563 09/18/98 NADEAU,EDWARD A 2010.62 67564 09/18/98 NORDQUIST,RICHARD 1456.12 67565 09/18/98 SCHULTZ,SCOTT M 1201.33 67566 09/18/98 COONS,MELISSA 853.07 67567 09/18/98 GLASS,JEAN 886.48 67568 09/18/98 HOIUM,SHEILA 814.89 67569 09/18/98 HORWATH,RONALD J 222.09 67570 09/18/98 MICHALSKI,ANDREW M 438.75 67571 09/18/98 NEAMY,MARK W 159.80 67572 09/18/98 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 1061.82 67573 09/18/98 SCHOEBERL,KAYLENE M 329932 67574 09/18/98 SHOBERG,CARY J 81.25 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 67575 09/18/98 ABRAHAMSON,BRYAN K .84.15 67576 09/18/98 ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L. 26.00 67577 09/18/98 ANDERSON,JULIE M 133983 67578 09/18/98 BADEN,ALISON L 196.45 67579 09/18/98 BADEN,MATHIAS 292.52 67580 09/18/98 BITTNER,KATIE C 268.00 67581 09/18/98 CHAPMAN,JENNY A 9.81 67582 09/18/98 CONLIN,PAMELA 20.25 67583 09/18/98 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 86.69 67584 09/18/98 HAGSTROM,LINDSEY S 39.00 67585 0 9/ 18 / 9 8 HAWKE , RYAN A 12 9.2 O 67586 09/18/98 HAWKINS,LISA A 36.40 67587 09/18/98 HEDLUND,LAUREL R 87.75 67588 09/18/98 HEIM,ANDREA J 266.50 67589 09/18/98 HOLMGREN,LEAH M 54.00 67590 09/18/98 HOULE,DENISE L 54960 67591 09/18/98 HUPPERT,ERIN M 306.39 67592 09/18/98 JOHNSON ROBERT P 369.25 67593 09/18/98 JOHNSON,STETSON 297.3.8 67594 09/18/98 JOHNSON,SUSAN M 42.00 67595 09/18/98 KOEHNEN,MARY B 225.00 67596 09/18/98 KOEPKE,JENNIFER M 39.48 67597 09/18/98 MAGNUSON,BETH M 86.69 67598 09/18/98 MEYER,HEATHER ANN 26.00 67599 09/18/98 MOTZ,ERIN M 156.00 LIN CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 67600 09/18/98 OWEN,JONATHAN 80.40 67601 09/18/98 SACKMANN,LAURA C 51.38 67602 09/18/98 SCHLUETER, LOUISE E 7590 -0 67603 09/18/98 SHERRILL,MASON D 58.95 67604 09/18/98 SMITLEY,SHARON L 168.70 67605 09/18/98 SWANER,JESSICA 226.30 67606 09/18/98 THIBODEAU,KELLY M 919.25 67607 09/18./98 TIBODEAU,HEATHER J 1.08913 67608 09/18/98 WARMAN,JOANNE M 191.75 67609 09/18/98 WARNER,CAROLYN 120938 67610 09/18/98 WEDES,CARYL H 91.25 67611 09/18/98 WOODMAN,ALICE E 117980 67612 09/18/98 BOSLEY,CAROL 202969 67613 09/18/98 DISKERUD,HEATHER A 13`9.06 67614 09/18/98 FLEMING,KATHY A 187950 67615 09/18/98 FLEMING,LAURA C 180000 67616 09/18/98 MACIOCH,AMY L 67.50 67617 09/18/98 MALDONADO,ANGELA M 21.00 67618 09/18/98 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 160900 67619 09/18/98 SPANGLER,EDNA E 2.8.40 67620 09/18/98 ANTON,SARAH E 93.00 67621 09/18/98 BEHAN,JAMES 1193.72 67622 09/18/98 BLAKESLEY, JEFFERY DEAN 136.00 67623 09/18/98 CALLEN,KATIE E 72.00 67624 09/18/98 CHAPEAU,GREG M 174.0:0 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 67625 09/18/98 FULLER,AMY R 88920 67626 09/18/98 GLASS,BRIDGET M 90000 67627 09/18/98 JAHN,DAVID J 1319963 67628 09/18/98 KOSKI,JOHN F 525.34 67629 09/18/98 KYRK,BREANNA K 126.00 67630 09/18/98 LONETTI,JAMES F 645096 67631 09/18/98 MATTESON,FRANK M 69.00 67632 09/18/98 OWEN,BEN A 108.00 67633 09/18/98 POWERS,NICOLE L 102.00 67634 09/18/98 PRINS,KELLY M 36.00 67635 09/18/98 SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M 141.75 67636 09/18/98 SEYLER,KIMBERLY A 144.00 67637 09/18/98 SKRYPEK,JOSHUA L 341..38 67638 09/18/98 STEINHORST, JEFFREY 158.64 67639 09/18/98 SWANSON,LYLE 1413.30 67640 09/18/98 SWANSON,SARAH C 136.50 67641 09/18/98 SWANSON,VERONICA 968.92 67642 09/18/98 YOUNG,DILLON J 37944 67643 09/18/98 AICHELE,CRAIG J 821.54 67644 09/18/98 MULVANEY,DENNIS M 162.8.12 67645 09/18/98 PRIEM, STEVEN A. 1325.40 284009.67 AGENDA NO. G3 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director � RE: Non-Waiver of Statutory Liability Limits for Insurance DATE: September 21,1998 PROPOSAL Aotion bir, co=dll Rejecte Date It is proposed that the city not waive the statutory liability limits for insurance so that individual claimants will not be able to recover more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory liability limits apply. BACKGROUND For many years the city's liability insurance has had a combined single limit of $600,0 per occurrence. The coverage explicitly provided that the per - claimant limit of $200,000 was waived. Effective 1 -1 -98 the statutory liability limits were increased to $300,000 per claimant and $750,000 per occurrence. The city's liability insurance was automatically amended for these higher limits. The city now has the option to not waive the statutory liability limits for insurance so that individual claimants will not be able to recover more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory liability limits apply. The advantage of this is that the city would save approximately $5,000 annually on its liability insurance. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city not waive the statutory liability limits for insurance so that individual claimants will not be able to recover more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory liability limits apply. PAFINANCEXWP\AGNVNSL1M1T.WPD SEP. -18' 98 (FRI) 08: S5 CORP. 4 INSURANCE TEL; 612 8939402 P. 001 CORPORATE 4 INS AGENCYv INC 7220 METRO ]BOULEVARD EDINA, MN 55439 -2133 Phone # (612 )993 -92111 Fax # (612)893P-9402 To: City of Maplewood ATTN4, Dan Faust ]'ax 4: (612)779 -3 570 From: Michael Hadtrath Re: Liability Limits Dan, Per our conversation, to confirm, the city has the option of holdinS the tort ,governmental liability limit at $300,000 per person and $730,000 per occurrence. In the event that an occurrence falls outside the tort limit, Le Federal claims, the liability limit will be the dull $750,000. The city can waive the tort limit and provide full $750,000 occurrence limits for all claims. This option increased your liability premium by 3 '/2% Reasons to waive the tort limit are as follows: ■ Moral obligation to a single injured person to provide coverage above $300,000 should the city be held negligent. ■ To have more funds available should the tort limit be thrown out in court. Please have the fonri provided by the LMCIT signed and returned. I will forward it to underwriting upon receipt. Please call if you have questions. SEP. -18' 98 (FRI) 0 CORP. 4 INSURANCE TEL : 612 8939402 P. 002 LMCIT LIABILffY COVERAGE - WAIVER FORM m the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide Cities obtaining liability coverage from � • part liabilit iirnit� to the extent of the coverage pur+chased, The whether or not to waive the statutory t y waive or not to wive the statutory limits has the following effects: .. decision to wai t ine st t to tort limit$, an individual cl aimant would be able to recover o 1,'the�i des . total which all c1 aim is 0 000 on an claim to which the statutory tort lets apply. The more than � Y 'ta apply would be lim ted c� recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort lung pp y would be able t � t city purchases e s t a t u tory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or no the ty F to $7��,0��. Thaw � rY optional excess liability coverage. • to r t l and does not p urchase excess liability coverage, a single If the city w aives the st���et�r� rt I � c la im ant could potentla1ly r v�r p a eco u to $7S 000 on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a. single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also b es limited to $750,000, regardless of the number of claimants. s the statutory tor limits and p urc hases excess l iability coverages a si ngle claim t �,�'ti�e city waive � � mould potent rec an amount u p to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits ap ply w uld also be limited amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. �ted to � • snuni+c a1 tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. Claims to which the s tatuto � p • ' a e made b the ca council, Cities purchasing coverage must complete and rct rn This decision must b y this form too LMCIT before the effective date of the coverage. For further infoTmation, contact LM IT. You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney. • accepts liability cov limits of $ from the Tea of The pity of � acc p �' cov Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). Check ogre: The city DOES NOT" WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established - � by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. c� WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes The 1 466.04 to the extent of the litmus of the liability coverage obtained from LMCI a Date of city co uncil meeting . Signature position Return this c ompd � etecl orm to LM CITY 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul, MN. 551 - 2044 Page 1 of I Agenda MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Introduction Michael McGuire, City M Karen Guilfoile, City Clei September 21, 1998 Request for City Contingency Funds G4 `d o rs Yodited Rejeatedo- Date The City Clerk Deputy Registrar division is in need of a replacement of a desk -top copier used in processing individual motor vehicle transactions. I have been told by copier maintenance that it would not be feasible to continue to repair the current machine. This item was not included in the 1998 or 1999 proposed budget. Recommendation It is recommended that Council approve transferring $2,000 to the City Clerk Deputy Registrar division for equipment replacement. AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Michael McGuire From: Chief of Police Donald S. Winger Subject: Donation To Canine Program Date: September 9, 1998 Agenda Item G5 Action by Council Endorse Mo di�'i e DU L e Introduction The Maplewood Police Department has received a 500 ' p $ donation from Ms. Dons Hansen. B= round Ms. Hansen has donated $500 to the Maplewood Police Department and asked that at the money be used to purchase equipment for its canine program: After speaking with current and past canine officers it was decided that the purchase of a remote canine deployment system would be the best use of this donation. The system allows the offs n y officer too open squad door from a distance, allowing the canine to render assistance in times of trouble. Recommendation It is recommended that the Maplewood Police Department • p p be allowed to accept the donation from Ms. Hansen and use the money to. _purchase the remote canine deployment . s ystem. Action Required Submit to the City Council for their review and approval. DSWJs Agenda Item G � AGENDA REPORT City Man Michael McGuire To. y g � From: Chief of Police Donald S. Winger Actjon by C ouncil . Subject: Donation to Police Department Date: September 11, 1998 Endorse Introduction Dade The Maplewood Police Department has received.a $100 donation from Boston Health Care Systems. - Background On August 27, 1998, an officer from the Maplewood Police Department attended Boston Health Care Systems' annual picnic. The officer fingerprinted children and spoke to them and their parents about being safe. Several safety handouts were also distributed to those present. To show their appreciation, Boston Health Care Systems has donated $100 to the department. They have requested that the money be used to purchase educational materials and handouts so that others may also benefit from this information. Recommendat i on It is recommended that the Police Department be allowed to accept this donation and that the money be used to purchase materials for future safety presentations. Action Required- Submit to the City Council for review and approval . DSW: i s Agenda Item G l MEMORANDUM Action by Council.: TO: City Manager FROM: Ken .Roberts, Associate Planner indorse SUBJECT: Livable Act -1999 Participation Modified DATE September 15, 1998 Rejected..,:..,..... Date INTRODUCTION As a city participating in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, the Metropolitan Council requires Maplewood to adopt a resolution each year to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program. BACKGROUND On November 13, 1995, the Maplewood City Council adopted a resolution to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. On December 18, 1995, the City council adopted the housing goals agreement and benchmarks for Maplewood. The City council adopted these with the understanding that the city will make its best efforts to meet or exceed the established housing benchmarks. On June 10, 1996, the council adopted the 1996 Maplewood Housing Action Plan. On October 14, 1996, the City council adopted a resolution to continue to participate in Metropolitan Livable Communities Act programs in 1997. On October 13, 1997, the council adopted a resolution to continue to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act programs in 1998. DLSCUSSION The attached resolution Continues Maplewood's participation in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. This makes Maplewood eligible for grants and loans for housing programs available through this act. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on page 2. This resolution is for Maplewood's 1999 participation in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. kr /p: miscell /Ica -4. mem Attachment: 1999 Resolution RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATING IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CALENDAR YEAR 1999 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Minnesota Statutes Section 473.25 to 473.254) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund intended to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes Section 473.121 and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the Tax Base Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing Incentive Account, is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive Certain polluted sites Cleanup funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the municipality is . participating. in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Minnesota Statutes Section 473.254; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life -cycle housing goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, each city must identify to the Metropolitan Council the actions the city plans to take to meet the established housing goals through preparation of the Housing Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council adopted, by resolution after a public hearing, negotiated affordable and life -Cycle housing goals for each participating municipality; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality that elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year; and WHEREAS, for calendar year 1999, a metropolitan area city that participated in the Local Housing Incentive Account program during the calendar year 1998, can continue to participate under Minnesota Statutes Section 473.254 if: (a) the city elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15, 1998; and (b) the Metropolitan Council and the city have successfully negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the city: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT Maplewood elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during 1999. By: Mayor By. City Clerk The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on September 28, 1998. 2 Agenda" item G MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Final Plat PROJECT: Oak Ridge Estates Fourth Addition DATE: September 18, 1998 INTRODUCTION Action by Council: Endoxse Modlfi edL Rejecte Date Tom Gonyea is requesting that the city council approve the Oak Ridge Estates Fourth Addition final plat. Mr. Gonyea represents the property owners. This final plat is the fourth phase of the Oak Ridge development, and would create 19 lots for houses and one outlot. This plat is along 9 Montana Avenue, east of Sterling Street. (See the maps on pages 3 - 5.) BACKGROUND On February 8, 1993, the city council approved the preliminary plat, subject to seven conditions. On January 24, 1994, the city council approved a time extension for Phase One of the Oak Ridge Estates preliminary plat. This time extension was subject to the February 8, 1993 . ry conditions. The council said that the city shall complete the annual review for Phases Two, Three and Four after June 1, 1994. On June 13, 1994, the city council approved a One -year time extension for Phases 2-4 of the Oak Ridge Estates preliminary plat. This time extension was subject to the Februa 8, 1993 . rY conditions. On September 12, 1994, the city council approved the Oak Ridge Estates final plat. This plat created 37 lots for houses in the first phase of the development. On May 22, 1995, the council approved a one -year time extension for Phases 2-4 of the Oak Ridge Estates preliminary plat. This extension was subject to the February 8, 1993 conditions. On May 13, 1996, the council approved a one -year time extension for Phases 2-4 of the plat and revised the conditions of approval. (See the council minutes on pages 7 -9.) On May 12, 1997, the council approved a one -year time extension for Phases 2-4 of the plat, subject to May 13, 1996 conditions of approval. On September 8, 1997, the council approved the Oak Ridge Estates Second Addition final plat. This plat created 56 lots for houses in the second phase of the development. On May 21, 1998, the council approved the Oak Ridge Estates Third Addition final plat. This plat created 15 lots for houses in the third phase of the development. On June 22, 1998, the council approved a one -year time extension for Phase 4 of the plat, subject to May 13, 1996 conditions of approval. DISCUSSION Mr. Gonyea is progressing. with this phase of the plat. The contractor has installed the utilities and wi l start the street construction soon. Mr. Gonyea has finished all the conditions the council required for final plat approval. This plat does have an outlot on the north side of Montana Avenue about 600 feet east of Sterling Street. This outlot has room for one additional lot and street right -of -way if the city decides not to buy the land north of the site for open space. If the city does buy the adjacent land, then the developer will plat the outlot into a lot and trail for, access to the open space. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Oak Ridge Estates Fourth Addition final plat. Approval is subject to the: 1. County recording the deeds, deed restrictions and covenants required by the city. 2. Surveyor changing Montana Court to Montana Avenue on the final plat before recording. p:sec24 -29 /oakrdg -4.fin Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Proposed Final Plat 4.. Preliminary Plat 5. 5 -13 -96 Council Minutes 6. Proposed Final Plat (Separate Attachment) 2 Attachment 1 d o currn NU M N E D � GOODRICH HOLLOWAY ��, COURSE IdARYJOE LN. .50> 2• TIERNEY AVE. RIPLEY AVE. �i KINGSTON AVE, J N w PRICE AVE. iii ND PoPLEY AVE. W NORTH SAINT PAUL 7 ltJ J Y • U � f MICHAEL OR 2 REBECCA OR PINETREE NEBRASKA � P� 2 3 4 � 4 1v E �oR 1440N OfKHILL CT IIMGELA CT 5 P#c TREE DR Pro'* ,� 6 BIRCHVIEW DR v 8 8 7 7 ROLLING HxLS DR G% An 8 Q WEA RT LN �r AvE. • H� > TI LS N COYt7TE 1 ANMOPE WAY so Ct AVE. BIS 92 AMBER44 CK LN Z 4 BOBCAT �- LN 1 4 5 5 COUGER LN HAWTHORNE AVE 120ON E. wRY�AN� AVE. E. ROSE x\3 AVE. L, GER c o GERAN��� 9 MAGNOLIA AVE. • pw* Beaver g z L ke PL. � z 0 = o HARVESTER AVE Z .LOCATION MAP 3 i (N. St. P.) � • IdARYJOE LN. 2• TIERNEY AVE. 3. MEADpW DR. 4: PoPLEY AVE. NORTH SAINT PAUL AVE. 9 <8> n iii 2. �P,,,aa°k o 3. 4. KNOLL CIR. � RI PLEY AV 3 � � KINGSTON AVE. MGCNK:HT LN N b c Y i x � W2PENTEUR AVE. j IOMO AVE. V N � N HOYT AVE. Mph AVE. MO ltJ J Y • U � f MICHAEL OR 2 REBECCA OR PINETREE NEBRASKA � P� 2 3 4 � 4 1v E �oR 1440N OfKHILL CT IIMGELA CT 5 P#c TREE DR Pro'* ,� 6 BIRCHVIEW DR v 8 8 7 7 ROLLING HxLS DR G% An 8 Q WEA RT LN �r AvE. • H� > TI LS N COYt7TE 1 ANMOPE WAY so Ct AVE. BIS 92 AMBER44 CK LN Z 4 BOBCAT �- LN 1 4 5 5 COUGER LN HAWTHORNE AVE 120ON E. wRY�AN� AVE. E. ROSE x\3 AVE. L, GER c o GERAN��� 9 MAGNOLIA AVE. • pw* Beaver g z L ke PL. � z 0 = o HARVESTER AVE Z .LOCATION MAP 3 i Attachment Z ( U3 L 2 4.« _ AV E _ 1 )11.4 1 9 RO „ s* s » .+ 7t•' .,..`. O! laa' .�e,Na Mret 1a Irl.•a' M.q / r Tgs Al D oa— qg) s.. «« �) 7 6 S 1 4 3 2 ► w (40) a , ' Zb� �(►tl 1 a as) o .�> = in, lur' r•..o. . w ( +) is Ifs �•' �i1 �) (�/) 3 1 • a4.lr•ct (") (S4) ') 1'Y..f ` IO U 12 a K 6 t6 17 1 I=. »� "�:. CITY OPEN SPACE :.rN.:: Lw Iso• rw.sr . • - . /•) i 6 2 tW6 , v 1, i �, z E. 1 C A M O i .eww. � AV E. � • i ce � 7 � i ^ Y ,f (ff)� : 110.0' s • • • • -0 '«' 1 �N) . ^ 1 + 1 s (•_ ?: 1 (•1) c••J � ('y (W c1.) Ry GIJ (•J � '� •)17 •.�s.. .I.sf : 14 N) • u`•) -8 -+ 7 6 S 4 3 2 ! _ D 13 0 10 ;e, 101 • 0 4j do)) Ur) �1) •1 s w� la nl) s 00 11 e 13 14 LS 16 17 W z !H 9 12 � 1 , Ic !•4) •sf..c' 1 ) : l0 ��) (••) v •O. L. jk (t+) �•) 0 (s•) (14 (sq As) S' (�) Ip Y u i4 . s rwct, s lee.o too 11, - - - - - - _ .� ,"••,'`... toMf. ss:T SAK11sMT Te riwntw•e0 i•a�lei�iso • 11 -•s.o AN •h �./.•.+•� 4•.et v I 1 • 1'H. I.s 261 s _ 1 (s) •. • ) 1 ; ` _ ?j 1 9 1 AV E. PO� LAT SITE : MONTANA (�) s , ap �' 1 r: « ac PROPOSED P (�) 111 r 1 e V• :c %s ^ «I 1• SEYL N �(1!) +c y OAK ! O O • 1 �2) R �•b i C ! a GRCI F Fag 44 /M� hs t30) " tj�, 14 , 7 t 2 A n Tt rs" a ) w) s r Z 1 �I 1tZ (_ ) S P� ,x�� 41 < 4 3 �I ,��' /1 (, , s c s - WETLANDS �O o �- A•Y E r (17) `co. a) ¢ _S'� � rt�a + It r < 1Q OUT L OT Z (�) \ s a.• ... ` 9 N� 7! •. G 3 W " pe► 0 , i I ( (Id ) t 16 (1y t P s .r1 M N at (77 •� f•�t• (IS) (N) • c7�) p F- w � 2 2 it) .0 ., • 3 3 (fu (w t ) A LP 4 I 14 y Pow: s Sb 3 v 3R >? e e Ov N t 1, PROPERTY LINE MAP 4 4 N Attachment 3 + � I �3 I ED�A ^l C\/ r��r cc ' , f�uL.l.. I vr\r.�, �, I N 1 5 u u �. a — — — — -- — — — — — -- — — — -- H0 - , T « � 1 — — — — _ �•;; _sa9=s�'_ — — — % • ..r U. a V• a » N/[ ,,•� 1290.29 _ ,- , h i h r ,, � w[ T ' � 'i ii ( � �� � r 06 , i ""'" ' I t ,�► f l jZ r 4 � _ • = r� R 3 , ' �" . \ wC T LINOS , I o 1 1 �sl.r► '� •8 / 2 /' . \ \ AL 14 r / I � � F < - , L sti.s•, r ; r r i irk _ JIL 9" wa N. r / i 1 ♦ i + Z i , f� 9! �ktitr j ! pr (`b 1V " +s � s•r *� s `s_ { ` ' f r AL PROPOSED FINAL PLAT 0 4 N OAK RIDGE ESTATES 4TH ADDITION tip AL f ' ' , 1KT LANDS \ „r•t7riilr , \ % AL Wboow •oot tsum ao .oaT�ow - - JAL ! r •'11 _ _ AIL ::C uvurr \ / awn wi all r� �. .• • Den t 1/p "14 14 1nch ton p1w momort Pound and loved w4h YiTnowto lkonM Mo. 23W al M b q b too " M W"" wwwl•* Jy No monurnsnt 0~ Shotm at M statute ed tereibn k4votw o Mat mobwnont Mot .tl M set. aed rnlcn •ewr %660" adJ*YtMg lot bw% and NkM 10 /wt M ~ Wsas t.Y.errl•* 00 tw tw r0 t t— *#-war Mfw od awr an Mh Met. IN In Woo* wltAN t yq of rocordtna lhk W for tn* of Ws f the Mot the norm lb" of the pvyoa.� Sou9+*o•t Ouartar o Nortlwwt Ouart*r of S*e��1pnn 24. Townshlo 29. Rang* 22 M assumed to boor S W'57'1T' L DNtonce• Shown wftntn th* lot• are dbtancee of the lot 1WwM *Rd not d. or to. eowrwnt I%" wales wNi*rri" shoo., RIX Kuval•ta. Ltd. SHEET 2 OF 2 SiUTS PROPOSED FINAL PLAT 0 4 N OAK RIDGE ESTATES 4TH ADDITION Attachment 4 J 0 of op m ` 1 j • � H � ` N r • • • Q • •rte•._,•_ - _••....�•_-w _ � C O - W - 1— _ 1- .i•• - -• ►.- •.,..•..... ,,,, •mil .� it �,� ' -•� , to �...... � • \. � o _ o /, . r h• �•� W J Al tD ' L doom. ;....: L ' - � ` - .. � t { ?� �' �!� O H• Z to N. Lu W�ti�c \ tz . . . W O • O l ..._.._.._•......._.._... \ I 1 1 '• m a 0 PHA 2 ' STERLING STREET -- � ••-"' \ � � • r• •did � 1 •• ,w PHASE 3 -�, ... M w ''• '\ WETLAND MITIGATION � r �Ir+tARY COURT ix t \• .. _._ AREA #t 1 Cn lu ul 0. : ... :r . .. V'' r \d : •.::• •• •:::: \ O ETLAND o • - Z WE MITIGATION .-PIPELINE pip ^ • , s= •� _ • •, AREA #2 • Y+r, - J j • C? t S c� • • • ;� c.� O ASt: I 4w ••_..� _�G . __- ---.. • - - •- - I Co -4. Cn I • 1 iI ' • i • ' M - Y. N. N -� , jF ' , • 1 = • OAK RIDGE PRELIMINARY PLAT -6 Attachment 5 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7.00 P.M. Monday, May 13, 1996 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 96 -09 6. Oak Ridge Estates Preliminary Plat Time Extension Approved a one -year time- extension for Phases 2 -4 of the Oak Ridge Estates preliminary plat. This time extension is subject to the February 8, 1993 conditions revised as follows (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions): 1. Have the City Engineer approve the final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include the grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree and street plans. These plans shall meet the following conditions: (a) The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, 5 -13 -96 10 7 (b) The developer shall. only grade the land that the. City Engineer determines is needed to construct streets, u t i l i t i e s , sedimentation b mitigation areas or rough grading of steep slopes. ( c) The City E En i must -a PP rove the final tree plan before anyone starts to grade the site. Cdr Sedimentation basi ns , shat l provide 0.10 acre-feet of storage above normal elevation for each tributary acre, based on the Maplewood Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. If slopes are steeper than 10 horizontal to 1 vertical, the developer shall fence the sedimentation basin. The developer shall plant evergree trees around the sedimentation basin. To rovide room for storing sediment, the developer shall excavate t e sedimentation basins to four feet below normal water elevation. Sedimentation basins shall be a part of outlots dedicated to the City. 2. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: (a) Complete all public improvements and meet City requirements.. (b) Place temporary fencing and signs at the grading line shown on the grading pl (c) Construct the following eight-foot-wide bituminous walkways at the same time as the developer builds the adjacent streets: 1> On Sheet One of the plat: between Lots 6 and 7, 19 and 20, and 13 and 14. 2) On Sheet Two of the plat: between Lots 75 and 76, 54 and 55, 67 and 68 and on the pipeline between Lots 54 a 68. The developer may build a wooden observation deck at the end of the trail between Lots 19 and 20. (d) Have NSP install the street lights shown .on the preliminary plat. (e) Before constructing utilities, televise and inspect the existing trunk sanitary sewer within the plat. The developer shall make any repairs that the City Engineer requires. The City shall pay the developer to inspect and repair this sewer. (f) Allow the City access to abandon the existing sanitary sewer manhole f #31) in the wetland in Outlot B. (g) Replace all fine alluvial soils (soils other than sand or gravel) with sand within the two feet under the bottom of the aggregate base of the street. (h) Install perforated drains in sand subcuts at each catch basin lead crossing. M Before the City approves a final plat, the City will decide whether to abandon and replace the 16 -inch water main from Lot 84 to the railroad. �6111 5 -13 -96 (j) Construct a new stormwater outlet from the Outlot 6 pond through a culvert crossing the petroleum pipelines to the proposed wetland mitigation area. From the east end of the mitigation area, build a 24-inch-diameter stormwater pi pe through the park into the Outlot C wetland. (The stormwater outlet from Outlot B is nonfunctional.) (k) Construct a storm sewer between Lots 10 and 14 and Lots 9 and 15 around the wetland to the Arlington Avenue storm sewer. {1) Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer strips.. These signs shall mark the. edge of the buffer strips and state that there shall be no mowing, vegetation cuttingo filling or dumping of lawn waste. (m) Before the City Council approves a final plat for Phase Two the City shall decide whether to require that the developer insert a plastic pipe in the top of both of the existing outlet pipes for Outlot C under the railroad tracks. (n) - Pay the City for the cost of directional signs and no parking signs on one side of the streets. (o) Clean the junk and tires out of the wetlands. (p) The developer's engineer shall provide the City Engineer with digital copies of the final plat and as-built construction plans in .DXF format or as AutoCad Release 12 or 13 drawing files. (q) The developer shall cooperate with private utility companies to coordinate the installation of utility conduit for all future street crossings. 