HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 04-09 City Council PacketCouncil /Man 't ger Workshop - 6.•00 P.M.
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, April 9, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 01 -08
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
I . Minutes of Meeting O 1 -07 (March 26, 200 1)
2. Minutes of Council/Manager Workshop Meeting (March 26, 200 1)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
1. Police Civil Service Commission Appointment
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Budget Changes for Wage Increases
3. Conditional Use Permit Review - Maplewood Fire Station Number 2 (1955 Clarence Street)
4. Conditional Use Permit Review - Wheeler Lumber Storage Yard (English Street and Gervais
Avenue)
5. Recreation Fund Budget Transfer
6. Approve Purchase of Loader
7. Temporary Beer and Carnival License - Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary
8. Resolution - Building Quality Communities
9. Approve Payment of Sewer Repair - 1353 E. Skillman Avenue
10. Approval of Plans and Specifications - Edgerton Park
11. Fee Waiver - Maplewood Historical Society
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. Antenna and Tower Ordinance Amendment (First Reading)
I. AW OF BIDS
None
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. NURP Pond Ordinance Amendment (Second Reading)
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Opting out of PERA -City Manager
2. Menards Building Exterior Revision Approval (2280 Maplewood Drive)
3. Council Meeting Date Change - Memorial Day
4. Dog and Cat License - Senior Citizen Fee
5. Gladstone West Neighborhood Streets, Project 00 -05
a. Approve Plans and Advertise for Bids
b. Order Preparation of Assessment Roll
C. Order Assessment Hearing
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for
this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make
arrangements. Assistant Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff
and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner.
We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect
for each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language.
Dl
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, March 26, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 01 -07
A. CALL TO ORDER:
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers,
Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
Be PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor
Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember
Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember
Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember
Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember
Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Councilmember Allenspach moved to aDprove the minutes of Meeting o. 01 -06 (March e 12, 200 1 ) as
presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
MI. Animal Licenses
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS:
1. Community Design Review Board Appointment
Appointed Linda Mae Olson to fill the vacancy on the Community Design Review Board which
runs through the end of 2002.
3-26-01
1
2. Building Official
Councilmember Koppen moved to -anpoint David Fisher as the Building-Official for the Cit of
Maplewood, effective April 9, 2001.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
G. CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Consent Aggenda as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
1. Approval of Claims
Approved claims.
2.
3.
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$36.00
Checks #53446 dated 3/7/01
$130.
Checks #53447 thru #53510 dated 3/13/01
$95,065.96
Disbursements via debits to checking ccount dated 3/6 thru 3/12/
g O1
$259,500.33
Checks #53511 thru #53582 dated 3/20/01
$152,569.15
Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 3/13 thru 3/19/01
$637,177.05 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$330,176.03 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 3/16/01
$26,710.46 Payroll Deduction check #83239 thru #83244 dated 3/16/01
$356,886.49 Total Payroll
$994,063.54 GRAND TOTAL
Rejection of Bid - Fire Department
Rejected all bids for the 95' aerial platform apparatus that was approved as p art of the fire
referendum. Staff has since seen new technology and equipment that was not available at the
time and would like to redo the specifications and go out for bid in April.
Resolution - Rush Line Task Force
Approved the following resolution naming Kenneth Collins as the city's authorized
Y
representative to the Rush Line Corridor Task Force and Councilmember Wasiluk as an
alternate:
3 -26 -01 2
RESOLUTION 01 -03 -023
Rush Line Corridor Task Force
WHEREAS, Rush Line corridor is defined as the North State Trunk Highway 61 transportation
corridor from Rush City through St. Paul; and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is committed to preserving this corridor for the future rail
transit alternatives; and
WHEREAS, The Corridor has significant transportation, safety, and land use. issues; and
WHEREAS, There are opportunities for a variety of multi -modal short term and long term
transportation improvements in the corridor, including bus improvements, commuter, light and
freight rail, multi use paths and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS); and
WHEREAS, The Rush Line Task Force consists of cities, counties, and towns from St. Paul to
Rush City; and
WHEREAS, The Task Force is considering transit improvements and land use lon g this corridor;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood wishes to collaboratively plan for multi -modal
transportation improvements to the corridor and for the related land use and development
impacts; and
WHEREAS, a Joint Powers Agreement is in place for the Rush Line Task Force to direct the
consideration of transit improvements and land use along the corridor.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Maplewood ratifies the Joint Powers
Agreement for the Rush Line Corridor Task Force and identifies Kenneth Collins as its
authorized representative and Julie Wasiluk as its alternate representative to participate as a
member of the Task Force.
4. Temporary Gambling Permit - Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary
rY
Approved a temporary gambling license for Church of g the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin
Mary for bingo, pull tabs and a raffle at their annual Spring Festival on May 5, 2001 from 11:00
a.m. to 9:00 p.m. and on May 6, 2001 from 11:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. at 1725 Kennard Street.
5. Frattalone's Highpoint Ridge Final Plat (Carey Heights Drive and Duluth Street)
Approved the final plat for Frattalone's Highpoint Ridge subject to the followin g conditions:
1. County recording the deeds, deed restrictions and covenants required b the city.
. Y
2. Developer recording with Ramsey County deeds for the following:
g
a. Any necessary drainage and utility easements.
b. All trail easements within the development.
3 -26 -01 3
6. Park Commission Annual Report
Accepted the Parks and Recreation Commission Annual Report for 2000.
7. License Fees - Aldrich Arena
Approved issuing food establishment licenses in the amount of $277.00 to vendors serving food
at a flea market that will begin in March and continue until early Fall at Aldrich Arena.
8. Purchase of Trailers - Public Works
Approved the purchase of three new tilt trailers for the Public Works Department to replace old
worn -out, obsolete trailers.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. (7:10 P.M.) Easement Vacation -Birch Run Station (Beam Avenue)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Mary Dierich presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following person was heard:
Claudia Ryan, Oppidan Investment Company, 5125 County Road 101, Minnetonka the
Applicant
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution which vacates the unused
public utilitv easement north of the Beam Avenue right-of-wav in the Birch Run Shoppin
Center:
RESOLUTION 01 -03 -024
EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Ms. Claudia Ryan, representing Oppidan Investment pp
Company, applied for the
vacation of the following - described easement:
The utility easement along the west line of Lots 7 and 8, Block 1, Maplewood Mall
Addition, lying north of the Beam Avenue right -of -way in Section 3, Township 9
p'
Range 22, Maplewood, Minnesota.
3 -26 -01 4
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. On March 5, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this vacation.
2. On March 26, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The
council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and
planning commission.
WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following
abutting properties:
EXCEPT PART IN MAPLEWOOD MALL ADD & EXCEPT PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE
NE 1/4 DESCRIBED AS: COM AT THE NW CORNER OF SAID SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 THEN S
00 DEG 26 MIN 21 SEC E 921.54 FEET ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SE 1/4 OF THE NE
1/4 THE S 89 DEG 16 MIN 25 SEC E 75.37 FT TO PT OF BEGINNING; THEN CONT S 89
DEG 16 MIN 25 SEC E 214.00 FT; THE S 00 DEG 43 MIN 35 SEC W 7.00 FT; THEN S 89
DEG 16 MIN 25 SEC E 350.00 FT; THEN N 00 DEG 43 MIN 35 SEC E 116.00 FT; THEN N
89 DEG 16 MIN 25 SEC W 533.00 FT; THEN N 00 DEG 43 MIN 35 SEC E 82.00 FT; THEN
N 89 DEG 16 MIN 25 SEC W 31.00 FT; THEN S 00 43 MIN 35 SEC W 191.00 FT TO POINT
OF BEGINNING; THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 (SUBJ. TO RD & ESMTS) IN SEC 3 TN 29
RN 22 (PIN 03-29-22-14-0007) and
SUBJECT TO ROAD EXMT; LOT 7 &LOT 8 BLK 1 LYING W OF WIDENED
SOUTHLAWN RD EXCEPT PART LYING ELY &SLY OF FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
LINE BEG AT & A POINT ON S L OF LOT 8 243.4 FT W OF SE CORNER SAID LOT, THE
NLY 361.01 FT THE ELY TO PT 204.87 FT WEST OF EAST LINE OF LOT 8 THEN N
231.69 FT THE EASTERLY 201.15 TO WEST LINE OF SAID WIDENED ROAD &THERE
TERMINATING (PIN: 03- 29 -22 -14 -0010)
all in Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described vacation
for the following reasons:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The city and the adjacent property owners have no plans to build utilities in this location.
3. The adjacent properties have access to public streets and utilities.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Allenspach, Collins, Koppen
Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk
3-26-01 5
2. 7:10 P.M. (7:17 P.M.) Maplewood Imports Building Addition (2780 Maplewood Drive North)
Conditional Use Permit Revision
Design Approval
a. I Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Boardmember Ananth Shankar presented the Community Design Review Board report.
e. Commissioner Mary Dierich presented the Planning Commission report.
f Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, for proponents or g� g p p opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Greg Madson, Senior Architect for Ryan Companies, Developers for the Applicant
Ralph Sletten, 2747 Clarence Street, Maplewood
Brian Teeters, Project Manager for Ryan Companies, Developers for the Applicant
Doug Mulder, General Manager at Maplewood Imports, the Applicant
g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Collins moved to ado t the following resolution aDproving a conditional use
p ermit revision for Ma lewood Imports to enlarge their motor - vehicle re air garage at 2780
North Highwa 61:
RESOLUTION 01 -03 -025
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Ryan Construction Company applied for a conditional use permit revision to add
vehicle - repair space onto an auto dealership building. The addition would be within 350 feet of a
residential lot line.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to Maplewood Imports at 2780 North Highway 1. The legal
Y g
description is:
Lots 97,98 and 99 of GARDENA ADDITIONAL OF RAMSEY COUNTY Minnesota
together with the west V2 of vacated English Street lying between the Easterly xtension
Y
of the North line of said Lot 97 and Easterly extension of the South line of said Lot 99.
The North 114 feet of Lots 16 and 17, KOHLMAN' S LAKEVIEW ADDITION Ramsey
County, Minnesota.
The Northerly 300 feet of Lot 14 and all of Lot 15, KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW
ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
3 -26 -01 6
All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the South east 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 4
Township 29, Range 22, which lies East of the Easterly right of way of Trunk Highway
g Y
No. 61, and North of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point distant 531.75 feet
West and 122 feet South of the Northeast corner of the above - described fraction of
Section 4, thence running Northwesterly at a range of approximately 66 degrees, 28
minutes, from said point 107 feet, more or less to a point on the Easterly right of way line
of said Highway No. 61, which said point is 90 feet Southwesterly from the point of
intersection of said Easterly right of way line with the North line of said quarter- quarter-
quarter section line except that part platted as KOHLMAN' S LAKEVIEW ADDITION.
The North one -half of Lot Twelve (12) of KOHLMAN' S LAKEVIEW ADDITION,
Ramsey County, Minnesota together with that part of vacated English Street lyin g within
the; SE 1/4 of Section 4, Township, 29., Range 22 and lying between the Easterly
Y
extension of the North line of Lot 12, KOHLMAN' S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, and the
Easterly extension of the South line of the North %2 of Lot 12, KOHLMAY S
LAKEVIEW ADDITION.
The North 300 feet of Lot Thirteen (13) of KOHLMAN'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION
Ramsey County, Minnesota.
The North Half (N Y2) of Lot Eighteen (18), KOHLMAN' S LAKEVIEW ADDITION,
Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, together with an
easement for ingress and egress over the West 10 feet of the South Half of Lot Eighteen
(18), KOHLMAN' S LAKEVIEW ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
The North 335.00 feet of Lots 73 and 74, GARDENA ADDITION to Ramsey County,
Y
Minnesota; and the East 40 feet of English Street, vacated, lying between the Westerly
extensions across said street of the North line of Lot 74 and the South line of the North
335.00 feet of Lot 74, all in GARDENA ADDITION to Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On March 5 2001 the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this permit.
2. On March 26, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council g ave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and plannin g commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
3 -26 -01 7
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surroundin g area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate ublic facilities and services q public including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
10. There would not be a significant affect on the development of the parcel as zoned.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be started within one year of council approval or the
pp
permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The property owner shall submit an annual report to staff on the sump catch basin
effectiveness and maintenance activities.
5. The property owner shall not park on the grass or landscaped areas.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Allensp ach, Collins, Kopp en
Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk
3 -26 -01 8
Councilmember Collins moved to aDprove the plans date-stamped February 20 2001 for the
building ex ansion at Maplewood Im orts 2780 North Hiah-way 61. Approval is sub'ect to the
property owner doing the followin
1.
2.
3.
Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
The applicant shall submit the following to staff for approval before obtaining a building
permit:
a. Grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plans.
b. A photometric - lighting plan if there would be any new site lights installed. This
plan shall comply with city lighting code.
C. A screening plan for any new roof -top equipment that would be installed that
would be visible to residential neighbors.
The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Paint any new roof -top mechanical equipment that may be placed on the proposed
addition. Paint must match the color of the building. Any new roof - mounted
equipment visible to adjacent residential property shall be screened.
b. Aim or shield any new site lights so they are not a nuisance to neighbors.
C. The exterior materials and color of the addition shall match the existing building.
4. Keep the trash storage and dumpster areas clean and picked up. If a problem develops,
the city may require additional dumpster space and/or an enclosure at the time of future
conditional use permit reviews.
5. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if :
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Allenspach, Collins, Koppen
Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk
3-26-01 9
3. 7:20 P.M. (7:39 P.M.) University Auto Sales (1145 Highway 36 East)
Conditional Use Permit Revision
Design Approval
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Mary Dierich presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following person was heard:
Steve Thorson, Attorney for University Auto Sales and Leasing, the Applicant
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use
permit for used car sales at 1145 E. Highway 36:
RESOLUTION 01 -03 -026
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Hossein Aghamirzai, of University Auto Sales and Leasing, applied for a
conditional use permit to be allowed to operate a used car sales business.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 1145 E. Highway 36. The legal
description is:
THE WEST 210 FEET OF THE EAST 480 FEET OF BLOCK 21, CLIFTON
ADDITION, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, SUBJECT TO STATE HIGHWAY
NO. 36/118, AND STATE HIGHWAY NO. 61/1.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On March 5, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this permit.
2. On March 26, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council g ave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this p ermit
because:
3-26-01 10
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existin g or proposed streets.
p ro p
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The site shall be kept in neat and orderly condition. The applicant shall observe the
striping pattern and not crowd the site by placing additional vehicles on the site beyond
what can be parked in the striped parking spaces. The drive aisles shall be kept clear of
vehicles. There shall be no parking on the grass or landscaped areas.
5. There shall be no vehicle delivery or transport /trailer unloading along the street. This
activity shall be kept on site.
6. Outdoor storage of any new or used materials other than vehicles shall be prohibited
unless such materials can be fully concealed within a screening enclosure. The design
g
and placement of any such enclosure shall be subject to staff approval.
3 -26 -01 11
7. The hours of operation of this used car lot shall be 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through
Saturday. The car lot shall be closed on Sunday.
8. There shall not be any car servicing or maintenance on the site except for minor work
such as battery replacement, minor clean up and spot washing. Mechanical repairs and
vehicle servicing such as oil changes are not allowed.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach
Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Collins,
Koppen, Wasiluk
Nays - Mayor Cardinal
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the site plan date - stamped January 31, 2001 for a
used -car sales operation at 1145 E. HiLyhwav 36 based on the findings re uired by the code and
subi ect to the applicant complyin2 with the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Provide the following for staff approval:
a. Revise the site plan to show parking spaces to be 9 %2 foot -wide as code requires.
There shall also be two handicap - accessible parking spaces that are striped
according to ADA specifications. The ADA requires eight- foot -wide spaces with
an eight- foot -wide cross - hatched loading space between them.
b. A plan for a trash dumpster enclosure for outside trash containers if used (code
requirement). This plan must show the placement and design of the enclosure.
Trash enclosures must have a 100 percent opaque closeable gate. Enclosures
must be of a material that matches or is compatible with the building.
C. A plan for parking lot repair. The applicant shall work with staff who shall
determine the extent of repairs needed after the snow melts. The repairs could
range from patching if needed to full overlay.
3. Complete or provide the following:
a. Install handicap - parking signs for the handicap - parking spaces.
b. A trash dumpster enclosure for any outside trash containers if used.
C. Stripe the parking lot at 9%2- foot -wide spaces with two eight- foot -wide handicap -
accessible parking spaces with an adjacent eight- foot -wide loading space.
d. Parking lot repair as determined by staff.
e. Repair or remove the fence.
f. Scrape and repaint the building fascia.
3 -26 -01 12
4. The applicant shall obtain building permits from the city for any interior work on the
building.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Collins,
Koppen, Wasiluk
Nays - Mayor Cardinal
4. 7:30 P.M. (7:50 P.M.) AT &T Monopole (1681 Cope Avenue)
Conditional Use Permit
Design Approval
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Boardmember Ananth Shankar presented the Community Design Review Board report.
e. Commissioner Mary Dierich presented the Planning Commission report.
f Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following person was heard:
Julie Townsend, representing AT &T Wireless, the Applicant
g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use
permit to allow up to a 125- foot -tall communications monopole and related equipment:
RESOLUTION 01 -03 -027
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Ms. Julie Townsend, representing AT & T Wireless, applied for a conditional use
permit to install up to a 125- foot -tall telecommunications monopole and equipment building.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 1681 Cope Avenue. The legal description is:
Subject to avenue, highway and easements and vacated street accruing, the following:
g
except the east 150 feet of Lot 1 and except the east 150 feet of South 73.3 feet of Lot 2;
Lots 1 thru Lot 4, Bronsons Subdivision. (PIN 10- 29 -22 -41 -0016)
3 -26 -01 13
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On March 19, 2001, the planning commission considered this request and recommended
that the city approve the request, subject to the staff recommendation.
2. The city council held a public hearing on March 26, 2001. City staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans as approved by the city, including the location of
the lease site. The director of community development may approve minor changes to
the approved plan. The applicant shall verify the location of the property lines and
existing site features around the lease area with a certificate of survey.
3 -26 -01 14
2. The applicant shall prepare and follow a landscape and screening plan that would help to
hide the base area of the proposed facility.
3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
4. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
5. The applicant or owner shall allow the co- location of other providers'
telecommunications equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions.
6. Any antenna that is not used for a year shall be deemed abandoned and the city may
require that it be removed.
7. The applicant or AT &T shall post a bond or other guarantee with the city to ensure proper
removal of the antenna and monopole and the restoration of the site. The
applicant /developer may provide a copy of the lease indicating a guarantee of the removal
of the monopole and related equipment with the end of the lease as a substitute for the
financial guarantee.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach
Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Allenspach, Koppen, Wasiluk
Nays - Councilmember Collins
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the site and design plans for up to a 125- foot -tall
telecommunications monopole and equipment building on the Property at 1681 Cope Avenue
based on the findings required by code and subject to the applicant doing the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued permits for this project.
2. Before the city issues a building permit, city staff must approve the following:
(a) A certificate of survey for the project area that shows the proposed new
construction, the location of the property lines and existing site features around
the proposed lease area. The proposed monopole and equipment building shall be
at least five feet from the property lines. The site plan shall be subject to city staff
approval.
(b) The applicant shall prepare a landscape and screening plan that would help to hide
the base area of the proposed facility.
(c) A grading and drainage plan for the project site.
(d) The plans for the equipment building. AT &T may use their standard aggregate
finish building but the color shall closely match the color of the Sheet Metal
Workers building.
3 -26 -01 15
3. The color of the proposed equipment building shall be submitted to city staff for
approval.
4. The monopole shall be light gray.
5. Before final inspection of and use of this facility, the applicant shall install the required
landscaping following the approved plan. If the required landscaping or trees are not
installed by the completion of the tower, the city shall require the applicant to provide a
cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be
200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be
completed within six weeks of occupancy.
6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor .changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Allenspach, Koppen, Wasiluk
Nays - Councilmember Collins
5. 7:40 P.M. (8:00 P.M.) NiJRP Pond Ordinance Amendment (First Reading)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one
came forward.
e. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the first reading of the following ordinance amending
the city code by adding the Nationwide Urban Runoff Pro ram OUM) design criteria for
pon ds:
ORDINANCE NO, 811
AN ORDINANCE OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE
CITY CODE BY ADDING THE NATIONWIDE URBAN RUNOFF PROGRAM (NURP)
DESIGN CRITERIA FOR PONDS
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
Section 1. This section changes the following parts of the Maplewood City Code:
(Additions have been underlined and deletions are crossed out.)
3 -26 -01 16
Section 9 -193. Generally,
f Where feasible, all new storm water detention ponds shall be designed and
constructed to meet the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program Qa
J ,desi g n
criteria of removin2 at least sixt y (percent of the phosphorous. The engineer
or designer may use the Walker pondnet model or the Pitt pond model when
designin! storm water ponds (as notedl the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA) Protecting Water Oualioz in Urban Areas manual) The
gpplicant or applicant's engineer shall provide the city engineer with the
necessary calculations to verify the pond design.
Section 2.
This ordinance shall take effect after the city council approves it and the official
newspaper publishes it.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
I. AWARD OF BIDS
None
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Ayes - all
1. AutoZone Parking Reduction Authorization (749 Century Avenue North)
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve a parking waiver for the proposed AutoZone to have
four spaces fewer than the code allows. This exception allows the applicant flexibilitv . in laving
out the site lan. This waiver would require at least 24 parkinLy spaces which is reasonable for a
building this size.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the architectural plans, date - stamped January, 18�
2001 and the revised site plan date - stamped March 19, 2001 for the proposed AutoZone auto
Darts store, 749 N. Century Avenue. Approval is subject to the applicant compl, ing with the
following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall:
3 -26 -01 17
a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to the city engineer for
approval. The plans shall address the concerns and issues outlined by Chris
Cavett in his report dated February 12, 2001.
b. Submit revised building elevations which substitute the single -score concrete
block with face brick on all sides of the building. The applicant shall also submit
a screening design for roof -top mechanical equipment that would be visible by
residential neighbors. Staff shall review these revisions.
C. Submit a revised landscape plan for staff approval providing for plantings in the
15 -foot setback area, a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees behind the building
and sod in all turf areas, not seed.
d: Submit a revised fence design for staff approval that uses cedar instead of treated
wood. The applicant shall coordinate their fence design with the neighbor to the
north to take their existing screening fence into account. The revised fence shall
be set back 20 feet from the front lot line so not to obstruct driver visibility. The
revised fence design shall be considered part of the landscape plan and shall be
subject to review board approval.
e. Submit a photometric plan showing the light spread from lighting fixtures. There
shall not be any lights behind the building. The lighting fixtures used shall be the
type that have recessed bulbs and lenses.
f. Obtain an access permit from MnDOT for the proposed driveway access and for
stormwater flow within their system. The applicant shall also follow MnDOT's
requirements for closing the northerly A &W driveway opening. This old opening
shall be curbed over and the ground restored.
g. Obtain a parking reduction from the city council to have four fewer spaces than
the code requires.
3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Install a handicap - parking sign for each handicap - parking space and a stop sign at
the driveway exit.
b. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and
driveways. This includes the area of any future driveway connection to the lot to
the south.
C. Paint the roof -top mechanical equipment to match the building color if the units
are visible. (code requirement) The applicant must also screen the roof -top
equipment from residential neighbors' views.
d. Construct the trash dumpster enclosure using the same materials and color as the
building. This enclosure shall have a 100 percent opaque gate. The gate material
shall be cedar to match the screening fence.
3-26-01 18
e. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas (code
requirement) except for the ponding area behind the building.
f. Provide site - security lighting as required by the code. The light source, including
the lens covering the bulb, shall be concealed so not to cause any nuisance to
drivers or neighbors.
g. Properly close the old A &W driveway opening with curbing and ground
restoration, subject to MnDOT requirements.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any
unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in
the fall or winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or
summer.
5. Signs are not included in this approval. The applicant shall submit sign proposals to staff
or review.
6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes - all
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. South Service Office Study
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the
report.
Council asked that staff renew the lease for the South Maplewood Office for another six months.
Council also asked that staff monitor usage of this facility and explore what the costs would be
for a permanent facility.
2. Project 00 -04, Tilsen South Neighborhood Streets
A. Approve Plans and Advertise for Bids
B. Order Preparation of Assessment Roll
C. Order Assessment Hearing
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. Director of Public Works Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
3 -26 -01 19
Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution approving_ plans and advertising
for bids for the Tilsen South Neighborhood Street Improvements, Protect 00 -04:
RESOLUTION 01 -03 -028
APPROVING PLANS AND ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on February 12, 2001, plans and
specifications for the Tilsen South Neighborhood Street Improvements, City Project 00 -04,
have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has presented such plans
and specifications to the council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part
hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk.
