HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 02-12 City Council PacketSpecial Council Meeting/Pre-Agenda Meeting: 4:45 p.m. - Thursday, February 8, 2001
1. One Day On =Sale Liquor License - Church of the Presentation of the BVM
Council /Manager Workshop - 6: 00 p. m. - Monday, February 12, 2001
Closed to the Public)
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, February 12, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 02 -04
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting 01-02 (January 22, 2001)
2. Minutes of Council/Manager Workshop Meeting (January 22, 200 1)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
1. Ramsey County Attorney - Susan Gaertner
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by
one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Annual Leave Policy
3. Proposed Settlement - AFSCME Clerical /Technical &Maintenance - 2001/2002
4. Proposed Settlement -Metro Supervisory Assn. - 2001/2002
5. Proposed Settlement - LELS Local 4153 - 2001/2002
6. Non -Union Wages and Benefits - 2001/2002
7. Personnel Policies - Revisions
8. Beth Heights Fifth Addition Final Plat (Beth Court, West of Ferndale Street)
9. Conditional Use Permit Review -North Saint Paul Post Office Annex (1686 Gervais Avenue)
10. Conditional Use Permit Review - Maplewood Retail Center (2303 White Bear Avenue)
11. Woodlynn Heights Townhomes #7 Preliminary Plat Time Extension (Woodlyn Avenue)
12. Conditional Use Permit Review - Woodland Hills Church (1740 Van Dyke Street and 1847 Larpenteur
Avenue)
13. Approve AT &T Wireless Site Lease Agreement
14. Surplus Property Disposal - Public Works
15. Budget Adjustments - Police &Fire Departments
16. Agreement to Provide Emergency Management Services to the City of Landfall
17. Transfers from Tax Increment Funds
18. Carry Over of 2000 Appropriations to 2001
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. Tilsen South Neighborhood Streets, Project 00 -04 (4 votes)
A. Order Improvement After Public Hearing
B. Approve Joint Powers Agreement With North St. Paul
2. 7:15 P.M. Conditional Use Permit -Lot Division (1101 County Road C) (Callahan)
3. 7:30 P.M. Rice/Roselawn Auto Sales (1908 Rice Street)
A. Conditional Use Permit
B. Setback Variances
I. AWARD OF BIDS
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Lake Links Trail Master Network Plan
2. Change Order #1, Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Streets, Project 99 -13
3. Ordinance Amendment - Compensation for Elected Officials
4. Grocery Store Inspections
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this
service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make arrangements.
Assistant Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules ofcivility the City ofMaplewood expects ofeveryone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staffand citizens.
It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the
fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively
listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language.
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, January 22, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 01 -02
A. CALL TO ORDER:
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers,
Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
B, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C, ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 00 -01 (January 8, 200 1) as
presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the minutes of Council /Manager Workshop (January _8
2001 ) as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
E, APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
Ml. Compost Site
M2. D . A.R.E. Graduations
M3. Energy Bills
M4. Liquor Licenses
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS:
None
1 -22 -01 1
G. CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - all
1. Approval of Claims
Approved claims.
ACCOUNTS
T1 A T T A T T T
13304.54
137,981:53
228.62
453,801.18
129
Checks #52789 thru #52851 dated 1/9/01
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated V2 thru 1/8/01
Checks #52852 thru #52854 dated 1/9/01
Checks #52855 thru #52929 dated 1/16/01
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 1/9 thru 1/16/01
855,048.83 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
332,435.01 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 115101
25,784.21 Payroll Deduction check #82134 thru #82141 dated 115101
358,219.22 Total Payroll
1,213,268.05 GRAND TOTAL
2. Expenditure of Grant Funds, LLEB G
Approved the expenditure of the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant of $17,031 toward the
purchase of a new D.A.R.E. vehicle. The City's match amount is $1,892, for a total of $18,923.
3. Replacement of Damaged Squads
Approved expenditure to replace damaged squad cars that were involved in accidents due to
weather related road conditions.
4. Purchase of Replacement Squads
Approved expenditure to replace squad cars that are approaching the end of their useful service
life.
1 -22 -01 2
5. Acceptance of Donation - Dayton's
Accepted a $1,000 donation from The Target Corporation, Department Store Division, to be used
by the police department for the purchase of a digital camera and related software.
6. Acceptance of Donation - Countryside Volkswagen -Saab
Accepted a $ donation from Countryside Volkswagen -Saab to be used by the police
department for needed equipment or programs.
7. Pay Equity Report
Approved the pay equity implementation report that is to be filed with the State Department of
Employee Relations by January 31, 2001.
8. Transfer of Funds and Approval of Requisition for Modification to Hazardous Materials/Public
Support Unit
Approved the requisition with Custom Fire and the transfer of funds in the amount of $25,750.00
to cover modifications to the Hazardous Materials/Public Support Unit.
9. Sunday On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal - Beau's, 2289 Minnehaha Avenue East
Adopted the following resolution for an on -sale intoxicating liquor license renewal for Beau's,
2289 Minnehaha Avenue East:
RESOLUTION 01 -01 -007
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY
COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that the following On -Sale Liquor License, has been previously duly
issued by this Council, is hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 2001, with
approval granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and Health
Inspections:
Beau's
Eugene Beaulieu
2289 Minnehaha Avenue East
10. Ramsey Action Programs - Reduction in Food Establishment License Fee
Approved a food establishment license for Ramsey Action Programs to be used at the Concordia
Arms, 2030 Lydia Avenue, and waived the $530.00 fee.
11. Part -time Naturalist Position
Authorized City Manager to recruit and hire a regular part -time naturalist for a six -month period
at 24 hours a week at the adopted union wage level and appointed Judy Horsnell as interim lead
naturalist.
1 -22 -01 3
12. Ramsey County Soccer Partners Grant
Accepted the Ramsey County Partners Grant in the amount of $200,000 to be used to light two
additional soccer fields at the Hazelwood soccer complex and install indoor restroom facilities.
13. Renewal of Landfall Fire Service Contract
Approved a contract in the amount of $16,850.00 between the City of Maplewood and the City
of Landfall which would provide fire protection services to the City of Landfall.
14. Planning Commission's 2000 Annual Report
AcceptedY the Planning Commission's 2000 Annual Report which includes the commission's
activities in the past year and major projects for the new year.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 7:00 P.M. (7:08 P.M.) Comfort Bus Company Conditional Use Permit (1870 Rice Street)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Eric Ahlness presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Lee Rossow, Comfort Bus Company, the Applicant
Kerry Rankin, 206 Roselawn Avenue East, Maplewood
Jim Rankin, 206 Roselawn Avenue East, Maplewood
Lee Rossow, second appearance
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to adopt the following resolution terminating the conditional
use permit for an amusement center at 1870 Rice Street:
RESOLUTION 01 -01 -008
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TERMINATION
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council approved a conditional use permit for an amusement
center at 1870 Rice Street.
WHEREAS, the owner of this property has closed the amusement center and sold the land.
1 -22 -01 4
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has approved a conditional use permit to the new
owner of this property for the operation of a bus terminal.
WHEREAS, this permit termination applies to the following described property:
EISENMENGER AND ZASPEL' S LAKE PARK, RAMSEY CO., MINN., SUBJECT
TO ST AND AVE AND VAC STS AND ALLEYS ACCRUING, THE FOL A TRACT
LYING NWLY OF SOO LINE RY R/W OF THE FOL; LOTS 4 THRU 10 BLK 1, LOT
7 BLK 2, LOTS 5 THRU 32 BLK 4, LOTS 12 THRU 25 BLK 6 AND ALL OF BLK 3.
EISENMENGER AND ZASPEL' S LAKE PARK, RAMSEY CO., MINN., SUBJECT
TO HWY THE FOL VAC ALLEY ACCRUING AND LOTS 33 THRU LOT 39 BLK 4.
EISENMENGER AND ZASPEL' S LAKE PARK, RAMSEY CO., MINN. VAC ST
AND ALLEY ACCRUING AND LOTS 1 THRU 4 BLK 4.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows:
1. The city council approved this permit on November 17, 1977. They subsequently
reviewed this permit many times and considered several changes to this business. The
city council's most recent revision of this permit was on July 10, 2000.
2. On December 18, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council
terminate this permit.
3. The city council held a public hearing on January 22, 2001. City staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council terminate the above - described
conditional use permit because the site has been sold for use as a bus terminal and is no longer
needed as an amusement center.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Collins,
Koppen, Wasiluk
Abstain - Mayor Cardinal
Councilmember Allenspach moved to adopt the following resolution - proving a conditional use
permit for motor - vehicle repair as part of a proposed bus terminal at 1870 Rice Street:
1 -22 -01 5
RESOLUTION 01 -01 -009
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Lee and Craig Rossow, of the Comfort Bus Company, applied for a conditional use
permit to operate a motor - vehicle maintenance garage as part of their bus terminal operation.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1870 Rice Street. The legal description is:
EISENMENGER AND ZASPEL' S LAKE PARK, RAMSEY CO., MINN., SUBJECT
TO ST AND AVE AND VAC STS AND ALLEYS ACCRUING, THE FOL A TRACT
LYING NWLY OF SOO LINE RY R/W OF THE FOL; LOTS 4 THRU 10 BLK 1, LOT
7 BLK 2, LOTS 5 THRU 32 BLK 4, LOTS 12 THRU 25 BLK 6 AND ALL OF BLK 3
EISENMENGER AND ZASPEL' S LAKE PARK, RAMSEY CO., MINN., SUBJECT
TO HWY THE FOL VAC ALLEY ACCRUING AND LOTS 33 THRU LOT 39 BLK 4.
EISENMENGER AND ZASPEL' S LAKE PARK, RAMSEY CO., MINN. VAC ST
AND ALLEY ACCRUING AND LOTS 1 THRU 4 BLK 4.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows:
1. On December 18, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve this permit.
2. The city council held a public hearing on January 22, 2001. City staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council revise the above - described
conditional use permit revision, based on the following reasons:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
1 -22 -01 6
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not,create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is sub. ect to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant shall comply with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements as it
relates to all applicable aspects of their vehicle repair operation.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Collins,
Koppen, Wasiluk
Abstain - Mayor Cardinal
2. 7:20 P.M. Jehovah's Witness Kingdom Hall Worship Center (925 Century Avenue North)
Conditional Use Permit
Design Approval
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Eric Ahlness presented the Planning Commission report.
1 -22 -01 7
e. Boardmember Matt Ledvina presented the Community Design Review Board report.
f. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Gil Shipshock, representing Jehovah's Witnesses, the Applicant
Jerry Hicks, 10680 N. Stone Bridge Trail, Stillwater Township, representing his daughter
and her husband, Angela and Kevin Stafholt, 2707 Brand Avenue
Don Corteau, 6726 Gretchen Lane, Oakdale, member of the Mounds Park/Oakdale
Jehovah's Witness congregation
g Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use
hermit for the Mounds Park/Oakdale Jehovah's Witnesses Kingdom Hall building . and parking
lot expansion proposal at 925 Century Avenue North:
RESOLUTION 01 -01 -010
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mounds Park/Oakdale Jehovah's Witnesses Kingdom Hall applied for a conditional
use permit for a church including their plans to expand their building and parking lot.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 925 Century Avenue North. The legal
description is:
LOT 4, BLOCK 3, AND THE WEST 200 FEET OF LOT 5 BLOCK 3, MIDVALE
ACRES. CERTIFICATE OF TITLE #341392.
PID # 25- 29 -22 -41 -0059
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On January 2, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this permit.
2. On January 22, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city council approves this
permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
1 -22 -01 8
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would -be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction, renovations and improvements shall follow the site plan approved by
the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. Site lights shall only be used when needed at night for services or other church functions.
They shall not be on all night.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the plans date - stamped November 29, 2000 for
the proposed expansion to the Mounds Park/Oakdale Jehovah's Witnesses Kingdom Hall and
parking lot at 925 Century Avenue North. Approval is based on the findings required by the
code and subject to the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
1 -22 -01 9
2. Before obtaining a building permit for the addition, the property owner shall provide the
following for staff approval:
a. A site - lighting plan which shows the proposed lighting fixtures (a "shoe box"
style fixture that fully conceals the lens and bulb is a preferred style), the light
intensity (code limits the maximum light intensity to .4 foot candles at a
residential property line) and the extent of light cast.
b. Revised site and landscape plans showing:
1) A decorative wood fence to be placed on the south side of the proposed
parking lot. This fence shall run from the west edge of the westerly space
to the proposed two -car garage. The fence must be at least six - feet -tall
and >80 percent opaque according to code. Opening(s) shall be provided at
ffie'.bottom of the fence so,
I
stormwate'r runoff is not impeded, if required by
the city engineer.
The applicant shall also review with staff the need for additional screening
on the north side of the parking lot for the home at 2704 Harvester
Avenue. The applicant shall provide any supplemental screening as may
be required by staff.
2) Three six - foot -tall evergreen trees in the grass area in the southwest
corner of the parking lot.
3) At least two handicap - accessible parking spaces and the elimination of the
four handicap - accessible spaces from the northerly driveway.
4) A one -way traffic flow beneath the canopy, with signs posted
accordingly, or provide a two -way, 24- foot -wide drive aisle between the
handicap parking spaces and the median.
C. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan for the city engineer's approval.
This plan shall address the comments and issues addressed by Chris Cavett in the
staff report.
3. Complete the following before occupying the building addition:
a. Provide continuous concrete curbing around any new portions of the parking lot.
b. Restore all ground disturbed during this construction and provide all required
landscaping and screening.
C. Provide at least two handicap - accessible parking spaces. One must be van-
accessible with an eight - foot -wide loading aisle. Handicap - parking signs are to be
provided as the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requires.
1 -22 -01 10
d. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure if there will be any outdoor storage of
refuse. The enclosure must match the building in color and materials and shall
have a closeable gate that is 100 percent opaque. There shall be enough space in
the enclosure to conceal any recycling containers that may be used.
e. Provide site - security lighting as required by the city code and in accordance with
the approved plan. The old site lights must be removed.
f. Screen all new rooftop equipment from residential neighbors as required by the
code.
g. Provide a stop sign at the exit drive onto Century Avenue.
4. If any required work is not done, -the city may allow. temporary occupancy if
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 1 V2 times the cost of the unfinished work. Any
unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in
the fall or winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or
summer.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
I. AWARD OF BIDS
None
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Housing Replacement Program Adoption
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. Community Development Director Coleman presented the staff report.
1 -22 -01 11
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the Housing Replacement Program Operations and
Procedures Plan.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
2. Tilsen South Neighborhood Streets, Project 00 -04, Accepting Report and Calling for Public
Hearing
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. Assistant City Engineer Cavett presented the staff report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution accepting the Tilsen South
Neighborhood Streets, Project 00 -04 Report and calling for the public hearin
RESOLUTION 01 -01 -011
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted November 27, 2000, a report has been
prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of the Tilsen South
Neighborhood Streets, City Project 00 -04, and this report was received by the council on January
22, 2001, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost - effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report
and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the
improvement of $1,846,000.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 12th day of
February, 2001, in the council chambers of city hall at 7 p.m. and the clerk shall give
mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
3. Edgerton Park Development Plan
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. Parks and Recreation Director Anderson presented the staff report.
1 -22 -01 12
Councilmember Koppen moved to authorize staff to enter into a formal loan agreement with the
Roseville School District in the amount of $115,000 for developing the parking lot
improvements at Edgerton Park/School complex.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
4. Building Inspector Position
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. Community Development Director Coleman presented the staff report.
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the additional Building Inspector position.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Richard Currie, 1937 Kenwood Drive, Maplewood - He said that Councilmember Wasiluk was
not at the November 27, 2000 and yet on December 11, 2000 she voted to approve the minutes of
the November 27, 2000 meeting. Councilmember Wasiluk wanted to publicly apologize if she
took a vote approving some minutes that she shouldn't have.
2. Jerry Markie, 1247 Lealand Road, Maplewood - He talked about the school district levy and the
administration letters that were in the December and January issues of the Maplewood In
Motion. He applauded the letters being in the Maplewood In Motion.
3. Kathy Juenemann, 721 Mt. Vernon Avenue East, Maplewood - She made a comment about the
city working on a park on the west side of the city.
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Compost Site - Mayor Cardinal asked that the Maplewood Compost Site Monitoring Report,
dated February 3, 1995 from the Ramsey County Department of Public Works, be included as an
attachment (Attachment 1) to the official minutes of tonight's city council meeting.
2. D.A.R.E. Graduations - Mayor Cardinal wanted to let the public know that there are three
D.A.R.E. Graduation dates scheduled as follows: Thursday, January 25th, 2:15 p.m. at Carver
Elementary; Tuesday, January 30th, 1:30 p.m. at Presentation School; and Thursday, February
15th, 6:30 p.m. at Edgerton Elementary School.
3. Energy Bills -Mayor Cardinal said that some residents had asked him if the city could do
anything about the high energy bills they've been receiving.
4. Liquor Licenses - Councilmember Koppen asked staff if the State Liquor Control Commission
was informed, in writing, of the action the city took in regard to the establishments that were not
in compliance with the Sunday on -sale liquor laws. Staff said that this has been done verbally
but they would be happy to put it in writing to the State Liquor Control Commission.
1 -22 -01 13
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None
O. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Collins moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 P.M.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
Karen E. Guilfoile, City Clerk
1 -22 -01 14
Department of Public Works
Paul L. Kirkwold, P.E., Director and County Engineer
ADMINISTRATIOM AND SURVEY
50 West Kellogg Blvd., Suite 910
St. Paul, MN 55102 • (612) 266 -2600 • Fax 266 -2615
February 6, 1995
ATTACHMENT 1 - To Minutes Map Pwood
City Council (Item M -1)
January 22, 2001
ENGINEERING /OPERATIONS
3377 N. Rice Street
Shoreview, MN 55126
612) 484 -9104 • Fax 482 -5232
Zach Hansen
Solid Waste Division
Ramsey County Public Health Dept.
1670 Beam Ave, Suite A
Maplewood, MN 55109 -- 1176
RE. Maplewood Compost Site Monitoring Report
Dear Zach:
Enclosed is a summary report, including a table of laboratory results,
related to water quality monitoring conducted at the Maplewood Compost
site in 1994. All of the data have been supplied to your office
previously. This report is intended to summarize the monitoring
effort for your use in evaluating the site
Please review the report and contact me if I can provide additional
information about the results.
Sincerely,
Terry Noonan
Project Manager -- Water Resources
The south portion of the Maplewood Compost site includes eight
compost windrows positioned in a parallel fashion, with ends oriented
n a north -south direction.
p
The east and south sides of the site are
bordered by steep upslopes. Drainage within the site is to the
northwest into a large (34.4 Ac) wetland, classified as a partially
drained /ditched palustrine emergent wetland with water regime
temporarily flooded (Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District, May
1993). The compost monitoring location is approximately 1200 Ft. from
the South Branch of County Ditch 1.8, which_.skirts-to the north.of the.
compost site through the wetland and into Kohlman Lake
A p reliminary survey of the site on June 27, 1994 identified the
compost windrow to be monitored. The windrow was 100 Ft. in length .
with a slope of 3.0 %. Ramsey County Public Works personnel began site
work on July 15, 1994. The leaf compost was removed and the ground
smoothed while maintaining the existing slope. Two pieces of 6 - mil
clear plastic, 12 Ft..X 100 Ft., were overlapped to provide a final
dimension of 15 Ft. X 100 Ft. A small earth berm was placed around
the outside edge of the plas ( except the: downstream end-) to exclude
surface runof f .`' At the. downstream end, a ...s amp 11n,g sump hole was dug
measuring 1 1 5 Ft ,. X 1 5 . Ft X 2 Ft deep Two treated : lumber" plan s
were placed on edge- and angled to direct leachate- to the sump hole. for
sampling.. A clean, plastic bucket was placed in the sump hole to
collect the leachate. The sump hole and bucket were covered by a
plywood box to exclude precipitation and dust during the monitoring
period. The compost was replaced on top of the plastic, with the
final windrow dimensions approximately 15 Ft. X 95 Ft. X 8 Ft. high.
Sampling and Laboratory Analyses
Rainfall of 0.37 In. ( reading from gage approximately 1 . 5 Mi . from
compost site) on July 20, 1994 resulted in no leachate collection- in
the sump hole. Following 0.52 In. precipitation on July 21, 1994,
sampling at 0730 on July 22, 1994 yielded 7.33 L of leachate in the
sampling bucket. No additional leachate was produced until August 10,
1994 following 1.15 In. of precipitation. The sampling sump hole
was flooded following this event, so no leachate volume could be
determined. Final sampling was done on September 2, 1994 following
0.70 In. of rainfall. The sump hole was again flooded by this event;
to a greater extent than the previous storm, due to antecedent
precipitation of 0.56 In. on August 30, 19940
Leachate sampled on July 22, 1994 was poured into sample b.ottl -es
provided by the 'Minnesota Health Dept Laboratory, - pre.served: as
required and` - delivered to the lab within 4 :h ours` o.f , sampling.
1
I _V.,e , j
Leachate for nutrient and solids analyses was retained in the Public
Works laboratory.
Leachate analyses from August 10 1994 sampl was limi to phenol
delivered to the state health'department laboratory) and nutrients,
total suspended solids, and pH. Final leachate collected on September
2 1994 was analyzed for nutrients, total suspended solids: and p.H:
specific pesticide analyses requested by Solid :Waste staff
June 20 1994 EM) included 2 -4 D, dicamba, cygon, chlorpyrifos,
diazinon, and sevin. Metal analyses to be done.included aluminum,
cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel and zinc.
Phenol, BOD 5 -day, pH, potassium, total suspended solids, total
phosphorus and nitrogen fractions were also requested.
In addition to the leachate sampling, a single water sample was taken
on July 22, 1994 from'County Ditch 18 near Highway 61.& Beam for
analyses of nutrients, pH, selected metals, potassium, BOD 5 -day and
total suspended solids. The sampling site is downstream of the
compost site.
The leachate analyses were often problematic due to the nature of the
sample. High background interferences were reported by the state
laboratory. Suspect values and large -"less, than" values were reported
in the laboratory report for many of the parameters.
Ammoni - N. and NO2 +NO3 - analyse we;r a .not . done due to. laboratory
over fight Tota "1 Kj eldahl - analysis wa compl -eted and in.clude,s. the
oranic -N 1us ammonia =N fractions. Par of these fract.l.onsg. P g
and determination o"f, Total: N, which is Total Kj eldahl -N plus
NO2 +NO3 -N, is not possible.
Results
Chronic Class 2B water quality standards, where available, are
included in the table of analytical results. The chronic standard is
the highest water concentration of a toxicant to which organisms can
be exposed indefinitely without causing chronic toxicity
MS Rules 7050.0220). Class 2B surface waters are intended to support
cool and warm water fish and associated aquatic life, and aquatic
recreation including swimming, but are not - intended, to be sources of
drinking water.
Leachate concentrations of aluminum, copper, lead, zinc, and perhaps
mercury exceeded the chronic standard for Class 2B surface waters.
The few chronic Class 2B standards given for pesticides are frequently
exceeded in the leachate sample, although this comparison is hindered
by the large "less than" values reported from the leachate analyses.
Exceptions include atrazine, alachlor, and pentachlorophenol.
Leachate pH was within the . Class 2B _chronic istandard range for al
sampI ng Aates'. Nutrient. concentrations , in the jea were
relatively constant. - Leachate °tota l. d phosphorus: wa.s 82 to
2
93% of leachate total phosphorus concentration.
Leachate water quality on July 22, 1994 differed markedly from the
water quality., of County Digit - ch, 18. Ditch nutrient` concentration °s were
r di - ltte. ,Total-". di-s-solve'd phospho was 16 % of total
hosphor conc °rat ~io in -the'' County t`ch 18 Ovate r sample`
Potas`s`. and BOD 5 -day conceptrati.ons . we. - re , ; a - 1 s'o much lowe r n t e
ditch.. sample . Le'achate total su.sper ded 'solids. concentration: wa's- -much
greater than in County Ditch 18. -and the percentage of inorganic -
solids was greater in the ditch sample relati to. -the leachate, 62%
and 50 %, respectively. County Ditch 18 lead concentration exceeded
the Class 2B chronic standard, but was less than the leachate lead
concentration.
Only a single direct estimate of leachate runoff volume was obtained
during the monitoring. Approximately 0.2% (runoff coefficient =
0.0-02) of the rain volume which fell on the windrow_ on July 20 -21 was
collected in the sampling sump hole 'A minimum runof coefficient,
005, was calculated for the August 10 and September 2 (latter
includes August 30 rain depth) precipitation events based on the
capacity of the sump bucket. These estimated runoff coefficients are
between one and two orders of magnitude smaller than expected for
runoff from general pervious surface land -uses (0.1 -0.3). An estimate
of the total leachate production for the site would include all eight
of the compost windrows. Assuming an.active compost site-covered 50%
by windrows and 50% pervious land -use with runoff coefficient of 0.2,
the composite runoff coefficient from the would be low, 0.1025.
97.5% of the expected runoff is.derived from the pervious surface
within the compost site, with 2.5% derived f rom leachate.
A small volume of leachate may significantly increase the
flow- weighted concentration of certain pollutants in runoff from the
compost site. For example, assuming no infiltration, an average total
phosphorus concentration in surface runoff from unvegetated pervious
land -use of .250 mg /L, and an average leachate total phosphorus
concentration of 15 mg /L, the expected composite total phosphorus
concentration in runoff leaving the site is .60 mg /L.
Discussion
Leachate nutrient, BOD 5 -day, and potassium concentrations were
between one and two orders of magnitude greater than those measured in
County Ditch 18. .Cadmium and. lead concentrations in the leachate
and County Ditch 18 samples were more similar. Compost is a
relatively concentrated source of certain nutrients and oxygen
demanding organic material, but not certain metals, relative to the
County Ditch 18 watershed.
The leachate monitoring yields information on the concentration of
important pollutants to be expected from water that percolates through
i.leaf compost. The impact of leachate on the surfcial groundwater,
the receiving wetland or downstream County Ditch 18 and Kohlman Lake
is related to the loading of the various pollutants. Pollutant
3
Iij t :
J , I
loadin is a function,of the volume of leachate, pollutant
concentration and pathwa losses.
i ads, s s.-edIment at*'.Pathwa ad to s'i ion,
i n f i 1 t-r-a t...;L on., bi..ol.,o, uptake, ..th e-e-,.tim.--,, of t r an h` e 6 is ance -
d.i,r,e.c'.t,l . in th:traveled4,P,a,.th, A werere-) no.t., addresse.d."
t0to.,.r. i n g .,.e,,f f o. r t Inf il.trati.6n. volume._. -..i. into the_ gground be h-e a th. " themni
I; or
0
y , plast f oalthouexcluded r.,., lewindrowuded. ,the .. 'mo n, 1 i.n,
purposes, wil -V n.0 e.r. normal , ope c itioh's_.be', li sincee: th e
volume-of leachate 'te:produced is small. The r eabilit the '.soil ls
at the compost site affects leachate infiltration rates.- The slope of
the active compost area also promotes some de of surface runoff of
leachate, mixed in with runoff generated b rain fallin on the
surface rather than on the compost windrows. The compost windrow
location is.approximatel 1200 Ft. from Count Ditch 18 throu
heavil ve we Pathwa losses throu the wetland over
this distance are probabl lar and direct ne impacts on Count
Ditch 18 b leacha generated from the
I
active compost. site are not
expected.
For the Maplewood Compost Site the greatest pathwa losses of
nutrients, ox demandin materials, metals, pesticides and
suspended solids will probabl 'occur in the adjacent wetland. A small
sediment detention basin located at the northwest corner of the site
would be useful in reducin the. potential wetland impacts associated
with pollutant..expo.rt, par. iclula,'rl solids .and-pollutants associated
with, solids, from the compost site
4
W 70'r- .91- 9 - 2"I"VISTAM 7, K-:'!r A- *P:i,-,r, n_TV.-JM.-;'4VIJ M.. MP.MV71F-T
tarJ \" h
MAPLEWOOD COMPOST SITE MONITORING
pH 7.72 (CLASS 2B CS: 6.5 -9)
TOT, SUSP. SOLIDS mg /L 39
LEACHATE SAMPLE
mg /L 14
CLASS 28 C STANDARD)
1.
PARAMETER UNITS 07/22/94 08/10/94 09 02/94 :. -:.
TOT. PHOSPHORUS mg /L 18.4 14.2 15.7
TOT. DISS. PROS,mg /L 17..2 11.7
TOT. KJELDAHL N mg /L 55.3 76.2 72.9
pH 6.73 7.74 7.46
CLASS 2B CS: 6.5 -9)
TOT. S USP. SOLIDS -mg /L 136 197 137
VOL. SUSP. SOLIDS mg /L 68 152 70
CADMIUM , TOT.u /Lg 0.74 2B CS, THARD =100: 1.1)
LEAD, TOT.ug /L 12 2B CS, THARD =100: 3.2)
POTASSIUM, TOT.mg /L 380
BOD, 5 DAY mg /L 410
COUNTY DITCH 18
HY 61 & BEAM
DOWNSTREAM OF MPLWD COMPOST SITE
WATER SAMPLE
CLASS 2B CHRONIC STANDARD)
PARAMETER
rwwwrrww .rwrw..www.w wwww.
UNITS
ww.
07/22/94
rww.rwrwwrr.ww rw+.r wrrr.nr
TOT. PHOSPHORUS mg /L 0.208
TOT, DISS. PROS,mg /L 0.033
TOT. KJELDAHL N mg /L 1.46
pH 7.72 (CLASS 2B CS: 6.5 -9)
TOT, SUSP. SOLIDS mg /L 39
VOL. SUSP. SOLIDS mg /L 14
CACADMIUM, TOT.r u g /L 0.1 (2B CS, THARD =100: 1.1)
LEAD, TOT.ug /L 5 (2B CS, THARD =100. 3o2)
POTASSIUM, TOT.mg /L 2.14
BOD, 5 DAY g
MAPLEWOOD COMPOST SITE MONITORING
3.4
ug /L
LEACHATE SAMPLE ;.
CLASS 2B CHRONIC STANDARD)
PARAMETER UNITS 07/22/94 08/10/94
ug /L
PHENOL, 4AAP ug /L 56 . (2B: . CHRONIC 123)!
INUM TOT.ALUM ,ug /L 1700 2B CS: 125)
ug /L
CADMIUM, TOT.ug /L 0.74 2B CS, THARD =100: 1.1)
ug /L
CHROMIUM, TOT.ug /L 8.3 2B CS, CR +3, THARD =100:207)
1.7 2B
2B CS, CR +6 THARD =100:11)
COP PER TOT.ug /L 13 2B CS, THARD =100: 9.8)
IRON, TOT.ug /L 2100
ug /L
MERCURY, TOT.ug /L 0.1 2B CS: .0069)
ug /L
NICKEL, TOT.ug /L 18 2B CS, THARD =-100: 158 )
ug /L
ZINC, TOT.ug /L 110 2B CS, THARD =100: 106)
ug /L
POTASSIUM, TOT.mg /L 380
ug /L
BOD, 5 DAY mg /L 410
ug /L
BASE NEUTRAL ABSTRACTION FOR SDWA PESTICIDES
LAB NOTE: SAMPLE PROBLEMATIC;HIGH BACKGROUND INTERFERENCE)
CS:
CYGON ug /L 1.7 SUSPECT D/T POOR SPIKE RECOVERY)
DIAZINON ug /L 1.7
CHLORPYRIFOS ug /L 1.7 2B CS.: 0.04.1)
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE
PROPACHLOR
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
SIMAZINE
ATRAZINE
LINDANE
METRIBUZIN
ALACHLOR
HEPTACHLOR
METOLACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
GAMMA - CHLORDANE
BUTACHLOR
ALPHA - CHLORDANE
TRANS - NONACHLOR
DIELDRIN
ENDRIN
DI(2- ETHYLHEXYL)ADIPATE
METHOXYCHLOR
DI(2- ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
BENZO (A) PYRENE
TOXAPHENE
ug /L 3.4
ug /L 1.7
ug /L 0.7 2B CS:0.00024)
ug /L 1.7
ug /L 1.7 2B CS:10 )
ug /L 0.7 2B CS:0.036)
ug /L 1.7
ug /L 1.7 2B CS:59)
ug /L 1.4 2B CS 0.00039)
ug /L 1.7
ug /L 1.7
ug /L 0.7 2B CS:0.00048)
ug /L 1.7
ug /L 1.7
ug /L 1.7
ug /L 1.7
ug /L 1.7 2B CS:0.000026)
ug /L 1.7 2B CS:0.016)
ug /L
ug /L < 1.7
ug /L < 14 ( 2B CS *e 2.1)
ug /L < 0.7
ug /L < 10 (2B CS: 0.0013)
MAPLEWOOD COMPOST SITE MONITORING
LEACHATE SAMPLE
CLASS 2B CHRONIC STANDARD)
PARAMETER UNITS 07/22/94
CHLOROPHENOXY ACID HERBICIDES
LAB NOTE: RESULTS SUSPECT DUE TO BACKGROUND INTERFERENCE)
2,4 -D ug /L 15.5
DICAMBA ug /L 5
SILVEX ug /L 7.6
ACIFLOURFEN ug /L 5
BENTAZON ug /L 15.2
DALAPON ug /L 5
2,4 -DB ug /L 5
DCPA ug /L 5
3,5 -DCBA ug /L 5
DICHLORPROP ug /L 5
DINOSEB ug /L 5
PENTACHLOROPHENOL ug /L 5 (2B CS, PH >6.95: -5.5)
PICLORAM ug /L 5
214,5 - T ug /L 5
CARBAMATES
LAB NOTE: "LESS THAN" VALUES HIGH DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCE)
SEVIN ug /L 2
ALDICARB SULFONE ug /L 20
ALDICARB SULFOXIDE ug /L 20
OXAMYL ug /L 20
METHOMYL ug /L 20
3- HYDROXYCARBOFURAN ug /L 40
ALDICARB ug /L 4
CARBOFURAN ug /L 4
n
f ,
City of Maplewood
CITY COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP
Meeting Minutes
Monday, January 22, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
6:00 p.m.
B. ROLL CALL
Mayor Robert Cardinal Present
Councilmember Sherry Allenspach Present
Councilmember Kenneth Collins Present
Councilmember Marvin Koppen Present
Councilmember Julie Wasiluk Present
Others Present:
City Manager Richard Fursman
Assistant City Manger Melinda Coleman
City Clerk Karen Guilfoile
Associate Planner Ken Roberts
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the agenda as submitted. The motion was seconded
by Councilmember Wasiluk. The motion passed 5 -0.
D. NEW BUSINESS
At this time City Manager Richard Fursman announced that the newly created position of Assistant
Community Development Director has been filled. Assistant City Manager /Community Development
Melinda Coleman introduced Tom Ekstrand to the council as the new Assistant Community
Development Director. Mr. Ekstrand previously worked in the Community Development Department as
an Associate Planner.
1. Housing Replacement Program - Associate Planner Ken Roberts presented the staff
report on this item which is on tonight's regular Council Meetin g agendaenda for council
approval. A discussion followed.
E. OTHER BUSINESS
1. National Night Out - Assistant City Manager Melinda Coleman said that the National
Night 0ut and the city Open House have been combined for the last three years. Staff
wanted to know if the council wanted to continue combining these events or would they
want two separate events as follows: 1) National Night Out on the first Tuesday in
August for neighborhood events showcasing the police department, and 2) Open House
on Saturday morning, June 2nd, on the city campus and partnering with the local schools.
The council's decision was to continue combining the National Night Out with the city
Open House as has been done in the past.
2. Civil Service Commission - City Manager Richard Fursman said that there was a vacancy
on the Civil Service Commission and asked the council how they would like to proceed
in filling this vacancy. The council directed staff to advertise for this vacancy.
3. Planning Commission and Community Design Review Board - Mayor Cardinal asked to
have pictures of the Planning Commission and Community Design Review Board
members with their names on them placed out in the foyer. Staff said the picture board is
In progress.
4. Cable Commission Discussion - The council attended this meeting and commented on
what they had learned from it.
F. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Councilmember Wasiluk moved and Councilmember
Allenspach seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:45 p.m.
AGENDA NO. G -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director Aq>-Alt
RE; APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: February 5, 2001
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and
authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
DAVAT U.
1,248.00 Checks #52930 dated 1/17/01
416,516.22 Checks #52931 thru #52995 dated 1/19 thru 1/23/01
171,775.08 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 1/17 thru 1/22/01
356.25 Checks #52996 thru #52997 dated 1/22 thru 1/24/00
124,307.39 Checks #52998 thru #53064 dated 1/30/01
89,357.71 Disbursements via debits to checking account
45,968.17
dated 1/23 thru 1/29/01
115,020.65 Checks #53065 thru #53071 dated 1/30 thru 2/1/01
90,945.27 Checks #53072 thru #53132 dated 2/6/01
1,707,606.37 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 1/30 thru 2/5/01
2,717,132.94 Total Accounts Payable
DAVDnTT.
461,610.28 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 1/19/01
34,352.00 Payroll Deduction check #82443 thru #82448 dated 1/19/01
350,444.86 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 2/2/01
45,968.17 Payroll Deduction check #82642 thru #82649 dated 2/2/01
892,375.31 Total Payroll
3,609,508.25 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me-at 770 -4513 if you have any questions on the
attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary.
hu
Attachments
R
vchlist
01/19/2001 9:55:06AM
Check Register
City of Maplewood
Page: 1
Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount
52930 1/17/01 00908 M.R.P.A.VOLLEYBALL TEAM REG - 78 TEAMS 1,248.00
52931 1/23/01 00033 ACE HARDWARE MISC MAINT SUPPLIES 131.43
52932 1/23/01 00055 AFFORDABLE ENGRAVING NAMES TAGS 232.70
52933 1/23/01 00111 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.MAPLEWOOD BOARDING FEES 244.30
MAPLEWOOD PATROL & BOARDING FEES 988.52
52934 1/23/01 01810 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD.ATTORNEY SERVICES 39.00
52935 1/23/01 00159 BARTZ, PAUL LUNCH AT TRAINING 11/06 TO 11/09 26.11
LUNCH AT TRAINING 11/20 & 11/21 11.21
LUNCH AT TRAINING 12/14 TO 12/08 30.88
LUNCH AT TRAINING 12/11 TO 12/15 38.58
LUNCH AT TRAINING 11/13 TO 11/17 26.39
LUNCH AT TRAINING 11/27 TO 12/01 33.99
LUNCH AT TRAINING 12/18 TO 12/19 13.85
52936 1/23/01 00178 BERGGREN, GORDON NAME SIGNS FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS 30.00
52937 1/23/01 00240 C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES FEES FOR SERVICE 50.00
52938 1/23/01 00395 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR FEES 1,558.00
52939 1/19/01 00415 DON'S PAINT & BODY SHOP .REPAIR ACCIDENT DAMAGE 3,406.77
52940 1/23/01 00463 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.REPAIR ENGINE 1 2,039.61
52941 1/23/01 00483 EXECUTONE SYSTEMS OF ST PAUL REPLACE POWER SUPPLY FOR VOICE MA 379.65
52942 1/23/01 00585 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.DEC 2000 SERVICE - 30 TICKETS 48.00
52943 1/23/01 00606 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT V -BELT 23.32
52944 1/23/01 00648 HESC D& A TEST 80.00
52945 1/23/01 00687 HUGO'S TREE CARE TREE TRIMMING 202.35
52946 1/23/01 00735 INTOXIMETERS MOUTHPIECES - BREATH TESTING 123.45
52947 1/23/01 00755 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY, INC.MORNING PRIDE TURNOUT COATS 31,041.25
52948 1/23/01 00789 KATH COMPANIES AUTO SUPPLIES 66.42
MIN LAMP STAT 4 2.76
AUTO SUPPLIES 29.10
52949 1/23/01 00806 KNOX LUMBER CO MAINT MATERIALS 91.25
52950 1/23/01 00867 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS PUBLIC NOTICES 12/27 89.31
52951 1/23/01 00917 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT CARBIDE BLADE 7/8X 1,517.63
52952 1/23/01 00932 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 99.75
52953 1/23/01 01819 MCLEOD USA LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE 11/16 TO 12/1 2,600.86
52954 1/23/01 01946 MEDICA FINANCE DEPT RICHARD BENSON 00009813 - REFUND INS 419.37
J MCDONALD 00011663 - REFUND 414.58
52955 1/23/01 00985 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER - FEB 2001 158,973.53
52956 1/23/01 00998 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.MERCH FOR RESALE 620.30
52957 1/23/01 01908 MINN DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION COMM ROUTER SRV & PORTS - NOV 2000 440.00
52958 1/23/01 01023 MINN. COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOC.NEW DWI FORMS 34.70
1
vchlksl
01/19/2001 9:55:06AM
Check Register
City of Maplewood
Page: 2
Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount
52959 1/23/01 01026 MINN. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION PROJ 99 -07 HAZELWOOD - MATERIALS TES 253.47
52960 1/23/01 01058 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 69.93
52961 1/23/01 01126 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 612001 PERA LIFE INS - P/R DED IN JANUARY 237.00
52962 1/23/01 01887 NORTHLAND CONCRETE & MASONARY 65 MAPLEWOOD FIRE -PYMT 3 33,250.00
52963 1/23/01 01208 OCHS BRICK COMPANY INTERSTATE MONTEREY MATTE UTILITY F 5,846.85
52964 1/23/01 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND BOB RADKE - RACQUETBALL LEA 14.00
52965 1/23/01 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND GREGORY CYLKOWSKI - RACQUE 14.00
52966 1/23/01 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND JEANNINE HENRY - WILD & WACK 15.00
52967 1/23/01 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND REBECCA LUCAS - DEP ON RM R 300.00
52968 1/23/01 01311 P.E.R.A.P/R DED REMITTANCE 1/19/01 34
52969 1/23/01 01909 PARKOS CONSTRUCTION CO FIRE STATION - PYMT 2 74,302.35
52970 1/23/01 01267 PIONEER PRESS MCC ADVERTISING 220.00
52971 1/23/01 01463 PROFESSIONAL MASSAGE CENTER MASSAGE - DEC 1 TO 31 3,398.00
52972 1/23/01 00396 PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF IDS MWA, E, F, G, I THRU T - 4TH QTR 1,920.00
MDTS SPC471 THRU SPC485 - 4TH QTR 200 1,350.00
52973 1/23/01 00396 PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF TUITION FOR TRAINING 3,150.00 ,
52974 1/23/01 01678 QWEST COIN -OP TELEPHONES 376.89
LOCAL PHONE SERVVCE- 1/1 TO 1/31/01 1
52975 1/23/01 01326 R.C.L.L.G.2001 RCLLG MEMBERSHIP DUES 1,350.00
52976 1/23/01 01850 RAWLINGS, RINDA PERMIT WORKS MTG 1/11 9.97.
52977 1/19/01 01947 RAYMOND BERGS MUSIC WORKS INC CONCERT 1/19/01 - MOTOWN REVUE 3,200.00
52978 1/23/01 01359 REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL & LUBE CAR WASHES 237.50
52979 1/23/01 01360 REINHART INSTITUTIONAL FOODS MERCH FOR RESALE 311.95
MERCH FOR RESALE 627.75
52980 1/23/01 01477 SMITH & WESSON RENTAL IDENTI KIT 408.00
52981 1/23/01 01514 ST PAUL STAMP WORKS NEW BANDS & PAD FOR DATE STAMPER 18.37
52982 1/23/01 01504 ST PAUL, CITY OF MEDICAL SUPPLIES 1,302.50
52983 1/23/01 01538 STRETCHER'S DUTY AMMO 1
52984 1/23/01 01560 SUPERIOR SERVICES DEC RECYCLING 15,561.92
52985 1/23/01 01577 TR COMPUTER SALES, INC.PERMIT WORKS - TECHNICAL SRV 150.00
52986 1/23/01 01669 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVE TOW FORFEITURE VEH 63.90
52987 1/23/01 01664 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO.REPAIR GARAGE DOOR 85.00
52988 1/23/01 01693 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE REPLENISH POSTAGE METER #17663816 3
52989 1/23/01 01690 UNITED HOSPITAL PRE -EMP PHYSICAL FOR FF 60.00
52990 1/23/01 01704 URBANSKI, HOLLY REFUND - DANCE CALSS CANCELATION 35.00
52991 1/23/01 01896 VERTICLE SYSTEMS INC ADLSLITE SOFTWARE 2
1 YEAR ANNUAL (365 DAYS) UNLIMITED 360.00
vchlist Check Register Page: 3
01119/2001 9:55:06AM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
52992 1/23/01 01734
52993 1/23/01 01750
52994 1/23/01 01755
52995 1/23/01 01876
66 Checks in this report
WALSH, WILLIAM P.COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
WATSON CO INC, THE MERCH FOR RESALE
WEBER ELECTRIC FIRE STATION - PYMT 3
WHAT WORKS INC TRAINING
Tota I the c ks :
900.00
174.93
17,480.00
900.00
417,764.22
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pa ee Description
01/16/0.1 01/17/01 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697
01/16/01 01/17/01 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149
01/12/01 01/17/01 Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items
01/17/01 01/18/01 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697
01/17/01 01/18/01 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149
01/18/01 01/19/01 MN State Treasurer,Drivers License #697
01/18/01 01/19/01 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149
01/10/01 01/19/01 MN Dept of Revenue Sales Tax
01/19/01 01/22/01 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697
01/19/01 01/22/01 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149
01/19/01 01/22/01 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax
01/10/01 01/22/01 MN Dept of Revenue Fuel Tax
TOTAL
Amount
1,003.00
9
9,737-82
743.25
9,437.50
714.25
13, 890.52
9,423.00
641.50
7,971.00
107, 903.69
728.00
171, 775.08
n
vchlist
01/26/2001 11:16:55AM
Check Register
City of Maplewood
Page: 1
Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount
52996 1/22/01 01694 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE RETURN OF MERCH 6.25
52997 1/24/01 01952 ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY PYMT FOR TRNG SEMINAR - FEB 6 & 7,200 350.00
52998 1/30/01 00018 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES CELL PHONES 246.94
52999 1/30/01 00024 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC HYDRANT HOSE & FITTINGS - STAT 3 - E3 68.60
53000 1/30/01 01908 ADMINISTRATION, DEPT OF DATA PROCESSING - DEC 2000 440.00
53001 1/30/01 00111 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.MAPLEWOOD PATROL & BOARDING FEES 632.54
53002 1/30/01 01948 ANOKA, CITY OF 2001 TUG MAILING DUES 24.00
53003 1/30/01 00159 BARTZ, PAUL POLICE OFFICER FOR 3M EVENT - PD BY 3 125.00
53004 1/30/01 00164 BAY FIREWORKS, INC.DOWNPAYMENT - FIREWORKS JULY 4, 01 5,000.00
53005 1/30/01 00166 BEARCOM REPEATER 178.28
53006 1/30/01 00198 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS MONTHLY WATER UTIL 12/6 TO 1/4 780.38
53007 1/30/01 00216 BRIGGS & MORGAN, P.A.PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,375.00
53008 1/30/01 00280 CENTRAL STORES OFFICE SUPPLIES 320.38
53009 1/30/01 00312 COMPRESSAIR & EQUIPMENT CO.REPAIR TO COMPS 226.25
53010 1/30/01 00446 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO.KODAK COPIER - NOV 2000 1,060.53
53011 1/30/01 00380 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO.REPAIR METROTECH 880B 404.70
53012 1/30/01 00406 DITCH WITCH OF MN INC REBUILD POST DRIVER & PULLER 968.81
53013 1/30/01 01601 ECONOMICS PRESS INC, THE SUBSCRIPTION - BITS & PIECES 50.09
53014 1/30/01 00447 ECOPRINT BUSINESS CARDS 90.52
53015 1/30/01 00449 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.PROJ MGMT 31.25
53016 1/30/01 00463 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.REPAIR RESCUE VEH 7 155.52
REPAIR ENGINE 4 194.40
53017 1/30/01 00464 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH, INC LABOR AND INSTALLATION EQUIP 1,096.40
REPAIR K -9 SQUAD 401.94
53018 1/30/01 00494 FAMILY SERVICE, INC.DIVE RISON /RESTITUTION SRVS - 2001 38,722.00
53019 1130/01 00513 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY 2000 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 175.00
2000 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 325.00
53020 1/30/01 01949 GARY L FISCHLER & ASSOC, P.A.PERSONNEL EVALUATION - PW DIR 450.00
PERSONNEL EVALUATION - PW DIR 450.00
PERSONNEL EVALUATION - PW DIR 450.00
53021 1/30/01 00543 GE CAPITAL KODAK COPIER LEASE - DEC 2000 528.32
53022 1/30/01 00581 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER SQD ALIGNMENT 39.00
53023 1/30/01 01928 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SRV NEW TIRES - MEDIC 2 224.28
53024 1/30/01 00589 GRAF, DAVE KARATE INSTRUCTOR - DEC 2000 180.00
KARATE INSTRUCTOR - JAN 2001 234.00
53025 1/30/01 00656 HELICOPTER FLIGHT INC.DEER SURVEY 1/10/01 350.00
53026 1/30/01 01950 HELLAND, MARION INSERVICE PRESENTATION 75.00
vhlisc t Check Register Page: 2
01/26/2001 11:16:55AM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount
53027 1/30/01 00661 HERITAGE BANK US SAVINGS BONDS 1/5 & 1/19/01 P/R DED 500.00
53028 1/30/01 00675 HOLIDAY FLEET SQD WASHES 10.36
53029 1/30/01 01083 M.D.R.A.2001 MEMBERSHIP DUES 360.00
53030 1/30/01 00898 M.F.A.P.C.2001 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 35.00
53031 1/30/01 00888 M/A ASSOCIATES FOAM SQUEEGEES 168.04
53032 1/30/01 00917 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT INC CARBIDE BLADES 1,821.15
53033 1/30/01 00925 MAJESTIC LANDSCAPE CONTR., INC LABOR TO FIX SPRINKLER CONTROLLER &240.00
53034 1/30/01 00932 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 142.50
53035 1/30/01 01951 MEDICARE REFUND M JOHNSON 00020424 - REFUND TO MEDIC 311.16
53036 1/30/01 00991 MICROFACS SERVICE /ZONE/TONER/CLUTCH 583.64
53037 1/30/01 01020 MINNEAPOLIS RAG STOCK CO.50# BOX RAGS 70.00
53038 1/30/01 01089 MINNESOTA UC FUND 4TH QTR 2000 UNEMPLOYMENT 6,704.56
53039 1/30/01 01953 MUNICI -PALS 2001 MEMBERSHIP DUES 20.00
53040 1/30101 00395 NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPT OF DNR FEES 1,881.50
53041 1/30/01 01175 NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF MONTHLY UTIL - 12/7 TO 1/8/01 1,378.53
SEWER - 1830 & 1902 CTY RD B 620.21
53042 1/30/01 01212 OLSON, ARNOLD G REIMBURSE MILEAGE 1/5 TO 1/19 58.50
PLAN REVIEWER & CODE CONSULTANT 600.00
REIMBURSE MILEAGE 12/22 TO 12/29 34.13
53043 1/30/01 01218 ON SITE SANITATION TRASH REMOVAL 57.65
TRASH REMOVAL 57.65
53044 1/30/01 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND OH ANDERSON SCHOOL - GROUP 25.20
53045 1/30/01 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND DAVID FRANKE - ACH 35.00
53046 1/30/01 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND KATE FINCEL - GYMNASTICS 38.00
53047 1/30/01 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND JULIE ANN WOLLENBERG - YOUT 38.00
53048 1/30/01 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND DAWN REINSBERG -BD PARTY 45.00
53049 1/30/01 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND LOIS MCHUGH - MASSAGES 102.24
53050 1/30/01 01679 QWEST DEX MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY CTR DIRECTOR 99.00
53051 1/30/01 01337 RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV TRAFFIC TAG BOOKS 1
DATA PROCESSING SERVICES - DEC 2000 905.20
POSTAL VERIFICATION CARDS 274.08
2000 RADIO SERVICE - 4TH QTR 45,904.86
53052 1/30/01 01338 RAMSEY COUNTY -VITAL STATISTICS NOTARY PUBL COMM - J WEGWERTH 25.00
53053 1130/01 01458 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND 2 NAME SIGNS 71.18
53054 1/30/01 01468 SLABA, JACLEE PAINTING - EDGERTON GYM 100.00
53055 1/30/01 01572 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.PRINTER SUPPLIES 477.48
PRINTER SUPPLIES 424.40
53056 1/30/01 01573 SZCZEPANSKI, TOM LODGING - JOI CONVENTION 320.87
53057 1/30/01 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC WINTER MIX 10.65
6-
vchlist Check Register Page: 3
01/26/2001 11:16:55AM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
53058 1/30/01 01592 TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
53059 1/30/01 01595 TESSMAN SEED CO. - ST. PAUL
53060 1/30/01 01669 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT &
53061 1/30/01 01711 VECTOR INTERNET SERVICES INC
53062 1/30/01 01728 VOYAGEUR ASSET MGMT, LLC
53063 1/30/01 01734 WALSH, WILLIAM P.
53064 1/30/01 01876 WHAT WORKS INC
69 Checks in this report
Description /Account
PHONE SUPPORT - DEC 2000
24" PUSHER
TOW FORFEITURE VEH
TOW FORFEITURE VEH
WEB SPACE /DOMAIN HOSTING 1/19 - 2/19
INV MGMT FEE 1/1 T03/31/01
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
DISC COMM ASSESSMENTS
Total checks
Amou
26.00
187.23
63.90
63.90
24.00
806.00
220.00
132.00
124, 663.64
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to .Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pa ee
01/22/01
01/22/01
01/19/01
01/19/01
01/23/01
01/23/01
01/19/01
01/24/01
01/24/01
01/25/01
01/25/01
01/1
01 /26/01
01/26/01
01/23/01
01/23/01.
