The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1998 11-23 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 23, 1998 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 98 -26 I. Minutes of Special City Council Meeting 98 -24 (November 4. 1998) 2. Minutes of Meeting 98 -25 (November 9. 1998) NONE All ,matters listed under the Consent Agenda C g are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of y the City Council wishes to discuss an item that item will be removed from the Consen t Agenda and will be considered separately. p y 1. Approval of Claims 2. Financial Transfers for Unassessed Utility Improvements 3. Increase in Community Development Department Service Charges 4. Increase in Miscellaneous Service Charges 5. Certification of Delinquent Sewer Service Bills 6. Conditional Use Permit Review - Countryside Volkswagen /Saab (Highway 36) 7. 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update Time Extension 8. Donation from N. St. Paul /Maplewood Rotary Club 9. Close Public Improvement Projects 10. Tax Forfeit Property 11. State Aid Resolutions 12. MIS /GIS Temporary Position 1. 7:00 P.M. Easement Vacation - Saint John's Boulevard, east of Hazelwood Street (Saint John's Hospital) 2. 7:10 P.M. Bulk Storage Warehouse (1300 McKnight Road North) 1. Conditional Use Permit for Warehouse Expansion and Outdoor Storage 2. Conditional Use Permit for New Office Building 3. Parking Reduction Authorization 4. Design Approval I. AWARD OF BIDS 1. 1999 State Contract for the printing of Maplewood in Motion 1. Bruentrup Farm 2. Dispatch Services 1. Fuel Station Ordinance Amendment 2. NSP Franchise Agreements NONE 1. Committee Reports 3. 9 1. 2. 3. 0. A JOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DI 4:45 P.M., Monday, November 4, 1998 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 98-24 A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Rossbach. George F. Rossbach, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present Kevin Kittridge, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present 1. Canvass of Election Results Councilmember Kittridge moved to awrove the following resolution: IN 98 -11 -111 RESOLUTION CANVASS OF ELECTION RESULTS RESOLVED, That the City Council of Maplewood, Ramsey Count,y Minnesota acting as a canvassing board on November 4, 1998, hereby certifies the following in the November 3, 1998 General Election. Referendum: "Shall the City Council be allowed to issue seven on sale licenses for the sale of intoxicating liquor at retail in excess of the number now permitted by law ?" Yes 6,523 No 7,835 Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 1 '1 W 0; 11ffi Mayor Rossbach moved to adjourn the meeting at 4:50 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all Karen Gui 1 foi 1 e , City Clerk 11 -04 -98 1 PZ MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 9, 1998 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 98 -25 A regular meeting of the City Council of Ma lewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was calle to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Rossbach. George F. Rossbach, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present Kevin Kittridge, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present [! : • • y C ouncilmember Kittrd• m to approve 1 minutes of Meeting 1• •: ( . 1998 as pr esented , Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge, and Koppen Abstain - Councilmember Carlson Ma Kittrid moved to amrove the- minutes of the Council Manager WorksholD (October 5, -199&��p-r--&s-eite�L I I - I E Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Carlson, Kittridge, and Koppen Abstain - Mayor Rossbach Councilmember Carlson moved to aDDrove the Aaenda as amended IV M1. Hmong Celebration Dinner M2. Liquor License Application Process Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all I Mff "• 1 ► I fito 1 9 1 l I ra a 0 NONE 11 -09 -98 1 G. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember Carlson moved to aurove the Consent Agenda as recommended go Seconded by Koppen 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: $ 97,328.82 $ 22,983.27 $450,5500 $ 607,773.70 Ayes - al l Checks #7670 -7678 dated 10 -16 -98 thru 10 -23 -98 Checks #40450 -40540 dated 10 -27 -98 Checks #7679 -7684 dated 10 -23 thru 10 -30 -98 Checks #40544 -40622 dated 11 -3 -98 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: $ 285,675.16 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits Dated 10 -30 -98 $ 18 Payroll Checks #68787 thru 68793 dated 10 -30 -98 $ 304,617.08 Total Payroll $ 912350.78 GRAND TOTAL 2. Lions Club Donation Accepted a $100 donation from St. Paul East Parks Lions Club. 3. English Street Improvements, Project 96 -19 Approved the two following resolution approving the final recapitulation of the construction contract and accepting Project 96 -019 as complete and authorize the release of final payment to Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. In the amount of $23,976.45. 98 -11 -108 RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WHEREAS., the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that English Street, Larpenteur Avenue to Frost Avenue, City Project 96 -19 is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 96 -19 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted b the City. Release y y se of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized. 11 -09 -98 2 98 -11 -109 RESOLUTION FINAL RECAPITULATION OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project, 96 -19, English Street from Larpenteur Avenue to Frost Avenue and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, construction has now been completed with increases in the quantity of some contract unit price items that have resulted in a final project cost greater than the original contract amount, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary that said final contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project- 96 -19, Final Recapitulation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and City clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Final Recapitulation in the amount of $14,963.61. The final contract amount is $387,715.61. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the revised financing plan for the project. The revised project financing p lan is as follows. REVISED CONSTRUCTION COSTS: REVISED FINANCING: Original Contract: $367,752.00 Sewer fund: $2,714.16 +Change Order No. 1 (Incentive): $5,000.00 Assessments: $220,050.00 Final Recapitulation: $14,963.61 State Aid Funds: $292,492.05 Final Contract: $387,715.61 +Ramsey Co. Force Account: $523.00 +City Force Account: $3,591.21 Subtotal: $391,829.82 +Admin, Eng, Legal, Fiscal (31.5 %): $123,426.39 Total Project Cost: $515,256.21 Total Financing: $515,256.21 4. Funds Transfer to Public Works Authorized the Finance Director to make the appropriate budget adjustments for the FEMA grant of $88,385. 5. Wakefield Park - Final Payment Authorized final payment and approval of the Wakefield Park project in the amount of $40,066.63 and authorize the Finance Director to utilize the unallocated balance in the park fund to pay for the shortfall. 6. Emergency Vehicle Pre- emption System Agreement 98012 Approved Agreement 98012 between Ramsey County and the City of Ma lewood and authorize e appropriate City officials to execute the agreement. 7. Gambling Resolution - Hill Murray Mother's Club 11 -09 -98 3 Adopted the following gambling resolution. 98 -11 -110 RESOLUTION BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Ma lewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the ill Murray Mother's Club to operate at Marisas, 2289 Minnehaha Avenue, Maplewood Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute 349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute 349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to-the Gambling Control Division for their approval. 8. Drug -Free Workplace Policy Adopted the Drug -free Workplace Policy as presented. 9. Ordinance to Set Sewer Rates for 1999 - Second Reading Approved the second reading of the ordinance which will increase the sanitary sewer charges effective 1 -1 -99. 10. Ordinance to Revise Recycling Change for 1999 - Second Reading Approved the second reading of the ordinance which will decrease the recycling service charge by $2.16 per quarter effective 1 -1 -99. 11. 1998 Budget Changes -Tax Increment Housing District #1 -6 Fund Approved the following 1998 budget changes 1) increase the estimated tax increment revenue by $150,710 in account 418 -3015; 2) increase the appropriation for interest expense by $135,640 in account 418 -4820. 12. Increase in City Clerk Department Service Charges Approved revisions in City Clerk Department service charges listed in Exhibit A, effective January 1, 1999. 13. Uncollectible Ambulance Bills Authorized $136,028.71 of ambulance bills be written off as uncollectible. 14. Change of Manager Keller Clubhouse Approve the liquor license ap lication for Allison Ann Young of behalf of Prom Management Group, Inc. At Ke ler Golf Clubhouse, 2166 Maplewood Drive. 11 -09 -98 4 1 1. Proposed City Purchase of Historic Bruentrup Farm a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. b. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following persons were heard: Lynn Haugen,' Director of White Bear - Center of - the Arts Vicki Cox, President of the Board of Directors, White Bear Center of the Arts Bruce Mogren, Realtor Representing the Bruentrup Family 1' 11:"A0L ••, 1 • L' •1� •� • 1' �. 1• • .� 1 .1: Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 1. Proposed Options for Reorganization of City Dispatch Services a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the report. b. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following persons were heard: Bob Fletcher, Sheriff of Ramsey County Dick Dormbush, Chief Deputy Ramsey County Gary Coleman, Director of Ramsey County Dispatching Unit Barb Ledo, 1480 S. Sterling Don Cordes, 1930 Edgerton James Pomroy, 200 Kenwood Drive East Sheriff Fletcher, second appearance Bob Zick, 1880 E. Shore Drive 11 -09 -98 5 David Peaslee, 2597 Southlawn Drive, AFSCME Representative Jamie Flaugher, 7650 Stepleview Rd., Maplewood Dispatcher Kathy Juenemann, 721 Mt. Vernon Avenue Greg Juenemann, 721 Mt. Vernon Avenue Bob Schneider, 1781 English Street Sherry Batterman, 2031 Kenwood Drive West Elmer Swenson, 1597 Frost Avenue Paul Hahn, 2010 Greenbrier Street Tom Campbell, 2472 Cypress, Deputy Sheriff Ramsey County Jeannette Hewitt, 2021 Kenwood Drive West Jerry Syverson, 2016 Greenbrier Kathy Juenemann, second appearance Sheriff Fletcher, third appearance Mayor Rossbach moved to approve City Manager McGuire's second option to upgrade the cit 's current police y p e and fire dispatch service by purchasing the necessary equipment at a cost of $300,000 and by.adding two dispatchers and one supervisor at an estimated cost of $115,000 per year in 1999 dollars. Motion F a i l e d Ayes - Mayor Rossbach, Councilmember Allenspach Nays - Councilmembers Kittridge, Carlson, Koppen Councilmember Carlson moved to direct staff to return to the next meeting to be held on November 23, 1998 with answers to questions asked by the public and Council. Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Councilmembers Kittridge, Carlson, Allenspach, Koppen Nay - Mayor Rossbach 1� " ► : l I t R Bob Zick, 1880 East Shore Drive. Mr Zick was present to ask questions regardin the Conditional onal Use Permit for the Ramsey County Compost Site. Sue Clark, 1486 Sterling Street South, addressed Council about communications with the Council and public. James Pomroy, 200 Kenwood Drive East asked question regarding a City Web site. Barb Ledo, 1480 South Sterling, addressed the Council about communications with the Council and the public. 1. Hmong Celebration - Mayor Rossbach extended congratulations to those who received plaques from the Hmong Community for their support and hel p g durin the recent burial of six children. 2. Liquor License - Mayor Rossbach requested information on the 48 hour notification of change of Manager for liquor license holders. Clerk Guilfoile informed him that current procedures were state law and also in the City Code of Ordinances. 3. Veteran Day - Mayor Rossbach announced that City Hall would be closed on Wednesday 11 -11 -98 in observance of Veterans Day. 11 -09 -98 6 NON E Councilmember Kittredge moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:05 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - All Karen Gui 1 foi 1 e , City Clerk 11 -09 -98 AGENDA NO. G -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director W. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: November 16, 1998 Action by Council.* Endorse Modify. ed,., Rejecte ;Date Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $117,756.18 Checks #7685 thru #7698 dated 11 -2 thru 11 -6 -98 $167,631.07 Checks #40626 thru #40767 dated 11 -10 -98 $1,242.97 Checks #7699 thru #7701 dated 11 -12 thru 11-13-98 $122,821.47 Checks #40773 thru #40887 dated 11 -17 -98 $409,451.69 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: $295,999.83 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 11-15-98 p $22,343.58 Payroll Deduction check #69191 thru #69204 dated 11 -13 -98 $318,343.41 Total Payroll $727,795.10 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have an y questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on . g file if necessary. hu Attachments 2 11/06/98 13:23 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER 8 3 FOR PERIOD 11 VOUCHER/ 4 CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM 5 6 UMBEfic ATE ---NUMB ITEM 3 7685 11/02/98 071490 BIG APPLE BAGEL FOOD FOR COUNCIL/MGR WORKSHOP 10 29.95 7686 11/02/98 450260 LAFFERTY LYDIA REFUND OF COBRA PREMIUM - 121 REFUND OF COBRA PREMIUM 1..945.40 38.91 19984.31 3 14 15 7687 11/02/98 341706 HERITAGE BANK U.S. SAVINGS BONDS 500.00 500.00 7609 11/02/98 630018 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS r/R DEDUCTED OCT FOR NOV PREM 273.00 273.00 23 16.29 32.58 7 11 7691 11/04/98 900200 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE SHIPPING CHARGES 6. IS 6.18 29 ,24 32 51 PERA CONTRIBUTIONS 33 36 31 HEALTH-LIFE-DENTAL INS. A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE lv987.50 381 v -305 40 HEALTH-LIFE-DENTAL INS. 17 v 621.91 41 A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 4 509081.25 42 43 7694 11/05/98 530100 MEDICA CHOICE HCMA DEDUCTION PAY HEALTH-LIFE-DENTAL 3 873.44 5 INS. 21 7695 11/05/98 551100 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE HCMA DEDUCTION PAY 50 LIFE- INSURANCE.-PAYADLE 303.50 0 72,15 51 A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 139.51 2,326.72 55 7696 11/05/98 320293 GREAT-WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. OCT 1998 ADM FEE 620.83 620.83 57 7698 11/06/98 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSIE-S. DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 200.00 200.00 626 11/10/gE) ARLENE ALLEN REFUND-AMB 9801253.8 & 98012995 509.95 509.95 40629 11/10/98 IIEDICA FINANCE REFUND-AMB 980122'68 72 469.76 469.76 73 40630 11/10/98 GENEVIEVE MALONEY REFUND--AMB ?801153 7.. m 77.12 __27.12 2 11/06/98 13:23 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER 2 3 FOR PERIOD 11 4 VOUCHER/ 5 6 CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM 7 NUMBE &I ATE____NUMBE __NAME --------..-DESCRIPTION- ITEM CHECK 8 9 46631 11/10/98 010465 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES PAGER 10 PHON17 10.54 7-2 30,2,6- 11 12 40632 11/10/ge 010467 AT & T TELEPHONE 13 ELEP44ONE 17.25 12.9z TELEPHONE 89.54 11 I . 15 TELEPHONE 21.98 241.70 117 16 40633 11/10/gs 010490 ACCURATE ELECTRIC MOTOR SERV REPAIR MOTOR 459.02 459.02 11 19 0634 ll/-IoZga--01057-5--ACE-IiARDWARE--------.. ---------IvIAINTENANCF-MATF-FCIALS 1 20 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT --335.. 365.38 700.62 21 22 40635 0/-98-____02015Q_AERIAL_ COMMUNICATIONS _____TELEPHONE --5a.-57 1 231 40636 11/10/98 020411 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR.. BELLEVUE TELEPHONE .57- j 25i 31.71 TELEPHONE 127 TELEPHONE 31-04 1 28 --_TELEP.Hmr_ 32.07 I i 29 11 TELEPHONE _59--ti 6.80 301 TELEPHONE 29.52 1 :331 40637 11/10/98 020900 ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC ELECTRIC WORK CAMPUS 232.00 232.00 40638 11/10/gE) 021200 AMERICAN FASTENER OF MN. INC. SUPPLIES - VEHICLE STEEL STEEL HEX NIPPLE 114.00 42.77 156.77 40639 11/10/98 021250 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER MATS-P. WORKS 15.913 ____40640 ---11/10/-9(3 ------- - -03041 --ANDERSON. --EARL F.- - -INC. BUMPERS 40641 11/10/9 0, 7. 0,30420 ANDERSON EVERETT A MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 94.08 94.08 40642 11/10/98 030660 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC. ANIMAL CONTROL 10/23-10/3o 880.50 (380.50 -40643-11/10/98. 031075 ------APOLLO--- LENS-FOR-F:$RDJECI*OFZ--.-.___.________.__ 0�00 40644 11/10/98 031100 APPEARANCE PLUS CAR WASH CAR WASHES - - 99.41 99.41 40645 11/10/98 041005 ARDEN SHOREVIEW ANIMAL H O VET. SERVICES VET SERVICES 109.19 33.54 142.73 2 * 3 40646 11/10/9E) 071350 BETTENDORF ROHRER KNOCHE WALL APPRAISAI. SERV. PROJ. 89-21 6,700.0o 6 00 0 .700.00 551, ______40647 11/10/gf3 031250 L-31:ZAD RAGAN INC. TIRES L 14 7 7 A7 186.08 -40640 1.1/10/gE 090795 BROCK WHITE COMPANY L-L.C. MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 7. 1 PlAIlWTENANCE__MlERlAl 5.01 `29-a_42 7! 6 J3 4:, 76 22 a7l I� .'e CITY OF _ hIAF'LE WOOD .----- - - -_.- - - - - - -- - - F - 8 Z 11 13:23 VOUCI- Il::ai /CHECK REGISTER - - - -_ - - - - - - - -- , 31 FOR PERIOD 1:I 2 3 VOUCHER/ 5 f,'HE:'.CK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR - -- - - - -- 5 . ITEM ITE::M CI -IECK 6 �_NUMDEI_ -__. -- DATE. - -- - -._ - -- -- hIUMEtEh-------- __-- ._NAihE....- ____ -__- _____ -- --------_-_------DE:iCIill'T- ION.__ - -- - - -- - -- -- -- .. -- - -- AMOUNT----- .. - --- - - - -- AMOU 8 40649 11/10/98 110091 CO2 SERVICES a � CHEMICALS 65.60 -- - -- _ _ 65.60 , 1 40650 11/10/98 110550 CARTE GRAPH SYSTEMS - - -- SIGN VIEW SOFTWARE PKG - - - - - -- 395.00 � SIGNVIEW TR AINING - - HURLEY :x9 5.00 u , -- _- _ - - - - -_ __ -- -- _ -_ - -- aIGNV -IEW- TRAIl�l2Nli••-OSWALD - -- - - 3 95-.QJ he '�1 SIGNVIEW TRAINING EDGAR 395.00 15x000 �� , . ,. �- - .120515 _.CENTRAL _STORES - - - - -- ------- TONEI� _ -_ -- - - - - -- 414...07 414...0 z: 4' 4x6 `12 11/1 0/98 150870 COMMERCIAL PARTNERS TITLE /C ss 2819 WHITE BEAR AVE. N 5, 000.00 22 2. -__ _ _ -- - - - -- - - 2839_ WHI TE --- - - _ BEAR AVE. - -N -- - -- - - -- - -- - 120 _ 14_ - -- - 5,120...14 12 ` 40653 11/10/98 161110 CRAMER BUILDING SERVICES REPLACE COMPRESSOR ADD'L DAMAG 16 16v470.00 , 0654 11/10/98 170900 D & D TOWING SERVICE INC. TOW FOR SQUAD 941 47.9; 2v TCIW F'UCi SQUAD 965 3:. 47.9 95.86 40655 11/10/98 181375 DARE AMERICA MERCHANDISE STICKER SHEETS,COIN PURSE 33 ,j - - - -- SALES TAX F'Et�.. OUT OF STATE 2 35.40 35 3a 13.33- 222.10 35 a, 406 56 11/10/98 181852 DAMS LOCK & SAFE KEYS CUT & LOCKS REKEYED 55 .pg 5 OB 3; ,i . « 9 -_ -_ __190100_. - -___ DEGE _.GARDEN CENTER_..- - --- -. _ -.. - -- GYPSUM_ - ~ 508 - - - -- �i _ C� G -' 40658 11/10/98 200528 DICKSON 4, DATA LOGGER v AO20 o TECH BOARD 42 .:>81.00 381.00 43 i 40659 11/10/98 231545 EDSON, DAVID SAFETY TOED DO0T5 -- 30.00 30.00 ,5 ____40660 0 -. -- 11/.10/98 __- - = �-. 47 2 34450__-- __LLECTION._ SYSTEMS -_& SOFTWARE .__ -- _- ELECTION _ 1' 1AC1 lI1dE _ROLL:i_--- .-- +------- _ - - - -- 7 3„�S 48, MARKING PENS 39 F33 - 111.41 49 ' 50' --- - - - - -- X10661. - .11/_10/98 _._ - 240710- .. - -_ -- .ENGRAPI.IICS„ _._INC.._ 51 - - _- - - - -_ _ _ NAME . PLATES - - -__ __ -- 44;44 52I F . 250 40h 531 40662 11/10/9£250505 250505 M. F "RATTAL -C)NE= 5•.I 0001 GERVAIS AVE. E 7,111.00 55 1 - - - - -- -- _ __ - - -- - -- 0001 .GERVAIS_AVE, E. -- - - - -- - -- -- - -- _813.35-- Z.9,22.b..`' 56, 571 40663 11 / 10/98 260755 FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEEMBE:RSH:I' P5 1 •5 00 925.0 5LI 40664 11/10/93 100ti00 G $: K SERVICES `I �., - _. _ .._----- - - - - -. -----____--------.-_--- -- _ -_ - -- UI�IIF ORMa & CLOTHING 6x.01 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 10. - - - - - -- MAT. _ _ _ - -12. ao - - -- - - - - - - -- :il. PPL.IE'.S -- JANITORIAL - - 15.19 6 (JNII =URNS & CLOTHING 5.19 MATS 7 -- 49.60 :3UF'1 =•LIES -- JANITORIAL 14.91 - - -- -- - - - - -- q UNIF:'ORMS & CLOTHING 70 a5. 50 255.70 71 4066 11 / 10/98 2501285 GEMF'LEF; ' S , INC . - - - -_ _ - -- _ -- 72 K I MTOW EI_ W I PER:3 ]. ti2.8U 152.80 73 74 40666 11/3.0/98 301 GENERAL SP RINKLER CORP. 1420 E. CO. RD D 5 1,900.00 _ 75 1420 E. CO. RD D 89. _ 1 a, VOUCHRE' 11/06/98 13:23 CITY__OF__ MAPLEWOOD �2 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER 3 FOR PERIOD 11 VOUCHER/ • CHEC K CHECK. VENDOR VENDOR ITEM HEMQUIST.. MICHAEL LODGING' ____l%jUMBER_- A-TE_____NUllBER___NAME______ 7 1 24 125 DESCRIP-rIDN-- ITEM CHECK MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT -----AMOUNT 413.25 1 8 40667 11/10/98 9 301690 GERHOLTZ. JIM FEES FOR SERVICE HEWITT JOEL MEALS,, LODGING-FIRE CHEIF COW 150.00 150.00 0 A 40668 11/10/98 302930 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES DESKJET PRINTER 191.35 28 -0675 lZ10/98-Z50500 -HINNENKAMF'- UNIFORMS-&-CLCITHING 160.51 160.51 2 40669___tl�410/98 7,,10850-GOVERt4MENT-TRAINING-SERVICE------R-EG.FZR 3 INGLDG.SEMIN 7.10-.-0.0 _qE�-SpR -B -60.. 4 40670 11/10/98 5 320265 GRAFIX SHOPPE MISSION STATEMENT SIGNS NOVEMBER RETAINER FEE 31 161.88 161-88 It QZA IA/l /I/t$ 5: OZ 66 GRAINGER SMALL TOOLS 82.59 SMALL TOOLS 54-04 136.63 40672 11/10/98 340110 HEJNY RENTALS, INC AUGER 7f. 38 RENTAL GRIDDLE 148.39 219.77 123 qQ6/15 11/10/98 340500 HEMQUIST.. MICHAEL LODGING' 1 24 125 1 L- MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 329.25 84.00 413.25 1 ' 40674 11/10/98 341800 HEWITT JOEL MEALS,, LODGING-FIRE CHEIF COW 191.35 191.35 28 -0675 lZ10/98-Z50500 -HINNENKAMF'- UNIFORMS-&-CLCITHING 7.10-.-0.0 30-00 29 40676 11/10/9 370076 HUGHES & COSTELLO NOVEMBER RETAINER FEE 31 --___OCTOBER_LEGAL_SERVI.CES 59000.00 15L.-70 5, 21 -5 - 20 32 1331 40677 11/10/9 380820 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS CARTRIDGE - : It- 34 __________.___COPIER__ _ LEASE 1011 264.68 ^ 65, COPIER LEASE 20% 66038 596.5,6 --- SERV.-ACT..-F-EE !M 40679 11/10/9 390150 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO., INC. B36 -B BANDO BELT 10! 4 1.51 41.51 40600 11/10/98 391935 /F 1 PLAY CLUBHOUSE MDSE. FOR RESALE ; 4ii :-12 180.00 180.00 -40681-il/.10/--98.--400630-------J-L.-HAMIIETT . P3 i 44 40682 11/10/9E) 400800 JASON'S DRY ICE DRY ICE 26.75 26.75 40683 11/10/98 400950 JEANE Tl••10RNE TEMPORARY SER VICE TU-ill::,. SERVICES FOR SE 123.89 123.89 ____4_06E*:4___ 11/10/9 410160 .-KF:M(:) 3 F'EAT_.MARWICK._____ AUDI T_PROGRESS B ILL ING___ � it 5. 40685 11/10/98 410250 7106 KIIART CANDY.. CANDLES. CREPE PAPER %000 84.72 A&D-0-0,00 84.72 40606 1.1/10/98 COM TECHNOLOGI.E-S PENT Il PC/NOECILIS lvl()N):TOR IV590.88 15590.8B 40687_ 11/10/98 410370 KATH COMPANIES Sl:*-'LASI-i GUARD ' DISC,'. SET . 127.67.---- 32.22 ROTOR 101.64 261.53 7 40680 11/10/98 430300 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. PUMPKIN KNIVES 3.17 m PUBLIC NOTICES 135.94 1 11/06/98 CITY. OF 5 13:23 3 FOR PERIOD ii 20 51 I VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR SWEETS, BUNS AM 19 40689 11/10/98 430350 GECC/KNOX LUMBER MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 27.09 '23 40695 11/10/98 510550 MAPLEWOOD DEVELOPMENT 40690 11/10/98 450120 L.M.C.I.T. BALANCE OWING ON QTRLY INS PRE 791.00 791.00 1 :14 40691 11/10/98 450150 LA PRENSADE MINNESOTA EMPLOYMENT AD-POLICE OFFICER 54.60 54.60 AIRFARE M. ERICKSON PUBLIC NOTICES 135.94 329.94 20 40694 11/10/98 510500 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY SWEETS, BUNS 284.05 '23 40695 11/10/98 510550 MAPLEWOOD DEVELOPMENT 27 40696 11/10/98 510925 MAPLEWOOD TRAVEL AIRFARE M. ERICKSON 460.00 460.00 29 40697 11/10/98 520525 MCKNIZIE METRO APPRAISAL COURT APPRAISAL PROJ. 89-21 600.00 600.00 MEALS. - LODGING 717Z. 79- V1 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 98.00 371.7 9 ! 3.1 i FUEL- STAB ILIZ UTILITY KNIVES 5.71 10.78 190.00- 181,810.00 FIMO CLAY 38.36 65.91 2682 BARCLAY ST. N 28.22 1 --40703 11/10/98 .71 '3�__40704 OCTOBER SURTAX RETAINER 4!,109.64 11/10/98 542310----- MINNESOTA -NATURALIST ASSOC. -------MlqA FALL WORKSHOP-A.HUTCHINSON 40705 11/10/98 542345 MINNESOTA PHOTO FILM DEVELOPING j 40706 11/10/98 542455 MINNE*SOTA S'FIRE*DDING LLC DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 7 49. 9 5 49.95 7 NU*r DRIVER 7 12.34 12.34 7 11/06/98 13:23 -.....-CITY OF MAFLEWOUD---------. VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE EMPLOYMENT AD FOR PERIOD 11 907.1 1 IZ-J-01-9R-6309-4 NEEDED S -JAN IT0R_SUFF_,Ly__.__ UP-PLIES - ANIMRIAL VOUCHER/ 40715 11/10/98 640805 CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR Will BEFZ----DA.TF- NUMBER NAME_ ITEM _nESCRIFffl0H__ ITEM CHECK _AMOUl,4 lmGUNx_ 40709 11/10/98 570090 MOGREN BROS. TURF BLEND SEED 157.09 157.09 11 ff.#V/J.V ll/lv/ytj .570092 MOGREN SOD FARMS., INC. SOD 53.25 53.25 121 _tl___l I / I 8 13�_ 407 ------ L:LG40.0 MUNICILLTE ------CO , -___ADAF!TERS .65 14 CREDIT ON INV. 10468 15-85- 190.80 15 _407__t2 11 OZ9S-------620600 -----MUSKA-LIGHTING- CENTER `ANQlJET_RWM I T �,A_y 16 GHTS 5 171 CREDIT ON RETURNED BULBS 268.38- ,el BOX LAMPS, BALLAST 145.69 220.56- 4v /I ll/lv/ytj 630910 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE EMPLOYMENT AD 320.42 320.42 907.1 1 IZ-J-01-9R-6309-4 NEEDED S -JAN IT0R_SUFF_,Ly__.__ UP-PLIES - ANIMRIAL 26 - 724 40715 11/10/98 640805 NEW CONCEPTS IN CUSTOM HOMES 1969 COPE AVE E 1,000.00 47- 1: --i-047-12 1975 40716 11/10/98 640815 NEWPROS DATA, INC. PUBLISHING 78.00 78.00 40717 11/10/98 661108 NORTH STAR WIPER & INDUSTRIAL COFFEE CUPSpTOWELS TOIL TTC'CZ"V r%Vnl 461.95 ILI ��7J X 78.01 839.96 131 i_2 40718 11/10/98 661755 NORTHERN STATES POWER 217 3. 14 133i 771 3.14 1975 h 2268 3.14 4.40 3 3�14_ 1902 570.56 1177 323.44 1900 213.80 2001 273.31 1457 16 52 8.32 83.91 .1.775 1 (33) 123.71 e 9 90.24 io ist 1-01 1910 1 52.93 1981 68. 02 117.87-- 2276 19.66 2358 81.42 2300 r 2464 - 185. 53 2925 88.60 298 1-- fl 2991 169.37 ILI ��7J w -- ' ----' czr, or nm~u�000--___'_______- 1 11/06/98 13:23 voucvsn/onscx psozarsn w 2 FOR psnIOm 11 , CHECK CHECK vswoom vswoom ITEM zrsm CHECK 6 -AIUI"IBER ----DATE _--_NUMDErc __. NAME '_--___ | `91 203 17'11 , 11 16 6 2 18.66 12 1685 26.43 " 14 1810 18.69 15 1845 32.68 ^ 17 1 8 4 5 14.22 16 1940 595.94 " 20 2001 42.74 21 2019 35.34 2101 7.53 " 1231 2401 32.07 ! 251 1035 321.67 ^ 261 1080 144.55 28 2146 15.70 v 211 2345 11.49 210OCC 13 19 " 114 SIR-70 ^ C REDIT PLAN ax n cAmr 118'16 _auppLzsa_-_ OFFICE 1:ng 19 , OLD CAR pnzcs ouzos 35'98 rm'pa 40722 11/10/98 690340 oLaow, ARNOLD o - --- MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 96 MI. 26.88 26.88 --��z��_____r�� » rssa FOR asnvzcs am'^m i rssa FOR asnvICs ao'am rssa rnn_asnvz ____nn ---' — » rssa FOR SERVICE mn'an pssa FOR asmvzcs nn'an - ____'_ - _-_'_ _ � __'__ _ _ -____. - rssa �m 49 rc . asmvzos___�� -___-- _____ �__zu. sa FOR asmvzcs mm'au ' rssa FOR asnvzcs mm'an rssarmm asmvzms' rssa r- 01-� esnvzcs nn'an . rssa FOR asnwzcs ao'an '--- - ' rssa rcm asnvzcs - nn'an _ a5�,0__ "� 40724 11/10/93 700663 PAGING �*T'W(3RxOF MIA, zNC' PAGER FEES 388'72 MO. SERVICE 49. 57 4p] k ' U° � � � � m w ° ---~~~—~---------------------' � ��"� __________- -- —czr,�m` -------'-- ��i�� ." =°"" =..°^�m Luas--oCroasm FOR psmzoo u OCTOBER CAR WASHES 31.00 o^Eox CHECK VENDOR VENDOR _�_______D~~^R^~ zTEM zrsn o*sox 40725 11/10/98 70067n PAKOY MECH. INSP. */30-10/30/98 16,426'550 ,53r 16,426'50 40734 __ INS P. '',,-~~~~_~ "",53o'12- RIVIERA FINANCE BICYCLE HELMETS 40727 11^10^98 711690 pzowscm pnsaa aunacnzprzowa m wsnasnavzpa az.uo 22.10 40728 11/10/98 712100 PITNEY BOWES INC. RENTAL FEE 28.50 28.50 LIGHTS & POWER SUPPLY FOR SOD 367.33 2478 nArrsn*onw on _ -----��' -a, —.11/10/9(3 ^,017'67 761300 --ROADRUNNER 367.33 40731 11/10/98 741200 nAzwaow r000a cooxoES GROCERIES BUNDLE BAG'S REFRESHMENTS mz'om 87.25 SUPPLIES 24.00 26.08 303.31 40732 11/10/98 741310 RAMSEY CLINIC ASSOCIATES ALS TRAINING 100.00 100.00 �� ``�� 1:; 401 __________- __. ." =°"" =..°^�m Luas--oCroasm OCTOBER CAR WASHES 31.00 OCTOBER CAR WASHES 40734 11/10/98 751510 RIVIERA FINANCE BICYCLE HELMETS 10.45 10.45 4 lo� 40735 11/10/98 761200 ROAD RESCUE. INC. LIGHTS & POWER SUPPLY FOR SOD 367.33 1 1 ---40736 —.11/10/9(3 761300 --ROADRUNNER 367.33 40737 11/10/98 780300 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 471 OFFICE* 5.19 OFFICE 1 30.43 SUPPLIES OFFICE 52- OFFICE- : 40738 11/10/98 PANCAKE MIX 59. Be CHIPS 32.45 151 PLATES, [-;YFZUF,, USAGE SA CANDY FOR DANCE, SNACK(S' SUFTLIE 178. 09 401 *I CITY OF MAPLL WOOD------- _-- ._... - - - - -- - -.. _. - _ - - -- -- 9 ' 11/06/98 13:23 VOL1C:1••IF::R /C:F•Ik�C:K F'iECiISTE�Fi 1 2 FOR PERIOD 11 I VOUCP4ER/ i'� . CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK ; 17 '-NUMBER _-DATE _- ___.__NUMBER .- .__--- - -NAME ____ -- -------- _----- _.----- __ -_ -- -- ----- DE:�ChIP- TIOht___ -- ----- -___ -- -.._. - __ -- - _AMOUNT______ . -- AMOUNT a 4 SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 15.00 1c -- - - - -- - _- LATE- CH•IARG - - - - - _49 _1 2.60-- I 1 '•2 40739 . 11/10/98 790116 SCHMITT MUSIC LIGHTS 81.00 81.00 !��! 40740 11/10/98 790600 SCRAPBUSTERS INC. CRUSHED FILTERS 50.00 50.00 1 1151 4.07_41- 1.1/_.1.OL98_- .___800300 _SEPLER__&-- ASSOCIATES - _-- ___ --_ _- -INVESTIGATIVE-TRAINING _- _ �- 000..0 0 --2-,0 0 -00 ' 1" 40742 11/1 0/98 800600 SEVERSON, DAVID DINNER, PARKING 187.78 118 pq ---- - - - - -- -- . - - - -- - - - --- - - _ -- - - - - -- MILEAGE_ - REIMBURSEMENT - 260- MI - - - - 20 ! 40743 11/10/98 820460 SLABA , JACLEE FEES FOR SERVICE 200.00 21 ___ _____ F7INAL. _F'MT -.-_ CHaILD_CARE._._ROOM- _____ -_- 250.00. 450.0.0 40744 11/10/98 831400 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC. PUBLISHING 4,2 3 6.52 UNIFORMS_ &_CLOT1.IING_ - - -- _ -. - -_- 1 9.0t.-46 4 ,42 6 -98 40745 11/10/98 840405 ST. P=AUL, CITY OF BILLING-FIRE -FIRE F'ROT. CONTRACT PR OT. .3 9 300.04 i 271 - -- - - - - -- - _ -- __ - - - - -- -- - - -- -- - - -- -- - - -- MED I CAL - SUPEL.IES '' 1.26 129+ MEDICAL SUPPLIES 1 6 1 31 - 407_46 - .11/10 %98 -_ - _ --842300 - - - - -- -_STAR -- SUPPLY - - -- - -- -_ - - - - - -- - -_ - - -- .-- - - - - -- - - -- PLUMB I NG..- SUPPLIE Z ^ ...-54 PLUMBING FARTS 40.90 113.44 ;3 -_ 4.0747_- __11/_10/98.-- .__ -_- .84280.0 -- -STATE _SUPPLY_.COMPANY-__...____ .._-- . -. - - -- BOILER. -- GAUGES - -___ 1 02_-24 1 02 '"' 407 11/10/98 843331 STIEN, MARY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 235 MI. 65.80 65.80 40749 >A; 11/10/98 843530 STRANDELL, BARBARA DISC ASMT. TOOLS FOR 12 -2 -98 88.00 88.00 _-- 11/_10/98 -_._. __850:120_._ - __SUBURBAN SPORTSWEAR,-- INC.._.- •------- -ADULT _T -_. 1 69 0. YOUTH T'S-- SCREEN FEE 316.40 485.60 '`�- - -- -- IU751 __ 11/10/98 8503 _ _ SULsWAY PARTY. SUBS ___ -___ -- ----- .--- ____ -. -. -- -- - - - - -- ___ - -- -- - -. - -- 61.85 40752 11/10/98 850340 SUMMIT INSPECTION SERVICES LTD ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS 4 - :, ELECTFZICAL__INSF'ECTIONS - - -- . -.. __ :1, 022.7.5_.___._.. -- ----.-_.--._-.-- ;- 1- i ECTRICAL INSI='ECTIONS 5 4 _._407 _11/10/98 85039 5 SUNRAY B -T - -B _- SWITCH-__ '- "' -- -- .' "" 40754 11/10/98 850600 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMER I CA LLC FUEL 40.70 40.70 4 0755 11/10/98 880501. TREADWAY GRAPHICS GLITZ PENCILS, BUMBER STICKERS :i::i"l' . 