3. Make the following changes on plat and related plans: (a) Move the proposed sedimentation basin between Lots 111 and 113 so it fronts on a street or connect this area with a pipe to the sedimentation basin between Lots 94 and 95. (b) Show a utility easement on Lot 1,16. This easement should extend fifteen feet west from the water main. (c) Cul-de-sac bulbs shall have 47 -foot radius curb returns. (d) Show drainage easements around the wetlands that the developer is proposing for stormwater drainage. 40 Record covenants or deed restrictions with the final plat that do the following: (a) Prohibit the construction of a house or its attachments within 100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline or within 20 feet of a wetland boundary. (b) Inform property owners about any pipelines or wetlands on the site and prohibit any mowing, cutting, filling or dumping,. including yard waste, on the wetland or on a ten -foot buffer strip around the wetland. The Director of Community Development may reduce the buffer zone for lots with an unusual hardship. The Director shall notify the City Council of any reductions and allow them fifteen days to appeal the decision. 9 5 -13 -96 5. Deed Outlots A, 6, C, D and E according to the phasing of the plat. The developer shall have the right to complete the wet -land mitigation that is shown on the outlots. 6. If the City decides to by the "future City Park" in Outlot B and has not paid the developer for the park before recording the plat, the City will sign an agreement to do so. If the City decides not to buy the park, the developer shall show the park as an outlot for future platting or apply for .a new preliminary plat. Ifi the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the Director of Community Development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. 10 Agenda Item G9 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review —First Evangelical Free Church LOCATION: 2696 Hazelwood Street DATE: September 10, 1998 INTRODUCTION Action by Council: Endorsed..... Modiff ems,_„_,__ Rejected....,... Date The conditional use permit (CUP) for First Evangelical Free Church is due for review. The CUP allowed a .church and day care center. Refer to the maps on pages 3 and 5. BACKGROUND ,August 13, 1990: The city council approved a change to the planned unit development (PUD) at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. The change was to convert the former Health Resources building to a church and day care center. August 12,1991: The council reviewed the CUP and decided to review this permit again when the church had plans for their new sanctuary. October 12, 1992: The council approved a change to the PUD and approved the church's construction and landscape plans for a new sanctuary. October 10, 1993: The council reviewed this CUP and requested another review in one year. February 13,1995: The council again reviewed this CUP. They found problems with the bituminous curbing and insufficient landscaping. The council tabled their review to give the church time to revise their plans and to apply for a CUP revision to expand the parking lot. Because of this, the council asked to review the permit again on July 10, 1995. July 10, 1995: The city council reviewed the CUP for First Evangelical Free Church. The church was proposing to expand their parking lot. The main concern was the need for additional landscaping for code compliance along the south lot line to screen the parking lot from the neighbors. July 24, 1995: The city council approved the CUP revision and approved a revised site plan subject to twelve conditions. November 13,1995: The city council reviewed the CUP and required review again in July, 1998 to check on the status of the parking lot expansion, removal of the bituminous curbing and the installation of additional landscape screens. DISCUSSION Staff has delayed review of this CUP review since the applicant was in the process of completing the remaining parking lot and landscaping work in the expanded parking lot. They have now completed all of the required work. The church and grounds look very attractive. There is no reason for further reviews of this CUP. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit for First Evangelical Free Church at 2696 Hazelwood Street only if a problem arises. p:sec311 stevan.cup Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property UnefZoning Map 3. Site plan 2 Attachment 1 IGMS , 61 65 •i • ••t •�'•�'•,•• �,• •. ' •• ••� •1 ,v 0 0 •• • •, •• 0 q %F • COUNTY ROAD 0. 0% *0 0 • • • 1 •� • •.• • • • • • • • RD. D . 2. 3' � o 1. SUMMIT CT. 2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR. 3. DULLITH CT. 4. LYDIA ST. BEAM 00 W Z . W x, s 8 0 • 19 w LYDIA cL Y O Z N W 3 z S v W 37' W k ai 0 Y O o 0 S AVE. BEAM Q� 19 Y o RITZ Cr O oC wit AV • W Mori hom RAMSEY •• W Pond COUNTY 'ti • If COURT m v KOHLMAN a KOHLMAN AVE Lokt W AVE. o W W �3 3 i 3 Z3 • ROAD c V S ' •• :3 �► Cr. V in . �. Z EHILL RD. ; •. EDG r ' •' AVE. cv DEMONT AVE. 2. -14 .� CD W • GERVAIS AVE• 60p O� C OP E BROOKS AVE. Vi BROOKS �� % • AVE. � EL � aTii `; S LGERVAIS IX TAINT s« r av o AVE � er+� !' S � °� *_ j CER1ll1l5 GERVI►tS AVE. z CT. ' GtiANOVIEW AVE. W �,• VIKING OR. Y CASTLE A� a SHERREN AVE. Cti5'R.F Ate' od Lake COPE AVE. AVE NONNI LOCATION MAP 3 �U 1 4 Attachment 2 02� .Go a►.c. • �. �' VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD PONONG AREA 00 �� j • .92 c )2767 a • 2`759 0 e 131'T TI ' , 1 f .71 =R mom am* :W do AAA 060 o 2747 3 �•�•�s•'' %s•, 2730 .5s" ? • 2737 � ....... ...................... ............... ....... ............. ..,...... 2731. • . ............. ........... ... ........ ...............,.. ......... ................... • . . J .•. . .. ... ..... . . . . (4) 2727 rte.. :......., .... .... ... O • • • . • • .... • .. • • •...... • . • • • •• • • • • . .. • • . • • . • • • . . ....... ... .............. ........................ ...... .... .............. ......................... ........... .... ............ 0 ......... •,.... . .... ....................... ........... .. .................... ............................ ....... ........................ 5 ' .. . . ,........... .... ...... .................... .......... ..... ............ ......................... ........... ..... ............ .......................... ............ .... ......... . ........................ ........... .. ........... ........................... ........... ...: ........... ......................... ........... .... .......... .......................... .......... .... ...:...... ......................... :.:...�:..::.. •:.•.� WANGELICAL o U , .::.:.:.�: FI E :......:::. 2707 O N .... ....... :. : ::...:::.. N a :..........• .:.. .... ................ .... .... ........... .. FREE CHURCH.. .. ........::.... . .. .. ..:............ ............ ........ ................. . ........:.. ............ ............................. . . .................::............ .......................... .......... ............ ......................... .............................. .......................... ...... ......................... .......................... ......... ...................... . ......................... .... ...................... 180 2107 ............................. . ......................... ...... ...................... ......................... .. ...:................... :.............. .............. ........................... ........ ........... ........ ................. . .......... ............ ............. ............. " 2673 . .. ............................; . ......................... (20) 4w 4M .......................... ............................... N ........................... .......................... . . ...............,.......... ........................... .......... ...........:..... • - - - �L 681 - ' � ° ' � .2682 C 2680 . • N 04 z s 2675 1° p 61 s ' 8 0 2672 a � (18 )10 �•� S 22 , 3 . L N 2669 A �' (41 2666 s .'JG � • � Oho (� • .o .2661 • ° �- 3 s ,•� i2 �� t 66 �r 67.13 7 2645 (2 W _ • ��� 13 265 85 s 3 519. mum PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP R -1 s Single Family Residential � Planned Unit Development R -2 =Double Dwelling F = Farm Residential Church Project IL 4 Attachment 3 I F P ROPOS ED PARKING LOT EXPANSI ARE L oll "Mal � o ......... 'r'''''' rn t ::::~'.. Z :.: ...... .......... ............. .. ........... t.. is � :;::rr c:c::�:�:�:; :•:•: o 'ter :.# :..:......:•::•: ... .. ...... . .... ...... ...... ......... .......... . r v is �. MLA r F Q Q IL I ..,.1'. � .. ♦ ' j fie s r� • SITE PLAN Q 5 s- zy- 9s N Agenda Item G 10 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Temporary Household Hazardous Waste Collection Site LOCATION: North Side of Aldrich Arena, west of Van .Dyke Street DATE: September 10, 1998.c b co INTRODUCTION Request Endorsed -_ modified,...,- .�..�...._ Date The Saint Paul - Ramsey County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Section, is requesting a change to the conditional use permit (CUP) for operating their temporary household hazardous waste collection site. The site is on the north side of Aldrich Arena, west of Van Dyke Street. (See the maps on pages 4-6.) They want to extend the CUP for another eve years. (See the County's letter on pages 7 and 8.) Description of the Site The site would be open Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays for eight weekends in the spring and for eight weekends in the fall. The County installed a concrete slab and has a 16 -foot -tall canopy they put over the slab. The slab will contain any spills. BACKGROUND On May 11, 1992, the City Council approved a conditional use permit for this facility, subject to eleven conditions. On May 28, 1992, the City Council approved a request for temporary signs for this facility, subject to six conditions. On June 28, 1993, the City Council reviewed this conditional use permit, but took no action on the permit. On December 31, 1993, the conditional use permit ended. On March 28, 1994, th city council approved another conditional use permit for this facility, subject to 11 conditions. (See th council minutes starting on page 9.) DISCUSSION The conditional use permit is scheduled to end on December 31, 1998. The county is asking for a 5 -year time extension to keep the site open. They are not asking for any other changes to the site or to the site operation. We are not aware of any problems with this operation and do not see any problems with the proposed time extension. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on pages 12 and 13. This resolution approves a revision for the conditional use permit for a temporary household hazardous waste collection site. The permit is subject to .the following conditions: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions to the . permit.) 1. All construction shall follow the site approve m pan, dated February 10, 1992. The City ouncil pp major changes after the hold a tY may men Y public hearing. The Director of Community p t may approve minor changes. Y Development 2. The hours of public operation p shall be from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Thursda s a 10 a.m. to 5 P.M. on Saturdays. Y nd Fridays and 3. This collection site shall only e open ' Y p for eight weekends in the sprin summer ' weekends in the summer — fall. g and eight 4. There shall be an emergency response coordinator on the site during all operating hours. 5. The operator shall remove the canopy on each Saturday night after a weekend operation. 6. The County shall mark the traffic lanes to the site from the intersection of Van Dyke Street and Ripley Avenue. 7. Trained household hazardous waste technicians flamma may combine gasoline and othe flammable liquids into a 55- gallon closed -head d r rum. The operator shall surround the drum with a material that will absorb any spills. The operator shall la p ce the drum on heavy plastic sheeting. The plastic shall cover the absorbent material so that the lastic operator p will act as a basin to contain any spills. Theo p shall surround the plastic with orange traffic The operator shall keep the drum at least twenty g is cones. Th and ground the drum. Waste Y eet from any source of ignition, e containers from the public shall not be opened ' except to allow the operator. to inspect the co p on the site, p contents inside. The site operator shall lac ers in leak -proof plastic tubs. Theo operator shall place waste contain ' p all remove the containers from the tubs and pack the containers in drums or plastic bins. The operator shall drums or bins into a truck for trans o place the p rt The Minnesota Department of Trans o approve the truck to haul hazardous waste. The p rtation must collected from the site at the end of each day. operator shall remove the materials 8. The operator or County shall notify he fire department and the emergency .director w Y i when the site will be in operation. preparedness 9. The City Council shall not review this permit unless there is a problem. 10. This permit shall end on December 31, 003 X99,8. The City Council may change this condition if the County requests an extension before December 31 2003. 11. People may pick up latex paint and other waste materials approved by the Director of Community Development. 2 kr /Sec 14:memo99c -2 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. 9 -2 -98 letter from Zack Hansen 5: 3- 28794 City Council minutes 6. CUP Resolution 3 Attachment 1 KOHLMAN AVE. v �.+ KOHLMAN Casey S Z � � Lake AVE. � g > r _ ' El �n Z Z -,� � 2 o t5 ` a EDGEHiIl RD. c DEMONT AVE. Ir A 04 BROOKS AVE. �" BROOKS Q, cn h - P AVE. EL Ey � o SEX TANT Z fors A AV E. a Ssosar�� VE • � Po�ic P�' '•." s AVE. >- g RVAIS GERVAIS W d GE � GRANDVIEW AVE. CT. Z � vl KING DR. �- SHERREN AVE. Kn c� a t ad Lake CASTLE AVE. �p COPES AVE. COPE AVE. W c.5 AVE. �n LARK d AVE. a rA X: �n z LAURIE RD. D. (n v LAURIE RD. s�rr.nroodo LAURIE ° RD. W ca Z 0 9 Pork g J W x 1 SAND URST AVE. Z _ W Z W W Z N JE. B co. R D. e vftc C r_ BURKE AVE. o BURKE AVE. cc� 0 » AVE. �G ELDR IDGE AVE. 3 LN mo o• .��o :. eEI.MONT .AVE. � G AV E. o�ewo Cuy MoN SKILL MAN AVE. HARRIS AVE. ROSEWOOD AVE. N. Robtgood ROSEWJD V Parrs R AN AV. 41 Q� AVE. S. RAMSEY COUNTY N( �� NURSING NpA�lE AND n c �' �a� FAIR GROUNDS g W i n - AYE. DRiCH HOLLOWAY ALDRICN , �• QO v t; CO A W QP 1 U MER AV F- v SU �R VE ARENA ot AVE. F"d Z aooertc� • V) X: Pork X z R i 7- o ' PLEY AVE a W ? G Wok eld Ir f Q= Sw 15 >- ,o O Lake o m KINGSTON AVE. S0 HIA AVE 6� Y W N PRICE AVE. N W PRICE by - o v C7 C9 _ J w Q a. a: LOCATION MAP 4 4 N RI PLEY D � � W � Z w O m = v � 4 N Attachment 2 Ivl 1 RA M S E Y COUN7 NURSING HOME r, 4 W w 0 RAMSEy COON I Colo PROJECT LOCATION Ira. 50 a.e. . RAMSEY COU T ALDRICH ARENA Q< 0 i � N i w GOLF COURSE i O 4 t -t 1851 f � d N t tsaa•� � t7 ' s PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 5 Igo SO Q N � RIPLEY AVE�� mml�i SCALE: 1"=601 I TO ALDRICH ARENA 189 CONCRETE PAVEMENT CANOPY 110 1 -4 J. to VAN DYKE STREET Paw I TEMPORARY HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION FACILITY NURSING HOME SITE Ww=y couN7v SITE PLAN C+ C+ ,WE Attachment 4 Saint Paul - Ramsey County Department of Public Health Rob Fulton, Director w�nns� courrtv September 2, 1998 Mr. Ken Roberts City of Maplewood Office of Community Development 1830 E. County Rd. B Maplewood, MN. 55109 Environmental Health Section 1670 Beam Avenue Suite A Maplewood, MN 55109 -1176 612- 773 -4444 Fax: 612- 773 -4454 . Ow L r SEP f 4 1998 T B Dear Mr. Roberts: The Saint Paul - Ramsey County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Section, is hereby submitting a request to extend for another eve (5) years our Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate a household hazardous waste (HHW) collection site in the parking lot of Aldrich Arena in Maplewood. The current permit is due to expire on December 31, 1998. Aside from requesting a new permit term (through December 31, 2003), no other permit changes are sought. BACKGROUND Under State law, metropolitan counties are required to provide for collection of HHW. Beginning in September of 1991 Ramsey County offered year -round HHW collection through a contract with Dynex Industries in Mounds View. Starting in 1992, seasonal satellite collection sites were added to make the HHW program more convenient to residents. The first of these seasonal sites was the Maplewood site, which was located in the parking lot just north of Aldrich Arena, and which began service in June and July of 1992. The site has offered HHW collection during at least one month each year since 1992. It has been open for 96 days and served 10,862 households, resulting in the removal and proper management of approximately 510,824 p ounds of HHW from residences. The Maplewood seasonal HHW collection site is one of five such sites in Ramsey County. The other sites are located in Roseville, Saint Paul (on the West Side and at the Pleasant Avenue Ice Arena), and White Bear Lake. In 1997 the County also added a second year -round HHW collection site at the Ramsey County Recycling Center on Rice Street in Saint Paul. In late 1997 several Dynex programs -- including HHW --were acquired by Superior Special Services of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin. This change has not affected the HHW program, as Ramsey Count continues to contract with Superior for HHW site operation. REQUESTED CHANGES TO THE CUP The Environmental Health Section is requesting that condition #10 —the term of the permit (currently five years) —be changed to state that the permit shall end on December 31, 2003. The site has operated in compliance of permit conditions and without incident for eight years, and the County intends to provide HHW collection services to residents for the foreseeable future. 7 A t J printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 20% post - consumer content Mr. Ken Roberts September 2, 1998 Page Two Thank you for your consideration of this request for extension. If there are any questions, please contact Joe Wozniak at (651) 773 -4442. Sincerely, Zack Hansen Manager, Environmental Health Section cc: Cathi Lyman -Onkka Norm S chiferl Jolly Mangine E', Attachment 5 b. Councilmember Allenspach moved to table until April 1.1,.1994. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -.all 2. 7:15 P.M. (7:11 P.M.): Conditional Use Permit: Van Dyke Street (Temporary Household Waste Collection Site a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the conditions under which Ramsey County will operate their Temporary Household Waste Collection Site on Van Dyke Street. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. .c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Jack Frost presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Joe Wozniak and Norm Schiferl, representing Ramsey County f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Koppen introduced the following and moved its adoption: 93 -04 -35 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ramsey County is requesting a change in a conditional use permit to operate a temporary household hazardous waste collection site. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the site that is southeast of the Ramsey County Nursing Home. The legal description is: Subject to avenues and easements and except the West 620 feet of the North 438 feet, the West 810 feet of the North one -half of the SW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. on December 31, 1993, the previous conditional use permit expired. 2. On March 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this permit. 3. On March 28, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. r NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve a new conditional use permit for the above - described facility, because: 9 3 -28 -94 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run - off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks, 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design, 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan, dated February 9, 1994. The C i t y Council may approve major changes after they hold a public hearing.. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The hours of public operation shall be no more than from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Thursdays and Fridays and 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays. 3. This collection site shall only be open for up to eight weekends in the spring /summer and up to eight weekends in the summer /fall. 4. There shall be an emergency response coordinator on the site during all operating hours. 5. The operator shall remove the canopy on each Saturday night after a weekend operation. 6. The County shall mark the traffic lanes to the site from the intersection of Van Dyke Street and Ripley Avenue. 7. Trained household hazardous waste technicians may combine gasoline and other flammable l i q u i d s into a 55- gallon closed- head drum. The operator shall surround the drum with a material that will absorb any spills. The operator shall place the drum 10 3 -28 -94 on heavy plastic sheeting. The plastic shall cover the absorbent material so that the plastic will act as a basin to contain any spills. The operator shall surround the plastic with orange traffic cones. The operator shall keep the drum at least twenty feet from any source of ignition, and ground the drum. Household hazardous waste containers from the public shall not be opened on the site, except to allow the operator to inspect the contents inside. The site operator shall place household hazardous waste containers in leak -proof plastic tubs* The operator shall remove the containers from the tubs and pack the containers in drums or plastic bins. The operator shall place the drums or bins into a truck for transport. The Minnesota Department of Transportation must approve the truck to haul hazardous waste. The operator shall remove the materials collected from the site at the end of each day. 8. The opera cor or County shall notify the fire department and the emergency preparedness director when the site will be in operation. 9. The City Council shall not review this permit unless there is a problem. 10. This permit shall end on December 31, 1998. The City Council may change this condition if the County requests an extension before December 31, 1998. 11. People may pick up useable latex paint for reuse, and other waste materials approved by the Director of Community Development, Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all h. Council member Koppen moved to_ approve the temporary sign with the following conditions, 1. The signs shall only be up on the days that the collection facility is open. However, the informational sign may be up during the week the site is open. 2. The signs shall not be within the sight triangle that is described in Section 29 -136 of the City Code. 3. The signs shall be far enough from driveways so the signs w i l l not obstruct drivers' visibility. 4. The signs shall be at least six feet from the edge of the street or at least two feet to a sidewalk. This requirement shall not apply to the signs on van Dyke Street. 5. The signs shall not exceed eight square feet. 6. The County shall place the signs as shown on the February 9, 1994, specifications for HHW Facility Signs, including the site plan. The City Council may approve major changes in this plan. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Counci lmember Rossbach Ayes - all 11 3 -28 -94 Attachment 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ramsey County is requesting a revision for their conditional use permit for a temporary household hazardous waste collection site. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the site that is southeast of the Ramsey Nursing Home. The legal description is: Subject to avenues and easements and except the West 620 feet of the North 438 feet, the West 810 feet of the North one -half of the SW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the history of the permit is as follows: 1. On March 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the original permit. 2 On March 28, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described permit revision with the conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan, dated February 10, 1992. The City Council ma approve mayor changes after they hold a public hearing. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The hours of public operation shall be from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Thursdays and Fridays and 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays. 3. This collection site shall only be Open for eight weekends in the spring — summer and eight weekends in the summer —fall. 4. There shall be an emergency response coordinator on the site during all operating hours. 5. The operator shall remove the canopy on each Saturday night after a weekend operation. 6. The County shall mark the traffic lanes to the site from the intersection of Van Dyke Street and Ripley Avenue. 7. Trained household hazardous waste technicians may combine gasoline and other flammable liquids into a 55- gallon closed -head drum. The operator shall surround the drum with a material that will absorb any spills. The operator shall place the drum on heavy plastic sheeting. The plastic shall cover the absorbent material so that the plastic will act as a basin to contain any spills. The operator shall surround the plastic with orange traffic cones. The operator shall keep the drum at least twenty feet from any source of ignition, and ground the drum. Waste containers from the public shall not be opened on the site, 12 except to allow the operator to inspect the contents inside. The site operator shall place waste containers in leak -proof plastic tubs. The operator shall remove the containers from the tubs and pack the containers in drums or plastic .bins. The operator shall place the drums or bins into a truck for transport. The Minnesota Department of Transportation must approve the truck to haul hazardous waste. The operator shall remove the materials . collected from the site at the end of each day. 8. The operator or County shall notify the ire department and the emergency preparedness director when the site will be in operation. 9. The City Council shall not review this permit unless there is a problem. 10. This permit shall end on December 31, 2003. The City Council may change this condition if the County requests an extension before December 31, 2003. 11. People may pick up latex paint and other waste materials approved by the Director of Community Development The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 1998. 13 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Gladstone Meadows LOCATION: Ide Street, north of Frost Avenue DATE: September 16, 1998 INTRODUCTION Project Description T Agenda item Action by Council: Endorsed.... Modified,_,,,,,,,_,,, _ Red ected___,.____„_ Date Mr. Mike Ackerman is proposing to develop five small -lot (R -1 S) parcels for single dwellings. He 9 9 is calling this development Gladstone Meadows. It would be on a 1.03-acre site on the west side of. Ide Street, north of Frost Avenue. Refer to the maps on pages 8 -12. Requests To build this project, Mr. Ackerman is requesting that the city approve a: 1. Change to the comprehensive plan. This would be from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1 S (small -lot single dwellings) for the site. (See the existing and proposed land use maps on pages 10 and 11.) 2. Change to the zoning map. This would be from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1S (small -lot single dwellings) for the site. Refer to the property line /zoning map on page 9. 3. Street right -of -way vacation. This would be for part of the unused Curve Street right-of-wa g Y on the north side of the site and on the south side of the former railroad .tracks. See the maps on pages 12 and 13.) 