01/23/01
01/23/01
01/24/01
01/24/01
01/24/01
01/25/01
01/25/01
01/26/01
01/26/01
01/26/01
01/29/01
01/29/01
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN .State Treasurer
CBSA
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
Elan Financial Services
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
WI Dept of Revenue
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
TOTAL
Description
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
State Payroll Tax
Dental claims
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
Purchasing card items
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
State Payroll Tax
Drivers License #697
Deputy Registrar #149
Amount
796.00
8
18,258.80
2,863.70
759.00
8
19,098.68
668.25
9
618.75
6
1,196.93
512.75
10,963.97
89,357.71
0110
vchlist
02/02/2001
V
12:28:52PM
Check Register
City of Maplewood
Page: 1
Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount
53065 1/30/01 01954 KAYSER FORD 2000 FORD CROWN VICTORIA SQUAD CAR 40,998.00
53066 2/1/01 00276 CORPORATE BENEFIT SERVICES MONTHLY ADMIN FEE - FEB 2001 521.30
53067 2/1/01 00529 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO.MONTHLY PREMIUM DUE - FEB 2001 2,454.76
53068 2/1/01 00644 HEALTHPARTNERS MONTHLY PREM DUE - FEB 2001 32,169.16
53069 2/1/01 00966 MEDICA CHOICE MONTHLY PREMIUM - FEB 2001 36,062.78
53070 2/1/01 01085 MN LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY PREM - FEB 2001 2
53071 2/1/01 00283 CENTURY COLLEGE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER CARDS 21.00
53072 2/6/01 01048 3M BLK FILM #1178 441.68
53073 2/6/01 00018 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES MONTHLY CELLULAR 110.70
MONTHLY CELLULAR 14.63
53074 2/6/01 00033 ACE HARDWARE MISC. SUPPLIES - NOV 2000 287.80
MISC SUPPLIES - DEC 2000 201.65
53075 2/6/01 00055 AFFORDABLE ENGRAVING NAME TAGS W /CLUTCH BACKS 20.24
53076 2/6/01 00114 ANOKA HENNEPIN TECH COLLEGE BOOK FOR EMT CLASS 87.57
53077 2/6/01 00014 AT & T 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHARGES 7.52
53078 2/6/01 00021 AWD COOLERS WATER SERVICE 319.02
53079 2/6/01 00174 BELDE, STAN K -9 HANDLER - FEB 2001 35.00
53080 2/6/01 01957 BELL YELLOW PAGES YELLOW PAGES AD FOR MCC - 2001 183.00
53081 2/6/01 00178 BERGGREN, GORDON NAME SIGNS FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS 30.00
53082 2/6/01 01811 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC MERCH FOR RESALE 241.20
MERCH FOR RESALE 80.40
53083 2/6/01 00349 CUB FOODS - MAPLEWOOD EAST REFRESHMENTS - DARE 14.55
53084 2/6/01 00370 DAKOTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE TRI -CTY LAW ENFORCEMENT - 2001 DUES 60.00
53085 2/6/01 00367 DP INDUSTRIAL MARKETING 50 - 60" LOCKBARS 956.89
53086 2/6/01 01943 DUNN, SALLY UNIFORM - CLOTHES 150.22
53087 2/6/01 00483 EXECUTONE SYSTEMS OF ST PAUL TELEPHONE INSTALLS & REPAIRS 1,438.41
53088 2/6/01 00499 FAUST, DANIEL GFOA CONF - AIRFARE & HOTEL DEPOSIT 624.00
53089 2/6/01 01955 HASSUMANI, NURI MCC STAFF WORKSHOP 1/21/01 500.00
53090 2/6/01 00668 HIEBERT, STEVEN K -9 HANDLER - FEB 2001 35.00
53091 2/6/01 01916 INSITUFORM TECH USA INC PROJ 00 -08 - CURED IN PLACE PIPE 9,514.70
53092 2/6/01 01605 INSTITUTE FOR FORENSIC, THE CSO CANDIDATE PSYCH EXAM 350.00
53093 2/6/01 00778 KBS COMPUTER SERVICES TYPEWRITER RIBBON 172.21
53094 2/6/01 00828 L.M.C.I.T.ZERWAS CLAIM 2
53095 2/6/01 00843 LANDSCAPE ALTERNATIVES FLOWERS 49.94
53096 2/6/01 00857 LEAGUE OF MINN. CITIES 2001 MEMBERSHIP - MN MAYORS ASSN 20.00
LEGISLATIVE CONF 2001 - R CARDINAL 70.00
LEADERSHIP SEMINAR - K COLLINS 150.00
vchlist Check Register Page: 2
02/02/2001 12:28:52PM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount
53097 2/6/01 00908 M.R.P.A.2001 MEMBERSHIP FEES 1,459.00
53098 2/6/01 00932 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 114.00
MERCH FOR RESALE 429.37
53099 2/6/01 00964 MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB, INC.CABLE 3LD PATIENT RA 6 FT 178.00
HOSE WITH ADAPTER 31.00
53100 2/6/01 00998 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.MERCH FOR RESALE 173.20
MERCH FOR RESALE 179.85
MERCH FOR RESALE 543.95
53101 2/6/01 01117 MUNICILITE CO.BRAID HYDRAULIC HOSES /DAYCO FITTING 629.48
53102 2/6/01 01115 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMM.2001 ANNUAL DUES 8,945.00
53103 2/6/01 01127 N.E.S.A.YTH BASKETBALL REFS & SCOREKEEPER 981.25
53104 2/6/01 00395 NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPT OF DNR FEES 1,290.00
53105 2/6/01 01174 NORTH ST PAUL- MAPLEWOOD-MEMBERSHIP DUES 175.00
53106 2/6/01 01187 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO.FLEXOV CHOPSAW EHL/GOODYEAR P WA 109.64
53107 2/6/01 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REFUND STACY TRAPP - CPR 15.00
53108 2/6/01 01229 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, INC.SOAPSTONE /GOGGLES /ACETYLENE 61.53
53109 2/6/01 01311 P.E.R.A.P/R DEDUCTION REMITTANCE - 2/2/01 35,872.11
53110 2/6/01 01284 POSTMASTER POSTAGE - MAPLEWOOD .IN MOTION 5,000.00
53111 2/6/01 01742 PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT REG FOR TRNG - CUDE & DOLLERSCHELL 20.00
53112 2/6/01 01353 RAY O'HERRON CO INC CHEMICAL SPRAY 79.31
CHEMICAL SPRAY - RESERVES & INVESTM 68.45
53113 2/6/01 01360 REINHART FOODSERVICE MERCH FOR RESALE 213.57
53114 2/6/01 01956 RIVER COUNTY RESOURCE CONS CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE 40.00
53115 2/6/01 01387 ROSSINI, DR. JAMES FITNESS PROGRAM FEES 100.00
53116 2/6/01 01389 ROSSMAN, DAVID MEALS 1/25 & 1/26 23.83
53117 2/6/01 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT MERCH FOR RESALE 343.29
MERCH FOR RESALE 47.33
CANDY /SNACKS 27.80
MERCH FOR RESALE 106.54
MERCH FOR RESALE 17.20
CAN DY /SNACKS 113.96
VENDING MACHINE - POP 500.40
53118 216/01 01461 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO SERVICE AGREEMENT THRU 11/30/01 2,288.15
53119 2/6/01 01556 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC FUEL 107.13
53120 2/6/01 01514 ST PAUL STAMP WORKS INC DOG & CAT LICENSE TAGS /SPLIT RINGS 182.84
53121 2/6/01 01537 STREAMLINE DESIGN INC.TSHIRTS - SR HIGH BASKETBALL 997.00
53122 2/6/01 01538 STREICHER'S SQUAD EQUIP INSTALL 2,074.73
SQUAD EQUIP INSTALL 903.60
53123 2/6/01 01564 SUZANNE'S CUISINE, INC.FOOD /BEV FOR PW CANDIDATES REC 1/9 249.11
WEDDING FAIR 500.00
vchlist Check Register Page: 3
02/02/2001 12:28:52PM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
53124 2/6/01 01026 TRANSPORTATION, DEPT OF
53125 2/6/01 01644 TREADWAY GRAPHICS
53126 2/6/01 01580 TS E, INC.
53127 2/6/01 01670 U -CARE MINNESOTA
53128 2/6/01 01683 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
53129 2/6/01 01709 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL
53130 2/6/01 01721 VIRTUE PRINTING
53131 2/6/01 01750 WATSON CO INC, THE
53132 2/6/01 01793 XEROX CORPORATION
68 Ch ec ks i n thi s re port
Description /Account
MATERIAL TESTING & INSPECTIONS
LAB TEST RATE
BALLOONS /MICROFIL BALLOONS - DARE
JANITORIAL SERVICES 10/19 TO 11/15
JANITORIAL SRVS 11/16 TO 12/13
ARTHUR LIDBERG 00019627 - REFUND
TURTLENECK
PANT
PANTS
SH -I RTS /GLOVES
SHOES /SHIRT /PANTSBELT /LAMP MODULE
SOCS /OLYMPIC GTX
BOOTS /KNIFE /OLYMPIC GTX
PANTS
NAVY OUTERSHELL FOR ABA
SWEATER
NAME TAGS
MERCH FOR RESALE
PW TRASH REMOVAL - FEB 2001
CH TRASH REMOVAL - FEB 2001
MCC TRASH REMOVAL - FEB 2001
DOG & CAT LICENSE FORMS
FINAL INSPECTION BLUE CARDS
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
XEROX CHARGES - DEC 2000
Total checks
Amou
I?JU.Ur
135.92
278.44
669.00
623.34
377.86
31.00
44.06
49.46
98.87
475.62
203.27
297.36
40.95
67.50
108.86
17.23
152.85
731.65
501.31
1 ,133.72
565.60
60.39
170.09
134.12
261.00
205,965.92
11
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pa Description Amount
01/29/01 01/30/01 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 1
01/29/01 01/30/01 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 6
01/26/01 01/30/01 CBSA Dental claims 2
01/30/01 01/31/01 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 809.00
01/30/0 1 01/31/01 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 9
01/26/01 01/31/01 Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items 19,313.41
01/31/01 02/01/01 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 498.00
01/31/01 02/01/01 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 4
02/01/01 02/01/01 Firstar Bank Debt Service 1
02/01/01 02/02/01 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 612.50
02/01/01 02102/01 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 6,411.50
02/02/01 02/05/01 MN State Treasurer Drivers License #697 575.00
02/02/01 02/05/01 MN State Treasurer Deputy Registrar #149 11,378.50
02/02/01 02/05/01 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 74,136.37
TOTAL 1, 707, 606.37
12
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 ALLENSPACH , SHERRY 3 5 0.81
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 ALDRI DGE , MARK 2407091
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 BOHL, JOHN C 2172.49
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 FLOR,TIMOTHY 1952.92
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 FRASER,JOHN 2159998
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 TAUBMAN,DOUGLAS J 3151.80
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT PALMA, STEVEN 2397.19
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 JOHNSON, KEVIN 2104.27
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA A 2059.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 CROTTY , KERRY 2 0 6 7.4 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 HASSENSTAB ,DENISE R 125,75
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 HI EBERT , STEVEN 2313,27
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 DUNN ALICE 2328. 19
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 CORNER AMY L 97.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 CHRISTENSEN,CHARLES M 2015.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/.01 BELDE,STANLEY 2274.84
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 RENSLOW , RITA 197,93
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 BAKKE , LONN A 2173979
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 BOWMAN ,RICK A 2026,43
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 KOPPEN , MARVIN 3 5 0.81
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 PIKE , GARY K 1802,75
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 HEINZ,STEPHEN J 2026.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 HEMQUIST,MICHAEL R 2230.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 SKRYPEK , JOSHUA L 6 8 4.5 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 HERBERT ,MICHAEL J 2026,43
13
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT'PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 STOCKTON, DERRELL T 2026,43
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 ROS SMAN , DAVID A 2184,88
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 HALWEG KEVIN R 2581.61
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 OLSON,JULIE S 1424.30
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 BREHEIM, ROGER W 1631.17
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 LARSON,DANIEL J 1523.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 THI ENES , PAUL 2 5 3 0.4 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 AN ZALD I , MANDY 954,47
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 POWELL ,PHILIP 1698.26
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 S Z C Z EPANSKI , THOMAS J 2263.53
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 WEN Z EL , JAY B 1523,23
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 DOBLAR RICHARD N 1477.69
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 COLLINS KENNETH V 350,81
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 CAMPBELL, CRAIG D 1337,63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J 243.93
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 ERICKSON,KYLE F 534.09
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 WEAVER, KRI STINE A 841,14
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 HAWKINS ,LISA A 79,40
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 McGUIRE, MICHAEL A 197.48
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/0,OSTER , ANDREA J 1508,03
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 URBANSKI HOLLY S 1438.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 ANDERSON,CAROLE J 1978.24
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 JACKSON, MARY L 1485.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 TETZLAFF , JUDY A 13 4 0.8 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 CASAREZ , GINA 1328,83
14
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 CARLE , JEANETTE E 14 2 0. 6 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 JAGOE , CAROL 13 9 5.2 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 OLSON , SANDRA 942-13
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 CORCORAN THERESA M 12 0 1.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 MARTINSON CAROL F 1395..23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 EVERSON,PAUL 2099912
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 PARSONS,KURT G 1739.15
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 SPANGLER,EDNA E 613.44
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 ZWI EG ,SUSAN C,2101.38
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 DeBILZAN, THOMAS C 1511,82
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 EDGE , DOUGLAS 1615.01
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 LUTZ , DAVID P 17 5 9.9 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 MEYER, GERALD W 1635,23
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 NAGEL , BRYAN 1751,90
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 OSWALD , ERI CK D 1768,54
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 DUCHARME,JOHN 1872.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 PECK,DENNIS L 1978.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 PRI EBE , WILLIAM 1907923
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 DOHERTY , KATHLEEN M 1563, 11
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 15 61.6 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 GREW - HAYMAN , JANET M 1259923
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 HORSNELL, JUDITH A 7 6 3 . 3 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 NELSON,JEAN 973.91
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 GAYNOR,VIRGINIA A 1456.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 LIVINGSTON , JOYCE L 7 8 6.2 9
15
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT.
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 THOMPSON , DEBRA J 5 2 4 . 2 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 EKSTRAND , THOMAS G 2 0 6 0.2 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 ROBERTS,KENNETH 2022.93
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1961.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 KELLY,LISA 1149.42
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 NORDQUIST,RICHARD 1810.81
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 OT I S , MARY ELLEN M 6 2 2 . 6 2
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 CHRISTENSEN, JODIE D 796.58
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 COLEMAN ,PHILIP 337.02
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 FARR, DIANE M 375,11
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 HORWATH , RONALD J 599,90
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 LARSON , DEBRA 395.27
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 MOORS VANESSA J 443,23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 SEEGER,GERALD F 418.59
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 STEINHORST,JEFFREY 553.84
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 SWANSON,LYLE 1614.21
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 FLUG, MEGAN L 259,63
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01 WATC ZAK , LAURA 1936.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 MORNING , TIMOTHY L 1410.25
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 S CHULT Z ,SCOTT M 1568,15
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 REILLY,MICHAEL R 1199.72
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 YOUNG,DILLON J 665.90
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 ATKINS,KATHERINE 85.25
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 RAWLINGS , RINDA M 115 8.4 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 FLUG , ELAINE R 43,94
16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 MCCLUNG , HEATHER A 351,37
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 DARST , JAMES M 15 6 2 .0 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 S INDT , ANDREA J 1072.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 WORWA,LINDSAY M 47.48
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 JUNG,STEPHANIE J 1643.81
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 PALM,ROXANN L 1149.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 FRY , PATRI C IA 1480.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 CARLSON , THERESE 17 5 4 .3 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 LE , SHERYL 3141,92
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01 / 19 / 01 FAUST ,DANIEL F 3403.12
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 BADMAN , GAYLE L 2305,89
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 KELSEY , CONNI E L 1491,70
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 GUILFOILE , KAREN E 213 9.2 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 WINGER, DONALD S 3403,80
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 ANDREWS,SCOTT A 2510.58
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 BANICK,JOHN J 3956.30
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 KARI S , FLINT D 2355,23
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 KVAM ,DAVID 2479,83
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 RABBETT , KEVIN 2 311.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 STEFFEN , SCOTT L 3948,32
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 THOMALLA DAVID J 3956,30
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 BERGERON JOS PE H A 2357.54
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 GERVAIS- JR,CLARENCE N 1980.89
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 CALLAHAN , COLLEEN J 1745,23
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 LUKIN , STEVEN J 25 79994
17
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD.
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECrT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 SVENDSEN, RUSTIN L 2060,00
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 PRI EFER, WILLIAM 2 8 7 9.6 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 KANE MI CHAEL R 2168.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 LUNDSTEN,LANCE 2470.69
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M 2557.70
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 ANDERSON,BRUCE 3059.51
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 MARUSKA , MARK A 3233 . 63
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 HUTCHINSON , ANN E 1780,03
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 COLEMAN , MELINDA 3219.80
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 GRAF , MI CHAEL 1272.83
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 ROBBINS , AUDRA L 1272,83
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 CROSSON, LINDA 1691.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 EASTMAN,THOMAS E 2130.86
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 STAPLES,PAULINE 2400.31
DIRECT DEPOSIT
01/19/01 SCHLINGMAN,PAUL 1826.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 HURLEY , STEPHEN 2247,05
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 JOHNSON ,BONNIE 761,06
DIRECT DEPOSIT 01/19/01 BERGO , CHAD M 1624.24
82144 01/19/01 CARDINAL,ROBERT J.398.62
82145 01/19/01 WASILUK,JULIE A 350.81
82146 01 / 19 / 01 FURSMAN , RI CHARD F 3873,08
82147 01/19/01 ZICK,LINDA 345.00
82148 01/19/01 INGVOLDSTAD,CURTI J 106.25
82149 01/19/01 CUDE,LARRY J 391.71
82150 01/19/01 EDSON,KAREN L 376.00
19
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82151 01/19/01 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE 2422.30
82152 01/19/01 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1446.43
82153 01/19/01 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1634.55
82154 01/19/01 PALANK,MARY KAY 1395923
82155 01/19/01 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1395.23
82156 01/19/01 RYAN,MICHAEL 4359989
82157 01/19/01 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1606.19
82158 01/19/01 BARTZ,PAUL 1972.41
82159 01/19/01 BUSACK,DANIEL P 1652.89
82160 01/19/01 KONG,TOMMY T 1511.94
82161 01/19/01 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 2070.24
82162 01/19/01 MEEHAN,JAMES 2456.97
82163 01/19/01 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 2514.79
82164 01/19/01 ACOSTA,MARK J 576.00
82165 01/19/01 AMBORN,JASON H 996900
82166 01/19/01 ANDERSON,BOBBIE J 824.00
82167 01/19/01 ANDERSON,BRIAN 648.00
82168 01/19/01 AUBIN,DENNIS J 1332.00
82169 01/19/01 BAHL,DAVID C 1860.00
82170 01/19/01 BALAZS,JOSEPH M 1236.00
82171 01/19/01 BAUMAN,ANDREW C 3580.00
82172 01/19/01 BECK,PATRICK L 2092.00
82173 01/19/01 BOE,ERICK W 744.00
82174 01/19/01 BOLLES,THOMAS A 1164900
82175 01/19/01 BOURQUIN G 984.00
19
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82176 01/19/01 BRAATEN,HAROLD A 982900
82177 01/19/01 BUCHE,JOETTE 2087000
82178 01/19/01 CAHILL,CHRISTOPHER S 1347.00
82179 01/19/01 CORCORAN,JENNIFER L 732.00
82180 01/19/01 CROMETT,MARK F 1467.00
82181 01/19/01 DALY,FRANK 1272.00
82182 01/19/01 DAWSON,RICHARD P 1069.00
82183 01/19/01 DIETZ, EDWARD W 552.00
82184 01/19/01 DITTEL,MICHAEL A 1642.00
82185 01/19/01 DOREE,KURT A 1130.00
82186 01/19/01 DUELLMAN,AMY L 1056.00
82187 01/19/01 DUELLMAN,JOSEPH W 720.00
82188 01/19/01 DUELLMAN,KIRK T 930.00
82189 01/19/01 EVERSON,.PAUL E 1041.00
82190 01/19/01 FASULO,WALTER R 1042.00
82191 01/19/01 FETTERS,JEFFREY L 1897.00
82192 01/19/01 FITZGERALD,EDWARD P 672.00
82193 01/19/01 GERARD,JAMIE P 2737.00
82194 01/19/01 GERVAIS- JR,CLARENCE N 1896.00
82195 01/19/01 GRILL,CARL 972.00
82196 01/19/01 HAKSETH,NATHAN I 1821.00
82197 01/19/01 HALE,JOSEPH E 736.00
82198 01/19/01 HAMLIN,ANDREW G 835.00
82199 01/19/01 HASKINS,KEVIN J 744.00
82200 01/19/01 HEFFERNAN,PATRICK E 2296.00
20
21
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82201 01/19/01 HERLUND,RICK R 1818.00
82202 01/19/01 HJELLE,ERIK DAVID 576.00
82203 01/19/01 HOHN,JAMES M 1505.00
82204 01/19/01 JOHNSON,DOUGLAS R 1480.00
82205 01/19/01 KARNOWSKI,SANDRA J 1640.00
82206 01/19/01 KNABE,WILLIAM H 1086.00
82207 01/19/01 KOEHN,CORY M 3827.00
82208 01/19/01 KOLASA,MARK A 944.00
82209 01/19/01 KONDER,RONALD W 2938.00
82210 01/19/01 KORTUS,WILLIAM J 950900
82211 01/19/01 LIALLIER,TED C 1084.00
82212 01/19/01 LEDMAN,KEVIN 2648.00
82213 01/19/01 LIDBERG,MICHAEL A 1111000
82214 01/19/01 LINN,BRYAN D 460.00
82215 01/19/01 LOVE,NICOLE J 537900
82216 01/19/01 LUCERO,ROGER E 664.00
82217 01/19/01 MALLORY,GORDON E 1314.00
82218 01/19/01 MARTY,MARK K 2852.00
82219 01/19/01 MARX,ERIC D 584.00
82220 01/19/01 MELANDER,JON A 2541.00
82221 01/19/01 MELANDER,SCOTT A 1866.00
82222 01/19/01 MELLEN,RICHARD T 784.00
82223 01/19/01 MEYERS,PAUL E 1078.00
82224 01/19/01 MILLER,NICHOLAS J 1068.00
82225 01/19/01 MONK,JOHN J 994.00
21
22
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82226 01/19/01 MONROY,JON J 4050.00
82227 01/19/01 MCGOVERN,JOHN L 1074.00
82228 01/19/01 NADEAU,AARON R 256.00
82229 01/19/01 NALIPINSKI,STEPHEN M 1997.00
82230 01/19/01 NEUMAN,BRIAN A 748.00
82231 01/19/01 NOLAN,PAUL W 1080000
82232 01/19/01 NOVAK,JEROME R 811.00
82233 01/19/01 OLSON,KENNETH A 828.00
82234 01/19/01 PETERSON,MARK S 1030.00
82235 01/19/01 PETERSON,RICHARD A 600.00
82236 01/19/01 PETERSON,ROBERT H 1004.00
82237 01/19/01 PETERSON,THEODORE E 1158.00
82238 01/19/01 PIERCE,SCOTT G 742.00
82239.01/19/01 PILLAR,MICHAEL R 60.00
82240 01/19/01 POOLE,CHRISTOPHER C 368.00
82241 01/19/01 RICKETSON,BRENT L 938.00
82242 01/19/01 ROMANIK,JAMES A 734.00
82243 01/19/01 RONDEAU,WILLIAM R 216.00
82244 01/19/01 SACKETT,JAMES T 1248.00
82245 01/19/01 SCHADT,JEFFREY A 2388.00
82246 01/19/01 SCHOENECKER,THOMAS R 1068.00
82247 01/19/01 SCHULTZ,THOMAS E 907.00
82248 01/19/01 SEDLACEK,JEFFREY D 1161.00
82249 01/19/01 SEVERSON,DAVID A 1736.00
82250 01/19/01 SHANLEY,ROBERT J 192.00
22
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82251 01/19/01 SIEDOW,ERIC R 360.00
82252 01/19/01 SIKORA,PAUL T 72000
82253 01/19/01 SINGER, SCOTT W 564.00
82254 01/19/01 SKOK,STEPHEN L 1.078.00
82255 01/19/01 SMITH,KEITH A 1199000
82256 01/19/01 SMITH,RICHARD J 826.00
82257 01/19/01 STANWAY,ROBERT A 552.00
82258 01/19/01 SVENDSEN,RON 1326.00
82259 01/19/01 TESSMER,TODD D 548.00
82260 01/19/01 TREPANIER,EUGENE 1490.00
82261 01/19/01 TRONNES,JOHN E 372.00
82262 01/19/01 UBEL,JEFFREY J 784.00
82263 01/19/01 WALZ,JAMES G 1547.00
82264 01/19/01 WATERS,JOSEPH D 2038.00
82265 01/19/01 WELDON,ROBERT W 816.00
82266 01/19/01 WHISLER,MICHAEL D 1189.00
82267 01/19/01 WHITE,JOEL A 768.00
82268 01/19/01 WILSON,JASON M 4730.00
82269 01/19/01 ZASTROW,GREGG P 1429.00
82270 01/19/01 ZIMMERMANN HOHN,ANN K 2032.00
82271 01/19/01 DARST,ROBERTA L 257.25
82272 01/19/01 SCHWAB,TAHIRAH H 101050
82273 01/19/01 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1564.03
82274 01/19/01 NIVEN,AMY S 552.16
82275 01/19/01 FREBERG,RONALD L 1823.94
23
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82276 01/19/01 JONES,DONALD R 1413996
82277 01/19/01 ELIAS,JAMES G 1978.43
82278 01/19/01 EMMS,MELISSA K 392.40
82279 01/19/01 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 1872.03
82280 01/19/01 EDSON,DAVID B 1897948
82281 01/19/01 HELEY,ROLAND B 1835.11
82282 01/19/01 HINNENKAMP,GARY 1608.53
82283 01/19/01 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 888.26
82284 01/19/01 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 1561.63
82285 01/19/01 NOVAK,MICHAEL J 1373.23
82286 01/19/01 BERGREN,KIRSTEN A 22.50
82287 01/19/01 SOUTTER,CHRISTINE 143.00
82288 01/19/01 WORDEN,KRISTEN L 49.50
82289 01/19/01 HANSEN,LORI L 909.26
82290 01/19/01 ANDERSON,EVERETT 796.72
82291 01/19/01 OSTROM,MARJORIE 2493.63
82292 01/19/01 WENGER,ROBERT J 1992.83
82293 01/19/01 ADAMS,CAILIN M 32.25
82294 01/19/01 ANGLES,JERI L 80.00
82295 01/19/01 BALLESTRAZZE,THAD M 88.00
82296 01/19/01 BENDER,JAYME L 21.75
82297 01/19/01 BJORK,BRANDON R 144.75
82298 01/19/01 BUCZKOWSKI,ALAN 60.00
82299 01/19/01 DRAGOS,AMANDA M 20.25
82300 01/19/01 FINN,GREGORY S 1608.63
24
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82301 01/19/01 FITCH,CHRISTOPHER 50.50
82302 01/19/01 FRANK,LAURA 280.50
82303 01/19/01 GEBHARD,JILLIAN R 199.38
82304 01/19/01 GLASS,ROBERT P 45.00
82305 01/19/01 GORE,MICHAEL A 40.00
82306 01/19/01 HORNER,JAY B 33.00
82307 01/19/01 JONDAHL,ERIN E 27.00
82308 01/19/01 KAREL,BRADLEY M 32.25
82309 01/19/01 KAREL,.JULIE E 33900
82310 01/19/01 KELLY,BRYAN PAUL 90.00
82311 01/19/01 KINNING,KATIE M 40.00
82312 01/19/01 KLEM,JOSH H 72.00
82313 01/19/01 LUSHANKO,ADAM 44.00
82314 01/19/01 MARTINUCCI,ERIN R 21.00
82315 01/19/01 MICK,JONATHAN 41.00
82316 01/19/01 McBRIDE,PATRICK D 72.00
82317 01/19/01 McCABE,MATTHEW L 30.75
82318 01/19/01 NIEMCZYK,ANTHONY R 33.00
82319 01/19/01 NIEMCZYK,BRIAN N 72.00
82320 01/19/01 O'SHEA,COLETTE T 28.00
82321 01/19/01 OHLHAUSER,MEGHAN M 195.75
82322 01/19/01 POLASKI,PATRICK R 323.19
82323 01/19/01 ROERING,JORDAN T 30.75
82324 01/19/01 SANDHOLM,DAN R 30.00
82325 01/19/01 SCHNOBRICH,LAURIE K 84.00
25
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82326 01/19/01 SHOBERG,KARI A 263.75
82327 01/19/01 SIKORA,PAUL T 95900
82328 01/19/01 TARR- JR,GUS L 42.00
82329 01/19/01 THOMPSON,BRYAN J 52.50
82330 01/19/01 UNGAR,KRISTOPHER 44.00
82331 01/19/01 VANDERBOSCH,BLAKE R 44.00
82332 01/19/01 VERHULST,RYAN H 147.00
82333 01/19/01 WALSH,JESSICA M 19.50
82334 01/19/01 WERNER,KATIE M 117.50
82335 01/19/01 WILLIAMS,ERICA L 26.00
82336 01/19/01 GERMAIN,DAVID 1652.85
82337 01/19/01 HAAG,MARK W 1152.83
82338 01/19/01 NADEAU,EDWARD A 3233.63
82339 01/19/01 GLASS,JEAN 849.62
82340 01/19/01 HOIUM,SHEILA 854.72
82341 01/19/01 KARAS,TAMARA A 250.92
82342 01/19/01 PARTLOW,JOSHUA J 197.20
82343 01/19/01 POWERS,NICOLE L 236.08
82344 01/19/01 RIDLEHOOVER,KATE I 176945
82345 01/19/01 SALZBRENNER,HEIDI T 35.50
82346 01/19/01 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 1251.23
82347 01/19/01 SHOBERG,CARY J 551.12
82348 01/19/01 SMITH,AMY L 185.06
82349 01/19/01 ABRAHAMSON,REBECCA L.102.44
82350 01/19/01 ANDERSON,TIMOTHY R 93950
26
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82351 01/19/01 BACHMAN,NICOLE T 69.88
82352 01/19/01 BITTNER,KATIE C 295.13
82353 01/19/01 BODZIAK,MICHAEL D 157900
82364 01/19/01 CARLSON,JULIE ANN 40.00
82365 01/19/01 CHAPMAN,JENNY A 199.11
82366 01/19 CMIEL,NICHOLAS S 36930
82367 01/19/01 COSTA,JOSEPH P 126.00
82368 01/19/01 DEMPSEY,BETH M 62.05
82369 01/19/01 DeGRAW,KRYSTAL M 344.93
82370 01/19/01 ERICKSON,CAROL A 63.45
82371 01/19/01 FONTAINE,ANTHONY 54.90
82372 01/19/01 GORAL,TERESA A 36.00
82373 01/19/01 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 218935
82374 01/19/01 HAFNER,THOMAS J 34.38
82375 01/19/01 HAGGERTY,KATHRYN A 75.60
82376 01/19/01 HAGSTROM,LINDSEY S 96.19
82377 01/19/01 HAWKE,ASHLEY RYAN 544.13
82378 01/19/01 HEINN,REBECCA L 373.90
82379 01/19/01 HILLS,CHRISTINE M 133.25
82380 01/19/01 HOLMGREN,LEAH M 102.60
82381 01/19/01 HOULE,DENISE L 116.10
82382 01/19/01 IRISH,KARL D 86.13
82383 01/19/01 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 144.63
82384 01/19/01 JOHNSON,ROLLAND H 44.53
82385 01/19/01 JOVONOVICH,TODD R 108.28
27
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82386 01/19/01 KAHLER,BRADLEY G 58.50
82.387 01/19/01 KERSCHNER,JOLENE M 127.00
82388 01/19/01 KOEHNEN,MARY B 854.72
82389 01/19/01 KROLL,MARK 78.20
82390 01/19/01 MEVERDEN,LAURA J 29.48
82391 01/19/01 MILLS,ANNE K 66.63
82392 01/19/01 MOSSONG,ANDREA M 129.01
82393 01/19/01 MOTZ,ERIN M 66.98
82394 01/19/01 McMAHON,MELISSA E 42.25
82395 01/19/01 OIE,GINA M 65.50
82396 01/19/01 OLSON,ABIGAIL E 162.38
82397 01/19/01 OWEN,JONATHAN 117.65
82398 01/19/01 PEHOSKI,JOEL T 71.28
82399 01/19/01 POWERS,JESSICA 24948
82400 01/19/01 REGESTER, DOUG 21925
82401 01/19/01 SEXTON,ALAYA LANI 20.00
82402 01/19/01 SISTERMAN,ANNA V 106.40
82403 01/19/01 SMITLEY,SHARON L 179.10
82404 01/19/01 SWANER,JESSICA 219.35
82405 01/19/01 VIERS,MARY A 261.77
82406 01/19/01 WARNER,CAROLYN 59.70
82407 01/19/01 WEDES,CARYL H 97.50
82408 01/19/01 WELTER,ELIZABETH M 213.90
82409 01/19/01 WHITE,NICOLE B 55.25
82410 01/19/01 WILLIAMS,KELLY M 1032.39
29
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82411 01/19/01 WOODMAN,ALICE E 306.15
82412 01/19/01 ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L 31.50
82413 01/19/01 BOSLEY,CAROL 145955
82414 01/19/01 FLEMING,KATHY A 243.75
82415 01/19/01 FLEMING, LAURA C 97.50
82416 01/19/01 GLASS,GILLIAN 33.00
82417 01/19/01 GROPPOLI,LINDA M 175.00
82418 01 / 19 / 01 HAN S EN , ANNA K 182,58
82419 01/19/01 HUPPERT,ERICA L 40.95
82420 01/19/01 KONECZNY,JENNA M 48.00
82421 01/19/01 LARKIN,JENNIFER L 18.00
82422 01/19/01 MANNING,KENNETH.R 108975
82423 01/19/01 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 327985
82424 01/19/01 TARNOWSKI,MICHAEL'37.95
82425 01/19/01 BEHAN,JAMES 1304.03
82426 01/19/01 CHAPEAU,GREG M 625.74
82427 01/19/01 DOUGLASS,TOM 195.30
82428 01/19/01 JAHN,DAVID J 1328.83
82429 01/19/01 KOSKI,JOHN F 1027.88
82430 01/19/01 KYRK,ASHLEY 37980
82431 01/19/01 LANGEVIN,KRISTINA A 78.00
82432 01/19/01 LESLIE,DUSTIN G 102.00
82433 01/19/01 LONETTI,JAMES F 733.38
82434 01/19/01 MATTESON,FRANK M 231.35
82435 01/19/01 MORIN,TROY J 136900
29
CHECK NUMBER
82436
82437
82438
82439
82440
82441
82442
CHECK DATE
01/19/01
01/19/01
01/19/01
01/19/01
01/19/01
01/19/01
01/19/01
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
PATTERSON,ALBERT 658.50
PRINS,KELLY M 211.52
ROSEBEAR,CRYSTAL J 138.00
SEVERSON,HOLLY A 72.00
AI CHELE ,CRAIG J 13 8 8.8 3
MULVANEY,DENNIS M 1727.23
PRIEM, STEVEN A.1583.23
461610.28
30
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EA REPORT
FOR THE CUR PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT D . EPOSIT 02/02/01 BECKER I RONALD D 1170o00
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 ALLENSPACH 350e81
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 MARALDRIDGE 2129*67
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 BOHL C 2311*84
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 FLOR 2178*91
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 FRASER 2273*.60
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 TAUBMANDOUGLAS J 3357,80
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 PALMA,STEVEN 2422*56
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 JOHNSON 2645*41
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 ERICKSON A 2059*23
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 CROTTY,DERRY 2455e58
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 HASSENSTABIDENISE R 56*30
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 HIEBERT I STEVEN 2521905
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 DUNN 2570*77
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 CORNERAMY L 126*10
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 BELDE I STANLEY 2422985
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 RENSLOW 289.28
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 BAKKE,LONN A 2247*80
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 BOWMAN ,RICK A 2026*43
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 KOPPEN MARVIN 350e81
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 PIKE GARY K 2105o15
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 HEINZ J 2063*69
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 SKRYPEK L 558*00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 HERBERT J 2026*43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 STOCKTON T 2249999
31
t
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 RO S SMAN ,DAVID A 2 7 5 7.3 7
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 HALWEG , KEVIN R 2 9 3 3.3 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT 0202/01 MARUSKA ERICAr 8 9.9 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 OLSON,JULIE S 1523.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 BREHEIM,ROGER W 1573.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 LARSON,DANIEL J 1648.44
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 THIENES,PAUL 2558.08
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT J 02/02/01 AN ZALD I , MANDY 10 0 4.0 0
f
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 POWELL,PHILIP 1698926
DIRECT DEPOSIT -02/02/01 S Z C Z EPANSKI , THOMAS J 2301,63
3
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 WEN Z EL , JAY B 1523923
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 DOBLAR , RICHARD N 15 2 6.0 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT 0202/01 COLLINS KENNETH Vr 3 5 0.81
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 CAMPBELL r CRAIG D 13 3 7.6 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J 243993
DIRECT DEPOSIT V
02/02/01 ERICKSON,KYLE F 669.73
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 WEAVER,KRISTINE A 904.72
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 HAWKINS ,LISA A 112913
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 KOEHNEN , AMY 7 6.0 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 McGUIRE ,MICHAEL A 19 7.4 8
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 OSTER r ANDREA J 1508903
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 URBANSKI,HOLLY S 1438943
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 ANDERSON,CAROLE J 19840'71
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 JACKSON,MARY L 1485.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 TETZLAFF , JUDY A 13 4 0.8 3
32
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 CASAREZ , GINA
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 CARLE , JEANETTE E
DIRECT DEPOSIT
S
1'
02/02/01 JAGOE ,CAROL
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 OLSON,SANDRA
DIRECT DEPOSIT s 02/02/01 CORCO:AN, THERESA M
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 MARTINSON,CAROL F
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 EVERSON,PAUL
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 PARSONS,KURT G
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 SPANGLER,EDNA E
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 ZWIEG,SUSAN Co
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/Q2/01 DeBILZAN, THOMAS C
DIRECT DEPOSIT 0 2 / 0 2 / 01 EDGE , DOUGLAS
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 LUT Z ,DAVID P
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 MEYER, GERALD W
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 GEL BRYANNA ,
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 OSWALD D
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 DUCHARME,JOHN
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 PECK , DENNI S L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 PRI EBE , WILLIAM
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 DOHERTY , KATHLEEN M
DIRECT DEPOSIT r 02/02/01 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
DIRECT DEPOSIT 0 2 0102/ /GREW— HAYMAN , JANET M
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 HORSNELL,JUDITH A
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 NELSON, JEAN
DIRECT DEPOSIT -
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 GAYNOR,VIRGINIA A
AMOUNT
1151.51
1395.23
1395.23
1416.73
1201.63
2154.59
2490.84
1967.38
725.46
1480.03
1668.59
1993.13
3001.86
3127.56
2009.28
2940.26
1872.03
1978.43
1907.23
1508.03
1561°63
928.66
1259.22
999.34
1456.03
33
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE —GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT'PAY..PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 LIVINGSTON , JOYCE L 786929
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 THOMP SON , DEBRA J 52 4.2 4
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 EKSTRAND THOMAS G 2 4 3 5.4 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 ROBERTS,KENNETH 1951.23
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1961.63
i
DIRECT DEPOSIT l
02/02/01 KELLY,LISA 1149.43
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 NORDQUIST,RICHARD 1666955
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
s
02/02/01 OTIS,MARY ELLEN M 649.15
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 CHRISTENSEN, JODIE D 914.42
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 COLEMAN ,PHILIP 5 3 9.8 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 FARR, DIANE M 3 81.31 .
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 HORWATH RONALD J 569992
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 LARSON , DEBRA 411.31
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 MOORE VANESSA J 2 3 9.9 5
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 SEEGER,GERALD F 412956
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 STEINHORST,JEFFREY 553984
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 SWANSON,LYLE 2313.24
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 FLUG , MEGAN L 182913
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 WATC ZAK , LAURA 2087,69
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 MORNING , TIMOTHY L 13 9 9.7 6
DIRECT DEPOSIT z 02/02/01 S CHULT Z SCOTT M 15 0 2.3 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 REILLY,MICHAEL R 1150.41
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 YOUNG,DILLON J 675.26
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 ATKINS,KATHERINE 185907
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 RAWLINGS , RINDA M 115 8.4 3
34
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 FLUG R
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 McCLUNG,HEATHER A
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/0.1 DARST,JAMES M
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 SINDT,ANDREA J
DIRECT DEPOSIT i
02/.02/01 WORWA.LINDSAY M
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 JUNG,STE,PHANIE J
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 PALM,ROXANN L
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 FRY ,PATRICIA
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 CARLSON.THERESE
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 LE,SHERYL
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 FAUST ,DANIEL F
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 BAUMAN,GAYLE L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 KELSEY ,CONNIE L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 GUI LFOILE,KAREN E
DIRECT . DEPOSIT
02/02/01 WINGER, DONALD S
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 ANDREWS,S.COTT A
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 BANICK,JOHN J
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 KARIS,FLINT D
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 KVAM,DAVID
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 RABBtTT,KEVIN
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 STEFFEN,SCOTT L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 THOMALLA,DAVID J
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 BERGERON,JOSEPH A
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 GERVAIS—JR,CLARENCE N
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 CALLAHAN,COLLEEN J
AMOUNT
37*00
318e96
1845.68
1072*03
127.29
1657.90
1038,59
1480.
1754
3306.05
3528*12
2305.89
1496*61
2264*24
3403*80
2831*79
2663*50
2507.22
2598*22
2708*32
2922*07
4053*26
4204.59
1-980e89
1870e23
35
w -r
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 LUKIN , STEVEN J
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 SVENDSEN, RUSTIN .L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 1
1 02/02/01 PRI EFER, WI LLIAM
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 KANE MICHAEL R
DIRECT DEPOSIT 1 02/02/01 LUNDSTEN,LANCE
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 CAVETT,CHRISTOPHER M
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 ANDERSON,BRUCE
DIRECT DEPOSIT ;
02/02/01 MARUSKA,MARK A
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 HUTCHINSON,ANN E
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 COLEMAN , MELINDA
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 GRAF ,MICHAEL
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 ROBBINS , AUDRA L
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 CROSSON LINDA
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 EASTMAN,THOMAS E
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 STAPLES,PAULINE
DIRECT DEPOSIT
02/02/01 SCHLINGMAN,PAUL
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 HURLEY , STEPHEN
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 JOHNSON , BONNI E
DIRECT DEPOSIT 02/02/01 BERGO , CHAD M
82451 02/02/01 CARDINAL,ROBERT J.
82452 02/02/01 WASILUK,JULIE A
82453 02/02/01 FURSMAN,RICHARD F
82454 02/02/01 INGVOLDSTAD,CURTIS J
82455 02/02/01 CUDE,LARRY J
82456 02/02/01 MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE
AMOUNT
2579.94
2060.00
3016.92
3366.73
2470.69
2557.70
3234.51
3446.59
1780.03
3394.80
1272.83
1272.83
1691.23
2130.86
3798.55
1826.43
2247.05
779.75
1624.24
398.62
350.81
4323.08
100.00
391.71
2580.62
36
37
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82457 02/02/01 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1446.43
82458 02/02/01 VIETOR,LORRAINE S 1589.21
82459 02/02/01 PALANK,MARY KAY 1395.23
82460 02/02/01 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1585907
82461 02/02/01 RYAN,MICHAEL 4644.85
82462 02/02/01 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 2616.53
82463 02/02/01 BARTZ,PAUL 1936983
82464 02/02/01 BUSACK,DANIEL P 1680.72
82465 02/02/01 KONG,TOMMY T 1682.36
82466 02/02/01 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 1996.83
82467 02/02/01 MEEHAN,JAMES 2431.23
82468 02/02/01 SHORTREED,MICHAEL P 2940.98
82469 02/02/01 DARST,ROBERTA L 283950
82470 02/02/01 SCHWAB,TAHIRAH H 110.25
82471 02/02/01 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1564.03
82472 02/02/01 NIVEN,AMY S 572.89
82473 02/02/01 FREBERG,RONALD L 2095.50
82474 02/02/01 JONES,DONALD R 1668.59
82475 02/02/01 ELIAS,JAMES G 1978943
82476 02/02/01 EMMS,MELISSA K 98.10
82477 02/02/01 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 2738.03
82478 02/02/01 EDSON,DAVID B 2406.45
82479 02/02/01 HELEY,ROLAND B 1852.20
82480 02/02/01 HINNENKAMP,GARY 1788.26
82481 02/02/01 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 249.12
37
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE.CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
w w Ir w
I
82482
w w w
02/02/01
w w w w w . ..............
LINDORFF,DENNIS P 1561.63
82483 02/02/01 NOVAK,MICHAEL J 1199.23
82484 02/02/01 BERGREN,KIRSTEN A 15.75
82485 02/02/01 SOUTTER,CHRISTINE 107.25
82486 02/02/01 HANSEN,LORI L 838926
82487 02/02/01 ANDER80N,EVERETT 514.34
82488 02/02/01 OSTROM,MARJORIE 2639.36
i 82489 02/02/01 WENGER,ROBERT J 2647.29
82490 02/02/01 ADAMS,CAILIN M 75.25
82491 02/02/01 ANGLES,JERI L 200.00
82492 02/02/01 BENDER,JAYME L 43.50
82493 02/02/01 BENNETT,HEIDI 274.00
82494 02/02/01 BJORK,BRANDON R 180.00
8`2495 02/02/01 BROWN,BRUCE A 132.00
82496 02/02/01 BUCZKOWSKI,ALAN 72.00
82497 02/02/01 DAVISON,LINCOLN R 793.50
82498 02/02/01 DRESSEN,EMILY L 28.00
82499 02/02/01 FINN,GREGORY S 1856943
82500 02/02/01 FITCH,CHRISTOPHER A 41.00
82501 02/02/01 FRANK,LAURA 334913
82502 02/02/01 GEBHARD,JILLIAN R 391.50
82503 02/02/01 GLASS,DANIEL M 70.00
82504 02/02/01 GORE,MICHAEL A 60.00
82505 02/02/01 HARGROVE,AYAN T 21.50
82506 02/02/01 HAWKES,BRYAN L 66.00
qoel
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82507 02/02/01 HOLDER,RYAN M 143900
82508 02/02/01 HORNER,JAY B 11000
82509 02/02/01 JAWORSKI,ERIC K 32.50
82510 02/02/01 JONDAHL,ERIN E 19.50
82511 02/02/01 KAREL,BRADLEY M 51.00
82512 02/02/01 KAREL,JULIE E 66.00
82513 02/02/01 KLEM,JOSH H 109.50
82514 02/02/01 LANDE,JOSEPH R.28.00
82515 02/02/01 LANDE,MICHAEL 54.00
82516 02/02/01 LUSHANKO,ADAM 33.00
82517 02/02/01 MARTINUCCI,ERIN R 49.00
82518 02/02/01 MICK,JONATHAN 61.50
82519 02/02/01 MICK,KYLE J 30900
82520 02/02/01 McBRIDE,PATRICK D 108900
82521 02/02/01 McCABE,MATTHEW L 27.00
82522 02/02/01 NIEMCZYK,ANTHONY R 66.00
82523 02/02/01 NIEMCZYK,BRIAN N 126.75
82524 02/02/01 O'SHEA,COLETTE T 42.00
82525 02/02/01 OHLHAUSER,MEGHAN M 216.00
82526 02/02/01 POLASKI,PATRICK R 362.50
82527 02/02/01 RASMUSSEN,DAVID M 40.00
82528 02/02/01 ROERING,JORDAN T 30.75
82529 02/02/01 SATTER,BONNIE K 19.50
82530 02/02/01 SCHOEN,DEREK W 35.00
82531 02/02/01 SHOBERG,KARI A 279.13
39
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82532 02/02/01 SPENCER,WILLIAM 56025
8253.3 02/02/01 TARR- JR,GUS L 100000
82534 02/02/01 THOMAS,RUSSELL 42.00
82,535 02/02/01 UNGAR,KRISTOPHER 44.00
82536 02/02/01 VANDERBOSCH,BLAKE R 77.00
82537 02/02/01 VAUGHAN,PATRICK J 694.00
82538 02 / 0 2 / 01 VERHULST , RYAN H 147.00
82539 02/02/01 WALSH,JESSICA M 19.50
82540 02/02/01 WERNER,KATIE M 128.75
82541 02/02/01 WILLIAMS,ERICA L 19.50
82542 02/02/01 ZIELINSKI,JOSEPH R 49.00
82543 02/02/01 GERMAIN,DAVID 1599.55
82544 02/02/01 HAAG,MARK W 1384.27
82545 02/02/01 NADEAU,EDWARD A 3526.45
82546 02/02/01 GLASS,JEAN 863.29
82547 02/02/01 HOIUM,SHEILA 854.72
82548 02/02/01 KARAS,TAMARA A 57.73
82549 02/02/01 MOFFAT,ETHAN J 127.50
82550 02/02/01 PARTLOW,JOSHUA J 306.00
82551 02/02/01 POWERS,NICOLE L 220.10
82552 02/02/01 RIDLEHOOVER,KATE I 353957
82553 02/02/01 SALZBRENNER,HEIDI T 49.70
82554 02/02/01 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 1251.23
82555 02/02/01 SHOBERG,CARY J 639.68
82556 02/02/01 SMITH,AMY L 259.09
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82557 02/02/01 ANDERSON,TIMOTHY R 119.00
82558 02/02/01 BACHMAN,NICOLE T 66.63
82559 02/02/01 BITTNER,KATIE C 667.38
82560 0.2/02/01 BODZIAK,MICHAEL D 221.00
82561 02/02/01 CARLSON,JULIE ANN 56.00
82562 02/02/01 CHAPMAN,JENNY A 403.55
82563 02/02/01 CMIEL,NICHOLAS S 47.85
82564 02/02/01 COSTA,JOSEPH P 223.00
82565 02/02/01 DEMPSEY,BETH M 100.10
82`566 02/02/01 DeGRAW,KRYSTAL M 398928
82567 02/02/01 ERICKSON,CAROL A 102.90
82568 02/02/01 FONTAINE,ANTHONY 45.00
82569 02/02/01 GORAL,TERESA A 34900
82570 02/02/01 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 312.38
82571 02/02/01 HAFNER,THOMAS J 54.69
82572 02/02/01 HAGGERTY,KATHRYN A 132930
82573 02/02/01 HAWKE,ASHLEY RYAN 606.48
82574 02/02/01 HEINN,REBECCA L 473.30
82575 02/02/01 HENLY,SAMUEL E 8.13
82576 02/02/01 HILLS,CHRISTINE M 141.38
82577 02/02/01 HOLMGREN,LEAH M 339.52
82578 02/02/01 HOULE,DENISE L 173.50
82579 02/02/01 IRISH,KARL D 89.38
82580 02/02/01 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 207.91
82581 02/02/01 JOHNSON,ROLLAND H 53.09
41
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
82582 02/02/01 JOHNSON,SUSAN M
82583 02/02/01 JOVONOVICH,TODD R
82584 02/.02/01 KERSCHNER,BRANDON R
82,585 02/02/01 KERSCHNER,JOLENE M
82586 02/02/01 KOEHNEN,MARY B
82587 02/02/01 KROLL,MARK J
82588 02/02/01 MILLS,ANNE K
82589 02/02/01 MOSSONG,ANDREA M
82590 02/02/01 McMAHON,MELISSA E
82591 02/02/01 OIE,GINA M
82592 02/02/01 OLSON,ABIGAIL E
82593 02/02/01 OWEN,JONATHAN
82594 02/02/01 PEHOSKI,JOEL T
82595 02/02/01 REGESTER, DOUG
82596 02/02/01 SCHAEFER,ROB J
82597 02/02/01 SISTERMAN,ANNA V
82598 02/02/01 SMITLEY,SHARON L
82599 02/02/01 SWANER,JESSICA
82600 02/02/01 VIERS,MARY A
82601 02/02/01 WARNER. CAROLYN
82602 02/02/01 WEDES,CARYL H
82603 02/02/01 WELTER,ELIZABETH M
82604 02/02/01 WELTER,KRISTINE M
82605 02/02/01 WHITE,NICOLE B
82606 02/02/01 WHITE,TIMOTHY M
AMOUNT
40.50
60.35
60.13
115.25
645.95
102.00
47.13
41.88
30.88
127.73
150.26
130.06
94.50
61.00
8.13
129.60
276.05
161.95
346.52
119.30
136.00
315.65
121.88
156.38
35.63
42
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82607 02/02/01 WILLIAMS,KELLY M 632.29
82608 02/02/01 WOODMAN,ALICE E 369.15
82609 02/02/01 ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L 134.53
82610 02/02/01 BOSLEY,CAROL 180.40
82611 02/02/01 FLEMING,KATHY A 276.25
82612 02/02/01 GLASS,GILLIAN 114.58
82613 02/02/01 GROPPOLI,LINDA M 236925
82614 02/02/01 HANSEN,ANNA K 152.43
82615 02/02/01 HANSEN,EMILY J 51.00
82,616 02/02/01 HUPPERT,ERICA L 81.90
82617 02/02/01 KONECZNY,JENNA M 126.00
82618 02/02/01 LARKIN,JENNIFER L 151.50
82619 02/02/01 RADKE,ANN M 106.50
82620 02/02/01 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 319.55
82621 02/02/01 TARNOWSKI,MICHAEL 74.25
82622 02/02/01 TRAPP,STACY M 198.00
82623 02/02/01 BEHAN,JAMES 1493.75
82 -624 02/02/01 CHAPEAU,GREG M 686.58
82625 02/02/01 DOUGLASS,TOM 239.40
82626 02/02/01 JAHN,DAVID J 1328.83
82627 02/02/01 KOSKI,JOHN F 1150.73
82628 02/02/01 KYRK,ASHLEY 50.40
82629 02/02/01 LANGEVIN,KRISTINA A 186.00
82630 02/02/01 LESLIE,DUSTIN G 153.00
82631 02/02/01 LONETTI,JAMES F 803.58
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
82632 02/02/01 MAINA,FRANK 66.00
82633 02/02/01 MATTESON,FRANK M 198930
82634 02/02/01 MORIN,TROY J 162.00
82635 02/02/01 PATTERSON,ALBERT 752.10
82636 02/02/01 PRINS,KELLY M 204.91
82637 02/02/01 ROSEBEARCRYSTAL J 144.00
82638 02/02/01 SEVERSON,HOLLY A 84.00
82639 02/02/01 AICHELE,CRAIG J 1388.83
82640 02/02/01 MULVANEY,DENNIS M 1727.23
82641 02/02/01 PRIEM, STEVEN A.1583.23
350444.86
MIA
Agenda No. C7 aw A
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: January 31, 2001
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
FROM: Sherrie Le
Human Resource Director
SUBJECT: Annual Leave
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
I have attached the proposed description of a new benefit entitled .Annual Leave.
This benefit is being proposed to replace vacation and sick leave. This was developed
through the labor negotiations process with AFSCME, LELS Local 153 (Police
Officers) and the Metro Supervisory Association. We also met with the non -union
employees and explained it to them.
We have successfully negotiated this new benefit in each of the three contracts that
expired 12- 31 -00. It will be optional for current employees hired before May 5, 2001
and mandatory for all new hires in these three groups after this date. We want to
offer this new program to regular non -union employees under the same conditions.
This new benefit will help to resolves the discrepancies between severance pay
provisions of the various groups. These discrepancies have caused a lot of difficulties
in negotiations and with employee morale in general. We will propose this benefit to
the Sergeants union when their contract expires (unless they request it earlier).
We anticipate some increased cost to the City initially and a decrease in cost over the
years as employees leave who are eligible for the sick leave as severance. We feel the
increased cost now is worth it to resolve the employee morale issues.
RECOMMENDATION
Please recommend approval of this new benefit to the City Council with the
understanding that it will be applicable to all regular non -union employees and all
employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement that has incorporated annual
leave.
City of Maplewood Annual Leave Plan
Introduction
It is the objective of the City of Maplewood to provide consistency and flexibility in the delivery
of paid time off benefit alternatives to City staff. The traditional paid vacation, sick leave, and
personal holidays have been in place for many years. These programs are highly structured with
extensive rules applied to their use. These rules may not provide the best "fit" for the
circumstances of individual employees and their immediate and extended families.
These rules often interject the employer into the personal lives of employees and require
supervisors to make subjective judgments. A good example is who qualifies as "immediate"
family when an employee needs to provide care for someone in their household who is
incapacitated. In addition, the definition of "too sick to work" is extremely subjective and it is
impossible to hold everyone to the same standard.
The Annual Leave Plan replaces individual vacation and sick leave plans and combines them into
a single benefit program. Employees would accrue annual leave based on length of service with
the City. This means that employees all receive the same amount of paid time off, regardless of
their personal or family situation. Plan provisions discourage unnecessary utilization by
providing cash and savings incentives.