50 GLITZ PENCILS. BUI ='ER STICKERS 159.75 497.25 40756 11/10/98 880675 TROPH I E: S UNL_ I1" I:I:'rEI) TROPHIES 299.60 299.60 = - -- . 40757 11/10/98 880750 TROY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES SUP'P'LIES °- .JANITORIAL 277.41 *I ^ � v v n; , ` ° " '^ |� ~----- 7 6 OUCEIRP 2 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER 3 Fof� PERIOD 11 41 VOUCPIER/ 5 CHECK CHECK 61 VENDOR VENDOR ITEM -NUMBER—DATE.---- ITEM CHECK AMOUNT -10 9 40758 11/10/ge 880800 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG. WHEEL CHOCKS 37.49 11 BRACKETS FOR SHOVELS TOOLS 96.69 12 REPAIR & MAINT/VEHICLE 562.23 954.09 14 40759 11/10/98 890910 US WEST DEX PUBLISHING 99.50 99.50 17 40761 11/10/98 18 900100 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 62.91 62.91 20 40762 11/10/99 901300 UPPER MIDWEST SALES CO., SUPPLIES JANITOR IAL 441.77 441.77. 21 23 40764 11/10/98 241 931300 WALSH WILLIAM P. PLUMBING INSPECTIONS 25 PLUMBING INSPECTIONS 64.00 PLUMBING INSPECTIONS O-An 80.00- 64.00 407-6-5 1-tlloZgg —9-4-0575----WESTERN 28 -CONTAINER--COMPANY -----RA TARGET SACKING g 7% 2- A 2 40766 11/10/98 30 942520 WINIECKI.. FRANK M 1420 CO. RD. D 109009.00 33 40767 ii/lo/ge 970700 YOCUM OIL CO. MOTOR OIL 34 (30.39 80.39 36 TOTAL CHECKS 285.387.25 , ` ° " '^ |� ~----- 201 LINDA J. HANSON REFUND-DOUBLE CHARGED-MEMB. CITY OF* MAPLEWOOD ;211 11/13/98 10:151 VOUCHER/0-41ECK REGISTER 40.00 PAGE 1 40778 VOUCHER/ REATA LABORE RE1:7UND PATIENT PD BEFORE INS. :251 2 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM 327.00 327.00 40779 11/17/98 JEAN OLANDER REFUND PATIENT PD F20195 1 6 7699 11/12/98 900200 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE SHIPPING CHGS 308.40 308.40 7 10.97 43 91 7700 11/13/98 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 332.00 332.00 SANITATION 3; -900.40—' 112 40'773 11/17/98 HEALTH PARTNERS REFUND DUP. PMT. F20260,20345 31.59 i. : 1 15 40774 11/17/98 SWANSON PLUMBING & HEATING REF*UND PLBG. PERMIT 10455 REFUND PLBO. PERMIT 10455 8.9.00 i 1171 if 40775 11/17/98 AMY ZERWAS REFUND ELECT. PERMIT 97-1313 181 11/17/98 020411 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE TELEPHONE REFUND ELECT. PERMIT 97-1313 16.00 i f 50 201 LINDA J. HANSON REFUND-DOUBLE CHARGED-MEMB. ;211 40.00 40.00 40778 11/17/98 REATA LABORE RE1:7UND PATIENT PD BEFORE INS. :251 327.00 327.00 40779 11/17/98 JEAN OLANDER REFUND PATIENT PD F20195 127 308.40 308.40 t28� SANITATION SANITATION 3; 32 SANITATION 31.59 1-97-95 40702 11/17/98 020411 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 4 7.25 543.35 —40783 —021200.. -.-AMEFa CAN - FASTENER OF-MN, INC. -.—I-IEX-NLJTSWAS�-IERSL,.BOLTS 5 5 40784 11/17/98 021465 AMERICAN RED CROSS MANAKINS 5 5- 425.90 425.90 5 40785 11/17/98 030310 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. SHIPF'ING/HANDLINGpPRO6. STA.2 57 334.35 334.35 40*7(.)7 11/17/98 030640 ANDON INC. HELIUM RENTAL 40788 11/17/98 030865 APACHE PRINT PUBLISHING 1 1v313.15 AQUA CITY IRRIGATION,- INC. -SPRINKLER-SYSTEM 40790 11/17/98 061906 BAUER BUILT 69 BATTERY 97.79 7C 97.79 71 40791 11/17/98 070390 BEHAN, 72 RE11113URSEPIENT 68 111. 65 0 0' 65.00 73 VOUCIARE2 11/13/98 10:51 VOUCI•ER/ CHECK CHECK 40792 11/17/98 1 '7 of t5 Cl CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER PAGE 2 FOR PERIOD VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER ITEM CHECK 071250 BEST SOFTWARE, INC. SUPPORT FOR FAS WINDOWS W95 465.00 aAR A^ Q44jv VKAV KAUAN INC. 40794 11/17/98 110150 C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES 4n-79--i I i *1.7 .no CASING CREDIT Y 40.00- SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 490-82 JWVQ4T-0RY-0E--SUF'P4" FEES FOR - CREDIT SERVICE 25.00 Inc; nn 0 1: i 2 . 12. 21 I 3, A 141 �2 1 3 3 14.1 --4(X794-"/-17,498-----420,51,0---- 40797 40798 -4070 11/17/98 11/17/98 a a %,P V t JEANETTE - 120650 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 151350 COMPUCARD INC. • 0-----CONNEY--SAF-TEY-PRODur-Ts--------- MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 20 MI. D-"- DE-ICING SALT DE-ICING SALT MAINTENANCE MATERIALS MAINTENANCE MATERIAL CR 80 PVC CARDS 30M 5.60 8 , 622. 09 119785-79 173.70 473.91 240.53 5.60 24 647.61 240.53 - 40800- i.- 1/- 1- 749B - --- L52400-COP-Y-EQUIPMENT.".NC. RUBBER GLOVES, ENVIROCIDE 40001 11/17/98 161300 CROSSON., LINDA REIMBURSEMENT-MUDWORKS.,STICK L - W 40802 11/17/98 170300 40803 11/17/98 CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. HANDLE GRIPS 180140 D.C. SALES Co.,. INC. HEATING PARTS -40804-1 " 'MENT-CO.----- 127.27 34.80 34.08 43.25 285.85 5-2-28 8'Z 4 0- 34.08 43.25 A/C CHARGER BUNKER BOOT UNIF_0RMS_ 10.50 84.00 - f% r-m 40805 401306 - - -- 11/17/98 2307'50 1.3/17/98.---- - - - - -- 24037 -- EAGLE ENGRAVING -EMERGENCY . APPARATUS-MAINT.- S)CBA BRACKET STREAMLITE STRAP STRAP GRIP ACCT./INCIDENT BOARD P P PA T 0 Ir 148.60 249.45 453.30 181.92 164.70 lv396.35 164.70 Lj_l 1-166 REPAIR TO C-2 -2 -16 361.06 627.22 -40807 250200.- ESS BROTHERS &.SONS INC, --STOOL. FRAME-:-- BOX. GRATE, INNER-RI -40 ---------- Iss 4101308 1:1/17/98 260255 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY BRAKE ROTOR & CALIPER ASSM 275.93 - - - - -- CREDIT _s7OR RETURNED - ME1 CI-i 00 oo*. iz VOLJCHF:E2 -- ER/CHECK REGISTER PAGE 3 ----------- 11/13/4?8 10: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCH 6 6 FOR PERIOD 11 VOUCHER/ 2 CHECK CHECK 3 VENDOR VENDOR MBER--DATE ITEM NU NUMBER----- 4 NAME DESCRIPTION ITEM CHECK r5 j5 ______AMO(JNT 5 �_. .. 40009 11/1 260648 IST LINE BEVERAGE 7 - HONEY HILL VAN. CLASS.GHIR CHO 237.50 40810 11/17/98 270200 191 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO. INSTALL SENSOR SWITCH 70. 70.55 40811 11/17/98 300500 0 & K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 27.50 - SUPPLIES -- JANITORIAL 13 42. 67 , UNIFORMS-,&-CLO_THING 15 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL .4 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 11.20 27.50 �,ei UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 27-50 "PLIES -• JANITORIAL __-UN I FORITIS-&-CLOTti ING 39.11 • 12. ;211 SUPPLIES JANITORIAL 1, U14IFORMS CLOTHING 11.20 27.50 I ES-JANI-TOR JA 1 3 " d-% - UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 31.50 S 'UPPLIES - JANITORIAL 1 251 49.90 ____UNIFORlvjS -&-CLOTI-IING 27 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 281 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 41.93 27.50 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 1,4 W 27.50 SUPPLIES JANITORIAL 40.70 31 _MATS-_ UNIFORMS CLOTHING 1A UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 88.01 38.71 I JN I FORMS-&-CLOT141- 5�0 NG L;NIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.19 1 7! I ):-'F-'I.-ES -- JANITORIAL 1 cUl 11.20 j3S! L . I UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 7 _wlo_l 76.88 - ----- UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 49.84 0�07 40812 11/17/98 301075 GAMETIME BOARDS 139.42 40813 1 1/17/98 320265 GRAFIX SHOPPE 139-42 LEAF ON E2 31-75 - 31.75 40(.314----11/-17/98-..-.----320266---- GRAINGER 31o7va REC4-4ARGEAE-4,.-LA 4081�i 11/1.7/98 320300 GREEN VALUE NURSERY iiFr s. TREE IN: 75.00 1.00 40016 11/17/ 320860 H & L MESABI 75.00 CURB RUIqNER-CUi;:I.:i & DRIVER SIDE 1.145.09 400 .7- --11/17/98 340601 ,145.09 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE -TRAVEL - & 4021a 11/17/98 350940 HOME SPRAYEF*�S, WD-40 "09 HOSE 7 7 - SHOVEL 7 7. BATTERIES 7 7 7, 1 3 - VOUCHRE2 CITY OF" MAPL..EEWOOD 11/13/98 1O: 5 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTEM•. , PAGE 4 JZ6 1 ° 'OR PERIOD 11 VOUCHER/ 2 CHECK CHECK 3 VENDOR VENDOR ITEM 1 �t IJML '!•:------ DATi::� - - - - -- _ NUMIiEh--- - - - - -- - -- NAME__ _ -- --- - - - - -_ . -_- _ - -- - - - --- -- -- -- DESChIf�'T- IUN-- =- ITEM CHECK 14 I s - - -- - - -- - -- -- - - PICK __ -- -- - -- AI�IUi.1l�T AMOUNT. s - - -- - - AX, WOOD HAND LEVEL 79 . 70 -- ----- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - -- -- - - -- rlr,E -Ex - - - -- - - - -- -- x:: ,.0 4 a CONTACT CEMENT 11.66 o LATE CHARGE 10.00 282.79 � 11 40819 11/17/98 1, 370 075 HUGO'S TREE CARE TAKE DOWN DOXELDER TREE 766.80 - 12 t3 TREE REMOVAL 298.20 1 40820 11/17/98 14 380819 IOS CAPITAL COPIER LEASE 807. 241.38 1s COP IER LEASE: 20% 60.35 301.73 16 40821 11/17/98 17 380860 IMPERIAL, INC. �. AVIATOR # ADAPTERS 203.95 203.95 1s 0U21 -- -1,1 .�,�. ?1-9 90205 } NFOSOL)RC E INC 19 '�- • WI RFGT 44TER '1E; _ --f. -4- W ATE /A S rE4.SS 24 2 47-00- 40823 11/17/98 2, 400650 J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC. APPLIANCES RECYCLED 22 AJ'F�1Al�1C:�a --F C it 92.00 i �� gn 23 APPLIANCES RECYCLED 112.00 APPLIANCES RECYCLED 261.00 s Arft r?' ANCES_f uYCL.E '7.5. p l26 APPLIANCES RECYCLED 185.00 27 APPLIANCES`RECYCELED 115.00 - --APPL-I ANCES-RECYCLED 1 281 29 30 APPLIANCES RECYCLED 170 no 158.00 1,436.00 4 W- 3 410370- 31' KATH__COMPANIF� _TsY -F' NTS/PLUGS. CONII - � 3z LAMP. 144.86 193.45 'l 40825- 11/A,7/ -98 4 20150 I k i KINK CUSTOMErti -. ADM - -SERVICES---- DUPL_lCATING-COST I,6� J1 4p 13.3 DUPLICATING, COSTS 55.91 218.22 1 � 401326- .__11. /L7-/913 - - -. - -_- 430970- - KRECH'S & US INESS SYSTEI IS,_INC.-- riPR- LEXMAIi"50 -F'TR -- r 1 - 40827 11/17/98 �� 430980 KREINES & KREINES, INC. WIRELESS GUIDANCE PACKAGE ao; ------ - - - -_- _ - - - -- 40.00 40.00 r11; 40028 11/17/98 450250 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORt= ' TRAINING CARDS 1 =01't NEW AEDS - 1,011.75 1 9 .--- x.1/.1. 7/98.---. - -- 459555.- .-.. -LAWRENCE -SIGN --- .------------------ S 1,011 r7. - - - - -- 2 40830 11/17/98 gas 460800 LESCO , INC. MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 380.21 380.21 ::> 1 11 /1 - /' /9E3 • j17 490 �i00 LL1hiDSTEN , LANCE RE I NDURS'E MENT- -VISSA h'ITG - 12.08 12.08 ; -- -40332 -- - 11117193..- -__ - -- 501225 -- - -- MAC: QUEEN EQUIPMENT______. - --------- ADJ.DRIVE -- CI••IAIN Ol{. SWk;CI= •I�l °�. 408;3 a 11/17/98 510100 MAPLE LEAF' OFFICIALS ASSN. -_ _.______ -_ -_- VOL.:LEYIiAI OF'F °ICIAL.S ------------- 491.3b -L. 3 3,300.00 401334 11/17/913 51U'."�UO MAF'L_C °WOOD THAI {L• -`I °.Y - - - - -- -------- - - - - - -- -------- BIRTHDAY CAKES - - - -- BIRTHDAY C('1KEES 1b5. 0 35.74 200.74 1 G:: r ;a 11 / 17/913 511 b0U h1A5Y:3 G;i�I�;F' 1'•I�` RDWAI:,;II/ S()1= TWARE MA I NT--DI _C 98 - 1 ,1.340.75 1 , 840 75 VOUCHRE'2 _4034.9-1 1/.17/ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD _-STA R-T-CAR/04E CK-ELEC-SYSTEM PAGE 5 11/13/98 10:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER �/6 FOR 1:: 11 40850 11/17/98 I . VOUCHER/ NORTHERN AIRGAS MEDICAL OXYGEN 241.94 241.94 1 !41 2 3 CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 4 -WJNBE_JR-DATCz-- -_6617.55-NORTHERN -NAME _D1-i:SCRIP-T1ON, 71.-L4 51 40036 6 11/17/98 520500 MCGUIREE, MICHAEL PIEALSvLC)DGINGF'HONE.AIRF-OFiT 974.95 974.95 7 6 40837 11/17/98 530560 MERIT CHEVROLET DAMPENER 36.23 36.23 9 4 10 2741 3.14 -- 23-6-24 ill 40839 12 11/17/98 540770 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGERS 231.02 231.02 13 40840 14 11/17/98 542140 MINNESOTA FIRE SERVICE INSP. I SCHOOL-GERVAIS 35.00 35.00 15 0841--41/4-7/-9a 16 -542345 441NNESOTA--F2HOT0 171 40842 18 -_ 11/17/98 551350 MN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION M.O.U. PAPER SESSION 15 .00 15.00 1.4 40843 ;210 11/17/98 570090 MOGREN BROS. HARDWOOD MULCH 37.28 .741 21 2 7--,:z SOD C30D 1, 150. 20 8-62% 221 690340 OLSON ARNOLD G MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 1.02 MI. 28. 56 - -- __ 6 5 36.21 21 11/17/98 6911,300 OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS BLACK DIRT 18.11 2 i251 40844 26i 11/17/98 570092 MOGREN SOD FARMS. INC. SOD 698.91 698.91 271 8i 4OS45 - 1-1/1,7/98 -- -- 620704 --KYRON-MANtJFACTURING-CORF*-� -----SUPPLIES------W- _CE 50-5.24 29i 40846 30 11/17/98 630028 N.E.S.A. SOCCER REF'S NESA ORG. 1 1 31 321 40847 11/17/98 630775 NATURAL RESOURCES RESTORATION UNDESIREABLE VEG. REMOVAL 30664.86 33[ UNDESIREABLE VEG. REMOVAL 1,669.44 5 ; 341 40848 I 11/17/98 640810 NEWMA14 STGNP 15 _4034.9-1 1/.17/ _-STA R-T-CAR/04E CK-ELEC-SYSTEM 1 8"/. 123.46- 40850 11/17/98 661181 NORTHERN AIRGAS MEDICAL OXYGEN 241.94 241.94 1 !41 408,51. 11/17/98 661600 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS, CS, INC. RATCHET LOADI--R ---R 202.26 202.26 I 1'_'L--40052--_11/17/98 -_6617.55-NORTHERN --STATES _PuwEr,:-------22Q 71.-L4 1 441 2501 4.71 2741 3.14 1 315 63 7.60 474 119.38 1 491 sol 40853 11/17/98 .741 2 7--,:z 690340 OLSON ARNOLD G MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 1.02 MI. 28. 56 28.56 40854 11/17/98 6911,300 OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS H(.JJSE. COUPL I NG 489.55 489.55 4f.7(:3 5 11117198 710320 F:IEF: C0Mf:'(-iNY POP f7oR HALLOWEEN AT STA. 135.5 15 ~ CUT WEEDS AT MCKNIGHT/MORELAND 53.00 53.00 29 1 /13/98 10:51 87.00 VOUCHER/CFIECK REGISTER Y6 FOR PERIOD 11 I VOUCHER/ 3600 TON WASHED SAND 5 p 000. 00 l8 2 CHEKCK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK ZIPLOCK BAGS CANDY __ 63.86 6 RUFFIES ROLLUP 54.24 29.56 29.56 7 40857 11/17/98 720640 POWELL PHILIP RF ALARM RECEIVER 40.00 40.00 9 40858-14Z4-7498_ 1-07-50-PRAIRIE-MOON-NURSF-RY- C;RASSE,%--F-*E-TE.RSDN-C!P"DE--BOOK 20-00 29 90 12 40859 11/17/98 720765 PREFERRED BUILDERS 2437 SCHALLER DR. E 1 !41; 40869 11/17/98 840405 ST. PAUL, CITY OF 2437-SCHALLER-DR. E 9- 73 n09 73 13 14 - 40860 11/17/98 722300 PUMP AND METER SERVICE INC. 12 ROLLS THERMO GRAPH PAPER 72.84 72.134 16 40861 171 11/17/98 741600 RAMSEY COUNTY SEPT DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 16.19 40871 SEPT DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 166.24 STRATUS COMPUTER, INC. HARDWARE/S )OFT WARE MAINT -NOV 98 4 4 A7RV_l 19 20 40872 11/17/98 850685 SEPT DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 259.25 446.90 I F _ 1-00-oo 23. 40863 11/17/98 761312 ROCCO'S PIZZA PIZZA FOR STAND BY CREW 79.50 79.50 26 40864 11/17/98 762650 RUFF-CUT CUT WEEDS AT MCKNIGHT/MORELAND 53.00 53.00 29 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 87.00 176.59 3600 TON WASHED SAND 5 p 000. 00 l8 141 35 ZIPLOCK BAGS CANDY __ 63.86 RUFFIES ROLLUP 54.24 37 CHEETOS 80.97 456.01 !41; 40869 11/17/98 840405 ST. PAUL, CITY OF SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINT/RADIO 61.00 641.82 40871 11/17/98 843537 STRATUS COMPUTER, INC. HARDWARE/S )OFT WARE MAINT -NOV 98 4 4 40872 11/17/98 850685 SUZANNE'S CUISINE. INC, CATERED DINNER-FIRE DEPT 3 3,872.87 BITUMINOUS MATE'RIAL-S 392.60 CEEME'NT ROCK 288.89 5.681.49 - _--, ~ - ^ czr, OF nAPLsw000 U voucvsm/cvscx nsozarsn FOR PERIOD ll -^—'----- ----' PAGE 7 r2i, 1 VOUCHER/ 11/17/98 901300 UPPER MIDWEST SALES CO. SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 102.89 2 31 VIECK C CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 26 40882 11/17/98 910499 VASKO ROLL-OFF SERVICE RECYCLING 290.00 290.00 POP FOR DANCESCARDS, FROM STAF 51.27 29 4081-34 11/17/98 912100 VIRTUE PRINTING BLDG. PERMIT FORMS/NOTICE CARD 220.95 220.95 31 40885 11/17/98 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P. POP 17. 53 331 38.24 483.76 40875 11/17/9E) 86072,5 TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES. INC. Pt -IONE SUPPORT 22.80 22.80 42 00 40886 11/17/98 931830 WARMAN., ROBIN HALLOWEEN TRAIL & SPLASH 137.79 14 40877 11/17/98 861672 THE PARKNURSERY NURSERY ITEMS FOR STA. 4 429.31 429.31 960450 40878 11117198 890900 U.S.WEST COMMUNICATIONS 911 TARIFF EQUIP. I p 060. 58 l 408(30 11/17/98 900180 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE 3X000.00 3.000.00 r2i, 40801 11/17/98 901300 UPPER MIDWEST SALES CO. SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 102.89 24 ! SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 30.48 133.37 26 40882 11/17/98 910499 VASKO ROLL-OFF SERVICE RECYCLING 290.00 290.00 29 4081-34 11/17/98 912100 VIRTUE PRINTING BLDG. PERMIT FORMS/NOTICE CARD 220.95 220.95 31 40885 11/17/98 931300 WALSH, WILLIAM P. COMM. PLBG. INSP. 148.00 331 COMM. PLBG. INSP. 185.00 134 42 00 40886 11/17/98 931830 WARMAN., ROBIN HALLOWEEN TRAIL & SPLASH 137.79 36 40887 11/17/98 960450 XEROX CORI::40RATION DUPLICATING COSTS 29.84 DUPLICATING COSTS 35.98 '"'~L `"E""" 124,064.44 ' - — ------------------- - - —' -- - — CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD. CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 1120.49 DEHN,DEBORAH 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 1940.52 CARLE,JEANETTE E 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 2177.01 OSWALD,ERICK D 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 1626.52 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11 / 13 / 9 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT ALLENSPACH,SHERRY 325977 CARLSON,THERESE 1624.30 FAUST,DANIEL F 3303.74 ANDERSON,CAROLE J 1120.49 DEHN,DEBORAH 1440.92 HANGSLEBEN,RICHARD 1940.52 CARLE,JEANETTE E 1334.52 JAGOE,CAROL 1332.49 OLSON,SANDRA 965.49 POWELL,PHILIP 1552.31 ALDRIDGE,MARK 1883.25 BECKER,RONALD D 2426.68 BOHL,JOHN C 1916.43 FLOR,TIMOTHY 2207.27 KVAM,DAVID 1940.55 STEFFEN,SCOTT L 2361.15 YOUNGREN,JAMES 2156.12 EVERSON,PAUL 1683.01 FRASER,JOHN 2006.51 STAHNKE,JULIE A 1420.92 HAIDER,KENNETH G 3280.20 PRIEFER,WILLIAM 1714.62 LUNDSTEN,LANCE 2177.01 OSWALD,ERICK D 1468.92 DUCHARME,JOHN 1626.52 L' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 PECK, DENNIS L 1769e72 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 ANDERSON, BRUCE 292.0.70 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 MARUSKA , NJ[ARK A 19 3 3.8 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 GREW- HAYMAN,JANET M 773o 31 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 COLEMAN,MELINDA 2881.2 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 EKSTF;AND ,THOMAS G 17 81.7 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 ROBERTS , KENNETH 17 4 8.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 EASTMAN , THOMAS E 2 0 0 8.0 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 HURLEY , STEPHEN 2066959 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J 19 9 9.8 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 EDGE , DOUGLAS 1433972 3.72 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 CROSSON LINDA � 1415.4 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 LIVINGSTON JOYC � E I' 788.72 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 / 3/98 KNAUSS,PETER 703932 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 PALMA,STEVEN 1972941 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 JOHNSON,KEVIN 1910.52 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 WARMANIROBIN 915.73 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 JENS EN , MATTHEW 7 9 8.2 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 LE , SHERYL 2 8 4 9.9 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA A 2185.24 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 ROSSBACH,GEORGE 370.2 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 LUTZ,DAVID P DIRECT DEPOSIT 1508.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 SCHLINGNJ[AN, PAUL 171 1718o62 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 FARR, DIANE M 2 4 9 .80 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 VORWERK, ROBERT E 1986.52 tv] CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13J98 DIRECT DEPOSIT '11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11 / 13 / 9 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 EMPLOYEE NAME NAGEL,BRYAN GUILFOILE,KAREN E HELLE,KERRY CARVER,NICHOLAS N OSTER,ANDREA J ANDREWS ,SCOTT A RUNNING,ROBERT SAVAGEAU I STEPHEN D BARTEL,DENISE CARLSON,DALE MARTINSON,CAROL F HIEBERT,STEVEN DUNN,ALICE ANZALDI,MANDY CORNER,AMY L STEVENS,MARY CATHERINE HORSNELL,JUDITH A SEEGER,GERALD F MOREHEAD,JESSICA R STILL,VERNON T HUTCHINSON,ANN E COLEMAN,PHILIP BELDE,STANLEY ATKINS,KATHERINE FRY,PATRICIA AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 1500992 1924.62 1791.14 1748.92 1420.92 2202.80 1420.93 115 2.12 40.50 325.77 1649.89 1784.92 1998.35 77.29 54.75 36.40 953.50 280.59 139.85 1899.32 1675.42 407.43 1784.92 770.41 1363.32 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER - - - - -- CHECK DATE ---- - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ AMOUNT ------ DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 - - - - -- RENSLOW, RITA -------- - - - - -- 101936 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 BAKKE , LONN A 14 3 5.3 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 BERGERON, JOSEPH A 2.08 8.9 8 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 BOWMAN ,RICK A 2 0 5 6.4 6 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11 13 9 8 CAVETT CHRISTOPHER M 2 0 6 5.8 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 KANE , MI CHAEL R 19 3 3.8 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 KOPPEN , MARVIN 3 2 5.7 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 CHRISTENSEN,JODIE D 378991 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 STAPLES,PAULINE 2261.88 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 KITTRIDGE , KEVIN L 3 2 5.7 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 WASH , MATTHEW G 3 2.5 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 PIKE , GARY K 12 6 0.9 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 I CKES , SHERI 119 3.0 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 THOMALLA, DAVID J 2 8 02.2 9 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DIRKSWAGER, COLLEEN 16 2 4.6 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 HEINZ,STEPHEN J 1899.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 NELSON,JEAN 909.60 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 KELLY,LISA 730.34 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 TET ZLAFF , JUDY A 6 6 7.01 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 GOPLEN, NICHOLAS P 2 6 6.8 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 WINGER, DONALD S 3 010.7 7 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 PARR, GAIL L 7 9.6 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 URBANSKI,HOLLY S 1223.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 ZWIEG,SUSAN C. 1394.52 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 BAUMAN,GAYLE L 1881.74 !101 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 SMITH, CASSANDRA L 12 67.81 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 SKRYPEK , JOSHUA L 488925 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 KELSEY , CONNIE L 585e94 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 CASARE Z , GINA 12 2 8.12 , DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 RANICK JOHN J � 2156912 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 HERBERT,MICHAEL J 1951.70 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 X;ARIS, FLINT D 2113.72 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 STAFNE,GREGORY L 1916.78 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 STOCKTON,DERRELL T 1899.32 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 MELANDER,JON A 2232.90 DIRECT DEPOSIT DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 ROSSMAN, DAVID A 17 8 8.6 5 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 FLAUGHER, JAYME L 14 8 7.19 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 MEYER, GERALD W 15 8 0.12 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 THOMAS —JR, STEVEN 1433972 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 PRIEBE WILLIAM , 1705.72 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M 1420.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 11/13/98 SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES 1460.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 68937 11/13/98 ERICSON,MICHAEL A 2264.23 68938 11/13/98 McGUIRE,MICHAEL A 3953.17 68939 11/13/98 ZICK,LINDA 460.00 68940 11/13/98 WHITE,BARRY T 82.50 68941 11/13/98 CUDE,LARRY J 369.15 68942 11/13/98 DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J 229.89 68943 11/13/98 SHELLEDY,DAWN M 88.00 68944 11/13/98 JACKSON,MARY L 1132.12 �z CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER ------- - - - - -- CHECK DATE ---- - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ AMOUNT 68945 11/13/98 - - - - -- MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE -------- - - - - -- 1536.76 68946 11/13/98 NIVEN,AMY S 170.00 68947 11/13/98 JOHNSON,BONNIE 780919 68948 11/13/98 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1417.84 68949 11/13/98 ANDERSON,ELSIE 108.88 68.950 11/13/98 BARTELT,JOAN 110.50 68951 11/13/98 BEHM, GERALD F. 100.75 68952 11/13/98 BELLAND, JAIME H. 107.25 68953 11/13/98 BERGER,CAROLE 107.25 68954 11/13/98 BERGER,MERVIN 126900 68955 11/13/98 BUNDE,JENNETTE .100.75 68956 11/13/98 BUTTON,JOAN 84.50 6.8957 11/13/98 CAHANES,LUCILLE 129.50 68958. 11/13/98 CARRJOAN 110.50 68959 11/13/98 COTTRELL,JOAN 110.50 68960 11/13/98 DEHEN,VIRGINIA 104900 68961 11/13/98 DICKSON,-HELEN 113.75 68962 11/13/98 DITTEL,KATHLEEN 97.60 68963 11/13/98 DORNFELD, GRACE K. 123.50 68964 11/13/98 DOTSON,DEBRA R 66.63 689 -65 11/13/98 DUCHARME,FRED 136950 68966 11/13/98 DUCHARME,MARGARET 107.25 68967 11/13/98 DUELLMAN,AUDREY 115950 68968 11/13/98 EARLEY,MARGARET 112.00 68969 11/13/98 EDDY,BETTY 117.00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER ------ - - - -- CHECK DATE ---- - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ AMOUNT - 68970 - 11/13/98 - - - - -- EICKHOFF,CAROLYN -------- - - - - -- 110.50 68971 11/13/98 ERICKSON,PHYLLIS 112900 68972 11/13/98 FALENZER,CATHERINE 110.50 68973 11/13/98 FISCHER,LORRAINE 119000 68974 11/13/98 FISCHER,MARY 110.50 68975 11/13/98 FITZGERALD, DELORES M. 110.50 68976 11/13/98 FOSBURGH,ANNE 126.00 68977 11/13/98 GALLAGHER,BARBARA 107.25 68978 11/13/98 GALLAGHER,JOHN F 102.38 68979 11/13/98 GOLASKI,DIANE 120.25 68980 11/13/98 HAAS,ELIZABETH 119000 68981 11/13/98 HAAS,THEODORE 113.75 68982 11/13/98 HENRY, JOHN 117.00 68983 11/13/98 HORTON,SHIRLEE 100.75 68,984 11/13/98 IVERSEN,MILDRED 110.50 68985 11/13/98 KING,HELEN 100.75 68 11/13/98 KOLASA,JOAN 107.25 68987 11/13/98 KOLASA,JOSEPH 100.75 68988 11/13/98 LACASSE,ANNETTE 102.38 68989 11/13/98 LIEDER,MARY LOU 113.75 68990 11/13/98 LOFGREN,DELORES 100.75 68991 11/13/98 LOFGREN,RICHARD 122950 68992 11/13/98 LUTTRELL,SHIRLEY 115.50 68993 11/13/98 MANDERS,ROSE MARIE 99.13 68994 11/13/98 MOSSONG,BETTY 110050 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER ------ - - - - -- CHECK DATE ---- - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 68995 - 11/13/98 ------------------------ - - - - -- NIETERS,LOUISE -------- - - - - -- 104.00 68996 11/13/98 OGILVIE,BEVERLY 117.00 68997 11/13/98 PETSCHEL.,LORRAINE 108.88 68998 11/13/98 PLEAU,DARLA 113.75 68999 `11/13/98 ROSAUER,LORRAINE 107.25 69900 11/13/98 RUDEEN,ELAINE 117900 6.9001 11/13/98 SALO, MARIAN 104.00 6.9002 11/13/98 SKLUZACEK, EVELYN M. 117.00 69003 11/13/98 SUPAN,KATHLEEN 100975 69004 11/13/98 THOMPSON,MILO 112.00 69005 11/13/98 THOMPSON,PATRICIA 115.50 69006 11/13/98 TOLBERT,D- FRANKLIN 110.50 69007 11/13/98 TUCKER, CECILIA K. 117900 69008 11/13/98 WIDHOLM,JUDY 112.00 69G09 11/13/98 WIEGERT,.DONALD 127.75 69010 11/13/98 WIEGERT,ELSIE 119.00 69011 11/13/98 PALANK,MARY KAY 1625.94 69012 11/13/98 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1578.03 69013 11/13/98 RYAN,MICHAEL 2720.02 69014 11/13/98 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1579955 69015 11/13/98 BARTZ,PAUL 1610.52 69016 11/13/98 HALWEG,KEVIN R 2752.15 69017 11/13/98 KONG,TOMMY T 576.00 69018 11/13/98 LOU,YEN LIN 40.00 69019 11/13/98 MACFARLANE,MELVIN R 1405.28 zs CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 69020 11/13/98 RABBETT,KEVIN 1892992 69021 11/13/98 RAZSKAZOFF,DALE 1899932 69022 11/13/98 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 1723.74 690`23 11/13/98 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 1873972 69024 11/ , 13/98 WATCZAK,LAURA 1823.32 69025 11/13/98 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 1943932 69026 11/13/98 HALE,,THOMAS M 1290.06 69- -027 11/13/98 MEEHAN,JAMES 2107988 69028 11/13/98 THIENES,PAUL 1872.12 69029 11/13/98 GERVAIS- JR,CLARENCE N 38.50 69030 11/13/98 BOYER,SCOTT K 1699988 69031 11/13/98 DOYSCHER,LYNN M 52.72 69032 11/13/98 FEHR,JOSEPH P 1784.22 a 69033 11/13/98 FOLENDORF,MICHELLE L 158.16 69034 11/13/98 HILL,CHRISTY R 105.44 69035 11/13/98 LAFFERTY,WALTER 1394.52 69036 11/13/98 MAUSTON,KENNETH L 105.44 69037 11/13/98 MAYNARD,WILLIAM J 158.16 69038 11/13./98 MELANDER,SCOTT A 158.16 69039 11/13/98 RABINE,JANET L 1420992 69040 11/13/98 HEWITT,JOEL A 2559.34 69041 11/13/98 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1473.72 69042 11/13/98 DARST, JAMES 1441.72 69043 11/13/98 FREBERG,RONALD L 1520.12 69044 11/13/98 ELIAS,JAMES G 2127911 IV CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER 69045 69046 690.47 69048 69049 69,050 6 905 1 69052 69053 69054 69055 69056 69057 69058 69059 69060 69061 69062 690.63 69064 69065 69066 69067 69068 69069 CHECK DATE 11/13/98 11./13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13./98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT LINDBLOM,RANDAL 1735.93 SIMMONS,LARA R 114.75 ANDERSON,ROBERT S 1460992 EDSON,DAVID B 1488.12 HELEY,ROLAND B 1488.12 HINNENKAMP,GARY 172 1.81 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 1433.72 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 1460.92 LARSON,SHERRI A 244.38 MACY,RITA 194.25 MCCUSKER,ELIZABETH A MANNING 56925 THOMPSON,DEBRA J 404.21 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1394.52 ANDERSON,EVERETT 549.63 OLSON,ARNOLD G 545.00 OSTROM,MARJORIE 2084.22 WENGER,ROBERT J 1737.72 BALLESTRAZZE,THAD M 173.65 BRANDSTROM,JULIET M 358.13 BRANDSTROM,RYAN M. 114.00 CHURCHILL,DAVID R 43.00 CHURCHILL,MATT H 21.50 CROTHERS,CHAD B 96.75 FINN.,GREGORY S 1197.02 FLUG,ELAINE R 171.55 2 AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 27.50 20.00 1046.40 157.50 44.00 43.00 30.88 136.00 53.75 64.50 43.00 27.00 86.00 1138.62 258.40 60.00 64.50 20.00 16.60 60.00 100.50 1491.32 1488.72 2010o62 1509.34 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 69070 11/13/98 FLUG,MEGAN L 69071 11/13/98 FOSSE,THOMAS C 69072 11/13/98 GRAF ,MICHAEL 69073 11/13/98 HANGGI,KATHLEEN M 69074 :11/13/98 JANSEN,DAVID S 69075 11/13/98 KLEM,JOSH H 69076 11/13/98 MCBRIDE,PATRICK D 69077 11/13/98 PEASLEY,ROLAND P 69078 11/13/98 PREW,JOHN M 69079 11/13/98 PURCELL,RYAN P 69080 11/13/98 RYDEEN,BENJAMIN D 69081 11/13/98 RYDEEN,SARAH 69082 11/13/98 SPENCER,WILLIAM 69083 11/13/98 STIEN,MARY 69084 11/13/98 STIEN,NATHANIEL 69085 11/13/98 TRILL,ERIN 69086 11/13/98 VERHULST,NEAL M 69087 .11/13/98 VERHULST,RYAN J 69088 11/13/98 VOGEL,PAUL R 69089 11/13/98 WALKER,BRADLEY M 69090 11/13/98 WARMAN,KATHRYN 69091 11/13/98 BREHEIM,ROGER W 69092 11/13/98 GERMAIN,DAVID 69093 11/13/98 NADEAU,EDWARD A 69094 11/13/98 NORDQUIST,RICHARD AMOUNT -------- - - - - -- 27.50 20.00 1046.40 157.50 44.00 43.00 30.88 136.00 53.75 64.50 43.00 27.00 86.00 1138.62 258.40 60.00 64.50 20.00 16.60 60.00 100.50 1491.32 1488.72 2010o62 1509.34 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 69095 11/13/98 SCHULTZ,SCOTT M 1139.32 690-96 11/13/98 COONS,MELISSA 668.69 69097 11/13/98 GLASS,JEAN 813.68 69098 11/13/98 HOIUM,SHEILA 888.53 69099 11/13/98 HORWATH,RONALD J 569.46 69100 11/13/98 MICHALSKI,ANDREW M 78.00 69101 11/13/98 NEAMY,MARK W 142.80 69102 11/13/98 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 1061.82 69103 11/13/98 SCHOEBERL,KAYLENE M 358.60 69104 11/13/98 SHOBERG,CARY J 417.08 69105 11/13/98 ABRAHAMSON,BRYAN K 214.50 69106 11/13/98 ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L. 83.75 69107 11/13/98 ANDERSON,JULIE M 135.20 69108 11/13/98 BADEN,ALISON L 170.85 69109 11/13/98 BADEN,MATHIAS 266.04 69110 11/13/98 BERINGER,JASON E 140.00 69111 11/13/98 BITTNER,KATIE C 281.96 69112 11/13/98 CONLIN,PAMELA 40.50 69113 11/13/98 COOPER,JOSEPH W 162.50 69114 11/13/98 DAMROW,KELLY C 35.75 69115 11/13/98 ERICKSON,CAROL A 18000 69116 11/13/98 FONTAINE,ANTHONY 94.25 69117 11/13/98 FRETZ,SARAH J 48.75 69118 11/13/98 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 45.63 69119 11/13/98 HAGSTROM,LINDSEY S 71950 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 6912 11 / 13 / 9 8 HAWKE , RYAN A 212996 69121 11/13/98 HAWKINS, LISA A 151.60 69122 11/13/98 HEDLUND,LAUREL R 52.00 69123 11/13/98 HEIM,ANDREA J 336.05 69124 11/13/98 HOLMGREN,LEAH M 81000 69125 11/13/98 HOULE,DENISE L 72.80 69126 11 / 13 / 9 8 HUPPERT , ERIN M 17 2.02 69127 11/13/98 IKHAML,JOHN 148.00 69128 11/13/98 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 255950 69129 11/13/98 JOHNSON,ROLLAND H 134.88 69130 11/13/98 JOHNSON,STETSON 97.88 69131 11/13/98 JOHNSON,SUSAN M 42900 69132 11/13/98 JOVONOVICH,TODD R 146.20 69133 11/13/98 KOEHNEN,AMY 36.00 69134 11/13/98 KOEHNEN,MARY B 352.50 69135 11/13/98 KOEPKE,CHARLES E 76.38 69136 11/13/98 KRENN,CAMILLE A 57.75 69137 :11/13/98 KROB CHWASTEK,JUDY F 35.00 69138 11/13/98 KUHL,SCOTT A 139.75 69139 11/13/98 MAGNUSON,BETH M 127.75 69140 11/13/98 MALONE,BRANDON M 78.00 69141 11/13/98 MEISEL,TAMBREY 58.36 69142 11/13/98 MEYER,HEATHER ANN 19.50 69143 11/13/98 MOREHEAD,PHILIP L 48.00 69144 11/13/98 MOTZ,ERIN M 143.00 �� 1 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 69145 11/13/98 SCHLUETER,LOUISE E 36950 69146 11/13/98 SELIN,JASON M 157.20 69147 11/13/98 SHERRILL,MASON D 122.81 69148 11/13/98 SMITLEY,SHARON L 132.10 69149 ' '11 / 13 / 9 8 :_SWANER , JESSICA 113.15 69150 11/13/98 TIBODEAU,HEATHER J 110.29 69151 11/13/98 TOURTELOTTE,MARYN J 134.88 69152 11/13/98 WARMAN,JOANNE M 234.84 69153 11/13/9.8 WARNER,CAROLYN 141025 69154 11/13/98 WEDES,CARYL H 133.50 69155 11/13/98 WILLIAMS,KELLY M 658932 69156 11/13/98 WOODMAN,ALICE E 123.60 69157 11/13/98 BOSLEY,CAROL 100.46 69158 11/13/98 DISKERUD,HEATHER A 185.94 69159 11/13/98 FLEMING,KATHY A 262.50 69160 11/13/98 GLASS I GILLIAN 48.00 69161 11/13/98 MACIOCH,AMY L 18.00 69162 11/13/98 MALDONADO,ANGELA M 48900 69163 11/13/98 PRICE,JENNIFER L 53.63 69164 11/13/98 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 190000 69165 11/13/98 SPANGLER,EDNA E 177.50 69166 11/13/98 WHITE,CHRISTOPHER B 555900 69167 11/13/98 ANTON,SARAH E 176940 69168 11/13/98 BEHAN,JAMES 1345.55 69169 11/13/98 BLAKESLEY, JEFFERY DEAN 128900 p - AN rS, -k CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER ------ - - - - -- 69170 69171 69172 69173 69174 69175 69176 69177 69.178 69179 69180 6918.1 69182 69183 69184 69185 69186 69187 69188 69189 69190 CHECK DATE 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/ 13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 11/13/98 EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ AMOUNT - - - - -- CALLEN,KATIE E -------- - - - - -- 75900 CHAPEAU,GREG M 244.13 FULLER,AMY R 97.65 HEMPFER,NICHOLAS W 60.00 JAHN,DAVID J 1365917 KASSON,JULIE E 123.00 KOSKI,JOHN F 584.98 KYRK,BREANNA K 110.26 LONETTI,JAMES F 562966 MATTESON,FRANK M 88.50 PRINS,KELLY M 93900 SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M 173.25 STEINHORST, JEFFREY 261.10 STEWART,MONTENESE D 138900 SWANSON,LYLE 1507.68 SWANSON,SARAH C 175.50 SWANSON,VERONICA 968992 YOUNG,DILLON J 106908 AICHELE,CRAIG J 797954 MULVANEY,DENNIS M 1628.12 PRIEM, STEVEN A. 1314.60 295999.83 3z AGENDA NO. Gz AGENDA REPORT .Action by c ounc il : TO: City Manager Endorsed..... Modified.,. FROM: Finance Director Re, eater,„ Date RE: FINANCIAL TRANSFERS FOR UNASSESSED UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS DATE: November 10, 1998 Transfers are made annually from the Sewer Fund and Water Fund to the Debt Service Funds to amortize the cost of unassessed water and sewer improvements over the terms of the bonds that were issued to finance the improvements. When the tax levy for 1998 was adopted, reductions were made in the debt service tax levies for the anticipated transfers scheduled for 1998. Therefore, the following transfers are recommended: FROM $6 Water Fund 2,050 Sewer Fund 67,720 Water Fund 33,460 Water Fund $109,240 TO DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 1979 Bonds (316) 1979 Bonds (316) 1992 Bonds (325) 1990 Bonds (322) hu FinSec C:\0ffice \WPWin \Agenda \TferUt1.98 AGENDA NO. & J AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: RE. DATE: Finance Director and Community Development Director Action by Cou Endorsed.... Modify. ed..,,..,......., Rej ected.,,_,�.,,.,,,...,. bate INCREASE IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SERVICE CHARGES November 16, 1998 INTRODUCTION It is proposed that the Community Development Department service charges be increased b 2.6 % g Y effective January 1, 1999. BACKGROUND It has been past practice to raise service charges annually to keep up with inflation. In 1993 a User Fee Study was completed for the Community Development Department to insure that service charges finance an appropriate portion of the service costs. The User Fee Study report contained recommendations on 50 individual license/permit fees and service charges for the Community Development Department. For each item, it had information on the unit volume, current fee, costs to provide the service, recommended fee, p hase -in schedule covering five years for the recommended fee, estimated increased revenue from the recommended fee and subsidy amount after the recommended fee is phased in. On 5-24-93, the Council approved the recommended fees for 1993. There have been annual increases in the service charges since then. At this time, it would be appropriate to increase all Community Development Department fees b p p y 2.6 % to keep up with inflation. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council (1) approve revisions in Community Development Department license /permit fees and services charges listed in Exhibit A effective January 1, 1999 and (2) approve first reading of an ordinance (Exhibit B) to increase the planning fees. PARNANCE\WPIAGNMERFEELD November 16, 1998 Exhibit A Page 1 of 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SERVICE CHARGES Estimated Annual 1 -1 -97 1 -1 -98 1 -1 -99 Volume Fee Fee Fee PLANNING FEES (Set by Ordinance): Zone Change 1 $591 * $690 * $708 Conditional Use Permit: R1 and R2 1 200 * 206 * 211 Other 11 623 * 733 * 752 Conditional Use Permit Revision: Rl and R2 1 40 * 41 * 42 Other 2 129 * 147 * 151 Variances: R1 and R2 7 118 * 135 * 139 Other 5 619 753 * 773 Vacations: R1 and R2 10 126 * 130 * 133 Other 2 416 * 505 * 518 Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created): Rl and R2 11 69 71 73 Other 1 222 268 275 Home Occupations: Initial 2 131 150 154 Renewal 5 49 50 51 Sign Erection Permit 100 21 21 22 Billboard Erection Permit 1 79 81 83 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 3 860 * 1,004 * 1 Code Amendment 1 619 753 773 Planed Unit Development 1 957 * 1 * 1 Preliminary Plat 7 1 1 1 Preliminary Plat Revision or Time Extension 9 168 196 201 Final Plat 5 282 338 347 Plus a surcharge for each affected property to pay for the County's filing fee for resolutions PARNANCEMP \AGN\USERFEE.CD November 16, 1998 L Exhibit A Page 2 of 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SERVICE CHARGES Estimated Annual 1 -1 -97 1 -1 -98 1 -1 -99 Volume Fee Fee Fee Time Extensions /Renewals 9 119 123 126 Billboard License 1 307 316 324 LICENSES DUE JANUARY 1st Contractors License 600 97 100 103 Motels 1 - 15 Units 1 93 96 98 16 - 35 Units 2 126 130 133 36 - 100 Units 1 232 239 245 Over 100 Units 2 266 274 281 Special Food Handling Establishment 35 76 79 81 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGE Woodlot Alteration Permit 1 13 13 14 Building Relocation 5 605 720 739 .Moving Permit 3 45 47 48 Community Design Review Board: R1 & R2 2 161 166 170 Other 16 508 606 622 =Demolition Permit 1 54 56 57 Mobile Home Permit 1 34 35 36 On -Site Sewage Systems 6 50 59 61 Truth -In- Housing Filing Fee 100 25 26 27 Truth -In- Housing Evaluators License 29 90 93 95 Zoning Compliance Letter 21 22 Exhibit A Page 3 of 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SERVICE CHARGES Estimated Annual 1 -1 -97 1 -1 -98 1 -1 -99 Volume Fee Fee Fee PUBLICATIONS (Includes Sales Tax): Zoning Code 5 5 6 Platting Code 2 2 3 Sign Code 2 2 3 Comprehensive Plan 13 14 15 Zoning Map 2 10 11 City Map 2 2 3 Section Map 2 2 3 Planning Commission or Community Design Review Board: Minutes -Per Year 14 14 15 Agenda Packet -Per Year 97 100 103 Property Owner List 56 58 60 Exhibit B ORDINANCE NO. PLANNING FEES Section 1.Section 36 -26 of the Zoning Code of the City of Maplewood is hereby amended as follows: Section 36- 26.Fees.The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required: Zone Change $708 Conditional Use Permit: R1 & R2 211 Other 752 Conditional Use Permit Revision: R1 and R2 42 Other 151 Variances: R1 and R2 139 Other 773 Vacations: R1 and R2 133 Other 518 Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created): R1 and R2 73 Other 275 Home Occupation Permit (initial permit) 154 (annual renewal) 51 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1 Code Amendment 773 Planned Unit Development 1 Preliminary Plat 17273 Preliminary Plat Revision or Time Extension 201 Final Plat 347 Time Extensions /Renewals 126 Section 2. Section 36 - 258 of the sign code is amended as follows: Section 36 - 258.Fees. (1) A sign erection permit fee(except for billboards)shall be $22. (2) The fee for erection of billboards shall be $83. (3) The annual license fee for billboards shall be $324. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 1999. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on .1998. Attest: Clerk Mayor Ayes- - Nayes-- '61 AGENDA NO. � `l AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: INCREASE IN MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES DATE: November 3, 1998 INTRODUCTION Action by Council: Endorsed. M o d i f i e d , , . ...... � . ,, , � . , Re j e c t e d,..... Date. It is proposed that the attached miscellaneous service charges be increased by 2.6 % effective January 1, 1999. BACKGROUND It has been past practice to raise service charges annually to keep up with inflation. Attached is a listing of present and proposed fees. The proposed fees represent a 2.6 % increase as anticipated in the 1999 Proposed Budget. Most fees are rounded off to the nearest $1 except for fees in excess of $1,000 which are rounded off to the nearest $50. For fees rounded off to the nearest $1, the minimum annual increase proposed each year is usually $1. Excluded from this report are Community Development Department and City Clerk Department service charges as these fees are covered in separate reports. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council increase the attached miscellaneous service charges b g Y 2.6 % effective January 1, 1999 to keep up with inflation. hu Attachment PAFINANCE \WP\AGN \MISC.CHG GENERAL SERVICE CHARGES I I 1997 Fee I 1998 Fee I 1999 Fee Dog /Cat Impound Fee $28 $29 25 -100* 156 12 10 2,850 1% 28 * ** 2,850 1% 28 * ** 5,600 50 ** $30 25 -100* 160 13 11 2,900 1 28 * ** 2,900 1 2800 * ** 5 50 ** False Alarm Charge 25 -100* Liquor License - Temporary On -Sale -Per Day 151 Occupancy Permit 12 Police Accident Report Copies 10 Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Financing - CommerciaL Amount Paid with Application (non - refundable) 2,750 Base Charge (% of bond issue) 1% Maximum (in addition to application fee) 28,600 * ** Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Financing - Residential (Multiple - Family Dwellings): Amount paid with application (non - refundable) 2 Base Charge (% of bond issue) 1% Maximum (in addition to application fee) 28 * ** Tax Increment Financing: Application Fee (non- refundable) 5,450 Temporary Gambling Permit -Per Day 50 ** * Set by ordinance adopted 8 -28 -95 * * Set by ordinance adopted 9 -10 -90 * ** Set by Council on 9 -23 -96 PAFINANCE \WP\AGN \MISC.CHG AGENDA NO. & s Action by Council Endorsed.,._____, Modified._.,,_,_,,, .- AGENDA REPORT Rejected Date TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director )22?� RE: CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT SEWER SERVICE BILLS DATE: November 16,1998 Unpaid balances remain on four sewer service bills. In most cases a payment plan agreement was made but the property owners have not made sufficient payments. Letters were sent to them indicating that payments had to be made or their unpaid bills would be certified to Ramsey County for collection with property taxes. No responses to the letters were received. Therefore, it is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted. P: \FINANCE \WP \98SEWBIL.WPD RESOLUTION RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the following delinquent sewer service bills for certification against the tax levy f said property year 1998 collectible i y • p p o owners for the y n 1999 and which includes interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) on the total amount for one year: STREET ADDRESS PROPERTY AMOUNT IDENTIFICATION 2272 Craig Place 11- 29 -22 -34 -0031 $944.04 1376 Sophia Street 15- 29 -22 -33 -0103 $680.94 2494 Harvester Avenue 25- 29 -22 -31 -0001 $52.16 3001 Chippewa Court North 01- 29 -22 -21 -0061 $815.08 TOTAL $2,492.22 Agenda Item Gb Aotion by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorsed........ Modify. e TO: City Manager Re j . ecte c FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner ate SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review- Countryside Volkswagen/Saab g LOCATION: 1180 Highway 36 East DATE: November 16, 1998 INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit (CUP) at 1180 Highway 36 East is due for review. The CUP allows the expanded operation of the motor vehicle maintenance and repair garages. This site is occupied by Countryside Volkswagen /Saab. Refer to pages 2 -3. BACKGROUND January 9, 1995: The city council granted the CUP and approved the expansion of Countryside VW's maintenance, service, sales and showroom space. Refer to the minutes on page 4. The council also approved a right -of -way vacation resolution assigning an 84- by 17.5 -foot section of frontage along Highway 36 to Countryside VW. February 12, 1996: The city council reviewed the CUP and required review again in one year. March 25, 1996: The city council granted sign variances to Countryside VW to install two additional freestanding signs and one freestanding sign that would be 3.5 feet taller than the allowed height of 25 feet. February 10, 1997 and September 8, 1997: The city council reviewed the CUP and required a later inspection to check on the progress. oiscussioN The applicant has completed all required work and has met the conditions of approval. The city council should review this CUP again only if a problem arises or if the property owner proposes any changes to the buildings or site. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit at 1180 Highway 36 East again only if a problem arises or if the property owner proposes any changes to the buildings or site. p:sec9lc'sidev 2.cup Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. 1/9/95 City Council Minutes Attachment 1 `� , KOHIWW AVE. F ` J CDUIITY R0r1D G C PALM CONNOR C��, a: A N�OR n R. DE1AVA � � �.,'"� BROOKS AV r IC�MK� • AVE. VIKING DR. � , D O ` o � d LAURIE RD. � W 3 LAURIE CT. � � i � �� R� � � Q Z SAND URST Y O JUNCT?ON AVE B to evroKr cr. � �o � BURKE AV J d BuiMCE AVE. o (1) CKW BERS ST.-. (t AVM. ELDRIpCE AV �4 ° � ►Igti,T LA. � ELDR IDLE AVE. � r' BEL1r10NT j �yt R� t+ A,vE BEllrO►�tT AVE. `v_ SKILL � � AV E SKILL 14kN AVE. SKILLI�tAN AV. KENtiv 00D E W o �+ re Pam AN AV. Q Lft :LLwOOD AVE. i'E NTD+i AVE.. � El t ' > art AV E. ° v tg fRr5WE AvE � � � � � ►�:�'' IL �µl�l. 0, RtP �1f z '� OC W = YIroMf1w Q-' ke SO PH {A O O � �p lO 411 � t' v � SO H�► AVE � r LOCATION MAP 2 N W cr BROJAKS � - Gf SQc I TIWT • ,» • R GERV AJS AVE. }. G ERVAIS GRAND'vlM oor . •, • • P 1� wy AVE. . % • oo VIKING DR. .t •, . ,. � SHERREN AVE. . ow ♦� 111, % ..: . ..• • . • .. • 10 .. V COPE L' IC�MK� • AVE. VIKING DR. � , D O ` o � d LAURIE RD. � W 3 LAURIE CT. � � i � �� R� � � Q Z SAND URST Y O JUNCT?ON AVE B to evroKr cr. � �o � BURKE AV J d BuiMCE AVE. o (1) CKW BERS ST.-. (t AVM. ELDRIpCE AV �4 ° � ►Igti,T LA. � ELDR IDLE AVE. � r' BEL1r10NT j �yt R� t+ A,vE BEllrO►�tT AVE. `v_ SKILL � � AV E SKILL 14kN AVE. SKILLI�tAN AV. KENtiv 00D E W o �+ re Pam AN AV. Q Lft :LLwOOD AVE. i'E NTD+i AVE.. � El t ' > art AV E. ° v tg fRr5WE AvE � � � � � ►�:�'' IL �µl�l. 0, RtP �1f z '� OC W = YIroMf1w Q-' ke SO PH {A O O � �p lO 411 � t' v � SO H�► AVE � r LOCATION MAP 2 N Attachment 2 - F MMWM� • Al •- l ot if 1 ' l 'N l ...'I ........ ...... ��- �' S 1 � ..;... ;✓� ... � Ali � j . • . .� * ' 1 1 1 1 I I I Is lei F � � �' _ - ---- -- � ! --- �� cis • ` � Z - i ,•� _ .10 '.� r I U ll SITE PLAN 4 N Attachment 3 • Approval is. subject to the following conditions: • follow the site tan approved by the City. The • 1. All construction shall fo plan Director of Co y P Co mmunity Devel may approve minor change n must be started within one year of Council 2. The pro osed construction this deadline r va or the erini t shall end. The Council may ext app o P for one year. • number of parking spaces, provided that all 3. The City waives the required u P a Code shall be parked on a paved parking lot. (This is vehicles P t re for expanding the paved requirement.) The City must approve any plans p 9 q limit the vehicles stored or displayed on .. . p arki ng areas. The C� ty may 1 i t ..p � here is insufficient on site parking. `�the� site -i f the. City decides that t • maintain screening a 4. The p roperty owner shall install and maint 9 long all south • p • p Co mmunity Des Review board must l ot l nes to meet the City Code. The Co y 9 approve the screening plan. e 5. There shall be no vehicle access, except emergency vehicles, to or from Duluth Street. 6. All dui»psters on the site shall be enclosed as required by City Code. 7. The Cit y Council shall review this permit in one year. • t limitation on ingress /egress on Duluth Street is 8. Continuation of t only for public s afety vehicles and is not for trucks and comme rcial traffic. p Councilmember.Ko en Ayes all Seconded by P g s' ' r .• 4 Agenda itetn MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner .Action by Council, SUBJECT: 1 cil , 998 Comprehensive Plan Update DATE: November 12, 1998 Endorsed...... Modified,,.,,,... Rei.ecte -- INTRODUCTION R av e Minnesota State Law requires all cities in the metro area to update their comprehensive plans by the end of 1998..City staff has started updating the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan as this law requires. However, the state law allows the Met Council to consider time extension requests from cities that need more time to finish their plan updates. DISCUSSION As I noted above, city staff has started preparing the proposed plan update. On November 2, 1998, the planning commission reviewed the draft of pages 1 -71 of the plan. They had several comments and changes for staff to make. On November 10, 1998 the HRA reviewed the proposed housing chapter. In addition to the changes noted by the commission, staff needs to complete the update of the parks and transportation chapters of the plan. Bruce Anderson told me that he expects the Parks Commission and their consultant to finish the parks plan update in April or May of 1999. We will then incorporate their work into the plan update. Once the city council adopts the new plan, we will send copies of the adopted plan to all the council members and to the commissioners. RECOMMENDATION Approve the resolution requesting a 6 -month time extension for completing the comprehensive plan update. kr /p:98memo -3. mem Attachment: Time Extension Resolution RESOLUTION RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN EXTENSION OF THE DECEMBER 31, 1998 DUE DATE FOR REVIEW OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY WITH AMENDED METROPOLITAN COUNCIL POLICY PLANS WHEREAS, state statutes (Minn. Stat. §473.175- 473.871) (1996) requires that cities review and revise their comprehensive plans for consistency with Metropolitan Council policy plans; and WHEREAS,_, the Metropolitan Council has amended its policy plans and has rovided system p y tem statements outlining Council policy relative to the city; and WHEREAS, Maplewood is required to review its comprehensive plan for consistent with y the amended policy plans and to prepare a revised comprehensive plan for submission to the Metropolitan Council by December 31, 1998; and WHEREAS, Maplewood has scheduled and budgeted to complete a major review and update of its comprehensive plan by June 30, 1999; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Maplewood requests that the Metropolitan Council grant Maplewood a six - month p p extension to the deadline to complete its comprehensive plan; circulate the revised document to the adjacent governmental units and affected school districts for review and comment; and following approvals by the plannin g commission and after consideration by the city council, submit the plan to the Metropolitan Council for review. The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by seconded b f" or , and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted for thereof: , and the following voted against the same: . WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified clerk of the City of Maplewood, Count of Ramsey, y State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing g g extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said city council held on the , with the i original thereof on file n WITNESS MY HAND officially as such (title) this _ (date) p:com_dvpt \compplan \1998ext.res Agenda item Czr S AGENDA REPORT Action by Ccunoll To City Manager Michael McGuire Endorsed,,...._ From Chief of Police Donald Winger fe _ Subject: Donation ]Rejected Date: November 13, 1998 Dat Introduction The Maplewood Police- Department D.A.R.E. Program has received a $3,750 donation from the North Saint Paul /Maplewood Rotary. Background For the past several years, the North Saint Paul /Mapl ewood Oakdale D.A.R. / E. Programs have sponsored a D.A.R.E. Bike -A -Thon in conjunction with the North rth Saint Paul /Maplewood Rotary. In this Bike -A -Thon, individuals led a money p g to children participating in the event, and the money earned is equally divided q y among the three cities involved, The Bike -A -Thon was held this past spring, and the amount raised for each city was $3,750. On November 13, 1998, a check was presented to our department at the North h Saint Paul /Maplewood Rotary meeting. Recommendation It is recommended that the Maplewood Police Department be allowed to p accept this donation and the money be designated for use b the Maplewood Police Y p olice D.A. R . E. Program. Action Requ i red Submit to the City Council for review and approval. DSW: j s AGENDA ITEM &9 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Administrative Assistant 41 SUBJECT: Close Projects 88 -13, 93 -02 and 95 -17 DATE: November 16, 1998 Action by Council: Endorse Modified,„ Re j ected .. ____ Date It is now appropriate to close Project 88 -13 (540) Upper Trout Brook Storm Sewer, Project 93 -02 (575) T. H. 61 Frontage Roads and Project 95 -17 (587) T.H. 61 North of Beam Watermain. Project 88 -13 has been abandoned and does not warrant public improvement . . p p ovement status at this time. The feasibility of improvements to Trout Brook will be considered next year. Projects 93 -02 and 95 -17 have been completed and final payments h the contractors. p p y have been made to RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Projects 88 -13, 93 -02 and 95 -17 be closed and that council authorize the finance director to make the appropriate adjustments to J close these funds. WJ P jt AGENDA ITEM &10 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Tax - Forfeit Property DATE: November 18, 1998 Action by Council: Endorse Modified., „.„ Re j ected Date Two properties have come to the city's attention that should be given consideration for acquisition as right -of -way. The first is at the northeast corner of Ripley Avenue and Frank Street. It is currently a vacant lot that is not maintained. It appears that some local drainage ponds are on this parcel. This parcel may be useful in designing a local public street improvement at some later date. The second parcel is at the southeast corner of County Road B and English Street. Like the previous property this is undeveloped and not maintained. It could p rove useful at a later date as a part of the street improvement project for the area. It is recommended the city council adopt the attached resolution authorizing staff to make application for convenience of these tax - forfeit parcels to the city for right -of -way purposes. KGH jt Attachment AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN TAX- FORFEITED PARCELS WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following-described tax- . g forfeited land is required for street right -of -way: PIN 10- 29- 22 -33- 0040 -2 PIN 16- 29- 22 -41- 0021 -8 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper City officials be and hereb are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land for street right -of -way purposes; and: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the office of the land commissioner. AGENDA ITEM &11 AGENDA REPORT Action by counail TO: City Manager Endorsed... FROM: Modified.._ ..._ City Engineer Rei ected al State Aid Street Designation Date SUBJECT: Munici Municipal t DATE: November M Recently the city council approved a resolution allowing Ramsey County to revoke the county state aid designation on County Road B from Edgerton Street to Arcade Street and Prosperity Road from Larpenteur Avenue to County Road B. These roads have been transferred to Maplewood's jurisdiction. Part of the agreement for the city taking jurisdiction of these roadways is the ability for Maplewood to designate them as municipal state aid routes. This allows the city o Y collect needs and spend municipal state aid funds on these roadways. The city council must pass a resolution establishing these roadways as municipal state aid streets. It is recommended the city council adopt the attached resolution establishing County Road B and Prosperity Road as municipal state aid streets. KGH jt Attachment RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID HIGHWAYS WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Maplewood that . Y the streets hereinafter described should be designated municipal .. g ed mun�cipaf state aid streets under the provisions of Minnesota law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED b • y the City Council of the City of Maplewood that the roads described as follows, to-wit: County Road B from Edgerton Street to Arcade Street Prosperity Road from Lar enteur Avenue enue to County Road B be, and hereby are established, located and • designated municipal state aid streets of said city, subject to the approval of the Commissioner Minnesota. ner of Transportation of the State of BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city cle ' y k is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this r • p resolution to the commissioner of transportation for consideration, and that upon a � • p approval of the designation of said roads or portions thereof, that same be constructed improved • . p and maintained as municipal state aid streets of the City of Maplewood to be nu • p numbered and known as municipal state aid streets. ADOPTED November 23, 1998 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a true and correct ' . y o copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the city ouncil of said city Y n November 23, 1998. (SEAL) City Clerk City of Maplewood A Item A Report Action by Council Endorse To. Cit Mana d,...... From: Colleen J. Dirkswager fo ie Subject,: MIS/GIS Temporar Position Rejected--....._ .,..... Date: November 3,, 1998 Date Introduction There has been si g rowth in computer technolo and access to shared mappin inform The Cit of Maplewood has access to this technolo however, are unable to to in to these resources due to a lack of consistent staff support and time. It is the intention of several cit departments to pool resources so the ma utilize this available technolo Discussion Communit Development, Public Works and MIS would Eke to pool resources to develop a temporar position for an individual to assist Maplewood in its g rowth in the information hi One of the areas which need additional attention is the Graphic Information S (GIS) which has been invaluable in producin detailed maps for staff reports. Another is the WEB site, which paves the wa for improved interaction between citizens and the Cit Both Communit Development Department and MIS have bud for interns. The interns have been able to provide Maplewood with the opportunit to dabble in these technolo arenas. However, the continued turnover has made it difficult to advance our s or provide consistent support to staff for mappin reports, etc. The possibilities of extensive interdepartmental applications of this technolo has bec evident. The ke is to establish and stabilize staff support. The need is for an individual to focus their attention on MIS, GIS and to create the data bases from which other applications will develop. The initial g oals for this position are as follows: I Web PA g e development and maintenance. Be as a resource which will be updated weekl potentiall evolvin into an interactive site. 2. Development and maintenance of cit GIS data-set and base map. a. Automation of permit process (software and applications) b. Conversion of databases into GIS s C. Development and maintenance of zonin and land use maps. These g oals will be evaluated annuall and new direction provided as our s advances. The ' estimated salar ran for an MIS/GIS technician would be $30,,000-$35,,000. P lus $91400 for benefits. The total funds re for this temporar position would be approximatel $44,403.00 annuall with cost of livin and performance increases as determined b performance. A Report .MIS/GIS Technician Pa 2 The funds to pa for this position will be provided b Mis,, Communit Development and Publi Works in the followin mann 1. MIS - annual intern bud $11,7+0.00 Communit Development - annual intern and licensin bud $14il000.00 3. Public Works - Sewer fund $181643.00 Total $44,403.00 Each y ear the involved department mana staff will meet • to re-evaluate- the osition an 10 determae contribution amounts b department. The specific contributions b departmen may vary durin the term of the position. The g oals for the position will chan and g row as the data bases and web pa are established and maintained. Various departments will be able to utilize information from these s as the g row and become available as resources. RECOMMENDATION Approve a 3 y ear temporar position for an MIS/G, IS technician. A item MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager Action by Council FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Endorse SUBJECT: Easement Vacation LOCATION: Saint John's Boulevard ea Modifie east of Hazelwood Street Rej e cte d.