4. Preliminary plat for five small -lot single family lots. (See the maps on pages 12 and 13.) DISCUSSION Land Use Plan and Zoning Map Changes To build the proposed plat, Mr. Ackerman wants the city to change the land use plan and zoning map for the site. These changes would be from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1 S (small -lot single dwellings), (See the existing land use plan map on page 10 and the proposed land use plan map on page 11.) The city intends R -1S areas for small -lot (7,500 square -foot) single dwellings. For LBC areas, the city plans for offices, clinics or day care centers. Land use plan changes do not require specific findings for approval. Any change, however, should be consistent ' t with the city's land use goals and policies. There are several goals in the Comprehensive Plan that apply to this request. They include: • Provide for orderly development. • Minimize conflicts between land uses. • Provide a wide variety of housing types. • Whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar uses front on the same street or at borders of areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers. Include a variety of housing types for all residents ... including apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single - family housing, public- assisted housing, low- and moderate - income housing, and rental and owner- occupied housing. • Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic, social or physical impact on adjoining developments. • The city coordinates land use changes with the character of each neighborhood. • Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. An advantage of this proposal is that an area that the city once thought would be good for commercial development would become residential. This is especially beneficial to the existing residential properties on the east side of Ide Street. The proposed change would expand the residential uses on a street that is now primarily used by the existing homes on the east side of the street. Thus, the proposal meets the goals in the comprehensive plan by having similar uses fronting on the same street. Street right -of -way Vacation Mr. Ackerman asked the city to vacate the Curve Street right -of -way on the north end of the site. The right -of -way, if the city vacates it, would then become part of the proposed Lot 5. However, for the city to vacate a right -of -way, the council must find that it is in the public interest and that there is no public interest in keeping the right -of -way. While reviewing this request, the city engineer noted that city crews dump snow from streets in the area east of Clarence Street, south of the DNR trail and north of this site. The dumping area includes part of the Curve Street right -of -way west of Ide Street. Because of this public .use, the city engineer wants the city to keep part of the Curve Street right -of -way. (See the map on page 13.) This map shows the part of the right -of -way that is to remain and the part of the right -of -way that the city could vacate. By vacating part of the Curve Street right -of -way, there should be enough additional land area to create Lot 5. If the city does not vacate any of the Curve Street right -of -way, the applicant would have to change the plat to not include the right -of -way and to show.only four lots. Preliminary Plat Density and Lot Size Several neighbors thought that there were too many lots in this plat and that they were too small. As proposed, the five lots range from 8,844 square feet to 9,354 square feet with an average lot size of 8,946 square feet. Maplewood has zoned the east side of Ide Street R -2 (single and double dwellings). The city requires each lot In this zoning district to have at least 60 feet of frontage and have at least 7,500 square feet. The existing house lots on the east side of Ide 2 Street meet or exceed these standards. They each have at least 80 feet of street frontage and range in size from 9,920 to 24,800 square feet. For R -1 S lots, the city requires at least 60 feet of frontage and at least 7,500 square feet of area. All the proposed new lots will meet or exceed the R -1S standards. Maplewood cannot reduce the number of lots if the developer is meetin g ,the city's Ordinances. p Public Utilities There are sanitary sewer and water in Ide Street to serve the proposed lots. The developer will need to extend the water service to the north to serve Lot 5. The Saint Paul Water Utility has approved this plan. Trees There are no large trees on the site. There is an area of trees near the rear of Lots 4 and 5 that will remain. The home builders will be grading each lot as art of the home construction. p ton. Dedications The city engineer is recommending that the developer grade the area at the rear of Lots 1 and 2 to form a low, storm water infiltration area with a french drain. This is to ensure that the storm water will not create a problem for the area. This drainage area requires a drainage easement that the developer will have to show on the final plat. COMMISSION ACTION On. September 1, 1998, the planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed land use plan change, zoning map change, street vacation and preliminary plat. RECOMMENDATIONS A. .Approve the resolution on page 17. This resolution changes the land use plan for the Gladstone Meadows plat on the west side of Ide Street, north of Frost Avenue. This change is from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1S (single dwellings). The city is making this .change because: 1. It would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. 2. This area would eliminate the planned commercial area that would have been between two residential areas. 3. It would be consistent with the proposed zoning and land uses. B. Approve the resolution on page 18. This resolution changes the zoning map for the Gladstone Meadows plat on the west side of Ide Street, north of Frost Avenue. This change is from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1 S (small -lot single dwellings). The reasons for this change are those required by the city code and because the owner plans to develop this part of the property for small -lot single dwellings. 3 C. Approve the resolution on page 19. This resolution vacates part of the unused Curve Street right -of -way that is west of Ide Street and is south of the Ran Avenue ' Y ue right -of -way and south of the former railroad (as shown on the map on page 13), is in the ublic inter right-of-way for the following p interest to vacate this part of the ri g Y Ilowing reasons. 1. The adjacent property has adequate street access. s. i 2. This right -of -way s not needed for the public ur ose of street p p construction. 3. The existing Curve Street right -of -way is too narrow for street construction. This vacation is subject to the city keeping utility easement vacated right -of -way. g ty over the north ten feet of the D. Approve the Gladstone Meadows preliminary plat (received by the city on September 16, 1998). The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat: 1 Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer eloper or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public ' g p p is improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading ' g g ing limits. C. Pay the city for the cost of any traffic- control or street identification ' ication signs. d. Provide all required and necessary easements. e. Cap and seal any wells on site that the owners are not using. g 2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering g ring plans. These plans shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control tree ands street eet plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. • b. The grading plan shall: (1) Include proposed building .pad elevation and contour information for each home site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (2) Include contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. (3) Show a berm lower in height than 6 feet tall (as proposed) and planting screen of evergreen trees on the north side of Lot 5. c. The street and utility plans shall show the: (1) Water service to each lot, including Lot 5. (2) Storm water drainage area and French drain (City Plate Number 315) on the rear of Lots 1 and 2. 4 (3) Removal of the extra street pavement south of the middle of Lot 1 and continue the existing curb to the south line of the plat. 3. Change the plat as follows: a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. c. Label the street as Ide Street on all plans. 4. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including any off -site drainage and utility easements. 5. The developer shall .complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. 6. Record a covenant with the final plat that requires the house and garage on Lot 1 to have at least a 10 -foot side yard setback from the south -side property line. 7. If necessary, obtain a permit from the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District for grading. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. 5 CITIZENS' COMMENTS I surveyed the Owners of the 22 properties within 350 feet of this site. Of the 8 replies, 3 were e for the proposal, 3 objected and 2 had no comment. For 1. I believe new homes in this area will only help to beautify this neighborhood. (Professional Image Inc. -1375 Frost Avenue) 2. Five new single family homes would be a plus for the neighborhood. (Long - Mahtomedi) 3. This is now a recreation area with the trail and not a railroad hub. Let the homes come in to increase the area value. I do hope these will be $125,000 and up homes. (Brake -1991 Clarence Street) Objections 1..Allowing five lots would mean that our "whole neighborhoodis would lose valuable access ( in many ways) to Curve Street. Squeezing in five homes would not be in the "best interest' of our neighborhood or the city. (Grose 1948 Donna Senty Drive) 2. See the comments on pages 15 and 16. REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.06 acres Existing land use: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Apartments across DNR trail South; Oak Street furniture store and parking lot West: Residences on Clarence Street East: Houses across Ide Street PLANNING Existing land Use Plan designation: LBC (limited business commercial) Existing Zoning: LBC (limited business commercial) Proposed Land Use and Zoning: R -1S (small lot single dwellings) Findings for Rezoning Section 36-485 of the zoning code requires that the city council make the following findings to rezone property: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. p:sec 15 \gladmead.mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Land Use Plan (Existing) 40 Land Use Plan (Proposed) 5. Proposed Preliminary Plat dated July 16, 1998 6. Street Vacation Detail Map 7. Applicant's Application Statements 8. Statement of Mastel -1960 Donna Senty Drive 9. 7 -28 -98 letter from Klein -1954 Donna Senty Drive 10. Land Use Plan Change Resolution (LBC to R -1 S) 41. Rezoning Resolution (LBC to R -1 S) 12. Street Right -of -Way Vacation Resolution 13. Project Plans (separate attachment) VA COUNTY ROAD C W zd cc cr, o PPa -M C W, ��MlL 6 1' z a g lz 4J s ° CT w "N ° 'ONh OR Cd�� AVE. � C NOR v e W w �. EDGEHit1 RD. CT. DEMOt AVE. AVE. p v DEMONT AVE, .:t T BROOKS AVE. BROOKS r W ICE BROOKS W w o AVE. Z o U CT. g a''' ANT AVE. �C LC EX TANT AVE. . Z four ti soo Done Pork Z p. <e> �F GERVAIS AVE. >. o W d GERVA I, AVE z z CT. �FR g v GRAN OVI EVY I e cd VIKING DR. • SHERREN AVE. Kv cc ad Lake coPE ate. --1 D LARK w Lu v AVE. r ' LARK 4 AVE. Kelter % Loke o CO. W RD. X v � � TIAVE. r� v� LAURIE RD. sn.nroRIE RD. W 1 W Z Pork �` Ca 1. ELAND RD. 0 C? SAND UR T U. S JUNCTION AVE. a Q Q B Y . RD. B F 00 ° r a e(/ A 0: comet R KE AVE m RKE AVE. c� ® BURKE AVE. cater v (1) CHAMBERS ST 5 C� AVE . 0 ELDR I DG E AVE. ,form �" LN. U RsE cn p,VE. BELMONT AVE. ��• CO GOLF SKILL AN E. ewo city V000 �� SKILL MAN AVE. HARRIS AVE. SHO ROSEWOOD AVE. N. V; J RYAN V Rob3nlw �l ROSEW D D Pork R AN AV. �. AVE. S. RAMS Ate' W NURSING Trod m o �; Q' �� FAIR G FROST o ui J Q AVE. ALDRICH w FE NTON AVE. z y- In w. Z AV Po v S U R A'VE. ARENA W � 3 W U IvtER o � l3 c0 DO ° FRISBIE AVE. mod` RIP LEY z o F W W G Wok eld 7 o SO PH IA t,. o o p Lake -und < �Lake� �� � = v = w Lake I SO HIA AVE W -- cn z � Y J :3 w PRICE ON • � Pholen ° o ° w z w LOCATION MAP �616 4 N -Attad'hi-Alent 2 I t9 r m, iI 14*:t j : 3 X40) ; 0 , 25 4 (ro 0) P 4� Me 10 0 7, z W • 24 4 23 S zz (0 9 18 IV 0 - S I O (152:) 17 EL 6_ c I a PI ii i z3 __j u 41 to . Wo _ - a I 1 0 t Iem - oI w.1 Ioem Pj � 0 4_ A 76 (71)� 3 i\ ( (35. 6c.) (31) If 1 13 14 Is lip 4 17 Iti Is to !� fi � �, aj 10 11 12 t 3 f 4 40-81.18 '76 Ira 30 k1k A 1&t O NAJF'%l LwLm^ivv ispi. 4 wv 60 A 7 2 ? 2 Pi ArWil 0 (76) — 3 ef AP TM 0 0% 4 13 4 4* J CITY PARK 1*,- 12 _ - s X (b W 17W 3T_ ez� to 04 ( ;A F AIL-'. z I z 4 1 r1 m � � e � O ?eZ $.� .�� m W II r Ix 11 9-7 A I (63) 10 Aft 10 10 T., d3 3 so 1+ 14 IV US S F_ (2-) 17 3 301$0 t S ra 0 art IKYAN .158 &C -a 5 r w T.45 0 +464 so ke; '29 Y X. C 2 8 1960 W ' ( r .-30qr.*: 27 No Col > 2 .41 5 �rc 5 le 1970 6- - - z SITE 0 1964 GLADSTONE q 1 _. 2.1960 ��' 1948 w COMMUNITY CENTER z 1; SO v) < - i 0 2 S SCHOOL I� W9 GZt._ I I I 1 0 .2 t 10 to 1940' Z 1942 - L5 3 t , z 1 11 7 0 0 (-7 fit -t 15 l ie 14 1 tA 0 ­1375 1401 �u I R- 2 q 14. 1-7 -B Ir R3.. . 17 5 .1 C7 0 o I ?$ $0! 30 Sff 1-125— ��) . — I I . m FROST' ldoftk ■ �O - *V 0 40 1 FIR it r - co 30 6 0 1914 as Fee- s, 40 FfIII P_ 1 5 A 30 0 ?.6 27 2A as ?C) .29 ��. — W i>Es . 3 28 , ui 3 28 ! e It 0 -_ �-}- �� .i ... � rte. � � s...- 4. 4 2 7 r 22 3 A 2A or y Lu 4 .7 ;24 24 + .• Z � r +. .. ter- � - 23 111 s — 23 --Alm 22 ■ b. ZCL � �. 00 • --- � � (,� —! Z I ____ u __� j It 7 20 MAN 4p- 5 Ira 12. is A 2! / 17 .M PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP SITE 9 Attachment 3 man Ave. - �Iail Aw� 1 R` I NMI i7S P (Park) 0 � S (School) C (Church) 'lamer A.e. E I I - 11 1m � Water BC (Business CoMMeraal) - B (Business Commercial-Modified) LBC ( Business Commercial) 0 R3 (H) (Multiple DAvellings 9, unitstacre) ° s R2 (Single and Double Dwelling) 0013 i P (Park) 0 Ri (Single Dwelling) S (School) C (Church) OS (Open Space) Existing Land Use Plan 10 N Attachment 4 noon Ave. - Am 'ARM rx Summar Ave. E Water BC (Business Commercial) BGM (Business Commercial - Modified) i 2' ABC (Limited Business Corrrrieraal) I■ � LM= nn m R3 (H) (Multiple D&ellin 9.5A6.3 units/acre) R2 (Sin and Double Dwellin P (Park) 8 S (School) C (Church) OS (Open Space) R1S (Sin Dwellin nn m R3 (H) (Multiple D&ellin 9.5A6.3 units/acre) R2 (Sin and Double Dwellin Proposed Land Use Plan N P (Park) R1(Sin DvuEllin S (School) C (Church) OS (Open Space) R1S (Sin Dwellin Proposed Land Use Plan N Attachment 5 ton hike Ackerman 6M oth ate 2 ' N. . 1.. 904. 7 Oakdale UN 55128 �E + , - soy �- ---------- - - - - -- Tel: 779 -4149 �' 6' a► NORTH 0� 5 ` t .903 PROPOSED -Z - O r �GJ �J $g,G -Z� 59 2:1 BERM ice',' r ��• `` ; i • A .0 0A 3 •'N. OF PROP. Llh \. 902 0\ H \ O o1: 1 901 a 03.20 100 4 If r � i�oo.52 \-/ r? O 1-1 91 1902 Ole I • i' 9021-,, I �� 91 I I 901 ' I 19C 1 W I 900 9OP •----- Q 5 N • 1 90 O ) E�� I 8991s - i I I 89.7; 1 i I I 899 -- ------- ---4 -• ve Bituminous from 89p•23 20' of property line •�- 0 �. . . I . ! 1 , i - L 900 I ( 99.60 ,�.'�• Spillway _.. 6 Free Reconstruct turnaround 10 ♦, I w �..w `�� I match future driveway �ROO;7c,; .'• 0 ti V • 1 101 r —' — i t V '- - ---_� - -- 0.51 . J 4 /. 0 0 1 t ,. I ' ter, - ••,i,• , -� •;• Pot 9 1.h ::rYl':''X,':'r� 901.2 �r,. r.• c �• '; � � • i it L . rj O M z z: ;:�: 1 -- - --• -- -- - - -- ---- �' �° "' 0 902 K W I 901. �•, - ( Found 902 47 . — — -• - -- �o mo �:.,�,� =�• ';r��'; -� l 87 I • : _ O + 903 . o Co j ... ;,�► =' ' r o j z .:• + �� 1 3. 03 I _, .�; _ ^ *.!. ��:•; ,;- X903.96 — — — _ — — - 4-' T Found 1d2" I.P. — _ •� ~'• r xst�?!�'- •i No 4.E.70 C1 0) / T A-i . ► ! ;!"�' 1--------------•----- t .v 10 �:; 0.38. . I 902:,, =r 010? ~4:: N• �AjI► I •\ / • � ,`.:. •�!:� �, .) -: Yom' ,. n o ) f E f 1 I lit MACY FENCE ION MIS LINE — — — — — — PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT Gladstone Meadows 12 9 -1&1s 4 N C ` dop e, 14. 0 0 C C i r e , oo \ L Ot '01 Q �1 fill � \gr � o�d rep \�l ��S '� � ,So�< of aor \C c� 40 �► ` `, `♦ 0 A r 61 9 , ,. \ , 0 g , , , - - - G• () 5 3 t t G O 6 0 It 1 �w 1 6 Al s , .0401 + , ♦ "-e f ound\ 1,'?" Iron Pipe 1000 1 � ' PO 44 d1 / O . r e� '�' Iea w TAC 1 do 7-8 -$2 — -- .- --- — — e7 048053"W J . O � • / t � UP- Intersection of the Southeasterly right of way line 10 the East Half of vacated Aliey 10� l h o O � 1 134.01 O C CV1 v — :!5c Pizzo XEe 7-V L / n�JE , 13 4 N UP- Intersection of the Southeasterly right of way line of Curve Street and the west line of the East Half of vacated Aliey 10� 1 134.01 � 9 L3 ...:.r. — — :!5c Pizzo XEe 7-V L / n�JE , �_ -t 0 O 3 O 4 - _ C; 13 4 N Attachment 7 l . The new intended use of the property would be to divide the parcel into 5 residential lots and to construct a single family house with an attached garage on each lot. This use would - be in harmony with the majority of the property surrounding the site in that on both the east and west sides of the property there are existing single family homes. This proposed change in intended use should have only a minimal effect on the sewer and water systems that are already currently in place. In fact, approving such a change in use would assure that there would be no future need for expanded utility service. 2 The new intended use of the property would be to divide the parcel into 5 residential lots and to construct a single family house with an attached garage on each . lot. This use would be in harmony with the majority of the property surrounding the site in that on both the east and west sides of the property there are existing single family homes. a. This change in zoning would promote the public welfare in several ways. Approving a zoning change would remove the uncertainty as to the future use of the property. As currently zoned the parcel could be used for a variety of commercial uses. What ever the commercial. use night be it should be safe to assume that the amount of traffic on Donna Senty would be considerably less if the property were used. in a residential fashion. A residential use of the property would also help to preserve, and possibly increase, the property values of the surrounding homes in the neighborhood. b. This zoning change would not injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood. Rather, it would serve to bring this parcel of land into a use that would conform with and enhance the surrounding neighborhood. c. All of the public facilities such as streets, sewers, water lines, schools, and parks are already currently available and more than adequate to service the property in its new intended use. 1. The reason for requesting the vacation of the Curve Street easement is so that the property can be incorporated into the Gladstone Meadows development to the south. Curve street never was an actual road and never did serve a public transportation need By vacating the street the property will become part of a private'residential lot. The city of Maplewood would have no further responsibility to maintain the property. f PPL /Cf1 NTS � p/�t /c�97J'O/1/ A/ i 5 14 Attachment 8 . have ra Comment. Comment. a I object Mls proposal bsuusa_ � � m.. o ._YMQ. � � �/l � . ly)A6TEL lqvl 0 POAJAM " you object, aoscn w, describe below w� �,, ..�a.v(:).nycn.ox mm would m.ke this .vvncaron.�e n no changes �a m ake It acceptable, na,�.nowa 5F il7t/ Aef � cute the �er u a � awm w, „p„yr� Q e�� 10 �F I!A"' al '40 Use the reverse side K you noid more room. ouz. ee�nn�e� to 4�.�✓ �> RJ2 ir_a�d . �ie. /vor�, 9F `2os�,✓ - <`_' c �t� c.JS�.,d�J � � �/' ..oa.1 z 2 .:J�� s �-u'— 9z°"' " -9 - �,� l cc�-pY • �'"`Oe� ° -L!`'� hcw, ,�,� -e-w �,tu�i� -y vn ��a-�• �, ate, ,am,,t., «,�`. . � our Le 44 Pol Ali en / J�..� 15 -1, Attachment 9 July 28, 1998 Kenneth Roberts - Associate Planner We would like to start by saying my wife and I have no objection to having houses built across from us. We would however like you to take four different points into consideration. • We believe it would be to the city's best interest NOT to vacate Curve Street. Reason being, it would cut off any good access to Ryan Street which is n_ w used for a big snow dump by the city and the drainage -is for that purpose, also you ma want to use that area for future projects with the new ball park at Gladstone Field such as parking, tennis courts like other ball fields seem to have. Also, vacating Curve Street, you would lose any type of connection between the ball field and the future fire station and park being built on the west side of Clarence Street. • We would like to see the lots plotted with two 40 foot lots to match all the city maps, and also the surrounding neighborhood. We don't think five more feet per lot would hurt the builder. It sure would make any fences in the back yard match very nice instead of looking mismatched. • We would hope that the wafter curb would be extended south across the last house to keep the nice appearance of Donna Senty Drive. • Last but not least, we would prefer single level homes on all lots to blend better with the neighborhood. I realize the builder is tying to use the basement fill from the three northern homes to build up the two southern lots to save hauling expense, but walkouts would put the house pretty high up -and not matching the area very well. If you have any question on what my wife and I are, trying to say, please feel free to contact me at my work number 628 - 6386. Thank you for reading this and we hope it has some merit. Sincerely, Mr. &Mrs. Timothy L. Klein 1954 Donna Senty Drive 16 Attachment 10 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mike Ackerman I proposed a change to the city's land use .plan from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1 S (single dwellings -small lot). . WHEREAS, this change applies to Lots 20 -27 and the north 15 feet of Lot 19, Block 11 and the part of the alley accruing thereto in Gladstone Addition, (also known as Lots 1 -5 of the proposed Gladstone Meadows) in Section 15, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County,. Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On September 1, 1998, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing. a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council not approve the plan amendment. 2. On September 28, 1998, the city Council discussed the proposed land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning Commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City council approve the above- described Change for the following reasons: 1. It would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. 2. This, area would eliminate the planned commercial area that would have been between two residential areas. 3. It would be consistent with the proposed zoning and land uses. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 9 1998. 17 Attachment 11 RESOLUTION: ZONING MAP CHANGE WHEREAS, Mike Ackerman proposed a change to the zoning map from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1 S (small lot single dwellings). WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property on the west side of Ide Street, north of Frost Avenue. WHEREAS, the legal description is: . .Lots 20 -27 and the north 15 feet of Lot 19, Block 11 and the part of the alley accruing thereto in Gladstone Addition, (also known as Lots 1 -5 of the proposed Gladstone Meadows ) in Section 15, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On September 1, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the city Council not approve this Change. 2. On September 28, 1998, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. reports an ommen The Council also considered td recdations from the city staff and plannin g . commission. NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described change in the zoning map for the following reasons: 1.. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring .property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, p olice and fire protection and schools. 5. The owner plans to develop this part of the .property for small lot single dwellings. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1998. 18 Attachment 12 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Mike Ackerman applied for the vacation of the following escribed street right- of -way: g g. That part of the Curve Street right -of -way as originally latted and dedicated in GLA p DSTONE Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 25, Block 11, said GLADSTONE and easterly of a line described as beginning. at the intersection of the southeasterly right -of -way line of Curve Street and the west line of the East Half of the 20 -foot vacated alley per document number 1705888 as originally dedicated in said Block 1 . 1, thence northwesterly perpendicular with. the northwesterly right -of -way line of said Curve Street to said northwesterly right -of -way line and said line there endin g in Section 15 Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On September 1, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the city ouncil Y approve this vacation. 2. On September 28, 1998, the city council held a ublic hearing. City staff published a ' ' p g y p notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners. The Council g ave everyone at the hearing a Chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and lannin commission. p g WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: Lots 25, 26 and 27, Block 11, Gladstone Addition in Section 15, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described vacation since it is in the public interest based on the followin g reasons: 1. The adjacent property has adequate street access. 2. This right. of -way is not needed for the public purpose of street construction. 3. Curve Street is too narrow for street construction. This vacation is subject to the city keeping a utility easement over the north ten feet of the vacated right -of -way. The. Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 1998. 