With the adoption of this plan, the City firmly accepts and endorses the principles of consistency,
flexibility, personal responsibility, and the recognition of years of service.
Polic
It is the policy of the City of Maplewood to provide paid time away from work to eligible
employees. This policy is implemented by means of the Annual Leave Program, which covers
all paid leave previously available under the City's vacation and sick leave benefits. The Annual
Leave program does not include designated or personal holidays, funeral leave, military leave or
court leave.
Any sick leave or vacation time that an employee may have used under the Family and Medical
Leave or Parenting Leave policies will become annual leave. The legal requirements of the time
off and continuation of insurance contributions under those laws remain unchanged. (This means
the City will contribute the same amounts toward health and dental insurance premiums while
employees are on family and medical leave as they would have prior to annual leave.)
Annual Leave can be used for any reason, subject only to necessary request and approval
procedures consistent with policy and labor contracts. As with all paid time off programs, we
need to ensure that service to the public and work requirements are not adversely impacted.
Med *cal Certification
Good attendance is an essential job function for all City employees. If unplanned absences are
excessive, a doctor's certificate may still be required. It shall state the nature and duration of the
illness or injury and verify that the employee is unable to perform the duties and responsibilities
of their position. A statement attesting to the employee's ability to return to work and perform
the essential functions of the job and a description of any work restrictions may also be required
before the employee returns to work. (If an unplanned absence is not viewed as a problem by the
employee's supervisor, a doctor's statement will not be required.)
Accrual Rates
Years of Service
1 - 4 Years
5 - 11 Years
12 - 20 Years
After 20 Years
Annual Accrual Rates
19 days
24 days
29 days
34 days
Annual Leave shall not accrue during unpaid leaves. Regular part-time employees shall accrue
annual leave on a pro -rated basis based on regular hours worked.
Annual leave will accrue on apay- period basis (as vacation and sick leave do) for up to 62 days.
Employees can carry over up to their full balance as long as the total balance never exceeds the
62 day cap. No additional accrual will occur above the cap.
Annual Leave shall be provided to employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement as it
is negotiated into contracts. Employees hired prior to May 5, 2001 who are covered by a
collective bargaining agreement that contains annual leave, shall have the option to remain in the
sick leave and vacation plans.
They also have the option to convert to annual leave during one of two open window periods.
The first open window period will be a 60 day period shortly after City Council approval of the
labor agreement incorporating annual leave. The second open window period will be the month
of September, 2001 during our regular open enrollment period for benefits. Employees hired
after the agreement is ratified by both parties will automatically be provided annual leave if they
are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that has incorporated annual leave. Non -union
employees hired prior to May 5, 2001 will have the option to convert to annual leave during two
similar open enrollment periods - which will likely coincide with open enrollment periods set up
for other employees. Those hired after May -5 -01 will automatically be provided annual leave.
Current Sick Leave Balances - Deferred Sick Leave
Employees hired prior to May 5, 2001 who have accrued sick leave and who elect to participate
in the annual leave program will retain their current sick leave balance to be used as "deferred
sick leave" until the balance is exhausted. Deferred sick leave can be used for any doctor
certified extended leave that would have been covered under the previous sick leave policy in
effect December 31, 2000. An extended leave for purposes of this policy is defined as one
requiring an employee to be out of work for more than three consecutive days.
If an employee knows they will be out for more than three consecutive days before the absence,
they will be eligible to use the deferred sick leave bank from the first day. For example, if an
employee has a scheduled surgery where they know - in advance - they will be out for two weeks,
the employee will be able to use hours from their deferred sick leave bank starting on the first
day of the absence. If an employee is out and expects to return within three days, they will use
annual leave. If the medical condition extends beyond the three days, the deferred sick leave
bank will be applied retroactively and any annual leave used will be restored to the annual leave
balance.
Once the deferred sick leave bank is exhausted, employees will use annual leave for all absences
covered by the annual leave program - up to the point that disability insurance coverage goes into
effect. Any deferred sick leave balance remaining when an employee leaves City service will
expire unless the employee would have been eligible for sick leave as severance pay prior to
electing annual leave. (See Severance Pay below.)
Current Vacation Balances
Unused vacation balances shall be converted to annual leave on a one - for -one basis.
Banked Personal Holidav Hours
Employees who have banked personal holiday hours that were earned and unused prior to March,
1984 will have the option to cash them out at their current hourly rate during the open window
period or to retain them.
Short Term Disability Insurance
The City will adopt an optional short term disability insurance program effective October 1,
2001. The cost of this coverage will be paid by the employee, if the employee elects coverage.
For employees who elect this coverage, the benefits will begin after an employee is out for 30
calendar days.
The City already has a long term disability program in place where benefits begin at 90 calendar
days. Short term disability benefits will therefore cover the period from 30 calendar days to 90
calendar days. Employees may use sick leave hours from the deferred sick leave bank to make
up the difference between pay provided by short- and long -term disability insurance payments
and their regular take -home pay.
Severance Pay
Under the current vacation and sick leave programs, employees are eligible for 100% of their
vacation and personal holiday balance when they leave City employment. Some employees are
also eligible for 50% of their sick leave balance when they leave. Eligibility for sick leave as
severance varies by group with different maximum payouts depending on the group. For some
groups there are different severance pay benefits dependent upon an employee's start date.
When a current employee elects annual leave, their eligibility for severance pay will change
somewhat. If the employee would have been eligible for sick leave as severance prior to electing
annual leave, they will retain their eligibility (using the remaining deferred sick leave balance)
under the same conditions as were in place before they elected annual leave.
For example, if an employee was eligible for 50% of their sick leave balance - up to a cap of 50
days - prior to electing annual leave, they will be eligible for 50% of their deferred sick leave
balance up to 50 days when they leave City service.
New employees, and current employees who elect annual leave, will be eligible for 100% of their
annual leave balance when they leave City service. They may receive this as cash or deferred
compensation (subject to IRS regulations).
Unpaid Leave
Unpaid leaves may be approved in accordance with the City Personnel Policies. Employees must
normally use all accrued annual leave prior to taking an unpaid leave. If the leave qualifies under
parenting leave or family and medical leave, the employee may retain a balance of 40 hours when
going on an unpaid leave. Any exceptions to this policy must be approved by the City Manager.
Sick Leave Conversion
There are various sick leave conversion programs in existence which cover different employee
groups. Some programs vary within a particular group based on hire date. Employees who opt
into annual leave will be able to convert annual leave to cash or deferred compensation as
described below. Employees who do not elect annual leave may continue to convert sick leave
and/or vacation based on programs in effect in December 2000.
Annual Leave Conversion
Annual leave will be eligible for conversion to cash or deferred compensation on a one - for -one
basis (subject to IRS maximum deferral regulations) annually subject to the following conditions.
Up to 40% of the annual leave balance, not to exceed 80 hours, may be converted each year
provided the employee has used a minimum of 30% of their annual accrual during the current
calendar year and has a minimum balance of at least 176 hours. The minimum balance
requirement will be determined as of the first payroll in December and will be based on the
employee's current hourly rate on December 1.
Conversion to cash or deferred compensation will occur in the second payroll of the following
year with specific dates to be determined by the Finance Department each year. Finance will
notify all employees who are accruing annual leave in November of each year as to the dates and
conversion options. The conversion will be part of regular payroll and will not be paid in a
separate check. Regular rate for the purpose of this policy is the employee's straight time rate
not including overtime, pay differentials, out -of -class adjustments or any other additions to
regular pay.
January 9, 2001
Agenda No. 6
AGENDA REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
January 31, 2001
Richard Fursman
City Manager
Sherrie Le
Human Resource Director
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
l "ed
Rejected
SUBJECT: Proposed Settlement - A.F.S.C.M.E. Clerical/Technical &Maintenance
I have attached the proposed two -year negotiated labor agreement between the City
and A.F.S.C.M.E. Local 2725. It has been ratified by their membership.
I have included the Bureau of Mediation Services Uniform Settlement Document.
By Law, this must be presented to the City Council with the proposed settlement.
Approval of this settlement is recommended. If you have any questions, please let me
know.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
A.F.S.C.M.E. Local 2725
Clerical/Technical/Maintenance
TENTATIVE CONTRACT SETTLEMENT
2001 & 2002
1. Duration Two year agreement to expire December 31, 2002.
2. Wag General wage increase of 3% for 2001 retroactive to
1 -1 -01. General wage increase of 3.75% effective 1 -1 -02.
Salary Ranges will be replaced with new eight step salary range.
Current employees will be moved into the new pay ranges at a step equal
to their current pay rate (or if no equal step exists in the new system, they
will move to the next highest step) on their anniversary date. If they were
due an increase in pay during the contract period, they will be moved to
the closest step in the new ranges that would not result in a loss of pay due
to adopting the new ranges. Employees will be gradually moved into the
new salary ranges based on their anniversary dates. New employees hired
between 1 -1 -01 and 12 -31 -01 in the Building Custodian class will be
placed into the 2000 ranges adjusted by 3% until 1 -1 -02. They will
move to step 1 of the 2002 ranges on 1 -1 -02.
Employees will be eligible for a step increase once peryear up to the
maximum pay. This will occur on their anniversary date if their
performance is fully satisfactory on their performance evaluation.
Employees whose performance is less than fully satisfactory will not receive
a step increase until they have received two consecutive performance
evaluations that are fully satisfactory.
In addition, twelve job classes were adjusted to bring them in line
with the 75th percentile of the market.
3. &ecognition Two new job classes were added and one was restructured and
retitled. New classes are: Clerk and Utility Maintenance Trainee.
Facility Technician Campus was changed to Lead Custodian.
4. Work Sched. We added a new 7.7 which allows flexible job assignments on a
temporary basis without the City being obligated to pay `out -of- class"
pay. These assignments are intended to be used to provide
variety or growth and development to the employee and must be
agreed to by the employee, union representative and department
head and approved by the Human Resource Director. We also
clarified that out -of -class pay applies to situations where
employees work out -of -class for "4 hours or more". (It previously
stated I/z of a shift and we have many shift lengths now.)
5. Stands We established standby pay for weekdays at the rate of 1 hour of
straight time. We had existing language that covered weekends
and holidays. For Utility Maintenance staff, the straight -time and
overtime rate for standby will be based on Step 8 of the Utility
Maintenance Worker range.
6. Annual Leave We agreed to offer annual leave to all current employees at their option
and to put all new hires after 5-5-01 on annual leave in lieu of vacation
and sick leave. The annual leave program is described in a separate
document.
7. Injury on Dutv We agreed to allow Injury on Duty pay to extend to 90 "working"
days instead of 90 "calendar" days. There was a dispute over this
issue for a number of years. We clarified that no employee will
receive more than their normal wages while on Injury on Duty Pay.
8. Insurance We agreed to add the following language:
Where the City provides more than one choice of health insurance plans
from the same provider), the EMPLOYER will pay the cost of employee
single) health insurance coverage and SO% plus $35 of the cost toward
the monthly dependent health coverage for the least costly plan. If the
employee chooses the more costly plan, the employee will pay the dfference
in cost between the two plans.
It is understood that by agreeing to add the language requiring employees
to pay the dfference between a lower and higher cost plan, the
EMPLOYER is not intending to reduce insurance benefits below what is
presently available (12'00). Any changes that are presented at renewal
will be discussed (and agreed to) through the Labor- Management
Committee process. These benefits apply to full -time employees only. 77
The increase from (50% + $20) to (50% + $35) will be effective
March 1, 2001. Employees with dependent coverage will be
reimbursed for the difference retroactive to January 1, 2001.
We agreed to go out for bid for Short -term disability Insurance to be
effective 10 -01 -O 1.
We clarified that employees can use accrued leave to supplement
long -term disability payments up to their normal wages. This was
existing practice.
9. Uniforms We revised this section to increase the number of employees eligible for
coveralls and decrease the number of coveralls to a one time purchase
instead of two pair annually. The positions now eligible are: park,
utility and street maintenance workers; mechanics; engineering
technicians; building inspectors; and the environmental health
inspector. We clarzfzed these coveralls are not to be used outside of City
work and will normally be kept on premises.
We increased the amount of money reimbursed for safety shoes for
employees who are required to wear them. They are now eligible
for reimbursement of up to X165 per pair, per employee per year.An employee may be reimbursed for an extra pair if the shoes are
obviously ruined at work with the expectation that they will not
normally need a new pair the following year.
10. Tools We increased the annual tool allowance to $225 effective 1 -1 -01 and
275 effective 1 -1 -02 for the three mechanic positions.
11. Personnel Files We agreed to remove past discipline from employees' personnel files if there
has been no further discipline within the past five years.
12. Def. Comp. Increase deferred compensation from $85 to $90 per month retroactive
to 1 -1 -01; remain at $90 per month in 2002.
13. Housekeeping There were a few housekeeping changes throughout the
document.
UNIFORM
SETTLEMENT
FORM
PUBLIC
EMPLOYER:
City
of
Maplewood
EXCLUSIVE
REPRESENT
AFSCME
Cler./
Tech. /
Mtce.
UNITLocal
2725
Base
Year
Year
of
Contract
2nd
Year
Base
Year
of
Contract (
if
applicable)
3rd
Year
Base
h1rd
Year
of
Contract (
if
applicable)
1/
1/00-
Dates
1)
12/
31/00
12/
31 /
00-
Dates
2)
12/
30/01
12/
31/01-
N.
A.
Dates
3)
12/
30/02
Dates
4)
N.
A.
Base
wage
5) $
2,
923,736
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
Improvement
14) $
87,
712
Base
wage
28)
3,
062,512
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
Base
wageg
51)
N.
A.
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
Improvement
37) $
114,
844
Improvement
60)
N.
A.
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
Movement
15) $
51,
064
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
Movement
38) $
28,
496
Movement
61)
N.
A.
Base
Social
Security
Contribution
5A) $
223,
666
New $
Social
Security
Contribution
15A) $
10,
616
Base
Social
Security
Contribution
New $
Social
Security
Base
Social
Security
New
Social
Security
RD
YEAR
28A)
234,
282
Contribution
38A) $
10,
966
Contribution
51A)
N.
A.
Contribution
61A)
N.
A.
Base
Local
Retirement
Contribution
513) $
151,
450
New $
Local
Retirement
Contribution
Base
Local
Retirement
New $
Local
Retirement
Base
Local
Retirement
New $
Local
Retirement
15B) $
7,
189
Contribution
28B)
158,
639
Contribution
38B) $
7,
425
Contribution
51B
N.
A.
Contributiontion
61
B)
N.
A.
Base
Medical Insurance
6) $
260
New $
for
Medical
Insurance
16) $
3,
960
Base
Medical
New $
for
Medical
Base
Medical
New
f
or
Medical
Insurance
29)
264,
074
Insurance
39 $
0
Insurance
52)
N.
A.
Insurance
62)
N.
A.
Base
Dental Insurance
7) $
23,
424
New $
for
Dental
Insurance
17) $
0
Base
Dental
New $
for
Dental
Base
Dental
New
f
r
o
Dental
Insurance
30)
23,
424
Insurance
40 $
0
Insurance
53)
N.
A.
Insurance
63)
N.
A.
Base
Life Insurance
8) $
4,
831
New $
for
Life
Insurance
18) $
0
Base
Life
New $
for
Life
Base
Life
Neww $
or
Life
Insurance
31)
4,
831
Insurance
41) $
0
Insurance
54
N.
A.
Insurance
64)
N.
A.
Base
Shift Differential
9 $
0
New $
for
Shift
Differential
19) $
0
Base
Shift Differential
32)
0
New $
for
Shift
Base
Shift
New
foror
Shift
Differential
42) $
0
Differential
55)
N.
A.
Differential
65
N.
A.
Base
Extra-Curricular*
10 ) $
0
New $
for
Extra-
Curricular
20) $
0
Base
Extra-Curricular*
New $
for
Extra-
Base
Extra-
New
for $ o
Extra-
33)
0
Curricular
43) $
0
Curricular*
56)
N.
A.
Curricular
66
N.
A.
Base
Deferred
ComCompensation
11
P ) $
8,
500
New $
for
Deferred Compensation
21) $
1,
000
Base
Deferred Compensation
34)
9,
500
New $
for
Deferred
Base
Deferred
New
foro
Deferred
Compensation
44) $
0
Compensation
57)
N.
A.
Compensation
67
P )
N.
A.
BaseormsOof
er
New $
for
Other
Forms
of
Base
Other
New $
for
Other
Base
Other
Newe $
for
Other
Compensation
12) $
1,
875
Compensation
22) $
3,
750
Forms
of Compensation
35)
5,
625
Forms
of Compensation
45) $
150
Forms
of Compensation
58
N.
A.
Forms
of Compensation
68)
N.
A.
Total
New $
Change
Total
New $
Change
from
Baseline
23) $
165,
291
from
Baseline
46) $
161,
881
Total
New $
Change
from
Baseline
69
N.
A.
Change
Change
from
Baseline
24)
4.
59%
from
Baseline
47)
4.
30%
Change
from
Baseline
70)
N.
A.
Base
Year
Total
Baseline
13) $
3,
597,596
Total
First
Year
Settlement
25) $
3,
762,887
Base
Year
Total
Baseline
36)
3,
762,886
Total
Second
Year
Settlement
48) $
3,
924,767
Base
Year
T
hire
Year
Total
Baseline
59)
N.
A.
Settl
ement
71)
N.
A.
Lump
applies
to
Education
units
only
Sum
Payment --- -------- - - - - -- $
0 ---- - ----
49) -------- - - - - -- -- -----------------------------------------
Lump
Sum
Payment
Lump
Sum
Payment
72)
N.
A.
Form
rev.
5 -
18 -
94
increase
over
Baseline
27)
0.
00%
increase
over
increase
over
Baseline
50)
0.
00%
Baseline
73)
N.
A.
SUPPLEMENTAL
WORKSHEET:
Public
Emplo
Cit
of
Maplewood
OTHER
FORMS
OF
COMPENSATION
Exclusive
Representative:
AFSCME
Unit:
272s
OTHER
FORMS OF COMPENSATION
NUMBER
OF
EMPLOYEES
X
OTHER COMPENSATION DOLLARS
PER
EMPLOYEE
NUMBER
OF
EMPLOYEES
X
NEW
DOLLARS
PER
EMPLOYEE OVER
BOX
A
BOX
A +
B
NUMBER
OF
EMPLOYEES
X
NEW
DOLLARS
PER
EMPLOYEE OVER
BOX
C
BOX
C +
D
NUMBER
OF
EMPLOYEES
X
NEW
DOLLARS
PER
EMPLOYEE OVER
BOX
E
A
B
C
D
E
F
Uniform
or
Clothing
Allowance
1
3
4,
950
0-
0-
Payment
for
Additional
Training
or
Education
150
825
Tool
Allowance
525
150
675
Call -
Back
to
Work
Payment Stand -
By
or
On-
Call
Payment License
Payment
Payment
for
Separating
from
Employment Retirees
Insurance
Payments
150
Column
Total
Enter
Box
45
825
Column
Total
Enter
Box
58
Column
Total
Enter
Box
68
Totals
1
3
5
Column
Total
Column
Total
Enter
Box
12
Enter
Box
22
Column
Total
Enter
Boa
35
s
Agenda No. CV
DATE: January 31, 2001
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
FROM: Sherrie Le
Human Resource Director
SUBJECT: Proposed Settlement -Metro Supervisory Association
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
I have attached the proposed two -year negotiated contract settlement between the
City and the Metro Supervisory Association. This settlement has been ratified by
their membership. In addition, I have included the Bureau of Mediation Services
Uniform Settlement Document. By Law, this must be presented to the City Council
with the proposed settlement.
Approval of this settlement is recommended. If you have any questions, please let me
know.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
AND
METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOCIATION
CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS
TENTATIVE SETTLEMENT
January 18, 2001
1. Duration Two year agreement to expire December 31, 2002.
2 • Wages General wage increase of 3% retroactive to 1 -1 -01. General wage
increase of 3.75% effective January 1, 2001.
Salary Ranges will be replaced with new six step salary range. Current
employees will be moved into the new pay ranges at a step equal to their
current pay rate (or if no equal step exists in the new system, they will
move to the next highest step) on their anniversary date. If they were due
an increase in pay during the contract period, they will be moved to the
closest step in the new ranges that would not result in a loss of pay due to
adopting the new ranges.
Employees will be eligible for a step increase once peryear up to the
maximum pay. This will occur on their anniversary date if their
performance is fully satisfactory on their most recent evaluation.
Employees whose performance is less than fully satisfactofy will not receive
a step increase until they have received two consecutive performance
evaluations that are fully satisfactory. Recreation Program Supervisors
hired in 2001 will start in one of the first two steps of the 2000 salary
ranges (adjusted by the 3% wage increase). They will move to the new
ranges 1 -1 -02.
In addition, six job classes were adjusted to bring them in line
with the 75th percentile of the market (adjusted for merit pay).
3. Recognition Delete title that was moved to non - union; revise two titles that
have changed.
4. Callback Clarified what a callback is for Foreman.
5. Overtime Delete Article 9 in its entirety. Foremen are no longer eligible for
overtime.
6. Seniority Clarified that seniority in many of the provisions refers to `fob
class" seniority. Clarified that regular part -tune employees would be
laid off before regularfull- time employees. Added "transferred"
employees to section dealing with employees promoted outside of
the bargaining unit retaining seniority in the unit for thirty days.
Deleted the letter of understanding providing extended bumping rights to a
particular employee.
7. Job Posting Allows posting of jobs to be concurrent with advertizing for
vacancies.
S. Annual Leave We agreed to offer annual leave to all current employees at their option
and to put all new hires after S -S -DI on annual leave in lieu of vacation
and sick leave. The annual leave program is described in a separate
document.
9. Deferred We increased the City's Contribution to deferred compensation
Compensation by $5 per month (from $85 to $90) retroactive to January 1,
2001. No change in second year.
10. Merit Pay Revise Article 29 - Delete one phrase that no longer applies
related to the former City Manager.
11. Injury on Duty We agreed to allow Injury on Duty pay to extend to 90 working
days instead of 90 calendar days. There was a dispute over this
issue for a number of years. We clarified that no employee will receive
more than their normal wages while on Injufy on Duty Pay.
12. Insurance We agreed to add the following language:
Where the City provides more than one choice of health insurance plans
from the same provider), the EMPLOYER will pay the cost of employee
single) health insurance coverage and SO% plus $35 of the cost toward
the monthly dependent health coverage for the least costly plan. If the
employee chooses the more costly plan, the employee will pay the dfference
in cost between the two plans.
It is understood that by agreeing to add the language requiring employees
to pay the dfference between a lower and higher cost plan, the
EMPLOYER is not intending to reduce insurance benefits below what is
presently available (12'00). Any changes that are presented at renewal
will be discussed (and agreed to) through the Labor- Management
Committee process. These benefits apply to full -time employees
only."
We agreed to go out for bid for Short -term disability Insurance to be
effective 10- 01 -01.
We clarified that employees can use accrued leave to supplement
long -term disability payments up to their normal wages.
13. Personnel Files We agreed to remove past discipline from employees' personnel files if there
has been no further discipline within the past fcveyears. (Previously
stated 3 years.)
14. Uniforms Foremen will be reimbursed $165 every otheryear for safety shoes when
required by the City to wear them.
15. HouselceepinR There were a few housekeeping changes throughout the
document, particularly in the section related to salary ranges.
UNIFORM
SETTLEMENT
FORM
JBLIC
EMPLOYER:
City
of
Maplewood
EXCLUSIVE
REPRESENI
Supervisory
Association
UNIT
Union
Brief
Name
Base.
Year
1
rST
Year
of
Contract
1/
1/00-
12/
31 /
00 -
Dates
1)
12/
31/00
Dates
2)
12/
30/01
Base
wage
5) $
218,
294
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
6,
614
Improvement
14) $
6,
549
New $
Social
Security
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
Contribution
28A)
Movement
15) $
7,
550
Base
Social
Security
New $
Social
Security
Contribution
5A) $
16,
699
Contribution
15A) $
1,
079
RD.
YEAR
12,
038
Contribution
38B)
Base
Local
Retirement
New $
Local
Retirement
Contribution
513) $
11,
308
Contribution
15B) $
730
2nd.
Year
Base
Year
of
Contract (
if
applicable)
3rd
Year
Base
Year
of
Contract (
if
applicable)
12/
31/01 -
N.
A.
Dates
3)
12/
30/02
Dates
4)
N.
A.
Base
wage
28) $
232,
393
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
Base
wage
51)
N.
A.
Improvement
37)
8,
715
Improvement
60)
N.
A.
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
Movement
38)
6,
614
Base
Social
Security
New $
Social
Security
Contribution
61A)
N.
A.
Contribution
28A)
17,
778
Contribution
38A)
1,
173
Base
Local
Retirement
New $
Local
Retirement
16)
Contribution
28B)
12,
038
Contribution
38B)
794
Base
wage
51)
N.
A.
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
Improvement
60)
N.
A.
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
Movement
61)
N.
A.
Base
Social
Security
New $
Social
Security
Contribution
5
1
A)
N.
A.
Contribution
61A)
N.
A.
Base
Local
Retirement
New $
Local
Retirement
Contribution
51
B)
N.
A.
Contribution
61
B)
N.
A.
Base
Medical
New $
for
Medical
Base
Medical
New $
for
Medical
Base
Medical
New $
for
Medical
Insurance
6)
48,
863
Insurance
16)
0
Insurance
29)
48,
863
Insurance
39)
0
Insurance
52)
N.
A.
Insurance
62)
N.
A.
Base
Dental
New $
for
Dental
Base
Dental
New $
for
Dental
Base
Dental
New $
for
Dental
Insurance
7)
4,
608
Insurance
17)
0
Insurance
30)
4,
608
Insurance
40)
0
Insurance
53}
N.
A.
Insurance
63)
N.
A.
Base
Life
New $
for
Life
Base
Life
New $
for
Life
Base
Life
New $
for
Life
Insurance
8)
1,
176
Insurance
18)
0
Insurance
31)
1,
176
Insurance
41)
0
Insurance
54)
N.
A.
Insurance
64)
N.
A.
Base
Shift Differential
9)
0
New $
for
Shift
Differential
Base
Shift
New $
for
Shift
Base
Shift
New $
for
Shift
19)
0
Differential
32)
0
Differential
42)
0
Differential
55)
N.
A.
Differential
65)
N.
A.
Base
Extra-Curricular*
10)
0
New $
for
Extra-
Curricular
Base
Extra-
New $
for
Extra-
Base
Extra-
New $
for
Extra -
20)
0
Curricular*
33)
0
Curricular
43)
0
Curricular*
56)
N.
A.
Curricular
66
N.
A.
Base
Deferred Compensation
11)
12,
240
New $
for
Deferred Compensation
21)
720
Base
Deferred Compensation
34)
12,
960
New $
for
Deferred Compensation
44)
0
Base
Deferred Compensation
57)
N.
A.
New $
for
Deferred Compensation
67)
N.
A.
Base
Other
New $
for
Other
Base
Other
New $
for
Other
Base
Other
New $
for
Other
Forms
of
Forms
of
Forms
of
Forms
of
Forms
of
Forms
of
Compensation
12)
135
Compensation
22)
113
Compensation
35)
248
Compensation
45)
113
Compensation
58)
N.
A.
Compensation
68)
N.
A.
Total
New $
Change
Total
New $
Change
Total
New $
Change
from
Baseline
23)
16,
741
from
Baseline
46)
17,
409
from
Baseline
69)
N.
A.
Change
Change
Change
from
Baseline
24)
5.
34%
from
Baseline
47)
5.
27%
from
Baseline
70)
N.
A.
Base
Year
Total
First
Year
Base
Year
Total
Second
Year
Base
Year
Total
Third
Year
Total
Baseline
13)
313,
323
Settlement
25)
330,
064
Total
Baseline
36)
330,
064
Settlement
48)
347,
473
Total
Baseline
59)
N.
A.
Settlement
71)
N.
A.
Lump
Sum
Payment --
applies
to
Education
units
only
26- Lump
Sum
Payment
49 -
0
L
u
m
p
Y )
N.
A --------------
Sum
Payment
72 -
Form
rev.
5 -
18 -
94
increase
over
Baseline
27)
0.
00%
increase
over
increase
over
Baseline
50)
0.
00%
Baseline
73)
N.
A.
SUPPLEMENTAL
WORKSHEET:
Public
Employer:
cat
OTHER
FORMS
OF
CO
MPENSATION
of
Maplewood
Exclusive
Representative:
Metro
Supervisory
Assoc.
OTHER
FORMS
NiTMBER
OF
NUMBER
OF
Unit:
BOX
A +
B
OF
EMPLOYEES
X
EMPLOYEES
X
COMPENSATION
NUMBER
OF
BOX
C +
D
EMPLOYEES
X
NUMBER
OF
OTHER
NEW
DOLLARS
COMPENSATION
PER
EMPLOYEE
NEW
DOLLARS
EMPLOYEES
X
NEW
DOLLARS
DOLLARS
PER
OVER
BOX
A
PER
EMPLOYEE
PER
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
OVER
BOX
C
OVER
BOX
E
A (
B
C
D
E
Uniform
or
F
Clothing
Allowance $
135 $
112.
50
24.
50
Limit
amount
Unable
to
Calculate
Payment
for
112.
50- $
360
available
to
U
of
M
Additional
Training
Rates.
This
is
or
Education
potential
decrease.
Tool
Allowance
Call -
Back
to
Work
Payment Stand -
By
or
On-
Call
P License
Payment
Payment
for
Separating
from
Employment
T
Retirees
Insurance
Payments Totals $
135 $
112.
50
247.
50 $
112.
50
360
Column
Total
Column
Total
Column
Total
Enter
Box
35
Enter
Box
12
Enter
Box
22
Column
Total
Column
T=
Column
Total
Enter
Box
45
Enter
Box
Enter
Box
68
Agenda No.
DATE: January 31, 2001
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
FROM: Sherrie Le
Human Resource Director
SUBJECT: Proposed Settlement - LELS Local #153
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modred
Rejected
I have attached the proposed two -year negotiated contract settlement between the
City and LELS Local # 153 representing the police officers. This settlement has been
ratified by their membership. In addition, I have included the Bureau of Mediation
Services Uniform Settlement Document. By Law, this must be presented to the City
Council with the proposed settlement.
Approval of this settlement is recommended. If you have any questions, please let me
know.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
AND
LELS #153 - POLICE OFFICERS
CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS
TENTATIVE SETTLEMENT
January 12, 2001
1. Wages and Duration: Two year contract; 3% January 1, 2001; 3.75% January 1, 2002.
Salary Range adjusted by deleting the six month step and changing the starting pay to
70 % of top patrol rate. Rename the steps to Step 1 through Step 4. Add: "It is understood
that the City has the right to start a new hire at any step n the regular salary ranpgY eg
excluding longevity steps) at the City's discretion when hiring an experienced officer."
Wages will be retroactive to 1 -1 -01.
2. Deferred Compensation: Increase from $85 to $90 per month in 2001; remain at $90 per
month in 2002. Deferred compensation increase will be retroactive to 1 -1 -01.
3. Replace the lon evitypay system currently in place. The new system will be 3%, 5%, 7%
and 9% after 4, 8, 12, & 16 years respectively and will apply to all employees. (Article
XXI). Longevity pay increase will be retroactive to 1 -1 -01.
4. Appendix A - Specialty Pay - Increase specialty pay from 4% to 5% for the followin
assignments: juvenile, mall, investigator, and school liaison. Police Paramedics will
continue to receive a 5% differential while working as paramedic officers (patrol, DARE,
or mall officer) until they have worked as paramedics for five years. Specialty pay
increase will be retroactive to 1 -1 -01.
After five yeas working as a paramedic, they will receive a paramedic differential of 8%
thereafter as long as they are not receiving any other specialty pay. Officers working in
any other specialty pay assignments such as school liaison, investigator, juvenile, or
Canine (dog handle) will receive only the specialty pay associated with those
assignments. If they normally receive higher specialty pay due to being a paramedic forSyearsormore, they will be reduced to S% while in these assignments. The past
practice of retaining a higher paramedic differential while carrying out these
assignments will not continue.
5. Article IX - Uniforms - Replace with:
The Employer shall provide required uniform and equipment items, but not to exceed
600 per year. Any amount remaining can be carried over from the previous year, if
unspent, to be spent on necessary uniform items until January 31, of the following year.
Up to $600 per officer for plainclothes officers will be reimbursed for necessary itemsthatarepurchasedinMaplewood." (Plainclothes officers had been $425)
The Employer will reimburse officers 100% of the cost of peace officer license
renewal." (Previous reimbursement was 50 %.)
6. Insurance - Article 17.1 will be replaced with:
Health Insurance - "Where the City provides more than one choice of health insurance
plans (from the same provider), the EMPLOYER will pay the cost of employee (single)
health insurance coverage and 50% plus $35 of the cost toward the monthly dependent
health coverage for the least costly plan. If the employee chooses the more costly plan,
the employee will pay the difference in cost between the two plans. It is understood that
by agreeing to add the language requiring employees to pay the difference between a
lower and higher cost plan, the EMPLOYER is not intending to reduce insurance benefits
below what is presently available (12'00). Any changes that are presented at renewal
will be discussed (and agreed to) through the Labor- Management Committee process.
These benefits apply to full -time employees only. (Previous contract paid 50% + $20
toward dependent coverage for both health and dental.)
Dental, Life and Long -term Disability Insurance - The EMPLOYER shall pay 100% of
the cost of employee (single) dental insurance coverage, a $25,000 group term life
insurance policy, and long term disability insurance for regular full -time employees."
Previous contract paid 50% + $20 toward dependent coverage for both health and
dental.)
Short-term Disability Insurance -The City agrees to go out for bidfor short -term
disability insurance coverage to be effective 10- 01 -01. Employees may elect this optional
coverage at the employee's cost.
7. Article XXII - Tuition Reimbursement -Delete "High School". Add: "The maximum
reimbursement will be based on per credit cost at the University of Minnesota.
Employees may elect to attend a more costly school provided they pay the difference in
cost. Employees must reimburse the City if they voluntarily leave employment within 12
months of reimbursement. "
8. Article XX - Injury on Duty - Add: "Employees shall receive no more than their regular
take -home pay during the 90 working days. " Add: "and other disabili ty paymentsaments
Y ) after
worker's compensation insurance payments" in the first sentence.
9. Revise Vacation and Sick Leave Sections. Vacation Section will be re- labeled as:
Article B -1 Vacation /Annual Leave
B -1 b Change the word "annual" to "vacation."
New) B -1 d -The EMPLOYER and UNION agree to incorporate the Annual Leave
Program as adopted by the City Council on February 12, 2001.
New) B 1 -e - Articles B -1 a through B -1 c do not apply to employees who select annual
leave.
Sick Leave (New) BIIc. Annual Leave - Article B -II does not apply to employees who
accrue annual leave except as provided in the Annual Leave Program (Current Sick
Leave Balance - Deferred Sick Leave and Severance Pay Sections).
10. Add: "Officers on a 5-2 rotation who are required to work on a holidav will be allowed
to take another day off within the pay period plus receive four hours ofpay OR can elect
to receive time and one- halfpay with no time off. This is in addition to regular holiday
pay »
11. Article 13.7 Voluntary rtial Shift Exchan e - Change "4" to "a full shift" andt "same 28gff
day pay cycle" to "same pay period." Replace "The request to exchange hours must be
submitted in writing." with "It is understood that the request must be submitted in
writing to the Lieutenant in charge of scheduling (or the Lieutenant's designees) and
must be approved prior to the first date of the exchange."
UNIFORM
SETTLEMENT
FORM
JBLIC
EMPLOYER:
City
of
Maplewood
EXCLUSIVE
REPRESEN
LE
LS
UNIT
153
Base
Year
F
1
rst
Year
of
Contract
1/
1/00-
12/
31 /
00 -
Dates
1)
12/
31/00
Dates
2)
12/
30/01
Base
wage
5) $
1,
518,238
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
New $
Social
Security
Improvement
14) $
45,
547
Contribution
38A)
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
New $
Local
Retirement
Movement
15) $
16,
668
2nd
Year
Base
F
Seco
Year
of
Contract (
if
applicable)12/
31/01-
Dates
3)
12/
30/02
Base
wage
28) $
1,
565,453
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
New $
Social
Security
Improvement
37)
58,
711
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
Contribution
28A) $
119,
757
Movement
38)
3,
712
New $
Social
Security
Base
Local
Retirement
Contribution
38A)
4,
775
New $
Local
Retirement
Contribution
15B) $
3,
223
Contribution
38B)
3,
233
Base
Social
Security
New $
Social
Security
Base
Social
Security
Contribution
5A) $
116,
145
Contribution
15A) $
4,
759
Contribution
28A) $
119,
757
RD
YEAR
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
New $
for
Medical
Base
Local
Retirement
New $
Local
Retirement
Base
Local
Retirement
Contribution
513) $
78,
645
Contribution
15B) $
3,
223
Contribution
28B) $
81,
090
3rd
Year
Base
Year
of
Contract (
if
applicable)N.
A.
Dates
4)
N.
A.
Base
wage
51)
N.
A.
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
New $
for
Medical
Improvement
60)
N.
A.
Base
Medical
New $
by
Wage
Schedule
New $
for
Medical
Movement
61)
N.
A.
Base
Social
Security
New $
Social
Security
Contribution
51A)
N.
A.
Contribution
61A)
N.
A.
Base
Local
Retirement
New $
Local
Retirement
Contribution
51
B)
N.
A.
Contribution
61
B)
N.
A.
Base
Medical
New $
for
Medical
Base
Medical
New $
for
Medical
Base
Medical
New $
for
Medical
Insurance
6)
147,
990
Insurance
16)
3,
420
Insurance
29)
151,
410
Insurance
39)
0
Insurance
52)
N.
A.
Insurance
62)
N.
A.
Base
Dental
New $
for
Dental
Base
Dental
New $
for
Dental
Base
Dental
New $
for
Dental
Insurance
7)
18,
984
Insurance
17) ($
6,
312)
Insurance
30)
12,
672
Insurance
40)
0
Insurance
53)
N.
A.
Insurance
63)
N.
A.
Base
Life
New $
for
Life
Base
Life
New $
for
Life
Base
Life
New $
for
Life
Insurance
8)
2,
178
Insurance
18)
0
Insurance
31)
2,
178
Insurance
41)
0
Insurance
54)
N.
A.
Insurance
64)
N.
A.
Base
Shift
New $
for
Shift
Base
Shift
New $
for
Shift
Base
Shift
New $
for
Shift
Differential
9)
0
Differential
19)
0
Differential
32)
0
Differential
42)
0
Differential
55)
N.
A.
Differential
65)
N.
A.
Base
Extra-
New $
for
Extra-
Base
Extra-
New $
for
Extra-
Base
Extra-
New $
for
Extra -
Curricular*
10)
0
Curricular
20)
0
Curricular*
33)
0
Curricular
43)
0
Curricular*
56)
N.
A.
Curricular
66)
N.
A.
Base
Deferred
New $
for
Deferred
Base
Deferred
New $
for
Deferred
Base
Deferred
New $
for
Deferred
Compensation
11)
33,
660
Compensation
21)
1,
980
Compensation
34)
35,
640
Compensation
44)
0
Compensation
57)
N.
A.
Compensation
67)
N.
A.
Base
Other
New $
for
Other
Base
Other
New $
for
Other
Base
Other
New $
for
Other
Forms
of
Forms
of
Forms
of
Forms
of
Forms
of
Forms
of
Compensation
12)
19,
770
Compensation
22)
1,
020
Compensation
35)
20,
790
Compensation
45)
495
Compensation
58)
N.
A.
Compensation
68)
N.
A.
Total
New $
Change
Total
New $
Change
Total
New $
Change
from
Baseline
23)
70,
305
from
Baseline
46)
70,
926
from
Baseline
69)
N.
A.
Change
Change
Change
from
Baseline
24)
3.
63%
from
Baseline
47)
3.
56%
from
Baseline
70)
N.
A.
Base
Year
Total
First
Year
Base
Year
Total
Second
Year
Base
Year
Total
Third
Year
Total
Baseline
13)
1,
935,610
Settlement
25)
2,
005,915
Total
Baseline
36)
1,
988,990
Settlement
48)
2,
059,916
Total
Baseline
59)
N.
A.
Settlement
71)
N.
A.
applies
to
Education
units
only
Lump
Sum
Payment
26
0
Lump
Sum
Payment
49j
Lump
Sum
Payment
72)
N.
A.
increase
over
increase
over
increase
over
Form
rev.
5 -
18 -
94
Baseline
27)
0.
00%
Baseline
50)
0.
00%
Baseline
73)
N.
A.
S
UPPLEMENTAL
WORKSHEET:
public
Emplo
Cit
of
Maplewood
OTHER
FORMS
OF
COMPENSATION
Exclusive
Representative:
LELS —
Police
Officer
OTHER
FORMS
NUMBER
OF
NUMBER
OF
Unit:
2725 BOX
A +
B
OF
EMPLOYEES
X
EMPLOYEES
X
NUMBER
OF
BOX
C +
D
NUMBER
OF
COMPENSATION
OTHER
NEW
DOLLARS
EMPLOYEES
X
EMPLOYEES
X
COMPENSATION
PER
EMPLOYEE
NEW
DOLLARS
NEW
DOLLARS
DOLLARS
PER
OVER
BOX
A
PER
EMPLOYEE
PER
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
OVER
BOX
C
OVER
BOX
E
A
B
C
D
E
F
Uniform
or
Clothing
Allowance $
199275 $
525
199800
Limit
amount
Unable
to
Calculate
Payment
for
0- $
19,
800
available
to
U
of
M
Additional
Training
Rates
or
Education Tool
Allowance
Call -
Back
to
Work
Payment Stand -
By
or
On-
Call
Payment License
Payment $
495
495
990
495 $
1.
485
Payment
for
Separating
from
Em
to
ment
Retirees
Insurance
Payments Totals $
199770 $
19020
209790
495
219285
Column
Total
Column
Total
Column
Total
Enter
Box
12
Enter
Box
22
Enter
Box
35
Column
Total
Column
Total
Column
Total
Enter
Box
45
Enter
Box
58
Enter
Box
68
Agenda No. V" Vii_
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: February 2, 2001
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
FROM: Sherri
Human Resource Director
SUBJECT: NON -UNION WAGES SL BENEFITS - 2001/2002
B act ground
Action by comicii
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The City has negotiated tentative agreements with AFSCME, LELS (Police Officers)
and the Metro Supervisory Association for 2001 &.2002. These agreements cover
approximately 148 of our 185 regular employees. There are 28 non - represented,
benefit- earning employees and two non - represented employees who are not benefit-
earning and receive stipends instead of salaries.
One of our goals during negotiations was to decrease the number of discrepancies
between contracts, and between the bargaining units and non -union employees.
While it is not likely that all contracts will ever look alike or that all pay and benefits
plans will be the same, we were able to eliminate some differences. The last step in
this process involves malting changes to wages and benefits for the regular non -union
employees.
The regular non -union positions include:
City Manager
Finance Director
Park SL Rec. Director
Fire Chief
Admin. Asst. - Police
Community Ctr. Mgr.
Payroll Technician
MIS /GIS Technician
Public Works Coord.
Asst. Emer. Mgmt. Dir.
Assistant City Manager
City Cleric
Police Captain
Asst. City Engineer
MIS Coordinator
Fire Marshal II
C.O.S. Coordinator
Rec. Prgm. Manager
Asst. Comm. Dev. Dir.
Police Chief
Public Works Director
Asst. Fire Chief
Asst. Finance Dir.
Executive Assistant
Human Resource Director
Police Lieutenant
Rec. Prgm. Coord. II
Emergency Mgmt. Dir.
General Wage Increase
All three bargaining units settled for 3% retroactive to January 1, 2001 and 3.75%
effective January 1, 2002. We recommend that regular non -union employees receive
this same wage adjustment.
Recommended Wade Adjustments based on Market:
We also made adjustments to a number of salary ranges in each of the three
bargaining units to bring wages into a better position relative to the external market.
We used Stanton Group V cities (excluding Bloomington) for the market comparison
whenever data was available.
For most groups we also added a requirement that performance be fully satisfactory
to achieve an increase within the salary range. Movement within the range will
continue to be based on performance for non -union employees. We recommend
adopting market adjustments for the following salary ranges so we can retain internal
equity among the groups.
job Title Recommended Adjustment (before 3% COLA)
Admin. Asst. - Police From $37,791 - $50,457 to $41,073 - $54,160
Assistant City Manager From $61,712 - $82,394 to $64,570 - $84,532
Asst. Comm. Dev. Dir.From $50,000 - $63,633 to $53,578 - $65,327
Asst. Finance Dir.From $50,244 - $66,312 to $52,134 - $69, 174
City Manager Adjust Minimum Salary (only) from $80,921 to $86,871
Executive Assistant From $35,201 - $44,298 to $37,417 - $48,937
Finance Director Adjust Minimum Salary (only) from $64,355 to $66,426
MIS Coordinator From $44,018 - $58,768 to $51,477 - $66,000
MIS /GIS Technician From $35,690 - $46,350 to $36,052 - $47,095
Park & Rec Director From $61,712 - $82,394 to $65,023 - $84,526
Payroll Technician Adjust Minimum Salary (only) from $31,662 to $31,854
Police Captain Adjust Minimum Salary (only) from $61,014 to $64,563
Police Chief From $64,355 - $85,921 to $71,754 - $88,537
Police Lieutenant Adjust Minimum Salary (only) from $57,300 to $59,028
Public Works Coord.From $48,307 - $62,367 to $52,31 1 - $66,385
Public Works Director From $64,355 - $85,921 to $68,973 - $90,085
Rec. Program Coord. II From $43,499 - $53,567 to $45,207 - $58,768
Recommended Benefit Chan es:
Annual Leave - We developed a new «p w benefit entitled Annual Leave" which has beensubmittedunderseparatecoverforapproval. We request that annualoptionalfora1qual leave beop1benefit-earning non -union employ ' red before Maygpyeeshi 5 2001.We would like it to be mandato y '
ry for all new hires on or after that date.provided ' AnnualLeaveispinlieuofvacationandsickleave.
Health Insurance - We recommend the following language to apply to all benefit-earning non -union employees to be consistent with labor agreements.
Where the City provides more than one choice of health insurance plansfromthesameprovider), the EMPLOYER will pay the cost of employeesingle) health insurance coverage and SO% plus $35 of the cost toward themonthlydependenthealthcoveragefortheleastcostlyplan. If the employeechoosesthemorecostlyplan, the employee will pay the difference in costbetweenthetwoplans.
It is not the City's intent to reduce insurance benefits below what is presentlyavailable.
RECOMMENDATION
Please submit to the City Council for approval.
Agenda #
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
A—
FROM: Sher rLe
Human Resource Director
RE: Personnel Policies
DATE: February 6, 2001
Action by Council
Date
indorsed
Modified
Rejected
I have made a number of changes to the Personnel Polices, primarily to incorporate
annual leave. There are also a few other miscellaneous changes that are described
below.
Section
2 Employee Responsibilities
3 Definitions
6 Leave Policy For Non -Union
Exempt Employees
9 Leaves
Change
Added "and staff" to requirement to conduct
themselves with decorum toward "residents."
Updated list of Senior Management Staff.
Deleted individual titles; described generally.
Added language referencing annual leave.
11 Discipline, Work -Rule Offenses Added three work -rule offenses:
Spreading negative rumors about other
employees"
Bringing negative public opinion upon the
city by one's conduct"
Treating other employees in an
unprofessional or disrespectful manner
including making hurtful, disparaging or
cutting remarks. (Instructive comments and
suggestions for improvement are encouraged
provided they are given in a positive,
constructive manner.)"
13 Employee Education Added a cap and a requirement to reimburse
the City if the employee leases within 1 year
of reimbursement.
RECOMMENDATION
Please submit to City Council for approval.
C. Read, understand and comply with the rules and re 'regulations as set forth in
these Personnel Policies as well as those of their department.p ent.
D. Conduct themselves with decorum toward both residents and staff and
respond to inquiries and information requests iqwith patience and every
possible courtesy.
E. Report all unsafe conditions to their immediate supervisor.pe isor.
F. Maintain good attendance as it is an essential requirement 'q ement of every City
position.
APPEARANCE
Departments may establish dress codes for employees as part of departmental rules.
Overall, personal appearance should be appropriate to the nature of the work and
contacts with other people and should instill confidence and r positive 'p esent a positive imagetothepublic.
FALSIFICATION OF RECORDS
No person shall make false statements certificates 'marks, ratings, or reports in
regard to any test, certificate, or appointment held or made under the City personnel
system, or in any manner commit or attempt to commit an fraudpyand preventing theimpartialexecutionofthepersonnelolicies. Such a •p acts will be cause for immediate
disciplinary action and possibly grounds for criminal rposecution.
RENDERING OF CONSIDERATION
No person shall, directly or indirect) give or makeYg available any valuable
consideration to any person on account of or in connectioncoon with any test, appointment,
or promotion. Such acts will be cause for immediate disciplinary 'p nary action, possiblecriminalprosecution, and /or elimination of a candid 'ate from consideration for
appointment.
ATTENDANCE
The operations and standards of service in the City 'y f Maplewood require that
employees be at work unless compelling easons warrantt absence. Absence and
tardiness records reflect an employee's responsibility to 'Y p y his/her job and to fellow
workers. These records have a direct effect on employment status and progress.
4
SENIOR MANAGEMENT STAFF" - This designation includes the following positions:g g p sitions.
City Manager, all department heads, Assistant City Manager, and City Clerk.Y g y
TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE" - An employee who is employed on either a full-timetme or
part -time basis in a temporary position (one that is not intended to be ongoing) wheregg) e
no benefit eligibility exists and no credit is given for seniority. Temporary employeesYprypoyees
earn no employment rights. Temporary positions are normally less than one hundred
days in duration.
SECTION 4 - EMPLOYEE RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION
SCOPE
The, Human Resource Director will manage the hiring process for all re 'g g p regular positions
within the City. All applications for regular full -time and art -time employmentppyment shall be
submitted to the Human Resource Department for consideration. on. The Human
Resource Director will utilize department resources to assist in the rocep ss as
appropriate.
FEATURES OF THE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM
A. Regular Position Vacancy Announcements: Position vacancies,for regular full -
time part -time positions, shall be published b postingYpg on
official City bulletin boards for at least 10 days. Such postings willYpg normally
specify the title and salary of the positions; the nature of the work to be
performed; the minimum and essential requirements 'q ments of the position; the time and
place to apply; the closing date for receiving applications; and othergpp pertinent
information.
B. Application Forms: Application shall normal) be made 'y on application forms
provided by the Human Resource Department. Supplemental questionnairesppqsnnaires
may be required in certain situations. All candidates must complete requiredequired
application materials with original signatures, and ensure the aree submitted by
the application deadline, in order to be considered for the ' 'position. The deadline
for application may be extended by the Human Resource Director after
consultation with the appropriate department head.
C. Appointments and promotions in the City ervice shall be madede according to
merit and fitness related to the position being filled. Vacant ositions will be filleded
on the basis of a regular, part -time casual, paid per call, intermittent seasonal
or temporary appointment.
12
C. Holidays, sick leave and vacation will 'count as time worked for purposes ofcomputingovertimefornon-exempt employeesp who are not covered by a laboragreement.
D. Non - exempt temporary employees, will be paid overtime for work in excess offorty (40) hours per week and will not receive or accrue compensatory time.
E. Exempt employees are not eligibleg for overtime unless express) provided b aapplicableYpY n
a pp collective bargaining agreement.
F. The workweek begins on Saturday at 12.01 a.m. and ends on the followingFridaytmidnight.Y
LEAVE POLICY FOR NON -UNION EXEMPT EMPLOYEES
Senior management staff are normal) 'y required to work the number of hours
necessary to fulfill their responsibilities including eveninggWing meetings and /or on -callhours. The normal hours of business f 'or senior management staff are Monday8a.m. tthroughFriday, o 5 p.m., plus evening meetings as necessary. ary. Senior
management staff are required to use aid leave whennon personal business or awayfromtheofficeforfourhoursormore, on a given day.
Absences of less than four hours don of require use of paid leave as it is resumefP dthatthestaffmemberregularlyputsinextrahoursaboveandbeyondthenormal8a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday requirement. Y q ment. Employees must communicatetheirabsencetotheCityManagerorhi 'Y g his/her designee.
If one of the above employees reregularlygly absents themselves from work undersoi thisPolicy, t appears that less than 40 hours er weekek is needed to fulfill the position'sresponsibilities, the position will be reviewed to determine whether apart -time ositionwillmeettheneedsofthep
City. Additional notification and approval 'pp al requirements maybeadoptedbytheCityManagerforspecific 'g p is situations as determined necessarytheManager.y
All other non -union exempt positions 'p p may also require work beyond 40 hours erweek. In recognition for p
g working extra hours, these employees ma 'off y take some timeoduringtheirnormalworkinghourswithsupervisorygupervisoryapproval. The time off for extrahourswillnotnormallybeonaone -for-one basis.
21
The City Manager will decide whether conditions indicate a general excused absence
for those unable to report to work due to the adverse weather. Employees shall take
vacation, personal holiday or unpaid time. Decisions to cancel departmental
programs (special events, after school programs, etc) will be made by the respective
department head or his /her designee.
SECTION 9 - LEAVES
SICK LEAVE
A. Sick leave is authorized absence from duty with pay, granted to full -time and
part -time benefit - earning employees hired prior to May 5, 2001 who are not on
annual leave. Sick leave is not a privilege for an employee to use at his /her
discretion, but shall be allowed only when the employee is unable to work for
medical reasons and under the conditions explained below.
B. Full -time employees hired before May 5, 2001 shall accumulate sick leave at a
rate of one -and one - quarter (1 -1 /4) days per month, accrued on a pay - period
basis. Employees hired before May 5, 2001 who are covered by the Police Civil
Service Commission cannot accumulate more than 300 days of sick leave.
Employees hired on or after May 5, 2001 will not accumulate sick leave.
C. Regular part -time employees hired before May 5, 2001 will accumulate sick
leave on a pro -rated basis according to actual hours worked (up to 40 per week)
as compared to a 2,080 hour full -time work year.
D. Temporary and seasonal employees, paid - per -call employees, intermittent and
part -time casual employees shall not be entitled to sick leave.
E. Sick leave does not accrue during an unpaid leave of absence.
F. Administration of Sick Leave - The following procedures will be followed in
administering the sick leave policy of the City:
1. After all accrued sick leave is used, vacation may be used upon approval of
the supervisor, to the extent the employee is entitled to such leave.
2. Sick leave may be approved only for days when an employee would
otherwise have been at his or her employment. It may be used, with the
approval of the supervisor, in any of the following cases:
24
a. when the employee cannot work because of the illness, injury, or
disability of themselves, their children, spouse, parents, stepchildren or
stepparents;
b. for medical, dental, chiropractic or optical examinations or treatment of
the employee, or employee's children (appointments should be
scheduled to minimize the amount of disruption to the work day);
c. when the employee's presence would jeopardize the health of other
employees by exposing them to contagious disease;
d. during the period of incapacity when an employee is on Family and
Medical Leave for their own illness or injury or the serious health
condition of eligible family members.
3. To receive credit for sick leave, an employee must communicate with his or
her immediate supervisor following department procedures on reporting.
Employees are responsible for keeping their supervisors advised of their
illness status to remain eligible for sick leave, unless they are hospitalized
and cannot reasonably do so. (See Attendance Policy)
4. After an absence, a physician's statement may be required on the first day
of return to work, indicating the nature of the illness or medical condition
and attesting to the employee's ability to return to work and safely perform
the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable
accommodation.