2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the
Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement
under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published
twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the council at 10:00
a.m., on the 20th day of April, 2001, at the city hall and that no bids shall be considered
unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond,
payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid.
3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and
read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids
received. The council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular
city council meeting of April 23, 2001.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution ordering_ preparation of
assessment roll for the Tilsen South Neighborhood Street Improvements, Proi ect 00 -04:
RESOLUTION 01 -03 -029
ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer have received bids for the improvement of the
Tilsen South Neighborhood Streets, City Project 00 -04.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to
be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land
abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they
shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection.
3 -26 -01 20
FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council
thereof.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution ordering assessment hearing for
the Tilsen South Neighborhood Street Improvements, Proi ect 00 -04:
RESOLUTION 01 -03 -030
ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING
WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at the direction of the council, prepared an
'assessment roll for the construction of Tilsen South Neighborhood Street Improvement, City
Project 00 -04, and the said assessment is on file in the office of the city clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 23rd day of April, 2001, at the city hall at 7 p. m. to pass
upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property
affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed
assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the
hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of
the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with
the clerk and that written or oral objections will be considered.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
3. I- 494 /Highway 61 Reconstruction Project - Resolution Approving Preliminary Project Layout
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. Director of Public Works Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to adopt the following resolution approving the preliminary
layout as requested by MnDOT for the I- 494 /Highway 61 Reconstruction Prop ect:
3 -26 -01 21
RESOLUTION 01 -03 -022
RESOLUTION FOR LAYOUT APPROVAL
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation has prepared a preliminary
layout for the improvement of a part of Interstate 494 and Trunk Highway Number 61 within the
corporate limits of the City of Maplewood, from the Wakota Bridge within the City of Newport
to Lake Road, within the City of Woodbury; and seeks approval thereof, and
WHEREAS, said preliminary layouts are on file in the Office of the Department of
Transportation, Saint Paul, Minnesota, being marked, labeled, and identified as I- 494 /Highway
61 Reconstruction project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said preliminary layouts for the improvement of
said Trunk highway within the corporate limits be and hereby are approved.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
Ayes - Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Allenspach, Collins, Koppen
Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk
4. Intoxicating Liquor License - Goodrich Golf Course - Bernard Diebel
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report and presented the specifics of the
report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the intoxicating liquor license application from
Bernard Diebel for Goodrich Golf Course at 1820 Van Dyke Street North.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
5. Ramsey County Election Task Force - Purchase of Election Equipment
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. City Clerk Guilfoile presented the specifics of the report.
Mayor Cardinal suggested that staff invite all of the election judges to a meeting, and possibly
put a notice in the Maplewood In Motion, so that they can express their election concerns.
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Several residents from Concordia Arms, 2030 Lydia Avenue, said that they are concerned about
traffic trying to take a left turn onto White Bear Avenue from Lydia Avenue and want a left turn
arrow put in at that intersection. Don Hahn, Manager of Concordia Arms, said that this
intersection is dangerous for anyone trying to make a left hand turn. Mr. Hahn also said that
there should be more time to walk across White Bear Avenue, especially for seniors and the
handicapped. Council directed staff to work with the County on this.
3-26-01
22
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Animal Licenses - Mayor Cardinal said he was asked if senior citizens can get a discount on cat
and dog licenses. Council asked staff to take a look at this.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None
O. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Collins moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:08 P.M.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
Karen E. Guilfoile, City Clerk
3-26-01 23
City of Maplewood
k CITY COUNCIUMANAGER WORKSHOP
Meeting Minutes
Monday, March 26, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
6:00 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL
Mayor Robert Cardinal
Present
Councilmember Sherry Allenspach
Present
Councilmember Kenneth Collins
Present
Councilmember Marvin Koppen
Present
Councilmember Julie Wasiluk
Present
Others Present:
City Manager Richard Fursman
Assistant City Manager Melinda Coleman
City Clerk Karen Guilfoile
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the agenda as amended:
F2. Park Board Interviews
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
D. COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD INTERVIEWS
The council interviewed the following candidates for the vacancy on the Community Design
Review Board:
Michelene R. Miner
Linda Mae Olson
Richard Oie
Diana Longrie -Kline
Richard Eugene Currie
DZ
The council proceeded to cast their votes. The votes were totaled and Assistant City Manager
g
Coleman said that Linda Mae Olson had the most votes. Ms. Olson will be offered the position
and appointed during tonight's council meeting.
i
E. OTHER BUSINESS
1. Interview /Appointment Policy - There was a discussion on how the Council would like to
handle Commission and Board interviews and appointments in the future.
2. Park Board Appointments and Reappointments - This item will be on the April 9th
Council/Manager Workshop Agenda.
F. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Councilmember Koppen moved and Councilmember Collins
seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:50 p.m.
AGENDA NO. G -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director AQZ�
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: March 30, 2001
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed th
Y g e
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
pp p
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$4,594.03
Checks #53583 thru #53585 dated 3/20 thru 3/21/01
$56,223.78
Checks #53586 thru #53639 dated 3/27/01
$72
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 3/20 thru 3/26/01
$445.50
Check #53640 dated 3/28/01
$389,908.11
Checks #53641 thru #53720 dated 3/30 thru 4/3/01
$79,696.21
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 3/27 thru 3/30/01
$603,375.51 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$333,793.82 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 3/30/0
p 1
$22,676.04 Payroll Deduction check #83419 thru #83423 dated 3/30/01
$356,469.86 Total Payroll
$959.,845.37 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have an questions
Y Yq s
on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supportin g documentation on file if
necessary.
hu
Attachments
SAAGENDAWCL0130.MAR
vchlist
Check Register Page:
1
• 03/23/2001 10:2345AM City of Maplewood
Check
Date
Vendor
4,103.90
53583
3/20/01
00415
DON'S PAINT & BODY SHOP
53584
3/20/01
02003
LOFGREN, TANYA
53585
3/21/01
01361
RENEE'S CAFE AND DELI
53586
3/27/01
01908
ADMINISTRATION, DEPT OF
53587
3/27/01
01996
ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMS
53588
3/27/01
00021
AWD COOLERS OF MN
53589
3/27/01
00171
BEHAN, JAMES
53590
3/27/01
00176
BENEDICTINE CENTER
53591
3/27/01
00196
BLUEBIRD RECOVERY PROGRAM
53592
3/27/01
00240
C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES
53593
3/27/01
00283
CENTURY COLLEGE
53594
3/27/01
02004
CHAPPEAU, GREG
53595
3/27/01
00305
COLEMAN, MELINDA
53596
3/27/01
00307
COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONST. CO.
53597
3/27/01
01997
CORECOMM
53598
3/27/01
00338
CRABTREE COMPANIES INC.
53599
3/27/01
00414
DON'S DOOR SERVICE CO.
53600
3/27/01
01998
DOODY MECHANICAL SERVICE CO
53601
3/27/01
00447
ECOPRINT GRAPHICS SERVICES
53602
3/27/01
00463
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
53603
3/27/01
02005
FLUID PRODUCTS
53604
3/27/01
00539
FREEDOM VALU CENTER
53605
3/27/01
00585
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL
53606
3/27/01
00588
GRACE, DUANE
53607
3/27/01
00589
GRAF, DAVE
53608
3/27/01
00483
IDEACOM MID - AMERICA
53609
3/27/01
01846
I MC SALT INC
53610
3/27/01
00789
KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE CO
53611
3/27/01
00945
MASYS CORP
53612
3/27/01
00972
MENARDS
53613
3/27/01
02007
METRO INTERPRETER CONNECTION
Description /Account
Amount
REPAIR 1996 FORD CROWN VICTORIA
4,103.90
REPLACE DAMAGED TIRE & WHEEL
413.13
CITY MGR'S LUNCHEON MTG
77.00
39 INTERNET E -MAIL ACCTS
117.00
PRE -EMPL SCREENING
390.00
PRE- EMPLOYMENT SCREENING
130.00
WATER SERVICE - FEB 2000
319.02
REIMBURSE MILEAGE 2/7 TO 3/16
25.71
4/3 MTG RM -'8 PERSONS ATTENDING
100.00
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION
8.00
FEES FOR SERVICE
50.00
LAW ENFORCEMENT TRNG
325.00
BOOTS /PADLOCK
47.86
REIMBURSE MEALS/TAXI /HOTEL DEP
379.21
REPAIR STAT 6 FLOAT SYSTEM
559.07
INTERNET ACC - EM & PW /MAINT
180.40
FUSER UNIT & LABOR
335.00
DOOR REPAIR
155.60
HOT WATER REPAIR
864.59
BUSINESS CARDS
452.60
REPAIR TO M2
393.66
RELAY SWITCHES STAT 6
274.00
CAR WASHES
189.00
FEB 2001 SERVICE
11.20
PLAN REVIEWS
3,667.50
PLAN REVIEWS
2,337.49
PLAN REVIEWS
7,427.60
KARATE - MARCH
195.00
REPLACEMENT PHONES
275.82
REPLACED CRT & KEYBOARD
359.60
DEICING SALT
2,784.05
#2 DIESEL, LOW SULPHUR, RED DYED
5,614.10
UNL MID -GRADE (89 OCTANE) GAS
7 838.95
APR 2001 HARDWARE /SOFTWARE SUPP
704.25
MISC SUPPLIES
47.90
MAINT SUPPLIES
7.90
RETURN SUPPLIES
-12.77
SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER
25.00
vcFvlist Check Register Page: 2
03/23/2001 10:2345AM City of Maplewood
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amo unt
53614
3/27/01
01044
MN FIRE SERVICE CERT BD
5 - FF RECERTIFICATION APPL
50.00
53615
3/27/01
01057
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES
225.00
53616
3/27/01
01058
MN SHREDDING LLC
DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION
129.87
53617
3/27/01
01382
MUELLER, RON
PAINT BANQUET ROOM
895.00
53618
3/27/01
01127
N.E.S.A.
PYMT FOR BBALL REF & SCORERS
1,301.50
53619
3/27/01
00395
NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPT OF
DNR FEES
663.00
53620
3/27/01
01999
NORTH MEMORIAL EMS EDUC
PARAMEDIC TRNG - PARSONS
115.00
53621
3/27/01
02000
NORTH METRO AUTO
REPAIR TO DC 3
83.40
53622
3/27/01
01175
NORTH ST. PAUL, CITY OF
MONTHLY UTIL 2/7 TO 3/8
1,369.59
SWR & SEC LIGHT 2/15 - 3/15
620.21
53623
3/27/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF ROBIN SCHARRER - WILD & WACKY
40.00
53624
3/27/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF TAMARA MOTZ - DAYCAMPS CANC
1,350.00
53625
3/27/01
01229
OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, INC.
WIRE MIA MIG - 11 LBS
21.90
53626
3/27/01
02001
ROSEVILLE, CITY OF
INTERVIEW COURSE - BAKKE & DOBLAR
120.00
53627
3/27/01
01407
S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.
OFFICE FURN FOR FIRE MARSHALL -
68.16
53628
3/27/01
01409
S.E.H.
PROJ 00 -01 PROF SRVS - FEB 2001
2, 991.63
53629
3/27/01
01443
SEMPLE EXCAVATING & TRUCKING
FINAL PYMT - BRUENTRUP FARM
5,000.00
53630
3/27/01
01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
CRIME LAB SRVS - FEB 2001
200.00
53631
3/27/01
01516
STAPLES, PAULINE
SUPPLIES
8.58
53632
3/27/01
01545
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
1ST HALF - 2001. MEMBERSHIP
1,600.00
53633
3/27/01
01572
SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.
TAPES
194.77
53634
3/27/01
01586
TARGET STORES -GSA ACCTS REC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
12.92
53635
3/27/01
01653
TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO
HARDBLADE 9' LEO PLOW
115.02
53636
3/27/01
01669
TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT &
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
63.90
53637
3/27/01
02002
TWIN CITY VENDING INC
REPAIR POP MACHINE
65.00
53638
3/27/01
01683
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
PANTS
42.35
BULLETPROOF VEST
634.95
GLOVES /MACE HOLDER
35.60
TURTLENECKS
41.90
BULLETPROOF VEST
634.95
DANNER BOOTS
69.36
BULLETPROOF VEST
634.95
RANK INSIGNIA
18.96
53639
3/27/01
01734
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
87.00
PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
140.00
57
Checks in this report
Total checks :
60 817.81
vchlist Check Register
Page. .
3
03/23/2001 10:2345AM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
Description /Account Amount
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
ount
Transmitted Settlement
Date
Date
Pa ee
Description
03/19/01
03/20/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
03/19/01
03/20/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
03/16/01
03/20/01
MN State Treasurer
State Payroll Tax
03/16/01
03/20/01
CBSA
Dental claims
03/20/01
03/21/01
MN State Treasurer
i
Drivers License #697
03/20/01
03/21/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
03/16/01
03/21101
Elan Financial Services
Purchasing card items
03/21/01
03/22/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers . License #697
03/21/01
03/22/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
03/15/01
03/22/01
MN Dept of Revenue p
Fuel Tax
03/22/01
03/23/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
03/22/01
03/23/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
03/23/01
03/26/01
MN State Treasurer e
Drivers License #697
03/23/01
03/26/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
TOTAL
Amount
956.50
10,134:53
12,648.61
515.76
727.00
6,374.06
11,346.64
765.50
51779-38
744.00
719.00
12,937.00
410.75
8,449.15
72 ,507-88
C!
vchlist Check Register
03/30/2001 10:18:54AM Page' �
City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
53640
3/28/01
01860
WORDEN, KRISTEN
53641
4/3/01
00051
ADVANCED GRAPHICS
53642
4/3/01
01809
AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES
53643
4/3/01
01990
AIRBORNE EXPRESS
53644
4/3/01
02009
ANDERSON'S MAPLE SYRUP INC
53645
4/3/01
00111
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
53646
4/3/01
00121
ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES
53647
4/3/01
00174
BELDE, STAN
53648
4/3/01
01811
BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC
53649
4/3/01
00198
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
53650
4/3/01
01865
BOWMAN, DON
53651
.4/3/01
00211
BRAUN INTERTEC CORP.
53652
4/3/01
00323
CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP.
53653
4/3/01
01871
COOPER, KEN
53654
4/3/01
00276
CORPORATE BENEFIT SERVICES
53655
4/3/01
00446
DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO.
53656
4/3/01
00449
EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
53657
.4/3/01
01866
EMME, MARK
53658
4/3/01
01401
FIRST STUDENT BUS COMPANY
53659
4/3/01
00513
FIRSTAR TRUST SERVICES
53660
4/3/01
00529
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO.
53661
4/3/01
00533
FRANK, PETE
53662
4/3/01
00555
GAYNOR, VIRGINIA
53663
4/3/01
00543
GE CAPITAL
53664
4/3/01
00581
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
53665
4/3/01
00587
GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE
53666
4/3/01
01911
GRIFFIN, COLM
53667
4/3/01
00612
GYM WORKS INC
53668
4/3/01
01867
HANSON, PERRY
53669
4/3/01
00644
HEALTHPARTNERS
53670
4/3/01
00668
HIEBERT, STEVEN
53671
4/3/01
01874
KULAS, RON
53672
4/3/01
00827
L. M. C. I .T.
53673
4/3/01
00828
L.M.C.I.T.
53674
4/3/01
00836
LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER
53675
4/3/01
00888
M/A ASSOCIATES
53676
4/3/01
00932
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
53677
4/3/01
01819
MCLEOD USA
53678
4/3/01
00966
MEDICA CHOICE
53679
4/3/01
01946
MEDICA FINANCE DEPT
53680
4/3/01
00972
MENARDS
53681
4/3/01
01610
METAL DOCTOR, THE
DRAWINGS FOR KIOSK SIGNS
HELMET LETTERS
WINTER SAND - TAX INCLUDED
SHIPMENT TO D GRACE
SPOUTS /BUCKETS
MPWD PATROL & BOARDING FEES
MERCH FOR RESALE
K -9 HANDLER - APRIL 2001
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MONTHLY WATER UTILITIES
VOLLEYBALL MATCHES & ASSIGNMENT
PROF SERVICES - PROJ 00 -04
BACTO DOSE
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
APRIL 2001 ADM FEES
KODAK COPIER USAGE - FEB 2001
UPGRADE SOFTWARE - EQUIPMENT
UPGRADE SOFTWARE - TRAINING
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
YOUTHTRIP BUS FEE 3/21.
2001 PAYING AGENT FEES
2001 PAYING AGENT FEES
2001 PAYING AGENT FEES
2001 PAYING AGENT FEES
2001 PAYING AGENT FEES
2001 PAYING AGENT FEES
APRIL 2001 PREMIUM
SCHEDULING BASKETBALL REFS
PARKING 2/21 & LUNCH CONF 3/2
KODAK COPIER LEASE - FEB 2001
FRONT WHEEL ALIGN - SQD 950
2001 LAND USE - BEYOND BASICS
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
ABDOMINAL FOOTSTRAPS /CYBEX
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
APRIL 2001 PREMIUM
K -9 HANDLER - APRIL 2001
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
4TH INSTALLMENT 4/01 TO 6/01
4TH INSTALLMENT 4/01 TO 6/01
2001 MEMBERSHIP
TRUCK WASH BRUSH
BIRTHDAY CAKES
BIRTHDAY CAKES
LOCAL PHONE SRV 2/16 TO 3/15
APRIL 2001 PREMIUM
REFUND - K RUPRECHT 00020352
MISC SUPPLIES
ALUM RIVET
CONDUITS
ALUM SHEETS /ANGLE /FLAT STEEL
445.50
120.35
2,812.48
86.78
20.25
863.16
117.00
35.00
80.40
80.40
201.00
160.80
1,149.40
504.00
3,634.75
440.77
228.00
507.70
956.70
2,062.50
4,770.66
57.00
255.00
325.00
325.00
325.00
325.00
175.00
175.00
2,524.61
1,000.00
102.37
528.32
41.18
125.00
57.00
29.30
228.00
34,278.24
35.00
285.00
27,414.00
39,891.75
50.00
110.96
128.25
128.25
3,867.75
37,208.68
381.52
70.10
27.58
17.64
421.21
vchtist Check Register Page: g 2
03/30/2001 10:18:54AM City of Maplewood
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
53682
4/3/01
00985
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
WASTEWATER - APRIL 2001
53683
4/3/01
00998
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
53684
4/3/01
01061
MINN STATE FIRE DEPT ASSOC
2000/2001 MEMBERSHIP DUES
53685
4/3/01
01056
MINNESOTA REC. & PARKS ASSOC.
AQUATIC CONFERENCE
53686
4/3/01
01085
MN LIFE INSURANCE
APRIL 2001 PREMIUM
53687
4/3/01
00395
NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPT OF
DNR FEES
53688
3/30/01
01126
NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 612001
PERA LIFE INS - P/R DED IN MAR
53689
4/3/01
01212
OLSON, ARNOLD G
REIMBURSE MILEAGE 2 -26
REIMBURSE MILEAGE - 3/2 TO 3/16
PLAN REV & CODE CONS
53690
4/3/01
01914
OLSON, LIZ
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
53691
4/3/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF LAURANDY- ELEC PRMT 11/27
53692
4/3/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF JOHN PSCHANDL - BAL' MBRSHIP
53693
4/3/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF DYAN SHERWOOD - LIFEGUARD T
53694
4/3/01
.00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF KENNETH REGELMAN - LG TRAINS
53695
4/3/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF BERYL MAHAR - PATIENT INS
53696
4/3/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF ARLIENE MCKAY - PT PAID
53697
4/3/01
01311
P.E. R.A.
ER I D #6120- 00,01,51 - 03/30/01 P/R
53698
4/3/01
01863
PACKER, ROGER
VOLLEYBALL MATCHES OFFICIATED
53699
4/3/01
01250
PECK, DENNIS
SAFETY BOOTS
53700
4/3/01
02013
PEIFFER, MERANCE
SANITARY SEWER BACKUP
53701
4/3/01
01678
QWEST
COIN -OP PHONES
QWEST PHONES & EQUIP
53702
4/3/01
02010
RAMSEY CTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
20% FORFEITED - CSE #00 -008 -406
53703
4/3/01
01360
REINHART FOODSERVICE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
53704
4/3/01
00069
RISK MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES
COMM PYMT TO COLL
.53705
4/3/01
01418
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
MERCH FOR RESALE
VENDING MACHINE SUPPLIES
MERCH FOR RESALE
CANDY & SNACKS
COFFEE FUND
MERCH FOR RESALE
53706
4/3/01
01463
SISTER ROSALIND GEFRE
MASSAGE - FEB 2001
53707
4/3/01
01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
WATER FOR STREET CLEANING
PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES
53708
4/3/01
01526
STATE TREASURER
10% FORFEITED CASE 00- 008 -406
53709
4/3/01
01915
STEFFEN, NANCY
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
53710
4/3/01
01538
STREICHER'S
SQUAD CHANGE -OVER
53711
4/3/01
01578
T.R.F. SUPPLY CO.
TOWELS /SPRAYER
GLOVES/TOWELS/WET WEAR BIBS
53712
4/3/01
01590
TAYLOR, MARSHA
FITNESS CONSULTANT - 1ST QTR
53713
4/3/01
02011
THOMPSON, SARA
REPLACEMENT OF TIRE
53714
4/3/01
01868
TOSKEY, RON
VOLLEYBALL MATCHES OFFICIATED
53715
4/3/01
01580
TSE, INC.
JANITORIAL SRVS 1/11 TO 2/7/01
53716
3/30/01
01698
UNITED WAY OF THE ST. PAUL
1 ST QUARTER 2001
53717
4/3/01
01734
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
53718
4/3/01
01750
WATSON CO INC, THE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
53719
4/3/01
01872
WEBER, MARK
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
53720
4/3/01
01793
XEROX CORPORATION
IMPRESSIONS - FEB 2001
. Amount
156,051.07
668.25
838.40
275.00
5.00
2,572.03
721.00
225.00
3.90
70.73
550.00
253.00
40.50
55.92
150.00
150.00
352.22
382.53
37,177.68
861.00
165.00
11 8.97
504.68
1,153.90
309.60
487.68
536.11
292.66
201.17
202.03
203.52
143.69
143.69
100.56
312.03
2,792.00
488.24
1,774.52
154.80
456.00
1,989.73
315.76
635.53
1,250.00
95.83
684.00
704.40
851.25
265.18
155.29
234.16
439.27
228.00
269.82
vchlist Check Register Page: g 3
03/30/2001 10:1854AM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
81 Checks in this report
naar-rin#innlAt ,-#%ifry#
Amount
Total checks: 3909253.61
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pa ee
Description
03/26/01
03/27/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
03/26/01
03/27/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
03/23/01
03/27/01
CBSA
Dental claims
03/27/01
03/28/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
03/27/01
03/28/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
g
03/23/01
03/28/01
Elan Financial Services
Purchasin g card items
03/28/01
03/29/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
03/28/01
03/29/01
MN State Treasurer
Deput Y R e g istrar istrar #149
03/29/01
03/30/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
03/29/01
03/30/01
MN State Treasurer
Deput y Registrar istrar #149
TOTAL
Amount
950.50
15,284.75
5,159.92
704.50
19,009.08
10,608.58
775.75
14,035.88
549.00
12, 618.25
79, 696.21
�6111
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
DIRECTDEPOSIT
03/30/01
- - - - --
ALLENSPACH, SHERRY
- - - -- - - - --
339.27
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
ALDRI DGE ,MARK
2 6 5 5. 2 9
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
BOHL ,JOHN C
2612.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
FLOR, TIMOTHY
3200.30
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
FRASER ,JOHN
2478.07
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
TAUBMAN ,DOUGLAS J
2185.25
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
PALMA, STEVEN
2567.86
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
JOHNSON, KEVIN
1931.73
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA A
2200.74
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
GROTTY , KERRY
2568.96
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
HASSENSTAB,DENISE R
83.20
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
HIEBERT,STEVEN
2267.84
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
DUNN,ALICE
2104.74
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
CORNER,AMY L
135.80
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
BELDE,STANLEY
2618.39
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
RENSLOW,RITA
150.08
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
BAKKE,LONN A
2107.69
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
BOWMAN,RICK A
2219.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
KOPPEN,MARVIN
339.27
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
PIKE, GARY K
2199.81
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
HEINZ, STEPHEN J
2280.12
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
HERBERT, MICHAEL J
2670.57
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
S T(aCKTOIQ t DER.RELL T
2123.94
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30041
ROSSMAN,DAVID A
2655.61
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
HALWEG,KEVIN R
2574.67
�l
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/Ol
- - - - --
MARUSKA,ERICA
--------------
42 6.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
OLSON, JULIE S
1833 .29
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
BREHE I M, ROGER W
1836.46
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
LARSON,DANIEL J
2057.65
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
THIENES, PAUL
2433.56
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
ANZALD I, MANDY
285-52
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
POWELL, PHILIP
1749.35
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
SZCZEPANSKI ,THOMAS J
2373.04
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
WENZEL,JAY B
1775.58
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
DOBLAR ,RICHARD N
2308.18
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
LOLL INS ,KENNETH V
339.27
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
CAMPBELL ,CRAIG D
1570.34
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
DOLLERSCHELL,ROBERT J
251.25
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
ERICKSON, KYLE F
713.41
DIRECT DEPOSIT
0-3/30/01
WEAVER, KRI STINE A.