19 MINUTES of THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 183.0 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Gladstone Meadows -Donna Senty Drive: Land Use Plan Change (LBC to R -1 S), Zoning Map Change (LBC to R-1 S), Street Right -of -Way Vacation and Preliminary Plat Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts pointed out that, even though surrounding sites. are zoned R-2,. they have developed with single - family homes. Because the applicant does not intend to build duplexes, staff suggested R -1S zoning to allow for a small lot size while ensuring that twin -homes or duplexes would not be built in the future. Commissioner Trippler observed that, as he looked at the map, on the east side "there are three homes that are sitting in the same place as you are going to have five. And on the west side you are going to have two homes sitting in the same location as you are going to have five." He did not think this arrangement fit in very nicely. Mr. Roberts pointed out that the new lots would be only 60- to 66- feet -wide while some of the existing lots are much larger. He asked if this proposal is a reasonable alternative to what the existing land use and zoning would . allow. Commissioner Thompson noted that there was no turnaround at the end of Donna Senty Drive near Lot 5. He envisioned garbage trucks backing down the street and cars turning around in driveways. Ken Haider, city engineer, commented that 120 feet of right -of -way is required for a cul -de -sac and this street only has 60 feet. He said the proposal is to add pavement to the existing area where snowplows, etc. turn around now and continue it on as a driveway into the house on Lot 5. Mr. Haider added that, basically, they will Continue to have what they have today as an area for turnaround. Commissioner Thompson also asked that this proposal be motivation to clean up some of the area to the west. Mr. Roberts said the reason for recommending that Lots 1 -4 be shown as 66- feet -wide and Lot 5 with the remainder of the street frontage is to ensure that Lot 5 had enough lot area. Because of losing part of the right -of -way and not being able to vacate all of it, the lot area of Lot 5 was reduced. Thus, Lots 1-4 each lost four feet. After inspecting the site, Mr. Haider felt there would be adequate elevation on Lot 5 for runoff. Commissioner Frost asked about public access to the Department of Natural Resources trail from Donna Senty Drive. Mr. Roberts said the DNR trail land does not abut the end of Donna Senty Drive. There is a small piece of land in between the trail and the street that is owned by one of the railroads. Because this piece is privately owned, the city probably cannot require a connection to the trail at this site. He said that the city engineer did not think it was prudent, at this time, to vacate the remaining portion of Curve Street north of Lot 5 because of snow storage and other concerns. Ken Roberts said that when the city vacates property it goes back to the land that originally dedicated it. Therefore, if the remaining portion of Curve Street were vacated, the land would go to Mr. Ackerman, the applicant, as part of the original Gladstone Addition for Lot 5. Mr. Roberts indicated he was comfortable that the Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 09 -01 -98 frontage of Lot 5 is adequate to meet the minimum frontage requirements without needing a variance. Mr. Haider addressed the concern of a resident about the excessive noise that is generated near Lot 5. He said the street department plows snow early in the morning, starting at 4 or 5 a.m., but does not haul snow until daytime during the regular shift. Although Mr. Haider could not predict what would happen, he did not foresee this as a problem. Chairperson Fischer then opened the public hearing for comment from the. public. Mike Ackerman of 2053 Flanders Road in North St. Paul, the applicant, said he has tried to make every effort to cooperate with staff in planning this project. Commissioner Trippler asked the applicant if it would be disruptive to change the zoning to R -1 for this parcel and require 80 -foot frontage on the lots. Mr. Ackerman said the different zoning would not work for him. He does not build duplexes or twin homes, only single family houses. Timothy Klein, of 1954 Donna Senty Drive, repeated Mr. Trippler's concerns about shrinking the lot sizes and moving lot lines. He said he was.committed to the appearance of the neighborhood. Mr. Klein disagreed with Mr. Haider and said the snowplows do not turn around at the north end of Donna Sentry Drive because it is not wide enough when they are plowing snow. He said that the plows and garbage trucks frequently back south down the street to the parking lot of Oak Street Furniture near Frost Avenue. Then they turn around and continue down the other side. Mr. Klein acknowledged that he was pleased with staff's easement decision on Curve Street. Mr. Klein had a concern about the 10 -foot illegal right -of -way for the trucks to drive back to Donna Senty and Ryan Street to dump their snow. He wondered if there was any alternative to supplying these homes with sewer, water, and gas other than digging up yards and the new street. Mr. Klein requested that the developer be required to extend the curb across in front of Lot 1 and replace it on Lot 5 where it is widened for a turnaround. Commissioner Rossbach inquired if Mr. Klein would prefer limited commercial development. Mr. Klein said it doesn't really matter, but he would probably prefer neighbors. Commissioner Pearson remarked that even if the land was developed as commercial, disruption of street and yards would still occur. Commissioner Frost inquired about the possibility of having one major utility connection and then have the remaining tee off from that to lessen the disturbance to yards and the street. Mr. Haider said a variation is sometimes allowed when the sewer is extremely deep and the holes to connect would be enormously wide. He didn't think this was the case on this street. Mr. Haider concurred that there would probably be five repair patches in the street if there are five houses. He also agreed that a condition could be included for extension and replacement of the curb. Mr. Haider said it is not practical to allow sewer connections from a manhole so a connection into the pipe will be required. Mr. Ackerman acknowledged that many of Mr. Klein's concerns were legitimate and he had considered them. He intends to continue the curbing and match it to the existing curb. Mr. Ackerman also said a fence will be constructed and a berm of trees planted to separate the residential use from the Oak Street Furniture store at the corner of Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 09 -01 -98 Donna Senty Drive and Frost Avenue. He will also create more of a berm along the north side of Lot 5 and plant trees there. Mr. Ackerman referred to a project he had last year in North Saint Paul that was similar to this. He said the residents there are .pleased with what ended up to be five affordable lots of about 65 -feet each. He proposes to build houses in the $140,000-$180,000 range. Since there were no further comments from the audience, the public hearing portion was closed Mr. Roberts said, in his view, Lot 5 is not a corner lot. Commissioner Trippler was concerned about Lot 5 meeting the 85 -foot- frontage requirement if it is considered a corner lot. Mr. Roberts said, "as far as we know now, the street is not oin to g 9 o g through" to the north of this lot. Mr. Trippler said that to put 60 -or 66 -foot lots in this neighborhood would "throw the whole neighborhood out of whack." He thought, if this land was going to be rezoned, it should be zoned single - family to match the neighborhood. Commissioner Frost pointed out that there are R -2 zones to the east and west and, therefore, this should be rezoned R -2. Mr. Roberts said five single- family homes could be built with the R -2 zoning classification. Mr. Frost said the 10- foot lot width difference between R -1 and R -1S was not really noticeable. Mr. Frost had no problem with the R -1S zoning. Commissioner Thompson said he was still concerned about a cul -de -sac and the traffic pattern that exists. He questioned if allowing four lots would leave enough room for a cul -de -sac so the snow plows and the garbage trucks could turn around. Mr. Haider, city engineer, said there is not enough traffic at this location to warrant the cost of constructing a cul -de -sac. Mr. Roberts said Ryan Street from Manton Street to Donna Senty Drive was vacated when the ballfield near the Gladstone Community Center was constructed last year. Mr. Roberts gave some zoning history of the area. Commissioner Rossbach did not see the traffic on the street or the cul -de -sac as an issue. He also was not concerned about the property lines lining u p or the R -1S zoning. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend A. Approval of the resolution which changes the land use plan for the Gladstone Meadows plat on the west side of Donna Senty Drive, north of Frost Avenue. This change is from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1 S (single dwellings). The city is making this change because: 1. It would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. 2. This area would eliminate the planned commercial area that would have been between two residential areas. 3. It would be consistent with the proposed zoning and land uses. B. Approve the resolution which changes the zoning map for the Gladstone Meadows plat on the west side of Donna Senty Drive, north of Frost Avenue. This change is from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1 S (small -lot single dwellings). The reasons for this change are those required by the city code and Planning Commission Minutes of 09'01 -98 because the owner plans to develop this part of the property for small -lot single dwellings. C. Approve the resolution which vacates part of the unused Curve Street right-of- way that is west of Donna Senty Drive and. is south of the Ryan Avenue right -of- way and south of the former railroad (as shown on the map on page 13). It is in the public interest to vacate this part of the right -of -way for the following reasons: 1. The adjacent property has adequate street access. 2. This right- of -wa.y is not needed for the public purpose of street construction. 3. The existing Curve Street right -of -way is too narrow for street construction. This vacation is subject to the city keeping a utility easement over the north ten feet of the vacated right -of -way. D. Approve the Gladstone Meadows preliminary plat (received by the city on July 16, 1998). The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat: 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Pay the city for the cost of any traffic- control or street identification signs. d. Provide all required and necessary easements. e. Cap and seal any wells on site that the owners are not using. 2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall: (1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (2) Include contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. (3) Show a berm and planting screen of evergreen trees on the north side of Lot 5. Planning Commission -S- Minutes of 09 -01 -98 C. The street and utility plans shall show the: (1) Water service to _each lot, including Lot 5. (2) Storm water drainage area and French drain (City Plate Number 315) on the rear of Lots 4 and 2. (3) Removal of the extra street pavement south of the middle of Lot 1 and continue the existing curb to the south line of the plat. 3. Change the plat as follows: a. Add drainage and utility easements as required b ' q y the city engineer. b. Show drainage and utility easements along ll lat. These e g property lines on the final p easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and re property lines and five feet wide alon g the side property lines. rear C. Show the revised Curve Street vacation and the revised Lot 5. d. Show Lots 1 - 4 at 66 feet wide and Lot 5 with t ' frontage. he remainder of the street 4. Secure and provide all required easements for the e development including any off -site drainage and utility easements. 5. The developer shall complete all radin for public 9 g p c improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the _ developers, agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed plat a royal. p ted before final pp 6. Record a covenant with the final lat that requires p q s the house and garage on Lot 1 to have at least a 10 -foot side yard setback from the s line. outh -side property 7. if necessary, obtain a permit from the Ramsey-Washington r' Metro Watershed District ict for grading. If the developer decides to final plat art of the preliminary • p p urinary plat, the director of community development may waive any conditions that do n plat. of apply to the final *The developer must complete these conditions p e conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes .,_ Fischer, Frost, Ledvina, Mueller, Pearson, Rossbach, Thompson Nays— Trippier The motion passed. Agenda Item H2- MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Design Review PROJECT: Sprint PCS Antenna LOCATION: 1221 Frost Avenue DATE: September 9, 1998 INTRODUCTION Project Description Action by Council: Indorse Modif i ed,.�,.,,....,_ Re jecte Date - David Hagen of Loucks and Associates, representing Sprint PCS, is asking for approval to install a 80- foot -tall antenna for telecommunications equipment. They want to install this antenna on the site of Al's Auto, 1221 Frost Avenue. (Refer to the maps and plans on pages 6-9.) There would also be. a 1 20'x 2' prefabricated equipment platform near the base of the antenna. PCS would lease a 29'x 80' area from the property owner and would encl the lease area with a six -foot -high chain link fence. (Please also see the information from Sprint on pages 11 -17.) Requests The applicant is requesting that the city approve: 1. A conditional use permit (CUP) for an antenna and related equipment in a BC (business commercial) zoning district. 2. The site, landscaping and fencing plans. BACKGROUND On January 13, 1997, the council adopted the commercial use antenna and tower ordinance. DISCUSSION Conditional Use Permit The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses all telecommunications systems. This licensing requites that the proposed or new telecommunications equipment not interfere with existing communications or electronics equipment. If there is interference, then the FCC requires the telecommunications company to adjustor shut down the new equipment to correct the situation. Maplewood must be careful to not limit or prohibit this tower (or any other tower) because of electronic interference. That is up to the FCC to regulate and monitor. The city may only base their decision on land use and on health, safety and welfare concerns. This project meets the requirements of the tower ordinance and the criteria for a CUP. As proposed, the site design would be compatible with the adjacent commercial structures and uses. (Please see the letter on pages 18 -20.) The city council should approve this request. Design and Site Issues Access to the lease area and tower would be from the existing unpaved driveway on the east side of Al's Auto, that connects to Frost Avenue. As proposed, the antenna would be at least 275 feet from Frost Avenue and 108 feet from the north property Fine. The tower will be 86 and 60 feet from the west and east property lines respectively. The site design would fit in with the nearby commercial buildings. As shown on page 9, the applicant also is proposing to landscape the perimeter of their fence with ) 16 arborvitaes. The tower design will allow a potential collocation of an additional telecommunication provider. This can be. accomplished by raising the tower an additional 40 feet if a company is interested in using the site. The site is currently used for storing automobiles, used tires, trailers and automotive equipment. There also are several vehicles stored on the west side of the site that are the responsibility of D & D Towing, a tenant in the building. Neighborhood Meeting On September 3, 1997, the applicant held a neighborhood meeting at the Maplewood Bowl. They invited all 36 property owners within 350 feet of the site to the meeting. Of those invited, five property owners from three families attended. One property owner was for the proposal and two families expressed concerns about aesthetics, possible effects on property values and the location near the trail. COMMITTEE ACTIONS September 1, 1998: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP. September 8, 1998: The community design review board recommended approval of the plans. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on pages 21 and 22. This resolution approves a conditional use permit to allow a telecommunications antenna up to 120 -feet -tall and the related equipment for the property at 1221 Frost Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by the ordinance and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The owner or applicant shall start the proposed construction within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant or owner shalt allow the collocation of other providers' telecommunications equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions. 2 B. Approve the site and landscape plans date- stamped August 17, 1998, and the elevations date- stamped August 8, 1997, for a telecommunications antenna and equipment on the property at 1221 Frost Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued permits for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit, provide a grading, drainage, driveway and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval. Specifically, these plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plan shall meet all ordinance requirements. b. There shall be a 12- foot -wide bituminous driveway from the existing bituminous in the parking lot to the tower site. 3. Before getting a building permit, the owner shall remove and dispose of any debris, unused motor vehicles, motor vehicle equipment or parts, tires and ensure that the site is cleaned up. 4. The owner or occupant may not remove any of the existing trees on the north side of the property 5. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives cash escrow for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes.. 3 CITIZENS' COMMENTS In 1997, we sent surveys to 36 property owners within 350 feet of the proposed site. Of the 9 - replies the city received, 3 had no comment, 2 were for and 4 objected to the proposal. For am for this proposal. (Hirsch - 315 14th Street, Pine City, and Comford - 77 E. Stevens, St. Paul) Objections 1. 1 don't want to look at it out my living room window. (Rasmussen -1211 E. Ryan Avenue) 2. l do not want to see the tower every day. I'd rather see trees. (Hawkings - 1227 E. Ryan Ave.) 3. This will be any eye sore, perceived. health threat, decrease property value, and degrade Gateway Trail experience. Just because all those businesses on Frost Avenue are already eyesores doesn't justify making it worse! How has the City of Maplewood addressed enhancing the Gateway Trail? There's plenty of room in Phalen Park or Keller Golf course for ugly towers. (Herron - 1106 E. Ryan Avenue) 4. Possible hazards, eyesore, devaluates my property. Put it on the south side of Frost Avenue in the previous site of the Maplewood Auto Clinic. It is equal distance on all sides from residential housing. In 1998, we again sent surveys to the 36 property owners within 350 feet of the proposed site. Of the 12 replies the city received, 5 had no comment, 2 were for and 5 objected to the proposal. Against 1. I am not sure if this will disturb TV or radio reception. Leave as is. (Roehling - 1940 Atlantic Street) 2. It would ruin our view. They should donate property to the park service. (Hunt -1981 Duluth Street) 3. It is an eyesore on the Gateway Trail. The Gateway is an asset. Stop this project. Place on the tower by Highway 36 and English or south on the open field on the south side of Frost (where the building burned). The trail is not just a vacated railroad. Maplewood should wake up and improve this area. Make the Gateway an asset, not an eyesore. (Herron -1106 Ryan Avenue) 4. There is already a tower like this 1 mile or less north by Highway 36. Put it there. (Barr - 1216 Ryan Avenue) 5. Acceptable only if erected across frost in the City Open Space -why doesn't the city want it there if it does not decrease property values, etc. (Kelcher -1210 Ryan Avenue) 4 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Proposed lease area: 2,300 square feet Existing land use: AI's auto vehicle storage SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Single family homes north of the DNR trail ,South: City Open Space across Frost Avenue West: D & D Towing East: George's Auto Repair PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: BC (Business Commercial) Zoning: BC (Business Commercial) Ordinance Requirements Section 36- 607(c) requires a CUP for an antenna in BC (business commercial) zoning district. Findings for CUP Approval Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council must base approval of a CUP on nine standards for approval. Refer to findings one through nine in the resolution on pages 18 and 19. p: sec16 \PCStower. mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan dated 8 -17 -98 4. Proposed Landscape Plan dated 8 -17 -98 5. Elevation dated 8 -8 -97 6. Applicant's letter dated August 8, 1997 7. General Information on Sprint PCS dated August 8, 1997 8. Letter from Loucks and Associates dated August 21, 1998 9. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 10. Plans date- stamped August 17, 1998 (separate attachment) 5 Attachment 1 PLAZA CIR - ALVARADO DR. A BELLECREST DR j DEALMLLE DR MMAN DR all - a VIKING DR. W a ° Q O U C LAURIE CT. cc W Y BURKE CT. BURKE AV ELDRIDGE AV 6ELMONT CN ' SKILLMAN AV. KENW OOD LN . W . cr 3 O � z L o :LLWOOC AVE. Cl ° 0 O 9 w o zz 3 Y J w Q Y . V / O ld, �• ROAD � W . � m � w Porfc COUNTY C c� yi d TO n � El Cr PA- => �EH/ Z v a N CONNOR CCU AVE• Uj cc � ° OT CO NOR z � g cc CT. NIC� DE AVE. �•A V DEMONT F- cn p H ;x t BROOKS ° AVE. V) BROOK wo BROOKS J w 4, � SEX TANT AVE. 2 CT. a SEXTANT AVE. .� 4 AVE. #--• f I ( n P o F� �� GERVAIS AVE. �. GERVAIS � C z g GRAN all - a VIKING DR. W a ° Q O U C LAURIE CT. cc W Y BURKE CT. BURKE AV ELDRIDGE AV 6ELMONT CN ' SKILLMAN AV. KENW OOD LN . W . cr 3 O � z L o :LLWOOC AVE. Cl ° 0 O 9 w o zz 3 Y J w Q Y . O VIEW AVE. z per � Y m VIKING DR. SHERREN AVE. ,•-. N Knuck a eod Lok Cpp COPE LARK Z CT. _ Keller -� S W v AVE. cn L Lake ° CO. RD. _ v cn v LAURIE RD. , L1 Z Pork LELND RD. 0 A o . � o _ � SAND URST � z t� >- JUNCTION AVE. w Z W w B c� Y C P '"' a°r a BV AVE. m ix BURKE AVE. o ® BUR v (1) CHAMBERS ST o C 1) O Q o o ELDR IDGE AVE. 3 John Glem V RS£ AYE. BELMONT AVE. co R GO SKILL AV E. SKI KE �LE LL MAN AVE. NARI; w F;� J o RYAN v Rpor* RC AN AV' T o P 4t M z ' c a ' FROST .::; c oo w AYE. vE. Round Lake EVE. 4 Q � SAINT PAUL s a: a w w FE ON AVE. � W Q � GO 3 DO cc F RiSBIE AVE. Sy O a � N RIP WRINE.Pum" o LEY W SO PH IA N �iQ 2 V S Loke v� ti J Z Pholen o Z o W W ® • U z w AV E. v SU MM�a A MER .� .. V Z � O w 2 G Wokefieid z o 0 o m �O Lake >. -o F` I SO HIA AYE y z Z �J Y w PRICE PN LOCATION 'MAP 6 4 N v O vE. Round Lake EVE. 4 Q � SAINT PAUL s a: a w w FE ON AVE. � W Q � GO 3 DO cc F RiSBIE AVE. Sy O a � N RIP WRINE.Pum" o LEY W SO PH IA N �iQ 2 V S Loke v� ti J Z Pholen o Z o W W ® • U z w AV E. v SU MM�a A MER .� .. V Z � O w 2 G Wokefieid z o 0 o m �O Lake >. -o F` I SO HIA AYE y z Z �J Y w PRICE PN LOCATION 'MAP 6 4 N W ® • U z w AV E. v SU MM�a A MER .� .. V Z � O w 2 G Wokefieid z o 0 o m �O Lake >. -o F` I SO HIA AYE y z Z �J Y w PRICE PN LOCATION 'MAP 6 4 N LOCATION 'MAP 6 4 N Attachment 2 Ilbo VA hl A I j r- 0 _ 0 9 �° 1� ��o �� .Zaac. s .- , ' on ) CJ 0 . 2001 D 4 5 5 2 660 �g) low ISO 19 � 6475) s tM 7 6 7) ( *4-) Q:O 1 33 - 1995 = 994 N N <�� s 0 ,, o cam) � Z$ --- tN 1 N 0 N t - - , t V 1989 1988 < <-) �`) �. AV ,�.z 01 c Ul 0 1 g� zR RY _ ., �R� .� 4 a' 9 TP � ." E N o � . ti R" -a � ' N � .'v 38 !A N N r- M TE RA Z e e 7 •' T 14 v' 1 � , x . t ON p to o. 13 t0 41 a • _:.:� Oki q!MAPLEWOOD BOWL ---- 1 & i� �' l 14 ' y .v' 19 1 ' • tZ '��� X::: � �:_:. . _ �, �� 3 195 0 :° Z� - C, 5. f::; ' , .: ' 1955 _ 40 7o 1 5 ,o •',r,;i;++;nf: •. • ' Z -1940 I , �° •, 4 ELICEK PARK 14 (U (9.) 4 %•: 4 . ....:• ::. N _ Q y s 1187 1- �W � , � J ,�, ' ' .� � • .- 2 -1G -G o - 1201 Q • 1221. '� - F— s ► :- M N I N ' a u nu 9 8 1 G 4 3 4 � - — -- - — ( 17 qj •' f i %tt': i " I 57 _ 2 ' • ' 2 9O : �9 44 • t2. b 4O M 7Z 264 2V ' �° _ _ , .ft ISO i 1 1 1 t o r ■ I :7� � .� s' ✓. 'J O ■ I CITY OPEN SPACE It 1 I 20 / t •1 t _ ; I A E ■N v Q 1l to W ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■. 3 8 ? t O 141 It lk I IF t MEN a0 NONE ■■■■■ ■■■■PLs ■■ ■■■ IG 5 } • Q 11 1 1)4 Q , 0 t PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 N Attachment 3 91 146.42 low � M W 1 0 29. « 8 20 « ° 8 7 � . 3 >� L4etR fLK'1E • a.0 -' '..'j 12.0 •Z OA 7 W ! 14 J one N o ?Few an 5 15 5 4 -, x I OF � If ;» t h". .� ......._..... I le O 4 � 1 SITE PLAN 8-i� �6101 4 N Attachment 4 PLANT LIST SYM NO COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE TA 16 TECHNY ARBORVITAE Thu`a occidentalis 'Techn ' 3' POT 9 TA X- X 6 TA X BASE PLATFORM V .0 BTSMI snBx LAj � " TOWER GATE --NEC,> X � 1 TA x X� ...... TOWER COMPOUND NTS 8' - 7 - 23 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN 9 4 N Attachment 5 . NOTES: 1. ANTENNA ELEVAT+ON I$ TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE .ANT PAN ANTENNAS O ORIENTED AT O'. 12(7, & 240' FROM TRUE NOR1H. 2. GENERATOR AND PROPANE TANK REOUIRED ONLY AT NEW SITES REOUIRING F AA LIGHTING. FIELD SHALL LOCATE GENERATOR WITH SLAB AN PROPANE TAUK. 3, FIELD Vi.;L.L MOUNT THE FIRST Two ANTENNAS AT 12' - SPACING SUCH THAT THE 40uNI NG EOUIPmENT CAN ACCOmOOATE A TOTAL OF FOUR ANTENNAS AT A 4' - 0 SPACING NI THE FUTURE. 4. FIELD ROUTE FVEI LINE FROM PROPANE TANK TO GENERATOR. IF WSTALLED. S. AT SITES WHICH REOUIRE FAA LIGHTING. NO TOWER SHALL 8E ERECTED UNTIL AC POWER AND POTS ARE AVAILABLE. 6. THE LENCTH FOR ALL Cou CABLE RUNS FROM THE RFFE UNITS TO THE u u • ANTENNAS IS 1 25' - wx11tuM. u u 7. LIGHTNING ROO'SNALL EXTEND 5' -1Y A90VE TOP OF ANTENNAS. u u S. SEE DWG Cl FOR SITE GROUNDING DETAILS S. -d' SWALE DITCH M"uUW 1' -0' DEEP w/ 3 : 1 3 CROWN SIDE SLOPES SLOPE ON SLOPE ON 3 : 1 SLOPE TO EXISTING GRADE ExISTW6 GRADE s' CRUSHED STONE BASE COURSE GEOTEXTILE CL ACCESS ROAD TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION uwl BTS PPC !1 II I . 