Any work restrictions must be stated clearly on the return to work form.
Employees who have been asked to provide such a statement may not be
allowed to return to work until they comply with this provision. Sick leave
will not be approved for employees who are required to provide a doctor's
statement until such a statement is provided.
5. If the City feels an additional medical opinion is warranted, the Human
Resource Director will arrange for the appropriate medical evaluation. The
City has the right to require employees to be evaluated by the City's
physician to determine the validity of a worker's compensation or sick leave
claim, or to obtain information related to restrictions or an employee's ability
to work.
6. Sick leave cannot be transferred from one employee to another.
25
7. Employees who make a claim for sick leave as a result of false or otherwise
fraudulent claims shall be required to reimburse the City for such payments
and shall be subject to suspension or discharge at the Manager's discretion.
See Discipline Policy, Section 11)
8. In accordance with state law, employees may use sick leave during
Parenting Leave at their option. Employees must normally use sick leave
prior to using paid vacation, or compensatory time and prior to an unpaid
leave of absence during a medical leave, except where parenting leave and
the medical leave overlap.
9. Sick Leave will not be approved after an employee gives notice that he or
she will be terminating employment. Any exceptions must be approved by
the Human Resource Director or City Manager.
G. Sick Leave Conversion On December 31st of each Y ear, a full -time non -union
employee with 800 hours or more of accumulated sick leave shall be eligible to
convert sick leave accumulated in the previous 12 months to vacation or
deferred compensation at the employee's current pay rate on the basis of 2
hours of sick leave for 1 hour of vacation or deferred compensation. Such
conversion shall not exceed a total of 48 hours of vacation and deferred
compensation. The amount of sick leave, earned and unused in the prior y ear
which is eligible for conversion, shall be prorated for part -time non -union
employees. This section does not apply to employees who accrue annual leave.
See annual leave policy.)
H. Nothing in this policy shall restrict the Employer from requiring an employee toqg
provide a doctor certification for any sick leave requested or as permission for
unlimited leave.
I. Employees hired on or after May 5, 2001 will automatically gbeeligible for annual
leave and will not accrue sick leave. Employees hired before then will have the
option to convert to annual leave during one of two open window p eriods
specified in the Annual Leave Policy. Once an employee elects annual leave
they will no longer accrue sick leave. As a result, the following portions of this
section will not apply to employees on annual leave: A, B, C, D, E, F1, F2 F3
F4 F6 F7 F8 and G.
26
MILITARY LEAVE
Minnesota Statutes Section 192.26 and 192.261 provides that an employee of any
municipality who is a member of the National Guard, the Naval Militia, the Officers
Reserve Corps, the Naval Reserve, the Marine Corps Reserve or any other reserve
component of the military or naval forces of the United States, is entitled to a leave of
absence without loss of pay, seniority status, efficiency rating, or benefits for the time
such employee is engaged in training or active service not exceeding a total of 15
days in any calendar year.
The leave of absence is only in the event the employee returns to employment
immediately upon being relieved from military or naval service, or is prevented from
returning by physical or mental disability or other cause not the fault of the employee,
or is required by the proper authority to continue in military or naval service beyond
the 15 day period allowed for the paid leave of absence.
Notice shall be given the employer at least fifteen working days in advance of the
requested leave. Notice may be waived under certain circumstances.
In accordance with State Law, the employee shall be granted an unpaid leave of
absence when called to active duty. If an employee has not yet used their fifteen
days of paid leave when called to active duty, any unused paid time will be allowed
prior to the unpaid leave of absence.
Eligibility for continuation of insurance coverage will follow the same procedures as for
any terminated or laid -off employee while the employee is on an unpaid leave of
absence for active duty. In addition, the first 30 days of the leave of absence shall be
considered work time for the purposes of vacation, sick leave, or annual leave
accrual.
Returning reservists have the right to return to their jobs or another job of similar
seniority, status, and pay upon completion of active duty in accordance with M.S.
192.261, Subd. 2 and 38 U.S.C. Section 2021 AND 2024.
JURY DUTY
Regular full -time and part -time employees shall be granted paid leaves of absence for
required jury duty. Such employees shall be required to turn over any compensation
they receive for jury duty, minus mileage reimbursement, to the City in order to
receive their regular wages for the period. Time spent on jury duty shall not be
counted as time worked in computing overtime.
27
D. After thirty (30) days of employment, all employees hired to fill a regular full -time
or regular part -time position will receive pay for official holidays at their normal
straight time rates, provided they are on paid status on the last scheduled day
prior to the holiday and first scheduled day immediately after the holiday.
Employees on other leaves of absence without pay from the City shall not be
eligible for holiday pay.
The thirty (30) day waiting period shall be waived, provided the employee does
not terminate employment within six months of their start date. Employees who
terminate within six months shall reimburse the City for any holidays they were
paid for within the first 30 days of employment.
E. Overtime for working holidays, as may be provided for certain employees, shall
be for hours worked on the "actual" holiday as opposed to the "observed"
holiday.
F. Temporary, seasonal, part -time casual and intermittent employees who are
required to work on New Year's Eve, New Year's Day, Memorial Day, the 4th of
July and the day after Thanksgiving will be paid a holiday differential of $2 per
hour.
VACATION
A. Full -time employees hired before May 5, 2001 normally accrue vacation on a
biweekly basis at the following rate:
One through four years of service - 10 days
Five through eleven years of service - 15 days
Twelve through twenty years of service - 20 days
After twenty years of service - 25 days
Regular part -time employees hired before May 5, 2001 accrue vacation on a pro-
rated basis. Employees hired on or after May 5, 2001 will automatically be
eligible for annual leave and will not accrue vacation.
Employees hired before then will have the option to convert to annual leave
during one of two open window periods specified in the Annual Leave Policy.
Once an employee elects annual leave, they will no longer accrue vacation. As
a result, the following portions of this section will no longer apply to employees
on annual leave: A, F, G, and I.
29
B. For purposes of accumulating additional vacation leave, an employee usin g
accrued vacation or sick leave shall be considered to be working. Use of
deferred sick leave or annual leave will also be considered time worked.
C. Use of accrued vacation or annual leave time shall be ppsubjecttoapproval of the
department head. Requests for time off should typically be received at least 48
hours in advance of the requested time off. This notice may be waived at the
discretion of the department head. Leaves of one week or more normally will
require greater notice.
D. Vacations or annual leave can be requested in increments as small as one hour
up to the full amount accumulated, upon approval. Vacation and annual leave
can be donated to another benefit - earning employee only under extenuating
circumstances as approved by the Human Resource Director and City Manager.er. g
E. Part -time casual employees, paid - per -call, intermittent, temporary and seasonalprY
employees are not eligible for paid vacation or annual leave.
F. Employees may use accrued vacation time upon completion of six (6) months
employment. Exceptions to this waiting period may be approved by the City
Manager prior to hire.
G. Employees are allowed to accumulate up to 1.5 times their annual vacation
accrual. Special written authorization from the City Manager must be g ranted to
accumulate vacation in excess of 1.5 times their annual vacation accrual.
H. When requesting use of vacation time or of sersonalholidays, vacationpY
request form must be completed and approved by the peeemploY 's supervisor. A
copy of this form is kept by the supervisor and one is given to the employee as
approved, or not approved with an explanation
I. Non- probationary employees may request to use vacation during n approvedgpp
Family and Medical Leave after sick leave and compensator time balancesprY
have been exhausted. These employees may also use vacation during Parentingg
Leave.
ANN UAL LEAVE
A. It is the objective of the City of Maplewood to provide consistency nd flexibiliY
in the delivery of paid time off benefit alternatives to City staff. The traditional
paid vacation, sick leave, and personal holidays have been in lace for manY
years.
30
These programs are highly structured with extensive rules applied to their use.
These rules may not provide the best "fit" for the circumstances of individual
employees and their immediate and extended families.
These rules often interject the employer into the personal lives of employees and
require supervisors to make subjective judgments. A good example is who
qualifies as "immediate" family when an employee needs to provide care for
someone in their household who is incapacitated. In addition, the definition of
too sick to work" is extremely subjective and it is impossible to hold everyone to
the same standard.
The Annual Leave Program replaces individual vacation and sick leave plans
and combines them into a single benefit program. Employees would accrue
annual leave based on length of service with the City. This means that
employees all receive the same amount of paid time off, regardless of their
personal or family situation. Plan provisions discourage unnecessary utilization
by providing cash and savings incentives.
With the adoption of this program, the City firmly accepts and endorses the
principles of consistency, flexibility, personal responsibility, and the recognition of
years of service.
B. It is the policy of the City of Maplewood to provide paid time away from work to
eligible employees. This policy is implemented by means of the Annual Leave
Program, which covers all paid leave previously available under the City's
vacation and sick leave benefits. The Annual Leave program does not include
designated or personal holidays, funeral leave, military leave or court leave.
Any sick leave or vacation time that an employee may have used under the
Family and Medical Leave or Parenting Leave policies will become annual leave.
The legal requirements of the time off and continuation of insurance
contributions under those laws remain unchanged. (This means the City will
contribute the same amounts toward health and dental insurance premiums
while employees are on family and medical leave as they would have prior to
annual leave.)
Annual Leave can be used for any reason, subject only to necessary request and
approval procedures consistent with policy and labor contracts. As with all paid
time off programs, we need to ensure that service to the public and work
requirements are not adversely impacted.
31
C. Medical Certification - Good attendance is an essential job function for all City
employees. If unplanned absences are excessive, a doctor's certificate may still
be required. It shall state the nature and duration of the illness or injury and
verify that the employee is unable to perform the duties and responsibilities of
their position. A statement attesting to the employee's ability to return to work
and perform the essential functions of the job and a description of any work
restrictions may also be required before the employee returns to work. (If an
unplanned absence is not viewed as a problem by the employee's supervisor, a
doctor's statement will not be required.)
D. Accrual Rates -
Years of Service Annual Accrual Rates
1 - 4 Years 19 days
5 - 11 Years 24 days
12 - 20 Years 29 days
After 20 Years 34 days
Annual Leave shall not accrue during unpaid leaves. Regular part -time
employees shall accrue annual leave on a pro -rated basis based on regular
hours worked.
Annual leave will accrue on apay- period basis (as vacation and sick leave do)
for up to 62 days. Employees can carry over up to their full balance as long as
the total balance never exceeds the 62 day cap. No additional accrual will occur
above the cap.
Annual Leave shall be provided to employees covered by a collective bargaining
agreement as it is negotiated into contracts. Employees hired prior to May 5,
2001 who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that contains annual
leave, shall have the option to remain in the sick leave and vacation plans.
They also have the option to convert to annual leave during one of two open
window periods. The first open window period will be a 60 day period shortly
after City Council approval of the labor agreement incorporating annual leave.
The second open window period will be the month of September, 2001 during
our regular open enrollment period for benefits. Employees hired after the
agreement is ratified by both parties will automatically be provided annual leave
if they are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that has incorporated
annual leave.
32
Non -union employees hired prior to May 5, 2001 will have the option to convert
to annual leave during two similar open enrollment periods - which will likely
coincide with open enrollment periods set up for other employees. Those hired
after May -5 -01 will automatically be provided annual leave.
E. Current Sick Leave Balances: Deferred Sick Leave - Employees hired prior to
May 5, 2001 who have accrued sick leave and who elect to participate in the
annual leave program will retain their current sick leave balance to be used as
deferred sick leave" until the balance is exhausted. Deferred sick leave can be
used for any doctor certified extended leave that would have been covered under
the previous sick leave policy in effect December 31, 2000. An extended leave
for purposes of this policy is defined as one requiring an employee to be out of
work for more than three consecutive days.
If an employee knows they will be out for more than three consecutive days
before the absence, they will be eligible to use the deferred sick leave bank from
the first day. For example, if an employee has a scheduled surgery where they
know - in advance - they will be out for two weeks, the employee will be able to
use hours from their deferred sick leave bank starting on the first day of the
absence. If an employee is out and expects to return within three days, they will
use annual leave.
If the medical condition extends beyond the three days, the deferred sick leave
bank will be applied retroactively and any annual leave used will be restored to
the annual leave balance.
Once the deferred sick leave bank is exhausted, employees will use annual
leave for all absences covered by the annual leave program - up to the point that
disability insurance coverage goes into effect. Any deferred sick leave balance
remaining when an employee leaves City service will expire unless the employee
would have been eligible for sick leave as severance pay prior to electing annual
leave. (See Severance Pay below.)
F. Current Vacation Balances - Unused vacation balances shall be converted to
annual leave on a one -for -one basis.
G. Banked Personal Holiday Hours - Employees who have banked personal holiday
hours that were earned and unused prior to March, 1984 will have the option to
cash them out at their current hourly rate during the open window period or to
retain them.
33
H. Short Term Disability Insurance - The City will adopt an optional short term
disability insurance program effective October 1, 2001. The cost of this
coverage will be paid by the employee, if the employee elects coverage. For
employees who elect this coverage, the benefits will begin after an employee is
out for 30 calendar days.
The City already has a long term disability program in place where benefits begin
at 90 calendar days. Short term disability benefits will therefore cover the period
from 30 calendar days to 90 calendar days. Employees may use sick leave
hours from the deferred sick leave bank to make up the difference between pay
provided by short- and long -term disability insurance payments and their regularYg
take -home pay.
I. Severance Pay - Under the current vacation and sick leave programs,
employees are eligible for 100% of their vacation and personal holiday balance
when they leave City employment. Some employees are also eligible for 50% of
their sick leave balance when they leave. Eligibility for sick leave as severance
varies by group with different maximum payouts depending on the group. For
some groups there are different severance pay benefits dependent upon an
employee's start date.
When a current employee elects annual leave, their eligibility for severance pay
will change somewhat. If the employee would have been eligible for sick leave
as severance prior to electing annual leave, they will retain their eligibility (using
the remaining deferred sick leave balance) under the same conditions as were in
place before they elected annual leave.
For example, if an employee was eligible for 50% of their sick leave balance up
to a cap of 50 days - prior to electing annual leave, they will be eligible for 50% of
their deferred sick leave balance up to 50 days when they leave City service.
New employees, and current employees who elect annual leave, will be eligible
for 100% of their annual leave balance when they leave City service. They may
receive this as cash or deferred compensation (subject to IRS regulations).
J. Unpaid Leave - Unpaid leaves may be approved in accordance with the City
Personnel Policies. Employees must normally use all accrued annual leave prior
to taking an unpaid leave. If the leave qualifies under parenting leave or family
and medical leave, the employee may retain a balance of 40 hours when going
on an unpaid leave. Any exceptions to this policy must be approved by the City
Manager.
34
K. Sick Leave Conversion - There are various sick leave conversion ro rams inpg
existence which cover different employee groups. Some programs vary within agrY
particular group based on hire date. Employees who opt into annual leave will
be able to convert annual leave to cash or deferred compensation ap s described
below. Employees who do not elect annual leave may continue to convert sick
leave and /or vacation based on programs in effect in December 2000.
L. Annual Leave Conversion - Annual leave will be eligible for conversion to cash or
deferred compensation on a one - for -one basis (subject to IRS maximum deferral
regulations) annually subject to the following conditions. Up to 40% of the
annual leave balance, not to exceed 80 hours, may be converted each Y ear
provided the employee has used a minimum of 30% of their annual accrual
during the current calendar year and has a minimum balance of at least 176
hours. The minimum balance requirement will be determined as of the first
payroll in December and will be based on the employee's current hourly rate on
December 1.
Conversion to cash or deferred compensation will occur in the second p a Y roll of
the following year with specific dates to be determined by the Finance
Department each year. Finance will notify all employees who are accruingg
annual leave in November of each year as to the dates and conversion options.
The conversion will be part of regular payroll and will not be aid in a separatepp
check. Regular rate for the purpose of this policy is the employee's strai ht timeg
rate not including overtime, pay differentials, out -of -class adjustments or any
other additions to regular pay.
JOB RELATED INJURIES OR ILLNESS
A. All employees are required to immediately report all job-related illnesses or
injuries to their supervisor immediately (no matter how minor). If a supervisor is
not available and the nature of injury or illness requires immediate treatment the
employee shall go to the nearest available medical facility or treatment and, , as
soon as possible, notify his /her supervisor and the managed care provider of the
action taken.
If the injury is not of an emergency nature, but requires medical attention the
employee shall report it to the supervisor and call the aremanaged provider tog
schedule a medical appointment.
B. Worker's Compensation benefits and procedures to return to work shall be
applied according to applicable State and Federal laws.
35
FUNERAL LEAVE
A. One day of funeral leave with pay shall be extended to an employee u on thep
death of a member of the immediate family of said employee or employee'sY
spouse (i.e., spouse, children, sons -in law, daughters -in -law, g randchildren,
parents, grandparents, brothers or sisters), for attendance to the funeral or other
demonstrated need in relation thereto.
B. Any leave beyond one day, up to a maximum of three (3) days, must be
approved by the department head or City Manager. Eligibility for time off in
accordance with this policy will be pro -rated for part -time employees.
C. The actual amount of time off, and funeral leave approved, will be determinedd by
the department head or City Manager depending on individual circumstances
such as the closeness of the relative, arrangements to be made distance to the
funeral, etc.).
PARENTING LEAVE
A. Employees who work 20 hours or more per week and have been employed m ore
than one year are entitled to take an unpaid leave of absence in connection with
the birth or adoption of a child. The leave may not exceed six weeks and mustY ,
begin not more than six weeks after the birth or adoption of the child.
B. Employees are not required to use sick leave during parental leave but may use
sick leave at their option for any period of this leave they are unable to work due
to medical reasons. In addition, sick leave (or annual leave if accruing annual
leave) of up three (3) days for a normal delivery and four (4) days for caesarean
may be requested by employees in order to take their spouse to the hospital for
delivery and during the days immediately following the birth including bringing the
spouse and child home.
C. The employee is entitled to return to work in the same osition and atp the same
rate of pay the employee was receiving prior to commencement of the leave.
Group insurance coverage will remain in effect durin g the six week leave.
D. If the employee has any FMLA eligibility remainin g at the time this leave
commences, this leave will also count as FMLA leave. The two leaves will run
concurrently until eligibility for either leave expires.
36
Leave without pay hours will not count toward seniority and all accrued vacation
and compensatory time (and annual leave if applicable) must normally be used
before an unpaid leave of absence will be approved.
C. To qualify for leave without pay, an employee need not have used all sick leave
earned unless the leave is for medical reasons. Leave without pay for purposes
other than medical leave or work - related injuries will be at the convenience of the
City.
D. Employees returning from a leave without pay for a reason other than a qualified
Parenting or Family and Medical leave, will be guaranteed return to the original
position only for absences of 30 calendar days or less.
Employees receiving leave without pay in excess of thirty (30) calendar days, for
reasons other than qualified Parenting or Family and Medical Leave, are not
guaranteed return to their original position. If their original position or a position
of similar or lesser status is available, it may be offered at the discretion of the
department head subject to approval of the City Manager.
FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE
A. GENERAL
In accordance with the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) unpaid job
protected leave will be granted to all eligible employees (male and female) for up
to twelve (12) weeks per twelve (12) month period for any of the following
reasons:
1. Birth, or placement of a child with the employee for adoption or foster care;
2. To care for a spouse, child or parent who has a serious health condition; or
3. For a serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform the
essential functions of the position.
In accordance with the law, the following definitions apply:
Caring" for someone includes psychological as well as physical care. It also
includes acquiring care and sharing care duties.
An eligible "child" is defined as a person under 18 years of age (or a person
incapable of self -care because of a physical or mental disability) who is a biological,
adopted, foster or step child, a ward of the employee, or a person with whom the
employee is charged with a parent's rights, duties and responsibilities.g p
38
M. USE OF ACCRUED COMPENSATORY TIME OR PAID LEAVE DURING FAMILY
AND MEDICAL LEAVE
During the family and medical leave, employees must use accrued sick leave and
compensatory time prior to taking an unpaid leave unless their medical
condition /injury is covered by worker's compensation or the absence qualifies under
the State Parental Leave law (see Parental Leave policy).
Employees may use accrued vacation (or annual leave) if they so choose, after their
sick leave accrued is exhausted. Use of accrued sick leave is limited by the City's
policy governing the use of sick leave. When sick leave and compensatory time
have been exhausted, any remaining time will be unpaid except for vacation or
annual leave requested by the employee.
Affect On Pension - FMLA leave counts as continued service for purposes of
retirement or pension plans.
Training - Employees who have missed training sessions while on FMLA leave will
be given a reasonable opportunity to make them up.
N. RECORDS RETENTION
Records on FMLA leave will be kept along with normal payroll records except that
any medical record will be maintained separately as a confidential medical record in
accordance with the law.
O. FAILURE TO RETURN FROM FMLA LEAVE
1. Employees who cannot return from an approved Family and Medical Leave at
the end of the approved leave period must request an extension (up to the
maximum of twelve (12) weeks allowed). If the twelve allowable weeks have
already been used, the employee can request to go on a regular unpaid leave
of absence. If approved, the employee will be required to pay the full cost of all
group insurance, as allowed under COBRA, in order to continue coverage.
2. If the unpaid leave of absence is not approved or the employee fails to request
additional leave, the employee will be considered to have voluntarily quit in
accordance with the Attendance Policy in Section 2.
3. If circumstances beyond the employee's control prevented the employee from
requesting additional leave, a retroactive leave request may be allowed,
subject to the City Manager's approval.
42
The written resignation must state the effective date of their resignation. Failure to
comply with this procedure may be considered cause for denying such employees future
employment with the City and severance pay.
SEVERANCE PAY
A. All regular employees who leave the employ of the City in good standing by
retirement or resignation shall receive pay for 100% of unused accrued vacation or
annual leave (and compensatory time if applicable).
B. Employees hired before May 5, 2001 shall also receive pay for one -half ('h) of their
accumulated sick leave with a maximum allowance of 50 days pay unless they are
covered by a collective bargaining agreement that states otherwise.
C. Employees who move from a bargaining unit position to a non -union position will be
eligible for severance pay as described in "B" above for sick leave hours accrued
and unused after the date of the change to non -union status. Hours accrued and
unused prior to the change will be covered by the applicable union contract in effect
at the time of the change.
D. Employees on annual leave will be eligible for severance pay in accordance with the
annual leave policy.
ARTICLE 11 - DISCIPLINE
GENERAL POLICY
City employees shall be subject to disciplinary action for failing to fulfill their duties and
responsibilities, including observance of work rules adopted by the City. Supervisors are
responsible for maintaining compliance with City standards of employee conduct. The
City reserves the right to use discretion in applying this policy as circumstances warrant.
City employees are expected to fulfill their duties and responsibilities at the level required,
including observance of work rules and standards of conduct. Failure to do so may result
in disciplinary action.
The reporting of misconduct and prevention of the escalation of misconduct are areas
that demand all employees to exercise courage, integrity, and decisiveness. When a
non - supervisory employee becomes aware of possible misconduct by another City
employee, the employee shall immediately notify a supervisor.
44
Violation of departmental policies, procedures or rules.
Absenteeism and /or tardiness.
Off -duty conduct that is potentially damaging to the reputation of the City.
Carelessness or negligence with the monies or the property of the City.
Horseplay - actions adversely affecting safety of normal operations of the
department or other employees.
Failing to start work at designated time, abuse of break or meal periods,
quitting work before the proper time or leaving employer's premises during
working hours without authorization from the supervisor.
Smoking in posted or unauthorized areas.
Vending, soliciting or collecting contributions on the employer's time or
premises without prior authorization from the appropriate department head
and /or City Manager.
Spreading negative rumors about other employees.
Bringing negative public opinion upon the City by one's conduct
Treating other employees in an unprofessional or disrespectful manner
including making hurtful, disparaging or cutting remarks. (Instructive comments
and suggestions for improvement are encouraged provided they are given in a
positive, constructive manner.
PROCESS
The City may elect to use progressive discipline with any employee. There may be
circumstances that warrant deviation from the suggested order or where progressive
discipline is not appropriate. Nothing in this article or these personnel policies implies
that any City employee has a property right to the job they perform.
Disciplinary letters will be placed in the employee's personnel file. These letters will be
removed after a five year period If no further discipline (including oral reprimands) occurs
within that period.
47
B. Courses must be directly related to a reasonable promotional opportunity in the
same field of work as present position (whether part of a degree program or not).
The City will pay 50% of the cost of tuition and books upon successful completion (C
grade), 75% reimbursement upon completion with a "B" grade, and 100% reimbursement
upon completion with an "A" grade. Courses taken "pass /fail" will be reimbursed at the
same percentage as a C grade (if passed). All reimbursements will be pro -rated for part-
time employees.
The maximum reimbursement will be based on per credit cost at the University of
Minnesota. Employees may elect to attend a more costly school provided they pay the
difference in cost. Employees must reimburse the City if they voluntarily leave
employment within 12 months of reimbursement.
MEMBERSHIPS AND DUES
The purpose of memberships to various professional organizations must be directly
related to the betterment of the services of the City. Normally, one City membership per
agency, as determined by the responsible authority is allowed, providing funds are
available.
Upon separation of employment, individual memberships remain with the City and are
transferred to other employees by the department head.
SECTION 14 - CONFIDENTIALITY /DATA PRACTICES
DATA PRACTICES ADVISORY
During the course of employment, the City of Maplewood will require employees to
provide data that is classified by State law as either private or confidential.
Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given
to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be
given to the public or the subject of the data.
The City requests this information for various reasons pertaining to employment with the
City. The information provided may be used to process pay and benefits, evaluate
performance, determine pay increases, evaluate suitability for an employee's position or
other positions, determine whether disciplinary action will be imposed and other
personnel actions which involve review of the employee's current and past performance.
55
AGENDA rrEM NO.
J
MEMORANDUM
TO:City Manager
FROM:Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:Final Plat
PROJECT:Beth Heights Fifth Addition
LOCATION:Beth Court, west of Ferndale Street
DATE:January 17, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council
Date -
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Mr. Ray Lemmons is requesting that the city council approve the Beth Heights Fifth Addition final
plat. Mr. Lemmons represents the property owners. This final plat is the fifth (and final) phase of
the Beth Heights development, and would create seven lots for houses. This plat is on Beth
Court, west of Ferndale Street and north of Linwood Avenue. (See the maps on pages 3 - 5.)
BACKGROUND
On June 12, 1989, the city council approved the Beth Heights preliminary plat subject to nine
conditions. (See the preliminary plat on page 6.)
On June 11, 1990, the council approved a one -year time extension and revised the June 12,
1989 conditions.
On June 24, 1991, the council approved another one -year time extension and again revised the
conditions.
On June 22, 1992, the council approved a one -year time extension subject to the June 24, 1991
conditions. The council granted this extension since the plat was dependent on the city
completing the Sterling Street construction to Linwood Avenue.
On August 24, 1992, the city awarded the contract for the Sterling Street improvement project.
The contractor started work on this project in the fall of 1992 and finished the project in 1993.
On September 27, 1993, the council approved a one -year time extension and changes to the plat
conditions. The council also approved a city code variation to reduce the required street width
from 32 feet to 28 feet. (See the minutes starting on page 7.)
On September 26, 1994, the council approved another one -year time extension for the plat. This
extension was subject to the September 27, 1993 conditions.
On November 14, 1994, the council approved the Beth Heights First Addition final plat. This plat
created 14 lots for houses and two outlots.
On September 25, 1995, the council approved a one -year time extension for the remainder of the
Beth Heights development. This extension was subject to the September 27, 1993 conditions of
approval.
On October 9, 1995, the council approved the Beth Heights Second Addition final plat. This plat
created 18 lots for houses on Hillwood Drive and Oakridge Court, east of Sterling Street.
On September 23, 1996, the council approved a one -year time extension for the remainder of the
Beth Heights development. This extension was subject to the September 27, 1993 conditions of
approval.
On September 13, 1999, the council approved the Beth Heights Third Addition final plat and a
10- foot -front yard setback variance within the plat. This plat created seven lots for houses and
two outlots for future development phases. This approval was subject to the county recording the
deed restrictions and covenants required by the city.
On April 10, 2000, the council approved the Beth Heights Fourth Addition final plat and a 10 -foot-
front yard setback variance within the plat. This plat created four lots for houses on the east side
of Ferndale Street, north of Linwood Avenue. This approval was subject to the county recording
the deed restrictions and covenants required by the city.
DISCUSSION
Mr. Lemmons is progressing with this phase of the plat, including the site grading and street
construction. He has finished all the conditions the council required for final plat approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Beth Heights Fifth Addition final plat. This approval is subject to the county recording
the deed restrictions and covenants required by the city.
p:sec12- 28 /beth5fin. mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Proposed final Plat
4. Preliminary Plat
5. 9 -27 -93 Council Minutes
6. Proposed Final Plat (Separate Attachment)
Attachment 1
1. HUNTINGTON CT.
2. OAKRIDGE LA.
17
1. CURRIE CT.
2. VALLEY MEW CT.
3. LAKEWOOD CT.
D
O
F(((
Nw
Carver
LOCATION MAP 4
3
N
Attachlaent 2
5
v
ioL63" 92.2T
t
I M
s
ol POND
O&nUTLOT
c, — r
r
r
SITE poi ok74/C
ON
Ilk OUTLOT
3 A 0
QQ E"' s ?j
3
66
403
V _ F
3 I 52 .22 ismoi \ lq N
2
Het a d fa)
UnL A
ESW. 150.03 UTIL
3 ..... . ... ...
UTIL EsmT. g q (46)
MANAGE A
4 21.55S3. 31055.27
PL
S pmirrma IAV& E -.
PROPERTY LINE MAP
4
f'" I Of COMMON /1 I •.•f 11 -
4
N
mmmmmmmmm
AttachmIMt I
BEtH HEIGHtS FIFTH ADDITION
r
r °
ra -
a ` • it - • •
a. ter• 1 r• .
1
I 1
r- , 1
AC _
J 3 S • • •
a
IL • -
f
ice
1 -.
s
1 -
1
Iir• ( b s
fC681
v 1
i
1
f
f
f
b f
1
i f
e f
f
1
1
t
1
1 - - - - --
21 ' 88 -- South Line of Outlot A. BETH HEIGHTS THIRD ADDITIONSW484S" E
r r r. . i. r w r- •South Llne of SWt /4 of SE1 /4 of SCC.12.T28.R22
I
1-------------------------- ------------------------------- - - - --1
L---------------------- ----------------------- - - - - --
DENOIES 112 INCH FOUND IRON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED R.LS. 9808
At all lot corners with no prnonuments shown will be a
inchoftherec of thisplate marked R.LS.9808. r
PROPOSED FINAL PLAT
r
1
1 n I ••`
1
i, \ + lam • / / —..
r
46- \• /
p mss.
e ;/ •' :/
ro
3 i / \\
tot 9 Qom•
4
N
p`
C rr
Revised
Preliminary
Plat
of:
e
3
I
g
BETH
HEIGHTS
ADDITION
As
J._
r,' -- %'
ij' \ \
O
r /
i- \ \ \ \\ ` "'
ICS ]
led
I\
i
f / /
t! \
t /
v /
i•
71;1/ , . \`
3 /•
s:
i. / :
1
1
Iij,\,
0,
1
sc >'
CHAD
LEMMONS
r+ /
t\
l \ \
t ` \ \ ,
4
4'
174t '
O+ ; • •`
1 .
A •
l!; !
i " \ \
13
lots '
i, , , °
6(
r-- ._ _.: '\ \` - / .
r \ / \\ .
i
1 ' \ \•
N1
4 "
I ,'
I ' \ ` _ - /' ^
T ;. .\ , „ l \
t:\
I
i ._// -
1 \
i
f \ \ \\•
t
a ,
2 _ - - \
Q \ •_ -
y \
1
3
1 !
t ' ,•
I/: • .
i .. .\` \\ \ \ \ . `/` ,
1
i \ \ .
r _ ^
a
f /!
S _ _ _ \ \ \ "
i
r
1 ` ` . ` \ \\ \ \
t11
t:
t :
t ;:
v' \ \\:
1
Z-
4
1
t ` . \ ` \_ \ \ _ ' .
1 ,
f / : //.
r>;.
r :: • •
t +
S::
Y ±\ \\ . •
I ,
C , - .. .
r ” ` \ `\
LN
Developer
KENT
W.
JEFFERSON
Jefferson
Homes)
4530
Highway
61
White
Bear
lake.
Minnesota
55110
Teh
429 -
5309
g `
i
r \. ^ =
1 : - - % :/.
ti • ''
4:•. _
a / /; ,
sue' • • :::
s ::•::•:
f.
ti
f \ ,
VIA
s
1 - _
A; •':
y •.
4'. /
1•,,
t • . - `
1
1i};
E2$
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION:
O \ \
4 `
n
1
t .
1
ti'
i ....
1
J
1 .
Y.. :_/ ; •.
fi,:.\
j '\• \ ,
l/
j ,- - / . :. :•;
Ii••• ::: :: .: :•: :•::' \` \
O ( \.
1
1 - - - -- - •:.
D'`
r.•+j
is `.'_ '• .
1
w ' ;'
j71(:
it6 :;: ':•.. ;:•:;¢:•:
1 ) '•
R
P
ROT
EC - ' ' • •'""
All
of
the
Southwest
quarter
of
the
Southeast
quarter
of
T
E
D :
5 ..:::: '
fei}
rr•:•:.
41L;!
ll::r:.•:
1
r
t
r .> •:.•:: :.:•::•::::::::;:;:::•::.:•.•.
Count
D
N / /
1
S • ?:;:
r •,_,•,
zr : _ ..... .. ..
Section
12.
Township
28.
Range
22,
Ramsey
y.
Minnesota.
t
f , •:..:.; _ _ =\
TECTED
WE
TLAND
AND
1
R
PRO
ilk / - \ \\ ;
r•
j •• // /
AA
1040:
QtOA/ - \ `\ \\ • •.•• , • •;, • •
ii
i •
1
1 - \
111 { '.
i
i - ' = ` , / \
h
t`\ '
1 ••• / - /'
i // '
i /
rl ;};•;
e
r'
C
41
f
r' /
i1060" - „,•,
s - -'
t:
t `
1 , . - /
ii -
i' \`!
J •":'
i /':' . - •, •
i /' //
f
1 '`
11 , •
t'
f
t'. • '' • %
t • -.
01
N
T /
11
0
q - / /
1 / /
i
r ..
i
f ;\.
t ' / \'_ ` -
I . /- -
C4' .
Sa \ `
s
1
t
1
1 +'
1 •
r
r (
c
S • / '
f /
0
Y
T
S ,
i / / /. . / / !
l1:.
r /
1 ' . ,
1 •
0
1
I'
II
i
t
I.
1j
pl
t ! ( _
t,
11 / /
1
S // - -
d : \./ :
V
0
1
1 \
E
fry
r + \
t
tS777 / / !
t
1 .-
1
it +
1!
r :
0
r / '
1 ` \,
s {,
It
1
if
7,/ / / /
r
t ! ', -
1+ \ \
h1
T.:
JO \`:- \ ,, +
f;
r , .
OAKRI
DG
LANE
r\ ,
O \
11
1
It /
4
rrc•
ri, /
L
1
wr
t - \ .
I / / . .
rrr
r ,:... '
n..^
r
r
1
f
I
11
I
rJll
1 , /
f . - / /// ,
t:
Oj• ;
r '
95
rQ •
1 / \.
I
1 /
i • •
1 ' \
30
0,
oo
rte \ . \. - / / / /
r /, / / , -. (:
1! / /
C-
s
l-
1
v \ \
O
lL `\ \`
I,! // /
l /
I
f
r
v"' ; -
r / / /
j
YE
ffr; / - •!
j /
r /,. / / / / / /
I _ _ _• >
z _. _ -
L7 \ \
f `
i . /” / /
11
D ' \
1 { . /
i • .
r / / •/ %/
I/
i __ __
3
1
1
j
I
r
O° /
T \ '
s°•:/
r
ir/
4' , /\
1,
1,1 \ \ - -
1 / - / `
1040
1040—
t - `! / / "
Y
1 }
tip`. •
S
J. /
d
1
1\
1r / ,
i •.
1 -
Ij0_ ..
Irr / ' / \
J
I1G \ \\ \
O
I /
6tC / / /,•
1 , \
1 \\
1050
1030 /
1S }
V,\\ \ _ ` -
r
sr
gt
lt
i
1 / /_`
loft
0
r - •
r .- _ ` \• ./ \ _ \ / - / '
I,
r
I / _
7 \ :
5' , \- / , / /
7 \_•_ -
r _• _` -- __/ //
f
t
I /
r - : ..:
X1050
J - '
QP ' : ' + _-• + ' \ - \/ \• -
t04s •='" _ -
IV / /
I!'
1 \
iii - _ .-
X104
i
t-'
IS ^
t / \\ '
Q
li / -
r
te .
jS.
E _ _ ``; // / •' '
d ,
1/
o
J ` _ _
r
1100
1050 '
t /
t
r7'
r
r -• _ / / / /' "
J
I ' ..... `` \ ` \ \ -
I
t \ ..
Ir ;
r
M1<•
i,
r (=
1 / ' / `
V
v '
1 •
i9'
r- `\
r - / (
1 .,
g` ^ . , / -
1
1
Cf
r
r %' -- _ \
1C % \%\ \
f
11
t
I
ldin0
r
1
s \
1 \ _ -
i ; , ,
1 ,} •• •
1 / ..\
1
t
il _ '
TYPICAL
SETBACKS
1 \,•• \ \ \ \\
i
T - -+ \ \\\ \, .
11
Ilf
Z_- ; \
1 \\
fit
Z>, \ \ \.\ `.- '
3
14 . \\ . __
t`
O , \•
1
1l \` \ \\ ( /
440'
r ^
It1 }
00
1 ,
qp
i \\ ,
r
0+ \
Q
4-
1.•'_ \ •_ `••. ' / /
tS qn•
r •
r•
r
ell"
I
II - " -`.
Apr. \)
t
11 \ \\ - + -
O` /
t
1
p '•
r
1rl ,
t
thl
1`
1ttt1
1
1 /
1 / \
1 \ \ - ? •
CO " `
O - \ \
1
P. , . •, \ • /
ir• ,
ril
1
t
tl , _ \
1 \ ; • - - - „
Q
J _ .
s _ • . , _
t •
10 `
1
1\
1 \ ^ `
1
4 `
1
3%
1
j • \
h)
l \ \ \\
1040
r
1
1 - - ,
1
t
1
1 \ \
i • -+
y1
i •
J '
r `/
1 /' /
rI /
7
1
1 \ \ _
1\ \ \, \ \ \. ` • -• -
Y
r
J \ \
i , •.
1 .. / / / /
I/ ( . `
1
11 •\^ \"__ ,
p.
1040
J, ^
Ii
Y. \ \ \ `
1 \` \ / •
r
1 ___ - ` ` -. -,' ~`` \`, /_
I` _ /•
I% ,
I.' / /
I
1 \ - ' -- • -
i '
1 `\ '_
1030_ \` \ \\ •
d _
i •
JSO
O
t \ \\
C
Q
O -, / /,/ `__
111\ \ - '• - •
h
7
1!` \ _ /\ '_ -_ .
l_._ -•__
i
i \\' \
2` +. _
r
te, / / ` \` \
sr: / /
ISII ,,,`` = ==
ji
iii ~ /
W•
ro2o = _.. \ ` ; _ -- -- '- (
y +
3 = -' - `;• _ \ \
r --
ns _= __ • /
O - - -___ -- -•"_ __" /
to
to \ ` : : \
4- _
s
I
mo.
rte. :
r._, (
r - __- _`^ =,.`= ,\ .
OT ' / `
li
r,' /
r1
10
1 -/ /- ' /
i - / / // /, / /
ro ; \\ • // ' •
w/
sr
1 \
0 :\\\.
J, /
r '
1,
i /
rl'
Ip
NN
r
t
i
J < - .- .. -_.- __ - •
a1\`
s
n .. -+ ...
5 - -
t-
i~ / ` `
cl
Z_
i'
i %
i
i• \\ .._ -.-_. ,
i, _
L_
i
NWU
WEL Zr
7
boo
2 \° ''
Scuf•
4 /
in,
c
op
S"
s
c
9i • "
s
o{
Sew. !/
T -2t",
rt'.
I2
North
Scale:
1
Inch =
100
Feet
yn;
ww
by
me
C' ."
Wee
Ply
do. .
2
wo
tr
fen ."
d
Iwt
C+
1
se{ . "
aqw- . -.
Q
two
SAW-,-
tmsf
9
W
b. ` ,
of '
3
of
MMYMt
da. -_
1o./
i &/%/
r /.
ni:
In/
t•
Ii•i! (
D.
E
CT,
QUD
SONS
I'
vo, +
LAND
SURVEYORS ,
95eo -
Lexin !
on
Ave.
ME.
Cir'
c
Pint
Uinnesold
53014
Telephone
Ri -.
sssC
H 1 1 hV1 11
3 Preliminary Plat Time Extension: Beth Heights
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report
He
a oved *^ ^r ° ^t a time e +p ^ Sion for the ggtb
b, Councilmember Zapp L
Preliminary Plat sub'ect to the followine amended conditions:
These
1) Have the City Engineer approve final constructiondrain erosion
plans shall include the grading, u
control, tree and street plans. These plans shall meet the
following conditions:
a) The grading plan shall show the depth and location of
the Williams Brothers pipelines.
b) For the sedimentation basins.:.
of
1) Each basin shall provide
a evatelevation each
storage above norm
tributary acre.
2) If the slopes on a basin are steeper than 10
horizontal to 1 vertical, the developer shall
fence the sedimentation basin. The fence shall
be five feet high, green vinyl -clad chain link
water
and shall
o
b at
er shallelandscape t sedimentation
The devel
basin site with evergreen trees.
3) 7o provide room for storing sediment, the
the
developer shall exc
belowbasintofurfeet the normal
sedimentation ,
level.
c) The developer shall iAutilities to serve the
property across Linwo odvenue
d) The erosion control plan e
District and
Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation
Sediment Control handbook.
face of
e) The streets shall be 28 feet wide hfrom
farking fon Bone
the concrete curb and gutter with P
side.
f) The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad
as
elevation and cont
reas
i
to be di sturbed
home
for
si
well as the which
construction. Housing iteslthatcontain
illustrated
desirable mature
minimize grading on s roved
0
trees and steeper slopes. Deviation from this app
the
grading plan may e ov grads g
provided that the int
complied with.
9 -27 .
7
a guarantee that the
ent with the City 9
2} Sign an agreement
develop or contractor will:
a} Complete all public improvements and meet all City
requirements*
fencingorangesafetyfg and signs at the
b} Place temporary
grading limits*
is in four locations,
install street lights onc} Have NSP ns , The exact location
at street intersections. ctio
lights shall be subject to the City
and type of 9
Engineer's approval.
the-edge -of the wetland
s shallpermanentsignsaround ed} Install p 11 mark the edge of th
areas. These sign inbufferatethereshallbenomow g,
buffer areas and shall state lawn waste.
vegetation
b i l l i n or dumpy ng ofcuttingfilling
rkin traffic - control
Cit for the cost of no pa 9
e} Pay the y
and street identification s g ns .
e an junk debr i s or tire from the wetlands and
f } Remov y
the site*
planting lan by the City
tree removal and pla 9 P
3 approval of a
a be i n nor will the City
or construction m y 9
En sneer. No grading n sneer approves thisgrovaluntiltheCityE9
give final plat app n the site. This plan must9Ianmustshowwoodlotsoihtplan, This P and specieses of trees over e 9
show the locationsion, size P move or keep*also he developer intends to re
inches i n diameter that t cottonwoods andidtoshowboxelders,
This plan does not nee t i on size and species
of trees that the developer will p l a n t as replacement trees*
d on lots 1 -5, Block 1,
restrictions shall be file to4} Deed re deck or addition attached
prohibiting construction of any linePrgtoftheWilliamsBrotherspipe
the dwelling, within 100 fee „
unless the City Council approves an exemption.
with the existing. dwelling
nt outbuildings associated r5} All prese dwelling shall be removed o
e removed. The existing d 9 if
this dwelling i s to remain i n
shall b ents on Lot ), Block 2, or
relocated to meet setback requirements lots torelirem
its resent location, theP _ setback can
sted so a 31 -foot rear yard se
the north shall be adu
be met fromom the p north lot line.P
he City for a parking lot
tlot A and Lot 1, Block 1 to t y
charges*o} Deed Ou park availabili
for Vista Hills Park, i n lieu of pa
Sterling Street. improvement
t awarding contracts for the g the7} The City constructing sanitary sewer to
or the developer constr 9project .
existing sanitary sewer in Linwoo d Avenue.
e 9
v'
8 Deed Outlot B to the City.
9 -21 -93
y
9) The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements
and overall site drainage. The City Engineer shall include any
of this grading that is not completed before final approval in
the developer's agreement.
10) The developer shall show the street names on the plat as
follows:
a) The East -West street that intersects with Sterling
Street shall be named "Hillwood Drive."
b) The cul -de -sac street that intersects with Hillwood
Drive shall be named 10akridge Lane."
c The North -South street that intersects with Linwood
Avenue shall be named "Ferndale Street."
d) The cul -de -sac street that intersects with Ferndale
Street shall be named "Beth Court."
11) Give the City wetland buffer zone easements over all lots that
are next to a wetland. This easement shall prohibit mowing,
cutting, filling or dumping within twenty feet of the wetland.
12) Show all wetland boundaries on the plat.
13) The final plat shall have drainage and utility easements along
all property lines. These easements shall be ten feet wide along
the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the
side property lines.
14) Revise the plat so there is no filling in the DNR - protected
wetland, except for the Hillwood Drive cul -de -sac. The developer
shall not fill this area unless the DNR approves a permit.
15) Revise the plat to provide sedimentation basins as required by
the DNR. Provide an outlot for each sedimentation basin. Deed
these outlots to the City.
16) Revise the plat so there is at least 10,000 square feet above
any drainage easements or the ordinary high water mark of a
wetland.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat,
the City may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final
plat.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson byes - all
9 -27 -93
C. Councilmember Zappa i the following Resoluti ^^ and moved
adoption:
93 - 09 - 131
STREET WIDTH CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION .
WHEREAS, the City Engineer requested a variation from the City Code.
WHEREAS this code variation applies to the Beth Heights development
that is north of Linwood Avenue and east of Sterling Street*
WHEREAS, the leg description for this property i
d southeasterly of the following
Except that part easterly an
a SE
Beginning n the south linene of the SW 1 /4 of th
described lines, o north 01
et west of the SE corner thereof; then
1 /4 at a point 310 feet then east
minutes, 27 seconds west for
degrees, 12 min 525 feet,
for 89.99 feet, then
with the south l i ne of said 1 /4 1 /4parallel for 13.3.80 feet, then
h 09 de rees, 12 minutes, 30 seconds eas _
Wort 9
northeasterly around a curve with a radii of 60 feet for 150.06
4 m nutes 30 seconds east for 214.38
feet, then north 45 degree, 54
4 1 4 and there terminati the SW
feet to the east li of said 1/ / .
Avenue and pipe line easement) of
1 4 of the SE 1/4 (subject to P
Section 12, Township 28, Range 22..
Maplewood City Code requires that
AS Section 29-52(a)(9) of the yWHERE
local residential streets shall be 32 feet width, , measured between faces
of curbs. .
proposingWHEREAS, the C Engineer s p p 9 28 foot - wide streets with no
parking on one side*
WHEREAS, this requires a variation of four feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows:
n on S 27, 1993. City staff
City Council held a public hearing PTheydReview and sent .notices to the
ublished a notice in the MaplewooRTheCouncil gave everyone at the hearing a
surrounding property owners. The Council also
speak and to resent written statements*
chance to spe P
considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning
Commission.
M City Council approve
W THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the pNOW9noparking on one side o
above - described variation subject to p 9 f the
the for the cost of no-parking sig
streets and the developer paying the Ci
Seconded by Coun cilmember Carlson Ayes - all
9 -27 -93
10
AGENDA ITEM NO G y
NNW
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
DATE:
City Manager
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit Review
1686 Gervais Avenue
North Saint Paul Post Office Annex
January 17, 2001
Action by Council
Date -
Endorsed
Modified - --
Rejected
INTRODUCTION
Theconditional use permit (CUP) for the property at 1686 Gervais Avenue is due for review. The
CUP is for the North Saint Paul Post Office to operate a mail distribution facility from this
location. (See the maps on pages 2 through 4 and the city council minutes starting on page 5.)
BACKGROUND
On February 28, 2000, the council approved the following for this site:
1. A comprehensive land use plan amendment from M1 (light manufacturing) to G
government facility).
2. A CUP for a public building. The city code requires a CUP for "public utility, public service
or public building uses." This approval was subject to the five conditions listed on pages 7
and 8.
3. Building, site and landscape plans.
DISCUSSION
The applicant is meeting the permit conditions. The contractor has some minor exterior site work
to finish (including landscaping and painting) this spring. The applicants contractor has agreed to
finish this work by June 1, 2001. City staff has not received any complaints about this facility.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit for the North Saint Paul Post Office Annex at 1686 Gervais
Avenue again in one year.
Kr /p: sec 10 /postoff. rev
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. February 28, 2000 City Council Minutes
Attachment 1
6:4DNAfS HEIGHTS
COUNTY ROAD
0
0 LYDIA a
I Y
N'
U
g =
W
U W
o
EE
0 0
AVE. BEAM
Y
U_
o RADAT
O
Q lulES$AS AV
Mar
UNTY
ti .W
W Markham c
Pon RAMSEY
non ' / CO
ke v : COURT
J U
y v W KOHUdAN °1
KOHLMAN AVE. CaseLakev 14=00 AVE.
LINTY ROAD y C
W WCO0 g
tHK$=" F Cl.
z W L z
z s CT • W EDGEHILL RD.
CL 3
C NO W a:
AVE. v DEMONT AVE. JWE. •
Q BROOKS AVE. tg BROOKS
EL
A Ek H
g o SEX TANT
AVE
four A.
4
EXTANT AVE.
GERVAIS A W RVAVE. g GERVAI S GE AI
v GRANDVIEW A z :ff CT.
Ya VIKING DR.
N SHERREN AVE.
Kn c lad Lake CASTLE AVE. `,
0 OF COPE AVE. COPE AVE. G •
CT .
v AVE. V _ a AVE. 0.
Z LAURIE RD.
o CO. RD. N v LAURIE RD.sn. o LAURIE ° RD. w c H
W
z
o LELAND RD. o SAND URST
Pon`
AVE. U. o W v
W Z W Z
N
JUNCTION AVE. B CO. RD. j B
C r
CL cev RKE Aye 0 BURKE AVE. o ® BURKE AVE. C~
1) CHAMBERS ST c CT $ S •P n
MO ELDR IDGE AVE. 3: i0m Clem
COURSE 6ELtONT AVE.
CoteWO CRY "a -
R GO SKILL AV E. SKILL MAN AVE. HARRIS AVE.SHO ROSEWOOD AVE. N.
LOCATION MAP 4
N
COUNTY RD.o
Q
4.
GQ' 2.1. SUMMIT CT.
2. COUNTRIMEW CIR..
3. DULUTH CT.
z
OyN,3.4. LYDIA AVE.nt&4' S
Ov-
BEAM
COUNTY ROAD
0
0 LYDIA a
I Y
N'
U
g =
W
U W
o
EE
0 0
AVE. BEAM
Y
U_
o RADAT
O
Q lulES$AS AV
Mar
UNTY
ti .W
W Markham c
Pon RAMSEY
non ' / CO
ke v : COURT
J U
y v W KOHUdAN °1
KOHLMAN AVE. CaseLakev 14=00 AVE.
LINTY ROAD y C
W WCO0 g
tHK$=" F Cl.
z W L z
z s CT • W EDGEHILL RD.
CL 3
C NO W a:
AVE. v DEMONT AVE. JWE. •
Q BROOKS AVE. tg BROOKS
EL
A Ek H
g o SEX TANT
AVE
four A.
4
EXTANT AVE.
GERVAIS A W RVAVE. g GERVAI S GE AI
v GRANDVIEW A z :ff CT.
Ya VIKING DR.
N SHERREN AVE.
Kn c lad Lake CASTLE AVE. `,
0 OF COPE AVE. COPE AVE. G •
CT .
v AVE. V _ a AVE. 0.
Z LAURIE RD.
o CO. RD. N v LAURIE RD.sn. o LAURIE ° RD. w c H
W
z
o LELAND RD. o SAND URST
Pon`
AVE. U. o W v
W Z W Z
N
JUNCTION AVE. B CO. RD. j B
C r
CL cev RKE Aye 0 BURKE AVE. o ® BURKE AVE. C~
1) CHAMBERS ST c CT $ S •P n
MO ELDR IDGE AVE. 3: i0m Clem
COURSE 6ELtONT AVE.
CoteWO CRY "a -
R GO SKILL AV E. SKILL MAN AVE. HARRIS AVE.SHO ROSEWOOD AVE. N.
LOCATION MAP 4
N
23)o+30
050 J '
07
7-
60' 90• et' er• er BI• et• 9o.b4 30
24) (X) (22)
Rcry = 2 ^ m
90' el' et' air • I.zb'
SEX TANT AVE. olho
Z n, 2 3 4 5 6 7
3 j X32) !33) 3 (35) (3G)37) "'
1 VICTORY IN CHRIST ,0
44) 1616 (4.2-) 1631 (40) 1645 (3a)
Cl'
W t tEl6=j Loma
2411
0012N
2410 a 1' 16231 1639 30
l29L.77 v' 1
f,
3 31.65' ..
3.97 v c)
1 (4 2 S
1
I
13 ?-9
MAPLEWOOD 2
BUSINESS CENTER
I
r 1
1 M
J . `
1 %Moor
I
I
1• i
1
8.
C2
i
1 ,
2,95 ac.
Attachment 2
FOUR
SEASONS
PARK
O
P
33 t• (o5
v
sLOEN=
po
0
k:l 3
tv-0— —
R 1
L .
I
Q Cu) •t 1
Cr
6 5 4
3 (u) o L
VICTORY IN CHRIST ,0
PROPOSED
o
CHURCH '^
rfr ..
LL IJS.G9
O
zaob' ° nzs
M GERVAIS AVENUE EH
13
tr 18
14 0 17 2
15 16 •N _ CoSINf1S125V3 IES
f
6S 331. GS'
4.25 ac.
32
4.3(o ac
6 5 4
3
3 2 +
PROPOSED
of
rfr ..NORTH ST. PAUL
0012N
X...POST OFFICE
ANNEX
t •i
f,
13 ?-9
Qot,ott ,
r (Jf _of
13
tr 18
14 0 17 2
15 16 •N _ CoSINf1S125V3 IES
f
oi .
1 of
N
0012N
opoo —.ft o—o4—oo
1
p
00
co
yi N
13 ?-9 13 z'. 1' —
2658.2.,r 1
J . `
In 0
1• i
1
1 ,
2,95 ac.o ' ~
o
c 3.34 is • S °A .
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
3
4
N
Attachment 3
11
SITE PLAN
4
4
N
GERVAIS AVENUE
P i" a i
NO
M'Q NAB
PO T- ' - •1R,'P4,-4ri:2Yyt •L. t__
tom. .- J1` } L•.1a'fAi i!!f,k'f;)1
ANNEX
Jf
um
r
a
tb
SITE PLAN
4
4
N
GERVAIS AVENUE
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, February 28, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -04
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2. 7:15 P.M. United States Post Office Annex Building (1686 Gervais Avenue)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
Attachment 4
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Will Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Boardmember Tim Johnson presented the Community Design Review Board report.
f. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Larry Bock, St. Paul Post Office
Chip Lindeke, Rafferty, Rafferty Tollefson Architects
g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
A Land Use Plan Amendment (M1 - G) (4 Votes)
Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution, amending the comprehensive land use plan from
M1 (light manufacturing) to G (government facility) for the proposed North St. Paul Post Office Annex at 1686
Gervais Avenue. and moved its adoption:__
RESOLUTION 00 -02 -024 .