1105.87
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
HAWKINS, LISA A
19.35
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
KOEHNEN,AMY
38.40
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
McGUIRE,MICHAEL A
197.48
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
OSTER,ANDREA J
1555.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
URBANSKI, HOLLY S
1482.34
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
ANDERSON, CAROLE J
1517.20
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
JACKSON, MARY L
1575.94
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
TETZLAFF, JUDY A
1391.94
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/34j01
CASAREZ,GINA
1369.54
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
CARLE , JEANETTE E
1503.82
10
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
-
EMPLOYEE NAME
---------------------
AMOUNT
-
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
- - - - -- - --
JAGOE , CAROL
-------- - - - - --
1464.53
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
OLSON, SANDRA
1316.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
CORCORAN, THERESA M
1247.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
MARTINSON, CAROL F
1438.34
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
EVERSON, PAUL
1824.66
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/
PARSONS ,KURT G
1489.09
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
SPANGLER,EDNA E
734.35
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
ZWIEG, SUSAN C.
1553.37
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
DeBILZAN, THOMAS C
1385.54
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
EDGE ,DOUGLAS
1705.13
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
LUTZ,DAVID P
1718.24
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
MEYER,GERALD W
DIRECT DEPOSIT
1809-93
03/30/01
NAGEL,BRYAN
1735.74
DIRECT DEPOSIT'
03/30/01
OSWALD,ERICK D
1913.54
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
DUCHARME
DIRECT DEPOSIT
,JOHN
1929-54
03/30/01
PECK,DENNIS L
DIRECT DEPOSIT
2067.94
03/30/01
PRIEBE,WILLIAM
DIRECT DEPOSIT
19-65-54
03/30/01
DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M
DIRECT DEPOSIT
1625-25
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
1611.94
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
GREW HAYMAN,JANET M
10 4 2 .21
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
HORSNELL ,JUDITH A
871.97
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
NELSON, JEAN
916.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
GAYNORBVIRGINIA A
1500.74
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
LIVINGSTON,JOYCE L
863.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
THOMPSON, DEBRA J
495.66
11
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR.THE`CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
DIRECTDEPOSIT
03/30/01
- - - - --
EKSTRAND, THOMAS G '
2213.16
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
ROBERTS ,KENNETH
2269.65
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
CARVER ,NICHOLAS N
2091.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
KELLY ,LISA
1186.76
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
NORDQUIST,RICHARD
1638.94
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
OT I S ,MARY ELLEN M
7 4 6. 3 3
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
CHRISTENSEN,JODIE D
920.71
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
COLEMAN, PHILIP
280.03
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
FARR ,DIANE M
345.06
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
HORWATH ,RONALD J
489.63
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
CARSON, DEBRA
358.99
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
SEEGER, GERALD F
416.47
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
STEINHORST,JEFFREY
568.67
DIRECT DEPOSJI'
03/30/01
SWANSON,LYLE
1557.29
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
FLUG, MEGAN L
155.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
WATCZAK,LAURA
2104.74
DIRECT DEPOSTT
03/30/01
HOIUM,DORA
748.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
MORNING, TIMOTHY L
1489.67
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
SCHULTZ,SCOTT M
1435.50
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
REILLY,MICHAEL R
1287.22
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
YOUNG,DILLON J
824.82
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
RAWLINGS,RINDA M
1105.54
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/34/01
FLUG,ELAINE R
87.88
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01.
McC'LUNG, HEATHER A
494.'07
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
DARS T ,JAMES M
1686.13
12
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
- - - - --
SINDT,ANDREA J
- - - - --
1226.34
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
WORWA, LINDSAY M
109.30
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
JUNG, STEPHANIE J
1760.74
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
FRY, PATRICIA
1525.54
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
CARLSON, THERESE
1868.39
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
LE , SHERYL
3361.92
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
FAUST, DANIEL F
3505.30
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
BAUMAN, GAYLE L
2374.77
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
KELSEY, CONNIE L
992.86
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
GUILFOILE, KAREN E
2203.38
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
WINGER, DONALD S
3506.12
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
ANDREWS,SCOTT A
2663.77
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
BANICK,JOHN J
2743.10
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
KARIS,FLINT D
2487.53
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
KVAM,DAVID
2504.01
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
RABBETT,KEVIN
2381.78
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
STEFFEN,SCOTT L
2606.80
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
THOMALLA,DAVID J
2743.10
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
BERGERON, JOSEPH A
3052.34
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
GERVAI S — JR , CLARENCE N
2040.22
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
CALLAHAN, COLLEEN J
2113.68
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
LUKIN, STEVEN J
2657.40
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
SVENDSEN,RUSTIN L
2121.80
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
FRIEFER,WILLIANd
1991.94
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
KANE ,MICHAEL R
2235.14
13
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
-----------------------
AMOUNT
DIRECT UEYOSz
03/30/01
- - - - --
LUNDSTEN,LANCE
- --
..2544.51
DIRECTDEPOS`1T
03/30/01
CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER M
2634.33
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
ANDERSON, BRUCE
3150.98
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
MARUSKA, MARK A
2235-14
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
HUT CHINSON, ANN E
1853.54
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/,30/01
COLEMAN, MELINDA
3315.34
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
GRAF,MICHAEL
1311.94
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
ROBB INS , AUDRA L
1311.94
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
CROSSON, LINDA
1743.14
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
EASTMAN ,THOMAS E
2195.14
DIRECT P•EPOSIT
03/30/01
STAPLES , PAULINE
2472.00
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
SCHLINGMAN,PAUL
1882.34
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
HURLEY, STEPHEN
2314.62
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
JOHNSON, BONNIE
872.36
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
BERGO,CHAD M
1673.54
DIRECT DEPOSIT
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
MARTIN, JERROLD
13 3 7. 6 0
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
HALWEG , JOD I A
1344.69
DIRECT DEPOSIT
03/30/01
AHL , R. CHARLES
3288.46
83247
03/30/01
CARDINAL, ROBERT J.
385.50
83248
03/30/01
WASILUK,JULIE A
339.27
83249
03/30/01
FURSMAN,RICHARD F
3988.99
83250
03/30/01
ZICK,LINDA
241.50
83251
03/30/01
INGVOLDSTAD,CUR'I°IS J
87.50
83252
03/30/01
CUDE,LARRY J
403.46
83253
03/30/01
MATHEYS,ALANA KAYE
1679.31
14
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
CHECK DATE
----
EMPLOYEE NAME
83254
- - - - --
03/30/01
------------------------ - - - - --
WEGWERTH,JUDITH A
83255
03/30/01
VIETOR,LORRAINE S
83256
03/30/01
MICHNA,PATRICIA M
83257
03/30/01
PALANK, MARY KAY
83258
03/30/01
RICHIE,CAROLE L
83259
03/30/01
RYAN,MICHAEL
83260
03/30/01
SVENDSEN,JOANNE M
83261
03/30/01
TICHY,PAMELA M
83262
03/30/01
BARTZ,PAUL
83263
03/30/01
BUSACK,DANIEL P
83264
03/30/01
KONG,TOMMY T
83265
03/30/01
LU,JOHNNIE T
83266
03/30/01
SCHROFER,ROBERT J
83267
03/30/01
WELCHLIN,CABOT V
83268
03/30/01
MEEHAN,JAMES
83269
03/30/01
SHORTREED,MICHAEL P
83270
03/30/01
DARST,ROBERTA L
83271
03/30/01
SCHWAB,TAHIRAH H
83272
03/30/01
CHLEBECK,JUDY M
83273 >
03/30/01
NIVEN,AMY S
83274
03/30/01
ELIAS,BENJAMIN G
83275
03/30/01
FREBERG,RONALD L
83276
03/30/01
JONES,DONALD R
83277
03/30/01
ELIAS,JAMES G
83278
03/30/01
LINDBLOM,RANDAL
AMOUNT
1491.14
1491.43
213.00
1454.34
1438.34
3022.43
1669.86
177.00
2083.34
1570.34
1445.85
1337.60
1528.41
2114.41
2412.53
2801.07
589.75
56.00
1611.94
623.17
460.00
1758.05
1481.64
2067.94
1929.54
15
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
83279
03/30/01
- - - - --
EDSON,DAVID B
--------------
1684.07
83280
03/30/01
HELEY,ROLAND B
1639.14
83281
03/30/01
HINNENKAMP,GARY
1596.02
83282
03/30/01
LINDORFF,DENNIS P
1609.54
83283
03/30/01
NOVAK,MICHAEL J
1236.74
83284..
93/30/01
HANSEN,LORI L
891.08
83285
03/30/01
ANDERSON,EVERETT
312.64
83286
03/30/01
OSTROM,MARJORIE
2569.54
83287
03/30/01
WENGER,ROBERT J
2053.54
83288
03/30/01
ANGLES,JERI L
128.00
83289
03/30/01
BENNETT,HEIDI
120.00
83290
03/30/01
BJORK, BRANDON R
221.25
83291
03/30/01
BUCZKOWSKI,ALAN
75.25
83292
03/30/01
DRAGOS,AMANDA M
20.25
83293
03/30/01
DRESSEN,EMILY L
21.00
83294
03/30/01
FINN,GREGORY S
1403.14
83295
03/30/01
FRANK,LAURA
342.38
83296
03/30/01
GEBHARD,JILLIAN R
333.25
83297
03/30/01
GLASS,DANIEL M
40.00
83298`
03/3 0/01
GORE,MICHAEL A
50.00
83299
03/30/01
HAWKES,BRYAN L
43.00
83300
03/30/01
HOLDER,RYAN M
55.00
83301
03/30/01
HORNER,JAY B
88.00
83302
03/30/01
JONDAHL,ERIN E
28.00
83303
03/30/01
KLEM,JOSH H
90.00
16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
83304
03/30/01
- - - - --
McBRIDE,PATRICK D
--------------
91.00
83305
03/30/01
NIEMCZYK,ANTHONY R
48.00
83306
03/30/01
NIEMCZYK,BRIAN N
56.25
83307
03/30/01
O'SHEA,COLETTE T
35.00
83308
03/30/01
RAJAN,RAJIU E
73.50
83309
03./30/01
ROERING, JORDAN T
69.00
83310
03/30/01
SHOBERG,KARI A
261.00
83311
03/30/01
SIKORA,LEAH K
53.00
83312
03/30/01
SIKORA,PAUL T
116.00
83313
03/30/01
SPENCER,WILLIAM
171.25
83314
03/30/01
TARR- JR,GUS L
120.00
83315
03/30/01
THOMAS,RUSSELL
63.00
83316
03/30/01
TVEDTEN,ERIK A
139.40
83317
03/30/01
VANDERBOSCH,BLAKE R
55.00
83318
03/30/01
VAUGHAN,PATRICK J
212.00
83319
03/30/01
WALSH,JESSICA M
26.00
83320
03/30/01
WERNER,KATIE M
278.00
83321
03/30/01
GERMAIN,DAVID
1646.62
83322
03/30/01
HAAG,MARK W
1279.94
83323
03/30/01
NADEAU,EDWARD A
2235.14
83324
03/30/01
FUDGE,SUSAN L
136.00
83325
03/30/01
GLASS,JEAN
937.01
83326
03/30/01
HOItTM,SHEILA
896.86
83327
03/30/01
HOOGE,NICK S
115.60
83328
03/30/01
MOFFAT,ETHAN J
156.20
17
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
CHECK DATE
---- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
83329
03/30/01
------------------------ - - - - --
PARTLOW,JOSHUA J
-------- - - - - --
307.70
83330
03/30/01
POWERS,NICOLE L
471.21
83331
03/30/01
RIDLEHOOVER,KA.TE I
208.87
83332
03/30/01
SCHMIDT,RUSSELL
1289.54
83333
03/30/01
SEVERSON,CHRISTINA M
142.00
833.314
03/30/01
SHOBERG,CARY J
398.16
83335
03/30/01
SMITH,AMY L
33.49
83336
03/30/01
ANDERSON,TIMOTHY R
156.40
83337
03/30/01
BACHMAN,NICOLE T
75.35
83338
03/30/01
BITTNER,KATIE C
30.00
83339
03/30/01
BODZIAK,MICHA.EL D
250.00
83340
03/30/01
CARLSON,JULIE ANN.
20.00
83341
03/30/01
CHAPMAN,JENNY A
342.14
83342
03/30/01
CMIEL,NICHOLAS S
57.75
83343
03/30/01
COSTA,JOSEPH P
171.00
83344
03/30/01
DAMROW,KELLY C
20.40
83345
03/30/01
DEMPSEY,BETH M
40.70
83346
03/30/01
DeGRAW,KRYSTAL M
535.18
83347
03/30/01
ERICKSON,CAROL A
84.60
83348
03/30/01
FALKENSTEIN,MONICA A
19.50
83349
03/30/01
FONTAINE,ANTHONY
9.00
83350
03/30/01
GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C
297.75
83351
03/30/01
HAGGERTY,KATHRYN A
113.40
83352
03/30/01
HAWKE,ASHLEY RYAN.
718.38
83353
03/30/01
HEINN,REBECCA L
282.90
a
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
CHECK DATE
---- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
83354
03/30/01
- - - - --
HENLY,SAMUEL E
-------- - - - - --
45.50
83355
03/30/01
HOLMGREN,LEAH M
379.30
83356
03/30/01
HOULE,DENISE L
367.65
83357
03/30/01
HUPPERT,ERIN M
222.00
83358
03/30/01
IRISH, KARL D
118.63
8.3359
03/30/01
JOHNSON,ROBERT P
262.55
83360
03/30/01
JOHNSON,ROLLAND H
159.50
83361
03/30/01
JOHNSON,SUSAN M
36.00
83362
03/30/01
JOVONOVICH,TODD R
85.20
83363
03/30/01
KERSCHNER,BRANDON R
22.75
83364
03/30/01
KERSCHNER,JOLENE M
176.25
83365
03/30/01
KOEHNEN,MARY B
549.24
83366
03/30/01
KROLL,MARK J
54 .40
83367
03/30/01
KRONHOLM,KATHRYN R
274.63
83368
03/30/01
MILLS,.ANNE K
45.50
83369
03/30/01
McMAHON,MELISSA E
94.25
83370
03/30/01
OLSON,ABIGAIL E
48.83
83371
03/30/01
OWEN,JONATHAN
116.98
83372
03/30/01
PEHOSKI,CAITLIN M
144.63
83373
03/30/01
PEHOSKI,JOEL T
95.20
83374
03/30/01
POWERS,JESSICA
125.45
83375
03/30/01
REGESTER, DOUG
42.50
83376
03/30/01
SMITLEY,SHARON L
282.60
83377
03/30/01
SWANER,JESSICA
159.90
83378
03/30/01
WARNER, CAROLYN
139.30
19
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
------ - - - - --
CHECK DATE
---- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
83379
03/30/01
- - - - --
WELTER,ELIZABETH M
-------- - - - - --
199.96
83380
03/30/01
WELTER,KRISTINE M
91.00
83381
03/30/01
WHITE,NICOLE B
266.50
83382
03/30/01
WHITE,TIMOTHY M
62.10
83383
03/30/01
WILLIAMS,KELLY M
854.58
83384...
03130/01
WOODMAN, ALICE E
161.10
83385
03/30/01
ZIELINSKI,JENNIFER L
90.50
83386
03/30/01
BOSLEY,CAROL
215.25
83387
03/30/01
GLASS,GILLIAN
12.90
83388
03/30/01
GROPPOLI,LINDA M
211.75
83389
03/30/01
HANSEN,ANNA K
159.13
83390
03/30/01
HANSEN,EMILY J
25.50
83391
03/30/01
HUPPERT,ERICA L
122.85
83392
03/30/01
KONECZNY,JENNA M
45.00
83393
03/30/01
LARKIN, JENNIFER L
48.75
83394
03/30/01
SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN
352.00
83395
03/30/01
SHERRILL,CAITLIN A
34.25
83396
03/30/01
ANDERSON,LINDSEY J
15.00
83397
03/30/01
BEHAN,JAMES
1450.58
83398
03/30/01
CHAPEAU,GREG M
650.19
83399
03/30/01
DOUGLASS,TOM
119.70
83400
03/30/01
JAHN,DAVID J
1469.14
83401
03/30/01
KOSKI,JOHN F
1005.54
83402
03/30/01
KYRK,ASHLEY
75.60
83403
03/30/01
LANGEVIN,KRISTINA A
78.00
20
21
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
- --
CHECK DATE
---- - - - - --
EMPLOYEE NAME
------------------------
AMOUNT
83404
03/30/01
- - - - --
LESLIE,DUSTIN G
-------- - - - - --
252.00
83405
03/30/01
LONETTI,JAMES F
786.36
83406
03/30/01
MA.INA,FRANK
186.00
83407
03/30/01
MORIN,TROY J
174.00
83408
03/30/01
PATTERSON,ALBERT
688.75
8340.9
03/30/01
PETERSON,LYNDSAY P
15.00
83410
03/30/01
PRINS,KELLY M
414.97
83411
03/30/01
RI STOW ,JONATHAN W
270.00
83412
03/30/01
ROSEBEAR,CRYSTAL J
105.00
83413
03/30/01
SARPONG,SEAN D
79.50
83414
03/30/01
SEVERSON,HOLLY A
150.00
83415
03/30/01
SEVERSON,JACOB D
18.00
83416
03/30/01
AICHELE,CRAIG J
1431.94
83417
03/30/01
MULVANEY,DENNIS M
1779.94
83418
03/30/01
PRIEM, STEVEN A.
1657.86
333793.82
21
AGENDA NO. G
TO: City Manager
AGENDA REPORT
FROM: Finance Director LQ940,
RE: Budget Changes for Wage Increases
DATE: March 28, 2001
Action by Council
Date �..�...� --
Endorsed -- - —
Modified -
Rejected
On February 12 the City Council approved wage increases for four bargaining
units that total $250,860. The breakdown by fund is as follows:
$199,990 — General Fund
480 — Recycling Fund
9,990 — Recreation Programs Fund
9,600 — Sanitary Sewer Fund
22,790 — Community Center Fund
4 — Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Fund
3,310 —Data Processing Fund
It is recommended that the City Council approve the appropriate budget changes
to finance these wage increases.
CAagn
AGENDA ITEM N
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
DATE:
City Manager
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit Review
1955 Clarence Street
Maplewood Fire Station Number 2
March 30, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The conditional use permit (CUP) for the property at 1955 Clarence Street is due for review. The
CUP is for the new Maplewood' Fire Station Number 2 at this location. (See the maps on pages 3
through 5 and the city council minutes starting on page 6.)
BACKGROUND
On March 13, 2000, the council approved the following for this site:
1. A comprehensive land use plan amendment from R31-1 (residential high density) to G
(government facility). The code requires that, to approve a conditional use permit (CUP),
the land use plan designation for a property must be in conformance with the proposed use.
2. A parking lot setback variance for the proposed 10 parking spaces that would front on
Clarence Street. The code requires a 15 -foot setback and these will be perpendicular
spaces accessed directly from Clarence Street.
3. A parking lot curbing variance for sections of the parking lot and entrance drive that are not
proposed for curbing. The code requires continuous concrete curbing for parking lots with
more than 12 spaces. The applicant was not proposing curbing in these areas for more
effective drainage.
4. A CUP for a public building. The city code requires a CUP for "public utility, public service
or public building uses."
5. The building, site and landscape plans.
DISCUSSION
The contractor is working on the facility and expects to have it done in June 2001. The city
council should review this CUP again in one year to ensure that all the council conditions are
being met. City staff has not received any complaints about this facility and is not aware of any
problems.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit for Maplewood Fire Station Number 2 at 1955 Clarence Street
again in one year.
Kr /p: sec 1 5/fi resta. rev
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. March 13, 2000 City Council Minutes
0)
Attachment 1
PALM C1R• o: z t Q 2 �i
CT. �� S EDGEHIL.L RD.
Cd
CONNOR CO A OR oa
�'� AVE. v � v � � DEMONT � AVE.
T. DEMOS AVE. p W
Hit BROOK AVE. BROOKS �d
w AVE. ° EL ElyTH
1016. BROOKS g o SEX TANT Z Far A
CT. 4 AVE. � s osoas �v
® EX AVE. etc !
� o
'` f G ERVAIS AVE. >. GERVAIS �`' °� �•. GE AlS
GRANDVIEW AVE. CT.
00 PKWY w
0
VIKING OR.
1l
SHERREN AVE. AVE.
Knu2LI ad Lake C .j - :`""' �? COPE - AVE. COPE AVE. P¢� a
LARK CT. v LARK Q AVE. C
`! AVE, a LAURIE
�
Keller �) :, ° � iii Z
t�
\i Lake' ? ° CO. RD. N v LAURIE RD. r SMr,rooe° LAURIE ° RD W �?
/ . �[ JJ
v ti .J W ' AOIk ?• W = W
t LELAND RD. c� o
SAND URST AVE.
JUNCTION AVE. 4J Z B w CO. RD. > 8
Y
BURKE Cr. j ��r! C O Tinter J e ®� t=
P°t* AVE, m BURKE AVE. o° ® BURKE AVE. C.nCO"`� v .
p ; ! ~Z,� (1) CHAMBERS ST o (
t.��
AV j ° ELDR IDGE AVE. 3 •O" 06 m
1 F' �? LN. W
RSE �n AVE. BEL.MONT AVE.
I 1 COV 3 It" ew CRY Na
G� SKILL AV
E. MAN AVE. HARRIS AVE. W
000 K = SHO ROSEWOOD AVE. N.
5
osEw D
o� v port AN AV. AVE. S. RAMSEY COUN'7Y
^VE W Q� P �J NURSING D
Tra �l c� aR GROU
FROST AVE. GOODRICH �.
AI.DRICH • GOLF �
W
CC El NTON AVE. ? El � >- o: ® �' COURSE P J�
�' w < z w U f ° v SU AVE. R ARENA �. Q
GO '-' ° FRIS6IE AVE. Q < �a• �
Sy p a RIP LEY v z '� p RIPL.EY AVE.
4 J G Wakeftel&
S PH Cr. Lake m v KINGSTON AV
v
.� ,� . a J
Round ! i , 1 O,Q Y v = S HW AVE j� }� �? —�,,+ w �' PRICE AVE.
�Lake' f; i Lake = v_� Z g Y _
` �'•` 5 � W PRICE PSI
...i� Phalen c z tt or
W V1
�l
LOCATION MAP
3
4
N
Attachment
_ r
..
as 4 %01
k Y4 M
q 30 O E o n 15%.4 �+ 6O t �t c -- ►' P 3030 0
J -
1 � Z eryr �
A Q: � 1352 �� . � � 2 2 , 2 17 , g
o • V im �I 6F _ A
; 5 25 20 _ 3 _ --
� o _
4 �o ( 61) 2 .; 0 2023 • 4 .
'r 0 — — PARK EDGE ■
3 , .,$*. 2017 j = —APARTMENTS — •
5 _ _ 5 '
i
is 9
CD i 13
s F ; , a. 2007 ,, V I Ce
7 Z, 010 -
IQ Z 2 —�
1 2003 = . s ' I Z4 1 0)
�.; 9 tia . _ ..� , .3 C _. - 4.90 , o '
1 10 s : � I .,•;,,. a 2000.2002 4— — 9
•lam) i i o 1T •.•, :: ; 1995 g V . c� it lot
je
= C�
Li w. ` 1991 1 r
fin r '
v 13 '� J O o .�
2
; l j
A : :� 7 —
A :r ?:::::: 130!tt-
g 8 .!!►:' ''��.. ::::......:....:.
0 G
A YAN
0
::ti r r: ? . :,.:: • as - J
30 t
:;:; ". '' : ; : a.; ??:' :; c • :: • . f ? .: • •.,. • � _ I
In ?. .. ......