—' ke , DATE: November 9, 1998 �cte D .� INTRODUCTION Mr. Kyle Davis, representing HealthEast and Saint John's Hospital, is proposing to p p p g vacate an unused roadway and utility easement. This easement is the former Saint John's Boulevard east of Hazelwood Street. (See the maps on pages 4 and 5.) BACKGROUND On May 12, 1997, the city council approved the following for the Saint John's Hospital expansion: 1. A 25 -foot front setback variance for that part of the proposed parking deck that would be closer than 30 feet to the Hazelwood Street right -of -way. 2. A 10 -foot front setback variance for an open parking lot. The code requires 15 feet. This parking lot would be five feet from the Hazelwood Street . ri ht -of -wa g Y 3. A conditional use permit (CUP) revision for the hospital expansion. 4. Approval of site and building design plans. On July 15, 1997, the community design review board (CDRB) approved design revisions for the parking deck. (Please see the maps on pages 4 and 5.) DISCUSSION Maplewood has no plans to install any utilities or street in this easement. Saint John's Hospital moved their entrance roadway and utilities with the addition of the parking deck and building space to their site. Mr. Davis is requesting this vacation so that Saint John's may clean -up their property records. (See the site plan on page 5 and his statement starting on page 6.) COMMISSION ACTION On November 2, 1998, the planning commission recommended approval of the ro osed vacation. p p RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on pages 8 and 9. This resolution vacates the roadway and public utility easement known as Saint John's Boulevard (Document Number 2276523), east of Hazelwood Street. The city should vacate this easement because: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city and the adjacent property owners have no plans to build a street or utilities in this location. 3. "'The adjacent properties have access to public streets and utilities. REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Existing land use: Saint John's Hospital and parking facilities SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Saint John's Hospital parking lot East: Saint John's Hospital and Medical Office Building South: Saint John's Hospital parking deck West: Hazelwood Street p:sec3 /stjohns.vac Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Applicant's Statement 5. Vacation Resolution K Attachment 1 VADNAIS HEIGHTS Q C] COUNTY RD. o Q 4 U � o LL.I 3 4. W ,� 1 • . G 2• 1. SUMMIT CT. �J F � 2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR. 3. DULUTH CT. G�' 3. a;' 4. LYDIA AVE. p D ' BEAM , o 0 ........................................................... Z 0 ® AVE. COUNTY 11 R( p LYI)b c 6EAM w r o RADATZ Z 0 0Q 3 /1 0 ESSABI AV v W Markham Z Pond RAMSEY KohIman w t; I/ CO Lake UNTY .�� 2 COURT c C ca KOHL.MAN AVE. N v w KOHLMAN Z Hazelwood W o AVE. U Pork 0 COUNTY ROAD N C W m W 3 i 3 0 y/ Q TO (A El KoNman ,�� CT 0 0 t/1 .J fn� Z 0 O Z V Nk a W R Of 5 3 o C W m o (3 n EDGEHILL RD. N OR W DC C � o , c� w v AVE. c DEMONT AVE. 1 AVE. Q �• co -j U) O Est BROOKS AVE. BROOKS w 4 J N EL -� AVE. �E ' �' : o SEX TANT Z f A � 4 AVE. � t; secs ,& o �,' SEXTANT AVE. �Y 2 Pork Z 0� 0 P GERVAIS AVE. >- GERVAIS =W GERVAIS vg G RAN D VI EW AVE. Z CT. (Y 0� m VIKING DR T — SHERREN AVE x �- . V Kn c c'Te ad Lake CASTLE AVE. `� AVE. COPE AVE. Q _ co P COPE �J 0 Z i r i J LARK :5 CT' w v AVE D c LARK Q AVE. c c`n � � � ti v' �: � � (n Z LAURIE CO. a RD. v LAURIE R0. ZSherwoodo LAURIE o RD. �,,, 0 :2 V) cr- D RD. 0 p Q pa,* A. o -' V W o — = SAND URST AVE W w U Z 0 Q: N � Q >- ON AVE. �'' Z W Z Z JUNCTION Q Q B �, Y co. RD. e = 00 a Timber J e ar Pork °' E AVE. AVE. o ® BURKE AVE. ce"�' (1) CHAM6ER'S ST C �) o �� ELOR LOGE AVE. � �O^" �' LOCATION MAP 3 4 N ( 7 2) AC) 17 - 0) I 1p 33 (tIX. 47 7 ARL IL . 2f . �s i 13 $ 22 r is (.415 .64 ) i -0 co rs MI r te. ■ ■ *PS /.-. 4 Z . (3 1 Vil W" JI 0 a W ■ a.87 1. 00 62 Z3 00 O I�� %wo in 5 k; -fl. qj 1 • �• I r Q z D 0 ST. JOHN'S HOSPITAL 0 d;l w PROFESSIONAL . PAUL N 1r _ ,_ An to CLINIC BUILDING EYE SAI %A' 0 -4 N OPEP4 Bch" BEAM AVENUEn leme ' 0 0% a 41141 .4 0 15 4 a its PAUL 'w AOL E :Y CLI a �c L ill 4L 14. It -- 4 1% 1 0 t 4k OFFICE SHORES • BCm M PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP I PROPOSED VACATION r 1+ Attachment 3 1 e 7lT ILI T %* dr IL— A 40 =77- ot E-4 M3 WALM3 ***� typriL . ....... . —.- I VACV 919LA JOA IL IL ad 0 0 ..... . 0 . 1 0-00 , ----- 04 33 1--,' N N, 1101 A ld A -1 UX G� Ak so ju j l Scuffm"t CWAw► of SWYX4 of few an ft. I I AE`1 o f Sdc . r 29 , M 22 10 % COENTr A0d4d*r B E A M PROPOM PAR" 1 -11 I- Sig I �s i i � � i, plSM r Now"AL F% rape"wpt o w D= Aft 6 (E AiX 12) ---. 3 L so 0 so 90 2 AVENUE SITE PLAN .......... PROPOSED VACATION HEALTH EAST PARCI PARKING TABULATIC AREA RE• sT. NORTH LOT WEST LOT (UPPER DECK & SURFACE VEST LOT (LOWER LEVEL) SOUTH LOT 4 LEGEND: toomy SECTION EASO" PROPOSC Attachment 4 SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF PUBLIC VACATION APPLICATION THIS SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF PUBLIC i VACATION APPLICATION is made by Kyle Davis in his capacity as ' for HealthEast St. John's Hospital ( "Applicant "). 1. Applicant's Public Vacation Application is dated Or 1998, and is attached hereto. 2. Applicant's Public Vacation Application relates to Applicant's property located in the city of Maplewood (the "City "), Minnesota, and legally described as follows: See Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Hospital Campus "). 3. The only landowner of property that abuts the easement in question, other than Applicant, is Health Investors Business Trust, which owns the property legally described as follows: See Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "MOB Parcel "). 4. The easement that is the subj ect of the Public Vacation Application was created by Quit Claim Deed dated July 15, 1985, recorded August 1, 1985, in the office of the Ramsey County Recorder as Document No. 2276523 (the "Easement "). The Easement is a 60 -foot wide easement for roadway and public utility purposes originally intended to serve Applicant's hospital on the Hospital Campus. Subsequent to 1985, Applicant's hospital has been expanded and a medical office building is being 0 constructed on the MOB Parcel (the "Prof ects "). As a result of the Projects, the Easement is no longer used or necessary and has been replaced by the Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Restrictive Covenants dated August 20, 1998, recorded September 1, 1998, in the office of the Ramsey County Recorder as Document No. 3083195 (the "Declaration "). 5. As a result of the Projects and the Declaration, the Easement is no longer necessary or otherwise useful for any purpose. 6. Based on the above, Applicant respectfully requests that the City vacate the Easement legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. HEALTHEAST ST. JOHN'S HOSPITAL By: Kyle avis Its STP:579? 7 - 1.DOC/30645 -108 Attachment 5 EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Kyle Davis, representing HealthEast and Saint John's Hospital, applied for the vacation of the following- described easement: The 60- foot -wide roadway and public utility easement known as Saint John's Boulevard (as recorded as Document No. 2276523), lying east of Hazelwood Street in Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Maplewood, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On November 2, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the cit y council approve this vacation. 2. On November 23, 1998, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: The West 727.75 feet, as measured at right angles, of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota except that p t part thereof described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, being the center of said Section 3, said point being marked by a Ramsey County monument; thence along the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, North 00 degrees, 01 minute 40 seconds East, assumed basis of bearings, a distance of 703.29 feet; thence on a bearing of East 437.93 feet to the point of beginning, thence continuing on a bearing of East 264.24 feet; thence on a bearing of South 124.13 feet; thence on a bearing of West 264.24 feet; thence on a bearing of North 124.13 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to roads, and; All that part of the West 727.75 feet, as measured at right angles, of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, being the center of said Section 3, said point being marked by a Ramsey County monument; thence along the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, North 00 degrees, 01 minute 40 seconds East, assumed basis of bearings, a distance of 703.29 feet; thence on a bearing of East 437.93 feet to the point of beginning, thence continuing on a bearing of East 264.24 feet; thence on a bearing of South 124.13 feet; thence on a bearing of West 264.24 feet; thence on a bearing of North 124.13 feet to the point of beginning. 8 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city and the adjacent property owners have no plans to build a street or utilities in this location. 3. The adjacent properties have access to public streets and utilities. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1998. 9 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 2, 1998 VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Easement Vacation —Saint John's Boulevard, East of Hazelwood Street (Saint John's Hospital) p ) Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. There were no questions of the staff report from the commissioners. Kyle Davis, of HealthEast real estate services, affirmed Mr. Robert's comment that this was basically a "housecleaning type of thing" to clean up property records. Commissioner Rossbach said that until recently this was driveway but with the new expansion, the drives have been changed. Melinda Coleman, director of community development, said that if this request were denied the records would not be accurate for this parcel. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution which vacates the roadway and public utility easement known as Saint John's Boulevard (Document Number 2276523), east of Hazelwood Street. The city should vacate this easement because: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city and the adjacent property owners have no plans to build a street or utilities in this location. 3. The adjacent properties have access to public streets and utilities. Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. Agenda Item Action by Council MEMORANDUM Endorsed........ Modifie TO: City Manager Rejecte FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Date SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permits, Parking Waiver and Design Review'– g Bulk Storage Warehouse LOCATION: 1300 N. McKnight Road DATE: November 10, 1998 INTRODUCTION Project Description John C. Fallin, of FP &S, is proposing to build the following at his Bulk Storage warehouse 1300 N. McKnight Road: g ' 1. Phase 1 — A 121000- square -foot shipping -dock addition onto the east side of the Bulk Storage building. This addition would range in height from 16 feet on the north to 24 feet tall at its south side (the center of the east wall of the main building). The existing building is 76 feet tall. The proposed addition would g g p p d have an exterior of beige standing -seam siding, a white standing -seam metal roof and white trim. 2. Phase 2 - A 41320- square -foot, one -story office building between McKnight Road and Lakewood Drive. The applicant g would use half of the building for his firm and rent the remaining space. The proposed office would have an exterior of beige, horizontal-lap p vinyl siding, white trim, beige shingles and an earth -tone brick base. 3. Phase 3 — A 13,500- square -foot shipping -dock addition to adjoin the first (Phase 1 J ) addition and would be constructed of the same materials. Refer to the attached maps, plans and letter from the applicant on pages 13 -19. Requests The applicant is requesting that the city council approve the following: 1. A conditional use permit (CUP) for the Bulk Storage site because: a. The proposed shipping -dock addition (both phases) would be closer than 350 feet to the abutting residential districts. The proposed shipping -dock addition would be 120 feet from the residential district to the north and 195 feet from the residential district to the south. The code requires a CUP for buildings in a M -1 (light manufacturing) district that would be closer than 350 feet to a residential zone. b. Of the outdoor storage on the site. The city code requires a CUP for the outdoor storage g or display of goods or materials. Presently there are landscaping supplies stored west of the main building and roofing supplies stored at the east end of the site. A CUP has never been granted for outdoor storage. c. Of the expansion of a nonconforming use. Bulk Storage is nonconforming because it does not have any designated paved parking spaces. 2. A CUP for the proposed office building because it would be closer than 350 feet to the abutting residential districts. The proposed. office building would be 310 feet from the residential district to the north and 59 feet from the residential district to the south. 3. A parking waiver to have fewer parking spaces than the number required by code. For a building the size of Bulk Storage, including the proposed addition, the code requires 109 paved parking spaces (83 for the large building, 12 for the Phase 1 shipping -dock addition and 14 for the Phase 2 shipping -dock addition). 4 Approval of plans for the proposed building addition and office building. DISCUSSION CUP for the Bulk Storage Site — Proximity to Residential Districts Several neighbors responding to our survey said that they object to the proposed addition because it would increase noise, bring rodents into the area due to feed storage, increase traffic and decrease property values. Noise The proposed shipping -dock addition would lessen the noise of the current operation by enclosing the dock and shipping activities which are presently taking place outside. Mr. Fallin also said . that his business hours at the warehouse are from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. so there would not be any noise from his business in the late afternoon or evening. Some neighbors have said that train noise is bothersome. One neighbor provided a copy of the City of St. Paul's recently adopted ordinance which prohibits whistle soundings in St. Paul, except as a "warning of imminent and immediate danger to life or property." This resident suggested that the city council pass a similar ordinance. The concern about, or problems caused by, train whistles at night are not the fault of Bulk Storage. If the council wishes to address this issue, they should direct staff to investigate what options there are to control train whistle soundings. Rodents Several neighbors stated that they did not want this shipping -dock addition to be built because they felt the applicant would begin storing feed products that would attract rodents. Mr. Fallin said that his business primarily stores mineral ingredients for cattle and swine feed such as dicalcium phosphate. The product he stores is used to supplement feed with phosphorus, potasium, calcium and magnesium. He said that they have been storing these products on the site for the two years they have been at Bulk Storage. 2 Traffic The applicant does not anticipate that there will be a traffic increase because of the building addition. He explained that he is not proposing to add on because the business has grown or would grow because of the addition. He said the reason for this expansion is to provide an enclosed, controlled environment for his shipping and receiving operations. With or without the addition, if business increases the amount of truck traffic would increase, if business decreases, the amount of traffic will likewise decrease. According to Dan Solar, the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer, Lakewood Drive is carrying 12,500 vehicle trips per day (VDT). This is substantially under the amount of cars it is designed to handle. i=or, comparison, Mr. Solar said that McKnight Road, near the Sunray Shopping Center is handling 20,000 VTD and McKnight Road near Highway 36 is handling 15,000 VTD. According to Mr. Solar, the portion of McKnight Road by Bulk Storage can easily handle any slight traffic increase that this facility may generate. The Maplewood Comprehensive Plan, furthermore, designates Lakewood Drive as an arterial roadway. Arterials are intended to carry high amounts of traffic. They provide a major roadway connection between various parts of the city and abutting communities. Property Values Several neighbors are concerned that the proposed addition will decrease their property values. The proposed shipping -dock addition should improve compatibility rather than interfere with the nearby homes. Denying the proposed addition would cause the shipping activities to continue outdoors. The proposed addition is also small and insignificant compared to the square footage, mass and height of the existing building. The proposed Phase 1 dock addition would total 12,000 square feet in area. This is 15 percent of the size of the existing warehouse which totals 82,626 square feet. If the applicant builds the second phase of the shipping dock expansion, it would comprise an area of 30 percent of the existing building. The second phase, however, would be hidden from the homes to the north as would the first phase be hidden from the south. The addition would also be only 24 feet tall as opposed to the existing warehouse height of 76 feet. Outdoor Storage The code states that the city may require screening of outdoor storage yards. The outdoor storage at the east end of the Bulk Storage property is set back 300 feet from the nearest home site to the north and about 500 feet from the Pond View Apartments to the south /southeast. With the combination of the existing tree growth, as well as the substantial distance between the storage yard and dwellings, there is no reason to deny the continued use of this site for outdoor storage. The landscape - materials storage at the west end of the site is also well screened from the neighbors. Expansion of a Nonconforming Use -- Unpaved Parking Lot Bulk Storage is not a typical business with typical parking needs. The majority of the vehicular activity is truck transit that would not benefit from paved parking and drive areas. Nor would paved parking and drives enhance the appearance of the site. Six paved parking stalls amid acres of unpaved areas would provide no esthetic benefit (Mr. Fallin explained that he has six 3 employees). In terms of paving all of the drive areas, as would typically be required, it is better to leave the ground unpaved to absorb storm runoff instead of sheet- draining large areas into the wetlands. Staff does not see any need to require any paved parking since it would not benefit the site. The office building should have paved parking as proposed, however. CUP — Office Site The proposed office building is a permitted use in the M -1 district. It would not have a negative impact on abutting properties. The only concern expressed by a neighbor is that this site development not block drainage from his site. Parking Waiver The city council should approve this parking waiver. Requiring paving for 109 parking spaces and drives would be excessive for this site and detrimental to the surrounding wetlands. As stated above, staff does not feel that parking for the six employees on the site is warranted. Design Considerations Building Appearance and Placement Although it is a different material from the existing plywood- exterior Bulk Storage building, the proposed addition would be appropriate for this site. The applicant should repair the main building as needed, however, and remove the graffiti from the south elevation. Landscaping The applicant has not proposed any additional landscaping for Bulk Storage. The proposed addition would be screened from the homes to the north by a thick stand of mature oak trees. This natural screening satisfies the screening requirement for this site. The applicant proposes to leave most of the natural vegetation on the office site, but would landscape the frontage along McKnight Road. Mr. Fallin has not specified the types of plantings, however. The applicant should provide a planting list before getting a building permit. Watermain Easement Crossing The parking lot for the proposed office building crosses a St. Paul Water Utility watermain easement. Tom Johnson, with the water utility, said that this may be allowed but he must see a detailed grading plan first to determine that it is feasible and would not impact the buried watermain. Staff must have a detailed grading and drainage plan, as well, before we can issue a permit for this site. 0 Police Concerns Officer Dale Razskazoff, of the Maplewood Police Department, gave me the following report: In the past 365 days, this address has had nine alarm calls, two burglaries, three criminal damage to property reports, three thefts, two traffic arrests and two disturbing the peace calls. Due to its geographical location and its almost hidden features to the main stream traffic, this property is an attractive hazard for the type of police calls it gets and is used in the darkened hours for several types of unwanted vehicle traffic. The property also stretches along the railroad tracks east for about two blocks. Outside storage also takes place here. The property adjoins an apartment complex which is fenced. This fence is violated often by youth in the area and is used for anything from making forts to underage drinking parties. Officer Razskazoff suggested: 1. The new addition, as well as the old, needs to have an updated alarm system. 2. The facility needs to be extremely well lit around its entire campus and the eastern portion of its buildingless property. 3. Needs to have a controlled access or locked gate system to enter the property from McKnight Road. Staff supports these suggestions, however, extensive lighting of the site will surely cause complaints from neighbors. From the comments I received, the residents in the new neighborhoods to the north and south prefer to have this facility less noticeable rather than have it made more obvious and noticeable. Although I do not disagree with the need, lighting the site would make it more obvious to neighbors at night. If the city council wishes to require full site lighting, they should make it a condition of the CUP. COMMITTEE ACTIONS November 2,1998: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUPs and parking waiver. November 9, 1998: The community design review board recommended approval of the design plans. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on pages 22 -24 approving a conditional use permit for the warehouse facility at 1300 N. McKnight Road. This permit allows the expansion of a building in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district closer than 350 feet to a residential district, outdoor storage and the expansion of a nonconforming use due to the lack of designated paved parking areas. This approval is based on the findings required by code as well as the following reasons: 1. The proposed warehouse addition is substantially screened from neighboring single dwellings. 2. The applicant is storing mineral feed additives, not food -type feed products. 5 3. The applicant's business hours are from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. so there would not be evening noise generated from his business. 4. The proposed shipping -dock addition would benefit the site by containing shipping activities that are presently taking place outdoors. 5. Lakewood Drive is an arterial roadway designed to handle traffic volumes that would exceed the current usage and any increase anticipated by the proposed addition. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. A designated paved parking area shall not be required unless the site usage changes warranting the need for parking spaces. 5. Update the alarm system at the facility, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Safety. 6. Provide a locked gate system at the Lakewood Drive entrance, subject to the approval of the Police Chief. 7. Provide several signs along the wetland edge on the warehouse site. The number and placement of these signs shall be determined by staff. These signs shall prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping in or around the wetland. B. Adopt the resolution on pages 25--26 approving a conditional use permit for an office building between McKnight Road and Lakewood Drive in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district that would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district. This approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. C. Approve a parking waiver for the Bulk Storage facility at 1300 N. McKnight Road allowing fewer parking spaces than the number required by code. The code requires 109 for the Bulk Storage warehouse building (after the proposed shipping -dock addition), none are required. This waiver is based on the following reasons: Ef 1. Bulk Storage is not a typical business with typical parking needs. The majority of the vehicular activity is truck transit that would not benefit from paved parking and drive areas. 2. Paved parking and drives would not enhance the appearance of the site. Six paved parking stalls (there are six employees at the warehouse facility) amid acres of unpaved space would provide no esthetic benefit 3. It is better to leave the ground unpaved to absorb storm runoff instead of sheet- draining large areas into the wetlands. The city council may require the owner /operator to add paved parking and driveways if the city council determines the use of the site and building has changed to warrant paving. D. Approve the plans date - stamped October 7 and October 21, 1998 for the addition to the Bulk Storage building at 1300 N. McKnight Road and the proposed office building west of Bulk Storage between McKnight Road and Lakewood Drive. The property owner shall: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Provide the following before getting a building permit for the proposed office building: a. A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval. The erosion control plan shall comply with ordinance requirements. The grading and drainage plan shall show the wetland delineation line to verify compliance with setback requirements. b. A revised landscape plan for staff approval indicating the sizes and types of plantings proposed for the office site frontage. c. Revised building elevations, for review and approval by the community design review board, if the applicant proposes to change the building design. 3. Complete the following before occupying the office building: a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. b. Install handicap- parking signs for the handicap - parking space. c. Screen roof- mounted equipment, if used, that would be visible from residential property. d. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure if there will be any outdoor storage of refuse. The enclosures must match the building in color and materials. There must be a closeable gate that is 100% opaque. e. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas. f. Repair and repaint the existing warehouse building and remove graffiti. 4. If any required work is not done on the office or office site when the applicant requests a W a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. 5. Provide several signs along the wetland edge on the warehouse site. The number and placement of these signs shall be determined by staff. These signs shall prohibit any -building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping in or around the wetland. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. no CITIZENS' COMMENTS I surveyed owners of the 21 properties within 350 feet of both sites. Of the 14 replies, four were in favor and ten objected. (One of the residents on the our mailing list circulated Staff's questionnaire to other neighbors as well.) In Favor 1. 1 am in favor because of the noise deadening factor from, from railroad, also maybe they could paint existing building also. (Remackel and Glazier, 1298 Myrtle Street) 2. It will improve the look of the building and its roof. Plant more trees to hide building from street such as evergreens, ash. (Heathcote, 2341 Tilsen Avenue) 3. I'm sure with new owners and owner occupied, things will be done in business -like manner. (Berglund and Shortridge) 4. It will help a local business. (Funk, 1272 Myrtle Street) Opposed 1. The addition will decrease our property value and will cause an increase in traffic. (Gruba, 1397 Myrtle Street) 2. The addition and office will cause too much additional traffic, storage of feed products will attract rodents and noise will increase. (Morris, 1282 Myrtle Street) 3. Refer to the letter on page 20 from Randy Batterson (2321 Tilsen Avenue). Mr. Batterson also forwarded copies of this letter to his neighbors for their signatures. Another resident who signed a copy of this letter is Marcia and Kart Kohn (1369 Myrtle Street). The concerns listed in this letter are about traffic increase, rodents due to feed storage, noise and decreased property values. 4. Refer to the letter on page 21. (Bruechert, 1380 Currie Street). 5. I object only if it interferes with the water drainage from my property. This is a drain that has been here for many years. Without it we would be flooded out. This is also a drain for 1250 McKnight Road which adjoins our property. (Potter, 1262 McKnight Road). - 6. This will increase rats, mice. I have children that have severe asthma. I do not avant combustion that can ignite from a train. This is not the way to make people understand. You should call a meeting to let us all ask questions before anything is done. As for the new roof, our value just went down all you can see is this brown roof. My concern is what impact will this have with more traffic, noise and road safety. Will this increase property taxes? I am also concerned about noise levels at night. Will this effect wildlife? We say no to this. (Bock, 2342 Tilsen Avenue) 9 7. E object because of the noise level and increased amount of truck traffic. (DeGraw, 2322 Tiisen Avenue) 8. I object to the extra traffic and the possibility of rodent. No feed storage. (Larson, 1295 Myrtle Street) 9. I object because of additional tracking activity and noise and the increase in rodents which will decrease property value. (Denault, 1389 Currie Street) Miscellaneous Comment One neighbor to the north on Arlington Street stopped in and said that the train whistles are too frequent and loud. 10 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Property size: 34 acres Existing land use: Bulk Storage Warehouse facility as well as open storage for a landscaping business storing retaining wall materials and cement pavers west of the building and roofing supplies on the east end of the site. SURROUNDING LAND USES Bulk Storage Site North: Railroad tracks and single dwellings South: Single dwellings West: Lakewood Drive and the applicants proposed office building site East: Additional Bulk Storage property Proposed Office Site North: Railroad tracks and Lakewood Drive South: Single dwellings (the abutting lot is a trucking yard) West: Single dwellings in the City of St. Paul and railroad property East: Lakewood Drive and Bulk Storage property PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: M -1 Zoning: M -1 Ordinance Requirements Section 36- 187(b) states that no building or exterior use, except parking, may be erected, altered or constructed within 350 feet of a residential district without a CUP. Section 36- 151(b)(4) requires a CUP for the outdoor storage or display of goods or materials. The city may require screening of such uses provided at least 80 percent of materials are screened. Section 36- 22(a)(8) requires one parking space for every 1000 square feet of warehouse space. Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council must base approval of a CUP on nine standards for approval. Refer to findings one through nine in the resolution on pages 25 -26. 11 Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonabl interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the` surrounding neighborhood and -is not detrimental to the :harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. p: sec24 -29 \bu l kstor.2 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan— Entire Property 4. Site Plan —Office Site 5. Building Elevations — Shipping -Dock Addition 6. Building Elevations — Office Building 7. Applicant's Statement 8. Letter from Randy Batterson 9. Letter from Dave Bruechert 10. CUP Resolution —Bulk Storage Site 11. CUP Resolution —Office Building 12. Plans date - stamped October 7 and October 21, 1998 (separate attachments) 12 Attachment 1 VVL! COURSE J� 2. W Q N o v� a Awk 0 3. d z x v � & W o KNOLL CIR. RIPLEY AVE. �� RI PLEY AV 39 KINGSTON AVE, KINGSTON J D AVE. W N PRICE AVE. c W F- L W CD Y MCKNK:NT LN N _ LARPENTEUR AVE. LAJ • � IDAHO AVE. � O � HOYT AVE. MONT AVE. IrIONTi�tiA ow CT. U 4" NEBRASKA AUJ NJ meow L P" � � V �• O�AxH�u CT rT ANGELA CT Proklo v S d 7 LN G• �. A VE. L N N 1 COYOTE I ANMOPE WAY Z ::I qq AVE. BtS Ci 3E1 B RA LF D Z W 4 BOBCAT LN o u� 1 V I 3 4 5 5 COUGER LN HAWTIiORNE AVE E. MARYLAND AVE. • E. ROSE vM c cn AVE. GERM` o 4GERAM& MAGNOLIA AVE. A • Y beaver L ke ®��' �� W S'�� PL. 11, Z VI KAXE STER AVE CASE AVE � � W � z P � �p o C L LN. BRAND AVE. AVE. 0 7th ST. 7th ST. z comer Buses T AVE. MINNEHAHA AVE. LOCATION MAP 13 4 N Attachment 2 • PUD TOW- 00 pl • SAM ....... PU PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 14 i N Attachment 3 PHASE I. SHIPPING DOCK ADDITION II — PHASE II. PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING BETWEEN McKNIGHT ROAD AND LAKEWOOD DRIVE II j I � 9 31 aG �o J M � z / ,r i \I EXISTING BULK STORAGE BUILDING r r SITE PLAN APPLICANT'S ENTIRE PROPERTY PHASE III. SECOND SHIPPING DOCK ADDITION / 6 n ic Co / / /gyp • �' +�% / i+ 4 N 11; Attachment 4 \ r \ O -• _ l ipo r � .+ . ♦ ` • 1 400 r ow ow SITE PLAN PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING li N 16 Attachment 5 ol or .\ + r s EAST 15-LEVe `• PHASE 1 JVI�� 1�0�"� YY At1.S I �ZC� • MJ �iC1� Ile ~' i TF, EAST ELEV-* PHASE 3 . V � ORTH ELEV-0 (SOUT REVERSE) . • META L RCAF . Wi4ft - BUILDING ELEVATIONS PROPOSED SHIPPING DOCK ADDITIONS 17 Attachment 6 1 � -..—Won NORTH ELEV (SOUTH REVERSED) i Go*— 15H Az:i_r-5 .WEST ELEV, (EAST- REVERSED) BUILDING ELEVATIONS PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING Attachment 7 STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE FOR APPROVAL OF REQUEST Feed Products &Service Company (FP &S) has recently purchased the assets of Bulk Storage Corporation at 1300 McKnight Road North. Previously FP &S had been a tenant for two years. The intended use of the property has been for bulk storage and distribution of agricultural ingredients. FP &S warehouses and distributes feed ingredients for livestock and pets. We are applying to the City of Maplewood for a conditional use permit for our M -1 zoned property due to residences within 350 feet. FP &S is and will operate the property in a manner, which is consistent with the intended use of the property. Immediately we will improve the badly deteriorated roof with a shingle color evaluated by the city. We would like the conditional use permit so we may phase build two Yp extension to the existing warehouse (Phase I & Phase III) that will contain our shipping dock. We also are filing to build an office (Phase II) on the 5-acre parcel across Lakewood road. Each of these improvements will add beneficial aesthetics to the planned character of the surrounding area. The extension on warehouse will improve our eastern exposure and reduce the amount of noise and clutter. We are planning to build a professional wide span structural system that that will have a 20 -year warranty. The Butlerib II Wall System will be 26 -gauge aluminum -zinc coated steel. This steel building will be over 90 percent screened by the surrounding landscape and will enclose the exposed shipping dock. Patrick Conrad with the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District has evaluated our Phase I , Phase III plan and given us an "Okay ". Phase II (Office) will not impact any wetlands. Our office building plan is for a 4,400 square foot building. We will nestle the building into the 5 -acre lot on the far east side of the property next to Old Mcknight road. The trees on the south side here will completely screen our site to the adjacent residence on the south side. St. Paul is to the west and the only residence that is visible from the property line is on the very southwest corner. Our office will be a light traffic office for five employees and occasional visitors. We may rent to one other business that will be consistent with our light traffic status. Our building improvements are for the improved use of what the property has done for the last 30 years. By our acquisition the property will now begin to improve and add to the economic development of the area rather than the continued decay which has been the case in the last 5 years. In order to work with the city, we are willing to provide the city an easement to our wet lands. It is extremely crucial to our business that we begin construction of the warehouse immediately so that we may pour concrete before the winter freeze. Phase II (Office) will be planned for completion in the winter of 1999. Our Phase III (Final Warehouse Addition) may not be necessary and has not been given a start date. 1998 U U 19 - - --^__ _ -__ _ _ __ ____ Attachment 8 Office of Community Development City Of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN. 55109 Thomas Ekstrand — Associate Planner 770-4563 Mr. Ekstrand, October 12, 1998 D OCT 131998 D I am writing to you in regards to your Neighborhood Survey regarding a conditional use permit for the expansion of the Bulk Storage Warehouse and office site. I object to this proposal for several reasons: a.) Expansion of the existing facility will only add to the already heavy traffic on Lakewood Drive, additionally the access road to the facility has limited visibility, a slow moving truck entering or departing the access road will create potental danger. b.) FP &P plans to warehouse feed ingredients to live stock and pets, this creates the potential of attracting rodents to the nearby residents. c.) As a result of expansion there will be additional trucking activity and noise, this area already has excessive road noise, trains switching cars at all hours, sounding horn at cross streets, etc. I have personally called at least three times as a result of excessive noise. Although there is a local noise ordinance, the railroad is not in compliance or the Bulk Storage Company. d.) Decreased value of property: We purchased our home three years ago, at the time one of the concerns I had was what was being stored in the Bulk Facility, If there would have been food product at the time I would have not purchased the home for fear of rodents. This would be a concern to any prospective buyer, which will ultimately decrease the value of our home. Questions: a.) What legal rights do we have as residents to prevent the conditional use permit from being approved? b.) Other than generating additional tax dollars to the city of Maplewood, how will this expansion add value to the residents? ' c.) Will a neighborhood (24 surveyed) individuals petition prevent the permit from being issued? Please let me know what the residents can do to prevent to prevent the permit from being approved. , ga �- Rand rBatterson 2321 Tilsen Aveuue Maplewood, MN. 55119 Home - 770 -9022 Office- 828 -2217 20 Attachment 9 1380 Currie Street Maplewood, MN 55119 October 15, 1998 In reply to: Neighborhood Survey - Bulk Storage Warehouse Thomas Ekstrand - Associate Planner Office of Community Development 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Ekstrand: am writing to you in regards to the Neighborhood Survey regarding a conditional use permit for the expansion of the Bulk Storage Warehouse and office site: I strongly oppose this proposal for several reasons. Noise — The level of noise generated from the area encompassing the current Bulk Storage facility is already excessive. Expansion of the facility will only generate more noise. About one year ago I personally started a petition drive to reduce the noise level coming from the facility and train traffic. had approximately 25 signatures but never went any further then that. I plan on the future to pursue the excessive noise level with the Maplewood Police Department because I am quite sure that the train traffic and bulk storage facility are violating local noise ordinances. Traffic - Expanding said facility will undoubtedly increase heavy truck traffic in the area. The residential section immediately to the north of the facility has a number of small children, I personally have 2 children under the age of 3 with a 3" child expected to arrive in 2 months. I feel that increased traffic represents an increased concern for the safety to my family. Property Value — I built my house 3 years ago and was extremely happy with the location and Maplewood itself but feel that expansion of this light industrial area will lower my property value. Sincerely, &4'j- lei Dave Br uechert Enclosure (1) 21 Attachment 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. John C. Fallin, of FP &S Company, applied for a conditional use permit for the expansion of a building in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district closer than 350 feet to a residential district, for outdoor storage and for the expansion of a nonconforming use due to the lack of designated paved parking areas. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1300 N. McKnight Road. The legal description is: ALL THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22,` RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA THAT LIES SOUTHERLY OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 95 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS, AND OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY, AS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; ALSO THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24, BOUNDED AS FOLLOWS: ON THE NORTH BY A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 95 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY, AS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; ON THE WEST BY THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 66 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; ON THE SOUTH BY A STRAIGHT LINE DRAWN FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24 TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 24 WHICH IS DISTANT 450 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY, SAID SOUTHERLY LINE BEING A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 56 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY AS ORIGINALLY LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; AND ON THE EAST BY THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THAT LIES NORTHWESTERLY OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 8.5 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE MOST SOUTHERLY SIDE TRACK I.C.C. NO. 114 OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY, AS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED, ALL IN THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY, STATE OF MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On November 2, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on . City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 22 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 10. The proposed warehouse addition is substantially screened from neighboring single dwellings. 11. The applicant is storing mineral feed additives, not food -type feed products. 12. The applicant's business hours are from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. so there would not be evening noise generated from his business. 13. The proposed shipping -dock addition would benefit the site by containing shipping activities that are presently taking place outdoors. 14. Lakewood Drive is an arterial roadway designed to handle traffic volumes that would exceed the current usage and any increase anticipated by the proposed addition. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 23 4. A designated paved parking area shall not be required unless the site usage changes in some fashion warranting the need for such parking spaces. 5. Update the alarm system at the facility, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Safety. 6. Provide a locked gate system at the Lakewood Drive entrance, subject to the approval of the Police Chief. 7. Provide several signs along the wetland edge on the warehouse site. The number and placement of these signs shall be determined by staff. These signs shall prohibit an g p Y building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping in or around the wetland. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1998. 24 Attachment 11 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. John C. Fallin, of FP &S Company, applied for a conditional use ermit to build an office building n an M -1 (light m p g manufacturing) district closer than 350 feet to a residential district. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property between McKnight Road and Lakewood Drive west of 1300 N. McKnight Road. The legal description is: ALL THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22;-RAMSEY COUNTY, = MINNESOTA THAT LIES SOUTHERLY OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 95 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS, AND OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY, AS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; ALSO THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24, BOUNDED AS FOLLOWS: ON THE NORTH BY A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 95 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY, AS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; ON THE WEST BY THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 66 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; ON THE SOUTH BY A STRAIGHT LINE DRAWN FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST UART Q ER OF SAID SECTION 24 TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 24 WHICH IS DISTANT 450 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY, SAID SOUTHERLY LINE BEING A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 56 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY AS ORIGINALLY LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; AND ON THE EAST BY THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24• EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART THAT LIES NORTHWESTERLY OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 8.5 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE MOST SOUTHERLY SIDE TRACK I.C.C. NO. 114 OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY, AS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED, ALL IN THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY, STATE OF MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On November 2, 1998, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on . City staff p ublished a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required b law. q Y The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 25 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. - The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1998. 26 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 2, 1998 VI. NEW BUSINESS B. Bulk Storage Warehouse (1300 McKnight Road North): Conditional Use Permit for Warehouse Expansion and Outdoor Storage, Conditional Use Permit for New Office Building and Parking Reduction Authorization Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Rossbach asked whether the strip of mature oak trees to the north could be developed in the future since it is now being used as a screen. Mr. Roberts said a portion of the land is owned by the city and will be used as a city park. He said the mature trees are located behind the recently -built homes and removal would probably be at the discretion of the homeowners. Commissioner Pearson noted that it looked like the far east end of the property was being "leveled out almost on top of the Jim's Prairie" and almost to the water's edge of the wetland. Mr. Pearson questioned the setback requirement for this zoning. Mr. Roberts thought this might be a Class 4 wetland that required a 20 -foot buffer zone. He said he was not sure how or when the grading happened. Commissioner Thompson said that there was a gateway from this area to Jim's Prairie but no mention of access. Mr. Roberts thought the gate might be to railroad property. He said it was likely that the nature center personnel have access rights through the railroad property off to the north. Mr. Roberts felt that access to the nature center property was not a reasonable condition to place on this applicant. Mr. Thompson was also concerned if the drainage would be adequate. Mr. Roberts said staff was requiring a grading and drainage plan as part of the community design review board conditions. Commissioner Thompson felt verbiage should be incorporated to impose business hour restrictions on the tenants. He said the staff recommendations only addressed half of the issues. He clarified that he was worried about the hours of operation of the large warehouse site. Mr. Roberts pointed out that the staff recommendations were not making hours of operation a specific condition. Commissioner Pearson asked about a future use or tenant being allowed to increase the use of storage in the bulk plant area. Mr. Roberts said he didn't know of anything that would prevent it, but any major changes to the storage area would require revision of the conditional use permit. Commissioner Trippler asked if the city had the authority to require a locked gate. Mr. Roberts said the city council could require this if they felt it was necessary for the safety and welfare of the public. Commissioner Trippler wondered if the commission was being asked to approve Phase 1 with the possibility of Phase II and III in the future. Mr. Roberts said Recommendation A covered the project east of Lakewood Drive, the outdoor storage building and warehouse expansion; Recommendation B is for the new office building west of Lakewood Drive; and Recommendation C is the parking waiver for the warehouse complex. He said a typical review is for one year and the community design review board review is for two years (if they have not been issued a building permit by the city). Chairperson Fischer noted that the resolution says approval is subject to construction being substantially started within one year of council approval. Ken Roberts said the wetlands have already been delineated and the watershed district has approved it. He said, when the detailed drainage and grading plans are done, the wetland needs Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 11 -02 -98 to be incorporated into it and the effect of the drainage on the wetland should be shown. Mr. Roberts said signs showing the wetlands are not required. Commissioner Rossbach was concerned about the grading that has been going on and the potential for tenants to think it was easier to "throw something into the swamp than do the right thing." He felt it would be appropriate to have the wetland marked. There was a question about the fence near the apartment complex. Mr. Roberts said the fence did not belong to Bulk Storage. He didn't know if the fence was actually physically destroyed or if people were just climbing over it. Chairperson Fischer felt that if the fence belonged to the nature center, staff could be asked to check the condition of it. She also said if the fence belonged to the apartment building and was a requirement of a planned unit development, they could be required to repair the fence. Commissioner Pearson thought the locked gate would cause the police more problem than help because many of the trespassers come under the bridge from the area west of McKnight and north of Ivy. Commissioner Thompson thought the gate would discourage the area from being used as a "lovers' lane." Jack Ovick, the architect for the applicant, was present at the meeting. Commissioner Pearson inquired about the planned use for the leveled area to the east. Mr. Ovick showed photographs and said it appeared that old pallets were stacked at this location. Mr. Roberts thought it looked like some of the roofing material for the new roof which should be completed soon. Commissioner Thompson said, when he visited the site, the roofing company had hauled out a large quantity of trash and their lease was being terminated. He said there was very little material left. Commissioner Trippler commented that some of the materials stored in the warehouse tend to be dusty. He asked what measures are being taken to ensure that fugitive dust will not be coming from the facility. Mr. Ovick said that part of the reason for the addition to the building was to have an area where shipping could be controlled better than just opening the doors when the bagging process was occurring. With the new addition, when products are ready for shipping they will be palletized or conveyor -fed into the truck and then covered with tarp. Mr. Ovick also said that the only thing on -site that would attract rodents are packaged grain products. A private rodent - control company regularly visits the site to control this problem. Commissioner Rossbach asked if there was a consensus on the commission regarding the gate. Mr. Ovick said John Fallin of FP &S thought it was a good idea to put the gate in to restrict unauthorized people /vehicles from entering and causing damage. They also are considering adding additional lighting for increased security. At this time there is no plan to change drainage. He said a civil engineer will be hired to comply with the city's drainage requirements. Commissioner Rossbach said he wanted something about wetland signage included in the motion and asked for input. Commissioner Pearson asked to have language added that there would not be storage on the property of products which were not directly a part of this company's product or operation. He did say that Bulk Storage had been "a good neighbor." Mr. Roberts thought part of this business is storing materials for other people. He said staff was not trying to limit what was stored or who it was stored for. They just wanted to meet the general conditions of not creating a hazard. Commissioner Pearson stated he was not opposed to this company in regard to its present situation and operation, but he was concerned about storage without a permit and leveling of land too close to established wetland. Commissioner Rossbach felt the city had controls for hazardous substances through ordinances. He said it seemed unfair to single out this company because their property is substantially hidden by trees, etc. Commissioner Pearson said he did not want to penalize them but he would like a Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 11 -02 -98 better understanding of what they intend to do with the area. Commissioner Rossbach asked if the city environmental health official could check the site yearly. Commissioner Pearson didn't think that was the answer. He said he could live with the proposal but he was concerned. He thought the proposal was for one specific type of agricultural - related use but it sounded like the intent was to do more than that. Commissioner Trippler said it seemed inconsistent for Commissioner Pearson to say that Bulk Storage had been a good neighbor and then to be concerned about what they intended to store. He was troubled because he thought restricting this storage would go way beyond the control that the city should have over how someone runs his business. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for the warehouse facility at 1300 N. McKnight Road. This permit allows the expansion of a building in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district closer than 350 feet to a residential district, outdoor storage and the expansion of a nonconforming use due to the lack of designated paved parking areas. This approval is based on the findings required by code as well as the following reasons: 1. The proposed warehouse addition is substantially screened from neighboring single dwellings. 2. The applicant is storing mineral feed additives, not food -type feed products. 3. The applicant's business hours are from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. so there would not be evening noise generated from his business. 4. The proposed shipping -dock addition would benefit the site by containing shipping activities that are presently taking place outdoors. 5. Lakewood Drive is an arterial roadway designed to handle traffic volumes that would exceed the current usage and any increase anticipated by the proposed addition. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. A designated paved parking area shall not be required unless the site usage changes warranting the need for parking spaces. 5. Update the alarm system at the facility, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Safety. 6. Provide a locked gate system at the Lakewood Drive entrance, subject to the approval of the Police Chief. 7. Provide wetland signage as required by city ordinance. Planning Commission -4- Minutes of 11 -02 -98 B. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for an office building between McKnight Road and Lakewood Drive in an M -1 (light manufacturing) district that would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district. This approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. C. Approval of a parking waiver for the Bulk Storage facility at 1300 N. McKnight Road allowing fewer parking spaces than the number required by code. The code requires 109 for the Bulk Storage warehouse building (after the proposed shipping -dock addition), none are required. This waiver is based on the following reasons: 1. Bulk Storage is not a typical business with typical parking needs. The majority of the vehicular activity is truck transit that would not benefit from paved parking and drive areas. 2. Paved parking and drives would not enhance the appearance of the site. Six paved - parking stalls (there are six employees at the warehouse facility) amid acres of unpaved space would provide no esthetic benefit 3. It is better to leave the ground unpaved to absorb storm runoff instead of sheet - draining large areas into the wetlands. The city council may require the owner /operator to add paved parking and driveways if the city council determines the use of the site and building has changed to warrant paving. Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes all The motion passed. Chairperson Fischer inquired if community design review board approval was needed for the new roof on this building. Mr. Roberts and Ms. Coleman said the applicant brought in color samples for the reroof and staff did make suggestions. Ms. Fischer said she wondered sometimes "if staff gives due consideration to the impact color can have on a neighborhood when you have vast surfaces." MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 9, 1998 VI. DESIGN REVIEW A. Building Addition and Office Building Proposals, 1300 McKnight Road North —Feed Products and Service Company Jack Ovick, an architect for FP &S, said they would like to start work immediately on the shipping area. He said that, with the shipping addition, trucks will be able to load in a manner `-,. that will minimize dust pollutants. The building would be sealed and only open to the plant where they mix the products and load them. Mr. Ovick thought they had preliminary approval of the grading plan. He said there was nothing planned for landscape in the area at this time, but a landscape firm would be hired if additional plantings were required. Vice Chairperson Robinson asked for clarification on the reference to the wetland delineation line. Mr. Ovick said there were probably two sets of wetlands at this site. The water drains through a shallow area south of the driveway where the roofing materials are now stored. He said they need to determine whether a pipe is needed or some sort of holding area to discharge the water to the wetland. Mr. Ovick said the other wetland is near the proposed office addition near McKnight Road. He said there is a culvert that passes under the overpass and the ditches drain through this to the west. Mr. Ovick said they would install a culvert near this wetland area and access from the parking lot to the building would be across a little bridge and planted area. As far as plans for landscaping the office area, he said they are trying to leave it as natural as possible. Secretary Tom Ekstrand said from a staff perspective they liked this project. He said the shipping dock addition would enclose a lot of activity and make it a better facility. It should be "quieter and better for the neighborhood." Mr. Ovick said the concept was to make the building look more like a residence than a commercial, flat -top building. There would be masonry around the base, siding up to the eave, an overhang and angled roof with shingles. It would probably be a beige -gray. John Fallin, of FP &S, said a veneer -type of brick would go up half the office building with a metal roof. He said he would like to upgrade the office and make it out of logs. He showed some samples of the brick veneer material. Mr. Fallin said he would prefer a log building because of the type business they are in. He thought it would look better on the lot. He also said the entrance would be a cathedral style. Mr. Ekstrand suggested that, when plans are drawn, they be submitted to the community design review board for review. He didn't know how the board could approve the concept at this time without seeing any plans. Boardmember Ledvina thought the building, as proposed, would be improved by the addition of gables. He had some problems with the building plan as submitted. Mr. Fallin said they would like to upgrade from what is proposed. Secretary Ekstrand recommended amending his staff recommendation to add a condition submitting the building design for board approval. Mr. Ovick said they primarily want to begin Phase 1 (shipping dock) now and then build the office building a year from now. Secretary Ekstrand said approval of the shipping dock would not be held up. He said another option would be to approve the office building, if the board was satisfied with the design, and the applicant would have the option to submit a different plan for approval at a later date. Vice Chairperson Erickson advised the applicant to consider Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes of 11 -09 -98 the timing element needed for city approval of revised plans before ordering materials. Secretary Ekstrand said he viewed Phases 1 and 3 as "sort of an entire package." He saw no problems with approval of these additions. He said there was a need for more detail on landscaping, grading, drainage and design for the proposed office site. Mr. Ekstrand said both the review board and the city council will need to review a revised office plan. Various options were considered for the necessary approvals. Boardmember Ledvina moved the Community Design Review Board recommend: D. Approval of the plans date- stamped October 7 and October 21, 1998 for the addition to the Bulk Storage building at 1300 N. McKnight Road and the proposed office building west of Bulk Storage between McKnight Road and Lakewood Drive. The property owner shall: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Provide the following before getting a building permit for the proposed office building: a. A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval. The erosion control plan shall comply with ordinance requirements. The grading and drainage plan shall show the wetland delineation line to verify compliance with setback requirements. b. A revised landscape plan for staff approval indicating the sizes and types of plantings proposed for the office site frontage. c. Revised building elevations, for review and approval by the community design review board, if the applicant proposes to change the building design. 