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the United States Post Office North St. Paul applied for a change to the city's land use plan
from Ml (light manufacturing) to G (government facility) to bring the land use plan into conformance with their
proposed use as a mail distribution facility.
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property at 1686 Gervais Avenue. The legal description is:
LOTS 1 TO 24 INCLUSIVE, BRIGHTON PARK, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, TOGETHER
WITH THE VACATED ALLEY, AND VACATED NEWBURY STREET, ACCRUING THERETO BY
REASON OF THE VACATION THEREOF,
TOGETHER WITH
LOT 6, BRONSONS SUBDIVISION, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, SUBJECT TO HIGHWAY.
H. PUBLIC .HEARINGS:
WBEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
L On February 7, 2000, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city stiff published a
hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The
planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The planting commission recommended that the city council approve the land use plan change.
2. On February 28, 2000, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports
and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described change
because the proposed post office annex would comply with the commercial and industrial development policies in
the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on February 28, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
B. Conditional Use Permit
Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution, approving a conditional use permit for the North
St. Paul Post Office Annex at 1686 Gervais Avenue and moved its adoption. Approval is based on the findings
required by the code and subject to the following conditions:
RESOLUTION 00 -02 -025
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the United States Post Office North St. Paul applied for a conditional use permit tooperate a
mail distribution facility to an existing industrial/warehouse building.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the site located at 1686 Gervais Avenue. The legal description is:
LOTS 1 TO 24 INCLUSIVE, BRIGHTON PARK, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA TOGETHER
WITH THE VACATED ALLEY, AND VACATED NEWBURY STREET, ACCRUING THERETO BY
REASON OF THE VACATION THEREOF,
TOGETHER WITH
LOT 6, BRONSONS SUBDIVISION, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOT& SUBJECT TO HIGHWAY.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On February 7, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
permit.
6
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2. On February 28, 2000 the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council eveave one at thegeveryone
hearing a chance to speak and present written. statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations from the city staff and planning come fission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional
use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with
the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, P olice and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
S. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
910 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in.one year.
4. The applicant shall instruct all drivers to access and exit this site via White Bear Avenue to avoid the
residential neighborhood to the west. Mail deliveries to that neighborhood are exempted from this.
7
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS: .
S. The applicant request to the Post Master that the new facility ety named the Maplewood Post Office
Annex.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on February 28 20000
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
C. Design Approval
Councilmember Koppen ARn (date. stamRed Januml 12. 2000 th ; Rroo rth St Paul
Post OflS - Anne Used on the' findin re uir b e ` d r weer hall dot foll wi
1. Repeat this review in two years if the ci has not issued a building f r thi '8 o s project,
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall.. Provide a grading, draina e , utilitility and
erosion control plan for the city engineers approval.
3. Complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Construct a trash dumpster. enclosure for any outside trash containers. The
enclosures must be 100 percent opaque, match the color of the building and have a
1coseable gate that extends to the ground. If the trash container is not visible to the
public it does not have to be screened. ( reuirement
b. Install all landscaping as shown on the approved plan.PP P
C. Screen any new roof -top mechanical eq that would be visible from hthe homes
along Gervais Avenue. All other new roof -top units that are visible from non
residential areas must be painted to match the building. code requirement)q )
d. Provide handicap - accessible parking spaces as required b the ADA (American" '' q y s vvth
Disabilities Act),
4. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community developmentment maY
approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - allY
AGENDA rrEM NO,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
DATE:
City Manager
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit Review
2303 White Bear Avenue
Maplewood Retail Center
January 30, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council
Date - -
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected -
The conditional use permit (CUP) for the property at 2303 White Bear Avenue (Maplewood Retail
Center) is due for review. The city required the CUP for this center since it is within 350 feet of a
residential district. (See the maps on pages 2 through 4 and the city council minutes starting on
page 5.)
BACKGROUND
On February 28, 2000, the council approved the following for this site:
1. A ten -foot parking lot setback variance from the Highway 36 right -of -way. The code
requires a 15 -foot setback; the applicant proposed five feet.
2. A conditional use permit (CUP) because the building is about 200 feet from a residential
district (the center line of White Bear Avenue). The code requires a CUP for buildings in an
M1 (light manufacturing) district if they would be closer than 350 feet to a residential zone.
See the property line /zoning map on page 3.)
3. The architectural, site, signage and landscape plans.
DISCUSSION
The applicant is meeting the permit conditions. The contractor has some minor landscaping to
finish this spring. The city is holding escrow money to ensure that the applicant's contractor will
finish this work. City staff has not received any complaints about this facility.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit for the Maplewood Retail Center at 2303 White Bear Avenue
again in one year.
Kr /p: sec 11 /baIiretl.rev
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. February 28, 2000 City Council Minutes
Attachment 1
KOILLlAAN AVE
ILAAU
ff
r; M *&
9
FMD C
El 3
JEDGMI- IRD.
DEMONT AVL
NVE. i BRppttS a
Alk
ML
SEX TwAAW.oowm ME, ,. cERwvs ¢)
oRrl lam T'
SHERM
vMaNC oa.
AvE.
l AW. O
cow
N
AvE
Co.
um AVL AVL
au. u" W. uuxIE ao
Ku. urn eve.
Wcnoei AVE b e W. tm. e
E A
NMCE AML At OL"M AVLMLItoLEMZ
art ccE . r..rM ' QBE
g SIaLMAN AVE I FWlItlS AVE
C SFI`" R06EIIMOOD AVE. N.
AN AV AVL
AVE. KDRICH GoloomH . HMLOWAY
VL
El
a OOINSE
blor
tRISBE AVE.
RP LEY qWLEy AVL RI PLE
a
Lro ti IJfiS10N IWE.
HA AVE PAICE IOIE iii
LOCATION MAP
2
4
N
Attachment 2
r,.'. - .• r
f .
t'w• ` .• \. `r .. r ;. ,' h '. e: ••'L • •' t :r L •i.`':••..• '' f.n , • }(...•
r i '.BC..t • •
N 10 •s
1 OO (
167 87 i 65.87'
HIGHWAY 36
N %A
05' ES MT3OOAo
1.00 is • 2.73 ac Sa , . ..
5 6
w
r • . f , • w r w—
Cn .- ....... ......
e 'S.:i!.i tr. v ?b:rAT :f r r }kv} }:r 3% }.'i:u:3%ti . /
BALI HAI — }tiL / ,
PROPOSED '
42 t4
SITE .:•$
r. {.r.:rf. }' r. _ _SPECIALITY o3 r }:{ • r :.. .,TEo- • ..
L 3' } / . n 1 • I 2 2iENGINEERIN : r } <._ : rf •. ..:' if. ,
r • VOA ASSISTEDMcDONALD'S •' 'kf` v ` • '
LIE 37392O QPsn&/ Doc 49623f. 4 /4/66 j
r - w - WO W %sir s-it A i
FACILI
4.0 ! f COPE" WWI !
4 7.3 95 147 9 5
ZZ• p131.19 w * • 03 031II
1 W / r l — — — —
z - -LEARNINGBEAR/36'-o , b
Th
is)
TREEGOODWILLI•• _ C
k A E P — 1T/h
LARK
UM-7 T .
J '-• N d' (Z 8) p lob) o ono
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
3
i
22 1
8•t•Sb 4+
v A c ,•
o
in -ftw
N
i ( 03o Z c
50 ) 2 Z v 14
r
i3 Ali %
9 .
I p
M
LAURA27Z
4
N
Attachment 3
o
l! j
rcwtrrwrtc r-Y+ /rvo a vo.+.wr Mow a
crass+ t scats+ tAStMfVT ii nac or.r i I i'. 9WUiCTrM '
COPE AVE.j
I ::, . c u yr• rx ,? ° .
i a nurW rraacx
rxw.
a
SITE PLAN
4
4
N
S MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, February 28 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Buildingg
Meeting No. 00 -04
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
3. 7:30 P.M. Maplewood Retail Center (2305 White Bear Avenue)
Attachment 4
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Will Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Boardmember Tim Johnson presented the Community Design Review Board report.
f. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, allin for rggproponents or opponents. Thefollowingpersonwasheard:
Peter. Hilger, Portfolio Design Services, representing ReliancePS Development
g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
A. Parking Lot Setback Variance
Councilmember Allenspach introduced the followin Resolution •a provm a ten -foot parlunQ lot setbackvanancefortheroosedwlalewoodRetailSiteat2305WhiteBea •Bear Avenue and moved for its ado tion:
RESOLUTION 00 -02 -026
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Reliance Development Company LL •P p y P applied for a parking lot setback variance from thezoningcode.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to roe at 23 05 White B description • .P P rty ear Avenue. The legal is.
Parcel 1: Tract E. except the West 263 feet as measured a 't right angles to the West line of said Tract E andexceptthatpartofTractEcontainedinthefollowingescribedtract: '•g act. Begiruung at a point on the West line ofsaidTractE. distant 104.81 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof, thence South 00 00 00 East, assumedbearing, along said West line, 21.33 feet; thence South 84 23 47 East, 245.55 feet, thence South 80 58 04122.63 feet, to the right of way line of Trunk Highway No. 3 6gy as now located and established; thence North47West, along sai nght of way line 102.02 feet; then •Y thence South 89 08 00 West, along said right of waline290.31 feet to the point of beginning; in ReRegistered y
g ed Land Survey No. 258.
5
I
Parcel 2: That part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, Ramse
County, Minnesota, described as: Commencing at a point 295.90 feet North of the South line of the Northwest
1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township g29, Range 22 and 289.28 feet East of the West line of said
Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section; thence North parallel with the West line of the said
Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 261.71 feet; thence East P arallel with the South fine of the
said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 141.37 feet; thence South parallel with - the West line of
the said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 107.61 feet; thence East parallel with the South line
of the said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 530.45 feet to the Westerly line of the White Bear
Road; .thence Southwesterly along the Westerly line of the White Bear Road to a Point which is 295.90 feet
North (measured at right angles) from the South line of the said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said
Section; thence West parallel with the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section
510.60 feet to the place of beginning.
EXCEPT that part thereof lying within the following described tract: Beginning. at a point , on the West line ofggP
Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 258, distant 104.81 feet South of the Northwest corner of said Tract E
thence South 00 ° 00'00" East, assumed bearing, along the West line of said Tract E, 21.33 feet; thence South
84 ° 23'47" East, 245.55 feet; thence South 80 ° 5 8'04 ", 122.63 feet, to the right of way line of Trunk Hi wa.g Y Y
No. 3 6 as now located and established; thence North 47 ° 29'01 " West along said right of way line, 102.02 feet;
thence South 89 ° 08'00" West along said right of way line, 290.31 feet to the . oint of beginning,P g
WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c)(5)(a) of the zoning code requires a 15 -foot parking lot setback from street
right -of -way.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a five -foot parking lot setback.
WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 10 feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On February 7, 2000 the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
variance.
2. On February 8, 2000 the community design review board recommended that the city council approve
this variance.
3. The city council held a public hearing on February 28, 2000. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding properly owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described variance as
recommended by the city staff that would allow a ten -foot arkin lot encroachment into the normally-requiredPg
15 -foot setback area for the following reasons:
1. The proposed five- foot -wide green strip would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance in
combination with the wide highway boulevard. The highway right -of -way ranges in width from 52
feet to 100 feet adjacent to the proposed north/northeast lot line. With the proposed five feet of
setback, there would be 57 feet to 105 feet of reen space to the shoulder of the highway off . ramgPgY P
This is well over the typical green strip width between a parking lot and a street which is 25 to 30
6
feet (15 feet of setback and 10 to 15 feet of boulevard).
2. The parking lot setbacks proposed are substantially better than the existing ones. Currently the Bali
Hai parking lot is at the lot line, and in areas, extends into the right -of- way. The applicant's planp
would improve this current situation.
3. Complying with the code would cause the developer undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the property. The site is difficult to fit a development since it has three street frontages
and has an irregular shape.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on February 28, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes all
B. Conditional Use Permit
Councilmember Allenspach introduced the following Resolution. appr_ov_in_,_ a conditional use permit for a
building in a M -1 -(light manufacturin district at 2305 White Bear Avenue to be closer than 350 feet to a
residential district (the orouosed building would be 200 feet from the nearest residential district and moved for
its ado tion. The city bases the approval on the findin s required by code and is subiect to the followin
conditions:
RESOLUTION 00 -02 -027
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
VaMREAS, Reliance Development Company LLP applied for a conditional use permit to construct a
building closer than 350 feet to a residential zoning district.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property at 2"' "5 White Bear Avenue. The legal description is:
Parcel 1: Tract E. except the West 263 feet, as measured at right angles to the West line of said Tract E, and
except that part of Tract E contained in the following described tract: Beginning at a P oint on the 'West line of
said -Tract E. distant 104.81 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 00 ° 00'00" East, assumed
bearing, along said West line, 21.33 feet; thence South 84 °23'47" East 245.55 feet; thence South 80 °58'04"
122.63 feet, to the right of way line of Trunk Highway No. 36 as now located and established; thence North
47 °29'01" West, along said right of way line, 102.02 feet; thence South 89 °08'00" West along aid right of waggY
line 290.31 feet to the point of beginning; in Registered Land Survey No. 258.
Parcel 2: That part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 9, Range 22, RamseyPgY
County, Minnesota, described as: Commencing at a point 295.90 feet North of the South line of the Northwest
1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township g29, Range 22 and 289.28 feet East of the West line of said
Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section; thence North P arallel with the West line of the said
Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 261.71 feet; thence East p arallel with the South line of the
said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 141.37 feet; thence South parallel with the West line ofP
the said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 107.61 feet; thence East parallel with the South lineP
of the said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 530.45 feet to the Westerly line of the White Bear
Road; thence Southwesterly along the Westerly line of the White Bear Road to a P oint which is 295.90 feet
7
North (measured at right angles) from the South line of the said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said
Section; thence West pazallel with the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section
S 10.60 feet to the place of beginning.
EXCEPT that part thereof lying within the following described tract: Beginning at a point on the West line of
Tract E. Registered Land Survey No. 258, distant 104.81 feet South of the Northwest corner of said Tract E;
thence South 00 °00'00" East, assumed bearing, along the West line of said Tract E. 21.33 feet; thence South
84 ° 23'47" East, 245.55 feet; thence South 80 ° 58'04 ", 122.63 feet, to the right of way line of Trunk M hwagY
No. 36 as now located and established; thence North 47 °29'01" West along said right of way line, 102.02 feet;
thence South 89 °08'00" West along said right of way line, 290.31 feet to the point of beginning.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On February 7, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the cit ouncil approve this permit.tY PP P
2. On February 28, 2000, the city council held a ublic hearing. The city staff paperpublishedanoticeinthePgYPP
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city
staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use
permit based on the building and site plans. The city approves this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the
city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4.- The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, ee- or methods of operation that would
be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of
excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air ollutio drainage, runoff, vibration,.P ag n,-
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or ro osed streets.P P
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the
development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1
All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit
shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant shall install the landscaping as shown on the plan approved by the community design review
board at their meeting of February 22, 20000
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on February 28, 20000
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
C. Design Approval
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the plans date- stamped Janu= 7, 2000, for he ,proped
Maplewood Retail Site at 2305 VvNte Bear Avenue based on the. findingsrequired by the code. A.poroval is
ubi ect to the applicant comply, ina with the following conditions:
L Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion
control plans to the city engineer for approval.
3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Install a handicap- parking sign for each handicap - parking space.
b. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter all around the ; - arking lot and driveways.
C. Paint the rooftop mechanical equipment to match the building color if the units are visible.
code requirement)
d. Construct the trash dumpster enclosure using the same materials and color as the building.
This enclosure shall have a 100 percent opaque gate.
e. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas except for the planted
areas by the wetland behind the building. (code requirement)
f. Provide site - security lighting as required by the code. The light source, including the lens
covering the bulb, shall be concealed so not to cause an nuisance to drivers or ng
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The
9
amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. An unfinishedAnys landscaping
ishallbecompletedbyJune1f the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within six
weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.P P g
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approveminorchanges.
6. The three -color design of the awnings and tubular -steel detailing on the building shall be as shown
on the plans and shall not change.
7. The landscape plan shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The applicant shall replace the four Ash Trees on the south side if they annot be saved an dey
replace the two relocated evergreens on the ate Bear Avenue side if the do not survive.Y
Tree sizes shall comply. with the code. The applicant shall not remove an tree or, plantYP
growth on public right -of -way since these trees were shown as PPlantinsontheapproved
landscape plan.
P g .
b The applicant shall resod any disturbed right-of-way.Y
C. The applicant shall install an in- ground lawn irrigation system in all landscaped areas.
8. The sign plan criteria shall be as follows:
a. Each tenant can have up to a 3 6- inch -tall wall sign on their store front on the main sig fascia
area. Tenant signs on the tower shall not exceed 48 inches in height.
b In addition to a 36-inch-tall sign on the front of the building Tenants in a comer cangPhavea36 -inch -tall sign on the side elevation. Side elevation sig can only be laced overYP
doors, windows or towers of that tenants space.
C. Wall signs are not required to be on raceways.
d. Tenant identification signs are not allowed on the back of the building.g
e. The pylon sign near Highway 36 shall not exceed 36 feet in height as measured from the base
of the sign.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
10
AGENDA ITEM N"U
Action by Council
MEMORANDUM
Date
Endorsed
TO: City Manager Modified
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Assistant Community Development Director Rejected
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Extension — Woodlynn Heights Townhomes Number
Seven
LOCATION: West of 2175 Woodlynn Avenue
DATE: February 1, 2001
INTRODUCTION
On February 14, 2000, the city council approved the Woodlynn Heights Townhomes Number
Seven preliminary plat for Patrick Kinney, of PJK Realty. Mr. Kinney received approval for three,
three -unit buildings. These nine units would complete the Woodlynn Heights Townhomes
development which started in 1984. Refer to the maps and drawings on pages 2-4.
BACKGROUND
February 14, 2000: In addition to approving this preliminary plat, the city council denied a front
setback variance request for this project. The city council also approved the site and
architectural plans. Refer to the minutes on pages 5-7.
DISCUSSION
The applicant has requested that the city council renew this preliminary plat. Mr. Kinney is
anticipating submitting his final plat and beginning construction this year.
The city council should renew this preliminary plat approval for review in one year to check on Mr.
Kinney's progress.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a one -year time - extension for the Woodlynn Heights Townhomes Number Seven
preliminary plat. This time extension shall be subject to the February 14, 2000 conditions of
approval.
p:sec2n/w'd lyn #7. rev
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Minutes dated February 14, 2000
Attachment 1
i
WHI TE BEAR LUKE
mob :•
s I'
LMAN AV
CMRDn23loy
122W
NORTH SAINT PAUL
j
Q
LOCATION MAP
4
4
N
Z
IkZj
I
D9 3
Attachment 2
411 `
3 - COUNTY ROAD D - -
43.63• 1 a
13.30 ac.
10o
1 O r
V ,% C 1 3
it
t
1 1
i 1
1 9} ,f
Woot A T E R 24 0 inIIoN
W-jtoe::,::: , , o
N HEIGHTS' 1 (s4) ` N tWOODLYN •(c7 $
i 174 ' 4 •a s 6 7 H s
3 4
c oT W
D 00 : ' 1 0 H Es
f S
Am aim
NO.7
Co3 A +,N .4 N 0.21• N O N .10.3 ON0.6 o N0.5 -. _
E!• P&-A PY FOR DCTA 1 LS
Ffy L. 1 1,11,4 lff r"% vENIFEENE0s - 6 ir L. wr A
94 41' tic 110• tic* 110' Ito' 1 O • Z / LO
0 .3048 66) .4e •
o ? 1 D O a o ti
2144 2154. 2164 2172 t- p ' Imo o ' .° Oz) '2184; 2196, 2206 3 v o 3045
0 30 r4 ( .5) o
4 ( • ! (- 15 36 17 t 21 .22
r •
o • '
3 in W° - t 4 in
1.21 ac. .
97a .. r 14 200 c
9
O. AI '' 1Kl (f.0 a) • (11) 3 14 1 1 2
12 (
7.) %
to
2 fl 13 70 310 (t5) 210
1O i1t
ILW }
C
11 1 o • -- T - - -L '
il •i? o Dsc3 tOtit
00 - -- - - - ' -- Da .e"MOis19 Doc.' ±oLnt3 4 1ea b
i • ,
033 a LYDIA AVENUE'•o' -• • , •oOD.c' )70t,!! '1•t2•ir'f " Dec.ito3fiC •1 ?•90 f T
0 1 iO.ir' IoS Otr.s' 100• IOi.t' p' p SOS' •' nor' . 30 100• • ioo • 3
N O O M ,+ 1 d h A 01-1 .M 4 7 -4 M}1.. 1_ 2 1 2 _ 3 ?
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
3
4
N
in
boo•Ito •I so• eo•eo• too • 3
34 &C. % I%4t &C.It 41 ac. .stac
M Mai. '
K (5 N Cssac.
Ito
1: 10
sso
Ia
s4o 030
to to p o
10o
1 O r
V ,% C 1 3
it
t
1 1
i 1
1 9} ,f
Woot A T E R 24 0 inIIoN
W-jtoe::,::: , , o
N HEIGHTS' 1 (s4) ` N tWOODLYN •(c7 $
i 174 ' 4 •a s 6 7 H s
3 4
c oT W
D 00 : ' 1 0 H Es
f S
Am aim
NO.7
Co3 A +,N .4 N 0.21• N O N .10.3 ON0.6 o N0.5 -. _
E!• P&-A PY FOR DCTA 1 LS
Ffy L. 1 1,11,4 lff r"% vENIFEENE0s - 6 ir L. wr A
94 41' tic 110• tic* 110' Ito' 1 O • Z / LO
0 .3048 66) .4e •
o ? 1 D O a o ti
2144 2154. 2164 2172 t- p ' Imo o ' .° Oz) '2184; 2196, 2206 3 v o 3045
0 30 r4 ( .5) o
4 ( • ! (- 15 36 17 t 21 .22
r •
o • '
3 in W° - t 4 in
1.21 ac. .
97a .. r 14 200 c
9
O. AI '' 1Kl (f.0 a) • (11) 3 14 1 1 2
12 (
7.) %
to
2 fl 13 70 310 (t5) 210
1O i1t
ILW }
C
11 1 o • -- T - - -L '
il •i? o Dsc3 tOtit
00 - -- - - - ' -- Da .e"MOis19 Doc.' ±oLnt3 4 1ea b
i • ,
033 a LYDIA AVENUE'•o' -• • , •oOD.c' )70t,!! '1•t2•ir'f " Dec.ito3fiC •1 ?•90 f T
0 1 iO.ir' IoS Otr.s' 100• IOi.t' p' p SOS' •' nor' . 30 100• • ioo • 3
N O O M ,+ 1 d h A 01-1 .M 4 7 -4 M}1.. 1_ 2 1 2 _ 3 ?
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
3
4
N
Attachment 3
PRELIMINARY PLAT Y
EROSION CONT?Oi NO UTILITY PLAN
0(nC)L*YoNN HE 1 0 NHOME Now I
r-om. P,ar wway
18 L9ee i4Vrxs ,
Maphowo o ._MN Wol ;
Phors: '1d -111 •
x N7.74
x 99&91 x waN r 999.11rwsss
R 96l,t9 +I 970.14 x "M
9al.n
3,29. 1xs9a«
1«.Sl N89`46'00" W '
9993.
i H JO 40 90 30 40 40 so.x i7w 1 30 -
sN 96171
do
1
991.11 r K7.9J 9u.9 ri - '-mow w170
R\ r w9N t
NLl7
1 /1 i
K9.N ik ,! ,1
S 1 `• X no,"
UL91 (0Ir9. 9wraX 9aiw 99.1.« 961.79 ' •; .
sNEaeme/lt Ooc. No. f13706 -' x 9633 ••
x 1a9W s7aas x. w7.9s '•
2 3; 4 5 ' 6. ,. j NSi° 8 «9 9
8.981 sq.ft. 6.690 sq.tt. 8,924 sq.1t. : 8.920 sq.it. 6;690 sgfl 9.920.sq.ft. 8.020 sq.ft. 6.690 sq.fl. 8.632 sgtt
O
33
t
999.93 x ss9.0
x "7.M
u7.
E.W.a Ir
SITE PLAN
4
li
N
O
ON
o O
s
MW
SITE PLAN
4
li
N
O
ON
oO
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL Attachment 4
7:00 P.M., Monday, February 14, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -03
2. 7:10 P.M. Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 7 (West of 2175 Woodlynn Avenue)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Paul Mueller presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Boardmember Matt Ledvina presented the Community Design Review Board report.
f. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
1. Mark Leigh, co- applicant, 25766 Loften Avenue, Chisago City
2. Patrick Kinney, applicant
3. Dorothy Arko, 2181 Woodlynn Avenue
g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
1. Preliminary Plat
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the preliminaryplat date- stamped December 3, 1999 for the
proposed Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 7. subject to the applicant complying with the following
conditions:
I.* Obtaining the city engineer's approval of the final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall include grading, utility, drainage and erosion control plans. The plans shall meet the following
conditions:
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code.
b. The grading plan shall:
1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site.
The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat.
2) Include contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
3) Show all proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 on the proposed construction plans. The
city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any
slopes steeper than 3:1.
2. Paying for costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction plans.
3. Signing a developer's agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or
contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all
city requirements.
b. * Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
C. Provide five- foot -wide drainage and utility easements along each side lot line between
5
buildings and along the west and east lot lines of this addition.
d. Extend the five- foot -wide concrete sidewalk from its current location to the west lot line of
this townhouse addition.
e. Provide for the repair of Woodlynn Avenue (street and boulevard) after the developer
connects to the public utilities and builds the sidewalk.
4. If the developer decides to final plat the preliminary plat, the director of community development
may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
5. * Submitting the homeowner's association bylaws and rules to the Director of Community
Development. These are to assure that there will be one responsible art for the maintenance of thepY
private utilities, driveways and structure.
6. * Providing a written statement from NSP and Amoco Oil Company which allows the grading in the
easement that the developer proposes.
The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final
plat.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
2. Front Setback Variance
Councilmember Koppen moved to deny a variance Resolution, den ing a seven -foot setback variance for
Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 7. The Council is denying the variance request because there is no unique
circumstances or hardships to the propertv. The buildinq and parking can be constructed and meet the required
setbacks.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
3. Design Approval
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the plans date- stamped December 3, 1999 for Wo dl nn Heights
Townhomes No. 7 based on the findin s required by the code.. The develo er Patrick Kinngy shall do the
following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. Before getting a building permit the applicant shall:
a. Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval.
b. Submit a revised landscape plan to staff for approval which incorporates the followin g
details:
C
1) Seven spruce trees, two clumps of birch trees and six low- growing shrubs in the front
yards on each side of the entrance driveways for each three -plex.
2) The spruce trees must be at least six feet tall and the birch at least 2 '/Z inches in
caliper, balled and burlapped.
3) The plantings proposed around the front of the units shown on the landscape plan
date - stamped December 3, 1999, shall remain on the plan.
4) In addition to the above, all front side and rear yard areas shall be sodded (except for
mulched and edged planting beds and the area within the NSP easement) and an in-
ground lawn irrigation system shall be installed for all landscape areas (code
requirement).
5) No landscaping shall take place in the boulevard and the boulevard shall be restored
with sod.
C. Stake the NSP easement line and the front and side lot lines with survey irons.
d. Revise the site plan to increase the driveway turnaround setback from the east lot line to five
feet (code requirement).
e. Present a color scheme to staff for approval for each building.
3. Complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. Sod all landscaped areas except for the area within
the NSP easement which may be seeded.
C. Install an automatic in ground irrigation system.
d. Extension of the five- foot -wide concrete sidewalk to the west lot line of this development.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow te occupancy ifyYprYu _p Y
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The
amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. An finished landscapingpgyunfinished
shall be completed by June 1 f the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within six
weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community devel maypy approve
minor changes.
Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Y Ayes - Mayor Cardinal and Councilmembers
Koppen and Collins
7
AGENDA ITEM No..k
MEMORANDUM Action by Council
TO: City Manager Date
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Assistant Community Development Director Endorsed
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Renewal — Woodland Hills Church Modified
LOCATION: 1740 Van Dyke Street and 1847 Larpenteur Avenue Rejected
DATE: February 1, 2001
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit (CUP) for Woodland Hills Church is due for review. This CUP
allowed the church in the former Builder's Square building. This CUP also included the
Maplewood Plaza Theatre site. Woodland Hills has been renovating the building- interior,
landscaping the site and improving the parking lot. They are in the process of adding two
vestibules on the front of the building. Refer to the maps on pages 2-4.
CODE REQUIREMENT
Section 36 -444 states all CUPs shall be reviewed by the city council within one year of the date
of initial approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may grant up to one
one -year extension of the permit if just cause is shown.
BACKGROUND
January 10, 2000: The city council approved this CUP, approved a comprehensive land use plan
amendment from BC (business commercial) to C (church) and amended the liquor license
requirements to exempt the 100 -foot spacing requirement for churches from on -sale /off -sale
liquor establishments in instances where the liquor store was in operation before the church
entered the neighborhood. The CUP was subject to the conditions on page 5.
DISCUSSION
The applicant has shown substantial progress with their building and site remodeling. The city
council should review this permit in one year to check their progress. Once all the proposed work
is completed the council may consider waiving future CUP reviews.
RECOMMENDATION
The, council should review the conditional use permit for Woodland Hills Church in one year to
check on the progress of their proposed construction.
p:sec141woodland. rev
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. CUP Motion dated January 10, 2000
Attacnment 1
19
o '
O
3
0 W rkhom
We P
KOHLMAN AVE
Z Mi
1
W
V
W
1D C
y 10
Z W
OW U
Z
W
W
DEMONT AVE.
6ROOKS • 8OOK$AVE. Rn n
SEX TANT Z
AVE.
0
AVE. GERVAIS
v GRANDI/IEW AVE. z
YVIKINGOR.
SHERREN AVE.
A k BEAM - i.rs • :.
RAD
PAUSEY w
counr • • cc NORTH
COURT m
KOHLMAN o
o AVE. W Loki
l
CJ •
O
Vf *.
F 10.0 e.
EDGEHIL.L RD.O •.
m W
O cc
EL
AVM . .
GERVAIS GERMS AVE. •••.
CT. •.
CAME A',D
GAbILE AvE. / O
od Lake Vi. -• ZCOPE --- - AVE. COPE AVE.
AVE LARK AVE. iii •
c °' LAURIE •. RD.
LAURIE RD. h.r od0 LAURIE ° RD. W t
W
r Z a 17(
SAM URST
r `"`
AVE. o cd 0 G '~
z W < ri
a 8 CO. R0. B
4KE AVE. BURKE AVE. o BURKE AVE. . • : .
o
EL.DR IDLE AVE. W .toM or.
64 , • ..
BELMONT AVE 0 .
CRF G' ii.o : . .
AV E• :., •SKILL MAN AVE. HARRIS - AVE. w
ROSEWOOD AVE. N.
COUNTY
t
AN AV. Q ROS O
NU SNVC AIVD : oRc R p E -
AVE. S. F' ROtJ NC
cr_
CL
AIR G S
r wO
AVE ALDRICH GOODRICH O. • ••. ••• ... • . • • • • •.
W GOLF HOLLOWAY
to n } COURSE Jv - O
W o cR AVE. ARENA W Q`
1- U mUMERAVE.
o
SUM
ul N o h
Gmadifals0E. cicn
v
w
zl o RIP AVE. RI PLEY
7- o
3
W MIahId O
o %
4 `Ot` lake o KINGST AVE OR
S HU1 AVM
y
W IVICE A °
Y WJ
64
a CD
s . .. . s
LOCATION MAP
2
4
N
a
I
090
35 61
r
GOODRICH
GOLF
COU
JI:
i
GOLF DOME
047 )j00
f GOODRICH PARK
o
50 is 44515
V
SO. CHINA ISLANt
13 13
I 6A 2 3 4 S f 6
4 + PERKINS - Ir
o ••; Q, . 28 ?. 7 26 25 24 23
Ln 13
Wo
c • —C1 I
o
f .,5 v KING ST0
1
6
0 11. o '
0 1s ••47 46:
1' N
t 4 .• / 10 •,• r 4 5 6
As } I
t 8 :3 - WOODLAND HILLS 2 24 23
SA ; 103. 7CHURCH o s,c)
41.16 ' tot PR IC E
h
C
i IG G35 4 F
I 6 tec
S 15 8o O S ..
t ^ h Ica 3 ,.' (20) oo t CIO -
8
o
a
o _ - zoos u f 110 O 50 020 030
2.3C o o °_ 5% Sit 51
12 04)0 o2o
soPARTYTIMEo , -- - - t so - -
1 ; lG) I 0 to a o o
d ,t,- C ^i OLIQUORS .w 1 N
PLAZA THEATER .of 4 110 ,
ss
r ~ - N - - - • L - - - - -
f v
PROPERTY LINE 1 ZONING MAP
3
t
Attachment 3
ss
MM
III pill IN I Illullill-111111 11 lips I 1111111
it7 prill It OUTDOOR
PLAY
i
114 TER
MANS N
fill
IlL .,.. PHASEI v
Aj
SITE PLAN
4 N
PHASE 1
W
PHASE 2
t
OCCUPIED AREA 67,875 S.F.146 S.F.
Z
1
W
2
PARKING REQUIRED 350 500
W
TM z
1,033
a
1 CA:
g
i
A
SITE PLAN
4 N
PHASE 1 INTERIM PHASE 2
t
OCCUPIED AREA 67,875 S.F.109,035 S.F.146 S.F.
SANCTUARY SIZE 1 2,000 2
PARKING REQUIRED 350 500 625
PARKING PROVIDED 461 724 1,033
SITE PLAN
4 N
Attachment 4
the cites comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use wound not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air ollution
drainag water runoff, P '
g , ff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate on minimal vehicular trafficraffc on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services including streets,, 'g reels, police and .fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for P ublic facilities or services°
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of communi
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one ear of council approval or theYpp permitshallbecomenullandvoid. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant shall do the following immediately ith the Phase 1 improvements :Y overlay and restnpe
the panting lot on the west side of the building, patch pot holes in the parking lot on the remainder of
the site, remove all litter, damaged items and debris, remove the wooden fence and restore the
grass.
5. The l PPandscapeplanshallbesubmittedtothecommunitydesignreviewboardforap before anylandscapingisadded.
6. Plans for any changes to the building exterior, other than painting or repairs, shall be submitted to the
community design review board for review and approval.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on January 10, 2000.
5
i
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: AT &T Wireless Services Lease Agreement
DATE: February 5, 2001
Action by Council
Date
indorsed
Modred
Rejected
Attached is a letter from AT&T's site acquisition consultant requesting the city's consent
to the lease agreement between AT &T Wireless Services and St. Paul Regional Water
Services. The lease agreement was approved_ by the Board of Water Commissioners
and AT &T on November 14, 2000. A copy of the full lease agreement is available in
the Department of Public Works administration files.
The agreement is to locate six panel antennas on the facade of the Stillwater Road
Water Tower. In addition, an equipment shelter will be located in the interior of the
water tower. Antennas on water towers have become common place and the proposal
here will be similar to antennas already located on that same water tower.
In addition, Maplewood will receive a portion of the revenue as part of the Transfer
Agreement between Maplewood and St. Paul Regional Water Services.
It is recommended that the city council consent to the lease agreement between
AT &T Wireless Services and St. Paul Regional Water Services.
CIVIC
Attachments
jc
9915 Briar Road, #610
Bloomington, MN 55437
Phone: (612) 802 -0452
E -mail: amydresch @siteacquisition.com
January 27, 2001
Mr. Chris Cavett
Engineering Department
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Re: Request by AT &T Wireless Services of Minnesota to be included on
February 12, 2001 City Council Agenda
AT &T Site #MI 126/Mapledale
Dear Mr. Cavett,
Please find enclosed one (1) set of site plan drawings and executed lease agreement by
the St. Paul Water Commissioners with regards to AT &T's proposed installation of a
wireless telecommunication facility at the Ferndale Water Tower. Under the Maplewood
Zoning Ordinance, collocating telecommunication equipment on an existing water tower
is considered a Permitted Use.
AT &T proposes to locate six panel antennas on the facade of the water tower. The radio
equipment shelter will be located in the interior of the water tower and shielded from
view. I look forward to working with you and the Maplewood City ouncil regardinygg
this approval request. The addition of this site will ensure uninterrupted superior digital
PCS service to the Maplewood Community.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to
contact me at (612) 802 -0452.
Sincerel ,
Amy Dresch
Leasing Manager
Enclosure
ti
A
ELEA &T Wl..ss, SER C La = CIO
Sl E N
SITE NAME. MAPLE ALE SITEi
REV. DIRECTIONS , .... .... _. , -
FROM ST. PAUL. TAKE 1— 4 %TQS AcIENIGHT V& EREXRlToAADNlTOG0 NORTH ON Iu1cKNiGHT TOSTILLWATERROAD HIVY RIGHT ONT
B W14TER TOWER ON LEFT_
SCOPE OF WORK:
VICINITY MAP SITE AooRESS:
B
B N PROPERTY OWNER:
PROJEC _ }. CONTACT PERSON:
B LOCATION ^..
I: B
S I TE —B ,
B y4j1 IATITUM --
QyZcV LONWTUDE:
ElEVAB 0 TON:
to URISOICTION:FAILS B TAX 1_D_ NUMBER:
CURRENT USE:
B H wY 5 PROPOSED USE:
B cv
ce
B SITE
B ?
z
B vA/E CHAD PEQE
B _.
1-9 sac AMY DRESC
RF JOE BECK
CON
1
LANDLORD BILL TSCHIE
SCALE: NONE
THE SIG!
wctLEDAL.E SITE -
cwITEMI -1268 AT IT
8. 0t/ ?3/01 ISSUED FOR REVIEWMLLWATERAVENUE Al S Cp ,tElri Cp RROFE5S01
A 1073,75 ISSUED FOR REWEW AND CommENT KA CP
STATE OFWOOD. MN 55119 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES OF MINNESOTA, INC. GATT2515 -24th AVENUE SOUTM No. DATE REVISOG CIK P'1iN1IEiPOUS, L+N 5405
QNE (612) 721 -1660 FAX (6 12) 721 -4770 SCALE: AS [_ NOTED DESIGNED: JSH y IcB543
I L
APT
ANTENNAS
APT
ANTENNAS
APT
ANTENNAS
D(
ONG,
APT
WHIP
ANTENNAS
FUTURE APT
I1tr1TENt+
1AS
5
SQQTH
ELEVATION
0
4
8
is
AWS
ANTENNAS;
PAINT
TO
MATCH
EXISTING
WATER
TOWER:
q
ANT.EL.=PROPOSED
AWS
13 . -
0 "
x
25' -
0"
SHELTER EXISTING
MAN
DOOR
EXISTING
j
METER
STAND
EXISTING
12'
WIDE
OVERHEAD
DOOR
2 0 JV 0 i i.
ANN,
ANTENNAS;
PAINT
TO
MATCH
EXISTING
WATER
TO
PROPOSED
Aw
T-
0"
x
25'-
SHELTER
AGENDA 1TE1VI
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
FROM: Lance Lundsten, Public Works Coordinator
SUBJECT: Surplus Property Disposal
DATE: January 24, 2001
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modred
Rejected
Declare as surplus property and authorize disposal at State auction, or sale or donation
to another governmental agency:
1.) One Roland Camm 1 Desktop signmaker, Model PCN 950
Serial Number 2H12546
This equipment has been replaced and is no longer of any use to the Public Works
Department.
LAUmeo
Agenda No.!c/
AGENDA REPORT Action by Council
To: Richard Furs gMara er Date
From: Donald Winger, Police Chief and Ste Lukin, Fire Chief )Endorsed
Subject: Budget Ad modifiedJgAdjustments
Date: January 25, 2001 Rejected
INTRODUCTION
Council approved the acceptance of several donations to the Police and Fire Departments. The
agenda reports that were submitted did not authorize the Finance Director to make the
appropriate budget adjustments and the reports referred to non - existent funds.
BACKGROUND
The donations that were received have been recorded as revenues in the General Fund. The
money cannot be spent until the Council approves as appropriation (i.e. increase in the
expenditure budget). When the appropriation is approved, a corresponding increase in the
revenue budget normally is approved.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council authorize the Finance Director to make the appropriate
budget adjustments for the donations received from the following:
10,000 from Newman Mechanical to the Fire Department for equipment
10,000 from Newman Mechanical to the Police Department for equipment
3,000 from Countryside Motors to the Police Department for equipment
AGENDA ITEM NO
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
City Manager Richard Fursman
Emergency Management Director Larry J. Cude
January 24, 2001
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Agreement to Provide Emergency Management Services to the City of
Landfall
INTRODUCTION
The City of Landfall has requested to contract with the City of Maplewood to provide emergency
management services for their City.
BACKGROUND
Late last year, the City of Landfall approached me in regards to providing emergency management
services for their City. I spoke with. our Finance Director in order to come up with a fair and
reasonable amount to charge for these services. On December 13, 2000, several Maplewood staff
including myself, attended their City Council meeting to present our proposed figures and the
services that would be provided. The Landfall City Council was agreeable to our proposal and
the attached three -year Agreement to Provide Emergency Management Services was drawn up
This agreement has been reviewed by our City Attorney, Pat Kelly.
As. you know, the City of Landfall currently contracts with Maplewood for police and fire
services, and it only seems logical for them to contract with us for emergency management
services also.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Agreement to Provide Emergency
Management Services for the Period Covering 01/01/2001-12/31/2003 for the City of Landfall.
AGENDA REPORT
LJC:ajo
attachment
Agreement to Provide Emergency Management Services Page 2
City of Maplewood and City of Landfall
V. HEADQUARTERS AND EQUIPMENT
The headquarters of personnel of Maplewood providing emergency management services in
Landfall shall be in Maplewood, and members of the general public having need to communicate
with the Maplewood Emergency Management Department on matters arising out of or involving
persons or property in Landfall may communicate directly with Maplewood emergency
management headquarters. Maplewood, under the terms of this Agreement, will provide all
communication devices, equipment, records_ or other materials and personnel necessary to the
performance of this contract, except to the extent that this contract specifically provides for the
furnishing of any part thereof by Landfall.
VI. PUBLIC INFORMATION
Both parties agree to take any or all steps necessary to inform the public of the fact that
Maplewood is providing emergency management services for Landfall. Landfall shall advise the
City of Maplewood of what information was given to the public and citizens of Landfall
concerning Maplewood's -emergency management services for Landfall.
VII. PERSONNEL, POLICIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS
All personnel used in providing emergency management services to Landfall under this Agreement
shall be and remain employees of Maplewood. The personnel policies applicable to Maplewood
Emergency Management Department employees shall apply, and in all instances, retirement and
fringe benefits shall be the responsibility of and subject to determination from time to time by
Maplewood.
The standards of performance, discipline of emergency management personnel, the methods of
providing emergency management services and other matters incidental to the performance of
emergency management services under this Agreement, including personnel to be employed, shall
be determined by the City of Maplewood.
VIII. DESIGNATION OF MAPLEWOOD EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
AS LANDFALL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
All members of the Maplewood Emergency Management Department shall be designated by
Landfall, by Council resolution, as duly appointed emergency management personnel of Landfall,
authorized to act on all emergency management matters within the limits of Landfall in the same
manner and tot he same extent as though they were employees of Landfall. Maplewood shall
provide Landfall, from time to time, with the names of the members of the Maplewood
Emergency Management Department, to permit such action to be taken by Landfall.
Agreement to Provide Emergency Management Services
City of Maplewood and City of Landfall
Page 3
IX. CHARGES BY MAPLEWOOD FOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
FOR THE FIRST YEAR
Maplewood shall charge and Landfall shall pay for emergency management services provided for
under this Agreement and hereinafter provided.
Maplewood will provide emergency management services for the period January 1, 2001 through
December 31, 2001 for the sum of $5,491.96 (Five Thousand Four Hundred Ninety -One Dollars
and Ninety -Six Cents) the first year.
X. SUBSEQUENT CONTRACT CHARGES
Charges for emergency management services for subsequent years shall be based upon the
Maplewood Emergency Management Department budget for the year contracted divided by
Maplewood population to get the per capita amount. The per capita amount will be multiplied by
Landfall's population to determine the fee for the contracted year. Such sum shall be paid
annually on or before the 15th day of January. In July of each year, Maplewood shall notify
Landfall in writing of the calculated costs for emergency management services for the following
calendar year.
M. GRANT APPLICATIONS AND USES OF AWARDS
Maplewood may, from time to time, apply for and receive grants related to the provision of
services to Landfall as identified in this Agreement. Maplewood will provide services and
equipment to Landfall pursuant to the terms of each grant. When a grant may expire, Maplewood
is no longer obligated to continue to provide the grant - funded service or equipment within the
contract charges specified in articles IX and X in this Agreement. Maplewood and Landfall may,
however, discuss the desirability and proper manner for continuation of services or equipment
beyond the terms of the grant.
XII. TERM OF AGREEMENT
This agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 2001, and shall run through December 31, 2003,
and shall be renewable for an additional three (3) -year period. This Agreement may be terminated
at such an earlier date or time as by mutual agreement of the parties. In the event of such
termination, payment shall be made to the City of Maplewood on a pro -rata basis until services
cease.
The failure of either party to this Agreement to perform its terms or obligations hereunder shall
entitle the other party to cancel this Agreement and to pursue any and all remedies available at law
or equity based upon such failures; provided, however, such cancellation or pursuit of remedy
shall be available and exercisable if and only if such failure shall not be cures prior to the
Agreement to Provide Emergency Management Services
City of Maplewood and City of Landfall
Page 4
expiration of twenty (20) days after such other party has given written notice of such failure to the
defaulting party. All written notices under this paragraph shall be deemed, satisfactorily given
when mailed, certified or registered United States Mail, postage prepaid to the address indicated
below:
to the City of Maplewood:
City of Maplewood
Attention City Manager Richard Fursman
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
to the City of Landfall:
City of Landfall
Attention City Clerk Helen Hallis
11 Forest Heights
Landfall, MN 55128
The City of Landfall identifies and holds harmless the City of Maplewood, its employees and
agents harmless against and from any and all expenses, including attorney fees, costs, judgments
and amounts paid in settlement, arising or incurred in connection with any claims, actions, suits or
proceedings, to the extent that such claim, action, suit or proceeding is based upon or results from
any act of negligence or omission of Landfall, its employees, officers or agents as a result of this
Agreement or representations made to the public hereunder.
Dispute resolution/arbitration in the event of any difference, dispute or claim arising under and
pursuant to this Agreement or as to the performance thereof by the parties, the parties agree as
follows:
a. Good faith negotiations. The party alleging such difference, dispute or claim
shall provide specific written notice of such difference, dispute or claim to the
other party. The parties hereto agree that for a sixty (60) -day period thereafter,
the parties will engage in good faith negotiations at Maplewood City Hall to take
any further action in an attempt to resolve this dispute.
b. Arbitration. In the event the parties fail to resolve their dispute following good -
faith negotiations, the difference, dispute or claim shall be submitted to an
arbitrator from City Government mutually agreed on by the parties. The location
of the arbitration shall be at the City Hall, City of Maplewood. The decision of the
arbitrator shall be final and not subject to appeal.
Agreement to Provide Emergency Management Services Page 5
City of Maplewood and City of Landfall
XIII. ORDINANCES AND STREET MAPS
Landfall shall provide Maplewood with a copy of the emergency management ordinances of
Landfall and with a copy of each amendment or new ordinance hereinafter adopted by Landfall
while this Agreement is in effect. Landfall shall provide Maplewood with a copy of the Landfall
streets layout and with an updated copy as changes are made.
XI V . AGREEMENT
It is understood that this Agreement contains the entire Agreement between Maplewood and
Landfall and that no statements, promises or inducements made by any party hereto, or officer,
agent or employee of either party hereto, which is not contained in this written Agreement shall be
valid and binding; and this Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except in writing
signed by the parties and endorsed hereon. It is expressly understood between the parties hereto,
and this understanding shall be considered in interpreting the provision of this Agreement, that
upon notice given by any party hereto, later negotiations may be undertaken for the purpose of
revising, adding to or striking any provision or provisions of this Agreement which appear
unworkable or insufficient to perfect, maintain and ensure the purpose of this Agreement and any
change of the provisions of this Agreement, after agreement between Maplewood and Landfall
shall be written and attached to this agreement as provided above and this later revision, addition
or deletion shall only apply to the provision revised, added or deleted and the remainder of this
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
The effective date of this Agreement is January 1, 2001 and its expiration date is December 31,
2003 unless renewed, terminated or altered by operation of law or by terms of this Agreement.
A- waiver by any party or any term or condition of this Agreement and any paragraph shall not be
deemed or construed to be waiver of such term or condition for the future or any subsequent
breach thereof.
This entire Agreement embodies the entire Agreement and understanding of the parties hereto
with respect to the subject matter hereof, and it supersedes all prior and contemporaneous
agreements and understandings, oral and written, relative to the subject matter of this Agreement.
Each party shall execute and deliver any and all documents and shall perform all acts reasonably
necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. And no party shall unreasonably
withhold its consent to any action which, by the terms hereof, require such consent.
XV. DATA PRACTICES
Landfall agrees to comply with the Minnesota Data Practices Act and all other State and Federal
laws relating to data privacy or confidentiality. Landfall will immediately report to Maplewood
Agreement to Provide Emergency Management Services Page 6
City of Maplewood and. City of Landfall
any requests from third parties for information relating to this Agreement. Furthermore, Landfall
agrees to promptly respond to inquiries from Maplewood concerning data requests.
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above
written:
Approved As To F. rm. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Maplewood Cit ttorney Mayor
City Manager
Approved As To Form CITY OF LANDFALL
Landfall City Attorney Mayor
Clerk
AGENDA NO.
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
City Manager
Finance Director
TRANSFERS FROM TAX INCREMENT FUNDS
January 26, 2001
PROPOSAL
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
It is proposed that the Council authorize the appropriate 2000 budget adjustments
and 2000 transfers totaling $288,200 from the Tax Increment Funds to the Debt
Service Funds.
BACKGROUND
Annually transfers are made from the Tax Increment Funds to finance
expenditures in other funds. The 2000 transfers from the Tax Increment Funds
will finance debt service costs on tax increment bonds totaling $288,200 in two
debt service funds. A breakdown by fund and comparison with the original
budget is listed on the attachment.__
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council authorize the appropriate 2000 budget
adjustments and 2000 transfers totaling $288,200 from the Tax Increment Funds
to the Debt Service Funds.
PAF1NANCE \WP\AGN \T1FTRAN.WPD
r
FILE NAME: TIFTRAN
LOCATION: C: \123R5W \MISC
DATE: 26- Jan -2001
PREPARED BY: DF
TRANSFERS FROM TAX INCREMENT FUNDS TO DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
To eliminate cash deficits)
2000 2000 2000 BUDGET CHANGES
BUDGET*RE -EST.*ACTUAL AMOUNT ACCT. NO.
OPERATING TRANSFERS IN TO DEBT SERVICE FUNDS:
Fund #326 1992 Tax Increment Bonds 166,440 166,440 224,700 58,260 326 -999 -3999
Fund #328 1993 Tax Increment Bonds 172,920 332,180 63,500 109,420) 328 -999 -3999
Total transfers 339,360 498,620 288 51,160)
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT FROM TIF FUNDS:
Fund #413 Housing District 1 -1 109,460
Fund #414 Housing District 1 -2 166,440
Fund #415 Housing District 1 -3 63,460
Total transfers 339,360
110 63,500 (45, 960) 413 -999 -4999
241 160 (6 414 -999 -4999
146,850 64,700 1 415 -999 -4999
498,620 288,200 (51,160)
PER PAFINANCE \BUDMISC \1RSF9900
FILE NAME: TI FTRAN
LOCATION C: \123R5W \MISC
DATE: 26- Jan -2001
PREPARED BY: DF
TAX INCREMENT TRANSFERS ON 12 -31 -00
Fund Name
Cash
Balance
Fund No. 12 -29 -00 Fund 412 Fund 413 Fund 414 Fund 415 Balance
1992 Tax Increment Bonds 326 224,689.67)160,000.00 64,700.00 10.33
1993 Tax Increment Bonds 328 63,490.82)63,500.00 9.18
Housing District 1 -1 413 118,737.57 63,500.00) 55,237.57
Housing District 1 -2 414.259,069.08 160,000.00) 99,069.08
Housing District 1 -3 415 157,741.45 64,700.00) 93,041.45
Total 247, 367.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247, 367.61
1992 Tax Increment Bonds - financed by
Housing District 1 -1 ends 12 -31 -2012
Housing District 1 -2 ends 12 -31 -2012
1993 Tax Increment Bonds - financed by
Housing District 1 -1 ends 12 -31 -2012
Housing District 1 -2 ends 12 -31 -2012
Housing District 1 -3 ends 12 -31 -2012
Transfers in From Adjusted
AGENDA NO. C1' 8018
AGENDA REPORT
T O:C yit Manager Action by Council
FROM:Finance Director Date
101- 102 -4160)
Endorsed -- -
RE:CARRY OVER OF 2000 APPROPRIATIONS TO 2001 Modified - --
Rejected _-
DATE:February 1,2001
1
It has been past practice to permit the carry over from one year to the next of unspent monies
for specific purposes. This involves reductions in the 2000 Budget and corresponding
increases in the 2001 Budget.
Department heads have requested the following General Fund carry overs:
2000 Acct. No.
Department Amount (2001 Acct. No.) For
City Manager's
Office 2,530 101 -102 -4630 Lateral files
101- 102 -4160)
City Clerk 22 101- 301 -4480 Re- codification of city
ordinances
City Clerk 1 101- 303 -4630 DN R equipment
Human Resource 12 101- 116 -4010 Temporary help
101- 116 -4025)
Human Resource 2 101- 116 -4360 Recruitment advertising
Human Resource 1 101- 116 -4480 Speaker cost for city -wide
training
Public Works 29 101- 501 -4490 Study to meet PCA requirements
for clean up of old city dump
Public Works 35 101- 502 -4180 Street sand, salt and crack
sealing materials
Public Works 1 101- 503 -4640 Surveying equipment
Parks and Recreation 3,070 101- 604 -4025 Artist for 12 outdoor interactive
signs at Nature Center
AGENDA REPORT
Carryover of 2000 Appropriations to 2001
February 1, 2001
Page 2
2000 Acct. No.
Department Amount 2001 Acct. No.)For
Parks and Recreation 4,615 101- 604 -4180 Seed, p lants, soil at Nature
Center
Parks and Recreation 4,540 101- 604 -4220 Fabrication of 12 outdoor
interactive signs at Nature
Center
Parks and Recreation 800 101- 604 -4720 Boundary fence at Nature
Center
Parks and Recreation 2,700 101- 604 -4600 Donations for capital outlay
Parks and Recreation 3,010 101- 605 -4160 GPS monitor and tools for
volunteers
Parks and Recreation 600 101- 605 -4220 Signs for open space sites
Parks and Recreation 5 101- 605 -4360 Publishing open space
brochure
Parks and Recreation 9 101- 605 -4480 Controlled burns at open
space sites and site analysis
work
Parks and Recreation 2 101- 605 -4690 Posts and chains at open
space entrances
Community Dev.2 101- 701 -4025 Copying update of
101- 701 -4480)Comprehensive Land Use Plan
150,280 General Fund Total
In addition to the above, carry over requests have been received for the following other funds:
2000 Acct. No.
Fund Amount (2001 Acct. No.) For
Hazardous
Materials Fund 19 204 - 112 -xxxx Development of hazmat
response team
Charitable
Gambling Fund 9 205 - 000 -4480 Development of Open Space
easement at Tri- District School
AGENDA REPORT
Carryover of 2000 Appropriations to 2001
February 1, 2001
Page 3
2000 Acct. No.
Fund Amount (2001 Acct. No.) For
Open Space Fund 24 410 - 000 -4480 Seal well at Frost and English
Fire Safety
Projects Fund 2 420 - 000 -xxxx Gladstone Fire Station and fire
suppression equipment purchases
Sewer Lift Station
No. 9 Project Fund 84 423 - 000 -4759 Amount needed to finish project
Data Processing Fund 1 703 - 118 -4160 Work station
2,823,095 Total for other funds
It is recommended that the City Council approve these carryover requests.
hu
PARNANCEMPAGMBUDGCARR
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer 1110111:44
Action by Counc
ate
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
SUBJECT: Tilsen South Neighborhood Streets, Project 00 -04
Public Hearing, Order Improvement and Approve Joint Powers Agreement
DATE: February 5, 2001
The Public Hearing for this project has been scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Monday,
February 12, 2001. Notices of the public hearing have been mailed and published.