V ►. n
of Zoo >. ::.....; :... z 5 Lij :
Rl
.::: 3
Z 3 4.6 ... . ...
1
...........
XXXXV-0
24 . ��::. •� y :� 197
(51 z ........... 1.
4
Lon
. ........ LI
zz F
. ..........
19E
Z i �
j 6 (55),x' ....Y I r' ; •" I
o
_:.::: f. = SC H o L 1 .
27.2 s , �1
.. .......
o :ti : !" :. ?::: .� 1 -1940 _ ' 1 _ 2 Ct
• o � a _ CO ��:.:::;• 938 o c
s
R&M FAMILY
ME AND W :`:' ' -
M E _ ,til.. . 15 OAK STREET '
MAPLEWOOD 1 :tip �, 14- FU RNITU RE
z , ,
•.: '.: •ti:: 5 ' 3 2 1
BAKERY ..� Z _ •. Z l 1 0) ,� 1s I�+ zs �.s• -s �s 30 3110 y t7 8•'7 GO. � ad
F R. S T
30 759 40 ' " 40 6
IA
I d1 to 1 4 3� IC, tr,
RICHARD'S _ r
= _3 _ 28
T MARKET -
_ - s MIKE'S LP TER A. 27
WEBS TER
DENTAL = s •
I a 2 Z =■_ 25 6
s ts
� -� _ 1 3
S 3 i ►_ = 5 20 ti = t 23 =$ �.._._ . 23 l e
PROPERTY LINE I ZONING MAP
4
t
Attachment 3
SITE PLAN
4
N
CLASS 5 WETLAND
SWAY
X--
O
r
JAL
' .
Aq
Ir v
k
1!r
1
1
W
ww rrwsle n• r•vr
•
reef
1 •
PROPOSED
P°°'°"+
1
FIRE STATION
serve n.o..
�-
.
U)
'
W 1
1.. '
V
Z
W
J
♦
V
LANDSCAPE PLAN
0
SITE PLAN
4
N
Attachment 4
Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minn. Stat.
§349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this resolution by the City Council of Maplewood,
Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 7:00 Maplewood Fire Station (Clarence Street)
A. Land Use Plan Amendment (R3 (H) to G) - 4 Votes
B. Parking Lot Setback Variance (Clarence Street)
C. Parking Lot Curbing Variance
D. Conditional Use Permit
E. Design Approval
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
c. Associate Planner Tom Ekstrand presented the specifics of the report.
d. Boardmember Ananath Shankar presented the Community Design Review Board report.
e. Chair Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report.
f. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one
appeared.
g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
A. Land Use Plan Amendment (R3 (H) to G) - 4 Votes
Councilmember Koppers introduced the following Resolution, approving a comprehensive land use plan
amendment from R3H (residential hig ensity ) to government fa cility) the Maplewood Fire Station.
RESOLUTION 00 -03 -032
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Maplewood Fire Department applied for a change to the city's land use plan from R3H
(high density residential) to G (government facility) to bring the land use plan into conformance with their
proposed use as a fire station.
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property north and northwest of 1347 and 1351 Frost Avenue. The
legal description is:
5
6
That part of a 100.00 foot wide railroad right of way lying east of the east right of way line of Ramsey
County LRT right of way (formerly the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way), lying south of the south
right, of way line of the State of Minnesota D.N.R. right of way (formerly the St. Paul. and St. Croix Falls
R.R. right of way) and lying north of the north right of way line of Frost Avenue;
the centerline of said 100.00 foot right -of -way is described as follows:
Commencing at the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Township 29, Range 22;
thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 54 seconds East along the south line of said northwest quarter a
distance of 377.35 feet to the beginning of the centerline to be described; thence northeasterly a distance of
1,064.80 feet along a nontangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 1,146.27 feet, a
central angle of 53 degrees 13 minutes 24 seconds and a chord bearing of North 42 degrees 34 minutes 25
seconds East; thence North 69 degrees 11 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of 300.00 feet and said
centerline there terminating.
That part of Block 8, GLADSTONE, lying northeasterly of a line run from the northwest corner of said
Block 8 to a point on the southeasterly line of said Block 8 distant 352.20 feet southwesterly from the most
easterly corner thereof.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On February 23, 2000, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a
hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The
planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the land use plan change.
v
2 Il
O March 13, 2000, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports
and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described change
because the proposed fire station would comply with the general development policies in the Maplewood
Comprehensive Plan.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on March 13, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
B. Parking Lot Setback Variance (Clarence Street)
Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution, approving a parking lot setback variance for the
proposed 10 parking spaces that would front on Clarence Street. The co a requires a 15-foot setback. ese
would be perpendicular spaces accessed directly from Clare Street.
RESOLUTION 00 -03 -033
PARKING LOT SETBACK VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Maplewood Fire Department applied for a parking lot setback variance from the zoning
0
code.
`1MEREAS, this variance applies to property north and northwest of 1347 and 1351 Frost Avenue. The
legal description is:
That part of a 100.00 foot wide railroad right of way lying east of the east right of way line of Ramsey
County LRT right of way (formerly the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way), lying south of the south
right of way line of the State of Minnesota D.N.R. right of way (formerly the St. Paul and St. Croix Falls
R.R. right of way) and lying north of the north right of way line of Frost Avenue;
the centerline of said 100.00 foot right -of -way is described as follows:
Commencing at the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Township 29, Range 22;
thence. South. 89. degrees .48 minutes 54 seconds East along the south line of said northwest quarter a
distance of 377.35 feet to the beginning of the centerline to be described; thence northeasterly a distance of
1,064.80 feet along a nontangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 1,146.27 feet, a
central angle of 53 degrees 13 ' minutes 24 seconds and a chord bearing of North 42 degrees 34 minutes 25
seconds East; thence North 69 degrees 11 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of 300.00 feet and said
centerline there terminating.
That part of Block 8, GLADSTONE, lying northeasterly of a line run from the northwest corner of said
Block 8 to a point on the southeasterly line of said Block 8 distant 352.20 feet southwesterly from the most
easterly corner thereof.
WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c)(5)(a) of the zoning code requires a 15 -foot parking lot setback from street
` right-of-way.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to build a parking lot in the Clarence Street right -of -way.
WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 15 feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On February 23, 2000 the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
variance.
2. The city council held a public hearing on March 13, 2000. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described variance as
recommended by the city staff that would allow a parking lot to be built within the Clarence Street right -of -way
for the following reasons:
1. Compliance with the setback requirements would cause the applicant undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the property. The site is oddly shaped making meeting all arkin lot
p g
setback requirements difficult.
8
7
2. The applicant would meet the spirit and intent of the code by providing handicap- accessible parking
spaces closer to the front entrance than if the spaces were moved to a different location.
3. The city has allowed parking in the right -of -way before when the situation warranted it.
This variance is subject to the applicant submitting a curbing plan which indicates continuous concrete
curbing, concrete edging and parking barriers as shown on the curbing diagram in the staff report. This
plan must be submitted to staff for approval before the issuance of a building permit.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on March 13, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
C. Parking Lot Curbing Variance
Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution, approving a parking lot curbing variance for
sections of the parking lot and entrance nve that are not proposed for curbing. The code requires continuous
concrete curbing for parking lots with more than 12 spaces. The applicant is not proposing curbing in these
areas for more e ective drainage.
RESOLUTION 00 -03 -034
PARKING LOT CURB VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Maplewood Fire Department applied for a parking lot curbing variance from the zoning 4A;`
code.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to property north and northwest of 1347 and 1351 Frost Avenue. The
legal description is:
That part of a 100.00 foot wide railroad right of way lying east of the east right of way line of Ramsey
County LRT right of way (formerly the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way), lying south of the south
right of way line of the State of Minnesota D.N.R. right of way (formerly the St. Paul and St. Croix Falls
R.R. right of way) and lying north of the north right of way line of Frost Avenue;
the centerline of said 100.00 foot right -of -way is described as follows:
Commencing at the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Township 29, Range 22;
thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 54 seconds East along the south line of said northwest quarter a
distance of 3 77.3 5 feet to the beginning of the centerline to be described; thence northeasterly a distance of
1,064.80 feet along a nontangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 1,146.27 feet, a
central angle of 53 degrees 13 minutes 24 seconds and a chord bearing of North 42 degrees 34 minutes 25
seconds East; thence North 69 degrees 11 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of 300.00 feet and said
centerline there terminating.
That part of Block 8, GLADSTONE, lying northeasterly of a line run from the northwest confer of said
Block 8 to a point on the southeaster) line of said Block 8 distant 352.20 feet southwester) from the most
y y
easterly corner thereof.
WHEREAS, Section 36 -22 (c) of the zoning code requires that all parking lots have continuous concrete
curbing.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to leave some of their parking lot edges uncurbed.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On February 23, 2000 the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
variance.
2. The city council held a public hearing on March 13, 2000. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to . speak and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described variance as
recommended by the city staff that would waive the curbing requirement in specific areas on the site plan.
Approval is because sheet drainage from the two larger parking lots is preferred for water quality in this
instance.
This variance is subject to the applicant submitting a curbing plan which indicates continuous concrete
curbing, concrete edging and parking barriers as shown on the curbing diagram in the staff report. This
plan must be submitted to staff for approval before the issuance of a building permit.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on March 13, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
D. Conditional Use Permit
Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution, approving a Conditional Use Permit for a public
building for Maplewood Fire Station No.
RESOLUTION 00 -03 -035
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Maplewood Fire Department applied for a conditional use permit for a fire station.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property north and northwest of 1347 and 1351 Frost Avenue. The
legal description is:
That part of a 100.00 foot wide railroad right of way lying east of the east right of way line of Ramsey
County LRT right of way (formerly the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way), lying south of the south
right of way line of the State of Minnesota D.N.R. right of way (formerly the St. Paul and St. Croix Falls
C R.R. right of way) and lying north of the north right of way line of Frost Avenue;
10 9
the centerline of said 100.00 foot right -of -way is described as follows:
Commencing at the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Township 29, Range 22;
thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 54 seconds East along the south line of said northwest quarter a
gr g q
distance of 377.35 feet to the beginning of the centerline to be described; thence northeasterly a distance of
1,064.80 feet along a nontangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 1,146.27 feet, a
central angle of 53 degrees 13 minutes 24 seconds and a chord bearing of North 42 degrees 34 minutes 25
seconds East; thence North 69 degrees 11 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of 300.00 feet and said
centerline there terminating.
That part of Block 8, GLADSTONE, lying northeasterly of a line run from the northwest corner of said
Block 8 to a point on the southeasterly line of said Block 8 distant 352.20 feet southwesterly from the most
easterly corner thereof.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional. use permit is as follows:
1. On February 23, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
permit.
2. On March 13, 2000 the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the paper
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a
chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional
use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with
the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features `-
10
into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant shall have their surveyor provide the legal description for the Clarence Street right -of-
way and have the city attorney prepare documentation for the dedication and recording of this right -
of -way.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on March 13, 2000.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
E. Design Approval
t . Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the design approval (building, site and landscape plans) for
Maplewood Fire Station No. 2.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
I. AWARD OF BIDS
None
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Landmark, Inc. Utility Service Refund
a. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
b. Public Works Director Haider presented the specifics of the report.
12 11
AGENDA nEM N0.kZ---Y'
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
DATE:
City Manager
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit Review
Southwest corner of English Street and Gervais Avenue
Wheeler Lumber Landscape Material Center
March 27, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
MWied
Reje aed
The conditional use permit (CUP) for the property on the southwest corner of English Street and
Gervais Avenue is due for review. The CUP is for Wheeler Lumber to operate an outdoor storage
yard for landscape materials from this location. (See the maps on pages 2 through 4 and the city
council minutes starting on page 5.)
BACKGROUND
On March 27, 2000, the council approved the following for this site:
1. A CUP for outdoor storage. This approval was subject to the four conditions listed on page
six.
2. The design plans, including those for the building, site and screening fence.
On January 8, 2001, the city council approved a CUP revision and the design plans for the
replacement of the existing monopole on the site with a taller monopole and new ground
equipment.
DISCUSSION
The applicant is meeting the conditions of the conditional use permit. City staff has not received
any complaints about this facility and is not aware of any problems with the storage facility.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit for the Wheeler Lumber landscape material center on the
southwest corner of English Street and Gervais Avenue again in one year.
Kr /p : sec9 /wheeler. rev
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. March 27, 2000 City Council Minutes
�J
BEAM AVE.
ui kOy�Ma
r cr
v•
2.
G •� . 3. J o
\� 19
1. SUMMIT CT.
2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR.
3. DULUTH CT.
4. LYDIA ST.
BEAM
Attachment
U
0
Q
z
ST w
O S
3
_
0
AVE.
W
2
Kohlman
Lake
0
0
H
PALM
0
Kohlmon
Pork
COUNTY
0 0
O w
U
U fV
KOHLMAN AVE.
L
'
cn
Q
z
ST w
O S
3
_
0
AVE.
W
2
W
0
0
H
PALM
0
Kohlmon
Pork
°
CT. PALM Cv '
V)
Li
-�
AVE. V)
NOR
CONNOR CON E.
ir
a
5 3
U
V)
Z
z North
Hczelwood
"5 Pork
M
w
CT. DEMON
AVE.
Lake
`
w
�
0 ¢ _
CO. RD.
mmomfta
�
W
w
o BROOKS
�
(n
w
o
CT.
Q
12
SEXTANT AVE.
kF�
F,Q
— P KWY-
WEDGE
z AVE. w
AVE.
BURKE CT.
0 0
O w
U
U fV
KOHLMAN AVE.
L
'
cn
Q
z
ST w
O S
3
_
0
AVE.
W
19 �
W
0
0
0
V)
°
,
Markham
-�
AVE. V)
Pond
V
Cr
�Ey
Z
U
V)
Z
z North
Hczelwood
"5 Pork
M
w
ROAD
'
C
W
V)
M
W
23
�<< ro
V)
COP
10
-�
AVE. V)
n
Cr
�Ey
Z
U
b LARK � CT.
Z
:D
w
o
o cr ��
Lake
`
w
�
0 ¢ _
CO. RD.
mmomfta
�
W
Z
�
(n
o
LAURIE Z RD.
CON NOR
�
LELAND RD.
c�
�
w
WEDGE
z AVE. w
AVE.
BURKE CT.
� O
p
?..
¢
0
JUNCTION AVE. w
_
Timber i
DEMONT
AVE.
m
O
Moplecrwt
Hgon�*eat BROOKS
AVE.
� BROOKS
V)
BURKE AVE. 0
o
®
BURKE AVE. C
Pork
AV
Q
�
Mp
(n
AVE.
a
•
SEX
TANT
AVE.
Z r- Four 9
� � �Par�k
Off' NT
3
LN.
64
AVE. s
Z
C Ov RSE
GERVAIS
BELMONT
E.
AV
}- GERVAIS
��
Gotewo
w �
¢
g
w
qv
SKILL ��
SKILL MAN
AVE.
v GRANDVIEW
HARRIS AVE.
z
OOD
SH��
j
c�
AVE.
w
J V)
o RYAN
m VIKING
DR.,
Y
Av
SHERREN `AVE.
RY AN AV.
AVE. S. J
LOCATION MAP
z
4
N
'
v
Or
COPE
I
Ki e ad Lake
L---
COP
-�
AVE. V)
n
Keller /
b LARK � CT.
W �.:
(n
AVE.
�!= LARK = AVE.
w
0
60
Lake
`
25
0 ¢ _
CO. RD.
mmomfta
�.
V v
LAURIE RD.
�
(n
o
LAURIE Z RD.
�� ��
LELAND RD.
o Q
_ =
SANDH URST
Z sherwood0
Q Park
z AVE. w
¢
BURKE CT.
� O
p
?..
¢
0
JUNCTION AVE. w
_
Timber i
tj z
G on
Po ®
V)
B V)
w
0
Lj Y CO. RD.
Moplecrwt
o
� (1)
F .,, - a
Pork J ClRKE
CHAMBERS ST (� �
�
AVE. m
BURKE AVE. 0
o
®
BURKE AVE. C
Pork
AV
Q
�
Mp
ELDR IDGE
AVE.
John Glenn
Off' NT
3
LN.
64
C Ov RSE
c NVE.
�P�
BELMONT
E.
w
AVE.
=
��
Gotewo
OO�F
K
qv
SKILL ��
SKILL MAN
AVE.
HARRIS AVE.
N
OOD
SH��
j
ROSEWOOD AVE. N
J V)
o RYAN
U Robinhood
P O D `
,�
ROSEW00 D
Av
RY AN AV.
AVE. S. J
w
Trail M
F71;ek
Q
z W
En to V)
-
F
28
27
FROST
Pork (n
)
o w in
a.
AVE.
cn 5
-
7-L
w (�1
n
LOCATION MAP
z
4
N
PROPERTY LINE, /ZONING MAP
3
4
N
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Gervois Avenue
=00
u smason
P
4o 2444 Zr0ft t sNO
=wa
ARCA
R
pass �
PowtR POLE
TOTAL AREA sow .75 S. r. �.
MY ROOD 12770 S.r.
Ex7STV4 TDwER 6300.00 S.r.
PROPOSED AMA s 17u.s 1 S.r.
AOTRWOUS AREA KM. 976 &F.
AARKWO 2300 S.r.
TOTAL 3276 &r. ss
PCWVOZ AREA CRASS 3924 sr.
GRAVEL 37700 &r
M OtSTLIMCD 21&17.31 Sr.
TOTAL 38456.71 sr. 6'53;
SITE PLAN
4
4
Attachment 4
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, March 27, 2000
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 00 -06
2. 7:10 Wheeler Lumber Landscape Material Center (Southwest Comer of English Street and Gervais
Avenue)
A. Conditional Use Permit
B. Design Plan Approval
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Acting City Manager Haider introduced the staff report.
c. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Gary Pearson presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Boardmember John La Casse presented the Community Design Review Board report.
f. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
Ken Fields, Representing wheeler, 3340 Republic Avenue, St. Louise Park
John Olson, Representing Wheeler
Terry Anders, Representing Wheeler
g. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved the following Resolution, approving a conditional use permit for the outdoor
storage of landscape materials on the property at t e southwest corner o ervais Avenue and English Street.
Th e city bases approval on the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions:
RESOLUTION 00 -03 -038
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Wheeler Lumber, LLC, applied for a conditional use permit for outdoor storage:
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at the southwest corner of Gervais Avenue and
English Street. The legal description is:
THE EAST 353 FEET OF BLOCK 24, CLIFTON ADDITION EXCEPT THE SOUTH 100 FEET
THEREOF, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
11
5
1. On March 6, 2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On March 27, 2000 the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance
to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of
the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use
permit based on the building and site plans. The city approves this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the
city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property,
because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water
runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into
the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one Y ear.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The city council may require more parking spaces should the need arise.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on March 27, 2000.
12
6
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the plans. dated January 27, 2000, for the Wheeler. Lumber and
Landscape materials storage facility on the southwest comer of ng is Street and Qervais Avenue, base on the
in mgs required by the code. The property owner or applicant s
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Submit the following to staff for approval before getting a building permit:
a. A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan.
b. A landscape plan. for the -lawn on the east side of the site. This area shall be sodded and
planted with a combination of evergreen trees and deciduous trees and shrubs.
3. Complete the following before getting an occupancy permit:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. The existing trees on the north side of the
proposed site must not be removed.
C. Provide. one van - accessible handicap parking space with loading aisle and handicap-
parking sign as the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requires.
d. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure if there will be any outdoor storage of refuse. The
enclosure must match the building in color and materials and shall have a closeable gate
that is 100 percent opaque.
e. The six - foot -tall chain link fence must have a top rail and have dark green slats around
the entire storage yard.
f. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all lawn areas on the front (east side) of the site
unless the applicant provides an alternate watering method acceptable to staff to keep the
plantings watered.
g. Provide site - security lighting as required by the city code. The light source, including the
lens covering the bulb, shall be concealed or shielded so not to cause any nuisance to
vehicle drivers or to adjacent property owners.
h. The buildings shall have matching exteriors of vertical- groove wood siding and be kept
painted or stained in good repair. The colors of the two buildings shall be the same.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
13
�7
b. The city receives cash escrow for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of
the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June
1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the
building is occupied in the spring or summer.
C. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve
minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -all
E'
Agenda C2 op tf
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manag
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, 'Director o
DATE: March 7, 2001
SUBJECT: Recreation Fund Budget Transfer
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The recreation division requests a budget transfer of $4,500 to fund the replacement of our
existing moon walk and to pay for our second phone line (modem) at Carver Elementary
School
City policy requires that the City Council approve any budget transfer from contingency
accounts. The recreation fund has adequate money in contingency account 206 - 603 -299-
4910 to cover the budget transfer request of $4,500.
The budget transfer is for two items; the first is $2,500 for replacement of our moon walk. The
moon walk is five years old and is utilized for the Mid - Summer Night program and special
events. The replacement cost of $2,500 will fund only the inflatable walk part, as we will use
the existing compressor.
The second item is to pay an outstanding bill of $2,000 to the North St. Paul /Maplewood/
Oakdale School District. The city installed a second phone line (modem) in November 1997.
The school district has been paying the monthly balance for the past four years. Recent
accounting records found the error. The issue has been resolved with the phone company,
but the school district needs to be reimbursed for past expenditures.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a budget transfer of $4,500 from the
contingency account in the recreation fund to finance replacement of the moon walk and to
pay phone bills.
kdlmoonwalk. mem
c: Dan Faust, Finance Director
interoffice
M E M O R A N D U M
to: Doug Taubman
from: Mike Graf
subject: Moon Walk Replacement
date: January 25, 2001
Our moon walk is five years old. We used the moon walk twice a week all summer. The MCC
uses the moon walk for special events. And some of our local schools also used the moon walk.
Steve and I spent about three hours repairing it last season. The seams keep breaking in the same
areas and are now beyond repair. Anew system cost $3795.00. We only need the inflatable
walk part and not the compressor. The inflatable walk is $2300.00 as of September 12, 2000. We
will go through the same company that we originally purchased this system from. The name of
the company is UCS, Inc..
I� � FOR MORE INFORMATION E -MAIL info C ucss iri�t.com
"N ----
Space Walk
UCS Space walk is a 14' x 14' air - inflated enclosure
which is excellent for movement activities for children of
all ages including toddlers and preschoolers. Full of
wonderful, fun filled sensations, our Space Walk can be
used for both special and elementary
education programs and is a must for ;MOVEM!ENT!E • parks and recreation progra ms. Let your children discover P.E. a new world. Each space walk contains it 's own portable, DUCATION
high pressure power supply system. MSPEGA L EDUCATION
SPACE WALK
DAY CARE
REHABILITATION
NORTH ST PAUL - MAPLEWOOD - OAKDALE SCHOOLS
NORTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55109
INVOICE
TO: City of Ma iewood No.
Address:
Mare lewood. Mn 55109 Date: 12/20/2000
0
NOTICE
All Bills Due and Payable I
within 30 days
i4o t I
Make All Checks Payable to:
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 622
Accounts Receivable
2520 E. 12` Avenue
North St. Paul, MN 55109
US West local phone service for 651- 702 -0677 at Carver Elementary
(Used for computer)
r For Nov. 97 - Dec. 2000 . 38 months at $50.94 per month.
Total = $1935.72
BUDGET YEAR: �� '� 6j
nn /n1
SIGNATURE
I DECLARE UNDER THE PENALTIES OF LAW THAT {�p���` (_ Bir)n1c1c,
THIS ACCOUNT, CLAIM OR DEMAND IS JUST AND NAME
CORRECT AND THAT NO PART OF IT HAS BEEN ASS 0 C- - I AqE. b I R- EcTa2 O F- 'T
PAID. TITLE
PHONE
CREDIT ACCOUNT AS FOLLOWS:
CODE 01
CODE:
CODE:
CODE:
Return One Copy of Invoice with Payment
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Chink Ahl, City Engineer
FROM: Lance Lundsten, Public Works Coordinator
SUBJECT: Agenda Item -- Rubber -Tired Loader Replacement
DATE: Larch 29, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Council approval is required for expenditures exceeding
J
BACKGROUND
Action by Council
}ate
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The 2001 capital outlay operating budget contains an amount of $188,450.00 for the
replacement of a 1991 model year rubber -tired loader. The cost of replacement, using
state bid ##425196 and the trade of the old loader, is $124,650.79. Zie ler } Inc. of
0
Minneapolis has been awarded the state contract to provide this equipment.