1 C D LIGHTNING ROD (SEE NOT 7) u u �n n u si CL ANTENNAS MOUNTED AT 80' -0' ASICIVE GRADE (SEE NOTE 3) I I: 6' -T RESIDENTIAL GRADE CWM LINK FENCE W1 1H 3 STRAND WeED WIRE C 3' DEEP AGGRECATE OVER GEOTEXTILE 6 -+ '%- CRADE CONCRETE PIER ..,. F SECTION OF TOWER COMPOUND FACING AST RELEASED FOR __. N C , ST UCTIO /T SIGNED DATE g -�17 10 4 N Attachment 6 EXIBIT A Sprint PCS CUP/Development Board Review Site Information L U \YY ig Applicant Sprint PCS Contact Paul. Harrington 8 1997 Sprint PCS y 2900 Lone Oak Parkway #140 - ---- - - r Eagan, MN 55121 612.686.2669 (Phone) 612.686.2700 (Fax) Site Location Al's Auto - 1221 Frost Avenue - Maplewood, MN 55109 Current Zoning BC, Business Commercial Comp Plan Designation BC, Business Commercial Municipal Utilities The site is served by Municipal utilities Adjacent Zoning Direction Zone North R, Single Dwelling South R -2, Double Dwelling East BC, Business Commercial West BC, Business Commercial Case History 1221 Frost Avenue is located on platted property approximately 1.25 miles East of Highway 61 on Frost Avenue. The legal description is attached to the enclosed applications. Development in the immediate vicinity of the site includes single family residences to the North, commercial to the East and Keller Golf Course to the West. Although currently zoned for multi - family use, the property to the immediate South of the site is undeveloped. Introduction Sprint PCS is requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review in order to attach six (6) foot tall panel antennas to the top of an 80' monopole structure. The associated, ground equipment necessary for the operation of the antennas would be located on a 15'x 20' raised (approximately two feet) platform near the base of the tower. The Conditional Use Permit is being requested per the following sections of the Maplewood City Code: 11 Section Subject 36-605 Conditional Use Permit 36 -607 Construction Requirements, Setback and Height Restrictions in Districts other than Residential Co- Location Alternatives The Maplewood Ordinance requires that applicants for Antenna Tower construction provide documentation as to the available co- location possibilities within V2 mile of the proposed tower location prior to City consideration. Sprint PCS conducts site selection based upon the following formula: Step one in the site selection process involves engineering studies and projections for "coverage" based upon topography, anticipated usage and ability to propagate signal. The Sprint PCS Radio Frequency (RF) Engineers then provide Property Staff with an area (commonly referred to as a Search Ring) within which to locate a site. The goal of the RF process is to ensure that coverage for potential users is "seamless" and will not result in an y dead areas where calls may be lost. Once in possession of a defined search ring, property representatives explore alternatives for antenna location based upon willingness of property owners to sign a lease for location of the equipment and zoning regulations. Co- location types include water towers, existin g structures of sufficient height and existing towers in the area. Co- locations are preferred for a number of reasons: security is better, zoning approvals are more easily acquired and, most importantly, costs are greatly reduced. Within the defined search ring for the Maplewood area, there are no existing structures which provide sufficient height for operation of the system at the level desired by Sprint PCS RF Engineers. The closest water tower to the proposed site is over one (1) mile East of the site on the Ramsey County Fairgrounds Findings The criteria to be considered by the City Council for the granting of Conditional Use Permits are listed below with findings: Criteria #1 The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 12 Finding #1 The proposed use meets all requirements of the Maplewood City Code as it relates to Antenna Tower siting including: required setbacks, height limitations, color and screening. The site is located within the Gladstone Planning Area of the City Comprehensive Guide Plan. The site is designated BC, Business Commercial in this document. Criteria #2 The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. Finding #2 The site is currently designated for commercial development according to the Maplewood Zoning Ordinance. Development of Antenna facilities is a conditioned use within Commercial. zone districts in the City. Development within the general vicinity of the site includes long - established commercial operations, residential dwellings and Keller Golf*Course. The City Comprehensive Guide Plan designates the subject property as BC - Business Commercial. Criteria #3 The use would not depreciate property values. Finding #3 Sprint PCS has found no measurable or identifiable impact on residential property values due to tower construction. A copy of a real estate value impact study is included with this application for your review. Criteria #4 The Use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisance. Finding #4 There is no evidence that the use, as conditioned, would be injurious to the public health, safety or general welfare of the community. Sprint PCS transmissions operate at very low power levels. There is no evidence that PCS transmissions are harmful to the health or safety of the persons living or working nearby. Sprint PCS engineers have calculated that the worst case scenario would actually be eight (8) times below the limit set by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has adopted the standards set by the ANSI. According to the FCC, measurements that have been made near typical cellular base stations have shown that ground level power densities are well below the limits recommended by radio frequency and microwave safety standards. In addition, each Sprint PCS site is registered with and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration - therefore posing no threat to air navigation. The operation of the antenna site produces no noise, is odorless and completely self- sufficient. Routine visits to the site for general maintenance 13 and equipment checks are made on a quarterly basis. Visits to the site in the event of equipment or power failure are on an as- needed basis. Criteria #5 The Use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. Finding #5 As mentioned in finding #4, visits to the site are limited to general maintenance check -ups and emergency situations on an as- needed basis. Criteria #6 The Use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, Police and Fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. Finding #6 Operation of the Antenna site is dependent upon the provision of power and telephone on the property. Both of these utilities are present on the .1221 Frost Avenue property. The Use would not require water and sewer and security is provided by the installation of a chain link fence around the Tower compound area (please see attached drawings). Criteria #7 The Use would not create excessive costs for additional public facilities or services. Finding 47 As mentioned in finding 46, the Use only requires power and telephone - both of which are currently available on the site. As conditioned, the Use would not have an adverse impact upon any governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements. The proposed use would not create excessive requirements for public facilities or services. In fact, the approval of the proposal would enhance the area's communication abilities by helping to provide PCS services to a portion of the City of Maplewood. Criteria #8 The Use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. Finding #8 The proposed location of the Tower and associated ground equipment is screened from Frost Avenue via existing commercial development on the site and to the North by a large grove of trees. Criteria #9 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Finding #9 As mentioned in finding # 4, the Use exceeds all requirements established by the Federal Communications Commission for radio frequency emissions. Also, as stated previously, the operation of the facility will generate no odor or noise. 14 Attachment 7 81997 EXIBIT B Sprint PCS CUP/Development Board Review General Information - Sprint PCS and Personal Communication Services (PCS) Introduction Sprint PCS is a participant in the Personal Communications Services (PCS) market. It is an alliance which consists of the following four major corporations: 1) Sprint Corporation; 2) Tele- Communications Incorporated (TCI); 3) Cox Communications; and 4) Comcast Corporation. The purpose of this alliance is to provide consumers with a variety of telecommunication services including local telephone service, long distance service, wireless communications and cable services. PCS is the result of a growing demand for improved wireless telecommunication services, and a new infrastructure is needed to meet this growing demand. Background In early 1995, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) auctioned licenses for the 1850- 1990 MHz band of the radio spectrum within the 51 Major Tradin g Areas (MTA's) of the United States for use by Personal Communications Services. Sprint PCS purchased licenses within 29 of these 51 defined MTA's. These licenses, in combination with the licenses awarded to its affiliates and other providers, will enable Sprint PCS to offer seamless Personal Communications Services virtually anywhere in the country. What is PCS? PCS technology combines voice and data services using digital interfacing equipment. This facilitates a higher quality transmission with greater voice clarity than currently Y used b cellular technology. PCS will give consumers more freedom with respect to their telecommunication needs. PCS will offer enhanced service features such as portable phones, pagers, facsimile transmission, and wireless voice service at a lower cost than existing cellular service. PCS is on the cutting edge of the wireless revolution. Services of PCS include: • Local and long distance telephone services and cable services; • All -in -one Wireless Communication Services; • Portable phones, pagers and fax transmission; • Numeric paging .on the phone's screen; • Interactive paging (two -way paging that allows the sender to track where the message is sent and when it has been received); 15 • Voice -mail service; • Caller ID; • International roaming capability; • Reduced power needs (allows smaller units and longer battery life); and • In the future, PCS will allow computer use and video imaging over the PCS network Benefits of PCS over Cellular PCS has several advantages over existing cellular telephone service, including better service quality through the use of digital technology, more compact radio equipment, increased mobility, enhanced service features and price. Digital Technology: Digital technology facilitates cleaner voice quality, but more importantly, clean data communication. A PCS customer will be able to communicate through voice and data simultaneously using the same handset without interference to either activity. In addition, computer users will be able to run applications and retrieve data faster from remote locations using their handset. PCS technology also provides less static and fading, and there are fewer dropped or lost calls. Improved Security: Calls in digital format cannot be overheard with the kind of simple scanners currently used to eavesdrop on cellular calls. Although it is technically possible to eavesdrop on a digitally transmitted call, the effort would require special equipment and an advanced technical knowledge of the system. Improved Equipment: PCS will utilize smaller antennae and handsets along with a more advanced telecommunication technology that will result favorable rates to consumers. Handsets will be lighter and use longer lasting batteries than the current cellular "flip" phones. Because of Sprint PCS' assigned radio spectrum, there will be more antenna's. However, every effort has been made to locate equipment on existing structures rather than building free - standing towers. Increased Mobility: With PCS, mobility means seamless roaming across existing cellular and landline service areas. A PCS handset can be taken anywhere and be expected to function the same as in the coverage area of the original service provider. One Telephone Number: With PCS, one Personal Communications Number (PCN) will be assigned to each individual user. Today, when a person changes their residence, the old landline telephone number is frequently lost because these numbers are assigned and based on geographic area. Cellular telephone numbers are also lost when carriers are switched because cellular service companies are provided a limited range of numbers, and the numbers have to be recycled or 16 reused.. A PCN associates a telephone number with a person, regardless of where he or she is .located, and regardless of who is the service provider. Lower Cost for Service: PCS will be cheaper in the long term because it will utilize digital technology. Initially, the cost for the service and handsets will be similar to that of cellular. However, with increased demand, both carriers and manufacturers will be able to lower their price significantly.. Eventually, PCS service will be less than cellular and will be close to the cost of wireline telephone service. Increasing'Demand Today, cellular telephone systems in the US are expanding at the rate of over 28,000 new subscriptions per day, far beyond the growth rate of new subscriptions for wireline telephone service. The popularity of cellular telephone service is due to the freedom, mobility and enhanced productivity that it provides. No longer are people tied to fixed telephones or pay phones. Yet cellular telephone services are just one step toward another type of service, one expected to revolutionize telecommunications. The next rung on the evolutionary ladder is PCS. 17 Attachment 8 PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVE"r'ING //JJ ENVIRONMENTAL gc:Asac4a-t¢S, 21W. ARCHAEOLOGY August 21., 1998 Ms. Melinda Coleman Community Development Director City of Maplewood 1830 East Count Road B Maplewood, Minn. 55109 Re: Proposed Sprint Spectrum L.P. Monopole Tower and Antennas at 1221 Frost Avenue Dear Ms. Coleman: This letter is intended to supplement earlier submissions relative to the above captioned matter. It covers the alternatives considered within one -half mile radius of the proposed tower and - factors to be considered by the City Council in reviewing an application for a conditional use permit for construction of commercial antennas, towers and accessory structures. Section 36 -610 of the Maplewood City Code indicates that a new personal wireless service tower shall not be approved unless it can be documented by the applicant to the satisfaction of the Cit Council that the telecommunications equipment planned for the proposed tower cannot be accommodated on an existing or approved tower or commercial building within one -half mile radius, transcending municipal borders, of the proposed tower due to one of several reasons. Attached is a map of the city with a circle of one -half mile radius from the tower shown. No existing towers or commercial buildings of more than two stories within one -half mile radius of the proposed tower were found. Two apartment buildings and a church within the one -half mile radius were found. Even if permitted by the zoning ordinance, however, the proposed tower cannot be accommodated on an existing or approved tower or commercial building within one- . g half mile radius of the proposed tower at a height necessary to function per Section 36.610.3. of the Maplewood City Code. Exhibit A included with the original August 8, 1997 submission set forth findings relative to standards for approval of a conditional use permit as set forth in Section 36 -442 of the Maplewood City Code. The standards parallel closely the factors to be considered b the City ty Council in reviewing a conditional use permit for construction of commercial antennas, towers and accessory structures. Following in regular type are the factors to be considered as set forth in Section 36-605 of the Maplewood City Code and, in italic type, excerpts out of Exhibit A of the August 8, 1998 submission: (1) Standards in the City code, and (5) Effect of the proposed use on the comprehensive plan. The proposed use meets all requirements of the Maplewood City Code as it relates to Antenna Tower siting including: required setbacks, height limitations, color and screening. The site is located within the Gladstone Planning Area of the City Comprehensive Guide Plan. The site is designated BC, Business Commercial in this document. LOUCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC. • 7200 HEMLOCK LANE, SUITE 300 • MAPLE GROVE. MINNESOTA 55369 -5592 • TEL: (612) 424 -5505 • F.-\x: (612) 424 -5822 e -mail: Loucks @minn.net . web page: http: / /\tixtiw 1 .minn.net /- Ioucks/ PAUL R. MCLAGAN & SON • 6015 CAHILL AVENUE EAST • INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 55076 • TEL: (651) 45-37-3645 • F. \x: (651) 457 -8642 Page 2- August 21, 1998 letter to Ms. Melinda Coleman (2) Recommendations of the Planning Commission and Community Design Review Board. Not addressed in Exhibit A of August 8, 1998 submission. (3) Effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of residents of surrounding areas. There is no evidence that the use, as conditioned, would be injurious to the public health, safety or general welfare of the community. Sprint PCS transmissions operate at very low power levels. There is no evidence that PCS transmissions are harmful to the health or safety of the persons living or working nearby. Sprint PCS engineers have calculated that the worst case scenario would actually be eight (8) times below the limit set by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has adopted the .standards set by the ANSI. According to the FCC, measurements that have been made near typical cellular base stations have shown that ground level power densities are well below the _ limits recommended by radio frequency and microwave safety standards. In addition each Sprint PCS site is registered with and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration- therefore posing no threat to air navigation. The operation of the antenna site produces no noise, is odorless and completely self - sufficient. Routine visits to the site for general maintenance and equipment checks are made on a quarterly basis. Visits to the site in the event of equipment or power failure are on an as- needed basis. (4) Effect on property values. Sprint PCS has found no measurable or identifiable impact on residential property values due to tower construction. A copy of a real estate value impact study is (was) included with this (the August 7, 1997) application for your review. Through the original submission of August 8, 1997 and the supplemental submittals on August 3, 1998 and August 17, 1998 and this submittal it has been demonstrated that this to construct a monopole tower and antennas at 1221 Frost Avenue meets all standards and requirements for the granting of a conditional use permit. We respectfully request that the City f Maplewood ty p grant the requested conditional use permit. Sincerely, David Hagen Senior Planner Copy: Gary Gandrud- Faegre & Benson 19 7 I o Or oil RAM , t:'� C '>; i J � .a. ''I:� l {. �'►tf WE � 74 7 . • , �� �• a•1a`�. pit ee� e� 'n.._`�i 1' - !•" � .� a :i iL�, �iF�' {����'.a � _. - ..�Q 1�rit'.•M b. A S;;,v, _t �� S�® +- a:�w '. t�a.`T 1 - 'x..T _ �!. v��~ _, - \ �' r }.. + •.1� �� 41 4 0 I h. 4, • V A V X, 4 i t- . H Hiff 1H IE310 offilulpol . Ulm=" A� -1 n1 m K i m 11mommt! 111olum 1 W U111 BOOM ; T, WIN amtm �' .='= ■ ■ ■'n��,n..•.� a ��t� [I 111111 "1 lion _.�. ■�I���■ ..e,:�„rre. O a some WH ZOO ��t ■/UI!/► ;.' _' �� t V '� 1111 WNW ♦ 4.4 1111 MUM nut r■ � = +�� ��� ® �sfe��rHr�► ht Ah -loons -lo is ram w. Ar gas Mioaffi— low- NM IdLk �. -,f, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. David Hagen of Loucks and Associates, representing Sprint PCS., applied for a conditional use permit to install a 80- foot -tall telecommunications antenna and related equipment. City staff is recommending a CUP for installation of a 120 -foot tower to allow for easy collocation. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at 1221 Frost Avenue. The legal description is: East '/2 of the vacated Duluth Street accruing and following; except the east 8.57 feet, Lots 11 through 14 and Lots . 16 through 19 also all of Lot 15 in Block 3, of the northwest 1 /4 in Section 16, Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 16- 29 -22 -14 -0090) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On September 1, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on September 28, 1998. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 21 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The owner or applicant shall start the proposed construction within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant or owner shall allow, the collocation of other providers' telecommunications equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1998. 22 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Conditional Use Permit — Sprint PCS Telecommunications Tower (1221 Frost Avenue) Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts said the request was for a 80 -foot -tall antenna but the proposal is for 120 feet so if another company wants to collocate they would not have to go through the conditional use permit process. it would already be approved to extend the tower height. Commissioner Trippler questioned the zoning ordinance on towers that said the tower should not exceed 75 feet and could be increased to 100 feet for collocation. Mr. Roberts said these allowances were for communication towers in residential districts. The dimensions requested are in compliance with those allowed for towers in other than residential districts. He said the applicant is not required to treat the residence at 1940 Atlantic Street, which is at least 200 feet from the site, as a residential property because it is planned and zoned for commercial use. It was noted that there is a residence above George's Auto Body and they have indicated that they are in favor of the tower. Commissioner Trippler said he was excited about having the tower locate here because the developer is requiring the owner to clean up this property. He was concerned that there is not a process or plan for deciding where towers should be located. Mr. Trippler asked if staff could be proactive and set up a procedure for planning the location of future towers. Commissioner Rossbach said the planning commission and the city council spent a lot of time developing the current plan which is fairly specific about the location and height of towers. He suggested that it would be nice if the communication companies had a plan. Mr. Rossbach referred to the lawsuit that the city just lost because of a location that the city objected to. He noted that residents object to the towers when they are in their neighborhood but frequently do not notice them in other areas once they are installed. Commissioner Pearson concurred with Mr. Trippler about having the area cleaned up. Michael Thompson, planning specialist for Sprint PCS, was present. He said they have reviewed the staff report and have no objections. Mr. Thompson introduced Alex Diedrich, a radio frequency engineer; Gary Gandrud, legal counsel from Faegri and Benson; Dave Hagen, real estate broker from Loucks & Associates, Tom Zimmerman, Capital Land Services, and Al Olson (the landlord) of AI's Auto. Mr. Thompson gave some history of the telecommunications market. He said about three or four years ago the Federal Communication Commission took the initiative to introduce new technology and competition into the wireless industry by auctioning off allocated frequency bands. He said Maplewood is in the Minneapolis /St. Paul Major Trading Area which is comprised of most of Minnesota, all of North Dakota, two- thirds of South Dakota, some of Iowa, a large portion of Wisconsin and the upper peninsula of Michigan. Previous to the auctions, the industry had been dominated by a few large companies. He said that, as a result of anti -trust legislation, companies have to operate rather independently of each other, but collocation is definitely encouraged. Mr. Thompson said that putting up a new tower is a last resort for his company. Mr. Thompson said there are certain performance requirements mandated by the auction rules. Sprint is required to achieve a certain level of market coverage within five years of being awarded the rights to a particular frequency. He said they do not see any major increase in usage that would require another site in this area within the foreseeable future. He said they can increase the capacity of this tower by adding another set of electronic ground equipment. While Sprint has the advantage of possible collocator revenue from sub- tenants, they also incur a large cost in constructing this tower. According to Mr. Thompson, Sprint's policy is to allow at least one additional carrier. Depending on the height and the mounting of the antenna, sometimes two Planning Commission -7_ Minutes of 09 -01 -98 additional carriers can be accommodated. Commissioner Pearson asked for assurance that once the area is cleaned up and fenced, there would be an agreement that the fenced area cannot be used for further storage of the same materials. He was concerned that it didn't become a "fenced storage area." Mr. Thompson said they were willing to work with the owner and the c o accommodate the wish y es of the people. Commissioner Rossbach clarified that Mr. Pearson was asking if Sprint would be allowing storage inside th fenced area of materials other than the telecommunication equipment. Mr. Thompson said their com ound is not accessible b P y the owner except with escort by Sprint PCs personnel. Mr. Thompson said other towers in the search ring have been evaluated i and they were ether out of position or too short. AI Olson, the property owner, noted that the lot is also used for D and D Towing which is M.aplewood's impound lot. He said there will be cars on the lot but the cleanup they are looking for is the junk cars, tires, etc. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit to allow a teleco mmunications antenna up to 120- feet -tall and the related equipment for the 122 property at - 1 Frost Avenue. � P Y • ue. Approval is based on the findings required by the ordinance and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall. follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of communit development may approve minor changes. 2. The owner or applicant shall start the proposed construction within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one Y ear. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant or owner shall allow the collocation of other providers' telecommunications equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. Agenda item �{3 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit (Auto. Service and Repair) gotion tW Coune��.: LOCATION: 1420 County Road D DATE: September 2, 1998 tndorsed____ INTRODUCTION Project Description Mori f l a .r.r.�.. Re J ected D ite Daniel Bondeson, of Bond Enterprises, Inc., is proposing to open an auto service and repair shop in the General Sprinkler Building at 1.420 County Road D. He would lease about 3,000 square feet of the 13,800 square -foot building. To start this business., the applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for a maintenance garage in the M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning district. Refer to the plans on pages 4 -8 and the intended use statement on pages 9 and 10. The developer is not proposing any exterior changes to the site. BACKGROUND O December 9, 1996, the city council approved a variance for a narrower wetland- protection buffer for the General Sprinkler Building. The code required a 100 - foot -wide undisturbed buffer and the council approved a reduction to 40 feet. On -July, 29, 1997, the community design review board approved the design plans for this building. DISCUSSION Conditional Use Permit The proposed auto detailing and repair business meets the criteria for a CUP. If kept inside the building, this business should not impact any of the nearby properties. Parking The number of parking spaces on the site exceeds the code requirements. The code requires 24 spaces for the existing office space and 9 spaces for the existing warehouse space for a total of 33 spaces. There are 55 off - street parking spaces on the site. COMMISSION ACTION On September 1, 1998, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution beginning on page 11. This resolution approves a conditional use permit to operate an auto detailing and repair business in Unit "C" of the building at 1420 County Road D. The city bases this permit approval on the standards required by ordinance and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed auto service business must be started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. There shall be no outside storage of refuse or vehicle parts of any kind (including tires and wheels) unless in a screening enclosure. The developer or contractor shall submit plans for screening enclosures to staff for approval of placement and design. Any outside storage not in an enclosure shall have city council approval. 5. The owner or operator shall not allow anyone to work on vehicles outside the building. All employees shall do the vehicle repair and maintenance inside the building. 6. There shall not be any outside display or storage of materials, parts or equipment. 2 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.79 acres Existing Land use: General Sprinkler office warehouse building and parking lot SURROUNDING LAND USES North: County Road D and I -694 South: Undeveloped Watershed District property West: Two single dwellings planned and zoned M -1 (light manufacturing) East: Northern States Power substation and driveway PLANNING Land use plan designation and zoning: M -1 (light manufacturing) Ordinance Requirements Section 36- 151(b)(9) requires a CUP for any maintenance garage in a M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning district. Criteria for CUP Approval Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. Refer to the findings in the resolution on pages 11 and 12. p:sec3lbondentr.mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Site Plan 5. Floor Plan 6. Applicant's Statement Dated August 20, 1998 7. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 8. Plans date- stamped August 19, 1998 (separate attachment) 3 Attachment VADNAIS HEIGHTS 19 Q COUNTY RD. D Q - r cr P� COUNTY 0 UJ 4. o 000 J w �i 1. o G oc z 2. 1. SUMMIT CT. z4 vi 2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR. ST w 3 3. DULUTH CT. �p �p G� i p 4. LYDIA ST. � B� 1/p y NS p D BEAM AVE. D • 19 � ,T RADATZ o ° 0 o° v w Il Kohlman RAf v W F- ake COI � = .00 C0l KOHLMAN AVE. t` U c w KOHLM z � Q Hoz W D AV • Pork U Z E. COUNTY ROAD C w w @ Q TO m , �i El %rn CT :3 g V D w U Z i§ w w 5 C M 3 c z EDGEHILL RD. CO w VE. N NOR U C� AVE, v DEMONT AVE. AVE. %r m .0 Sri o 6ROOKS AVE. BROOKS w cn S W AVE. 0 °Q SEX TANT z Q Q Four � SEXTANT AVE..' AVE. sPv� Z P �c.• � o GERVAIS AVE. l� U _ COP COPE D LARK g CT. W J tn n 25 Q LOCATION MAP 4 �- GERVAIS Q GERVAIS GRANDVIEW AVE. Z CT. m VIKING DR. �z Y SHERREN AVE. Knuc a R ad Lake C AVE. AVE. 0 v LARK Q AVE. . 4 N mmwmwm�� Attachment 2 VADNAIS HEIGHTS 6 pop' i , goo :C o -S MM CQ U NTY ROAD D �t ■ 4 - ; 3 2 ^'1 • 1 . � �� O, i o .�+ ......... .......... 0 1 is t 4 1 � 32 3 0 2 2 N S P i 9 2 9 3 D a c 3110 1 0 ... ....................... ' - - --- ----- ..... 3085 co 3090 .40 z e e z 3 f• • 1��� w � �' O W 1 l ►` .v4R 13 j 8B ,�� • f !p , P, P P rox hi gh TenSt on pow O H-- --•� -a 4--_., «- Z3. o o �-- - ---1 o F- - -i i �C°� ~S•T D O L CO P, P E L. r+ 4�: 2 � �� BACKYARD �► ,0 BUILDING o ti 7 324'r- 0 Q J SYSTEMS . .J-3.56 5!0 S - - 70 4 LEXUS N D O P I , '� E � v 3 000 J�k�' S N 7) ? 