Reference information for the public hearing has been provided as a supplement to the
council packet. The supplement includes information on the impacted properties and
the probable assessments. The city council will consider ordering the improvement
following the public hearing.
If the city council chooses to order the improvement, then they must consider the Joint
Powers Agreement between the City of Maplewood and North St. Paul. The City of
North St. Paul will hold their public hearing on March 6, 2001. The inclusion of Area D,
as defined in the feasibility study, shall be conting upon North St. Paul's approval ofgppp
the improvement and of the joint powers agreement.
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering
the improvement and approve the joint powers agreement between the cities of
Maplewood and North St. Paul.
CIVIC
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 22 day of January, 2001,
fixed a date for a council hearing on the Tilsen South Neighborhood Street
Improvements, City Project 00 -04,
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the
hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on February 12, 2001, and the
council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully
considered the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAP LEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the
feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make improvements on the Tilsen South
Neighborhood Streets, City Project 00 -04.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council
resolution adopted the 12 day of February, 2001.
3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is
hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said
improvement.
4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers
necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of
1,846,000 shall be established. The proposed financing plans is as follows:
Assessments (Maplewood) $777,000
General tax levy (Maplewood) $671,000
Sewer Utility fund (Maplewood) $43,000
North St. Paul obligation . 355, 00
1,846,000
JOINT- POWERS AGREEMENT
January 29, 2001
THIS JOINT- POWERS AGREEMENT made and entered in this day of
2001, by and between the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County,
Minnesota, and the City of North Saint Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood and the City of North .Saint Paul, pursuant to
the provision of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 471.59, are authorized to enter into
agreements to exercise jointly the governmental powers and functions each has
individually; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood and the City of North Saint Paul desire to
jointly participate in the reconstruction of water main and streets on a portion of a City
of Maplewood project referred to as: The Tilsen South Neighborhood Street
Improvements, Maplewood Project 00 -04; and
WHEREAS, the limits of the water main reconstruction is on Frederick Street and
Furness Street between Radatz Avenue and Beam Avenue, on Mapleview Avenue
between Frederick Street and McKnight Road and on Radatz Avenue between the
cities' mutual corporate limits on the west and McKnight Road on the east as described
in the feasibility study; and
WHEREAS, the limits of the shared responsibility of street reconstruction is on
Radatz Avenue between the cities' mutual corporate limits on the west and McKnight
Road on the east as described in the feasibility study; and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood and the City of North Saint Paul have
requested its consulting engineer, SEH, Inc., to prepare final plans and specifications
for the reconstruction of the Tilsen South Neighborhood Street Improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood and the City of North Saint Paul have
accepted a proposal by the consulting engineering firm of SEH, Inc., to perform contract
administration services for the design phase of the project.
AND WHEREAS, the estimated project cost will be $1,846,000.00 as shown in
the feasibility study dated January 11, 2001, as prepared by the City of Maplewood.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties hereto as
follows, to wit:
1. The cost of all utility extensions or betterment shall be paid by the respective city
following the cost estimate breakdown as shown in the feasibility report dated
January 11, 2001. Operation and maintenance of water and sanitary sewer
utility improvements is the responsibility of the respective city. Operation and
maintenance of the storm sewer system is the City of Maplewood's
responsibility. Costs for utility work shall include costs for construction and
engineering. The City of Maplewood shall pay the invoices submitted by the
contractor and the consulting engineer, and then be reimbursed by the City of
North Saint Paul for its share of the work as outlined in the feasibility study.
2. North Saint Paul shall pay Maplewood its prorated share of the project costs as
defined in the feasibility study. Payments shall be due within 30 days of
Maplewood's invoice date.
t
3. The consulting engineering firm of SEH, Inc., shall be the Project manager for
the design and bidding phases of the project. The City of Maplewood shall be
the project manager for the construction phase of the project. Final construction
decisions for utility extensions or betterment shall be made by the respective
cities. Final construction decisions for the balance of the work shall be made by
Maplewood, but not before consulting with North Saint Paul.
4. Maplewood and North Saint Paul each shall be responsible for conducting its
separate assessment proceeding with respect to its proportionate share of the
costs of the improvement, and each party thus shall bear all costs and expenses
associated with any such assessment proceeding. Each party consequently
shall defend itself in the event of an appeal of an assessment by a property
owner and bear all costs associated with the legal defense of any such appeal
including, but not limited to, attorneys', engineers', appraisers', and other
experts' fees, costs, and expenses) and the economic consequences of any
such appeal, if decided unfavorably to the party, without right of indemnity or
contribution from the other party hereto.
5. Maplewood and North Saint Paul agree to indemnify each other and hold each
other harmless from any and all claims, causes of action, lawsuits, judgments,
charges, demands, costs, and expenses, including, but not limited to, interest
involved therein and attorneys' fees and costs and expenses connected
therewith, arising out of or resulting from the failure of either party to satisfy the
provisions of this agreement or for damages caused to other parties as a result
W
of the manner in which Maplewood or North Saint Paul perform or fail to perform
duties imposed on each party by the terms of this agreement.
6. This agreement shall remain in full force and effect until terminated by mutual
agreement of Maplewood and North Saint Paul or by an independent arbitrator in
the event that there is not a neutral agreement.
7. It is agreed that, except as specifically provided hereby the execution of this
agreement, neither party relinquishes any rights or powers possessed by it,
neither party is relieved of any responsibility, duty or obligation imposed on it by
law or regulation.
8. Data Practices:
a. Maplewood and North St. Paul agree to comply with the Minnesota Data
Practices Act and all other state and federal laws relating to data privacy
or confidentiality;
b. Maplewood and North St. Paul will immediately report to each other any
requests from third parties for information relating to this Agreement; and
c. Maplewood and North St. Paul agree to promptly respond to each other's
inquiries concerning data requests.
9. Arbitration of Disputes
Any controversy claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or breach
thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the
American Arbitration Association. Judgment upon the award rendered by the
arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be
executed by their respective duly authorized representatives.
Dated
Dated
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Manager.
CITY OF NORTH SAINT PAUL
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Manager
5
AGENDA ITEM No
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION
Request
City Manager
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit - Lot Division
1101 County Road C
Donald Callahan
January 29, 2001
Action by coLlncil
Bate
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The applicant is requesting city approval of a conditional use permit to divide a 140 - foot -wide lot
into two 70 -foot wide lots. Section 36 -69 of the city code allows interior lots with widths between
60 and 75 feet in the R -1 zone with city council approval of a conditional use permit (CUP). This
request is for the property at 1101 County Road C. (See the maps on pages 8 through 11.)
Reason for the Request
Mr. Callahan is requesting this CUP for a lot split to construct two new homes. The new houses
will be on the two new lots after Mr. Callahan demolishes or removes the existing house and
garage from the property. (Refer to the survey on page 12, the site plan on page 13 and the
statement on pages 14 and 15.)
BACKGROUND
On September 12, 1988, the city council approved a conditional use permit for Mary Krause of
1281 Kohlman Avenue. The council approved this CUP so the applicant could build a single -
family home on a 66- foot -wide lot.
On September 24, 1990, the city council approved a conditional use permit for Eldon Dillon at
1373 Kohlman Avenue. This permit was for the creation of two 66- foot -wide interior lots in the
R -1 zoning district.
APPROVAL STANDARDS
Section 36-442 of the City Code gives nine standards for approval of conditional use permits.
These are listed in the resolution on pages 19 through 21.
Section 36 -69(2) of the City Code gives the following additional condition for approving new
interior lots that are between 60 and 75 feet in width:
There are at least two developed lots -of- record with the same or less width than
proposed, within 350 feet of the site on the street. Larger minimum side yard setbacks
may be required to balance the separation between structures."
DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit
This request meets the required findings for approval of a conditional use permit and for narrow -
width lots. There are six lots on County Road C within 350 feet of the site that have a width of
either 65 or 70 feet.
Shoreland District
The site is in the shoreland district of Kohlman Lake. The city code has several requirements for
placement and design of the proposed single dwellings near lakes, including this site. These
include a requirement that each lot be at least 20,000 square feet in urea. The city code defines lot
area as. "the area of a lot, excluding drainage easements, wetlands and the land below the
ordinary high water mark of public waters." Each of the proposed lots, however, would not have
20,000 square feet of buildable land outside of the wetland and lake area. Each lot would have
about 8,000 to 10,000 square feet of buildable area.
The shoreland code has a provision to deal with this situation. Section 36 -566 (b)(1)(c) of the code
says that the minimum lot requirements shall not apply to a development that is at least eighty (80)
percent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline during the summer.
As such, if the applicant could prepare and implement ascreening -plan for the two lots that show
how the new houses would be screened from the lake to meet the 80 percent requirement, then
the city could approve the lot division. (The city applied this same screening requirement to the
Rosewood Estates building on the corner of Maryland Avenue and Lakewood Drive in 1994.)
It also is important to review the purpose and intent of the shoreland code. These outline why the
city has adopted the shoreland regulations. Section 36- 561(b) of the code states the purpose and
objectives of the Shoreland District. It says "the purpose of this article is to provide specific
regulations to protect the city's shorelands. It is in the public's best interest to provide for the wise
subdivision, use and development of shorelands. To accomplish this purpose, (this code) has the
following objectives:
1) Protect, preserve and enhance the quality of surface waters.
2) Protect the natural environment and visual appeal of shorelands.
3) Protect the general health, safety and welfare of city residents."
Section 36 -573 of the city code says that "Each lot created through subdivision shall be suitable for
development with minimal alteration. The city shall not consider lots suitable for development that
would create any of the following effects:
1) Susceptibility to flooding; (2) filling of wetlands; (3) building on soils with severe
development limitations; (4) creating severe erosion potential; (5) building on steep
topography; (6) inadequate water supply or sewage treatment capabilities or (7) creating a
loss of protected wildlife habitat."
The proposed lot division can meet the above - listed objectives and the lots are suitable for
development. Having two houses on this property, if the owner properly screens them from the
lake and if the owner carefully places them on the property, should not cause any negative effects
on the lake, on the environment or on the health, safety or welfare of the citizens.
2
Molly Shodeen of the DNR also told me that any proposal to create an access to the open water in
the lake will require a DNR permit.
Wetland Ordinance
This site is next to a Class I wetland. As such, the city has several regulations about the use of
land and the placement of the structures near the wetland. Because the site is near a wetland and
a lake, I asked the staff of the Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District to comment on this
proposal. Their comments are in the letter on page 16. They recommend that the applicant not
make any impact on the wetland as it would require a lengthy review under the Wetland
Conservation Act. They also noted that since much of the buffer area had been disturbed that they
would only require the applicant to dedicate a 10- foot -wide no- disturb buffer instead the 100 -foot-
wide no- disturb buffer that the code would usually require.
House Placement
Both the shoreland code and the wetland code have language about the placement of structures
near a lake and near a wetland. Section 36 -566 (c)(1) of the code has language about the
placement, design and height of structures in the shoreland areas. Specifically, this part of the
code says that "where structures exist on the adjoining lots on both sides of a proposed building
site, the owner or builder may change the structure's setbacks without variance to meet the
adjoining structures setbacks from the ordinary high water level."
Section 9- 196(d)(1)a of the city code says that the wetland setback regulations shall not apply to
structure, vegetation and maintenance activities and practice in existence on the date this
ordinance becomes effective. (May 13, 1996.) A contractor or owner may remodel, reconstruct or
replace affected structures if the new construction does not take up more buffer land than the
structure used before the remodeling, reconstruction or replacement."
These code sections say that the applicant may line up the rear of the new houses with the rear of
the neighbor's houses and that the new construction may occur as long as it does not further
impact the wetland buffer. The applicant has not yet submitted specific site plans for the proposed
lots. It appears, however, to be enough room on the two lots to meet the setback requirements of
the shoreland code and those in the wetland regulations. To meet these requirements, and to
minimize the impact on the lake and wetland, the city should require Mr. Callahan to place the
structures as follows: the front of the new houses should have a 25 -foot front yard setback (the
front setback of the existing garage) and the rear of the houses should be no farther than 70 feet
back from the front property line. These limits will create a 45 -foot deep building pad for each
house and should preserve many of the existing trees on the property. (See the map on page 18.)
Nonconforming Buildings
Section 36 -17(b) of the city code says "the substitution of one nonconforming use for another
nonconforming use may be permitted by the city council by special (conditional) use permit,
provided that, such nonconforming use is determined by the city council to be of the same or more
restrictive nature as the original nonconforming use."
3
COMMISSION ACTION
On January 17, 2001, the planning commission recommended approval of the conditional use
permit and the proposed lot division.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution starting on page 19. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for the
property at 1101 County Road C for Donald Callahan. This permit is for the creation of two 70-
foot -wide interior lots in the R -1 zoning district. This permit shall be subject to the following
conditions:
1. All construction shall follow site plans approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes. The site plans shall meet the following
conditions:
a. The front setback for each house shall be 25 feet.
b. The rear of each house shall not be more than 70 feet from the front property line.
C. There shall be at least 20 feet of side yards for each house - at least 10 feet on
each side.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The applicant or building contractor shall provide a grading, drainage and erosion control
plan with each building permit application. These plans shall show:
a. The proposed house pad and the proposed building pad elevation and contour
information for each lot. The house pads shall be such that minimize the grading on
the lots so the builder can save as many of the existing trees on each lot as
possible.
b. Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. This shall
include the existing and proposed drainage patterns with elevations and contours
for each lot.
c. The wetland and the wetland buffer area being outside the grading limits
d. All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the
plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1.
e. All retaining walls on the plans. Any new retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a
building permit from the city.
f. No grading beyond the property boundaries without temporary grading easements
from the affected property owner(s).
4
The city engineer must approve these plans before the city will issue a building permit.
4• The applicant or building contractor providing the city a tree plan that:
a. Shall be approved by the city engineer before building emolition
or final lots g or removal, sitegradingsplitapproval.
b. Shows where the developer or builder will remove save or replace large trees.
C. Shows no tree removal beyond the approved radin and tree limigg
d. Shows the size, species and location of the replacement 'p and _screening trees.. Thedeciduoustreesshallbeatleasttwoandonehalf (2 %) inches in diameter and
shall be a mix of red and whit oaks, ash, lindens and sugar maples. TheconiferoustreesshallbeamixofAustrianineando 'p other species.
5. Before the city approves and stamps the lot division deeds, the applicant or owner shallcompletethefollowing:
a. Remove or demolish the existing house and ara a from •
li • 9 9 the property according toallapplicablecablestatedemolitionordinances. This is to ensure the owner or contractorproperlydisposesalldemolitiondebrisinalicenseddemolitionlandfill.
b. Record a wetland buffer and drains idrainageeasementoverallthepropertythat s northofthewetlandbuffereasementlineshownonthesurve
re ort. Y on page 18 of this staffp
C. Provide city staff with a screening plan for each lot. This plan is to show how theapplicantwillmeetthecoderequirementthatthenewhousesbeatleasteighty (80)percent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline of thelakeduringthesummer.
d. Prepare and record covenants with each lot that requires the property owners tokeeptherequiredscreeningoneachlot.
e. Install one permanent wetland buffer sign per. lot. These signs shall be around theedgeofthewetlandbuffereasement. These signs shall mark the edge of theeasementandshallstatethereshallbenomowing, vegetation cutting, filling,grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign design andlocationbeforethecontractorinstallsthem. The developer or contractor shall installthesesignsbeforethecityissuesbuildingpermitsinthisplat.
f• Install survey monuments along the wetland boundary.
6. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
5
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
surveyed the 15 property owners within 350 feet of the site. There were five replies. Of those,
three were for the proposal and two were against.
For
1. We have no problem with them wanting to build 2 houses in that area. (Krueger - 1094
County Road C)
2. 1 agree with the proposal but suggest and easement for the widening of "C" should the road
be upgraded. (Keefer - 2557 Highway 61)
3. See the letter from Christianson's on page 17.
Against
1. I do not want to see that lot split. It would bring more value to have a large, more
expensive -style home. If you split this property, what is going to happen when County Road
C is widened and it will be because of the traffic congestion already created. (McClellan -
1085 County Road C)
2. I would not want 2 lots made of this property being that I would not have lake view if that
were to happen. (Wood -1116 County Road C)
0
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE INFORMATION
Area: 4.24 gross acres (140 x 1318) or 2.07 gross acres for each lot (70 x 1318 )
Existing lard use: One single - family dwelling and detached garage
Surrounding land uses: single dwellings
PLANNING
Land Use and Zoning Designations: R -1 (single dwellings)
PUBLIC WORKS
Public water and sanitary sewer are available in County Road C.
Application Date
We received the application for this. request on December 8, 2000. State law requires that the city
take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a proposal. As such, city council
action is required on this proposal by February 8, 2001, unless the applicant agrees to a time
extension.
P: sec4/memo/1 10 1 ctyc. mem
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Area Map
4. Area Map
5. Site Survey
6. Site Plan (Enlarged)
7. Statement of justification from Donald Callahan date stamped 12 -08 -00
8. 12 -22 -00 letter from Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District
9. 12 -19 -00 letter from Christianson (1111 County Road C)
10. Site Plan (with staff conditions)
11. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
h
ATTACHMENT 1
VADNAiS HEIG Sli
Q oOUNtt RD. D
z
v
3 4. r
tR.tJMYHEW
3
2. COR
l . 3. DULUTH CT.
4. LYDIA AVE
BEAM AVE.
WEAM
t; 3
5T. JoHN'S rPsop -
BLVD. 3
ti i
Ego11
A
I I A
J
KOHLI+4W AVE
LA
cot) c
2 ALVARM OR PALM
r
4 OM1f OR
DR
Cf. PN' d .
AVE. 1'OR
DEWt.
3 CT VE
A t ppripNf
c Twoom AVE.
AVE.
CT. SEX TMli Z
ANi AVE AVE.
AVE >-. GERWVS
AUL
GRANOVIEW AVE
VNCMIG DR.
WRRIN AVE
Lake
K-1'
COPE
AVE
AV'
D n t1R!(
Lake / CO. < RD. i t/YJRIE RD. UURI
LAURIE CT. RDi & . Pw*
7 AVE.
JUNCTION AVE.
e 9URKE 11yE, BURKE AVE. 81JRlCE
0
ELDFWM Avst (1) CFAMeERS ST (1
EI,OR IGGE AVE
AVEBBELA1ptjT (4N E11AOffWL
LOCATION MAP
609
4
N
ATTAC' ` .1 1.'I...iY
0
1 '
1055 1071 0
4 100 ' •_ a>~t o 1
l
4c
I c
1
N
i 1 1 .4 z : . (
i
0_
1.70ac.)
ZOO
7 Inc
II
i l X
CITY OPEN SPACE o7
SITE
to ! 1
1i ' ./
Ir No Access 100• . .
O N q
Y r) A L
1
i- 'n
r05 130 (o
M
47oa • t/ A
1094 q"
1110, r' cl off
i • ' 6 1/
1
1.1 we•
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
v
4
N
40
r
F
2.950. 4.03
i
i
1
050
r i ' KOHLIVIAN LAKE
1
i
f '
i v
t
I e
61)
o
r
1
I
1
f
I N t
c
16.34 ac.
cq] 0 o
1 0
3) N
S t
E
o C . 94acPROPOSEDLOTDIVISIONa1
4 'Ul
ao
0 = N ' S
N OclJN
t 1
4 7
O
d
v
r
t mano n alc N.
V V V t 0 10 M
loe r
I ` fd
4
7)01
1
I
1
f
I N t
c
16.34 ac.
cq] 0 o
1 0
3) N
S t
E
o C . 94acPROPOSEDLOTDIVISIONa1
4 'Ul
ao
0 = N ' S
N Ocl JN
t 1
4 7
O
d
v
r
t mano n alc N.
V V V t 0 10 M
loe r
I ` fd
4
ATTACHMENT 3
r
a
KOHLMAN LAKE
I
i
CITY OPEN SPACE
N Limit on Liability: This document is not a legally Current Layers ' ; STRTXT ROADS9r ' 6;t C - recorded map or survey and is not intended to be STRUCTURES96; WATER96; HALFSECL;
LIMITSA; PARREG; LIMITSPusedasone. This map is a compilation of
records and information from various state,
1 county, and city offices, and other sources.
F.Al _ iTl 't r
10
4
N
AI IAGHMENT 4
AREA MAP 4
N
BOUNDARY SURVEY
i .
TXAT PART OF TfifB SM I14 OF TIC SE I/I
OF SEL^770N I 7f911JNSXIP 20, RUVCB 22
M
F-
17
LLJ
V
Q
ANP&~4 AOOSW/ AUAfW CVL4kf 7 s
DON CALLAHAN ry i
Ip .. l.r. 4 iM ' »I -• - tw rr eel w^ a/>? or w swr
I
I IizI I
cn I -
I
sai I
tO6j
W I
I wa
SOtoV10'E (w,,o uw •°. sL — — »
fi
M al I
ONO
a .M» •s7••
sera ••saw !
PARCEL B ; .a.,I }..•...cc
r I W
arm
a
CG
S
Id01W'10•weal
1 ••w A"
i •
s
R •su •.au III r I
VW
0 WA
PARCEL A r .Y _ ••I ....
v'we•„r seas
o •.ro..
hMJ• •. •
i
aMrIs +• ra.i
1 131&71
No1Ioa' 4
1 .•' "" !I I
w. Iw .w.wtrow.IMw•1/torws+lp••wYlp 10 S 11p41% »
I
I
Parcel A 2.07 acres
Parcel 0 207 acres !" ,
Pilot of wa 0.10 earn •. o u i at
Tot 1.24 saw ,
atiue Gorf.e.
SRI LIJ"1L DRSICRLP*'IAt/
The westerly 1.10 test of the Easterly 200 het of west 1/2 of Southwest 1/1 of Prrtic+t •
I.GfD
Southeast 1/1. SeetJon 1. Tow+Mr 2S. Rangy• 22, oeoordNls t• M• •eesraN Not The Westerly 140 feet of the EastsAy 280 feet of Mast 1/2 91 Southwest 1/4 of
I on fN and of record In the ethos of the AoOi•tM of floods of Ran soy SO1° 1 /1. Section 1, Township 29. Remo 22. according to Woo record" VW O • 1IANMOLEGRAPHICSCALEthereofonNoandofneonbthe *Moe of M• Aplstor of Deeds of Aanesy
r n
Cswntx Mbw-*"t&
s » county. Ylnneem& Eaoep thw*kvm the westerly MOO too thereof. PP
P8b1S1tD er:.r_ >tsclronn --•,
r- UTILITY POLE 9
Penv/ A 1 hereby co tlf that NN suvolL Noe or ere M•Pred fareportam ms or wWsr on FOUND IRON PIPE
ash that 1 am o rut licensed land SwvsRot t1a rfntaA mot70.00 h of the EeeleAy 200 feet or I%@ het M wMt 1/2 a direc ` -111 ^s's^ r ya under IM lows of
I sm•e r 30 R Southwest 1/4 Of Sou u Mo State of mb%n••ote. Gaited this fu dry N n,e. A& 2000.1 /1. Section /„ Township 28. Reuss 22.I ••- • •s I • -
o • •
according .4 o • SET IRON PIPEofoeWofrecordMWe *Ras of th 4tos0•.d• of Ranee Cou n .
Terrence R•lf wOach «. L.S. Rep. No.. 2W
a •
20GSl9 -Den r- I&TI
secnav .. rdp te. tat »
COCA tau AMP
w u&w
ATTACHi% 11 NT h
ti
Z40.. 0 ,
4;Q"0
O u C-11C4
i. W
0 N N
OV v
On o O
A A m 4Coqq
O -
A
CACl .
s . co
O
r
O
S
4
y
O
1
A
A
N
4
N
a
g
1091 - t
a
oDi
W
W
i
y 1111
oV
I
I
140.01
N89'31'16"E -ti n t , i w
V V V / / J h V n V v %` Sou fine of Sec. 4. Twp.29, Rge.
V
W v
SITE PLAN
ENLARGED)
13
PROPOSED LOT DIVISION
4
N
M
ATTACHMENT 7
PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR LOT SUBDIVISION AT 1101
CO, RD, C . , MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
PROPOSED USE: DIVIDE EXISTING LOT AND BUILD TWO NEW HOMES
1. The proposed use (TWO NEW HOMES) would be located,
designed, and constructed in conformity with city's Code of
Ordinances.
20 The proposed use would enhance the area, while not
changing the existing character of the surrounding area..
3. The proposed use would improve and appreciate property
values.
4. The proposed use would not involve any activity, DEC 0 8 2000
process, materials or equipment that would be dangerous,
hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to any person or propertyE C E I VED
There would be no change in the noise, water or air pollution
charters of this property. The drainage water run -off would
change very little if at all. It might be necessary to remove two
or three of the existing thirteen trees, however the vegetation
and general appearance of this property would be improved
considerably.
5. The proposed use increase vehicular traffic on
local streets, however it would be very minimal. It would not
create traffic congestion or any unsafe conditions.
6. The proposed use would blend into public facilities and
services, including streets, police and fire protection,
drainage, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. The
proposed use would have only a minimal effect on these public
services.
7. The proposed use would have little if any effect on the
costs of public facilities and services.
81 The proposed use would maximize and incorporate the
site's contours.and scenic features including preservation of
most of the existing thirteen mature trees into its development
design.
9. The proposed use would have minimal if any adverse
environmental effects
14
In general the proposed use would greatly improve the
appearance of this site within the neighborhood as well as
improving surrounding property values.
15
ATTACHMENT 8
Ramsey - Washington Metro
01;
7
Distri
A=t:
Donald Callahan
975 County Road C
Maplewood, MN 53109
12/22/00
Dear Mr. Callahan,
941aYR311w r. ? C + 5 , ire• o' Y 3 L '4+' zn rd
SDI "01 __109
4 sn3 f-"t, 8 Sri
r
4 ,.3 x ..s q. v d 7 'i , — ) a s'i.
s _ _
rag
This letter is in response to the plans the City of Maplewood sent to the Watershed
District to review for the proposed lot division at 1101 County Road C.
Any grading activity on this site will require a watershed District Grading Permit. I am
enclosing a grading permit application packet along with this letter.
The Watershed District has identified a high quality wetland in the north end of the
property. Please enclose a copy of the delineation for this wetland with an Gradingya
Permit application material. If there is any proposed impact to the wetland, the steps that
will need to be taken are outlined in the grading permit application packet. Please be
advised that any proposed impacts to the wetland will grequirealenth y reviewq process top
meet the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act. Due to the current site
conditions, the Watershed District will only require a 10 foot no- disturb buffer instead of
the usual 100 foot no- disturb buffer.
Please contact nee at the number listed above if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Karl Hammers r
District Technician
cc: Ken Roberts, City of Maplewood
16
ATTACHMENT 9
DON AND ALICE CHRISTIANSON
1111 COUNTY RD, C
MAPLEWOOD MN 55109
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
SUBJECT; LOT DIVISION --1101 COUNTY ROAD C
12 -19 -00
DEAR KEN;
SEVERAL YEARS AGO WHEN THE WATSONS PUT THIS LAND UP
FOR SALE I ASKED THE CITY IF I COULD BUY IT AND SPLIT IT.
THE REPLY I GOT WAS THAT .IT COULD NOT BE SPLIT AS BOTH
HALVES NEEDED TO BE 10,000 SQ. FT. BUILDABLE AREA,
THAT SAID; I STILL THINK THAT THE LOT SHOULD BE SPLIT,
PER MR. CALLAHAN'S REQUEST. MOST OF THE HOMES IN THE
IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD ARE BUILT ON 70 FT. WIDE LOTS AND I
THINK TWO SMALLER HOMES ( I TRUST) WOULD FIT BETTER THAN ONE
HUGE HOME!
ALL OF THE HOMES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 'Cr HAVE
DIFFERENT SETBACKS FROM THE ROAD AND STRANGELY, SOME HAVE
DIFFERENT ANGLES OF ORIENTATION. I HOPE SOMETHING CAN BE
DONE, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, TO AVERAGE THIS OUT IN
ANY NEW DESIGNS.
THE LOWER BACK YARD HAS BEEN ILLEGALLY FILLED IN THE
LAST COUPLE OF YEARS AND I HOPE NO MORE FILLING OF THE
WETLAND WOULD TAKE PLACE. THE SIGHT PLAN SHOWS TWO
RETAINING WALLS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, TOUCHING
OUR PROPERTY, THAT DO NOT EXIST.
THE MOST IMPORTANT THING THAT MUST BE CONSIDERED IN
ANY NEW DESIGN IS DRAINAGE! THE WATER DRAINS FROM THE EAST
TO THE WEST ON THE 1ST 3 LOTS. 1117 TO 1111 (US) TO 1101.
WATER FROM THE STREET AND DRIVEWAY DRAINS DOWN TOWARD OUR
GARAGE AND ARE DRAINED OFF ONTO 1101. IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN
THAT WAY AND CANNOT CHANGE WITHOUT FLOODING OUR BASEMENT,
SOME 'OF 1101 WAS FILLED 2YRS AGO AND THE SLOPE YOU SEE AT
THE EAST SIDE IS THE NATURAL SLOPE. 877' TO 870'.
I HOPE YOU APPROVE MR. CALLAHAN'S PLAN. HE IS A
NEIGHBOR AND HAS DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB REMODELING HIS HOME.
AS SOMEONE WHO LIVES ON KOHLMAN LAKE I TRUST HE WILL DO AN
OUTSTANDING JOB DESIGNING TWO HOMES THAT WILL FIT AND NOT
DISTRACT, AND THUS INCREASE EVERYONE'S PROPERTY VALUES.
THANKS,
DON AND ALI E
17
ATTACHMENT 10
0 Q cc
p =r n n
r.- m
p N
40
S'
O aD oh
o N89 °31916AE m
co
v
70.00
Wc
Q
C.4 wW
CMD C
r 'r
0
0 c rX0.6
Q
v ooe
x
moop
V CA t M
1
t0
O
cc 1
m
j
i
m \40' N
co1Dcm
cb
cc N
V p6/ Nldl
WETLAND BUFFER EASEMENT LINE
oeoo""
WETLAND BUFFER EASEMENT LINE
A C
Z
as m
co o .P cu -
co
ca
m
co
m
p x o
N v Os
X
to
to
m
m
w
x
cr
x
as
CA co x
v
X .
v Ab
Q x
ZQ4 m
to . N y c"
co v
J
Z CD w
5
o a
s
0 co
ti
o w ,
w 70.01
Jo
CD
4. Q m cap
o N89 °31916AE m
co
A w Wc C.4 wW
CMD C
r 'r
0
0 c rX0.6 r
co
x
moop
m°
Q x
ZQ4 m
to . N y c"
co v
J
Z CD w
5
o a
s
0 co
ti 70.00•w 70.01
c m t ;,N89 ° 3't 1 fi E ot o N89 °31916AE m
co
A w Wc C.4 wW
cc o
s
x EXIS TING CURB oo a
x
m°
m
v
0
o
i
r i # R1
CDv
SITE PLAN
WITH STAFF CONDITIONS)
18
4
N
ATTACHMENT 11
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Donald Callahan applied for a conditional use permit to divide a 140- foot -wide
lot into two 70- foot -wide lots in the R -1 zoning district.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 1101 County Road C. The legal
description is:
The Westerly 140 feet of the Easterly 280 feet of the West '/ of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4
Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Maplewood, Ramsey County. (PIN 04 -29 -22-43 -0005)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1.On January 17, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve the conditional use permit for the proposal.
2. The city council held a public hearing on February 12, 2001. City staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required
by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present
written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of
the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding
area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods
of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause
a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke,
dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would
not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including
streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems,
schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
19
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow site plans approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes. The site plans shall meet the following
conditions:
a. The front setback for each house shall be 25 feet.
b. The rear of each house shall not be more than 70 feet from the front property line.
C. There shall be at least 20 feet of side yards for each house - at least 10 feet on
each side.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one
I
year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The applicant or building contractor shall provide a grading, drainage and erosion control
plan with each building permit application. These plans shall show:
a. The proposed house pad and the proposed building pad elevation and contour
information for each lot. The house pads shall be such that minimize the grading on
the lots so the builder can save as many of the existing trees on each lot as
possible.
b. Contour.information for all the land that the construction will disturb. This shall
include the existing and proposed drainage patterns with elevations and contours
for each lot.
C. The wetland and the wetland buffer area being outside the grading limits.
d. All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the
plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1.
e. All retaining walls on the plans. Any new retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a
building permit from the city.
f. No grading beyond the property boundaries without temporary grading easements
from the affected property owner(s).
The city engineer must approve these plans before the city will issue a building permit.
4. The applicant or building contractor providing the city a tree plan that:
a. Shall be approved by the city engineer before building demolition or removal, site
grading or final lot split approval.
b. Shows where the developer or builder will remove, save or replace large trees.
20
C. Shows no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
d. Shows the size, species and location of the replacement and screening trees. The
deciduous trees shall be at least two and one half (2 %) inches in diameter and
shall be a mix of red and white oaks, ash, lindens and sugar maples. The
coniferous trees shall be a mix of Austrian pine and other species.
5. Before the city approves and stamps the lot division deeds, the applicant or owner shall
complete the following:
a. Remove or demolish the existing house and garage from the property according to
all applicable state demolition ordinances. This is to ensure the owner or contractor
properly disposes all demolition debris in a licensed demolition landfill.
b. Record a wetland buffer and drainage easement over all the property that is north
of the wetland buffer easement line shown on the survey on page 18 of this staff
report.
C. Provide city staff with a screening plan for each lot. This plan is to show how the
applicant will meet the code requirement that the new houses be at least eighty (80)
percent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline of the
lake during the summer.
d. Prepare and record covenants with each lot that requires the property owners to
keep the required screening on each lot.
e. Install one permanent wetland buffer sign per lot. These signs shall be around the
edge of the wetland buffer easement. These signs shall mark the edge of the
easement and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling,
grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign design and
location before the contractor installs them. The developer or contractor shall install
these signs before the city issues building permits in this plat.
f. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundary.
6. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 2001.
21
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2001
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Conditional Use Permit -Lot Division (1101 County Road C).
Melinda Coleman, Assistant City Manager, gave the staff report for the city. Mr. Callahan, the
applicant, is requesting city approval of a conditional use permit to divide a 140 - foot -wide lot into
two 70 -foot wide lots. This property is on County Road C just west of Highway 61. The
Maplewood city code allows interior lots with widths between 60 and 75 feet in the R -1 zone with
city council approval of a conditional use permit (CUP).. Mr. Callahan is requesting this CUP for a
lot split to construct two new homes. The new houses will be on the two new lots after
Mr. Callahan demolishes or removes the existing house and garage from the property.
Section 36 -442 of the City Code gives nine standards for approval of conditional use permits.
Section 36 -69(2) of the City Code gives the following additional condition for approving new
interior lots that are between 60 and 75 feet in width:
There are at least two developed lots -of- record with the same or less width than
proposed, within 350 feet of the site on the street. Larger minimum side yard setbacks
may be required to balance the separation between structures."
This request meets the required findings for approval of a conditional use permit and for narrow -
width lots. There are six lots on County Road C within 350 feet of the site that have a width of
either 65 or 70 feet. This proposal is within character of what is happening along that street.
The site is in the shoreland district of Kohiman Lake. The city code has several requirements for
placement and design of the proposed single dwellings near lakes, including this site. These
include a requirement that each lot be at least 20,000 square feet in area. The city code defines
lot area as "the area of a lot, excluding drainage easements, wetlands and the land below the
ordinary high water mark of public waters." Each of the proposed lots, however, would not have
20,000 square feet of buildable land outside of the wetland and lake area. Each lot would have
about 8,000 to 10,000 square feet of buildable area.
The shoreland code has a provision to deal with this situation. Section 36 -566 (b)(1)(c) of the code
says that the minimum lot requirements shall not apply to a development that is at least eighty
80) percent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline during the
summer. As such, if the applicant could prepare and implement a screening plan for the two lots
that show how the new houses would be screened from the lake to meet the 80 percent
requirement, then the city could approve the lot division.
Section 36 -573 of the city code says that "Each lot created through subdivision shall be suitable
for development with minimal alteration. The city shall consider lots suitable for development
that would create any of the following effects:
1) Susceptibility to flooding; (2) filling of wetlands; (3) building on soils with severe
development limitations; (4) creating severe erosion potential; (5) building on steep
topography; (6) inadequate water supply or sewage treatment capabilities or (7) creating
a loss of protected wildlife habitat."
The proposed lot division can meet the above - listed objectives and the lots are suitable for
development. Having two houses on this property, if the owner properly screens them from the
lake and if the owner carefully places them on the property, should not cause any negative effects
on the lake, on the environment or on the health, safety or welfare of the citizens.
This site is next to a Class I wetland. As such, the city has several regulations about the use of
land and the placement of the structures near the wetland. Because the site is near a wetland
and a lake, the city asked the staff of the Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District to
comment on this proposal. They recommend that the applicant not make any impact on the
wetland as it would require a lengthy review under the Wetland Conservation Act. They also noted
that since much of the buffer area had been disturbed they would only require the applicant to
dedicate a 10- foot -wide no- disturb buffer instead the 100 - foot -wide no- disturb buffer that the code
would usually require.
Both the shoreland code and the wetland code have language about the placement of structures
near a lake and near a wetland. Section 36 -566 (c)(1) of the code has language about the
placement, design and height of structures in the shoreland areas. Specifically, this part of the
code says that "where structures exist on the adjoining lots on both sides of a proposed building
site, the owner or builder may change the structure's setbacks without a variance to meet the
adjoining structures setbacks from the ordinary high water level."
Section 9- 196(d)(1)a of the city code says that the wetland setback regulations shall not apply to
structure, vegetation and maintenance activities and practice in existence on the date this
ordinance becomes effective. (May 13, 1996.) A contractor or owner may remodel, reconstruct or
replace affected structures if the new construction does not take up more buffer land than the
structure used before the remodeling, reconstruction or replacement."
These code sections say that the applicant may Fine up the rear of the new houses with the rear of
the neighbor's houses and that the new construction may occur as long as it does not further
impact the wetland buffer. The applicant has not yet submitted specific site plans for the proposed
lots. It appears, however, that there is enough room on the two lots to meet the setback
requirements of the shoreland code and those in the wetland regulations.
Staffs recommendation is to approve the conditional use permit for the property at 1101 County
Road C for Donald Callahan for two 70 -foot wide interior lots in the R1 zoning district. The permit
is subject to the noted conditions, with the first being the one Mr. Callahan would like to discuss
with the commission. It states the construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The
front setback for each house shall be 25 feet and the rear of each house shall not be more than
65 feet from the front property line. Staff feels there is a possibility of increasing that to 75 feet
and still keep what is within the character of the neighborhood as long as the grading limits do not
disturb the wetland easement.
Mr. Trippler asked how many feet would be between the no disturb zone and the back of the
house. Ms. Coleman responded by saying there would be about 13 feet to the line.
Mr. Rossbach asked if tree planting is allowed in the buffered zone. Staff responded by saying a
certain species is allowed to be planted there and this is something that should be reviewed by
the DNR and watershed district. The city's goal is to screen the area with deciduous and
coniferous trees so a buffer is created.
Mr. Ledvina questioned the ordinance setback from the wetlands. He asked if it was the opinion
of staff that the site falls into the category of remodeling, reconstruction, or replacement? Ms.
Coleman confirmed that was their opinion. She added that there had been so much degradation of
the whole area that they were comfortable with the development of the property as long as it was
not encroaching any closer than what was presently happening. She also added that the DNR
was comfortable with this proposal.
Mr. Trippler asked why the house was not included in the demolition verbiage. Ms. Coleman
stated when the lot is split, the garage will be % on each lot. From a practical standpoint, she felt
both buildings would be demolished. Mr. Trippler would be more comfortable if the conditions
stated the buildings would be demolished and properly disposed of.
Donald Callahan, 975 County Road C, the applicant, gave an overview of the project. He
explained the area to the east of the property, which appears to be a ravine, was a driveway at
one time. The present retaining wall is 8 to 10 feet high. The elevations of the homes are
considerably above the wetland delineation. Mr. Callahan has talked with the DNR and one of the
requests he will be making will be to create a channel out to the open water that would serve both
lots. The expected size of the homes will be 2200 square feet and will include a triple garage.
Mr. Rossbach was concerned with the side lot setbacks, the size of the homes being built and the
homes blocking the view of the lake for neighbors. Mr. Callahan responded in saying the current
plans do meet the side yard setbacks. The width of the existing home is basically the same width
as the proposed attached three car garage. The footprint of the home is approximately 55x55.
The distance between the two living areas of the proposed homes is 20 feet. The commissioners
are concerned the main objective of the builder is putting as much house as possible on the land.
Mr. Ledvina is not comfortable that the proposal fits the Is grandfathering" requirement of
remodeling, reconstruction or replacement for the wetland setback ordinance. He does not feel
the construction of two new homes fits into that category.
Mr. Mueller feels a smaller footprint would be more appropriate to preserve the wetland. Ms.
Coleman reiterated that the commission has the right to recommend other setback requirements
that would better suit the character of the neighborhood.
Mr. Rossbach is in. favor of splitting the lots only because of the pressure to increase the density
and provide housing in the city. He does not feel developers need to fill every bit of land with as
much homes as possible. In this particular case where the city is allowing a developer to build on
a piece of land that is considered substandard on a shoreland lot, the city should be able to
dictate what, and how much, is built on that parcel. He feels larger side yard setbacks would be
appropriate.
Mr. Ledvina stated in many cases where there is a reduction in the wetland buffer there is a
monument placed on the edge of the buffer stating requirements not to mow or disturb the buffer,
and feels the monument would be appropriate in this case.
The planning commission suggested the following adjustments to the conditions in the
recommendation:
1. Condition 1: change 65 feet to 70 feet. Add: In addition, the side yard setbacks
shall be 20 feet total (either side).
2. A modification would be made to condition 5a which would now read: Remove or
demolish the existing house and garage from the property in accordance with all
applicable state demolition ordinances and ensure all demolition debris is properly
disposed of in a licensed demolition landfill.
3. Condition 5e would be added to require one wetland easement marker per lot.
Commissioner Frost moved the planning commission recommend to the city council to adopt the
resolution approving a conditional use permit for the property at 1101 County Road C for Donald
Callahan. This permit is for the creation of two 70- foot -wide interior lots in the R -1 zoning district.
This permit shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow site plans approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes. The site plans shall meet the following
conditions:
a. The front setback for each house shall be 25 feet.
b. The rear of each house shall not be more than 70 feet from the front property
line.
C. There shall be at least 20 feet of side yards for each house - at least 10 feet on
each side.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started. within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The applicant or building contractor shall provide a grading, drainage and erosion control
plan with each building permit application. These plans shall show:
a. The proposed house pad and the proposed building pad elevation and contour
information for each lot. The house pads shall be such that minimize the grading
on the lots so the builder can save as many of the existing trees on each lot as
possible.
b. Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. This shall
include the existing and proposed drainage patterns with elevations and contours
for each lot.
C. The wetland and the wetland buffer area being outside the grading limits.
d. All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve
the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than
e. All retaining walls on the plans. Any new retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a
building permit from the city.
f. No grading beyond the property boundaries without temporary grading
easements from the affected property owner(s).
The city engineer must approve these plans before the city will issue a building permit.
4. The applicant or building contractor providing the city a tree plan that:
a. Shall be approved by the city engineer before building demolition or removal, site
grading or final lot split approval.
b. Shows where the developer or builder will remove, save or replace large trees.
C. Shows no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
d. Shows the size, species and location of the replacement and screening trees.
The deciduous trees shall be at least two and one half (2 %Z) inches in diameter
and shall be a mix of red and white oaks, ash, lindens and sugar maples. The
coniferous trees shall be a mix of Austrian pine and other species.
5. Before the city approves and stamps the lot division deeds, the applicant or owner shall
complete the following:
a. Remove or demolish the existing house and garage from the property according
to all applicable state demolition ordinances. This is to ensure that the owner or
contractor properly disposes all demolition debris in a licensed demolition landfill.
b. Record a wetland buffer and drainage easement overall the property that is north
of the wetland buffer easement line shown on the survey on page 16 of this staff
report.
C. Provide city staff with a screening plan for each lot. This plan is to show how the
applicant will meet the code requirement that the new houses be at least eighty
80) percent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline
of the lake during the summer.
d. Prepare and record covenants with each lot that requires the property owners to
keep the required screening on each lot.
e. Install one permanent wetland buffer sign per lot. These signs shall be around the
edge of the wetland buffer easement. These signs shall mark the edge of the
easement and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling,
grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign design and
location before the. contractor installs them. The developer or contractor shall
install these signs before the city issues building permits in this plat.
f. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundary.
6. - The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Commissioner Trippler seconded. Ayes -6 (Fischer, Frost, Trippler, Rossbach,
Ahlness, Mueller)
Nays -1 (Ledvina)
Mr. Ledvina's nay vote was due to his belief that this proposal does not meet the exemption for
the variance process as it relates to the wetland setback.
This proposal will go the city council on February 12, 2001.
AGENDAnIM NO /l
Action by Council
MEMORANDUM Date
TO: City Manager
Endorsed
1VlodifiedFROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Rejectede
SUBJECT: Parking Lot Setback Variance, Curbing Waiver and Conditional se
Permit — Rose -Rice Auto Sales
LOCATION: 1908 Rice Street
DATE: January 30, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Request and Project Description
Brad Beatty, of Rose -Rice Auto Sales, 1908 Rice Street, is requesting approval of a five -foot
parking lot setback variance and a curbing waiver for his recent parking lot expansion. He is also
requesting a conditional use permit (CUP) for used -car sales. This CUP would include the recent
expansion of his existing paved parking lot along Roselawn Avenue which does not meet the
required 15 -foot front setback.
Mr. Beatty's new parking lot is on the previously unpaved side yard that had been used for car
storage by the previous owner, Jerry Anderson. Refer to the maps on pages 7 -9 and the
applicant's letter on page 10.
The applicant has improved the property by residing the two buildings, adding a pitched roof
to one of the buildings, and in general, cleaning up the site. He also removed the cars
Mr. Anderson had parked on the grass east of the buildings.
This project requires the following approvals:
1. A five -foot parking lot setback variance since the new parking lot is paved to the east lot line.
The city code requires that the parking lot have a five -foot side yard setback.
2. A CUP. The city code requires a CUP for used car sales. The previous owner did not have
this permit —he was grandfathered in. The applicant also needs a CUP for the expansion of
a nonconforming use. The applicant's current hard - surface parking lot is paved to the
Roselawn Avenue right -of -way line. The applicant proposes to maintain this zero setback
with the expanded parking lot. (Staff had previously considered this setback encroachment
as a variance issue. After discussing this matter with the planning commission, we feel that
it is appropriate to consider the parking lot encroachment as an "expansion of a
nonconforming use" which would require a CUP.
3. A curbing waiver since the code requires continuous concrete curbing around the new
parking lot. The new parking lot is not curbed.
BACKGROUND
This property was a continual source of parking -code violations when Mr. Anderson owned the
site. This site was also used for a short time as part of agolf -ball driving range for Amusement
City`:
On December 11, 2000, the city council approved a CUP for used car sales across the street
from this property at 1930 Rice Street for Affordable Auto Sales.
DISCUSSION
Setback Variance
State law requires that the city council make two findings to approve a variance. They must
determine that the applicant cannot meet the code because of "circumstances unique to the
property." This means that there must be some unique physical characteristic of the site
preventing code compliance. There is no unique circumstance in this instance. The applicant
could have met the setback requirement if they checked with the city before paving. The
variance must also meet the "spirit and intent of the ordinance." The purpose of the setback
requirement is that parking lots do not crowd neighboring properties, so there is room for snow
storage and room for landscaping.
Staff, unfortunately, cannot make the findings required for approval of the setback variance.
Staff recommends that the applicant saw -cut the pavement to meet the required five -foot side
setback.
Curbing Waiver and Drainage Considerations
Code states that the city may waive the curbing requirement, if elimination of the curbs to allow
sheet drainage over ground, would improve storm water quality. This determination must be
made by the city engineer. The planning commission felt that this issue should be addressed by
the city engineer to see if there are such benefits.
Chris Cavett, the assistant city engineer, inspected the site and feels that the applicant should
have a drainage plan prepared by a civil engineer. The drainage plan should address the
management of storm water runoff. Under the present conditions, the rate of runoff has
increased due to the paving of this side lot, which was originally bare ground and grass. The
drainage is presently directed south toward the adjacent properly onto a steep slope which will
be prone to erosion.
There appears to be two options the applicant may wish to pursue regarding the management of
runoff. Collection of runoff on the site and conveyance to the storm sewer on Rice Street
MnDOT permits and approvals are required), or coordinating efforts with the neighboring
property owner to the south to manage the storm water after it has left the site (agreements and
easements may be required between the neighbors). In considering whether the city should
waive the curbing requirement, we need to evaluate the applicant's proposal.
Conditional Use Permit
Staff does not find a problem with the proposed CUP to sell used cars. Other than the setback
and curbing issues, the applicant has vastly improved this corner by refurbishing the buildings
and eliminating a long- occurring eyesore. Staff also feels this CUP should include the expansion
of the parking lot which maintains the zero setback from the Roselawn Avenue right -of -way.
Maintaining this setback would look less out of place than jogging it in 15 feet as the code would
require for a new parking lot.
2
Site Plan
The applicant should stripe the parking lot with spaces to be 9 % by 18 feet. in size and drive
aisles to be 24 feet wide as required by the code. The applicant should submit a striping plan to
staff for approval.
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
January 17, 2001: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP and approval of
the parking lot setback encroachment into the 15 -foot setback from Roselawn Avenue. The
planning commission recommended denial of the five foot parking lot setback variance from the
east lot line.
January 23, 2001: The community design review board made the same recommendations as the
planning commission.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Deny the proposed five -foot parking lot setback variance from the east property line since the
proposed variance does not meet the following .findings required by state law:
1. Strict enforcement of the code would not cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the property. The applicant could have met the setback
requirements without any hindrance by site characteristics.
2. The variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The
ordinance requires parking lot setbacks to provide room for snow storage and so not to
crowd adjacent properties.
B. Adopt the resolution on pages 11 -12 approving a conditional use permit for used car sales at
1908 Rice Street. This resolution also approves the recently expanded parking lot which
maintains the existing nonconforming setback from Roselawn Avenue. Approval of the
reduced front setback is because the continuation of the existing pavement setback would
meet the spirit and intent of the code. The approval of a conditional use permit for car sales
is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city, except as stated below.
The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The applicant shall revise the site plan for staff approval as follows:
a. Cut away the part of the new easterly parking lot which encroaches into the required
five -foot side setback area. The applicant shall backfill and sod this five -foot setback
area.
b. The excess pavement material shall be removed from the site.
3
c. The edges of the new parking lot shall be curbed with upright continuous concrete
curbing. The plan for this curbing shall be submitted to staff for approval by the city
engineer who will evaluate the parking lot for drainage control. The curbing
requirement may be waived if deemed necessary for drainage purposes by the city
engineer.
The applicant shall also submit a drainage plan prepared by a civil engineer or work
out a satisfactory plan and agreement with the neighbor to the south. The drainage
plan should address the management of storm water runoff.
d. The required five foot setback shall be measured to the back of the curb, if the
engineer requires curbing, not to the parking lot edge.
e. Stripe the parking spaces as required by code.
f. The applicant shall designate four customer parking spaces on the west side of the
building. There shall be one handicap - accessible parking space. This space must
meet the requirements of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act).
3. The applicant shall complete these parking lot corrections by June 30, 2001. The city
council shall review this permit at that time if the work is not completed. The council may
extend this deadline if an extension is warranted.
4. The city council shall review this permit annually as required by the code, unless they
determine that there is no need for such subsequent reviews.
4
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: One acre
Existing land use: Rose -Rice Auto Sales
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Affordable Auto Sales
West: Rice Street and commercial businesses in the City of Roseville.
South and East: Amusement City (currently proposed as the new Comfort Bus Company
Terminal)
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: BC (business commercial)
Zoning: BC
Code Requirements
Section 36- 151(b)(5)(a) requires a CUP for the sale or leasing of used motor vehicles.
Section 36 -17(e) allows the enlargement of a nonconforming use by CUP if it would not affect
the development of the parcel as it is zoned.
Section 36 -28 O requires that parking lots be setback 15 feet from a street right -of -way and five
feet from abutting commercial property.
Section 36 -22 O requires that parking lots which have more than 12 parking spaces have
continuous concrete curbing.
Criteria for Variance Approval
State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance from the
zoning code:
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
property under consideration.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
Undue hardship ", as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be
put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the
landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the
variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations
alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the
terms of the ordinance.
5
Criteria for CUP Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may grant a CUP, subject to the nine standards for
approval. Refer to the resolution on pages 11 -12.
Application Date
We received the applicant's applications on December 13, 2000. State law requires that the
city take action within 60 days of this application date. City council action is required by
February 13, 2001.
p:sec181roserice.2
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Site Plan
4. Applicant's letter of CUP request dated - stamped December 13, 2000
5. CUP Resolution
0
Attachment 1
LITTLE CANADA
oR —
U1tlR E
0ouw
ci ImC AV E li417Ik1A01lfLJt
p S70.1 HN
5101i1AN /MIE.
Iff YEJMION
O O
lO.LMID00 /IVE. X11. g AME
y
iEMON IYIIE
lit ' fwlkEY AVE. 6
11051pN IaIOSI
IWE IUCE
IARPE NIEIIR M'E i OC
i
LOCATION MAP
rA
4
N
Attachment 2
1 7-1 `
1
I
r
ROSELAWN AVENUE + ___- ______..________ _____ _____. _ . __.._ -____ _____________
i f
ROSE= RICE
AUTO SALES
AMUSEMENT CITY - ...
1870
r
16
J r
W
W Iw
J :'':' ^'•, yrjir r+:; : { r J f
f
PROPERTY LINE MAP
8
T1
Attachment 3
J
b
67. ssr
V
SITE PLAN
9
n
r
ZoSb L,4ca
4
N
gig a
Attachment 4
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
At the following address of 1908 Rice Street, we are trying to obtain a zoning variance for the
parking of cars for sale and reconditioning. The front half of the existing property is already approved for
the sale of used cars and we are looking to further expand our lot to include the back half of the property.