RECOMMENDATION
N
Request council authorization to enter into a contract with Ziegler, Inc., under state
contract #425196, for purchase of the replacement machine in the amount of
$124
meo
Attachment
z`
CITY OF MAPL D
iY Y.J'
_ ,J�•
830
1
East .� tC
County d
Y
a
Maplewood, MN 55 09
::xis• 'ir
Together Nye Can
VENDOR: 01805
ZIEGLER INC.
SDS 12 -0436
PO BOX 86
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55486 -0436
FOB Point:
Terms: Net 30
Req. Del. Date:
Special Inst:
MODEL 928 -G WHEEL LOADER -
AS PER QUOTE OF 1/11/01
LESS TRADE
PAGE 1 / 1
£ .: : ?:.TY.J. v.•JJ:: .,.:...: :.. <:.Y.: -.r.•;Hay :J
'< } r J.Av.:,2•.. .T)l:. .,' \.. .,0. C:a }li { <::•` }:+i }:.:::::. .�:n.:v::. �.
a ;: r,.3 .e3�.�'x."fi:}. :, t� /.: ; .,� } r,•. <. rain:` �:£ „y ♦,., a :� �J ::ii: ? >2ryv t ?..
::$�C�,C, }Z . Y. 2}. ..���: 'r.'k <.:: n4•:v:;��:.T :.y :£•,: ?::1'„ .: � iJ:'.'i:,i:
: }r \•)'I.. a:.. .2 n. f. l...n.. �ll. +; f,- ,v }fif. {•h: •: k•: w.:.:.: n. : ':Oi+.'•i >.ivt {i.:Jr <:
1/24/01 100058
SHIP TO CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1830 E COUNTY ROAD B
MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 -2702
Req. No.:
Dept EQUIPMENT - PURCHASED
Contact: LANCE LUNDSTEN
Confirming? NO
157,025.79
32, 375.00
r p,40 of
2
BILL TO: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD susrorAL 124 650.79 rAx 0.00
1830 E COUNTY RD "B" FREIGHT 0.00
MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 -2702 TOTAL 124,650.79
VENDOR COPY Authorized Signature
Agenda Item_/
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: April 03, 2001
RE: Temporary Beer and Carnival License Approval
Introduction
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modred
Rejected
Kay Mottaz has applied for carnival and temporary beer licenses for the Church of the
Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary. The event will be held at Presentation, 1725 Kennard
Street, May 5 and May 6, 2001. The event will be held from 11:3 0 a.m. 9:00 p.m. on May 5, and
11:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on May 6. They will not serve beer until noon on both days.
The fees have been paid and proper insurance requirements have been provided.
Recommendation
It is recommend that Council approve both licenses contingent upon the applicant meeting
inspection requirements by the Maplewood Fire Department for the carnival.
_g Agenda Item_
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: April 03, 2001
RE: Resolution - Building Quality Communities
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Introduction
The League of Minnesota has launched a public education campaign called Building g
Communities to enhance the perception of Minnesota cities and increase citizen trust and
participation in their local government. They are requesting that cities wishing to participate in
this endeavor pass the following resolution.
Resolution Building Quality Communities
WHEREAS, the top values and priorities of citizens include safety, family, job opportunities,
health, the well -being of children, and recreational opportunities; and
WHEREAS, many of the services cities provide directly enhance those citizen priorities; and
W IEREAS, the connection between city services and how they benefit citizen priorities and
concerns is not always understood by citizens; and
WHEREAS, it is one of the responsibilities of city officials to ensure legislators, media and
citizens understand their governments through open and frequent communication using various avenues
and means; and
W]H EREAS, it is important to encourage citizens to actively participate in city government, to
share their views, and to work in partnership with city officials to ensure that the needs of the community
are met; and
WTHEREAS, partnerships developed between citizens and city officials can result in greater
understanding of the connection between Minnesota's high quality of life and the services provided by
Minnesota cities, as well as in greater trust by citizens in the efforts of their city government;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood hereby declares its
commitment to join in the "Minnesota Cities: Building Quality Communities" statewide educational
effort in cooperation with our fellow members of the League of Minnesota Cities. We hereby designate
Richard Fursman as the City of Maplewood's key contact for this effort, and will inform the League of
Minnesota Cities of this designation.
AGENDA ITEM G �`
AGENDA REPORT
A ction by Coun
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
Date
Endorsed
FROM: R. Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer •
1VIad�fied
DATE: April 3, 2001
Rejected
SUBJECT: Approve Payment of Sewer Repair --1353 Skillman Avenue East
Introduction
A property owner on Skillman Avenue experienced a major sewer repair project that involved
the repair of a portion of the city's sewer main. Negotiations with the rop e �y owner the sewer
p
contractor and the city's insurance trust have resulted in a settlement agreement that is contingent
upon city council approval.
Background
Tom Spoden, 1353 Skillman Avenue East, has been experiencing sewer problems for over 10
years. The city's main line was not the cause of his problems, so Mr. Spoden hired a contractor,
A -1 Rootmaster, to repair his sewer service line. Due to the depth of the sewer service and
problems with the connection to the sewer main, A -1 Rootmaster incurred costs of $18,095.34.
The major cause of the sewer problems was discovered to be an improperly constructed section
of the main sewer line installed in 1958. The city's insurance coverage is through the League of
Minnesota City's Insurance Trust (LMCIT).
Following lengthy debate and discussions involving all parties, the following settlement was
negotiated:
Tom Spoden share: $ 4
A -1 Rootmaster bill reduction: $ 4,300.00
LMCIT: $ 6,224.34
City Sewer Utility: 3
Total Claim $18,095.34
* City agrees to repair street at estimated cost of $3,500.00.
S ewer Repair -13 5 3 Skillman Av E Page .2 April 3, 2001
Recommendation
The settlement agreement at 1353 Skillman Avenue East is recommended as a reasonable
resolution of a very difficult situation for a property owner. The sewer problem was beyond the
property owners control. Because the city has a $200,000 aggregate deductible, and the limit
has not been reached for this year, the amount listed for LMCIT will also need to be aid b the
. p Y
Sewer Utility. The final payment by the city to A -1 Rootmasterwll - be $ Ap proval of
this payment is recommended.
RCA
jW
Agenda �
MEMORA M
TO: Richard Fursman, City an Action by. Council
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Di r s nd Re eation Dam
Endorsed
DATE: April 4, 2001 for the Ap I 0 City Council eeting � MUM
SUBJECT: Edgerton Park Plans and Specificatio
INTRODUCTION
The Maplewood City Council approved the master plan and authorization to retain a landscape
architect to complete plans and specifications for phase one of the development of Edgerton Park.
During the past three months, staff has been immersed in the plans and specifications stage and
the construction documents are currently complete. The project is ready to go to bid and has been
budgeted in the amount of $565,000 for phase one.
BACKGROUND
Edgerton Park has been in the planning stages for the past four years. The project has involved
extensive community involvement and numerous meetings with the Roseville school district. The
phase one project is scheduled to begin May 15 and scheduled for completion September 1, 2001.
The park project will be the single largest park improvement in the history of the Maplewood park
system, with the exception of the three community centers. The project is currently funded at the
level of $565,000. Preliminary estimates indicate that the phase one project is at $800,000. The
increase in cost estimates are due to a number of issues including:
1. Size and location of pond
2. Additional storm sewer piping requirements
3. Fencing around pond
4. Major electrical modifications for the irrigation pump system due to lack of three phase power
5. Extended fencing along roadway
We are currently looking at ways to modify the plan to reduce the cost. It is staffs recommendation
to bid the project. Following the bids, we will provide a recommendation to the City Council as to
which phases of the project should be reduced and /or alternative funding options to complete the
project. Staff strongly feels that the phase one project needs to be bid as it currently is proposed, as
each of the items are integral to the success of the project. A copy of the final plans and
specifications is available in the City Council office for your review and consideration.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and authorizes staff to bid the Edgerton
Park improvement project with the understanding that awarding of bids will be forwarded to the City
Council for final approval with either funding options and /or reductions in the proposed phase one
project.
kMedgertn.mem
BID FORM 00500
��� .; },�' : ;.. # ".5:'•'4'.S�.Nt .. ,7r 'c4p.. '�:�?S. .:C i19?� ^r.M.yK•. .��>. roev�.:.a:QrxiC
':' .�Y::. � <: °`{�'� a at t }�F { 7 i��:Y�'•' ?Y. .'•� y..,+., a}�:��ycpce,�;•rfry
:Gi.,:.:.:22?i$: : %, %: R£3m:� `Dy+/. •x:xa :, .? ?•; .: : ,r,- ., <•: t'. a >.3��•�:.;�•0:0� `Y >:::t;;:.
ia;.w. . Lc:•: n �R1oGb�F33:. �' G:? . co: a} }:::6}A�d:;?Fi�,sici�b'�'.' -:6� ' 'Lbi$si55::: ^y: ..: "' ":,. > .r`:t: M .r.... ¢ r<
.>3'65: t• ».,,Y'A,t%:'?A: Sr.3�C�)�:Y7�•ii.,}.•.�,nc �wu: a:?? �iJ$ �`' is'} 4! �° x�l �RYoSa� ,c<Y�i�v3`'to°33t,:�i`'a>t'•}
PROPOSAL:
PROJECT:
OWNER:
PROJECT
CONSULTANT:
BID
SUB
MI
SSI
ON
DATE AND TIME
SUBMITTED BY:
Edgerton Park General Site Improvements
Edgerton Park
Maplewood, Minnesota
Maplewood Parks & Recreation Department
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Brauer & Associates Ltd.
10417 Excelsior Boulevard, Suite 1
Hopkins, MN 55343
• d on... „ .}:? 4
•ter w: >::;'
i :
s are due ed�:::Ax�� 2r1 } a =Zi�O
B:m��lOC�tt #rte at the office of Bruce Anderson,
3 Parks and Recreation Director, City Hall (a the Owner's address defined above
Name:
Address:
(Type or Print Clearly)
Contact:
Telephone: FAX:
OFFER: BIDDER- will complete the work according to the following:
(a) The quantities indicated for "UNIT PRICE” bid items are for the convenience of the
Bidder and are not guaranteed "UNIT PRICE" bids shall include all labor, materials,
storing, equipment, overhead, profit, insurance, tags, etc. necessary to cover the work
described in the contract documents. Final payment to the contractor for "UNIT PRICE"
bid items shall be based on field measured quantities and the contractor's unit bid P rice
for completing the work outlined in the contract documents.
(b) Each Bidder must verify or establish quantities and the extent of work to their own
satisfaction for "LUMP SUM" bid items, and submit a total bid sufficient to cover all the
work Outlined in the contract documents. "LUMP SUM" bids shall include all labor,
materials, storing, equipment, overhead, profit, insurance, tags, etc. necessary to cover
the2 work described in the contract documents. Final pay merit to the contractor for "LUMP
SUM" bid items shall be based on the contractor's bid price for completion of the work
outlined in the contract documents.
(c) The bid form has the following schedules in the following order.
1) Base Bid Schedule
2) Alternate Bid Schedule
The contractor is required to provide a bid price for all schedules and bid items. Award of
contract will be as stipulated under "Award of Contract" on the last page of this bid form.
Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Edgerton Park Site Improvements
Project #00 -37 DOCUMENT 00500 -1 Maplewood, MN
Edgerton Park Base Bid Schedule
UNITS LEGEND: LS = Lump Sum, SF = Square Feet, SY = Square Yard, EA = Each, LB = Pound
LF = Lineal Feet, FF = Face Feet, CY = Cubic Yards (in place measure) TN = Ton
e ta
�ck
Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Edgerton Park Site Improvements
Project #00 -37 DOCUMENT 00500 - 2 Maplewood, MN
No.
Section 1 - Removals
Plan
Unit
Unit Bi
Total Bid Kt?
Descfiption
Qty.
(In
(In Dollars) it V1
1
Remove all specifically identified items as shown on sheet L1 (all other
1
LS
10,000.00
10
removals shall be by owner unless shown otherwise in the alternate bid
schedule)
Section 1 - Removals Total
10
No. Section.2 - Earthwork Plan Unit Unit Bid
Total Bid
Description Qty. (In Dollars)
(In Dollars)
1
On -site earthwork as required to achieve plan grades and an on -site
1
LS
125,000.00
125,000.00
balance - complete, including: 1) stripping, stockpiling, respreading, and
fine grading topsoil to 6" settled depth; 2) common excavation and
placement of subsoil materials to subgrade elevations in all work areas; 3)
roadways and parking lots subsoil corrections / compaction; and 4) grade
maintenance as necessary for duration of construction period; (does not
include erosion control fence, wood fiber blanket or bale checks under this
item)
2
Furnish and place tree protective fencing as indicated on plan sheet L3.0
700
LF
1.75
1
and as directed by LA -E at time of construction
3
Furnish and place erosion control fencing as indicated on plan sheet
2
LF
2.50
5
EC -1 (including removal of fencing upon completion of project and
vigorous growth of seeded area
4
Furnish and_ place bale checks as indicated on plan sheet EC -1 -
1
LS
2,000.00
2
(including removal of bale checks upon completion of project and vigorous
g rowth of seeded areas)
5
Furnish and place compacted infield aggregate in infield to 5" depth (in-
2
TON
15.00
31
1
place measure)
Section 2 - Earthwork Total
165,225.00
No. Section 3 - Utilities (Storm Sewer & Water Service) Plan Unit Unit Bid
Total Bid
Description Qty. (in Dollars)
(In Dollars)
1 Furnish and install. Storm Sewer System - complete 1 LS 65
65
2 Furnish and i nstall Water Service for Irrigation Pump - complete 1 I LF 12,000.00
12, .000.00
Section 3 - Utilities (Storm Sewer & Water Service) Total
77
No. Section 4 - Asphalt/Concrete Plan Unit Unit Bid
Total Bid
Description Qty. (In Dollars)
(In Dollars)
1
Furnish and place asphalt paving for parking lot & sport court,
6
SY
12.50
85,625.00
including 1 1/2" MnDOT 2331 Type 31 base course, 1 1/2" MnDOT 2331
Type 41A wearing course and 6" MnDOT 3138 Class 5A aggregate -
comp lete
e ta
�ck
Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Edgerton Park Site Improvements
Project #00 -37 DOCUMENT 00500 - 2 Maplewood, MN
2 Fumish and place heavy -duty asphalt paving for drive /roadway, 1 SY 14.00 27 790.00
including 2 1/2" MnDOT 2331 Type 31 base course, 1 1/2" MnDOT 2331
.Type 41A wearing course and 8" MnDOT 3138 Class 5A aggregate -
complete
3
Furnish and place asphalt paving for general trails, - including 2"
1
SY
11.50
17,537.50
MnDOT 2331 Type 41A wearing course and 6 MnDOT 3138 Class 5A
aggregate - complete
LF
9.00
23,040.00
4
Furnish and place MnDOT B612 concrete curb and gutter for parking lot
2
and drives - complete
5
Furnish and place 4" thick concrete paving (4000 psi) for walks, bleacher
7
SF
3.75
28
pads, bench pads, etc. - complete
LS
1
6
Paint parking lot stalls and miscellaneous lines / turn lane arrows /
1
1
hands cap parking areas in parking lots - complete
LS
1
7
Paint line striping of sport court as indicated on detail 1 /L11 -
1
1
complete
185,023.75
Section 4 - Asphalt and Concrete Total
No. Section 5 - Irrigation System Plan Unit Unit Bid
Total Bid
Description Qty. (In Dollars)
(in Dollars)
1 Furnish and install irrigation system as shown on sheet IR -1: complete - 1 LS 95
95,000.00
including plumbing and hookup of mechanical pump by a licensed plumber
Section 5 - Irrigation System Total
95,000.00
- ------------- -
No. Section 6 - Fencing Plan Unit Unit Bid
Total Bid
Description Qty. (In Dollars)
(In Dollars)
1
Furnish and install 30'x 20'x 30' chainlink fence backstop on
1
EA
12,000.00
12
baiifield #1 - including overhead net assembl
2
Furnish and install 20'x 20'x 20' chainlink fence backstop on
3
EA
9,000.00
27,000.00
balifields #2, #3, & #4 - complete including overheadnet assembl
3
Furnish and install 60" high - 2 rail black vinyl -clad chainlink fence
330
LF
20.00
6,600.00
(along roadway) - complete
EA
850.00
1,700.00
4
Furnish and install 60" high x 10' wide black vinyl -clad chainlink gate -
2
complete
LF
20.00
10,200.00
5
Furnish and install 60" high - galvanized chainlink fence (adjacent to
510
pond) - complete
750.00
6
Furnish and install 60" high x 10' wide galvanized chainlink gate -
1
EA
750.00
complete
LF
24.00
51,960.00
7
Furnish and install 8' high - 3 rail chainlink fence (@ ballfields & adjacent
2
to east side of pond) -complete
LF
35.00
6,720.00
8
Furnish and install 8' high - 4 rail chainlink fence (players bench area) -
192
complete
9
Furnish and install 8' high x 2' wide chainlink fence mangate (outfields)
4
EA
425.00
1
- complete
EA
455.00
,700.00
1
10
Furnish and install 8' high x 3' wide chainlink fence mangates (infields) -
4
complete
EA
745.00
2
11
Furnish and install 8' high x 12' wide chainlink fence double gate
4
infields - complete
Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Edgerton Park Site Improvements
Project #00 -37 DOCUMENT 00500 - 3 Maplewood, MN
No.
Section 7 - Site Amenities & Miscellaneous Items
Plan
Unit
Unit Bid Total Bid
1
Description
Qty.
LS
(In Dollars) (In Dollars)
2
Furnish and place Type II seed for irrigated turf areas - complete
1
LS
4 4,500.00
1
Furnish and install 19' long - 5 row bleachers - (JW Industries, Inc. Model
4
EA
4 18
4
#5R1 9A -1 GR) - complete (does not include concrete pad)
26,250
SY
2.50 65,625.00
2
Furnish and install basketball goals - direct bury (Miracle Recreation
2
EA
1,200.00 2
MVP Goalsetter - Model # BA39U ) - complete
300.00 1
3
Furnish and install tetherball assemly - direct bury - (Landscape
4
EA
Structures - Model #100070A) - complete
4
Furnish and install 24' players bench with backrest - direct bury (JW
8
EA
1 15
Industries, Inc.) - complete does not include concrete pad)
5
Furnish and install single swing arm barrier gate as indicated on plans -
1
LS
1 1,500.00
complete
6
Reinstall salvaged double swing arm barrier gate as indicated on plans -
1
LS
500.00 500.00
complete
7
Furnish and install traffic signage as indicated on plans (including stop
1
LS
2 2
signs, do not enter signs, busses only signs, hands -cap signs, etc.) -
complete
Section 7 - Site Amenities & Miscellaneous Items Total 41,300.00
No. Section 8 - Site Electrical Plan Unit Unit Bid Total Bid
Description Qty. (ln Dollars) (In Dollars)
1 Furnish and install site electrical system, as defined on electrical sheet 1 LS 10,000.00 10
E -1
Santinn R . Affix Fleartrinsl Tn + ,mi 1 An Ann nn
No.
-----------
Section 9 - Seed & Sod
Description
Plan
Qty.
Unit
--- - ---------- -- -------
Unit Bid Total Bid
(In Dollars) (In Dollars)
1
Furnish and place Type I seed mixture pond area - complete
1
LS
2 9 500.00 2
2
Furnish and place Type II seed for irrigated turf areas - complete
1
LS
4 4,500.00
3
Furnish and place T pe III seed for non-irrigated turf areas - complete
1
LS
12 12 9 000.00
4
Furnish and place sod for placement as directed by LA -E at time of
construction - complete
26,250
SY
2.50 65,625.00
Section 9 - Seed & Sod Total 84,625.00
No. Section 10 - Construction Surveying & Staking Plan Unit Unit Bid Total Bid
Description Qty. (In Dollars) (In Dollars)
1 Perform all Construction Surveying & Staking, as required to complete 1 LS 20,000.00 20
the project .....
Section 10 - Construction Surveying & Staking Total 20
Base Bid Total: 811
Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Edgerton Park Site Improvements
Project #00 -37 DOCUMENT 00500 - 4 Maplewood, MN
Edgerton* Park Alternate Bid'Schedule
NO.
Alternate Bid Schedule
Description
Plan Unit Unit Bid Total Bid
Qty. (In Dollars) (In Dollars)
1
Screen and pulverize topsoil on all 4 balifields and soccer field
1 L S
overlays - complete, as defined on plan sheet L3.0 - Overall Grading nd
g
15,000.00 15,000.00
specification section 02923
2
Furnish and install all materials necessary to construct Play Equipment
1 LS 13,750.00
Container (East of Little League Field #2) - complete including 6 "x18"
13,750.00
concrete curb container, draintile system and connection to storm sewer
system, 12" depth of play area sand, etc.
3
Furnish and place asphalt paving for general trails, - including 2"
MnDOT 2331 Type 41A wearing course and 6" MnDOT 3138 Class
1 SY 11.50 15,812.50
5A
aggregate - complete
4
Complete soils corrections as directed by LA -E to include: 1) over-
500 CY
excavation and on -site disbursement of subsoil material and 2) import and
11.00 5,500.00
place engineered backfill meeting MnDOT Spec. 3149.2132C or G. Note:
Bid quantities and payment on a cubic yard basis shall be based on an in-
place cubic yard measure and include both excavation and disbursement
of subsoils and import, place, and compaction of engineered backfill
5
Plant all trees and shrubs as per plan sheet L4 complete including
1 LS 20,000.00
mulching individually planted materials as well as enure planting beds of
20,000.00
mass shrub plantings to a 6" depth
6
Furnish and install 4" thick x 16" wide concrete maintenance strip
1 LF
(beneath ballfield fencing and fencing along roadway) - complete
1 1,875.00
7
Furnish and install drinking fountain on concrete pad with subdrain -
1 LS 7
complete (including water service connection)
71500.00
8
Furnish and install ball rack - complete
8 EA 27500 2,200.00
9
Furnish and install bat rack - complete
8 EA 450.00 3,600.00
10
Furnish and install soccer corner markers - complete
12 LF 175.00 2,100.00
11
Furnish and install D- Thybar Balifield Equipment Boxes - complete
(does not include concrete pad)
4 EA 1 7
Alternate Bid Total: 94
End of Bid Schedules
Brauer & Associates, Ltd.
Project #00 -37
DOCUMENT 00500 - 5
Edgerton Park Site Improvements
Maplewood, MN
OWNER'S RIGHT The owner reserves the right to revise the scope of the work outlined i •
p n the contract documents. Unit
Price" bids in the base bid and alternate bid schedules shall prevail for changing quantities of work items
from those indicated.. in the contract documents.
ADDENDA The following Addenda have been received. The modifications to the Bid Documents noted therein
have
been considered and all costs thereto are included in the Bid price.
Addendum # Dated
Addendum # Dated
Addendum # Dated
CONTRACT TIME The undersigned agrees to commence work under this contract on or before the date to be specified in
written "Notice to Proceed" of the Owner with the project 100% complete on or before A as
stipulated in the specifications. Project start date is projected to be .. 6rdder further agrees
. �� .
to pay as liquidated damages to sum of one hundred dollars ($100.00) a day for each consecutive calendar
day thereafter as hereinbefore provided in Section 00811- Supplemental Conditions of the Contract
Specifications.
WITHDRAWAL
OF PROPOSAL This proposal is submitted after careful study of the Drawings and Specifications personal
and from
g p p
knowledge of the conditions, both surface and subsoil, at park site, which knowledge was obtained from the
undersigned's own sources of information and not from any employee of the City of Maplewood.
It is understood and agreed that proposal cannot be withdrawn within sixty (60) calendar days without the
consent of the City of Maplewood. The City of Maplewood has the right to reject any or all proposals.
A Bidder's Bond or Certified or Cashier's Check in the amount of not less than two percent (5 %) of your
total bid made payable to City of Maplewood, is attached herewith and shall be considered liquidated
damage to the Owner if bidder is awarded the contract but fails to enter into a contract in accordance with
this Proposal.
SUBMITTAL
REQUIREMENTS Each bidder shall be required to submit the following information and data. Information not submitted at the
bid opening must be submitted prior to award of the contract.
1. Affidavit of Non- Collusion
2. Non- Discrimination Affidavit
3. Acknowledgment of receipt of addendum
4. Affirmative Action Certification
5. Any other items specifically required by the contract documents.
AWARD OF
CONTRACT The contract for the work outlined in the contract document and this proposal form, will be awarded to the
lowest qualified bidder. Lowest bid will be determined by the TOTAL BASE BID PRICE PLUS THE
ACCEPTED ALTERNATES.