5 r• PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 N Attachment 3 tin �,., �•.,•• .•t1 ��"ra. s.. • •. ,�: y 0 . . �•�• . ~ NE * • • .. 4. ;t ' y,�..• ,.ay '•f�+;i ' •.. •�: �;,��a , :.. y:,'!t�•� t.' � 'N. .,• . : r' . . .• i �:� �.,. '; j. 01D -p MAL I. on o � ,. ••,• ,' .t.r • . � �• • .I' 'r e I , • � i A' .. e .. • ,� .� '_•.� .i• . /+V \ ' , �' ■fOIC. *[tall ./ / �\ � .�•�•'�+ . ' i r w�M qqt�y / , , � , •. � •' \ ' • ' •. � /�. � IS Al �• ' � ,: � /. I V 1 ' lop ; ♦ice .�'.�. ... y � T � . �• ♦ , � •�•� ' ^ ♦�. � ' , ••• � ., _' •. •'�,, .♦ i` r -• .. ; �- u. r BOO/ M�IiM '• •, . . ..';• ; ' ' ' • ' ' ; i, ; r � • �w Ries ru' P i • � � � I ft" raw am 11talt op S` •w � a s Comm wR wt • • ✓ ! � ;0000 - ♦ , r W" co Kop -l"Iflow Mot Jr. ON OWL as grlfmTw IINCEL • ♦'' POND: AREA OR A-4 n--O ISPIAN \ , J w SITE PLAN 0 4 N Attachment 4 _ w L - \ t IK toy LM or -11 UACT A. NFOSW O NAG KOWY MQ M 10 ICXAMM SITE PLAN 4 N Attachment 5 �r �`��'' `� : ' ter•. � I�� 1' �AV.� r o 40 00, �/` `,. • �' � •� . +. � ' `' is '�, �• i r {� • �• o v 4 ., y •fir � �� r FLOOR PLAN s 4 N Attachment 6 INTENDED TTSF OF PROPERTY S " Tenant will occupy 3,014sq. Ft. of a newly constructed 13,83bs . Ft. building located at q g 1420 E County Road D. The property owner has previously applied for a building permit. In this building the tenant will operate an automobile detailing and light automobile repair business consisting of general maintenance ie, oil changes, tune -ups, computer diagnostics and repair, brake and exhaust work, service schedules and safety checks. The use of this space will comply with the cities Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances in respect to location, n, design, maintenance, construction and operation. The use would not impact the existing or planned character of the surroundin g area. Tenant will occupy interior space of the building with minimal outside employee and customer parking. Tenants use would not depreciate local property values do to the fact that tenant intended use would be inside the building with no ermanent outside storage of inventory, r p g ry, p operty, machinery, implements, automobiles, tools or equipments. Tenant will have on sight material safety data sheets and separate disposal containment systems complying with the Department of Public Healths Small Generator Hazardous Waste Act including but not limited to used oil, used oil filters, used anti - freeze and other automotive fluids floor -dry, and other absorbent. Disposal of these hazardous products will be provided by a licensed or certified environmental agencies. The building is located on a dead end street with the only other facility along this section of County Road D. being a Northern States Power substation. There will be no traffic congestion or unsafe access to the property. The tenant will employ no more than 3 employees. The tenants, commercial space, is visible and accessible to county, local and independent interests. A restroom and drinkin g water is available for the public. The City of Maplewood has previously approved the water, sewer and drainage system. Because the building is privately owned the cost for lawn service and snow removal is the responsibility of the owner. Building owner is responsible for maintaining the preservation of the building including it natural and scenic features. The tenant will maintain the inside space, under lease, in a clean and business manner. This business complies with the Department of Public Health's classification of "Small Generator", there will be minimal adverse environmental effects. 10 Attachment 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Daniel Bondeson, representing Bond Enterprises Inc., applied for a conditional use permit to operate an automobile repair and service maintenance garage. WHEREAS, this permit applies to Unit "C" of the property at 1420 County Road D. The legal description is: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 525, Ramsey County, MN (PIN 03- 29 -22 -22 -0013) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On September 1, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On , 1998, the city council held .a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and Code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. . 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 11 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 10. There would not be a significant affect on the development of the parcel as zoned. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All, construction shall follow the plans approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed auto service business must be started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. There shall be no outside storage of refuse or vehicle parts of any kind (including tires and wheels) unless in a screening enclosure. The developer or contractor shall submit plans for screening enclosures to staff for approval of placement and design. Any outside storage not in an enclosure shall have city council approval. 5. The owner or operator shall not allow anyone to work.on vehicles outside the building. All employees shall do the vehicle repair and maintenance inside the building. 6. There shall not be any outside display or storage of materials, parts or equipment. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1998. 12 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 C. Conditional Use Permit— Bondeson Enterprises (1420 County Road D East) Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Rossbach suggested limiting the amount of traffic on County Road D until the street is improved or developing the road and making it suitable commercial use. Ken Haider, city engineer, said there is I.imited use of the roadway. He said there is only the building at 1420 County Road D and the NSP facility. Mr. Haider said the roadway, up to the driveways on this site are adequate and convenient for public use." Mr. Roberts clarified that outdoor storage of whole vehicles might be allowed. He didn't want parts of vehicles stored outside. Daniel .Bondeson of Bond Enterprises, the applicant, was present. Mr. Bondeson said any vehicles being left for a period of time will be stored inside. He said vandalism was a concern. Mr. Pondeson also said the health department is getting strict on storage of hazardous waste. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit to operate an auto detailing and repair business in Unit "C" of the building at 1420 County Road D. The city bases this permit approval on the standards required by ordinance and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor Changes. 2. The proposed auto service business must be started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. There shall be no outside storage of refuse or vehicle parts of any kind (including tires and wheels) unless in a screening enclosure. The developer or contractor shall submit plans for screening enclosures to staff for approval of placement and design. Any outside storage not in an enclosure shall have city council approval. 5. The owner or operator shall not allow anyone to work on vehicles outside the building. All employees shall do the vehicle repair and maintenance inside the building. 6. There shall not be any outside display or storage of materials, parts or equipment. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes --all The motion passed. Agenda Item I� MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Wetland Setback Variance and Design Review — Battle Creek Regional Park Aquatic Facility LOCA TION: Battl tember 15, 9ggg l Park —Upper Afton Road and McKnight Road 4 0t10 0 b DATE y Cott jl �doM Itoftrie INTRODUCTION Abject- Date Project Pescription Larry Holmberg, of the Ramsey County Regional Parks and Recreation Department, is requesting approval of plans for the proposed Battle Creek Regional Park Aquatic Facility. This facility would be located at Battle Creek Regional Park on the north side of Upper Afton Road at the northeast comer of the main parking lot. Refer to the maps on pages 9-11. There would be two pools. The larger of the two would be a zero -depth -entry pool that increases to a depth of 18 inches with a play structure in the middle. The other pool would be four feet deep with a slide and would be set up for activities like volleyball. There would also be a sand play area. Refer to the site plan and building elevations. The applicant is also proposing to build a 100 -space parking lot south of Upper Afton Road for overflow parking. Refer to the site plan on page 11. Requests The applicant is requesting that the city council approve: 1. An 80 -foot wetland setback variance from the wetland- protection buffer ordinance. The city proposed code requires that the ro osed aquatic facility provide a 100 -foot -wide, no- disturb wetland- . q protection buffer from the edge of the wetland. The Ramsey - Washington Metro District classified this wetland as a Class 1 wetland. Class 1 wetlands are those with conditions and functions most susceptible to human impact, are most unique and have the highest community resource significance. The applicant is requesting a variance because their grading edge would be 20 feet from the wetland. Refer to the applicant's letter on page 12. 2.. Building, site and landscape plans. PERMITTED USE The Aquatic Facility is a Permitted Use This proposed aquatic facility is a permitted use in a public park and in accordance with the zoning ordinance. The ordinance requires, however, that the Maplewood Community Design Review Board (CDRB) review the site and building plans to consider design elements. The CDRB's authority permits them to make changes in the plans relative to building design, landscaping and parking layout. They do not have the zoning authority to deny this project based on land use. DISCUSSION Wetland- Buffer Variance Staff does not recommend approval of this variance. According to state law, the need for a .variance must be due to circumstances unique to the property —not created by the land owner. This is not the case. The applicant has considerable land available with which to meet the required 100 setback from the wetland. if the applicant moved the facility 80 feet to the north, for example, they would still have 280 feet of mature woods to buffer this facility from the nearest homes at the south end of Crestview Drive. This, however, is not a suitable option for the neighbors to the north who are opposed to the project in the first place. Staff prepared a resolution for a variance in case the city council wants to approve the proposed 20 -foot wetland setback (see pages 29 -30). This variance would be because the buffer is already disturbed by the picnic grounds that encroach into the buffer. If the council approves a variance, the county must dedicate a wetland buffer easement according to the ordinance (code requirement). Greg Mack, of Ramsey County Parks and Recreation, objected to this at the CDRB meeting. To waive this easement- dedication requirement, the council must make it part of the resolution approving the variance. Staff did not include this as part of the attached resolution. Building Design /Screening /Landscaping and Noise Concerns Buildnd_,Design / Screening / Landscaping The proposed building would be attractive. The facility would be sufficiently screened from the houses to the north by 280 feet of mature tree growth -- provided the city council denies the variance and the county moves the facility 80 feet to the north. (Presently, the plan shows a setback of 360 feet from the nearest home at the south end of Crestview Drive.) The proposed landscaping would be an attractive accent to the facility. Noise Most of the neighbors are concerned about noise from this facility. They feel it will be a nuisance, ruin their peaceful neighborhood and damage their property values. Staff discussed the permitted noise levels with Brian Timerson, of the Minnesota Pollution Control Noise Division, to discuss whether the proposed facility would violate the maximum noise limits permitted. Mr. Timerson had the following comments: 1. The maximum day time residential decibel levels allowed are 65 decibels for a period of six minutes an hour (referred to as the L10- -a time duration meaning 10 percent of an hour) and 60 decibels for a period of 30 minutes an hour (referred to as the L50 --50 percent of an hour). Mr. Timerson said that the L10 duration is applicable. L50 duration noises refer to constant sounds like that from traffic or machinery. 2. It is very difficult to determine if the L10 decibel level would be violated since the sound source would be from the non - amplified human voice. Voices go up and down whether in play or during normal conversation. Mr. Timerson said that this would, therefore, be very difficult to monitor and evaluate. He said that he doubts, though, that the L10 limit of 65 decibels would be exceeded. 2 3. The best way to control sound in this instance is to limit the activity. The applicant said that the facility would close at 8 p.m: This would eliminate any potential for mid and late evening noises. 4. People sometimes are bothered by noises that are not loud. For example, a mosquito in the room or a faucet dripping while one is try g trying to sleep can be bothersome. Focussing on a noise will make it seem worse for some than it will for others. Fire Chief's Concerns Maplewood Fire Chief, Joel Hewitt, said that the pool should utilize a pelletized chlorine system, not a gaseous system. Gaseous systems can be hazardous in case of a leak. With a gaseous system, a gate would be needed in the back of the fence for escape. The.applicant informed me that they would be using a pelletized system, not gaseous. The applicant should work with Chief Hewitt to meet all public safety requirements. Proposed Overflow Parking Lot Staff's only comment about this proposed parking lot is regarding landscaping. The applicant would remove five trees when they put in the curb cut to the proposed parking lot. These trees were planted by the city as past of the Upper Afton Road improvements in 1990. The applicant should move these trees to the north. side of the proposed parking lot to benefit the street scape and provide Landscaping for the proposed parking lot. Conclusion The aquatic center is a permitted use. Staff feels that the County should comply with the wetland buffer requirements and move the facility to comply with the code. Staff does not favor the county moving the aquatic center closer to the homes to the north, but it would meet code and there would still be 280 feet of wooded buffer between the facility and the neighborhood. COMMITTEE ACTIONS September 8, 1998: The CDRB recommended that the city council approve: 1. A 40 -foot wetland setback variance as a compromise to the applicant's request for an 80 -foot variance. The board felt this would provide an increased wetland buffer over the proposed 20 -foot setback while not moving the proposed facility substantially closer to the neighborhood to the north. 2. The building, site and landscape plans. 3 RECOMMENDATIONS A. Deny the variance request for an 80 -foot encroachment into the required 100- foot -wide wetland- protection buffer around the wetland south of the proposed aquatic facility. Denial is because to approve a variance, state statute requires that the city council determine that strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the ro ert p p Y under consideration. "Undue hardship," as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. The, need for this variance request is created by the landowner in this case. It is not because of circumstances unique to the property. The applicant can place this facility in the ark and meet .city p regulations. Alternate Recommendation (if the city council approves the variance) Adopt the resolution on pages 29 -30 approving an 80 -foot wetland setback variance for the Battle Creek Regional Park Aquatic Facility. Approval is based on the following reasons: 1. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. There would not be any negative impact on the wetland since the Ramsey- Washington Watershed District can assure that proper wetland- protection measures are applied through their review and permitting process. 2. Allowing an 80 -foot wetland -buffer variance would keep the proposed aquatic facility 80 feet further from the homes to the north. 3. The existing wetland buffer is already disturbed due to the encroachment of the picnic grounds and lawn maintenance on the north side of the wetland. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Submitting a grading, drainage and erosion - control plan subject to the approval and .requirements of the city engineer and the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District. No new or untreated drainage emanating from this site shall not be directed into the wetland. 2. Dedicating a wetland -buffer easement for the width of the buffer adjacent to the aquatic facility. This easement shall describe the boundary of the buffer and prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. The applicant shall record the deed for this easement before the city will issue a building permit. (code requirement) 3. Installing wetland buffer signs that prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. (code requirement) 4 B. Approve the plans (stamped August 18, 1998) for the proposed Battle Creek Regional Park Aquatic Facility, -based on the findings required by the code. The property owner, Ramsey County, shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city . has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Provide the following before the city issues grading or building permits for the proposed aquatic facility: a. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan, subject to the city engineer's approval. This plan shall provide at least 100 feet of undisturbed wetland - protection buffer from the adjacent wetland. There shall not be any ground disturbance within this 100 foot buffer. The applicant shall move the placement of the proposed aquatic facility to comply with this requirement. If the city council approves the wetland setback variance, this condition shall be revised to state ". . . provide at least 24 feet of undisturbed wetland- protection buffer. ." b. A revised landscape plan for the overflow parking lot that shows the relocation of the five boulevard trees to be removed for the new curb cut to the north side of the proposed parking lot. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Install a reflectorized stop sign at the exit from the proposed overflow parking lot at Upper Afton Road. b. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure for any outside trash containers, for this facility. (code requirement) The enclosures must by 104 percent opaque, match the color of the building and have a closeable gate that extends to the ground. c. Install all required landscaping. The aquatic facility landscaping shall be provided as proposed on the plan date- stamped September 4, 1998 on file with the department of community development. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200% of the cost of the unfinished work. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 5 CITIZENS' COMMENTS I surveyed the owners of the 60 properties shown on the map on page 13 for their comments about . this proposal. Of the 32 replies, two had no comment and 30 objected to the proposal. Opposed 1. The following is a summary of comments of those who oppose this proposal: a. It is too close to the Crestview Drive neighborhood. It would increase traffic and noise. b. It would disrupt the quiet park. People come to this park to enjoy quiet walks. There is already too much noise from 1 -94. c. This facility would diminish from the beauty of the park which is used for skiing, walking and running. d. Don't develop it at all. e. It would drive away wildlife. Leave this park in its natural state. f. Move this facility to the northeast corner of McKnight Road and Upper Afton Road where it can be patrolled easily and would not be a disturbance to the Crestview Drive neighborhood. Or, move it to the part of the park between Lower and Upper Afton Roads. g. Move it closer to Carver school where they can share parking. h. There are already plenty of pools and swimming beaches nearby. We do not need another. Leave this land natural. I. I think that this will decrease our property value. j. Build the wading pool only, as originally discussed. 2. Refer to the seven letters on pages 15-28. These are from Floyd and Ferris Ashley, John and Colleen Rasmussen (who had included an earlier letter from Warren Robens and Henry Dembiczak ), Warren Roberts and Henry Dembiczak, Gene and Shirley Kulzer, Scott and Tracy Edblom, Fred McCormick and Ronald and Kathleen Schlangen (who included a previous letter from the Neighbors of Battle Creek Park). (attachments 6-12). REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size (project area): Two acres Existing land use: Battle Creek Regional Park SURROUNDING LAND USES (surrounding the proposed facility) North Wooded park property and single dwellings at the south end of Crestview Drive South, (Nest and East: Battle Creek Regional Park property PAST ACTIONS Other Wetland Setback Variance Approvals February 26, 1996: The city council approved a 75 -foot wetland setback variance for Lexus on Highway 61. Code required 100 feet. Lexus was required to provide an "improved, quality" 25 -foot- wide buffer in lieu of the poor - quality 100 -foot -wide buffer that was there. December 9, 1996: The city council approved a 50 -foot wetland setback variance for Maplewood I - mports on Highway 61. Code required an average of a 100 -foot setback from the wetland edge with a minimum of 50 feet. The council allowed Maplewood Imports to build up to the wetland edge. December 9, 1996: The council approved a 60 -foot wetland setback variance for Frank Wienicki of General Sprinkler. Code required 100 feet. April 14 1997: The council approved a 60 -foot wetland setback variance for National Tire and Battery on White Bear Avenue. Code required 100 feet. PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: P and OS (park and open space) Zoning: F (farm residence district) Ordinance Requirements Section 25 -70 of the City Code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. FA 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the City's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is esthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 9- 196(h )(3) requires a 100-foot-wide, no- disturb, wetland - protection buffer around Class 1 wetlands. Findings for Variance Approval State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance from the zoning code: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship," as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and, the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. p:sec4- 28\aquatic.3 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line2oning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Letter from Greg Mack of Ramsey County dated August 31, 1998 5. Neighborhood Notification Map 6. Letter from Floyd and Ferris Ashley 7. Letter from John and Colleen Rasmussen (with previous letter from H. Dembiczak and W. Robens) 8. Letter from Henry Dembiczak and Warren Robens 9. Letter from Gene and Shirley Kuizer 10. Letter from Scott and Tracy Edblom 11. Letter from Fred McCormick 12. Letter from Ronald and Kathleen Schlangen (with previous letter from Neighbors of Battle Creek Park) 13. Variance Resolution 14. Plans date - stamped August 18,1998 (separate attachment) Attachment 1 UJI al MINNEHAHA AVE. j �i MARGARET AVE. N Sth W AVE. Lykes 255 250 a z FREM O 7 o ° o: n � 275 261 N AVE. CONWAY AVE. ° FRON TALE R0, Cog L ..... 13 1 • 209 1011 m 240 236 Q CC rM 247 N N M N ♦ � N N 234 2020 Tvnners yV 222 ON RQ • Lake HU DSON PL. V5 i ,E i MAYER LN. CREEK ROPQS . E : D JAMES W DR. i c~i> ; AQUATIC EK (wn ARE K t Y' W cn _j _, FACILITY ljtj,p P� o Z w J REG� Pork v Q; W UPPER AFTON fM. PROPOSED PARKING LOT CRO . gp►�� PA RED ' I LONDON CT. 2 POND CT. 3 DORLAND LN. 4 DORLAND DR. LOWER 5 DORLAND RD. 7 MAI AND CT. IS OORI,ANa CT. JgAA COVIVTY CORR£CMNAL Q Ei • LN. FACILITY LONDIN. HIG a�.' * OND + 3 `�ti► W � �' O'DAY �, cn 2q 5 " LN. P,p� A o a a� 7 KING AV �.• 0 QAY L LOCATION MAP 9 4 N Attachment 2 _ c � (30 • i' semi t .6 ti. , Now J N f • A Q o oc z� , ► - - ---{ -P P" -T- - - -, -- - - - - f���� PROPOSED , SPARKING LOT oc oI lap I(- 4e23.44 475 580 33.3 �� I •• ' ,t F-5) W N, I COUNTY OF RAMSEY - OPEN SPAC l r g PROPOSED AQUATIC FACILITY i f 31G PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 10 4 N Attachment 3 Ap F- 2 t� Z Y v 1 PROPOSED A PARKING LOT SITE -PLAN BATTLE CREEK REGIONAL PARK Ir ii de EXISTING PICNIC , t , r , , ,��� , ,.�,�, AQUATIC AND PARKING LOT , , , f itpu FACILITY A No 0 Ito J) IL 10 Io 010 ! t IDEMP eI:TnN Qnen 4 N 11 AS Ap F- 2 t� Z Y v 1 PROPOSED A PARKING LOT SITE -PLAN BATTLE CREEK REGIONAL PARK Ir ii de EXISTING PICNIC , t , r , , ,��� , ,.�,�, AQUATIC AND PARKING LOT , , , f itpu FACILITY A No 0 Ito J) IL 10 Io 010 ! t IDEMP eI:TnN Qnen 4 N 11 Attachment 4 Y � G � wy R� RAMSEY COUNTY Parks and Recreation Department Gregory A. Mack, Director 2015 N. Van Dyke Street Maplewood, MN 55109 -3796 August 31, 1998 Tel: 651 - 748 -2500 Fax: 651 -748 -2508 fit Mr. Tom Ek s t rand' Planner AUG 1 ' 1 1. City of Maplewood ' 18-30 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 '��'-- -•- ~ • V RE Battle Creek Regional Park Water Recreation Area Dear Mr. Ekstrand: I understand from your review that a portion of the proposed water recreation area lies within the 100 -foot wetland buffer area established by the Maplewood Building Code. Ramsey County has positioned the proposed improvement in close proximity to the wetland in response to the expressed interest of adjacent property owners to maximize the distance between their homes and the proposed improvement. Accordingly, Ramsey County requests an 80 -foot variance from the city of Maplewood in order to accommodate the interests of adjacent property owners. The alternative for Ramsey County would be to shift the facility to the north, outside of the 10 wetland buffer and, therefore, closer to the adjacent property owners. Grading will occur 20 feet from the wetland, however, permanent facilities will be 55 feet from the wetland. Ramsey County believes that granting the variance will have no negative impact on the existing wetland. Thank you for consideration of this variance request. me know if you need additional information. Sinc ely, Gregory A. qk Director cAM /cj 12 Please let Minnesota's First Home Rule County printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10% post - consumer content AFSCME Attachment 5 N E BATTLE CREEK PARK AREA PIN LIST s HWY 914 Attachment 6 am. in favor of this proposal because have no comment. I object to this proposal because ' If you object, describe below or draw on the enclosed map any changes that would make this application acceptable. If no changes would make it acce table, how should this � j property be developed? - (County Aquatic Facility) (Section 1 -28) �-�e. M ,Q Ctc.� -e�L�� 7Z���� .4000 r OH 14 •4 sh �e� M . APLEWOOD 1 Together We Can JOHN M RASMUSSEN COLLEEN M RASMUSSEN 212 CRESTVIEW DRIVE N MAPLEWOOD MN 55119 -4708 _..