This area has been utilized in conjunction with the front half for used cars during the past ten years. we are
looking to obtain the permits and zoning to legally conform to the cities requirements. The proposed area
has already been cleaned up and is ready for use. We have improved the existing property and feel the
request for the "CUP" would be a natural extension of the total property. We would appreciate your
consideration in this request and look forward to working with the city of Maplewood and surrounding
businesses to make things work as soon as possible.
THANK YOU
Owl
RECEIVED
uEC 13 2000
10
Attachment 5
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Brad Beatty, of Rose -Rice Auto Sales, applied for a conditional use permit to
enlarge his paved parking lot, while maintaining a nonconforming front setback, and to self used
cars.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1948 Rice Street. The legal description is:
LOTS 1 -4 AND LOTS 33 -39, BLOCK 4, EISENMENGER AND ZASPELS
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On January 17, 2061, the planning commission recommended that the. city council
approve this permit.
2. The city council held a public hearing on February 12, 2001. City staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
11
10. The reduced front parking lot setback would meet the spirit and intent of the code since it
would be a continuation of the existing pavement setback.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city, except as stated below.
The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The applicant shall revise the site plan for staff approval as follows:
a. Cut away the part of the new easterly parking lot which encroaches into the required
five -foot side setback area. The applicant shall backfill and sod this five -foot setback
area.
b. The excess pavement material shall be removed from the site.
c. The edges of the new parking lot shall be curbed with upright continuous concrete
curbing. The plan for this curbing shall be submitted to staff for approval by the city
engineer who will evaluate the parking lot for drainage control. The curbing
requirement may be waived if deemed necessary for drainage purposes by the city
engineer.
The applicant shall also submit a drainage plan prepared by a civil engineer or work
out a satisfactory plan and agreement with the neighbor to the south. The drainage
plan should address the management of storm water runoff.
d. The required five foot setback shall be measured to the back of the curb, if the
engineer requires curbing, not to the parking lot edge.
e. Stripe the parking spaces as required by code.
f. The applicant shall designate four customer parking spaces on the west side of the
building. There shall be one handicap - accessible parking space. This space must
meet the requirements of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act).
3. The applicant shall complete these parking lot corrections by June 30, 2001. The city
council shall review this permit at that time if the work is not completed. The council may
extend this deadline if an extension is warranted.
4. The city council shall review this permit annually as required by the code, unless they
determine that there is no need for such subsequent reviews.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on February 12, 2001.
12
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAP LEWOO D, MINNESOTA
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2001
B. Parking Lot Setback and Curbing Variances and Conditional Use Permit -- Rose -Rice Auto (1908 Rice
Street).
Ms. Coleman gave the staff report for the city. Brad Beatty, of Rose -Rice Auto Sales, is requesting
approval of a parking lot setback and curbing variances for his recent parking lot expansion and a
conditional use permit for used car sales. Mr. Beatty recently paved the easterly part of the site. This is
the unpaved side yard that has been used for unapproved car - parking by the previous Owner, Jerry
Anderson. The applicant has improved the property by residing the two buildings, adding a pitched roof to
one of the buildings, and in general, cleaning up the site. He also removed the cars Mr. Anderson had
parked on the grass east of the building.
This project requires the following approvals:
1. A parking lot setback variance since the new parking lot is paved up the east (side) and north (front) lot
lines. The city code requires that the parking lot have a five -foot side yard setback and a 15 -foot front
setback from the Roselawn Avenue right -of -way. (The applicant said that the new pavement is setback
about 20 feet from the south lot line.)
The applicant would also need a curbing variance since the code requires continuous concrete curbing
around the new parking lot.
2. A CUP (conditional use permit). The city code requires a CUP for used car sales. The previous owner
did not have this permit, as he was grandfathered in. The current owner needs a CUP because of the
expansion of the paved parking lot.
This property has been a continuous source of parking code violations when the previous owner was in
charge. The city has worked long and diligently to gain compliance on this site. Staff feels the building
has been improved greatly. The current operation has been run very well and the appearance has
improved greatly. Ms. Coleman stated "It was upsetting that the applicant made the parking lot
improvements without working with the city on that improvement ".
David Parupsky, 3229 A. Casco Circle, Wayzata, was present to answer questions for the applicant. Mr.
Parupsky explained the old, unpaved parking lot had been there for thirty years. When he was told by Mr.
Ekstrand, Associate Planner, that the lot had to be paved, he paved it. Unfortunately, prior to paving, he
did not apply for a permit or address setback requirements.
State law requires that the city council make two findings in order to approve variances. First, they must
determine that the applicant cannot meet the code because of "circumstances unique to the property."
They must find that the applicant cannot meet the code due to some unique physical characteristic of the
site. There is not unique circumstance in this case. The applicant could have met the setback and
curbing requirements if they had checked with the city before paving this site. Secondly, the variances
must meet the "spirit and intent of the ordinance." The purpose of the setback and curbing requirement
are so parking lots do not crowd neighboring properties, so there is area provided for snow storage and
landscaping for esthetics. Curbing also provides a neat edge to parking lots and controls storm water
runoff.
Staff appreciates the improvements the applicant has made at this site. Their buildings are attractive and
the site is now nicely maintained. Mr. Beatty also did an excellent job of removing Jerry Anderson's cars
from the unpaved side yard, which for a long time was an eyesore. Unfortunately, staff cannot make the
finding that state law requires for the approval. Staff recommends that the applicant make the necessary
changes and corrections to the new parking lot as follows: saw -cut the bituminous to meet the required
five -foot side setback as well as the required 15 -foot front setback; provide continuous concrete curbing
around the south, north and east sides of the parking lot (keeping in mind that the required setbacks must
be measured to the back edge of the curb); backfill behind the curbing and restore with sod.
Staff is not recommending that variances be granted. Staff is recommending that the applicant make the
necessary changes and corrections to the new parking lot as follows:
Cut out the bituminous to meet the required 5 -foot side yard setback as well as the 15 front yard set back
and to provide continuous concrete curbing around the south, north and east sides of the parking lot.
Also, backfilling where the pavement has been cut out.
The operation to sell used cars does meet the intent of the ordinance. It is an activity that has been going
on there for quite some time. Other than the setback and curbing issues, the applicant has greatly
improved the corner by refurbishing the buildings and eliminating a long occurring eyesore.
Staff recommended the approval of a conditional use permit with the condition that the applicant correct
the parking lot issues. Staff would also recommend the applicant have until next summer to correct the
issues since we are in the middle of winter. With the exception of the requirements to meet the setback
and curbing requirements, the site plan looks fine. The parking lot should be striped according to parking
spaces and drive aisles as required by code. This would be spaces that are 9 %2 feet by 18 feet and drive
aisles of 24 feet wide. Staffs recommendation is that the proposed parking lot setback and curbing
variances be denied because they do not meet the findings required by state law. Strict enforcement of
the code would not cause undue hardship because of the circumstances unique to the property. The
applicant could have met the setback and curbing requirements without any hindrance by site
characteristics. Two of the variances would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
The ordinance requires parking lot setbacks and curbed edges to maintain a neat appearance, control
drainage and provide an on site area to store snow in the winter. Secondly, staff is recommending the
commission to adopt the resolutions to approve the conditional use permit for used car sales at 1908 Rice
Street.
Commissioner Mueller was concerned with the cars that are parking on Roselawn Avenue. He also noted
there is a 10 -foot fence on the east and north side of the property facing Roselawn Avenue with pavement
that extends right up to the fence.
Mr. Parupsky explained they did extended the asphalt up to the fence, but felt if they were to tear out the 5
feet of asphalt and re -sod, it would not change the appearance due to the 10 -foot fence screening the
view of this area. He was not aware of any cars parking on Roselawn Avenue. Ms. Coleman explained
that she was not aware of the street parking either, and suggested a requirement could be added to the
conditions that the applicant should designate customer parking on the site plan.
The applicant explained at one time there were 130 "for- sale" cars on the lot, but currently there are only
about 40. He felt that should leave plenty of parking for shoppers on the lot so they would not have to
park on Roselawn Avenue.
Commissioner Rossbach asked where the runoff from the parking lot flows. Mr. Parupsky stated the lot is
sloped to the south side of the property where they will now be building a curb.
Ms. Coleman explained the city is allowed to not require curbing if the public works director sees a reason
for drainage purposes not to have curbing. In the conditions it states the plans for curbing must be
submitted to staff for approval by the city engineer who will evaluate the parking lot for drainage control.
She also stated, due to the ordinance change, the commission could give the engineer latitude to say
there should not be curbing on that south side to allow for drainage.
Mr. Rossbach also noted that the 10 -foot fence is a cyclone fence that you can see through. Therefore,
you could see whether there was grass or pavement on the other side of the fence.
Mr. Parupsky confirmed that would be the case.
Mr. Mueller reiterated the importance of parking being designated as customer parking so it is made
obvious where they are to park. He also expressed his concern of having "one big corner" filled will
asphalt, busses, and cars and across the road from a swimming beach for families.
Mr. Rossbach moved the commission to recommend to the city council to:
Al. Approve the proposed fifteen -foot parking lot setback variance from the north property Fine
since the proposed variance does meet the following findings required by state law and it is a
continuation of an existing parking lot and non - conforming use; it also meets the spirit and intent
of the ordinance.
A2. Deny the proposed parking lot setback and curbing variance on the east side of the lot since
the proposed variance does not meet the following findings required by state law.
1. Strict enforcement of the code would not cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the property. The applicant could have met the setback
requirements without any hindrance by site characteristics.
2. The variances would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The
ordinance requires parking lot setbacks to provide room for snow storage and so not to
crowd adjacent properties.
B. To approve a conditional use permit for used car sales at 1908 Rice Street. This resolution also
approves the recently expanded parking lot which maintains the existing nonconforming setback from
Roselawn Avenue. Approval of the reduced front setback is because the continuation of the existing
pavement setback would meet the spirit and intent of the code. The conditional use permit for car sales is
based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city, except as stated below.
The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The applicant shall revise the site plan for staff approval as follows:
a. Cut away the part of the new easterly parking lot which encroaches into the
required fifteen -foot side setback area.
b. The excess pavement material shall be removed from the site.
C. The edges of the new parking lot shall be curbed with upright continuous concrete
curbing. The plan for this curbing shall be submitted to staff for approval by the
city engineer who will evaluate the parking lot for drainage control. The curbing
requirement may be waived if deemed necessary for drainage purposes by the
city engineer.
d. The required fifteen foot setback shall be measured to the back of the curb, if the
engineer requires curbing, not to the parking lot edge.
e. Stripe the parking spaces as required by code.
f. The applicant shall designate four customer parking spaces on the west side of
the building. There shall be one handicap - accessible parking space. This space
must meet the requirements of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act).
3. The applicant shall complete these parking lot corrections by June 30, 2001. The city
council shall review this permit at that time if the work is not completed. The council may
extend this deadline if an extension is warranted.
4. The city council shall review this permit annually as required by the code, unless they
determine that there is no need for such subsequent reviews.
Mr. Frost seconded. Ayes -All
Motion carries.
The proposal goes before city council on February 12th, 2001.
Community Design Review Board
Minutes of 01 -23 -01
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 2001
VI. DESIGN REVIEW
A. Rose -Rice Auto Sales Site Plan Revisions/Variances -(1908 Rice Street).
Mr. Tom Ekstrand, Assistant Director of Community Development, gave the staff report for the
city. Brad Beatty, of Rose -Rice Auto Sales, is requesting approval of a 5 -foot parking lot setback
variance. He purchased the property recently and has been making several improvements. He
paved the easterly front lot which used to be a parking lot for the previous owner's vehicles. The
problem is the expansion of the parking lot was an expansion of its use which requires a
conditional use permit. He also paved up to the easterly fence line which is also the lot line, and
up to the front fence line which is the street right -of -way line. He is asking for a setback variance
for the easterly line and continuation of a non - conforming use.
Staff is denying approval of the setback variance. State law requires that the city council make
two findings to approve a variance. They must determine that the applicant cannot meet the code
because of "circumstances unique to the property ". This means that there must be some unique
physical characteristic of the site preventing code compliance. There is no unique circumstance
in this instance. The applicant could have met the setback requirement if they checked with the
city before paving. The variance must also meet the "spirit and intent of the ordinance." The
purpose of the setback requirement is to ensure parking lots do not crowd neighboring properties,
so there is room for snow storage and room for landscaping. Staff, unfortunately, cannot make
the findings required for approval of the setback variance.
Assistant City Engineer, Chris Cavett, and Mr. Ekstrand visited the site to evaluate the drainage
flow and determined the water is going to run toward the abutting property to the south. There is
a definite drop to the abutting lot (Amusement City). The city engineer feels the applicant should
address this issue by submitting a storm water management plan. Under the present conditions
the rate of runoff has increased due to the paving of the lot. The applicant appears to have two
options: (1) Catch the runoff onsite in a catch base and pipe it underground to the storm sewer on
Rice Street, which would require MnDot permit and approvals. (2) Work with the adjacent
property owner to coordinate an effort for drainage control. Mr. Cavett thought in the second
case, agreements and easements may be required between the neighbors. In order to waive the
curbing requirement, the city would need to evaluate the applicant's proposal. The city has
conditioned its recommendation as such. The applicant needs to submit such a plan to the city for
the city engineer's evaluation.
Staff is recommending approval of the conditional use permit. The operation of the sales of used
cars has drastically improved. The applicant should be commended on cleaning up the site so
well and improving the appearance of the buildings.
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit to include the expanded parking lot
which maintains the zero setback to the Roselawn Avenue right -of -way. This would be keeping in
line with what has been established in that area.
Community Design Review Board
Minutes of 01 -23 -01
A revised set of conditions was distributed by Mr. Ekstrand that included the drainage concerns.
He added a condition that the applicant comply with the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act)
requirement for handicapped parking space. As for curbing, staff is relying on what the submitted
drainage plan will show, where the city engineer determines curbing should be required, or if he
determines curbing may be waived.
Nick Schwartz was present for the applicant. He explained that he has been working with the
owners of the property and Mr. Ekstrand to ensure code compliance while making improvements
to the property. He felt the paving of the parking lot conforms to most of the conditions,. with the
drainage run -off condition being his main concern.
He had talked with the adjacent property owner (Amusement City) prior to blacktopping the
parking lot to receive their approval. He stated "this property owner felt the paving was an
improvement for drainage" and could obtain documentation from the owner if need be.
Mr. Shankar asked if there was any proposed parking in the right -of -way zone, and staff
commented that there was not.
Mr. Ledvina did not see any provision for striping of the parking lot in the conditions. He
suggested that the applicant submit a plan for parking lot striping according to code per staff
approval. Staff commented that these parking lot concerns are addressed in the recommendation
B2: a and f).
The time frame for completion of all the work is June 30, 2001, as clarified by Mr. Shankar. The
drainage issue would need to be addressed as soon as the snow starts melting. Staff also added
that the city engineer recommends that a written agreement be submitted to the city (2C in the
conditions) if the applicant chose to coordinate with the neighbor to sheet drain onto their
property.
Board member Shankar made a motion that the design review board:
A. Deny the proposed five -foot parking lot setback variance from the east property line since the
proposed variance does not meet the following findings required by state law:
1. Strict enforcement of the code would not cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the property. The applicant could have met the setback
requirements without any hindrance by site characteristics.
2. The variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The
ordinance requires parking lot setbacks to provide room for snow storage so not to crowd
adjacent properties.
B. Adopt the resolution that approves a conditional use permit for used car sales at 1908 Rice
Street. This resolution also approves the recently expanded parking lot which maintains the
existing nonconforming setback from Roselawn Avenue. Approval of the reduced front setback is
since the continuation of the existing pavement setback would meet the spirit and intent of the
code. The approval of a conditional use permit for car sales is based on the findings required by
ordinance and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city, except as stated below.
The director of community development may approve minor changes.
Community Design Review Board
Minutes of 01 -23 -01
2. The applicant shall revise the site plan for staff approval as follows:
a. Cut away the part of the new easterly parking lot which encroaches into the
required five -foot side setback area. The applicant shall backfill and sod this five-
foot setback area.
b. The excess pavement material shall be removed from the site.
c. The edges of the new parking lot shall be curbed with upright continuous concrete
curbing. The plan for this curbing shall be submitted to staff for approval by the
city engineer who will evaluate the parking lot for drainage control. The curbing
requirement may be waived if deemed necessary for drainage purposes by the
city engineer.
The applicant shall also submit a drainage plan prepared by a civil engineer or
work out a satisfactory plan and agreement with the neighbor to the south. The
drainage plan should address the management of storm water runoff.
d.' The required five foot setback shall be measured to the back of the curb, if the
engineer requires curbing, not to the parking lot edge.
e. Stripe the parking spaces as required by code.
f. The applicant shall designate four customer parking spaces on the west side of
the building. There shall be one handicap - accessible parking space. This space
must meet the requirements of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act).
3. The applicant shall complete these parking lot corrections by June 30, 2001. The city
council shall review this permit at that time if the work is not completed. The council may
extend this deadline if an extension is warranted.
4. The city council shall review this permit annually as required by the code, unless they
determine that there is no need for such subsequent reviews.
Board member LaCasse seconded. Ayes -All
Motion carries.
This proposal will be before the city council on February 12, 2001.
v
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman, City Mane
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director
SUBJECT: Lake Links Trail Project
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
DATE: February 5, 2001, For the February 12, 2001, City Council Meeting
INTRODUCTION
During the past year, I have served on the technical advisory committee for the Lake
Links Trail project. The Lake Links Trail project is a combination effort of Ramsey and
Washington Counties to cooperatively develop a master plan to include:
a. A trail loop around White Bear Lake
b. A trail loop around Silver Lake
C. Extension of the Bruce Vento Trail from Maplewood to the Hugo trail system
d. Trail links to each of the above and to the Gateway and Stillwater trail system.
The Lake Links Trail project has been completed and is currently in the review process
by each of the effected municipalities and counties.
BACKGROUND
The Lake Links Trail project was supported by local legislators Chuck Wiger and Betty
McCollum and involved the technical support of parks and recreation directors and city
planners from Washington and Ramsey Counties, as well as numerous municipalities.
The project has been approximately 18 months in the planning process and has had
extensive public review with wide - ranging support. The end roduct defines a potentialpp
trail corridor to connect the Bruce Vento Trail on the east to the trail system in Hugo.
The proposed trail system in Maplewood was identified in the city's comprehensive park
plan, which was adopted by the city council, identified as the northern trail corridor. The
trail segment through Maplewood runs parallel to County Road D, using County Road D
as a secondary trail system and ties into the Woodlynn and "D" and Joy Park open
space parcels. In addition, a trail corridor is proposed around Silver Lake.
The Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed the plan and adopted the master
plan with the one addition of adding County Road D as an alternate route from Highway
61 to Century Avenue. The Parks and Recreation Commission had lengthy discussion
Richard Fursman, City Manager 2 February 5, 2001
of the pros and cons of having a trail corridor developed within city open space
property. This issue is currently being reviewed by the open space technical advisory
task force. The Parks and Recreation Commission will review it again in February. The
recommendation at this time is to adopt the Lake Links Trail network master plan with
the addition of County Road D as an alternate rough should city policy makersgYpY
determine that it is not appropriate for a paved trail to dissect the Woodlynn and "D"
and Joy Park open space properties.
Attached is a copy of the city comprehensive plan, which has already been adopted by
the Parks Commission, Planning Commission and City Council. The comprehensive
plan identifies the northern corridor as the preferred trail route.
I have prepared and included a resolution of support for city council consideration.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Lake Links Trail project be approved as presented. Staff
recommends adoption of the resolution memorializing the council position.
jc
Attachments
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE LAKE LINKS TRAIL MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has reviewed the Lake Links Trail Network master
plan prepared by Brauer and Associates, Ltd. and;
WHEREAS, the Lake Links Trail master plan is in conformance with the city's comprehensive
park plan and;
WHEREAS, the Lake Links Trail master plan has been reviewed and approved by the
Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission and Maplewood Planning Commission and;
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood recognizes the importance of regional trail corridors.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Maplewood supports the Lake Links Trail
network master plan and will work collaboratively with other local cities, townships, and
counties toward implementation of the plan with the understanding that the options for each
trail corridor defined in the master plan are subject to local review and refinement as part of
the implementation process.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood recommends that County Road D
be proposed as an alternate route for the trail corridor should it be determined by the City
Council and open space technical advisory task force that it would be detrimental to utilize the
Woodlynn Avenue and County Road D open space property for a trail corridor.
By:
Mayor
Adopted this 12th day of February, 2001.
M
City Manager
kdVakelink.frm
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Summary Statement
Statement Overview The summary statement captures the key o'p y p ants Of the lake Links Trail Network Master Plan as succinctly s
of the details of the
ypossible. Inherently, the summary will not address many e plan. As such, for a morecomprehensiveunderstandingoftheplanningprocessandfindings, it is recommendedg , that the master plan reportbereviewed. Copies of the master plan are available at the city ffices of cities, •ty all of the cities, townships, and countiesinvolvedinthestudy.
Section I - Introduction and
Planning Framework
The project focused on the preparation of a
comprehensive master plan for Lake Links Trail
Network in Washington and Ramsey County.
The project focused on the creation of a comprehensive master Ian for La •p Lake Links Trail Network in WashingtonandRamseyCounties. Funded through a state grant, the ur ose of the project •p p p sect was to cooperatively develop amasterplanforthestudyarea, which included:
A trail loop around White Bear Lake.
A trail loop around Silver Lake.
Extension of the Bruce Vento Trail from Maplewood to the Hugoo trai lpg system.Trail links between each of the above and to the Gateway rail and StillwaterY trail system.
The following figure illustrates the study area for the ro'ect.p 1
Study area map,
RE U }
Al
STUDY AREA ZONE 1 rWithrow001
ar Ail
Z ••
GATEWAY TRAILx
M,
p forth St. Paul 451h.$t.
a,
TUDY AREA ZONE 2 `
40th St N —? .Siegel
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Summary 1
SUMMARY STATEMENT
History nd Rationale for Undertaking PYertak ng the Pro1
This study was a direct outgrowth of ear -
From a historical perspective, this stud as a direct ou
led lann'
g years of citizen on the dev •Y w t ,
thin the study
of years of citizen -led planning Initiatives focusingp ng initiatives focusing on the development elopment of a comprehensive trail system within area. Whetheofacomprehensivetrailsystemwithinthestudtheprimarrationalebehindpast • •
Y er at the local or regional level,Y y area. Y p planning initiatives was fairly straightforward: An interlinkin trails stem '
ht to offer outstanding
g Y withinandbetweenlocalcommunitieswasthoughttstandingrecreationalpotentialandwouldbeofhigcommunityvalue. An equally compelling reason behind these past initiatives w
g
p as the desire for a comprehensivetrailsystemthatwouldalleviatetheunsafeconditionsnowfoundfor •pedestrians and bicyclists within the studyarea. For these reasons, the State legislature responded to citizen. advocacy 'nsive master plan for the Lake Links Trail Y Y sponsoring a grant to develop acomprehensiveailNetwork, with the intent being to determine if the vision of alinkedtrailsystemwasinfactachievablegiventheinherentconstrain °is within the study area.
Project Oversight
responsibility °To support the planning initiative, a Citizens Advisory that th
At the agency level, Washington and Ramsey Counties shared res p ity for overseeing the planning processgerequirementsofthegrantwerefulfilled. o support the planning initiative a 'Committee (CAC> and Technical Advisory Committee d T p g CitizensAdvisory
ensuring
fAQ were formed visory Committee (CAC) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) were formed. 'The former consisted ofcitizensfromeachofthelocalmunicipalitiesandtownshipswhowerefresponsibleeoroverseeing 'with the planning to
p g the planningprocessandworkingpgamondeterminingthemostappropriatetrailrouteswithinthecontext oftheinherentphysicalconstraintsandvaryingublicopinion.p p
Public Involvement
Given the inherently difficult nature of retrofitting trail into developed • •g ped or settled communities, a great deal ofAgreatdealofemphasiswasplacedonworkingwithemphasiswasplacedonworkingwithlocalcommunitiesandtown •
s to define local determine which ships to define local planning issues andlocalcommunitiesandtownshipchtrailrouteoptionswereviable. The public rocess included a numbplanningissuesanddeterminewhichtrailrouteeachcommunihadan
p ber of steps to ensure thattyopportunitytoparticipateandtoensurethatplanningoutcomeswereunderpinnedoptionswereviable
of the p g derpinned by anunderstandingelocalcircumstances. In many cases, the public literallrinputinprocesswasteral)
gain a first -hand and p p y taken down to theindividual )eve! to g understanding of the impact that the various routing scenarios would have onprivateproperty.
Property Acquisition Ap
One of the important factors affecting the ultimate location of the trail 'corridors was the use of a "willing seller"approach by Washington and Ramsey Counties for acquiring property f - •q g p p ty or stand-alone trail corridors. Under thisapproach, potential trail corridors that traverse extensive areas of rivatelp y owned property, such as some of theoldrailroadcorridors, pose mayor challenges for land acquisition anddin the end greatly affected the trails plan. Incaseswherethetrailfollowsexistingroad , the willing sellerYg a translates into trying to stay
need to acquire
within the existing right -of -way wherever possible to minimize the n re property.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Summary 2
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Note, however, that given the eclectic nature of the rights -of -way throughout the study area, acquisition of
Acquisition of additional rights -of -way will be required additional rights -of -way will be required in some areas to accommodate roadway upgrades and trail construction.in some areas to accommodate roadway upgrades In most of these situations, right -of -way acquisition is driven largely b roadw construction r forgYYYqandtrailconstruction. stormwater management, and so forth. In these instances 'grading, g ,the trail would be placed in the rights -of -way
already required for upgrading the roadway.
Section II — Community Value
Statement
Recreational trends suggest that trail activities are the
highest ranked recreational pursuits in this
metropolitan region, far outpacing most other forms of
recreation.
It seems quite evident that the community value of
the trail network being proposed would be very high.
From an overall perspective, those that participated in
the public process express a general belief that the
trail network plan would indeed offer high community
value.
The community value statement essentially defines the benefits that a comprehensive trail network would bring to
residents living within the surrounding region relative to its potential impacts across a number of variables, ranginggg
from safety and crime to property values and loss of privacy. Taken as a whole, the community value statement
defines whether or not the perceived benefits of the trail outweigh perceived impacts to justify its development.
The following statement summarizes these findings.
Community Value Statement
With respect to the overall benefits of a comprehensive trail network, research suggests that trails offer a very high
degree of community value by providing the type of recreational amenity that the majority of the population
would actually use and like to have available near their home. As defined in the master plan, recreational trends
suggest that trail activities are the highest ranked recreational pursuits in this metropolitan region, far outpacing
most other forms of recreation. In addition, the improved safety for pedestrians and bicyclists as they travel along
the proposed trail corridors is a value that some would argue is more important than that of the recreational
experience. The community value statement is strengthened by evidence that suggests that p otential down sides,
like crime, trespassing, and littering, generally do not manifest themselves to any great degree. Based on the
information presented in the master plan and that which was garnered from local public meetings and in- field
interviews during the planning process, it seems quite evident that the community value of the trail network being
proposed would be very high. This assumes that the personal values and issues defined by the residents and
adjoining property owners can be effectively addressed.
General Summary of Public Input
As noted previously, a great deal of emphasis was placed on working with the local communities and townships to
define local planning issues and determine which trail route options were viable and which were not. From an
overall perspective, those attending the public meetings held at the local level, and those providing input throughg
phone calls and letters, express a general belief that the trail network plan would indeed offer high communityvalue. Although not everyone would agree, this also seems to hold true for those that own property next to one of
the corridors and are therefore most directly affected by the master plan. Under the assumption that there is
general support for the trail network within the study area, the concern shifts toward defining, in good faith, waysY
in which the personal concerns of individual property owners can be addressed to diminish their level of
uncertainty as to the impact. a given trail will have on their personal property and quality of life. As part of the
public consensus building for.the trail network, local residents helped establish a set of expectations that they have
about how the trail master plan would be implemented. Expectations include:
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN Summary 3
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Local residents helped establish a set of expectations
that they have about how the trail master plan would
be implemented.
The CAC came to the conclusion that the overall value
of the trail network justifies its development.
Developing a viable master plan that is implementable
requires an understanding of, and empathy for, the
concerns of those most affected.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Property owners affected by the trail network will be given a reasonable opportunity to participate in the design
process to ensure that their interests and concerns are dealt with in a responsible and forthright manner.
Encroachment and direct Impact to private property will be minimized to the degree possible.
Trail and roadway designs should be based on the principle of providing a safe environment for the pedestrian,
bicyclist, and the driver of a motor vehicle.
Aesthetic qualities and sense of place within the study area will be maintained or enhanced
Master plan presented here should be used to define the key issues associated with each trail corridor and the
expectations of those most impacted by trail development.
The last point is of considerable importance in that many of those that accept the master plan do so with the
understanding that the planning agencies responsible for implementing the plan will adhere to these expectationsandcarrythegoodfaiththathasbeenbuiltupthusfarintoandthroughtheactualimplementationprocess.
CAC Community Value Conclusions
In consideration of the findings defined in the master plan, the CAC came to the conclusion that the overall value
of the trail network justifies its development and that the routes ultimate) selected for inclusion in the mastery plan
are those that offer the greatest community value with the fewest impacts to private properties and personal
interests. Whereas there were alternative routes that offered outstanding rail opportunities , the ones ultimatelgpp Yselectedwerethosethatwerethoughttoservetheneedwhilestillbeingreasonableandpracticaltoimplement,
everything considered. Other conclusions related to the overall community value of the trail network include the
following:
Demand for trails is well established. and will likely continue to grow in the future.
Past citizen - driven planning efforts and public input during this study suggest that an integrated trail network in
the study area would offer high community values.
In- field observations suggests that trail routes defined by the master lan are already being used b pedestriansPYgYp
and bicyclists even though no formal trail exists.
Public safety remains a major concern and is a significant factor in the selection of the trail routes.
Whereas the community values as defined above suggest that a looped trail network would be of high communi
value, developing a viable master plan that is implementable requires an understanding of, and empathy for, the
concerns of those most affected. Whereas the community values of the trail network are pronounced, the CAC
also recognized that inevitably every trail alignment affects varyprivatepropertiesandpersonalvaluestopYg
degrees. In light of this, the CAC was committed to working toward minimizing the direct impacts to p rivate
properties to the degree possible. In addition, the CAC asked the planning team to define the expressed concerns
and opinions of property owners and to determine their expectations related to the trail alignment and character
along each proposed corridor to ensure that those considerations were brought forward to the p oint of
impleme tation. Forthcoming sections of the report considers these issues in greater detail and defines the
development issues and constraints that need to be addressed as part of the implementation hase of the project.p p 1
Summary 4
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Section 111 —Trail Network
Master Plan
The final plan represents a network of trails that fulfill
the objectives set for the study.
The trail network consists of eight trail corridors,
which. tie into several existing or planned corridors at
the State, regional,: and county level.
Total trail mileage is 34.1 .
The trail network master plan is the end result of the planning and public resents arocess. The final Ian repp pnetworkoftrailsthatfulfilltheobjectivessetforthestudy. The master plan also represents a trail network that was
molded as much by the limitations of the planning area as it was by the opportunities it offered. In spite of hpppthe
challenges, it is believed that the trail network presented here offers very high recreational value to theg
surrounding communities and greatly improves pedestrian safety along the trail corridors.
The trail network consists of eight trail corridors, which tie into several existing r planned corridors at thegp State,regional, and county level. In addition, the trail network interlinks with a series of existing nd planned local trailsgpails
that, ultimately, will provide a seamless and expansive system of trails within the stud area. The followingollowing tableprovidesanoverviewofthetrailcorridorsdefinedunderthemasterplan. Total trail milegize is 34.1 .
Trail Corridor Description
Bruce Vento Trail North -south regional trail that extends the existing trail from Beam Avenue in Maplewood north intopCorridor (7.3 miles)Hugo, where it will continue on to link with other regional-levelgel trails. The corridor generally followstheBurlingtonNorthernrailroadalignment, as well as existing adjacent roadways.
Regional trail corridor that follows an existing trail corridor from Lions Park north along ake Avenuee
Lake Avenue Trail
Corridor (2.1 miles)on the west side of White Bear Lake in the City of White Bear Lake.
Regional trail corridor that follows the Hwy. 96 /Zephyr Line rights-of-way yfromRams Beach all theHwy. 96 Trail Corridor
10.3 miles)way to Stillwater.
Trail corridor that follows the Hwy. 244 right -of -way from Hwy. 96 south to the downtown area of
Hwy. 244 Trail
Corridor (3.5 miles)Mahtomedi and Willernie.
Trail corridor that follows Wildwood and Lake Avenues through the Citt of Birchwood. Given limited
Birchwood Trail
Corridor (1.7 miles)road right -of -way through this area, an on- street bike route is proposed for this segment.
Trail corridor that follows South Shore Blvd. from East County Line to Goose Lake area.
South Shore Blvd. Trail
Corridor (1.5 miles)
Trail corridor that starts in downtown Mahtomedi and heads south to connect with an existing rail 'g in
Mahtomedi- Oakdale
Trail Corridor Oakdale. This corridor includes a proposed pedestrian bridge across 1 -694.3.1 Miles)
Maplewood- Si.Iver
Lake Trail Corridor
Trail corridor that provides a loop around Silver Lake and then heads west along he northerng edge ofMaplewoodfollowingapowerlineeasementandlocal.streets to make a connection with the Bruce4.6 Miles)Vento trail corridor.
The map on the page provides an overview of the Lake Links Trail Network
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Summary 5
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Overall Trail Network Master Plan Map
Z {
t
ell
t
F
i
y
f I - LFC6N
p
i "" T
t
ti > ,. ., ;,- . _ .. "r1 _ I_ . ..:mot , ._ - ..° _ ", . • ;- , •..,,w 1 TRSNE REGdQf1t AML ROU .
trw ..accNAin
Iti y..: ;, ' ! ` T` q _..- - .. -. -. .r - ...,,, .,.,..,.- ...... :- .P.• .a•.•»,w.»,. ».w..,k. ,,y ! . , - : O f .., . .r , .,......... .. -.,. . ._.
i t '. ,', , .'! h ., L R' ' q" i .. , P + , , N,' •.
R . .. . ` 'µ ' (
Q Rte/•/ •o ,
d
7RJl (OPtI
77fili si LOCAL TRMt VITERNATE ROUTE)
t . ..Y : rr! '; . • s.,, r -...r •.• ar.,i ° _. ti - _ f .+,,.•a..r.- «.- ..._..:w .. 4+, .• ... 8 ''..
EXISTIN -
w ....
f ,:'"
s,,.• ..., • rY,. J. r+. .., .. .¢ w,, ,, 3 •.•.....y ... .i'..1i w. nU -e., y., r. "a f, , .. ,: ;'. .d .. .. _ .. „ a• , .>rs . .+...... .... 'y
TRAIL: 3 ` T” EXISTING COUNTY TRS+ULCORRIDORSTIT,t• MIiR $ : t fr.. +. :i..a., ; ', r.i ".',.. -.wr. f,VF1 wo.. +
COU
1
MTTY TRAIL.
b . j ry' CORRIDOR ' t
Q ' 3 _, _ .. _ _ {/ iAVENUEr . , ":.; _o - klallRl ..1. ,..,M•,P•L. UN
L cORR ( y - .F
1. y ••, . r ' ,.
fir -r"'1 ta...•..7.
y,y r. •y • RF 8 t A'_k n.' • ./ 4 .. . >.,. '. • y "''».,•. .ti ..!• „..,• •, • r O • . • .1 yM... • •
1 •. ...
BiRCHWOOD Q \ :TRAIL'
TRAIL CORRIDOR ".`n
a• -• ;. rA.t'•'
i
CORRIDOR
h
f .yq {
f
sss .• y
d' .... 1 : _.- .. .; _, ,,ft. t _ ,_,no.... --'w —T ..6....... .. :........ . ...... yy..... .,. y .. ."."""•'",,,,...,,, '..!y -#"P r..: a,r:.` . • " ?. ti, a
sovTy sHORE z LAW i :. ---
aw , . -i -aYw'1 .: , Z: •. '• . a o o `'^./Is71 . - Y r w. r . r,.. yr.., > • • .'.:1. 1 1 'u+ 1BOULEVIY1V. .. , '.f : , ,VM/ / r .." ...a,,u ! F «, ). ._r...» wi„.r Y i
rw . ] p /' / / c 1 its
e RAIL CORRI e .. wrq s: i e .fi . 1y., t . i { " ^W .
1Vir1L! RVVi. .......•j d ` k:• i ri vDORfft
J ° •'__ - y ... - ,. ::. 4 . .':. v,' OJP
a ••
f - e. i / .. C ; ..?` yq t , ^ ` tb ,...i .. •1 e t•*, • „ !!!f 'S , R ' !
y _ ,,,., j • . ' >w . ; ' . . .,., w , ,, ors
M ;, i, •`, •I- ® : ,T_•1.. ... ` J • _ - ....w i _.. - 1' -+ ..1 4'+.'r
LAW J4lAHYQMEDI -Q 3 .' j '" ' 3 . r', t l i 3 •, ' L 7 •f.;: *;-. —-» •..
w . 'IL4 - f c •o ' ,, r..t•. 7;, >'• - '1
w _ ASKI `-
i
Q.+> -:.. ( z .t1" R.[ . _•a., a- _.,. NcTC,Ncotr1Y ---f , ' ;,,.,.t •..+' .' -. i 3 ,.,,k,::.; r•i '. • 3WI `Y ; f , Z j ..',y 'f `., #,, "• ,' o •,il ,.,,r. . ', tut .t .,5. ' td• rl ,`,,. "VY_._`G • STi • •X i.lA}T1Q4 1'KNtAtOtVC w '`'
a4•.3 COUM WMD 1 a/ 4 .a' 1 • "t+f'•..trq BRUCE WIWO. . _ .- >:. ;- .. ,
f tr i f..., „.... r µ °r' a
e ! Ir Sv.TRAIL CORRIDOR A w k„ N L 'Qx t5ri'`'y..r . a,. n _.:.. -,. •,i 4 l :f' h •,'•a` .w 3 G ,,:.> r . i
NS Q r " , +,..- .•.•'.'. x ., ' ,... .. r ',,.•,:, '' ^ ..:1•..w...+:.._'.+.. w-., ,, ,,o.n,i:: .y ' , r. °'n ":.. BiMa„•, +.-^ y .n J ; .' a' i f' r , ' {" ,
Gy'F!,,.
St "' . t• rt.. ". G'•. #' y,
x
b nl, 'to i 1 1r "+ «..:I G3 r l••i4'"•r ti . 1 a t 'l d ...• •a Y A (:va.:'.......~- -. ••'..v - 1 ..., I " _ .,Mr,'S.w .. .,. ~ f r..
K. , •Y ,•_esr• .,:•P r• -••.••..... •n•++•..•...- s+......l+F. -.i - w... •.a- .i•.:ra•a.+•'.r- •ss.+... • " ..w,.1a '1t,•• ,.. r....,` r• >L .r1 •-.r .,f'y A Y' ka
a P ,•oSwy, ...M•,,,.uIti •,4+.w:rtY•r "y -T' n r
r
i
rr} « «•f ,. EWOOD,SII.VEIt : ,• - - ,,> k , ' :. „ ,,. _ "' . _ I .• ' s 1
ORRIDOR + D
JII
ulca TRAIL c -.. , { • . ...... -. . . _:.,.. ;.
i
IN
JM
r " $AUSIT
FINAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN
a EN , .. . , - ,_•
i - ..,r ••M • .. 1•+'1 .. ... ,l
tvr .., - 1
r. .: :.
rte. `r,• ...,..N . Y. Y ., 4 + + ` i ,
r ' <
rrlo s ” Yy-•--•-comtcnQN To _ -- LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK
lswr- _ _
CATE1 T s s • low WASHi. CTON & RAMSEY COUNTIEl $RJVLyx
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN Summary 6
SUMMARY STATEMENT
When considered against the evaluation criteria, it is
clear that the Lake Links Trail Network measures up
very well and that an interlinking trail system would
offer high regional and local values.
Trail Network Evaluation Against Stated Criteria
A set of evaluation criteria were applied to the master plan to provide an objective framework for evaluating
potential trail routing options. The following briefly summarizes the evaluation of the overall trail network against
those criteria.
Evaluation Summary — First Tier Criteria
Criteria I Evaluation Statement
Regional Values The trail network offers significant regional values, especially by providing:
An interconnection between existing regional and State trail corridors and between local communities.
A new regional -level recreational amenity that provides a new system of interconnected trails that
allows trail users to travel through several communities.
Local Values Trail network offers significant value to the local communities in a number of ways, including:
Providing a safe place for pedestrians and bicyclists to walk, ride bikes, and in -line skate.
Providing high demand recreational amenities for local residents to use and enjoy.
Expanding local trail options beyond the local community to create a larger, more complete system.
User Experience The trail network around the two lakes offers high recreational value in very desirable settings. Expanding
Values the regionally -based trail system through the creation of the Lake Links Network also provides extensive
recreational value by greatly expanding trail options offering a vast array of settings and lengths.
Evaluation Criteria Second Tier
Criteria Evaluation Statement
Natural Setting Even though the proposed trail corridors follow existing road and railroad rights -of -way, the lakes they
encircle along with interconnections made with regional parks and local parks /natural open space areas
offer high aesthetic and recreational value.
Separated Trail With a few exceptions, the Lake Links Trail network consists of separated trails that greatly improve user
safety and enhance the recreational experience.
Natural Since virtually all of the trail corridors follow existing road and railroad right -of -way, the direct impact to
Resource Issues natural areas is relatively minimal. Although trail construction (and roadway upgrades) will have some
impact to adjacent wetlands and natural vegetation in select locations along Hwy. 96 and Hwy. 244, this
can be kept to a minimum and any impacts would be appropriately mitigated.
Acquisition Since the trail corridors generally stay within existing road and railroad rights -of -way, acquisition of P rivateIssuespropertiesisrelativelyminimalandgenerallylimitedtoinstanceswheretheright -of -way is simply too
narrow for trail (and roadway) upgrading occur.
Although impediments exist, the inherent physical constraints along the proposed corridors arePhysical
Constraints surmountable and technically feasible to overcome.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN Summary 7
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Two of the corridors included under the Lake Links
Trail Network are designated as regional trails: The
Bruce Vento trail corridor and the Hwy. 96 trail
corridor.
The remaining trails within the network are defined as
local -level trails.
Encroachment Minimizing the level of encroachment into adjacent properties and keeping the trail /roadway cross - section
Issues as narrow as possible within the right -of -way is a fundamental objective of the master plan and of critical
importance to affected property owners.
Cost - Benefit Given the high demand for trails in the region, along with the high recreational value and improved safety
that these trails would provide to the surrounding communities, the long -term cost - benefit of Lake Links
Trail Network appears justifiable.
Evaluation Criteria — Third Tier
Criteria I Evaluation Statement
Public and
Political
Acceptance
Based on the results of the public process, there is a general consensus that the trail network would offer
high community value. However, there is also an expectation that the implementation of the trail would
be done with sensitivity toward minimizing impacts to adjacent properties and maintaining the character
of the corridors- it follows. Acceptance of the plan is also based on the expectation that local
communities will be directly involved in the implementation process and that local citizens will have an
opportunity to participate in the detail design of the trail (and roadways) in their communit
When considered against the evaluation criteria, it is clear that the Lake Links Trail Network measures up very well
and that an interlinking trail system would offer high regional and local values..In addition, the evaluation
statements suggest that while technical and public/political issues remain to be fully addressed as part of
implementing the plan, the actual development of the trail network seems very feasible
Regional and local Designations
Whereas the trail network master plan serves to form a cohesive system of trails within the study area, there is a
distinction between trail corridors that are locally -based and those that are regionally- based. As the trail network
map illustrates, two of the corridors included under the Lake Links Trail Network are designated as regional trails:
The Bruce Vento trail corridor and the Hwy. 96 trail corridor. These trails are given regional designation because
they meet the criteria as defined by Regional Recreation Open Space Policy Plan Update. This includes:
Providing access to or traverse through regional parks or park reserves and serve to link these parks together.
Providing linkages between existing regional and state trails.
Traversing interesting developed areas.
Traversing high quality natural areas.
The remaining trails within the network are defined as local -level trails (city, township, and county), whereby their
focus is on meeting local trail needs and providing connections to the regional and state trails. From an
implementation standpoint, the.. most important distinction between trail typ es is the potential avenues available
for funding. Whereas none of these sources are guaranteed, the inclusion of local trails within the Lake Links Trail
Network master plan_ shows the inter- connective nature of these trails, which in turn provides the platform for local
cities, counties, and townships to collaborate on seeking funding opportunities for development.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN Summary 8
SUMMARY STATEMENT
The master plan provides an extensive technical
review of the individual trail corridors defined by the
master plan.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Technical Overview of Individual Trail Corridors
The master plan provides an extensive technical review of the individual trail corridors defined by the master plan.
The purpose of the review is to more clearly define trail alignment and other important planning outcomes and
issues. These in turn will set the stage for implementing the plan and serve as an underpinning for continued
public input to ensure that the expectations of those most affected by trail development are ultimately met. The
following table summarizes the technical review of each trail corridor.
Trail Corridor Design Overview Major Issues
Bruce Vento A separated trail with a 12' wide cross- Uncertainty of future multi -modal transportation needs
Trail Corridor section is recommended to accommodate along this railroad corridor.
heavy use and a variety of users. Retrofitting the trail in areas where space is limited.
Ensuring that local residents have an opportunity to give
input into the detail design process.
Lake Avenue Enhancements to trail cross - section to Working with local residents to determine the type ofTrailCorridorensurepedestriansafetyisrecommended. improvements that are justified and add value.
Hwy. 96 Trail A separated 10' trail adjacent to the Retrofitting the trail in areas where space is limited.
Corridor roadway is recommended given the Ensuring that local residents have an opportunity to give
regional status of this trail corridor. input into the detail design process.
Hwy. 244 Trail A separated 8' to 10' trail as part of Retrofitting the trail in areas where space is limited.Corridor upgrading the roadway is recommended Ensuring that local residents have an opportunity to give
local input is needed on final width). input into the detail design process.
Birchwood Trail Maintaining existing on -road shared -use Ensuring that local residents have an opportunity to giveCorridorsystemisrecommended, with upgrades. input into the detail design process.
South Shore A separated 8' to 10' trail adjacent to the Determining which roadway cross- section best serves need
Blvd. Trail roadway is recommended, preferably Ensuring that local residents have an opportunity to g iveCorridorwithone -way road system. input into the detail design process.
Mahtomedi- Making connection between two Determining the best location for the crossing and workingOakdaleTrailestablishedtrailsviaabridgeacross1 -694 with MNDOT to actually implement.
Corridor is recommended.
Maplewood- A separated 10' trail along the powerline Retrofitting the trail in areas where space is limited.
Silver Lake Trail in Maplewood and completing the loop Ensuring that local residents have an opportunity to giveCorridoraroundSilverLakeisrecommended. input into the detail design process.
Summary 9
SUMMARY STATEMENT
The timing of turning back some of the roads within
the study area from the State to the county, and from
the County to the local city or township is an
important aspect of implementing the master plan.
It became clear that these routes were either not the
best option and /or would simply not be
implementable and therefore did not warrant further
consideration.
The interconnection between. the Lake Links Trail
Network and existing and planned local systems is a
fundamental objective of the planning process.
Turnback Status of Roadways Affected by the Trail Corridors
The timing of turning back some of the roads within the stud area from the State to the count and from theCountytothelocalcityortownshipisanimportantaspectofimplementinghemasterIan. Turnback essentiallygpreferstoashiftofresponsibilityforupgrading, maintaining, and operating a roadway from one agencypgygcy to the otheraspartoftheoveralltransportationplanfortheregion. The master plan rovides an overview of the roadsp that fallundertheturnbackprogramandtheircurrentstatus. Roads included in this ro ram include:p g
Hwy. 244 — State to county turnback
Hwy. 96 — State to county turnback
County Road 94 / South Shore Blvd. — County o city and towns turntYtyp back
County Road 154 / Hugo Road — County to township turnback
The turnback schedule associated with each of these roadways is quite important to a number f 'Y q p o the trailIcorridors. In reality, the development of the trails along these corridors will be lock-stepped with the 'pp e timing of theupgradingandturningbackoftheadjoiningroadwayfromtheStatetotheCountndfromtheCountyttothelocalcitiesandtownship. Also, the design for the roadways on the turnback schedule would follow the standardsdefinedbyMNDOTandtheCounty. Note, however that both Washinggt and Ramsey Counties recognize thatsomedegreeofflexibilitymayberequiredinordertoincorporateatrailalonghesecorridorsandregpreservetheirexistingaestheticqualities. As defined by this master plan, there is also the expressed desire b localpy residents tokeeptheroadwaycross - sections as narrow as possible to help alm traffic and maintain the existingsting sense of place.
Alternative Trail Corridors Considered During the Planning Process
A number of alternative trail corridors were considered during the planning process. Whereas these routesgp wereultimatelyexcludedfromfurtherconsiderationforvariousreasons, some of them held reat promisegpe when first
considered against the first tier evaluation criteria. However, when measured against second and third tier criteriaterra,it became clear that these routes were either not the best option and /or would simply not be im lepyp mentable andthereforedidnotwarrantfurtherconsideration. Note here that while each of these options did not 'p make the finalplan, some of them continue to have merit as part of local trails sterns and in some cases mY y be worthy of asecondlookshouldtheprimaryroutesdefinedbythemasterplanfailtomaterialize.
Interconnection with Local Level Trail Systems
Note that the interconnection between the Lake Links Trail Network and existing nd planned localgp systems is afundamentalobjectiveoftheplanningprocess. While the master Ian focused on the Lake Links Trailrail Network,the local trail systems play a significant role in creating a comprehensive network of trails that provideppde a safe placeforpedestriansandbicycliststowalk, ride bike, and in -line skate.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Summary 10
SUMMARY STATEMENT
The trail design guidelines that would be applied to
the trail corridors (and roadways) defined by this
master plan would follow those commonly used for
regional, State, and Federal projects.
Trail (and Roadway) Design Guidelines
The trail design guidelines that would be applied to the trail corridors (and roadways) defined b this master IanYYpwouldfollowthosecommonlyusedforregional, State, and Federal projects. The use of these guidelines is of1gimportanceforacoupleofreasons
To ensure the development of consistent and safe trail corridors that are in sync with accepted ndesig practices.To ensure that the trail corridors qualify for various trail funding programs that are sponsored at the
Metropolitan Council, State, and Federal level.
With respect to trail signage, the master plan also calls for adherence to the reviousl defined des manuals apYg swellasthosepreparedbyMNDOTthatrelatespecificallytotrailandroadwaysYe. g g
Support Facilities for the Trail Network
The trail network master plan itself does not call for
development of any major new support facilities.
One of the advantages of developing the trail network is that it links together numerous existing rks and publicgppspaces, which in turn offers an important side benefit in that many of these areas already have or will in thefuture, facilities that support the trails. This includes public parking, restrooms, icnic spaces and sittingpp g areas. Inaddition, connection to the downtown areas of the local communities rovides ample op forpppptYrefreshmentsandfood. Since this rather extensive infrastructure of facilities already xists the trail neyok master
plan itself does not call for development of any major new support facilities. Note, however that the detail designforindividualtrailcorridorsshouldprovidetraillinksfromthemaintrailstoexistingsfacilitiesalowithgppgthenecessarysignagetoensuretrailusersareawareofthesefacilities.
Affect of Multi -modal Transportation Plans on Trail System Planning
One of the factors that was considered as part of the planning for the Bruce Vento trail extension along he
Burlington Northern railroad corridor was the potential for use of
g
p that corridor for multi -modal transportation,which ranges from buses to light and heavy rail. Whereas there is a reat deal of uncertain as to where 'g uncertainty this will
ultimately lead, it is clear from various Metropolitan Council transit studies that some form of transit use of thecorridorcanbeanticipatedinfutureyears. With this understanding, the intent of the Lake Links Trail Network
master plan is to set the trail within the Burlington Northern railroad corridor on the eri her of the rppyorevenoutsideofit, wherever possible to minimize the potential for future conflicts.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Summary 11
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Section IV— Implementation Plan _
Implementation of the Lake Links Trail Network will
require strong collaboration between local cites,
townships and counties if a cohesive and complete
trail system is to be realized.
Implementation steps.
MASTER PLAN ADOPTION
LOCAL REVIEW AND
REFINEMENT OF TRAIL
CORRIDOR DESIGN
OPTIONS
cou NTY /
TOWNSHIP/CITY
AGREEMENTS
GRANT APPLICATION(S)
IMPLEMENTATION
Local cities, townships, and counties are encouraged
to pursue implementation of the plan as a singular
priority.
Collaborative Underpinning
Implementation of the Lake Links Trail Network will require strong collaboration between local cites townshipspandcountiesifacohesiveandcompletetrailsystemistoberealized. While each of the trail corridors p pro osedoffersnumerouslocalbenefits, the real opportunity lies in the broader vision of the lan that would result in a trulyYexcitingregionalassetofferingoutstandingrecreationalvalues. In many ways, the collective value of the larger trailnetworkisgreaterthanthesumoftheindividualarts. Through
g
p ough a shared common vision, opportunities forbecomingahigherpriorityforreceivingnon -local funding can be enhanced over that which would otherwise be
available to local units of government. Given the potential costs associated with implementing the Ian thesepgplan,outside sources of funding will likely be needed to offset the fiscal Limitations facing ocal cities and townships.s. p
Implementation Strategy
implementation of the master plan will require a coordinated effort between local communities townships, andcounties — starting with the adoption of the master plan. This, of course, is based on the collective understandingthattheoptionsforeachofthetrailcorridorsdefinedinthemasterplanaresubjecttolocalreviewandrefinement
as part of the implementation process. This statement is critical in that each of the trail corridors defined by theplanraisenumerousissuesthatwillrequireadditionalpublicinputandlocalevaluationtodeterminethen
approach best suited for the community design
while still achieving vision
g
ty ng the vlslon of the master plan. It is within the spirit offlexiblecollaborationthatsuccessinimplementingtheplanlies. The image at left outlines the implementationgpstepsrequiredtomovefromthevisionofthemasterplantoactualdevelopmentofthetrailcorridors.
Local involvement in the implementation process is of critical importance iven the detail design issues that needggtobeaddressedpriortothedevelopmentofanyofthetrailcorridorsconsideredunderthemasterplan. Forexample, at the fundamental level, decisions related to basic roadway configurations and cross- sections will have
to be made prior to designing the trail itself. Likewise, inherent transportation issues (such as those associated with
the South Shore Boulevard trail corridor) and roadway turnback schedules will also have to be addressed as p art oftheimplementationplanning. Of equal importance is the need for additional nublicinputintothedetaildesignppg
process to ensure that the general public and property owners directly affected by a given trail corridor have a
reasonable chance to participate in the design process to ensure that their interests and concerns are addressed in
a responsible and forthright manner.
Implementation Priorities
The master plan does not establish specific priorities for implementation of the individual corridors. Instead Focal
cities, townships, and counties are encouraged to pursue implementation of the Ian as a singular priority with thepgptYrealizationthattheIpaceofimplementationwillbedictatedbyseveralfactors:
Timeframes associated with making final: design decisions on specific corridors.p
Degree of success In assembling funding acka es from various sources.p g
Turnback schedules and timing of upgrades to roadways associated with a given trail corridor.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Summary 12
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Realistically, there will be a degree of variability in the
timing of implementing the plan due to the variability
of the challenges facing each corridor.