BID FORM
SIGNATURES(S) Respectfully submitted,
Bidder is (Corporation) (Partnership) (Individual)
Firm
By
Title
Fed. Tax
ID Number
Date
Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Edgerton Park Site Improvements
Project #00 -37 DOCUMENT 00500 - 6 Maplewood, MN
AGENDA ITEM G * `' I
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: April 2, 2001
RE: Fee Waiver - Maplewood Historical Society
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Nlo fled
Rejected
The Maplewood Historical Society, as a fund raiser for the Bruentrup Farm, will participate
in the Spring Clean Up Day, on April 28th, selling doughnuts and beverages. They have
requested that the temporary food permit ($44.00) for this event be waived.
AGENDA ITEM N
-A
MEMORANDUM Action by Council
TO: City Manager Date
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
Endorsed
SUBJECT: Antenna and Tower Ordinance Modified
DATE: March 20, 2001
Rejected
INTRODUCTION
The planning commission asked city staff to review and revise the antenna and tower ordinance.
BACKGROUND
On January 13, 1997, the city council adopted the current antenna and tower ordinance.
On February 20, 2001, the planning commission considered a proposed antenna and tower
ordinance amendment. The commission tabled action on the proposed ordinance amendment to
allow staff time to investigate their questions and concerns with the proposal.
On March 5, 2001, the planning commission again considered a revised tower and antenna
ordinance. After much discussion and questions, the commission tabled action on the proposed
ordinance to allow staff to make further changes to the proposed code language.
DISCUSSION
am proposing many revisions to the ordinance. These changes are based on comments from
the planning commission and city council and are intended to strengthen and clarify the
ordinance. Areas of attention in the proposed ordinance include language about the co- location
of antennas and additional language about setback and design standards for towers.
On February 20, 2001, we received a letter from Peter Coyle of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly and
Lindgren, the law firm that represents VoiceStream Minneapolis, a personal wireless
communication service provider. (See the letter starting on page 3.) His letter expressed several
concerns about the proposed ordinance and recommended several changes to the ordinance.
Staff has reviewed these concerns and made changes to Sections 36- 606(2) and 36- 610(6)(2) of
the proposed ordinance to address some of the concerns.
An important change to note in the proposed ordinance is Section 36 -606 (5) about tower height
and co- locating in residential zoning districts. I am proposing to increase the maximum height of
towers in residential areas from 100 feet to 125 feet. This change should allow for easier co-
location of antennas and will hopefully lessen the number of towers in the city.
Another matter to consider with this ordinance amendment is whether the city wants to allow
towers as a permitted use (rather than as a conditional use) in some locations. For example, the
city might allow a tower in the BC (business commercial) or M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning
districts as a permitted use if the tower would be 350 or 500 feet-fro-m- a residential property line.
The city could still require the tower and base equipment to meet certain design and performance
standards and to be approved by the Community Design Review Board (CDRB). The city may
want to consider such changes after adopting the proposed ordinance amendment.
COMMISSION ACTION
On March 19, 2001, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed ordinance
amendment.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the ordinance starting on page 7. This ordinance revises and updates the regulations
about commercial use antennas and towers in Maplewood.
p:lord\tower.5
Attachments:
1 Letter dated February 19, 2001 from Peter Coyle
2. Proposed ordinance
2
Attachment 1
ROBERT L. HOFFMAN
GERALD H. FRIEDELL
EDWARD J. DRISCOLL
GENE N. FULLER
JOHN D. FULLMER
FRANK 1. HARVEY
CHARLES S. MODEL.L
CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN
LINDA H. FISHER
THOMAS P. STOLTMAN
MICHAEL C. JACKMAN
JOHN E: DIEHL
JON S. SWIERZEWSKI
THOMAS J. FLYNN
JAMES P. QUINN
TODD 1. FREEMAN
GERALD L SECK
JOHN S. LUNDQUIST
DAYLE NOLAN'
JOHN A. COTTER'
PAUL S. PLUNKETT
ALAN L. KILDOW
KATHLEEN M. PICOTTE NEWMAN
MICHAEL B. LEBARON
GREGORY E. KORSTAD
GARY A. VAN CLEVE `
TIMOTHY J. KEANE
ALAN M. ANDERSON
MICHAEL W. SCHLEY
RONN B. KREPS
TERRENCE E. BISHOP
GARY A. RENNEKE '
CHRISTOPHER J. HARRISTHAL
KENDEL J. OHLROGGE
BRUCE J. DOUGLAS
WILLIAM C. GRIFFITH, JR.
JOHN R. HILL
PETER J. COYLE
LARRY D. MARTIN
JANE E. BREMER
JOHN J. STEFFENHAGEN
MICHAEL J. SMITH
February 19, 2001
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
Associate Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Roberts:
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 8L LINDGREN, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1500 WELLS FARGO PLAZA
7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 -1194
TELEPHONE (952) 835 -3800
FAX (952) 896 -3333
--4F. Rtf7'
FREDERICK W. NIEBUHR
{ RENEE L. JACKSON
l WILLIAM G. THORNTON
CHRISTOPHER K. LARUS
DOUGLAS M. RAMLER
ANN M. MEYER
STEPHEN J. KAMINSKI
SHARNA A. WAHLGREN
JOHN F. KLOS
ADAM S. HUHTA `
NICHOLAS A.J. VUETSTRA
C. ERIK HAWES
JAMES M. SUSAG
DANIEL J. BALLINTINE
JOHN A. MACK
JEFFREY D. CAHILL
SEAN D. KELLY
SONYA R. BRAUNSCHWEIG
JOSEPH J. FITTANTE, JR.
JONATHAN J. FOGEL
CYNTHIA M. KLAUS
MARK D. CHRISTOPHERSON
NEAL J. BLANCHETT
TAMARA O'NEILL MORELAND
JAMES A. MCGREEVY, III
THOMAS A. GUMP `
TODD A. TAYLOR
CHRISTOPHER J. DEIKE
MARLA M. LACK
DIONNE M. BENSON
JEREMY C. STIER
OF COUNSEL
JAMES P. LARKIN `
JACK F. DALY
D. KENNETH LINDGREN
ALLAN E. MULLIGAN
JOSEPH GITIS
' ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN
This firm represents VoiceStream Minneapolis, Inc. ( "VoiceStream ") in connection with its development
of personal wireless communication facilities ( "PCS ") within the State of Minnesota. VoiceStream's
system requirements may,.in the future, entail construction of PCS facilities within the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota ( "the City ").
We have reviewed the proposed revisions to Chapter 36, Article XI of the City Code, the Commercial Use
Antennas and Towers Ordinance ( "the Tower Ordinance " ). This letter represents VoiceStream's
comments on some of the revisions. We are pleased to have the opportunity to state our position on the
proposed changes to the Tower Ordinance. In addition, we welcome the chance to address this issue in
any public hearing held on the matter.
The City's current Tower Ordinance, and its proposed revisions, present a good framework for the
regulation of telecommunications towers and antennas and is generally compatible with VoiceStream's
plans. The Tower Ordinance gives wireless service providers the ability to site telecommunications
facilities within the City while giving the City control over the location, height and design of the
structures. This allows the City to fulfill its regulatory function and allows the creation of a PCS network
within the City in conformity with the requirements of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. §
332(c)(7) ( "the Telecommunications Act ").
The Telecommunications Act requires that cities accommodate new wireless facilities, to the extent
feasible. No city may enact an ordinance which has the effect of prohibiting the availability of wireless
services. Moreover, no city may enforce its ordinances in such manner as to discriminate against
3
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
February 19, 2001
Page 2
telecommunications service providers; the mere fact that land -line phone services or other wireless
services exist in the community is not a basis for rejecting the development of new wireless service
capacity. Cities are expressly prohibited from regulating the environmental effects of PCS facilities.
Finally, the actions of a city must be based on substantial evidence, supported by a record and written
findings.
The City's responsibility is to revise the Tower Ordinance so that it protects the City's inhabitants'
health, welfare and safety while, at the same time, allowing the development of a wireless communication
network. To be constitutionally valid, an ordinance must be "rationally related to the achievement of a
legitimate government purpose." Skeen v. State of Minnesota, 505 N.W. 2d 299, 312 (1993). It must
also be certain in its terms. City of St. Paul v. Morris 104 N.W. 2d 902 (1960), cert. denied 365 U.S. 815
(1961). Courts will analyze a zoning action to determine whether it is reasonable. Honn v. City of Coon
Ra pids, 313 N.W. 2d 409 (1981). In making that determination, courts look into the circumstances of the
decision. Therefore, a city has an obligation to keep a record to demonstrate a factual basis for its zoning
decision. C.R. Investments, Inc. v. City of Shoreview, 304 N.W. 2d 320, 328 (1981).
VoiceStream cautions the City to carefully examine any revisions to the Tower Ordinance in light of the
requirements of the Telecommunications Act. Some of the proposed revisions contained in the February
13, 2001 draft of the Tower Ordinance will make the continued development of a wireless
communications network more difficult. This could place the City in the position of effectively
preventing the provision of PCS service within its boundaries in violation of the Telecommunications Act.
Below are our comments on portions of the draft Tower Ordinance:
Section 36 -600. Purpose
Section 36- 600(5)(a)(1) slightly expands the type of structure available for permitted telecommunications
tower siting. This provision allows antennas to be located on water tanks, as well as, water towers.
Section 36- 600(b) also expands the primary land use areas where telecommunications towers can be sited
with a Conditional Use Permit ( "CUP "). The revision allows the siting of telecommunications towers in
the commercial areas of the City. It also potentially allows tower siting on City -owned property and
property owned by other governmental units.
VoiceStream appreciates the expansion of potential locations for telecommunications towers. It also
appreciates the City's effort to site antennas on structures more conducive to such equipment. However,
by creating a distinction between primary locations and structures for tower siting and other locations and
structures within the City, the Tower Ordinance limits the number of potential sites, including co- location
sites, available to providers.
The City may violate the Telecommunications Act if a tower applicant is denied a Building Permit or a
CUP after clearly demonstrating the necessity to construct a tower or site antennas on a non - primary
location or structure. VoiceStream recommends the deletion of language creating primary locations and
structures. We recommend the City evaluate each telecommunications tower application on its own
merits regarding location, height, design and technical necessity.
4
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
February 19, 2001
Page 3
Section 36 -606 Communications Towers Proposed in Residential Zoning Districts
Section 36- 606(1) allows the consideration of telecommunication tower siting within a residential zoning
district only when a proposed tower will be located on church property, parks (under certain
circumstances), City or other governmentally -owned property, schools, utilities or institutional sites or
facilities. This provision is consistent with the proposed language of Section 36 -600 of the Tower
Ordinance.
VoiceStream appreciates the City's effort to site towers on land and/or structures in residential areas
where it is conducive to do so. However, the City may violate the Telecommunications Act if a tower
applicant is denied a CUP after clearly demonstrating the necessity to construct a tower in another
residentially -zoned location. VoiceStream recommends that the first sentence of subsection 1 be revised
to read "Towers supporting commercial antennas and conforming to all applicable provisions of this
ordinance are preferred in the following residentially - zoned locations, unless the City Council determines
that an alternative location is technically necessary to achieve coverage requirements."
Section 36- 606(2) prohibits the construction of more than one (1) telecommunications tower on a
residentially -zoned piece of property. While this restriction appears to be reasonable, there are instances
where siting more than one tower on a certain piece of property is advantageous to both the City and
wireless services providers. VoiceStream recommends the deletion of Section 36- 606(2). VoiceStream
recommends the City evaluate applications on this point on a case -by -case basis.
Section 36- 606(5) limits the height of telecommunications towers in residential zoning districts to
seventy -five (75) feet and creates a setback of at least one hundred (100) feet from the nearest residential
structure. The current Tower Ordinance allows an exemption from the setback requirement when a
qualified structural engineer specifies, in writing, that any collapse will occur within a lesser distance.
VoiceStream views the 75 -foot height limitation as an unreasonable restriction which could lead to the
construction of additional telecommunications towers within residential zoning districts. Higher
telecommunications towers provide greater continuous coverage and will allow uninterrupted service
throughout the City. The tower height limitation also affects providers' ability to co- locate antennas.
VoiceStream recommends the City adopt the same height limitation in residential zoning districts as the
Tower Ordinance currently imposes in non - residential zoning districts. In addition, we recommend that
the language proposed for deletion in Section 36- 606(5) be retained in the Tower Ordinance.
Section 36 -610 Co- Location of Personal Wireless Communication Service Equipment
Section 36- 610(B)(2) requires a telecommunications tower applicant to provide coverage maps of all
existing antenna sites within one (1) mile of a proposed facility in order to demonstrate existing coverage
gaps. The language seems to require an applicant to provide information on towers not owned by it.
Wireless service providers are unlikely to provide proprietary technical information regarding the range
and coverage of telecommunications towers to competitors. The City is in possession of portions of this
information through the zoning process. Requiring an applicant to duplicate it is unreasonable.
VoiceStream recommends the deletion of this provision of Section 36 -610.
5
LARKIN, HOFFMAN DALY & LINDGREN LTD.
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
February 19, 2001
Page_ 4
VoiceStream looks forward to working with the City to develop its Tower Ordinance. Please feel free to
contact me at (952) 896 -3214 if you have any questions regarding this issue.
ely,
Peter J. Coyle, for
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN Ltd.
cc: Mr. Steve Katkov
Mr. Mike O'Rourke
Scott Slattery, Esq.
::ODMA\PCDOCS \LIB 1 \653868 \1
0
Attachment 2
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
THE CITY CODE ABOUT ANTENNAS AND TOWERS,
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
Section 1. This section changes the following parts of the Maplewood City Code: (Additions
have been underlined and deletions are crossed out.)
CHAPTER 36 ARTICLE XI
COMMERCIAL USE ANTENNAS AND TOWERS
Section 36 -600. Purpose.
To accommodate the communication needs of residents and business while protecting the
public health, safety and general welfare of the community, the Maplewood City Council finds that
these regulations are necessary to:
1. Facilitate the provision of wireless telecommunication services to the residents and
businesses of the city.
2. Require tower equipment to be screened from the view of persons located on properties
contiguous to the site and /or to be camouflaged in a manner to complement existing
structures and to minimize the visibility and the adverse visual effects of antennas and towers
throuah careful design and siting standards.
3. Ensure the operators and owners of antennas and towers desian, locate and construct
antennas and towers that meet all applicable code requirements to avoid potential
damage to adjacent properties from tower failure through structural standards and setback
requirements.
4. Maximize the use of existing and approved towers and buildings for new wireless
telecommunication antennas to reduce the number of towers needed to serve the community.
5. The following preferences shall be followed when selecting sites:
a. Primary structural location preference for wireless communication equipment as
permitted uses.
(1) Water towers or tanks.
(2) Co- location on existing towers.
(3) Church steeples or the church structure, when camouflaged as steeples, bell
towers, or other architectural features.
(4) Sides and roofs of buildings or structures over two (2) stories.
(5) Existing power or telephone pole corridors.
(6) Light poles or towers at outdoor recreational facilities.
7
(7) Parking lots may be used to locate towers F" ph where the structure
replicates, incorporates or substantially blends with the overall lighting standards
and fixtures of the parking lot.
b. Primary land use areas for towers requiring conditional use permits.
(1) Industrial and commercial.
(2) Citv -owned property (except water towers), other government -owned property,
schools, churches Gievermmelm1t, or places of worship, utility, and
institutional sites.
(3) Public parks /golf courses, when compatible with the nature of the park or
course.
(4) Open space areas when compatible with the nature of the area and site.
Section 36 -601. Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this section or ordinance shall have the following
meaning unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
Accessory structure. A use or structure subordinate to the principal use of the land or building
with a tower or antenna.
Antenna. Any structure, equipment or device used for collecting or radiating
electromagnetic waves, telecommunication. microwave, television or radio signals including but
not limited to directional antennas, such as panels, microwave dishes and satellite dishes, and
omni - directional antennas, such as whips.
Personal Wireless Communication Services. Licensed commercial wireless communication
services including cellular, personal communication services (PCS), enhanced specialized
mobilized radio (ESMR), paging and similar services.
Public Utility. Persons, corporation, or governments supplying gas, electric, transportation,
water, sewer, or land line telephone service to the public. For this ordinance, commercial wireless
telecommunication sources shall not be considered public utility uses.
Tower. Any pole, monopole, spire, or structure, or combination thereof, including supporting
lines, cables, wires, braces and masts, intended primarily for the purpose of mounting an antenna,
meteorological device, or similar apparatus above grade.
UBC. Uniform Building Code. Published by the International Conference of Building Officials
and adopted by the State of Minnesota to provide jurisdictions with building - related standards and
regulations.
Section. 36 -602. Existing antennas and towers.
Antennas, towers and accessory structures in existence as of January 13, 1997, that do not meet
or comply with this section are subject to the following provisions:
1. Towers may continue in use for the existing purpose now used and as now existing but may
not be replaced or structurally altered without meeting all standards in this section.
ON
2. If such towers are damaged or destroyed due to any reason or cause at all, (unless the user
or owner voluntarily removes the tower), the owner or operator may repair and restore the
tower to its former size, height and use within one (1) year after first getting a building permit
from the city. The location and physical dimensions shall remain as they were before the
damage or destruction.
Section 36 -603. Interpretation and Applicability.
a. It is not the intention of this ordinance to interfere with, abrogate or annul any covenant or
other agreement between parties. However, where this ordinance imposes greater restrictions
upon the use or premises for antennas or towers than are imposed or required by other
ordinances, rules, regulations or permits, or by covenants or agreements, the provisions of
this ordinance shall govern.
b. This ordinance does not apply to the use or location of private, residential citizen band radio
towers, amateur radio towers or television antennas.
Section 36 -604. Inspections and Violations.
a. All towers, antennas and supporting structures must obtain a building permit and are subject
to inspection by the city building official to determine compliance with UBC construction
standards. Deviations from the original construction that a permit is obtained, other than
antenna adjustments, is a misdemeanor.
b. Notice of violations will be sent by registered mail to the owner and the owner will have thirty
(30) days from the date the notification is issued to make repairs. The owner will notify the
building official that the repairs have been made, and as soon as possible after that, the
building official will make another inspection and the owner notified of the results.
c. Adjustments or modifications to existing antennas do not require a conditional use permit or a
building permit.
Section 36 -605. Conditional Use Permit.
a. In reviewing an application for a conditional use permit for the construction of commercial
antennas, towers, and accessory structures, the city council shall consider the:
(1) Standards in the city code.
(2) Recommendations of the planning commission and community design review board.
(3) Effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of
residents of surrounding areas.
(4) Effect on property values.
(5) Effect of the proposed use on the comprehensive plan.
b. The applicant shall provide at the time of application, sufficient information to show that
construction and installation of the antenna or tower will meet or exceed the standards and
requirements of the UBC (Uniform Building Code).
c. Conditional use permits will not be required for:
D
(1) Repair or replacement or adjustment of the elements of an antenna array affixed to a
tower or antenna, if the repair or replacement does not reduce the safety factor.
(2) Antennas mounted on water towers, sides or roof of existing structures and on existing
towers, power, light, or telephone poles.
d. The fee to be paid for the conditional use permit shall be set by city council resolution.
e. The applicant shall have a property acquisition specialist and a radio frequency, enai� neer
attend all city- related meetings to be available to answer questions
Section 36 -606. Communication Towers Proposed in Residential Zonina Districts.
No person, firm or corporation shall build or install a tower in a residential zoning district Zone
without obtaining a conditional use permit from the city council. Such a tower shall be subject to,
but not limited to, the following conditions:
1. The city will only consider such a tower in the following residentially -zoned locations or
properties:
a. Churches or places of worship.
b. Parks, when the city determines the facility would be compatible with the nature of the
park.
C. City -owned property, government, school. utility and institutional sites or facilities.
2. There shall be no more than one freestanding tower at one time on a property that the city
has planned for a residential use or that the city has zoned residentially, unless one of the
following applies:
a. The additional towers or antennas are incorporated into existing structures such as a
church steeple. light pole. power line support device or similar structure
b. The residential property is at least five (5) acres in size.
c. If the proposed tower is to replace an existing tower and if the owner /user of the existing
tower agrees to remove the existing tower within thirty (30) days of the completion of the
new or replacement tower.
3+. The applicant shall demonstrate by providing a coverage /interference analysis and capacity
analysis, that location of the tower as proposed is necessary to meet the frequency reuse and
spacing needs of the cellular or personal wireless communication services systems sysiem
and to provide adequate personal wireless communication or portable cellular telephone
coverage and capacity to areas which cannot be adequately served by locating the antennas
in a less restrictive district or on an existing structure.
42. If no existing structure that meets the height requirements for the antennas is available for
mounting the antennas, such antennas may be mounted on a tower not to exceed seventy-
five (75) feet in height. The tower shall be located a distance of at least the height of the
tower plus twenty -five (25) feet from the nearest residential structure. ,
setbael�:
10
53. The height of a tower may be increased to a maximum of one hundred twenty five 1251 one
1q. -MCAP-01 feet if the tower and base area are -ts designed and built for the co- location of
at least one other personal wireless communication service provider antennas and
equipment.
64: Transmitting, receiving and switching equipment shall be housed within an existing structure
whenever possible. If a new equipment building is necessary for transmitting, receiving and
switching, the owner or operator shall locate it at least ten (10) feet from the side or rear lot
line and shall landscape and screen it. The community design review board shall review such
a building, and the landscaping and screening. The owners and operators of all new
e ui ment or utilitv buildings and accessory structures for towers shall design and construct
such structures to blend in with the surrounding environment.
7. Towers shall not be located between a Dringipal structure and a public street unless the cit
determines that such a location would lessen the visibilit of the tower or would lessen the
negative impacts of such a facility on nearby properties
8. The city ma.y reduce or vary the required setback for a tower from a Dublic street to allow the
inte ration of a tower into an existina or promsed structure such as a church stee le light
pole, power line support device or similar structure.
9. Towers shall be built at least five 5 feet from side and rearDrgpertv lines unless the site is
next t0 a residential property line or next to a property that the City is planning for a residential
use. If the tower would be next to a residential property line or next to a propertv that the city
is planning for a residential use, then the tower must be located at least- the height of the T
tower plus twent -five 25 feet from the nearest residential structure. The owner or o erator
shall Locate around equipment and accessory structures at least five (5) feet from side and
ear propertv lines.
10. The owner or o erator of a.ny tower shall screen round - mounted a ui ment from view b
suitable vegetation, except where a design of nonvegetative screening better reflects and
complements the character of the surroundin g neighborhood
11. Tower locations should rovide the maximum amount Of screeninaDOssible for off -site views
of the facility and to lessen the visibility of the tower.
12. The existin on -site vegetation shall be Dreserved to the maximum racticable extent.
13. The - communfty,jesign review board CDRB shall make recommendations on the plans for
towers utility, a ui ment or accesso buildings, site plans and ro osed screenina and
landscaping_
14. Towers with antennas shall be desi ned and constructed to withstand a uniform wind loadin
as prescribed by the UBC (Uniform Building Code).
Section 36 -607. Construction Requirements, Setback and Height Restrictions in Zonin
Districts or Locations Other Than Residential.
No Derson. firm or cor oration shall erect a tower in a location other than residential without first
obtaining a conditional use Dermit from the city council. Such a tower shall be subject to but not
limited to. the following conditions:
11
a. No part of any tower or antenna shall be constructed, located or maintained at any time,
permanently or temporarily, in or upon any required setback area for the district in which
the antenna or tower is to be located.
b. All antennas, towers and accessory structures shall meet all applicable provisions of this
code and this section.
c. Antennas and towers shall meet the following requirements:
(1) The antennas may be mounted on a single pole or tower rnenepale not to exceed
one hundred seventy -five (175) feet in height. The pole or tower shall be setback
at least the height of the pole or tower plus twenty-five (25) feet from any
residential lot line..
(2) Metal towers shall be constructed of, or treated with, corrosive resistant material.
(3) The use of guyed towers is prohibited.
(4) Tower locations should provide the maximum amount of screening possible for
off -site views of the facility and to lessen the visibility of the tower.
(5) Existing on -site vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum practicable extent.
(6) The installation shall be designed to be compatible with the underlying site plan.
The owner or operator shall landscape the base of the tower and any accessory
structures. Accessory structures and equipment buildings shall be designed to be
architecturally compatible with any principal structures on the site. All new
equipment or utility buildings and accessory structures for towers shall be
designed and constructed to blend in with the surrounding environment The
community design review board shall review the design plans for towers, utility.
equipment or of any accessory structures, _ site plans and proposed screenings and
landscapi_na '
(7) Towers shall be a light blue or gray or other color shown to reduce visibility. No
advertising or identification visible off -site shall be placed on the tower or
buildings.