3. Complete the following before occupying the office building: a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. b. Install handicap - parking signs for the handicap- parking space. c. Screen roof - mounted equipment, if used, that would be visible from residential property. d. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure if there will be any outdoor storage of refuse. The enclosures must match the building in color and materials. There must be a closeable gate that is 100% opaque. e. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas. f. Repair and repaint the existing warehouse building and remove graffiti. 4. If any required work is not done on the office or office site when the applicant requests a certificate of occupancy, the city may allow temporary occupancy if : a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. Community Design Review Board -3- Minutes of 11 -09 -98 b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any .unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. 5. Provide several signs along the wetland edge on the warehouse site. The number and placement of these signs shall be determined by staff. These signs shall prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping in or around the wetland. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Boardmember Johnson seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. { ) MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Agenda J.. Aotion by Counci-I Endors'ed..._.., Modified..._.. .... Michael A. McGuir , ity M 'nag Red ec . . Date Bruce K. And ct r of arks and Recreation November 16, 1 for the November 23, 1998 City Council Meeting 1999 Maplewood in Motion Bids INTRODUCTION The Maplewood in Motion is printed 12 times each year. Four of the issues are 32 pages in length and eight issues are 8 pages in length. The city prepares formal bid specifications each year. Three bids were received and opened and read aloud on Thursday, November 12, 1998. BACKGROUND The 1999 budget for printing Maplewood in Motion is $38,360. There were three formal bids received which were as follows: ► State of Minnesota - $31,442.60 ► Winslow Printing (60 lb. Husky paper) - $41,586 (60 lb. Badger paper) - $43,220 ► iDM - $38,495 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city award the low bid to State of Minnesota in the amount of $31,442.60 for the printing of the 1999 Maplewood in Motion newsletter. k& mem AGENDA ITEM T Action by ®ncll: AGENDA REPORT Endorsed......... Modifie TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Rejected...-,,,-- r Da e FROM: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager RE: Meeting on Fundraising for Proposed City Purchase of the Historic Bruentrup Farm DATE: November 16,, 1998 INTRODUCTION At its November 9, 1998 regular meeting, the Maplewood City Council listened to representatives from the White Bear Center for the Arts who expressed their support for the city to purchase the Historic Bruentrup Farm. Council had been presented with a report from the organization which detailed plans for their use of the farm. A detailed staff report presented council with facts and figures regarding operational costs, potential for historical status, and a possible shared use of the farm. Bruce Mogren from Edina Realty said that after discussion with the Bruentrups, they would agree to a 90 -day extension on the city's option to purchase the 6.26 acre parcel. BACKGROUND Previously at its October 12, 1998 meeting, the city council listened to a number of residents who expressed their opinions regarding the city's opportunity or first option to purchase the Bruentrup Farm. The vast majority of the comments and calls received supported the preservation of the farm. In a fact finding mission, the city council visited the site on October 22, 1998 to learn first- hand the condition of the farm's buildings. On November 13, 1998 I met with members of the White Bear Center for the Arts, Pete Boulay from the Maplewood Historical Society, and Mike Ericson to discuss fundraising plans to renovate the farm to provide space for a regional arts center, Maplewood Historical Society, and a living, working farm. The potential for a joint-shared facility with the White Bear Center for the Arts, Maplewood Historical Society, and the city's Parks and Recreation Department should be considered as an option for the council in exploring options on how to reuse the farm and its buildings. We discussed a total fundraising goal of $1 million dollars and a halfway goal of $500,000 within 60 days in order for the council to gauge community support for a referendum. Many concerns were raised by the two groups but we agreed that the city will only serve as a facilitator for the fundraising project. Pete Boulay will design a promotional brochure to generate Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers November 16, 1998 Page 2 community interest and formal support for the project in the form of a personal financial pledge. It will not be collected unless the project moves forward to a referendum. City Attorney Patrick Kelly will draft language to be used to collect financial pledges during the fundraising drive in the event the council goal is not met. A meeting of the Board of Directors of the White Bear Center for the Arts was held on Tuesday, November 17, 1998 at which members discussed the opportunity to participate in a fundraising effort with the Maplewood Historical Society. Both organizations have or will receive 501C-3 status as tax- exempt organizations which allows them to receive pledges which are tax deductible. We plan to meet after the meeting to discuss the results of their board meeting and whether there is formal support from the White Bear Center for the Arts. I also met with Bruce Mogren last week to negotiate the purchase price for the Bruentrup Farm and we are working out a price consistent with market rates for commercial property. He again agreed to extend to the city the 90 -day option to purchase the farm after which the Bruentrups will sell the property to a developer who wants to build in the spring. RECOMMENDATION The city council should accept this report and consider the purchase of the farm by referendum for combined uses with the Maplewood Historical Society, White Bear Center for the Arts, and the city's parks department if the $500,000 goal is met in 60 days from the November 9, 1998 council meeting. A 60 -day time frame would make the day of January 9, 1999 as the deadline for pledge commitments towards the purchase of the Bruentrup Farm. A progress report update on this issue will be presented to the council at all upcoming meetings under Administrative Presentations. WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 1998 SAINT PAUL PIONEER PRESS Maplewood outlines plan fiorb.uying old farmstead Race to D Fundwraim"ng goal, other objectives set; private buyer waits KARL J. KARLSON STAFF WRITER C itizens who want to preserve the last farmstead in Maplewood as a historical site or community center have 60 days to get $500,000 in pledges from the pub- lic, or the property will be sold to a developer. Early this year, the owners of the farm -=- Bill and RayDelle Bruentrup — were talking with city officials about the municipals- ; ty buying it and preserving the farmstead. When nothing came of that, a private developer this fall offered $1.8 million for the prop- erty. The Bruentrups then gave the city until mid- November to buy the farm, but this week they agreed to a 90 -day extension after the Maplewood City Council voted Monday to negotiate with the Bruentrups to buy the farm. However, the deal has several contingencies. The council, con- cerned about operating expenses if the farmstead were turned into a historical site or community cen- ter, said private sources need to pledge $1 million for an endow- ment to pay for ongoing costs. Half of that must be pledged with- in 60 days. If the $500,000 is pledged, the council said, there will be a refer- endum Feb. 16 to see whether the public supports buying the farm. By then,_ officials expect to have worked out a firm price and other provisions with the Bruentrups. Their real estate agent, Bruce Mo- gren, said the Bruentrups want the city to buy the property but need to see some concrete action soon because they have a private buyer. Peter Boulay of the Maplewood Area Historic Society said the pledge drive will be an effort of the society and the White Bear Arts Council. He said the drive will help judge how much - public support exists for preserving the farm as a regional facility. "At least we've taken the first step. The council has given us a chance," he said. The farm, across White Bear Avenue from Maplewood Mall, has been in the Bruentrup family since 1891. At one time, it covered 170 acres, but most of the property has been sold off . Now, 6 1 /2 acres remain. The farmstead includes a five-bedroom brick house, a barn and several outbuildings. In other action, the council vot- ed 3 -2 to reject investing $300,000 in new equipment for the city's emergency dispatching center. In- stead, the council ordered staff to get more information about con- tracting with Ramsey County to handle police and fire dispatching for the city. City Manager Mike McGuire said a change in the dispatching could be accomplished by Jan. 1. If Maplewood contracts for dis- patching services, North St. Paul and Oakdale are likely to follow. Those two jurisdictions now con- tract with Maplewood for dis- patching. Karl J. Karlson can be reached at kkarl- son @p1onee or (65 1) 228 -5260. House GOP plans t 0 push for tax cuts PATRICK SWEENEY STAFF WRITER of the proposed tax cuts. Durin his campaign f or over- g g Jan y 5 and May 17 ' the scheduled end of the legislative session. farmers during the first half of 1999. Coleman estimated that cost R epubli - support for nor, Ventura said several times The tax cuts backed by Sviggum at $150 million. SETTING that he favors a one- chamber, or are similar to those proposed dur- Ingison said the Revenue De- cans in the THE unicameral, Legislature. ing the gubernatorial campaign by partment budget planning esti- Minnes House Will AGENDA Ventura will resent his own P tax - and - spending plan for Minne- St. Paul Mayor Norm Coleman, the Republican candidate defeated P mates made in August forecast a state budget balance of about $1.2 use their Rep ublicans, who p sota in a state budget, which he is g by Ventura. Sviggum said Cole - billion at end of the next biennium new w ma�ori - dust won control scheduled. to recommend to the man and the Republican House (June 30, 2001). That projection P ty status to of the Minnesota Legislature shortly after it con- candidates jointly developed a assumes expenditures will en- try to enact House, also are venes Jan.5. budget plan, crease no more that 2.5 percent a a $500 mil- 1 i o n - a -year likely to revive a ballot Ventura could not be reached Sviggum said he wants the year. State spending has increased significantly more than that in re p ackag e of referendum to Tuesday for comment on S i - v g gum s tax -cut proposals. Top DFL House to adopt three major tax o P � cuts. cen years, however. t h . tax cuts in the next le g - decide whether to make the legislative leaders -- Senate Ma- ■ Ahalf- percent reduction in the But Sviggum said he was confi- dent the state can afford the per - _ jority Leader Roger Moe, DFL - two lowest state income tax rates mnnnrn+ +nv I011 +Q and ndfl^ri hn Chippewa DENNIS LIEN STAFF WRITER I n an effort Daily updates or to provide the Waabanong support for ("back back to the their legal East ") Run from team, Chip- Lac du Fiambeai pewa run- Wis., to ners carry- Washington, i n g a D.C., are s p i r i t u a l available at treaty staff www.win.bright, plan to em- net /~glifwcls/ bark this morning on a long- distance relc run from Lac du Flambeau, Wh to Washington, D.C. The run, expected to take I days, will conclude with a sacr( fire to be tended for four day followed by a sunrise ceremor moments before the U.S. Suprerr. Court hears oral arguments Dec. on whether Chippewa Indians sti have special privileges to hun fish and gather on land they so] to the federal government in 183 Lower courts have ruled th< eight Chippewa bands retain tho! rights, but the state of Minnesot and several counties and landowi ers disagree and have appeale The disputed territory includ( most of Lake Mille Lacs and all c parts of 12 east - central Minnesol counties. The Supreme Court is e: petted to issue a final decisi( TODAY IS V Banks -- Some banks will t announced they will be open Rao� 1l/lntrnrnlif -erg Trnn t A' Q ' 1 a i I � November 20, 1998 ; s p Honorable Mayor George Rossbach WHITE BEAR Honorable Members of.the City Council of the Cit of Maplewood' ENTER 1830 East County Road B FOR THE Maple MN 55109 ARTS n Dear Mayor Rossbach and Members of the City Council, Thank you for the .opportunity to present our vision for a Cultural Center at the Bruentrup Farm Site during your November -, 9 council meeting. As written in our proposal and stated at the meeting, our Center's participation in the project was contingent on Board approval of the plan at its November meeting. 'Unanimously, Board members of the White Bear Center for the Arts see many exciting possibilities for collaboration at th site with the City of Maplewood, the Maplewood Historical Society, and the broader community to enrich the cultural life of area residents. However, after preliminary research, and lengthy discussidn, the Board determined that the task of raising $500,000 in pledges,for an operating endowment in 60 days or less'is clearly impossible for , our small organization at this time. Our staff of three part -time employees and :volunteers are Currently working on a fundraising campaign for the Center's 1999 operating budget. All of our staff and volunteer resources must be committed to fulfilling that immediate need. We understand that the Council suggested this ambitious fundraising effort as a means for discovering whether public financial support for operating funds is available before holding a referendum on .purchasing the Bruentrup Farm. Our ' Board .concurred that this information is vitally important to all of the organizations involved in the collaboration as we contemplate long -term plans for 3 the site. Given -the time constraints on this decision and the limited staff and human resources of the lwo small nan profit organizations involved; our Board suggests that there. is a more accurate, reliable and .efficient method of gauging the level of public financial support than the proposed short -term pledge drive. Our Board recommends that a marketing research firm be employed to undertake a statistically accurate survey to measure the level of financial support for operations we could expect from the surrounding, communities. The WBCA contacted one such local firm, Decision Resources whicU has done similar work for Maplewood and for adjacent local governments in the past. Decision Resources executives are interested in the project and would be able to complete a thorough survey within the 60 day timeframe for less than $5,000. With. reliable, comprehensive survey information i.n hand, all of the collaborating , parties could make well - informed decisions. a The Board of the White Bear Center for the Arts remains vitally interested in the Bruentrup Farm as,.a site for a regional cultural center. We look to continuing. collaboration. a Sinc , Vi ctori a Cox Board President CC City Manager & Assistant • 2228 FOURTH STREET Peter Boulay of Maple Historical Society WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 Decision Resources PHONE: 651.407.0597 V '. FAX: 651.429.1.569 4 AGENDA ITEM � Z AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager RE: Responses to Police and Fire Dispatch Service Questions Raised by Public at November 9, 1998 City Council Meeting DATE: November 16, 1998 INTRODUCTION At the city council's request, I have prepared a list of questions raised by the public at the November 9, 1998 City Council Meeting. City Clerk Karen Guilfoile reviewed the audiotape and videotape of the council meeting and transcribed all questions raised including the answers provided at the time of the meeting. She paid particular attention to the crafting of the questions and was careful so there was no duplication. Assistant to the City Manager Mike Ericson coordinated the response effort with answers provided by Police Chief Don Winger, Fire Chief Joel Hewitt, and Ramsey County Sheriff Bob Fletcher. For clarification purposes, I have listed the questions verbatim from the meeting with appropriate answers as offered by the respective public safety experts. 1. Q: Are Landfall's 911 calls answered by Washington County? If so, how does the process work? A: No. 911 calls generated from Landfall are answered by Maplewood dispatchers. 2. Q: How would the delivery of service be affected by having dispatch located with the County? A: a. Instead of one dispatcher to answer the telephone, the city will have at least four and some times five dispatchers to answer emergency phone calls, dispatch fire, police, and EMS services and monitor activity related to any emergency. In addition, Ramsey County has more staff to call on in an emergency situation to provide more support for any emergency that may arise requiring more than the regular staffing. b. The city will have instant access to all of the updated technology that the county currently employs including: GIS mapping, tear and runs in the fire stations, CAD system, and MDT's. officers in the City of Maplewood will be able to view calls for service on their MDT's from all other agencies that the County dispatches for and will be able to communicate with anyone who is on the CAD/MDT system shared by the County via their MDT. This includes the city's of Roseville, Mounds View, New Brighton, White Bear Lake, St. Paul, and North St. Paul. c. officers in the City of Maplewood will be on a shared frequency with surrounding police agencies who will also be monitoring calls that occur near borders like Roseville and Ramsey County. The officers and firefighters in the field will be more informed and better served by being dispatched from the same location by personnel who know what is going on throughout the area. d. The City of Maplewood would be joining a Dispatch Center that was singled out by the State Legislative Auditor's Committee on Best Practices for recognition as one of the ten most innovative communication centers in the State of Minnesota. The committee pointed out five areas in Ramsey County's Center that other agencies could emulate including training, procedure manual, shared MDT system, shared CAD system, and the design of the new center. 3. Q: If Maplewood builds a new development, how long would it take to have it entered into the County's GIS mapping system? A: At the time a new development is approved by the city, copies of the plat would be submitted to the Communications Director in Ramsey County who will put the plans in the Geo Data Base with the new addresses. By the time the development is open for new home construction, it will already be in the GIS mapping system for use by dispatchers. In addition, the Communications Center Director has regular contact with the Metro 911 Board to verify addresses in the Geo Data Base and compare new installations to both the 911 Master Street Address Guide and the Geo Data Base. 4. Q: How do cell phone users calling 911 affect the level of calls received by dispatch? A: With the increase in cell phone usage, the amount of multiple 911 calls for the same incident has increased significantly which has impacted the workload of dispatchers. At present all cell phone 911 calls are answered by the Minnesota State Patrol at their answering points throughout the State of Minnesota. The State Patrol then either dispatches one of their units or transfers the call to a municipal or county agency. The transferred calls come into the agency's 911 lines. In the past several years there has been a great increase in the number of cell phones in use and in the public's willingness to report incidents they observe. It should also be noted cell phone calls using 911 are 2 toll -free and the caller is not billed. Technology is changing in 911 cell phone usage to direct the calls to the local or county dispatch centers. This means the State Patrol will not get all the 911 calls and local /county dispatch centers will have to do the screening. It also means calls intended for the State Patrol will have to be transferred to that agency. This will increase the workload of local and county dispatch centers. The increase of cell phones has been very positive with regard to public safety issues. The use of cell phones will continue to increase as prices for telephone equipment and services continue to drop. 5. Q: Would the City's dispatchers longevity and vacation benefits be transferred to the County? A: Longevity for purposes of eligibility for severance pay, vacation pay, vacation accrual, and retiree health insurance would have to be approved by the Ramsey County Board as part of the transfer of employees. Sheriff Fletcher supports the transfer of all these benefits and would strongly support them to the County Board as part of the transfer of Maplewood employees to the County. 6 Q: If the County dispatches for Maplewood and we do not have twenty-four hour staffing at our police department, will the County have a phone line available at our station for public availability if there is a problem? A: Yes. There will be a specific telephone line installed at City Hall. This line will be answered by the Ramsey County Communications Center. If needed, an officer will be dispatched to City Hall to meet with the individual(s). This is how North Saint Paul, Roseville, Oakdale and many other suburban agencies respond to requests for services since they do not offer twenty -four hour staffing. In the City of Saint Paul, the Eastern District Office and the Central District Office do not have any type of telephone line for after -hour usage. One district office had a pay phone, one district office had a direct line to the Saint Paul Police Departments Communications Center, and none of Saint Paul's Storefront Offices had direct telephones to the communications center. 7. Q: Will the Fire Department purchase new pagers? If so, what is the estimated cost? A: Annually, the Fire Department replaces several pagers due to replacement of unrepairable or damaged pagers. It is the fire chief's understanding and experience in changing communications centers that the Maplewood Fire Channel would remain 3 Maplewoods' . The County would provide a telephone data line from the County Communications Center to the fire department base station transmitter at our City Hall. This would provide communications with no need to replace or reread pagers or reprogram mobile. and portable radios. 8. Q: CJIS`INCIC connections would be handled as a dual recipient system as is done with other contract agencies, that is, messages would be sent to both Maplewood and the County simultaneously for required responses. Is there a cost to this? If so, approximate amount? A:The Minnesota Department of Public Safety (MN.DPS) charges us a service fee of $15 per month for each CJIS/NCIC terminal. There is also a monthly charge from US West. Mr. Phil Powell estimates we would need two terminals to enter stolen records, to obtain criminal history checks, to run vehicle and driver license queries. Mr. Powell estimates the total annual cost at approximately $1,450. According to Mr. Powell there is no cost for maintaining a duel system. We would post a notice with MN DP S stating the hours our terminal would be staffed. We would be expected to respond to queries during those times. At other times the County would respond for the Maplewood Police Department. 9. Q: Record checks and criminal history checks would be handled by clerical staff. Would current clerical staff absorb this work currently done by the dispatchers or would the city hire additional staff? If a new hire, what would be the annual cost? This question was raised by Mr. Peaslee in his letter. He restated it at the meeting and said it was not answered. Mr. Juenemann also asked the question. A: Some of the record checks and criminal history checks will be completed by clerical staff. Some will be completed by police officers or investigators. In many police agencies, officers and investigators complete all of their own record and criminal history checks. At this time there is no plan to hire additional clerical employees. Currently, there are four clerical employees assigned to the records unit and one of the positions is vacant. The city is in the process of filling that position. We do not plan on adding any additional personnel. If more help is needed in the future a parttime clerk- typist could be added at a cost of $14,877 a year. 10. Q.• Security arrangements would change. Alarm monitoring could be contracted and building security would fall upon officers. If the city had to change current security arrangements and /or contract fog alarm monitoring, what would the cost be? n A: Police officers would become responsible for the monitoring of the police department /city hall building. This is how many agencies provide security to unstaffed facilities. One source in the alarm business stated that monitoring of alarms would be at a cost of $13.50 per month per location. A location is a street address. There may be several alarms in each location. The City of Maplewood monitors four alarms at the present time 11. Q: If you change the hours of clerical personnel to have staff available to the public during non - business hours, would this be a part -time position? Full -time? What would this additional person cost the city? A: We currently have a full -time clerk - typist position open. It has been advertized for afternoon and evening hours. There would be no additional cost to the city. 12. Q: Who will handle call -out problems concerning sewer problems or road conditions? This question was raised in Mr. Peaslee 's letter and he restated it again and said that it was not answered.. A: After hours calls for Public Works Department problems like sewer or road conditions are already handled by Ramsey County dispatchers for all the cities they serve including: Roseville, Mounds View, Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Arden Hills, Gem Lake, Shoreview, Little Canada, Vadnais Heights, North Oaks, White Bear Township, and New Brighton via call out procedures provided by each of the cities. This procedure would be followed according to the wishes of the City of Maplewood. The City of Maplewood would provide the county with its call out list and procedures to follow just like other cities served by the County Dispatch Center. 13. Q: Once transferred to the County will the dispatchers still be members of A. F. S. C. M. E. 911 operators or will they become members of a Teamsters Local? A: Their current contract expires at the end of the year so it is not known at this time. The Ramsey County Dispatchers are A.F.S.C.M.E. members at this time. 14. Q: If the dispatchers move, who will handle the following work that is now done by them such as: background checks, case numbers, pawn shop lists, orders for protection, and traffic tickets. A: The background checks are already completed by police officers. (Background checks are usually completed on new employees. The extent of the background investigation depends on the position applied for). Criminal history checks are completed by clerical staff, police officers, and investigators. Case numbers will be assigned by county personnel just like for other agencies within the county. Pawn shop lists will be completed by investigators. Orders for protection will be completed by investigators or clerical staff. Traffic tags will be entered by clerical staff. 15. Q: What will happen with parts of the police department that will no longer be used, such as: garage door openers, holding cells, and who will handle the 777 -8191 non - emergency numbers? A. Dispatchers currently monitor holding cells when they are occupied. This monitoring is via camera. Police officers must - present when holding cells are occupied. Officers will be responsible for opening and closing garage doors. The doors are equipped with automatic garage door openers. The openers may need to be modified to allow opening with remote controls. The 777 -8191 phone number will be answered by Ramsey County. The line will be answered, "Maplewood Police Department" and dispatched accordingly. 16 Q: The quote of $300, 000 to update equipment, what capabilities would that give Police and Fire? What all does the $300, 000 figure include? Would it include service from the county? A: It would update the current equipment that we have but it would not give us the same type of equipment, such as GIS mapping, that the County has. The new GIS mapping system would cost approximately another $50,000. 17. Q.