Assembling an implementation team to oversee the
detail planning and design process and coordinate the
activities at the local and county level is
recommended.
The cost projections presented in the master plan
define the potential costs associated with each of the
trail corridors defined by the master plan.
Another reason for taking this approach is the interlinked and dependent nature of many of the trail corridors,
whereby one trail corridor cannot be easily separated from another and therefore precludes establishing a clearly
defined prioritization schedule. Although a homogeneous timeframe for implementing the plan would be the best
case scenario, realistically, there will be a degree of variability in the timing of implementing the plan due to the
variability of the challenges facing each corridor.
Implementation Team
The importance of maintaining an ongoing and coordinated effort between local cities, townships, and counties
toward plan implementation cannot be overstated and will be critical to the successful implementation of the
master plan. lacking this, the probability of seeing the plan implemented becomes far less certain. To this end,
assembling an implementation team to oversee the detail planning and design process and coordinate the activities
at the local and county level is recommended. This is particularly important here where a number of the local
cities and townships simply do not have the day -to -day staffing needed to oversee the project and keep it moving
forward in a timely, well - coordinated fashion.
It is recommended that the team consist of a representative from each of the cities, townships, and counties
affected by the master plan (which was essentially the basis of the Technical Planning Team assembled for this
project). In addition, the implementation team can also serve to coordinate and act upon grant opportunities and
assembling funding packages. It is also recommended that the implementation team include representation from
select outside public agencies with experience in trail development and grants.
Acquisition and Development Cost Projections
The cost projections presented in the master plan define the potential costs associated with each of the trail
corridors defined by the master plan. The cost figures are intended to be used for budgeting purposes, project
phasing, comparing the relative cost of one item to that of another. Although the cost projections are intended to
be conservative, it must be recognized that the actual costs will vary depending on detail design and market forces
when the plan is implemented.
The cost projections for development are broken down into two primary categories:
Base Cost Projection for Trail Development — refers specifically to the cost to develop the trail itself without
consideration for other development concerns that might be necessary for the trail to actually be developed.
Cost Projection for Associated Development — refers to development that may be required to construct the
trail, such as roadway upgrades and alternatives to the base development package as noted.
The following summarizes the development cost table provided in the master p Ian.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN Summary 13
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Trail Development Cost Projections
Trail Segment Base Cost Projection for Trail Development Cost Projection for Associated
Development
Bruce Vento Trail 21012,000 to 2,414 626 to 751,200
Lake Avenue Trail 655,000 to 786,000 0 to 0
Hwy. 96 /Zephyr Line Trail 2,500 to 3 280,000 to 336,000
Hwy. 244 Trail 11560,000 to 1,872,000 2 to 3,372,000
Birchwood Trail 447,000 to 536 0 to 0
South Shore Trail 575,000 to 690,000 0 to 0
Mahtomedi - Oakdale Trail 700,000 to 840,000 0 to 0
Maplewood- Silver Lake Trail 1,060,000 to 1 160,000 to 192,000
Total Cost Projection for All Trail Corridors 9 to 11,410,800 3,876,000 to 4
Construction Engineering and Design (15 %)10426,350 to 1,711,620 581 to 697,680
Grand Total Cost Projection for All Trail
Corridors
10,935,350 to 13,122,420 4,457,400 to 5,348,880
The cost projections for land acquisition for the various trail corridors are intended to be used for budget
estimating purposes. The intent is to project as accurately as possible a range of potential costs for land acquisition
that would be in addition to the development costs listed above.
Land Acquisitions Cost Projections
Trail Corridor Cost Projection for Acquisition*
Bruce Vento Trail 260,000 to 310,000
Lake Avenue Trail 0 to 0
Hwy. 96 Trail 406,000 to 470
Hwy. 244 Trail 225,000 to 420,000
Birchwood Trail 0 to 0
South Shore Blvd. Trail 0 to 0
Mahtomedi - Oakdale Trail 60,000 to 75,000
Maplewood - Silver Lake
Trail
150,000 to 200,000
Total Potential Cost Range
for Land Acquisition
1 to 1,475,OOo
Range of potential costs is shown to account for some unknowns.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN Summary 14
SUMMARY STATEMENT
Operation and maintenance of the trail corridors will
be a shared responsibility between the local cities,
townships, and counties, with the responsibilities of
each defined in joint powers or other forms of
agreement.
By creating a recreational value of greater significance
than would otherwise be the case, the opportunities
for funding from a variety of funding sources opens up
substantially.
Once the initial promotional campaign is complete, it
is expected that word -of -mouth will be the most
successful promotional tool.
Operations and Maintenance of Trail Corridors
Operation and maintenance of the trail corridors will be a shared responsibility between the local cities,
townships, and counties, with the responsibilities of each defined in joint - powers or other forms of agreement. The
trails will be designed and operated to accommodate walkers, joggers, bicycling, and in -line skating. There will be
no provision along these trail corridors for other activities such as snowmobiling, horseback riding, or cross- country
skiing. With respect to rules and regulations, all trail corridors will comply with the standards of use currently in
place for local and regional parks and trails as defined b city and county ordinances. This will ensure consistenc
in operation of the trail facilities defined in the plan with others found within the study area. Law enforcement
associated with the trail will be covered by local police and county sheriff's departments in accordance with
current practice and established relationships between the two counties and Local cities and townships within the
study area. With respect to fees and charges, the trails will be open to the public without fee, which is in line with
current practices at the local and county level.
The responsibility for developing and maintaining the trails will depend on whether the trail is local (city, township,p
or county) or regional and whether it follows a local or county road. A table in the master plan considers
development and maintenance responsibilities for each of the trail corridors based on standard practice.
Recognize, however, that the responsibilities of the local cities and counties is subject to change in line with
specific agreements prepared as part of the implementation process. An important side note to this discussion is
that development costs could be significantly offset through special appropriations and grants at the state and
federal level for local and regional trails (and roadway upgrades). Given the inherent limitations of local units of
government to fund these projects solely on their own, finding alternative means of funding ill be an importantgpfactorinactuallybeingabletoimplementtheplan.
Funding Options and Opportunities
One of the major advantages of the Lake Links Trail Network Master Plan is that it paints a broad vision for trails
within the study area that collectively offers benefits beyond those of the individual local trails stems. B creatiYYg
a recreational value of greater significance than would otherwise be the case, the opportunities for fundin g from a
variety of funding sources opens up substantially. Equally important, this collective vision can also serve to raise the
level of priority given to these trails over what might otherwise be the case. In this context, collaboration between
local cities and the county can go a long way toward being successful in securing he funds necess to build thegrytrails. A table in the master plan provides an overview of potential funding sources.
Public Awareness
Once completed, public awareness of the trail network will be promoted through the local cities, townships, andcountiesthroughacoordinatedeffort. This would include trail network map brochures flyers others and soY , posters ,forth to make residents aware of the new trails. Once the initial promotional camp is complete, it is expectedp pthatword -of -mouth will be the most successful promotional tool.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN Summa 15ry
SECTION III - TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Maplewood - Silver Lake Trail Corridor Technical Review
Overall Corridor Description / Character
The Maplewood-Silver Lake trail corridor starts with a connection to
the existing trail along Hadley Avenue that ends at the intersection
with Hwy. 120 /Century Avenue. From there, the trail provides a loop
around Silver Lake, including tying into the city park on the south
shore of the lake and Joy Park on the north side. From the Joy Park
area, the trail traverses through public open space west of Hwy. 120
and continues west following an existing powerline easement until it
reaches the Maplewood Mall area, where it follows the County Road
D right -of -way. Once west of the mall, the trail again follows the
powerline easement until its connection with the Bruce Vento Trail
Corridor.
Although the trail corridor skirts the Maplewood Mall area, the
powerline easement, coupled with frequent public open spaces and
parks along the way, provides a very pleasant trail setting with
relatively high recreational value. The loop around Silver Lake
provides high recreational value as well and serves to link two
community parks more cohesively together. Taken as a whole, this
trail corridor is both a key local amenity as well as an important link
within the larger Lake Links Trail Network.
Trail Route and Design Options and Recommendations
The trail route is fairly straightforward along this corridor in that the
trail would be located either within the powerline easement or nearby
road rights -of -way. Since the trail serves to connect regional and local
trails and parks together, a separated trail with a 10' wide minimum
cross - section is recommended to accommodate heavy use and a
variety of users, including walkers, bicyclists, and in -line skaters.
Overall Trail Values Gained
Taken as a whole, this trail corridor is both a key local recreational
amenity as well as an important link within the larger Lake Links Trail
Network.
Trail Mileage this Corridor: 4.6 miles.
Location Map of Trail Corridor
y -- - - - -- -_ -- —.
N .v ,At '
F <.,: ;. ;.- ;* i r • -WP E
y.l .j' a rrrR1CXAw111R /61N'- Ji7W11RQtllt'.
sF ' 1iRNR1[ Rmr
46 y•
TRAIL coRRI.QOR
y + : RVAt MA* :4X114 #UU ll
C ttttii llt+ r. 'r 4 : - ., ;
y , ; 1 "" "" yd lf1/l f RCPT t rfXM1Ra#L It
Sam 1. r
a
Y
r ti1SIrNG ttiiNlr FRwR
t l: r F" tsA• 7 .wrr ti ... 1llNC'15iUCtY.10 TRill W
KYIlMURY <-
pon z
r :„ r; i: ... .%!' . ,,, . , `c -_' `+••• - ..'.. ' .f.. - .:. :' '_- . :•N E ... ... 2f ri +
N
t
2" 71 ».i.' _'r .. c';t a .w , A.+ 1a r }` t'-. na:. r - t• _ ... 7 :k '_ r ` 7tlr'u
taw. fi mom a rte^
F S'` urit
r _
1 r il I _. c_s: { 5 f _*.[4i1 F
t
w
y
r Yi
d
yt.. ,:: a.:.. y. t 'i:: „,c`. -SF• .....A..,.,.t......- r .,r ; .- _ ._.+, 4•L
r : * . .:., _. 1 . ;' S. _ ` i . - r • 4 ..,- % :'s. _ '` '7
A00 31 Noun
x 'h^{, #'may- ....kt -
J`. :4.-
4 •_, N z ' - -a-. , f„y '. c } .
zzt
e.,
wit -4
7` d•.. __ .r. id } err + y .'" " 1'r.: a ya a
Gx 1 I u ."; •' S yyY !' } '
L" xc Via. :.. _.•. - ::. .N..,.a a.-"' _ 1' '! i Pi kj Fl Yff'ir
r
t
r .. • . '.:.q .,. .• - .• - f a • .. - ¢ ,rr y + f " . +J ;e,.+r+i jno
Vii;=
a r, a e-a
r 'a i ' F'.- ', . i' - __ ' w, -vr: f .lr .,.._ ..•,_ f. A: - d.; $'ram ,r . K. ,,,,. +i,.. + :. _ w- 5:,:. T . . r 'f ..' 4'i`- ' p; ,i _ } w '•.
tA" 't*AIL
L 4
w
P
r
Y. i5itr~ ; :,a: ; k. S ENT 1 ;FINAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN'
rE ulcr LINKS T>rAn.NEn+w
t
Summary of Public Input/implementation Expectations
Public input into this trail corridor was generally very positive, with most of those attending the public focus
group meetings considering it to be of high recreational value and an important part of the larger trail network.
The idea of looping the trail around Silver Lake was particularly well received, especially adding a separated trail
along Hwy. 120, where it is known to be unsafe to walk along. The public also responded favorably to the trail
following the powerline easement.
As for implementation expectations, the most critical factor is making sure that those that are directly affected
by the trail (especially those adjacent to the powerline easement) have an opportunity to give input into the
design process and have a clear understanding of options available to address their concerns. This especially the
case along the powerline easement between Bellaire Avenue and McKnight Road, where right -of -way and
property ownership issues are likely to be a bit complex. Also, aesthetic qualities and privacy issues are
concerns requiring detailed review with affected property owners.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Stt.I JUN III - I KAIL NL I WOKK MA5 I LK FLAN
Maplewood - Silver lake Trail Corridor —
Segment 1 of 5
Segment Description / Overall Character
This segment of the trail corridor entails a trail route around Silver
Lake, which effectively ties together a couple of city parks and public
open spaces to form a significant park, trail and open space amenity
for the local communities. Since an on -road trail route already exist
on the west side of the lake (Lake Blvd.) and an existing trail is located
within the park on the south side, the critical missing links to
completing the loop are developing the trail along Hwy. 120 and one
through boy Park (which will. be master planned by the local cities in
2001).
Development Issues / Constraints
Specific issues include:
Retrofitting the trail along Hwy. 120 will likely require some
shifting of the roadway to the east to create adequate room for
the trail. Adding a curb and potentially a retaining wall (as shown
in the character sketch) may also be required to fit the trail along
the road in this area. Also, retrofitting the trail along Hwy. 120
from 54` St. to 51 St. will impact about 10 driveways, which will
require special attention and input from the property owners.
Which trail /roadway option is best suited for 20` Ave. (as defined
on the right) will require input from both the city engineer and the
adjacent property owner. Given the low traffic volumes, striping
and signing the road would provide a reasonable short -term
solution with minimal disruption, assuming that it proves to be
safe after initial testing. From a long -term perspective, a separated
trail would be the preferred option, if the on- street option proved
inadequate.
Upgrading the trail within the park on the south shore will be
challenging due to lack of space in certain areas.
NATURAL NATURALVEt.ETATK)N VEGETATION
F - X SHOLILEFRS TRAIL- -
Tr OWNG LANES
D"NAGE CURB WITH z -
E
y
DUCH SHOULL)ER
The character sketch illustrates the location of the trail relative to
the existing road and lake. Given space limitations, an urban
road section with a curb to create separation is likely needed.
Note that several options are available for making the
connection from Hwy. 120 to the existing park following 20'
Ave. including: 1) striping and signing the road for an on-
street bike lane; 2) a separated trail directly adjacent to the
existing curb line; and 3) turning the road into a one -way
street and putting the trail behind a relocated curb that falls
within the existing road cross - section. Which of these options
proves most effective and appropriate requires additional
evaluation at the local level with input from the adjacent
property owners.
Private Property Encroachment / Acquisition Issues
Since the trail stays within the public right -of -way, property
acquisition will not be an issue.
Specific Trail Values Gained
Completing a safe loop around the lake creates a significant park, trail
and open space amenity that offers very high recreational value. I
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN Segment 1
Photo 1 - looking south along Hwy. 120ICentury
Avenue with Silver Lake off to the west (right) side.
Shifting of road may be required to retro fit trail.
Photo 2 - looking west along 20 Ave. from Hwy. 120
toward the park. The trail would be on the right side of
the road.
Photo 4 - looking north along Lake Blvd, where an on-
street bike lane is provided. Given the light traffic
volumes, this approach has proven sufficient to
accommodate bicyclist and walkers.
Photo 3 - looking west along 191h Ave., where the trail
traverses through the park. The trail is in need of
upgrading.
y , 1f '_, .j -, ... ? ..,`a'AP.. .. ". ;. "'.' : I : t :F : _ :{
5jY•'x'° '' +t'' .., ., .''kA^' :.:',} J ak ':
i .n .. '•. Y r "7,F ':'P,{' I: _ ?,d ' . A 1 a 't`U
L X14 ' "4' $,, ,
t
M1, M PM• ,.. ,. \.' .. !Aa 'NME V '1 4
y T
r
g q
9 .'7 YLr-A
n.
I*BK ,aE' NED
i '`Rrff} , is Q ".,.a.. 1. h• :, , ra,: e.n + , g
h. Ih •, ;1 " 1g_: t $, lA ` h 4 1 Q F •JAYn Y A .R . ,PRK' L:Y1 .,,i: 'Id'•tx. . •r. .,,ik ,, 1} ytK'
law _ _.... , q. - . "at 1 , P i '•.. ' . r ::' 4n !i 4;
q. ' }}-. M. 4- t.'M.. ., -...- ... . -1. ' -• .L... +.
i'x u.1 AOIS• T
C9P V :., ', .. sal.. .. i . :. +. . , ' •4i ' ,
if
AFL
i b: '' w 5 1i
h G
YYAVF tA,
r - k .s :: •. ..9 r5 Atx. at. "s1' ' . 'w .: w at ;,:,. ;'
NE
IV
a .1 :S.
INN1 ' .' .'1C1'' .,• X . FF , .... • _. ,: ': A... alrl. .`' Y,•p . 4 4'. •'G»
ltom, .. " .,. . .,, » ., r. +• .. , ;. : c.:
tom _ -
vx
NN . :,rt 1L LO ON WEST SIDy' .CAT E
1
1
ST. P 1 raa .r OF ROAD ADJACENT TO
a
l e . W DOROTHY PARK w
a 3T OF EXISTING ROADWAY
PAVEMENT WIDTH
a•
p
y ALT
80 STREET
f
k : .
N
a r T E ET R.O.W.
i ••.F. •a - ^' f, 1 `'1if '
h „ THIS SEGMENT
L` ' SHIFTING OF ROADWAY WITHIN EXISTING
a 4 SILVER1 •kA; Y R.O.W. POTENTIALLY NEEDED TO
y
t
LAKE 'r
ACCOMMODATE TRAIL ON WEST SIDE
r *,a 1 E - e ' r -. L R ! t:a,. !„'. ,. , r, ` •
A ! = .,'` ,
J
y ,
F
a t
p" •
X11
SLOPE FROM ROADUY1,. A
r '
7p r r
M ;
EDGE TO LAKE EDGE (3 O QTR ; } ' wA. . % t
t
N
WITT + .
y M
rl,.. •
TL !
T' is R " 'i:
1 b SCiL ,f. , !'"1• , My1',. .i'.. ,. A
i ' -.,, •:1.P+ .,.,kII alb, Y%..ri.r7i.
4` ..
a.
1APPRX1RESIDENTIAL
ill ,t: • sj, ,,, e. e+ •. ,:, . ,:.:; r. ,any '' .
k f ' '
A.aF , k. . :
r' ',
y IPROPERTIESWITHDRIVEWAYi
C •. w ,. '; t"c'7( -,ACCESS ARE LOCATED IN THIS Aff
War" amp FWAft
Y,s P ) +,• "' 4 t
NWAfav
Fla,
a. - .N °' Is. n1AA fi: . " R ,, , _ : ' .,,F •: c
lea
t ,* eta ''1"•.
f 4w1^
yy.. Y
44poet* oft ONE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTYti
aa; ` .' . •
1 `
am ,M r k "1'sr ` w da •1,
yy,
ALONG 20TH AVE L
y ,
i
I' 9
CTS TO ON TREET E,
UAW
T .RA((y. N -S it L
1 } = BIKE LANE ON LAKE BLVD. r
y
A 1 • L
S
tw :tt TRAM LAYOUT WITHIN PARK NEEDS TO BE
1{','i 11 r - ` ` tx: r ,,',
I r Pyy• "c`' . w ` E«lhr. rr 1'' f ,:.:,"COORDINATED TURF CITY OF N. ST.CO WITH N
Sil• AAA..,
vt
4418..L PLANS FO DING > a it. 4
4 `
DA
9
Al
Aw LAW
t
L'
i
Mm4: 4 :, •4'u' s 1 ..• n„ ... _ - hl r 9 ' ' T Ik
1
Ilty 0
wf
1 +, u
a.. gR
A
L
W txy
Ia, _ 4 ice"' t; s ;: , , ... :. h « •::; o- ' ' I' ` 'o- ";a' < ..1% Y 1 lVI
a:
t,
sw
lM. ;V
J:.
u.. _ - 5- .' M. u _.,1r1ii._ 1,.. f':I1R
yyjyyp
t
SEC: I ION III - I RAIL NE I WORK MAS I Eft ULAN
Maplewood - Silver lake Trail Corridor -
Segment 2 of 5
Segment Description / Overall Character
This segment of the trail corridor starts at Joy Park and heads west first
through public open space and then follows the powerline easement.
The public open space in particular provides an appealing setting for
the trail. Whereas following the powerline easement is preferred and
received strong support at the public focus group meeting, an
alternative route is also shown and could be used if the easement
following the powerline cannot be gained. While the alternative route
is feasible, the space is limited and the setting is not as pleasant as the
powerline alignment.
Development Issues / Constraints
Specific issues include:
Gaining easement rights along the powerline will be the most
challenging part of developing this trail corridor. Working with
adjacent property owners to ensure that thei r concerns about the
trail can be effectively addressed will be important_.
If the alternative route is used, retrofitting the trail adjacent to
County Road "D" will be tight, but technically feasible, especially
if an urban section or one -way road configuration is used.
Private Property Encroachment / Acquisition Issues
As noted above, gaining easement rights along the powerline is the
most challenging aspect of this trail alignment, along with addressing
the encroachment issues associated with adjacent properties.
Otherwise, the trail would be located within a public open space or
road right-of-way and would not pose any significant acquisition
issues.
Specific Trail Values Gained
Locating the trail within the public open space offers very high
recreational value, as would following the powerline easement.
The intersection of Hadley and Hwy. 120 is currently not
signalized and poses a significant safety issue in that the
traffic speed and volume makes it challenging for a
pedestrians and bicyclists to safely cross the street.
NATURAL
VEGETATION POWERL
GRADE LINE PROVIDES -
VISUAL BUFFERING FROM
ADJACENT PROPERTIES
f---19 TRAIL
PRIVACY FENCE IN -
SELEcT LOCATIONS
The character sketch above illustrates that the trail could follow
the easement and offer a pleasant setting. As shown, there are
also a number of techniques that can be used to buffer adjacent
properties.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN Segment 2
Photo 5 — looking west from Hadley Ave. toward the
intersection with Hwy. 120.
Photo 6 — looking. west from Bellaire Ave. toward the
powerline easement, which offers ample space, but also
lies behind a number of private residences.
IWpl
A
OIL
041
Y'a .. ,,ff:x. r5'.,_: ::.. a
41 1
4
WIIM- L
L IANUM
ai+i
AM
TRW
4JS L7
fr Air K, 4Z
4.
L .Amy U m
V Will
5{'{ f . f. ie i' ,. ' r ,l!. r .r .7ITi: — 4 . ; Yylfi , ri+A%•
IV
V.LV SM I
Y_ T 4 m 4. A
4F
L! 47
x
TH
L
A A.,1116. '
1 >. "Y'Gd " > r
J / .: ,; .:<
i,i } ... :fix: W. r .
I,.: - - £r,- ',G `•+, t, i-4 q. . e. i'4; - ''w:: „-^`c. Ae .., .vii% _ :a . ' ,
UMITIE R
ARFA`#ARMGL,
a: i ]F 1. .N •v14 -..,yi . #- :r V `a:PAP
n n '.M. "A, ti / °4. .ylnr 1ti l p " 'r - %'4ei 5. : i ' hr.:K '!Y
0, AD
V ,; r .., , f yLAlf-
16, -r`. ,} .. n . -' +:,r:.. , +e. 1 _ 3 - ,,..._ ' ,, .' „fr' r. =.
wig
14Ni •
T Al4L,
a.
Q0U it
WAAN
E
yF :,•5: WY3 .: w?.'d" -.. , r, ,. .. -, ...- _... k, :. . ,... -. ..... ... , o- l .:. ' M' .:..:::.. aM'F. .:ns .4 L.. ,:r,P S . N ,1. :., rs .. , - . H. .: , _ f • , Fp
1. ,. .. r ... .. .,+,`. .. ,GS ... w.. Jd: ,.. .a. :.. .• •7. ., ..." .`cll'+"^.'. tl::5:.'t71,<
AV
f 04
e AA
A
tt '77
R 14-
V y 7. d .> ' ,a. n.. .:: 1Ln. 7. .tF ,.iJMI•. a. ,. A. , -:.rr ' -'+, rr.r. M r a!'•ASE, .T SI:. - ?.P.,,,.
moo AW-Lilik"'
oil" ..T
1 ,". , . F..s ' .' iY.,'Y 'I t a .:: ,R. a .. :,. '.. Yw. 1 All,A—A
gyp,
Irl A-
Ad "
Iry tip
Iil.
d1a ti }
FLLUX, 24 ^ t
ORN
Maw
sm 11 illillollill IWAM
r.
bill;
TM 41+ rl
7T.
PARK r .., „':.a :V^ Y',• ,, .;x ...: n {., ,- :
Pff IQRop!F11-:AIMOWAMMI
mfr.
r
9 . ,..:. .. +,y ,.
at ,I."t •.. r .' .. •..,, ,• ,• -:i. d' _ _ yM. ,r.r:" ;i$.' ,r}FL• t „u "
1.
p .:' ru •'. d„ :.N. 2a `,pY ,4 ,r,. ` ' " .fir` I i '', , rs i:.
Fw , . ;: E I„ „r ,, t Y d6 : .. :. 3. "`,:Iti1l, ., .; r''d•: :f; , :'}J.; •-
14klh
W/IAIR'' ,, a ' :t
Qr 4..1.. '.' -:J'
r.:r .:l.,L:. :. L..., ... ry ::, .: I_,.., t - ..:,,., .,.. 1 r: ., r FsIY, ,.S• AI„ F - r:.J, _,. ., :.. 1, x::.' , , :., h. , F {
lad.
IN
y
t
t kr -
GRM
Aki
Ami Ll Ill IF
y : . '^J -.Y •' CA', a . :. •'.,
tl!:':. a . /., .. 1h .W. '.' .. 1 !':
SECT ION III - TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Maplewood - Silver Lake Trail Corridor -
Segment 3 of 5
Segment Description / overall Character
This segment of the trail corridor continues to follow the powerline
easement heading west toward another large public open space
parcel. As with the last segment, the public open space in particular
provides an appealing setting for the trail. Again as with the last
segment, following the powerline easement is the preferred route,
although the alternative route along County Road D is also shown.
Development Issues / Constraints
Specific issues include:
Gaining easement rights along the powerline will continue to be
the most challenging part of developing this trail corridor. Working
with adjacent property owners to ensure that their concerns about
the trail can be effectively addressed will be important.
If the alternative route is used, retrofitting the trail adjacent to
County Road "D" will be tight, but technically feasible, especially
if an urban section or one -way road configuration is used.
The mid -block crossing of McKnight is one of the drawbacks to
the powerline alignment and will require in- depth technical
evaluation to determine its feasibility and what alternatives may
be acceptable.
Layout of the trail through the public open space should be done
in concert with a master plan for the area.
Private Property Encroachment / Acquisition Issues
As noted above, gaining easement rights along the powerline is the
most challenging aspect of this trail alignment, along with addressing
the encroachment issues associated with adjacent properties.
Otherwise, the trail would be located within a public open space or
road right-of-way and would not pose any significant acquisition
issues.
Specific Trail Values Gained
Locating the trail within the public open space offers very high
recreational` value, as would following the powerline easement.
ti 4 f
EXISTING VEGETATIVE
EXISTING BUILT FEATURES BUFFER RETAINED
AND VEGETATION WHERE POSSIBLE
ADJOINING `
PROPERTY B' MIN. TRAIL-
ROAD UPGRADED TO
MEET CITY STANDARDS
LCURB CURB WITH 2'-
SHOULDER
The character sketch illustrates the trail located on the north side
of County Road D with two -way traffic maintained. An
alternative to this is going with a one -way road, which effectively
narrows the road trail cross - section by 12' -14'.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN Segment 3
Photo 7 — looking west along County Road "D', which
illustrates the limited width of the existing road (239
and adjacent R.O.W.
Photo 8 — looking north along McKnight at. crossing
point, which would be mid -block across four lanes.
Photo 9 — looking west at intersection of County Road
D" and McKnight, where the crossing is controlled by
a four -way stop.
Photo 10 - looking west from McKnight into the public
open space and along the powerline easement.
47
A
4k
1 0
4 jL
46- Q;
t A
ITMoNkP
jl I b r7kx.. Pv
0e WK WT
7AW
7
IAt 2m ME
trXI
At APW
J aL m
tA ' , 4 1 ". 1 , .AF.2tVo "P
T-aw
WtXV
W .OOS E CDf'%A -- Tt
lipkxXJ Ojk"PW R
I - : , '. -1
J4,
71,4, A RNATEJRAILM
6,MENT IS4VALN ON 1"2771"
C,E 0- CH E, Q QWNYY ROAD,
ru Aw Pd~
alOak
4
win
too
J,
IlkNF, APUBLIC, -7W,
E/PAR 1SPAC Z
a. AM,
AU I LV ISTING-
nL , !
S
v,J VIflati "SE T
vowtF' 0A`-
7, irJ
A7 A
Ap
T 1
A.
M
AV
L
r ge.kA qA
Mawr"
VA fit
AK 4L 1 0
jam
IJ
7
ir hL
RY%
A WL
6 47k7i--AF7
WL
Ift now,
SECTION III - TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Maplewood - Silver lake Trail Corridor -
Segment 4 of 5
Segment Description / Overall Character
This segment of the trail corridor heads west from the public open
space by following County Road D (in the public right -of -way) from
Arial Street to Southlawn Drive, where it once again finds its way back
to the powerline easement. Whereas this segment is less interesting
than the others along this corridor, the right -of -way is of adequate
width to accommodate the trail in a relatively safe manner. Also,
although there are some at -grade crossings to contend with, there are
fewer than might be expected. The most challenging of these is at
White Bear Avenue, where although the crossing is signalized, it is
also fairly wide and will have to be well marked.
Development Issues / Constraints
Specific issues include:
The at -grade crossings, especially White Bear Avenue, will be the
most challenging design issue, although each should be technically
feasible.
Gaining easement rights along the powerline will be an issue -
albeit with no residential properties adjoining the easement,
perhaps less of a challenge than further to the east.
ADJACENT
VEGETATION
Private Property Encroachment / Acquisition Issues
As noted above, gaining easement rights along the powerline remains
an issue. Otherwise, the trail would be located within public open
space or road right -of -way and would not pose any significant
acquisition issues.
Specific Trail Values Gained
Although not as pleasant of a setting as the public open space and the
powerline easement, the trail still offers significant value by providing
a safe travel way for pedestrians and bicyclists in a very busy area with
heavy traffic volumes.
1Q' TRAII IN PLACE OF
EXISTING SIDEWAI K
BOUIEVARD
EXISTING COUNTY ROAD •D'
CURB
The character sketch illustrates the trail located on the south
side of County Road D, where there is adequate R.O.W. to
provide a boulevard between the trail and road.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN — _ Segment 4
Photo 11 — looking west at the intersection of County
Road "D" and White Bear Ave., which is the most
challenging at -grade crossing to contend with.
Photo 12 — looking west along County Road "D ", where
the existing sidewalk is close to where the trail would be
located.
Photo 13 — looking south along Southlawn Drive, where
the trail would be located on the west (right) side of the
road and tie back into the powerline easement.
r: r, -y;, F. N' - r„t'; ,. ( ..'::a :d'r :,.. -- Sik. L! {y"•4F•,• ;Za, ::L" - xr:a' - -y ,. .,. ... '- '.: °:..: `. ,,. ,. L ,_ •v., V(/ .Rw q" ;'' - i ±3r,:s¢ "fr" $ Tf. ...`..,,al'4 - n.. :,Y r 4 .rN C.: f :R4V" r : K ',' 'n, • • 'a a {r'f,' t.r'
R 4'J, _' yrod "I.'•,.'r .. r:.... t`, ' k•' ' ', L ..N4,r` ra,.'•IfEr. ,. . , dn.:. .rr,, t' '.7r' i. :. : p r'.(e '.": "t _ .•} i ,
1" - - .xr !':,'p.,.: ,. - :,:: - ...:: .7 - . :+•r,. u .. ,' :, :: ,p „* ,,,•.,:. .r ',4t`u! ,i t :, a t+}r'.M.:,yyL`: r >: o-. ' - -' r .; . :': • " _' °. ''. r°(',`+'v.. l' ''f. t . ° • aLr "FY:::::a ''ty'..,r . " '
r .. ,: ,. , rT, ,txtrr. .. :t; ', > - '<,. " - r; p.. :i:,u .;.% > $'
r
x " r - y- „ ''•, '.;” +fit
y4',; .r :, - ' '' - ', y. y : .:• ::. ., `ate, "u ' ... ` i p` i , }a t-• ii'r* 'p ' -f ,,'` .'
l ag'
r '.•'L•, f 'v "r ! o- :Yx n krf' p .i '
k. ua7id{',r •1T;4'.:'?h• i v h :' :h :', ,3. :ti ry *. '
J. 'i. %. r:''}, ;r
x -.
1`Y
w ¢ ,al IP:.,rp : ti;}' ' 'p o` "M' ale i :,' : •,,
h' 11 fir, 't '. 1` p ,., p f N,. :M . 9 ,t t" ^a'f, 1',d.,m
K ... v ,y. bt'C ..' : -
ya p
r1v '' Y•.' Jkr - .. .. >,
Lis 1'' . \• Y . ,,,,tt T. 15• t t •' +
Y, ny r •y'hrJ '•'mod Rp,.:'. , ti :'p' : 1X . re.`+aa(r 1 U r .r,,,,.
r taw ,. ;,'. - * .k °' 't. ,.,y°' "' , *::r
1 9 1 6r AG.
r,b' .iy v4° i '. @ Gst> wflb ' ,Y• , S.
i- -.. r € "ti : r. :_ ,. ..,.;} r."; ,. .' ,.. r " a a ..'f J av",•" k1 . o- ,• e'., t,' .::7ir : rP:'- ,> r; ; ;>. y ,d "
v
a "1 '" n ,r; r •*
X5,","1'
y ,';i .s . Yt'1"' " " ` ' g,'..: rfG P. sc t t : , - „,f; yk9 Vii. :o'.
v` - J },;.:'' f i• : "4y • .5'v: ?'Jalj{N 'vaK'Y.F?,'G 't etl'rSiiY h
a p:a Y r,F
r y v
x , .y
1 -• • 'a 1. :: ., - '. .. :,..... '. i T, ".': ...r . e.,r't....W '_ r, r• r ,. fi. # , ti k . #..:ter > >J is .... . , :"kl'iu' _ . , .. ': . , .: .. • + : •” - : .:d• . Y , f.IIHci•, r. s1G ,> .S. r - r. :m r. : 'f' :. R .. s , i;?& aa ' ...; '.. -skiR. _ ,... .: :. ... " .:t ".rte•, -, ,,: ,.. ,
1,
w S r -R +. ' _' ... ; . . '.,:. .. ` :. :, 4x+ .t ,• ',: 4 ,,. 4 _ , ...:.. . r- ,. . , _a"F. k, z ''.Nrb. err..µeyv e ..: - , ::. ..+ a : . .+. _ " r r,.u,',
r > {W• a < .r o• ., b ,hE. .. „ .., =r;'! rni.: r r. ':''t+'' La.
r• , -a +. " .. y . ,> -f ,:} ,. d' ,.. .,:. -r '. , ,3. :r :,. , .y q,+'. 9- .f :.('^,M •:'.:`. ,. ,'. :.µ' L.•:.
r: "'• 7F , fi.: .4 L{.. t < ?7nxlYr u , f ''.- o ''.'C` .•}. • a ;f` ;,vJ' • _
yv
i
w C.:it 3 w wSA a
w_ .. - , y r "TTe• ...1°. y: t: .. -.q All '
wio. b2•Pn,.... br. ny:' - _..,,..y hlYJ;,- :.:.... : ::_ r - ,{.;, _#' ,." .., .- ... .. -+m. - _ .. :'iJ -' Ta :,,, ..
r _, "' _ ..ytk. :. ,, ., ,•r xdr -r .,;. -_: :,- - =` .. ,. .. - :. _ :. a .,!G1>l' .!4, . 7,d 1 ,b ' ." ,• Svl: , . : Sk'.. ,
v,., -.4
r
N pi.
t.tra.- a
r,a,k' .F s Dc,: y.,'e' >•-r P u a:..,y y.,, a y: {. •A:; h,.. .!, , , aa._ ..e $.E.i. +l''... r.a, Yb.. . .... ., .
ti`.';n'... ,.... , ._. .. ?9t rlEw;a?u,, ;ra`- r. >, ti._,,...x,.. rmwNptiptd•." .,. - ::.p"w!Sb, jwS', ...w ` ':^r ..r. . .. ;r.
vr , rxs y.rre F Por'1tlIRHUTa` "WT yqr _. a v :.
p,A^:' ^•p:$^, sparlye'mmx!c . .. c _ ,. »: - r.o..,•.<,..iF4. +'v':qna• t_:, a,!: ftf.;v .i.•.: >ws:. a,.. .v:.. . g, av,':i"4 ;p°1",."ppp,i"'• . ",;lYt'i9hr,: . 'r4,`, -.f' °m"u . 'R•r'•t!4{4'y •wwg`,r',Ze'r k'' :l,r
TE 94To-^+•"tiwtr = a+.
r., •rrr ,. .,a+..'wr'enW x,
8.
cA* arvrn: «k+sm;:R+;u'554,vtbk.9?w9i. rc;3.. .:..a „A,: ., . - c.. .!; t= s!:, Rrorrdr•> r+* t,• rrtrrn •,+.w•.ti.ra.vriursb'....,V .„u,;n•.':+.rw•J.w .,w,:, .., +Y.^q'v'iM..*,nM n,•F. , rVK ",,,
yyw . >•ve•sKA : mNCmlha.-” YwabDko4• I,• r-. s., w' vzr: e• a,: rw." ar^,• r!{ Rw;•4•Mn'sUa.:ASa,ma. -. - a -.;. ..,.., ......,, .. - »:...:,r. ,<.
VERY7 - 797 Aer3fdAkillllAfMf d4, , ,. , ftb+wr r a>
J• ,- . - ,•,: •: ,. ,.. R,C.... _. :. .. "' ,... {. " :Y .. .- :..... ' ee+.^9 .W •I,r d, "!6lri.:.w ne .:} '.. ]: ..
W .
Mr. , . rWlr : r „ +xb•c "'Yd ,
5 - , - •. 3 - ..' r " ..
r ,
r
r,
1.2MO a
w•
e: $' ;;::_ ';;. t 4 n
1:+R:IFu• J.r ., . r.;8' +AMFt4a;r, .r ,al r7T .r •,s. : ,. ,.
4 k
I
4 :
DD .r
4
7-
IN ry
r 1 t.
F f StEi n
1a ..
IL v Y d.r"r. ..
1
1. . " 6 `,•' ''
i
7 .piImlff ,fifa
Ips r h:. ... :" .+BM°ir rk...ofk*. z vv v._r.rr ;-x ae,w'. ... ,,,,,+.m >, .4.. :, ,•!:',, ,.. y.. Srn: -„•_ ':atJ ::, *d ::: ...:j,. y -
9. rM a r::.r:YF.p1. - . ,_v - '. ++"!:':. G .x t: '.. :.ta a:.: ." ,1i - v.
y _,• - '<:. -.. '`>`- :.. .. ., .,. .a. - r .._:''' o-.r T., >:. '- a.,. .;. c...: -.. .r w._ y ,. - -, , -. 81R. r -. ,_ ...a
wf n y«h'
tr J a^kN'J: ' jhaW Svd '• w vpa
eaw'i'.. r: ,bT'.' ,S r• .. . : ,:.v,,.b ,- 6.. r -,. ;: .. .. ,. 1. J SI. r .k «..
y
V yP t U
4 4 L S
PjxLtH { i rA F3L S .W .9
11 , r ,1 ' 4f
r
t:
r4
a .
r.M
i se.fXISTING r L fi
J .. , .,.
tT ,06r.: k::M. .. ':,.'.N6.r.:+61- ,.f.•:1, 11'r ;t iy p
r
PQ .a - :,'Q. ''''F - - - " .:. :. - a','?:•:.. ::...i.4 .,-' ..: yy. .; .v _ .,:r -'A - -.,` . "9• r , '1 ,.,V • I'.T
g S I P^ fTJa
y }iC { 1wNTM',:..s '.. ... •' .. .. -, - -: r :.: ',.. -: {,. Fyn: 4 f % :raps
Uh
4 .- - a .. _ '.. ...- . 3.:.. •. ^" .: ':" '. -.:'. :,., "{'..., ill ' -+k T 'w
f I r ]
pv r' F» 'r ar w k
yW F .` ° `
t :f `'`• '" "'` :J ; ` " yv rw :? .' .,. `
f
tt.
t rr
L
n
t r rF
r
i
r!han -» v
i!•" S'
py
f 1AJ9Ir YRc
t.i`
ry 1: 11 rar is9 -9 Y >a
Q
id
1l' ,
f a
t a
r
IL
f :
brak•
Fkrr
Irl
5
rx v L 4•
MAb !
P t -of t Y r T
K
1
c •rRxi'1 v
wy9 M1 iw, r Fr fT ..
jx, . .wrAl3lwyr•.. " Fr
riJYe
rratrau tLbby -,. r b.ly " "LY •,sP•n .y
1 ,.< aN 1 'R { ,Y: , , ":S ' , 8 ,ir • ... ... ..tIF •T t
R9Vii' y . * I"' ` r• } -
p
S :i
t,
yiakti
AltdT.Y
rt4 n ' y L. "Y •W'S''v. :.m. f• r kyk7 7C
a f vrxK5'• 5 . . a`kWi5Fr
i „p d'S
v p.v
F6"rgr _C 1 M 4ru
q:rfr,.4:
A
Ais1 ehr
S
J 0 xJb Nur
J r Gt ,y
av ,i ayJ, vif4c ,•f. it
r pr
t , .sN. 'i t;' p'F, y,•p"'r »,ur "yni MC.,..
w adi4y„r
T'L 7
1Y,:h. .
R ^'wK irr
s• 1 #_ a xr . ' i' • `R* Y i?@t ` i ,; i G,itl , r 4 .. >}:.Nf ` f .. ' i$'.'r } :T 's z rq }C a t .`r .F
iF.y ri
H k F
r f•y rtG,y
T} •lYk ru
K7 Yd 'r
d
u.pp Nr ".
y • n
r $
b
w w is a.1r
r K Prl4 T:7 - T77. {t LTisfII a
A1 w ..1'rra
t
pTrt1 .
r r
ipFi•„
a
ax
f'cr :Q . K ?K :" ' of m'W;L
irl m -
r y rr,
r Nr x a
f :raDCAU "X'
wRaSwi , m<•yu"Y+.wiR3r .a'lRiSw ` A9g' .P,NY4te•a:: SOL
v w ,•
ho1K111•k,'h4 , r
a r
r 4 p:s .•r,r t<drslr,• ubR > ir!ye s a1Ynr$w` ; `a -
i. J. y.:t w :C•'. J': r1`v.i" .:rT < S..".. j F '',;' "... •p'i t t , ,
y :
Ir ,
J
r
fir_ It ,- ,4•
w-
7w1PJM :
r t -. , '
w aw • •' ';(: ,
Tr ,: ^.,'L asp.
t
t -,a
k _1:.1sJ S 1/
t
f.'. • k'J .fy d rr
R1'..1 P'
tY qtr rJ .S
t -e
orT'G Jr.e•
d A.It rJ '#4
mr c e . J e-
rl"k Syr >;;• '` s '' ,
r ,• , A Y: W ' ,ail . ' _ -
Yf..r - F i
z
r
x a•zr
J.1 •,r J k.t ,•
iPp'.raSS y1,1r
9 t SS 'S
r.1
5 di ri
I 4.
h •
55 .ft (1 i:.a Sh•sir
94fr n •+r JF $
u v r5 :. ``r•6
7 1 4'1 J!F
r'a,a r'4
r 5
1 d 5c
9.
r 4:•
m trY :Q r1•l ' P tj
i
ryat f pY `• 3rg z0.w ,et" (• -:.°' 'ify •k b' Jf 'd
ap
p,4
ar.Y '
t V•
J .t
y . E••.- E., l ao : M1: :1., 'N a :e - .'.'`
s. r.• ; ,,Mar,q{h,'.
i .- 'k4r.' +rrry!,f .,M1'r±'1AaiY,::^k'+ ''4:..'^ -"_ •. .Ir , "- i3lQj'!Ss ?F ' 4'- '
r C•: Hhm4Fa,
k a- iit'a" {bw•?k'n nY ,1•.z r' -i'+rr sw'N . +. .: {! s :. ,Cpae a i=n. -
ATritk
wJ"+ ' Y°'r" y_ , c^ .."':;2„ ", artS2}.'. 6h" w' wrF,' w: e-: rwc ,,, +''+,,•'a's'+F°"t^#' ' - r ,. _ 7A'r:"•"'.u• ;r
dl : +#
t
3
r a r'' f
rr_b7ak
Ipp
H aye, ,x'p.. •1
q
II r •li /t r4 Ir
d
r
y
r+
s,
SECTION III - TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN
Maplewood - Silver lake Trail Corridor -
Segment 5 of 5
Segment Description / Overall Character
This segment of the trail corridor heads west along the powerline
easement until it connects with the Bruce Vento Trail corridor near
the NSP substation. Since the area remains undeveloped, the
character of easement is similar to the other public open spaces
further to the east along this corridor. Aside from some grading to
make the connection to the Bruce Vento Trail and crossing a drainage
ditch, there are very few technical issues to deal with along this
segment.
Development Issues / Constraints
Specific issues include:
The at -grade crossings of Hazelwood Street is mid - block. Since
traffic volumes are relatively low, it should not be a major issue
but still requires more critical review as part of the detail design
process).
Crossing a small drainage ditch and making the connection to the
Bruce Vento trail are the only other significant design issues, albeit
very manageable.
Private Property Encroachment / Acquisition Issues
Gaining easement rights along the powerline is the only significant
acquisition issue along this segment.
Specific Trail Values Gained
This segment provides a pleasant setting for a trail and offers high
recreational value.
1. K)WM.INtS
The character sketch illustrates the trail located within the
powerline easement.
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN __ _ - -_ _ Segment 5
Photo 15 = looking east along the powerline easement
from the Bruce Vento trail /NSP substation area.
4 41own
gg
is
IV4AA!*W,_
vo ty,
1 , n
4i
ft.
pe
VIw: or ld *Mupw 4, !_ -'X
gri Q
VAV
i 1, w , -, "", "
Ww aft 1111 1
4 .4
4iW,Wv
YT
4. e
14
ki
siwpwftb6iii
Z0 UN Iml l
14 .6
TMIL.FOLLOWS
AT-G 1XISTINT -T Wt .--,
17MID-BL K
1- 4 , 101% EMWENTSSING
Ad-
A-MW
j4 , _
R'
ni
W. AC;
Tm
4t
JL'. 3ma dEfte
it-AS
A
t " IttVI
sW
Ai t- 14, 1
jL
APPENDIX B
City of Maplewood Trail System Map
LAKE LINKS TRAIL NETWORK MASTER PLAN Appendix B.4
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT Ammon by Council
Date
TO: City Man EndorsedYager
Modified
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Rejectedygeer
SUBJECT: Bartelmy Acres Neighborhood Street Improvements, Ci Pr 99 -13p Y 1
Modification of the existing construction contract, Change Order No. 1
DATE: February 5, 2001
The original amount of the contract is based on estimated unit quantities. During
construction there often will be increases and decreases in some of the unit quantities.
In this case, there were some more significant increases in approximately nine of the 86
unit quantities.
The more significant increases were due to:
1. Additional sewer service repairs that were requested by the residents and justified
by staff after the project began construction.
2. Some additional clearing and grubbing that was necessary as a result of the July
storm. Trees were downed on the construction site and had to be removed quickly
to reduce delays. The tree removal plan had not been implemented by that time.
3. The discovery of unanticipated poor. soils required an increase in earthwork and silt
fence quantities.
4. Additional driveway pavement and culverts were removed and replaced than what
had been anticipated.
With the approval of Change Order 1, the revised contract would be increased by
33,637.40 ( %), from $387,516.85 to $421,154.25.
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution and
change order to direct the increase of the construction contract in the amount of
33,637.40.
CIVIC
Attachments
jC
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered
made Improvement Project 99 -13, Bartelmy Acres Improvements, and has let a
construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and
designated as Improvement Project 99 -13 Change Order 1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 1 in the amount
of $33,637.40. The revised contract amount is $421,:154.25.
The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary
to implement the financing plan for the project. The project budget is increased by
33,637.40.
11/06/00 08:36 I D : MAPLEWOOD MFD FAX : 7704500 PAGE 5
CHANGE ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Project Name: Bartelmy Acres Improvements Change Order No.:Project Na.: 99 -13 Date: November 3 0
Contractor., Dave Perkins Contracting
The following changes shall be made in the contract documents:
Increased Unit
Totai
2101.511 Clearing &. grubbing LS 2,222.50 2,227.502101.501 Rornove CHAP /HDPE storm pipe LF 104 10.04 1040 -002105.507 Subgrade excavation CY 464 8.00*3,712.002123.610 Street sweeper w /pickup broom He 20E.5 125.00 2,562.502211.501 Aggregate base Cl. 6 T 237.41 9.50 2,255.402503.603 fi PVC, Sch, 40 sanitary service LF 348 25.00 82451.503 Replacement backfill for sanitary,
storm or water trench CY 705 7.00 4,935.002531.507 6" concrete driveway pavernont SY 186.5 40.00 72573.502 SIR fence, type preass.embled LF 300 2.50 750,00
33,637.40
Original Contract.3571516.85
Net Change of Prior Change
Order No. to No. :0.00
Change This change Order:33,+637.40
Revised Contract:421,154.25
Approved
Mayor
Approve Dave Perkics Cont ratting Inc.
14230 Basait En ineerRamsey, MN 55303
Agreed to by Contractor by
Title
AGENDA NO. K` "i
Action by Council
Date -
AGENDA REPORT Endorsed
Modified
Rejected - -
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director 49
RE: Ordinance Amendment - Compensation for Elected Officials
DATE: January 29, 2001
As you requested, the City Attorney's staff has reviewed Ordinance 654 which
was adopted October, 1989 to determine if it is compliance with state law. The
ordinance needs to be amended to change the salary increases from annual to
bi- annual to bring it into compliance with state law. After the ordinance is
adopted, current Council pay rates will be adjusted back to the pay rates that
were in effect prior to January 1 of this year. Attached is additional information.
It is recommended that the Council approve first reading of the attached
ordinance.
PAR NANCE\WP\AGN\COU NCI L. PAY
Kelly &Fawcett, P.A.
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W
2350 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MN 55101
PATRICK J. KELLY
SONG LO FAWCETT
STEPHEN KELLY
SIA LO
CHAD D. LEMMONS
KATHLEEN M. LOUCKS
ROBERT J..FOWLER
January 26, 2001
Mr. Dan Faust
City of Maplewood
1830 . East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 5 5109
RE : Ord.inanc e Am en din ent
Dear Mr. Faust:
Of Counsel:
JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR.
MCGUIGAN & HOLLY, P.L.C.
651) 224 -3781
Facsimile (651) 223 -8019
E -Mail: kelfawcett@qwest.net
I have received your 3 page fax regarding the proposed amendment to the ordinance allowing
annual cost of living increases.
First, to answer your question, the law codified in M.S. § 415.11 has been in effect since 1976
and has not changed since. The current Maplewood Ordinance providing for compensation for
elected officials is in violation of M.S. § 415.11 and has been in violation since the ordinance was
adopted in 1989. It is a subtle violation, but a violation none the less.
Because the current Maplewood Ordinance provides for an annual cost of living increase, each
councilperson and the mayor have their salaries change to reflect the increase in cost of living
each year. The statute, however provides that "no change in salary shall take effect until after the
next succeeding municipal election." M.S. § 415.11 Subd: 2. Maplewood holds a municipal
election each odd numbered year, where some of the council persons are up for election because
of staggered our year terms, and where the mayor is up for election every four years. Because
the election cycle is two years, the cost of living increase must also be every two years, or else
it - would be an impermissible salary change.
Enclosed please find the draft we discussed b hone today of the proposed amendment to thebyypp
Page 2
January 26, 2001
Maplewood Ordinances for your review. If you have any questions, please call me.
Respectfully yours,
KELLY & FAWCETT, P.A.
Robert J. Fowler
Encl.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE
PERTAINING TO COMPENSATION FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS
Section 1. Section 2 -23 is hereby amended as follows:
Section 2 -23 Compensation. Pursuant to Section 415.11 of Minnesota Statutes, the salary of the
Mayor in the year 2000 was Ten Thousand Twenty Three Dollars ($10,023) per year payable in
bi- weekly installments, and the salary of each member of the Council in the year 2000 was Eight
Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty One Dollars ($8,821) per year payable in bi- weekly
installments. Hereafter, the Mayor's salary and the salary of each Council member shall be
adjusted bi- annually based on the change in the cost of living over that two year period. Starting
in 2002; and in every even n i.11ibered year after, the cost of living index published by-the
Department of Labor shall be used for the prior two years to establish adjusted salaries for the
Mayor and Councilpersons. Such adjustments become effective on the first day of January and
bi- annually thereafter.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication.
Passed by the City Council of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on the
th day of , 2001.
Ayes-
Nays-
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM NO,L7 -•
J
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY MANAGER
Action by Council
FROM: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICIAL
date
Endorsed -
SUBJECT: GROCERY STORE INSPECTIONS M ied
Rejected
DATE: 1/31/01
Introduction: As a part of the Environmental Health program started in 1979, the city started to
license and inspect all retail food facilities. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture also licenses
and inspects these facilities, which is a duplication of effort and licensing. This same situation exists
in many of the other local health departments throughout the state. Both the Department of
Agriculture and local agencies have claimed the statutory authority to do this. Because of this dual
licensing and inspection, the Retail Grocers Association has now gotten legislation passed which will
probably resolve this issue one way or another.
Background: This conflict has continued because neither the Department of Agriculture nor local
health agencies have been willing to give up jurisdiction and the fees generated from licensing. In
response to this impasse, the Grocers Association has gotten legislation passed which gives the
Department of Agriculture the authority to delegate licensing and inspection to local agencies in the
same way the Minnesota Department of Health does for restaurants. The legislators who sponsored
this bill indicated that if the conflicts were not resolved, they would introduce a bill to prohibit local
agencies from licensing these places. We can then enter into a contract with the Department of
Agriculture to take over all responsibilities except that the Department of Agriculture, in not wanting
to lose a considerable number of facilities and associated license fees, has set up requirements for the
delegation that make it difficult or impossible for small agencies to fulfill. I would estimate that I
would spend as much time in fulfilling these requirements as I now spend inspecting the
establishments. Currently we just do basic sanitation inspections. If we were to enter into a contract,
we would then be responsible for all of the things the Department of Agriculture now does which
include things like product recalls, labeling requirements, product manufacturing requirements and a
laboratory testing program for food items. We would also be required to attend numerous seminars
and continued, education programs for the above plus submit extensive reports that the Department
of Agriculture wants on a monthly basis.
We have four major grocery stores, several superette /convience stores, and other such places that
would be affected. The current license fees generated for these places are approximately $17,000 per
year.
Discussion: The decision on whether or not to get involved with this delegation agreement should
be made with consideration toward the long term plans for the environmental health program. I
plan on leaving the city next year so whatever the outcome, I will not be here to see it through to
completion. For a one person agency, as we have here, I do not feel that the additional time, effort
and expense that a delegation contract would entail, would make it a worthwhile venture. If the
council chooses to continue with retail grocery store licensing and inspections, we must sign a
delegation agreement with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture in February, or if the council
decides to discontinue it, we must then send a letter to the Department of Agriculture stating this
decision to discontinue licensing and inspections.
Recommendation: I recommend that we notify the Department of Agriculture that we will be
discontinuing licensing and inspections at the end of this year (2001).
2