(8) Antennas placed upon the tower shall comply with all state and federal
regulations about nonionizing radiation and other health hazards related to such
facilities.
(9) Wireless telephone or personal wireless communication service antennas, where
located on an existing structure shall not extend more than twenty-five (25) feet
above the structure to which they are attached. Such antennas are a permitted
use in all zoning districts of the city. The city council, after a recommendation
from the communit si gn review board. must approve the plans for all sets of
antennas on a building after the second personal wireless communication service
provider has installed their antennas on the building.
12
(10) Towers with antennas shall be designed and constructed to withstand a uniform
wind loading as prescribed by the UBC (Uniform Building Code).
(11) Telecommunications equipment located on the side of an existing structure or on
a roof of a structure shall not be screened.
12 Towers shall not be located between a principal structure and a public street
unless the city determines that such a location would lessen the visibilitv of the
tower or would lessen the negative impacts of such a facility on nearby
properties.
.(13) The city may reduce or vary the required setback for a tower from a public street
to allow the integration of a tower into an existing or proposed structure such as a
church steeple, lightpole, power line support device or similar structure
14 Towers shall be setback at least five (5) feet from side and rear property lines
unless the site is next to a residential lot Fine. If the tower would be next to a
residential property line or next to a property that the city is planning for a
residential use, then the tower must be located at least the height of the tower
plus twent -five 25) feet from the nearest residential structure The owner or
operator shall locate ground equipment and accessory structures at least five (5)
feet from side and rear proDertv lines.
15 The owner or operator of a tower shall screen ground- mounted equipment from
view by suitable vegetation, except where a design of nonvegetative screening
better reflects and complements the character of the surrounding neighborhood
16 Tower locations should provide the maximum amount of screening_ possible for
off -site views of the facility and to lessen the visibility of the tower.
17) The existing on -site vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum practicable
extent.
The communit desi review board (CDRB) shall make recommendations on the
plans for towers, utility,, equipment or accessory buildings, site plans and
proposed screening and landscaping_
Section 36 -608. Lights i ns and Other Attachments.
"" No antenna or tower shall have affixed or attached to it in any way any lights, reflectors,
flashers, daytime strobes or steady nighttime light or other illuminating devices except:
1. Those needed during time of repair or installation,
2. Those required by the Federal Aviation Agency, the Federal Communications
Commission or the city.
3. For towers in parking lots, lights associated with the parking lot lighting.
In addition, no tower shall have constructed thereon, or attached thereto, in any way, any platform,
catwalk, crows nest, or like structure, except during periods of construction or repair.
13
No antenna or tower shall have sianaae,. advertisina or identification of any kind visible from
the around or from other structures, except necessary warning and equipment information sianaae
required by the manufacturer or by Federal, State or local authorities.
Section 36 -609. Removal of Abandoned or Damaged Towers.
Any tower and /or antenna that is not used for one (1) year shall be deemed abandoned and
may be required to be removed in the same manner and pursuant to the same procedures as for
dangerous or unsafe structures established by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 463.15 through
463.26.
Section 36 -610. Co- location of Personal Wireless Communication Service Equipment.
A. The city shall not approve a request for a new personal wireless service tower
unless it can be documented by the applicant to the satisfaction of the
city council that the telecommunications equipment planned for the proposed tower cannot be
accommodated on an existing or approved tower or commercial building within one -half mile
radius, transcending municipal borders, of the proposed tower due to one or more of the
following:
1. The planned equipment would exceed the structural capacity of the existing or approved
tower or commercial building.
2. The planned equipment would cause interference with other existing or planned
equipment at the tower or building.
3. Existing or approved structures and commercial buildings within one -half mile radius
cannot or will not reasonably accommodate the planned equipment at a height necessary
to function.
4.
AIQLI MIL , The applicant must demonstrate, by providing a city -wide
coverage /interference and capacity analysis, that the location of the antennas as
proposed is necessary to meet the frequency reuse and spacing needs of the
communication service system, and to provide adequate coverage and capacity to areas
that cannot be adequately served by locating the antennas in a less restrictive district or
on existing structure.
B. Additional Submittal Requirements. Besides the information required elsewhere in this code.
all conditional use permit applications for towers also shall include the followina information:
1. A letter of intent comrnittina the tower owner and their successors to allow the shared
use of the tower if an additional user aarees to meet reasonable terms and conditions for
shared use.
14
2. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed facilit is necessary to fill a significant
existing -gap in users coverage or to accommodate system capacity needs. This
documentation shall include:
a. Coveraaae maps of all the applicant's or the providers' existing antenna sites
within one (1) mile of the proposed facility.
b. A map showing all existing_ personal wireless communication service antenna
sites within one (1) mile of the proposed facility.
3. That the proposal is the least intrusive method of achieving the necessary coverage or
additional system capacity in the area and that other alternatives will not work.
4. That the equipment planned for the proposed tower cannot be accommodated at anv
existing tower or antenna facilitv. The cit may find that a co- location site cannot
accommodate the planned equipment for the following reasons:
a. The planned equipment would exceed the structural capacity of the preferred co-
location site, and the preferred co- location site cannot be reinforced, modified or
replaced to accommodate the planned equipment or its equivalent at a
reasonable cost, as certified by a qualified radio frequency engineer:
b. The planned equipment would significantly interfere with the usabilit of existina
or approved equipment at the preferred co- location site and the interference
cannot be prevented at a reasonable cost. as certified by a qualified radio
frequency engineer:
C. A preferred co- location site cannot accommodate the planned equipment at a
height necessary to function reasonably, as certified by qualified radio
frequency enaineer: or
d. The applicant, after a good -faith effort, is unable to lease, purchase or otherwise
secure space for the planned equipment at an existing antenna location
The cit may require the applicant to hire or pay for a study or other research by a
qualified radio frequency . engineer to determine the need for the proposed tower.
5. Materials or documentation demonstrating to the cit that the applicant has made a good
faith effort to co- Locate on existina towers but they could not reach an agreement to co-
locate on an existing tower.
6. Desian information and documentation showing how the applicant, owner or operator of
the tower has designed structuraliv. electrically and in all respects the tower to
accommodate both the applicant's antennas and the antennas for at least two (2)
additional users if the tower is equal to or more than one hundred (100) feet in heiah_ tin
all locations or for at least one (1) additional user if the tower is equal to or more than
seven -five 75) feet in height. The applicant and owner must design and install a new
tower to allow for the maximum future arrangement of antennas on the tower. to accept
antennas mounted at varying heights and to accommodate the equipment and other
needs of future users
15
7. Photo - illustrations or similar- styled artist's renderings of the proposed tower and base
site that show the appearance of the proposed tower and the proposed around
equipment or buildings after the contractor completes them.
Section 36 -611. Interference with Public Safety Telecommunications.
All new or existing telecommunications service and equipment shall meet or exceed all
Federal Communication Commission (FCC) standards and regulations and shall not interfere with
public safety telecommunications.
Section 36 -612. Additional Submittal Requirements.
Besides the information required elsewhere in this Code, building permit applications for
towers shall include the following supplemental information:
(1) A report and plans from a qualified and registered engineer or others that:
a. Describes the tower height and design including a cross section and elevation.
b. Documents the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co-
located antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas.
c. Describes the tower's capacity, including the number and type of antennas that it
can hold.
d. Includes an engineer's stamp and registration number, if applicable.
e. Includes all other information necessary for the city to evaluate the request.
Section 36 -613. Variances.
The City Council may grant variances to the requirements of this section. All variances must
follow the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. For variances reaardina antennas and
towers. the applicant must show the city the following:
1. There are unique circumstances or characteristics peculiar to the property and that the
provisions of this code would inflict undue hardship on the property owner or applicant.
2. The property cannot be developed or put to a reasonable use by strictly conforming with
the cily code.
3. The applicant or property owner did not create or cause the hardship.
4. The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the area or the zonina_
district.
5. The proposed variance is the minimum variance that will afford relief from the city code
standards.
6. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance
16
The applicant for a variance for an antenna or tower related matter shall submit with their
variance application a statement showing how the proposal would meet these findings.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city council approves it and the official
newspaper publishes it.
The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 2001.
Rordltower.5
17
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING. COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, MARCH 5, 2001
Mr. Ken Roberts gave the staff report for the city. The commission considered the update to the
antenna and tower ordinance at their last meeting during which there were questions raised about
the proposed language. The commission tabled the proposal and asked staff to work on the
verbiage and bring it back to the commission. The changes staff made included:
1. Page 9, paragraph 2 stated no more than one free standing tower on a property. One of the
attorney's who commented on the report suggested that it may be too restrictive. To alleviate
that; a- new paragraph "b"r was added stating "if the property was at least five acres in size, a
second tower could be considered."
2. Page 13, B2 discussed the coverage and coverage map responsibility. It now requires that the
applicant provide coverage maps of all the applicants and antenna sites within one mile of the
proposed facility. Also, they would need to submit a map to the city showing all of the existing
antenna sites within one mile of the proposed facility.
3. Page ten (paragraph 8) and twelve (paragraph 13) each contain language about the
replication of a structure. The last sentence in each of those paragraphs should be deleted.
Commissioner Trippler was concerned with the language stating there should not be more than
one freestanding tower on a property at any one time. "What if a tower is built with the intention of
removing the previous tower at completion ?" Staff felt a phrase (item C) could be added stating
when two towers would be allowable. Mr. Trippler also felt "and or business structure" should be
added to the residential guideline of a 25 -foot setback plus the height of the tower. In the case of
a tower collapsing, the safety aspect should be applied to businesses as well as residences. Staff
felt the ordinance intent was to limit the residential tower sites (zoned residential) for safety and
esthetic reasons. It also ensured some separation between the towers and residents homes.
Commissioner Ahlness asked if trails are included in Section 36 -606 (1). Staff stated they
potentially could be. He also asked where the one -mile radius was derived from when
considering a significant gap in coverage. Mr. Roberts stated that was the typical standard found
in other ordinances and requirements given by providers. He also clarified that the current density
of towers per square mile varies within the City of Maplewood.
Mr. Jim MCGreevey, attorney with Larkin Hoffman Law Firm, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South,
Bloomington, was present to represent Voice Stream Minneapolis, Inc. Mr. MCGreevey wanted to
thank the staff and the commission for listening to Voice Stream's concerns in the previous
commission meeting, and adjusting the tower ordinance accordingly.
Mr. MCGreevey stated most providers are attempting to co- locate before building a tower.
Through the normal course of the co- location investigation, they would identify where the towers
were located within a particular city.
In section 36 -606, item 6, regarding the setback issue, Voice Stream had suggested adding
language from an applicant's engineer stating that if a tower fails, it will collapse progressively
onto itself. This, he felt, would be a benefit to the city and to the providers.
Mr. Rossbach stated one of the radio towers on Highway 61 and Beam did fail and fall over. He
assumed an engineer signed off on that tower. When the ordinance was originally granted there
were safety issues addressed. "What they are designed to do, doesn't always happen ".
Mr. Mueller added 100 feet seems like a long way, but when it is your back yard, it doesn't appear
to be that far at all. Even if a resident can be guaranteed that this tower is not going to fall down,
they can still see the tower. Esthetics should be a concern in addition to the safety issue. Mr.
Mueller would much rather see a tower go 175 feet up with numerous antennas, rather than to
view two towers in his backyard.
Mr. Ahlness asked Mr. McGreevey what "environmental effects" is addressing in the letter their
law firm submitted to the city. Mr. McGreevey stated the federal government left radio frequency
up to municipalities. The letter also stated the cities actions must be based on substantial
evidence. Mr. Ahlness asked if significant resident complaint letters reach the level of substantial
evidence. Mr. McGreevey stated neighborhood opposition to a tower could be one factor in a
local government's decision making about whether to place a tower at a certain site. He did not
feel opposition, in and of itself, would rise to the level of substantial evidence without other
concerns from the government. Staff noted the proposal at the MnDOT site on McMenemy and
Highway 35E went to court over neighborhood opposition. The city lost the case, and there is
now a tower at that site.
Peter Beck was present on behalf of AT & T Wireless Services. If a user cannot get on an
existing tower due to insufficient height, he wondered if there was more impact having a separate
pole next to that one, or to have a separate pole somewhere else. He personally felt two poles
next to each other may not be ideal, but in many instances felt it could be better than having a
second or third pole somewhere else in a residential area. Maplewood does have large
residential areas.
Mr. Beck reiterated that monopole technology does not experience tower failures of a flop over
nature. The vendors that AT & T use have never had failure experience. Although he felt an
engineer would not accept responsibility for damage caused by a failure, the owner of the tower
should.
Mr. Trippler asked as more and more people start utilizing cell phones, does that mean there will
have to be more and more towers. Mr. Beck stated "for better or worse, it does ". That decision
was made at a federal level. This service must be available to every inch of the landscape and will
be provided through a competitive model with multiple companies. Mr. Beck clarified with Mr.
Trippler that satellites are not the answer for mobile phones. Numerous companies have gone
bankrupt trying to deliver telephone by satellite.
Mr. Frost suggested that the city look at making antennas in commercial areas available with just
a permit. (If an applicant chose to locate a tower on one of the designated areas, they would not
have to go through the planning commission or city council, but simply apply for a building permit).
Staff stated they have not as of yet, but it is certainly something they could consider.
Ms. Deirich confirmed with Mr. Beck that the taller the tower, the larger the base building would
need to be.
Mr. Frost moved the commission table the tower and antenna ordinance until the next planning
commission meeting. Staff will bring back the comments and suggestions in a revised ordinance.
Mr. Rossbach seconded. Ayes -All
Motion passed.
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2001
Mr. Ken Roberts gave the staff report for the city. Staff and the planning commission have been
working on an amendment to the tower and antenna ordinance. This was the third time the
proposal with the amended changes has been brought before the commission. The
proposed changes include:
1. In item 36- 606.5, which is regarding the height of a tower and co- locating in a residential
district, staff is proposing to raise the 100 feet to 125 feet. In allowing a taller height,
.hopefully it will minimize the number of towers in the same districts.
2. Page 10, item 2C was added. The statement will now read: "If the proposed tower is to
replace an existing tower and if the owner /user of the existing tower agrees to remove the
existing tower within thirty (30) days of the completion of the new or replacement tower."
3. Page eleven, item 5 will read: The height of a tower may be increased to a maximum of
one hundred twenty five (125) feet if the tower and base area are designed and built for
the co- location of at least one other personal wireless communication service provider's
antennas and equipment.
4. On page 11, items 8 and 13, the second sentence was deleted.
5. On page 13, item 14, the same language (second sentence) was deleted.
6. Page 15, items 2 and 3, language was added about accommodating system capacity
needs.
7. On top of page 16, a requirement was added that the applicant supply photo illustrations
or similar styled artist rendering of the proposed tower or antenna.
Mr. Roberts wanted feedback from the commission on if the city should start making some of the
locations for towers a permitted use. For example, if the areas around the mall (a large
commercial or industrial area) with no residential sites nearby, the city would have no reason to
deny the proposal. Therefore, the city might be better off to identify particular areas as permitted
use which would encourage the providers to look at those locations first. The applicant would still
be required to meet design and performance standards but they would not be required to obtain a
conditional use permit.
Mr. Frost was in strong support of the permitted use option. He felt there are areas in the city that
there really is no reason for the proposal to come before the commission. Technology is changing
rapidly in this field. He feels if we are proactive we can start directing these facilities to a place
where they are not going to cause problems.
Mr. Rossbach confirmed with staff that if permitted use had been applied, in the Taste of India
case, for example, the only way to ensure there was not neighborhood opposition to the tower
was to execute neighborhood surveys.
Mr. Ledvina was uneasy with the concept of permitted use as he felt towers are a different animal
because of being so tall. They can affect land uses that are quite far away from the physical base
of the tower. He felt possibly having one zone as permitted use, such as an industrial zone, may
work.
Mr. Trippler felt all of -these issues could be handled with the condition of allowing some specific
land use areas to bypass the planning commission by simply stating that if there are any
objections to the location of a site, which can't be resolved, it would come in front of the
commission. If no one objects, and it is in an industrial or business class, he would rather not see
it. He would like to see the planning commission become more proactive and select out specific
zoning areas for permitted use.
Although initially Mr. Ahlness felt the permitted use would be a good deal, he has changed his
mind after seeing how quickly a proposal can be approved by the commission (just a few minutes
for AT & T this evening). As a safeguard to the community he feels that it would be a good thing
to have all proposals reviewed before the commission.
Mr. Rossbach does not feel permitted use would provide a huge benefit to the providers. In their
past comments, they have expressed to the commission the sites they choose, are dictated by
their cell layout and where they have to put the towers to make it work. On one hand he feels
they are telling us "give us permitted areas and we will put up towers there ", and on the other
hand are saying "they have little control over where their towers go up ". Mr. Rossbach does not
feel the two mesh together very well.
Jim McGreevy, from the Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren Law Firm, was present representing
Voice Stream, Mpls. In response to a concern Mr. Trippler had regarding towers and property
values, he stated that areas where there are lakes may not have as many cell phone towers.
Other city ordinances may state no towers in residential areas. He does not feel the placement of
towers is reflective of property values. He stated the number one criteria in looking for a location
for a tower is coverage for the operators system.
Mr. McGreevy felt a provider would choose the location of towers based on numerous issues, not
specifically whether or not an area was permitted. He has dealt with a few other cities that had
designated permitted areas for towers and those areas were generally zoned industrial.
Mr. Pearson questioned what information the city receives to indicate a tower is abandoned. Staff
was not certain since we have not been informed of one in the city.
Staff noted that the intent of the revision was to have all applicants provide coverage maps of their
facilities, and a map locating other sites (not the coverage of those sites) within one mile, inside or
outside of Maplewood.
Mr. Trippler felt the towers should be EQUAL TO or more than 100 feet in height. Under the same
item in the ordinance, Mr. Mueller would like to have the statement reflect that providers design
and install all new towers to allow for the MAXIMUM of antennas on the tower.
Mr. Trippler wanted the commission to take into consideration that until the ordinance is actually
passed, and on the books, any company making application for a tower is grandfathered in with
the conditions in effect during the time they made application. Therefore, he would really like to
see the commission move on the ordinance and start applying some control over the siting
process. Step two in the process could be the permitted land use issue.
Mr. Trippler moved the board to adopt the proposed antenna and tower ordinance amendment
with the following additions:
1. Section 36 -605, part e: The applicant shall have a property acquisition specialist and a
radio frequency engineer in attendance at all city meetings to answer all questions
relevant to their application.
2. Section 36 -609, part b6, modify the section to add the words "equal to or'. It will then
read: if the tower is equal to more than one hundred feet in height, and if the tower is
equal to or more than seventy -five feet in height.
3. In the same section, "the maximum" will replace "future rearrangement of'.
Mr. Rossbach seconded. Ayes -All
Motion carries.
AGENDA ITEM NO �
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: NURP Pond Ordinance
DATE: March 28, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed - -
Modified
Rejected
The Metropolitan Council, as part of their review of Maplewood's Comprehensive Plan update, is
requiring the city to adopt a city code amendment about the use of the Nationwide Urban Runoff
Program. (NURP) design criteria for storm water ponds. The city counci gave the proposed
ordinance first reading on March 26, 2001.
DISCUSSION
The proposed code amendment adds language to the Maplewood Environmental Protection
Ordinance about using the NURP design criteria for storm water ponds. Staff at the Metropolitan
Council suggested the proposed code amendment language. I had the Assistant City Engineer
review the proposed code amendment. He did not see any problems with the code as I have
written it.
COMMISSION ACTION
On March 5, 2001, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed ordinance
amendment.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the ordinance on page 3. This ordinance amendment adds language to the city code
about the use of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) design criteria for ponds.
p:lordlnurp.ord
Attachments:
1. Existing City Code
2. Proposed Ordinance Amendment
Attachment 1
BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -194
DIVISION 3. APPROVAL STANDARDS
Sec. 9 -193. Generally.
(a) All plans and the conduct of all grading, landscaping,
structure placement, and street routing shall be consistent with
the city's comprehensive plan, and for development in the . Mis-
sissippi River Corridor Critical Area, the Maplewood Critical
al
Area Plan.
(b) The proposed development shall not lessen existing public
access to and along a protected water.
(c) The proposed development shall be designed, constructed
and maintained to avoid causing:
(1) Erosion.
(2) Pollution, contamination or siltation of water bodies or
storm sewers.
(3) Flooding.
(4) Ground water contamination.
(5) Alteration of significant natural features.
(d) Development shall not substantially diminish the scien-
tific, historical, educational, recreational or aesthetic value of
unique natural areas, plants and animals, which are registered
with the state as such, and shall not substantiall y alter their
reproductive cycles.
(e) Views of protected waters from buildings or public streets
shall not be impaired by the placement of advertising signs.
(Ord. No. 734A, § 1, 4- 25 -95; Ord. No. 753, § 1, 5- 13 -96)
Sec. 9 -194. Slopes.
(a) No development shall be permitted on existing slopes of
eighteen (18) percent or greater which are in direct drainage to a
protected water.
(b) In areas not in direct drainage to a protected water, no
development shall be allowed on existing slopes greater than
forty (40) percent.
Supp. No. 12 543
C, JCo D E
2
Attachment 2
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
THE CITY CODE BY ADDING THE NATIONWIDE URBAN RUNOFF PROGRAM
(NURP) DESIGN CRITERIA FOR PONDS
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
Section 1. This section changes the following parts of the Maplewood City Code: (Additions
have been underlined and deletions are crossed out.)
Section 9 -193. Generally.
M Where feasible, all new storm water detention ponds shall be designed and
constructed to meet the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program NURP) design Criteria of removing at
least sixty (60) percent of the phosphorous The engineer or designer may use the Walker
pondnet model or the Pitt pond model when designing storm water ponds (as noted by the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. (MPCA) Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas manual)
The applicant or applicant's engineer shall provide the city engineer with the necessary
calculations to verify the pond design.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city council approves it and the official
newspaper publishes it.
The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 2001.
Rordlnurp.ord
K
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, MARCH 5, 2001
The Metropolitan Council, as part of their review of Maplewood's Comprehensive Plan update is
requiring the city to adopt a city code amendment about the use of the nationwide urban runoff
program design criteria for storm water ponds.
Mr. Trippler stated the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program makes reference to the Nationwide
Urban Runoff Program Design Criteria -W- alker -- Pond - -Net -- Model -, -and - the-- Pit--POnd- Model- - T - he -
ordinance is requiring an applicant to conform to these examples, yet does note where they could
.b be referenced. Mr. Frost noted it is found in the MPCA's. Urban's Best Management Practices
Manual, latest addition. The commission chose to leave the reference in the ordinance as a
model that they "may" use .
Mr. Frost moved the commission adopt the ordinance that adds amended language to the city
code about the use of the nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) design criteria for ponds.
Mr. Rossbach seconded. Ayes -All
Motion carries.
Agenda No. )t
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: March 28, 2001 ,Faction by Council
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
)4-
FROM: Sherri Le
Human Resource Director
SUBJECT: Opting Out of PERA
Date -
Endorsed A -
Modified ..�..
Rejected - -- -- - __
Under Minnesota Statutes, 353.028, you have the option to decline participation in
the Public Employee's Retirement Association (PERA). I have attached a resolution
and Election for Exclusion form that is required for you to opt out of PERA. The
resolution must be approved by the City Council and is irrevocable. Once the
resolution is adopted, a certified copy must be forwarded to the Executive Director of
PERA along with the executed Election for Exclusion form.
I understand it is your intent to defer the maximum amount allowed by law into an
approved deferred compensation (457) plan in lieu of pension coverage through
PERA.. The maximum amount is $8500 for the year 2001. You can also put
additional money into an IRA at your option. In order to provide you with the
flexibility to'defer pre-tax compensation into a plan of your choosing, the City will
need to restructure your compensation.
You currently receive $97,843 in wages p an additional $5,870.58 (6 %) City
contribution to deferred compensation. In addition, the City contributes $5,068.27
(5.18 %) toward your PERA pension. If you add those three amounts, you will see
that - in addition to your car allowance and other benefits -the City currently pays
you $108,781.85 per year.
When you opt out of PERA and defer your money into a retirement plan, your
compensation would be equal to what the City is currently paying. (There would be
an insignificant increase in the worker's compensation premium of $29 /year but no
other increased cost to the City.) This could easily be accomplished by amending
your employment agreement to restructure your pay. The net effect will result in
taxable wages of $100,281.85.