• If we updated our equipment will we have the ability to communicate with other jurisdictions and Ramsey County as if it were one system? A: No. 18: Q: Will our paramedics be able to monitor if we are on a new system with the County? A: If we go to Ramsey County all that would change would be the voice on the other end of the line - all other monitoring systems would remain the same. 19. Q: Will our quality of service remain the same if we switch to the County? A: Ramsey County has a impeccable reputation in the area of dispatching, we think our services would improve. C 20. Q: If we go with the County for dispatching, how does that affect emergency management? A: Emergency management has their own radio channel which they maintain. County provided dispatch service would not affect emergency management. 21. Q: If there were a catastrophe and Maplewood's current dispatching system was knocked out, what would our backup system be? A: We would ask the County to dispatch'for us during the time the city was out of operation. 22. Q: If there were a catastrophe and the county system was knocked out, what would the backup system be for dispatching? A: Ramsey County has in place several protective measures to prevent the total loss of communications including backup generators at the current site. However, the county also has a complete backup console at its warrant office in downtown St. Paul with the capability to dispatch from there. This also includes a plan to get the staff to the downtown location in the event of a catastrophe. The County is currently working on getting the St. Paul Communications Center as a backup site should the county's complete system fail and this will be completed in the very near future. The Ramsey County Dispatch Center is currently named in the county wide 911 Plan as the primary backup center for the Maplewood, White Bear Lake, and St. Paul Communications Centers respectively. 23. Q. What is the time line for the 800 megahertz system to be implemented. A: We do not know for sure. The state will be operational in the metropolitan area in 2001. Some units of government in the metropolitan area are in the decision- making process about if they will come on board with the state or not. 24. Q: What is the city's current budget for dispatch services and how much will Ramsey County charge the city? How long would it take to implement the dispatch service? A: The city's budget is $453,020 for 1999 and Ramsey County would charge the city $174,972. The implementation of the new system could be completed by the beginning of the new year. 7 A genda w MEMORANDUM Aotion by Council: TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Endorse SUBJECT: -Code Amendment - F �""�"- Fuel Stations Modifie DATE: November 10, 1998 Date INTRODUCTION Holiday Companies' Request Mark W. Nelson, Manager of Real Estate for Holiday Companies, is requesting that the city council amend the fuel station requirements for "minor" motor fuel stations. (Refer to Mr. Nelson's letter and proposed site plan on pages 3-4.) Mr. Nelson is asking for a code change to permit Holiday to add one additional fuel dispenser at the new Holiday station at 280 McKnight Road South. On October 26, 1998, the city council directed staff to study the code and this requ est. Staff's Request The city staff is requesting that the council delete the code which prohibits parking spaces between self - service fuel dispensers and the attendant's window. EXISTING DISPENSER REQUIREMENTS The code has two categories of fuel stations -minor motor fuel stations and major motor fuel stations. Minor motor fuel stations are defined as "a retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle fuels with a maximum of two dispensers Fuel dispensers shall be designed to serve only one or two cars at once." Major motor fuel stations are defined as "a retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle fuels that has more than two dispensers Major motor fuel stations are required to be at least 350 feet from properties that are planned for residential use. The intent of the code is to keep the more intensive major motor fuel stations further from homes. BACKGROUND February 26, 1996: The city council amended the minor motor fuel station ordinance to allow more than one fuel island, but held the maximum number of fuel dispensers to two. This change allowed a minor motor fuel station to have side -by -side islands with no more than one fuel dispenser on each island. Previously, the code required one island with a maximum of two dispensers on that island. This amendment dropped the reference to the number of islands but instead regulates the permitted number of dispensers. The council also amended the definition of major motor fuel station to mean a facility with more than two dispensers. The council allowed these changes so that the Holiday Station could have two, side -by -side fuel islands with one fuel dispenser on each island instead of one longer island with two dispensers. November 10, 1997: The city council adopted a code change amending the hours of operation for motor fuel stations and maintenance garages. The code had required that these facilities not be open between the hours of 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. The council added a provision that they may allow, or require, different hours of operation by conditional use permit (CUP). This code change was due to Merit Chevrolet's service- garage operation that went past 11 p.m. DISCUSSION Alternatives 1. Allow a maximum of three dispensers for minor.motor fuel stations. 2. Allow three dispensers for minor motor fuel stations and additional ones by CUP. 3. Allow to allow a third dispenser for minor motor fuel stations by CUP. 4. Take no action. Staff is recommending Alternative One. Staff does not see any problem with allowing an additional fuel dispenser for minor motor fuel stations. Presently, there are only two "minor" motor fuel stations in Maplewood. These are the subject Holiday station and the Tom Thumb station at Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road. One more fuel island and dispenser at either of these stations would not have any conceivable affect on the surrounding development. No- Parking in Front of Attendant's Window The reason for our no parking requirement in front of an attendant's window is, presumably, so the attendant can always view the fuel dispensers for safety reasons. The problem with this requirement is that drivers tend to park in these areas even if they are posted for "no parking." The amount of "visual obstruction" caused by a vehicle is negligible. I asked Chris Cahill, the fire protection engineer with the. City of St. Paul's Department of Fire and Safety Services, if there is a state fire code regulation affecting parking at fuel stations. (Mr. Cahill serves as a code consultant for Maplewood.) He said that fuel station operators are required to monitor self - service fuel -pump operations, but it is up to the station to determine how they would do this. The fire safety code does not prohibit parking between the attendant's window and the fuel dispensers. Mr. Cahill further stated that the City of St. Paul does not have such a requirement, nor have they ever found a need for one. The city council should drop this requirement. It is not obeyed by many of the stations in town and is not effective or needed as a safety measure. The Holiday station, furthermore, would not be able to add their third fuel dispenser unless they removed all of the parking stalls on the west side of their building. p: o rdlfuelstat. o rd Attachments: 1. Letter from Mark W. Nelson dated October 14, 1998 2. Proposed Site Plan from Mark W. Nelson 3. Code Change 2 Attachment 1 H011dGY Companies GEN. OFFICE: 4567 WEST 8oth STREET! MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1224 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55440 / PH. 612- 830 -8700 / FAX 612- 830 -8864 CREDIT OFFICE: 5501 W. OLD SHAKOPEE RD. / MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1216 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 / PH. 612- 921 -5200 / FAX 612- 921 -5295 Direct Dial: 612/830 -8767 Fax: 612/830 -1674 E-mail: mnelson @holidayco.com October 14, 1998 Mayor Rossbach and Members of the City Council City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: 3rd Dispenser Island Request for Holiday Stationstore #301 280 McKnight Road South, Maplewood, Minnesota Mayor Rossbach and Councilmembers: Holiday Companies is pleased to tell you our Maplewood Stationstore has been well received and is enjoying the success. We hope the City is equally pleased with our facility. Our success has produced capacity shortages for our customers during higher demand times. This letter is sent to request you direct staff to pursue drafting a zoning code amendment that would allow us, under certain specific criteria, to add a third dispenser island with a Conditional Use Permit. Enclosed is a site plan of our property showing the location of the proposed dispenser island addition. We are confident a zoning code amendment can be crafted to protect the Minor Motor Fuel regulations, while providing an ability to add capacity at our Maplewood Stationstore. Thank you' for your consideration. Sincerely, HOLIDAY COMPANIES Mark W. Nelson Manager of Real Estate /mwn59 Enclosure cc: City Manager Community Development Director 3 FDOD1 la .� �� "Way. Attachment 2 r _J LOWER ANON Rfl. �N � d Y s 1 j 245.00 S a9042030* w J sriu `� � rrAWw imam wrw..A " of sawn is � Q o W � N� NS 3 r Holiday 4 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MOTOR FUEL STATION REQUIREMENTS The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: Section 1. This section changes Sections 36 -6 and 36- 151(b)(9)(h) as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Section 36-6. Definitions, Minor Motor Fuel Station: A retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle fuels with a maximum of three tvva -f26J dispensers. Fuel dispensers shall be designed to serve only two cars at once. Major motor fuel station: A retail business engaged in the sale of rotor vehicle fuels that has more than th ree dispensers. Sections 36- 151(b)(9)(h). Conditional Uses, I I. we e, ttimm speef.".m ( - I QIQ-11 6— wAilmon 614— Iin— 0%9 %1WQ:0%n 1q—:hRF--P 40- Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 1 1998. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes -- Nays -- 5 AGENDA ITEM / AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Michael A. Ericson, Assistant to the City Mana96, RE: Recommendation for Approval of NSP Franchise Agreements DATE: November 13, 1998 INTRODUCTION .Action by Council: Endorsed Rio d i f i a d...... Re J ected.. Date At its November 2, 1998 Council /Manager Workshop meeting, the Maplewood City Council reviewed the draft copies of the proposed NSP electric and gas franchise agreements. The city's original franchise agreements had expired in May 1998 and with the timing of staff turnover had been on hold. The agreements have now been revised accordingly with assistance from the city attorney, city staff, and NSP Community Service Manager John Wertish. BACKGROUND With direction from City Manager Michael McGuire, I met a number of times with Community Service Manager John Wertish to discuss the proposed franchise agreements. I researched comparable franchise agreements with neighboring cities as provided by John Wertish and a few other communities who have already signed franchise agreements. Lastly, I reviewed the issue with League of Minnesota Cities policy to ensure the City of Maplewood's franchise agreements are consistent with the more than 300 franchise agreements NSP has with cities in Minnesota. Language in the city's electric franchise agreement is nearly identical to the City of Roseville's and very similar to the City of White Bear Lake's which is the only city to have a franchise fee. John Wertish was very helpful to ensure that Maplewood's franchise agreements are most current with applicable state statute and similar to our neighboring cities. Upon review by City Attorney Patrick Kelly and Mr. James Strommen, an attorney experienced in franchise agreements, council should know that the proposed franchise agreements have been thoroughly reviewed and revised accordingly to reflect all current state statute and standard policy changes formulated from other cities. RECOMMENDATION The city council should approve the electric and gas franchise agreements with NSP and adopt ordinances respectively. ti. .1mlp Northern States Power Company White Bear Lake Area 1700 East County Road E White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 -4658 November 12, 1998 Mr. Mike Erickson Assistant City Manager 1830 E County Rd B Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797 Dear Mike, Enclosed please find four copies each of the Gas and Electric Franchise Ordinances. The changes we discussed have been incorporated in each document. We have formatted them for execution with "Excerpts of Minutes" attached to each copy for your convenience. Upon final approval by City Council and execution by the City, I will need. the following for routing and acceptance by NSP: • 4 original, signed copies of both gas and electric Franchise Ordinances (8 copies total). • 4 original copies of the Excerpts of Minutes completed and signed by the City Clerk for both gas and electric (8 copies total). • 4 original, signed copies of the Affidavits of Publication, obtained by the City, for both gas and electric (8 copies total). NSP will reimburse the City for this expense. Please forward bill to me at the address above. Once NSP acceptance is completed I will return a fully executed original copy of each gas and electric to the City. If you have any questions or need assistance please call me at 779 -3105. Thank you. Sincerely, n Wertish Community Service Manager ELECTRIC FRANCHISE ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. . CITY OF MAPLEW00% RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN IN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA AN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND TRANSMISSION LINES , INCLUDING NECESSARY POLES, LINES, FIX_ S AND APPUR NANCES FOR THE FURNISHING OF ELECTRIC ENERGY TO THE CITY ITS F44HABITANTS AND OTHERS, AND TO USE THE PUBLIC WAYS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS OF THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MA.PLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. For purp oses of this Ordinance the following capitalized terms listed in alphabetical order shall have the following meanings: City. The City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota.. City Utility System. Facilities used for providing non - energy related public utility service owned or operated by City or agency thereof, including sewer and water service, but excluding facilities for providing heating, lighting or other forms of energy. Commission. The Minnesota. Public Utilities Commission, or any successor agency or agencies, including an agency of the federal government which preempts all or part of the authority to regulate electric retail rates now vested in the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. Company. Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota. corporation, its successors and assigns. Electric Facilities. Electric transmission and distribution towers, poles, lines, guys, necessary appurtenances owned or anchors, conduits,, fixtures, and ary pp operated by Company for p the p urp o se of providing electric energy for public use. NSA' Reference: MAPLWDE2.DOC. Version: 11/11/1998 1 Non- Betterment Costs. Costs incurred by Company from relocation, removal or rearr angement of Electric Facilities that do not result in an improvement to the Electric Facilities. Notice. A writing served by any party or parties on any other party or parties. Notice to Company shall be mailed to the General Counsel, Law Deparhment, 414 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Notice to the City shall be mailed to the City Clerk, 1830 E. County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 -2797. Either party may change its respective address for the purpose of this Ordinance by written notice to the other party. Public Ground. Land owned by the City for park, open space or similar purpose, which is held for use in common by the public. Public Way. Any street, alley, walkway or other public right -of -way within the City. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF FRANCHISE 2.1 Grant of Franchise City hereby grants Company, for a period of 20 years, the right to transmit and furnish electric energ nd other purposes for gh gy for light, heat, power a p public and private use within and through the limits of the City as its boundaries now exist or as they may be extended in the future. For these purposes, Company may construct, operate, repair and maintain Electric Facilities in o over, under and across the Public Ways and p � � Public Grounds of City, subject to the provisions of this Ordinance. Company may do all reasonable thing s necess ary or custom accomplish these purposes, subject, however, to �y to accom p such reasonable regulations as may be imposed by the City pursuant to ordinance and to the further provisions of this franchise agreement. 2.2 Effective Date; Written Acceptance. This franchise shall be in force and effect A and after its passage and its acceptance by Company, and its publication as required by law. An acceptance by Company must be filed with the City Clerk within 90 days after publication. 2.3 Service, Rates and Area. The service to be provided and the rates to be charged by Company for electric service in City are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. The area within the City in which Company may provide electric service is subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 216B.40. 2.4 Publication Expense. The expense of publication of this Ordinance shall be paid by Company. 2.5 Dispute Resolution. If either party asserts that the other party is in default in the peifoimance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining pasty shall notify the other party of the default and the desired remedy. The notification shall be written. NSP Reference: MAPLWDE2.DOC. Version: 11/11/1998 2 Representatives of the parties must promptly meet and attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved widen 30 days of the written notice, the parties may. jointly select a mediator to facilitate further discussion. The parties will equally share the fees and expenses of this mediator. If a mediator is not used or if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 30 days after first meeting with the selected mediator, either party may commence an action in Ramsey County District Court to interpret and enforce this franchise or for such other relief as may be permitted by law or equity for breach of contract, or either party may take any other action permitted by law. SECTION 3, LOCATION, OTHIER REGULATIONS 3.1 Location of Facilities. Electric Facilities shall be located, constructed and maintained so as not to interfere with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel along and over - Public Ways and so as not to disrupt normal operation of any City Utility System previously installed therein. Electric Facilities shall be located on Public Grounds as determined by the City. Company's construction, reconstruction, operation, repair, maintenance and location of Electric Facilities shall be subject to other reasonable regulations of the City to the extent not inconsistent with the terms of this franchise agreement. Company may abandon underground Electric Facilities in place, provided at City's request Company removes abandoned metal or concrete encased conduit interfering with a City improvement project to the extent such conduit is uncovered as part of the City improvement project. 3.2 Field Locations. Company shall provide field locations for its underground Electric Facilities within City consistent with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 216D. 3.3 Street Op Wzs Com an shall not open or disturb any Public Way or Public Comp Ground for any p p p without first having obtained a permit from the City, if required by a separate ordinance for which the City may impose a reasonable fee. Permit conditions p� im p Company imp osed on Com an shall not be more burdensome than those imposed on other utilities for similar facilities or work. Company may, however, open and disturb any Public Way or p .. Public Ground without p ermission from the City where an emergency exists requiring the immediate repair of Electric Facilities. In such event Company shall notify the City by p telephone Y hone to the office designated b the City as soon as practicable. Not later than the second workin g Y da thereafter, Company shall obtain any required permits and pay any required fees. 3.4 Restoration. After undertaking any work requiring the opening of any Public Wa or Public Ground, Company shall restore the same, including paving and its foundation, Y p y to as ood a condition as formerly existed, and shall maintain any paved surface in good g y condition for two Y ears thereafter. The work shall be completed as promptly as weather exmits and if Company shall not promp erfoim and complete the work, remove all dirt, p p Y p P Yp rubbish,, eq bbish e ui ment and material , and put the Public Way or Public Ground in the said NSP Reference: MAPLWDE2.DOC. Version: 11/11/1998 3 condition, the City shall have, after demand to Company to cure and the passage of a reasonable period of time following the demand, but not to exceed five days, the right to make the restoration at the expense of Company. Company shall pay to the City the cost of such work done for or performed by the City. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedy available to the City for noncompliance with this Section 3.4, but the City hereby waives any requirement for Company to post a construction performance bond, certificate of insurance, letter of credit or any other form of security or assurance that may be required, under a separate existing or future ordinance of the City, of a person or entity obtaining the City's permission to install, replace or maintain facilities in a Public Way. 3.5 Shared Use of Poles. Company shall make space available on its poles or towers for City fire, water utility, police or other City facilities whenever such use will not interfere with the use of such poles or towers by Company, by another electric utility, by a telephone utility, or by any cable television company or other form of communication company. In addition, the City shall pay for any added cost incurred by Company because of such use by City. 3.6 Avoid Damage to Electric Facilities. Nothing in this Ordinance relieves any person from liability arising out of the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid damaging Electric Facilities while performing any activity. 3.7 Notice of Improvements. The City must give Company reasonable notice of plans for improvements to Public Ways or Public Ground where the City has reason to believe that Electric Facilities may affect or be affected by the improvement. The notice must contain: (1) the nature and character of the improvements, (ii) the Public Ways and Public Grounds upon which the improvements are to be made, (iii) the event of the improvements, (iv) the time when the City will start the work, and (v) if more than one Public Way or Public Ground is involved, the order in which the work is to proceed. The notice must be given to Company a sufficient length of time in advance of the actual commencement of the work to permit Company to make any necessary additions, alterations or repairs to its Electric Facilities. SECTION 4. RELOCATIONS. 4.1 Relocation of Electric Facilities in Public Wa y s. Except as provided in Section 4.3, if the City determines to vacate a Public Way for a City improvement project, or at City's cost to grade, regrade, or change the line of any Public Way, or construct or reconstruct any City Utility System in any Public Way, it may order Company to relocate its Electric Facilities located therein if relocation is reasonably necessary to accomplish the City's proposed public improvement. Company shall relocate its Electric Facilities at its own expense. The City shall give Company reasonable notice of plans to vacate for a City improvement project, or to grade, regrade, or change the line of any Public Way or to construct or reconstruct any City Utility System. If a relocation is ordered within five years of NSP Relzrence: MAPLWDE2.DOC. Version: 11/11/1998 4 a prior relocation of the same Electric Facilities, which was made at Company expense, the City shall reimburse Company for Non - Betterment Costs on a time and material basis, provided that if a subsequent relocation is required because of the extension of a City Utility System to a previously unserved area, Company may be required to make the subsequent relocation at its expense. Nothing in this Ordinance requires Company to relocate, remove, replace or reconstruct at its own expense its Electric Facilities where such relocation, removal, replacement or reconstruction is solely for the convenience of the City and is not reasonably necessary for the construction or reconstruction of a Public Way or City Utility System or other City improvement. 4.2 Relocation of Electric Facilities in Public Ground Except as may be provided in Section 4.3 City may require Company at Company's expense to relocate or remove its q Electric Facilities from Public Ground upon a finding by City that the Electric Facilities have become or will become a substantial impairment to the existing or proposed public use of the Public Ground. 4.3 Projects with Federal Funding. Relocation, removal, or rearrangement of any Company Electric Facilities made necessary because of the extension into or through City of p Y y a federally -aided highway project shall be governed by the provisions of N innesota Statutes, Section 161.46, as supplemented or amended. It is understood that the right herein granted to Company is a valuable right. Ci shall not order Company to remove or relocate its faciliti p Y City es p when a Public Way is vacated, improved or realigned because of a renewal or a redevelopment plan which is financially subsidized in whole or in part by the Federal Government or any agency thereof, unless the reasonable Non - Betterment Costs of such relocation and the loss and expense resulting therefrom are first paid to Company, but the City need not pay those portions of such for which reimbursement to it is not available. 4.4 No Waiver. The provisions of Section 4 apply only to Electric Facilities constructed in reliance on a franchise and Company does not waive its rights under an easement or prescriptive right, or State or County permit. SECTION 5. TREE TRIMMING. Company may trim all trees and shrubs in the Public Ways and Public Grounds of City interfering with the proper construction, operation, repair and maintenance of any Electric Facilities installed hereunder, provided that Company shall save the City harmless fi - om any liability arising therefrom, and subject to permit or other reasonable regulation by the City. SECTION 6. INDEMNUICATIONO 6.1 Indemnity of City. Company shall indemnify, keep and hold the City free and harmless from any and all liability on account of injury to persons or damage to property NSP IZellerence: MAPLWDE2.DOC. Version: 11/11/1998 5 occasioned by the construction, maintenance, repair, inspection, the issuance of permits, or the operation of the Electric Facilities located in the Public Ways and Public Grounds. The City shall not be indemnified for losses or claims occasioned through its own negligence except for losses or claims arising out of or alleging the City's negligence as to the issuance of permits for, or inspection of, Company's plans or work. The City shall not be indemnified if the injury or damage results from the performance in a proper manner of acts reasonably deemed hazardous by Company, and such performance is nevertheless ordered or directed by City after notice of Company's determination. 6.2 Defense of City. In the event a suit is brought against the City under circumstances where this agreement to indemnify applies, Company at its sole cost and expense shall defend the City in such suit if written notice thereof is promptly given to Company within a period wherein Company is not prejudiced by lack of such notice. If Company is required to indemnify and defend, it will thereafter have control of such litigation, but Company may not settle such litigation without the consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section is not, as to third parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to the City; and Company, in defending any action on behalf of the City shall be entitled to assert in any action every defense or immunity that the City could assert in its own behalf. SECTION 7. VACATION OF PUBLIC WAYS. The City shall give Company at least two weeks prior written notice of a proposed vacation of a Public Way. Except where required for a City improvement project, the vacation of any Public Way, after the installation of Electric Facilities, shall not operate to deprive Company of its rights to operate and maintain such Electric Facilities, until the reasonable cost of relocating the same and the loss and expense resulting from such relocation are first paid to Company. In no case, however, shall City be liable to Company for failure to specifically preserve aright -of -way under Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29. SECTION 8. CHANGE IN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Any change in the form of government of the City shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance. Any governmental unit succeeding the City shall, without the consent of Company, succeed to all of the rights and obligations of the City provided in this Ordinance. SECTION 9. FRANCHISE FEE. 9.1 g agate Ordinance. During n the term of the franchise hereby granted, and in 1 an lieu of emit or other fees being imposed on Company, the City may impose on y p g m p Company a franchise fee of not more than four percent of Company's Gross Revenues as p Y defined. The franchise fee shall be imposed by a separate ordinance duly adopted hereinafter p by the City Council, which ordinance shall not be adopted until at least 60 days after written NSP Reference: MAPLWDE2.DOC. Version: 11/11/1998 6 notice enclosing such proposed ordinance has been served upon Company by certified mail. The fee shall not become effective until at least 60 days after written notice enclosing such adopted ordinance has been served upon Company by certified mail. Section 2.5 shall constitute the sole remedy for solving disputes between Company and the City in regard to the interpretation of, or enforcement of, the separate ordinance. No action by the City to implement a separate ordinance will commence until this Ordinance is effective. A separate ordinance which imposes a lesser franchise fee on the residential class of customers than on other classifications of customers shall not be effective against Company. 9.2 Terms Defined. For the purp ose of this Section 9, the following definitions apply: 9.2.1 "Delivery Component" onent" of electric service means the portion of the retail. rate pai p p d b the customer to co Company for the use of transmission and distribution including nvestment costs and all expenses enses of constructing, operating and p maintaining such facilities. 