— _ -- A t t a c h m e n t 7_ F f , s s 6 August 24, 1998 NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY Thl� C t �c��' Yoe �r n�+i nn ;;n ar�r��ir'a ion the r'l.ty has. �'�Cc:O`:$� fir nrnnrv.f in your _V �i w • ors 1 • • . .... - • w neighborhood. borhood Ramsey ount Parks and Recreation Department is requesting approval of site Y Y and building design plans for a proposed aquatic facility. This facility will have swimming and activit Yp ools, and a sand play area. There would be a concrete block building for changing rooms concessions, and an Office. The county is also proposing an overflow parking lot on the south side of Upper Afton. Road. I need your opinion to help me prepare a recommendation to the planning commission and city council. Please write your opinion and comments below. Return only this cover letter (and any attachments on which you have written comments) to me in the enclosed postage -paid envelope by September 3, 1998. If you would like further information, please call me at 770 -4563 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. I will send you a notice of any public. hearings on this application.. Thank you for your comments. will give them careful ideration:l HOMAS EKSTRAND - ASSOCIATE PLANNER pf Enclosures am in favor of this proposal because have no comment. a - I object to this proposal because _per A 1.5.5ues / S 417 A 14 9 If y ou describe below or draw on the enclosed map any changes that would make this ap acceptable. If no changes would make It acceptable, how should this property be developed? (County Aquatic Facility) (Section 1 -28) 15 st,41r klF / o OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 612.770.4560 MAPLEWOOD, MN 85109 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1 830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B Juno e -mail printed Thu, 21 May 199812:47 :48 page 1 From: Dembi Full- Name: Henry P Dembiczak To: Tony. Ben nett@co. ramsey. rn n. us, Di no.Guedn @co. rmsey. m n. us, Susan. M. Haigh @co. ramsey. mn. us, Rafael.Ortega@co. ramsey. mn. us, Victoria. Reinhardt@co. ramsey. mn. us, Janice. Rettman @co. ramsey. mn. us, Jan.Wiessner@co.ramsey.mn.us Cc: Terry.SchuttenCco. ramsey. mn. us Subject: Water Paris in Ramsey County Regional Park X- Status: Unsent May 21, 1998 Dear Commissioners: We request a compassionate review of your decision�taJoaatethe 9 Battle Creek Regional Park Water Recreation Area in the s= ion. Sound control* cannot be achieved by banning. It is much too T OUf backyards and will flood our area with noise ' s enjoying the slide. It is not necessary to be at site C wh note B i the requirements so well and doesn't infringe on our use an ent of our yards 8 homes. It doesn't make sense to put this facility so clo to our backyards when there is so much space available away from resi es. We are already at the unacceptable sound level density due, to the 194 Freeway and will exceed it when the widening takes place in 2002 or so. .ti-- Our homes will be subject to the same problems that plague the airport There is adequate space beside the entry to the site C parking � lot due south of the lot by the picnic shatter. R looks like the oaks !` have oak wilt and some are dead or dying anyhow. If there is concern to save -them immediate attention should be given to their root connections. There also are areas to the West of the parking lot between the lot and wetland that could supply the needed space and give us the separation we desire -if the will is there to meet our objections. The people on North Crestview Drive were shocked to hear about two weeks ago a water park was to be built in our backyards. We had not been advised so we could represent our interests. We had cooperated with the commission when the park was developed and your group moved the pavilion away and termed it to reduce sound levels. The pavilion was said to be the end of development it has not been a major sound problem except when band concerts or cross country races take place -but these are infrequent events. The park has not been trouble free for us. People urinate behind bushes thinking others cannot see them. They are incorrect about that and may just not care. We've had people . having sex across from our home on Labor Day when there were a lot of families in the park. Kids have crossed the creek and vandalized our yard. Our neighbor lady was surprised by a male in her garden. We feel a facility like this so close to our property will increase the probability of this kind of problems. We don't think its fair to saddle us with the Water Park neighbors did not want by moving it to site C. Site B will not impact us like site C will. We hug our trees and wild life too. WeYe planted areas to control erosion and feed ducks to keep them in the area. We pet lots of wood ducks. Your decision may well ruin our enjoyment of our yards. Haw do you plan to police the area to control the people coming to the park? Some neighbors have had picnickers in their backyarcl. Young kids. play in the creek - usually without problems. Unfortunately many Young teens come through the area cursing and throwing rocks at the wildlife. The proposed water park is quite close to our backyards and 16 Juno e-mai 0 1 printed Thu, 21 Ma 19 81 2:47:48 9 pop 2 cannot be bermed accordin to Lwr Holmbe The &-- U_ I 1-h w I field noise comin ftm the East ed of ft park Is q uite nodomble and is much further astw than the proposed water park. The w atier park should be much further awa from us so our oukk space can be en free from a ma noise source. WVII be flooded with no!" from this facilit in addition to noise we alread g ot from 1.94 to 'the north. The site B I fion is much preferred b the neighb I There are • also locations In the park to the south of the pavi 'lion and also to the west which seem ade for the proposed fa 6111ty.Were not anti Water Park, we j ust don't want it overwhelmin our space . when suitable area is available that Will not impact us so severel You ma bred of discussin this p l ed b ut we're the ones who will have do live with project the conse as lon as we INFO here. Please show us some understandin for our situation. Please advise us y our response to our concerns. Sinc Warren Robens Henry Dembiczak 140 N. Crestview Dr. Maplewood, IVIN 55119 Tel. # 739-5996 E-mail address: Dembi 17 Attachment 3 August 31, 1998 To Thomas Ekstrand We object to this pro* poal because we don't feel the facility is needed. There are other water`recreation facilities nearby at Carver Lake, Tanners Lake, Washington County Reserve Park, Lake Phalen, and the Maplewood Community Center. This facility will be used only a couple months whereas the Maplewood Community Center facility can be used year around. Furthermore, the Maplewood facility is losing money. Why spend more money for an unneeded facility. The installation is beside a slough filled with mosquitoes. and mosquito borne diseases will have a fertile source of blood to work on. We understand there is a type of encephalitis spread by mosquitos. We also understand there is no defined plan to control water purity and fecal colifoim. This type of facility is out of character for the area where it is proposed. The water slide is an amusement park type structure and doesn't belong in a quiet wilderness type area. Earlier a proposed swimming pool near McKnight between Upper and Lower Afton Roads was cancelled . because it would destroy a wilderness area. This proposal will do the same flung. We do not oppose a wading pool which would fit in with other existing children activity facilities. If the facility must be built why put it so close to residences when there is so much acreage in the park where it would not impact residences. If it must be built in the proposed site it should be moved further south so it will be fiuther away from people's homes. In addition sound bamiera should be included in the plan to assure a lower level of sound pollution can be assured. We understand newer proposals will do this. ►S11tC6fCly, Henry Dembiczak Warren Robens 140 Crestview Dr. Maplewood, MN 55119 W MAPLEWOOD Together We Can GENE T & SHIRLEY M KULZER 152 CRESTVIEW DRIVE MAPLEWOOD MN 55119 -4778 Attachment 9' 4 ' s a f � i August 24; 1998 NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY This is to get your opinion on an ap bcation the city has received for proprety in your neighborhood. Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department is requesting approval of site and building design plans for a proposed aquatic facility. This facility will have swimming and activity pools, and a sand play area. There would be a concrete block building for changing rooms, concessions, and an office. The county is also proposing an overflow parking lot on the south side of Upper Afton Road. I need your opinion to help me prepare a recommendation to the planning commission and city council. Please write your opinion and comments below. Return only this cover letter (and any attachments on which you have written comments) to me in the enclosed postage -paid envelope by September 3, 1998. If you would like further information, please call me at 770 -4563 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. I will send you a notice of any public hearings on this application. Thank you for your comments. will give them careful ideration: T HOMAS EKSTRAND - ASSOCIATE PLANNER pf Enclosures am in favor of this proposal because have no comment. object to this proposal becauseC���'''�"s If you object, describe .below or draw on the enclosed map any changes that would make this application acceptable. If no changes would make it acceptabl how should this property be developed? rf flog✓' �yr� s TE" .S/'E'•rT � e�t. ?7is T'T�� of Fia1G -1 T y' !'T' .5�� v �-� �� .L a cw-7Z2) A 7- 317 ` �.` of 7zp jar (County Aquatic Facility) (Section 1 -28) �--- © © �Lp 8� dc777 ;e- � Pe,,,rp s ♦ •rte �-,�'�" Spew T ;P L' L 4er4 ev'r` t�3 13 Yo CO30 vSi�4F OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 612 CITY of MAPLEWOOD 1 830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 19 ��C C T/ ; jj� v� Ooe S r�T ✓�c'�J � vim" � NL /lc� was i✓� � c r �i rrC � if ego;? 72r A AO 770' 1,S•G z/�l Ty Cow c�c.�S fox. ����s����- l o?e l Af#4 W y O o f -7 *Ar of C 4, /�� Pa4P�C� GAG rrl .¢• D v�,dj�- v �-. �,� �✓'�i Esc l�lt�O'�� �G � L� 7y of <o / , 0 , C ie Z-e 7-100 �3G �oc�L 4 /LG. 20 f 0 ..Q 0 1 � V ? i� 1 1 1�f � 11 t i♦ A l � � I i. I 1 ►ti %ij'� 1 1 1 1 dop de wommmawANI EXISTING = %; %;; ► �, PICNIC SHELTER ROPOSE AND PARKING L ' ' �;';�� ;',l ;i AQUA ' ; , \ � , TIC QT FACILITY \� •_= l IpPER AFTON ROAD o t 1 A or ... v PROPOSED PARKING LOT SITE - PLAN BATTLE CREEK REGIONAL PARK 4 N 21 Attachment 10 August 31, 1998 We are opposed to this proposal for the following reasons: The threat of pollution into the creek and ponds as this facility is only 200 yards from the creek. Harmful chemicals could leak into the creek and pond waters. The destruction of a mature forest to put in a concrete building and pool facility. Maplewood and the state of Minnesota have lost many trees this summer do to storms. Why Must you cut down acres of trees to put in a pool facility which would benefit from being placed in open space? The facility is too, close to existing residential areas. Noise and trespassing barriers are not planned for in this proposal. Private property will be trespassed on and destroyed. The noise will continue into the evening disturbing neighbors. The project will not sustain itself. Maplewood taxpayers will have to pay for ongoing upkeep and maintenance along with services such as police and fire. The pool will only be open 3 months out of the year. The $2.1 million that is going to be spent on this project could go to other much needed services that would be available 12 months of the year. Sincerely, ilciA I -s Scott W. Edblom Traci M. Edblom 22 Attachment 11 TO: Thomas Ekstra.nd FRAM: Fred. B. McCormick 230 Crestview Drive North. Maplewood., MN 55119 - 4.708 SUBJECT: Att to County Aqu atic Facility Neighborhood. Survey DATE: Septexr,�ber. 3, x.998 I object to this proposal for the aquatic facility proposed for Battle Creek Regional,.'ark. It wiJI bring unacceptable noise Levels to Crestview Drive North. and the noise will be especi.a l.y objectionable for the southern. s.ection of ou street. There wiH likely be added. traffic (car and. foot) f rom. pe trying to access the park through, our dead end siTeet. A large "NO PARK ACCESS sign would be required at the north end of the street. 11)el.i:eve th.e facility is also incon-sistent w itl the cha.ra.cter, of the rest of the park. An. a - m.usem.en.t park attra.ct:ion, does not belong in. a, site full of ponds, strea.m. s, woods, I1ikin. g trails, a,nd, picnic a rea.s. Par will be a. pr. oblem,. 'T'h.e existing lot of ten �s seen� too small, especially on. weekends, and the proposed overflow parking is located, too far from tl f a.cilRy. Your sur vey le tter, does not men don. a water slide and. states that there w ill be a s wim.m. in g area Unless the Ramsey County parks anal Recreation . Department has changed th.el.r. pla th.Ere w!J.l be a. 160 linear foot water slide and no swi mming area. I.f the water slide has been. eli , ated an.d. the plan. *16 for a more "traditional" sw7,m. ni.ing pool, then. the facility becomes much Less objectionable. 1-1owever., the proposed st.te is still too close to Cr estview Drive. Tb.e sate is qut.te wooded and. rather. sloped. There should not be any development of. this site. An. alternative would be to place f11e entire f a.cifity at the south.ea.st corner. of McKnight and Upper Afton. roads. This site is flat anal, covered. with what looks like inconsequential scrub growth.. The p ar king lot should. be placed at the co ...er. of McKnight and Upper Afton. with. car access from bo0i, roads. The existing asphalt tra�.l.s g should. be relocated as needed.. The a qu atic facility, with or without the wat slide, slaould be placed, approxi.m.a.tely where the proposed over paxkin.g lot is looted. ors. tb,e Site Plan. Map. This will. place th.e fa.cil.i.i.v as far away as possible from. any houses in. the neighborhood. Since the new parking lot wil.1. be very con.v for people wishJ.ng to use the trails between. Upper. and I✓ower. Afto roads, it m�.ght be wise to ma.ltc ff larger than. th.c one i.n, tli.e current proposal.. The cha.ra.cter of the park wf be p re served and. th.er. wi be minixn.al impact on. the R amsey County Open. Space south p p Y O f LIpp Af ton. road.. If an. aquatic f acility must be built, this compromise solu.ti,on merits strong considera 23 Attachment 12 Ronald and Kathleen Schlangen 130 Crestview Drive Maplewood, MN 55119 612 -739 -5537 September 1, 1998 Thomas Ekstrand Associate Planner Office of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Water Park in Battle Creek Regional Park Neighborhood Survey Dear Mr. Ekstrand, Thank you for sending us the neighborhood survey regarding the proposed aquatic facility. We vigorously object to the proposal. We think that it should not be built at all. But if it is .to be built anyway, we certainly think that it should not be built so close to our back yard. We have communicated these and other objections to the Ramsey County Board, and have sent copies to Maplewood city officials. Although you most likely have seen it, I am enclosing a copy of the most recent letter we sent to the Ramsey County Board. As we have said before,. anything the City of Maplwood can do to derail, discourage or delay this project would be most appreciated. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Ronald and Kathleen Schlangei,- 24 Neighbors of Battle Creek Park c/o Ronald and Kathleen Schlangen 130 Crestview Drive Maplewood, N N 55119 612 -739 -5537 Commissioners Victoria Reinhardt Tony Bennett Dino Guerin Sue Haigh Rafael Ortega Janice Rettman Jan Wiessner Board of Ramsey County Commissioners 220 Court House 15 West Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55102 RE: Water Park in Battle Creek Regional Park Board Resolution 97 -518 Dear Commissioner Reinhardt, et al., COPY July 10, 1998 Thank you for allowing our group to be heard during the July 14th meeting of the Physical Resources Committee. Our group has little experience in presenting concerns before a governmental body, and we only have 20 minutes of the Committee's time. As a courtesy to the Board and to make sure we cover our main points, we are putting our thoughts in letter form, in advance of our appearance before the Committee. On Tuesday, June 30th, about 40 "Neighbors of Battle Creek Park" held a meeting at Carver School to discuss the issues of the construction and location of the water park in Battle Creek .Regional Park. Our group expressed two overriding sentiments: 1. "Don't build it at all." and 2. "If you are going to build it despite our objections, don't put it so close to Battle Creek." We are asking the County Board either to: 1. Abandon the project; 2. Move the water park from P ts proposed location; 3. Delay construction for further study. These are some of the issues raised at the meeting: A. Why build a water recreation area at all? 1. Where is the justification for spending taxpayer dollars? We have been told that the water recreation area was called for in "The Master Plan" for Battle Creek Regional Park. The Master Plan is 17 years old. Why assume that this is still necessary or desired? In the face of all the opposition to the water park, why follow a master plan that may be no longer appropriate. We would propose a delay in construction so that a study could be conducted to determine if this facility is really needed or wanted, and if so, is the proposed location really the best place for it. 2. Why do we need another water park? Our tax dollars already support the Maplewood Community Center which has a pool and water slide. Tanner's Lake beach is 1 mile away, Carver Lake beach is only about 3 miles away. Furthermore, the City of Maplewood is considering building a wading pool near Carver School. 25 3. The Metropolitan Council is funding this project with a two million dollar grant. Is this the best use of two million dollars? It seems that the main justification for going ahead with this project is the fear of losing out on future grant money if you don't spend it. It doesn't seem to matter if the project is necessary or desirable or wanted; what does seem to matter is "spend it or, lose it." This money doesn't really come from the Metropolitan Council; it comes from us, the taxpayers. The taxpayers have elected you, the County Board, to spend our taxpayer dollars wisely and appropriately. That is your public trust. Don't spend our dollars on something we don't want or need. 4. We also understand that this facility will not generate enough revenue to sustain itself. Why not charge what it costs? Additional tax dollars will have to be spent for operational, maintenance, and security costs. It seems you could save the taxpayers of Ramsey County a lot of money by simply not building this facility. B. Why build a Water Park? 1. Why a water park instead of a wading pool? The Parks and Recreation Department conducted a completely non - scientific survey of 56 individuals in Battle Creek playground, 4 blocks away. People were stopped and asked if they would like a water park and if they would use it. To use this as justification for building a water park 4 blocks away is incredible. The people were apparently not asked if they thought that spending two million dollars on a water park was a good idea, or if two million dollars could be better spent on something else. Nor were they asked where such a facility should be built. 2. Who is going to use it? Commissioner Reinhardt has told us that this water park was designed for families. The initial design shown in Board Resolution 97 -518 called only for a wading pool and a flume slide. Two other areas, a deep drop slide and an activity pool, were denoted as "future" and were to depend on future funding. 3. However, the plan being considered now also contains a water walk, and an area for water volleyball and water basketball. These are noise generators, designed for older kids, with exuberant, loud voices, competing to see who can make the biggest splash and scream the loudest. - Volleyball and basketball are contests, and contests generate noise; yelling, screaming, arguing and swearing. Next to a wading pool. If you insist on building this water park in the proposed location, please delete the volleyball and basketball areas. 4. The plan also contains a provision for a "deep drop slide ", depending on future funding. This is a noise generator in the extreme. If you insist on building a water park, please delete this deep drop slide from any future development. C. Why build it so close to a residential area? 1. You propose to build this water park within 200 feet of the middle of Battle Creek. Battle Creek flows behind the homes of three of the residents of Crestview Drive. Would you like such a facility located 200 - 300 feet from your back yard? This is not a "NIMBY" issue. Acccording to the Metropolitan Council's web site, Battle Creek Regional Park contains some 1,840 acres of park land. The water park doesn't have to be in anyone's back yard. 2. The original plan called for the water recreation area to be built south of Upper Afton Road. From the August issue of "District 1 News ", it was apparent that at various hearings held regarding the water recreation area, the majority of speakers did not want it built at all. The County Board decided to go ahead with the project, but not to build it on the south side of Upper Afton Road. 26 3. In the September issue of "District 1 News ", Commissioner Guerin wrote that he and Parks and Recreation Director Greg Mack found an "alternate site" for the water park. Unfortunately for the residents of Crestview Drive, that "alternative site is within 200 feet of the middle of Battle Creek, which quite. literally flows in the back yards of some of the residents of Crestview Drive. No notice of this selection was given to the residents of Crestview Drive. 4. Two scenarios are possible. (a) Commissioner Guerin and Mr. Mack did not know that the location was so close to a residential area. (b) They did know that it was so close, and decided to proceed anyway, without regard for the serious impact on nearby residents. Did the other Commissioners know the proposed location was so close? We don't believe so. If they did know, we do not believe they would have voted for the proposed location. In any event, we think a mistake was made. We are asking the County Board to rectify this error. We are asking you to do what's right. 5. In the County Board Resolution approving the "alternate site ", one of the drawbacks listed is that "Residents in the area who are unaffected by options A and B may be opposed to adding activity to the developed picnic area of the park." We are opposed; not that anyone asked us, or even let us know that this was being considered! Other residents had opportunity to protest the site south of Upper Afton Road. we did not have the opportunity to voice our concerns about the current proposed location. 6. It has been suggested that an earthen berm on the north side of the facility would deaden the sound of the water park. It would not. The elevation of the residences on Crestview Drive are at least 20 -25 feet higher than the elevation of the proposed location of the water park. A berm would have to be at least that high to be effective. 7. If you are going to build this water park anyway, despite our valid concerns, please move it further south from the residential area of Crestview Drive. We suggest that you put it where option B would have been located, or simply move the park closer to Upper Afton road, south and east of the wetlands. This will give a larger noise buffer for the residents of Crestview Drive, and it still will not be any closer to anyone else's back yard. D. other issues. 1. You have decided to locate it north of Upper Afton Road because enough people raised "environmental concerns" about a south side placement. Ironically, despite those environmental concerns, you decided it was still okay to build a 150 car parking lot on the south side of the road to handle overflow parking. 2. Safety. You have separated the parking lot from the park by a very busy road, where posted speed limits are routinely ignored, especially coming down the hill traveling westbound. What will you say to the parents of the first child who is killed crossing Upper Afton to get to the water park or playground; the first child who excitedly breaks away from her parents and runs into the road and is killed. 3. After -hours security. The proposed plan is surrounded on three sides by hills and woods. As such, it will not be possible to provide adequate perimeter security to prevent vandalism. This will increase maintenance costs. For security, the option B site would be a better suited. Furthermore, if security personnel do interrupt after hours vandalism, the perpetrators will not scatter into the open area of the park; they will scatter back into the trees and into the surrounding neighborhoods where more vandalism is likely. 4. Who provides after hours security? Ramsey County or Maplewood. If the nearby residents call to report a problem, who do we call, and who will respond? 27 5. Hours of operation. We understand that the current plans call for hours of operation from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. If this facility is built in the proposed location, we would like assurances that those hours will not be expanded in the future. E. Summary. 1. We would rather that Battle Creek Park be left. as it is. We prefer the natural feel of the walking park, where we can seek refuge from the no and stress of everyday living, where we can see the occasional deer and hear, the call of the blackbird. We don't need more noise, we need more quiet. 2. Before proceeding with the project, we believe that the County should undertake thorough study to determine whether the park is really needed or wanted by the residents. 3. If you are going to build it anyway: (a) Locate the water park closer to Upper Afton Road to provide a greater sound buffer. (b) Delete the "deep -drop slide" from the project. (c) Delete the water volleyball and water basketball areas from the project. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, The Neighbors of Battle Creek Park c/o Ronald and Kathleen Schlangen Copies: Members of the Metropolitan Council Maplewood Mayor George Rossbach Members of the Maplewood City Council 28 Attachment 13 WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK VARIANCE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Department of Parks and Recreation applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance. WHEREAS, this variance applies to Battle Creek Regional Park at the northeast corner of McKnight Road and Upper Afton Road. The legal description is: PART OF E %2 OF NW 1/4 SLY OF CL OF BATTLE CREEK; EX S 1150 FT OF E 700 FT THEREOF (SUBJ TO RDS & ESMTS) IN SEC 1 TN 28 RN 22 WHEREAS, Section 38- 196(h)(3) of the wetland protection ordinance requires a 100- foot -wide, no- disturb, wetland - protection buffer around Class 1 wetlands. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 20- foot -wide wetland buffer. WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 80 feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1. On September 8, 1998, the community design review board recommended that the city council approve a variance allowing a 40 foot encroachment into the wetland buffer area. 2. The city council held a public hearing on September 28, 1998. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described variance for the following reasons: Approval is based on the following reasons: 1. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. There would not be any negative impact on the wetland since the Ramsey - Washington Watershed District can assure that proper wetland- protection measures are applied through their review and permitting process. 2. Allowing an 80 -foot wetland -buffer variance would keep the proposed aquatic facility 80 feet further from the homes to the north. 3. The existing wetland buffer is already disturbed due to the encroachment of the picnic grounds and lawn maintenance on the north side of the wetland. 29 Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Submitting a grading, drainage and erosion- control plan subject to the approval and requirements of the city engineer and the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District. No new or untreated drainage emanating from this site shall not be directed into the wetland. 2. Dedicating a wetland- buffer easement for the width of the buffer adjacent to the aquatic facility. This easement shall describe the boundary of the buffer and prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. The applicant shall record the deed for this easement before the city will issue a building permit. (code requirement) 3. installing wetland buffer signs that prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. (code requirement) The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 1998. 