RECOMMENDATION
Please ask the City Council to eliminate the 6% City contribution to deferred
compensation and the 5.18% City contribution to PERA and to amend your contract
to change your annual base salary to $108,781.75. In addition, please ask them to
approve the attached resolution as required by State Statute to approve your election
to opt out of PERA.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING ELECTION OF RICHARD FURSMAN
TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, Richard Fursman has notified the City Council of his election to be excluded from
membership in the Public Employees Retirement Association and has provided this Council with a copy
of his written election to do so, all as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 353.028.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood as
follows:
1. The Council makes the following findings:
a) Richard Fursman is the City Manager of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota.
b) That position is provided for in the ordinances of the City of Maplewood.
c) He was duly appointed to serve in that position effective October 16, 2000.
d) The City Manager is the chief administrative officer of the City of Maplewood.
e) Acting under Minnesota Statutes 353.028, he has elected to be excluded from membership
in the Public Employees Retirement Association, effective upon his filing such election
with the Executive Director of that association.
f) In making this election, he has agreed that he will not at any time in the future seek any
authorization to purchase service credit for any period of excluded service. He has further
agreed that this election is irrevocable.
2. Said election is therefore approved.
3. A certified copy of this Resolution shall be provided to the Executive Director of said
association.
ADOPTED THIS day of ) 2001.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Manager
City Clerk
(Seal)
PU9LjC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
514 St, Peter Street, Suite 200, St. Paul , MH 55102
Telephone (612) 296-7460•
ELECTION FOR EXCLUSION BY A CITY MANAGER
INSTRUCTIONS: If you are a C ity Manager who wishes to be excluded frw PERA, you
must complete, sign, and return this form to PERA within six months following the
commencement of your emp loyment . A reso lution avroving your exclusion from
PERA must be ado tad by the g overni ng body' th C mp oying you and s ould
accvm an s orm. em ers P n ceases on t e s orm s received
n e o r ce or on a later date specified,
IMPORTANT FACTS ABOUT THE INFORMATION ON THIS FORM
This application is necessary to allow exclusion from membership in PERA by a
City Manager def ined i n Minnesota Statutes, Section 353.028, Subd. 1, as
follaws:
i;e . "city roanager" means (1) a person du ly appointed to and hold
pos ition of city manager in a Pl 8 statutory city or in a home
rul city operating under the "counci l-*manageru form of gov
or ( 2) a person appointed to and hol the posi of chi
admi nistrative of f i car of a Dome rul charter city or a statutory,
city pursuant to a charter provision, ordinance, or resolution
establishing such a posi and prescribi its duties and
responsibilities.*..
The information on thi application will be used for identification and
documentation purposes. Furthermore, except for your address, the information
requested on this foram is classified as public data which can be given to
anyone for any purpose. Your address, however, is classified as private and is
available only to you to the PERA staff who mint use it during the normal
course of processing th is application; and to entities authori by law. No
private data of yours w i l l be shared with any unauthori person or agency
without your informed written consent*
I, the undersigned, el ect to be excluded fr= PERA mmb based on gay
current status as a C,i ty Manager with the goverTm ental subdivision indicated
below. as requ ired by law, I hereby state that I wi l l not at any time in. the
future seep any author ization to purchase service credit for any period of
excluded service. I understand that this election is irrevocable,
Name of Emp l oy i nq C i ty Employment Date (Mo., Day, Yr.)
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD October 16 , 2000 ERM
a ease r n - as first a n�
aft
Fursman Ric
St reet dress es t ence
355
Evans, Apt. #202
ty S tate Zi p Code
Elk River Minnesota 55330
Signature One
MAIW O908 -0Z (71 1/88)
410 4a
AGENDA ITEM NO,
49MINNNOWNUMM"M W900
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand — Assistant Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Building Design and Landscape Plan Revisions— Menard's
LOCATION: 2280 Maplewood Drive
DATE: March 28, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Background and Construction Status
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
On October 25, 1999, the city council approved the plans for the Menard's building addition at
2280 Maplewood Drive. Refer to pages 3 -5. The city council required that all sides of the
addition have an exterior of precast concrete panels with brick - pattern imprinting. Refer to
Condition 2.b. in the council motion on page 8. This addition is under construction. Instead of
the brick- pattern panels, the applicant has installed a precast -panel with an aggregate finish.
Request
Gary Colby of Menard's is requesting that the city approve the building exterior as it has been
installed. Mr. Colby is proposing to enhance the building exterior by increasing the amount of
landscaping previously approved for this site. The approved plan proposed eight trees on the
north side of the building. Refer to the approved landscape plan on page 5 and the revised
proposal on page S. The revised plan would include a two- tiered planter bed on the north side of
the building and a single -level planter on the west side.
Another change the applicant is proposing is to paint the existing wooden fascia over the front
entrance hunter green. They would also apply this dark green coloration on the building flashing.
The council required that the applicant paint or stain the addition with a color complementary to
the brick on the existing building. The applicant is requesting approval of the natural tan color of
the aggregate wall panels instead of painting the exterior.
CODE REQUIREMENT
This design issue is being forwarded to the city council as required by the city code.
Section 25 -65 (c) of the city code states that "no person shall revise a plan that the city council
originally approved without their approval."
DISCUSSION
Building Design Change
The applicant is proposing a substantial amount of landscaping to enhance the building facade.
The hunter green flashing would provide some coloration on this tall building exterior. Staff feels
to further break up the large expanse of wall surface, the applicant should paint or stain a hunter
green accent stripe to match the flashing color. This should be a colored band the width of the
sign and placed in line with the Menard's wall sign on the north side of the addition.
Staff concurs with the applicant in that the color of the addition is compatible and complementary
with the brick on the front of the building.
Phasing
The revised plans label the proposed landscaping as Phase 2. The applicant said that they are
not intending to phase the landscaping installation. If the city approves the proposed changes, it
should be conditioned upon all landscaping on the site being installed with the completion of the
addition.
COMMITTEE ACTION
March 27, 2001: The community design review board recommended approval of the revised
building design and landscape plans for Menard's. One change the board recommended is that
the total height of the two- tiered retaining wall be five feet.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the plans date - stamped March 19, 2001, for the building design and landscaping
changes for the Menard's store addition at 2280 Maplewood Drive. Approval is subject to the
property owner doing the following:
1. Painting all flashing and building fascias hunter green.
2. Painting or staining a horizontal accent stripe on the west, north and east sides of the
addition. This stripe shall be hunter green to match the fascia and flashing. The width of this
stripe shall be as wide as the Menard's wall sign on the north side of the building addition.
This stripe shall be placed in line with the " Menard's" sign on the north side of the building.
3. Installing all landscaping on the site by the time of the occupancy of the addition or the
applicant shall provide escrow as required previously by the city council.
4. Installing the two- tiered retaining wall planters with a brown -tone color as a contrast to the
building color and a rock -face front that totals a height of five feet.
5. Compliance with the October 25, 1999, city council conditions except as stated above.
p:sec9Xmenards.301
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Previously Approved Site/Landscape Plan
4. Proposed Site/Landscape Plan Revisions date - stamped March 19, 2001
5. Revised Building Elevations
6. City Council Minutes dated October 25, 1999
7. Revised Plans date - stamped March 19, 2001 (separate attachment)
2
• C�
1 ; 4. a ,.
�, • • Or
• C2
w B EAM • 1VE. � ., •• Y Cf � /
2 88 0 N
o H� `
< \?
/ Kohlmon
Gervis' � `Loks �
-:
Lake
. !��� •T COUNTY ROAD
2 640 N 'LC rp
1 PLAZA CIR 23 • I � � 5� ,
2 ALvAPA00 OR PALM Cr
J SELLECREST OR
4 OEALML DR •' r • ;,T, P N p
5 VERIDM OR f 0 5 3 CT.
CONNOR C0� %� CON NOR
Z Q � AVE.
CT. DEMON I
022 t; ►. , o
C T
o g( K S O �+
�12 > CERVAIS
2 40 0 N ' •• < <
•:..• Q eo PKWY \
•� LO •
Attachment 1
f
1. SUMMIT CT. i
2. COUNdTR'YVIEW CIR. ,t
3. DULUTH CT. 1 `-
4. LYDIA ST. t; ' 6
8 EAM
� Y
0
r 3
U ♦ W; 1
2 N
W L n .
4 N u 'o
v'
MAN AVE
I
C
a
2 W•
i
4AJ V
W �
Cr
U � I
BROOKS'
SEX TO
I`
AVE. S CER VAIS
V GRAN DVI , A
VIKING D1
I SHERREN AVE.
''' `'' •' � •. � v
Kr
I
•• .....• . • ..• OP
• •� _
LARK T . 4 4, � AVE.
Keller
WE. WE. ( •• • f VIKING DR. W 6C La k• ° CO. < R0. �� v LAURIE RD. C ' j
= W p ��i t LELAND RD. 0 c SANDH URST
Cr. z 3r LAURIE CT. �� z =
t�
►= t- o�' j5 Ln a , ZS �. JUNC N AVE. w 8 �i , • • .
• • &
` �' " "Kr CT. oo° a ev E � .2 -
RKE AVE. BU A.
Cr BURKE AV ""4~ 4� 1 ) ST �) AVE. m O Gt
0
z
TIE Av r 4" ° �+Ip N ELDR IDLE AVE. J
JCf AV I E. 0 . 0 �? L& W
of . W O0hrr.n• N' BELMONT CDVRSE 1, BELMONT I AVE. _
LA. 'o j GOB SKILL �' /►V E. SKILL ALAN AVE. ! AVE. W I / SKIL1JulAN AV. KENW OOD KEI�R = SH��� �
Cr
> Wi � V �k
yy < _ 3• Q: o ! RYI AN AV.
mi o 60 A te, fY �
.RN7N • AV z W
Cr moo* C
.r..^ ►+rt G� tv ` ° �� 27 �— f ROST cn = o W
ROSELA
J
W
Z6 BELLWOOD /WE I fs NTON I► i ® } 4 `
o' AVE. Cr FE VE• W Z S I
; O O 6Z W J AV E O V �j
MER
W SUMMER ; o < 3 J ° •
o . CT. W _ ; j kOR D ° FRISBtE AVE. ,
LOCATION MAP
3
4
N
Attachment Z
..: , v- . r
rJ
i
15 14
2255 �•��
C
1'
s 2233 = �'
1
2223
� sc
1174 •
-- r
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
4
4
N
lK
b
&-ri
V
,
►
HIGHWAY
36'
!.CAI ►
�
op
`
"
r
0
1
I � �
�
•f •
•fr
/
'
P
O
I
��
•.
VW/SAAB
•
=y
'• I
6 0-
•
'I
1 f
..: , v- . r
rJ
i
15 14
2255 �•��
C
1'
s 2233 = �'
1
2223
� sc
1174 •
-- r
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
4
4
N
Attachment 3
IS K
vivo
owt
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
SITE /LANDSCAPE PLAN
5
LN
PROPOSED ADDITION
Attachme 4
•\ i
• � ♦00000000�
\ WIDE SIDEWALK
• r -soo
ooa►�s °000
♦00000000�
� ♦0000000t
.� •s�• eo °o °o °o °off
• oo °: °:o: °:
►i
•
1
1
u 1
1
■
dop
I n
355 EXISTING PARKING
439 NEW TOTAL PARKING
•' III1
1Z11/1
• O PP
MR
a
*J
SITE /LANDSCAPE PLAN REVISIONS
A
4
N
EDGE OF ROOF LINE (BEYOND)
0%1
N
NEW BUILDING
ADDITION
EAST El
NEW DOWN SPOUTS
48' - 0' 48' - 0' 48 - 0'
''ia '� �•
NEW B ILDING
o ADDITI N NEW CUTOFF LUMINAIRES
EXISTING WALPACS
AT 18' -0' A.F.F. 5 N
SCUPPERS (NT -8)
124'-0-
..
J '
r,. �..�, �,.. .� ..�.> .s., f � -
rt�.Y. •f l7•: J� \``�. :2'i4i `wf� >! tr;l.
fit;. ►.. ;�. ��••:' r,. !';' �I 1 .!_..% - :.,al' .7 L � �•` -;,'
.fir
• . ,
�.
t"1 a •..
+'
:l. .j.i'..'.:.' yr. :•'.r�.s• •�::�` .c f �'1'/ .: '',�i'�.i�r;!:
"��i,;'r:�� t.' t " .
Q.
CD � .. .
i ' i I' _?' r ? ��'l , .a'
f �! 'r
:�' �'•r' • d : "V`"'I r
� ,.
P •r
•{ is
0%1
N
NEW BUILDING
ADDITION
EAST El
NEW DOWN SPOUTS
W
Z f
''ia '� �•
NEW CUTOFF LUMINAIRES
M
AT 18' -0' A.F.F.
SCUPPERS (NT -8)
124'-0-
NEW 'GREEN' EAVE
FLASH (NT -7)
2' -0•
2 4* - Do 24' -0' 24' -0'
24' -0' 24' -0'
-.
:.
OD
-i
Z
CL
; I
ul
NEW 12' PRECAST WALL PANEL W/
COMPLIMENTARY COLOR
NEW *GREEN" CAP TRIM (NT -6) —%, 'MENARDS' SIGN 312 SO.FT.
6' HIGH BY 52' LONG
w (0-i
40 z 1-.4 w m
11 za
• • •
t
NEW 12' PRECAST WALL PANEL U
COMPLIMENTARY COLOR
ri
_NORTH ELEVATION —NEW
NEW 'GREEN' CAP TRIM (NT -6)
CD
W
Z f
''ia '� �•
•
M
ci
R EC;:ivEp
MAR 19 2U91
r BOTTOM OF CUTOFF LUMINAIRES
AT 22' -0' A.F.F.
I T
i V I a 2 11
LL NEW WIN TO BE
EXISTING BUILDING SIGNAGE
REMOVE EXISTING STEEL
CANOPY SIDING L INSTALL
NEW GREEN STEEL W/ J TRIM.
BOTTOM OF CUTOFF LUMINAIRES
AT 22' -0' A.F.F.
r— NEW MENARDS SIGN 312 SO. FT. NEW BUILDING
6' HIGH BY 52' LONG ADDITION
FRONT WALL OF NEW BUILDING
ADDITION 2' AHEAD OF EXISTING
BUILDING WALL v;l
441 f,,fr
pp
VIP"
' ? A A A b A6 26 '
T.O. W mnnw
NEW 12' PRECAST WALL PANEL W/ FLEW= 113' -10 1/2' L EXISTING BRICK
COMPLIMENTARY COLOR B.O. N FACED BUILDING
ELEV.= 107' -0'
VEST ALL NEW WINDOWS TO BE
_ 6' -10 1/2' HIGH BY 12' WIDE
BUILDIN G ELEVATION REVISIONS
C+
C+
m
Attachment 6
12. The perimeter of the building must be kept accessible for fire emergencies. The applicant shall arrange with
the fire marshal for access through the gate behind the building in the case of emergencies.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on October 25, 1999.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the plans date - stamped May 5, 1999, and the parking -lot curbing addendum
date - stamped May 14, 19 or the - square- oot addition to enar s, 2280 Maplewood rive. Approval is
su sect to the tollowing conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall:
a. Submit grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to the city engineer for approval.
b. Revise the building elevations for staff approval to extend the front (westerly) elevation of the
proposed addition two feet to the west of the existing wall. The applicant shall use brick - imprinted,
precast concrete panels, as proposed, on all sides of the proposed addition. The color shall be
complementary to the brick color of the existing building. The applicant shall also revise the
C. Revise the site and landscape plans for staff approval as follows:
(1) Provide enough handicap - accessible parking spaces to comply with ADA (Americans with
Disabilities Act) requirements.
(2) Increase the tree sizes to six - feet -tall for the spruce trees and 2 '/2 inches in caliper for the
deciduous trees.
(3) Delete the curb cut labeled as "existing access" leading into the proposed 149 -car parking
lot. Parking stripes shall be added in the area of this curb cut.
d. Submit a site - lighting plan for staff approval for the new parking lot. The light source, including
the lens covering the bulb, shall be concealed so not to cause any nuisance to drivers or neighbors.
3. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Close the existing curb cut north of the building with continuous concrete curbing, remove the
asphalt and landscape according to the approved plan. The proposed access driveway and curb cut
shall meet all requirements of the city engineer.
b. Menard's shall provide a gate and clear access to the sanitary sewer manhole on the site as part of
this request.
C. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter all around the new parking lot west of the outside -
storage yard. The applicant shall also provide the curbed medians as shown on the addendum and
repave this entire area.
d. Paint new rooftop mechanical equipment to match the building color if the units are visible. (code
requirement)
10 -25 -99
EP
e. The trash- dumpster screening requirement is waived unless the dumpsters would be visible to the
public. In which case, an enclosure shall be provided using the same materials and color as the
building.
f. An in ground lawn - irrigation system shall not be required for the landscaped area in the southwest
corner of the site. The applicant shall install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for the landscaped
area north of the building.
g. Provide site - security lighting as required by the code. The light source, including the lens covering
the bulb, shall be concealed so not to cause any nuisance to drivers or neighbors.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount
shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be
completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within six weeks if the
building is occupied in the spring or summer.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor
changes.
6. Signs are not part of this approval. Staff will review sign permit requests.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
10 -25 -99
9
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001
• „ , I / • , • I • , , w , , O
Mr. Tom Ekstrand, Assistant Director of Community Development, gave the staff report for the
city. In observation by staff and the design board members, the exterior on the new addition that
was approved by the board, was not used. A brick embossed precast panel was the exterior
approved. What was installed was an aggregate finish. Also, five additional feet were added to
the height of the building.
The applicant has submitted plans showing revisions which show a greatly enhanced landscaping
plan on the westerly and northerly faces of the new addition. Since the report was mailed out, the
applicant has informed staff that they have pressure washed the exterior. Staff did have an
opportunity to go look at the exterior yesterday. It did wash off some of the grey and makes the
exterior appear more tan in color. The coloration of the new exterior is now more compatible to
the brick on the existing building. Staff therefore, would like to alter the recommendation to note
the building color as being acceptable. Since the fascia on the front of the building will be a hunter
green, staff is suggesting an accent stripe of the hunter green along the north face of the building.
Mr. Gary Colby, with Menards, was present to answer questions. Mr. Colby displayed photos of
the exterior of the building after it had been pressure washed. He felt the color of the building was
now a very close match to the existing building. The previously approved grey color for the
building flashing will now be a hunter green. Hunter green is now one of Menard's basic colors in
their new corporate color scheme. The green accent stripe, proposed by staff, was reviewed by
Menard's, and they feel it is a good suggestion. Although staff proposed a six - foot -wide stripe to
go behind the sign, Mr. Colby noted they would like to use a narrow stripe below the sign, and run
it along the east, north and west elevations.
The landscape they are now proposing is quite extensive. The original plan submitted had eight
trees along the north facade. They now are proposing to replace the 8 trees with 19 trees and
184 shrubs. It will not be possible to have the landscaping done by the time they would like to
occupy the building, but they are willing to put up an escrow to ensure the completion of the
landscaping in June. The retaining wall block will be a darker color than the color of the addition
to add some contrast to the north end of the building. The retaining wall planters will each be two -
feet in height. It will be a combination of a curved and straight wall and extend all across the north
end of the building. The applicant feels the installation of the retaining wall and landscape will, in
effect, reduce the height of the building.
As boardmember Olson pointed out, and other boardmembers agreed, the accent stripe should
run behind the red text just as it is on the sign above the front door. They felt continuing the
theme around the building would be appropriate.
Mr. Ledvina felt the total planter height should be 5 feet. He felt this would then proportionately
decrease the excessive height appearance of the building.
Boardmember Olson moved the board to approve the plans date - stamped March 19, 2001 for the
building design and landscaping changes for the Menard's store addition at 2280 Maplewood
Drive. Approval is subject to the property owner doing the following:
1. Painting all flashing and building fascias hunter green.
2. Painting or staining a horizontal accent stripe on the west, north and east sides of the
addition. This stripe shall be hunter green to match the fascia and flashing. The width of
this stripe shall be as wide as the Menard's wall sign on the north side of the building
addition.. This stripe shall be placed in line with the "Menard's" sign on the north side of
the building.
3. Installing all Landscaping on the site by the time of the occupancy of the addition or the
applicant shall provide escrow as required previously by the city council.
4. Installing the two- tiered retaining wall planters with a brown -tone color as a contrast to the
building color and a rock -face front that total a height of 5 feet.
5. Compliance with the October 25, 1999 city council conditions except as stated above.
Mr. Shankar seconded. Ayes -All
Motion carries.
Agenda Item K oo s3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: April 03, 2001
RE: Council Meeting Date Change
The Rules of Procedure for City Council Meetings states:
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modred
Rejected
The City Council shall hold regular meetings on the second and fourth
Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m., provided that when the day fixed for
any regular meeting falls on a day designated by law as a legal holiday, such
meeting shall be held at the same hour on the next succeeding Tuesday, not
a holiday, unless authorized by the City Council.
The second meeting in the month of May falls on Memorial Day. It is recommended that
Council change the meeting date to Tuesday, May 29, 2001 so that publishing requirements can
be met.
Agenda Item
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: April 03, 2001
RE: Dog & Cat License - Senior Citizen Fee
Introduction
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
At the March 26th council meeting Mayor Cardinal directed staff to propose a senior citizen
discount for pet licensing.
These licenses are set by the city council on an annual basis. The current fee for dog and cat
licenses are $18 per license. If the animal is spayed or neutered the fee is $15.
Recommendation
Staff recommends a 15% discount for senior citizens for cat and dog licenses, rounding to the
nearest dollar. Upon approval, the fee will be $15 for the regular license and $13 for animals that
are spayed or neutered.
AGENDA REPORT Action by Cou:'s cii
TO: City Manager Date
Endorsed
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
Modified
woom
SUBJECT: Gladstone West Neighborhood Street Improvements, Ci Project
p y }
1. Approve Plans and Advertising for Bids
2. Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll
3. Order Assessment Hearing
DATE.: April 2, 2001
Plans and specifications, for the above - referenced project, have been completed and are
ready to be advertised for bids. The proposed bid opening for this project is scheduled for
10 a.m., Friday, May 11, 2001. Award of bids will be considered by the city council at the
May 14, 2001, city council meeting, following the assessment hearing.
With the approval to advertise for bids, the next steps in the improvement process are to
prepare the assessment roll. and order the assessment hearing. The amounts to be
assessed are not directly dependent on the actual amount of the bid, rather on a
predetermined assessment rate established in the city's pavement management policy and
outlined in the feasibility study. The only proposed changes in the assessment roll will be for
the concrete -curb option on Duluth and Atlantic Streets.
As a result of a questionnaire sent to the residents on Duluth and Atlantic Street, the
proposed concrete option was almost unanimously rejected by the neighborhood. The
results of the questionnaire were as follows: 52 sent and 31 returned. Of the 31 returned, 6
were in favor of concrete curb and 25 in favor of the integral bituminous curb. The
assessment roll has now been prepared to reflect the integral bituminous curb option for
Duluth and Atlantic Streets.
The completed assessment roll is available for viewing in the office of the city clerk and the
office of the city engineer. It is recommended that the assessment hearin g be scheduled for
7:15 p.m., Monday, May 14, 2001.
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolutions for the
Gladstone West Neighborhood Street Improvements, Project 00 -05:
1. Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids.
2. Ordering the Preparation of the Assessment Roll.
3. Ordering the Assessment Hearing.
CIVIC
jw
RESOLUTION
APPROVING PLANS
ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on March 12, 2001,
plans and specifications for the Gladstone West Neighborhood Streets, City Project 00-
05, have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has
presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval,
..NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made
a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city
clerk.
2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and
in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall
be published twice, at least ten days before.the date set for bid opening, shall specify
the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the
council at 10 a.m., on the 11 th day of May, 2001, at the city hall and that no bids shall
be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a certified
check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the
amount of such bid.
3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to
receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to
tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids, and the award of a
contract, at the regular city council meeting of May 14, 2001.
RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer will receive bids for the improvement
of the Gladstone West Neighborhood Streets, City Project 00 -05.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith
calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against
every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without
regard to cash r valuation, as - provided by law., and they shalt.file. a copy of. such
proposed assessment in the city office for inspection.
FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify
the council thereof.
i t
:1
�
j
RESOLUTION
ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING
WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at the direction of the council,
prepared an assessment roll for the construction of the Gladstone West Neighborhood
Streets, City Project 00 -05, and the said assessment is on file in the office of the city
clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
i. A hearing shall be held on the 14th day f May, 2001, at the city hall at
Y Y Y
7:15 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all
persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to
pp Y
be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks
prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said
assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the
general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed
assessment roll is on file with the clerk and that written or oral objections will be
considered.