9.2.2 "Discount Rate" means a reduced electric retail rate for a customer or class of customers approved by the Commission for service to a customer of Company located within City to respond to competition from the threat of (i) self - generation or (u) the conversion of customer- equipment to use a form of energy other than electricity. 9.2.3 "Gross Revenues" means all sums received by Company from the sale del of electrici to its retail customers within the corporate limits of the City, o; del ry electricity . . exc luding an surcha sales tax, miscellaneous tariff charges or any similar addition to exc g y g � Comp an y g purpose ' char es to customers for the of reimbursing Company for the franchise fee, sales tax or similar charge. The term "Gross Revenues" shall also exclude all revenues received by Comp Com an from the sale of electric service provided under a Discount Rate. 9.2.4 "Supply Component" of electric service means the portion of the retail rate paid by the consumer to compensate the supplier for electric capacity and/or energy delivered to the consumer, including investment costs and all expenses of producing or purchasing such capacity and/or energy. City 9.3 Discount Rate Adjustment If the adopts a separate ordinance as described n 9.1 thereafter Comp shall gi City written notice of any Commission m Section p Y � to proceedings relating implementation of a Discount Rate for a specifically identified p the Cit In addition, both a se customer within ty n, crate ordinance and a Discount Rate are in p effect, Comp an y C ma y and Ci mutual a b Y letter agreement that Company will collect y Y �• ee q a h anchise fee on the Discount Rate e qual to, or the equivalent of, the fee or tax the City would have received if the customer had elected to purchase the competing form of energy instead of electric service from Company. NSP Rel; rence: MAPLWDE2.DOC. Version: 11/11/1998 7 9.4 Exclusive Electric Service. Company has agreed to collect and pay any franchise fee imposed pursuant to this Section 9 only so long as the law allows Company to be the exclusive provider of both the Supply Component and the Delivery Component of retail electric service to its defined service area within the City. Company's exclusive service status is currently provided under Muuiesota. Statutes, Section 216B.37 et sea. If Company is no longer the exclusive provider of both the Supply Component and the Delivery Component of retail service within City, Company's obligation to collect and pay a franchise fee on such retail electric service shall terminate upon 20 days notice to City. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, Company agrees to collect and pay any applicable franchise fee imposed by the City on the revenues from the Delivery Component of electric service provided by Company to retail customers located within the City under the applicable Commission- approved Delivery Component of Company's retail electric service rates and Company further agrees to collect the franchise fee on the Supply Component to the full extent the City is authorized by law, and implements such authorization, to collect the fee or its equivalent amount from all entities providing the Supply Component through electric distribution facilities operated by Company by means of a surcharge of equal amount on Company's billings to its customers within the City, or by such other means as the Commission has authorized. 9.5 Collection of the Fee. The franchise fee shall be payable qua.tterly and shall be based on the Gross Revenues of Company during complete billing months during the period for which payment is to be made. The payment shall be due the last business day of the month following the period for which the payment is made. The percent fee may be changed by ordinance from time to time; however, each change shall meet the same notice requirements and the percentage may not be changed more often than annually. Such fee shall not exceed any amount which Company may legally charge to its customers prior to payment to the City by imposing a surcharge equivalent to such fee in its rates for electric service. Company may pay the City the fee based upon the surcharge billed subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectibles, refunds and correction of erroneous billings. The time and manner of collecting the franchise fee is subject to the approval of the Commission. Company agrees to make its Gross Revenues records available for inspection by the City at reasonable times. 9.6 Conditions on the Fee. The separate ordinance imposing the fee shall not be effective against Company unless it lawfully imposes and the City quarterly or more often collects a fee or tax of the same or greater equivalent amount on the receipts from sales of energy within the City by any other energy supplier, provided that as to such a supplier, the City has the authority to require a franchise fee or to impose a tax. In the event the City cannot collect the same or greater equivalent amount from any other energy supplier, Company agrees to collect and pay any applicable franchise fee imposed by the City on the revenues from the Delivery Component of electric service provided by Company to retail customers located within the City under the applicable Commission- approved Delivery Component of Company's retail electric service rates. This franchise fee on the Commission- NSP Reference: NIAPLWDE2.DOC. Version: 11/11/1998 8 approved Delivery Component of electric retail service shall apply whether Company or another entity provides the Supply Component of the retail electric service to such customer. pp Y p The "same or greater equivalent amount" shall be measured, if practicable, by comparing amounts collected as a franchise fee from each similar customer, or by comparing, as to similar customers the ercenta e of the annual bill represented by the amount collected for p g p the franchise fee oses. The franchise fee or tax shall be applicable to energy sales for any p� p energy use related to heating, cooling, or lighting, as well as to the supply of energy needed to run machinery appliances liances on premises located within or adjacent to the City, but shall not p apply l to energy sales for the purpose of providing fuel for vehicles. If Company specifically consents in writin g to a franchise or separate ordinance collecting or f ailing to collect a fee from another energy supplier lier in contravention to this Section 9.6, the foregoing conditions will be waived to the extent of such written consent. 9.7 Fee Reo ener. The City, after the effective date of this franchise ag reement , may desire to amend the franchise so that Company may collect a franchise fee in a different amount or format from the fee authorized in the preceding provisions of this Section 9. If so, the City may give Company Notice to amend this franchise agreement to authorize collection of a franchise fee by separate ordinance in an amount and upon such terms and conditions as Company at that time is willing to incorporate in its ' electric franchise agreements with other cities of the second, third, or fourth class in the seven - coup met ro p olitan area. Upon receipt of such Notice, Company shall seven p neg otiate in good faith with City to so amend this franchise agreement. If agreement is not reached within 90 days after said Notice, the City may terminate this franchise on agreement u 3 0 days prior written Notice enclosing a proposed amendment based g p Y ua e upon the lang Company has agreed to in an electric franchise agreement with at least p g g p two other of such cities, unless Company, gives Notice to the City within said 30 -day p eriod that it will immediately agree to accept an amendment to this franchise agreement on the same terms and conditions as is set forth in the City's Notice. The termination will not be effective until after completion of any dispute resolution proceeding under Section 2.5 commenced by Comp Com an within said 30 -day period, which proceeding confirms the City's action to be in compliance with this Section 9. SECTION 10. PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE. 10.1 Severabflity. Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared sep arate from every other section, provision, or part; and if any section, provision, or part shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other section, provision, or part. Where a p rovision of an other City ordinance conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance, the p Y tY provisions of this Ordinance shall prevail. 10.2 Limitation on Applicability. This Ordinance constitutes a franchise agreement between the City and Company as the only parties and no provision of this fi shall in any way inure to the benefit of any third person (including the public at NSP Reference: MAPLWDE2.DOC. Version: 11/11/1998 9 large). so as to constitute any such person as a third party beneficiary of the agreement or of any one or more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action in any person not a party hereto. SECTION 11, AMCENDMENT PROCEDURE Either party to this franchise agreement may at any time propose that the agreement be amended to address a subject of concern and the other party will consider whether it agrees that the amendment is mutually appropriate. If an amendment is agreed upon, this Ordinance may be amended at any time by the City passing a subsequent ordinance declaring the provisions of the amendment, which amendatory ordinance shall become ef fective upon the filing of Company's written consent thereto with the City Clerk within 90 days after the effective date of the amendatory ordinance. Passed and approved: , 1998. Mayor Attest: City Clerk NSP Kelerence: MAPLWDE2.D0C. Version: 11/11/1998 10 EXCERPTS OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA , 19� A meetin of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, g duly 1 called convened and held in accordance with law, was called to order by Mayor on the day of , 19 at _o'clock .m. at the Council Chamber in the City. The following members, constituting a legal quorum, were present: Councilmember entitled: introduced a certain Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, A NIINNESOTA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN IN THE CITY- OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, AN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND TRANSMISSION LINES, INCLUDING NECESSARY POLES, LINES, FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, FOR THE FURNISHING OF ELECTRIC ENERGY TO TIM CITY, ITS INHABITANTS, AND OTHERS, AND TO USE THE PUBLIC WAYS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS OF THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES* and on motion made seconded, and duly adopted, the above - entitled Ordinance was read. Thereafter a motion was made by Councilmember and seconded b y Councilmember that the above - entitled Ordinance be adopted as read and in its entirety. Page 1 of 2. NSP Reference: MAPLWD- E.MIN. Date Printed: 11/11/98 On roll call the vote was as follows: AYES NAYS The Mayor then declared said motion duly carried. and the above - entitled Ordinance duly passed and adopted, and ordered the City Clerk to publish the same in accordance with the law in such case made and provided. I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I am City Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, and that I am custodian of its records, that the above is a true and correct copy of a part of the minutes of the meeting of the City Council of the City held on 19 City Clerk Page 2 of 2. NSP Reference: MAPLWD- E.MIN. Date Printed: 11/11/98 GAS FRANCHISE ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN IN THE CITY OF MA.PLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, A GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INCLUDING THE NECESSARY GAS PIPES,' MAINS AND APPURTENANCES FOR THE TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF GAS TO THE CITY, ITS INHABITANTS, AND OTHERS, AND TRANSMITTING GAS INTO AND THROUGH THE CITY, AND TO USE THE PUBLIC WAYS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS OF THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1, DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Ordinance, the following capitalized terms listed in alphabetical order shall have the following meanings: City. The City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. City Utility System. Facilities used for providing non - energy related public utility service owned or operated by City or agency thereof, including sewer and water service, but excluding facilities for providing heating, lighting or other forms of energy. Commission. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, or any successor agency or agencies, including an agency of the federal government which preempts all or part of the authority to regulate gas retail rates now vested in the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. Company. Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and assigns. Gas Facilities. Gas transmission and distribution .pipes, mains, regulators and necessa. y appurtenances owned or operated by Company for the purpose of providing natural gas, manufactured gas, or other form of gaseous energy for public use. NSP Reference: MAPLWD -G.SRA Version: 11/11/1998 1 Non - Betterment Costs. Costs incurred by Company from relocation, removal or rearrangement of Gas Facilities that do not result in an improvement to the Gas Facilities. Notice. A writing served by any party or parties on any other party or parties. Notice to Company shall be mailed to the President, NSP Gas, 825 Rice Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55117. Notice to the City shall be mailed to the City Clerk, 1830 E. County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 -2797. Either party may change its respective address for the purpose of this Ordinance by written notice to the other party. Public Ground. Land owned by the City for park, open space or similar purpose, which is held for use in common by the public. Public Way. Any street, alley, walkway or other public right -of -way within the City. SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF FRANCHISE 2.1 Grant of Franchise. City hereby grants Company, for a period of 20 years, the non - exclusive right to transmit and distribute gas for public and private use within and through the limits of the City as its boundaries now exist or as they may be extended in the future. For these purposes, Company may install, operate, repair and maintain Gas F acilitie s in, on, over, under and across the Public Ways and Public Grounds of City, subject to the p Company provisions of this Ordinance, Com an may do all reasonable things necessary or customary to accomplish these purposes, subject, however, to such reasonable regulations as may be unposed b the City pursuant to ordinance and to the further provisions of this franchise p Y tY p agreement. 2.2 Effective Date; Written Acceptance. This franchise shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and its acceptance by Company, and its publication as required by law. An acceptance by Company must be filed with the City Clerk within 90 days after publication. 2.3 Service and Rates. The service to be provided and the rates to be charged by Company for gas service in City are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. 2.4 Publication Expense. The expense of publication of this Ordinance shall be paid by Company. 2.5 Dispute Resolution. If either party asserts that the other party is in default in the performance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining party shall notify the other parry of the default and the desired remedy. The notification shall be written. Representatives of the parties must promptly meet and attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved within 30 days of the written notice, the pasties may jointly select a mediator to facilitate further discussion. The parties will NSP Reference: MAPLWD -G.SRA Version: 11/11/1998 2 equally share the fees and expenses of this mediator. If a mediator is not used or if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 30 days after first meeting with the selected mediator, either party may commence an action in Ramsey County District Court to interpret and enforce this franchise or for such other relief as may be permitted by law or equity for breach of contract, or either party may take any other action permitted by law. SECTION 3. LOCATION, OTHER REGULATIONS 3.1 Location of Facilities. Gas Facilities shall be located, constructed, installed and maintained so as not to interfere with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel, along and over Public Ways and so as not to disrupt normal operations of any City Utility System previously installed therein. Gas facilities shall be located on Public Grounds as determined by the City. Company's construction, reconstruction, operation, repair, maintenance and location of Gas Facilities shall be subject to other reasonable regulations of the City to the extent not inconsistent wifli the teens of this franchise agreement. Company may abandon underground Gas Facilities in place, provided at City's request Company removes abandoned metal pipe interfering with a City improvement project to the extent such metal pipe is uncovered as part of the City improvement project. 3.2 Field Locations. Company shall provide field locations for its underground es within City consistent with the re quirements of - Minnesota Statutes, Chapter Gas Facilities ty q 216D. 3.3 Street Openings. Company shall not open or disturb any Public Way or Public Ground for any purpose without first having obtained a permit from the City, if required by separate ordinance, for which the City may impose a reasonable fee. Permit conditions imposed on Company shall not be more burdensome than those imposed on other utilities for similar facilities or work. Company may, however, open and disturb any Public Way or Public Ground without permission from the City where an emergency exists requiring the immediate repair of Gas Facilities. In such event Company shall notify the City by telephone to the office designated by the City as soon as practicable. Not later than the second working day thereafter, Company shall obtain any required permits and pay any required fees. JA Restoration. After undertaking any work requiring the opening of any Public Way Company or Public Ground, Com an shall restore the same, including paving and its foundation, to as ood a condition as formerly existed, and shall maintain any paved surface in good g condition for two ears thereafter. The work shall be completed as promptly as weather Y . em its and if Company shall not promptly perform and complete the work, remove all dirt, p � p Y p eq u rubbish e q p i and material, and put the Public Way or Public Ground in the said condition the City shall have, after demand to Company to cure and the passage of a reasonable g eriod of time following the demand, but not to exceed five days, the right to make p the restoration at the expense of Company. Company shall pay to the City the cost of such p p work done for or formed p e� b the City. This remedy shall be in addition to any other Y NSP Reference: MAPLWD -G.SRA Version: 11/11/1998 3 remedy available to the City for noncompliance with this Section 3.4, but the City hereby waives any requirement for Company to post a construction performance bond, certificate of- insurance, letter of credit or any other form of security or assurance that may be required, under a separate existing or future ordinance of the City, of a person or entity obtaining the City's permission to install, replace or maintain facilities in a Public Way. 3.5 Avoid Damage to Gas Facilities. Nothing in this Ordinance relieves any person from .liability arising out of the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid damaging Gas Facilities while performing any activity. 3.6 Notice of Improvements. The City must give Company reasonable notice of plans for improvements to Public Ways or Public Ground where the City has reason to believe that Gas Facilities may affect or be affected by the improvement. The notice must contain: (i) the nature and character of the improvements, (ii) the Public Ways and Public Grounds upon which the improvements are to be made, (iii) the extent of the improvements, (iv) the time when the City will start the work, and (v) if more than one Public Way or Public Ground is involved, the order in which the work is to proceed. The notice must be given to Company a sufficient length of time in advance of the actual commencement of the work to permit Company to make any necessary additions, alterations or repairs to its Gas Facilities. 3.7 Maior Facilities. Before Company constructs any new structure or converts any existing structure for the manufacture or storage of gas, Company shall first obtain the approval of the structure and the location thereof from the City. Such approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld. SECTION 4, RELOCATIONS, 4.1 Relocation of Gas Facilities in Public Ways. Except as provided in Section 4.3 if the City determines to vacate a Public Way for a City improvement project, or at City's cost to grade, regrade, or change the line of any Public Way, or construct or reconstruct any in an Public Wa m order Co City Utility System y y, y p Y to relocate its Gas Facilities located therein if relocation is reasonably necessary to accomplish the City's proposed public imp rovement. Company shall relocate its Gas Facilities at its own expense. The City shall p P Y give Com an reasonable notice of plans to vacate for a City improvement project, or to g p Y grade, re grade, change the line of any Public Way or to construct or reconstruct any City � , or g Utili ty S ystem. stem. If a relocation is ordered within five years of a prior relocation of the same Gas Facilities, which was made at Company expense, the City shall reimburse Company for - Betterment Costs on a time and material basis, , rovided that if a subsequent relocation is p r eq uired because of the extension of a City Utility System to a previously unserved area, 1 eq tY t Y y Comp be required to make the subsequent relocation at its expense. Nothing in thus p Y ma Y r e q Ordinance Comp ires re q uto relocate, remove, replace or reconstruct at its own expense its Gas Facilities where such relocation, removal, replacement or reconstruction is solely for the NSP Reference: MAPLWD -G.SRA Version: 11/11/1998 4 convenience of the City and is not reasonably necessary for.the construction or reconstruction of a Public Way or City Utility System or other City improvement. 4.2 Relocation of Gas Facilities in Public Ground. Except as may be provided in Section 4.3 1) City may require Company at Company's expense to relocate or remove its Gas Facilities from Public Ground upon a finding by City that the Gas Facilities have become or will become a substantial impairment to the existing or proposed public use of the Public Ground. 4.3 Projects with Federal Funding. Relocation, removal, or rearrangement of any Company Gas Facilities made necessary because of the extension into or through City of a federally -aided highway project shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota. Statutes Section 161.46, as supplemented or amended. It is understood that the right herein granted to Company is a valuable right. City shall not order Company to remove or relocate its Gas Facilities when a Public Way is vacated, improved or realigned because of a renewal or a redevelopment plan which is financially subsidized in whole or in part by the Federal Government or any agency thereof, unless the reasonable Non - Betterment Costs of such relocation and the loss and expense resulting therefrom are first paid to Company, but the City need not pay those portions of such for which reimbursement to it is not available. 4.4 No Waiver. The provisions of Section 4 apply only to Gas Facilities constructed in reliance on a franchise and Company does not waive its rights under an easement or prescriptive right, or State or County permit. SECTION 5, INDEMNIFICATION. 5.1 IndeplMly of City. Company shall indemnify, keep and hold the City free and harmless from any and all liability on account of injury to persons or damage to property occasioned by the construction, maintenance, repair, inspection, the issuance of permits, or the operation of the Gas Facilities located in the Public Ways and Public Grounds. The City shall not be indemnified for losses or claims occasioned through its own negligence except for losses or claims arising out of or alleging the City's negligence as to the issuance of permits for, or inspection of, Company's plans or work. The City shall not be indemnified if the injury or damage results from the performance in a proper manner of acts reasonably deemed hazardous by Company, and such performance is nevertheless ordered or directed by City after notice of Company's determination. 5.2 Defense of City. In the event a suit is brought against the City under cu - cumstances where this agreement to indemnify may apply, Company at its sole cost and expense shall defend the City in such suit if written notice thereof is promptly given to Company within a period wherein Company is not prejudiced by lack of such notice. If Company is required to indemnify and defend, it will thereafter have control of such litigation, but Company may not settle such litigation without the consent of the City, which NSP Reference: MAPLWD -G.SRA Version: 11/11/1998 5 consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section is not, as to third parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to the City; and Company, in defending any action on behalf of the City shall be entitled to assert in any action every defense or inununity that the City could assert in its own behalf. SECTION 6, VACATION OF PUBLIC WAYS. The City shall give Company at least two weeks prior written notice of a proposed vacation of a Public Way. Except where required for a City improvement project, the vacation of any Public Way, after the installation of Gas Facilities, shall not operate to deprive Company of its rights to operate and maintain such Gas Facilities, until the reasonable cost of relocating the same and the loss and expense resulting from such relocation are first paid to Company. In no case, however, shall City be liable to Company for failure to specifically preserve aright -of -way under Minnesota. Statutes, Section 160.29. SECTION 7, CHANGE IN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Any change in the for of government of the City shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance. Any governmental unit succeeding the City shall, without the consent of Company, succeed to all of the rights and obligations of the City provided in this Ordinance. SECTION 8, FRANCHISE FEE. The City at the adopting time of ado tin this franchise agreement does not desire to require that Company collect ct a franchise fee from its customers in the City. At a future date during the term o �' f this franchise agreement, the City may determine that it desires franchise fee. If so the City Company to collect a fr may give Company Notice to amend this franchise agreement to authorize collection of a franchise fee by separate ordinance p in an amount and upon such terms and conditions as Company at that time is willing to incorporate in its gas franchise agreements with other cities of the second, third or fourth t of such Notice Company shall metropolitan area. Upon receipt class in the seven - county p p p ne otiate in ood faith with City to so amend this franchise agreement. g g SECTION 9. PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE. Eve section provision, or 9.1 Sever ability. Every � art of this Ordinance is declared p p crate from eves other section, provision, or part; and if any separate y section, provision, or inv alid, it shall not affect an other section, provision, or part. Where a part shall be held inv y ' provision ' of any other Cit i ordinance conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance, the p rovisions of this Ordinance shall prevail. Limitation on A licabili .This Ordinance constitutes a franchise agreement 9.2 Limita pp the only p arties and no between the City and Company as y provision of this franchise shall in p p NSI' Refercilce: MAP[.V D -G.SRA Version: 11/11/1999 6 any way inure to the benefit of any third person (including the public at large) so as to constitute any such person as a third . party beneficiary of the agreement or of any one or more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action in any person not a party hereto. SECTION 10, AMIENDMENT PROCEDURE Either party to this franchise agreement may at any time propose that the agreement be amended to address a subject of concern and the other party will consider whether it agrees that the amendment is mutually appropriate. If an amendment is agreed upon, this Ordinance may be amended at any time by the City passing a subsequent ordinance declaring the provisions of the amendment, which amendatory ordinance shall become effective upon the filing of Company's written consent thereto with the City Clerk within 90 days after the effective date of the amendatory ordinance. Passed and approved: , 1998. Mayor Attest: City Clerk NSP Rellerence: MAPLWD -G.SRA Version: 11/11/1998 7 EXCERPTS OF MINUTES OF MEETING - OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RAMSEY COUNTY, ESOTA ,19 g City A meeting of the Ci Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, duly ned , and held in accordance with law, was called to order by Mayor called, conve he day of 19 o'clock _.m. at the on t y Council Chamber in the City. The following members, constituting a legal quorum, were present: Councilmember introduced a certain Ordinance No. entitled: AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMP , ANY A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN IN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD SOTA, A GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INCLUDING THE NECESSARY GAS PIPES, MAINS AND APPUR TENANCES FOR THE TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF GAS TO THE -CITY, ITS INHABITANTS, AND o RS, T. AND TRANSMITTING GAS INTO AND THROUGH THE CITY, AND TO USE THE PUBLIC WAYS AND PUBLIC G ROUNDS OF 'THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES. and on motion Y made seconded and duly adopted, the above - entitled Ordinance was read. y Thereafter a motion was made b Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember that the above- entitled Ordinance be and as read and in its entirety. Page 1 of 2. NSP Reference MAPLWD- G.MIN. Date Printed: 11/11/98 On roll call the vote was as follows: AYES NAYS The Mayor then declared said motion duly carried and the above - entitled Ordinance duly passed a n d adopted, and ordered the City Clerk to publish the same in accordance with the law in p y p such case made and provided. I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I am City Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota,, and that I am custodian of its records, that the above is a true and correct copy of a part of the minutes of the meeting of the City Council of the City held on , 19 . City Clerk Page 2 of 2. NSP Reference MAPLWD- G.MIN. Date Printed: 11/11/98 1