30 MAP LEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 8, 1998 C. Battle Creek Regional Park Aquatic Facility, Upper Afton Road and McKnight Road - Ramsey County Boardmember Erickson stated, for the audience's benefit, that the community design review board makes recommendations to the city council on the design of the building only. The board will also be addressing the wetland variance issue. Greg Mack, director of parks and recreation for Ramsey County, Steve Patrick, who is with the architectural firm that prepared the building plans, and Larry Holmberg of Ramsey County's staff, who is a landscape architect, were present. Mr. Mack gave some background on Battle Creek Regional Park. Mr. Mack said one of the elements within the master plan of the regional park was to provide a water recreation area and since 1996 they have been working on various designs for this. The plan they have come up with is a one and a half acre site that is made up of three components which are as follows: a sand play component, an interactive water play component, and a water slide component and each would flow into a different pond. Boardmember Erickson asked if the sand play component had a fence around it. Mr. Mack said that it would have an exterior fence and an interior fence around it. Mr. Mack said the entry control into this area is a building which houses a shower facility, a changing area, a bather prep, a lifeguard station, restrooms, and a small office for fee collection. There would be fencing around the entire complex and access would be through the central corridor. This building would also house all of the water circulation and purification systems. This aquatic facility would be constructed next to and take advantage of an existing 275 car parking lot that is in the park, and in addition to that, they are proposing to construct a 150 car overfill parking lot that would be on the south side of Upper Afton Road, with a connecting trail for peak use of the facility and picnic area. Boardmember Ledvina asked if there had been any effort to coordinate the design of the building with the existing pavilion. Mr. Patrick said there wasn't because they are totally separate structures. Mr. Mack said they have been looking at bringing the two together with a roof system. Community Design Review Board -7- Minutes.of 09 -08 -98 Mr. Holmberg used a map to show the location of the proposed facility to the existing facilities within the site, the adjacent properties, and the parking lot on the south side of Upper Afton. Mr. Holmberg then discussed the wetland setbacks from the development's fenced area which is 55 feet and from the corner of the parking lot which is 70 feet. Boardmember Robinson asked if there had been any consideration of having a crosswalk over Upper Afton for safety purposes. Mr. Holmberg said that because it is flat on both sides in relation to the road people would walk across the road and not use the bridge because of having to use steps or a ramp to get up on the bridge. Mr. Holmberg said it would also be difficult and costly to put handicap accessible ramps on the bridge. Mr. Holmberg felt that a crosswalk would be acceptable because the traffic volumes on Upper Afton Road were not very high. Boardmember Erickson asked if, being the park is 840 acres, there was .a place on the south side where the facility could be put. Mr. Mack said the original proposal was to have the facility south of Upper Afton Road but, after considerable review, the County Board felt that the natural part of the park area should be left alone and they opted to move the facility to the north where there was already developed activity and where there was an existing parking lot that could be taken advantage of. Mr. Mack said. they took it to the Metropolitan Council and they accepted the amendment of the relocation. Boardmember Erickson asked if there was anyplace on the north side of Upper Afton Road going west where the facility could be put that wouldn't impact the wetland. Mr. Holmberg said that were problems with flooding in this area during heavy rainfalls because of how the flow of Battle Creek is distributed. There was a further discussion about drainage into the wetland. Boardmember Erickson asked staff if the Corp of Engineers gets involved with this. Staff said that by the city's definition it is a class one wetland but the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District is the body that will review the drainage elements. Staff said it is the city code that specifies what the setback has to be. Boardmember Erickson asked if there was exterior lighting on the building. Mr. Mack said there was exterior lighting for security purposes only, with down lighting under the soffits. Boardmember Erickson asked what the hours of operation would be. Mr. Mack said it would be similar to their beach operations, which are Memorial Day to Labor Day and from 11:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. Boardmember Robinson asked how many of the facility's staff would require parking. Mr. Mack said it would be between five and ten. Mr. Mack had comments on the recommendations in the staff report. Mr. Mack said that, regarding Item A of the staff report, they hoped the board would give consideration to their variance request because of the hardship it would cause their Community Design Review Board -800 Minutes of 09 -08 -98 construction if they had to move farther to the north. Mr. Mack added that once they completed construction the 55 -foot buffer that would remain would be a fence buffer with very little opportunity to ever get in that area, so it would be controlled access in that space. Mr. Mack said that under Item B.3.c. it talks about dedicating a wetland buffer zone. Mr. Mack said if the city council grants the variance then the zone would be somewhat less than 100 feet. There are several wetlands throughout Battle Creek Regional Park and to impose this kind of a transfer of rights to the city seems a little bit extraordinary. Mr. Mack said that they are in the business of parks, there are ponds all over, and several class one wetlands. In this case, Mr. Mack, said if the variance was not granted the city would be asking them to give the city a recorded easement over an area they are not even impacting. Mr. Mack said that, as far as Item B.3.d. goes, once the level is established they would feel comfortable with putting up signs if the city thinks that would be necessary for maintaining the distance. Mr. Mack said they could put up signs that would say keep back or don't mow, etc. Mr. Mack said they currently have a parking lot that is within 70 feet of the wetland and they are currently maintaining a mowed picnic area which is within 30 feet of the wetland. If there was no variance granted it would be difficult for them just maintaining the current operation. Mr. Mack said they accept all the other staff recommendations as stated and would like to proceed with the project. Boardmember Erickson asked staff, in regard to Items B.3.c. and d., that if the facility is built there when the city council grants the variance would these things then have to take place. Staff said yes and that, even if the council was to deny the variance and required the shifting of the building to meet the 100 -foot buffer, the city would still want the wetland buffer signs put up which is what the code requires. Mr. Mack wanted to know why there weren't wetland easements for the other wetlands in the park. Melinda Coleman, Director of Community Development, said the reason the city didn't have wetland easements up all over was because the ordinance was recently adopted, so the city is catching up and getting wetland easements as development projects come in. Mrs. Coleman said Mr. Mack had raised a good issue about requiring another .public agency to give the city an easement and she was going to run that by the city attorney between now and the time this goes to council. Boardmember Erickson opened up the discussion for the public to be heard. Gary Sherburne, 137 Crestview Drive, said he was there representing the neighborhood and that their greatest concern was the noise that would be generated by this type of facility. Mr. Sherburne brought a boom box and a tape with background noise of the nature that would be generated by this kind of a facility and said he could play it for the board. Mr. Sherburne also had a sound level meter with him. Mr. Sherburne said that the level of noise which had been measured at the fence of a similar facility was 65 decibels. Mr. Sherburne said they are requesting Community Design. Review Board -9- Minutes of 09 -08 -98 that a sound barrier wall be put around the facility rather than the chainlink fence that is proposed and that there be design elements within the facility to dampen the sound as much as possible. Mr..Sherburne said that as far as the wetland setback variance is concerned they would all be in support of the variance to keep the facility as far south as possible. He said that an extra 80 -feet closer would be disastrous and would push the noise level up a couple of more decibels. Tom Ekstrand, associate planner, said he had talked to Brian Timerson at the PCA Noise Division and Brian did say that it is very hard to measure the decibel level of a human voice. Mr. Timerson had said that he didn't feel this would be a problem based on what he knew of this type of noise and he didn't think the noise level of 65 decibels would be exceeded. Mr. Ekstrand said that what he was hearing tonight was that the noise level right at the edge of the facility was. 65 decibels, therefore, if you took that back the length of a football field there shouldn't be any noise violation occurring at the homes, which confirms what Mr. Timerson said. Hank Dembiczak, 140 Crestivew Drive, said that one of the things that has been noted at similar facilities is that amplification is being used to control the activities and it gets very loud, much more than the 65 decibels. Mr. Mack said they do put amplifiers into their buildings that they use for announcements that are necessary. Mr. Mack did say they have been working on better ways to manage the noise levels at their various beach facilities. This summer they started using the old type of amplification of paper and plastic, instead of the more noisy hand held battery operated megaphones. There was a discussion about a sound barrier for this area. Mr. Dembiczak said that, in answer to Mr. Mack's comment about a sound barrier being unattractive and out of character for this area, he feels the water slide is unattractive and out of character for this area. Jean Ashley, 2466 Brookview Drive, said that the real reason this facility wasn't being built on Site B was because all the residents in that area really put up a fuss. There were several large meetings that were packed with people who didn't want it at all and there was enough pressure put on the commissioners that the project there was stopped. She said Mr. Mack asked people at the final meeting if anyone would object to a wading pool in the north side of the park. Nobody had a problem with a wading pool. He didn't say anything about a water park at that time and had he, there would have been another fuss. Lee. Kuhn, 2481 Brookview Drive, said he had thanked staff for the letter notifying him of the meeting tonight. Mr. Kuhn said if they had letters leading up to this thing it probably would have never gotten to this stage. Mr. Kuhn said that if.granting the variance hinders the project he would urge the board to do so. Community Design Review Board -10- Minutes of 09 -08 -98 r Fred McCormick, 230 Crestview Drive, said his issue was with the parking. Mr. McCormick didn't feel the parking was going to be adequate with the overflow situation that is being proposed. Mr. McCormick said people would be forced to cross a busy street. Mr. McCormick felt the safety issues should be of major concern. The suggestion of a foot bridge over the street is one that he would support. Howard Freeman, 131 Crestview Drive, said he lived in the corner property. Mr. Freeman is against this project. Mr. Freeman felt security access would be restricted by putting this facility into the hillside as planned.. Mr. Freeman said there was already a security problem in the pavilion. Mr. Freeman felt that security problems would be less if this facility were across the street and out in the open. Mr. Freeman said that the sound barrier while it might help the sound is just going to create more of a problem because you can't see what 's going on. Mr. Freeman also made some comments about the changing rooms in the facility and safety issues in crossing Upper Afton Road. Ronald Schlangen, 130 Crestivew Drive, said this facility would be in his backyard and he doesn't want it there. He asked that if this facility was going to be put there that the city take the time to do the research on the noise levels and mitigate the sound. Kathleen Schlangen, 130 Crestview Drive, said that a meeting in April Mr. Mack promised they would work with neighbors on design to control sound. She didn't feel this was done and that they needed someone's help. She also said it seemed silly to her to have one structure in the park of one design, concrete, and to have just feet away another building in a completely different style. She said it just doesn't flow. Joseph Grill, 27 Mayhill Road, said that Upper Afton Road was a very busy street. He also said that to have a parking lot on the south side was ridiculous when there was already a parking lot on lower Afton. He also said that a lot of older people enjoy walking on the north side because it is a shorter distance than on the south side. He said if this facility is put in it would completely change the type of park it is now. It won't be a nice quiet place for the older people in the neighborhood to walk around in anymore. He doubted there would be any wildlife coming to that area anymore once this facility is built. Boardmember Erickson closed the public part of the meeting. There was a discussion between the boardmembers and staff regarding the wetland variance. Boardmember Erickson asked whether Item B.3.c. and d. of the staff report should be deleted for further review. Staff will investigate this and report to the council on their findings. Community Design Review Board -11- M chutes of 09 -08 -98 Boardmember Ledvina moved to recommend that the city council: A. Approve the variance request for a 35 -foot encroachment into the required 100 - foot -wide wetland protection buffer around the class 1 wetland south of the proposed osed aquatic facility. This variance would be such where no permanent structures would be constructed within the 100- foot -wide easement. The applicant would be required to restore the wetland vegetation to its existing Pp re q condition to the extent possible following construction. B. Approve the plans (stamped August 18, 1998) for the proposed Battle Creek Regional Park Aquatic Facility, based on the findings by the code. The property owner, Ramsey County, shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 1 2. Provide the following before the city issues grading or building permits for the proposed aquatic facility: a. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan, subject to the city engineer's approval. This plan shall show at least 65 feet of undisturbed wetland- protection buffer from the adjacent wetland. b. A revised landscape plan that identifies the proposed plantings around the aquatic facility. c. A revised landscape plan for the overflow parking lot that shows the relocation of the five boulevard trees to be removed for the new curb cut. The applicant shall move these trees to the north side of the proposed parking lot. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. install a reflectorized stop sign at the exit from the proposed overflow parking lot at Upper Afton Road. b. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure for any outside trash containers for this facility. (code requirement) The enclosures must by 100 percent opaque, match the color of the building and have .a closeable gate that extends to the ground. c. Dedicate and record a wetland -buffer easement for the wetland buffer south of the aquatic facility. This easement shall describe the boundary of the wetland buffer and prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. Community Design Review Board -12- Minutes of 09 -08 -98 d. install wetland- protection buffer signs along the wetland buffer south of the aquatic facility. These signs shall state that there shall be no building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200% of the cost of the unfinished work. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 6. Staff shall investigate conditions 3. c. and d. above to determine if they are required by ordinance. Boardmember Johnson seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. Agenda item T amew MEMORANDUM T4: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Parking Lot and Landscape Plan Changes – Plaza 3000 Shopping Center LOCATION: 3000 White Bear Avenue action b DATE: September 22, 1998 COune,Y INTRODUCTION Endorsed_ Yod2fi ed�� ReJe.cted„.... On September 14, 1998, the city council tabled a request by Richard Schreier to remo�%% concrete medians, as well as several trees and shrubs, from Plaza 3000 shopping center parking lot. I have included the existing site plan for the Plaza 3000 (page 5), Mr. Schreier's last proposal (page 6) and his current proposal (page 7) for comparison. Revised Proposal With his current design, Mr. Schreier proposes to retain the main entrance drive that lines up with the westerly Woodlyn Avenue entrance. He would provide twin medians each planted with five Ash. trees, twelve Fragrant Sumac and 30 Arcadia Junipers. He would also provide six, six -foot- diameter and two -foot -high concrete planters and plant a Newport Plum tree in each. Refer to the current site plan revision and median planting details on pages 7-8. BACKGROUND October 9, 1998: The city council approved a landscape plan revision for Mr. Schreier allowing him to remove 19 trees along the Whi Bear Avenue frontage. He had requested this revision to make his shopping center more visible from White Bear Avenue. The council allowed Mr. Schreier to replace the trees with perennial flower beds and referred this plan to the community design review board (CDRB) for their approval. The CDRB subsequently approved the planting plan. DISCUSSION Staff has compared the Plaza 3000 to two other Maplewood shopping centers that have similar layouts —these are Birch Run Station and the Maple Ridge shopping centers. Both projects were developed with similar building shapes, site configuration and landscape plans. They are good examples of what a shopping center with maturing landscaping can look like when well maintained. The trees in the parking lot medians give these centers an attractive and welcoming appearance. As with the last proposal, staff still feels that Mr. Schreier should concentrate on maintaining what is there, rather than detracting from the shopping center by removing the medians and landscape elements. He should repair damaged medians and replace trees that have died. Birch Run Station and the Maple Ridge shopping centers show what a shopping center can look like when it is maintained properly. The perennial flower beds provided along the White Bear Avenue frontage, furthermore, have not been properly maintained either. These flower beds were allowed by the city council as an alternative to removing most of the trees along this frontage. The current proposal comes closer to meeting the goals of the city code and the original site plan than the last proposal. If the city council wishes to approve Mr. Schreier's parking lot changes, staff recommends the following revisions: 1. Provide additional planters as shown on page 9. Trees in these areas would attractively mark the ends of the parking rows adjacent to the main drive aisle, accentuate the shopping center and denote the drive aisle. 2. Delete the four planters inside the parking lot. These are too few and far between to add any esthetic benefit to the parking lot. The proposed site plan does not show the placement of the existing light poles in the parking lot. And the striping plan does sufficiently show handicap parking spaces and access aisles which are required by the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act). Approval should be conditioned upon Mr. Schreier providing a detailed drawing indicating the placement of all light poles and properly showing the handicap spaces with the adjacent loading aisles. Foundation Plantings The enclosed plan date- stamped September 2, 1998 proposes plantings in front of the building. The applicant submitted this plan for the last council review. Staff finds no problem with this proposal. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Denial of plans date - stamped September 18, 1998 for the renovation of the Plaza 3000 shopping center parking lot, based on the following reasons: 1. The concrete medians were originally proposed and required for traffic control and site beautification with the trees planted within them. They should be maintained rather than removed. 2. The proposed striping pattern does not sufficiently show the proposed handicap parking and handicap- parking loading aisles. 3. The proposed striping pattern does not show the location of the existing light poles in the parking lot. B. If the city council wishes to approve the revised parking lot plan date- stamped September 18, 1998, staff recommends that approval be subject to the applicant doing the following: .1. Provide a six -foot- diameter tree planter at the southerly end of each parking row. 2. Omit the four planters inside the parking lot. 3. Meet ADA requirements for handicap parking. 4. Maintain the perennial flower beds along the White Bear Avenue frontage. 2 C. Approval of the landscape plan date- stamped September 2, 1998 for foundation plantings along the front of the Plaza 3000 shopping center building. p:sec2nWaz3000.p2 Attachments: 1.. Location Map 2. Existing Site Plan 3. Previous Site Plan Revision 4. Current Site Plan Revision 5. Median Planting Details 6. Staffs Proposed Changes 7. Plans date- stamped September 2, 1998 (separate attachment) 8. Revised plans date - stamped September 18, 1998 (separate attachment) 3 Attachment 1 • ► E BEAR LAKE (Do COUNTY Ro,o •o. 65 ~ `T3C; 2 �M / \......! MQQQIf 3 4 t CT ' �Y�[ 721NA j o p� R 0 A a • r..� � Il 1► f •. AM A 1 Q T .....; •....�••; • . ;..,.,.•;,.,.,.;.•,....r,.;' [1.1 Wk t[ LAME • 68 12.1 C NIM<< • CIACL (S.ICHIPPEWA AM NORTH ST. PAUL N � M 004 Y. N 1 V t . . .. l ' 26 N ........... ` )11 coocwlu4 00. ".." 65 ' WONT AV[ � _ $ V • i • • • r `y '• 111# lY� • / �.' 11 I. � , • V.t �y 2400 No •-- -.. —;' 36 LOCATION MAP 4 4 N Attachment 2 w W OODL Yid AVENUE r .---ww.. _ ._.__ 40. _ _ _ ___. _ .-- _ .OWN... .- 1 11111 Ll 1 I I I II 11111111111 1f ii 111111111*1111111I11i �!l1��!lllilill�� sir yes 0 F-o I r irk, LJ f_ �`_ ` � �� +. �..��.• f_ -.r.f...� -....�i ter.+ 7 . • • t1 -?1 .-- 12- low ! 11! 1111111 jll i, � I! �1ll 1111! I � r � �� �,. • LYDIA STREET SITE PLAN EXISTING F t Pik "I Attachment 3 Woodlynn Avenue SITE PLAN PREVIOUS REVISION A sed.. 0 0 1 -14, 1998 4 N Attachment 4 Woodlynn Avenue L co .... JFJ 1-1 i i I ;it Hill --Mom l�J N ja1n0 Aved I PiLlJ k0l3e.j pr w l opus a U.W" SEP 181998 SITE PLAN CURRENT REVISION �e •ten =ad �0� Y �I1fH p10 4 N Attad nnrt 1 � 1 SEP 18 998 MEDIAN PLANTING DETAILS s oZZ xdJ dnlm# I NON ?� � 8 86s Lqr " "S Attachment 6 Woodlynn Avenue i N S EP 181998 Lmxll.�.0 U LD L.- ., ..__ -ft ..•.4rl SITE PLAN STAFF'S PROPOSAL 4 N i AGENDA ITEM -T �� AGENDA REPORT TO: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager FROM: Michael A. Ericson, Assistant to the City Manager RE: Proposed City Purchase of the Historic Bruentrup Farm Action 7 DATE: September 18, 1998 Endormied,,, Vodlti ed........,,,,..._ Rejected..., Date INTRODUCTION At its September 14, 1998 meeting, the Maplewood City Council was presented with an opportunity to purchase the Historic Bruentrup Farm on White Bear Avenue at Lydia Avenue. Bruce Mogren from Edina Realty informed the council that although he had received another offer from a developer he wanted to give the city the opportunity to purchase the roe first. pp ty p property �' BACKGROUND Mr. Mogren stated that he had written into the purchase agreement a 45 day window in which the city has first option to purchase the property. The property is a 6.26 acre parcel listed at $1,839,000 which equates to $6.75 a square foot for the 272,567 square foot parcel. It is currently zoned agricultural but may be rezoned to business /commercial according to the city's Comprehensive Plan. Citizens may have an interest in preserving the parcel of land as a Living Farm - a place to observe and be part of a working farm. There are similar farms in the metropolitan suburban area including: The Gibbs Farm supported by n i Ramsey County and those in the cities of Brooklyn Park, Eagan, and Elk River. They all operate n the same basic manner. A limited number of hours during the week for a limited number of days during the year with time off for holidays and seasonal slow times. Staffing costs are normally for a fulltime employee and six parttime employees with an annual operational budget of $150,000 depending on the size of the farm. Maintenance of the buildings for the Bruentrup Farm may be expensive depending on their a . .e g and physical condition. An article about this city opportunity to purchase the farm was published in the September 23, i p 1998 issue of The Maplewood Review. To date staff has not received any citizen suggestions, input, or feedback. Agenda Report September 18, 1998 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION The city council should accept any comments from the public and determine if the city should do one of the following: 1. Pass on the opportunity to purchase the farm. 2. Further investigate the purchase including an evaluation of the condition of the buildings and a delineation of the costs associated with the operation of the farm. 3. Consider the purchase of the farm for other or combined uses such as the Maplewood Historical Society. Agenda MEMORANDUM TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: September 21, 1998 RE: Ballot Referendum Action by Council: Endorsed....,,,.�. Modifi R e J e c t e d..._.,.,,,.�.�.,.: Date— Introduction Minnesota State Statute 340A.413 places restrictions on the number of intoxicating liquor licenses that may be issued to cities. The City of Maplewood, being a city of the second class, may not have more than 18 licenses plus one for every 2,500 population over 45,000, unless a referendum is placed on the ballot by the governing body and passed by the electorate at a general or special election. On November 22, 1982, Council approved a special election held on January 18, 1983. The electorate passed the referendum bringing the total number of allowable liquor licenses to 25. A referendum was on the ballot for an additional seven on -sale licenses on the November 4, 1997 General Election, the referendum failed. Background Currently the City has one license available. Council must approve placing a referendum on the November 3, 1998 General Election ballot requesting voter approval for an additional seven on -sale licenses or direct staff to conduct the referendum during the 1999 Municipal Election. If Council approves the referendum for the November 3, 1998 General Election, the governing body must direct the following question be placed on the ballot: Shall the City Council be allowed to issue seven `on -sale' licenses for the sale of intoxicating liquor at retail in excess of the number now permitted by law? Yes.......... No........... Recommendation Approve the referendum for the November 3, 1998 General Election and the above state required wording to be placed on the November 3, 1998 General Election ballot.